Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
7.00pm, 22 August 2017
Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
7.00pm, 22 August 2017
Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
PUBLIC QUESTION AND STATEMENT TIME
1. TIME PERMITTED
A minimum of 15 minutes is permitted for public questions at each Council Meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move to the next item. If there are more questions than can be considered within 15 minutes, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
2. PROTOCOLS
No member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation.
Members of the public wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting are to register on the night at the main reception desk located outside of the Chamber. Members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting (that is by noon on the day before the meeting).
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. Members of the public wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should be stated.
3. GENERAL RULES
The following general rules apply to public question and statement time:
· Questions and statements should only relate to the business of the local government and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting the local government will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered at a special meeting.
· Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific Elected Members or Employees.
· Questions are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Employee.
· First priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
· Second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
DEPUTATIONS
An informal session will be held on the same day as the Council meeting at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations relating to items on the current agenda. To present a deputation members of the public are required to submit a request for deputation in writing at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief Executive Officer. A request for a deputation must be received by Council Support by 12 noon on the Friday before the Council Meeting.
· Deputation requests must relate to items on the current agenda.
· A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
· Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber.
For further information please contact Council Support on 9405 5027.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, Electors, and Public Question Time during Council Briefing Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment, except in the case of meetings of the Council where the Council closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the recording plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the State Records Act 2000.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 22 August, 2017 commencing at 7.00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive Officer
17 August, 2017
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 3_____ Public Question Time
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-08/17 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25 July 2017
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members
Planning & Development Services
PS01-08/17 Alkimos Eglinton Developer Contribution Plan - Annual Review of Estimated Costs
PS02-08/17 Waterwise Council Endorsement for the City of Wanneroo
PS04-08/17 Submission on WALGA Discussion Paper - Third Party Appeal Rights in Planning
PS05-08/17 Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to the Approved Structure Plan No. 57
PS06-08/17 Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure
PS07-08/17 Preparation of Amendment No. 144 to District Planning Scheme No. 2
AS01-08/17 Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade, Merriwa Intersection Upgrade
AS02-08/17 Options for upgrading the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive, Carramar
AS04-08/17 State and Federal Government Black Spot Programs 2018/19 Submissions
AS05-08/17 Marmion Avenue Dualling to Yanchep - Consideration of State Government Funding
Parks & Conservation Management
AS06-08/17 PT01-05/17 Objection to the Removal of Trees on the Verge of Peaslake Street, Butler
Communication, Marketing and Events
CP03-08/17 Reconciliation Action Plan - Request for Six Month Extension
Corporate Strategy & Performance
CS01-08/17 Financial Activity Statement (Estimate) for the Period Ended 30 June 2017
CS02-08/17 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 July 2017
CS05-08/17 Donations to be Considered by Council - August 2017
CE01-08/17 Minor Amendments to Delegations
CE02-08/17 Adoption of the Parking Amendment Local Law 2017
CE03-08/17 Council Members' Code of Conduct - Complaint Procedure
MN01-08/17 Cr Brett Treby – Illegal Dumping of Waste During Bulk Waste Uplift Season
MN02-08/17 Cr Domenic Zappa – Northern Suburbs Men's Shed
CR02-08/17 Chief Executive Officer Performance Review 2016/17
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region and I invite you to bow your head in prayer:
Lord, We ask for your blessing upon our City, our community and our Council. Guide us in our decision making to act fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty. May we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to a prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25 July 2017 be confirmed.
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.
Planning & Development Services
File Ref: 23155 – 17/224770
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the annual review of cost estimates for the Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan in accordance with the provisions of Schedules 14 and 15 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS No. 2).
Background
Amendment No. 122 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 was gazetted in September 2014, and introduced the Developer Contribution Plan (DCP) provisions into DPS No. 2. The Alkimos Eglinton Development DCP Report and Cost Apportionment Schedule (refer Attachment 1) were subsequently adopted by Council in April 2015.
The DCP identifies various community infrastructure and provides estimates on the cost, estimated contributions and the timing for the delivery of infrastructure within Alkimos and Eglinton. The infrastructure costs include planning, design, project management costs, site, servicing, construction costs and land acquisition costs associated with the following infrastructure;
· Surf Life Saving Club
· Public Open Space (Active x2)
· Multipurpose Hard Courts (x2)
· Community Centre (x2)
· Library (x2)
· Indoor Recreation Centres (x2)
In accordance with Schedule 15 of DPS No. 2, the DCP has an operation period of 25 years and during this time period the City is required to review the various elements of the DCP at one and five year intervals as per the following;
Annually
· DCP Cost Estimates.
· DCP Cost Indexation.
· Contributing Land Area.
· Cost per Hectare.
5-yearly
· Community Facility Plan (CFP) Assumptions and Recommendations
· Full DCP Review.
This report is only considering the annual review requirements of the DCP to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of approved infrastructure.
Detail
2017 – Annual Review
The following provides the outcomes of each element of the annual review. The Contribution Cost amount is calculated by estimating the total cost of the facilities (including Administration costs) then subtracting any contributions received and interest generated on the scheme accounts. The remaining estimated cost is then apportioned over the remaining net contributing area. The salient figures of the review completed in May 2017, include;
1. Contributions received (including May 2017) - $10,582,868
2. Interest Generated - $757,948
3. Net Contributing Area (NCA) – Reduced from 630.56 hectares to 621.66 hectares. In this regard it should be noted that the City has actually recorded approximately 20 hectares of development since the adoption of the DCP in 2015, which does not align with the above NCA reduction (which only depicts 8.9 hectares reduction). This variation is primarily due to changes in the land use planning within the DCP area, which includes MRS Regional Reserve Amendments, Structure Plan Amendments and other factors affecting the NCA within the DCP.
4. In accordance with Clause 11.3 of Schedule 14 of DPS No. 2 “The local government is to have such estimated costs independently certified by appropriate qualified persons and must provide such independent certification to an owner when requested to do so”. These documents have been attached to this memorandum (refer Attachments 2 and 3). The following points highlight the salient costs that form part of the review, including construction cost estimates provided by an independent quantity surveyor and valuer.
· All Costs - Estimates shall include the best and latest information available to the local government, until the expenditure on the relevant item of infrastructure or administrative costs has occurred. In this regard, the City engaged Donald Cant Watts and Corke (DCWC) to provide updated information on the facility costs, which has resulted in a reduction in the total cost of the facilities from $75,951,039 to $72,367,400 which is generally reflective of more competitive pricing for construction in the current market (refer DCWC Report – Attachment 2).
· Land Acquisition - Estimates are required in accordance with Part 12 of Schedule 14 of DPS No. 2. The City engaged Brian Zucal and Associates and the valuation recommends a reduction from $130 per m2 (2015) to $101 per m2 (refer Attachment 3). In accordance with Clause 12.2, if an owner objects to a valuation made by the valuer, the owner may give notice to the local government requesting a review of the amount of the value. In this regard, Woodsome Management (on behalf of the landowner group) has confirmed that – “The AELOs agree to the reduction in land values based on the most recent land valuations (Brian Zucal & Associates March 2017)”.
The following table (also included as Attachment 4) includes a comparison of the previously adopted DCP costs and the revised costs along with the percentage change occurring. It should be noted that the ‘Total Cost’ is calculated by adding the estimated Administrative Costs to the revised cost estimates and then deducting total income (and interest). Overall this equates to a reducing DCP liability from $70,059,376 to $61,986,048 (since 2015).
Approval Process
In accordance with Clause 11.4 of DPS No. 2 “The local government's review of estimated costs, carried out in accordance with clause 11.2 (cost review), shall recommend that the estimated costs are to be:
(a) maintained;
(b) reduced; or
(c) increased”.
In this instance, Administration is recommending that the 2017 estimated costs be adopted and the contribution rate of $111,106.60 per hectare ($11.11 per/m2) be ‘reduced’ to a contribution rate of $99,710.53 per hectare ($9.97 per/m2).
Consultation
In accordance with Clauses 11.5 of Schedule 14;
“11.5 - Where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be maintained or reduced, pursuant to clauses 11.4(a) or (b), then the local government shall decide to either maintain or reduce the estimated costs and shall notify owners of its decision”.
The estimated costs have (overall) reduced and therefore consultation with affected landowners is not required. However, in the interest of open and transparent governance it was seen to be appropriate to engage with the landowners representative (Woodsome Management) in the preparation and formulation of the cost reviews. Woodsome Management has provided the following comments in relation to the revised cost estimates;
1. The AELOs agree to the reduction in land values based on the most recent land valuations (Brian Zucal & Associates March 2017);
2. The AELOs confirm their preference is to apply the new DCP rate (circa $100k / hectare) as a result of the annual review; and
3. The AELOs confirm that they have been consulted through this annual review and further confirm that from their stand - point there is no need for a formal Advisory Committee meeting.
Alkimos Eglinton DCP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
The Alkimos Eglinton DCP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting ‘Terms of Reference’ require that the Committee shall meet at least three times a year, or ‘as determined by the nominated committee members’. The last landowner meeting was held on 3 August 2016, however, all committee members have confirmed that there is no current need for the committee to meet.
Comment
The purpose of the annual DCP review process is to ensure that sufficient funds continue to be collected from developing landowners to meet the cost of delivering these facilities. Administration has worked with landowner’s representatives through the annual DCP review process and whilst formal consultation is not required under Clause 11.5 of Schedule 15, the landowners have provided their overall acceptance of the cost estimates. Should Council adopt the revised cost contribution amount, it will have immediate effect and will be applied to all future subdivision and development that is required to make contributions in accordance with the Alkimos Eglinton DCP. The adopted costs will remain in place until the next annual review, or until such time as Administration considers it to be necessary to revise the cost estimates for the DCP, as a result of any other factor.
Changes in Priorities and Infrastructure Timing
The timing for facility provision within the Alkimos Eglinton and Yanchep Two Rocks areas was established through the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor Community Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP identifies facilities based on a facility hierarchy, which was developed to meet the ultimate needs of the communities based on population and demographic projections.
Administration has received numerous requests from the landowners to consider the early provision of the Eglinton North Indoor Recreation Centre (ENIRC), which is identified in the DCP as not being required until 2032/33. The requests have been premised on the likely delay in land availability for other DCP funded projects, the establishment of a temporary surf lifesaving facility in Alkimos and potential changes to population projections and land releases across the DCP. At this stage there is inadequate information to consider any re-prioritisation of facilities identified in the Capital Expenditure Plan (CEP) of the DCP as listed in the table below.
Capital Expenditure Plan (included in DCP 2015)
Whilst this report is only considering the revised cost estimates, the DCP requires the review of assumptions and recommendations every five years (next review scheduled for 2020). Initial discussions and requests from the landowner group suggests that a more holistic and flexible approach is required to allow the re-prioritisation (timing) of the infrastructure. At this stage, the landowners are working with Administration to investigate the suitability of re-prioritising the infrastructure ahead of the five year review. The landowners request will be premised on revised population projections for the DCP, which will include the latest (soon to be released) ID forecasts, however more information associated with a feasibility/needs analysis, the objectives of the Community Facility Plan (CFP) and DCP funding implications will be required. It is anticipated that further investigation will occur throughout the year and formal consideration being presented to Council in due course on this matter.
Delegation to Approve Revised Costings (For information Only)
At this stage there is no specific delegation that enables Administration to determine the revised cost estimates for a DCP. This is somewhat unusual given the scheme provisions do not require consultation with affected landowners when the cost estimates either remain the same or are reduced. In accordance with Clauses 11.5 of Schedule 14;
“11.5 - Where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be maintained or reduced, pursuant to clauses 11.4(a) or (b), then the local government shall decide to either maintain or reduce the estimated costs and shall notify owners of its decision”.
Administration will consider seeking delegation for determining revised DCP cost estimates to ensure the annual review of the City’s developer contribution schemes can occur in a more timely and efficient manner.
Yanchep Two Rocks DCP Update
It is anticipated that a review of the other community infrastructure DCP for the Northern Growth Corridor (Yanchep Two Rocks - YTR) will be presented to Council towards the end of this year. The YTR DCP will require a significantly more complex review to incorporate current and forecast market trends for lot creation (which determines DCP income) to ensure adequate funds will be received to meet the actual costs of delivering the infrastructure over the 10 year operational period of the DCP. Construction of the Yanchep District Open Space and Surf Lifesaving Club will be completed shortly and the cost of these works will be included into the DCP review along with recommendations of Administration and the Yanchep Two Rocks Technical Advisory Committee.
Statutory Compliance
The annual review of the Alkimos Eglinton Cost Estimates has been completed in accordance with Part 11 of Schedule 14 of DPS No. 2, which will bring the DCP into compliance with its annual review requirements.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The annual review of the DCP assists in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning (LTFP) as it ensures that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships applies as a key element in the DCP review process is maintaining effective engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Further consideration and review of the community facilities timing will occur in due course. Any variations to the current priorities identified in the DCP’s Capital Expenditure Plan will have potential implications on community facility operational budgets, project management, the capital works programme and DCP funding opportunities.
The landowner group has been requested to provide an initial scoping document to enable Administration to fully consider the financial implications associated with the re-prioritising of any identified infrastructure.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES the Revised Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan Cost Estimates in accordance with Clause 11.4 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 as defined in Attachment 4, including:
1. DCP Cost Estimates - $72,367,400
2. DCP Cost Indexation – As reported in the cost estimates
3. Contributing Land Area - 621.66 hectares
4. Cost per Hectare - $99,710.53 (or $9.97 m2)
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Alkimos Eglinton DCP Report 2015 |
17/166678 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Facility Cost Estimates 2017 |
17/228999 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Valuation 2017 |
17/229028 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - 2017 - Revised DCP Cost Estimates for Alkimos Eglinton |
17/225133 |
Minuted |
City Growth
File Ref: 6903 – 17/225612
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a proposal to participate in the Water Corporation’s Waterwise Council Endorsement program.
Background
The Water Corporation and the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation launched the Waterwise Council Program in 2009 to build a cooperative working relationship with local governments to improve water use efficiency in local government and their communities. The Waterwise Council Program is free to join and is open to all Councils within Western Australia. There are currently 22 Councils in the Perth Metropolitan Region endorsed under the program.
The City has previously partnered with the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation to prepare the North West Corridor Water Supply Strategy, which was underpinned by changes in the City’s approach to landscaping and irrigation design. The City is progressively upgrading its older irrigation systems at its established parks to reflect hydrozoning principles and has developed a plan to install 35-40 Evapotranspiration Sensors by late 2017 to further improve water efficiency. In addition to watering practises, the City is in the early stages of making improvements to its older buildings in the area of water efficiency. Any equipment replaced is being exchanged with higher standard WELS rated products, where available.
Detail
There are 4 main steps to fulfilling endorsement as a Waterwise Council:
1. Commitment.
1.1 The Mayor signs a Memorandum of Understanding confirming the Council’s commitment to participate in the Waterwise Council Program. The Water Corporation supplies a standard MOU template for this purpose (refer Attachment 1).
1.2 An employee is nominated as a point of contact for the Program and an internal water management team is established.
It is expected that co-ordination of the program would sit within the Strategic Land Use Planning Service Unit due to its strategic focus. The water management team is expected to comprise staff who work on water management activities across the City (including representatives from Strategic Land Use Planning, Land Development, Parks and Conservation Maintenance, and Strategic Asset Management).
2. Review City water consumption and create a water efficiency action plan for potable and non-potable water sources for all City operations and the community.
2.1 Review the City’s water consumption over the last 3 years and identify the top water using buildings and grounds owned or managed by the City.
This requirement aligns with an action of the Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy (which was endorsed by Council in July 2016) to undertake a comprehensive assessment of water usage within City buildings and surrounds and identify key areas for savings. Project scoping is planned to be undertaken by the Strategic Asset Management service unit in the 2017/18 financial year with a view to listing funds for consideration as part of the 2018/19 budget process. Smaller community facilities can be audited by staff who have completed the relevant online training through the Waterwise program.
2.2 Set goals to improve water efficiency. For example, a suggested goal may be:
The City aims to achieve a percentage reduction in water consumption (per capita population) based on 2015/16 consumption data by 2019 and ensure no net increase in consumption over the same period, based on current developments within the City.
2.3 Establish a water efficiency action plan that outlines current and future actions to meet water efficiency goals.
It is anticipated that this work would be led by the City’s Strategic Land Use Planning Service Unit and developed by the water management team.
3. Ensure that appropriate staff members complete free waterwise training.
All relevant staff involved in water management would be required to complete a range of on-line training modules, involving 2-3 modules with an estimated time commitment of 3-4 hours in total every four years. This would include all relevant staff employed during the City’s participation in the program. The training modules are relevant for some of the City’s building and facility management, parks and maintenance, and customer service staff. The modules relate to the principles of waterwise landscaping, irrigation and water use auditing. The relevant manager would determine which staff members would need to undertake this training.
4. No breaches of groundwater license terms or conditions set by the Department of Water, and no breaches of scheme water usage issued by Water Corporation in the past 12 months.
The City already meets this requirement.
Once all the above criteria have been met, the City will be eligible to be endorsed as Waterwise. Once endorsed, the City must continue to report annually to the Water Corporation to be able to retain its Waterwise status, which includes use of the program logo and promotional material.
Consultation
Representatives from Strategic Land Use Planning, Parks and Conservation Maintenance and Strategic Asset Management met with the Water Corporation in September 2016 to discuss the Council’s potential involvement in the program. The Water Corporation advised that the City is already an industry leader in Waterwise development and it made sense for the City to join the program to obtain the benefits of marketing itself as Waterwise.
Comment
There are a number of benefits to becoming a Waterwise Council, including:
· A better understanding of water use in the City’s operations and the community;
· Potential water and financial savings through improved efficiency;
· Access to free Waterwise training for staff;
· Access to Waterwise materials to promote water conservation to the community;
· Access to Waterwise Council branding to promote the Council as a sustainable water manager;
· Opportunities to participate in funded and co-funded water efficiency initiatives (e.g. the Waterwise verge incentive scheme whereby the Water Corporation will match any funding spent by the City on Waterwise verges up to $10,000 per Council per year); and
· Water Corporation to provide access to services such as data logging free of charge.
Given that the City is already progressing many of the requirements of program, it is considered beneficial to work towards becoming formally accredited to allow the City to better market these initiatives under the Waterwise banner. Funds towards implementing this program will be considered as part of the 2018/19 budget process.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.1 Resource Management
3.1.3 Proactively manage the scarcity of water through sustainable local water management strategies”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Climate Change |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
As there may be a requirement to upgrade to more water efficient fixtures in the future, the City’s Purchasing Policy will be a relevant policy.
Financial Implications
There are budget implications to complete the minimum actions required for Waterwise Council endorsement.
The major cost associated with this program relates to the water auditing of high water using sites. This is estimated at approximately $3,000 to $4,000 per site, in addition to any costs associated with implementing any viable recommendations that arise from the water audits. More accurate cost implications will be determined through project scoping work planned to be undertaken by the Strategic Asset Management Service Unit in the 2017/18 financial year with a view to listing funds for consideration as part of the 2018/19 budget process. As mentioned previously, Council has already committed to these works through its endorsement of the Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy.
In addition to the above, there are in-kind staffing costs associated with:
· Co-ordinating the program and completing the reporting requirements. This is proposed to be managed by the City’s Sustainability Officer within;
· Time for appropriate staff to complete water efficiency training (training is free, with a time commitment of 3-4 hours every 4 years); and,
· Staff time for the completion of water monitoring activities within the Strategic Asset Management Service Unit.
It is difficult to quantify the exact total cost of program participation. However, it is anticipated that any costs associated with the Council gaining Waterwise Council endorsement would be able to be recouped over time through savings in water consumption and associated costs.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES participation by the City of Wanneroo in the Water Corporation Waterwise Council Program; and
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor to sign the Attached Waterwise Council Program Memorandum of Understanding.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Waterwise Council Memorandum of Understanding Template |
17/213433 |
Minuted |
Approval Services
PS03-08/17 Consideration of Retrospective Development Application for Place of Worship and Additions (Enclosed Patio, Patio Extensions and Carport Extension) at Lots 443 and 444 (32 and 34) Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen (DA2017/203)
File Ref: DA2017/203 – 17/224604
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a development application (DA2017/203) seeking retrospective approval for a Change of Use to a Place of Worship and Additions (Enclosed Patio, Patio Extensions and Carport Extension) at Lots 443 and 444 (32 and 34) Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen (subject site).
|
Applicant |
Duoc Huynh |
|
Owner |
Nuh Son Hua, Duoc Van Huynh and Hoang Chan Vo |
|
Location |
Lots 444 (32) and 443 (34) Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen |
|
Site Area |
1,422m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential R20/40 |
Background
On 11 December 2016, Administration received a request on behalf of the landowners to utilise Bardsley Park for overflow car parking for an event being held on the subject site. Whilst permission was given for the use of Bardsley Park, it was noted that a development application is required to be submitted to the City to change the use of the subject site from Single House to Place of Worship.
Subsequently, Administration contacted the landowners of 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen and advised that, should the landowners wish to continue operating the Place of Worship from the subject site, then a development application will need to be submitted to the City to seek retrospective planning approval. This approach is consistent with the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.14 – Compliance (LPP 4.14).
It is noted that a retrospective development application incurs a fee of three times that of a standard development application. This increased fee is considered to encompass the processing fee of the development application and a penalty for developing without the required approvals first being obtained from the City.
On 16 February 2017, the City received a development application for a Change of Use to a Place of Worship at the subject site. However, it is Administration’s understanding, that the subject site has been operating for a number of years. Furthermore, the City has no record of any complaints regarding the operations of the subject site. A location plan of the subject site is included in Attachment 1.
On 20 June 2017, the application was presented to Council at a Briefing Session. The application was withdrawn to allow Administration to undertake an investigation to determine if the extensions to the original building were authorised structures. A site visit conducted by Administration has confirmed that some structures on-site are unauthorised. In light of this, the applicant was required to submit plans for these structures which now form part of this application and are discussed in further detail below.
Detail
The development application proposes a Change of Use to a Place of Worship which is an ‘A’ use, meaning it is discretionary subject to advertising, in the Residential zone. The details of the development are as follows:
· A Place of Worship to operate from the existing dwellings on the subject site as follows:
o A caretaker to attend the site every day to undertake maintenance, general cleaning and maintain the garden;
o A praying session on the first day and in the middle of the Lunar month;
o Saturday prayer session and a children’s class.
· Additions to the Place of Worship as follows:
o An enclosed patio that is 4.1m in width, 10.8m in length, 2.4m in height and has a total area of 32.7m2, at 32 Bardsley Avenue;
o An extension to the existing patio that is 6.8m wide, 4.1m in length and 2.4m in height, at 32 Bardsley Avenue;
o An extension to the existing patio that is 6.3m wide, 5.1m in length and 2.4m in height, at 34 Bardsley Avenue; and
o An extension to the existing carport that 4.4m in width, 5.8m in length, has a wall height of 2.2m and a top of roof height of 3.0m, at 34 Bardsley Avenue.
· Operating hours as follows:
o Monday to Sunday from 10:00am to 8:00pm with a maximum number of 12 patrons; and
o 3 religious events per year with a maximum of 30 patrons.
Plans depicting the proposal are included as Attachment 2.
Upon assessment of the development application it was determined that the proposal is generally complaint with the provisions of the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) with the exception of:
· Car parking when events are held (three times a year);
· Landscaping;
· Reduced setbacks to adjoining residential properties.
Consultation
Advertising of the proposal was undertaken by the City in writing to the affected landowners adjoining the subject site and a notice placed on the City’s website. Advertising was undertaken for a period of 25 days, commencing on 7 April 2017 to 2 May 2017. The advertising period was extended from the typical 21 day period as there were a number of public holidays such as Easter and Anzac Day in April. One submission was received, from an anonymous submitter, which objected to the proposal. The objection raised the following issues:
· The proposal will add traffic congestion to the area;
· Questions the number of people attending; and
· Believes there are other areas appropriate for such a use.
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of the application is provided in the Comment section below.
Comment
The following issues have been identified as part of the assessment of the proposal.
Car Parking
Pursuant to Part 4 of DPS 2 a Place of Worship is required to provide one car parking bay for every four people accommodated. Given the maximum number of 12 attendees, the proposal is required to have three car parking bays. 32 Bardsley Avenue has a double garage and sufficient space to park two more vehicles in front of the garage and behind the street setback area. 34 Bardsley Avenue has sufficient space for two vehicles to park behind the street setback area thus, resulting in a total of six bays across the two lots. Furthermore, the front of the properties has been paved which will allow for additional car parking if required. This satisfies the car parking requirements of DPS 2.
It is noted that when the Place of Worship hosts its religious celebrations (three times a year) the applicant/landowner has previously and will continue to book Bardsley Park for overflow car parking. This has alleviated the potential for traffic congestion in the area and is considered to be an appropriate strategy to mitigate any future car parking issues when events are held. In order to ensure this it is recommended that a condition be imposed on any approval which may be granted as follows:
All car parking shall be contained on-site. The applicant/landowner shall ensure that suitable arrangements for overflow car parking are in place when more than 12 patrons are accommodated.
The above condition will ensure that overflow car parking will be catered for and that all car parking is contained on-site and thus, avoiding parking on verges and obstruction of roads and pathways.
Traffic
The objection received raised concerns regarding potential traffic congestion as a result of the development.
In accordance with the Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) Transport Impact Assessment Guidelines (Guidelines) the applicant did not submit nor were they required to submit a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA). This is because the WAPC Guidelines only require a TIS or TIA to be prepared and submitted when a proposed use generates traffic that exceeds a specified number of vehicle trips per day. Though a Place of Worship is not a use specifically identified in the WAPC Guidelines, it does include a specified standard applicable for ‘entertainment venues’. It is considered that this standard is appropriate to be used to determine whether or not a TIS or TIA is required for a Place of Worship. For an entertainment venue, a TIS is required where the development is proposed to cater between 100 to 1000 people. Given that the proposed Place of Worship caters for a maximum of 12 patrons, it is considered that a TIS is not required.
Notwithstanding the above, Administration has reviewed the anticipated traffic volumes on Bardsley Avenue. Whilst Administration does not have traffic counts for Bardsley Avenue, an indicative calculation has been undertaken for the dwellings gaining direct access from Bardsley Avenue and developments which are likely to use Bardsley Avenue such as dwellings located on Bures Court and Gameson Way (refer to Attachment 1). The traffic calculations are based on the WAPC’s Transport Impact Assessment Guidelines whereby, it is assumed that a single dwelling will generate up to eight (8) vehicle trips per day (VTPD). The estimated vtpd for Bardsley Avenue is captured in the table below.
|
Road Classification |
Road Name |
WAPC Liveable Neighbourhoods Indicative Volume (VTPD) |
Estimated VTPD |
Total Predicted VTPD (Including Proposed Development) |
|
Access Road |
Bardsley Avenue |
3,000vtpd |
712 |
760 |
The above table indicates that Bardsley Avenue is currently operating in accordance with its classification of an Access Road. It is estimated that the proposed development will generate a maximum of 48 vtpd, this does not include the religious events hosted three times per year. This is based on a maximum number of four vehicle trips per day per patron. Therefore, it is considered that the increased traffic as a result of the development can be accommodated within the existing access road.
In addition to the above, a search of the City’s records has indicated that there have been no previous complaints regarding traffic associated with the subject site.
Acceptability of Use
The objection received raised a concern regarding the use and believed there are more appropriate areas for such a use.
The use is considered to be acceptable in this location for the following reasons:
· The proposal incorporates a maximum of 12 patrons at any one time with the exception of the three religious holidays per year and is therefore considered to be a low scale development;
· There are no proposed modifications to the façade of the existing dwellings and therefore, the development will be in keeping with the residential locality; and
· The Place of Worship is considered to provide a compatible urban support service in accordance with objective d) of the Residential Zone as discussed in Part 3 of DPS 2.
It is noted that this Place of Worship has been in operation for a number of years and although there has been no approval issued, Administration has not received any complaints in regards to the development.
A Place of Worship under DPS 2 is an ‘A’ use meaning:
A use class that is not permitted unless the Council has exercised its discretion and has granted development approval after giving notice in accordance with Clause 64 of the deemed provisions.
Notice of the application in accordance with Clause 64 of the Deemed Provisions was given as discussed in the Consultation section above. Furthermore, the application is generally compliant with the requirements of the general development standards contained in Part 4 of DPS 2 with the exception of landscaping which is discussed below.
Landscaping
As part of Administration’s assessment of the proposal it was noted that the application did not incorporate any landscaping plans for the subject site. A site visit undertaken by Administration showed that there is a considerable amount of landscaping in the setback area of the subject site (refer to photographs in Attachment 3). However, the road verge is not landscaped and has been paved.
In accordance the with City’s Nature Strip (Verge) Treatment Guidelines, where a footpath has been installed to a nature strip then hardstands may only be laid between the kerb and footpath. As can be seen from the photographs in Attachment 3, hardstand has been laid from the footpath to the boundary line and this is not supported. In this regard, Administration recommends the planting of one street tree per lot in a central location between the property boundary and the existing footpath. Furthermore, Administration recommends that detailed landscaping and reticulation plans are submitted for the subject site. The addition of street trees and landscaping within the road verge will serve to soften the hardstand area as well as contributing positively to the streetscape.
Notwithstanding the above, the verge area between the footpath and the property boundary exceeds the area which is permitted to be paved in accordance the with City’s Nature Strip (Verge) Treatment Guidelines. This matter will be further investigated by Administration and any action necessary will be undertaken to rectify the issue.
Setback of Structures
Clause 4.7.3 of DPS 2 requires a 3.0m side and rear boundary setback for non-residential developments which abut Residential zoned lots. The subject site abuts Residential zoned lots to the north, south and west. The proposal incorporates variations to Clause 4.7.3 of DPS 2 as discussed below.
32 Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen
There are two structures present at 32 Bardsley Avenue, which do not currently have development approval namely:
· An enclosed patio (noted on the plans and referred to as Structure A) that is 4.1m in width, 10.8m in length, 2.4m in height and has a total area of 32.7m2. Structure A is setback 2.0m and 1.0m from the western and southern boundaries respectively; and
· An extension to the existing patio (noted on the plans and referred to as Structure B) that is 6.87m wide, 4.10m in length and 2.4m in height. Structure B is setback 0.9m and 1.45 from the western and northern boundaries respectively.
34 Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen
· An extension to the patio (noted on the plans and referred to as Structure C) that is 6.3m wide, 5.10m in length and 2.4m in height. Structure C is setback 10.6m from the western boundary, 6.3m from the northern boundary, 7.9m from the southern boundary and 21m from the eastern boundary. Structure C complies with all of the requirements of Part 4 of DPS 2; and
· A carport extension (noted on the plans and referred to as Structure D) that is 4.4m in width, 5.8m in length, has a 2.2m wall height, 3.0m top of roof height and is setback 0.9m from the northernmost boundary.
Structures A, B and D, do not comply with the setback requirements of Clause 4.7.3 of DPS 2.
The subject site and the adjoining properties are separated by a 1.8m high fence (as confirmed through a site visit). Given that Structures A and B have a height of 2.4m, a total of 0.6m will protrude above the fence line. This is considered to be minor and will have a negligible impact on the adjoining landowners.
Structure D, has a wall height of 2.2m and therefore, a total of 0.4m will protrude above the fence line. Furthermore, Structure D is an open structure. Therefore, it is considered that Structure D will have a negligible impact on the adjoining landowners.
It is considered that all of the abovementioned structures have a negligible impact on the adjoining landowners and are therefore, supported.
Compliance
As noted in the Background section of this report, the application is seeking retrospective approval and the applicant has been required to pay a fee three times that of a standard application fee to penalise the landowners for the unauthorised development. Notwithstanding, LPP 4.14 provides discretion for Administration to take further compliance action such as prosecution, after development approval has been granted by the City for any retrospective development.
LPP 4.14 does not prescribe specific criteria for when further prosecution for a retrospective development should be undertaken following approval being sought. However, it is considered that in this instance prosecution should not be undertaken for the following reasons:
· The operations of the subject site have been on-going for a number of years and Administration does not have any complaints regarding the Place of Worship;
· The Place of Worship does not generate significant traffic throughout the locality (as discussed above) and therefore, has a negligible impact;
· The Place of Worship incorporates a maximum of 12 patrons at any one time with the exception of the three religious holidays per year and is therefore considered to be a low scale development; and
· The Place of Worship does not detract from the residential amenity of the streetscape.
In light of the above, it is recommended that the no further prosecution is undertaken by Administration should approval be granted.
Conclusion
The proposed Place of Worship at 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen is considered to be generally consistent with the provisions of Part 4 of DPS 2.
The objection received raised issues relating to traffic and appropriateness of the use. It is considered that the development will not and has not resulted in significant traffic impacts. Furthermore, the subject site can cater for car parking and the applicant has previously made arrangements for overflow car parking when required. The proposal does not propose any modifications to the existing façade and is of a relatively low intensity and therefore, will be in keeping with the residential context of the locality.
Administration recommends that Council approve the proposed Place of Worship at 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen subject to the conditions outlined below.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.4 Connected Communities
1.4.3 Build strong communities through the strength of cultural and heritage diversity”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
This proposal has been assessed against the provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.14 – Compliance.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 APPROVES the Development Application for a Change of Use to Place of Worship and Additions (Enclosed Patio, Patio Extensions and Carport Extension) at Lots 443 and 444 (32 and 34) Bardsley Avenue, Girrawheen, as shown in Attachment 2, subject to the following conditions:
a) The use of the development subject to this approval shall only be for the purpose of a “Place of Worship”. A “Place of Worship” as defined in the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 as follows:
“Place of Worship: includes buildings used primarily for the religious activities of a church, but does not include an institution for primary, secondary or higher education or a residential training institution.”
b) Stormwater and any other water runoff from buildings or paved areas shall be collected and contained on site;
c) A maximum of 12 patrons are permitted within the Place of Worship buildings at any one time with the exception of the 3 religious events per year whereby the maximum number of patrons is 30;
d) The operating hours of the Place of Worship shall be restricted to Monday to Sunday 10:00am to 8:00pm;
e) All car parking shall be contained on-site. The applicant/landowner shall ensure that suitable arrangements for overflow car parking are in place when more than 12 patrons are accommodated;
f) The landowner/applicant shall plant one street tree per site in a central location between the property boundary and the existing footpath, to the satisfaction of the Manager Land Development;
g) Detailed landscaping and reticulation plans, for the subject site and adjacent road verges, shall be lodged for approval by the City within 60 days of this approval. Planting and installation shall be completed within 30 days of the approval and shall be in accordance with the approved landscaping and reticulation plans; and
h) This approval is only valid from the date of this decision and does not retrospectively authorise any previous unapproved development on the subject site.
2. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
3. INSTRUCTS Administration that no further compliance action or prosecution is required for the retrospective Place of Worship.
4. INSTRUCTS Administration to investigate the hardstand paved area within the road verge and undertaken any necessary compliance action.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1: Location plan 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue Girrawheen |
17/185569 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2: Development Plan 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue Girrawheen(2) |
17/182580 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3: Girrawheen site visit photos DA2017 203 - 32 and 34 Bardsley Avenue Girrawheen(2) |
17/182578 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 63
File Ref: 30042 – 17/211853
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To provide a submission to the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) on the ‘Third Party Appeal Rights in Planning’ Discussion Paper (Discussion Paper), which WALGA has released for public comment.
Background
In October 2007, Dr Janet Woollard MLA sought feedback from all local governments in Western Australia on a Private Members Bill that Dr Woollard had drafted regarding Third Party Appeals.
WALGA considered this matter at its February 2008 State Council Meeting, and resolved (in part) that there is no justification for the proposed legislation and there are significant negative implications for Local Government, industry and the community, Local Government continues to be opposed to the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights in Western Australia.
The main arguments that formed WALGA’s Policy position at that time were as follows:
1. The current strategic and statutory planning processes, and consideration of applications by Councils, already takes into account the views of affected parties and the community generally;
2. Third Party Appeals could be lodged because of vexatious or commercial interests, not because of genuine planning matters;
3. Such appeals would cause significant delays and additional costs for development, as even lodgement of an appeal would put a development on hold; and
4. Additional planning appeals would place a further burden on already stretched Local Government resources. Local Governments would incur additional costs for new administrative steps in processing development applications, preparing for and responding to appeals lodged with the State Administrative Appeals Tribunal (SAT) and legal representation. This is particularly the case since the establishment of the State Administrative Tribunal which has seen planning appeals become more legalistic, costly and resource intensive for Local Governments.
Administration also responded to Dr Woollard on 19 February 2008 on behalf of the City by advising that Council (through its representation in WALGA’s North Metro Zone) was supportive of WALGA’s resolution made on the matter at the time. A copy of that correspondence is included as Attachment 1. The matter was not presented to a Council Meeting at the time.
Since WALGA established its Policy position above, a number of changes have been implemented to the planning framework which has directly impacted the decision-making powers of local government. These changes include:
· Changes to the structure planning process;
· The introduction of Development Assessment Panels (DAPs); and
· The introduction of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, which include the “Deemed Provisions” for local planning schemes.
Influenced by reforms to the planning framework in recent years, WALGA has recently resolved to undertake research on Third Party Appeals around Australia and further consult with members regarding its current Policy position. Upon completion of consultation, WALGA will prepare a report to be presented at the upcoming WALGA State Council.
Administration is proposing that the City prepare a submission to WALGA on the Discussion Paper. WALGA requested comment on the Discussion Paper by 14 July 2017. Although the due date for submissions has passed, WALGA has advised Administration that a late submission will be accepted, provided that the City’s submission is lodged immediately after this Council Meeting.
Detail
The Discussion Paper is included as Attachment 2. WALGA has advised that it welcomes feedback and comment on all aspects of the Discussion Paper, and in particular on the following:
· Would you be in favour of the introduction of some form of Third Party Appeal Rights in Western Australia? Why or why not?
· Do you feel your Council is likely to support some form of Third Party Appeal Right?
· Any other comments relating to Third Party Appeal Rights.
The Discussion Paper has been prepared by WALGA and not by State Government. The previous State Government, through its 2015 review of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011, reiterated its 2009 position that there were no plans to introduce Third Party Appeal Rights in Western Australia.
Consultation
Administration presented the Discussion Paper to Elected Members at the 13 June 2017 and 1 August 2017 Council Forums. Following these meetings, Administration has considered the matters raised at the Forums and provides further comment on how Third Party Appeal Rights function in other states, the current rights for residents to object and appeal, and under which circumstances would the City support Third Party Appeal Rights.
Comment
Third Party Appeal Rights in other States
Third Party Appeal Rights are currently in place in all other states and territories, as outlined in pages 6-7 of the WALGA Discussion Paper included in Attachment 2.
The extent and circumstances that a third party can appeal a planning decision varies considerably between each state and territory. Any of the Third Party Appeal Rights that apply in other states or territories could potentially be replicated in Western Australia if legislation was introduced. Administration has provided its own table with comment on Third Party Appeal Rights that exist in each state and territory in Attachment 3.
Third Party Appeal Rights have also been embedded into planning or local government legislation in other states and territories for some time, and have become a part of their planning frameworks. Planning reform undertaken in Western Australia in recent years was made following the conclusion that the planning regime around appeals was appropriate; with planning reform then established around this position accordingly. Should legislation allowing Third Party Appeal Rights be introduced now, it could result in the changing or ‘reversing’ of the planning reforms that have been recently made by the State Government. In a 2015 Report released by the then State Government on the legislation relating to DAPs, it was noted that:
“the Government does not believe that the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights in Western Australia is consistent with the current attempts to simplify and streamline the planning approval process”
Local Government as a Third Party Appellant
A local government is a body that either makes a planning decision or provides a recommendation to facilitate a planning decision made by others (typically a DAP or the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)). Administration considers that:
· Local government has ample opportunity to consider all the planning issues prior to determining a planning proposal;
· If a planning proposal is to be determined by others (a DAP or the WAPC), local government has ample opportunity to identify and present the planning issues to these determining bodies, prior to a decision being made; and
· If a local government were appealing planning decisions (that, a DAP or the WAPC may have made), the community may lose confidence in its local government’s ability to assess a proposal prior to formulating its determination or recommendation.
Administration considers that it would be inappropriate for local government to be a third party appellant of a planning decision – even a decision made by a DAP or the WAPC.
Current Rights for Third Parties
Prior to a decision-maker determining a planning proposal, community involvement on a planning proposal is invited through consultation processes with affected landowners and occupiers. Particularly in the case with development applications determined by the City, the City (as decision-maker) is required under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 Deemed Provisions to have due regard to the content of submissions that it receives.
In forming its current position, it was acknowledged by WALGA that the SAT system provides the following ways in which third parties may participate in SAT proceedings as follows:
· Being called as a witness by the respondent;
· Making a submission under section 242 of the Planning and Development Act 2005;
· Intervening under Section 37(3) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, whereby the third party acquires rights and responsibilities as a party under the act; and
· Possible participation in mediation.
Application and Arguments in Discussion Paper regarding Third Party Appeal Rights
WALGA has not stated what circumstances Third Party Appeal Rights should apply or other details on how this can be implemented.
The key arguments presented in the Discussion Paper against Third Party Appeal Rights include:
1. Third Party Appeal Rights, if not clearly defined, may allow individuals to take part in planning decisions in which they have no direct or legitimate interest. This may result in appeals lodged against a proposal on non-planning grounds (vexatious reasons or reasons of commercial interest) – rather than because of an issue concerning the merit or substance of a proposal.
2. There are already opportunities for community members to participate in the planning process (consultation of planning proposals), which informs decision-making.
3. Third Party Appeal Rights could result in increased delays and costs in undertaking development; which will create inefficiencies and uncertainty in the industry.
Key arguments presented in the Discussion Paper for Third Party Appeal Rights include:
1. Neighbouring landowners and occupiers have an interest in what is being proposed. Whilst the developer can appeal any decision of Council, it could be argued that residents too should be afforded the right to appeal a decision.
2. Third party appeal rights may encourage developers to become more engaged with the local community, which may place pressure on developers to concede or improve on design elements.
WALGA’s Discussion Paper (Attachment 2) presents all the arguments both for and against third party appeal rights in detail.
Administration Opinion and Recommendation on Third Party Appeal Rights
Administration acknowledges that there are reasons for and against the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights. However on balance, Administration does not support the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights in Western Australia. Administration considers that although there have been significant reforms that have been implemented to the planning framework in recent years, those reforms are not considered by Administration to render WALGA’s current Policy position less relevant.
Administration considers that Third Party Appeal Rights would result in more appeals that Local Governments would be required to respond to. This could lead to additional cost and resources being utilised by Local Governments through increased engagement of both planning and legal representation.
One of the most significant planning changes that has occurred in Western Australia in recent years has been the introduction of the DAPs. Although the DAP process does take some decision-making away from local government, it does not take away the ability for community consultation to be undertaken for DAP applications and community opinion being considered.
Administration acknowledges that planning outcomes caused by decisions made by DAP’s are sometimes questioned by members of the community. However, Administration does not consider that the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights (which would operate separately from the DAP process) is the appropriate mechanism to improve planning outcomes from development proposals presented to the DAP. Administration provides recommendations to the DAP, following assessments informed by the relevant planning instruments of the City (structure plans, District Planning Scheme No. 2, local planning policies etc). To ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved through the planning (and DAP) process, the City could explore the review and amendment of planning instruments as it considers necessary.
