Council Agenda
Ordinary
Council Meeting
7.00pm, 13 December, 2011
Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council allows a minimum of
15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting.
If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person
presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than
can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will
determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no
member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter
into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public
question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s
wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main
reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of
the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with
the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting
i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding will
control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a
question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing
to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the
question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item
number should also be stated.
The
following general rules apply to question and statement time:
·
Questions should only relate to the business of the council and
should not be a statement or personal opinion.
·
Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be
considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that
relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be
taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
·
Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or
employees.
·
Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as
to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
·
The first priority will be given to persons who are asking
questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
·
The second priority will be given to public statements.
Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be
heard.
The
Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the
meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm
where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you
wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in
writing, at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to
the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A
request for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the
Friday before the Council Meeting.
·
A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those
persons may address the meeting.
·
Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10
minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the
Council.
Please ensure that mobile
phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries
on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
·
To ensure that there is a process
in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
·
To emphasise that the reason for
recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and
that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of
Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings
of the Council, Electors, Audit Committee and Public Question Time during
Council Briefing Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound
recording equipment, except in the case of meetings of the Council where the
Council closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause
(1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public
shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is
to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record
the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of
the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may
purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded
proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing
recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the CD plus
staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised
listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost
of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may
request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no
transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are
requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to
the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the
State Records Act 2000 (General Disposal Authority for Local Government
Records). The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is
thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be
printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special
Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are
recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting
will be held at the Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 13 December, 2011
commencing at 7.00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive
Officer
8 December, 2011
CONTENTS
Item 1_____ Attendances_ 1
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence_ 1
Item 3_____ Public Question Time_ 1
PQ01-11/11 Ms S Winton, Gibbs Road,
Nowergup 1
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes_ 3
OC01-12/11 Minutes of Ordinary
Council Meeting held on 15 November 2011 3
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without
Discussion_ 3
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members_ 3
Item 7_____ Petitions_ 4
New Petitions Received 4
Update on Petitions 4
PT01-11/11 Unsightly
Advertising, Wangara Industrial Estate and Speeding, Shiraz Boulevard, Pearsall 4
PT02-11/11 Access via
Backshall Place into Regent Waters Estate 4
PT03-11/11 Objection to
Proposed Development – Lot 1061 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler 4
Item 8_____ Reports_ 4
Planning and Sustainability 5
Policies and Studies 5
PS01-12/11 North Alkimos
Foreshore Management Plan 5
Town Planning Schemes & Structure
Plans 24
PS02-12/11 Adoption of East
Wangara Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81 - Lots 478 Prestige Parade
& 479 Vision Street, Wangara 24
PS03-12/11 Adoption of
Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88 58
Development Applications 112
PS04-12/11 Proposed Extension
to Ocean Keys Shopping Centre, Clarkson - DA09/1266 112
PS05-12/11 Development
Application - Tourism/Advertising Signs Located Within Marmion Avenue Road
Reserve 140
PS06-12/11 Development
Application - Temporary Sales Office (and associated car park, access and
earthworks) at Lot 9504, 1700 Marmion Avenue, Tamala Park 156
PS07-12/11 Development Application
– Clearing and Bulk Earthworks at Lot 9002 (2611) Marmion Avenue, Alkimos 162
PS08-12/11 Development
Application – Bulk Earthworks and Other Development at Lot 2 Marmion
Avenue, Eglinton 166
Other Matters 176
PS09-12/11 Subdivisional
Retaining Walls Over 3.0 Metres in Height - Lots 134 and 135 Landsdale Road,
Landsdale (WAPC 142790) 176
PS10-12/11 Subdivisional
Retaining Walls Over 3.0 Metres in Height - Lot 130 Landsdale Road Stage 2,
Landsdale (WAPC 141832) 181
PS11-12/11 Proposed Northern
Extension of Wangara Industrial Area 186
City Businesses 195
Regulatory Services 195
CB01-12/11 Provision of an Emergency
Services Levy Grant Scheme Funded Incident Control Vehicle 195
City Business 203
CB02-12/11 Expenditure of Surplus
Reserve Funds - Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) Reserve 203
Infrastructure 208
Infrastructure Maintenance 208
IN01-12/11 Installation
of a Fully Monitored Fire and Smoke Detection System at Aquamotion 208
Infrastructure Projects 211
IN02-12/11 Flynn Drive
Realignment Project 211
Tenders 212
IN03-12/11 Tender No.
01133 for Supply and Installation of Fencing (Panel Contract) for a Period of
One Year 212
IN04-12/11 Tender No.
01140 - Supply and Laying of Block Turf (Panel Contract) for a Period of One
Year 217
Traffic Management 221
IN05-12/11 PT03-06/11 -
Lagoon Drive/Brazier Road Intersection - Request for Traffic Calming 221
IN06-12/11 Parking
Prohibition - Abbeville Circle - Mindarie Primary School, Mindarie 230
Community Development 234
Communication and Events 234
CD01-12/11 Request to Sponsor West
Coast Employee of the Year Award 2012 234
Other Matters 236
CD02-12/11 Australian Government:
Regional Development Australia Fund - Round Two - Yanchep Active Open Space
Playing Fields and Sports Amenities 236
Corporate Strategy & Performance 241
Finance 241
CS01-12/11 Warrant of Payment for
the Period to 30 November 2011 241
CS02-12/11 Financial Activity
Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2011 300
CS03-12/11 Review of 10 Year
Financial Plan 312
Governance and Executive Services 319
CS04-12/11 Annual Review of
Delegated Authority Register 319
CS05-12/11 Delegation of Authority
Over the Council Recess 355
CS06-12/11 Proposed Additional Ordinary
Council Meeting in February 2012 357
CS07-12/11 Donations to be
Considered by Council - December 2011 359
CS08-12/11 Consideration of Motions
presented at the Annual General Meeting of Electors 363
Property 364
CS09-12/11 Proposed Sale of Portion
of Lot 506 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo 364
CS10-12/11 Proposal to Create a New
Locality Named 'Catalina' 368
CS11-12/11 Proposed Lease to Youth
Futures WA (Inc) - Portion of Clarkson Youth Centre 374
Chief Executive Office 378
Other Matters 378
CE01-12/11 Metropolitan Local
Government Review Submission 378
Item 9_____ Motions on Notice_ 379
MN01-12/11 Cr Rudi Steffens – Dog
Exercise Area - Kingsway 379
MN02-12/11 Cr Brett Treby –
Basketball - Development in the Northern Suburbs 381
Item 10____ Urgent Business_ 383
Item 11____ Confidential_ 383
CR01-12/11 Yanchep Active Open Space
- Agreement to Address Costs and Responsibilities 383
CR02-12/11 Mindarie Regional Council
and the Process Associated with the Withdrawal of the City of Stirling 383
CR03-12/11 Withdrawal From Food Act
Prosecution 383
CR04-12/11 Proposal for Mary Lindsay
Homestead 383
CR05-12/11 Acquisition of Land - Lot
148 (257) Franklin Road Wanneroo Required for the Widening and Upgrading of the
Caporn/Franklin Road Intersection 384
CR06-12/11 Salaried Officers Union
Collective Agreement 2011 384
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting_ 384
Item 13____ Closure_ 384
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we
acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which we meet and I
invite you to bow your head in prayer:
Lord,
We ask for your blessing upon
our City, our community and our council. Guide us in our decision making to act
fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty.May
we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to
a prosperous future that all may share.We ask this in your name.
Amen
Item 1 Attendances
Item 2 Apologies
and Leave of Absence
Item 3 Public
Question Time
Public Questions presented at the 15 November 2011
Council Meeting and taken on notice
|
|
|
Lot 52
Nowergup Road, Nowergup – Lime Industries
1. Has
Lime Industries ever had any approvals for any activities on lot 52 Nowergup
Road under the District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) or the previous Town
Planning Scheme?
2. Has
Lime Industries ever had Council approval for lime manufacturing on site?
3. Has
Lime Industries ever had Council approval for extractive industries?
4. Under
Freedom of Information it has become apparent that the City of Wanneroo
Planning Department has formally written to the land owner on 11 July 2011
informing the land owner “With respect to the driver training
facility the City does not have any record of having approved the use and
therefore it is unauthorised. Under DPS2, driver training falls into
the category of an educational establishment in a rural resource zone.
An educational establishment is an ‘x’ not permitted use in this
zone and cannot be approved. Accordingly, you are requested to cease
operation of the driver training within 28 days of the date of the letter, ie
8 August 2011.” Could the Administration detail the steps and
dates of the actions taken in relation to this unlawful activity since that
letter on 7 July 2011?
5. Could
Administration outline the evidence gathering that has occurred to inform the
City’s position and how many visits by the Compliance Officer to the
site and dates that occurred?
6. Does
the City of Wanneroo now know how many times the operator has acted
unlawfully since 8 August 2011, when formally requested to stop? If so,
could it provide details?
7. Who
can the City prosecute in relation to this unlawful activity? Is it Lime
Industries as the land owner or is it RMS Mining School as the operator?
8. Under
which Act or Acts and the relevant sections can this unlawful activity be
prosecuted by the City of Wanneroo?
9. Could
you explain the procedure involved in pursuing such prosecutions and the
consequences?
10. Could
you estimate the cost to the City of prosecuting the above and what are the
penalties involved?
11. Has
the City reported the operator to Worksafe or any other government agency
given that the operator is clearly acting unlawfully without any conditions
or controls and operating within 100m of residences?
12. Previously
the City advised that Lime Industries has applied for various activities
including quarrying, lime production and driver training and submitted an
application on 24 August 2011?
13. It
has been indicated to me that the City has asked for more information on this
application. Could you explain what further information was requested
and has the information been received? Is it now adequate and in an
acceptable form and most importantly to the community, when will the
development application be advertised?
14.
My question 10 to the 11 October 2011 Council meeting was that “Under
FOI I received a copy of a letter sent from the Western Australian Planning
Commission to the City of Wanneroo in 1999 in relation to the identification
of priority resource areas. It specifically requested that the City
provide updates to the extractive inventory and the working plans and to
provide any further advice or concerns. Can you confirm whether the
City responded to this request and provided the details.” The
answer to that question was “Administration will need to conduct a
search of the City’s records in order to respond to this
question.” My question now is has the City conducted a search of
its records so that it can answer that question for the community?
Response
by Mayor Roberts
Questions
taken on notice.
Further
Response by Director Planning and Sustainability
1. The
City has no record of any planning approval previously being granted for the
activities currently undertaken on Lot 52.
2. Refer
response to question 1. Notwithstanding that, it is known that lime
manufacturing was previously undertaken on the property and there is clear historical
evidence of that having occurred.
3. Refer
response to question 2. Similarly, there is historical evidence of an
extractive industry operation occurring on the property.
4. Administration
has inspected the property on numerous occasions since July 2011 to gather
further evidence of the activities being carried out. The City has also
been in frequent written and verbal communication with the landowner and
operators in an effort to cease the unauthorised activities on the site.
5. Refer
response to question 4.
6. The
City has gathered its own evidence in relation to RMS’s operations on
the property and has also been receiving regular updates of the same from
adjoining landowners. RMS’s continued operations on the property
would represent an ongoing breach of the Scheme, for conducting a use without
approval.
7. Action
can be taken against both the landowner and operator.
8. The
Planning and Development Act (Part 13) covers all matters related to
activities being carried out in breach of the City’s District Planning
Scheme No. 2. In order to pursue a prosecution, a complaint must be
made, served and lodged with the district court. The complaint must then
be scheduled for hearing in accordance with normal court procedures.
9. In
the event of any prosecution the City would undertake proceedings pursuant to
the Planning and Development Act 2005 and instruct solicitors to act on its
behalf. Also refer response to question 8.
10. The
City is unable to estimate the costs associated with prosecution as they
would depend on the overall time taken for the matter to be dealt with
through the courts. In accordance with Clause 223 of the Planning &
Development Act 2005:
“Unless otherwise
provided, a person who commits an offence under this Act is liable to a fine
of $200,000 and, in the case of a continuing offence, a further fine of $25,000
for each day during which the offence continues.”
11. Yes.
12. This
is a statement of fact, not a question.
13. Generally,
the additional information sought by the City pertains to the following:
·
Requesting clearer plans;
·
Requesting the provision of assorted management plans and
reports; and
·
Requesting information regarding the staging and timeframes for
the continuing operations on Lot 52.
Once the additional information
is received and the City is satisfied that it is sufficient, the application
will be advertised for public comment.
14. Administration
is still reviewing the City’s records in this regard. However, it
is proving both difficult and time-consuming to search for all and any
correspondence to the WAPC dating back to 1999, regarding its Basic Raw
Materials Policy, and across numerous hard-copy electronic City record management
systems.
|
Item 4 Confirmation
of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 15
November 2011 be confirmed.
Item 5 Announcements
by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions
from Elected Members
Item
7 Petitions
New Petitions Received
Update on Petitions
|
|
|
Cr Cvitan presented a petition of 15 signatures requesting
the removal of the advertising on walls of businesses backing onto Ocean Reef
Road in Wangara and the introduction of traffic calming devices on Shiraz Boulevard,
Pearsall.
UPDATE
In respect to the signage matter raised in the petition
it will be registered in Planning Implementation’s development
compliance register. The matter will be assessed and any compliance
action will be taken as appropriate.
An Infrastructure report is scheduled for the proposed 21
February 2012 Council meeting.
|
|
|
|
Cr Guise presented a petition of 249 signatures requesting
the immediate re-opening of the left turn pocket eastbound on Ocean Reef Road
into Backshall Place at Regent Waters Estate.
UPDATE
This matter was dealt with at the Council meeting of 15
November 2011 at Item
IN09-11/11.
|
|
|
|
Cr Steffens presented a petition of 24 signatures
objecting to the proposed development that includes a liquor store, fast food
restaurant and medical centre at Lot 1061 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler.
UPDATE
A report is anticipated for the 7 February 2012 meeting of
Council.
|
Item 8 Reports
Declarations of
Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest.
Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive
Officer.
Planning and Sustainability
Policies and Studies
PS01-12/11 North
Alkimos Foreshore Management Plan
File Ref: 2947
– 11/124601
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 9
Issue
To consider the draft North Alkimos Foreshore Management
Plan (FMP) for endorsement.
Background
Council adopted the North Alkimos Local Structure Plan (LSP)
at its meeting on 31 May 2011 after originally considering the LSP in June
2009.
As the development abuts the coastline, the LSP requires a
FMP to be produced and approved by the Department of Planning (DoP), the City
of Wanneroo, and the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC).
On 13 April 2011, the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC) endorsed the draft FMP; however, the City did not receive a
copy of the draft FMP until after the WAPC had endorsed the document.
Administration wrote to the WAPC on 23 June 2011,
highlighting that under the provisions of the LSP, the draft FMP requires the
approval of the DoP, CoW and the DEC and the DoP therefore should have
consulted with the City regarding its position on the draft FMP to enable a
concurrent and coordinated assessment of the FMP. The DoP responded in a letter
dated 27 July 2011 stating that:
“The FMP having been endorsed by the WAPC simply
means that where works are in accordance with the FMP they are not required
under the MRS to obtain development approval from the WAPC. WAPC endorsement in
no way excuses the applicant/owner from being subject to all City of Wanneroo
(City) planning approval processes.”
Administration and the DEC have subsequently reviewed the
draft FMP and required various changes to be made by the proponent (PEET
Alkimos Pty Ltd). The proponent has now amended the draft FMP and resubmitted
the revised version for endorsement. A copy of the draft (revised) FMP has been
placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Detail
The purpose of the draft FMP is to provide a management
framework that will guide foreshore management and appropriate development of
the foreshore area adjacent to PEET’s Shorehaven development.
The Shorehaven development has a coastal frontage of 1.74km.
The foreshore reserve, as shown in Attachment 1 forms part of Bush
Forever (BF) site No. 397 (coastal strip from Wilbinga to Mindarie). Attachment
2 depicts that the foreshore is reserved for Parks and Recreation under the
Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and delineates between land owned by PEET and
land that is managed by the City on behalf of the WAPC, within the foreshore
reserve.
Proposed development
The draft FMP proposes the following structural elements
within the foreshore reserve; these are also shown in Attachment 3.
· Four
lookouts within the foreshore reserve;
· One
lookout just east of the MRS boundary in the northern end of the development;
· Four
major nodes, including pedestrian and vehicular access, as well as seating,
BBQ’s and shade structures;
· Eight
minor pedestrian nodes;
· Eight
beach access ways;
· Two
access ways for people with disabilities;
· Primary
north/south pedestrian access route that runs the length of the development;
· North/south
coastal promenade and bike trail that runs the length of the development;
· Six
secondary pedestrian foreshore accesses;
· Two
primary pedestrian routes (Viggo Trail) east/west leading into the foreshore;
· Two
secondary pedestrian routes (Viggo Trail) east/west leading into the foreshore;
· Three
drainage basins proposed in the foreshore reserve; one in active POS and two in
landscaped areas;
· Two
drainage basins are located adjacent to the foreshore in active POS.
Details and descriptions of proposed public facilities and
infrastructure included in the foreshore are included in Attachment 4.
The typical construction details for the above structural
elements that are proposed in the FMP, are outlined in Attachment 5.
Administration is satisfied with the specifications included within the draft
FMP, with the exception of fence design and dual use path widths. The proponent
has been informed that the design specifications for these proposed structures
do not accord with the City’s standards. The FMP will therefore
need to be amended to accord with the City’s requirements.
Drainage
The FMP currently depicts some drainage in vegetated areas
of the foreshore and swales within the foreshore. In this regard, drainage in
vegetated foreshore areas is unacceptable, while swales should only exist in
active Public Open Space (POS) areas, as a last resort for drainage of the
adjacent subdivision. All other drainage from the adjacent subdivision must be
dealt with in that subdivisional area, not in the foreshore reserve. The
FMP will need to be amended accordingly.
Village Foreshore Park
One of the four major nodes proposed in the draft FMP is the
Village Foreshore Park. The Village Foreshore Park has been strategically
located within a large central blowout, the extent of which is shown in Attachment
6. Locating the Village Foreshore Park within this blowout that is
identified as being “Completely Degraded”, will avoid clearing
other areas of vegetation in better condition. As this dunal area is highly
mobile, before development can commence, the blowout needs to be stabilised.
Stabilisation of the blowout and subsequent development will be undertaken in
six stages, as detailed in Attachment 7.
The conceptual design of the Village Foreshore Park POS
shown in Attachment 8 includes passive park spaces, zones for active
sport and play, event spaces, beach lookouts, picnic and BBQ areas, a promenade
and walking paths.
This area will provide a range of leisure and recreational
options for the community and will likely become a major destination for use
and enjoyment of the City’s coastline in future. A diagram showing the
conceptual Village Foreshore Park view perspectives is included as Attachment
9.
A beach club is proposed on the southern side of the Village
Foreshore Park. The draft FMP describes it as a key community facility for both
local residents and visitors.
When developed, the beach club will be a focal point for
many activities, including sports and recreation; health and fitness; youth
activities; community events and local information.
Administration is currently involved in discussions with the
proponent in regards to concept designs for the proposed beach club and whether
the City would have any desire or need to be involved in its future operation.
Implementation Schedule
An implementation schedule has been included in section 7 of
the draft FMP. This schedule contains objectives, recommendations, actions,
responsible authority, monitoring and staging in delivering the FMP.
The implementation schedule does not require the City to
undertake any works, however it does propose the City accept handover of
certain assets to maintain and manage. However, the FMP acknowledges that
the City may require any works or infrastructure that the City deems not feasible
to manage or maintain, based on life-cycle costs, to be removed or modified to
the satisfaction of the City prior to handover. The FMP also requires the
proponent to provide to the City (at the time of making its request for
handover), asset management data for the said works or infrastructure, to the
City’s satisfaction. To further reinforce this arrangement it is
recommended that a new provision be added to the FMP, requiring the developer
to provide plans and specifications of all proposed works, to the City for
approval, prior to any such works being undertaken.
City of Wanneroo Draft Coastal Management Plan (CMP)
Council has endorsed a CMP for
public comment. The advertising period for Part 1 of the CMP commenced on
24 October 2011. One of the recommendations of the draft CMP is to
provide a 500m long dog beach in North Alkimos by 2015.
The proposed dog beach in the
draft CMP overlaps the northern section of the draft FMP by approximately 400m.
The draft FMP does not plan for the provision of a dog beach and this is
understandable because the CMP is only in draft form and may change following
public consultation. Council endorsement of the draft FMP will not prevent or
prejudice the delivery of a dog beach in this general location.
If Council endorses the current
North Alkimos FMP then it will (along with other endorsed FMPs along the
City’s coastline) inform the preparation of Part 2 of the CMP in terms of
beach usage, the assets provided as part of the foreshore development, as well
as the management implications for the City following handover.
Consultation
Administration has consulted the adjacent developing
landowners to the north and south of the FMP area and responded with no
objection. Given that there is currently no legal public access to the coast,
through the proponent land and as there is no existing community within or
adjacent to the foreshore area, Administration recommends that Council endorse
the draft FMP without advertising for public comment.
Comment
The draft FMP acknowledges that the development at
Shorehaven is likely to create an influx of regular visitors to the foreshore
area, and while the foreshore will provide recreational opportunities for the
community, the natural environment will ultimately provide amenity,
biodiversity, and natural stability of the foreshore system.
The draft FMP identifies as a major issue, the risk of
degradation of vegetation that is currently in ‘good to excellent’
condition. In order to overcome this issue, major high-use areas have been
strategically located in areas of “Degraded” and “Completely
Degraded” condition vegetation (i.e. the Village Foreshore Park) to
minimise disturbance to higher condition vegetation. Areas of higher condition
vegetation that will attract visitors will be provided with suitable access and
lookouts to minimise the disturbance to vegetation and landforms while still
allowing the community to enjoy those areas.
Given that the WAPC has already endorsed the draft FMP, the
City and the DEC were the remaining two authorities yet to endorse the
document. Both the City and the DEC have worked together and reviewed the draft
FMP and agreed on a number of changes. Those changes included a more detailed
summary of the requirements of the City’s Local Biodiversity Strategy,
clarification on drainage including deletion of the word ‘sump’ and
clarification of the proposed implementation framework. Administration has
informed the DoP of the comments and revisions required by the City and the
DEC. With the changes having been made to the document Administration now
endorses the updated version of the draft FMP, subject to those additional
minor points raised earlier in this report, also being addressed in the FMP.
If endorsed by Council, Administration recommends the
revised FMP be resubmitted to the WAPC for its endorsement.
Statutory
Compliance
Endorsement of the draft FMP by Council is required to
satisfy approval requirements detailed in Table 8: Reports, Surveys, Strategies
and Plans of the North Alkimos LSP No 73.
There is currently no formal approval process to guide
Council’s assessment of Foreshore Management Plans. Previous FMPs along
more accessible sections of the coastline and adjoining existing communities
have been presented to Council for endorsement to advertise for public comment.
However, advertising of the FMP is considered unnecessary in this instance, for
the reasons stated earlier in the ‘Consultation’ section of this
report.
Where development is proposed that is in accordance with an
approved foreshore management plan, separate planning approval is not required
under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 or MRS. Where development
is proposed that is not in accordance with an approved foreshore management
plan, an application for planning approval under the MRS is required. In
dealing with these applications the City is required to forward the application
to the WAPC within 7 days of receipt for its determination and forward its
comments and recommendations to the WAPC within 42 days of receipt of the
application.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.1 Improve
conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The life-cycle costs and asset management details of all
future works and structures installed in accordance with the proposed FMP, will
be provided to the City in future (by the proponent), prior to the City
accepting handover of those particular coastal areas. The FMP also acknowledges
that the City may require the removal or modification of any works or
infrastructure deemed not feasible to manage, based on life-cycle costs, prior
to accepting handover.
The City will accept handover of public open space (POS)
within the foreshore reserve after two years from practical completion, subject
to compliance with the requirements of clause 7.1 of the City’s Local
Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the draft North Alkimos Foreshore
Management Plan and FORWARDS a copy of the Foreshore Management Plan to the
Western Australian Planning Commission, subject to the following modifications
being made to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning and Sustainability:
1. Design
specifications for fencing and dual use path widths shall be amended to accord
with the City’s standards and requirements;
2. Deletion
of any drainage infrastructure in natural vegetated areas of the foreshore and rationalisation
of swales within the foreshore, to restrict them to active open space areas and
designed to not take in excess of a 1 in 100 year storm event;
3. Provision
being included that requires the proponent to provide, for the City’s
approval, detailed plans and specifications of all future works proposed to be
installed or constructed on land currently managed by or to be handed over to
the City, prior to any such construction occurring; and
4. Amending
Section 7 (Implementation), to make it clear that the City reserves the right
to not accept the management of the foreshore reserve and also reserves the
right to vest management responsibilities of the foreshore reserve in other
governing agencies should it so choose, at any point in time while the
foreshore reserve is under the City’s management.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Shorehaven Development Location
|
11/107998
|
|
|
2.
|
North Alkimos Foreshore Reserve - MRS
|
11/102427
|
|
|
3.
|
Shorehaven Movement Network
|
11/132738
|
|
|
4.
|
Proposed Public Facility and Infrastructure Tables
|
11/107995
|
|
|
5.
|
Typical Works Specifications
|
11/102404
|
|
|
6.
|
Foreshore Blowout Boundaries and Reserves
|
11/107999
|
|
|
7.
|
Staging concept for stabilisation of the blow out
|
11/102398
|
|
|
8.
|
Foreshore landscape plan - Village Foreshore Park
|
11/102419
|
|
|
9.
|
Village Foreshore Park viewsheds
|
11/102412
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary
Council Meeting 13 December, 2011 10
Typical Seating at Small Coastal Node with Sculptural
Element 
as proposed in the draft FMP (reference: Plate 11: page
37)
Large View Deck with associated seating area as
proposed in the draft FMP (reference: Plate 12: page 39)
Small View Deck as proposed in the draft FMP
(reference: Plate 13: page 39)
Typical Beach Access Section as proposed in the draft
FMP (reference: Plate 14: page 41)
Detail of Beach Access Section as proposed in the draft
FMP (reference: Plate 17: page 50)
Typical Footpath Section as proposed in the draft FMP
(reference: Plate 18: page 50)
Typical Fence Detail as proposed in the draft FMP
(reference: Plate 20: page 52)
Typical Entry and Node Feature Fence as proposed in the
draft FMP (reference; Plate 21: page 52)
Primary Path Section with Drainage as proposed in
the draft FMP (reference; Plate 24: page 56)
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
PS02-12/11 Adoption
of East Wangara Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81 - Lots 478 Prestige
Parade & 479 Vision Street, Wangara
File Ref: 2958
– 11/113964
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: None
Attachments: 7
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed East Wangara
Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81 (CSP 81) at the close of
advertising, to determine the modifications required and its acceptability for
final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission
(WAPC) for endorsement.
|
Applicant
|
Taylor Burrell Barnett
|
|
Owner
|
Landcorp
|
|
Location
|
Lots 478 Prestige Parade and 479 Vision Street, Wangara
|
|
Site Area
|
1.1052 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Industrial
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Centre
|
Background
The draft CSP 81 was lodged with the City by Taylor Burrell
Barnett (TBB), on behalf of Landcorp, on 2 May 2011. The Structure Plan area
comprises 1.1052 hectares of land encompassing Lots 478 Prestige Parade and 479
Vision Street, Wangara. The subject lots are located on the corner of Gnangara
Road and Prestige Parade, bound by Gnangara Road to the south, industrial zoned
land to the west, north and south; and rural zoned land to the north east
(refer Attachment 1).
The land is zoned Industrial under the Metropolitan Region
Scheme (MRS) and Centre under District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). Council,
at its meeting on 30 June 2009, considered and endorsed a request to initiate
an amendment to DPS 2 that included the rezoning of Lots 478 Prestige Parade and
479 Vision Street, Wangara from General Industrial Zone to Centre Zone. The
scheme amendment was endorsed by the Minister for Planning on 27 October 2009
and gazetted on 20 November 2009.
On 5 August 2011, following the lodgement of the draft CSP
81 by TBB, the Director Planning and Sustainability forwarded a memorandum to
all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral
of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests
were received and advertising of the draft CSP 81 subsequently commenced in
accordance with Clause 9.5 of DPS 2 on 12 August 2011 for a period of 42 days,
closing on 4 October 2011.
Detail
The draft CSP 81 has been prepared in order to satisfy the
requirements of the ‘Centre’ zone under DPS 2 and to facilitate a
commercial centre to service employees in the Wangara and Landsdale Industrial
Estates.
The key elements of the draft CSP 81 are as follows:
· Lot
478 is zoned ‘Business’ and Lot 479 is zoned
‘Commercial’;
· No
retail uses are to be permitted on Lot 478, while Lot 479 will be permitted a
maximum of 1,750m2 NLA retail floorspace; and
· Land
use permissibility for Lots 478 and 479 has been varied from the Zoning Table
in DPS 2.
Attachment 2 contains the advertised version of the
Part 1 Statutory Section of draft CSP 81, including the draft Structure Plan
Map.
Consultation
The draft CSP was advertised for public comment for a period
of 42 days by means of on-site signage, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times
newspaper, the City’s website and letters to nearby landowners. The
advertising period commenced on 12 August 2011 and closed on 4 October 2011,
with a total of seven submissions received, five of which had no objection to
the proposal and two which expressed specific concerns with the proposal. A
summary of all submissions received, together with Administration’s
response to each is included as Attachment 3.
In accordance with the City’s Local Planning Policy
4.2 – Structure Planning (LPP 4.2), Administration also conducted its
assessment of draft CSP 81 during the advertising period.
Administration’s recommended modifications arising from its assessment
are included as Attachment 4.
The main issues identified in Administration’s
assessment and the submissions received relate to:
· Permissibility
of uses and land use conflicts with the surrounding industrial area; and
· Traffic
impacts on the surrounding road networks.
A more detailed discussion of the abovementioned issues is
provided in the Comment section of this report.
Comment
Permissibility of Uses and Land Use Conflicts
Lots 478 Prestige Parade and 479 Vision Street, Wangara were
rezoned from General Industrial to Centre under Amendment No. 73 to DPS 2,
which was endorsed at the 30 June 2009 Council Meeting and gazetted on 20
November 2009. The primary objective of this rezoning was to provide a mix of
commercial based activities to cater to the needs of the employees of the
surrounding industrial estates. The preparation of CSP 81 will facilitate this
by zoning the subject lots ‘Commercial’ and ‘Business’,
and determining the land use permissibility of these zones. The advertised
version of CSP 81 proposed a number of land use controls (refer Attachment 2).
However a number of sensitive land uses proposed are considered incompatible
with the surrounding ‘General Industrial’ zoned area and do not
meet the objectives of CSP 81.
Recommended separation distances between industrial and
sensitive land uses are outlined in the Environmental Protection
Authority’s (EPA’s) ‘Guidance for the Assessment of
Environmental Factors (in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act
1986) Separation Distances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses’
Guidance Statement (June 2005). The purpose of these generic separation
distances (buffers) is to avoid conflicts between incompatible land uses.
Considering the Wangara area has historically been a general industrial area,
it is of primary importance that the land use permissibility in proposed CSP 81
area does not prejudice the existing and future development of the adjoining
General Industrial Zone.
Lots 78 & 80 Gnangara Road, Landsdale, which are
adjacent to the CSP 81 area, have approval for and are currently operating as
concrete batching plants, while Lot 79 Attwell Street, Landsdale, has an
approval to be used for and is currently operating as a waste processing and
transfer facility. Both of these uses could potentially impact upon sensitive
land uses located in CSP 81. The separation distance for a concrete batching
plant is between 300-500m, and is the shortest distance measured from the
boundary of an area used for an industrial land use and the boundary of an area
used by a sensitive land use. Attachment 5 shows the Centre Zoned land
subject of CSP 81 and the surrounding General Industrial zoned land. This
reinforces the industrial nature of the surrounding area and the need to ensure
CSP 81 does not allow sensitive land uses or development that would be impacted
upon by existing adjacent industrial operations or preclude general industrial
development from occurring in the surrounding area in the future.
Under the EPA’s Guidance Statement, sensitive land use
is defined as:
‘Sensitive land use –
land use sensitive to emissions from industry and infrastructure. Sensitive
land uses include residential development, hospitals, hotels, motels, hostels,
caravan parks, schools, nursing homes, child care facilities, shopping centres,
playgrounds and some public buildings. Some commercial, institutional and
industrial land uses which require high levels of amenity or are sensitive to
particular emissions may also be considered “sensitive land uses”.
Examples include some retail outlets, offices and training centres, and some
types of storage and manufacturing.’
Similarly, under the DPS 2, a sensitive use is defined as:
‘Sensitive Use:
means any use in which the people involved in that use may have reason to
object to noise, dust, odour and other impacts which may arise from rural
resource operations and includes, but is not limited to, residential,
hospitals, schools, shops and all public establishments where food and drink is
consumed.’
Though it is recognised that the definition of sensitive use
under DPS 2 makes reference to ‘rural resource operations’ only, it
(together with the EPA’s definition for sensitive land use) does serve to
provide guidance on land use types that are considered sensitive.
Administration is recommending that the permissibility of a
number of sensitive land uses be amended in CSP 81 in order to reduce the
potential impact and conflict with the surrounding general industrial area.
Administration advises that sensitive land uses under CSP 81 have been
designated as either ‘A’ uses (meaning a use that is prohibited
until advertising has been undertaken and Council has exercised its discretion
to otherwise approve the use) or ‘X’ uses (meaning a prohibited
land use). A comparison between the permissibility of land uses in the Business
and Commercial Zones under DPS 2 and the permissibilities proposed by
Administration for CSP 81 is included in Attachment 6.
Traffic Impacts on the Surrounding Road Networks
A submission by the Department of Transport (DoT) raised the
issue that the rezoning of Lot 478 Prestige Parade to ‘Business’
and Lot 479 Vision Street to ‘Commercial’ would result in a
significant increase in traffic movements and impact the surrounding road
network. Administration considers that the development of the two subject lots
within the CSP area is unlikely to have any significant traffic impacts on the
surrounding road network, given that vehicle access to and from the subject
lots, and consideration of any potential effects that the development of the
CSP area may have on the traffic movements of the surrounding road network, can
be addressed by a detailed area plan (DAP) and through the development
assessment process. At that more detailed stage of the planning process, when
the specific land uses are proposed, a traffic impact assessment can be
required if necessary.
Technical Appendices
The City’s LPP 4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2)
requires the lodgement of Part 3 – Technical Supporting Documentation for
a centre structure plan. This part of the structure plan is required to contain
a number of technical reports, including the following:
· Local
Environmental Impact Assessment and Management Strategy;
· Local
Water Management Strategy;
· Local
Engineering Infrastructure Report;
· Local
Transport Strategy;
· Local
Community Development Strategy; and
· Local
Heritage Strategy.
These technical reports have not been included as part of
the Part 3 lodged, as required under LPP 4.2. The CSP 81 area forms part of the
broader Agreed Structure Plan No. 10 – East Wanneroo Cell 8 and adjoining
lots to its south have already been subdivided and developed. In light of this
and together with the limited extent of the structure plan, Administration
considers that these reports are not required to be provided as part of this
structure plan proposal. Matters dealt with by these reports have previously
been addressed through earlier structure planning, scheme amendment and
subdivision processes. Thus, it is recommended that the requirement for the
preparation of these technical reports should be waived in this instance.
Conclusion
Lots 478 Prestige Parade and 479 Vision Street, Wangara are
zoned ‘Centre’ under DPS 2. In accordance with the provisions
of DPS 2, Council may require a structure plan as a prerequisite to subdivision
and development in the Centre zone. Draft CSP 81 has thus been prepared for the
subject lots and submitted for the City’s consideration and approval.
Draft CSP 81 is considered to be satisfactory for final
approval by the City, subject to modifications as discussed above and depicted
in Administration’s tracked changes version of the Part 1 –
Statutory Section of the draft CSP, included as Attachment 7. These
modifications include the recommended changes to the land use permissibilities
for the CSP 81 area.
Statutory
Compliance
This Structure Plan has been processed in accordance with
the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following
advertisement of a Structure Plan, Council may refuse to adopt the Structure
Plan or resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without modifications.
It is recommended that draft CSP 81 be approved subject to the modifications
recommended in Attachments 3 and 4 of this report.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“3 Economic
3.1 Create
strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands”
Policy
Implications
The proposal has been processed in accordance with the
City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2 – Structure Planning.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2,
RESOLVES that the draft East Wangara Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81
submitted by Taylor Burrell Barnett, on behalf of Landcorp, is satisfactory
subject to the Recommended Modifications contained within Attachment 3 and
Attachment 4 being made to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and
Sustainability;
2. REFERS
the East Wangara Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81 to the
Western Australian Planning Commission for approval in accordance with Clause
9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2;
3. NOTES
the Schedule of Submissions provided in Attachment 3, ENDORSES
Administration’s recommended responses to those submissions and FORWARDS
that Schedule to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES
submitters of its decision; and
4. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS
the duly modified East Wangara Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No. 81
documents and AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL
the documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Site Plan
|
11/117410
|
|
|
2.
|
Part 1 Statutory Section
|
11/117412
|
|
|
3.
|
Summary of submissions, responses and recommended
modifications
|
11/129247
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Summary of CoW Administration Comments
|
11/128921
|
|
|
5.
|
Zoning Plan
|
11/128844
|
|
|
6.
|
Table Showing Comparison of Use Class Permissibility
between DPS 2 and CSP 81
|
11/128912
|
|
|
7.
|
Recommended Modifications for Part 1 Statutory
Section
|
11/128913
|
|
PS03-12/11 Adoption
of Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88
File Ref: 5396
– 11/123705
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 14
Issue
To consider the submissions on the proposed draft Jindalee
North Local Structure Plan No. 88 (LSP 88) to determine the modifications
required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for its adoption.
|
Applicant
|
Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners
|
|
Owner
|
Ocean Springs Pty Ltd; Butler Land Company Pty Ltd; and
Department of Housing
|
|
Location
|
Lot 9 (2559) Marmion Avenue, Jindalee;
Lot 6002 (2559A) Marmion Avenue, Jindalee; and
Portion of Lot 9055 (2500) Marmion Avenue, Butler
|
|
Site Area
|
108 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban Zone and Parks and Recreation Reserve
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development Zone and Parks and Recreation Reserve
|
Background
The draft LSP 88 was submitted
on 15 March 2011 for the City’s consideration. On 5 August 2011, the
Director, Planning and Sustainability forwarded a memorandum to all Elected
Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral of the
proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests were
received and, as such, advertising of the draft LSP 88 commenced in accordance
with Clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Detail
The Site
Attachment 1 contains the location plan of the
structure plan area. The subject land is bounded by Lots 1002 and 9002 Marmion
Avenue, Alkimos to the north, Lot 10, Marmion Avenue, Jindalee to the south,
Marmion Avenue and Brighton Estate to the east and Foreshore Reserve to the
west. The eastern portion of the land has been cleared and bulk earth-worked in
2006 (DA2006/618 dated 7 September 2006).
The characteristics of the site are as follows:
· The
site has a number of dominant landform features which provide an excellent
opportunity to create a strong sense of place for development and to enhance
views along the coast. On an average, the land slopes westwards at 1 in 55
gradient;
· Unlikely
occurrence of any karstic features;
· No
naturally occurring water courses or water bodies;
· Depth
of groundwater varying between 11 metres along the western side to 35 metres
along the eastern side;
· Located
within Priority 3 Groundwater Source Protection Area;
· No
Threatened Ecological Communities present;
· Carnaby’s
Black Cockatoos have been recorded within the proximity of the site but with
only limited suitable foraging habitat known on the site;
· Lomandra
maritime being a known habitat species for Graceful Sun Moth (GSM) is known to
be present on the site. A total 15 GSMs have been recorded; and
· One
Aboriginal Heritage Site located within the LSP area. No European heritage
sites are present on the site.
Zoning
While the entire area of land subject to LSP 88 is zoned
Urban under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and Urban Development in DPS
2, 3.7 hectares of land located in the north-western portion of the site
abutting the Foreshore Reserve is reserved as Parks and Recreation Reserve. A
portion of the Foreshore Reserve including the Parks and Recreation Reserve
located within the subject land is classified as Bush Forever Site No. 397.
The Proposal
Attachment
2 contains the Statutory Section of the draft LSP 88, as advertised, which
includes the Structure Plan Map, the Zoning Map and the Residential Density
Range Map.
The details of the draft LSP 88
are as follows:
Zoning
The LSP area is predominantly
zoned Residential except for the Coastal Village Precinct and the centrally
located local centre, which are zoned Centre and Commercial respectively.
Local Centres
Two local centres with a retail
floor space of maximum 500m2 and 300m2 respectively are
proposed. The 500m2 local centre is centrally located and the other
local centre is proposed within the Coastal Village Precinct. As it is proposed
to zone the Coastal Village Precinct as ‘Centre’, which requires that
it be subject to separate structure planning, the LSP 88 maps do not indicate
the location of the coastal local centre.
Residential
It is proposed to provide
approximately 1,590 single lots/units with residential densities ranging from
R30 to R100. The LSP 88 area is divided into four residential precincts namely,
Coastal Village Precinct, Coastal Fringe Precinct, Central West Precinct and
Marmion East Precinct (refer Attachment 3). As per the advertised
version of the LSP, a density code range of R80 - R100 is proposed for the
Coastal Village Precinct with R80 being the base coding and R100 being
applicable where it is proposed to develop multiple dwellings. In regard to the
other three precincts, a density code range of R30 - R60 is proposed with R30
being the base code while the location of R60 lots will be determined on the
basis of locational criteria.
It is proposed to vary some of
the provisions of the Residential Design Codes (R Codes) relating to setbacks,
private open space, boundary walls, and ancillary accommodation in areas coded
R30 and R60. The provisions of R Codes will apply in respect to the R80 and
R100 developments.
POS areas
The draft LSP 88 makes provision
of 10.44 hectares of Public Open Space (POS) areas. This provision is greater
than the minimum 10% (10.14 hectares) required under the WAPC’s Liveable
Neighbourhoods Policy. The draft LSP 88 maps depict only the strategic POS
areas. The remaining POS areas will be provided at the subdivision stage.
An Aboriginal heritage site has
been identified on a small ridge along the northern boundary of the LSP area.
It is proposed to protect this site within a 4,000m2 ‘U’
shaped park.
Primary School
A Primary School site of 3.5
hectares is centrally co-located with an active POS area of 2.2 hectares at the
south-western corner of two Neighbourhood Connectors. The POS will contain a
junior oval. The periphery of the POS is proposed to accommodate a drainage
swale.
Movement Network
The LSP area is connected to Marmion Avenue via two
Neighbourhood Connectors. The northern intersection is proposed to allow
left-in/left-out and right-in movement only. The southern intersection will be
signalised as a four-way intersection with Camborne Parkway to the east within
Brighton Estate.
The Neighbourhood Connectors are proposed with a reserve
width of 20 metres excepting the Neighbourhood connector linking Marmion Avenue
and the foreshore which is proposed to be 24 metres wide due to the estimated
volume of traffic. These roads are proposed to contain a shared path on at
least one side of the road with a pathway on the opposite side.
There are opportunities to provide feeder bus connections
through the LSP 88 area connecting to the future Brighton train station, which
would be located about one kilometre to the east of the LSP 88 area.
The Access Streets, not shown on the LSP maps, are proposed
to have a reserve width ranging between 15 and 20 metres depending on the
traffic volumes.
Drainage
The drainage system will be designed based on water
sensitive design principles. Four drainage catchment areas are identified. The
drainage swales of catchments 2 and 4, which abut the Foreshore, would partly
affect a portion of the Foreshore Reserve.
Consultation
The draft LSP was advertised for public comment for a period
of 42 days by means of two on-site signs, an advertisement in the Wanneroo
Times newspaper and the City’s website and letters to adjoining
landowners. The submission period commenced on 23 August and closed on 4
October 2011. The City received ten submissions, nine of them were from
government agencies and one from Roberts Day Town Planners on behalf of the
owners of Lot 10, Marmion Avenue, Jindalee located to the immediate south of
the subject land.
