A G E N D A

Item 1 Attendance

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item 3 Reports

Planning and Development

Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans

1. Amendment To Regent Waters (South) Agreed Structure Plan – Backshall Place, Wanneroo

File Ref: 01311

File Name: BARegWat.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by tpd Date 30 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 4

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of an amendment to the Regent Waters (South) Agreed Structure Plan.

Applicant	Roberts Day Group
Owner	Department for Planning and Infrastructure, R Duffy, C E Duffy Nominees Pty Ltd, K and P Oakley
Location	Lots 3, 110 and 200 Backshall Place, Wanneroo
Site Area	10.5572 hectares
MRS Zoning	Urban
DPS 2 Zoning	Residential

Background

On 24 November 1998, the Joint Commissioners adopted a Structure Plan for Regent Waters (South), relating to the land bounded by Ocean Reef Road, Calabrese Avenue, Yellagonga Regional Park and the developed Regent Waters (North) estate (refer Attachment 1). The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) subsequently adopted the plan as an Agreed Structure Plan (ASP).

The ASP made provision for Residential zoning over this land. Due to the multiple land ownership, rather than creating 10% Public Open Space (POS) in each landholding, the ASP made provision for three large POS areas within the ASP area.

As this would result in some landowners providing more than 10% POS and others less than 10% POS within their landholdings, the ASP made provision for a mechanism to compensate those who would provide surplus POS. Attachment 2 depicts the POS schedule, indicating those lots with a shortfall or surplus.

The Roberts Day Group, acting on behalf of the owners of Lot 3 and 110 Backshall Place, sought subdivision approval from the WAPC. As a referral agency, the City did not support the subdivision design as it did not conform to the ASP. The applicant has therefore proposed an amendment to the ASP.

Detail

The proposed amendment has been submitted on behalf of the owners of Lots 3 and 110 and relates to the entire portion of the ASP area to the south of Backshall Place, being Lots 3, 110 and 200. These lots are identified by the ASP as being Precinct C. The proposal seeks to redesign the road layout and redistribute the POS areas within this precinct (refer Attachment 3).

The ASP makes provision for 1.0557 hectares of POS within Precinct C, which represents 10% of the land area. The entire POS is however currently located within Lots 3 and 110. Under the revised plan, Lot 3 would have a surplus POS of 876 m² and Lot 110 a shortfall of 876 m². Lot 200 would have its full 10% POS area of 2907m². The proposed redistribution does not affect the total extent of the POS required for Precinct 3 (refer Attachment 4).

Consultation

Under Clause 9.7 of the DPS2, public notification of a proposed amendment to the ASP can be waived if the amendment is considered to be of a minor nature which does not materially alter the intent of the ASP. In this instance the owner of Lot 200 (Department for Planning and Infrastructure) has advised that it supports the amended plan. On this basis and as the proposed amendments are considered to be of a minor nature which do not materially alter the intent of the ASP, public notification of this amendment is not considered necessary.

Comment

The applicant has amended the ASP by locating the POS areas taking into account the remnant native vegetation in this area. The POS proposed within Lot 200 would also retain some of the significant trees. The modified road network is robust and permeable and would provide easy access to the POS and the nearby bus routes.

The amendments are considered reasonable and are therefore supported.

Statutory Compliance

Under the provisions of Clause 9.7 of the DPS2, Council may amend an ASP subject to the approval of the WAPC.

Strategic Implications

The proposal is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal under the City’s Strategic plan which seeks to provide for quality services and infrastructure.

Policy Implications

The proposed road layout of the modified ASP satisfies the City’s Uniform Fencing Policy whereby more than 50% of the residential component fronting Ocean Reef Road is served by a service road.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2 DETERMINES that the amendments to the Regent Waters (South) Agreed Structure Plan as submitted by the Roberts Day Group are satisfactory.

2. WAIVES the public notification of the amendments to the structure plan, as it considers them to be of a minor nature which do not materially alter the intent of the structure plan.

3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6 of District Planning Scheme No 2 ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the amended structure plan and FORWARDS it to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 4

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

2. Amendment To East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (Madeley And Darch)

File Ref: 49020

File Name: BAProAm6.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 4

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of a proposed amendment to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (LSP) as it relates to Part Lot 2 Wanneroo Road, Madeley.

Applicant	Drescher and Associates
Owner	Carnarvon Tourist Centre Pty Ltd
Location	Part Lot 2 Wanneroo Road, Madeley
Site Area	2.0822 hectares
MRS Zoning	Urban
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development

Background

The East Wanneroo Cell 6 LSP was adopted by Council on 18 December 2002 (Item PD06-12/01) and has been sent to the Western Australian Planing Commission for adoption and certification.

The LSP designates Part Lot 2 Wanneroo Road as Residential (R20) and for public open space purposes. The lot is 2.0822 hectares in area and is located approximately 200 metres north of the intersection of Kingsway and Wanneroo Road (refer Attachment 1). The site currently contains the Lush-Gro Nursery.

The site is situated between two developing residential estates to the north (Patanal Pty Ltd) and south (Australand Pty Ltd). The estate to the north is currently under construction and the estate to the south has been developed within approximately 70 metres from Part Lot 2.

The site originally formed part of an application to subdivide Lots 2-6 Wanneroo Road, Madeley (which incorporated the two developing estates to the north and south of this site) for residential purposes in a form generally consistent with the current LSP (refer Attachment 2). The subdivision application was submitted by Development Planning Strategies, on behalf of Australand Pty Ltd (with the consent of the current owner of Part Lot 2) and was approved by the WAPC on 21 March 2001. Subsequent to subdivision approval, negotiations between Australand Pty Ltd and the owners of Part Lot 2 broke down. The landowners of Part Lot 2 no longer wish to participate in the Australand subdivision and are now seeking to vary the LSP as it relates their lot, to facilitate a medium density development site (refer Attachment 3).

The landowners have indicated that an alternative layout has been prepared to enable the sale of the land to facilitate the relocation of the nursery use to another more appropriate location.

Detail

The proposal seeks to amend the LSP by altering the design to accommodate a grouped housing site of 9082 square metres and to recode the residential component of the lot (except one proposed lot in the south west corner of the site) from R20 to R40 (see Attachment 3). The applicant’s arguments in favour of the proposal are summarised as follows:

1. The site is well located adjacent to the Lake Goollelal Reserve and Wanneroo Road which is a major public transport route and provides access to nearby shopping centres and the City.

2. The R40 coding to the eastern portion of the site is consistent with the City’s approach to creating medium density sites surrounding areas of open space.

3. The proposed road pattern does not affect development of the adjoining landholdings.

4. The plan retains adequate pedestrian and vehicular circulation throughout the locality.

5. A much larger R40 site already exists to the north of this site within the Patanal subdivision.

6. It is the developers intention to orientate development on the group housing site to all road frontages.

7. The road entering the site from the north will be used to provide access to the group housing site.

8. The proposal avoids the need for land exchanges with the landowner to the south.

9. A design concept for the grouped housing site is currently being prepared.

Consultation

Under Clause 9.7 of the DPS2, public notification of a proposed amendment to a structure plan can be waived if the amendment is considered to be of a minor nature which does not materially alter the intent of the structure plan. The applicant has requested that Council consider the proposal as a minor variation and therefore waiver the requirement for notification or alternatively seeks a 14 day advertising period. The applicant has written to the two adjoining landowners requesting any comments be submitted to the City. Both of these landowners have contacted the City to specifically request that public advertising be carried out to ensure that the local residents and developers have a proper opportunity to comment on the proposal. The landowners have indicated opposition to the proposal on the basis that medium density housing opportunities already existing in the vicinity and the impact of the proposal on the adjoining landholdings.

Comment

The principle of providing R40 sites within this lot is generally in keeping with the City’s practice of encouraging medium density housing adjacent to major public transport routes and areas of public open space.

Although the redesign represents a less permeable road configuration, the overall road design identified in the adjoining subdivision approvals is not compromised and the more significant vehicle and pedestrian links are maintained.

The subdivision of the adjoining landholdings can progress in accordance with the existing subdivision approvals and as such, are not considered to be substantially compromised.

Two areas of concern however relate to the termination of a proposed road at the northern boundary of the site and the irregular shape of the group housing site. These concerns could be overcome by extending the proposed road from the north to link with proposed road along the western boundary of Lot 2 and confining the medium density grouped housing site to the eastern side of this link road. The remaining residential land to the west of the link road would remain as R20 housing sites. This change is indicated as dashed lines on Attachment 4.

Statutory Compliance

The amendment to the structure plan will follow the statutory process outlined in Part 9 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council pursuant to Clause 9.7 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2, DETERMINES that:

1. the proposal to amend East Wanneroo Cell 6 Structure Plan as submitted by Drescher and Associates on behalf of Carnarvon Tourist Centre Pty Ltd is not supported due to the termination of the proposed road at the northern boundary of Lot 2 and the irregular configuration of the proposed grouped housing site.

2. the modified plan as contained in Attachment 4 to this report is satisfactory and should be advertised for a period of 28 days.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

3. Proposed Amendment No 16 To District Planning Scheme No 2 To Recode Lot 645 (40) Greville Way, Girrawheen, From R20 To R30

File Ref: 73470

File Name: BAProgre.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by CH Date 01 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 30 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of an application seeking to amend the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2 (DPS2) to recode Lot 645 (40) Greville Way, Girrawheen from R20 to R30.

Applicant	Department of Housing and Works
Owner	Department of Housing and Works
Location	Lot 645 (40) Greville Way, Girrawheen
Site Area	1679m2
DPS 2 Zoning	Residential R20
MRS Zoning	Urban

Background

The subject site is located at the north western end of Greville Way, Girrawheen. Liddell Reserve and Wanneroo Road are located to the west of the site (refer Attachment 1). The site has a land area of 1679m2. Surrounding residential properties are also zoned Residential R20.

In the 1970’s eight bed sit units were constructed on the site. On 17 September 2001, the City issued development approval for conversion of the units into four aged person’s dwellings. This conversion has since been undertaken.

Detail

Under the current R20 coding, the site has a maximum development potential of 3 dwellings. With the 50% density bonus available for aged persons dwellings under the Residential Planning Codes (R-Codes), this potential can be increased to 5 aged persons dwellings. Under the R30 coding, the site will have a maximum development potential of 5 dwellings however, with the same density bonus, this potential can be increased to 7 aged persons dwellings.

The site currently accommodates four aged persons dwellings and if the amendment is successful the applicant intends to develop an additional 2 aged persons dwellings on the vacant portion of the site. A concept plan showing the existing and proposed development is shown on Attachment 2. A formal development approval will be required should the amendment be successful. As the concept plan does not contain sufficient detail for a proper assessment, it should not be afforded any status other than a broad outline of the applicants’ ultimate development intention for the site.

Consultation

Under the provisions of the recently amended Town Planning Regulations, consent to advertise from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is not required if an amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and other state planning policies and strategies. In this instance, the proposal is considered consistent with the urban zoning under the MRS and various WAPC policies which seek to provide for a diverse range of housing types. Should Council resolve to support this amendment, the WAPC’s consent to advertise would not be required.

Comment

The site has already been developed as an aged person’s development with the northern portion of the site being undeveloped. The amendment would facilitate the development of the remaining portion of the site and the concept plan gives a broad outline of the applicant’s development intention for the site. The development would be consistent with the New North Redevelopment Programme, which aims to upgrade and diversify the housing stock in Girrawheen and Koondoola. The site is suitably located adjacent to both a park and Wanneroo Road which is a major public transport route. It is also located within 1km of medical and commercial facilities at Newpark Girrawheen District Centre.

The amendment is also considered appropriate as it would provide a necessary form of accommodation for aged person’s. Aged person’s housing is required in most residential areas in recognition of an increasing percentage of aged residents within the City.

It is noted that spot codings within the City are generally not supported, however in this instance the amendment is considered appropriate. Accordingly support for the proposal is recommended.

Statutory Compliance

The amendment will be processed in accordance with Section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act and the Town Planning Regulations.

Strategic Implications

Provision of aged persons housing is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal under the City’s draft Strategic Plan.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. In pursuance of section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928 (as amended), PREPARES Amendment No 16 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2 to Recode Lot 645 (40) Greville Way, Girrawheen, from R20 to R30.

2. REFERS Amendment No 16 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act.

3. SUBMITS a copy of Amendment No 16 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

4. Adoption Of A Local Structure Plan For Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks

File Ref: 70709

File Name: BAProLoc.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 02 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the adoption of a Local Structure Plan for Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks.

Applicant	Chappell & Lambert Planning Consultants
Owner	Mirvac-Fini
Location	Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks
Site Area	278.5ha
DPS 2 Zoning	Rural Community Zone No 1

Background

Lot 201 is situated on the northern side of Breakwater Drive, approximately six kilometres northeast of the Two Rocks townsite (refer location plan - Attachment 1).

At its meeting on 27 November 2001 (item PD14-11/01), Council considered the draft Local Structure Plan for Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks, and resolved inter alia, to advertise it for public comment subject to the applicant providing a satisfactory Part 1 Statutory Section and modifying the plan to relocate some building envelopes.

Council also identified a number of issues requiring additional information/consideration prior to final adoption of the Structure Plan, as follows:

1. Specialist consultant’s advice on karstic issues and additional provisions in the Karst Management Plan.

2. Consideration of road related matters.

3. Inclusion of additional provisions in the Fauna and Vegetation Management plan.

4. Inclusion of additional provisions in the Drainage Nutrient and Water Management Plan.

5. Inclusion of additional provisions in the Fire Management Plan.

Detail

A copy of the draft Structure Plan is shown on Attachment 2. The key features are as follows:

· The Plan comprises 139 rural residential lots ranging from 1.0ha to 4.5ha in area.

· Each lot has a 2000sqm building envelope located to maximise the retention of significant vegetation.

· Public open space (POS) areas have been provided to protect two significant stands of trees at the northwest and southeast parts of the site. An additional area of POS is located along one of the entry roads to Breakwater Drive, which is also the proposed location of a community purposes site for the development (as required under the Special Provisions).

· Two entry roads from Breakwater Drive.

· A bridle trail network which extends between the subdivisional road network, the POS areas and along the north, east and west boundaries of the land. These also serve as strategic firebreaks and emergency vehicle access points.

· A possible homestore or corner store site is identified on one lot on the main eastern entry road.

· The lots are to be serviced by a reticulated water supply. Sewage disposal is to use aerobic treatment units or modified septic systems.

As part of Council’s consideration of this matter, a number of issues were identified as requiring additional information/consideration prior to final adoption of the LSP. These matters have been subject of discussions between relevant Council officers and the applicants, and together with the additional requirements of State Government agencies resulting from submissions received, the various matters have now been addressed and the Structure Plan documents modified accordingly. Details of agency comments and details of how matters have been addressed are provided in the Comment section of this report.

A copy of the revised Structure Plan incorporating modifications required by Council and the requirements of other State agencies is appended to this report as Attachment 3. A copy of the revised Structure Plan document has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.

Furthermore, Council also required that a consultant be commissioned to provide specialist advice on matters associated with karstic landform issues for the Structure Plan and associated environmental management plans (part 2 of Council’s 27 November 2001 resolution refers). This requirement resulted from assessment feedback from Council officers and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that karstic information required to address the environmental conditions for the land was the domain of a specialist consultant (the City and DEP do not possess the necessary expertise).

The landowner (Mirvac-Fini) commissioned the consultant Logiden Pty Ltd (Dr Brian Logan) to carry out the review of karstic information in accordance with a brief agreed by the City and DEP and with the consultants’ report to be delivered directly to the City and DEP for consideration. The appointment of Dr Logan (who is known to DEP officers) was agreed by both the City and DEP. The Logiden report was submitted in late March 2002.

Consultation

The application has been advertised for public comments for a period of 42 days in accordance with Council’s resolution. It was advertised by means of an on-site sign and an advertisement placed in the Wanneroo Times newspaper. Copies of the Draft Structure Plan were made available for inspection at the City’s Administration Centre and also the Two Rocks library. Relevant government agencies were written to and invited to submit comments. The submission period closed on 25 January 2002. The City received eight submissions from State Government departments/agencies and one public submission.

Comment

Logiden Report on Karstic Landform Issues

City and DEP officers reviewed the Logiden report and met with Dr Logan in April to discuss the report’s findings. The report conclusions were that the works undertaken to date in preparing the Structure Plan and environmental management plans was satisfactory, particularly in respect of the medium to higher risk karstic areas on the western part of the site, and that further drilling and other works (as specified in the Works Schedule for karst analysis forming part of the environmental conditions in DPS2) is unlikely to necessitate any major modifications to the lot layout, boundaries, locations of roads and services, etc. For the identified low-risk areas occupying some ¾ of the overall site, however, the report recommends an additional drilling program (of 15 identified drill sites throughout the eastern part of the site) and preparation of a number of geological maps and logs based on the drilling. The additional works program could occur following approval to the Structure Plan and prior to subdivisional application.

Consequently, it is recommended that the Logiden report be incorporated into the Structure Plan documents, and to enable enforcement of the required works, the recommendations be incorporated into the Part 1 statutory document of the Structure Plan. This now forms part of the revised Structure Plan documentation.

Comments raised in the submissions are outlined below, together with information responding to the comments raised.

Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA)

Comment

FESA indicates Fire Hydrants are to be installed at 400 metre intervals (as prescribed in the final Planning for Bush Fire Protection Policy dated December 2001) and not 500 metres as per the proposed structure plan.

Response

Relevant provisions in the Fire Management Plan and Part 1 Structure Plan document have been modified accordingly.