It is therefore recommended that the City provides a comment to WALGA outlining its position of not supporting Third Party Appeal Rights in the Western Australian planning system. Administration’s draft submission to WALGA is provided as Attachment 4.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.3 Advocate and collaborate for the benefit of the City”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights into the planning system would likely prompt the need for the City to introduce a new Local Planning Policy – or undertake a review to the current Local Planning Policy 4.17: State Administrative Tribunal.
Financial Implications
The City currently receives on average approximately 10 appeals per year. The introduction of third party appeal rights would likely increase the number of appeals the City responds to per year. This would also likely increase the demand for town planning and legal resources that the City requires in responding to appeals.
The cost to respond to each SAT appeal varies considerably. In some instances, appeals are responded to by Administration (without assistance from external consultants), and therefore costs responding to such matters are kept to operational costs. When the City does engage external consultants to assist in responding to a SAT appeal, monetary costs on the City typically vary from $10,000 to in excess of $200,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ENDORSES the draft submission that does not support Third Party Appeal Rights as per Attachment 4 of this Report and SUBMITS this as its submission to the Western Australian Local Government Association’s Third Party Appeal Rights in Planning Discussion Paper.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - 2008 Advice from City of Wanneroo to Dr. Janet Woollard MLA - Third Party Appeals |
17/212158 |
|
|
2⇩. |
WALGA Third Party Appeals Discussion Paper |
17/168211 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Table - Third Party Appeal Rights in other Jurisdictions and Administration Comment |
17/220404 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Submission to WALGA - Third Party Appeal Rights Discussion Paper |
17/219645 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 90
File Ref: 3290-08 – 17/231728
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider submissions received during public advertising of Amendment No. 8 to the East Wanneroo Cell 9 Approved Structure Plan No. 57 (ASP 57).
|
Applicant |
Rowe Group |
|
Owner |
BMC Properties (Australia) Pty Ltd and Octangler Pty Ltd ATF Alexander Trust |
|
Location |
Lot 154 and 155 Alexander Drive, Landsdale |
|
Site Area |
4.2239 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
|
ASP 57 Zoning |
Commercial and Residential Precinct |
Background
On 30 May 2016, Rowe Group Town Planners submitted a proposal to amend ASP 57 for the City’s consideration.
In ASP 57,
· Lot 1982, Alexander Drive, Landsdale located at the south-western corner of Alexander Drive and Gnangara Road is zoned Commercial (northern commercial site); and
· Lots 154 and 155, Alexander Drive, Landsdale located at the north-western corner of Alexander Drive and Landsdale are zoned Commercial and Residential Precinct with a density coding of R20/R30 (southern commercial site).
Attachment 1 contains ASP 57 Zoning Plan indicating the zoning and proposed amendment area of the above-mentioned lots.
Clause 12.3.6 of Part 1 of ASP 57 contains the Commercial Design Provision applicable to the commercial zones. This provision requires the location of vehicular access and parking area on the western side of the commercial sites in order to minimise radio frequency interference to the Perth International Telecommunication Centre (PITC) located on the eastern side of Alexander Drive.
The amendment proposes to rezone Lots 154 and 155 entirely as Commercial, modify Clause 12.3.6 and introduce a new clause 12.3.7.
Lots 154 and 155 being affected by the Department of Premier and Cabinet’s draft Green Growth Plan for Perth and Peel (GGP) meant that assessment of the amendment proposal could not be progressed until such time the issues relating to GGP were resolved by the applicant. This matter has since been resolved as explained in the Comment section below.
Detail
The details of the amendment proposals are as follows:
Rezoning
The applicant’s justification to rezone Lots 154 and 155 entirely as Commercial Zone is as follows:
ASP 57 originally proposed the northern and southern Commercial zones on,
· The eastern part of Lot 1981 Gnangara Road and whole of Lot 1982 Alexander Drive; and
· Portions of Lot 154 and 155 Alexander Drive.
Lot 1981 has since been rezoned entirely as Residential Precinct resulting in a loss of approximately 1.3 hectares of commercial land in East Landsdale. Therefore a consolidated commercial centre is required to meet the needs of the local community.
As the amendment primarily relates to the southern commercial site, it is referred as the amendment area in the report.
Clauses 12.3.6 & 12.3.7
The amendment primarily relates to the southern commercial site. Therefore it is proposed to insert the words ‘Northern Site’ to the heading of Clause 12.3.6 and to introduce a new Clause 12.3.7 Commercial Design Provisions – Southern Site. The salient provisions of this clause are:
· No direct vehicle access from Alexander Drive;
· One row of parking bays between Alexander Drive landscaping and the future buildings with limited number of bays on the second row;
· Treatment of all glazing fronting Alexander Drive with Radio Frequency shielding window film; and
· A roof pitch of at least 10 degrees.
Road network
Mela Way, Sedona Glade, Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace terminate at the southern commercial site. As per ASP 57, these roads are proposed to extend into Lots 154 and 155 along with a north-south subdivisional road connecting Sedona Glade and Landsdale Road. The amendment proposes to replace the north-south subdivisional road with a 6-metre wide vehicular and pedestrian access easement setback 5 metres from the western boundary of the amendment area.
Attachment 2 is the proposed Part 1 document as submitted by the applicant.
Consultation
The Amendment was advertised for public comment for a period of 28 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper and the City’s website and letters to adjoining and affected landowners. The submission period closed on 26 July 2016, with 31 submissions being received. Attachment 3 is a summary of submissions and Administration’s responses. Five submissions were made by the government agencies not raising any objection to the proposal. Of the remaining 26 submissions four supported and 22 objected to the proposal. It is noted that those who supported the amendment proposal do not live in the vicinity of the amendment area. Those who objected, live on Sedona Glade, Melanzana Chase, Mela Way and Ravanello Terrace terminating at the amendment area.
The main issues raised in the submissions are:
· Loss of amenity; and
· Increase in traffic.
A detailed discussion on these issues is provided in the Comment section below.
Comment
Discussion on the amendment proposals
Attachment 4 is a concept plan of the southern commercial site prepared by the applicant in consultation with Telstra to ensure that the proposed development minimises radio frequency interference to the PITC. The concept plan depicts a community purpose (CP) site the details of which are discussed below.
As per the provisions of ASP 57, the southern commercial site is proposed to include a CP site of size 5,000m2 in area for future acquisition by the City. Under the provisions of DPS 2, acquisition of the CP site and the design and construction of a community centre on this site are listed as specific cell works.
The concept plan, however, earmarks a CP site 3,630m2 in area located on the northern boundary of the amendment area abutting Alexander Drive. The applicant has discussed with Administration the location and intended layout of the CP site. Administration is satisfied with the location and extent of the CP site as it is considered to be sufficient for the City's needs.
As per the provisions of DPS 2, a CP site of 5,000m2 has been accounted for in the calculation of Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) in Cell 9. Since the applicant is proposing a CP site 3.630m2 in area, in accordance with Clause 9.13.3 of DPS 2 any excess ICPL received by Council will be distributed amongst the owners who made the Infrastructure Cost payments to the Cell 9 Account.
GGP
Lot 155 in its entirety and a portion of Lot 154 are affected by the draft GGP. The City has been advised by the Department of the Premier and Cabinet that the vegetation in the site is Bassendean Complex Central and South (26% remaining) and there is no indication that this vegetation is being targeted for retention.
The Department of Planning Land and Heritage officers have advised that the issues relating to GGP will be assessed by the WAPC when the amendment proposals are referred to it for its consideration.
Issues raised by the Submitters
The major issues raised by the submitters are discussed below.
Increase in Traffic
Melanzana Chase, Ravanello Terrace, Sedano Glade and Mela Way terminate at the southern commercial site. Residents on these streets were of the view that these roads will remain as dead-ends. ASP 57, which was initially adopted by Council in June 2009 subject to modifications, depicted these roads as extending further into the commercial site and connecting to Alexander Drive. The proposed amendment accords with the ASP 57.
ASP 57 does not allocate a maximum net lettable area (NLA) for the commercial site. This is consistent with the WAPC State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres for Perth and Peel, which does not recommend a NLA for the commercial centres. However, for the purpose of calculating the volume of traffic generated by this centre, a NLA of 4,000m2 was assumed generating 4,840 vehicle trips per day (vpd).
The supporting traffic report to the proposed amendment is based on 7,000m2 NLA generating a traffic volume of 8,470 vpd. Therefore the proposal will generate an additional traffic volume of 3,630 vpd.
Of 8,470 vpd generated by the centre, 3,510, 2,250 and 2,000 vpd are expected to enter/exit via Landsdale Road, Sedano Glade and Mela Way respectively and the remaining 710 vpd via Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace.
In ASP 57 Sedano Glade and Mela Way are proposed as Higher Order Access Way capable of carrying an indicative traffic volume of 3,000 vpd. Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace are proposed as Lower Order Access Ways capable of carrying an indicative traffic volume of 1,000vpd.
The following table indicates the additional capacity available on Sedano Glade, Mela Way, Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace.
|
Name of Road |
Indicative traffic volume (vpd) |
Estimated Volume of traffic from the Commercial site (vpd) |
Additional capacity (vpd) |
|
Sedano Glade |
3,000 |
2,250 |
750 |
|
Mela Way |
3,000 |
2,000 |
1,000 |
|
Melanzana Chase |
1,000 |
355 |
645 |
|
Ravanello Terrace |
1,000 |
355 |
645 |
In ASP 57, the Sedano Grade and Alexander Drive intersection is shown as a left-in/left-out intersection. Therefore the south bound traffic generated by dwellings on Mela Way, Sedano Glade, Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace are likely to exit via Pomodora Avenue connecting Kingsway and Landsdale Road and located to the west of the commercial site. Attachment 5 is map locating the amendment and the surrounding areas. Bounded by Kingsway, Pomodora Avenue and Landsdale Road, there are 187 lots likely to generate 1,496 vpd at the rate of 8 vehicle trips per day per dwelling. Considering the additional capacity of the roads terminating at the amendment area, these roads will be able to carry the normal traffic as well as the traffic generated by the commercial site.
In the absence of the current traffic count on Landsdale Road where it abuts the amendment area, the City’s traffic section has advised that it is possible that Landsdale Road could currently be carrying a traffic volume of 3,000 vpd. In addition to the traffic from the Centre, Landsdale Road would possibly carry a traffic volume of 3,000+3,510=6,510 vpd. The City’s Traffic section has further advised that Landsdale Road is listed as a Local Distributor Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy to carry a maximum desirable traffic volume of 6,000vpd. As the section of Landsdale Road abutting the centre is expected to carry more than 6,000vpd, this section of Landsdale Road may require to be upgraded to include a part raised / part flush median and pedestrian crossing facilities. This matter can be dealt with at the subdivision stage.
Loss of Amenity
Rezoning Lots 154 and 155 Alexander Drive entirely as Commercial will render the residential lots located at the end of Melanzana Chase, Ravanello Terrace, Mela Way and Sedano Glade as corner lots. The residents of these lots have advised that they purchased
their lots on the understanding that a row of residential lots along the western and northern boundaries of Lots 154 and 155 would act as a buffer between their lots and the commercial site. Therefore the proposed amendment would result in loss of amenity.
Corner lots are created with a 6x6 metre truncation to allow sight line and to accommodate underground services and footpath. By virtue of the amendment proposal, the objectors’ lots will become corner lots without a truncation. In Attachment 6 the applicant has demonstrated that in the absence of a corner truncation, it is still possible to accommodate a 1.5-metre wide footpath and to achieve the required sight-lines.
Clause 3.4.1 of DPS 2 states that the Residential Zone is intended primarily for residential development in the environment where high standards of amenity and safety predominate to ensure the health and welfare of the population. Administration is of the view that the affected residential lots together with the adjoining Residential Precinct within the amendment area as per the current ASP 57 could enjoy a higher standard of amenity and safety than if they were to abut a Commercial Zone. It is further considered that it is not desirable to enlarge the Commercial Zone at the expense of these residents. As the proposals do not meet the expectation of the residents of the adjoining residential lots it is recommended that the amendment proposal not be supported.
Conclusion
Rowe Group Town Planners have requested an amendment to ASP 57 by rezoning Lots 154 and 155 Alexander Drive, Landsdale entirely as Commercial. This proposal would render the lots at the end of Melanzana Chase, Ravanello Terrace, Mela Way and Sedano Glade where they terminate at the amendment area, as corner lots. Although the issues raised by the submittors can be resolved, Administration is of the view that the proposed amendment would affect the amenity of this locality. Therefore it is recommended to not support the amendment proposal.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 20 of the deemed provisions of DPS 2 provides that following advertisement of a Structure Plan amendment, Council must recommend whether the amendment should be approved by the WAPC. In this instance it is recommended that the amendment should not be approved by the WAPC.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“2 Economy
2.2 Strategic Growth
2.2.4 Protect and increase availability of employment generating land”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
This proposal has been assessed under the provisions of the WAPC’s State Planning Policy 4.2 Activity Centres for Perth and Peel and City’s Activity Centres Local Planning Policy 3.2.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 20(2)(e) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme to the No. 2 RECOMMENDS to Western Australian Planning Commission TO NOT APPROVE Amendment No. 8 to East Wanneroo Cell 9 – East Landsdale Agreed Structure Plan No. 57 (ASP 57) submitted by Rowe Group on behalf of BMC Properties (Australia) Pty Ltd to rezone Lots 154 and 155 Alexander Drive, Landsdale entirely as Commercial Zone, modify Clause 12.3.6 of the Statutory Section of ASP 57 and to introduce a new Clause 12.3.7 for the following reasons:
a) Mela Way, Sedona Glade, Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace terminate at Lots 154 and 155 Alexander Drive, Landsdale. Clause 3.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 states that the Residential Zone is intended primarily for residential development in the environment where high standards of amenity and safety predominate to ensure the health and welfare of the population. Abutting a Commercial Zone instead of a Residential Precinct, the affected residential lots at the end of Mela Way, Sedona Glade, Melanzana Chase and Ravanello Terrace are not likely to enjoy a high standard of amenity and safety; and
b) The proposals do not meet the expectation of the residents of the adjoining residential lots who purchased their lots on the understanding that they would be residing next to a residential area; and
2. Advises the submitters accordingly.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 1 |
17/273245 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 2 |
17/205270 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 3 |
17/232644 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 4 |
17/231866 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 5 |
17/233725 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Amdt 8 - Attachment 6 |
17/230516 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 119
File Ref: 4088 – 17/232825
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider proceeding with revisions to Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure (LPP 2.5).
Background
The purpose of LPP 2.5 is to provide clarity and guidance for the City and telecommunication infrastructure providers regarding the development assessment of telecommunications infrastructure.
Council adopted the existing version of LPP 2.5 at its 23 July 2013 meeting (PS01-07/13). Revisions to LPP 2.5 have since been prepared by Administration, as the policy was due for review. At its meeting on 11 October 2016 (PS07-10/16), Council resolved to advertise a revised draft version of the policy for public comment. The outcome of that public consultation is provided later in this Report.
Detail
Administration drafted revisions to LPP 2.5, which have been subject to public consultation. The key features of what the revised LPP 2.5 provides for are as follows:
· Outline of objectives, application and purpose of LPP 2.5;
· Development application submission requirements;
· A Policy Table outlining locational and design requirements for telecommunications infrastructure;
· Community consultation requirements in respect to telecommunications infrastructure development applications;
· A policy position outlining that the City is not responsible for the monitoring and control of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) that emanates or could potentially emanate from telecommunications infrastructure; and
· A policy position that defines the difference between telecommunications infrastructure and structures considered to fall under the ‘mast and antenna’ use class of DPS 2.
Consultation
In accordance with Council's October 2016 decision, the draft revised LPP 2.5 was advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days from 1 November 2016 to 13 December 2016 by way of:
· Advertisements placed in the 1 November 2016 edition of the Wanneroo Times and North Coast Times newspapers;
· Display at the City’s Civic Centre, libraries and on the City’s website; and
· Correspondence to the Department of Planning, the Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (AMTA) and 55 telecommunication service carriers and retailers as identified by Administration.
Administration received three submissions, each providing detailed comment on certain aspects of the policy. A summary of the submissions (with Administration’s response to the comments made in the submissions) is included as Attachment 1. The key issues raised in the submissions are as follows:
· The consultation requirements imposed in the draft LPP 2.5. In particular, the submitters argue that providing notice to all landowners and/or occupiers of land within 500 metres of proposed telecommunications infrastructure is unnecessary;
· The setback that telecommunications infrastructure must be from adjoining Residential, Mixed Use, Special Rural, Rural Community, Landscape Enhancement or Special Residential zoned land;
· For LPP 2.5 to better address the need to consider telecommunications infrastructure in preparing and assessing structure planning proposals;
· Permissibility of Telecommunications Infrastructure under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2); and
· Consideration to impose development approval exemptions for telecommunications infrastructure, when such proposals meet certain criteria.
Administration’s responses to the key issues are provided for in the Comment section below.
Administration also discussed the outcome of the submissions received with Elected Members at the 1 August 2017 Council Forum.
Comment
Consultation Requirements
Prior to the adoption of the current LPP 2.5, Council considered that the policy prescribes that consultation should involve giving notice to all landowners and/or occupiers of land within 500 metres of proposed telecommunications infrastructure (consultation radius). The submissions received argue that 500 metres in this instance is excessive.
As part of its review of the submissions, Administration inspected existing monopoles located on Badgerup Road in Wanneroo and adjacent to the Hepburn Avenue/Mirrabooka Avenue intersection in Darch, as well as the lattice tower at the Telstra site on Wanneroo Road in Wanneroo (just south of the Wanneroo Town Centre). Monopoles and lattice tower are terms that are defined in LPP 2.5. As part of the inspections, Administration took photographs of each facility at distances of (approximately) 100 metres, 200 metres and 500 metres, to gauge the visual impacts that telecommunications infrastructure may impose at such distances. Photographs are included in Attachment 2.
Administration considered that a 500 metre consultation radius was appropriate for lattice towers (the type of facility south of the Wanneroo Town Centre). Administration considers that lattice towers impose a greater visual impact compared to other forms of telecommunications infrastructure in terms of their bulk and scale. However, Administration also considered following those inspections that the consultation radius of 500 metres was excessive for other telecommunications infrastructure proposals (such as monopoles), based on their lesser visual impact. In light of these findings, Administration recommends that the draft policy be further revised to specify the following:
· A consultation radius of 500 metres continue to apply in instances a lattice tower is proposed; and
· A consultation radius of 200 metres instead be applied in all other instances.
Setback of Telecommunications Infrastructure to Residential and Rural zones
The advertised draft version of LPP 2.5 provides for a locational provision (Item L2 in the Policy Table) in that telecommunications infrastructure adjoining a lot (and offset greater than 75 metres) zoned Residential, Mixed Use, Special Rural, Rural Community, Landscape Enhancement or Special Residential will only be considered subject to consultation. The Policy provisions prescribe that an offset less than 75 metres would be unacceptable development.
All three submitters identified that providing an offset within the provision is inconsistent with SPP 5.2, SPP 5.2, prescribes that when preparing and reviewing local planning policies, local governments should ensure that buffer zones and/or setback distances are not included in local planning policies. Administration considers the offset provided for in the LPP 2.5 provision effectively is a setback provision in the context of SPP 5.2.
Administration is therefore recommending the removal of such offset provisions from LPP 2.5. These provisions are recommended to be replaced with a requirement to consult in instances where telecommunications infrastructure is proposed on land adjoining a lot zoned Residential, Mixed Use, Special Rural, Rural Community, Landscape Enhancement or Special Residential.
Consideration of Telecommunications Infrastructure in Structure Planning
SPP 5.2 makes provision for considering telecommunications infrastructure services in the preparation and assessment of structure plans at the local level.
However, it was identified when LPP 2.5 was being advertised that the policy did not affirm this SPP 5.2 position. The submissions identified that retrospective servicing of established residential development often causes land use conflicts and deployment delays. Administration agrees that conflicts could be minimised if telecommunications infrastructure sites were identified early in the planning process (through structure planning) if possible.
Therefore, Administration recommends that an additional policy provision be provided in LPP 2.5 (a new Section 6 of the General Policy Provisions) that outlines that the City should give consideration to demand and/or future need for telecommunications services in its preparation and assessment of structure planning proposals.
Permissibility of Telecommunications Infrastructure under DPS 2
The submissions received referenced a requirement of SPP 5.2 that prescribes that local governments should ensure that telecommunications infrastructure is not designated as a ‘use not permitted’ (or an ‘X’ use) by a local planning scheme in any zone. Administration agrees that DPS 2 is inconsistent with SPP 5.2, as DPS 2 prescribes that telecommunications infrastructure is an ‘X’ use in the Residential, Mixed Use and Special Residential zones.
However, Administration considers that the purpose of this advertising exercise is to seek comment on proposed revisions to LPP 2.5; and that land use permissibility of telecommunications infrastructure is a matter that could be considered as part of the City’s ongoing review and preparation of a new local planning scheme. However, should Council be mindful of the current land use permissibility for telecommunications infrastructure – and wish to address it prior to the preparation of a new local planning scheme – Council in its consideration to proceed with LPP 2.5 does have the option of requesting Administration prepare an amendment to the current DPS 2.
Development Approval Exemptions
As outlined in the draft LPP 2.5, some works on telecommunication infrastructure are exempt from development approval under Telecommunications Act 1997 (the ‘Act’); such as works that are deemed ‘Low-Impact’ in accordance with the Act and the Telecommunications (Low-Impact Facilities) Determination 1997. However, SPP 5.2 states that local government should, in addition to the exemptions under the Act, consider further exemptions from development approval for telecommunications infrastructure where:
a) The infrastructure has a maximum height of 30 metres from finished ground level;
b) The proposal complies with the policy measures outlined in this policy; and
c) The applicant has undertaken notification of the proposal in a similar manner to ‘low impact facilities’ as defined and set out in the relevant Industry Codes.
The language used in SPP 5.2 is suggestive, and the City is not bound to put measures in place exempting approval of such development.
Schedule 2 (District Planning Scheme No. 2 Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations) states that the carrying out of certain works as specified in a local planning policy can be exempt from development approval. However, Administration considers that adding further development approval exemptions for telecommunications infrastructure into LPP 2.5 should not be contemplated for the following reasons:
· Telecommunications infrastructure often generates significant community interest; and
· The development assessment process provides the City (Administration) with an opportunity to liaise with the applicant to mitigate the amenity impacts that such proposals often present.
Conclusion
In addition to summarising the submissions (and providing Administration’s response to the comments made in the submissions), Attachment 1 also provides for all of Administration’s modifications (including those discussed above) it is recommending following the advertisement of LPP 2.5.
Administration has prepared a track-change version of draft LPP 2.5 (refer Attachment 3) with the modifications it is recommending now that LPP 2.5 has been advertised. An updated draft LPP 2.5 (incorporating the recommended modifications) is included as Attachment 4.
Statutory Compliance
Preparation and Council’s further actions in respect to revisions to LPP 2.5 are to be in accordance with Clause 4 and Clause 5 of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) Deemed Provisions.
Should Council resolve to proceed with a new LPP 2.5, Council can consider revoking the existing LPP 2.5 (adopted by Council at its 23 July 2013 Meeting). Revocation of the existing policy can be undertaken pursuant to Clause 6 of the DPS 2 Deemed Provisions.
Pursuant to Clause 5 and Clause 4(4) of the DPS 2 Deemed Provisions, if the local government (City) resolves to proceed with a policy, the local government must publish notice of the policy in a newspaper circulating in the Scheme area. Should Council resolve to proceed with revisions to LPP 2.5 (as recommended by Administration), public notices must then be published in the Wanneroo Times and North Coast Times newspapers.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.4 Improve local amenity by retaining and complementing natural landscapes within the built environmental”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report. However, Administration acknowledges that unforeseen issues with applying local planning policies are more likely to arise if policies are not reviewed on a regular basis.
Policy Implications
Council proceeding with revisions to LPP 2.5 (as included in Attachment 4) will result in the current LPP 2.5 being redundant. A new LPP 2.5 will, however, still provide for clarity and guidance for the City and telecommunication infrastructure providers regarding the development assessment of telecommunications infrastructure.
Financial Implications
The cost of undertaking the necessary actions for Council to proceed with revisions to LPP 2.5 can be met from existing operational budgets.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the submissions received as summarised in Attachment 1 in respect revisions drafted for Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure and ENDORSES Administration's responses to those submissions;
2. Pursuant to Clause 5 and Clause 4(3)(b)(ii) of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 Deemed Provisions, PROCEEDS WITH Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure, as included in Attachment 4;
3. Pursuant to Clause 6 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 Deemed Provisions, REVOKES the Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure as was adopted by Council on 23 July 2013;
4. Pursuant to Clause 5, Clause 4(4) and Clause 6 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 Deemed Provisions, PUBLISHES notices of the following in the Wanneroo Times and North Coast Times newspapers:
a) of Council proceeding with a new Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure (included as Attachment 4 and as outlined in Item (2) above); and
b) of Council revoking a previous version Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure as adopted by Council on 23 July 2013 (as outlined in Item (3) above);
5. FORWARDS a copy of Local Planning Policy 2.5: Telecommunications Infrastructure (as included in Attachment 4) to the Department of Planning for its information; and
6. ADVISE submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Summary of Submissions and Recommended Modifications - Advertisement of Revisions to Local Planning Policy 2.5 Telecommunications Infrastructure |
17/232419 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Photographs of Telecommunications Infrastructure |
17/232417 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Track Change Version of LPP 2.5 Following Advertising |
17/232420 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Administration's Recommended Version of LPP 2.5 Following Advertising |
17/232432 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 166
File Ref: 20123 – 17/240238
Responsible Officer: A/Director Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To prepare an amendment to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2), by zoning a 326 square metre portion of Crown Land which is part of John Moloney Park, Marangaroo.
|
Applicant |
City of Wanneroo |
|
Owner |
Crown Land – City of Wanneroo Management |
|
Location |
Lot 10776 (34) Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo |
|
Site Area |
6.86 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Parks and Recreation |
Background
Lot 10776 (34) Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo (John Moloney Park) which is subject to this amendment is located where indicated on the plan included as Attachment 1. John Moloney Park is 6.86 hectares in area, and contains facilities available to the public including car parking, a playground, cricket nets, a cricket/football oval and a baseball/softball field.
Lot 825 is owned in Freehold by the City and adjoins John Moloney Park. Lot 825 is zoned 'Civic and Cultural' under DPS 2, and contains a building known as the Marangaroo Family Centre (MFC). The MFC site is currently leased, with the occupants also utilising the land on the portion of Crown Reserve adjoining Lot 825, which is subject to this amendment. The portion of Crown Reserve is utilised exclusively by the MFC occupants, and is surrounded by a chain mesh fence that prevents public access from the remainder of the Crown Reserve.
In a process separate yet relevant to this amendment (and subject to a separate Report on this Agenda), Administration is seeking to excise this portion of John Moloney Park and amalgamate this land into Lot 825. The 326 square metre extent of the land that Administration is seeking the City excise is shown on the plan included as Attachment 2.
This DPS 2 amendment proposes to apply a 'Civic and Cultural' zoning on the portion of John Moloney Park that Administration is seeking to excise for the City.
Detail
Amendment No. 144 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 proposes to zone a 326 square metre portion of John Moloney Park subject to the excision as 'Civic and Cultural' (the extent of which is included as Attachment 2). The amendment document (which includes a plan showing how the DPS 2 map would be modified as a result from this amendment) is included as Attachment 3.
Consultation
In accordance with Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, Amendment No. 144 will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), to assess the
environmental impacts of the proposal and to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is necessary.
Subject to no objection being received from the EPA, Amendment No. 144 will be advertised for public comment in accordance with the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations).
Regulation 35 (2) of the Regulations require a scheme amendment to be classed as basic, standard or complex by a local government to determine the advertising requirements. Amendment No. 144 is deemed by Administration to be a standard amendment, for reasons as set out below:
a) The amendment is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area (Metropolitan Region Scheme);
b) The amendment would have a minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment; and
c) The amendment is not considered to align with the criteria applicable for ‘basic’ and ‘complex’ amendments, prescribed in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Prior to advertising of Amendment No. 144, notification must be provided to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) of Council’s intention to advertise the amendment as a ‘standard’ amendment in accordance with Regulation 47 (1) of the Regulations. On completion of that notification, advertising is proposed to occur in the following manner for a period of no less than 42 days, consistent with the requirements of 47 (2) to (4) of the Regulations:
· Advertisement in a local newspaper;
· Display notice of the proposal in Council offices and on the City’s website; and
· Referral in writing to affected persons/agencies.
Comment
In late 2012, the City consulted with the (then) Department of Planning (DoP) on the proposal to excise land from John Moloney Park, for the purpose of amalgamating it into the MFC landholding. On 24 May 2013, the DoP provided the following comment:
· Expression of no objection in principle to the proposed excision of the portion of Crown Reserve 39479 and subsequent amalgamation into adjoining Lot 825; and
· Recommendation that the City of Wanneroo initiates an Amendment to DPS 2, to rezone the subject portion of land from a Public Recreation reserve to 'Civic and Cultural'.
A copy of the DoP's response is included in the amendment documentation included as Attachment 3. In response to the recommendation from the DoP, Administration has since prepared this DPS 2 amendment.
Administration has considered the potential impact on the amount of public open space in the locality that will remain, should the subject portion of John Moloney Park be amalgamated into adjoining Lot 825. Administration considers that:
· Should the subject portion of John Moloney Park be zoned ‘Civic and Cultural’ and amalgamated into the adjoining Lot 825, there will be an insignificant change of public open space remaining in the locality;
· The portion of John Moloney Park subject to this DPS 2 amendment contains facilities that are fenced from public access and are only available for the use of the occupants of the MFC. The remaining portion of John Moloney Park contains facilities such as a playground, a car park, a baseball/softball field, cricket pitch and cricket nets which will continue to be available to the public should the amendment be approved.
In light of the above, Administration recommends that this DPS 2 can be initiated and proceed to advertising.
Statutory Compliance
Actions arising in respect to Amendment No. 144 to DPS 2 are to be in accordance with the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.2 Provide safe spaces, centres and facilities through our infrastructure management and designs for community benefit and recreation”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The costs in undertaking further actions in respect to Amendment No. 144 to DPS 2 can be met from the existing Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 144 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to undertake the amendments to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 as prescribed in the document included as Attachment 3;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 35 (2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 144 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment pursuant to Regulation 34 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, for the following reasons:
a) The amendment is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area (Metropolitan Region Scheme);
b) The amendment would have a minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment; and
c) The amendment is not considered to align with the criteria applicable for ‘basic’ and ‘complex’ amendments, prescribed in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
3. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 144 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority; and
4. Subject to no objections being received from the Environmental Protection Authority and pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning Commission of its intention to advertise Amendment No. 144 and ADVERTISES Amendment No. 144 for public comment for a period of not less than 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 47(2) and 47(4) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Location Plan for Amendment No. 144 to DPS 2 |
17/241318 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 for August 2017 Report - Extent of Proposed Excision |
17/241573 |
|
|
3⇩. |
NEW Attachment 3 - August 2017 Report - Amendment 144 to DPS 2 - Report Prepared for Signing and Sealing |
17/256490 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 179
PS08-08/17 Recommendation for Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 - Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton
File Ref: 29324 – 17/202284
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 for Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton (LSP 102) to determine the modifications required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
|
Applicant |
CLE Town Planning and Design |
|
Owner |
Daws & Son Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 6 (19) Taronga Place, Eglinton |
|
Site Area |
28 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Background
The proposed LSP 102 was submitted on 10 March 2017, and on 4 April 2017, the Director Planning and Sustainability forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, notifying of Administration’s intent to advertise the proposed Structure Plan. Advertising of LSP 102 commenced on 11 April 2017, and closed on 9 May 2017, in accordance with Clause 18 of the Deemed Provisions of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Following this, a detailed assessment was undertaken of the proposed LSP 102.
Detail
Site
The LSP 102 area relates to the western portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton and covers approximately 28 hectares of land. The site is bound by Marmion Avenue to the west, vacant land zoned Residential under the Eglinton Agreed Structure Plan No. 82 (ASP 82) to the north, the Mitchell Freeway reserve to the east and Bluewater Drive to the south. A location plan is included as Attachment 1.
The subject site is zoned Urban under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and the Alkimos Eglinton District Structure Plan No. 18 (DSP 18) and Urban Development under DPS 2. In accordance with Clause 3.14.3 of DPS 2, a Structure Plan is required to be prepared and adopted prior to the commencement of subdivision or development within the Urban Development zone.
Proposal
The draft LSP 102 has been prepared to provide the broad planning framework to facilitate development of the area and to satisfy the requirements of DPS 2.
The LSP provides the framework for the creation of the following:
· Approximately 17.6 hectares of Residential zoned land with a residential density code range of R-MD 25 – R-MD 60. This will enable the development of approximately 460 dwellings;
· Approximately 2.9 hectares of Public Open Space (POS);
· Proposed locations of Neighbourhood Connector roads within the site to enable a permeable movement network that connects into the existing surrounding road networks.
The advertised version of the LSP 102 Part 1 document and Structure Plan Map is included as Attachment 2.
A revised version of the LSP 102 documents and the Structure Plan Map was submitted by the applicant following discussion and negotiation with Administration on 5 July 2017. This version included predominantly minor administrative changes and did not modify the general intent of LSP 102. The revised Part 1 document and Structure Plan Map is included as Attachment 3.
Consultation
The draft LSP 102 was advertised for public comment for a period of 28 days by means of a sign on site, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times and North Coast Times newspapers, display on the City’s website and letters written to surrounding landowners and occupiers. The submission period closed on 9 May 2017, with 17 submissions being received. A summary of submissions received and Administration’s responses are shown in Attachment 4.
The main issues raised during the advertising period and following detailed assessment by Administration relate to the following:
· Clearing of vegetation and the effect on flora and fauna within the area;
· Status of the Department of Environment and Energy’s (DEE) assessment of the proposal under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act);
· Information contained within the Bushfire Management Plan; and
· Increase in traffic on the surrounding road network.
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of LSP 102 is provided in the Comment section below.
Comment
Referral under the EPBC Act
A number of concerns were raised during the advertising period and during the assessment of LSP 102 regarding the amount of vegetation being retained on-site as well as the quality and species of vegetation being retained. In particular, concerns related to the retention of high quality Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain Threatened Ecological Community (Banksia Woodlands TEC) and suitable foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo.
Both Banksia Woodlands TEC and the foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo are recognised as endangered under the EPBC Act and identified for protection. On this basis, the applicant was also required to submit an EPBC referral to the DEE for assessment and approval of any clearing within the landholding that has the potential to impact on Matters of National Environmental Significance. These matters include Banksia Woodlands TEC and the foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo. This assessment and approval undertaken by the DEE runs as a separate process to the assessment and adoption of the proposed LSP, however the City must still consider the potential impacts of the proposed LSP on significant vegetation within the site.
Upon review of the Environmental Assessment Contained within Appendix 2 of the Technical Appendices and additional information received from the applicant regarding the intended vegetation to be retained within the entirety of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton, Administration is satisfied with the proposed LSP 102 in terms of its environmental impact for the following reasons:
The EPBC referral area is not limited to the LSP 102 area but covers the entirety of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton encompasses the land incorporated within LSP 102 as well as an additional 112 hectares of land to the east of the LSP 102 area located between the future rail reserve and Wanneroo Road, and bisected by the Mitchell Freeway reserve.
The breakdown of Banksia Woodland TEC and foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo within Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton is as follows:
· There are 92.4 hectares of moderate and high value foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo within the entirety of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. Of this, 20.4ha is located within the LSP 102 area.
· There are 49.29 hectares of Banksia Woodland TEC within the entirety of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. Of this, 10 hectares is located within the LSP 102 area.
As identified in Attachment 5, the applicant is proposing to retain a minimum of eight hectares of Banksia Woodland TEC and foraging habitat for the Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo within Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. These areas of retention are proposed outside of LSP 102 and within the remaining portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. This is because, through the Environmental Assessment undertaken by Strategen and submitted by the applicant, it was determined that the areas of vegetation outside of the LSP 102 area and within the remaining portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton represented the highest value of vegetation encompassing the largest area of land.
By retaining these areas of vegetation, this will ensure that the vegetation being retained has the greatest ability to provide habitat connectivity and reduce fragmentation. Whilst there are areas of high quality vegetation within the LSP 102 area, these areas encompass a smaller portion of land and if retained would not provide the same amount of value as those areas that are proposed for retention outside of the LSP 102 area and within the remaining portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. It is noted that future detailed planning, including a separate Structure Plan, is required to be adopted over the remaining portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton prior to this area being developed. This future Structure Plan will identify and ensure the retention of this vegetation in accordance with any EPBC approval granted over the land. Furthermore, the EPBC approval runs with the land and as such, ensures that any future landowners of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton will be required to retain the vegetation as specified in the EPBC approval.
Furthermore, whilst the EPBC referral does not indicate any areas for retention within LSP 102, the applicant is required to provide 3% of the LSP area as Nature POS in accordance with the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space. Nature (Conservation) POS is required for the purpose of conserving the significant natural assets within the site. The extent and location of Nature POS will be considered in further detail and determined at the time that a subdivision application is submitted and approved for the LSP 102 area. Notwithstanding this, Attachment 6 identifies where the possible vegetation retention, hence Nature POS sites, could be located. On this basis, Administration is satisfied that the designated locations of POS within LSP 102 can facilitate the protection of the significant natural assets within the site and allow for the 3% Nature POS to be provided. Administration is also recommending a provision be included within the Part 1 text which requires the retention of existing vegetation within the Structure Plan area where possible. This will be determined at the time that an application is submitted for subdivision or development of the land.
Consideration has also been given to the City’s Draft Local Biodiversity Strategy (Draft LBS) in assessing the suitability of development and associated clearing within the LSP 102 area.
The Draft LBS identifies the LSP 102 area as a Local Natural Area (LNA) within the Alkimos Eglinton Planning Precinct and identifies the vegetation within the LSP area as Cottesloe Complex – Central and South with a low to medium priority for conservation. It has been acknowledged within the Draft LBS that the majority of land within the Alkimos Eglinton Planning Precinct is zoned Urban and as such, is intended for future development. Notwithstanding, the Draft LBS indicates areas within this precinct which are identified as a medium to high priority for conservation. Confirming the findings of the Environmental Assessment provided by the applicant, the areas of medium to high priority vegetation within Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton are predominantly located outside of the LSP 102 area. On this basis, there are no areas of vegetation within the LSP 102 area that have been specifically identified for protection under the Draft LBS. With regard to the remaining portion of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton, the areas of vegetation required to be retained for conservation will be determined through the future detailed planning for this land, being a separate Structure Plan, and will be in accordance with the Draft LBS and the outcome of the current EPBC referral.
Further to the above information, Administration also liaised with the DEE to determine the status of the EPBC referral as well as to confirm whether there were any significant issues identified within the assessment process which may affect the proposed LSP 102. The DEE is not able to provide certainty regarding whether the EPBC assessment will modify the proposed LSP 102 as a full assessment has not yet been completed. The DEE was able to advise that in terms of the status of the assessment, at this point in time, additional information has been requested from the applicant as follows:
· Targeted Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat surveys;
· A discussion on proposed mitigation/management measures to protect Carnaby’s Black Cockatoos;
· Mapping of the extent of the Banksia Woodlands TEC in areas adjacent to Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton to assess indirect impacts;
· A Dieback assessment; and
· Proposed offsets.
Following receipt of this information, the proposal will be published and public comment invited by the DEE. Following the period of public comment, the applicant will then need to provide responses to any public comments provided, submit this to the DEE and at this point, the DEE will commence its full assessment of the proposal.
On the basis of the above, the City cannot be certain of the outcome of the EPBC referral and the resulting areas of retention that are required within the LSP 102 area and the entirety of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton. Notwithstanding, Administration has undertaken an assessment of the LSP 102 and subject to the decision made by the DEE with regard to the EPBC referral, is satisfied with the proposal. There are strict guidelines which the landowner must adhere to with regard to retention of vegetation under the EPBC Act. Following the approval of the EPBC referral by the DEE, this will guide the future development of Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton and the landowner will be required to retain any areas of vegetation as specified under the EPBC approval. It is noted that should the outcome of the EPBC referral require additional or modified areas of vegetation retention within LSP 102, the LSP will need to be modified to reflect this outcome prior to any clearing or development commencing on-site. On this basis, the City can continue to progress LSP 102 without the need for the EPBC referral to be completed.
As noted above, the EPBC referral process is a separate process to the adoption of LSP 102 and given the statutory timeframes within the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, the City is required to provide a recommendation to the WAPC on the proposed LSP 102 in lieu of a determination being made by the DEE on the EPBC referral.
On this basis, Administration recommends that Council support the LSP and advise the WAPC to consider the potential outcome of the current EPBC referral during its assessment of LSP 102.
Vegetation and Fauna Management Plan
Throughout the advertising period and assessment of LSP 102, concerns were raised with regard to the impact of the future development and associated clearing on fauna that may currently be located within the LSP 102 area.
The applicant has indicated that prior to any clearing being undertaken within the LSP 102 area, a fauna relocation campaign will be undertaken by a qualified expert for any fauna which may be affected by the clearing. Any affected fauna will then be relocated to a local conservation reserve based on advice from the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
In order to ensure that adequate consideration is given to the relocation of any fauna that may be affected by the development and associated clearing within the LSP 102 area, Administration is recommending that a provision be included within the LSP 102 Part 1 text which requires a Vegetation and Fauna Management Plan to be prepared and submitted at the time of lodgement of any subdivision application within the LSP 102 area.
Bushfire Management Plan
As part of the consultation process, the proposed LSP 102 was referred to the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) to review and provide comment on the Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) that was submitted with the LSP.
At the conclusion of this consultation period, DFES provided comment on the BMP which raised a number of issues with the information included and which required further consideration.
In response to DFES’ submission, the applicant provided a detailed response to address the comments made by DFES. DFES has reviewed the applicant’s response and indicated that they now support the BMP, subject to additional information being included regarding the classification of vegetation within and surrounding the LSP 102 area (see Attachment 4 for a summary of DFES’ comments). These modifications will not affect the overall design of the LSP, however should be undertaken prior to subsequent stages of the planning process.
On this basis, Administration supports the BMP subject to modifications being made to address the additional information as requested by DFES in their correspondence to the City dated 4 August 2017.
Traffic
During the advertising period, concerns were raised by surrounding local residents regarding the potential impact that the proposed LSP 102 would have on traffic within the existing road network and the impact of vehicles using Bluewater Drive for access and egress onto Marmion Avenue.
The applicant has submitted a detailed Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) with the LSP which investigates the expected traffic volumes for the site at full build out in 2031 and considers how these additional traffic volumes will impact on the surrounding road network.
A concept plan of the LSP 102 area has been prepared to determine the potential future access points to and from the site with consideration being given to the existing and proposed development within the ASP 82 area to the west of the subject site and the North Alkimos Agreed Structure Plan No. 73 (ASP 73) area to the south of the subject site. The concept plan indicates 13 access points to and from the site, with three providing access and egress to and from Bluewater Drive. The TIA investigates how traffic will be distributed amongst these access points and concludes that whilst it is inevitable that traffic will increase as a result of the development of the LSP 102 area, the expected traffic generated can be accommodated within the future planned external road network in accordance with the indicative road capacities within the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhood’s policy.
