Item PS02-05/19  Reconsideration of Development Application (DA2018/736) for a Child Care Centre at Lot 400 (10) Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove

I thank the Director of Planning and Sustainability, Mr. Mark Dickson for his responses to the questions I asked at the Council Meeting on 2nd July. They are recorded in the Minutes of that Meeting and they have raised more questions which we, as residents and ratepayers, need to have clarified.  Rather than quote the entirety of those questions and responses now, I respectfully ask that those minutes be referred to in order to respond to the following.

1.         In addition I request a correction of the Item Reference which should read PS02-05/19- Reconsideration of Development Application (DA2018/736) for a Child Care Centre at Lot 400 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove. Not PS02-07/19 Proposed Amendment No.2 to the Alkimos-Eglinton District Plan No.18.

Response by Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance

The correct item reference for PQ01-07/19 has been changed in the Minutes and re-published on the City’s website.

My original question was why all developments proposed by Hindle Properties Pty Ltd. were not contained within the building envelope as per the DPS2 3.19.4 and 3.19.5 which was to prevail over the general provisions of the scheme.  In his response, the Director confirmed that “Schedule 11 of DPS 2 states that all development must be contained within the building envelope.”

He stated that, if my interpretation of development was accepted, “then a number of complications would arise” “The first would mean that all driveways and vehicle access from the street boundary to the Building Envelope are not permitted, leaving no means of providing vehicle access to dwellings within the building envelope. Any grassed areas, cubby houses,swing sets etc located outside of the building envelope would also be in breach of the Scheme. No clearing such as for firebreaks and secondary access could occur either.”

Further the Director stated that: “If the City were to accept your interpretation it may be found that there are quite a number of properties within the Special Residential Zone in the immediate area that could be considered substantially non-compliant with this interpretation”

2.         Please clarify the above statements in view of the following:

a)         Driveways as defined by State Administration Tribunal in their Judgement WA SAT 143 - August 2017 – are described as an incidental aspect of residential uses

         Response by Manager Approval Services

Administration agrees that driveways are incidental to residential development in that they are a necessary requirement for means of vehicle access to a development. However they are still an aspect of development of a site and are assessed and approved as part of the development approval process.   

In LA ROSA and CITY OF WANNEROO [2017] WASAT 143 the SAT’s decision was in relation to the unauthorised parking of Commercial Vehicles on a Special Rural Property, where the commercial vehicles were parked in the driveway. The SAT determined that the activity was classified as a Transport Depot land use under DPS 2 which is not permitted in the Special Rural Zone. Paragraph 24 of the SAT decision which refers to incidental activities as part of a residence is as follows:

24          The word 'residential' is not defined in DPS 2 or in State Planning Policy 3.1 - Residential Design Codes (Codes). However, cl 1.9.3 of the Scheme states that a word or expression used in the Scheme, but not defined in the Scheme or the Codes, is to have its normal and common meaning. It is commonly accepted that 'residential' in a planning context relates to a residence, in which one resides permanently or for a considerable time: see Derring Lane Pty Ltd v Port Phillip City Council (No 2) [1999] VSC 269. It is further accepted that a person who is entitled to use land for the purpose of a residence may use it for incidental purposes, such as garaging his car or housing his boat: Lizzio v Ryde Municipal Council [1983] HCA 22; (1983) 155 CLR 211. 

LA ROSA and CITY OF WANNEROO [2017] WASAT 143

This is consistent with the City’s approach to dealing with development in the Special Residential Zone where activities that form part of the approved or exempt development (such as a driveway to a single dwelling) although not contained within a Building Envelope are permitted.

b)         DPS2 3.19.3 1. Clearing appears to be covered by the approval for the extent to which is necessary for the construction of the approved building.

