Council Agenda
Ordinary
Council Meeting
6.00pm, 08 December, 2015
Council Chambers, Civic
Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council
allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each
Council Meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the
allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If
there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the
person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During
the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s
proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask
questions during public question time may address the Council for a maximum of
3 minutes each.
A
register of person’s wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting
is located at the main reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night.
However, members of the public wishing to submit written questions are
requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours
prior to the start of the meeting i.e. noon on the previous day.
The
person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person
wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so.
A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address
before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the
agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and
statement time:
·
Questions should only relate to
the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
·
Only questions relating to matters
affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special
meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be
considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the
meeting.
·
Questions may not be directed at
specific members of council or employees.
·
Questions & statements are not
to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected
Member or Officer.
·
The first priority will be given
to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting
agenda.
·
The second priority will be given
to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under
consideration will be heard.
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal
session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre,
Wanneroo, commencing at 5.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment,
present deputations relating to items on the current agenda. If you wish to
present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing, at
least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief
Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A request
for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the Friday before
the Council Meeting.
·
Deputation requests must relate to
items on the current agenda.
·
A deputation is not to exceed 3
persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
·
Members of a deputation are
collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an
extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure that mobile
phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries
on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
·
To ensure that there is a process
in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
·
To emphasise that the reason for
recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and
that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of
Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of
the Council, Electors, and Public Question Time during Council Briefing
Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment,
except in the case of meetings of the Council where the Council closes the
meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause
(1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public
shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is
to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record
the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of
the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may
purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded
proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing
recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the recording
plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised
listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost
of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may
request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no
transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are
requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to
the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the
State Records Act 2000.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be
printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special
Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are
recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting
will be held at the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday
8 December, 2015 commencing at 6.00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive
Officer
4 December, 2015
CONTENTS
Item 1_____ Attendances_ 1
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence_ 1
Item 3_____ Public Question Time_ 1
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes_ 1
OC01-12/15 Minutes of Ordinary
Council Meeting held on 10 November 2015 1
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without
Discussion_ 1
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members_ 1
Item 7_____ Petitions_ 1
New Petitions Received 1
Update on Petitions 1
UP01-12/15 Installation of a bus
shelter and seating at stop 27095 Marangaroo Drive after Mereworth Way
(PT01-11/15) 1
UP02-12/15 To create a second exit
for Mary Street, Wanneroo (PT02-11/15) 1
UP03-12/15 Object to the district
planning amendment (152) allowing a cattery at 41 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo
(PT03-11/15) 2
UP04-12/15 Rezoning of the Gnangara
Special Rural area to Urban (PT04-11/15) 2
Item 8_____ Reports_ 3
Planning and Sustainability 3
Policies and Studies 3
PS01-12/15 Draft Amended State
Planning Policy 2.5: Land Use Planning in Rural Areas 3
Town Planning Schemes & Structure
Plans 7
PS02-12/15 Amendment No. 149
to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Lots 9164 and 9176 Flynn Drive,
Banksia Grove 7
PS03-12/15 Initiation of
Amendment No. 150 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Normalising the Zoning of
the Drovers Place Precinct 13
PS04-12/15 Final adoption of
Amendment No. 151 to DPS 2 22
PS05-12/15 Proposed Amendment
No. 23 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 26
PS06-12/15 Metropolitan Region
Scheme Amendment 1292/57: North-East and North-West District Omnibus 1 32
Development Applications 38
PS07-12/15 Consideration of
Development Application DA2015/1780 Single House Addition (Patio) at Lot 180
(97) Kemp Street, Pearsall 38
PS08-12/15 Retrospective
Single House Additions (Patios, Outbuilding and Ancillary Accommodation) at Lot
1 (37) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen 42
PS09-12/15 Reconsideration of
proposed drive-through addition to an approved Liquor Store at Lot 1031 (2)
Captiva Approach, Butler 48
Regulatory Services 54
PS10-12/15 Application to
Retain Existing Front Boundary Fences at Lot 106 and Lot 107 Safari Place,
Carabooda 54
Other Matters 59
PS11-12/15 Amberton Foreshore
Management Plan 59
PS12-12/15 Proposed Pedestrian
Accessway Closure - Pedestrian Accessway between Nott Place and Oldham Park,
Yanchep 67
PS13-12/15 Approval of
Expenditure from the Sustainability Investment Fund Reserve 73
Assets 78
Asset Management 78
IN01-12/15 City of
Wanneroo Roadwise Working Group - Amendment to Terms of Reference 78
Infrastructure Maintenance 81
IN02-12/15 Dewars Beach
Access Track - Progress Report 81
Infrastructure Projects 92
IN03-12/15 Wanneroo
Civic Centre Extension and Refurbishment 92
Tenders 95
IN04-12/15 Tender No
01545 - Supply and Application of Pesticides in Turf for a Period of 36 months 95
IN05-12/15 Tender No
01546 - Provision of Turf Renovation Services of Active Sportsfields and Public
Open Spaces for a Period of 36 Months 100
IN06-12/15 Tender No.
01550 - Park Asset Renewal 105
Traffic Management 113
IN07-12/15 Landsdale
Road, Darch - Proposed Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation
Results. 113
Community Development 121
Capacity Building 121
CD01-12/15 Community Funding Program
October 2015 Round 121
CD02-12/15 Installation of
commemorative plaque at Wanneroo War Memorial 127
Program Services 130
CD03-12/15 Update on Homelessness
and Sleeping Rough in the North Western Corridor 130
CD04-12/15 North Coast Ward
Community Reference and Sporting User Group Terms of Reference 134
CD05-12/15 Consideration of a
Proposed Pedalo Business at Brampton Park Butler 137
Other Matters 144
CD06-12/15 Riverlinks Sports
Amenities Building and Carpark - Request for a portion of 2016/17 funds to be
brought forward into 2015/16. 144
Corporate Strategy & Performance 147
Finance 147
CS01-12/15 Warrant of Payments for
the Period to 30 November 2015 147
CS02-12/15 Financial Activity
Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2015 211
CS03-12/15 Review of Accounting
Policy 222
CS04-12/15 Audited Annual Financial
Statements for the Period Ended 30 June 2015 227
Governance and Legal 235
CS05-12/15 Annual Report 2014/15 235
CS06-12/15 Donations to be
Considered by Council - December 2015 239
CS07-12/15 Delegation of Authority -
City of Wanneroo Local Laws - Appointment of Authorised Persons 249
CS08-12/15 Parking Local Law -
Delegations of Authority 252
CS09-12/15 Appointment of Delegates
and Community Representatives to Committees and Working Groups 256
Property 264
CS10-12/15 Proposed Commercial
Industrial Land Lease to Asphaltech Pty Ltd. Portion Lot 9003 (85) Mather
Drive, Neerabup 264
CS11-12/15 Shared Use Facilities
with the Department of Education - Licence Agreements 271
Chief Executive Office 277
Office of the CEO Reports 277
CE01-12/15 Tri-Cities Advocacy Visit
to Canberra 277
Item 9_____ Motions on Notice_ 279
MN01-12/15 Cr Dot Newton – Donation
Towards the Victims of the Esperance BushFires 279
MN02-12/15 Cr Sabine Winton –
Amendment to the Council Members Fees, Allowances and Reimbursements Policy 281
MN03-12/15 Cr Hugh Nguyen –
Recognising and Flying the Vietnamese Co Vang Flag 284
MN04-12/15 Cr Sabine Winton – Cr
Sabine Winton –Urgent Need for Further Consultation Regarding Proposed
Permanent Fence on Gumblossom Reserve 288
Item 10____ Urgent Business_ 292
Item 11____ Confidential_ 292
CR01-12/15 Request for Memorial
Plaque at Deeside Park, Butler 292
CR02-12/15 City of Wanneroo Mobile
Beach Safety Patrol – 2015/16 Summer Season 292
CR03-12/15 Southern Suburbs Library
(Kingsway) Update 292
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting_ 292
Item 13____ Closure_ 292
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we
wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on,
the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the
Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and
we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made
to the life of this city and this region and I invite you to bow your head in
prayer:
Lord, We ask for your blessing upon our City, our
community and our Council. Guide us in our decision making to act fairly,
without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty. May we
show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to a
prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen
Item 1 Attendances
Item 2 Apologies
and Leave of Absence
Item 3 Public
Question Time
Item 4 Confirmation
of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10
November 2015 be confirmed.
Item 5 Announcements
by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions
from Elected Members
Item
7 Petitions
New Petitions Received
Update on Petitions
|
|
|
Cr Zappa previously presented a petition of 15 signatories
for the installation of a bus shelter and seating at stop 27095 Marangaroo
Drive after Mereworth Way.
Update
Cr Zappa put a Motion on Notice to Council at its meeting
on 10.11.15, referring to, and addressing the issues raised in the petition.
Please refer to MN01-11/15.
|
|
|
|
Cr Newton previously presented a petition of 7 signatories
to create a second exit for Mary Street, Wanneroo, by joining Mary Street to
Benmuni Road, Wanneroo.
Update
A report will be presented to Council in early 2016.
|
|
|
|
Cr Cvitan previously presented a petition of 30
signatories objecting to the district planning amendment (152) allowing a
cattery at 41 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo on the grounds it does not meet the
objectives of special rural zoning.
Update
Amendment
No. 152 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 was advertised for public comment
between 6 October 2015 and 17 November 2015. A report is intended to be
presented back to Council early in 2016 for consideration.
|
|
|
|
Cr Treby presented a petition of 78 signatories in regards
to the rezoning of the Gnangara Special Rural are to Urban as per the Peel
3.5 million draft.
Update
A report will be
presented to the Council meeting of 2 February 2016.
|
Item 8 Reports
Declarations of
Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest.
Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive
Officer.
Planning and Sustainability
Policies and Studies
PS01-12/15 Draft
Amended State Planning Policy 2.5: Land Use Planning in Rural Areas
File Ref: 4033
– 15/531713
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a submission on proposed amendments to State
Planning Policy (SPP) 2.5: Land Use Planning in Rural Areas.
Background
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) adopted
its current SPP 2.5 in May 2012. Its aim was to support both rural and
rural living land uses to cater for future needs, acknowledging rural land
resources are becoming increasingly contested, leading to increased competition
and conflict.
Detail
The WAPC has now prepared a new draft SPP 2.5, which is to
be called SPP 2.5: Rural Planning Policy. Its aim is similar to that of
current SPP 2.5, except that it places greater emphasis on supporting rural
land uses (rather than rural living), and therefore addresses planning for
‘animal premises’ and rural land use buffer issues in greater
detail.
This new SPP 2.5 will supersede the current SPP 2.5, and
will also replace SPP 4.3: Poultry Farms Policy.
Attachment 1 is a copy of draft amended SPP 2.5.
Attachment 2 describes the main proposed changes to
current SPP 2.5.
Consultation
The WAPC is advertising the proposed new SPP 2.5 for public
comment, with the comment period concluding on 19 January 2016. In order to
meet the deadline for submissions it is necessary for Council to consider this
matter at its 8 December 2015 Meeting.
Comment
In releasing the draft revised SPP, the WAPC advised that it
is mostly unchanged from the current SPP 2.5. However, it does include a
number of proposed changes which are considered to be important for this City,
due to their implications for the following matters:
· How
existing rural uses in areas zoned Urban Deferred should be addressed.
(Important for Inghams, Wanneroo);
· How
proposals for new and expanded rural uses in areas proposed for future urban
development should be addressed. (Important for East Wanneroo, including
Crown Mushrooms);
· Rezoning
to Urban Deferred of rural areas affected by buffers to rural uses; (East
Wanneroo)
· Identification
of rural uses considered of ‘State significance’ and
‘priority agricultural land’ (Important for Carabooda/Nowergup, and
for how agricultural uses in East Wanneroo being displaced by new urban
development are to be compensated for; and
· How
basic raw material extraction should be addressed.)
Part 1 of Attachment 2 details Administration’s
comments on the main proposed changes to current SPP 2.5, and includes
recommendations on the proposed changes to be made to WAPC in a submission.
Part 2 of Attachment 2 includes further comments of a
more detailed nature, which are also recommended for inclusion in the Council
submission.
The main issues proposed to be addressed in the recommended
submission are:
1. Support
for the new SPP dealing with rural uses on Urban and Urban Deferred zoned land
(and not just rural zoned land as under the current SPP) so that it can also be
applied to issues such as Inghams (Wanneroo).
2. Opposition
to the new SPP not applying to extraction of basic raw materials in the
Perth-Peel region.
3. The
need for clarity about how it will be determined whether established rural land
uses are of State significance, and who will determine this. (The draft
SPP defines ‘State’ significance as: “A land use, area or
issue that is considered to be of significance to the State of Western
Australia by virtue of any or all of the economic, social, cultural or
environmental values for that land use, area or issue.”
4. The
need for acknowledgement that where animal premises are impeding urban
development, then the aim should be for them to eventually be relocated, and in
some cases this may be of State and/or regional significance, necessitating a
whole-of-government approach to implement relocation strategies. (The draft SPP
defines ‘animal premises’ as: “An umbrella term which
covers the following rural land uses: abattoirs, animal husbandry –
intensive (including poultry farms and piggeries), rendering plants and sale
yards. Does not include animal establishment, catteries or
kennels.”
5. Need
for the SPP to state new animal premises should not be located in proposed
urban areas.
6. Need
for the SPP to state that expansion to animal premises will only be supported
if such expansion will not make it more difficult to relocate the premises,
where such premises may currently be impeding future urban development.
7. Need
for policy measures dealing with proposed sensitive land uses in Urban and
Urban Deferred zoned areas (and not just rural zoned areas) which may be affected
by a rural land use.
(The
draft SPP defines ‘sensitive land uses’ as: “Land uses
that are residential or institutional in nature, where people live or regularly
spend extended periods of time. These include dwellings, short-stay
accommodation, schools, hospitals and childcare centres, and generally excludes
commercial or industrial premises.”)
8. The
need for the final Perth-Peel @ 3.5 Million Strategy and the final North-West
Sub-regional Structure Plan to provide information on primary production sites
of State significance and priority agricultural land, which draft SPP 2.5
proposes for strategic plans of these types. (The draft SPP defines
‘priority agricultural land’ as: “Land of State, regional
or local significance for food production purposes, due to its collaborative
advantage in terms of soils, climate, water (rain or irrigation) and access to
services. Priority agricultural land is derived from High Quality
Agricultural Land data that has been subject to consultation and refinement, and
has removed land required for existing and future urban/development areas,
public use areas and land required for environmental purposes”.)
Further,
that the State Government needs to develop a clear strategy for how it intends
to replace the agricultural areas which are important for supply of fresh local
produce, but are being lost to urban expansion.
9. Buffer
areas to rural uses need to be able to be zoned Urban Deferred, and not
necessarily left zoned Rural. This is where ‘sensitive zones’ are
proposed for buffer areas. (The Draft SPP defines ‘sensitive
zone’ as: “An umbrella term that covers land use zones that
specifically provide for development of sensitive land uses. These
include urban, urban development, residential, rural living and community
purpose zones, and proposals for the lifting of urban deferment.”)
Statutory
Compliance
If the City wishes to make a submission on the draft amended
SPP to WAPC, it must do so in writing, prior to 19 January 2016.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.1 Listening
and Leading - Our community actively participates in forums and events to
discuss and inform the local decision-making.”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Economic Growth
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Director Planning and Sustainability
|
Manage
|
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this
report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic
risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to
improve the existing management systems.
The specific risk referred to above relates to the draft
SPP’s proposals which could make it more difficult to see the eventual
relocation of Inghams, Wanneroo.
The proposed submission to WAPC will play a role in managing
this risk by making Department of Planning (DoP) and WAPC aware of the issue of
concern in considering the proposed final form of the SPP.
Policy
Implications
The draft SPP 2.5 conflicts with the City’s Local
Planning Policy (LPP) 4.9: Subdivision of Rural Zoned Land. The SPP
provides that subdivision of rural land will only be permitted in exceptional
circumstances (as set out in WAPC Development Control Policy 3.4 – Subdivision
of rural land), while LPP 4.9 provides that the City will support rural
subdivision applications, mainly on the basis of whether minimum lot size
criteria is met.
This SPP provision actually already exists in the current
SPP, so the conflict with LPP 4.9 has existed for some time. The DoP has
also previously made it clear that it has no regard for LPP 4.9 when assessing
rural subdivision applications.
Given the above, it is intended to undertake a comprehensive
review of LPP 4.9 in the near future.
The amended draft SPP 2.5 also has implications for LPP 5.3:
East Wanneroo, particularly in regard to rezoning of buffer areas, and this is
subject to current consideration by City and DoP officers dealing with the East
Wanneroo project.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the comments and recommendations
made in Attachment 2 of this Report and SUBMITS this as its submission to the
Western Australian Planning Commission on draft State Planning Policy 2.5:
Rural Planning Policy.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Draft State Planning Policy 2.5 Rural Planning Policy
|
15/572311
|
|
|
2.
|
Submission on Draft Amended SPP 2.5 Rural
Planning Policy (final)
|
15/572975
|
Minuted
|
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
PS02-12/15 Amendment
No. 149 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Lots 9164 and 9176 Flynn
Drive, Banksia Grove
File Ref: 22761
– 15/495848
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 10
Issue
To consider a request to amend District Planning Scheme No.
2 (DPS 2) by rezoning Lot 9164 and a portion of Lot 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia
Grove (amendment area) from Special Residential Zone No. 2 (SR 2) to Urban
Development Zone and amending Schedule 14 of DPS 2 to delete the amendment area
from SR 2.
|
Applicant
|
CLE Town Planning & Design
|
|
Owner
|
Housing Authority
|
|
Location
|
Lot 9164 and a portion of Lot 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia
Grove
|
|
Site Area
|
8.2262 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Special Residential
|
Background
In 1996, Town Planning Scheme No. 1 was amended to rezone
the land to the east and south of the Carramar Special Rural Zone (CSRZ) from
Rural to Residential Development and SR 2. The minimum lot size in SR 2 is
5,000m2. SR 2 extending from Wanneroo Road and along the eastern and
southern boundary of CSRZ was proposed as a transition zone between CSRZ and
the Residential Development Zone. Subsequently DPS 2 was amended to rezone the
Residential Development Zone to Urban Development Zone to facilitate the
preparation of structure plans. Attachment 1 contains an extract of the
DPS 2 zoning map depicting SR 2, which also includes the Special Residential
lots along the eastern boundary of the locality of Banksia Grove.
In June 2008, the City received a request from John Chapman
Town Planning Consultant (representing Peet & Co) and Chappell Lambert Everett
Town Planners (representing Department of Housing) to initiate Amendment No. 91
to DPS 2 to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,000 to 2,000m2 in the
undeveloped part of SR 2 located along the southern and eastern boundaries of
CSRZ.
Council at its meeting of 2 June 2009 resolved to prepare
Amendment No. 91 pursuant to section 75 of the Planning and Development Act
2005 (PS02-06/09). Attachment 2 contains an extract of DPS 2 depicting
the subject area as considered by Council. The City received advice from the
Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) that the proposed amendment was
acceptable. The amendment was advertised for a period of 42 days and the City
received 39 submissions. No submission was received from the residents of CSRZ.
Following the public comment period, however, at the request
of the applicants, Council at its meeting of 4 May 2010 resolved to not proceed
with the amendment for the following reason (Item PS01-05/10):
“The residential lots on
Golf Links Drive were marketed and sold by Peet and Co on the basis that the
opposite Special Residential zone would be subdivided into at least
‘one-acre’ (approximately 4,000m2) lots and that those
lots would be predominantly bushland lots. For this reason, the
purchasers of the residential lots claim to have paid around 50% more than the
other lots.”
Although not proceeding with Amendment No. 91 did not affect
the SR 2 along the eastern boundary of CSRZ, the applicants representing the
Department of Housing, also requested withdrawal of the amendment with an
intention to consider it at a later stage.
On 16 April 2015, CLE Town Planning and Design, on behalf of
Banksia Grove Nominees (acting on behalf the Department of Housing), submitted
Amendment No. 149 to DPS 2 to rezone the amendment area from SR 2 to Urban
Development and to amend Schedule 14 of DPS 2 by deleting the amendment area
from SR 2.
The amendment area forms part of Banksia Grove Agreed
Structure Plan No. 21A (ASP 21A).
Detail
Site
An aerial photograph of the amendment area is provided as Attachment
3. The site is approximately 8.63 hectares in area and is subject to WAPC
subdivision approvals 146580 dated 14 February 2013 (Attachment 4) and
147352 dated 29 January 2014 (Attachment 5) to create 5,000m2
lots as per the DPS 2 provisions. As the subdivisional lots cannot gain access
from Pinjar Road, which is an Other Regional Roads Reserve under the Western
Australian Planning Commission’s Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and DPS
2, the subdivision proposed a road interface between the CSRZ and the
subdivisional lots. The interface road named as Moort Rise has not yet been
fully constructed by the developer excepting for the northern portion
constructed through a separate subdivision approval.
The amendment area is undeveloped and slopes gently towards
the west, and is predominantly vegetated in low woodland with an understorey of
open heath. The applicant has advised that on review of ASP 21A, the amendment
area is not known to have any significant vegetation requiring retention.
Proposal
In Schedule 14 of DPS 2, SR 2 is currently described as Swan
Location 2579, Lots 1 and 2 Flynn Drive, Neerabup. Following subdivision of SR
2 land over a period of time, SR 2 can be now described as:
· Lots
2111 – 2115 Carramar Road, Carramar,
· Lots
3186 - 3193 Golf Links Drive, Carramar,
· Lots 5001 – 5006 Peridot Turn, Banksia Grove,
· Lots 70 – 78 Turquoise Loop, Banksia Grove,
· Lots 398 – 401 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove, and
· Lots
9164 and 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove.
The proposal seeks to amend DPS 2 by:
1. Rezoning
Lot 9164 and a portion of Lot 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove from Special
Residential to Urban Development and amending the scheme maps accordingly; and
2. Modifying
the description of SR 2 in Schedule 14 – Special Residential Provisions
by excluding the amendment area.
The applicant’s justification for the
proposed amendment can be summarised as follows:
1. The
proposed rezoning of the land to Urban Development under DPS 2 is consistent
with the Urban zoning under MRS; and
2. As
per the subdivision approvals for the amendment area, a 14-metre wide road
reserve will be proposed along the boundary with CSRZ. Therefore the
residential lots created by the subdivision in effect may not constitute a
transition zone. The remaining portion of Lot 9176 would be directly backing
onto CSRZ and remain as a transition zone, and therefore it is not proposed to
be excluded from SR 2.
Attachment 6 contains the
scheme amendment map showing the existing and proposed zoning of SR 2.
Consultation
Under the provisions of the Planning and Development (Local
Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations) the amendment is
considered to be a standard amendment and therefore it will be required to be
advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days. Subject to the EPA
approval the scheme amendment will be advertised. Advertising is to occur
in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of the Regulations:
· Placement
of an advertisement in a local newspaper;
· Placement
of a sign on affected sites, giving notice of the proposal;
· Display
notice of the proposal in Council offices;
· Display
on the City’s website; and
· Writing
to the affected persons and agencies.
Comment
Pre-consultation with adjoining landowners by
applicant
The applicant has held pre-consultation discussions with
adjoining landowners of CSRZ to inform them of the proposed scheme amendment
and a subdivision concept plan. A copy of the subdivision concept plan is
provided as Attachment 7.
The applicant has advised the City that the landowners were
generally supportive of the proposal with the following points raised:
· Appropriate
rear boundary fence to be constructed in consultation with the adjoining CSRZ
landowners at the subdivision stage along Moort Rise at the developer’s
cost; and
· Traffic
control measures on Moort Drive to minimise possible hooning.
The pre-consultation carried out by the proponent was
informal and undertaken to identify any major concerns or issues held by those
directly adjoining landowners. The proposal will be put through a
statutory consultation process which will allow these landowners and others in
CSRZ to make a formal written submission on the amendment. These formal
submissions will be considered by Administration as part of its assessment of
the amendment proposal.
Building Protection Zone and vegetation retention
As per the requirement of the above-mentioned subdivision
approvals, the developer has prepared fire management plans (FMP) for both
approvals. One of them relating to subdivision approval 146580 was approved by
the City’s Chief Fire Officer in December 2012. Attachment 8
contains a combined FMP for the entire amendment area delineating a 20-metre
wide Building Protection Zone (BPZ) around the 25x25 metre building envelopes.
The BPZ covers the entire lot excepting for a vegetation strip along Pinjar
Road.
The proponent has provided an updated FMP to support the
subdivision concept plan associated with the amendment proposal. Attachment
9 contains a map depicting the BPZ for the 1,500m2 lots. These
lots are 23 metres wide and therefore the 20-metre wide BPZ overlaps into the
adjoining lots. This FMP also shows the vegetation strip along Pinjar Road.
BPZ is a low fuel area immediately surrounding the
buildings. Driveways, lawn or landscaped area including deciduous trees can
form part of BPZ. Creating a BPZ will ensure vegetation and fuels within close
proximity to buildings are managed to reduce predicted radiant heat flux levels
and improve the survival of buildings in the event of a fire.
The level of retained vegetation east and west of the
building envelopes (between the proposed 1500m² and the approved
5000m² lot) is the same. There may be some opportunity to retain some
additional vegetation north and south of the building envelopes in the
5000m² lot scenario as compared with the 1500m².
Administration’s recommendations
Considering the above matters, Administration supports the
proposed amendment for the following reasons:
· The
14-metre wide Moort Rise will act as an interface between the CSRZ and the
residential lots when developed; and
· The
CSRZ residents immediately adjoining the amendment area are generally
supportive of the amendment proposal provided the developer constructs an
appropriate fence along the rear boundary of their lots and provides suitable
traffic management devices to address any possible hooning.
Amendment to ASP 21A
Based on the DPS 2 amendment, the applicant proposes to
amend ASP 21A by rezoning the amendment area from Special Residential Zone to
Residential Zone with a density coding of R10. Under the provisions of the WAPC’s
Residential Design Codes, the minimum and average lot sizes in R10 area are 875
and 1,000m2 respectively. However, the applicant has proposed 1,500m2
lots as shown in the subdivision concept plan (Attachment 7) and
appropriate statutory provision 10.7.1 to that effect in the structure plan
amendment as indicated in Attachment 10.
Under the provisions of the Regulations local government
must advertise an amendment to a structure plan within 28 days of receiving it.
In this instance it is considered appropriate to advertise it when the scheme
amendment is advertised. This will provide an opportunity to the residents to
comment on both proposals at the same time.
Conclusion
CLE Town Planning and Design, on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees (acting on behalf of the landowner), submitted Amendment No. 149 to
DPS 2 in regard to SR 2 by deleting the amendment area from SR 2 and to rezone
it as Urban Development. It is recommended that the amendment be advertised for
a period of 42 days should the EPA advise that an assessment is not required.
Statutory
Compliance
Under the provisions of the Planning and Development (Local
Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations), the amendment is
considered to be standard as it is consistent with MRS, which zones the
amendment area as Urban. Therefore as per the provisions of the Regulations the
amendment will require to be advertised for a period of 42 days.
In the event Council does not support this proposal, there
is no right of appeal against the decision not to initiate a scheme amendment,
however, Section 76 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 entitles a
proponent for a scheme amendment to request the Minister for Planning to review
the local government’s decision. In determining what (if any) further
action to be taken, the Minister must consider whether the local government
should have initiated the scheme amendment.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES
Amendment No. 149 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) Rezone Lot 9164 and
portion of Lot 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove from Special Residential to
Urban Development and amend the scheme map accordingly as shown on Attachment 6
to this report; and
b) Replace the ‘Special Residential Zone No.2’
provisions of Schedule 14 - Special Residential Provisions with the
following table:
|
NO
|
DESCRIPTION OF LOCALITY
|
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
|
|
SRes2
2
(formerly SRP No. 3 under TPS1)
|
Lots 2111 – 2115 Carramar Road, Carramar
Lots 3186 – 3193 Golf Links Drive, Carramar,
Portion of Lot 9176 Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove,
Lots 5001 – 5006 Peridot Turn, Banksia Grove,
Lots 70 – 78 Turquoise Loop, Banksia Grove, and
Lots 398 – 401 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove.
|
1) Subdivision is restricted to a minimum
lot size of 5000m² in accordance with the Development Guide Plans for
this zone and that all development shall be contained within the building
envelopes as specified on these plans.
|
2. RESOLVES,
pursuant to the Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local
Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations), that Amendment No. 149 of
the District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment pursuant to
Regulation 34(c) of the Regulations as it proposes to rezone the amendment area
to Urban Development to be consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme
wherein the amendment area is zoned Urban;
3. Pursuant
to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No.
149 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection
Authority (EPA); and
4. Subject
to EPA approval ADVERTISES Amendment No. 149 of the District Planning Scheme
No. 2 pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Regulations for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Amendment 149
|
15/548178
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Amendment No. 149
|
15/545811
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Aerial Plan
|
15/439026
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Amendment No. 149
|
15/535627
|
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 5 - Amendment No. 149
|
15/535642
|
|
|
6.
|
Attachment 6- DPS 2 Amendment
|
15/433048
|
Minuted
|
|
7.
|
Attachment 7 - Subdivision Concept Plan
|
15/438980
|
|
|
8.
|
Attachment 8 - Amendment 149
|
15/536575
|
|
|
9.
|
Attachment 9- Amendment 149
|
15/536576
|
|
|
10.
|
Attachment 10 - Amendment 149
|
15/552445
|
|
PS03-12/15 Initiation
of Amendment No. 150 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Normalising the Zoning
of the Drovers Place Precinct
File Ref: 21831
– 15/295839
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
For Council to initiate Amendment No. 150 to the City of
Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) for the purpose of
normalising the zonings prescribed in the City’s Drovers Place Precinct
Agreed Structure Plan No. 80 (ASP 80).
|
Applicant
|
City of Wanneroo
|
|
Owners
|
Various
|
|
Locations
|
Lot 100 (25) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Lot 5 (33) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Lot 6 (43) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Lot 12462 (47) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Lot 7 (53) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Lot 8 (61) Drovers Place, Wanneroo
Portion Lot 810 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 811 (1387) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 1 (1369) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 132 (1351) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 11 (1349) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 10 (1327) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 501 (1321) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 2 (1303) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Lot 406 (1297) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
Background
The location of the land parcels subject to ASP 80 (and
Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2) is outlined in the plan included in Attachment 1.
The land subject to the DPS 2 amendment is bounded by Wanneroo Road to the
east, Ashley Road to the south, Joondalup Drive to the north and the Yellagonga
Regional Park to the west.
The preparation of Amendment No.
150 was prompted by a written request Administration received from the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC). In that correspondence, the WAPC
requested the City consider initiating an amendment to DPS 2, to normalise the
zoning of the ASP 80 area under the local planning scheme (DPS 2). In
particular, the WAPC requested that consideration be given to rezoning Lot 810
(1397), Lot 811 (1387), Lot 1 (1369) and Lot 132 (1351) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
(situated in the ASP 80 Central Precinct) to a Business zone under the DPS 2. Administration
agrees with the WAPC’s view (expressed through its request to the City to
normalise the zoning) that the numerous amendments to ASP 80 made in recent
years have resulted in a complexity of the ASP 80 planning framework that was
not intended for this structure plan.
Currently, the entire ASP 80
area is zoned ‘Urban Development’ under DPS 2, with ASP 80
prescribing the various zonings for the land to be applied within that
structure plan area.
‘Normalising’ the
zoning in this context means amending DPS 2 in a way so that the zonings of the
land prescribed in ASP 80 become zonings under DPS 2.
Administration has previously advised Council of the
WAPC’s request to amend DPS 2 in its Council Reports relating to
Amendment No. 4 (PS02-11/15) and Amendment No. 5 (PS01-10/15) to ASP 80. When
Council considered those ASP 80 amendments, Council was advised through those
Reports that Administration was preparing a DPS 2 Amendment, and intended to
present a draft document for Council’s consideration once Amendments No.
4 and No. 5 to ASP 80 were finalised. Also, when Council considered adoption of
Amendment No. 5 to ASP 80, it resolved (in part) the following:
“5. REQUIRES Administration to submit
a report on the proposed amendment to the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to
normalise the zoning of the Drovers Place Precinct Agreed Structure Plan No. 80
area under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 once Amendment No. 4
and No. 5 to the Drovers Place Precinct Agreed Structure Plan No. 80 are
adopted and certified.”
More recently, Administration has received advice from the
Department of Planning that the WAPC would prefer the City initiate the DPS 2
amendment in the immediate term, and not wait until Amendment No. 4 and No. 5
to ASP 80 are adopted and certified. So as to not prolong the initiation of
this amendment, and to cooperate in good faith with the WAPC on this matter,
Administration is now presenting Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2 to Council for
initiation – even though the WAPC’s adoption and certification of
Amendment No. 4 and No. 5 are still pending.
Detail
Attachment 2 contains the amendment plan showing the
existing zoning of the subject land under DPS 2, and the zoning proposed
through Amendment No. 150.
Amendment No. 150 proposes to rezone the extent of ASP 80,
to replicate the zones as prescribed in this structure plan to equivalent
zonings under DPS 2 and in a manner consistent with the recommendations
resolved by Council regarding Amendments No. 4 and No. 5 to ASP 80. A table
outlining the similarities between zonings proposed in the DPS 2 amendment, and
the zonings of land under ASP 80 (or as recommended by Council through its
resolution Amendments No. 4 and No. 5 to ASP 80) is provided in Attachment 3.
Amendment No. 150 also proposes to impose a Special Control
Area over the ASP 80 area, and to create the necessary framework to enforce
locational-specific requirements through Special Control Area provisions in DPS
2. The locational-specific provisions for the Special Control Area are proposed
to be included in a new schedule of DPS 2, and would generally replicate the
locational, traffic and environmental requirements that are currently
prescribed throughout the ASP 80 text.
Amendment No. 5 to ASP 80 proposes to introduce a definition
of ‘Costume Hire’ into ASP 80, as it is not defined in Schedule 1
of DPS 2. Although ‘Costume Hire’ is not defined in DPS 2, its
permissibility is currently prescribed in the DPS 2 Zoning Table. Amendment No.
150 proposes to remedy this issue, by proposing a ‘Costume Hire’
definition into Schedule 1 of DPS 2 – consistent with what was proposed
through Amendment No. 5 to ASP 80. The ‘Costume Hire’ definition
proposed in Amendment No. 150 is as follows:
Costume Hire :
means an area of land or building used for the hire or sale of costumes.
Consultation
In accordance with Section 81 of the Planning and
Development Act 2005, Amendment No. 150 will need to be referred to the
Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), to assess the environmental impacts
of the proposal and to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is
necessary.
Subject to no objection being received from the EPA,
Amendment No. 150 will be advertised for public comment in accordance with the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the
Regulations).
Regulation 35 (2) of the Regulations require a scheme
amendment to be classed as basic, standard or complex by a local government to
determine the advertising requirements. Amendment No. 150 is deemed by
Administration to be a standard amendment, for reasons as discussed further in
the ‘Comment’ section of the Report.
Prior to advertising of Amendment No. 150, notification must
be provided to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) of
Council’s intention to advertise the amendment as a
‘standard’ amendment in accordance with Regulation 47 (1) of the
Regulations. On completion of that notification, advertising is proposed to
occur in the following manner for a period of no less than 42 days, consistent
with the requirements of 47 (2) to (4) of the Regulations:
· Advertisement
in a local newspaper;
· Display
notice of the proposal in Council offices and on the City’s
website; and
· Referral
in writing to affected persons/agencies.
Comment
Amendment No. 150 proposes changes to the DPS 2 text and
map, as outlined in the ‘Detail’ section above. The comments
below expand and further discuss the key matters associated with this amendment
proposal:
Amendment Type
Regulation 34 of the Planning and Development (Local
Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations) prescribe three types
of amendments to a local planning scheme – basic, complex and standard.
Pursuant to Regulation 35 (2), the local government (Council) must make a
resolution that:
(a) specifies whether, in the
opinion of the local government, the amendment is a complex amendment, a
standard amendment or a basic amendment; and
(b) includes an explanation of the
reason for the local government forming that opinion.
Administration considers Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2 to be a
‘standard amendment’. Pursuant to Regulation 34, Administration
considers Amendment No. 150 as an amendment to the scheme so that it is
consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), and is not considered to
align with the criteria applicable for ‘basic’ and
‘complex’ amendments, prescribed in the Planning and Development
(Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
The MRS zones the ASP 80 area as ‘Urban’, which
is a zone compatible of supporting the Residential, Business and Special Use
zones proposed for the subject land in Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2.
Application of a Special Control Area
With regard to the application of Special Control Area
provisions in local planning schemes (such as DPS 2), Administration has
received advice from the Department of Planning that:
· The
application of a Special Control Area needed to be argued and justified based
on site characteristics; and
· The
Special Control Area provisions should, where possible, avoid duplication with
corresponding provisions outlined in the General Provisions of DPS 2.
The City considers the application of a Special Control Area
over all lots currently contained in ASP 80 can be justified, as the subject
area has the following unique attributes not commonly found on other sites in
the City of Wanneroo:
· The
proposed Special Control Area is situated on (or abuts) an area of
environmental significance – being Yellagonga Regional Park. Much of the
site is also situated within a ‘compatible use wetland buffer’ and
a ‘high groundwater area’ as currently outlined in ASP 80. It is
considered by the City that the standard provisions in DPS 2 are inadequate in
maintaining the environmental attributes of the surrounding area. Therefore,
the imposition of a Special Control Area is necessary to utilise the existing
ASP 80 provisions relating to environmental management;
· Given
its location between the Yellagonga Regional Park and arterial roads (Wanneroo
Road and Joondalup Drive), vehicular access into the area currently within ASP
80 is limited and constrained. It is considered that special controls for
access provision need to be applied – and in particular, requirements for
the design and construction of traffic signals at the Wanneroo Road/Clarkson
Avenue and Drovers Place/Joondalup Drive intersections; and
· The
subject area has fragmented ownership, and provides for a variety of land use
activities, both current and planned. This is considered to add to the
complexity to the planning of this area, and the need for locational-specific
provisions being applied.
This amendment has been prepared following a request by the
WAPC to ‘normalise’ the zoning of the ASP 80 area. However, the
implications of normalising the zoning would result in ASP 80 no longer having
effect. The concern with that is this structure plan contains development
provisions intended to respond to the site specific attributes of the site. The
application of a Special Control Area as proposed in Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2
will allow for the development provisions outlined in ASP 80 to be utilised,
and be applied through DPS 2 should ASP 80 cease to have further effect.
Key Variances between ASP 80 and Proposed Special Control
Area Provisions
A detailed discussion on the proposed Special Control Area
provisions proposed through Amendment No. 150 is provided in the
Amendment’s Explanatory Report, included as Attachment 4. A
summary of the key variances between ASP 80 and proposed Special Control Area
Provisions are provided for below:
Reference to Local Development Plans
The Special Control Area provisions proposed for Amendment
No. 150 make reference to ‘local development plans’ being approved,
prior to further subdivision or development. This reflects the requirements
currently prescribed in ASP 80.
Local development plans is a term applied in the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, and replaces the
term ‘detailed area plan’ that has previously been applied through
DPS 2.
The change to the term of reference to ‘local
development plans’ will not change the ability to implement the
provisions of the detailed area plan previously certified for the ASP 80
Central Precinct.
Reference to Government Departments
The ASP 80 provisions specifically refer to the name of
government department or agencies – such as the Department of Environment
and Conservation or the Department of Water. However, references to specific
government agencies in the Special Control Area provisions proposed for
Amendment No. 150 have been minimalised, on the basis that government agencies
names and functions are likely to evolve over time, as they have in the past.
The proposed Special Control Area provisions will require
certain matters to be addressed to the satisfaction of the local government
(the City) – rather than to the satisfaction of a government agency or
department. The proposed Special Control Area provisions should not inhibit the
City’s satisfaction on certain matters being achieved through liaison
with the relevant government agencies and departments when required.
Submission of Management Plans
The provisions of ASP 80 prescribe that the
following management plans be provided at the subdivision or development
stages:
· Fire Management Plan;
· Urban Water Management Plan;
· Dieback Management Plan;
· Landscaping Plan; and
· Midge Management Plan.
However, noting the submissions received
through the advertising of Amendment No. 2 to ASP 80, Administration considers
that matters corresponding to the management plans listed above should be
addressed prior to the lodgement of a subdivision or development application.
Although Council at its 26 May 2015 and 21 July 2015 Meetings resolved not to
adopt Amendment No. 2 to ASP 80, Council’s decision was not formed by
this issue.
The provisions currently imposed in ASP 80
require a local development plan to be certified prior to the submission of an
application for subdivision or development, so that a local development plan
can be used to facilitate and inform subdivision design and/or development.
Administration considers subdivision and development within the proposed
Special Control Area would be better informed should the lodgement of a local
development plan be accompanied by these management plans, which can be agreed
to on certification of a local development plan.
Therefore, the table included in the
proposed new schedule of DPS 2 (proposed through Amendment No. 150) outlines
the abovementioned management plans be provided on submission of a local
development plan. This varies Table E of ASP 80, which prescribes that these
management plans be provided at the subdivision or development stages.
Changes to Local Development Plan Submission
Requirement – Vegetation Surveys
Table A (Section 1) of ASP 80 currently prescribes the
following as a matter to be included on a detailed area plan prepared for all
land parcels in the ASP 80 area:
“Detailed
site analysis including topography, vegetation, tree survey, view corridors, and
microclimate.”
However, Administration considers it appropriate for a local
development plan prepared for all land in the Special Control Area to instead
require the following:
“Detailed site analysis including topography,
vegetation, tree survey, view corridors, and microclimate. The vegetation
analysis and tree survey shall clearly identify and justify the extent of:
i) Any
clearing that is proposed during the subdivision and/or development stages; and
ii) Vegetation
that will be retained and managed at the subdivision and development
stages.”
The above was formulated by the City’s Administration
as a recommended modification to Amendment No. 2 to ASP 80, when it presented
the matter to the City’s 26 May 2015 Council Meeting. Although Amendment
No. 2 was not adopted by Council, the decision of Council was not particularly
formed by their opinion of this recommended modification.
Administration considers that subdivision
and development in the Special Control Area would be better informed should
this information be demonstrated on a local development plan – lodged
prior to subdivision or development. The extent of vegetation to be
retained and removed could then be agreed through the certification of the
local development plan, and before further subdivision and development of the
subject land.
Traffic Infrastructure Upgrades
Provisions relating to the design
and construction of traffic signals at the Wanneroo Road/Clarkson Avenue and
the Joondalup Drive/Drovers Place intersections as resolved by Council in its
considerations of Amendment No. 4 and No. 5 to ASP 80 have been included as
Special Control Area provisions within proposed Amendment No. 150 of DPS 2.
Costume Hire Definition
The ‘Costume Hire’ land use definition is
currently being sought as a modification to Table C (Section 2) of ASP 80
through that structure plan’s Amendment No. 5. Amendment No. 150 of DPS 2
proposes to incorporate the same land use definition sought through Amendment
No. 5 of ASP 80, into Schedule 1 of DPS 2.
Administration considers the inclusion of a ‘Costume
Hire’ land use definition in Schedule 1 of DPS 2 as justified, for the
following reasons:
· Table
1 of DPS 2 currently prescribes the land use permissibility of ‘Costume
Hire’. A definition in Schedule 1 of DPS 2 would better inform the land
use permissibility as outlined in Table 1 – and make clear what is (or is
not) permissible in each zone in relation to carrying out costume hire
activities; and
· It
has been requested of the City to ‘normalise’ ASP 80. In response
to that request, it was considered in the preparation of Amendment No. 150 that
the definition of ‘Costume Hire’ (proposed for ASP 80) is utilised,
and placed into DPS 2.
Revocation of ASP 80
The ASP 80 area is currently zoned ‘Urban Development’
under DPS 2. The proposed rezoning of the subject land to
‘Business’, ‘Residential’ and ‘Special Use’
as well as the replication of the development control provisions from ASP 80
would result in this structure plan no longer being necessary; as DPS 2 would
instead prescribe the relevant development control provisions and land use
permissibility.
Should ASP 80 become redundant following final adoption of
Amendment No. 150, the Council could consider requesting the WAPC revoke its
approval of this structure plan. The WAPC has the ability to consider
Council’s request, and resolve to revoke ASP 80 pursuant to Deemed
Provision 28 (4) of DPS 2. This Deemed Provision prescribes the following:
“(4) The Commission may revoke its approval of
a structure plan if the Commission considers that the structure plan cannot be
effectively implemented because of a legislative change or a change in a State
planning policy.”
Conclusion
As outlined above, Administration’s preparation of
Amendment No. 150 was prompted by correspondence received from the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) on 8 April 2015. In that correspondence,
the WAPC requested the City consider initiating an amendment to District
Planning Scheme No. 2, to normalise the zoning of the ASP 80 area under the
local planning scheme (DPS 2).
In response to that request, Administration
has now prepared Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2 in an effort to normalise
the zoning of land parcels in ASP 80. The amendment effectively would transfer
the same zoning and land permissibility prescribed for land parcels from ASP 80
into DPS 2. The zonings and land use permissibility proposed through Amendment
No. 4 and No. 5 (and as supported by Council) have been proposed as zonings and
land use permissibility in this DPS 2 amendment.
Administration considers that the general provisions of DPS
2 are insufficient to protect the unique locational, traffic and environmental
attributes and constraints of the land within ASP 80. As such, Amendment No.
150 proposes to impose a Special Control Area over the ASP 80 area, and to
create the necessary framework to enforce locational-specific requirements
through Special Control Area provisions in DPS 2.
Amendment No. 5 to ASP 80 proposes to introduce a definition
of ‘Costume Hire’ into ASP 80, as it is not defined in Schedule 1
of DPS 2. Although ‘Costume Hire’ is not defined in DPS 2, its
permissibility is prescribed in the DPS 2 Zoning Table. Amendment No. 150
proposes to add a ‘Costume Hire’ definition in Schedule 1 of DPS 2
– consistent with what was proposed through Amendment No. 5 to ASP 80.
If Amendment No. 150 were to be adopted by the Minister for
Planning, that would render ASP 80 redundant, as the ASP 80 provisions would be
transferred into DPS 2, and enacted through DPS 2. While Amendment No. 150 does
not formally propose the revocation of ASP 80, Council could later consider
requesting the WAPC revoke ASP 80, should the Minister for Planning grant final
adoption of Amendment No. 150.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 150 is required to be considered in accordance
with the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working
With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City
works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
Nil
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The costs in undertaking
Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2 can be met from the Planning and Sustainability
existing operational budget.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES
Amendment No. 150 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to
undertake the amendments to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2
as prescribed in the document included as Attachment 2;
2. Pursuant
to Regulation 35 (2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 150 of the District
Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment pursuant to Regulation 34 of the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, for the
following reason:
Amendment No. 150 is
considered to be a ‘standard’ amendment to the City
of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, as the amendment is consistent with
a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area (Metropolitan Region
Scheme), and is not considered to align with the criteria applicable for
‘basic’ and ‘complex’ amendments, prescribed in the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
3. Pursuant
to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No.
150 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental
Protection Authority; and
4. Subject
to no objections being received from the Environmental Protection Authority and
pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015, NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning
Commission of its intention to advertise Amendment No. 150 and ADVERTISES
Amendment No. 150 for public comment for a period of not less than 42 days,
pursuant to Regulation 47(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Amendment No. 150 to
DPS 2
|
15/541557
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Initial Amendment Document - No Explanatory
Report - Amendment No. 150 to DPS 2 - Drovers
|
15/572771
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Comparing ASP 80 Zonings with DPS 2
Proposed Zonings
|
15/545713
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Explanatory Report - Amendment No. 150
to DPS 2
|
15/572800
|
|
PS04-12/15 Final
adoption of Amendment No. 151 to DPS 2
File Ref: 22762
– 15/520649
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Previous Items: MN01-07/15
Agenda; MN01-07/15
Resolution
Proposal
to remove Civic and Cultural zoning from Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane, Alexander
Heights and incorporate the land into Alexander Heights Park
CB03-09/12
Resolution
Possible
Development of the Civic and Cultural Site Located in Park Lane Alexander
Heights
CB10-04/13
Agenda; CB10-04/13
Resolution
Withdrawal
of Interest to Develop Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane, Alexander Heights
Issue
To consider the submissions received during the public
advertising of Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2) and
adoption of that amendment.
|
Owner
|
City of Wanneroo
|
|
Location
|
Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane, Alexander Heights
|
|
Site Area
|
2840.521m2
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Civic and Cultural
|
Background
Council, at its meeting of 21 July 2015 considered a
proposal to rezone Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane, Alexander Heights from Civic and
Cultural to Parks and Recreation Reserve and resolved as follows (refer Item
MN01-07/15):
“That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act INITIATES Amendment No. 151
to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane, Alexander
Heights from Cultural and Civic Zone to Parks and Recreation Reserve;
2. Pursuant
to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 REFERS Amendment No. 151
to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority for
comment;
3. Subject
to no objection being received from the Environmental Protection Authority,
ADVERTISES Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for public
comment for a period of 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 25(2) of the Town
Planning Regulations 1967; and
4. FORWARDS
a copy of Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western
Australian Planning Commission for information.”
Attachment 1 contains a location plan.
Attachment 2 contains the proposed Scheme Amendment
map.
Detail
Proposal
Amendment No. 151 proposes to rezone the land from Civic and
Cultural to Parks and Recreation under DPS 2. The land is effectively
part of the Alexander Heights Park and is currently used by the community as
part of this park.
Consultation
In accordance with the Council’s decision, the
amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for
comment. On 31 August 2015, the EPA advised the City that the scheme amendment
did not warrant an environmental assessment. The Western Australian Planning
Commissions (WAPC) consent to advertise was not required in this case.
A 42-day public advertising period was carried out between
22 September 2015 and 3 November 2015 by way of on-site signs, advertisement in
the local newspaper, a notice in Council offices and the City’s website,
and letters to the affected and nearby landowners. The City received three submissions,
two of which support the proposal and one providing comment on the proposal.
Comment
Tenure of subject land
The purpose of rezoning Lot 5483 is to recognise that the
land is not required for a Civic and Cultural purpose and is instead seen by
Council as effectively forming part of the surrounding Alexander Heights
Park. Lot 5483 will remain in the City’s ownership and will not be
ceded to the Crown (as is the case with Alexander Heights Park).
Submissions
The following table provides a summary of the submissions
and Administration’s response.
|
No.
|
Name of Submitter(s)
|
Summary of submission
|
Response
|
|
1.
|
Kevin Burnett
|
Submitter supports proposed Amendment No. 151 to DPS 2
given the longstanding use of the land as part of the park.
|
Noted.
|
|
2.
|
Kevin and Bernice Lehane
|
Submitters support proposed Amendment No. 151.
Submitters comment that the opposition to previous development of the land by
the Vietnamese Community in Australia (WA Chapter) was based on the fact it
would have resulted in the unnecessary clearing of a number of trees.
|
Noted.
|
|
3.
|
Water Corporation
|
A sewer main exists to serve Lot 5483 located along the
southern side of Lot 5484, and a water main and service tap exists in Park
Lane, therefore Lot 5384 is rated for both water and sewerage.
|
Noted. The presence of a sewer main will not be
affected by the lot being rezoned from Civic and Cultural to Parks and
Recreation Reserve.
|
Considering the matters noted in the table above, it is
recommended that the amendment proposal be adopted without modification and
forwarded to the WAPC for its consideration and recommendation to the Minister.
Type of amendment
Amendment No. 151 was initiated by Council prior to the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations)
taking effect and therefore was not classified as either a basic, standard or
complex amendment in accordance with the Regulations. The Regulations requires
scheme amendments to be classified by the local government prior to them being
forwarded to the WAPC. Amendment No. 151 is considered a standard
amendment pursuant to Regulation 34 (e) as it is an amendment that would have
minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the
amendment.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 151 was prepared and advertised in accordance
with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Town Planning
Regulations 1967. As Council is aware, the Planning and
Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 which superseded the
1967 Regulations were gazetted on 25 August 2015 and took effect from 19
October 2015. Amendment No. 151 will now be progressed in accordance with
the new Regulations.
In accordance with Regulation 50(2), Council is required to
consider the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 151 and must
resolve to either (a) support the amendment without modification, (b) support
the amendment with proposed modifications to address issues raised in the
submissions; or c) not to support the amendment.
Further, pursuant to Regulation 53(1), Council must provide
the WAPC with (among other things) a copy of the resolution passed under
Regulation 50 (3), a schedule of submissions and Council's recommendation and
response to the submissions, together with particulars of any modifications
recommended to the amendment.
Administration recommends that Council adopts Amendment No.
151 in accordance with Regulation 53(1) without modification.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RESOLVES
pursuant to Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015, that Amendment No. 151 to District Planning
Scheme No. 2 to rezone Lot 5483 (41) Park Lane Alexander Heights to
Parks and Recreation reserve is a standard amendment as it is an
amendment that would have minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not
the subject of the amendment, acknowledging that Amendment No. 151 was
initiated for the purposes of advertising prior to commencement of the Planning
and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015;
2. Pursuant
to Regulation 50(3), SUPPORTS Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No.
2, as shown in Attachment 2, without modification;
3. AUTHORISES
the Mayor and Director, Planning and Sustainability to SIGN and SEAL the
Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents;
4. PROVIDES
Amendment No. 151 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian
Planning Commission for its consideration; and
5. ADVISES
the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Location Plan
|
15/523726
|
|
|
2.
|
Amendment No. 151 to DPS 2 Map
|
15/431795
|
Minuted
|
PS05-12/15 Proposed
Amendment No. 23 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3
File Ref: 3377-24
– 15/499208
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider submissions received during public advertising
of Amendment No. 23 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 (Tapping and Ashby) Agreed
Structure Plan No. 3 (ASP 3) and support of the amendment.
|
Applicant
|
Rowe Group
|
|
Owner
|
Freshlink Export Pty Ltd
|
|
Location
|
Lot 19 (20) Clarkson Avenue, Tapping
|
|
Site Area
|
40426m2
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
|
ASP 3 Zoning
|
Commercial and Residential
|
Background
On 30 October 2014, Rowe Group, on behalf of Freshlink
Export Pty Ltd, lodged Amendment No. 23 to ASP 3 for the City’s
consideration. The amendment relates to the eastern portion of Lot 19 (No. 20)
Clarkson Avenue, Tapping, as identified on the map included as Attachment 1.
The eastern portion of the site is zoned 'Residential' with a density
coding of R40 under ASP 3. The western portion of the site is zoned
‘Commercial’ however is not subject to this amendment.
Approval for subdivision of the subject site has been
granted by the Western Australian Planning Commission on 6 November 2014 (WAPC
150486). Upon completion, the subdivision will facilitate the extension of
Corvus Road and will split the site into two separate land parcels.
On 28 April 2015, the Manager Planning Implementation
forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for
members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to
advertised. No such requests were received and, as such, advertising of Amendment
No. 23 to ASP 3 commenced on 19 May 2015 in accordance with Clause 9.5 of
District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Detail
Amendment No. 23 proposes to modify the ASP 3 map and text
to increase the residential density coding of the subject site from R40 to R60
and to increase the site’s height restrictions. The application initially
proposed a maximum height of 24m (8 storeys) above natural ground level (NGL),
however, prior to advertising, this proposal was reduced to a maximum height of
12m (4 storeys) above natural ground level (NGL). Attachment 2 shows the
existing and proposed ASP 3 maps for the subject site as well as the proposed
text modifications.
The purpose of the amendment is to enable a greater housing
yield to facilitate multiple dwellings on the subject site. Under the current
R40 coding, the subject site is capable of generating 1.164ha of plot ratio
floor space.
If supported, the R60 coding will allow for 1.358ha of plot
ratio floor space, an increase of 1,940m2 of plot ratio floor space
on the subject site. The applicant has indicated that the future development of
the site is likely to incorporate multiple dwellings of approximately 80m2
in area. Assuming 80m2 multiple dwellings are developed on the site,
under the R40 coding 145 dwellings can be created whilst the R60 coding will
allow for 169 dwellings, an increase of 24 dwellings.
The height restrictions will be implemented as part of a
Local Development Plan for the subject site. The proposed layout of the site
will include the following:
· A
4m building setback buffer between the subject site and the existing
Residential R20 lots adjoining the site;
· A
maximum height of 6.0m above NGL (2 storeys) between 4.0m and 20.0m from the
southern and eastern lot boundaries;
· A
maximum height of 9.0m above NGL (3 storeys) between 20.0m and 45.0m from the
southern and eastern lot boundaries; and
· A
maximum height of 12.0m above NGL (4 storeys) for the portion of land at the
intersection of Clarkson Avenue and Corvus Road.
The applicant has not provided any concept plans for the
future development or subdivision of the site.
Consultation
The amendment was advertised for public comment for a period
of 42 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times
newspaper, the City’s website and letters written to adjoining
landowners. The submission period closed on 30 June 2015, with 13 submissions
being received including one petition with 83 signatures. A summary of
submissions received and Administration responses are shown in Attachment 3.
The main issues raised during the advertising period relate
to:
· Inconsistency
between the proposed R60 coding and the surrounding locality;
· Traffic
generation;
· Building
heights; and
· Incompletion
of Hirundo Bend.
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in
the assessment of Amendment No. 23 is provided below.
Comment
Assessment against Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local
Housing Strategy
The amendment area falls under ASP 3, and as such, the
proposal is subject to the requirements of Clause 9(b) and Table 1 of the
City's Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing Strategy Implementation (LPP
3.1). Table 1 of LPP 3.1 outlines criteria and specifies distances to
infrastructure and nearby amenities which a site should meet in order for the
City to support an application for re-coding of that lot. The proposal has been
assessed against and is considered to satisfy the provisions of LPP 3.1 for the
following reasons:
· It
is considered the amendment is appropriate within the broader planning
framework as the Residential zone aims to provide a range of densities and a
variety of housing to meet the needs of different household types.
· The
proposal is considered to satisfy the criteria of LPP 3.1 (Table 1), and summarised
as follows:
o The amendment area abuts
a Neighbourhood Centre;
o The amendment area is
located within 200m of existing, high frequency bus routes;
o The amendment area is
located within 200m of Nankeen Park; and
o The amendment area is
located in close proximity to major arterial roads, both secondary and primary
educational institutions as well as community facilities.
· The
proposal is generally in accordance with the objectives outlined in Part 9 of
the City of Wanneroo Local Housing Strategy 2005 (LHS).
Key issues raised during advertising
Inconsistency between the proposed R60 coding and the
surrounding locality
Numerous submitters raised concerns that the proposed
recoding to R60 is inconsistent with the existing R20 and R30 lots in the locality.
Whilst these concerns are noted, the proposal is
consistent with State Government policies including WAPC’s
Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and Directions 2031; and the City’s Local
Planning Policy 3.1 – Local Housing Strategy Implementation (LPP 3.1).
These policies promote higher residential densities in urban areas that are
within close proximity to retail and employment centres, public transport
services, major arterial routes, educational institutes and community
facilities. The subject site abuts a neighbourhood centre, is adjacent to both
a secondary and primary school and is within 200m of high frequency bus routes
on Wanneroo Road.
The policies noted above also promote the facilitation of
increased housing diversity and affordability and planning for an increased
supply of housing and land in response to population growth and changing
community needs.
In light of the above, whilst it is noted that the proposed
R60 coding is a higher density than the surrounding residential development, it
is considered appropriate given the context of the subject site.
Traffic Generation
Concerns were raised that the increased density coding of
the subject lot would potentially result in traffic congestion on the
surrounding road network. An accompanying Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA)
prepared by Transcore was submitted with the proposal.
As previously stated, the proposed recoding is estimated to
increase the potential dwelling yield from 145 to 169 dwellings, resulting in
an increase of 24 dwellings. Based on the Main Roads WA (MRWA) transport data,
a single dwelling is assumed to generate 10 vehicle trips per day (VTPD) on
average. However, the accompanying TIA considers that 8 VTPD is more suitable
due to the smaller size of the future dwellings on the site on the basis that
smaller dwellings are likely to hold fewer occupants and therefore will result
in less traffic. If 8 VTPD was to be used, the proposal would increase the
total VTPD from 1160 to 1352. Based on existing traffic patterns and attraction
nodes in the surrounding locality, the TIA assumes that daily traffic will be
distributed in accordance with the following:
· 32%
of VTPD would travel south on Wanneroo Road;
· 16%
of VTPD would travel north on Wanneroo Road;
· 20%
of VTPD would travel east on Clarkson Avenue; and
· 32%
of VTPD would travel south on Corvus Road and Hirundo Bend.
The City's Traffic and Transport Service Unit has assessed
the TIA provided by the applicant and has confirmed that the projected traffic
increases will not have a detrimental impact on the road network.
Having regard to the additional traffic of 192 VTPD that are
anticipated to be generated by the future development of the subject area as a
result of the proposed amendment, it is not considered to adversely impact on
the flow of traffic in the surrounding area.
