AGENDA

Item 1 Attendances

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item 3 Public Question Time

Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes

OC01-06/02 Minutes Of Ordinary Council Meeting Held On 27 June 2002

That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 27 June 2002 be confirmed.

Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without discussion

Item 6 Questions from elected members

Item 7 Petitions

New Petitions Presented

Update on Petitions

PT01-06/02 Cr Goodenough – Opening of Anchorage Drive

Cr Goodenough presented a petition signed by 472 residents of Mindarie objecting to the opening of Anchorage Drive, between Seaham Way & Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie and requesting that the area be left as a pathway and park.

ACTION

The Coordinators of the petition have been notified of Council’s resolution 11.06.02 Item TS07-06/02 – Anchorage Drive Reconstruction:

THAT Council ADVISES the petitioners that funds have been listed in the Draft 2002/2003 New Initiatives Consultancy Budget for the Mindarie Traffic Management Study.

PT02-06/02 Cr Loftus – Community Quilt

Cr Loftus presented a petition signed by 74 residents from Yanchep and Two Rocks requesting Council to hang a community quilt in the Phil Renkin Community Centre.

ACTION

A letter has been sent to the Quilters Club agreeing to hanging the quilt subject to them providing a suitable display case to protect it from insects and incidental damage.

Item 8 Reports

Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.

Cr Cvitan to declare a financial interest in Item PD11-07/02 due to having a possible interest in purchasing the property should Council decide to dispose of the property.

Cr Goodenough to declare a financial interest in Item TS05-07/02 due to ownership of a vacant block of land adjoining another vacant block of land on Coldstream Circuit also owned by a related party.

Planning and Development

Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans

PD01-07/02 Adoption Of Local Structure Plan For Lot 16 Connolly Drive, Clarkson

File Ref: 66897

File Name: BAAdoofL.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the adoption of a Local Structure Plan for Lot 16 Connolly Drive, Clarkson.

Applicant	Taylor Burrell
Owner	Landstart and Urban Pacific
Location	Lot 16 Connolly Drive, Clarkson
Site Area	Approx 120 hectares
MRS Zoning	Urban
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development

Background

Lot 16 is located on the eastern side of the Connolly Drive road reserve, south of the existing Clarkson High School and established Clarkson residential area (refer Attachment 1).

At its meeting of 6 November 2001 (item PD01-11/01), Council considered a draft Local Structure Plan for this area and resolved inter alia, to advertise it for public comment, subject to minor modifications being made to the linear open space design within the application area, a vegetation assessment being undertaken, and the Part 1 provisions of the Structure Plan being modified to address the design requirements of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2).

Council also identified a number of issues requiring additional information/consideration prior to final adoption of the Structure Plan. The issues were:

1. Finalisation and incorporation of an ‘Economic and Employment Initiatives Report’;

2. The applicant demonstrating the provision of mechanisms through which infrastructure will be developed and maintained in an equitable, cost sharing method;

3. An ethnographic and archaeological survey of the site being undertaken;

4. Assessment of the local heritage significance of the Mindarie Pastoral Company homestead;

5. Future changes to the Connolly Drive road reserve.

Detail

A copy of the revised Structure Plan, which was advertised for public comment, and incorporates the changes to the public open space design is shown in Attachment 2. The key features of the plan are as follows:

· Residential and Small Lot Residential Zones, being the predominant land use within the application area, with a projected population of about 3,735 people.

· Transit and Mixed Use Zones, which are intended to accommodate a diverse mixture of land uses near the proposed Clarkson Railway Station, with the predominant uses being residential (with a mix of R40 and R80 codings), office, retail and entertainment.

· Public open space, which makes up some 11.2% of the application area.

A full copy of the revised Structure Plan document has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.

Consultation

The application has been advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days in accordance with the Council resolution. Advertising was carried out by means of three on-site signs, an advertisement placed in the Wanneroo Times newspaper, and abutting landowners being informed by mail. The submission period closed on 6 May 2002. The City received no public submissions.

Comment

The issues that Council required further consideration of prior to final consideration of the structure plan are outlined below, as well as a comment on each.

Economic and Employment Initiatives Report

The applicant engaged consultants SGS Economics and Planning (SGS) to prepare an ‘Employment and Community Development Strategy’ for the Lot 16 area. The suggested economic development strategies show a level of commitment to local employment generation, and the recommended actions within the report are generally supported. A number of employment generating initiatives have been put forward in the Strategy, these being:

1. The provision of access for all residents to broadband telecommunications infrastructure, improving the feasibility of telecommuting / home-based employment and locally based business. The developers have committed themselves to provide broadband access to all new lots within the application area, and this cost has been incorporated into their project feasibility budget.

2. The applicants propose to develop a ‘Distributed Business Incubator’ (DBI), which will provide online business support services for new residents within the application area, who are interested in establishing or expanding a home or locally based business. To facilitate this initiative, the Strategy recommends that the developer provide a one-off grant for the preparation of a business plan for the DBI.