Response by Manager Approval Services

Special Residential provisions 3.19.3 (f) and (g) do permit clearing outside the approved building envelope if development approval is first obtained from the City. The Child Care Centre application was supported by a Landscape Survey and Landscape Plan, which includes revegetating the site so that all trees that require removal are replaced. As the proposal does not propose to decrease the amount of vegetation on-site the proposal was considered to meet the intent of provisions (f) and (g) of the Special Residential zone. A condition of approval was included requiring all planting and landscaping to be carried out in accordance with the approved landscaping plan and maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the City.

c)         Firebreaks as I understand are required by the Bushfires Act (1954) on all lots including those that are vacant. Are we to understand that all firebreaks are considered a development?

         Response by Manager Approval Services

The requirement for firebreaks arises from the Bushfires Act (1954). Development approval requirements arise from the Planning and Development Act 2005. Both legislative requirements need to be considered separately and both need to be complied with.  Development approval would not be required in most zones, such as Residential, Commercial, and Industry as they would typically not be required or exempt. However in areas that are subject to special controls, for example the Special Rural and Special Residential Zones, approval for firebreaks typically occurs through the land subdivision approval stage when the lots are first created. A Bushfire Management Plan is implemented as a condition of subdivision approval which is issued by the Western Australian Planning Commission.  Bushfire Management Plans can address a range of strategies in fire prone areas including the provision of fire breaks.

This matter is also addressed in the City’s information sheet titled “PROTECT YOUR HOME AND PROPERTY FROM BUSHFIRES” which is available on the City’s website.  The information sheet specifically addresses this situation and states:

“Owners and occupiers of Special Rural and Special Residential land should be aware of their responsibilities to take bush fire prevention measures, while ensuring they do not contravene Town Planning Scheme provisions which control the removal of vegetation in these zones.” 

3.         With regard to the Directors second statement above:

a)         Schedule 11 and the accompanying provisions did not apply to these lots before 29 May 2018.

          Response by Manager Approval Services

This is incorrect as prior to 29 May 2018 these provisions were contained within Schedule 14 of DPS2. Amendment 149 made a minor amendment to the Special Residential 2 Description of Locality and did not alter the Special Provisions.  

b)         Has the City made Schedule 11 retrospective and why did the City seek to identify these lots and alter the provisions if they now need re-interpretation?

         Response by Manager Approval Services

The provisions are not retrospective as they were already in place over the area prior to 29 May 2018. Refer to response to 3 (a).

4.         The proposed Child Care Centre has a hardstand carpark immediately adjacent to the approved building envelope and larger than the approved building.  How would this development be classified?  Surely it can’t be described as an incidental aspect to residential living?

Response by Manager Approval Services

The approved development is a Child Care Centre. The car parking is part of the Child Care Centre land use and is not a separate or incidental land use.

5.         Ref: DPS2 3.19 THE SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE

(d) ONLY one dwelling (a single house) shall be permitted on each lot – I refer to the SAT decision La Rosa versus The City of Wanneroo – DR 6 2017.  State Administrative Tribunal dismissed a review of the City of Wanneroo’s decision to refuse a development application by Guiseppe and Rosina La Rosa – WA SAT 143 August 2017.

In reference to the above SAT made particular point of defining the word ONLY, and I quote Page 10 of the Judgement:  “21 The identification of specific land uses in SR7 is consistent with subclause 3.18.4 a) of the Scheme. The use of the word 'only' avoids any doubt and established the exclusivity of the specified land uses.”

The Tribunal came to the conclusion that it was not necessary to consider the merits of the proposal, however, the Tribunal was of the view the proposal would not be approved as the scale of the development applied for was inconsistent with the intent and objectives of the Special Rural zone and would adversely impact on the amenity of the locality and the rural character of the SR7.

Can the Director of Planning & Sustainability assure residents that the Discretionary Approval of Hindle’s proposal was subject to the same scrutiny by The City of Wanneroo as was the La Rosa refusal by State Administrative Tribunal? Not forgetting that a Special Rural Zone is also impacted on re the intent and objectives as above.

