BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR ELECTED MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Council Chambers
Civic Centre
on 17 May, 2016 commencing at 6.00pm
BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR ELECTED MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Council Chambers
Civic Centre
on 17 May, 2016 commencing at 6.00pm
PROCEDURE FOR FULL COUNCIL BRIEFING
PRINCIPLES
A Council Briefing occurs a week prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting and provides an opportunity for Elected Members to ask questions and clarify issues relevant to the specific agenda items before council. The briefing is not a decision-making forum and the Council has no power to make decisions. The briefing session will not be used, except in an emergency, as a venue or forum through which to invoke the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and call a special meeting of Council.
In order to ensure full transparency the meetings will be open to the public to observe the process. Where matters are of a confidential nature, they will be deferred to the conclusion of the briefing and at that point, the briefing session closed to the public. The reports provided are the Officers’ professional opinions. While it is acknowledged that Elected Members may raise issues that have not been considered in the formulation of the report and recommendation, it is a basic principle that as part of the briefing sessions Elected Members cannot direct Officers to change their reports or recommendations.
PROCESS
The briefing session will commence at 6.00 pm and will be chaired by the Mayor or in his/her absence the Deputy Mayor. In the absence of both, Councillors will elect a chairperson from amongst those present. In general, Standing Orders will apply, EXCEPT THAT Elected Members may speak more than once on any item, there is no moving or seconding items, Officers will address the Elected Members and the order of business will be as follows:-
Members of the public present may observe the process and there is an opportunity at the conclusion of the briefing for a public question time where members of the public may ask questions (no statements) relating only to the business on the agenda. The agenda will take the form of:
Ø Attendance and Apologies
Ø Declarations of Interest
Ø Reports for discussion
Ø Tabled Items
Ø Public Question Time
Ø Closure
Where an interest is involved in relation to an item, the same procedure which applies to Ordinary Council meetings will apply. It is a breach of the City’s Code of Conduct for an interest to not be declared. The briefing session will consider items on the agenda only and proceed to deal with each item as they appear. The process will be for the Mayor to call each item number in sequence and ask for questions. Where there are no questions regarding the item, the briefing will proceed to the next item.
AGENDA CONTENTS
While every endeavour is made to ensure that all items to be presented to Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting are included in the briefing papers, it should be noted that there will be occasions when, due to necessity, items will not be ready in time for the briefing session and will go straight to the Full Council agenda as a matter for decision. Further, there will be occasions when items are TABLED at the briefing rather than the full report being provided in advance. In these instances, staff will endeavour to include the item on the agenda as a late item, noting that a report will be tabled at the agenda briefing session.
AGENDA DISTRIBUTION
The Council Briefing agenda will be distributed to Elected Members on the FRIDAY prior to the Council Briefing session. Copies will be made available to the libraries and the Internet for interested members of the public. Spare briefing papers will be available at the briefing session for interested members of the public.
DEPUTATIONS
Deputations will generally not be heard prior to the Council Briefing session and are reserved for prior to the Ordinary Council meeting.
RECORD OF BRIEFING
The formal record of the Council Briefing session will be limited to notes regarding any agreed action to be taken by staff or Elected Members. No recommendations will be included and the notes will be retained for reference and are not distributed to Elected Members or the public.
LOCATION
The Council Briefing session will take place in the Council Chamber in the Civic Centre.
Briefing Papers for Tuesday 17 May, 2016
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
3.1 Consideration of Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2
3.2 PT02-11/15 - Petition to Create a Second Exit for Mary Street, Wanneroo
3.4 Draft LPP 4.20: Split Coded Areas for Advertising
3.5 Response to Petition PT02-02/16 Quinns Dog Beach Extension
3.7 Consideration of the Draft Central Alkimos Local Structure Plan No. 95
3.10 PT01-01/16 Request for Cul-de-Sac for Parin Road, Marangaroo
3.13 Kingsway, Madeley/Darch - Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation Results
3.14 Budget Variation - Caporn Street Streetlighting
3.15 Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue Intersection Upgrade
3.16 Tender No 01625 Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade
Parks & Conservation Management
3.19 City of Wanneroo Surf Life Saving Club Funding Proposal
3.20 Request for Additonal Funding - Hudson Park Master Plan
3.21 Jimbub Reserve Changerooms and Floodlighting - Concept Design
3.22 PT01-04/16 Development of a Skate Park facility in Yanchep
3.23 PT05-04/16 Update of Petition for Bowood Park, Darch
3.24 Yanchep Lagoon Trails and Pathways Masterplan
3.25 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex – AFL Ground Cricket Wicket Re-location
3.26 Community Funding Policy Review 2015
3.27 Community Funding Program March 2016 Round Applications
Corporate Strategy & Performance
3.28 Warrant of Payment for the Period to 30 April 2016
3.30 Dedication of Lot 3 (57L) Gnangara Road, Madeley
3.31 Donations to be Considered by Council - May 2016
Item 5_____ Confidential Late Report (to be circulated under separate cover)
Item 6_____ Public Question Time
7.1 Access Issues Relating to Moorpark Avenue, Yanchep
7.2 Financial Counselling Services
Item 8_____ Date of Next Meeting
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region and I invite you to bow your head in prayer:
Lord, We ask for your blessing upon our City, our community and our Council. Guide us in our decision making to act fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty. May we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to a prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.
File Ref: 24859 – 16/118447
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the submissions received during the public advertising of Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2).
Background
Council at its meeting of 10 November 2015 considered proposed Amendment No. 148 to DPS 2 and a draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises (LPP 2.8) and resolved (refer Item PS01-11/15):
“That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No.148 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to amend “Table 1 (Clause 3.2) – The Zoning table” by modifying the use class ‘Liquor Store’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Commercial and Business Zones, and modifying the use class ‘Tavern’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Business, Commercial and Private Clubs/Recreation Zones;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 35(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No.148 is a standard amendment, as the amended permissibility’s in the zoning table are consistent with the objectives of the relevant zones;
3. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No.148 to the Environmental Protection Authority;
4. Subject to no objections being received from the Environmental Protection Authority and pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning Commission of its intention to advertise Amendment No.148 and ADVERTISES Amendment No.148 for public comment for a period of 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 47(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
5. Pursuant to clause 4(1) of the deemed provisions of City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADOPTS the draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises, as contained in Attachment 1 for the purpose of advertising, and ADVERTISES it for public comment for a period of 42 days by way of:
a) Advertisement in all local newspapers circulating within the City of Wanneroo for two (2) consecutive editions;
b) Display at the City’s Administration Centre Building and on the City’s website; and
c) Written notification to relevant stakeholders, as determined by the Director, Planning and Sustainability.”
In accordance with Council’s 10 November 2015 resolution, Amendment No. 148 was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for environmental assessment. The EPA advised the City that Amendment No. 148 did not warrant formal environmental assessment. Following receipt of the EPA advice, Administration notified the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) of its intention to advertise Amendment No.148. Amendment No. 148 and draft LPP 2.8 were subsequently advertised for public comment.
Detail
Amendment No. 148 to DPS 2
Amendment No. 148 to DPS 2 was prepared in response to a request from the community to provide Council with the discretion to determine all applications for liquor stores on merit. The preparation of the Amendment coincided with the release of Western Australian Local Government Associations (WALGA)’s Local Government Town Planning Guideline for Alcohol Outlets, which included recommendations to tighten controls over the permissibility of alcohol related land uses in local planning scheme zoning tables.
Amendment No.148 proposes to amend DPS 2 by modifying the use class ‘Liquor Store’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Commercial and Business Zones, and modifying the use class ‘Tavern’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Business, Commercial and Private Clubs/Recreation Zones.
The current permissibility for ‘Liquor Store’ in DPS 2 is ‘D’ in a Business Zone, ‘P’ in a Commercial Zone and ‘X’ in all other zones. ‘Tavern’ is a ‘D’ use in the Business, Commercial and Private Clubs/Recreation Zones.
The proposed permissibility would require all applications for a liquor store or a tavern in zones where they are designated ‘A’ to be advertised for public comment.
Following the public advertising period, Council would have the discretion to determine whether to approve or refuse the application based on its assessment of the proposal and consideration of any submissions received. This provides Council with greater control to determine the appropriate location for liquor stores and taverns than what is currently provided for under DPS 2.
Draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises
Draft LPP 2.8 was prepared to guide discretionary planning decisions for liquor store and tavern applications and to outline the City’s role and responsibilities in the liquor licensing process under the Liquor Control Act 1988.
Draft LPP 2.8 provides guidance for the following matters in response to a new application for a liquor store or tavern that is lodged with the City for development approval:
· Scope of planning assessments and basis for interventions or objections to applications for liquor licences;
· Information requirements for development applications;
· Advertising of applications;
· Assessment criteria for applications; and
· Involvement in liquor licensing.
Consultation
In accordance with Council’s 10 November 2015 resolution, Amendment No. 148 and draft LPP 2.8 were advertised for public comment for 42 days between 16 February 2016 and 29 March 2016, by way of:
· Advertisements placed in the Wanneroo Times, North Coast Times and Sun City News for two consecutive editions;
· A notice in the Council Civic Centre office and on the City’s website; and
· Written notification to relevant State agencies and stakeholders.
A total of six submissions were received on Amendment No. 148 and draft LPP 2.8 during the advertising period and one late submission was received. All seven submissions provided comments on draft LPP 2.8 and only four provided comments on Amendment No. 148.
A summary of the comments made in the submissions and Administration’s response to those comments is contained in the comment section below.
Comment
Amendment No. 148 to DPS 2
All submitters, with the exception of the submission received from Planning Solutions, on behalf of Woolworths Limited, either had no objection to the Amendment or no comment to make. Planning Solutions, on behalf of Woolworths Limited raised the following objections to the Amendment No. 148:
1. Object to the modification of the permissibility of ‘Liquor Store’ from a ‘P’ use to an ‘A’ use on the basis that ‘Liquor Store’ is considered consistent with the purpose and intent of the Commercial Zone as outlined in DPS 2.
Administration acknowledges that ‘Liquor Store’ may be consistent with the purpose and intent of the Commercial Zone. However, modifying ‘Liquor Store’ to an ‘A’ use will ensure that proposals will undergo the scrutiny of public advertising.
Additionally, discretionary classifications give the Council the opportunity to consider the proposal on its merits and exercise discretion in determining the proposal. Ultimately, this will ensure that the potential impacts of a ‘Liquor Store’ can be considered in the decision making process, which is not the case if ‘Liquor Store’ is a ‘P’ use. On the basis of the above, Administration is not proposing to modify the Amendment.
2. Object to the Amendment on the basis that Woolworths Limited was not formally notified of the Amendment during the advertising period.
Consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Regulation 47(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 in the manner outlined in the Consultation section of this report. Notwithstanding the above, following receipt of the submission, Administration met with the submitter to discuss their concerns with a view to finalising the Amendment. On the basis of the above, Administration is proposing to proceed with the Amendment.
3. There is concern over the permissibility of a Liquor Store or Tavern under a structure plan where the use is not specified, or where the zones outlined in a structure plan do not correspond to DPS 2.
A review of approved structure plans in the City of Wanneroo was undertaken as part of the preparation of Amendment No. 148, to ensure the compatibility of existing structure plans with the proposed Amendment. Structure plans either determine the permissibility of a use within the structure plan area, or contain text that applies the zoning table contained in DPS 2. In the few cases where a structure plan does not apply the zones identified in DPS 2, there is sufficient wording contained in the structure plan to ensure the land use permissibility of a comparable zone would apply. On the basis of the above, Administration is not proposing to modify the Amendment.
A summary of all comments made in the submissions and Administrations response to these comments is included as Attachment 1.
Draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises
Four of the seven submitters objected to elements of the Policy. The submitters have raised valid and fairly complex issues that require further consideration. On that basis, Administration recommends that Council delay consideration of the submissions on draft LPP 2.8 to provide sufficient time for Administration to further consult with submitters and resolve, where practicable, any outstanding issues prior to presenting a final Policy to Council for adoption.
Administration is required to report to Council at this Meeting to progress Amendment No. 148, as Council is bound by the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 to consider Amendment No. 148 within 60 days from the close of the advertising period which was the 29 March 2016. There is no prescribed timeframe for Council to consider and finalise LPP 2.8.
Should Amendment No. 148 be finally approved by the Minister for Planning prior to the adoption of a final LPP 2.8 by Council, there is sufficient planning control in DPS 2 to guide the interim assessment of planning applications for liquor stores and taverns.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 148 has been processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
In accordance with Regulation 50(3) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Council is required to consider submissions received in response to Amendment No. 148 and resolve to proceed with, or not proceed with the Amendment within 60 days from the close of advertising period. Advertising for the Amendment closed on the 29 March 2016; therefore Council will meet this requirement.
Further, pursuant to Regulation 53(3)(a), within 21 days of the passing of that resolution, the City must provide the WAPC with (among other things) a schedule of submissions and Council's recommendation and response to the submissions, together with particulars of any modifications recommended to the amendment.
Administration recommends that Council adopts Amendment No. 148 in accordance with Regulation 50(3)(a), without modification.
With respect to draft LPP 2.8, in accordance with clause 4(3) of the deemed provisions of DPS 2, Council must formally consider the submissions received and resolve to adopt the draft Policy, with or without modifications, or not to proceed with the revised draft Policy. A subsequent report will be presented to a future Council meeting to satisfy this requirement.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The finalisation of draft LPP 2.8 will complement the suite of policies adopted by Council and provide guidance on how to respond to applications for liquor stores and taverns.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Regulation 50(2)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, CONSIDERS the Schedule of Submissions contained as Attachment 1 and ENDORSES Administration’s comments and recommendations in response to those submissions;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 50(3)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 SUPPORTS, without modification, Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to amend “Table 1 (Clause 3.2) – The Zoning table” by modifying the use class ‘Liquor Store’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Commercial and Business Zones, and modifying the use class ‘Tavern’ to a discretionary use requiring advertising (‘A’) in the Business, Commercial and Private Clubs/Recreation Zones;
3. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Director Planning and Sustainability to SIGN and SEAL the Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documentation;
4. Pursuant to Regulation 53(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015 and subject to Item 3. above, PROVIDES Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission together with a copy of Council’s resolution and all attachments to this report, for its consideration;
5. ADVISES the submitters to Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 of its decision and the status of draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises; and
6. NOTES that Administration will undertake further consultation with the submitters of draft Local Planning Policy 2.8: Licensed Premises to consider the issues raised and will report back to Council at a future Meeting to present a final draft Policy for Councils consideration.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1: Schedule of Submissions - Amendment No. 148 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 |
16/141246 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 11
File Ref: 20525 – 16/137266
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a petition requesting that a second exit for Mary Street, Wanneroo be created, by joining Mary Street to Benmuni Road, Wanneroo.
Background
At its meeting of 10 November 2015 (item PT02-11/15), Council received a seven signature petition which sought the following:
“We the undersigned petition the City of Wanneroo by joining Mary Street, Wanneroo to Benmuni Road, Wanneroo.
We are concerned for safety as Mary Street’s only exist is via Lenore Road. In peak hour this intersection becomes congested and if a bush fire or accident were to occur we would be boxed in.
We understand there is a second entrance gazetted joining Benmuni Road with Mary Street extension.
The immediate advancement of the above would be appreciated.”
Detail
Mary Street is a sealed road running for approximately 900m east of its intersection with Lenore Road. It is then gated at its eastern end.
Benmuni Road is a sealed road, terminating at a gate just to the south of its intersection with Shillington Way.
The road link which is sought by the petition to link the east end of Mary Street to the south end of Benmuni Road is shown on Attachment No. 1 (as a dashed red line).
It involves a length of approximately 750m. The southern part of the link would involve existing road reserve, while the northern part would involve having to pass through Reserve 43821, which is a reserve managed by the City for the purpose of Conservation and Passive Recreation.
Assessment of Reasons Given in the Petition
The petition presents a number of reasons why the proposed road link is seen to be required. These reasons have been assessed as follows:
1. Traffic congestion at intersection of Mary Street and Lenore Road
Queuing of traffic on Lenore Road in this vicinity occurs in the morning peak hour on the southbound lane, leading up to the traffic lights at Ocean Reef Road.
The City’s Traffic Services Team undertook observations of queue length and intersection movements during the morning peak time (7.00am to 8.30am) on a weekday in March 2016 to determine the extent, if any, to which queuing may cause difficulties for vehicles needing to exit Mary Street. Maximum queue length was recorded for each 15 minute period along with wait times of all vehicles exiting Mary Street.
The finding was that while the queue on Lenore Road did go through the Mary Street intersection at times, it cleared every time the signals changed. Also, vehicles in the queue tended to leave gaps through the intersection for vehicles to exit out of Mary Street.
During the particular observation period, there was never more than one vehicle waiting to exit at Mary Street and the maximum wait time was approximately 15 seconds.
Based on those observations it is considered that there is not a problem for vehicles exiting and entering Mary Street as suggested in the petition.
2. Fire risk
City fire officers have assessed the area around Mary Street and consider that there is no significant fire risk in this area which warrants provision of a second access route, considering:
· The large amount of irrigated market garden areas present which limit fire prone areas, and provide refuge areas in event of bushfire; and
· Much of the bushland in the area has been subject to mitigation burns, and future mitigation burns are intended.
They also advise that it would be inadvisable to direct people to the east in the event of bushfire as that is where most of the bushland is.
3. Other emergency access issues
Advice has been sought from the Officer-in-Charge at the Wanneroo Police Station regarding whether in his view, any other emergency access issues may be present in the subject area, and compounded by Mary Street only having access to Lenore Road. The Officer-in-Charge does not consider this area to present any other emergency access issues considering:
· The types of uses in the area (eg: none involve any significant use of hazardous materials);
· There are only a limited number of residents in the area and it should therefore be manageable to move these residents in the event of emergency, through emergency traffic control measures (if needed); and
· Mary Street has an ample reserve width.
It is considered from the above that there is currently no justification for providing the road link between Mary Street and Benmuni Road as sought by the petition.
Consultation
In assessing this issue, consultation has been undertaken with the Officer-in-Charge at the Wanneroo Police Station.
Comment
While it has been concluded that there is currently no justification for provision of the subject road link, it should be noted that Mary Street is included within the area affected by Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41, which proposes to rezone a large portion of East Wanneroo from ‘Rural’ to ‘Urban Deferred’.
Should this Amendment be approved, a likely condition of any future lifting of Urban Deferment would be the preparation of district structure planning for this area. Road network issues will need to be addressed through this process (and subsequent Local Structure Planning) and this will need to address the matter of future road connections from the Mary Street area to the surrounding road network.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
2.3 Safe Communities – We feel safe at home and in our local area”.
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated construction cost of the road link concerned is approximately $750,000. This assumes that all road reserves and clearing has been undertaken.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Does NOT SUPPORT the provision of a road link between the eastern end of Mary Street, Wanneroo and the southern end of Benmuni Road, Wanneroo, because:
a) Observations made by City traffic engineers have found that queuing of traffic on Lenore Road during the morning peak hour does not significantly impede vehicles exiting and entering Mary Street.
b) City fire officers do not consider the area to present any significant fire risk.
c) Local police do not consider there to be any other emergency access issues associated with this area which would warrant provision of the proposed road link.
2. NOTES that the subject area is affected by Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1308/41 which proposes to rezone the area from ‘Rural’ to ‘Urban Deferred’, and that if this Amendment is approved, the subsequent preparation of district and local structure plans will address the matter of future road connections from the Mary Street area to the surrounding road network.
3. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Mary Street map |
16/140239 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 16
3.3 Basic Scheme Amendment No. 158 to re-code additional properties in Girrawheen, Marangaroo and Wanneroo
File Ref: 5755 – 16/148996
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider initiating Amendment No. 158 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) for the purpose of:
· Re-coding a total of three properties in Girrawheen (1), Marangaroo (1) and Wanneroo (1) from R20 to R20/R40 to match the density coding with the surrounding land; and
· Amending the scheme text to provide for an additional vehicle access point on corner lots in split coded areas.
Background
At its 3 February 2015 meeting, Council resolved to initiate Amendment No. 119 to DPS 2 to increase the residential density coding of the Wanneroo and Girrawheen-Koondoola housing precincts for the purpose of public advertising.
At its 15 September 2015 meeting, Council considered the submissions received during public advertising and resolved to adopt Amendment No. 119 and forward the amendment documentation to the WA Planning Commission for assessment.
On the 24 March 2016, the Minister for Planning gave final approval to Amendment No. 119 and it was published in the Government Gazette on the 29 April 2016.
During the final stages of the approval process for Amendment No. 119, Administration identified two issues:
· Amendment No. 119 incorporates two scheme maps that identify the land that would be affected by the scheme amendment proposal. During the preparation of these maps, a mapping error occurred, which resulted in 3 properties being inadvertently excluded from the maps. This error was not identified until after the Minister for Planning had given final approval to Amendment No. 119, and was therefore not able to be rectified as part of Amendment No. 119.
· In the process of approving Amendment No. 119, The Minister for Planning directed the City to make a number of modifications to the Scheme text. Administration applied the schedule of modifications as directed, however, noted at a later date that the Minister’s requested modifications did not include Council’s recommended modifications relating to vehicle access for each street frontage, as endorsed on 15 September 2016. As a result, the adopted scheme text does not include provision for an additional vehicle access point to be provided on corner lots.
Administration consulted with the Department of Planning with regard to the above matters. The Department advised that a basic amendment to DPS 2 under the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015 (LPS Regulations) would be required.
Detail
The proposed basic amendment to DPS 2 comprises the following components:
Recode three properties in Girrawheen, Marangaroo and Wanneroo from R20 to R20/R40
The three affected properties in question are as follows:
· 11 Hawley Place, in Marangaroo;
· 71 Mirrabooka Ave, in Girrawheen; and
· 14 Dallas Crescent, in Wanneroo.
It is proposed that the basic scheme amendment increase the residential properties from R20 to R20/R40, in order to align them with the new residential densities of surrounding properties, consistent with the intent and purpose of Amendment No. 119. Attachment 1 details the proposed R-Code changes to the Scheme map.
Amend the Scheme text to permit vehicular access to each street frontage in split coded areas
Clause 4.5.4 b), as introduced by Amendment No. 119 reads as follows:
‘The development has one consolidated vehicular access point with reciprocal access right to serve all dwellings, and restricted vehicular access to other areas of road frontage.’
It is proposed to amend this clause to reflect Council’s recommended modification from its 15 September 2015 meeting as follows:
The development has a maximum of one consolidated vehicle access point for each street frontage of the lot, with reciprocal access rights to serve all dwellings.
The intent of this amendment is to respond to submissions received during public advertising of Amendment No. 119 and provide for an additional vehicle access point on corner lots in split coded areas to support redevelopment at a higher coding. In addition, the modification proposed will not detract from the streetscape objectives and will support draft LPP 4.20: Split Coded Areas, which is currently being prepared.
Consultation
Administration is not required to advertise a basic scheme amendment for public comment unless the Minister for Planning or an authorised person directs the City to advertise the basic amendment pursuant to Regulation 61 (1) of the LPS Regulations.
Administration has advised the affected landowners of the administrative error and the action that is being taken by the City of rectify the issue as quickly as possible. Administration will continue to update the affected land owners accordingly as this process moves forward.
If supported by Council, the Amendment will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority for comment, prior to forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for determination.
Comment
The proposed scheme amendment is considered to be a basic amendment under Regulation 34(a) of the LPS Regulations, which provides for an amendment to correct an administrative error without public comment.
Administration considers it a basic amendment because the exclusion of the three properties from the Scheme Maps was due to a technical error with the City’s mapping system.
Administration considers the recoding of these three lots necessary to align the R-Codes of these properties with the surrounding land, which will allow for cohesive and consistent infill development to occur in these areas. Furthermore, the Local Housing Strategy and adopted Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing Strategy Implementation included these lots within the housing precincts identified for increased densities. This indicates that the recoding of these lots was within the original intent of Amendment No. 119 and that their exclusion was the result of an administrative error.
The inclusion of the proposed change to Clause 4.5.4 b) is also considered to be a ‘basic’ amendment, as the Minister’s schedule of modifications did not provide comment or an explanation for why the final scheme text approved through Amendment No. 119 did not provide for a single vehicle access point per street frontage.
The proposed change to clause 4.5.4(b) will address Council’s recommended modification to permit an additional vehicle access point for corner lots. Although the Minister’s decision in relation to Amendment No. 119 is final, Administration understands that the WAPC’s Statutory Planning Committee was supportive of the Council recommendation for an additional vehicle access point on corner lots and considers that an administrative error must have occurred for it to not be approved by the Minister.
Statutory Compliance
Pursuant to Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, Regulation 34(a) provides for an amendment to correct an administrative error to be processed without a public comment period.
Should Council resolve to initiate this scheme amendment, Administration will have 21 days refer to proposal to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment, prepare all necessary documentation and forward the proposed scheme amendment to the WAPC to determine a decision.
Once the amendment documentation is provided to the WAPC for assessment, the Department of Planning will have 42 days to present a report, including a recommended decision, to the Minister for Planning for determination with or without modification. Unfortunately, there is no statutory timeframe for Ministerial signoff; however, at this time there is no reason to expect that the Amendment would be unnecessarily delayed.
The WAPC may determine the Amendment to be a ‘standard’ or ‘complex’ amendment, in which case the proposal would require additional steps including advertising for public comment. However, this is unlikely given the City has received preliminary advice from Department of Planning officers that it is a ‘basic’ amendment.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 158 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) MODIFY the scheme maps to recode three properties in Girrawheen, Marangaroo and Wanneroo from R20 to R20/R40 in accordance with the scheme amendment maps included at Attachment 1;
b) AMEND clause 4.5.4 b) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to read as follows:
“The development has a maximum of one consolidated vehicle access point for each street frontage of the lot, with reciprocal access rights to serve all dwellings.”
2. Pursuant to Regulation 34(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 158 is a basic amendment, as the Amendment is to correct an administrative error;
3. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 158 to the Environmental Protection Authority;
4. Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, PROVIDES Amendment No. 158 to the Western Australian Planning Commission within 21 days; and
5. Pursuant to Regulation 62(3) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to and endorses the signing of the Amendment documentation.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Amendment No. 158 Scheme Amendment Maps |
16/150912 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 23
File Ref: 26112 – 16/150728
Responsible Officer: Operations Manager Planning & Development Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider adopting LPP 4.20: Split Coded Areas (LPP 4.20) for the purpose of public advertising.
Background
On 3 February 2015, Council resolved to initiate Amendment No. 119 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for the purpose of increasing the residential density coding of the Wanneroo and Girrawheen-Koondoola housing precincts.
On 15 September 2015, Council considered the submissions received following 42 days of public consultation and resolved to adopt Amendment No. 119 subject to modifications and forward the documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for consideration.
On 24 March 2016, the Minister for Planning approved Amendment No. 119 and notice of this approval was published in the Government Gazette on 29 April 2016.
As part of its adoption of Amendment No. 119, Council also resolved to request Administration prepare a local planning policy to address consolidated vehicle access, design and streetscape development requirements for split coded areas, and to give consideration to sustainability measures that may be applied through this process.
The Draft LPP 4.20 was presented to Council Forum on the 3 May 2016 following which some minor amendments were made to the policy.
Draft LPP 4.20: Split Coded Areas is now being presented to Council for consideration to advertise it for public comment.
Detail
Under the new DPS 2 provisions introduced by Amendment No. 119, all proposals for development must be assessed against the lower density code unless the applicant provides evidence from utility providers stating that their existing capacity is sufficient to accommodate the proposed increase in density. Furthermore, applicants must also demonstrate that all proposed dwellings can be serviced by a single vehicle access point.
Draft LPP 4.20 as provided in Attachment 1, articulates the City’s expectations with regard to the garage design, street surveillance, landscaping and the design of crossovers, with the aim of achieving the following outcomes:
· To minimise the number of additional vehicle crossovers in recoded areas;
· To encourage attractive streetscapes and enhance neighbourhood amenity by reducing the amount of hardstand and paving that occupies road verges;
· To ensure safe vehicle access to and from residential properties;
· To ensure safety and amenity for cyclists and pedestrians in the public realm;
· To minimise the impact of vehicle access on existing street trees and verge infrastructure; and
· To maximise on street parking opportunities.
Detail on specific elements of draft LPP 4.20 are outlined below:
Utilities
Infill development will place additional demand on existing service utility infrastructure. During the preparation of Amendment No. 119, utility service agencies advised that there should be capacity to meet this demand, however, the infrastructure may be required to be upgraded by the relevant utility provider at some point in the future. It is important that this is effectively managed during infill development and therefore, a provision has been included in DPS 2 to require developers to demonstrate that existing infrastructure is sufficient to service all of the proposed new dwellings.
The City will not grant approval to any development application at the higher density coding unless the applicant has provided evidence by way of written advice from service agencies that the proposed increase in density can be serviced by existing service utility infrastructure.
Vehicle Access
As infill development areas are vulnerable to significant additional hardstand and vehicle access points, DPS 2 includes new provisions to require that all new development be serviced by one vehicle access point per street frontage.
Accordingly, the City will not grant approval to any development application proposing more than one vehicle access point per street frontage.
Furthermore, the City will not support any subdivision application referral from the WAPC that does not demonstrate how the proposed lot(s) will be serviced by one vehicle access point per street frontage.
Draft LPP 4.20 provides guidance on this issue by identifying likely development and subdivision scenarios and conceptual examples of how consolidated vehicle access can be achieved. In particular, consideration has been afforded to the following:
· Green title battle-axe proposals currently typically occur by providing a vehicle access leg for the rear lot, and a separate crossover for the front lot. In split coded areas, this type of development must be achieved using a single vehicle access point. Shared vehicle access will be achieved by requiring subdivision applicants to establish a right of carriageway easement between the lots and a restrictive covenant over the remainder of the lot(s).
· Grouped dwelling developments on subdivided lots, such as survey-strata, will be serviced by a single vehicle access point over identified areas of common property; the City will not support applications that comprise more than one vehicle access point per street frontage.
· The City will not support multiple dwelling development proposals that propose more than one vehicle access point per street frontage.
Draft LPP 4.20 also requires that additional vehicle access points do not conflict with existing street trees or infrastructure in the adjoining road verge and that sufficient verge space be retained for bin collection and on street parking.
Garage Design
Administration considers that appropriate garage design will ensure a higher quality streetscape outcome is achieved and facilitate effective surveillance of the streetscape (as required by Clause 5.2.3: Street Surveillance of the R-Codes).
Accordingly, draft LPP 4.20 requires garages to be setback 0.5m behind the alignment of any dwelling that has street frontage, as defined in the R-Codes.
This will better enable architects and applicants to leverage opportunities for new development to address the street and provide passive surveillance by providing additional space in the front elevation to locate clearly definable entry points and major openings from habitable rooms.
In circumstances where an existing dwelling is to be retained with new development at the rear of the property, there may be a requirement to demolish parts of a dwelling (such as garage or carport areas) to provide vehicle access to the rear lot(s). In this circumstance, the City will not permit a garage to be constructed unless it is located behind the alignment of the existing dwelling.
To increase the flexibility of this scenario, draft LPP 4.20 may permit a
carport within the front setback area, providing relevant provisions of the
R-Codes are met, and the appearance of the structure matches that of the
accompanying dwelling.
Administration considers that a carport, when appropriately designed, will soften the impact of vehicle storage in front of the dwelling and deliver a more aesthetically appealing streetscape outcome while minimising the impact of new developments on the existing character of the streetscape.
Street Surveillance
Administration considers it important that street surveillance be maintained as development occurs in recoded areas. Therefore, draft LPP 4.20 provides additional requirements for development proposals to demonstrate that the design principle of Clause 5.2.3 of the R-Codes (Street Surveillance) has been satisfied.
Currently, the design principles can be satisfied by providing one major opening to a habitable room facing the street. Draft LPP 4.20 proposes to require at least one major opening to a habitable room, balcony or veranda to provide uninterrupted views of all access points to the dwelling(s), including the primary street, secondary street, pedestrian access point and vehicle access legs.
Landscaping
Administration considers that there is an opportunity for new development in recoded areas to contribute to the greenery of the streetscape by appropriately landscaping front setback areas. This is accomplished by limiting the amount of hard stand area permitted in front setback areas to 50%, with the remaining 50% to comprise soft landscaping defined as turf, planting and/or trees. This aims to create a more attractive streetscape outcome, soften the impact of new development on existing character of the street and provide a higher quality movement network for pedestrians and cyclists.
Crossover Design
Administration considers that the width of vehicle access points at the crossover should be minimised in order to provide additional space for verge landscaping, street trees and on street parking opportunities.
For smaller scale developments, draft LPP 4.20 proposes to limit new crossovers to 3 metres in width at the lot boundary.
If a proposal comprises 5 or more dwellings, or if it must take vehicle access from a district distributor road, a larger crossover may be permitted, however, it cannot exceed a total width of 6m at the lot boundary.
Crossovers will not be permitted to conflict with existing street trees.
Noise Management
Any development occurring along Wanneroo Road or Mirrabooka Avenue is likely to be exposed to excessive noise pollution either now or in the near future. Consequently, it is important that this is addressed during the subdivision and/or development assessment process.
Provision for this has been provided for in DPS 2 as part of Amendment No. 119. Where an applicant seeks to subdivide or develop a parcel of land that directly abuts Wanneroo Road or Mirrabooka Avenue, they will be required to submit a Noise Management plan to address the potential for road transport noise and recommend noise mitigation measures.
The City’s planning approvals team will assess applications against the recommended noise mitigation measures and ensure they are appropriately integrated into the design of the proposal.
Conditions of Approval
Draft LPP 4.20 identifies a number of conditions of approval that are likely to be imposed either through the subdivision process (recommendation to the WAPC only) or development assessment process. Any one or more of the conditions may be applied at the discretion of the assessing officer, based on the individual circumstances of each proposal.
Appendices
LPP 4.20 includes a series of concept drawings for the purpose of providing guidance on the way in which grouped dwelling developments may be serviced by a single vehicle access point. These drawings are conceptual only, for the purpose of public advertising and Administration may engage professional assistance to finalise the drawings prior to adoption.
Sustainability Measures
Administration investigated the application of sustainability measures in split coded areas, reviewed other local government policies on this issue and made contact with other local government officers to gain feedback on the concept.
While the Policy seeks to achieve sustainable development outcomes by promoting increased density adjacent to existing facilities and services, increasing the retention of street trees, nature strips and landscaped front setbacks, the inclusion of more specific sustainability measures specific to building design is complex and requires further research and investigation. Administration presented a report on this matter to Council Forum on 15 March 2016 and is currently progressing work on this matter separately.
LPP 4.20 is required to be operational in the near future due to the recent gazettal of Amendment No. 119. To ensure that LPP 4.20 is not unduly delayed, no specific sustainability requirements have been included in the draft Policy.
Consultation
Clause 4(2) of the deemed provisions of DPS 2 requires a draft Local Planning Policy to be advertised for a minimum of 21 days. If agreed by Council, it is proposed to advertise draft LPP 4.20 for a period of 21 days in the following manner:
1. Advertisement in a local newspaper;
2. Display notice of the proposal in Council offices and on the City’s website; and
3. Referral in writing to affected persons or agencies as determined by the Director Planning and Sustainability.
Following the 21 day advertising period, a summary of submissions received and Administration’s responses to those submissions will be included in a report to Council to consider final adoption of draft LPP 4.20.
Comment
Administration considers that draft LPP 4.20: Split Coded Areas will provide appropriate guidance on the implementation of restricted vehicle access provisions in DPS 2 for applicants and assessing officers, and will enable infill development to occur in a coherent manner. Furthermore, draft LPP 4.20 provides additional guidance on the design of garages, street surveillance, landscaping and crossovers in recoding areas.
Given the fragmented nature of development in infill areas, poorly executed development may result in undesirable streetscape outcomes characterised by poor vehicle access, poor walkability, poor urban design, lack of available space for street trees and limited on street parking opportunities.
Draft LPP 4.20 aims to minimise the impact of future development by providing a series of clear provisions to address key components of residential design and vehicle access.
Administration considers that the implementation of sustainability measures in new development be addressed through a separate initiative to ensure its appropriate consideration and application. This will ensure that draft LPP 4.20 is not unduly delayed where possible. Additionally, further scheme amendments may be required to provide the necessary head of power to implement any sustainability measures considered necessary.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with clause 3 (1) of the deemed provision of DPS 2, Council may resolve to prepare and adopt a local planning policy to apply to any matter related to planning and development of the scheme area. A draft policy must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Draft LPP 4.20 only applies to land that is subject to a split density code. Administration acknowledges that some of the provisions contained in draft LPP 4.20 may be appropriate to be applied more broadly across the City of Wanneroo.
Given the recent approval and subsequent gazettal of Amendment No. 119, it is considered important that draft LPP 4.20 be progressed as quickly and efficiently as possible, in order to provide guidance to landowners wishing to prepare development proposals in the new split coded areas.
Administration considers a review of LPP 2.1: Residential Development would be best placed to capture any provisions included in this policy for the purpose of broad application in the City of Wanneroo. This would also be relevant for any sustainability measures that should be considered in all areas, rather than just those subject to a split density code.
Furthermore, it is important to clarify the relationship between draft LPP 4.20 and the work currently being undertaken by Administration to prepare draft LPP 4.10: Streetscapes (LPP 4.10).
While these two policies do share some characteristics, LPP 4.10 is primarily concerned with land contained with the road reserve in new development areas. LPP 4.20 deals with established areas where roads are already constructed and contains provisions that manipulate the way in which new infill developments interact with land in the road reserve.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council pursuant to clauses 4(1) and 4(2) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the draft Local Planning Policy 4.20 contained in Attachment 1 for the purpose of advertising and ADVERTISES draft Local Planning Policy 4.20: Split Coded Areas, for public comment for a period of 21 days, by way of the following:
1. Advertisement in the Wanneroo Times, Sun City News and the North Coast Times newspapers;
2. Notice of the proposal displayed in Council offices and on the City’s website; and
3. Letters to relevant stakeholders as determined by the Director, Planning and Sustainability.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Draft LPP 4.20 Split Coded Areas April 2016 |
16/142824 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 43
File Ref: 5523 – 16/150523
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a petition to extend Quinn’s dog beach 150m north to the existing beach access point, 60m south of Chippy’s Café, Jindalee.
Background
On 24 July 2012 (item PS04-07/12), Council endorsed the final Coastal Management Plan Part 1 (CMP Part 1). The final CMP Part 1 included a recommendation to extend the existing Quinn’s dog beach south 700m to the northern most access of the existing car park at Fred Stubbs Memorial Grove within the next five years.
On 4 February 2014 (item PS05-02/14) Council resolved to give 28 days notice of its intention to extend the Quinn’s dog beach, in accordance with the Dog Act 1976. Due to the existing erosion issues at Fred Stubbs Memorial Grove, it was proposed to only extend the existing Quinn’s dog beach south 320 metres, as shown in Attachment 1. The proposal generated a significant amount of public interest, particularly from residents of Quinn’s Rocks, with community feedback indicating that there was not strong support for the proposal.
As a consequence, on 29 April 2014 (item PS08-04/14), Council resolved not to extend Quinn’s Dog Beach. As part of this resolution, it was also resolved that Council:
“Gives NO FURTHER consideration to extending the dog beach at Quinns…and REQUIRES Administration to investigate the opportunity for additional dog beach locations along the City's foreshore as part of the preparation of the Coastal Management Plan (Part 2).”
Council also resolved to:
“REQUEST Administration implement recommendation 3 (the City liaises with PEET to finalise location and timing of a dog beach in North Alkimos) from the Coastal Management Plan Part 1 immediately and report back to Council by 22nd July on the progress made.”
Administration reported back to Council on the 22 July 2014 and confirmed that meetings with PEET and Stockland had occurred, to discuss future coastal planning and use options for the section of beach near the boundary between PEET's Shorehaven estate and Stockland's Amberton estate.
The general location of the Alkimos dog beach has since been identified as the section of beach between PEET’s Shorehaven estate and Stockland’s Amberton estate, approximately 6km north of Quinn’s dog beach. While the section of dog beach within the Shorehaven development was confirmed through Council’s adoption of the North Alkimos Foreshore Management Plan (December 2011), Administration has been unable to progress the formalisation of the Alkimos dog beach until such time as the Amberton Foreshore Management Plan (December 2015) was also endorsed.
Following Council’s adoption of the Amberton Foreshore Management Plan, Administration has completed further discussions with the landowners at Alkimos and Amberton, to determine the process and timing for establishing the Alkimos dog beach, which will provide dog owners with an alternative to the Quinn’s dog beach within the City.
Administration has commenced determination of the exact proximity of the beach and the timing of necessary supporting infrastructure is dependent on the staging of the individual land developments. It is intended that the dog beach be designated as soon as possible, prior to the majority of residents living in the adjacent properties. It is important to note that while Council can designate an area of beach as a dog exercise area, access to it is dependent on land developers providing the supporting infrastructure (access ways, bins, paths etc.) as per the approved Foreshore Management Plans. The landowners have advised that the infrastructure is not planned within the next two years.
Following further engagement with the landowners and the resolution of issues around access, management and supporting infrastructure it is intended that a report will be presented to Council recommending that Council resolves to give public notice of its intention to designate the relevant section of the North Alkimos beach as a dog exercise area.
At the 5 April 2016 Council Meeting, Council deferred a decision on the extension of the Quinn’s dog beach as a result of a deputation from the petitioner of PT02-02/16, and requested that the matter be presented to the next available Council Forum for discussion. The item was presented for information and discussion at the 3 May 2016 Council Forum and is now being presented to Council for reconsideration.
Detail
On 22 January 2016, a petition (PT02-02/16) of 1976 signatures was received by the City and subsequently presented at the 2 Feb 2016 Council Meeting. The petition requests an extension to the current Quinn’s dog beach, approximately 150m north of the current northern boundary, to the stairs adjacent to Chippy’s Café, as shown in Attachment 1.
In the letter, attached to the petition, the following issues are raised in support of the proposed extension:
1. Structural access
The petition states that there is currently no structural access to the dog beach at its northernmost limit and that when users want to exit to the north of the beach they have to do so by climbing a dune to access a stairway near Chippy’s café, 150m north of the boundary of the dog beach.
2. Dog owner representation
The petition states that 40% of households in the City own at least one dog and hence an equitable amount of coastline to support their use of the beach amounts to 13km.
3. Beach use
The petition states that observations of the Quinn’s dog beach during a four week period (mid December 2015 – mid January 2016) demonstrates that dog beach users outnumber general public beach users, in the area being requested for extension to the dog beach. No specific statistics on these observations were provided.
The petition claims that the area between the current northern boundary of the Quinn’s dog beach and the proposed extension to Chippy’s café is not a good swimming beach, consisting mostly of reef and would be more appropriately used for dog exercise.
Consultation
Section 31(3A) of the Dog Act states:
"A local government may, by absolute majority as defined in the Local Government Act 1995 Section 1.4, specify a public place, or class of public place, that is under the care, control or management of the local government to be a dog exercise area."
While no consultation has been undertaken in response to this petition, comprehensive community consultation was completed in 2014, essentially on the same issue, with community feedback received during the public notice period. The key issues raised in the submissions are summarised below:
1. Incompatibility of dogs with other beach users - The proposal to extend the dog beach south of the existing area was strongly objected to on the basis that dogs are not compatible with other beach uses.
2. Dog Management - Submitters reported that the dog beach, pedestrian access ways and surrounding areas are frequently impacted by dog faeces and the smell of dog urine. A number of reports were also made of uncontrolled dogs coming into conflict with other beach users (both dog and non-dog owners), thus discouraging some users from the area.
3. Carparking - Submitters were concerned that the lack of car parking would be exacerbated by the extension of the dog beach to the south.
Comment
An extension to the Quinn’s dog beach has been subject to a number of previous petitions and consultation exercises, most recently in response to the City’s CMP Part 1 which identified a gap in dog beach provision to the south of the existing Quinn’s dog beach, with the next closest dog beach being at Whitfords in the City of Joondalup. On that occasion, a southern extension was preferable over an extension to the north, because the beach north of the existing dog beach is narrow and characterised by the presence of rocky cliffs and submerged rocks. The beach area to the south of the existing dog beach is much wider and characterised by sand dunes with vegetation and is more amenable to public access.
At the time the CMP Part 1 was advertised for public comment (October 2011 to January 2012), the majority community view was in favour of a southern extension to the Quinn’s dog beach. However, this was met with strong community opposition in the 2014 public consultation. Previous public feedback raised valid concerns in relation to incompatibility with other beach users, management of the dog beach and car parking.
In response to the January 2016 petition (PT02-02/16), and as a result of historical community feedback and planned future developments, Administration advises the following:
1. Structural access
The petition states that there is no structural access from the dog beach in its northernmost limit and that dog beach users are using the access way approximately 60m north to obtain access to the dog beach.
Administration has inspected the various access points to the Quinn’s dog beach. Figures 1 – 10 of Attachment 2 illustrates these various access ways. The Quinn’s dog beach is approximately one kilometre in length with three main access points located along the length of the beach. Each access way consists of a concrete path leading down to the beach with nearby car park bays available.