Further to this, it is noted that during the assessment and adoption of ASP 73 located to the south of the proposed LSP 102 area, the TIA submitted considered the appropriate intersection treatment for the intersection of Bluewater Drive and Marmion Avenue. This TIA took into account the expected traffic demand associated with the future development expected within Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton as well as incorporating additional traffic created by a ‘Park and Ride’ site associated with a future rail station located within Alkimos and indicated within DSP 18. This ‘Park and Ride’ site is no longer proposed. As a result, the ultimate traffic volumes within the surrounding road network are estimated to be less than what was originally designed and forecast for throughout the planning of ASP 73 and the planned intersection treatment for the intersection of Bluewater Drive and Marmion Avenue is sufficient to cater for the additional traffic generated by LSP 102.
The City’s Traffic and Transport service unit has assessed the proposed LSP 102 and the TIA submitted with the proposal and confirmed that the information provided meets the requirements of the WAPC’s Transport Assessment Guidelines for Development. Furthermore, the expected traffic generated by LSP 102 can be safely accommodated within the existing surrounding road network in accordance with the indicative road capacities identified within the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy.
Amended LSP 102 Documents
Following the consultation process and assessment of LSP 102, the applicant agreed to make a number of the changes to LSP 102 and have updated Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and the Structure Plan Map to reflect these modifications. These modifications are predominantly minor administrative changes and did not modify the general intent of LSP 102.
As such, and due to legislative requirements, Administration is intending to recommend support for the proposed LSP 102 as submitted, subject to a modification to replace the Part 1 document and Structure Plan Map with that included in Attachment 3 to this report and replace the Part 2 and Part 3 documents with those submitted to the City, dated July 2017.
Following submission of the revised LSP 102 documents an error was identified within ‘Table 1 – Land Use Summary’ within both the Part 1 and Part 2 documents. Table 1 indicates that the LSP proposes 7.5 hectares of Residential land and 17.6 hectares of road reserve. The applicant has confirmed that this should actually indicate that there is 17.6 hectares of Residential land and 7.5 hectares of road reserve. On this basis, Administration recommends that the Part 1 and Part 2 documents be further updated to rectify this error.
Conclusion
Considering the above comments, the proposed LSP 102 has been assessed by Administration and is considered acceptable subject to the following modifications:
1. Replacing the advertised LSP 102 with that provided to the City following further discussion and negotiation with the applicant;
2. The inclusion of a provision within the Part 1 text requiring a Vegetation and Fauna Management Plan to be prepared and submitted at the time of lodgement of a subdivision application within the LSP area;
3. Additional information being included within the BMP as requested by DFES in its correspondence to the City dated 4 August 2017 and summarised in Attachment 3.
4. ‘Table 1 – Land Use Summary’ of the Part 1 and Part 2 documents being modified to rectify errors regarding the amount of Residential land and road reserve proposed within LSP 102.
Further to the above, Administration recommends that the WAPC be advised that the City’s support of LSP 102 has not considered the requirements for retention of vegetation under the EPBC Act, as a decision has not been made by the DEE in respect to the EPBC referral submitted by the applicant. The WAPC should consider the potential outcome of the current EPBC referral during further assessment of LSP 102.
Statutory Compliance
The Structure Plan will follow the statutory process as outlined in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.2 Enhanced Environment
3.2.3 Optimize retention of significant vegetation and habitat”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Administration’s assessment of LSP 102 has been undertaken in accordance with the following policies:
· Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space;
· State Planning Policy 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas; and
· WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy;
· Draft Local Biodiversity Strategy.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to subclause 20(2)(e) of the Deemed Provisions of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 RECOMMENDS to the Western Australian Planning Commission that the proposed Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 for Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton be approved subject to the following modifications:
a) That the Part 1 text and plan be replaced by Attachment 3 to this report.
b) That the Part 2 and Part 3 be replaced by the updated documents submitted by the applicant dated July 2017.
c) A provision to be included within the Part 1 text requiring a Vegetation and Fauna Management Plan to be prepared and submitted at the time of lodgement of a subdivision application within the Structure Plan area.
d) The Bushfire Management Plan being modified to include additional information as requested by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services in its correspondence to the City dated 4 August 2017.
e) ‘Table 1 – Land Use Summary’ within the Part 1 and Part 2 documents being modified to rectify errors regarding the amount of Residential land and road reserve proposed within the Structure Plan area.
f) A provision to be included within the Part 1 text which states as follows:
“Existing vegetation shall be retained within the structure plan area where possible and will be determined at the time that an application is submitted for subdivision or development of the land.”
2. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission that the City has not considered in full the Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 for Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton with regard to the requirements for retention of vegetation under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC) as a decision has not been made by the Department of Environment and Energy in respect to the EPBC referral submitted by the applicant. The Western Australian Planning Commission should consider the potential outcome of the current EPBC referral during further assessment of the Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 for Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton.
3. FORWARDS a copy of the report on the proposed Western Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 102 for Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
4. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - LSP 102 |
17/237952 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Part 1 Advertised - Local Structure Plan 102 - Western Precinct Lot 6 Taronga Place |
17/99811 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3: Revised Part 1 - LSP 102 - Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton |
17/235511 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Schedule of submissions - Western Precinct LSP 102 - Lot 6 Taronga Place, Eglinton |
17/235486 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Plan showing vegetation to be retained - LSP 102 |
17/264354 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Areas of POS and potential vegetation to be retained - LSP 102 |
17/264356 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 234
PS09-08/17 Consideration of Development Application for 10 Multiple Dwellings at Lot 40 (40) Winship Avenue, Wanneroo (DA2016/1810)
File Ref: DA2016/1810 – 17/273475
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a development application for 10 Multiple Dwellings at Lot 40 (40) Winship Avenue, Wanneroo.
|
Applicant |
Zegna Pty Ltd |
|
Owner |
MRF Civil Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 40 (40) Winship Avenue, Wanneroo |
|
Site Area |
1257m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential R20/R40 |
Background
On 19 December 2016, the City received an application for 11 Multiple Dwellings at Lot 40 (40) Winship Avenue, Wanneroo (subject site). A location plan of the subject site is included as Attachment 1.
The proposal that was originally submitted and advertised for 11 Multiple Dwellings on the subject site proposed a total plot ratio of 0.66 in lieu of the 0.6 required under Clause 6.1.1 of the Residential Design Codes (R-Codes). Following discussion and negotiation with Administration, the applicant agreed to remove one dwelling in order to comply with the plot ratio requirements of Clause 6.1.1 of the R-Codes. As a result, the application requiring consideration is for 10 Multiple Dwellings on the subject site.
The subject site is zoned Residential under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and has a split residential density code of R20/R40 as approved through Amendment No. 119 to DPS 2.
Detail
The Development Application proposes 10 Multiple Dwellings which is a ‘D’ Discretionary land use within the Residential zone under DPS 2. The application incorporates the following:
· 10 two bedroom dwellings;
· 10 resident car parking bays; and
· 3 visitor car parking bays.
Plans depicting the proposal are included in Attachment 2.
Consultation
In accordance with Clause 2.5.4 of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.20: Split Coded Areas, where a proposal comprises Multiple Dwellings, the proposal shall be advertised to surrounding landowners in accordance with Clause 64 of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2.
Public consultation was undertaken by way of letters sent to the owners and occupiers of 12 surrounding properties for a period of 14 days between 3 February 2017 and 17 February 2017. At the conclusion of the advertising period, three submissions were received which objected to the proposal. A summary of submissions received and Administration’s responses is included in Attachment 3.
The main issues raised during the advertising period and following detailed assessment by Administration relate to:
· Traffic;
· Boundary walls; and
· Waste Management.
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of the application is provided in the Comment section below.
Comment
The proposal was assessed against the provisions of DPS 2, Part 6 of the R-Codes relating to Multiple Dwellings, Local Planning Policy 2.4: Establishing Building Pad Levels, Excavation and Fill Associated with Residential Development (LPP 2.4) and Local Planning Policy 4.20: Split Coded Areas (LPP 4.20). The proposal is compliant with these documents with the exception of the boundary wall requirements of the R-Codes. An assessment against the relevant provisions of the Western Australian Planning Commissions’ (WAPC) Draft Apartment Design Policy was also undertaken.
Assessment against Clause 4.5.4 of DPS 2
The subject site has a split residential density code of R20/R40 under DPS 2. Clause 4.5.4 of DPS 2 details that where a lot has a split density code under DPS 2, development shall conform to the lower density code applicable to the lot unless able to meet the requirements of Clause 4.5.4 (a) and (b) as follows:
(a) Sufficient capacity exists in all necessary public utility services to adequately meet the needs of the development; and
(b) The development has one consolidated vehicle access point with reciprocal access rights to serve all dwellings, and restricted vehicle access to other areas of road frontage.
The proposed development meets the requirements of Clause 4.5.4 of DPS 2 as follows:
(a) The applicant has provided written confirmation from the Water Corporation to confirm that the existing infrastructure is capable of accommodating the proposed development. Confirmation has also been received from Western Power which relates to the split coded areas generally, stating that Western Power can accommodate the increase in demand for power expected as a result of the future development within the split coded areas; and
(b) The development proposes one consolidated shared vehicular access point to accommodate the 10 Multiple Dwellings.
As a result of the above, the proposal meets the requirements of Clause 4.5.4 of DPS 2 and the development has been assessed according to the higher density code of R40.
Assessment against LPP 4.20
LPP 4.20 was adopted by the City in order to provide guidance on the redevelopment of areas subject to a split density code. An assessment of the proposal against the applicable requirements of LPP 4.20 is shown in the table below.
|
Clause |
Requirements |
Compliance of Proposed Development |
|
2.5 |
Multiple Dwelling Development |
|
|
2.5.1 |
A maximum of one (1) vehicular crossover per street frontage shall be permitted to provide vehicle access to all dwellings. |
Complies. The proposal includes one consolidated shared vehicular access point to Winship Avenue. |
|
2.5.3 |
Crossovers shall not exceed 6m in width at the lot boundary. |
Complies. The proposed crossover is 6m in width. |
|
2.5.4 |
Where a proposal comprises Multiple Dwellings, the proposal shall be advertised in accordance with Clause 64 of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2. |
Complies. The proposal was advertised as detailed in the Consultation section of the report. |
|
4 |
Street Surveillance |
|
|
4.1.1 |
At least one balcony, verandah or major opening to a habitable room must face and have an uninterrupted view of each of the following: · Primary street; · Pedestrian approach to the dwelling; and · Vehicular approach to the dwelling. |
Complies. · Major openings and a balcony faces the primary street. · Major openings and balconies are fronting both the pedestrian and vehicular approach to the dwellings. |
|
5 |
Landscaping |
|
|
5.1.1 |
No more than 50% of the front setback area shall comprise impermeable hardstand including synthetic turf, loose stone, compacted limestone or paving. |
Complies. 49.6% of the front setback area is comprised of hardstand. |
|
5.1.2 |
The remaining 50% of the front setback area shall comprise soft landscaping defined as turf, planting and/or trees. |
Complies. 50.4% of the front setback area is comprised of soft landscaping. |
|
6 |
Crossover Design |
|
|
6.1.1 |
Proposed new crossovers shall not exceed three metres in width at the lot boundary unless: a) The development proposes five or more dwellings on the parent lot. |
Complies. The proposed crossover is 6m in width as the development proposes 10 dwellings on the parent lot. |
|
6.1.3 |
Approved crossovers shall be setback a maximum of 1.0m from the lot boundary to maximise landscaping and on street parking opportunities except where the development proposes a configuration of dwellings that is serviced by a central access way. |
Complies. The development proposes a configuration of dwellings that is serviced by a central access way. |
Traffic and Parking
Concerns were raised during the advertising period regarding the potential for increased traffic congestion on the surrounding road network as a result of the proposed development.
Winship Avenue is considered to be an Access Street C under the Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy which is constructed to carry an average daily traffic volume of 3000 vehicle trips per day.
There are currently 42 dwellings which have direct vehicular access to their lots from Winship Avenue. Based on the Department of Planning’s Transport Data, a dwelling is assumed to generate an average of eight vehicle trips per day. Based on this data, the current daily vehicle trips per day generated by the existing dwellings with vehicle access from Winship Avenue is approximately 336. As a result of the proposed development, there will be an additional nine dwellings which gain vehicle access from Winship Avenue (there is already an existing house on the subject site). This will increase the total number of vehicle trips per day on Winship Avenue by 72 to equal a total of approximately 408 vehicle trips per day being generated by the dwellings with access onto Winship Avenue. This figure is considerably lower than the potential capacity of Winship Avenue for 3000 vehicle trips per day as indicated within Liveable Neighbourhoods. Furthermore, the increase of 72 vehicular trips per day on Winship Avenue and the surrounding road network is not considered to have a noticeable impact on the traffic and congestion of the surrounding roads.
It is likely that there will be additional traffic, other than that generated from the dwellings with vehicular access onto Winship Avenue that will use Winship Avenue for vehicular access onto the surrounding road network. However, this will not substantially increase the vehicular traffic on top of that generated by the residences in the street to a point which will exceed the 3000 vehicular trip per day indicative capacity.
At the time that Amendment No. 119 to DPS 2 was being prepared and considered, a Traffic Impact Assessme nt (dated January 2013) was undertaken for the Wanneroo, Girrawheen and Koondoola areas to ensure that the existing roads and infrastructure could accommodate the expected increase in traffic as a result of the expected future development. It was determined that the surrounding road network could safely accommodate the expected increase in traffic as a result of the adoption of Amendment No. 119.
Given the above, the potential increase in vehicular trips per day as a result of the proposed development will not generate traffic or create traffic congestion on Winship Avenue and the surrounding road network that is not able to be accommodated.
Boundary Walls
The Deemed to Comply provisions of Clause 6.1.4 of the R-Codes permit boundary walls to one side boundary only. The development proposes boundary walls to both the eastern boundary side and the south western boundary side. The eastern boundary wall is a total length of 9.8m and has a maximum height of 2.9 above natural ground level. The south western boundary wall is a total length of 12.5m and has a maximum height of 2m above natural ground level. Both boundary walls individually meet the maximum length and height requirements of the Deemed to Comply requirements of Clause 6.1.4 (C4.3) of the R-Codes, which permits boundary walls to be an average of 3m in height with a maximum of 3.5m and a maximum length of two thirds the length of the lot boundary. An assessment of the boundary walls has been undertaken based on the Design Principles of Clause 6.1.4 of the R-Codes and is demonstrated in the table below.
|
Design Principles Clause 6.1.4 P4.1 |
Administration Comments |
|
Ensures adequate daylight, direct sun and ventilation for buildings and the open space associated with them. |
The design of the development ensures that each dwelling within the development can achieve direct sun and ventilation.
Furthermore, the boundary walls are proposed for the storerooms and the bin storage area and as such do not affect the extent of daylight, direct sun and ventilation for the dwellings and their open spaces. |
|
Moderate the visual impact of building bulk on a neighbouring property. |
The proposed boundary walls are both single storey and comply with the maximum height and length requirements of the Deemed to Comply provisions of Clause 6.1.4. The R-Codes Explanatory Guidelines state that single storey walls are not considered problematic in terms of impact on adjoining properties and building bulk.
On this basis, the two boundary walls proposed will not create excessive building bulk on the adjoining properties. |
|
Ensure access to daylight and direct sun for adjoining properties. |
The proposed boundary wall on the eastern side boundary will primarily cast any shadow into the subject site and not the adjoining properties. The proposed boundary wall on the south western side boundary will cast a shadow onto the adjoining property, however the shadow cast is minimal and will equate to approximately 3% of the adjoining lot’s site area. The development complies with the requirements of Clause 6.4.2 of the R-Codes relating to Solar Access, which permits the development to cast a shadow on the adjoining property to a maximum of 25% of the adjoining lot’s site area.
The second storey of the subject development is also setback from the boundary to allow for daylight and direct sun to the adjoining properties. |
|
Assist with the protection of privacy between adjoining properties. |
The proposed boundary walls do not incorporate any major openings to habitable rooms and as such, there will be no impact on visual privacy to the adjoining lots as a result of the two boundary walls proposed. |
Based on the above, the boundary walls are considered to meet the Design Principles of Clause 6.1.4 of the R-Codes and are supported.
Waste Management
Concerns were raised during the advertising period and during assessment of the application by Administration, regarding the collection of waste and the number of bins that will be required to service the 10 dwellings proposed on-site.
As a result of these concerns, the applicant submitted a Waste Management Plan for the subject site in order to outline the measures for waste collection from the site and ensure that the collection of waste does not negatively impact on the surrounding residential properties or the residents of the proposed development.
The Waste Management Plan includes the following measures:
· Three 660 litre bins will be provided for general waste and one 660 litre bin will be provided for recycling for the residents of the development;
· A caretaker will be appointed for the subject development to manage the storage and collection of bins for the site;
· The bins will be stored in the designated bin store area as indicated on the proposed plans. The bin store is fully enclosed and only accessible by residents, the caretaker or the waste service provider. The bin store is to be designed in a manner to prevent smells and noise and will be designed in accordance with the Australian Standard 1668 to ensure effective ventilation and the City’s Health Local Law 1999; and
· The caretaker will present the bins for collection on the designated bin collection days and the bins will be collected from the verge by a private waste service provider. The caretaker will then return the empty bins to the bin store area.
The measures included within the Waste Management Plan will reduce the number of bins required for the subject site and ensure that the waste collection occurring on-site does not impact on the amenity of the surrounding landowners. A condition is recommended to be placed on any approval, requiring the implementation of the measures of the Waste Management Plan as submitted by the applicant, dated 5 May 2017.
WAPC’s Design WA and Draft Apartment Design Policy
The WAPC has released a Draft Apartment Design Policy as part of the Design WA initiative in order to provide design guidance for apartments and mixed use development. This document was released for public comment and the City has made a submission to the WAPC. This policy is currently in draft form and has not been finalised or formally adopted.
As recently discussed at Council Forum on 1 August 2017, in order to ensure better design outcomes for multiple dwelling (apartment) development within split coded areas a number of actions were proposed by Administration for future apartment applications, including the Office of the Government Architect reviewing apartment applications. Given this development application was lodged and assessed prior to this Forum the application has not been reviewed by the Office of the Government Architect.
Notwithstanding this, an assessment against the relevant provisions contained within Apartment Design Policy has been undertaken by Administration in order to ensure an acceptable design outcome. Administration is of the view that the development does provide an appropriate design outcome as it contributes positively to the streetscape, does not have an adverse impact on the adjoining properties and provides sufficient areas for residents to recreate. A more detailed assessment against the relevant provisions of the Apartment Design Policy is discussed below.
Ventilation
The Design Criteria (comparative to the ‘Deemed to Comply’ provisions of the R-Codes) of Clause 4.2.2 of the Draft Apartment Design Policy requires at least 60% of apartments to be naturally cross ventilated, which equates to a total of six units within the subject development which are required to be naturally cross ventilated. The development proposes all units to be naturally cross ventilated.
Further to this, the Design Criteria of Clause 4.2.2 also states that the overall depths of cross ventilated apartments do not exceed 18m in depth. All units are proposed to be less than 18m in depth. In addition to this, all units are proposed to be less than 15m in depth which is considered to be the optimum outcome with regard to natural cross ventilation.
Based on the above, the development is considered to meet the requirements of Clause 4.2.2 of the Draft Apartment Design Policy.
Deep Soil Areas
Deep soil area is defined within the Draft Apartment Design Policy as soft landscape area on a lot with no impeding building structure or feature above or below, which supports growth of medium to large canopy trees.
The Design Criteria of Clause 3.4 of the Draft Apartment Design Policy requires 12% of the site area to be provided as deep soil area with a minimum dimension of 3m. This equates to a total of 150.8m2 of deep soil area which should be provided for the subject site. The development provides a total of approximately 130m2 (10.3%) of the site area dedicated for deep soil landscaping, with approximately 90m2 (7.2%) of this landscaped area having a dimension greater than 3m.
The Design Guidance (comparative to the ‘Design Principles’ of the R-Codes) of Clause 3.4 notes that the deep soil area is intended to ensure that a development includes sufficient areas which can be used for planting of trees which can mature. Although the provision of deep soil areas has not been satisfied by the proposal, the proposal does incorporate landscaping areas within the site with dimensions ranging from 2m to 8m which can be utilised for the planting of trees which can mature.
Additionally, the applicant has provided a landscaping plan with the application which indicates the location of various shrubs and trees to be planted within the site in order to contribute to the amenity of the site and the presentation of the development to the streetscape.
It is further noted that the R-Codes do not specify any requirements for the provision of deep soil areas within a lot. The R-Codes and the City’s LPP 4.20 do however, specify the requirement for 50% of the front setback area to be provided for soft landscaping, which as detailed above has been satisfied.
On the basis of the above, it is considered that although the development does not provide the 12% deep soil area as prescribed by Clause 3.4 within the Draft Apartment Design Policy, the landscaped deep soil areas provided can accommodate the planting and growth of mature trees within the site. Additionally, the landscaped areas within the front setback will positively contribute to the existing streetscape.
Communal Open Space
The Design Criteria of Clause 3.5 of the Draft Apartment Design Policy states that for development proposing up to 10 dwellings, there is no requirement for communal open space to be provided on the property. The development is proposing 10 dwellings, and as such is not required to provide communal open space on the site and complies with Clause 3.5 of the Draft Apartment Design Policy.
Conclusion
The application for 10 Multiple Dwellings at 40 Winship Avenue, Wanneroo has been assessed against the relevant requirements of the R-Codes, LPP 4.20 and LPP 2.4, with consideration given the WAPC’s Draft Apartment Guidelines. The proposal is considered to generally meet the requirements of the R-Codes, LPP 4.20, and LPP 2.4 and the intent of the relevant provisions within the Draft Apartment Design Policy.
As detailed above, the variation to the Deemed to Comply provisions of Clause 6.1.4 of the R-Codes relating to boundary walls is considered to meet the relevant Design Principles and is supported. Further, it is considered the proposed development generally provides a good design outcome as the building and associated landscaping positively contributes to the amenity of the locality.
Administration is of the view that the development is acceptable and therefore, it is recommended that the development application be approved subject to Administration’s recommended conditions.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the R-Codes, LPP 2.4 and LPP 4.20, with consideration given to the WAPC’s Draft Apartment Design Guidelines.
The development has largely been found to be compliant with the requirements of the R-Codes, LPP 2.4 and LPP 4.20.
As recently discussed at Council Forum on 1 August 2017, Administration is proposing to amend LPP 4.20 for split coded areas, with a view to addressing issues relating to ensuring Multiple Dwelling developments are designed to a high standard for occupants, they contribute to the overall streetscape and minimise their impact on adjoining properties.
Delegation to Determine Application
Pursuant to Part 8.3(b) of the City’s Delegated Authority Register and Sub-Delegated Authority Register, the application may be considered under delegation if, it is the view of the Operations Manager Planning and Development Services or Director, Planning and Sustainability, that the objections do not raise relevant planning considerations that cannot be specifically addressed or overcome by modifications to the proposal, or imposition of appropriate conditions of approval.
In this instance, Administration is of the opinion that the objections raised a number of relevant planning considerations; however Administration does not consider that these can be addressed by modification of the proposal or imposition of conditions. Therefore, the application cannot be considered under delegated authority and must be determined by Council.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.6 Housing Choice
3.6.1 Facilitate housing diversity to reflect changing community needs”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 APPROVES the Development Application for 10 Multiple Dwellings at Lot 40 (40) Winship Avenue, Wanneroo as shown in Attachment 2, subject to the following conditions:
a) Parking areas, driveways, crossovers and points of ingress and egress shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the Australian Standard for Offstreet Carparking (AS2890) as amended and the City of Wanneroo Technical Standards, and shall be drained, sealed and marked.
b) The parking areas and associated access indicated on the approved plans shall not be used for the purpose of storage or obstructed in any way at any time, without the prior approval of the City.
c) Stormwater and any other water run-off from buildings or paved areas shall be collected and retained on-site.
d) The applicant shall undertake adequate measures to minimise any impacts of dust and sand drift from the site.
e) Residents and visitor car parking spaces shall be marked and clearly signposted as dedicated for residents and visitor use only respectively, to the satisfaction of the City.
f) All refuse shall be stored within the designated bin enclosure and shall be collected from the site by a private contractor at the cost of the applicant/landowner in accordance with the Waste Management Plan prepared by Encycle Consulting, dated 5 May 2017.
g) Lighting shall be installed in all car-parking areas, driveways and pedestrian pathways prior to the development first being occupied.
h) Planting and Landscaping shall be carried out in accordance with the plans as submitted prior to the occupation of the development and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the Manager Land Development.
2. ENDORSES Administration’s responses to the submissions as provided in Attachment 3; and
3. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Location Plan - 40 Winship Avenue, Wanneroo (DA2016/1810) |
17/241091 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2: Development Plans - 40 Winship Avenue, Wanneroo (DA2016/1810) |
17/236060 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3: Summary of Submissions and Administrations Comments and Recommendations - DA2016/1810 |
17/238723 |
Minuted |
Assets
File Ref: 3120V03 – 17/206640
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider an offer by Main Roads WA (MRWA) to provide the City with up to $2.4M to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade, Merriwa.
Background
Council received petition PT03-03/13 at its meeting of 5 March 2013, which read:
“WE, the undersigned, all being residents of the City of Wanneroo do formally request Council’s consideration to allocate funds in the next budget to erect a sound barrier wall around the two roads bordering Cambrai Village; Hester Avenue and Connolly Drive, Merriwa, and to install traffic signals to the entrance to the village; Burton Drive and Hester Avenue, Merriwa. The increase in traffic is having a detrimental effect on the health and wellbeing of our residents and there is a real danger of serious accident occurring at the entrance to the village. With the proposed extension of the Freeway to Hester Ave, these matters will only be exacerbated.”
In June 2013, Council considered Item No IN06-08/13 in response to this petition. Administration advised that:
“Given the above traffic volumes and accident statistics, should traffic control signals be considered on Hester Avenue between Marmion Avenue and Connolly Drive, the most likely intersection would be at Baltimore Parade. Traffic signals at that location would have the additional benefit of providing gaps in the Hester Avenue traffic stream that would assist users of both Renshaw Boulevard and Burton Drive.”
Administration has always supported the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue, rather than at the access to RAFFA Cambrai as signals at Baltimore would be able to service both the retirement village and the wider community and are considered more pedestrian friendly than roundabouts.
The extension of the Mitchell Freeway to Hester Avenue is expected to significantly increase traffic volumes on Hester Avenue and concerns have already been raised with the City regarding the operation of connecting roads between Connolly Drive and Marmion Avenue, these being Baltimore Parade, Renshaw Boulevard and Burton Drive. Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan. Currently, the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue operates as a give way controlled T-intersection as shown in Attachment 2.
The Public Transport Authority (PTA) is concerned regarding the difficulty buses will have turning right from Baltimore Parade and Renshaw Boulevard across the increased traffic flows on Hester Avenue, and concerns from the residents of RAAFA Cambrai Village which is bounded by Baltimore Parade, Hester Avenue and Connolly Drive.
These issues have been raised and discussed with Main Roads WA over the past few months and recently MRWA has offered the City funding to construct a roundabout at Hester Avenue/Baltimore Parade intersection. This report considers the details of the traffic concerns, MRWA offer and the City’s proposed response.
Detail
The PTA operates the 483 bus route between Clarkson Train Station and Benenden Avenue in Alkimos. On the southbound journey from Alkimos to Clarkson, this service passes through Merriwa and is required to turn right from Baltimore Parade into Hester Avenue. Conversely, on the northbound trip, the 483 passes through Clarkson and is required to turn right from Renshaw Boulevard into Hester Avenue. The PTA raised concerns with the City regarding the safety of both right turn manoeuvres following the opening of the Mitchell Freeway extension when traffic volumes on Hester Avenue are predicted to increase.
Through discussions between the City, MRWA and PTA, the City agrees with PTA’s request to install traffic signals at the intersection of Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade. In support of this request, Administration undertook traffic analysis of the Baltimore Parade/Hester Avenue intersection to determine the most suitable means of control for this intersection. The analysis considered the intersection in its current T-intersection configuration and how it would operate if works were undertaken to install a roundabout or traffic signals. Analysis was done for three scenarios, 2016 before the freeway extension to Hester Avenue is complete, 2021 when the freeway terminates at Hester Avenue and 2031 when the freeway is extended beyond Hester Avenue.
Under the current T-intersection configuration, significant delays will be experienced by vehicles turning right from Baltimore Parade to Hester Avenue, especially during the afternoon peak. The City’s traffic modelling showed that both a roundabout and traffic signals will reduce delays for these vehicles with a roundabout offering the greatest overall reduction in congestion over all of the scenarios considered (2016, 2021 and 2031). MRWA has provided the City with its’ traffic modelling of this intersection conducted using a different software package. The modelling conducted by MRWA differs in some respects but also comes to the conclusion that both a roundabout and traffic signal will improve congestion at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue.
Although a roundabout is more efficient in terms of reduction in traffic congestion at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue, Administration considers that there are other associated benefits favouring the installation of traffic signals including; improved safety and operational efficiency for PTA bus routes, traffic signals also provide gaps in traffic flow on Hester Avenue during phase changes (where no vehicles are permitted to move through the intersection). This would benefit motorists using Renshaw Boulevard and Burton Drive by providing gaps in traffic for them to move into and out of Hester Avenue and assist PTA buses in turning right from Renshaw Boulevard.
Traffic signals are also preferred by pedestrians and cyclists who feel safer crossing where they are able to cross without conflicting traffic. Pedestrian/cycle crossings on Hester Avenue are limited to ‘at grade’ crossings with high levels of opposing traffic, except for a pedestrian underpass located east of Connolly Drive (requiring pedestrians to cross against high traffic volumes on Connolly Drive). The location of RAAFA Cambrai Village on Hester Avenue means that there is a high proportion of elderly residents who require larger gaps in traffic to cross safely, along with part of the catchment for Clarkson Community College being in Merriwa needing to cross Hester Avenue to access the school on foot or by bicycle.
Administration also considered potential queuing at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue. There is approximately 560m east of the Marmion/Hester roundabout and approximately 440m west of the Connolly/Hester roundabout available to accommodate queuing traffic without impacting on the operation of these intersections. Traffic modelling shows that queuing at a roundabout and at traffic signals can be accommodated in the space available without impacting on other intersections on Hester Avenue, Attachment 3 refers.
Based on all of these factors, the City fully supported PTA’s request for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue; however the installation of traffic signals requires approval from MRWA. Although the City has been actively advocating for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue, MRWA has not agreed to the City’s requests, initially indicating that a roundabout should be installed at the City’s cost.
The City does not consider construction of a roundabout at the intersection as the optimal, whole of government solution. Administration will continue to liaise with PTA and MRWA to present a strong case for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue.
PTA indicated to the City and MRWA that they would be forced to make permanent changes to the 483 bus route if traffic signals were not installed at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue. Given the grave impacts this would have on the local community, the Mayor directly approached the Minister for Transport on behalf of residents requesting the installation of traffic signals; however, MRWA did not change its position. Given the continued refusal of MRWA to approve the installation of traffic signals, PTA implemented changes to the 483 bus route on Sunday 30 July 2017 as shown in Attachment 4. The PTA indicated that this change will impact on approximately 130 passengers a day.
The City have enquired whether PTA would be able to continue using the current 438 route by requiring buses to make a U-turn at the roundabout at the Connolly Drive/ Hester Avenue intersection. PTA has stated that they would not consider using the roundabout at Connolly Dr and Hester Ave for the following reasons:
· This would lengthen the route incurring time penalties for passengers and making the service less attractive. This would be a poor outcome for the community given that this is one of the most successful bus routes in the northern suburbs feeder network.
· It would increase the cost of the service provision. Transperth does not currently have resources available for this and thereby would need to make cuts to other services to fund the extension of the route.
The timing of this proposal creates a number of issues for the City. With the Mitchell Freeway extension to Hester Avenue completed in August 2017, any works to this intersection will be done under increased traffic volumes which will significantly increase the cost and complexity of the project and create severe disruptions on the road network. Administration is of the view the works should have been completed by MRWA as part of the freeway extension project and that the City will have to deal with the community concerns regarding the timing of these works.
MRWA has indicated that the offer of $2.4M is for the 2017/18 financial year but that there is the provision to carry forward unspent funding into 2018/19 if the works cannot be completed in this timeframe. MRWA considers the $2.4M to be the total contribution towards the cost of construction and has indicated that all additional costs over this amount would need to be funded by the City. It will be difficult for the City to accommodate a project of this complexity in addition to existing scheduled projects in 2017/18 & 2018/19. As it would have been best for these works to be completed as part of the freeway project, Administration enquired about the possibility whether MRWA could undertake the proposed design and construction works on behalf of the City. MRWA responded that they are facing similar resource constraints and that the City would be solely responsible for the management and implementation of this project.
Administration considers that as the extent of civil work associated with the traffic signals option, offers the best whole of government solution which can be project managed and delivered by the City within the 12 month time period. Administration supports PTA’s position that these works should have been undertaken as part of the Mitchell Freeway extension and based on the City’s delivery timeframe for traffic signals, it is recommended that the City request MRWA changes the offer of funding to allow the City to project manage the design and delivery of traffic signals.
Administration has conducted a brief feasibility study of the proposed roundabout and prepared a concept plan as shown in Attachment 5. During this feasibility study, the following issues were identified:
· Wester Power high voltage distribution poles on the southern side of Hester Avenue may require relocation or crash barrier protection.
· The roundabout will need to be constructed over a gas high pressure main which severely impacts the project. Vibrating equipment is not permitted within 25m of the gas main which will increase costs and time required for compaction.
· Significant drainage modifications may be needed to accommodate the extra cover required at the gas main and to rectify the existing 1m difference in level between the northbound and southbound carriageways of Hester Avenue.
· Telecommunications and fibre optic installations run along Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade. The depth of cables may need to be raised and pit lids levels adjusted.
· There is a 500mm steel water main located on the northern side of Hester Avenue.
· Traffic management will be challenging under the high traffic volumes following the opening of the freeway extension. Total traffic management costs could be as high as 20-30% of the project budget and the community will face ongoing delays to accommodate the works.
· Due to traffic volumes on Hester Avenue the works may need to be scheduled outside normal working hours or night works.
· Although no geotechnical investigations have taken place, previous work in the area has exposed limestone outcrops and cap rock.
· The project may take up to two years to fully investigate, design, consult with the community and complete the works.
Although the offer of $2.4M from MRWA represents a large sum for the construction of a roundabout, a number of potentially costly issues have been identified. Administration is not in a position to confirm the proposed budget of $2.4M is adequate to cover the total costs of this project without preparing a detailed design and cost estimate.
Consultation
No public consultation has been undertaken as part of preparing this report however, should Council decide to proceed with the construction of a roundabout the adjacent residents, Merriwa Primary School, Merriwa Shopping Centre, Peter Moyes Anglican Community School, Quinns Baptist College, Mindarie Senior College and RAAFA Cambrai Village will be consulted in regards to the project.
Comment
There are a number of risks associated with the City accepting the offer by MRWA for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue.
· As the footprint of a roundabout differs significantly from that of a T-intersection, the works required to install a roundabout at the Baltimore Parade/ Hester Avenue intersection are significantly more difficult than those involved in converting a T-intersection to traffic signals. Construction of the proposed roundabout will be much more difficult and will impact the City’s ability to deliver the project in the timeframe required by MRWA. Administration is confident that traffic signals could be delivered in a twelve month timeframe and that the overall cost of the project would be significantly lower than construction of the proposed roundabout;
· The impact on the community in terms of congestion on the road network will be significantly larger during construction of a roundabout compared against installation of traffic signals. Although roadworks would be required for either project, the construction of a roundabout would have more severe impacts and will require Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade to be under temporary traffic management for a much longer period of time;
· To ensure safe operation of the PTA buses and other vehicles, upgrading of the intersection is required now that the freeway is extended to Hester Avenue. It is however considered that a roundabout construction will take significantly longer time period than construction of traffic signals resulting in increased risk to the operation of buses and other vehicles during this period;
· The additional time required to install a roundabout will prevent traffic patterns from stabilising following the opening of the freeway extension. Delays on Hester Avenue would see additional traffic diverted to Connolly Drive and would increase the likelihood and severity of rat running, particularly in Ridgewood. Without a stable traffic pattern, Administration will not be able to accurately assess the need for long term traffic management treatments and pedestrian crossing facilities within the local road network which will delay their delivery to the community;
· Administration has detailed a number of construction risks above which may impact on the cost of delivering a roundabout for the $2.4M proposed by MRWA. MRWA have indicated that any additional costs would need to be met by the City. A detailed design and cost estimate would need to be completed in order for the City to adequately address this risk; and
· In not accepting the offer by MRWA, the City risks the offer being withdrawn. Although a roundabout would not improve traffic flows at Renshaw Boulevard and Burton Drive, or improve pedestrian facilities, modelling by Administration and MRWA suggests that the proposed roundabout at Baltimore / Hester would benefit the community by operating more safely and efficiently than the current T-intersection.
Based an assessment of the risks and benefits associated with this project, Administration considers the following actions provide the greatest overall benefit to the City:
· Considering the extended timeframe for the construction of a roundabout and the associated consequences on the traffic flow on Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade the City should continue to engage with MRWA to install traffic signals at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Hester Avenue;
· The Mayor writes to the Minister for Transport accepting the $2.4M offer from MRWA to be used for installation of traffic signals at the intersection at the earliest possible time; and
· The intersection is reviewed again when the Mitchell Freeway extends beyond Hester Avenue to select the best type of intersection control for the changed traffic pattern.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Leadership Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O23 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
MRWA has indicated that the maximum of $2.4M offered for design and construction of the roundabout is not negotiable. Any cost over this amount would need to be funded by the City and can only be determined after a detailed design is undertaken and the full extent of the underground service adjustments is known. No funding has been allocated in the Long Term Financial Plan for this proposed roundabout.
Considering the reduction in infrastructure works associated with the installation of traffic signals, Administration believes that the offered funding will be sufficient for the installation of traffic signals.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that it is necessary to upgrade the intersection of Hester Avenue/Baltimore Parade to allow the 483 bus route to operate safely on its original alignment and that the reduction in congestion and improvement in safety is also of great benefit to the broader community;
2. NOTES that the upgrading of the intersection of Hester Avenue/Baltimore Parade should have been undertaken as part of the works to extend the Mitchell Freeway;
3. NOTES that the construction of a roundabout can take between 24 months to 30 months whereas, installation of traffic signals will take significantly shorter time period;
4. ACCEPTS the offer of $2.4M from MRWA on the basis of a change to scope to construct of traffic signals at the intersection of Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade;
5. REQUESTS the Mayor to write to the Minister for Transport to advise the Minster of Council’s decision regarding funding and to seek approval for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Hester Avenue and Baltimore Parade advising that the City is available to project manage the design and construction of this project; and
6. SEEKS a further report once the outcome of Resolution 5 is known.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Locality Map - Hester Baltimore |
17/203157 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Hester Avenue Aerial View |
17/229004 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Baltimore / Hester Queue Lengths - T-Intersection, Roundabout and Traffic Signals |
17/249788 |
|
|
4⇩. |
483 Bus Route Changes - Map |
17/249757 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Hester Baltimore Roundabout Concept |
17/228997 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 267
File Ref: 3000V02 – 17/206416
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the potential upgrade options for the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive in Carramar. Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan.
Background
Council, at its meeting of 24 May 2016, considered Item No. AS03-05/16 on Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive intersection, Carramar regarding Agreement in Principle for the installation of Traffic Signals and resolved as follows:
“1. NOTES that Main Roads WA (MRWA) does not support the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive, Carramar;
2. NOTES that a letter has been received from Mr Paul Miles, Member for Wanneroo on 18 May 2016 reflecting Main Roads WA’s advice that a roundabout would be the best option and offering $200,000 in funding for the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive in Carramar;
3. REQUESTS Administration to liaise with Main Roads WA and further review the options for the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive in Carramar and report back to Council;
4. REQUESTS Administration to continue monitoring the intersection of Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive for future reconsideration for traffic signals meeting the required Main Roads WA requirements; and
5. NOTES that a portion of funds ($25,000) allocated under PR-2927 will be carried forward to 2016/17 for undertaking further review of the options and the remaining unexpended funds ($215,000) will form part of the surplus at the end of the financial year.”
Following Council’s resolutions, $25,000 was listed in the City’s 2016/2017 Capital Works Program for undertaking further review of the options for the intersection.
Detail
The Joondalup Drive and Cheriton Drive intersection is currently constructed as a standard T-intersection with a seagull island in the median of Joondalup Drive. The south side of the intersection is predominantly residential with Carramar Village shopping centre, a primary school and a tavern located on the north side of the intersection. Joondalup Drive is a dual carriageway ‘District Distributor A’ road with two lanes in each direction, carrying about 30,000 vehicles per day and operating with posted speed limit of 70km/h. Cheriton Drive is a ‘Local Distributor’ road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and also constructed as a dual carriageway with one lane in each direction, carrying about 3,128 vehicles per day and operating under the default Built Up Area speed limit of 50 km/h.
As per the Council resolution 3, Administration has liaised with Main Roads WA (MRWA) as requested and concluded that installation of Traffic Signals at the intersection is not an option at this time. It was agreed that a roundabout is the most feasible option to be considered for detail design. Administration has now completed a detailed design of the roundabout. Refer Attachment 2, Drawing No 3017-16-A.
While Austroads design guidelines recommends using a circular central island in a roundabout to manage the speed through the roundabout, this could not be achieved due to constraints in the road reserve width and an elliptical shaped central island has been considered for the roundabout design. The central island is 40m wide in East-West direction and 24m wide in North-South direction. This design positions the circulating lanes on the south side close to the shared path; however, allows the tree buffer to remain in place between Joondalup Drive and Palmerston Crescent to the south of the intersection.
Considering the non-standard shape of the roundabout, a third party independent Road Safety Audit has been undertaken to review the safety aspects of the detailed design and the recommendations of the audit have been incorporated as part of finalising the design. The estimated cost for the construction of the designed roundabout is $1.27M. Based on the cost estimate, Administration has undertaken a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis which produced a result of $0.31, i.e. for the cost of $1 the benefit received will be $0.31. As a result, it does not qualify for external funding submission, such as Black Spot Grants.
A similar elliptical shaped roundabout has been constructed by MRWA at the intersection of Marmion Avenue and Mullaloo Drive as shown in Attachment 3.
Consultation
Consultation with relevant internal and external stakeholders including Western Power has been conducted in developing the roundabout design. No public consultation has been undertaken for the preparation of this report. If Council decides to proceed with the project, the adjacent affected residents and businesses will be informed about the decision and consultation/information sessions will be conducted during the project delivery stage, which is dependent on the allocation of funds in the Long Term Capital Works Program.
Comment
While a modified designed roundabout is constructible at the intersection, considering the low BCR result, Administration does not consider the construction of a roundabout at Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive intersection to be a high priority given the number of projects in the area that are likely to affect the traffic pattern at this intersection.
Projects scheduled in the vicinity include:
1. Grade separation of the intersection of Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive with construction starting in mid-2018;
2. Upgrading of Wanneroo Road between Joondalup Drive and Flynn Drive to 4 lane dual carriageway with construction starting in mid-late 2017;
3. Mitchell Freeway extension to Hester Avenue opened earlier this month, and has new connections to the Freeway via Flynn Drive - Neerabup Road; and
4. Pinjar Road extension to Flynn Drive with a tentative Developer given construction timeframe of 2017/18.
Administration considers that the extension of the Mitchell Freeway will provide an alternative route to the freeway via Flynn Drive and Neerabup Road and should reduce traffic demand on Joondalup Drive leading to a reduction in congestion. Additionally, the opening of Pinjar Road and Flynn Drive intersection and future grade separation at the Joondalup Drive/Wanneroo Road intersection is likely to change the traffic patterns surrounding
Carramar, Tapping and Banksia Grove. Furthermore, the upgrading of Wanneroo Road is likely to redistribute some traffic from Cheriton Drive/Joondalup Drive to Golf Links Drive/Wanneroo Road intersection. Some traffic is also expected to be redistributed through the intersection of Golf Links Drive/Pinjar Road.
