Item PS02-03/19 Close of Advertising – Local Environmental Strategy

The last paragraph on page 8 of this report reads in part, “…once the LES has been endorsed by Council, a detailed action plan will be prepared by Administration and presented to Council for endorsement…”  I would like to know what time frame is envisaged for the delivery of the action plan and whether a draft action plan will be advertised for public comment, as was the draft LES?

Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

The draft Action Plan is anticipated to be prepared by mid-2019, and will then be submitted to Council for endorsement.  The Action Plan will reflect the priorities set out in the Tables 4-9 in the LES and will be also be supported by the Environmental Management System currently being established by Administration.

It is anticipated that the majority of the actions will be operational such as the preparation of policies, strategies, plans, procedures and guidelines and therefore it is not proposed for this to be publically advertised.  Any new or updated local planning policies, strategies and plans will be subject to Council endorsement and public consultation.

Allegation of staff misconduct

Considering the fact that the BDO Finance report that was carried out into my allegations, evidenced that staff misconduct had been confirmed and that one staff member had been issued a verbal warning by the City leaders, why have the Elected Members ignored the fact that under the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2013, the CEO has an obligation to report and record misconduct and didn’t.  The BDO investigators statement into the staff members actions being unauthorised, not impartial or unbiased are consistent with the description of misconduct under the terms of the Corruption Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, part1, Div 1, sec 4 (a,b,c,d). 

Despite the fact that I have evidence the City have now approved three non-compliant retrospective applications to the same unlicensed builder, and the staff member was removed from his role at the City, the CEO still falsely states that my complaint, which the BDO report confirms is valid is unreasonable.  The CEO’s false statement is an offence under the Criminal Code, Part 111, Chapter XX, sec 169 & 170.  The City’s Elected Members have a duty to address these serious offences to ensure that the CEO, and the City are delivering good, honest governance, to all residents.

Response by Executive Manager, Governance & Legal

Mr Adam has been previously advised on numerous occasions that the City (including all Administration staff and Elected Members) will no longer engage with him in respect of these allegations or the complaints relating to the same issues with owner of and the property located at 4 Yarmouth Road Jindalee, as the City has determined that all of the matters have been investigated and satisfactorily resolved.

The CEO determined that the outcome of the independent investigation and the investigation report were to be forwarded to the Corruption and Crime Commission complying with the principal officer’s statutory obligations in accordance with the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003. 

The City has determined to implement and continues to maintain a protocol to manage persistent and unreasonable complaints in accordance with the City’s Compliments, Feedback and Complaints Policy and the Ombudsman of WA guidelines.

Active Reserves Master Plan – Addison Park project

1.         Why did residents living in the vicinity of Addison Park receive notification on 19th February that the City would be proceeding with a project to extend the AFL oval with work due to commence15th March without having received the usual invitation to participate in the Community Engagement process as per City policy and procedures?

Response by Director, Community & Place

As per the response provided by Administration on 27 February 2019, a specific community consultation process for the project had not been undertaken. Community consultation had occurred as a part of the development of the Active Reserve Master Plan and, as noted advice has been distributed in respect to the commencement of the works. The fact that consultation did not occur was the result of an error by Administration.   When the error was noticed, a hold was put on the Addison Park extension and floodlighting project to enable the appropriate processes to be undertaken.

2.         Did Council give approval for the project to go ahead without it going through the Community Engagement process?

Response by Director, Community & Place

Council approval for the Addison Park Master Plan, as a part of the City’s Active Reserve Master Plan, occurred in October 2016 with the project approved within the 2018/19 budget which was endorsed by Council in June 2018. Council has not specifically considered the Addison Park oval extension and floodlighting project as a stand-alone item.

3.         Why did the notification to residents dated 13 February (19/55810 Attachment A) not include a plan or provide residents with any details of the work to be carried out?

Response by Director, Community & Place

The intent of the correspondence was to inform of the project and included a copy of the plan (and any other subsequent information) being available upon request.

4.         Why does the plan for the proposed extension included in the Active Reserves Master Plan 2016 endorsed by Council (19/86144 Attachment B) differ to the plan provided to contractors?

Response by Director, Community & Place

As per the response provided by Administration on 1 March 2019, the intent of the City’s Active Reserve Master Plan (ARMP) and the respective individual Master Plans, is to provide a high level guide as to the proposed infrastructure upgrades associated with each of the active reserves, supported by a list of recommendations. In a normal course of events a further, and more detailed, concept plan of the proposed works is developed for the proposed project and it is this plan that forms the basis of the community engagement process. Given the scope of the Active Reserve Master Plan process (i.e. covering all of the City’s existing active reserves) it was not practical to go to the detailed concept level for each reserve as a part of the ARMP process.

5.         Attachment B does not indicate any clearance of trees or remnant bush from the park. However, the project plan provided to me on request (19/86161 Attachment C) shows a significantly larger area of oval extension and different locations for the floodlights requiring the clearing of a significant area of remnant bush and a number of large trees. I have been advised that clearing permit had been issued for the work to commence. When was the new plan drawn up and was it approved by Council?

Response by Director, Community & Place

As noted in the answer to question 4, the ARMP Master Plan for Addison Park provides a high level guide in respect to the proposed infrastructure upgrades, that are subsequently refined as a part of the initial concept development. As stated above, the proposed plan has not been considered by Council as a stand-alone item.