Aboriginal Affairs Department

Comment

The Department has given advisory information to ensure compliance with the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 during subdivisional works.

Response

A copy of the Department’s letter has been provided to the applicant.

Department for Planning and Infrastructure

Comment 1

The bridle trail in the northwest corner of the estate is to be constructed of a minimum limestone base standard to accommodate emergency fire access.

Response 1

The applicant has agreed that this standard is able to be accommodated, and the WAPC will be able to enforce this requirement at the subdivision application stage.

Comment 2

Laneways in the southeast to be re-examined to accommodate rubbish services, trucks etc.

Response 2

The Structure Plan has been redesigned to delete the laneways by extending the cul-de-sac road to service most of the lots in the southeast portion of the site. Access to only two lots is to be via battleaxe access legs of 5 metres width. An indicative bin bay location is identified on the plan for Lots 40 and 41.

Comment 3

Some of the lots need to be balanced up (to approx 2.5ha) to be of similar size, for example the 4.5ha lot in the southwest to be reduced in size to prevent further subdivision of the lot while increasing the size of the lots abutting it.

Response 3

The Structure Plan has been redesigned to better balance the lot sizes in the southwest part of the site (no lots larger than 2.8ha).

Comment 4

Home Store provisions in the Structure Plan with regard to floor space allocation and inclusion of provisions to guide development being included in the Part 1 document or specify in Part 2 provisions for possible home store, then an amendment to the Structure Plan at a later stage may be appropriate to justify what can be done on the site, as lack of provisions may cause confusion and problems.

Response 4

The Structure Plan has been modified to delete the reference to ‘possible’ homestore or corner store, rather it refers to a corner store with a maximum floorspace of 100sqm NLA to provide certainty.

Comment 5

A significant tree assessment or landscape identification plan being prepared for the site - this should be prepared by the developers botanist in conjunction with the City’s Landscape Architect, with the pegging and tagging of significant trees (to be marked on the plan).

Response 5

Significant tree assessment information has been provided by the applicant in the Fauna and Vegetation Management Plan.

Comment 6

With regard to staging of development, access points need to be fully constructed and preferably roads regardless of staging of development for fire/safety risk management.

Response 6

This matter is able to be addressed through the subdivision approval process.

Comment 7

The community purpose site in the southeast corner may require provisions in the structure plan.

Response 7

The requirement for a 5000sqm community purposes site is listed in the Special Provisions for the land, having been established as a requirement of the WAPC during the rezoning process for the land. The community purpose site has been identified as part of the southern POS area on the Structure Plan. Additional provisions relating to the community purpose site are not considered necessary at this time.

Comment 8

Appropriate fencing and fire breaks should be constructed as part of the subdivision.

Response 8

Provisions in the relevant environmental management plans and the Part 1 document require the installation of fencing to the perimeter of Lot 201 prior to any subdivisional works, together with the installation of the strategic fire break system.

Comment 9

Limit the height and location of dwellings on ridges (specifically in the north west corner) to prevent overlooking and visual intrusion for sites lower down the ridges and from the regional open space.

Response 9

It is considered that formal provisions in the Structure Plan to address this matter are unnecessary given that only a small number of lots would be affected by this, and the low density of development and limited vegetation clearing that would occur in the estate would limit any visual intrusion and overlooking concerns.

Comment 10

Building envelopes are to be identified and marked on the Structure Plan, and positioned away from significant trees on each lot (following significant tree assessment or landscape identification plan) in order to retain as many trees on each lot as possible.

Response 10

The building envelopes have been identified to minimise the disturbance of vegetation (and considering the significant tree assessment already undertaken), and these are marked on the Structure Plan accordingly. In addition, the building envelopes are to be pegged for approval of any tree removal at the time of subdivision

Comment 11

Changes to wording of some of the Part 1 provisions is required.

Response 11

The specified modifications have been made.

DPI also provided verbal confirmation that it currently has no requirement for the road shown on the North West Corridor (Yanchep) Structure Plan of 1993 to pass along the western edge of the subject land. This confirmation was required as part of several road-related matters to be addressed as part of Council’s 27 November 2001 resolution. The several other road matters have been subject of discussions with the applicant and are able to be addressed through the subdivision process.

Water Corporation

The Corporation has no additional comments (previous comments have been addressed).

Department of Conservation and Land Management

Comment

The Department raises no objections to the proposal, however has requested the following matters be incorporated into several of the management plans:

· The strategic firebreaks should be surfaced with compacted limestone to enable better management and fire access to the proposed subdivision. The suggested minimum width for the limestone is 4m.

· In the information to be provided to site construction personnel, it is requested that specific emphasis be given to dieback management and the potential effects of the disease to the vegetation in the area.

· Reference to the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority (no longer a statutory authority) to be replaced with Conservation Commission.

· A Department lock to be placed on gates adjoining State Forest or Bush Forever sites so in the event of an emergency Departmental staff can gain access or egress through these points.

· Confirmation of responsibilities for ongoing weed control and monitoring is required. Due to the urban interface with State Forest and Bush Forever sites there is an increased likelihood of broad scale weed invasion into these areas. An ongoing commitment to monitoring and control of weeds is required.

Response

The matters raised by CALM have been satisfactorily incorporated into the relevant management plans.

Agriculture Western Australia

Comment 1

Some concerns are expressed regarding the keeping of horses on the proposed lots. It is considered that unless a high level of management can be shown and the horse is stabled for the majority of the time and hand fed the majority of lots around l ha would not be able to stock a horse on non-irrigated pasture.

Response 1

The keeping of a maximum of one horse per lot as per Special Provisions for the land was established as part of the Environmental Review and scheme amendment process (Amendment 837 to former TPS1) which was subject of detailed assessment and consultation with the relevant State agencies. General Provision 1.1.2(k) of Schedule 15 of DPS2 also provides that Council may only grant approval to the keeping of a horse on one of these lots if vegetation requiring protection has been suitably fenced to provide such protection.

Comment 2

The Department considers that the Drainage, Nutrient and Water Management Plan does not adequately deal with issues of erosion and sediment loss from the site.

Response 2

It is considered that the relevant management plan does adequately address erosion and sediment loss and has been supported by the Water and Rivers Commission (in its submission prior to advertising of the Structure Plan) and DEP.

Department of Environmental Protection

The Department has confirmed its support for the findings of Logiden’s report on Karst issues associated with the development, subject to the additional works being undertaken prior to subdivision approval. No other concerns have been raised in respect of the Structure Plan and environmental management plans.

Main Roads WA

The draft Structure Plan is acceptable to Main Roads.

Public Submission

Comment 1

The submission expresses disappointment that the option to undertake the Rural Community development has not been chosen. There has been minimal community input in the design and management strategies. There is no provision for community building in the designated POS. If the community were more involved it may relieve the City of maintenance of POS, bridle tracks, irrigation, vegetation protection and fire management under a Rural Community concept, the community could become a self regulating group with a management strategy.

Response 1

These comments probably relate to the fact that the cluster form of subdivision has not been chosen for this Structure Plan. The Special Provisions and Structure Plan provisions will require that the developer initially and the ultimate landowners will have responsibilities for many of the issues raised.

Comment 2

Bushland conservation is noted. The two areas of POS are not connected, the firebreaks and roads also further deplete the vegetation along with karstic drilling and the requirement for low fuel zones.

Response 2

These comments are noted. While the Special Provisions for the land restrict land clearing, it is not possible to undertake the development without some vegetation loss. The identified POS areas are not connected, however were required to be provided to retain the significant stands of trees on the site.

Summary

As noted in the preceding sections of this report, a number of issues were identified as requiring additional information/consideration prior to final adoption of the LSP. These matters have been subject of discussions between relevant Council officers and the applicants, and together with the additional requirements of State Government agencies resulting from submissions received, the various matters have now been addressed and the Structure Plan documents modified accordingly. It is recommended that Council finally adopt the duly modified Structure Plan documents.

Statutory Compliance

The Structure Plan has been assessed in accordance with Clause 9.6 of DPS2.

Strategic Implications

This proposal is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s draft Strategic Plan which refers to the promotion of lifestyle choice.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6 of the City's District Planning Scheme No 2 ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the modified Local Structure Plan for Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks.

2. FORWARDS the modified Local Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Development Applications

5. Proposed Signage Application For Lot 998 (981) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo

File Ref: 33794

File Name: EBLot998.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 1 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To determine an application for one illuminated sign on the eastern façade and two illuminated signs and one sign painted logo on the northern façade of the Video Ezy building located at Lot 998 (981) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo (refer Attachment 1).

Applicant	Wayne Miller Signs
Owner	Kelshore Pty Ltd
Location	Wanneroo
Site Area	0.3993ha
DPS 2 Zoning	Centre

Background

Application was made to the City for various signs on the above mentioned lot, including directional, pylon, panels, flagpoles and menu boards related to the approved developments on the site. The application addressed the eastern elevation (Wanneroo Road) only and was approved on the 22 February 2000 subject to conditions, which were subsequently appealed against by the applicant and upheld by the Minister.

Detail

The proposal depicts two illuminated ‘DVD’ signs measuring 1.2m in height and 1.8m in width, one illuminated ‘Video Ezy’ sign measuring 1.2m in height and 6.0 metres in length and a sign painted logo. The DVD signs are to be positioned on the northeast corner of the building on the facades fronting Wanneroo Road and Church Street, and the Video Ezy sign and sign painted logo are to be positioned on the northern elevation (refer Attachment 2).

Consultation

The application was not formally advertised as the illumination and potential glare from the signs was considered insignificant in the context of the existing street and car park lighting and light emanating from the windows of the building. The City has acknowledged that concerns were raised previously from adjacent landowners in relation to the illuminated signage.

Comment

When considering an application for approval to erect, place or display an advertisement, Council is required to consider the application in light of the objectives of the Scheme, with particular reference to the character and amenity of the locality within which it is to be displayed, including its historic or landscape significance and traffic safety, and the amenity of the adjacent areas which may be affected.

The DVD and Video Ezy sign although illuminated, are setback approximately 19.0 metres from the road frontages of Wanneroo Road and 9.0 metres from Church Street and are considered typical of developments of this type. The illumination and potential glare from the signs is considered insignificant in the context of the existing street and car park lighting and light emanating from the windows of the building. The signage is not proposed to flash and is unlikely to have an adverse impact, causing glare on the nearby residential area. In light of the above, the concerns raised by adjacent landowners were found to be unsubstantiated.

The signage is not perceived to potentially create a distraction to motorists or pedestrians nor detract from the amenity of the area and is considered to meet the objectives of the Scheme, in that it:

· Is unlikely to erode the visual quality and character of the locality or transport corridor;

· Is unlikely to be misleading or dangerous to vehicular or pedestrian traffic;

· is not excessive in terms of the area and impact of the signage commensurate with the realistic needs of commerce;

· is not considered superfluous or unnecessary by virtue of their number, colours, height, prominence, visual impact, size, relevance to the premises on which they are located, number and content;

· does not create clutter; and

· promotes a high standard of design and presentation in outdoor advertising.

The sign painted logo is however considered unnecessary when viewed amongst the existing signage on the eastern façade, the proposed illuminated signs on the northern façade and the previously approved pylon sign. Therefore the application is recommended for approval subject to the deletion of the painted logo on the northern façade.

Statutory Compliance

The proposed illuminated signage is considered to meet the objectives of the Scheme in relation to the control of advertisements and the requirements of the Sign’s Local Law 1999. The sign painted logo, however is considered contrary to the objectives of the Scheme as it is considered unnecessary when viewed amongst the existing signage on the eastern façade, the proposed illuminated signs on the northern façade and the approved pylon sign.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the application submitted by Wayne Miller Signs on behalf of Kelshore Pty Ltd, relating to signage on Lot 998 (981) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo in accordance with the approved plans dated 22 March 2002 subject to the sign painted logo on the northern façade being deleted.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

Subject Lot

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Delegated Authority Reports

6. Development Application Determined By Delegated Authority For April 2002

File Ref: 63346

File Name: FADevApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by hw Date 03 May 2002

Level 3 Approval by hw Date 03 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by hw Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by hw Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Development Applications determined by Planning & Development between 1/04/02 and 30/04/02, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.

Background

Nil

Detail

The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes (R Codes.)

The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures with between 80 to 130 development applications being received per month in addition to an average of 400 to 500 building license applications.

Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to Council Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.

Council Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.

Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1/04/02 and 30/04/02, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Nil

Statutory Compliance

A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 14 August 2001 (item W340-08/01 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning & Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1/04/02 and 30/04/02.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA00/0852.01 18/04/2002 No owners recorded 6 $16,000.00 Approved

Prop address 32 POINTER WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064

Land Lot 675 P 10053 S/P 23920

Description Grouped Dwellings/Renovations & Additions

Applicants ANTHONY P NAUGHTIN

File Number 25465

DA01/1112 31/10/2001 CROWN - VESTED CITY OF WANNEROO 37 $50,000.00 Approved

Prop address QUINNS BEACH SOUTH TOILET/CHANGEROOMS 45L OCEAN DRIVE QUINNS ROCKS

Land PT RES 20561

Description CARPARK & FOOTPATH ACCESS

Applicants SILVERTON LTD

File Number 7095470955

DA01/1140 14/11/2001 MINDARIE KEYS JOINT VENTURE 117 $800,000.00 Approved

Prop address 50 LIGHTHOUSE PARADE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1054 P 24094

Description TWO STOREY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING

Applicants IMPRESSIONS-ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR DESIGNERS

File Number 71050

DA02/0066 18/01/2002 GARRY P JAMES & IAN R JAMES 52 $5,000.00 Approved

Prop address 71 VINCENT ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065

Land Lot 31 P 8404 Vol 66 Fol 181A

Description PLASTIC COVERED IGLOO

Applicants BENARA NURSERIES

File Number 09085

DA02/0067 18/01/2002 QUITO S F PTY LTD 52 $40,000.00 Approved

Prop address 116 VINCENT ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065

Land Lot 17 P 8404 Vol 485 Fol 012A

Description SHADEHOUSE

Applicants QUITO S F PTY LTD, BENARA NURSERIES

File Number 142713

DA02/0076 21/01/2002 BRENDA M BLANCHARD & STEPHEN J BLANCHARD 56 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 GLENGYLE TURN QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 398 DP 27516 Vol 2215 Fol 106

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0093 23/01/2002 SIDERNO MEWS PTY LTD 59 $902,452.00 Approved

Prop address 10 SIDERNO RISE HOCKING WA 6065

Land Lot 167 D 97051 Vol 2173 Fol 396

Description 13 Grouped Dwellings

Applicants SIDERNO MEWS PTY LTD

File Number 61207

DA02/0119 29/01/2002 IFIGENIA MARTINEZ & JOSE MARTINEZ 31 $100,000.00 Approved

Prop address 54 STONEWALL CIRCUIT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 3 DP 29430

Description Two Storey Dwelling

Applicants IFIGENIA MARTINEZ, JOSE MARTINEZ

File Number 19014

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0120 29/01/2002 EVA MARTINEZ, IFIGENIA MARTINEZ, PEDRO 31 $100,000.00 Approved

Prop address 56 STONEWALL CIRCUIT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 2 DP 29430

Description 2 Storey Dwelling

Applicants EVA MARTINEZ, PEDRO MARTINEZ, IFIGENIA MARTINEZ & Others

File Number 18014

DA02/0121 29/01/2002 EVA MARTINEZ & PEDRO MARTINEZ 29 $100,000.00 Approved

Prop address 58 STONEWALL CIRCUIT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1 DP 29430

Description Two Storey Dwelling

Applicants EVA MARTINEZ, PEDRO MARTINEZ

File Number 10014

DA02/0127 29/01/2002 RONALD K WILSON 53 $103,200.00 Approved

Prop address 9 MOREE LANE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 557 DP 26958

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0143 31/01/2002 RAYMOND K COOPER & HELENE M COOPER 18 $97,000.00 Approved

Prop address 6 COVINGTON PROMENADE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 578 DP 27675 Vol 2506 Fol 690

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants RAYMOND K COOPER, HELENE M COOPER

File Number 03014

DA02/0155 04/02/2002 CROWN LAND-CITY OF WANNEROO MANAGEMENT 54 $2,000.00 NotReq

Prop address DRAINAGE-RES 45970 2 KIRKSTALL DRIVE HOCKING WA 6065

Land SWAN LOC 13625

Description ESTATE SIGN

Applicants AUSTRALAND HOLDINGS LTD

File Number

DA02/0214 14/02/2002 TERRY M DAVENPORT & KERRY R DAVENPORT 36 $305,000.00 Approved

Prop address 19 BELIZE WAY MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 430 P 24280 Vol 2201 Fol 133

Description RESIDENCE

Applicants MANOR HOME BUILDERS PTY LTD

File Number 09016

DA02/0236 18/02/2002 KELLY-ANN LAMBERT & WARREN G LAMBERT 32 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 10 WYOLA LANE WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 143 DP 29015 Vol 2511 Fol 018

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0263 27/02/2002 SALVATORE A DE FRANCESCO & VALENTINA DE 15 $200,000.00 Approved

Prop address 4 PLUME COURT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1332 P 24021 Vol 2190 Fol 321

Description Single Storey Dwelling

Applicants SALVATORE A DE FRANCESCO, VALENTINA DE FRANCESCO

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0280 01/03/2002 SEABEAM ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 15 $220,000.00 Approved

Prop address 17 LILAC HILL VISTA MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 218 DP 28993

Description Single Storey Dwelling

Applicants MAURICE DEL BORRELLO

File Number

DA02/0295 07/03/2002 IOAN LUCA & DORINA LUCA 37 $180,000.00 Approved

Prop address 2 BROCKWELL PARKWAY LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1385 P 24321 Vol 2204 Fol 608