Administration has been made aware that MRWA are undertaking a comprehensive traffic study/modelling for several intersections along Joondalup Drive including Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive to help inform the design development for the Wanneroo Road/ Joondalup Drive grade separation project. The study will include video surveys and SIDRA intersection analysis of Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive to model the anticipated effect of future increases in traffic demand along Joondalup Drive. This traffic modelling will give the City insight into the potential impacts of the grade separation on Tapping Primary School, St Stephens School and Carramar Primary School. The traffic study is scheduled to be completed by the end of October 2017 and full details have been included in Attachment 4.
The traffic study is being undertaken as part of the Wanneroo Road/Joondalup Drive grade separation project and may recommend some modifications at Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive intersection. Should that be the case, it is recommended that such works could form part of the grade separation project to be undertaken by MRWA. If the traffic study does not recommend any modifications at Joondalup Drive/Cheriton Drive intersection, it is suggested that in view of the imminent changes in the road network and subsequent changes in the traffic flow pattern in the area that a report be presented to Council in February 2018 once Administration has analysed the results of MRWA’s traffic modelling. Additionally, it is recommended that the City contact MRWA and request that they hold a community information session regarding the impacts of the Wanneroo Road/Joondalup Drive grade separation project on the local road network.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost for the construction of the designed roundabout is estimated at $1.27M. This project and funding is not listed in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program.
Voting Requirements
Simply Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that Main Roads WA (MRWA) is conducting traffic modelling at Cheriton Drive in relation to the grade separation of Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive which is scheduled for completion in October 2017;
2. REQUESTS Administration to analyse the results of MRWA traffic modelling and present a Report to Council in February 2018; and
3. REQUESTS MRWA holds a consultation with the community regarding the impacts on the local road network as a result of the grade separation of Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Location Map - Joondalup Drive & Cheriton Drive Intersection, Carramar |
15/552024 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Joondalup Cheriton Drwg No 3017-16-A.pdf |
17/230442 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Intersection of Marmion Avenue and Mullaloo Drive aerial photograph |
17/207764 |
|
|
4⇩. |
MRWA Traffic Modelling - Joondalup Drive / Wanneroo Road Grade Separation |
17/249809 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 276
AS03-08/17 Petition
No PT04-05/17 - Requesting the Installation of
Speed Humps and Speed Limit Signage on Charnwood Avenue, Two Rocks
File Ref: 3120V03 – 17/257082
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider Petition No PT04-05/17 requesting the installation of speed humps and speed limit signage on Charnwood Avenue, Two Rocks. Refer Attachment 1 for a location map of the area.
Background
Council received petition PT04-05/17 at its meeting on 30 May 2017. The petition has 59 signatures and reads as follows:
“We the undersigned are requesting immediate action to prevent the death or injury to the youngsters who use the park, known as Charnwood Park. The park has been there for over 25 years and since it was opened there has been a playground and a skate park added. Coupled with the increase in the population the park is now a very popular destination. There is a vehicle access running along the south side of the park that is Charnwood Avenue, it is approximately 400 metres long, the park runs for about half the length of the road. This roadway is frequented by many vehicles at all times of the day. There are three walkways that open onto Charnwood Avenue and they are on the South side of the roadway and are all uphill from the roadway, hence any person who uses these lanes to enter or cross Charnwood Avenue is going downhill.
The main traffic using these walkways is kids and frequently pets. When kids enter the walkways they are either on a pushbike or a skateboard, the latter going downhill and not always in full control. There is also a short Street, Daines Street which is also a very much used thoroughfare to the park. Fortunately we have only had two only minor mishaps with our kids that we are aware of.
On the weekends the is a very much frequented venue to parents who bring their kids to the playground for a family day out and picnic and as any parent would know kids can slip out of your grasp in a flash and there is no formal parking area, parents park on the grass verge a few feet from the road. There have been numerous “close calls” with vehicles travelling at speed. The writer has lived in Charnwood Avenue for 19 years and has seen many of these near disasters.
We suggest that two strategically placed speed humps with the appropriate 50 Km signs would be a very positive pro-active initiative. After all, a child’s life against a multimillion dollar land development, which is more important?”
Detail
Charnwood Avenue, Two Rocks operates as a Local Access road within the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy. The roadway width varies from around 7.2m to 7.6m, with a 1.2m pathway constructed on the northern side between Lisford Avenue and Candler Way.
The petition raises two main areas of concern regarding Charnwood Avenue, speeding vehicles and pedestrian safety. Administration has investigated these issues with respect to relevant standards, guidelines and policies.
There are three reserved PAWs on Charnwood Avenue which connect with Brodia Place, Emba Place and Orissa Place. The accesses to Emba Place and Orissa Place have footpaths constructed and designated pedestrian crossing points on Charnwood Avenue. On site, it was noted that both of these footpaths are steep and have U-rails installed at both ends. U-rails were a common treatment at the time to prevent wheeled vehicles from transitioning between the pathway and road at speed. The footpath linking to Emba Place is missing a connection on the northern side of Charnwood Avenue.
No path has been constructed in the reserved PAW connecting to Brodia Place. It is considered that the topography at this location would make it impossible to construct a pathway to meet the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act.
In addition to the PAWs, there is a 1.2m footpath connection on Daines Road which crosses Charnwood Avenue.
Pedestrian Crossing Sight Distance (CSD) was measured at the crossing points for each of the PAWs and at the Daines Road crossing. All pedestrian connections were found to comply with the Crossing Sight Distance requirements of Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4 A: Unsignalised and Signalised Intersections.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Administration has undertaken a site investigation to measure the sight distance for all PAW’s and footpaths on Charnwood Avenue. All designated crossing points were assessed for adequate Crossing Sight Distance (CSD) as per Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4A: Unsignalised and Signalised Intersections. CSD requires that a clear view be maintained between approaching drivers and pedestrians on the crossing or waiting to cross. All crossings were found to have adequate CSD based on the 85th percentile speed for Charnwood Avenue.
The petition raised concerns about children losing control on the PAWs and entering Charnwood Avenue at speed and out of control. Although the two constructed PAWs connecting to Emba Place and Orissa Place are steep, U-rails have been provided to deter wheeled vehicles from approaching Charnwood Avenue at speed.
Administration considers that these crossing points operate with an appropriate level of safety and does not consider that significant upgrades are warranted at this time. Administration does recognise the need for a footpath connection to be constructed on the northern side of Charnwood Avenue, connecting with the Emba Place PAW and recommends that these works be undertaken under PR-2707 Minor Pathway Projects – Unspecified 2017/2018.
Given the large number of requests that the City receives for the installation of traffic treatments, the City’s has developed a Local Area Traffic Management Policy (LATMP) which provides an objective assessment based a range of factors including:
· Speed data;
· Traffic volume including commercial vehicle volume;
· Crash history;
· Road design and topography;
· Presence of vulnerable road users such as pedestrian/cyclists; and
· Activity generators such as schools/retail/train stations etc.
This policy guides the decision making process to determine whether roads require infrastructure changes or increased policing. The Policy requires a score of over 60 to qualify for traffic management treatments, while scores between 30 and 60 points warrant attention to law enforcement and driver education.
An assessment of Charnwood Avenue was undertaken in accordance with this Policy with a Traffic Management Score (TMS) of 20 being calculated. According to the LATMP, traffic treatments are not warranted on Charnwood Avenue ahead of other high priority projects.
Regarding the request for the installation of 50 km/h speed signs, the City is not able to proceed with this request as Main Roads WA (MRWA) is the only State authority that installs regulatory signage. MRWA has a long held policy not to install 50km/h speed signage where the default “built-up area” speed limit applies.
Administration considers that Charnwood Avenue is operating safely, which is reflected in the available crash data which reveals that there were no reported crashes on Charnwood Avenue for the five year period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016.
Therefore, the provision of speed humps and speed limit signage is not supported by Administration. It is recommended that works on Charnwood Avenue be restricted to the provision of a footpath connection linking to the Emba Place PAW.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy was used to assess this request.
Financial Implications
The installation of a footpath connection on the northern side of Charnwood Avenue, linking to the Emba Place PAW would cost in the order of $2,500. This can be funded from the PR-2707 Minor Pathway Projects – Unspecified.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT APPROVE the request made in Petition PT04-05/17 to install speed humps and speed limit signage on Charnwood Avenue.
2. APPROVES the installation of a footpath connection on Charnwood Avenue between the Emba Place PAW and the Charnwood Avenue footpath to be funded from PR-2707 Minor Pathway Projects - Unspecified.
3. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Charnwood Park - Location Map |
17/185282 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 281
File Ref: 3120V03 – 17/232381
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider projects submitted for funding through the 2018/2019 State and Federal Government Black Spot Programs.
Background
The State and Federal Governments have both committed to reductions in casualty crashes on Australian roads through Black Spot Programs. These programs are primarily reactive and target road locations where crashes have occurred, although some allowance is made for proactive applications supported by a formal Road Safety Audit (RSA).
Detail
An invitation for submissions for the 2018/2019 State and Federal Government Black Spot Programs was issued by Main Roads WA (MRWA) in April 2017, with a closing date of 14 July 2017. To assist with the preparation of submissions, MRWA provided access to the Crash Analysis Reporting System and the crash data for the five-year period 2012 to 2016 in May 2017. The crash data is provided to MRWA by the WA Police and the Insurance Council of Australia.
The Black Spot Program Development and Management Guidelines require Black Spot projects based on crash data to meet a minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) to ensure the proposed remedial works are cost effective. The BCR is the ratio of the benefit to the community of the expected reduction in crashes versus the cost of the proposed remedial treatment.
Successful State Government Black Spot projects are funded two-thirds by the Program and one-third by local government and are based on all recorded crashes, fatalities, casualties and property damage. The criteria for the program are as follows:
· For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is five crashes over a five-year period.
· For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is average of two crashes per kilometre per five-year period.
· Value of works between $2,000 and $3,000,000.
· Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 1.0.
Successful Australian Government Black Spot projects are fully funded by the Program and are based on casualty crashes, fatalities or personal injury. The criteria for the program are as follows:
· For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is three casualty crashes over a five-year period.
· For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is 0.65 casualty crashes per kilometre per five years period.
· Value of works between $2,000 and $2,000,000.
· Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 2.0.
Administration has investigated the qualifying crash locations for both programs to determine the appropriate remedial treatments and associated costs.
Dependent on the proposed treatment, cost and the resultant BCR, projects are nominated for either or both the State and Australian Government Black Spot programs. Funding for proactive projects, where potential hazards exist, is also available where supported by a Road Safety Audit.
It is anticipated that the Metropolitan Regional Road Group (MRRG) will assess nominations between July and October 2017 and that the Minister for Transport will announce the approved projects in May 2018 to allow Council sufficient time to finalise the 2018/19 budget.
The projects submitted to Main Roads WA for funding consideration by the 14 July 2017 deadline, including their traffic/road safety issues and the proposed remedial treatments are as follows:
1. Kingsbridge Boulevard/Camborne Parkway/Shelford Boulevard Intersection, Butler (refer Attachment 1 page 1)
Concern
Kingsbridge Boulevard and Camborne Parkway are both ‘Local Distributor’ Roads and Shelford Boulevard is a ‘Access’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and are constructed as two-lane single carriageways. All roads have a posted speed limit of 50 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of right angle crashes. There have been a total of 10 crashes over five years of which 3 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
A Road Safety Audit was conducted at this intersection which recommended investigating methods to reduce vehicle speeds on approach to the roundabout and increase readability of the roundabout. This project proposes to review landscaping and on-street parking to ensure readability of the roundabout, change the roundabout geometry to limit vehicle entry speeds and to provide on-ramps and off-ramps for cyclists. The project cost was estimated at $50,000 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
2. Wesco Road, Nowergup (refer Attachment 1 page 3)
Concern
Wesco Road is a ‘Local Distributor’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a two-lane single carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 110 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of off-path crashes. There have been a total of 8 crashes over five years of which 2 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install guideposts to improve delineation on Wesco Road. In addition, install edgeline marking and RRPM’s and remove vegetation from verge. The project cost was estimated at $220,000 with a BCR of 4.56 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
3. Marmion Avenue/Hester Avenue/Anchorage Drive North Intersection, Merriwa (refer Attachment 1 page 7)
Concern
Marmion Avenue and Hester Avenue are both ‘District Distributor A’ Roads in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and are constructed as four-lane dual carriageways. Anchorage North is classified as a Local Distributor Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated two-lane road with a short section on the approach and departure lanes at the roundabout constructed with four lanes. The roundabout in question has two circulating lanes and an internal diameter of 50 m. Marmion Avenue has a posted speed limit of 80km/h, Hester Avenue has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h and Anchorage Drive North has a posted speed limit of 50 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of rear end, right angle and off-path crashes. There have been a total of 144 crashes over five years of which 23 have resulted in casualties. The City also received a number of enquiries from residents suggesting they experienced skidding off at the roundabout.
Treatment
Install skid resistant surface treatment to the Marmion Avenue approaches and the Hester Avenue approach, within the circulating lanes of the roundabout and for 30m on all departure lanes. The project cost was estimated at $350,000 with a BCR of 1.26 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding.
4. Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks (refer Attachment 1 page 9)
Concern
Breakwater Drive is a ‘District Distributor B’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a two-lane single carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 110 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of off-path crashes. There have been a total of 10 crashes over five years of which 3 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install guideposts to improve delineation on Breakwater Drive and remove vegetation from the verge. The project cost was estimated at $60,000 with a BCR of 5.82 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the casualty crash requirement of Australian Government funding.
5. Ocean Reef Road/ Hartman Drive/Lenore Road Intersection, Wangara (refer Attachment 1 page 15)
Concern
Ocean Reef Road and Hartman drive are both ‘District Distributor A’ Roads in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and are constructed as median separated four-lane dual carriageways. Lenore Road is classified as a ‘District Distributor B’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated four-lane dual carriageway. Ocean Reef Road has a posted speed limit of 80km/h and Hartman Drive and Lenore Road have posted speed limits of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of rear end crashes. There have been a total of 103 crashes over five years of which 13 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install skid resistant surface treatment and mast arms to all approaches. The project cost was estimated at $360,000 with a BCR of 2.84 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
6. Beach Road and Alexander Drive Intersection, Koondoola (refer Attachment 1 page 17)
Concern
Beach Road and Alexander Drive are both ‘District Distributor A’ Roads in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and are constructed as median separated four-lane dual carriageways. Both roads have a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of rear end and slope related crashes. There have been a total of 132 crashes over five years of which 26 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install skid resistant surface treatment on through and left movement and mast arm on the west approach. The project cost was estimated at $100,000 with a BCR of 2.41 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
7. Marangaroo Drive Between Callison Way and Shelvock Crescent, Alexander Heights (refer Attachment 1 page 19)
Concern
Marangaroo Drive is a ‘District Distributor A’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated four-lane dual carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of off-path crashes on a straight in the wet. There have been a total of 9 crashes over five years of which 2 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
A Road Safety Audit was conducted at this section of road. This project proposes to install skid resistant surface treatment on the through lanes on the west approach. While the Road Safety Audit did not specifically recommend the installation of skid resistant treatment, it highlighted the existence of a dip within the road profile which obstructs drainage. This issue will be addressed before installation of the skid resistant treatment by asphalting the existing road. The project cost was estimated at $105,000 with a BCR of 1.24 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding.
8. Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive Intersection, Gnangara (refer Attachment 1 page 21)
Concern
Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive are both ‘District Distributor A’ Roads in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and are constructed as median separated four-lane dual carriageways. Gnangara Road has a posted speed limit of 80 km/h and Alexander Drive has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of rear end crashes. There have been a total of 38 crashes over five years of which 4 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install skid resistant surface treatment and mast arms on the east and west approaches. The project cost was estimated at $180,000 with a BCR of 1.50 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding.
9. Kingsway Stage 3 – Between Sovrano Avenue/ Bellerive Boulevard and Hartman Drive, Madeley (refer Attachment 1 page 23)
Concern
Kingsway is a ‘Local Distributor’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a two-lane single carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 60 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of rear end crashes. There have been a total of 23 crashes over five years of which 7 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install a raised central median and indented right-turn slip lanes. In addition, upgrade existing street lighting and remove road side hazards. The project cost was estimated at $492,000 with a BCR of 2.57 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding. In accordance with the Council resolution of AS04-05/16, this project is listed in the City’s Draft Long Term Capital Works Program (LTCWP) for 2018/19.
10. Prindiville Drive Between Wanneroo Road and Hartman Drive, Wangara (refer Attachment 1 page 25)
Concern
Prindiville Drive is a ‘Local Distributor’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated two-lane single carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 50 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of pedestrian crashes. There have been a total of 91 crashes over five years of which 25 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install a shared path on the north side between Wanneroo Road and Chokolich Street and both sides from Irwin Road to Hartman Drive. In addition, upgrade the existing footpath to a shared path on the south side from Wanneroo Road to Ismail Street and on the north side from Chokolich Street to Ismail Street. Additionally, install a Pedestrian refuge between Mackie Street and Ismail Street and between Hartman Drive and Berriman Drive. The project cost was estimated at $690,000 with a BCR of 2.22 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
11. Wanneroo Road Between Ocean Reef Road and Hepburn Avenue, Madeley/ Woodvale (refer Attachment 1 page 28)
Concern
Wanneroo Road is a ‘Primary’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated four-lane dual carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of pedestrian crashes. There have been a total of 798 crashes over five years of which 149 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install a 3m wide red asphalt shared path on the west side between Hepburn Avenue and Ocean Reef Road and install a 2.5m wide concrete shared path on the east side between Kingsway and Hepburn Avenue. The project cost was estimated at $1,300,000 with a BCR of 2.4 and applied for both State and Australian Government funding.
The following three projects will be staged, with funding allocated over the two financial years 2018/19 and 2019/20.The staged approach was chosen due to the amount of work involved with each of the projects. During 2018/19 funding will be allocated for the design and documentation of the projects with construction taking place during 2019/20.
12. Wanneroo Road Between Elliot Road and Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo/Pearsall (refer Attachment 1 page 38)
Concern
Wanneroo Road is a ‘Primary’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated four-lane dual carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of pedestrian crashes. There have been a total of 330 crashes over five years of which 67 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Install a 2.5m wide concrete path on the east side between Villanova Street and East Road, install a 3 metre wide red asphalt shared path on the west side between East Road and Scenic Drive. Also install a 2.5m concrete shared path on the east side between Scenic Drive and Kirkstall Drive and a 2.5m shared path on the east side form Gungurru Avenue to Jacaranda Drive. In addition, install a Pedestrian crossing point north of the Villanova Street and Wanneroo Road intersection. The project cost was estimated at $950,000 with a BCR of 1.55 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding. During 2018/19 an estimated $108,000 of the estimated total cost is for the design and documentation of the project. Construction during 2019/20 is estimated to cost $842,000.
13. Wanneroo Road Between Conlan Avenue/Hasting Street and Elliot Road, Wanneroo (refer Attachment 1 page 43)
Concern
Wanneroo Road is a ‘Primary’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated four-lane dual carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of pedestrian crashes. There have been a total of 117 crashes over five years of which 21 have resulted in casualties.
Treatment
Upgrade the existing footpath to a 3m shared path on the west side and install a pedestrian crossing at Sinagra Street. The project cost was estimated at $550,000 with a BCR of 1.38 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding. During 2018/19 an estimated $227,000 of the estimated total cost is for the design and documentation of the project. Construction during 2019/20 is estimated to cost $323,000.
14. Templeton Crescent Between Liddell Street and Marangaroo Drive, Girrawheen (refer Attachment 1 page 46)
Concern
Templeton Crescent is a ‘Local Distributor’ Road in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy and is constructed as a median separated two-lane single carriageway. The road has a posted speed limit of 70 km/h.
The five year crash data indicates a high number of pedestrian crashes. There have been a total of 25 crashes over five years of which 1 has resulted in a casualty.
Treatment
Upgrade the existing footpath to a shared path on the north and west side between Liddell Street and Allison Drive, and between Balgonie Avenue and Hudson Avenue. The project cost was estimated at $175,000 with a BCR of 1.25 and applied for State funding only. This project does not meet the BCR requirement of Australian Government funding. During 2018/19 an estimated $12,000 of the estimated total cost is for the design and documentation of the project. Construction during 2019/20 is estimated to cost $163,000.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The projects selected have been identified as these best meet the grant funding programs’ selection and assessment criteria and enables the City to maximise the opportunity for funding under the competitive process. Where the qualifying crash location involved a distributor road already listed for major upgrade and where the Black Spot treatment would
|
PROJECT |
BCR |
Project |
CoW |
State |
Project |
CoW |
State |
Federal |
|
1. Kingsbridge Boulevard/ Camborne Parkway/ Shelford Boulevard Intersection |
RSA |
$50,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$50,000 |
|
2. Wesco Road |
4.56 |
$220,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$220,000 |
|
3. Marmion Avenue/ Hester Avenue Intersection |
1.26 |
$350,000 |
$116,667 |
$233,333 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
4. Breakwater Drive |
5.82 |
$60,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$60,000 |
|
5. Ocean Reef Road/ Hartman Drive/ Lenore Road Intersection |
2.84 |
$360,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$360,000 |
|
6. Beach Road/ Alexander Drive Intersection |
2.41 |
$100,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$100,000 |
|
7. Marangaroo Drive Between Callison Way and Shelvock Crescent |
1.24 |
$105,000 |
$35,000 |
$70,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
8. Gnangara Road/ Alexander Drive Intersection |
1.5 |
$180,000 |
$60,000 |
$120,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
9. Kingsway Stage 3 Between Sovrano Avenue/ Bellerive Boulevard and Hartman Drive (Listed in Draft LTCWP) |
2.57 |
$492,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$492,000 |
|
10. Prindiville Drive Between Wanneroo Road and Hartman Drive |
2.22 |
$690,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$690,000 |
|
11. Wanneroo Road Between Ocean Reef Road and Hepburn Avenue |
2.4 |
$1,300,000 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$1,300,000 |
|
12. Wanneroo Road Between Elliot Road and Ocean Reef Road |
1.55 |
$108,000 |
$36,000 |
$72,000 |
$842,000 |
$280,667 |
$561,333 |
N/A |
|
13. Wanneroo Road Between Conlan Avenue/ Hastings Street and Elliot Road |
1.38 |
$227,000 |
$75,667 |
$151,333 |
$323,000 |
$107,667 |
$215,333 |
N/A |
|
14. Templeton Crescent Between Liddell Street and Marangaroo Drive |
1.28 |
$12,000 |
$4,000 |
$8,000 |
$163,000 |
$54,333 |
$108,667 |
N/A |
|
TOTAL: |
$4,254,000 |
$327,333 |
$654,666 |
$1,328,000 |
$442,667 |
$885,334 |
$3,272,000 |
|
have a life of less than five years then these Black Spots was not considered justified.
Based on previous years Black Spot grant funding submissions, the projects listed for 2018/19 have a medium to high potential of success. Should the City be unsuccessful in receiving grant funding for the Black Spot projects, these will be continue to be monitored, listed in the City’s Draft LTCWP for consideration and prioritized accordingly.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.2 Safe Communities
1.2.1 Enable community to be prepared and to recover from emergency situations”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A summary of the estimated costs of the proposed Black Spot treatments is tabled above. It should be noted that the full cost of the project is reflected under ‘Federal Cost’ on the assumption that it will be approved.
Projects approved under the Australian Government Black Spot Program are fully funded by the program, however, those projects that don’t receive Federal Government funding may be successful for State Black Spot funding. Successful project nominations in the 2018/2019 State Black Spot Program are required to be funded one-third by the City.
Subject to the City being successful with all its applications through either the Federal or State Black Spot Program, City will be required to contribute a maximum amount of $1,418,000, towards the total cost of $4,254,000, in 2018/2019 and $442,667 in 2019/2020. The current funding allocation for Black Spot projects listed in the current Draft LTCWP for 2018/2019 includes a total amount of $4,304,000 with $589,333 from municipal funds, with $445,000 required funding made available for 2019/2020. Depending on the success of the project applications under these programs, the City may need to allocate a maximum of $1,418,000 municipal funding in 2018/2019 Capital Works Budget and an additional $445,000 in municipal funding in 2019/2020 Capital Works Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the submission of the following City of Wanneroo projects for funding consideration as part of the 2018/19 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs:
a) Kingsbridge Boulevard/ Camborne Parkway/Shelford Boulevard Intersection, Butler - Review landscaping and on-street parking, change the roundabout geometry and provide on-ramps and off-ramps for cyclists;
b) Marmion Avenue/ Hester Avenue/Anchorage Drive North Intersection, Merriwa - Install skid resistant surface treatment;
c) Wesco Road, Nowergup - Install guideposts, edgeline marking and RRPM’s and remove vegetation from verge;
d) Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks - Install guideposts and remove vegetation from verge;
e) Ocean Reef Road/ Hartman Drive/ Lenore Road Intersection, Wangara - Install skid resistant surface treatment and mast arms;
f) Beach Road and Alexander Drive Intersection, Koondoola - Install skid resistant surface treatment and mast arms;
g) Marangaroo Drive Between Callison Way and Shelvock Crescent, Alexander Heights - Install skid resistant surface treatment;
h) Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive Intersection, Gnangara - Install skid resistant surface treatment and mast arms;
i) Kingsway Stage 3 – Between Sovrano Avenue/ Bellerive Boulevard and Hartman Drive, Madeley - Install a raised central median and indented right-turn slip lanes, upgrade street lighting and remove road side hazards;
j) Wanneroo Road Between Ocean Reef Road and Hepburn Avenue, Madeley/ Woodvale - Install a 3m wide red asphalt shared path on the west side between Hepburn Avenue and Ocean Reef Road and install a 2.5m wide concrete shared path on the east side between Kingsway and Hepburn Avenue;
k) Prindiville Drive Between Wanneroo Road and Hartman Drive, Wangara – Install a shared path on the north side, upgrade the existing footpath to a shared path on the south side and install a Pedestrian refuge;
l) Wanneroo Road Between Elliot Road and Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo/ Pearsall - Install a 2.5m wide concrete path on the east side between Villanova Street and East Road, install a 3m wide red asphalt shared path on the west side between East Road and Scenic Drive. Also install a 2.5m concrete shared path on the east side between Scenic Drive and Kirkstall Drive and a 2.5m shared path on the east side form Gungurru Avenue to Jacaranda Drive. In addition, install a Pedestrian crossing point;
m) Wanneroo Road Between Conlan Avenue/Hasting Street and Elliot Road, Wanneroo - Upgrade existing footpath to 3m Shared path and install pedestrian crossing;
n) Templeton Crescent Between Liddell Street and Marangaroo Drive, Girrawheen - Upgrade existing footpath to shared path; and
2. NOTES that the draft 2018/19 Traffic Treatments Program in the Long Term Capital Works Program will require amendment to reflect the funding of projects approved through the 2018/19 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Black Spot Funding Applications 2018 to 2019 |
17/273725 |
|
Infrastructure Capital Works
File Ref: 29045 – 17/246190
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider State Government $23M funding for the dualling of Marmion Avenue to Yanchep.
Background
Council considered a report at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 6 December 2016 (Item AS01-12/16 refers) on the reclassification of Marmion Avenue and Ocean Reef Road as Primary Distributors roads under State Government control.
The report recognised the importance of Yanchep as a Strategic Centre and detailed traffic concerns, including the need to advance the dualling of Marmion Avenue to Yanchep Beach Road, refer to Attachment 1. In considering this report, Council resolved to:
“That Council:-
1. RECOGNISES the importance of Yanchep as a Strategic Metropolitan Centre and SEEKS the reclassification of Marmion Avenue Ocean Reef Road and Gnangara Road as Primary Distributor Roads by the State Government;
2. SEEKS a timely dualling of Marmion Avenue to Yanchep Beach Road by the State Government or alternately the provision of State funding to the City to undertake the dualling as a high priority;
3. RECOGNISES the importance of Ellenbrook as a Secondary Centre and SEEKS the reclassification of Ocean Reef Road and Gnangara Road as Primary Distributor Roads by the State Government;
4. REQUESTS that the Mayor writes to the Honourable Premier and Minister for Transport on Items 1, 2 and 3; and
5. REQUESTS the Chief Executive Officer to write to Cities of Joondalup and Swan, seeking their support for these road reclassification requests.”
Resolutions 4 and 5; letters were written to the then Premier and the Minister for Transport. As a consequence, prior to the State election held in March 2017, the WA Labor Party promised funding of $23M for the dualling of Marmion Avenue as an election commitment.
This report considers the details of funding now provided to the City and the proposed program to develop and deliver this project.
Detail
Marmion Avenue is constructed as a four-lane dual carriageway between Tamala Park and Camborne Parkway and the remaining 11.5km section is a two-lane single carriageway between Camborne Parkway and Yanchep. Traffic volumes for Marmion Avenue range from a peak Average Weekday Traffic (AWT) of 18,000 vehicles per day south of Alkimos to around 12,000 vehicles per day in Yanchep. Works to upgrade Marmion Avenue to a four-lane dual carriageway between Lukin Drive and Butler Boulevard have recently been completed.
Following the State Election in March 2017, Administration wrote to the Minister for Transport and requested information on the allocation of this funding to enable the City to prepare the project schedule. Main Roads WA requested a tax invoice during the last week of June 2017 and a payment of $23M was received by the City prior to 30 Jun 2017. The $23M funding has been received by the City and accounted for as “restricted cash”.
Subject to Council’s consideration of, and acceptance of this funding, Administration has progressed the preparation of a project mandate/plan to enable the completion of a detailed design, consultation and other project development work in 2017/2018 with construction completion by December 2019. The project development will consider the following key items:
· City of Wanneroo standard design layout for a dual carriageway inclusive of traffic modelling, drainage, shared paths and cycle lanes, bus bays and bus shelters, pedestrian crossings, street lighting including an investigation of LED Lighting and a holistic landscape plan with themed tree species in the median and complementary verge planting;
· Stakeholder identification and consultation; and
· Planning/Policy constraints, opportunities or risks.
Administration is working with Main Roads WA to determine any project specific or reporting requirements in relation to the State Government funding.
It is also noted that the project development and delivery will be undertaken by following the City’s Project Management Framework and will require a new fixed term resource (Project Manager).
Consultation
Initial consultation has been held with the relevant service units and Main Roads WA. Subsequent consultation with all identified stakeholders will occur during the project development and delivery of this project.
Comment
In view of the importance of Yanchep as a rapidly growing Strategic Centre and anticipated high traffic volumes using Marmion Avenue, the dualling of Marmion Avenue to Yanchep is an important project with the design phase scheduled to be complete by September 2018 and the construction phase scheduled for completion by January 2020.
The City is working in partnership with State Government to deliver the key infrastructure and will continue to liaise directly with Main Roads WA regarding finalisation of project reporting and budgetary parameters.
Administration will write to MRWA seeking its approval for the reallocation $3.34M of current and planned MRRG funds to augment the $23M project budget.
It is therefore recommended that Council accepts the $23M State Government funding to upgrade Marmion Avenue to a four lane dual carriageway from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep (subject to funding availability).
Statutory Compliance
Potential external approvals by Government agencies and utility providers.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Leadership Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The project development will give due consideration to appropriate policies including Local Planning Policy 3.8 - Marmion Ave Arterial Road Access adopted on 21 July 2015.
Financial Implications
The upgrade of 11.5km section of Marmion Avenue to a four lane dual carriageway from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep is estimated to cost $23M and with the provision of State Government funding of $23M, plus the City will be seeking from Main Roads, the retention of the current Metropolitan Regional Road Group (MRRG) funding allocation of $3.34M
In line with the project noted earlier in the report and to manage the cash flow, funding is required to be allocated over two financial years as noted below:
2017/18 Design and project development $700,000
2018/19 Civil construction works $20M
2019/20 Landscaping and ancillary works $2.3M
Marmion Avenue dualling from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep is not listed in the approved 2017/2018 Capital Works Budget. A budget variation to allocate an unbudgeted expenditure of $700,000 (funded from the $23M funding received from the State Government) for this project is necessary for Council to authorise Administration to commence the procurement process for the design and development of the project. The remaining $22.3M State Government funding will be held as “restricted cash” and will be included in the Long Term Capital Works Program for allocation in the annual budgets accordingly.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS $23M State Government funding for the upgrade of Marmion Avenue to a four lane dual carriageway from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep (subject to funding availability);
2. APPROVES, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the unbudgeted expenditure of $700,000 in 2017/2018, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for the Upgrade of Marmion Avenue to a four lane dual carriageway from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep;
3. Administration WRITES to State Government seeking approval to reallocate current MRRG funding to augment the $23M budget for the four lane dual carriageway from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep; and
4. NOTES the following budget amendment to reflect receipt of additional funds from the State Government:
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Revised Budget |
|
Design the dual carriageway between Camborne Parkway to Yanchep in 2017/2018. |
TBC |
$0 |
$700,000 |
|
Restricted Cash Account |
TBC |
$0 |
$22,300,000 |
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Location Plan - Marmion Avenue |
17/264220 |
|
Parks & Conservation Management
File Ref: 3570 – 17/213195
Responsible Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider PT01-05/17, Objection to the Removal of Trees on the verge of Peaslake Street Butler.
Background
At its meeting on 9 May, Council received a petition with 11 signatures requesting that the City reconsiders its proposal to remove the four Platanus acerifolia (London Plane) trees from the City’s verge of Peaslake Street. The petition read:
“We the undersigned residents of Peaslake Street, Butler, whole heartedly disagree with your plan to remove the trees from our street. This is a mistake that was decided upon to rectify a grievance or previous decision and we don’t feel we should have to endure the consequences”.
Earlier in the year, the City received a complaint from a resident on Peaslake Street, Butler, regarding an ongoing problem with the tree located on the verge adjacent to their property causing damage to infrastructure, lifting concrete footpaths, resident’s driveway and retaining wall. The resident was also concerned with the ongoing costs to the City to continually replace the sections of footpath should all four trees remain within the street.
Detail
All 11 petitioners are residents of Peaslake Street and 3 of the residents have a London Plane tree on the verge adjacent to their property.
Administration undertook site investigations in February 2017 which identified that there were only four verge trees in the street - refer to Attachments 1 and 2 for the photos of the individual trees and location map. The inspection identified that sections of footpath adjacent to each tree had recently been replaced. A number of trees appeared to have suffered root damage during the footpath construction; which may be detrimental to the future health of these trees. A decision was made to remove the four trees to alleviate future damage to infrastructure and engage with residents in the replacement of the trees and increasing the tree canopy within Peaslake Street, Butler.
A letter drop was undertaken on 29 March 2017 advising residents that due to damage being caused to the infrastructure within the streetscape, the City had made the decision to remove the four London Plane trees. Residents were also informed that the trees would be replaced and that the City would engage with the residents on replacement and additional tree planting within the streetscape.
Administration met on site with the petitioner on 7 April 2017 to discuss the rationale behind the proposed tree removal. During this meeting, Administration carried out a secondary inspection of the trees and informed the resident that an independent arboriculture inspection of the trees would be undertaken prior to any removal. A separate meeting was held with another resident on 6 April 2017 that did not support the removal of the trees, however was supportive of the planting of additional trees within the street.
Administration engaged an independent arborist to inspect the four London Plane trees on Peaslake Street, assess the trees’ health and overall structural condition and the associated risks of the trees in this environment using the Quantified Tree Risk Assessment methodology; and provide recommendations accordingly. The arborist made the following recommendations:
· No tree removal at this time in Peaslake Street;
· Undertake formative pruning to improve the structure of the trees; and
· Undertake annual inspections of the four trees to monitor any potential stability issues and adverse growth habits of the trees.
Consultation
Residents of Peaslake Street were initially advised of the proposal to remove the four London Plane trees in the street. A consulting arborist has been consulted who has provided advice on the ongoing management of these four trees.
The residents have since been advised that removal of the trees has been put on hold pending the outcome of this report to Council.
Comment
In view of the arborist’s recommendations, it is recommended to not remove the four London Plane trees which were initially proposed to be removed and implement the tree management practices. In addition to address the original complainant’s concerns, the City will continue to monitor the condition of the infrastructure in Peaslake Street and undertake necessary maintenance works as required.
In line with the current annual tree planting program aimed at increasing the number of residential street trees within the City, Administration will conduct further consultation with the residents of Peaslake Street to identify potential infill planting opportunities along the residential verges to ensure that the existing tree canopy is increased.
A review of the tree removal process has been undertaken, and administration has developed a more robust process for all future street tree removals. This process adheres to the Draft Street Tree Policy with its main objectives being:
· Provide guidance for the care, control, management, protection and preservation of City trees;
· To increase the City’s canopy cover;
· To enhance the amenity of the City’s streetscapes and reserves through planting of new trees: and
· To define the circumstances under which the City’s trees may be removed or pruned.
The purpose of the Policy is to provide a framework for the development of high quality streetscapes that require minimal resource input, thereby increasing environmental values. The Policy will also assist the City of Wanneroo in moving toward a greener, more liveable City by increasing tree numbers and ultimately canopy coverage across the City.
The Draft Street Tree Policy also considers requests from residents for the removal of street trees; these shall be in writing and will be considered on their merits by the City on the following criteria:
· Safety, health and conditions of the trees;
· Reasons highlighted by the residents;
· Value of the tree within the streetscape/landscape;
· Potential for significant nuisance actions in the street;
· History of requests and associated actions in the street.
The City will deal with street tree removal requests based on the above criteria. Where an entire street tree replacement program is implemented, staged removal of existing trees shall be the preferred option - refer to Attachment 3 for the Draft Street Tree Policy.
Additionally administration has developed a tree management removal document to be completed for all tree removals - refer to Attachment 4. A process map has also been developed for all tree removals, the procedure can then be better managed with administration conducting regular reviews of its processes – refer to Attachment 5.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.2 Enhanced Environment
3.2.3 Optimize retention of significant vegetation and habitat”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The Draft Street Tree Policy addresses the care and management of all City owned trees including requests for tree removal and retention.
Financial Implications
Costs for the arborist report and remedial pruning works are accommodated within the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the petition PT01-05/15 objecting to the removal of four Platanus acerifolia (London Plane) trees, from the verge of Peaslake Street, Butler;
2. DOES NOT APPROVE the removal of four Platanus acerifolia (London Plane) trees in Peaslake Street, Butler; and
3. AUTHORISES the Director Assets to advise the petition organisers of the outcomes of this report.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Peaslake Street Butler, Tree Images |
17/216735 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Peaslake Street Butler Aerial Image |
17/216732 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Draft Street Tree Policy |
17/247851 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Updated Tree Management Document |
17/254548 |
|
|
5⇩. |
TREE REMOVAL REQUEST PROCESS |
17/254719 |
|
Community & Place
CP01-08/17 Speedway Motorcycle Club of WA - Community Sporting and Recreation Facilities Fund, Small Grant Application
File Ref: 30193 – 17/236295
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider submissions to the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries for the 2017 small grants round of the Community Sport and Recreation Facilities Fund (CSRFF).
Background
Each year the State Government through the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (DLGSC) (formerly Department of Sport and Recreation) makes funding available to community/sporting groups and Local Governments to assist in the development of fixed sport and recreation infrastructure. The aim of Community Sporting and Recreation Facilities Fund (CSRFF) is to increase participation in sport and recreation through an emphasis on well-planned and well-utilised facilities.
A total of $12million is made available in three categories, which are based on the size and complexity of the proposed projects:
· Small Grants: Projects up to $200,000 can apply for a third of the cost and must be claimed in the same financial year of approval. There are two rounds each year in February and July. For projects with a grant request below $2,500 it is expected that the applicant should be able to fully fund these.
· Annual Grants: Projects $200,001 - $500,000 can apply for one third i.e. $66,667 - $166,666 and must be claimed in the financial year following the date of approval.
· Forward Planning Grants: Projects over $500,001 can apply for one third i.e. $166,667 - $2,000,000 and have three financial years to complete.
Contributions made through CSRFF must be matched by the applicant's own contribution (can include cash, donated materials and volunteer labour) with any balance of the funds being provided by an alternate funding source. This may be provided by the applicant, alternative grants, or by the Local Government. The Local Government is not required to contribute to any external CSRFF grant application.
All applications from within the City of Wanneroo are required to be submitted to the City for assessment and prioritisation - including those being submitted by the City itself. Applications are required to be endorsed by Council prior to their submission to DLGSC.
The 2017 CSRFF Small Grants funding round opened 1 July 2017 for projects up to $200,000 to be acquitted by 15 June 2018. Approved applications are required to be submitted to DLGSC no later than 4pm Monday 31 August 2017 in order for DLGSC assessment to be completed in September.
Detail
The City has received one external CSRFF application, from the Speedway Motorcycle Club of WA (SMCWA) to install transportable first aid and toilet facilities.
SMCWA are located at the Pinjar Motorcycle Park on Pederick Road in Neerabup. The site is Crown land, vested with the City of Wanneroo. The SMCWA’s current lease is until 2023.
Since the mid 1970’s the site has been utilised as a motorcycling racing venue. In 2006 a junior circuit was added and in 2015 a larger senior track was added. The club has been working to develop the larger track to allow senior national and international championship events, which are currently not provided for in WA.
The installation of first aid and toilet facilities along with the recently completed safety upgrades are required for SMCWA to obtain a track licence from the governing body, Motorcycling WA.
A breakdown of project costs and funding sources is as per the tables below.
|
Project Breakdown |
Amount ex GST |
|
Water bore and tanks |
$20,295 |
|
Toilet block |
$23,100 |
|
First aid block |
$13,100 |
|
Electrician |
$28,000 |
|
Donated Materials |
$28,165 |
|
Volunteer Labour |
$14,082 |
|
Total |
$126,742 |
|
Funding Sources |
Amount ex GST |
|
Local government |
$0 |
|
Applicant cash |
$42,248 |
|
Volunteer labour |
$14,082 |
|
Donated materials |
$28,165 |
|
CSRFF requested |
$42,247 |
|
Total |
$126,742 |
The project was assessed using the following philosophy and exclusion criteria established as a part of the CSRFF Review Process:
Philosophy
· Meets a clearly demonstrated need within the community;
· Support the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan;
· Provide maximum benefit and value for money for the community by providing multipurpose facilities and allow for general community uses (i.e. other community-based activities);
· Financially viable, with the applicant able to demonstrate the ability to meet the financial commitment;
· Increases participation;
· Include a clear management plan; and/or
· Facility provision to meet all relevant Australian Standards.
The project is considered to be in keeping with the City’s philosophy and does not contravene the exclusion criteria set out in the CSRFF guidelines. The project has been designated the assessment level of “satisfactory” in relation to the CSRFF Assessment Principles and has been rated as “well planned and needed by the applicant”. The CSRFF Review Panel recommends that the application be forwarded to DLGSC.
On this basis this report recommends that the CSRFF grant application of $42,247 be submitted on behalf of the SMCWA.
Consultation
Administration has previously, and continues to, consult directly with representatives from the SMCWA.