Response by Manager Approval Services

In that decision, the provision that only one dwelling (Single House) may be permitted on each lot was in reference to clarifying that ‘Grouped Dwellings’ were not permitted being an X (not permitted) land use in the Special Residential and Special Rural zones. That provision does not affect the consideration of other uses that are able to be approved in the zone, such as Child Care Centre, as in the case of No. 10 Harbour Elbow Banksia Grove. Table 1 of DPS 2 sets out the land use permissibility in each zone, where Child Care Centre is listed as a “D” use in the Special Residential Zone.

With reference to the SAT decision La Rosa v City of Wanneroo (CoW), it was determined that the parking of Commercial Vehicles was not incidental to the residential use of the property. For this reason the proposal was considered to meet the definition of ‘Transport Depot’ which is listed in Table 1 of DPS 2 as an “X” use in the Special Rural Zone and is not capable of approval. A Child Care Centre however, is a D (Discretionary) land use in the Special Residential zone and therefore is capable of approval.

In this respect the matters to be considered in La Rosa v City of Wanneroo are not comparable to the proposal at 10 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove as that was dealing with a use that is not permitted in a different zone. 

The application for a Child Care Centre at No. 10 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove was determined by Council and was not subject of a hearing and determination by the State Administrative Tribunal. The City’s assessment and that of the SAT should be the same. When the SAT makes a determination they are to have regard to all of the same provisions and standards that bind the City.

NOTE:  At the meeting, Mayor Roberts confirmed that the Director of Planning and Sustainability would respond to Mrs O’Brien’s questions within two days of the meeting and that Mrs O’Brien could take the opportunity to meet with the Director to discuss all of her questions at a mutually convenient time.

PS07-07/19 Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 – various Modifications Affecting the Special Residential Zone

This evening Elected Members will be asked to consider a recommendation to amend the local planning scheme by modifying the permissibility of cattery, childcare centre and consulting room from discretionary “D” land use to not permitted “X” land use in the Special Residential Zone.  Sadly this action comes too late for those people who asked questions, presented deputations, lodged submissions and raised concerns both before and after a childcare centre was approved for development at 10 Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove which is in a Special Residential Zone.  I draw attention to the City’s submission in respect of the review of the Local Government Act 1995.  Under the heading “Community Engagement” the City’s submission indicates that local governments should be required to engage with the community in the circumstances of “d” planning matters and added a comment “D” certain matters based on impact to the community. 

1.         The Banksia Grove example shows that childcare centres do impact the community and for that reason ask why the City’s current revision of Local Planning Policy 2.3 Chidcare Centres upon which public comment closed today, does not include any requirement for public consultation on applications for development of a childcare centre when the Policy as it currently stands, devotes the whole of Clause 10 to this requirement.  Will the requirement for public consultation be reinstated in the revision?

Response by Mayor Roberts

For the record, the Council refused the childcare centre in Banksia Grove then it went to appeal to SAT and then came back to the Council.

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

The requirement for public consultation is set out in DPS2, there is no need to repeat the consultation requirements in a local planning policy and on that basis, administration is recommending that section be removed.  That does not obviate the need for public consultation still to be undertaken in accordance with the Scheme’s requirements.

2.         In some of the other planning policies, it does refer to other parts of government legislation, whether it be State or Local, that override or work in conjunction with these, can that also be incorporated in this local planning policy regarding childcare that there will be reference to such things?

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

The draft local planning policies are currently out for consultation.  All responses received in relation to that policy will be assessed with the intent of then preparing a report for Council’s consideration in terms of whether any changes need to be made in light of that public consultation. 

PS05-07/19 Current Initiatives Affecting North Wanneroo

The current water crisis and proposed cuts to water licences of 10% without any compensation and without any guarantee of future cuts needs to be addressed.  This is having a huge impact on the farming communities, with property values going down already and is causing equity problem as the banks won’t lend money, which is affecting growth and investment.  If the cuts go ahead this will affect incomes and the ability to pay existing loans.  Thank you to the City in its efforts to reject the recommendations. 