3. The Strategy recommends that a Two Envelope Tendering System be developed for subdivisional and development work within Lot 16. Tenders for civil works would require tenderers to submit their price (first envelope) and their proposals to employ local workers or assist local business formation (second envelope).

4. The Strategy acknowledges the potential development of employment intensive land uses adjacent to the proposed Clarkson Railway Station, and recommends that a high-density commercial development be planned for in this locality (possibly in the form of a strata-titled office block). The Strategy also acknowledges however, that demand for such office space in the northern suburbs is currently relatively low, and commercial developments at centres such as Whitfords, Joondalup and Ocean Keys currently struggle to attract tenants. The Strategy recommends that flexibility be incorporated into the LSP, to enable such development to be facilitated should this demand increase in the future.

To facilitate these employment initiatives, the Strategy proposes that a ‘Community Development Fund’ be set up, through which the developer contributes a portion to the fund, from the proceeds of each lot sold within the development. The Strategy puts forward a nominal figure of $300 per lot, which would ultimately generate around $360,000, assuming a total lot yield of 1200.

Clarification is however needed on who will manage the funds, the uses that the funds can be put, the timing of the release of the funds and how much would be allocated to economic development projects. The strategy places a strong expectation on the developer to ‘seed’ many ventures, but clarification is required as to the ongoing commitment in the long run from the developer as a partner. Short to medium term management responsibility falls to the City and other groups to continue once the ‘seeding’ is complete, and ongoing operational costs often burden resources. Whilst the initiatives put forward in the strategy have significant merit, it still needs to address some of the implementation issues raised above.

One of Administration’s strategic projects identified for the 2002/03 financial year, is the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy for the City. This strategy will address issues such as increasing employment self-sufficiency, attracting industries and providing support for local businesses. It is envisaged that this strategy will provide some guidance to developers on how to address economic and employment initiatives in their developing estates. The SGS report is the first economic and employment initiatives report that the City has received from a developer and has made a serious attempt to address the matter in the absence of any formal guiding policies from the City. On this basis it is considered that the structure plan could be finalised with reference in Part 1 of the structure plan text requiring the finalisation of the economic and employment initiates report prior to the submission of a subdivision application for the land as well as the implementation of the strategies arising from the final report.

Collaborative Planning Model

The City previously undertook a project with the Butler Joint Venture to prepare a collaborative planning model for its estate.

This model was designed to provide a mechanism for the equitable provision and ongoing maintenance of infrastructure in newly developed areas. Council requested a similar model be developed for the Lot 16 development to test some of the model parameters.

The applicant has been involved with discussions with the City in regards to the preparation of a Collaborative Planning Model for its Clarkson landholding. The developer is still working towards identifying if any additional works are to be included within the project and the resulting management implications for the City.

A draft collaborative model has been prepared and presented to Council officers for discussion purposes. It is however considered that the structure plan can be adopted without this model being finalised, as the developer is still finalising the level of infrastructure to be developed within the application area. If additional infrastructure works are ultimately proposed then a requirement for the collaborative planning model can be imposed at the development application stage. This is consistent with the approach taken at Butler.

Aboriginal Heritage

In the preliminary assessment of the Structure Plan, the Department of Aboriginal Affairs provided correspondence advising that the site did not contain any registered sites, however also indicated that the role of the Department is not to give clearances and that further survey work should be undertaken to ensure that no sites exist within the application area. The Aboriginal Heritage Act is administered by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and places an obligation on the owner/developer (rather than the City) to ensure that this issue is addressed. In this case as no significant sites on this land have been registered to date, as the site has been largely cleared of vegetation and as further assessment work rarely identifies any additional significant sites it is considered that any remaining survey work should be undertaken to the satisfaction of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, separate to the structure plan process. The applicant has been made aware of the process requirements for satisfying the provisions of the Aboriginal Heritage Act.

There is one registered Native Title claim over the land, which was registered on 12 May 1999 and was lodged on behalf of the Combined Metropolitan Working Group. However, under the Native Titles Act any rights to claim are extinguished by the grant of a freehold estate (other than to the Crown or to a statutory authority). The application area was converted to freehold and granted to a private company, Mindarie Property Company Limited in July 1978 and as such, there are no valid Native Title issues associated with Lot 16.

Heritage significance of the Mindarie Pastoral Company homestead

The Mindarie Pastoral Company is listed on Council’s current Municipal Inventory as being located on Lot 16. Council required that, prior to adoption of the Structure Plan, further consideration should be given to the significance of the homestead, and possible actions put forward that could maintain its heritage significance, prior to development of the site.

Site visits undertaken by Council officers and the developers have concluded that the Mindarie Pastoral Company homestead no longer exists on Lot 16, although there is anecdotal evidence which suggests that the foundations of the former 1950s home may still exist on-site. In recognition of the former homestead, the applicants propose to implement the following initiatives:

· Naming the main northern entry from Connolly Drive into the application area after the homestead (eg Homestead Drive / Pastoral Drive etc.);

· Naming the nearest park to the former location of the Homestead in recognition of the building (eg Mindarie Homestead Park)

· Installation of a plaque in the park in recognition of the former Homestead;

· The applicants have stated their intention to work with any local historical groups who wish to participate in the naming or wording of the plaque and road.