It was only by chance that I discovered the area of bush that provides a natural buffer between the sports oval and the informal recreation area was to be cleared. A friend and I were on our regular morning walk with our dogs when we came across a man, who turned out to be a contractor, surveying the site and referring to a plan. We asked to see it and were shocked to see the area of bush marked for clearing. It took numerous phone calls and emails to different City officers over a number of days before I could get someone to contact me to discuss my concerns. The Manager Community Facilities eventually spoke with me and was very responsive with the outcome that he has placed the project on hold with the intention of undertaking the community engagement process. 

Will Council conduct an investigation into how this breach of policy and procedures occurred and direct that an audit be undertaken of all the projects included in the City’s Active Reserves Master Plan to identify if the Addison park project is an isolated incident or if it is an indicator of wider maladministration?

Further Response by Director, Community & Place

A review of the process applied in this instance will be undertaken in respect to the City’s Community Engagement Policy requirements at the direction of the Director Community & Place.  Any improvements that are identified as part of the review will be implemented as required.

Item PS02-03/19 Close of Advertising – Local Environmental Strategy

1.        I commend the City of Wanneroo for the production of their Local Environmental Strategy (LES).  The LES has identified vegetation complexes which are listed under the Federal EPBC Act and complexes that are only found in East Wanneroo. (Flora and Fauna page 17 – Briefing Page 29).

What immediate action does the City of Wanneroo intend to take to protect these complexes and ensure their survival in view of a written communication to which I have access?  Environmental risks with the view to future development are outlined i.e. Banksia Attenuata 20A and Banksia Woodlands generally.  The Banksia Attenuata 20A is an endangered species and Banksia Woodland a threatened ecological community.

Information within the document notes that if a 30m break is created between these endangered communities they will no longer be considered a Threatened Ecological Community in a broader context.  Therefore if adjoining properties each create 15 metre firebreaks neither the State Planning, EPA or the Federal Government approval may be needed.  I am aware and have seen that there are landowners in East Wanneroo who have already followed this advice.

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

While the Local Environmental Strategy broadly lists the vegetation complexes found within the City, it is the City’s recently adopted Local Biodiversity Plan (LBP) which primarily addresses the protection of vegetation complexes within the City.   The LBP lists the vegetation complexes and prioritises these according to a number of criteria, which include the remaining extent of the complexes within the City. It is the City’s intention to facilitate the further protection of these complexes through a list of actions included in the LBP. 

Banksia woodlands are listed by the Federal Government as endangered and as such their further removal is subject to stringent Federal and State environmental legislation.

Firebreaks should be created in accordance with the City’s annual Firebreak Notice and in terms of this, must be no more than 3 metres in width. Anything in addition to the required 3 metres would be subject to separate approvals.  Any illegal removal of vegetation beyond that which is required for fire protection is unlawful and should be referred to the City and to the Department of Water and Environment Regulation.

2.         Refers to Built Form and Liveability – page 28 – Briefing page 40.

LES has noted that the shift to higher density is creating a built form with increasing environmental issues among which it lists:

Heat islands

Insufficient street-tree canopy cover

In the early 2000s I queried with the then MLA for Wanneroo the wholesale destruction of mature trees occurring through urban development.  I was told that developers were becoming more environmentally conscious and mature trees were identified by pink ribbons of which I have seen very few over the following years.  Facts about mature trees and the canopy they provide include:

·                  The provision of oxygen and the limiting of carbon in the atmosphere

·                  Reduction of air pollution

·                  Food and shelter for wildlife

·                  Minimisation of erosion

·                  Maintaining healthy soil

·                  Increased rainfall – they have a dramatic effect on weather systems most important

·                  Provision of windbreaks

·                  Absorption and blocking of noise plus reduction of glare

Bearing in mind that a mature tree will take between 20 to 30 years to reach its potential.  Do we have that much time to wait?  Is it not time to recognise the value of mature trees native or otherwise and adequately protect them and to continue to plant suitable species of trees to ensure the future canopy?

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

The City acknowledges that clearing has occurred in response to residential development, and continues to work with developers through the planning process to ensure that the removal of mature trees are minimised.  In addition, the City also facilitates the planting of trees within street reserves and in parks. 

The Local Environmental Strategy (LES) has identified the need to investigate and better respond to the City’s diminishing urban forest.  In this regard, Tables 4 (Native Vegetation) and 8 (Air Quality) both acknowledge this as a key issue, and propose the preparation of an urban forest strategy to facilitate this.  It is anticipated that the preparation of such a strategy would be included as one of the actions of the LES Action Plan.

3.          With the present policy of development which allows acres of clear felling how does the Council propose to retain a healthy environment and reduce the local effect of climate change?.  Is the Council responsible for allowing this massive clearing of vegetation or is it State Planning Commission?

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

Vegetation clearing for urban development is considered as part of the planning and development process, which is facilitated through the City as well as the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).  The planning for development typically begins with structure planning, followed by the subdivision process, with structure plans and subdivisions determined by the WAPC, with the City acting as a referral agency. During this process, the City typically provides comments on a particular planning proposal in line with the City’s planning scheme, local planning policies, plans and strategies (which includes the City’s Local Biodiversity Plan).

Through this process, developers are required to undertake extensive investigations into the environmental values of an area that they wish to develop, which include all necessary approvals under State and Federal environmental legislation (i.e. the State-level Environmental Protection Act 1986 and the Federal-level Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.  Approvals under the legislation often require developers to provide substantial environmental offsets that include acquisition of land for conservation, street tree planting, and revegetation.