Building Heights
Concerns were raised regarding the proposed building heights
for the subject site and the impact that these heights will have on the
existing residential dwellings within the locality. Whilst the amendment
proposes to increase the maximum building heights for a portion of the subject
lot, the proposed height limits have been designed to reduce the impact of
future development on the surrounding residential development. A draft Local
Development Plan illustrating the proposed building heights is included in Attachment
4. As indicated on this plan, a 4m building setback will separate the
future development of the subject site from adjoining lots. In addition,
staggered building height limits have been implemented to ensure that the 12m
maximum building heights are setback no closer than 40 metres from the
adjoining residential properties. Administration considers that these measures
are appropriate and will ensure that the impact of building bulk on adjoining
properties is reduced.
Incompletion of Hirundo Bend
Whilst the amendment does not propose any modifications to
the surrounding road network, the submissions highlighted existing issues
associated with the incompletion of Hirundo Bend. When ASP 3 was first adopted,
Hirundo Bend extended into the subject site before connecting with Corvus Road.
However, this connection was removed when Amendment No. 12 to ASP 3 was adopted
and as a result, Hirundo Bend is now incomplete on the ASP 3 map as indicated
in Attachments 1 and 2. Hirundo Bend has now been constructed in
accordance with the ASP 3 map which has resulted in the following issues:
· A
lack of connectivity now exists from Hirundo Bend to Corvus Road and Clarkson
Avenue. Given that the subject site abuts a neighbourhood centre and is
adjacent to a school, a lack of pedestrian and cycling connection from Hirundo
Bend is undesirable.
· Hirundo
Bend abruptly ends at the southern lot boundary of the subject site, with no
cul-de-sac head or reversing bay being provided. As a result, vehicles
utilising this portion of Hirundo Bend have no means of turning and exiting the
road in forward gear. This issue is particularly relevant to waste collection
vehicles when servicing 19 and 21 Hirundo Bend.
Whilst the matters noted above are not directly associated
with the proposed amendment, Administration considers this application to be an
opportunity to include additional provisions within the structure plan to
ensure that these issues are addressed through the future development of the
land. Administration has discussed the matter with the applicant and the
following modifications have been proposed in order to address the issues
associated with the incompletion of Hirundo Bend:
· Incorporate
a pedestrian access easement linking Hirundo Bend with Corvus Road to ensure
that pedestrian and cycling connections are established. This pedestrian access
easement should be annotated on the ASP 3 Map as well as incorporated into the
structure plan text. The structure plan text should ensure that the easement is
provided with surveillance and lighting which will make certain that the
pedestrian connection is usable and safe.
· Include
a textual provision requiring the future development of the subject site to
make allowance for vehicles entering Hirundo Bend to either turn within the
land and re-enter Hirundo Bend in forward gear or to connect from Hirundo Bend to
Corvus Road.
It is considered that the modifications outlined above will
ensure that the issues associated with the incompletion of Hirundo Bend are
addressed through the future development of the subject site. An updated
proposal incorporating the modifications outlined above is included in Attachment
5 with the modifications being highlighted.
Conclusion
Considering the above comments, the proposed amendment is
considered to be acceptable subject to the modifications included in Attachment
5.
Statutory Compliance
This structure plan amendment will follow the statutory
process outlined in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes)
Regulations 2015.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
This proposal has been assessed under the provisions of DPS
2, Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning and LPP 3.1.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to subclause 20(2)(e) of the deemed provisions of City of Wanneroo District
Planning Scheme No. 2, RECOMMENDS to the Western Australian Planning Commission
that Amendment No. 23 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 (Tapping and Ashby) Agreed
Structure Plan No. 3 submitted by Rowe Group on behalf of Freshlink Export Pty
Ltd included as Attachment 2 be approved subject to the modifications as
included in Attachment 5 and SUBMITS a copy of the proposed structure plan and
all accompanying material as received from the applicant;
2. Pursuant
to subclause 20(1) of the deemed provisions of City of Wanneroo District
Planning Scheme No. 2, PROVIDES the Western Australian Planning Commission a
copy of the report on the proposed structure plan amendment; and
3. NOTES
the Schedule of Submissions included in Attachment 3, ENDORSES Administration's responses to those submissions,
FORWARDS the Schedule of Submissions to the Western Australian
Planning Commission, and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Map
|
15/503259
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Existing and Proposed ASP 3 Maps
|
15/503247
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Schedule of Submissions
|
15/553285
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Draft Detailed Area Plan
|
15/503263
|
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 5 - Updated Proposal With Modifications
|
15/556087
|
Minuted
|
PS06-12/15 Metropolitan
Region Scheme Amendment 1292/57: North-East and North-West District Omnibus 1
File Ref: 2080
– 15/514476
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 10
Issue
To consider a submission on proposed Metropolitan Region
Scheme (MRS) Amendment 1292/57: North-East and North-West District Omnibus 1.
Background
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) prepares
‘omnibus’ amendments to the MRS to make a large number of small
changes to the MRS through a single MRS Amendment. Proposed MRS Amendment
1292/57 is one of these omnibus amendments.
Detail
MRS Amendment 1292/57 includes 27 ‘proposals’
for changes to the MRS. These affect the local government areas of
Wanneroo, Swan, Stirling, Kalamunda and Mundaring.
Six of the proposals affect the City of Wanneroo (Proposal
Nos. 17 to 22) and detailed plans showing each proposal are provided as Attachments
1 to 6.
Attachments 7 to 9 are broader-scale plans which show
where the various sites are located.
Following is an overview of the six proposals affecting the
City of Wanneroo:
· Proposal
17: Involves a widening of the reserve required for the future Mitchell Freeway
extension through Alkimos, changing the zoning of various parcels of land from
Urban, City Centre, Other Regional Roads reserve and Parks and Recreation
reserve to Primary Regional Roads reserve. Main Roads WA has determined that
additional land is required for the freeway than originally thought required.
· Proposal
18: Involves rezoning an area of 2,850m2 in the north east corner of
the Girrawheen Senior High School site from Public Purposes – High School
reserve to Urban, to enable it to then be developed by the Department of
Housing for public housing.
The WAPC ‘Amendment
Report’ states that this area is superfluous to the requirements of the
Department of Education, and that the proposal will make land available for
affordable housing, with proceeds from the sale of the land expected to provide
finance for the school to undertake various capital works projects.
· Proposal
19: Involves reserving a strip of land between Wanneroo Road and Gibbs Road
from Rural to Public Purposes –WSD (Water Authority of WA). The
land is owned by the Water Corporation, and accommodates a water main
connecting the Carabooda reservoir to the coastal urban area. Water
Corporation has requested the proposed MRS reservation as it is the most appropriate
MRS classification for the land.
· Proposal
20: Involves rezoning from Parks and Recreation reserve to Rural, of the
portions of three properties in Pinjar. As the land concerned falls
outside of the Gnangara Underground Water Pollution Control Area, it is
proposed to change the zoning of the land to Rural, to facilitate the
continuation of existing rural activities on the subject land.
· Proposal
21: This involves transferring two small areas in Tapping and Banksia Grove
which are superfluous to the existing Pinjar Road reserve, from Other Regional
Roads reserve to Urban zone, and changing from Urban to Other Regional Roads,
the existing intersection of Pinjar Road and Yandella Promenade. This is
rationalising the MRS zoning with what has actually been developed.
· Proposal
22: Involves rationalising the MRS boundaries of the Other Regional Roads
reserves and Industrial zones with the existing property boundaries of Ocean
Reef Road and Gnangara Road, in the eastern part of Wangara.
The WAPC’s ‘Amendment Report’ includes
further information describing each proposal, and the reason for it. An
extract from the Amendment Report which deals with Proposals 17 to 22 is
provided at Attachment 10.
The MRS Amendment has been released for public comment from
13 October 2015 to 18 December 2015.
It should be noted that the WAPC has decided that this MRS
Amendment is to be processed as a ‘minor’ amendment, meaning that
it will not be placed before Parliament, as occurs with ‘major’
amendments.
Consultation
The WAPC is now inviting public comment on the proposed MRS
Amendment. As part of this, it has written to all landowners whose
properties are directly affected by any of the Proposals. However, it
does not write to adjoining landowners.
Proposal 18 involves rezoning to Urban of a 2,850m2
area in the north-east corner of the Girrawheen Senior High School site.
This area is currently bushland and the proposed change to Urban zoning to
enable housing development is something adjoining landowners would likely want
to be aware of and potentially make submissions on. Administration has
therefore written to landowners directly adjacent to Proposal 18 informing them
on the matter. While these landowners were advised to make submissions to
the WAPC, if they wished, they were also invited to advise the City of their
views on the matter so that Council could be made aware of nearby
residents’ views in considering the matter. No advice has been
received from any landowners in response to this invitation.
Furthermore in preparing the City’s submission on this
proposal Administration has consulted with the DoE to determine their position
on the matter. The advice received from the DoE has formed the basis for the
City’s comments on proposal 18.
It may be noted that in the information included in Attachment
10 regarding this proposal, it states that:
“A structure plan will be
prepared (including public consultation) to guide the development of the
land.”
Comment
Proposal Nos. 17 and 19 to 22 are not considered to raise
any issues of concern for the City and it is recommended that the Council
advise in its submission that it has no objection to those Proposals.
Proposal No. 18 does, however, raise a number of matters
which have required investigation, and these are listed below:
1. While
the MRS amendment report states that this land is superfluous to the
requirements of the Department of Education (DoE), enquiries have been made to
DoE to confirm whether this is still the case, considering the proposed
increases to R-Coding for the Girrawheen-Koondoola areas.
DoE
has recently raised concerns about the capacity of primary school sites in the
area to cope with likely increased primary student numbers, and Administration
needed to know whether a similar concern existed for high schools in the
area. In the course of making these enquiries, DoE has advised that it
has made a submission to the WAPC on Proposal No. 18 of this MRS amendment.
DoE
has advised that in its submission it has referred to how, in 2007, it received
a request from the then Principal of the high school to have this part of the
school site excised and sold, to provide funds for the school to fund various
projects. The Department of Housing (DoH) subsequently lodged an
expression of interest to purchase the land, and requested the WAPC to amend
the MRS.
In
2014, the government amended the previous funding guidelines, meaning that any
funds raised from the sale of the land would be directed into the government
Consolidated Account, rather than necessarily directly benefiting the
Girrawheen Senior High School.
Due
to this change in what would happen to the funds concerned, the possibility of
a new facility being built on the site, and a review of the initial rationale,
the current Principal and the School Council have now requested that this
disposal process be stopped. Accordingly, in its submission DoE has
advised that it is requesting DoH to cease its intentions regarding rezoning
and acquisition of the site.
It
is apparent from the above that the information provided in the MRS Amendment
Report regarding this area being superfluous to the DoE requirements, and the
proceeds from the sale providing finance to the school, are based on early
dealings between the parties involved and have now been superseded by more
recent events as indicated above.
It
should also be noted that while the matter of possible implications of
increased R-Codings for the general area has apparently not been specifically
mentioned in the DoE submission, DoE has advised in discussing this matter that
this has also been a consideration for it in seeking to retain this site.
Given
the above, it is recommended that Council object to Proposal No. 18.
2. The
vegetation on the site is mapped as “Karrakatta Central and South
Complex” of which less than 10% of the pre-European extent is currently
protected within the City of Wanneroo. This type of vegetation complex is
therefore identified as a ‘high priority’ for further protection
under the City’s Local Biodiversity Strategy.
However,
the vegetation on this site is in a semi-degraded state. The site has
been heavily disturbed, probably due to foot traffic associated with the
school, and is heavily infested with weeds. It is therefore considered
that the conservation values present on this site do not warrant disallowance
of any development on the site, but instead require measures to be taken as
part of the future planning and development of the site to appropriately have
regard to those values, by way of:
· A detailed
flora/fauna survey;
· An
arborist’s report on the trees on the site to determine which should be
retained, and how they are to be maintained;
· Compliance with
Australian Standards in protecting retained trees during development;
· Trapping of fauna.
Statutory
Compliance
Should this MRS Amendment be approved and take effect, then
the proposed new regional reserves will automatically also take effect on DPS
2.
For proposed changes from regional reserve to zones, the
City will be required (under the Planning and Development Act 2005) to prepare
amendments to DPS 2 to zone the land to be consistent with the new MRS zoning.
For proposed changes to Urban zones (including for Proposal
No. 18), the WAPC can also concurrently amend DPS 2 to rezone the sites to
Urban Development. The MRS Amendment Report states that the WAPC will consider
the matter of concurrent local scheme amendments after all submissions have
been received. If it is considering any concurrent amendments, it will
presumably consult with local governments at that time.
Although WAPC is yet to consult with the City on this
matter, the City can still request the WAPC to automatically amend DPS 2.
In the case of Proposal 21, as the two small areas of land proposed to be
rezoned from regional reserve to Urban are surrounded by land currently zoned
Urban Development under DPS 2, and already subject to approved Structure Plans,
it is recommended that Council make this request for Proposal 21.
For Proposal 18, as the surrounding residential area is
currently zoned Residential under DPS 2, it would be preferable for this site
to also be rezoned to Residential, if the MRS rezoning to Urban is
approved. If the site was automatically rezoned to Urban Development,
this would require that a Structure Plan be prepared for the site, and this is
not considered warranted for such a small site. A Local Development Plan
would be more appropriate. It is therefore not recommended that Proposal
18 be requested for automatic rezoning to Urban Development under DPS 2, should
the site be rezoned to Urban.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment
- A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally
Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of
environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future
generations to enjoy”
“4 Civic
leadership – working with others to ensure the best use of our resources
4.1 Listening
and leading – be strong advocates in the community’s
interest”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Stakeholder Relationships
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Manage
|
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this
report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic
risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to
improve the existing management systems.
Policy
Implications
Nil.
Financial
Implications
Proposal Nos. 18, 20, 21 and 22 involve changes from
reserves to zones under the MRS. If these changes take effect, then DPS 2
will require amendment to ensure consistency with the new MRS zoning.
The DPS 2 amendment required for Proposal 18, if that takes
effect, is anticipated to involve an application being made by a proponent who
will then meet costs involved.
For Proposals 20 and 22, this is likely to involve an
omnibus amendment to DPS 2 needing to be done by the City, at its cost.
This cost would be met through normal operational budget provision.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADVISES the Western Australian Planning
Commission that Council:-
1. Has
no OBJECTION to Proposal Nos. 17, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Metropolitan Region
Scheme Amendment 1292/57: North-East and North-West District Omnibus 1.
2. DOES
NOT SUPPORT Proposal No. 18, which proposes to rezone the north-east corner of
the Girrawheen Senior High School site to Urban, because:
a) This
City has been advised that the School Principal, the School Council of the
Girrawheen Senior High School and the Department of Education no longer support
this proposal, and it is understood that the Department of Education has made a
submission on this proposed MRS amendment which explains the reasons for this
position.
b) The
proposed increase in R-Codings for the Girrawheen-Koondoola areas is likely to
lead to increased demands being placed upon all schools in these areas.
3. REQUESTS
that for Proposal 21, the two areas to be rezoned to Urban be concurrently
zoned as Urban Development under District Planning Scheme No. 2 under Section
126 (3) of the Planning and Development Act 2005.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Primary regional roads reservation Proposal 17 (1)
|
15/514745
|
|
|
2.
|
Urban Zone (2)
|
15/514749
|
|
|
3.
|
WSD public purposes Proposal 18 (3)
|
15/514754
|
|
|
4.
|
Rural zone Proposal 19 (4)
|
15/514762
|
|
|
5.
|
Other/Urban zone Proposal 20 (5)
|
15/514767
|
|
|
6.
|
Industrial/other Proposal 22 (6)
|
15/514773
|
|
|
7.
|
Excluded areas Proposals 17 & 19 (7)
|
15/514784
|
|
|
8.
|
Excluded areas Proposal 20-21 (8)
|
15/514792
|
|
|
9.
|
Excluded areas Proposal 18 & 22 (9)
|
15/514797
|
|
|
10.
|
WAPC Proposals to MRS 1292/57 (10)
|
15/514661
|
|
Development Applications
PS07-12/15 Consideration
of Development Application DA2015/1780 Single House Addition (Patio) at Lot 180
(97) Kemp Street, Pearsall
File Ref: DA2015/1780
– 15/511422
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a development application (DA2015/1780) for a
Single House Addition (Patio) at 97 Kemp Street, Pearsall.
|
Applicant
|
Wanneroo Patios
|
|
Owner
|
Sean and Lisa Brooker
|
|
Location
|
Lot 180 (97) Kemp Street, Pearsall
|
|
Site Area
|
656m2
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Residential
|
Background
On 18 September 2015, the City received a development
application for a Single House Addition (Patio) for Lot 180 (97) Kemp Street,
Pearsall (subject site). The subject site is 656m2 in area and is
zoned Residential with a density coding of R20 under the City of
Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). A location plan of the
subject lot is included in Attachment 1.
Detail
The details of the proposed Patio are as follows:
· Total
length is 15.4m and is comprised of one gable roof section at 11.6m in length
and one flat roof section at 3.8m in length;
· The
flat roof section of the Patio is composed of clear panels;
· The
Patio is a minimum height of 2.2m and a maximum height of 2.86m;
· Posts
setback 0.1m from the eastern boundary; and
· Roofline
setback 1m from the eastern boundary.
The posts and roofline setbacks are variations to the
Deemed-to-Comply provisions of Clause 5.1.3 of the Residential Design Codes
(R-Codes) which require a 1.5m setback from the adjoining boundary. The posts
have been proposed to be setback 0.1m from the eastern boundary to allow access
between the existing garage and outbuilding. If the posts were setback 1.5m
from the boundary, the posts would impede the access from the garage to the
outbuilding.
The site and elevation plans of the proposal are included in
Attachment 2.
Consultation
A letter of objection from the adjoining landowners at Lot
179 (99) Kemp Street, Pearsall was included when the application was submitted.
As no other adjoining properties are affected by the setback variation
associated with the proposed Patio, no further consultation was required.
The objector raised concerns with regards to a loss of
natural sunlight to the property. A more detailed discussion of the issue
raised is provided in the Comment section.
Comment
Delegation to Determine Application
Pursuant to Part 8.3 (b) of the City’s Delegation of
Authority Register and Sub-Delegation Authority Register, the application may
be considered under delegation if, it is the view of the Operations Manager
Planning and Development Services or Director Planning and Sustainability, that
the objections do not raise relevant planning considerations that cannot be
specifically addressed or overcome by modifications to the proposal, or
imposition of appropriate conditions of approval.
In this instance, Administration is of the opinion that the
objection raises relevant planning considerations in relation to the potential
restriction of direct solar access for the adjoining property resulting from
the Patio. Administration does not consider that this can be addressed by
modification or imposing conditions. Therefore, the application cannot be
considered under delegated authority and must be determined by Council.
Assessment of Application
In accordance with Part 2 of the
R-Codes, if a proposal does not meet the Deemed-to-Comply provisions, the City
is to exercise its judgement to consider the merits of the proposal having
regard to the relevant Design Principles. The Patio does not meet the
Deemed-to-Comply provisions of Clause 5.1.3 of the R-Codes and therefore has been
assessed against the corresponding Design Principles, as detailed in the table
below.
|
Design Principles – Clause 5.1.3 P3.1
|
Administration Comments
|
|
Reduce impacts of building bulk on adjoining
properties.
|
The impact of building bulk on the
adjoining property is considered minimal given that the Patio will be
adjacent to the side of the adjoining property which does not comprise of
active open spaces.
Building bulk generally arises from large
solid walls and structures that impact the amenity of the adjoining
properties. The Patio is unenclosed along the shared boundary with the
objector and therefore reduces negative visual impacts. The posts are located
0.1m from the shared boundary however they are not considered a large solid
structure and therefore do not cause significant impacts relating to building
bulk.
|
|
Provide adequate direct sun and ventilation to the
building and open space on the site and adjoining properties.
|
The Patio is unenclosed on the northern
and eastern sides of the structure and will therefore not restrict
ventilation to the building or open spaces of the subject site and adjoining
property.
The subject site has a north-south
orientation and therefore the shadow cast from the proposed Patio will
predominately fall over the subject lot. Furthermore, the clear roof panels
of the Patio will provide opportunity for additional solar access to the
adjoining property.
As such, direct sunlight to the building
and open space of the adjoining property will still be available.
|
|
Minimise the extent of overlooking and
resultant loss of privacy on adjoining properties.
|
The finished floor level of the Patio is
proposed to be the same as the existing ground level. Therefore, the proposed
Patio will not result in overlooking to the adjoining property and the
privacy of the adjoining property will be maintained by the existing boundary
fence.
|
In light of the above, the proposed setback variation for
the Patio is considered to meet the relevant Design Principles of the R-Codes.
The Patio also satisfies all other requirements of the R-Codes.
Conclusion
The Patio meets the relevant
Design Principles of the R-Codes. Administration considers that the issues
raised in the letter of objection have been addressed and no modification to
the proposal is required. It is therefore recommended that Council approves the
proposed Patio at Lot 180 (97) Kemp Street, Pearsall.
Statutory
Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with
District Planning Scheme No. 2 and Residential Design Codes of Western
Australia.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the development application for the Single House Addition (Patio) at Lot 180
(97) Kemp Street, Pearsall, as shown in Attachment 2, pursuant to Clause
68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning
Scheme No. 2 and subject to compliance with the following conditions: -
a) This
approval only relates to the proposed Single House Addition (Patio), as
highlighted on the approved plan. It does not relate to any other development
on the lot.
b) All
stormwater shall be collected and retained on site.
2. ADVISES
the submitter of this decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - 97 Kemp St, Pearsall
|
15/519686
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Site and Elevation Plan - 97 Kemp
Street, Pearsall
|
15/536283
|
Minuted
|
PS08-12/15 Retrospective
Single House Additions (Patios, Outbuilding and Ancillary Accommodation) at Lot
1 (37) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen
File Ref: DA2015/1638
– 15/518881
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a development application seeking retrospective
planning approval for two patios, outbuilding and ancillary accommodation to an
existing Single House at Lot 1 (37) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen.
|
Applicant
|
Buildinglines
|
|
Owner
|
Velimir Savic and Jelena Savic
|
|
Location
|
Lot 1 (37) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen
|
|
Site Area
|
526m2
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Residential R20
|
Background
On 1 July 2015, the City received an anonymous enquiry
regarding the development on the subject site. After determining that the
existing two patios, outbuilding and ancillary accommodation were unauthorised
structures, the City contacted the landowners of 37 Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen to
request that the structures be removed from the property or if they wished to
retain them, a development application is to be submitted to the City to seek
retrospective planning approval. This approach is consistent with the
City’s Local Planning Policy 4.14 – Compliance.
It is noted that a retrospective development application
incurs a fee of three times that of a standard development application. This
increased fee is considered to encompass the processing fee of the development
application and a penalty for developing without the required approvals first
being obtained from the City.
On 2 September 2015, the City received a development
application seeking retrospective planning approval for the patios, outbuilding
and ancillary accommodation as additions to the single house located on the
subject site.
Detail
The subject site is 526m2 in area and is zoned
Residential R20 under the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS
2). A location plan is included as Attachment 1.
The plans depicting the subject development are included as Attachment
2. The details of the development are as follows:
Patios
As indicated on the plans there are two patios marked as
Patio A and Patio B.
Patio A is 13.35 metres (m) in length, 5.16m in width, 2.3m
in height and is setback 0.79m from the northern boundary and 0.69m from the
southern boundary.
Patio B is 3m in length, 4.36m in width, 2.4m in height and
is setback 0.4m from the southern boundary.
Outbuilding
The outbuilding is 4m in length, 3.98m in width, 2.7m in
height and is setback 0.67m from the northern boundary and 0.35m from the
western boundary.
Ancillary Accommodation
The ancillary accommodation which has a total area of 30.86m2
is 7.08m in length, 4.36m in width, 2.6m in height and is setback 0.88m from
the southern boundary.
The abovementioned setbacks are a variation to the
Deemed-to-Comply provisions of Clause 5.1.3 of the Residential Design Codes
(R-Codes) which requires a 1.5m setback for the patios and ancillary
accommodation and a 1m setback for the outbuilding.
Consultation
Pursuant to Part 4.2 of the R-Codes, neighbour consultation
was undertaken by the City by writing to the affected landowners. The
advertising period was for 14 days commencing on 1 October 2015 and concluding
on 15 October 2015. One submission raising objections to the proposal was
received from the landowners at Lot 2 (37A) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen (adjoining
landowner). The summary of submission and Administration’s comments are
included in Attachment 3. Administration assessment and consideration of
the proposal is included in the Comment section.
Comment
Delegation to Determine Application
Pursuant to Part 8.3(b) of the City’s Delegated
Authority Register and Sub-Delegated Authority Register, the application may be
considered under delegation if, it is the view of the Operations Manager
Planning and Development Services or Director, Planning and Sustainability,
that the objections do not raise relevant planning considerations that cannot
be specifically addressed or overcome by modifications to the proposal, or
imposition of appropriate conditions of approval.
In this instance, Administration is of the opinion that the
objection raises relevant planning considerations in relation to the building
bulk and scale of the proposed patios and ancillary accommodation.
Administration does not consider that these can be addressed by modification or
imposition of conditions. Therefore, the application cannot be considered under
delegated authority and must be determined by Council.
Assessment of Application
In accordance with Part 2 of the R-Codes, if a proposal does
not meet the Deemed-to-Comply provisions, the City is to exercise its judgement
to consider the merits of the proposal having regard to the relevant Design
Principles. As the patios, outbuilding and ancillary accommodation do not meet
the Deemed-to-Comply provisions of Clauses 5.1.3, 5.4.3 and 5.5.1 of the
R-Codes, they have been assessed against the corresponding Design Principles,
as detailed in the table below.
|
Design Principles – Clause 5.1.3
|
Administration Comments
|
|
Reduce impacts of
building bulk on adjoining properties
|
The impact of building bulk on the adjoining property is
considered negligible for the following reasons:
· The subject site
will result in approximately 60% open space which exceeds the 50%
requirement, and as such, reducing the impact of building bulk across the
site.
· The height of
the proposed developments are not considered to adversely impact on the amenity
of the adjoining properties as they have a maximum wall height of 2.7m and
predominantly have flat roofs further reducing any potential impact.
· It is noted that
the boundary fence between the properties is only 1.2m in height (height
confirmed by site visit) which is less than what is considered a standard
fence height as defined in the City’s Private Property Local Laws 2001
being between 1.75m and 1.85m
Patios:
· The impact of
the patios is negligible as they are both unenclosed and thus, reducing the
impact of building bulk.
Ancillary Accommodation:
· The ancillary
accommodation has a wall length of 7.08m and is setback 0.88m. When
considering that this wall can be built up to the boundary it is the position
of Administration that the setback, although a reduction from the
requirements, will have a lesser impact than a boundary wall.
|
|
Provide adequate direct
sun and ventilation to the building and open spaces on the site and adjoining
properties
|
Both the subject site and the adjoining property have
their outdoor living areas located on the northern aspect of the property and
each have over 100m2 of outdoor living area which is open to the
winter sun and ventilation. As such, it is considered that the proposed
structures do not compromise the ability for direct sun and ventilation to
the building and open spaces.
The existing dividing fence casts a shadow of
approximately 33.84m2 onto the adjoining property on 21 June. The
proposed developments would result in additional 12.91m2 of overshadowing.
As such, 12% of the adjoining site would be overshadowed which complies with
the overshadowing provisions of the R-Codes, as 25% of overshadowing is
permitted for lots coded R20. In light of this, it is considered that the
overshadowing will not compromise direct sun and ventilation to the site.
|
|
Minimise the extent of
overlooking and resultant loss of privacy on adjoining properties
|
The finished floor levels of the proposed developments are
not elevated 0.5m above natural ground level and therefore, the proposal is
compliant with the visual privacy requirements of the R-Codes as per Clause
5.4.1.
As mentioned above the subject and adjoining properties
are separated by a sub-standard fence (1.2m in height). Had the dividing
fence been of typical height ranging from 1.75m to 1.85, the major opening of
the ancillary accommodation would be screened and as such, would minimise the
extent of overlooking into the adjoining property.
|
|
Design
Principles – Clause 5.4.3
|
Administration
Comments
|
|
Outbuildings that do
not detract from the streetscape or the visual amenity of residents or
neighbouring properties.
|
The proposed outbuildings are not visible
from the street and will therefore have no impact on the streetscape. As
outlined above, the outbuilding is considered to have a negligible impact on
adjoining properties in terms of building bulk as discussed above (Design
Principles for Clause 5.1.3). Overlooking and loss of privacy will not result
from this outbuilding as it is non-habitable and does not have any windows
facing the adjoining properties.
|
|
Design
Principles – Clause 5.5.1
|
Administration
Comments
|
|
Ancillary dwelling for
people who live either independently or semi-dependently to the residents of
the single house, sharing some site facilities and services and without
compromising the amenity of surrounding properties.
|
The ancillary accommodation is self-contained and can be
used independently to the residents of the single house. The ancillary
accommodation is considered to not compromise the amenity of the surrounding
residents as it is 31.9m2 and complies with all of the
requirements (apart from the setbacks discussed above) of the R-Codes. The
ancillary accommodation is considered to be consistent with the built form of
the locality and will not detract from the residential setting of the
locality.
|
Conclusion
In light of the above assessment, the proposed patios,
outbuilding and ancillary accommodation are considered to meet the relevant
Design Principles and satisfy all other relevant Deemed-to-Comply provisions of
the R-Codes. Therefore, Administration recommends that Council approve the
patios, outbuilding and ancillary accommodation at Lot 1 (37) Hadleigh Way,
Girrawheen.
Statutory
Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the
City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the Residential
Design Codes of Western Australia.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
In accordance with the current Compliance Policy, the City
may take various actions to deal with a non-compliant development. The initial
steps seek to bring the matter into compliance. Where the landowner does not
act to bring the matter into compliance, the City can take further action such
as issuing a Directions Notice and/or Prosecution. In this case, the landowner
has agreed to address the non-compliance by seeking retrospective approval. If
the application is approved by Council, it is not proposed to take any further
action.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the development application for Single House Additions (Two Patios, Outbuilding
and Ancillary Accommodation) at Lot 1 (37) Hadleigh Way, Girrawheen, as shown
in Attachment 2, Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of the
City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 and subject to compliance with
the following conditions:-
a) This
approval only relates to the proposed Single House Additions (Patios,
Outbuilding and Ancillary Accommodation), as shown on the approved plan
(Attachment 2). It does not relate to any other development on the lot.
b) This
approval is only valid from the date of this decision and does not
retrospectively authorise any previous unapproved development on the subject
site.
c) The
Outbuilding shall be used for purposes that are ancillary to the residential
use of the property, and shall not be used for commercial/industrial purposes
or for human habitation.
d) All
stormwater shall be collected and retained on site.
2. ADVISES
the submitter of this decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1: Location Plan - 37 Hadleigh Way
Girrawheen
|
15/540230
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2: Plans and Elevations - 37 Hadleigh Way
Girrawheen
|
15/520256
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment No. 3 - Summary of Submission - DA2015
1598 37 Hadleigh Way Girrawheen
|
15/541011
|
|
PS09-12/15 Reconsideration
of proposed drive-through addition to an approved Liquor Store at Lot 1031 (2)
Captiva Approach, Butler
File Ref: DA2014/1895
– 15/495977
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To respond to the invitation from the State Administrative
Tribunal (SAT) for Council to reconsider its decision from 21 July 2015
to refuse a development application for a proposed drive-through addition to an
approved Liquor Store at Lot 1031 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler.
|
Applicant
|
The Gastevski Group
|
|
Owner
|
Tango Investments
|
|
Location
|
Lot 1061 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler
|
|
Site Area
|
15,907m2
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
|
ASP 27 Zoning
|
Commercial
|
Background
On 9 October 2014, Tango Investments (WA) Pty Ltd submitted
an application to the City for a drive-through addition to the approved Liquor
Store. The application was to be presented to Council at its meeting of
28 April 2015 for determination, however, was withdrawn for the purposes of
readvertising after discussion at Council’s Briefing Session on 21 April
2015 where a concern was raised that the use of the word existing in the
advertisement could have misled members of the public to think that the Liquor
Store was already operational. The proposal was readvertised from 28
April 2015 to 20 May 2015. The proposal was presented to Council at its
meeting of 21 July 2015 where Council resolved as follows:
“That Council:-
1. REFUSES
the development application for a drive-through addition to an approved Liquor
Store at Lot 1061 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler for the following reasons:
a) The
proposal will exacerbate an existing parking shortfall by seven bays. Council
is not prepared to vary the parking requirements of District Planning Scheme
No. 2 or to support the area within the drive-through addition towards the
provision of on-site parking bays; and
b) In
considering a request to vary the car parking standards, the Council is
entitled to give due regard to concerns about this proposal raised by adjoining
residents and schools, in accordance with sub-clause 6.8 of District Planning
Scheme No. 2; and
2. ADVISES
the submitters of this decision.”
A copy of the plans refused by Council are provided as Attachment
1.
The applicant was aggrieved by Council’s decision and
subsequently lodged an application for review with the SAT. A Directions
Hearing was held on 2 September 2015, resulting in an on-site mediation session
occurring on 1 October 2015.
Pursuant to Local Planning Policy 4.17 State Administrative
Tribunal (LPP 4.17), Administration engaged the services of an independent
planning consultant - Joe Algeri (Altus Planning and Appeals) to represent
Council’s decision. Following this mediation, the SAT issued orders
inviting Council to reconsider its decision to refuse the application, on or
before 10 November 2015. SAT also ordered further mediation be adjourned
until 20 November 2015, pending Council’s reconsideration of this matter.
The orders issued by the SAT following the on-site mediation
on 1 October 2015 required the applicant to submit additional information to
the City as outlined below:
· Signage
strategy;
· Delivery
Management statement;
· Overall
car parking/landuse plan outlining current uses on-site;
· Amended
architectural drawings to remove the browsing lane from the drive-through
addition; and
· Safety
analysis of vehicles exiting the drive-through addition and an analysis of the
possibility of reversing the direction of vehicle traffic through the
drive-through.
An assessment of this information was undertaken by
Administration and concerns were identified in relation to the overall parking
shortfall on the site, direction of traffic flow through the drive-through and
the delivery management statement. Consequently, the applicant sought to defer
the reconsideration and a further mediation session was scheduled to allow
these concerns to be mediated. Accordingly, a mediation session was held on 12
November 2015, after which the SAT issued orders for the applicant to provide
additional information to address the identified concerns and inviting Council
to reconsider its decision on or before 8 December 2015.
Detail
The revised proposal submitted by the applicant proposes the
following changes to the proposal refused by Council on 21 July 2015:
· Removal
of dedicated browse lane so both drive-through lanes will be used for
drive-through service only;
· Replacement
of all parking bays which are required to be removed to accommodate the
drive-through facility to alternative locations within the subject site (10
bays) and the inclusion of one additional bay; and
· No
deliveries for the development will occur between 4.30pm to 7.00pm on a Friday
evening, which is the peak demand period for a drive-through Liquor Store.
A copy of the revised proposal submitted by the applicant is
provided as Attachment 2.
In addition, the proponent submitted a signage strategy for
the Liquor Store following the first mediation session for the City’s
consideration together with the revised proposal. The strategy simply
incorporates excerpts from the City’s Signs Local Planning Policy (SLPP)
in relation to the number and location, use of signs, types of signs, content,
colours and materials, dimensions, and planning approval and process. The
proponent has advised that the details of the signage are yet to be finalised.
Consultation
The revised proposal has not been advertised for public
comment as it does not deviate significantly from the proposal previously
subject to public consultation. The proposal refused by Council was
advertised on two separate occasions – initially from 7 November 2014 to
1 December 2014 and then again from 28 April 2015 to 20 May 2015.
Comment
Car Parking/On-Site Land Uses
One of Council’s reasons for refusing the application
was that it would have exacerbated an existing on-site parking shortfall by a
further seven bays. The applicant has submitted a revised plan which
demonstrates how the carpark can be reconfigured to provide the bays which will
be removed to allow for construction of the drive-through in an alternative
location. Specifically, the proposed drive-through requires 10 on-site
bays to be removed and the applicant has proposed to construct 11 bays on site,
as shown in Attachment 2. Therefore, the proposal will no longer
exacerbate the existing parking shortfall of 48 bays but rather reduce the
existing shortfall by one bay. It is noted that consistent with Council’s
previous resolution, this does not include four bays within the drive-through.
Safety Analysis
The applicant has reviewed the safety of the car park in the
vicinity of the proposed drive-through exit following concerns about safety of
pedestrians and reversing vehicles. The revised plans have relocated the bay
closest to the drive-through exit to the row of parking in front of the
Pharmacy (western face of the supermarket building).
A concern was raised through public submissions about the
possibility of vehicles queuing for the drive-through and obstructing the
crossover access to the Centre from Tarpon Link. In response to this
concern, the applicant has deleted the browse lane facility, meaning that the
drive-through lanes will operate for drive-through service only. Administration
agrees that this change will reduce the potential for queuing vehicles to block
the access, particularly during the peak demand period.
The safety analysis also discusses the possibility of
reversing the direction of traffic using the drive-through. This would
result in queuing vehicles stacking within the existing carpark thereby
negating the possibility of the Tarpon Link entrance being blocked. The
safety analysis states the following in relation to this matter:
‘the
reversal of the drive-through facility will result in effectively doubling the
traffic generation within the existing car park to the west of the proposal
with vehicles required to enter the site and ‘double back’
resulting in additional circulation and exposure with limited benefits.
The proposed layout with traffic entering in a line haul manner directly via
Tarpon Link in a westerly direction and exiting into the car park will result
in lower exposure and less conflict between vehicular movements on the site and
is therefore considered to be the safer and more efficient option.’
At the mediation session held on 12 November 2015, the
impacts of reversing the direction of traffic were discussed and the applicant
has since provided further justification stating that:
‘If
the direction of the drive-through was to be reversed (i.e. west to east
movement) there would need to be, in effect, two counter areas or a redesign of
the Liquor Store. This will result in poorer store functionality and mean that
staff would need to either monitor two counter areas or monitor the entrance to
the Liquor Store and the counter area. This may compromise security and harm
amelioration (responsible service of alcohol management).
Furthermore, if the
drive-through was reversed it will result in increasing the risk and exposure
on the site by requiring vehicles to undertake a 180 degree turn near the
western end of the drive-through in order to enter in an easterly direction or
‘doubling back’ resulting in additional circulation and exposure.
This will also potentially cause constraints to vehicles attempting to utilise
the right-angle parking adjacent to the western end of the drive-through. The
proposed layout with traffic entering in a line haul manner directly via Tarpon
Link in a westerly direction and exiting into the car park will result in lower
exposure and less conflict between vehicular movements on the site and is
therefore considered to be the safer and more efficient option.’
In consideration of the above, Administration is of the view
that the direction of the traffic for the drive-through addition as originally
proposed is appropriate and therefore capable of approval. The purpose of this
discussion was to be assured that due consideration had been given to all
options and clearly, there are disadvantages to reversing the flow of traffic.
Council should still be aware that there may be some instances where the
vehicle queue may extend to the Tarpon Link entrance, however, Administration
considers this would not be a regular occurrence and it would be unlikely to
cause a significant detriment to the flow of traffic.
Signage Strategy
A concern that was raised during the public consultation
period related to signage for the Liquor Store. As a consequence of
discussions at the on-site mediation, the applicant has submitted a signage
strategy. The submitted signage strategy simply outlines signage
requirements contained within the SLPP. Signs which comply with the SLPP
do not require planning approval and therefore the submission of a signage
strategy simply re-iterating policy requirements lacks any detail of the
signage proposal. Council should impose a condition requiring the applicant to
submit a development application prior to the erection of any signage
associated with the drive-through addition if it is inclined to support the
development.
Management of Deliveries
The peak demand period for a drive-through Liquor Store is
on a Friday afternoon (4.30pm to 7.00pm). Given the proximity of the entry to
the drive-through this could result in a conflict between queuing vehicles and
delivery vehicles for the supermarket in the shopping centre during this
timeframe. Deliveries for the supermarket are generally outside of these hours.
Notwithstanding this and through the mediation process, the applicant agreed to
a prohibition on deliveries occurring during the Friday afternoon peak period
(4:30pm to 7:00pm) to eliminate any risk of conflict between queuing vehicles
and delivery vehicles. This has been recommended as a condition of approval,
should Council resolve to approve the proposal.
Conclusion
The orders prepared by the SAT invite Council to review its
previous decision. Under Section 31(2) of the State Administrative Tribunal
Act 2004, and in response to the invitation of the SAT, Council may do one
of the following further to a previous decision:
(a) Affirm
the decision;
(b) Vary
the decision; or
(c) Set
aside the decision and substitute its new decision.
Council is reminded that if it selected option (a) and
affirmed its previous decision to refuse the proposal, it will not have the
ability to impose conditions in the event the matter progresses to a hearing
and the SAT determines the application. Approval by Council provides the
best opportunity to ensure that suitable conditions are imposed on the
development for future management of the land use.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the
City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy
- Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and
employment.
3.2 Growing
Business - Our community is a preferred place for business to locate and grow.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
Given Council’s decision varied significantly from
Administration’s recommendation, an independent planning consultant has
been engaged to represent Council consistent with LPP 4.17.
Financial
Implications
Financial implications would be dependent on the decision of
Council and the applicant's further action arising there from.
Should the matter proceed to a Full Hearing at the SAT, the
City is likely to incur further costs in legal and expert fees. These costs do
not include the substantial Administration time involved to date and which will
be further required should the matter proceed to Full Hearing.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADVISES The Gastevski Group and the State
Administrative Tribunal that, pursuant to Section 31 of the State
Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, Council has reconsidered its decision of 21
July 2015 relating to refusal issued for a drive-through addition to an
approved Liquor Store at Lot 1081 (2) Captiva Approach, Butler and
RESOLVES to set aside its previous refusal decision (PS04-07/15), and APPROVES
the revised drive-through addition to an approved Liquor Store proposal subject
to the following conditions to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning
Implementation:-
1. This
approval only relates to the drive-through addition to the approved Liquor
Store and modifications to the car-park as shown on the approved plans. It does
not relate to any other development on the lot;
2. The
drive-through lanes shall operate as drive-through service lanes only and shall
not be used for the purpose of browse lanes, storage or be obstructed in any
way at any time;
3. No
deliveries to the Liquor Store or the Supermarket shall occur during the period
between 4.30pm to 7.00pm on a Friday, unless otherwise approved by the City;
4. No
signage shall be erected for, or on, the drive-through addition without further
approval from the City; and
5. Proposed
modifications to parking areas and driveways shall be designed and constructed
in accordance with the Australian Standard for Offstreet Carparking (AS2890),
and shall be drained, sealed and marked.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Refused Plans
|
15/417241
|
|
|
2.
|
Revised Plans
|
15/555827
|
Minuted
|
Regulatory Services
PS10-12/15 Application
to Retain Existing Front Boundary Fences at Lot 106 and Lot 107 Safari Place,
Carabooda
File Ref: 3601
– 15/553712
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Existing Structure Applications for
limestone front fences at Lot 106 (102) and Lot 107 (108) Safari Place,
Carabooda (the Properties).
Background
On 8 August 2014 the owners of the Properties submitted
existing structure applications in relation to the limestone front fences that
had been constructed without any valid building permit see Attachments 1 and
2. On 19 November 2014 the applications were refused for the
following reasons:
· the
applications did not comply with the Third Schedule of the City's Private
Property Local Law 2001 (Local Law); and
· the
information requested by the City had not been received (namely amended plans
to comply with the Local Law.
On 11 March 2015 the City issued Building Orders
to the owners of the Properties due to failure by the owners to either amend
the front fences to comply with the Local Law or demolish, dismantle and remove
the front fences in their entirety.
Following failure by the owners to comply with the
abovementioned Building Orders, the City’s then Director City Business
approved a request to commence prosecution.
On 23 June 2015 the City received ten notices from
the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) in respect of reviewing building
orders issued by the City, two of which were in relation to the front fences at
the Properties. On 30 September 2015 the City attended a mediation
conference at the SAT, which was adjourned to conclude the mediation conference
onsite at the Properties on 15 October 2015. This meeting occurred on 15
October 2015 and resulted in the following agreement:
· the owners of
Properties would submit new existing structure applications for the front
fences.
· the plans provided
as part of the applications would detail amendments to the front fences to
provide various visually permeable openings; and
· the City’s
Administration would present the existing structure applications to Council for
consideration.
The SAT matter was adjourned to 16 December 2015.
On 6 November 2015 the City received the existing
structure applications in relation to the front fences at the Properties (Existing
Structure Applications) which included visual representations of the
visually permeable openings in the front fences as detailed in Attachments 3
and 4.
Detail
The Properties are zoned “Rural Resource”.
Section 3.2(1)(c) of the Local Law stipulates that a
sufficient fence on a rural lot is one that is constructed and maintained in
accordance with the specifications and requirements of the Third Schedule.
The Third Schedule of the Local Law states that:
"Subject to clause 5.2
relating to estate fences, a sufficient fence on a Rural Lot for the purpose of
the Dividing Fences Act is a fence of posts and wire construction, the minimum
specifications for which are –
(a) Wire
shall be high tensile wire and not less than 2.5mm. A minimum of five wires
shall be used, these are generally with the lower wires spaced closer together
than the higher wires so as to prevent smaller stock passing through, and
connected to posts in all cases, and threaded through 12mm holes in posts to
all fences;
(b) Posts
shall be of indigenous timber or other suitable material including timber
impregnated with a termite and fungicidal preservative cut not less than 1.8m
long x 100mm diameter at small end of round or 125mm x 60mm if split or sawn.
(c) Posts
to be set minimum 600mm in the ground and 1.2m above the ground; and
(d) Strainer
posts shall be not less than 2.25m long and 150mm diameter at the small end and
shall be cut from indigenous timber or other suitable material. These shall be
placed a minimum of 1m in the ground.
Permissible Alternative Fences
Permissible alternative fences
apply to front fences only and are not intended for other boundary fences on a
rural lot or special rural lot.
With approval from the local
government, open front fences may be constructed of:
(a) An
open picket timber fence
(b) Brick,
stone or concrete piers with an open infill of timber, wrought iron or tubular
metal; or
(c) Such
other open fencing as approved by the local government."
The Existing Structure Applications submitted by the owners
of the Properties requests approval for a limestone front fence wall with the
following specifications.
· constructed
of reconstituted limestone blocks;
· ranges
in height from 1.7 meters to 2.5 meters (depending on the land level where
measured);
· total
length of approximately 160 meters over the frontage of the two lots; and
· has
two small visually permeable openings proposed.
The existing design of the front fences do not
fall within the permissible design requirements mentioned above.
The Existing Structure Applications propose to
amend the front fences by incorporating two visually permeable openings.
Notwithstanding that the amended front fences would still not comply with Local
Law, this was considered as a compromised outcome as a result of the SAT
mediation conference. The Local Law provides for discretion
in approving non-compliant front fences as section 3.6 – General
discretion of the local government states:
"
(1) The local government may approve the erection of a fence which does not
comply with the requirements of this local law.
(2) In
determining whether to approve the erection of a fence, the local government
may consider, in addition to any other matters that it is authorised to
consider, whether the erection or retention of the fence would have an adverse
effect on:
(a) The
safety or convenience of any person; and
(b) The
safe or convenient use of any land."
Consultation
In accordance with the District Planning Scheme No.2, the
proposed front fence is exempt from requiring Development Approval and
therefore there is no requirement to consult with the adjoining landowners.
Comment
As a result of the SAT mediation
it became clear that the City had to consider exercising its discretion:
1. in issuing the building orders; and
2. to approve the amended front fences in accordance with
section 3.6 of the Local Law.
In relation to the City exercising its discretion
whether or not to issue the building orders in this matter, SAT set out a
number of factors that SAT considered in a previous matter before that are
relevant to this matter:
· the
public interest in enforcement of building standards requires that there should
be compliance with the Building Act and the conditions of any building permit
issued thereunder such that no part of any building or incidental structure is
built outside the boundary of a property;
· regard
should be had for the nature and extent of any burden or other detrimental
effect to land affected by any infringement of a building permit or building
laws generally;
· the
factual circumstances in which the alleged infringement has arisen;
· the
time which has elapsed since the alleged infringement non-conforming structure;
· the
expense and inconvenience which would be involved in removing the structure at
issue; and
· in
applying the above factors, sound common sense should be used to avoid the
unnecessary expenditure of public funds.
The owners of the Properties claim that:
· the
families living in the houses located at the Properties had been subjected to
targeted abuse including having a fire bomb thrown at one of the houses located
on the Properties;
· the
front fences provide a level of safety for the families living in the houses
located at the Properties;
· the
costs in undertaking works to amend the front fences to comply with the Local
Law would be approximately $100,000.
In relation to the City exercising its discretion
to approve the front fences as proposed in the Existing Structures
Applications, the following factors are to be considered:
· Section
3.6(a) of the Local Law refers to "The safety or convenience of any
person" and the owners of the Properties have sighted privacy,
security and noise as the reasons they require and built the front fence.
The front fence is towards the end of Safari Place and this section of Safari
Place is isolated and ends in a cul-de-sac where the Properties are
located. Safari Place currently only provides access to other lots zoned
Rural Resource and is not considered visually intrusive.
· Section
3.6(b) of the Local Law refers to "The safe or convenient use of any
land" and the location of the front fence would not
cause any safety issues relating to sightlines. In accordance with section 3.5
of the Local Law a fence is exempt from requiring a truncation to support
sufficient sightlines where there is a distance of 3.5m between the fence and a
carriageway or footpath. The nearest point the front fence is to the
carriageway is 4.4m. Therefore there is sufficient setback to allow for
sightlines for vehicles accessing the lots surrounding and around the
Properties.
Notwithstanding that the proposed front fences as set out in
the Existing Structure Applications do not comply with the requirements of the
Local Law, Administration recommends Council consider that factors set out in
this report and approve the proposed front fences.
Statutory
Compliance
Approval of the Existing Structure Applications requires the
local government to be satisfied that the fence meets the requirements of
section 3.6 of the Local Law.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe
Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There
are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk
registers which relates to the issues contained in this report.
Policy
Implications
The approval of the proposed front fences has the potential
to set a precedent however this risk is alleviated by the fact that the City is
currently reviewing all its local laws and is intending to make a new Fencing
Local Law. The proposed Fencing Local Law in the final stages of drafting
and will be presented to Council Forum in the first quarter of 2016.
Financial
Implications
Should Council determine not to approve the Existing
Structure Applications for the front fences, it is expected that the matter
would proceed to a hearing before SAT and subject to the outcome the
City’s may be liable for the applicant’s legal costs in addition to
the legal costs incurred by the City.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the Existing Structure
Applications for the limestone front fences at Lot 106 (102) and Lot 107 (108)
Safari Place, Carabooda.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Current Front Fence - 108 Safari Place Carabooda
|
15/554237
|
|
|
2.
|
Current Front Fence - 102 Safari Place Carabooda
|
15/554243
|
|
|
3.
|
Proposed Front Fence - 102 Safari Place Carabooda
|
15/562020
|
|
|
4.
|
Proposed Front Fence - 108 Safari Place Carabooda
|
15/562023
|
|
Other Matters
PS11-12/15 Amberton
Foreshore Management Plan
File Ref: 2442
– 15/519244
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider the draft Amberton Foreshore Management Plan
(FMP).
Background
Council at its Meeting on 15 September 2015 reviewed the
Amberton Foreshore Management Plan (FMP) and moved the following Procedural
Motion:
“That the Report is
referred back to Administration for further assessment of the proposed cafe
site.”
On 18 November 2015 Administration coordinated a site visit
for Elected Members to view potential cafe location options within the Amberton
foreshore. Stockland’s preferred location is shown on their master plan in
close proximity to the ocean (refer to Attachment 1).
The proponent (Stockland) will be required to submit
development applications following Council approval of the FMP, which will be
considered by the City and determined by the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC) for all works carried out within the foreshore reserve.
Council approval of a FMP does not bind Council to approve
any further applications within the area covered by the FMP. Any development
application the City receives will be assessed against the FMP. A copy of the
Amberton FMP has been circulated to Elected Members under separate cover and is
available to members of the public on the City’s website – Council
Meetings Minutes and Agenda page. The executive summary of the Amberton FMP is
included at Attachment 2.
Detail
Emerge Associates, on behalf of Stockland has submitted the
Amberton Foreshore Management Plan (FMP) for Council’s approval, in
accordance with the requirements of LSP 82.
The proposed development has a coastal frontage of
approximately 700 metres. The FMP has been prepared to guide the planning,
development, rehabilitation and long term management of the Amberton foreshore
which is a local beach.
The area incorporates a Parks and Recreation reserve and
areas of Public Open Space (POS) allocated under LSP 82, to ensure that an
adequate foreshore reserve is provided in accordance with State Coastal
Planning Policy 2.6 (SPP 2.6).
The FMP contains information addressing the following:
· Environmental
characteristics of the management plan area;
· Coastal
management guidance relevant to the site;
· Proposed
foreshore development plans;
· Management
actions; and
· Implementation
roles and responsibilities.
Proposed development
Approval of this FMP relates only to the ‘Amberton
Foreshore area’, as delineated in red in the FMP concept master plan (Attachment
1). The WAPC approved the subdivision to the east of the foreshore in
October 2015. The FMP masterplan included as Attachment 1 reflects the
latest subdivision proposal. The closest existing residents to the Amberton
foreshore are approximately 1 kilometre to the east.
The FMP proposes the following structural elements within
the foreshore reserve; as illustrated in Attachment 1:
· One
coastal node, including:
- Pedestrian
and vehicle access;
- Car
park - approximately 35 bays;
- Children’s
playground;
- BBQs;
- Beach
shower;
- Bike
racks;
- Shelters;
and
- Cafe.
· 3
pedestrian beach access ways;
· 3
passive recreation areas;
· One
dual use path adjacent to the foreshore reserve running north/south for the
length of the development;
· One
emergency vehicle beach access way; and
· One
lookout.
Drainage
Within the foreshore reserve, drainage retention for 1 in
100 year storm events is proposed with no drainage entering the vegetated areas
of the foreshore reserve. Drainage retention for 1 in 10 year storm events will
occur outside of the foreshore reserve, in accordance with State Coastal
Planning Policy No. 2.6 (SPP 2.6).
Beach safety
Surf Life Saving Western Australia (SLSWA) has completed a
Coastal Aquatic Risk Assessment (CARA) to determine beach safety risks along
the Amberton coastline. The CARA provided a number of recommendations:
· SLSWA
recommended that the southern area of the foreshore is the most
“friendly” to a range of beach users based upon user competency and
user experience;
· Stockland
is to provide safety signage and general locational and information signage to
the satisfaction of SLSWA; and
· Stockland
is to develop an educational and awareness program in conjunction with City of
Wanneroo in order to mitigate risks at aquatic coastal locations.
SLSWA has also indicated that a lifesaving and surveillance
outpost could be accommodated at Amberton in the future, should visitation
rates exceed the predicted usage for this local beach.
Proposed Cafe
Stockland is proposing a relocatable cafe within close
proximity to the ocean. Details of the proposed cafe are set out below:
· The
relocatable cafe shown in the concept master plan in Attachment 3 is
proposed forward of the 30 year coastal processes line. This is in an elevated
position to capture views of the ocean and the coastline. It is estimated that
the asset will have a structural lifespan of between 30-40 years in a coastal
setting.
· Stockland’s
consultant MP Rogers has indicated that the current indicative location of the
cafe will not be impacted by coastal erosion for the first 10 years of its
lifespan. Beyond this timeframe there is a low risk of impact from coastal
erosion between 10 years and 20 years.
· Stockland
would place appropriate signage around the indicative site to acknowledge it is
a relocatable structure and temporary in nature (this is the same approach as
for Sprout in Alkimos).
· The
relocatable cafe will be designed in a way that would enable the building to be
relocated to avoid being impacted by coastal erosion.
· The
building would be constructed from lightweight materials that are durable in a
coastal setting. Examples of the potential design of the relocatable cafe, as
shown in the FMP, have been included in Attachment 4.
· Stockland
is prepared to provide a bond to the City to cover any potential relocation
cost for the cafe including removal of supporting infrastructure and
revegetation of the area. A potential relocation site has been identified in
the FMP and is illustrated in Figure 13 of the FMP (Attachment 5).
· A
development application is required for the cafe and all other foreshore
facilities and infrastructure. Stockland has indicated that they would accept a
time limited approval for the cafe.
· The
site will require re-contouring from the crest of the dune in an area of
degraded vegetation to construct the cafe.
· The
proposed relocatable cafe location was originally proposed by Stockland to be
Crown land within the foreshore reserve. However, during late October and early
November 2015, Stockland advised Administration that it intended to subdivide
the relevant land within the foreshore reserve for the relocatable cafe into
freehold land and transfer the lot to the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC). The proposed arrangement is similar to that developed
between PEET and the WAPC at Shorehaven. Administration understands that a reason
for this change is that the leasing of the site is achievable in the freehold
arrangement, whereas a Crown land, public recreation reserve, may not secure a
power to lease.
· In
the event that the relocatable cafe land is provided to the WAPC in freehold as
a separate lot, the WAPC would grant a land lease to Stockland to construct the
cafe buildings and then sublease the site to the cafe operator.
The leasing documents
would be prepared between the WAPC and Stockland, although the WAPC has
verbally advised Administration that it would seek input from the City and
would be prepared to accommodate the City’s key considerations, namely:
- The
requirement that the cafe is relocatable;
- Specifications
for the building construction materials; and
- An
acknowledgement that the land is to remain owned by the WAPC, and will not be
transferred to the State for City management until such time that the City
consents to assume management under a management order.
Car Park
A car park of approximately 35 bays is located behind the
prospective cafe sites and east of the 50 year coastal processes line. A car
park has a structural lifespan of an estimated 50 years which will enable the City
to make a decision as to whether the car park will be retained or reconstructed
in 50 years based on the physical impact of erosion and inundation. As
identified in the concept master plan, the road connecting to the car park will
be constructed to allow for on road car bays should a new car park location be
required beyond 50 years.
Condition of Management
Given the conceptual nature of some of the elements proposed
within the FMP, the following conditions have been included within the document
to ensure the City does not inherit an asset it cannot manage or maintain:
“Stockland
and the City of Wanneroo acknowledges that this FMP is conceptual and that the
detailed design of all prescribed assets and infrastructure will occur during
the development application stage. Stockland recognises that should the City of
Wanneroo determine that they do not have the capacity to maintain and manage a
proposed asset then the City reserves the right to require the application to
show this accordingly. The City and Stockland will work together in a
collaborative fashion to ensure that all assets are suitable to the resources
available to the City.
The proposed playground and all
other public amenities including but not limited to applications for play
equipment, exercise equipment, outdoor furniture, shelters, structures, BBQ's,
drinking fountains and public art will satisfy the following criteria:
1. Maintenance
thereof is to be within the City's operating budget;
2. Replacement
thereof is to be within the City's capital works budget;
3. Compliance
thereof with the Australian Standards and City's safety standards;
4. The
scale of the playground is to be appropriate to the size of park it is proposed
in; and
5. The
playground provides opportunity for physical and creative play and accommodates
for different age groups.”
Implementation Plan
The implementation schedule in
Table 10 of the FMP details issues and actions required to deliver the FMP,
along with their frequency and the responsible authority.
The implementation schedule does
not require the City to undertake any works. However, following a 5-year
maintenance period by the proponent, the City will accept handover of assets to
maintain and manage subject to the requirements of handover. This excludes the
relocatable cafe which, if required, will be relocated at the expense of
Stockland.
Consultation
Stockland has conducted extensive community consultation for
the Amberton FMP through monthly community meetings held since mid-2013.
Attendance at these meetings has included the following stakeholders:
· Local
residents;
· Amberton
Residents Association; and
· City
of Wanneroo staff and some local Elected Members.
Participants have provided valuable input towards the FMP
masterplan and the proposed assets. Given the consultation that has taken place
to date and the absence of residents adjacent to the foreshore, Administration
believes that further external consultation is not required.
Internally, Administration has reviewed prior drafts of the
FMP and requested a number of changes. These changes are now reflected in the
document presented for approval and Administration is supportive of the final
draft of the FMP subject to the conditions of approval in the recommendations
of this report and the cafe being relocated in the master plan to a location
between the 30 year and 50 year vulnerability line.
Comment
Under the State Coastal Planning Policy No. 2.6, a local
beach is defined as the following:
“Local beaches are those
that are used by people living close by and are often accessed by foot or
bicycle, as well as by car. Local beaches usually have very few facilities and
infrastructure, and generally record relatively low rates of use.”
Administration has worked in collaboration with the
Department of Planning and Stockland to ensure that the amenity and
infrastructure proposed within the Amberton foreshore corresponds with SPP 2.6.
Administration is also cognisant of the projected impact coastal erosion and
inundation may have on the Wanneroo coastline and specifically the assets
proposed within the Amberton foreshore. These projections are illustrated in Attachment
5.
Administration’s approach in discussions with
Stockland in the assessment of the FMP is that more expensive assets such as
car parks, cafes and children’s play areas should be located in areas
where they are not going to be potentially impacted by coastal erosion before
the end of the asset’s natural lifespan. For example, a car park
has an estimated lifespan of 50 years and therefore the car park has been
located behind the 50 year coastal processes setback line to allow for the full
lifespan of this asset. This reflects the approach Administration would
like to take in a local planning policy currently being prepared.