Description Two Storey Dwelling

Applicants IOAN LUCA, DORINA LUCA

File Number

DA02/0296 07/03/2002 ADRIAN J TWINE & KATRINA J TWINE 21 $112,535.00 Approved

Prop address 30 BURNETT DRIVE CLARKSON WA 6030

Land Lot 6 DP 29048 Vol 2509 Fol 866

Description Double Garage

Applicants JAXON CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number

DA02/0300 08/03/2002 ESME S VAN ROOYEN & FREDERICK E VAN ROOYEN 21 $164,777.00 Approved

Prop address 7 BOUNTY WAY MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 474 P 24282 Vol 2198 Fol 683

Description DWELLING

Applicants J CORP PTY LTD

File Number 51018

DA02/0307 08/03/2002 SIMON R POLLITT & HELEN REEVES 25 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 883 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 864

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

DA02/0310 06/03/2002 ALESSANDRO V ALESSI & NATALINA ALESSI 23 $100,000.00 Approved

Prop address 40 RAEBURN CRESCENT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1307 DP 29495 Vol 2219 Fol 950

Description Single Storey Dwelling

Applicants C & S COTTONE HOMES

File Number

DA02/0317 11/03/2002 NAMOI LANGLOIS & HAROLD W LANGLOIS 14 $1,200,000.00 Approved

Prop address 47 CLARECASTLE RETREAT MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 2 P 16736 Vol 1934 Fol 393

Description Two Storey Dwelling with ancillary accommodation unit in basement

Applicants HONEST HOLDINGS PTY LTD

File Number 67778

DA02/0329 12/03/2002 CRAIG L TIMBRELL & GEORGIA M TIMBRELL 18 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 14 SOBERTON STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 937 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 282

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0330 12/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 19 $143,036.00 Approved

Prop address 12 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 805 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0333 12/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 19 $107,369.00 Approved

Prop address 12 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 881 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0340 14/03/2002 LORRAINE A FLORESTA & SALVATORE FLORESTA 26 $159,853.00 Approved

Prop address 28 WADHURST ROAD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 871 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 852

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0342 14/03/2002 COLIN J CUNNINGHAM & DIANA R CUNNINGHAM 25 $127,723.00 Approved

Prop address 12 OARE LANE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 617 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 940

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0344 14/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 28 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 20 COVINGTON PROMENADE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 620 DP 29301

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0349 14/03/2002 JANICE SPENCE & ROY SPENCE 13 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 20 DODDINGTON WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 430 DP 27516 Vol 2215 Fol 138

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES

File Number

DA02/0355 15/03/2002 COLIN L COOMBS & HENDRICKA L COOMBS 18 $82,000.00 Approved

Prop address 4 HAREWOOD PLACE MARANGAROO WA 6064

Land Lot 482 P 17035 Vol 1858 Fol 590

Description Ancilliary Accommodation

Applicants Fleetwood Homes

File Number 73381

DA02/0368 15/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 16 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 86 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 699 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 413

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0371 18/03/2002 EILEEN S HENSHAW & THOMAS P HENSHAW 19 $123,724.00 Approved

Prop address 27 ITCHEN LOOP BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 541 DP 27675 Vol 2506 Fol 684

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0374 19/03/2002 SCOTT J KOUNIS 10 $500,000.00 Approved

Prop address 1 ROSSLARE PROMENADE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 36 D 74819 Vol 1831 Fol 742

Description TWO STOREY DWELLING WITH BASEMENT

Applicants SCOTT J KOUNIS

File Number

DA02/0375 19/03/2002 BRAJKOVICH HOLDINGS PTY LTD 13 $500.00 Refused

Prop address DIZZYLAMB PARK 414 KAROBORUP ROAD CARABOODA WA 6033

Land SWAN LOC 5838

Description BANNER SIGN - DIZZYLAMB PARK

Applicants BRAJKOVICH HOLDINGS PTY LTD

File Number 45082

DA02/0382 21/03/2002 K.C. SI PTY LTD 10 $2,000.00 Approved

Prop address MARANGAROO MEDICAL CENTRE 1 WINGHAM STREET MARANGAROO WA 6064

Land Lot 1041 P 12260 Vol 1500 Fol 429

Description Dental Laboratory & Consulting Rooms

Applicants MALCOLM MCGIBBON

File Number

DA02/0386 21/03/2002 No owners recorded 18 $4,000.00 Approved

Prop address LNR: APPLICN PROCESSING ONLY WA

Land MULTI LOT

Description Sales Office and Display Homesites

Applicants K JEAVONS

File Number

DA02/0388 21/03/2002 IAN R JANSEN & JULIE A JANSEN 12 $183,563.00 Approved

Prop address 20 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 800 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 258

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0401 25/03/2002 IVAN G MORICE & LIANNE TURNER-MORICE 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 14 ORWELL WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 886 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 867

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0402 25/03/2002 ST BRIGIDS CONVENT OF MERCY INC 21 $120,000.00 Approved

Prop address MERCY COLLEGE/PRIMARY SCHOOL 26 MIRRABOOKA AVENUE KOONDOOLA WA 6064

Land Lot 1 D 41047 Vol 1409 Fol 858

Description Educational Establishment (x 2 class rooms)

Applicants SLAVIN ARCHITECTS

File Number 01712

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0403 25/03/2002 CECIL G GLENISTER 12 $1,565.00 Approved

Prop address LAKELANDS CARAVAN PARK 289 SYDNEY ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 20 D 89534 Vol 1728 Fol 992

Description PATIO / BAY 93

Applicants ERECT-A-PAT

File Number

DA02/0409 25/03/2002 EMMA M REID & JOSHUA P REID 20 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 57 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 534 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 405

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0411 26/03/2002 MARGARET E BRIGHT 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 873 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 854

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0412 26/03/2002 CHRISTINE J DAWE & GARY R DAWE 11 $30,000.00 Approved

Prop address 69 WILDFLOWER DRIVE CARRAMAR WA 6031

Land Lot 182 D 73277 Vol 1800 Fol 501

Description Extension to Dwelling

Applicants CHRISTINE J DAWE, GARY R DAWE

File Number

DA02/0416 26/03/2002 CHRISTINE PROCTER 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 5 EVERSDEN CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 374 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 924

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0419 26/03/2002 VAN T LE & THI N HUYNH 10 $20,000.00 Approved

Prop address 108 SAFARI PLACE CARABOODA WA 6033

Land Lot 7 D 41471 Vol 1370 Fol 158

Description Additions to Shed & Cannery

Applicants VAN T LE, THI N HUYNH

File Number

DA02/0421 26/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 876 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0425 27/03/2002 CHRISTOPHER R LARSON & JOAN LARSON 10 $7,000.00 Approved

Prop address 22 MEGA STREET WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 110 P 11073 Vol 1396 Fol 009

Description Shed exceeding 60sqm

Applicants PETER R LANDER

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0428 27/03/2002 SEABEAM ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 7 $112,880.00 Approved

Prop address 34 LILAC HILL VISTA MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 177 DP 28992

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0429 27/03/2002 IVAN ZELINA & RENATA ZELINOVA 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 19 MANTA PASS MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1119 P 24247 Vol 2197 Fol 798

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants NOVUS HOMES

File Number

DA02/0430 26/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 71 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 747 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0431 27/03/2002 ALFRED R ROWORTH & CLIFFORD R ROWORTH 15 $33,814.00 Approved

Prop address 30 QUEENSWAY ROAD LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 57 P 8649 Vol 1488 Fol 719

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants CLIFFORD R ROWORTH, ALFRED R ROWORTH

File Number

DA02/0432 27/03/2002 CLIVE G WILLIAMS & TANYA M WILLIAMS 9 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 66 LANDSDALE ROAD DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 910 DP 29304 Vol 2512 Fol 310

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DANMAR HOMES

File Number

DA02/0433 28/03/2002 JENNIFER GLIGUROVSKI & PAOLO GULLOTTO 10 $150,000.00 Approved

Prop address 18 GUNGURRU AVENUE HOCKING WA 6065

Land Lot 216 P 23992 Vol 2198 Fol 593

Description Single Storey Dwelling

Applicants JENNIFER GLIGUROVSKI, PAOLO GULLOTTO

File Number

DA02/0435 28/03/2002 TOM HARRISON & KEVIN R HARRISON 17 $7,480.00 Approved

Prop address 1976 WANNEROO ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031

Land Lot 50 D 83542 Vol 1952 Fol 612

Description Addition to Dwelling - Rural Property

Applicants TOM HARRISON, KEVIN R HARRISON

File Number

DA02/0436 28/03/2002 KERRY R MCDONALD & MICHELLE L MCDONALD 8 $53,857.00 Approved

Prop address 48 BIBBULMUN ENTRANCE SINAGRA WA 6065

Land Lot 97 D 98154 Vol 2175 Fol 798

Description Addition / Granny Flat

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOME IMPROVEMENT

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0439 28/03/2002 SHARON BUCKLEY 10 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 34 FRANGIPANI LOOP MARANGAROO WA 6064

Land Lot 770 P 19047 Vol 1963 Fol 476

Description Home Business Application

Applicants SHARON BUCKLEY

File Number

DA02/0440 28/03/2002 EDWARD R PEARSALL 13 $15,000.00 Approved

Prop address 8 CALABRESE AVENUE WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Part Lot 12 D 13694 Vol 108 Fol 120A

Description Retaining Walls

Applicants DENNIS BROOKS

File Number 73439

DA02/0441 28/03/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 4 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 97 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 714 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 417

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0442 02/04/2002 IAN S MALEY & TONYA C MALEY 19 $10,000.00 Approved

Prop address 21 SEMINARA PLACE MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land Lot 6 D 86459 Vol 2095 Fol 447

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants IAN S MALEY, TONYA C MALEY

File Number 06411

DA02/0445 02/04/2002 KARIN HIGGS & GRANT P MANLEIN 6 $117,700.00 Approved

Prop address 2 BRONZEWING GROVE MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land Lot 5 P 23141 Vol 2160 Fol 883

Description SINGLE DWELLING

Applicants ACCENT ON HOMES

File Number 62165

DA02/0446 02/04/2002 ROBERT P HENLEY 11 $15,000.00 Approved

Prop address 167 CARABOODA ROAD CARABOODA WA 6033

Land Lot 9 P 8913 Vol 549 Fol 125A

Description GARAGE / STORAGE SHED

Applicants HIGHLINE BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number

DA02/0448 03/04/2002 ANDREW M BRADLEY & ELAINE M BRADLEY 17 $137,833.00 Approved

Prop address 8 HOLLINS BEND MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 183 DP 28269 Vol 2513 Fol 043

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0449 03/04/2002 JEAN-CLAUDE C CERA & SHARON K CERA 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 WARNFORD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 922 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 878

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0450 03/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 ORWELL WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 909 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 875

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0451 03/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 13 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 17 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 872 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0454 03/04/2002 ROBERT VAN OOSTEN & SALLY A VAN OOSTEN 18 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 LUMLEY CLOSE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1503 DP 27680 Vol 2218 Fol 4

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0455 04/04/2002 ROSLYN P TAYLOR 9 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 WADHURST ROAD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 858 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 844

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0456 04/04/2002 AHL HOLDINGS LIMITED 13 $17,600.00 Approved

Prop address 93A EAST ROAD HOCKING WA 6065

Land Lot 9001 DP 28089

Description ESTATE WALLS

Applicants Urban Landscaping

File Number

DA02/0457 02/04/2002 GARY RAMSDEN & LUCIA L RAMSDEN 14 $2,500.00 Approved

Prop address 21A HOLYHEAD GREEN MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1 Vol 2152 Fol 894 S/P 35123

Description BALCONY TO DUPLEX

Applicants GARY RAMSDEN, LUCIA L RAMSDEN

File Number

DA02/0460 05/04/2002 HOANG T TRUONG 8 $10,500.00 Approved

Prop address 304 BADGERUP ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 29 D 36475 Vol 301 Fol 003A

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants HOANG T TRUONG

File Number 152454

DA02/0461 05/04/2002 CATHERINE J BROUGHTON 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 HARDWOOD TURN MERRIWA WA 6030

Land Lot 1928 DP 29490

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants JAXON CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0462 05/04/2002 PAUL J KENDALL & SUE A KENDALL 11 $20,000.00 Approved

Prop address 75 ADAMS ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land Lot 29 P 23143 Vol 2157 Fol 810

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants PAUL J KENDALL

File Number 192644

DA02/0463 05/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 8 $100.00 Approved

Prop address 18 WADHURST ROAD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 866 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0464 04/04/2002 PEET & CO LTD ATF YATALA UNIT TRUST 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 24 KIRKIMBIE STREET CARRAMAR WA 6031

Land Lot 1426 DP 28778

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0466 05/04/2002 DAMIEN B FORSSMAN & SHARON C FORSSMAN 5 $91,358.00 Approved

Prop address 8 WORDSWORTH DRIVE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 109 DP 29961 Vol 2515 Fol 371

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0468 05/04/2002 KEVIN N KNIGHT & LINDA J KNIGHT 4 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 LAUTOKA RISE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1407 DP 28984 Vol 2218 Fol 211

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0469 05/04/2002 LEIGH H BRIDGER & MARK S BRIDGER 0 $131,800.00 Approved

Prop address 5 ST ANTHONY AVENUE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 367 P 24047 Vol 2194 Fol 530

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0471 08/04/2002 SEABEAM ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 10 LILAC HILL VISTA MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 189 DP 28764

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ARTHUR RONDAS

File Number

DA02/0472 08/04/2002 ALAN J TUCKER & ANN TUCKER 7 $5,000.00 Approved

Prop address 1 BALLADONG LOOP CARRAMAR WA 6031

Land Lot 485 P 20419 Vol 2032 Fol 049

Description STORM PORCH

Applicants ALAN J TUCKER, ANN TUCKER

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0473 08/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 12 STAPLEHURST CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 604 DP 29301

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0474 08/04/2002 JOSEPH P HEALY, MARY J HEALY, MICHAEL J 15 $40,000.00 Approved

Prop address SERVICE STATION 2624 WANNEROO ROAD NOWERGUP WA 6032

Land Lot 1 D 45509 Vol 1501 Fol 999

Description REDEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING SHOP

Applicants PATRICK A HEALY

File Number 152248

DA02/0478 09/04/2002 DENISE CATHRO & ZANE S CATHRO 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 20 MOWBRAY SQUARE CLARKSON WA 6030

Land Lot 123 DP 28090 Vol 2509 Fol 859

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants IMPRESSIONS

File Number

DA02/0482 09/04/2002 TERENCE J BALL & ROSELINE KRISHNAN 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 6 CROFTON COVE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 370 DP 25561 Vol 2211 Fol 59

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0483 09/04/2002 MINDARIE KEYS JOINT VENTURE 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 3 BOUNTY WAY MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 472 P 24282 Vol 2198 Fol 681

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0487 09/04/2002 GRAZYNA WONDOLOWSKI & ZBIGNIEW 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 14 ROSEBUD COURT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1009 P 22517 Vol 2129 Fol 311

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants Opes Homes

File Number

DA02/0489 10/04/2002 AUSTRALAND HOLDINGS LTD 10 $133,075.00 Approved

Prop address 27 KINGSWAY MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 109 DP 28269 Vol 2519 Fol 009

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0491 11/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 5 $95,840.00 Approved

Prop address 23 CAMBORNE PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 793 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0492 11/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 5 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 802 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0493 11/04/2002 EDWARD R D'ARACHY & FIONA J D'ARACHY 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 4 ARDMORE TERRACE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 105 DP 27702 Vol 2509 Fol 540

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0497 12/04/2002 RAYMOND A PAYNE & Ms SUSAN PAYNE 11 $10,000.00 Approved

Prop address 172 PINJAR ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land MARIGINIUP LOT 13

Description Rural Development - Addition to existing house

Applicants RAYMOND A PAYNE, Ms SUSAN PAYNE

File Number 15370

DA02/0499 12/04/2002 KEITH E WAKELING & MARIA J WAKELING 11 $25,000.00 Approved

Prop address 81 CONDUCTOR RETREAT MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land Lot 126 D 95050 Vol 2140 Fol 643

Description Horse Paddocks

Applicants KEITH E WAKELING, MARIA J WAKELING

File Number

DA02/0500 15/04/2002 NORTH WHITFORDS ESTATES PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 RAEBURN CRESCENT LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1279 DP 29495

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

DA02/0505 15/04/2002 SEABEAM ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 12 SABINA PARK DRIVE MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 154 DP 28993

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0507 15/04/2002 STEPHEN R CARTER 5 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 46 QUINNS ROAD MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 341 DP 25561 Vol 2211 Fol 050

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0508 15/04/2002 TAYLOR WOODROW AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 DRIVER ROAD DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 227 DP 29513

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0511 15/04/2002 NATHAN P STUBBERFIELD 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 879 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 860

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ACCENT ON HOMES

File Number

DA02/0512 15/04/2002 CHRISTOPHER W COVES 9 $9,650.00 Approved

Prop address 4 HERITAGE TERRACE GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 268 P 18490 Vol 1941 Fol 184

Description FLAT & GABLED ROOF PATIOS WITH COLORBOND ROOF COVER

Applicants CHRISTOPHER W COVES

File Number 171276

DA02/0513 16/04/2002 JUSTIN SONIA PTY LTD 2 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 77 KINGSWAY MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 166 DP 24490

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0514 16/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 5 $84,183.00 Approved