1.         What is the City’s forward planning for its land use and for economic strategic development in the area?

Response by Manager, Advocacy & Economic Development

Question taken on notice.

Further Response by Manager, Advocacy & Economic Development

In terms of forward planning for the area, the City will prepare an Issues Paper on the North Wanneroo area that will be substantially informed by the current public consultation on the Agribusiness Position Paper. The Issues Paper will inform how the North Wanneroo area is included in the development of the Local Planning Strategy. Once the land use parameters for the area are developed through this process, the likely economic development outcomes will be known.

2.         The farmers are united in saying either do not take any water away from their licences or if that is not possible then sensible sub-division of part of the area must be allowed.  If taking water away rezoning must be done so the remaining land can have 100% of its water and be economically viable.  Is that included in the City’s strategy going forward?

Response by Manager, Advocacy & Economic Development

Question taken on notice with regard to planning issues.  The City’s position in terms of Agribusiness is quite clear in the draft position paper that is currently out for consultation.  Input is sought from all of the stakeholders into that so the City’s position on Agribusiness can be finalised and the City certainly does not agree with the proposed 10% water cut. 

Response by Director, Planning & Sustainability

With regard to the planning issues raised, as covered in pages 3 and 4 of the report on tonight’s Agenda, the City is in the process of preparing a local planning strategy and the new local planning scheme. 

One of the key issues that we will need to consider and address looking forward is the future of the north Wanneroo area and what options are available from a planning perspective that exist within that area.  That will involve preparing an Issues Paper for which there will be community consultation.

Further Response by Manager, Advocacy & Economic Development

The proposed water cuts are not yet official. More information on this will be provided when the draft Gnangara Water Allocation Plan is released by the State Government. If the water cuts become official, it is expected that the viability of the North Wanneroo area for agribusiness will be severely impacted and this could potentially trigger a review of the zoning in the area.

3.         Could the interchange at Lukin Drive have a connecting road to Wanneroo Road East?  

Response by Director, Assets

Regarding the Mitchell Freeway extension scope of works, in discussions with Main Roads the scope is fixed and will not be altered.  The City hasn’t considered that scope yet but in our consideration it can be looked at and if possible try to influence that scope.  It is State Government’s decision on the overall scope of the project. 

Moved Cr Treby, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 2 July 2019 be confirmed.

Carried Unanimously

Moved Cr Treby, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That the minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on 28 June 2019 be confirmed.

Carried Unanimously

It is with regret that I advise Council of the resignation of Cr Dennis Hayden due to health and bereavement issues.  I am sure you will all join me in extending our sincere thanks to Cr Hayden for his commitment, his dedication and his years of service to the community of the City of Wanneroo and we wish Cr Hayden well.  Cr Hayden asked me to extend his sincere thanks of support from the Elected Members of the City of Wanneroo and the CEO, Directors and staff for support given to him on his time of Council.  It is with a great deal of sadness that I advise you of Cr Hayden’s decision. 

Following on from Mr Zagar’s question regarding Lukin Drive, has any economic value been looked at as far as Lukin Drive being extended through to Wanneroo Road?

Response by Manager, Advocacy & Economic Development

That has not been looked into as a specific project but that can be done and possibly form part of a submission to that project.  The City will investigate the economics of that possible addition to the project and advise Main Roads accordingly.

Why is the business case recommendation to come back in November, why would it not be moved along faster?

Response by Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance

There is still more information to be gathered for the second stage of the business case and further consultation will be undertaken.  Updates can be provided to the Working Group in November but the Council report will probably be early next year.