Item PS02-03/19 Close of Advertising – Local Environmental Strategy and CS07-03/19 Consideration of Motions received at the Annual General Meeting of Electors

I have received the replacement Energy Reduction Plan which was a severe disappointment, with the main recommendation being to monitor energy use in three schools for 3 years.  Do Councillors understand that climate change is with us now?  The IPCC’s latest report, SR1.5 tells us that human induced warming reached approximately 1^oC above pre-industrial levels in 2017.  Effective action is needed urgently, not in three years’ time when the monitoring under the EAP has finished, but now.  Will Council therefore make a commitment through the LES to actions 25, 26 and 31 in the old Energy Action Plan to inform and change community behaviour before it is too late?  

Response by Director Planning and Sustainability

The Energy Reduction Plan was recently adopted by Council and it was a deliberate plan that focussed firstly on the City and the City’s buildings to monitor the City’s energy use and look at a number of strategies that the City could adopt to reduce its energy use and lead by example.  The review that will commence in 2020 will then focus on an education campaign, targeted at the local community to try to assist in addressing climate change.  The Local Environmental Strategy is before Council this evening.  The Strategy has been subject to extensive consultation and it is not Administration’s intent to change any of the local Environmental Strategy at this stage.

 East Wanneroo Structure Plan

We have recently become aware that the WA Planning Commission have changed the East Wanneroo Structure Plan, moving the boundary from Golfview Place to Lakelands with no consultation with the community.  What will the City of Wanneroo do to reinstate the original East Wanneroo Structure Plan boundary back to Golfview Place?  After contacting the City about this I was told there was nothing that I could do as a resident and to just accept it.  This is an unacceptable response.  When I purchased my property two years ago I was not told the area was going to be urbanised.  Administration informed me it was in the newspaper six years ago, but I did not live here then.  Why has this boundary been changed?

Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

This refers to the State Government’s document, the North-west Sub-Regional Planning Framework which has identified that this area has been referred to as an urban investigation area.  The purpose of the urban investigation area is to consider through further studies whether the area is suitable for urbanisation.  That work will be completed through a District Structure Plan which is currently being prepared by the State Government and the intention is for that District Structure Plan to be advertised in April or May for a three month consultation period. 

The City of Wanneroo, like the local community, will be invited to make comments on that document and provide those responses back to the WA Planning Commission for it to make a decision.  This is not a proposal made by the City of Wanneroo.  The City will need to consider what is included in the District Structure Plan and this will be analysed by Administration, with a report to be presented to Elected Members as the basis of its submission on the District Structure Plan.  We do not know the detail of that document at this stage as it has not been published for consultation.

Community style meetings

Will Council look at doing some community style meetings on a regular basis to get out into the community and listen to some of the concerns and ideas of the ratepayers?  Everyone has the opportunity to come to Council but a lot of people won’t do that for various reasons and don’t feel comfortable in approaching Councillors. 

Response by Mayor Roberts

We are a consulting Council and we do listen to our community.    At the moment the City is looking at opportunities in Two Rocks/Yanchep and Girrawheen/Koondoola which is our furthermost north and south areas and if we can look at further consultation we will. 

East Wanneroo Structure Plan

Residents are concerned about small planning errors occurring in the City of Wanneroo which over time result in a catastrophe, for example putting  50,000 homes into an area that doesn’t have a state of the art sewerage, approving service stations being built in areas that are dangerous to get in and out of and the list goes on.

Response by Mayor Roberts

Some of the service stations have been approved by the Joint Development Assessment Panel which is not a decision of the Council.

Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

You are referring to the proposals for the urbanisation of East Wanneroo which is not a proposal made by the City of Wanneroo, it is a proposal made as part of the North-west Sub-Regional Planning Framework and subsequent District Structure Plans by the WA Planning Commission. 

Item PS02-03/19 Close of Advertising – Local Environmental Strategy

(see also PQ04-03/19 above)

1.        Referring to the Administration’s response to question 1 in PQ04-03/19 above, which states “the illegal removal of vegetation beyond which is required for a firebreak protection is unlawful…” – what is the City going to do about this because it is happening, if nothing is done there will be no banksia woodland left?

Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

         The City and the State Government takes action against any illegal clearing of native vegetation where it is brought to the City’s attention.  If you have any examples of this, the City would investigate and liaise with State Government to take the appropriate action.

2.       How is it advertised to the public that it is unlawful?

          Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

There is a lot of information available on State Government or City of Wanneroo website in terms of what the legislation does enable or allow in terms of clearing.  With regard to compliance, there is 684sq km of the City and only a relatively small number of compliance officers so do rely on the local community informing us of any illegal activity.  Where informed of this type of activity, compliance officers do go and investigate independently and do not divulge where information is obtained from.

3.      Ms O’Brien read out questions 2. and 3. submitted in writing which are shown at
PQ04-03/19 above.

          Response by Mayor Roberts

         From a Council’s perspective, we also understand the importance of the trees and the tree canopy and their benefits.  The City will be planting tens of thousands of trees in addition to what the developers will be planting so do understand their importance.

          Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

In addition to the responses contained in PQ04-03/19 above, the City acknowledges that clearing has occurred in response to residential development.  We are a growth Council and try to balance the growth by retaining as much of the mature, high quality vegetation through new development by identifying that through public open space as well as Bush Forever which is identified through the State Government.  The Local Environmental Strategy has identified the need to investigate and better respond to the City’s diminishing urban forest in this regard.  Tables 4 and 8 of the Local Environmental Strategy acknowledge that this is a key issue and propose the preparation of an urban forest strategy to facilitate that.  This will be something identified in the next stage, which is the Local Environmental Strategy Action Plan.

