Minutes
Unconfirmed
Special
Meeting of Electors
6.30pm, 12 November, 2012
Phil Renkin Centre, Two
Rocks
Please
refer to agenda for details of full reports and attachments.
Item 1 Open Meeting
Mayor Roberts opened the meeting at 6.30pm and welcomed Elected
Members, Directors and residents in attendance.
Item 2 Attendance and Apologies
TRACEY ROBERTS, JP Mayor
Councillors:
DOT NEWTON, JP Central
Ward
DIANNE GUISE Central
Ward
FRANK CVITAN Central
Ward
RUDI STEFFENS Coastal
Ward
NORMAN HEWER North
Ward
LAURA GRAY, JP North
Ward
ANH TRUONG South
Ward
BRETT TREBY South
Ward
STUART MACKENZIE South
Ward
Officers:
DANIEL SIMMS Chief
Executive Officer
LEN KOSOVA Director,
Planning and Sustainability
HARMINDER SINGH A/Director,
Infrastructure
FIONA BENTLEY Director
Community Development
NICKY BARKER A/Manager
Executive Services
ROBERT FIGG Manager,
Marketing, Communication & Events
KAREN BROWNE City
Lawyer
ROBYN HARKINS Minute
Officer
PETA COXELL Senior
Governance Officer
Item 3 Apologies
and Leave of Absence
IAN GOODENOUGH, JP Coastal
Ward
RUSSELL DRIVER Coastal
Ward
BOB SMITHSON Coastal
Ward
DENIS HAYDEN South
Ward
KAREN CAPLE Director,
City Businesses
LUCIA LAM A/Director
Corporate Strategy &
Performance
There were 35 registered members of the public in
attendance.
Item 4 Purpose of the Meeting
Under Section 5.28 of the Local Government Act 1995, electors
of the City of Wanneroo have requested that a Special Meeting of Electors be
held for the following reasons:
1. For
the City to provide information to Electors on the status of the proposed
Yanchep Active Open Space Project, the reasons for the project's delay,
proposed future direction and expected completion of the public open space;
2. To
discuss any issues arising from 1. above; and
3. For
the meeting to make any resolution it believes relevant to Council's consideration
of the matter.
Mayor Roberts invited the City's Director Planning and
Sustainability, Mr Len Kosova to address the meeting. Mr Kosova delivered an
overview of the current status of the project in line with the report presented
in the agenda.
Item
5 Meeting Open to the Floor – Public Question Time/Motions
The Mayor called for Motions or questions from the Floor.
1. Mr
Loftus thanked Council for providing the opportunity for the Electors Meeting
and commented that there was concern in the community that little information
was being provided on the progress of this project. Records resourced in 2009
show that Council was aware of the need for facilities in Yanchep. At that
time the then Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer recognised and acknowledged
that there was a future in the area and a need to construct a facility within two
years. The Director of Infrastructure commented to the media in 2010 that all
being well, the works would be completed by March 2012.
From
my research the problem seems to revolve around negotiations with the
developers and Council. The Community are being kept in the dark as everything
is discussed behind closed doors, with Council quoting confidentiality.
What
is the reason for confidentiality? The developer is speaking to the media and the
public. It is Council that wants to discuss matters behind closed doors. We
believe that not all information is going from the Developer to Administration and
then on from Administration to Councillors. This needs to be clarified.
Response
by Mayor Roberts
Council has always adhered to facts, in 2010 a much smaller
site was identified in Yanchep. This is now a larger opportunity.
2. In
2010 it was stated that this development would be ready in mid 2012. This was
in a statement made to the media.
Mayor Roberts requested that the Chief Executive Officer respond.
Response
by the Chief Executive Officer
In regard to the confidentiality issue, the Local
Government Act 1995 is specific in regard to matters to be discussed behind
closed doors. When Council makes this decision, it is according to the Act and
the reason is disclosed on the agenda item. It is Council's decision as to whether
to go behind closed doors or not.
I will request the Director Planning and Sustainability to
provide an overview regarding the comments on the first site as opposed to the
second site.
Response
by the Director Planning and Sustainability
In relation to confidentiality, the nature of the agreement
between the City and the Yanchep Beach Joint Venture is very complicated, and
for this reason, negotiations are being carried out in confidence and on a
"without prejudice basis", because whatever is said during the course
of negotiations will not be final until such time as the agreement is actually
settled and executed by the parties. As such it is not going to be possible for
this information to be made public.
I am not aware of Yanchep Beach Joint Venture having waived
its legal professional privilege or any confidentiality surrounding its
negotiations with the City on this matter. If that were to occur, then the
Council would need to formally consider the same of its own.
In relation to the earlier site, there was originally one
site of many that were identified through the earlier site selection process that
was carried out by Administration on its own, as well as subsequently with the
cooperation of the Joint Venture. The earlier site that was identified was
around 3 hectares in size and was to the immediate east of Saint Andrews Drive.
It was identified in the structure planning that was carried out for the area as
being a mixture of open space for vegetation protection and preservation as
well as adjacent residential development. The nature of that site meant that
it was never intended as a long term oval facility for the future planning of
Yanchep.