The main issues raised in the submissions are as follows:
· Opposition
to the coastal local centre in close proximity to the planned Jindee Coastal
Village;
· That
the northern intersection of the Neighbourhood Connector and Marmion Avenue be
a left-in/left-out intersection only;
· That
POS areas 4 and 5 be denoted as Conservation POS areas and that the necessary
provisions be included in the statutory section of the LSP 88 requiring
Conservation Management Plans; and
· Objection
to proposing drainage swales within the foreshore reserve affecting Bush
Forever Site 397.
A summary of submissions received and Administration’s
responses are provided in Attachment 4. This summary makes reference to Attachments
5 to 11.
Comment
The applicant originally named
this LSP as Lot 9 Jindalee LSP. As the site comprises of three lot numbers, the
applicant has renamed it to the Jindalee North LSP 88 and resubmitted the
statutory section of the LSP with some modifications (refer Attachment 12).
The modifications replace the proposed density range of R30 - R60 applicable to
the Coastal Fringe Precinct, Central West Precinct and Marmion East Precinct
with a dual coding of R30/60 and to code the entire Coastal Village Precinct as
R100 by deleting the range of R80 - R100. The reason for providing dual coding
instead of a range is that the developer does not propose to develop R40 and
R80 lots but only R30, R60 and R100 lots within the LSP 88 area. The LSP maps
have been modified by depicting larger POS 4 and 5 areas as requested by the
DEC to accommodate the Graceful Sun Moth habitats.
Agreed Butler-Jindalee
District Structure Plan No. 39 (DSP 39)
The LSP 88 area forms part of
DSP 39, which establishes the district level planning network. Attachment 13
contains a copy of DSP 39 indicating the LSP area. DSP 39 was adopted by the
City in November 2005 and by the WAPC on 20 October 2006. As per the statutory
provisions of DSP 39, it provides the general basis for the preparation of
LSPs.
DSP 39 identifies the following
key elements that are relevant to the draft LSP 88:
· A
predominantly residential area;
· A
centrally located Local Centre with a retail floor space in the range of 250 to
600m2;
· An
east-west road connecting Marmion Avenue and the Foreshore;
· Two
north-south connector roads including a coastal foreshore access road allowing
connectivity with the future development to the north and south; and
· A
centrally located Primary School.
Based on the general principles of DSP 39, the
applicant has prepared the draft LSP 88.
In addition to the matters discussed in the
summary of submissions, the following additional comments are made on the draft
LSP 88.
Residential Zone
Coastal Fringe, Central West and Marmion East
Precincts
While the Coastal Village
Precinct is proposed to be coded R100 in its entirety, the applicant has
proposed a dual coding of R30/60 in respect to the Coastal Fringe Precinct,
Central West Precinct and Marmion East Precinct. The determination of R30 and R60
coding in these three precincts is proposed to be based on the following:
While R30 will be the base code
in these precincts, the location of R60 lots will be determined as per the
following locational criteria:
1. Vehicular access to a laneway;
2. Located in proximity to public
transport routes and neighbourhood connectors;
3. Within 400 metres to a local
centre or Primary School;
4. Proximity to public open
space; and
5. Within Central Fringe Precinct.
The above criteria are generally
in accordance with the City’s Local Housing Strategy, which recommends
higher densities of R30 and R40 within 250 to 400 metres of high amenity areas
such public open space and bus routes. The locational criteria 2 and 4 mentioned
above do not indicate a distance. But an assessment of the LSP indicates that
the proposed R60 laneway lots are likely to be located within 250 to 400 metres
from the areas of high amenity.
In regard to the fifth criterion
above, the applicant has advised that although it is the intention to develop
the entire Central Fringe Precinct to R60 standards, in order to accommodate
some possible R30 lots, this precinct is included as one of the criteria to
locate R60 lots.
In considering the above matters,
the proposed locational criteria are supported.
Centre Zone
The coastal node area identified as Coastal Village Precinct
has been proposed to be zoned Centre in the draft LSP 88. The applicant advised
that the intention of zoning this precinct as Centre was to arrive at more
appropriate development control measures to achieve a desired urban form at the
structure planning stage. As these matters could, however, be addressed through
Detailed Area Plans and as the land use of this precinct is predominantly
residential, it is recommended that the Centre Zone not be accepted and that
the area be zoned as Residential instead, except for the coastal local centre
which can be zoned Commercial. The applicant has agreed to make this
modification.
Coastal Setback Assessment
The Coastal Setback Assessment report submitted by the
applicant recommends that the draft LSP 88 may be amended to accommodate the
Physical Process Setback (PPS), which extends into the LSP 88 area. Attachment
14 contains a plan showing the PPS affecting the south-western corner of
the LSP 88 area. Accordingly, the applicant has agreed to modify the draft LSP
by shifting the residential area affected by the PPS by approximately 20 metres
behind the cadastral boundary and to depict the affected portion as a POS area.
Variations to R Code
provisions
The applicant has requested variations to some of the
provisions of the R Codes relating to R30 and R60 that are generally in line
with the R Code variations currently available in the Butler-Ridgewood Agreed
Structure Plan No.27 (ASP 27) and Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
(ASP 21A) adopted by the WAPC and the City.
These variations are discussed below:
a. Setback
(relating R Code Provision 6.2)
A minimum primary street setback
of 2.0 metres is proposed. A maximum primary street setback is not proposed in
order to provide more flexibility in locating a dwelling depending on the site
conditions and the design of the dwelling.
A minimum rear setback of 0.5m for
garages abutting a 6 metre wide laneway and 1.0 metre where garages abut a 5
metre wide laneway, similar to the provisions in ASP 27.
b. Open
Space (relating R Code provision 6.4)
i) R30
Lots
It
is proposed to reduce the minimum open space from 45% to 30% for R30 lots with
a frontage less than 13 metres and 45% to 40% for R30 lots with frontage
greater than 13 metres, subject to providing a 2 metre solar setback to
habitable rooms with major openings on the northernmost or easternmost side
boundary and to provide 24m2 outdoor living area on the northernmost
or easternmost side boundary. If the outdoor living area is not accessible from
an internal living area, an additional outdoor living area of 20m2
will be required. This provision is currently available in ASP 27.
ii) R60
lots
In
regard to R60 lots, it is proposed to reduce the open space to 25%, subject to
providing useable space of 24m2. This provision is currently
available in ASP 21A.
c. Boundary
Walls (relating R Code provision 6.3)
The following boundary
wall provisions similar to those in ASP 21A are proposed:
|
Item
|
Single Storey (metre)
|
Two Storey and Above
(metre)
|
|
Maximum height
|
3.5
|
6.5
|
|
Maximum length
|
No limit
|
Up to 12.0
|
d. Ancillary
Accommodation (relating R Code Provision 6.11)
The R Codes do not allow ancillary accommodation for lots
less than 450m2 in area. In considering the possibility of enabling
the provision of a studio apartment above a garage in areas coded R30 and
above, it is proposed to allow ancillary accommodation on lots less than 450 m2
in area. As a double garage is generally about 40m2 in area, the
maximum area of an ancillary accommodation is limited to 40m2. An
additional car parking bay for ancillary accommodation is not recommended for
the following reasons:
· Considering
an average site area of 300m2 and 180m2 for R30 and R60
lots respectively and the proposed reduction in the minimum open space for
these lots resulting in greater site coverage for dwellings, an additional car
bay for ancillary accommodation within these lots may not be feasible; and
· The
LSP 88 area is proposed to be connected by bus routes along the central
north-south Neighbourhood Connector and along Marmion Avenue. These bus routes
are located within 400 metres walking distance.
e. POS
Interface
Similar to the provisions of ASP 27 and ASP 21A, lots abutting
a POS are required to be orientated towards the POS area with a minimum of one
habitable room (excluding bedroom) to face towards the POS area. Although the R
Codes define a bedroom as a habitable room, considering its limited occupancy
during the day time, it is not classified as a habitable room for the purpose
of providing surveillance of the POS area. The only departure from ASP 27
provisions is that a dwelling on a lot abutting POS within the LSP 88 area is
proposed to be setback at 1.0 metre compared to 3.0 metres proposed in ASP 27.
Given that the dwelling adjoins a POS area, 1.0 metre setback is considered
appropriate. A provision is proposed to allow a visually permeable fence on the
boundary with the POS area.
As the above mentioned variations are currently available in
other Agreed Structure Plans such as ASP 21 A, and they have proven to work
effectively, it is recommended that these variations be included in the draft
LSP 88.
In addition to the above variations the applicant is
proposing single garages/car ports including tandem parking for lots less that
10 metres frontage, to ensure that garages do not dominate the primary
street. This provision is considered reasonable and is therefore
supported.
Conclusion
Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners have submitted the
draft LSP Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88 for the City’s
consideration. The LSP makes provision for predominantly residential
development with two local centres. Being located within the DSP 39 area, the
draft LSP 88 has been prepared considering the principles of DSP 39. Following
the public comment period, the draft LSP 88 contained in Attachment 12
has been assessed and is considered to be acceptable, subject to modifications
contained in Attachment 4. It is recommended that the draft LSP 88 be
considered satisfactory under subclause 9.7.1 of DPS 2 and forwarded to the
WAPC for its adoption.
Statutory
Compliance
Draft LSP 88 has been processed in accordance with the
requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following
advertisement of a Structure Plan, Council may refuse to adopt the Structure
Plan or resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without
modifications. It is recommended that the Local Structure Plan be approved with
modifications.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise
impact of development on the environment”
1.4 Improve the
quality of built environment; and
2 Social
1.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options; and
2.4 Improve
transport options and connections.”
Policy
Implications
The draft LSP 88 has been assessed as per the provisions of
the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.3: Structure Planning.
Financial
Implications
Nil.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, RESOLVES that the draft
Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88 as submitted by Chappell Lambert
Everett Town Planners on behalf of Ocean Springs Pty Ltd, Butler Development
Company and Housing Authority and as outlined in Attachment 12 to this report
is satisfactory, subject to the following modifications being undertaken to the
satisfaction of the Director, Planning and Sustainability:
Part 1 – Statutory Section
a) Text
(i) To
include a provision requiring the preparation of Conservation Management Plan
for the Conservation Public Open Spaces;
(ii) To
include a provision ensuring that residential lots do not abut the foreshore
reserve;
(iii) To modify
Table C to include the coastal local centre with a maximum retail floor space
of 300 m2;
b) Structure Plan
(i) To
identify the 3.45 hectare and 3.22 hectare strategic Public Open Space located
to the immediate north of the east-west Neighbourhood Connector as Conservation
Public Open Space;
(ii) To delete
the drainage swales of the Catchment areas 2 and 4 located within the Foreshore
and to accommodate them within the structure plan area;
(iii) To depict the
northern intersection of the Neighbourhood Connector and Marmion Avenue as
left-in/left-out intersection only and to delete the right-in notation;
(iv) To modify
Figure 15 – Road Hierarchy and Arterial Access in Part 2 - Explanatory
Report and Figure 2 - Road Hierarchy and Arterial Access of the Traffic Report
in Part 3 by deleting the southernmost intersection of a Neighbourhood
Connector and Marmion Avenue as it is situated outside the structure plan area;
(v) To delete the
residential area affected by the Physical Process Setback as shown on
Attachment 14 to this report by 20 metres from the cadastral boundary of Lot 9,
Marmion Avenue, Jindalee and to depict the affected area as a Public Open
Space;
(vi) To zone the
Centre Zone as Residential Zone; and
(vii) To locate and zone
the Coastal Local Centre as Commercial Zone.
Part 2 – Explanatory Report
(i) To
include a path network plan in Section 6.0 - Movement Network by also depicting
the Regional Recreation Shared Path adjacent to the foreshore.
2. Upon
receipt of the documents modified in accordance with 1 above, FORWARDS the
draft Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88 to the Western Australian
Planning Commission for its adoption and certification:
3. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the
Jindalee North Local Structure Plan No. 88 documents once certified by the
Western Australian Planning Commission; and
4. NOTES
the summary of submissions received on the draft Jindalee North Local Structure
Plan No. 88 included as Attachment 4, ENDORSES Administration’s responses
to those submissions, FORWARDS the summary of submissions to the Western
Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127244
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127245
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127791
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - LSP 88
|
11/128644
|
Minuted
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 5 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127247
|
|
|
6.
|
Attachment 6 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127249
|
|
|
7.
|
Attachment 7 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127250
|
|
|
8.
|
Attachment 8 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127252
|
|
|
9.
|
Attachment 9 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127253
|
|
|
10.
|
Attachment 10 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127255
|
|
|
11.
|
Attachment 11 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127811
|
|
|
12.
|
Attachment 12 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127892
|
Minuted
|
|
13.
|
Attachment 13 - Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127808
|
|
|
14.
|
Attachment 14- Lot 9 LSP
|
11/127257
|
|
CITY OF
WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 13 December, 2011 81
Development Applications
PS04-12/11 Proposed
Extension to Ocean Keys Shopping Centre, Clarkson - DA09/1266
File Ref: DA09/1266
– 11/87990
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 10
Issue
To consider an application for proposed extensions and
alterations to the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre in Clarkson following the public
comment period and adoption of Amendment No. 6 to the Clarkson District Centre
Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 (ASP 2) by the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC) and the City.
|
Applicant
|
Greg Rowe & Associates
|
|
Owner
|
AMP Royal Randwick Pty Ltd
|
|
Location
|
Lot 406 (36) Ocean Keys Boulevard, Clarkson
|
|
Site Area
|
7.6300 hectares (ha)
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Centre
|
|
Clarkson District Centre ASP 2 Zoning
|
Commercial
|
Background
The Development Application
In November 2009, Greg Rowe and Associates, on behalf of AMP
Royal Randwick Pty Ltd, submitted an application seeking approval for proposed
extensions and alterations to the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre in Clarkson. The
shopping centre is generally bounded by Ocean Keys Boulevard to the north,
Pensacola Terrace to the west, a laneway to the south and Key Largo Drive to
the east and includes a service station located at the south-eastern corner of
Marmion Avenue and Pensacola Terrace. Attachment 1 contains the
location plan of the shopping centre.
Currently, the shopping centre has a retail floor space of
21,690m2 net lettable area (NLA) consisting of two supermarkets, a
Discount Department Store (DDS), speciality shops, kiosks, K Auto and service
station. A total car parking supply of 1,196 bays is available on-site. 204
bays are available in the basement car park near K Auto accessible from
Pensacola Terrace and the remaining bays in the main car park are accessible
from Key Largo Drive and the laneway.
It is proposed to increase the retail floor space of the
shopping centre by 13,794m2 NLA to include a new DDS, two mini
majors, speciality shops and kiosks and a new east-west mall running parallel
to the existing mall. When developed, the total retail floor space of the
shopping centre will be 35,484m2 NLA. Attachment 2 contains
the plans showing the existing shopping centre and the proposed extension.
Prior to and since the submission of the development
application, the applicant has had several meetings with Administration to
discuss the proposal in detail. Through the meetings, Administration has
conveyed to the applicant the need to ensure that the proposal meets the
requirements of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and ASP 2 to deliver a
development that would create streetscapes that are interesting, of a high
quality and activated.
ASP 2
The shopping centre is located within the ASP 2 area (refer Attachment
3) and is subject to the provisions of ASP 2. One of the provisions of ASP
2 is to limit the maximum retail floor space within the Clarkson District
Centre (including the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre) to 28,800m2 NLA.
As the overall retail floor space of the shopping centre,
when extended, would exceed the maximum retail floor space limit, the applicant
in November 2009 lodged an amendment (No. 6) to ASP 2, which among other
matters sought to remove the limitation on the retail floor space. No further
action on the development application could be taken until such time the
proposed amendment was adopted by the WAPC and the City.
Following a public comment period, Council at its meeting of
27 July 2010 resolved that the amendment was satisfactory subject to
modifications (Item PS03-07/10). On 19 September 2011, the WAPC resolved to
adopt the amendment subject to modifications. Subsequently, Council at its
meeting of 11 October 2011 considered the modifications required by the WAPC
and resolved to modify the amendment document accordingly (Item PS06-10/11).
The provisions of the amendment relevant to the shopping centre are as follows:
· No
retail floor space limit shall apply;
· Stage
1 of any additional development shall comprise of an expansion of no more than
13,642m2 retail NLA;
· A
minimum of ten residential apartments being integrated with the shopping centre
fronting Ocean Keys Boulevard and/or Key Large Drive;
· Car
parking within the structure plan area should be provided within a range of 4.5
to 6.0 bays per 100m2 of floor space. The Traffic Impact Assessment
should assess the rate of provision for major applications; and
· In
the Commercial Zone, Council, at its discretion, may reduce the number of car
parking bays for ‘retail’ development at a rate not lower than 4.5
bays per 100m2.
As the shopping centre site is zoned Commercial in ASP 2,
the applicant submitted modified plans (included as Attachment 4)
proposing car parking bays at the optimum discretionary rate of 4.5 bays per
100m2 for the retail development. The modified plans also addressed
the traffic issues raised by Administration relating to the improvements to the
laneway, the intersection of Key Largo Drive and to the laneway and the
intersection of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Marmion Avenue. These modified
plans are now the subject of this development application for the shopping
centre’s expansion.
Detail
The details of the proposal are as follows:
As per the provisions of ASP 2, Ocean Keys Boulevard and Key
Largo Drive have been identified as a Main Street and a Transitional Street
respectively.
The buildings with ‘Nil’ front setback are
oriented towards Ocean Keys Boulevard with predominantly active frontages and
no blank facades. Awnings are proposed to give pedestrians protection from the
weather.
The multi-level car park and the DDS fronting Key Largo
Drive are setback from Key Largo Drive providing a transition area between
these buildings and Key Largo Drive to allow for future additions and
development of buildings fronting and addressing the street. In this regard
and in response to the requirement to provide a residential component within
the redevelopment, this transition area incorporates ten multiple dwellings.
Additional floor space
In addition to the existing 21,690m2 retail NLA
available in the shopping centre, the applicant has proposed 13,244m2
retail NLA (which is less than the maximum 13,692m2 retail NLA
provided in ASP 2). In addition to this retail floor space, 550m2 of
commercial NLA has been proposed to accommodate ‘non-retail’ land
uses such as ‘Office’. Therefore, when developed, the shopping
centre will have an overall retail floor space of 34,934m2 NLA and a
commercial floor space of 550m2 NLA. The overall total floor space
in the shopping centre will be 35,484m2, as originally proposed by the
applicant.
Car parking provision
The number of car parking bays proposed are as per the
following table:
|
Land use
|
NLA (m2)
|
Rate of parking bays
|
Number of bays
|
|
Retail
|
34,934
|
4.5 bays per 100m2 (as per ASP 2)
|
1,572
|
|
Commercial
|
550
|
3.3 per 100m2
(as per DPS 2)
|
18
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,590
|
The 1,590 car bays are proposed to be distributed as
follows:
|
Parking area
|
No. of bays
|
|
Basement
|
204
|
|
Multi-level car park
|
1,342
|
|
K Auto
|
15
|
|
Service Station
|
29
|
|
Total
|
1,590
|
Access to the multi-level car park is proposed via Ocean
Keys Boulevard with left-in/left-out movement only, and via Key Largo Drive and
the laneway with full movement.
Movement Network
The proposal makes the following provisions in terms of the
existing movement network:
· Improvements
to the 70 degree bend on the laneway located at the south-western corner of the
shopping centre to ensure smooth movement of trucks and other vehicles (refer Attachment
5);
· Widening
the carriageway of the laneway from 5.5 to 6.5 metres between the car park
driveway to the upper level car park and Key Largo Drive and to improve the
intersection of Key Largo Drive and the laneway (refer Attachment 6);
and
· Relocating
the driveway to the car park currently located at the intersection of Key Largo
Drive and Caribbean Circuit in a southerly direction by approximately 40 metres
between Caribbean Circuit and The Straits to provide access to the proposed
multi-level car park. This driveway will also provide access to the new service
area for the proposed DDS.
Servicing
New service areas off Key Largo Drive and the laneway are
proposed for the DDS and Mini Major 2 and another service area is proposed off
Ocean Keys Boulevard to service Mini Major 1.
Residential Component
As per the provisions of ASP 2, the applicant has proposed
10 multiple dwellings integrated with the shopping centre at the corner of
Ocean Keys Boulevard and Key Largo Drive overlooking Key Largo Drive. Six of
these dwellings are 1-bedroom units and the remaining four are 2-bedroom units.
Five units (three 1-bedroom units and two 2-bedroom units) along with five
store rooms are proposed adjoining the middle deck level of the car park and
the other five units along with five store rooms are proposed adjoining the
upper deck of the car park. At the ground floor level, a residential
lobby is proposed to provide access to a lift and a flight of stairs.
A residential parking area for 16 bays and a bin storage
area for 20 bins are proposed at ground level. The car park gains access off
Ocean Keys Boulevard. The car park and the ground floor residential lobby can
be accessed from the forecourt located at the corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard
and Key Largo Drive via two separate doors. The landscaped forecourt is surrounded
by buildings on three sides.
Consultation
The original proposal (refer Attachment 2) submitted
in November 2009 was subject to public consultation for a period of 28 days
between 10 August and 7 September 2010 by way of placing three on-site signs,
an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times, a notice on the City’s website
and letters to the adjoining landowners. At the conclusion of the comment
period, 11 submissions were received. The main issues raised in the submissions
relate to:
· Width
of the laneway being too narrow to accommodate the additional traffic; and
· Insufficient
provision of car parking bays;
A summary of submissions and Administration’s
responses are contained in Attachment 7. The summary of submissions
makes reference to Attachment 8.
Additionally, this proposal was briefly discussed at the
Council Forum on 22 November 2011.
Comment
Car parking Provision
Sub-section 7.5.3(l) of ASP 2 states that in the Commercial
Zone, the number of car parking bays for retail developments may be reduced, at
Council’s discretion, to a rate not lower than 4.5 bays per 100m2
of floor space where the total number of bays on the site exceeds 500 bays. At
this rate, the shopping centre will require 1,590 bays as demonstrated above.
Including the 16 bays required for the residential component of the proposal,
the total number of bays required will be 1,606.
A reduced rate of 4.5 bays per 100m2 is supported
for the following reasons:
· The
reciprocal use of parking bays that can occur in light of the variety of uses
within the broader district centre. In this regard it is noted that many uses,
such as video stores, fast food outlets, taverns, restaurants, cafes, and the
like, do not peak in demand for parking at the same time as a retail shop. On
this basis, the requirement for all uses at a centre to individually comply
with the parking standards is often not necessary, as car bays can be shared by
different uses throughout each day.
· The
WAPC’s State Planning Policy 4.2: Activity Centres recommends minimising
the amount of off-street parking, particularly for centres that are readily
accessible by walking, cycling or public transport. The shopping centre is well
connected by public transport, cycle paths and footpaths, and therefore it is
considered reasonable to minimise the amount of off-street (i.e. on-site),
parking.
· The
City’s draft Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre recommends a
lesser provision of vehicle parking bays for non-residential development at the
rate of 1 bay per 50m2. If this rate were to be applied to the
subject shopping centre, then 35,484m2 NLA would require 710 car
bays.
Improvements to roads
Intersection of Marmion Avenue and Ocean Keys Boulevard
Currently at the intersection of Ocean Keys Boulevard and
Marmion Avenue there is no provision for a left-turn slip lane on Ocean Keys
Boulevard. Considering the increase in the volume of traffic on Ocean Keys
Boulevard at Marmion Avenue from 12,490 to 16,880 vpd, as requested by
Administration, the applicant has agreed to improve this intersection by
providing a left-turn slip lane on Ocean Keys Boulevard as shown on Attachment
9. It is recommended that a condition to that effect be included in the development
approval.
Improvements to the laneway
At the request of Administration, the applicant has agreed
to improve the 70 degree bend on the laneway as shown on Attachments 5 and
to widen the laneway and to improve the intersection of the laneway and Key
Largo Drive as shown on Attachment 6. It is recommended that a condition
to that effect be included in the development approval.
Key Largo Drive
The future Thursday daily traffic on Key Largo Drive between
the laneway and Ocean Keys Boulevard is estimated to be approximately 6,200
vehicles per day (vpd). The WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods policy
recommends a road reserve width of 24.4 metre for a Neighbourhood Connector
carrying a traffic volume up to 7,000 vpd making provision for single-carriageway
and parking embayments, and cycle paths on both sides. The current width of Key
Largo Drive road reserve is 23 metres and makes provision for cycle paths and
parking embayments on both side of the road. Key Largo Drive is therefore
considered to be adequate to carry the estimated volume of traffic.
The driveway to the multi-level car park from Key Largo
Drive is estimated to carry a traffic volume of about 6,000 vpd. The traffic
report does not recommend a right-turn slip lane into the driveway for the following
reasons:
· Caribbean
Circuit is a residential street that connects Ocean Keys Boulevard and Key
Largo Drive.
While it will be possible for
vehicles from the east to use Caribbean Circuit to access the centre, it
is not considered that this will occur to any great extent due to the proposed
new driveway to the multi-level car park off Ocean Keys Boulevard; and
· Currently
the driveway into the multi-level car park from Key Largo Drive carries a
traffic volume of 10,180 vpd. By proposing a new access into the car park from
Ocean Keys Boulevard, traffic flows into the driveway from Key Largo Drive will
significantly drop.
The City’s Traffic section has assessed the traffic
report and concurs with the findings of the report.
Multi-level car park
The multi-level car park is proposed to be designed with
landscaping and graphic treatments that will serve to screen the car parking
decks from the eastern boundary. However, the applicant has not provided the
details and therefore it is recommended that the planning approval include a
condition requiring the final materials and finishes of the car parking
structure to be detailed to the City’s satisfaction prior to the issue of
a building licence.
Residential Component
R Code Provisions
The proposed ten (10) multiple dwellings satisfy the
provisions of Part 7 of the Residential Design Codes relating to the design elements
for multiple dwellings. Each unit is provided with a balcony, a store room, bin
area and clothes drying area. The store rooms are provided opposite each unit
across the residential lobby. The bin areas are provided on the ground floor
along with the car park area. Screens have been proposed to screen off the
drying areas. While only 14 bays including 3 visitor bays are required, the
proposal makes provision for 16 bays.
Designing Out Crime Planning Guidelines
Some of the objectives of the WAPC’s Designing Out
Crime Planning Guidelines are:
· To
raise awareness of key community safety, security and crime prevention issues;
and
· To
ensure that planning and detailed design for redevelopment takes into
consideration designing out crime principles.
In this regard the following matters are noted:
The proposal does not provide a direct access between the
ground floor residential lobby and the car parking area. Attachment 10
contains an enlarged version of the ground floor plan at the corner of Ocean
Keys Boulevard and Key Largo Drive depicting the residential lobby, residential
car bays, the forecourt and the doors to the residential car park and lobby. As
both doors open into the forecourt, the residents
from the car park would be required to step outside onto the forecourt and then
enter the residential lobby. Such an arrangement is not desirable as the
residents would not only be exposed to the elements of the day but also it
would be potentially unsafe especially at night times. Residents should not be
expected to go outside in order to enter their apartment after parking their
car in the designated residents parking area.
One of the factors to be
considered in designing out crime is that buildings need to be designed so as
to not introduce ‘dead zones’ and entrapment spaces.
In the subject proposal, the
forecourt is likely to be an entrapment space as it is confined by buildings on
three sides and open to Key Largo Drive. Consequently, the area may be subject
to vandalism and anti-social behaviour.
It is therefore recommended that
the applicant be requested to modify the design to comply with the provisions
of the WAPC’s Designing Out Crime Planning Guidelines.
Further to the above, it is
expected that (typical with most commercial and mixed use developments) the
proposed shopping centre redevelopment will entail an expansion of the
centre’s own CCTV surveillance network, which will further contribute to
the perception of safety and serve as a deterrent to anti-social behaviour in
and around the development.
Legal Agreement
ASP 2 requires that prior to the commencement of development
for the retail expansion of the shopping centre, a legal agreement supported by
a caveat on title, is to be entered into by the applicant with the City of
Wanneroo and the WAPC to ensure that a minimum of ten residential apartments
are constructed within stage 1. It is recommended this provision be included as
condition in the development approval.
Conclusion
Greg Rowe and Associates, on behalf of AMP Royal Randwick
Pty Ltd, requested approval to commence development of the proposed extensions
and alterations to the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre in Clarkson. Currently, the
shopping centre has a retail floor space of 21,690m2 net lettable
area (NLA). The applicant proposed to increase the retail floor space of the
shopping centre by 13,794m2 NLA. When developed, the total retail
floor space of the shopping centre will be 35,484m2 NLA.
The shopping centre is located within the Clarkson District
Centre Structure Plan area and is subject to the provisions of ASP 2. One of
the former provisions of ASP 2 was to limit the maximum retail floor space
within the Clarkson District Centre to 28,800m2 NLA. As the retail
floor space of the shopping centre, when extended, would exceed the maximum
retail floor space limit, the applicant requested an amendment to ASP 2, which
among other matters sought to remove the limitation on the retail floor space. A
requirement of the WAPC’s consideration of the amendment, however,
limited the first stage of the centre’s expansion to 13,642m2 retail
NLA that will result in a total retail floor space of 34,934m2 NLA.
Including the proposed 550m2 commercial floor space the total floor
space of the centre will be 35,484m2 NLA.
Following Council’s and the WAPC’s resolution to
adopt the amendment, the applicant submitted the modified plans addressing the
requirements of the amended ASP 2. It is recommended that the modified plans be
approved subject to conditions.
Statutory
Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with DPS 2.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“3 Economic
3.1 Create
strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands”
3.2 Support
business and initiatives.
Policy
Implications
Policy Clause 1.2 of the City’s Local Planning Policy
4.2: Structure Planning states that an Agreed Structure Plan is required as a
prerequisite for land zoned Centre in DPS 2 unless Council having regard to the
matters listed under clause 9.11.2 of DPS 2 determines that the proposal or
application is for one or more of the following:
a) The
amalgamation of lots or part lots;
b) The
consolidation of land for ‘super lot’ purposes to facilitate land
assembly for future development; or
c) The
purpose of allowing access or the provision of services or infrastructure that
would not prejudice future development outcomes.
As per subclause 9.8.1 of DPS 2, an Agreed Structure Plan
comes into operation on the later date when it is either certified by the WAPC
or adopted, signed and sealed by Council. Although adopted by the WAPC and
Council subject to modification, Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 has not yet been
certified by both the WAPC and Council.
Clause 4.2 of DPS 2 states that if a development is subject
of an application for Planning Approval and does not comply with the
development standard or requirement prescribed in the scheme, Council may
approve the application conditionally if Council is satisfied that the proposed
development would be appropriate and not have any adverse effect upon the
inhabitants of the locality or upon the likely future development of the locality.
In this regard it is noted that as the amendment has been adopted by the WAPC
and Council and is now merely going through an administrative procedure for its
final certification, it is recommended that the subject development application
be approved.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the
development application submitted by Greg Rowe & Associates on behalf of
AMP Royal Randwick Pty Ltd in accordance with the provisions of District
Planning Scheme No. 2 for the proposed extension of the Ocean Keys Shopping
Centre at Lot 406 (36) Ocean Keys Boulevard, Clarkson as shown in
Attachment 4 to this report, subject to the following conditions being met to
the satisfaction of the Manager, Planning Implementation:
Additional Retail Floor
space
1. Stage
1 of any additional development shall not exceed more than 13,642m2
retail Net Lettable Area as per the provisions of Amendment No. 6 to the
Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 adopted by the Western
Australian Planning Commission and the City of Wanneroo;
Modifications to the Plan:
2. Modifications
to the plans to ensure that the design of the multiple dwellings and associated
car park and the adjoining forecourt fronting Key Largo Drive comply with the
provisions of the Western Australian Planning Commission’s Designing Out
Crime Planning Guidelines;
3. Buildings
fronting Ocean Keys Boulevard shall be oriented towards Ocean Keys Boulevard
and shall incorporate active frontages with no blank facades and with awnings
with a minimum width of 2.0 metres projecting over the road reserve at a
minimum clearance of 2.75 metres above the finished pavement level. Awnings
shall not encroach within 600 millimetres of the kerbline;
Improvements to the roads:
4. Improvements
to the 70 degree bend on the laneway located at the south-western corner of the
shopping centre as shown on Attachment 5 to this report shall be completed at
the cost of the applicant prior to the occupation of the extended Centre;
5. Improvements
to the intersection of Key Largo Drive and the laneway as shown on Attachment 6
to this report shall be completed at the cost of the applicant prior to the
occupation of the extended Centre;
6. Widening
of the laneway as shown on Attachment 6 to this report shall be completed at
the cost of the applicant prior to the occupation of the extended Centre;
7. Improvements
to the intersection of Marmion Avenue and Ocean Keys Boulevard as shown on
Attachment 9 to this report shall be completed at the cost of the applicant
prior to the occupation of the extended Centre;
Car parks:
8. The
proposed multi-level car park shall be designed and constructed as per the
provisions of Australian Standard 2890 and shall make provision for a minimum
of 1,358 car bays including 16 car bays for the
proposed Multiple Dwelling units. The visitors car parking bays shall be marked
and set aside for the visitors;
9. The
final materials and finishes of the multi-level car park to be detailed prior
to the issue of a building licence;
10. The proposed
crossovers are to be constructed in concrete to commercial specifications;
11. Existing
crossover at the intersection of Key Largo Drive and Caribbean Circuit not
required for this approval shall be closed; kerbs, footpaths, cycle paths and
on-street car parking bays reinstated; medians closed and verges graded
stabilised and landscaped, where appropriate;
12. All the
proposed pedestrian linkages within the proposed development area are to be
linked to the existing pedestrian network within the surrounding road network
as shown on Attachment 8 to this report;
13. Motorcycle/scooter/bicycle
parking facilities must be provided to meet Australian Standard 2890. Details
of the location of bicycle parking facilities and associated end of journey
facilities for employees are to be provided for approval when application is
made for a building licence;
14. Lighting shall
be installed along all driveways and pedestrian pathways and in all common
service areas prior to the development first being occupied;
15. Parking areas,
driveways, and points of ingress and egress shall be designed and constructed
in accordance with the Australian Standard for Off-street Car Parking (AS 2890)
and shall be drained, sealed and marked;
16. Disabled
parking bays shall be provided at the rate required under the Australian
Standard for Off Street Parking (AS 2890) and shall be distributed across the
site in locations convenient to the shopping centre entrances;
17. Carparking
bays are to be 5.5 metres long and a minimum of 2.5 metres wide. End bays are
to be 2.8 metres wide and end bays in a blind aisle are to be 3.5 metres wide;
18. No parking
bays shall be obstructed in any way or used for the purposes of storage;
19. A dedicated
taxi stand shall be provided within or immediately abutting the shopping
centre, in the vicinity of the shopping centre entrance(s) prior to the
development first being occupied;
20. Service
vehicle manoeuvring to and within the site shall be provided in compliance with
the Australian Standard for Off-street parking Part 2 – Commercial
vehicle facilities (AS 2890.2). A plan indicating service vehicle sweep
paths shall be provided prior to the submission of a building licence
application;
21. Provision of
at least one shopping trolley collection area for each two rows of car bays in
a mid block location. The shopping trolley collection areas shall be designed
sufficient to contain the trolleys, protect them from damage by vehicles and be
sign posted for easy identification by shoppers;
Other:
22. The
preparation and implementation of a suitable Stormwater Drainage and Waste
Water Disposal Strategy for the development. The Strategy shall be
submitted for the City’s approval when application is made for a building
licence and the system shall be installed during the construction of the
development;
23. A landscape
plan for the proposed development shall be lodged when application is made for
a building licence;
24. The colours,
design and materials of the proposed development shall complement existing
development as far as possible;
25. A refuse
removal management plan shall be prepared in consultation with the City’s
Waste Services to illustrate how service vehicles will manoeuvre on the
internal access ways of the development;
26. An overall
signage strategy for the development shall be submitted before any licences are
issued;
27. For all new or
modified development, an acoustic consultant’s report is to be provided
for the City’s approval, prior to the commencement of the
development. This report is to indicate the anticipated sound level
measurements for all types of noise associated with the development indicating
plant and equipment noise as well as noise associated with operational
activities. The report must also indicate any specific requirements that
are needed to ensure noise emissions comply with the Environmental Protection
(Noise) Regulation 1997.
Upon approval of that report by the City, any
modifications required to the development as a result of its recommendations,
shall be made to the City’s satisfaction. Upon completion of the
development, a further report is required confirming that actual noise levels
comply with the Regulations;
28. Bin Storage
Areas to be provided with a concrete floor graded to a 100mm industrial floor
waste gully connected to sewer. A hose cock is required to be provided within
the Bin Storage Area;
29. All services
such as air conditioning plant and compressors shall be located away from
public areas. All services and service yards shall be screene3d from view
of streets and other public areas, including car parking areas to the
City’s satisfaction. Roof mounted equipment such as air
conditioning plant and antennae shall also be screened from view of the street
and other public areas, including car parking areas, to the City’s
satisfaction. Relative to this condition plans and specifications of all
screening required and proposed shall be submitted to the City for approval
and, upon approval, such screening installed prior to occupancy of the
development; and
Legal Agreement:
30. Prior to the
commencement of development for the retail expansion of the shopping centre, a
legal agreement, supported by a caveat on title is to be entered into by the
proponent with the City of Wanneroo and the Western Australian Planning
Commission to ensure that the proposed ten (10) residential apartments are
constructed as part of the proposed extension to the shopping centre. All costs
associated with the preparation and execution of this agreement and associated
caveat shall be borne by the proponent.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - OKSC
|
11/129982
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - OKSC
|
11/129984
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - OKSC
|
11/130003
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - OKSC
|
11/129986
|
Minuted
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 5 - Fig 1
|
11/129328
|
Minuted
|
|
6.
|
Attachment 6 - Fig 3
|
11/129327
|
Minuted
|
|
7.
|
Attachment 7 - OKSC
|
11/131389
|
|
|
8.
|
Attachment 8 - 111118_BIKE + PEDESTRIAN PATHS_DA12
|
11/130054
|
Minuted
|
|
9.
|
Attachment 9 - OKSC
|
11/130005
|
Minuted
|
|
10.
|
Attachment 10 - OKSC
|
11/130150
|
|
PS05-12/11 Development
Application - Tourism/Advertising Signs Located Within Marmion Avenue Road
Reserve
File Ref: DEV11/1152
– 11/124325
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider authorising administration to approve a
development application for retrospective approval of five tourism signs within
the Marmion Avenue regional road reserve, in the suburbs of Alkimos and
Eglinton.
|
Applicant
|
Eugene Ferraro on behalf of the Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism
Network
|
|
Owner
|
Crown Land - City of Wanneroo Management
|
|
Location
|
Marmion Avenue Regional Road Reserve, Alkimos &
Eglinton
|
|
Site Area
|
N/A
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Other Regional Road
|
Background
At its meeting of 25 August 2009 (Item IN10-08/09), Council
approved the installation of five signs within the Marmion Avenue Road Reserve
for the purpose of promoting tourism in the Yanchep Two Rocks area. The signs
approved by Council were installed but later replaced by five larger signs, in
contravention of the approval and without seeking consent from the City.
The unauthorised signs came to the City’s attention
and on 19 July 2011 a direction notice was issued for the removal of the
non-compliant signage. The proponent (Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism Network)
submitted an application for review (appeal) against that Direction to the
State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) and sought the matter to be deferred. A SAT
Directions hearing was held on 2 September 2011 to determine if the
applicant’s requested deferral would be granted. At that hearing, SAT
‘stayed’ (deferred) the City’s direction notice until a
further order by SAT.
Concurrently with the SAT proceedings, a development
application was lodged with the City for retrospective approval of the five
tourism signs within the Marmion Avenue regional road reserve, in the suburbs
of Alkimos and Eglinton. At its meeting of 20 September 2011 (PS06-09/11)
Council, in its capacity as owner/manager of the road reserve, resolved (among
other things) to authorise the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to sign the
development application for retrospective planning approval of the five
existing tourism signs, including the proposed use of the ‘back’ of
the signs for display of advertisements; thus allowing the application to be
formally processed.
The sign structures are proposed entirely within the Marmion
Avenue road reserve and are therefore subject to assessment under Metropolitan
Region Scheme (MRS). Under Planning and Development Act 2005 Instrument
of Delegation 2010/10 the power to determine applications within areas zoned
‘Other Regional Roads’ (ORR) under the MRS is delegated to local
governments, subject to referral to the Department of Planning (DoP) for
comment and recommendation. The application was referred to DoP 24 November
2011. Subject to no objection being received within 30 days, the City may
determine the application. As yet no response has been received by the City.
Detail
The applicant has applied for
retrospective development approval to construct five signs for the purpose of
tourism/advertising within the Marmion Avenue Road Reserve in the suburbs of
Alkimos and Eglinton (refer Attachment 1). The sign structures are each
7.4m high and consist of a 6.4m sign mounted on two 0.8m high support poles.
The proposed signs are each 2.7m wide (refer Attachment 2).
The signs incorporate the
promotion of regional tourism on their ‘front’ (facing north-bound
traffic), while the Tourism Network proposes to use the ‘back’ of
the signs (facing south-bound traffic) to sell advertising space for
‘sponsorship’. This ‘sponsorship’ is proposed to fund
the signs and raise revenue for the Tourism Network, which is a ‘not for
profit’ organisation. The front of the signage originally approved by
Council incorporated both the sponsor’s name (Capricorn Village) and the
City of Wanneroo’s name and logo, as do the current signs.
The application is retrospective
as the signs have already been constructed with the advertising already applied
to the backs of three of these signs. Attachment 3 contains photographs
of the front of all five signs as erected while Attachment 4 contains
photographs of the back (advertising) of the three signs that currently display
advertising. A City vehicle is visible in all photographs to provide a sense of
scale.
Following a recent site
inspection, it is noted that the top portion of the front of the signs now also
incorporates commercial advertising of land for sale, which was not previously
approved, was not applied for recently and appears to have been installed since
and despite the City’s direction issued in respect of the unapproved
signs.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The City has management responsibility for the subject road
reserve and is therefore effectively the ‘owner’ of the land for
the purpose of enabling development applications to be made. In this regard, it
is important to note that the Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO’s)
authorisation of the development application merely enabled that application to
be made and assessed, and will in no way prejudice Council’s decision on
this matter.
An assessment of the application was undertaken by
Administration in which the following matters were considered:
· The
City’s Signs Local Planning Policy: Size and Location of the Signs;
· Road
Safety/ Compliance with Main Roads Western Australia Guidelines;
· Advertising
on the back of the signs; and
· Delegation
to approve the applications within MRS reserve.
Each of these matters is discussed below.
Signs Local Planning Policy: Size of Signs
The City’s Signs Local Planning Policy (Signs Policy)
is silent on signage for tourism promotion. Due to the lack of direct guidance
for tourism signage, and as the signs are proposed to incorporate some advertising
material related to nearby residential estates, Administration also assessed
the signs using the ‘Estate Sign’ guidelines of the Signs Policy,
which states that estate signs shall:
· be
located entirely within the estate to which they relate and may be located on
public land within that estate;
· not
exceed six metres by three metres, mounted on one or more support poles;
· be
located at justified strategic points within the estate to avoid unnecessary
proliferation of estate signs;
· where
visible from the perimeter of the subdivision or development estate be limited
to a maximum of two signs; and
· be
removed within 30 days of 95% of the lots or buildings within the estate being
sold.
Points one, four and five above have not been directly applied
in the assessment as these are considered to directly relate to the sale of
property rather than the promotion of tourism. Points two and three, in
relation to size and location of signs, was considered in the assessment as
they directly relate to the impact of any signs on Marmion Avenue.
The height of the proposed signs, as shown in Attachment
2, represents a variation to the Signs Policy as the signs, excluding
support poles, are marginally greater than 6m. The height variation of 0.4m is
considered minor due to the design of the sign being curved at the top rather
than square. Further, the surface area of the sign is 17.11m2 which
is less than the possible 18m2 for a compliant sign of 6m high and
3m wide.
Signs Local Planning Policy: Location of Signs
The location of the signage approved by Council on 25 August
2009 was different to that of the signs that were erected. The applicant has
justified the relocation of the signs, stating that the new locations achieve
increased vehicle safety than the approved locations, due to their separation
distances from the road edge and increased legibility to passing traffic.
Administration has considered the tourism signage having
regard to the existing estate signs located along Marmion Avenue. The
separation distance and number of signs are not, at this stage, considered to
result in a proliferation of signage that would be detrimental to the amenity
of Marmion Avenue or the locality.