It is considered that the initiatives put forward by the applicant are acceptable and these requirements should be introduced into Part 1 of the Structure plan document to ensure that they are implemented.

Future changes to the Connolly Drive road reserve

Connolly Drive has a reserve width of 60 metres, and various subdivisional roads within the structure plan area are proposed to encroach into the reserve. Council required that prior to formal adoption of the Structure Plan, more detail be provided outlining the extent of these encroachments. Whilst there is no objection to the principle of local road reserves encroaching into the Connolly Drive road reserve, in discussing this matter further with the City’s Technical Services Directorate, it is considered that these details are more appropriately received at the subdivision stage. The structure plan documents should therefore be amended to ensure that the appropriate detail and justification is provided to the City prior to a subdivision application being received.

Modification of Part 1 Provisions

Prior to the structure plan being advertised, the Part 1 structure plan provisions were to be modified in respect to the design guidelines for the various zones and precincts. Administration is however currently reviewing the matter of design guidelines within structure plans on an overall basis to ensure they are producing quality centres. On this basis, it was seen that the guidelines for this area would most appropriately be deferred until this review was complete. The applicant has agreed to incorporate a requirement that there be no development within the application area until such design guidelines have been incorporated in the structure plan.

Statutory Compliance

The Structure Plan has been assessed in accordance with Clause 9.6 of DPS2.

Strategic Implications

The adoption of this structure plan is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan, and in particular Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Strategic Plan which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning. The economic and employment initiatives incorporated in the structure plan are also consistent with the Economic Development goals of the Strategic Plan which seeks to maximise opportunities for balanced economic growth and development within the City.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. RESOLVES that the modified Structure Plan for Lot 16 Connolly Drive, Clarkson, as submitted by Taylor Burrell on behalf of Urban Pacific and Landstart is SATISFACTORY, subject to clauses being inserted into the Part 1 text to address the following:

a) The finalisation of the economic and employment initiatives report prior to the submission of a subdivision application for the land as well as the implementation of the strategies arising from the final report.

b) A requirement to ensure that the initiatives put forward by the applicant to recognise the heritage significance of the Mindarie Pastoral Company homestead are implemented.

c) Details sufficient to justify any encroachment of subdivisional roads into the Connolly Drive road reserve be provided at the subdivision stage.

d) There being no development of the land until revised design guidelines for the various zones and precincts have been introduced into the structure plan.

2. Upon receipt of the documents modified in accordance with 1 above, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the Local Structure Plan and FORWARDS it to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD02-07/02 Amendment To Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan

File Ref: 71199

File Name: BAAmetoC.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by tpd Date 29 April 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 5

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of an amendment to the Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan.

Applicant	Chappell & Lambert Pty Ltd
Owner	LandCorp
Location	Clarkson District Centre
Site Area	Approximately 41.0 hectares
DPS2 Zoning	Centre
MRS Zoning	Urban

Background

The Joint Commissioners of the former Shire of Wanneroo, at their meeting of 25 August 1998 resolved to adopt the Clarkson District Centre Local Structure Plan (LSP) bounded by Marmion Avenue in the west, Belleville Gardens in the north, Neerabup Road in the south and the proposed Lower Keys Drive in the east (refer Attachment 1). In October 1998, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) adopted the LSP as an Agreed Structure Plan (ASP) (refer Attachment 2).

The first stage of the Centre was subdivided in 1999. This stage generally included the land south of Ocean Keys Boulevard, as well as the area to the north of Ocean Keys Boulevard, which is situated west of Pensacola Terrace. Most of this first stage has now been developed and includes the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre, Bunnings Warehouse and Council Youth Centre, a police station, service station, takeaway food outlets and various commercial units.

A subdivision application for the second stage of the Centre, being that land to the north of Ocean Keys Boulevard, between Pensacola Terrace and Key Largo Drive, has been lodged with the WAPC. The application conforms with the zonings under the existing ASP and was therefore supported by the City. The application is yet to be determined by the WAPC (refer Attachment 3).

Detail

The ASP was prepared under the provisions of the City’s previous Town Planning Scheme No.1 (TPS1) and depicts Commercial Core Precinct, Mixed Business Precinct, Residential Mixed Use Precinct, and Residential Precinct. The general provisions of these precincts were the same as those of Commercial, Mixed Business, Residential Mixed Use and Residential zones respectively of the former TPS1 with some additional provisions.

The ASP also:

1. Specifies a retail floorspace for the Centre of 28800 m² gross leasable area;

2. Applies residential density codes (R-codes) to the entire Centre;

3. Nominates landmark building sites which have special design requirements to draw attention to the particular site;

4. Designates a “mainstreet’ where special development requirements apply to provide nil street setbacks and active building frontages.