There were issues surrounding the access and long term
development of that site given the existing vegetation and substantial trees, as
well as the potential for the western portion of it to be developed for
residential purposes. For a range of reasons, not just those, the site was
discounted in favour of this more permanent site which is the ultimate oval site
for the Yanchep City centre.
3. The
concern is that a site was identified in 2010 and we were told that it would be
open in two years. It did not happen and our concern is, when will it happen?
No one can tell us. We have over 300 juniors playing football on one oval
which is a problem. We do not want our kids on the street. Clubs are growing exponentially,
how can we get it back on track? This comes to the motion that I wish to put
forward for the community to vote on later.
Response
by Mayor Roberts
The City is fully aware of the concerns of the community regarding
the demand for sports facilities. In 2010 it was a much smaller site and we
are now in 2012 and Council is planning to deliver two senior ovals as a
consequence.
Response
by the Director of Planning and Sustainability
From the news article that your read out earlier, the
Director Infrastructure stated that "all things going well", the
facility would be delivered in 2012.
At the time that statement was
made, it was absolutely believed to be the case. It is not as though things
have gone off track but the nature of negotiations is very complex and this is a
very complicated project to try and deliver. It is simply a matter of each
party continuing to work on narrowing the issues that need to be addressed so
that the City can move forward and execute a deed. The City has recently received
advice from Yanchep Beach Joint Venture in response to Council's October 2012 decision,
and this is going to be considered by Council at the earliest opportunity so
that we can continue to progress the deed and bring the project to fruition.
4. Can
Council confirm that they have received the Deed of Agreement in the last seven
days?
Response
by the Director of Planning and Sustainability
All that is appropriate to state at this stage is that the
City has received a response from the Joint Venture.
5. According
to your report tonight, it is still going to take another 21 months to
construct. We have spoken to a construction company proficient in these
matters who have said that it should take four months.
Mayor Roberts requested that Mr Loftus put his motion
forward:--
Moved Mr
Terry Loftus, Seconded Mr Graham Hailstones
That
Council:-
1. Ensure the Deed of
Agreement between the City of Wanneroo and Yanchep Beach Joint Venture is
finalised and signed by all parties before 31 December 2012;
2. By the end of
January 2013 the City of Wanneroo provide a detailed Construction Plan
providing a detailed timetable for the entire Yanchep Open Space construction
project for two ovals plus all facilities from start to completion and official
opening of the facilities;
3. If necessary, utilise
the principles of the City of Wanneroo's Pre-funding of Community
Infrastructure policy to ensure this project is not delayed by any financial
constraints; and
4. With the agreement
of the Council, and the Chief Executive Officer, this project be included in
the Annual Performance Review of all senior administration personnel involved
in this project, until the project is completed.
CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY
Mayor Roberts stated that decisions made at Special
Electors meetings are to be considered at the next Ordinary Council meeting or
if that is not practicable, then the following meeting. Therefore motions
received at this meeting will be considered at the 11 December 2012 Council
meeting.
a) As
part of the Yanchep Little Athletics Club, I want to reiterate that it is
necessary to have two ovals. Without two ovals there would be discord between
clubs wanting to all use the oval. There is currently no specific oval for Little
Athletics and children and parents have to travel to Ridgewood. We request
that the two ovals be done at once.
b) In regard to booking the oval, how will this take place
and who would get preference?
Response
by Mayor Roberts
Council is fully aware of the problem and the decision for
the two senior ovals was a unanimous decision of Council.
Response
by Director Community Development
The intention would be to apply the City's Facility Hire and
Use Policy. It guides Administration's determination of requests. City officers
have been working closely with the clubs and will continue to liaise with clubs
to make sure that all clubs are considered equitably. It is not a matter of
first in best dressed, the City will try to negotiate that every one has a fair
go .
Speaking on behalf of minority sport, not particularly the
bowls club, but as a person who takes part in bowls. There is no mention of improving
facilities for the bowling club.
We were told that it would be ten to twelve years before
anything could be done. It is understood that this is not specific to this
planning development but the building facilities at the bowling club are in a
fairly dilapidated condition. If the club is not accommodated within this new
area there is urgent need for discussions to look at an indoor facility due to its
substandard condition.
The ceiling is in bad condition and it is making it
difficult to attract new members as it is not in good condition. I understand
that the club secretary has been in touch with Council and are arranging a meeting
in early December but I wanted to mention that we rely a lot on these facilities
for bowlers and others.
Response
by Director Community Development
The City has been in touch with the Yanchep Sports Club on
a number of occasions. The land which is the subject of this meeting tonight has
been fully allocated with as many sports facilities as can be accommodated.
Unfortunately bowls was not amongst those.
When the City is able to secure regional open space which
is a requirement for the State Government to acquire, the City will look at
co-locating sports club facilities including bowls, tennis and others. The
City is wholly at the mercy of the State Government however have been proactive
in working with other growth Councils to research appropriate space and to lobby
on our behalf.
The Mayor reiterated that the City of Wanneroo and the
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture do share a vision for active open space for Yanchep.
Quite clearly all Councillors voted unanimously in support of two senior ovals
and confirmed that the City was open and transparent and were working very hard
in respect of their communities.
Item 6 Close of Business
Given that there were no further questions or motions, Mayor
Roberts declared the meeting closed at 6.58pm.