Item PS02-03/19 Close of Advertising – Local Environmental Strategy

(see also PQ01-03/19 above)

1.       Ms Cundall read out her question submitted in writing which is shown at PQ01-03/19.

           Response by Director, Planning and Sustainability

           The Director referred to the response contained in PQ03-03/19.

2.        Referring to the response to the previous question from Ms O’Brien regarding firebreak notices, from memory it states they need to be a minimum of 3m and do not know if there is a maximum?   If there is a maximum, land owners need to be advised of that because if it is unlawful, some of us may be breaking a law?

          Response by Director, Community and Place

          The minimum firebreak is 3m however I would need to take on notice whether there is    a maximum limit for firebreaks. 

          Further Response by Director, Community and Place

          It is acknowledged that the word “minimum’ has caused some confusion and the Firebreak Notice will be amended for the 2019/20 season to provide clarity. There is no maximum listed on the Firebreak Notice.

Active Reserves Master Plan – Addison Park project

(see also PQ03-03/19 above)

Ms Casey read out questions 1 – 6 submitted in writing which are shown at PQ03-03/19.

Response by Mayor Roberts

It is disturbing to hear some of your questions as we do have due process and I have a concern there is something missing in the due process. 

Response by Director, Community and Place

The City has become aware that there was an oversight with this particular project in regard to community consultation and as a result the project has been put on hold to allow community consultation to occur and the further questions will be responded to in due course. 

Response by Mayor Roberts

Please clarify that the entire project is on hold while we go through due process and if this is an isolated incident? 

Response by Director, Community and Place

The entire project is on hold and as far as I am aware, this is an isolated incident.  Relevant staff are putting processes in place to ensure that within our project management framework there is a check and balance to make sure the community consultation has occurred in line with the project mandates are developed.

7.      How can we be sure it is an isolated incident unless a full audit is undertaken? If we hadn’t come across this by accident, that area of land would have been cleared and the trees removed.

          Response by Chief Executive Officer

         The Director of Community and Place will do a  full review of this specific project that will as part of that review, test all our systems and processes to make sure that it is isolated.  If as a result of testing our systems and processes we find that there are other examples, or there are control weaknesses that are identified through this review that we need to fix to ensure it doesn’t occur in other projects, then we will do that. As well as the Director conducting the review, I will examine the review as we spend a lot of time in developing a good project management system and framework to ensure we follow good process, we value community consultation as a beginning of all our processes in project management so Council is equally as keen to understand how this has occurred.

Moved Cr Newton, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 5 February 2019 be confirmed.

Carried Unanimously

This item has been withdrawn and will be on the Agenda for the 9 April 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting.

Mayor Roberts presented a petition of 4,213 signatories in support of the motion by Mayor Roberts and Cr Sangalli for the early provision of an aquatic facility in the Butler electorate.

Cr Sangalli presented a petition of 81 signatories requesting a reduction in the remaining security fencing surrounding the Sun City Golf Course in front of Numbers 8 to 24 Bunker Crescent and where the barbed wire is visible in front of all houses surrounding Sun City Country Club.

Cr Driver presented a petition of 25 signatories requesting the installation of toilets at Catalina Beach Park, corner of Marmion Avenue and Aviator Boulevard, Mindarie.

Cr Zappa presented a petition of 27 signatories for the transition of an exercise class for the Seniors at the Hainsworth Community Centre (18/550206).

Update

Administration is currently consulting with program participants. A report relating to this item will be presented at the Ordinary Council Meeting on Tuesday, 9 April 2019.

File Ref:                                              37191 – 19/43308

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Cr Driver, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council:-

1.      Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 176 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to amend the local planning scheme by deleting the land use definition for ‘convenience store’ from Schedule 1 and replacing it with the following:

convenience store: means premises –

(a)     used for the retail sale of convenience goods commonly sold in supermarkets, delicatessens or newsagents; and

(b)     operated during hours which include, but may extend beyond, normal trading hours; and

(c)     the floor area of which does not exceed 300m² net lettable area;

2.       Pursuant to Regulation 34 and Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 176 is a basic amendment for the following reason:

          An amendment to the scheme so that it is consistent with the model provisions in Schedule 1 or with another provision of the local planning scheme;

3.       Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 176 to the Environmental Protection Authority;

4.       Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, PROVIDES Amendment No. 176 to the Western Australian Planning Commission; and

5.       AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL Amendment No. 176 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              27777 – 19/30648

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       2         

Moved Cr Fenn, Seconded Cr Aitken

That Council:-

1.       NOTES the submissions received in respect of the draft Local Environmental Strategy;

2.       ENDORSES the modifications to the draft Strategy outlined in the table of submissions included in Attachment 2;

3.       ADOPTS the final Local Environmental Strategy included in Attachment 1;

4.       NOTES that a detailed Action Plan will be prepared by Administration and presented to Council for endorsement; and

5.       PUBLISHES notice of its adoption of the Local Environmental Strategy in the Wanneroo Times and Wanneroo Weekender Community newspapers, and INFORMS those persons who made submissions of Council’s decision.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              23145 – 19/56487

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       5         

Moved Cr Newton, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council:-

1.    APPROVES the recommendations contained within the Audit & Risk Committee  Report 6.1 – “Administration of Developer Contributions Arrangements East Wanneroo Cell 1” of 19 February 2019, as per the following;

a)    NOTES the background, process and timing in relation to the Annual Review of Cells 1-9 as outlined in this report.