The southernmost access point is located adjacent to the southern boundary of the dog beach (Figure 1). The central access point is located approximately half way along the length of the dog beach, adjacent to Queenscliff Parade (Figure 2 - 4). The concrete path access way leads from the carpark down to a stairway landing consisting of a sturdy grid mesh. This grid mesh enables smaller dogs to walk on this landing but is large enough to permit windblown sand to fall through the mesh to maintain a clear pedestrian path. The northernmost access point is located adjacent to the northern boundary of the dog beach. Whilst the concrete path leading to the beach is in good condition, the landing from the path to the beach is steep and has no stairway or similar structure (Figures 5 – 6). This makes access to the dog beach more difficult for dog beach users such as young children and the elderly.
The access way 60m north of the dog beach is adjacent to the Chippy’s Café, carpark and lookout balcony (Figures 7 – 10). The stairway landing, leading to the public beach below, can be seen looking south, from the balcony, adjacent to this carpark (Figure 7) and is adequately signed to educate beach users that dogs are not permitted on the beach below (Figure 8). The car park adjacent to Chippy’s Café is equipped with a dog waste bag facility and bin (Figure 10). The concrete path leading south from the carpark and lookout to this stairway, continues south to the northernmost access way and northern boundary of the dog beach. Hence the northernmost boundary of the dog beach is accessible from the Chippy’s café carpark.
2. Dog owner representation
The applicant expressed that 40% of households in the City own at least one dog and hence an equitable amount of coastline to support their use of the beach amounts to 13km.
Data analysed as part of the Coastal Management Plan Part 1 (2011), found that the City of Wanneroo has 9.75 registered dogs per metre of existing allocated dog beach. To date, this has increased to 10.39 registered dogs per metre of existing allocated dog beach. This is significantly lower in density in comparison to the City of Joondalup (25.2 dogs/m of allocated beach) or Stirling (21.79 dogs/m of allocated beach) and only marginally higher than the City of Cockburn (8.16 dogs/m of allocated beach).
This indicates that the current number of dog beaches within the City is still adequate to cater for dog exercise. In any event, Administration does not support 13km (approximately one third) of the City’s coastline to be dedicated to dog exercise. There are a number of alternative dog exercise areas, such as all public reserves in Quinn’s Rocks, vested in or under the care, control and management of the City of Wanneroo, excluding Frederick J Stubbs Grove, Quinn’s Rocks. Dog owners will also have the option of using the proposed Alkimos dog beach in the future.
3. Beach use
The petition states that observations during a four week period from mid December 2015 – mid January 2016 demonstrates that dog beach users outnumber general public beach users, in the area being requested for extension to the dog beach. This is to be expected, given that the primary swimming beach is located at Quinn’s Beach to the south.
The petition also states that the area of beach proposed for extension, is not a good swimming beach, constructed mostly of reef. This is consistent with Administration’s previous assessment of the area.
It has been previously acknowledged, in the 2014 public consultation, that incompatibility is already evident at the southern extent of the existing dog beach where dog users interact with other users of the beach. Considering the access point to this proposed northern boundary is adjacent to Chippy’s Café, an extension to the north of the current dog beach may cause further unwanted interactions.
Summary
On the basis of historical public feedback and the Council’s April 2014 decision to not consider any future proposed extension to Quinn’s dog beach, Administration does not recommend extending the Quinn’s Dog Beach to the north by 150 metres.
Alkimos dog beach is proposed to be located approximately 6km north of Quinn’s dog beach and will provide dog owners with an alternative to the Quinn’s dog beach within the City. The provision of alternative dog beaches will also be further addressed in the CMP Part 2.
Density data (dogs per metre of allocated beach) in comparison to nearby councils, demonstrates that the current dog beach resources in the City are currently adequate. It is also planned that any increase in future dog population increase will be alleviated with the proposed Alkimos dog beach, approximately 6km north of Quinn’s dog beach.
Furthermore, Administration does not support the interaction of public beach users and dog owners to the north, as the facilities adjacent to Chippy’s Café are a public gathering area.
Although the current access way at Chippy’s Café may be sufficient to cater for an extension to the dog beach to the north, the frequency of unwanted interactions of incompatible beach users (dogs, public beach users and café patrons) would likely increase.
It is recommended that improvements of the pedestrian access landing to the northern boundary of the dog beach be undertaken by Administration, to ensure that the safe and controlled access to the Quinn’s dog beach can be maintained in the future. A site inspection of the area, performed by Administration on the 13 April 2016, confirmed that the current access did not require any immediate works. In the future, emergency remedial work may require a vegetation permit to widen the access area, sand replenishment and an increase in the overall slope of the area. This may lead to further erosion of the access way and adjacent dune, which may exacerbate the problem. In the short term, Administration will continue to monitor and action the access way, as required.
The City appointed consultants AECOM in 2015 to assess various types of coastal infrastructure assets throughout its coastal zone. This report included the assessment of the northern access way and concluded that the main components of the northern access way (pathway and fencing) were noted to be in a reasonable condition. Relative to other beach access infrastructure requirements, the site was listed as Priority 15 of 21, with the current infrastructure having a remaining useful life of 13 years. However, the degree to which the access way is fit for purpose was not considered as part of this report and therefore not factored into generating the priority list.
In addition, Administration is intending to undertake an assessment of all access ways along the City’s coastline to determine if all existing access points are still required. Where there are multiple access points duplicated in short distances from one another, it will be determined if some access ways can be removed and the other access points upgraded to meet the community’s needs. This will assist the City by alleviating the pressures of maintaining the large amount of current access way structures.
The long term upgrade of Quinn’s dog beach infrastructure is also dependent on the works required as part of the Quinn’s Coastal Management Study. Two preferred coastal management options have been shortlisted and presented to the public:
· Option 1 – Extension of groynes 2 and 3, new northern groyne (groyne 4) and beach renourishment; and
· Option 2 – Relocation of the Quinn’s Beach carpark, new northern groyne (groyne 4) and beach renourishment.
A decision on the preferred option is currently pending community feedback and is intended to be considered at the 21 June 2016 Council Meeting.
Independent of which coastal option is selected, an upgrade to one of the Quinn’s coastal access ways will be required to enable large machinery to access the beach and undertake coastal protection works (eg. Groyne development/ extension works, coastal sand replenishment). If this particular access way is selected for machinery beach access, the current access way will need to be significantly altered and require further investigations, including the assessment of required geotechnical materials and beach seasonality studies. This current uncertainty makes it difficult to identify a clear option for dog beach access in the short term.
If Council decides to formally extend the existing Quinn’s dog beach, a number of additional works and initiatives will need to be considered, including:
· Public notice required under Section 31(3C)(b) of the Dog Act 1976; and
· Relocating the existing dog beach boundary sign to reflect the new (northern) dog beach boundary.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Section 31(3A) of the Dog Act 1976, public notice will be required if Council's approve the Quinn’s dog beach extension.
Under Section 31(3C)(b) of that Act, in order to formally extend the dog beach, Council must resolve to do so by absolute majority.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
If Council resolves to extend the dog beach, the following costs would need to be covered through the City's existing operational budget:
· The cost of public advertising in the North Coast Times and Wanneroo Times Community newspapers – approximately $640; and
· Relocation and installation of additional dog beach signs – approximately $1000. This cost will vary depending upon whether signs will need to be relocated ($200 each) or completely replaced (additional $200). Changes may also be required to existing signs on the northern and southern boundaries to reflect the increased length of dog beach.
There will be no additional cost to install appropriate bins and bag dispensers for the adjacent dog beach as these facilities already exist in the adjacent carpark, south of Chippy’s Café (Figure 10 in Attachment 2).
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the petition received in respect of the proposed northern extension of the Quinn’s dog beach, included in Attachment 1;
2. DOES NOT EXTEND the Quinn’s dog beach 150 metres immediately north of the existing Quinn’s dog beach;
3. REQUESTS Administration to improve the existing pedestrian access landing to the northern boundary of the Quinn’s dog beach; and
4. NOTIFIES the petition convener of Council's decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Proposed Extension 150m North of Quinns Dog Beach |
16/84985 |
Minuted |
|
2. |
Quinn's Dog Beach Access Point Photos |
16/81228 |
|
Figure 1: Southernmost access point to the dog beach
Figure 2: Central access point to the dog beach, with stairs onto beach
Figure 3: Central access point to the dog beach, with stairs onto beach.
Figure 4: Central access point to the dog beach - concrete path.
Figure 5: Northernmost access point to the dog beach, looking towards the beach.
Figure 6: Northernmost access point to the dog beach, looking towards the path.
Figure 7: View from balcony adjacent to Chippy’s café, looking south onto the dog beach. The stairs that descend onto the public beach can be seen in the left of the photo.
Figure 8: View of adjacent stairway access to the south of Chippy’s café, looking west towards the dog beach.
Figure 9: View of adjacent stairway access to the south of Chippy’s café, looking west towards the dog beach
Figure 10: Bins and dog waste bag facilities located in car park adjacent to stairway access, south of Chippy’s café.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 56
Approval Services
3.6 Application for Development Approval - Retaining Walls and Stairs at 17 Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks (DA2015/924)
File Ref: DA2015/924 – 15/518221
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider a development application for retaining walls and stairs at Lot 10 (17) Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks.
|
Applicant |
Turquoise Developments |
|
Owner |
Smartdevelop Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 10 (17) Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks |
|
Site Area |
3,033m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential (R40) |
Background
Lot 10 (17) Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks (the subject site) is located as indicated on the plan included as Attachment 1.
On 15 January 2015, Administration approved an application for development approval (DA2014/2245) for 23 multiple dwellings at the subject site. As part of the assessment of that proposal, Administration did not consult with nearby residents on the (then) proposed development as it was considered to fully comply with the relevant provisions of DPS 2 and the Residential Design Codes (R-Codes). Nearby residents became aware of the proposal to develop the lot and made enquiries and raised concerns with the City. Having regard to the issues raised, the City considered it appropriate to engage an independent planning consultant to review the planning approval process. Elected Members may recall that the Planning Report prepared by the consultant was circulated on 20 November 2015. Having regard to issues raised the City also met with residents on 2 December 2015 to discuss the Planning Report and address any concerns raised by residents into the planning approval process. Following the meeting, Administration provided information to residents who requested clarification and further details. Administration invited residents to contact Administration to enable any further concerns raised by residents to be addressed.
Administration issued a building permit on 14 May 2015 (BA2015/2190), to undertake preliminary site works (retaining walls and earthworks) to facilitate the development of the multiple dwellings. This building permit also proposed a design for stairs adjacent to the western boundary of the subject site that varied the design as prescribed in the development approval. The building permit approved the construction of retaining walls and stairs which facilitated earthworks; but did not approve the construction works for the multiple dwellings.
A further application for a building permit for the multiple dwellings was later received (BA2015/5112) and superseded the previous building permit (BA2015/2190). BA2015/5112 was approved by Administration on 2 November 2015. A site plan that was approved at the time that building permit BA2015/5112 was issued is included as Attachment 2, and is provided in the Elected Members’ Reading Room. The building permit was issued to facilitate the development of the approved planning application (DA2014/2245).
The planning approval (DA2014/2245) details the approved ground levels throughout the site, but did not specifically indicate the height of the retaining walls. The building permit was issued on the basis that the retaining would be required to facilitate the levels approved in the development approval.
The retaining walls and stair design approved in the building permits are now inconsistent with the development approval that was issued for the multiple dwellings. The purpose of this Report is for Council to issue an application for (partly) retrospective development approval (DA2015/924) for retaining walls and stairs on the subject lot, so that the development approvals and building permits are consistent with one another. The reason that the application is ‘partly’ retrospective is because – as outlined further in the ‘Detail’ section below – it seeks approval for existing development as well as for development not yet constructed. Specifically, works to construct the retaining wall in accordance with the building permit (BA2015/5112) have mostly been completed; the stairs adjacent to the western boundary are yet to be constructed.
Administration has received numerous enquiries from local residents about the multiple dwelling development that is currently under construction at 17 Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks. Administration is continuing to investigate any concerns as they arise. Administration does not consider that the application, subject to this Report, will alleviate all concerns raised by residents, but rather it is intended to address the inconsistencies that currently exist between the building permits and development approval.
Detail
Detail of the development subject to this Report is outlined below. A plan that highlights the extent of the works subject to this application is included as Attachment 3. This plan has also been provided in the Elected Members Reading Room.
The existing and proposed developments subject to this Report require development approval. The reason why development approval is required is because:
· The works described below were either not included in the initial development approval for the 23 multiple dwellings (DA2014/2245) or constructed in a manner inconsistent with this approval; and
· Such works are not exempt from approval under the deemed provisions contained within Schedule A of DPS 2.
The acceptance and assessment of the application subject to this Report forms a part of Administration’s ongoing measures to ensure that compliance for the works that have occurred (or are occurring) on the site is achieved.
Existing Development Requiring Retrospective Development Approval
Existing Retaining Walls and Stairs in Proximity to the Front Boundary
Existing retaining walls situated in the front setback of the subject lot are located where identified in yellow on the plan included as Attachment 3 and a photo of the development is shown in Attachment 5 (A). Stairs have also been built into this retaining wall.
The existing retaining walls and stairs were included in the plans issued as part of the building permit for the multiple dwellings (BA2015/5112). However, the initial development approval for the multiple dwellings (DA2014/2245) did not contemplate retaining walls or stairs being constructed within or adjacent to the front setback area.
The retaining walls and stairs were constructed as a result of excavation; and as such, the top of the retaining wall and stairs are at a level consistent with that of the adjoining Royal James Court road reserve. The building permit plans depicted retaining walls to a height of up to 1.2 metres, as measured from the bottom of the excavation that has occurred to the level of the road reserve.
Existing Retaining Walls Adjoining the Central Car Parking Area
Existing retaining walls situated in proximity to future car parking, approved as part of the 23 multiple dwelling development are located on the lot where identified in blue on the plan included as Attachment 3 and a photo of the development is shown in Attachment 5 (B).
The retaining walls were included in the plans issued as part of the building permit for the multiple dwellings (BA2015/5112). The initial development approval for the multiple dwellings (DA2014/2245) prescribed that a retaining wall of 0.5 metres in height would be constructed adjoining the carpark. However, the retaining wall heights on the building permit plans prescribe a varying retaining wall height of up to 1.1 metres.
Construction of this retaining wall is completed except for one section where indicated in Attachment 3. The applicant has advised Administration that the wall has not been completed, as completing the wall would restrict access through the site for heavy vehicles. Under the building permit, it is possible for the applicant to complete the construction of this section of the retaining wall at a later date.
Existing Retaining Walls for Sunken Planter Feature
Existing retaining walls set back 1.5 metres from the western boundary are shown in green on the plan included as Attachment 3 and photos of the development is shown in Attachment 5 (C). These retaining walls are intended to form part of a sunken planter feature to be developed adjoining the western boundary of the lot.
The existing retaining walls for the planter feature have been constructed at a height of between 0.5 metres to 0.6 metres, and parallel to the entire length of the western boundary (except for the section where stairs are provided). The existing retaining walls are included in the plans issued as part of the building permit for the multiple dwellings (BA2015/5112).
The initial development approval for the 23 multiple dwelling development however, included a planter feature which would be provided at a height of 1.2 metres adjoining a portion (but not the entire length) of the western side boundary. The applicant is seeking development approval for this retaining wall so that it will be consistent with that included in the approved building permit.
Existing Retaining Walls on Southern Boundary
An existing retaining wall situated adjoining the southern boundary is shown in pink on the plan included as Attachment 3 and a photo of the development is shown in Attachment 5 (D). This existing retaining wall has been constructed adjoining another retaining wall constructed at the time subdivision of the area was undertaken.
The existing retaining wall has been built up to a maximum height of 0.43 metres over the previously approved subdivision retaining wall. Retaining walls less than 0.5 metre in height do not require building permit approval under the Building Regulations, but require planning approval where the land use is a multiple dwelling in accordance with the provisions of DPS 2. The subject retaining wall is intended to retain the levels required for an adjoining drying yard and bin store. Detail of this existing retaining wall was included in the plans issued as part of the building permit for the multiple dwellings (BA2015/5112).
Although the initial development approval for the 23 multiple dwelling development showed a drying yard and bin store, the approval did not contemplate or show sufficient details of an additional retaining wall block that is required to maintain the levels of these facilities. The applicant is seeking development approval for this retaining wall so that it will be consistent with that included in the approved building permit.
Proposed Development Requiring Development Approval
In addition to the existing retaining walls described above, this applicant is also seeking approval for stairs situated on the western portion of the subject lot, as identified in red on the plan included as Attachment 3. The stairs have not yet been constructed.
Stairs at this location were approved as part of the initial approval for 23 multiple dwellings (DA2014/2245). The initial approval shows wide stairs that follow the angle of the retaining walls. The current application reduces the width of the stairs and leads directly to the access to Waterland Point as shown in Attachment 4. A photo of the location of the stairs is shown in Attachment 5 (E). The stair design proposed as part of this development application is consistent with the plans issued as part of the building permit for the multiple dwellings (BA2015/5112).
Consultation
Administration acknowledges that the site works to establish the levels approved for the multiple dwelling development is a subject of concern for nearby landowners. However, the retaining walls and stairs are required to facilitate levels that have already been approved and are not considered to warrant advertising, with exception of the retaining walls in the front setback area as indicated in yellow on the plan included as Attachment 3.
On 29 October 2015, Administration notified the affected adjoining landowner to the southeast (Lot 386, 15 Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks) requesting comment on the existing retaining wall and stairs situated in the front setback area by 12 November 2015. No response has been received by Administration.
Comment
As outlined in the ‘Consultation’ section above, Administration did not receive a comment from the adjoining landowner which it consulted with as part of the assessment of the application. Pursuant to the City’s Delegated Authority Register, Administration is typically not required to present an application for development approval for Council’s determination if no objections for the proposal have been received.
Administration has been engaging in ongoing dialogue with nearby landowners that have raised concerns about the multiple dwelling development that is currently under construction. As part of that dialogue, Administration has been responding to concerns about the broader issues of the development that is occurring on the site, and in particular the site works that have previously been undertaken to support the approved development. Whilst Administration continues to monitor the development and remains in dialogue with surrounding landowners, Administration considered it appropriate for this application to be presented to Council for its determination.
Administration has undertaken an assessment of the application against the requirements of the Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) as well as the City’s “Establishing Building Pad Levels, Excavation, Fill and Retaining Associated with Residential Development Local Planning Policy” (LPP 2.4). That assessment is provided for below:
Existing Retaining Walls and Stairs in Proximity to the Front Boundary
LPP 2.4 outlines that the principles of terracing are to be followed when filling within the front setback, as a way of meeting the performance criteria (design principles) of the R-Codes. As the retaining and site works that have occurred in the front setback area is excavation and not fill, then the principles of terracing do not apply. However, there is still a requirement for the proposal to satisfy the provisions of the R-Codes.
The deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes prescribe that excavation or filling within 3.0 metres of the front boundary shall not exceed 0.5 metres, except where necessary to provide for pedestrian and vehicle access. The application however, seeks development approval for excavation works and retaining walls that are not required to provide for pedestrian or vehicle access.
Where the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes have not been met, the proposal is to be considered against the relevant design principles of the R-Codes. An assessment of the retaining wall has been undertaken against the relevant design principles of the R-Codes, as provided in the table below:
|
Design Principles 6.3.6 Site Works |
Administration Comments |
|
Development that con-siders and responds to the natural features of the site and requires minimal excavation/fill. |
The retaining wall responds to the natural features of the site as the natural contours of the land falls from the street level (Royal James Court) to the western (or rear) boundary.
The design of the multiple dwelling development and car parking does not warrant the need for retaining within the front setback, except for where indicated in yellow on the plan included as Attachment 3. Administration considers that the design of the multiple dwelling development on the site confines retaining and excavation to a minimal area of the front setback.
|
|
Where excavation/fill is necessary, all finished levels respecting the natural ground level at the boundary of the site and the adjoining properties and as viewed from the street. |
The retaining walls and site works are necessary to facilitate the grading of the visitor bay in the front setback, and access in consideration of the natural ground levels at the front boundary and the adjoining street.
The retaining wall integrates well with the levels of adjoining properties. When viewed from the western boundary of the subject property there is a gradual rise to the street which is consistent with the finished levels established when the street was designed. When viewed from the street, the retaining walls are necessary to facilitate vehicle entry to the lot, which lessens the impact of the retaining wall and is considered appropriate when considering the natural ground levels of the adjoining properties. |
Considering that no objection was received from the adjoining landowner for the retaining wall within the front setback, and that it is demonstrated above that the proposal satisfies the design principles of the R-Codes, it is recommended that Council grants retrospective approval for the retaining wall.
Existing Retaining Walls (Adjoining the Central Car Parking Area & Planter Feature)
LPP 2.4 does not specifically prescribe requirements for retaining walls that are not located within 1.0 metre of boundaries or within front setbacks.
However, retaining walls not within the front setback and 1.0 metre from boundaries are subject to building height and setback requirements of the R-Codes. The existing retaining walls satisfy the requirements of the R-Codes, as the retaining walls:
· Do not exceed a height of 1.1 metres, which is less than the maximum wall height of 6.0 metres prescribed under the R-Codes; and
· Are setback at or greater than 1.5 metres from the boundary of the property, which is the minimum setback requirement prescribed under the R-Codes.
Existing Retaining Walls (Adjoining Southern Boundary)
The retaining walls adjoining the southern boundary have been constructed to a height of 0.43 metres above the natural ground level (the level adjoining the southern boundary before the site works on the site occurred), and therefore complies with the relevant deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes as well as the provisions of LPP 2.4.
Proposed Stairs
The proposed stairs are a building within a residential zoned property and is therefore required to meet the requirements of the R-Codes. The stairs are proposed on the side boundaries with adjoining Lot 4 (14) and Lot 5 (16) Waterland Point and do not satisfy the minimum setback of 1.0 metre required under deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes. Where the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes have not been met, the proposal is to be considered against the relevant design principles of the R-Codes. An assessment of the proposed stairs has been undertaken against the relevant design principles of the R-Codes, as provided in the table below:
|
Design Principles 6.1.4 Lot Boundary Setbacks |
Administration Comments |
|
Buildings set back from boundaries or adjacent buildings so as to: · Ensure adequate daylight, direct sun and ventilation for buildings and the open space associated with them; · Moderate the visual impact of building bulk on a neighbouring property; · Ensure access to daylight and direct sun for adjoining properties; and · Assist with the protection of privacy between adjoining properties.
|
The setback of the stairs will not prohibit sun and ventilation into the buildings situated on the adjoining lots (such as Lot 4 and Lot 5 Waterland Point). The proposed stairs are sufficiently setback from the lots to the southern boundary and will not prohibit sun or ventilation to the adjoining property.
The portion of stairs adjoining the side boundary is less than 1.0 metre in height above the natural ground level, and therefore will not have a significant effect of building bulk on the subject site or the adjoining lots;
The modified design of the stairs will not impede further on privacy, access to sunlight or ventilation on adjoining landowners, in comparison to the design of the stairs initially approved with the multiple dwelling development. |
Administration considers that the proposal satisfies the design principles of the R-Codes, and therefore it is recommended that Council grants development approval for the stairs.
Conclusion
This application for development approval complies with the applicable requirements of the R-Codes, and the City’s “Establishing Building Pad Levels, Excavation, Fill and Retaining Associated with Residential Development Local Planning Policy” (LPP 2.4). It is therefore recommended that Council approves the (partly) retrospective application for development approval for retaining walls and stairs at Lot 10 (17) Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City’s existing risk registers which relates to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
In accordance with the current Compliance Policy, the City may take various actions to deal with development that is constructed without approval. The initial steps seek to bring the matter into compliance. Where the landowner does not act to bring the matter into compliance, the City can take further action such as issuing a Directions Notice and/or Prosecution. In this case, the landowner has agreed to address the unapproved components of the development by seeking retrospective approval. If the application is approved by Council, no further action will be required.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the application for development approval for retaining walls and stairs at Lot 10 (17) Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks where highlighted on the plan included as Attachment 3, pursuant to Clause 68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 and subject to compliance with the following conditions:
a) This approval is only valid from the date of Council's decision and does not retrospectively authorise any previous unapproved development of the subject land.
b) This approval only relates to the retaining walls and stairs as highlighted on the site plan included in Attachment 3. It does not relate to any other development on the lot.
c) All stormwater shall be collected and retained on site.
2. ADVISES the applicant of Council’s decision; and
3. ADVISES nearby landowners of Council’s decision as nominated by the Manager Approval Services.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - 17 Royal James Court, Quinns Rocks |
16/4227 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Site Plan Included in Building Permit for BA2015 5112 |
16/50903 |
|
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - Extent of Development Subject to Application |
16/50904 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Attachment 4 - Stair Design Comparison |
16/35948 |
|
|
5. |
Attachment 5 - Royal James Court Multiple Dwellings - Council Report - Retrospective Planning Approval |
16/149293 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 71
File Ref: 8069 – 16/112338
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Central Alkimos Local Structure Plan No. 95 (LSP 95) to determine the modifications required and its acceptability to forward to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
|
Applicant |
Roberts Day |
|
Owner |
Landcorp |
|
Location |
Lot 9501 (2K) Marmion Avenue |
|
Site Area |
255 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban, Parks and Recreation, Other Regional Roads and Railways |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development, Parks and Recreation and Railways |
Background
The proposed LSP was submitted on 26 August 2013. On 9 October 2013, a memorandum was forwarded to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests were received and, as such, advertising of LSP 95 commenced on 21 October 2013 in accordance with former Clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and closed on 3 December 2013.
LSP 95 was advertised in conjunction with Draft Alkimos City Centre Structure Plan No. 89 (CSP 89) and Amendment No. 1 to Alkimos Eglinton District Structure Plan No. 18 (DSP 18). A plan showing the location of LSP 95 (green), CSP 89 (pink) and part of DSP 18 (outlined in blue) are included in Attachment 1. While Amendment No. 1 to DSP 18 was considered at its Council Meeting of 21 July 2015 (Item PS02-07/15) due to the number of submissions received regarding LSP 95 and CSP 89, Administration provided the proponent an opportunity to amend their proposals. Considerable review was undertaken including workshops with relevant state government stakeholders and on 2 November 2015 revised documentation for both LSP 95 and CSP 89 was provided to the City.
Due to the time lapse since advertising and the extent of changes to the proposal, LSP 95 and CSP 89 were referred back to the stakeholders who originally made submissions on the proposal. This resulted in further comments being made and in turn some further minor modifications were made by the applicant and on 18 April 2016 a final revision was submitted to the City. For clarity within this report this version will be identified as revised LSP 95 while the as lodged version from 26 August 2013 will be identified as the original LSP 95.
Following the consideration of LSP 95 together, with the submissions and resultant modifications Administration consider that LSP 95 is ready to be finalised. CSP 89, however, still has outstanding issues which are being worked through and it is the intent of Administration that it is presented to a Council Meeting later in the year.
Detail
Site
The LSP 95 area is bounded by the future Mitchell Freeway Reserve to the east, the foreshore reserve to the west, future residential development to the north, the Water Corporation's Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) and associated buffer to the south-west and the future Alkimos City Centre to the south-east. LSP 95 encompasses a total area of approximately 255 hectares.
Proposal
The original LSP, as shown in Attachment 2, was prepared to provide the broad planning framework to facilitate development of the area and to satisfy the requirements of DPS 2. The structure plan area is predominantly zoned Urban under the MRS, with two areas reserved for Parks and Recreation, and an Other Regional Roads reservation (Marmion Avenue) and railway reservation bisecting the site north-south.
The structure plan area is predominantly zoned Urban Development under the City's DPS 2, which requires the preparation of a structure plan to guide the subdivision and development of the land, in accordance with Clause 3.14.3 of DPS 2.
The LSP 95 will enable the delivery of the following:
· Primarily ‘Residential’-zoned land, with some areas of Regional & District Open Space, Education, Mixed Use and Business;
· An estimated lot yield of 1700, with 1816 dwellings and an estimated population of 4177;
· An estimated retail floor space of 1,300m²; and
· A high school and primary school site.
It is noted that the structure plan was initially earmarked for the inclusion of the North Alkimos Rail Station, however, this was removed by the Department of Transport ‘Public Transport for Perth in 2031’ plan and LSP 95 has been revised accordingly.
On 2 November 2015 the proponent provided a revised LSP Part 1 plan and text which is included as Attachment 3. While the reasons behind the revised document is discussed in the comment section of this report and within the summary of submissions included as Attachment 4, the revised LSP includes the following modifications:
· Part 1 text revision to be in line with the WAPC Structure Plan Preparation Guidelines;
· Reconfiguration of the District Open Space (DOS);
· Inclusion of a ‘Commercial’ zone in the area identified as Neighbourhood Centre under DSP 18;
· Inclusion of conservation Public Open Space;
· Relocation of the Primary School to the west of the railway reserve;
· A slight reduction in the estimated lot yield to 1605; and
· Minor realignment of the north-south District Distributor Road.
Consultation
The original LSP was advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times, North Coast Times and Sun City News newspapers, a notice on the City’s website and letters written to adjoining landowners.
The submission period commenced on 21 October 2013 and closed on 3 December 2013, with nine submissions being received from State Government agencies and two submissions being received from adjoining land developers.
On 23 December 2015, the revised LSP 95 was sent to the 11 stakeholders who made a submission during the initial public consultation period. These stakeholders were given 28 days to provide comment on the revised LSP 95. Six submitters (being the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Department of Planning (DoP), Department of Education, Peet Limited, Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and Public Transport Authority) provided additional submissions. A summary of submissions received and Administration’s responses are shown in Attachment 4.
The main issues raised during both the initial and subsequent advertising period relate to:
· The format of the Part 1 text and plan;
· The traffic modelling used in the preparation of the traffic report;
· Management of Regional Open Space (ROS); and
· The interface between the proposed high school site and Marmion Avenue (including pedestrian connections to the Alkimos City Centre).
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of LSP 95 is provided in the Comment section below.
Comment
Amended Part 1 Plan and Text
Through the consultation process and assessment of LSP 95, there were a number of changes to the LSP that were required. While it was deemed that none of these modifications impacted on the intent of LSP 95 the quantity of changes resulted in a document which looked substantially different from that originally lodged.
As such, and due to the legislative requirements, Administration is intending to recommend support to the proposal as submitted, subject to a modification to replace the document with that included in Attachment 3. This is deemed the simplest and most appropriate way to consider the structure plan.
The Part 1 text has also been modified to be in accordance with the WAPC's Structure Plan Preparation Guidelines including new provisions related to;
· Staging – Identifying that the development will be heavily reliant on the construction of the Mitchell Freeway extension to Alkimos Drive;
· Movement Network – Identifies the connection to major infrastructure will be generally as per the Part 1 Plan; and
· Density Targeting – Identifying the objective is to provide a minimum of 1605 dwellings within LSP 95.
The changes to the Part 1 text to include the above are minor and the overall replacement of the Part 1 text and plan is supported by Administration.
Traffic Modelling (Main Roads Western Australia Comments)
During the public consultation period, MRWA and Department of Transport raised concerns regarding the traffic modelling which was used for the development of both LSP 95 and CSP 89. Bruce Aulabaugh Traffic Consultant was engaged by the City to develop a North West Corridor Model (NWCM) in 2011 which is more detailed than the MRWA Regional Operation
Model 24 (ROM) where some existing traffic volumes already exceeded the ROM forecasts for 2031.
MRWA has required that the LSP 95 and CSP 89 be developed in accordance with ROM rather than NWCM. Jacobs Engineering Group was appointed by the proponent to review both the NWCM and ROM and noted the following;
· The road network in ROM does not include a number of important road links. This reduces the connectivity which concentrates too much traffic over too few roads; and
· The traffic volumes used in ROM are generally less than those in NWCM.
When undertaking a review of the original structure plan, the proponent and consultant engineers met with MRWA to establish an agreed position. The matter was not able to be resolved with MRWA restating its requirements for ROM to be used. The City, through consultation of the revised LSP 95, wrote to MRWA to establish the reasoning behind this decision. In response MRWA stated that they still had fundamental issues with the modelling, however, were willing to proceed with the matter and deal with issues at more detailed stages of development.
The City’s Traffic engineers support the use of the NWCM as it has been utilised through other structure plans within the City. Other comments raised by MRWA including intersection analysis can be dealt with through later stages of development. On this basis Administration supports the progression of LSP 95.
Location of the High School/Intersection of Marmion and Alkimos Drive
MRWA also raised issues with the location of the High School abutting Marmion Avenue as schools adjacent to regional roads are problematic due to access issues. MRWA also stated that this location creates concerns regarding pedestrian connectivity with the nearby ACSP 89 as well as vehicular access issues for parents dropping off and picking up students.
The proponent, through the Traffic Report submitted with LSP 95, has identified the intersection of Marmion Avenue and Alkimos Drive will be a four way signalised intersection. This is consistent with the Marmion Avenue Arterial Road Access - LPP 3.8 and will cater for the eventual extension of the Mitchell Freeway and subsequent flow on traffic onto Alkimos Drive. Signals at this intersection will allow for east-west pedestrian movement along Alkimos Drive across Marmion Avenue. MRWA have advised that due to the ongoing cost of maintenance of signals, roundabouts will be required unless it can be demonstrated that signals are essential.
MRWA have also identified that a grade separated pedestrian overpass should be provided by the proponent to ensure pedestrian connectivity. Administration agrees that an alternative pedestrian arrangement should be considered should the intersection become a roundabout in lieu of signals. As the decision for the intersection treatment is not made until subdivision stage, it is recommended that the LSP 95 Part 2 supporting documentation be updated to include provision for alternative arrangements based on the final intersection treatment.
With regards to the vehicular access, the high school site is bounded by a Neighbourhood Connector Road to the south and Integrator B Road to the north. These roads will allow alternative access to Marmion Avenue as there will be an access restriction on the eastern boundary of the site. A traffic report will be required to be submitted with the development application for the High School which will identify the detail associated with access and car parking for the site. Preliminary discussions with the Department of Education has identified that due to the topography of the site, buildings will be located to the west of the site which should alleviate any traffic concerns associated with Marmion Avenue. This would also eliminate any need for Marmion Avenue to be reduced to a 40km/hour zone which is not supported by MRWA.
It is considered that the reservations expressed by MRWA is a matter which can be addressed further between MRWA and DoP at subdivisional stage together with the City’s input and as such Administration is supportive of the location of the High School subject to updating the Part 2 documentation to include provision for alternative arrangements (including grade separated pedestrian connection) based on the final intersection treatment.
Management of Regional Open Space (Land designated as Parks and Recreation)
During the consultation period, the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) identified the need for environmental management plans to manage the potential impacts from the development on the Regional Open Space (ROS) which covers 39.2% of the LSP. The ROS is differentiated from the District Open Space (DOS) as it is for conservation purposes while the DOS is for active playing fields.
A meeting was held with the DoP, DPaW, City Administration and the proponents to discuss the responsibility for preparation of an ROS Management Plan and who will be responsible for the ongoing management of the various portions of the ROS. DoP officers identified that due to the size and significance of the ROS the development of the management plan is the responsibility of the WAPC and DoP, however, this is subject to funding which is not currently available. It was agreed that the management plan would ideally be prepared over the entire ROS area, from the coastal foreshore through to Wanneroo Road (including the WWTP conservation area). Due to the provisions within the Part 1 text this ROS Management Plan would be required before any works being undertaken.
In respect to the ongoing management of the various portions of the ROS, it was agreed that this would be dependent on the ultimate use and size of each portion. A plan was presented by the proponent (See Attachment 5) for the entire ROS (including lots outside of LSP 95) which split the various sites by function and management responsibility.
In addition to the environmental management plan, the Part 1 text also requires that conservation management plans are required to be submitted with any subdivision associated with any ROS lots to identify the remedial works required to be undertaken prior to being handed over to the final management body.
Administration is supportive of the use of environmental management plans and conservation management plans during later stages of development as this has worked in other similar circumstances (including Tamala Conservation Park Establishment Plan).
Reconfiguration of the District Open Space
In addition to discussions held regarding the management of the ROS, the location and configuration of the DOS was also discussed. While previously the DOS was located centrally within the ROS this created smaller ROS sites to the north and south which are not as good to manage. As such the DOS was relocated to the northern boundary abutting Alkimos Drive which allows the creation of one ROS site.
The proponent has provided a number of alternative designs which show the site is capable of being developed within the area designated including multiple use fields with a pavilion through to an Indoor Recreation Centre. The exact detail will be provided at later stages of development but the site is considered to be sufficient for the City’s needs as considered by the City’s Community Facility Planning service unit.
Inclusion of Commercial Zone
Amendment No. 1 to DSP 18 was submitted to the City on 26 August 2013 proposing modifications related to the area zoned Service Commercial, area for the secondary and
district centres, removal of reference to the PTA Park and Ride Station on Alkimos Drive and the relocation/removal of the Neighbourhood Centre associated with Alkimos Station. Amendment No. 1 to DSP 18 was considered at the Council Meeting of 21 July 2015 (Item PS02-07/15). Council resolved to support Amendment No. 1 to DSP subject to modifications and on 14 September 2015 the documentation was referred to the WAPC.
On 18 March 2016, the WAPC advised that it supported the Amendment No. 1 subject to a modification requiring the neighbourhood centre, situated at the crossing of Alkimos Drive over the northern suburbs railway, being retained as it currently exists on Plan 1. The previous version of LSP 95 only included ‘Business’ and ‘Mixed Use’ zones within this area which do not permit the uses of shop or supermarket. Due to the retention of the neighbourhood centre in DSP 18 the revised LSP 95 includes an area of 6,000m2 of ‘Commercial’ zoned land south of Alkimos Drive. The location was selected due to the topography as well as surrounding road network. The location of the ‘Commercial’ zone will allow for convenience sales for people commuting, but not wanting to go into the Alkimos City Centre, and will increase the Employment Self Sufficiency of LSP 95. On this basis Administration is supportive of the inclusion of the ‘Commercial’ zone.
Requirements for Residential Medium-Density Single House Development Provisions
The Residential Medium-Density single house development provisions (R-MD) are provisions released by the WAPC which outlines acceptable variations to the deemed-to-comply provisions of the Residential Design Codes.
Prior to consideration of LSP 95, Administration undertook discussion and consultation with the proponent and the DoP regarding the procedure associated with the inclusion of R-MD codes and provisions within the structure plan. The DoP has advised that due to the non-statutory nature of structure plans following the implementation of the Planning and Development Regulations 2015, a local planning policy (LPP) is required to be drafted by the City which contains these R-MD provisions. On 1 April 2016 DoP released a revised Planning Bulletin which includes these R-MD provisions. Administration is currently working on a draft LPP 4.15 Medium-density single house development standards (R-MD Codes) and is intended to be presented to a Council Meeting.
The revised Part 1 text identifies that development within this LSP is subject to the R-MD provisions. The R-MD provisions are supported within structure plans as it will standardise variations to the R-Codes and also reduce the proliferation of Local Development Plans.
Updates to Part 2
In addition to the recommended modification to consider the revised Part 1 text and plan, it is considered appropriate that a modification be required to update the Part 2 text in accordance with the revised Part 1. These modifications will ensure that the Part 2 documents are updated in accordance with items raised in this report and recommendations made in the schedule of submissions within Attachment 4.
Conclusion
Considering the above comments, the proposed LSP 95 is considered to be acceptable, subject to modifications to replace the lodged structure plan with that provided to the City upon further consultation (Attachment 3). In addition, it is recommended that further modifications are imposed requiring the update of Part 2 documentation in accordance with changes to the Part 1 plan and text.
Statutory Compliance
This structure plan will follow the statutory process outlined in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Administration's assessment of LSP 95 has been undertaken in accordance with Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to subclause 20(2)(e) of the deemed provisions of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 RECOMMENDS to the Western Australian Planning Commission that the proposed Local Structure Plan No. 95 be approved subject to the following modifications:
a) That the Part 1 text and plan be replaced by Attachment 3 to this report; and
b) That Part 2 be modified in accordance with changes required under 1(a) of this resolution and the recommendation column of Attachment 4 to this report.
2. FORWARDS a copy of the report on the proposed Local Structure Plan No. 95 to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
3. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Locational Plans (including LSP 95, CSP 89 & DSP 18) |
16/125566 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - As lodged Structure Plan Part 1 (Text and Map) |
16/125290 |
|
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - Revised Structure Plan Part 1 (Text and Map) |
16/125288 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Attachment 4 - Schedule of Submissions |
16/148285 |
Minuted |
|
5. |
Attachment 5 - Regional Open Space Management Plan |
16/148586 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 113
Land Development
3.8 Subdivisional Retaining Walls Over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep WAPC 152589
File Ref: SD152589 – 16/92634
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider approval of a subdivisional development retaining wall within Lot 499 St Andrews Drive, Yanchep (WAPC 152589) on behalf of the applicant, the Building Development Group Pty Ltd.
The retaining wall over 4m in height, the subject of this report, is located in common property as shown on Attachment 1.
Background
Council’s Subdivisional Retaining Wall Local Planning Policy (LPP 4.5) states that:
1. For proposed retaining walls abutting a road reserve, walls greater than 3.0m in height will be unacceptable unless the City is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist.
2. For internal retaining walls on the common boundary, walls greater than 4.0m in height will be unacceptable unless the City is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist.
This report provides details of the exceptional circumstances for Council's consideration.
On 22 December 2015, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) granted subdivision approval of Lot 499 into 4 lots, Lots 886, 887, 889 and 888 (WAPC 152589). Subsequent subdivision application for Lot 886 has been lodged proposing a combination of single lots and survey strata lots. This subdivision is yet to be approved. A copy of this subdivision plan is shown on Attachment 2.
Detail
The topography of the site is such that extensive retaining is required. Refer to cross-sections and photographs included as Attachments 3 and 4.
The site slopes from the North West to South East corner. To address this difference in level, the applicant is proposing to construct a terraced retaining wall reaching a maximum height of 5.5m on the boundary between lots 887, 889 and 886 as shown on Attachment 1. An additional retaining wall will be required on the eastern boundary of Lot 886 where it abuts with the golf course (Lot 888). However, as this retaining wall is less than 4.0m in height, it is acceptable under the provision of LPP 4.5 and is therefore not being considered in this report.
The following rationale has been provided for the justification to the approval of the retaining wall on the northern boundary of Lot 886 shown in Attachment 1.
The design constraint includes tying-in of the existing sewer line to the proposed Lot 889 and the 8 metre fall between the St Andrews Drive verge, and the eastern boundary of Lot 886 (Attachment 1).
The proposed retaining wall will allow a new access road to the subdivided lots within Lot 886 to be constructed adjacent to St Andrews Drive. There would then be a further retaining wall at the boundary between those lots and the golf course. This is shown in Section B of Attachment 3.
The retaining wall is proposed as a “stepped” wall utilising precast concrete panels treated with a limestone style finish. The 2.5m separation between the two stepping panels will be landscaped with appropriate species that will in time fall over and cover, in part, the lower wall to reduce its visual impact. This is shown in Detail 1 of Attachment 3.
Approval to construct retaining wall exceeding 4m in height at the common boundary between Lot 887, 889 and Lot 886 is now requested.
Consultation
The LPP 4.5 requires consultation for walls greater than 2.5m and up to 4.0m in height which abuts land in separate private ownership. The eastern boundary in between Lot 886 and 888 requires a retaining wall greater than 2.5m and is under separate private ownership. The owner of the abutting Lot 888, has provided written confirmation that they do not object to the retaining wall (Attachment 5)
The retaining wall under this application is higher than 2.5m, however, as it is not abutting land in separate private ownership, in accordance with LPP 4.5, no consultation is required.
Comment
Under LPP 4.5, the City may consider variations to the acceptable maximum heights for a retaining wall where in the City’s opinion, the wall is necessary to:
1. Facilitate the minimum standard required to service the proposed Lots with sewer, power, water and other essential services; and
2. Retain the visual impression of the natural landform within the locality.
Administration has assessed and supports this variation to the acceptable maximum height based on the need to coordinate ground levels with the steep existing topography surrounding the subject development and to enable the creation of level lots that can be connected to existing sewer services and public roads.
It is therefore recommended that the proposed retaining wall up to 5.5m in height be approved.
Statutory Compliance
A Building Licence is necessary for all retaining walls before construction can commence.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Application for approval to construct retaining walls up to 5.5m in height abutting the road reserve and up to 5.5m in height on the common boundary of the subdivision, has been assessed in accordance with LPP 4.5.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council AUTHORISES approval of the retaining walls proposed for Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep (WAPC 152589), up to 5.5m retained height adjacent to the road reserve, between the common boundary of Lots 887, 889 and 886, as per the application drawings contained in Attachments 1 and 3.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Subdivisional Retaining Wall Over 4m Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep Attachment 1 |
16/110578 |
Minuted |
|
2. |
Subdivisional Retaining Wall Over 4m Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep Attachment 2 |
16/150850 |
|
|
3. |
Subdivisional Retaining Wall Over 4m Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep Attachment 3 |
16/110571 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Subdivisional Retaining Wall Over 4m Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep Attachment 4 |
16/110565 |
|
|
5. |
Subdivisional Retaining Wall Over 4m Lot 499 St Andrews Drive Yanchep Attachment 5 |
16/150846 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 127
3.9 Subdivisional Retaining Walls over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lot 9001 (#30) Capri Leone Way Sinagra WAPC 150612
File Ref: SD150612 – 16/65442
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider approval of subdivisional development retaining walls at Lot 9001 (#30) Capri Leone Way, Sinagra (WAPC 150612) on behalf of the applicants Marin and Judith Garbin.