Stockland is proposing a relocatable cafe forward of the 30
year coastal processes line, in the land that Stockland will transfer in
freehold to the WAPC.
Whilst Administration is supportive of the provision of a
cafe within the Foreshore, it is Administration’s recommendation that any
long term cafe be located between the 30 year and 50 year coastal processes
lines for the following reasons:
· A
location between the 30 and 50 year coastal processes line will provide a more
long term and sustainable position for the cafe that would be less likely to be
impacted by coastal erosion before the end of its natural lifespan than the
current indicative location;
· Stockland
could still deliver a cafe between the 30 to 50 year coastal processes line
that would deliver ocean views, and a strong relationship with the foreshore
environment.
· The
proposed Stockland cafe location is located on top of a dune. To enable the
construction of the cafe on the top of the dune re-contouring will be required
within areas of degraded vegetation. Administration recommends that the cafe be
located as indicated on the map included at Attachment 3 and that the
degraded dune immediately to the west (Stockland’s preferred location) be
re-contoured, as would also be required with Stockland’s proposed
location. The area between Administrations preferred location and the dune
could then be graded to act as a grassed viewing area for the local community
which would be connected to the cafe. By removing the top of the degraded dune
it would also provide extensive ocean views, similar to those proposed by
Stockland’s location. The benefit of Administration’s
recommendation is that the cafe is located between the 30 year and 50 year
vulnerability lines but still contains ocean views and the provision of a low
cost grassed viewing area.
· Administration
is concerned that if the cafe were constructed in the current proposed
indicative location and it had to be relocated; there could be very strong
community expectation that it remain in situ. To an extent, this could be
managed through the lease between the WAPC and Stockland, but the City would
have limited input in this regard (such as in requesting that the WAPC ensure
that the lease term is sufficiently limited to reflect the City’s
preferred expiry date). There could be significant pressure placed on Council
to retain the asset in that location and to implement coastal protection works
as an alternative to relocation. It is therefore Administration’s
preference that these community expectations are not raised and that the cafe
initially is located in a position where it is not likely to be required to be
relocated before the end of the cafe’s structural lifespan. Given the
cafe structure is estimated to have a lifespan of 30-40 years, the cafe should be
located between the 30 year and 50 year coastal processes lines.
· Administration
would also like to avoid a situation of disturbing the quiet enjoyment and
business goodwill of the lessee if the cafe were to be relocated during the
lease term.
The comments in this report regarding the arrangements
between Stockland and the WAPC for the relocatable cafe site are provided
notwithstanding that it is Administration’s preference for the land
tenure for the leased site to be a Crown reserve managed by the City under a
management order and the premises construction and lease arrangements to be
documented in a deed of agreement to be negotiated between Stockland and the
City. This would enable the City to control the timeframe for the cafe’s
relocation should this be required in the future. However, Administration
understands that Stockland is entitled to subdivide the proposed land and
proceed with its planned arrangements with the WAPC.
The beach access path and emergency vehicle beach access are
considered mandatory for the usability of this location and therefore should be
retained as shown. The majority of vegetation within the foreshore reserve has
been identified as Very Good or Good and the FMP proposes
landform and vegetation retention for these areas.
One of the main focuses of the FMP is to promote
conservation and ecological features of the foreshore reserve by providing
community recreation opportunities in degraded areas of the foreshore. The
southern coastal node has been located in an existing degraded area and coastal
access paths have been proposed to align with existing tracks where possible to
minimise the disturbance to existing vegetation.
Statutory
Compliance
Approval of the FMP by Council is required to satisfy the
approval requirements of LSP 82. Once endorsed by Council, the Amberton FMP
will be forwarded to the WAPC for approval. All future development applications
for the Amberton foreshore will be assessed against the approved FMP.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment
- A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally
Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of
environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future
generations to enjoy”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Climate change
|
High
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Manager City Growth
|
Manage
|
In accordance with SPP 2.6, a sea level rise of 0.9 metres
is predicted by the year 2110. The risk to coastal infrastructure and assets as
a result of sea level rise is a key consideration of the Amberton FMP.
Acknowledging these risks, Administration has requested Stockland and Emerge
Associates in preparation of the FMP to locate assets in areas which should not
be impacted by coastal impacts prior to the conclusion of the asset’s
structural life span. Stockland has identified adaptation options for all proposed
assets and has identified relocation sites for the car park and relocatable
cafe in response to these risks.
The location of the relocatable cafe is a key risk
consideration for this foreshore development. Whilst Administration is
supportive of the provision of a relocatable cafe, it is considered that this
should be positioned between the 30 year and 50 year coastal processes line to
reduce the risk of impact from coastal erosion and storm events before the end
of the café’s structural lifespan.
Policy
Implications
Administration is in the process of preparing a Foreshore
Assets Policy to guide the preparation and assessment of Foreshore Management
Plans and in particular the location of assets within the Foreshore. It
is intended that this will be presented to a future Council Forum for Elected
Members consideration. The approval of the cafe in Administrations
proposed revised location is generally consistent with the approach
Administrations is including in the emerging draft policy.
Financial
Implications
In accordance with SPP 2.6 ‘the proponent is
responsible for the implementation of the FMP as well as funding, maintenance,
monitoring and management of the foreshore works for a period not less than 5
years, commencing from the completion of all foreshore works’. After
such time, following practical completion, the City will accept handover of the
foreshore reserve in accordance with the City’s maintenance standards and
approved detailed drawings.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the draft Amberton Foreshore Management Plan subject to the following
amendments:
(a) The
cafe is situated between the 30 year and 50 year coastal processes lines, with
the land tenure to be a Crown reserve managed by the City under a management
order and a lease with the operator, but that in the event that the cafe is
instead situated in land owned in freehold by the Western Australian Planning
Commission (WAPC) (as proposed by Stockland) the City advises the WAPC that:
i. In
the event that the cafe is situated in land subject to potential coastal
hazards before the 30 year coastal processes line, the lease term will be in
accordance with the City’s advice to the WAPC;
ii. The
building materials for the cafe are to be approved by the City; and
iii. The
formal consent of the City will be required before the City will accept any
management order for the land incorporating the cafe.
(b) The
turfed areas and asphalt walkways positioned west of the car park, with the
exception of the emergency vehicle access, single beach access way and a
grassed viewing area in front of the cafe, are relocated between the 30 year
and 50 year coastal processes line;
(c) The
identified relocation site for the cafe is to be shown on the FMP concept
master plan; and
(d) The
Amberton Foreshore Management Plan (FMP) is amended to reflect Council’s
resolution.
2. FORWARDS
a copy to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its approval.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Amberton FMP MASTER PLAN REV E.pdf
|
15/464597
|
|
|
2.
|
Amberton FMP Executive Summary
|
15/450870
|
|
|
3.
|
Amberton FMP Master Plan and Cafe locations
|
15/546664
|
|
|
4.
|
Amberton Relocatable Cafe designs
|
15/451262
|
|
|
5.
|
Amberton FMP Coastal Vulnerability Mapping
|
15/454890
|
|
PS12-12/15 Proposed
Pedestrian Accessway Closure - Pedestrian Accessway between Nott Place and
Oldham Park, Yanchep
File Ref: 22235
– 15/294510
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the permanent closure of a pedestrian accessway
(PAW) between Nott Place and Oldham Park, Yanchep.
Background
The PAW consists of a land parcel formally known as Lot 55
(10P) Nott Place, Yanchep.
The PAW land between Nott Place and Oldham Park was
dedicated in the early 1970's as part of the subdivision of the locality. The
PAW was intended to provide a pedestrian connection from the cul-de-sac of Nott
Place and Oldham Park.
A location plan that identifies the location of the PAW is
included as Attachment 1. Attachment 1 also includes a plan that
identifies the location of roads and features (such as Oldham Park, Yanchep
District High School and shopping centres) referred to in this Report, and the
submissions received by Administration.
The physical characteristics of the PAW are as follows:
· The
subject PAW is four metres wide and approximately 34 metres long.
· The
PAW land slopes gently upwards from Nott Place.
· The
PAW is vacant, and contains no footpath, fencing or other infrastructure. The
PAW land is indistinguishable from the adjoining properties on either side.
· The
PAW land contains dense vegetation comprising of:
o Overhang from non-native
agonis flexuosa (peppermint trees), planted on the adjoining Lot 332
(11) Nott Place;
o Various low-lying
non-native weed species; and
o Native shrub species olearia
axillaris and scaevola crassifolia, situated predominantly on the
eastern portion of the PAW where it adjoins the Oldham Park reservation.
Yanchep residents had previously enjoyed access from Nott
Place to Oldham Park via an unsealed track that existed on the southern portion
of a vacant Lot 334 (10) Nott Place, a residential lot adjoining the PAW.
Residents lost the pedestrian access through Lot 334 in late 2014, as the
unsealed track was removed to commence construction of a dwelling on that lot.
The density of the vegetation in the PAW had previously made
it inaccessible for pedestrians. In late October 2015, and in response to
requests made by local residents seeking to obtain access through the PAW,
Administration arranged for the pruning of the overhang from the peppermint
trees and the removal of weed shrub species. Pedestrian access through the PAW
is still impeded by the native low-lying shrubs that Administration was
required to retain, as removal of native vegetation requires a Clearing Permit
pursuant to Section 51E of the Environment Protection Act 1986.
When advertising the proposed PAW closure; not only did
Administration receive a strong response objecting to the PAW closure, but also
a strong response for the City to provide pedestrian access through the PAW.
This report considers whether the PAW should be closed; and should the PAW not
close, what measures the City can undertake in maintaining a pedestrian access
between Nott Place and Oldham Park (within the PAW).
Lodgement of a Petition
A petition tabled by Cr. Winton with 144 signatures was
tabled at the 18 August 2015 Council Meeting (PT02-08/15); requesting Council
formally considers objecting to the permanent closure of the land designated as
a pedestrian accessway between Nott Place and Oldham Park, Yanchep.
This Report responds to the request raised in the petition,
and recommends that Council not support the PAW closure. Administration intends
to respond to the principal petitioner following Council’s resolution on
the matter.
Detail
A request was received on 3 June 2015 by the landowners
(hereafter referred to as the applicants) of Lot 334 (10) Nott Place, Yanchep
to close the PAW. In their submission to Administration on 3 June 2015, the
applicants requested the City consider closing the PAW, for the following
reasons:
· Preservation of the existing vegetation located on the PAW;
· Reduce potential traffic issues through Nott Place;
· Maintain the beautiful and tranquil nature of the immediate
area; and.
· Maintain levels of privacy.
The applicants have expressed an intention to acquire the
PAW land, and to meet costs associated with that acquisition. The applicants
have also expressed their disappointment to Administration that the peppermint
trees in the PAW have recently been pruned.
Consultation
In accordance with the Land
Administration Act 1997, Administration arranged the publication of a
notice in the Wanneroo Times and North Coast Times on 14 July 2015 and Sun City
News on 16 July 2015, inviting comment during the advertising period concluding
on 20 August 2015.
Public consultation was also carried out by way of:
· Letters
to landowners of land in proximity to the subject PAW. A map demonstrating the
extent of the letter distribution is included as Attachment 2;
· Installation
of signage at the Nott Place cul-de-sac head adjoining the PAW; and
· Letters
to relevant government agencies and service authorities that may be affected by
the closure of the PAW.
During the consultation period, Administration received 26
submissions. Of those submissions, 22 objected to the PAW closure, and four
submissions raised no objection to the proposed closure of the PAW. A summary
of the submissions received, together with Administration's comments to each is
included as Attachment 3.
Comment
The City's Local Planning Policy for Pedestrian Access Ways
(the Policy) provides guidance to evaluate PAW closure requests. Further
assessment of the PAW closure request against the policy provisions is provided
for below:
Role of the PAW within the Neighbourhood
Administration considers the PAW to be a 'Single Access
Route PAW'. A Single Access Route PAW is defined in the Policy where a PAW does
not form part of a continuous access route. A continuous access route is where
more than one PAW forms part of an access route.
The PAW could enable the easterly pedestrian movement from
Lefroy Road, down Nott Place and into the PAW to connect to Oldham Park. As
outlined through the submissions, this route seems popular with residents
accessing facilities such as Oldham Park, the Yanchep District High School and
the shopping centres located adjacent to Marmion Avenue.
Residents walking in a westerly direction from Oldham Park
could use the PAW to access Nott Place; and from there the beach via Lefroy
Road and Kaiber Avenue.
Access to Community Facilities and Services
The Policy stipulates that where a PAW is considered to
provide an important access route to community facilities and services, closure
shall generally not be supported.
The PAW could provide residents with pedestrian access to
existing community facilities and services, such as:
· For
eastbound pedestrian movement – Oldham Park, Yanchep District High
School, as well as the shopping and medical facilities situated on Marmion
Avenue; and
· For
westbound pedestrian movement – the beaches and foreshore along Brazier
Road (in particular the Yanchep Lagoon).
A plan that demonstrates the location of the PAW in relation
to the facilities mentioned above is included as Attachment 1.
Anti-Social Behaviour Considerations Related to the PAW
The Policy stipulates that Council should consider the role
that the PAW may serve in facilitating anti-social behaviour, including
graffiti, burglary and dumping of litter. Neither the landowners adjoining the
PAW or the submitters have stated that the PAW attracts anti-social behaviour.
Access for the Disabled and Seniors
The Policy stipulates that a PAW
access is especially relevant where a PAW provides pedestrian access from
senior’s accommodation/aged person’s homes. As there are no seniors
accommodation/aged persons homes located in close proximity to the PAW, this
matter is not relevant.
Availability of Alternative Access Routes
The Policy states that PAW closure shall only be supported
if alternative viable access routes are available. Viable alternative access
routes should be safe, convenient and not substantially longer than a route
through an existing PAW.
Although pedestrian routes along Chrisp Place or Kaiber
Avenue provide access to these facilities, the comments received through the
submission suggest an alternative route to these facilities via the PAW would
provide a popular alternative. Removing the possibility of access through the
subject PAW will result in longer pedestrian routes to local facilities,
particularly for residents of Nott Place, Arney Place and parts of Lefroy Road.
Alternatives to the Closure of the PAW
Should Council not support the PAW closure as recommended,
the City (as the authority that has care of the PAW) could ensure that the PAW
can be used for its intended purpose of providing pedestrian access. To ensure
that pedestrian access can be provided between Nott Place and Oldham Park, the
City could consider the following:
· Clearing
existing shrubs on the PAW land, to provide unsealed access between Nott Place
and Oldham Park. As outlined in the ‘Background’ section above, the
clearing of native plant species would require a Clearing Permit under Section
51E of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. To obtain a Clearing
Permit, Administration could arrange for the application to be prepared and
lodged to the Department of Environment Regulation (DER). The DER would then
have a statutory timeframe of 90 days to consider whether it grants (or refuses
to grant) the Clearing Permit;
· Ensuring
that foliage from the peppermint trees overhanging from the adjoining Lot 332
is regularly maintained;
· Whether
the provision of permanent pedestrian infrastructure in the PAW (such as a
footpath) is feasible. At Council’s request, Administration could
undertake investigations into the feasibility of permanent pedestrian
infrastructure in the PAW, and report back to Council at a later date (e.g. by
June 2016). The investigations would form a conclusion whether the construction
of pedestrian infrastructure in the PAW should be included in the City’s
10 year Capital Works Program. Administration anticipates that the estimated
cost in constructing a footpath in the PAW (and additional connecting footpaths
through the western extent Oldham Park as shown on the plan included as Attachment
4) would be approximately $80,000; and
· Ensuring
that pedestrian access (whether that access is sealed or not) can be provided
through the PAW in a manner that is deemed safe by Administration.
Conclusion
In light of the above points, Administration does not
support the closure of the PAW.
As outlined in the ‘Background’ section of the
Report, the Yanchep residents had previously been enjoying informal access
between Nott Place and Oldham Park via an unsealed track that was situated on a
(then) vacant lot (Lot 334 Nott Place), situated adjoining the densely
vegetated and inaccessible PAW. As construction of a dwelling on Lot 334
commenced in late 2014, and as the PAW remained densely vegetated, access from
Nott Place to Oldham Park was inhibited; which, as expressed through the
submissions, was at the detriment of existing Yanchep residents.
The landowner of Lot 334 has sought to acquire the PAW land,
as the dense vegetation within the PAW provided a benefit for their amenity. On
reviewing the PAW closure request, Administration is of the view that:
· The
dense vegetation providing the amenity for the landowner of Lot 334 is situated
on a land parcel (the PAW) that is intended to provide pedestrian access; and
· The
use of the PAW land for pedestrian access is sought and favoured by the
community generally (as expressed through the submissions summarised in Attachment
3).
Administration recommends that unsealed pedestrian access be
facilitated through the PAW in the short term, provided that such access can be
provided in a manner that is deemed safe by Administration. It is then
recommended that Council requests Administration investigate the feasibility
and cost in providing permanent, sealed pedestrian infrastructure in the PAW
(and in adjoining portions of Oldham Park, as demonstrated in Attachment 4),
and report findings of those investigations back to Council by June 2016.
Statutory
Compliance
If considering whether to close a PAW, the City must comply
with Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997 and Regulation 9 of
the Land Administration Regulations 1998, dealing with public
advertising, objections and service agency responses to the proposed PAW
closure.
The Department of Lands has advised that, where a local
authority makes a request under Section 58 of the Land Administration Act
1997, the local authority must indemnify the Minister for Lands in respect
of that closure.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working
With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City
works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic
or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relates to
the issues contained in this report.
Policy
Implications
The request to close the PAW has been considered in
reference to the City's Local Planning Policy for Pedestrian Access Ways and
the Department of Planning publication 'Procedure for the Closure of
Pedestrian Access Ways – Planning Guidance' (the Procedure).
The Procedure outlines the consultation process that should
be followed when considering a request to close a PAW. With consideration of
the consultation methods prescribed in the Procedure, Administration considered
the use of an advertisement in local newspapers, a direct mail out to
potentially affected households and signage at the Nott Place end of the
accessway as appropriate forms of consultation in this instance.
Financial Implications
Should Council resolve not to close the PAW, financial
implications would then depend on the costs of clearing and maintaining the PAW
land, as well as the costs of providing a footpath and other infrastructure if
considered necessary.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES
the petition tabled at the 18 August 2015 Council Meeting requesting Council
consider objecting to the closure of the pedestrian accessway between Nott
Place and Oldham Park, Yanchep (PT02-08/15), and ADVISES the principal
petitioner of this decision;
2. NOTES
the submissions received as summarised in Attachment 3 in respect to the
proposed closure of the pedestrian accessway formally known as Lot 55 (10P)
Nott Place, Yanchep, and ENDORSES Administration's responses to those
submissions;
3. DOES
NOT SUPPORT the closure of the pedestrian accessway formally known as Lot 55
(10P) Nott Place, Yanchep; where identified on the plan included as Attachment
1;
4. REQUESTS
that Administration clear the vegetation in the pedestrian accessway formally
known as Lot 55 (10P) Nott Place, Yanchep to the extent required to facilitate
pedestrian access, and to obtain the required Clearing Permits from the
Department of Environment Regulation pursuant to Section 51E of the Environmental
Protection Act 1986 prior to any clearing;
5. REQUESTS
Administration investigate the feasibility and costs in providing permanent,
sealed pedestrian infrastructure at the following locations, and report the
findings of those investigations to Council by June 2016:
a) In
the pedestrian accessway formally known as Lot 55 (10P) Nott Place, Yanchep;
and
b) In
the western portion of Oldham Park, where generally indicated on the plan
included as Attachment 4; and
6. ADVISES
the adjoining landowners, Department of Lands, Department of Planning, and the
submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Location Plans - Proposed PAW Closure
- 10P Nott Place, Yanchep
|
15/533814
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Location Plan Showing Extent of Letter
Distribution - Consultation of PAW Closure
|
15/533802
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Summary of Submissions - Proposed PAW
Closure - Nott Place, Yanchep
|
15/554621
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Concept Plan of Possible Footpath
Location
|
15/531335
|
Minuted
|
PS13-12/15 Approval
of Expenditure from the Sustainability Investment Fund Reserve
File Ref: 6903
– 15/523263
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider approval of expenditure from the Sustainability
Investment Fund (SIF), in accordance with the SIF Expenditure and Reporting
Policy.
Background
Council at its Meeting on 18 August 2015 approved expenditure
of $82,888 (ex.GST) for:
1. Next
Energy to install additional solar panels at Aquamotion, Kingsway Indoor
Stadium and Clarkson Library and an energy monitoring system at
Aquamotion; and
2. Power
Intelligence to install a Voltage Optimisation system at Aquamotion
(PS03-08/15).
The value of the solar panel component totalled $51,492
(ex.GST).
The aim of these works was to maximise the number of panels
that could be installed on each facility and involved installing additional
solar panels as follows:-
· Aquamotion –
20 additional solar panels;
· Clarkson Library
– 46 additional solar panels; and
· Kingsway Indoor
Stadium – 46 additional panels
Subsequent to Council’s consideration of this matter
at its August 2015 meeting, Administration were advised by Next Energy that the
Clean Energy Council (the peak body for the clean energy industry in Australia,
including solar panel providers) had changed the rules on claiming Small
Technology Certificates (STCs) and that this has an unavoidable impact on the
price of the additional solar panels proposed to be installed.
Detail
When an organisation purchases and installs a solar panel
system, it is entitled to create and claim STCs (formally called Renewable
Energy Certificates). Organisations are eligible to receive 1 STC for
every Megawatt hour of energy the system is expected to produce over the next
15 years. STCs can be sold (either to the Clean Energy Regulator or on
the private STC market) to recoup a portion of the cost of purchasing and installing
the system, and it is therefore common practice for the purchaser to allocate
the STCs to the system installer in exchange for a discount on the purchase
price of the system. For example if 31 STCs equates to $1,500 then an
organisation would receive a $1,500 discount on the system purchased.
All new solar panel installations now require an inverter
that complies with a new standard, IEC 62109 - Earth Fault Alarms.
An earth fault alarm is a new safety requirement designed to
detect if there is a fault or short-circuit between the circuits of the solar
panel system and the ground (earth). Since the introduction of the new
standard, only compliant inverters (those with an earth fault alarm) are able
to claim STCs.
Although the inverters on the City’s existing solar
panel systems at the Civic Centre, Clarkson Library, Kingsway Indoor Stadium
and Aquamotion do not have earth fault alarms installed, there is no
requirement for them to be retrofitted as a result of the new standard.
Should an earth fault occur, the inverter will automatically stop working and
Next Power will notify the City of the fault within 12 hours.
However, it does mean that the additional solar panels
proposed to be added to the systems at Clarkson Library, Kingsway Indoor Stadium
and Aquamotion are unable to claim STCs to offset their cost and as a result
Next Power has increased the price of their quotation to undertake this work.
Given the above, Administration has identified the following
options in order to progress the installation on solar panels on these
facilities:
· Option 1 –
Proceed as originally planned using the existing inverters
If this option were preferred,
the City would be unable to claim STCs to offset the cost of the new panels,
and an additional $15,976 would apply to the project to what was previously
authorised by Council in August 2015.
The total cost of this option
would be $67,468 ex GST (an increase of $15,976 from what was previously
endorsed by Council).
· Option 2 –
Replace the inverters at Aquamotion, Clarkson Library and Kingsway Indoor
Stadium
In order to claim STCs on the
additional solar panels the City would need to replace the existing inverters
at each facility to comply with the new standard. For Clarkson Library
and Kingsway Indoor Stadium the value of the STCs applicable would offset the
cost of replacing the inverters ($9,000) due to the large number of panels
proposed to be installed. For Aquamotion, as there are a lessor number of
panels able to be installed, the value of the STCs applicable would not fully
offset the cost of a new inverter. Should the City wish to replace this
inverter an additional cost of $4,000 would apply.
Furthermore, as the STCs would be
used to subsidise the new inverters and not the additional solar panels, an
additional $15,976 would apply, as outlined in option 1.
The total cost of this option
would be $71,468 ex GST (an increase of $19,976 from what was previously
endorsed by Council).
· Option 3 –
Replace inverters at Clarkson Library and Kingsway Indoor Stadium only
An alternative option would be
for the City to only replace the inverters where it is financially beneficial
to do so (i.e. at Clarkson Library and Kingsway Indoor Stadium) and retain the
existing inverters where it would attract an additional cost (i.e. at
Aquamotion). This would result in upgraded inverters at two of the
facilities fully offset by the STC rebate and additional solar panels on all
three facilities for the same additional cost as if the City did not replace
the inverters (as outlined in Option 1).
The total cost of this option would be $67,468 ex GST (an
increase of $15,976 from what was previously endorsed by Council).
This is the recommended option.
Comment
The change to the eligibility for claiming STCs on new solar
panel installations is beyond the City’s control and was not allowed for
in quotations obtained from suppliers in the lead up to Council previously
considering this matter in August 2015. As a result, the unbudgeted
expenditure out of the SIF Reserve account approved by Council at that meeting
is not sufficient to cover the revised cost of the project.
Regardless of the option chosen to progress this project,
the City will incur additional costs to what was previously approved by Council
in August 2015. Option 3 is considered to present the best value for
money for the City as it will result in new inverters being installed at two of
the sites at no additional cost to what would have been incurred under Option
1. This is also the preferred option as there are equipment efficiency
and solar output benefits to be gained from upgrading the older inverter
equipment to newer models. The existing inverter units are still in good
working order and could then be retained as spares and re-used in the event of
a fault with any of the other units outside of warranty.
It is not proposed to upgrade the inverters at Aquamotion at
this point in time as there is no financial incentive to do so, there have been
no issues with their operation to date and they remain under warranty for
another 5 years. If at some point in the future they require replacement,
then the City can consider this at that time when necessary.
In order for Administration to continue to progress the
installation of additional solar panels and new inverters as outlined in
preferred option 3 above, it is necessary for Council to consider approving
additional unbudgeted expenditure from the SIF to cover the additional cost
resulting from this policy change.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 6.8 (1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires
unbudgeted expenditure to be approved by an Absolute Majority of Council.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment
- A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally
Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of
environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future
generations to enjoy”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Workplace health and safety
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Coordinator Safety Systems
|
Manage
|
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this
report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate
Risk Register.
Policy
Implications
The City’s Accounting
Policy Section 3(g)(c) states that where the budget allocation for a capital
work project is insufficient, in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Local
Government Act 1995 there is a requirement for a recommendation to the Council
seeking authorisation of the necessary budget variation.
Financial
Implications
The table below outlines the financial implications of each
of the options considered.
|
OPTION
|
ORIGINAL COST
(ex GST)
|
ADDITIONAL COST
(ex. GST)
|
TOTAL
|
|
Option 1:
· Retain current
inverters
· Proceed with
previously approved solar panel additions at all three sites,
· Accepting the
STC cost increase affecting all 3 buildings (Aquamotion, Clarkson and
Kingsway)
|
$51,492
|
$15,976
|
$67,468
|
|
Option 2:
· Replace
inverters at all 3 buildings (Aquamotion, Clarkson and Kingsway) to comply
with new earth fault alarm standard
· Proceed with the
previously approved solar panel additions at all three sites
|
n/a
|
$19,976
|
$71,468
|
|
Option 3:
· Replace
inverters at Clarkson and Kingsway to comply with new earth fault standard
· Retain existing
inverters at Aquamotion
· Proceed with previously
approved solar panel additions at all three sites
|
n/a
|
$15,976
|
$67,468
|
The cost of the solar panel expansion project under the
preferred Option 3 would increase by $15,976 (from $51,492 ex. GST to $67,468
ex. GST).
There is currently $120,732 available in the SIF which is
sufficient to fund the revised cost for the solar panels ($67,468) and the
Voltage Optimisation system being installed at Aquamotion ($31,396).
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. Pursuant
to Section 6.8 (1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE
MAJORITY the over expenditure of $15,976 excluding GST, to be funded
from the Sustainability Investment Fund Reserve; and
2. NOTES
the amended scope of the solar panel project to:
a)
replace the inverters at Clarkson Library and Kingsway Indoor Stadium to comply
with the new standard IEC 62109 – Earth Fault Alarms;
b) install
additional solar panels at Aquamotion, Clarkson Library and Kingsway Indoor
Stadium; and
c) install
an energy monitoring device at Aquamotion.
Attachments: Nil
Assets
Asset Management
IN01-12/15 City
of Wanneroo Roadwise Working Group - Amendment to Terms of Reference
File Ref: 1446V03
– 15/541438
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider amending the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the
RoadWise Working Group (the Working Group).
Background
The City’s RoadWise
Working Committee was formed in 2003. At the Council Meeting of
23 September 2008, Council endorsed a revised TOR to consider the proposed
conversion of the Roadwise Advisory Committee to a working group, and the amendment
of the relevant Terms of Reference.
The Roadwise Working
Group’s role is to provide a forum for community liaison, implement
community road safety projects of a strategic nature. The TOR has been reviewed
to include cycling as a key item and define suitable criteria for the
appointment of community representatives to the Group.
Detail
Amendments to the Terms of Reference are summarised below
and shown in Attachment 1.
Amended Role/Purpose
The Working Group’s role/purpose is to provide a forum
for community liaison, implement community road safety projects and to provide
strategic advice to the City of Wanneroo on strategic traffic and road safety
issues aligned with the City of Wanneroo Road Safety Strategic Action Plan
2015-2018 that affects the residents and transport users within the City.
Aims and Function
Following items have been included, deleted or amended:
1.2 Include
– to contribute to the development of the City’s Cycle Plan;
1.6. Delete
– reducing trip travel speeds; and
Add
wording – or under the influence of alcohol and drugs.
Membership
It is proposed to:
· Increase the number of community representatives from
four to five;
· Include the following criteria for the appointment of
community representatives:
1. Reside
or have a business within the City of Wanneroo that has a strong road safety
involvement;
2. Represent
a specific road user group, such as cyclists, emergency services, walking clubs
or vehicle clubs;
3. Represent
a specific section of the community such as seniors, disabled, schools,
community service organisation;
4. Have
a demonstrated interest/experience in general road safety strategies;
5. Have
a positive attitude to road safety issues;
· Include a new clause authorising the Director Assets
to appoint or remove of the Group members, other than the Elected Members
appointed by Council.
3.4.1 Administration Support
Administration Support of the Working Group will be
provided by the City of Wanneroo.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The purpose of the TOR is proposed to be amended to reflect
the Working Groups Strategic Action Plan (SAP) which provides direction to the Working Group in addressing local road safety
issues and implementing projects of a strategic nature and requires
review annually.
The
increase in the number of community representatives will allow the inclusion of
a range of community views, experience and knowledge to be presented and
considered by the Group.
The inclusion of criteria to select community
representatives will provide further enhance the selection process.
Other changes are considered to also assist in administering
the working of this Group.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 5.15 and 5.19 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe
Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the amended Terms of
Reference for the City of Wanneroo Roadwise Working Group as shown in
Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Amended Terms of Reference - Nov 2015
|
15/557832
|
Minuted
|
Infrastructure Maintenance
IN02-12/15 Dewars
Beach Access Track - Progress Report
File Ref: 1695
– 15/106973
Responsible
Officer: Manager
Governance and Legal
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 7
Issue
To consider the status of Dewars Beach Access Track (Track).
Background
Council at its meeting on 11 November 2014 considered a
report (IN07-11/14 Dewars Beach Access Track – Progress Report) and
resolved to:
“1. NOTES
that the Dewars Beach Access Track was re-opened on 17 April 2014;
2. NOTES
that the easement documents in relation to the existing Track have been amended
to effect the variation of the public access easement;
3. RECEIVES
the “Dewars Beach Access – Concept Design Report” prepared by
engineering consultant, Lycopodium;
4. NOTES
that an ‘off road 5 year strategy community working group’ has been
established to develop a 5 year strategy for off-road users;
5. NOTES
that the investigation of parking prohibitions on Dame Pattie Drive of motor
vehicles other than those owned by residents will be undertaken by
Administration during November with a report scheduled for the December meeting
of Council;
6. NOTES
that negotiations are progressing with the landowners to determine a possible
realignment of the Track through their land;
7. DOES
not make a decision on the possible upgrade of the existing Track until the
outcome of Item 6 above is known, an ‘agreement in principle’ is
obtained from the landowners on the Track Options as explained in this report
and a legal opinion is provided to Council regarding the risk implications of
not proceeding with any of the Track upgrade options;
8. SEEKS
a further report when the items outlined in 4, 6 and 7 are resolved.”
A report was presented to the
Council Forum meeting on 7 July 2015 providing an update on the matters and
possible outcomes specifically regarding items 4, 6 and 7:
· off
road 5 year strategy community working group established to develop a 5 year
strategy for off-road users;
· negotiations
with the landowners to determine a possible realignment of the Track through
their land; and
· possible
upgrade of the existing Track, an ‘agreement in principle’ from the
landowners on the Track options and a legal opinion regarding the risk
implications of not proceeding with any of the Track upgrade options.
Council requested further
information in relation to the risks and liability exposure for the City in
respect of the Track, usage of the Track and facilitating usage beyond the
Track. Accordingly in August 2015, the City appointed LGIS Risk Management
to facilitate a risk workshop to identify key areas of uncertainty, risk and
opportunities related to the Track and its impact on the City. The
workshop was held on 23 October 2015 with a number of staff and was facilitated
through LGIS Risk Management to identify key areas of uncertainty, risk and
opportunities related to the Track and its impact on the City. A copy of
the Risk Workshop Report is attached as Attachment 1.
Detail
4WD Off Road Working Group
The 4WD Off Road Working Group (Working
Group) was established and held its first meeting on 2 October 2014.
The Working Group was intended to be made up of key members of off road
clubs/groups and organisations and was formed to provide the off road community
a platform to voice their opinions for future off-road recreation. One of
the key functions of the Working Group was to provide a 5 year strategy to the
City which would outline a sustainable and responsible off road use/plan for
the off road driving community. At this stage, there have been no alternative
routes suggested or identified by the Working Group regarding changes to the
Track.
To the best knowledge of the City,
the Working Group only met on four occassions, and the City has not adopted an
off road strategy. The City does provide an “Off Road
Vehicles” brochure which contains a list of permitted locations for this
activity. There was also an undertaking that 4WD clubs and groups would
assist with educating the users on safe usage of the Track. However
despite their efforts, non-compliant, illegal and destructive use has
continued.
Upgrade Options
As the Track traverses across two
private land holdings, it is currently governed by two easements (Easements).
The Easements provide for an area that is nominally a 10m wide corridor from
Damepattie Drive through Lot 13 on DP39563 to its boundary, being a distance of
approximately 2km, and is nominally 20m wide from that point through Lot 14 on
DP 39563 to the informal parking area at the end of the Track.
The “Dewars Beach Access
– concept Design Report” produced by Lycopodium (Report) was
received by Council at its Ordinary Meeting held on 11 November 2014. The
Report identified three options for works to be carried out to improve the
existing Track and reducing the risk to the City due to the current condition
of the Track. A summary of the three options is provided as Attachment
2.
Design Option 1 involves widening of the existing Track,
expanding the airing down area and reducing the crests and length of curves in
an attempt to make the Track safer at an estimated cost of $800,000.
Option 1 (Attachment 3 refers) was considered the best option for
implementation. Lycopodium has also produced a Deposited Plan which can be
lodged at Landgate based on the requirements to allow construction of design in
accordance with Option 1. The same Deposited Plan could also be used for
design Option 3. Should design Option 2 be considered, a revised
Deposited Plan would be required.
The private landowners have indicated ‘in
principle’ agreement for the Option 1 concept designs prepared by
Lycopodium.
Should it be determined to upgrade the Track, it is proposed
that the detailed plan of design Option 1 be prepared by Lycopodium in the
coming months. The detailed plan would also include all the statuary
compliance issues identified below and will take a number of months to
arrange.
Once the detailed design is provided, Council could then
consider a future report based on tender prices before considering allocating
funds to this project. Construction works on the Track are more suited to
Autumn/Winter when the Track is less widely used and the weather conditions are
more favourable for works to be carried out. Therefore the earliest the
works could be carried out is June 2016 subject to Council endorsement and
obtaining external approvals as noted later in the report.
Easements
The Easements required updating
following the Council meeting of 11 November 2014, to ensure the landowners for
each portion of the Easement area and the City were appropriately equipped to
respond to risk and liability issues. Following prolonged negotiations,
an 'in principle' agreement has been reached with both landowners based on
Option 1 of the Concept Design Report produced by Lycopodium. It contains
the following key clauses:
· a
public access easement is granted, providing access to pedestrians and assorted
vehicles from Damepattie Drive to a carpark on the Reserve that the City holds
under Management Order, which facilitates access to the beach;
· a
maximum term of ten years, noting that the parties have equal rights to apply
for a surrender of the easement at any time;
· the
relevant landowner is not to interfere with the public access to the Track;
· the
City is able to close the Track for any period it deems appropriate, should the
need arise;
· the
City is responsible for all maintenance and repair of the Track; and
· the
City will indemnify the relevant landowner against any claim in respect of
loss, damage, death or injury to property or a person arising either directly
or indirectly from the use of the Track.
An easement deed does not have the power to govern issues
beyond the easement area, that is, it cannot deal with the illegal activity
which occurs when users of the Track depart from the easement area. In
fact, the Easements, and the proposed replacement easements prohibit the City
from erecting any structure (other than signs) in the car park area at the end
of the Track which may prevent users from departing from the Easement area, unless
the landowner agrees. The boundaries of the Easement area are currently
identified on maps displayed along the Track, and evident from fencing and
other warning signs both at the start and end of the Track.
As noted above, the current Easements and the principally
agreed easements have a surrender clause which can be activated by either party
at any time during the term. In the event that one or both of the
landowners terminate the easements, the City would cease to have any
responsibility for the Easement Track across the private land, with the
landowners becoming responsible for closing the Track (or maintaining the Track
if access continued). It is important to note that the City is similarly
empowered to do so, even if the landowners wanted the Easements to
continue.
Ongoing Maintenance Vandalism and Compliance
Ongoing maintenance measures will
also be required should the Track remain open. The current maintenance costs
are in the order of $50,000 per annum. Maintenance works undertaken on the
Track includes a number of activities including grading, fence repairs,
managing erosion issues and sign repairs (Attachment 4 refers).
It is expected that similar
maintenance costs will still be required each year whether the Track is
upgraded or not and these costs will be consistent irrespective of any decision
to restrict operational hours for the Track. There is a risk of increased
costs arising depending on potential vandalism of any method used to restrict
access within set time frames. The restricted timeframes would not reduce
the City’s overall risk responsibilities.
The City’s Ranger team conducted an extensive
monitoring program of Track users between 26 and 28 September 2015 (inclusive).
A total of 562 vehicles entered the Track from Damepattie Drive. From their
surveillance and patrols, the Rangers identified that approximately 90% of
these vehicles were intending to use the Track to (illegally) facilitate a
journey north beyond the end of the Tack.
It is known that non-compliant behaviour occurs at the Track
(Attachment 5 refers). To mitigate the City’s risk exposure and
ensure a level of compliance, Rangers services have been expanded to provide a
presence at the Track. However, to ensure sustained compliance, Rangers
presence is required on an ongoing basis for extended periods. The costs
associated with Rangers providing a presence at the Track have now been
calculated and set out in the table below:
|
Number of Rangers
|
Hours Present at Track
|
Costs Per Annum
|
|
Rangers x 2
|
4 hours per day
|
$140,000
|
|
Rangers x 2
|
10 hours per day
|
$314,000
|
Notwithstanding that the presence of Rangers helps reduce
known risks on the Track, should Track users leave the Track to carry out
illegal activities, they are outside of the Rangers jurisdiction. Rangers
would not be able to follow and pursue those users that leave the Track to
carry out enforcement activities, and the level of risk exposure remains
extreme. Should a decision be made to close the Track, Rangers presence would
likely still be required although the need would be much reduced and their responsibility
would only extend to issues affecting the land outside of the Track maintained
by the City.
Adjoining Residents’ Complaints
The City has received a number of
complaints from the residents of Dame Pattie Drive and Sovereign Drive
regarding the antisocial activities which occur at the entrance to the Track
adjoining their properties. (Attachment 5 refers). The complaints relate
to the Track users stopping/parking on the streets blocking the driveways,
using air compressors, loud music, litter and other matters both during the day
and night.
Between 1 November 2014 and 1 November 2015 the City:
· received
65 customer requests relating to Track issues; and
· issued
12 parking infringements.
Risk Workshop
The Risk Workshop was held on 23
October 2015 with a number of staff and facilitated by the LGIS Risk Management
Team. The LGIS Risk Management Team conducted the Risk Workshop in
accordance with the principles and process as prescribed in ISO 31000.2009 and
as part of the process the risks identified were aligned with the City’s
Strategic Community Plan objectives. The risks were assessed using the
City’s adopted Risk Management Methodology and captured in the risk
register as detailed in Attachment 6.
The key findings from the Risk Workshop identified a total
of 15 risks that are summarised below:
|
Risk ID
|
Risk Title
|
Management Systems Effectiveness
|
Overall Risk
|
Action Options Identified
|
|
DBAT-01
|
Vehicles Impact Environment
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-02
|
Unauthorised Tracks and Access
|
Satisfactory
|
Moderate
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-03
|
Littering and Illegal Dumping
|
Satisfactory
|
High
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-04
|
Unsafe Track
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-05
|
Erosion and Deterioration
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-06
|
Uncontrolled Use
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-07
|
Unexploded Ordnance
|
Satisfactory
|
High
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-08
|
Active Lifestyle Impact
|
Newly Introduced
|
High
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-09
|
Local Business Impact
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Low
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-10
|
Short Return on Investment
|
Some Weaknesses
|
High
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-11
|
Competing Community Expectations
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-12
|
Unsustainable Resource Allocation
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-13
|
Easement Unequitable Allocation of Risk
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-14
|
Eroded Liability Protection
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
|
DBAT-15
|
Lack of Strategy
|
Some Weaknesses
|
Extreme
|
Y
|
The risk assessment identified 9 risks with an overall
rating of extreme, 4 risks were rated as high, 1 risk was rated as moderate and
1 risk was rated as low.
It is important to note that in accordance with the risk
rating table (set out in Attachment 1), the overall risk ratings
attributed to the 15 identified risks have been determined as follows:
· for
the overall risks identified as Extreme, the consequence parameters have
predominately been due to a major event which with prioritised and focused
management will be endured with the likelihood of such occurring being either
likely or almost certain to occur;
· for
the overall risks identified as High, the consequence parameters have
been either a significant event that which can be managed under special
circumstances or a major event which with prioritised and focused management
will be endured with the likelihood of such occurring being either likely or unlikely;
and
· for
the overall risk identified as Low, the consequence parameters is that
it could be managed through normal activity with a moderate likelihood of
occurring.
Risk mitigation strategies were
also identified during the Risk Workshop and are summarised below:
· increase compliance activities, maintenance measures and
capital expenditure;
· surrender Easements and close Track;
· for any future Track changes, manage reputational exposures
and community reaction;
· proactively address known reputational exposures;
· consider restricting operational hours of Track;
· decision required on Track usage and associated operational
costs;
· terminate or renegotiate Easements;
· enhance legal position on reasonableness of control
measures;
· community consultation; and
· establish an off road strategy.
The Risk Workshop confirmed that the existing control rating
and level of risk will remain unchanged if nothing is done to address those
unacceptable risks.
Consultation
Should the City decide to surrender the Easements,
discussions would be undertaken with the landowners and a timeframe of revoking
the Easements would need to be established.
The landowners have been consulted in respect of negotiating
the easements, however it is proposed that the City engages with the landowners
to seek their comments should the upgrade option be endorsed regarding the
proposed modifications to the Track.
Should an upgrade option be
endorsed, it is proposed to:
· undertake
community consultation with the residents adjoining the Track entrance;
· commence
the detailed design of the upgrade option; and
· liaise
with the 4wd off road working group and encourage them to consider determining
alternate alignment in the long term when the Track ceases to exist due to the
proposed development by the landowners;
· present
a report to Council at the conclusion of the community consultation and
detailed design.
Comment
The City has considered legal advice from both external
counsel (Item SIN01-04/14 refers) and the City’s lawyer in respect of any
potential liability issues arising out of the condition of the Track and
further legal advice was provided to the Elected Members under a separate
‘confidential cover’.
Following consideration of the abovementioned legal advice,
and substantial internal dialogue, Administration considers that there are two
options available in respect of the Track:
1. Keep
the Track Open
Given the duty of care
the City owes to users of the Track, and the various indemnity provisions under
the Easements and principally agreed easements, the Track would need to be
upgraded as outlined above if the Track was to remain open.
Similarly, given the
consistent evidence of misuse of the Track, the City would need to increase its
maintenance and monitoring program, and its regulatory compliance program.
Risks arising from the
illegal use of the Track and its surrounds will remain under this option, and
resident concerns will not be addressed.
An additional risk is
that the term provision negotiated in the principally agreed easements allows
for the landowners to apply to surrender the easement at any time
notwithstanding that the City will have undertaken an extensive and expensive
upgrade of the Track.
The total cost
associated with upgrading the Track and providing ongoing maintenance and a
level of compliance for 10 years is in the range of $2.75m to $4.49m, as
further detailed in the Financial Implications section of this report.
2. Close
the Track and Surrender Easements
The information obtained
from Rangers patrols confirms that the majority of Track users are not
accessing it for its intended purpose and confirms that vehicles are using the
Track as a thoroughfare. This causes significant damage to the environment,
including (inter alia) erosion, and poses great threat to the safety of all
users of the Track. Closure of the Track will remove the City’s liability
in respect of its use. Similarly, the City will no longer be seen to be
facilitating something which it knows is being used and which provides for
illegal and anti-social behaviour.
As the Track does
provide community benefit to those few who are using its for its proper
purpose, the City would be required to implement a manageable timeframe and
plan for the closure, which would include managing community reaction.
Similarly, in
acknowledging that illegal use may continue beyond the closure of the Track,
the City will undertake relevant patrols, and implement signage regimes to
assist in informing the community of the closure, and work with the landowners
and adjoining local authorities to minimise community impact.
Although some reduction in the risk can be achieved through
the options outlined above with regard to upgrading the Track and ongoing
maintenance and compliance activities, the ongoing risk issues regarding Track
vandalism and misuse are not in keeping with the City’s Strategic
Community Plan 2013-2023.
“2 Society
– Healthy, safe vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe
Communities – We feel safe at home and in our local area”.
It is therefore considered that the option to close the
Track and surrender the Easements appears to be the only effective means to
manage safety risks and avoid exposure and ongoing liability risks to the City.
Subject to Council’s decision on closing the Track, a
detailed compliance and communications plan (refer to Attachment 7) will
be implemented to ensure that relevant stakeholders are advised. The compliance
and communication plan includes the following:
· Information
dissemination actions including:
a)
Signage;
a.
Notifications to Landowners, Residents, relevant government agencies,
Local Businesses & Schools in the area;
b)
Updating City’s website and social media;
c)
Frequently Asked Questions;
· Outlining
compliance actions including Ranger patrols and support that can be provided to
the Landowners;
· Engaging
with local police; and
· Working
with Shire of Gingin and Department of Parks and Wildlife in respect of
authorised 4WD tracks located in the locality of Gingin.
Further information will also be made available through the
Frequently Asked Questions information sheets that have been prepared to
provide information directly to members of the public who are seeking
information in respect of the Track, closure of the Track, accessing Dewars
Beach and alternative 4WD tracks in the locality of Gingin.
Administration initially proposed closure of the Track on 11
December 2015. However, to enable the effective implementation of the
compliance and communication plan actions, it is recommended that Track closure
be implemented from 18 December 2015; and increase the frequency of safety
inspections and Ranger patrols to identify and mitigate urgent safety matters
until the Track is closed permanently. This will also enable the additional
Ranger patrols to be fully operational and with targeted focus on the Track and
Dewars Beach. It is reasonable in such circumstances that the City plan
appropriately to ensure that the City is fully prepared to dedicate the required
resourcing to deliver the compliance and communications plan.
Statutory
Compliance
In the event that Council decides to implement an upgrade
option for the Track, four applicable approvals were identified that will
require further investigation during the detailed design stage:
· Clearing
Permit
· Heritage
Survey
· UXO
Clearances
· Development
Approval
Regardless of whether the Track is a thoroughfare for the
purposes of the Local Government Act 1995 (Act), the City is not
considered a 'manager' of the Track under the easements, and therefore section
3.50 of the Act (relating to the notification of thoroughfare closure) is not
applicable. Despite this, the City will undertake various public notification
programs, including:
· Installation
of signage at or near the track entrance;
· A
letter drop to local residents; and
· Information
posted on the City’s website.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
2.3 Safe
Communities – We feel safe at home and in our local area
Risk
Management Considerations
Risks associated with the choice of the upgrade options have
been addressed earlier in the Lycopodium report.
Risks associated with the current state of the Track are
being mitigated with ongoing inspections and maintenance works to ensure the
safety of the Track users. However, further consideration is required to
mitigate the risks identified and detailed earlier in this report. Long term
management will be exceptionally costly to the City given the proportion of the
community which properly utilises the Track.
In accordance with the City's adopted Risk Appetite
Statement, the City will not undertake any activity which may involve or result
in serious injury in the public realm arising from the City's negligence.
Council must give due consideration to the Risk Appetite Statement and the risk
of serious injury to Track users due to the current state of the Track.
In facilitating access to and use of the Track, the City has a duty of care to
all Track users to do all things reasonable to ensure that the Track is safe to
use for its intended purpose. If this cannot be achieved, then in
accordance with the City's Risk Appetite Statement, the City must not
facilitate access to or use of the Track.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
· Upgrade
Costs (Capital) – Based on the preliminary design and cost
estimates provided by Lycopodium, the Track Upgrade and airing down area works
are likely to cost in the order of $800,000. The exact financial implications
will be confirmed as part of the detailed design and will be subject to
Council’s consideration and decision as part of the report on the outcome
of the community consultation and the detailed design of an upgrade option.
· Maintenance
Costs (Operating) – Maintenance costs are estimated to in
the order of $50,000 per annum, which may increase subject to the impact of any
increased potential vandalism or non-compliant Track use.
· Compliance
Costs (Operating) – The costs associated with the ongoing
compliance regime in respect of the Track are estimated to be in the range of
$140,000 to $314,000 per annum.
The total cost associated with upgrading the Track and
providing ongoing maintenance and a level of compliance for 10 years is in the
range of $2.75m to $4.49m.
Only $50,000 has been allocated in PR-3052 Upgrade Dewars
Track, Two Rocks for preparing the design and documentation for the upgrade
option. No funding provisions have been made in the Long Term Capital Works
Program to facilitate the construction works associated with the Track upgrade;
and in operating budgets for the ongoing maintenance and compliance costs.
Should the upgrade option be chosen, there will be a need to
allocate $800,000 in the Long Term Capital Works Program and a total of $1.9m
to $3.64m in the next 10 years’ Operating Budgets
The costs associated with withdrawing from the Easements and
closing the Track would be in the vicinity of $50,000, subject to consultation
with the adjoining landowners regarding reinstatement and compliance
requirements. The costs required to close the Track could be sourced by a
re-allocation of funds from Project Number PR-3052 Upgrade Dewars Track, Two
Rocks, listed in the approved 2015/16 Capital Works Program.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the permanent closure of the Dewars Beach Access Track from 18 December 2015;
2. NOTES
that signage will be installed at and around the Dewars Beach Access Track to
advise of the closure on 9 December 2015;
3. NOTES
that Administration will liaise with the Shire of Gingin to install signage to
the north of the Dewars Beach Access Track advising potential users of its
closure;
4. NOTES
that Administration will liaise with the respective landowners over the closure
of the Dewars Beach Access Track;
5. NOTES
that a compliance and communications plan (as set out in Attachment 7) will be implemented
to ensure compliance and inform relevant stakeholders;
6. NOTES
that increased Rangers patrols will be carried out to focus on non-compliant
behaviour in and around the Dewars Beach Access Track to assist the respective
landowners in managing compliance issues; and
7. AUTHORISES
the Chief Executive Officer to apply to surrender the easements over the Dewars
Beach Access Track.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
LGIS Report
|
15/537301
|
|
|
2.
|
Upgrade Options
|
15/544672
|
|
|
3.
|
Draft Easement requirements Dewars Track
|
15/142428
|
|
|
4.
|
Dewars Track Maintenance Activities
|
15/561665
|
|
|
5.
|
Dewars Track vandalism and anti social behaviour
|
15/561704
|
|
|
6.
|
LGIS Risk Register as at 23 October 2015
|
15/545257
|
|
|
7.
|
Compliance & Communication Plan
|
15/573942
|
Minuted
|
Infrastructure Projects
IN03-12/15 Wanneroo
Civic Centre Extension and Refurbishment
File Ref: 19008
– 15/556410
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider advertising for public tender the Wanneroo Civic
Centre Extension in early 2016.
Background
At its meeting of 26 May 2015,
Council resolved (Item IN02-05/15 refers) to:
“ENDORSE the revised
Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Concept Plan, City of Wanneroo Drawing No
2836-1-1, and as detailed in Attachment 1, noting that:
1. the
plan is to be constructed with two storey office building with ability for an
additional floor to be added in future; and
2. the
environmental and energy ratings applied to the design will align with State
Government standard “4.5 Star” NABERS, but aiming for at a "5
Star" NABERS energy rating and for a “5 Star” (version 2)
Green Star Office Design ratings.”
Detail
The Bollig Design Group (BDG)
incorporated the resolutions arising from Council report item IN02-05/15 into
the design of the revised Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension (WCC Extension)
concept plans.
An independent consultancy firm
will peer review the design principles, including meeting the environmental and
energy ratings, as endorsed by Council and implemented by BDG. Noting
compliance with the stipulated environmental and energy ratings can only be
verified when a physical audit is undertaken after a year’s total occupation
of the constructed extension.
There have been no significant
changes to the BDG concept plans as previously presented to Council, other than
those modifications that address the environmental and energy ratings and
offices and amenity internal layouts, designed to satisfy the requirements of
the spatial planning staff accommodation.
The July appointment by the
Chief Executive Officer of a Spatial Design consultant, MKDC, has advanced the
spatial design planning for work points within the existing Wanneroo Civic
Centre and Extension building.
The principles proposed for the
spatial planning take into account the current and future accommodation
requirements that are envisaged with the growth of the City of Wanneroo; and
involved visiting specific successful working examples of activity based
working and open planning, and workshopping the design principles with the
City’s executive to confirm that what was proposed would align with the
City’s new operational management structure.
It is proposed that the
documentation for the construction of the WCC Extension and refurbishment of
the Civic Centre be completed and tendered simultaneously as two separate
tenders. The advantage of this course of action is that all aspects of
the construction and fitout works are known; a prime contractor can build the
extension and the work can be coordinated with the fitout contractor to
complete the internal works in the extension and the existing Civic
Centre.
This will avoid the reworking
cost and time delays normal to a lessee fitout of a vacant tenancy, and with
the use of a specialist consultant’s definitive program, within each
tender documentation, the order and timing for the construction and fitout
works will be determined to suit the City’s Administration.
The design principles endorsed
by Council, on 26 May 2015, have been incorporated into the design
documentation, and the cost estimate for the construction of the WCC Extension
and refurbishment has been prepared.
A Chief Executive Officer signed
application was submitted, in July 2015, to the local authority seeking its Approval
to Commence Development for the construction of the WCC Extension.
The City advised adjoining property owners in regards to the proposed
development and erected a roadside notice board on the corner of Servite and
Cafaggio Terrace, seeking public comment by the end of 21 August 2015.
City Administration duly processed the application; granting approval to
commence the development subject only to the City’s general conditions.
Consultation
Extensive consultation was undertaken with the primary
stakeholders during finalisation of the design of the WCC Extension. The
same consultation is being finalised with the primary stakeholders in the
settlement of the spatial design for the existing and extension building,
paying particular attention, by the Spatial Planner, to the layout for
workpoints and office amenities within each building so that the coordination
of the implementation of the internal fitouts can be timed for a staged staff relocation
during the construction of the WCC Extension and refurbishment of the Civic
Centre.
Consultation external to the City of Wanneroo administration
was undertaken in relation to the construction of the WCC Extension but not in
regards to the scope of internal works and fitout.
Comment
The quantity surveyor has
provided detailed cost estimates totalling $24M for the construction of the WCC
Extension and refurbishment of the Civic Centre.
Administration’s
recommendation is to accept the benefits that the current minimal building cost
escalation and tender the proposed works as soon as possible.
Works Program
The tentative works program
based on Council’s acceptance to proceed with tendering the WCC Extension
building works indicates that tenders can be called during January/February
2016 after finalisation of design and documentation of the WCC Extension and
refurbishment of the Civic Centre. Time required to undertake the tendering
process and construction works is estimated to be 22 months. It is therefore
recommended that the City proceeds to the construction tender stage of this
project
Statutory
Compliance
The proposal aligns with the following objectives within the
Strategic Community Plan
2013 – 2023:
4 Civil
Leadership – Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
strong and Progressive Organisation – You will recognise the hard work
and professionalism delivered by your Council through your interactions and how
our community is developing.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working
With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City
works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic
or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relates to
the issues contained in this report.
Project risks will be identified
and addressed as part of the construction management and programming phase of
the WCC Extension and refurbishment of the Civic Centre.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
A total project budget of $27M
is listed for the WCC Extension project (PR-2332) in the current draft long
term Capital Works Program. The cost provisions that have been initiated
by a reduction in the scope of works for the construction of the WCC extension
have been offset by an increase in scope of works for the refurbishment of the
existing Civic Centre where the building is brought in line with the provisions
being made within the fitout of the WCC Extension.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES advertising by public tender
the construction of the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension, at 23 Dundebar Road
Wanneroo.
Attachments: Nil
Tenders
IN04-12/15 Tender
No 01545 - Supply and Application of Pesticides in Turf for a Period of 36
months
File Ref: 23342
– 15/510771
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01545 for the Supply and Application
of Pesticides in Turf for a period of 36 months commencing 9 December 2015 to 8
December 2018.
Background
Pesticide application services on all the City of
Wanneroo’s active and passive parks have previously been provided under a
period quotation. Due to the expected increase in the value of the required
service into the future it is now prudent to move to a public tender process to
ensure that the City is compliant with the Local Government Act 1995 and
Regulations.
Detail
Tender No. 01545 for the Supply and Application of
Pesticides in Turf was advertised on 22 August 2015 and closed on 8 September
2015.
Essential details of the proposed
contract are outlined below:
|
Contract
Type
|
Schedule
of rates
|
|
Contract
Duration
|
36
months
|
|
Commencement
Date
|
9
December 2015
|
|
Expiry
Date
|
8
December 2018
|
Tender submissions were received
from the following contractors:
· Sanpoint
Pty Ltd T/A LD Total;
· Turfcare
WA Pty Ltd;
· Turfmaster
Pty Ltd; and
· The
Trustee for B&S Tanasoski Family Trust & the Trustee for G&S
Blazeski Family Trust T/A Tiger Pest & Weed Control.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising of the City’s
Coordinator Parks Maintenance North, Coordinator Parks Maintenance South,
Principal Technical Advisor and with oversight and guidance from the Contracts
Officer, has evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following
selection criteria:
|
Selection
Criteria
|
Weighting
|
|
Price for the services
offered
|
40%
|
|
Demonstrated
relevant experience
|
20%
|
|
Demonstrated resources
and capability
|
20%
|
|
Demonstrated compliance
with OH&S requirements (safety management)
|
20%
|
Price for the services offered (40%)
This criterion was based on the
estimated cost to the City over the term of the contract based on rates
submitted by the tenderers in the price schedule and has resulted in the
tenderers being ranked as follows:
|
Tenderer
|
Estimated Cost
for 36 months
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$410,745
|
1
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
$426,790
|
2
|
|
LD Total
|
$593,775
|
3
|
|
Tiger Pest & Weed
Control
|
$712,450
|
4
|
Demonstrated relevant experience in
similar works with achievement of client expectations (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the tenderers'
experience in supplying services of a similar nature and circumstances.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd and Turfcare WA
Pty Ltd demonstrated extensive experience in the application of pesticides in
turf. Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided details of relevant contracts and clients
including the City of Wanneroo, City of Perth and the City of Stirling. Turfcare
WA Pty Ltd gave examples of the Cities of Wanneroo, Swan and Bayswater.
LD Total demonstrated some experience
associated with the application of pesticides in turf for local government,
being in the City of Kwinana and the City of Wanneroo.
Tiger Pest & Weed Control demonstrated
minimal experience associated with pesticide application in turf. Tiger Pest
& Weed Control’s experience was mainly with Main Roads WA and focused
on hardstand areas.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being
ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
LD Total
|
3
|
|
Tiger Pest & Weed
Control
|
4
|
Demonstrated allocation of sufficient resources and
capability to undertake the services (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the tenderers
staff, resources, plant and equipment and a sound methodology to deliver the
services required by the City.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd demonstrated having significant modern
resources, a sound methodology and provided detailed staff information and a
detailed plant and equipment list. LD Total and Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided
adequate information on their methodology, detailed information on staff, and
had a detailed list of available plant and equipment.