b)  ENDORSES the application of the provisions of DPS 2 in respect of Cell Works to:

i.     Confirm that Cell Works includes the list of works prescribed in Schedule 6 of DSP 2;

ii.    Exclude intersection treatments prior to January 2005 and not charging these to the Developer Contribution Plan, with only intersection lighting (i.e. and not all lighting) being included as a Cell Work before January 2005 (prior to Amendment 17 to DPS No. 2);

iii.   Exclude other roadworks made necessary as a consequence of development and not charging these to the Developer Contribution Plan;

iv.   Include and charge to the Developer Contribution Plan only interest or other borrowing costs that were incurred by the City in order to raise funds for Cell Works, including any adjustments to interest attributed to the Cell as a result of the Audit adjustments;

v.    Include and charge to the Developer Contribution Plan the specified percentage of the cost of laying a single carriageway;

vi.   Include and charge to the Developer Contribution Plan the full cost of earthworks for a dual carriageway;

vii.  Include and charge to the Developer Contribution Plan the cost of structures including kerbing, service ducts, street lighting, intersection treatments; relocation of existing services, dual use paths, and structures ultimately built for a dual carriageway; and

viii. Include and charge to the Developer Contribution Plan the costs of relevant environmental offsets as required through the relevant Environment Offset Management Plan/s. 

c)    NOTES the findings of the Transactional Audit for Cell 1. 

d)   ENDORSES the following methodology for the Annual Review for Cell 1, utilising  the total ‘estimated excess funds at full development’ as a basis for calculating the revised Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) by;

i.     Applying the current Infrastructure Cost Per Lot for Cell 1;

ii.    Applying an estimate for a partial return of excess funds at full development to the Infrastructure Cost Per Lot;

iii.   Adopting the reduced Infrastructure Cost Per Lot for future subdividers;

iv.   Supporting a return of excess funds for Cell 1 to landowners after a contingency of between 16-25% has been retained, noting that a final reconciliation of the Cell 1 accounts will occur upon development of all the land in the Cell. 

e)    ENDORSES the Annual Review for Cell 1 in accordance with the following process and key milestones:

i.     Report to Council to consider the Cell 1 Annual Review on 5 March 2019;

ii.    Public advertising of the Cell 1 Annual Review for 42 days from mid-March 2019;

iii.   Consideration of submissions by Council on 7 May 2019 or at a Special Council meeting shortly thereafter.

2.    APPROVES the methodology for the Annual Review of costs for East Wanneroo Cell 1 by utilising the total ‘estimated excess funds at full development’ as a basis for calculating the revised Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) for remaining landowners.

3.    NOTES that the reduction in the current ICPL from $25,835.54 to $18,808.74 has been based on applying the estimated total excess funds at full development of the cell and applying a per contribution estimate of returns of $7,026.80 to reduce the ICPL rate.

4.    NOTES that an amount of $23,167,363 has been identified as the estimated portion of excess funds at full development that is applicable to those landowners that have already made a contribution to date and that:

a)    A partial return of estimated excess funds is recommended, pending further reconciliation of the scheme accounts for excess funds upon development of all the land in cell in accordance with Clause 9.13.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, or as otherwise agreed by Council;

b)    Notwithstanding the Audit & Risk Committees endorsement of a range of 16%-25%, Administration has determined that a contingency of 12% should be applied and held by the City on behalf of the contributing landowners and will not form part of the ‘future’ subdividers claim on future excess funds at full development of Cell 1. This contingency figure is subject to review and endorsement by external auditors William Buck.

c)    The methodology of partial return is recommended to be based on the developers contributions (total ICPL paid) as a proportion of total ICPL contributions collected.

5.    ADVERTISES the revised rate of $1,862,500.00 as the proposed average englobo value per hectare for East Wanneroo Cell 1 in accordance with Clause 9.14.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

6.    ADVERTISES the revised Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) of $18,808.74 for East Wanneroo Cell 1 in accordance with Clause 9.11.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

7.    NOTES that any excess funds generated on future subdivision or development of land within Cell 1 (currently undeveloped) will need to be apportioned over all contributing landowners within the cell upon the development  of all the land within the cell in accordance with Clause 9.13.3 or other methodology agreed by Council; and

8.    NOTES the deletion of the underpass located immediately south of the intersection of Bonanella Entrance and Pinjar Road.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

File Ref:                                              36242 – 18/512234

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       2         

Moved Cr Fenn, Seconded Cr Flood

That Council:-

1.         Pursuant to Section 75 of Planning and Development Act 2005 ADOPTS Amendment No.171 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to allow the use class Restricted Premises as an additional use at Strata Lot 7 at 20 Prindiville Drive, Wangara and AMENDS Schedule 2 of the DPS 2 as follows:

and the Scheme Map accordingly;

2.         Pursuant to Section 35(2) of Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 171 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a Standard Amendment for the following reason:

The Amendment would not result in any significant environmental, social, economic or governance impacts on land in the scheme area;

3.         Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 REFERS Amendment No. 171 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority; and

4.         Subject to approval from Environmental Protection Authority:

a)    NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning Commission of its intent to advertise Amendment No. 171 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and

b)    ADVERTISES Amendment No. 171 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 42 days pursuant to Regulation 47(2) and 47(4) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              36981 – 19/21139

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       3         

Moved Cr Nguyen, Seconded Cr Fenn

That Council:-

1.       Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 ADOPTS Amendment No. 174 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to rezone Lot 9 (4) and Lot 1057 (6) Salcott Road, Girrawheen from ‘Residential’ to ‘Private Clubs and Recreation’;

2.       Pursuant to Regulation 35 (2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 174 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a Standard Amendment, for the following reasons:

a)   The amendment is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area (Metropolitan Region Scheme);

b)   The amendment would have a minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment;

c)   The amendment is not considered to align with the criteria applicable for ‘basic’ and ‘complex’ amendments, prescribed in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015;

d)   The proposed amendment does not result in any significant environmental, social, economic or governance impacts on land in the scheme area; and

e)   The proposed amendment is not a complex or basic amendment.