Background
Council’s Subdivisional Retaining Wall Local Planning Policy 4.5 states that:
1. For internal retaining walls on the common boundary, walls greater than 4.0m in height will be unacceptable unless the City is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist.
This report provides details of the exceptional circumstances for Council's consideration.
The subject land is located within East Wanneroo Cell 2 (Sinagra) ASP No. 4. On 1 December 2014, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) granted subdivisional approval for 9 lots, as shown in Attachment 1, ranging from 347m2 to 504m2 (WAPC 150612).
Detail
Engineering drawings have been submitted by the Engineering Consultant, Tadros Engineering, on behalf of the developer/owner depicting retaining wall heights up to 5.55m on the common boundary within the same subdivision area (Attachment 1 and 2).
The following rational has been provided for justification for the approval of the retaining wall on the north-east boundary of Lot 109 shown in Attachment 1.
The proposed level of Lot 109 is to be coordinated with existing levels of Floresta Street and the proposed level of Lot 104 which is to be coordinated with the existing Capri Leone Way, resulting in a significant level drop of approximately 5.6m between proposed level of Lots 104 and 109 (Attachment 2).
Proposed levels of Lots 107,108,114 and 115 are primarily driven by the proposed levels of Francina View Francina View design levels are driven by the natural topography of the site, and the requirement to match into existing levels of Floresta Street to the south and Torrenova Way/Capri Leone Way intersection to the north (Attachment 2).
The proposed retaining wall between Lots 104, 107 and Lot 109 is an extension of an existing retaining wall at the boundary of existing Lot 351 (Attachments 2 and 3).
Approval to construct retaining walls exceeding 4m in height at common boundary between Lots 104, 107 and Lot 109 is now requested.
Consultation
The LPP 4.5 requires consultation for walls greater than 2.5m and up to 4.0m in height which abuts land in separate private ownership.
The retaining wall under this application is higher than 2.5m, however, as it is not abutting land in separate private ownership, in accordance with LPP 4.5, no consultation is required.
Comment
Under LPP 4.5, the City may consider variations to the acceptable maximum heights for a retaining wall where in the City’s opinion, the wall is necessary to:
1. Maintain the character and consistency of other retaining walls within the subdivision area; and
2. Retain the visual impression of the natural landform within the locality.
Administration has assessed and supports this variation to the acceptable maximum height based on the need to coordinate ground levels with the steep existing topography surrounding the subject development and to enable the creation of level lots that can be connected to existing public roads.
It is therefore recommended that proposed retaining walls up to 5.55m in height as shown in Attachment 2 be approved.
Statutory Compliance
A Building Licence is necessary for all retaining walls before construction can commence.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Application for approval to construct retaining walls exceeding 4m and up to 5.55m in height on common boundary within the same subdivision area, has been accessed in accordance with LPP 4.5.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple majority
That Council AUTHORISES approval of the retaining wall proposed for Lot 9001 (#30) Capri Leone Way, Sinagra (WAPC 150612), up to 5.55m in height on common boundary between Lots 104, 107 and Lot 109 as per the application drawing contained in Attachment 2.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachmen 1 - Location Plan - Lot 9001 (#30) Capri Leone Way Sinagra WAPC 150612 |
16/84570 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Wall Heights - Lot 9001 (#30) Capri Leone Way Sinagra WAPC 150612 |
16/84575 |
Minuted |
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - Retaining Wall Profiles - Lot 9001 Capri Leone Way Sinagra WAPC 150612 |
16/84578 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 133
Assets
File Ref: 3125V02 – 16/131882
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a petition requesting closure of Parin Road at the intersection of Wanneroo Road to make it a Cul-de-Sac.
Background
Council, at its meeting of 2 February 2016 received a petition (PT01-01/16) with 34 signatories representing 22 properties and reads as follows:
“We, the residents of Parin Road Marangaroo, propose the closing of its entrance/exit from Wanneroo Road – making this area into a cul de sac. We propose this is better traffic management, and more importantly, the safety for us as residents here. We also are considering safer surrounds for the child care center who are on the corner of Parin and Wanneroo Roads, making them a prime accident point.”
In addition, Council at the same meeting (2 February 2016) considered a report (Item AS01-01/16 refers) which considered the results of community consultation for the installation of a traffic management scheme along Parin Road and resolved as follows;
“That Council:-
1. APPROVES the revised Traffic Management Scheme – Option 3 (horizontal deflections similar to San Rosa Road), for Parin Road, Marangaroo, as detailed in City Drawing No. 3191-1-1 (Attachment 9 refers) at an estimated cost of $180,000;
2. NOTES that the additional $90,000 funding is required to be allocated in 2016/2017 Capital Works Program to fully complete the works for PR-2982 – Parin Road Traffic Management Scheme; and
3. ADVISES the residents of Parin Road of Council’s decision.”
Refer to Attachment 1 for a location map of Parin Road, Marangaroo.
Detail
Parin Road is listed as a Local Distributor Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy. The purpose of such a road is to maintain movement of traffic within local areas and connect access roads to District and Primary Distributors such as Wanneroo Road, Hepburn Avenue and Marangaroo Drive. Parin Road serves as a direct access to 31 properties and provides connection to another 615 properties bound between Hepburn Avenue, Wanneroo Road, Marangaroo Drive and Aylesford Drive. It has a 10m wide pavement with a 2m wide central median. A 1.2m wide footpath is located on the south side of Parin Road to cater for pedestrians and extends for the full length of the road.
A Childcare Centre is located 40m from Wanneroo Road on the south side of Parin Road at the corner of the Wanneroo Road intersection. It should be noted that the Childcare Centre did not sign the petition.
The part of Marangaroo, west of Marangaroo Golf Course is connected by two Local Distributor Roads Parin Road and Giralt Road which feed into other Distributor Roads such as Wanneroo Road, Hepburn Avenue and Marangaroo Drive. This area has the below three intersection connections to the Distributor network:
· Intersection of Giralt Road and Hepburn Avenue;
· Intersection of Parin Road and Wanneroo Road; and
· Intersection of Giralt Road and Marangaroo Drive.
As a Local Distributor Road, this road has the capacity to accommodate traffic volumes up to 6,000 vehicles per day. The Average Weekday Traffic counts recorded for this road have been in the region of 3,000 vehicles per day which indicates that Parin Road is functioning well within its capacity. The road operates under the default Built-Up-Area speed limit of 50Km/hr. However, traffic count data collected shows that the 85th Percentile speed (operating speed) of Parin Road is 64Km/hr.
Consultation
Residents were recently consulted as part of the Traffic Management Scheme proposal for Parin Road. The process undertaken was as follows;
15 May 2015 Residents were consulted on a proposal to install a speed cushion treatment along Parin Road
1 June 2015 Consultation Closed.
- 56% Support to 44% Against.
2 Nov 2015 Re-consultation with residents on two alternative options;
- Chicane Treatment, with minor modifications to the central median
- Lane width restriction with 1m shoulder linemarking.
23 Nov 2015 Consultation Closed.
- Chicane Treatment = 63%, Lane width restriction = 25% and Neither Option = 12%
2 Feb 2016 Council considered report on consultation results. Council resolved to proceed with the construction of the chicane treatment in 2016/2017 in Traffic Treatments in the Long Term Capital Works Program.
Therefore, no further consultation has been undertaken with residents regarding the modification of Parin Road to become a cul-de-sac at Wanneroo Road.
Comment
Parin Road and Giralt Road are the roads which provide connection for the 615 residents of Marangaroo (west of Marangaroo Golf Course) to the arterial road network. Local Distributor roads all work together to effectively distribute the traffic on to the network. The connection of a Local Distributor such as Parin Road to a Primary Distributor such as Wanneroo Road is common practice throughout the City. Templeton Crescent in Girrawheen, Kingsway and Dalecross Avenue in Madeley, East Road in Pearsall, Kirkstall Drive and Gungurru Road in Hocking are examples of such connections in the same corridor.
The disconnection of Parin Road from Wanneroo Road would result in Giralt Road being the only road which services 615 properties in the area. The current traffic volume on Giralt Road adjacent to Parin Road is 4,310 vehicles per day (vpd). It’s expected that the disconnection of Parin Road from Wanneroo Road would force the traffic on Parin Road to travel on Giralt Road taking the traffic volume on Giralt Road to above 7,000 vpd which is more than the expected traffic volume for a Local Distributor Road (6,000 vpd). This would also result in increased congestion, increased queue lengths and decreased level of service on Giralt Road/Hepburn Avenue and Giralt Road/Marangaroo Drive intersection. The increased traffic volume and over-expected capacity will also have negative safety implications on the road network.
In response to the reference in the petition regarding the likelihood of an accident occurring near the Jellybeans Childcare Centre the following points need be considered. It should be noted that no crashes have occurred as a result of traffic entering or exiting the facility. The childcare centre is located on the corner of Parin Road and Wanneroo Road. Motorists heading west along Parin Road are already slowing on approach to the Wanneroo Road intersection and therefore reducing speed adjacent to the facility. Motorists heading east along Parin Road are able to pass around the outside of cars waiting to turn right into the childcare due to the presence of a painted right-turn lane. Cars exiting the childcare centre are choosing to do so when the road is clear of traffic. This entry and exit scenario combined with the fact that Parin Road operates under a 50km/hr speed environment should result in a low crash probability at this location.
The City is addressing issues of speeding and rat running along Parin Road by implementing a Traffic Management Scheme as endorsed by Council in February 2016 and by sending traffic data to WA Police for increased enforcement. These construction works are scheduled to commence in June 2016.
Considering the purpose of the road within the road network, the negative effect of increased traffic volume on other key roads & intersections and the planned construction of traffic treatments along Parin Road, the modification of Parin Road at its intersection with Wanneroo Road to a cul-de-sac is not supported by Administration.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.3 Easy to Get Around - The community is well connected and accessible with an integrated transport approach for all.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT SUPPORT the modification of Parin Road to convert it into a cul-de-sac at its intersection with Wanneroo Road;
2. NOTES that Administration will write to WA Police and provide traffic data for Parin Road requesting increased enforcement; and
3. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
localityPlan_ParinRd_TMS |
15/234805 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 138
3.11 Contribution towards Installation of Traffic Signals at Alexander Drive/ Illawarra Crescent Intersection
File Ref: 19407 – 16/144691
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To receive an update on the project completion analysis and consider payment of the final contribution to City of Swan for the Installation of Traffic Signals at Alexander Drive/ Illawarra Crescent Intersection.
Background
Council considered a report (Item IN01-11/15 refers) at its meeting on 10 November 2015 to consider budget variations due to variances between estimated grant funding within the adopted 2015/2016 Capital Works Program and actual grant funding agreements received by the City during the financial year. A number of recommendations were adopted including the following:
“That Council:
1. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure listed in the following table, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for contribution towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alexander Drive and Illawarra Crescent in Ballajura, as follows:
EXPENDITURE
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Adjusted Budget |
|
Alexander Drive/ Illawarra Crescent Traffic Signals |
PR-2474 |
$0 |
$110,000 |
2. NOTES that at this stage, a payment of $55,000 will be made to the City of Swan as contribution towards traffic signal installation at the intersection of Alexander Drive and Illawarra Crescent in Ballajura with the further payment subject to the consideration of a separate report by Council on the review of the project cost variances and the benefit-cost-ratios;”
In accordance with the Council’s decisions, a payment of $55,000 has been made to the City of Swan and this report now considers an analysis of the information received from the City of Swan on the project cost escalations and subsequent recommendation.
Detail
The installation of traffic signals at Alexander Drive and Illawarra Crescent was identified as a traffic treatment in response to issues experienced by residents of both Alexander Drive and Illawarra Crescent and the need to reduce speed on Alexander Drive between Marangaroo Drive and Hepburn Avenue. Alexander Drive is a boundary between the City of Swan and Wanneroo and accordingly it was agreed to jointly fund the municipal component of this project.
It was noted in the report (Item IN01-11/15 refers) considered by Council at its meeting on 10 November 2015 that in 2011/2012 the City agreed to partially fund a project delivered by the City of Swan for traffic signal installation at the intersection of Alexander Drive and Illawarra Crescent in Ballajura for $50,000. These funds were included in the City’s 2014/2015 Capital Works Budget. The project experienced delays in completion due to several factors and completion only occurred in 2015/2016. This project received National Black Spot Program funding ($330,000) in 2014/2015 and initially was removed from the City’s Capital Works Program as no municipal funding was anticipated to be required. Accordingly, the City did not retain this contribution on the adopted 2015/2016 Capital Works Budget.
Late in May 2015, when the City’s 2015/2016 draft budget was finalised prior to adoption, the City of Swan advised that a review of the cost of this project had been completed, which resulted in the project cost to be $551,531. The City of Swan requested a contribution totalling $110,000 from the City of Wanneroo in 2015/2016 to facilitate the finalisation of this project. The City of Swan indicated that the cost escalation resulted from significant expenses in relation to the adjustment of Telstra infrastructure which were not included in the original cost estimate.
It was also proposed to allocate $110,000 in municipal funding for this project in the City’s Capital Works Program and make a payment of $55,000 the City of Swan with the further balance payment subject to the consideration of a separate report by Council on the review of the project cost variances and the benefit-cost-ratios.
The City of Swan has provided details of the original cost estimates (included in the project submission seeking the allocation of Black Spot Program funding), the final project expenditures and comments on variances as summarised below:
|
Item |
Actual cost |
Estimated Cost |
Comments on variances |
|
Traffic Signals |
$195,138.58 |
$125,000 |
$125,000 was a preliminary cost estimate used at the time when the funding was applied for and was based on a desktop analysis of the site conditions by Main Roads WA.
Cost increases arose due to: a) compliance with ATCO gas requirements due to the presence of an existing high pressure (HP) gas running along Alexander Drive which resulted in: · the need to move the traffic signal pole locations so they were not installed directly on top of the HP gas main; · the crew on site needing to take additional safety precautions and therefore took longer to complete the job than originally anticipated; · additional costs associated with the attendance by an approved Locater for all activities/works.
b) The need to install an unmetered supply pit by Western Power for the power supply of the traffic signals. Time restrictions to working on Alexander Drive due to high traffic volumes, resulted in an increase in the labour and traffic management costs.
|
|
Civil Works including Traffic management and landscaping |
$155,965.11 |
$130,000 |
The cost of materials and labours increased as the original cost estimate was done nearly two years before the work was actually carried out. Landscaping works including the installation of concrete stencil paving in the two median islands of Alexander Drive were also undertaken that were not included in the original cost estimate. |
|
Signs and lines |
$11,287.14 |
$10,000 |
Increase in materials and labours costs since the preparation of estimate nearly two years before the work was actually carried out. |
|
New Street Lighting |
$36,614.85 |
$15,000 |
Two new street lights and replacement of several existing luminaires on existing poles in Alexander Drive was required to comply with the current standards. This was identified during the detailed design stage of these works. The cost estimate only allowed for an upgrade of the existing lights.
|
|
Service pit relocations |
$184,403.86 |
$50,000 |
A Telstra fibre optic pit had to be relocated to accommodate the road widening which was identified during the detailed designs. The cost estimate for this relocation was based on past projects of a similar nature noting that estimating utility relocation costs is particularly difficult as the exact nature and cost can only be determined by the utility.
The scope of work involved: · Telstra needed to install two new pits, one approx. 25m east of the existing pit and the other one 100m north of the existing pit and haul fibre optic cables (approx. 1400m), through the existing network; · Lowering of the existing conduits at the north east corner of Alexander Dr/Illawarra Crescent North to accommodate the road widening and encased them in concrete; and · Implementation of a traffic management on site for the above works.
|
|
Total cost |
$583,409.53 |
$330,000 |
|
It has been noted from the information provided by the City of Swan that:
· these cost escalations were identified prior to the construction works noting that the estimated cost of $330,000 was a preliminary estimate and used to apply for a Black Spot funding (i.e. no detailed design had been carried out at that stage);
· The preliminary cost estimate was based on previous projects of a similar nature that the City has completed. However, it is likely that there would be some variance in the cost estimate especially where no detailed designs had been done and no quotes from third parties can be obtained;
· The cost escalations came from works required by Main Roads WA, Telstra, and Western Power. It is always difficult to prepare accurate cost estimates for these because they vary greatly from project to project. The agencies responsible are the only ones who are permitted to work on their own infrastructure and generally local authorities do not have control over these costs; and
· Time restrictions to working on Alexander Drive due to high traffic volumes, resulted in an increase in the labour and traffic management costs.
Regarding the Benefit Cost Ratios, following summary of provided:
· Black Spot submission 2014/2015: BCR (2.81) was calculated using the crash history (40 crashes with 9 Casualty and 31 Property Damage) between 2008 and 2012 using the estimated construction cost of $330k; and
· Actual BCR: BCR (1.55) was calculated using the crash history (30 Crashes with 3 Casualty and 27 Property Damage) between 2010 and 2014 using the actual construction cost of $583k
It is noted that the Main Roads Crash database is updated yearly to add the latest year’s crash data while eliminating the oldest data to keep latest five years data. Crash data of 2015 will be available by the end of May 2016 which will give some insight regarding the effectiveness of the Traffic Signals in reducing crashes. However, it should be noted that one year post installation data is not sufficient to correctly analyse the impact of traffic signals installation. Additionally, Blackspot projects are targeted to eliminate an established pattern of crashes by implementing most appropriate and feasible mitigation treatment. While this is likely to address the most common pattern of crashes it is unlikely to eliminate all crashes. Given that the actual BCR is above 1.0, this project still provides overall benefit to the community and meets the Black Spot Program requirements.
Consultation
Consultations have occurred with the City of Swan staff involved with the development and delivery of this project.
Comment
The project expenditure analysis has indicated that the project cost escalations were as a direct result of unforeseen circumstances such as the need to relocate utility providers’ underground services and general cost increases since the development of the initial cost estimate.
The increased costs became known after the detailed design and due to dependency on external agencies, these costs were unavoidable. The City of Swan has confirmed that the Project Manager regularly monitored the project’s expenditure to ensure that the project did not incur any unnecessary variations/ expenses.
Even though the project cost escalated significantly, due to a high number of crashes at this location, the installation of traffic signals provided the best traffic treatment solution and the final BCR of 1.55 confirms that the completed project provides a value for money to the community.
Following discussions amongst the relevant officers from both Cities, the City of Swan made a request to Main Roads WA for the provision of additional funding which was not supported as no extra funding was available within program budget to allocate to this project.
Based on the final project expenditure of $583,000 and grant funding of $330,000, the municipal funding contribution for this project is $253,000 and each City’s share on equal basis is $126,500. However, the City of Swan has sought a total contribution of $110,000 from the City.
As the City made a commitment to fund the installation of traffic signals at Alexander Drive/Illawarra Crescent with the both Cities intention to jointly share the costs over and above the grant funding, it is recommended that the City makes the balance contribution of $55,000.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
$110,000 has been allocated in Project Number – PR-2474 Traffic Treatments - Alexander Dr & Illawarra Crescent (Installation of Traffic Signals) in the 2015/16 Capital Works Program. A payment of $55,000 has been made to the City of Swan and the remaining $55,000 is available in this project number for making further payment, subject to Council’s decision on the recommendations made in this report.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that Administration has reviewed the detail provided by the City of Swan in relation to the increase in the project Costs associated with the Installation of Traffic Signals at Alexander Drive/Illawarra Crescent; and
2. APPROVES the balance payment of $55,000 to the City of Swan as the City’s contribution towards the Installation of Traffic Signals at Alexander Drive/Illawarra Crescent.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 143
3.12 Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive Intersection, Carramar - Agreement In Principle For Installation Of Traffic Signals
File Ref: 19441 – 15/550746
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 7
Issue
To provide an update on Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) position on the proposed installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive, Carramar.
Background
A petition requesting the installation of traffic control signals at the Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive Intersection was considered by Council at its meeting dated 30 June 2009 (IN07-06/09 refers), and resulted in the following resolution:
“That Council:-
3. SUBMITS an application to Main Roads WA for the installation of traffic control signals at the Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive intersection should the City be unsuccessful with its application for funding from the Metropolitan Regional Road Program for the construction of the Joondalup Drive dual carriageway between St Stephens Crescent and Tumbleweed Drive;”
Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan.
In September 2010, a traffic analysis was undertaken by GHD Consulting Engineers with a view to determining the appropriate intersection treatment option at this intersection. Based on GHD’s recommendations, the City wrote to MRWA on 3 December 2010 with respect to the installation of traffic signals at Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive intersection. In response to the City’s request, MRWA issued an ‘Agreement in Principle’ (AIP) on 20 April 2011; this being subject to a range of standard conditions, including the traffic signals being fully funded by the City or through submission to the State or Australian Government Black Spot Program (Attachment 2 refers).
Detail
The intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive is operating as a standard T-intersection with a Seagull Island in the median of Joondalup Drive.
Joondalup Drive is a District Distributor road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy, constructed as a dual carriageway with two lanes in each direction and right and left turn lanes provided at the Cheriton Drive intersection. It has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h. The traffic data collected on 20 October 2015 shows that Joondalup Drive carries 29987 vehicles per day (vpd).
Cheriton Drive is a Local Distributor road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and also constructed as a dual carriageway with one lane in each direction plus a left turn lane on the Joondalup Drive approach. It operates under the default Built Up Area speed limit of 50 km/h. A roundabout at the intersection of Cheriton Drive & Innesvale Way provides access into the Carramar Village Shopping Centre on the northwest corner.
This roundabout is located approximately 63 m north of Joondalup Drive. The traffic data collected on 16 October 2014 shows that Cheriton Drive carries 8504 vpd.
The City has access to MRWA’s crash data for the intersection of Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive. The data is updated annually; the most recent update is for the period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. MRWA has five categories for severe crashes; fatal; hospital, medical, property damage only (PDO) major and PDO minor. For clarification, PDO crashes are those crashes where no medical treatment is required by individuals involved in the crash. These crashes do not specifically refer to damage to a property, but include damage caused to vehicles and infrastructure as a result of a crash. A summary of the current five year crash data, 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014, is detailed in the table below:
|
Fatal |
Hospital |
Medical |
PDO major |
PDO minor |
Total |
|
0 |
1 |
7 |
15 |
6 |
29 |
In 2014, the City made a submission for funding of traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive under the 2015/16 Black Spot Program with a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of 2.08. At the time, it was indicated by MRWA that the original AIP was no longer considered valid due to increased traffic volume and change of traffic flow. It was recommended that the options be reviewed with MRWA using the latest traffic and crash data.
Subsequently, a further traffic analysis was undertaken by i3 Consulting Engineers in 2015, on behalf of the City. The report indicates that the current give-way control will soon reach capacity due to excessive delays for right turning traffic from Cheriton Drive at afternoon peak hour.
Further to MRWA requirements, on 16 April 2015 the City submitted another application with the i3 traffic report requesting to consider the new submission, with “Agreement in Principle” sought for traffic signals at the Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive intersection.
MRWA’s response of 1st July 2015 did not support the City’s submission for the ‘Agreement in Principle’. Refer to Attachment 3. MRWA has assessed the City’s request using the criteria for traffic signal control set out in the latest MRWA Policy and Application Guidelines for Traffic Control Signals and states that:
“ traffic control signals shall be considered where an average of three or more casualty crashes per year have occurred over a recent five year period and where traffic signals would have been the most effective from of treatment to prevent these crashes from occurring. It was found that the intersection does not meet the warrant with regard to crash history as there have only been eight casualty crashes recorded at this intersection in the five year period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014…..”
MRWA also indicated that, from a network operations point of view, the installation of signals would lead to a reduction in design performance and would be difficult to justify. As a result MRWA suggested that Council should consider investigating alternative treatments at this location; specifically, MRWA suggested the installation of a roundabout with the following assumptions and details:
· 18m radius for central carriageway.
· 10.5m total carriageway width.
· B Double in LH lane through with car on inside lane through – Joondalup Drive.
· 19m Semi turning in and out of Cheriton Drive.
· Width between edge of roundabout and tertiary road on southern side (Palmerston Cres) = 4.6m to road reserve and 6.5 kerb to kerb.
· Tie in with the existing roundabout on Cheriton Drive would be tight with the new alignment tying in just before the roundabout <15m.
· Adjustment would need to be made for the left hand turn into service road prior to entry into the roundabout eastbound (Rawlinna Parkway).
· There would need to be provision for relocation of a bus stop which would be under the new alignment 17m past the entrance to Rawlinna Parkway.
Based on the above assumptions MRWA prepared a concept design and presented to the City. Refer to Attachment 4.
As part of this process, the City again wrote to MRWA on 11 September 2015, requesting MRWA reconsider its decision for the installation of traffic signals. The City highlighted the safety implications of a roundabout (Attachment 5 refers). MRWA’s response of 26 October 2015 did not support the City’s recommendation (Refer to Attachment 6) and states that:
“………..With what appears to be only minimal afternoon-peak period inefficiency, this alone is not justification to install traffic signals. Most importantly, Main Roads has an obligation to ensure the most effective operation of the road network is considered when reviewing applications for traffic signals. Joondalup Drive is classified as a Distributor A road and traffic signals will impede this movement of traffic. Therefore, while your request has been noted, we have reached the same conclusion as previously advised in that traffic signals are not supported at this location at this stage.”
Again, the Mayor wrote to the Minister for Transport on 11 December 2015 seeking support for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive. The Minister for Transport response dated 30 March 2016 reiterated previous position of MRWA in not supporting the installation of traffic signals at this location. (Refer to Attachment 7)
Consultation
No consultation has been undertaken in the preparation of this report.
Comment
While a reduced size roundabout can be accommodated as per MRWA’s concept design at this intersection, Administration is concerned about the following safety implications and major infrastructure works associated with it:
· A roundabout with an 18m radius for Central Island & 10.5m width circulating carriageway roundabout is the absolute minimum requirements (According to Austroads GUIDE TO ROAD DESIGN PART 4B: ROUBDABOUTS) for a dual lane roundabout in 70km/h speed arterial road. The desirable minimum central island radius of a two-lane roundabout is 20m. As per Austroads guidelines the desirable values should be used whenever possible as they generally produce lower overall crash rates than those produced by the absolute values. In this case land availability for 20m central radius island roundabout will be crucial;
· Design problems in tying in the new roundabout with the existing roundabout at Cheriton Drive and Innesvale Way, which is less than 15m to the north;
· A very high potential non-compliance and safety issue from Heavy Haulage Vehicles not staying in the left lane;
· As there has been no underground utility surveys, potential Utility Service issues; and
· Considering that traffic will travel lot closer to Palmerston Crescent, residents will experience increased noise which may result in community dissatisfaction.
A preliminary roundabout design was undertaken at this location both by the City and a representative from MRWA. It was found that reduced size roundabout would not allow a B double vehicle to pass through the roundabout without cutting through both traffic lanes. Given the high traffic volumes on Joondalup Drive, Administration considers this option poses an unreasonable safety risk to vehicles. The other option available would be to increase the size of the roundabout to safely accommodate heavy vehicles but this option would not be possible without acquiring some land. Land to the south is not available as an adjacent subdivision road is running parallel to Joondalup Drive at this location. To acquire land on only one side of the road reserve (north) would mean quite a portion of Joondalup Drive would have to be realigned to achieve deflection through the roundabout also the queuing length along Cheriton Drive up to Innesvale Way would be reduced. Therefore due to the cost of acquiring some land, realigning Joondalup Drive and the shortening of the queuing length in Cheriton Drive this option was considered non-feasible.
The City has taken a proactive approach by proposing the installation of traffic signals at this intersection, however MRWA decision is based on the current traffic conditions which do not meet the warrant for the installation of traffic signals.
Administration considers that the installation of traffic signals is the best option at this location. As MRWA has consistently declined the City’s request to provide an ‘Agreement in Principle’ to install traffic signals at this location the City has a very limited option to await further change in traffic conditions and reapply to MRWA.
In the meantime, Administration recommends monitoring the intersection for future reconsideration for the installation of traffic signals.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
$240,000 (PR-2927) was allocated in the City’s 2015/16 Capital Works Program for installing traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive. Since traffic signals are not approved by MRWA and no other future infrastructure works are proposed, those funds will remain unexpended. While the roundabout is not recommended as a viable option, if considered, it is estimated to cost in the order of $1,200,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that Main Roads WA (MRWA) does not support the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive, Carramar;
2. REQUESTS Administration to continue monitoring the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive for future reconsideration for traffic signals meeting the required Main Roads WA requirements; and
3. NOTES that the funds ($240,000) allocated under PR-2927 will remain unexpended and will form part of the surplus at the end of the financial year.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive Intersection, Carramar - Location Map |
15/552024 |
|
|
2. |
Main Rods WA approval of the Agreement in Principle |
11/45076 |
|
|
3. |
Main Roads WA first rejection of the application for the Agreement in Principle |
15/238183 |
|
|
4. |
Main Roads WA - Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive Roundabout concept design. |
16/148033 |
|
|
5. |
Response to MRWA rejection for AIP for Traffic Signals at the Intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive - PR 2927 |
15/467059 |
|
|
6. |
Main Rods WA second rejection of the application for the Agreement in principle |
15/528734 |
|
|
7. |
Installation Traffic Signals - Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive Carramar |
16/113457 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 160
File Ref: 8053 – 16/72809
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 9
Issue
To consider the results of a new community consultation exercise for the proposed implementation of the Stage 3 Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) for Kingsway between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard.
Background
Community consultation was undertaken in September 2014 with all residents of Kingsway for the section between Mirrabooka Avenue and Wanneroo Road for Stage 1, 2 & 3 of the Kingsway TMS. Stage 1 & 2 were supported by the community with minor changes, while Stage 3 was generally not supported and required major changes in order to address residents’ concerns.
Council at its meeting of 9 December 2014 considered a report (IN06-12/14 refers) investigating the results of the community consultation for the staged implementation of the Kingsway Traffic Management Scheme. In response, Council resolved in part as follows;
“That Council:-
6. NOTES that Administration will complete a review of the Stage 3 Kingsway Traffic Management Scheme for the section between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard for reconsideration by Council in 2015/16 and budget consideration in 2016/2017.”
7. LISTS for consideration an amount of $15,000 for the design and documentation of the Stage 3 Kingsway Traffic Management Scheme between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard for consideration in the 2015/16 Capital Works Program (Traffic Treatments).
8. LISTS for consideration an amount of $10,000 for the design and documentation for the upgrade of street lighting along Kingsway between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard for consideration in the 2015/16 Capital Works Program (Street lighting).
A Locality Plan of the subject site is shown as Attachment 1.
Detail
Kingsway is listed as a Local Distributor road in accordance with the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and has a posted speed limit of 60km/h. Traffic Count Data for Kingsway between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard has been collected with the results summarised as below:
|
Location |
Traffic Volume (Volume Per Day) |
Operating Speed |
|
West of Kilchurn Promenade |
5,227 |
61Km/h |
|
West of Sporting Drive (650M west of Hartman Dr) |
7,832 |
64km/h |
|
East of Wanneroo Road |
9,280 |
62km/h |
Main Roads WA reported crash data for the 5-year period extending from Jan 2010 to December 2014 has been collected for Kingsway, between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard, with the following results;
- Fatal Crashes: 0
- Hospital Crashes: 4
- Medical Crashes: 11
- *Property Damage Only (PDO) Major Crashes: 30
- **PDO Minor Crashes: 17
*PDO Major Crashes are crashes which incurred more than $3,000 worth of damage.
**PDO Minor Crashes are crashes which incurred less than $3,000 worth of damage.
Total No. of reported crashes = 62
With reference to the crash patterns report for this section (see Attachment 2) the following crash types were listed as being above the normal figures on this type of road;
- Rear end crashes (Significantly over-represented)
- Crashes on slopes (Significantly over-represented)
- Night Crashes – streetlights on (Over-represented)
The first round of consultation in September 2014 mainly highlighted the following concerns of the community:
- Driving at night: Driving at night is considered dangerous and there are no considerations for upgrading the street lighting;
- Pedestrian Connectivity: Concerns regarding the Kingsway/Hartman Drive roundabout and pedestrians crossing issues;
- Movement to and from Kingsway Sporting Complex Netball carpark needs addressing; and
- Existing bus stops create problems for through traffic, constant congestion issues, request to investigate possibility of constructing bus embayments.
Administration considered these comments together with other issues raised by residents and developed a revised Traffic Management Scheme for Kingsway Stage 3. The existing scenarios and the approach taken in developing the revised design for the Kingsway Stage 3 Traffic Management Scheme are detailed as follows;
Section A, Drawing 2950-1-1, Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue
Existing scenario:
Kingsway for this section exhibits a single carriageway with service road connections for residential properties on both sides of the road. The road pavement width is 7.4m and the primary road reserve width is 20m and extends to 26m where service roads are provided. Overhead power lines run along the south side of Kingsway for this section and exist on an alignment approximately 2-4.5m from the westbound traffic lane.
Traffic Management Scheme - Section design:
(Attachment 3 refers) Administration considered the installation of a 2.0m wide part flush part raised median along this section of Kingsway to provide better crossing opportunities for pedestrians and so that street trees could be installed in the median to close in the road environment; however, in order to do this significant road widening on the south side of the road would need to occur. As this road widening would subsequently result in the overhead power poles falling within the clear zone of the road it would subsequently require the undergrounding of the overhead power. A Caravan Park exists at the western end of this section near Wanneroo Road; however, as there were no major issues regarding access to and from the facility the proposed scheme does not propose changes to access for the facility.
A review of traffic count data for this section indicated that average weekday traffic volumes were in the vicinity of 9200 vehicles per day (vpd) and that the road was operating with an 85%ile speed (speed at or below which 85% of drivers are travelling) of 62km/h. With the above considered, Administration has determined that the installation of a narrow median may better restrict the road environment and assist with decreasing through vehicle speeds. These works could be completed within the exiting road pavement width and would not require any modifications to existing kerbs and/or the overhead power. Treating the road this way would ensure that the scheme would in some way resemble the overall boulevard scheme approach for Kingsway whilst also being cost effective. As part of this section, Administration also considered it prudent to address a non-compliance issue caused by motorists using a service road to bypass buses stopping on the carriageway adjacent to No. 17 Kingsway. Residents in the properties between 17 & 33 Kingsway reported cars speeding along the service road to avoiding waiting behind buses and creating a dangerous environment on the service road. Administration considered that the installation of a speed cushion on the service road would likely be the best way to address this issue and reduce the attractiveness of the route so as to discourage motorists from doing the manoeuvre in future. This issue is further discussed in detail later in the report (2nd paragraph of consultation section refers).
Section B, Drawing 2950-2-1, Sovrano Avenue to Hartman Drive
Existing Scenario:
Kingsway for this section exhibits a single carriageway with service road connections on the north side of the road only. Kingsway Sporting Complex abuts Kingsway for the full length on the south side and the Brightwater Care Group village makes up approximately 50% of the frontage along the north side. The road pavement width is 7.4m and the primary road reserve width is 20m and extends to 26m where service roads are provided. Overhead power lines run along the south side of Kingsway for this section and exist on an alignment approximately 2-4.5m from the westbound traffic lane.
Traffic Management Scheme - Section design:
(Attachment 4 refers) Comments made by Kingsway residents and by staff at the Kingsway Sporting Complex (KSC) made mention to the fact that Kingsway (road) was regularly congested on weekends due to the volume of traffic generated by sports activities occurring at KSC. In addition, reports of speeding and pedestrian safety were also raised which Administration considered needed to be addressed as primary areas of concern. In order to address the congestion issues, it was considered necessary to provide a means of moving traffic off the through traffic path which was waiting to turn right to access the KSC by providing turning lanes. There are two locations along Kingsway between Sovrano Avenue and Hartman Drive where traffic can turn right into the KSC, Sporting Drive and the KSC carpark.
In order to facilitate the turning lanes significant widening would be required to accommodate the space in the road at each location and on the approaches so that sufficient lane storage lengths were able to be provided. Also, as a result of widening, the overhead power on Kingsway would need to be undergrounded as the required clear zones would not be achievable. In addition, the existing footpath on the south side of Kingsway, located behind the kerb, would also need to be relocated further back to create a new alignment away from the westbound traffic lane. As such, the footpath would be relocated back to reside adjacent to the KSC property boundary. A part raised / part flush median has been proposed which is suitably wide enough to include street trees to assist in closing in the road environment to address issues of speeding. Additionally, High Pressure Sodium lights (yellow colour) would be used in this section due to the width of the road. If traditional Compact Fluorescent Lights (White colour CFL) need to be installed, it will increase the cost significantly as it would require a number of additional poles. Due to the amount of work required to provide the infrastructure works and associated services works, the cost of constructing this section is estimated to be substantial; this would be a major consideration when deciding whether to proceed with allocating funding for construction.
Section C, Drawing 2950-3-1, Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard
Existing Scenario:
Kingsway for this section exhibits a single carriageway with service road connections for residential properties on the entire length of the south side of the road. The frontage percentage breakdown for the north side through this section is as follows; Kingsway Christian College 28%, Ashdale Secondary College 37%, Darch Plaza 20% and residential development 15%. The road pavement width varies along the length between 7.4m and 9.5m and the primary road reserve width is 20m and extends to 26m where service roads are provided. Street lighting is provided on both sides of the road via steel poles serviced by underground power.
Traffic Management Scheme - Section design:
(Attachment 5 refers) Primary focus on developing the traffic management scheme through this section was given to improving the pedestrian connectivity in the vicinity of Kingsway Christian College, Ashdale Secondary College and Darch Plaza. Peak pick-up/drop-off times have a major influence on traffic congestion on the roads bordering the schools and it was considered necessary to ensure that the proposed boulevard provide appropriate gaps for turning vehicles and allow sufficient opportunities for pedestrians and students to cross Kingsway. In addition, the Public Transport Authority was contacted and asked to give comment regarding the number of buses which stop for extended periods of time on Kingsway. PTA advised that the stops located along Kingsway outside Kingsway Christian College stop for extended periods of time in the peak pick-up/drop-off periods. A review of these stops indicated that the east-bound stop was embayed and allowed buses to stop off thru traffic, whereas the west-bound stop required buses to stop on road and was creating a major safety issue due to motorists driving around the buses on the opposite side of the road. It is considered necessary that the west-bound stop be relocated into an embayed area immediately east of the current location. Modifications to kerbing, drainage, street lighting and footpaths would be required. The newly installed bus shelter at the existing stop (Bus stop No 21905, adjacent to 162 Kingsway) will need to be reviewed for installation at the proposed embayment and be relocated subject to available space as part of detailed design. This space may be catered for by use of part of the drainage sump site adjacent to the proposed embayment. All other stops along Kingsway were considered for relocation into embayments; however, due to limited available verge space embayment relocations were not practical. A part-raised/part-flush median would therefore be proposed to be installed along the length of the section and has been made wide enough to accommodate street trees. This would subsequently result in road widening for 50% of the length of the section. Due to the amount of work required to provide the infrastructure works and associated services, it is estimated that the cost of constructing this section would be substantial.
This would be a major consideration when deciding whether to proceed with allocating funding for construction. The proposed TMS for this section not only addresses issues of speeding and pedestrian connectivity but also provides better access to the schools and improves the congestion issues which occur in the afternoons near the schools on a regular basis.
In order to assist Administration with determining the need for installing Traffic Management along Kingsway between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard it has been assessed in accordance with the City’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy (LATMP). The Policy provides information and guidance to allow officers to determine whether roads require infrastructure changes or increased policing. Any road assessed under this scoring system must receive a score greater than 60 in order to qualify. As per the sections stated above, Kingsway was assessed and scored as follows;
- Section A: Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue Score: 98
- Section B: Sovrano Avenue to Hartman Drive Score: 129
- Section C: Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard Score: 102
Furthermore it is noted that street lighting along the whole length of Kingsway Stage 2 does not meet current Australian Standards and would need a full upgrade as part of the TMS implementation.
Consultation
A letter and survey questionnaire was distributed on 22 January 2016 to 121 owners and occupiers of properties abutting Kingsway, which would be affected by the Stage 3 TMS proposal (Attachment 6 refers). In addition, A1 copies of the Traffic Management Scheme concept plans were erected at the Wanneroo Civic Centre foyer and Kingsway Sporting Complex for viewing by the general public, and "Have your say" signs were placed along Kingsway to give the general public an opportunity to provide comment.
The Community Consultation exercise (3 weeks duration) was originally proposed to close on Monday 15 February 2016; however, due to the size of the scheme the community consultation closing date was extended to Monday 29 February 2016 (allowing 5 weeks in total). At the close of the survey period, 58 responses were received, 44 in favour, 12 opposed and 2 responses were undefined (79% in favour to 21% opposed). Comments made by residents who were not in support of the proposal have been tabulated together with Administrations comments (see Attachment 7).
In addition to the above, a letter and survey questionnaire was distributed on 14 March 2016 to 9 owners and occupiers of properties which gain access from the service road for properties No. 17 to 33 (Attachment 8 refers). This consultation exercise was completed to ascertain residents’ level of support for the installation of a speed cushion along the service road to address issues of speeding by traffic using the service road to bypass buses stopping along Kingsway when heading east. Consultation closed on 28 March 2016. At the close of the survey period, 6 responses were received, 5 in favour, 1 opposed (83% in favour to 17% opposed). The comment made by the resident who was not in support of the proposal together with Administrations comment is provided at Attachment 9.
Comment
The Implementation of the Stage 3 TMS along Kingsway, between Wanneroo Road and Ashdale Boulevard, received strong support from the community. This is a good indicator that residents are in support of the scheme and concerned about the existing traffic issues along Kingsway.
Cost estimates have been prepared for each Section of the Stage 3 Traffic Management Scheme (A, B & C) to assist Council with determining the viability of implementing the Traffic Management Schemes in the sections proposed or decide to further break the remaining section into smaller sections to make the implementation more viable. The estimated costs for each section are as follows:
|
Project - Kingsway TMS Stage 3 |
Streetlight Upgrade Works |
Infrastructure Works |
Total Cost |
Section Length |
Cost per 100m |
|
Section A - 2950-1-1 Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue |
$20,000 |
$145,000 |
$165,000 |
630m |
$26,984 |
|
Section B - 2950-2-1 Sovrano Avenue to Hartman Drive |
$520,000 |
$730,000 |
$1.25M |
800m |
$156,250 |
|
Section C - 2950-3-1 Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard |
$110,000 |
$490,000 |
$600,000 |
800m |
$75,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$650,000 |
$1,365,000 |
$2,015,000 |
2.23Km |
$87,826 |
Costs associated with the construction of Stage 1 & 2 of the Kingsway Traffic Management Scheme (constructed in 2014/15 and 2015/16) were as follows;
- Kingsway TMS Stage 1 (PR-2873) – Cost $390,000 – Length 440m
(cost per 100m = $88,636)
- Kingsway TMS Stage 2 (PR-2981) – Cost $350,000 – Length 405m
(cost per 100m = $86,419)
The proposed stage 3 TMS has a unit cost of $87,826 per 100m across the whole section which is comparable to the unit cost of 100m in the already constructed sections.
Administration also considered the options of funding the works by external funding such as Blackspot funding.
The primary Criteria for Blackspot submission is as follows;
|
Criteria |
Australian Government Black Spot State and Local Roads (Federal Funding) |
State Black Spot Local Roads (State Funding) |
|
|
Crash Criteria
Intersection or Mid-Block or Short Road Section (<3 kilometres) |
3 casualty crashes over a five-year period |
Metro 5 crashes over 5 years |
Rural 3 crashes over 5 years |
|
Funding Contribution |
Usually 100% |
2:1 |
2:1 |
A Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of greater than 1 is required in order for a project to be considered for State funding and greater than 2 is required for Federal funding. The BCR is a product of the crash cost savings in comparison to the project cost.
The full length of Kingsway Stage 3 TMS cannot be assessed for BCR due to different treatments being proposed in each section. Hence, the TMS is split into three sections as described previously and BCR calculations have been completed for each section as follows:
Section A Total Cost = $165,000
Crash Cost Savings = $448,423
BCR = 2.72 (Qualifies for State and Federal funding)
Section B Total Cost = $1.25M
Crash Cost Savings = $600,000
BCR = 0.48 (Does not qualify for funding)
Section C Total Cost = $600,000
Crash Cost Savings = $1.085m
BCR = 1.81 (Qualifies for State funding)
The Stage 3 TMS for Kingsway is 2.3km long and with consideration of the estimated cost of implementing the scheme being in the order of $2M; Administration recommends it to be broken down into smaller sections to enable phased funding by the City.
Considering the available external funding opportunity, Administration proposes to apply for Section A and Section C of the scheme for consideration as part of the next available Black Spot funding round for 2017/2018. Should the project receive funding under the Federal funding arrangement the cost will be 100% funded from the program. If the project receives funding as part of the State funding arrangement it will be funded on a 2:1 ratio, i.e. 2/3 of the cost covered by the program, and 1/3 of the cost to be covered by the City. However, if the projects are unsuccessful in securing Blackspot funding for 2017/18 Council can consider undertaking the works by Municipal funding.