Tiger Pest & Weed Control provided documentation on
their availability of resources and capacity; however the methodology on
chemical application was not considered to be suitable to service this
contract.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being
ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
LD Total
|
2
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Tiger Pest & Weed
Control
|
4
|
Demonstrated compliance with OH&S requirements
(safety management) (20%)
The evaluation of safety management was based on the
tenderers’ submitted occupational health and safety (OHS) policy
documentation, working documentation, and responses to the OHS Management
System Questionnaire. Evidence of completed examples of incident reports, near misses
and hazard inspections were asked to be provided.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd and LD Total
provided detailed submissions. They provided comprehensive policies,
procedural documentation and demonstrated the use of working documentation
including comprehensive risk assessments, incident reports, hazard reports,
induction checklists, training records and toolbox records.
Tiger Pest & Weed Control
provided an adequate submission; however, had some omissions such as no actual
working documents.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided a detailed submission on safety
management; however, because of a recent safety compliance breach by Turfmaster
at the City’s Marangaroo Golf Course, Turfmaster was awarded a lower
score.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being
ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
LD Total
|
1
|
|
Tiger Pest & Weed
Control
|
3
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
4
|
Overall weighted
score
The
tenderer’s submissions were reviewed in accordance with the selection
criteria with the key aspect of the tender evaluation being price.
The
overall weighted score has resulted in the following tender ranking:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
LD Total
|
3
|
|
Tiger Pest & Weed
Control
|
4
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was assessed
as having the necessary experience, resources, operational capacity and safety
management systems to fulfil the requirements of the contract.
The key characteristics of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s
tender are:
· Relevant
experience with similar pesticide spraying operations including being a current
service provider with the City of Wanneroo; and
· Qualified key
personnel and modern equipment to enable the services to be rendered
successfully.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The evaluation undertaken by the Tender Evaluation Panel
resulted in the tender submission from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd achieving the
highest score in accordance with the selection criteria and weighting and
therefore Turfcare WA Pty Ltd is the recommended tenderer.
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section
3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
Operational
Risk
The condition of the City’s
parks and reserves can deteriorate quickly if not maintained to an acceptable
level. The inability of a contractor to supply these services will result the
degradation of the City’s assets and the City not providing the required
standard of service to its residents. It is important that the successful
tenderer has the required experience, staff, equipment, safety systems and
operational capacity to meet the contract requirements.
Financial Risk
An independent financial assessment
of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was undertaken by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd as part of
the tender evaluation process. The financial assessment raised a concern about
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s ability to meet the minimum desired financial
criteria for this contract.
The actual financial risk to the
City is assessed to be low because this contract is based on a schedule of
rates for services only supplied upon request by the City, with the services
paid for after satisfactory completion.
There may be some reputational risk
to the City if Turfcare WA Pty Ltd fails to deliver any services as requested,
although this is considered unlikely to occur, as the City has obtained
references from other local governments advising that Turfcare is providing
them with good, reliable service. The City has also recently received
satisfactory services from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd.
In addition, Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
has agreed to provide a bank guarantee to the value of $4,500 to mitigate
financial risks to the City.
Although Corporate Scorecard Pty
Ltd has raised a concern, in view of the further risk assessment and mitigation
measures, it is not considered of enough significance to change the recommended
tenderer for a contract of this nature.
Policy
Implications
Tenders were invited in
accordance with the requirements of the City’s Purchasing Policy.
Financial
Implications
The costs associated with the
supply and application of pesticides in turf is included in the annual Parks
Maintenance Operational Budget.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Turfcare WA
Pty Ltd for Tender No. 01545 for the Supply and Application of Pesticides in
Turf for a period of 36 months from 9 December 2015 to 8 December 2018 as per
the schedule of rates in the tender submission.
Attachments: Nil
IN05-12/15 Tender
No 01546 - Provision of Turf Renovation Services of Active Sportsfields and
Public Open Spaces for a Period of 36 Months
File Ref: 23344
– 15/510857
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01546 for the Provision of Turf
Renovation Services of Active Sportsfields and Public Open Spaces for a period
of 36 months commencing 9 December 2015 to 8 December 2018.
Background
Turf renovation services on the City’s active and
passive parks have previously been provided under a period quotation. Due to
the expected increase in the value of the required service into the future, it
is now prudent to move to a public tender process to ensure that the City is in
compliance with the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations.
Detail
Tender No. 01546 for the Provision of Turf Renovation
Services of Active Sportsfields and Public Open Spaces was advertised on 22
August 2015 and closed on 8 September 2015.
Essential details of the proposed
contract are outlined below;
|
Contract Type
|
Schedule
of rates
|
|
Contract Duration
|
36
months
|
|
Commencement Date
|
9
December 2015
|
|
Expiry Date
|
8
December 2018
|
Tender submissions were received
from the following contractors:
· Lovegrove
Turf Services;
· Turfcare
WA Pty Ltd;
· Turfmaster
Pty Ltd; and
· Parker
Family Trust T/A D & E Parker Lawn Service and Lawn Doctor.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the City’s
Coordinator Parks Maintenance North, Coordinator Parks Maintenance South,
Principal Technical Advisor and with oversight and guidance from the Contracts
Officer, has evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following
selection criteria:
|
Selection
Criteria
|
Weighting
|
|
Price for the services
offered
|
40%
|
|
Demonstrated
relevant experience
|
20%
|
|
Demonstrated resources
and capability
|
20%
|
|
Demonstrated compliance
with OH&S requirements (safety management)
|
20%
|
Price for the services offered (40%)
This criterion was based on the
estimated cost to the City over the term of the contract based on the rates
submitted by the tenderers in the price schedule and has resulted in the
tenderers being ranked as follows:
|
Tenderer
|
Estimated
Contract Cost for 36 Months
|
Ranking
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
$436,180
|
1
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$496,500
|
2
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
$542,100
|
3
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
$772,596
|
4
|
Demonstrated relevant experience in
similar works with achievement of client expectations (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the
tenderers’ experience in supplying services of a similar nature and
circumstances.
Lawn Doctor demonstrated extensive experience associated
with turf renovation in the local government sector by giving examples of the
City of Canning, City of Melville and Town of Mosman Park.
Lovegrove Turf Services and Turfcare WA Pty Ltd both had more
than adequate experience associated with the turf renovation services. Lovegrove
Turf Services gave examples of work competed at the Cities of Canning, Cockburn
and Wanneroo. Turfcare WA gave examples at the Cities of Wanneroo, Swan and
Fremantle.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd also demonstrated experience associated
with turf renovations for local government; however, Turfmaster’s
submission did not provide enough detail about the previous services provided
to ensure the stated experience was entirely relevant to this contract.
Turfmaster provided examples of the City of Stirling, the City of Wanneroo and
the City of Gosnells.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being
ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
2
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
4
|
Demonstrated allocation of sufficient resources and
capability to undertake the services (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the
tenderers’ staff, resources, plant and equipment and a sound methodology
to deliver the services required by the City.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd demonstrated
having significant modern resources, a sound methodology and provided detailed
staff information and a detailed plant and equipment list.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd and Lawn Doctor provided adequate
information on their methodology, detailed information on staff, and had a
detailed list of available plant and equipment.
Lovegrove Turf Services provided documentation on the
availability of resources and capacity; along with details of staff, plant and
equipment; however, detailed information on proposed methodology to deliver the
services was not provided.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being
ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
2
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
4
|
Demonstrated compliance with OH&S requirements
(safety management) (20%)
The evaluation of safety management was based on the
tenderers’ submitted occupational health and safety (OHS) policy
documentation, working documentation, and responses to the tender OHS
Management System Questionnaire. Evidence of completed examples of incident
reports, near misses and hazard inspections were also requested.
All tenderers adequately answered the questionnaire.
They provided comprehensive policies, procedural documentation and demonstrated
the use of working documentation including comprehensive risk assessments, incident
reports, hazard reports, induction checklists, training records and toolbox
records.
All respondents were found to have acceptable administration
systems in place in relation to OHS risk and quality management which satisfied
the criterion.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided a detailed submission on safety
management; however, because of a recent safety compliance breach by Turfmaster
at the City’s Marangaroo Golf Course, Turfmaster was awarded a lower
score.
The information provided
has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
1
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
1
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
4
|
Overall
weighted score
The tenderers’ submissions were reviewed in
accordance with the selection criteria with the key aspect of the tender
evaluation being price.
The overall weighted score has resulted in the following
tender ranking:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
2
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services
|
4
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was assessed
as having the necessary experience, resources, operational capacity and safety
management systems to fulfil the requirements of the contract.
The key characteristics
of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s tender are:
· Relevant
experience with similar turf renovation operations including being a current
service provider with the City; and
· Qualified
key personnel and modern equipment to enable the services to be rendered
successfully.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The evaluation undertaken by the Tender Evaluation Panel
resulted in the tender submission from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd achieving the
highest score in accordance with the selection criteria and weighting and
therefore Turfcare WA Pty Ltd is the recommended tenderer.
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section
3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
Operational
Risk
The condition of the City’s
parks and reserves can deteriorate quickly if not maintained to an acceptable
level. The inability of a contractor to supply these services will result the
degradation of the City’s assets and the City not providing the required
standard of service to its residents. It is important that the successful
tenderer has the required experience, staff, equipment, safety systems and operational
capacity to meet the contract requirements.
Financial Risk
An independent financial assessment
of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was undertaken by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd as part of
the tender evaluation process. The financial assessment raised a concern about
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s ability to meet the minimum desired financial
criteria for this contract.
The actual financial risk to the
City is assessed to be low because this contract is based on a schedule of
rates for services only supplied upon request by the City, with the services
paid for after satisfactory completion.
There may be some reputational risk
to the City if Turfcare WA Pty Ltd fails to deliver any services as requested,
although this is considered unlikely to occur, as the City has obtained
references from other local governments advising that Turfcare is providing
them with good, reliable service. The City has also recently received
satisfactory services from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd.
In addition, Turfcare WA Pty Ltd
has agreed to provide a bank guarantee to the value of $4,500 to mitigate
financial risks to the City.
Although Corporate Scorecard Pty
Ltd has raised a concern, in view of the further risk assessment and mitigation
measures, it is not considered of enough significance to change the recommended
tenderer for a contract of this nature.
Policy
Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of
the City’s Purchasing Policy.
Financial
Implications
The costs associated with the provision
of turf renovation services of active sportsfields and public open spaces are
included in the annual Parks Maintenance Operational Budget.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Turfcare WA
Pty Ltd for Tender No. 01546 for the Provision of Turf Renovation Services of
Active Sportsfields and Public Open Spaces for a period of 36 months from 9
December 2015 to 8 December 2018, as per the schedule of rates in the tender
submission.
Attachments: Nil
IN06-12/15 Tender
No. 01550 - Park Asset Renewal
File Ref: 22571
– 15/546145
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01550 for the City’s Park Asset
Renewal.
Background
The City’s Park Asset Renewal is an annual program of
works for the replacement of park assets (playgrounds, fitness equipment,
furniture etc.) which have reached the end of their useful asset life and
require replacement. The asset renewal program is a ‘like for like’
replacement program focusing on replacing ‘old’ with
‘new’.
The City’s asset renewal requirements have been
categorised into schedules based on the asset type, and are as follows:
1. Schedule 1A
– Playground renewal,
2. Schedule 1B
– Fitness equipment renewal; and
3. Schedule 1C
– Park furniture renewal.
Historically the City has sought park asset renewal on an
individual park basis under a WALGA request for quote arrangement; however this
has proven to be an inefficient business practice. In the interest of
increasing efficiency and streamlining the City’s asset renewal
practices, a tender for the implementation of a consolidated annual program of
works has been developed.
This tender included park assets at the following locations:
|
Park Name,
Suburb
|
Asset Type
|
|
Leemans Landing, Two
Rocks
|
Playground
|
|
Wanneroo Showgrounds,
Wanneroo
|
Playground
|
|
Mist Park, Banksia
Grove
|
Playground
|
|
Blackmore Park,
Girrawheen
|
Playground
|
|
Hainsworth Park,
Girrawheen
|
Playground,
Furniture
|
|
Homestead Park,
Clarkson
|
Playground
|
|
Monaghan Park, Darch
|
Playground
|
|
Paloma Park, Marangaroo
|
Playground,
Furniture
|
|
Mindarie Surf Life
Saving Club, Mindarie
|
Furniture
|
|
Cherokee Park, Clarkson
|
Fitness Equipment
|
Detail
Tender No. 01550 was advertised on Saturday 12 September
2015 and closed on Tuesday 13 October 2015.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type
|
Lump Sum Price -
Separable Portions
|
|
Tender Award
|
December 2015
|
|
Date for Practical
Completion
|
30 April 2016
|
As a separable portion contract, park asset renewal works
are arranged into individual schedules on a per park basis, with prospective
tenderers able to tender on all or selected schedules of work.
To ensure asset designs meet the City’s requirements,
the specification prescribed specific asset requirements and nominated a
predetermined budget price for the supply and installation of the required
asset. This predetermined budget price has been formulated based on asset
modelling of the replacement cost of the City’s existing park
asset.
Additionally tenderers were required to provide and price
for two different asset design options per schedule.
Tenders received.
Tender submissions were received from the following:
· Proludic
Pty Ltd (“Proludic”)
· Beefmaster
Steel Fabrications T/A Playmaster Pty Ltd (“Playmaster”)
· Moduplay
Group Pty Ltd (“Moduplay”)
· Miracle
Recreation Equipment (“Miracle”)
· Hansen
Pty Ltd T/A Forpark Australia (“Forpark”)
The Tender Evaluation Team (TET), consisting of two City
Project Officers Parks and Conservation, Landscape Designer and the Coordinator
Community Facilities Planning with oversight and guidance from the City’s
Contracts Officer, evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the
following selection criteria:
|
Description
|
Weighting
|
|
Price for the services
offered
|
10%
|
|
Ability to complete the
works within the nominated timeframe
|
15%
|
|
Demonstrated experience
|
25%
|
|
Park Asset submission
meets specification’s requirements, and offers high asset variety
|
30%
|
|
Occupational Health and
Safety
|
20%
|
Price of services offered (10%)
Pricing is assessed on a schedule basis per Park against a
pre-determined budget price. A number of submission contained options which
were deemed non-conforming (“NC”) in not meeting the specified
budget price. Not all tenderers provided pricing against both options presented
for each Park.
Tendered pricing and ranking for each Park is provided as
per Schedules 1A, 1B and 1C, refer Attachment 1.
Ability to complete the
works within the nominated timeframe (15%)
Assessment of this evaluation criterion considered the
tenderers’ resources listed for use in carrying out the services, level
of current commitments and associated manufacturing and installation lead
times.
Forpark stated a lead time from order placement to
installation on site was approximately 8 weeks which complied with the City
required timeframes; additionally they possess three fulltime installation
teams.
Miracle stated lead time for locally produced products was
nine weeks from order and 20 weeks for imported products. Miracle only listed
one subcontractor and had four current commitments.
Moduplay and Proludic are interstate companies. Moduplay
listed only one Western Australia subcontractor for installation works and had
an extensive list of current commitments. Proludic stated lead time at 12-14
weeks and relied on numerous subcontractors for various works.
Playmaster stated lead time of approximately 6-8 weeks,
however provided no indication of start or completion dates. They provided a
list of their current commitments.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being
ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Forpark
|
1
|
|
Miracle
|
2
|
|
Proludic
|
3
|
|
Moduplay
|
3
|
|
Playmaster
|
5
|
Demonstrated Experience (25%)
Assessment of this evaluation criterion considered the
tenderers' experience in undertaking works of a similar nature and
circumstances.
Forpark provided an extensive list of their previous
experience which included work with a large number of local councils, private
landscape contractors and schools on projects of varying size and monetary
budget.
Playmaster provided good examples to support their
demonstrated experience and included written references from previous clients.
Miracle and Proludic provided good examples of previous
experience however their experience was not shown to be as extensive.
Moduplay provided examples of previous experience but these
were not for work undertaken in within Western Australia.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being
ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Forpark
|
1
|
|
Playmaster
|
2
|
|
Miracle
|
3
|
|
Proludic
|
3
|
|
Moduplay
|
5
|
Park Asset submission meets specification’s
requirements and offers high asset variety (30%)
The asset options for each Park were assessed in respect to
the following:
· How
each design met the specification requirements; and
· The
variety of play offered by each design.
Designs which conflict with the specific requirements as set
out in the Specification where deemed non-compliant NC and Tenders which did
not submit a design for specific schedules were assessed accordingly.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being ranked as per
Schedules 1A, 1B and 1C, refer Attachment 2.
Occupational health and
safety management (20%)
The assessment for safety management was based on the
tenderers response to the OHS questionnaire provided within the Request for
Tender document.
Moduplay provided a comprehensive submission, which included
their OSH policy, project management plan, details of their last audit,
extensive list of Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS), and completed examples of
incident report forms.
Forpark, Miracle and Proludic all provided submissions
detailing their OSH management. Forpark only provided auditing and Safe Work
Method Statements in respect to their factory operations. Miracle did not
provide details of previous OHS audit and did not provide completed examples of
incident forms. Proludic did not include completed examples of incident
reports.
Playmaster did not include details of their previous OHS
audit, training records or safety induction procedure.
Based on the information provided, tenders have been ranked
as below under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Moduplay
|
1
|
|
Forpark
|
2
|
|
Miracle
|
2
|
|
Proludic
|
2
|
|
Playmaster
|
5
|
Overall Weighted Score
In accordance with the overall weighted evaluation criteria,
tenderers have been ranked on a separable portion basis. For an overall ranking
breakdown for Schedules 1A, 1B and 1C, refer Attachment 3. Tender
documents and analysis are available in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Playgrounds play an important role in child development,
providing environments that stimulate the development of social skills,
imagination and creativity, problem solving skills and key motor skills
(Kidsafe Western Australia).
In the interest of diversifying children’s play; the
City endeavours to provide a mix of playground designs from different suppliers
in order to provide maximum playground variety across a neighbourhood.
Forpark ranked highest overall for all Schedule 1A and 1B
locations and for two of the three Schedule 1C furniture renewal locations.
To ensure sufficient diversification and variability in
playground design, the TET determined the recommended tenderer on per site
basis. Design options were assessed based on the following considerations:
1. Which design
option best meets the City’s requirements; and
2. Which existing
playgrounds are in close proximity to the playground subject to renewal and the
relevant manufacturer details.
Based on the above criteria, the following comments and
recommendations are provided:
|
Table
|
Location
|
Recommended Tenderer
|
Design Option
|
Price
|
Comment
|
|
1A-1
|
Leemans Landing, Two Rocks
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$35,008
|
Meets the City’s
requirements and an existing playground is in close proximity
|
|
1A-2
|
Wanneroo Showground
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$21,800
|
Meets the City’s
requirements,
However, due to operational
requirements, the City has elected to withdraw this park. No tender will be
awarded for Wanneroo Showgrounds.
|
|
1A-3
|
Mist Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$43,564
|
Meets the majority of the
City’s requirements.
|
|
1A-4
|
Blackmore Park
|
Miracle
|
Option 1
|
$65,028
|
Met
the majority of the City’s requirements. Blackmore Park contains an
‘early childhood’ playground which was installed in 2014 by
Miracle.
|
|
1A-5
|
Hainsworth Park
|
Moduplay
|
Option 2
|
$41,220
|
Meets
the City’s requirements. In the interest of playground diversification
and variability it is recommended to proceed with Moduplay Design Option 2.
|
1A-6
|
Homestead Park
|
Moduplay
|
Option 2
|
$113,230
|
In the interest of
playground diversification and variability across it is recommended to
proceed with Moduplay’s Design Option 2.
|
|
1A-7
|
Monoghan Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$54,100
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
|
1A-8
|
Paloma Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$25,788
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
|
1B-1
|
Cherokee Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 2
|
$39,038
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
|
1C-1
|
Hainsworth Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$10,600
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
|
1C-2
|
Paloma Park
|
Forpark
|
Option 1
|
$5,300
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
|
1C-3
|
Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club
|
Moduplay
|
Option 1
|
$2,990
|
Meets the City’s
requirements.
|
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section
3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - “We get active in our local area and we have
many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of
the City's Purchasing Policy.
Financial Implications
A financial assessment was undertaken for Forpark and
Moduplay. Reports indicated that these companies have the financial
standing to complete these works.
It was decided not to undertake a financial assessment for Miracle
based on only the one playground being undertaken, its relative value and that
payment will be approved on completion of the works.
Of the 2015/16 park asset renewals, playground renewals at
Oldham Park in Yanchep and Koondoola Park in Koondoola will be completed
separate to this Tender due to the requirement to construct new playgrounds
following the completion of clubroom construction. These works and the
associated costs (as outlined below as $160,400) will be committed in a
separate tender process, which will cater specifically to the construction
requirements at each location.
The remaining budget surplus fund of $134,444 can be
utilised to renew additional park assets in the following locations:
1. Warradale Park
Community Centre – playground renewal – approximate costs of
$33,600; and
2. Frangipani Park
– playground renewal – approximate costs of $68,568
The renewal of assets at the above locations will occur
through a separate request for quotation arrangement and will be subject to the
availability of City resources prior to the conclusion of the 2015/2016
financial year.
|
Tender 01550 – Park Asset Renewal (PR-1910)
|
|
Description
|
Expenditure
|
Budget
|
|
Budget:
|
|
|
|
Allocated Project Management Budget for 2015/16
|
|
$791,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommended tender
price – Forpark
|
$213,398.00
|
|
|
Recommended tender
price – Miracle
|
$65,028.00
|
|
|
Recommended tender
price – Moduplay
|
$154,450.00
|
|
|
Contingency
|
$39,550
|
|
|
Management fees
|
$23,730
|
|
|
Outstanding project costs to be committed separate to Tender
|
$160,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenditure
|
$656,556
|
|
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender submissions from Hansen
Pty Ltd T/A Forpark Australia Miracle Recreation Equipment and Moduplay Group
Pty Ltd for Tender 01550 for Park Asset renewal at specific locations for
the tendered lump sum price in accordance with the General Conditions of
Tendering as follows:
|
Schedule
|
Location
|
Tenderer
|
Design Option.
|
Lump Sum Price
|
|
Table 1A-1
|
Leemans Landing, Two
Rocks
|
Forpark
|
Design Option 1
|
$35,008.00
|
|
Table 1A-2
|
Wanneroo
Showgrounds, Wanneroo
|
No Tender
Awarded
|
|
Table 1A-3
|
Mist Park, Banksia
Grove
|
Design Option 1
|
$43,564.00
|
|
Table 1A-7
|
Monaghan Park, Darch
|
Design Option 1
|
$54,100.00
|
|
Table 1A-8
|
Paloma Park,
Marangaroo
|
Design Option 1
|
$25,788.00
|
|
Table 1B-1
|
Cherokee Park,
Clarkson
|
Design Option 2
|
$39,038.00
|
|
Table 1C-1
|
Hainsworth Park,
Girrawheen
|
Design Option 1
|
$10,600.00
|
|
Table 1C-2
|
Paloma Park,
Marangaroo
|
Design Option 1
|
$5,300.00
|
|
Table 1A-4
|
Blackmore Park,
Girrawheen
|
Miracle
|
Design Option 1
|
$65,028.00
|
|
Table 1A-5
|
Hainsworth Park,
Girrawheen
|
Moduplay
|
Design Option 2
|
$41,220.00
|
|
Table 1A-6
|
Homestead Park,
Clarkson
|
Design Option 2
|
$113,230.00
|
|
Table 1C-3
|
Mindarie Surf Life
Saving Club, Mindarie
|
Design Option 1
|
$2,990.00
|
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Price of services offered_schedule
summary
|
15/546163
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Park asset submissionmeets
specification's requirements, offers high asset variety and value for money (30%)_schedule
summary
|
15/546166
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - overall ranking_schedule summary
|
15/551102
|
|
Traffic Management
IN07-12/15 Landsdale
Road, Darch - Proposed Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation
Results.
File Ref: 19442
– 15/241254
Responsible
Officer: Director
Assets
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil.
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider the outcome of community consultation for the
proposed Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) along Landsdale Road from Hartman
Drive to Mirrabooka Avenue in Darch. Refer to Attachment 1 for locality
plan.
Background
In response to complaints
received from residents relating to speeding and hoon driving on Landsdale Road between Hartman Drive to
Mirrabooka Avenue, the City conducted traffic counts to investigate the traffic
volumes and vehicle speeds along this section of road. The traffic data
collected indicated that a large proportion of drivers were travelling above
the posted speed limit of 60km/hr. Traffic counts undertaken in two locations
along Landsdale Road in June 2013 revealed the following information:
Landsdale Road East of
Hartman Drive
Average Weekday Traffic (AWT) =
2188 Vehicles Per Day (Vpd)
85th Percentile speed
(where 85% of vehicles are travelling below 64Km/h with 15% travelling above
64Km/h) = 64 Km/hr
Landsdale Road East of
Evandale Road
Average Weekday Traffic (AWT) =
1411 Vehicles Per Day (Vpd)
85th Percentile speed
(where 85% of vehicles are travelling below 68Km/h with 15% travelling above
68Km/h) = 68 Km/hr
The City has also received
complaints regarding the poor condition of a section of the verge area adjacent
to Landsdale Park. This section of the carriageway edge is yet to be kerbed
with the verge area currently in an untidy state and requires attention.
Council at its meeting of 12
November 2013 (IN03-11/13 refers), considered a report on speed limit reduction
on a number of roads in Darch and Landsdale which included this section of
Landsdale Road and resolved as follows:
1. “SUPPORTS
the reduction of the posted speed limit on Kingsway, Landsdale Road, Furniss
Road and Driver Road from 60km/h to 50km/h; and
2. REQUESTS Main
Roads WA undertake a speed zone review of Kingsway, Landsdale Road, Furniss
Road and Driver Road with the intent of reducing the speed limit from 60km/h to
50km/h.”
Following the City’s
request for Main Roads WA (MRWA) to reduce the speed limit for the above roads,
MRWA response dated 17 June 2014 advised as follow:-
“Main Roads have always
advocated that physical devices are the most effective method of lowering
vehicle speeds, and ensuring these lower speeds remain self-regulating. To
maintain the integrity of a lower speed environment, Council will need to first
install traffic calming devices along the lengths of the named roads as without
any physical traffic calming measures installed the suggested proposed 50 km/h
speed limit would see very little if any compliance without constant Police
enforcement.
While the control of speed is
an important aspect in effective traffic management, it should not necessarily
be assumed that the imposition of a lower speed limit will resolve all
perceived safety problems on a road or will necessarily alter travel speeds.
Experience in Australia and overseas has demonstrated that arbitrarily imposed
speed limits which are unrealistically low are not respected and actual
operating speeds remain at the same levels. Realistic speeds limits however,
can be effective in regulating traffic flow and reducing crashes because the
majority of motorists will voluntarily observe them.
At this stage, Main Roads
considers the existing 60 km/h posted speed limits along the above named roads
to be appropriate and in keeping with the road use and environment, supplied
traffic data and motorists expectations.
Should
Council wish to pursue a reduced speed limit for the above named roads at a
later date and after traffic calming measures have been introduced for some
time (6-12 months) along with recent classifier data, the City of Wanneroo may
wish to re-submit the original request for Main Roads consideration.”
As a result, a project for the
installation of a TMS along Landsdale Road between Hartman Drive and Mirrabooka
Avenue has been listed in the City’s approved 2015/2016 Capital Works
Program.
Detail
Landsdale Road between Hartman Drive and Mirrabooka Avenue
in the suburb of Darch, is 1.6km long and is classified within the City's
Functional Road Hierarchy as a Local Distributor Road. This road functions to
distribute traffic to local residential access roads, servicing residential
dwellings fronting this road, as well as accommodating traffic volumes up to
6,000 vehicles per day.
The Average Weekday Traffic counts recorded for this road
have been in the region of 2,000 vehicles per day which indicates that this
section of Landsdale Road is operating well within its capacity. The section of
Landsdale Road from Hartman Drive to Evandale Road is both a Transperth and
school bus route.
Landsdale Road, prior to the current urbanisation, was
formerly a rural road serving rural properties and market gardens and has been
progressively upgraded by developers in conjunction with the adjacent urban
subdivision developments. This section of Landsdale Road has been planned and
upgraded with a pavement width of 7.6m. There is however, a 70m section
of this road that remains a rural standard road with a pavement width of
5.7m. There are also several other sections that remain un-kerbed which
are adjacent to land that is yet to be subdivided to urban residential lots. A
schematic map detailing the existing road and pathway infrastructure along this
section of Landsdale Road is shown at Attachment 2.
The majority of properties fronting Landsdale Road are
residential dwellings. Several other larger land parcels make up the remaining
lots that front onto this road; these include Lot 43, Lot 567 (Landsdale Farm
School), Landsdale Park and Landsdale Plants Nursery’s Lots 30, 31, 32
and 39.
A pedestrian pathway has been constructed on the south side
of Landsdale Road from Hartman Drive to Evandale Road, excluding the sections
fronting Lot 43 and Lot 39 (depicted as Sections A and C in Attachment 2).
From Evandale Road, the pathway switches to the north side of the road and
continues onto Mirrabooka Avenue. This pathway has been constructed by
developers as part of the adjacent subdivision development.
A TMS for Landsdale Road was developed taking into
consideration its road transport function and configuration including future
residential development, number and proximity of crossovers and accommodating
the passage of public transport buses.
In developing a cost effective traffic management plan for
community consultation, Administration considered the following aspects:
· Road
function and configuration;
· Intersections;
· Crossovers;
· Pathways;
· Lighting;
· Traffic
treatment spacing; and
· Bus
routes
Option 1 : Median Treatment - Road widening and
provision of median islands
The existing road pavement width is not wide enough to
accommodate this option, as this option would involve the widening of the
existing road pavement and the reconstruction of existing kerbing with most of
the adjacent residential properties verges and crossovers already established.
The majority of the existing pathways have also been constructed immediately
behind the kerb which will require reconstruction. This option involves
significant civil works and was not considered to be a suitable option.
Option 2: Horizontal Deflection Devices, slow points,
chicanes or blister islands
Residential properties along Landsdale Road have property
frontages 18m to 20m wide each with 6m wide crossovers resulting in the
crossovers being in close proximity to each other. Coupled with this, there are
10 existing road intersections with a further two planned intersections in the
future subdivision development of the undeveloped lots. Each of these devices
requires approach/departure tapers and transitional treatments which will
invariably block access to residential crossovers where these devices are
located. As a result of these restrictions along the stretch of road, the
ability to strategically locate horizontal deflection devices is limited to
achieve satisfactory outcomes.
This option would adversely impact on adjoining residences
and therefore this option was not considered to be a suitable option.
Option 3: Vertical Displacement Devices, such as Speed
Cushions
This option involves the installation of nine sets of 1.6m
wide speed cushions, strategically placed and adequately spaced along the
stretch of Landsdale Road as shown on City Drawing No. 2946-1-0 and 2946-2-0
(Attachment 3 refers).
To ensure that the desired effect of traffic management is
achieved, it is important that the relative distance between devices is kept
constant. If the treatments are placed too close, drivers may become frustrated
and seek alternative routes through local access streets or engage in
anti-social behaviour. Should the treatments be placed too far apart, the
overall effect will be lost and drivers will accelerate/decelerate between
devices.
Rubber bollards are also proposed to be installed adjacent
to the kerbs to prevent motorists mounting and traversing the verge area in
order to avoid the speed cushions.
Although these devices will increase general vehicle noise,
they have proven to be very effective in facilitating speed reduction and to
deter hoon behaviour. They are also acceptable for emergency vehicles and on
PTA bus routes, as the wheel bases of larger vehicles such as buses are wide
enough to straddle the individual cushions.
The installation of any traffic treatment device will
require street lighting to be provided to Australian Standards (AS1158, Section
3.2.6.1) to ensure that these treatments are clearly visible at night. In order
to ensure the project is cost effective, the speed cushions were located,
wherever possible, to take advantage of any existing street lighting. Where
there was no opportunity for this to occur, additional street lighting is
proposed.
This option was considered to be the most cost effective.
Consultation
In May
2015, the City presented the proposed TMS for community consultation to determine the views of affected
residents and property owners. The TMS included installation of a series of rubberised
speed cushions, kerbing along the frontage of Landsdale Park and mulching of
the nature reserve abutting Landsdale Park as indicated in the concept plan (refer
to Attachment 3). The community consultation took the form of 109 letters to all residences
directly abutting to the section of Landsdale Road between Hartman Drive and
Mirrabooka Avenue (refer to Attachment 4), notification on the City’s website and street signs
erected on the relevant section of Landsdale Road.
Consultation
began on 22 May 2015 and closed on 12 June 2015 and attracted a good response rate of 40%. 44 respondents
(80%) were in agreement with the proposal and nine (20%) against. Thirteen of
the replies came from properties not abutting Landsdale Road, however most are
located close enough to be regular users of Landsdale Road. There is a clear
majority of respondents (80%) in agreement with this proposed TMS.
Survey respondents were also given the option to provide
additional comments for consideration by the City. The comments relevant to
Landsdale Road have been reviewed and considered by Administration and are
listed below.
|
Respondents Comments
|
Administrations Response
|
|
Concern over bus stop relocation
and request to install bus bays.
|
Preliminary discussion held with the Public Transport
Authority (PTA) regarding bus stops. The City will discuss this further with
PTA and request for a bus embayment at the existing bus terminus location.
|
|
Concern with the road width
adjacent to the properties, numbers 12 and 38.
|
The road will be widened at these sections and
resurfaced adjacent to property number 38, as part of this project.
|
|
Install cycle lanes.
|
There is insufficient road width to provide cycle
lanes on Landsdale Road.
|
|
Existing pathway is not
continuous; sections of path are missing from adjoining properties, numbers
12 and 38.
|
Pathways will be installed adjacent to these two
properties.
|
|
Reduction in cushion numbers
and/or their relocation.
|
The location/separation of speed cushions is governed
by Main Roads WA guidelines as well as the opportunities
presented by existing infrastructure (i.e. intersections and crossovers). The
locations of the speed cushions detailed on the concept plans have been
designed with consideration of these restrictions and any removal/relocation
will impact the effectiveness of these treatments.
|
|
Utilisation of fixed Speed
Cameras
|
WA Police is the responsible authority for installing
speed cameras.
|
|
Modified Landsdale Road for Local
Traffic Only.
|
Landsdale Road is classified as a local distributor
and therefore its function in the road network is to distribute traffic and
hence modification of Landsdale Road for local traffic only may disrupt this
network.
|
|
Request for more street lighting
at Evandale Road intersection.
|
The existing lighting is considered adequate for the
intersection of the class of roads.
|
|
Increase line marking and number
of speed signs.
|
Pavement marking and signage are undertaken by Main
Roads WA and only when installed with associated traffic treatments are
considered to be effective to reduce speed or hooning behaviour. However this
proposed TMS will substantially increase the amount of line marking on the
road.
|
|
Several alternative devices have
been suggested, such as blister islands and roundabouts.
|
The alterative devices suggested are horizontal
displacement devices. Landsdale Road does not provide sufficient opportunity
to install such devices.
|
|
Lower speed limit from 60km/h to
50km/h
|
The City will request Main Roads WA for speed limit
reduction on Landsdale Road after the installation of the traffic
treatments.
|
In
addition to the above comments the residents who did not support the proposed scheme
provided following comments:
|
Respondents Comments
|
Administrations Response
|
|
Noise concern
|
While speed cushions can generate some noise it is an
acceptable traffic treatment by Main Roads WA and Austroads. The overall
benefit of reduced speeding outweighs the inconvenience generated by the
noise.
|
|
Speed cushions attract hoons
|
The City’s previous experience on other
locations suggests that speed cushions are effective in reducing speeding and
hooning. The City will undertake post construction traffic count to analyse
the effectiveness of the treatment.
|
|
The proposal would be disruptive
for undeveloped lands
|
The current proposal has been prepared by keeping
minimum infrastructure adjacent to vacant land. Considering the large size of
the undeveloped land it is unlikely that the proposed treatment will have any
negative effect on those developments. However, the issue can be reviewed as
part of the development approval process.
|
|
Does not support the proposed
locations of speed cushions
|
The location/separation of speed cushions is governed
by Main Roads WA guidelines as well as the opportunities presented by
existing infrastructure (i.e. intersections and crossovers). The locations of
the speed cushions detailed on the concept plans have been designed with
consideration of these restrictions and any removal/relocation will impact the
effectiveness of these treatments.
|
|
Concern over buses parking on
Landsdale Road for long time
|
Preliminary discussion held with the Public Transport
Authority (PTA) regarding bus stops. The City will discuss this further with
PTA and request for a bus embayment at the existing bus terminus location.
|
Comment
Prior to finalising the outcomes of the community
consultation, due to a relatively lower traffic volume in Landsdale Road, MRWA
was requested to consider approving the default built up area speed limit of
50km/h for Landsdale Road. This would have allowed the City to achieve the
outcome of a reduced posted speed without having to implement the TMS, however
MRWA has not supported the City’s request, citing the higher 85th
percentile speed a concern. Therefore the need to implement TMS devices remains
and will assist in lowering the speed in Landsdale Road. While the City has
been considering the outcomes of the community consultation, the community was
advised by mail, dated 13 October 2015, that a report will considered by
Council at its meeting on 8 December 2015.
The traffic treatment proposed is a series of nine sets of
rubberised speed cushions to both facilitate speed reduction and to deter hoon
behaviour. The installation of speed cushions in this format has been proven to
be effective in encouraging safer vehicle speeds and deterring hoon behaviour
while having little effect on the larger vehicles such as emergency vehicles
and buses.
The City has previously installed rubberised speed cushions
at a number of locations with success in reducing vehicle speeds.
The consultation in May/June 2015 provided a response rate
of 40% which is considered a good representation of the community's view. The
overwhelming support received from 35 of the 44 respondents is a positive
indicator that the community is in favour of the proposed TMS. In reviewing the
comments made by the community, it is evident that the community is concerned
with speeding and hooning along Landsdale Road. Given that Landsdale Road is a
PTA bus route, the proposed speed cushions will offer the best traffic control
solution. The cushions will mitigate speeding and hooning vehicles while
allowing the wider buses to straddle the speed cushions, Therefore the proposed
treatment is expected to be an effective measure in addressing the residents'
concerns.
In reply to the City’s notification of this proposed
Traffic Management Scheme, the Public Transport Authority (PTA) has no
objections to these works and given its support for the use of speed cushions
as its busses can straddle either side of these cushions and not affect
passengers.
Since the Elected Member’s Briefing Session held on 1
December 2015, further clarification was sought from PTA regarding the bus
terminus at Bus Stop no. 26163, adjacent to 27 Landsdale Road and a site visit
was undertaken. PTA buses are currently stopping at the bus terminus for
approximately 20 minutes by partly parking on the verge and partly on the
carriageway and during the site visit the damage to the road verge and kerb by
the use of PTA buses was noted. There is another school bus stop, bus stop no.
23480, located just opposite the terminus bus stop adjacent to 30 Landsdale
Road. The TMS proposes the installation of a set of speed cushion is proposed
at this location and the relocation of bus stops. PTA has provided further
feedback to the City advising it doesn’t support the relocation of these
two bus stops, 26163 and 23480 and suggested that the City investigates an
alternate location for speed cushions. Due to site constraints, it is not
feasible to relocate the speed cushions and the removal of this set of cushions
will compromise the effectiveness of the overall treatment. Administration
recommends PTA installs bus embayment to improve safety at the bus
stop/terminus and to avoid verge damage. The City will liaise with PTA in this
regard in the detailed design stage of the project. Therefore the installation
of speed cushions at this location will be subject to the outcome of
discussions with PTA.
In response to issues raised during community consultation,
the following changes have been made to the proposed TMS as reflected in
Drawing Nos. 2946-1-1 and 2946-2-1 (Attachment 5):
· Inclusion
of road widening, kerbing and pathways adjacent to property numbers 12 and 38.
· Inclusion
of road resurfacing adjacent to property number 38.
· Relocation
of bus stops.
The estimated cost of the TMS is in the order of
$250,000 and other road infrastructure renewal works is $85,000.
Based on the support from a majority of the respondents, it
is recommended that the TMS be approved with the above additions as proposed in City's Concept Drawing No. 2946-1-1
and 2946-2-1 (Attachment 5).
Subject to Council’s decision on the recommendation
made in this report, the detailed design of the proposed works is scheduled to
be undertaken by February 2016 and construction works undertaken during
May/June 2016. This schedule will be subject to Western Power’s
availability to complete the street lighting upgrades prior to installation of
the speed cushions.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe
Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
An amount of $250,000 has been allocated in PR-2878 –
Traffic Treatments – Landsdale Road in the 2015/2016 Capital Works Budget
for the implementation of this project.
Infrastructure renewal works, road widening and resurfacing
to this section of Landsdale Road is estimated at $85,000 and can be
accommodated from Project No 1087 – Annual Transport Infrastructure
Renewal Program, noting that Council approved an increase in the overall budget
allocation for this program by $68,384 in November 2015 (refer Item No
IN01-11/15).
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES
the proposed Traffic Management Scheme for Landsdale Road for construction as
shown on the City of Wanneroo Drawings No. 2946-1-1 and 2946-2-1 (Attachment 5)
and NOTES that the installation of speed cushions set adjacent to 27 Landsdale
Road will be subject to further discussions with Public Transport Authority at
the detailed design stage of this project;
2. WRITES
to Public Transport Authority requesting the construction of bus embayment on Landsdale
Road for the bus terminus to improve safety and to avoid infrastructure damage;
3. NOTES
that infrastructure renewal works in this section of Landsdale Road will also
be undertaken in conjunction with the implementation of the Traffic management Scheme
in accordance with resolution 1 above; and
4. ADVISES
the survey respondents of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Landsdale Road, Darch - Traffic Management Scheme -
Locality Plan
|
15/298596
|
|
|
2.
|
Landsdale Road, Darch - Existing Road and Pathway
Infrastructure
|
15/412562
|
|
|
3.
|
Landsdale Road, Darch - TMS - Concept Plans 2946-1-0
2946-2-0
|
15/300360
|
|
|
4.
|
Landsdale Road, Landsdale - TMS - Community
Consultation Letter
|
15/300625
|
|
|
5.
|
Landsdale Road, Darch - TMS - Concept Plans 2946-1-1
2946-2-1
|
15/300636
|
Minuted
|
Community
Development
Capacity Building
CD01-12/15 Community
Funding Program October 2015 Round
File Ref: 19964
– 15/534778
Responsible
Officer: Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider applications from community groups requesting
funding through the City's Community Funding Program October 2015 round for
specified projects, activities or events.
Background
There are two funding rounds per financial year, in March
and October. This funding round represents the first round for the
2015/2016 financial year. Assessment criteria and eligibility requirements
are detailed in the City's Community Funding Policy.
The Community Funding Working Group met on Tuesday 3
November 2015 to discuss and make recommendations for the Community Funding
Program October 2015 round as follows:
“1. APPROVES
$1,726.00 to Playgroup WA (auspicing Trinity Playgroup) via Community Event
Funding for the Playgroup Open Day on 11 February 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a
renewed certificate of public liability insurance;
2. APPROVES
$2,977.50 to the Landsdale Residents Association via Community Event Funding
for the Landsdale Neighbour Day 2016 on 12 March 2016;
3. APPROVES
$5,616.30 or, a lesser amount should a scaled-down event become
necessary if Lotterywest and Healthway funding is not obtained, to the
West Australian Folk Federation via Community Event Funding for the West
Australian Folk Federation Urban Folk Day on 28 May 2016;
4. APPROVES
$1,915.48 to the Pheonix Calisthenics Club via Community Event Funding for the
Have a Go and Family Fun Day on 30 January 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a renewed
certificate of public liability insurance;
5. APPROVES
$1,589.80 to Communified (Inc) via Community Event Funding for Communified
(Inc) Community of Wanneroo Launch Incorporating Information and Education
Session on 13 February 2016;
6. APPROVES
$1,735.00 to the Quinns Rocks Environmental Group via Community Development
Funding for a Community Environmental Education Series from 20 February 2016 to
11 June 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a renewed certificate of public liability
insurance;
7. APPROVES
$998.65 to the North Coastal Children’s Community Choir Inc (Pending) via
Community Event Funding for the North Coastal Children’s Community Choir
Come and Try Day on 13 March 2016 SUBJECT to receipt Certificate of
Incorporation and a certificate for public liability insurance;
8. APPROVES
$3,000 to Women’s Health and Family Services via Community Development
Funding for Community Building through Group Art Therapy and Art Making from 9
February 2016 to 28 June 2016.”
Detail
Eight (8) applications were received by the closing date of
20 October 2015. Two (2) applications are for community development
funding and sic (6) are for community event funding.
Six (6) of the applications received were from first-time
Community Funding applicants.
The table below identifies the number of applications
received from each Ward:
|
Ward
|
Community Event
Funding
|
Community
Development Project Funding
|
|
North Coast
|
1
|
1
|
|
Central
|
1
|
0
|
|
South
|
1
|
0
|
|
Outside of the City
(but project/event is
taking place within the City).
|
4
|
|
|
Outside of the City
(and project/event is
taking place outside of the City)
|
0
|
0
|
A complete compilation of applications and relevant
attachments was provided to each member of the working group including deputy
delegates. A copy was also made available in the Elected Members' Reading
Room. A summary report of applications is provided (Attachment 1).
Consultation
Community Funding briefing sessions were provided to
Community & Place Directorate teams. These sessions continued to
build a team understanding of the program, further equipping teams to
participate in a whole-of-team approach to promotion and delivery of the
Community Funding Program.
This commitment to incorporating a whole-of-team approach
has contributed towards six (6) of the eight (8) submitted applications being
from first time applicants to the program.
Comment
The Community Funding Program October 2015 round promotion
included an advertisement the City’s Wanneroo Link on 1 September
2015. An article was also included in the City’s What’s
Happening Publication September 2015 Edition. Email notifications were
sent to all eligible organisations on the Community Links Community Asset Data
Base. Community & Place Directorate teams distributed information
throughout their networks and databases. Promotion also occurred via the
City’s website, Facebook page, organisational Nabo profile, the ground
floor Customer Relations area digital screen and posters and brochures
displayed at the Wanneroo Library Cultural Centre and across the City’s
libraries and community centres.
A total of 40 telephone and email enquiries were received
regarding applications for the October 2015 round. Of these enquiries, 22 were
regarding initiatives identified as ineligible for Community Funding. Main
reasons for ineligibility included:
· Funding
support was required for one-off items or for equipment rather than a community
development project or event.
· The
initiative was intended as a fundraiser or for profit-making.
· The
March 2015 round for requesting Christmas 2015 event support had been missed.
· The
enquiring applicant was a business.
· The
group was already in receipt of community funding not yet acquitted.
Twenty one (21) enquirers were provided with information
about the City’s Donations and Waiver of Fees and Charges Program
and five (5) were provided with information on external funding
opportunities. Ten (10) were encouraged and assisted to undertake further
project or event planning for application readiness for the next round of
funding.
Of the enquiries received, four (4) were from Culturally and
Linguistically Diverse (CALD) groups, one (1) from a disability group, one (1)
from an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander group and four (4) were early
childhood/family-related.
One-to-one assistance in completing the on-line application
process was provided via telephone upon request by applicant groups.
Community Links Team staff members responded to centre-based and ward-based
group enquiries regarding the community funding round. The City’s
Youth Services and Healthy Communities teams also supported and encouraged potential
applicant groups in their networks.
Since the October 2014 round and leading up to the October
2015 round, Community & Place Directorate teams have received Community
Funding Program briefings. Delivery of briefings will continue between
funding rounds while the Community Funding Program framework is reviewed for
improving community and place strengthening as a part of the City’s
structural realignment.
Enquiries received for this community funding round again
highlighted the following challenges experienced by community groups:
· Limited
project/event (including budgetary) planning by community groups prior to
applying for external funding support.
· Little
knowledge of the suite of funding support programs offered by the City.
· Insufficient
self-assessment regarding eligibility of their initiative for community funding
and other funding opportunities.
A coordinated approach to address the above challenges and
better support community groups will be introduced over the next 12 to 18
months. Proposed initiatives including leadership forums, information
workshops, one-to-one in-reach meetings and community group peer-support
meetings are currently being considered for the future.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
2.2 Healthy
and Active People – We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities
to experience a healthy lifestyle.
2.3 Safe
Communities – We feel at home in our local area.
4 Civic
Leadership – Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working
with Others – The Community is a desirable place to live and work as the
City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Productive Communities
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Director Community & Place
|
Manage
|
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this
report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic
risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve
the existing management systems.”
Policy Implications
Administration has assessed the applications against the
Community Funding Policy and provided recommendations for each application.
The Community Funding Working Group voted and carried
unanimously to recommend to Council that these submissions are approved.
The City’s Community Funding Policy is currently
scheduled for review. It is anticipated that the policy will require only minor
changes at this stage to standardise terminology, improve clarity and
incorporate administrative changes which reflect change of service unit
responsibility for program delivery. It is anticipated that this policy review
will be presented to Council for consideration at the March 2016 Council
Meeting in advance of the next funding round.
The policy will be subject to further review in the
following 12 to 18 months as a Community Funding Program review is progressed.
Once implementation of the new Place Strengthening Service Unit has progressed
and the team provides opportunities for the community to share their ideas to potentially
reinvigorate the approach to community funding, the further review will be
informed by this input.
Financial
Implications
It is noted that a total amount of $19,558.73 was requested
from eight (8) community funding applications. The average request for
this funding round is $2,444.84.
Of the eight (8) community funding applications received,
six (6) were for community events totalling $14,823.73 (76% of the total
community funding requested in the October 2015 round) and two (2) applications
were for community development projects totalling $4,735.00 (24% of the total
community funding request in the October 2015 round).
The value of Administration recommendations in the October
2015 round of Community Funding for consideration is $19,558.73. This
leaves a balance of $2,714.62 for distribution in the March 2015 round.
The Community Funding Program October 2015 round is funded
through the 2015/2016 adopted budget for Community Funding. The current GL
account is 717253-1205-316.
The Community Funding Program March 2016 round is funded
through the 2016/2017 adopted budget for Community Funding, with payments made
early in July 2016.
|
Annual Community Funding
Budget 2015/16
Less March 2015 round
payments, 2015 Community Christmas Celebration commitments and 2016 Hallmark
Event commitments
Balance available for
October 2015 round
Less value of
Administration recommendations for October 2015 round
|
$80,000.00
$57,726.65
$22,273.35
$19,558.73
|
|
EXPECTED BALANCE OF FUNDS FOR MARCH 2015 ROUND
|
$2,714.62
|
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
$1,726.00 to Playgroup WA (auspicing Trinity Playgroup) via Community Event
Funding for the Playgroup Open Day on 11 February 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a renewed
certificate of public liability insurance;
2. APPROVES
$2,977.50 to the Landsdale Residents Association via Community Event Funding
for the Landsdale Neighbour Day 2016 on 12 March 2016;
3. APPROVES
$5,616.30 or, a lesser amount should a scaled-down event become
necessary if Lotterywest and Healthway funding is not obtained, to the
West Australian Folk Federation via Community Event Funding for the West
Australian Folk Federation Urban Folk Day on 28 May 2016;
4. APPROVES
$1,915.48 to the Pheonix Calisthenics Club via Community Event Funding for the
Have a Go and Family Fun Day on 30 January 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a renewed
certificate of public liability insurance;
5. APPROVES
$1,589.80 to Communified (Inc) via Community Event Funding for Communified
(Inc) Community of Wanneroo Launch Incorporating Information and Education
Session on 13 February 2016;
6. APPROVES
$1,735.00 to the Quinns Rocks Environmental Group via Community Development
Funding for a Community Environmental Education Series from 20 February 2016 to
11 June 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of a renewed certificate of public liability
insurance;
7. APPROVES
$998.65 to the North Coastal Children’s Community Choir Inc (Pending) via
Community Event Funding for the North Coastal Children’s Community Choir
Come and Try Day on 13 March 2016 SUBJECT to receipt Certificate of
Incorporation and a certificate for public liability insurance; and
8. APPROVES
$3,000 to Women’s Health and Family Services via Community Development
Funding for Community Building through Group Art Therapy and Art Making from 9
February 2016 to 28 June 2016.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Summary Report of applications received in Oct 2015
round
|
15/517592
|
|
CD02-12/15 Installation
of commemorative plaque at Wanneroo War Memorial
File Ref: 16255
– 15/561802
Responsible
Officer: Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the placement
of a commemorative plaque within the City of Wanneroo’s War Memorial
Precinct.
Background
The Perth North Sub-section of the Naval Association of
Australia has been conducting Commemorative Services at the City of
Wanneroo’s War Memorial for a number of years.
2016 commemorates the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Long
Tan in Vietnam and the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) is offering grant
funding to commemorate this. The Naval Association of Australia
participated in the Battle with 17 RAN ships in addition to the Clearance
Divers Group and the RAN Helicopter Flight involved.
The Perth North Sub-section of the Naval Association of
Australia intends to submit an application for funding to DVA under the
‘Saluting the Services’ project for a plaque to commemorate their
involvement and is seeking the City’s support to install the plaque,
should the application be successful, in an appropriate location within the
Wanneroo War Memorial precinct. The grant application will also cover
costs of a dedication ceremony to unveil the plaque in August or September
2016.
Detail
Details of the proposed plaque are as follows:
· Bronze
plaque 560mm by 300mm.
· Plaque
to contain; ‘IN MEMORY OF’, crest, the names of the RAN ships that
saw service in Vietnam and the Clearance Divers Group and RAN Helicopter Flight.
Installation is proposed for August or September 2016
followed by an appropriate Dedication Ceremony. This will be organised and
funded by the Perth North Sub-section of the Naval Association of Australia.
Consultation
There has been consultation with representatives of the Perth
North Sub-section of the Naval Association of Australia, the Wanneroo Joondalup
RSL and the City’s Governance, Facilities and Planning Teams in the
preparation of this report.
Comment
Placement of the plaque is in line with the City of
Wanneroo’s ‘Naming of City Assets and Memorials Policy’,
specifically: Category 2 – Commemorating individuals, groups or events
through Memorials and/or Commemorative Plaques.
Administration recommends that the plaque is placed on the
semi-circular wall that frames the war memorial obelisk. The wall has an
existing plaque and has the capacity for more plaques to be added (if
required). The Wanneroo Joondalup RSL has indicated its support for this
project and location. The location is also supported by the above policy
which states:
· “Memorials are to be appropriately located.
Applicants must consider whether the memorial will enrich a public open space
and should be carefully balanced against public benefits;
· Not compromise the aesthetic integrity of the site nor
interfere or disturb the fabric or character of the proposed site.”
The placement of the plaque provides an opportunity for the
City to support veterans and acknowledge the efforts of ex-servicemen who
served in the Vietnam War. The plaque offers the opportunity to respectfully
provide an enduring legacy to these veterans and provide a focal point for
community response and expressions of support.
As per the Policy, the Perth North Sub-section of the Naval
Association of Australia intends to cover all costs associated with the design,
manufacture, installation and maintenance of the plaque and the organisation
and funding of the commemorative ceremony.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk
Management Considerations
There is no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the
City’s existing risk registers which relates to the issue contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Naming of City Assets and Memorials Policy.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS
the placement by the Perth North Sub-section of the Naval Association of
Australia of a memorial plaque acknowledging the naval vessels involved in the
Long Tan Battle in Vietnam, on the semi-circular wall of the Wanneroo War
Memorial subject to finalisation of negotiations; and
2. APPROVES
the Perth North Sub-section of the Naval Association of Australia holding a
Ceremony of Dedication to acknowledge the installation of the plaque.
Attachments: Nil
Program Services
CD03-12/15 Update
on Homelessness and Sleeping Rough in the North Western Corridor
File Ref: 21024
– 15/500374
Responsible
Officer: Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Previous Items: MN06-03/15
Agenda; MN06-03/15
Resolution
Homelessness
and Sleeping Rough in the Northern Corridor
Issue
To propose the City’s approach and actions in
addressing homelessness in Wanneroo and the North Western Corridor in response
to the Motion on Notice MN06-03/15 and CD02-09/15 and the final research report
received from the City of Joondalup.
Background
Council, at its meeting of 31 March 2015, requested as
follows:
“That Council
REQUESTS the Chief Executive
Officer prepare a report for consideration at a future Council meeting
addressing the incidence of homelessness and sleeping rough in the City of
Wanneroo and the North Western Corridor. The report should consider, but not be
limited to, partnering with an adjoining Local Government Authority to co-host
a Full Time Equivalent shared resource, the allocation of space at an
appropriate City facility as a Drop-in Centre, identification of appropriate
funds to fit-out a Drop-In Centre and active participation in the Homelessness
Action Group to co-ordinate and facilitate relevant State Government
Departments and Not For Profit organisations”.
The City continues to develop its response
to homelessness through the development of a reporting protocol and developing
partnerships with agencies servicing the needs of people at risk or
experiencing protocols.
To provide further information on the
impact of homelessness in the northern metropolitan region Shelter WA was commissioned by the City of Joondalup to investigate the prevalence, contributing factors and options to reduce homelessness
within the City and the northern corridor and to explore the
development of a drop in or resource centre within the City of Joondalup to
provide supportive links to relevant agencies.
As a Local Government
operating in a similar geographical area and as a member partner with the City
of Joondalup in the Joondalup and Wanneroo Interagency Homelessness Action
Group (JWIHAG) it is recognised that the report findings can provide the City of
Wanneroo with recommendations and future direction of the City of
Wanneroo’s response to homelessness.
Detail
The Shelter WA report and the City of
Wanneroo’s own data highlighted the current trends relating to pathways
leading to homelessness including:
· Housing stress, driven by accumulated
debt;
· Access to affordable housing (data shows
that of the total social housing stock available in WA 0.97% were located in
the City of Joondalup and 2.93% in the City of Wanneroo);
· Women with/without children escaping
domestic and family violence;
· Young people, on their own or in small
groups, as a result of family conflict; and
· People with underlying mental health
conditions, who have difficulty maintaining housing and/or become homeless on
release from hospital.
There are services available in Joondalup
and Wanneroo aimed at assisting people
in these situations, however, as
with many homelessness services around the state, they are unable to meet increased demand
with existing resources for example, the Patricia Giles Centre, a refuge for women
and children escaping family/domestic violence, was forced to turn away 23 women
and children in May-July 2015 due to a lack of capacity.
Recent data presented by the
report shows in a 4 month period (May to August 2015), that 20 people have been
reported as experiencing homelessness in the City of Joondalup and a total of
21 people reporting homelessness or at risk of homelessness in the City of
Wanneroo.
There is no single profile of people who are experiencing homelessness, it reaches
across ages and includes people with complex needs, such as alcohol or drug misuse, as well as those unable to keep up with increasing
costs of living.
Because people experiencing
homelessness have diverse
life experiences, challenges and needs, a range of services is required to
address varied circumstances.
The report refers to research
that shows that many people who present as homeless as adults, first
experienced homelessness as child, suggesting that preventative approaches will
help future generations to avoid homelessness. Additionally, service providers
reported an increasing incidence of homelessness amongst those who had never
previously required assistance, in particular seniors, due to the increased
cost of living.
The report supports an
approach of addressing homelessness through a collective response, including
service providers, faith-based organisations, private industry and local
government. A collective impact model, which has been used successfully in
other locations to tackle homelessness, would be an appropriate approach that
would incorporate those identified stakeholders as well as engaging other key
stakeholders including all levels of government, WA Police, the justice system
and those experiencing homelessness. Through a collective impact approach a
regional framework could be developed that would realise significant
achievements in tackling and preventing the issue including integration of
services, reduction in services competition and duplication, advocacy and
influence in policy formation, funding allocations and new initiatives.
A key recommendation of the
report is the development of a Regional Homelessness Strategy as a
collaborative approach for the City of Joondalup and the City of Wanneroo, with
clear partnership processes for
the
Cities to align with
local services, as well as other local governments and Western Australian Local Government
Association (WALGA) to advocate to State and Commonwealth agencies for continued policy development and funding to address homelessness. Key components of the strategy would
include partnering with existing service providers, provision of on-going
education for front line City employees, sharing of information with WA Police
and other relevant agencies and advocating for the development of social and
affordable housing that are accessible to our residents.
Consultation
Shelter WA engaged with a range
of different stakeholders throughout this project, including service providers and people who
have experienced homelessness in the Joondalup area, to determine the
prevalence of homelessness in and around the City of Joondalup and establish the extent of current
service provision and gaps.
Stakeholder consultations included:
· Interviews with 27 key stakeholders;
· Workshop with members of the JWIHAG;
· Survey of 26 people who experienced
homelessness in Joondalup;
· Examining
social media for issues relating to homelessness in Joondalup; and
· Follow up survey of 17 JWIHAG members relating to the establishment of a drop-in centre.
Shelter WA’s recommendations are based on stakeholder consultations as well as local, national and international housing and homelessness desktop research.
The City of Wanneroo
participated in the research project through the external consultation
workshop, an individual interview with the consultant and the provision of
homelessness statistics provided by the City’s Financial Counselling
service and other partners.
Comment
The City has introduced a number
of initiatives to be better placed to provide support for people at risk, or
experiencing homelessness in the City of Wanneroo. The City of
Wanneroo and the City of Joondalup have continued to work collaboratively in
this area and the report findings provide future direction, highlighting the
need for a regional homelessness strategy to provide a framework for the work
going forward. To facilitate the development of the strategy and the actions
developed (ie partnership development) a shared resource will be required to
coordinate this work.