3.       Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 174 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority; and

4.       Subject to approval from Environmental Protection Authority:

a)   NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning Commission of its intent to advertise Amendment No. 174 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and

b)   ADVERTISES Amendment No. 174 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 42 days pursuant to Regulation 47(2) and 47(4) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              DA2018/509 – 19/58222

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       5         

Moved Cr Newton, Seconded Cr Aitken

That Council:-

1.        Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2, and under the provisions of the Metropolitan Region Scheme, APPROVES the Application for Development Approval (DA2018/509), as shown in Attachment 3, for Industry – Extractive and Bulk Earthworks at Lot 503 (398) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup, subject to the following conditions:

Term of Approval

a)      Subject to the following paragraphs (i) to (iii), this approval shall be valid for a total period of 10 years from the date of approval, consisting of two consecutive five year periods from the date of issue:

i)       At least 12 months (but not more than 18 months) prior to the end of the first five year period of this approval, the landowner shall submit to the City of Wanneroo a report (Compliance Report) outlining compliance with the conditions subject to this approval.

ii)      With the aid of the Compliance Report, Administration shall within six months of receiving the Compliance Report, review the landowner’s compliance with these conditions (including compliance with any associated plan, permit or direction).

iii)     If Administration forms the view (acting reasonably) that the Compliance Report is satisfactory, or if Administration does not complete their review within six months of receiving the Compliance Report, the second five year period of this approval will commence from the later date of either:

·        The expiry of the first five year period; or

·        The date six months from when the Compliance Report is submitted.

b)      The second five year period of this approval will not commence if a Compliance Report is not provided;

c)      If Administration forms the view under Condition (a)(ii) above (acting reasonably) that the Compliance Report is unsatisfactory or that the landowner’s compliance report with these conditions is unsatisfactory:

i)       Administration shall as reasonably as possible inform the landowner in writing of the matters considered to be unsatisfactory.

ii)      If those matters are addressed by the landowner to the satisfaction of Administration (acting reasonably) prior to the expiry of the first five year period, then the second five year period will commence in accordance with Condition (a)(iii) above.

iii)     Otherwise, the second five year period referred to in Condition (a) above will not commence unless further development approval is sought and obtained and all structures, plant, machinery, equipment and other material erected on Lot 503 (398) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup pursuant to this approval shall be removed and the site shall be rehabilitated as outlined in this approval.

Lapse Period

d)      Notwithstanding Conditions (a) and (b) above, if the development the subject of this approval is not substantially commenced within a period of 24 months from the date of approval, the approval shall lapse and be of no further effect. Where an approval has lapsed, no further development shall be carried out without the further approval of the City having first been sought and obtained;

 Boundaries of the Disturbance Area

e)      With the exception of vehicular access, all clearing of vegetation and operations relating to this approval shall be confined within the ‘Lot 503 Phase 1 Application Boundary’ (the Disturbance Area), as indicated on Plan ‘A’ of Attachment 3. No other areas of Lot 503 (398) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup shall be utilised in a manner subject to this approval without the further development approval of the City;

f)      A 20 metre buffer shall be maintained between the boundary of Bush Forever site 293 and any excavation activity (including batters) on the subject site;

g)      Only Bulk Earthworks shall take place within the portion of the subject site which is designated as Service Industrial under ASP 17, and depicted on Plan ‘A’ of Attachment 3. No Industry – Extractive activities are to take place within this area;

Staging Plan

h)      With reference to the excavation staging plan in Plan ‘B’ of Attachment 3, the first five years of excavation shall commence on the eastern boundary and move west;

Hours of Operation

i)        The hours of operation for the approved development shall be from 6.30am– 6pm Monday to Friday and 7am to 5pm Saturday. The approved development shall not operate on Sundays or Public Holidays; 

Environmental Management Plan

j)       Development on the subject site shall comply in all respects and at all times with the Environmental Management Plan (entitled Planning Consent Application and dated 28 March 2018). In the event of any inconsistency between the conditions of this approval and the Environmental Management Plan, the conditions of this approval will prevail to the extent of any inconsistency;

k)      Any cutting, grinding, chipping or mulching of vegetation to be utilised for  soil stabilisation or dust suppression on the site shall at all times occur within the Disturbance Area. Unless agreed to in writing by Administration, material not utilised on the site for soil stabilisation and dust suppression shall be disposed of at a landfill site that is acceptable to Administration;

l)       Development is to comply with the Neerabup Industrial Area Bushfire Management Plan, prepared by Strategen and dated June 2017;

m)     An amended Dust Management Plan is to be provided to the City for approval, prior to the commencement of development. The Dust Management Plan in to address the following to the satisfaction of the City:

i.       Perimeter bunds made from overburden are to be hydro-mulched and seeded as soon as practical;

ii.      Screening to be provided along the southern lot boundary;

iii.     Installation of heavy duty wheel wash prior to the commencement of development; and

iv.     Surrounding roads to be swept clean at the end of each day wherever sand is visible.