The remaining section, Section B of the TMS is the most expensive ($1.25M) section and does not meet the requirements of Blackspot submission. A large part of it is due to the Streetlighting Upgrade. The section extends for 800m and borders residential properties on the north side and the Kingsway Sporting Complex on the south side. Comments made as part of the community consultation made mention that the majority of issues along this stretch were attributed to the congestion on the weekend as a result of motorists accessing the Kingsway Sporting Complex for recreation and sporting activities. The TMS is designed to improve this issue however to do this it requires significant infrastructure and streetlight upgrading at a substantial cost. Considering this section mainly addresses the concern of Kingsway Sporting complex which is experienced only two days of a week and it does not meet Blackspot submission requirements, Administration proposes to further review this section with a Traffic Study investigating different access options for KSC which will not require undertaking major infrastructure or Streetlighting upgrade.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City’s Traffic Local Area Traffic Management Policy is applicable to this report.
Financial Implications
In accordance with the previous decisions made by Council, a project for the construction of the Kingsway Stage 3 TMS was to be listed in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program (LTCWP) in 2016/2017 for an amount of $350,000. However, in view of the details identified in this report it is recommended to rather to allocate $50,000 in 2016/17 for;
- (a) A further review of Kingsway TMS Section B: Sovrano Avenue and Hartman Drive with a Traffic Study investigating different access options for Kingsway Sporting Complex which does not require undertaking major infrastructure or streetlight upgrades.
- (b) Undertake detailed design of Kingsway TMS Section A: Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue; and
- (c) Undertake detailed design of Kingsway TMS Section C: Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard.
Section A and Section C are recommended to be listed from 2017/18 in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program with allocation of $165,000 and $600,000. If the projects are successful in receiving funding as part of the Black Spot Program, the budget will need to be updated to reflect the funding arrangement accordingly.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the proposal to split Kingsway Stage 3 TMS into three sections due to significant infrastructure upgrades required to implement the revised Kingsway Stage 3 TMS noting that the sections are to be split as follows;
- Section A: Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue;
- Section B: Sovrano Avenue to Hartman Drive; and
- Section C: Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard.
2. ENDORSES for implementation Section A and Section C of the revised Kingsway Stage 3 TMS as detailed in City Drawing No.’s 2950-1-1 (Attachment 3 refers) & 2950-3-1 (Attachment 5 refers);
3. REQUESTS Administration to seek Blackspot funding for Section A and Section C of the revised Kingsway Stage 3 TMS as part of the 2017/2018 Blackspot submission round;
4. REQUESTS Administration to undertake community consultation with directly affected properties and report back to Council in 2016/17 on the outcome of the review of Section B Sovrano Avenue and Hartman Drive with a Traffic Study investigating different access options for Kingsway Sporting Complex which may not require undertaking major infrastructure or streetlight upgrades;
5. NOTES that an amount of $50,000 has been listed in the City’s 2016/17 Capital Works Program for;
- A further review of Kingsway TMS Section B: Sovrano Avenue and Hartman Drive with a Traffic Study investigating different access options for Kingsway Sporting Complex which does not require undertaking major infrastructure or streetlight upgrades;
- Undertake detailed design of Kingsway TMS Section A: Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue; and
- Undertake detailed design of Kingsway TMS Section C: Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard.
6. LISTS an amount of $165,000 in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program from 2017/2018 for constructing Section A of the Kingsway Stage 3 Traffic Management Scheme proposal (Wanneroo Road to Sovrano Avenue) as shown in City Drawing No. 2950-1-1 (Attachment 3 refers) noting that the budget may require adjustment to reflect the outcome of Blackspot Submission 2017/18;
7. LISTS an amount of $600,000 in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program from 2017/2018 for constructing Section C of the Kingsway Stage 3 Traffic Management Scheme proposal (Hartman Drive to Ashdale Boulevard) as shown in City Drawing No. 2950-3-1 (Attachment 5 refers) noting that the budget may require adjustment to reflect the outcome of Blackspot Submission 2017/18; and
8. ADVISES the respondents of community consultation along Kingsway of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Kingsway TMS - Locality Plan - Stg3 - CC results |
16/114195 |
|
|
2. |
Kingsway_0.06_to_2.32SLK_CrashPatternsReport_April2016 |
16/114236 |
|
|
3. |
2950-1-1 Kingsway Stg 3 TMS Concept Plan Section A |
16/114622 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
2950-2-1 Kingsway Stg 3 TMS Concept Plan Section B |
16/114628 |
|
|
5. |
2950-3-1 Kingsway Stg 3 TMS Concept Plan Section C |
16/114631 |
Minuted |
|
6. |
Kingsway, Landsdale - Stage 3 proposed traffic treatments - Community Consultation letter to residents |
16/114684 |
|
|
7. |
Kingsway Stg 3 - Community Consultation Residents Comments and Administrations Responses |
16/123708 |
|
|
8. |
Kingsway (Service Road) - Community Consultation - letter to residents |
16/123740 |
|
|
9. |
Kingsway (Service Road) - Community Consultation Residents Comments and Administrations Responses |
16/125149 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 181
Infrastructure Capital Works
File Ref: 19413 – 16/85556
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider an amendment to the approved 2015/2016 Capital Works Budget Street Lighting Program and associated budget variation.
Background
The City's 2014/2015 Capital Works Program included provision for upgrading of Caporn Street, Mariginiup, Street Lighting consisting of Western Power fee of $62,920 for the supply and installation of 35 x 250W HPS luminaires on existing poles.
The design was completed and settlement of the associated $1,500 invoice occurred in 2014/2015. A substantial portion of the work was also completed in the 2014/2015 financial year. However Western Power had concerns over the condition of several poles which they replaced at their cost prior to the new luminaires being installed. Then further delay ensued due to Western Power concerns over safety and the location of one pole which was not addressed until shortly before Western Power submitted its final account on 5 February 2016 with a request for settlement of the account by 6 March 2016.
Although it was intended that the committed budget was carried forward into the 2015/2016 financial year, it was not included in the 2015/2016 approved budget.
This report considers the transfer of $62,920 project savings from one project to fund the shortfall for the completion of street lighting works undertaken on Caporn Street, Mariginiup.
Detail
Western Power has extended the $62,920 account settlement deadline to accommodate Council’s consideration of this request for funding reallocation to pay for the delayed works and associated invoice.
The savings achieved on the Wesco Road Stage 4 upgrade and widening project are available for transfer to address the Caporn Street, Mariginiup, Street Lighting project funding shortfall. That project was completed with savings principally because the construction crew worked on weekends to accelerate the reconstruction period thereby facilitating works completion within the approved road closure period minimising what would otherwise have been significant traffic management and on-costs. The actual final costs for Western Power and Telstra adjustment works were also considerably less than the estimated costs.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken in the preparation of this report.
Comment
The additional funding required to settle the outstanding Western Power account is recommended to be sourced from the $158,987 savings from the completed Wesco Road Stage 4 Upgrade and Widening project.
Statutory Compliance
Budget variation is in compliance with Part 6 – Financial Management of Local Government Act and Part 2 – General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City’s Accounting Policy Section 3(g)(c) states:
“Circumstances:
…the budget allocation for a capital work project is insufficient.
Action:
In accordance with Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 by way of a report and recommendation to the Council seeking authorisation of the expenditures and to endorse the necessary budget variation.”
Financial Implications
The funding to settle the outstanding street lighting account for completed work in Caporn Street, Mariginiup, can be accommodated by reallocating funds from available savings from the completed Wesco Road Stage 4 Upgrade and Widening project as summarised below.
|
Project |
Description |
From (Municipal Funding Available Though Project Savings) |
To (Municipal Funding Required) |
|
PR-4012 |
Wesco Road, Nowergup – Stage 4 Upgrade & Widening |
$158,987 |
|
|
PR-2861 |
Caporn Road Street Lighting Mariginiup |
|
$62,920 |
|
Total |
$158,987 |
$62,920 |
|
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure listed in the following table, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for the Upgrading of Street Lighting in Caporn Street, Mariginup, as follows:
EXPENDITURE
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Adjusted Budget |
|
Upgrading of Street Lighting in Caporn Street, Mariginiup |
PR-2861 |
$0 |
$62,920 |
2. APPROVES the following budget amendment to fund the project funding shortfall for the recently completed street lighting in Caporn Street, Mariginiup;
|
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
|
PR-4012 |
$62,920 |
|
Wesco Road, Nowergup – Stage 4 Upgrade & Widening |
|
PR-2861 |
|
$62,920 |
Caporn Street Street Lighting, Mariginiup |
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 184
File Ref: 3125V02 – 16/80112
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the results of a traffic study to improve safety at the Intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue, Marangaroo. Attachment 1 shows a locality plan of the area.
Background
Council at its meeting of 03 March 2015 considered a report in relation to a project for the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive (South), Marangaroo (refer IN05-03/15) and resolved in part as follows:
“That Council:-
3. LISTS for consideration in the 2015/2016 Capital Works Program, $50,000 to
undertake a study to analyse traffic issues at the intersection of Hepburn
Avenue and Highclere Boulevard Marangaroo, and make recommendation to
improve traffic safety at this intersection;”
Subsequent funding was adopted in 2915/16 Capital Works Program to undertake this study and the City appointed Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd to provide a Traffic Analysis and Feasibility Study of Safety Improvements for the intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue. Cardno’s final report for this study was received by the City on the 17 December 2015. A copy of this report has been tabled in the Elected Members Reading Room for reference and also made available on the Hub.
Detail
The intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue is an un-signalised ‘Tee’ intersection with Highclere Boulevard terminating at this intersection. This intersection consists of right and left turning slip lanes from Hepburn Avenue to Highclere Boulevard and a left turn slip lane from Highclere Boulevard into Hepburn Avenue. There is a seagull island within the median on Hepburn Avenue to assist the right-through-turn manoeuvre.
Highclere Boulevard is classified as a Local Distributer in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy; it operates under the Default Built Up Area speed limit of 50km/h and traffic counts taken in September 2015 indicate it carries over 7800 vehicles per day (vpd) near the intersection of Hepburn Avenue. Hepburn Avenue is classified as a District Distributer ‘A’ in the City’s functional Road Hierarchy with a posted speed limit of 70km/h and traffic counts conducted in November 2013 indicate a traffic volume over 23000 vpd, approaching the intersection with Highclere Boulevard.
This intersection underwent extensive modification in June 2012 when Hepburn Avenue was modified to four lane dual carriageway. Main Roads WA reported crashes for this intersection during the period from June 2012 to December 2014 are summarised below;
· Fatal Crashes: 0
· Hospital Crashes: 0
· Medical Crashes: 4
· *PDO Major Crashes: 9
· **PDO Minor Crashes: 3
*PDO Major Crashes are crashes which incurred more than $3,000 worth of damage.
**PDO Minor Crashes are crashes which incurred less than $3,000 worth of damage.
The Main Roads WA Crash Statistics for crash patterns at this intersection report the following crash types as being above the normal figures expected on this type of intersection;
· Rear end crashes (Significantly Over-represented)
· Right Turn Through Crashes (Significantly Over-represented)
· Dawn Or Dusk Crashes (Over – represented)
The report from Cardo highlighted poor sight lines to oncoming traffic while attempting to join the east bound traffic in Hepburn Avenue while performing a right through turn from Highclere Boulevard. In this case the sightline to oncoming traffic is obscured by queuing traffic in the right turn slip lane located in the Hepburn Avenue median. This is considered to be the major contributor to Right-Through-Turn Crashes. In addition to this drivers performing this manoeuvre may hesitate causing Rear-End crashes along the traffic queue.
In developing an effective treatment for the intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue, Cardno considered the following aspects:-
· Road Function and configuration;
· Crash Statistics;
· Outcomes of Cardno’s Traffic Analysis and Feasibility Study;
· Cost effectiveness of proposed treatment;
· Effect on Public Transport and Pedestrian Facilities (bus routes and road crossings); and
· Effect of intersection modification on existing traffic movement and behaviour.
The Traffic Analysis and Feasibility Study prepared by the consultant Cardno Pty Ltd identified five possible treatments for this intersection, as listed below in order of preference:-
1. Ban the right turn out of Highclere Boulevard onto Hepburn Avenue – traffic wishing to turn right can go left onto Hepburn Avenue then perform a U-turn at Hartman Drive roundabout;
2. Install traffic signals at Hepburn Avenue/Evandale Drive to create additional gaps in the traffic flow (this will also benefit traffic turning in and out of Evandale Road);
3. Install a roundabout at the Hepburn Avenue/Highclere Boulevard intersection – note that a smaller design will be required due to road reserve constraints;
4. Ban right-turn out and right- turn in, replace with two U-turn bays spaced approximately 120m east and west of the intersection;
5. Install traffic signals at Hepburn Avenue / Highclere Boulevard to provide fully controlled movements.
The two traffic signal treatments were not considered further due to those not meeting Main Roads WA requirements. The treatment banning all right turns and installing U-turn bays was also not considered suitable rejected as this treatment would require drivers to change lanes over a short distance on Hepburn Avenue and would be a difficult manoeuvre in peak traffic periods.
Following Cardno’s report, Administration developed three options for further consideration:-
|
Option |
Description |
Implications |
|
Option ‘A’ |
Close Right Turn out of Highclere Boulevard in to Hepburn Avenue, as shown in the City’s drawing no. 3252-02-0 (refer Attachment 2). Estimated cost $80,000. This option will stop all right turns from Highclere Boulevard into Hepburn Avenue and force all traffic from Highclere Avenue to turn left. |
This option will substantially reduce the over-represented crashes, but will reduce the functionality of the intersection by removing the right-through-turn form Highclere Boulevard to Hepburn Avenue. Drivers wanting to turn right from Highclere Boulevard would be required to turn left and use the roundabout 370m to the west on Hepburn Avenue to perform a U-turn. Similarly traffic will have to use an alternate option to turn right before Hepburn Avenue and use Berkley Road to access Mirrabooka Avenue. |
|
Option ‘B’ |
Offset the Right Turn Slip Lane into Highclere Boulevard from Hepburn Avenue, as shown in the City’s drawing no. 3252-3-0 (refer Attachment 3). Estimated cost $190,000. This Option proposes to relocate the right turn slip lane in the Hepburn Avenue median. It will be relocated an estimated 2.0 metres south toward the median’s centre to give the right turning traffic from Highclere Boulevard a clearer sightline when joining the east bound traffic on Hepburn Avenue. |
This will provide better sight lines for drivers turning right into Hepburn Avenue and will keep the full functionality of the intersection. However this option will not address all aspects of the safety concerns resulting in a partial reduction of over- represented crashes. This will reduce Right-Through-Turn crashes and Reduce-Clear end crashes by reducing driver’s hesitation.
|
|
Option ‘C’ |
Construct roundabout at the intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue, as shown in the City’s drawing no. 3252-1-0 (refer Attachment 4). Estimated cost $1,200,000. |
This option will provide significant reduction on all over represented crash types without reducing the intersections functionality but at a substantial cost. Given the high traffic volume and a 70km/h posted speed limit on Hepburn Avenue this intersection will require a large dual roundabout. There is insufficient road reserve width at this intersection to provide for the ideal size roundabout and therefore the optimum manoeuvring paths for larger vehicles will be compromised. There are existing bus routes using this intersection and Hepburn Avenue is classified as a Heavy Vehicle Route, installing a suitable roundabout that would cater for these vehicles would be challenging.
|
Consultation
Community Consultation has not been considered for this project since there are no residences that are directly affected by the proposed treatment identified as a safety requirement for the intersection of distributor roads.
Comment
During peak traffic flows this intersection offers little opportunity for vehicles turning right from Highclere Boulevard and this is resulting in drivers taking risks when turning right into Hepburn Avenue. With the added difficulty of poor sightlines to oncoming traffic once these drivers are queued in the median, it can be concluded that significantly over-represented right–through-turn crashes are caused by this manoeuvre. This manoeuvre may also cause drivers to hesitate when moving off, causing rear end crashes further down the traffic queue.
There are two main issues identified with the traffic flows at this intersection being the driver behaviour and sightlines issues in Hepburn Avenue.
Administration considers that Option A will address both issues but may not be acceptable to the community. The drivers have an option to use alternative roads in the vicinity and avoid right turn movement out of Highclere Boulevard. Therefore, Administration’s view is to allow full turn movements at this intersection and improve sightlines in Hepburn Avenue. Option B provides for that and is the favoured solution in this instance.
Consideration has been given to submitting this project for blackspot funding however this is unlikely to be considered as five years of crash data is required for funding submissions. Since the reconstruction of this intersection was completed in June 2012 it may be three to four years before the City has the required statistics to supports a Black Spot Submission.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.3 Easy to Get Around - The community is well connected and accessible with an integrated transport approach for all.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Subject to the detailed design and outcome of investigation of the various services, the estimated costs for the design and construction of the three options are summarised below:
· Option A - $80,000
· Option B - $190,000 and
· Option C - $1,200,000.
It is noted that no funding is currently allocated for works associated with these options in the approved Capital Works Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the proposed Intersection Modifications - Option B, for the intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue, Marangaroo as shown in City Drawing No.’s 3252-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers); and
2. LISTS $190,000 funding for consideration in the Long Term Capital Works Budget for the construction of the Intersection Modification for the intersection of Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue, Marangaroo.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue Marangaroo - Intersection Treatment - Locality Plan. |
16/142948 |
|
|
2. |
Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue Marangaroo - Intersection Treatment - Option A. |
16/142973 |
|
|
3. |
Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue Marangaroo - Intersection Treatment - Option B. |
16/142975 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Highclere Boulevard and Hepburn Avenue Marangaroo - Intersection Treatment - Option C. |
16/142969 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 193
File Ref: 22777 – 16/134180
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01625 – Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation upgrade.
Background
The existing irrigation system at Marangaroo Golf Course has reached the end of its design life and historical maintenance information indicates that it needs to be replaced.
The upgrade of the irrigation system is designed to meet industry best practice in the minimisation of water use through hydrozoning and use of contemporary irrigation technologies. The irrigation system will be a centrally controlled, pressurised system capable of delivering a full night irrigation cycle of 10mm between the hours of 8.00pm and 5.30am with the following features and capability parameters.
• ET controlled via a weather station
• Provision for a coefficient of uniformity of 90-95%
• Sprinklers, Valves, valve boxes and quick coupler valves
• Pump management software
• Technical support on-line and on-ground for a period of 3 years
• Remote access and control of the system via mobile devices
• Two wire decoder system
• New mainlines, laterals, wiring, satellites and required pump interfacing
• Ability to inject liquid fertiliser/wetting agents through the system
• Onscreen course map/interactive digital software with active aerial image mapping
• Central system capable of creating course condition reports
Detail
Tender No 01625 for the Design and Construction of the Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade was advertised on 12 March 2016 and closed on 19 April 2016. A copy of the tender document has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Essential details of the contract are as follows:
|
Contract Term |
Detail |
|
Contract Type |
Lump Sum |
|
Commencement Date |
June 2016 |
|
Works Completion date |
End September 2016 |
|
Rise and Fall Included |
No |
A mandatory site inspection was held on 21st March 2016 with key stakeholders in attendance (Golf Pro-shop and Arboriculturalist). Representatives from 5 potential Tenderers attended the site inspection with key issues raised and discussed.
Tender submissions were received from the following companies:
· Total Eden Pty Ltd
· LD Total
The tender submissions were deemed to be compliant.
The Tender Evaluation Panel (TEP), comprising a Project Manager, Irrigation Technical Officer, Principal Technical Advisor and a Contracts Officer, evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria and weightings:
|
Description |
Score |
|
Price for goods and services offered |
35% |
|
Tenderer’s demonstrated experience in delivering works of a similar nature on golf courses |
15% |
|
Tenderer’s safety management |
20% |
|
Tenderer’s proposed methodology to deliver the works |
20% |
|
Tenderer's demonstrated ability to complete the works within specified timeframes |
10% |
Price for Goods and Services Offered (50%)
Tenderers provided lump sum prices for the scope of works. An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the lump sum price provided with the tender documentation. Tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
LD Total |
1 |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
2 |
An alternative option to consider the mainline in poly rather than PVC was requested but only LD Total submitted a price. This option is generally a more expensive initial capital outlay but has increased reliability and reduced maintenance liability. LD Total price for the poly option is lower than Total Eden’s submission for the PVC equivalent and is therefore considered value for money and the preferred option.
Tenderer’s demonstrated experience in delivering works of a similar nature on golf courses (15%)
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderer’s experience and capability in supplying services of a similar nature and circumstances on golf courses.
Total Eden has extensive experience in undertaking designs and construction works on golf courses in Australia and presented a list with examples of completed projects. Total Eden’s response demonstrates excellent capability and experience relevant to the requirements of the project and evaluation criterion.
LD Total as a company does not have relevant experience delivering this type of work on golf courses but it provided a detailed list of key personnel and their relevant experience on delivering work of this type on golf courses. LD Total’s response demonstrates very good capability and capacity for the construction works on the basis that staff listed are available to undertake this work. Based upon the information provided, tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
LD Total |
2 |
Tenderer’s Safety Management (20%)
The assessment was based on the tenderers submitted Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) documentation, quality control system and responses to the tenderer’s OHS Management System Questionnaire.
Total Eden provided a comprehensive document which covered everything from ISO certification, to training matrix and an in depth HSEQ Management Plan. Total Eden’s response demonstrates very good capability and experience relevant to the requirements of the project and evaluation criteria.
LD Total’s submission also included full HSEQ documentation including worked examples. LD Total did not submit an ISO accreditation but do have AS4801 Certificate of Confidence. LD’s submission also demonstrated very good capability and experience relevant to the requirements of the project and evaluation criteria. Based upon the information provided, tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
LD Total |
2 |
Tenderer’s proposed methodology to deliver the works (20%)
Assessment of this criterion considered the preliminary design submitted as part of the tender evaluation and the tenderers proposed methodology to deliver the services.
LD Total provided a full list of personnel, most of whom have extensive experience and knowledge in delivering design and construction of irrigation works on golf courses. It also provided a detailed methodology including key indicators that showed a good understanding of the operational constraints for the work. The preliminary design submitted with the tender considered most of the design requirements. The response demonstrates excellent capability, capacity and experience relevant to the evaluation criterion.
Total Eden provided a basic methodology with its submission. The preliminary design submitted with the tender does not meet the requirement to minimise the impact to the golf course users, keeps the existing system hydraulically operational for the duration of the works and is not futureproof. The tender submission is credible but not completely convincing with some gaps. Based upon the information provided, tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
LD Total |
1 |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
2 |
Tenderer’s demonstrated ability to complete the works within the specified timeframe (10%)
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderer’s capacity in terms of labour and plant resources with due consideration given to the tenderer’s ongoing commitments.
LD Total provided a breakdown of the company structure stating that additional resources can be mobilised for this work. It also stated that its current capacity is 65% and this work would take the capacity of the company to 80% giving the City confidence that there is a low risk associated with regards to the available resources. The schedule provided showed the duration of works for each fairway and included a completed date for the end of August 2016. The response demonstrates excellent capability, capacity and experience relevant to the evaluation criterion.
Total Eden gave a list of projects and confirmed that this work would have no impact. It does not have a reliance on sub-contractors.
It did not submit a schedule but provided a list of the days the fairways would not be accessible with the indication that the constraints for holes 1 and 9 would not be achieved. The response complies and is credible but not completely convincing. Based upon the information provided, tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
LD Total |
1 |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
2 |
Overall Weighted Score
The tenderer’s submissions were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process with the following observations being of significance:-
– the key aspect of the tender evaluation is price
– the tender submissions were evaluated in accordance with the selection criteria and assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience, ability and safety management systems to undertake the tender.
The overall weighted score has resulted in the following tender ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
LD Total |
1 |
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
2 |
Consultation
The Pro shop and Golf Course Maintenance Contractor have been consulted with regards the extent and planning of the works.
Further detailed consultation will be undertaken with the affected parties including Golf Club operators.
Notifications will be sent to the neighbouring residents advising that construction works is due to commence 2 weeks before the commencement of the works.
Comment
The tender submission from LD Total achieved the highest score in accordance with the assessment criteria. LD Total has provided evidence as to its approach, experience, resources and safety systems to be able to carry out the services in accordance with the contract requirements and is therefore recommended as the preferred tenderer.
Reference checks have indicated that this contractor has previously provided a satisfactory service delivery to its customers.
The proposed implementation program, subject to resolving to award tender, has been scheduled as follows:
|
Contract Award |
26 May 2016 |
|
Construction |
June 2016 – August 2016 |
|
Practical Completion |
September 2016 |
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
It is noted that a development approval is not required for this project.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.2 Conserve Water - We will have a community that encourages water conservation resulting in access to the right amount of water to meet our requirements”
Risk Management Considerations
Corporate Score Card Pty Ltd undertook both financial and performance assessment of Sanpoint Pty Ltd t/a LD Total. The assessment indicated that it has a sound financial capacity to undertake the contract in question.
As a matter of course, bank guarantee or retention, will be provided by the appointed contractor prior to commencement of the works.
There are no other existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of the City's Purchasing Policy, including environmental considerations such as reuse of materials where appropriate.
Financial Implications
The project costs, based on the recommended tenderer’s price is summarised below:
|
Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade (PR-3053) |
||
|
|
Estimated Expenditure |
Budget |
|
Capital Works Program 2015/2016 |
|
$632,500.00 |
|
Total Budget |
|
$632,500.00 |
|
Total expenditure to date |
$5,233 |
|
|
Commitments (2015/2016) |
$505 |
|
|
Construction costs – Tender No 01625 |
$922,200.80 |
|
|
Construction contingency including other works in conjunction with the contract works (15%) |
$138,330 |
|
|
Construction (3%) and Project Management (3%) Costs |
$55,332 |
|
|
Total Expenditure (Estimate) |
$1,121,600.80 |
|
|
Balance: |
-$489,100.80 |
|
|
Funding required in 2016/2017 |
|
$489,101 |
|
|
|
≈ $500,000 |
$500,000 has been listed in draft 2016/17 Capital Works Budget, noting that this project was scheduled to be undertaken over the financial year.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Sanpoint Pty Ltd t/as LD Total for Tender No 01625 for the Design and Construction of the Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade for its tendered fixed lump sum price of $922,200.80 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document; and
2. NOTES that $500,000 has been listed in draft 2016/2017 Capital Works Budget to fully complete the works for the Design and Construction of the Marangaroo Golf Course Irrigation Upgrade.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 199
3.17 Tender No 01623 Fabrication and Installation of Garrison style perimeter fencing to part of Marangaroo Golf Course
File Ref: 21724 – 16/154285
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01623 for the fabrication and installation of Garrison Style perimeter fencing to part of Marangaroo Golf Course.
Background
The Marangaroo Golf Course is vested as Crown Land which the City operates as a public golf course. This tender is the second stage of the 'chain mesh' perimeter fence replacement with 'garrison style' fencing at Marangaroo Golf Course.
Detail
Tender No. 01623 was advertised on Saturday 5 March 2016 and closed on Tuesday 22 March 2016. A copy of the Tender document is available in the Elected Member Reading Room.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type |
Lump sum |
|
Contract Duration |
17 weeks |
|
Commencement Date |
July 2016 |
|
Completion |
October 2016 |
Tenders received.
Tenders were received from the following companies:
· Marebar Pty Ltd T/A D.B.S. Fencing (“DBS”);
· The Fencewright Unit Trust T/A Fencewright (“Fencewright”);
· Southern Wire Pty Ltd (“Southern Wire”);
· Nikal Pty Ltd T/A Reliable Fencing (“Reliable Fencing”);
· Local Fencing Pro;
· The Trustee for the Simmonds Steel Trust (Simmonds Steel”);
· Richlands Pty Ltd ATF the AG MacDonald Family Trust T/A CAI Fences (“CAI Fences”); and
· Secure a Fence.
All tenders are compliant with the General Conditions of Tendering and have been evaluated in accordance with the City’s Tender evaluation process.
The Tender Evaluation Panel (TEP), consisting of City’s Project Officers (Parks and Conservation), Project Manager Infrastructure Capital Works with oversight and guidance from Contracts and Purchasing, Contracts Officer, to evaluate the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria:
|
Item No |
Description |
Weighting |
|
1 |
Price for the services offered |
40% |
|
2 |
Demonstrated ability on similar works |
20% |
|
3 |
Safety management and methodology |
30% |
|
4 |
Demonstrated ability to meet timeframes |
10% |
On initial review of the tender submissions by the TEP, it was confirmed that all tender submissions were deemed to be conforming tenders. Furthermore, an alternative tender was also submitted by Fencewright.
Price of services offered (40%)
Eight conforming tenders were received in accordance with the tendering requirements, each company submitted two options associated with fencing materials as alternative tenders and based on the prices offered, tenders are ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer – Option 1 Fencing materials for construction using Australian steel to comply with current Australian Standards |
Rank |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
1 |
|
Southern Wire |
2 |
|
Fencewright |
3 |
|
DBS Fencing |
4 |
|
Secure a Fence |
5 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
6 |
|
CAI Fencing |
7 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
8 |
|
Tenderer – Option 2 Fencing materials for construction to comply with current Australian Standards |
Rank |
|
DBS Fencing |
1 |
|
CAI Fencing |
2 |
|
Southern Wire |
3 |
|
Fencewright |
4 |
|
Secure a Fence |
5 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
6 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
7 |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
8 |
Demonstrated ability on similar works (20%)
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers experience in undertaking works of a similar nature and circumstances.
Southern Wire’s submission demonstrated a wide range of experience for industrial and rural fencing type of work. The submission provided a level of detail and clarity that reinforced the TEP’s confidence in their ability to complete the works to the required standard.
Fencewright’s submission also provided a wide range of experience for industrial and rural fencing type of work. However, the overall submission lacked detail and ranked accordingly.
Reliable Fencing’s submission was convincing and credible demonstrating a range of experience in similar works supported by relevant examples and timeframe methodology.
DBS Fencing, Secure a Fence and CAI Fencing provided a satisfactory submission supported by relevant works examples of similar scope and scale to what was tendered, however the documentation was not as detailed and ranked accordingly.
Simmonds Steel submission was sound, demonstrated by similar scaled working examples and supporting references, however provided basic information in support of this criterion.
Local Fencing Pro was not completely convincing and presented an average level of detail specific to references and construction experience.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Southern Wire |
1 |
|
Fencewright |
2 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
3 |
|
DBS Fencing |
4 |
|
Secure a Fence |
4 |
|
CAI Fencing |
4 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
5 |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
6 |
Safety management and methodology (30%)
The assessment for safety management was based on the tenderers submitted Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) policy documentation, working documentation, and responses to the Tender’s OHS management system questionnaire. Evidence of safety management systems, policies and practices was assessed based on the tenderers' responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire and the supporting documentation provided. All tenderers' provided details of varying standards.
Southern Wire and Fencewright demonstrated that they have a thorough understanding of the City’s requirements providing a comprehensive submission clearly detailing specific policies, procedural documentation and demonstrated the use of working documentation including comprehensive risk assessments, hazard reports, induction check lists, training records and toolbox records resources.
Reliable Fencing submission was credible and satisfactorily answered the Questionnaire and provided copies of policies, procedural documentation related to safety and demonstrated a sound level of understanding.
Secure a Fence provided a satisfactory submission supported by relevant works examples of similar scope and scale to what was tendered, however the documentation was not as detailed and ranked accordingly.
CAI provided sound submissions detailing safety related data, working documentation inclusive of risk assessments, reports, and meeting records.
Simmonds Steel and DBS’s submissions were sound, however contained an average level of detail and supporting evidence.
Local Fencing Pro’s submission was credible however not entirely convincing. The submission lacked detail and presented limited supporting evidence.
Based on the information provided, tenders have been ranked as below under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Southern Wire |
1 |
|
Fencewright |
1 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
2 |
|
Secure a Fence |
3 |
|
CAI Fencing |
3 |
|
DBS Fencing |
4 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
4 |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
5 |
Demonstrated ability to meet timeframes (10%)
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ resources listed for use in carrying out the services under this contract, and the tenderers’ proposed methodology to utilise the resources to deliver the services.
Southern Wire and Fencewright identified strong capability of carrying out the prescribed works within the required timeframe with a comprehensive methodology for the construction works, supported by extensive organisational experience in fencing construction hence they were ranked higher.
Reliable Fencing and DBS identified adequate capacity and access to resources to complete the scope of work. However, was not as convincing as the higher ranked tenders.
Simmonds Steel submission was sound, however contained an average level of detail and supporting evidence.
Secure a Fence and CAI Fencing provided sound submissions detailing safety related data, working documentation inclusive of risk assessments, reports, and meeting records.
Local Fencing Pro submission lacked the level of detail and clarity to be convincing.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Southern Wire |
1 |
|
Fencewright |
1 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
2 |
|
DBS Fencing |
2 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
3 |
|
Secure a Fence |
4 |
|
CAI Fencing |
4 |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
5 |
Overall Weighted Score
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Southern Wire |
1 |
|
Fencewright |
2 |
|
DBS Fencing |
3 |
|
Reliable Fencing |
4 |
|
CAI Fencing |
5 |
|
Secure a Fence |
6 |
|
Simmonds Steel |
7 |
|
Local Fencing Pro |
8 |
Southern Wire was assessed as having achieved the highest overall ranking from the tender assessment and is therefore recommended by the Tender Evaluation Panel as the preferred tenderer.
The key characteristics of Southern Wire’s tender submission are:
· Competitive tender price;
· Comprehensive experience with similar scale projects;
· Qualified key personnel to enable the services to be rendered successfully; and
· Satisfactory reference checks.
Works Program
Should Tender Award as recommended be supported by Council, then the following indicative Works Program shall be implemented:
|
Tender Award |
25 May 2016 |
|
Construction Commencement |
July 2016 |
|
Contract Completion |
October 2016 |
Consultation
Information on the project scope and schedule will be provided to the adjoining residents and all affected parties prior to the commencement of works.
Comment
The evaluation undertaken by the Tender Evaluation Panel resulted in tender submission from Southern Wire achieving the highest score in accordance with the selection criteria and weightings as detailed in the Tender document. Option 2 was the preferred option as the materials conform to Australian Standards and represent the best value of money.
A financial assessment of Southern was undertaken which indicated a “Strong” financial rating. The company is trading in a profitable manner and the size of its annual revenue indicates that the contract in question is within its financial capacity and presents a low risk to the City.
Reference checks of Southern were undertaken with positive results, confirming their ability to meet the requirements of the contract.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City’s existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of the City's Purchasing Policy.
Financial Implications
Project cost based on the recommended tenderer’s price is summarised below:
|
Tender 01623 – Fabrication and Installation of Garrison Style Perimeter Fencing to part of Marangaroo Golf Course (PR-3015) |
||
|
Description |
Expenditure |
Budget |
|
Budget: |
|
|
|
Allocated Project Management Budget for 2015/16 |
|
$490,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure: |
|
|
|
Project costs to 30 April 2016 |
$6,519 |
|
|
Commitments as at 30 April 2016 |
$13,748 |
|
|
Construction costs based on the Recommended tenderer’s price |
$439,000 |
|
|
Contingency |
$15,000 |
|
|
Outstanding project costs to be committed separate to Tender |
$15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenditure |
$489,267 |
|
Sufficient funds are available in PR-3015 to complete the works.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS Tender submitted by Southern Wire Pty Ltd for Tender No. 01623 for Fabrication and Installation of Garrison Style Perimeter Fencing to part of the Marangaroo Golf Course for the tendered lump sum of $439,000 in accordance with the term and conditions specified in the tender document.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 205
Parks & Conservation Management
3.18 Tender No 01627 Supply and Application of Fertiliser and Wetting Agents for a Period of 36 months
File Ref: 26096 – 16/149320
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No.01627 for the Supply and Application of Fertilisers and Wetting Agents in Turf for a period of 36 months commencing 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2019.
Background
The supply and application of fertiliser and wetting agents to active and passive parks has previously been managed through period quotations. Due to the expected increase in the volume of the required service into the future it is now prudent to move to a public tender process to ensure that the City is compliant with the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations.
Detail
Tender No. 01627 for the Supply and Application of Fertilisers and Wetting Agents was advertised on 19 March 2016 and closed on 12 April 2016. A copy of the tender document is available in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Essential details of the proposed contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type |
Schedule of rates |
|
Contract Duration |
36 months |
|
Commencement Date |
1 June 2016 |
|
Expiry Date |
31 May 2019 |
|
Extension Permitted |
Yes, Two 12 month options |
Tender submissions were received from the following contractors:
· Turfcare WA Pty Ltd; and
· Turfmaster Pty Ltd.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising of the City’s Coordinator Parks Maintenance North, Coordinator Parks Maintenance South, Principal Technical Advisor and with oversight and guidance from the Contracts Officer, has evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria:
|
Selection Criteria |
Weighting |
|
Price for the services offered |
20% |
|
Demonstrated previous experience |
20% |
|
Demonstrated methodology and approach |
20% |
|
Plant and equipment |
20% |
|
Demonstrated compliance with OH&S requirements (safety management) |
20% |
Price for the services offered (20%)
This criterion was based on the estimated cost to the City over the term of the contract based on rates submitted by the tenderers in the price schedule and has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
2 |
Demonstrated relevant experience in similar works with achievement of client expectations (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the tenderers' experience in supplying services of a similar nature and circumstances.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd and Turfmaster Pty Ltd demonstrated extensive experience in the application of fertiliser and wetting agents in turf. Turfcare WA Pty Ltd provided details of relevant contracts and clients including the Cities of Wanneroo, Fremantle and Cockburn. Turfmaster Pty Ltd gave examples of the Cities of Wanneroo, Stirling and Melville.
The information provided has resulted in tenderers being ranked as follows under this evaluation criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
1 |
Demonstrated methodology and approach to undertake the services (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the tenderers staff, resources and methodology to deliver the services required by the City.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd provided a well-documented methodology, detailed staff information and demonstrated having significant modern resources to deliver this service.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided adequate information on their methodology, detailed information on staff, and had a detailed list of available plant and equipment.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
2 |
Demonstrated compliance with OH&S requirements (safety management) (20%)
The evaluation of safety management was based on the tenderers’ submitted occupational health and safety (OHS) policy documentation, working documentation, and responses to the OHS Management System Questionnaire. Evidence of completed examples of incident reports, near misses and hazard inspections were asked to be provided.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd provided a detailed submission which included comprehensive policies, procedural documentation and demonstrated the use of working documentation including comprehensive risk assessments, incident reports, hazard reports, induction checklists, training records and toolbox records.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd provided a detailed submission on safety management; however, no examples of completed documents were submitted. Due to a recent safety performance issue at one of the City sites, Turfmaster Pty Ltd was awarded a lower score under this criterion.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
2 |
Plant and Equipment (20%)
The evaluation of this criterion considered the tenderers submitted list of plant and equipment to be used in the services to be provided.
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd proposes to use latest technology low footprint golf course equipment fitted with GPS tracking systems and fully shrouded spray booms to alleviate non target application to plant species and increased community safety.
Turfmaster Pty Ltd proposes to use GPS guided 3 tonne trucks, tractor mounted fertiliser hopper spreaders and Toyota Landcruisers. There was no mention of these hoppers being trackable through GPS technology and Turfmaster Pty Ltd does not propose to use shrouded spray booms for their spraying applications.
The information provided has resulted in the tenderers being ranked as follows under this criterion:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
2 |
Overall weighted score
The overall ranking as summarised below is based on the tenderer’s scores against each criterion and its weighting:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
2 |
Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was assessed as having the necessary experience, resources, operational capacity and safety management systems to fulfil the requirements of the contract.
The key characteristics of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s tender are:
· Relevant experience with similar fertiliser and wetting agent spraying operations including being a current service provider with the City of Wanneroo; and
· Qualified key personnel and modern safe equipment to enable the services to be rendered successfully and with the least amount of risk to the community.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The evaluation undertaken by the Tender Evaluation Panel resulted in the tender submission from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd achieving the highest score in accordance with the selection criteria and weighting and therefore Turfcare WA Pty Ltd is the recommended tenderer.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Sustainability Implications
The use of wetting agents on active sports fields will allow the City to reduce its water use on these areas and to remain within Department of Water allocations.
Risk Management Considerations
Operational Risk
The condition of the City’s parks and reserves can deteriorate quickly if not maintained to an acceptable level. The inability of a contractor to supply these services will result the degradation of the City’s assets and the City not providing the required standard of service to its residents.
The recommended tenderer, Turfcare WA Pty Ltd is assessed to have the required experience, staff, equipment, safety systems and operational capacity to meet the contract requirements, thus mitigating these risks.
Financial Risk
A previous independent financial assessment of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd was undertaken by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd in October 2015 as part of the tender evaluation process for contracts 01545 and 01546. The financial assessment raised a concern about Turfcare WA Pty Ltd’s ability to meet the minimum desired financial criteria for these contracts.
The actual financial risk to the City for this contract is assessed to be low as the contract is based on a schedule of rates for services supplied upon request by the City, with the services paid for after satisfactory completion and inspection by the City.
The City is receiving satisfactory services from Turfcare WA Pty Ltd under two recently awarded contracts for Turf Renovation Services and Supply and Apply of Pesticides in Turf and is the current provider of the Supply and Application of Fertilisers and Wetting Agents under a period quotation.
In addition, an annual financial report from Corporate Scorecard will be initiated to monitor the financial performance of Turfcare WA Pty Ltd.
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Purchasing Policy.
Financial Implications
The annual cost associated with the Supply and Application of Fertilisers and Wetting Agents is estimated to be in the order of $225,000 and included in the annual Parks Maintenance Operational Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Turfcare WA Pty Ltd for Tender No. 01627 for the Supply and Application of Fertilisers and Wetting Agents as per the schedule of rates and in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document, noting that the commencement date of the contract shall be 1 June 2016 and expiry date of the contract shall be 31 May 2019, with options to extend the contract for two 12 month periods, at the City’s discretion, subject to (a) satisfactory performance; and (b) price adjustment of the 3 year rates based on the Perth Consumer Price Index.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 210
Community & Place
File Ref: 6527 – 16/84520
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: CP05-03/16 - Project Status and Update - Project Number PR-2477 Coastal Risk Assessments - Ordinary Council - 01 Mar 2016 7.00pm
Issue
To consider the provision of financial support to the City’s Quinns Mindarie and Yanchep Surf Life Saving Clubs.
Background
At its meeting held on 1 March 2016, Council considered report CP05-03/16 Project Status and Update – Project Number PR-2477 Coastal Risk Assessments. As a result Council resolved, amongst other things the following:
“3. That Administration continues its investigation of the various service arrangements between Surf Clubs and other local governments and reports the findings back to the May Council meeting for consideration of financial support to the Quinns Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club and Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club in recognition of their contributions in delivering the recommendations of the Coastal Safety Risk Audit Reports commissioned by Council and prepared by Surf Life Saving Western Australia (SLSWA) in 2013.), including their various coastal aquatic safety education and awareness programs; and”
The “recommendations of the Coastal Safety Risk Audit Reports” referred to in the above recommendation include the provision of Voluntary Lifesaving Services and Education and Awareness Programs.
In respect to the current activities of the Quinns Mindarie and Yanchep Surf Life Saving Clubs, their current voluntary patrol times (based on the recently completed 2015/16 season) and those of SLSWA (as a part of their contact with the City) are as follows:
Volunteer Lifesavers (Clubs):
|
2015 - 2016 |
October |
November |
December – March |
April |
|||||
|
Quinns Mindarie |
Saturday |
17-Oct |
09:30-14:00 |
Continue |
09:30-14:00 |
Continue |
09:30-14:00 |
Fin 25th |
09:30-14:00 |
|
Sunday |
18-Oct |
09:30-14:00 |
Continue |
08:30-15:00 |
Continue |
08:30-15:00 |
Fin 26th |
08:30-15:00 |
|
|
Yanchep |
Saturday |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday |
|
|
1-Nov |
08:00-12:00 |
Continue |
08:00-12:00 |
Fin 3rd |
08:00-12:00 |
|
Lifeguards:
|
Quinns Beach |
1-Dec |
31-Mar |
Mon - Fri |
8:00 |
13:00 |
|
Yanchep Beach |
1-Dec |
28-Mar |
Mon - Sat |
9:00 |
16:00 |
|
Sun |
12:00 |
16:00 |
|||
|
29-Mar |
30-Apr |
Fri - Mon |
9:00 |
16:00 |
The Clubs and SLSWA beach safety education and awareness orientated activities include:
· Community programs delivered at these locations (School programs and SurfBabies) by SLSWA with club support (i.e providing a venue and a ‘meet and greet’ for the participants) subject to availability of club members;
· SLSWA have delivered Multicultural BeachSAFE programs at Quinns Mindarie, with the CaLD participants touring the club and meeting the members;
· First aid training for community groups (e.g Yanchep SLSC providing training for local soccer club and Yanchep High School); and
· Providing training in respect to Surf Rescue Certification. The Yanchep SLSC have recently provided this training to local teachers so that they are able to conduct beach activities.