The signs are located within the Marmion Avenue road
reserve, which will be widened to accommodate a second carriageway in the
future. As per Council’s 2009 resolution, it is recommended that a
condition be applied to any approval granted for the signs, requiring them to
be relocated at the expense of the Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism Network when the
second carriageway of Marmion Avenue is constructed. At that time, a
separate development application will need to be submitted for the City’s
consideration and approval to reinstall the signs elsewhere within the road reserve.
Road Safety Compliance with Main Roads Western Australia
Guidelines
The Council resolution of 25 August 2009 stated, among other
things, that the individual location of the signs was to be in accordance with
Main Roads Western Australia’s (MRWA’s) Clear Zone Guidelines and
Aust Roads Guidelines. The current application has been assessed by
Administration against both the Main Roads Guidelines as well as Aust Roads
Guidelines. MRWA’s Assessment of Roadside Hazards identifies that
based on speed and daily traffic of the relevant sections of Marmion Avenue, an
8.4m ‘clear zone’ is required from the nearest edge of the
‘travelled path’ to each of the sign structures, in order to
achieve a safe separation distance between the road and the sign structures.
Aust Roads Guide to Road Design identifies that a 9m ‘clear
zone’ is required from the travelled path.
The existing signs are located between 10.4 metres and 12.2
metres from the travelled path of Marmion Avenue and meet both MRWA and the
Aust Roads requirements. Notwithstanding this, the application was referred to
MRWA for assessment and comment. MRWA responded confirming that the signs
are located outside the clear zone and therefore its ‘Guide to the
Management of Roadside Advertising’ is not applicable.
Advertising on the Back of the Signs
The application includes a proposal to use the
‘back’ of the signs as advertising space. This signage has already
been applied to three of the signs, as depicted in Attachment 4. The
applicant indicates that, while the primary purpose of the signage is to
promote visitation to the attractions of Yanchep and Two Rocks, given the cost
of the signage, sponsorship is required to maintain the signs as well as
provide a stream of income for the Tourism Network, which is a not for profit
organisation. The expected return for this sponsorship is approximately $7,000
per annum per sign in the first year.
In the 20 September 2011 report, Administration commented
that the proposed arrangement with the back of the signs would effectively
constitute billboards with the advertising being controlled by the Tourism
Network. At the time it was commented that the City should always retain
control over advertising on its land, but that the matter could be dealt with
as part of a conditional approval of a development application.
The Tourism Network has advised that any proposed
advertising would be subject to its separate assessment and approval prior to
installation and would be assessed against certain criteria restricting the
size and nature of advertising. In order to manage the display of advertising
on the back of the signs, it is recommended that the following condition be
applied to any approval granted:
“The content of the back of the signs shall, in the City’s
opinion:
(a) be
tourism related;
(b) not have more than 25% of its surface area
taken up by the sponsors’ names, brand, logo, product or the like;
(c) not
contain advertising that is of a general nature;
(d) not contain any information or graphics
that are politically sensitive, religious or pornographic in nature or
considered offensive to the public;
(e) not
depict smoking or tobacco products or substances prohibited by law;
(f) not
contravene any local law or other written law;
(g) not
be illuminated or have moving parts; or
(h) not
cause a hazard or undue distraction to traffic.”
As noted above, the top portion
of the front of the signs now also incorporates advertising of land for
sale. This advertising was not previously approved and is not tourism
related. Apart from the logo of the developer and the City of Wanneroo,
the front of the signs (as originally approved) were and still are to be
tourism based. The existing general lot sales advertising on the front of
the signs is inappropriate and should be removed. Any approval of the
signs should incorporate provisions to preclude such general advertising.
Delegation to approve the
application within MRS reserve
Under the Instrument of Delegation 2010/01, the application
can only be approved by local government after referral to the DoP for comment
and recommendation. The application has been referred however no comment or
recommendation has been received, therefore the application cannot be
determined by the City. By authorising the Manager of Planning Implementation to
conditionally approve the application, subject to no objection from the DoP the
matter can be dealt with in a timely manner. Should the DoP provide a response
that is not acceptable to the local government then the application must be
immediately referred to the WAPC for determination. This means that if Council
authorise the Manager Planning Implementation to approve the application and
DoP do not support the proposal then the delegation for local government to
approve the application is withdrawn.
After the Council Briefing session on 6 December 2011, the
City’s Administration received correspondence from the DoP advising that
it has no objection to this application. As such, it is no longer
necessary to authorise the Manager Planning Implementation to approve the
application, subject to no objection first being received from the DoP.
Instead, Council can now determine the application itself. The remainder
of this report and recommendation has been amended accordingly.
Conclusion
If Council is satisfied that the signs have (and will
continue to have) no adverse impact on Marmion Avenue and that design controls
for the advertising on the back of the signs can be managed through planning
conditions, then Council should approve the application. If, however, Council
is concerned that the proposal will have an adverse impact on Marmion Avenue,
by virtue of the height, location or appearance of the signs, and/or that the
advertising component cannot be managed through planning conditions, then the
application should be refused.
Apart from the lot sales
advertising appearing on the existing signs (which is soon to be removed),
Administration considers the impact of the signage on Marmion Avenue to be
acceptable as it accords with the City’s ‘Estate Signage’
requirements, Main Roads’ requirements and Aust Roads requirements
relating to traffic separation and safety. It is therefore recommended
that Council approve the application subject to conditions.
Statutory
Compliance
The sign structures are proposed entirely within the Marmion
Avenue road reserve and are therefore subject to assessment under the MRS
rather than the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.3 Improve
the capacity of local communities to support each other”
Policy
Implications
This application has been
assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning
Scheme No. 2 and the Signs Local Planning Policy.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the application by Eugene Ferraro
on behalf of the Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism Network for Five (5) Tourism
Signs within the Marmion Avenue Road Reserve in the suburbs of Alkimos and
Eglinton, as shown in Attachments 1, 2 and 3 subject to the following
conditions:
1. This approval is personal to
the Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism Network and only relates to the existing five
tourism signs. It does not relate to any other development within the road
reserve, nor is it transferrable or assignable to any other person or entity;
2. The
content of the signs is restricted to (only) the promotion of tourism-related
activities, opportunities and events within the City of Wanneroo, with the
following exceptions:
a) The
‘front’ of the signs (facing north-bound traffic) shall include the
name and logo ‘strap’ of the City of Wanneroo and may include the
sign sponsor beneath the displayed tourism image, and the sponsor’s web
address ‘strap’ above that image, as depicted in the photographs
included as Attachment 3 in the Agenda Report to Council on this matter to the
13 December 2011 Council meeting;
b) The
‘rear’ of the signs (facing south-bound traffic) may include the
sign sponsor’s name, brand or logo, to a maximum of 25% of the surface
area of the sign;
3. The general advertising
currently on the front of the signs shall be removed and no advertising other
than in accordance with condition 2 shall be permitted;
4. The content of the signs shall,
in the City’s opinion:
(a) subject to condition 2, only be tourism
related;
(b) not contain advertising that is of a general
nature;
(c) not contain any information or graphics
that are politically sensitive, religious or pornographic in nature or
considered offensive to the public;
(d) not depict smoking or tobacco products or
substances prohibited by law;
(e) not contravene any local law or other
written law;
(f) not be illuminated or have moving
parts;
(g) not cause a hazard or undue distraction to
traffic.
5. Public liability insurance of
$10 million indemnifying the City from any claims or damage associated with the
signs is to be provided at the expense of the applicant and thereafter
maintained for the life of the sign(s) to the satisfaction of the City.
Relative to this requirement, evidence of the currency of this insurance shall
be provided to the City’s satisfaction;
6. Within 60 days of being given
written notice by the City to do so, the signs shall be removed at the expense
of the Yanchep Two Rocks Tourism Network when the second carriageway of Marmion
Avenue is required to be constructed. Any proposal to relocate the signs
elsewhere will be subject to a separate application for development approval;
and
7. The
signs shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the City.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location of Signs
|
11/115191
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Size of Signs
|
11/101940
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Photos of front of signs
|
11/126883
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Photos of backs of signs
|
11/126894
|
|
PS06-12/11 Development
Application - Temporary Sales Office (and associated car park, access and
earthworks) at Lot 9504, 1700 Marmion Avenue, Tamala Park
File Ref: DEV11/1293
– 11/126800
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider allowing a departure from Local Planning Policy
4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2) and authorising Administration to
support the following development at Lot 9504 (1700) Marmion Avenue, Tamala
Park:
· A
current development application for a car park, access and earthworks (DA
2011/890); and
· A
future development application for a temporary sales office.
|
Applicant
|
Cossill & Webley Pty Ltd
|
|
Owner
|
City of Wanneroo, City of Joondalup, City of Vincent, City
of Stirling, Town of Cambridge, City of Perth, Town of Victoria Park
(together developing the land as Tamala Park Regional Council)
|
|
Location
|
Lot 9504 (1700) Marmion Avenue, Tamala Park
|
|
Site Area
|
342.97 Hectares
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
Background
At its
4 May 2010 meeting (Item PS02-05/10), Council resolved that the Tamala Park
Local Structure Plan No. 79 (LSP 79), encompassing all of Lot 9504, was
satisfactory subject to certain modifications being made by the applicant. In
April 2011 the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) wrote to the City
informing that it had resolved to endorse LSP 79, subject to modifications,
which were agreed by Council at its 31 May 2011 Meeting (PS08-05/11).
On 26
August 2011 the City received a development application (DA2011/890) from
Cossill and Webley Consulting Engineers (the applicant) for earthworks, car
parking and a slip road for a temporary sales office, within a portion of the
subject Structure Plan area.
Detail
The
applicant is seeking approval for a car park, access and earthworks on a
portion of Lot 9405 in advance of an Agreed Structure Plan. The proposed works
are located within an area denoted as ‘Proposed DA Boundary’ as
depicted on the plan provided as Attachment 1. A site plan of the
proposed works is included as Attachment 2.
To
date, Administration is yet to receive an application for a sales office that
correlates with the proposed car park, access and earthworks; however the
applicant has advised that a development application would be lodged ‘in
the near future’.
In
addition to Council’s consideration to grant Delegation to Administration
to determine the abovementioned development application, Administration is
seeking further delegation from Council to issue a response for any temporary
sales office development application within the area denoted as ‘Proposed
DA Boundary’ as depicted on the plan provided as
Attachment 1.
Comment
LSP 79
is not yet ‘agreed’ and operational under the City’s District
Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) as it has not yet been adopted by the WAPC or
signed and sealed by the City. Further, clause 1.2 of the City’s LPP 4.2
states that, pursuant to DPS 2, an ‘agreed’ structure plan is
required as a prerequisite to Council’s support for subdivision or
consideration of an application for planning approval unless the development or
subdivision pertain to the following:
a) The
amalgamation of lots or part lots;
b) The
consolidation of land for “superlot” purposes to facilitate land
assembly for future development; or
c) The
purpose of allowing access or the provision of services or infrastructure that
would not prejudice future development outcomes.
The
applicant is seeking approval to construct a car park, access and earthworks.
The applicant has advised Administration of their intent to lodge a separate
development application at a later date for a sales office. With regard to the
proposed car park, access and earthworks, the applicant is seeking planning
approval for development prior to an Agreed Structure Plan being in place. The
reasons put forward by the applicant in support of this development application
are as follows:
· The development application submitted for access, car
parking and earthworks would enable preliminary works to commence;
· LSP 79 has been approved by the Council and WAPC subject to
modification but these are largely notational and concerned with updating the
technical appendices in line with LSP 79, and do not materially affect
the overall land use arrangements;
· The area to which this request relates and the nature of the
request itself, is unaffected by Council’s adopted modifications to LSP
79.
Administration
is in agreement with the above points and has no objection to Council granting
dispensation from the aforementioned provision of LPP 4.2 in this instance, to
allow Administration to grant conditional development approval for earthworks,
access and car parking and to determine a future development application for a
temporary sales office within the area depicted on the plan included as Attachment
1 to this report.
Should
approval of the subject developments be granted by the City, the applicant
should accept the risk that any development undertaken at this preliminary
stage may need to be modified at a later date, in response to any impending
WAPC subdivision approval or engineering design drawings and finished road and
lot levels approved by the City.
Council
has already delegated authority to Administration to make decisions of this
nature under DPS 2 and the Planning and Development Act 2005 (Delegated Authority
Clause 9.3), however, as these proposals do not comply with LPP 4.2, a separate
one-off delegation of authority will be required in accordance with clause
8.6.1 of DPS 2 (by Absolute Majority) to enable these applications to be
processed. A recommendation to this effect is included in this report.
An
alternative is to recommend that Council approve the development application.
Administration has not recommended approval in this report, as the submitted
development application is subject to further internal assessment that is yet
to be completed by Administration and is pending the submission of a further
development application for a sales office. Delegation from Council to approve
the development application is also sought in this instance, as the applicant
is requesting prompt approval of the proposed works, and as Council is in
recess in January 2012, Administration could therefore prepare and issue
approval (with Council’s Delegation) immediately once a further
development application for a sales office has been lodged to the satisfaction
of Administration, and assessment of the development application for the car
park, access and earthworks has been completed.
Statutory
Compliance
Granting
of a one-off delegation of authority to staff to conditionally approve the
abovementioned development applications will require Council to exercise the
provisions of subclause 8.6.1 of DPS 2 to grant delegated authority to do so,
by Absolute Majority.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
As
discussed above, subclauses 1.1 and 1.2 within the “Policy Table”
of LPP 4.2 requires an Agreed Structure Plan to be in place as a prerequisite
to Council’s consideration of an application for planning approval.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council pursuant to Clause 8.6.1 of the City of
Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, DELEGATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the
Manager Planning Implementation, over and above those already contained within
Delegated Authority Clause 9.3, the power to:
1. Determine
a Development Application (DA2011/890) submitted by Cossill and Webley to
construct a car park and slip road and undertake the associated earthworks as
depicted on the plan included as Attachment 2 of this report subject to the
conditions deemed appropriate by that officer; and
2. Determine
any future Development Application to construct a temporary sales office within
the area depicted on the plan included as Attachment 1 in this report, subject
to conditions deemed appropriate by that officer.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Council Report - Extent of Works -
Tamala Park
|
11/128424
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Site Plan for Proposed Works
|
11/132758
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 13 December, 2011 161
PS07-12/11 Development
Application – Clearing and Bulk Earthworks at Lot 9002 (2611) Marmion
Avenue, Alkimos
File Ref: DEV11/1293
– 11/115204
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider allowing a departure from Local Planning Policy
4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2) and authorising Administration to
support the following development applications at Lot 9002 (2611) Marmion
Avenue, Alkimos:
· A
current development application for clearing and earthworks (DA2011/967); and
· A
future stage 1 subdivision application.
|
Applicant
|
Cossill & Webley
|
|
Owner
|
Landcorp
|
|
Location
|
Lot 9002 (2611) Marmion Avenue, Alkimos
|
|
Site Area
|
224.4 Hectares
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
Background
At its
31 May 2011 meeting (Item PS06-05/11), Council resolved that the South Alkimos
Local Structure Plan No. 72 (LSP 72), encompassing all of Lot 9002, was
satisfactory subject to certain modifications being made by the
proponent. LSP 72 was subsequently modified and referred to the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for final adoption in accordance with
Council’s decision.
On 4
October 2011 the City received a development application (DA2011/967) from
Cossill and Webley Consulting Engineers (the applicant) to undertake bulk
earthworks within a portion of the subject Structure Plan area.
Detail
The
applicant is seeking approval to undertake clearing and bulk earthworks on a
portion of Lot 9002 in advance of any subdivision approval from the WAPC, only
in the area denoted as ‘Extent of Stage 1 Earthworks’ as depicted
on the plan provided as Attachment 1.
To
date, Administration is yet to receive any subdivision referral from the WAPC
that correlates with the proposed earthworks; however the applicant has advised
that a subdivision application would be lodged ‘in the near
future’. In addition to Council’s consideration to grant Delegation
to Administration to determine the abovementioned development application,
Administration is seeking further delegation from Council to issue a response
for any subdivision referral from the WAPC within the area denoted as
‘Extent of Stage 1 Earthworks’ as depicted on the plan provided as Attachment
1.
Comment
LSP 72
is not yet finally ‘agreed’ and operational under the City’s
District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) as it has not yet been adopted by the
WAPC or signed and sealed by the City.
Further,
clause 1.2 of the City’s LPP 4.2 states that, pursuant to DPS 2, an
‘agreed’ structure plan is required as a prerequisite to
Council’s support for subdivision or consideration of an application for
planning approval, unless the development or subdivision pertain to the
following:
a) The
amalgamation of lots or part lots;
b) The
consolidation of land for “superlot” purposes to facilitate land
assembly for future development; or
c) The
purpose of allowing access or the provision of services or infrastructure that
would not prejudice future development outcomes.
The
proponent of the subject proposal has lodged a development application, seeking
planning approval for development prior to an Agreed Structure Plan being in
place. The reasons put forward by the proponent in support of this development
application are as follows:
· The Development Application will enable preliminary
earthworks to commence, without prejudicing any decision by the WAPC on any
future subdivision application;
· The area to which this request relates and the nature of
the request itself, is unaffected by Council’s adopted modifications to
the respective Structure Plan; and
· Approval of this request will enable access to the site and
facilitate the early extension of essential services and provide for early
construction of dwellings.
Administration
is in agreement with the above points and has no objection to Council granting
dispensation from the aforementioned provision of LPP 4.2 in this instance, to
allow Administration to grant conditional development approval for the proposed
bulk earthworks, subject to the following:
· The earthworks being consistent with a valid subdivision
referral from the WAPC;
· The proponent accepts the risk that any earthworks
undertaken at this preliminary stage may need to be revised at a later date, in
response to any impending WAPC subdivision approval or engineering design
drawings and finished road and lot levels approved by the City; and
· Any approval granted for the proposed earthworks will be
restricted to the movement of soil around the site for cut-to-fill purposes and
will not authorise any trenching or laying of services.
Administration
also has no objection to Council granting dispensation from the aforementioned
provision of LPP 4.2 in this instance, to allow Administration to support an
application for subdivision approval within the development application area,
in accordance with the LSP but ahead of it being ‘agreed’.
Council
has already delegated authority to Administration to make decisions of this
nature under DPS 2 except where (as in this case) the proposal does not accord
with an adopted policy (Delegated Authority Clause 9.3). As the proposed
development application and possibly the future subdivision application
(depending on when it is submitted), represent a departure from LPP 4.2, a
separate one-off delegation of authority is recommended to allow Administration
to process these applications.
An
alternative is to recommend that Council approve the development application.
Administration has not recommended approval in this report, as the development
application cannot be cross-referenced with a subdivision referral from the
WAPC, and is subject to further internal assessment that is yet to be completed
by Administration. Delegation from Council to approve the development
application is also sought in this instance, as the applicant is requesting
prompt approval of the proposed works, and as Council is in recess in January
2012, Administration could therefore prepare and issue approval (with
Council’s Delegation) immediately once a subdivision referral from the
WAPC and assessment of the development application has been completed.
Statutory
Compliance
In
accordance with clause 8.6.1 of DPS 2 Council may, by absolute majority, grant
a one-off delegation of authority to Administration to conditionally approve
the proposed bulk earthworks development application and to respond to the
subdivision application for that area when it is lodged (and ahead of LSP 72
being finally ‘agreed’).
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
This
proposal represents a departure from LPP 4.2, for which Council approval is
required.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council, pursuant to Clause 8.6.1 of the City of
Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, DELEGATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the
following powers to the Manager Planning Implementation, over and above those
already contained within Delegated Authority Clause 9.3:
1. Provide
a referral response to the Western Australian Planning Commission for a
subdivision within the “Stage 1 Earthworks Boundary” depicted on
the plan included as Attachment 1, subject to conditions deemed
appropriate by that officer; and
2. Determine
the Development Application (DA2011/967) submitted by Cossill and Webley to
undertake Clearing and Bulk Earthworks (cut-to-fill only) within the area
identified as “Stage 1 Earthworks Boundary” depicted on the plan
included as Attachment 1, providing such works accord with a subdivision
application referral for that area from the Western Australian Planning
Commission and subject to conditions deemed appropriate by that officer.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Amended Attachment 1 - Earthworks and clearing
|
11/137847
|
|
PS08-12/11 Development
Application – Bulk Earthworks and Other Development at Lot 2 Marmion
Avenue, Eglinton
File Ref: DEV11/1350
– 11/121421
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider an application for planning approval for the
following development on Lot 2, Marmion Avenue, Eglinton prior to an Agreed
Structure Plan being in place:
· Clearing
and earthworks; and
· An
existing temporary land sales office, installed without the appropriate
approval of Administration.
|
Applicant
|
Development Planning Strategies
|
|
Owner
|
Eglinton Estates Pty Ltd Atf Sns Trust
|
|
Location
|
Lot 2 (3100) Marmion Avenue, Eglinton
|
|
Site Area
|
198.18 Hectares
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
Background
At its
8 February 2011 meeting Council resolved that the Eglinton Local Structure Plan
No. 82 (LSP 82) was satisfactory subject to certain modifications (PS01-02/11)
and referred LSP 82 to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).
At that time, Council also resolved to delegate authority to Administration to:
a) Provide a
recommendation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for approval of
the subdivision to create the 43 lots shown on the plan attached to that
report; and
b) Grant approval
to the proponent‘s Development Application for Bulk Earthworks
(cut-to-fill only) within the Stage 1 subdivision application shown on the plan
attached to that report.
In
accordance with item a) above, Administration provided a recommendation to the
WAPC for approval of subdivision 143436, subject to conditions. In accordance
with item b) above, Administration approved the proponent’s development
application for bulk earthworks (cut-to-fill only) on 9 March 2011
(DA2010/1428).
Administration
later received a revised (second) development application (DA2011/634) from the
applicant to amend the Planning Approval issued on 9 March 2011 to:
· Realign the “Clearing and Earthworks Boundary”;
· Construct a sales office, associated car parking and access
road;
· Utilise the site compound during the construction of
various stages within the estate;
· Include a mulching area; and
· Include an infrastructure service corridor for the
provision of services from the Shorehaven estate to the south.
Council
considered this revised application at its 26 July 2011 Meeting (PS06-07/11),
where it resolved to delegate authority to Administration to approve the
revised application. Administration subsequently granted a further planning
approval on 10 August 2011.
Detail
On 13
October 2011 the City received another (third) development application
(DA2011/1012) from Development Planning Strategies (the applicant) on behalf of
the subdivider Stockland. A site plan depicting the extent of works proposed as
part of this development application is included as Attachment 1.
The extent of the proposed works is summarised as follows-
Earthworks
The
applicant is seeking further modification to the earthworks boundary,
previously approved by Administration. This proposal is to facilitate
preliminary works to achieve the early delivery (by the subdivider) of a
‘District Playing Fields’ site and adjacent Primary School site, in
the absence of a subdivision approval issued by the WAPC. A subdivision application
encompassing the ‘District Playing Fields’ and adjacent Primary
School site (WAPC reference 144914) has been received by Administration for its
comment.
Temporary
Sales Office
The
applicant is also seeking retrospective approval for a temporary sales office,
as well as associated car parking and access where shown on the site plan
included as Attachment 1. Administration understands that the sales
office has been situated at the current site since the last week in October
2011.
Below is a summary of the
applicant’s explanation as to why the sales office was installed in its
current location, without the required planning approval:
· The
temporary sales office is a transportable structure that was manufactured off
site and sits on the land, without the need for connection to external services
or utilities. Portable on-site power, water and effluent disposal systems are
provided for the sales office, which is currently used between the hours of 1pm
and 5pm Saturday to Wednesday (inclusive);
· The
manufacturer of the sales office stored the structure on its premises in
Wangara for as long as possible after its construction, but then required it to
be removed from its premises to make room for storage of other more recently
completed structures;
· The
land upon which the sales office has been placed was cleared and levelled in
accordance with subdivision engineering drawings approved by the City in June
2011. As such, separate planning approval for those earthworks is not required.
With the exception of the placement of the sales office on the site, no
additional works have been undertaken beyond the limits of the City’s
current planning approval and earthworks engineering drawings;
· Following
Council’s previous approval of the original sales office location
(further to the south of the current site), the subdivider encountered
difficulties in obtaining clearing approval for that land from the Federal
Government under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
(Commonwealth), as a result of differences of opinion between the State
(through the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC)) and the federal
environmental agency.
The
federal clearing approval was expected in July 2011 following resolution of the
DEC’s requirements, but the federal clearing approval is still
outstanding;
· It
was expected that the WAPC would grant its final approval of LSP 82 shortly
after Council adopted it (in February 2011), which would have then allowed
Administration to approve the sales office under delegated authority. However,
that did not occur and the LSP is still awaiting finalisation;
· The
current sales office location is not the subdivider’s preferred or
long-term location and has only been placed in that location as a result of
federal government delays in the progress of clearing approvals required to
facilitate the placement of the sales office in the preferred location, as
previously approved by Council;
· In
anticipation of federal government clearing approval being obtained and following
Council’s planning approval for the original sales office location, the
subdivider financially committed to an advertising campaign, comprising print
and screen media, which referenced the presence of an on-site sales office from
the last weekend in October 2011 (29th/30th).
Consequently, the subdivider considered there to be a commercial need to
provide a sales office to cater for the commencement of land sales at that
time;
· The
subdivider discussed the above issues, concerns and delays with Administration
prior to the placement of the sales office on-site and had no intention to
conceal the prospect of the sales office needing to be temporarily placed on
site but not in the position previously approved by Council.
Further to the above, the subdivider has acknowledged and
apologised for its error of judgement in placing the sales office on site,
constructing car parking and landscaping its surrounds, and using the structure
as a sales office, without approval.
A site
inspection by Administration has identified that the design of the sales office
currently situated on the subject land is consistent with the design approved
for the original site (refer to DA2011/634 as depicted in Attachment 2).
Comment
LSP 82
is not yet finally ‘agreed’ and operational under the City’s
District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) as it has not yet been adopted by the
WAPC or signed and sealed by the City. Further, clause 1.2 of the
City’s LPP 4.2 states that, pursuant to DPS 2, an ‘agreed’
structure plan is required as a prerequisite to Council’s support for
subdivision or consideration of an application for planning approval, unless
the development or subdivision pertain to the following:
a) The
amalgamation of lots or part lots;
b) The
consolidation of land for “superlot” purposes to facilitate land
assembly for future development; or
c) The
purpose of allowing access or the provision of services or infrastructure that
would not prejudice future development outcomes.
The
proponent of the subject proposal has lodged a development application, seeking
planning approval for development prior to an Agreed Structure Plan being in
place. The reasons put forward by the proponent in support of this development
application are as follows:
· The Development Application will enable preliminary
earthworks to commence, without prejudicing any decision by the WAPC on any
future subdivision application;
· The area to which this request relates and the nature of
the request itself, is unaffected by Council’s adopted modifications to
the respective Structure Plan; and
· Approval of this request will enable access to the site and
facilitate the early extension of essential services and provide for early
construction of dwellings.
Administration
is in agreement with the above points and has no objection to Council granting
dispensation from the aforementioned provision of LPP 4.2 in this instance, to
allow Administration to issue a determination for the existing sales office and
proposed bulk earthworks, subject to the following:
· Should Administration approve the subject works, the
proponent accepts the risk that any works undertaken at this preliminary stage
may need to be revised at a later date, in response to any impending WAPC
subdivision approval or engineering design drawings and finished road and lot
levels approved by the City; and
· Any approval granted for the proposed earthworks will be
restricted to the movement of soil around the site for cut-to-fill purposes and
will not authorise any trenching or laying of services.
Council
has already delegated authority to Administration to make decisions of this
nature under DPS 2 except where (as in this case) the proposal does not accord
with an adopted policy (Delegated Authority Clause 9.3). As the proposed
development application represents a departure from LPP 4.2, a separate one-off
delegation of authority is recommended to allow Administration to process these
applications.
An
alternative is to recommend that Council determine the development application.
Administration has not recommended any determination in this report, as the
development application is subject to further internal assessment that is yet
to be completed by Administration. Delegation from Council to determine the
development application is also sought in this instance, as the applicant is
requesting prompt approval of the existing and proposed works, and as Council
is in recess in January 2012, Administration could therefore prepare and issue
approval (with Council’s Delegation) immediately once assessment has been
completed.
Statutory
Compliance
Granting
of a one-off delegation of authority to staff to determine the abovementioned
development application will require Council to exercise the provisions of
subclause 8.6.1 of DPS 2 to grant delegated authority to do so, by Absolute
Majority.
The placement of the sales office in its current location,
together with the construction of car parking and landscaping of its surrounds,
represent “development” under the Planning and Development Act
2005 for which approval was required, but not obtained by the subdivider.
The carrying out of those works and use of the structure for the purpose of a
sales office without approval, constitutes an offence under the City’s
DPS 2 and the Act, for which action may be taken (under Part 13 of the Act)
against the subdivider in any one or more of the following ways:
· Issue
of a Direction to cease and/or remove the unapproved use and development;
· Instigate
prosecution proceedings;
· Seek
a Supreme Court injunction;
· Issue
an infringement notice(s).
Of the above enforcement options available to Council, it is
recommended that Council instruct Administration to issue a Direction to the
subdivider to immediately cease using the sales office for any purpose, until
or unless retrospective planning approval is granted by Administration and all
other approvals or certificates have been obtained for occupancy and use of
that structure, including any required building, occupancy and effluent
treatment/disposal certification.
Administration does not consider there to be any value in
commencing prosecution proceedings or seeking an injunction against the
subdivider in this instance or at this stage, given that:
· Administration
is supportive of the location and design of the sales office and has confirmed
that the sales office and its surrounds have been constructed in accordance
with Council’s previous planning approval for this use, albeit in a
different location;
· The
location of the sales office takes advantage of land that was otherwise cleared
and levelled in accordance with City engineering design approvals, as part of
an approved subdivision of the land, and did not necessitate any additional
earthworks beyond the scope of those approvals;
· Inspection
of the site by Administration (following the 6 December 2011 Council Briefing
session) indicates that no other works have been constructed on the property,
other than in accordance with current approvals;
· Part
of the subdivider’s haste to place the sales office on site is associated
with its expansion and acceleration of subdivision activities and the
commensurate (and early) delivery of District Playing Fields and a Primary
School site, well ahead of the Alkimos-Eglinton population reaching a point
that necessitates the provision of those essential community facilities;
· Administration
is not aware of any other such indiscretions by this subdivider (deliberate or
otherwise) either in Eglinton or elsewhere by that subdivider in the City of
Wanneroo;
· It
is acknowledged that the subdivider made every reasonable effort to place the
sales office in its approved location and, failing that (due to continued
delays in obtaining environmental approvals), attempted to delay the placement
and use of the sales office in its current location for as long as practical,
having regard to the commencement of its land sales program and associated
marketing.
Retrospective approval of the sales office and its ancillary
car parking and landscaping can be granted pursuant to clause 6.12 of DPS 2.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
As discussed above, subclauses 1.1 and 1.2 within the
“Policy Table” of LPP 4.2 requires an Agreed Structure Plan to be
in place as a prerequisite to Council’s consideration of an application
for planning approval.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That
Council:
1. Pursuant
to Clause 8.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2,
DELEGATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Manager Planning Implementation, over and
above those already contained within Delegated Authority Clause 9.3 the power
to determine the Development Application (DA2011/1012) submitted by Development
Planning Strategies to undertake Clearing and Bulk Earthworks (cut-to-fill
only), and for an existing (retrospective) sales office, access and parking
within the areas identified within “Approved DA Boundary
(DA2011/634)” and “Proposed New DA Boundary” as depicted on
the plan included as Attachment 1 in this report, providing that any approval
granted includes conditions limiting:
· The
term of approval to 12 months only, after which time the structure and all
associated and surrounding development is to be removed;
· Use
of the sales office for the purposes of land sales only; and
· The
hours of operation and use of the sales office to 1pm – 5pm Saturday
– Wednesday, inclusive.
2. INSTRUCTS
Administration to issue a Direction to the subdivider of Lot 2 Marmion Avenue,
Eglinton under S.214 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, requiring them
to cease using the sales office placed on that site without approval, until
such time as retrospective planning approval has been granted for that use and
all other approvals or certificates have been obtained for its use and
occupancy, including its associated effluent treatment/disposal system.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 (Revised) - Extent of Earthworks
Proposed - (DA2011/1012)
|
11/128462
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Site Plan & Floor Plan - Sales
Office
|
11/132723
|
|
Other Matters
PS09-12/11 Subdivisional
Retaining Walls Over 3.0 Metres in Height - Lots 134 and 135 Landsdale Road,
Landsdale (WAPC 142790)
File Ref: SD142790
– 11/125027
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider approval of subdivisional development retaining
walls over 3.0 metres and up to 4.19 metres in height on Lots 134 and 135
Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 142790).
Background
Council’s ‘Retaining Wall’ policy provides
that subdivisional retaining walls over 3.0 metres in height require
consideration and approval by Council.
The subject land is located within the East Wanneroo Cell 5
Structure Plan. On 2 December 2010, the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC) granted subdivision approval for 33 R20 residential lots
ranging in size between 454 m2 and 557 m2 and three R40
grouped dwelling sites ranging in size between 913 m2 and 1,725 m2
(WAPC Ref 142790).
The WAPC proposed a number of conditions on the approval,
including the following:
“9. The
land being filled and/or drained at the subdivider’s cost to the
satisfaction of the Western Australian Planning Commission and any easements
and/or reserves necessary for the implementation thereof, being granted free of
cost.”
Engineering drawings have been submitted on behalf of the
subdivider in fulfilment of the above condition, depicting retaining walls over
3.0m in height.
Detail
The subdivider’s consulting engineer, Westcoast
Engineering (WA) P/L, on behalf of the landowners/developers, Watson Property
Group Baldivis Village Ltd, has prepared design drawings including retaining
walls exceeding 3.0 metres in height for the subdivision of Lots 134 and 135
Landsdale Road, Landsdale. Refer to Attachment 1 for the location
plan.
The consulting engineer’s justification for the
proposed retaining walls exceeding 3.0m in height is summarised as follows:
The site is bounded by lots 502,501,506,715
and 716 to the north, Lots 846, 845,844,843,842,841,840 and 824 to the west,
Lots 613,614,621,622 and Falkner Street to the east and Landsdale Road to the
south. Existing height constraints imposed by current land topography and
fall of land from south/west to north/east have combined to elevate some of the
walls in Lots 236,235,234,227,225,206,205, 203 and 202 over the 3.0m height
restriction to ensure a level building platform for the prospective purchasers
and provide essential services to the site.
Consultation
The subdivider’s
consulting engineer initially proposed retaining walls on the common boundary
of existing residential lots. In accordance with Councils ‘Retaining
Wall’ policy, where a boundary retaining wall within 10 metres of a
dwelling on an adjoining property in a different ownership is proposed, its
height shall be determined in accordance with the Residential Design Codes for
a distance of 80 metres along the wall (centred on the adjoining dwelling). The
subdivider wrote to all affected adjoining landowners requesting their
agreement to the proposed retaining walls and three objections were received
from the owners of neighbouring Lots 841, 842 and 843.
The subdivider subsequently
amended the retaining wall proposal to locate the retaining walls 1.5 metres
from the boundary. In this regard, Part 6.3.3 of the residential Design Codes
– ‘Setback of Retaining Walls’ prescribes acceptable
development as being ‘Retaining walls setback back from common
boundaries in accordance with the setback provisions of table 1, tables 2a and
2b and figure 3’. The relevant section is table 2a, which
prescribes that walls less than 3.5 metres in height and more than 30 metres in
length shall be setback 1.5 metres from the boundary.
Comment
The design of retaining walls higher than 3.0m was
instigated by the developer to provide level blocks in an area where land falls
across the site. The majority of the retaining walls in the area do not
exceed 3.0m, with those greater than 3.0m in height ranging from 3.27 to 3.72m,
with only one retaining wall exceeding that range at 4.10m in height. All
of the walls exceeding 3.0m in height are located around the perimeter of the
subdivision to the north, west and east sides (refer Attachment 2).
Administration has considered the proposal and the need to
accommodate the established ground levels surrounding the subject land, which
cause a substantial fall of approximately 21m across Lots 134 and 135 from
84.62 AHD at its north-west corner to 63.34 at its south-west corner at
Landsdale Road. As the land to the north of the subdivision is higher
than the proposed finished lot levels and the land to the west is lower, any
changes to levels to reduce the height of the walls to the north would increase
the height of the walls to the west and vice versa. In view of these
facts, Administration is prepared to support the proposal.
Statutory
Compliance
A Building Licence will separately need to be granted for
the retaining walls prior to their construction.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise
impact of development on the environment”
1.4 Improve
the quality of the built environment
2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”.
Policy
Implications
Application for approval to construct retaining walls
exceeding 3.0 metres in height has been processed in accordance with
Council’s Retaining Walls Policy.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council AUTHORISES approval of the retaining walls
higher than 3.0 metres and up to 4.19 metres proposed for Lots 134 and 135
Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC No 142790), as depicted on the plan included as
Attachment 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Plan
|
11/135670
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Retaining Walls
|
11/128617
|
Minuted
|
PS10-12/11 Subdivisional
Retaining Walls Over 3.0 Metres in Height - Lot 130 Landsdale Road Stage 2,
Landsdale (WAPC 141832)
File Ref: SDS141832/S2
– 11/123061
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider approval of subdivisional development retaining
walls over 3.0 metres in height and up to 4.6 metres in height at Lot 130
Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 141832).
Background
Council’s ‘Retaining Wall’ policy provides
that subdivisional retaining walls over 3.0 metres in height require
consideration and approval by Council.
Detail
McDowall Affleck, on behalf of the developer, Mario Casella
& Sons Builders Pty Ltd, has designed retaining walls exceeding 3.0 metres
in height as part of their subdivision of Lot 130 Landsdale Road,
Landsdale. Refer to Attachment 1 for the location plan.
McDowall Affleck has designed and will superintend the
construction of this subdivision. Their justification for approval of the
retaining walls exceeding 3.0 metres in height can be summarised as follows:
· The
road design follows the natural surface as best as possible while conforming to
Urban Road Design Manuals. This design dictates the levels to be set for
the lots, which in turn dictate the heights of the retaining walls.
Design options are also constrained by the existing Marginson Road levels and
proposed road design for the approved subdivision on Lot 129 Landsdale Road to
the west.
· There
are six lots (three lots back to back) where retaining walls are over 3.0
metres, as shown on Attachment 2. None of these retaining walls
will be fronting the road, hence will not create any visual impact from the
road. Attachment 3 shows the cross sections throughout the site at
various locations.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The design of retaining walls higher than 3.0 metres was
instigated by the developer, Mario Casella & Sons Builders Pty Ltd, to
provide level blocks in an area where land fall across the site ranges from
56.5 to 68.0 natural ground level. The AHD peg 58.81 is located at the
intersection of Landsdale Road and Marginson Drive and the AHD peg 67.99 is
located at opposite the existing residence in Marginson Drive, both marked on Attachment
2. The West Australian Planning Conditions also require coordinating
of levels with any adjoining development. This results in sections of the
subdivision where retaining walls are higher than 3.0 metres (ranging from 4.20
metres to 4.60 metres).
Administration supports the proposed design for the
following reasons:
Maintaining 1 in 6 batters to the lot
The lots throughout the subdivision which are situated on
the low side of the road have been designed to be up to 0.5 metres lower than
the road level. This design maintains the City’s maximum allowable
batter of 1 in 6. This maximum allowable batter is also used where the
lots are on the high side of the road (up to 1 metre higher than the road
level). Changing the design levels would result in batters greater than
the maximum 1 in 6, which would be unacceptable.
Coordination of levels with adjoining lots
If the road profiles were altered to reduce retaining wall
heights, problems would be created for the future development of neighbouring
sites with the continuation of the roads, drainage and retaining walls.
One way road cross fall
The roads have been designed with one way ‘cross
fall’ to reduce the height difference and therefore the retaining wall
heights between the lots.
Statutory
Compliance
A Building Licence is necessary for all retaining walls
before construction can commence.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise
impact of development on the environment”
1.4 Improve
the quality of the built environment
2 Social
2.1
Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”.
Policy
Implications
Application for approval to construct retaining walls
exceeding 3.0 metres in height and up to 4.6 metres in height has been
processed in accordance with Council’s Retaining Walls Policy.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council AUTHORISES approval of the retaining
walls higher than 3.0 metres proposed for Lot 130 Landsdale Road, Landsdale
(WAPC 141832), as depicted on the plan included as Attachment 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Plan
|
11/132658
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Layout & Heights
|
11/132782
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Cross Section
|
11/132789
|
|
PS11-12/11 Proposed
Northern Extension of Wangara Industrial Area
File Ref: 6494
– 11/111433
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS)
Amendment 1216/57 – Wangara Industrial Precinct, to rezone approximately
81 ha of land in Wangara and Gnangara from ‘Rural’ to
‘Industrial’ in the MRS.
|
Owner
|
Aboriginal Lands Trust, Kinsley Craig Flugge &
Margaret Flugge, Francesco Colotti & Silvana Maria Colotti , Ross
Maitland Love, Marijan Grubelich, Donald Edward North and Starbrake Holdings
Pty Ltd
|
|
Location
|
Lots 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 50, 700 and 701 and portions of
Lots 6, 8 and 13 Sydney and Gnangara Roads, Wangara / Gnangara
|
|
Site Area
|
Approx 105 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Rural
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
General Rural
|
Background
The subject land is located immediately east and north-east
of the existing Wangara Industrial Area. The subject area is bisected by the
Ocean Reef Road extension. A plan showing the location of the subject site is
included as Attachment 1.
The subject land is zoned ‘Rural’ under the
Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and ‘General Rural’ under the
City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is
currently seeking public comment on proposed minor MRS Amendment 1216/57 for
the Wangara Industrial Precinct, which proposes to rezone approximately 81 ha
of land in Wangara and Gnangara from ‘Rural’ to
‘Industrial’ under the MRS and to rationalise Bush Forever Site 463
in the MRS Bush Forever overlay. Approximately 20 hectares of Bush Forever, is
proposed to be retained as ‘Rural’ in the MRS. The MRS Amendment
1216/57 proposal is shown in Attachment 2.
The land to the south and west of the subject land is zoned
‘General Industrial’, the land to the north, north west and south
east of the subject land is zoned ‘Special Rural’ under DPS 2
whilst the land directly to the east associated with Lake Gnangara is reserved
in the MRS for ‘Parks and Recreation’.
The subject land is identified within the WAPC’s Draft
‘Industrial Land Strategy’ (ILS) as the Wangara Industrial
Extension Area (WIEA). Administration has been advised (by the Department of
Planning) that the ILS was recently finalised by the WAPC and has since been
endorsed by Cabinet. However, formal notification to this end has not yet
been received, nor has the ILS yet been released or published in its final
form.
The southern portion of the subject land is located within
the East Wanneroo Cell 8 – Agreed Structure Plan No. 10 (ASP 10) and is
identified in ASP 10 as requiring further detailed planning. The northern
portion of the subject land is located in the East Wanneroo Structure Plan
(EWSP) area and is also identified as requiring further planning.
The proposed MRS amendment and future amendment to DPS 2 constitute
the ‘further planning’ required to facilitate subdivision and
development of the subject land for industrial, conservation and community land
uses.
Detail
MRS
Amendment 1216/57
MRS Amendment 1216/57
proposes to rezone the following properties from ‘Rural’ to
‘Industrial’ under the MRS:
· Lots
3, 4, 9, 700 and 701 Sydney and Gnangara Roads, Wangara;
· Portions
of Lots 7, 6, 8, 10 and 13 Sydney Road and Gnangara Road, Wangara; and
· A
number of gazetted but unconstructed/unnamed public road reserves.
The Amendment also proposes to amend the MRS Bush Forever
overlay for Bush Forever Site 463 to reflect a proposed Negotiated Planning
Solution (NPS) for the site. The NPS proposes to rationalise the existing Bush
Forever 463 site, of approximately 31 ha, to include the majority of the
‘excellent’ and ‘very good’ condition vegetation on the
site and to introduce an ecological linkage to Gnangara Lake, creating a site
of approximately 20 ha.