Prop address 95 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 715 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0517 17/04/2002 CHRISTOPHER L CAMPBELL & CHARLOTE A 7 $5,000.00 Approved

Prop address 60 REES DRIVE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 21 P 10527 Vol 1361 Fol 515

Description Additions to Dwelling and Garage

Applicants CHRISTOPHER L CAMPBELL, CHARLOTE A TOMLINSON

File Number

DA02/0521 18/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 11 SOBERTON STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 927 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0522 18/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 3 $98,453.00 Approved

Prop address 14 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 804 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0525 18/04/2002 LORRAINE C REA & MICHAEL REA 3 $91,159.00 Approved

Prop address 18 LANGFORD BOULEVARD MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 228 DP 28269

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0526 18/04/2002 TAYLOR WOODROW AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 4 $92,756.00 Approved

Prop address 5 DRIVER ROAD DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 122 DP 29513

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0529 19/04/2002 MARK N LIEBECK & YVONNE A LIEBECK 3 $45,000.00 Approved

Prop address 35 LAKELANDS DRIVE GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 9 D 77922 Vol 1883 Fol 713

Description Additions to Dwelling

Applicants MARK N LIEBECK, YVONNE A LIEBECK

File Number

DA02/0532 22/04/2002 ANDREW J MARTIN & MICHELLE G MARTIN 5 $11,500.00 Approved

Prop address 2280 WANNEROO ROAD NOWERGUP WA 6032

Land Lot 54 D 80477 Vol 1827 Fol 923

Description Additions on Rural Property

Applicants ANDREW J MARTIN, MICHELLE G MARTIN

File Number 02051

DA02/0534 22/04/2002 KIM-NGA T PHAM & THO V TRUONG 2 $111,337.00 Approved

Prop address 19 DRIVER ROAD DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 225 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 936

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0535 22/04/2002 PAULINE J CATTACH 5 $5,832.00 Approved

Prop address 376 SYDNEY ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 102 D 95000

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants PAULINE J CATTACH

File Number 08519

DA02/0536 22/04/2002 TINKU WALIA 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 LAUTOKA RISE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1413 DP 28984 Vol 2218 Fol 217

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0537 22/04/2002 ANTONINO D PRUITI-CIARELLO & KIRSTY J 5 $4,000.00 Approved

Prop address 588 NEAVES ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065

Land Lot 8 P 16880 Vol 1839 Fol 468

Description Carport

Applicants ANTONINO D PRUITI-CIARELLO, KIRSTY J PRUITI-CIARELLO

File Number 35201

DA02/0538 22/04/2002 BRONWYN R SCHULTZ & JOHN M SCHULTZ 1 $117,210.00 Approved

Prop address 5 WARNFORD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 890 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 871

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

City of Wanneroo Development Applications determined for Period

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/04/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/04/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0545 23/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 4 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 27 CAMBORNE PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 795 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0547 23/04/2002 CAVERSHAM PROPERTY PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 9 HARDWOOD TURN MERRIWA WA 6030

Land Lot 1919 DP 29490 Vol 2515 Fol 18

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0554 24/04/2002 ASHLEY R EVERSDEN & ROWENA J EVERSDEN 2 $108,571.00 Approved

Prop address 4 DODDINGTON WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 422 DP 27516 Vol 2215 Fol 130

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0557 24/04/2002 CAVERSHAM PROPERTY PTY LTD 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 HARDWOOD TURN MERRIWA WA 6030

Land Lot 1921 DP 29490

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0566 29/04/2002 PATRICK J MATHERS & VIVIEN M MATHERS 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 6 PEASLAKE STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 878 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 859

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants CONTENT LIVING

File Number

DA02/0568 29/04/2002 DAVID S HEATON & PAUL L HEATON 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 17 JAMES COOK AVENUE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 782 DP 27364 Vol 2214 Fol 797

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0585 30/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 11 ORWELL WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 907 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

7. Subdivision Applications Determined By Delegated Authority In April 2002

File Ref: 64346

File Name: FCSUBAPP.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 02 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning And Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 13

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Determination of subdivision applications processed in the period between 1 April and 30 April 2002 under delegated authority.

Detail

The West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.

Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Division this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.

Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.

SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).

SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.

SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.

SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.

SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.

SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.

The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority between 1 April and 30 April 2002.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTE the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority between 1 April and 30 April 2002 as listed:

WAPC No/Recd.

Location /Owner

Zoning / LDU Category

Advice

WAPC Advised

117770

13/11/01

Pt Lot 15 (1930) Marmion Avenue, Clarkson

LandCorp

Centre/Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

18/4/02

Note: Originally Deferred by WAPC

117865

19/11/01

Lot 35 (323) Kingsway, Landsdale 6065

Taylor Woodrow Australia Pty Ltd

Residential Zoning

SCU6

Not Supported

‘Poultry farm buffer’

8/4/02

Note: Originally Deferred by WAPC

118466

05/03/02

Pt Lot 3 (40) Backshall Place, Wanneroo

KE & P J Okely

Reservation – Parks & Recreation/Urban Development

SCU6

Not Supported

‘Contrary to Agreed LSP’

08/4/02

118595

08/03/02

Lot 9000 (131) Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove

Homeswest Vacant

Special Residential02/Urban Development/

Regional Reservation - Other Regional Road

SCU1

Supported

8/4/02

118665

25/03/02

Lot 12 (48) Stoney Road, Gnangara

C & M Bolsenbroek

Rural Resource

SCU5

Supported

4/4/02

118693

28/3/02

Lot 9003 (133C) Clarkson Ave, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

29/4/02

118763

5/4/02

Lot 48 (105) Landsdale Road, Darch

Landsdale Park Pty Ltd

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

22/4/02

8	118765 5/4/02	Lot 9003 (133C) Clarkson Ave, Tapping Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	30/4/02
9	118772 5/4/02	Lot 9001 (83) Donnelly Ramble, Wanneroo Balwyn Wanneroo Pty Ltd	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	22/4/02
10	22-02 14/3/02	Lot 245 (104) Manchester Drive, Hocking G R Beckhurst	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	4/4/02
11	299-02 27/03/02	Lot 49 (6) Sinagra Street, Wanneroo H Hill	Residential SCU5	Supported	15/4/02
12	1188601 12/03/02	Lot 35 (69) Landsdale Road, Darch A & B Klarich	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	4/4/02
13	118602 12/3/02	Lot 35 (69) Landsdale Road, Darch A & B Klarich	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	4/4/02

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

ATTACHMENT 1

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 4

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 5

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 6

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 7

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 8

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 9

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 10

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 11

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 12

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 13

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Other Matters

8. Consideration Of A Draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan

File Ref: 18951

File Name: HARelofL.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Paul Watt Date 30 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the adoption and release for public comment of a draft Management Plan prepared for the Gnangara Lake Reserve (GLR).

Background

The GLR has been suffering a loss of environmental and social value for a considerable period of time, owing to several different factors, including the following:

· Uncontrolled off-road vehicle access;

· Weed invasion;

· Phytophthora dieback;

· Poor Fire management;

· Inappropriate facilities;

· Poor access;

· Water quality;

· Bushland fragmentation and inappropriate tracks; and

· Fragmentation of ownership and management responsibilities.

In recognition of this, at its meeting of 6 February 2001 (Item W20-02/01) Council resolved that it:

“1. Defers the upgrade of reticulation works at Lake Gnangara Park, as approved in the current budget, until a new Management Plan for the park is prepared to reflect the current policies and practices.

2. Approves the preparation of a brief for the appointment of a consultant to prepare a new Management Plan for Lake Gnangara Park.

3. Lists for consideration in the draft 2001/2002 Capital Works Budget an amount of $100,000 for fencing, signage and associated restoration works for Lake Gnangara Park.”

Detail

The various land parcels comprising GLR are vested with the City of Wanneroo, Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) and Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). This fragmentation of ownership and therefore management responsibility means that the site has not previously been considered in a holistic manner.

The existing Management Plan dates from 1990 and is considered to be significantly outdated owing to improvements in environmental awareness, knowledge, policy, legislation etc. The plan also only considers land vested with the City.

To ensure the best possible outcomes the brief for quotes to prepare the Management Plan was prepared in consultation with the CALM and DPI. After consideration of submissions, environmental consultants ATA Environmental were subsequently engaged by the City to prepare the Management Plan. The DPI and CALM have both expressed support for the development of the Management Plan, with the CALM contributing to the process by engaging a consultant to map the extent of Phytopthora dieback in the reserve. Representatives from both agencies have also been involved with the preparation process with their comments requested at several stages. A copy of the draft Management Plan has been placed in the Elected Members reading room.

Consultation

The draft Management Plan was prepared with the involvement of the CALM and DPI and the City’s Conservation Advisory Committee. A workshop was held with the City’s Conservation Advisory Committee and other invited stakeholders to examine options for the reserve on 10^th October 2001. It is now intended to release the draft for public comment for a period of 6 weeks. Copies of the plan will be distributed to the DPI, CALM, Water and Rivers Commission and adjoining landowners for formal comment as part of the consultative process.

Comment

The draft GLR Management Plan seeks to improve the environmental and social qualities of the Gnangara Lake area by considering the bushland and wetland as a single portion of land. Each of the relevant agencies will be responsible for adopting and implementing the Management Plan as it relates to land under its management. The draft GLR Management Plan is intended to be reviewed within 5 years and makes a number of recommendations under the following headings:

· Principal management directions;

· Conservation;

· Recreation;

· Leases and commercial operations;

· Community relations;

· Research and monitoring; and

· Implementation.

The detailed list of recommendations under each of these headings is set out in Attachment 1 of this report. Each recommendation has been allocated a timeframe for implementation and a responsible agency to ensure that it is carried out. The primary focus of the draft Management Plan has been to control off-road vehicle access, enable pedestrian access, improve facilities including carparking, prevent further bushland degradation and enable rehabilitation. The Plan proposes that the reserve be divided into 3 zones each with a different management focus.

The zones are:

· Conservation and Protection Zone;

· Recreation Zone; and

· Rehabilitation Demonstration Zone.

The plan indicating these zones and other recommendations is set out in Attachment 2 of this report. The extent of each zone is based upon the quality of the vegetation and existing land uses. The Conservation and Protection Zone comprises most of the site, with the Rehabilitation Demonstration Zone occupying land that was formerly used as a quarry. The proposed Recreation Zone areas refers to the existing semi-developed areas. The Management Plan recommends that conservation should be established as the principal management direction, with any other uses to be compatible with this.

Strategic Implications

The draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan is consistent with the City’s draft Strategic Plan (SP) and its goal of Environmental Sustainability. A suggested action of the SP is to “review and develop management plans for priority sites”.

Policy Implications

The review of the Management Plan is consistent with the City’s policy on Environmental Sustainability which has the following objectives:

“To:

· Protect and enhance the natural and human environment for the benefit of present and future generations;

· Minimise, as far as practicable, any adverse environmental impacts associated with its activities

· Take advantage of environmentally beneficial opportunities.”

Financial Implications

The Management Plan has financial implications for all 3 landholders – the City of Wanneroo, CALM and DPI, with each landholder being responsible for its portion of land. The draft Plan makes recommendations for works in several areas that will ultimately cost a considerable amount. (Attachment 3 refers).

The cost estimates are for the total land area and have not been broken down into areas that are the responsibility of the 3 landholders. The plan notes that any rehabilitation undertaken will need to be a long term proposition, owing to the high cost involved and identifies 3 sites as priorities, with most of the area being on land managed by the DPI or CALM. The adoption of a Management Plan may assist the City in obtaining funds from other sources to assist with the proposed works schedule.

Council has $100,000 allocated in the current financial year budget for fencing and associated works for this reserve.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ADOPTS the Management Strategies contained within the Draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan, as outlined in Attachments 1 and 2 to this report, and advertises the Management Strategies for a period of 6 weeks.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

10. SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

All of the management strategies included in this Management Plan are listed in Table 7. Each of the management strategies has been assigned a rating for implementation that identifies those strategies that should be focussed on initially and those that can be implemented at a later time.

The rating system applicable as part of this Management Plan is as follows:

High [H] primary importance, implement immediately (within 2 years)

Medium [M] secondary importance, implement within 2 –5 years

Low [L] longer term consideration, implement within 5-10 years

The agency that should have primary responsibility for implementing or overseeing implementation of the management strategy is nominated in Table 7. In several instances all of the landowners or vesting authorities of land within GLR are considered responsible for implementation of the strategies, while for others the primary role for implementation is assigned to a single agency.

The nominated responsible agency may change subject to the negotiations and outcome of strategies to establish a Regional Park (P4) and establishment of the coordinating group (P5) and interim formal management arrangements (P6).

TABLE 7

MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Management Strategy		Rating	Responsible Agency
PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS
	Establish conservation as the primary goal of GLR and allow and promote managed recreation, educational and research activities consistent with the conservation objectives.	H	ALL
	Adopt the management principles for GLR outlined in this Management Plan.	H	ALL
	Implement management of GLR according to the zones and their acceptable uses and facilities identified in this Management Plan.	H	ALL
	Amend the vesting purpose and create reserves as necessary to ensure the entire GLR is managed as a Conservation and Recreation “A” Class reserve as part of a broader Regional Park with CALM as the managing authority.	M-L	ALL
	Establish a coordinating group to oversee implementation of this Management Plan.	H	ALL
	Establish interim formal management arrangements to coordinate management between the vested agencies and landowners until a Regional Park is formed.	H	ALL
	Ensure adequate liaison with relevant agencies to promote integrated management of GLR with adjoining areas such as Gnangara Park and any future Regional Park incorporating nearby wetlands.	M	ALL

Management Strategy		Rating	Responsible Agency
CONSERVATION
	Investigate the causes of acidification within the lake and develop a remediation program.	M-L	CoW
	Regularly review results of water level, water quality and biological monitoring within the lake, and identify significant changes or issues and implement strategies as necessary.	H	CoW
	Progressively rehabilitate disturbed and degraded areas initially focussing efforts in areas that have greatest potential to impact on better quality vegetation areas.	H-M	ALL
	Implement a weed control program that prioritises control of weeds based on invasiveness, distribution and impacts, focuses on areas adjacent to those that are largely weed free, and is integrated with rehabilitation works.	H	ALL
	Ensure recreation areas are appropriately designed to minimise potential for grass and other species to invade bushland areas.	H	CoW
	Follow suitable hygiene practices during implementation of works.	H	ALL
	Consider strategic phosphorus acid or phosphite application to control spread into currently uninfested areas.	M-L	ALL
	Use species that are resistant to dieback to revegetate areas that have been mapped as infested or uninterpretable.	H	ALL
	Consider implementing a baiting program for feral animals in association with feral animal control methods that may be implemented within adjoining pine plantations.	M-L	ALL
	Consider imposing controls on domestic cats within surrounding development areas.	M-L	CoW
	Install and maintain firebreaks as outlined in this Management Plan.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Develop and implement a Fire Management and Response Plan for GLR.	H	ALL
	Remove all waste such as car bodies, sheet metal and household refuse from GLR on a continuous basis.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Ensure the implementation of management measures is in accordance with the requirements of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972.	H	ALL
	Incorporate information on the cultural values into interpretative material and facilities where feasible.	M	ALL
	Liaise with Aboriginal groups to discuss proposed works and determine possible involvement in the management of GLR.	H	ALL
	Protect important viewscapes from nominated recreational areas.	H	CoW
RECREATION
	Develop recreational areas with appropriate facilities within the areas of GLR nominated as suitable for recreational use in accordance with this Management Plan.	H	CoW
	Remove existing facilities on the south-east of the lake and develop new facilities including toilets, picnic areas, parkland, play equipment and car parking.	H	CoW
	Consider development of a Rehabilitation Demonstration area within the disused quarry near Gnangara Road to include recreational opportunities associated with environmental education as part of the rehabilitation strategy.	M	ALL
	Install fencing or bollards around recreation nodes and GLR perimeter to limit off road vehicle access.	H	CoW
	Prohibit access for activities such as wildflower harvesting and off-road vehicle training.	H-M	CALM
	Install dual use paths and walk trails around the periphery of the wetland and within the bushland areas.	H-M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Ensure access for fire fighting and maintenance vehicles.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Permit dogs within Recreation Zones only on a leash.	H	CoW
	Install bridle trails adjacent to the dual use path around the lake and along firebreaks in the northern section of GLR.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Annually review the impacts of horse riding and dog exercise activities as part of routine monitoring.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Rationalise tracks by closing and rehabilitating tracks with no identified use.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Erect signage at strategic locations that informs visitors of access and facilities, and provides interpretive material about the values of GLR and possible impacts of inappropriate use of the area.	H-M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Promote visitor safety through educative material and signage.	H-M	ALL
LEASES & COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
	Mining and quarrying activities within GLR should not be permitted.	H	ALL
	Any permitted commercial activities are to be consistent with or complementary to the conservation objectives	H	ALL
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
	Investigate the potential use of the existing house within GLR for interpretive and educative purposes and/or as a base for community groups assisting within environmental management in the area.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Signage, leaflets, articles and interpretive walk trails should be used to encourage greater appreciation of the values of GLR and its management.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Support and encourage involvement of the community and community based organizations in seed collection, tree planting, weed removal and monitoring by informing the community of planned activities and canvassing support.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Develop programs in association with local schools for involvement with activities such as seed collecting, planting and monitoring, and for visits to GLR to increase awareness and appreciation of the area.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Seek the input of local residents as part of the process of implementation and review of this Management Plan.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Use signage or organised events to identify community groups, schools, and other parties that are involved in or sponsor activities associated with management of GLR.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
RESEARCH & MONITORING
	Promote research activities within GLR particularly to investigate water quality issues within Gnangara Lake through liaison with relevant agencies and educational institutions.	M	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Support the continuation of current monitoring programs undertaken by the WRC.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Routinely monitor changes in bushland condition and weed distribution, fire events, visitor usage and impacts of activities.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
IMPLEMENTATION
	Develop a detailed 5 year program for the implementation of the measures outlined in this Management Plan.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Liaise with the various responsible agencies or owners of land in GLR to ensure a coordinated management approach for implementation, funding and staffing is developed.	H	ALL
	Coordinate activities of community groups and volunteers within GLR.	H-M	CoW
	Review management strategies and implementation progress on an annual basis in conjunction with preparation of a detailed works program. The review should identify what has been achieved and consider the implications of any new information.	H	CoW with CALM & DPI
	Revise the plan within 5 years from the date the final plan is produced	H	CoW with CALM & DPI