In addition to this, the Clubs Club Development orientated activities include:
· Clubs participates in internal SLSWA activities in relation to member communication and consultation forums (across all areas of Surf Life Saving business) which also includes annual workshops around Director responsibilities and good governance activities;
· Provision of in-house training for members. For example the Yanchep SLSC has three members who have Training Assessor Certificates, which enables them to conduct Beach Management Training course (3 months in duration) for members;
· Provision of training to upskill members, ie spinal injury management; and
· Core club development/management activities undertaken as a part of normal club activities.
Detail
Review of Existing Arrangements
Administration has undertaken a review of existing service/funding arrangements between metropolitan and regional surf lifesaving clubs and Local Government. A summary of the outcomes of this review has been included within Attachment 1.
By way of summary, the following key outcomes have been identified as a result of the review process:
1. Payment to Surf Life Saving Clubs for Services?
A total of four of the ten Local Governments contacted indicated that they do provide an annual payment to their respective clubs, either as a set payment or based on patrol hours. Payments ranged from $2,000 to $62,000 per annum.
2. Services Provided by Clubs?
Clubs generally provide a weekend and public holiday beach safety service. This is consistent with the services currently provided by the Quinns Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club and the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club.
3. Payment to Surf Life Saving WA (SLSWA) for Services?
A total of five of the Local Governments contacted engaged Surf Life Saving WA for the provision of professional lifeguard services in addition to those services provided by their resident clubs. Specific dollar amounts have not been identified within this report, given the contractual nature of the individual agreements. It should be noted that the City of Stirling provides their own full time service.
4. Services Provided by SLSWA?
For those Local Governments who do engage SLSWA, all do so on the basis of SLSWA providing professional lifeguard services to patrol identified beaches on weekdays during the summer season (generally defined from April to October 2016).
5. Payment of Lease Fees by the Club?
A total of seven of the ten Local Governments contacted advised that their respective clubs did lease the facilities from which they operate. These leases were essentially on a minimal fee or “peppercorn basis” with some responsibility for payment of utilities etc. This is consistent with the City of Wanneroo’s Tenancy Policy.
In respect to the City’s Surf Life Saving Clubs, their current patrol schedules and related activities appear to be consistent with the other identified metropolitan sur lifesaving clubs.
Proposed Funding Model
In considering the provision of financial support for the City’s clubs, a model based primarily on the provision of voluntary lifeguard patrols, with a secondary focus on beach safety and awareness activities, and club development activities would be considered appropriate. The detail of such a model could include the following:
|
Criteria |
Outcomes Required |
|
1. Voluntary Lifeguard Patrols |
· Provision of services for the summer season, as defined by the approved Annual Life Saving Service Agreement (Note – approved annually by the City of Wanneroo, SLSWA and the Club prior to each season); |
|
2. Beach Safety & Education Awareness |
· Ongoing delivery of Beach Safety and Education Awareness activities, as agreed; · Noting that this would be included as an attachment to the existing Annual Life Saving Service Agreement. |
|
3. Club Development Activities |
· Ongoing delivery of Club Development activities, as agreed; · Noting that this would be included as an attachment to the existing Annual Life Saving Service Agreement. |
In terms of a weighting of the above criteria (should it be deemed necessary), a suggested prioritisation would be as follows:
1. Voluntary Lifeguard Patrols – 50%
2. Beach Safety & Education Awareness – 30%
3. Club Development Activities – 20%
The rationale for the model, as proposed above, is as follows:
1. Voluntary Lifeguard Patrols – recognises that the clubs play an important role in the delivery of beach safety services every summer season through the provision of voluntary lifeguard patrols. This service augments the professional lifeguard service provided by SLSWA at the City’s main swimming beaches each summer season.
It also recognises the role that the Clubs can and do play in respect to emergency response situations.
2. Beach Safety and Education Awareness – recognises that clubs, through their normal day to day activities, undertake a role in the education of club members (and therefore the public) in respect to beach safety and awareness.
3. Club Development – recognises that for a club to be effective in the delivery of items one and two listed above, it is important that they continue to develop a strong and sustainable club in respect to membership development (patrolling, non-patrolling and junior members) and in the development and maintenance of effective governance structures.
In terms of payment, the proposed model envisages that 50% of the endorsed funding amount would be paid at the beginning of the season with 50% at the end of the season, upon receipt and acceptance of the club’s reporting against the three criterion identified above. For the purposes of this report, the season commencement and conclusion dates are October and April respectively, based on SLSWA definitions.
Review of the agreements is envisaged to occur annually based on the clubs reporting their service outcomes against the criteria identified above. This would be in the form of a written report, endorsed by the club committee, submitted by 31 May of each year. This report would be further supported by the provision of the audited financial statements of each club, once available at the end of the club’s financial year.
Consultation
Consultation has occurred with the Quinns Mindarie and Yanchep Surf Life Saving Clubs and also with Surf Life Saving WA.
Comment
The review of arrangements within the metropolitan area indicates that the provision of funding by Local Governments in support of Surf Lifesaving Club activities is an established model. In addition, the implementation of a model within the City of Wanneroo which focuses on the key areas of Voluntary Surf Life Saving patrols, delivery of Beach Safety and Education Awareness activities and Club Development would appear to be in keeping with similar arrangements within Local Government and be sound in approach.
It is on this basis that this report will recommend that the City implement an annual funding arrangement with the Quinns Mindarie and Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Clubs, based on the criteria, payment and reporting mechanism outlined above. In doing so, this report will recommend that Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to prepare and enter into a Deed of Agreement with clubs on this basis, for a duration of three years, reviewed annually.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Currently there are no funds specifically allocated within the City’s operating budget for the provision of an annual payment to the clubs, as identified above.
As part of the 2016/17 operating budget development process, Administration has made an indicative allowance within the operating budget for the provision of an annual grant to the Clubs. This is based on an amount of up to $40,000 per club per annum.
As identified within this report, the key parameters of this agreement, and subsequent Deed of Agreement between the Clubs and the City would be as follows:
|
Key Parameters |
Detail |
|
Funding Amount and Payment |
· Up to $40,000 per annum per club (subject to Council budget consideration and endorsement); · Payment of 50% at the commencement of the season (October) and 50% at the end of each season (May), subject to meeting agreed outcomes; |
|
Funding Criteria |
· Provision of Voluntary Lifeguard Patrols; · Ongoing delivery of Beach Safety and Education Awareness activities, as agreed; and · Ongoing delivery of Club Development activities, as agreed. · Agreed each year as a part of the approved Annual Life Saving Service Agreement between the City of Wanneroo, the Club and Surf Life Saving WA. |
|
Reporting |
· Written report addressing action taken in respect to each of the three criteria, as agreed within the Annual Life Saving Service Agreement; · Submitted with formal Committee endorsement; · Required annually by 31 May each year; and · Provision of audited financial statements by the Clubs, once available at the end of each financial year.
|
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcome of the review of Service Arrangements between Surf Life Saving Clubs and Local Governments within the Perth Metropolitan area, as outlined within Attachment 1;
2. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to prepare individual Deeds of Agreement between the City of Wanneroo and the Quinns Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club and Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club, respectively, for the commencement of the 2016/17 summer season and based on the following key parameters:
|
Key Parameters |
Detail |
|
Funding Amount and Payment |
· Up to $40,000 per annum per club (subject to Council budget consideration and endorsement); · Payment of 50% at the commencement of the season (October) and 50% at the end of each season (May), subject to meeting agreed outcomes; |
|
Funding Criteria |
· Provision of Voluntary Lifeguard Patrols; · Ongoing delivery of Beach Safety and Education Awareness activities, as agreed; and · Ongoing delivery of Club Development activities, as agreed. · Agreed each year as a part of the approved Annual Life Saving Service Agreement between the City of Wanneroo, the Club and Surf Life Saving WA. |
|
Reporting |
· Written report addressing action taken in respect to each of the three criteria, as agreed within the Annual Life Saving Service Agreement; · Submitted with formal Committee endorsement; · Required annually by 31 May each year; and · Provision of audited financial statements by the Clubs, once available at the end of each financial year.
|
Attachments:
|
1. |
Summary of Existing Local Government Arrangements |
16/159682 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 218
File Ref: 14905 – 16/136927
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider a request from the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group for additional funding to support the implementation of the Hudson Park Master Plan.
Background
Hudson Park (the Park) is located at 33 Hudson Avenue, Girrawheen (Attachment 1) and is classified as a Neighbourhood Active Reserve. The property is Crown land vested in the City of Wanneroo for the purposes of public recreation.
At its meeting held on 15 April 2015, Council considered report C01-04/15 South Ward Active Reserve Master Planning Process Outcomes, and as a result resolved, amongst other things, the following:
“3. ENDORSES the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group’s recommended prioritisation of infrastructure upgrades for Hudson Park as follows:
“That the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group:-
a. ENDORSES Administration's prioritisation of infrastructure upgrades for Hudson Park for the 2014/15 financial year, as identified from the Reference Group at its meeting held on 13 August 2014 and to be funded from PR-2960 Hudson Park Infrastructure Upgrades ($250,000), as follows:
|
Year |
Financial Year |
Item |
Preliminary Cost Est. |
|
1 |
14/15 |
Design Flood Lighting - Hudson Park; |
$25,000 |
|
1 |
14/15 |
Design + Construct "Family Area" to support existing playground area; |
$75,000 |
|
1 |
14/15 |
Design and construct Path network around the perimeter of the park, providing connections to the active reserve and other infrastructure in place, and with the provision of park benches on the path network; |
$100,000 |
|
1 |
17/18 |
Review and Upgrade Security lighting for the car park; |
$40,000 |
|
1 |
14/15 |
Clearing of the undergrowth to improve passive surveillance; |
$0 |
|
|
14/15 |
Total Expenditure |
$240,000 |
b. NOTES Administration will commence the development of the required Design Briefs to commence the projects identified in the above recommendation in the current financial year; and
c. ENDORSES Administration's list of infrastructure upgrades for Hudson Park to be listed for consideration as part of the City's Active Master Plan – South Zone Report and for consideration within the 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget;
|
Year |
Financial Year |
Item |
Preliminary Cost Est. |
|
2 |
15/16 |
Construction Flood Lighting - Hudson Park (2) |
$250,000 |
|
2 |
15/16 |
Design - New change rooms, toilets and showers; |
$80,000 |
|
2 |
15/16 |
Provision of a backnet for baseball and softball; |
$12,000 |
|
2 |
14/15 |
Upgrade of the existing cricket nets to include full length netting of the wicket and full length carpet. |
$50,000 |
|
|
15/16 |
Total Expenditure |
$342,000 |
|
3 |
16/17 |
Construct - New change rooms with toilets and showers; |
$780,000 |
|
|
16/17 |
Total Expenditure |
$780,000 |
|
4 |
17/18 |
Conversion of the existing tennis into multipurpose hard courts to include basketball and netball. Courts to be open access to the community with not bookings required; |
$70,000 |
|
4 |
17/18 |
Installation Outdoor fitness equipment circuit around the perimeter of the park; |
$60,000 |
|
4 |
17/18 |
Additional car park located on Arnos Way; |
$50,000 |
|
|
16/17 |
Total Expenditure |
$220,000” |
Consequently, the project priorities identified in the 2015/16 financial year were included within the adopted 2015/16 Capital Works Budget.
In progressing the project priorities identified for Hudson Park, a Master Plan was developed (Attachment 2) and was subject to a community engagement process as outlined within the consultation section of this report.
Detail
The current project priorities in respect to the implementation of the Hudson Park Master Plan (Attachment 2) are as follows:
· Family Area;
· Footpath Networks;
· Relocation and construction of new Cricket Nets; and
· Install of Baseball/Softball Backnet;
The floodlighting project was approved by the CEO on 19 April 2016 with works scheduled to commence on 12 May 2016.
Administration is progressing the remaining items on the Hudson Park prioritisation list for 2014/15 with the clearing of the undergrowth around the venue now a part of the Parks Maintenance team routine works at Hudson Park. The car park security lighting audit is in the process of being finalised and the changeroom design is currently being progressed as a part of the Active Reserves Master Plan Building Needs and Assessment Project.
The South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group (the Working Group) met on 17 February 2016 to consider the Hudson Park Master Plan and the community engagement outcomes. A copy of the Agenda and Meeting Minutes have been included as (Attachment 3.) In considering this report, the Working Group made the following amended recommendation:
“That the Working Group;
1. SUPPORTS the Hudson Park Draft Master Plan as shown in Attachment 1 with costings for the following requested items to be presented to Council;
a) Conversion of sand softfall to rubber softfall in the existing playground amenity; and
b) Footpath commencing from the existing carpark to the Clubrooms.”
The amendment to the recommendation by the Working Group was based on the results of the community engagement process, in which those members of the community, who attended the onsite consultation session, strongly indicated their preference for the replacement of the proposed sand softfall with rubber softfall. In addition to this, the community members also were strong in their views that the provision of a path connection from the car park to the existing clubrooms was also required.
The views of the community reflected within the onsite consultation session were supported by the Working Group, and thus reflected within their amended recommendation. Administration’s advice to the Working Groups was that rubber softfall should be considered for the combination play unit only, with sand softfall being provided for the swings. This was on the basis that rubber softfall used for swing units wears quicker and that there is emerging evidence that indicates that sand softfall causes fewer injuries falling from swings compared to other softfall options.
Administration has investigated of the two proposed changes and can advise that the cost estimate for the provision of rubber softfall for the combination swing unit is $74,000 and for the provision of the additional path from the car park to the existing clubrooms is $23,000. The total cost of the two items is $97,000, rounded up to $100,000.
Consultation
In respect to the Hudson Park Master Plan (Attachment 2), an informing community engagement process was conducted between 18 January and February 1 2016. This included the following consultation strategy, as endorsed by Administration's Community Engagement Advisor.
· Distribution of the draft concept plan (Attachment 2) to all residents within a 400 metre radius of the Park;
· Inclusion of the concept plan on the City's web site under the 'Your Say' section; and
· Community Workshop on site on February 1 2016,
Administration received a total of 1 comment from the 509 mailed out local residents. To support the mail out the City undertook a workshop exercise, (attended by approximately 20 residents) on site, on February 1 2016 with the following comments recorded;
· Installation of a Water Fountain;
· Rubber softfall is preferred over sand softfall for the playground;
· Footpath needs to be wide enough for kids to ride their bikes;
· More bins are to be provided once the upgrade is complete;
· More seating at Arnos way side of the reserve;
· Footpath from Gayford Way to Arnos Way;
· Footpath connecting the carpark to the playing field; and
· To relocate the Hudson Ave footpath connection further east
In considering the additional items listed above, the following Administration advice was provided:
Installation of a Water Fountain
A water fountain is already proposed within the family area of the Hudson Park Master Plan.
Change of sand softfall to rubber softfall.
Through the consultation process many of the residents supported the proposed Master Plan for Hudson Park; however concern was expressed at the proposal to leave the existing sand softfall supporting the combination unit and swings. Resident's concern centred on the anti-social behaviour seen at the park and the resulting rubbish and other items left at the park, which could pose a hazard to children using the play equipment. Concerns regarding anti-social behaviour were also discussed during the on-site community workshop, with residents having a very strong view of the need to replace sand with alternative softfall options.
Footpath needs to be wide enough for Kids to ride their bikes
The City’s design team has confirmed that the footpaths proposed for the Master Plan are 2.5 meters wide.
More Bins
The request of more bins can be accommodated internally once the Master Planning Elements have been completed.
More Seating at Arnos Way
The request of more seating can be accommodated internally once the Master Planning Elements have been completed.
Footpath from Gayford Way to Arnos Way
An elderly resident living on Gayford Way enquired about the possibility of having a footpath link from Gayford Way to the proposed footpath. Advice from the design team is the link was considered in the design phase and was decided that the terrain is too steep to provide a path that would be of benefit to the residents. In addition, it was recognised that the footpath could potentially require a clearing permit with the number of trees located on that side.
Footpath connecting the carpark to the playing field
Currently there is no proposed direct foot path connecting the car park to the clubrooms. Advice from the Design Team is that the contours of this area would require level landings to be considered in design of a footpath which is an expense not currently allocated for in the project budget. The proposed Master Plan does however link the clubrooms via the family area to the car park, on a more accommodating gradient.
To relocate the Hudson Ave footpath connection further east
The resident in Number 25 Hudson Avenue expressed her concern at having the path connection from the park to the existing Hudson Ave Path so close to her residence. The Resident cited that shopping trolleys are left already on the corner near their lot and having the path there would create further build-up of disregarded trollys. Administration believes the request is easily accommodated and will request the path is moved further east.
Comment
In summary, the current project budget from PR-2960 Hudson Park Infrastructure Upgrades does not have the capacity to accommodate the rubber softfall installation and the path connection to the clubrooms. In acknowledging the financial statues for the Hudson Park Master Plan upgrades The Working Group have provided direction to Administration to seek additional funding for both items to occur within this current financial year.
Statutory Compliance
The outcomes of the South Ward Active Reserve Master Planning process are required to be compliant with the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group Terms of Reference (Attachment 4).
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
In respect to the Active Reserve Master Planning process undertaken by the Reference Group, consideration has been given to the City's Local Planning 4.3 Public Open Space Policy, City's Floodlighting Policy and the City's Facility Hire and Use Policy.
Implementation of the outcomes of the process will also need to consider the City’s Community Engagement Policy.
In respect to the financial implications, the City’s Accounting Policy Section 3(g)(c) states:
“Circumstances:
…the budget allocation for a capital work project is insufficient.
Action:
In accordance with Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 by way of a report and recommendation to the Council seeking authorisation of the expenditures and to endorse the necessary budget variation.”
Financial Implications
The current project budget for the implementation of the current project priorities is as outlined in the table below:
|
Item |
Budget ($) |
|
Footpaths |
$240, 000 |
|
Family Area |
$78 ,623 |
|
Family Area - Optional Items |
$20, 000 |
|
Cricket Nets |
$80, 780 |
|
Baseball Back Nets |
$19, 145 |
|
Car Park Lighting* |
$20, 000 |
|
TOTAL |
$459, 000 |
*Car park lighting expenditure will be determined by the outcomes of the car park lighting audit.
As outlined previously in this report, the cost of the provision of rubber softfall for the combination swing unit is $74,000 and for the provision of the additional path from the car park to the existing clubrooms is $23,000. The total cost of the two items is $97,000, rounded up to $100,000. This additional cost is not able to be met by the current project budget.
As a result, Administration has undertaken a review of existing projects within the South Ward to identify any confirmed cost savings that may be used to off-set the cost of the provision of the rubber softfall and the additional path network. This review has resulted in the identification of budget savings in the project PR-2823 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - Building Renewal Works from the Asset Management Plan, with sufficient funds to undertake the following transfer of funds to the implementation of the Hudson Park projects, as outlined below.
|
Project Number |
Description |
From (Municipal Funding Available Though Project Savings) |
To (Municipal Funding Required) |
|
PR-2823 |
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - Building Renewal Works from the Asset Management Plan |
$100,000 |
|
|
PR-2960 |
Hudson Park Infrastructure Upgrades Project |
|
$100,000 |
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group’s amended recommendation as a result of its consideration of Item 4.2 Hudson Park Master Plan Consultation, at its meeting held on 17 February 2016 as follows:
“That the Working Group:-
1. SUPPORTS the Hudson Park Draft Master Plan as shown in Attachment 1 with costings for the following requested items to be presented to Council;
a) Conversion of sand softfall to rubber softfall in the existing playground amenity; and
b) Footpath commencing from the existing carpark to the Clubrooms
2. REQUESTS that future consideration is given for a path connection from Gayford Way and Arnos Way;
3. NOTES the comments as a result of the community consultation; and
4. RECOGNISES and THANKS the community for its involvement in the community consultation component of the project.”
2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure listed in the following table, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for the Provision of Rubber Softfall to the Combination Play Unit and a path connection from the car park to the existing clubrooms at Hudson Park:
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Adjusted Budget |
|
Provision of Rubber Softfall to the Combination Play Unit and a path connection from the car park to the existing clubrooms at Hudson Park |
PR-2960 |
$459,000 |
$559,000 |
3. APPROVES the following budget amendment to fund the project funding shortfall for the Hudson Park Infrastructure Upgrade Projects;
|
Project Number |
From |
To |
Description |
|
PR-2823 |
$100,000 |
|
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - Building Renewal Works from the Asset Management Plan |
|
PR-2960 |
|
$100,000 |
Hudson Park Infrastructure Upgrades Project |
4. THANKS the South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User group for their ongoing contribution to the project.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Hudson Park -Site Map |
16/144637 |
|
|
2. |
Hudson Park Master Plan |
16/159662 |
|
|
3. |
Agenda and Minutes |
16/146164 |
|
|
4. |
South Ward Community Reference and Sporting User Group |
14/64046 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 248
File Ref: 23853 – 16/89585
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Previous Items: CD06-05/11 - Jimbub Reserve - Community Consultation and Design - Ordinary Council - 31 May 2011 7.00pm
Issue
To consider the proposed concept design for the development of the Jimbub Reserve Changerooms and Floodlighting.
Background
Jimbub Reserve (the Reserve) is located at 120 Waldburg Drive, Tapping (Attachment 1) and is classified as a Neighbourhood Active Reserve. The property type is Crown land vested in the City of Wanneroo for the purposes of recreation.
At its meeting held on 31 May 2011 Council considered report CD06-05/11 - Jimbub Reserve - Community Consultation and Design and resolved the following:
“1. ENDORSES the Jimbub Reserve Landscape Master Plan as shown on Drawing No. 2614-1-0 and contained in Attachment 1;
2. INSTRUCTS Administration to proceed with the construction of Jimbub Reserve in accordance with the endorsed Landscape Master Plan;
3. THANKS the Community for its involvement by replying to submissions received during the community consultation process; and
4. REFERS the matter for Traffic management study.”
A copy of the endorsed Jimbub Reserve Master Plan has been included in (Attachment 2). The Master Plan provides for the staged development of the following facilities at the Reserve:
· Irrigation and turf installation;
· Planting and pathway;
· Park furniture and equipment;
· Play equipment;
· BBQ
· Fitness equipment;
· Cricket practice nets.
· Sports Amenities Building;
· Car park; and
· Floodlighting.
The construction of the Reserve was undertaken by the developer, being the Satterley Property Group (SPG), who was responsible for the filling-in of the original swamp, development of an onsite swale, all bulk earth works, as well as obtaining a bore for the site.
In January 2012, Earthcare Landscapes Pty Ltd was awarded the tender for the construction of Jimbub Reserve (Stage One). These works included the installation of turf, sports goals, the central cricket wicket, path networks and passive planting.
Following the development of the playing field, drainage issues were identified in respect to the playing surface and as a result the second stage of the reserve development was placed on hold until the drainage issues could be resolved.
In response to the drainage issues identified, Administration implemented a sub soil drainage system (over three stages) to improve the drainage of water away from the playing surface. With this work undertaken, the stage two of the reserve development was progressed. This work included the following infrastructure and was completed in 2014.
· Playground equipment
· Cricket practice nets
· Exercise equipment
· Park furniture
· Park signage
The provision of a BBQ was delayed until the Sports Amenities Building was constructed to provide the necessary power supply.
Detail
Sports Amenities Building
The location for the proposed Sports Amenities Building (the Building) is on the southern boundary of the active reserve, adjacent to Ashley Road (Attachment 3). This location is consistent with that identified in the original Master Plan (Attachment 2).
The concept plan for the Building has been included in Attachment 4 and was used as the basis for the consultation process. The concept plan includes:
|
Element |
Description |
|
Changerooms |
2 x 28m2 changeroom facilities including a 20m2 amenities area for each changeroom. |
|
Storerooms |
3 x 12m2 user group external storerooms. |
|
First Aid Room |
15m2 first aid room |
|
Umpires room |
19m2 includes 2 showers and toilet facilities |
|
Male & Female Toilets |
Male and female toilets that are separate facilities from changerooms and a separate universal access toilet. These facilities will service the reserve hirers. |
|
100m2 of Multipurpose Room |
Future provision as a stage 2, subject to demand. |
The proposed facility provision is considered to be appropriate for a neighbourhood level active reserve of this size (Reserve size of 6.3 ha and Playing Field size of 2.1 ha). The provision of a 100m2 of multipurpose room has been included as a future second stage, based on demand. It has not been included in the stage 1 development on the basis that there is not sufficient demand to justify the development of this space at the present time.
This position is consistent with the Draft Community Facility Standards which are currently being developed by Administration in respect to future community level sport infrastructure provision.
The draft Standards will propose all future neighbourhood level Active Open Space is provided with a sports amenities building of up to 100m2, subject to consideration through the planning process of:
· Number of user groups; and
· Specific sport requirements.
Future facility provision will be guided by the Draft Community Facility Standards. These will be based around the below existing hierarchy which applies to Active Open Space:
|
Designation |
Number of Ovals Provided* |
Size + |
Minimum Multipurpose Facility Provision |
Maximum Multipurpose Room Provision |
|
Local |
0 |
Between 0.4 and 1 ha |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Neighbourhood |
1 |
1 to 5ha |
0m2 |
100m2 |
|
District |
2 |
5 to 15+ha |
100m2 |
150m2 |
|
Regional |
More than 2 |
At least 20ha |
150m2 |
200m2 |
|
*1 Oval can host cricket, AFL, 2 x Rugby / Soccer fields |
||||
|
+based on classification framework developed by Department of Sport and Recreation(DSR) in 2012 and revised City of Wanneroo Local Planning Policy 4.3 – Public Open Space. |
||||
In accordance with the Draft Community Facility Standards that will ultimately be presented to Council for endorsement, the provision of such infrastructure would also be measured against the levels of activity at each location on a case by case basis specific to sport requirements and a clear demonstration of the need identified for the provision of the facilities within the minimum and maximum provision.
In terms of the broader catchment for the Reserve, the following table provides an overview of the other active reserves within the catchment and their current use.
|
Park |
Size |
Distance from Jimbub |
Facilities |
Current users |
Level of use per week (hours) |
|
Houghton Park |
5ha |
1.8km |
One playing field, floodlighting, sports amenities building, playground equipment, BMX facility |
Carramar FC Carramar Primary School Wanneroo Cricket Club Step into Life Wanneroo/ Joondalup Tee ball Wanneroo Lacrosse |
21 (W) 30 (A)
22 (S)
7 (A)
0.5 (S) 2 (S) |
|
Peridot Park |
3ha |
3.8km |
One playing field, toilet block, playground, floodlighting, tennis courts |
Neerabup Junior Football Club Carramar FC Neerabup Primary School
*No summer club usage |
8.5 (W)
7.5 (W)
35 (A) |
|
Lake Joondalup Park |
9.2ha |
3.5km |
One playing field, changerooms, toilets, cricket nets, floodlighting, playground, fitness equipment |
Wanneroo Cricket Club – Juniors Wanneroo Junior Football Club |
15 (S)
8 (W) |
|
Edgar Griffiths Park |
14.7ha |
3.8km |
One playing field, toilet block, playground, cricket nets, |
Wanneroo Cricket Club – Junior Wanneroo Cricket Club – Senior Wanneroo Little Athletics Club
|
17 (S)
11 (S)
5 (S) |
|
Wanneroo Showgrounds |
9.3ha |
4.7km |
One playing field, clubrooms, 3 x toilet blocks, tennis courts, pavilion, cricket nets, power supplies |
Wanneroo Cricket Club – Juniors Wanneroo Cricket Club – Seniors Wanneroo Junior Football Club Wanneroo Amateur Football Club Step into Life (Fitness) Nollamara RSL Swap Meets |
17 (S)
9.5 (S)
21 (W)
10.25 (W) 6.25 (W)
6 (A) |
Note: W – Winter, S – Summer, A - Annual
In respect to population growth within the catchment area, the table below outlines the anticipated growth within the locations of Wanneroo, Carramar and Tapping. As can be seen, the level of growth over the 10 year period will be significant, with the population threshold meeting the required 1:7,000 ratio for Neighbourhood POS (Active) (Northern Coastal Growth Corridor Community Facilities Plan, 2011).
The population of Wanneroo is expected to increase by 38% by the year 2024 and a 16% rise in population is anticipated for the suburb of Carramar.
|
Suburb |
2014 |
2024 |
Difference |
% |
|
Wanneroo |
12,749 |
17,706 |
+ 4,957 |
38% |
|
Carramar |
7,134 |
8,339 |
+ 1,205 |
17% |
|
Tapping |
9,791 |
10,001 |
+ 210 |
2% |
|
Total |
29,674 |
36,046 |
6,372 |
21% |
Source – Population Forecast id
To ensure access by the broader community to the building, it will be necessary to implement an appropriate management model that does not allow any one group or only a small number of groups to have dedicated exclusive use. Fundamentally, this will be achieved via the City’s Facility Hire and Use Policy, providing equitable access to all of the community.
Floodlighting
It is proposed to design and construct a 4 pole installation on the playing field (Attachment 5), to AS 2560.2.3 for large ball sport training, with capacity to increase to 100 lux at a future point in time.
As outlined in the Financial Implications section of this report, the total estimated cost for the installation is $165,000, with a CSRFF grant being sought for $50,000.
The floodlighting installation is currently scheduled to be completed in the 2017/18 financial year, to coincide with the completion of the Sports Amenities Building.
Car Park
It is proposed to construct an 86 bay car park to the south of the building to AS 2890.1 standards (Attachment 3).
The car park design and construction is estimated at $550,000 and no grant funding will be available for this component. The car park is scheduled to be completed in the 2017/2018 financial year to coincide with the completion of the Sports Amenities Building.
Project Schedule
The proposed timeframes for the Jimbub Reserve Sports Amenities Building, Floodlighting and Car Park are as follows:
|
Project Phase |
Timeframe |
|
Concept Design |
December 2015- March 2016 |
|
Detailed Design |
March 2016 – July 2016 |
|
Grant Application Submission |
September 2016 |
|
Advice from DSR – Grant |
February 2017 |
|
Tender Advertising and Evaluation |
March 2017 – June 2017 |
|
Construction |
July 2017 – February 2018 |
|
Practical Completion (Handover) |
February 2017 – March 2018 |
Additional Site Investigations
Subsequent to the previous work undertaken in respect to drainage of the site, Administration has identified ongoing issues in respect to the drainage at the reserve, which will require further investigation.
In the first instance this will include undertaking further hydrological and geotechnical investigation at Jimbub Reserve to determine the geotechnical conditions prior to any further development of the oval and construction of change room facilities. This is fundamentally due to ongoing nature of the drainage issues at the reserve and for Administration to be sure that the proposed further development on the site will not be adversely impacted upon into the future. This work will commence in the 2015/16 year and be completed in the 2016/17 year and will be funded via a transfer of $80,000 in project savings from PR-4012 Wesco Road, Nowergup – Stage 4 Upgrade and Widening.
A further report will be provided to Council should this work identify any issues within the site which impact on the delivery of the Sports Amenities Building, Floodlighting and Car Park.
Consultation
Community Consultation in respect to the Master Plan (Attachment 2) was undertaken with the residents who reside within 400 metres of the reserve.
A community information letter, as well as a copy of the Master Plan and public comment form was sent to residents. The public comment period commenced on 4 April 2011 and concluded on 29 April 2011.
The consultation period specifically for the changerooms and floodlighting was conducted between 4 April and 2 May 2016 and included the following consultation strategy, as endorsed by the City’s Community Engagement Advisor:
· Distribution of information letters and plans (Attachments 2 & 4) to residents and landowners within 400m from the Park, requesting that they take part by providing feedback and view the concept plan;
· Community consultation held onsite on 20 April 2016 to allow interested members of the public to view and discuss the draft concept plan with the relevant City of Wanneroo staff members and Elected members; and
· Inclusion of the concept plan and comment form on the City's web site under the 'Your Say" section.
Administration received 2 written submissions in total from 782 mails outs. Of those submissions, 1 writer was seeking additional security to combat the anti-social behaviour and sought to include a dog exercise area including sand and obstacles, the second writer requested a specialized dog play pen area. Approximately, thirty (30) community members attended the onsite consultation with 6 written comments accepted by City Officers.
The requests from this consultation included:
1. Water fountain including access for a dog bowl
2. Dog waste bags to be attached to bins around the park
3. Additional bins near the playground
4. Access to toilets during day
5. Adequate shade around building
6. Plant more trees around the park
7. Plants/mulch on north/east corner to be addressed as this area washes away
Administration has followed up on the queries from the consultation period and is able to provide the following responses:
1. A water fountain will be requested at detailed design stage
2. Dog waste bags will be placed on the City’s audit list with Waste Services
3. A request has been made to Waste Services
4. A request will be made to the project manager to have time locks costed and if within budget installed on the toilet block.
5. The building will have verandas to the front of the building (facing the park)
6. A request to parks maintenance to investigate the ability to plant additional trees around the park.
7. Will request that parks maintenance investigate this area and provide a solution
The request for a specific dog exercise area would be difficult to accommodate on site as the only available space for a fenced facility would be within the drainage basin, which would mean the facility would not be accessible during wet period and would create a potential risk at during high rainfall events. Jimbub Park has no restrictions in relation to dogs exercising in the park and dog waste bags are provided on site. Whilst not considered as part of this project, specific dog exercise areas within the City are being considered through the 2016/17 Capital Budget process, the location of these facilities have yet to be determined.
Administration has not received any concerns, objections or indications from the community suggesting that this project should not proceed. All of the attendees at the onsite consultation were supportive of the project and welcomed the further development of the POS.
Comment
Administration is of the view that the proposed facility provision, being the Sports Amenities Building, Floodlighting and Car Parking is appropriate for a neighbourhood level active reserve of this size. The consultation process did not result in any significant issues being identified and as a result the proposed concept and project timeframes remain unchanged.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City's Local Planning Policy 4.3 Public Open Spaces was used as the guiding framework for the development of the draft concept plan.
In respect to the financial implications, the City’s Accounting Policy Section 3(g)(c) states:
“Circumstances:
…the budget allocation for a capital work project is insufficient.
Action:
In accordance with Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 by way of a report and recommendation to the Council seeking authorisation of the expenditures and to endorse the necessary budget variation.”
Financial Implications
The total estimated cost for the Sports Amenities Building, Floodlighting and Car Park is $2,260,000 with the funding sources being the City of Wanneroo municipal funds and grant funding from the Department of Sport and Recreation ($616,333 CSRFF grant).
A summary of the combined project budget (Sports Amenities Building and Floodlighting) to form part of the draft 20 year Capital Works Budget has been outlined in the table below.
|
Year |
Description |
Car Park |
Flood- lighting |
S.A.B |
Total |
|
1 (2015/16) |
Detailed Design |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
3 (2017/18) |
Construction (Grant Funding) |
0 |
60,000 |
556,333 |
616,333 |
|
3 (2017/18) |
Construction (Municipal Funding) |
330,000 |
120,000 |
1,112,667 |
2,179,000 |
|
|
Construction Sub Total |
330,000 |
180,000 |
1,669,000 |
|
|
|
Total Project Cost |
|
|
|
2,260,000 |
As noted, Administration will be submitting a CSRFF grant application in the 2016 round for both projects.
Based on the submission of grant applications by the end of September 2016 and announcement of grant outcomes by the end of February 2017 (subject to Ministerial considerations and timeframes), it is envisaged that tender advertising will not occur until March 2017. Taking into consideration the timeframes required for tender advertising and evaluation, commencement of construction is not likely to occur until June/July 2017.
As outlined previously within this report, Administration will also be undertaking additional investigations into hydrological and geotechnical conditions at the site. These will be funded via the transfer of project savings, as noted within the table below.
|
Project |
Description |
From (Municipal Funding Available Through Project Savings) |
To (Municipal Funding Required) |
|
PR-4012 |
Wesco Road, Nowergup – Stage 4 Upgrade and Widening |
$96,067 |
|
|
PR-3087 |
Jimbub Reserve Hydrological and Geotechnical Site Investigations |
|
$80,000 |
|
Total |
$96,067 |
$80,000 |
|
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the Jimbub Reserve Sports Amenities Building, Car Park and Floodlighting Concept Plan shown in Attachment 3 and Attachment 5, respectively, of this report;
2. NOTES that a CSRFF Grant Application for $616,333 is scheduled to be submitted in September 2016, with notification by end of February 2017;
3. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure listed in the following table, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for the completion of further hydrological and geotechnical site investigations at Jimbub Reserve;
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Adjusted Budget |
|
Jimbub Reserve Hydrological and Geotechnical Site Investigations |
PR-4012 |
$0 |
$80,000 |
4. APPROVES the following budget amendment to fund the project funding shortfall for the Jimbub Reserve Hydrological and Geotechnical Site Investigations:
|
Project Number |
From |
To |
Description |
|
PR-4012 |
$80,000 |
|
Wesco Road, Nowergup – Stage 4 Upgrade and Widening |
|
PR-3087 |
|
$80,000 |
Jimbub Reserve Hydrological and Geotechnical Site Investigations |
5. NOTES that construction of the proposed development is estimated to commence by end July 2017 and will be concluded in March 2018; and
6. RECOGNISES and THANKS the community for its involvement in the community consultation component of the project.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Location Plan - Jimbub Reserve, |
16/132183 |
|
|
2. |
Landscape Plan - Jimbub Reserve |
16/132216 |
|
|
3. |
Building Location Plan - Jimbub Reserve |
16/132255 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Concept Floor Plan - Jimbub Reserve Sports Amenities Building |
16/132260 |
|
|
5. |
Lighting Towers - Jimbub Site Plan |
16/136303 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 262
File Ref: 25887 – 16/117779
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider petition PT01-04/16 regarding the development of a Skate Park facility in Yanchep.
Background
Petition PT01-04/16, containing 675 signatures, was tabled at the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 5 April 2016 requesting Council’s consideration as follows:
“For the design and implementation of a skate park facility in Yanchep in the City’s 2015/2016 budget in consultation with the community.”
It should be noted that the request as outlined within the petition is consistent with a Motion put by Mrs K Garbutt at the City’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on Tuesday 27 January 2016 (refer item 4.6). As a result of this Motion, Council resolved as follows:
“That the City of Wanneroo consider in their 2016/17 budget the design and installation of a skate plaza together with a family friendly park amenities in Yanchep that caters for all ages and levels of experience and includes community input into the design.”
In addition to this, the following was also resolved:
“Additionally, a youth working reference group be formed.”
Detail
As a result of the carried motion from the AGM, Administration (through the Community and Place Directorate) will undertake an engagement process with the Yanchep community in the coming financial year. The intention of this process is to understand community need in respect to the proposal.
It is intended that this process will include consultation with a broad range of stakeholders, with a specific reference on the involvement of young people from the area.
Consultation
As noted above, consultation will occur with a broad range of stakeholders, with a specific focus on young people in the area. These stakeholders include, but are not limited to the following:
· Local Youth Groups
· Skateboarding Groups and Associations
· Local Residents Associations
· Internal Staff
· Developers within the Yanchep Locality
The consultation will be conducted by internal staff from the Community and Place Directorate.
Comment
It should be noted that the petition request to undertake design and implementation of a skate park facility in Yanchep in the 2015/16 financial year will not be achievable given that the current financial year is almost at an end.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As the consultation and engagement with community will be undertaken internally by Administration, it is anticipated any expenditure in respect to the initial consultation process will be minimal. No budget has been allocated for this project at the time of this report for design and construction.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES Petition PT01-04/16 tabled at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 5 April 2016;
2. NOTES Administration will be undertaking the requested community consultation in the 2016/17 financial year to establish community need in respect to the proposal for the development of a skate park facility at Yanchep and related matters; and
3. AUTHORISES the Director Community and Place to advise the petition organisers of the outcomes of this report.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 264
File Ref: 1499 – 16/125596
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider petition PT05-04/16 presented to Council at its meeting held on 5 April 2016 seeking children's play facilities at Bowood Park, Darch.
Background
Bowood Park (the Park) is located on the corner of Porchester Drive and Bowood Road, Darch (Attachment 1). The Park is approximately 0.3 hectares in size and forms part of 1.36ha of land as defined in East Wanneroo Structure Plan – Cell 6 (Attachment 2). The City currently manages less than 25% of the proposed park. The remaining section of the park is in private ownership and awaiting development as part of the East Wanneroo Structure Plan – Cell 6.
Other existing public open space within the walkable catchment of the Park (400m to 800m, 5 minute to 10 minute walk) includes:
|
Park |
Location |
Description of Facilities |
|
Appleby Park |
410m east, Belgrade Road |
Part developed park with play equipment and shade sails, no major barriers |
|
Landsdale Park |
619m south/east, Landsdale Road |
Undeveloped, Bush Forever Conservation |
|
Monaghan Park |
818m west, Monaghan Circle |
Developed park with play equipment, across Kingsway Road. |
Detail
Petition PT01 – 11/14 specifically seeks the following:
"… that Council consider developing Bowood Park (located on Porchester Drive, Darch) into a park that residents could use, particularly young children and;
Prior to any development consult with and give the local community the opportunity to have on the design of the park…..
Bowood Park is listed for development within the City’s Passive Park Development Program as part of the draft 20 Year Capital Works Budget. On receiving the petition Administration has investigated the request and can advise the following:
· Bowood Park is approximately 25% managed by the City which lowers the rating through the prioritisation matrix (Attachment 3);
· Bowood Park is currently scheduled for development in 2024/25;
· The nearest park with play facilities is located at Appleby Park that is 410 metres to the east of Bowood Park; and
· Appleby Park is approximately 75% owned by the City and therefore has a higher priority through the same prioritisation matrix and is currently scheduled for further development in Year 2021/22.
Each park within the Passive Park Development Program is assigned $25,750 for park design, then $250,000 for the development of the park in the subsequent year. At present the program is set up to develop two passive parks per year, based on the outcomes of the priority matrix assessment. Currently, there are 18 parks listed on the program.
The Passive Parks program is revised every two years to ensure that the assessment against the priority matrix remains current, in respect to any changes in respect of the assessment criteria. The next review will occur in 2016 for the 2017/18 financial year, however it is unlikely that the position of Bowood Park will change sufficiently to bring on development into the near future.
Consultation
Consultation on the development of passive parks forms part of the concept design stage and involves a 28 day period of community consultation including an onsite event where residents can meet with City Officers and provide feedback and input to the proposed concept plan and park development.
Comment
Whilst the City recognises the need for development of Bowood Park, when measured against the prioritisation process it has a relatively low rating compared to park in other parts of the City. Until such time as the land parcels that form the ultimate area of Bowood Park are vested in the City, it is Administration’s recommended approach not to develop the park. This is also due to the fact that play equipment is currently available at Appleby Park, 410m east of Bowood Park.
It should be noted however, that Administration is currently investigating mobile playground options, which may be available to provide an interim service to local communities in this situation.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City's Local Planning Policy 4.3 Public Open Spaces is used to guide the level of development within the park.
Financial Implications
Currently Bowood Park is listed for development in 2024/25, based on the current passive park development list, which is informed by the prioritisation matrix as included within (Attachment 3).
As noted above, each park within the Passive Park Development Program is assigned $25,750 for park design, then $250,000 for the development of the park in the subsequent year. At present the program is set up to develop two passive parks per year, based on the outcomes of the priority matrix assessment.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the Petition PT05-04/16 tabled at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 5 April 2016;
2. NOTES that the development of Bowood Park is currently scheduled for the year 2024/25, based on the current prioritised passive park development list;
3. NOTES that Administration is currently investigating mobile playground options as a means to assist local communities in situations where there are extended timeframes for passive park development; and
4. AUTHORISES the Director Community and Place to advise the petition organisers of the outcomes of this report.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Bowood Park, Darch - Location Map |
16/126711 |
|
|
2. |
East Wanneroo SP - Cell 6 - Bowood Park |
16/126756 |
|
|
3. |
Development of Passive Parks - Matrix |
16/126589 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 270
File Ref: 13544 – 16/85705
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Yanchep Lagoon Trails and Pathways Master Plan.
Background
The Yanchep Lagoon Trails and Pathways Masterplan (the Masterplan) has been developed to support the Yanchep Lagoon and surrounding area (the precinct), covering a total area of approximately 8.85 hectares, the majority of which being bushland.
The intent of the Masterplan is to improve accessibility to the precinct for both residents and visitors alike and to increase activity within the area. The trails and pathways identified within the Master Plan will join together the various features and spaces within the precinct, whilst seeking to protect existing conservation areas from unauthorised access and to improve facilities and access overall.
The particular areas of Public Open Space which will be linked by the masterplan include:
|
Park |
Location |
Size |
Status |
|
Fisherman’s Hollow |
Brazier Rd, Yanchep |
5.69 ha |
Passive use, developed with playground, toilet black and other amenities |
|
Old Nursey Park |
5 Beachside Pde, Yanchep |
3.18 ha |
Passive use, developed with amenities and open space |
|
Picnic Cove |
Brazier Rd, Yanchep |
0.32 ha |
Passive Park, to be developed in next 24 months |
In addition to this, the Master Plan will provide linkages to the new Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club.
Detail
The initial concept for the Master Plan is included within (Attachment 1) and provides for the following elements:
|
Elements |
Description |
|
Trails |
Connecting trails, through bushland areas linking elements and providing access to various areas within the Masterplan |
|
Pathways |
Connecting pathways along road reserves to allow access to various aspects of the Masterplan and other wider local facilities |
|
Lookout |
Focal point for users in the area. |
The design philosophy supporting the concept has been to focus on the development of a Master Plan that promotes increased accessibility to the precinct and increased opportunities for children, family and adult recreation and leisure. The Master Plan has also sought to address barriers to access and areas of risk (i.e access from Yanchep Beach Road).