File Ref:                                              34265 – 19/253533

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Miles

That Council:-

1.       REQUESTS the Mayor to write to the Minister for Agriculture and Food seeking the Minister’s assurance that the detailed study that is proposed to be undertaken for the establishment of a new agri-precinct in State Forest 65 will include consideration of use of recycled water by the growers in the existing North Wanneroo agricultural area; and

2.       ENDORSES the Chief Executive Officer making a submission to the Legislative Council’s Standing Committee on Public Administration Inquiry into Private Property Rights, requesting that the Inquiry considers property rights associated with government issued groundwater licenses, and the disparity which currently exists between compensation rights in this State and the eastern States.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              36981 – 19/173751

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       4         

Moved Cr Treby, Seconded Cr Zappa

That Council:-

1.         Pursuant to Regulation 50(3) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUPPORTS Amendment No. 174 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, WITHOUT MODIFICATION;

2.         Pursuant to Regulation 53(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and subject to Item 1. above, PROVIDES the advertised Amendment No. 174 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission together with this Report for its consideration (including all attachments);

3.         ADVISES the submitters of its decision; and

4.         AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL Amendment No. 174 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              38398 – 19/261009

Responsible Officer:                           Director Planning and Sustainability

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Cvitan, Seconded Cr Newton

That Council:-

1.       PREPARES Amendment No. 180 to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, to amend the local planning scheme by:

a)    Modifying the permissibility of the following land uses from discretionary (‘D’) to not permitted (‘X’) in the Special Residential Zone:

i.    Cattery

ii.   Child Care Centre

iii.  Consulting Room

b)    Deleting Special Residential No. 6 from Schedule 11;

2.       Pursuant to Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a Complex Amendment for the following reason:

An amendment that is not addressed by any local planning strategy.

3.       Pursuant to Regulation 37(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUBMITS two (2) copies of the Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration;

4.       Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 REFERS Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority;

5.       Subject to approval from the Environmental Protection Authority and the Western Australian Planning Commission, ADVERTISES Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 60 days pursuant to Regulation 38 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and

6.       NOTES that a further amendment to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 will be presented to Council’s 27 August 2019 Meeting, to address administrative errors that have inadvertently resulted in District Planning Scheme No. 2 prescribing land use permissibility of ‘holiday accommodation’ as discretionary (‘D’) in the General Rural, Special Rural, Special Residential and Landscape Enhancement Zones.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              2409V02 – 19/252912

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       6         

Moved Cr Zappa, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That Council ADOPTS the revision of the Local Area Traffic Management Policy and Pathways Policy as shown in Attachments 1 and 4.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              38064 – 19/262772

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       4         

Moved Cr Sangalli, Seconded Cr Newton

That Council:-

1.       ENDORSES the submission of the following City of Wanneroo projects for funding consideration as part of the 2020/21 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs:

a)      Mirrabooka Avenue/Rawlinson Drive intersection (Roundabout), Alexander Heights – Pre-deflections on north and south approaches;

b)      Caporn Street, SLK 0.40 to 2.30, Wanneroo - Reconstruct Shoulders, Upgrade Drainage and install new line marking;

c)      Marmion Avenue/Santa Barbara Parade, Quinns Rocks – Southbound acceleration Lane;

d)      Kingsbridge Boulevard/Camborne Parkway/Shelford Boulevard, Butler – Pre-deflections  on east and west approaches; and

2        NOTES that the Long Term Capital Works Program will require amendment to reflect the funding of projects approved through the 2020/21 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              6923 – 19/271856

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil         

Moved Cr Zappa, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council ENDORSES the submission of the following projects to Main Roads WA for grant funding consideration as part of the 2020/2021 Metropolitan Regional Road Program: -

1.       Road Improvement Projects:-

2.       Road Rehabilitation Projects:-

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              34171 – 19/225463

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Sangalli, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.       NOTES Petition PT03-06/19, tabled at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 4 June 2019;

2.       NOTES that Connolly Drive duplication, between Lukin Drive to Beneden Avenue, is an approved project under Metropolitan Regional Road Program;

3.       REQUESTS Administration to liaise with Main Roads WA through the approval process for signs and line marking to ensure that an appropriate speed limit is implemented at the completion of Connolly Drive duplication works between Lukin Drive to Benenden Avenue; and

4.       Requests Administration to advise the petition organisers of Council’s decision.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              24985V03 – 19/254729