Note: CoW: City of Wanneroo

CALM: Department of Conservation & Land Management

DPI: Department of Planning & Infrastructure

ALL: CoW, CALM, DPI

WRC: Water & Rivers Commission

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

TABLE 6

INDICATIVE COSTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK

Management Proposal	Estimated Requirements	Cost per unit *	Estimated Total Cost
Car Parking	750m² (25 bays)	Concrete / Asphalt: $25/m²	$18,750
Car Parking	750m² (25 bays)	Limestone: $7/m²	$5,250
Road Access	~200m	Concrete / Asphalt: $150/m	$30,000
Road Access	~200m	Limestone: $50/m	$10,000
DUP	5800m	Limestone: $10/m	$58,000
Walk Paths	2400m	Limestone: $10/m	$24,000
Fencing	9400m	Ringlock (1.2m): $10/m	$94,000
Bollards	650m	1.5m, 600mm in: $15/m	$9,750
Vehicle Access Point	13 access points	Collapsible Bollard: $900ea	$11,700
		Removable Bollard: $150ea	$1,950
		Steel Mesh Gate: $500ea	$6,500
Bridle Trails/Fire Breaks (ripping of soil, minor clearing)	5900m	$0.15/m	$885
BBQ (standard two plate electric in brick surround)	2 units	$7,000 per unit	$14,000
Tables/Seating (on concrete slab)	6 units	$1,000 per unit	$6,000
Play Equipment (pit and equipment)	1 unit	$25,000-$35,000 per unit	$25,000-$35,000
Signage (Sign and posts)	2 large (80x60cm)	$400ea	$800
Signage (Sign and posts)	10 small (40x30cm)	$150ea	$1,500
Rehabilitation (development of detailed Rehabilitation Plan and implementation of revegetation / weed control)	~400,000m²	$2.50/m²	$1,000,000

Note: * Estimates identified above do not include costs of on-going maintenance and monitoring

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

9. Unauthorised Land Use: Lot 7 (219) Mary Street, Wanneroo

File Ref: 09970

File Name: HAUnaLad.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by SB Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 06 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by hw Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Consideration of an extension of time to allow relocation of an unauthorised manufacturing business.

Background

In April, 2002, following a Councillor Request, the City investigated a rural property in Mary Street, Wanneroo, and observed metal roof trusses stored on the lot. An investigation later revealed the trusses were being manufactured in a large shed on the lot.

Detail

The subject land is zoned “ Rural Resources” under District Planning Scheme No 2 where manufacturing processes fall within the definition of “general industry” or ‘light industry”. Both definitions are “X” uses, which are not permitted uses, for that zoning.

As the City has no discretion to consider such a use, a notice to discontinue the business within 14 days was issued by the City. The lot owner contacted the City and requested a time extension and was subsequently offered three months to relocate.

In response, the landowner wrote to the Mayor alleging the complaint was laid by a vindictive neighbour. He claimed not to have been aware of the planning requirements and requested a twelve month moratorium on the closure of the business.

He was advised that a three month period was felt to be an appropriate, and reasonable time to find and relocate to an approved site. The City now understands the owner has requested a six month period for this.

Comment

Manufacturing is a use that is not permitted in a Rural Resource zone.

Once the City is made aware of any illegal activities it is obliged to take the necessary action to bring about compliance. The City has endeavoured to do this within a timeframe which is considered to be reasonable, however this does not suit the circumstances of the owner.

Council has two options available on this matter:

1. It can support the request for an extension of time to provide six months for the activity to cease.

2. If, however, it is felt that the six month moratorium is too excessive and creates administration difficulties in monitoring the non-permitted use, Council can reject the application and support a three month deadline for the closure of the unauthorised activities on the lot.

Statutory Compliance

The current manufacturing activity being conducted on the subject lot is illegal under DPS No 2 and therefore must be discontinued.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. DOES NOT SUPPORT the six month moratorium requested by Mr & Mrs N Tana;

2. ADVISES Mr & Mrs Tana that the current activity being conducted at Lot 7 Mary Street Wanneroo is not permitted and therefore must cease operating within 3 months and relocate from the lot.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Technical Services

Traffic Management

10. Calvert Way, Girrawheen - Parking Prohibitions

File Ref: 04120

File Name: BACalWay.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Karen Delves Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Karen Delves Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

The purpose of this report is to consider the installation of parking prohibition signs and associated kerb and footpath works in Calvert Way, Girrawheen.

Background

Parents accessing Girrawheen High School use Calvert Way to pick up and set down their children. The former City of Wanneroo/Joondalup constructed carparking embayments in 1998. Complaints have been received from the school regarding sight distance being obscured by parents parking on the northern verge, to the west of the school’s crossover.

Detail

Issues identified as a result of a site visit were:

· Most of the school catchment area is located towards Koondoola/Girrawheen and not Marangaroo. Both pedestrian and motorist activity is generated from these directions via Calvert Way.

· The carparking embayments on Calvert Way east are not being utilised by parents and similarly the eastern carpark within the school is not being fully utilised by teachers and
Year 12’s.

· Vehicles parked on the northern verge, west of the crossover for the entry to the school are obstructing sight distance for motorist and pedestrians.

· Vehicles parked on the southern verge (in front of the residences) blocked driveways and contributed to the deterioration of any grassed area on the verge. Vehicles also parked contra flow in the carparking embayments.

· Vehicles parked on the footpaths.

Outcomes to resolve many of the issues were identified as follows:

· Install “No Stopping Road or Verge” signs on the southern verge of Calvert Way (to preserve the residents amenity and access to their properties) and on the northern verge of Calvert Way to enhance sight distance for those egressing from the school’s carpark.

· Modification of the kerb profile to semi-mountable kerb in order to restrict vehicles mounting the verge.

· Reconstruction of the footpath to safely blend with the new semi-mountable kerb

· Modification to the school’s crossover.

Consultation

Consultation has taken place with the residents of Calvert Way who will be affected by parking prohibitions and the Principal of the school. All are in agreement with the parking prohibition signs being installed and the modifications to the kerb and footpath.

Comment

The installation of a new kerb profile on the southern side of Calvert Way will encroach into the old footpath and a section of the footpath will therefore require reconstruction. It is also an opportunity for residents to improve their crossovers and enhance their refurbished houses.

The installation of the parking prohibition sign on the road or verge will not be impeded by the proposed kerb modifications and can be installed immediately. This will enhance sight distance for both pedestrians and motorists egressing from the school site and will allow motorists travelling on the road network clearer vision of pedestrians and cyclists also using the road network. However, the kerb and footpath works are an integral part of the scheme to resolve the parking problems in Calvert Way and their implementation as part of the sign installation is supported.

Attachment 1 details the location/extent of the proposed parking prohibitions.

The estimated cost of the kerb and footpath remedial works is $15,000. The Education Department WA has not allocated any funds to the Wanneroo Junior Primary School Project (50% funding by each party), and the City funding of $30,000 in the 2001/2002 Capital Works Budget will not be expended. It is recommended that the works at Calvert Way be funded from this source with appropriate budget reallocation to be actioned. The remaining budget of $15,000 allocated to the Wanneroo Junior Primary School Project is available for reallocation.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

This proposal to install parking prohibition signs in Calvert Way, Girrawheen is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communitites” in the City’s draft Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

A budget reallocation from Project No. 2193 (Wanneroo Junior Primary School, Shaw Road) totalling $15,000 is requested to fund remedial works at Calvert Way in support of proposed parking prohibitions. A new project number will need to be allocated for this work to be titled as Calvert Way Parking Prohibition Remedial Works.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge” signs on the northern side of Calvert Way as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T 1791-1-0.

2. APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge” signs on the southern side of Calvert Way as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T 1791-1-0.

3. APPROVES the modifications to the kerbing and footpath in Calvert Way, Girrawheen as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T 1791-1-0 at an estimated cost of $15,000.

4. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(6) of the Local Government Act, APPROVES by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the expenditure to be incurred in respect to Recommendation 3.

5. NOTES that the cost of kerbing and footpath works associated with proposed parking prohibitions at Calvert Way, Girrawheen are to be funded from Project 2193 Wanneroo Junior Primary School, Shaw Road Capital Works Budget Allocation, giving rise to the following budget amendment:

Project No	From	To	Comment
2193	$15,000		Part of Wanneroo Junior Primary School, Shaw Road Capital Works Budget Allocation not expended due to Education Department WA not having allocated funds to cover their 50% share of the project cost.
To be allocated		$15,000	Cost of remedial works associated with proposed parking prohibitions at Calvert Way, Girrawheen.

6. NOTIFIES Girrawheen High School of Council’s decision.

7. NOTIFIES the residents of Calvert Way of Council’s decision.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

11. Brazier Road, Yanchep - Speed Zone Review

File Ref: 10063

File Name: BABraRoa.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To obtain concurrence with the speed limit changes on Brazier Road, Yanchep as requested by Main Roads Western Australia.

Background

Recently the City became aware that Brazier Road from Two Rocks Road to Wilkie Avenue (in front of the Yanchep Lagoon kiosk) became a dedicated road under the care and the responsibility of the City as at 14 September 2001. As a result Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) was requested to review the speed limit and road safety signs on this road. The current speed limit on Brazier Road is 60km/h.

Detail

MRWA has advised that it proposes to remove the current 60km/h speed limit on Brazier Road between Yanchep Beach Road and Wilkie Avenue and implement a 50km/h speed limit. This change will rationalise the speed limit to 50km/h for the whole of the Yanchep townsite. The revised speed limit will extend a distance of 150m north of the Yanchep Beach Road/Two Rocks Road intersection. It is then proposed to change to 70km/h for the next 500m and thereafter revert to the existing 90km/h speed limit – refer Attachment 1.

Comment

The Brazier Road alignment contains a set of reverse curves and in the last five years a number of recorded crashes of the “Out of Control” or “Runoff Road” type have occurred. It is the main access to the lagoon/kiosk area, which also attracts a large number of visitors. Brazier Road also provides alternative access to local residences.

MRWA has already indicated that the “proposed change has the endorsement of the Officer in Charge, Two Rocks Police Station”.

In considering the above information and in the interests of road safety for all road users, it is suggested that the proposed changes to the speed limit be supported.

Statutory Compliance

MRWA is responsible for speed zoning and associated signage while the WA Police Service is responsible for enforcing speed limits in accordance with the Road Traffic Code.

Strategic Implications

This proposal to reduce the speed limit in Brazier Road to 50kph is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s draft Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. CONCURS with the proposed reduction in the speed limit in Brazier Road between Yanchep Beach Road and Wilkie Avenue from 60kph to 50kph.

2. ADVISES Main Roads Western Australia of Council’s decision.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Infrastructure

12. 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program

File Ref: 08559

File Name: EA200200.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Jan Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachment: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Consideration of budget provision for the City’s component of the funding for the road projects approved in the 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program.

Background

Council at its meeting on 1 May 2001 (Item W149-05/01 refers) endorsed the submission of the following projects to Main Roads WA for funding as part of the Metropolitan Regional Road Program.

Road Improvement Projects 2002/2003 to 2005/2006

YEAR	ROAD	SECTION OF PROPOSED DUAL CARRIAGEWAY	ESTIMATED PROJECT COST	POINTS SCORE
2002/2003	Alexander Drive	Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Rd	$ 2,750,000	611
2002/2003	Mirrabooka Avenue	Marangaroo Dr to Hepburn Ave	$ 1,740,000	616
2004/2005	Hepburn Avenue	Giralt Road to Mirrabooka Ave	$ 3,500,000	443

Road Rehabilitation Projects – 2001/2002

ITEM	ROAD	SECTION	SUBURB	WORKS
1	Yanchep Beach Road	Ch 900 to Ch 2250 – Ch00 at Wanneroo Road	Yanchep	Asphalt Reseal
2	Kingsway	Wanneroo Road to Skiet Road	Madeley	Asphalt Reseal
3	Evandale Road	Kingsway to Friendly Way	Darch	Asphalt Reseal
4	Buckingham Drive	Wanneroo Road to Hartman Road	Wangara	Asphalt Reseal
5	Elliott Road	Greenfileds Circuit to Benmuni Road	Wanneroo/ Hocking	Asphalt Reseal
6	Giralt Road	Parin Road to Napier Road	Marangaroo	Asphalt Reseal
7	Templeton Crescent	Marangaroo Drive to Wanneroo Road	Girrawheen	Asphalt Reseal
8	Quarkum Street	Elliott Road to Karimba Street	Wanneroo	Asphalt Reseal

At its meeting on 4 September 2001, Council reviewed the submissions for Road Improvement Projects (Item TS06-09/01 refers) based on audited point scores and resolved:

To advise the North West Regional Road Sub Group of the following priorities for funding in the 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program – Improvements Projects:

Mirrabooka Avenue – Marangaroo Drive to Hepburn Avenue

Alexander Drive – Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road

Detail

The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure approved on 26 March 2002 the following projects as part of the 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program.

Road Improvement Projects

Hester Avenue – Marmion Avenue to Hidden Valley Retreat		$ 459,333
	Dual Carriageway Stage 2 Funding
Mirrabooka Avenue – Marangaroo drive to Hepburn Avenue		$ 540,667
	Dual Carriageway Stage 1 Funding
TOTAL		$1,000,000

Road Rehabilitation Projects

Kingsway, Madeley - Wanneroo Road to Skeet Road	$ 60,333
Buckingham Drive, Wangara – Wanneroo Road to Hartman Drive	$133,700
Elliot Road, Wanneroo – Greenfields Circuit to Benmuni Road	$102,924
Evandale Road, Darch – Kingsway to Friendly Way	$37,510

Comment

The reconstruction of Evandale Road to urban road standard with kerbing, drainage and asphalt seal has recently been completed as part of land development for the section between Kingsway and the Landsdale Farm School. When Hepburn Avenue, between Giralt Road and Mirrabooka Avenue is constructed there will be further upgrading works and modifications undertaken to Evandale Road between the Landsdale Farm School and Friendly Way. At the time of preparing the funding submission for an asphalt overlay to Evandale Road, a firm commitment for the upgrading of Evandale Road and construction of Hepburn Avenue had not been made. Given this commitment is now in place, it is recommended that Council advise Main Roads WA of these new developments and withdraw the Evandale Road Rehabilitation submission as it no longer complies with the guidelines.

With the remaining approved projects there is a requirement for Council to fund a minimum of one third the total cost of the works. On this basis, the recommended funding in the draft 2002/2003 Roadworks Capital Works Budget is summarised below:

Road Name	Total 2002/2003 Funding	MRRP Funding	Council Funding
Hester Avenue	$1,700,00	$459,333	$1,240,667
Mirrabooka Avenue	$1,000,000	$540,667	$459,333
Kingsway	$90,500	$61,333	$30,167
Buckingham Drive	$213,576	$133,700	$79,876
Elliot Road	$172,924	$102,924	$70,000
TOTAL	$3,177,000	$1,296,957	$1,880,043

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The funding of road improvement and rehabilitation projects through the Metropolitan Regional Road Program is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s draft Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to provide appropriate infrastructure to improve safety and security within the community.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

In accordance with the “Guidelines for Distribution of State Roads Funds to Local Government” as part of the Metropolitan Regional Road Program, Council is responsible for funding a minimum of one third of the cost of approved projects to ensure receipt of the State Government funding

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. NOTES that the following projects and associated funding have been approved as part of the 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program:

Hester Avenue	$459,333
Mirrabooka Avenue	$540,667
Kingsway	$61,333
Buckingham Drive	$133,700
Elliot Road	$102,924
Evandale road	$37,510

2. ADVISES Main Roads WA that it withdraws the Evandale Road Rehabilitation submission due to its upgrade as part of land development and proposed Hepburn Avenue roadworks.

3. LISTS with a high priority for consideration in the draft 2002/2003 Roadworks Capital Works Budget the following funding for road projects approved as part of the Metropolitan Regional Road Program.

Road Name	Total 2002/2003 Funding	MRRP Funding	Council Funding
Hester Avenue	$1,700,00	$459,333	$1,240,667
Mirrabooka Avenue	$1,000,000	$540,667	$459,333
Kingsway	$90,500	$61,333	$30,167
Buckingham Drive	$213,576	$133,700	$79,876
Elliot Road	$172,924	$102,924	$70,000
TOTAL	$3,177,000	$1,296,957	$1,880,043

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Funding and Budget

13. Franklin Road Shoulder Reconstruction Project

File Ref: 16135

File Name: FAFraRoa.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Jan Brindal Date 06 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Budget reallocation to utilise savings from Project Number 1159 – Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive to accommodate a shortfall in funding for the Franklin Road Shoulder Reconstruction Project as part of the Roads to Recovery Programme.