The City’s current District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) introduced a number of new zones and terminologies that now conflict with those specified under the ASP. Therefore the applicant seeks to modify the ASP to reflect the zones and terminologies under DPS2. In addition, the application proposes some rationalisation to the extent of the various zoning and residential density codes, the extent of the mainstreet and landmark sites and to confine retail floorspace to the commercial zone. The main changes are described in detail in the comment section of this report.

Consultation

Under clause 9.7 of DPS2, public identification of a proposed amendment to an ASP can be waived if the amendment is considered to be of a minor nature which does not materially alter the intent of the structure plan.

Whilst the proposed changes are considered relatively minor in nature and not considered to materially alter the intent of the structure plan, the first stage of the Centre has been subdivided and the lots on sold. Some of the proposed changes may alter some of the landowners’ development expectations for the area and it would therefore still be prudent to undertake a consultation period. Given the relatively minor nature of the changes, a 28 day period is recommended. Advertising is proposed to be undertaken by way of an onsite advertising sign, an advertisement in the Community News and letters to landowners within the Centre. Details of the amendment will also be available on the City’s website.

Comment

Zoning Changes

The applicant proposes to rename the zones under the ASP from Commercial Core, Mixed Business, Residential Mixed Use and Residential to the corresponding zones under the City’s new DPS2. These zones are Commercial, Business, Mixed Use and Residential. In addition, the applicant proposes to rationalise a number of the zones in the undeveloped portion of the District Centre to better reflect its future development intentions.

The proposed zoning plan is shown on Attachment 4. The proportions of the various zones have not changed significantly and these changes are therefore supported. It should be noted that Council’s current library site on the north eastern corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Key Largo Drive is proposed to be zoned Mixed Use in recognition of the proposal to relocate that site further west along Ocean Keys Boulevard. This does not alter Council’s ownership of this lot in any way and if the relocation plans do not proceed, the library can still be accommodated under the Mixed Use zone. The library can similarly be accommodated in the Commercial Zone which is proposed to cover the alternative site.

Additional Uses

The ASP currently provides that, in addition to the range of permissible uses in the various zones as outlined in the Scheme, a number of additional uses are also permissible. Given that the majority of these additional uses will be able to be accommodated under the new zones, most of these additional uses can be deleted. The only exception is a shop with a floorspace not exceeding 100m² within the Mixed Use zone.

DPS2 does not currently permit a shop within the Mixed Use zone. There was however a specific intention to provide for such a use within the equivalent Residential Mixed Use zone of the current ASP and there is therefore no objection to this use being maintained.

In addition the applicant has requested that the use classes ‘motor vehicle repairs’ and ‘hire service’ be added as discretionary uses in the Business zone. These additions are considered acceptable on the following grounds:

1. The majority of the lots to the north of Ocean Keys Boulevard which front Marmion Avenue are intended to be developed as vehicle sales premises. Motor vehicle repair premises are a reasonable complementary use which cannot otherwise be accommodated in the Clarkson District Centre.

2. Smash repair functions are specifically excluded from the motor vehicle repairs use class and will therefore not be permitted in the Centre.

3. The use hire service was a use that could have been accommodated in this zone until DPS2 was introduced.

4. Most of the Business zone is well buffered from the Residential zones.

5. These uses will be classed as discretionary which would enable an individual assessment of the amenity impacts of each proposal before a decision is made to approve individual premises and then would include the possibility of consultation.

Residential Density Codings

The current ASP codes the entire District Centre R60. The applicant proposes to recode a portion of the Centre adjacent to Belleville Gardens R30 (refer Attachment 5). This provides for a better transition with the low density residential area to the north of Belleville Gardens. This change to the density coding is therefore supported.

Retail Floorspace

The applicant requests that the 28800m² retail floorspace allocated to this Centre be limited to the Commercial zone only and not to the overall Centre. This is however contrary to the provisions of DPS2 which places the limit on the overall Centre in this case.

A change of this nature should be considered in the context of the City’s Centres Strategy, so that any implications arising from the change can be properly considered and a consistent approach taken for all Centres.

Main Street and Landmark Sites

The applicant proposes to rationalise the extent of the mainstreet so that it only applies to the priority area through the commercial core and the relevant lead in portions of adjacent roads. In addition it is proposed to delete the landmark site which was planned for the City’s ‘old’ library site on the north east corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Keys Largo Drive.

The current and proposed extent of the mainstreet and landmark sites is outlined on Attachments 2 and 4. There is no objection to the reduction in the extent of the mainstreet along the lead in roads, with the exceptions that the mainstreet should be extended:

1. around the future road which is proposed to bisect the central commercial block on the northern side Ocean Keys Boulevard (as shown on Attachment 3);

2. along the western boundary of the Mixed Use site on the north east corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Key Largo Drive.

In addition, it is considered the mainstreet should be maintained along the entire length of Ocean Keys Boulevard, as should the landmark site on the north eastern corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Keys Largo Drive. Both of these requirements are included in the current ASP and are considered important to reinforce the character of the mainstreet.

Statutory Compliance

The amendment to the ASP will follow the process required under Part 9 of DPS2.