In addition to this, a number of the trails have been included to encourage interaction with both the natural and developed environment. In doing so, the Master Plan has taken into consideration connections between existing parks within the precinct, noting the availability of both active, passive pursuits, irrigated and un-irrigated parks.
Key elements of the Master Plan (Attachment 1) include:
· Pedestrian access from Yanchep Beach Road to Capricorn Esplanade (540m concrete footpath, 2.5m wide);
· Pedestrian access from Brazier Road to the upper lookout area (unsuitable for vehicular access);
· Pedestrian access from Newman Road to connect to access track up to upper lookout area;
· Pedestrian access from Fisherman’s Hollow to upper lookout area;
· Identification of pockets of revegetation, south and east of Brazier Road (to prevent additional access);
· Removal and rehabilitation of the access around existing Surf Club to beach – to occur upon completion of new facility;
· Formalisation of the beach access south of existing Surf Club - to be considered as part of Picnic Cove redevelopment (by others);
· Provision of additional shower and drink fountain facilities at lower lookout area, 290m2 (by others); and
· Beach access opposite Fisherman’s Hollow to be upgraded, approx. 47m (by others).
The Master Plan included in (Attachment 1) formed the basis of the community engagement process.
Consultation
The community consultation period was conducted between 5 January and 8 February 2016 and included the following communication strategy, as endorsed by the City’s Community Engagement Advisor:
· Distribution of an information letter to residents within an approximate 400m radius of the area, requesting that they take part in online feedback and view the concept plan.
· Providing residents an opportunity to contact City officers to request direct mailing of plans and surveys.
· Inclusion of the concept plan and comment form on the City's web site under the 'Your Say" section.
· The draft Master Plan (Attachment 1) was the basis of the consultation process.
Administration received a total of five email submissions as a result of the mail out to 381 residents; a response rate of 1.3%.
Of the five responses, there was no obvious indication of whether respondents supported or did not support the proposal, though several changes and additions were indicated. These changes include, though are not exclusive to:
· Creation of a lookout area at the top of the trail;
· Additional bins along pathways; and
· Removal of second trail from Newman Rd.
A summary of consultation feedback is included as per (Attachment 2).
It should also be noted that further community engagement will occur as a part of the implementation of the individual projects identified within the Master Plan on an as required basis.
Comment
Following from the consultation, points which were raised from the feedback have been reflected in the adjusted masterplan. These include:
· Additional waste disposal locations at the entrances to pathways;
· Reduced pathways leading up to the lookout area; and
· Upgrade upper lookout area to include a shelter, seating, solar lighting and interpretive signage.
The feedback also provided options that are not considered viable by Administration due to environmental and cost consideration. These include:
· Access path from Brazier Road (behind existing café) to the lookout area.
o Due to the steep incline, the cost for implementation of such a path is considered prohibitive and impractical.
· Ramp from Fisherman’s Hollow to lookout area to allow for wheelchair access.
o The length of the path required would be prohibitive, and would increase the need to clear most of the vegetated area from around the path. Wheelchair access would be available to the lookout from Brazier Road to the north of the lookout.
The pedestrian access from Yanchep Beach Road to Capricorn Esplanade (540m concrete footpath, 2.5m wide) requires to be considered alongside the redevelopment of the road reserve and should form part of that project. The timeframe for the delivery of this project has yet to be determined and is linked to the upgrading of the junction of Yanchep Beach Road, Brazier Rod and Two Rocks Road.
Based on the feedback from the consultation, a revised Master Plan (Attachment 3) has been produced. As a consequence, this report will recommend that the revised Master Plan (Attachment 3) be the basis for the future development of trails and pathways within the Yanchep Lagoon precinct.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Based on the revised Master Plan (Attachment 3), a preliminary Order of Cost Estimate has been produced for the project (Attachment 4), a summary of which is outlined in the table below. This information has also been arranged in an indicative priority order by Administration based on an assessment of need.
|
Aspect |
Estimated Cost $ |
Priority |
|
Access to Upper Lookout area from Brazier Rd |
233,700 |
1
|
|
Access from Newman Road to track to upper lookout area |
28,260 |
1
|
|
Revegetation south and east of Brazier Road |
137,000 |
2
|
|
Upgrade Destination of the upper lookout area |
242,500 |
2
|
|
Access from Fisherman’s Hollow to upper lookout area (stairs) |
245,000 |
3
|
|
Remove and rehabilitate access around existing surf club to beach |
62,000 |
3
|
|
Access to Yanchep Beach Road from Capricorn Esplanade |
521,377 |
To be completed as part of road project at later date |
The cost estimates identified above include contingencies, design and project management costs.
Currently there is no allowance made within the existing Capital Works Budget for the implementation of the Master Plan outcomes. It is Administration’s intention to list the individual projects identified within the Master Plan as separate items for consideration in the City’s 20 Year Capital Works Budget.
Gant funding is available for projects of this nature and it is envisaged that applications would be made for each stage through Lotterywest and the Department of Sport and Recreation, where applicable.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the Yanchep Trails and Pathways Masterplan, as shown in Attachment 3, as the guiding document for future development of trails, pathways and associated development within the Yanchep Lagoon precinct;
2. NOTES that Administration will list the individual projects identified within the Yanchep Trails and Pathways Master Plan for consideration within the City’s 20 Year Capital Works Budget, based on the priorities identified within the report; and
3. RECOGNISES and THANKS the community for its involvement in the community consultation process.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Yanchep Lagoon Pathways and Trails Masterplan - Concept for Consultation |
16/103381 |
|
|
2. |
Yanchep Lagoon Trails Community Consultation Feedback - Summary |
16/67515 |
|
|
3. |
Revised Concept - Yanchep Lagoon Trails and Pathways Masterplan |
16/108302 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Cost Estimate (revised) - Yanchep Lagoon Trails and Pathways Masterplan |
16/103387 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 280
File Ref: 1569 – 16/154157
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the early delivery of the central concrete cricket wicket re-location at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex AFL ground to facilitate a proposed Western Australian Football League game at the venue.
Background
The Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Australian Rules Football (AFL) ground is located at 100 Kingsway, Madeley. (Attachment 1) and is classified as Regional Active Open Space. The property type is Crown Land, vested within the City of Wanneroo for the purposes of Recreation.
The AFL ground is located on the corner of Sporting and Spectator Drives (Attachment 1) and currently accommodates junior and senior AFL, cricket, Little Athletics and some small ball sports training and match play (day light hours only). The oval has also been used extensively for various City of Wanneroo community events.
Existing infrastructure on the ground includes the central concrete cricket wicket, cricket practice wickets, four pole floodlighting installation for large ball sport ball and physical training, throwing circles (used by Little Athletics), car park, storage sheds, car park and the Kingsway Football and Sporting Club.
The existing central cricket wicket is currently located as per (Attachment 2). While the wicket is fit for purpose, there have been preliminary discussions with the cricket club in respect to re-locating the wicket to bring it further to the east (Attachment 2), to improve the orientation of the wicket (and therefore the cricket ground) with the existing clubrooms. The re-location of the wicket is not currently listed in the draft 20 Year Capital Works Budget, however it is envisaged that Administration would be seeking to do so as a part of the next review of the draft 20 Year Capital Works budget.
An Event Approval has been submitted by the Subiaco Football Club to hold a Western Australian Football League (WAFL) fixture between Subiaco and West Perth at the ground on Saturday 6 August 2016. The game is being relocated from Medibank Stadium and in doing so, the Subiaco Football Club is seeking to develop the day into a family/community focused event, the centrepiece of which would be the WAFL fixture.
Detail
An Event Approval for the proposed event has been submitted by the Subiaco Football Club and is being processed by Administration.
In reviewing the requirements of the proposed game, it has been determined that the existing central concrete cricket wicket, in its current configuration, will prevent the proposed game from being able to be held at the ground. This is on the basis that the WAFL’s standards which indicate that:
“Artificial wickets will be covered with turf so that a flat, even and solid surface is produced. The new turf must be fixed and allow no greater movement than the surrounding surface.
Where this cannot be achieved the artificial surface must
1. Artificial wicket must be removed
2. Not be covered with rubber matting as this may shift during play.”
The current wicket has been constructed in such a way that the top of the wicket is at ground level. As result, when the wicket is turfed over (which would occur using jumbo turf rolls 50mm thick) there would be a mound effect created, which would pose an unacceptable risk to players. Generally, concrete cricket wickets such as these are installed at 30mm below ground level to allow for such turfing.
Hence, to enable the game to progress this report will recommend that the proposed re-location of the existing wicket to better suit the needs of the resident cricket club, be brought forward to enable the ground to accommodate WAFL fixtures as that proposed by the Subiaco Football Club on 6 August 2016. This is on the basis that the eventual replacement of this wicket would take into consideration an improved orientation and be completed to the required specification (i.e installed 30mm below ground level).
A summary of the proposed works, timing (relevant to the proposed WAFL fixture) and budget has been outlined in the table below.
|
Description of works |
Timing |
|
· Removal of the existing wicket (synthetic turf and concrete pad) · Installing new soil and turf |
As soon as practically possible. Works to commence on a Monday in order for the oval to be ready for play the following Saturday for normal winter season fixtures at this ground. Cost estimate = $5,000. |
|
· Installation of new concrete pad and synthetic turf |
Week after the end of the football season. Estimated construction time two weeks (allows for concrete curing time prior to synthetic carpet installation). Works to be completed in the maintenance window between winter and summer sports. Cost estimate = $30,000. |
|
Estimated cost |
$35,000 |
It is Administration’s intention that the removal of the wicket will occur in the current financial year, funded through existing operating budget, with re-location and installation of new to occur in the 2016/17 financial year (late September, early October 2016).
Administration is currently consulting with the resident clubs to ascertain the most appropriate positioning of the re-located cricket wicket. In addition to this, Administration is also working with the resident clubs to arrange alternative training and competition venues in the period leading up to the game. These discussions are being based on the following:
· 2 weeks prior – games moved and target of no training;
· 4 weeks to 2 weeks prior – no training and weekend matches only;
These targets have been put in place to assist Administration in undertaking the additional ground maintenance required (that is outside of normal practice) to improve the quality of the playing surface and to limit the impact of wear and tear on the ground. The proposed ground preparation for the event includes the following:
· Additional mowing – to be mown twice weekly for last three weeks prior to the match;
· Additional nutrient application to promote strong grass growth to create a quality surface and increase aesthetic appearance;
· Compaction testing – twice in month prior to game to ensure the surface is not too hard or soft (simple test by the City's Turf Consultant); and
· General mulching to Kingsway surrounds and Clubroom surrounds.
It is estimated that the cost of these works will be under $6000 and will be met through existing operating budgets.
Consultation
As noted above, consultation with the resident clubs at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex AFL ground are currently underway in respect to the use of the ground in the lead up to the proposed event and in the proposed re-location of the existing cricket wicket.
There has also been communication between Administration and the Subiaco Football Club in respect to the proposed WAFL match and a meeting with the Chief Executive Officer of the Subiaco Football Club, the Mayor and Administration was held in respect to the proposal on 9 February 2016.
Comment
While Administration has been supportive of the proposed WAFL fixture at the ground, there has been some concern in respect to the cost of the cricket wicket re-location, as a one-off cost directly related to the hosting of the WAFL fixture. However, in considering this in the context of the apparent need to re-orientate the existing cricket wicket to better serve the resident clubs, and the potential to secure a WAFL fixture at the ground on a more regular basis (annual or bi-annual), the cost of the cricket wicket re-location are somewhat more justifiable. As a result, this report will recommend that the City consider entering into an agreement with the Subiaco Football Club to secure WAFL fixtures at this ground on a more regular basis over the next five year period.
However, it is important to recognise that there will be costs associated with the hosting of WAFL games at this venue, beyond those associated with the re-location of the cricket wicket. These relate primarily to the additional ground maintenance required. In addition, it should be noted that hosting of these fixtures at the ground will also impact on the resident clubs and their ability to use the ground in the lead up to the game.
In addition to this, it should be noted that the hosting of this game will impact the availability of the ground to the resident clubs and also impact those clubs who use the grounds to which the Kingsway games have been re-located.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Due consideration has been given to the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.3 Public Open Space Policy and Facility Hire and Use Policy in the consideration of this issue.
Financial Implications
As noted previously in this report, the cost of removal of the existing cricket wicket will occur in the current financial year and will be funded from existing operating budget (estimated at $5,000). The cost of installing the new cricket wicket (in the proposed new location) will be funded through the 2016/17 capital works budget, at an estimated cost of $30,000.
The cost of the increased ground maintenance for the game is estimated to be less than $6,000 and will be covered through existing operating budgets.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the proposal from the Subiaco Football Club to hold a Western Australian Football League fixture at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex AFL ground on Saturday 6 August 2016;
2. NOTES that the existing cricket wicket has been identified as an impediment to the successful hosting of this fixture based on health and safety grounds;
3. NOTES that the removal of the existing central cricket wicket will be funded from the 2015/16 operating budget, with the installation of the new central cricket wicket to be funded from the 2016/17 Capital Works Budget;
4. NOTES that Administration will seek agreement with the Subiaco Football Club and the Western Australian Football League to host WAFL fixtures at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex AFL ground on a minimum of a bi-annual basis over the next 5 years;
5. NOTES that the removal of the existing central concrete cricket wicket will occur prior to the proposed Western Australian Football League fixture on 6 August 2016 and re-location to occur prior to the commencement of the 2016/17 summer season, with the location of the new wicket to be confirmed with resident clubs prior to the works being undertaken; and
6. AUTHORISES the Director Community and Place to inform the Chief Executive Officer of the Subiaco Football Club of the above outcomes.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - AFL Ground Location Plan |
16/157059 |
|
|
2. |
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - AFL Ground - Cricket Wicket Relocation Plan |
16/157083 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 286
Place Strengthening
File Ref: 19964 – 16/5285
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider amendments to the City's Community Funding Policy as part of a scheduled review.
Background
This policy guides delivery of the City’s Community Funding Program, the responsibility for which was transferred to the Community Links team in October 2014. The Community Links sub-unit (renamed Connected and Resilient Communities as part of the recent structural realignment project) sits in the new Place Strengthening Service Unit in the Community & Place Directorate.
The Community Funding Program provides an opportunity for the City to financially support community organisations and groups to deliver community development projects and community-based events. These community-driven initiatives benefit local communities as well as the wider City of Wanneroo community by developing a sense of place and identity. Through the Community Funding Program, the City also contributes towards building the capacity of community groups to become strong community assets that can deliver for and with community.
This report recommends the proposed Community Funding Policy review changes to provide for an accountable, clear and transparent Community Funding Program for the City of Wanneroo.
Detail
Administration has reviewed the Community Funding Policy (Attachment 1) and recommends only minor amendments to the policy comprising:
1. Changes to relevant references to reflect the new Place Strengthening Service Unit and Community & Place Directorate.
2. Insertion of a summary table of community funding categories at the beginning of the policy for ease of reference.
3. Updates to terminology and grammar to improve clarity and consistency.
4. Changes to the City’s wards to reflect the new three-ward structure: This particularly impacts upon Category C and Category D of the Community Funding Program.
The next review of the Community Funding Policy is scheduled for December 2016. This early revision date has been set with a view to introducing further policy changes to align with new place strengthening practices and frameworks which will be implemented during 2016.
Consultation
All relevant stakeholders were consulted as a part of the policy review. As this review is a minor administrative review, only internal stakeholders in the Place Strengthening Service Unit, Governance and Legal Service Unit, and the Community & Place Directorate have been consulted.
Elected Member and community consultation opportunities will be offered as a part of the major Community Funding Policy Review scheduled for December 2016.
Comment
Implementation of the policy amendments will improve understanding of the City’s Community Funding Program. The introduction of a summary table at the beginning of the policy assists in providing program category clarity but also assists in demonstrating a clearer distinction between the Community Funding Program, the City’s Donations and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy and the City’s Sponsorship Policy.
Statutory Compliance
Section 2.7 of the Local Government Act defines the role of Council and under clause (2)(b) states determines the local government’s policies.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
2.2 Healthy and Active People – We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.
2.3 Safe Communities – We feel at home in our local area.
4 Civic Leadership – Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working with Others – The Community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ADOPTS the Proposed Revised Community Funding Policy as shown in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Draft Community Funding Policy |
16/9203 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 302
File Ref: 19964 – 16/120099
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider applications from community groups requesting funding through the City's Community Funding Program March 2016 round for specified projects, activities or events.
Background
The Community Funding Program currently offers two funding rounds per year, one in March and one in October. The March 2016 funding round represents the second round for the 2015/2016 financial year.
The Community Funding Working Group met on Tuesday 12 April 2016 to discuss and make recommendations for the Community Funding Program March 2016 round as follows:
“1. APPROVES $1,500.00 to the Black Swan State Theatre Company via Community Development Funding for the production of Shadowboxing on 16 August 2016 with encouragement for the Black Swan State Theatre Company to work with a City of Wanneroo Place Development Facilitator to identify alternate funding opportunities and develop project sustainability for further delivery within the City of Wanneroo;
2. APPROVES $3,000.00 to the Wanneroo Junior Motocross Club via Community Event Funding for the Motocross Come and Try Day on a day between 12 February 2017 and 27 March 2017 SUBJECT to provision of a satisfactory Risk Management Plan endorsed by the Motocross Club Peak Body due to the high-risk nature of the activity;
3. APPROVES $1,540.00 to the Brighton Community Garden via Community Development Funding for a Gardening Workshop Facilitator $1,200.00, herb seeds and seedlings $95.00, morning tea $96, advertising $50.00 and fertilisers and pest control $99 for the Learn, Grow and Heal: Build Community Medicinal Herb Garden Project from 6 August 2016 to 26 November 2016;
4. APPROVES $3,000.00 to the Quinns Rocks Primary School P & C Inc via Community Development Funding for the Living Laboratory Community Garden Project from 15 July 2016 to 2 January 2017 SUBJECT to receipt of further documentation to support Incorporation status received by 3 June 2016 and renewed Certificate of Public Liability Insurance;
5. APPROVES $1,239.22 to the Northern Suburbs Stroke Support Group via Community Development Funding for the Have a Go Challenge on 19 July 2016;
6. APPROVES $1,645.00 to the Yanchep Two Rocks Community Recreation Association via Community Event Funding for the Sunset Markets on 5 November 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of satisfactory budget to support cost-neutral event delivery by 3 June 2016 and with the expectation that the Yanchep Two Rocks Community Recreation Association will work with the City of Wanneroo Place Development Facilitator to identify other suitable funding options and approaches to event sustainability;
7. APPROVES $1,186.35 to the One Big Voice Festival Inc via Community Event Funding for the One Big Voice Festival 2016 on 12 August 2016 SUBJECT to provision of satisfactory quote for 2016 event-specific Public Liability Insurance, two satisfactory current letters of support from participating City of Wanneroo schools and satisfactory evidence of participating City of Wanneroo Schools at the 2015 event by 3 June 2016. Approval is recommended with an expectation that One Big Voice Festival Inc will in future pursue alternate City of Wanneroo or other suitable funding options with a view to developing further event sustainability;
8. APPROVES $3,180.00 to the Heart and Lung Transplant Foundation of Western Australian Inc (Auspicing Jindalee Oz Day Working Group) via Community Event Funding for the Australia Day Family Event for the Community on 26 January 2017;
9. DOES NOT APPROVE $3,000.00 to i60 Community Services via Community Event Funding due to duplication of application No. 8;
10. APPROVES $1,000.00 to The Salvation Army via Community Event Funding for Community Christmas Carols on 9 December 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of satisfactory documentation to support organisation eligibility by 3 June 2016; and
11. APPROVES $4,000.00 to One Church Perth Inc via Community Event Funding for the Wanneroo Christmas Lunch 2016 on 25 December 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of all supporting documentation and confirmation of venue and bin hire by 3 June 2016 and renewed Certificate of Public Liability Insurance.”
Detail
Eleven applications with the following ward distribution were received by the 29 March 2016 closing date.
|
Ward |
Projects |
Events |
TOTAL |
|
South |
1 |
|
1 |
|
Central |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
North Coast |
3 |
4 |
7 |
|
All Wards |
|
1 |
1 |
|
TOTAL |
5 |
6 |
11 |
A summary of each application together with Administration recommendations is provided (Attachment 1).
Consultation
The City’s Community & Place Directorate teams were provided with information about the March 2016 round of funding. Teams were encouraged to give early consideration to eligible community groups of interest and community project and event ideas and distribute community funding information to community groups as well as through their networks.
The team approach also comprised of a newly-introduced first step in the community funding process whereby all potential applicants were required to make contact with their Ward-based Place Development Facilitator. This step ensured that potential applicants were offered an opportunity to discuss and shape their project or event idea with a Connected and Resilient Communities team member whose knowledge of and interest in community-led activities could be beneficial during the development and planning phase. The Ward-based Place Development Facilitator could also link together groups and organisations with a similar local interest for potential partnerships and therefore develop a stronger project or activity.
With a connection to the Ward-based Place Development Facilitator, potential applicants whose project or activity ideas did not satisfactorily meet community funding eligibility criteria, were then also best-placed to receive information about other City and non-City funding opportunities and resources.
Comment
Promotion of the Community Funding Program March 2016 round was achieved through the following:
· Wanneroo Link;
· What’s Happening;
· Email notification to Community & Place databases and network groups;
· City of Wanneroo website and Facebook page;
· NABO;
· Brochures and flyers displayed at the Wanneroo Library Cultural Centre and across the City’s libraries and community centres; and
· City of Wanneroo Clipboard and Diary.
A total of 23 community funding enquiries were received, resulting in eleven submitted applications. One application was received without prior contact with a Ward-based Place Development Facilitator or the Community Funding Officer. A register of enquiries was compiled to capture the scope of ward-specific projects, events and outcomes. Place Development Facilitators will use this as a reference document for identifying community group support required for future community funding opportunities.
The Community Funding Officer provided one-to-one assistance with the completion of the on-line application process upon request by applicant groups.
There was also strong evidence in the March 2016 community funding round that community groups continue to face challenges outlined below. Place Development Facilitators and the Community Funding Officer addressed these by providing expertise and guidance to potential applicants as required. However, the recurring nature of these challenges indicates a coordinated approach to City of Wanneroo community group capacity building is required. Therefore, learning site initiatives, leadership forums, information workshops, one-to-one meetings and community group peer-support meetings are currently being explored for delivery in 2016/17 as a part of the new Place Strengthening framework. The points below will also be considered as a part of the impending 2016/17 review of the City’s Community Funding Program and major review of the Community Funding Policy:
· Poor level of project and event (including budgetary) planning prior to seeking funding opportunities.
· Little knowledge of the suite of funding support programs offered by the City and by other funding bodies.
· Insufficient self-assessment regarding eligibility of their initiative for community funding and other funding opportunities.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
2.2 Healthy and Active People – We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.
2.3 Safe Communities – We feel at home in our local area.
4 Civic Leadership – Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working with Others – The Community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Administration has assessed the applications against the Community Funding Policy and provided recommendations for each application.
A minor review of the City’s Community Funding Policy was scheduled for December 2015 with an opportunity for discussion at Council Forum on 3 May 2016 prior to approval sought by Council at its May 2016 meeting. The focus of this review is to standardise terminology, improve clarity and incorporate administrative changes reflecting the new ward structure and change of service unit responsibility for program delivery. Fundamental changes to the Community Funding Policy are not proposed in this interim review.
A major policy review is scheduled for December 2016. This review will incorporate research and consultation for producing a more accessible community funding program framework which also aligns with key Place Strengthening Service Unit and Community & Place Directorate objectives.
The City of Wanneroo Community Funding Program Central Grants Register 2001 onwards is provided to Council for annual noting in accordance with Section 3.4 of the Community Funding Policy (Attachment 2).
Financial Implications
It is noted that a total amount of $30,304.22 was requested from eleven community funding applications. The average request for this funding round was $2,755.
Of the eleven community funding applications received, six were for community events totalling $17,325.00 (57% of the total community funding requested in the March 2016 round) and five applications were for community development projects totalling $12,979.22 (43% of the total community funding request in the March 2016 round).
The value of Administration recommendations in the March 2016 round of Community Funding for consideration by the working group is $21,290.57. This results in a variation to budget as an over-expenditure of $13,351.35 (16.7%). It is anticipated this deficit will be met within the Place Strengthening Service Unit budget (while balancing an overall positive bottom line position).
Identification of budget variation at the end of each financial year will bring increased clarity to actual financial year expenditure figures and also provide a basis for future budget increase requests.
The Community Funding Program March 2016 round is funded through the 2015/2016 adopted budget for Community Funding. The current GL account is 717253-1205-316.
|
Annual Community Funding Budget 2015/16
Less payments for March and October 2015 rounds, 2015 Community Christmas Celebration Category and 2016 Hallmark Event Category
Balance available for March 2016 round
Less value of Administration recommendations for Mar 2016 round
|
$80,000.00
$72,060.78
$7,939.22
$21,290.57 |
|
Variation to 2015/16 budget (over-expenditure 16.7%) |
($13,351.35) |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES $1,500.00 to the Black Swan State Theatre Company via Community Development Funding for the production of Shadowboxing on 16 August 2016 with encouragement for the Black Swan State Theatre Company to work with a City of Wanneroo Place Development Facilitator to identify alternate funding opportunities and develop project sustainability for further delivery within the City of Wanneroo;
2. APPROVES $3,000.00 to the Wanneroo Junior Motocross Club via Community Event Funding for the Motocross Come and Try Day on a day between 12 February 2017 and 27 March 2017 SUBJECT to provision of a satisfactory Risk Management Plan endorsed by the Motocross Club Peak Body due to the high-risk nature of the activity;
3. APPROVES $1,540.00 to the Brighton Community Garden via Community Development Funding for a Gardening Workshop Facilitator $1,200.00, herb seeds and seedlings $95.00, morning tea $96, advertising $50.00 and fertilisers and pest control $99 for the Learn, Grow and Heal: Build Community Medicinal Herb Garden Project from 6 August 2016 to 26 November 2016;
4. APPROVES $3,000.00 to the Quinns Rocks Primary School P & C Inc via Community Development Funding for the Living Laboratory Community Garden Project from 15 July 2016 to 2 January 2017 SUBJECT to receipt of further documentation to support Incorporation status received by 3 June 2016 and renewed Certificate of Public Liability Insurance;
5. APPROVES $1,239.22 to the Northern Suburbs Stroke Support Group via Community Development Funding for the Have a Go Challenge on 19 July 2016;
6. APPROVES $1,645.00 to the Yanchep Two Rocks Community Recreation Association via Community Event Funding for the Sunset Markets on 5 November 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of satisfactory budget to support cost-neutral event delivery by 3 June 2016 and with the expectation that the Yanchep Two Rocks Community Recreation Association will work with the City of Wanneroo Place Development Facilitator to identify other suitable funding options and approaches to event sustainability;
7. APPROVES $1,186.35 to the One Big Voice Festival Inc via Community Event Funding for the One Big Voice Festival 2016 on 12 August 2016 SUBJECT to provision of satisfactory quote for 2016 event-specific Public Liability Insurance, two satisfactory current letters of support from participating City of Wanneroo schools and satisfactory evidence of participating City of Wanneroo Schools at the 2015 event by 3 June 2016. Approval is recommended with an expectation that One Big Voice Festival Inc will in future pursue alternate City of Wanneroo or other suitable funding options with a view to developing further event sustainability;
8. APPROVES $3,180.00 to the Heart and Lung Transplant Foundation of Western Australian Inc (Auspicing Jindalee Oz Day Working Group) via Community Event Funding for the Australia Day Family Event for the Community on 26 January 2017;
9. DOES NOT APPROVE $3,000.00 to i60 Community Services via Community Event Funding due to duplication of application No. 8;
10. APPROVES $1,000.00 to The Salvation Army via Community Event Funding for Community Christmas Carols on 9 December 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of satisfactory documentation to support organisation eligibility by 3 June 2016; and
11. APPROVES $4,000.00 to One Church Perth Inc via Community Event Funding for the Wanneroo Christmas Lunch 2016 on 25 December 2016 SUBJECT to receipt of all supporting documentation and confirmation of venue and bin hire by 3 June 2016 and renewed Certificate of Public Liability Insurance.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Summary Report of Applications |
16/142404 |
|
|
2. |
Grant Register as at 6 April 2016 PDF |
16/112643 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 360
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 1859 – 16/144338
Responsible Officer: Manager Transactional Finance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of April 2016, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in April 2016:
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – April 2016 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
105741 - 106032 2525 - 2547 |
$1,325,933.03 $9,133,169.75 $10,459,102.78
($12,221.94) (642,491.64) ($193,686.01) $9,610,703.19 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – April 2016 Muni Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,610,703.19 $45,625.95 $3,479,027.89 $13,135,357.03 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – April 2016 Cell 4 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,250.00 $0.01 $184,436.00 $193,686.01 |
At the close of April 2016 outstanding creditors amounted to $705,704.71.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payments (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of April 2016 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Warrant of Payments Information Only |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Manager Transactional Finance |
Accept |
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of April 2016, as summarised below:-
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – April 2016 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
105741 - 106032 2525 - 2547 |
$1,325,933.03 $9,133,169.75 $10,459,102.78
($12,221.94) (642,491.64) ($193,686.01) $9,610,703.19 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – April 2016 Muni Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,610,703.19 $45,625.95 $3,479,027.89 $13,135,357.03 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – April 2016 Cell 4 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,250.00 $0.01 $184,436.00 $193,686.01 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS APRIL 2016 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00105741 |
05/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105742 |
05/04/2016 |
Building & Construction Industry Training Board |
$148,860.27 |
|
|
|
Collection Levy Payments 01 - 31.03.2016 - Finance |
|
|
00105743 |
05/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$317.95 |
|
00105744 |
05/04/2016 |
Quinns Rocks Returned To Services League Sub Branch Incorporated |
$8,800.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Delivery Of 2016 Hallmark Events Supported By The City Of Wanneroo Community Funding Program |
|
|
00105745 |
05/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Rugby U12 QLD Tour |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105746 |
05/04/2016 |
Yanchep to Lancelin Pastoral Area Church |
$10.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Facility Hire |
|
|
00105747 |
05/04/2016 |
Mehrdad Davachi |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105748 |
05/04/2016 |
Mitesh Patel |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105749 |
05/04/2016 |
Mohammad Ali Gholami |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105750 |
05/04/2016 |
Leonie Tham |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105751 |
05/04/2016 |
Kerry Davis |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105752 |
05/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$785.99 |
|
00105753 |
05/04/2016 |
H Shreeve & S Bush |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105754 |
05/04/2016 |
K Simcock |
$293.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105755 |
05/04/2016 |
MJ & AR Bamford Consulting Ecologists |
$1,001.68 |
|
|
|
Sale Of Artwork - 80% Of Sale Products During The Artful Gene Project Exhibition At Wanneroo Gallery From 18.11.2015 - 13.01.2016 |
|
|
00105756 |
05/04/2016 |
R Dusting |
$136.00 |
|
|
|
80% Of Sale Of Products During The Artwork Event - WLCC On 12.03.2016 |
|
|
00105757 |
05/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105758 |
05/04/2016 |
J Robert |
$62.40 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons |
|
|
00105759 |
05/04/2016 |
Justin Sonia Pty Ltd |
$184,436.00 |
|
|
|
Finalisation Of Contributions Arrangements - Cell 9 - Final Rate Adopted By Council - Balance Contingency To Be Returned - Planning & Sustainability |
|
|
00105760 |
05/04/2016 |
Eastern Hills Outdoor |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
|
00105761 |
05/04/2016 |
Thompson Sustainable Homes (WA) Pty |
$1,296.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees - Withdrawn |
|
|
00105762 |
05/04/2016 |
A Johns |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 3rd Prize |
|
|
00105763 |
05/04/2016 |
Sharon Leach |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 2nd Prize |
|
|
00105764 |
05/04/2016 |
Benn Tudor-Roberts |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 1st Prize |
|
|
00105765 |
05/04/2016 |
Leanne Scaddan |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 1st Prize |
|
|
00105766 |
05/04/2016 |
Teka Davis |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 2nd Prize |
|
|
00105767 |
05/04/2016 |
Johnathon Andrew Merkl |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 3rd Prize |
|
|
00105768 |
05/04/2016 |
Kelli Bannister |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 1st Prize |
|
|
00105769 |
05/04/2016 |
Trae Kennedy |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 1st Prize |
|
|
00105770 |
05/04/2016 |
Zavier Morey |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Competition 2016 1st Prize |
|
|
00105771 |
05/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$88.72 |
|
00105772 |
05/04/2016 |
Ridgewood Little Athletics Centre Incorporated |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105773 |
05/04/2016 |
Ridgewood Little Athletics Centre Incorporated |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105774 |
05/04/2016 |
Mindarie Mustangs Little Athletics |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105775 |
05/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$689.77 |
|
00105776 |
05/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$1,568.74 |
|
00105777 |
05/04/2016 |
Urban WA Real Estate |
$336.00 |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
|
00105778 |
05/04/2016 |
M Wilkinson |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105779 |
05/04/2016 |
C Long |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105780 |
05/04/2016 |
Dane Nikola & Sophea Hak |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105781 |
05/04/2016 |
W Shoukralla |
$237.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105782 |
05/04/2016 |
Butler FC |
$67.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Facility Hire |
|
|
00105783 |
05/04/2016 |
Landsdale Cricket Club Incorporated |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105784 |
05/04/2016 |
Danielle Riney |
$242.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Working With Children Renewal & First Aid Course |
|
|
00105785 |
05/04/2016 |
Tracc Civil Pty Ltd |
$1,035.99 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Building Application Fees - Duplicated |
|
|
00105786 |
05/04/2016 |
Alinta Gas |
$17.35 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
00105787 |
05/04/2016 |
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash |
$84.65 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105788 |
05/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$29.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105789 |
05/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105790 |
05/04/2016 |
Water Corporation |
$19,276.52 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
Repair And Replace Meter - Golders Way - Waste |
|
|
00105791 |
05/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105792 |
05/04/2016 |
Synergy |
$59,966.80 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance $400.00 |
|
|
00105793 |
05/04/2016 |
Telstra |
$1,467.41 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00105794 |
05/04/2016 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$83.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105795 |
05/04/2016 |
St Lawrence Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00105796 |
05/04/2016 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Room Two |
$251.60 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105797 |
05/04/2016 |
Mirrabooka Village Supa IGA |
$23.96 |
|
|
|
Food For Hainsworth Youth Centre |
|
|
00105798 |
05/04/2016 |
SAI Global Ltd |
$205.87 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - IT |
|
|
00105799 |
05/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$5,850.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Hazard Reduction Burn |
|
|
00105800 |
05/04/2016 |
Zoho Corporation Private Ltd |
$4,977.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - ManageEngine ADAudit Plus Professional Edition 27.03.2016 - 26.03.2017 - IT |
|
|
00105801 |
12/04/2016 |
Tyron Bartholomew |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Health Assessment Certificate Fee - Not Required |
|
|
00105802 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105803 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$292.69 |
|
00105804 |
12/04/2016 |
T Bissett |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2016 Art Award Entry Fee - Withdrawn |
|
|
00105805 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$519.19 |
|
00105806 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$854.59 |
|
00105807 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$3,979.06 |
|
00105808 |
12/04/2016 |
P Sukoski |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105809 |
12/04/2016 |
PC & LP Mizen |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105810 |
12/04/2016 |
J & NP Butt |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105811 |
12/04/2016 |
P & L O'Grady |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105812 |
12/04/2016 |
J Woolfitt |
$328.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105813 |
12/04/2016 |
M Church |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105814 |
12/04/2016 |
K Hockey |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program Gold Supa Golf & Lunch |
|
|
00105815 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$2,461.06 |
|
00105816 |
12/04/2016 |
Ruby Benjamin Animal Foundation Incorporated |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Donation Payment - Animal Sterilisations |
|
|
00105817 |
12/04/2016 |
Ben Trager Homes |
$998.20 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees |
|
|
00105818 |
12/04/2016 |
Homegroup WA |
$216.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees |
|
|
00105819 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105820 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105821 |
12/04/2016 |
Mohammad Mahmoudi |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105822 |
12/04/2016 |
Bari Community |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105823 |
12/04/2016 |
West Coast Cricket Club |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105824 |
12/04/2016 |
Making Mini Music |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105825 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105826 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105827 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$368.24 |
|
00105828 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$736.62 |
|
00105829 |
12/04/2016 |
J Gibson |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105830 |
12/04/2016 |
MH & ND Van Rensburg |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105831 |
12/04/2016 |
Fiona Leck |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105832 |
12/04/2016 |
M J Kingsbury |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105833 |
12/04/2016 |
K L Herbert |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00105834 |
12/04/2016 |
J E Connop |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105835 |
12/04/2016 |
Landsdale Junior Cricket Club Incorporated |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105836 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105837 |
12/04/2016 |
Colleen Dawn Alexander |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Part Payment - Regulatory Services |
|
|
00105838 |
12/04/2016 |
Tracy Thomas |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Heritage High Tea |
|
|
00105839 |
12/04/2016 |
Shaazia Jassat |
$191.52 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons |
|
|
00105840 |
12/04/2016 |
Dorothy Parin |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Outing - GOLD Programs |
|
|
00105841 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$93.84 |
|
00105842 |
12/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$1,100.00 |
|
00105843 |
12/04/2016 |
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105844 |
12/04/2016 |
H Everett |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105845 |
12/04/2016 |
St Anthony's School |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105846 |
12/04/2016 |
Synergy |
$507,036.50 |
|
|
|
Streetlighting 25.02.2016 - 24.03.2016 |
|
|
00105847 |
12/04/2016 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105848 |
12/04/2016 |
Alinta Gas |
$167.50 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $86.90 |
|
|
00105849 |
12/04/2016 |
Buckingham House Petty Cash |
$88.30 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105850 |
12/04/2016 |
Mr Stephen Freeborn |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
00105851 |
12/04/2016 |
Mr Evan Martin |
$274.00 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
00105852 |
12/04/2016 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$324.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105853 |
12/04/2016 |
Water Corporation |
$18,060.68 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
Water Meter - Rendell Way |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $2,936.02 |
|
|
00105854 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105855 |
12/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105856 |
12/04/2016 |
Synergy |
$109,241.66 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
7 X Financial Assistance $1,491.31 |
|
|
00105857 |
12/04/2016 |
Telstra |
$42.12 |
|
|
|
Mobile Enhanced SMS |
|
|
00105858 |
12/04/2016 |
Mrs Jennifer Martin |
$241.14 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
00105859 |
12/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$221.45 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105860 |
12/04/2016 |
Building & Health Petty Cash |
$157.25 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105861 |
12/04/2016 |
Ms Jodie Walter |
$109.60 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payments |
|
|
00105862 |
12/04/2016 |
Mr John Richards |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
00105863 |
12/04/2016 |
Hamersley Netball Club (Incorporated) |
$1,600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 8 Children |
|
|
00105864 |
12/04/2016 |
Mr Blaid Kendrick |
$519.20 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Working With Children Check & First Aid |
|
|
00105865 |
11/04/2016 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00105866 |
11/04/2016 |
Cr D M Newton |
$2,491.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00105867 |
12/04/2016 |
Creating Communities Australia Pty Ltd |
$10,992.96 |
|
|
|
Needs & Feasibility Study Facilities - Yanchep Community Centre |
|
|
00105868 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$241.38 |
|
00105869 |
19/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105870 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$856.77 |
|
00105871 |
19/04/2016 |
Judith Milliken |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105872 |
19/04/2016 |
Krishna Ramani & Manchal Sudhakar |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105873 |
19/04/2016 |
Quinns Rocks Junior Cricket Club |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105874 |
19/04/2016 |
Mishali Patani |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105875 |
19/04/2016 |
Samuel Crocomebe & Dayna Marsh |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105876 |
19/04/2016 |
Melissa Mosher |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105877 |
19/04/2016 |
Kylie O'Connor |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00105878 |
19/04/2016 |
Shirley Mullan |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105879 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$3,133.64 |
|
00105880 |
19/04/2016 |
Shane & Karen Wall |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105881 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$1,529.75 |
|
00105882 |
19/04/2016 |
Derek Simon |
$3.75 |
|
|
|
Refund - Boxing Cancelled - Youth Services Holiday Program |
|
|
00105883 |
19/04/2016 |
Denzil Talbot |
$7.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Boxing Cancelled - Youth Services Holiday Program |
|
|
00105884 |
19/04/2016 |
Joanne Beveridge |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105885 |
19/04/2016 |
Vince Filardo |
$50.68 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105886 |
19/04/2016 |
Angela Codd |
$21.25 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105887 |
19/04/2016 |
Meg Barmuta |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105888 |
19/04/2016 |
Ann Shreeve |
$21.25 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105889 |
19/04/2016 |
Needac Ltd |
$584.00 |
|
|
|
Payment Refund - Booking Cancelled |
|
|
00105890 |
19/04/2016 |
M & C Grove |
$620.64 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gym Membership - Aquamotion |
|
|
00105891 |
19/04/2016 |
H & K Aresti |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105892 |
19/04/2016 |
J Funnell |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105893 |
19/04/2016 |
J McDougall |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105894 |
19/04/2016 |
West Coast Shade |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees - Withdrawn |
|
|
00105895 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$528.37 |
|
00105896 |
19/04/2016 |
FM Selyer |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105897 |
19/04/2016 |
M Laing |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2016 Art Award Entry Fee - Artist Withdrawing Artwork |
|
|
00105898 |
19/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105899 |
19/04/2016 |
Insurance Commission Of Western Australia |
$295.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Double Payment Of Invoice 168576 - Finance |
|
|
00105900 |
19/04/2016 |
F D Greyvenstein |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105901 |
19/04/2016 |
J Mac Munn |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105902 |
19/04/2016 |
M J Susi |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105903 |
19/04/2016 |
Leonor Diaz |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105904 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$408.32 |
|
00105905 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$2,448.00 |
|
00105906 |
19/04/2016 |
West Coast Ice Hockey |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend Singapore Ice Dragons International Ice Hockey Classic In Singapore 07 - 13.03.2016 |
|
|
00105907 |
19/04/2016 |
Track Cycling WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - $200.00 To 1 X Member - Australian Junior Track Championships Launceston 24 - 27.02.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship - $200.00 To 1 X Member - Australian Senior Track Championships In Adelaide 03 - 06.02.2016 |
|
|
00105908 |
19/04/2016 |
School Sport Western Australia |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 2 X Members School Sport Australia Softball Championships In Melbourne 30.04.2016 - 07.05.2016 |
|
|
00105909 |
19/04/2016 |
Nam H Tran |
$1,775.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105910 |
19/04/2016 |
M Sobolewski |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105911 |
19/04/2016 |
School Sport Western Australia |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 2 X Members - Participation At The School Sport Australia Triathlon Championships - Hervey Bay 18 - 21.04.2016 |
|
|
00105912 |
19/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105913 |
19/04/2016 |
Clarkson Little Athletics Club |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 2 X Members - Participation At The Australian Junior Athletics Championships - Perth 08 - 13.03.2016 |
|
|
00105914 |
19/04/2016 |
Westside BMX Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member - Participation At The BMX National Championships - Bathurst 29.02.2016 - 06.03.2016 |
|
|
00105915 |
19/04/2016 |
Softball WA Incorporated |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend The 11th Junior Men's Softball World Championships In Midland Michigan USA 22 - 30.07.2016 |
|
|
00105916 |
19/04/2016 |
WA Academy Of Irish Dancing |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend The World Championship Of Irish Dancing In Glasgow Scotland 20 - 27.03.2016 |
|
|
00105917 |
19/04/2016 |
Arena Swim Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member At The 2016 Georgina Hope Foundation Australian Age Championships In Adelaide 28.03.2016 - 04.04.2016 |
|
|
00105918 |
19/04/2016 |
Breakers Swim Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member At The 2016 Georgina Hope Foundation Australian Age Championships In Adelaide 28.03.2016 - 04.04.2016 |
|
|
00105919 |
19/04/2016 |
L Landsdown |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105920 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$550.00 |
|
00105921 |
19/04/2016 |
Tracy Rowe |
$32.25 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Hire Fees |
|
|
00105922 |
19/04/2016 |
Jennifer Haughton |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105923 |
19/04/2016 |
Abdiaziz Ahmed |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Health Assessment Certificate Fee |
|
|
00105924 |
19/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$426.22 |
|
00105925 |
19/04/2016 |
Alinta Gas |
$662.85 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $167.80 |
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
00105926 |
19/04/2016 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$298.65 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105927 |
19/04/2016 |
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash |
$100.85 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105928 |
19/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105929 |
19/04/2016 |
Water Corporation |
$2,377.49 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $300.00 |
|
|
00105930 |
19/04/2016 |
Yanchep Community Centre Petty Cash |
$87.45 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105931 |
19/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105932 |
19/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105933 |
19/04/2016 |
Synergy |
$31,531.65 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $164.10 |
|
|
00105934 |
19/04/2016 |
Telstra |
$32,433.25 |
|
|
|
Internet/Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00105935 |
19/04/2016 |
Ms Maree Murray |
$136.80 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Driving Licence Medical F Extension & National Police Certificate |
|
|
00105936 |
19/04/2016 |
Girl Guides WA Incorporated |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 4 Children |
|
|
00105937 |
19/04/2016 |
Balga Soccer & Social Club |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 11 Children |
|
|
00105938 |
19/04/2016 |
Francis Jordan Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00105939 |
19/04/2016 |
Marmion Squash & Social Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
00105940 |
19/04/2016 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Room Two |
$215.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105941 |
19/04/2016 |
Miss Wendy Gaye Bloomfield |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Family History Training Session Yanchep/Two Rock - Library Services |
|
|
00105942 |
20/04/2016 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$758.95 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00105943 |
25/04/2016 |
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore |
$3,280.00 |
|
|
|
Sony Television - IT |
|
|
|
|
Apple IPad Mini 2 Wi-Fi 16gb - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
00105944 |
25/04/2016 |
SAI Global Ltd |
$504.64 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal/Royalties - Contracts And Procurement |
|
|
00105945 |
25/04/2016 |
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$1,127.50 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Vacuum & Batteries - Fire Services |
|
|
00105946 |
25/04/2016 |
DG Simmonds |
$3,322.99 |
|
|
|
Construction Of Brick Manhole - Koondoola Regional Bushland - Projects |
|
|
00105947 |
25/04/2016 |
Altronic Distributors |
$29.86 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00105948 |
25/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105949 |
25/04/2016 |
Stephen McKee |
$5,860.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Remove Asbestos - Various Locations - Waste/Projects |
|
|
00105950 |
25/04/2016 |
Active 4 Life |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Gold Program - Nordic Walking - Community Facilities |
|
|
00105951 |
25/04/2016 |
1800 Move It |
$396.00 |
|
|
|
Removal Services - City Growth |
|
|
00105952 |
25/04/2016 |
EVH Emergency Vet Hospital |
$595.20 |
|
|
|
Euthanasia X 2 Dogs - Rangers |
|
|
00105953 |
25/04/2016 |
Brewed Awakening Cafe |
$255.34 |
|
|
|
Coffee - Wanneroo Business Association - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
00105954 |
25/04/2016 |
Sue Sutherland Consulting |
$9,800.00 |
|
|
|
Strategy & Policy Development - March 2016 - Cultural Development |
|
|
00105955 |
26/04/2016 |
Lord Mayor's Distress Relief Fund |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Donation To The Lord Mayor's Distress Relief Fund Waroona And District Fires Appeal 2016 |
|
|
00105956 |
27/04/2016 |
Clare Burns |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105957 |
27/04/2016 |
Frances Haigh |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105958 |
27/04/2016 |
Rakesh Hirani |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105959 |
27/04/2016 |
Rachael Williams |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105960 |
27/04/2016 |
L P Callaghan |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105961 |
27/04/2016 |
Mina Gathani |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105962 |
27/04/2016 |
Chintankumar D Shah |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105963 |
27/04/2016 |
Andrew Grindley |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105964 |
27/04/2016 |
Seiko Grant |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105965 |
27/04/2016 |
Kit Tang-Bowman |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105966 |
27/04/2016 |
Morley Eagles Baseball Club (Eastern Phantoms) |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - Participation At The 2016 Australian Junior League Championship In Adelaide 22 - 26.05.2016 |
|
|
00105967 |
27/04/2016 |
Keady/Upton School of Irish Dancing |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 3 X Members - World Irish Dancing Championships In Glasgow, Scotland 20 - 27.03.2016 |
|
|
00105968 |
27/04/2016 |
Rugby WA Juniors |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship X 5 Children - 2016 Junior Gold Cup (U15's) Brisbane QLD - 06 - 13.03.2016 |
|
|
00105969 |
27/04/2016 |
Perth North Metro |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Donation - Little League State Team Fees, Uniforms, Equipment And Training - Championship, Matjelan Park Madeley WA 24.03.2016 |
|
|
00105970 |
27/04/2016 |
K Hrynkiw |
$51.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Overpayment Of HACC Account - Finance |
|
|
00105971 |
27/04/2016 |
Housing Authority |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00105972 |
27/04/2016 |
F2C All Stars |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend The NCA Allstar Championships Dallas Texas USA 14 - 24.03.2016 |
|
|
00105973 |
27/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$2,000.00 |
|
00105974 |
27/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$25.19 |
|
00105975 |
27/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00105976 |