Background

The City received funding under the Federal Government Roads to Recovery Programme and allocated it to three projects as part of the 2001/2002 Capital Works Budget. Major works for one of these projects (Project No 1159 – Construction of Caffagio Crescent & Senario Drive) are complete and unexpended funds are available for reallocation to other road projects in accordance with the guidelines for the Roads to Recovery Program.

Detail

Funds received under the Roads to Recovery Programme were allocated to the following projects in the 2001/2002 Capital Works Budget:

Project Number	Description	Funds
1159	Caffagio Crescent & Senario Drive – Road Construction	$377,331
2130	Franklin Road – Shoulder Construction	$320,000
1213	Rangeview Road – Road Upgrade	$234,669

These funds were allocated based on preliminary cost estimates prepared during the budget formulation process for the 2001/2002 budget. However, during construction of Project Number 1159 - Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive, the scope of works was reviewed resulting in a reduction of the extent of earthworks, brick paving and landscaping on the northern side of Caffagio Crescent and on the eastern side of Senario Drive. Major works associated with this project have now been completed and unexpended funds in the order of $104,000 are available for use on other eligible projects. In order to fully utilise these funds provided under the Roads to Recovery Programme during the current financial year, it is necessary to reallocate surplus funds to other projects proposed for completion prior to 30 June 2002.

Council considered a report on this matter at its meeting on 9 April 2002 and approved the reallocation of $65,000 from Project No 1159, Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive – Road Construction to Project No 1213, Rangeview Road Reconstruction Project to meet the shortfall in funding for an increased scope of works for the project.

Franklin Road, Wanneroo is currently in the process of being upgraded between Trichet Road and Caporn Street. This project involves shoulder reconstruction to establish a 7.4 metre wide carriageway width, with 1.2 metre wide unsealed bitumen emulsion stabilised shoulders. It is funded from Project No 2130 which has a $320,000 approved budget allocation for this purpose. At the completion of this project the existing sealed surface will be asphalt resurfaced to a 7.4 metre width utilising the 2001/2002 Metropolitan Regional Road Program funding for this purpose.

A fundamental component of this upgrading project is to provide adequate drainage provisions on either side of the road. The normal rural standard drainage comprises open table drains with culverts across crossovers where required. Physical site constraints such as lamp posts, crossovers, boundary wall levels and underground utility services dictate that some kerbing and underground piped stormwater drainage will be necessary to adequately address the stormwater runoff from the pavement. The recent April rains highlighted the need to construct drainage facilities beyond that normally provided for rural roads. Although the drainage issue is complicated to a degree from runoff discharged from private properties, it is not considered that this situation is fundamental to the difficulties encountered.

This project was estimated on the basis that the upgrading work would be fully compliant with the City’s normal rural road standard, however these additional drainage requirements make it necessary for Council to consider a funding reallocation to meet the additional $39,000 cost associated with the kerbing and piped drainage.

Comment

The shoulder reconstruction works on Franklin Road between Rome road and Belgrade Road have been put on hold subject to additional funding being sourced for the proposed drainage upgrade works. These works are required to address existing drainage problems and the reallocation of funds is supported to undertake the drainage upgrade as part of the shoulder reconstruction works.

Project No’s 1159 (Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive) and 2130 (Franklin Road) are funded from the Roads to Recovery Programme and it is therefore appropriate to reallocate funds to the value of $39,000 from Project Number 1159 to Project Number 2130 so that the drainage works can be undertaken in conjunction with the shoulder reconstruction works.

The stormwater that is discharging from private properties in the vicinity is secondary to the fundamental drainage difficulties and will be pursued with the property owners with a view to minimising this additional runoff into the Franklin Road reserve.

Statutory Compliance

Private property owners are required to contain stormwater within their property in accordance with Clause 13.2 of the Private Property Local Law 2001 as adopted by Council at its meeting of 9 April 2002 (Item PD11-04/02 refers). The clause states as follows:

13.2 A person shall not allow storm water or other waste water to discharge onto:

(a) an adjoining lot without the current approval of the adjoining owner; or

(b) on to a road reserve or other property under the care control and management of the local government without the approval of the local government.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

This report recommends the reallocation of funds between approved projects as part of the Roads to Recovery Programme and does not require the injection of additional funds to complete these projects.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. NOTES that the change in scope of works for the Franklin Road Shoulder Reconstruction Project to incorporate drainage upgrade works beyond the normal rural road standard in the section between Rome Road and Belgrade Road has resulted in an estimated shortfall in funding of $39,000 for this Roads to Recovery Programme approved project.

2. NOTES that the shortfall in funding from the Franklin Road Shoulder Reconstruction Project is to be funded from the Roads to Recovery Programme through budget savings on roadworks associated with the Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive Road Construction Project, giving rise to the following budget amendment:

Project No	From	To	Description
1159	$65,000		Caffagio Crescent and Senario Drive
2130		$39,000	Franklin Road

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Corporate Services

14. Rates Charges - Review Of Policy

File Ref: 28458

File Name: BBRatCha.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 02 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the review of the City’s Rates Charges Policy and adopt the amended Policy.

Background

The current policy was implemented on 1 July 1999 and was due for review on 1 July 2000.

Detail

A review of the policy has now been completed. The review highlighted some inconsistencies between the Policy and the Local Government Act 1995 (and associated regulations). The proposed amended Policy is now consistent with the requirements of all relevant legislation and will in future be referred to as the Rates and Service Charges Policy.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

Nil.

Statutory Compliance

The amended Policy is consistent with the relevant provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 and the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Revised Policy No. FP4 “Rates and Service Charges” is consistent with legislative requirements.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the replacement of the existing Policy No. FP4 Rates Charges with the revised Policy No. FP4 “Rates and Service Charges” as detailed hereunder:-

5.1.4 Rates and Service Charges

Policy Number FP4

Policy Owner: Director Corporate Services

Distribution: All employees

Implementation: [Date of meeting and Item No.]

Scheduled Review: 1 July 2003

Objective

To establish a standard for charges relating to rates and service charges in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 and the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

Statement

The following payment options, time frames, discounts, charges and interest rates shall apply to rates and service charges.

Option	Admin Charge	Late payment Interest Charge	Incentive	Due dates
Pay in full	Nil	N/a	Yes	21 days following issue of rate notice
Pay in full	Nil	N/a	No	35 days following issue of rate notice
2 equal instalments	Yes – 1 only	Yes	No	35 days following issue of rate notice; and 63 days after due date of 1st instalment
4 equal instalments	Yes – 3 only	Yes	No	35 days following issue of rate notice; 63 days after due date of 1st instalment; 63 days after due date of 2nd instalment; 63 days after due date of 3^rd instalment;
Special Repayment Arrangements	Yes	Yes	No	As determined in agreement

An administration fee as adopted in the annual budget, together with an interest charge, not greater than the maximum rate of interest allowed under Regulation 68 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, is applicable. Such interest is to be calculated in accordance with Regulation 69 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, being on a simple interest basis by applying the rate of interest imposed by the local government to the amount of each instalment for the period between the due date of the first instalment and the due date of each subsequent instalment.

Special Repayment Arrangements

In accordance with the provisions of Section 6.49 of the Local Government Act 1995, the Chief Executive Officer may enter into special payment arrangements with ratepayers for the payment of rates and service charges. An administration fee per assessment as adopted in the annual budget will apply for each payment arrangement.

Responsibility for Implementation

Manager Finance

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

15. Collection Of Rates And Service Charges

File Ref: 26174

File Name: BBColofR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by A Binnie Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To endorse a policy for the collection of rates and services charges levied under the Local Government Act 1995.

Background

In accordance with Section 6.56 of the Local Government Act 1995, the City has the ability to recover unpaid rates and service charges through legal proceedings.

While the City does not currently have a formalised policy for the collection of outstanding rates and service charges, there are a number of practices and procedures in place to recover the amounts involved. The purpose of this policy is to formally establish a standard for the recovery of outstanding rates and service charges.

Detail

Under Goal 4 of the City’s Strategic Plan, Corporate Management and Development, the Corporate Services Directorate has listed “Maintain an equitable rating system” as an objective. In achieving this objective, the City will aim to maximise income by reducing rates outstanding at year-end.

The introduction of a Debt Recovery Policy will assist the City in achieving its goal and provide the City’s staff with a clearly defined policy in regard to the recovery of rates and service charges.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

The City’s administration already adheres to an informal set of internal policies and practices to recover outstanding rates and service charges. The proposed policy, if adopted, will merely formalise the current arrangements.

Statutory Compliance

The proposed policy for the collection of rates and service charges complies with the relevant requirements of the Local Government Act 1995.

Strategic Implications

The proposed policy is in accordance with Goal 4 Corporate Management and Development and the Corporate Services Directorate objective “Maintain an equitable rating system”.

Policy Implications

The proposed policy seeks to formalise practices already in place to recover outstanding rates and service charges.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the Collection of Rates and Service Charges Policy, as detailed hereunder:-

COLLECTION OF RATES AND SERVICE CHARGES

Policy Owner: Director Corporate Services

Distribution: All employees

Implementation: [Date of meeting and Item No]

Scheduled Review: 1 July 2003

Objective

To establish a formal standard for the recovery of outstanding rates and charges levied under the Local Government Act 1995.

Statement

The following process is to be followed for the recovery of outstanding rates and service charges. Legal proceedings will continue until payment of the rates and service charges are made in full.

1. Issue Final Notices

A Final Notice is to be issued 14 days after the due date, to those persons who have made either no payment, or insufficient payment to cover the first instalment. The Final Notice is to specify that the ratepayer/s have seven (7) days to pay in full or to enter into a special repayment arrangement.

Final Notices are not to be issued to eligible persons registered to receive the pensioner rebate under the Rates and Charges (Rebates and Deferments) Act 1992 as such persons have until 30 June of each year to make payment, without incurring any late payment penalties.

2. Notice of Intention to Summons

A Notice of Intention to Summons is to be issued within 28 days after the due date to those persons who did not respond appropriately to the Final Notice. The Notice of Intention to Summons is to specify that the ratepayer/s have fourteen (14) days to pay in full or to enter into a special repayment arrangement – failure to do so will result in a summons being issued without further notice.

3. Issue of a Summons

3.1 A Summons is to be issued through the Northern Suburbs Bailiff, which area of responsibility includes the City of Wanneroo, if no response is received in relation to the Notice of Intention to Summons. In accordance with Section 6.56 of the Local Government Act 1995, Summons fees are to be debited to the ratepayer/s account.

3.2 Ratepayers are required to either pay the full amount on the Summons or pay by instalments. If they chose to pay by instalments, they must sign the Confession of Debt on the reverse of the Summons and enter the amount they agree to pay in each instalment. Such instalments are subject to acceptance by the Rates Supervisor, City of Wanneroo.

3.3 If the Confession of Debt is not returned after fourteen (14) days of the issue of a Summons, a letter is to be sent requesting the ratepayer/s complete the Confession of Debt and return it to the City within seven (7) days. If, after the further period of seven (7) days, the Confession of Debt is not returned to the City, a Warrant of Execution is to be issued.

3.4 If an installment payment is received from a ratepayer/s but the Confession of Debt has not been returned to the City, a letter is sent requesting that the Confession of Debt be completed and returned to the City.

3.5 When the Confession of Debt is received, it must be checked to ensure that it has been duly signed and witnessed. If not signed or witnessed, it must be returned requesting that the Confession of Debt be duly completed.

3.6 If the Confession of Debt has been completed correctly, a repayment arrangement is to be entered into so long as the proposed repayment arrangement is acceptable to the City. This is to ensure that the debt is recovered within a reasonable timeframe. A letter is sent confirming acceptance of the repayment arrangement.

3.7 If the proposed repayment arrangement is not acceptable to the City, a letter is sent advising that the proposed arrangement is not sufficient to repay the debt in a reasonable time and requesting the ratepayer/s to contact the City’s Rating Services staff. Staff discretion is required when contact is made as some ratepayer/s are in genuine financial difficulty and may be unable to pay more that what was proposed on their Confession of Debt.

3.8 If payment of the Summons is received, but no Confession of Debt returned, and there is a small balance owing or the legal fees have not been paid, a letter is to be sent advising of same and requesting payment.

3.9 If the repayment arrangement, as agreed on the Confession of Debt, is not honoured, a letter is to be sent advising that the repayment is overdue and advising that if payment is not received by the agreed date, a Warrant of Execution will be issued.

4. Non-Service of Summons

4.1 When a Summons is unable to be served, a Non-Service of Summons will be issued by the Bailiff. The Bailiff may advise if the property is a rental property or will provide an alternative address for the summons to be re-issued.

4.2 If the property is a rental property, the property agent is to be contacted to ascertain the new address. If the property agent is responsible for payment of the rates, the address is to be changed and a new rate notice is to be sent to the property agent for payment.

4.3 If a new address is supplied, the new address is to be recorded. A letter is sent, informing the owner/s of the summons and if not responded to within seven (7) days Council will re-issue the summons.

5. Warrant of Execution

5.1 If the ratepayer/s has not responded to the Summons, a Warrant of Execution is to be issued fourteen (14) days after the date of issue of the Summons. The Warrant of Execution is also processed through the Northern Suburbs Bailiff.

5.2 The Warrant of Execution is a goods Warrant in the first instance and if the warrant is returned Nulla Bona (no goods), then a land warrant is to be issued.

5.3 Where a Warrant involves land where the owner resides, the approval of Council to be obtained before the land Warrant is lodged. Warrants against land may be used to collect outstanding rates and service charges in respect of investment properties without a requirement that these be referred to Council.

6. Section 6.64 – Sale of Land

If any rates and charges which are due to Council in respect of any rateable land have been unpaid for at least 3 years, Council may take possession of the land under the provisions of Section 6.64 of the Local Government Act 1995. The approval of Council is to be obtained before this course of action is undertaken.

7. Section 6.60 – Seizure of Rent for Non Payment of Rates

Where the owner of a leased or rented property, on which rates and service charges are outstanding, cannot be located or refuses to settle rates and service charges owed, a notice may be served on the lessee or tenant under the provisions of Section 6.60 of the Local Government Act 1995, requiring the lessee or tenant to pay to the City the rent due under the lease/tenancy agreement as it becomes due, until the amount in arrears has been paid. The Manager Finance has delegated authority to implement the provisions of Section 6.60.

Responsibility for Implementation

Manager Finance.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Community Development

16. Request Permission To Keep Three Dogs - 15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen

File Ref: 48018

File Name: AAReqPer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Kelly Edmonds Date 01 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Kelly Edmonds Date 01 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

That Council gives consideration to an application for exemption to Council’s Local Laws made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs at 15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen.

Background

Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 stipulates:

A person shall not keep or permit to be kept on any premises more than:

a) 2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age; or

b) 6 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the premises are situated within a rural area or comprise a lot in a special rural area having an area of 4 hectares or more;

unless the premise is licensed as an approved kennel establishment or has been granted an exemption pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act and have planning approval under the town planning scheme.

Detail

The following application has been made under the Dog Act and is submitted for consideration:

Address of Applicant

Description of Dogs

15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen

female cream Pekingese

female black Toy Miniature Poodle

male red and brown Staffordshire Bull Terrier

A Council Ranger has inspected the property to ensure that means exist on the premise at which the dog will ordinarily be kept for effectively confining the dogs within that premise.

The property, 15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen is zoned residential.

Consultation

Five residents adjoining the applicant’s property have been consulted by letter, to ascertain if they have any objections. No responses have been received within the comments period.

Comment

In considering this application for exemption, the following two options are available:

a) Council may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976, subject to conditions;

b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.

Given that no objections have been received and there are means that exist on the property to confine the dogs within the premise, it is recommended that an exemption be granted subject to the following conditions:

a) If any of the dogs die or are no longer kept on the property, no replacement dogs are to be obtained;

b) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum;

c) This permission may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered to be reasonable.

If Council decides to refuse permission, the applicant may appeal to the Hon Minister for Local Government. The Minister may approve the request on appeal and the City would not be able to impose conditions as recommended.

Statutory Compliance

The application for exemption to Council’s Local Laws made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 has been detailed in this report.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. GRANTS an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to the applicant at 15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen subject to the conditions listed below:

i) If any of the dogs die or are no longer kept on the property, no replacement dogs are to be obtained;

ii) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum;

iii) This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered reasonable.

2. RESERVES THE RIGHT to vary or revoke, at any future date, the exemption given to the applicant should any relevant conditions be contravened.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

17. Wa Sporting Car Club - Sub Lease

File Ref: 06594

File Name: BAWASpoC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by bj Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by mick Date 02 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To seek Council’s approval of a Deed of Licence between the WA Sporting Car Club and the State of Western Australia which permits the WA Police Service to use a portion of the Barbagello Raceway in Wattle Avenue Pinjar.

Background

The WA Sporting Car Club (Club) has recently negotiated a 21 year lease agreement with the City for land vested with the City of Wanneroo, being portion of Reserve 10866 (Barbagello Raceway) on Wattle Avenue Pinjar.

The lease agreement provides the lessee power to assign or sublet in accordance with section 3.24 of the lease, which states:

· The Lessee shall not assign, sublet or part with the possession of the Premises and the Lease without the prior written consent of the Lessor and it is HEREBY DECLARED that sections 80 of the property Law Act 1969 are expressly excluded.

· Where the Land is Crown land, the prior written consent of the Minister for Lands is required under subclause (1) in addition to the consent of the Lessor.

· The Lessee shall not mortgage, encumber or charge the Premises or the Lease.

Correspondence received by the City from the WA Sporting Car Club on 24^th April 2002 advises that the Club has drawn a solicited Deed of Licence between the WA Sporting Car Club and the State of Western Australia, which requires endorsement from Council (Lessor).