Strategic Implications

The proposal is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan which seeks to provide a guide to development and co-ordinate the provision of services.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 DETERMINES that the modifications to the Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan proposed by Chappell & Lambert on behalf of LandCorp as indicated on Attachments 4 & 5 to this report should be advertised subject to the following changes first being made:

a) to the structure plan text:

i) reference to the commercial core, mixed business, residential mixed use and residential precincts being replaced with reference to the Commercial, Business, Mixed Use and Residential zones or precincts as relevant;

ii) the inclusion of a statement to require landuses and development standards for each of the zones to be in accordance with the corresponding requirements of District Planning Scheme No. 2 with the exception that a shop with a net lettable area of up to 100m² is an additional discretionary use in the Mixed Use zone and motor vehicle repairs and hire service are additional discretionary uses in the Business zone.

iii) modification to the general terms of the structure plan to make it consistent with District Planning Scheme No. 2.

b) to the structure plan map:

i) a landmark site being added to the mixed use site on the corner of Keys Largo Drive and Ocean Keys Boulevard

ii) the mainstreet being extended along the overall length of Ocean Keys Boulevard (from Pensacola Terrace to Lower Keys Drive), around the intersection of the proposed road within the central commercial block situated north of Ocean Keys Boulevard and along the western boundary of the mixed use site on the corner of Ocean Keys Boulevard and Keys Largo Drive.

2. Once changes referred to in 1 above have been made, ADVERTISES the modifications under the provisions of clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of 28 days.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD03-07/02 Close Of Advertising - Amendment No. 5 To District Planning Scheme No. 2: Pt Lot 9004 Santa Barbara Parade, Quinns Rocks

File Ref: 45005

File Name: BACloofA.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by TPD Date 31 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the results of advertising Amendment No. 5 to District Planning Scheme No. 2.

Applicant	ERM Australia Pty Ltd
Owner	Silverton Pty Ltd
Location	Part Lot 9004, Santa Barbara Parade, Quinns Rocks
Site Area	3.6408 hectares
DPS 2 Zoning	Centre
MRS Zoning	Urban

Background

Council at its meeting on 18 December 2001 (refer item PD03-12/01), resolved to prepare Amendment No. 5 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone Pt Lot 9004 Santa Barbara Parade from the Centre Zone to the Residential Zone. As part of the same item, Council also resolved to advertise a Local Structure Plan (LSP) for the subject area which proposed to subdivide the land into 51 residential lots, a 1509m² area of public open space and a 2567m² drainage site.

A location plan is shown on Attachment 1 and a copy of the Structure Plan is shown on Attachment 2.

The draft LSP was subsequently advertised for a period of 42 days. Council considered the results of this advertising on 18 March 2002 and resolved that the draft LSP was satisfactory and should be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification (refer item PD02-03/02).

Detail

The Environmental Protection Authority advised the City on 29 January 2002 that Amendment No. 5 did not warrant an environmental assessment, thereby allowing the amendment to be advertised.

Consultation

A 42-day public advertising period was carried out between 19 March and 30 April 2002. This consultation involved:

a) An on site sign;

b) Advertisement in ‘The Wanneroo Times’ on 19^th March 2002;

c) Letters to adjoining Landowners.

At the close of advertising no submissions were received.

Comment

As the City did not receive any submissions, it is considered that the amendment should proceed without modification.

Statutory Compliance

The advertising process has complied with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations.

Strategic Implications

The adoption of this structure plan is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan, and in particular, strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Strategic Plan which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated landuse planning.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation (17)2 ADOPTS, without modification, Amendment No. 5 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to:

a) REZONE Part Lot 9004 Santa Barbara Parade, Quinns Rocks from Centre Zone to Residential Zone; and

b) AMEND Schedule 3 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 to delete reference to Quinns Rocks Neighbourhood Centre.

2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (1) (g), AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and ENDORSES the signing of the Amendment documentation.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD04-07/02 Modifications To Draft East Wanneroo Cell 1 Local Structure Plan - Ashby

File Ref: SP/0002V01

File Name: BAModtoE.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 13 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by tpd Date 11 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of a modification to the draft East Wanneroo Cell 1 Local Structure Plan.

Applicant	BSD Consultant
Owner	Satterley Wanneroo Pty Ltd
Location	East Wanneroo Cell 1
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development
MRS Zoning	Urban

Background

On 18 December 2001 Council endorsed the draft East Wanneroo Cell 1 Local Structure Plan (refer Attachment 1 and item PD05-12/01). The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is still considering the draft LSP.

Satterley Wanneroo Pty Ltd own approximately 100 hectares of land in the southern portion of Cell 1. The WAPC has recently granted subdivision approval to stage 1 of this landholding. Construction works for this stage are currently underway.

A subdivision application for stage 2 of the Satterley landholding has also been lodged with the WAPC. The City has requested the application be deferred as the subdivision design did not conform to the LSP endorsed by Council.

The applicant has subsequently requested an amendment to the draft LSP.