Consultation
The WAPC released MRS Amendment
1216/57 for public comment in August this year. The WAPC wrote directly to
adjacent landowners affected by the Amendment. The Amendment was
advertised in the Government Gazette (30 August 2011), The West Australian (31
August 2011), the Joondalup/Wanneroo Weekender (1 September 2011) and the
Joondalup/Wanneroo Times (6 September 2011) and placed on the WAPC’s
website. All amending documents were displayed at the State Reference
Library, the offices of the WAPC, the City of Swan and the City of Wanneroo
during the public submission period (Tuesday, 30 August 2011 - Friday, 4
November 2011).
The Department of Planning has
advised that it only provided written notice of the proposal to the landowners
of the properties that are actually included in this MRS Amendment and that it
did not give written notice of the proposal to any adjacent landowners. As
such, it is likely that adjacent landowners would be unaware of the proposed
MRS Amendment, unless they noticed one of the public advertisements and were
able to identify the subject land as adjoining their property.
Although the consultation period
closed on 4 November 2011, the WAPC granted an extension of time (until after
the December 2011 Council meeting) for the City to comment on the proposal, in
light of the fact that the applicant had also submitted a proposed amendment to
DPS 2 (Amendment No. 123) to rezone the subject land under the City’s
Scheme simultaneously with the proposed MRS Amendment. However, since that
time, following further discussion with Administration, the applicant has
agreed to defer consideration of Amendment No. 123 to DPS 2, pending
finalisation of the current MRS amendment process. Additionally, this proposal
was discussed at the Council Forum on 22 November 2011.
Comment
The proposed MRS Amendment 1216/57 represents an important
extension to the existing Wangara Industrial Area as well as the
rationalisation of Bush Forever Site No. 463, which has become fragmented by
the Ocean Reef Road extension and is mainly in private ownership with no formal
management requirements.
The new industrial area is expected to support small
manufacturing, warehouse and distribution activities with lot sizes ranging
from approximately 1,500m2 to over 5,000m2. This
represents an opportunity to generate additional local employment (similar in
scale to those generated by Landcorp’s adjacent Enterprise Park
development) and will contribute to meeting both the State Government and the
City’s objectives for economic and employment self-sufficiency within the
sub region.
The Bush Forever NPS for Bush Forever Site No. 463 is
considered to provide a positive outcome for the remnant bushland in the area
as it protects the majority of high quality vegetation remaining, in an
unfragmented and viable configuration that is also linked to the Gnangara Lake
regional Parks and Recreation Reserve.
The proposed Amendment is considered to be consistent with
the recommendations of the Industrial Land Strategy (ILS) and the East Wanneroo
Structure Plan (EWSP). These two documents are discussed in detail below,
together with the major issues associated with the amendment, including
infrastructure, groundwater, contamination, protection of areas of
environmental significance, aboriginal heritage and the interface with existing
land uses.
Industrial Land Strategy
The subject land is identified within the WAPC’s ILS
as the WIEA. This area is shown as an extension to the existing Wangara
Industrial Estate which can be implemented in the short term to address the
immediate deficiency of industrial land in the North West sub region and will
respond to the forecast shortfall of approximately 877 ha of industrial land in
the North West sub region by 2031. The ILS acknowledges the requirement for
various factors to be considered through this future planning, including
groundwater protection, protection of areas of environmental significance,
infrastructure and the interface with existing land uses. Each if these issues
are discussed in detail later in the report. The Draft Industrial Land Strategy
was released for public comment in 2009 and, Administration is advised, was
recently endorsed by the WAPC, Infrastructure Coordinating Committee and the
State Government.
East Wanneroo Structure Plan
The northern part of the subject land falls within the EWSP
area and is designated as ‘Subject to Future Planning refer to
ILS’. At its meeting of 5 April 2011 (PS09-04/11), Council considered the
final East Wanneroo Structure Plan and resolved (among other things) to
reaffirm its decision from 11 December 2007, relating to planning proposals
within East Wanneroo, until such time as a policy has been prepared and adopted
by Council to define the City’s expectations and requirements for
progressing planning proposals within the EWSP area. In its 2007 decision,
Council essentially resolved to:
a) Endorse
a process prepared by Administration regarding the progress of planning in East
Wanneroo.
b) Not
to support any independent planning proposals for this area that may be viewed
as premature in relation to the aforementioned planning process.
At its September 2011 meeting, Council considered Amendment
No. 111 to DPS 2 – Rezoning of Lots 4 and 5 Mornington Drive Mariginiup
to ‘Restricted Use’ – Lifestyle Village (PS03-09/11), where
the small parcel of land subject of the proposal was designated as ‘Potential
Urban’ under the WAPC’s final EWSP. At that meeting, Council
refused to initiate the amendment for various reasons, generally on the basis
that it was considered premature and prejudicial to the overall planning still
required in the EWSP area.
Administration considers that MRS Amendment 1216/57 is
significantly distinct from Amendment No. 111, as the proposed amendment is
specifically contemplated in the EWSP as being ‘Subject to Further
Planning refer to ILS’, rather than an area within the ‘Potential
Urban’ area of the EWSP. The amendment has addressed all relevant
planning considerations required to be covered by the ILS, and it is therefore
not considered to be premature or prejudicial to the planning for the EWSP area
overall. In addition, Council’s support for the proposed MRS amendment
would not create an undesirable precedent for the premature progression of
urban rezoning proposals in the boarder EWSP area.
Further planning rationale supporting this opinion is
summarised below:
· The
subject area is located a significant distance from the land designated as
Urban or Potential Urban in the EWSP and therefore is considered that the
progression of this Amendment and subsequent amendment to DPS 2 to facilitate
the Wangara Industrial Extension Area for industrial land uses, as identified
in the EWSP and ILS, will not prejudice and is not dependent on higher level
district structure planning (or the like) for the ‘Urban’ component
of the EWSP. This was not the case in Amendment No. 111, where the land was designated
as ‘Potential Urban’ under the WAPC’s final ‘East
Wanneroo Structure Plan’. The proposed amendment to industrial will
in turn support the employment self-sufficiency targets identified in the EWSP. It is estimated that the
number of jobs generated by development within the proposed Wangara Industrial
Extension Area will be in the order of 3,200. The employment figures (per floor
area) are based on the 2006 figures for Industrial Complexes which are provided
in the ILS. The floor areas are calculated based on a 40-50% site cover of the
developable area.
· Amendment
No. 111 involved the site specific zoning of a substantially smaller area of
land (than proposed by this amendment) for a ‘Restricted Use’,
without seeking to change the rural zoning under the MRS.
· The
WAPC is currently advertising the MRS amendment as a minor amendment.
This would appear to suggest that the WAPC has no objection to the proposal,
particularly as it constitutes and satisfies the ‘further planning’
required by the EWSP and ILS, and accords with those documents.
Furthermore, the Negotiated Planning Solution and detailed investigations have
been undertaken to ensure the suitability of the area for industrial use.
· The
MRS amendment itself will not result in the land being developed for industrial
(and other) purposes. A further amendment will be required to DPS 2,
together with subsequent detailed planning and approval processes, which will
separately involve public advertising, detailed assessment and determination,
and input from government agencies.
· The
EWSP acknowledges the ILS requirements that ‘Investigation of land for
industrial purposes will require consideration of various factors including
groundwater protection, interface with existing land uses , protection of areas
of environmental significance and limited availability of
infrastructure’. These matters have been identified and addressed
below and will be further addressed in later planning processes. This
represents the further planning required to support the proposed industrial
zoning and to implement the recommendations of the ILS and EWSP.
Infrastructure
Servicing investigations confirm that the subject land can
be readily serviced by sewer, power and water services and there are no service
related constraints to the proposal. Traffic investigations have identified
that the subject land is well located in respect to the existing and future
regional road networks and that appropriate access to the site can be achieved.
Contamination
A Contamination Investigation Report was prepared by WSP
Environmental Consultants. The report concludes that contamination does not
represent an impediment to the proposed amendment. It is Administration’s
opinion that the proposal actually represents an opportunity for rehabilitation
of any contaminated portion of the subject land.
The DEC database identifies that a portion of Lot 6 is
possibly contaminated by some historic unauthorised inert landfill (typical of
building demolition material) and that further investigation is required. PPK
Consultants undertook preliminary investigations of the site on behalf of the
Department of Indigenous affairs in 2002 and concluded that the nature of
landfill reflected building demolition material and that there would be
significant cost in removing this material from the site. In consultation with
the DEC contaminated sites branch, further investigation is being undertaken to
characterise the material and to delineate the extent of the landfill.
Protection of Areas of Environmental Significance
Investigations have concluded that no threatened ecological
communities or declared flora are present on site, particularly within the
areas proposed to be developed for industrial purposes. The proposed NPS for
Bush Forever Site No. 463 has been designed to retain and protect the best
quality vegetation in a consolidated parcel and create a vegetated ecological
link to the adjacent Gnangara Lake, where none currently exists. Approximately
19 hectares of bushland will be retained, protected, rehabilitated and managed.
Statutory provisions could be applied through the future DPS
2 amendment to facilitate the long term management and protection of Bush
Forever Site No. 463. In addition a conservation covenant for the Bush Forever
area retained as part of the NPS is currently being progressed in consultation
with the DEC, prior to finalisation of the MRS amendment.
Wetlands and Groundwater
Two multiple use wetlands and Gnangara Lake have been
identified on or adjacent to the subject site, as follows:
· Multiple
Use Wetland (UF 8133) is located on the southern portion of the site;
· Multiple
Use Wetland (UFI 8138) is located outside of the subject area adjacent to the
northern boundary of Lot 10; and
· Gnangara
Lake Conservation Category Wetland (UFI 8139) is located outside of the subject
area to the east of Lot 10.
Multiple Use Wetland (UF 8133) is identified in ASP 10 and
is designated ‘Subject to Further Detailed Planning’. A portion of
Multiple Use Wetland (UFI 8138) is mapped as an Environmental Priority
Protection wetland by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The
Department of Environment and Conservation conducted an assessment of the
wetland as part of its assessment of MRS Amendment 1216/57 and concluded that
the wetland is a ‘seasonal wet depression, with apparently limited
hydrological connection to other wetland systems and no significant
biodiversity conservation values’. The wetland has a management
category of multiple use, which is the lowest conservation category.
The EPA has considered MRS Amendment 1216/57 and has
determined that the proposal, including the proposed development of the
wetland, is ‘Not Assessed’, meaning the environmental impacts of
the proposal are not significant enough to warrant formal assessment. It was
concluded that the wetland does not represent a constraint to the development
of the land for industrial purposes.
Water investigations and modelling undertaken by the
proponent have confirmed that the site is not constrained by the presence of
high groundwater levels, with good clearance to groundwater across the majority
of the site. Investigations have confirmed that the subject land is
hydraulically and topographically down gradient of Lake Gnangara and the
Gnangara Underground Pollution Control Area.
The impacts of development on ground surface water quality
and quantity can therefore be managed through the planning and development
process.
The Department of Water has approved a District Water
Management Strategy for the area indicating that the site is capable of
supporting the proposed land use from a water management perspective.
That Department has also provided a submission to the Department of Planning in
support of the proposed MRS amendment.
Aboriginal Heritage and Land Tenure Arrangements
Lots 6, 10 and 50 Sydney Road, within the subject area are
owned by the Aboriginal Lands Trust (ALT) and are currently leased to Nyoongah
Community Inc (NCI). The ALT land is in the process of being transferred
to the Noongar Charitable Trust (Trust), a not for profit entity established by
the South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council (SWALSC), which is the
representative body for the single native title claim being negotiated across
the South West region on behalf of the Noongar people.
The Noongar Charitable Trust will joint venture with the ALT
land and the adjacent turf farm land on a 50/50 basis together with parties
associated with Linc Property and FJM Property. The trust has been established
to utilise the funds realised from development of the land for a range of
community and capacity building measures, including education and training,
employment, business loans and housing assistance (e.g. shared equity
schemes). Administration has been advised by the proponent that this
proposal has the potential to create a significant pool of funds that can be
used to deliver a substantial benefit to the wider Noongar community.
The proponent has further advised that the proposal has
involved and received support from a range of key stakeholders including the
Aboriginal Lands Trust, the Department of Premier and Cabinet, the Minister for
Aboriginal Affairs, the Department of Indigenous Affairs and SWALSC.
The Gnangara Aboriginal Cemetery (Site ID 1017) occurs on a
portion of Lot 6. An investigation of Aboriginal Heritage matters has been
undertaken and it was confirmed that there are no registered sites occurring
within the area proposed to be rezoned ‘Industrial’
Interface with Surrounding Land Uses
A large portion of the subject land is bound by existing
industrial land uses. However, the part of the subject land to the north of
Ocean Reef Road is adjacent to areas zoned ‘Special Rural’ to the
north, north-west and south-east and the Gnangara Lake ‘Parks and
Recreation’ reserve to the east. A Bush Forever interface is proposed to
separate the proposed industrial areas from the existing ‘Special
Rural’ areas to the north and north-west, while the ‘Other Regional
Road’ reserve for Sydney Road separates the proposed industrial area from
the ‘Special Rural’ area to the south-east and Gnangara Lake to the
east.
Appropriate local planning scheme zones, further detailed
planning and land use controls will provide ample opportunity to address and
achieve an appropriate interface with the existing ‘Special Rural’
land uses.
Transport and traffic
Traffic investigations have confirmed that the proposed
rezoning will have a minimal impact on the operation of the existing or future
road network, with all affected roads forecast to operate with acceptable
levels of service. Current access to the subject land is via Gnangara Road and
Sydney Road. In the future, primary access will be from Ocean Reef Road, and
secondary access to the northern part of the subject land will be via Sydney
Road.
It is noted that Main Roads WA and the Department of
Transport have raised no objections to the proposed MRS amendment.
Conclusion
The proposed MRS Amendment accords with key State Government
planning documents and will facilitate the expansion of the Wangara Industrial
Area, significantly contributing to the generation of employment in the City of
Wanneroo and the North West sub region overall. The relevant planning, environmental,
water, servicing, traffic and land use compatibility issues have all been
adequately addressed to this stage of the planning process and can be further
refined and addressed at later stages of the planning and development process
if the MRS amendment is gazetted.
Therefore, for the reasons set out in this report,
Administration recommends that Council supports the MRS Amendment.
Statutory
Compliance
MRS Amendment 1216/57 will
follow the statutory process outlined in the Planning and Development Act 2005
for a ‘minor’ amendment.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.1 Improve
conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas
3 Economic
3.1 Create
strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands
3.2 Support
business and initiatives”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council SUPPORTS Metropolitan Region Scheme
Amendment 1126/57, as advertised, and FORWARDS a copy of this report to the
Western Australian Planning Commission as the basis of the City’s
submission.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1- Location Plan
|
11/135707
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Proposed minor MRS Amendment 1216/57
as advertised
|
11/113756
|
|
City Businesses
Regulatory Services
CB01-12/11 Provision
of an Emergency Services Levy Grant Scheme Funded Incident Control Vehicle
File Ref: 3916V02
– 11/131436
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider entering into a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with the Fire and Emergency Services Authority of Western Australia
(FESA) for the provision of an Emergency Services Levy (ESL) Grant Scheme
funded Incident Control Vehicle (ICV).
Background
FESA has approved ESL Grant Scheme funding for the provision
of a replacement ICV.
Detail
The ICV is a vehicle that forms part of an integrated
network of response vehicles and arrangements within Western Australia.
Although intended for use at a regional level, the vehicle will be branded with
a livery reflecting the Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade and FESA, and will be based
at Wanneroo.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
A copy of the MOU for the Provision of an Emergency Services
Levy Grant Scheme Funded Incident Control Vehicle is attached to this report (Attachment
1). The MOU clearly outlines the objectives of the MOU, and the acknowledgement
and undertakings of both FESA and the City of Wanneroo.
The MOU will remain as a guiding management document for the
period that an ESL Grant Scheme funded and maintained ICV remains with the
City, with a formal review to be conducted between the parties at least once
every three years.
Statutory
Compliance
The MOU does not constitute or create, and shall not be
deemed to constitute any legally binding or enforceable obligations on the part
of either the City of Wanneroo or FESA.
The City of Wanneroo and FESA have obligations under the
following legislation in relation to the provision of fire management services:
· Fire Brigades
Act 1942
· Bush Fires Act
1954
· FESA WA Act
1998
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
All capital and operating costs for the ICV will be funded
through the ESL Grant Scheme.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES
the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Memorandum of Understanding between the
Fire and Emergency Services Authority of Western Australia and the City of
Wanneroo for the Provision of an Emergency Services Levy Grant Funded Incident
Control Vehicle; and
2. NOTES
the Memorandum of Understanding will remain in force for the period that an
Emergency Services Levy Grant Scheme funded and maintained Incident Control
Vehicle remains with the City, with a formal review to be conducted between the
parties at least once every three years.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
FESA CoW MOU - Provision of an Emergency Services
Levy Grant Scheme Funded Incident Control Vehicle (ICV)
|
11/131479
|
|
MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE
FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
AUTHORITY OF
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
AND
CITY OF WANNEROO
FOR
PROVISION OF AN EMERGENCY
SERVICES LEVY
GRANT SCHEME FUNDED
INCIDENT CONTROL VEHICLE
1. PURPOSE
This Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) is intended to identify and document the arrangements, in relation
to the provision and requirements for the allocation of an Emergency Services
Levy Grant Scheme funded emergency response Incident Control Vehicle (ICV),
between the City of Wanneroo (City) and the Fire and Emergency Services
Authority of Western Australia, (FESA).
This MOU does not constitute or create, and
shall not be deemed to constitute, any legally binding or enforceable
obligations on the part of any party.
2. FESA
This MOU will support
FESA’s mission, vision and values:
Mission: In
partnership with the people of Western Australia to:
· Improve
community safety practices; and
· Provide
timely, quality and effective emergency services.
Vision: A
safer community.
Values: Put
the community first;
Work
together as a committed team;
Respect
and value each other;
Continuously
improve our service;
Act
with integrity and honesty;
Have
open and honest two-way communications; and
Strive
to keep ourselves and others safe.
3. CITY OF WANNEROO
Vision:
The City of Wanneroo, the centre for creative and sustainable growth,
delivering strong, vibrant and connected communities.
Mission:
Through strategic partnerships and effective leadership, we will
provide spaces, places and
services that:
· Build
on our natural resources and cultural heritage
· Create
distinct and vibrant village communities
· Enhance
lifestyle choices
· Foster
economic prosperity
· Encourage
citizen and stakeholder participation in governance and development decisions.
Values: Our values
describe our core beliefs and guide our behaviour as individuals and as an
organisation so that we can achieve our vision and improve the quality of
services we offer to the community.
Team
work: we build functional relationships and work collaboratively to achieve
common goals.
Integrity:
we behave in an honest, open, respectful and accountable manner.
Communication:
we practice clear and timely exchange of information and feedback.
Innovation:
we add creativity and excitement to the workplace and projects we
undertake.
Continuous
Improvement: we build capacity by improving our systems and processes.
Valuing Our People: we
are committed to providing a safe workplace and the development of a healthy,
productive, flexible and skilled workforce to adequately resource the
organisation.
4. DEFINITIONS
BFS Bush
Fire Service
CBFCO Chief
Bush Fire Control Officer
COMCEN FESA Communications
Centre
DM
(BFS) District
Manager (Bush Fire Service)
ESL Emergency
Services Levy
ICV Incident
Control Vehicle
5. MOU
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this MOU are;
5.1 To
establish specific responsibilities with respect to the provision of a
strategic Incident Control Vehicle to the City, in particular regarding:
§ requirements and standards for
funding, maintenance and repair for the allocated vehicle;
§ minimum standards of brigade
capability in relation to manning and response times;
§ service delivery standards, turnout
arrangements and authorised use of the vehicle; and
§ future
Resource to Risk reviews and the understanding that the vehicle may be
recommended to be reallocated to reflect changes in risk.
5.2 To
establish an agreement between the City of Wanneroo and FESA, under Part 3
section 12(2)(e) and (f) of the Fire and Emergency Services Authority of
Western Australia Act 1998, to ensure the City and its brigades are
supported, trained, equipped and capable of providing appropriate and timely
emergency services to the WA community.
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
AND UNDERTAKINGS BY FESA
FESA acknowledges it shall:
6.1 provide
through ESL Grant Scheme funding an Incident Control Vehicle, with livery
reflecting the Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade and FESA, which will be available
for use in that Brigade’s normal operations;
6.2 provide
and support the City with standards for servicing and maintaining the Incident
Control Vehicle, including an audit and technical support function to ensure
allocated vehicles reach their serviceable life;
6.3 provide
ESL Grant Scheme funding to maintain, repair and operate the Incident Control
Vehicle under the terms of this agreement; and
6.4 notify
the City’s CBFCO / FESA’s DM (BFS) through an appropriate means at
any time the vehicle is mobilised outside its primary response area.
7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
AND UNDERTAKINGS BY THE CITY OF WANNEROO
The City acknowledges:
7.1 that
the Incident Control Vehicle is a strategic appliance that forms part of an
integrated network of response vehicles and arrangements within Western
Australia;
7.2 and
agrees the response area will include areas outside but adjacent to the
City. Therefore this vehicle may be mobilised regularly and for extended
durations to incidents outside the boundaries of the City at the discretion of
FESA with notification to the City’s CBFCO / FESA’s DM (BFS);
7.3 that
emergency vehicles are required to respond in a timely manner and therefore the
Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade will be required to maintain the capability to
mobilise the vehicle both within and outside the City for extended periods of
time. If the Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade is unable to maintain this
capability the City agrees to immediately return the vehicle to FESA for
reallocation (Note: a lack of capability is not demonstrated by a single
event provided for in clause 7.4 below);
7.4 that
if the Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade are unable to mobilise the Incident
Control Vehicle then FESA will be provided access to the vehicle and may crew
and deploy the vehicle;
7.5 that
the Incident Control Vehicle will only be utilised for Emergency Service
requirements and use for other activities will require the agreement of the
FESA Chief Operations Officer or delegated authorised officer; and
7.6 that
FESA will conduct future Resource to Risk reviews over the life of the Incident
Control Vehicle and should the outcome of a review identify the community would
be better serviced through the reallocation of the Incident Control Vehicle
then the City, upon request from FESA, undertakes to return the vehicle
for reallocation.
8. DURATION
AND AMENDMENT
This MOU will remain in force
for the period that an ESL Grant Scheme funded and maintained Incident Control
Vehicle remains within the City, with a formal review to be conducted between
the parties at least once every three years.
This Agreement shall not be
altered, varied or modified in any respect except by agreement in writing.
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The parties must first attempt
to resolve any dispute arising between them in relation to any matter the
subject of this MOU by way of conference and negotiation. The parties
must confer and negotiate within 7 days of receiving a written notice from the
other party setting out the nature of the dispute.
If the issue cannot be resolved
by negotiation then the matter of dispute is to be conferred, deliberated and
resolved by the FESA CEO or a nominated delegate and the City’s CEO or a
nominated delegate.
10. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated
by:
· either
party by giving three months notice in writing to the other party at anytime;
and/or
· the
ESL Grant Scheme funded Incident Control Vehicle being returned to FESA.
11. NOTICES
Notices or other communications by each party to each other
and under this MOU must, unless otherwise notified in writing, be addressed and
forwarded as follows:
FESA
Chief Executive Officer
Fire
and Emergency Services Authority of Western Australia
FESA
House
PO
Box P1174
PERTH
WA 6844
Chief
Executive Officer
City of Wanneroo
Locked Bag 1
Wanneroo
WA 6946
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding
is made
BETWEEN THE
Fire and Emergency Services
Authority of Western Australia
480 Hay Street
PERTH WA 6000
AND
City of Wanneroo
23 Dundebar Road
Wanneroo WA 6065
and will take effect from the
date of the last signature
SIGNED for and on behalf of the Fire and Emergency
Services Authority of Western Australia by:
WAYNE GREGSON ___________________________ ____________
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER Signature Date
SIGNED
for and on behalf of the City of Wanneroo by:
DANIEL
SIMMS ___________________________ ____________
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER Signature Date
City Business
CB02-12/11 Expenditure
of Surplus Reserve Funds - Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) Reserve
File Ref: 5408
– 11/114449
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the expenditure of funds set aside in the
Materials Recycling Facility (MRF) Upgrade Reserve.
Background
The reserve was established to set aside funds received from
the operating partners (the Cities of Swan and Joondalup) of the MRF, now
termed the Wangara Recycling Centre (WRC) for the planned capital upgrade of
the MRF which was consequently undertaken in 2006/07. The reserve was used to
quarantine these funds to ensure transparency in the financial management of
the capital upgrades.
A summary of the transactions associated with the reserve
since 2006/07 is included in the table below:
|
|
Actual 05/06
|
Actual 06/07
|
Actual 07/08
|
Actual 08/09
|
Actual 09/10
|
Actual 10/11
|
Budget 11/12
|
|
Materials Recovery
Facility – Upgrade Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening Balance
|
|
0
|
2,975,349
|
241,099
|
358,439
|
376,158
|
396,873
|
|
Transfers In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
3,600,000
|
50,000
|
300,000
|
0
|
0
|
90,000
|
|
Interest Received
|
|
101,949
|
85,895
|
16,619
|
17,719
|
22,678
|
19,899
|
|
Redundant Machinery
|
|
|
142,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Transfers Out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR-2279, PR-2280, PR-1556.
|
|
-726,600
|
-3,012,145
|
-199,279
|
0
|
-1,963
|
-69,666
|
|
Closing Balance
|
|
2,975,349
|
241,099
|
358,439
|
376,158
|
396,873
|
437,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial contribution of $3,600,000 comprised of an equal
contribution of $1,200,000 by each partner.
Current commitments against this reserve for the 2011/12
financial year include the following:
|
Project
|
Description
|
Adopted Budget 2011/12
|
MRF Upgrade Reserve Allocation
|
|
PR-2279
|
WRC New Plant
Purchase
|
$9,000
|
$3,000
|
|
PR-2280
|
WRC Plant Audit
|
$50,000
|
$16,666
|
|
PR-1556
|
Wangara MRF – Upgrade
Existing Facilities (OSH Improvements) Re-location of Oil and Battery Storage
Areas.
|
$150,000
|
$50,000
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$69,666
|
Contributions budgeted into the reserve for the period
2012/13 to 2020/21 are notionally $90,000 per annum and commitments budgeted
against the reserve for the same period are $125,000 per annum (against PR-1556
Wangara Recycling Centre – Modifications to existing facilities to
provide operational efficiencies). This report will recommend that the reserve
be closed and on this basis the forecasted contributions and commitments should
also be removed from the 10 Year Capital Works Program. The WRC partners have
agreed that they will be invoiced for their capital contribution at the
completion of each individual capital project, thus negating the need for their
annual contribution to the reserve.
Detail
As detailed above, the balance of the reserve is $396,873,
as of 20 October 2011. Discussions held between the respective Administrations
of the WRC partners has lead to agreement that a report should be put to the
City of Wanneroo Council seeking approval to expend these funds on current
capital projects before existing budgeted capital contributions for the 2011/12
financial year are expended. This is, of course, taking into account any
funding commitments from the reserve for the 2011/12 financial
year.
As a result, the following project expenditure has been
identified:
1. Wangara
Recycling Centre (WRC) – New Office and Staff Facilities.
This project was approved by the
Council in its 15 November 2011 meeting (CB03-11/11), for Tender No. 01132
Design and Construct of New Office and Staff Facilities at the Wangara
Recycling Centre, 86 Motivation Drive.
The project involves the
construction of a new office, staff lunchroom and toilet facilities for staff
at the Wangara Recycling Centre. The current staff facilities are substandard
and limited office space means that the Business Manager and Administration
Officer are located at Enterprise House, which is impacting on the
effectiveness of the management team.
The tender report for this
project indicates funding requirements of $113,759 from the reserve. This
is based on an initial project budget of $170,000 (initially listed in 2010/11)
and a confirmed project cost as a result of the tender outcome of $283,759. The
initial budget of $170,000 is being funded via a one third contribution from
each partner. The City of Wanneroo’s contribution is being funded from
the Domestic Refuse Reserve.
2. Wangara
Recycling Centre – Installation of Glass Separating and Grading System
Upgrade.
The tender outcome for this
project Tender No. 01120, was endorsed by Council at its meeting on 26 July
2011 (CB06-07/11). The project involves the installation of additional
equipment that will re-direct glass currently going to the waste stream,
separate it from other waste and recyclable material and grade it into glass
fines (< 10mm in size) and glass cullet (>10mm in size). This will result
in a higher grade of glass product, improving the price per tonne to the market
and reducing the amount of material going to landfill, thus reduce tipping
fees.
The total cost of the project is
$424,580 with a project budget of $435,900 being available within PR-1555:
Wangara MRF – Construct New Glass Sanding Unit. This project is being
funded via a one-third contribution from each partner. The City of
Wanneroo’s contribution is being funded from the Domestic Refuse Reserve.
3. Wangara
Recycling Centre – New Hard Cover for Glass Loading Area
This project is linked to the
Glass Separating and Grading System Upgrade project and involves the
installation of a hard cover area of the existing loading area for the glass
product produced by the upgraded plant. The existing loading area includes two
silos which are no longer able to be used as per their intended use and
represent a potential safety risk to staff on site. The proposed structure is a
four post design with a colourbond roof and open sides, providing a 72 square meter
roof span with an estimated cost of $45,000 (quoted October 2011).
The structure is required based
on advice from Colmax Glass (a potential commodity buyer who re-process glass
for on-sale) that wet glass will impact on the quality of the product and hence
the potential income to be realised per tonne for the WRC. The requirement to
keep the glass dry has not been identified by any other potential commodity
buyer, however the proposed structure will provide the WRC with the ability to
also store some paper and cardboard bales under cover.
It should be noted that this
project is not currently listed on the 2011/12 Capital Works Budget. For the
purposes of this report, this project has been listed against PR-1556 Wangara
MRF – Upgrade Existing Facilities.
Consultation
The Director City Businesses has consulted with the Director
Infrastructure Services from the City of Joondalup and the Executive Manager
– Operations from the City of Swan, in addition with internal
stakeholders in Finance and the Chief Operations Officer.
Comment
The utilisation of the funds from the MRF Upgrade Reserve
will reduce the capital funding required to be put forward by all three
partners in the 2011/12 financial year.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.4 Maintain
long-term financial stability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The table below outlines the proposed use of the current
reserve balance of $396,837, based on the projects identified within the body
of the report.
|
Item
|
Balance
|
Expenditure
|
Description
|
|
Opening Balance
|
$396,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding Commitments for
2011/12 as per adopted budget
|
|
$69,666
|
PR-2279 (WRC New Plant
Purchases), PR-2280 (WRC Plant Audit), PR-1556 (WRC Upgrade Existing
Facilities – Oil and Battery Storage Re-location).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available Balance
|
$327,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Expenditure
|
|
|
|
|
PR-1556
|
|
$113,759
|
Tender No. 01132 –
Design and Construct of New Office and Staff Facilities at the WRC. To fund
difference in project cost ($283,759) to project budget ($170,000).
|
|
PR-1555
|
|
$45,000
|
New Hard Cover for Glass
Loading Area
|
|
PR-1555
|
|
$168,448
|
Tender No. 01120 –
Supply and Installation of Glass Separating and Grading System. Project cost
$435,900. Balance ($267,452) to be funded by partners. City of Wanneroo
contribution to be funded from Domestic Refuse Reserve as per the 2011/12
adopted budget. .
|
|
Total
|
|
$327,207
|
|
|
Closing Balance
|
$0
|
|
|
It should be noted that multiple projects are listed under
PR-1556.
It should also be noted that all of the projects listed,
with the exception of the New Hard Cover for Glass Loading Area are existing
projects with approved budgets. The intent of this report is to use the reserve
funds towards the cost of these projects before existing budgeted capital
contributions for the 2011/12 financial year (or part thereof) are expended. In
essence this is a re-allocation of funding to meet the existing budget
commitments.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following budget variations to fully expend the
sum of $396,873, being the current balance of the Materials Recovery Facility
Upgrade Reserve; and
|
Project
No./Account Code
|
From
|
To
|
Description
|
|
Materials Recovery
Facility Upgrade Reserve
|
$327,207
|
|
Reserve funds set
aside for capital improvements at the Wangara Recycling Centre –
Materials recovery Facility.
|
|
PR-1556
|
|
$113,759
|
Wangara MRF –
Upgrade Existing Facilities. Tender No. 01132 Design and Construction of New
Office and Staff Facilities at the WRC.
|
|
PR-1556
|
|
$45,000
|
New Hard Cover for
Glass Loading Area.
|
|
PR-1555
|
|
$168,448
|
Wangara MRF –
Upgrade Existing Facilities. Tender No. 01120 – Supply and Installation
of Glass Separating and Grading System
|
2. APPROVES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the closure of the Materials Recovery
Facility Upgrade Reserve.
Attachments: Nil
Infrastructure
Infrastructure Maintenance
IN01-12/11 Installation
of a Fully Monitored Fire and Smoke Detection System at Aquamotion
File Ref: 1702
– 11/131890
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider allocation of funds for the installation of a
Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) fully monitored fire and smoke
detection system at Wanneroo Aquamotion.
Background
Wanneroo Aquamotion upgrade works were undertaken three
years ago and under the Building Code of Australia the building was classified
as 9b. An Emergency Warning Intercommunication System (EWIS) and eight smoke
detectors linked to the intruder alarm system were installed to suit the
classification of the building.
In the event of a fire emergency, an alarm is sent to the
City’s monitoring company who contact the City’s Rangers, who in
turn call FESA. This facility is a public facility and in addition to the
City’s own staff, a large number of users visit daily. Under the current
EWIS system there is a delay in contacting FESA. This represents a
significant risk to the building fabric and safety of staff and visitors. To
mitigate the risk, the fire and smoke detection system at Wanneroo Aquamotion
requires an upgrade to allow automatic notification to FESA in case of a fire
emergency.
Detail
Electrical consultant, Best Consultancy, was appointed to
undertake a review of the current installations at Wanneroo Aquamotion, and
prepare a proposal to include a detailed design and specification for a fully
monitored fire and smoke detection system.
The proposal recommends installation of a fully monitored
fire and smoke detection system which is monitored directly by FESA and
provides 24 hour protection to the building and its occupants. The system will
have a number of smoke detectors, heat detectors, optical beam type smoke
detectors and visual warning devices connected to a new fire indicator panel in
a cabinet. It is proposed to replace the existing EWIS system currently located
in the Centre Manager’s office with a combined EWIS and fully monitored
fire and smoke detection system located in a new cabinet close to the front door.
The proposed system will also have capability to detect and notify chlorine gas
leakage from the plant located at this facility.
The design of the fully monitored fire and smoke detection
system will be assessed by a fire engineering consultant prior to seeking final
approval from FESA. The consultant has estimated that the installation of the
new system will be $90,000. Subject to FESA’s approval, the installation
will be undertaken during April to June 2012.
Consultation
The proposal to install the fully monitored fire and smoke
detection system at this site has been developed in consultation with FESA.
Comment
The current fire and smoke detection system installed at
Wanneroo Aquamotion is adequate for monitoring purposes, however it does not
fully protect the facility from a fire emergency and the provisions to notify
FESA directly. In case of a fire emergency, it is vital that FESA attend site
without any lost time. The installation of a directly linked system will
safeguard the City and reduce the risks associated with a fire emergency.
Statutory
Compliance
The provision of a fully monitored fire and smoke detection
system at Wanneroo Aquamotion will comply with the requirements of the Building
Code of Australia.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
This project is not included in the approved 2011/12 Capital
Works Budget. Funds totalling $240,000 have been allocated in PR-1904 Building
Asset Renewal Program. It is proposed to transfer $90,000 from PR-1904 Building
Asset Renewal Program to fund this work.
The Building Asset Renewal Program which includes renewal of
different assets at a number of buildings will be reviewed and limited to
$160,000 in 2011/12.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the installation of a fire and smoke detection system at Wanneroo Aquamotion,
fully monitored by Fire and Emergency Services Authority;
2. Pursuant
to Section 6.8(1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE
MAJORITY expenditure of $90,000 for the installation of a fire and smoke
detection system at Wanneroo Aquamotion;
3. NOTES
the following budget variation to accommodate the expenditure for the
installation of a fire and smoke detection system at Wanneroo Aquamotion:
EXPENDITURE
|
COST CODE
|
FROM
|
TO
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
Project No
PR - 1904
|
$90,000
|
|
Building Asset Renewal Program
|
|
Project
No. - New
|
|
$90,000
|
Wanneroo Aquamotion fully monitored fire and smoke
detection system
|
4. NOTES
that the installation of the new fire and smoke detection system at Wanneroo
Aquamotion will be undertaken after obtaining necessary approval from the Fire
and Emergency Services Authority.
Attachments: Nil
Infrastructure Projects
IN02-12/11 Flynn
Drive Realignment Project
File Ref: 2810
– 11/133511
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Replacement report will be tabled at the Council meeting due
to late advice on this matter from the Minister for Transport.
Tenders
IN03-12/11 Tender
No. 01133 for Supply and Installation of Fencing (Panel Contract) for a Period
of One Year
File Ref: 6570
– 11/121411
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01133 for Supply and Installation of
Fencing (Panel Contract) within the City of Wanneroo for a Period of One Year.
Background
Fencing is a widespread activity associated with
Infrastructure’s operations and the objective of this contract is to
engage a panel of contractors that can provide a wide variety of fence types to
meet the needs of construction and maintenance activity requirements.
The expiring contract for fencing (Contract No. 09041)
provides for limited fence types. The key difference associated with the new
tender is the inclusion of every fence type that is typically likely to be
required by the City on a sustained basis. New categories of fencing in this
contract include rabbit proof fencing and gates, horse gates, sand trapping
fencing, colourbond fencing, temporary and permanent chainmesh fencing. These
fence types are additional to timber bollards, sump and pedestrian chainmesh
fencing, road frontage and conservation fencing which have typically been the
main types of fencing procured under the existing contract.
The contract has been let as a panel contract because of the
categories of fence types covered by this contract and the acknowledgement that
different fencing companies specialise in different fence types and competitive
pricing is determined accordingly.
Detail
Tender No. 01133 for Supply and
Installation of Fencing within the City of Wanneroo for a Period of One Year
was advertised on 24 September 2011 and closed on 18 October 2011.
A copy of the Tender Document as
advertised has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room for reference.
Essential details of the
contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type
|
Schedule
of Rates
|
|
Contract Duration
|
1
Year
|
|
Commencement Date
|
1
January 2012
|
|
Expiry Date
|
31
December 2012
|
|
Extension to Contract
|
Yes,
two 12 month options, CPI adjusted
|
|
Rise and Fall Included
|
No
|
Tenders
Received
Tender
submissions were received from the following companies:
|
Company
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
All submissions were accepted on the basis
that they were compliant and worthy of inclusion in the tender evaluation
process.
The Tender Evaluation Team,
consisting of the Projects Engineer, Coordinator Conservation Maintenance and
the Contracts Officer, has evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with
the following selection criteria:
|
Item No
|
Description
|
Score
|
|
1
|
Price for the services offered
|
50%
|
|
2
|
Tenderer’s experience and ability to do the work
|
20%
|
|
3
|
Tenderer’s resources
|
20%
|
|
4
|
Safety Management
|
10%
|
Price
for the Services Offered (50%)
All tenderers submitted prices
for various items in the tender specification and scope of works. Reliable
Fencing’s submission included lowest prices for the majority of the 108
schedule line items. Austec’s submission contained prices that were highest
for the majority of items with no prices being cheapest for any of the line
items. Fencewright did not provide any schedule line items that were cheapest
in their submission.
The assessment has resulted in the
tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
1
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
3
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
4
|
Tenderer’s
experience and ability to do the work (20%)
Assessment of this criterion
considered the qualifications and experience demonstrated by each of the
tenderers. Reliable Fencing refer to their current commitments with the City
and the City of Swan, together with fencing provision for numerous current subdivisional
developments as a sound experience profile in carrying out work similar to that
required in this contract. Southern Wire cited previous relevant experience
with six metropolitan local authorities as relevant previous experience.
Fencewright also has a good level of experience with previous work for clients
such as Main Roads Western Australia, WA Planning Commission and City of
Gosnells being significant and relevant.
The information provided has resulted in
the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
1
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
1
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
3
|
Tenderer’s
Resources (20%)
The tenderer’s resources
contained in the tender documentation were examined in order to evaluate their
ability to meet the requirements of the contract. Assessment of this criterion
considered the tenderer’s staff resources, vehicles and plant/equipment
to manage the contract. The Reliable Fencing, Southern Wire and Fencewright
submissions outlined equally high levels of relevant resources available
without any excessive current commitments that could compromise their ability
to deliver the required services in a timely manner. The remaining submissions
provided fair offers in terms of resource adequacy.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows
under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
1
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
1
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
3
|
Safety
Management (10%)
Evidence of safety management
policies and practices defined in the tender documents was assessed
accordingly. The assessment for safety management was based on the
tenderers’ responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management
System Questionnaire included within the tender documentation.
All tenderers provided details of their
safety management systems. Southern Wire and Reliable Fencing provided superior
information in their submissions in relation to fulfilment of safety management
requirements. JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire Pty Ltd provided marginal
information which set their submission apart from the other submissions, hence
scoring lowest in the safety management assessment process.
The information provided has resulted in
the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
2
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
3
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
4
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
5
|
Overall
Weighted Score
The tenderer’s submissions
were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process with the
following observations being of significance:
– the
key aspect of the tender evaluation is price
– the
submissions were evaluated in accordance with the selection criteria and were
assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience, ability and
safety management systems to undertake the tender
The overall weighted score has resulted in
the following tender ranking:
|
Tenderer
|
Score
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
1
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Fencewright Pty Ltd Trading as
Fencewright
|
3
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire
Pty Ltd
|
4
|
|
Austec Building and
Constructions Pty Ltd
|
5
|
The top two tenderers, Reliable
Fencing and Southern Wire Pty Ltd, have been evaluated to have the capacity to
provide for all the City’s fencing needs under the terms of the tender
document. Acceptance of a panel consisting of these two tenderers is
recommended by the Tender Evaluation Team.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The tender submissions from Reliable Fencing and Southern
Wire Pty Ltd achieved the highest score in accordance with the assessment
criteria and weighting as detailed in the tender document and are therefore
recommended as the successful tenderers. Both contractors have previously
provided acceptable service provision to the City in relation to fencing activities.
As per the provisions made in the tender document which will
subsequently be included in the contract agreements, the City has the
discretion to award work to the contractors appointed on the Panel. The work
will be awarded to the contractors on the Panel, based on the lowest estimated
cost of the work each time there is a need to utilise the services of a
contractor for the fencing work. If the lowest cost contractor is not available
to meet the time frame requirements, then the work will be awarded to the other
contractor on the Panel.
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of
Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve
the quality of the built environment”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Based on the schedule of rates provided by the two tenderers
being proposed to form a panel, namely; Reliable Fencing and Southern Wire Pty
Ltd; the following parameters have been assessed to determine the total annual
estimated value of works for the contract period:
– Historic
quantity of fencing installed by the City;
– Types
of construction/maintenance works carried out; and,
– Expected
maintenance activity and projects as identified in the City’s 10-year Capital
Works Program.
As a consequence, the total annual estimated value of works
for the contract period is predicted to be $300,000. This cost is to be
accommodated from existing and future allocated maintenance operating and
Capital Works budgets.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS
the tenders submitted by Reliable Fencing and Southern Wire Pty Ltd to form a
Panel for Tender No 01133 Supply and Installation of Fencing (Panel Contract)
for a period of One Year from 1 January 2012 As per the respective
tenderer’s schedule of rates, the general conditions of tendering and
with options to extend the contracts for a further two 12 month periods, or
part thereof, with CPI applied; and
2. NOTES
that the letter of tender award will advise Reliable Fencing and Southern Wire
Pty Ltd that work will be awarded to the contractors on the Panel, based
on the lowest estimated cost of the work each time there is a need to utilise
the services of a contractor for the fencing work. If the lowest cost
contractor is not available to meet the time frame requirements, the work will
be awarded to the other contractor on the panel.
Attachments: Nil
IN04-12/11 Tender
No. 01140 - Supply and Laying of Block Turf (Panel Contract) for a Period of
One Year
File Ref: 6570
– 11/124695
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil.
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01140 for Supply and Laying of Block
Turf (Panel Contract) for a Period of One Year.
Background
The supply and laying of block turf is currently provided to
the City by State Wide Turf Services under a Period Quotation that expired on
18 November 2011. Due to the expected increase in the value of the supply
and laying of block turf in 2012 and into the future it is now prudent to move
to a public tender process to ensure that the City is receiving value for money
and is in compliance with the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations.