27/04/2016 |
Risan Yakoub |
$485.50 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105977 |
27/04/2016 |
Carnival Nominees Pty Ltd |
$830.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105978 |
27/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$116.64 |
|
00105979 |
27/04/2016 |
Ulas & Bijal Makwana |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105980 |
27/04/2016 |
Pamela Fenton |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00105981 |
27/04/2016 |
Satterley Property Group |
$3,308.05 |
|
|
|
Refund - Portion Of Fees Not Expended Processing Amendment No.1 To The Jindalee North |
|
|
00105982 |
27/04/2016 |
Basketball WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend The Under 18 Australian Junior Championships In Adelaide 16 - 23.04.2016 |
|
|
00105983 |
27/04/2016 |
Mullaloo Surf Livesaving Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 1 X Member To Attend The Youth Australian Surf Lifesaving Championships In Maroochydore QLD 14 - 15.04.2016 |
|
|
00105984 |
27/04/2016 |
Ten Pin Bowling Association Of WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 2 X Members To Attend The National Disability Championships In Melbourne 08 - 18.06.2016 |
|
|
00105985 |
27/04/2016 |
Lisa Austin |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105986 |
27/04/2016 |
S & D Tilly |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105987 |
27/04/2016 |
R Katan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105988 |
27/04/2016 |
D & V Senghani |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105989 |
27/04/2016 |
A M Fotakis |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105990 |
27/04/2016 |
C Touw |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105991 |
27/04/2016 |
D & S Cooke |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Lifetime Rego Paid At Another Council |
|
|
00105992 |
27/04/2016 |
D J Swales |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00105993 |
27/04/2016 |
A J Metcalf |
$260.70 |
|
|
|
Refund - Term 2 2016 Swimming Lessons |
|
|
00105994 |
27/04/2016 |
Lisbeth Hurrelbrink |
$9.60 |
|
|
|
Sale Of Consignment Items - Museums |
|
|
00105995 |
27/04/2016 |
Zig Zag Road |
$24.00 |
|
|
|
Sale Of Consignment Items - Museums |
|
|
00105996 |
27/04/2016 |
Mantonics |
$11.20 |
|
|
|
Sale Of Consignment Items - Museums |
|
|
00105997 |
27/04/2016 |
Holy Life Pentecostal Church |
$102.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Hire Fees |
|
|
00105998 |
27/04/2016 |
Debra Levene |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00105999 |
27/04/2016 |
J & L Vines |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00106000 |
27/04/2016 |
G Tremble |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00106001 |
27/04/2016 |
Surf N Turf - Functional Fitness |
$234.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Hire Fees |
|
|
00106002 |
27/04/2016 |
Foundation Housing |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00106003 |
27/04/2016 |
Helping Minds |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00106004 |
27/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00106005 |
27/04/2016 |
Somaia Elmam |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00106006 |
27/04/2016 |
Margaret Quirk |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00106007 |
27/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$210.58 |
|
00106008 |
27/04/2016 |
Tracey Hill |
$21.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport Program |
|
|
00106009 |
27/04/2016 |
Nina Sollitt |
$21.12 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport Program |
|
|
00106010 |
27/04/2016 |
C P McGowan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00106011 |
27/04/2016 |
M Deacon |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Tennis |
|
|
00106012 |
27/04/2016 |
Tim Zaccaria |
$594.15 |
|
|
|
Refund - Cancellation Of Membership - Aquamotion |
|
|
00106013 |
27/04/2016 |
Keith Dudley Collisson |
$391.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Overpayment Of HACC Account - Finance |
|
|
00106014 |
27/04/2016 |
Rates Refund |
$410.48 |
|
00106015 |
27/04/2016 |
North Coast Rugby Union Junior Football Club |
$535.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00106016 |
27/04/2016 |
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash |
$246.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106017 |
27/04/2016 |
Buckingham House Petty Cash |
$92.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106018 |
27/04/2016 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$172.50 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106019 |
27/04/2016 |
Landgate |
$164.00 |
|
|
|
Transfer Of Land - Lots 65 And 66 Hartman Drive Wangara To State Of WA - Land & Leasing |
|
|
00106020 |
27/04/2016 |
Water Corporation |
$15,333.03 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $226.00 |
|
|
00106021 |
27/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00106022 |
27/04/2016 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00106023 |
27/04/2016 |
Synergy |
$23,450.00 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $148.30 |
|
|
00106024 |
27/04/2016 |
Telstra |
$1,467.89 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $84.48 |
|
|
00106025 |
27/04/2016 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$133.90 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106026 |
27/04/2016 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$447.95 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106027 |
27/04/2016 |
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash |
$256.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106028 |
27/04/2016 |
Healthy Communities Program Petty Cash |
$85.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00106029 |
27/04/2016 |
Ms Maree Murray |
$110.50 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Extension On Driving Licence - Funded Services |
|
|
00106030 |
27/04/2016 |
Balga Soccer & Social Club |
$1,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 6 Children |
|
|
00106031 |
27/04/2016 |
Mr John Di Candilo |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Extension On Driving Licence - Funded Services |
|
|
00106032 |
27/04/2016 |
Mrs Fiona Hodges |
$328.85 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Travel Expenses Incurred During Visit To Copenhagen Library |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$1,325,933.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00002525 |
04/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balga Job Link Incorporated |
$41,250.00 |
|
|
|
Assets - Office Equipment - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002526 |
05/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clicksuper Pty Ltd |
$644,002.14 |
|
|
|
Superannuation Deductions - Payroll |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002527 |
05/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alkimos Districts Cricket Club Incorporated |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$5,791.04 |
|
|
|
Billpay - March 2016 - Rates |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$67.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$364.26 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Travel Expenses January - March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$1,929.20 |
|
|
|
Monthly Mailroom Service Contract Fee March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Eagles Junior Basketball Club (Incorporated) |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,760.40 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Netball Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Lakers Basketball Club |
$510.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Lakers Hockey |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$5,059.42 |
|
|
|
Land Valuation 12.03.2016 - 25.03.2016 Rates |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Netball Club |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads WA |
$12,425.31 |
|
|
|
Reinstate Traffic Lights - Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Mr Kyle Standing |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Study Assistance - Bachelor Of Engineering (Civil) Honours |
|
|
|
|
Mr Steven Patten |
$2,192.00 |
|
|
|
Study Assistance - Bachelor Of Building Surveying & Certification |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janine Arias |
$61.80 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - National Police Clearance |
|
|
|
|
North Coast Rangers Christian Football Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rock Bush Fire Brigade |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Maintenance Of Yards At Quinns Rocks Volunteer Fire Station |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$2,088.92 |
|
|
|
GST Inputs Claimed To Be Credited To Employees Accounts For March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Titans Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$913.12 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Netball Club Incorporated |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002528 |
05/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Group |
$6,264.19 |
|
|
|
Install Terracotta Tactiles - Greyhound Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Sullivan Hamilton |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks Fitness Instructor - March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Plastic Card Company Pty |
$1,123.10 |
|
|
|
Library Membership Cards X 15,000 - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$2,186.80 |
|
|
|
Fencing Hire - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$2,765.85 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$18,856.65 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Clifton Perth |
$23,246.96 |
|
|
|
12 X Outdoor Cinema Screenings - Live In The Amphitheatre 2016 - Events |
|
|
|
|
Couplers Malaga |
$368.21 |
|
|
|
Labour - Steel Pipe Threading - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Couplings & Fitting For Water Pipe - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Crown Lift Trucks |
$341.22 |
|
|
|
Labour & Environmental Charge - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,871.00 |
|
|
|
2 X Dell Computer And Power Adapter - IT |
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$2,347.95 |
|
|
|
Printing - Banners & Teardrop Flags - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Folding Corflute Display Sign - Events |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$19,657.66 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services |
$1,213.30 |
|
|
|
Locate Services - Marmion Avenue & Yanchep Beach Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Executive Pty Ltd |
$2,370.23 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$11,626.59 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$1,555.98 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$38,391.49 |
|
|
|
Maintenance Work - November 2015 - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia |
$1,085.00 |
|
|
|
Training - LGMA Finance - Healthy Communities |
|
|
|
|
Training - CCTC For Critical Infrastructure & Local Government - 04 - 05.04.2016 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$3,334.19 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$186,203.85 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$60,631.91 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd |
$16,734.30 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Connolly Drive Dual Carriageway - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle People |
$258.58 |
|
|
|
Hospitality Staff - Communication And Events |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$12,408.14 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$7,452.50 |
|
|
|
Repair To Fencing - Shorehaven Mindarie - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Safetyquip |
$213.43 |
|
|
|
Gloves Nitrile Disposable - IT |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$577.50 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Playground - Foundation Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$50.60 |
|
|
|
Security Shredding For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$3,289.00 |
|
|
|
Lay Synthetic Turf - Richard Aldersea Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$2,527.20 |
|
|
|
First Aid Training - 15 X Engineering Staff 15 - 16.03.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Star Training & Assessing |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Training - 6 X Plant Operator Training - Waste |
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara |
$423.50 |
|
|
|
Dingo And Orga Hire - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Perth Mint |
$2,196.21 |
|
|
|
2016 Australian Citizenship Coin - Community And Place |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$4,840.55 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$222.64 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$141.59 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Newspapers - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Westate Timber Floors |
$2,202.20 |
|
|
|
Refurbish Timber Floor - Carramar Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$22,612.79 |
|
|
|
Removal Of Greenwaste February 2016 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
William Buck (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Misconduct Framework Review February 2016 - Legal |
|
|
|
|
Yelakitj Moort Nyungar Association Incorporated |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Welcome To Country 14.06.2016 At The Opening Of A Year In The Making Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002529 |
05/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Budo Group Pty Ltd |
$54,604.30 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 1 - Girrawheen Library Compliance Audit Rectification Works - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical P Ltd |
$72,787.67 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 8 - Community Centres Swipe Card Security & Fire Detection Systems - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002530 |
08/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Caltex Energy |
$786.60 |
|
|
|
Fuel Charges - March 2016 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002531 |
12/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Super |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Superannuation Contribution |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$278.33 |
|
|
|
Rates Assessment From Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise |
$2,398.95 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,380.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lara Simpkins |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Sabine Winton |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Samantha Jane Fenn |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$11,158.33 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00002532 |
12/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$123,627.38 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002533 |
12/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
MKDC |
$55,770.00 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 8 - Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002534 |
12/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
AHRI - Australian Human Resources Institute |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Investigating Workplace Misconduct - 05.04.2016 - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Auscontact Association Limited |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Training - WA Contact Centre Fundamentals - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$790.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Yellow Belt Six Sigma - 02.05.2016 - 03.05.2016 - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Traffic Planning and Management Incorporated |
$662.85 |
|
|
|
Renewal - Corporate Membership 2016 / 2017 - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Bank of I.D.E.A.S. |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Master Class In ABCD 17.08.2015 - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$731.52 |
|
|
|
Oxygen Medical Size - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop Pty Ltd |
$168.40 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$18.95 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchase - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$594.66 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$1,311.24 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$38,470.73 |
|
|
|
Recyclables - February 2016 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$1,959.94 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilets - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
DM Drilling Metro Pty Ltd |
$3,663.00 |
|
|
|
Conduit - Madeley Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
DVG Wanneroo Mitsubishi |
$40,332.50 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Isuzu Ute - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Echelon Australia Pty Ltd |
$18,150.00 |
|
|
|
Metro Strategic OSH Contract |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$528.76 |
|
|
|
Magazines - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Globe Australia |
$1,249.60 |
|
|
|
Fertiliser - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$83.76 |
|
|
|
Newspapers - CEO's Office |
|
|
|
|
Hender Lee Electrical Contractors P Ltd |
$2,523.25 |
|
|
|
Release Of Retention - St Andrews Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$1,959.10 |
|
|
|
Pump Test - Richard Aldersea - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Watermeter - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$16,114.93 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$4,504.75 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$3,106.53 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$53.84 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$135.09 |
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Lift Off Program - Place Strengthening |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$14,852.49 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayne Publishing Pty Ltd |
$77.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Arbor Age - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$145,796.58 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,975.12 |
|
|
|
Fuel March - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Oasis Supa Golf |
$404.55 |
|
|
|
Gold Program - Supa Golf - 15.04.2016 - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$3,468.25 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$202.76 |
|
|
|
Folders For Art Collections - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
Logitech Wireless Presenter - Capability & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$119.63 |
|
|
|
Service Call - CCTV Trailer - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$7,914.36 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Quickgrow Garden Centre & Landscaping Supplies |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Landscape Supplies February 2016 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Redman Solutions Pty Ltd |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Trapeze Desktop Refresher End User Program - Land Development |
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd |
$94.05 |
|
|
|
Sea Containers - Kingsway Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Data Solutions |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
|
IM Support - Kofax - IT |
|
|
|
|
State Law Publisher |
$114.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Government Gazette - Rates |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$328,571.89 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Catalina Stage 15 Clarkson - Finance |
|
|
|
|
The J G Holland Trust |
$23,100.00 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment - Market Research Report - Property |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Resuscitation - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$6,212.80 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$48,675.00 |
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - February 2016 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA |
$73.25 |
|
|
|
Workshop BBQ - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$105.60 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Newspaper - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Institute of Training |
$10,200.00 |
|
|
|
Mental Health Workshops X 42 - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd |
$103.52 |
|
|
|
Fuel - March 2016 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$130.50 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$587.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002535 |
12/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18th WA Wanneroo Boys Brigade |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Andy Heerkens |
$260.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Aqua Attack Swim Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Ashdale Netball Club Incorporated |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$295.20 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$879.20 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$580,040.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Building Commission |
$129,080.37 |
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payments 01 - 31.03.2016 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$635.04 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$5,718.22 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$826.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
College Park Gymnastic Academy |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Currambine Netball Club (Incorporated) |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Genesis Netball Club |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$950.15 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
IPAA WA |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Training - 2016 State Budget Briefing Personal Member - 31.05.2016 - Community Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Netball Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$161.82 |
|
|
|
Overpayment - Property Claim Reimbursement - Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,091.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$1,129.81 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Miss Nancy Kuntinsch |
$110.50 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Class Endorsement For Licence - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Moore River Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Mr Douglas Valeriani |
$54.80 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Graham John Woodard |
$164.40 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Gregory Johnson |
$257.57 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Joe Arrigo |
$120.57 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr John Baker |
$82.20 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Luke Jenkins |
$260.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Registered Exercise Professional 2 Year Accreditation |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty |
$213.74 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Kim Forrestal |
$82.20 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington |
$230.17 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Ms Peggy Brown |
$137.00 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
North Coast Rangers Christian Football Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Riding for the Disabled Association |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$14,688.81 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Sorrento Saints Netball Club Incorporated |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Basketball Association (Incorporated) |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Districts Jnr Rugby Union Football Club |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 7 Children |
|
|
|
|
West Coasters Netball Club Kingsway (Incorporated) |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep United Football Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002536 |
13/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$92,742.42 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Connolly Drive Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002537 |
13/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pindan Pty Ltd |
$486,844.04 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 6 - Pearsall Hocking Community Centre - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002538 |
15/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Harbour Agency Pty Ltd |
$30,250.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainment - Global Beats & Eats 2016 - 09.04.2016 - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002539 |
19/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$27,402.55 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$718.80 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund - Cheque Cancelled Paid Back Into Rates Account |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken |
$170.87 |
|
|
|
Travel Reimbursement - March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Currambine Netball Club (Incorporated) |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$1,299.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Searches March 2016 - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Everlast Flames Netball Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$499.80 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Genesis Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup & District Rugby League Club Incorporated |
$2,790.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 17 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Kinross Jnr Football Club |
$2,165.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 14 Children |
|
|
|
|
Kalari Taekwondo Australia Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$32,883.18 |
|
|
|
Unimproved Valuations Chargeable 01 - 29.03.2016 - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations Chargeable 26.03.2016 - 08.04.2016 - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Netball Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Mr Codie Safe |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Study Assistance - Cadet Engineering Program |
|
|
|
|
Mr Graeme Beaton |
$958.61 |
|
|
|
Study Assistance - Diploma Of Horticulture |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette O'Halloran |
$157.86 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Catering Items For The Employee Engagement Survey |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janine Arias |
$110.50 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Class Extension Required By Work |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Susan Pickard |
$196.90 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Application Fees For Passenger Endorsement |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Police Clearance |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Traffic Infringement Record |
|
|
|
|
Nga Iwi Katoa Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
North Coast Ball Club Incorporated |
$128.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
North Coast Rangers Christian Football Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
North Coast Rugby Union Football Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Padbury Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Districts Calisthenics Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Riding for the Disabled Association |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Saints Netball Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Sorrento Surf Lifesaving Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Stirling Lions Soccer Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
The Marist Football Club Incorporated |
$370.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$3,477.82 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Tuart Hill Junior Soccer Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Venetians Netball Club Incorporated |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Warwick Greenwood Junior Football Club |
$1,050.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 6 Children |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Netball Club Incorporated |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep United Football Club Incorporated |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Excess Payment - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002540 |
19/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Armando Sports Direct |
$143.55 |
|
|
|
Indoor Soccer Goals - Hainsworth Youth Centre |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$46.78 |
|
|
|
Industrial Nitrogen & Oxygen - Fleet & Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$25.01 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec Australasia Pty Ltd |
$3,667.40 |
|
|
|
Workstation Layout Changes - Wanneroo Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Remodelling Of Traffic Management Desk - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CBD College Pty Ltd |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Provide First Aid Course 11.04.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$11,416.93 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
City of Swan |
$60,500.00 |
|
|
|
2014 / 2015 Black Spot Project - Traffic Control Signs At Alexander Drive |
|
|
|
|
Cleartech Waste Management Pty Ltd |
$929.50 |
|
|
|
Dispose Of Fuel Drums - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$501.46 |
|
|
|
Portable Building Shell - Kingsway - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$133.20 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Police Check - Funded Services & Library |
|
|
|
|
Digital Mapping Solutions - Perth |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Intramaps Administrator & Mapmanager - 02 - 04.03.2016 - Business Systems |
|
|
|
|
Dimension Data Learning Solutions |
$3,960.55 |
|
|
|
Training - Microsoft 20697-2 Deploying & Managing Windows 10 Using Enterprise Services - IT |
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Fire Warden Training & Evacuation Drills - Various Dates - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$709.96 |
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Library |
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services |
$310.75 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Brolo Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$6,957.50 |
|
|
|
Extract Dead Grass Trees & Install New Ones Alnwick Turn & Flagstaff Roundabout - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$8,632.96 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$8,224.97 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services |
$559.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Basic Worksite Traffic Management & Traffic Control - Transport & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$4,159.24 |
|
|
|
Advertising For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mercy Community Services Incorporated |
$380.22 |
|
|
|
Partnership Agreement Payment For Food & Catering For The 1 A Boxing Program - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$199.57 |
|
|
|
Steel Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$195,517.38 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Move It |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Removal Services - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$121.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Nufab Industries Pty Ltd |
$2,018.50 |
|
|
|
Rebuild Mini Water Cannon - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$1,243.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$15,026.45 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$5,215.81 |
|
|
|
Filter Cartridge - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$1,988.69 |
|
|
|
Lift Service - 4 X Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Tennant Company |
$1,313.83 |
|
|
|
Filters - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Training - First Aid Course - 11.04.2016 - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Total Print |
$14,190.00 |
|
|
|
Wayfinding Signs And Bike Parking Signs - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$2.95 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$2,425.50 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
University of Western Australia |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$601.13 |
|
|
|
Traffic Management - Joondalup Drive - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$2,303.53 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$96.88 |
|
|
|
Medal Engraving Replacement - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Australia Day Award Replacement - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Westate Timber Floors |
$9,607.40 |
|
|
|
Timber Floor Refurbishment - Phil Renkin Recreation Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$261.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Boot - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$168.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Card - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002541 |
19/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$9,900.00 |
|
|
|
Pre-Payment - Easement Assessment & Clearance For Hardcastle Park Development Nature Play - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002542 |
22/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$394,372.98 |
|
|
|
Lenore Road Realignment & Upgrade Stage 2 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002543 |
22/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
A D Engineering International Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Scoreboard - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
AAC ID Solutions |
$800.50 |
|
|
|
Wristbands & Plate Re-Set - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Abrasive Trust |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Spot Blast & Spot Paint To Registered Trailer - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Access Office Industries |
$21,899.90 |
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Service Wheelchair Hoist - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Adform Engraving & Signs |
$44.00 |
|
|
|
Name Badge - S Bishop - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$4,469.85 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Yanchep National Park - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Window Tinting |
$176.00 |
|
|
|
Retint Rear Window - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
AECOM Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,473.70 |
|
|
|
Professional Fees - Neerabup Industrial Area - Property |
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Group |
$3,497.45 |
|
|
|
Install Tactiles - Pinjar Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Paving Works - Girrawheen Senior Citizens Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
AGM Automation North |
$682.00 |
|
|
|
Repair - North Gates - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Air & Power Pty Ltd |
$992.75 |
|
|
|
Repair Air Compressor - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd |
$309.47 |
|
|
|
Rental - Gas Cylinder - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia |
$660.60 |
|
|
|
Filters - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Alan Donelly Auctions |
$1,357.25 |
|
|
|
Items Bought at Antique Auction - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$545.00 |
|
|
|
Large Mixed Male Box Arrangement - G Schroder - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
|
Medium Anzac Wreath - Madeley Primary School - Office Of Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Small Anzac Wreath - Ashdale - Office Of Mayor |
|
|
|
|
60th Wedding Box Arrangement - P & V Ivey - Office Of Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Medium Anzac Wreath - Yanchep District High School - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
ALH Group Ltd (BWS) |
$432.00 |
|
|
|
4 Cases Wine - Human Resources |
|
|
|
|
Allerding & Associates |
$1,366.82 |
|
|
|
Professional Fees - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
AllightSykes Pty Ltd |
$1,481.47 |
|
|
|
Gensets - Hidden Valley Retreat - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Allmark & Associates Pty Ltd |
$341.00 |
|
|
|
Self Adhesive Labels - Customer Relations Centre |
|
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$25.10 |
|
|
|
Self-Inking Stamp - Community And Place |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Australia Pty Ltd |
$693.00 |
|
|
|
Fertiliser - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Aquamaster Reticulation Services |
$90.20 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Arcus Wire Group Pty Ltd |
$2,365.00 |
|
|
|
Art Wire And Fittings - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$879.13 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Art On The Move |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Cost Share For Art On The Move Touring Exhibition - A Year In The Making - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Artists Chronicle |
$570.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Community Art Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram |
$2,142.23 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
ATeam Cleaning Services |
$2,120.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Atelier JV |
$2,761.00 |
|
|
|
Structural Engineering Services - Koondoola Community Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$8.25 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Audio Technik |
$14,300.00 |
|
|
|
Supply Audio Equipment - Global Beats & Eats - Communications And Events |
|
|
|
|
Audio View Lifestyles Pty Ltd |
$4,237.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Overhead Speaker - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Australian Barbell Company Pty Ltd |
$549.78 |
|
|
|
Weights Equipment - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$1,400.00 |
|
|
|
Apparatus License Renewal Fees - IT |
|
|
|
|
Austswim WA |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Swim Centre Recognition - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro |
$2,623.50 |
|
|
|
Triple Cleanser - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ayan Mohamed Ali |
$192.00 |
|
|
|
Somalia Junior Stock - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Backyards To Barnyards |
$380.58 |
|
|
|
Consumables For Animals - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Banksia Grove Development Nominees Ltd |
$155.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement For 1 Ticket For Daniel Sims To Attend The UDIA Lunch 31.03.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Battery World Joondalup |
$59.85 |
|
|
|
Batteries - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
BAX Services |
$5,901.44 |
|
|
|
Sand Cleaning - Various Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Baycorp (WA) Pty Ltd |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Property Seizure & Sale Order - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$61,357.81 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Beilby Corporation |
$7,326.00 |
|
|
|
Second Instalment - Recruitment Of Director Planning & Sustainability - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$2,072.40 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Beryl Weston |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Hall - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
BGC Concrete |
$393.80 |
|
|
|
Cement Mix - Corner Sailshan & Key Largo Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Big Sky Entertainment (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
|
Music Performance - Global Beats And Eats - Communication And Events |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$3,758.96 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works - Various Locations - Projects/Assets |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$6,480.10 |
|
|
|
100 X Red Artic Cooler Bags - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
100 X Retractable Badge Holders - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
500 X Peppermints In Tin, 500 X Ballpoint Pens 7 100 X USB Flash Drive - Civic Functions |
|
|
|
|
Bluearth Foundation |
$3,267.00 |
|
|
|
School Holiday Multisport Program - Community Facility Planning |
|
|
|
|
Boating Camping Fishing |
$249.00 |
|
|
|
Marquee - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop Pty Ltd |
$1,091.08 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Bolinda Digital Pty Ltd |
$1,653.22 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of E-Book - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd |
$12,602.70 |
|
|
|
Architectural Services - New Civic Centre Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Boomerang Engineering (1971) Pty Ltd |
$232.32 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Boral Bricks Western Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,213.20 |
|
|
|
Bricks - Rendall Way - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group |
$5,254.86 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$25.25 |
|
|
|
Parts - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$7,189.33 |
|
|
|
Fuel - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Bridgeleigh Reception Centre |
$3,400.50 |
|
|
|
Catering - Mayor Ideas Breakfast For Strategic Community Plan - 07.04.2016 - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Venue/Catering - Planning Day - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Brikmakers |
$20,705.34 |
|
|
|
Brick/Pavers - Marmion Avenue & Penoy Boulevard - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$895.82 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Health |
|
|
|
|
Broderick Architects |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Architectural Fees - Cockman House - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$1,193.31 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Budget Truck Rentals |
$1,009.08 |
|
|
|
Hire - 1 Tonne Moving Van - Communications And Events |
|
|
|
|
Hire - Refrigerated Trailer - Communications And Events |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$3,193.44 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited |
$12,066.78 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Items - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Burdett & Associates |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Provision Of Structural Engineering Services For Design & Certification Of Refurbished Toilet Block At Fishermans Hollow - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Buswest |
$423.50 |
|
|
|
Bus Charter - Surf Life Saving WA Program - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
BW Truck Parts |
$221.35 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Byprogress Pty Ltd |
$1,401.50 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Hire Bouncy Castle - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Cancer Council WA |
$1,016.15 |
|
|
|
Frill Neck Hat - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$6,522.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,677.20 |
|
|
|
Feasibility Study - Quinns Beach Ocean Pool - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$11,105.90 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Materials - Engineering/Projects/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sweeping - Various Location - Projects & Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$12,961.30 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cat Welfare Society Incorporated |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Cat Impound Fee - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
CD-Soft Educational Resources |
$1,649.10 |
|
|
|
Educational CD - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$2,686.20 |
|
|
|
Batteries - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$2,236.83 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$21,842.13 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chinese Community Centre Lion Dance Troupe |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Lion Dance Performance - Events |
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography |
$1,245.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Christie Parksafe |
$18,738.50 |
|
|
|
Install New Barbeque - Rotary Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$8,090.50 |
|
|
|
AP Workflow Implementation - IT |
|
|
|
|
Sip2 Services - FE Technologies RFID Integration - IT |
|
|
|
|
Contracts Management Set Up Customer And Information Service - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$624.22 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$41,293.19 |
|
|
|
Recyclables - March 2016 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Clifton Perth |
$47,106.62 |
|
|
|
Equipment For Concert - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$8,020.61 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$1,983.33 |
|
|
|
Beverages - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Community Newspapers |
$10,404.67 |
|
|
|
Advertising For The City |
|
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$1,818.30 |
|
|
|
Supply & Lay Kikuyu - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Content Security Pty Ltd |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
External Penetration Testing - IT |
|
|
|
|
Conway Highbury Pty Ltd |
$2,673.00 |
|
|
|
Review Of Local Laws - February & March 2016 - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Scorecard |
$328.90 |
|
|
|
Financial Report Tender - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Corpvote Pty Ltd |
$4,315.85 |
|
|
|
Ballot Services - City Of Wanneroo Salaried Officers Enterprise Agreement 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$41.52 |
|
|
|
Couriers Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts |
$6,198.90 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Ltd |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Supplies Fire Extinguisher - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Cullys |
$1,380.98 |
|
|
|
Repair To ICV - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$193.47 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited |
$5,300.71 |
|
|
|
Software - IT |
|
|
|
|
Deep Freeze Annual Maintenance - IT |
|
|
|
|
Datacom Systems (WA) Pty Ltd |
$16,071.00 |
|
|
|
Disaster Recovery - March 2016 - IT |
|
|
|
|
De Vita & Dixon Lawyers |
$95,601.70 |
|
|
|
Legal Fee For The City |
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,551.00 |
|
|
|
Dell Monitor & Accessories - IT |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$5,850.36 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas |
$14,578.77 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Digital Chic |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Performance - Mambo Chic - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Digital Mapping Solutions - Perth |
$22,990.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance Intramaps Enterprise & Public - IT |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$3,374.38 |
|
|
|
Works For Two Way Radios - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$5,141.40 |
|
|
|
Printing - Signage - Department Of Sport & Recreation Works - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Printing - 12 X Corflutes For Community Art Awards |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Posters & Canvases - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Coreflutes - The Art Of Story - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Coreflutes - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Information Panels & Display Background - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
DM Breaker Equipment Pty Ltd |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Remu Bucket - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Donald Cant Watts Corke (WA) Pty Ltd |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Quantity Surveying Services March 2016 - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$38,851.35 |
|
|
|
Concrete Work - Various Locations - Engineering/Projects |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$169,324.11 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping & Drain Cleaning For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$498.50 |
|
|
|
Install Fridge Plug - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Driveshaft Balancing Services |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Plug In Shaft - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dunbar Services (WA) Pty Ltd |
$35.75 |
|
|
|
Filter Exchange - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
DVM Fencing |
$605.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs - Fencing Panel - Linwood Rise - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Install Fencing - Belcastro Way - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Dy-Mark (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$470.98 |
|
|
|
Paint Supplies - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Dymocks Joondalup |
$1,352.77 |
|
|
|
Book Club Kits - Books In A Bag Program - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Bookstock - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Easy Access Lifts |
$515.90 |
|
|
|
Main Pool Lift Service - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd |
$347.93 |
|
|
|
Hydrolab Quanta Rental - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$3,125.53 |
|
|
|
Case Management & Returning To Work Monitoring - OSH |
|
|
|
|
e-Fire & Safety |
$1,527.90 |
|
|
|
Service Fire Extinguishers - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms |
$214.50 |
|
|
|
Supply Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$6,083.00 |
|
|
|
Irrigation Items - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Playground Design - Warradale Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Design Irrigation System - Salitage Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga |
$2,571.03 |
|
|
|
Uniforms For Various Departments |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Associates |
$14,440.80 |
|
|
|
Quinns Foreshore Master Plan - Community Facility Planning |
|
|
|
|
Entire IT |
$5,435.00 |
|
|
|
Apple IMac, Consultants Fee & Accessories - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$140,923.85 |
|
|
|
Landscaping Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$1,098.00 |
|
|
|
Sample Chair - Safety & Injury Management |
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd |
$708.40 |
|
|
|
Parts Washer Hire - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Esandra Colbung |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Artwork - Acrylic On Canvas - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services |
$4,575.70 |
|
|
|
Investigate/Repair Fire Panels - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Every Second Counts |
$1,070.00 |
|
|
|
Develop Evacuation Diagrams - Koondoola Community Centre - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Evolution Traffic Control Pty Ltd |
$535.61 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Dundebar Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$264.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Audit - Mist Park & Leemans Landing - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Fast Finishing Services WA |
$1,500.40 |
|
|
|
Binding - Council Minutes - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Fatboy Slam |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
Hire - Sumo Suit - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$1,501.90 |
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Library |
|
|
|
|
FE Technologies Pty Ltd |
$1,892.00 |
|
|
|
Small Disc Tags - IT |
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services |
$5,685.35 |
|
|
|
Locations Of Services - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Forch WA Pty Ltd |
$79.20 |
|
|
|
Glue - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd |
$586.08 |
|
|
|
Aerosol Fortron Parts Cleaner - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$20,893.86 |
|
|
|
Uniform Issues - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,380.39 |
|
|
|
Printroom Supplies - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Game Vault Pty Ltd |
$1,400.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Game Vault Truck - Global Beats And Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Gastech Australia |
$418.00 |
|
|
|
Calibrate Gas Detectors - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Genie Australia |
$581.73 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$57,637.41 |
|
|
|
Pruning/Tree Removal Services - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$2,648.14 |
|
|
|
Traffic Assessment - Various Locations - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Grass Growers |
$29,082.66 |
|
|
|
Greenwaste - March 2016 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Mulching - Lenore Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$6,987.75 |
|
|
|
Goal Post Installation - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$185.42 |
|
|
|
Stakes, Rakes & Turf Doctor - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Party Hire |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Wine Glass Hire - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Gymcare |
$3,599.48 |
|
|
|
Service - Gym Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$4,171.10 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$45.56 |
|
|
|
Newspaper Subscriptions For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hart Sport |
$1,186.30 |
|
|
|
Sporting Equipment - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Headset ERA |
$833.25 |
|
|
|
Plantronics Equipment - IT |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$5,274.55 |
|
|
|
Safety Supplies - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hendercare |
$22,121.72 |
|
|
|
Support Services For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Hinds Sand Supplies |
$1,047.20 |
|
|
|
Turf Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$994.99 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hocking Planning & Architecture Pty |
$10,504.45 |
|
|
|
Heritage Architectural Services - Mary Lindsay Homestead - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Consultancy Fees - Heritage Inventory Review - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Holton Connor Pty Ltd |
$2,915.00 |
|
|
|
Architectural Services - Yanchep Open Space Amenities - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$1,122.96 |
|
|
|
Support Services For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$10,175.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hughan Saw Service |
$528.00 |
|
|
|
Blade For Circular Saw Part - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$19,009.14 |
|
|
|
Concrete - Rendell Way - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$23,664.30 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
IBolt Fencing |
$3,135.00 |
|
|
|
Supply\Install Pool Fencing - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
IFAP |
$2,310.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - OSH Premium Service - 29.04.2016 - 28.04.2017 - OSH |
|
|
|
|
IKEA |
$741.50 |
|
|
|
Furniture Items - School Holidays - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Two Seat Sofa & Lining Cloth - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Initial Hygiene |
$2,568.62 |
|
|
|
Sanitary Disposal Services - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services |
$7,066.35 |
|
|
|
Call Centre Services - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$4,311.95 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Events |
|
|
|
|
Portable Ablution Hire - Riverlinks - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$2,956.01 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$2,349.60 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intermedia Group Pty Ltd |
$73.95 |
|
|
|
Australian Ageing Agenda Subscription Renewal - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
International Art Services |
$643.50 |
|
|
|
Delivery - Perth Modern School To Wanneroo - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Isentia Pty Ltd |
$1,571.08 |
|
|
|
Media Monitoring - March 2016 - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$295.99 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$3,870.81 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
J.H. Fluid Transfer Solutions Pty Ltd |
$1,630.16 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd |
$208.23 |
|
|
|
Drawing Supplies - Hainsworth Art Program - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$7,481.00 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Jaycar Pty Ltd |
$146.95 |
|
|
|
Charger & Transceiver - Parks |
|
|
|
|
JBA Surveys |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Survey - Cadastral Boundary - Margaret Place - Projects |
|
|
|
|
JCA Fleet Services |
$747.65 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Coachline |
$1,430.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Hire - Supa Golf - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
Bus Hire - Trip To York - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$105.05 |
|
|
|
Medical Fee For The City |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$851.76 |
|
|
|
Repairs To WN 33218 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire |
$10,684.30 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
KC Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$283.80 |
|
|
|
Supply\Apply Letters To Sport Bibs - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
KDAire Mechanical Services |
$90,935.96 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kennards Hire Pty Ltd |
$493.00 |
|
|
|
Hire - Portable Of Toilets - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$23,877.08 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Various Locations - Projects/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Kismet (WA) Pty Ltd |
$605.00 |
|
|
|
Event ATM - Events |
|
|
|
|
Kitchens Direct |
$13,838.76 |
|
|
|
Installation Of Kitchen Units - Caretaker Cottage Marangaroo Golf Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
KLMedia Pty Ltd |
$310.16 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of DVD/CD's - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kokatu Pty Ltd |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Re-Upholster Storytime Chair - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Konnect (Coventry Fasteners) |
$94.55 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
KPMG |
$13,860.00 |
|
|
|
Forensic Audit - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Kristoffer Myhre |
$4,969.52 |
|
|
|
Photography Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$4,173.02 |
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Label Magic |
$441.10 |
|
|
|
Bin Stickers 2,000 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Indoor Plant Rental For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$11,949.96 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Forum Drycleaners |
$301.00 |
|
|
|
Drycleaning Uniforms - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Mini Hardware & Boxes Galore |
$1,611.82 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases - Engineering/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$879.05 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Laura Moseley |
$1,800.00 |
|
|
|
Food Curator - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$200,598.55 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Leamac Picture Framing |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Framing Artwork And Printing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Learning Seat Pty Ltd |
$2,611.40 |
|
|
|
Base Fee - March 2016 - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Leederville Camera House |
$3,333.80 |
|
|
|
Camera & Accessories - Capability & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$1,370.64 |
|
|
|
Group Fitness Licence Fees - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Life Cykel |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Hire - Bike Blender - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Lisa Fernandez |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
|
MC - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Living Eggs WA |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Hatch Kit - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Lobel Events |
$35,797.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Lounge Backline |
$865.90 |
|
|
|
Backline For Dan Sultan's Performance - Events |
|
|
|
|
Love Letters Au |
$3,140.00 |
|
|
|
Movie Letters - Live In The Amphitheatre - Events |
|
|
|
|
Letters - Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
$97,926.84 |
|
|
|
Landscape Design, Development & Contract Administration - Yanchep Active Open Space - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy Services - Oldham Park Meeting Room Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Lynford Motors |
$44,373.60 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle - Ranger 2015 - Fleet Asset |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,431.57 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Service - Fire Truck - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$2,102.88 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Card USB - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Marquee Magic |
$1,909.79 |
|
|
|
Hire - Marquee & Equipment - Blessing Of The Roads - Assets Management |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$66,391.16 |
|
|
|
Green Bins & Lids - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Matrix Productions |
$333.00 |
|
|
|
Staging, Dance Floor, Audio - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$69,401.20 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd |
$6,743.00 |
|
|
|
Construction Of Kingsway Baseball And Clubrooms Building - Projects |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Market Valuation Services - Property |
|
|
|
|
McLeods |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mercury Group of Companies Pty Ltd |
$2,838.00 |
|
|
|
E-Recruitment Fees - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Merit Consulting Group |
$19,911.10 |
|
|
|
Demolition Works - Lagoon Drive Yanchep - Property |
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$716.63 |
|
|
|
Interactive Voice - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$386.76 |
|
|
|
Stationery - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Cash Register Company |
$133.98 |
|
|
|
Thermal Paper Rolls - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
MGA Town Planners |
$254.38 |
|
|
|
Retail Needs Assessment - Trinity West - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$2,214.01 |
|
|
|
Steel Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$397,211.92 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$6,941.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment & Repairs - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors |
$564.00 |
|
|
|
Chemicals - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Miss Emily Drew |
$5,510.00 |
|
|
|
Provision Of Event Assistant Service - Events |
|
|
|
|
Modern Motor Trimmers |
$599.50 |
|
|
|
Seat Belt - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd |
$320.76 |
|
|
|
Creche Toy Supplies - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Move It |
$1,906.25 |
|
|
|
Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ms Anne Yardley |
$2,538.00 |
|
|
|
Oral History Interviews - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
MSC Safe Company |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Pick Up & Dispose Of Chubb Safe - Community Facilities Operations |
|
|
|
|
Nastech WA Pty Ltd |
$2,522.00 |
|
|
|
Surveying & Town Planning Service - Marangaroo Family Centre - Property |
|
|
|
|
Natalie Asha Enterprises |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Performance - Samba - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
National Archives of Australia |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Exhibition Loan Fee - A Place Called Home - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$16,151.34 |
|
|
|
Maintenance Works - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Nature Play Solutions |
$3,605.80 |
|
|
|
Ridgewood Nature Playground Investigation - Community & Place |
|
|
|
|
Nespresso Professional |
$486.00 |
|
|
|
Coffee Pods & Accessories - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Nessco Pressure Systems |