A regional
strategy aimed at preventing and addressing homelessness would assist in
guiding the City in clarifying its role as well as the role of other
stakeholders to more collectively and successfully take action on the issues
associated with homelessness.
Contact has
been received by the two Cities from RUAH Community Services, who are looking
to undertake an activity in February next year titled “Registry
Week” that will investigate the numbers of people who are homeless or
sleeping rough - whilst aimed at Perth City it has opened the opportunity to
also explore this region. This is viewed as a beneficial step to verify
accuracy of data available and inform strategy development.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic
or Corporate risks within the City's existing risks registers which relates to
the issues contained in this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
It is proposed that the City
will contribute to the report already commissioned by the City of Joondalup due
to its relevance and opportunity to inform the City’s role in tackling
homelessness. An appropriate contribution will need to be negotiated with City
of Joondalup, with total project cost for the report as yet unknown. A further
cost of $5,000 will be incurred to participate in the RUAH event next year and
potentially in resourcing development of a regional strategy. Any expenses will
be covered by the City’s 2015/16 operating budget
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. APPROVES
the development of a regional homelessness strategy in conjunction with City of
Joondalup and instructs Administration to arrange a meeting in early 2016 to
commence this work;
2. APPROVES
the participation at a cost of $5,000 by the City in “Registry
Week” to be conducted by RUAH Community Services in February 2016 with
the purpose of further investigating the numbers of people experiencing
homelessness or sleeping rough in this region; and
3. APPROVES
Administration to negotiate an appropriate contribution to the Shelter WA
report commissioned by City of Joondalup due to its relevance to City of
Wanneroo in informing a role in homelessness.
4.
Attachments: Nil
CD04-12/15 North
Coast Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group Terms of Reference
File Ref: 13465
– 15/549759
Responsible
Officer: Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: MN04-11/15
Agenda; MN04-11/15
Resolution
Request
to form a North Coast Community Reference and Sport User Group
Issue
To consider the draft Terms of Reference for the North Coast
Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group.
Background
At its meeting held on 10 November 2015, Council considered
report MN04-11/15, being a Request to form a North Coast Community Reference
and Sporting User Group. As a result, Council resolved the following:
“That Council AUTHORISES
the formation of a North Coast Community Reference and Sport User Group, to
advise Council of their short, medium and long term aspirations for their
sport, including the development of an appropriate Terms of Reference to
present for consideration at its Ordinary Council meeting in December 2015.”
This report considers the proposed Terms of Reference for
the North Coast Community Reference and Sporting User Group.
Detail
As a result of Council’s resolution, Administration
has developed draft Terms of Reference for the North Coast Community Reference
and Sporting User Group (the Group) (Attachment 1).
The purpose of the Group has been identified as follows:
“To act as a consultative
forum to advise on local sporting needs to assist in the implementation of the
North Coast Ward Active Reserve Master Plan outcomes, as endorsed by
Council.”
The aims and function of the Group are proposed as follows:
“1.1 Advise
Council of the short, medium and long terms aspirations for sport within the
North Coast Ward;
1.2 Provide
input in respect to the inclusion of new sporting facilities within the Ward in
the North Coast Active Reserve Master Plan;
1.3 Provide
input into local sporting needs and issues as it relates to the implementation
of the North Coast Ward Active Reserve Master Plan.”
The aims and functions seek to recognise that the Group will
have two main priorities. The first of these is to provide advice on the future
aspirations of sport within the Ward, while the second is to provide input in
regards to local sporting needs and issues.
The frequency of the meetings has been set at biannually.
This is on the basis that, given the role of the group is to primarily advise
on aspirations of sport within the ward, meeting twice a year is considered to
be sufficient.
Membership of the Working Group has been identified as
follows:
· Mayor;
· North
Coast Ward Councillors ;
· Manager
Community Facilities (non voting delegate);
· A
maximum of seven (7) community representatives from the North Coast Ward;
· A
maximum of seven (7) representatives from existing Sporting User Groups located
within the North Coast Ward.
Membership of the group has been structured in such a way to
achieve an equal representation of community members and representatives from
local sporting clubs, with the maximum numbers based on the same group for the
South Ward. Subject to Council approval of the draft terms of Reference, an
Expression of Interest (EOI) process will be undertaken early in the new year
for the seven community and Sporting User Groups representatives.
Should the number of EOIs received be within the number of
positions available, the Director Community and Place will approve the appointment
of the community and sporting user group representatives. Should the number of
EOIs exceed the positions available, a further report will be provided to
Council for consideration.
Consultation
Administration has sought advice from Councillor Winton, in
terms of the draft terms of reference.
Comment
Nil
Statutory
Compliance
Establishment of this reference group has been undertaken in
accordance with Part 5, Division 2 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risks registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Administration staffing costs will be met through the
existing operating budget. A budget of $10,000 has been made available in
PR-2928 to facilitate the implementation of the North Coast Ward Active Reserve
Master Plan outcomes.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the Terms of Reference for the North Coast Ward Community Reference and
Sporting User Group as detailed in Attachment 1;
2. APPOINTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Mayor and the North Coast Ward Councillors to the North
Coast Community Reference and Sporting User Group;
3. AUTHORISES
a maximum of seven (7) community representatives from the North Coast
Ward, and a maximum of seven (7) representatives from existing Sporting User
Groups located within the North Coast Ward; and
4. NOTES
an Expression of Interest will be conducted early in 2016 seeking
representation from community members and Sporting User Groups.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
North Coast Commuity Reference and Sporting User
Group Terms of Reference
|
15/549941
|
Minuted
|
CD05-12/15 Consideration
of a Proposed Pedalo Business at Brampton Park Butler
File Ref: 2442
– 15/549732
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider a request to conduct a pedalo/watercraft hire
business on the lakes at Brampton Park, Butler.
Background
A request was received by Administration from Mr Robert
Pitchford from Butler on 26 May 2015, seeking permission to operate hand or leg
propelled water craft (Pedalo Boats) hire business on the lakes at Brampton
Park. The proposal put forward by Mr Pitchford included the following key
points:
· Operation
of a maximum of 10 water craft during daylight hours on a seven day a week
basis;
· The
proponent to provide all required safety equipment and supervision;
· Crafts
will only be hired by adults and/or supervising adults with children; and
· When
not in use it is proposed that craft will be secured to a mooring in the centre
of the lake.
A location plan indicating the proposed lake on which the operation
would be based has been included in (Attachment 1), and a copy of the
initial proposal (comprising of an email) has been included within (Attachment
2).
Detail
In considering the proposal, Administration has considered
the following key issues:
Licensing Process
Brampton Park (including the lakes most appropriate for the
proposed pedalo business) is incorporated in Reserve 47695 and is Crown Land
managed by the City.
As the use of the land by Mr Pitchford would require a
degree of permanency (either exclusively for a period of time, or at agreed
hours of access), the City would need to formally lease or licence the relevant
land to him. Note that the form of land access and tenure (lease and/or
licence) would be influenced by the proponent’s business case, including
considerations such as the extent of on-land shelters used during operations
and the form of storage of the Pedalo Boats.
The current Management Order does not provide the power for
the City to licence or lease any part of Brampton Park. Before any
possible lease/licence could proceed, the City would first need to request that
the Minister for Lands amend the Management Order to permit leasing or
licensing.
The City has had initial discussion with the Department of
Lands which has confirmed the Department’s ‘in principle’
agreement to the change to the Management Order.
The City will still need to request that the Minister for
Lands formally amend the Management Order to permit the leasing or licensing of
Brampton Park. The formal process to amend the Management Order will take
is process would more than likely take approximately at least 1 month to
conclude, but may take some months longer due to the Department of Lands’
operational workload.
In addition to securing the addition of the power to licence
or lease condition to the Management Order the following process will also be
required to be undertaken (Attachment 3):
1. Council’s
“in principle” endorsement of the proposal, prior to advertising of
an Expression of Interest (EOI). It should be noted that this can be undertaken
in advance of steps 4 and 5, with implementation of the EOI being subject to
achieving the power to licence/lease, completion of the land valuation and
preparation of the draft Licence Agreement (as it will occur in parallel to the
amendment of the Management Order);
2. Advertise
the EOI locally (nominally for a period of 28 days) in order for any
alternative water craft businesses to apply for use of Brampton Park Lakes and
be assessed against all relevant criteria. The EOI will include the proponent
submitting a:
a. Business
Plan (including all relevant business details);
b. Risk
Management Plan accepting all risk associated with the business;
c. Public
Liability Insurance details;
d. Site
Plan identifying specific areas of use; and
e. Reserve
booking form.
3. Assessment
undertaken on EOI submissions received based on the above criteria.
4. Land
valuation to be undertaken by a licensed valuer to assess an appropriate
commercial licence fee or rental for the use of the identified portion of
Brampton Park for the proposed business. The proposed lease/licence would
be considered a “Commercial” arrangement under the City’s
Leasing Policy, meaning that lease/licence fees are to be determined by
negotiation with regard to the market value. The valuation would be on
instructions from the City but with costs recovered from the proponent.
It is estimated that this would take 3 weeks. This item could occur in
parallel to the EOI process if the existing proponent agrees to bear the
valuation costs.
5. Preparation
of a draft commercial Lease/Licence Agreement for the proposed business by
external Lawyers. This would be on instructions from the City but with
costs recovered from the proponent. It is envisaged that this would take
4 weeks. This item could be initiated in parallel to the EOI process if
the existing proponent agrees to bear the document preparation costs.
6. Council
report prepared seeking approval to advertise the City's intent to grant a
lease/licence to the successful proponent and inviting comment on the proposed
disposition. This requirement arises from section 3.58 of the Local
Government Act 1995 (WA), on the basis that the proponent will be a
commercial operator and will not attract an ‘exempt’
disposition. Should no submissions/comments be received as part of the
advertising process, the City will enter into the Lease/Licence Agreement with
the successful proponent. If submissions/comments are received, these
will be subject to assessment and a further report to Council to consider the
outcome of the assessment process.
The requirement that the proponent bears land
valuation and document preparation costs is standard practice in relation to
commercial lease/licences administered by the City.
It is also noted that further work may be occasioned as a
result of developments on the above items. For example, the Department of Lands
may require that the relevant leased/licensed portion of Brampton Park is
surveyed, and a licensed surveyor would need to complete this work (at the
proponent’s cost).
Insurance and Security
As part of the proponent’s application they will need
to provide evidence of Public Liability Insurance in a sum of not less the $20
million. A condition of the lease/licence granted will be that the proponent is
to accept all risk associated with the running of the business.
A security bond or bank guarantee is anticipated to be
required to further protect the City in the event of a risk eventuating.
The form of security will be determined by negotiation with regard to the
successful proponent’s EOI submission.
Local Laws
The following local laws are relevant to the consideration
of the proposal:
· Local
Government Act 1995 – Local Government & Public Property Local Law
1999 – Part 3 – General
Activities
requiring approval
13. A
person shall not on or from any local government property, without having first
obtained written approval from the local government to do so:
(h)
hire or use a building, reserve or other local government facility;
(k)
charge a person for entry to local government property.
Local
Government Act 1995 – Local Government & Public Property Local Law
1999 – Part 4 – Use of Local Government Property
Setting
aside of local government property
23.
(1) A local government may set aside any local government property, local
government building or reserve or portion of such for a specific use or uses
and may designate by signs that use and conditions of use, including but not
limited to any areas where:
(c)
boats, personal watercraft or surf boards, either generally or of a particular
class are permitted, restricted or prohibited.
Prohibited
activities
25. unless
indicated by a sign that any of the following activities are permissible on any
reserve or other local government property set aside for the purpose, a person
shall not:
(d)
launch a personal watercraft or boat.
· Local
Government Act 1995 – Trading in Public Places Local Law 1999 –
Part 5 – Street Trading
28. A
person shall not carry on trading in any street or public place
(a) Unless that person is the holder of a valid
and current street trading licence or assistance specified in the licence.
Environmental Health Considerations
As far as water quality is concerned, the City’s
Environmental Health Team would be required to undertake a regular, fortnightly
recreational water sampling regime which is conducted during the months of
November to April.
The proposed Pedalo business would be regarded as a
secondary contact risk activity with the water quality risks associated with
this activity being identified as follows:
· skin
contact from wading into the water,
· possible
accidental immersion etc.,
· stirring
up of water associated with the proposed Sun Dolphin Sun Slider operation, and;
aeration of water via fountains.
The City’s Health Technical Officer would carry out
the fortnightly monitoring for the following:
· Bacterial
indicators – Enterococci and E.Coli;
· Thermophilic
Amoebae when water temperature > 24 degrees Celsius; and
· Phytoplankton.
Should these tests indicate unacceptable levels then the
pedalo operations would require to be suspended until water conditions returned
to acceptable levels. This would be managed through conditions within the
lease/licence agreement, permitting the access to the land for testing purposes
and the suspension of activities on the lakes.
Infrastructure and Asset Management Considerations
The lakes within Brampton Park are provided for the storage
of irrigation water to the public open space throughout the Brighton
development. Whilst the lakes add to the aesthetic amenity of Brampton
Park, this is not their primary function and it was not originally envisaged
that they would be used for recreational boating activities (including
boating). However, the existing lake liner is considered suitable for these
activities to undertaken with the provision that the appropriate risk
mitigation strategies are implemented to accommodate this type of activity.
Administration investigated the issues in relation to
operational impacts of the proposal on the infrastructure currently in place
within the lakes and the need for additional protection for these assets. The
major concerns identified were in relation to the potential damage to the
existing lake liner, pumps and aerators. These are expensive
infrastructure and were provided by the developer of the subdivision in the
locality and are maintained in accordance with agreements with that developer.
As part of the overall Risk Assessment undertaken in
response to the receipt of the proposal (Attachment 4) the following key
risk mitigation treatments have been recommended for implementation by the
Proponent to their cost and to the City’s satisfaction:
|
Hazard
|
Proposed Control
Treatment
|
|
Exposure of lake liner to foot traffic and boat traffic
|
Install jetty/pontoon to ensure access point to boat is
always in adequate depth of water and/or restrict business hours through
licence agreement.
|
|
Damage to floating aerators, pumps and associated
electrical installations.
|
Installation of barriers to prevent contact, signage
advising to “keep clear” of Aerators.
|
The Risk Assessment was undertaken including relevant
officers from Community Facilities, Infrastructure and Fleet Maintenance, Parks
and Conservation Management, Strategic and Business Planning and Economic
Development. As a result of completing the Risk Assessment, it is the view of
Administration that the proposal can be accommodated on the lake at Brampton
Park on the basis that the above controls are put in place by the proponent, to
the satisfaction of the City. This will need to be comprehensively addressed
in the business case submitted by the proponent (or any other responder to the
EOI).
Consultation
The Manager Community Facilities
and Manager Economic Development have also been assisting the proponent in
progressing the proposal.
Comment
It should be noted that the proponent has met with the Mayor
to seek support for the proposal and has also sought the support of the
Minister of Tourism.
Statutory
Compliance
The proposed disposal to the successful EOI applicant will
need to comply with the requirements of Section 3.58 of the Local Government
Act 1995. This aspect will be addressed in the further report to
Council anticipated at paragraph 6 of the Detail section above.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
The risks associated with the proposal have been identified
within the Risk Assessment undertaken by Administration and which has been
provided in Attachment 4. Management of these risks will fall with the
proponent and be addressed through the required Business Plan, Risk Management
Plan and Public Liability information to be submitted under the EOI process.
Deficiencies in respect of any these items will be reviewed in the course of
Administration providing further recommendations to Council, and may require
further consideration by the appropriate City committee.
Further to the final comment in the Budget/Financial
Implications section below, there is a potential residual risk to the City
where the proponent incurs liability under the lease/licence and the security
provided by the proponent was inadequate.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The financial implications for the City in regards to this
proposal are limited to the cost of the City’s Health Technical Officer
undertaking fortnightly monitoring of water quality. This can be met by the
existing operating budget.
It is envisaged that the costs associated with the
development of the relevant legal documentation and implementation of the risk
mitigation treatments will be the responsibility of the proponent. These
include, but may not be limited to:-
· Land
Valuation;
· Site
Survey for application to Department of State Lands;
· Drafting
of Licence documentation;
· Provision
of Pontoon; and
· Protection
barriers for Aerators.
In the event that the proponent under the EOI process or in
subsequent negotiations does not agree to accept some or all of these costs,
this will be a consideration noted by Administration in any subsequent
recommendations to Council. At the time of the present report,
Administration recommends that establishment costs and risk mitigation are
borne by the operator of the pedalo business (as a commercial operation).
It should also be acknowledged that, where the proponent
incurred liability under the lease/licence and the security provided by the
proponent was inadequate (for example, if a catastrophic event, such as a death
occurred, but the proponent was insolvent and any bank guarantee was
insufficient to meet the liability amount), the City would face a potential
financial risk as having permitted the proponent’s use of the land.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. APPROVES
IN PRINCIPLE, the conduct of a Pedalo Boat (or similar) hire business on the
lakes at Brampton Park, Butler;
2. APPROVES
the undertaking of an Expression of Interest process for the operation of a
Pedalo Boat (or similar) hire business on the lakes at Brampton Park, Butler;
3. AUTHORISES
a request to the Department of Lands to amend the Management Order for Reserve
47695 to add the power to licence/lease the land from the Department of Lands;
and
4. NOTES
that the outcome of the Expression of Interest process, in particular in
respect to risk management considerations, will be subjected to the
City’s Risk Management Methodology and may, as applicable, be referred to
the City of Wanneroo's Audit and Risk Committee should Administration have
concerns regarding any deficiencies in the management of risk by the preferred
applicant.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Aerial - Brampton Park
|
15/533658
|
|
|
2.
|
Pedalo Submission
|
15/533669
|
|
|
3.
|
Brampton Park - Pedalo Business - Process Flowchart
|
15/523379
|
|
|
4.
|
Risk Assessment - Pedalo Business - Brampton Park
|
15/572856
|
|
Other Matters
CD06-12/15 Riverlinks
Sports Amenities Building and Carpark - Request for a portion of 2016/17 funds
to be brought forward into 2015/16.
File Ref: 20615
– 15/530197
Responsible
Officer: Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a budget re-allocation within the existing
budget for (PR-2961) Riverlinks Sports Amenities Building and Carpark project.
Background
Riverlinks Reserve is designated as an active reserve and is
located at 15 Riverlinks Drive in Clarkson (Attachment 1). The active
reserve includes 2 soccer pitches, floodlighting and a temporary toilet and
shower ablution block. The reserve is currently used by the Quinns Football
Club (soccer) and the Somerly Primary School during school hours.
The design and construction of the Riverlinks Sports
Amenities Building and Carpark (PR-2961) is listed in the 2015/16 Capital Works
Budget and forward Capital Works Budget as follows:
|
Year
|
Work Asset Item
|
Total Cost
|
Funding Source
|
|
Council (Muni)
|
Grants
|
Contribution
|
Reserve
|
Loan
|
|
2015/16
|
Design
|
41,000
|
41,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2016/17
|
Construction
|
1,486,000
|
1,486,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
1,527,000
|
1,527,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Detail
Project costs were initially allocated in 2013 and a recent
quantity surveyor report was undertaken by Owen Consulting (Attachment 2)
to ensure the budget’s accuracy. While the report showed that the project
is able to be delivered within the existing budget, the Consultant Fees
(design) were estimated to be $135,000. This represents a potential shortfall
of $94,000 for the design process in 2015/16. As a result, this report will
seek to reassign funds allocated in the 2016/17 forward capital works budget to
address the shortfall, whilst maintaining the overall project budget of
$1.527m.
Consultation
Community Consultation on the facility will commence as part
of the design stage and will, involve key stakeholders and residents. It is
expected that this will occur in around April 2016.
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy Implications
This request is in accordance with the City’s
Accounting Policy Section 3(g)(c) which states:
“Circumstances:
…the budget
allocation for a capital work project is insufficient
Action:
In accordance with Section 6.8
of the Local Government Act 1995 by way of a report and recommendation to the
Council seeking authorisation of the expenditures and to endorse the necessary
budget variation.”
Financial
Implications
A budget variation is required to reflect the transfer of
$94,000 from the 2016/17 forward capital works budget to 2015/16 Capital Works
Budget to provide sufficient budget to enable the completion of design in the
2015/16 financial year. This will occur as a part of the 2015/16 budget
mid-year review process.
As noted, the overall project budget will remain unchanged.
|
Year
|
Work Asset Item
|
Total Cost
|
Funding Source
|
|
Council (Muni)
|
Grants
|
Contribution
|
Reserve
|
Loan
|
|
2015/16
|
Design
|
135,000
|
135,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2016/17
|
Construction
|
1,392,000
|
1,392,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
1,527,000
|
1,527,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE
MAJORITY the over expenditure of $94,000 for PR-2961 Riverlinks Sports
Amenities Building in the 2015/16 financial year to enable completion of the
project design, in accordance with the City’s Accounting Policy Section
3(g)(c); and
2. NOTES
that the overall project budget for PR-2961 Riverlinks Sports Amenities
Building remains unchanged at $1,527,000.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Riverlinks Park - Site Plan
|
14/354788
|
|
|
2.
|
Riverlinks Sports Amenities Building and Carpark -
Updated Cost Estimate
|
15/528006
|
|
Corporate
Strategy & Performance
Finance
CS01-12/15 Warrant
of Payments for the Period to 30 November 2015
File Ref: 1859
– 15/568077
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the list of list of accounts paid for the month
of November, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the
end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list
of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary
Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts
and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of
accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the
minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in November
2015:
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid - November
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Manual Journals
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
104077 - 104459
2393 - 2422
|
$2,793,724.56
$11,467,018.95
$14,260,743.51
($5,073.25)
($1,251,868.71)
($1,375,906.34)
($11,627,895.21)
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2015
Recoup – Municipal Fund
Direct Payments
Payroll – Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$11,627,895.21
$24,353.26
$3,258,878.80
$14,911,127.27
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – November 2015
Cell 4
Cell 5
Cell 8
Cell Berkley
Cell 9
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$3,360.20
$3,819.59
$4,022.10
$206,764.45
$1,157,940.00
$1,375,906.34
|
At the close of November 2015 outstanding creditors amounted
to $441,393.70.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payments (cheques and electronic transfers) and
the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of November 2015
is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the
meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management)
Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the
accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end
and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after
each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the
prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the
month of November 2015, as summarised below:-
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid - November
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Manual Journals
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
104077 - 104459
2393 - 2422
|
$2,793,724.56
$11,467,018.95
$14,260,743.51
($5,073.25)
($1,251,868.71)
($1,375,906.34)
($11,627,895.21)
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – November 2015
Recoup – Municipal Fund
Direct Payments
Payroll – Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$11,627,895.21
$24,353.26
$3,258,878.80
$14,911,127.27
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – November 2015
Cell 4
Cell 5
Cell 8
Cell Berkley
Cell 9
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$3,360.20
$3,819.59
$4,022.10
$206,764.45
$1,157,940.00
$1,375,906.34
|
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS
NOVEMBER 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT
|
DATE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
AMOUNT
|
|
00104077
|
03/11/2015
|
R Leech
|
$6.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Self
Defence - Gold Program
|
|
|
00104078
|
03/11/2015
|
Quinns Rocks Cricket Club
|
$48.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund
|
|
|
00104079
|
03/11/2015
|
BGC Residential
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Payment
Not Required On Preliminary Advice
|
|
|
00104080
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$585.40
|
|
00104081
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,610.78
|
|
00104082
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,423.99
|
|
00104083
|
03/11/2015
|
P Traynor
|
$281.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104084
|
03/11/2015
|
A & N Mercer
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104085
|
03/11/2015
|
C J Shatford
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104086
|
03/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Secondary College
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104087
|
03/11/2015
|
Satterley Property Group Pty Ltd
|
$553,038.75
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104088
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,005.00
|
|
00104089
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104090
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104091
|
03/11/2015
|
Kristina Castillo
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104092
|
03/11/2015
|
Ankitkumar Patel
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104093
|
03/11/2015
|
Nagat Omer Tanger
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104094
|
03/11/2015
|
Rasagna Chethireddy
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104095
|
03/11/2015
|
Michelle Deboick
|
$810.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104096
|
03/11/2015
|
Leeanne De quintal
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104097
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104098
|
03/11/2015
|
Butler Football Club
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104099
|
03/11/2015
|
Somerly Primary School
|
$810.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104100
|
03/11/2015
|
Kiran Shah
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104101
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104102
|
03/11/2015
|
Brighton Seahawks Junior Football Club
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104103
|
03/11/2015
|
Circus Joseph Ashton
|
$3,890.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104104
|
03/11/2015
|
Karla O'Brien
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104105
|
03/11/2015
|
DM & JL Jackson
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104106
|
03/11/2015
|
Exotic Homes
|
$96.52
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No.14 To East Wanneroo Cell 1 Asp
No.3
|
|
|
00104107
|
03/11/2015
|
Johnson Property Group
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104108
|
03/11/2015
|
The Smith Family
|
$3,300.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding Program - Girradoola Community Christmas Celebration Event 06.12.2015
|
|
|
00104109
|
03/11/2015
|
Christian & Bernadette Nolte
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104110
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104111
|
03/11/2015
|
Pauline Robertson
|
$1,775.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104112
|
03/11/2015
|
Y Zhao
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104113
|
03/11/2015
|
M Dunnington & Kathleen Alloway
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104114
|
03/11/2015
|
D Emerson
|
$42.50
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00104115
|
03/11/2015
|
G Gintzburger
|
$38.75
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00104116
|
03/11/2015
|
D H & N J Bell
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104117
|
03/11/2015
|
J Joubert
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104118
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$431.03
|
|
00104119
|
03/11/2015
|
Barry Lloyd
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104120
|
03/11/2015
|
Samantha Fenn
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104121
|
03/11/2015
|
Sonet Coetzee
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104122
|
03/11/2015
|
John Ware
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104123
|
03/11/2015
|
John Agnew
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104124
|
03/11/2015
|
Natalie Sangalli
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104125
|
03/11/2015
|
Maryka Groenewald
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104126
|
03/11/2015
|
Rudi Steffens
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104127
|
03/11/2015
|
Lewis Flood
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104128
|
03/11/2015
|
Peter Hunter
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104129
|
03/11/2015
|
Lara Simpkins JP
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104130
|
03/11/2015
|
Stuart Mackenzie
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104131
|
03/11/2015
|
Clinton Durham
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104132
|
03/11/2015
|
Duncan Ridley
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104133
|
03/11/2015
|
Vincent Tran
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104134
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$315.22
|
|
00104135
|
03/11/2015
|
Travis Robinson
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104136
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$451.13
|
|
00104137
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$794.05
|
|
00104138
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$739.82
|
|
00104139
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$446.41
|
|
00104140
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$474.47
|
|
00104141
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$835.79
|
|
00104142
|
03/11/2015
|
L Smith
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Bees Removal From City Of Wanneroo Verge
|
|
|
00104143
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$873.46
|
|
00104144
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$337.48
|
|
00104145
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$729.64
|
|
00104146
|
03/11/2015
|
Cassandra Kemp
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104147
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$335.88
|
|
00104148
|
03/11/2015
|
Sam Attrill
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104149
|
03/11/2015
|
Katarzyna Johnson
|
$136.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Food
Premise Registration Fee - Withdrawn
|
|
|
00104150
|
03/11/2015
|
G8 Education Ltd
|
$266.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Food
Premise Application & Registration - Already Paid
|
|
|
00104151
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$61.56
|
|
00104152
|
03/11/2015
|
Anri De Jager
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00104153
|
03/11/2015
|
Mai Liu
|
$96.00
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104154
|
03/11/2015
|
Erin Munyard
|
$132.30
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Credits - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104155
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$907.49
|
|
00104156
|
03/11/2015
|
Kim Irvine
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104157
|
03/11/2015
|
Victoria McDermott
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00104158
|
03/11/2015
|
Delys Reid
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Lawn
Bowls - Gold Program
|
|
|
00104159
|
03/11/2015
|
Optus Billing Services
|
$113.50
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104160
|
03/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Playgroup Association Incorporated
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104161
|
03/11/2015
|
North Coast Rangers Christian Soccer Club
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104162
|
03/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$200.00
|
|
00104163
|
03/11/2015
|
Alinta Gas
|
$634.20
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
3 X Financial
Assistance $417.00
|
|
|
00104164
|
03/11/2015
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104165
|
03/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104166
|
03/11/2015
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$80.65
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104167
|
03/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$25.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104168
|
03/11/2015
|
Water Corporation
|
$11,943.43
|
|
|
|
Water Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
2 X Financial
Assistance $245.81
|
|
|
00104169
|
03/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104170
|
03/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104171
|
03/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104172
|
03/11/2015
|
Synergy
|
$70,442.35
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
7 X Financial
Assistance $1,738.30
|
|
|
00104173
|
03/11/2015
|
Telstra
|
$356.99
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges
For The City
|
|
|
00104174
|
03/11/2015
|
Funded Services Petty Cash
|
$152.30
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104175
|
03/11/2015
|
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore
|
$257.00
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix
Camera & 8GB Memory Card - IT
|
|
|
00104176
|
03/11/2015
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd
|
$376.29
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104177
|
03/11/2015
|
City of Mandurah
|
$22.00
|
|
|
|
Lost Book
Charges - Library Services
|
|
|
00104178
|
03/11/2015
|
Stephen McKee
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Remove Asbestos
- Hawkins Road - Waste
|
|
|
00104179
|
03/11/2015
|
Metro Hardware Pty Ltd
|
$39.90
|
|
|
|
5lt Petrol Jerry
Can - Parks
|
|
|
00104180
|
03/11/2015
|
New Water Ways Incorporated
|
$605.00
|
|
|
|
Workshop -
Vegetated Stormwater Systems 26 - 27.10.2015 M Meuwese & D Hempill - Land
Development
|
|
|
00104181
|
03/11/2015
|
Quickgrow Garden Centre & Landscaping Supplies
|
$2,944.00
|
|
|
|
Red Mulch -
Wanneroo Road Median - Parks
|
|
|
00104182
|
05/11/2015
|
My Nguyen
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
00104183
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$771.36
|
|
00104184
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$718.45
|
|
00104185
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$701.61
|
|
00104186
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$350.27
|
|
00104187
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$731.24
|
|
00104188
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$366.26
|
|
00104189
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$683.00
|
|
00104190
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$630.50
|
|
00104191
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$342.28
|
|
00104192
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$358.42
|
|
00104193
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$477.48
|
|
00104194
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$954.97
|
|
00104195
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$284.71
|
|
00104196
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$769.82
|
|
00104197
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$284.71
|
|
00104198
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$862.12
|
|
00104199
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$964.71
|
|
00104200
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$750.33
|
|
00104201
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$941.52
|
|
00104202
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$691.55
|
|
00104203
|
10/11/2015
|
Thi Dep Nguyen
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104204
|
10/11/2015
|
Travis Martion
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104205
|
10/11/2015
|
J. Leahy Warakurna RCS
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104206
|
10/11/2015
|
Penny Riley
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104207
|
10/11/2015
|
Steven Palmer
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104208
|
10/11/2015
|
Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka P/S
|
$133.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund
|
|
|
00104209
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$29,147.19
|
|
00104210
|
10/11/2015
|
Nando's Australia Pty Ltd
|
$526.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Food
Premise Annual Renewal Fees - Paid Twice
|
|
|
00104211
|
10/11/2015
|
Inga Cherie Peirce
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104212
|
10/11/2015
|
Tamara Harris
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104213
|
10/11/2015
|
Cara Johnson
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104214
|
10/11/2015
|
Mr Tommi M Aho
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104215
|
10/11/2015
|
Rakesh Hirani
|
$810.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104216
|
10/11/2015
|
Dat Ho
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104217
|
10/11/2015
|
Dushyant Kalaria
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104218
|
10/11/2015
|
Michelle K Page
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104219
|
10/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Playgroup
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104220
|
10/11/2015
|
Alissa Leuzzi
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104221
|
10/11/2015
|
Mrs Wafa Hanna
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104222
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$424.80
|
|
00104223
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,526.99
|
|
00104224
|
10/11/2015
|
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club Incorporated
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104225
|
10/11/2015
|
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club Incorporated
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104226
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$6,282.41
|
|
00104227
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$6,169.32
|
|
00104228
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$585.40
|
|
00104229
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,084.51
|
|
00104230
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$585.40
|
|
00104231
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$371.45
|
|
00104232
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$582.93
|
|
00104233
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$582.97
|
|
00104234
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$528.83
|
|
00104235
|
10/11/2015
|
Football West
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1
X Member - National Youth Championships Coffs Harbour NSW 26.09.2015
|
|
|
00104236
|
10/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship 1 X
Member - U17 National Cricket Championship Brisbane QLD 28.09.2015 -
08.10.2015
|
|
|
00104237
|
10/11/2015
|
Amanda Franceschi
|
$129.36
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Swimming Lessons Term 2 2015
|
|
|
00104238
|
10/11/2015
|
V & O Ludford
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104239
|
10/11/2015
|
Yanchep United FC - Juniors
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104240
|
10/11/2015
|
Yanchep United FC
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104241
|
10/11/2015
|
Merriwa Pharmacy
|
$18.30
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104242
|
10/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$44.77
|
|
00104243
|
10/11/2015
|
Roberts Day Group
|
$933.20
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No. 3 To The South Alkimos Agreed
Structure Plan No. 72
|
|
|
00104244
|
10/11/2015
|
Roberts Day Group
|
$415.03
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No. 1 To The South Alkimos Agreed
Structure Plan No. 72
|
|
|
00104245
|
10/11/2015
|
Georgiou Group
|
$315.08
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Building Applications - Not Required
|
|
|
00104246
|
10/11/2015
|
Fines Enforcement Registry
|
$1,612.00
|
|
|
|
Lodgement Of 31
Infringement Notices Records With The Fines Enforcement Registry - Regulatory
Services
|
|
|
00104247
|
10/11/2015
|
Engine Trading Pty Ltd
|
$440.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned
Vehicles - Ranger Services
|
|
|
00104248
|
10/11/2015
|
New Water Ways Incorporated
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Training -
Vegetated Stormwater Systems 26 - 27.10.2015 - J Trimmer
|
|
|
00104249
|
10/11/2015
|
Swan Valley Egg Farm
|
$35.20
|
|
|
|
Eggs For Health
Department Testing - Health Services
|
|
|
00104250
|
10/11/2015
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance -
Purchasing Lunches For HACC Clients 09.11.2015 - 30.11.2015
|
|
|
00104251
|
10/11/2015
|
Alinta Gas
|
$515.67
|
|
|
|
4 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104252
|
10/11/2015
|
Building & Construction Industry
|
$164,795.85
|
|
|
|
Collection Levy
Payment 01 - 31 October 2015
|
|
|
00104253
|
10/11/2015
|
Facility Officer WLCC Petty Cash
|
$39.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104254
|
10/11/2015
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$129.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104255
|
10/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$42.70
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104256
|
10/11/2015
|
Water Corporation
|
$33.49
|
|
|
|
Water Charges
For The City
|
|
|
00104257
|
10/11/2015
|
Yanchep Two Rocks Library Petty Cash
|
$69.15
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104258
|
10/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104259
|
10/11/2015
|
Synergy
|
$88,936.22
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 X Financial
Assistance $733.32
|
|
|
00104260
|
10/11/2015
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$145.15
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104261
|
10/11/2015
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$609.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104262
|
10/11/2015
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & Yearly ICT Allowance
|
|
|
00104263
|
10/11/2015
|
Cr D M Newton
|
$5,991.67
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & Yearly ICT Allowance
|
|
|
00104264
|
11/11/2015
|
Riverside Developments
|
$795,655.00
|
|
|
|
Finalisation -
Cell 9 Contribution Arrangements Riverside Developments Amendment 102 And
Associated Cost Sharing Arrangement Adopted At Council Meeting 13.10.2015
|
|
|
00104265
|
11/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$641.52
|
|
00104266
|
12/11/2015
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$2,300.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance -
Gift Vouchers For Reward & Recognition 10 X $20 For 4 Directorates = $800
And 30 X $50 For Years Of Service = $1500 - HR
|
|
|
00104267
|
13/11/2015
|
Accounts Services Petty Cash
|
$713.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104268
|
17/11/2015
|
David Williams & Susan Hurley
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104269
|
17/11/2015
|
Han Hu
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104270
|
17/11/2015
|
Nitesh Varsani
|
$345.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104271
|
17/11/2015
|
D Parin
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Lawn
Bowls - Gold Program
|
|
|
00104272
|
17/11/2015
|
Justin Hey & Emily Beckett
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104273
|
17/11/2015
|
O & S Mucibabic
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104274
|
17/11/2015
|
K Patani
|
$19.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Copy Of
Plan - Not Required
|
|
|
00104275
|
17/11/2015
|
K Christoffelsz
|
$19.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Floor
Plan - Not Available
|
|
|
00104276
|
17/11/2015
|
J Zamanzadeh
|
$19.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Site
Plan - Unavailable
|
|
|
00104277
|
17/11/2015
|
B1 Homes
|
$1,250.73
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Building Application - Overpayment
|
|
|
00104278
|
17/11/2015
|
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
|
Community Funding
Program - Carols In The Park At Charnwood Reserve Two Rocks On 19.12.2015
|
|
|
00104279
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$722.32
|
|
00104280
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$720.72
|
|
00104281
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$654.63
|
|
00104282
|
17/11/2015
|
Veta Holmes
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104283
|
17/11/2015
|
E K & G M Monks
|
$810.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104284
|
17/11/2015
|
Mark Edwards
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104285
|
17/11/2015
|
Louise Jackson
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104286
|
17/11/2015
|
Aguak Akot
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104287
|
17/11/2015
|
Mrs Elizabeth Gooch
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104288
|
17/11/2015
|
Selvarajah Marimuthu
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104289
|
17/11/2015
|
L Rijks
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00104290
|
17/11/2015
|
Hasham Al-Musawi
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104291
|
17/11/2015
|
K O'Brien
|
$474.40
|
|
|
|
80% Of Art Works
Sold In Awesome Owl, Quirky Bird Exhibition Held In The Conference Room 14 -
27.10.2015
|
|
|
00104292
|
17/11/2015
|
J & B Dunham
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104293
|
17/11/2015
|
R Edwards
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Sale Of
Consignment Items - Heritage, Museum And Arts
|
|
|
00104294
|
17/11/2015
|
C & C De Silva
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104295
|
17/11/2015
|
Maltronics
|
$14.00
|
|
|
|
Sale Of
Consignment Items - Heritage, Museum And Arts
|
|
|
00104296
|
17/11/2015
|
S Hoy
|
$10.40
|
|
|
|
Sale Of
Consignment Items - Heritage, Museum And Arts
|
|
|
00104297
|
17/11/2015
|
Zig Zag Road
|
$19.20
|
|
|
|
Sale Of
Consignment Items - Heritage, Museum And Arts
|
|
|
00104298
|
17/11/2015
|
J Wailes
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Bus
Tour - Hidden Treasures - 21.10.2015
|
|
|
00104299
|
17/11/2015
|
R Lammers
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Bus
Tour - Hidden Treasures - 21.10.2015
|
|
|
00104300
|
17/11/2015
|
4X4 Extras
|
$258.50
|
|
|
|
Partial Refund
Site Fee - Unsuccessful Trade From Expo - Cultural Events
|
|
|
00104301
|
17/11/2015
|
Zoe Jones
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104302
|
17/11/2015
|
Lisa L Malynn
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104303
|
17/11/2015
|
Maria Bowers
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104304
|
17/11/2015
|
E & N Pemberton
|
$65.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Direct
Debit Membership Payment - Incorrectly Taken
|
|
|
00104305
|
17/11/2015
|
E Sheriff
|
$124.80
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104306
|
17/11/2015
|
Mitze Farrell
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00104307
|
17/11/2015
|
T Manuphan
|
$72.00
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104308
|
17/11/2015
|
Tracey Pengelly
|
$50.68
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00104309
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$558.50
|
|
00104310
|
17/11/2015
|
Thomas Clark
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Duplicate Payment
|
|
|
00104311
|
17/11/2015
|
J & J Hill
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104312
|
17/11/2015
|
Automark
|
$446.00
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104313
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$105.54
|
|
00104314
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$643.14
|
|
00104315
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$14.28
|
|
00104316
|
17/11/2015
|
R Funes
|
$59.04
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00104317
|
17/11/2015
|
Hocking Hill Pty Ltd
|
$312.53
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No. 33 To The East Wanneroo Cell 4
Agreed Structure Plan No. 6
|
|
|
00104318
|
17/11/2015
|
Fernhill Land Pty Ltd
|
$242.47
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of The Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No. 34 To The East Wanneroo Cell
4 Agreed Structure Plan No. 6
|
|
|
00104319
|
17/11/2015
|
Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Donation Towards
Assisting With The Cost Of Running The Butler Falcons CaLD Female AFL Team
Showcase Night 13.11.2015
|
|
|
00104320
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$726.44
|
|
00104321
|
17/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104322
|
17/11/2015
|
SSB Pty Ltd T/As Dreamstart Homes
|
$1,048.68
|
|
|
|
Refund -
Building Application - Not Required
|
|
|
00104323
|
17/11/2015
|
I Madeo
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Payment
For 3rd Dog - Cannot Be Processed Until Application Is Approved
|
|
|
00104324
|
17/11/2015
|
Yinan Xiao
|
$272.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Food
Premises Application And Registration Fee - Paid Twice
|
|
|
00104325
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$588.00
|
|
00104326
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$500.00
|
|
00104327
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$692.66
|
|
00104328
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$403.61
|
|
00104329
|
17/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,150.46
|
|
00104330
|
17/11/2015
|
Tamala Park Regional Council
|
$199.87
|
|
|
|
Refund - Portion
Of The Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No.3 To The Tamala Park Agreed
Structure Plan No.79
|
|
|
00104331
|
17/11/2015
|
Dale Alcock Homes
|
$620.91
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Development Application Fees - Not Required
|
|
|
00104332
|
17/11/2015
|
Judith Nicholas
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104333
|
17/11/2015
|
Natalie Kos
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104334
|
17/11/2015
|
J & M Grewal
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104335
|
17/11/2015
|
S Dutt
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Freedom
Of Information Application Fee - Application Withdrawn
|
|
|
00104336
|
17/11/2015
|
D Walls
|
$222.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Development Application Fees - Not Required
|
|
|
00104337
|
17/11/2015
|
B Robinson
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Lawn
Bowls - Gold Program
|
|
|
00104338
|
17/11/2015
|
Vodafone Pty Ltd
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104339
|
17/11/2015
|
Department of Housing
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104340
|
17/11/2015
|
Stephanie Anne Boyle
|
$69.60
|
|
|
|
Sale Of
Consignment Items - Heritage, Museum And Arts
|
|
|
00104341
|
17/11/2015
|
Independence Australia Accounts
|
$284.80
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104342
|
17/11/2015
|
BS & GS Cunningham
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104343
|
17/11/2015
|
Anne Pitos
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104344
|
17/11/2015
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$570.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance -
Purchasing Of Pantry Items For Seniors For Period 16.11.2015 - 15.12.2015
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance -
Food For Clients Christmas Party 30.11.2015 - Funded Services
|
|
|
00104345
|
17/11/2015
|
Alinta Gas
|
$12,637.60
|
|
|
|
2 X Financial
Assistance $466.90
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
00104346
|
17/11/2015
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$175.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104347
|
17/11/2015
|
Honeywell Secondhand Shop
|
$225.00
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00104348
|
17/11/2015
|
Mr Evan Martin
|
$479.50
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
|
|
|
00104349
|
17/11/2015
|
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash
|
$259.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104350
|
17/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$66.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104351
|
17/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$184.38
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104352
|
17/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104353
|
17/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104354
|
17/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104355
|
17/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104356
|
17/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$99.30
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104357
|
17/11/2015
|
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash
|
$255.65
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104358
|
17/11/2015
|
Ms Christine McGee
|
$216.50
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00104359
|
17/11/2015
|
Alexander Heights Day Centre Room Two
|
$111.15
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104360
|
17/11/2015
|
Water Corporation
|
$9,756.17
|
|
|
|
Water Charges
For The City
|
|
|
00104361
|
17/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104362
|
17/11/2015
|
Synergy
|
$515,645.20
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Streetlights
25.09 2015 - 24.10.2015 $482,819.06
|
|
|
|
|
6 X Financial
Assistance $1,752.85
|
|
|
00104363
|
17/11/2015
|
Mrs Jennifer Martin
|
$241.14
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
00104364
|
17/11/2015
|
Bubbles of Joy
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Ball Art -
Yanchep Children's Story Tree Launch - Libraries
|
|
|
00104365
|
17/11/2015
|
Sensis Pty Ltd
|
$137.51
|
|
|
|
L1 Business
Network Summary Product Golf Courses Public - Property
|
|
|
00104366
|
19/11/2015
|
Focus Settlements Trust Account
|
$227,440.87
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Of
Land - Lot 29 (6) McNamara Road Marangaroo
|
|
|
00104367
|
24/11/2015
|
1800 Move It
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
Removal Of
Chairs - Enterprise House - Economic Development
|
|
|
00104368
|
24/11/2015
|
1st Class Car Detailing
|
$242.00
|
|
|
|
Car Detailing -
Fleet
|
|
|
00104369
|
24/11/2015
|
Child Education Services
|
$1,800.65
|
|
|
|
Bookstock For
Clarkson - Library Services
|
|
|
00104370
|
24/11/2015
|
Creating Communities Australia Pty Ltd
|
$10,084.25
|
|
|
|
Needs &
Feasibility Study - Yanchep Community - Facilities
|
|
|
00104371
|
24/11/2015
|
Flight Centre Limited
|
$5,000.00
|
|
|
|
Travel Gift
Voucher - Race In Your Rates Prize - Communications & Events
|
|
|
00104372
|
24/11/2015
|
Thasa Hendricks
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Musical
Performance At Wanneroo Presents - Events
|
|
|
00104373
|
24/11/2015
|
Jumping Jitterbugs
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Sport And Dance
Classes - Butler Playgroup - Community Links
|
|
|
00104374
|
24/11/2015
|
Kingsway Veterinary Centre
|
$675.00
|
|
|
|
Microchips X 45
For Lifestyle Expo - Communication & Events
|
|
|
00104375
|
24/11/2015
|
Mr Michael Krysyna
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
Firewood For
Buckingham House - Heritage & Museums
|
|
|
00104376
|
24/11/2015
|
Quickgrow Garden Centre & Landscaping
|
$774.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Landscape Supplies - Parks
|
|
|
00104377
|
24/11/2015
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd
|
$312.00
|
|
|
|
Call Out Service
- WN 33221 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Call Out Service
- WN 33365 - Land Management
|
|
|
00104378
|
24/11/2015
|
Rudolf Schmidt
|
$125.00
|
|
|
|
Workshop
Facilitator - Crafternoon Tea X 2.5 Hours - Community Links
|
|
|
00104379
|
24/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104380
|
24/11/2015
|
Stephen McKee
|
$7,060.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Works -
Various Locations - Waste
|
|
|
00104381
|
24/11/2015
|
The Morley Veterinary Hospital
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Canine Adventure
Course - Living & Leisure Expo - Communication & Events
|
|
|
00104382
|
24/11/2015
|
The Trustee for K M Productions Trust
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Artist -
Lifestyle Expo - Communication And Events
|
|
|
00104383
|
24/11/2015
|
West Coast Spring Water Pty Ltd
|
$1,008.00
|
|
|
|
2 X Pallet Of
Water - Wanneroo Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade - Emergency Services
|
|
|
00104384
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,000.00
|
|
00104385
|
24/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104386
|
24/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104387
|
24/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104388
|
24/11/2015
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00104389
|
24/11/2015
|
Autism Association of WA
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Room
Booking Fee
|
|
|
00104390
|
24/11/2015
|
True North Church
|
$3,300.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding Program - Community Christmas Celebration Event - Somerly Carols By
Candlelight 13.12.2015
|
|
|
00104391
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$664.76
|
|
00104392
|
24/11/2015
|
SSB Pty Ltd T/As Dreamstart Homes
|
$1,048.68
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Building Application Fees - Encoded As New Application In Error
|
|
|
00104393
|
24/11/2015
|
Abel Roofing
|
$147.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Development Application Fees - Not Required
|
|
|
00104394
|
24/11/2015
|
Dale Alcock Homes
|
$1,289.38
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Building Application Fees - Charitable Foundation Homes - Fees Donated By The
City
|
|
|
00104395
|
24/11/2015
|
Abel Roofing
|
$147.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Development Application Fees - Not Required
|
|
|
00104396
|
24/11/2015
|
PEET Alkimos
|
$143.35
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Partial - Building Application Fees - Refund Difference
|
|
|
00104397
|
24/11/2015
|
Jenna Ardagh
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104398
|
24/11/2015
|
James Cook
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104399
|
24/11/2015
|
Jaryd Ireland
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104400
|
24/11/2015
|
Clubhouse Football - Premier Soccer
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Facility Hire -
Belhaven Oval
|
|
|
00104401
|
24/11/2015
|
Landsdale Gardens Playgroup
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104402
|
24/11/2015
|
Jessica Dabasia
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104403
|
24/11/2015
|
Rakesh Hirani
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104404
|
24/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Civic Choir Incorporated
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104405
|
24/11/2015
|
Vishal Patel
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104406
|
24/11/2015
|
Chandrakant Shah
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104407
|
24/11/2015
|
Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104408
|
24/11/2015
|
Mariana Aloe
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104409
|
24/11/2015
|
Marina Pose-Gracia
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104410
|
24/11/2015
|
Velinda Gae Montgomery
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104411
|
24/11/2015
|
Bianca Roe
|
$535.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104412
|
24/11/2015
|
Street Hassle Events
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104413
|
24/11/2015
|
Angy Iskander
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104414
|
24/11/2015
|
Ambat Radhika Menon
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104415
|
24/11/2015
|
Pushpak Jose
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104416
|
24/11/2015
|
Carramar Primary School P & C
|
$810.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104417
|
24/11/2015
|
Meryl Armstrong
|
$830.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104418
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$359.01
|
|
00104419
|
24/11/2015
|
Kingsway Junior Football Club
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104420
|
24/11/2015
|
Kingsway Junior Football Club
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104421
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$683.00
|
|
00104422
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,404.79
|
|
00104423
|
24/11/2015
|
Jakob Davidson
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104424
|
24/11/2015
|
Kathy Bullock Carramar Primary School
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104425
|
24/11/2015
|
Venetians Netball Club
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Donation - Court
And Room Bookings - Margaret Witney Cup Netball Rally Fundraiser For Ovarian
Cancer 18.10.2015
|
|
|
00104426
|
24/11/2015
|
Peter Moyes Madagascar Expedition 2
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 11
X Members - Peter Moyes Madagascar Expedition 3 - 16.07.2016
|
|
|
00104427
|
24/11/2015
|
Ice Hockey Australia
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1
X Member - 2016 IIHF Ice Hockey U20 World Championship Division II Group B,
Novi Sad Serbia 17 - 23.01.2016
|
|
|
00104428
|
24/11/2015
|
Westpoint City Church
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund
|
|
|
00104429
|
24/11/2015
|
YouthCARE
|
$38,695.00
|
|
|
|
Donation -
Proceeds From 2015 Charity Golf Day
|
|
|
00104430
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$416.76
|
|
00104431
|
24/11/2015
|
Liz Curry
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104432
|
24/11/2015
|
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club Incorporated
|
$64.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00104433
|
24/11/2015
|
Venus Nails
|
$295.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Development Application Fees - Not Required
|
|
|
00104434
|
24/11/2015
|
Dwane Michael
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104435
|
24/11/2015
|
PC & RS Bismark
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104436
|
24/11/2015
|
Susan Allen
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104437
|
24/11/2015
|
Paul Leesing
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104438
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,129.56
|
|
00104439
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$931.24
|
|
00104440
|
24/11/2015
|
Rates Refund
|
$4,800.00
|
|
00104441
|
24/11/2015
|
Thivya Rajagopal
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00104442
|
24/11/2015
|
Margaret Anne Funk
|
$21.25
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00104443
|
24/11/2015
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance -
January School Holiday Program - Youth Services
|
|
|
00104444
|
24/11/2015
|
Alexander Heights Day Centre Room One
|
$237.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104445
|
24/11/2015
|
Alinta Gas
|
$311.65
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
00104446
|
24/11/2015
|
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash
|
$227.43
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104447
|
24/11/2015
|
Cr F Cvitan
|
$1,507.56
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Corporate Apparel 2015 / 2016 Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
29.06.2015 - 11.11.2015
|
|
|
00104448
|
24/11/2015
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$68.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104449
|
24/11/2015
|
Jaguars Softball Club Incorporated
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport X 1
Child
|
|
|
00104450
|
24/11/2015
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$112.70
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104451
|
24/11/2015
|
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash
|
$193.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104452
|
24/11/2015
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$34.60
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00104454
|
24/11/2015
|
Water Corporation
|
$22,969.23
|
|
|
|
Water Charges
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 X Financial
Assistance $753.00
|
|
|
00104455
|
24/11/2015
|
Remittance Advice
|
|
|
00104456
|
24/11/2015
|
Synergy
|
$11,374.78
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
3 X Financial
Assistance $1,628.40
|
|
|
00104457
|
24/11/2015
|
Telstra
|
$27,716.50
|
|
|
|
Internet/Phone
Charges For The City
|
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial
Assistance $103.66
|
|
|
00104458
|
24/11/2015
|
Mrs Jennifer Martin
|
$180.90
|
|
|
|
Keyholder &
Tennis Court Booking Officer
|
|
|
00104459
|
24/11/2015
|
Ms Jodie Walter
|
$246.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - Cheques
|
$2,793,724.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS
TRANSFER
|
|
00002393
|
02/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA)
|
$65,689.58
|
|
|
|
Streetscape
Maintenance - Arterial Road - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002394
|
03/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clicksuper Pty Ltd
|
$629,734.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002395
|
03/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butler Netball Club Incorporated
|
$230.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Little Athletics Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby
|
$160.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit x 2
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$502.85
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Kinross Cricket Club
|
$383.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 3 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate
|
$8,338.79
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental
Valuations Chargeable - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Planners Association
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Registration -
Hot Topics Breakfast 17.09.2015 - P Bracone, J Naidoo, C Anderson
|
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Alan McColl
|
$494.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Expenses Related To Conference Attendance Brisbane
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Gareth Deeg
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Chief Bush Fire
Control Officer Mobile Phone Screen Repair
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Gregory Kent
|
$495.35
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Items Bought For Charity Golf Day Event
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Neil Scanes
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Glasses Claim - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Norman Hewer
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Robert Smithson
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Thi Nguyet-Anh Truong
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of
Candidate Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Basketball Club Incorporated
|
$1,345.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport
Vouchers X 12 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rocks Junior Cricket Club
|
$485.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 3 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Aust WA Division Incorporated
|
$176.00
|
|
|
|
Registration -
Hot Topics Breakfast Pathway To The Strategic Assessment 2 X Members
21.10.2015 - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Golf Club Incorporated
|
$204.30
|
|
|
|
Kidsport
Vouchers X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Westside Steelers
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002396
|
03/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 Apiaries
|
$160.00
|
|
|
|
Remove Hive -
Susan Park - Conservation Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Air Communications
|
$18,122.50
|
|
|
|
Annual
Maintenance Renewal - Admin (Civic Centre) To High Road - Licensed Link
01.09.2015 - 31.08.2016 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Altus Planning & Appeals
|
$3,135.00
|
|
|
|
Expert Planning
Consultant - Captiva Approach - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Ape Springs & Suspensions
|
$658.00
|
|
|
|
Repair
Suspension - WN 3350 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority
|
$1,408.00
|
|
|
|
Apparatus
Licence Renewal Fees - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$2,380.00
|
|
|
|
Training -
Business Writing Skills 15.10.2015 14 X Staff - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz
|
$24.75
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$1,129.04
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
BG & E Pty Ltd
|
$6,333.25
|
|
|
|
Consulting
Engineering Services - Lot 6 Compensation Claim - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop Pty Ltd
|
$668.70
|
|
|
|
Book Stock For
Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Cat Welfare Society Incorporated
|
$875.00
|
|
|
|
Daily Impound
Fees July 2015 - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway
|
$39,399.12
|
|
|
|
Rear Loader
& Operator & Skid Steer Loader - Bulk Verge Collections - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas
|
$667.06
|
|
|
|
Plumbing
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$6,173.15
|
|
|
|
Replace Footpath
- Hartman Drive - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd
|
$14,957.36
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Dunbar Services (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$35.75
|
|
|
|
Filter Exchange
X 5 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Frogmat Environmental (Australia) P Ltd
|
$9,540.00
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 5
- Development Of Curtis Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 6
- Development Of Cheltondale Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services
|
$1,750.69
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd
|
$5,496.50
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps
|
$7,535.00
|
|
|
|
Service
Irrigation Pump And Jetting Of Bore - Richard Aldersea Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd
|
$8,140.82
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing
|
$3,061.77
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA
|
$1,430.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Road
Pavements 28.10.2015 M Oh, Z Khama - Asset Management
|
|
|
|
|
JBA Surveys
|
$2,052.60
|
|
|
|
Landgate Search
& Field Survey Lot 9943 / 310 Flynn Drive Neerabup - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions
|
$17.66
|
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading
|
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
$32,619.10
|
|
|
|
Dry Park
Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd
|
$10,440.95
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$4,488.00
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment
Hire For The City
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors
|
$6,540.23
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$77,967.48
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$1,854.60
|
|
|
|
Coastal
Engineering Advice For The Scope Of Works For Physical Modelling Of The
Mindarie Marina Breakwaters - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists
|
$24.00
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting
|
$896.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of
Quinns Beach 25.09.2015 - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$888.00
|
|
|
|
Epson Workforce
Printers X 4 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
12 Month
Subscription MS Office 365 - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries
|
$135.30
|
|
|
|
Recycling Bin
Collection & Exchange - Information Management
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Motors of Wanneroo
|
$123.72
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Inspect Gates -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce
|
$11,165.22
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
R.G. Pember Pty Ltd
|
$27,692.50
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Services - Lot 6 Gnangara Road Corner Sydney Road Wangara - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Publishers Pty Ltd
|
$872.30
|
|
|
|
Advertising - WA
Senior - September 2015 - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$280,963.21
|
|
|
|
Road Resurfacing
- Various Locations - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd
|
$1,344.72
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Basic
Emergency Life Support - R Nsubuga - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo
|
$354.00
|
|
|
|
Catering -
Training 15.08.2015 & 17.08.2015 - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for The Entertainment B Trust
|
$3,845.60
|
|
|
|
Terracotta
Potter Workshop X 300 Children - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Face Painters X
3 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd
|
$1,536.20
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association
|
$2,621.00
|
|
|
|
Training -
Sustainability Workshop L Sarich 26.10.2015 - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Training -
Procurement Training For Local Government C Power - Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Training - Local
Government Act - Advanced 06 - 07.08.2015 M Wong - Legal
|
|
|
|
|
Training - Roman
II Work Selection Workshop - Asset Management
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated
|
$90.00
|
|
|
|
Business
Breakfast Meeting - Alanda Caffe For Cr Anh Truong & Cr Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade
|
$29.00
|
|
|
|
Phone Charger -
Wanneroo Central Brigade Phone - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$3,965.50
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002397
|
03/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Watershed Water Systems
|
$75,472.66
|
|
|
|
Reticulation
Items - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002398
|
04/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd
|
$191,334.00
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 3 - New Civic Centre Extension - Architectural Consultancy -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Ertech Pty Ltd
|
$18,848.73
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 4 - Wangara Retaining Walls - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
MKDC
|
$13,200.00
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 2 - New Civic Centre Extension - Spatial Design Consultancy -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio
|
$17,485.60
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 1 - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre Architectural Consultancy -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002399
|
09/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank
|
|
|
|
|
FlexipurchaseTransactions For August 2015 $12,430.91 - Breakdown On Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002400
|
10/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRB Transport Research Ltd
|
$1,298.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Basic
Geometric Road Design Workshop 12 - 13.04.2016 M Barua - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd
|
$346.30
|
|
|
|
Fuel System
Repairs - WN 33788 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited
|
$2,931.01
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$755.35
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Toilet -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police
|
$236.80
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Police
Checks - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Environment Regulations
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Registration Fee
- 2015 Waste Infinity Awards 3 Attendees - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$7,175.99
|
|
|
|
Paving Works -
Various Locations - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd
|
$572.00
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher
|
$2,906.60
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services
|
$690.98
|
|
|
|
Investigate
& Repair Fault - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs To PA
System - Clarkson Library - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Investigate
Alarm & Reset Panel - WLCC - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Ezyjuke Jukebox Hire
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Jukebox Hire -
Halloween Disco 29.10.2015 - The Heights Community House
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services
|
$642.40
|
|
|
|
Location Of
Stormwater Cells Hardcastle Parade - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd
|
$629.64
|
|
|
|
Gloves For
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd
|
$7,196.65
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing
|
$5,282.81
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd
|
$443.84
|
|
|
|
Chemicals For
Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo)
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia
|
$175.00
|
|
|
|
Membership 2015
/ 2016 - Shane Spinks
|
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd
|
$13,199.42
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$3,758.70
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment
Hire For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$192,691.60
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
- Domestic - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited
|
$352.77
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Maintenance Fees - Colourwave Printer - July 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$60,258.46
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$189.03
|
|
|
|
Blank Note Book
- Travelling Sketchbooks Exhibition - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Peerless Jal Pty Ltd
|
$22.94
|
|
|
|
Hand Cleaner -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce
|
$8,364.05
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Sign A Rama
|
$1,224.69
|
|
|
|
Museum Visirite
Frame - Heritage & Museums
|
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia
|
$2,169.10
|
|
|
|
Training - First
Aid X 10 - OSH
|
|
|
|
|
First Aid Kit -
OSH
|
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council
|
$16,689.82
|
|
|
|
GST Payable For
September 2015 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia
|
$70.40
|
|
|
|
Bronze Medallion
Renewal X 3- Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Toms Towbars
|
$270.00
|
|
|
|
Towbar Swapover
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd
|
$3,936.55
|
|
|
|
Traffic
Management Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd
|
$68.32
|
|
|
|
Fuel Cards -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$759.00
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Business Card - Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Stickers - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00002401
|
10/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$710.35
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002402
|
10/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Martial Arts Pty Ltd
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post
|
$5,219.93
|
|
|
|
Billpay
Transactions - Rates
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$283.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$827.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$495,596.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Building Commission
|
$144,553.98
|
|
|
|
Collection
Agency Fee Payments 01.10.2015 - 31.10.2015 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$687.31
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$5,788.22
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$840.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
CLJ Taekwondo (Joondalup) Pty Ltd
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken
|
$175.75
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Travel Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$8,870.30
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Charity Golf Day - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$956.35
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd
|
$33,336.17
|
|
|
|
Insurance -
Motor Vehicle - 30.06.2014 - 30.06.2015
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Little Athletics Club
|
$2,177.09
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 13 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate
|
$7,480.00
|
|
|
|
Slip Annual
Subscription Charge 01.11.2015 - 31.10.2016 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Unimproved
Valuations Chargeable - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,019.28
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Planners Association
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Seminar - Hot