Detail
Tender No. 01140 for Supply and
Laying of Block Turf (Panel Contract) for a Period of One Year was advertised
on Saturday 22 October 2011 and closed on Tuesday 8 November 2011.
A copy of the Tender Document as
advertised has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room for reference.
Essential details of the
contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type
|
Schedule
of Rates
|
|
Contract Duration
|
One
(1) Year
|
|
Commencement Date
|
1
February 2012
|
|
Expiry Date
|
31
January 2013
|
|
Extension Permitted
|
Yes,
Two 12 month options, CPI adjusted
|
|
Rise and Fall Included
|
No
|
Tender submissions were received from the
following companies:
– Turfmaster
Facility Management.
– Lovegrove
Turf Services.
The Tender Evaluation Team,
consisting of the Coordinator Parks Maintenance South, Acting Manager
Infrastructure Maintenance and the Contracts Officer, has evaluated the tender
submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria:
|
Item No
|
Description
|
Score
|
|
1
|
Price for the goods and services offered
|
50%
|
|
2
|
Relevant experience & track record
|
25%
|
|
3
|
Resources and capacity to perform work
|
15%
|
|
4
|
Safety management
|
10%
|
Price
for the Goods and Services Offered (50%)
The tenderers were asked to
submit a schedule of rates for works detailed in the specification. Based on
estimated future quantity of services likely to be required under the contract,
an overall cost was calculated for both tenderers. For work where minimum
charges apply, Lovegrove Turf Services provided better value for smaller
quantities and Turfmaster Facility Management provided better value for larger
quantities.
The information provided, has
resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Facility Management
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
2
|
Tenderer’s
Experience (25%)
Turfmaster Facility Management
and Lovegrove Turf Services both have extensive experience in supply and laying
of turf throughout Local and State Government sectors within Western Australia.
Both companies have the necessary experience to provide both large and small
scale commercial turfing services.
The information provided has
resulted in the tenderers being ranked equally under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Facility Management
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
1
|
Tenderer’s
Resources and Capacity (15%)
The tenderers resources contained in the tender
documentation were examined in order to evaluate their ability to meet the
requirements of the contract. Assessment of this criterion considered the
tenderer’s staff resources, vehicles, plant/equipment and workshop
support to manage the contract. Both tenderers were assessed as having similar
resources and capacity to undertake the contract.
The information provided has
resulted in the tenderers being ranked equally under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Facility Management
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
1
|
Safety
Management (10%)
Evidence of safety management
policies and practices was assessed from the tender documents. The
assessment for safety management was based on the tenderers’ responses to
an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included
within the tender documentation. Both tenderers have provided details of their
safety management systems.
The information provided has
resulted in the tenderers being ranked equally under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Facility Management
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
1
|
Overall
Weighted Score
The tenderer’s submissions
were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process with the
following observations being of significance:
– The
key aspect of the tender evaluation is price.
– The
companies’ bids were evaluated in accordance with the selection criteria
and were assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience,
ability and safety management systems to undertake the tender.
The overall weighted score has resulted in
the following tender ranking:
|
Tenderer
|
Score
|
|
Turfmaster Facility Management
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
2
|
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The tender submissions from Turfmaster Facility Management
and Lovegrove Turf Services were assessed in accordance with the assessment
criteria and weighting as detailed in the tender document and are therefore
recommended as the successful tenderers. Both tenderers have been assessed to
have the capability to provide the tendered services.
As per the provisions made in the tender document which will
subsequently be included in the contract agreements, the City has outlined a
procedure on how work will be awarded to the contractors appointed on the
Panel. As per this procedure, the work will be awarded to the contractors on
the panel, based on the lowest estimated cost of the work each time there is a
need to utilise the services of a contractor for the fencing work. If the
lowest cost contractor is not available to meet the time frame requirements,
then the work will be awarded to the other contractor on the panel.
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of
Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
2.2 Improve the
City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure
and recreation”
“4 Governance
4.4 Maintain
long-term financial stability”
Policy
Implications
Nil.
Financial
Implications
Based on the schedule of rates provided by the two tenderers
being proposed to form a panel, namely; Turfmaster Facility Management and
Lovegrove Turf Services; the following parameters have been assessed to
determine the total annual estimated value of works for the contract period:
– Historic
quantity of turf installed by the City;
– Types
of construction/maintenance works carried out; and,
– Expected
maintenance activity and projects as identified in the City’s 10-year
Capital Works Program.
As a consequence, the total annual estimated value of works
for the contract period is predicted to be $200,000. This cost is to be
accommodated from existing and future operating and Capital Works budgets.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the
tenders submitted by Turfmaster Facility Management and Lovegrove Turf
Services to form a Panel for Tender No. 01140 for Supply
and Laying of Block Turf (Panel Contract) for a Period of One Year
from 1 February 2012:
a) as
per the respective tenderer’s schedule of rates, the general conditions
of tendering, with options to extend the contracts for a further two 12-month
periods, or part thereof, with CPI applied; and
b) that work
will be awarded to the contractors on the Panel, based on the lowest estimated
cost of the work each time there is a need to utilise the services of a
contractor for the turf work. If the lowest cost contractor is not available to
meet the time frame requirements, the work will be awarded to the other contractor
on the panel.
Attachments: Nil
Traffic Management
IN05-12/11 PT03-06/11
- Lagoon Drive/Brazier Road Intersection - Request for Traffic Calming
File Ref: 3000
– 11/126078
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider a petition requesting the City to install
traffic calming measures along Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road, Yanchep, and a
resident request to improve safety for vehicles entering/exiting 15 Brazier
Road.
Background
Council received petition PT03-06/11 at its meeting of 28
June 2011. The petition reads:
“We, the undersigned, all
being Residents of the City of Wanneroo do formally request Council’s
consideration:
Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road in
Yanchep have for years been used as racetracks by irresponsible drivers. The
double fatality on 16 April 2011 was an accident begging to happen, which could
easily have involved innocent parties as well.
Both roads are configured to long
redundant standards of width and geometry, which promote excessive speed.
We put to Council the urgency of
installing traffic calming measures, including intersection treatments of
Lagoon/Brazier. Such measures have already been implemented in locations with
significantly less traffic.”
The petition was signed by 95 residents, representing 18
properties on Lagoon Drive, 6 properties on Brazier Road, and 51 other
properties throughout Yanchep and Two Rocks.
Additionally, the owners of 15 Brazier Road have also
approached the City on a number of occasions with their concerns over speeding
vehicles on Brazier Road. The crossover to their property is located just
over the crest of a rise on Brazier Road and north bound vehicles cannot be
observed when entering/exiting the property until they crest the hill.
Detail
Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road are both Local Distributor
Roads within the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy. Lagoon Drive,
between Marmion Avenue and Foreshore Vista, is constructed as a 10m wide single
carriageway. However, in the newer extension south of Foreshore Vista the
road is constructed as a boulevard with 5m wide carriageways and a 3m wide
median.
Brazier Road between Lagoon Drive and Compass Circle has
been constructed as a 10m wide single carriageway, while from Compass Circle to
Wilkie Avenue the road is constructed as a 7m wide single carriageway
undulating through the original dune system.
As constructed, these roads are capable of carrying up to
7,000 vehicles per day, including commercial vehicles, and have the potential
to accommodate a bus route. Both of these roads are currently covered by the
default ‘built up area’ speed limit of 50kph.
The following traffic count data for Brazier Road and Lagoon
Drive is provided for analysis.
Traffic Data
Definitions:
AWT Average
Weekday Traffic
vpd vehicles
per day
85%ile speed the
speed at or below which 85% of vehicles are travelling.
20km/h Pace
the 20km/h speed range in which the majority of
vehicles are travelling
% in Pace percentage
of total vehicles travelling within the 20km/h Pace range
Brazier Road – North of Lagoon Drive - 23
February 2011 - 3 March 2011
AWT 1159vpd
85%ile speed 63
km/h
Max Speed 106
km/h
20km/h Pace 44
– 64 km/h
% in Pace 72.4%
Brazier Road - South of Wilkie Avenue - 23 February
2011 - 3 March 2011
AWT 933vpd
85%ile speed 49km/h
Max Speed 92km/h
20km/h Pace 32--52km/h
% in Pace 80.5%
Lagoon Drive – West of Marmion Avenue - 30 June
2009 - 9 July 2009
AWT 2917vpd
85%ile speed 54
km/h
Max speed 93km/h
20km/h Pace 37
– 57 km/h
% in Pace 78.7%
Lagoon Drive – South of St Ives Drive - 26
March 2007 – 2 April 2007
AWT 1871
vpd
85%ile speed 63
km/h
Max speed 127
km/h
20km/h Pace 44–
64 km/h
% in Pace 76.8%
Crash data provided by Main
Roads WA, for the five years 2006 to 2010, record three accidents occurring on
Lagoon Drive, between Marmion Avenue and Foreshore Vista, with two resulting in
property damage only and one requiring hospital treatment. For Brazier
Road, between Lagoon Drive and Wilkie Avenue, two single vehicle accidents were
recorded with one resulting in property damage only and one requiring medical
attention. On the 16 April 2011 a fatal accident is reported as having
occurred at the intersection of Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road, however this
does not yet show on the available records.
Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan of the area
of interest.
Consultation
In addition to investigating the matters raised in the
petition, the City has been in discussion with the owners of 15 Brazier Road.
Subject to Council’s endorsement of the
recommendations made in this report, consultation with the residents of Lagoon
Drive and Brazier Road is also proposed to be undertaken.
Comment
To determine the justification and priority of any traffic
management works on Lagoon Drive or Brazier Road, the roads were assessed in
accordance with the City’s Traffic Management Investigation and
Intervention Policy (TM Policy), which assesses roads against a range of
criteria such as:
· Speed
· Traffic
volumes
· Crash
history
· Road
design and topography
· Vulnerable
road users - Pedestrians/Cyclists
The TM Policy requires a score of > 60 to qualify for
traffic management treatments, while scores between 30 and 60 points warrant
increased attention to law enforcement and driver education. The
assessment for Lagoon Drive, between Marmion Avenue and Foreshore Vista achieved
a score of 19, while Brazier Road, between Lagoon Drive and Wilkie Road,
achieved a score of 24. These scores include the fatal accident that
occurred in April 2011.
For a local distributor road with a bus route the TM Policy
discounts the score by 25 points in recognition of the importance of supporting
public transport by providing a smooth ride to patrons. If this score
adjustment is discounted, the resulting scores are 44 for Lagoon Drive and 49
for Brazier Road.
While the TM Policy scores are low, due to the general
layout of the roads there are some road safety issues that need addressing. The
forward visibility over the crest is adequate for vehicles travelling at the
posted speed, speeding vehicles will present a hazard. Administration considers
that there is a need to improve traffic safety for these two roads and
recommends that projects for traffic management along Lagoon Drive and Brazier
Road be listed in the City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program and be
considered by Council when developing the 2012/13 Capital Works Budget.
Concept plans for the proposed traffic treatments on Lagoon
Drive and Brazier Road are shown in Attachments 2, 3 and 4. The
proposal shows a redevelopment of Lagoon Drive similar to that of the newer
section of Lagoon Drive, south of Foreshore Vista, with a central planted
median, and roundabouts at the intersection of Brazier Road and St Ives
Drive. Similarly, for Brazier Road between Lagoon Drive and Compass
Circle a median is proposed to be installed. Between Compass Circle and
Wilkie Road, Brazier Road has a reduced width of 7m and it is proposed that
speed cushions be installed to reduce speed through this undulating section.
The residents of Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road will be consulted regarding the
traffic management proposed in these two roads.
It is recommended that the WA Police be approached to
increase speed enforcement in the area to improve speed compliance for the
minority of drivers travelling above the default urban speed limit of 50km/h.
In response to recent advice regarding the availability of
funds from the 2011/2012 Anti Hoon Program, it is proposed to make an
application to MRWA for the installation of speed cushions on Brazier Road,
between Compass Circle and Wilkie Road. The installation of these speed
cushions will be subject to the community’s agreement of the proposal.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
The City’s Traffic Investigation and Intervention
Policy is applicable to the assessment of the need for traffic treatments along
Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road.
Financial
Implications
The indicative cost of the proposed traffic treatments on
Lagoon Drive are $180,000 for each roundabout and $100,000 for landscaped
median works. For Brazier Road the estimated cost is $60,000 for median
works and $12,000 for speed cushions.
Should the City be successful with its application for
funding of the speed cushions for Brazier Road as part of the 2011/2012 Anti
Hoon Program, the City’s contribution can be made from Project No
PR-1948, Traffic Treatments - Various.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES
public consultation
with the residents of Lagoon Drive regarding support for the
installation of traffic management treatments as shown in City Drawings
2725-1-0 (Attachment 2) and 2725-2-0 (Attachment 3);
2. ENDORSES
public consultation with the residents of Brazier Road regarding support for
the installation of traffic management treatments as shown in City Drawings
2725-2-0 (Attachment 3) and 2724-1-0 (Attachment 4);
3. LISTS
for consideration $180,000 for the construction of a roundabout at the
intersection of Lagoon Drive/Brazier Road, Yanchep, as shown in City Drawing
2725-2-0 (Attachment 3), in the City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program
2012/13 – 2021/22;
4. LISTS
for consideration $180,000 for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection
of Lagoon Drive/St Ives Drive, Yanchep, as shown in City Drawing 2725-1-0
(Attachment 2), in the City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program 2012/13
– 2021/22);
5. LISTS
for consideration $100,000 for the construction of landscaped median traffic
treatments on Lagoon Drive, Yanchep, as shown in City Drawings 2725-1-0
(Attachment 2) and 2725-2-0 (Attachment 3), in the City’s 10-Year Capital
Works Program 2012/13 – 2021/22;
6. LISTS
for consideration $60,000 for the construction of landscaped median traffic
treatments on Brazier Road, Yanchep, as shown in City Drawing 2725-2-0
(Attachment 3), in the City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program 2012/2013
– 2021/2022;
7. APPROVES
the submission of an application for a funding allocation of $8,000 from Main
Roads WA’s 2011/2012 Anti Hoon Program towards the cost of installing
speed cushions on Brazier Road between Compass Circle and Wilkie Road;
8. LISTS
for consideration $12,000 for the installation of speed cushions on Brazier
Road, Yanchep, as shown in City Drawing 2724-1-0 (Attachment 4), in the
City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program 2012/2013 – 2021/2022, should
the City be unsuccessful with its application for funding as per Recommendation
7 above;
9. REQUESTS
the WA Police to undertake speed enforcement of vehicles using Lagoon Drive and
Brazier Road; and
10. ADVISES
the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
PT03-06/11 Lagoon Drive and Brazier Road, Yanchep -
Location Map
|
11/131428
|
|
|
2.
|
Lagoon Drive, Yanchep - Traffic Treatment Concept 2725-1-0
|
11/131549
|
|
|
3.
|
Lagoon Drive, Yanchep - Traffic Treatment Concept
2725-2-0
|
11/131551
|
|
|
4.
|
Brazier Road, Yanchep - Traffic Treatment Concept
2724-1-0
|
11/131553
|
|
IN06-12/11 Parking
Prohibition - Abbeville Circle - Mindarie Primary School, Mindarie
File Ref: 5597
– 11/128950
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the provision of parking prohibitions on the
north east bend of Abbeville Circle near Mindarie Primary School, Mindarie.
Background
The City has received a representation from a resident
concerning parents of Mindarie Primary School students parking on and around
the bend of Abbeville Circle at the north east corner of the school, creating
an obstruction to safe sight distance and generating safety issues for children
at the pedestrian crossing point.
Detail
Rothesay Heights and Abbeville Circle are the bordering
roads of Mindarie Primary School, Rothesay Heights to the west; Abbeville
Circle to the north and east whilst Abbeville Park is the adjoining property on
the south side of the school.
Embayed car parking spaces are provided on Abbeville Circle
adjacent to the school frontage and within Abbeville Park. A pedestrian
crossing is located on Abbeville Circle near the north east corner, opposite
Rainham Avenue. Bollards are installed on the boundaries of Abbeville Park and
on the verge either side of the pedestrian crossing to prevent vehicle access.
Parents have been observed parking on the road along the bend restricting
visibility for pedestrians trying to cross the road at the pedestrian crossing
and restricting the road to one lane causing congestion. Refer Attachment 1 for
location plan.
To ensure traffic safety, Administration has developed
parking prohibitions for Abberville Circle as per of the City of Wanneroo
Drawing No. 2677-1-1 (Attachment 2 refers).
Consultation
The proposed parking prohibition was discussed with the
reporting resident. The proposed prohibition does not impact on any
private residences, being only on the school side of the road.
Comment
Administration is of the view that the proposed parking
prohibitions are warranted to ensure proper sight distance and maintain
pedestrian safety.
The parking prohibitions also include yellow “No
Stopping” lines at the bend to better indicate the restriction to parking
in the area. It is considered that the additional visual aid on the pavement
will reduce confusion and better aid traffic flow and parking compliance.
It should be noted that the proposed parking prohibitions
will add an additional work commitment for the City’s Parking and
Compliance Officers to ensure compliance and as a consequence, will only be
able to be enforced on an infrequent basis.
Statutory
Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow
the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities
Local Law 2003 (as amended).
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to
improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The provision of parking prohibitions incurs not only the
initial cost of materials and installation of the signs but also the ongoing
cost of maintenance due to vandalism and graffiti. The cost to install signs
and line marking proposed in this prohibition is estimated to be $600 and is
able to be funded from PR-1431 - Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking
Upgrade Project, for which a total of $10,000 has been approved in the
2011/2012 Capital Works Budget.
It is noted that the enforcement of parking prohibitions
over an increasing number of sites across the City’s jurisdiction will
also impact on the resource availability of the City’s Parking Compliance
Officers to enforce all such prohibitions throughout the City.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the installation of “NO STOPPING ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” signs at the
north east bend of Abbeville Circle as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No
2677-1-1 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. APPROVES
the installation of Yellow No Stopping line marking at the north east bend of
Abbeville Circle as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No 2677-1-1 (Attachment 2
refers), and;
3. ADVISES
the resident and Mindarie Primary School of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Location map of Mindarie Primary School
|
11/128845
|
|
|
2.
|
Mindarie Primary School - Parking Prohibition drawing
- Abbeville Circle - 2447-1-2
|
11/128849
|
Minuted
|
Community Development
Communication and Events
CD01-12/11 Request
to Sponsor West Coast Employee of the Year Award 2012
File Ref: 3986
– 11/131295
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community Development
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider a request to sponsor the West Coast Institute of
Training (WCIT) Employee of the Year Award 2012.
Background
Each year, West Coast Institute of Training holds an awards
evening to recognise and celebrate students and lecturers achieving excellence
is their chosen fields.
“Council at its meeting
of 8 March 2011 endorsed the following:
1. APPROVES
the request to sponsor West Coast Institute of Training Innovation Award at a
cost of $2,000 from Community Funding and Donations Account 717633-1205-316;
2. NOMINATES
two people to attend the Awards Evening function on Monday 4
April 2011; and
3. NOTES
the Communications and Events operating budget for 2011/12 will be increased to
include a sponsorship account.”
Detail
West Coast Institute of Training has proposed that the City
this year consider being naming rights sponsor of the West Coast Employee of
the Year Award which, through a detailed selection process, is awarded to a
West Coast staff member who has found innovative ways to deliver training or
services. The cost of this sponsorship is $2,500.
Benefits of the naming rights sponsorship include:
· Exclusive
naming rights to the Employee of the Year Award.
· A
visual profile piece on screen which includes new photographs taken by
WCIT’s photographer.
· Verbal
acknowledgement at the beginning and end of the Awards Evening presentations.
· City
logo featured on pre-drinks function signage.
· Two
complimentary tickets to attend the Awards Evening Gala Dinner and present the
award on stage.
· City
name, logo and description to feature in the program.
· A
visual profile piece on screen to feature your company.
· Acknowledgement
in all Awards Evening media releases and West Coast Institute's Stakeholder
newsletter.
· Recognition
on West Coast Institute's website with a hyperlink to the City’s website.
· City
name and logo in a post-event community advertisement congratulating the award
winners.
· Photos
with and access to award winner for the City’s own promotional
activities.
· City
name and logo to display on college LCD screens for a period of one month after
the event.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is considered that there is potential for future
partnership opportunities between the City and West Coast Institute of Training
and this sponsorship request would be a great way to continue this important
stakeholder relationship. However, it is difficult to justify the sponsorship
of an employee from another organisation when the City’s staff are making
positive differences to our work practices and introducing innovations. It is
recommended that the Council does not accept the sponsorship request and seeks
an opportunity in 2012/13 to sponsor a student/trainee or an innovation that
benefits the City of Wanneroo community.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“4 Governance
4.1 Improve
strategic partnerships”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
A sponsorship account in support
of this annual request was endorsed during the 2011/12 budget deliberation and
funds are available from the Community Funding and Donations Account
717633-1205-316 should Council decide to approve this sponsorship request.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES
NOT APPROVE the request to sponsor West Coast Institute of Training Employee of
the Year Award at a cost of $2,500; and
2. SUPPORTS
Administration discussing with West Coast Institute of Training other
sponsorship opportunities for student/ trainees or innovations which benefit
the City of Wanneroo community.
Attachments: Nil
Other Matters
CD02-12/11 Australian
Government: Regional Development Australia Fund - Round Two - Yanchep Active
Open Space Playing Fields and Sports Amenities
File Ref: 6712
– 11/130551
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community Development
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To seek endorsement of an
application to the Federal Government’s Regional Development Australia
Fund for the construction of the Yanchep Open Space for a grant allocation
amount of $2,600,000.
Background
On 3 November 2011 the
Australian Government Department of Regional Australia, Regional Development
and Local Government announced that it was making available $200 million for
round two of the $1 billion Regional Development Australia Fund (RDAF).
The funding is to support the infrastructure needs of Regional Australia.
Under round one of the
RDAF, 35 projects were funded to the value of $150 million. The City of
Wanneroo applied in round one for the redevelopment of Girrawheen library but
was unsuccessful. Whilst the City of Wanneroo addressed the focus area of
education and training:
“the
[Regional Development Australia (RDA)]committee did not see a direct
alignment with the intent of the Strategies and Actions of the focus area
outlined in the RDA Perth Regional Plan”
For Round two, eligible
projects are required to be:
· ‘Investment
ready” within six months of execution of the funding agreement, including
construction.
· Capital
in nature such as new infrastructure and upgrades to existing infrastructure;
· Be
cohesive and not involve two or more different projects artificially drawn
together to create the impression of one project under a common name.
Applications will be assessed through a competitive two
stage application process. The first stage is the submission of an
Expression of Interest (EOI) form together with supporting documentation.
The EOI is due and is required to be submitted electronically by email to both
the RDA committee and to the Department of Regional Australia no later than
5.00pm WST on Thursday, 1 December 2011.
Detail
RDAF $200 million
funding (Round two)
Applicants can apply from $500,000 up to $15 million (GST
exclusive) for one project only. At least 50 per cent of the
partnership funding must be cash.
RDA committees will consider all EOIs from their region and
select three viable priority projects to proceed to full application and
assessment.
Notification of the EOI process is Wednesday 11 January
2012. Councils are required to enter an agreement with the Commonwealth
by Wednesday 15 February 2012. The funds must be expended by 30 June
2015.
Project Eligibility
Funding will not be available for:
· Soft
infrastructure, such as computer software or hardware; or the payment of
salaries for service delivery staff/, research staff and/or contractors;
· The
purchase of plant and equipment that is not an integral part of the funded
capital project;
· Administrative
overhead items, including office equipment and vehicles, mobile capital
equipment such as trucks and earthmoving equipment; or the provision of
services and support activities;
· Commercial
projects or components of projects that can be either on-sold or otherwise
granted to a commercial or business organisation;
· Activities
that are directly and primarily supported by other Australian Government
programs, including major roads and highways, bridges, schools (provate and
public), and construction, upgrade or extensions to hospitals. Exceptions
to this may be:
o Large
transport hubs which facilitate the movement of freights and passengers within,
around or across a region, thus supporting local industry and enhancing
productivity; and
o Minor
roads, access corridors or access drives which lead to an area of common use or
common benefit, including industrial estate or a social or economic facility
which supports economic diversity, social inclusion or environmental
sustainability;
· Projects
that are eligible to be funded under the National disaster relief and Recovery
Arrangements in the calendar year of lodgement; and
· Projects
that are the normal responsibility of local governments, including
upgrades to or refurbishment of sewerage systems, water pipes and storm water
drains; the construction of public amenity blocks; minor upgrades to a town
centre, or the construction or refurbishment of Council offices.
Application Assessment
The main criterion for
assessment is as follows:
· Be
‘investment ready” within six months of execution of the funding
agreement;
· Be
capital in nature;
· Scheduled
to finish on or before 30 June 2015;
· Must
be nominated by the RDA committee to submit an application;
· Must
be viable and sustainable;
· Provide
ALL mandatory documentation;
The RDA committee will
base its assessment on:
· Priorities
in the Regional Plan;
· Capacity
of the project to address in the region, with consideration of the geographical
spread of projects;
· Impact
of the project on the region and neighbouring regions, with endorsed projects
coming from across the region, rather than any one town, locality or Local
Government Area;
· Level
of community support; and
· Readiness
to proceed.
Contracting and
Funding
The RDA will advise both the applicant and the Department of
the three projects that will proceed to the second stage of the application
process (full application). The full application is due and is required
to be submitted electronically by email to both the RDA committee and to the
Department of Regional Australia no later than Wednesday 15 February 2012.
Successful applicants of stage two of the application
process will be required to enter a Funding Agreement to be signed by both
parties. The Minister is expected to make an announcement on successful
projects in May 2012.
Successful applicants will be required to report at
different stages (agreed milestones) as stipulated in the Funding Agreement and
site visits may be conducted. An initial payment will be made, with
remaining payments made on achievement of agreed milestones. Construction
of the project must be completed no later than 30 June 2015.
Consultation
The sporting clubs in the Yanchep/ Two Rocks area were
consulted on Monday 3 May, 2010 at a meeting facilitated by the Yanchep Two
Rocks Recreation Association. The Yanchep and Two Rocks sporting groups
are supportive of the new playing fields and sports amenities and will be
consulted further as part of the development of the final design drawings.
Comment
The following project is recommended for consideration under
this funding program:
Yanchep Active Open Space
Playing Fields and Sports Amenities
Upon completion of the earthworks stage of the
“Yanchep Active Open Space” by Yanchep Beach Joint Venture (YBJV),
it is proposed to implement the project involving:
· Provision
for a District Sporting Facility that provides for Australian Rules Football,
Soccer, Little Athletics, Cricket, Baseball/Softball, Rugby Union and League,
Netball, Basketball and Passive Recreation.
· Provision
of irrigation infrastructure including mainline, detailed irrigation lines,
sprinklers, sensors and related items.
· Landscaping,
including the turfing of the sporting ovals, and treatment of earthworks
batters
· Provision
of shared pathways and walkways
· Provision
of floodlighting
· Provision
for Carparking facilities to cater for 180 to 200 formal parking bays.
· Amenities
building (first stage) to include change rooms, toilets, umpires/first aid room
and a kiosk.
The underlying purpose of the open space is to provide a
design that will accommodate the current sporting needs and requirements of the
community in the Yanchep/Two Rocks and provide for future growth that is
anticipated within the area.
The
estimated costs for the construction of the project is summarised below:
· Preliminaries $
107,000
· Professional
Fees $
260,000
· Earthworks
and soil preparation $
263,000
· Irrigation $
424,000
· Turfing $
522,000
· Landscaping
& Carpark $
944,000
· Amenities $2,680,000
_________
Total: $5,200,000
YBJV proposes to construct between February and August 2012,
the irrigation bore, earthworks for the whole site and the access road to the
site in accordance with the Deed of Agreement with the City (subject to another
report on the agenda).
During this period, Administration will prepare the design
and documentation for the playing fields and landscaping components of the
project to enable these works to proceed on completion of the earthworks. This
will ensure compliance with the requirement to be investment ready within six
months of execution of the funding agreement, including construction.
Statutory
Compliance
The City will need to
adhere to the requirements of a Federal Funding Agreement for successful
applications.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation; and
4. Governance
4.4 Maintain
long-term financial stability”.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Playing Fields and
Amenities Building Stage 1
Funding has been
allocation in the 10 year Capital Works Program for the construction of the
Yanchep Open Space as follows:
Playing Fields 2011/12 $1,000,000
(Loan Funds)
2012/13 $1,400,000
(Loans Funds $1,000,000
Municipal
$
340,000
Grants $
60,000)
_________
Sub Total (1) $2,400,000
Amenities Building 2011/12 $
240,000 (Municipal)
$2,400,000
(Municipal $1,101,417
Grants $
770,333
Loan
$ 619,250)
_________
Sub Total (2) $2,680,000
_________
TOTAL $5,080,000
Should the City be successful with its application for 50%
of the funding for the project, then the 10 Year Capital Works will need to be
adjusted to reflect the grant from the Federal Government and the deletion of
the Council funds allocated towards this project.
Given that the works proposed to be undertaken as part of
this project will be predominantly or entirely funded by the collection of
developer contributions from the proposed Yanchep Two Rocks Development
Contribution Plan, the amount of any grant funding received (either in part or
whole) will be deducted from the quantum of development costs under that Plan,
thereby reducing the amount of development contributions to be paid and, in
turn, further reducing any impact of developer contributions on housing affordability
in future.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the submission by
Administration of the Yanchep Active Open Space Playing Fields of Sports
Amenities project for a funding grant of $2,600,000 from the Regional Australia
Development Fund (RDAF).
Attachments: Nil
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Finance
CS01-12/11 Warrant
of Payment for the Period to 30 November 2011
File Ref: 2374
– 11/136146
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for
the month of November 2011, including a statement as to the total amounts
outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list
of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary
Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts
and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of
accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the
minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in November
2011
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
85271 - 85674
1400 - 1417
|
$1,337,979.43
$13,252,148.98
$14,590,128.41
($1,686.70)
($8,859.04)
($14,579,582.67)
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Direct Payment – Advance Recoup
Direct Payment – Bank Fees/Credit Cards
Direct Payment - Payroll
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$14,579,582.67
$26,682.15
$3,977,376.24
$18,583,641.06
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Cell 1
Cell 4
Cell 8
Cell 9
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$3,641.37
$1,717.67
$8,859.04
|
At the close of November 2011 outstanding creditors amounted
to $1,618,293.95.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payments (cheques and electronic transfers) and
the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of November 2011
is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the
meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management)
Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the
accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end
and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after
each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the
prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006–2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the
month of November 2011, as summarised below:-
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
85271 - 85674
1400 - 1417
|
$1,337,979.43
$13,252,148.98
$14,590,128.41
($1,686.70)
($8,859.04)
($14,579,582.67)
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Direct Payment – Advance Recoup
Direct Payment – Bank Fees/Credit Cards
Direct Payment - Payroll
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$14,579,582.67
$26,682.15
$3,977,376.24
$18,583,641.06
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – November 2011
Cell 1
Cell 4
Cell 8
Cell 9
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$3,641.37
$1,717.67
$8,859.04
|
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS
NOVEMBER 2011
|
|
PAYMENT
|
DATE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
AMOUNT
|
|
00085271
|
27/10/2011
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$3,400.00
|
|
|
|
IT and
Communication Allowance
|
|
|
00085272
|
27/10/2011
|
Cr D Newton
|
$3,400.00
|
|
|
|
IT and
Communication Allowance
|
|
|
00085273
|
01/11/2011
|
In Residence
|
$732.95
|
|
|
|
Building
Application Refund - Duplication
|
|
|
00085274
|
01/11/2011
|
Robert Palmer
|
$24.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
Cancelled Jet Boating & Laser Clay Pigeon Shooting
|
|
|
00085275
|
01/11/2011
|
K Pittard
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
Laser Clay Pigeon Shooting Program Was Cancelled
|
|
|
00085276
|
01/11/2011
|
W Walker
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund Cancelled
Program - Jet Boating
|
|
|
00085277
|
01/11/2011
|
D Searle
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
Laser Clay Pigeon Shooting Program Was Cancelled
|
|
|
00085278
|
01/11/2011
|
K Omar
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085279
|
01/11/2011
|
J Parmar
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085280
|
01/11/2011
|
Brightwater Care Group
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085281
|
01/11/2011
|
Emmanuel Baptist Church
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085282
|
01/11/2011
|
V Prajapati
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085283
|
01/11/2011
|
J Duffy
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085284
|
01/11/2011
|
Total Body Nutrition
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085285
|
01/11/2011
|
Gymnastics WA
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For C Peoples - 2011 National Championships Sport Aerobics And Aero -
Victoria From 6-10 October 2011
|
|
|
00085286
|
01/11/2011
|
Wann-Gara Inner Wheel
|
$175.00
|
|
|
|
Donation
Towards Hosting An International Friendship Night At The Gallery - 6 October
2011
|
|
|
00085287
|
01/11/2011
|
I60 Community Services
|
$189.30
|
|
|
|
Donation
Towards A 50% Waiver Of Fees For Bin Hire At The Brighton Moonlight Markets
To Be Held On 7 October, 4 November & 2 December 2011
|
|
|
00085288
|
01/11/2011
|
Kingsway United Christian Soccer Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For M Johnston - U16 Girls National Christian Football Competition -
Newcastle NSW 24-28 September 2011
|
|
|
00085289
|
01/11/2011
|
AJS Motorcycle Club (Wanneroo)
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For M And L Clarke - 2011 Australian Moto-Trials Championship - SA 2-3
October 2011
|
|
|
00085290
|
01/11/2011
|
NRG Cheersports Inc
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For A And J Gordon - Auscheer Australian Grand - NSW 24-25 September 2011
|
|
|
00085291
|
01/11/2011
|
Equestrian WA
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
D Buktenica - WA Interschool Eventing National Championship - Victoria 3-6
October 2011
|
|
|
00085292
|
01/11/2011
|
Football West
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For J Driscoll - 2011 FFA National Junior Championships - NSW 2-7 October
2011
|
|
|
00085293
|
01/11/2011
|
Kingsway Christian College
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For G Natchett - French Exchange Program - Nice And Paris France - 30
September To 16 October 2011
|
|
|
00085294
|
01/11/2011
|
Ocean Reef Caravan Park
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085295
|
01/11/2011
|
Professionals Executive Coastal
|
$217.80
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085296
|
01/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$366.66
|
|
00085297
|
01/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$579.16
|
|
00085298
|
01/11/2011
|
A Patel
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085299
|
01/11/2011
|
H Huynh
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085300
|
01/11/2011
|
Yanchep District High School
|
$5,700.00
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary
Of The 2011 City Of Wanneroo Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
00085301
|
01/11/2011
|
Wanneroo Senior High School
|
$5,700.00
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary
Of The 2011 City Of Wanneroo Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
00085302
|
01/11/2011
|
Mindarie Senior College
|
$5,700.00
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary
Of The 2011 City Of Wanneroo Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
00085303
|
01/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Senior High School
|
$5,700.00
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary
Of The 2011 City Of Wanneroo Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
00085304
|
01/11/2011
|
Clarkson Community High School
|
$5,700.00
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary
Of The 2011 City Of Wanneroo Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
00085305
|
01/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$229.82
|
|
00085306
|
01/11/2011
|
Maria Brewster
|
$123.20
|
|
|
|
Refund
For Term 4 Tuesday Evening Pottery Classes
|
|
|
00085307
|
01/11/2011
|
Nigel Jones
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00085308
|
01/11/2011
|
N Batley
|
$38.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00085309
|
01/11/2011
|
C Jamieson
|
$19.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00085310
|
01/11/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$60.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085311
|
01/11/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$728.80
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance ($714.40)
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
00085312
|
01/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$46.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085313
|
01/11/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$271.50
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085314
|
01/11/2011
|
Landgate
|
$18,827.18
|
|
|
|
GRV
Int Vals Metro Shared And FESA 01.10.2011-14.10.2011 - Rates
|
|
|
00085315
|
01/11/2011
|
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash
|
$105.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085316
|
01/11/2011
|
Synergy
|
$7,381.40
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
3 x Financial
Assistance ($541.95)
|
|
|
00085317
|
01/11/2011
|
Telstra
|
$12,531.91
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges
For The City July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance ($300.00)
|
|
|
00085318
|
01/11/2011
|
Janice Lewis
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Payment - Quinns Rocks Adult Day Centre
|
|
|
00085319
|
01/11/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$235.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085320
|
01/11/2011
|
Building & Health Petty Cash
|
$163.80
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085321
|
01/11/2011
|
Rotary Club of Wanneroo
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Rotary
Club Of Wanneroo - 40th Birthday Dinner Table Of 10 People - Governance
|
|
|
00085322
|
01/11/2011
|
Western Australian Planning Commission
|
$1,603.00
|
|
|
|
Application
Fee - Lot 51 Mary Street Subdivision & Amalgamation
|
|
|
00085323
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$721.64
|
|
00085324
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$327.45
|
|
00085325
|
08/11/2011
|
Bayonet Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Not Required
|
|
|
00085326
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$711.18
|
|
00085327
|
08/11/2011
|
Manor Home Builders
|
$2,761.85
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Overpaid In Error
|
|
|
00085328
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$637.97
|
|
00085329
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$301.17
|
|
00085330
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$301.43
|
|
00085331
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$288.81
|
|
00085332
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$299.42
|
|
00085333
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$305.62
|
|
00085334
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$763.48
|
|
00085335
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$732.10
|
|
00085336
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$541.30
|
|
00085337
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$836.69
|
|
00085338
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$300.43
|
|
00085339
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$292.52
|
|
00085340
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$606.60
|
|
00085341
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$700.72
|
|
00085342
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$253.76
|
|
00085343
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$222.75
|
|
00085344
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$310.06
|
|
00085345
|
08/11/2011
|
A Patel
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085346
|
08/11/2011
|
Lions Club of Girradoola Inc
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085347
|
08/11/2011
|
G Beaumont
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085348
|
08/11/2011
|
K Howard
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085349
|
08/11/2011
|
M Napoli
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085350
|
08/11/2011
|
Karen Frances Cappiello
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085351
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$220.88
|
|
00085352
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$187.69
|
|
00085353
|
08/11/2011
|
Department of Housing
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085354
|
08/11/2011
|
S Shirlow
|
$120.60
|
|
|
|
Refund Swim
Lesson - Enrolment Error
|
|
|
00085355
|
08/11/2011
|
G Munro
|
$85.76
|
|
|
|
Refund
Swim Lesson - Moving To Victoria
|
|
|
00085356
|
08/11/2011
|
E Collins
|
$149.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Boot Camp Fees - Program Was Cancelled
|
|
|
00085357
|
08/11/2011
|
M Park
|
$12.15
|
|
|
|
Refund Zumba
Class Cancelled
|
|
|
00085358
|
08/11/2011
|
N Lucas
|
$230.86
|
|
|
|
Refund For
Personal Training Sessions
|
|
|
00085359
|
08/11/2011
|
K & P S Lee
|
$750.00
|
|
|
|
Race
In Your Rates Winner - Rates Back For 2011/12
|
|
|
00085360
|
08/11/2011
|
R & S M Lee
|
$750.00
|
|
|
|
Race
In Your Rates Winner - Rates Back For 2011/12
|
|
|
00085361
|
08/11/2011
|
G E & H G Hicks
|
$1,500.00
|
|
|
|
Race
In Your Rates Winner - Rates Back For 2011/12
|
|
|
00085362
|
08/11/2011
|
Eloisa Del Pino
|
$1,422.35
|
|
|
|
Race
In Your Rates Winner - Rates Back For 2011/12
|
|
|
00085363
|
08/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$15.00
|
|
00085364
|
08/11/2011
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd
|
$631.34
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - DA Not Required
|
|
|
00085365
|
08/11/2011
|
A D'Amore Total Body Nutrition
|
$33.38
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Hire
Fees
|
|
|
00085366
|
08/11/2011
|
L Roper
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085367
|
08/11/2011
|
Paws at Play Daycare Centre
|
$44.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Exhibitor Provide Us With A Prize Over The Minimum Sponsor Contribution For
The Dog's Breakfast Event
|
|
|
00085368
|
08/11/2011
|
R Sward
|
$9.05
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Overpayment
|
|
|
00085369
|
08/11/2011
|
H Sookloll
|
$18.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Overpayment
|
|
|
00085370
|
08/11/2011
|
Rene Henry
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085371
|
08/11/2011
|
Darren Overall
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
For Codes Variation Fee Which Was Not Required Ba11/2925
|
|
|
00085372
|
08/11/2011
|
Ingrid Bell
|
$18.10
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund
|
|
|
00085373
|
08/11/2011
|
Redink Homes Pty Ltd
|
$30.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
Overpayment On Building Application Fees
|
|
|
00085374
|
08/11/2011
|
Wallis Group Pty Ltd
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Septic Tank Application Fee - Application Cancelled
|
|
|
00085375
|
08/11/2011
|
Saraceni Corp Pty Ltd
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085376
|
08/11/2011
|
Professionals North Shore
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085377
|
08/11/2011
|
Lisa Murray
|
$263.84
|
|
|
|
Refund
For 9 X Personal Training Sessions
|
|
|
00085378
|
08/11/2011
|
Margaret Murry
|
$109.35
|
|
|
|
Refund
9 Visit Passes Due To Cancellation Of Zumba Classes
|
|
|
00085379
|
08/11/2011
|
Circus Joseph Ashton
|
$3,050.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085380
|
08/11/2011
|
Alex Easdon
|
$242.90
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Hire
Fees
|
|
|
00085381
|
08/11/2011
|
K Davis
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085382
|
08/11/2011
|
Alinjarra Primary School
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085383
|
08/11/2011
|
M Quinton
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085384
|
08/11/2011
|
Ray White Sun City
|
$365.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085385
|
08/11/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$95.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085386
|
08/11/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$2,870.55
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance ($1114.15)
|
|
|
00085387
|
08/11/2011
|
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash
|
$184.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085388
|
08/11/2011
|
Austswim Wa
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
King
Neptune Conference - Wanneroo Aquamotion
|
|
|
00085389
|
08/11/2011
|
Fines Enforcement Registry
|
$1,118.00
|
|
|
|
Lodgement
Of 26 Infringement Records - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
00085390
|
08/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$44.50
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085391
|
08/11/2011
|
Optus
|
$87.19
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085392
|
08/11/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$113.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085393
|
08/11/2011
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$145.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085394
|
08/11/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$454.00
|
|
|
|
Meter
Repair Works 27 Gosford Meander Ashby - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Metered
Fire Hydrant Standpipe Hire November 2011 - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
00085395
|
08/11/2011
|
Yanchep Two Rocks Library Petty Cash
|
$30.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085396
|
08/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085397
|
08/11/2011
|
Synergy
|
$119,509.35
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
5 x Financial
Assistance ($932.25)
|
|
|
00085398
|
08/11/2011
|
Telstra
|
$352.61
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085399
|
08/11/2011
|
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance
Excess Claim: WN32334 - Insurance Services
|
|
|
00085400
|
08/11/2011
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$111.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085401
|
08/11/2011
|
Western Power
|
$15,687.00
|
|
|
|
New
Installation Commercial Supply - Rocca Way Wanneroo - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
00085402
|
08/11/2011
|
Kingsway Stadium Petty Cash
|
$108.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085403
|
08/11/2011
|
Hospitality Petty Cash
|
$481.20
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085404
|
15/11/2011
|
Purrfect Pet Doors
|
$44.00
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Refund - Exhibitor Provided Us With A Prize Over The Minimum Sponsor
Contribution For The Dog's Breakfast Event
|
|
|
00085405
|
15/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$345.12
|
|
00085406
|
15/11/2011
|
Naomi Olivier
|
$64.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Plan Fee Not Required - Poor Quality Copies
|
|
|
00085407
|
15/11/2011
|
Bounty Island Pty Ltd
|
$48,125.00
|
|
|
|
Security
Deposit Refund Lots 223-227 Willespie Drive Pearsall
|
|
|
00085408
|
15/11/2011
|
M Bedalov
|
$6.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Have A Go Day 09.10.2011 Client Cancelled
|
|
|
00085409
|
15/11/2011
|
M Head
|
$16.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Overpaid Account - Client No Longer Receives Services From City Of Wanneroo
|
|
|
00085410
|
15/11/2011
|
R Swayn
|
$33.80
|
|
|
|
Refund
Overpaid Account - Podiatry - Client No Longer Receives Services From City Of
Wanneroo
|
|
|
00085411
|
15/11/2011
|
David Evans Real Estate
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085412
|
15/11/2011
|
Ocean Reef Caravan Village
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085413
|
15/11/2011
|
Cafe Elixir
|
$442.45
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Overpayment Of Commercial Waste Account
|
|
|
00085414
|
15/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$769.59
|
|
00085415
|
15/11/2011
|
B Cooper
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085416
|
15/11/2011
|
R Jones & R Cashion