Detail

The amendment area includes Stages 1 and 2 of the Satterley landholding, as well as adjacent land that provides a defined precinct. The applicant proposes to modify the road layout, the public open space (POS) and medium density sites (refer Attachment 2). In addition, the applicant has also requested several variations to the R-Code standards in respect of setbacks and the minimum open space requirements for smaller lots (refer Attachment 3).

Consultation

Under clause 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2), public notification of a proposed amendment to a structure plan, can be waived if the amendment is considered to be of a minor nature which does not materially alter the intent of the structure plan.

In this case, the amendments are considered to be of a minor nature. The amendments have been requested by the principal landowner and supported by all other affected landowners. It is therefore recommended that public notification of this amendment be waived.

Comment

The proposed modifications to the road network reflect the approved subdivision for stage 1 and the subdivision application for stage 2 of the applicant’s landholding and integrates well with the remaining portion of the structure plan. The road design is considered acceptable as it provides permeability and easy access to the public open space areas, primary school site and the bus routes.

The existing structure plan depicts two areas of POS within the area subject to amendment. The WAPC, in granting subdivision approval to stage 1, imposed a condition requiring the deletion of the western area of POS. The proposed modification reflects this requirement. The eastern area of POS has only been slightly reconfigured and is considered acceptable.

The principle of providing medium density housing sites on lots adjacent to POS has been maintained, although the actual R-Code boundaries have been adjusted to reflect the new road layout. In view of the deletion of the western area of POS, only one of the medium density sites has been maintained in this area. This site has been maintained in order to provide some opportunity for a mix of housing type in the first stage of subdivision.

The R-code variations sought are principally the same as those that the Council has already agreed to for the Butler Agreed Structure Plan. The variations are discussed briefly below in respect of Cottage lots which are serviced by a laneway and Traditional lots not serviced by a laneway and less than 600m².

Cottage Lots

Front Setback

For ‘Cottage’ lots, which are medium density lots and generally located adjacent to areas of POS, the variation sought is a minimum 1.5 metre and average 3.0 metre front setback. As these variations relate to lots within discrete precincts and served by rear lanes so that carports and garages will not dominate the streetscape, they are supported.

Side Setbacks

The applicant has proposed a minimum 2.0 metre side setback on the northern or eastern most boundary to habitable rooms with major openings facing north, to maximise solar access. This variation is supported.

The R-Codes currently allow a zero lot line in consultation with the adjoining lot owner. The applicant proposed to make this provision mandatory and not subject to the neighbour’s consent. In this regard the applicant has advised that since the prospective purchaser would be advised of this provision, seeking neighbour’s consent again would be unnecessary. This is considered inappropriate, as it would not provide an opportunity for the City to assess the amenity impact of boundary walls on an individual basis. This aspect is therefore not supported.

Minimum Open Space

The R-Codes require a minimum 50% private open space for residential lots, the applicant has requested a minimum of 30% be provided for ‘Cottage’ lots, on the basis that performance criteria relating to the size, orientation, location and use of a courtyard area is provided. This variation is considered acceptable.

Traditional Lots

In regard to traditional lots not serviced by a laneway and less than 600 m², the applicant has proposed a minimum 3 metre front setback with an average of 4.5 metres, as opposed to the 6.0 metre average, 3 metre minimum required under the R-Codes. A minimum 2.0 metre side setback on the northern or easternmost boundary to habitable rooms with major openings facing north, to maximise solar access is also proposed.

As indicated previously, the variations being sought are generally the same as those contained in the Butler Agreed Structure Plan. Whilst it is considered reasonable to support these variations for ‘Cottage’ lots (which are restricted to small precincts), it is not considered appropriate to support such variations for traditional lots. Lot sizes between 450 m² and 600 m² are common place in new subdivisions and consequently it is not considered appropriate to reduce the standards of the Residential Planning Codes for such lots as this would ultimately have the effect of eroding the standards of the R-Codes across the local authority.

Whilst the City has supported such variations in the Butler area (and in other similar estates), those areas have been identified as developments with a specific character and developed by the one owner. In Cell 1 (as with all East Wanneroo Cells), there is a multiplicity of land ownership and with the differing expectations and desires of landowners will similarly lead to different design standards.

In the interest of proper and orderly planning, it is considered appropriate that the same design standards are ultimately maintained in accordance with the Residential Planning Codes for traditional lots.

Statutory Compliance

The structure plan amendment will follow the process outlined in Part 9 of DPS2.

Strategic Implications

The proposal is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal under the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide for quality services and infrastructure.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 DETERMINES that the amendments to East Wanneroo Cell 1 Local Structure Plan, as indicated in Attachment 2 to this report and as set out in the following table, are satisfactory.

R- CODE VARIATION TABLE

Lot type

Front Setback

Side Setback

Open space (Minimum total percentage of site)

Cottage Lots

(Lots serviced by a laneway

1.5 metre minimum

3.0 metre average

Minimum 2.0 metre side boundary setback on the northern most or easternmost boundary to habitable rooms with major openings facing north

30% minimum open space requirement subject to the following criteria:

1.Provision of a courtyard area opening from an internal living area minimum 30 m2 and minimum width 4.0 metre on the northern boundary.