Topics 19.11.2015 - J Thompson, A Harford, R Murad - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Julianne Mackay
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Metal Trunk -
Museum In A Box 25.10.2015 - Heritage & Museums
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Maria Cooke
|
$7,500.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Removal Costs - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Thi Nguyet-Anh Truong
|
$78.96
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Travel & Childcare Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
North Coast Ball Club Incorporated
|
$173.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Ridge Junior Cricket Club
|
$259.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Riding For The Disabled Association WA Incorporated
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$16,276.14
|
|
|
|
GST Input
Claimed To Be Credited To Employees Accounts For October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Shobukan Pty Ltd
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Surfing Western Australia Surf School
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$446.26
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Gymnastics Incorporated
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 3 Children
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002403
|
11/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Super
|
$850.00
|
|
|
|
Deduction From
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates
|
$278.33
|
|
|
|
Deduction From
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise
|
$7,048.95
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa
|
$5,880.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Lara Simpkins
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Sabine Winton
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Samantha Jane Fenn
|
$6,075.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts
|
$14,658.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance & ICT Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002404
|
10/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Application Fees
Accepted By The City - TPG Town Planning Urban Design - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002405
|
11/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curnow Group Pty Ltd
|
$68,612.42
|
|
|
|
Release Of
Retention - Quinns Beach Coastal Protection - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002406
|
12/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate
|
$940.63
|
|
|
|
Land Enquiry -
Various Department
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002407
|
17/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Apparatus
License Renewal Fees - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$2,581.66
|
|
|
|
Training -
Executive Recruitment 06 - 07.08.2015 - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Beilby Corporation
|
$1,490.50
|
|
|
|
Final Instalment
- Assignment Of Director Of Assets - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$336.16
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd
|
$999.96
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess
- WN 31963 - Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$215.15
|
|
|
|
Cabcharges -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd
|
$2,279.20
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway
|
$25,050.24
|
|
|
|
Bulk Verge
Collection - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$579.04
|
|
|
|
Water Barriers -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$67,550.27
|
|
|
|
Resurfacing -
Pelham Way Girrawheen - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Resurfacing -
Colne Way Girrawheen - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd
|
$16,698.00
|
|
|
|
Landscaping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Filmbites
|
$330.00
|
|
|
|
Forensic Makeup
- Clarkson Library - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Freds Lagoon Hardware
|
$482.30
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd
|
$3,453.33
|
|
|
|
Casual
Labour For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing
|
$4,493.62
|
|
|
|
Casual
Labour For The City
|
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd
|
$5,197.08
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing
|
$8,278.01
|
|
|
|
Paving Kingsway
Road - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Kmart Joondalup
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Fake Snow -
Heritage, Museum & Arts
|
|
|
|
|
LD Total
|
$4,950.00
|
|
|
|
Landscaping -
Brazier Road - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Horizons
|
$3,500.00
|
|
|
|
Business
Excellence Review, Executive Preparation And Workshop - CS&P
|
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd
|
$14,729.38
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd
|
$229,065.65
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 1 - Kingsway Olympic Sports Clubrooms Upgrade - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$339,727.79
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$54,187.56
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$24.64
|
|
|
|
Coloured Paper -
Museum Education Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group
|
$204.00
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniform -
D Hewett - Customer Relations
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce
|
$19,178.34
|
|
|
|
Casual
Labour For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Quality Press
|
$634.15
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
$423.50
|
|
|
|
Fence Repairs To
Baseball Net - Gumblossom Community Centre - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$258.06
|
|
|
|
Roadworks For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Robertsons Lifting & Rigging Pty Ltd
|
$374.00
|
|
|
|
Concrete Clutch
- Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd
|
$1,988.69
|
|
|
|
Lift Service - 4
X Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding
|
$10.12
|
|
|
|
Shredding
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia
|
$2,188.75
|
|
|
|
Training - First
Aid For 11 Staff - OSH
|
|
|
|
|
Training - First
Aid - G Pontifex - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company P Ltd
|
$4,998.54
|
|
|
|
Uniforms - Fire
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Surf Life Saving WA Incorporated
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Training - CPR
Refresher 06.11.2015 K Woodhouse - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Training - First
Aid Refresher - Funded Services Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade
|
$389.48
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Irrigation X 4 - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Various Items - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Urban Indigenous Western Australia
|
$1,670.00
|
|
|
|
Collective
Canvas - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd
|
$1,415.28
|
|
|
|
Traffic
Management For The City
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association
|
$298.00
|
|
|
|
Training -
Professional Risk & Natural Hazards 10.11.2015 - A Gavranich, N Stawarz -
City Growth
|
|
|
|
|
NAMN Forum -
Wetland Conservation - N Weber, R Simmonds, J Sommerville 04.11.2015 -
Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$7,310.26
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers
|
$16,104.66
|
|
|
|
Mulching Of
Greenwaste - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Wink Peace Pout Photobooths
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Photobooth Hire
25.10.2015 - Living & Leisure Expo - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$448.00
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Business Cards - Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002408
|
17/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$151,228.86
|
|
|
|
Fuel Charges For
October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
BPW Transpec Pty Ltd
|
$395.32
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical P Ltd
|
$75,038.85
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 3 - Community Centres Swipe Card, Security & Fire Detection
Systems - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002411
|
17/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Little Athletics Club
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker
|
$97.48
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of
Travel October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$36,493.20
|
|
|
|
Commission Fees
October 2015 - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd
|
$41,826.61
|
|
|
|
Marangaroo Golf
Course Commission Fees October 2015 - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$1,005.70
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate
|
$8,067.60
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental
Valuations - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Douglas Valeriani
|
$109.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Graham John Woodard
|
$328.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Gregory Johnson
|
$515.14
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Joe Arrigo
|
$241.14
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Mr John Baker
|
$164.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Mr John Beaton
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Payment - Shoppers
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Oscar Shu
|
$710.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
CPA Membership Fee - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty
|
$427.48
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis
Booking
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Kim Forrestal
|
$164.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington
|
$345.27
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Peggy Brown
|
$274.00
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Padbury Pumas Junior Basketball Club
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Basketball Club Incorporate
|
$1,700.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 13 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rock Bush Fire Brigade
|
$665.87
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Various Items - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sorrento Football Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Telstra - Plant Damages
|
$875.17
|
|
|
|
Alterations
& Repairs To Telstra Cable Hainsworth Avenue 07.10.2015 - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
The Scout Association of Australia
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$677.81
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Pty Ltd
|
$2,287.89
|
|
|
|
Monthly SMS
Alert Charges - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Junior Cricket Club
|
$1,990.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 12 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
$6,491.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Cabinet
- 13 Sinagra Street Wanneroo - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Westside BMX Club Incorporated
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
YMCA Of Perth Incorporated
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002412
|
18/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPE Solar
|
$23,706.76
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 2 - Phil Renkin Centre Stage Upgrade - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002413
|
18/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate
|
$5,027.23
|
|
|
|
Aerial
Photography Services - IT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002414
|
18/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd
|
$135.89
|
|
|
|
WLCC
Licence Fee For Period 01.10.2015 - 31.12.2015 - Cultural Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002415
|
20/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$347,565.49
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 9 - Koondoola Community Centre - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002417
|
25/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Man At Hand
|
$1,584.00
|
|
|
|
Render Coat -
Butler Community Centre Art Mural - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
A1 Apiaries
|
$860.00
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Bee
Hive - Hackney Way - 28.09.2015 - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Bee
Hives - Susan Park - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment
Of Two Illegal Bee Hives - San Teodora Park - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists
|
$1,760.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs To
Automatic Steps - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$404.62
|
|
|
|
First Aid
Supplies - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Adasound
|
$3,600.00
|
|
|
|
Sound Equipment
- Council Meetings - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Adform Engraving & Signs
|
$1,541.10
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Printed
Decals For Vehicles - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Name Badges -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Name Plates For
Photo Board - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Adrina Project Management Pty Ltd
|
$83,073.85
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 2 - Oldham Park Meeting Room Extension - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Adshel Street Furniture Pty Ltd
|
$700.70
|
|
|
|
Advertising -
Bus Shelters - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Press (2013) Pty Ltd
|
$6,798.00
|
|
|
|
Printing - 2015
Living & Leisure Expo Flyers - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Mailing Charges
- Cat & Dog - Community Safety
|
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Brochures - Your Cat - Community Safety
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Cat
Registration Forms - Community Safety
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Dog
Registration Notices - Community Safety
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Your
Dog & The Law Brochures - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Beach
To Bush Concert - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Window Tinting
|
$135.00
|
|
|
|
Window Film -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving
|
$5,055.56
|
|
|
|
Install Paving -
East Road - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
AGM Automation North
|
$1,006.50
|
|
|
|
Repair Automatic
Gate - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd
|
$360.47
|
|
|
|
Cylinder Rental
- Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia
|
$221.36
|
|
|
|
Fuel Filter -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers
|
$940.00
|
|
|
|
Mixed Floral
Wreath - R.S.L - Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
Large Wreaths X
5 & Medium Wreath X 1 - Remembrance Day - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Mixed Sympathy
Wreath - Purslow Funeral - N Manzas - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
ALH Group Ltd (BWS)
|
$88.90
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Wine
For Exhibition Opening - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Allerding & Associates
|
$3,470.58
|
|
|
|
Consulting
Services - 16 & 17 Royal James Court - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
AllightSykes Pty Ltd
|
$2,848.54
|
|
|
|
Servicing
Standby Generators - Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Allstamps
|
$11.00
|
|
|
|
Stamps - File
Copy - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Allwest Turfing
|
$93,306.40
|
|
|
|
Install Turf -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$2,536.23
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
AQWA
|
$608.00
|
|
|
|
Seniors Group
Outing - October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Arcus Wire Group Pty Ltd
|
$47.85
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Heritage & Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$812.20
|
|
|
|
Cash Collections
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Art On The Move
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Art On The Move
Workshop - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Artworks Conservation
|
$385.00
|
|
|
|
Conservation Of
Gramophone - Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram
|
$1,007.82
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd
|
$455.99
|
|
|
|
Asphalt -
Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Turf
|
$5,709.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Softfall
- Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
ATeam Cleaning Services
|
$2,320.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Service
- Wanneroo Showgrounds - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply
|
$84.63
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Audio Technik
|
$15,400.00
|
|
|
|
Sound Production
- Beach To Bush Concert - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Austraffic WA
|
$4,620.00
|
|
|
|
Conduct Traffic
Surveys - Hester & Baltimore - Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd
|
$757.31
|
|
|
|
License Fee -
Copyright Music - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$4,695.00
|
|
|
|
Annual
Subscription - Fasttrack Pass 01.11.2015 - 31.10.2016 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Laboratory Services Pty
|
$2,662.00
|
|
|
|
Oil Sample
Bottles - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Protection Services Pty Ltd
|
$13,846.12
|
|
|
|
Security
Services - Living And Leisure Expo - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Security
Services - Concert - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Blackbox Pty Ltd
|
$451.00
|
|
|
|
10 X 32GB SD
Cards - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro
|
$1,955.25
|
|
|
|
Floor Cleaner -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Avantgarde Technologies Pty Ltd
|
$1,031.25
|
|
|
|
Block Hour
Agreement - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Aveling Group
|
$650.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Work
Safely In The Construction Industry White Card Online - 10 X Staff - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Aventedge Pty Ltd
|
$2,304.50
|
|
|
|
Registration -
Women In Leadership Summit Australia 10 - 11.11.2015 - K Donker - Customer
Relations
|
|
|
|
|
Backyards To Barnyards
|
$311.06
|
|
|
|
Consumables -
Animal Care Centre - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Beardfoot Bookings & Promotions
|
$2,420.00
|
|
|
|
City Of Wanneroo
Presents - The Brow Performance 07.11.2015 - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres
|
$69,270.55
|
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$1,501.23
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Bengineering Transport Equipment
|
$2,750.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Cab/Tilt
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Beryl Weston
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of
Girrawheen Hall - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Fire &
Electrical Consulting Services - Phil Renkin Recreation Centre - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bibbulmun Track Foundation
|
$480.00
|
|
|
|
Guided Day Walk
- Gold Program
|
|
|
|
|
Bidvest Hospitality Perth
|
$995.20
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing
|
$1,948.08
|
|
|
|
Hire Of
Temporary Fencing - Various Locations - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bioscience Pty Ltd
|
$491.30
|
|
|
|
Supply Of
Bioprime - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd
|
$1,498.20
|
|
|
|
200 X Cooler
Bags With Logo - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Bluearth Foundation
|
$3,267.00
|
|
|
|
Holiday Program
October 2015 - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Boating Camping Fishing
|
$1,043.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited
|
$44.72
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Indus D
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop Pty Ltd
|
$1,142.71
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group
|
$3,524.94
|
|
|
|
Concrete Mix -
Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment
|
$60.50
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$6,218.63
|
|
|
|
Waste Oil Levy -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Bradbury Sewell Pty Ltd
|
$4,555.10
|
|
|
|
Preconstruction
Survey - Various Locations - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Dilapidation
Survey - Yanchep Surf Life Saving Project - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers
|
$576.38
|
|
|
|
Courier For
October 2015 - Health
|
|
|
|
|
Bubble Sports WA
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bubble Soccer
Activity 07.11.2015 Wanneroo Showgrounds - Events
|
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd
|
$26,147.36
|
|
|
|
Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Budget Truck Rentals
|
$473.33
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Truck -
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Hire Of
Refrigerated Trailer - City Of Wanneroo Presents Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Buggybuddys
|
$1,375.00
|
|
|
|
Brand Building
Package - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Bullsbrook Water Carriers
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
Water Cartage -
Riverlinks Ablution Block - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$6,316.89
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited
|
$11,207.24
|
|
|
|
Items For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Byprogress Pty Ltd
|
$1,790.00
|
|
|
|
Scooby Doo &
Spider Mountain - Climbing Wall & Tower - Lifestyle Expo 2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
C R Kennedy & Co Pty Ltd
|
$120.45
|
|
|
|
Repair Prism
Pole - Surveyors
|
|
|
|
|
Cablewise Electrical & Communication Pty Ltd
|
$1,375.00
|
|
|
|
Electrical Audit
- Oldham Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Caltex Energy
|
$27.44
|
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For
October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Campbells Wholesale Pty Ltd
|
$200.53
|
|
|
|
Distilled Water
- Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd
|
$11,350.80
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Services/Repairs - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd
|
$25,161.40
|
|
|
|
Works - Quinns
Beach Long Term Coastal Management - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Works - Quinns
Beach Ocean Pool Feasibility - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$9,003.39
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Materials For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory
|
$5,053.40
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Cat Welfare Society Incorporated
|
$1,925.00
|
|
|
|
Impound Fees
October 2015 - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
CBC Australia Pty Ltd
|
$242.50
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Central Security Manufacturing Pty
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Padlocks -
Property
|
|
|
|
|
Centurion Temporary Fencing
|
$4,133.53
|
|
|
|
Fencing - City
Of Wanneroo Presents Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA
|
$216.70
|
|
|
|
Battery For
Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited
|
$3,875.88
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Essentials Pty Ltd
|
$1,028.50
|
|
|
|
Vet Disinfectant
- Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering
|
$13,762.09
|
|
|
|
Catering
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Chocolate Drops
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Morning Tea -
Heritage Bus Tour - Heritage Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography
|
$1,216.25
|
|
|
|
Photography -
Citizenship Ceremony - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Photography -
Elected Members - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
City of Joondalup
|
$6,302.54
|
|
|
|
Flora Survey -
Northern Yellagonga Regional Park - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd
|
$561.00
|
|
|
|
Opac Editing
Training - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Civica Expo 2015
- IT
|
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd
|
$16,354.52
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway
|
$74,694.53
|
|
|
|
Waste Collection
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Skip Bin Hire -
Expo - Communications & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford Hallam Healthcare
|
$205.92
|
|
|
|
Powder Free
Gloves - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Clifton Perth
|
$41,901.64
|
|
|
|
Lighting &
Vision Requirements - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Coachtrans
|
$440.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of 18
Seater Bus - Social Support Outing Gloucester Park - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Coastal Services
|
$1,106.16
|
|
|
|
Repair Drink
Fridge - John Moloney Park Clubrooms - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Service -
Display Fridge - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$11,034.12
|
|
|
|
Equipment Hire
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd
|
$788.40
|
|
|
|
Beverages For
Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police
|
$88.80
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Police
Checks - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
CommunityToGo
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Community2Go App
- Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
Conway Highbury Pty Ltd
|
$3,663.00
|
|
|
|
Review Of Local
Laws - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia
|
$102.46
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts
|
$1,189.18
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Crush
|
$2,860.00
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Business Plan - Digital Artwork Production - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Cubic Solutions
|
$9,244.35
|
|
|
|
Stormtech
Soakway Systems For Wanneroo Showgrounds Carpark - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd
|
$161.70
|
|
|
|
Calibrate
ECM - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth
|
$637,470.15
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle X 3
- Fuso Tip Truck - $210,186.90 Each
|
|
|
|
|
Inspection,
Weighbridge & License Fees - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited
|
$2,789.21
|
|
|
|
Software And
License Fees - IT
|
|
|
|
|
De Vita & Dixon Lawyers
|
$37,039.20
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Delion Pty Ltd
|
$648.80
|
|
|
|
ADSL2+ Wireless
Hotspot, Call Out To Fix Faulty Cable At Clarkson Youth Centre - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd
|
$19,968.69
|
|
|
|
4 X Dell
Computers & Accessories - IT
|
|
|
|
|
3 X Dell Monitor
- IT
|
|
|
|
|
Software Support
- IT
|
|
|
|
|
Department of the State Heritage Office
|
$146.00
|
|
|
|
Fremantle Prison
Tour - School Holiday Activities - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$5,369.58
|
|
|
|
Locking Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas
|
$24,085.29
|
|
|
|
Plumbing
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print
|
$1,698.40
|
|
|
|
Printing - Swim
School Notice Board - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Banner - Like Us
On Facebook - Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Corflute Signs -
Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Corflute Signs -
Charity Golf - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Swim
School Sign - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
6 X Corflutes
Australia Wide 4 Exhibition - Heritage & Museums
|
|
|
|
|
Corflute Signs -
Wanneroo Regional Museum - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
DMH Precision Engineering
|
$500.50
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Rear
Loader Compactor - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Documentary Services Pty Ltd
|
$88.00
|
|
|
|
Company Current
And Historical Search - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Don@100smallthings Pty Ltd
|
$12,171.50
|
|
|
|
Loft
Training/Consulting September Week Cancelled - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical P Ltd
|
$75,015.58
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 4 - Community Centres Swipe Card, Security & Fire Detection
Systems - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd
|
$1,254.00
|
|
|
|
Sweeping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Driving Wheels
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Wheel Alignments
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Dunbar Services (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$35.75
|
|
|
|
New Civic Centre
- Filter Exchange - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
DVG Wanneroo Mitsubishi
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Antenna - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Dy-Mark (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$761.25
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Dymocks Joondalup
|
$509.08
|
|
|
|
Book Stock For
Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher
|
$2,271.20
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
|
$836.95
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Development Australia Limited
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Membership - S
Carracher 01.01.2016 - 31.12.2016 - Planning & Sustainability
|
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd
|
$10,909.80
|
|
|
|
Surveys -
Hardcastle Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Elan Media Partners Pty Ltd
|
$2,564.81
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of
Stock - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$27,903.43
|
|
|
|
Reticulation
Items - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation
Modification - Da Vinci Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga
|
$246.95
|
|
|
|
Uniforms -
Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Encore Kids Parties
|
$1,480.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment -
Wanneroo Showgrounds - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd
|
$145,083.34
|
|
|
|
Landscaping
Works - Various Locations - Parks, Projects
|
|
|
|
|
ENZED Service Centre Perth North
|
$3,030.75
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Ergolink
|
$2,213.55
|
|
|
|
Ergonomic
Equipment - Injury Management
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services
|
$2,259.05
|
|
|
|
Fire Equipment
October Inspection - Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Events Industry Association
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Legal
Rights And Responsibilities - V Green, G Cowan And A Drew - 27.10.2015
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution Traffic Control Pty Ltd
|
$10,114.59
|
|
|
|
Traffic
Management Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Excalibur Printing
|
$444.41
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$1,188.00
|
|
|
|
Desk Top Audit X
9 Playgrounds - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd
|
$2,196.63
|
|
|
|
Magazine
Subscriptions - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Feral Invasion Species Eradication
|
$1,325.00
|
|
|
|
Fox Trapping
& Control - Yellagonga Regional Park - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services
|
$1,187.45
|
|
|
|
Location Of
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA
|
$40.66
|
|
|
|
Reflective
Surname Stickers - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Foxtel
|
$90.00
|
|
|
|
Foxtel
Subscription - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Freds Lagoon Hardware
|
$559.34
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment
|
$3,661.21
|
|
|
|
Repairs To
Appliance - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$236.04
|
|
|
|
Paper Supplies -
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
GC Sales (WA)
|
$4,554.00
|
|
|
|
Locking Posts -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd
|
$261,878.25
|
|
|
|
Pruning Services
- Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Stump Grinding -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Roots Removal -
Marina Way - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Root Barriers -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Clear Site
Vegetation - Marmion/Rochester - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Getty Images Pty Ltd
|
$3,571.66
|
|
|
|
Stock
Subscription 13.10.2015 - 13.10.2016 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$27,775.00
|
|
|
|
Girrawheen
Library Compliance Audit - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Globe Australia
|
$3,254.96
|
|
|
|
Broadwet 20
Litre Drum - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia
|
$815.00
|
|
|
|
Works - Dundebar
Road - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Greenline Ag Pty Ltd
|
$242.32
|
|
|
|
Oil Filters -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service
|
$3,085.50
|
|
|
|
Hiab Service To
Move Goals - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$1,037.74
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Gymcare
|
$372.90
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Of
Gym Equipment - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd
|
$21,374.59
|
|
|
|
Concrete Works -
Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd
|
$404.08
|
|
|
|
Newspaper
Deliveries For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Haz-Ed Services Pty Ltd
|
$3,826.90
|
|
|
|
Install Ladder -
Clarkson Library - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Headset ERA
|
$330.00
|
|
|
|
Plantronics
Wireless Headset - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd
|
$2,989.41
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics
|
$1,168.33
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Hendercare
|
$21,701.24
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd
|
$8,897.90
|
|
|
|
Installation Of
Whirly Birds - Bush Fire Brigade Clarkson - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Airconditioner
Work - Clarkson Youth Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Removal Of
Asbestos - Two Rocks Community Facility - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs &
Painting - External Staircase - Wanneroo Community Centre - Building
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty
|
$868.24
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters
- Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Hocking Planning & Architecture Pty Ltd
|
$13,200.00
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Heritage Inventory Review - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Holton Connor Pty Ltd
|
$4,840.00
|
|
|
|
Architectural
Services - Yanchep Open Space Amenities - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$988.63
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim
|
$3,696.22
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products
|
$12,590.03
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Materials - Various Locations - Projects/Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps
|
$43,761.19
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Irrigation Works - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
ID Equipment Pty Ltd Trading As Vermeer (WA & NT)
|
$281.60
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
InfoCouncil Pty Ltd
|
$2,645.50
|
|
|
|
Migration Of
Historical Meeting Papers To Website - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Hygiene
|
$2,554.04
|
|
|
|
Hygienic
Services - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services
|
$7,422.42
|
|
|
|
Call Centre
Services September 2015 - Customer Relations
|
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd
|
$10,387.05
|
|
|
|
Unisex Toilets X
5 - Hester Avenue - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilets
X 11 - Lifestyle Expo 2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Various
Items - City Of Wanneroo Presents Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd
|
$1,893.40
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing
|
$3,788.10
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA
|
$2,150.00
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Registration - Training Week 16 - 20.11.2015 - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Australia
|
$1,369.50
|
|
|
|
Training -
Irrigation Workshop 04.11.2015 - C Timms, W Pedretti & M Meuwese - Land
Development
|
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd
|
$1,948.59
|
|
|
|
Chemical
Supplies - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd
|
$5,409.46
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$298.01
|
|
|
|
Craft Supplies -
Alexander Heights Community House - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Jadu Software Pty Ltd
|
$440.00
|
|
|
|
Ward Boundaries
Data Import - IT
|
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd
|
$12,058.11
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Jarrad Seng
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Photography For
Living & Leisure Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Jaycar Pty Ltd
|
$18.95
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
JB Militaria Antiques
|
$1,855.00
|
|
|
|
Items For Museum
|
|
|
|
|
JBA Surveys
|
$4,290.00
|
|
|
|
Project Lot 3003
- Vancouver Parade - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Boundary Survey
- Marangaroo Golf Course - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffery Electronics
|
$4,944.50
|
|
|
|
Irrigation
Control - Wanneroo Showgrounds Lighting Control System - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Coachline
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Bus Hire -
Bibbulman Track - Gold Program
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$55.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees -
HR
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Office National
|
$237.50
|
|
|
|
Toners -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Joy Legge
|
$3,900.00
|
|
|
|
Valuation Of
City's Art Collection - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Jukebox Lady
|
$175.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment -
Seniors Week Morning Tea - Library
|
|
|
|
|
KDAire Mechanical Services
|
$28,647.11
|
|
|
|
Airconditioning
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing
|
$1,462.56
|
|
|
|
Install Kerbing
- Joondalup Drive - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Kismet (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$1,225.00
|
|
|
|
Supply Event ATM
Trailer - Living & Leisure Expo 25.10.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Event ATM
Trailer - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Kleenit
|
$1,424.55
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal
Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Kristoffer Myhre
|
$4,469.52
|
|
|
|
Photography -
Charity Golf Day - Communication And Events
|
|
|
|
|
Videography -
Living & Leisure Expo - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Videography
Services - Wanneroo Presents Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions
|
$7,673.09
|
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading For The City
|
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables Pty Ltd
|
$12.07
|
|
|
|
Tip Cleaners -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire
|
$392.15
|
|
|
|
Indoor Plant
Hire For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Mini Hardware & Boxes Galore
|
$517.21
|
|
|
|
Various Tools -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express
|
$1,295.13
|
|
|
|
Laundry Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
$62,621.75
|
|
|
|
Apply Fertiliser
- Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Apply Supagreen
Plus - Kingsway Cricket - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Turf Works -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Hollow Time
Aerate Turf & Smudge - Oldham Reserve - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Vertidraining -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Mowing Of Dry
Parks - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
LD Total
|
$99,652.18
|
|
|
|
Landscape
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Works - July -
August 2015 - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Leamac Picture Framing
|
$85.00
|
|
|
|
Framing Of
Artwork - Lotus Print - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Seat Pty Ltd
|
$2,475.00
|
|
|
|
Learning Base
Fee October 2015 - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific
|
$1,350.75
|
|
|
|
Licence Fees -
Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Life Size Standups
|
$583.50
|
|
|
|
Custom Lifesize
Cardboard Cutout - Kim & Matt The Block Sky High - Living & Leisure
Expo 2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Instagram Selfie
Frame - Lifestyle Expo 2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Lisa Fernandez
|
$2,500.00
|
|
|
|
MC Services For
Spring Into It 25.10.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Lobel Events
|
$24,991.68
|
|
|
|
Electrical Works
- Living & Leisure Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Work
- City Of Wanneroo Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Lock Joint Australia
|
$1,661.00
|
|
|
|
Parts - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
LOTE Libraries Direct Pty Ltd
|
$2,439.74
|
|
|
|
Vietnamese DVD's
- Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd
|
$8,778.00
|
|
|
|
Architectural
Consultancy - Alexander Heights Adult Day Centre - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Mailforce Document Solutions Pty Ltd
|
$24,192.38
|
|
|
|
Printing - 2015 /
2016 Second Instalment Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Print &
Issue - 2015 / 2015 Final Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Print &
Issue - Interim Rates Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$11,456.87
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Mammoth Equipment & Exhausts Pty Ltd
|
$1,483.35
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Co. Pty Ltd
|
$423.06
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Marianne Annereau
|
$303.93
|
|
|
|
Google Business
View Virtual Tour - WLCC
|
|
|
|
|
Photography
Services - Tourdash Gold - WLCC
|
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd
|
$30,729.44
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd
|
$22.55
|
|
|
|
Hinge Pins -
Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$74,176.85
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment
Hire For The City
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors
|
$9,693.08
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mercury Group of Companies Pty Ltd
|
$2,750.00
|
|
|
|
E-Recruitment Monthly Fee - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Change Request -
Ability To Invite Applicants To Apply For Position - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Meridian Services
|
$1,877.82
|
|
|
|
Provision Of
Security Officer - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Meter Office
|
$201.52
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Cash Register Company
|
$97.68
|
|
|
|
Thermal Paper
Rolls - Library
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$382,802.38
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd
|
$2,862.46
|
|
|
|
Fuel Issues
October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$7,067.50
|
|
|
|
Reinstall Shade
Sails - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Install Slide -
Belvouir Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Gate
- Wanneroo Recreation Centre - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Removal Of
Picnic Setting - Broadview Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Install Park
Furniture - Rotary Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Replace Seat -
Charnwood Reserve - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors
|
$894.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$145.53
|
|
|
|
Stihl Springs -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Mowmaster Turf Equipment
|
$2,835.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Edward Henry Kelly
|
$170.00
|
|
|
|
Assistance With
The Election Of Deputy Mayor - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Nastech WA Pty Ltd
|
$3,560.00
|
|
|
|
Preparation Of
Interest Only Deposited Plan - Braxier Road 7 Capricorn Esplanade Yanchep -
Property
|
|
|
|
|
National Measurement Institute
|
$1,604.20
|
|
|
|
Analysis Fees -
Wangara Sump - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Water Samples
Tested - Ridgewood Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$98,957.73
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
Works - Various Locations - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Neopost Australia Pty Ltd
|
$104.16
|
|
|
|
Various Supplies
- Printroom - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Nespresso Professional
|
$526.00
|
|
|
|
Coffee Capsules
For CEO's Coffee Machine - Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Milk Frother -
Office Of The CEO
|
|
|
|
|
Newsxpress Ocean Keys
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Newspapers -
Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$8,332.31
|
|
|
|
Pest Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists
|
$3,136.10
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$2,360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Glass
Replacement/Repair - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting
|
$3,584.00
|
|
|
|
Beach Cleaning
Services - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Nutrition Australia WA Division
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Cooking
Demonstration - Hainsworth Leisure Centre 13.10.2015 - Community Food Network
- Healthy Communities
|
|
|
|
|
Nutrition Systems
|
$1,108.25
|
|
|
|
Protein Bars -
Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean Website Design
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Courier Fees -
Leaflet Distribution - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$3,998.50
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$296.95
|
|
|
|
Badgy Ribbon
& Cards - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Ognenis Surveying Trust
|
$5,280.00
|
|
|
|
Survey Pickup -
Romeo Road - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd
|
$62,011.92
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services - Connolly Drive Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services - Marmion Ave - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Owen Consulting Quantity Surveyors Construction Consultants
|
$3,685.00
|
|
|
|
Quantity
Surveying - Banksia Grove Sports Grounds Changerooms - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
P & M Automotive Equipment
|
$228.80
|
|
|
|
Hoist Service -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group
|
$15,468.64
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms -
Various Employees & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies
|
$6,125.00
|
|
|
|
Arboricultural
Advice - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Picus Sonic
Tomography Test - Opportunity Play Space - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Aerial
Inspection - Civic Drive - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphite
Inspection - Aquamotion - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Pedersens Event Hire
|
$939.84
|
|
|
|
Fence Hire - 06
- 09.11.2015 - City Of Wanneroo Presents Concert 07.11.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Penske Power Systems Pty Ltd
|
$2,207.04
|
|
|
|
AD Blue 10L Cube
- Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Castings
|
$1,804.00
|
|
|
|
4 X Plaques -
Cultural Services
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre
|
$352.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning -
Community Transport Buses - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing
|
$1,485.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Services
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd
|
$530.20
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Maxi Charters
|
$990.00
|
|
|
|
Bus Hire - City
Of Wanneroo Presents Concert 07.11.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Relaxation Therapy
|
$285.00
|
|
|
|
Relaxation &
Stretching Sessions - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pharaohs Vending Services
|
$353.86
|
|
|
|
Confectionary -
Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Phase One Audio
|
$3,360.50
|
|
|
|
Audio Equipment
- Living & Leisure Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting
|
$5,178.80
|
|
|
|
Repair BBQ -
Delamere Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Repair Block
Work - Longford / Kingsway - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Sand Sifting -
Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
PK Print Pty Ltd
|
$526.00
|
|
|
|
Hainsworth
Postal Flyers Delivered To PMP - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Plantrite
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Collection Of
Propagation/Cutting Material - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Wireless N Modem
Router - IT
|
|
|
|
|
PMP Distribution
|
$1,196.50
|
|
|
|
Distribution Of
Flyers - Living & Leisure Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Of
Flyers - Girrawheen Area - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Portable Cooling Solutions Australia
|
$1,150.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Power Vac Pty Ltd
|
$1,183.07
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
PRC Building Services Pty Ltd
|
$9,320.17
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
Clearing And Certificate - Ashley Road - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$35,655.68
|
|
|
|
Alarm/CCTV
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd
|
$1,876.93
|
|
|
|
Printing - WBA
Flyers - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Kingsway Indoor Stadium Flyers
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Swim
School Flyers - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Flyers - City Of
Wanneroo Presents Concert - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce
|
$1,742.84
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Property Services
|
$14,135.00
|
|
|
|
Painting - Phil
Renking Recreation Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Project Industries
|
$9,603.39
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$1,819.79
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Design
|
$210.38
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Design Of ED Icon For An Application Artworking - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Put On Happy Face - Face Painting
|
$1,296.00
|
|
|
|
Face Painting -
City Of Wanneroo Presents Concert 07.11.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Qwest Property Pty Ltd
|
$1,650.00
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Ground Lease Valuation - Peak Road Neerabup - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Beattie Bosworth
|
$2,035.00
|
|
|
|
Preparation Of
Cost - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd
|
$547.49
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management
|
$4,203.16
|
|
|
|
Document
Retrieval Services - Information Management
|
|
|
|
|
Red Dot Stores
|
$147.20
|
|
|
|
Halloween
Decorations - Clarkson Youth Centre - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Lollies &
Decorations - Halloween Party At Yanchep Drop In Program - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Redimed Pty Ltd
|
$4,587.71
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Reece's Hire & Structures
|
$19,715.30
|
|
|
|
Barrier/Marquee
& Furniture Hire - Events - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Charge For Loss
Of White Pippee Chairs - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing
|
$50,992.70
|
|
|
|
Fencing Works -
Various Locations - Property/Conservation/Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Richgro
|
$345.00
|
|
|
|
Lawn Mix - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Vegi Mix -
Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd
|
$4,733.86
|
|
|
|
Image Charges -
Printroom - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Finance
|
$6,589.00
|
|
|
|
Lease Fees -
Print Room - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services
|
$1,493.80
|
|
|
|
Linemarking -
Marmion/Rochester - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia
|
$6,637.90
|
|
|
|
Various Street
Name Plates - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Green Lettering
- 1/4P 7.30 - 9.30am 2.30 - 4.00pm - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Caution
Swooping Magpies - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Asbestos
Warning - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Barrier Mesh -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Fissure
Caution - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Black
Spot - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Accrod
Parking - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Works - Wanneroo
Showgrounds Car Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Signs - No
Smoking, No Entry Authorised Persons & This Protective Equipment Must Be
Worn - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Letters A
- Z - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Stickers -
Kangaroo Paw Logo - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Bollards -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Community
Survey - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$172,554.73
|
|
|
|
Road Works -
Various Locations - Projects/Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Double Trading As Double Hire
|
$5,170.00
|
|
|
|
Shade Sail -
Events
|
|
|
|
|
Rocla Quarry Products
|
$2,325.31
|
|
|
|
Brickies Sand -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Rowan Marshall
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Wooden Stand -
Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd
|
$2,135.25
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd
|
$94.05
|
|
|
|
Sea Container -
Kingsway Olympic Clubrooms Compliance Projects - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
RPS Metocean Pty Ltd
|
$29,387.60
|
|
|
|
AWAC Deployment
- Quinns Beach - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
S D Davey & K Van Dort
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment -
Working Dog Demonstration - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$337.26
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Sage Consulting Engineers
|
$1,237.50
|
|
|
|
Professional
Services - Kingsway Baseball - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Watts
|
$287.00
|
|
|
|
Workshop - Paper
Shoe - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies
|
$2,658.46
|
|
|
|
First Aid
Supplies - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd
|
$1,988.69
|
|
|
|
Lift/Escalator
Service X 4 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Lawrence Collins
|
$225.00
|
|
|
|
Photography -
Charity Golf Day - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Sealanes
|
$644.57
|
|
|
|
Catering
Supplies - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
Seatbelt Solutions
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Seat Belt -
Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sebel Furniture Ltd
|
$2,441.33
|
|
|
|
Flex Adjustable
Desk - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Duralite Tables
- Addison Park Clubrooms - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Seton Australia
|
$144.98
|
|
|
|
2 X Signs -
Slippery When Wet - OSH
|
|
|
|
|
Sew & Go
|
$371.80
|
|
|
|
Replace Old
Badges - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Shaun Nannup
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Concert -
Welcome To Country - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Shawsett Training & Safety Pty Ltd
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Training -
4wd - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals
|
$1,141.05
|
|
|
|
Pool Chemical
Supplies - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Sign A Rama
|
$847.00
|
|
|
|
Library Signage
Change - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Retractable
Banner - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Sign Supermarket
|
$25.00
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Letters -
Time Travelling Toys - Heritage & Museums
|
|
|
|
|
Sign Synergy Pty Ltd
|
$48.40
|
|
|
|
2 X Office Name
Plates - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sita Western Re-Cycling Pty Ltd
|
$227.70
|
|
|
|
Security
Shredding - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio
|
$5,280.00
|
|
|
|
Stage 1 Concept
Design & Presentation - Banksia Grove Sports Ground Changerooms Facility
- Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA)
|
$65,670.47
|
|
|
|
Works - Arterial
Road - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports
|
$42,952.80
|
|
|
|
Lay Synthetic
Turf - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Repair Match
Wickets - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Install
Basketball Equipment - Kingsway - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
SMB Electrical Services
|
$14,856.77
|
|
|
|
Release Of
Retention - Installation Of Kingsway Baseball Lighting - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Spear Dojos
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Self Defence
Seminar - 04.11.2015 - Healthy Communities
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum Fire & Security
|
$242.00
|
|
|
|
Reset Fire Panel
After False Alarm - New Civic Centre - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Speedline Instruments
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Iveco Cluster
Repair - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd
|
$3,509.00
|
|
|
|
Soil Analysis -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Nematode Testing
- Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd
|
$415.48
|
|
|
|
Craft Supplies -
Various Service Units
|
|
|
|
|
Squire Patton Boggs
|
$10,046.30
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia
|
$844.58
|
|
|
|
First Aid Cover
- Bushfire Awareness Day - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
First Aid Cover
- Living & Leisure - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Stanlee WA
|
$56.76
|
|
|
|
Kinox
Connoisserve Jug X 4 - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
State Law Publisher
|
$610.65
|
|
|
|
Government
Gazette Advertising - Rating Services/Governance
|
|
|
|
|
State Library of WA
|
$2,681.80
|
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged
Book Charges - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$603.53
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Supplies - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services
|
$16,796.00
|
|
|
|
Works To Trade
& To Trace Wastewater System - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Recovery -
Fleet Workshop - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Pump Inspections
- Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company P Ltd
|
$369.24
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Stiles Electrical
|
$5,764.00
|
|
|
|
Replacement Keys
To Control Rotary Switches - Riverlinks Park - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Investigate
Existing Poles - Ocean Keys Shopping Precint - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Subaru Wangara
|
$18.52
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo
|
$1,733.65
|
|
|
|
Catering
Services For Various Council Functions
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware
|
$2,812.70
|
|
|
|
Brooms &
Gutter Brushes - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Supercrane Engineered Lifting Technology
|
$1,047.20
|
|
|
|
Service Overhead
Crane - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette
|
$280.00
|
|
|
|
Drycleaning Of
Sporting Bibs - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades
|
$1,815.00
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install
Shade Sails - Rotary Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Swan Towing Services Pty Ltd
|
$385.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Services
- Parks
|
|
|
|
|
T & C Hiab Service
|
$150.43
|
|
|
|
Mosaic Tiles
Supplies - Hainsworth Community Centre - Heritage
|
|
|
|
|
Tanya Voltchanskaya
|
$850.00
|
|
|
|
Photography -
The City Of Wanneroo Presents - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Taskers
|
$1,133.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Flagpole
- Clarkson Library - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Technifire 2000
|
$512.60
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Tenderlink.com
|
$1,347.50
|
|
|
|
7 X Public
Tenders - Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
The Factory
|
$53,913.75
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of
Christmas Decoration - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
The Lulus Pty Ltd
|
$440.00
|
|
|
|
MC - Irene
Hopkinson For Citizenship Ceremony 26.10.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia
|
$13,925.85
|
|
|
|
Certificates -
Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Pool Inspections
- Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For C & K Kirkham Trust
|
$1,870.00
|
|
|
|
Radrock Climbing
Wall & Dual Bungee Trampolines - The City Of Wanneroo Presents -
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for GBAS Unit Trust
|
$8,525.00
|
|
|
|
Investigation Of
Golf Course Operating Models - Property
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for K M Productions Trust
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Artist -
Lifestyle Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For Sprayking WA Unit Trust
|
$29,293.42
|
|
|
|
Weed Spraying -
Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Talis Unit Trust
|
$7,639.50
|
|
|
|
Consultancy -
Wangara Landfill Geotechnical Investigation - Property
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for The Entertainment B Trust
|
$4,577.10
|
|
|
|
Superhero Mask
Activity - The City Of Wanneroo Presents - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Trucker Cap
Activity - The City Of Wanneroo Presents - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
The Watershed Water Systems
|
$5,121.28
|
|
|
|
Reticulation
Items - Projects/Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Think Promotional
|
$1,841.40
|
|
|
|
Show Bags,
Printing Of Plates - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
TLC Safety Pty Ltd
|
$1,650.00
|
|
|
|
Giant Bubble
Activity - The City Of Wanneroo Presents - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd
|
$663.88
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Toms Towbars
|
$270.00
|
|
|
|
Towbar Swap -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Top Of The Ladder Gutter Cleaning
|
$8,701.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Gutters
& Downpipes - Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd
|
$53,823.22
|
|
|
|
Limestone Signs
- Various - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Tourism Council Western Australia
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
2015 Perth
Airport WA Tourism - Gala Dinner
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota Material Handling (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$609.50
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
TQuip
|
$727.45
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd
|
$5,328.40
|
|
|
|
Replace Spare
Blower - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Repair To Blower
- Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement X 2
Ball Valves - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly Services
- Filtration & Disinfection Systems - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$990.66
|
|
|
|
Electrical Works
- Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd
|
$6,157.36
|
|
|
|
Apply Weed
Control - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$87,334.28
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Fee
- Carramar & Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd
|
$76.98
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Veda Advantage Information Services Solutions
|
$293.67
|
|
|
|
Bureau Charges -
Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd
|
$6,872.40
|
|
|
|
Bin Collections
- Various Locations - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd
|
$1,985.98
|
|
|
|
7 Switch Power
Mode - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Install Two Way
Radio/Handsets - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Vetcare Innovation Pty Ltd
|
$833.40
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia 10 X
Dogs/Cats - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Microchip X 1
Canine/Feline - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Medications For
Dog/Cat - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd
|
$56,944.48
|
|
|
|
Traffic
Management Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd
|
$616.00
|
|
|
|
Repair To Roller
Door - Butler Community Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repair To
Sliding Door - WRC - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service
|
$2,410.56
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company
|
$1,077.74
|
|
|
|
Limestone -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association
|
$1,912.68
|
|
|
|
Training - 3 X
Half Day Purchasing Policy Training - Purchasing
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery
|
$1,179.09
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade
|
$9,600.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement -
Burning Heaps - Marangaroo/Carramar Golf Course - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$55,644.36
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$496.05
|
|
|
|
Groceries For
Various Council Programs
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$6,084.65
|
|
|
|
Towing Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$877.11
|
|
|
|
Name Badges -
Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Student
Citizenship Medal - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Warwick Firearms & Militaria
|
$136.20
|
|
|
|
WWII Armourer
Inspection Box - Heritage & Museum
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$9,028.85
|
|
|
|
Immunisation
Clinics - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Westbuild Products Pty Ltd
|
$910.98
|
|
|
|
Cement - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Treasury Corporation
|
$922,309.00
|
|
|
|
Loan Repayment -
Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Youth Jazz Orchestra Association
|
$5,500.00
|
|
|
|
Artist Fees -
City Of Wanneroo Presents - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers
|
$38,940.88
|
|
|
|
Removal Of
Greenwaste - Motivation Drive - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Westrac
|
$275.12
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd
|
$350.90
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd
|
$44,888.33
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Wink Peace Pout Photobooths
|
$850.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of
Photobooth - City Of Wanneroo Presents Concert 07.11.2015 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Woodlands Distributors & Agencies P Ltd
|
$197.45
|
|
|
|
1 X Dog Bag
Dispenser - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber
|
$882.86
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms -
Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Workshed Children's Mosaics
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Design
Development Stage - Quinns Beach Toilets Mosaic Works - Heritage, Museums
& Arts
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$616.00
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Business Cards - Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture
|
$337,184.23
|
|
|
|
Marmion Avenue
Extension - Remove/Install New Streetlights - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Youth Futures WA Incorporated
|
$14,167.62
|
|
|
|
Provision Of
Outreach Services October 2015 - Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002418
|
24/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pindan Pty Ltd
|
$112,994.08
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1
- Pearsall Hocking Community Centre - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
R J Vincent & Co
|
$515,661.28
|
|
|
|
Payment
Certificate 7 - Lenore Road Upgrade Stage 2 - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002419
|
24/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$283.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$827.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$499,200.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Butler Netball Club Incorporated
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$655.49
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$5,958.22
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$844.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby
|
$388.19
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
16.09.2015 - 17.11.2015
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver
|
$308.03
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
01.09.2015 - 03.11.2015
|
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd
|
$1,929.20
|
|
|
|
Mail Preparation
Fee - October 2015 - IM
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning
|
$6,557.00
|
|
|
|
Application Fees Accepted By The City Applicant: Urbis Pty Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport
|
$643.95
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Search
Fees - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$956.35
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
High Flyers Gym
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,029.53
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
North Coast Ball Club Incorporated
|
$238.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Brothers Touch Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 2 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Quinns Mindarie Surf Lifesaving Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 1 Child
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$15,109.67
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
WA Electoral Commission
|
$4,784.19
|
|
|
|
Services
Provided - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Joondalup Tee Ball Club
|
$1,183.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 7 Children
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
$17,578.00
|
|
|
|
Street Lighting
- Kingsway - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Woodvale Little Athletics Club
|
$645.00
|
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher
X 4 Children
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002420
|
25/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baguette Me Not
|
$132.00
|
|
|
|
Staff Voucher -
Lifestyle Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Community Newspapers
|
$123.35
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Datacom Systems (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$14,543.10
|
|
|
|
Disaster
Recovery - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd
|
$114.56
|
|
|
|
Newspapers -
CEO's Office
|
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services
|
$3,954.64
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$130.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Smash Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Excess - WN
332987 - Insurance Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions
|
$1,193.43
|
|
|
|
New Laser
Printer - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Move It
|
$2,062.50
|
|
|
|
Removal Services
For Various Council Functions
|
|
|
|
|
NVMS Pty Ltd
|
$1,919.50
|
|
|
|
Calibration
Services - Regulatory
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce
|
$4,932.71
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management
|
$67.76
|
|
|
|
Document
Management Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Redimed Pty Ltd
|
$302.50
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Rhythm Fix
|
$390.00
|
|
|
|
1 Hour Drum
Circle - WLCC - Heritage, Museums & Arts
|
|
|
|
|
Sheridans For Badges
|
$582.74
|
|
|
|
Councillors
& Partners Name Badges - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Stats
|
$1,155.00
|
|
|
|
Soil
Infiltration Test - Hazel Avenue - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Stats WA Pty Ltd
|
$446.60
|
|
|
|
Material Testing
- Wanneroo Showgrounds - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
WA Safety And Training Pty Ltd
|
$3,850.00
|
|
|
|
Safety Officer -
Living And Leisure Expo - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$325.60
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsons Sign Solutions
|
$947.10
|
|
|
|
Brass Desk Name
Plates - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$56.00
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Business Cards X 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002421
|
25/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase
Transaction - September 2015 - Breakdown On Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002422
|
26/11/2015
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd
|
$67,305.85
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 9
- Kingsway - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$31,640.38
|
|
|
|
Roadworks -
Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002422
|
26/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municiple Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase
Transaction - October 2015 - Breakdown On Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - EFT's
|
$11,439,196.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL
AUSTRALIA BANK PURCHASING CARDS
|
|
00002399
|
09/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank - August 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Subscription - J2 Efax Plus Services -August 2015 -
August 2016
|
$198.00
|
|
|
|
Paypal 6 x Otterbox Defender Case for HTC ONE M8 Mobile Phones
|
$239.70
|
|
|
|
Mobile-Mate 1 x HTC ONE XL Battery
|
$46.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Coles - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$538.30
|
|
|
|
D & A Food Pty Ltd - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$105.40
|
|
|
|
EAE Holdings Pty Ltd - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$402.29
|
|
|
|
Red Dot Stores - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$17.94
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$387.88
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Supa IGA - Purchases For In House Catering
|
$596.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Crema JD Pty Ltd - Meeting
|
$68.80
|
|
|
|
Instant Scaffolds WA - Scaffolding - Training Purposes
|
$896.50
|
|
|
|
Lay Trading Pty Ltd - Lunches Volunteers
|
$77.15
|
|
|
|
Pinjarra Bakery - Mad Meals - Lunch
|
$37.45
|
|
|
|
Chippys Fish Cafe Food - Volunteers
|
$51.40
|
|
|
|
Duvas Wanneroo Food - Volunteers
|
$61.50
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Washing Machine Hose
|
$26.98
|
|
|
|
Better Pets And Gardens - Cat Food And Dog Leads
|
$70.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Thorpe Bowker - Purchase ISBNS - Community History Library
|
$139.00
|
|
|
|
Paypal - Error To Be Reimbursed Trim 15/470494
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Water Refills For Yanchep Library
|
$43.20
|
|
|
|
The Disk Doctor - DVD/CD Cleaning Spray (1 Litre Refill)
|
$29.90
|
|
|
|
Apple Itunes Store - Purchasing App For Library Tablet
|
$6.49
|
|
|
|
Nespresso Australia - Coffee Pods For Programmes
|
$177.50
|
|
|
|
Kmart - CD Player For Main Library And Stock Purchases
|
$71.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural - Hardware Purchases
|
$452.14
|
|
|
|
Beyond Tools - Sharpen Blade
|
$68.75
|
|
|
|
Blyth Enterprises - Castors
|
$78.54
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases
|
$2,898.64
|
|
|
|
Burdens Australia - Drainage Supplies
|
$1,236.66
|
|
|
|
Calidad Industries - Opal Dome
|
$400.40
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology - Medical Fees
|
$44.00
|
|
|
|
Graham G Jacobs Pty Ltd - Medical Fees
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Jindalee Pharmacy - Incorrect Card Use
|
$9.99
|
|
|
|
Masters - Hardware Purchases
|
$374.13
|
|
|
|
Productive Plastics - Cut To Size Acrylic Sheet
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Sign Synergy - Watch Your Step Sign
|
$41.80
|
|
|
|
Solver Decorator - Paint Supplies
|
$1,848.15
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Glass - Laminated Safety Glass
|
$77.30
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber - Safety Items
|
$209.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flexipurchase - August 2015
|
$12,430.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002421
|
25/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Hospitality September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Coles - Purchases for in house catering
|
$861.20
|
|
|
|
Miss Maud - Purchases for in house catering
|
$264.85
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - Purchases for in house catering
|
$282.53
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Supa IGA - Purchases for in house catering
|
$234.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - IT September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft - Microsoft Telephone Support (Email outage)
|
$354.44
|
|
|
|
Paypal - 3 x Micro USB Car Chargers for Building Maintenance
|
$19.95
|
|
|
|
Paypal - 19 x Otterbox Defender Case - Samsung Galaxy S6 Mobile
Phones - Rangers
|
$667.60
|
|
|
|
Paypal - 2 x IT Training Premium - Subscription (31.07.2015 to
30.07.2016)
|
$2,874.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Libraries September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Child Education Pty Ltd - Poetry Tree For Story Time
|
$51.89
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi - Local Stock Purchase
|
$858.44
|
|
|
|
Kmart - Purchase Of Local Stock, Hooks, Toys For It's All About
Play
|
$380.50
|
|
|
|
Officeworks - Counter Bell For Front Desk, Folders -
Resume Resource Packs
|
$148.49
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Purchase Of Water Refills For Yanchep Library
|
$43.20
|
|
|
|
WASLA - Training - Stephen Krashen "Power Of Reading"
.
|
$170.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Regulatory Services September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Better Pets And Gardens World - Cat Food & Dog Leads
|
$142.16
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hose Fittings And Floor Squeegee
|
$126.18
|
|
|
|
Caltex Star Shop NOR - Food For Volunteers
|
$372.74
|
|
|
|
Chippys Fish Cafe - Food For Volunteers
|
$221.60
|
|
|
|
Commercial Stationery - White Board Tape
|
$55.90
|
|
|
|
Duvas Wan - Food For Volunteers
|
$124.30
|
|
|
|
Grilld Ocean Keys - Food For Volunteers
|
$41.90
|
|
|
|
Lay Trading Pty Ltd - Food For Volunteers
|
$43.97
|
|
|
|
Masseurs On The Run - Training Course
|
$160.00
|
|
|
|
Milad Parwani And Mohamma - Food For Volunteers
|
$222.71
|
|
|
|
Officeworks - Desk Filing Draws
|
$50.88
|
|
|
|
The Oven Door Bakery Cafe - Food For Volunteers
|
$63.20
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Deli - Food For Volunteers
|
$34.20
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Pizza - Food For Volunteers
|
$696.00
|
|
|
|
Woolworths Carramar - Cat Food
|
$73.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - Building Maintenance September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware - Hardware
|
$1,256.29
|
|
|
|
Blyth Enterprises Pty Ltd - Hardware
|
$8.80
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware
|
$2,122.39
|
|
|
|
Calidad Industries - Hardware
|
$224.40
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire - Scissor Lift 19ft
|
$112.37
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Sawmills - Jarrah Dry Skip
|
$398.35
|
|
|
|
Masters - Hardware
|
$435.78
|
|
|
|
Officeworks 0607 - Deflecto 2Tier Burch Holder
|
$53.98
|
|
|
|
Solver Decorator Center - Paint Supplies
|
$1,013.19
|
|
|
|
Taubmans Trade Centre - Paint Supplies
|
$31.66
|
|
|
|
Toolmart Australia Pty Ltd - Hardware
|
$93.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flexipurchase - September 2015
|
$15,391.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchasing Cards Transactions
|
$27,822.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EFT's And Purchasing Cards
|
$11,467,018.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING
SCHEME
|
|
|
|
Cell 4
|
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim -
Legal fee - Compensation claim - Lots 1 & 8 Wanneroo Rd, Pearsall
|
$3,360.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 5
|
|
|
|
|
BG & E Pty Ltd - Engineering Consulting Services Lenore
Road Wanneroo
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers and Solicitors - Legal Fees - Lot 3 (No.359)
Gnangara Road
|
$2,819.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 8
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods
Barristers and Solicitors - Legal Fees - Lot 6 Gnangara Road
|
$2,819.60
|
|
|
|
BG & E Pty Ltd - Engineering Consulting Services Lenore
Road Wanneroo
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Sorensen Short
& Associates - Lot 514 Gnangara Road - Surveyor Service
|
$202.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell Berkley
|
|
|
|
|
Focus
Settlements - Acquisition of Land - Lot 29 McNamara Road Marangaroo
|
$206,764.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 9
|
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Property -
Finalisation of Contribution Arrangements
|
$131,740.00
|
|
|
|
Indoor Gardens -
Finalisation of Contribution Arrangements
|
$26,348.00
|
|
|
|
Kingfield -
Finalisation of Contribution Arrangements
|
$204,197.00
|
|
|
|
Riverside Developments
- Finalisation of Contribution Arrangements
|
$795,655.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TPS
|
$1,375,906.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED
PAYMENTS FROM PREVIOUS PERIODS
|
|
98652
|
23.07.2014
|
TLF Nominees Pty Ltd
|
-3,844.30
|
|
98620
|
23.07.2014
|
A Vujanovic
|
-19.00
|
|
98622
|
23.07.2014
|
V Falzon
|
-38.75
|
|
98619
|
23.07.2014
|
R Ahmedin
|
-14.33
|
|
98616
|
23.07.2014
|
J Wang
|
-132.50
|
|
98515
|
15.07.2014
|
S Brandis
|
-10.00
|
|
98227
|
23.06.2014
|
Swan Valley Egg Farm
|
-35.20
|
|
97770
|
27.05.2014
|
Mrs Lorna Laffrey & Mr Roger Laffrey
|
-106.87
|
|
2386-10742-01
|
25.10.2015
|
Regional Publishers Pty Ltd
|
-872.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cancelled Payments
|
-$5,073.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual Journals
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees
|
$2.50
|
|
|
|
Clicksuper
|
-$629,734.56
|
|
|
|
October Journal
|
-$622,136.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Journals
|
-$1,251,868.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund
Bank Account
|
|
|
|
Payroll Payments November 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
10.11.2015
|
$1,632,928.33
|
|
|
|
24.11.2015
|
$1,625,950.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Payroll
|
$3,258,878.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002422
|
26/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Line Fee
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee
|
$212.33
|
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee
|
$9,565.20
|
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee
|
$483.12
|
|
|
|
BPay Fee Debtors
|
$168.13
|
|
|
|
BPay Fee Rates
|
$8,101.50
|
|
|
|
BPoint Debtors
|
$43.87
|
|
|
|
BPoint Rates
|
$436.99
|
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee
|
$317.57
|
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee
|
$140.50
|
|
|
|
Account Service
Fee
|
$536.59
|
|
|
|
Payroll Return
Fees
|
$2.50
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Direct Debit Return Fees
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees
|
$20,148.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Hodges
|
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$8.50
|
|
|
|
Hospitality -
Interview - Manager Communications And Events
|
$162.70
|
|
|
|
Payment For Face
Book Adds - Communications And Events
|
$90.03
|
|
|
|
LGMA -
Attendance Of Outside The Box Event - 01.10.2015 - D Barr
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Jennings
|
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$71.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality -
Conference In Sydney - 07 - 09.10. 2015
|
$29.35
|
|
|
|
Air Fare Coffs
Harbour Return - T Evans - Conference - 16 - 21.11.2015
|
$838.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms
|
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$54.51
|
|
|
|
Hospitality -
Coffees For CEO's Of Outer Growth Councils On Bus Tour - 17.09.2015
|
$44.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Yildiz
|
|
|
|
|
Attendance Fee -
Intersector Breakfast Under One Roof - D Guise - 22.10.2015
|
$130.30
|
|
|
|
Air Fare -
Qantas - T Roberts - Return Sydney - 11.11.2015 -13.11.2015
|
$637.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Singh
|
|
|
|
|
Course
Attendance Fee - Administration Of Construction Contracts - A Scott - 24 -
25.11.2015
|
$1,320.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of
Practice Note 9
|
$286.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of
Article - Case Studies In Improving Design Criteria For Ocean Swimming Pools
|
$4.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of
Coles Myer Gift Cards - Charity Golf Day
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Clearing Permit
Payment - PR 2616 - Upgrade Neerabup Industrial Area Roads
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$24.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P St John
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of 2 Tickets -
Collaborative Regional Marketing - 09.10.2015
|
$143.00
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees
|
$10.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments
|
$4,204.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees And Credit Cards
|
$24,353.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup November 2015
|
$11,627,895.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit
Cards And Bank Fees)
|
$11,652,248.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund
|
$14,911,127.27
|
Attachments: Nil
CS02-12/15 Financial
Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2015
File Ref: 23374
– 15/542973
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period
ended 31 October 2015.