The Club has developed the land and constructed a racetrack together with accompanying facilities including a timing tower, air conditioned office and change rooms with shower amenities. The WA Police Service requires the use of these facilities from time to time and has therefore entered into a Deed of Licence arrangement with the Club subject to approval from DOLA and Council.

The Minister for Lands has granted consent to this Deed of Licence.

Detail

The WA Sporting Car Club (Lessee) has agreed to sub-lease portion of Reserve 10866 (Barbagello Raceway) to the WA Police Service for the purpose of driver training, through a Deed of Licence agreement.

The sub-lease is for 52 days during a period of 1 year from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003. The 52 days are to be taken as 1 weekday of each week during that year (except that the 52 days may be taken at other times where agreed to by both parties from time to time).

The sub-lease will allow the WA Police Service to have limited exclusive use of the following facilities:

a) race track, air conditioned office and change rooms including shower amenities, and

b) garage number 55.

Comment

The Club had negotiated a sub-lease arrangement with the WA Police Service prior to negotiating a new lease agreement with the City. Therefore in order to comply with the new lease, the Club is required to seek endorsement from Council to renew the existing arrangement.

The Lessee applies to Council to endorse this sub-lease on an annual basis. This requires a report to be prepared for Council which includes exactly the same information with the exception of the dates. Therefore it is feasible to recommend that this approval remains valid until the lease expires on the 30^th September 2022.

Statutory Compliance

The Hon Minister for Lands approval for the sub-lease of portion of the subject Reserve 10866 has been granted.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the request from the WA Sporting Car Club (Lessee) to sub-lease portion of Reserve 10866 (Barbagello Raceway) to the WA Police Service, as per the Deed of Licence and that this approval remains valid until the expiry of the Lease on 30^th September 2022.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

18. Tafe Contract

File Ref: 22100

File Name: BATAFCON.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by bj Date 30 April 2002

Level 1 Approval by yvette Date 30 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

That Council considers inviting tenders for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses utilising the City’s recreation centres.

Background

The City of Wanneroo has been providing leisure courses from the Gumblossom, Wanneroo and Hainsworth Recreation Centres since 1976. The leisure courses take the form of hobby and/or educational courses and are conducted four terms of the year from each of these centres.

Up until 2000, the leisure courses were operated in-house by the City of Wanneroo. The deficit incurred by the City in operating these courses was approximately $80,000pa ($84,328 in 1999). As a result of the ongoing costs it was decided to further investigate the alternative options for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses. During 1999 an evaluation was commissioned in relation to potential programme partnering arrangements involving the City of Wanneroo and other providers of similar or like services. The evaluation detailed specific costs in relation to the provision of courses from the City’s recreation centres and approaches were made to potential providers in order to seek their comments, views and interest in being involved with the City of Wanneroo activities.

The conclusion of the evaluation based on quality, cost and diminishing resources was that Council should seek alternative management of the leisure course programmes from City facilities.

Expressions of interest in the form of tenders were sought for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses utilising the City’s recreation centres via external providers. The scope of the tender, in generic terms, requested that potential providers demonstrate their ability to provide the same amount of courses, at very similar prices, times etc, as to the City’s provision. In addition it was requested that low-income earners, particularly those that access Council’s concession rates for these services, not be disadvantaged by the provision of another management body.

Seven companies and or organisations requested the tender documents, however at the close of tenders only one submission was received. The tender received was from the West Coast College of TAFE. In assessing the tender based on the criteria provided, West Coast College of TAFE met and exceeded the requirements of the tender. West Coast College of TAFE were awarded the tender for one year with a one-year option as of 14 February 2000. With a further extension the current contract will expire in June 2002.

Detail

In 1999 the City of Wanneroo conducted 285 programmes with 2838 participants. Since West Coast College of TAFE has taken over the management the numbers are as follows (please refer to attached statistics for further information – Attachment 1);

2000 – 161 classes run, 1178 participants,

2001 – 111 classes run, 1124 participants

Although the numbers of participants have markedly reduced, there are many outside factors that have contributed. These are as follows;

· The costs for the courses were increased. The courses previously run by the City were not recovering costs and contributed to the large deficit.

· Local community groups are running courses at a cheaper cost using voluntary instructors.

· A large proportion of the leisure course participants are women. Women are increasingly returning to the work force, therefore the demand for leisure courses is decreasing.

· The demand for leisure courses has decreased throughout many facilities within the metropolitan area. For example the City’s closest competitor the Ocean Ridge Community Centre has had a reduction in their participants by 50% over the last two years.

· The number of participants was already declining prior to West Coast College of TAFE managing the courses.

Consultation

Consultation has been undertaken with affected City Staff, West Coast College of TAFE, and other leisure course providers within the metropolitan area. All statistics have been provided by West Coast College of TAFE which has conducted customer questionnaires over the last two years.

Comment

As can be seen from the statistics, there is a decrease in the number of people participating in Leisure Courses at City of Wanneroo Facilities. The demand for leisure courses throughout the Northern suburbs however is also declining. Should the City wish to revert back to providing these courses in-house there would need to be a staff restructure and the additional cost of the courses would need to be assessed and included within the Budget. There is still a demand for Leisure courses in the local community and an outside organisation such as West Coast College of TAFE is better equipped to manage this programme as the provision of adult and children’s courses is their core business.

City administration acknowledges that the partnership between West Coast College of TAFE and the City of Wanneroo has been successful in the efficient and effective provision of leisure courses to the community. It is therefore recommended that the City invite tenders for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses utilising the City’s recreation centres free of charge.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Healthy Communities, 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The current contract arrangement requires the City to provide 1,050 hours per term of available time in its facilities to West Coast College of TAFE at a total cost of approximately $9,975 per term. In addition the City is required to contribute $1.00 per participant to an asset preservation fund for replacement of carpets, curtains, equipment and other replacement items deemed necessary by the City, which is approximately $20,000pa. It is important to note that West Coast College of TAFE contributes $2.00 per participant into the asset preservation fund.

The maximum cost to Council is approximately $60 000pa, although it is unlikely that the full complement of hours will ever be utilised. West Coast College of TAFE currently utilise approximately one-quarter of their available time. These costs are an opportunity cost as if the facilities were not used by West Coast College of TAFE they would not necessarily earn income from other users.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council INVITES tenders for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses utilising the City’s recreation centres free of charge to a maximum of:

Wanneroo Recreation Centre 400 hours per term

Gumblossom Community Centre 200 hours per term

Hainsworth Leisure Centre 200 hours per term

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

SPECIFICATION AND SCOPE OF WORKS

1 INTRODUCTION

The Principal requires the Contractor to enter into a partnership with the Principal for the provision of leisure courses from various community facilities.

2 SCOPE OF WORKS

The contractor shall provide adult and youth leisure programs from various community facilities, particularly the Gumblossom Community Centre, Wanneroo Recreation Centre and the Hainsworth Leisure Centre during the Contract Period. The contractor shall keep the income generated from the Contract programs.

3 BACKGROUND

The current contract for the provision of leisure courses from various community facilities will expire on the 30 June 2002. The Principal is therefore seeking tenders to continue this service.

4 RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR

The Contractor shall:

a) Prepare the adult and youth leisure service programme;

b) Contribute $2.00 per participant and the Principal shall contribute $1 per participant into

an asset management fund for replacement of carpets, curtains, equipment and other

replacements items as the Principal deems necessary;

c) Continue to provide adult and children/teen leisure courses;

d) Introduce newer/in demand programs at their discretion. Program content will not require

decision making by the Principal;

e) Ensure that the Principal is recognised on all marketing material as a partner involving

any of its facilities in relation to this Contract;

f) Be responsible for all aspects of human resource management and liability insurance,

workers compensation etc;

g) Be responsible for provision and payment of all program instructors;

h) Make available the provision of a designated computer lab at Wanneroo Recreation

Centre. Any equipment or associated cost shall be at the Contractors expense;

i) Arrange and pay for all advertising and marketing of programs;

j) Provide regular quality performance reports and any other statistical data as specified by

the Superintendent;

k) Manage all bookings, calls, complaints, payments, refunds etc utilising its own

infrastructure and personnel;

l) Pay the principal for any costs in relation to Council caretakers locking or opening

facilities outside their scheduled times;

m) Ensure the times and duration of all leisure courses remain similar to the existing

structure, unless otherwise approved by the Superintendent;

n) Ensure the range and content of leisure courses remain similar to the existing structure,

unless otherwise approved by the superintendent;

o) Manage and administer all personnel associated with provision of leisure courses with the

exception of the Principal employees;

p) Make a provision for leisure area preparation at the beginning and cleaning of area at

conclusion of program activities;

q) Provide insurance and public liability cover in accordance with this Contract and statutory

requirements and regulations;

5 RESPONSIBILITIES OF PRINCIPAL

In order for Principal to maintain and improve customer service levels in the delivery of leisure programs the Prinicpal will;

a) Provide 400 hours per term at Wanneroo Recreation centre, 200 hours per term at

Gumblossom Community Centre and 200 hours per term at Hainsworth Leisure Centre

free of charge. Based on a community hire rate of $10.60 per hour this equates to $8 480 of facility hire charges per term. Above this base hourly usage, facilities will be hired out in accordance with the Principal’s annual schedule of fees and charges.

b) Provide access to basic equipment located at the Leisure Centre’s owned by the City of

Wanneroo. Any specialised equipment over and above this requirement shall be at cost to

the Contractor.

6 PRICING SCHEDULE

The Contractor shall ensure pricing of all leisure courses remain similar to the existing price structure unless otherwise approved by the Superintendent.

The following statistics are provided for the Contractor’s information

19. Quinns Rocks Tennis Club - Provision Of Two Additional Tennis Courts

File Ref: 14145

File Name: BAQuiRoc.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by bj Date 30 April 2002

Level 1 Approval by Simon Kot Date 30 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

That Council considers a request from the Quinns Rocks Tennis Club for the provision of two additional tennis courts at Gumblossom Park, Quinns Rocks.

Background

A 296 signature petition was tabled at the 9 April 2002 Ordinary Council meeting on behalf of the Quinns Rocks Tennis Club in support of this development.

Detail

Gumblossom Park located in Quinns Rocks is an important district recreational space catering for a variety of active and passive users. The park includes 4 tennis courts located at the rear of Gumblossom Community Centre being available for community and Club use.

The Quinns Rocks Tennis Club (QRTC) as principal user of this facility utilises Gumblossom Park to coordinate its competitions and operations. The QRTC is a developing sporting organisation that provides social and pennant tennis competitions for residents of Quinns Rocks and the surrounding district. The QRTC consider Council’s provision of four tennis courts is insufficient to accommodate the demands of the Club during peak weekday and weekend times.

The QRTC book the four tennis courts at various times throughout the week. In most instances bookings are made for 2-hour periods and all four courts are utilised. The public books the courts on average twice a day when the courts are not being utilised by the QRTC.

The City within a 5 km radius of Gumblossom Park provides no other community use tennis courts. Developer Mirvac Fini is constructing two community use tennis courts on Bellport Parade, Mindarie located 1km from Gumblossom Park. These courts are due for completion in June 2002 at which time Council will become responsible for coordination of bookings.

Comment

City Officers recognise that the Quinns Rocks Tennis Clubs development is limited by the ability of the Club to access sufficient tennis courts. City Administration does not consider the provision of additional tennis courts a high priority at this stage and funding sources have not been pursued for this project.

City Officers have assessed the concept plan (Attachment 1) submitted by the QRTC indicating the proposed site of the two new tennis courts.

Whilst the southern court has sufficient space to construct a tennis court, subject to the installation of a retaining wall, the northern court would require removal or replacement of existing infrastructure, trees and footpaths.

Further detailed investigation is recommended in order to determine an appropriate long-term strategy accounting for court location, funding and further club requirements such as clubrooms prior to committing to the provision of additional infrastructure within Gumblossom Park.

As a result City Administration recommends that the QRTC utilise the newly constructed Mindarie Tennis Courts until a suitable long-term strategy for the provision of tennis courts in this district is provided.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The provision of sporting infrastructure such as tennis courts is congruent with Council’s Strategic Plan, Goal 2.6, provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. RECOMMENDS that the Quinns Rocks Tennis Club utilise the two new tennis courts in Mindarie.

2. AGREES IN PRINCIPLE to the need for additional tennis courts in the district subject to;

a) Detailed investigation of an appropriate location

b) Consultation with the Quinns Rocks Tennis Club to determine future Club requirements and potential funding sources.

3. LISTS this project for consideration in the Capital Works Program subject to the outcomes of Item 2.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

20. Application For Determination Of Unmet Medical Need - Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Clarkson, Merriwa And Butler

File Ref: 06013

File Name: EAAPPFOR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 02 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 02 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Council is requested to endorse an application to the WA Health Department of behalf of the localities of Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Clarkson, Merriwa and Butler for the determination of unmet medical need.

Background

At present, general practitioners within the medical industry in Australia are required to be Australian residents with appropriate qualifications in order to provide services to the public that are eligible for Medicare rebates.

This situation has caused particular issues for principally rural and remote areas of the country that are unable to obtain the services of an Australian doctor, either due to a shortage of appropriately trained practitioners or their level of isolation which may not encourage doctors to settle in the area.

In recognition of this potential shortage of medical practitioners, the Federal and State Governments operate an application process for the classification of a locality as an area of unmet medical need, which may allow for an overseas trained doctor to provide services to an area.

Under this process, the State Government receives applications from localities addressing a number of criteria, which assist in the determination, classification, and gazettal (by the WA Minister for Health) of an area of unmet medical need.

If a locality is determined by the State Government to be an area of unmet medical need, their application is forwarded to the Federal Government for determination of the provision of a provider number for the area. If a provider number is issued, it will allow an overseas trained practitioner (with appropriate “crossover” qualifications) to provide services in the locality that are eligible for a Medicare rebate.

Detail

Whilst the unmet medical need process was principally established for rural and remote Australian communities, an additional category has been added to the process to assess applications from fringe metropolitan areas, experiencing a rapidly expanding population with special needs and demonstrated difficulty in recruiting or retaining GP services.

In both 2000 and 2001, the City submitted, in conjunction with the Yanchep-Two Rocks Community Support Working Group, an application for an unmet medical need classification in the Yanchep/Two Rocks area.

In both instances, this application was approved, and these localities have recently been allocated a provider number from the Federal Government. This number will allow for the overseas trained doctor presently servicing the area to remain for a period of up to five years and offer patients services eligible for a Medicare rebate.

During April 2002, the City was approached by doctors and staff of the Mindarie Medical Centre regarding a doctor shortage currently affecting the localities of Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Merriwa, Clarkson and Butler.

Following this approach, a meeting was held involving all doctors currently servicing the locality and elected representatives, to determine the applicability of criteria currently used to determine unmet medical need.

During this meeting, the following features of the medical situation in the area were highlighted:

· The availability of approximately 11.4 full time doctors and 513 consulting hours throughout the area each week, which converts to a doctor/patient ratio of between 1:1811 to 1:2234 residents, depending upon population projections. This type of ratio is far in excess of normally accepted levels, which are between 1:900 persons and 1:1500 persons depending on the nature of the locality and the characteristics of the population

· The existing practice situation, where all available medical appointments on a particular day are normally booked by 9am, therefore necessitating a referral service to other doctors south of the locality or the Emergency Department of the Joondalup Health Campus

· The lack of an after hours service operating in the area – the current locum service provided under the auspices of the Australian Medical Association does not operate north of Burns Beach Road

· The lack of response to advertisements to recruit Australian doctors to the area – according to the doctors involved, current advertisements in a wide range of publications and media are not attracting any potential applicants (as opposed to unsuitable applicants), due to an underlying shortage of trained practitioners across the State and Australia as a whole

Given these factors and their applicability to the selection criteria for determination of unmet medical need, an application has been prepared and is attached (Attachment 1).

Consultation

As noted, consultation with doctors and staff across the locality has been undertaken in the preparation of this application.

A petition organised by one of the local doctors in conjunction with an elected representative is also currently available throughout the localities. It is anticipated that this petition will be presented to the appropriate State Minister, supporting an application for unmet medical need.

Comment

Council endorsement for this application is sought, in order to provide official recognition of the critical medical needs and shortages currently affecting this locality.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

This type of advocacy for localities applying to State and Federal Governments for support is in line with the general strategic direction of Council and their support for the creation of Healthy Communities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ENDORSES AND SUPPORTS an application to the WA Health Department for the Determination of Unmet Medical Need from the localities of Quinns Rocks, Mindarie, Clarkson, Butler and Merriwa

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

Introduction

This application has been prepared by the City of Wanneroo, in conjunction with doctors from the localities of Clarkson, Merriwa, Quinns Rocks, Mindarie and Butler, for a determination regarding unmet medical need in the area.

It will outline vital statistics, the current medical/general practice situation in the area, and detail issues for consideration noted in Health Department of Western Australia Guidelines for the Determination of Unmet Need.

Vital Statistics

Clarkson, Merriwa, Quinns Rocks, Mindarie and Butler are adjacent suburbs located on the east and west sides of Marmion Avenue, approximately 31 kilometres from Perth City Centre.

Each of these suburbs have experienced significant residential growth over the past 5 years and constitute the far northern metropolitan fringe, with the locality of Butler one of the newest suburbs of Perth, established late in 2001.

The area contains a mix of private and public residential housing development, with significant portions of Merriwa and Quinns Rocks dedicated to public housing. Two major retirement villages, providing both independent and hostel accommodation, currently exist in Merriwa (Cambrai Village and RAAFA Estate) with another complex (Harbourside Village) in Mindarie is due to commence operations in 2002.