Comment
The SMCWA has been the successful recipient of a previous CSRFF Annual Grant. In 2015/16 they received $76,356 to construct a perimeter track safety fence. This project was undertaken and recently acquitted in line with all CSRFF requirements.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As the project is proposed to be funded by CSRFF and SMCWA there is no financial implication for the City. Should the CSRFF application not be successful the club has indicated that it will still carry out the works and fund the full amount from club reserves.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council SUBMITS the Speedway Motorcycle Club of WA’s CSRFF application to install transportable first aid and toilet facilities to the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries for the 2017 Small Grants Funding Round with the following assessment, project rating and prioritisation:
|
Project |
Assessment |
Project Rating |
Priority |
|
Install transportable first aid and toilet facilities |
Satisfactory |
Well planned and needed by the applicant |
1 |
Communication, Marketing and Events
CP02-08/17 Proposed Sponsorship Agreement for the Wanneroo Show - City of Wanneroo and the Wanneroo Agricultural Society (Inc.)
File Ref: 8380V02 – 17/244813
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider entering into a new five year Sponsorship Agreement between the City of Wanneroo (City) and the Wanneroo Agricultural Society (Inc.) (WAS) for the annual Wanneroo Agricultural Show.
Background
The Wanneroo Showgrounds (the Showgrounds) is located on Crown Reserve 12990, known as Lot 501 on Deposited Plan 55751 being the whole of the land comprised in Qualified Certificate of Crown Land Title Volume LR3147 Folio 366.
The Showgrounds provide a significant resource for active and passive leisure opportunities within the Wanneroo area, as reflected in its "Recreation" vesting under the current Management Order (registered at Landgate as dealing K285714).
The Management Order authorises the leasing or licensing of the Showgrounds for periods of up to 21 years, and in this respect portions of the Showgrounds are leased to:
· The WAS: The building known as the "Agricultural Poultry Shed"; and
· Wanneroo Amateur Football Club, Wanneroo Cricket Club Inc, Wanneroo Junior Football Club Inc, Wanneroo Junior Cricket Club: The clubroom and change rooms building.
Portions of the Showgrounds are also regularly hired by community and sporting groups under hire agreements administered by the Community and Place Directorate.
The Wanneroo Show (the Show) is an annual event that takes place at the Showgrounds that showcases agricultural, horticultural and other associated industries within the Wanneroo area.
During the period since the first annual Show was held in 1909, the WAS and the City have had informal arrangements in place to support the Show, extending to aspects such as regulatory compliance, waste collection and grounds maintenance.
In May 2015 Council approved a Sponsorship Agreement with the WAS to the value of approximately $30,000 per year for a period of three years, meaning that this year’s Wanneroo Show will be the last covered under this arrangement.
Detail
The terms of the proposed new five year Sponsorship Agreement between the WAS and the City, are similar in nature to the existing Agreement and include:
City’s Contribution
|
Waste Management Services (including litter collection and the delivery, servicing and collection of waste bins and recycling carts) |
$15,500 |
|
Cleaning Services (including toilet cleaning and maintenance) |
$4,200 |
|
Health Services Approvals (including inspection of food traders and temporary structures prior to the Show and as required during the Show) |
$2,800 |
|
Advertising and Graphic Support (marketing the Show including online and in displays at City Libraries) |
$5,500 |
|
Provision of a driver and flat tray truck for up to 6 hours on both Show days and two eight-seater community buses for patron transport |
$4,000 |
|
Contribution towards show entertainment and community marquee |
$2,000 |
WAS Contribution
|
Acknowledgement that the City is a major sponsor of the Show on all advertising including electronic publications |
|
Ground allocation for a City marquee, providing the City has an interactive display
|
|
Ticket provision for the Show to staff and Elected Members as required
|
|
VIP invitation to the CEO and Mayor to include parking
|
Consultation
The proposed new Sponsorship Agreement has been developed in consultation with the Wanneroo Agricultural Society.
Comment
The Sponsorship Agreement has been developed to streamline the Show process, improve communication between the parties and specify each party’s respective responsibilities.
The Sponsorship Agreement does not fetter either party's legal obligations, nor crystallise a party's contribution to the Show (which may vary due to future considerations including legislative and budgetary requirements, and operational capacities).
Both parties have met their obligations under the existing Agreement with the City gaining considerable benefit from being able to promote a broad range of its services through staff participation in displays and presentations in the dedicated marquee. Last year’s Show presented an opportunity to promote, and engage patrons with, the Connect Wanneroo campaign.
Notwithstanding that the Chief Executive Officer is permitted under delegation 10.5 to approve the proposed new Sponsorship Agreement, the proposal is submitted to Council for approval in recognition of the longstanding importance of the Show to the Wanneroo community.
Statutory Compliance
The Agreement has been drafted in accordance with the City’s Sponsorship Policy.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.2 Engage, include and involve community”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The proposed Agreement conforms with the City’s Sponsorship Policy.
Financial Implications
The City will make a financial contribution to the 2018 Wanneroo Show in accordance with the “City’s Contribution” as detailed in the “Background” section of this report and on an annual basis thereafter for a period of five years. The total contribution will be $34,000 for 2018/19 and is subject to determination as part of the City’s annual budgeting process.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council AGREES in principle to the terms of a five year Sponsorship Agreement commencing in 2018 with the Wanneroo Agricultural Society (Inc.) for the annual Wanneroo Show.
Place Strengthening
File Ref: 6382 – 17/208209
Responsible Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
Approval is being sought to extend the current City of Wanneroo Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) 2015-2017 by six months, to 30 June 2018.
Background
The current City RAP 2015 - 2017 is due to expire on 31 December 2017 (Attachment 1).
The purpose of the extension is to enable more actions within the current RAP to be completed prior to development of a new plan, and to align with review and development of several other strategic documents over the next two years. The revised timeline would also reduce the impact experienced due to recent staff changes associated with delivery of the plan.
The extension would change the current RAP delivery to 30 June 2018, rather than the current timeline of 31 December 2017. As Council endorsed the previous RAP, there is a requirement to seek Council approval for a revised timeline.
Detail
Of the 27 Actions in the RAP, 23 are partially completed and ongoing (reported annually), three have been fully completed and one is on hold due to being linked to another action. The proposed six month extension of the RAP would ensure the partially completed Actions, in particular RAP Action 15 have adequate time to be completed.
RAP Action 15 is to ‘Produce and display signs in location of cultural significance that outline Noongar history and culture in the area’.
Consultation
Administration has consulted with the City’s RAP Working Group and Reconciliation Australia who both support the proposed extension.
Reconciliation Australia has advised that the City of Wanneroo should continue to implement outstanding deliverables of the current RAP until 30 June 2018, without amending the existing RAP. The RAP Working Group is in agreement with an extension to the current RAP in order to execute the 27 Actions, and then begin evaluation and development of a new RAP.
Elected Members were provided a Briefing Note on 25 July 2017 requesting feedback on the proposed extension. One Elected Member supported this approach, while one requested further information that was subsequently provided. No other responses from Elected Members were received.
Comment
Providing a six month extension for delivery of the City’s RAP will enable Administration and the RAP Working Group further opportunity to complete existing actions, and to align the engagement and plan development processes for other strategic documents over the next two years.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST – S20 Strategic Community Plan |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO – 001 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Expenditure related to delivery of RAP actions has been incorporated into the 2017/18 City budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES a six month extension of the City of Wanneroo Reconciliation Action Plan 2015 – 2017, with a revised end date of 30 June 2018.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Reconciliation Action Plan Booklet 2015-2017 |
17/249744 |
|
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 25973 – 17/233519
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement (Estimate) for the period ended 30 June 2017.
Background
In accordance with Local Government Regulations, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
1. Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. For the 2016/17 financial year the statement of financial activity will be presented by nature and type.
2. Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2016/17 financial year 10% and a value greater than $10,000 will be used for the reporting of variances.
Detail
Summary
OVERALL SUMMARY OF CURRENT MONTH FINANCIAL FIGURES
Result from Operations
Capital Program
OVERALL COMMENTS ON YEAR-TO-DATE (YTD) FIGURES
Result from Operations
Capital Program Progress
Investment Portfolio Performance
DETAILED ANALYSIS OF STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (ATTACHMENT 1)
Comments relating to the Statement of Comprehensive Income are provided under the following two sections:
a) Current month comparison of actuals to budgets, and
b) Year to date and end of year comparison of actuals to budgets.
a) Current Month Comparison of Actuals to Budgets
The below table highlights the operating performance for the current month and identifies variances of actual to budget for each category of Revenue & Expense.
Total Comprehensive Income
The month of June produced a favourable variance of $14.3m reflecting receipt of an unbudgeted grant from Main Roads of $23.0m for the duelling of Marmion Avenue. However this favourable variance was reduced by Employee expense, due in part to an accrual error in Salaries and in part due to the reallocation of Contract Labour expenses which were previously charged to Materials and Contracts. This change is to improve overall transparency of total staff costs.
Materials and Contracts also produced an unfavourable variance due to Valuer General Assessment services. This cost was budgeted to be incurred throughout the year but the service was not undertaken until June. Parks Maintenance Consulting expense was higher due to environmental studies.
Contributed physical assets were below expectation and as a result an unfavourable variance has arisen. This continues to reflect lower development activity given market conditions. Town Planning Schemes also produced an unfavourable result due to the charging of additional Administration costs and a payment to the Western Australian Planning Commission for reimbursement of land as part of the Gnangara realignment.
Operating Revenues
The month of June produced a positive variance for Total Operating Revenue of $144k. The main contributors were pre-paid Rates which in error was not taken to the Balance Sheet as a liability, and an unbudgeted grant received from the Department of Transport. These were partially offset by lower Fees and Charges from Health Assessment Services which was budgeted for June but received in prior periods.
Operating Expenses
The unfavourable variance for June relates to higher Employee costs as a result of an accrual error identified and corrected as part of the year-end process, and the reallocation of Contract Labour costs from Materials and Contracts designed to improve overall transparency of staff costs. These accounts previously included Contract Labour expenses which relate to the employment of staff through approved agencies as well as salary/wage expense reimbursements from capital works to operating activities. It is noted that there was a favourable variance observed within Town Planning Scheme recoveries due to adjustments from under recoveries related to employee costs in prior years being recognised in June.
Materials and Contracts also resulted in an unfavourable variance. Within Contract Expenses, Valuer General GRV assessments were predominately undertaken in June however budgets recognised this as a monthly cost throughout the year. In addition Consulting Fees proved unfavourable given environmental studies charged to Parks Maintenance as well as conducting transport modelling analysis through special projects which were incurred in June however budgeted throughout the year.
Other Revenue & Expenses
A favourable variance of $17.0m was observed due to a Main Roads grant relating to duelling works to be on Marmion Avenue. This was partially offset by unfavourable variances in Contributed Physical Assets being an impact of adverse property conditions. In addition Town Planning Schemes also produced an unfavourable variance due to the review of Administration costs and a payment to the Western Australian Planning Commission for reimbursement of land as part of the Gnangara realignment.
b) Year to Date and End of Year Comparison of Actuals to Budgets
Details for the variances are outlined below.
Operating Revenues
Other Revenue (Actual $1.0m, Revised Budget $0.8m)
The positive year to date result primarily relates to receipt received in May regarding reimbursement for a legal matter. Additionally in June there was recognition of unbudgeted income relating to a pathway project with the City of Joondalup.
Operating Expenses
Materials and Contracts (Actual $49.0m, Revised Budget $53.6m)
Within Contract expenses we observed a positive variance of $1.5m which relates to various maintenance and conservation savings. These include improved turf maintenance practices as well as favourable weather conditions resulting in reduced reactive maintenance to sporting fields.
There was a provision for open public space maintenance expenses relating to assets handed to the City from developers. Due to market conditions development has reduced and consequently these assets have been postponed to be handed over leaving reductions in maintenance expenditure.
Weed spraying programs were started in June however due to rain delays a large portion of those works are still being conducted after June.
Building Maintenance expenditure was reduced due to savings in reactive costs through cheaper than expected quotations as well as some work being delayed through to next financial year.
Insurance Expenses (Actual $1.4 Revised Budget $1.6m)
The positive variance relates to lower than expected premiums on Public Liability Insurance and Professional Indemnity Insurance.
Other Revenue & Expenses
Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions (Actual $37.0m, Revised Budget $15.7m)
The favourable variance is attributed to a Main Roads grant received in June for $23.0m which was not budgeted for.
Contributed Physical Assets (Actual $46.7m, Revised Budget $60.0m)
The year to June recognised a parcel of developer contributed assets totalling $46.7m however this was below budget due to suppressed market conditions.
Profit / Loss on Asset Disposals (Actual $1.3m, Revised Budget $1.8m)
The unfavourable variance is mainly a result of lower contributions from Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) due to the suppressed property market. As the timing of asset disposals cannot be reliably estimated results to budgets can be subject to variations.
Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Revenues (Actual $14.7m, Revised Budget $21.9m)
The variance is attributed to lower sales in Cell 1 (-$1.1m), Cell 4 (-$3.8m), and Cell 9 (-$2.0m) all reflecting current market conditions.
Cell 1 has now been confirmed that the developer is only developing half of the site (commercial portion) and the remainder won’t be developed until subsequent financial years. Therefore, nil income is now expected to be realised in the 2016/17 financial year.
Cell 4 income is now anticipated within 2017/18 due to a delay in the subdivision clearance. In this regard, subdivisional works were not completed by the developer before 30 June 2017, and therefore the income will not be received in the 2016/17 financial year.
Within Cell 9 a deed of agreement has been executed with the landowner of Lot 1981 Gnangara Road Lansdale, which defers the contribution of $1,255,995 for up to 12 months. Income will now be received in 2017/18. Lot 152 Lansdale Road incurred delays in finalisation of its subdivisional works and therefore will now occur within 2017/18.
Town Planning Scheme Expenses (Actual $7.2m, Revised Budget $18.4m)
The main contributor for the positive variance is a result of Lot 22 East Road POS development. The subdivisional clearance was delayed due to incomplete subdivision works preventing the vesting of POS in the Crown. Therefore the expense will be receipted in 2017/18. Estimated costs are $7.0m.
The positive YTD variance is also contributed by Cell 5 and 8 land acquisitions which are awaiting pending decisions from the Supreme Court. The matter has been heard but the City is awaiting the decision to be handed down. Costs are estimated at $3.6m.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (Attachment 2)
Net Current Assets
When compared to the opening position Net Current Assets have increased by $35.3m which largely reflects the timing of Rates receipts for 2016/17 as well as an additional grant being received late in the financial year.
Current Receivables are largely related to collectable Rates income ($11.6m). Remaining current receivables relates to Emergency Services Levy collections ($1.1m) and sundry debtor accounts.
Non-Current Assets
Non-Current receivables largely relate to Deferred Pensioner Rebates; being funds that cannot be collected until the Pensioner ceases to reside at the rateable property.
Year to date Non-Current Assets have increased by $72.5m from 2015/16 which is attributed mainly to the recognition of contributed physical assets from developers as well as capital works in progress.
The year to date Work in Progress balance is largely attributed to Pathways, Purchase & Upgrade of Residential Land, Waste Domestic Plant and various Capital Infrastructure Projects.
Non-Current Liabilities
Year to date Non-Current Liabilities have increased by $5.8m which is mostly attributed to the new loan facility for the Yanchep DCP. The existing loan with the Western Australia Treasury Corporation remains unchanged and when combined with the new loan make up 98% of total Non-Current Liabilities.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
The table below present’s data on relevant financial ratios, comparing the minimum standard expected as per the Department of Local Government & Communities status at the beginning of the financial year, and year to date figures. An explanation of the purpose of each ratio is also provided together with commentary where a ratio does not meet the minimum standard (highlighted in Red). A green highlight is used where the minimum standard is met or exceeded.
CAPITAL PROGRAM
The current status of the Capital Program is summarised below by Sub-Program category.
$11.11m of works were progressed during the calendar month of June. Significant capital works undertaken for the month included:
• $1.2m Civic Centre extension
• $1.2m Yanchep Active Open Space - Oval Ground Works (inclusive of practical
completion of the first contributed oval)
• $1.0m Fleet management
• $1.0m Multiple roads in the Roads sub-program
• $942k Yanchep District Playing Fields Yanchep
• $823k Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club
• $656k Marmion Avenue (Lukin Dr to Butler Blvd)
• $438k Old Yanchep Road (Trandos Road to Wattle Avenue)
• $379k Irrigation infrastructure replacement
• $361k Riverlinks Park, Clarkson
• $339k Yanchep District Sports Amenities Building
• $218k Quinns Surf Life Saving Club
For 2016/17 84% of the Capital Works Program was completed which equates to $67.7m. The amount carried forward is $12.8m of works that will be progressed and it is anticipated that 60% will be expended in the first quarter of the 2017/18 financial year.
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information above, key capital projects are selected to be specifically reported on, which are itemised in the Top Capital Projects attachment to this report (Attachment 3).
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO (Attachment 4)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (and per the City’s Investment Policy), the City only invests in the following highly secured investments in Australian currency:
1. Deposits with authorised deposit taking institutions and the Western Australian Treasury Corporation for a term not exceeding 12 months;
2. Bonds that are guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government or a State or Territory for a term not exceeding three years.
As at the current month end, the City holds an investment portfolio (cash & cash equivalents) of $355.6m (Face Value), equating to $360.3m inclusive of accrued interest. The City’s year to date investment portfolio return has exceeded the Bank Bill index benchmark by 0.94% pa (2.76% pa vs. 1.82% pa), however it is noted that Interest Earnings were budgeted at a 3.00% yield.
The current investment portfolio does not hold an investment in National Australia Bank and Suncorp as more competitive rates were attained in other institutions.
RATE SETTING STATEMENT (Attachment 5)
The Rate Setting Statement represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the Surplus/(Deficit) based on the Revenues (excluding Rates), Expenses, Capital Works and Funding Movements, resulting in the Rating Income required. It is noted that the closing Surplus/(Deficit) will balance to the reconciliation of Net Current Assets Surplus/(Deficit) Carried Forward (detailed below).
Consultation
This document has been prepared in consultation with Responsible Officers for review and analysis.
Comment
The budget figures within this report incorporate approved budget amendments.
As per item 2 in Background, comments on material variances are provided below.
In reference to tables provided in the report, the following colours have been used to categorise three levels of variance:
· Green >+10%,
· Orange <+/-10%, and
· Red >-10%.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
· Accounting Policy
· Strategic Budget Policy
· Investment Policy
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1 – 5
Voting Requirement
Simple Majority
That Council RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to YTD Budget for the period ended 30 June 2017, consisting of:
1. 2016/17 Annual Adopted and Revised Budget;
2. June 2017 YTD Revised Budgets;
3. June 2017 YTD Actuals;
4. June 2017 Statement of Financial Position and Net Current Assets; and
5. June 2017 YTD Material Financial Variance Notes.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
June 17 Statement of Comprehensive Income by Nature and Type |
17/237437 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
June 17 Statement of Financial Position |
17/237456 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Top Projects 2016-17 - June 2017 - 20170720 - Query on PR-4032 - PMO17084 Yanchep Active Open Space Oval Groundworks |
16/151914[v16] |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
June 17 Rate Setting Statement |
17/237458 |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
June 17 Investments Report |
17/237463 |
Minuted |
Transactional Finance
File Ref: 1859 – 17/251185
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid during the month of July 2017, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in July 2017:
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – July 2017 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme Manual Journal RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
109940 - 110164 2938 - 2973 |
$325,791.23 $18,587,858.58 $18,913,649.81
($7,569.50) ($400.00) ($1,025,765.40) $17,879,914.91 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – July 2017 Municipal Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$17,879,914.91 $31,453.36 $3,580,564.94 $21,491,933.21 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – July 2017 Cell 7 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$400.00 $400.00 |
At the close of July 2017 outstanding creditors amounted to $740,339.33.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payment (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of July 2017 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Warrant of Payments Information Only |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Transactional Finance Manager |
Accept |
“There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of July 2017, as summarised below:-
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – July 2017 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme Manual Journal RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
109940 - 110164 2938 - 2973 |
$325,791.23 $18,587,858.58 $18,913,649.81
($7,569.50) ($400.00) ($1,025,765.40) $17,879,914.91 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – July 2017 Municipal Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$17,879,914.91 $31,453.36 $3,580,564.94 $21,491,933.21 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – July 2017 Cell 7 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$400.00 $400.00 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS JULY 2017 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00109940 |
04/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$179.69 |
|
00109941 |
04/07/2017 |
Lorenzo Cremasco |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109942 |
04/07/2017 |
Ay Fong Tan |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109943 |
04/07/2017 |
Lily Tran |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109944 |
04/07/2017 |
Tracey Hinton |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109945 |
04/07/2017 |
Kerry-Lee Riley |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109946 |
04/07/2017 |
Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh Incorporated |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109947 |
04/07/2017 |
Chloe Aubrey |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109948 |
04/07/2017 |
Mitesh Madhapariya |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109949 |
04/07/2017 |
Foodbank of WA Incorporated |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109950 |
04/07/2017 |
Monika Kotevski |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109951 |
04/07/2017 |
Navrose Sandhu |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109952 |
04/07/2017 |
CWA - Wanneroo Branch |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109953 |
04/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$688.25 |
|
00109954 |
04/07/2017 |
BGC Residential |
$4,019.98 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Duplicate Payment |
|
|
00109955 |
04/07/2017 |
Navrose Sandhu |
$156.80 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00109956 |
04/07/2017 |
J & K Donovan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00109957 |
04/07/2017 |
Thomas C Ormsby |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00109958 |
04/07/2017 |
Department of Environment Regulation |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Overpayment Of Property Lease Fee |
|
|
00109959 |
04/07/2017 |
J Bullingham & Samantha Ottey |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00109960 |
04/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$652.50 |
|
00109961 |
04/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00109962 |
04/07/2017 |
One Church Incorporated |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Wanneroo Christmas Lunch 25.12.2017 - Margaret Cockman Pavilion Wanneroo Showgrounds |
|
|
00109963 |
04/07/2017 |
The Salvation Army |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Community Christmas Carols Event 08.12.2017 - Addison Park Merriwa |
|
|
00109964 |
04/07/2017 |
Vivesco |
$499.80 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00109965 |
04/07/2017 |
Courtney Wood |
$21.25 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Incorrectly Charged Full Rate |
|
|
00109966 |
04/07/2017 |
Dreamstart Homes |
$544.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Fee - Cancelled |
|
|
00109967 |
04/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$35.36 |
|
00109968 |
04/07/2017 |
Land Surveys No Problems Just Solutions |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Additional Subdivision Clearance - Fees Only Payable For 39 Lots |
|
|
00109969 |
04/07/2017 |
Basement Dance Works |
$305.63 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00109970 |
04/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00109971 |
04/07/2017 |
Western Force WA Schoolboys |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 2 X Members - Western Force Schoolboys Rugby National Championships Sydney 02 - 08.07.2017 |
|
|
00109972 |
04/07/2017 |
Jo-Anne Pendreigh |
$5.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Overcharged |
|
|
00109973 |
04/07/2017 |
Homebuyers Centre Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00109974 |
04/07/2017 |
Katie Carter |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00109975 |
04/07/2017 |
Darren Ma |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00109976 |
04/07/2017 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$45.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00109977 |
04/07/2017 |
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash |
$166.90 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00109978 |
04/07/2017 |
Water Corporation |
$3,007.93 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
00109979 |
04/07/2017 |
Telstra |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00109980 |
04/07/2017 |
Morley Bulldogs Junior Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00109981 |
04/07/2017 |
Mary Mackillop Netball Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00109982 |
04/07/2017 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Room Two Petty Cash |
$40.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00109983 |
04/07/2017 |
Mrs Anne Murgatroyd |
$49.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - CPR Course - Aquamotion |
|
|
00109984 |
07/07/2017 |
Building & Construction Industry |
$66,395.60 |
|
|
|
Collection Levy Payments 01 - 30.06.2017 - Finance |
|
|
00109985 |
11/07/2017 |
Lara Mittic |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Cat Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00109986 |
11/07/2017 |
Kylie Smith |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00109987 |
11/07/2017 |
Kirk Pridham |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109988 |
11/07/2017 |
Sandy Di Bartolomeo |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109989 |
11/07/2017 |
Thanh Le |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109990 |
11/07/2017 |
Ahmed Aboukotma |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109991 |
11/07/2017 |
Luciel Kruger |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109992 |
11/07/2017 |
Marie Gail Miller |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109993 |
11/07/2017 |
Chantelle Ingram |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109994 |
11/07/2017 |
Jessica Francis |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109995 |
11/07/2017 |
Arleen Lafuente |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109996 |
11/07/2017 |
Gemma Warren |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109997 |
11/07/2017 |
Lorraine Lekias |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109998 |
11/07/2017 |
Muhammad Afzal |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00109999 |
11/07/2017 |
Rebecca Gianfagna |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110000 |
11/07/2017 |
Krylov Nugroho |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110001 |
11/07/2017 |
Juanita Pitout |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110002 |
11/07/2017 |
Rachel Styles |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110003 |
11/07/2017 |
Stockland Development Pty Ltd |
$11,173.80 |
|
|
|
Finalisation Of Works - POS 7 - Stage 20 Development - Town Planning East Wanneroo Cell 9 |
|
|
00110004 |
11/07/2017 |
Homebuyers Centre Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110005 |
11/07/2017 |
Ambassador Construction & Maintenance |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110006 |
11/07/2017 |
Timothy Landrigan |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110007 |
11/07/2017 |
Joanne Noble |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110008 |
11/07/2017 |
Zumba Dance Fitness with Sacha |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Payment Refund - Bookings Cancelled |
|
|
00110009 |
11/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110010 |
11/07/2017 |
NRL WA |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 3 X Members - WA U16 Affiliates State Rugby League Championships Adelaide 22 - 25.06.2017 |
|
|
00110011 |
11/07/2017 |
Dance Force the Studio |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 3 X Members - Dance Life Unite Nationals Sydney 23.09.2017 |
|
|
00110012 |
11/07/2017 |
School Sport Western Australia Incorporated |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 3 X Members - 12s Rugby League National Championships Melbourne 05 - 13.08.2017 |
|
|
00110013 |
11/07/2017 |
Two Rocks Yanchep Emergency Scouts |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 8 Members - Campwest 17 Scout Jamboree Manjedahl WA 30.09.2017 - 06.10.2017 |
|
|
00110014 |
11/07/2017 |
Little Athletics WA |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 3 X Members - Little Athletics International Championships Gambang Malaysia 08 - 09.07.2017 |
|
|
00110015 |
11/07/2017 |
Blueprint Homes (WA) Pty Ltd |
$737.40 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Withdrawn |
|
|
00110016 |
11/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$88.78 |
|
00110017 |
11/07/2017 |
Karin Villemin |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Wheelchair Basketball Challenge - Program Cancelled |
|
|
00110018 |
11/07/2017 |
Mr Carlton Hewett |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Overpayment Of HACC Account - Finance |
|
|
00110019 |
11/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$664.50 |
|
00110020 |
11/07/2017 |
Craig Knox |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110021 |
11/07/2017 |
Richard Antal |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Program Cancelled - Urban Deck Art & Free Skate |
|
|
00110022 |
11/07/2017 |
Jutta Wilkinson |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Program Cancelled - Urban Deck Art & Free Skate |
|
|
00110023 |
11/07/2017 |
Tenille Vitalich |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110024 |
11/07/2017 |
Aquatic Leisure Technologies Trading As Aqua Technic Pools |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110025 |
11/07/2017 |
S Geddes |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund - Street & Verge |
|
|
00110026 |
11/07/2017 |
City of Wanneroo |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Cash Float - Girrawheen Library - Envisionware System |
|
|
00110027 |
11/07/2017 |
Mr Stephen Freeborn |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
00110028 |
11/07/2017 |
Water Corporation |
$14,253.36 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
00110029 |
11/07/2017 |
Telstra |
$159.63 |
|
|
|
Mobile Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00110030 |
12/07/2017 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00110031 |
12/07/2017 |
Cr D Newton |
$2,477.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00110032 |
18/07/2017 |
Christian Power of Pentecost Church |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110033 |
18/07/2017 |
Lynette Bennett |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110034 |
18/07/2017 |
Goodwill Association WA Incorporated |
$840.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110035 |
18/07/2017 |
Lallaine Buque |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110036 |
18/07/2017 |
Leandri Van den Berg |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110037 |
18/07/2017 |
Stacie Connors |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110038 |
18/07/2017 |
Rebecca Welch |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110039 |
18/07/2017 |
Emma Bowman |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110040 |
18/07/2017 |
Candice Heintz |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110041 |
18/07/2017 |
Kristy Hussey |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110042 |
18/07/2017 |
Lorna Ramsay |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110043 |
18/07/2017 |
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110044 |
18/07/2017 |
Tayla Harrison |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110045 |
18/07/2017 |
Gemma Pritchard |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110046 |
18/07/2017 |
Karen Harvey |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110047 |
18/07/2017 |
Ashley Van Emden |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110048 |
18/07/2017 |
Hannah Dunnet |
$144.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110049 |
18/07/2017 |
David Alan Payne |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110050 |
18/07/2017 |
Jesse Hinksman & Christie Brown |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110051 |
18/07/2017 |
Caroline Rouse |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110052 |
18/07/2017 |
Geoffrey Thomas Whall |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Certificate Building Compliance - Cancelled |
|
|
00110053 |
18/07/2017 |
Filtrex Innovative Wastewater Solutions |
$118.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Septic Tank Permit Fee - No Permit To Use Issued |
|
|
00110054 |
18/07/2017 |
S Richards |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110055 |
18/07/2017 |
M Porter |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Infringement - Regulatory Services |
|
|
00110056 |
18/07/2017 |
Christian Power of Pentecost Church Incorporated |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00110057 |
18/07/2017 |
Wow Group (WA) Pty Ltd |
$306.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Amendment Fee - Not Required |
|
|
00110058 |
18/07/2017 |
R Krouzecky |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Building Advice Fee - Not Required |
|
|
00110059 |
18/07/2017 |
Shelda Bairstow |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
City Of Wanneroo Art Awards 2017 - Artworks Sold - Works On Paper |
|
|
00110060 |
18/07/2017 |
Emad Aliny |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110061 |
18/07/2017 |
Stevie Holmes |
$7.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Drum Making Workshop - Youth |
|
|
00110062 |
18/07/2017 |
Plunkett Homes Pty Ltd |
$79.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Overpayment Of Fees |
|
|
00110063 |
18/07/2017 |
Matthew Spurrier |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110064 |
18/07/2017 |
R Lawton |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00110065 |
18/07/2017 |
Garry & Lee Shennen |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110066 |
18/07/2017 |
Howling Wolves Wine |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Application For Section 40 Certificate - Not Required |
|
|
00110067 |
18/07/2017 |
Tara Cameron |
$23.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons For Term 2 2017 |
|
|
00110068 |
18/07/2017 |
Michelle Ferguson |
$79.50 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00110069 |
18/07/2017 |
Ventura Home Group Trading As Aussie Living Homes |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110070 |
18/07/2017 |
Drew Byrne |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110071 |
18/07/2017 |
Aquatic Leisure Technologies Trading As Buccaneer Pools |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110072 |
18/07/2017 |
Future Home Living Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110073 |
18/07/2017 |
Aquatic Leisure Technologies Trading As Aqua Technic Pools |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110074 |
18/07/2017 |
Benjamin J Russell |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110075 |
18/07/2017 |
Amassador Construction & Maintenance |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110076 |
18/07/2017 |
Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - National U15's Womens AFL Championships Perth 23 - 29.07.2017 |
|
|
00110077 |
18/07/2017 |
Perry Lakes Hawks Basketball Association |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - Australian Helloworld Under 14 Club Championships Dandenong 02 - 07.10.2017 |
|
|
00110078 |
18/07/2017 |
Kalari Taekwondo Australia Incorporated |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - The Borneo Cup International Taekwondo Championships In Sarawak-Kuching Malaysia 15 - 16.07.2017 |
|
|
00110079 |
18/07/2017 |
School Sport WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 2 X Members - 12s AFL National Championship Darwin 11 - 19.08.2017 |
|
|
00110080 |
18/07/2017 |
Maccabi WA Incorporated |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - The Maccabiah Games In Israel 06.07.2017 |
|
|
00110081 |
18/07/2017 |
Indoor Sports WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - 2017 Super Nationals Melbourne 27.07.2017 |
|
|
00110082 |
18/07/2017 |
YMCA WA |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - The YMCA Youth Parliament 2017 Perth 02 - 07.07.2017 |
|
|
00110083 |
18/07/2017 |
Alkimos Tigers JRLC |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - Australia National Rugby League Championships In Melbourne 05 - 13.08.2017 |
|
|
00110084 |
18/07/2017 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$50.95 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00110085 |
18/07/2017 |
Water Corporation |
$6,233.04 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
00110086 |
18/07/2017 |
Telstra |
$33,827.69 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00110087 |
18/07/2017 |
Mr Simon Fracassini |
$49.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - CPR Training - Aquamotion |
|
|
00110088 |
25/07/2017 |
Jacqueline Mary Parry |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110089 |
25/07/2017 |
Jatin Jagtap |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110090 |
25/07/2017 |
Tamana Rahimi |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110091 |
25/07/2017 |
Dhaval Shah |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110092 |
25/07/2017 |
Dawn Pathak |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110093 |
25/07/2017 |
Kelly Giles |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110094 |
25/07/2017 |
Carers WA |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110095 |
25/07/2017 |
Carina Macmillan |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110096 |
25/07/2017 |
Tracey Rebeiro |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110097 |
25/07/2017 |
Sharyn Bradbury |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110098 |
25/07/2017 |
James Gunn |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110099 |
25/07/2017 |
Rajagopal Ganessan |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110100 |
25/07/2017 |
Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110101 |
25/07/2017 |
Mr Mark Nuu |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110102 |
25/07/2017 |
Chloe Drew |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110103 |
25/07/2017 |
Sarah Copeland |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110104 |
25/07/2017 |
Dwayne Dodd |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110105 |
25/07/2017 |
J & K De Senneville |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110106 |
25/07/2017 |
P & J Ford |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00110107 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$2,510.00 |
|
00110108 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$254.32 |
|
00110109 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$354.91 |
|
00110110 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$25,795.12 |
|
00110111 |
25/07/2017 |
Bokhtiar Ahmed |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110112 |
25/07/2017 |
Redzep Hasani |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00110113 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$800.00 |
|
00110114 |
25/07/2017 |
Bhavin Shah |
$53.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00110115 |
25/07/2017 |
Australian Outdoor Living |
$118.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Fee - Amended Plan Fee Not Required |
|
|
00110116 |
25/07/2017 |
Wanneroo/Joondalup Orchid Society |
$188.50 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00110117 |
25/07/2017 |
Georgina McNair |
$22.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Movies & Sizzlers - Youth |
|
|
00110118 |
25/07/2017 |
McMullen Nolan Group |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Subdivision Clearance - Overpayment |
|
|
00110119 |
25/07/2017 |
JCORP Pty Ltd Trading As Impressions |
$426.86 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Fee |
|
|
00110120 |
25/07/2017 |
Kingsway Football & Sporting Club Incorporated |
$916.05 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00110121 |
25/07/2017 |
The Garden Clubs of Australia Incorporated |
$130.00 |
|
|
|
Membership - Joining & Affiliation Fees - Community Links |
|
|
00110122 |
25/07/2017 |
Celebration Homes |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00110123 |
25/07/2017 |
Classic Home & Garage Innovations |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Planning Application - Not Required |
|
|
00110124 |
25/07/2017 |
Louise Good |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00110125 |
25/07/2017 |
Jenna Robertson |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swim Lessons - Aquamotion |
|
|
00110126 |
25/07/2017 |
Jamie Watson |
$42.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Paid Twice |
|
|
00110127 |
25/07/2017 |
Dawn Mills |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Surfing |
|
|
00110128 |
25/07/2017 |
Ice Synchro WA |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 X Member - Attend The World Synchronised Ice Skating Championships In Colorado Springs 07 - 08.04.2017 |
|
|
00110129 |
25/07/2017 |
Tracey Ewers |
$280.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Hairdressing Application - Cancellation Of Application |
|
|
00110130 |
25/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$371.12 |
|
00110131 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110132 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110133 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110134 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110135 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110136 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110137 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110138 |
25/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00110139 |
25/07/2017 |
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash |
$158.85 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00110140 |
25/07/2017 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$49.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00110141 |
25/07/2017 |
Water Corporation |
$11,972.55 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
00110142 |
25/07/2017 |
Telstra |
$14,950.79 |
|
|
|
Phone/Internet Charges For The City |
|
|
00110143 |
25/07/2017 |
Insurance Advisernet Australia Pty |
$984.50 |
|
|
|
Liability Insurance - 01.08.2017 - 01.08.2018 - Risk Management |
|
|
00110144 |
25/07/2017 |
Mrs Jodie Goodwin |
$255.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Austwim Renewal To Maintain Current Role - Aquamotion |
|
|
00110145 |
25/07/2017 |
Projects Petty Cash |
$160.70 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00110146 |
25/07/2017 |
Mrs Colleen Fryters |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Working With Children Check Renewal To Maintain Current Role - Aquamotion |
|
|
00110147 |
25/07/2017 |
Altronic Distributors |
$1,464.15 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00110148 |
25/07/2017 |
Canon Australia Pty Ltd |
$581.44 |
|
|
|
Service Scanner - IT |
|
|
00110149 |
25/07/2017 |
City of Whittlesea |
$22,000.00 |
|
|
|
NGAA Membership Contribution - Economic Development |
|
|
00110150 |
25/07/2017 |
Cooldrive Distribution |
$191.90 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00110151 |
25/07/2017 |
Coolican Civil Engineering Pty Ltd |
$1,727.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Concrete Communication Lids - Oligantha - Engineering |
|
|
00110152 |
25/07/2017 |
Golfbox Joondalup |
$309.60 |
|
|
|
Wheeled Travel Cover - Cultural Development |
|
|
00110153 |
25/07/2017 |
Greenhouse Education Pty Ltd |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Room Hire & Catering - 23.05.2017 - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
00110154 |
25/07/2017 |
Hardware Cafe Merriwa |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Catering For Grant Writing - Community Links |
|
|
00110155 |
25/07/2017 |
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore Joondalup |
$820.89 |
|
|
|
Panasonic Underwater Camera - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Coffee Machine, Microwave, Sandwich Press & Toaster - Waste |
|
|
00110156 |
25/07/2017 |
Japanese Truck & Bus Spares Pty Ltd |
$1,006.50 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00110157 |
25/07/2017 |
Jessica Hart |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Aboriginal Art Workshops X 3 - Girrawheen Senior High School - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
00110158 |
25/07/2017 |
Joondalup Autospark |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00110159 |
25/07/2017 |
Repco Auto Parts |
$2,671.68 |
|
|
|
Service Repair Rear Wheel Cylinders - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Worklamp - Stores |
|
|
00110160 |
25/07/2017 |
Sign A Rama |
$313.50 |
|
|
|
Retractable Banner - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
00110161 |
25/07/2017 |
Stephen McKee |
$3,600.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
00110162 |
25/07/2017 |
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$600.31 |
|
|
|
Subscriber Subscription - Newspapers For The City |
|
|
00110163 |
25/07/2017 |
Westrac |
$16.30 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00110164 |
25/07/2017 |
Yarn Strong Sista Pty Ltd |
$425.33 |
|
|
|
Puzzles And Aboriginal Music - Heritage & Museum Services |
|
|
|
|
Noongar Museum In A Box - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$325,791.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00002938 |
04/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002939 |
04/07/2017 |
Synergy |
$39,902.30 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002940 |
04/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Jan Byleveld |
$315.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Kalari Taekwondo Australia Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rocks Junior Cricket Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Bedford District Youth Club Incorporated |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ian Mullane |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Northern City Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Smart Martial Arts & Taekwondo |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Planners Association |
$65.00 |
|
|
|
Tickets - Freight, Logistics & Industrial Development - 1 X Attendee |
|
|
|
|
City Of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$1,576.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$507.45 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Department Of Transport |
$1,755.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Search Fees - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Mr Roy Bastick |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads Western Australia |
$20,980.05 |
|
|
|
40kph Electronic Sign - Ainsbury Parade - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Ms Michelle Brennand |
$693.00 |
|
|
|
Telephone Allowance - July 2016 - June 2017 - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$356.40 |
|
|
|
Thermal Mapping Imagery - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Riding For The Disabled Association |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Ashdale Netball Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Woodvale FC |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
18th WA Wanneroo Boys Brigade |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Warwick Greenwood Junior Football Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002941 |
04/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$8,460.42 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$36,061.91 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals |
$23,045.00 |
|
|
|
Performance Excellence Program - Corporate Strategy & Performance |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$2,330.35 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,107.05 |
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$16,989.04 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$219.00 |
|
|
|
Two Way Radios - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$201,324.48 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Nuford |
$109.80 |
|
|
|
New Mudflaps - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$260.06 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Boc Limited |
$57.19 |
|
|
|
Gas Bottles - Fleet & Safety Services |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Club |
$44,000.00 |
|
|
|
Beach Safety Services - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$20,507.55 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Manumalo Pty Ltd |
$106.00 |
|
|
|
Catering - Grant Writing Workshop - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$394.50 |
|
|
|
Resources For Community Skills Bank & Girrawheen Hub |
|
|
|
|
Goods For Yspeak - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$68,636.83 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002942 |
04/07/2017 |
Rates Refund |
$158,875.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002943 |
04/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Department Of The Environment And Energy |
$6,577.00 |
|
|
|
EPBC Referral Fee 2017/7983 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002944 |
04/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bistel Construction Pty Ltd |
$372,432.18 |
|
|
|
Contract Variation V01 - Structural Revision - Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Kelly Gardner |
$280.00 |
|
|
|
Performance - Emergency Services Dinner 23.06.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Solution 4 Building Pty Ltd |
$39,943.32 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Mary Lindsay Homestead Building - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002945 |
07/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$89,913.35 |
|
|
|
Lay Turf - Houghton Oval - Parks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002946 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$570,592.20 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002947 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clicksuper Pty Ltd |
$1,052,578.72 |
|
|
|
Superannuation Payments - Payroll |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002948 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$75.45 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$1,303.70 |
|
|
|
Counter Transaction Fees - Rating Service |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$268.10 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$819.72 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$576,772.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Austswim WA |
$255.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - R Grealy - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Building Commission |
$65,112.96 |
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payments 01.06.2017 - 30.06.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$2,100.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$5,989.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$782.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf |
$37,249.43 |
|
|
|
Commission Fees - Carramar Golf Course - June 2017 - Property |
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning |
$3,609.00 |
|
|
|
Application Fees Accepted - Planning Solutions DAP Application Number - DA2017/818 Value $4,000,000 (Excl GST) |
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd |
$35,936.11 |
|
|
|
Commission Fees - Marangaroo Golf Course - June 2017 - Property |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$539.75 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd |
$870.55 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$3,631.19 |
|
|
|
Mining Tenements Chargeable - Rates |
|
|
|
|
Valuation Of Land GRV/UV - Rates |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,080.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads Western Australia |
$79,661.41 |
|
|
|
Roadside Design Course - 5 X Attendees - July 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Works - Connolly Drive Stage 3 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$6,448.61 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Miss Briana Sorgiovanni |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement First Aid Course - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Mr Daniel Simms |
$1,488.01 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - CEO Air Fare Expenses Incurred To Attend EDAC & IEDC Conferences In Canada Between 04 - 09.09.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Mr David Nicholson |
$172.45 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Costs Associated With The World Business Forum Sydney |
|
|
|
|
Mr John Doran |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - 50% Mobile Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$15,136.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$335.74 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Aust WA Division Incorporated |
$2,120.00 |
|
|
|
2017 / 2018 UDIA Corporate Membership Subscription |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002949 |
12/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Super |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Superannuation Contribution From Allowance |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Payment From Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise |
$2,203.83 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lara Simpkins |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Samantha Jane Fenn |
$2,577.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$11,170.68 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002950 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$4,947.25 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate No 16 - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre - Architectural Consultancy - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002951 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$126,257.94 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$2,554.96 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$3,098.80 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$1,182.50 |
|
|
|
Removal Of Pump - Anchorage Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$17,158.10 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Southside |
$25,945.26 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$2,766.56 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$87.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$692.93 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$274,351.34 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Model Aircraft Services Pty Ltd |