Background
In accordance with Local Government Regulations, the
Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the
following:
“1. Regulation
34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996,
which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity
each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business
unit. For the 2015/16 financial year Council will present the statement
of financial activity by nature and type.
2. Regulation
34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires
a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial
activity for reporting material variances. For the 2015/16 financial year
Council will use 10% for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
The Financial Activity Statement
and October 2015 year to date (YTD) financial performances of the City are
detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The figures within this report reflect the Revised Budget
where changes have been made.
Below is a table which highlights the financial activity for
the month of October 2015. Included in the table are the month’s revenues
and expenditures by category, with corresponding budgets and variances.
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(5) of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the
commentaries on 10% variances to budget in the Financial Activity Statement for
the period ended 31 October 2015 are provided below.
CURRENT MONTH
The month of October produced an overall net result of -15%
(-$1.147 million). Within operating revenues a positive variance (6%) has
been achieved mainly through higher interest earnings and other revenue income
categories.
Operating expenses also showed a positive variance (7%)
mainly through lower employee costs as well as interest expenses not being due.
Other revenue and expenses produced a negative variance
(-71%) which was a result of lower than expected Operating grants as well as
TPS revenues.
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Year to Date Net Result
The year to date net result presented a favourable result of
$5.304 million (+5%). Detail to the variances is outlined in the
corresponding sections below for Operating Revenues, Operating Expenses and
Other Revenue and Expenses.
The
following information is provided on key aspects of the YTD financial results:
Operating Revenues
The Year to October produced a
positive variance of $3.205 million (+2%) within operating revenues.
Further detail to the variance within each income category is provided below as
well as a bar graph illustrating the corresponding dollar amounts.
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions (Actual
$4.1 million, Revised Budget $3.4 million)
As at 31 October 2015 the YTD
variance for Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions was $0.703 million
(+21%). As in prior months the positive result derives from the receipt
of a Kidsport grant ($0.425 million) for the 2015/16 year in July. Whilst
the grant is budgeted on a monthly basis the entire amount was received in
July.
Another contributing factor to the increased positive
contributions is a main roads grant attributed to the Parks and Maintenance
service unit ($0.110 million) which has been received slightly earlier than
budgeted as well as a Department of Education grant ($0.212 million).
Fees and Charges (Actual $7.0 million, Revised Budget
$6.3 million)
Fees and Charges present a positive
variance of 10% ($0.655 million) to October. This is a result of rating
administration fee charge receipts have collected earlier than budgeted and
represents a positive variance of $0.351 million. Supplementary to this
in the month of October the City received higher application licence fee income
($0.274 million positive variance) particularly in building and development
assessment areas. Rubbish collection fee income is still producing a positive
variance ($0.364 million) as a result of income collected through the annual
rates. These amounts have been moderately offset by lower than expected
YTD engineering supervision income.
Interest Earnings (Actual $3.2 million, Revised Budget
$2.5 million)
The October YTD figures present a
positive variance of 30% ($0.749 million). As in September this is a
result of rates instalment interest receipts being received prior to the budget
($0.593 million). This income will align to budget in November when it
was originally budgeted for. Additional to this is a positive variance in
interest on non-payment penalties within rates ($0.111 million).
Other Income (Actual $0.360 million, Revised Budget
$0.227 million)
This
income category shows a positive year to date variance of 58% ($0.133
million). This is almost entirely attributed to a receipt by the City Growth
department ($0.118 million) which relates to DCP preparation costs in the
Alkimos/Eglington development.
Operating
Expenses
Operating Expenses to October show
a positive variance of $6.885 million. The above table highlights the
month, YTD and full budget results which are further expanded on in the below
section. As with operating revenue a bar graph is also included
illustrating the dollar expenditure categories.
Employee Costs (Actual $20.8 million, Revised Budget $23.1
million)
The year
to October produced a positive variance of 10% (+$2.233 million). This is
mainly attributed to lower than budgeted salary expenditure (+$1.122 million
variance) as well as lower than budgeted wage expenses (+$0.476 million
variance) which are both a result of vacant positions as well as enterprise
agreements yet to be finalised and realised. Another contributor to the
positive variance is training course fee expenditure (+$0.154 million).
These expenses can vary depending on month to month activity and therefore are
subject to variances throughout the year.
Materials and Contracts (Actual $12.7 million, Revised
Budget $16.9 million)
The
Materials and Contracts expense category reflect a YTD variance of +25%
($4.209 million). This is mainly attributed to Contract expenses
where a positive variance of +$3.243 million was attained. This variance
is derived from a number of areas, particularly park irrigation maintenance, park
equipment maintenance, bushland maintenance, residential road maintenance,
sports ground maintenance and drainage land maintenance. These expenses are
budgeted on a monthly basis as the contract requirements occur as and when
needed.
Refuse
removal expenses also produced a positive variance in October (+$0.574
million). This variance relates to domestic rubbish collection expenses
however being offset moderately through higher than budgeted expenditure in
bulk rubbish expenditure.
General
material expenses have produced a positive variance of +$0.462 million.
This category covers a large amount of expenses of which the largest
contributor to the variance was within park irrigation equipment expenditure
(+$0.096 million).
It is
also noted that software expenses produced an adverse YTD variance of -$0.538
million due to licences being renewed earlier than budgeted.
Utilities
(Actual $2.7 million, Revised Budget $2.8 million)
This
category of expense shows a positive YTD variance of $0.043 million
(+2%). Whilst the variance is minimal it is noted that within this
category of expenditure electricity expenses comprise 89% of the total
utilities YTD budget and are monitored closely on a monthly basis.
Interest Expenses (Actual $0.9 million, Revised Budget $1.2
million)
This
category of expense shows a positive YTD variance of $0.290 million (+24%) due
to part of the budgeted interest payment relating to the City’s $60.7
million loan with Western Australia Treasury Corporation is not being due as at
October month end.
Insurance (Actual $1.4 million, Revised Budget $1.5
million)
The
YTD result shows a positive variance of 7% (+$0.110 million). This is mainly a
result of general insurance premium expenses being lower than budgeted. To
October these premiums encapsulate the majority of the YTD variance (+$0.090
million).
Other Revenue and Expenses
Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies
and Contributions (Actual $2.9 million, Revised Budget $4.8 million)
At the end of October the income within this category was
$2.878 million which displays a variance of $-1.946 million (-40%). The main
contributor is the receipts of main roads grants. These grants are paid on a
project progression basis and thus are driven by works performed which varies
on a month to month basis. Non-operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
relate directly to the external funding towards capital projects.
TPS Revenues (Actual
$5.9 million, Revised Budget $6.4 million)
This category of income produced an
unfavourable variance to October of -8%
(-$0.516 million). This is attributed to lot sale contributions
across various cells being lower than budget. The cells with YTD adverse
variances are Cell 1 (-$0.628 million), Cell 2
(-$0.162 million), Cell 4 (-$0.077 million), Cell 5 (-$0.587 million), Cell 6
(-$0.980 million), Cell 7 (-$0.040 million), Cell 8 (-$0.198
million). Cell 9 however produced a favourable variance of +$1.924
million.
As with TPS expenses these categories of income do not
impact the City’s municipal operations.
TPS Expenses (Actual $0.219
million, Revised Budget $0.157 million)
TPS Expenses as at October month
end total $0.219 million which has produced an unfavourable variance of -40%
(-$0.063 million) YTD against budget. These expenditures relate to
specific costs and land purchases within the Scheme locations and have no impact
on municipal accounts.
Profit/Loss on Asset Disposals (Actual $0.327 million,
Revised Budget $2.6 million)
As at October month end the City
has a total of $0.327 million profit recorded in sales of assets. The income
reflects the sale of land proceeds distributed from the Tamala Park Regional
Council. Whilst the YTD variance is -$2.261 million (-87%) the nature and
timing of sale of assets cannot be determined with certainty, budgets may or
may not align on a monthly basis.
Contributions of
Physical Assets
Each year developers hand over
physical assets such as parklands, roads and pathways to the City, for its
ongoing management and control. It should be noted that variations on the
amounts of contributions of physical assets comparing to budget has no direct
impact to the City’s current financial year results, but can have a
significant impact on future servicing, maintenance and renewal costs needing
to be factored into the Long Term Financial Plan. The scale of the value
of assets handed over to the City in the past has generally aligned closely to
the % increase in the number of new Lots created during the financial
year.
Balance Sheet
(Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Works Program (Refer Attachment 5)
The current status of the Capital Works Program as of 31
October 2015 is summarised below by Program Category:-
To further expand on the capital works program information
above, key infrastructure projects are selected to be reported on, on a regular
basis, which are itemised on the Top Capital Projects attachment to this
report: (Refer to Attachment 5)
Annual 2014/2015 Capital Works Budget Variances Report
(Refer to Attachment 6)
In accordance with the requirement
of Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management)
Regulations 1996, the 2014/2015 Capital Works Material Variance Report is
included in Attachment 6 which provides specific commentaries on capital work
projects reflecting +/-10% (greater than $5,000 in value) variances to Revised
Budgets for the financial year ended 30 June 2015.
The related Regulation requires
local governments to compare year to date actual with year to date budget and
report the variances with commentaries to Council. However, as progress of
capital works projects vary throughout the year depending on a range of
factors, including factors outside of the City's control, it is appropriate to
report the variances on completed projects on an annual basis post financial
year end closing, to ensure variances are current and realistic.
Whilst it is recognised that actual
costs incurred may occasionally exceed the allocated budget, the City is
dedicated to ensuring that effective processes are in place to achieve an
appropriate level of financial management in accordance to the City's
Accounting Policy. This will be achieved through the ongoing monitoring
of each Capital Project by Responsible Officers and monthly internal reporting
on the status of works and costs.
As a comparison to the end of year report prepared for
2014/15 (below table referred) a considerable shift has been made in reducing
the number and value of projects exceeding a +/-10% variance. Emphasis is
now on improved project management for all capital projects, with the
introduction of the project management framework effective from 1 July 2015.
Investment Portfolio
Summary (Refer to Attachment 3)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996, the City only invests in the following
highly secured investments effective from 1 August 2012:
1. Deposits
with authorised deposit taking institutions and the Western Australian Treasury
Corporation for a term not exceeding 12 months;
2. Bonds
that are guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government or a State or Territory for
a term not exceeding three years; and
3. Australian
currency.
As at 31 October 2015, the City holds an investment
portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $346.317 million (Face Value).
Interest earnings were budgeted at 2.75% yield. For the financial YTD
ending October 2015, Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded
the bank bill index benchmark by 0.54% pa (2.97% pa vs. 2.43% pa).
Displayed below are graphical representations of the
portfolio performance and earnings:
Note: Interest Earnings = Interest on investments plus Rates
Instalment and Penalty Income.
Rate
Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4
represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the
movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and
capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
YEAR
TO DATE RESULT FROM OPERATIONS
Overall
Comment
The Result from Operations for the City to October month end
presents an overall favourable variance of $10.090 million (+12%) to YTD
budget. Operating Revenue presented a favourable variance to YTD budget
of $3.205 million (2%). Expenditures from Operations also present a
favourable variance to budget of $6.885 million (+12%) with the main
contributor being Materials and Contracts (+$4.209 million).
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4
of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Financial Management
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Executive Management Team
|
Manage
|
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this
report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate
risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to
improve the existing management systems.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and
4.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council
RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to
YTD Budget for the period ended 31 October 2015, consisting of:
1. 2015/16
Annual Adopted and Revised Budget;
2. October
2015 YTD Revised Budget;
3. October
2015 YTD Income and Expenditure;
4. October
2015 YTD Material Variance Notes; and
5. October
2015 YTD Net Current Assets.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
October Income Statement
|
15/546705
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
October Balance Sheet
|
15/546708
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
October Inv
|
15/546711
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
October Rate Setting Statement
|
15/546709
|
Minuted
|
|
5.
|
Top Capital Projects - October 2015
|
15/549300
|
Minuted
|
|
6.
|
EOY Capital Variance Report
|
15/535788
|
Minuted
|
CS03-12/15 Review
of Accounting Policy
File Ref: 5115
– 15/556335
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To review the City’s Accounting Policy (the Policy).
Background
This Policy was adopted by Council in 1999, with the
formation of the City of Wanneroo. There have been subsequent revisions, with
the last being adopted by Council in November 2014. The contents of this
Policy include the significant accounting policies, which are required to be
administrated and thoroughly monitored for compliance and accountability.
It is to be noted that the significant accounting policies will be incorporated
as Notes to both the Annual Financial Statements and Annual Budget which will
be made available to the public once adopted.
Detail
An accounting policy is significant if its application will
have a material effect on the presentation of the Annual Financial Statements,
Annual Budget or Long Term Financial Plan or if its omission is likely to
influence the decision of a user (internal or external) and/or general public
who rely on them.
This Policy contains a set of specific policies known as
“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to be used by the City
to prepare its 2014/15 Financial Statements. These include any methods,
measurement systems and procedures for presenting disclosures as required by
the Australian Accounting Standards (AAS or AASB).
AASB101 Presentation of
Financial Statements requires the City to use the summary of significant
accounting policies to disclose how the City prepared its annual financial
statements in order to assist users in making informed decisions.
To ensure the City accurately refers to any significant
accounting policies, it has engaged the services of LG Solutions who have
provided the City a model financial report for the 2014/15 annual financial
statements, which includes a summary of significant accounting policies.
This model financial report complies with the Local Government Act 1995 (the
Act) and the related regulations. It is noted that the model
financial report used differs to that used in previous years.
Section 2 of the Policy addresses Budget Variations.
To further clarify the guidance provided, the following paragraph is added to
this section:
“The same annual
percentage or value adopted as part of the Annual Budget, for the purpose of
reporting material variances for the monthly statement of financial activity,
will apply under this section.”
Consultation
The summary of significant
accounting policies contained in LG Solutions 2014/15 model financial report
was used as the foundation to develop this Policy to ensure it is in compliance
with the Act and the related regulations.
The City's external Auditors,
Grant Thornton were also consulted to ensure their support is received as this
Accounting Policy will form the majority part of Notes 1 of the City's Annual
Financial Statements for 2014/15.
The Policy was also distributed internally to the
City’s Directors, Managers and Coordinators for comment.
Implications (Financial, Human Resources)
The Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
is responsible for the financial management of the City and has delegated
authority to expend funds from the Municipal, any Reserve or Trust
Account. These responsibilities are delegated to the Director Corporate
Strategy and Performance, Operations Manager Business and Finance and Manager
Finance.
All staff is required to refer
to this policy and other relevant policies/management procedures/documents or
delegations to ensure the City is in compliance with the Act, the Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (the FM
Reg), all related legislations and regulations and AAS.
All staff is required to refer to the Finance unit for
advice and guidance prior to making important and/or material financial
management decisions to ensure compliance to legislation and the City's policies
and procedures in relation to financial management.
Comment
Due to the extensive amendments to the Policy, it is
recommended that the current policy be repealed and the proposed draft policy
be adopted. The proposed revised and current Accounting Policies can be
found in Attachments 1 and 2 respectively.
This report was presented to and discussed at the Council
Forum held on the 22 September 2015 and the Council Forum supported this report
to be presented to the Audit and Risk Committee for information and discussion.
The Review of Accounting Policy
report was subsequently presented to the Audit and Risk Committee meeting of 17
November 2015 (Item 4.4) for consideration. The Audit and Risk Committee
resolved "to RECOMMEND that Council ADOPTS the Proposed Revised
Accounting Policy as shown in Attachment 1."
The following extract from the Audit and Risk Committee
Terms of Reference is related to the Committee’s role in the review of
this policy:
"To review the report
prepared by the CEO on any actions taken in respect of any matters raised in
the report of the auditor and presenting the report to Council for adoption
prior to the end of the next financial year or six months after the last report
prepared by the auditor is received, whichever is the latest in time.
To review the local
government’s draft annual financial report, focusing on:
· accounting
policies and practices;
· changes
to accounting policies and practices;
· the
process used in making significant accounting estimates;
· significant
adjustments to the financial report (if any) arising from the audit process;
· compliance
with accounting standards and other reporting requirements; and
· significant
variances from prior years.
To consider and recommend
adoption of the annual financial report to Council, and to review any
significant changes that may arise subsequent to any such recommendation but
before the annual financial report is signed."
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 4(2) of the FM Reg provides that
where there is an inconsistency between a provision within the AAS and a
provision within the FM Reg, the regulations prevail to the
extent of the inconsistency.
Regulation 5A of the FM
Reg requires the City to comply with the AAS.
Regulation 34(5) of the FM
Reg states:
"Each financial year, a local
government is to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with
AAS, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material
variances”.
Section 5(1) and (2) of the
FM Reg govern the CEO's duties as to financial management:
"5
CEO’s duties as to financial management
(1) Efficient systems and procedures are to be
established by the CEO of a local government-
(a) for the proper collection of all money owing to the
local government; and
(b) for the safe custody and security of all money
collected or held by the local government; and
(c) for the proper maintenance and security of the
financial records of the local government (whether maintained in written form
or by electronic or other means or process); and
(d) to ensure proper accounting for municipal or trust
—
(i) revenue received or receivable; and
(ii) expenses paid or payable; and
(iii) assets and liabilities;
and
(e) to ensure proper authorisation for the incurring of
liabilities and the making of payments; and
(f) for the maintenance of payroll, stock control
and costing records; and
(g) to assist in the preparation of budgets, budget
reviews, accounts and reports required by the Act or these regulations.
(2) The CEO is to —
(a) ensure that the resources of the local government are
effectively and efficiently managed; and
(b) assist the council to undertake reviews of fees and
charges regularly (and not less than once in every financial year); and
(c) undertake reviews of the appropriateness and
effectiveness of the financial management systems and procedures of the local
government regularly (and not less than once in every 4 financial years) and
report to the local government the results of those reviews."
Section 6.5 Of the Division 4
– General financial provisions of the Act states the following
financial responsibilities of the CEO:
"6.5
Accounts and records
The CEO has
a duty —
(a) to ensure that there are kept, in
accordance with regulations, proper accounts and records of the transactions
and affairs of the local government; and
(b) to
keep the accounts and records up to date and ready for inspection at any time
by persons authorised to do so under this Act or another written law."
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Financial Management
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Executive Management Team
|
Manage
|
The new Accounting Policy has
incorporated all the significant changes either from the Act, FM
Reg, relevant legislations or applicable AAS which will have a material
effect on the presentation of the Annual Financial Statements, Annual Budget or
Long Term Financial Plan. If it is not adopted, the City will be exposed
to reputation, financial and/or compliance risks.
Policy
Implications
The guiding principle of this Accounting Policy is to
provide a financial management and financial governance framework for the City
as a legal entity, hence management and compliance with this policy is a
collective responsibility of all persons engaged by the City or closely associated
with the City in any capacity.
Financial
Implications
Financial management is an important responsibility of the
CEO in a local government in accordance to the Act and the related
regulations. Financial management is a broad issue and hence the
formation of a sound and compliant Accounting policy will provide solid
guidance to all City staff. The application of this Accounting Policy
will help to ensure the long term financial sustainability of the City.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council, on the recommendation of Audit and Risk
Committee, ADOPTS the Proposed Revised Accounting Policy as shown in
Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Proposed Revised Accounting Policy September 2015
|
15/470391
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Accounting Policy
|
14/289534[v1]
|
|
CS04-12/15 Audited
Annual Financial Statements for the Period Ended 30 June 2015
File Ref: 23374
– 15/556355
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To
consider the Audit and Risk Committee's recommendation to Council to adopt the
City's draft Annual Audited Financial Report (the Report) for the
year ended 30 June 2015, audited by the City’s Auditors, Grant Thornton
Audit Pty Ltd (Grant Thornton).
Background
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 a
local government is required to prepare an annual financial report on its
operations for the preceding financial year by 30 September and submit the
report to its Auditors.
The City submitted its draft Annual Financial Report to its
Auditors, Grant Thornton prior to 30 September 2015 and they have completed
their audit and issued the Report for the year ended 30 June 2015.
Detail
The Statement by Chief Executive Officer, the Report and the
Independent Auditor’s Report are detailed in Attachment 1.
In the Independent Auditor’s Report to the ratepayers
of the City of Wanneroo, Grant Thornton expressed their opinion that the
financial report of the City of Wanneroo:
(i) gives a
true and fair view of the City of Wanneroo’s financial position as at 30
June 2015 and of its performance for the financial year ended 30 June 2015;
(ii) complies
with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting
Interpretations); and
(iii) is
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act
1995 Part 6 (as amended) and Regulations under that Act.
The Auditors did not consider it necessary to issue a
Management Report to accompany the Auditor's report.
Consultation
The Report was presented to the Audit & Risk Committee
held on 17 November 2015, it was resolved that the Committee:
“1. RECOMMENDS
the CEO to sign the “Statement by Chief Executive Officer” (page
3 of Attachment 1), as required by the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996 Regulation 51; and
2. RECOMMENDS
that Council ADOPTS the draft Annual Audited Financial Report for the City of
Wanneroo for the year ended 30 June 2015 as detailed in Attachment 1.”
Comment
It should be noted that within the context of the Report,
actual results are compared with the original adopted budget and not the
revised budget adopted by Council. The Budget document is an evolving
document that changes throughout the year as circumstances in the City of
Wanneroo change. The changes are recognised and recorded through the
process of the Budget reviews approved by Council and the updated Budget is
referred to as the Revised Budget. A monthly financial activity statement
is provided to Council explaining the year to date budget variances using the
Revised Budgets as comparison.
Significant Item
The most significant audit issue for the year is considered
to be the Fair Value Revaluation of the City's Infrastructure Assets which has
reflected $404.1 million under Other Comprehensive Income – Changes on
Revaluation of Non-Current Assets. The City's total assets have, as a
consequence of the revaluation, increased from $1.853 billion to
$2.365 billion.
The following commentary is provided to highlight the most
critical financial information and to acknowledge areas of financial interest,
achievement or concern.
1. Operating
Revenue
Operating Revenue for 2015 reflects a 6.2% increase over
2014. The largest contributor by value is Rates which accounts for 72%
and grew by 8.2%, which exceeded the budget due to additional growth. To
provide a visual presentation of the comparative results for each income
category the graph below displays figures for the previous 3 years and the
Adopted Budget for 2015/16.
2. Operating
Expenses
Operating Expenses for 2015 increased by 6.5% over that
recorded for 2014. With Employee Costs having the largest influence on
Operating Expenses, it is noted that this category presented a 5.9% increase
over the previous year, due to increases in staffing resources, collective
agreement pay rates and entitlements. The second most substantial
category is Contracts & Materials which recorded a 3.0% decrease over 2014
results.
To further illustrate the breakdown and increases in
Operating Expense categories, the graph below presents the results for each
area over the previous 3 years and the following year’s Adopted Budget.
3. Result
from Operations
When considering financial sustainability one of the key
measures referred to is the Result from Operations, which is calculated by
taking Operating Expenses from Operating Revenues. Provided in the table
below is reference to past year results.
4. Capital
Expenditure
Historically the City has been required to undertake
significant capital works programs to accommodate the substantial growth
occurring within its municipality. For 2015 a program equating to $87.7
million was originally budgeted for, which was subsequently revised to $74.7
million due mainly to delays in several large infrastructure projects.
The net capital expenditure for 2015 amounts to $52.9 million, with significant
projects including but not limited to: Lenore Road ($5.0 million), Flynn Drive
($2.0 million), Koondoola Multicultural Centre ($1.5 million), Plant
Replacement ($1.1 million), Truck Replacement ($1.6 million) and $1.1 million
for retaining walls at Opportunity Street Wangara.
5. Rate
Setting Statement
To best appreciate the City's overall underlying funding
capacity a Rate Setting Statement (Page 10 of Attachment 1) is prepared,
which brings together all operating accounts, capital expenditures, funding
transfers and adjustments for non-cash revenues and expenditures, with the
resulting bottom line indicating the amount required to be raised from
Rates. Whilst the Budget will generally reflect a balanced position, in
accordance to the City's Financial (Cash Backed) Reserves Management Procedure,
any unallocated surplus identified at the end of the year (after allowing for
municipal funding toward carry forward capital projects) is transferred to the
Strategic Projects/Initiatives Reserve.
6. Reserve
Balances
To ensure the effective management of municipal funds the
City has a number of reserve accounts created for specific purposes.
These funds are systematically invested to maximise their use until required,
as identified in the Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP). Indicated below are
the total balances of Reserves recorded to account for the previous 3 financial
years and budget for 2015/16 (Note 12 of Attachment 1).
Whilst the 2014/15 Budget provided for a net outflow from
Reserves of $11.9 million to meet operational and capital project funding
requirements, an improvement in the end of year operating results, capital
expenditure delays and better than anticipated land sales proceeds from Tamala
Park Regional Council (TPRC) resulted in a net inflow to Reserves of
$32.7 million. Material improvements include:
|
Reserve
|
End Of Year Balance
|
Comment/Reason
|
|
|
Actual $
|
Budget $
|
|
|
Alkimos/Eglinton CCFR
|
8,393,577
|
5,118,559
|
Higher development
contributions
|
|
Domestic Refuse
|
5,343,797
|
3,321,182
|
Capital expenditure delayed
|
|
Plant Replacement
|
3,562,426
|
150,299
|
Plant replacement delayed
|
|
Neerabup Development
|
5,645,389
|
1,238,539
|
Capital expenditure delayed
|
|
Strategic Projects/Initiatives
|
81,160,162
|
54,280,144
|
Improved result from
operations
|
7. Ratios
Each year a number of financial ratios are prepared as part
of the statements, to help further analyse financial results. The City has
maintained positive results across most ratios. In 2015 the Current
Ratio, Asset Renewal Funding Ratio and the Asset Sustainability Ratio however
fell below the benchmark.
A description of the purpose of each ratio and explanation
for variations is provided below:
Ratio Description (Local Government
Operational Guidelines – Number 18)
Current Ratio This
is a modified commercial ratio designed to focus on the liquidity position of a
local government that has arisen from past year's transaction.
Debt Service This
ratio is the measurement of a local government's ability to repay its debt
including lease payments. The higher the ratio is, the easier it is for a
local government to obtain a loan.
Operating Surplus This
ratio is a measure of a local government's ability to cover its operational
costs and have revenues available for capital funding or other purposes.
Asset Sustainability This
ratio indicates whether a local government is replacing or renewing existing
non-financial assets at the same ratio that its overall asset stock is wearing
out.
Own Source This
ratio is the measurement of a local government's ability to cover its costs
through its own revenue efforts.
Asset Consumption This
ratio measures the extent to which depreciable assets have been consumed by
comparing their written down value to their replacement cost.
Asset Renewal Funding This
ratio is a measure of the ability of a local government to fund its projected
asset renewal/replacements in the future.
Specific Ratio Result Explanations
Current Ratio Standard
has not been met as the Ratio is less than 1:1, primarily as a result of the
restriction of the rate setting unallocated surplus to Strategic
Projects/Initiatives Reserve and unspent municipal funds relating to carried
forward capital works to a restricted reserve.
Debt Service An
Advanced Standard has been met as the Ratio is greater than 5, however the
ratio does not take into account 'interest only' loans, in circumstances where
the Principal is to be repaid in a future year. The City does have a plan
for the accumulation of funds for the repayment of the $60.78 million loan in 2026.
Operating Surplus An
Advanced Standard has been met as the Ratio is greater than 15% (0.15).
Asset Sustainability Technically,
the Standard has not been met as the Ratio is less than 90% (0.90). See
detailed response below.
Own Source An
Advanced Standard has been achieved as the Ratio is greater than 90% (0.90).
Asset Consumption The
Standard has been met as it exceeds the 50% target and exceeds the Department's
'improving' Standard which is between 60% and 75%.
Asset Renewal Funding The
Standard has slightly not been met as the Ratio is 0.01% below the 75%
target.
Asset
Sustainability Ratio
Section 9 of the
City's current LTFP addresses the area of Asset Management. In that
section, the following commentary is provided specifically in respect to the Asset
Sustainability Ratio (ASR):
The DLG's Asset Management
Framework and Guidelines publication provides the following explanation in
respect to the ASR:
"If capital expenditure on renewing or
replacing assets is at least equal to depreciation on average over time, then
the local government is ensuring the value of its existing stock of physical
assets is maintained. If capital expenditure on existing assets is less than
depreciation then, unless a local government’s overall asset stock is
relatively new, it is likely that it is underspending on renewal or
replacement."
A large percentage of the City's
assets are in new to very good condition with approximately 85% of the total
asset base at or below condition 2 (a rating of 0 represents a new asset and 10
being assets that are failing). Less than 1% of the asset base is at or
above condition 8, which represents assets that require immediate attention.
With the City's current mix of
old and new assets and continued high growth, a lower than average ASR is essentially
unavoidable, and the current condition of assets and level of renewal
expenditure confirms this position. However as the stock ages and renewal
expenditure incrementally increases the ratio should increase.
Taking a long term outlook, the
level of asset stock and renewal demand necessitates the development of
strategies to address the future impact and ensure that the City can continue
to grow and maintain its assets in a financially sustainable manner.
Whilst the biggest impact is
beyond the current 10 year period and potentially the next, it is clear that
steps need to be initiated within the term of the current LTFP. Given
that renewal expenditure is lower than the depreciation being charged and that
certain years will experience significant spikes in demand, it is considered
that a specific Asset Renewal Reserve is an appropriate facility to be
established. Accordingly, the draft updated LTFP proposes the
establishment of the Reserve and provides for the allocation of funds from year
2017/18 onwards.
8. Governance
Expense
When accounting for local government activities, in addition
to the preparation of financial reports by Nature and Type, Program categories
are also used to assist in the consistent presentation of financial information.
This allows readers to compare results between categories and furthermore
against other councils. The following graph reflects the percentage of
expenditure for the Governance Program category alongside those calculated for
neighbouring councils and the City of Perth.
Summary
As demonstrated by the financial data available for each of
the key indicators above, the 2015 financial results for the City present a
strong and sustainable financial position, recognising the City's strong focus
placed on effective and efficient financial management.
Statutory
Compliance
Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996
regulation 36 specifies the information that is to be included in the Annual
Financial Report.
The Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996
prescribes the following compliance matters in respect to the Audit Report.
"10. Report by auditor
(1) An
auditor’s report is to be forwarded to the persons specified in
section 7.9(1) within 30 days of completing the audit.
(2) The report is to
give the auditor’s opinion on —
(a) the
financial position of the local government; and
(b) the
results of the operations of the local government.
(3) The report is to
include —
(a) any
material matters that in the opinion of the auditor indicate significant
adverse trends in the financial position or the financial management practices
of the local government; and
(b) any
matters indicating non‑compliance with Part 6 of the Act, the Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 or applicable financial
controls in any other written law; and
(c) details
of whether information and explanations were obtained by the auditor; and
(d) a
report on the conduct of the audit; and
(e) the opinion
of the auditor as to whether or not the following financial ratios included in
the annual financial report are supported by verifiable information and
reasonable assumptions-
(i)
the asset consumption ratio; and
(ii) the
asset renewal funding ratio.
(4) Where it is
considered by the auditor to be appropriate to do so, the auditor is to prepare
a management report to accompany the auditor’s report and to forward a
copy of the management report to the persons specified in section 7.9(1)
with the auditor’s report."
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
As detailed in the draft Report.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That
Council:
1. ADOPTS
the draft Annual Audited Financial Report for the City of Wanneroo for the year
ended 30 June 2015 as detailed in Attachment 1 as recommended by the Audit and
Risk Committee; and
2. ADOPTS
the Independent Auditor's Report from Grant Thornton as detailed in Attachment
1.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Annual Financial Statements as at 30 June 2015
|
15/524701
|
Minuted
|
Governance and Legal
CS05-12/15 Annual
Report 2014/15
File Ref: 21685
– 15/549394
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the Annual Report 2014/15.
Background
Section 5.53(1) of the Local Government Act 1995 (the
Act) requires local governments to develop and publish an annual report for
each financial year with the required content of the report specified in
section 5.53(2).
Section 5.54 of the Act requires that the local government
accept the annual report for a financial year no later than 31 December after
that financial year; the exception being that if the Auditor’s report is
not available in time for the annual report for a financial year to be accepted
by 31 December after that financial year, the annual report is to be
accepted by the local government no later than 2 months after the
Auditor’s report becomes available.
Detail
The Annual Report provides a
comprehensive account of the City’s activities throughout 2014/2015 (Attachment
1). The Report outlines the progress made towards the strategic
objectives set out in the City’s Strategic Community Plan (2013-2023),
and details performance against the commitments made in the Corporate Business
Plan (2014/2015 - 2017/2018).
The City is striving to improve the quality of
reporting. The content of this Annual Report has changed quite
significantly from previous years; previously it was developed as more of a
compliance-driven document with only the necessary information included. The
Annual Report will be published in both print format and electronically in an
interactive format. The digital format provides a much more engaging
experience and allows users to drill down into areas of interest. A
shortened version of the Annual Report will also be made available.
This Annual Report was developed through benchmarking
with award winning annual reports as well as using the Australasian Report
Awards (ARA) criteria. The cities of Stirling, Kingston, Darwin, Glen
Eira, Boroondarra were benchmarked against as they have received gold awards as
well as special awards namely in the categories of:
· best
summary;
· financial
overview;
· governance;
· best
sustainability reporting;
· best
performance reporting;
· communication
· online
report.
To address the ARA criteria, the 2014/15 Annual Report now
includes:
· Highlights,
challenges and a look ahead.
· Service
delivery and financial health overview.
· OUR
CITY: information about the City’s profile, history, suburbs, demographic
population and our services.
· OUR
COUNCIL: information about Elected Members and how we connect with our
community (customer service, communication, community engagement, economic
development).
· OUR
ORGANISATION: information about the Executive Management Team, employees,
awards and recognition, volunteers and external grants and funding.
· OUR
PERFORMANCE: information about the City’s integrated planning framework
that includes performance on the Strategic Community Plan (SCP) and the
Corporate Business Plan.
· GOVERNANCE:
information about Council Governance and Corporate Governance.
· Statutory
information
· Financial
Report and Financial Statement
The ARA provides an opportunity for the City to benchmark
its report against the ARA criteria; the Awards consider Annual Reports from
across the globe, with the purpose being to improve the standards and quality
of financial and business reporting.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Most of the information contained in the Annual Report has
been previously submitted to either Audit and Risk Committee or Council during
the financial year. The table below is an outline of the table of
contents and indicates the applicable approvals and reporting processes.
|
Table of contents
|
Page numbers
|
Approval
process/meetings
|
|
Message of the Mayor
|
4-6
|
Approved by the Mayor
on Monday 30 November 2015.
|
|
Message of the CEO
|
6-8
|
Approved by the CEO on
26 November 2015.
|
|
Introduction
|
8-9
|
This includes the
City’s Vision and Values.
|
|
Our City
|
9-13
|
City profile summary.
|
|
The Year in Review
(financial health, looking ahead, service delivery overview, external awards)
|
14-29
|
The financial health
overview is a summary of the audited financials that was submitted to Council
on 17 November 2015.
The ratios in the
financial overview are a copy of the audited financials but in a graphical
format. This financial overview section was verified against the final
version of the Audited Financials and reviewed by Executive and senior staff.
The very first table
(Results overview) on page 14 has been amended after the briefing session
held on 1 December 2015.
|
|
Governance (Demographic
and Corporate)
|
29-49
|
This section includes a
summary of the Mayor and Councillors roles and responsibilities as well as detail
of the compliance services.
The table on page 33
(Council meeting attendance during 2014/15 financial year) has been amended
after the briefing session held on 1 December 2015.
Table on page 35
(Committee and working groups) has been amended after the briefing session on
1 December 2015.
|
|
Our Organisation
|
50 - 58
|
Summary of the
Administration.
The table on page 53
has been on 4 December 2015 following the Briefing session held on 1 December
2015.
|
|
Our Performance
|
59 - 107
|
This section was submitted
to Audit and Risk Committee on 22 September 2015 as the Year End Corporate
Performance Report.
The Community
Satisfaction Survey Results were submitted to Council during the financial
year.
The only additional
sections are:
·
Statistical information within each Pillar
·
Challenges within each Pillar
·
Looking ahead within each Pillar
·
SCP measures within each Pillar
·
Service KPIs within each Pillar
The tables on page 74
(CBP status), 80 (Service Key Performance Indicator) and 81 (CBP Operational
Actions) and narratives on page 94, 105 and 114 have been amended after the
briefing session held on 1 December 2015.
|
|
Additional Statutory
Information
|
119 - 123
|
Legislative reporting
requirement.
|
|
Financial Report
|
124
|
Copy of the Audited
Financial Statements attached as an annexure.
The statements were
submitted to Audit and Risk Committee on 17 November 2015.
Changes were requested
and Final version will be attached to the Annual Report.
|
Statutory
Compliance
Section 5.55 of the Act requires that Council give local
public notice of the availability of the Annual Report once adopted by
Council. This will be carried out via advertisements in newspapers, the
City's website and notices placed on Council’s Public Notice Boards.
Section 5.27 of the Act states
that a General Meeting of the Electors (AGM) is to be held once every financial
year and not more than 56 days after the local government accepts the Annual
Report.
The AGM is proposed for Wednesday, 27 January 2016 which
will ensure that the Annual Report complies with section 5.27 of the Act which
requires the report to be submitted to an AGM 49 days after Council adoption.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
Nil
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the Annual Report 2014/15 as
shown in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Annual Report 2014/15
|
15/568266
|
Minuted
|
CS06-12/15 Donations
to be Considered by Council - December 2015
File Ref: 2855V02
– 15/549192
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver
of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver
of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications
over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by
Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding
with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy
specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per
individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount
provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools
are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received seven sponsorship
requests, one community donation request and one request for a waiver of fees
and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications
are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Girrawheen Senior High
School
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Jennina Cruz; Sherryn McCluskey; Faith Rowell;
Ashleigh Gibson-French; Travis Davey-McPeak; Salina Tairoski; Yohanna Awdo;
Awdo Awdo; Loan Pham; Dionne Mudra; Van Tha Ratin; and Peter Thatmun
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
AASCF National Championships, Melbourne Vic, 28
– 29 November 2015
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Policy Item 5.4, selection of
individuals by schools are subject to the following criteria:- Funding will
be to a maximum of $2,000.00 per school, per financial year to support
students attending events.
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$2,000.00 to Girrawheen Senior High School for the
participation of Jennina Cruz; Sherryn McCluskey; Faith Rowell;
Ashleigh Gibson-French; Travis Davey-McPeak; Salina Tairoski; Yohanna Awdo;
Awdo Awdo; Loan Pham; Dionne Mudra; Van Tha Ratin and Peter Thatmun at
the AASCF National Championships to be held in Melbourne Vic
from 28 – 29 November 2015.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 2 – West Australian Indoor
Netball Association
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
12’s Ladies Team – Zaire Apiata; Alyssa
Bester; Latoya Chase; Tamira Metuangaro; Jayda Moore; Jade Sadler
14’s Ladies Team – Grace Moran; Cassidy
Smith
16’s Ladies Team – Katarina Campbell;
Imogen Resta; Neve Simon
16’s Mixed Team – Egypt Apiata; Olivia
Bell; Marsha Oosthuizen; Delaney Smith; Jordan Townsend
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Australian Junior Indoor Netball, Salisbury SA, 4
– 14 December 2015
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with the Policy, $200 per individual
(capped at $600 per team, up to four teams).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$2,200.00 to West Australian Indoor Netball Association for the
participation of 12’s Ladies Team – Zaire Apiata; Alyssa
Bester; Latoya Chase; Tamira Metuangaro; Jayda Moore and Jade Sadler;
14’s Ladies Team – Grace Moran and Cassidy Smith; 16’s
Ladies Team – Katarina Campbell; Imogen Resta and Neve Simon;
16’s Mixed Team – Egypt Apiata; Olivia Bell; Marsha Oosthuizen;
Delaney Smith and Jordan Townsend to be held in Adelaide SA from 4
– 14 December 2015.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 3 – Greenwood College
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Sam Burrell; Gavin Anderson; Taylah Smith and Mayghan
Venables
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Australian Volleyball Schools Cup, Melbourne Vic, 4
– 12 December 2015
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Policy Item 5.4, selection of
individuals by schools are subject to the following criteria:- Funding will
be to a maximum of $2,000.00 per school, per financial year to support
students attending events.
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$800.00 to Greenwood College for the participation of Sam
Burrell; Gavin Anderson; Taylah Smith and Mayghan Venables at the Australian
Volleyball Schools Cup to be held in Melbourne Vic from 4 – 12 December
2015.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 4 – Belridge Secondary College
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Liam Carroll; Nikhil Eraman; Scott Flannery; Brendon
Lan; Callum Morell; Oran Pattison; Kyle Whitehurst; Paul Gregg; Cory Griffin;
Thomas Pickles and Jaycob Yik
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Belridge SC United Kingdom Cricket Tour 2016, London
UK, 29 June to 14 July 2016
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
International
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Policy Item 5.4, selection of
individuals by schools are subject to the following criteria:- Funding will
be to a maximum of $2,000.00 per school, per financial year to support
students attending events.
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$2,000.00 to Belridge Secondary College for the participation
of Liam Carroll; Nikhil Eraman; Scott Flannery; Brendon Lan; Callum Morell;
Oran Pattison; Kyle Whitehurst; Paul Gregg; Cory Griffin; Thomas Pickles and
Jaycob Yik at the Belridge SC United Kingdom Cricket Tour 2016 to be held in
London UK from 29 June to 14 July 2016.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 5 – High Flyers Trampoline and
Gymnastics Academy
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Jack Petrie and Connor Dique
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
24th Trampoline Gymnastics World Age Group
Competition 2015, Odense Denmark, 3 – 5 December 2015
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
International
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Policy $500 per individual (capped
at $1,500 per team)
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$1,000.00 to High Flyers Trampoline and Gymnastics Academy for the participation
of Jack Petrie and Connor Dique at the 24th Trampoline Gymnastics World Age
Group Competition 2015 to be held in Odense, Denmark from 3 – 5
December 2015.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 6 – Perth Kiwi Magic
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Emysen Robinson; Shadae Walley; Ritihia Dunn; Tahlia
Winiata and Iesha Parry
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
International Netball Festival, Gold Coast Qld, 20
– 26 April 2016
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with the Policy, $200 per individual
(capped at $600 per team, up to four teams).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$600.00 to Perth Kiwi Magic for the participation of Emysen Robinson;
Shadae Walley; Ritihia Dunn; Tahlia Winiata and Iesha Parry at
the International Netball Festival to be held in Gold Coast, Qld from 20
– 26 April 2016.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
|
Applicant 7 – Ashdale Secondary College
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Tatum Adams; Taylor Dickson; Jasmin Dodd; Anna Duong;
Andie Eaton; Matilda Green; Albina Komadaric; Tylah Brown; Madison McGhie;
Alicia Spatara; Ellie Williams and Kayla Ziegler.
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Gold Coast Netball Carnival, Southport Qld, 9 –
17 July 2016
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
National
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Policy Item 5.4, selection of
individuals by schools are subject to the following criteria:- Funding will
be to a maximum of $2,000.00 per school, per financial year to support
students attending events.
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$2,000.00 to Ashdale Secondary College for the participation of
Tatum Adams; Taylor Dickson; Jasmin Dodd; Anna Duong; Andie Eaton;
Matilda Green; Albina Komadaric; Tylah Brown; Madison McGhie; Alicia Spatara;
Ellie Williams and Kayla Ziegler at the Gold Coast Netball
Carnival to be held in Southport Qld from 9 – 17 July 2016.
|
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
Community
Group Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Landsdale Community
Wesleyan Methodist Church
|
|
Request amount
|
$1624.00
|
|
Description of request
|
100% waiver of the bond, facility hire and bin hire at
Warradale Hall and Park, plus electrician and St John Ambulance costs in
order to run the Landsdale Community Carols in the Park to be held on 11
December 2015.
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Nil
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Registered Charity
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to all members of the public
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies,
values and strategic direction
|
2.2 – Healthy and active people – We
get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a
healthy lifestyle
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
$1,680.00
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
Volunteer time
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
CD02-05/12 $800.00
CD03-04/13 $1,406.00
CD05-05/14 $796.80
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Comments
|
This event has previously been supported through the
March Community Funding Round but they did not apply in time for this
year. This group already receives a 50% waiver of fees as it is a
registered charity. The costs they currently owe to the City are $830.00
for the bond; $222.00 facility hire fee and $105 for bin hire.
Additionally, they have requested $150 for an electrician and $200 for
attendance by St John Ambulance (see Attachment 1). This comes
to $1,507.00 and they are requesting $1,624.00. The Policy does not
support a 100% waiver of fees and Item 2.2 states Council will not consider
funding applications for “The bond associated with the use of
Council Facilities”.
|
|
Recommendation
|
NOT APPROVE a donation in the sum of $1,624.00 to
Landsdale Community Wesleyan Methodist Church towards a 100% waiver of the
bond, facility hire and bin hire at Warradale Hall and Park, plus electrician
and St John Ambulance costs in order to run the Landsdale Community Carols in
the Park to be held on 11 December 2015.
|
|
Reason
|
This request is not in accordance with
Council’s Policy.
|
|
Applicant 2 – One Church Perth
|
|
Request amount
|
$3,362.50
|
|
Description of request
|
Donation in the sum of $3,362.50 to cover food costs
to support the Wanneroo Christmas Lunch to be held at the Margaret Cockman
Pavilion on 25 December 2015.
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Nil
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Registered Charity
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to the community
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies,
values and strategic direction
|
2.2 – Healthy and active people – We
get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a
healthy lifestyle
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
$9,000.00
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
$6,000.00 in kind volunteer contribution
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
CD03-08/14 - $3,870.50 - Christmas Event 25
December 2014
CS03-09/15 - $450.00 – Wanneroo Christmas Lunch
25 December 2015
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Comments
|
In 2014 the group were awarded an
“out-of-round” donation of $3,000 for this event and $870.50 for
bin and venue hire as they were not ready to submit their request through the
Community Funding Program.
In September 2015 the group were awarded an amount of
$450 for a 50% waiver of fees and bin hire for this event which is the
subject of this current donation request.
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and
Charges Policy states Council will not consider funding for more than one
application per financial year, including funding through the Community
Funding Donation round. However, due to a changeover within the
Committee the application submitted in September was incomplete as it did not
include the request for a donation towards the food costs, therefore this can
be treated as one application.
The CEO has indicated there is a budget amount set
aside for this event in 717151-9399-316 – (Manage Directorate - Office
Chief Executive - General Expenditure / Contribution Donation Sponsorship
Expenses).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a donation in the sum of $3,362.50 to One
Church Perth to cover food costs for the Wanneroo Christmas Lunch to be held
at the Margaret Cockman Pavilion on 25 December 2015 noting that funding for
this donation will be from account GL 717633-1205-316.
|
|
Reason
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s
Policy.
|
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy
and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many
opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There is no existing Strategic or Corporate Risk within
the City’s existing risk registers which relates to the issue contained
within this report.
Policy
Implications
The Policy states that sponsorship applications for
attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four
teams) and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International
events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per
school per financial year.
Financial
Implications
|
Budget 2015/2016
|
|
$90,000.00
|
|
Amount expended to date (as at 20 November 2015)
|
|
$46,078.80
|
|
Balance
|
|
$43,921.20
|
|
Total of requests for this round:
Donations (in this report):
Total this Round (recommended)
|
$12,224.00
|
$10,600.00
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
$33,321.20
|
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $2,000.00 to Girrawheen Senior
High School for the participation of Jennina Cruz; Sherryn
McCluskey; Faith Rowell; Ashleigh Gibson-French; Travis Davey-McPeak; Salina
Tairoski; Yohanna Awdo; Awdo Awdo; Loan Pham; Dionne Mudra; Van Tha Ratin and
Peter Thatmun at the AASCF National Championships to be
held in Melbourne Vic from 28 – 29 November 2015;
2. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $2,200.00 to West Australian
Indoor Netball Association for the participation of 12’s
Ladies Team – Zaire Apiata; Alyssa Bester; Latoya Chase; Tamira
Metuangaro; Jayda Moore and Jade Sadler; 14’s Ladies Team –
Grace Moran and Cassidy Smith; 16’s Ladies Team – Katarina
Campbell; Imogen Resta and Neve Simon; 16’s Mixed Team – Egypt
Apiata; Olivia Bell; Marsha Oosthuizen; Delaney Smith and Jordan Townsend to
be held in Adelaide SA from 4 – 14 December 2015;
3. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $800.00 to Greenwood College
for the participation of Sam Burrell; Gavin Anderson; Taylah Smith and Mayghan
Venables at the Australian Volleyball Schools Cup to be held in Melbourne Vic
from 4 – 12 December 2015;
4. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $2,000.00 to Belridge Secondary
College for the participation of Liam Carroll; Nikhil Eraman;
Scott Flannery; Brendon Lan; Callum Morell; Oran Pattison; Kyle
Whitehurst; Paul Gregg; Cory Griffin; Thomas Pickles and Jaycob Yik at the
Belridge SC United Kingdom Cricket Tour 2016 to be held in London UK from
29 June to 14 July 2016;
5. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to High Flyers Trampoline and
Gymnastics Academy for the participation of Jack Petrie and Connor Dique at the
24th Trampoline Gymnastics World Age Group Competition 2015 to be held in
Odense, Denmark from 3 – 5 December 2015;
6. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Perth Kiwi Magic for the
participation of Emysen Robinson; Shadae Walley; Ritihia Dunn;
Tahlia Winiata and Iesha Parry at the International Netball
Festival to be held in Gold Coast, Qld from 20 – 26 April 2016;
7. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $2,000.00 to Ashdale Secondary
College for the participation of Tatum Adams; Taylor Dickson;
Jasmin Dodd; Anna Duong; Andie Eaton; Matilda Green; Albina Komadaric; Tylah
Brown; Madison McGhie; Alicia Spatara; Ellie Williams and Kayla Ziegler at
the Gold Coast Netball Carnival to be held in Southport Qld from
9 – 17 July 2016;
8. NOT
APPROVE a donation in the sum of $1,624.00 to Landsdale Community Wesleyan
Methodist Church towards a 100% waiver of the bond, facility hire and bin hire
at Warradale Hall and Park, plus electrician and St John Ambulance costs in
order to run the Landsdale Community Carols in the Park to be held on 11
December 2015; and
9. APPROVES
a donation in the sum of $3,362.50 to One Church Perth to cover food
costs for the Wanneroo Christmas Lunch to be held at the Margaret Cockman
Pavilion on 25 December 2015 noting that funding for this donation will be from
account 717151-9399-316 – (Manage Directorate - Office Chief Executive -
General Expenditure / Contribution Donation Sponsorship Expenses).
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Letter from Rev C George - Landsdale Community Wesleyan
Methodist Church - Request for Donation to Landsdale Community Carols in the
Park - 11 December 2015
|
15/556588
|
|
CS07-12/15 Delegation
of Authority - City of Wanneroo Local Laws - Appointment of Authorised Persons
File Ref: 9167
– 15/561486
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider an amendment to the City of Wanneroo (the City)
Delegated Authority Register to delegate authority to the Chief Executive
Officer to consolidate the appointment of Authorised Persons under the Local
Government Act 1995 for all City Local laws and the repeal of the existing
delegations of authority for the appointment of Authorised Persons under
individual local laws.
Background
Authorised Persons are appointed by a local government to
undertake certain functions and exercise certain powers in respect of
prescribed applicable legislation including the City’s Local Laws.
Currently there are eight individual Delegations of
Authority for the appointment of Authorised Persons under Section 9.10 of the Local
Government Act (the Act) set out in the City’s Delegated
Authority Register (DAR) for the following Local Laws:
· Animals
Local Law;
· Parking
and Parking Facilities Local Law;
· Signs
Local Law;
· Local
Government and Public Property Local Law;
· Private
Property Local Law;
· Extractive
Industries Local Law;
· Trading
in Public Places Local Law; and
· Health
Local Law
The City is currently reviewing all of its local laws with
the view of either updating and amending existing local laws or repealing and
creating new local laws. As a result each of the delegations described
above will need to be amended as each new or amended local law is adopted and
gazetted as part of the City’s eight year local law review.
Detail
Whilst drafting a new delegation for the recently gazetted
Parking Local Law 2005 which came into operation on 25 November 2015 it was
determined that it would be more effective for Council to approve an
overarching consolidated delegation for the appointment of Authorised persons
as set out in Attachment 1 as they are essentially identical. This would
assist with the future implementation of local laws once gazetted so that there
is no delay between the date of implementation and the ability for Authorised
Officers to undertake their functions.
This practice has been adopted in other local governments
including the City of Perth and the City of Belmont.
Existing delegations of authority (Attachment 2) will
be repealed as part of the adoption of the proposed overarching consolidated
delegation.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The adoption of a consolidated Delegation of Authority for
the Appointment of Authorised Persons that covers all of the City’s Local
Laws will assist with streamlining the processes of implementing new or amended
Local Laws by enabling the appointment of Authorised Persons in a timely
manner.
Statutory
Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 4 – Local government employees
“5.42 Delegation
of some powers and duties to CEO
(1) A
local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or
the discharge of any of its duties under -
(a) This
Act other than those referred to in section 5.43; or
(b) The
Planning and Development Act 2005 section 214(2), (3) or (5).
*Absolute Majority”
Local Government Act 1995
Part 9 – Miscellaneous provisions
Division 2 – Enforcement and legal proceedings
“9.10. Appointment
of authorised persons
(1) The
local government may, in writing, appoint persons or classes of persons to be
authorised for the purposes of performing particular functions.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DELEGATES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the power to appoint
authorised persons under all of the City’s Local Laws as per Attachment
1.
2. REPEALS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the existing delegations of authority to the Chief
Executive Officer for the appointment of authorised officers as listed below:
a. Delegation
9.1 Animals Local Law – Authorised Persons.
b. Delegation
9.3 Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law – Authorised Persons.
c. Delegation
9.6 Signs Local Law – Appointment of Authorised Persons.
d. Delegation
9.8 Local Government and Public Property Local law – Appointment of
Authorised Persons.
e. Delegation
9.12 Private Property Local Law - Appointment of Authorised Persons.
f. Delegation
9.14 Extractive Industries Local Law - Appointment of Authorised Persons.
g. Delegation
9.16 Trading in Public Places Local Law - Appointment of Authorised Persons.
h. Delegation
9.19 Health Local Law - Appointment of Authorised Persons.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
CITY OF WANNEROO LOCAL LAWS – APPOINTMENT OF
AUTHORISED PERSONS
|
15/561534
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Local Laws Delegations of Authority to be repealed
|
15/563947
|
|
CS08-12/15 Parking
Local Law - Delegations of Authority
File Ref: 2883
– 15/563602
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider delegating to the Chief Executive Officer the
authority to determine metered bays, metered zones, parking bays, parking
stations and the granting of permits under the City of Wanneroo Parking Local
Law 2015 (PLL) and the repeal of the existing delegations of authority
for the repealed Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law 2003.
Background
The PLL was adopted by Council at its meeting on 13 October
2015 and was subsequently gazetted on 10 November 2015 for commencement on 25
November 2015. Upon commencement of the PLL the City of Wanneroo Parking and
Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 was repealed and therefore the delegations of
Authority held in the City of Wanneroo’s Delegated Authority Register for
this Local Law are also to be repealed.
Detail
In order to replicate the existing delegations of authority
Administration has reviewed the PLL and developed draft delegations based on
the new sections.
Section 2.1 of the PLL states that:
(1) The
City may constitute, determine and indicate by signs, metered bays and metered
zones.
(2) In
respect of metered bays and metered zones the City may determine, and may
indicate by signs -
(a) permitted
times and conditions of parking depending on and varying with the locality;
(b) classes
of vehicles which are permitted to park;
(c) the
amount payable for parking; and
(d) the
manner of parking.
In addition section 3.1 of the PLL states that:
“The
City may constitute, determine and indicate by signs –
a) Parking
bays;
b) Parking
stations;
c) Permitted
time and conditions of parking in parking bays and parking stations which may
vary with the locality;
d) Permitted
classes of vehicles which may park in parking bays and parking stations;
e) Permitted
classes of persons who may park in specified parking bays and parking stations;
and
f) The
manner of parking in parking bays and parking stations.”
Administration
is seeking Council approval to delegate these functions to the Chief Executive
Officer as shown in Attachment 1.
The setting
of fees for the amount payable for parking in metered bays and zones under
Section 6.16 and 6.19 of the Local Government Act 1995 is excluded as a
condition in the proposed delegation. This delegation replicates the
current delegation 9.5 Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law –
Establishing Parking Zones, stalls and stations.
Section 4.2 of the PLL states that:
“(1) A
sign may indicate that all or part of a parking station or thoroughfare is set
aside, during the period indicated on the sign, for the parking of vehicles
with a permit.
(2) The
City may issue to a person a permit in respect of all or part of a parking
station or a thoroughfare referred to in subclause (1).”
Administration is seeking Council approval to delegate this
function to the Chief Executive Officer as shown in Attachment 2 to
ensure the timely provision of permits. The setting of fees for the
amount payable for parking under Section 6.16 and 6.19 of the Local
Government Act 1995 is excluded as a condition in the proposed delegation.
This delegation replicates the current delegation 9.4 Parking and Parking
Facilities Local Law – Granting of Permission and Issuing Permits.
Any decisions made under the proposed new Delegations would
be in accordance with the requirements of the relevant Council Policies and any
conditions set down by Council from time to time.
The existing Delegations of Authority (Attachment 3)
for the repealed Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law listed below are to
be repealed:
· Delegation
9.4 Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law – Granting of Permission and
Issuing Permits; and
· Delegation
9.5 Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law – Establishing Parking Zones
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
It is important for
Council to note that delegating a power does not transfer that power to
the delegate, it merely replicates it and Council retains the ability to
exercise any power or duty delegated to the CEO. (s.59 Interpretation Act
1984).
The essential elements of a Council delegation are the
correct and accurate identification of the:
· power
or duty to be delegated;
· office
to whom or which the power or duty is to be delegated;
· circumstances
in which the power or duty can be exercised or discharged; and
· conditions
on the exercise of the power or duty.
Statutory
Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 4 – Local government employees
“5.42 Delegation
of some powers and duties to CEO
(1) A
local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or
the discharge of any of its duties under -
(a) This
Act other than those referred to in section 5.43; or
(b) The
Planning and Development Act 2005 section 214(2), (3) or (5).
*Absolute Majority”
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which
relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:-
1. DELEGATES
to the Chief Executive Officer the power to determine metered bays, metered
zones, parking bays and parking stations under the City of Wanneroo Parking
Local Law 2015 as per Attachment 1;
2. DELEGATES
to the Chief Executive Officer the power to grant permits under the City of
Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015 as per Attachment 2;
3. REPEALS
Delegation 9.4 to the Chief Executive Officer to establish parking zones,
stalls and stations under the City of Wanneroo Parking and Parking Facilities
Local Law 2003; and
4. REPEALS
Delegation 9.5 to the Chief Executive Officer to grant permission and issue
permits under the City of Wanneroo Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law
2003.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
PARKING LOCAL LAW – DETERMINATION OF PARKING
BAYS AND PARKING STATIONS
|
15/563446
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
PARKING LOCAL LAW – ISSUING OF PERMITS
|
15/563418
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law -
Delegations to be Repealed
|
15/563838
|
|
CS09-12/15 Appointment
of Delegates and Community Representatives to Committees and Working Groups
File Ref: 2379
– 15/538958
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the appointment of:
1. Elected
Member representatives to various Council Committees and Working Groups and
external committees/boards where the nominations for Elected Members that were
not present at the Special Council Meeting on 27 October 2015 were not
accepted; and
2. community
representatives to the Art Advisory Committee (AAC), the Environmental
Advisory Committee (EAC) and the Community Safety Working Group (CSWG).
Background
The Local Government Act 1995 (the Act),
Section 5.11 states that where a person is appointed as a member of a
committee under Section 5.10 the persons membership continues until the
next ordinary election day. In accordance with Section 5.11 of the Act
prior to the 2015 Local Government Elections, the City sought nominations from
community representatives for those committees formally appointed under the
Act, including the AAC and EAC.
The Act regulates Council Committees and requires that the
appointment of representatives is to be made by Council. The City applies
this same process to the appointment of representatives to its Working Groups
for consistency, even though there is no requirement to comply with the
Act. Council may also appoint representatives to external
committees/boards when requests are received to do so.