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085417
|
15/11/2011
|
W & H Vicencio
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085418
|
15/11/2011
|
A & I Campbell
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085419
|
15/11/2011
|
B Wolfe & J Tonkin
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085420
|
15/11/2011
|
P & E Boyd
|
$269.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085421
|
15/11/2011
|
B & D Kotur
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085422
|
15/11/2011
|
N Patel
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085423
|
15/11/2011
|
J Salter
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085424
|
15/11/2011
|
R P Smith
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085425
|
15/11/2011
|
V & T Delaney
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085426
|
15/11/2011
|
A Robson
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085427
|
15/11/2011
|
C & R Xavier
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085428
|
15/11/2011
|
K Akilan
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085429
|
15/11/2011
|
G Measey
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085430
|
15/11/2011
|
D Currie
|
$325.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085431
|
15/11/2011
|
D Day
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085432
|
15/11/2011
|
L & R Merk
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085433
|
15/11/2011
|
J & M Riggs PO Box 1446
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085434
|
15/11/2011
|
Ashmy Pty Ltd
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085435
|
15/11/2011
|
K Dellaway
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085436
|
15/11/2011
|
M J Tinsley
|
$33.80
|
|
|
|
Overpaid
Account
|
|
|
00085437
|
15/11/2011
|
G Garvey
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085438
|
15/11/2011
|
S Lindau
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085439
|
15/11/2011
|
M McKeand
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085440
|
15/11/2011
|
E Lewis
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085441
|
15/11/2011
|
R Sewell
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085442
|
15/11/2011
|
D Donis 6 Jacaranda Drive
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085443
|
15/11/2011
|
D Tierney
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085444
|
15/11/2011
|
M Thomas
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085445
|
15/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$104.11
|
|
00085446
|
15/11/2011
|
Syngenta
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085447
|
15/11/2011
|
K Mosley
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085448
|
15/11/2011
|
J Varacalli
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085449
|
15/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085450
|
15/11/2011
|
V Lakhani
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085451
|
15/11/2011
|
Nicholas James & Jenna James & Julie Groves
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085452
|
15/11/2011
|
Richard & Desma Mews
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085453
|
15/11/2011
|
Koondoola Ratepayers & Tenants Action Group
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding Girradoola Going Places Community Christmas Celebration
|
|
|
00085454
|
15/11/2011
|
Satterley Property Group
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085455
|
15/11/2011
|
Dawn Searle
|
$15.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Jetboating 26/10/11 Program Cancelled
|
|
|
00085456
|
15/11/2011
|
Brenda Thomas
|
$12.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Have A Go Day 09.11.11 Program Cancelled Includes Refund For Alan Thomas
|
|
|
00085457
|
15/11/2011
|
Doreen Holland
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Fishing 16.11.11 Client Cancelled
|
|
|
00085458
|
15/11/2011
|
Mary Ann Nobbs
|
$6.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Have A Go Day 09.11.11 Client Cancelled
|
|
|
00085459
|
15/11/2011
|
Irene Swerdlow
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Laser Clay Pigeon Shooting 02.11.11 Cancelled Program
|
|
|
00085460
|
15/11/2011
|
Brian Little
|
$12.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Have A Go Day 09.11.11 Client Cancelled (Includes Refund For P Little)
|
|
|
00085461
|
15/11/2011
|
Yiu Wong
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilized
|
|
|
00085462
|
15/11/2011
|
Brian Fielding
|
$12.50
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00085463
|
15/11/2011
|
Neil Mansfield
|
$37.50
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Overpaid
|
|
|
00085464
|
15/11/2011
|
Neil Mansfield
|
$9.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Overpaid
|
|
|
00085465
|
15/11/2011
|
Richard Matthews
|
$15.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Jetboating 26.10.11 Cancelled Program
|
|
|
00085466
|
15/11/2011
|
Thomas Sefton
|
$16.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Overpaid Account No Longer Receives Services From Cow
|
|
|
00085467
|
15/11/2011
|
Claudia Guggisberg
|
$12.90
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Swim Lesson Due To Hydrotherapy Pool Maintenance
|
|
|
00085468
|
15/11/2011
|
Mikala Pougnault
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Facility
Bond Hire
|
|
|
00085469
|
15/11/2011
|
S Tsalis
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085470
|
15/11/2011
|
Marni George
|
$85.76
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Swim
Lessons Term 4 2011
|
|
|
00085471
|
15/11/2011
|
Andrea Cusack
|
$22.45
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Credit Voucher For Missed Lesson 29.08.11 Term 3 2011
|
|
|
00085472
|
15/11/2011
|
Jo Waterman
|
$108.45
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Swim Lesson Fee For E Waterman Enrolled Into Level 6 In Error &
Paid For 2 Lessons
|
|
|
00085473
|
15/11/2011
|
Cathryn Sonneman-Smith
|
$168.12
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Swim
Lessons Term 4 2011
|
|
|
00085474
|
15/11/2011
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$170.00
|
|
|
|
Cash
Advance For Photo Album For Carers Weekend Away - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Advance For Chris Hunt Farewell Afternoon Tea
|
|
|
00085475
|
15/11/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$45.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085476
|
15/11/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$46.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085477
|
15/11/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$3,060.80
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
5 x Financial
Assistance ($942.70)
|
|
|
00085478
|
15/11/2011
|
AMP Flexible Lifetime Super Fund
|
$2,089.11
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085479
|
15/11/2011
|
Construction Training Fund
|
$47,528.89
|
|
|
|
Construction
Levy Payments 01.10.2011-31.10.2011
|
|
|
00085480
|
15/11/2011
|
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$114.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085481
|
15/11/2011
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
00085482
|
15/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$35.10
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085483
|
15/11/2011
|
Mr Evan Martin
|
$249.00
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
00085484
|
15/11/2011
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$148.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085485
|
15/11/2011
|
Landgate
|
$34.00
|
|
|
|
Mining Tenements
Chargeable - Rates
|
|
|
00085486
|
15/11/2011
|
Zurich Client Service
|
$404.27
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085487
|
15/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085488
|
15/11/2011
|
Synergy
|
$362,920.40
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Streetlight
Tariff 24.09.2011-24.10.2011
|
|
|
|
|
9 x
Financial Assistance ($1,538.85)
|
|
|
00085489
|
15/11/2011
|
Telstra
|
$500.32
|
|
|
|
2 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085490
|
15/11/2011
|
Mrs Jennifer Martin
|
$213.00
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00085491
|
15/11/2011
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington
|
$203.30
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00085492
|
15/11/2011
|
Navigator Applications Account
|
$155.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085493
|
15/11/2011
|
Hostplus Superannuation Fund
|
$1,131.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085494
|
15/11/2011
|
Australian Super
|
$5,116.81
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085495
|
15/11/2011
|
MLC Nominees Pty Limited
|
$1,113.73
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085496
|
15/11/2011
|
The Industry Superannuation Fund
|
$366.48
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085497
|
15/11/2011
|
Integra Super
|
$570.36
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085498
|
15/11/2011
|
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund
|
$51.30
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085499
|
15/11/2011
|
MTAA Superannuation Fund
|
$349.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085500
|
15/11/2011
|
Australiansuper
|
$2,756.48
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085501
|
15/11/2011
|
Rest Superannuation
|
$3,294.81
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085502
|
15/11/2011
|
Asgard Elements Super
|
$107.70
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085503
|
15/11/2011
|
Unisuper Limited
|
$760.26
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085504
|
15/11/2011
|
Hesta Super Fund
|
$1,615.79
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085505
|
15/11/2011
|
Colonial First State Firstchoice
|
$2,013.82
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085506
|
15/11/2011
|
Care Super
|
$319.29
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085507
|
15/11/2011
|
Spectrum Super
|
$756.67
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085508
|
15/11/2011
|
Media Super
|
$444.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085509
|
15/11/2011
|
BT Super For Life
|
$420.88
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085510
|
15/11/2011
|
Telstra Superannuation Scheme
|
$725.07
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085511
|
15/11/2011
|
Amist Super
|
$374.95
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085512
|
15/11/2011
|
Agest Administration
|
$117.21
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085513
|
15/11/2011
|
Valdor Superannuation Fund
|
$201.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085514
|
15/11/2011
|
Vision Super Pty Ltd
|
$411.52
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085515
|
15/11/2011
|
Recruitmentsuper
|
$745.26
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085516
|
15/11/2011
|
Macquarie Investment Management Ltd
|
$47.19
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085517
|
15/11/2011
|
Superwrap - Personal Super Plan
|
$100.22
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085518
|
15/11/2011
|
Ms Jodie Walter
|
$124.50
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
00085519
|
15/11/2011
|
Construction & Building Unions
|
$328.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085520
|
15/11/2011
|
Asteron Optimum - Suncorp Master Trust
|
$367.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085521
|
15/11/2011
|
Mr David Parsons
|
$99.90
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Battery For BBQ - Dalvik Park Merriwa
|
|
|
00085522
|
15/11/2011
|
Plum Superannuation Fund
|
$451.68
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085523
|
15/11/2011
|
Mr Gerald Savage
|
$49.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
00085524
|
15/11/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$1,204.00
|
|
|
|
Headwork
Contribution In Connection To Deep Sewer Of The Existing & Proposed
Facilities At Opportunity Playspace In Scenic Drive - Projects
|
|
|
00085525
|
15/11/2011
|
Gary Bowell Super Fund
|
$466.37
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085526
|
15/11/2011
|
Venetia Donnellan
|
$164.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00085527
|
15/11/2011
|
Perpetual Wealth Focus Super Plan
|
$342.52
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085528
|
15/11/2011
|
Statewide Superannuation Trust
|
$525.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085529
|
15/11/2011
|
OnePath Life Limited
|
$386.96
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085530
|
15/11/2011
|
Catholic Super
|
$321.33
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00085531
|
15/11/2011
|
Miss Celina York
|
$160.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Senior First Aid Course Fee For Swim Teaching In Hydrotherapy Pool
|
|
|
00085532
|
15/11/2011
|
Mrs Samantha Ingram
|
$199.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Senior First Aid Course Fee For Swim Teaching In Hydrotherapy Pool
|
|
|
00085533
|
15/11/2011
|
Miss Karis Chaplyn
|
$160.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Senior First Aid Course Fee For Swim Teaching In Hydrotherapy Pool
|
|
|
00085534
|
15/11/2011
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
00085535
|
15/11/2011
|
Cr Dorothy Newton
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
00085536
|
25/11/2011
|
A Farmyard On Wheels
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Supply Of Farmyard On Wheels - Community Links
|
|
|
00085537
|
25/11/2011
|
Autospark Joondalup
|
$6,367.50
|
|
|
|
Blackvue Cameras - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
00085538
|
25/11/2011
|
Baker & Taylor
|
$2,647.12
|
|
|
|
Various Publications - Library Services
|
|
|
00085539
|
25/11/2011
|
Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$9,075.00
|
|
|
|
Kingsway Regional Playground Consultancy Fee - Facilities
|
|
|
00085540
|
25/11/2011
|
Brian Zucal & Associates
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Compensation Meeting For 8 Becher Way Gnangara - Property
|
|
|
00085541
|
25/11/2011
|
CBC Australia Pty Ltd
|
$652.53
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
00085542
|
25/11/2011
|
City of Armadale
|
$88.00
|
|
|
|
Book Purchase - Heritage
|
|
|
00085543
|
25/11/2011
|
City of Perth
|
$70.00
|
|
|
|
Rethink - Reinvent - Rejuvenate Workshop - Community
Links
|
|
|
00085544
|
25/11/2011
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd
|
$71,940.00
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Skid Steer - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
00085545
|
25/11/2011
|
Cloverdale Hardware
|
$46.75
|
|
|
|
Repaired Lead/Switch To Kango - Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
00085546
|
25/11/2011
|
Coles Group Ltd
|
$1,214.85
|
|
|
|
Gift Cards - Corporate Strategy & Performance - HR
|
|
|
00085547
|
25/11/2011
|
Diana Walters
|
$310.00
|
|
|
|
Christmas Concert 06 &15.12.2011 - Funded Services
|
|
|
00085548
|
25/11/2011
|
Freehills
|
$7,422.12
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Appeal - HR
|
|
|
00085549
|
25/11/2011
|
G & S Maintenance
|
$1,480.00
|
|
|
|
Various Works For Waste Services
|
|
|
00085550
|
25/11/2011
|
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore
|
$1,561.98
|
|
|
|
Bar Fridge & Microwave For Elected Members Area
|
|
|
|
|
Olympus Cameras - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
00085551
|
25/11/2011
|
Perth Sewing Centre
|
$162.00
|
|
|
|
Service/Repair
Sewing Machine - Funded Services
|
|
|
00085552
|
25/11/2011
|
Probe Investments Pty Ltd
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Arcade
Game For Museum School Holiday Program
|
|
|
00085553
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085554
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085555
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085556
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085557
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085558
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085559
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085560
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled - Print Error
|
|
|
00085561
|
25/11/2011
|
Reliable Fencing
|
$5,841.00
|
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City
|
|
|
00085562
|
25/11/2011
|
Robert Double T/A Double Hire
|
$2,277.00
|
|
|
|
Shade Hire For Dogs Breakfast Event
|
|
|
00085563
|
25/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085564
|
25/11/2011
|
State Library of WA
|
$2,725.80
|
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges
|
|
|
00085565
|
25/11/2011
|
The Scenester Label
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
DJ For Staff Christmas Function 23.12.2011
|
|
|
00085566
|
25/11/2011
|
WA Limestone Company
|
$29,281.90
|
|
|
|
Road Materials For Various Project Locations
|
|
|
00085567
|
25/11/2011
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$364.23
|
|
|
|
Grocery Items For Various Departments
|
|
|
00085568
|
22/11/2011
|
M Boardman
|
$422.60
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Withdrawn
|
|
|
00085569
|
22/11/2011
|
DVD Fresh
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Not Required
|
|
|
00085570
|
22/11/2011
|
B Thomas
|
$19.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Fishing
Program Cancelled
|
|
|
00085571
|
22/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$5,403.52
|
|
00085572
|
22/11/2011
|
Linpark Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$2,646.10
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Portion Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment 107 To District Planning
Scheme No.2 (Lot 23 Emerald Drive Carabooda)
|
|
|
00085573
|
22/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$296.67
|
|
00085574
|
22/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$499.02
|
|
00085575
|
22/11/2011
|
Andrew Mark Kelley
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085576
|
22/11/2011
|
L M McLetchi & K Solomon
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085577
|
22/11/2011
|
Scott Hodgson
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085578
|
22/11/2011
|
Ashmy Pty Ltd
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085579
|
22/11/2011
|
L Rabac
|
$99.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Swim
Lesson
|
|
|
00085580
|
22/11/2011
|
Stanley Mining Service - International
|
$7,631.00
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Partial Refund
|
|
|
00085581
|
22/11/2011
|
Department of Housing
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085582
|
22/11/2011
|
Northern Corridor Developments Ltd
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Signage Bond
Refund
|
|
|
00085583
|
22/11/2011
|
Project 2000 Perth Inc
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085584
|
22/11/2011
|
A Punde
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085585
|
22/11/2011
|
E Green
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085586
|
22/11/2011
|
C Muga
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085587
|
22/11/2011
|
C Johnson
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085588
|
22/11/2011
|
Supa IGA Merriwa
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085589
|
22/11/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Playgroup
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085590
|
22/11/2011
|
R Russell-Brown
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085591
|
22/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$694.90
|
|
00085592
|
22/11/2011
|
Chantel & Lanfranco Roselli
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085593
|
22/11/2011
|
Dariusz Rosiak
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085594
|
22/11/2011
|
Danielle & Anthony Phillips
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085595
|
22/11/2011
|
Davey Real Estate
|
$365.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085596
|
22/11/2011
|
R Atkins
|
$636.87
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Mowing Operations Flicked Stone - Insurance
|
|
|
00085597
|
22/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$748.57
|
|
00085598
|
22/11/2011
|
Davey Real Estate
|
$280.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085599
|
22/11/2011
|
Greenwood Senior High School
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For N Glossop, C Hill, R Harvey & N Nylander To Attend The National
Schools Volleyball Championships In Dandenong 4 - 9 Dec 2011
|
|
|
00085600
|
22/11/2011
|
Jitterbugs Inc
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For C & M Poole & K McPhee To Attend The Australian Figure
Skating Championships In Boondall Qld
|
|
|
00085601
|
22/11/2011
|
Marangaroo Primary School
|
$1,762.50
|
|
|
|
Community
Development Funding Mini Derby & M Games Awesome Afternoon Of Fun
December 7 - 9 2011
|
|
|
00085602
|
22/11/2011
|
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association
|
$1,500.00
|
|
|
|
Hallmark
Funding Australia Day Breakfast January 2012
|
|
|
00085603
|
22/11/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$43.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085604
|
22/11/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$72.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085605
|
22/11/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$10,423.55
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
2 x Financial
Assistance ($165.95)
|
|
|
00085606
|
22/11/2011
|
Buckingham House Petty Cash
|
$72.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085607
|
22/11/2011
|
Landgate
|
$605.20
|
|
|
|
Land Enquiry
Searches - Property & Rating Services
|
|
|
00085608
|
22/11/2011
|
Hainsworth Youth Services Petty Cash
|
$90.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085609
|
22/11/2011
|
3 Australia
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085610
|
22/11/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$341.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085611
|
22/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085612
|
22/11/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$276,071.86
|
|
|
|
Water
Charges For Supply & Projects For The City
|
|
|
00085613
|
22/11/2011
|
Synergy
|
$3,915.09
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
5 x Financial
Assistance ($506.24)
|
|
|
00085614
|
22/11/2011
|
Telstra
|
$23,247.78
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance ($400.00)
|
|
|
00085615
|
22/11/2011
|
Mrs Jennifer Martin
|
$6.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00085616
|
22/11/2011
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington
|
$5.90
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00085617
|
22/11/2011
|
Dog Refunds - Customer Service Petty Cash
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Increase Float
For Customer Relations
|
|
|
00085618
|
22/11/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$227.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085619
|
22/11/2011
|
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash
|
$180.95
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085620
|
22/11/2011
|
Sensis Pty Ltd
|
$369.60
|
|
|
|
Advertising
For Carramar And Marangaroo Golf Courses - Property
|
|
|
00085621
|
22/11/2011
|
Woodvale Tavern Reception Centre
|
$2,800.00
|
|
|
|
HACC
Social Support Christmas Outing - Program
|
|
|
00085622
|
22/11/2011
|
Riverside Developments Company Pty
|
$27,418.19
|
|
|
|
Security
Deposit Refund Lots 127 & 128 Kingsway Landsdale Stage 1
|
|
|
00085623
|
29/11/2011
|
B Taleb
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085624
|
29/11/2011
|
Cata Group Inc
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085625
|
29/11/2011
|
J Schwarzbach
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085626
|
29/11/2011
|
Scripture Union of WA
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085627
|
29/11/2011
|
Womens Healthworks
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085628
|
29/11/2011
|
Christian Power of Pentecost Church Inc
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085629
|
29/11/2011
|
M Poett
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085630
|
29/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Senior High School
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085631
|
29/11/2011
|
Chee Seong Gan
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085632
|
29/11/2011
|
T Clarke
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085633
|
29/11/2011
|
T Wilmshurst
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085634
|
29/11/2011
|
Capricorn Society Ltd
|
$192.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Facility Hire Fee
|
|
|
00085635
|
29/11/2011
|
A D'Amore Total Body Nutrition
|
$33.38
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Facility Hire Fee
|
|
|
00085636
|
29/11/2011
|
David Evans Real Estate
|
$290.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085637
|
29/11/2011
|
Austpeak Australia Pty Ltd
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Development
Application Refund - Not Required
|
|
|
00085638
|
29/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$806.09
|
|
00085639
|
29/11/2011
|
Mr A Coddington 17 Church Street
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Cost Of Brick Paving The Verge
|
|
|
00085640
|
29/11/2011
|
Flick Enterprises
|
$320.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085641
|
29/11/2011
|
David Wall
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085642
|
29/11/2011
|
B & D Boceski
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Refund
|
|
|
00085643
|
29/11/2011
|
Ronald Mutumbiranwa
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085644
|
29/11/2011
|
Kristen Heslop
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00085645
|
29/11/2011
|
The Vicus Group
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085646
|
29/11/2011
|
Cancer Council of WA
|
$721.30
|
|
|
|
Payment
Of Monies Raised For Breast Cancer Awareness Charity Fund
|
|
|
00085647
|
29/11/2011
|
Spearwood Public Library
|
$8.80
|
|
|
|
Refund
For Payment Made For Lost Inter-Library Loan Item
|
|
|
00085648
|
29/11/2011
|
A & L McLevie
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085649
|
29/11/2011
|
Wanneroo Civic Choir
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085650
|
29/11/2011
|
Landsdale Gardens Playgroup Inc
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085651
|
29/11/2011
|
Hudson Park Primary
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00085652
|
29/11/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$632.99
|
|
00085653
|
29/11/2011
|
D C Haughan Wanneroo Caravan Park
|
$320.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085654
|
29/11/2011
|
George Holloway
|
$125.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
On Overpaid Account For Domestic Assistance
|
|
|
00085655
|
29/11/2011
|
Rebecca Kate Parr
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
For Act 1976 Infringement Notice Number 2001023 Part Payment Arrangement Not
Complied With Infringement Notice To Progress To Final Demand
|
|
|
00085656
|
29/11/2011
|
Emma Jones
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
For Western Australian Litter Act 1979 Infringement Notice Number 3001155
Part Payment Arrangement Not Complied With Infringement Notice To Progress To
The Fines Enforcement Registry
|
|
|
00085657
|
29/11/2011
|
Ivene Benson
|
$15.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Paid For Gold Program But Not Booked In
|
|
|
00085658
|
29/11/2011
|
Woodvale Tavern Reception Centre
|
$330.00
|
|
|
|
Catering
- Christmas Lunch - Program Services
|
|
|
00085659
|
29/11/2011
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Cash
Advance For Christmas Party At The Heights Community House
|
|
|
00085660
|
29/11/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$71.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085661
|
29/11/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$507.60
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
2 x Financial
Assistance ($436.35)
|
|
|
00085662
|
29/11/2011
|
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$55.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085663
|
29/11/2011
|
Fines Enforcement Registry
|
$1,118.00
|
|
|
|
Lodgement
Of 26 Infringement Notices - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
00085664
|
29/11/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$61.80
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085665
|
29/11/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$77.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085666
|
29/11/2011
|
Rangers & Safety Services Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Float For
Ranger Matthew Douse
|
|
|
00085667
|
29/11/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$1,405.70
|
|
|
|
Water Charges
For The City
|
|
|
00085668
|
29/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085669
|
29/11/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00085670
|
29/11/2011
|
Synergy
|
$20,134.80
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance ($490.70)
|
|
|
00085671
|
29/11/2011
|
Telstra
|
$137.86
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00085672
|
29/11/2011
|
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess
Claim: WN33357
|
|
|
00085673
|
29/11/2011
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$16.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00085674
|
29/11/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$386.15
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - Cheques
|
$1,337,979.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC
TRANSFER LISTING
|
|
00001400
|
01/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel
|
$2,024.00
|
|
|
|
Casual Workshop
Supervisor - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Connolly Building Company
|
$20,299.40
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Adult Day Centre Extension - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$968.01
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$5,518.65
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold
|
$682.51
|
|
|
|
Provision
Of Programming & Equipment - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$58,206.88
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd
|
$21,002.46
|
|
|
|
Fuel For
September - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Inc
|
$240.00
|
|
|
|
Business
Breakfast At Bridgeleigh - 24.08.2011 For J Paton, L Kosova, F Bentley,
R Korenhof, J Bonnick & L Brennan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001401
|
01/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$247.20
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$731.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$348,076.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$51.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,615.87
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$3,770.44
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$736.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$8,230.00
|
|
|
|
Prizes
For Charity Golf Day - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
FESA
|
$56,356.16
|
|
|
|
2011/12
ESL Income Local Government - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$488.15
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$1,906.45
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking
|
$3,403.38
|
|
|
|
Insurance
- Motor Vehicle - 22.09.11-30.06.12
|
|
|
|
|
LGISWA
|
$403.05
|
|
|
|
Insurance
- Addition To Property 05.10.11-30.06.12
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,114.10
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Jessica Pullar
|
$44.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Meals Whilst Attending Training In Bunbury
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Nicola Gannon
|
$112.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Glasses As Per City Policy
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Toyah Tinworth
|
$792.10
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Food Whilst Attending LGMA Challenge In Sydney
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Food/Flights To Sydney For The Healthy Communities Coordinators Conference
In Sydney 17-19 August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Items Purchased For The Healthy Communities Program
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Food Whilst Attending Training In Bunbury
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$7,782.94
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001402
|
08/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gwendolyn Gray
|
$1,324.32
|
|
|
|
Travel
Allowance August, September, October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$37,461.04
|
|
|
|
Commission
Fees For Carramar Golf Course October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd
|
$1,793.26
|
|
|
|
Mailroom
Services - October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf Wa Pty Ltd
|
$31,147.99
|
|
|
|
Commission
Fees To Marangaroo Golf Course October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$463.10
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Westfield Whitford City
|
$1,054.00
|
|
|
|
Gift
Vouchers For Reward & Recognition & I-Rewards - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001403
|
08/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Communications
|
$3,432.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Arborwest Tree Farm
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Plants For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Caltex Energy
|
$196.90
|
|
|
|
Fuel
- Service Charges & Adjustments - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd
|
$2,003.94
|
|
|
|
Various Drinks -
Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Different By Design
|
$1,245.00
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design
Services For Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$31,404.72
|
|
|
|
Construction
Of Shared Path Connolly Drive - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Construct
Shared Pathway Marcon Street - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$40,245.60
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$467,053.80
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Non Organic Disposal
|
$352.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$49,697.92
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City Of Wanneroo
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$1,377.60
|
|
|
|
Respirator Masks
With Valves - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware
|
$771.10
|
|
|
|
Brooms For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001404
|
15/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
21st Century Business Equipment
|
$231.00
|
|
|
|
Cash
Register & Printer Cleaned Checked & Fixed - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Adcorp Marketing Communications
|
$705.96
|
|
|
|
Advertising
- Local Government Tenders - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Nursery
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$630.13
|
|
|
|
Cash
Collection And Safe Fee - October 2011 - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Carers Association of WA
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Unspent
Grant Money For Carers WA Grant
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$23,348.04
|
|
|
|
Supply/Lay
Footpath Joondalup Drive - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$235.90
|
|
|
|
Cyclone Plumbers
Shovel - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Insite Communications
|
$440.00
|
|
|
|
Install GPS -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited
|
$43.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For WLCC
|
|
|
|
|
LD Total
|
$1,506.89
|
|
|
|
Landscaping
To Various Sites 08.08.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$402,549.51
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
National Food Service
|
$561.00
|
|
|
|
Pie
Warmer For Wanneroo Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$4,455.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce Limited
|
$23,411.08
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment
|
$15,867.56
|
|
|
|
Spray Unit For
Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$2,462.74
|
|
|
|
Immunisation
Clinic - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001405
|
15/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betahose & Fittings P/L
|
$1,012.81
|
|
|
|
Hoses For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Curnow Group Pty Ltd
|
$26,837.40
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 3 - Camira Way Beach Access Quinns Rocks
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Steel Constructions
|
$11,385.00
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 2 - Wanneroo Showgrounds Poultry Shed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001406
|
15/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$171,581.54
|
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For
October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Connolly Building Company
|
$114,892.80
|
|
|
|
Houghton
Park Amenities Building Progress Payment 4 - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001407
|
15/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post
|
$12,115.87
|
|
|
|
Billpay
Transaction Fees - October 2011 - Rates
|
|
|
|
|
Postage
Charges - October 2011 Lodgements
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$247.20
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$731.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$376,967.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Barlow Superannuation Fund
|
$3,410.08
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Building Commission
|
$14,794.00
|
|
|
|
Building
Service Levy Payment - October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$54.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,788.38
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$3,770.44
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$736.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Alan Edwin Blencowe
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$214.61
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens
|
$296.70
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie
|
$151.80
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
- October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf
|
$9,671.01
|
|
|
|
Contract
Management Fees For October 2011 - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure
Payment For October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Eftpos Fees & Equipment Rental - Quinns Rocks Caravan Park
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani
|
$49.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Hamilton
|
$99.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$1,088.20
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super
|
$269.22
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Johnson
|
$209.20
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$1,909.20
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Locke Pty Ltd
|
$2,978.14
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo
|
$109.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
John Everitt Superannuation Fund
|
$206.59
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,131.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts
|
$2,477.96
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Purchase Of Corporate Apparel
|
|
|
|
|
Travel
Allowance From 3 June To 17October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Daniel Simms
|
$79.91
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Broadband Usage - September 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Mr John Baker
|
$74.70
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Robert Cramp
|
$89.85
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Telephone Line Rental - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty
|
$149.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Karen Caple
|
$26.21
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Broadband Usage - October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Philippa Rogers
|
$196.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- ENJO Products Purchased For Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Priscilla Garrison
|
$142.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Employee Eyesight Screening & Testing
|
|
|
|
|
Peggy Brown
|
$99.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$8,606.74
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund
|
$183.24
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Claystone Superannuation Fund
|
$315.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The FIA Magid Superannuation Fund
|
$433.41
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Michael Penson Superannuation Fund
|
$761.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Saunders Superannuation Fund-Pac
|
$129.76
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$398.54
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation
|
$870,426.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001408
|
16/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates
|
$266.66
|
|
|
|
Rates
Payments Deducted From Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Alan Edwin Blencowe
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby
|
$881.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Purchase Of Corporate Apparel
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Ian Goodenough
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gwendolyn Gray
|
$1,833.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts
|
$6,166.67
|
|
|
|
Mayoral
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001409
|
15/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$368,867.31
|
|
|
|
Road
Works At Various Locations For The City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001410
|
25/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Team Printing Pty Ltd
|
$1,386.00
|
|
|
|
Printing
- 250 X Books - Parks Time Sheet Pads - Infrastructure
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Aboriginal Urban Services
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Nyungah
Welcome To Country - Capacity Building
|
|
|
|
|
Abrasiflex Pty Ltd
|
$315.15
|
|
|
|
Gloves For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Academy Clothing
|
$645.71
|
|
|
|
Uniforms
- Epaulette Shirts - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$3,071.12
|
|
|
|
First
Aid Supplies For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Acclaimed Catering
|
$3,010.98
|
|
|
|
Catering For
Council Functions
|
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service
|
$251.50
|
|
|
|
Locking
Services - Koondoola Child Health Centre - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Adasound
|
$979.00
|
|
|
|
Equipment
Hire For Dogs Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
Adcorp Marketing Communications
|
$33,887.85
|
|
|
|
Advertising For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Tailoring Company
|
$322.58
|
|
|
|
Uniform
- Lynnette Greer - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Adform
|
$820.60
|
|
|
|
Engraving
- Bush Fire Photo Board Plaques & Headers - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Aec Systems
|
$7,562.50
|
|
|
|
Civil
3D & Autocad Commercial Subscription - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd
|
$685.88
|
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder
Hire - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia
|
$625.68
|
|
|
|
Parts For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Alance Newspaper and Magazine Delivery
|
$20.40
|
|
|
|
Australian
Library Promotion - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Flower
Arrangement Box For Residents - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Flower
Wreaths For Remembrance Day - Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
All Commercial Washers
|
$457.60
|
|
|
|
Service
Call For Washing Machine At Quinns Rock Caravan Park
|
|
|
|
|
Allied Forklifts Pty Ltd
|
$970.20
|
|
|
|
Forklift Hire
October - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Altona Plumbing
|
$21,055.10
|
|
|
|
Lot
506 Rocca Way - Progress Claim #1 - September 2011 - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$5,071.92
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Angel Sounds Ensembles With Harp
|
$900.00
|
|
|
|
Harp
Flute & Guitar At Art & Craft Fair - Communications And Events
|
|
|
|
|
Anne Lake Consultancy
|
$1,650.00
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services For HR
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$1,011.53
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
ARRB Transport Research Ltd
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Road
And Transport Research Journal - Transport And Traffic
|
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply
|
$1,652.51
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Audio View Lifestyles Pty Ltd
|
$2,802.94
|
|
|
|
Audio
System Relocation - Customer Service
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority
|
$5,832.00
|
|
|
|
Apparatus
Licence Renewal Fees - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$3,465.00
|
|
|
|
Training
- Word Advanced 2007 - 11.10.11 - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Training
- Outlook Advanced 2007 - 18.10.11 - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz
|
$178.75
|
|
|
|
Plants -
Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Wool Testing Authority Limited
|
$70.00
|
|
|
|
100
Sampling Containers - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro
|
$815.10
|
|
|
|
Truck Steam For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bagmasters
|
$100.05
|
|
|
|
A4
Satchel Portrait Sewlock - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Baileys Fertilisers
|
$8,860.19
|
|
|
|
Energy Turf -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware
|
$1,823.15
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Battery World
|
$670.80
|
|
|
|
Industrial
Alkaline Various Sizes - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
BCA Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$841.50
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
- Banksia Room Modifications - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres
|
$19,044.60
|
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$3,218.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance
Excess - WN33226, WN33232 & WN32673
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$232.71
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$6,336.00
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Fire & Smoke - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Betahose & Fittings P/L
|
$3,276.89
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bev Manning
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Aerobics
Exercise Yanchep - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Biobag Australasia Pty Ltd
|
$8,167.50
|
|
|
|
60
Cartons Of Dog Poo Bags (2500 In Each) - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
BIS Fabrication Pty Ltd
|
$2,860.00
|
|
|
|
Roof
Structure For Bin Compound Banksia Grove - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Blu Griffin Pty Ltd
|
$1,369.50
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For Beach To Bush Festival - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd
|
$5,174.68
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Items For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Bosnar Engineering Pty Ltd
|
$539.00
|
|
|
|
Conveyor Roller
- WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Maintenance Services
|
$145.64
|
|
|
|
3 x Metres
Centaflex Hinge - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden Tree Consultancy
|
$385.00
|
|
|
|
Arboricultural
Assessment & Report For Numerous Declining Seedlings At The Lake Badgerup
Revegetation Site 21.10.2011 - Infrastructure Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment
|
$990.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$8,595.77
|
|
|
|
Regular Unleaded
91 Petrol For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Oil For
Stores & WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Good & Associates
|
$17,160.00
|
|
|
|
Ethnographic
Survey 2nd Field Trip Expenses - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers
|
$457.09
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
BT Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$784.50
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bullivants Pty Ltd
|
$63.93
|
|
|
|
Wire Rope For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$6,921.39
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Burkeair Pty Ltd
|
$20,089.82
|
|
|
|
Airconditioning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
C Wood Distributors
|
$915.57
|
|
|
|
Aussie
Bodies Protein Shakes/Bars - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Cafe Elixir
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
Afternoon
Tea For The Aritour - Heritage & Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Car Care (Wa) Mindarie
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Cleaning - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cardno BSB Pty Ltd
|
$3,228.50
|
|
|
|
Yanchep
Lagoon Flora & Fauna Survey - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$14,878.91
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble For Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Centurion Temporary Fencing
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Fence
Hire For Dog's Breakfast On 27-31.10.11 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Chadson Engineering Pty Ltd
|
$207.90
|
|
|
|
Pooltest
& Calibration - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Essentials Pty Ltd
|
$739.20
|
|
|
|
Vet Disinfectant
- Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering
|
$10,105.90
|
|
|
|
Catering For
Various Council Functions
|
|
|
|
|
Chess Moving
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Removal Services
For Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Children's Book Council of Australia
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Membership
Subscription 2012 - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Chiorino Australia Pty Ltd
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Chiorino
Fasteners Flexco - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
City Business Machines
|
$721.87
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
City Panelbeaters Truck Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$1,655.08
|
|
|
|
Supply
And Fit Front Bumper And Steps - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd
|
$18,151.14
|
|
|
|
Annual
Maintenance & 61 X Trim Licenses - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Licence Renewal Fee - EDMS Integration - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Expense
Recovery - IR
|
|
|
|
|
Clean It Environmental Solutions
|
$2,414.50
|
|
|
|
Roadsweeping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Clever Patch Creative Solutions
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Coastal Services
|
$247.50
|
|
|
|
Repair
Dishwasher - Wanneroo Recreation Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$9,779.42
|
|
|
|
Equipment Hire
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd
|
$1,048.81
|
|
|
|
Beverages For
Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Coffey Commercial Advisory
|
$4,988.50
|
|
|
|
CO
Location Opportunity For Equest & Wheeled Sport Association -
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Collins Craft & School Supplies
|
$98.93
|
|
|
|
Gallery
Glass Leading And Various Items - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Colmax Glass Pty Ltd
|
$6,204.83
|
|
|
|
Glass Recycling
Oct 11 - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Colourpoint Print & Design
|
$743.00
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Bush Fires Infringement Notice Books - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police
|
$195.50
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Police Checks Sep 2011 - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Community Newspapers
|
$27,523.10
|
|
|
|
Advertising By
The City September 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Theatre
|
$64,867.30
|
|
|
|
Volunteers
Event - Kingsway Sporting Complex - Communications And Events
|
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia
|
$98.70
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Coventry Fasteners
|
$85.07
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet & WRC
|
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts
|
$1,291.40
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
CSG Application Services
|
$1,760.00
|
|
|
|
Crystal
Reports Fundamentals - Lynn Clough - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd
|
$1,006.61
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Cutting Edges Pty Ltd
|
$47.89
|
|
|
|
Plowbolt -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
DA Information Services Pty Ltd
|
$271.49
|
|
|
|
Publications For
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited
|
$819.61
|
|
|
|
Software For IT
|
|
|
|
|
David Gray & Company Pty Ltd
|
$33,320.32
|
|
|
|
Graybate 20Kg -
Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
DBS Fencing
|
$1,881.00
|
|
|
|
Fencing Works
For Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd
|
$6,492.53
|
|
|
|
Computers And
Accessories For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Department of The Premier and Cabinet
|
$65.00
|
|
|
|
Government
Gazette Advertising - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Dharma Media Pty Ltd
|
$2,002.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$1,966.00
|
|
|
|
Locking Services
- Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Dick Smith Electronics
|
$444.99
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Parks And IT
|
|
|
|
|
Dieback Treatment Services
|
$1,210.00
|
|
|
|
Tree Works -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Soil
And Tissue Samples - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Diggers Bobcat Services
|
$1,111.00
|
|
|
|
Repointing
Works At Queenscliffe Park
|
|
|
|
|
Repair Walls -
Jack Barlow Park
|
|
|
|
|
Diplomat Blades (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$4,006.20
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print
|
$2,493.70
|
|
|
|
Printing - Arrow
Direction - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Event Signage - Community Programs And Services
|
|
|
|
|
DMS Energy
|
$7,422.00
|
|
|
|
Solar
And Sandblast Film - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$112,214.05
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Practice Wicket At Kingsway Sports Ground - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
Of Footpath - Various Locations - Projects/Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics
|
$1,208.25
|
|
|
|
Repair Wiring
Harness And Switch - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Dymocks Joondalup
|
$390.81
|
|
|
|
Various
Publications - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Dysons Packaging Pty Ltd
|
$889.90
|
|
|
|
Paper Cups For
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher
|
$768.70
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$528.01
|
|
|
|
Disposal
Of Rubble - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
E'Co Australia Ltd
|
$532.40
|
|
|
|
Bag Of Rags -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd
|
$261.80
|
|
|
|
Rental
Of Hydrolab Quanta - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Eco-Care (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$471.90
|
|
|
|
General
Cleaning October 2011 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Edcursions
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Advertisement -
Heritage And Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Elan Media Partners Pty Ltd
|
$2,396.52
|
|
|
|
Various Books -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd
|
$41,339.72
|
|
|
|
Streetscape
Maintenance - Wanneroo - October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd
|
$704.55
|
|
|
|
Parts Washer
Service For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Esri Australia
|
$1,572.12
|
|
|
|
Working
With 3D GIS Using Arcgis - City Growth
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services
|
$4,699.38
|
|
|
|
Fire
Equipment Services - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.)