$2,399.90 |
|
|
|
Purchase 1 X Drone - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$9,557.70 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Open Windows Software Pty Ltd |
$14,300.00 |
|
|
|
Open Windows Contracts Maintenance & Support 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2017 - It |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$16,115.69 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Staples Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,781.58 |
|
|
|
Stationery For The City |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$1,077.86 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Treasury Corpora |
$210,975.24 |
|
|
|
Guarantee Fee Due 24.07.2017 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$8,250.00 |
|
|
|
Review Of Procurement & Contract Management In May 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002952 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Armed for Life |
$2,640.00 |
|
|
|
Resilience Program Girrawheen Senior High School 2017 Part 2 - Advocacy And Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Construct360 Pty Ltd |
$24,447.50 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 6 Minor Modifications To Wanneroo Civic Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd |
$56,440.10 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 14 - Community Centres Swipe Card, Security & Fire Detection Systems - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Tracc Civil Pty Ltd |
$48,971.68 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 3 - Provision Of Hydraulic Services At Mary Lindsay Homestead Yanchep - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002953 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation June 2017 - $17,871.87 Breakdown On Page 54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002954 |
12/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - 29.03.2017 - 28.04.2017 - $32,109.86 - Breakdown On Page 53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002955 |
12/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pindan Pty Ltd |
$1,392,201.10 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 13 - Civic Centre Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002956 |
13/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bistel Construction Pty Ltd |
$367,339.03 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 5 - Construction Of Yanchep District Sports Amenities Building - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002957 |
14/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Village Sounds |
$27,500.00 |
|
|
|
Deposit - Performance At Presents Concert - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|||
|
00002958 |
17/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture |
$171,021.14 |
|
|
|
Oval Groundworks - Yanchep District Open Space - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002959 |
18/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$20,739.75 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002960 |
18/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$465.90 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Alinta Sales Pty Ltd |
$10,730.94 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$6,068.59 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges – June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken |
$156.52 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$1,942.70 |
|
|
|
Mailroon Monthly Fee - IM |
|
|
|
|
Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd |
$74,075.98 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Corporate Travel - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Cyber Liability - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Contracts Works - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Personal Accident - Volunteers, Councillors - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Management Liability - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Marine Cargo - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$548.00 |
|
|
|
Road Name Change - IT |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$311,084.63 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Crime - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Bushfire - Enterprise Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Liability Protection Policy - Risk Management |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Rachael Wright |
$2,288.25 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Study Assistance - Management Of Real Estate (Graduate Certificate Business Administration) |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$147.15 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$127,150.00 |
|
|
|
Disconnect/Reconnect - Christian Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Relocation Of Assets - Pipidinny/Beonaddy Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Feasibility Study - Kingsway Sporting Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Streetlight Upgrade - Sydney Road - Capital Works |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002961 |
18/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$1,062.71 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$230,708.79 |
|
|
|
Install Footpath - Ocean Reef - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Install Pathway - Trevallay Avenue - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Construction Limestone Footpath - Ocean Reef Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Footpath - Kingsway Dog Area - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$450,850.43 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 10 - Yanchep Active Open Space - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Kal Tire (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$380.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$278,335.49 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 5 - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Zenith Low Loaders |
$917.40 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002962 |
18/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Modular WA |
$50,115.16 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim - Two Rocks Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002963 |
19/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd |
$130.47 |
|
|
|
Fuels Cards For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002964 |
20/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shelford Constructions Pty Ltd |
$360,300.60 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 6 - Construction Of Sports Amenities Building & Carpark Riverlinks - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002965 |
20/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
|
|
|
|
Payment Incorrectly Cancelled After Transfer (Replaced By EFT 2973) Tax Payable As Of June 2017 Bas Return - Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002966 |
21/07/2017 |
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002967 |
21/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
360 Environmental Pty Ltd |
$39,366.80 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Fee - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Wanneroo Local Biodiversity Strategy - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
A D Engineering International Pty Ltd |
$2,760.99 |
|
|
|
Remote Control Transmitter - Community Facilities |
|
|
|
|
A1 Furniture Restorations |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Restore Mayor's Office - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Abrasive Trust |
$428.80 |
|
|
|
Spray Pack Highway - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Repair/Service Wheel Chair Hoist - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Acquapole Australasia |
$374.00 |
|
|
|
Aqua Combat Gloves - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
ACS Fabrication (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,101.00 |
|
|
|
Netball Storage Box - Projects |
|
|
|
|
ACTE Pty Ltd |
$5,239.30 |
|
|
|
Ethical Hacker Security Training - 1 X Attendee - IT |
|
|
|
|
Reference Books - IT |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$1,264.53 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
ADBird Engineering |
$4,389.00 |
|
|
|
Road Safety Audits - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Apparel |
$176.00 |
|
|
|
Cargo Pants - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Advance Press (2013) Pty Ltd |
$869.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Dog And Cat Registration Application - Safety And Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
AGM Automation North |
$2,370.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Gates - South Entry - AOC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Aimee Sullivan Hamilton |
$1,620.00 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks Fitness Program - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Air Communications |
$11,438.90 |
|
|
|
QB Link Cables And Ties - IT |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$874.64 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd |
$1,441.00 |
|
|
|
Software Maintenance Renewal - Up To 29.08.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Albury Enviro Bags |
$2,288.00 |
|
|
|
Promotional Items - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Alchemy Technology |
$15,774.00 |
|
|
|
SMS Software Maintenance To 30.06.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Alcolizer Technology |
$2,134.00 |
|
|
|
Breath Tester - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
60th Wedding Anniversary - J And B Wright - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
|
Allmark & Associates Pty Ltd |
$231.00 |
|
|
|
Stainless Steel Plaque - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$133.19 |
|
|
|
2 X Self Ink Stamps - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Self Ink Stamp - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Altus Planning & Appeals |
$22,601.72 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Sat Planning - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Planning Consultant Services Relating To SAT - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,409.70 |
|
|
|
Fertilisers & Chemicals - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Aquasol Pty Ltd |
$665.50 |
|
|
|
June Service - Water Filter - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Archival Survival Pty Ltd |
$139.87 |
|
|
|
Double Sided Tape - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Arcus Wire Group Pty Ltd |
$499.95 |
|
|
|
Art Wire - Connected And Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$516.54 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Art On The Move |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Art On The Move Membership - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Arteil WA Pty Ltd |
$489.50 |
|
|
|
Office Chair - Accounts Services |
|
|
|
|
Arup |
$22,691.63 |
|
|
|
Transport Modelling Analysis - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
ASA Appliance Services |
$227.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Oven - Oldham Park Community Facility - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram |
$2,697.93 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Association for Services to Torture Trauma Survivors Incorporated |
$900.00 |
|
|
|
Training – 14.06.2017 - 21 Attendees - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Astron Environmental Services Pty Ltd |
$2,145.00 |
|
|
|
Install Moisture - Lake Badgerup Projects |
|
|
|
|
Auscontact Association Limited |
$650.00 |
|
|
|
Corporate Membership – Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Ausrecords |
$603.90 |
|
|
|
Tube Clips - IT |
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd |
$138.07 |
|
|
|
Annual License Agreement - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Corporate Essentials |
$2,244.00 |
|
|
|
Promotional Items - Waste Education Campaign - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute Of Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander Studies |
$208.50 |
|
|
|
Indigenous Maps - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$1,649.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Word Intermediate - M Thornber - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Training - English Course 03.07.2017 - Communications And Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Australian Local Government Women’s Association |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
ALGWA Networking Breakfast Canberra - Mayor Roberts |
|
|
|
|
Australian Organisational Excellence Foundation Limited |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Awards Night Table - June 2017 - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty |
$3,440.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Chainsaw & Assessment X 16 Staff 07 - 08.06.2017 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$448.09 |
|
|
|
Carry Out Warranty Work - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Bank of I.D.E.A.S. |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop - Community Building 01.06.2017 - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
BDO Corporate Finance (WA) Pty Ltd |
$11,528.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$33,047.91 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$64,865.44 |
|
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bengineering Transport Equipment |
$4,235.00 |
|
|
|
Supply & Fit Cab Mounting Bracket - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cablift WN 33410 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
BGC Concrete |
$5,346.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bidfood Perth |
$1,720.09 |
|
|
|
Tea/Coffee, Spoons & Plates - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Bindi Bindi Dreaming |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Bindi Bindi Dreaming Catering 28.06.2017 - Community Health |
|
|
|
|
Yarn At Girrawheen Hub - 11.07.2017 - Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$128.70 |
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Various Locations - Engineering/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$3,399.41 |
|
|
|
Caps X 50 - Communications Marketing Events |
|
|
|
|
8GB USB X 78 - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
100 Custom Printed Lanyards - Place Strengthening |
|
|
|
|
Team Event & Program Shirts - Health And Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
White Saturn Power Bank - Youth Development |
|
|
|
|
Bluearth Foundation |
$3,385.80 |
|
|
|
Multisport Holiday Program - July 2017 - Leisure |
|
|
|
|
BM Tronics WA |
$7,328.20 |
|
|
|
Upgrade To Navman GPS Systems - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Deinstall/Install 2 X GPS - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Boating Camping Fishing |
$44.00 |
|
|
|
Supply Of Replacement Tent Pegs For Marquees - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$55.35 |
|
|
|
Nitorgen & Oxygen Cylinders - Fleet/Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Boral Bricks Western Australia Pty Ltd |
$119.86 |
|
|
|
Pavers - Hampshire - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group |
$2,846.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$1,496.17 |
|
|
|
Sprayer - Parks |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$3,317.56 |
|
|
|
Fuel - Unleaded - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Bradbury Sewell Pty Ltd |
$4,070.00 |
|
|
|
Dilapidation Survey - Hartman Drive Shared Pathway - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$667.70 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For Health |
|
|
|
|
Bubdesk Pty Ltd |
$3,500.00 |
|
|
|
Co-Working Furniture - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$21,013.72 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Budo Group Pty Ltd |
$51,755.30 |
|
|
|
Free Standing Single Unit Toilet - Kingsway Soccer - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Installation Of Kingsway Soccer Accessible Toilet - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Supply Concrete Pad & Installation Of Sports Equipment Box At Gumblossom Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$2,633.50 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited |
$13,068.88 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$913.56 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge For The City |
|
|
|
|
Caltex Energy |
$244.98 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues - June 2017 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Campbells Wholesale Pty Ltd |
$374.99 |
|
|
|
Paints And Primer - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$9,801.50 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$18,157.15 |
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Caring Communities Incorporated |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Cyber Safety Presentation And Information Stand - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$3,054.90 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste Material - Parks And Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$84,672.16 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cat Welfare Society Incorporated |
$2,275.00 |
|
|
|
Daily Impound Fees - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Cathedral Office Products Pty Ltd |
$1,804.00 |
|
|
|
Porcelain Whiteboard With Laser Lines & Letters - Animal Care Centre |
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$2,704.90 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$5,931.96 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$5,557.84 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chillo Refrigeration & Air-Conditioning |
$211.75 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Fridge - Billabong Lunchroom - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Choices Flooring Joondalup |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Carpet Tiles Installation & Removal - Girrawheen Hub - Place Strengthening |
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography |
$3,410.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
City of Stirling |
$1,074.83 |
|
|
|
Transfer Of LSL Liability - Stephen Hall - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$543,521.48 |
|
|
|
Annual License Fee - Authority 01.07.2016 - 30.06.2017 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Trim Licences 2017 / 2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$73,339.28 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Nissan |
$248.78 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Close The Loop Ltd |
$1,633.50 |
|
|
|
Pens With Logo - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Coachtrans |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Part Of Bus Repaint After Wanneroo Connect Stickers Removed - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Coastal Roofing WA Pty Ltd |
$38,192.00 |
|
|
|
Roofing - Roof Plumbing - Yanchep Lagoon Alfresco Roof - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Roofing - Roof Plumbing - Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Supply - Fix Roof Anchor Points - Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$5,963.98 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$769.52 |
|
|
|
Beverages - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Colin Penter |
$4,800.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Age-Friendly Communities Strategy - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Collins Craft & School Supplies |
$31.61 |
|
|
|
Craft Supplies - Museum Holiday Program - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$44.70 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Police Checks X 3 - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Community Arts Network WA Ltd |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Creative Industry Forum - 21.06.2017 - 1 X Attendee - King Street Arts Centre |
|
|
|
|
Computer Badge Embroidery |
$145.64 |
|
|
|
Velcro Name Badges - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Construct360 Pty Ltd |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
|
Install Hand Dryer - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Scorecard |
$3,246.54 |
|
|
|
Financial Assessments - Contracts And Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Security Australia Pty Ltd |
$315.38 |
|
|
|
Security - Gala Dinner - Communications |
|
|
|
|
Correct Training |
$4,420.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Forklift & Yellow Card - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$506.00 |
|
|
|
Signs - Footpath Closed - Trandos Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Orange Flagging - Trandos Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Couplers Malaga |
$73.41 |
|
|
|
Air Fittings Coupling - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$106.79 |
|
|
|
Courier Charge - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts |
$1,638.75 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
CR Kennedy & Co Pty Ltd |
$153.12 |
|
|
|
Antenna Adaptor - Survey |
|
|
|
|
Replacement Of GPS Pole Tip - Survey Services |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Ltd |
$14,414.20 |
|
|
|
Smoke/Fire Alarms Services/Callouts - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Fire Extinguisher/Hydrant Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CSP Group |
$141.40 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cubic Promotions Pty Ltd |
$775.50 |
|
|
|
Promotional Goods - Waste Educational Program |
|
|
|
|
Cubic Solutions Pty Ltd |
$5,964.75 |
|
|
|
Soakway System - Quinns Carpark Assets |
|
|
|
|
Culture Counts (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Culture Counts Part Payment Annual Subscription - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Curtin University of Technology |
$5,700.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 2017 Curtin Ignition Program - 2 Delegates - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Cyber8Lab |
$402.30 |
|
|
|
Organising Cybersecurity, Consultation Fee & Networking Drinks - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$159.50 |
|
|
|
Service - WN 33869 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Daniel Noel Patrick Devellerez |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Marketing Workshop - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Daniels Health Services Pty Ltd |
$135.22 |
|
|
|
Delivery And Pickup Of S22 Sharpsmart Bins - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited |
$20,744.19 |
|
|
|
Microsoft Licenses - IT |
|
|
|
|
Techsmith Snaglt License - IT |
|
|
|
|
Power Bi Pro User License - It |
|
|
|
|
Exchange Health Check - IT |
|
|
|
|
Datacom Systems (WA) Pty Ltd |
$26,247.72 |
|
|
|
Managed Services June 2017 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance Renewal - IT |
|
|
|
|
Datavoice Communications Pty Ltd |
$2,112.00 |
|
|
|
Supply & Install 6 X 1120E Telephones - IT |
|
|
|
|
David Golf & Engineering Pty Ltd |
$3,790.58 |
|
|
|
New Flags, Cups And Flag Poles - Marangaroo & Carramar Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
David Wills and Associates |
$5,401.00 |
|
|
|
Engineering Services - Belgrade Park Village Drainage Works - Assets |
|
|
|
|
DBS Fencing |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Mesh Black Fencing - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
De Vita & Dixon Lawyers |
$12,595.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Delion Pty Ltd |
$5,936.04 |
|
|
|
Managed Adsl2+ Wireless Hotspot - Banksia Grove - IT |
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,985.80 |
|
|
|
Dell P2417H 23.8" Monitor - IT |
|
|
|
|
Projector Base - It |
|
|
|
|
Laptops And Accessories - It |
|
|
|
|
Department of Aboriginal Affairs |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Reconciliation 2017 Banner - Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Department Of Parks And Wildlife |
$24,000.00 |
|
|
|
Pilot Park Discount Program Agreement Payment - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Derby Rubber Products Pty Ltd |
$2,432.54 |
|
|
|
Traffic Counter Tube - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Road Flap - Wanneroo Community Centre - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Security |
$4,478.08 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas |
$37,183.53 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$19,284.43 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts/Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Power Cable, Microphone Bracket - CESM Wanneroo Vehicle - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
DMB Fluid Technologies Pty Ltd |
$298.65 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Domus Nursery |
$12,002.32 |
|
|
|
Supply Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd |
$40,804.94 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 13 - Install Swipe Cards & Security CCTV - Alexander Heights Care Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$141,987.11 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Various Locations - Engineering/Assets |
|
|
|
|
Doyenne |
$475.00 |
|
|
|
Group Fitness Classes - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$151,382.14 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping/Drain Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Driving Wheels |
$858.00 |
|
|
|
Wheel Alignments - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Supply & Fit Castor Wedge - WN 251 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Euthanasia X 6 Canine/Feline - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Microchip X 10 Canine/Feline - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
D-Tech Mechanical |
$1,149.50 |
|
|
|
3 Monthly Service - Generator - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Dy-Mark (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$430.36 |
|
|
|
Marker Paint - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$2,228.20 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Ecowater WA |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
Service Fee - Fujiclean System - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$1,935.97 |
|
|
|
Return To Work Monitoring - Safety Systems |
|
|
|
|
Job Analysis - Events Officer People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Edith Cowan University |
$22,451.55 |
|
|
|
Monitoring Of Ground Water - Yellagonga Water Quality - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
Educational Art Supplies |
$520.25 |
|
|
|
Stationary - Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
ELB Pty Ltd |
$246.50 |
|
|
|
Replacement Lamp - Epson - IT |
|
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms |
$1,457.50 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$28,859.31 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga |
$4,103.00 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
White Logo On Navy Towels - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Emerg Solutions Pty Ltd |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Bart Subscription - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Encanta Event Management |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
|
Conference - Road Safety Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Entire IT |
$3,274.54 |
|
|
|
Onsite Software Maintenance - Imac - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Subscription - 2 X Adobe Creative Cloud Licensing - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Health Australia (Western Australia) |
$2,160.00 |
|
|
|
Corporate Membership - Corporate Member Level 2 (WA Corporate 12 Member) 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$143,321.11 |
|
|
|
Water Truck Hire - June 2017 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Weed Control - Various Locations - Conservation/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - April 2017 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
4 X Trees - Lenore Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
EnvisionWare Pty Ltd |
$830.50 |
|
|
|
Connection Requirements - IT |
|
|
|
|
ENZED Service Centre Perth North |
$2,847.85 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Epcad Pty Ltd |
$16,500.00 |
|
|
|
Neerabup Market Positioning Study - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australia Information Service and Solutions Pty Ltd |
$678.38 |
|
|
|
Bureau Charges - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$4,218.67 |
|
|
|
Sit Stand Workfit - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Office Chair X 3 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd |
$708.40 |
|
|
|
Monthly Charge Parts Washer - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Evolution Sports Imports Pty Ltd |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Futsal Mimas - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Excalibur Printing |
$640.08 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Experience Perth |
$635.00 |
|
|
|
Brochure For International Consumer Shows - Tourism |
|
|
|
|
Gold Membership Renewal 2017 - Advocacy And Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$480.58 |
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
FE Technologies Pty Ltd |
$17,974.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance - IT |
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services |
$41,060.25 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA |
$423.24 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Flex Fitness Equipment |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Slam Balls - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd |
$586.08 |
|
|
|
Brake & Parts Cleaner - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Frame Mixed Reality Pty Ltd |
$5,189.00 |
|
|
|
Tender Preparation - 27.06.2017 - Advocacy And Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
30 Second Augmented Reality Animation And Application - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Fremantle Arts Centre Press |
$34.89 |
|
|
|
Books - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$3,975.62 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$875.89 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Gaia's Organic Gardens |
$233.75 |
|
|
|
Garden Bed Lesson And Maintenance Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$134,029.80 |
|
|
|
Chipper/Pruning/Stump Grinding - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$17,267.25 |
|
|
|
MRRG Road Improvements Grant 2018 / 2019 - Traffic & Transport |
|
|
|
|
Water Main Concept Design - Connolly Drive - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Gina McGill |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Wanjoo Books - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Global Marine Enclosures Pty Ltd |
$4,583.35 |
|
|
|
Year 1 - Quinns Beach Swimming Enclosure Monitoring June 2017 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Global Turf Projects Pty Ltd |
$1,152.80 |
|
|
|
Marix Cover - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Globe Australia |
$844.80 |
|
|
|
Brushwet - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota |
$124,108.50 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Corolla Sedan X 2 - $24,216.48 each |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Hilux Workmate X 2 - $37,837.77 each |
|
|
|
|
Grass Growers |
$17,554.61 |
|
|
|
Disposal Waste Dumping - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenwaste Taken To Neerabup - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Greenwaste - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$695.75 |
|
|
|
Hiab - Kingsway Football - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Groeneveld Lubrication Solutions Pty Ltd |
$363.44 |
|
|
|
Greenlube - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hall & Wilcox |
$4,910.40 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hampers By Design |
$108.00 |
|
|
|
Chocolate Box Hamper - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$3,412.97 |
|
|
|
Quinns Carpark Extension - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Hardy Spicer |
$951.50 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$1,455.71 |
|
|
|
Newspapers For The City |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,808.31 |
|
|
|
Gloves For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics |
$389.38 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hendercare |
$19,873.53 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Hendry Group Pty Ltd |
$4,900.50 |
|
|
|
Building Assessment - Koondoola Community Centre - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$4,500.10 |
|
|
|
Capping Repair - Eiffel Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Pavers - Nankeen - Eiffel Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Painting - 7 X Light Poles - Quinns Mindarie Surf Club - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Limestone - Forecastle Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Limestone - Spinifex Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hinds Sand Supplies |
$547.66 |
|
|
|
Turf Sand - Quinns Mindarie Surf Lifesaving Club - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty |
$992.62 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Holton Connor Pty Ltd |
$2,992.00 |
|
|
|
Architectural Services - Yanchep Open Space Amenities - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$1,837.80 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$10,209.65 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Horizon West Landscape Construction |
$89,914.00 |
|
|
|
Landscaping Works - Mary Lindsay Homestead Development - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$9,783.40 |
|
|
|
Quinns Carpark Extension - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hydro Plan |
$2,145.00 |
|
|
|
WCC Irrigation Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$111,091.20 |
|
|
|
Electrical Irrigation Works - Various Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
IKEA |
$215.00 |
|
|
|
Stools And Chairs For Tracey Moffatt Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$42,639.30 |
|
|
|
Flags & Indoor Bases - Kingsway Indoor Sports Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Dog Exercise Beach - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Corflute Signs - Tracey Moffatt - Book Week - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Bookplate Stickers For Gallery - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Emu Dreaming Panels - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Decals - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Laminated - Mounted Photo Prints - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Corflute Signs - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Design Work - Scar Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Artwork Redesign - Volunteering Report - Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Supply Presentation Tables - Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Signs - 3 X Information/History - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
External Signage - Kingsway Indoor Stadium - East & West Wall Graphics - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Sky Signage - Kingsway Indoor Stadium - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
InfoCouncil Pty Ltd |
$6,677.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Help Desk Fee - 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Initial Hygiene |
$6,919.23 |
|
|
|
Hygienic Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services |
$5,003.08 |
|
|
|
Call Centre Services - May 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$2,317.37 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilet - Staff Cultural Training - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilets - Riverlinks Park - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$22,812.96 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intercity Office Partitioning |
$4,653.00 |
|
|
|
New Partition - Building One Depot - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Forum - Enhancing Asset Management Forum - 2 X Attendee - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Isentia Pty Ltd |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Media Monitoring - June 2017 - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$2,098.76 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$2,845.57 |
|
|
|
Safety Items - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Stock For Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Jadu Software Pty Ltd |
$45,592.80 |
|
|
|
Annual Support & Maintenance - IT |
|
|
|
|
Jalaru Photography |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Light Scars Photography 13.07.2017 - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$11,518.93 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Janet Carter |
$1,080.00 |
|
|
|
Tracey Moffatt - AV Installation - Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Janis Rudolfs Nedela |
$555.39 |
|
|
|
Valuation Of 12 Le Buse Sculptures - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Jaycar Pty Ltd |
$281.85 |
|
|
|
Headphones, Headphone Splitters & Cables - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Cabling - Tracey Moffatt Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$489.30 |
|
|
|
Equipment - Tracey Moffatt Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
JH Fluid Transfer Solutions Pty Ltd |
$691.49 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Jim Kidd Sports |
$1,572.67 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Jodie Aedy |
$2,537.50 |
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Girrawheen Hub - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Local Place Profile - Girrawheen/Koondoola - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Workshop Flyer - Healthy And Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Actions & Strategies - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Corporate Business Plan 2017 - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services - Strategic Community Plant 2017 / 2018 - 2026 / 2027 - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
John Hughes Mitsubishi |
$15,824.20 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Hyundai Accent $15,824.20 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Coachline |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Hire - Gold Program - J & J Carriage Way & Moore River - Programs |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$4,064.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$2,230.17 |
|
|
|
Motor Vehicle Excess Payment WN 33360 - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - WN 33929 - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
JSB Fencing and Machinery Hire |
$7,254.50 |
|
|
|
Fence Repairs - Heacham Avenue - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Install Chainmesh - Ocean Reef Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Remove Fencing - Quinns Carpark Extension - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Repair Fence - Houghton Skate Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Tennis Court Fence - Bellport Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Damaged Mesh - Cricket Nets - Houghton Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Damaged Mesh - Anthony Waring Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Jumanga Olives |
$1,487.50 |
|
|
|
85 X Bottle Infused Olive Oil & 85 X Dukkah Gift Packs - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
KDAire Mechanical Services |
$47,449.37 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kennards Hire Pty Ltd |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Heater Infrared Diesel - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$19,672.19 |
|
|
|
Install Kerbing/Footpaths - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Shorehaven/Bluewater - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Kidsafe WA Incorporated |
$35,002.00 |
|
|
|
Pre And Post Installation Audit - Shade Sail - Ian Robbins Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Play Equipment Audit - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$6,011.50 |
|
|
|
Pressure Clean - Landford Boulevard - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Pressure Clean - Bower Grove - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
High Pressure Clean - Yanchep Beach Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
High Pressure Cleaning - Civic Centre - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
USB X 4 - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Komatsu Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,530.03 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts/Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Konnect (Coventry Fasteners) |
$428.67 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Kore Works |
$742.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Safe Transporting In Buses 06.07.2017 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
KP & DG Harding |
$9,522.37 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$4,475.88 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Label Magic |
$622.60 |
|
|
|
Stickers - Battery/Oil Recycling - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Ladybird's Plant Hire |
$256.30 |
|
|
|
Rental Of Indoor Plants - June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Landcorp |
$89.00 |
|
|
|
Property Council Breakfast - New Era In Coastal Development 21.07.2017 - 1 X Attendee - Approvals |
|
|
|
|
Landmark |
$8.29 |
|
|
|
Late Payment Interest - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Landmark Engineering & Design Pty Ltd |
$2,923.80 |
|
|
|
Drink Fountain For Peridot Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Mini Hardware & Boxes Galore |
$131.60 |
|
|
|
Water Bottles - 5 Litre - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Lantern Creative Pty Ltd |
$4,115.10 |
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy - Ridgewood Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$1,323.27 |
|
|
|
Washing Of Linen - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Services - April 2017 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor |
$16,033.41 |
|
|
|
Dry Parks Maintenance - 23.05.2017 - 16.06.2017 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$313,184.70 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Leave It To Leslie |
$221.10 |
|
|
|
Assorted Puppets - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Lennys Commercial Kitchens |
$1,835.90 |
|
|
|
2 X Simply Stainless Mobile Benches With Solid Shelf Under - Girrawheen/Koondoola Seniors Citizens Centre - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$1,384.11 |
|
|
|
Group Fitness License Fee - July 2017 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Life Academy |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Cultural Awareness - 28.06.2017 - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Lightforce Assets Pty Ltd |
$75,366.54 |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Safety Barrier - Pipidinny Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Delineators - Pipidinny Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Handrail - Hartman Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Linkwest Incorporated |
$162.00 |
|
|
|
Membership - Yanchep Community Centre 01.07.17 - 30.06.18 - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals Aust WA |
$130.00 |
|
|
|
CDN Reconciliation Week Forum - 2 X Attendees |
|
|
|
|
Louise Lorna Hendricks |
$3,960.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Media And Communication X 4 - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
$10,188.30 |
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy - Kingsway Baseball Clubrooms - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Landscape Design & Development - Yanchep Open Space - Assets |
|
|
|
|
M&A Cafe Enterprises |
$302.50 |
|
|
|
WBA Cybersecurity Presentation - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Maali Mia Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of Clapping Sticks - Aboriginal Museum In A Box - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Maar Koodjal |
$4,250.00 |
|
|
|
Cultural Awareness Training - 28.06.2017 - Health |
|
|
|
|
Turner Collection - Wanneroo Museum Indigenous - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Midway Review - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,338.18 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$1,397.44 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$101,253.57 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McInerney Sales Pty Ltd |
$85,793.15 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Ford Ranger 2017 - WN 34041 - $42,900.35 |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Ford Ranger 2017 - WN 34042 - $42,892.80 |
|
|
|
|
McLernons Means Business |
$1,684.00 |
|
|
|
Furniture - Matrix Desk - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Mehdi Rasulle |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Artist Consultancy - Concept Contract Meeting - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Mercury Group of Companies Pty Ltd |
$5,120.72 |
|
|
|
E-Recruit Monthly Software Fee - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$752.46 |
|
|
|
Interactive Voice Recordings - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$102.80 |
|
|
|
Stationery Supplies - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Cash Register Company |
$173.38 |
|
|
|
Thermal Paper Rolls - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$67.91 |
|
|
|
Steel Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$422,588.45 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$7,681.85 |
|
|
|
Fuel - June - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Minuteman Press - Wanneroo |
$549.00 |
|
|
|
Brochures - Full Colour - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$8,173.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Playground Equipment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Shade Sail Design - Frederick Stubbs Reserve - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors |
$842.00 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Conservation/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mobile Mouse |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Microsoft Word Essentials 22.08.2017 - 1 X Attendee - Building Approvals |
|
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd |
$124.14 |
|
|
|
Creche Wooden Blocks - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Modular WA |
$41,400.70 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim - Two Rocks Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Move It Removals & Storage & Boxes |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Ceremony Set Up/Dismantle - Citizenship Ceremonies - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Mowmaster Turf Equipment |
$66.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mr Denis McLeod |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of 1 X WA Planning Handbook - Legal Services |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Joanne Panomarenko |
$410.00 |
|
|
|
Carriage Homestead Visit 05.07.2017 - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
Mustang Print & Copy |
$775.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Fire Permit Books - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$216,170.52 |
|
|
|
Works For Conservation Offset Sites - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Neopost Australia Pty Ltd |
$189.04 |
|
|
|
Printroom Supplies - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Netsight Pty Ltd |
$33,464.75 |
|
|
|
Licence Fee - Adding SWMD Module - Safety Systems |
|
|
|
|
Myosh Hours/Modifications - Myosh - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Myosh Annual Subscription 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Newsxpress Ocean Keys |
$87.60 |
|
|
|
Newspapers - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
|
Nextmedia Pty Ltd |
$594.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Art Almanac - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Non Organic Disposal |
$66.00 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Noongar Boodja Language Cultural Aboriginal Corporation |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Book Resources - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$3,964.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$832.05 |
|
|
|
Whipper Guard - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Chaps - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$65.00 |
|
|
|
95211 Repair Stone Chip - Front Windscreen - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
NRG Force |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Furniture For The Girrawheen Hub - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Nuford |
$483.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting |
$2,860.00 |
|
|
|
Beach Cleaning - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$1,084.79 |
|
|
|
Colour Printer Charges - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Basic Charge - Scanner - IT |
|
|
|
|
Ocean Website Design |
$429.00 |
|
|
|
Flyer Distribution - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$54,530.65 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Officemax |
$497.20 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$1,135.03 |
|
|
|
2 X Perpetual Year Planners - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Materials - Waste Education Campaign - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Waste Box - Pens And Markers - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix Digital Camera - Ranger Services |
|
|
|
|
Ognenis Surveying Trust |
$2,970.00 |
|
|
|
Feature Survey - Old Yanchep Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Opposite Lock - Wangara |
$1,238.93 |
|
|
|
Safety Aerial & Folding Bracket - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd |
$12,355.35 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Marmion Avenue & Neerabup Road Duplication - Projects |
|
|
|
|
OSHGroup Pty Ltd |
$1,812.80 |
|
|
|
Fitness For Work - Complex & Report - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Fitness For Work - Attendance & Report - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Owen Consulting Quantity Surveyors & Construction Consultants |
$9,350.00 |
|
|
|
Quantity Surveying - Riverlinks Park Sports Amenities Building - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Quantity Surveying - Yanchep Active Open Space - Projects |
|
|
|
|
PAC Fire Australia |
$131.78 |
|
|
|
ESL Stickers - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$28,396.00 |
|
|
|
Arboriculture Reports - Trees In Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parins |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Motor Vehicle Excess Payment WN 33741 - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
|
Pavement Analysis Pty Ltd |
$30,648.75 |
|
|
|
Pavement Investigation - Gnangara Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre |
$368.50 |
|
|
|
Community Transport Bus Cleaning - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Perth Floor Cleaning |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Clean Mens Toilet Floor - Aoc Building 3 - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$649.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet/Waste |
|
|
|
|
Perth Relaxation Therapy |
$190.00 |
|
|
|
Relaxation Classes - Quinns Day Centre - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Petra Clean |
$5,038.00 |
|
|
|
Carpet Cleaning - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Motors of Wanneroo |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Service - WN 33463 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting |
$1,375.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Decking - Kalbarri - Parks |
|
|
|
|
PJ Wright & Associates |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 2 - Mary Lindsay House - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$55,142.30 |
|
|
|
Plant Supply - Various Sites - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Plants Supplies - Appleby Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Propagation Of Tubestock - Koondoola Reserve - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Plants - Connolly Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Platinum Window Tinting & Glass Repair |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Install Automotive Film - Truck Windows - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Playmaster Pty Ltd |
$151.80 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment Accessories - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Powdersafe Pty Ltd |
$412.50 |
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance - Powdersafe System - IT |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$175,294.10 |
|
|
|
Alarms/CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$1,323.56 |
|
|
|
Printing - Direct Debit Membership Books - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Flyers - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Membership Agreement Pads - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Priority 1 Fire & Safety Pty Ltd |
$1,870.00 |
|
|
|
Confined Space Entry Training - 03.07.2017 - Aquamotion Staff |
|
|
|
|
Pro Av Solutions (WA) |
$130.90 |
|
|
|
Replacement Headphones - Bio Box - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Pro-Am Australia |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Super Raft - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Prodesign Lighting Pty Ltd |
$693.00 |
|
|
|
Light Replacement - Museum And Arts |
|
|
|
|
Productive Plastics |
$335.50 |
|
|
|
Acrylic Box With Diameter Hole - Museum |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$7,917.22 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Protiviti Pty Ltd |
$4,158.00 |
|
|
|
Facilitation Of Risk Workshop - IT |
|
|
|
|
Pyrios Pty Ltd |
$4,427.29 |
|
|
|
Purchase New IT Equipment And Software - Activation Of Girrawheen Hub - IT |
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$1,309.00 |
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Sand Testing - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rock Bush Fire Brigade |
$358.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Blower Vac - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Garden Maintenance - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$950.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Call Out Fees - Community Services/Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Ralph Beattie Bosworth |
$4,235.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Wanneroo Civic Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
RAMM Software Ltd |
$24,480.05 |
|
|
|
Annual Support And Maintenance - 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 |
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd |
$479.99 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management |
$7,836.58 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services - IM |
|
|
|
|
Reece's Hire & Structures |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$109,727.88 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,294.99 |
|
|
|
Image Charges - Print room |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Finance |
$3,294.50 |
|
|
|
Lease Of Printers - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Rics Oceania |
$1,038.03 |
|
|
|
Training - Valuation For Non Valuers - 3 X Attendees - Land & Leasing |
|
|
|
|
Riot Art & Craft |
$442.64 |
|
|
|
Supplies - Alkimos Pop Up Library |
|
|
|
|
Craft Items - Girrawheen Book Week - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Riskwest |
$4,834.50 |
|
|
|
Professional Fees - Strategic Land Acquisition Risk Review |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$9,012.52 |
|
|
|
Pavement Marking - Pipidinny Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking - Old Yanchep Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Spotting - Glossop Street - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$657,531.18 |
|
|
|
Roadworks For The City |
|
|
|
|
Roberts Day Group Pty Ltd |
$23,262.80 |
|
|
|
Place Valuation & Vibrancy Assessment - Property |
|
|
|
|
Ron Van Baaren |
$4,125.00 |
|
|
|
Training - OSH Leader - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Driver Assessments - Funded Services Staff |
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,094.36 |
|
|
|
Cabin Container Hire - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
RPS Australia West Pty Ltd |
$8,250.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Jimbub Park Drainage Design - Projects |
|
|
|
|
RS Components Pty Ltd |
$91.51 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
RSA Signs Pty Ltd |
$15,071.77 |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Pedestrian Grab Rails - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Shared Path - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign Poles - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - CCTV, Dog Exercise & Do Not Feed Birds - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Prohibited Wood Collecting - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Leap Frogs & Mini Golf - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Rubek Automatic Doors |
$242.00 |
|
|
|
Service Door - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
S & C Linemarking |
$6,365.26 |
|
|
|
Linemarking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Safeman WA Pty Ltd |
$763.66 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Safer Sands |
$7,667.32 |
|
|
|
Sand/Softfall Cleaning - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue |
$935.00 |
|
|
|
Inspection - Height Safety Equipment - Yanchep Tower - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Safety World |
$809.99 |
|
|
|
Safety Glasses & Wipes - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Mechanics Glove & Navy Pants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd |
$47,598.96 |
|
|
|
Renew On-Line Premium 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Scatena Clocherty Architects |
$4,735.50 |
|
|
|
Architectural Services - Riverlinks Park Changerooms & Amenities Building - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$2,225.47 |
|
|
|
Lift Service - 4 X Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$17,219.40 |
|
|
|
Printing - Whats Happening Newsletter - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Yanchep Rates Flyer - Tourism |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Rates Leaflets - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$975.43 |
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Communications Marketing & Events |
|
|
|
|
Shelford Constructions Pty Ltd |
$13,270.55 |
|
|
|
Claim Number 1 - Construction Of Ridgewood Park Multi-Purpose Room - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$1,360.11 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemical Supplies - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Sign Supermarket |
$1,645.00 |
|
|
|
Window Decals - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Emu Footprints & Feathers - Remove Lion Prints - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Tracey Moffat Signage - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Sign Synergy Pty Ltd |
$374.00 |
|
|
|
Install Film To New Doors - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Wanneroo Sports & Social Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$20,898.64 |
|
|
|
Investigation/Validation Report - 4 X Parks - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Remove Asbestos - Newlyn Park - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Skateboarding WA |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Skateboarding Jam Session - June 2017 - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$7,159.40 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$189,826.86 |
|
|
|
Streetscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Monthly Maintenance Environmental Offset Sites - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Mulching - Multiple Sites - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$4,389.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Softfall - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Southern Wire Pty Ltd |
$73,499.80 |
|
|
|
Install Garrison Fencing - Marangaroo Golf Course - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$121.44 |
|
|
|
Bin Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Tennis Court - Elliot Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$184.37 |
|
|
|
Materials For Museum Program - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Wool For Basket Weaving - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Materials for Bag Making - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$1,080.24 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Radio Transmitter Pouch - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$3,971.91 |
|
|
|
First Aid Training Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