2. The courtyard not to be used for any services eg clothes drying facilities

2. Pursuant to Clause 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No.2 WAIVES the public notification of the amendments to the local structure plan, as it considers them to be of a minor nature which do not materially alter the intent of the structure plan.

3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the amended structure plan and FORWARDS it to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD05-07/02 Adoption Of The Two Rocks Northern Precinct Local Structure Plan

File Ref: 69924

File Name: BAProTwo.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 27 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 24 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 24 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by sb Date 24 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 6

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the adoption of the Two Rocks Northern Precinct Local Structure Plan (LSP).

Applicant	Masterplan Consultants
Owner	Tokyu Corporation
Location	Part Lots 220 and 207 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks
Site Area	240 hectares (approx.)
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development
MRS Zoning	Urban Deferred

Background

In October 2000, the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (then the Ministry for Planning) co-ordinated an ‘Enquiry by Design’ (EBD) workshop to evaluate development options for Tokyu Corporation’s Two Rocks landholding. Because of the uncertainty about the alignment of the future railway and other key district and regional planning issues, the workshop focused on the Two Rocks Marina and surrounding area, including the subject site. Key representatives of the major stakeholders, including the City attended the workshop. The outcomes report on the EBD workshop was subsequently prepared by the DPI and released in March 2002. A copy of the outcomes report has previously been provided to all Elected Members.

The LSP was originally submitted to Council in February 2001 and was prepared in support of a super lot subdivision application. This application related to the entire LSP area and proposed 9 lots each of approximately 20 hectares in area. In the absence of an Agreed LSP, the application was considered to be premature and was therefore deferred by the WAPC pending consideration of the LSP.

The LSP was subsequently withdrawn on 6 June, 2001 with a revised plan being received by the City in October 2001. Council considered this plan at its meeting on 6 November 2001 (PD02-11/01). At this meeting, Council resolved to undertake an advertising period and required the applicant to satisfactorily resolve some 16 outstanding issues, prior to it considering adoption of the LSP.

The LSP was subsequently advertised and on 9 April 2002, where Council considered the submissions resulting from the advertising period and the status of the outstanding issues (PD08-04/02). A number of the outstanding issues were considered to have not been fully addressed at this time and therefore it was resolved to:

1. Endorse the public submissions section of the report;

2. Defer final adoption of the LSP; and

3. Authorise a briefing for the applicant to present details of their progress towards resolving the outstanding issues.

The briefing was subsequently held on 29 April 2002.

Detail

The LSP area represents approximately 240 hectares of land immediately north and east of the existing Two Rocks Townsite (refer Attachment 1).

The land is currently zoned Urban Development under District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2). Part 3.14.1 of DPS 2 states that the purpose of the Urban Development zone is to provide for the orderly planning of larger areas of land in an integrated manner and within a regional context, whilst retaining flexibility to review planning with changing circumstances.

The LSP has been prepared as a guide for the future northern urban expansion of Two Rocks and provides for the creation of approximately 1500 residential lots (approximately 4,500 people). The LSP mainly proposes a low density R20 coding, with pockets of medium density R40. The design is largely based on the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and includes central community focal points based on recreational and community nodes.

The advertised version of the LSP is shown on Attachment 2. A modified version which incorporates many of the changes required by Council is shown on Attachment 3.

Consultation

The LSP was advertised for a period of 42 days, between 30 November 2001 and 11 January 2002. Advertising was undertaken by way of two onsite advertising signs, letters to approximately 350 adjacent landowners, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times Newspaper and a public forum (held at the Phil Renkin Centre on 4 February 2002 and attended by approximately 120 members of the public).

The advertising process resulted in the receipt of 19 submissions. Council endorsed the submissions and the associated Administration comments at its meeting on 9 April 2002. The various submitters have since been advised accordingly. An extract from the 9 April report relating to the submissions is included as Attachment 6.

Comment

The 16 issues that Council required to be resolved prior to the adoption of the LSP are outlined below, together with a comment on each.

a) Further detail and justification for the location and reduction of the Public Open Space (POS) from 10% to 8% consistent with the principles of Liveable Neighbourhoods.

The WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy provides for a reduction in POS provision from 10% to 8% where there is a commitment to the development of the POS. It was not considered appropriate to consent to the reduction in this instance as the necessary commitment and justification for the reduction had not been given. Rather than provide this, the applicant has modified the LSP to reflect the full 10% POS requirement. This is considered acceptable, however the POS schedule originally submitted in the LSP report will still require modification to reflect the current LSP design. This is a straightforward change and therefore adoption of the LSP could be made conditional upon this change being undertaken.

b) Identification and preservation of remnant vegetation within proposed areas of POS and the specification of the exact land areas of the proposed POS areas (including dimensions to ensure active oval requirements can be satisfied).

This requirement has generally been satisfied in the revised LSP, however a number of minor variations should still be required to improve the usability, distribution and preservation of native vegetation within POS areas. These variations are as follows:

· POS areas 7 and 8 being combined to provide a more usable area.