|
$3,932.15
|
|
|
|
Site
Services To Butler For October 2011 - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Excalibur Printing
|
$989.01
|
|
|
|
Polo
Shirts For Driver Reviver Program - Infrastructure Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Embroidered Caps
- City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Ezyjuke Jukebox Hire
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Jukebox
Hire For Heights Community Centre - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd
|
$1,564.36
|
|
|
|
Various
Magazines - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Quadrant
|
$16,060.00
|
|
|
|
Contact
Centre Consulting Services & Final Presentation By Catriona Wallace -
City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services
|
$2,138.84
|
|
|
|
Location
Of Services For Various Project Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Flying Heart Productions
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
For Dogs Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
Foodlink Food Service
|
$2,079.14
|
|
|
|
Various Catering
Items For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Forms Express
|
$1,419.88
|
|
|
|
A4 Press Seal
Payslip - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Forpark Australia
|
$583.00
|
|
|
|
Modify
Disc Swing - Butterworth Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd
|
$586.08
|
|
|
|
Brake Cleaner -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Foxcomp Technology Pty Ltd
|
$131.90
|
|
|
|
Samsung
K660B Black Cartridge - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Foxtel
|
$81.00
|
|
|
|
Foxtel For
Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Freds Hardware
|
$590.00
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$814.61
|
|
|
|
Paper Supplies -
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd
|
$17,031.58
|
|
|
|
Tree
Works At Various Locations - Parks & Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Geon
|
$27,618.80
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Flyers - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Your Dog And The Law - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
– What’s Happening Newsletter - October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Mayoral Letterheads With Foil - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Mailing
Charges - Dog Licences & Fire Break Notices - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Getty Images Pty Ltd
|
$2,375.12
|
|
|
|
Online
Graphic Images Subscription For One Year - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$122,178.10
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services - Stage 5 - Kingsway Sport Complex - Construction Administration
& Carpark Claim 50% Design - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services - Flynn Drive Wanneroo Road - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Gliderol
|
$840.00
|
|
|
|
Second
Payment - Replace Damaged Garage Door At Celebration Boulevard - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota
|
$201,613.75
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services
For Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
5 x
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Hilux Super ($37,357.05 Each) - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Thornton
|
$11,137.50
|
|
|
|
Interim Fee -
Annual Audit - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Grass Growers
|
$43,171.92
|
|
|
|
Supply
Plant & Operators To Mulch Green Waste Stockpiles On Site - Wangara
Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia
|
$350.02
|
|
|
|
Zamia
Palm Maintenance - Caporn Park - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees
Service - Pinjar Road 20.10.2011 - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Hire
Of Hiab - Depot To Kingsway Rugby - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Compost Pickups
- Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$245.36
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Gymcare
|
$1,010.90
|
|
|
|
Call Out Time On
Report - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd
|
$1,059.96
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Items For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd
|
$296.36
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Hart Sport
|
$470.80
|
|
|
|
Netball
Bib Sets & Freight - Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics
|
$206.75
|
|
|
|
Spare
Parts For Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Olsen
|
$405.00
|
|
|
|
Fitness
Classes 9 X $45 - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Hendercare
|
$28,235.92
|
|
|
|
Support Services
For CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Hisco
|
$203.50
|
|
|
|
Thermometer
Digital Probe & Thermometer Fridge/Freezer - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd
|
$1,972.66
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters
For Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$1,304.18
|
|
|
|
Meals For
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare Options
|
$16,225.16
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Honeywell Ltd
|
$2,956.26
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Maintenance At WLCC - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products
|
$11,046.38
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Items For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps
|
$183,280.90
|
|
|
|
Pump
Works At Various Parks In The City
|
|
|
|
|
IBolt Fencing
|
$18,122.50
|
|
|
|
Fencing
Works At Various Locations For The City
|
|
|
|
|
IFAP
|
$135.00
|
|
|
|
Manual
Handling Training Course Attendees C Drummond-Hay & L Lindeboom -
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Independence Studios Pty Ltd
|
$269.94
|
|
|
|
Assorted Retail
Items From Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Valuers of Western Australia
|
$13,200.00
|
|
|
|
Valuation
For Alkimos-Eglinton Developer Contributions - City Growth
|
|
|
|
|
InfoCouncil Pty Ltd
|
$680.63
|
|
|
|
Support
Fees - 17.10.11-30.10.11 - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services
|
$5,160.76
|
|
|
|
Call
Centre Services For September 2011 - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Intercity Office Partitioning
|
$13,711.00
|
|
|
|
Banksia Room
Refurbishment - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Interquartz Pty Ltd
|
$229.02
|
|
|
|
Handset For It
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA
|
$297.00
|
|
|
|
International
Infrastructure Management Manual - Asset Management
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA
|
$8,972.50
|
|
|
|
Public
Works Training Week For Various Employees - Infrastructure Assets
|
|
|
|
|
IRIS Consulting Group Pty Ltd
|
$748.00
|
|
|
|
Training
- Records Management Basics, Keyword Classification, Records Disposal
03-04.11.11 - I Preedy & S Willcott
|
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd
|
$4,877.49
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Sign Makers
|
$37,771.80
|
|
|
|
Signage
- Yaberoo Budjara Heritage Trail - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd
|
$554.07
|
|
|
|
Apple Ipad2 -
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
John Smart Removals
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Removal Services
For Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Coachline
|
$297.00
|
|
|
|
Bus Hire - Gold
Program
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Electrical Retail Centre
|
$688.00
|
|
|
|
Replacement
Oven For Warradale Community Centre - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Lock Service & Building Maintenance
|
$82.50
|
|
|
|
Repairs
At Kiosk Corner Hester/Ridgewood Blvd - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Photo Design
|
$2,306.25
|
|
|
|
Photography
- Outgoing Councillors Group Shot
|
|
|
|
|
Photography -
Mayor Kelly Function
|
|
|
|
|
Photography
- New Council/Executive Portraits/Ceremony/Swearing In
|
|
|
|
|
Photography
- Pound, Mayday Dog Rescue - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Photography
Rubbish Trucks/ Bins - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Photography
- FESA Sign/Fire Trucks - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Kangaroo Kookies
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Live
Cake Demonstration - Dogs Breakfast - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services
|
$7,817.00
|
|
|
|
Training
- Traffic Management Refresher - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Training
- Basic Traffic Management - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Training
- Manual Tasking/Handling Course - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Kennards Hire Pty Ltd
|
$96.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Hedge
Trimmer - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Keysbrook Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$200.64
|
|
|
|
Drycleaning -
Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kleenit
|
$2,714.00
|
|
|
|
Graffiti
Removal At Butler Skate Park - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning BBQ At
Rotary Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Promotions
|
$742.50
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services To Capricorn House - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$4,669.84
|
|
|
|
Photocopier
Meter Reading For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables Pty Ltd
|
$394.61
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire
|
$420.75
|
|
|
|
Rental
Of Indoor Plants At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control
|
$9,610.15
|
|
|
|
Spray
Tracks At Koondoola Bushland - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Spraying At
Rufus Park - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark
|
$2,966.92
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks & Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Laser Ranger
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Laser
Clay Pigeon Shooting - Gold Program
|
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
$11,454.08
|
|
|
|
Replace
Turf - Kingsway Football & Blackmore Park
|
|
|
|
|
NPK Fertiliser
At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
LD Total
|
$118,397.57
|
|
|
|
Landscaping
Maintenance At Various Locations - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Install
Semi Mountable Kerb Pinjar Road & Edward Road
|
|
|
|
|
Len French Fencing Contractor
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Fencing
Works At Various Locations For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific
|
$2,070.66
|
|
|
|
Group
Fitness Class Licences 2011/12 - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
- LGMA 2011 Annual State Conference - D Simms
|
|
|
|
|
Logo Appointments
|
$947.93
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Lyons & Peirce
|
$3,454.00
|
|
|
|
Clean
Pipes At Rosegreen Ave/Dressler Way - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
M & K Bailey Accredited Newsagents
|
$33.60
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company
|
$29,506.94
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Madcat Digital Design
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Single
Use Licence For 1 Year Of Copyright - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$1,446.51
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services
For Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$96,937.50
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment
Hire For The City
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors
|
$9,225.23
|
|
|
|
Legal
Fees - Food Act Prosecutions - Health
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Fees - Easement In Gross - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Fees - Prosecution Dog Attack - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Fees - Parking Prosecution - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
McLernon's Supply & Demand
|
$1,513.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanical Project Services Pty Ltd
|
$1,896.40
|
|
|
|
Equipment
Repairs For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mey Equipment
|
$378.29
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd
|
$184.62
|
|
|
|
Water Pipe -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd
|
$19,476.22
|
|
|
|
Pavers For
Various Project Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$85,398.71
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mining & Hydraulic Supplies
|
$63.03
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd
|
$17,914.19
|
|
|
|
Fuel For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$3,905.00
|
|
|
|
Repair/Replace
Play Equipment - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors
|
$546.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Shred Onsite
|
$206.80
|
|
|
|
Shredding
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd
|
$254.87
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Museum Playgroup
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$613.85
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Move It
|
$363.00
|
|
|
|
Moving
Of Tables From Clarkson Library To Two Rocks Library & Old Wanneroo
Library Building
|
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$1,938.48
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
On Beach Accessways At Quinns Rocks & Yanchep - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Edward Juras
|
$1,422.66
|
|
|
|
Fox
Trapping At Yellagonga - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Glenn Howell
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Madd
Gear Team Edition Scooter & Logo - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Peter Doherty
|
$3,740.00
|
|
|
|
Re
Woodhouse Legal - Wanneroo Re: SP80 - Corporate Strategy & Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Trevor Bly
|
$63.00
|
|
|
|
Book Purchase -
Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Nationwide Training
|
$894.00
|
|
|
|
One
Day Forklift Course - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Newsxpress Ocean Keys
|
$40.40
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals
- Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Nick's Bus Charter
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
HACC Social
Support Outing
|
|
|
|
|
Non Organic Disposal
|
$209.44
|
|
|
|
Under
Paid Invoice 00031561 - Credit Taken Up Twice
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$12,051.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists
|
$1,489.01
|
|
|
|
Backpack
Blower - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Northsands Resources
|
$315.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Greens - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Notice Board Systems Pty Ltd
|
$82.50
|
|
|
|
Additional
Artwork Advertising - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$333.30
|
|
|
|
Stone Repair -
99219 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Fit Windscreen To WN33225 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
NSC Enterprise Solutions Pty Ltd
|
$1,768.80
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Telecommunications Equipment Servicing Agreement For Period
01.11.11 - 30.11.11
|
|
|
|
|
Nuford
|
$39,923.80
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
New
Vehicle Purchase - Ford Ranger WN 33214 $38,916.60
|
|
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Investment
Advisory/Reporting Fee - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd
|
$1,864.77
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$44,185.49
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Officemax
|
$3,283.19
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$140.00
|
|
|
|
Sandisk Memory
Card Holder - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Orica Australia P/L
|
$2,100.44
|
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals
For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Osborne Park Welding Supplies
|
$393.58
|
|
|
|
Repair
To Workshop Welder - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford Uniforms
|
$240.00
|
|
|
|
4 X Torches -
Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group
|
$13,559.02
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies
|
$818.00
|
|
|
|
Arboricultural
Report On Various Trees - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conti Estate Bottled Wines
|
$216.00
|
|
|
|
Beverages
For Mayor’s Farewell Function 14/10/2011 - Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
People Rich Pty Ltd
|
$1,900.00
|
|
|
|
Extended
Disc Debrief - Four 1 Hour Coaching Sessions - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Personalised Landscape & Design
|
$333.96
|
|
|
|
Repair Bullnose
- Crivell Park
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Bin Hire
|
$12,542.91
|
|
|
|
Truck/Driver/Bin/Compactor
Bin Hire - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Convention Bureau
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
1 X
Ticket - Oceanic Spring Cruise - Networking Function - WLCC
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd
|
$456.72
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Belt -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Meditation Centre
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Meditation
Workshop At Yanchep Library 20.10.11 - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters
|
$480.00
|
|
|
|
Bus
Hire - Beach To Bush Event - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Pinakis Refrigeration Works Pty Ltd
|
$478.50
|
|
|
|
Repair
Cool Room Door - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Pink Healthcare Services
|
$3,350.61
|
|
|
|
Hygenic
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting
|
$2,021.58
|
|
|
|
Work
At Kingsway Rugby - Liddell Park & Renner Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Extra
Sand Machine Cleaning - Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Plantrite
|
$4,589.60
|
|
|
|
Various Plants
For Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
3%
Monthly Holding & Maintenance Fee Of Contract Grown Stock Remaining As At
31.07.11 - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$2,201.59
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Polytechnic West
|
$217.31
|
|
|
|
Certificate
III In Automotive Electrical Technology - G Garratt - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Portner Press Pty Ltd
|
$134.00
|
|
|
|
Employment
And Health And Safety 2011 Update - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Premier Tarps
|
$9,372.00
|
|
|
|
Supply & Fit
Tarp - Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$12,254.46
|
|
|
|
Alarm Services
For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Printstuf
|
$1,046.90
|
|
|
|
Printing
– Basestock for Funded Services, Youth Services & Hainsworth -
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Membership Agreements - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce Limited
|
$96,941.48
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$3,591.79
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Public Libraries WA Inc
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Membership
2011/2012 - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Design
|
$257.07
|
|
|
|
Summer Escapes
Advert - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Put On Happy Face - Face Painting
|
$828.00
|
|
|
|
Face
Painters/Bouncy Castle For Dogs Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
PWE Valuations Pty Ltd
|
$605.00
|
|
|
|
Meeting To
Discuss Valuation - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$157.30
|
|
|
|
NDM Testing -
Joondalup Drive
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd
|
$522.56
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management
|
$12,500.83
|
|
|
|
Recall
Services Retrievals & Collections - IM
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation Safety Australia
|
$143.00
|
|
|
|
Playground
Design Audit For Bower Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Recycling Design & Technologies (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$70,055.70
|
|
|
|
MRF
Installation - Supply/Install Glass Separating & Grading System Upgrade
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Red Hot Group WA
|
$78.50
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd
|
$47.50
|
|
|
|
Refresh
15L - Library Services - Girrawheen
|
|
|
|
|
Reinol Wa
|
$177.54
|
|
|
|
Hand Cleaner -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Retech Rubber Pty Ltd
|
$1,991.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs
To Play Area At Rotary Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs
To Scenic Park And Wanneroo Showground - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Richgro
|
$1,102.00
|
|
|
|
Landscape
Mix & Delivery - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Rightrack
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Wheel Alignments
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services
|
$20,381.90
|
|
|
|
Road
Spotting Services At Various Projects Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia
|
$734.14
|
|
|
|
Directional/Street
Signs For Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Robertsons Lifting & Rigging Pty Ltd
|
$16.76
|
|
|
|
Tested Trailer
Shackles - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald John Woodbine
|
$2,090.00
|
|
|
|
2011 Annual
Report Design - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd
|
$3,076.70
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Safemaster
|
$451.00
|
|
|
|
Recertification
Height Safety System At Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$2,905.71
|
|
|
|
Safety Items For
Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd
|
$1,534.50
|
|
|
|
Licence
Fee For Wanneroo Site - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd
|
$5,629.37
|
|
|
|
Lift
& Escalator Services At Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sealanes
|
$936.05
|
|
|
|
Food/Beverages -
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Seamless (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$2,288.00
|
|
|
|
Admin
Development For The Lost Animals Data - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Seton Australia
|
$269.28
|
|
|
|
Sign
- No Smoking In This Area - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals
|
$1,228.50
|
|
|
|
Annual
Dry Chemical Supply - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals For
Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio
|
$6,033.50
|
|
|
|
Professional
Services For Houghton Park Sports Amenities Building - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports
|
$1,086.80
|
|
|
|
Various
Items For Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Smudgeart
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
Art Exhibit For
Dogs Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
Snack Time Vending
|
$650.70
|
|
|
|
Snacks
For Vending Machine At Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Snells Distribution
|
$124.30
|
|
|
|
Film
License Fee - To Sir With Love - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Solver Paints
|
$1,019.63
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sorensen Short & Associates
|
$4,607.24
|
|
|
|
Survey
Corner Of Lagoon & Marmion Avenue - Property
|
|
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions
|
$389.62
|
|
|
|
CD & DVD
Cases For Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Cross Cleaning Services
|
$3,241.33
|
|
|
|
Madeley
Work Order - General Cleaning Services For September - Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Metropolitan Regional Council
|
$11,000.00
|
|
|
|
Sale
Of MRF Stock - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd
|
$14,575.00
|
|
|
|
Install
Cricket Nets At Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding
|
$43.34
|
|
|
|
GC
Bin Exchange - Business Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd
|
$2,623.50
|
|
|
|
Site
Inspection & Report At Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Sports World of WA
|
$8,383.10
|
|
|
|
Sport
Shoes For Gym Program - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Swimming Items
For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd
|
$99.67
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment
|
$388.41
|
|
|
|
Refurbish Sting
Controller - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance of Australia
|
$1,561.54
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
& Workplace Kits - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors
|
$14,641.00
|
|
|
|
Loader
Hire For Badgerup Greens - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Standout Signs
|
$143.00
|
|
|
|
Supply Of
Polycarb Stencil - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$2,733.23
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Supplies For Hospitality/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services
|
$2,927.00
|
|
|
|
Various Works
For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Turf Services
|
$54,198.54
|
|
|
|
Various
Sites - Supply And Install Turf - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sterihealth Services Pty Ltd
|
$110.83
|
|
|
|
Sharpsmart -
Health
|
|
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service
|
$525.80
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Of Linen For Civic Centre - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Weekly Bag Wash
- Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Stihl Shop Greenwood
|
$249.00
|
|
|
|
Blower -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Stiles Electrical
|
$71,509.35
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim 1 For Banksia Room Electrical Modifications - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Stl Consulting
|
$786.50
|
|
|
|
2 X
Sheep Dog Demonstrations - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City Publishing Pty Ltd
|
$1,950.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising -
October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Superior Pak
|
$10,197.00
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Compactor Repairs - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades
|
$9,488.00
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Shade Sails - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Swan Towing Services Pty Ltd
|
$433.40
|
|
|
|
Towing Services
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Swim Australia
|
$822.00
|
|
|
|
Waterproof Paper
Packs - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Swimwest
Conference - Aquamotion Swim School
|
|
|
|
|
Syme Marmion & Co
|
$9,900.00
|
|
|
|
Workforce
Planning & Representation Model - CEOs Office
|
|
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd
|
$535.92
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Techniworks Action Learning Pty Ltd
|
$6,960.80
|
|
|
|
Techniworks
LMS Training For G Beatty - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Training -
Records For A Boyce
|
|
|
|
|
The Constable Care Child Safety Project Inc
|
$11,000.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Partnership Agreement Between Constable Care & Child Safety Foundation - Regulatory
|
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara
|
$2,282.50
|
|
|
|
Sales Wacker
Plate Compactor - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Hire - Concrete
Saw - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
The Jaffa Room
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Non
Theatrical Rights To Screen Various Films - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
The Maze
|
$1,210.00
|
|
|
|
HACC
Social Club Outing - Funded Programs
|
|
|
|
|
The Red Book Service
|
$1,144.00
|
|
|
|
Web Lookup
Service - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia WA Branch Inc
|
$9,819.00
|
|
|
|
Completed
Home Pool Inspections - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Endorsed
Swim School Promotion - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Senior First Aid
Course - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Dogs
Breakfast - First Aid Services For Event - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Swim
Certificates For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Junior
Lifeguard Clublog Books - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Lifeguard
Requalification - R Dobson, C Romans - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
The Watershed Water Systems
|
$26,944.33
|
|
|
|
Reticulation
Fittings - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
The West Australian Music Industry Association Inc
|
$1,375.00
|
|
|
|
WAMS
School Alive Concert St Anthonys School 29.09.11 - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
B2B
Concert - Music Jam Session - 19.11.11 - Communications & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd
|
$1,605.35
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Total Road Services
|
$50,536.62
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Total Steel of Aust Pty Ltd
|
$690.80
|
|
|
|
Steel Products
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota Material Handling (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$297.00
|
|
|
|
Drive Chain
& Freight - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
TQuip
|
$1,771.45
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd
|
$6,304.67
|
|
|
|
Works At
Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$13,599.85
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Works For Parks Maintenance Irrigation Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
Truckline
|
$309.82
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Turbotech Turbochargers
|
$1,066.83
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$28,904.63
|
|
|
|
Weed Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Annual
Volunteer Christmas Function - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
United Equipment
|
$7,396.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
VE Graphics
|
$715.00
|
|
|
|
Black
Self Adhesive Vinyl - Cleaning & Replacing Graphics - Asset
Management
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd
|
$1,835.90
|
|
|
|
Repair
To Radio Serial Number 19289872 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Installation
Of CB Radios In 4 Vehicles - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vetwest Wanneroo
|
$221.35
|
|
|
|
Consultation
For Dogs - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service
|
$7,101.96
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies
|
$84.40
|
|
|
|
Stationery Items
For Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
WA Profiling
|
$2,241.37
|
|
|
|
Joondalup
Drive & Castledene Way - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Wangara Tree & Lawn Equipment
|
$52.00
|
|
|
|
Blade
Sharpening 2 Doubles - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery
|
$1,481.10
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Stores/Fleet/WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One
|
$417.50
|
|
|
|
Various Tools To
For Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators
|
$6,103.90
|
|
|
|
Steel
Fabrication Works - Building Maintenance & Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$63,397.06
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Catering Cost For Joint Training Exercise & Launch Of New Water Tanker
- Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Glass
|
$396.00
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$15,801.06
|
|
|
|
Plumbing
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$895.40
|
|
|
|
Towing
Of Vehicles - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$1,301.00
|
|
|
|
Various
Medals For Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Engraving
Of Pewter Medals For Student Citizenship
|
|
|
|
|
Name Badges For
Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Shield
- Charity Golf Day Championships - Communications And Events
|
|
|
|
|
Jarrah
Small Shield With Logo For Emergency Services Participation Award
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Villa Tavern
|
$422.00
|
|
|
|
Beverages For
Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Water Dynamics
|
$4,364.80
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Works
At Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Wattleup Tractors
|
$164.35
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wattyl Australia Pty Ltd
|
$105.27
|
|
|
|
Paint For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Ltd
|
$1,485.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising
- General Features - Tourism - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$2,343.03
|
|
|
|
Nurses For
Immunisation Clinics - Health
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Institute of Training
|
$2,856.00
|
|
|
|
Training
For M Vella & M Barrows - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Radiators
|
$2,065.00
|
|
|
|
Service
Radiator & Repair Tank & Replace Filler Neck - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Westbuild Products Pty Ltd
|
$1,195.92
|
|
|
|
Rapid Set
Concrete - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Westrac
|
$900.45
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd
|
$129.80
|
|
|
|
Cash
In Transit Services For October 2011 - City Business
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd
|
$18,790.71
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Wild West Hyundai
|
$25,816.60
|
|
|
|
New
Vehicle Purchase - Hyundai Wagon - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal
|
$7,322.70
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees -
Structure Plan - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Wooldridges
|
$424.80
|
|
|
|
Marker Artline
Paint - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber
|
$813.56
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Worksense
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Riggers Gloves
For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$1,056.00
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Business Cards For Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Healthy Community Banners - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil
|
$18.15
|
|
|
|
Waste
Oil Disposal - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
WS Coating Services
|
$3,557.40
|
|
|
|
Sandblast &
Spraypaint Trailer - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wurths Australia Pty Ltd
|
$95.74
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Stores & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
X-Men Security Services
|
$1,058.20
|
|
|
|
Security
Services For Dogs Breakfast Event - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
XP Software
|
$2,995.00
|
|
|
|
Xpsuite
Enterprise Edition Renewal Of 2nd & 3rd Year Contract - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Xpress Magazine
|
$594.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising -
Festival Guide - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Zipform
|
$18,091.70
|
|
|
|
Printing/Issue
Of 2011/12 Rates Interim Notices - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001411
|
21/11/2011
|
City of Wanneroo - Muni
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
Reconciliation November 2011 $26,682.15 Breakdown At End Of Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001412
|
22/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Australia
|
$639.13
|
|
|
|
Paging Account
For Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Heerkens
|
$240.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer -
Community Bus Drive
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$366.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Purchase Of Corporate Apparel From Myer Perth City
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Ownership Searches - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$283.40
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Oscar Shu
|
$392.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Study Assistance - 50% Of CPA Global Strategy & Leadership Fees
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Ron Hoffman
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer -
Community Bus Drive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001413
|
22/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carers Association of Wa
|
$307.60
|
|
|
|
Unspent
Funds From Carers Short Break Grant - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cossill & Webley Pty Ltd
|
$4,636.50
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim For Design & Documentation Consultancy Land Requirements For
Joondalup Drv/Neaves Rd/Old Yanchep Rd - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Different By Design
|
$975.00
|
|
|
|
On-Site
Graphic Design Services - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$1,425.99
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001414
|
22/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$553,157.19
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 2 For Upgrade Of Ocean Reef Road - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001415
|
29/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$458.55
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Artist Voice
|
$13,750.00
|
|
|
|
Final
Payment - Evermore - 19.11.11 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel
|
$4,951.45
|
|
|
|
Casual Mechanic
- Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$3,031.87
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$636.14
|
|
|
|
Locking
Services - Tamarama Park Clarkson - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$15,250.71
|
|
|
|
Brick
Paving/Concrete Works To Cylinders Loop Clarkson
|
|
|
|
|
DVM Fencing
|
$1,089.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs
To Damaged Fence - Sump On Moriset Way Ashby - Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Ergolink
|
$7,080.20
|
|
|
|
Ergonomic
Equipment For HR
|
|
|
|
|
Freds Hardware
|
$70.79
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$4,872.31
|
|
|
|
Equipment Lease
Fees For Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Martin
|
$2,062.50
|
|
|
|
Conduct
CEO's Annual Performance Review
|
|
|
|
|
Hendercare
|
$10,895.56
|
|
|
|
HACC Services -
Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps
|
$179,698.20
|
|
|
|
Carramar
Golf Course Pump Station Installation - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Intercity Office Partitioning
|
$1,371.00
|
|
|
|
Original
Invoice Underpaid - Banksia Room Modifications
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$530.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees -
Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited
|
$689.00
|
|
|
|
Various
Items For End Of Year Party & Skate Competition - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Knight And Sons
|
$537.24
|
|
|
|
Food For Animal
Pound - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Kott Gunning Lawyers
|
$1,750.71
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees -
Coby - City Lawyer
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$1,637.21
|
|
|
|
Photocopier
Meter Reading For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Logo Appointments
|
$1,790.53
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For Accounts Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$218,237.79
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Morrison Low Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$57,750.00
|
|
|
|
Professional
Services - Workshops & Collection Of Data - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$918.50
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce Limited
|
$32,707.28
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Star Three Media Pty Ltd
|
$396.00
|
|
|
|
Hosting
Special Pack For Wanneroo-Property.Com.Au - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Treasury Corporation
|
$937,503.55
|
|
|
|
Loan
Repayment Due 01.12.2011 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001416
|
29/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$247.20
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$731.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$364,602.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$54.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,820.84
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$3,817.44
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$750.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden
|
$3,983.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
IT &
Communications Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf
|
$9,629.01
|
|
|
|
Quinns
Rocks Caravan Park Eftpos Fees - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Quinns
Rocks Caravan Park - Contract Management Fees For November 2011
|
|
|
|
|
FESA
|
$3,951,423.85
|
|
|
|
2011/12 ESL
Quarter 2 Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$695.85
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$1,909.20
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,114.10
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Michael Penson
|
$630.00
|
|
|
|
Re-Imbursement
Of Subscription To CPA Australia 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Wayne Crawford
|
$635.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Study Assistance - Advance Diploma Of Occupational Health & Safety
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Fung Kuen Lucia Lam
|
$56.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Broadband Usage From 01.10.11 - 30.10.11
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Melissa Dray
|
$96.20
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Purchase Of 100 X SD Storage Cases - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$8,606.74
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001417
|
29/11/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curnow Group Pty Ltd
|
$205,023.06
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim # 1 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Redevelopment Stage 5 - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - EFT's
|
$13,252,148.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES
FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD
|
|
84966
|
11/10/2011
|
Melwest
Design
|
-$139.00
|
|
85054
|
18/10/2011
|
M
Pearce
|
-$33.80
|
|
1394-6100
|
25/10/2011
|
National
Food Service
|
-$561.00
|
|
85210
|
25/10/2011
|
J
Soden
|
-$700.00
|
|
84289
|
23/08/2011
|
C
Stott
|
-$12.90
|
|
85128
|
25/10/2011
|
Hinchinbrook
Health Care
|
-$220.00
|
|
84571
|
13/09/2011
|
I
Hicks
|
-$20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
-$1,686.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME
|
|
|
|
Cell 4
|
|
|
|
|
McGees
Property - Market Value - 259 Lenore Road Wanneroo
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Cell 9
|
|
|
|
|
Haines
Norton Chartered Accountants - Internal Audit Services
|
$1,717.67
|
|
|
|
Cell 8
|
|
|
|
|
PWE
Valuations Pty Ltd - Updated Valuation Flynn Drive Neerabup
|
$2,391.37
|
|
|
|
PWE
Valuations Pty Ltd - Review of Valuation Becher Way Gnangara
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
PWE
Valuations Pty Ltd - Review of Valuation Becher Way Gnangara
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Cell 1
|
|
|
|
|
McGees
Property - Market Value - Lot 19 Pinjar Road Ashby
|
$1,500.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$8,859.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank
Account
|
|
|
|
Payroll Payments
November 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
01/11/2011
|
$1,292,136.52
|
|
|
|
15/11/2011
|
$1,359,569.83
|
|
|
|
18/11/2011
|
$1,636.30
|
|
|
|
24/11/2011
|
$22,674.00
|
|
|
|
29/11/2011
|
$1,301,359.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total
|
$3,977,376.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees November
2011: EFT 1411
|
|
|
|
|
CBA
Merchant Fee
|
$4,655.14
|
|
|
|
CBA
Pos Fee
|
$299.81
|
|
|
|
GLF
Trans Fee
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Line
Fee
|
$208.30
|
|
|
|
Account
Service Fee
|
$588.00
|
|
|
|
Commbiz
Fee
|
$314.47
|
|
|
|
Bpay
Fees Rates
|
$4,547.40
|
|
|
|
Bpay
Fees Debtors
|
$377.00
|
|
|
|
Bpoint
Fees Rates
|
$466.25
|
|
|
|
Bpoint
Fees Debtors
|
$47.29
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Direct Debit Return Fees
|
$52.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees
|
$11,856.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments
October 2011: EFT 1411
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Items For In-house Catering October 2011
|
$1,686.24
|
|
|
|
Flowers Purchase
|
$64.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality For Mayor’s Farewell
|
$96.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Caple
|
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$17.00
|
|
|
|
Conference Expenses
|
$41.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$183.00
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance - A Curtis
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Interpreting Services For Regulatory Services
|
$433.40
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance
|
$304.00
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$25.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Bentley
|
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance - S Musgrave & D Little
|
$166.00
|
|
|
|
Subscription - Heritage
|
$183.04
|
|
|
|
Furniture Purchase - Library
|
$492.60
|
|
|
|
Publication Purchase - Heritage
|
$76.96
|
|
|
|
Furniture Hire For Function
|
$166.00
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$11.30
|
|
|
|
Publication Purchase - HR
|
$890.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Blair
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Card For A Rathnayake
|
$90.00
|
|
|
|
Clearing Permit
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Kosova
|
|
|
|
|
Clearing Permit
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance - G Maling
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Company Search Fee
|
$59.00
|
|
|
|
Conference Expenses - A Blake
|
$390.00
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance - P Thompson
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Paton
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription For IT
|
$212.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms
|
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$24.56
|
|
|
|
Membership Renewal
|
$225.42
|
|
|
|
Seminar Attendance A Bostock
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$184.58
|
|
|
|
Conference Attendance
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$10.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Wanneroo Day Centre
|
$514.85
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Sound Level Motion Unit For W Crawford
|
$2,149.26
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Wanneroo Day Centre
|
$514.85
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Clarkson/Butler Youth Programs
|
$207.43
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Yancep/Two Rocks Youth Programs
|
$207.43
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Ergo Mouse - W Crawford
|
$85.46
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Alexander Heights Care Centre
|
$1,014.85
|
|
|
|
Subscription Purchase For IT
|
$437.00
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For South Zone Youth Programs
|
$234.85
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For The Heights
|
$514.85
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Alexander Heights Care Centre -
Mainstream Group
|
$509.28
|
|
|
|
Coles Myer Gift Card For Alexander Heights Care Centre -
Italian Group
|
$305.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card
Payments November 2011
|
$14,825.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque
November 2011
|
$14,579,582.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total
(Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees)
|
$14,606,264.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid
- Municipal Fund
|
$18,583,641.06
|
Attachments: Nil
CS02-12/11 Financial
Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2011
File Ref: 5509
– 11/125305
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period
ended 31 October 2011.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government
(Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to
prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according
to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration
has opted to present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and
in a similar format to that presented in the 2011/2012 Annual Budget.
This format separates Revenue and Expenses from Other Revenue and Expenses and
provides improved disclosure of the City’s underlying Operating Result.
The Financial Activity Statement is
in the form of an Income Statement, which compares year to date actual income
and expenses with the year to date budget, shows variances and the adopted and
revised budgets (if any). Revised budget figures are inclusive of endorsed
amendments from Council (including the Mid Year Budget Review). It is
accompanied by a Balance Sheet together with information relating to Capital
Projects, an Investment Portfolio Summary, Statement of Net Current Assets and
Rate Setting Statement.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(5) of the Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local
government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with
Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity
for reporting material variances. For the 2011/2012 financial year
Council has adopted 10% for the reporting of variances, which is in line with
previous years.
Detail
The Financial Activity Statement and October year to date
financial performances of the City are detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3
and 4.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(5) of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the
commentaries on 10% variances to revised budgets in the Financial Activity
Statement for the period ended 31 October 2011 are provided below:
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Net Result $
million
Year to Date Actual 69.647
Year to Date Budget Estimate 61.215
Year to Date Variance +8.432
(+14%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 38.696
Full Year Revised Budget 38.696
The following information is provided on key aspects of
the year to date financial results:
Revenues $
million
Year to Date Actual 102.725
Year to Date Budget Estimate 102.685
Year to Date Variance +0.040
(+0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 133.806
Full Year Revised Budget 133.806
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
Currently Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
reflect an unfavourable variance of 31% (-$0.895 million). As per
previous years, the City received in June 2011 an early payment from the Grants
Commission of its first quarterly instalment for 2011/2012 for $1.306 million
with a subsequent payment of $0.985 million received during October. Also
received in October were $0.159 million and $0.140 million towards the
provision of Financial Counselling Services, plus $0.136 million from FESA for
Emergency Services (fire prevention).
Fees and Charges
Fees and Charges income as at the end of October are behind
year to date budget by14% (-$1.020 million). The
primarily reason for this variance is partly due to the timing of billing
cycles within Waste Operations and the Materials Recovery Facility for Service
Fee Income, which will be monitored over the coming months with any subsequent
adjustments to be determined at Mid Year Review.
Interest Earnings
For the financial year to date ending October,
Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index
benchmark by 0.76% pa (5.77% pa vs. 5.01 % pa). October year to date interest
earnings amounts to $3.564 million reflecting a favourable variance of
$0.931 million (+35%) compared to year to date budget.
The City intends to continue with a “cautiously
optimistic” investment strategy throughout the year and has budgeted for
$7.123 million to be achieved by year end considering the current economic
climate.
Other Revenue
The Other Revenue category shows a favourable year to date
variance to budget of $0.730 million (+54%). The main contributor
towards this variance is the unbudgeted payment of $0.258 million received
by the City for the sale of sand at Lot 15 Motivation Drive Wangara and the
$0.395 million favourable variance in Sale of Products Income for the Materials
Recycling Facility.
Expenses $
million
Year to Date Actual 35.603
Year to Date Budget Estimate 42.421
Year to Date Variance
+6.818 (+16%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 132.686
Full Year Revised Budget 132.686
Employee Costs
Under Employee costs a positive year to date variance of
+17% ($3.004 million) has been reflected for the end of October. The main
contributor towards this is the delay in recruitment for newly created
positions adopted through the recently approved annual budget together with
other vacancies. It is noted that some positions in the current
environment are proving difficult to fill.
In respect to the UCA for inside staff an updated agreement
is still being negotiated. At present favourable variances to year to date
budgets of +$2.083 million and +$0.752 million are reflected for Salaries
and Wages respectively.
Materials and Contracts
Under Materials and Contracts a positive variance to year to
date budget of +22% is represented (+$2.806 million). This is a result of
slower than expected recording of costs to some accounts within this category
for the first four months of the financial year. Material contributors
towards this variance are Contract Expenses (+$1.666 million), Refuse Removal
Expenses (+$0.603 million) and Material Expenses (+0.535 million). As
activities increase over the coming months this variance is expected to reduce,
hence no reductions are identified at this stage.
Utility Charges
The variance to year to date budget for Utility Charges is
currently +13% (+$0.248 million). Most accounts are within budget
expectations except for Electricity which shows a positive variance of +$0.279
million, negated by Water with a negative variance of -$0.046 million, both due
to timing of payments.
Insurance
A positive variance to year to date budget of +18% (+$0.267
million) is noted as at October month end for Insurance costs. The reason
for this variance is from the timing of the payments of the annual premiums,
which are staged over the year and should not result in any savings by year
end.
Other Revenue and Expenses $
million
(Excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Revenue in excess of expenses:
Year to Date Actual 2.526
Year to Date Budget Estimate 0.951
Year to Date Variance +1.575
(+166%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 7.577
Full Year Revised Budget 7.577
Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
An unfavourable year to date budget variance of -56% is
reflected under the Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions category
which relates primarily to Capital Grants for Capital Works, however, no
reductions in the annual estimates are identified. The most material
amounts received during October were, $0.500 million from Department of
Infrastructure and Transport and $0.364 million from Main Roads.
Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Expenses
TPS Expenses as at October month end reflects a +47%
variance (+$3.308 million) to year to date budget. These costs relate to
expenditures for within specific Scheme areas and are funded by contributions
received from land owners. If timings of works carried out change there
will be no impact on Municipal accounts.
Contributions of Physical Assets $
million
Year to Date Actual 0.000
Year to Date Budget Estimate 0.000
Year to Date Variance 0.000
(0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 30.000
Full Year Revised Budget 30.000
Each year Developers hand over physical assets (such as
parklands) to the City, for its ongoing management and control. These
assets can be of considerable value and will be calculated and booked to the
accounts during the preparation of end of year Financial Statements. It
should be noted that variations on the amounts of contributions of physical
assets comparing to budget has no direct impact to the City’s current
financial year financial results.
Balance Sheet (Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program as of 31
October 2011 is summarised below, by Program Category:-
Capital Works Detail by Program
|
Program
Category
Description
|
Annual Revised
Budget
$ million
|
Year to date
Actual
$ million
|
Commitments
$ million
|
|
Community
|
3.828
|
0.492
|
0.419
|
|
Corporate
|
6.361
|
0.267
|
1.569
|
|
Drainage
|
0.659
|
0.130
|
0.012
|
|
Investment
|
4.128
|
0.622
|
0.002
|
|
Recreation and Sport
|
16.647
|
0.832
|
1.713
|
|
Transport
|
35.010
|
8.675
|
4.943
|
|
Waste Management
|
4.185
|
0.221
|
0.664
|
|
Total
|
70.818
|
11.329
|
9.322
|
The table above notes a total Annual Revised Budget for
the Capital Works Program as $70.818 million. As at the end of October
$11.329 million has been spent against capital works which is in line with
expectations at this stage of the financial year. In addition to the
actual expenditure, $9.322 million is recognised as committed. (Note:
Commitments are life to date and will also relate to future financial periods).
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information
above, key projects are selected to be reported on, on a regular basis, which
are listed in the following table:
Capital Works
Details for Selected Projects
Project
Description
|
Annual Revised
Budget
$ million
|
Year to Date
Actual
$ million
|
Commitments $ million
|
Comments
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Wangara
|
10.291
|
4.717
|
2.720
|
Roadworks nearing
completion with practical completion late Dec.
|
|
Flynn Drive Neerabup
|
6.215
|
0.005
|
0.017
|
Design review being
undertaken with MRWA & waiting on ministerial direction in relation to
additional funding.
|
|
Hepburn Avenue
Alexander Heights
|
3.801
|
0.119
|
0.035
|
Stage 2 tender closed
with tender award to be addressed under CEO delegation.
|
|
Upgrade Kingsway RSC
Stage 5
|
3.730
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Stage 5 sports field
redevelopment in progress with soccer, rugby & netball carpark designs
being finalised.
|
|
Pinjar Road Ashby
|
3.719
|
1.184
|
0.477
|
Works currently
focussed on Caporn/Pinjar intersection & progressing according to plan.
|
|
Develop Industrial
Estate Neerabup
|
2.818
|
0.599
|
0.002
|
On hold pending
resolution of environmental issues.
|
|
Joondalup Drive
Carramar
|
2.645
|
1.028
|
0.419
|
Works progressing to
plan with next stage dualling though to Pinjar Rd. Completion scheduled
for Dec
|
|
Replace Waste
Management Plant
|
2.142
|
0.000
|
0.186
|
On track to be
completed by June 30.
|
|
Replace Light Plant
|
2.083
|
0.000
|
0.402
|
Awaiting finalisation
of analysis of log book review.
|
|
Lenore Road Wanneroo
|
1.450
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Design being finalised
with tender advertisement subject to finalisation of land acquisition matters.
|
|
Yanchep District
Playing Fields
|
1.199
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Report to Council
current round. Grant funding being applied for.
|
|
Yanchep Lagoon
|
1.042
|
0.027
|
0.007
|
Design progressing with
approvals being actioned.
|
Investment Portfolio Summary (Refer to Attachment
3)
In accordance with the City’s Investment Policy,
Council endorsed the City to continue maintaining a “cautiously
optimistic” approach to its investments to ensure full protection of the
City’s financial assets. As such, the City will only invest in government
guaranteed products or short to medium term deposits with major banks during
the present economic climate.
As at 31 October 2011, the City holds an investment
portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $217.321 million. Interest Earnings were
budgeted at 5% yield. For the financial year to date ending October,
Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index
benchmark by 0.76% pa (5.77% pa vs. 5.01% pa). Further explanation of the
current economic climate, market conditions and City’s portfolio analysis
is detailed in Attachment 3.
Rate Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4
represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the
movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and
capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
Overall Comment
The Operating Result for the City to October month end
presents an overall positive variance of +11 (+$6.857 million) to year to date
budget. Operating income presented a minimal variance to year to date budget of
less than 1% (+$0.040 million).
Expenditures from Operations continue to present a
favourable variance to year to date budget of +16% (+$6.818 million) with
the major influences being the positive year to date variances generated from
Employee Costs ($3.004 million) and Materials & Contracts ($2.806
million). After a relatively slow start to the financial year, activities
within the capital program have continued to progress from September into
October.
The external audit of the
2010/2011 financials was presented to and endorsed by Council at its 15
November 2011 meeting, with no adjustment required to be reflected in opening
balance of the Rate Setting Statement for the current financial year.
Statutory
Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4
of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4
Governance
4.6 Provide and
maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and
4
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the Financial
Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to Budget for the period
ended 31 October 2011, consisting of:
· Annual
Original and Revised Budgets,
· October
2011 Year to Date Budget Estimates,
· October
2011 Year to Date Income and Expenditures,
· October
2011 Year to Date Material Variance Notes, and
· October
2011 Year to Date Net Current Assets.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Income Statement for the period ended 31 October 2011
|
11/131755
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Balance Sheet 31 October 2011
|
11/132030
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Economic and Investment Portfolio
|
11/131753
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Rate Setting Statement 31 October 2011
|
11/132029
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 13 December, 2011 308
CS03-12/11 Review
of 10 Year Financial Plan
File Ref: 3964
– 11/132805
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a review of the 10 Year Financial Management
Plan.
Background
Wanneroo in the past levied relatively low rates in
comparison with many other Metropolitan Councils, despite experiencing the
challenges imposed by a growth rate consistently around 8% annually.
In 2008, WALGA and eight Perth Metropolitan Growth Councils
engaged Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) to undertake a independent review and
analysis of the rate setting processes and financial strategies for the Outer
Metropolitan Growth Councils of WA, to offer Councils a deeper insight into the
likely impacts of each strategy on long-range financial sustainability.
The review resulted in the preparation of a report (2009) entitled ‘Western
Australian Local Government Association Rate setting processes, funding amenity
and service sustainability of WA outer metropolitan growth councils’.
The conclusion and recommendations stated in the study
were:-
“The Perth outer
metropolitan growth councils are characterised by higher population growth combined
with stronger demand for provision of new infrastructure and extra services
particularly in greenfield areas, to meet the rising needs of their
communities. In this rapidly changing environment, and facing sustainability
challenges not shared by nongrowth Councils, there are a number of significant
challenges facing the Outer Metropolitan Growth Councils in WA. In particular,
the current level of rates generally appears to be insufficient to meet all the
rising community expectations for better services whilst also eliminating the
asset renewal gap of the Councils.
Ultimately, based on recent
trends in cost growth, with most Perth outer metro growth Councils
experiencing real rises in expenditures of 2-5% per annum [over CPI],
Councils will need to increase rates and the level of other user charges by
this same magnitude to retain the current level of financial sustainability.
However, to improve financial sustainability, it is likely that Councils may
require even higher rate increases.
Strategies and best practice
processes need to be adopted in order for growth Councils to respond to
increasing community demands, including:-
· pursue more financial
support to provide infrastructure and service levels whilst also progressively
reducing asset renewal gaps:
· consider asset
rationalisation and divestments, particularly for rundown or under-utilised
assets, to both reduce the total asset renewal gap, to fund progressive
reduction of the remaining gap/or to fund new multi-purpose infrastructure;
· adjust service levels
by actively managing service expectations of residents. Councils could offer
their communities some different levels of service quality linked to different
levels of real rate increases.
In
greenfield areas, community expectations are often driven by developers and
these should be monitored and defined from the inception of a new development
(rather than being debated and service qualities lift post completion of the
development); and
· consider
the steps for better practice rate setting on an annual and on-going basis in
order to better set benchmarks and targets for long-term financial
performance.”
The steps of best practice rate
setting incorporate:
1. Establish the opening position
2. Create/review service standards
3. Establish expenditure estimates
4. Determine asset renewal levels
5. Set fees and charges
6. Establish non-rate revenue
7. Determine financing options
8. Establish proposed rate levels
9. Consider ratepayer capacity to pay
10. Overall considerations
As part of the budget development
process for 2009/10, Council adopted a series of Budget Principles designed to
provide clear guidance for the preparation of the Budget and proposed 10 Year
Financial plan. The Principles outlined an approach to ensure that the
Financial Plan was developed on a highly prudent basis, thus ensuring the City
could achieve an appropriate degree of financial sustainability.
In
recognition of the ongoing requirement for sound financial stewardship, the
following Budget Principles were reaffirmed (with minor amendment) by Council
in March 2010 and again at its meeting held on
Tuesday, 8 March 2011 (CS01-03/11), to guide the Annual Budget Development
Process for 2011/2012 and review of the 10 Year Strategic Financial Management
Plan 2011/2012 to 2020/2021:
“a) The budget shall be prepared
consistent with the Best Practice Rating Strategy as detailed in the PWC
report;
b) The aim is to achieve a
‘balanced’ operating budget (Improved actual performance will
enhance the closing position);
c) Extraordinary income (such as
proceeds from sale of land) shall not be used as a source of funds in the same
financial year as it is proposed to be received. (Funds will be deposited in a
Reserve to be called on in subsequent years);
d) The budgeted income for Investments
shall be based on an average market return as measured against the UBS Warburg
90 Day Bank Bill Index and/or the Cash Rate (unless a higher level is certain);
e) The rate setting strategy for the
next ten financial years be based on a rate in the dollar increase of CPI plus
3-6% (with growth factored in at 4%) as supported by the Price Waterhouse
Coopers report “Western Australian Local Government Association Rate
setting processes, funding amenity and service sustainability of WA outer
metropolitan growth councils”;
f) The adoption of the
‘expenditure by category’ table to reflect the Municipal funding
capacity;
g) Explore opportunities to increase the
level of commercial return from facilities through broadening the range of
products and services provided; and
h) In developing each successive annual
budget, opportunities will be explored to achieve operational efficiencies
across the organisation.”