10 X 100ml Eyewash Irrigation Station Refills - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Staples Australia Pty Ltd |
$35,333.06 |
|
|
|
Stationery For The City June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Star Automotive Accessories Pty Ltd |
$842.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$692.63 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$1,314.67 |
|
|
|
Tissues, Dishwashing Liquid, Glen 20 & Florogen - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Stats WA Pty Ltd |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
|
Material Testing - Old Yanchep Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company PTY Ltd |
$2,548.54 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
StrataGreen |
$1,003.44 |
|
|
|
Tree Ties - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Shovel Long Handle - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Structerre Consulting Engineers |
$1,853.50 |
|
|
|
Investigate & Report - Showgrounds - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Formsteel - Kingsway Scoreboard & Roller Door - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette |
$425.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Of Sports Bibs – June - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades |
$720.00 |
|
|
|
Clean Shade Sails - Rotary Park - Peridot Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Surekleen Products |
$282.04 |
|
|
|
Degreaser Quick Brake - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Swim Australia |
$422.00 |
|
|
|
Swim Australia Membership Registration - 01.08.2017 - 31.07.2018 |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$26,054.03 |
|
|
|
GST Payable For May 2017 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Techwest Solutions Pty Ltd |
$638.00 |
|
|
|
Quinns Community Centre - Independent Review Of MATV System - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Terra Perma Design |
$1,625.00 |
|
|
|
Brighton Garden Workshop - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
The Basketball Man |
$5,094.10 |
|
|
|
Repair/Replace Nets - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Install Basketball Tower - John Moloney Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Butcher Shop |
$1,567.67 |
|
|
|
Mixed Books, Markers And Spray Paint - Youth |
|
|
|
|
80 X Skate Decks - School Holiday Program - Youth |
|
|
|
|
The Institute of Internal Auditors Australia |
$1,250.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Internal Auditing - 1 X Attendee - Risk |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$10,889.00 |
|
|
|
Spinal Rescue Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Pool Lifeguard Requals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Home Swimming Pool And Spa Inspections - Health |
|
|
|
|
The Tree Guild of WA Incorporated |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Tree Guild Membership Fees 01.07.2017 - 30.06.2018 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For As One Business Trust |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Computer Artwork - Wangara Business Study - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for TLC Solutions Australia Unit Trust |
$4,840.00 |
|
|
|
Introductory Meeting - Leadership Program - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Develop Workshop & Program - Leadership Program - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Wilbro Unit Trust |
$5,038.00 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Remover - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Workwear Group Pty Ltd |
$2,515.71 |
|
|
|
Uniforms For Various Employees & Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Think Promotional |
$358.00 |
|
|
|
195 X Stylus Pens - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Tim Eva's Nursery |
$51,964.00 |
|
|
|
Plants/Chemicals - Parks |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$59,510.00 |
|
|
|
Mulch Delivery - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$578.27 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toolmart |
$303.50 |
|
|
|
Tool Purchases - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Top Of The Ladder Gutter Cleaning |
$8,756.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Downpipes & Gutters At City Buildings - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
TotalCount |
$1,628.00 |
|
|
|
People Counting Device - Girrawheen Hub - Place Strengthening |
|
|
|
|
Tourism Council Western Australia |
$2,145.00 |
|
|
|
Silver Membership 2017 / 2018 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$2,379.25 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Tracc Civil Pty Ltd |
$12,638.76 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 4 - Mary Lindsay Homestead - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Transnational (2001) Pty Ltd |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Service Radiator - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd |
$1,718.20 |
|
|
|
Air Release Valve Leisure - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Chlorine Shut Down Test - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Air Release Valve; Hydro De Filter - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Install Isolator - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$43,169.63 |
|
|
|
Irrigation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$6,106.32 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$139,579.79 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$123,693.35 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
University of Western Australia |
$8,555.21 |
|
|
|
Provision Of Research Services For The Development Of Wellbeing Indicators - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Beach Surveys - Two Rocks And Quinns - Coastal Projects |
|
|
|
|
Field Survey - Wellbeing Indicators - Healthy Communities |
|
|
|
|
Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$8,319.26 |
|
|
|
Bin Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$387.42 |
|
|
|
Radio Repairs - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$59,162.76 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
VIP Curtains & Blinds |
$2,593.00 |
|
|
|
Install Blind - Kingsway - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Install Blind - Animal Care Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Virginie Weber |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Business Incubator Workshop - Wangara Survey Results - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$231.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Roller Door - WLCC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$741,535.31 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Hino 500 Series $172,788.36 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase X 2 - Hino 500 Series - $199,006.11 Each - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Hino 500 Series - $169,928.36 - Fleet Asset |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company |
$15,149.45 |
|
|
|
BSL/Limestone/ESL - Various Locations - Assets/Conservation/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association |
$7,711.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Environmental Planning Tool - Businee Systems |
|
|
|
|
Training - Local Government Act - Advanced - 26.06.2017 - 1 X Attendee - Property |
|
|
|
|
Procurement Subscription Services - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Subscription - Governance Service |
|
|
|
|
Walter & Doolann-Leisha Eatts |
$730.00 |
|
|
|
Welcome To The Country Ceremony - Healthy & Inclusive Communities |
|
|
|
|
Wangara Volkswagen |
$338.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$742.34 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$22,045.00 |
|
|
|
June Breakfast - Tom Young - Business Assistance |
|
|
|
|
Management Of Hybrid 935 - July & August 2017 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship Instalment 1 For 2017 / 2018 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$146,769.60 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA |
$386.64 |
|
|
|
Catering - Yanchep Yspeak - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Batteries For Toy Library - Banksia Grove - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Catering - Sing & Grown - Connected And Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies - Buckingham House - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Catering - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$3,159.20 |
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$2,520.64 |
|
|
|
Name Badges - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Engraved Permabrass Plaque - Wanneroo Skate Park - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Medals & Trophies - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
WATM Crane Sales and Services WA |
$4,414.55 |
|
|
|
Repair Crane - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Annual Crane Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wave International Pty Ltd |
$5,830.00 |
|
|
|
Neerabup Earthworks Study - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$3,556.50 |
|
|
|
Nurses For Immunisation Clinic - Health |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$2,928.20 |
|
|
|
Empty Washdown Bay - Workshop - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Servicing Of Grease Traps - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$35,313.26 |
|
|
|
Delivery - Ground Green Mulch - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Green Waste Removal - Waste |
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd |
$37,416.26 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Wild West Hyundai |
$3,967.85 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - WN 33285 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$31,515.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Operational Review Of The City's Light Vehicle Fleet - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Review Of Events Management June 2017 - Risk |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Procurement And Contract Management June 2017 - Risk |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Fraud Risk Assessment - Risk |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Probity Adviser Services - Tender 17006 - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$11,830.03 |
|
|
|
Static Guards At Briefing Session - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Static Security Guard - Citizenship Ceremony - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Safety Patrol Officer - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Wood & Grieve Engineers |
$863.50 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Gumblossom Community Centre Sports Hall Climate Control - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$1,679.40 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots/Uniforms - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$70,116.09 |
|
|
|
Planting/Weed Control/Seeding/Pruning - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Printing Solutions Joondalup |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
A5 Photo Cards - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Wrong Fuel Rescue Pty Ltd |
$512.93 |
|
|
|
Wrong Fuel Recovery Registration WN 3367 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002968 |
25/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
MKDC |
$1,402.50 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 25 - Wanneroo Civic Centre - Spatial Design Consultancy - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002969 |
25/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$6,620.65 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002970 |
25/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$42.45 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$9,181.23 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City - June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$268.10 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$833.26 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$565,468.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$2,420.87 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,465.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$772.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Work On Spydus LMS - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver |
$569.97 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance May - July 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$18,165.47 |
|
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For Community Fire Manager 31.03.2017 - 29.06.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$1,969.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Search Fees June 2016 - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd |
$870.55 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$5,410.08 |
|
|
|
Land Enquiries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,060.26 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$7,086.04 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging - June 2017 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Mr Luke Jenkins |
$77.99 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Fitness Biz 2017 Seminar - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ron Hoffman |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$16,357.15 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging - June 2017 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$188.62 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Hutchinson Australia Pty Ltd |
$931.43 |
|
|
|
SMS Charges - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Treasury Corporation |
$5,280.00 |
|
|
|
Advisory Services - Land Acquisition Financial Modelling - Property |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Connection Of Power - 4 X Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002971 |
25/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs - Stone Pitching - Cockman House - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd |
$2,058.61 |
|
|
|
Licence Fees - Background Music & Fitness Classes - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Bridgeall Libraries Limited |
$18,200.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Subscription - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Carefully Considered Creative |
$1,250.00 |
|
|
|
Yokayi Girrawheen Video - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Tracey Moffatt Exhibition - Video/Animation - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Institute of Automotive Mechanical Engineers |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Capstone Assessment - 1 X Attendee - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$23,753.81 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$33,476.26 |
|
|
|
Handweeding - Amstel Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Weed Control X 8 Sites - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$122.55 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$201,722.20 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Pitney Bowes Australia Pty Ltd |
$10,084.80 |
|
|
|
Mapinfo Pro Licenses X 12 - Technical Support & Maintenance 22.08.2017 - 21.08.2018 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$1,304.38 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Safety Signs Service |
$775.50 |
|
|
|
Various Signs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Seton Australia |
$912.34 |
|
|
|
PPE Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Custom Poly Sign - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Shelter WA |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Donation - Homelessness Week - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Sign A Rama |
$3,469.63 |
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Rowmark Labels - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous - Full Colour Digital Print Stock - Connected & Resilient Communities |
|
|
|
|
Stats WA Pty Ltd |
$1,083.50 |
|
|
|
Road Material Testing - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$9,473.76 |
|
|
|
GST Payable For June 2017 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
The Digital Imagineers Company Pty |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Short Clip Video Production - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$257.36 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Stationery - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Westrac |
$7,385.07 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002972 |
27/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation July 2017 - $13,581.49 Breakdown On Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002973 |
28/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$1,279,348.00 |
|
|
|
EFT Payment Run 2965 Incorrectly Cancelled After Transfer - Tax Payable As Of June 2017 BAS Return - Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$18,555,748.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK |
|||
|
00002954 |
12/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexpurchase 29.03.2017 - 28.04.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Library Services April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
ABC Shop - Bookstock |
$27.49 |
|
|
|
Amazon - Bookstock |
$190.73 |
|
|
|
Angus & Robertson Book - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$40.48 |
|
|
|
Atom - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$133.45 |
|
|
|
Big W - Bookstock & Printer Cartridges |
$260.45 |
|
|
|
Bookdepository.com - Bookstock & Resources - Museum In A Box |
$1,373.08 |
|
|
|
Booktopia Pty Ltd - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$331.63 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Card Table - Mahjong Club |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
City Of Perth - Parking Fees |
$41.11 |
|
|
|
Crayons - Kinetic Sand For IAAP |
$45.91 |
|
|
|
Educating Kids - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$51.64 |
|
|
|
Floraco - Flowers High Tea |
$248.05 |
|
|
|
Freedom Joondalup - Cushion For Chair - High Tea |
$11.89 |
|
|
|
Games World - Mah-Jong Set - Yanchep Library |
$109.99 |
|
|
|
Goodguys Joondalup - Vacuum Cleaner - Wanneroo Library |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Ikea Perth - Furniture - Yanchep Library & Ipad Stand - Alkimos |
$287.90 |
|
|
|
JB Ocean Keys - Cables - Docking Station - Alkimos & Bookstock |
$1,067.26 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Fridge, Bins - Alkimos Pop-Up Library, Containers & Bookstock |
$710.00 |
|
|
|
Mapworld - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$54.95 |
|
|
|
Myer Joondalup - Milk Jugs High Tea |
$34.82 |
|
|
|
A Taste Of The Matcham - Resources - Museum In A Box |
$31.60 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Attend Training Course & Bookstock |
$1,694.00 |
|
|
|
Red Dot Stores - Storage For Circulation Desk - Yanchep Library |
$16.00 |
|
|
|
Target - High Tea Napkins |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
The Big Bk Club Incorporated - Bookstock |
$92.70 |
|
|
|
Thingz Gifts - High Tea - Cake Stands |
$135.94 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Water - Yanchep Library. |
$59.75 |
|
|
|
Western Australian Genealogical Society Incorporated - Journal Subscription |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications & Events April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Cafe Elixir - Meeting |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Campaignmonitor.Co - E-Newsletters |
$430.74 |
|
|
|
Coles - Competition Winner |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Coles - In House Catering Requests |
$1,111.94 |
|
|
|
Conti Wines - Paul Conti's Wine - Gifts - Reward And Recognition Annual Function |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Facebook Advertising |
$948.57 |
|
|
|
Filecamp Ag - Photo Library |
$198.96 |
|
|
|
Flower Scentral - In House Catering Requests |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Imagazine Ag - Online Magazine Tool |
$13.25 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Items Needed For Barbagello Gala Dinner |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Kmart - In House Catering Requests |
$12.00 |
|
|
|
Paper-Pak - Gala Dinner Gift Bags |
$216.85 |
|
|
|
Step Two Designs - Intranet Showcase Report |
$185.90 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Bakery - In House Catering Requests |
$44.60 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - In House Catering Requests |
$488.93 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Supa IGA - In House Catering Requests |
$249.35 |
|
|
|
Wilsons Sign Solution - Plaque Reveal |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
|
www.cakefactory.com.au - In House Catering Requests |
$62.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Maintenance April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service - Latchguard |
$33.00 |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware - Hardware Purchases |
$1,591.47 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$4,163.23 |
|
|
|
Coles - Fraudulent Transaction |
$103.49 |
|
|
|
Freds Hardware - Rapid Set 20kg |
$95.40 |
|
|
|
Kennards Hire WA - Scissorlift Hire |
$303.00 |
|
|
|
Liquorland - Fraudulent Transaction |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
LTV Wangara - Hardware Purchases |
$24.17 |
|
|
|
McDonalds Warwick - Fraudulent Transaction |
$11.80 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Degree Nerro Chrome |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Safety World - Safety Boots Ladies |
$144.65 |
|
|
|
Valspar Malaga - Paint Supplies |
$1,826.09 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Fraudulent Transaction |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Services April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Big W - Craft Items |
$54.00 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Craft Items |
$68.02 |
|
|
|
Chippys Fish Cafe - Clients Meals |
$58.65 |
|
|
|
City Farmers - Items For Pet Bird & Fish - HACC Program |
$43.95 |
|
|
|
Coles - Lunch/Pantry Items - HACC |
$1,415.15 |
|
|
|
Gravity Discovery Centre - Social Support Outing 27.04.2017 |
$381.00 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Stationery |
$38.00 |
|
|
|
Lay Trading Pty Ltd - Members Meals |
$29.98 |
|
|
|
The Flying Fish - Lunch - HACC |
$216.50 |
|
|
|
Oceanlily Pty Ltd - Meals For Clients |
$165.63 |
|
|
|
Quinns Rocks Fresh IGA - Lunch/Pantry Items - HACC |
$110.51 |
|
|
|
Red Dot Stores - Easter And Pamper Products/Craft Items/Jars |
$84.93 |
|
|
|
Spotlight - Materials Purchase |
$185.64 |
|
|
|
Subway - Lunch - HACC |
$92.10 |
|
|
|
The House Of Honey - Devonshire Teas - 26.04.2017 Social Support Outing |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Toyworld Balcatta - HACC Activity |
$49.98 |
|
|
|
Two Buck Shop & More - HACC Activity |
$36.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Lunch/Pantry Items - HACC |
$1,162.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Youth Services April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases - Youth Programs |
$25.94 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Supplies - Youth Activities |
$534.21 |
|
|
|
Generation Next Australia - E Johnston - Conference Registration |
$199.00 |
|
|
|
Ikea Perth - Materials For Program |
$90.45 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Materials - Sports/Décor/Restock/School Holiday Programs |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Subway - Food For Lunches School Holiday Program |
$176.90 |
|
|
|
The Butcher Shop - Materials For School Holiday Program - Urban Art |
$241.09 |
|
|
|
The Pool Table Man - Replacement Cue Tips |
$5.00 |
|
|
|
Think Promotional - USB's For National Youth Week Event |
$708.65 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Supa IGA - Materials For Craft Project |
$4.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parks/Conservation April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware/Tool Purchases |
$320.47 |
|
|
|
Logmeininc.com - Pro For Small Business Yearly Subscription |
$946.28 |
|
|
|
Metro Hardware Pty Ltd - Tool Replacement |
$27.50 |
|
|
|
Permatech - Duragrout Two 20kg Bags For A Drainage Job |
$41.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various Service Units April 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Flower Scentral - Flowers - As Thank You For Reward And Recognition Arrangements - People & Culture |
$65.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 10 Mobile Phone Cases - IT |
$46.78 |
|
|
|
Coles - Dog Food & Hose Nozzle - Animal Care Centre |
$21.90 |
|
|
|
Repco - Truck Wash - Rangers |
$86.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Cat & Dog Food - Animal Care Centre |
$202.91 |
|
|
|
Dept Of Environment - Regulation – Clearing Regulation Neerabup Industrial Area - Economic Development |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Chocolate Drops - Purchase Of Goods From Local Business For Promotion To The Chinese Market - Economic Development |
$67.90 |
|
|
|
Conti Wines - Purchase Of Goods From Local Business For Promotion To The Chinese Market - Economic Development |
$216.00 |
|
|
|
CEDA - I Martinus - Outbound Investment - The Role For Economic Growth - Seminar |
$185.00 |
|
|
|
Battery World - Battery Chargers - Fleet |
$459.00 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Gas Bottle Exchange & Extension Leads - Fleet |
$132.69 |
|
|
|
City Truck & Trailer - Mud Flaps - Fleet |
$53.53 |
|
|
|
Commarine - Tank Level Alarm - Fleet |
$193.00 |
|
|
|
Dot - Licensing - New Plates To Replace Damaged Plate - Fleet |
$25.30 |
|
|
|
Eidis/Ceramabond - Dome Washers For Grid Clamps - Fleet |
$181.50 |
|
|
|
Hydraulic Hoist & Winch - Gasket Valve Cover - Fleet |
$52.80 |
|
|
|
Konnect Shop - Nyloc Nuts For Stock - Fleet |
$8.80 |
|
|
|
Motorcycle Studio - Wrong Credit Card Used At Time Of Purchase - Fleet |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Remote Control Technology - Electrical Parts - Fleet |
$24.70 |
|
|
|
Rexel Electrical Supplies - Electrical Parts - Fleet |
$63.58 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Wangara - Bearing Seal - Fleet |
$132.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchasing Cards Transactions |
$32,109.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EFT's And Purchasing Cards |
$18,587,858.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED PAYMENTS FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
|
105485 |
02.03.2016 |
The Travelling Trunk |
-$40.00 |
|
105480 |
02.03.2016 |
Jenna Robertson |
-$45.00 |
|
109201 |
04.04.2017 |
Ice Synchro WA |
-$500.00 |
|
104798 |
05.01.2016 |
Mindarie Playgroup |
-$50.00 |
|
104787 |
05.01.2016 |
Quinns Rocks Playgroup |
-$50.00 |
|
104799 |
05.01.2016 |
Mindarie Playgroup |
-$50.00 |
|
104820 |
05.01.2016 |
The Travelling Trunk |
-$52.00 |
|
104859 |
05.01.2016 |
Belridge Secondary College |
-$2,000.00 |
|
105554 |
09.03.2016 |
Neerabup Districts Junior Football Club |
-$84.00 |
|
109727 |
14.06.2017 |
Craig Knox |
-$100.00 |
|
104986 |
19.01.2016 |
G McNair |
-$22.50 |
|
105081 |
27.01.2016 |
Dawn Mills |
-$25.00 |
|
105074 |
27.01.2016 |
Mr John Royston Macgregor |
-$664.50 |
|
2932-11553 |
27.06.2017 |
Armed for Life |
-$2,640.00 |
|
109837 |
27.06.2017 |
Nellie Vatarl Music |
-$540.00 |
|
109859 |
27.06.2017 |
Rian Hronsky |
-$240.00 |
|
105707 |
29.03.2016 |
The Travelling Trunk |
-$64.00 |
|
105716 |
29.03.2016 |
Jamie Watson |
-$42.50 |
|
109783 |
20.06.2017 |
Jacqueline Mary Perry |
-$360.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cancelled Payments |
-$7,569.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 7 |
|
|
|
|
Nastech Pty Ltd - Planning Service Fee - Lot 38 Windsor Road Wangara |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TPS |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANUAL JOURNAL |
|||
|
8100/2017 |
30/06/2017 |
Accrual of Flexi Purchase June 2017 |
$39,428.04 |
|
8099/2017 |
30/06/2017 |
Accrual of Flexi Purchase June 2017 |
$33,483.28 |
|
8098/2017 |
30/06/2017 |
Reverse Accrual of Flexi Purchase April 2017 |
-$22,067.86 |
|
8097/2017 |
30/06/2017 |
Reverse Accrual of Flexi Purchase May 2017 |
-$30,634.14 |
|
8055/2017 |
30/06/2017 |
Lodgement Fee registering 40 unpaid infringements |
$2,320.00 |
|
8182/2018 |
28/07/2017 |
Lodgement Fee for registering 50 unpaid infringement |
$2,950.00 |
|
8182/2018 |
28/07/2017 |
Lodgement Fee for registering 23 unpaid infringement |
$1,334.00 |
|
8182/2018 |
28/07/2017 |
Superannuation Clearing funds June 2017 |
-$1,052,578.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Journals |
-$1,025,765.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL FUND BANK ACCOUNT |
|||
|
|
|
Payroll Payments - July 2017 |
|
|
|
|
04.07.2017 |
$1,798,749.68 |
|
|
|
18.07.2017 |
$1,781,506.07 |
|
|
|
24.07.2017 |
$309.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Payroll |
$3,580,564.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002953 |
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation June 2017 |
|
|
|
|
D Simms |
|
|
|
|
Accommodation - Attending Australian Reporting Awards In Melbourne - 21.06.2017 |
$239.84 |
|
|
|
Accommodation - Attending Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly In Canberra - 18 - 21.06.2017 |
$958.16 |
|
|
|
Accommodation - LG Professionals Congress In Hobart - D Simms - 21 To 28 May 2017 |
$1,030.20 |
|
|
|
Accommodation - LG Professionals Congress In Hobart- R Driver - 21 To 28 May 2017 |
$1,050.40 |
|
|
|
Airfare - D Simms - Attending Awards Presentation Dinner In Melbourne 21.06. 2017 |
$300.01 |
|
|
|
Meal Expenses - Attending Australian Reporting Awards In Melbourne - 21.06.2017 |
$35.00 |
|
|
|
Meal Expense - Attending Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly In Canberra - 19.06.2017 |
$8.00 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Attending Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly In Canberra - 19.06.2017 |
$43.40 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Breakfast Meeting To Discuss Possible Yanchep Rail Line -26 Apr 2017 |
$37.50 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Breakfast Meeting With John Quigley MLA - 09.06.2017 |
$61.75 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - CEO And DCSP Viewing Of Walk Route For Governor Of WA Visit - 27.04.2017 |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Coffees Prior To MRC Meeting - 18.05.2017 |
$25.50 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - LG Professionals Congress In Hobart - 21 May 2017 - D. Simms paid for group dinner to be invoiced and reimbursed |
$969.75 |
|
|
|
Cab Charge - Attending Australian Reporting Awards In Melbourne - 21.06.2017 |
$59.43 |
|
|
|
Cab Charges - Attending Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly In Canberra - 19.06.2017 |
$105.25 |
|
|
|
Meal Expense - Attending Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly In Canberra |
$18.50 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$37.66 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of Protective Clothing For D. Simms |
$162.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Awards Presentation Dinner In Melbourne 21.06.2017 |
$245.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee LG Professionals Congress |
$2.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Terelinck |
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Refrigerator - Alexander Heights Day Centre |
$816.00 |
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Meeting With DFES |
$144.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Singh |
|
|
|
|
Registration Fee - S Erdmann - White Card Course |
$39.00 |
|
|
|
Department Of Environment - Clearing Application Fee |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Registration Fee - M Berenji - White Card Course And Wallet Sized White Card Certificate |
$1.75 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - M Berenji - White Card Course And Wallet Sized White Card Certificate |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - B McCawley- State NRM And Coastal Conference 2017 |
$566.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Dickson |
|
|
|
|
Business Hospitality - Shore Café - 02 June 2017 |
$57.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$21.08 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of Stationary At Officeworks |
$96.12 |
|
|
|
Master Card Fee - Registration Fee - Conference - Land Development |
$104.72 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Conference - Land Development |
$3,740.00 |
|
|
|
Search Fee - Australian Securities And Investment Commission - Walshday Pty Ltd |
$19.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Jennings |
|
|
|
|
Accommodation - N Jennings Attending Conference In Melbourne 21 - 22.06.2017 |
$607.26 |
|
|
|
Airfare - Corporate Traveller Virgin Australia - N Jennings - Attending Conference In Melbourne |
$599.40 |
|
|
|
Application For Clearing Permit - Public Access way - Nott Place Yanchep |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Interstate Emergency Medical Expense for City traveller to be reimbursed to the City |
$280.00 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of Batteries From Battery World |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - 2017 Achievement Awards - 30.06.2017 - 3 X Attendees |
$445.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - M Penson - Rics Oceania Training |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Australasian Annual Reporting Awards In Melbourne |
$2,075.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Yildiz |
|
|
|
|
Accommodation - LG Professionals Congress In Hobart - Mayor Roberts - 21 - 28.05.2017 |
$1,058.98 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - N Raniga - Chartered Accountants Australia And New Zealand |
$680.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Attending Australasian Reporting Awards - Mayor Roberts |
$245.00 |
|
|
|
Purchase Of USB 16gb For The Land Discovery At Office Works |
$59.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Cards |
$17,871.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002972 |
27/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation July 2017 - Bank Fees |
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$205.48 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$5,707.53 |
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee |
$263.88 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fees Debtors |
$152.61 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fees Rates |
$6,406.62 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Fees Debtors |
$44.11 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Fees Rates |
$179.09 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$329.34 |
|
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$292.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees |
$13,581.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees And Credit Cards |
$31,453.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup July 2017 |
$17,879,914.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$17,911,368.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$21,491,933.21 |
Property Services
CS03-08/17 Proposed Deed of Variation to Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) over a portion of Lot 555, Crown Reserve 28058, Madeley
File Ref: 5297 – 17/207106
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Previous Items: CB02-10/13 - Proposed Lease to Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) over a portion of Lot 555 Crown Reserve 28058, Madeley. - Ordinary Council - 15 Oct 2013 7.00pm
CP05-06/16 - Provision of Transportable Buildings at Active Reserves within the City of Wanneroo - Ordinary Council - 28 Jun 2016 6.00pm
Issue
To consider entering into a Deed of Variation of Lease with the Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) (WCSC) over a portion of Lot 555, Crown Reserve 28058, Kingsway, Madeley to facilitate the provision of two transportable buildings.
Background
Land
The WCSC is a Not For Profit (NFP) entity that currently leases a portion of Crown Reserve 28058, portion of Lot 555 (100) Kingsway, Madeley (Lot 555) being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title LR3158 Folio 501 (Attachment 1 refers) and otherwise known as the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex.
Lot 555 is a category “C” reserve vested in the City for “Recreation” purposes under a Management Order with power to lease for any term not exceeding 21 years, subject to the consent of the Minister for Lands.
Lot 555 is currently zoned “Parks & Recreation” under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and “Regional Parks & Recreation” in the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2.
Lease
Council, at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 18 October 2013 (CB02-10/13) resolved:
1. APPROVES the Lease of a portion of Lot 555, Crown Reserve 28058, Kingsway, Madeley as shown in Attachment 1 to the Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) for a term of five (5) years commencing 1 November 2013, in accordance with the City's Tenancy Policy for a 'Not-for-Profit' organisation and subject to the Minister for Lands approval; and
2. AUTHORISES the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a Lease between the Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy.
The five (5) year Lease, negotiated under the City’s Tenancy Policy at that time, commenced 1 November 2013 and is scheduled to expire 31 October 2018. The annual lease fee is $1 (peppercorn) per annum and the WCSC is responsible for cleaning, repairs, maintenance, rates and taxes and all outgoings associated with the facility. The City is responsible for the structural maintenance of the leased premises.
Provision of Transportable Buildings
Due to the growth in WCSC membership numbers (in women’s teams in particular), it was determined by Administration in 2016 that there was a requirement for additional change room facilities to be provided for WCSC use. The change room configuration of the leased clubroom was deemed insufficient to meet the WCSC’s current and future needs as both change rooms were required to be used by both male and female teams and officials.
Council, at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 28 June 2016 (CP05-06/16) resolved:
“That Council:-
1. NOTES Administration’s identified project priorities (in no particular order) in respect to the purchase of transportable buildings to support current activities at the following Active Reserves in the short to medium term, until such time as permanent facility solutions are in place or a change in need occurs:
a. Leatherback Park, Alkimos;
b. Amberton District Public Open Space; and
c. Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex – Wanneroo City Soccer Club.
2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure listed in the following table, pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 for the Provision of Transportable Buildings at Active Reserves within the City of Wanneroo:
|
Description |
GL Account/ Capital Project |
Current Budget |
Adjusted Budget |
|
Provision of Transportable Buildings at Active Reserves within the City of Wanneroo |
PR-TBA |
$0 |
$295, 000 |
3. APPROVES the following budget amendment to address the project funding shortfall for the Provision of Transportable Buildings at Active Reserves within the City of Wanneroo, noting that a new Project Number will be created upon Council endorsement;
|
Project Number |
From |
To |
Description |
|
Reserve |
$295,000 |
|
Strategic Projects/Initiatives Reserve |
|
PR- TBA |
|
$295,000 |
Provision of Transportable Buildings at Active Reserves within the City of Wanneroo |
4. NOTES that Administration will be undertaking a Request For Quotation process for the purchase of transportable buildings to support the current activities at the City of Wanneroo Active Reserves identified within item 2 above.”
Accordingly, two transportable change rooms were purchased by the City and located at the southern end of the clubroom for the WCSC’s use in December 2016. As a result, the existing leased sea container was relocated from its previous location and now abuts the free standing leased colorbond storage shed (Attachment 2 refers).
Detail
The installation of the two transportable change rooms by the City on a portion of Lot 555 for exclusive use by the WCSC has varied the area of the original leased premises. The sea container and the two transportable change rooms are located outside of the existing leased area.
Accordingly, a Deed of Variation (Deed) is required to document the change and clarify the amended leased area. In addition, Administration will vary the Lease to document the change in the City’s public liability insurance (PLI) requirements from $10 million to $20 million minimum.
The WCSC has agreed in writing to vary the existing Lease by way of a Deed to include the portion of un-leased land into the leased premises and also increase its PLI requirements. As the two transportable change rooms together with the pre-existing sea container have been located outside of the original leased area, the Deed will require approval from the Minister for Lands.
The essential terms of the draft Deed as agreed with the WCSC are as follows, subject to Council and the Ministerial approval:
|
Lease Premises: |
Portion of Lot 555, Crown Reserve 28058 (100) Madeley as hachured on the plan (Attachment 2 refers) |
|
Lease Term: |
The balance of the term of the Lease dated 5 November 2013 that commenced 1 November 2013, expiring 31 October 2018 |
|
Public Liability Insurance: |
$20 million minimum |
|
Maintenance of Transportable Change Room: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Structural Maintenance of Transportable Change Room: |
Lessor responsibility |
All other terms of the undated lease and Deed of Variation of lease dated 16 April 2013 remain unchanged as follows:
|
Commencement Date: |
5 November 2013 |
|
Lease Rental: |
$1 (peppercorn) per annum |
|
Permitted Purpose: |
Clubrooms and Storage and uses reasonably ancillary thereto |
|
Rates, Taxes and Outgoings: |
The Lessee is responsible for all rates, taxes, assessments, impositions and outgoings for water, electricity, gas and telephone/broadband used in relation to the premises whether billed directly or otherwise. |
|
Emergency Services Levy: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Building Insurance: |
Lessor insures and on charges the Lessee the building insurance premium |
|
Other Insurance (including contents, public liability et cetera): |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Maintenance of Premises and Cleaning: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Structural Maintenance: |
Lessor responsibility |
|
Statutory Compliance: |
Lessee responsibility |
Consultation
· The essential terms of the proposed Deed have been prepared in consultation with the WCSC; and
· Section 18 of the Land Administration Act 1997 requires the City to obtain consent to the Deed from State Land Services at the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) on behalf of the Minister for Lands. DPLH have reviewed the Deed and advised the City that the Ministers approval is granted.
Comment
The Deed is required to include the portion of un-leased land into the leased premises in accordance with Council’s Resolution at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 28 June 2016 (CP05-06/16). In addition, Administration will also vary the Lease to increase the WCSC PLI policy requirement from $10 million to $20 million.
The Transportable change room works cost $34,055 (approximate). In accordance with Building Regulation 2012, building work that is valued less than $50,000 and commenced construction prior to 30 June 2017 does not require formal building approval.
Statutory Compliance
The proposed Deed is considered an exempt disposition under Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 as it is a sporting entity.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
Policy Implications
The Deed will vary the existing Lease that was negotiated under the terms of the City’s defunct Tenancy Policy.
The existing Lease and proposed new Deed will expire 31 October 2018. Lease negotiations for a new agreement under the terms of the City’s Leasing Policy will commence with the WCSC in 2018.
Financial Implications
The Transportable change room works cost $34,055 (approximate) previously approved by Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 28 June 2016 (CP05-06/16).
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the variation of the existing Lease to the Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) to incorporate an additional portion of Crown Reserve 28058, Lot 555 (100) Kingsway, Madeley (Attachment 2 refers) into the leased premises on execution of the Deed by all parties for the remainder of the term of the Lease, subject to the Minister for Lands approval and
2. AUTHORISES the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a Deed of Variation of Lease between the City and the Wanneroo City Soccer Club (Inc.) in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Existing Leased Area |
12/59444 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Proposed New Lease Area |
17/89737 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 484
CS04-08/17 Proposed excision and purchase of a 326m2 portion of Crown Reserve 39479, John Moloney Park, Lot 107736 (34) Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo
File Ref: 6157 – 17/254906
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the proposed excision and purchase of a 326m2 portion of Crown Reserve 39479, John Moloney Park, Lot 10776 (34) Highclere Blvd, Marangaroo.
Background
Lot 10776
John Maloney Park (Lot 10776) is located on Crown Reserve 39479, (34) Highclere Blvd, Marangaroo being the whole of the land contained in Certificate of Title Volume LR3049 Folio 257 and vested in the City for “Public Recreation” purposes under a Management Order with no power to lease.
Lot 10776 is 6.8601ha in area and currently zoned as "Urban" under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and "Parks & Recreation" in the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2).
There is an easement (Landgate reference F228551) registered 25 June 1993 on Lot 10776's Certificate of Title to the Water Corporation of Western Australia (Water Corp) detailing the Water Corp's sewer pressure main pipeline infrastructure on 25 June 1993. A portion of the Water Corp’s infrastructure abuts the south-eastern boundary of neighbouring Lot 825.
Lot 825
Located due north-west of Lot 10776 is City freehold Lot 825, (46) Highclere Blvd, Marangaroo being the whole of the land contained in Certificate of Title Volume 1694 Folio 466.
Lot 825 is 2000m2 in area and currently zoned as "Urban" under the MRS and "Civic and Cultural" in the DPS 2.
There is a dedicated purpose built brick and colorbond family centre building located on Lot 825 known as the Marangaroo Family Centre (Centre). In addition, Lot 825 contains a car park, assorted playground equipment and two wooden pergolas constructed on a rear brick patio area.
Lease
The City currently leases Lot 825 (Attachment 1 refers) to the Department of Communities (DOC) at a nominal rental of $1 peppercorn per annum for the purpose of a family centre. The Centre was constructed by the DOC and a 21-year Lease between the City and the DOC commenced on 12 March 1991, expiring 11 March 2012.
In 1997, the original Centre was demolished as a result of a fire. It was subsequently reconstructed by the DOC in 1998. The Lease was not amended at that time, as there was still a further fourteen (14) years to run on the term.
The Lease is currently held over with the DOC being a monthly tenant on the same terms and conditions of the expired Lease. The DOC fully maintains all aspects of the leased premises, including the structural component. The City does not maintain the land or the Centre which comprises Lot 825.
Department of Communities
The DOC advised the City on 27 June 2016 of the State Government’s decision to cease leasing property for the purpose of providing subsidised accommodation to community groups and childcare providers as of 30 June 2018. Accordingly, the DOC will withdraw from leasing and maintaining the Centre on 30 June 2018 and has advised the City that it supports the City entering into a direct Lease agreement with the MFC who currently administers the Centre. Ownership of the building also needs to be clarified.
The Centre
The Centre is operated by a special purpose not-for-profit incorporated community group, the Marangaroo Family Centre Incorporated (MFC) under a funded service agreement with the DOC. The MFC provides low cost child and community programs and services to families in the southern suburbs of the City.
The Centre is open seven days a week and offers children's programs from birth to five years of age. These range from playgroups to a pre-kindergarten programme. The Centre also offers the following services:
· parenting workshops facilitated by NGALA;
· Child Health Nurse who is funded by Child and Adolescent Health Service;
· Disability services administration; and
· Autism West runs social group and meets families.
The MFC is now in its final financial year of both its current occupancy agreement and its community funding arrangement with the DOC, both of which were scheduled to expire 30 June 2018. The DOC has recently agreed to extend the MFC’s community funding for a further three (3) months until 30 September 2018 but the accommodation support will cease as of 30 June 2018.
It is the MFC’s intention to enter into a direct Lease with the City in 2018 to allow it to continue occupancy of the Centre to delivery its community programs. Administration is currently working with the MFC to assist with its tender application for future funding for its Supporting Communities Program and canvassing the DOC to explore the feasibility in extending its accommodation support to the MFC for a further three (3) months until 30 September 2018 (primarily should the encroachment issue not be resolved prior to 30 June 2018).
Encroachment
The DOC has encroached onto the north-western portion of Lot 10776. The boundary of Lot 825 has been extended resulting in an area of Lot 10776 being fenced off, a colorbond shed installed and a playground constructed. Research by Administration indicates that this situation has existed since the Centre was established by the DOC prior to 1991. Correspondence from the Town Clerk to the Director General DOC in 1998 stated:
"The City proposes developing the adjacent recreation reserve more or less according to the attached draft concept plan for Highclere Park and you will note that a car park will encroach into the south-western part of Lot 825. To compensate for this, additional land adjacent to the south-eastern boundary of Lot 825 will be included in the lease area for playgrounds".
Whilst it is apparent that the encroachment onto Lot 10776 was undertaken with the knowledge and approval of the City, the Lease was not varied to reflect the comments made
by the Town Clerk at that time and it appears that the Minister for Lands was not consulted over the fence realignment.
The Centre currently encroaches onto a 326m2 area (Excision Area) of Lot 10776 (Attachment 2 refers) that has been fenced off without any formal Council and Ministerial consent. The DOC therefore has exclusive use of a portion of public recreation reserve, prohibiting access to the public.
The Water Corporation (Water Corp) has advised Administration that it supports a boundary re-alignment based on the following points being adhered to in respect of the easement:
· that no permanent brick built building is constructed over the area of the easement where the weight would/could damage its infrastructure;
· that the current playground equipment that is constructed over the easement is acceptable; and
· that the current easement be transferred to the new Certificate of Title once the proposed excision and purchase has settled.
Proposal
In order to rectify the current land anomaly, Administration proposes that the City will purchase the Excision Area from the Minister for Lands and incorporated the land into City freehold Lot 825 (Attachment 3 refers).
Detail
Scheme Amendment
In order to effect the proposal, the zoning of the Excision Area is required to be consolidated. A formal Amendment to DPS 2 is required to rezone the Excision Area from a "Local Scheme Reserve – Parks and Recreation" to "Civic and Cultural". An MRS Amendment is not required.
A DPS 2 Amendment requires two written reports to be presented to Council:
· An initial report for Council to consider the initiation of the Scheme Amendment (on the same Council Agenda as this report); and
· A future report to consider adopting the Amendment.
The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) will have an extensive role as part of the DPS 2 Amendment process. To effect the proposed rezoning, consent is required from the DPLH to advertise the Amendment proposal should Council resolve to initiate the Amendment. Further, should Council Adopt the Amendment (following advertising), the DPLH would be required to consider the Amendment prior to the Minister for Planning’s final certification.
Following rezoning, a formal application will be made to the DPLH to excise the Excision Area and the City’s purchase of the freehold land to facilitate the inclusion of the Excision Area into Lot 825.
Administration has appointed its preferred surveyor (Land Division) to create the necessary Deposited Plan required to be lodged at Landgate.
Costs
· The DPLH has advised Administration that the cost to acquire the Excision Area will be at 5% of the Current Unimproved Market Value (CUMV). The indicative CUMV is $65,200 (plus GST) (approximate). The City is waiting on the Minister for Lands to confirm the actual CUMV in writing;
· The DPLH has advised Administration that the indicative 5% CUMV is $3,260 (plus GST) (approximate) plus any other associated costs (i.e. document preparation, lodgement at Landgate and survey instructions). The City is waiting on the Minister for Lands to confirm the actual 5% purchase price in writing;
· The DPLH advised Administration in writing on 17 May 2013 that consideration would be given to dispose of the Excision Area at 5% of the CUMV providing that the City places the difference (between the 5% purchase price and the CUMV of the land), in a trust fund. It is therefore proposed that the City purchases the Excision Area for the indicative $3,260 (plus GST) (approximate) with the commitment that the balance of the indicative $61,940 (plus GST) will be placed in a trust account for the monies to be applied to capital improvements to other recreation reserves in the general locality; and
· Administration advised the DPLH in writing on 1 June 2017 that Administration agrees to purchase the Excision Area at 5% CUMV, subject to Council approval.
Recommendation
Administration recommends that the City purchase the Excision Area at 5% CUMV. The essential terms proposed are as follows:
1. The City purchases the Excision Area of Lot 10776 at the value determined by Landgate Valuation Services, which will be subject to:
a) The City’s successful application for rezoning; and
b) The City’s successful application for the Excision Area of 326m2 of Lot 10776 and purchase of the freehold from the DPLH.
Consultation
· The DPLH (on behalf of the Minister for Lands) provided in principle support in writing on 31 May 2017 in regards the City’s proposed purchase of the Excision Area at 5% CUMV;
· The City is awaiting the DPLH to confirm actual definitive costs to purchase the Excision Area and the actual monies to be placed in a trust fund for capital improvements. All figures provided by DPLH to-date are approximate;
· Public consultation is required for the cancellation of the DPLH Guidelines for the disposal of Section 152 reserves which can be satisfied by the advertising of the proposed Scheme Amendment;
· The Scheme Amendment will require public consultation for 42 days in accordance with the Town Planning Regulations 1967 and includes, on-site advertising, advertisements in the local paper and on the City’s website and referral in writing to affected persons and relevant agencies;
· Public consultation of 35 days is also required in relation to the cancellation and the excision of the 326m2 portion of Lot 10776. The advertising required for the Scheme Amendment can run simultaneously with the advertising required for the excision of the reserve (both to be detailed in the same Public Notice). It is considered that this process will provide an appropriate level of community consultation to confirm support for the proposal.
· The DPLH (formerly Department of Planning) advised Administration in writing on 26 April 2013 that from a property management perspective, it has no objection to the proposed excision. It further advised in writing on 24 May 2013 that from a statutory planning perspective it had no objections to the proposal;
· The DOC and MFC support the proposal and have been advised by Administration that a new Lease cannot be entered into on Lot 825 until the current land anomaly is rectified; and
· Administration is aware that the resultant trust monies will be utilised for capital improvements in the general locality of Lot 10776. Under Crown land DPLH Guidelines for the disposal of Section 152 reserves, the City must apply the trust monies to other recreation reserves in the general locality. The trust fund must be established to show how the proceeds of sale have been applied.
Comment
Given the overall size (6.8601ha) of Lot 10776 and the quantity of public open spaces within neighbouring Girrawheen and Koondoola, Administration considers it acceptable to purchase the proposed Excision Area and incorporate it into Lot 825. The public has not had the benefit of the Excision Area post-1991 and as Lot 10776 is a Section 152 reserve (S20A) public recreation reserve the City does not have the option to Lease the occupied Excision Area to the MFC.
The Centre was constructed and is fully maintained by the DOC at no cost to the City. The building will revert back to the City to maintain on 1 July 2018 when the DOC withdraws from its current tenancy arrangement with the City. The City will therefore assume ownership of the Centre as of 1 July 2018.
Historically, the DOC has continually advised the City that it would not remove its playground infrastructure from the Excision Area and realign the fence line to the correct boundary alignment of Lot 825. It previously notified the City that it would close the Centre should it be formerly be requested to operate purely within the existing boundary parameters of Lot 825 claiming that the Centre cannot operate successfully without a sufficient play area for its users.
The proposed Excision Area is a long standing historical land anomaly. The DOC’s decision to withdraw its funding to the MFC and its tenancy arrangement with the City requires the land anomaly to be expedited to facilitate long term planning by both the MFC and the City. Continued uncertainty in regards to future funding and tenancy arrangements is now impacting on the MFC’s program delivery and staff planning and retention as it is unable to effectively plan for post 30 June 2018. Purchasing the Excision Area for inclusion into Lot 825 is required as the loss of the community services that the Centre currently provides would be detrimental to the Marangaroo and surrounding suburbs.
Based on the above factors, Administration supports the proposed Excision Area for incorporation into City freehold Lot 825:
· the portion of Lot 10776 behind the proposed Excision Area is not actively used and is fact separated from the balance of the reserve by a dissecting pedestrian pathway;
· the proposed Excision Area has not extended the outside area of Lot 825 on the northern boundary and therefore has no impact on neighbouring residential properties;
· the current land anomaly appears to have been in place circa -1991;
· it appears from historical records that the City had previously intended to formalise the arrangement in the Lease that is currently held over. However, this did not occur;
· following acquisition of the Excision Area, Administration and the MFC will be in a position to negotiate a new Lease that provides the City with adequate insurance and indemnity provisions.
Any future development or sale of an enlarged Lot 825 following amalgamation with the Excision Area is unlikely due to the following reasons:
· the civic and cultural zoning of Lot 825 under DPS2 is not conducive to commercial enterprise;
· the objective of the civic and cultural zoning is to make provision for public facilities;
· Lot 825 will be encumbered by a Water Corp easement. The Water Corp has advised that its infrastructure is unable to be built over with a permanent brick built structure.
The current land anomaly places the City in breach of the terms of its Management Order for Lot 10776. There is also the potential for insurance implications due to the status of the Encroachment Area.