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       1         

Moved Cr Sangalli, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council ACCEPTS the tenders submitted by Miracle and Active Discovery for the separable portions as per table below, for Tender No. 19063 for the Park Asset Renewal Program 2019/20, for their respective lump sum prices as per the General Conditions of Tendering:

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              23757 – 19/262488

Responsible Officer:                           Director Assets

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       2         

Moved Cr Sangalli, Seconded Cr Coetzee

That Council:-

1.          NOTES that appeals have been submitted to the Appeal Convener against the clearing permit CPS 7982/1seeking to clear native vegetation to construct Halesworth Park, Butler – new sports facilities;

2.          NOTES that Administration is liaising with the Appeals Convener to ensure an early conclusion of the appeals process;

3.          NOTES that Administration is liaising with all stakeholders including the Department of Education to determine alternate arrangements for the new school as the construction of the southern oval at Halesworth Park (as a joint use facility) is now unlikely to be completed before the commencement of the 2020 school year; and

4.          DELEGATES, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer, the authority to DETERMINE and ACCEPT or REJECT Tender No. 19062, for Provision of Major Works Halesworth Park, Butler – New Sports Facilities.

Carried BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITy

11/0

File Ref:                                              35610 – 19/266119

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Mayor Roberts, Seconded Cr Treby

That Council:-

1.       APPROVES a Multicultural Festival to be added to the City’s 2019/20 Events Program, to be held on 26 January 2020;

2.       APPROVES the Wanneroo Presents Concert to be removed from the City’s 2019/20 Events Program;

3.       NOTES that a Communications Plan will be developed and implemented to inform the community of changes to the City’s Events Program; and

4.       NOTES that the City’s Multicultural Advisory Group and Reconciliation Action Plan Working Group will be invited to contribute to the ongoing planning and implementation of the proposed Multicultural Festival.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              32947 – 19/255200

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       4         

Moved Cr Driver, Seconded Cr Sangalli

That Council:-

1.       CONSIDERS the Dalvik Park Sports Amenities Building as shown in Attachment 2 of this report;

2.       NOTES the schedule proposed for Detailed Design in 2020/21 and Construction in 2021/22;

3.       ENDORSES the use of Dalvik Park as an active reserve;

4.       NOTES the requirement for temporary facilities at Dalvik Park to be listed for future consideration; and

5.       RECOGNISES and THANKS the community for its involvement in the community consultation component of the project.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              29241 – 19/258743

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       5         

Moved Cr Treby, Seconded Cr Driver

That Council:-

1.       APPROVES the revised Circuses & Performing Animals Policy as per Attachment 1;

2.       APPROVES the revised Deductible Gift Recipient Status Policy as per Attachment 4;

3.       APPROVES an extension of the review date for the Arts Management and Development Policy to 10 December 2019;

4.       APPROVES an extension of the review date for the Sports Floodlighting Policy to 10 December 2019; 

5.       APPROVES an extension of the review date for the Social Media Guidelines Policy to 10 December 2019; and

6.       APPROVES an extension of the review date for the Civic Functions, Ceremonies and Receptions Policy to 10 December 2019. 

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              35710 – 19/242801

Responsible Officer:                           Director Community and Place

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       3         

Moved Cr Treby, Seconded Cr Zappa

That Council:-

1.       APPROVES the advertising of the draft Girrawheen/Koondoola Local Area Plan as per Attachment 2 and the draft Yanchep/Two Rocks Local Area Plan as per Attachment 3 for public comment for a period of 21 days;

2.       NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council following the conclusion of the public comment period to consider final adoption of the Girrawheen/Koondoola and Yanchep/Two Rocks Local Area Plans.

Carried Unanimously

File Ref:                                              1859 – 19/260340

Responsible Officer:                           Director Corporate Strategy & Performance

Disclosure of Interest:                         Nil

Attachments:                                       Nil       

Moved Cr Zappa, Seconded Cr Cvitan

That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of June 2019, as summarised below:-