Detail
As a result of consistently implementing the Budget
Principles over the past three budget cycles the ‘average rate’
imposed by the City is now closely aligned to the Metropolitan Median. This has
progressively increased the level of operating income to a more sustainable
level in context with the level of operating expenditure. As a result,
the 2011/12 Budget reflects for the first time, an Operating Surplus, which is
now a trend that extends throughout the 10 Year Financial Management Plan
(Financial Plan) to 2020/21.
The following table demonstrates the steady improvement in
the annual budget and more importantly, the operating result over recent
years.
The Council Report dated 3 June
2011 dealing with the adoption of the Annual 2011/12 Budget included the
following comment:
“In
developing the 2011/12 Budget, consideration has been given to the evolving
wider economic climate, which is mainly driven by the rising Australian dollar
and commodity prices, impacts of the flooding in Queensland and Victoria as
well as global concerns about sovereign creditworthiness in Europe.
Overall however, a cautiously optimistic approach has been taken in forecasting
activity levels for Wanneroo. Importantly, a growth factor of 5% is embedded
throughout the budget.”
Whilst there were still uncertainties regarding the economic
climate at the time of preparing the 2011/12 Budget, which indeed is still the
case in respect to the international markets, domestically it is recognised
that growth can be maintained in Wanneroo.
Currently, two key growth factors are included in the
Financial Plan are:
• 6.9%
rate increases factored in for next 4 years (then reduced)
• 5%
growth for 2012/13 then 4% for next 9 years
However to date, the Financial Plan excludes the following:
• TPRC
‘dividend’ (due to commence 2013/14)
• Substantial
capital proceeds from sale of other investment land (only $9m currently)
• Impact
of new Building Act (likely negative impact on Operating Result)
• Carbon
price
• Community
Facilities Plan and Development Contribution Plan
The experience through the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has
provided some assurance in terms of how the Wanneroo region will continue to
grow. This, plus other positive financial initiatives, provides the
opportunity to review the assumptions embedded in the Financial Plan.
Whilst maintaining the Budget Principles, the 10 Year
Financial Plan has been reviewed to incorporate the following:
· Forecast
rate increases have been reduced down to 5.9% with an aim that the Budget
Principle be amended to reflect a reduction in the range from the currently
adopted 3-6% above CPI down to 2-3% above CPI (assuming CPI of 3%);
· growth
in the rate base has been adjusted to reflect recent outcomes (still
conservative/prudent but delivering a slight increase over the next four
financial years)
· employee
costs adjusted to reflect:
o an increase in the
establishment to meet current shortfall
o establishment growth in
2012/13 limited to 1% (down from 3%)
o an increase in the
establishment in 2015/16
o adjustment down of the
annual salary incremental growth applicable through collective agreements.
· Brought
into account the scheduled proceeds from Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC).
Consultation
The Budget Principles have been formulated in consultation
with Council and Elected Members were provided a presentation on the improving
financial position at the recent Council Forum.
Comment
There literally is no other local government in Western
Australia that faces the extent of challenges as confront the City of Wanneroo,
however, Council has faced up to the responsibility and can now have confidence
in being able to maintain an appropriate level of financial
sustainability. Over the last three budget cycles, the City’s finances
have continued to improve as a direct result of the Budget Principles that were
adopted in 2009 and other initiatives which insulated the City from the worst
of the GFC effects. This has been achieved through:
· cautious
and prudent budgeting
· tight
controls and constraint and a willingness to adjust service levels in line with
funding capacity
· strategic
scheduling of capital works that recognises the financial and resourcing
requirements available
· long
term planning and an integrated model that identifies the available funding and
rate setting requirements over the term of the Plan
As a result, the City is now in a significantly better
position than it was pre 2009, not only in respect to its annual funding
capacity, but also the Reserve balances that have started to be
accumulated.
The reviewed 10 Year Financial Plan (Attachment 1)
therefore depicts the latest forecast and assumptions that will influence
budget considerations in subsequent years. The key movements in the
Financial Plan are:
· an
increase to Employee Costs in the current financial year with flow-on impact
throughout the Financial Plan;
· a
reduction in rate increases, which have been partially offset by an increased
growth factor; and
· increase
in other income (proceeds from TPRC land sales).
Notwithstanding the above changes, the Financial Plan
maintains an Operating Surplus throughout the 10 year cycle.
Statutory
Compliance
N/A
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.4 Maintain
long-term financial stability”
Policy
Implications
N/A
Financial
Implications
Whilst the Financial Plan is reflecting an increase in the
employee costs for the current financial year to reflect proposed additional
positions being recruited, due to existing vacancies and recruitment timetable,
it is unlikely the adopted budget will be exceeded. However there will be
a full year impact on each successive year which has been identified throughout
the Financial Plan.
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
ENDORSES the revised 10 Year Financial Management Plan 2011/12
– 2020/21; and
2.
NOTES a further report will be provided during the lead up to the
2012/13 budget to consider amendments to the Guiding Budget Principles.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
10 Year Financial Plan - Attachment
|
11/137032
|
|
Governance and Executive Services
CS04-12/11 Annual
Review of Delegated Authority Register
File Ref: 2883
– 11/125633
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider amendments to the City’s Delegated
Authority Register, following a review as required by the Local Government
Act 1995 (the Act).
Background
The Act provides for the delegation of certain powers and
duties to the Chief Executive Officer (sections 5.42 and 5.43). The Chief
Executive Officer may, unless prohibited by Council’s instrument of
delegation, further on-delegate powers and duties to employees (Section
5.44). The purpose of delegating authority to the Chief Executive Officer
is to provide for the efficient administration of the day to day functions of
the local government.
The Act requires that a Delegations Register be maintained
and reviewed on an annual basis (Section 5.46).
Detail
It is necessary to review all current delegations to ensure
that they are consistent with the legislation and applicable to current
needs. Although the provisions of the Act do not affect the delegations
made under other legislation, it is considered appropriate to review those
delegations at the same time.
Attachment 1 details those delegations that
have changed. The complete register inclusive of changes is available in
the Elected Members Reading Room and on the Members Web Portal.
Consultation
All Directorates have reviewed the delegations applicable to
their officers. In undertaking this review, Directorates have been
requested to pay particular attention to any new delegations that may be
required as a result of the introduction of new legislation or changes to
existing legislation, and to the requirements of Council’s recently
adopted Execution of Council Documents Policy.
An update on the review process was also presented to the
Council Forum on 22 November 2011.
Comment
A summary of the amendments included in the reviewed
Delegated Authority Register is as follows:
|
Delegation No
|
Delegation
Title
|
Details of
Amendment
|
|
All
|
All
|
Disclaimer added “This text is provided as a
reference only. Delegates shall only act in full understanding of the
delegated statutory power, inclusive of conditions [see below].”
|
|
1.14
|
Disposing of Property (Private Treaty)
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended to extend delegation to
CEO.
|
|
2.1
|
Expenses May be Funded Before Actually Incurred (Elected
Members or Committee Members)
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended by deleting reference to
superseded policies and replacing with reference to current policy.
|
|
2.2
|
Training, Travel and Accommodation – Elected Members
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended by deleting reference to
superseded policies and replacing with reference to current policy.
|
|
2.3
|
Legal Representation – Elected Members and Officers
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended to clarify that
delegation can only be exercised where legal costs do not exceed $10,000 per
application.
|
|
3.1
|
Payments from the Municipal Fund and Trust Fund
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended by adding reference to
Accounting Policy.
|
|
5.3
|
Requirement to Construct and Repair Crossing
|
Delegation to Manager Infrastructure Projects deleted, as
crossing upgrades are generally dealt with by Infrastructure Maintenance.
|
|
6.1
|
Determining that Tenders do not have to be Invited for the
Supply of Goods and Services
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended by adding reference to
Purchasing Policy.
|
|
6.2
|
Tenders to be Invited for Certain Contracts
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended by adding reference to
Purchasing Policy.
|
|
6.4
|
Choice of Most Advantageous Tender
|
Conditions and Exceptions amended to clarify limits
relating to the exercise of this delegation.
|
|
8.3
|
Approve a Demolition Licence Other than for Buildings
Classified by the National Trust and Council’s Heritage Register
|
Amended to reflect the fact that proposals to demolish
places listed on the State Register of Heritage Places must be referred to the
Heritage Council of WA.
|
|
9.1
|
Structure Planning
|
Delegation to Manager City Growth and Manager Planning
Implementation deleted. Various amendments made to Conditions and
Exceptions.
|
|
9.3
|
Development Control
|
Function relating to entry of premises under clause 8.6 of
DPS 2 deleted. Conditions and Exceptions amended in e).
|
|
10.13
|
Private Property Local Law – Approvals, Consents and
Consignments
|
Function relating to consignment of streets numbers
deleted.
|
|
13.1
|
Authority for CEO to Call and Award Tenders –
Kingsway Netball Facilities Upgrade Project
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.3
|
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Project Status and
Future Staged Implementation
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.4
|
Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Facilities, Roundabout,
Intersection Upgrade and Associated Road Widenings (Tumbleweed Drive –
Old Yanchep Road), Banksia Grove
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.5
|
Tenders for Additional Waste Trucks
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.6
|
Local Structure Plan No. 82 - Eglinton
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.7
|
Appointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer (for Periods
of 35 Days or Less)
|
Moved to Part 2 – Administration. Now
Delegation 2.6.
|
|
13.11
|
Approval of Development Application – Community
Recreation Centre, Restaurant and Retail Outlets on Portion of Lot 9004
(2650) Marmion Avenue, Alkimos
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.12
|
Development Applications – Bulk Earthworks and Other
Developments at Lot 609 Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep
|
Deleted. Action completed.
|
|
13.13
|
Appointment of Authorised Persons to Execute Documents on
Behalf of Council
|
Moved to Part 2 – Administration. Now Delegation 2.7
|
|
13.15
|
Applications for Use of Land Under Section 18 of the
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972
|
Moved to Part 7 – Other Legislation. Now
Delegation 7.14.
|
|
13.5
|
Offers to Claimants at Lot 6 (359) Gnangara Road Wangara,
Lot 250 (560) Flynn Drive, Neerabup and Lot 101 (8) Becher Way, Gnangara
|
Delegation added. Inadvertently missed after Council
meeting on 26 July 2011.
|
|
13.6
|
Offers to Claimants at Lot 4 (150) East Road, Pearsall,
Lot 28 (171) Elliott Road, Wanneroo and Lot 3 (185) Mary Street, Wanneroo
|
Delegation added. Inadvertently missed after Council
meeting on 23 August 2011.
|
|
13.7
|
Disposal of Lot 12 Fowey Loop, Mindarie
|
Delegation added. Inadvertently missed after Council
meeting on 11 October 2011.
|
Delegations have been renumbered as necessary as a result of
the amendments listed above.
Statutory
Compliance
The annual review of the City’s Delegated Authority
Register has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of Sections
5.42-5.46 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
A number of policies adopted by Council have clauses
enabling delegation to the Chief Executive Officer, who may in turn on-delegate
to other appointed officers.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. CONSIDER
the review of the Delegated Authority Register conducted by the Chief Executive
Officer; and
2. DELEGATE
by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY all Instruments of Delegation as detailed in the Delegated
Authority Register (Attachment 1).
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Reviewed Delegations
|
11/135863
|
|
CS05-12/11 Delegation
of Authority Over the Council Recess
File Ref: 2883
– 11/128036
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider an increase in the delegated authority provided
to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders during the Council recess
period for any tenders that are above the current delegation limit of $250,000
and the authority to approve a lease arrangement between the City of Wanneroo
and the Department of Education.
Background
Nil
Detail
The last Ordinary Council meeting for 2011 is scheduled for
13 December 2011 and the next meeting will be held on 7 February 2012.
Should a decision be required during the period of recess that does not require
an Absolute or Special Majority under the Local Government Act 1995 or
any other act empowering the local government, then under delegation 2.5 in the
Delegated Authority Register the Chief Executive Officer is authorised to make
decisions in consultation with the Mayor or in the Mayor’s absence the
Deputy Mayor on behalf of the City.
Decisions taken during the recess period will be documented
and reported to the first Ordinary Council meeting in 2012.
During this period at least three tenders will close and for
operational reasons it would be advantageous to award the tender as soon as
possible. It is possible that the value of the following tenders will
exceed the current delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award
tenders to a maximum of $250,000.
· Tender
01142 – Development of Jimbub Swamp Park, Tapping;
· Tender
01143 – Provision of Legal Services (Panel Contract) for a period of five
(5) years; and
· Tender
01144 – Provision of Legal Services by a Barrister (Panel Contract) for a
period of five (5) years.
In order to facilitate the awarding of these tenders, it is
recommended that Council approve an increase in the authority to award tenders
by the Chief Executive Officer during this period.
In addition the Chief Executive Officer may be required to approve
a lease arrangement between the City of Wanneroo and the Department of
Education for the Koondoola Kindergarten facility, with the lease arrangement
expected to commence by 1 January 2011.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
This is a common procedure that is provided for in most
local governments, and has been supported by Council in previous years.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows
Council to delegate functions to the Chief Executive Officer. Section
5.43 does not permit Council to delegate authority to the Chief Executive
Officer to award a tender above a limit set by Council.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The awarding of any tender will be on the basis that
adequate budget provision has been made.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. DELEGATE BY ABSOLUTE
MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer during Councils
recess period being from 13 December 2011 to 7 February 2012:-
a) The
authority to DETERMINE the following tenders up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per
tender in accordance with the Local Government (Functions and General)
Regulations 1996 (in addition to the current delegated authority to
the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders to a maximum of $250,000):-
i) Tender
01142 – Development of Jimbub Swamp Park, Tapping;
ii) Tender
01143 – Provision of Legal Services (Panel Contract) for a period of five
(5) years; and
iii) Tender
01144 – Provision of Legal Services by a Barrister (Panel Contract) for a
period of five (5) years; and
b) The authority
to APPROVE a lease arrangement between the City of Wanneroo and the Department
of Education for the Koondoola Kindergarten facility.
2. NOTES
that the delegation in 1. a) iii) may be on delegated to the Director Corporate
Strategy & Performance due to a potential impartiality interest with the
Chief Executive Officer.
3. AUTHORISES
the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City
of Wanneroo to and execute the Lease between the City and the Department of
Education.
Attachments: Nil
CS06-12/11 Proposed
Additional Ordinary Council Meeting in February 2012
File Ref: 2374
– 11/135912
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider calling an additional Ordinary Council Meeting
on 21 February 2012.
Background
On 11th October 2011 Council adopted their meeting dates for
2012 according to its usual weekly meeting cycle being:
a) Week
One - Briefing Session;
b) Week
Two - Council Meeting;
c) Week
Three - Council Forum and/or Audit Committee meeting;
d) Week
Four - Council Forum, budget meetings, advisory committee/working group
meetings and other policy and procedural reviews.
Detail
The Executive Management Team, due to the volume of matters
listed for presentation to the 13 December 2011 Council meeting, have deferred
a number of reports to the first Council meeting in the new year, however this
will once again result in a demanding agenda for that meeting as well. It
is therefore proposed to schedule an additional Council Meeting for early next
year and advertise accordingly.
It is intended that deferred reports from the December 2011
meeting and new reports, where the subject matter has not previously been
considered at a Council Forum be presented to the first meeting of Council in
the new year being 7 February 2012. Members would have the benefit of a
briefing session to request clarification on items intended for the Council
meeting if necessary.
Administration would then recommend that deferred and new
reports where the subject matter has previously been considered at a Council
Forum be presented to the new proposed Ordinary Council Meeting on 21 February
2012 (the previously scheduled Forum will be cancelled).
This time line will still allow the Council Forum on 14
February 2012 to proceed as there are a number of items listed, some of which
were postponed from the 29 November 2011 Council Forum.
Statutory
Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 2 – Council meetings, committees and their
meetings and electors’ meetings
S5.3 – Ordinary and special council meetings
“(1) A
council is to hold ordinary meetings and may hold special meetings.
(2) Ordinary
meetings are to be held not more than 3 months apart.
(3) If
a council fails to meet as required by subsection (2) the CEO is to notify the
Minister of that failure.”
Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996
R12 – Public notice of council or committee meetings
– s. 5.25(1)(g)
“(1) At
least once each year a local government is to give local public notice of the
dates on which and the time and place at which –
(a) the
ordinary council meetings; and
(b) the
committee meetings that are required under the Act to be open to members of the
public or that are proposed to be open to members of the public,
are to be held in the next 12
months.
(2) A
local government is to give local public notice of any change to the date, time
or place of a meeting referred to in sub regulation (1).”
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The cost of calling an additional Ordinary Council meeting.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the calling of an additional
Ordinary Council meeting to be held on 21 February 2012 and undertake local
public advertising accordingly.
Attachments: Nil
CS07-12/11 Donations
to be Considered by Council - December 2011
File Ref: 2410
– 11/130496
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver
of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver
of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and
Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy requires applications over $500 from
individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a
report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications
of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the City’s
Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00
per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the
amount provided is $500.00 per individual, capped at $1,500.00 per team.
Schools are capped at $2,000 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received two sponsorship
requests and one donation request which are summarised as follows. Copies of
the full applications are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship
Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Shona McDiarmid Dance School
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Alicia Spyvee, Alissa Whyte and Anthea Panagiotidis
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Showcase 2012 National Dance Championships, Gold Coast
Qld 17 - 23 January 2012
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National $200 each
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for national
events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per
team).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$600.00 to Shona McDiarmid Dance School for the participation of Alicia
Spyvee, Alissa Whyte and Anthea Pangiotidis in the Showcase 2012 National
Dance Championships to be held in the Gold Coast Qld from 17 – 23
January 2012.
|
|
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
Applicant 2 – Western Australian Indoor
Netball Association (U14s)
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Ashleigh Littlejohn, Aleasha Bennett and Kelsey Harris
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Indoor Netball Junior Nationals, Adelaide SA, 27
November – 3 December 2011
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National $200 each
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for national
events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per
team).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$600.00 to Western Australian Indoor Netball Association for the participation
of Ashleigh Littlejohn, Aleasha Bennett and Kelsey Harris in the Indoor
Netball Junior Nationals to be held in Adelaide SA from 27 November to 3
December 2011.
|
|
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
Community
Group Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Yanchep & Districts
CWA of WA
|
|
Request amount
|
$597.00
|
|
Description of request
|
Donation to assist with the cost of catering and
advertising for a Friendship Day to be held at the Phil Renkin Centre, Two
Rocks on 21 March 2012
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Nil
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Not for Profit
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to all
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies,
values and strategic direction
|
This request supports Objective 2.2 of Council’s
Strategic Plan being “Improve the City’s identity and
community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.”
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
Nil
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
$230.00 plus in-kind $1,260 (104 hrs)
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
$573 CS09-06/10 for International Day at Phil Renkin
Centre, Two Rocks
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Comments
|
Nil
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a donation of $597.00 to the Yanchep and
Districts Country Women’s Association to assist with the cost of
catering and advertising for a Friendship Day to be held at the Phil Renkin
Centre, Two Rocks on 21 March 2012.
|
|
Reason
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
The City of Wanneroo Donations,
Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy states that sponsorship
applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per
team and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International events
will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school
per financial year.
Financial
Implications
|
Budget 2011/2012
|
|
$80 000.00
|
|
Amount expended to date (as at 24 November 2011)
|
|
$28,610.35
|
|
Balance
|
|
$51,389.65
|
|
Total of requests for this round:
Donations (in this report):
Total this Round
|
$1,797.00
|
$1,797.00
|
|
CARRY FORWARD
|
|
$49,592.65
|
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVE
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Shona McDiarmid Dance School
for the participation of Alicia Spyvee, Alissa Whyte and
Anthea Pangiotidis in the Showcase 2012 National Dance Championships to be
held in the Gold Coast Qld from 17 – 23 January 2012;
2. APPROVE
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Western Australian Indoor
Netball Association for the participation of Ashleigh Littlejohn,
Aleasha Bennett and Kelsey Harris in the Indoor Netball Junior Nationals
to be held in Adelaide SA from 27 November to 3 December 2011; and
3. APPROVE
a donation of $597.00 to the Yanchep and Districts Country Women’s
Association to assist with the cost of catering and advertising for a
Friendship Day to be held at the Phil Renkin Centre, Two Rocks on 21 March
2012.
Attachments: Nil
CS08-12/11 Consideration
of Motions presented at the Annual General Meeting of Electors
File Ref: 5153
– 11/138276
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
To be circulated under separate cover.
Property
CS09-12/11 Proposed
Sale of Portion of Lot 506 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo
File Ref: 2374
– 11/131657
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the sale of portion of Lot 506 Rocca Way,
Wanneroo to Edith Cowan University (ECU) in the amount of $1,970,800 plus GST
(sale price) for the purpose of establishing a GP Super Clinic (purpose).
Background
The City owns Lot 506 Rocca Way, Wanneroo in freehold under
Certificate of Title Volume 2517 Folio 671. Part of Lot 506 accommodates
the Wanneroo Library & Cultural Centre (WLCC) with the remaining portion
consisting of mostly undeveloped land and a small car park containing 25 bays (Attachment
1 refers).
Negotiations between
Administration and ECU for the sale of the 3032m² (approximately –
subject to survey) undeveloped portion of Lot 506 have been in progress for
some time and Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 11 October 2011 (CR05-10/11
refers) resolved, in part, as follows:
“That Council:-
1. NOTES
and supports in principle the disposition of a 3032m²
portion of Lot 506 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo to Edith Cowan University for the
purpose of developing a GP Super Clinic;
2. AUTHORISES
the Chief Executive Officer to publish a local public notice of its intention
to dispose of portion of Lot 506 in accordance with the requirements of section
3.58(3) of the Local Government Act 1995;
3. NOTES
that a further report will be presented to Council at the conclusion of the two
week public notice period in 2, above;”
Detail
Sections 3.58(3) and 3.58(4) of the Local Government Act
1995 provide that before a local government can dispose of property other
than by public auction or by tender that it must give a local public notice of
the details of the proposed disposition and invite submissions that are to be
received during the public notice period.
A notice was advertised in the Wanneroo Times on 18 October
2011 detailing the proposal to sell portion of Lot 506 to ECU for $1,970,800
(plus GST) and inviting submissions which were to be received by 4.30pm on
Tuesday, 1 November 2011. No submissions were received.
Conditional approval was granted by the Western Australian
Planning Commission (WAPC) to the subdivision of Lot 506 in December 2010 and
power has now been connected to the site and Western Power conditions have been
cleared. Water Corporation has connected water and sewer, however, the
City is still awaiting clearance.
A further significant condition which remains with the
City’s Director Planning & Sustainability for clearance is in
relation to replacement of the 25 parking bays currently on the site for use by
Wanneroo Library & Cultural Centre (WLCC). Discussions have been held
with ECU in relation to the capacity to provide the required number of parking
onsite to accommodate both use requirements of ECU and to replace the 25 bays
provided on site by the City to accommodate the City’s employees and
visitors to the WLCC.
At this stage ECU has indicated a capacity to provide all
the necessary parking within the development of the GP Super Clinic, however,
that will ultimately be subject to the outcome of its Development
Application. Accordingly, it is proposed that the sale will be
conditional on ECU agreeing to provide the 25 WLCC bays and a licence to the
City for use of those bays exclusively or, at the election of the City, either
a Parking In Lieu Contribution in the event the 25 parking bays cannot be
provided within the GP Super Clinic facility or provision of the 25 bays
elsewhere to be nominated by the City.
Once all of the clearances have been obtained the Deposited
Plan (DP) 66852 can be lodged at Landgate for approval. When the DP is
‘in order for dealings’ the City will then be in a position to
apply for the issue of new Certificates of Title for both the WLCC and the
balance lot for sale to ECU. Formal contract of sale documentation also
needs to be agreed and executed between the parties for the sale to proceed to
settlement by 31 January 2012 to satisfy the requirements of ECU’s
federal funding for the project.
Consultation
A local public notice of the proposed disposition was given
in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 with
public submissions invited until 4.30pm on Tuesday 1 November 2011.
Comment
The sale to ECU is supported and
is considered the best option for both the City and ECU based on the following
reasons:
i) Activation
of Dundebar Road and the Wanneroo Town Centre
ii) Increased
diversity of activities within the Town Centre
iii) Proximity
to Wanneroo Central Shopping Centre and the Wanneroo Community Centre
iv) The
offer meets the market valuation
v) Provides
access to a medical facility to the local community.
As the agreement to sell the land has only been considered
due to the associated GP Super Clinic development the sale is to be conditional
on ECU using the site for the purpose and there will be milestones to be met in
this regard by ECU and failing which ECU will be required to transfer the land
back to the City for the sale price less any remediation costs to return the
site to its original state.
Statutory
Compliance
The advertising of the proposed disposition is in accordance
with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.1 Improve
strategic partnerships”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The 2011/12 Budget has a provision of $4.7 million for the
sale of land which includes portion of Lot 506.
The sale to ECU will provide an income stream to the City of
$1,970,800, which is in line with the independent market valuation and the
funds are to be deposited into the Asset Replacement Reserve for application
towards appropriate capital acquisition projects.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES
that no submissions or comments were received in response to the local public
notice placed in the Wanneroo Times on 18 October 2011 outlining the details of
the proposed sale to Edith Cowan University of portion of Lot 506 Rocca Way,
Wanneroo;
2. APPROVES
the sale of a 3032m² (subject to survey) portion of Lot 506
Rocca Way, Wanneroo to Edith Cowan University for the agreed sum of $650/m2
($1,970,800 plus GST) subject to the contract of sale providing the
following conditions:
a) Prescribing a requirement
for Edith Cowan University to fund the provision of 25 parking bays by:
i) In
the first priority providing the bays on site; or
ii) Provision
of parking in lieu at the rate of $2,850 (plus GST) per bay.
b) Entering into an
exclusive licence for access and use of the 25 parking bays allocated for use
by patrons and staff of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre; and
c) In the event that
the GP Super Clinic does not proceed to construction or in compliance with
milestones agreed, the site will be transferred to the City at the sale price
less remediation costs.
3. NOTES
that the terms of Edith Cowan University’s federal funding require the
land transaction to be concluded by 31 January 2012; and
4. AUTHORISES
the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate, affix the Common Seal of
the City of Wanneroo to and sign a formal Contract of Sale between the City and
Edith Cowan University and any other associated documentation including an
exclusive licence, any application for new title and Transfer of Land documents
required to effect the sale in 2. above.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Subdivision Plan - Lot 506 Rocca Way, Wanneroo -
Proposed Sale to ECU
|
11/110111
|
|
CS10-12/11 Proposal
to Create a New Locality Named 'Catalina'
File Ref: 2074
– 11/128963
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a request from Tamala Park Regional Council
(TPRC) proposing the creation of a new locality named ‘Catalina’
for an area that currently is located within part of Clarkson and Tamala Park
Localities (Attachment 1 refers).
Background
A request from the TPRC was received by the City on 18 July
2011 stating that at its meeting of 23 June 2011 the TPRC Council resolved to
“request the City of Wanneroo to initiate the renaming of that part of
the Clarkson locality within the Tamala Park Project (generally bounded by
Mitchell Freeway, Neerabup Road, Marmion Avenue and the Tamala Park Landfill
site) to ‘Catalina’.”
The TPRC will be utilising ‘Catalina’ as the
estate name for the ‘Tamala Park Project’ currently being developed
by Satterley Property Group (Development Managers) on behalf of the TPRC.
The proposed locality of ‘Catalina’ forms part of the ‘Tamala
Park Project’, between Marmion Avenue, Neerabup Road and the Mitchell
Freeway as indicated on the Tamala Park Local Structure Plan map (Attachment
2 refers).
The portion of the ‘Tamala Park Project’ which
falls within the Locality of Mindarie is not part of this proposal.
The applicant has given the following reasons for selection
of the name ‘Catalina’:
“Catalina was selected as
part of the historical element for Western Australia. The Catalina flying
boats were operated by the RAAF in WA and flew over this section of the WA
coast. Whilst there are no records of the Catalina flying boats landing
in this particular location, the Catalina flying boats still have a strong
association with WA.”
The TPRC believes that the renaming of this portion of
Clarkson and Tamala Park Suburbs will have significant benefit to the
‘Tamala Park Project’.
Detail
Names for new localities or changes of names are required to
conform to the principles, Guidelines and procedures set out by the Geographic
Names Committee of Western Australia (GNC), and it is the GNC’s role to
approve or reject such proposals in consultation with the local authority.
The table below outlines the GNC’s guidelines for new
locality names or renaming proposals, together with Administrations comments on
the assessment of the request:
|
GNC Guidelines
|
Administration’s Assessment Comments
|
|
Minimum size of urban localities to be 100ha, minimum
number of available lots to be 1000 and maximum to be 10,000, ideal size to
be approximately 500ha
|
The portion of Clarkson and Tamala Park subject to the
proposal covers an area of approximately 148 ha and proposed number of lots
in excess of 1000 lots.
|
|
Boundaries to be established in accordance with major
highways, divided carriageways, other roads, railways.
|
The Northern Boundary is defined by the centreline of
Neerabup Road, the Western Boundary is defined by the centreline of Marmion
Avenue, the Eastern Boundary is defined by the centreline of the Mitchell
Freeway and the Southern Boundary is within the locality of Tamala Park
locality and will require realignment in conjunction with future development.
|
|
Names for the new localities or changes of names to
preferably have an Australian emphasis and to be selected from the following
categories
a) Names
associated with the area: aboriginal – feature or descriptive name,
pioneer settler of the area, early property name.
b) Names
associated with the development of the state; statesman or former politician,
other eg ship, event, etc
c) Other
choice of name: flora or fauna association.
d) Localities
may not be named in honour of someone still living
|
‘Catalina’ was an American and Canadian built
flying boat of the 1930’s and 1940s.
About 3300 Catalina’s were produced and several are
still flying today.
The Catalina performed a significant role in
Australia’s defence in World War II and Rathmines, NSW was then the
world’s biggest flying boat base.
There are no records of the Catalina flying boats landing
in the proposed location.
|
|
The proposal is supported by a broad-based community
survey indicating very strong community support for the name change
|
Not yet determined
|
|
The proposal is to rename all or part of a locality before
urban development occurs.
|
Development has not yet occurred on the subject land
however marketing and Estate signage have been approved for the site.
|
|
The proposal is based on a locality being divided by a
newly constructed major road or railway.
|
Not applicable
|
|
The current name can be easily confused with another name,
has mail delivery or emergency services problems
|
The City is not aware of these sorts of issues occurring
anywhere in Clarkson or Tamala Park.
|
|
The proposed name has a long-standing association with the
locality
|
The proposed name has no association with the location or
surrounding areas.
|
|
The proposal is based on a change to local government
boundaries
|
Not applicable
|
In addition, the Principles, Guidelines and Procedures of
GNC provide the following guidelines –
“Furthermore, renaming
proposals submitted to the GNC, which conform to the guidelines outlined above,
are unlikely to succeed if: -
· The
proposal seeks to adopt a developer’s inappropriate name coined to
promote a development.
· The
proposed name has no relationship to the area or is a made up name.
· The
proposed name is duplicated or similar spelling or sound to an existing Western
Australian town or locality name.
· Petitions
presented in support only present one point of view.
· The
proposal does not have strong local community support.”
It should also be noted that the
Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4819:2011 ‘Rural and urban
addressing’, Section 3.2.2 states that ‘A locality name shall not
be duplicated within the country’. There is a locality called ‘Catalina’
that exists in New South Wales.
Consultation
Comments were requested from the
Geographic Names Section of Landgate.
In response the City was advised
the following:
· The
area is well under the ideal size for a locality (500ha)
· It
is considered more appropriate to rationalise the locality boundaries by
amalgamating the subject site with the portion of Tamala Park east of Marmion
Avenue, to become part of the locality with which the subject site is already
associated with – Tamala Park. Alternatively the Eastern side could
be included in Clarkson with the western side of Tamala Park being included in
Mindarie.
· ‘Catalina’
could be considered to be unacceptable as a locality name because the name
would not be unique within Australia (Catalina NSW) furthermore the name is an
‘estate name’ and as such is non-compliant.
With any potential changes to locality boundaries of this
nature it should be noted that the City would be required to undertake
consultation with the community/residents and other interest groups (including
Australia Post) to give the broader community an opportunity to comment as well
as a chance to forward other names for consideration should the City wish to
consider new locality names
Comment
The City is required to assess
any naming proposals against the GNC Principles, Guidelines and Procedures
prior to submitting a request to the GNC for consideration. The TPRC proposes
to adopt the marketing estate name for that part of the development which falls
within Clarkson and Tamala Park, the proposed suburb is not the ideal size and
the name is not a unique locality name as there is a Locality within NSW called
‘Catalina’. Therefore administration does not support the
proposal on the basis that it does not conform to the GNC’s guidelines.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 26 of the Land Administration Act 1997
empowers the Geographic Names Committee, representing the Minister of Lands to
assign names to places, to investigate and determine the form, spelling,
meaning and pronunciation, origin and history of any geographical name and the
application of such name with regard to position, extent or otherwise.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES
NOT SUPPORT the proposal to create a new locality named ‘Catalina’,
consisting of that portion of Clarkson and Tamala Park marketed as
‘Catalina Estate’; and
2. AUTHORISES
Administration to write to the Tamala Park Regional Council advising of the
outcome of their request.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Proposed Catalina Locality
|
11/129152
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Tamala Park LSP Map from WAPC
|
11/129102
|
|
CS11-12/11 Proposed
Lease to Youth Futures WA (Inc) - Portion of Clarkson Youth Centre
File Ref: 5583
– 11/131448
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider leasing a portion of the Clarkson Youth Centre,
59 Key Largo Drive, Clarkson to Youth Futures WA (Inc).
Background
The Clarkson Youth Centre (the Centre) is situated on Crown
Reserve 44537, and is vested to the City under a Management Order, for the
purpose of “Community Purposes” with the power to lease or licence.
The City currently leases an 8.5m² office space portion
of the Centre to Joondalup Youth Support Services (Inc) for a term of 2 years (Attachment
1 refers) and that lease is due to expire on 31 December 2011.
In September 2010 Joondalup Youth Support Services (Inc) – (JYSS)
registered a change of name under the Associations Incorporation Act 1987
to Youth Futures WA (Inc) (Youth Futures).
Youth Futures, under its
Constitution, continues to operate under the same objects as JYSS which include
but are not limited to:
“a) to make
available the information, practical assistance and contact with community
resources to assist young people to re-establish links with their families and
their communities;
b) to provide a
supportive environment in which people utilising the services offered by the
Association are encouraged and assisted to make decisions about their future
through educative processes, raised awareness, new opportunities, skill
development and mutual support;
c) to improve the
status of at risk young people, especially those who are homeless and/or
disengaged from family and community, through a collaborative approach with
Government and community organisations.”
Detail
Youth Futures has sought an extension of their current lease
arrangement for a further two (2) years expiring 31 December 2013.
Given Youth Futures is grant funded and therefore under the
City’s Tenancy Policy is considered as ‘Government’ which
means the terms of the lease are negotiable.
A formal lease proposal was
forwarded to Youth Futures and the essential terms of the proposed lease have
been agreed, subject to Council approval and the consent of the Minister for
Lands, as follows:
|
Leased Area (Premises)
|
An 8.5m² portion (being Office 2), of the
Clarkson Youth Centre situated on Crown Reserve 44537.
|
|
Term of Lease
|
Two (2) years.
|
|
Commencement Date
|
1 January 2012
|
|
Lease Rental
|
$1,450 per annum (with an annual CPI increment to
apply from 1 January 2013).
|
|
Permitted Purpose
|
Office space for the provision of youth support
activities and programmes.
|
|
Rates, Taxes and Outgoings (1)
|
The Lessee will be responsible for all rates, taxes,
assessments, impositions and outgoings for water consumption, electricity,
gas, and telephone used in relation to the Premises whether billed directly
or otherwise.
|
|
Building Insurance
|
The City will insure the building.
|
|
Other Insurance (including contents, public liability,
Workers Compensation etc)
|
Lessee responsibility.
|
|
Maintenance of Premises
|
The Lessee shall keep and maintain the inside of the
Premises in good and substantial repair and condition.
|
|
Statutory Compliance
|
Lessee responsibility as much as applies to the
Premises.
|
(1) Given the very minor amounts
involved in most of these charges the lease rental has been negotiated to
include these items except for the provision of services directly billed to the
Lessee such as telephone and internet charges.
In addition to the lease terms Youth Futures would also be
granted access to the Common Areas of the building such as the foyer and
toilets as part of the arrangement.
At the time of writing this report ‘in
principal’ support from State Land Services on behalf of the Minister for
Lands had not been obtained and will be required for the lease to proceed.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The programmes run by Youth Futures continue to align with
those run by the City at the Centre and on that basis Administration supports
the lease proposal outlined in this report.
Statutory
Compliance
The proposed lease is considered
an exempt disposition under Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996, which states:
“30(2) A
disposition of land is an exempt disposition if –
(b) the
land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not –
(i) the
objects of which are charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational,
recreational, sporting or other like nature; and
(ii) the
members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit
from the body’s transactions;”
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
The lease has been negotiated in accordance with the
City’s Tenancy Policy
Financial
Implications
The lease agreement will provide an income stream to the
City of $1,450 in year one of the lease, which will increase with CPI at the
commencement of the second year.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the leasing of portion of the Clarkson Youth Centre, 59 Key Largo Drive,
Clarkson known as Office 2 to Youth Futures WA (Inc) for a term of
two (2) years commencing 1 January 2012, subject to the consent of
the Minister for Lands; and
2. AUTHORISES
the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of
Wanneroo to and execute a lease between the City and Youth Futures WA (Inc).
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Site Plan - Clarkson Youth Centre - Youth Futures WA
Inc
|
11/131485
|
|
Chief Executive Office
Other Matters
CE01-12/11 Metropolitan
Local Government Review Submission
File Ref: 4063
– 11/138649
Responsible
Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
To be
circulated under separate cover.
Item
9 Motions on Notice
MN01-12/11 Cr
Rudi Steffens – Dog Exercise Area - Kingsway
File Ref: 2496
– 11/132465
Author: Cr
Rudi Steffens
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the provision of exercise areas specifically set
aside on Council Reserves for the purpose of exercising dogs.
Background
Council considered a proposal to consider providing a
specific dog exercise area within the City at a meeting of Council 19 July 2005
(S24/0016V1). The proposal was for Kingsway Reserve Madeley, Charnwood Reserve
Two Rocks, and Paloma Park Marangaroo to be considered as dog exercise areas.
The report identified that implementation of the dog exercise park would
require support and acceptance from the community and in particular the
immediate residents surrounding the proposed parks.
The overall results from the ensuing community consultation
supported the development of a dog exercise area. All three parks were
supported, with the strongest support being for Paloma Park and Kingsway
Reserve. Charnwood Park was not recommended as a dog exercise park as it
received the lowest level of community support.
At the meeting held 18 July 2006 (CD03-07/06), Council
approved the Kingsway Reserve site for the development of a pilot dog exercise
park. However at a further meeting held to consider this matter on 26
August 2008 (S24/00116V01) it was decided that due to the extent of the works
being conducted at Kingsway, the progress of a dog exercise park on this site
be delayed until the major works were completed. The full completion of
works was not estimated to be completed prior to the 2011/12 financial year,
however Stage 6 of the Kingsway complex is now not due for completion until
2012/13 financial year.
Detail
In order to advance the concept of dog exercise parks it is
suggested that a pilot dog exercise park be implemented with funding allocated
in the 2012/13 Capital Works Budget for this project.
Consultation
Refer to the community consultation conducted in 2006 in which
there was 88% support from respondents for Paloma Park and 91% support from
respondents for Kingsway Reserve.
Statutory
Compliance
City of Wanneroo Local Law 1999 prohibits the exercising of
dogs in Kingsway Reserve. Dogs may be exercised at Paloma Park off a leash
provided they are under effective control at all times.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Allocation of funding would be required in the 2012/2013
Capital Works Budget.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council CONSIDER the proposal to provide a pilot dog
exercise park and that funding be allocated in the 2012/13 capital works budget
for this proposal
Administration supports the consideration of these areas in
the deliberations for the 2012/13 budget process.
Attachments: Nil
MN02-12/11 Cr
Brett Treby – Basketball - Development in the Northern Suburbs
File Ref: 1922
– 11/137180
Author: Cr
Brett Treby
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requesting the Chief Executive Officer to
investigate the development of an Indoor Basketball Centre within the City of
Wanneroo capable of supporting a State Basketball League Club and to enter into
discussions with the Wanneroo Basketball Association (Wanneroo Wolves) and the
Western Australian Basketball Association in regards to the strategic
development of basketball within the City of Wanneroo.
Background
Basketball has continued to enjoy growth within the Perth
Metropolitan area and the Western Australian Basketball Association (WABA) plan
to develop the sport to be one of the top tiered
sports played within Western Australia.
Recently the WA State Government developed the State
Basketball Stadium at Perry Lakes which now provides a state of the art centre
for all state basketball clubs to access. The facility also caters for junior
level sport.
Detail
With the strong and sustained growth within the northwest
corridor, in particular the City of Wanneroo, it appears that there is a need
to expand the facilities within the corridor to support the in excess of 4,000
patrons currently enjoying the sport. In addition to this base is the expected
strong and continued growth of the sport within our Perth metropolitan area.
The south corridor of Perth is well supported with
basketball facilities for state league clubs located at:
Mandurah,
Cockburn,
Rockingham, and
Willetton.
As the City centre of Joondalup expands it is envisaged that
there will be little room for the Wanneroo Wolves to expand to cater for
increased demand within our corridor as our population expands. Currently, the
Wanneroo Wolves is also scheduling junior competition at the adjacent Edith
Cowan University to help deal with the peaks in demand.
Within the northern suburbs there are only two clubs, both
within the City of Joondalup at Warwick and Joondalup (Wanneroo Wolves). The
existing facility housing the Wanneroo Wolves within the Joondalup CBD has been
identified by Landcorp for future commercial expansion. As a consequence, an
opportunity presently exists to work with the sport to consider the future
strategic location of the Wanneroo Wolves within the boundaries of the City of
Wanneroo and the direction and future growth of the sport in the North West
corridor.
Contained within the City of Wanneroo Community Facilities
Plan is the development of a Basketball stadium within the Northern Coastal
Growth Corridor.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan
2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
Nil.
Financial
Implications
Nil at this stage, however funds may be required to further
progress this matter depending on the outcome of the early discussion.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council REQUEST the Chief Executive Officer to
investigate with the Western Australian Basketball Association and the Wanneroo
Wolves the best way that the City could work with the Association and
basketball clubs to further develop the sport within the City of Wanneroo
including possible locations and centre size.
Administration is supportive of entering into discussions to
better understand how the sport will cater for the increased demand as the City
of Wanneroo population grows.
Attachments: Nil
Item 10 Urgent Business
Item
11 Confidential
CR01-12/11 Yanchep
Active Open Space - Agreement to Address Costs and Responsibilities
File Ref: 5642
– 11/136492
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(i) a
matter that if disclosed, would reveal a trade secret, where the trade secret
is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government
File Ref: 5642
– 11/119469
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(d) legal
advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which
relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
CR03-12/11 Withdrawal
From Food Act Prosecution
File Ref: 5642
– 11/131600
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(d) legal
advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which
relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
CR04-12/11 Proposal
for Mary Lindsay Homestead
File Ref: 5642
– 11/136149
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community Development
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a
matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value
to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than
the local government
File Ref: 4674
– 11/132648
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a
matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value
to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than
the local government
CR06-12/11 Salaried
Officers Union Collective Agreement 2011
File Ref: 5992
– 11/135774
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session,
under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(a) a
matter affecting an employee or employees
Item 12 Date of
Next Meeting
The next Council Briefing Session has been scheduled for Tuesday
on 31 January 2012, to be held at Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 23 Dundebar
Road, Wanneroo.
Item 13 Closure