$307.12 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Newsxpress Ocean Keys |
$40.80 |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
|
Non Organic Disposal |
$396.00 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Construction Material - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$2,821.70 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$2,129.95 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet/Parks/Stores/Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$1,001.00 |
|
|
|
Tinting - Bobcat - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Fit 2 X Windscreens - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nufab Industries Pty Ltd |
$125.40 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nuford |
$308.00 |
|
|
|
Check And Repair Engine - WN 33214 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting |
$5,750.00 |
|
|
|
Beach Cleaning Services - February/March - Various Locations |
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$789.14 |
|
|
|
Monthly Maintenance Fees - Colourwave Printer - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Charges - Scanner - IT |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$57,958.02 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Officemax |
$259.89 |
|
|
|
Printroom Supplies - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$341.96 |
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Gallery Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Open Windows Software Pty Ltd |
$9,358.18 |
|
|
|
Contract Software Travel & Accommodation Expenses - IT |
|
|
|
|
Open Window Contracts - Customer And Information Services |
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd |
$23,046.09 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Marmion Avenue And Neerabup Road Duplication - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Connolly Drive Dual Carriageway - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group |
$1,529.63 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Various Employees & Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries |
$217.80 |
|
|
|
Recycling Bin Exchange - IM |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
|
Arboricultural Report - Various - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parins |
$2,507.48 |
|
|
|
Repairs - WN 33107 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Perth Audiovisual |
$540.38 |
|
|
|
Equipment - Blessing Of The Roads - Road And Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Cleaning - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Transport Fees - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd |
$986.92 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Perth Racing Security |
$2,768.70 |
|
|
|
Security - Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Pharaohs Vending Services |
$435.64 |
|
|
|
Confectionery - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd |
$340.00 |
|
|
|
License - Public Performance Of Protected Sound - Community Facilities |
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting |
$1,232.00 |
|
|
|
Supply And Install Bullnose Capping - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Inspect Gates - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$529.99 |
|
|
|
Network Cable - IT |
|
|
|
|
PMP Distribution |
$910.92 |
|
|
|
Distribution Of Flyers - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Precision Laser Systems |
$342.50 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Pipe Laser - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$36,678.89 |
|
|
|
CCTV/Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$1,692.18 |
|
|
|
Printing - Flyers - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Library Welcome Brochure - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Junior Programs - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Private Drive |
$479.60 |
|
|
|
Transportation - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$6,934.06 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$2,319.11 |
|
|
|
Safety Items For The City |
|
|
|
|
Put On Happy Face - Face Painting |
$1,548.00 |
|
|
|
Face Painting - Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Face/Body Painting - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Qwest Property Pty Ltd |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation Services - Property |
|
|
|
|
Raeco |
$108.11 |
|
|
|
Stationery Supplies - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Ralph Beattie Bosworth |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd |
$134.99 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Redimed Pty Ltd |
$7,542.97 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reece's Hire & Structures |
$10,412.60 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Retro Rewind And Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Reinol WA |
$430.32 |
|
|
|
Handcleanser - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$74,935.98 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works - Various Locations - Parks/Building Maintenance/Property |
|
|
|
|
Richgro |
$1,009.00 |
|
|
|
Mulch - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,141.35 |
|
|
|
Image Printer Charges - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Finance |
$3,294.50 |
|
|
|
Printer Lease Fee - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Rightrack |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Wheel Alignment - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$1,675.30 |
|
|
|
Linemarking - Landsdale Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia |
$27,296.34 |
|
|
|
Signs - Illegal Dumping - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Roads To Recovery - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Symbolic Stickers - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Clean Up After Your Dog - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Temporary Green 11th Hole - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Fishermans Hollow Beach Access - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Install Name Plates - Ocean Keys - Property |
|
|
|
|
Sign - New Notice Of Offence - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Supply Roll Flagging - Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Signage Plate - Various Parks |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$168,277.33 |
|
|
|
Road Works - Various Locations For The City |
|
|
|
|
Robertsons Lifting & Rigging Pty Ltd |
$404.14 |
|
|
|
Testing Of Chains & Lifting Gear - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Roseworthy WA Pty Ltd |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Iceberg Rose - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$745.03 |
|
|
|
Air Filters, Trimlines, Brushcutter Heads - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd |
$525.94 |
|
|
|
Monthly Hire For Cabin Container - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue |
$8,654.80 |
|
|
|
Install Ladder Safety System - Yanchep Communication Tower - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Safety World |
$564.25 |
|
|
|
Safety Items - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Safetyquip |
$413.28 |
|
|
|
Red Helmet Cap/Vests - Safety - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$2,981.35 |
|
|
|
Safety Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Scatena Clocherty Architects |
$33,236.50 |
|
|
|
Architectural Services - Riverlinks Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Scott Lawrence Collins |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Photography - Jewellery Exhibit - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$484.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - What's Happening - Communications And Events |
|
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$2,234.17 |
|
|
|
Kitchen Supplies - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Sealin Roger Garlett |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Welcome To Country Blessing - Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Seton Australia |
$605.44 |
|
|
|
Danger Asbestos Tape - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Shire Of York |
$181.50 |
|
|
|
Museum Entry - Gold Program - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$1,674.20 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals & Repair Trolley - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Sign Synergy Pty Ltd |
$3,273.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Lettering - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$6,437.75 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$5,940.00 |
|
|
|
Soil Samples - Lake Badgerup - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Asbestos Containing Material - Lake Badgerup - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Detailed Site Investigation - Lake Badgerup - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$3,433.50 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$6,308.50 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports |
$1,127.50 |
|
|
|
Volleyball Equipment - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Smart Colour Signs |
$3,096.50 |
|
|
|
Stickers City Of Wanneroo - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Reported Stickers - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$2,381.50 |
|
|
|
Repair To Softfall - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$78.10 |
|
|
|
Paint Supply - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sorensen Short & Associates |
$148.50 |
|
|
|
Drafting - Lodge DP407753 - Leasing And Land |
|
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions |
$82.17 |
|
|
|
CD/DVD Cases - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$30.36 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Treat Puffballs On Tennis Court - Elliot Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd |
$297.00 |
|
|
|
Soil Analysis - Jimbub And Quinns Foreshore - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$89.90 |
|
|
|
Materials For Peg Dolls - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Squire Patton Boggs |
$19,402.90 |
|
|
|
Legal Fee For The City |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$4,293.91 |
|
|
|
First Aid Kit Servicing - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Training - CPR Refresher And Books - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Ambulance Cost - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Training - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - 24.03.2016 - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Standout Signs |
$1,408.00 |
|
|
|
Supply\Install Stainless Steel Letters - Brazier Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
State Law Publisher |
$171.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Government Gazette - Rates & Planning |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$452.30 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Items - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$17,754.00 |
|
|
|
Fleet Workshop - Empty Washdown Bay Tank |
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Chemical Waste Tank - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Waste Water Tank Repairs - Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Stats WA Pty Ltd |
$753.50 |
|
|
|
Compaction Testing - Marmion Avenue - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sterihealth Services Pty Ltd |
$344.11 |
|
|
|
Delivery Of S22 Sharpsmart - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company P Ltd |
$1,374.40 |
|
|
|
Cargo Pants - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Stiles Electrical |
$12,717.21 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 3 - Pedestrian Crossing Light - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Subih Formwork |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Performance Citizenship Awards - 26.01.2016 - Events |
|
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo |
$846.25 |
|
|
|
Catering Services - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$1,261.70 |
|
|
|
Brooms - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette |
$280.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Of Sports Bibs - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Surekleen Products |
$171.60 |
|
|
|
Hands First Pump - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Surf Life Saving WA Incorporated |
$66,190.11 |
|
|
|
CPR Refresher Course 11.03.2016 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Lifeguard Contract April 2016 - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Systems Edge Management Services Pty Ltd |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Consultancy - Neerabup Strategic Link - NSRF Pear Review - CEO's Office |
|
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd |
$890.12 |
|
|
|
Bin Liners - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Kitchen Supplies - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$3,476.79 |
|
|
|
Refund - Duplicate Payment - Decorative Street Lighting |
|
|
|
|
Tanya Voltchanskaya |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Services - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Techwest Solutions Pty Ltd |
$176.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Aqua Aerobic Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Teknacool Marketing |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Replacement Of Reflective Kerb Number - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Tenderlink.com |
$1,347.50 |
|
|
|
7 X Public Tenders - Contracts And Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Terry Southam & Associates |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Engineering Consultancy - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
The Civic Group |
$20,020.00 |
|
|
|
Proposed Fee - Advocacy Campaign Services - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
The Community Network Australia Dig Advertising Networks |
$198.83 |
|
|
|
TV Advertising - April 2016 - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara |
$4,095.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Linen Press |
$307.00 |
|
|
|
Hiring Of Linen - Agricultural Dinner 11.03.2016 - Events |
|
|
|
|
The Publican Group Pty Ltd |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Function Deposit - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$3,779.33 |
|
|
|
Equipment Testing - Fleet/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$13,340.80 |
|
|
|
Completed Home Pool Inspections - Health & Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Watch Around Water Wristbands - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For The Campbell Family Trust |
$231.00 |
|
|
|
Photographer - Age Friendly Strategy - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for The Entertainment Bank Trust |
$4,097.50 |
|
|
|
Entertainment - African Drums - Events |
|
|
|
|
Think Promotional |
$1,176.45 |
|
|
|
Promotional USB Drives - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$1,646.25 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Tony Pankiw |
$7,975.00 |
|
|
|
Pearsall/Hocking Community Art Commission - Payment 1 Of 4 - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Top Of The Ladder Gutter Cleaning |
$8,426.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Building Roof - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$1,227.05 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd |
$4,539.92 |
|
|
|
Service Work - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$36,691.30 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$2,324.61 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$48,853.20 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$142,083.70 |
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - March 2016 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Lay Turf - Showgrounds - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade |
$4,143.19 |
|
|
|
Annual Contribution Towards Running Costs 2016 - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Renewal Of PO Box At Australia Post - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Ink For Printer - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Unicare Health |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Sling For Pool Hoist - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
UNLTD Power Pty Ltd |
$69,154.60 |
|
|
|
Equipment Upgrade - Various Locations - Strategic & Environmental Planning |
|
|
|
|
Veda Advantage Information Services Solutions |
$630.25 |
|
|
|
Bureau Charges - Community Safety And Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$8,168.88 |
|
|
|
Bin Collection - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Vetcare Innovation Pty Ltd |
$589.40 |
|
|
|
Microchip X 13 - Canine/Feline - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia X 1 Dog - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Treatment - Injured Dog - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Vetcare - Laboratory Internal - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$29,545.70 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Vision IDZ |
$511.50 |
|
|
|
Printing - Membership Cards - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$2,651.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Roller Door - Fleet - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Sliding Doors - Kingsway Cricket Storage Shed |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$2,150.17 |
|
|
|
Spare Parks - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$924.00 |
|
|
|
Stationery Supplies - Library |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company |
$2,436.17 |
|
|
|
Limestone - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
WA Music Therapy Pty Ltd |
$154.00 |
|
|
|
Music Therapy Sessions - Heights Community House - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
WA Safety And Training Pty Ltd |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Officer Site Duties Briefing - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One |
$39.85 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Funding Of Nexedus Spaces And Engagement Coach - Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Community Mens Shed Incorporated |
$2,270.00 |
|
|
|
Management Fee For Computers - 01.07.2015 To 30.06.2016 - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$50,704.43 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Glass |
$1,350.00 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA |
$240.82 |
|
|
|
Groceries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$888.38 |
|
|
|
Repair Accident Damage - WN 33479 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$3,544.20 |
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Community Safety And Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$1,281.95 |
|
|
|
Name Badges - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Soccer Silver Medals - Community And Place |
|
|
|
|
Plaque For The Kingsway Baseball - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Well Played Consulting Group Pty Ltd |
$1,573.00 |
|
|
|
Golf Course Consultancy - Property |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$105.60 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Newspaper Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$8,847.33 |
|
|
|
Nurses For Immunisation Clinic - Health & Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$461.59 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$25,219.19 |
|
|
|
Removal Of Green Waste From Motivation Drive Site - Waste |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$280.72 |
|
|
|
Cash Transit - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd |
$40,304.59 |
|
|
|
Support Services For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$7,436.26 |
|
|
|
Security - Council Briefing Sessions - Community Safety And Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Casual Safety Patrol Officers - Community Safety And Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Security Services - Butler Community Centre - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Wink Peace Pout Photobooths |
$770.00 |
|
|
|
Photobooth Hire - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$2,334.15 |
|
|
|
Safety Items - Various Departments |
|
|
|
|
Workshed Children's Mosaics |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Mosaic Works - Quinns Beach Toilet - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Worlds Best Products Pty Ltd |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Remover - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$1,064.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Xercise Pro |
$184.95 |
|
|
|
Network License Pro-Rata From 07.05.2016 - 21.08.2016 - IT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002544 |
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd |
$136.43 |
|
|
|
Licence (Music) - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
BAX Services |
$1,058.31 |
|
|
|
Sand Cleaning - Various Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Beryl Weston |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Hall - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Committee for Perth |
$6,050.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Local Government Membership - CEO's Office |
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$603.90 |
|
|
|
Signs - Heated Program Pool - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Vinyl Banner For Global Beats & Eats Festival 2016 - Events |
|
|
|
|
DVM Fencing |
$2,511.00 |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Fencing - Depot - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$524.64 |
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
Foxtel |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
Hula Magic Entertainers |
$900.00 |
|
|
|
Live Polynesian Performance - Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$4,612.90 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$1,555.98 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA |
$900.00 |
|
|
|
Conference - 10.03.2016 2 X Employees - Traffic & Transport |
|
|
|
|
JAG Hospitality |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
6 X Meal Vouchers For Global Beats & Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$28.00 |
|
|
|
Remmington Groomer - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$1,033.20 |
|
|
|
Photocopier/Printer Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$7,175.39 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$7,210.16 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Nastech WA Pty Ltd |
$2,522.00 |
|
|
|
Surveying Services - Marangaroo Family Centre - Land & Leasing |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$3,804.46 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Qwest Property Pty Ltd |
$2,520.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation Services - Moorpark Avenue - Leasing & Land |
|
|
|
|
Sheridans For Badges |
$122.60 |
|
|
|
Name Badge - Mayor Tracey Roberts |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$640.00 |
|
|
|
Provision Of 4 First Aid 1 Day Courses - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Staples Australia Pty Ltd |
$12,452.44 |
|
|
|
Stationery For The City - March 2016 |
|
|
|
|
SwingZing |
$420.00 |
|
|
|
Swing Dance Workshops For Retro Rewind - Events |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$21,647.60 |
|
|
|
GST Payable For March 2016 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
The Northern Mens Shed |
$325.00 |
|
|
|
4 X Smell Boxes For Museum Display - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$558.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002545 |
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aqua Attack Swim Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Ashdale Netball Club Incorporated |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Australian Library & Information Association |
$1,900.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Membership - 2016 / 2017 - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$295.20 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$879.20 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$512,556.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Ballajura Association Football Club Incorporated |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 11 |
|
|
|
|
Beaumaris Netball Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Child |
|
|
|
|
Bombers Junior Football Club |
$340.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Brighton Seahawks Football Club |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 22 Children |
|
|
|
|
Butler Netball Club Incorporated |
$2,800.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 14 Children |
|
|
|
|
Carine Junior Football Club |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Cougars JFC |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 22 Children |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$628.43 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Churches Of Christ Sport & Recreation Association Incorporated |
$1,355.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 7 Children |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$5,868.22 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$832.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$121.87 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Travel Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Cracovia Club Incorporated |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 6 Children |
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf |
$38,185.43 |
|
|
|
Carramar Golf Course Commission Fees - Land & Leasing |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$19,340.29 |
|
|
|
50% Cost Sharing - Community Fire Manager Period 01.01.2016 - 31.03.2016 - Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
DFES |
$547.44 |
|
|
|
Fault - Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubroom - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Repair Connection - Cockman House - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd |
$33,491.93 |
|
|
|
Marangaroo Golf Course Commission Fees - Land & Leasing |
|
|
|
|
Eric Jan Byleveld |
$380.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$499.80 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Giants Basketball Club |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$950.15 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd |
$1,017.50 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Contingency - Liddell Park - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Jitterbugs Syncro Ice Skating Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup & District Rugby League Club Incorporated |
$490.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Brothers Rugby Union |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup City Football Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Kinross Jnr Football Club |
$175.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup United Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Kingsley Junior Football Club Incorporated |
$580.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 4 Children |
|
|
|
|
Kingsway Junior Football Club Incorporated |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Kingsway United Christian Football Incorporated |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 11 Children |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$1,082.40 |
|
|
|
Land Enquiries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Netball Club |
$950.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Leederville Tennis Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,132.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$1,129.81 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Moore River Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Mr Paul Gravett |
$697.93 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Relocation Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Mr Rodney Lewin |
$196.90 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Class Endorsement - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ron Hoffman |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Patricia Augustin |
$809.78 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Return Flights For Annual ERM Conference In Canberra 27 - 28.04.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Tracey Hayward |
$110.50 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - F Class Endorsement - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
North Beach Boys Brigade |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
North Beach Junior Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Ocean Ridge Junior Football Club Incorporated |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Basketball Club Incorporated |
$2,615.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 19 Children |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Districts Netball Club |
$480.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 5 Children |
|
|
|
|
Quinns FC Incorporated |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 10 Children |
|
|
|
|
Rugby Union Football Club Of Perth Bayswater Incorporated |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Saints Netball Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Scarborough Junior Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$13,276.15 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The New Zealand Sports & Cultural Centre Association Incorporated |
$2,380.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 12 Children |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$912.01 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Aust WA Division Incorporated |
$285.00 |
|
|
|
2 X Attendees - Lunch With The Premier - Planning And Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Pty Ltd |
$3,566.79 |
|
|
|
Monthly SMS Alert - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo City Soccer Club Incorporates |
$1,200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 6 |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Districts Jnr Rugby Union Football Club |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Vouchers X 4 Children |
|
|
|
|
Warwick Greenwood Junior Football Club |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Gymnastics Incorporated |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
West Coasters Netball Club Kingsway (Incorporated) |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$42,162.00 |
|
|
|
Crown Easement Costs - Vancouver Street - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Install Electrical Supply - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002546 |
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Online Registration Services |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - ASCTA Convention 18.04.2016 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002547 |
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation April 2016 - $45,625.95 Breakdown On Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$9,133,169.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
|
Hopgood Ganim - Legal Fees |
$9,250.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers - Legal Fees |
$0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 9 |
|
|
|
|
Justin Sonia - Finalisation Of Contribution Arrangements |
$184,436.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TPS |
$193,686.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED PAYMENTS FROM PREVIOUS PERIODS |
|||
|
2519-3768 |
22.03.2016 |
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
-$5,850.00 |
|
105214 |
09.02.2016 |
Danielle Riney |
-$242.00 |
|
103858 |
08.10.2015 |
Landsdale Cricket Club Incorporated |
-$810.00 |
|
105476 |
02.03.2016 |
Hoi Cho Hoa Xuan |
-$1,775.00 |
|
105688 |
23.03.2016 |
Western Australian Planning Commission |
-$3,044.94 |
|
105533 |
09.03.2016 |
F2C All Stars |
-$500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
-$12,221.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual Journals |
|||
|
|
|
FER Lodgement Fee - 29 Unpaid Infringements |
-$1,508.00 |
|
|
|
Click Super - March 2016 |
$644,002.14 |
|
|
|
Bank Fee - Returned Creditors Payment 30.03.2016 |
-$2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
$642,491.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account |
|||
|
|
|
Payroll Payments April 2016 |
|
|
|
|
04.04.2016 |
$495.54 |
|
|
|
12.04.2016 |
$1,797,839.27 |
|
|
|
26.04.2016 |
$1,680,693.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Payroll |
$3,479,027.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002547 |
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation April 2016 - Bank Fees |
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$212.33 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$12,495.64 |
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee |
$167.04 |
|
|
|
BPay Fees Debtors |
$117.98 |
|
|
|
BPay Fees Rates |
$11,580.36 |
|
|
|
BPoint Fees Debtors |
$42.58 |
|
|
|
BPoint Fees Rates |
$916.31 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$413.78 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$101.00 |
|
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$401.71 |
|
|
|
Aquamotion Direct Debit Return Fees |
$27.50 |
|
|
|
Fast Track Quick Cash Envelope Fee |
$225.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Autosum Total |
$26,701.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation April 2016 - Credit Cards |
|
|
|
|
N Jennings |
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$11.20 |
|
|
|
The Law Society - Mandatory CPD Points Training - Governance And Legal |
$472.00 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Breakfast Meeting 26.02.2016 |
$43.60 |
|
|
|
Legalwise Seminar - Advance Retail And Commercial Leasing - 01.03.2016 - 2 X Attendees |
$960.00 |
|
|
|
Portner Press - Purchase Of E-Book - Mental Health At Work |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Legalwise Seminar - Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation Claims Seminar |
$480.00 |
|
|
|
Legalwise Seminar - Contract Drafting Essentials 30.03.2016 |
$480.00 |
|
|
|
Gumtree Australia - Advertisement Fee For Kindy Gym Coach Kingsway |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Western Power - Easement Encroachment Inspection Prior To Hardcastle Park Upgrade With Play Equipment |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Credit Card Charge - Western Power -Easement Encroachment Inspection Prior To Hardcastle Park Upgrade With Play Equipment |
$1.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Hodges |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting & Interview |
$74.80 |
|
|
|
Purchase - Used Railway Sleepers From Mountain Movers |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Booking Of Accommodation - Study Tour Of Victoria - 14 & 16.03.2016 |
$324.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Collaboration For Impact Conference Melbourne 2016 |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Singh |
|
|
|
|
Assets Leadership Work Shop |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Yildiz |
|
|
|
|
Conference Fee - Annual ERM Conference For Government 2016 - Coordinator Risk - 27 - 28.04.2016 - Governance And Legal |
$2,858.90 |
|
|
|
Air Fare - Return Perth Adelaide - Cr S Fenn - Attending UDIA National Congress In Adelaide - 07 - 10.03.2016 |
$553.60 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Cr S Fenn - Attending UDIA National Congress In Adelaide - 07 - 10.03.2016 |
$2,770.46 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - February Breakfast Meeting - Wanneroo Business Association - Cr L Aitken |
$27.00 |
|
|
|
Accommodation - Cr S Fenn - Attending UDIA National Congress In Adelaide - 07 - 10.03.2016 |
$791.70 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - UDIA Luncheon With Premier - 8 X Attendees |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - February Breakfast Meeting - Wanneroo Business Association - Mayor Roberts |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. St. John |
|
|
|
|
Air Fare - Return Adelaide - UDIA Conference In Adelaide - 07 - 11.03.2016 |
$583.00 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality Meeting |
$14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments |
$18,924.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees & Credit Cards |
$45,625.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup April 2016 |
$9,610,703.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$9,656,329.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$13,135,357.03 |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 424
Property Services
3.29 Additional Funding for the Acquisition of Environmental Offset Land for the Neerabup Industrial Area
File Ref: 3383V03 – 16/154596
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the request for the allocation of additional funds to purchase offset land in accordance with the environment offset package for the Neerabup Industrial Area.
Background
The City owns in freehold several major landholdings which form part of the Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA). Lots 9000, 9003, 41 and portion of Lot 600 Neerabup represent approximately 212 hectares of the total area of 1,032 hectares that makes up the NIA.
Prior to any clearing or development of the City’s NIA landholdings the City engaged environmental consultants to carry out assessment. This was due to environmental constraints over the land particularly as it was a known habitat for the Carnaby Black-Cockatoo. The consultants in conjunction with the environmental agencies negotiated the terms and conditions of an environmental offset package for the NIA.
The Australian Government Department of the Environment (DotE) assessed the City's proposed offset package and presented an amended package to the City.
Administration presented a report (CB02-03/14) to Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 4 March 2014, which outlined the proposed environmental offset package for the NIA where it resolved:
"That Council:-
1. NOTES the Department for the Environment and Department of Parks and Wildlife's revised Environmental Offset Package for clearing and development of the City's landholdings in the Neerabup Industrial Area, comprising the following:
a) Purchase of 650 hectares of suitable quality direct offset land within the Gingin area classified as 'good' to 'excellent';
b) Ceding free of cost to the Crown as a Class 'A' Nature Reserve, the 50 hectares of Lots 9000 and 41 Mather Drive, Neerabup as depicted in Attachment 2;
c) Ceding free of cost to the Crown as a Class 'A' Nature Reserve, the whole of Lot 24 Mary Street, Wanneroo; and
d) Rehabilitation of 20 hectares of the former Pinjar Park Landfill Site (Reserve11598 Old Yanchep Road, Neerabup).
2. NOTES the cost of implementing the Environmental Offset Package referred to in 1. above is estimated to be in the order of $2.04 Million and LISTS this amount for consideration in the City's 10 Year Capital Works Program, generally in accordance with the staging in the table in Attachment 3; and
3. ADVISES the Department for the Environment and Department of Parks and Wildlife that Council AGREES to the revised Environmental Offset Package for clearing and development of the City's landholdings in the Neerabup Industrial Area, as outlined in 1. above, and AUTHORISES the Manager Property Services to seek to negotiate the purchase of less than 650 hectares of land for direct offset, on the basis that the ceding of 50 hectares of Lot 9000 and 41 Mather Drive, Neerabup and all of Lot 24 Mary Street, Wanneroo as Class 'A' Nature Reserves warrants a reduced requirement for offsite offset land."
Within the report Administration considered that an indicative cost of $2,045,000 would be required to fund the purchase and future maintenance of NIA environmental offset land, with the anticipated cost to be accommodated within the City's “then” 10 Year Capital Works Program under Project PR-1006 (Development Industrial Area – Neerabup).
Pursuant to Resolution 3 above the Manager Property Services renegotiated the required amount of offset land from 650 hectares to 400 hectares.
On 2 June 2014 the City received conditional approval (ECBC–2007/3479) from the DotE in accordance with the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The conditions of approval included the following:
· purchase of 400 hectare offset property in the vicinity of Gingin, Western Australia;
· remediation of 20 hectares of the 25 hectare former landfill site located at 1815 Old Yanchep Road, Pinjar;
· creation of an onsite conservation reserve of 50 hectares; and
· the transfer of Lot 24 Mary Street, Wanneroo as a conservation reserve.
The Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPAW) is the State Government regulatory authority responsible for the identification and negotiation for purchase of suitable land parcels for the requirements of environmental offset agreements. Administration has been liaising with DPAW since receipt of approval for the City’s NIA environmental offset package.
Detail
The approved 20 Year Capital Works Program for PR-1006, for the implementation of the NIA environmental offset package amounts to $2,045,000:
· with $650,000 apportioned to the purchase of the 650 hectares of suitable offset landholdings;
· $1,000,000 for the remediation and rehabilitation of the former Pinjar Park landfill site; and;
· the balance for ongoing environmental maintenance programs.
At the time of the 2014 DotE approval, the City was advised that land values within the Gingin area were estimated at $1,000 (ex GST) per hectare which consequently influenced the indicative costing.
Following initial onsite environmental investigations, the DotE rejected the Pinjar Park site as suitable for rehabilitation and consequently has been removed from the NIA environmental offset package. The City has been advised that the purchase of an additional 95 hectares of offset land in lieu of the Pinjar Park site has been agreed in principle by both Federal and State agencies.
Administration was recently notified by DPAW that it had identified a suitable landholding within the Gingin area (Attachment 1 refers) that satisfied the criteria of the approved NIA environmental offset package and advised it had negotiated a purchase price of $1,000,000 (GST free) to secure the properties.
The identified landholding comprises the whole of Lot 103 and portion of Lot 104 on Plan 17335 located on Brennan Road, Bindoon in the Shire of Chittering (the Subject Land), totalling 647 hectares in area (Attachment 2 refers).
Upon request the City was sent an itemised invoice (No.18611) from DPAW totalling $1,077,000 (incl GST) for the purchase of the Subject Land (Attachment 3 refers). The general contents of the invoice are outlined below:
|
Purchase of the Subject Land |
$1,000,000 |
(GST free) |
$1,000,000 |
|
Conveyancing, survey and subdivision fees |
$20,000 |
(ex GST) |
$22,000 |
|
5% Administration fee on land purchase |
$50,000 |
(ex GST) |
$55,000 |
|
Total: |
$1,070,000 |
|
$1,077,000 |
The DPAW negotiated acquisition price equates to $1,545 (GST free) per hectare.
The Subject Land (647ha) is in excess of the current offset requirements of the City (negotiated offset area: 400ha plus the offset land in lieu of Pinjar Park site: 95ha). This equates to an excess balance of 152 hectares. It is intended that Administration will formally request DotE and DPAW to have the excess offset landholding (152ha) registered for “land-banking” for other projects that may be subjected to environmental offset agreements. Such as projects that involve road widening encroachments or the land development within environmentally sensitive areas.
Available budget funds within PR-1006 amount to $853,866 as at 31 March 2016. Therefore a re-allocation of additional funds will be required to enable the imminent purchase of the Subject Land. The following table below is an extract from the City’s Project Expenditure Reporting tool for Project PR-1006.
|
Project(s) Summary PR-1006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Project(s) Budget* |
- |
Actual Expenditure* |
- |
Commitments |
= |
Remaining Available Budget |
||||||||
|
(LTD Outstanding Purchase Orders) |
|
or (Overspend on Budget) |
||||||||||||
|
899,150 |
- |
39,782 |
- |
5,501 |
= |
853,866 |
||||||||
|
*For the period July 2015 - March 2016. |
||||||||||||||
Administration recommends the use of $800,000 of the existing funds within PR-1006 and requests the allocation of additional funding of $277,000 from the Neerabup Development Reserve to PR-1006. This will enable the purchase of the Subject Land and retain minimal funds within PR-1006 for the remainder of the 2015/2016 financial year.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
To assist with the future development of the City’s landholdings in the NIA Administration recommends the re-allocation of addition funding of $277,000 from the Neerabup Development Reserve to PR-1006.
Administration recommends the purchase of the Subject Land to satisfy the conditions ECBC–2007/3479 to allow for the purchase of the Subject Land.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.1 Local Jobs - You can choose to work locally and reduce the impact of travel time on you and your family.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Land Acquisition |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The amount of $2,045,000 was included in the City's 2014/2015 Capital Works Programme under PR-1006 to fund the purchase, rehabilitation and maintenance of landholdings included within the environmental offset landholdings for the NIA.
Project PR-1006 (Develop Industrial Area - Neerabup) currently has available funds of $853,866. Following the purchase of the Subject Land a balance amount of $53,866 should remain available in PR-1006 for the 2015/2016 financial year. Existing funds within PR-1006 were previously sourced from the Neerabup Development Reserve.
Administration estimates an additional $277,000 will be required for the land acquisition, cost of survey, subdivision, conveyancing and administration fees.
Administration recommends the required extra funding of $277,000 be re-allocated from the Neerabup Development Reserve to PR-1006.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the identification of suitable environmental offset land by the Department of Parks and Wildlife, described as Lot 103 and portion Lot 104 (Plan 17335) Brennan Road, Bindoon comprising a total area of 647 hectares in accordance with the Department of the Environment approval ECBC–2007/3479.
2. NOTES the Department of Parks and Wildlife invoice (No. 18611) received by the City of Wanneroo for the acquisition of the environmental offset landholdings described in 1 above;
3. APPROVES the following budget variation to accommodate the shortfall in funding for the purchase of Lot 103 and portion Lot 104 (Plan 17335) Brennan Road, Bindoon.
|
Project No./Account Code |
From |
To |
Description |
|
Neerabup Development Reserve |
$277,000 |
|
Reserve funds set aside for the further development of the Neerabup Industrial Area |
|
PR-1006 |
|
$277,000 |
Neerabup Industrial Area : Acquisition of Offset Land; Estimated Conveyancing, Surveying and Subdivision costs; and Administration fees. |
4. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 (WA) APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the agreed expenditure for the payment of the costs and fees to acquire the environmental offset land as outlined in the body of this report; and
5. NOTES the costs and fees to acquire the environmental offset land will be funded from the Neerabup Development Reserve.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Report Attachment 1 - Purchase of Lots 103 and 104 Brennan Road - Location Plan |
16/156908 |
|
|
2. |
Report Attachment 2 - Purchase of Lots 103 and 104 Brennan Road - Aerial Site Plan |
16/156918 |
|
|
3. |
DPAW Invoice 18611 - Purchase of Lots 103 and 104 P17335 NIA Offset Land |
16/156905 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 432
File Ref: 7891 – 16/104165
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Previous Items: AS03-01/16 - Gnangara Road/Marathon Loop, Madeley - Accessiblity Issues and Options - Ordinary Council - 02 Feb 2016 7.00pm
AS02-03/16 - Ordinary Council - 01 Mar 2016 7.00pm
Issue
To consider the dedication as a road reserve of the City’s freehold land at Lot 3 (57L) Gnangara Road, Madeley and small adjoining portions of pedestrian accessways at Lots 126 and 127 on Diagram 98587.
Background
The North Madeley Residential Precinct (NMRP) is a residential area bounded by Wanneroo Road, Gnangara Road, Windsor Road and the proposed Gnangara Road re-alignment (which will connect Gnangara Road and Whitfords Avenue) (Attachment 1 refers). The NMRP has only one vehicle access from Gnangara Road, being Buffalo Avenue.
A second vehicle access to the NMRP will be constructed from Buffalo Avenue north to the realigned Gnangara Road in the future. However, the timeframe for this second access is not known, due to the overall delay by Main Roads WA (MRWA) in initiating the Gnangara Road/ Whitfords Avenue realignment. As a result of funding and land acquisition issues, neither a proposed grade-separated interchange nor a potential interim solution of a four-way at-grade intersection can be progressed by MRWA in the foreseeable future (5-10 years).
Between mid-2015 and early 2016, Administration conducted community engagement for improved accessibility to the NMRP. After considering the concerns expressed by the community, Administration developed three feasible options to improve accessibility. These options were submitted to Council on 1 March 2016 (Item AS02-03/16), and Council approved “Option C”, which entailed the construction of a left-in access at Marathon Loop, west from Gnangara Road, and the construction of an access road from the north end of Buffalo Avenue, north to Gavranich Way, as shown in the City’s drawing no. 3128-9-0 (Attachment 2 refers)
Detail
Road Dedication of Lot 3
Option C requires the construction of an access road across Lot 3 (57L) Gnangara Road (Lot 3). The access road will become sacrificial works when Gnangara Road is re-aligned in the future.
Lot 3 is described as Lot 3 on Diagram 98587, being all the land in Certificate of Title Volume 2193 Folio 445. Lot 3 is freehold land owned by the City, and was originally acquired for the purpose of the realignment of Gnangara Road to Whitfords Avenue. Lot 3 is zoned “Other Regional Roads” under the Metropolitan Regional Scheme and the District Planning Scheme No. 2.
The construction of a road over freehold land (such as Lot 3) is unusual and may expose the City to public liability risk if the road was opened for use as a thoroughfare but remained freehold. The risk can be alleviated by dedicating the land as a public road, in which case the
City’s responsibility would be for the care, control and management of the land, as is the case with other dedicated roads reserves.
As Lot 3 is ultimately required to be dedicated in the future for the Gnangara Road realignment, Administration considers it is more practical and efficient to dedicate the whole of Lot 3 now rather than just the portion on which the access road will be constructed. The dedication of a whole freehold lot as road reserve is effected by transferring that land to the State of Western Australia (as represented by the Department of Lands (DoL)).
Condition of Lot 3
Administration’s experience is that prior to DoL accepting the transfer of Lot 3 for dedication as road reserve, DoL may request that the City also provide a statutory declaration that there are no other interests in the land and regarding the environmental condition of Lot 3.
Administration is aware of the following in relation to Lot 3:
· Following the City’s acquisition of Lot 3 in 2006, the site was leased back to its original owner and was used by a related business, WA Wheelwash & Hire Services for a vehicle wash-down business. The lease ended in late 2012. Administration has no evidence of contamination arising from the previous owner or WA Wheelwash & Hire Services.
· In February 2015 the City engaged the services of Site Environmental and Remediation Services Pty Ltd (SERS) to remove a small pile of asbestos cement fencing sheets that had been illegally dumped on Lot 3. This was carried out in accordance with applicable legislation and guidelines.
Notwithstanding that Administration is satisfied to provide a statutory declaration to DoL regarding the environmental condition of Lot 3, DoL may require further evidence, such as an environmental report, before it accepts a transfer of the land for dedication as road reserve.
Dedication of Pedestrian Accessways
Lot 3 is bounded by a 0.1 metre wide lot, being Lot 126 on Diagram 98587 and being part of the land included in Certificate of Title Volume 2193 Folio 444, along the northern boundary of Lot 3 and another 0.1 metre wide lot, being Lot 127 on Diagram 98587 and being the remainder of the land included in Certificate of Title Volume 2193 Folio 444, along the southern boundary (Lots 126 and 127) (Attachment 3 refers).
These lots are freehold registered in the name of the State of Western Australia, and function as town planning mechanisms to restrict access from adjoining properties.
Due to the location of Lots 126 and 127, Lot 3 therefore does not actually abut Buffalo Avenue and Gavranich Way. In order to construct the proposed access road, 14 metres of the western portion of Lot 127 and 17.9 metres of the western portion of Lot 126 will need to be ceded and dedicated as road.
As Lots 126 and 127 are freehold land held in the name of the State of Western Australia the City will need to request the Minister for Lands to cede these portions of the lots for dedication as road.
Consultation
The dedication of Lot 3 and portions of Lots 126 and 127 as road reserve are required to facilitate the Option 3 access proposal for the NMRP. This proposal was developed following community engagement, as noted in Council reports AS03-01/16 and AS02-03/16.
Comment
Administration recommends the dedication of Lot 3 and portions of Lots 126 and 127 as road reserve to facilitate the Option C access proposal for the NMRP.
Statutory Compliance
The ability to dedicate the whole of Lot 3 and the portions of Lot 126 and 127 as road reserve is authorised by the provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997 (LAA).
Section 56 of the LAA provides that where a local government requests the Minister for Lands to dedicate land as a road it is to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation that may arise from that action.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.3 Easy to Get Around - The community is well connected and accessible with an integrated transport approach for all.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Anticipated costs for the dedication of Lot 3 and the portions of Lots 126 and 127 as road reserve include survey costs and Landgate registration fees, and are estimated to be approximately $5,000 to $10,000. There may be an additional cost for commissioning an environmental report if required by DoL.
All costs will be funded from project PR-4025 for Construction of Access Road from Buffalo Avenue to Gavranich Way.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES, the dedication of the whole of Lot 3 (57L) Gnangara Road, Madeley (“Lot 3”) as a road under section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997;
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo, in accordance with the City’s execution of documents Policy, to the Transfer of Land and any other associated documentation relating to the dedication of Lot 3;
3. AUTHORISES a request being made to the Minister for Lands to dedicate portions of Lot 126 on Diagram 98587 and Lot 127 on Diagram 98587 as a road under section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997; and
4. INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands against any claim for compensation arising from the dedication pursuant to 1 and 4.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Location Plan - Gnangara Road & Buffalo Avenue |
16/105625 |
|
|
2. |
Marathon Loop Gnangara Road - Concept Drawing Option 3 - Number 3128-9-0 |
16/15312 |
|
|
3. |
Diagram 98587 - Showing Lots 3,126 & 127 |
16/105475 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 439
Council & Corporate Support
File Ref: 2855V02 – 16/150643
Responsible Officer: Manager Council & Corporate Support
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received four sponsorship requests, nil community donation requests and one request for a waiver of fees and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Judo Western Australia (inc) |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Fletcher Briggs, Denis Hudec, Bobby McCrone and Bianca van Rooyen |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18 years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2016 National Judo Championship, Geelong Vic, 10 – 13 June 2016 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team, up to four teams). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Judo Western Australia (inc) for the participation of Fletcher Briggs, Denis Hudec, Bobby McCrone and Bianca van Rooyen at the 2016 National Judo Championship to be held in Geelong Vic from 10 – 13 June 2016. |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s policy. |
|
Applicant 2 – High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics Academy |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
U11 Female: Alannah Boseley U13 Male: Dylan Scanlon and Pat Friend U15 Male: Josh Goodwin International Levels: Lachlan Robertson |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
Australian National Gymnastics Championships, Melbourne Vic, 31 May – 5 June 2016 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team, up to four teams). This request is for four teams. |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics Academy for the participation of U11 Female: Alannah Boseley; U13 Male: Dylan Scanlon and Pat Friend; U15 Male: Josh Goodwin and International Levels: Lachlan Robertson at the Australian National Gymnastics Championships to be held in Melbourne Vic from 31 May to 5 June 2016. |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s policy. |
|
Applicant 3 – Calisthenics Association of Western Australia |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Junior Team: Hannah Whittome; Hayley Crawforth; Tahlia Gaunt; Rachael Hutt; Stephanie Lee and Alysse Harris Intermediate Team: Siobhan Whittome |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
National Calisthenics Championships, Adelaide SA, |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team, up to four teams). This request is for two teams. |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$800.00 to the Calisthenics Association of Western Australia
for the participation of Junior Team: Hannah Whittome; Hayley Crawforth;
Tahlia Gaunt; Rachael Hutt; Stephanie Lee and Alysse Harris and Intermediate
Team: Siobhan Whittome at the National Calisthenics Championships to be held
in Adelaide SA from |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s policy. |
|
Applicant 4 – Wanneroo Giants Baseball Club |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Jay Reynolds, Tyson Caullay and Tyson Le Quesne |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
Little League National Championships, Lismore NSW, 8 – 13 June 2016 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team, up to four teams). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Baseball Club for the participation of Jay Reynolds, Tyson Caullay and Tyson Le Quesne at the Little League National Championships to be held in Lismore NSW from 8 – 13 June 2016. |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s policy. |
Community Group Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Channel 7 Telethon Trust |
|
|
Request amount |
$573.80 |
|
Description of request |
Donation to the Channel 7 Telethon Trust in the amount of the Building Permit fee for the 2016 Telethon Home at Lot 28 (77) Reflection Boulevard, Jindalee. |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Donations only |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
Registered Charity |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to the public |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Objective 2.2 – Healthy and active people – we get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle. |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Not stated |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
All donations |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
PD17-04/07 CS05-04/10 |
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Not stated |
|
Comments
The Policy does not support fund raising for generic fundraising campaigns. The Building Permit application for the home to be constructed by Residential Building WA Pty Ltd was issued on 05 April 2016. The fee retained by the City as part of the application totalled $573.80.
On 15 April 2016 Residential Building WA Pty Ltd kindly requested that the City consider donating the application fee of $573.80 towards Telethon 2016.
The Channel 7 Telethon Trust is a West Australian based, registered charitable trust that has a philosophy to financially support the medical and social welfare of children and young people, and to fund research into children’s diseases.
Since the first Telethon on Channel 7 in 1968, Telethon has raised over $204 million and provided much needed financial assistance to a significant number of charitable organisations, children’s hospitals and research/medical facilities in Western Australia.
The proceeds from the sale of the 2016 Telethon home will further contribute to the support that Telethon has been providing to children and young people throughout Western Australia.
|
|
|
Recommendation |
APPROVE a donation in the sum of $573.80 to the Channel 7 Telethon Trust towards a donation in the amount of the Building Permit fee for the 2016 Telethon Home at Lot 28 (77) Reflection Boulevard, Jindalee. |
|
Reason |
The City has previously supported this charitable trust by refunding the building permit fee to support this organisation. Whilst this donation request does not meet the criteria of the Policy, the Chief Executive Officer recommends that Council consider approving the donation based on precedence and the nature of the charitable organisation. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four teams) and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2015/2016 Additional amount approved in CS08-04/16 Revised Total |
|
$90,000.00 $20,000.00 $110,000.00 |
|
Amount expended to date:- (as at 4 May 2016) |
|
$93,140.80 |
|
Balance |
|
$16,859.20 |
|
Total of requests for this round: Donations (in this report):
Total this Round (recommended) |
$3,573.80 |
$3,573.80 |
|
BALANCE |
|
$13,285.40 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Judo Western Australia (inc) for the participation of Fletcher Briggs, Denis Hudec, Bobby McCrone and Bianca van Rooyen at the 2016 National Judo Championship to be held in Geelong Vic from 10 – 13 June 2016;
2. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics Academy for the participation of U11 Female: Alannah Boseley; U13 Male: Dylan Scanlon and Pat Friend; U15 Male: Josh Goodwin and International Levels: Lachlan Robertson at the Australian National Gymnastics Championships to be held in Melbourne Vic from 31 May to 5 June 2016;
3. APPROVES
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $800.00 to the Calisthenics
Association of Western Australia for the participation of Junior Team:
Hannah Whittome; Hayley Crawforth; Tahlia Gaunt; Rachael Hutt; Stephanie Lee
and Alysse Harris and Intermediate Team: Siobhan Whittome at the National
Calisthenics Championships to be held in Adelaide SA from
6 – 9 July 2016; and
4. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Baseball Club for the participation of Jay Reynolds, Tyson Caullay and Tyson Le Quesne at the Little League National Championships to be held in Lismore NSW from 8 – 13 June 2016; and
5. APPROVE a donation in the sum of $573.80 to the Channel 7 Telethon Trust towards a donation in the amount of the Building Permit fee for the 2016 Telethon Home at Lot 28 (77) Reflection Boulevard, Jindalee.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 17 May, 2016 445
Chief Executive Office
Item 5 Confidential Late Report (to be circulated under separate cover)
File Ref: SD151110 – 16/150515
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
File Ref: 26470 – 16/163166
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(a) a matter affecting an employee or employees
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
The next Ordinary Council Meeting has been scheduled for 7:00pm on Tuesday 24 May 2016, to be held at Council Chambers, 23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