At the Special Council Meeting on 27 October 2015 a number
of nominations for committees and working groups were made for Councillors who
were not present at the meeting with such nominations being subject to their
acceptance. These nominations have been reviewed by the respective
Councillors and the nominations for the following positions were not accepted:
· Festival
& Cultural Events Committee – Delegate for South Ward;
· West
Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) North Metropolitan Zone –
Deputy Delegate; and
· Wanneroo
and Districts Historical Society – Deputy Delegate.
As all advisory committees and working groups were disbanded
prior to the Council elections in accordance with Section 5.11 of the Act, it
is now necessary to consider nominations for the vacant community
representative positions on the AAC, EAC and CSWG.
Detail
Festival & Cultural Events Committee (Internal)
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
|
The role of this committee is to make recommendations to
Council on policy matters pertaining to the promotion of the City's culture
through festivals and events
|
Mayor Roberts
(South Ward)
Vacant
(Central Ward)
Cr Newton
(North Coast Ward)
Cr Parker
|
(South Ward)
Cr Treby
(Central Ward)
Cr Fenn
(North Coast Ward)
Cr Driver
|
Meetings are held regularly as determined by the Committee
|
Council is now required to consider the appointment of a
representative for the vacant position of Delegate for the South Ward.
West Australian Local Government Association (WALGA)
North Metropolitan Zone
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
|
To present issues from the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup
and Stirling to WALGA State Council.
|
Mayor Roberts
Cr Zappa
Cr Cvitan
Cr Winton
|
Cr Driver
Cr Parker
Cr Aitken
Vacant
|
Thursday evening, every two months
|
Council appoints four Elected Members as delegates and four
Elected Members as deputy delegates to the WALGA North Metropolitan Zone with
each deputy delegate being a deputy for a specific delegate. Council is now
required to consider the appointment of a representative for the vacant
position of Deputy Delegate for Cr Winton.
Wanneroo and Districts Historical Society (External)
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
|
To foster an interest in the history of the Wanneroo area.
|
Cr Aitken
|
Vacant
|
Monthly meetings on the third Thursday of the month
|
Council is now required to consider the appointment of a
representative for the vacant position of Deputy Delegate.
Arts Advisory Committee (Internal)
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
Community
Representatives
|
|
To provide advice on matters relating to the arts.
|
Cr Parker
Cr Cvitan
|
Cr Fenn
Mayor Roberts
|
2
|
Tuesday 4.00pm. Minimum of four meetings per year
|
The Terms of Reference for the AAC provides for a maximum of
two community representatives who must be art professionals based in the North
Metropolitan Region. As the City grows, there has been an increase in the
activity of the AAC and the Terms of Reference have been amended (Attachment
1) to increase the maximum number of community representatives from two to
three.
The City received three nominations for the positions, the
details of which are set out in Attachment 2.
Environmental Advisory Committee (Internal)
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
Community
Representatives
|
|
To provide a means of
participatory two-way communication between the community and the City of
Wanneroo on environmental issues.
To assist Council with the
identification of environmental issues and the development of strategies
relating to these issues.
|
Cr Winton
Cr Sangalli
Cr Newton
|
Cr Driver
Cr Fenn
Cr Guise
|
4
|
Quarterly each year
|
A total of eight nominations were received for the four
positions available. A summary of all the nominations received including all
relevant qualifications and experience for each nomination are set out in Attachment
3.
Community Safety Working Group
|
Role of Committee
|
Current Membership
|
Time and Frequency
of Meetings
|
|
Delegate
|
Deputy Delegate
|
Community
Representatives
|
|
To work in partnership with the community and the Police
to develop a strategic approach to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the
wider community of the City of Wanneroo.
|
Mayor Roberts
(South)
Cr Nguyen
(Central)
Cr Newton
(North Coast) Cr Parker
|
(South)
Cr Hayden
(Central)
Cr Cvitan
(North Coast)
Cr Sangalli
|
5
|
5.30pm Thursday
At least four times per year
|
The City received five nominations for the positions, the
details of which are set out in Attachment 4.
Comment
Committees and Working Groups
assist Council to perform its legislative responsibilities and representation
on externally based committees allows the City of Wanneroo to have input into
various issues that face the local government industry.
Where there are more nominations than vacancies for Elected
Member representation, a ballot will need to be conducted however Council has
the discretion to amend the Terms of Reference for any Committee or Working
Group should Council deem it appropriate to change the representation.
There is no discretion to amend a terms of reference for external committees or
boards.
Arts Advisory Committee (Internal)
The 3 nominations received for the two community
representative positions are as follows:
· Ms
Logue has been a previous member of the AAC where she has demonstrated her
knowledge and local perspective at meetings.
· Mr
Dennis has a long career in the arts and his input as a community
representative to the City’s public art commissions would be
valuable.
· Mr
Blank’s previous experience as an art educator and his interest in
fostering contemporary arts practice and promotion would also be valuable to
the work of the AAC.
Administration has reviewed each nomination and recommends
that all nominees be appointed to represent the community on the AAC subject to
Council endorsement of the amended Terms of Reference.
Environmental Advisory Committee (Internal)
A total of eight nominations were received for community
representatives on the EAC. As the EAC Terms of Reference only allow a
maximum of four community representatives, not all of the nominations can be
supported.
Administration has reviewed each nomination and recommends
that the following nominees be appointed to represent the community on the EAC:
· Mr
John Kelly – A long standing member of the EAC who has provided comment
on many of the City’s Environmental Policies, Strategies and Plans over
10 years;
· Mr
Kevin McLeod – Actively involved in, and experienced with local
environmental issues in and around the City and was the previous chair of the
EAC;
· Mrs
Renata Zelinova – Highly qualified and experienced in matters of
environmental management and biodiversity conservation and has extensive local
government experience; and
· Mr
Robin Phillips – Knowledgeable in environmental issues within the City,
and brings experience from a diverse and active background in environmental
science.
Administrations recommendation is based on the relevant
experience and qualifications of each of their nominees, and Administration is
of the view that they would bring valuable experience and knowledge to the EAC.
While Administration acknowledges and appreciates the
nominations received by Mr Ian Hamilton, Mr Lewis Flood, Ms Kadambii Barnao,
and Mr Kevin Russell, their nominations are respectfully not recommended in
this instance.
Community Safety Working Group
The five nominations received for the five community
representative positions are as follows:
· Mr
Ashley Edwards – A member of the CSWG for the past 2 years and has previous experience in community safety issues and
has been a Suburb Manager for Neighbourhood Watch;
· Mr
Ian Payne - A member of the CSWG for the past 2 years with a desire to make a
positive contribution to the community by being involved in the growth of
safety within the City;
· Ms
Phyllis Nelhams - has previous experience in community safety issues and has
been a past president of Safer WA;
· Mr
Barry Lloyd - currently works for a Commercial Drug and Alcohol Testing company
which has given him a unique perspective on the challenges that are present in
the community and the need to remain vigilant and have the right policies and
plans in place to support and promote Community Safety
· Mr
Norman Hewer - Deputy Chair of the CSWG over the past 5 years as an Elected
Member with a strong interest in community safety;
Administration has reviewed each nomination and recommends
that all nominees be appointed to represent the community on the CSWG.
Statutory
Compliance
The
requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 are as follows:
“Appointment of
committee members:-
5.10 (1) A
committee is to have as its members:
(a) persons appointed* by the local government
to be members of the committee (other than those referred to in paragraph (b));
and
(b) persons who are appointed to be members of
the committee under subsection (4) or (5).
* Absolute majority required.
(2) At any given time each council member is
entitled to be a member of at least one committee referred to in section
5.9(2)(a) or (b) and if a council member nominates himself or herself to be a
member of such a committee or committees, the local government is to include
that council member in the persons appointed under subsection (1)(a) to at
least one of those committees as the local government decides.
(3) Section 52 of the Interpretation Act 1984
applies to appointments of committee members other than those appointed under
subsection (4) or (5) but any power exercised under section 52(1) of that Act
can only be exercised on the decision of an absolute majority of the local
government.
(4) If at a meeting of the council a local
government is to make an appointment to a committee that has or could have a
council member as a member and the mayor or president informs the local
government of his or her wish to be a member of the committee, the local
government is to appoint the mayor or president to be a member of the
committee.
(5) If at a meeting of the council a local
government is to make an appointment to a committee that has or will have an
employee as a member and the CEO informs the local government of his or her
wish:
(a) to
be a member of the committee; or
(b) that a representative of the CEO be a
member of the committee,
the local
government is to appoint the CEO or the CEO's representative, as the case may
be, to be a member of the committee.
Tenure of committee membership:-
5.11 (1) Where a person is appointed as
a member of a committee under section 5.10(4) or (5), the person's membership
of the committee continues until:
(a) the person no longer holds the office by
virtue of which the person became a member, or is no longer the CEO, or the
CEO's representative, as the case may be;
(b) the
person resigns from membership of the committee;
(c) the
committee is disbanded; or
(d) the
next ordinary elections day,
whichever happens first.
(2) Where a person is appointed as a member of
a committee other than under section 5.10(4) or (5), the person's membership of
the committee continues until:
(a) the
term of the person's appointment as a committee member expires; or
(b) the local government removes the person from
the office of committee member or the office of committee member otherwise
becomes vacant; or
(c) the committee is disbanded; or
(d) the next ordinary elections day,
whichever happens first.
5.11A Deputy
committee members:
(1) The local government may appoint* a person
to be a deputy of a member of a committee and may terminate such an
appointment* at any time.
* Absolute
majority required.
(2) A person who is appointed as a deputy of a
member of a committee is to be:
(a) if
the member of the committee is a council member – a council member; or
(b) if
the member of the committee is an employee – an employee; or
(c) if the member of the committee is not a
council member or an employee – a person who is not a council member or an
employee; or
(d) if the member of the committee is a person
appointed under section 5.10(5) – a person nominated by the CEO.
(3) A deputy of a member of a committee may perform
the functions of the member when the member is unable to do so by reason of
illness, absence or other cause.
(4) A deputy member of a committee, while acting as
a member, has all the functions of and all the protection given to a
member."
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within
Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023 :
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.1 Listening
and Leading - Our community actively participates in forums and events to
discuss and inform the local decision-making.”
4.2 Working
With Others – The community is a desirable place to live and work as the
City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPOINTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following Elected Members to committees and external
committees/boards in accordance with their Terms of Reference where applicable:
a) Festival
& Cultural Events Committee – One delegate from South Ward being Cr
_____________;
b) West
Australian Local Government Association North Metropolitan Zone –deputy
delegate for Cr Winton being Cr ___________ ; and
c) Wanneroo
and Districts Historical Society – One deputy delegate being Cr
_____________.
2. ADOPTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the revised Terms of Reference for the Art Advisory
Committee as included in Attachment 1;
3. APPOINTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Ms Suzanne Logue, Mr William Dennis and Mr Jeremy Blank as
community representatives on the Art Advisory Committee for a term ending at
the next Local Government Election in October 2017;
4. APPOINTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Mr John Kelly, Mr Kevin McLeod, Mrs Renata Zelinova and
Mr Robin Phillips as community representatives on the Environmental
Advisory Committee;
5. THANKS
Mr Lewis Flood for his past contribution to the Environmental Advisory
Committee as a former member;
6. ACKNOWLEDGES
the nominations received by Mr Ian Hamilton, Mr Lewis Flood, Ms Kadambii Barnao
and Mr Kevin Russell to be community representatives on the Environmental
Advisory Committee; and
7. APPOINTS
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Mr Ashley Edwards, Mr Ian Payne, Ms Phyllis Nelhams, Mr
Barry Lloyd and Mr Norman Hewer to be community representatives on the
Community Safety Working Group.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Cultural Services - Art Advisory Committee - Terms of
Reference
|
15/526936
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Arts Advisory Committee - Community Representative
Nominations Summary Table
|
15/551909
|
|
|
3.
|
Environmental Advisory Committee - Community
Representative Nominations Summary Table
|
15/551741
|
|
|
4.
|
Community Safety Working Group - Community
Representative Nominations Summary
|
15/561708
|
|
Property
CS10-12/15 Proposed
Commercial Industrial Land Lease to Asphaltech Pty Ltd. Portion Lot 9003
(85) Mather Drive, Neerabup
File Ref: 5942
– 15/533387
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider entering into a commercial land lease over a
5,000m2 portion of Lot 9003 (85) Mather Drive, Neerabup (Lot 9003)
with Asphaltech Pty Ltd (Asphaltech).
Background
Land
Lot 9003 on Deposited Plan 70103
(Certificate of Title Volume 2765 Folio 589) comprises an area of 132.8358
hectares and is owned in freehold by the City. It forms part of the
Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA) and is zoned “Industrial” under the
Metropolitan Regional Scheme and “Industrial Development” in the
City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2).
Lot 9003 adjoins the existing NIA to the south,
LandCorp’s industrial development “Meridian Park” to the west and Barbagallo Raceway to the north.
Lot 9003 was previously known as Lot 2002 but a realignment
of Mather Drive and subsequent subdivision process resulted in a change of lot
number as detailed in the historical summary below:
· In
2008 a 5.3668ha portion of Lot 2002 adjoining the northern extent of the
existing NIA was identified for future subdivision. Clearing and the necessary
earthworks were undertaken to level the land for the creation of two separate
lots (2003 and 2004) as per Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)
approval in August 2008. The proposed subdivision was to result in the
creation of Lots 2003 (3.7817ha), 2004 (1.5851ha) and new balance lot;
· Pursuant
to the WAPC approval, Lot 2004 (1.5851ha) was created and subsequently sold by
the City to Western Power in April 2011 for development as a future power sub-station.
Due to its proposed use as a sub-station there was no requirement to provide
essential utility services to Lot 2004 and subsequently subdivision was
approved;
· The
creation of Lot 2003 however was not granted approval due to Administration not
completing the necessary utility service works to the satisfaction of
WAPC’s conditions for subdivision approval. Therefore the balance of the
land remained in the freehold ownership of the City as part of Lot 9003 but
cleared and earth worked as part of the original development application; and
· The
proposed area relating to this proposal is predominantly composed of
sandy/limestone soil, cleared, unsealed and level except for a batter to the
southern boundary. It is not subject to the Construction and Environmental
Management Plan. The remainder of Lot 9003 is undulating land with a covering
of native vegetation.
Asphaltech
Administration was approached by Asphaltech in June 2015 to
lease a portion of Lot 9003 under a commercial ground lease arrangement. Following
initial discussions between Administration and Asphaltech, a preferred location
was identified within the southern-west boundary of Lot 9003, west of Lot 2004
(proposed sub-station) owned by Electricity Networks Corporation (Western
Power) and adjoining the existing NIA. The proposed site is 5,000m2
in area (approximate, subject to survey) with proposed access to be from Peak
Road, Neerabup (Attachment 1 refers).
Asphaltech is proposing to use the subject land for the
recycling of road pavement building material (asphalt, rock base, gravel and
limestone). The proposed development would include the stockpiling of
milled road pavement material and an on-site Pugmill to mix the material (with
bitumen emulsion). It is proposed that the subject land will be
sufficient to accommodate all structures, stockpiling and recycling processes
to enable the finished product to be utilised for either new road constructions
or road rehabilitation.
Asphaltech advised that it has identified the subject land
as an ideal location to enable it to store and treat in the order of 100,000
tonne of milled out road pavement material per annum in a controlled
conditioning and mixing environment.
Valuation
A market valuation was sought from
licensed valuer Qwest-Paterson to establish the current market rental of the
subject site. A report was provided to Administration in September 2015
and a rate of $9/m2 (plus GST) per annum plus outgoings was calculated.
This equates to $45,000 (plus GST) per annum based on a lettable area of 5,000m2
plus outgoings.
Detail
It is proposed that subject to in-principle Council approval
and advertising disposal requirements being satisfied under the Local
Government Act 1995, Administration will enter into “private
treaty” land lease arrangements with Asphaltech.
Accordingly, the following essential land lease terms have
been agreed with Asphaltech subject to Council approval:
|
Leased Premises:
|
5,000m2 portion (approximate, subject to
survey) of Lot 9003 (85) Mather Drive, Neerabup as hachured black on the plan
(Attachment 1 refers)
|
|
Lease Term:
|
Three (3) years with the option of two additional two (2)
year terms, subject to the terms of a break clause (early termination)
|
|
Break Clause (Early
Termination):
|
The City reserves the right after the second anniversary
of the lease commencement date to terminate the lease with twelve (12) months
written notice without any penalty (i.e. the earliest time for termination would
be the third anniversary)
|
|
Licence Area:
|
4,800m2 portion of Lot 9003 (85) Mather Drive,
Neerabup located directly off of Peak Rd and proposed as an access driveway (Attachment
1 refers)
|
|
Commencement Date:
|
Should all necessary planning
and environmental approvals be granted, the land lease will be executed
|
|
Permitted Purpose:
|
Hardstand and the storage,
processing and recycling of road pavement material with the addition of
onsite manufactured bituminous products.
|
|
Ground Lease Rental:
|
$45,000 (plus GST) per annum plus outgoings
|
|
CPI/Market Rent
Review:
|
Annual increase in accordance with CPI
|
|
Bond/Bank Guarantee:
|
Four (4) month’s rent (plus GST)
|
|
Legal Costs:
|
Lessee responsibility – documentation to be prepared
by the City’s lawyers at the Lessee’s cost
|
|
Development
Application:
|
Lessee responsibility, at its cost. Should development
approval be granted, the land lease will commence
|
Environmental
Considerations:
|
Lessee responsibility, at its cost.
Relevant environmental approvals from the Department of
Environment Regulation (DER) and/or other relevant statutory bodies are to be
provided to the City prior to the commencement of the land lease
|
|
Noise Management
Plan:
|
Lessee to implement and manage
|
|
Scope of Works:
|
Lessee’s responsibility - full site remediation,
clearing and preparation, installation of necessary infrastructure, fencing
of site where required, any necessary upgrades and all other related costs
necessary to construct the leased premises
|
|
Removal of
Improvements:
|
Lessee responsibility - all improvements and equipment to
be removed at the expiration or determination of the lease leaving the leased
premises flat, contamination free and level
|
|
No Caveat:
|
Lessee must not lodge a caveat over the land or part
thereof
|
|
Maintenance/Repair
of Premises (including Structural:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Services (Water,
Electricity, etc.):
|
Lessee responsibility to arrange for the installation,
connection, maintenance and upgrade of any required services/meters at its
cost if required
|
|
Rates, Taxes and
Outgoings:
|
Lessee responsible for all rates (including Council rates
and water rates), taxes, assessments, impositions and outgoings for water,
electricity, gas and telephone/broadband used in relation to the premises
whether billed directly or otherwise
|
|
Emergency Services
Levy:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Cleaning:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Signage:
|
Lessee responsibility, subject to appropriate approval
|
|
Public Liability
Insurance:
|
Lessee responsibility - $20 million (or a greater amount required
by the City)
|
|
Other Insurances:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Provision of Toilet
Requisites:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Statutory
Compliance:
|
Lessee responsibility
|
|
Environmental Land
Assessment Report:
|
Lessor responsibility prior to the commencement of the
land lease. Lessee responsibility at the termination of the lease or sale of
the land to determine any environmental/contamination variations
|
Note that:
· the
proposed subject land does not currently have a constructed road frontage,
however access to the proposed lease area will be provided from the western end
of Peak Road by way of an access licence; and
· the
land is un-serviced.
Consultation
The essential terms of the
proposed land lease have been prepared in consultation with Asphaltech.
· The
proposed use of the land will require a formal lodgement of a Development
Application with the City;
· The
proposal as outlined to-date appears to have a suitable use within the
City’s DPS2; and
· Asphaltech
is aware of its environmental considerations and the requirement of it to apply
and document for the necessary approvals from the DER.
It is proposed that, subject to Council in-principle
approval to the essential terms of the land lease and subject to no submissions
being received from the required advertising of the disposal, formal commercial
land lease documentation will be prepared by the City's lawyers at
Asphaltech’s cost.
Environmental and Contamination concerns
Following consideration by Administration in relation to
potential environmental and contamination concerns impacting on the
City’s landholding resulting from the proposal, details were requested
from Asphaltech relating to compliance, accreditations, insurances and
mitigation processes.
Subsequently Asphaltech provided an overview of its company
history, proposed on-site processes, DER compliance requirements for both its
existing operations in Malaga and the proposed Neerabup proposal. In addition
Asphaltech provided copies of existing insurance Certificates of Currency and
Australian accreditations relating to its Malaga operation centre.
Accreditations provided include Quality Management System, OH&S Management
System and Environmental Management System (Attachment 2 refers).
Comment
There is no plan for the City to develop the subject land in
the immediate short term. The proposed length of tenure can be terminated with
12 months written notice after the second anniversary of the land lease
commencement date should the City move forward with the development of the NIA.
Whilst it is envisaged at this stage that the land
lease term will only be short term, Asphaltech has advised the City that it
would be interested in purchasing either all or a portion of the subject area
of Lot 9003 should it be subdivided and made available for purchase in the
future. This however would be subject to the City’s future staging
and development requirements of the NIA, and subject to future Council
approval.
The subject land is currently vacant and unused and the City
should consider making a short term land lease commitment which would return a
favourable rental in today’s current market providing that the necessary
planning and environmental approvals are granted. Should the land lease be
approved, Administration will arrange for an environmental land assessment
report to be prepared that will record any identifiable contamination on-site
prior to the land lease commencing.
At the expiration or determination of the land lease, it
will be Asphaltech’s responsibility to:
· remove
any improvements to the land and make good at its cost including any
environmental waste spill and hazards; and
· arrange
an environmental land assessment report at its cost that will determine any
environmental/contamination variations.
Asphaltech’s proposal makes extensive use of recycled
material and should the land lease be approved, it has expressed a desire to
work with the City to incorporate any waste glass that the City has no use for
into its end product.
Should Council agree to the proposed land lease, it will be
necessary to publish a local notice of the proposal inviting public
submissions. Subject to no submissions being received from the
advertising process, formal consent to the land lease as outlined in this
report is sought from Council. If any submissions are received, the land
lease will not be executed until a further report addressing the submissions is
presented to Council for consideration.
Delegation 1.14 (Disposing of Property - Private Treaty) of
the City’s Delegated Authority Register, delegates the power to dispose
of property by private treaty to the Chief Executive Officer, subject to
Section 3.58(3) and (4) of the Local Government Act 1997. The proposed
disposal will be included in future City budgets and will be recorded on the
appropriate record and/or register as per Section 5.46(3) of the Local
Government Act 1997.
To assist and alleviate the City’s concerns pertaining
to environmental or contamination impacts of the proposal on its land,
Administration considers that it may be prudent for the City to engage the
services of a suitably qualified environmental consultancy to undertake a high
level environmental land assessment report of the site prior to any
improvements to clearly establish the quality of the site prior to the
commencement of the lease. The report would include details of the current
condition of the water table and any required future monitoring. It is
recommended that this report be signed by all parties, confirming and agreeing
to the environmental pre-development status of the site. Equally it may be
prudent to undertake a similar report at the termination of the lease or sale
of the land to verify any environmental or contamination variations following
the use of the site as proposed. Based on previous experience, Administration
estimates the provision of an environmental assessment report would be in the
vicinity of $15,000.
Asphaltech has provided information of its proposed on-site
processes, DER compliance requirements and copies of its existing insurances
and accreditations (Attachment 2 refers) to Administrations
satisfaction. Asphaltech has also agreed to provide a bond or bank guarantee
for four month’s rent (plus GST) in order to mitigate any future
potential on-site environmental and contamination concerns and their subsequent
implications. This is in excess of the usual protocol for commercial lease
arrangements whereby Administration requires payment of two month’s rent
as a bond or bank guarantee. Administration is satisfied that there has been
sufficient regard to the necessary due diligence to mitigate any potential
future risk of land contamination of Lot 9003.
Statutory
Compliance
The public notice advertisement
will fully comply with the requirements of Section 3.58 of the Local
Government Act 1995 with respect to the proposed disposition.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy
- Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and
employment.
3.2 Growing
Business - Our community is a preferred place for business to locate and grow.”
Risk Management
Considerations
|
Risk Title
|
Risk Rating
|
|
Relationship Management
|
Moderate
|
|
Accountability
|
Action Planning Option
|
|
Executive Management Team
|
Manage
|
Policy
Implications
The proposed lease has been negotiated in accordance with
both the “commercial” and “land lease” guidelines as
outlined in the City's Leasing Policy.
Financial
Implications
The proposed land lease would generate an annual income
stream to the City of $45,000 (plus GST) per annum with CPI
increases on an annual basis as advised by the licensed valuer, Qwest-Paterson.
A bond of four month’s rent (plus GST) will be payable
by Asphaltech on the execution of the land lease.
An environmental site assessment report (pre-development)
will be undertaken at an estimated cost to the City of $15,000 (PR-1006,
“Develop Neerabup Industrial Estate”). At the expiration or
determination of the land lease, Asphaltech will arrange for a further
environmental land assessment report at its cost that will determine any
environmental/contamination variations that, if identified will be required to
be addressed by Asphaltech at that time.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
in-principle, a commercial land lease of an approximate 5,000m2
portion of Lot 9003, (85) Mather Drive, Neerabup (Attachment 1 refers) to
Asphaltech Pty Ltd for a term of three (3) years with options of renewal for
two further terms of two (2) years in each case commencing on the execution of
the land lease with such lease to incorporate a break (early termination)
clause;
2. AUTHORISES
the publication of a local public notice of the intention to enter into the
land lease in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995;
3. NOTES if any submissions
are received a further report will be presented to Council;
and
4. In the event there are no
submissions:
a) NOTES the Chief
Executive Officer under Delegation 1.14 of the City of Wanneroo
Delegated Authority Register will approve
the land lease; and
b) AUTHORISES
the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the land lease
between the City and Asphaltech Pty Ltd in accordance with the City's Execution
of Documents Policy.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
2015-10 Asphaltech Proposed Lease & Licence Area
|
15/508971
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Asphaltech - Detailed Summary Executive Request
|
15/535794
|
|
CS11-12/15 Shared
Use Facilities with the Department of Education - Licence Agreements
File Ref: 5453
– 15/534753
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: CS08-01/06
Agenda; CS08-01/06
Resolution
Shared Use
– Public/School Sports Ovals
CS05-05/06
Agenda; CS05-05/06
Resolution
Community
Consultation for Shared Use – Public/School Sports Ovals
Issue
To consider entering into reciprocal, non-exclusive licence
agreements between the City and the Minister for Education for the use of
Department of Education (DoE) facilities and City owned or managed land.
Background
There are a number of locations within the City of Wanneroo
where planning approval has been granted for the development of schools and
public recreation facilities on a colocation basis. The principle
underpinning this arrangement is that the sports oval component or similar
facilities could be shared, along with the maintenance responsibilities, thus
avoiding the duplication of facilities.
The shared use sites typically involve adjacent land owned
or managed by the DoE and land owned or managed by the City. In general,
the City land will be Crown land managed under a management order and will be
reserves created under section 152 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (WA)
(previously section 20A under the Town Planning and Development Act 1928
(WA)).
As a result of the colocation arrangements, the area
required for the relevant schools is reduced by the area of the oval and
related facilities. In most instances, the facilities are constructed
straddling the boundary of DoE land and the land owned or managed by the City.
Licence documents are required for the relevant shared use
locations to coordinate access, and to apportion obligations and costs between
the City and the DoE.
Existing Shared Use Licences
At its meetings on 31 January
2006 and 16 May 2006 (Items CS08-01/06 and CS05-05/06), Council considered
proposed shared use arrangements at six sites:
· Abbeville
Park (Reserve 43899)/ Mindarie Primary School;
· Addison
Park (Reserve 41483)/ Merriwa Primary School and Merriwa Education Support
Centre;
· Gumblossom
Park (Reserve 28376)/ Quinns Rocks Primary School;
· Oldham
Park (Reserve 32938)/ Yanchep District School;
· Richard
Aldersea Park (Reserve 42042)/ Clarkson Primary School; and
· Warradale
Park (Reserve 45966)/ Landsdale Primary School, (collectively, “the
Original Shared Use Locations”).
The shared use arrangements for the Original Shared Use
Locations involved the City granting a licence to the Minister for Education to
use City-managed Crown land during nominated school hours. There was no
reciprocal access for the general public to the DoE’s land.
Council resolved (by resolution
CS05-05/06):
“That Council:-
...
2. APPROVES,
subject to the endorsement of the Department of Planning and Infrastructure,
the execution of Licence Agreements with the Minister for Education to grant
priority use of the following reserves by the listed schools….”
Licence documents were entered between the City and the
Minister for Education for each of the above sites. The licence terms
commenced on 1 January 2006 and expire on 31 December 2026.
In the case of the licence between the City and the Minister
for Education at Oldham Park/ Yanchep District School, the licensed area has
twice been expanded, further to Council resolutions CB05-07/14 and CS04-09/15.
Further Shared Use Locations
A number of other sites were
subsequently developed by the City in conjunction with the DoE on a shared use
configuration:
· Ashdale
Park (Reserve 48677)/ Ashdale Primary School;
· Belhaven
Park (Reserve 47792)/ Quinns Beach Primary School;
· Grandis
Park (Reserve 50790)/ Joseph Banks College;
· Houghton
Park (Reserve 48106)/ Carramar Primary School;
· Kingsbridge
Park (Reserve 47696)/ Butler Primary School;
· Peridot
Park (Reserve 45384)/ Neerabup Primary School; and
· Riverlinks
Park (Reserve 48471)/ Somerly Primary School, (collectively “the Further
Shared Use Locations”).
Apart from the Grandis Park/ Joseph Banks College site
(which is under construction), all of the Further Shared Use Locations have
been developed and in operation for a number of years (Attachment 1 refers).
Anticipated future shared use
locations (provisional names in some cases) include:
· Amberton
Primary School/ Alkimos District Open Space;
· Butler
North High School/ Butler North District Open Space;
· East
Landsdale Primary School/ Public Open Space, Lot 166 (484) Kingsway, Landsdale;
and
· South
Alkimos Primary School/ Leatherback Park.
In the case of the Further Shared Use Locations, the
licensing arrangements are reciprocal, in that the DoE has access to the
City-managed Crown land during nominated school hours, and the general public
can access some of the DoE’s land outside of school hours. This
necessitates reciprocal licensing provisions in the licence
documentation.
Administration and officers from the DoE have collaborated
over a number of years to develop a suitable template to be applied for the
Further Shared Use Locations.
Detail
Following extensive negotiations between Administration
(input from service units including Property Services, Parks and Reserves
Maintenance, Community Facilities and Legal Services), the DoE (with input from
the State Solicitor’s Office) and the Department of Lands (DoL), the
parties have reached a substantive agreement on the template terms. In
the City’s case, the agreement remains subject to Council approval.
The essential terms of the
template, as agreed with the DoE and the DoL, are as follows:
|
Licensed Area
|
The licensed area ("the Facilities"), with
the use area distinguished between the DoE’s land (“the
School’s Land”) and the City-managed land (“the
Land”).
In most cases, the Facilities will be limited to ovals
and similar playing fields.
There is potential that tennis or basketball courts,
or similar facilities, could be included in the licensed area, for example if
a basketball court was located on the DoE’s land but was available for
the public outside of school hours. The terminology used in the
template is flexible enough to accommodate this use where required.
|
|
Access
|
The licence provisions in the template are
non-exclusive. The City is not permitted to formally lease or licence
the Facilities on the Land to another party (other than the DoE) during
school hours, but there is nothing in the template that will preclude
informal access by the general public to City-managed land during school
hours.
|
|
Licence Term
|
For the Further Shared Use Locations, the term is
proposed to commence on 1 January 2016, and will expire on 31 December 2026.
In the event that the template is applied to future
shared use locations as proposed in this report, the term will commence on
the first day of the next calendar year, and will expire on 31 December 2026.
In all cases, provision will be made for a further
term, commencing on 1 January 2027 and expiring on 31 December 2031.
|
|
Insurance
|
Each party is responsible for maintaining its public
liability insurance policy. The template provides that the insured
amount is not to be less than $20,000,000, and can be increased at the
reasonable discretion of the other party.
Each party is entitled to request evidence of the
other party’s compliance with its insurance obligations.
|
|
Maintenance of Facilities (including mowing, cleaning
and rubbish removal)
|
The City's responsibility. The City will recover
an agreed (negotiated) portion of its maintenance costs from the DoE.
For the Further Shared Use Locations, the DoE’s
maintenance contribution for routine maintenance at each site (other than
Ashdale Park, which is subject to further negotiation, and Grandis Park,
which is under construction) is $16,680.76 (including GST) for the 2015/16
financial year. Payments have already been made by the DoE on this basis
for several years.
Routine maintenance includes mowing, fertilising, weed
control, soil wetting and minor repair works (below an agreed threshold).
In the case of Ashdale Park, the DoE engages its own
contractor to complete certain routine maintenance works. This reduces
the scope of work undertaken by the City. Administration is waiting for
the DoE to confirm the contractor’s remaining term, and will reflect
this in an adjusted maintenance fee in the relevant licence document.
The template provides for the parties to also agree to
an apportionment of major maintenance works (such as rectification of grass
dying, and maintenance and repair of reticulation and bore infrastructure).
|
|
Statutory Compliance
|
Both parties have an obligation to comply with applicable
laws.
|
|
Early Termination
|
Either party is permitted to terminate the licences
provided by the template by twelve months notice (without penalty).
|
Consultation
The essential terms of the proposed template have been
prepared in consultation with the relevant City service units, and with the DoE
and DoL.
Section 18 of the Land Administration Act 1997
requires the City to obtain consent from the DoL on behalf of the Minister for
Lands in respect of the licensing of City-managed Crown land. This will
occur when the template is formally adopted from each of the Further Shared Use
Locations and for any future sites on Crown land.
The DoL has been asked to provide “in principle”
consent to the shared use template.
Comment
The proposed licensing of the Further Shared Use Locations
under the template formalises an existing arrangement between the City and the
DoE and will clarify each party’s obligations in respect of the
land. The licensing will also confirm the City’s right to recover a
portion of its maintenance costs from the DoE.
Administration supports the ongoing shared use of the
Further Shared Use Locations, and recommends that Council approve the formal
licensing of those locations in accordance with the template described in this
report.
Given that further shared use locations between the City and
the DoE are identified as being required in upcoming years, Administration
recommends that a delegation is provided for the Chief Executive Officer to
sign future shared use licences with the DoE, subject to:
1. The
expiry date of the licence to be no later than 31 December 2026, with an option
for renewal for a further term expiring on 31 December 2031;
2. In
each case of exercise of the delegation, memorandums are submitted to the Chief
Executive Officer in the following respects to support the proposed licence:
a) The
Director Community Development, to confirm the consultation and related policy
compliance which occurred in the development of the shared use location;
b) The
Director Asset Management, to confirm the cost recovery arrangements and
quantum provided for in the licence; and
c) The
Manager Governance & Legal, to approve the terms of the licence;
3. The
adoption of each shared use licence to be advised to the Elected Members by a briefing
note; and
4. The
delegation to the Chief Executive Officer is not to be sub-delegated.
Statutory
Compliance
The proposed licensing arrangements between the City and the
DoE as provided in the template are considered exempt dispositions under Regulation
30(2)(c)(ii) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations
1996, which states:
“30(2) A
disposition of land is an exempt disposition if –
(c) the land is
disposed of to —
(ii) a
department, agency, or instrumentality of the Crown in right of the State or
the Commonwealth....”
Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows
Council to delegate functions to the Chief Executive Officer.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy
- Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and
employment.
3.4 Smart
Communities - Our community and businesses have access to the right information,
education and technology they need to be successful.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
The licensing of the Further Shared Use Locations and future
sites under the template will accord with the City's Shared Use Facilities
with the Department of Education policy, and with the DoL’s
guidelines for the co-location of DoE schools and public recreation reserves.
Financial
Implications
Under the template to be adopted for the Further Shared Use
Locations and future sites, the City receives an annual contribution from the
DoE.
For the Further Shared Use Locations (except for Grandis Park/
Joseph Banks College), the annual contribution will reflect current payments by
the DoE. Payments are receipted as operating income for the City’s
parks maintenance (GL code 628433-8999-151).
The contribution from the DoE is subject to annual CPI reviews
during the balance of the term of the Licence.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the licensing of recreational facilities at the following locations under
shared use (reciprocal) licences between the City and the Minister for
Education:
a) Ashdale
Park (Reserve 48677)/ Ashdale Primary School;
b) Belhaven
Park (Reserve 47792)/ Quinns Beach Primary School;
c) Grandis
Park (Reserve 50790)/ Joseph Banks College;
d) Houghton
Park (Reserve 48106)/ Carramar Primary School;
e) Kingsbridge
Park (Reserve 47696)/ Butler Primary School;
f) Peridot
Park (Reserve 45384)/ Neerabup Primary School; and
g) Riverlinks
Park (Reserve 48471)/ Somerly Primary School;
2. AUTHORISES
the Chief Executive Officer to execute in accordance with the City's Execution
of Documents Policy the shared use licence documents approved pursuant to item
1.; and
3. DELEGATES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to approve
and execute shared use licence documents between the City and the Department of
Education for co-located facilities on land owned or managed by the City and
the Minister for Education, subject to the following conditions:
a) The
expiry date of the licence to be no later than 31 December 2026, with an option
for renewal for a further term expiring on 31 December 2031;
b) The
adoption of each shared use licence to be advised to the Elected Members by a
briefing note; and
c) The
delegation to the Chief Executive Officer is not to be sub-delegated.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Further Shared Use Locations (Excluding Grandis Park)
|
12/138367
|
|
Chief
Executive Office
Office of the CEO Reports
CE01-12/15 Tri-Cities
Advocacy Visit to Canberra
File Ref: 16204
– 15/568638
Responsible
Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider authorising the Mayor and the Chief Executive
Officer to participate in a joint Federal advocacy delegation with the Cities
of Joondalup and Stirling, to Canberra, during February 2016.
Background
In 2014 and 2015, the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and
Stirling presented to members of Parliament in Canberra on the strategic
importance of the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor of metropolitan Perth.
This has provided a valuable opportunity to not only promote the region but
also to highlight key initiatives that each Council and the region wish to
partner with federal government to deliver.
Detail
Whilst the City of Wanneroo has maintained solid
relationships through its own individual advocacy efforts, it is increasingly
the case that delegations of local governments to Canberra at a regional level
are also becoming an effective method of strategically positioning regions.
This is particularly relevant for the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and
Stirling that together represent an estimated population of 570,000 in 2013,
growing to a projected population of 750,000 by 2031.
There are several key strategic priorities for our region
where a shared approach would be beneficial including:
· Tourism and Events
· Strategic
Transport Infrastructure
· Industrial
Development
· Housing and Infill
Development
· Activities Centres
This year’s delegation will focus on the tourism
potential of the region, highlighting key transport and social infrastructure
within the region together with the importance of agribusiness and research.
Consultation
Consultation has occurred between the Mayor(s) and Chief
Executive Officers of the Cities of Joondalup and Stirling.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working
With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City
works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management
Considerations
Increasing the awareness of the
strategic issues affecting the City of Wanneroo and the northern corridor of
Perth will assist Council in attaining federal funding which increases the
financial sustainability of the City. Showcasing the achievements within the
corridor increases the City reputation as being the Powerhouse of Growth in the
corridor.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The cost of the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer
attendance is as follows:
Airfare (return) $900
Accommodation $720
Meals and incidentals $300
Adequate funds are available within the budget to
accommodate these expenses.
Costs for a joint function will be shared equally between
the three Councils.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council AUTHORISE the Mayor and the Chief Executive
Officer to participate in a joint Federal lobbying delegation with the Cities
of Joondalup and Stirling, to Canberra in February 2016.
Attachments: Nil
Item 9 Motions
on Notice
MN01-12/15 Cr Dot
Newton – Donation Towards the Victims of the Esperance BushFires
File Ref: 3626V02
– 15/558691
Author: Cr
Dot Newton
Action Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider a donation of $5,000 to support victims of the
Esperance Bushfires.
Background
Lightning sparked the bushfire which started at Grass Patch,
Salmon Gums and the surrounding areas north of Esperance and was declared an
emergency on Tuesday 17 November 2015, when it claimed the lives of 4
people.
Property losses are high with 10
structures including Scaddan Town Hall and numerous homes, farm machinery,
sheds and out buildings damaged or destroyed.
East of Esperance, two other major
fires in Cape Arid National Park and the Stockyard Creek and Mullet Lakes areas
remain subject to a watch and act alert as there is still a possible threat to
lives and homes.
Detail
There are a number of organisations who have set up appeals
to support the victims of the Esperance Bushfire such as the Salvation Army and
the Esperance Fire Appeal - WA Farmers Federation.
City of Perth Lord Mayor, Lisa Scaffidi has activated the
Lord Mayor’s Distress Relief Fund (LMDRF) to raise and coordinate
donations to support the victims of the fires. The LMDRF is the
recognised state emergency fund and provides relief for personal hardship and
distress arising from natural disasters occurring within Western
Australia. The fund is operated by an independent Board with the costs of
administering the fund absorbed by the City of Perth; therefore all money
raised will go directly to those who need it most.
Consultation
Nil
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within
the City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in
this report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The donation of $5,000 to the LMDRF will be made from the
Award Governance Donations budget (717143-1207-316).
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. EXPRESS
their condolences to the families and victims in the wake of the devastating
Esperance bush fires; and
2. APPROVES
the sum of $5,000 to be donated to the Lord Mayor’s Distress Relief Fund
in support of the victims of the Esperance bush fires.
Administration
is supportive of this donation.
Attachments: Nil
MN02-12/15 Cr
Sabine Winton – Amendment to the Council Members Fees, Allowances and
Reimbursements Policy
File Ref: 11573
– 15/556706
Author: Cr
Sabine Winton
Action
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider an amendment to the Council Members Fees,
Allowances and Reimbursement Policy (Policy) to require that all
international travel undertaken by Elected Members be approved through a
Council resolution.
Background
The Policy, set out at Attachment 1, was formally
adopted in September 2000 and has been amended from to time in accordance with
its set review dates, or as a result of changes to legislation or as requested
by Elected Members and endorsed by a Council resolution.
The Policy provides that the CEO may approve an Elected
Member’s attendance for international Professional Conferences, Training
and Education tours providing that the Elected Member’s allowance has not
been exceeded and that the Elected Member submits the prescribed nomination
form addressing the following criteria:
i. relevance
to the Elected Member’s personal development;
ii. relevance
to the City’s strategic direction;
iii. relevance
to the Elected Member’s committee representation.
Where more than three nominations are received from Elected
Members for the same opportunity or event or where the request exceeds the
Elected Member’s allowance, the request is to be referred to Council for
approval.
Detail
Research has been undertaken in respect of other Local
Government policies that deal with attendance of Elected Members for
international professional conferences, training and education tours. It
has been identified that in many cases, international travel is only permitted
through a resolution of Council. This provides Council with an
opportunity to consider all aspects of intended international travel to ensure
that it aligns with the City’s strategic direction and the community’s
expectations of transparent and accountable decision making.
Comment
The policies of the Cities of Joondalup, Stirling, Perth,
Swan, Gosnells and Nedlands were reviewed and of the six Councils chosen, 5
support the position that Council approves all international travel.
|
Local Government
|
Policy Position
|
|
City of Joondalup
|
Elected Members may, with council approval attend an
overseas conference. Council approval must include a specific council
resolution indicating that the conference attendance will be of benefit to
the City of Joondalup, the Elected Members and details any conditions that
may apply. The approval is also dependant on whether the Elected Member
has sufficient funds in their annual Conference and Training Expense
Allocation to meet the costs.
|
|
City of Stirling
|
Elected Members are required to obtain approval from
Council to attend overseas conferences.
Reports to council must specify the benefit and
whether information to be discussed at an overseas conference cannot be
sourced from within Australia.
|
|
City of Perth
|
Elected Members may use their individual reimbursement
of expenses entitlement to attend overseas conference, study tours, seminars
or conventions. Alternatively overseas study tours approved by Council
may be funded from the Elected Members office account or the project budget
to which the study tour relates. This is subject to the appropriate
provisions being made in the adopted budget for reimbursement of Elected
Members’ expenses.
|
|
City of Swan
|
The CEO has the delegated authority through their
policy to approve overseas travel.
|
|
City of Gosnells
|
A resolution of Council is required to approve Elected
Members attending events where the estimated event expenses exceed the
available balance of the Elected Members annual expense allocation or the
event is to be held outside of Australia and new Zealand.
|
|
City of Nedlands
|
Where the total cost of the conference exceeds $2000,
they must be referred to Council for approval, otherwise the CEO approves.
|
Statutory
Compliance
The Local Government Act 1995 and the Salaries and
Allowances Act 1975.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic
Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A
Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and
professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our
community is developing.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which
relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy
Implications
The requested amendment to the Policy seeks to meet the
community’s expectations of transparent and accountable decision making.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council REQUESTS Administration to provide a
report to a Council Forum in March 2016 to progress a review of the Council
Members Fees, Allowances and Reimbursement Policy to provide that attendance by
Elected Members attendance for international Professional Conferences, Training
and Education tours must be approved by Council resolution and quantify any
other considerations that need to be included in the Policy to support this
request.
The proposed amendment to the City’s policy would align
with the general practice of five out of the six Councils chosen for research.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Council Members Fees, Allowances, Reimbursements
& Benefits Policy (April 2014)
|
11/114062
|
|
MN03-12/15 Cr
Hugh Nguyen – Recognising and Flying the Vietnamese Co Vang Flag
File Ref: 11572
– 15/556693
Author: Cr
Hugh Nguyen
Action
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider:
1. supporting the 40th anniversary of Vietnamese refugees settlement in
Australia (and in particular in the City of Wanneroo), by formally recognising
the Vietnamese heritage and freedom “Co Vang” flag (Flag),
symbolising the identity of the Australian Vietnamese community and
acknowledging their arduous refugee experience; and
2. flying the Flag on special occasions such as the Commemoration of
the Battle of Long Tan, “Tet” Lunar New Year, “Black
April” Day, Vietnam Day, Harmony Week and Cultural Diversity Week flying
the Vietnamese Yellow Flag at the City of Wanneroo Civic Centre in recognition
of the forty year anniversary of Vietnamese settlement in Australia.
Background
Council has
received a request from the Vietnamese Community in Australia (VCA)
Western Australia Chapter (see Attachment 1), for formal recognition of
the Vietnamese heritage and freedom flag, known as Co Vang (shown as a
yellow background with three horizontal red stripes as set out in Attachment
2). A list of long serving local community organisations have also
lent their support to this request, including senior citizens associations,
veterans associations, elderly refugee groups, community groups, local
businesses etc.
The Flag is an
important symbol of social justice, democracy and freedom for the Vietnamese
community in Australia, many of whom arrived as refugees in the
mid-1970s. The request has come as part of the 40-year anniversary of
Vietnamese refugee settlement in Australia and in the City of Wanneroo.
After the end
of the Vietnam war on 30 April 1975 (“Black April”), millions of
Vietnamese people were forced by the new Communist regime to flee Vietnam as
refugees in the pursuit of freedom and democracy, with an estimated at least
half a million people perishing along the way. Thousands of Vietnamese
refugees were re-settled harmoniously in Australia and today hundreds of
thousands call Australia home. Their arrival also marked
Australia’s abolishment of the “White Australia” policy, and
is a very significant period in our nation’s history.
The City of
Wanneroo in particular has a special connection with, and holds significance
to, the Vietnamese community with many Vietnamese refugees settling in and
beginning their new lives in the City since 1975, and working the numerous
market gardens within the City. Many of those market gardens are still
being worked by the Vietnamese refugees and their children, bringing great
economic benefits and prosperity to the City and her people.
Based on the 2011 Census figures, there is a strong and
diverse Vietnamese community living and working in the City, with nearly 4,000
people or 2.5% of the residents calling the City home.
During the last 40 years, as Australian citizens the
Vietnamese community has held an unshakable sense of gratitude and
determination to make their contribution to this nation and to this City.
They continue to work hard and have successfully assimilated and engaged in all
aspects of our society, contributing to the social fabric of this magnificent
City.
Forty years on, the Australian Vietnamese sense of gratitude
and determination has manifested into the many successful stories that have
become the hallmark of this nation. The Vietnamese community has proven
itself to be the triumph in the decision to abolish the White Australia policy,
the success of the multiculturalism policy, and added to the richness of the
Australian culture.
A look around our nation today reveals many success stories
from within the Vietnamese community, including:
· Anh
Do - Australia’s top comedian/entertainer/author and his brother Khoa Do
- Young Australian of the Year in 2005 and movie director;
· Mr
Hieu Van Le AO – Governor of South Australia,
· Luke
Nguyen – celebrity chef and television host;
· Dr
Anh Nguyen – the current President of the Vietnamese Community in WA and
a highly successful GP who founded the Bulwer Medical Centre;
· Celebrity
plastic surgeon Dr Anh Nguyen who was mentored by Dr Fiona Stanley AC and now
operates a highly successful clinic in Perth;
· Dr
Hanh Nguyen – a famous plastic surgeon in Perth, and his brother –
Dr Hieu Nguyen - a world renowned Endocrine surgeon, just to name a
few.
Within the City, there are just as many success stories which have
emanated from within the Vietnamese community, including:
· Mr
Thang Le – a highly successful local market gardener in Gnangara and
pioneer of world-class hydroponic farming techniques;
· Mr
Tiep Van Doan of Lion Mushrooms in Wanneroo who grows and supplies mushrooms to
numerous markets around the world;
· Mr
Thanh Nguyen – owner/operator of the famous Wanneroo Pizza business;
· Ms
Kim Tran – this year’s winner of the “Telstra Young Business
Woman of the Year Award”;
· Dr
Minh Pham – a well-known local GP practising and serving our community of
Girrawheen for over twenty years;
· Mr
Vu Tran – a dedicated local pharmacist looking after our community for
almost three decades; and
· Former
City of Wanneroo Councillor Anh Truong who served our community with dedication
and pride, just to name a few.
The Flag is an
important symbol of social justice, democracy and human rights for the
Vietnamese community in Australia, and those men and women who sacrificed to
protect freedom and democracy, in particular the 521 Australian Soldiers who
died on the battlefield of Long Tan, Nui Dat, Nui Le and Coral–Balmoral.
The City of Wanneroo has successfully worked with the Australian
Vietnamese Community on many projects including the annual “Tet”
Lunar New Year Celebrations, which has become an iconic event enjoyed by many
residents from within the City and the wider community.
The
Vietnamese community have embarked on numerous community activities including
volunteerism and charity work within the City, and fundraising to help those
affected by natural disasters such as the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires in
Victoria and the 2011 Queensland floods. These activities reflect
and demonstrate a strong ethos of community building and community service.
The request
for recognition of the Flag comes at a significant time of commemoration for
the Vietnamese refugee community across several generations, living here in the
City.
In marking this major event and acknowledging the contributions made
by Australian Vietnamese people to Australia, and to the City of Wanneroo in
particular, it is requested that the symbolic Flag be formally recognised as a
symbol of an arduous journey taken by the Vietnamese refugee community within
the City.
Detail
It is noted that a number of other Australian and international
cities have a long standing practice of flying the Flag during times of special
significance to the Vietnamese community. This is also true for a number of
Returned and Service Leagues branches in Western Australia and across the
nation who ordinarily fly the Flag on occasions such as the Commemoration of
the Battle of Long Tan and Vietnam Day.
Consultation
The Australian National Symbols Office of
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet was consulted in relation to the
flying of the Flag.
Comment
The Australian National Symbols Office of
the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has advised that there is no
impediment to Council flying the Flag at relevant times as long as it does not
replace the Australian, Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait flags.
Statutory
Compliance
The Commonwealth Government publish the Australian National
Flag Flying protocol which set out requirements for flying the Australian
National Flag, order of precedence, flying flags at half-mast, funerals and
flag raising ceremonies.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk
Management Considerations
There are no existing
Strategic or Corporate risks within the
City's existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in this
report.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS
the 40th anniversary of Vietnamese refugee settlement in Australia,
by formally recognising the yellow ‘Co Vang’ flag, symbolising the
identity of the Australian Vietnamese community and their refugee experience;
and
2. APPROVES
flying the yellow ‘Co Vang’ flag during times of special
significance to the Australian Vietnamese community at the City of Wanneroo
Civic Centre subject to the requirements of the Australian National Flag Flying
protocol.
The Australian National Symbols Office of
the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet have advised that the
Commonwealth Government’s policy position in respect of flying other
nation’s flags is that only the official recognised national flags should
be flown in locations or memorials controlled by the Commonwealth Government or
any commemorative event at which an official Commonwealth Government official
representative is present.
Acknowledging the Commonwealth
Government’s policy position, it is important to note that the:
1. City of Wanneroo Civic Centre is not a location controlled by the
Commonwealth Government; and
2. Flag is not recognised as the national flag of Vietnam but instead
as a commemorative symbolic flag acknowledging the contributions made by
Australian Vietnamese people to Australia, and to the City of Wanneroo in
particular.
Currently there are four flag poles located at the entrance
of the City of Wanneroo Civic Centre on Dundebar Road. The flags
currently flying are the Australia National Flag, the West Australian State
Flag, the Australian Aboriginal Flag and the Torres Strait Islander Flag.
In the Jacaranda Amphitheatre of the City of Wanneroo Civic Centre there are
three flag poles and currently no flags are flown.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Letter from Dr Nguyen to CoW
|
15/563374
|
|
|
2.
|
Co Vang Flag and Vietnamese National Flag
|
15/563611
|
|
MN04-12/15 Cr
Sabine Winton – Cr Sabine Winton –Urgent Need for Further
Consultation Regarding Proposed Permanent Fence on Gumblossom Reserve
File Ref: 6006
– 15/571562
Author: Cr
Sabine Winton
Action
Officer: A/Director
Community & Place
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Administration undertaking formal community
consultation about the proposed permanent fencing of the eastern portion of
Gumblossom Reserve.
Background
The Quinns Football Club has requested a number of upgrades
to the facilities at Gumblossom Reserve as a result of the Club’s
nomination into the National Premier League Competition. There are
minimum criteria at home grounds required for acceptance into this
competition. The Club informed Administration that one of the minimum
requirements was for permanent fencing to be installed around the playing pitch
on the Eastern playing field.
Detail
An amount of $30,000 was listed and approved for fencing at
Gumblossom Reserve in the 2015/2016 Capital Works Budget. Information has
recently been sent to some residents informing them that a 1.2 m high
chain-link fence will be installed around the perimeter of the eastern pitch,
the works being scheduled for March, 2016.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Gumblossom Reserve is used for both organised sport and
passive recreational purposes, consistent with its designation as a
Neighbourhood Park. The installation of permanent fencing around a
significant portion of Gumblossom Reserve has the potential to adversely impact
on the amenity of the area and the use by various stakeholder groups and the
general public.
The permanent fencing of our reserves for soccer is not a
standard upgrade for reserves within the City of Wanneroo. The construction of
a permanent fence will have short term and long term implications for the users
of this Reserve, and this should be determined and considered before
proceeding.
Attachment B Community Engagement Framework, within the City
of Wanneroo’s Community Engagement Policy clearly shows that Consult and
Involve processes are appropriate where the City is delivering infrastructure
which significantly varies from normal standard upgrades.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal aligns with
the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society
- Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great
Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an
exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management
Considerations
There is a reputational risk in
erecting a permanent fence without seeking feedback from stakeholders and the
community.
Policy
Implications
Consideration of the City’s Community Engagement
Policy as it relates to the question of whether an “Informing” or
“Consultation” process should be undertaken.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
SUSPENDS
the scheduled works of chain-link fence at Gumblossom Reserve;
2.
REQUESTS
Administration to undertake further formal community consultation on the
installation of a permanent fence at Gumblossom Reserve, in accordance with the
City’s Communication Engagement Policy and the outcomes be presented to
Council for further consideration; and
3. REQUESTS
Administration to provide a report to Council about Gumblossom Reserve’s
current and projected capacity in meeting Quinns Football Club’s
participation in the National Premier League in 2016 and beyond.
In respect to the points made within the Motion on
Notice, Administration advises the following:
1.
Upgrades requested as result of
the Quinns Football Club (the Club) nomination within the National Premier
League
·
While the initial request made
by the Club for the additional facilities was made in the context of the Club’s
strategic goal of participating in the National Premier League (NPL), it is
important to note that the upgrades in question also support the Club’s
existing activities and participation in Football West leagues.
·
The upgrades in question
include:
o
100m2 Multi-Purpose Room
Extension and additional storage to the existing changeroom;
o
A chain-link fence (1.2m in
height) around the perimeter of the eastern pitch to separate spectators and
players/match officials, with an additional height section at the northern end
to stop balls going into the car park;
o
Increase in lighting levels on
the eastern pitch from 50 lux to 100lux (additional lamp on each existing
pole).
o
Additional spectator seating.
Not currently being pursued.
2.
Provision of a fence is not a
standard upgrade for reserves within the City of Wanneroo
·
While there is not currently a
City of Wanneroo standard for the provision of fencing of this type, there is
an existing precedent in that the same style of fencing has been provided by
the City of Wanneroo for the two main soccer pitches located at the Kingsway
Regional Sporting Complex. Additional height fencing has also been provided at
Ridgewood Reserve, Houghton Park and the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex to
address similar safety concerns.
·
It should be noted that the
intention is for gates to be located on both the eastern and western sides of
the fence (two on each side, near the corners) to allow for access across the
pitch by residents when match play is not in progress.
·
It should be noted that users of
the pitch will be required to lock the gates open after use, using City
supplied padlocks. This will enable community access across this pitch when
match play or training is underway.
3.
Community Engagement Policy
Implications
·
In consideration of the City's
Community Engagement policy, the process undertaken was to INFORM residents,
rather than to CONSULT. The rational in support of this approach is as follows:
o
The Sports Amenities Building
additions and the provision of the fence around the eastern pitch are both
endorsed projects in the 2015/16 Capital Works Budget;
o
All of the identified facility
upgrades are consistent with the existing use of the reserve, augment existing
facilities currently in place and support all existing uses of the reserve;
·
The engagement process undertake
to date is as follows:
o
Mail out sent on 25 November
2015 to 212 residents within a 400m radius of Gumblossom Reserve. This has
included the Quinns Rocks Primary School, Peter Moyes Anglican School and the
Quinns Village Shopping centre;
o
Inclusion of the information on
the City's web site Info on City’s website and Facebook (from 4 December
2015);
o
Based on feedback from Cr Winton
and Cr Sangalli a letter will be sent to the Quinns Rocks Primary School
P&C.
o
A request was also made to have
the letter sent to residents along Quinns Road, which has already been actioned
within the parameters of the 400m radius;
o
A copy of relevant plans has also
been included in the information on the City's web site from 4 December 2015.
4.
Corporate Risks –
reputational damage
·
Suspending the installation of
the fence will put the City of Wanneroo at significant reputational risk with
the Quinns Football Club and its membership, given that the project has been
previously endorsed by Council through the 2015/16 budget process and also
given the fact that Mayor, Ward Councillors, Administration and the Quinns
Football Club have been meeting on essentially a monthly basis since August
2014 to progress planning for the facility upgrades.
5.
Implication on project delivery
·
The current project schedule will
see Request For Quotations being sought on 11 January 2015 with implementation
to be completed by 31 March 2016, in preparation for the 2016 winter season.
The recommendations of the Motion on Notice will obviously impact on the
project timeframe.
6.
Administration report regarding
capacity of the Gumblossom Reserve to host NPL games.
·
It should be noted that the
timeframe for the Club’s participation in the senior NPL is 3 to 5 years,
subject to securing promotion from their current league (Men’s State League
Division 1 and Ladies State Premier League);
·
Advice provided by the Club as a
part of the regular meetings held with Elected Members, Administration and the
Club has indicated that they do not expect any increase in the number of games
in the short term, given that participation in the NPL is based on a promotion
system. The Club has advised that any increase in the number of home games
beyond this would be considered to be minimal, no more than 1 to 2 additional
home games during the season.
·
Further clarification would be
required in respect to the scope of this report to enable an initial indication
of timeframes to be provided.
Attachments: Nil
Item 10 Urgent Business
Item
11 Confidential
CR01-12/15 Request
for Memorial Plaque at Deeside Park, Butler
File Ref: 20844
– 15/549202
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Corporate Strategy & Performance
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(b) the
personal affairs of any person.
CR02-12/15 City
of Wanneroo Mobile Beach Safety Patrol – 2015/16 Summer Season
File Ref: 5642V02
– 15/554163
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community & Place
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(iii) a matter that if disclosed,
would reveal information about the business, professional, commercial or
financial affairs of a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a
person other than the local government.
CR03-12/15 Southern
Suburbs Library (Kingsway) Update
File Ref: 5642V02
– 15/544425
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Community & Place
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a
contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government
and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
(d) legal
advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which
relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
(e)(iii) a matter that if disclosed,
would reveal information about the business, professional, commercial or
financial affairs of a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a
person other than the local government
Item 12 Date of
Next Meeting
The next Elected Members Briefing Session has been scheduled
for 7.00pm on Wednesday 27 January 2016, to be held at Civic Centre, Wanneroo.
Item 13 Closure
Noelene Jennings
A/Director Planning
|
|
Michelle Brennand
A/Director
|
|
Tim Evans
A/Director Corporate
|
|