   The development is to then operate in accordance with the approved Dust       Management Plan;

Predictive Contour Plan and Rehabilitation Plan

n)      By 31 July 2019 and thereafter by 31 July on each subsequent year, the applicant/landowner shall submit a Predictive Contour Plan, to illustrate the intended depth and direction or excavation and extent of rehabilitation in the coming 12 month period;

o)      The Disturbance Area shall be progressively rehabilitated when final contour levels and grades for each stage are achieved and within 12 months of the closure of each stage;

p)      Within six months following the expiration of this approval the landowner shall provide the City a detailed feature and contour survey of the site, and a geotechnical, compaction and stabilisation certification of the excavated floor of each stage;

Ancillary Facilities

q)      All ancillary facilities, such as (but not limited to) ablution and lunchroom facilities shall be provided on site prior to the commencement of operations;

Access

r)      Access to Lot 503 (398) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup shall only be from Flynn Drive where indicated on the site plan;

          Excavation Plan

s)      Development on the subject site shall comply in all respects and at all times with Attachment 3. In the event of any inconsistency between the conditions of this approval and Attachment 3, the conditions of this approval will prevail to the extent of any inconsistency;

Groundwater Separation

t)       Excavation shall not occur where the surface level will have a vertical separation distance of less than (whichever is greater):

i.       1.2 metres from the average annual maximum groundwater level; or

ii.      2.0 metres from the groundwater contours shown in the Water and Rivers Commission Groundwater Atlas; or

iii.     Any vertical separation as prescribed by the Department of Water or the City.

u)      Excavation shall not continue if at any stage it becomes reasonably apparent to the landowner or to the Manager Approval Services that to proceed would be detrimental to groundwater;

Noise Management

v)      If at any time compliance with the  Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 cannot be maintained, the operations on site shall immediately cease until such time that operations can comply with the aforementioned Regulations;

Complaints and Annual Report

w)     The landowner shall keep a complaints log in which the following is to be recorded:

i.       The date and time, where relevant, of each compliant made and received;

ii.      The means (telephone, email or mail) by which the complaint was made;

iii.     Any personal details of the complainant that were provided or, if no details were provided, a note to that effect;

iv.     The nature of the complaint (including a description of the operations and the equipment to which the complaint relates);

v.      The steps or actions taken in, and the timing of, the response to each complaint, including the follow up contact with the complainant; and

vi.     If no actions or steps were taken in relation to the complaint/enquiry, the reason(s) why no actions or steps were taken.

x)      By 31 July each year, a report (Annual Report) shall be submitted to the City that includes, in response of the period from 1 July to 30 June of the year in question:

i.       The progress of the excavation activities;

ii.      Production levels;

iii.     The progress of rehabilitation undertaken and completed;

iv.     The measures taken to suppress and minimise dust;

v.      The measures taken to suppress and minimum noise;

vi.     The number and types of community complaints and responses, and whether and how much complaints have been resolved; and

vii.    Results of noise, dust and bore monitoring.

Miscellaneous

y)    All activities pertaining to any vehicle or equipment wash-down or servicing shall be confined to a wash down area with a pollutant trap within the Disturbance Area, which shall be provided before vehicle or wash-down or servicing commences on the site;

z)    No explosives shall be stored on Lot 503 (398) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup and no blasting shall be carried out without the written approval of the Manager Approval Services; and

            aa)  The landowner is to erect and maintain a perimeter security fence around the Disturbance        Area.

2.   ADVISES the submitters of Council’s determination; and

3.   ADVISES the applicant that it is their responsibility to comply with all other applicable legislation and obtain all the required approvals, licences and permits prior to development.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              DA2018/1197 – 19/17579

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       5         

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(c) of the Deemed Provisions of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 REFUSES the development application for a Change of Use from Showroom to Recreation Centre (Pool/ Snooker) at Lot 381 (3/10) Pensacola Terrace, Clarkson, for the following reason:

a)    The proposal is not compatible with the objectives of the Business Zone as listed in Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 – Clarkson Activity Centre as it  is considered an incompatible leisure opportunity, which can create additional social activity out of character with the Business Zone; and

b)    The proposal would be more suitable for the Commercial Zone as it provides a new leisure opportunity that generates day and evening activity.

2.       ENDORSES Administration’s responses to the submissions as provided in Attachment 4; and

3.       ADVISES the submitters of its decision.

Procedural Motion

Moved Cr Driver, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That the Motion be deferred to Administration to investigate similar uses within the area before bringing back to Council.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

File Ref:                                              7942 – 19/34120

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       3         

Moved Cr Fenn, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council ENDORSES Administration’s preliminary response to the Western Australian Planning Commission on the draft Position Statement: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure included as Attachment 3. 

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              30089 – 19/79489

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       4         

Moved Cr Fenn, Seconded Cr Flood

That Council endorses the City of Wanneroo’s response to METRONET in relation to the proposed Planning Control Areas over the Yanchep, Eglinton and Alkimos station precincts, as per Attachment 4.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              3120V03 – 19/29604

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       2         

Moved Cr Newton, Seconded Cr Cvitan   

That Council:-

1.       RECEIVES the updates regarding the State Government’s Wanneroo Road and Ocean Reef Road grade separation project;

2.       NOTES the traffic modelling information provided by Main Roads WA for this project and the potential impact of the grade separation project on local roads; and

3.       REQUESTS the Mayor to write to the Minister for Transport and Planning to require Main Roads WA to:

a)    Consider and address the concerns raised by the community and the City regarding the potential impact of the proposed grade separated interchange at Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road on the local roads and intersections; and

b)    Communicate more frequently with the local community to address their concerns relating to the grade separation project at Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road.