Rectification of the long standing land anomaly will facilitate the on-going operation of the Centre and enable Lease negotiations to commence in due course over a portion of the proposed re-configured area of Lot 825.
Note that the City is still awaiting the DPLH to confirm actual definitive costs to purchase the Excision Area and the actual monies to be placed in a trust fund for capital improvements. All figures provided by DPLH to-date are approximate.
Statutory Compliance
The purchase of the Excision Area will be subject to Section 86 of the Land Administration Act 1997 and Crown land DPLH Guidelines for the disposal of Section 152 reserves.
The proposed purchase of the Excision Area will be subject to Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.1 Build effective partnerships and demonstrate leadership in local government at regional, state and national levels”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Leadership Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O03 Land Development |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Leadership Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
· The DPLH has advised Administration that the cost to acquire the Excision Area will be at 5% of the CUMV. The indicative CUMV is $65,200 (plus GST) (approximate). The City is waiting on the Minister for Lands to confirm the actual CUMV in writing;
· The DPLH has advised Administration that the indicative 5% CUMV is $3,260 (plus GST) (approximate) plus any other associated costs (i.e. document preparation, lodgement at Landgate and survey instructions). The City is waiting on the Minister for Lands to confirm the actual 5% purchase price in writing;
· A Survey of the Excision Area has already been prepared at a cost of $2,524 (plus GST);
· Administration has budgeted $5,000 (plus GST) for additional DPLH costs such as document preparation, Landgate searches and lodgement and any additional survey modification instructions;
· The DPLH advised Administration in writing on 17 May 2013 that consideration would be given to dispose of the Excision Area at 5% of the CUMV providing that the City places the difference (between the 5% purchase price and the CUMV of the land), in a trust fund. It is therefore proposed that the City purchases the Excision Area for the indicative $3,260 (plus GST) (approximate) with the commitment that the balance of the indicative $61,940 (plus GST) will be placed in a trust account for the monies to be applied to capital improvements to other recreation reserves in the general locality; and
· The City will be responsible to meet the costs for the publication of public notices in local newspapers for the required Scheme Amendment and sign posting the Excision Area to indicate its intended change of use – estimated cost $5,000 (plus GST).
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES and AUTHORISES the excision and purchase of a 326m2 portion of Crown Reserve 39479, John Moloney Park, Lot 10776 (34) Highclere Bvd, Marangaroo (Excision Area) (Attachment 2 refers) at 5% of the current unimproved market value (plus GST) determined by Landgate Valuation Services for amalgamation into abutting City of Wanneroo freehold Lot 825, (46) Highclere Blvd, Marangaroo (Lot 825);
2. NOTES the expenditure of an indicative $3,260 (plus GST) (approximate) to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage for the purchase of the Excision Area at 5% of the current unimproved market value determined by Landgate Valuation Services, the transfer of an indicative $61,940 (plus GST) (approximate) to the Section 152 Reserve and the expenditure of $10,000 (plus GST) (approximate) from Administrations operational budget for advertising, survey, Landgate and document preparation costs;
3. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the unbudgeted expenditure of an indicative $61,940 (plus GST) (approximate) pursuant to Section 6.81(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 to be funded from the Strategic Projects/Initiatives Reserve
|
From |
To |
Description |
|
61,940 (plus GST) |
|
Strategic Projects/Initiatives Reserve |
|
|
61,940 (plus GST) |
Transfer to the Section 152 Reserve |
4. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo and execute any required Landgate forms to facilitate the transfer of the Water Corporations registered Easement F228551 on the Excision Area to Lot 825;
5. NOTES a further report will be presented to Council with any submissions to the advertisements for the rezoning, excision and purchase of the Excision Area; and
6. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to any required legal documentation required by the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage to facilitate the proposed excision and purchase of the Excision Area.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1: Existing Lease Area |
15/75239 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2: Existing Lease & Proposed Excision Area |
17/240241 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3: Proposed New Lease Area for purchase and amalgamation of Excision Area |
17/240243 |
|
Council & Corporate Support
File Ref: 2855V02 – 17/251216
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received five sponsorship requests, one community donation request and one request for a waiver of fees and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Council Support upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Tenpin Bowling WA |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Luke Daniels, Veronica Joseph and Bradey Van Opijnen |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Disability |
|
Event Details |
Tenpin Bowling Australia Disability Nationals, Sydney NSW, 7 – 17 June 2017 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200.00 per individual (capped at $600 per team to a maximum of four teams per event). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Tenpin Bowling WA for the participation of Luke Daniels, Veronica Joseph and Bradey Van Opijnen at the Tenpin Bowling Australia Disability Nationals held in Sydney NSW from 7 – 17 June 2017. |
|
Reason |
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
|
Applicant 2 – Joondalup Brothers Rugby Union Football Club |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Deekan O’Connell, Ethan Squire, Dane Luitingh, Joshua Bedworth, Kalani Small, Jesse King, Francois Bequidenhout, Jacob Botha and Ewan Cairns |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
Under 15s Rugby Tour, Singapore, 8 – 9 October 2017 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
International |
|
Comments |
In accordance with the Policy, $500 per individual (capped at $1,500 per team). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,500.00 to Joondalup Brothers Rugby Union Football Club for the participation of Deekan O’Connell, Ethan Squire, Dane Luitingh, Joshua Bedworth, Kalani Small, Jesse King, Francois Bequidenhout, Jacob Botha and Ewan Cairns at the Under 15s Rugby Tour to be held in Singapore from 8 -9 October 2017. |
|
Reason |
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
|
Applicant 3 – Black Swan Taekwondo |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Stefan Vojnovic, Daniel Vojnovic and Nikolas Vojnovic |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
CK Malaysian Open Championships, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 4 – 6 August 2017 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
International |
|
Comments |
In accordance with the Policy, $500 per individual (capped at $1,500 per team). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,500.00 to Black Swan Taekwondo for the participation of Stefan Vojnovic, Daniel Vojnovic and Nikolas Vojnovic at the CK Malaysian Open Championships held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from 4 – 6 August 2017. |
|
Reason |
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
|
Applicant 4 – Goju-Kai Sports Inc |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Nino Karow and Ethan Tran |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
7th Karate-do Goju-kai Global Championships, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada 28 September to 1 October 2017 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
International |
|
Comments |
In accordance with the Policy, $500 per individual (capped at $1,500 per team). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to Goju-Kai Sports Inc for the participation of Nino Karow and Ethan Tran at the 7th Karate-do Goju-kai Global Championships to be held in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada from 28 September to 1 October 2017. |
|
Reason |
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
|
Applicant 5 – School Sport Western Australia Inc |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Boys Team – Jackson Anderson, Owen Brown, Dylan McCulloch, Joe Quirk, Jacob Smith and Brayden Smith Girls Team – Charlotte Collier, Charlotte Ericksen, Tiana Forrestal and Hannah Slvic |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
School Sport Australia Swimming National Championship, Adelaide SA, 2 – 10 December 2017 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National |
|
Comments |
As per the policy $200.00 per individual (capped at $600 per team to a maximum of four teams per event). |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,200.00 to School Sport Western Australia Inc for the participation of Boys Team – Jackson Anderson, Owen Brown, Dylan McCulloch, Joe Quirk, Jacob Smith and Brayden Smith and Girls Team – Charlotte Collier, Charlotte Ericksen, Tiana Forrestal and Hannah Slvic at the School Sport Australia Swimming National Championship to be held in Adelaide SA from 2 – 10 December 2017. |
|
Reason |
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
Community Group Donations
|
Applicant 4 – Badminton Association of Western Australia |
|
|
Request amount |
$2,730.55 |
|
Description of request |
50% waiver of fees for hire of the Kingsway Indoor Stadium for the 2017 Val Nesbitt Trophy and U15 National Championships from 24 – 29 September 2017 |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Entry is free but teams are charged $612 per team. |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
Not for profit |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to all |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Objective 1.1 – Healthy and active people – Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
$24,800.00 |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
$8,000.00 plus $16,000 in kind contribution |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Through Community Funding rounds – CD05-06/02 $2,500.00 CD01-12/09 $1,500.00 CD03-05/11 $1,500.00 CD03-11/11 $1,000.00 CD02-05/12 $1,400.00 CD03-04/13 $642.50 CD05-05/14 $500.00 Through Council CS03-07/14 Nil |
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Comments |
Clause 2.7 of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy outlines that "requests that have the potential for income generation or profit or where an entry fee is being charged (excluding a gold coin donation)" are excluded. Whilst entry to watch the event is free, the group are charging teams $612.00 to participate. There will be 8 teams competing and the organisation have stated that “any surplus gained from the event will be channelled back into junior badminton and badminton activities in general in Western Australia” |
|
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a request for a donation for 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $2,730.55 to the Badminton Association of Western Australia for hire of the Kingsway Indoor Stadium for the 2017 Val Nesbitt Trophy and U15 National Championships from 24 – 29 September 2017. |
|
Reason |
The request does not satisfy the criteria of the policy. |
|
Applicant 5 – One Big Voice Festival Incorporated |
|
|
Request amount |
$1,884.30 |
|
Description of request |
Donation to cover the event insurance for the One Big Voice Concert at Perth Arena on 18 August 2017. |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Tickets to the event are $33.00. Approximately 6,000 tickets will be sold. |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
Not for profit |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to 79 schools, 16 of which are in the City of Wanneroo, and their families. |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Objective 1.1 – Healthy and active people – Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
$11,600.00 |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
$317,000.00 plus $2,000 hours volunteered and $1,400 goods donated |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
CD01-05/15 $1,186.35 (community funding)
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Comments |
Clause 2.7 of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy outlines that "requests that have the potential for income generation or profit or where an entry fee is being charged (excluding a gold coin donation)" are excluded. The group is charging $33.00 per ticket with an expected attendance of approximately 6,000. If all 6,000 tickets were sold at $33.00 per ticket, this would generate an income of $198,000.
The donation is to cover insurance for the event from Aon Risk Services Australia Limited $322.30 and Marsh Advantage Insurance $1,562.00.
This festival is for choirs from 79 schools throughout Perth, 16 of which are in the City of Wanneroo, including approximately 760 students out of a total of 3,800 students (27%). The proceeds from the income generated by this event is for the development of music program for schools in 2018. |
|
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a request for a donation in the sum of $1,884.30 to the One Big Voice Festival Incorporated to cover the event insurance for the One Big Voice Concert at Perth Arena on 18 August 2017. |
|
Reason |
The request does not satisfy the criteria of the policy. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four teams) and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2017/2018 |
|
$100 000.00 |
|
Amount expended to date (as at 04.08.17) |
|
$24,593.76 |
|
Balance |
|
$75,406.24 |
|
Total of requests for this round: Donations (in this report):
Total this Round (recommended) |
$10,414.85 |
$5,800.00
|
|
BALANCE |
|
$69,606.24 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Tenpin Bowling WA for the participation of Luke Daniels, Veronica Joseph and Bradey Van Opijnen at the Tenpin Bowling Australia Disability Nationals held in Sydney NSW from 7 – 17 June 2017;
2. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,500.00 to Joondalup Brothers Rugby Union Football Club for the participation of Deekan O’Connell, Ethan Squire, Dane Luitingh, Joshua Bedworth, Kalani Small, Jesse King, Francois Bequidenhout, Jacob Botha and Ewan Cairns at the Under 15s Rugby Tour to be held in Singapore from 8 -9 October 2017;
3. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,500.00 to Black Swan Taekwondo for the participation of Stefan Vojnovic, Daniel Vojnovic and Nikolas Vojnovic at the CK Malaysian Open Championships held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from 4 – 6 August 2017;
4. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to Goju-Kai Sports Inc for the participation of Nino Karow and Ethan Tran at the 7th Karate-do Goju-kai Global Championships to be held in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada from 28 September to 1 October 2017;
5. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,200.00 to School Sport Western Australia Inc for the participation of Boys Team – Jackson Anderson, Owen Brown, Dylan McCulloch, Joe Quirk, Jacob Smith and Brayden Smith and Girls Team – Charlotte Collier, Charlotte Ericksen, Tiana Forrestal and Hannah Slvic at the School Sport Australia Swimming National Championship to be held in Adelaide SA from 2 – 10 December 2017; and
6. NOT APPROVE a request for a donation for 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $2,730.55 to the Badminton Association of Western Australia for hire of the Kingsway Indoor Stadium for the 2017 Val Nesbitt Trophy and U15 National Championships from 24 – 29 September 2017;
7. NOT APPROVE a request for a donation in the sum of $1,884.30 to the One Big Voice Festival Incorporated to cover the event insurance for the One Big Voice Concert at Perth Arena on 18 August 2017.
Chief Executive Office
File Ref: 9167 – 17/238292
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider proposed minor amendments to the City of Wanneroo’s Delegated Authority Register, Delegation 7.18 – Building Act 2011 – Issue and Revocation of Building Orders, Delegation 9.2 - City of Wanneroo Local Laws and Delegation 11.2 Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 – Appointment of Authorised Officers.
Background
Delegation 7.18 – Building Act 2011 – Issue and Revocation of Building Orders
Administrative amendments to Delegation 7.18 were made in February 2017 with the transition of the Building Services team from the responsibility of the Manager Health & Compliance to the Manager Approval Services.
Delegation 9.2 – City of Wanneroo Local Laws
Amendments to Delegation 9.2 were adopted by Council in June 2016 as part of the annual review of the Delegated Authority Register to consolidate the administration of the City’s local laws into a single delegation.
Delegation 11.2 – Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 – Appointment of Authorised Officers
The Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 (the Act) does not contain a head of power to delegate the appointment of authorised persons to the Chief Executive Officer. Council has delegated this function to the officers shown in the Instrument of Delegation shown at Attachment 3.
Detail
Delegation 7.18 – Building Act 2011 – Issue and Revocation of Building Orders
During the transition of the Building Services team, the functions of the Compliance team in relation to issuing and revoking Building Orders were not considered fully and the function was transferred to the Approval Services Team. In addition WALGA have issued Delegation Register templates to standardise delegations across the local government sector. The template for this function is significantly different from that currently in place and has been updated to include all functions under Part 8 Division 5 – Building Orders of the Building Act 2011.
Administration proposes to amend the instrument of
delegation in accordance with the WALGA template which also allows for the
delegation to the CEO and on delegation to any other local government
employee. The proposed amendment is set out in mark-up in Attachment 1.
Delegation 9.2 – City of Wanneroo Local Laws
During the drafting of the amendments to Delegation 9.2, the Signs Local Law 1999 was inadvertently omitted from the list of local laws recorded within the delegation.
Administration proposes to amend the instrument of delegation to include the Signs Local Law 1999 and this is set out in mark-up in Attachment 2.
Delegation 11.2 – Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 – Appointment of Authorised Officers
During the drafting of this delegation, a reference to the Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Regulations 1997 was omitted.
Administration proposes to amend the instrument of delegation to include a reference to the Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Regulations 1997 and this is set out in mark-up in Attachment 3.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is important for Council to note that delegating a power does not transfer that power to the delegate, it merely replicates it and Council retains the ability to exercise any power or duty delegated to the CEO. (s.59 Interpretation Act 1984).
The essential elements of a Council delegation are the correct and accurate identification of the:
· power or duty to be delegated;
· office to whom or which the power or duty is to be delegated;
· circumstances in which the power or duty can be exercised or discharged; and
· conditions on the exercise of the power or duty.
Statutory Compliance
Building Act 2011
Part 10 Permit authorities
127. Delegation; special permit authorities and local governments
(1) A special permit authority or a local government may delegate any of its powers or duties as a permit authority under another provision of this Act.
(2) A delegation of a special permit authority’s powers or duties may be only to an employee of the special permit authority, or to an employee of one of the legal entities that comprise the special permit authority.
(3) A delegation of a local government’s powers or duties may be only to a local government employee.
(4) The delegation must be in writing executed by or on behalf of the delegator.
(5) Except as provided for in subsection (6A), a person to whom a power or duty is delegated under this section cannot delegate that power or duty.
(6A) The CEO of a local government may delegate to any other local government employee a power or duty of the local government that has been delegated to the CEO under this section but in the case of such a power or duty —
(a) the CEO’s power under this subsection to delegate the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty; and
(b) the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty by the CEO’s delegate, are subject to any conditions, qualifications, limitations or exceptions imposed by the local government on its delegation to the CEO.
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 Administration
Division 4 local government employees
5.42. Delegation of some powers and duties to CEO
(1) A local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or the discharge of any of its duties under —
(a) this Act other than those referred to in section 5.43; or
(b) the Planning and Development Act 2005 section 214(2), (3) or (5).
* Absolute majority required.
(2) A delegation under this section is to be in writing and may be general or as otherwise provided in the instrument of delegation.
5.43. Limits on delegations to CEO
A local government cannot delegate to a CEO any of the following powers or duties —
(a) any power or duty that requires a decision of an absolute majority or a 75% majority of the local government;
(b) accepting a tender which exceeds an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(c) appointing an auditor;
(d) acquiring or disposing of any property valued at an amount exceeding an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(e) any of the local government’s powers under section 5.98, 5.98A, 5.99, 5.99A or 5.100;
(f) borrowing money on behalf of the local government;
(g) hearing or determining an objection of a kind referred to in section 9.5;
(ha) the power under section 9.49A(4) to authorise a person to sign documents on behalf of the local government;
(h) any power or duty that requires the approval of the Minister or the Governor;
(i) such other powers or duties as may be prescribed.
Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995
Part 3 Powers of Entry and Inspection
17. Appointment of authorised person
(1) The chief executive officer of the Department or a local government —
(a) may appoint such persons to be authorised persons for the purposes of this Act as the chief executive officer or the local government considers necessary; and
(b) must issue each person appointed under paragraph (a) with an identity card, in the prescribed form, certifying that the person is an authorised person under this Act.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY ADOPTS the amendments to the following Delegations:-
1. Delegation 7.18 Building Act 2011 – Building Orders to conform with the WALGA Delegation Register template as set out in Attachment 1;
2. Delegation 9.2 City of Wanneroo Local Laws – Administration, to include the Signs Local Law 1999 as set out in Attachment 2; and
3. Delegation 11.2 Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 – Appointment of Authorised Officers to include a reference to the Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Regulations 1997 as set out in Attachment 3.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Proposed Amendments to Delegation 7.18 Building Act 2011 - Issue and Revocation of Building Orders |
17/254618 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Proposed Amendment to Delegation 9.2 City of Wanneroo Local Laws - Administration - July 2017 |
17/230944 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Proposed Amendment to Delegation 11.2 Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds Act 1995 - Appointment of Authorised Officers |
17/240079 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 512
File Ref: 25240 – 17/254243
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the submissions received as a result of the public comment period on the proposed Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 (PALL2017).
Background
At its meeting on 9 May 2017, Council resolved to give notice of a proposal to make a PALL 2017 due to minor amendments required to the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015 (PLL 2015). The purpose and effect of the Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 is:-
Purpose:
The purpose of the Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 is to add an offence for parking or stopping on a painted island unless otherwise allowed by the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015; amend Schedule 1 of the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015 to separate an offence listed in Schedule 1 into 3 components; and to add a modified penalty previously omitted.
Effect:
The local law is amended.
Detail
There are three amendments proposed to PLL 2015 which forms the PALL 2017:-
1. Painted islands
The Road Traffic Code was amended in 2013 to add a definition of ‘painted island’ which was previously missing. The definition of ‘median’ excluded painted markings and created ambiguity with respect to cars parked on medians that were painted rather than made of kerbing and paved or grassed, etc.
Clause 165 of the Road Traffic Code provides that:
“165. Stopping on path, dividing strip, nature strip or painted island
The driver of a vehicle (other than a bicycle, an EPT or an animal) shall not stop so that any portion of the vehicle is on a path, dividing strip, painted island, or a nature strip adjacent to a length of carriageway in a built‑up area, unless —
(a) the driver stops in an area, to which a parking control sign applies and the driver is permitted to stop at that place under these regulations; or
(b) the driver is permitted to do so under a local law.”
Amendments to the PLL 2015 therefore include:-
· A definition of ‘painted island’ to be included in clause 1.5 (definitions) which simply provides that ‘painted island’ has the same meaning as in the Road Traffic Code;
· Amend clause 7.8 so that it reads:
7.8 Stopping on a path, traffic island, median strip or painted island
The driver of a vehicle (other than a bicycle or animal) must not stop so that any portion of the vehicle is on a path, traffic island, median strip or painted island, unless the driver stops in a place where the driver is permitted to stop at that place under this local law, whether by a sign or otherwise;
· A corresponding amendment to Schedule 1 item 76:
|
Item No. |
Clause No. |
Nature of offence |
Penalty Unit |
|
76 |
7.8 |
Stopping on a path, traffic island, median strip or painted island. |
10 |
2. Splitting one grouped item into three in Schedule 1
Item 10 of Schedule 1 of the PALL 2017 proposes to split clause 3.2(1) into separate sub-clauses to better comply with the requirements of the Fines Enforcement Registry to whom the City refers fines if unpaid.
The proposed change will delete the current item 10:
|
10 |
3.2(1) |
Failure to park wholly within parking bay |
10 |
and replace it with the following items:
|
10 |
3.2(1)(a) |
Failure to park parallel to and as close to the kerb as is practicable |
10 |
|
11 |
3.2(1)(b) |
Failure to park wholly within the bay |
10 |
|
12 |
3.2(1)(c) |
Failure to park headed in the direction of the movement of traffic |
10 |
The remaining items in Schedule 1 are to be renumbered accordingly.
3. Add missing modified penalty in Schedule 1
The modified penalty for item 64 in Schedule 1 was missing from the gazetted version. It is to be inserted in the appropriate place.
The draft PALL 2017 is set out in Attachment 1 and is self-explanatory. No other changes are required.
Consultation
The draft PALL 2017 was advertised for comment for a 7 week period closing on 7 July 2017. Two submissions were received from the public and are summarised below.
|
Comment |
Recommended action |
|
I agree with all of the amendments proposed except about the median strip parking. The majority of people when visiting will park on the median strip for various reasons such as the driveway is full or they are stopping for only a short period of time.
|
Parking in the median strip is an offence under the Road Traffic Code. The median strips are in place, not to provide extra parking, but to allow drivers to pull into a driveway on the other side of the street. Parking must always be in accordance with the Road Traffic Code otherwise an office is committed which is subject to a penalty. No changes to the proposed local law are recommended. |
|
In order to conduct my small business I tow a tandem axle trailer. Myself and numerous other trades people rely on painted islands to park in from time to time, in order to conduct business. If these islands are unavailable to park in whilst conducting business then roads will be blocked and a significant traffic hazard would be created.
|
Parking in the median strip is an offence under the Road Traffic Code. Parking must always be in accordance with the Road Traffic Code otherwise an office is committed which is subject to a penalty. No changes to the proposed local law are recommended. |
|
Tradespeople who are towing trailers cannot parallel park the same as a car without a trailer can. Most times the trailer will not fit entirely within the parking bays.
|
Clause 3.2(2) of the Parking Local Law allows a person with a vehicle that is not a standard size to utilise additional parking bays to park their vehicle and states that: ‘If a vehicle is too long or too wide to fit completely within a single parking bay then the person parking the vehicle must do so within the minimum number of parking bays needed to park that vehicle.’
The proposed change to the Parking Local Law is to make the offence for not parking wholly within a bay a separate item in Schedule 1. No changes to the proposed local law are recommended.
|
|
Like many other trades I have doors on both sides of my trailer with different equipment only available from a particular side. I have a legal right and obligation to myself and my family to work in a safe environment. As such this requires me to “not park headed in direction of traffic” on occasions in order to work safely and remove risk of being run over by other road users who are not paying attention.
|
Parking against the flow of traffic is an offence under the Road Traffic Code. Parking must always be in accordance with the Road Traffic Code otherwise an office is committed which is subject to a penalty. The proposed change to the Parking Local Law is to make the offence for not parking a vehicle within a parking bay in a thoroughfare headed in the direction of the movement of traffic on the side of the thoroughfare or parking station in which the bay is situated a separate item in Schedule 1.
The parking of vehicles on a carriageway is dealt with in Clause 4.4. No changes to the proposed local law are recommended.
|
The Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries have recommended a number of minor administrative changes which are shown in mark-up in Attachment 1.
Comment
The amendments suggested are shown in ‘marked up’ in Attachment 1 and are considered minor in nature.
The Parking Amendment Local Law will come into effect 14 days after its publication in the Government Gazette.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulation 3 of the Local Government (Functions & General) Regulations 1996 set out the procedural requirements for the making of a local law.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There are costs associated with advertising and gazettal of the Parking Amendment Local Law.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, in accordance with section 3.12(4) of the Local Government Act 1995, the City of Wanneroo Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 as set out in Attachment 1 subject to acceptance of amendments displayed in ‘mark-up’;
2. NOTES the purpose and effect of the local law as:-
Purpose
The purpose of this Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 is to add an offence for parking or stopping on a painted island unless otherwise allowed by the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015; amend Schedule 1 of the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015 to separate an offence listed in Schedule 1 into 3 components; and to add a modified penalty previously omitted.
Effect
The local law is amended.
3. REQUESTS Administration in accordance with s3.12(5) of the Local Government Act 1995 publish the Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 in the Government Gazette and sends a copy to the Minister for Local Government and Communities;
4. NOTES that after Gazettal, in accordance with s3.12(6) of the Local Government Act 1995, local public notice be given —
a) stating the title of the local law;
b) summarising the purpose and effect of the local law (specifying the day on which it comes into operation); and
c) advising that copies of the local law may be inspected or obtained from the City’s office;
5. NOTES that following Gazettal, in accordance with the Local Laws Explanatory Memoranda Directions as issued by the Minister on 12 November 2010, a copy of the local law and a duly completed explanatory memorandum signed by the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer be sent to the Western Australian Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation; and
6. REQUESTS the Chief Executive Officer to initiate a comprehensive review of the City of Wanneroo Parking Local Law 2015 considering the implications of planning approvals and decisions in relation to parking prohibitions for areas where there is limited parking and the approach to compliance and/or enforcement to be applied (and how applied) in those circumstances.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
DRAFT - Parking Amendment Local Law 2017 |
17/84035 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 22 August, 2017 519
File Ref: 2388 – 17/252701
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To determine a process and procedure for investigating complaints against Elected Members relating to the City’s Council Members Code of Conduct (the Code).
Background
Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the Code deals with contraventions and requires that a person who has reason to believe that an Elected Member has contravened a provision of the Code may complain to the CEO and the procedure for making that complaint is to be determined by the CEO.
Section 4.3 of the Code deals with the procedure for dealing with a complaint and that the procedure to be followed is to be determined by the Council.
As Council has not previously adopted a procedure for dealing with complaints under the Code, the following process is proposed.
Detail
Proposed process:
1. Complaints must be made in writing addressed to the CEO.
2. The CEO is to inform the Mayor of the complaint as soon as it is received. If the complaint is about the Mayor, the CEO will progress the matter through a report to Council.
3. Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint to be sent to the complainant and is to include a statement that the matter will be dealt with by Council according to the procedure detailed in this report.
4. The Elected Member being complained about is to be advised that the City has received a complaint and that the matter will be dealt with according to the procedure adopted by Council.
5. Where the CEO determines that it may be appropriate, the CEO may request that the complainant and the Elected Member participate in an informal dispute resolution process involving an accredited professional mediation service appointed by the City, with a view to effecting an agreement or reconciliation of parties. If an agreement or reconciliation is reached, the CEO is to formally advise all parties, in writing that the matter has been resolved and that this releases the City from any obligation to investigate the matter to which the complaint relates. If an agreement cannot be reached, the matter is to be investigated.
6. The City will engage an external investigating agency to investigate the complaint in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and determine whether, on the balance of probabilities, a breach of the Code has occurred and provide the outcome to the CEO. The CEO will provide a report to Council for a decision on what, if any, sanction(s) is appropriate in the circumstances.
7. The City may refuse to deal with a complaint if the external investigating agency advises that it is satisfied that the complaint is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or without substance, and if the City refuses to deal with a complaint, it must give notice of its reasons for doing so to the complainant.
8. The report is to be presented to Council as a Confidential Report and the Elected Member the subject of the complaint will be informed of the date of the Council meeting at which the matter will be considered. Once the matter is resolved by Council, the complainant is to be informed in writing of the outcome.
9. Complaints are to be kept confidential by all parties until the matter is resolved or as otherwise determined by Council.
10. A person who has made a complaint can withdraw the complaint at any time prior to the City concluding its investigation subject to the following:
a) a withdrawal of a complaint must be in writing addressed to the CEO;
b) if the complaint is withdrawn, a written acknowledgement will be sent to the complainant;
c) the withdrawal of the complaint will:
(i) release the City from any obligation to investigate the matter to which the complaint relates; and
(ii) prevent the City from receiving any further complaint regarding the same subject, unless the City is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
11. Possible sanctions Council may impose for a breach will be in accordance with the Code of Conduct.
Consultation
The City has consulted with the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries.
Comment
Subject to Council’s approval, all complaints received in respect of the Code will be progressed according to the procedure detailed above.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 9 – Conduct of certain officials
5.103 Codes of conduct
(1) Every local government is to prepare or adopt a code of conduct to be observed by council members, committee members and employees.
[(2) deleted]
(3) Regulations may prescribe codes of conduct or the content of, and matters in relation to, codes of conduct and any code of conduct or provision of a code of conduct applying to a local government under subsection (1) is of effect only to the extent to which it is not inconsistent with regulations.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The adoption of a procedure to manage complaints received in regard to breaches of the Code will provide for a consistent approach to the management of those complaints.
Financial Implications
There are costs associated with the investigation of any complaint which will be met from the Governance and Legal operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS the process and procedure detailed in this report for the management of complaints received in relation to alleged breaches of the Council Members’ Code of Conduct; and
2. NOTES that the adopted process and procedure detailed in this report for the management of complaints received in relation to alleged breaches of the Council Members’ Code of Conduct will be formally documented as a management procedure approved by the Chief Executive Officer.
Attachments: Nil
Item 9 Motions on Notice
File Ref: 5302 – 17/266518
Author: Cr Brett Treby
Action Officer: A/Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the City’s response to the increasing incidences of illegal dumping of waste materials on residents’ verges during bulk rubbish uplift periods.
Background
A number of residents have recently contacted me complaining that waste materials are being illegally dumped by “other persons” on the piles of waste materials which they have placed by their verge side ready for uplift by the City during bulk rubbish uplift season. This appears to be an increasing problem, given that the number of communications has increased when compared to that which I have received in previous years.
Detail
The City provides all households with a twice-yearly bulk uplift service; removing greens during one six month period, and bulk rubbish, the other. Residents are required to place their applicable waste materials on the verge in front of their house no more than one week prior to the notified date of bulk uplifts in their area, whereby the City will then drive by and remove those materials by lifting with a skid steer loader in to a rear loading compactor garbage truck during the previously advertised week.
The dumping of waste materials on a verge side is deemed illegal, unless this is undertaken during a time specified by the City for bulk uplifts, and by the resident of the property behind the verge. Rangers and Community Safety Officers have been operating closely with Department of Environment Regulation (DER) and have successfully prosecuted a number of people for illegal dumping. I am proposing that consideration be given to extending this process to include bulk collection times.
Generally Administration has, in recent months, adopted a more collaborative approach to the management of illegal dumping, specifically between the Waste Services and Community Safety and Emergency Management Service Units, which has resulted in a reduction when compared to the previous two years’ experiences. As an example, illegally dumped piles of waste identified by the City have been marked as such, by both Waste Operations staff and City Rangers, with bright yellow tape and signage indicating that the materials are under investigation; this has resulted in 65% of those materials being removed by residents rather than Waste Operations.
The graph, below, highlights the recent overall reduced tonnage of illegally dumped materials in recent months (please note the drop in tonnage during the last three months of 2016/17 [green line]).
Those illegally dumped waste materials removed by the City are generally disposed of at Mindarie Regional Council’s Tamala Park Landfill Facility, costing $174 per tonne. The cost for any materials illegally dumped within the City by commercial entities or residents from outside the City are therefore paid for by the City’s residents through their Rates. The City’s budget for the management of Illegal Dumping during 2017/18 is approximately $948,000.
As approved in the City’s Strategic Waste Management Plan a five year Waste Education Program is currently under development and a Waste Education Officer has recently been employed to better inform the community at large on matters relating to waste management. A Communications Plan will form a subset of the Waste Education Plan, and will be used to inform the community of issues surrounding the City’s waste management practices, the Waste Hierarchy, and what it can do to become more responsible for the waste it produces. The relevant sections of the City’s Waste Local Law will also be included in the Communications Plan, alongside positive messaging on the sustainability aspect of waste management.
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with the City’s Waste Services and Community Safety and Emergency Management Service Units in the development of this report.
Comment
The apparent increase in materials being illegally dumped during bulk uplift periods is resulting in the City, and hence its residents, having to foot the increased bill for its disposal. Added to this the addition of waste to the already deposited residents’ piles is resulting in much increased quantities of materials on the verge side, quite often in an untidy manner, which further reduces the aesthetic qualities of those areas during bulk uplift season.
Whilst it may be argued that there has been a recent improvement in the management of illegal dumping throughout the City, given the results presented in the Detail section of this report, it is apparent that the recent increase in communications from residents highlights a need to address the unlawful dumping of waste materials in bulk waste uplift areas throughout the City. It has even been suggested to me that a lot of these materials do not originate within the City itself, but rather from other neighbouring local authorities and/or commercial businesses.
A review of current operations in the short term may be applicable, to ascertain what measures can be taken right now to minimise these illegal dumping activities. The following measures may be applicable, in this regard:
· The use of covert cameras and the CCTV trailer where appropriate;
· The deployment of the Variable Message Sign (VMS) trailer;
· Adding to the already placed signage a picture of CCTV stating cameras are currently deployed and monitoring this area;
· A more visible presence by Rangers and Safety Patrol Officers; and
· Possible use of social media to expand messaging to invite residents through increased vigilance to report offences.
A short term alternative is an additional notice stating illegal dumping is an offence and anyone caught dumping any type of rubbish will be prosecuted. A slogan “If you see it report it” on 9405 5000.
The City will work to minimise this type of behaviour as it has a huge impact on our services and the amenity of the surrounding area. Anyone found littering or illegally dumping rubbish will be infringed or prosecuted under the City’s Local Laws or the Litter Act 1979.
In the longer term, the development and roll out of a Waste Education Plan is key to informing the community on its options with regard to waste management, and the need to comply with the City’s Waste Local Law.
Statutory Compliance
Litter Act 1979.
City of Wanneroo Waste Local Law 2016.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.3 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Waste
3.3.2 Foster a partnership with community and industry to reduce waste”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-022 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-023 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Waste Services Policy.
Financial Implications
There is $948,000 allocated in the City’s 2017/18 budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the range of measures identified within the report to increase surveillance, patrols, and social media to highlight this issue, and
2. SUPPORTS, where sufficient evidence exists, undertaking the process of prosecution where unlawful dumping has occurred.
Administration Comment
Ranger and Safety Patrol Officers can work with Waste Services staff and local residents to identify persons involved with illegal dumping and littering.
The Community Safety and Emergency Management Service Unit do not have specific human or financial resources designated for this type of activity and as a result any resources allocated will need to be covered within the existing operational budget.
Attachments: Nil
File Ref: 29299 – 17/268473
Author: Cr Domenic Zappa
Action Officer: Director Community & Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Consideration of the development of a policy regarding Men’s and Women’s Sheds with in the City of Wanneroo and the concerns raised by the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed Inc. (NSMS) that may impact on their ongoing operations due to lack of an appropriate facility from which to operate.
Background
In a meeting with representatives from the NSMS on 8 August 2017, concerns were raised that the premises that is currently utilised to operate the NSMS may no longer be available.
The NSMS has been in operation for the past five years. Over the last three years it has been in discussion with the City of Wanneroo to try to establish a permanent location.
At present the NSMS has approximately 45 members and operate three days per week from a privately owned factory unit on Gnangara Road, Landsdale.
While the NSMS is not formally leasing or paying rent for the facility, they do contribute to the outgoings.
Indications from the NSMS are that the property owner has a current interest in leasing the factory unit that the Shed occupies and unless the Shed is able to pay rent, then under their current agreement, they will have four weeks to vacate.
This issue has also identified a need for a policy framework to guide Council and Administration in dealing with requests for financial assistance for both Men’s and Women’s Sheds into the future.
Detail
Policy regarding the development Men’s and Women’s Sheds
Over recent years the increase of Men’s and Women’s Sheds in the Perth metropolitan area has placed pressure on Local Governments and funding bodies such as LotteryWest to manage requests for the provision of land and facilities.
The key outcomes sought from a policy position on the development of Men’s and Women’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo are:
a) Outline the level of support and assistance the Council is prepared to provide Men’s and Women’s Sheds within the locality;
b) Establish a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the WA Men’s Shed Association Inc. (the state governing body) regarding the development of sheds with the City of Wanneroo, with a particular focus on:
i. The number of Sheds and their geographical catchments within the locality (proposed two north ward, one central ward and one south ward);
ii. The support and assistance to be provided by the City of Wanneroo;
iii. The process on the establishment of any new Shed’s in the City of Wanneroo into the future.
It is critical from a strategic perspective that Council has a policy position to ensure that economies of scale with its resource allocation to Men’s and Women’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo can be achieved.
It is recognised that these Sheds provide a valuable service to the residents of the City of Wanneroo and a policy framework will assist in ensuring their long term sustainability.
Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed Inc.
In correspondence to the City received on 10 August 2017, the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed has outlined a range of options to address their current situation including:
1. Close the operations of the Men’s Shed.
2. Seek funding assistance from the City and other funding bodies to contribute towards rent to enable a facility of approximately 450 to 550m2 to be leased for a period of two to three years whilst the Men’s Shed considers options for acquiring land and/or a facility.
3. Investigate options for leasing or sub-leasing a community purposes site and explore options for financing the development of a facility.
It is recognised by the Men’s Shed that the immediate need is to obtain an existing facility in order for their operations to continue. The Shed has had an increase in membership over the past six months and are looking to expand their operating hours.
The Men’s Shed has indicated that there is a suitable factory unit available at their current location that could be leased at a cost of approximately $18,000 per annum. This is on the basis that the owner is agreeable to considering a subsidised lease fee rather than market value given that the Men’s Shed is a not-for-profit organisation providing valuable services to the community. The Men’s Shed is seeking financial assistance from the City and other funding bodies to pay the lease fees for a period of two to three years, but is initially seeking financial assistance from the City to cover a period of six months.
It is anticipated that within the next six months the City’s Administration and Council will have developed financial assistance models as part of the 2017/18 mid-year budget review to support the provision of facilities for community organisations such as Men’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo.
In the longer term the Men’s Shed has identified three community purposes sites that may be suitable for the development of a Men’s Shed facility including one on a portion of Nanovich Park that is currently leased by the City to the Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club.
Consultation
The Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed has previously had discussions with Wheelchairs for Kids Inc. about the possibility of developing a facility for both organisations to operate from. The Men’s Shed has also had discussions with the Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club about potential to utilise a portion of Nanovich Park.
It is anticipated that Administration will consult with the WA Men’s Shed Association Inc. regarding the development of any policy.
Comment
Men’s Sheds provide an opportunity for men to undertake activities such as wood work and metal work, whilst connecting in a social environment to reduce social isolation, gain support from their peers and access information about a range of men’s health issues.
The Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed is one of five Community Sheds currently operating within the City of Wanneroo – four Men’s Sheds and one Women’s Shed.
The City currently does not have a Policy on the development of Men’s or Women’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo or the level of assistance that may be provided. Previous support for Men’s Sheds has been provided in the form of a land lease for the Wanneroo Community Men’s Shed, access to funding under the City’s Community Funding Program for eligible projects and assistance with capacity building.
The Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed is seeking assistance from the City to contribute to the lease fees for a suitable facility to enable their operations to continue in the short term while they explore longer term options.
There is a significant concern that the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed will have to cease operations if suitable premises cannot be obtained.
Given that the City does not currently have a policy in relation to the development of Men’s and Women’s Shed or a program that provides financial assistance for operating costs of the nature, it is recommended that a financial contribution of $9,000 be provided to the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed to enable them to stay at their current location for six months until Council has further opportunity to consider this matter.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
There are no policies that are relevant to this item.
Financial Implications
The Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed is seeking a financial contribution from the City of $9,000 to cover six month rental at their current facility.
There is currently no funding specifically allocated within the City’s 2017/18 budget for this expenditure. There is however the potential allocate $9,000 from the Community Funding Program to fund this request.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. REQUESTS that Administration develop a Policy on the development of Men’s and Women’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo;
2. REQUESTS that Administration consult with WA Men’s Shed Association Inc. (WAMSA) on the development of such a Policy and pursues the development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with WAMSA aligned to the Policy.
3. REQUESTS that Administration develop a report on possible financial assistance that can be considered as part of the 2017/18 mid-year budget review to support the provision of facilities for community organisations such as Men’s Sheds within the City of Wanneroo; and
4. BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, APPROVES a financial contribution of $9,000 to the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed Inc. to cover six months rent to enable the Men’s Shed to continue operating from their current premises with the funding to be allocated from the 2017/18 Community Funding Program.
Administration Comment
A discussion paper on supporting community organisations including Men’s Sheds was presented to Council Forum on 1 August 2017.
Administration subsequently agreed to undertake the following actions:
1. Continue to provide various strategies to support community organisations to build capacity.
2. Further investigate current levels of rent that would be payable by Men’s Sheds operating out of private premises such as the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed and the Yanchep Community Men’s Shed.
3. Further investigate a potential model to support financial assistance for operating costs such as rent, including source, level, timing and process of distributing such funding if it were to become available.
These actions will be progressed however in the interim the request from the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed for financial assistance has been received. The Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed has indicated that unless they receive financial assistance or are able to secure another premises free-of-charge, they will need to cease operations and a valued community service could be lost.
Whilst Administration has investigated various options for existing community facilities, to date an alternative premises that is suitable for the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed to operate from has not been identified. Even if suitable land for leasing was identified, the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed does not have the capacity to develop a facility within the next 12 to 24 months.
A review of the existing policies and programs in relation to the provision of financial assistance to community organisations indicates that the nature of the request does not currently fit the criteria for funding. As a result, if this request from the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed was to be supported this would be unbudgeted expenditure and requires an absolute majority decision of Council to enable the expenditure to be committed in the 2017/18 financial year.
The recommendation includes a provision that if the request is approved for the NSMS, the $9,000 be taken from the 2017/18 Community Funding Program. The Community Funding Program has $90,000 allocated in the 2017/18 budget to cover two rounds of applications. The first round is due to open on 4 September and close on 13 October 2017. Applications are then considered by the Community Funding Working Group and submitted to Council for approval.
This does have the risk of setting precedence for other community organisations to make similar requests hence the reason for identifying a need for further investigation of a potential model to support financial assistance for operating costs of this nature to ensure transparency, accountability and the appropriate framework is in place.
Given the risk of setting precedence, the need for transparency and accountability in providing financial assistance to community organisations and the work that will be undertaken to develop a report on this issue over the coming months, it is recommended that the request from the Northern Suburbs Men’s Shed for financial assistance be considered as part of the 2017/18 mid-year budget review.
Item 10 Urgent Business
CR01-08/17 Acquisition of land for Gnangara Road road widening from Lot 336 (99) Gnangara Road, Wangara.
File Ref: 5372 – 17/254894
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government
File Ref: 2856V04 – 17/265542
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(a) a matter affecting an employee or employees
The next Elected Members’ Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6:00pm on 12 September 2017, to be held at Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