Due to the high levels of growth in these areas between Census years (1996 and 2001), the expected release of 2001 Census figures in June 2002 will provide a complete breakdown of population characteristics and numbers.

There are, however, some reliable projections regarding the population in this area, which are summarised on the following pages, providing comparisons with 1996 Census figures where available.

Population Figures

1996 Census

2001 Estimate

Ministry for Planning

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

Butler

Total

3835

1198

3691

2941

N/A

11 665

5483

4680

5217

3762

1500

20 642

Residential Growth Rates

1996-2002/03

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

Butler

Overall growth rate

43.0%

290.7%

41.3%

30.0%

N/A

77.0%

Projected population

2031

(Ministry for Planning)

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa (including Ridgewood)

Butler

Total

10 713

8487

4870

8543

13 256

45 869

Age Cohorts

1996 Census

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

0-14 years: 40.0%

15-24 years: 12.6%

25-44 years: 40.4%

45-59 years: 7.4%

Over 60 years: 3.7%

0-14 years: 27.8%

15-24 years: 10.4%

25-44 years: 36.7%

45-59 years: 17.6%

Over 60 years: 7.5%

0-14 years: 29.2%

15-24 years: 13.6%

25-44 years: 34.0%

45-59 years: 13.9%

Over 60 years: 9.4%

0-14 years: 35.6%

15-24 years: 11.6%

25-44 years: 36.9%

45-59 years: 8.3%

Over 60 years: 7.5%

Birthplace (Main Countries)

1996 Census

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

Australia 62.5%

United Kingdom 20.8%

New Zealand 3.5%

Poland 1.3%

Malaysia 0.8%

Australia 51.3%

United Kingdom 30.7%

New Zealand 3.1%

South Africa 1.6%

Australia 65.1%

United Kingdom 19.2%

New Zealand 3.4%

USA 0.9%

South Africa 0.7%

Germany 0.7%

Australia 64.3%

United Kingdom 19.4%

New Zealand 4.5%

South Africa 0.6%

Chile 0.6%

Poland 0.5%

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Population

1996 Census

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

Total

57 persons

3 persons

63 persons

37 persons

160 persons (approximately 1.4% population)

Unemployment Rate

1996 Census

Clarkson

Mindarie

Quinns Rocks

Merriwa

City of Wanneroo

Western Australia

10.0%

8.3%

12.1%

12.6%

11.6%

8.1%

Socio Economic Status

1996 Census

Clarkson

Nil or negative weekly income

Weekly individual income under $300

Weekly individual income between $300 and $500

Weekly individual income between $500 and $1000

Weekly individual income over $1000

Income not stated

Mindarie

Nil or negative weekly income

Weekly individual income under $300

Weekly individual income between $300 and $500

Weekly individual income between $500 and $1000

Weekly individual income over $1000

Income not stated

Quinns Rocks

Nil or negative weekly income

Weekly individual income under $300

Weekly individual income between $300 and $500

Weekly individual income between $500 and $1000

Weekly individual income over $1000

Income not stated

Merriwa

Nil or negative weekly income

Weekly individual income under $300

Weekly individual income between $300 and $500

Weekly individual income between $500 and $1000

Weekly individual income over $1000

Income not stated

5.5%

37.8%

23.6%

27.0%

2.0%

4.2%

7.9%

30.6%

19.9%

29.7%

6.5%

5.4%

6.4%

38.3%

21.3%

15.3%

3.5%

5.7%

6.5%

39.2%

21.5%

26.0%

2.4%

4.3%

The Current General Practice Situation

A profile the current General Practice situation in the locality is detailed below

Medical Centres/General Practitioners

Mindarie Medical Centre (410 consulting hours per week), Quinns Rocks

Anchorage Medical Centre (Sole Practitioner), Mindarie

Dr E L Walker (Sole Practitioner), Quinns Rocks

Dr Teresa Pollard (Sole Practitioner – RAAFA Estate)

Consulting Hours available per week

513 (excepting holidays and sick leave)

Patient/Doctor Ratio

Range: 1811: 1 to 2234:1 dependent upon population projections used

Days of Week Medical Services Available

5.5 days – Monday to Saturday

Billing Arrangements

50% Bulk Billing

50% Private Billing

After Hours Services

Current metropolitan locum service does not provide medical services to the area – boundary of metropolitan services Burns Beach Road Iluka, approximately 4 kilometres south of Mindarie

A small proportion of existing doctors do provide a fee for service and travel after hours call out facility

Majority of patients with after hours needs visit Joondalup Health Campus Emergency Department, approximately 10-12kms south of the locality

Complementary Medical Services Available

Physiotherapy, Mindarie

Dental Services, Mindarie and Quinns Rocks

Pathology Services, Quinns Rocks

Adolescent Mental Health Service, Clarkson (referral based)

Hospital Services

Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup (10-12kms south of localities)

Emergency Department, Private and Public Hospital facilities and complementary services

Nearest “next” GP Service

Private Billing – Beaumaris (approximately 8 kms south)

Bulk Billing – Beldon (approximately 15 kms south)

Training Practices

One – Mindarie Medical Centre, Quinns Rocks

Relief/Locum Service Availability

None available – sole practitioners at present unable to take annual leave/sick leave without closing surgeries

Issues for Consideration

Population Factors/Geography

The population of the area, at present as well as in terms of projected growth, does indicate a critical need for the provision of additional GP Services.

An overall growth rate of approximately 77% in the 6 years from 1996-2002 is indicative of rapid change and the development of entire new suburbs or communities within the locality.

At present, the ratio of residents to doctors is, utilising a best case scenario, 1:1811, and rising due to both the existing availability of residential land throughout these localities and the release of residential land for new suburbs, including Butler to the North.

If the population continues to grow at expected levels and doctor numbers remain steady, the resident to doctor ratio will extrapolate to the following levels:

Year

Projected Population of locality

Doctor/Patient Ratio

2006

27 668

2427:1

2011

36 408

3194:1

2016

40 686

3569:1

2021

45 044

3951:1

2026

46 449

4074:1

2031

49 569

4348:1

These projections do not include any new suburbs being developed to the north of Butler, where it is expected that there will be a further population influx of approximately 50,000 residents by the year 2031.

Whilst it may appear unrealistic to align population increases to a static GP situation, this has been the experience of existing practices in the area over the past 4-5 years – the population of the locality has increased in a similar manner to the projections noted above and doctor numbers have not increased.

Along with absolute population numbers, the characteristics of the population also contribute to General Practice requirements.

Although not registering significantly in the most recent population statistics available (1996 Census), the existing cultural mix of the area is changing to a more diverse population base, with both indigenous and CALD residents increasing as an overall proportion of the population.

Anecdotal evidence in support of this changing population mix include the operation of an Aboriginal Community Organisation (Ngala) from City of Wanneroo community facilities in Merriwa, that provides a range of services for Aboriginal families including a partnership with Community Health to encourage the attendance of Aboriginal families at Infant Health Clinics.

The socio-economic status of residents also affects doctor availability. As noted in statistics from the 1996 Census, a significant proportion of residents in all suburbs of the locality have an individual weekly income of less than $300.

An emergency relief centre has recently commenced operations in Merriwa (The Homestead Organisation), after receipt of funding from the Lotteries Commission in recognition of the socio-economic status of residents in this locality. City of Wanneroo financial relief services have also recently received an increase in funding for the provision of aid in these localities.

The Joondalup Youth Support Service will commence a youth specific emergency relief service in the area (funded by the Lotteries Commission) in the last half of 2002.

Given that approximately half of all general practice consulting hours in the area are privately billed, the availability of doctors becomes increasingly critical, in effect doubling the doctor patient ratio for those with low-income levels.

The presence of two major retirement villages and the development of another in the locality also increase the concentration of aged residents, who may require more regular general practitioner care. A resident doctor, supported by two doctors from the Mindarie Medical Centre who visit on certain days each week, currently services the two major villages. The resident doctor has, however, recently “closed books”, meaning that further strain will now be placed on locally available services.

The geography of the area also contributes to the current shortage of general medical services, given that physical infrastructure has been unable to match the growth rate of the locality.

When not able to secure an appointment locally, residents are referred to other GP services south of the area down the principal transport route, Marmion Avenue.

The next closest medical practice is located in Beaumaris (approximately 8-10 kilometres away), with the closest available bulk billing service (apart from the Emergency Department at Joondalup Health Campus) located at Belridge Shopping Centre, Beldon (approximately 15 kilometres away). Both of these practices are not readily accessible by public transport – bus routes to these areas are complicated (if available at all) and they are not located on the train line.

Health Service Criteria and Practice Issues

As noted in the Current General Practice Situation section of this application, the closest hospital servicing this locality is Joondalup Health Campus, which provides a full range of public and private hospital services and a 24-hour emergency department.

The campus is accessible by public transport (bus) from the subject suburbs, with ambulances also dispatched from Joondalup to cater for emergency situations.

The existing General Practitioner situation in the locality does, however, place a higher level of need on the Joondalup Emergency Department, with many patients travelling to the Department when not able to secure an appointment with existing services available locally.

GP Practices currently available in the locality range from one Medical Centre (employing around 11 doctors and providing 410 consulting hours per week) through to 3 sole practice services, one of which now has “closed books”.

Residential population pressure now means that the majority of appointments are scheduled before 9am each day, with urgent cases “squeezed in”, which places strain and pressure on working doctors, as well as increased waiting times for patients. Those patients that are unable to secure an appointment on the day or time they are seeking are referred to doctors further south down Marmion Avenue or to the Emergency Department of Joondalup Health Campus.

Existing sole practitioners in the area are at present without locum support, meaning that they are unable to take holidays or sick leave without closing their practice.

The Mindarie Medical Centre is a registered training practice, meaning that some relief is provided to permanent doctors when a trainee is in residence. The presence of these type of doctors does, however, create continuity difficulties for patients, as doctors leave after their 6 months training.

After hours medical services available within the area are in extremely short supply, with the boundary of the Perth Metropolitan locum service being at Burns Beach Road, some 4 kms south of the locality.

As a result, some doctors in the area do provide an on-call after hours service, however the fees associated with this service are high, meaning that is it not accessible to a large proportion of the existing residential population.

As noted, the mix of private and bulk billing in the area is currently standing at a ratio of 50:50.

The necessary infrastructure to support new doctors in the area (ie. Consulting rooms) is available, with both the Mindarie Medical Centre and a stand-alone practice currently having excess capacity. Subdivision plans for new commercial and retail centres in the area also indicate appropriate sites for the provision of Medical Centres, however Centres are yet to be constructed due to the lack of doctors available or willing to service the area.

Medical Practitioner Qualification, Training and Skill Mix

Doctors currently located in the area have expressed a need for generalist GP skills, catering for a wide range of common illnesses.

A high percentage of paediatric work is available in the area, meaning that a GP with specialist skills in this area (in addition to general practice skills) would also be beneficial.

Length of Stay – Previous Incumbents

It has been the general experience that most doctors starting practice in the area generally stay, with the majority of issues caused by the lack of doctors actually considering or moving to the area to establish or join a practice.

Retirement or natural attrition and maternity leave are currently reducing available medical services, with a significant number of female doctors who take maternity leave not returning to full time work.

Existing practices have been advertising for new doctors for between 2 and 4 years – dependent upon the year in which they were established.

Advertisements have been placed in the following publications on a regular basis:

· The West Australian Newspaper

· The Sun Herald Newspaper, Sydney

· The Melbourne Sun Newspaper, Melbourne

· Various professional magazines and journals (state national and international), including GPEA – Western Australia and Medical Forum. WA.

A selection of advertisements placed in these publications is attached to this application for further information.

In the vast majority of cases, advertisements are not attracting any applicants at all, as opposed to applicants with the right skill mix or experience.

Local Government Support

Administrative support has been provided by the City of Wanneroo in the preparation and lodging of this application.

A letter of support from the City is also attached, introducing this application and summarising the need currently being experienced for General Practitioner services in this locality.

Contact with AMA or other Locum Service

Existing doctors and practices within the locality have made contact with the AMA and locum services presently available.

Whilst the AMA has been understanding of the situation, the boundary of the present locum service (as noted) does not reach the locality.

A currently held belief is that Western Australia has a chronic shortage of trained doctors (with only one available training University), which is contributing to localities experiencing unmet medical need.

Other Special Considerations

Letters are attached from each of the practices currently established in the locality, detailing individual experiences and problems arising from unmet medical need.

Letters of support for this application are also attached (full list to be inserted at a later date).:

A petition (raised by local doctors and local government elected representatives) in support of the application has also been circulated within the localities involved and will be forwarded to the appropriate State Government Minister.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

21. May 2002 - Requests For Donations And The Waiver Of Fees And Charges

File Ref: 08032

File Name: EAMay200.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 06 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 03 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 03 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 6

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

That Council gives consideration to community requests for donations and the waiver of fees and charges for May 2002.

Background

Consideration of requests for donations and the waiver of fees and charges are at present undertaken on an individual merit basis.

In order to provide Council with the necessary information to determine each application, and an overall view of the impact of these allocations on the budget, a report is normally prepared considering all applications for each Council meeting.

Detail

During this period, the City has received 6 applications for donations. These applications have been received from:

· Radio Lollipop (Princess Margaret Hospital for Children)

· West Coast Christian Outreach Centre

· Foodbank Centre Appeal

· City of Wanneroo resident on behalf of her daughter’s school representation at an international level

· Seniors Golf Tournament, Marangaroo

· WA Special Needs Children’s Christmas Party

Each of these applications is summarised on the following pages, along with an assessment and recommendation. Letters of application are attached (see Attachments 1,2,3, 4, 5 & 6).

Item 1 Attendance

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item 3 Reports

1. Amendment To Regent Waters (South) Agreed Structure Plan – Backshall Place, Wanneroo

2. Amendment To East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (Madeley And Darch)

3. Proposed Amendment No 16 To District Planning Scheme No 2 To Recode Lot 645 (40) Greville Way, Girrawheen, From R20 To R30

4. Adoption Of A Local Structure Plan For Lot 201 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks

5. Proposed Signage Application For Lot 998 (981) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo

6. Development Application Determined By Delegated Authority For April 2002

7. Subdivision Applications Determined By Delegated Authority In April 2002

8. Consideration Of A Draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan

9. Unauthorised Land Use: Lot 7 (219) Mary Street, Wanneroo

10. Calvert Way, Girrawheen - Parking Prohibitions

11. Brazier Road, Yanchep - Speed Zone Review

12. 2002/2003 Metropolitan Regional Road Program

13. Franklin Road Shoulder Reconstruction Project

14. Rates Charges - Review Of Policy

15. Collection Of Rates And Service Charges

16. Request Permission To Keep Three Dogs - 15 Tendring Way, Girrawheen

17. Wa Sporting Car Club - Sub Lease

18. Tafe Contract

19. Quinns Rocks Tennis Club - Provision Of Two Additional Tennis Courts

20. Application For Determination Of Unmet Medical Need - Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Clarkson, Merriwa And Butler

21. May 2002 - Requests For Donations And The Waiver Of Fees And Charges

22. Adoption Of City Of Wanneroo Strategic Plan - Our People, Our Future 2002 - 2005

Item 4 To be tabled at the briefing

23. Proposed closure of Pedestrian Access Way between Kempton Grove & Connolly Drive, Clarkson

24. Proposed closure of Pedestrian Access Way between Seabrook Grove & Ainsbury Parade-Renshaw Boulevard, Clarkson

25. Proposed Single House – Lot 152 (135) Lakelands Drive, Gnangara

26. Lot 127 (15) Carinda Place, Alexander Heights – Parking of a Commercial Vehicle in the Front Setback

27. Lot 678 (16) Cox Crescent, Quinns Rocks – Two Storey Dwelling with Undercroft

28. Warrant of Payments for April 2002

29. Preferred Service Provider – Yanchep Community Centre

30. Renaming of Hudson Park Clubrooms – Girrawheen

31. Joondalup Regional Performing Arts Centre

32. Centenary Celebration – West Perth Football Club

Item 5 Closure

2000				2001
Wanneroo Recreation Centre				Wanneroo Recreation Centre
TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL	TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL
	OFFERED		STUDENTS		OFFERED		STUDENTS

Term 1	68	25	192	Term 1	57	23	374
Term 2	95	42	327	Term 2	45	19	166
Term 3	80	39	268	Term 3	45	21	154
Term 4	67	28	186	Term 4	38	20	150
Gumblossom Community Centre				Gumblossom Community Centre
TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL	TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL
	OFFERED		STUDENTS		OFFERED		STUDENTS
Term 1	20	6	47	Term 1	17	6	51
Term 2	29	2	11	Term 2	13	5	59
Term 3	21	9	71	Term 3	12	9	90
Term 4	15	6	48	Term 4	17	8	80
Hainsworth Leisure Centre				Hainsworth Leisure Centre

TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL	TERM	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL
	OFFERED		STUDENTS		OFFERED		STUDENTS

Term 1	23	1	6	Term 1	4	0	0
Term 2	24	1	7	Term 2	3	0	0
Term 3	20	2	15	Term 3	4	0	0
Term 4	15	0	0	Term 4	3	0	0
GRAND TOTAL	477	161	1178		258	111	1124


2002


CENTRE	CLASSES	CLASSES RAN	TOTAL
	OFFERED		STUDENTS


Wanneroo	44	17	126
Gumblossom	16	9	64
Hainsworth	3	0	0

TOTALS
TERM 1 ONLY	63	26	190