Substantive Motion as Amended

At the request of Cr Miles and with the consent of the Mover and Seconder the following amendment was proposed.  In recommendation 3. following “the words “write to”, insert the words “the Premier of Western Australia and the”.

That Council:-

1.       RECEIVES the updates regarding the State Government’s Wanneroo Road and Ocean Reef Road grade separation project;

2.       NOTES the traffic modelling information provided by Main Roads WA for this project and the potential impact of the grade separation project on local roads; and

3.       REQUESTS the Mayor to write to the Premier of Western Australia and the Minister for Transport and Planning to require Main Roads WA to:

a)    Consider and address the concerns raised by the community and the City regarding the potential impact of the proposed grade separated interchange at Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road on the local roads and intersections; and

         b)    Communicate more frequently with the local community to address their concerns relating to the grade separation project at Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              3120V03 – 19/29753

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       2         

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.       ENDORSES the speed limit reduction within Mariginiup area as proposed by Main Roads WA from default speed limit 110km/h to 70km/h;

2.       REQUESTS Administration advise Main Roads WA of Council's endorsement of this speed reduction in the Mariginiup area;

3.       NOTES the updates from Urban Resources confirming that the alternative route approval has been granted and the intention to commence the sand mining operations in the near future;

4.       NOTES that the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions has undertaken dust assessment and developed plans to minimise the creation of dust on the Silver Road; and

5.       REQUESTS Administration advises the property owners and residents of Mariginiup of its decision.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              3120V03 – 19/40514

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.       NOTES Kingsway Christian College, Ashdale Secondary College and Ashdale Primary School have an established working group; and

2.       REQUEST Administration to write to the School Principals offering support to their initiatives to address the traffic congestion issues within their schools precinct.  

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              30925V01 – 18/548244

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Flood, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 18246 submitted by Ralmana Pty Ltd t/a RJ Vincent & Co for the Construction of Pinjar Road Duplication from Blackberry Drive to Joondalup Drive, Mariginiup for the fixed lump sum price of $3,746,061.68 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              31840 – 19/42422

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Mayor Roberts, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Ralmana Pty Ltd t/a RJ Vincent & Co for Tender No. 18260, for the duplication of Marmion Avenue from Camborne Parkway to Yanchep Beach Road as a Fixed Lump Sum Price of $17,914,702.25 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document.

Carried unanimously

File Ref:                                              35004 – 19/20852

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Sangalli, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.      NOTES that maintenance of beach access ways is proposed to be outsourced by engaging contract resources; and

2.      ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd (NAMS) for Tender 18211, for the Provision of Maintenance Services for Beach Access Ways, for the fixed lump sum price of $88,557 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              5918V03 – 19/52925

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil

Previous Items:                                   CP01-08/18 - Library Operational Hours - Sundays - Ordinary Council - 21 Aug 2018 7.00pm      

Moved Cr Newton, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council:-

1.       APPROVES the continuation of the trial of Sunday opening hours of 11.00am to 3.00pm at the Wanneroo Library based on community support for this initiative;

2.       APPROVES the opening of the Clarkson Library on a 12 month trial basis from 11.00am to 3.00pm on Sundays from 1 July 2019 in response to community feedback;

3.       APPROVES adjustment to opening hours on Tuesday evening at Girrawheen Library from an 8.00pm closure to a 5.30pm closure and extend opening hours on Saturday from 12.00pm to 1.00pm, aligning to the Two Rocks Library;

4.       APPROVES the opening of the WLCC Museum on a 12 month trial basis on Sundays from 11.00am to 3.00pm from 1 July 2019 and the adjustment of Thursday closure from 5.00pm to 4.00pm;

5.       NOTES that a further review of all cultural facilities (Museums, Art Gallery, Heritage sites and Libraries) will be undertaken to reaffirm opening hours and resourcing for 2020/21 and beyond; and

6.       NOTES that a communication plan will be developed for the trial of the new opening hours across the City’s Libraries and Museum to inform the community.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              34228 – 19/18972

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil         

Moved Mayor Roberts, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That Council:-

1.       NOTES receipt of the North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study Progress Report;

2.       NOTES the Key Findings resulting from the Phase 2 Needs Assessment analysis as outlined within Section 8 of the Progress Report; and

3.       NOTES the expected completion of the North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study in early May 2019.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              30723V06 – 19/49193

Responsible Officer:                           Director Corporate Strategy & Performance

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       6         

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Fenn

That Council RECEIVES by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the Financial Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to year to date Budget for the period ended 31 January 2019, consisting of:

a)         January 2019 year to date Actuals;

b)         January 2019 year to date Statement of Financial Position and Net Current Assets; and

c)         January 2019 year to date Material Financial Variance Notes.

Carried by absolute majority

11/0

File Ref:                                              36295 – 19/54377

Responsible Officer:                           Director Corporate Strategy & Performance

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Fenn

That Council ADOPTS the 2018/19 Quarter 2 Corporate Business Plan and Financial Performance Report (July – December 2018) as set out in Attachment 1 as recommended by the Audit and Risk Committee.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              36171 – 19/53450

Responsible Officer:                           Director Corporate Strategy & Performance

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       4         

Moved Cr Fenn, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.      ADOPTS the proposed revised Strategic Budget Policy as shown in Attachment 1; and

2.      REPEALS the Setting Fees and Charges Policy.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              1859 – 19/41930

Responsible Officer:                           Director Corporate Strategy & Performance

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Cr Nguyen, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of January 2019, as summarised below:-