· POS area 10 being increased in size to accommodate a full size, senior active oval.

· POS area 3 being modified to re-position the excess POS around the 4-hectare primary school site with a view to providing joint facilities and the preservation of a greater area of native vegetation, Melaleuca cardiophilla (closed scrub). This will also serve to improve the green link with POS area 4.

· Increasing the size of POS area 5 to retain a greater area of native vegetation, Melaleuca cardiophilla (closed scrub).

· The design around POS area 12 being modified to provide a better foreshore interface, with a clear delineation between residential areas and the Bush Forever site number 397. The western road between POS 12 and the foreshore reserve should be deleted (it should be noted that POS area 12 should be incorporated into the foreshore management plan).

· A reduction in proposed POS area 4.

It should be noted that the above modifications to POS areas 10 and 12 could be accommodated by the reduction in POS area 4, which adjoins the proposed private high school site. The revised plan identifies joint playing field facilities between the private school site and proposed POS 4. This type of arrangement is not normally accepted by the City as it results in restricted access to the facilities for the public.

As these changes are straightforward, adoption of the LSP could be made conditional upon these changes being undertaken.

c) The preparation of a Foreshore Management Plan for the foreshore area between the Two Rocks Marina and the northern boundary of the Local Structure Plan area to comply with ecologically sustainable development principles as recommended by Environmental Australia Standard.

A Foreshore Management Plan (FMP) has been submitted to satisfy this requirement. The plan is currently being assessed by Administration and will require consultation with both the community and relevant government agencies.

Consideration of the Foreshore Management Plan can occur separately to the LSP, however a clause should be included in the text of the LSP to ensure that the plan is finalised to the satisfaction of Council prior to the land being subdivided and to ensure that the recommendations of the FMP are implemented as part of the subdivisional works.

d) The preparation of a ‘Drainage Management Plan’ with water sensitive design, minimised impacts on the function and operation of POS and maintenance implications.

DPS2 requires that a Drainage, Nutrient and Water Management Plan be prepared in accordance with the Minister for the Environment’s ‘Environmental Statement’. The applicant has submitted some details associated with this requirement. These details have been submitted to both the Waters and Rivers Commission (WRC) and Water Corporation (WC) for comment. The WRC generally supported the techniques for drainage disposal identified, providing it incorporates water sensitive urban design criteria. The WC has raised no objection to the proposal.

The submitted details do not however appear to cover the full range of requirements for the preparation of a Drainage, Nutrient and Water Management Plan as outlined in the Minister for the Environment’s ‘Environmental Statement’, which require the applicant to:

· Identify the environmental outcome (including sustainability indicators) to be achieved through the implementation of their plan.

· Include provisions for the connection to deep sewerage.

· Demonstrate that best practice Water Sensitive Urban Design is incorporated to maximise on-site water infiltration generally.

· Provide details of reporting mechanisms to demonstrate compliance with performance criteria specified in the Plan

· Provide details of contingency plans in the event that the performance criteria specified in the plan are not achieved.

It is most important that a full Drainage, Nutrient and Water Management Plan be provided prior to any subdivision or development of the land and therefore it is not essential that it be finalised at this stage. Rather a clause will be included in the text of the LSP to ensure that a satisfactory plan be prepared prior to the subdivision or development of the land and to ensure that the recommendations of the plan are implemented as part of the subdivisional works.

e) The identification and provision of Community facilities within the LSP area.

The revised LSP identifies a 5000 m2 community purposes site in a central location, adjoining a medium density site and at the intersection of two local distributor roads. Consideration of the suitability of this site is further explained in section ‘l’ below.

f) Improved pedestrian links to existing residential areas and further assessment of public transport routes to proposed school sites in consultation with the Department for Planning and Infrastructure.

The applicant has further discussed this issue with Administration and provided further details to clarify and justify the identified routes. It is apparent that the overall road network is capable of accommodating a high a degree of permeability and access to the existing adjacent areas. The proposed public transport routes should however be modified to better service neighbourhood focal points such as the school site and proposed future neighbourhood centre (discussed in section ‘l’ below). Adoption of the LSP should be made conditional upon this change being undertaken. It should also be acknowledged that the proposed public transport routes within the LSP will need to be reviewed when a formal District Structure Plan is submitted for the broader Two Rocks area in the future.

g) The preparation of a traffic management study that adequately considers the volumes of traffic associated with development outside of the LSP area and rationalisation of traffic volumes identified within the North West Corridor Structure Plan.

The applicant has suggested that the report prepared by ERM Mitchell McCotter, originally submitted as part of the LSP report adequately addresses the local and district traffic issues and that regional issues were addressed at the EBD workshop. The City’s Technical Services Directorate has further considered the suitability of the original data provided by the applicant in relation to outcomes of the EBD workshop and the additional information in regard to ultimate traffic volumes generated within the LSP and the impact on exiting road infrastructure.

The applicant’s traffic report indicates that some works (such as traffic calming devices) will be needed to the existing adjacent road network to accommodate the additional traffic from the LSP area. Such works will require detailed consideration and consultation with affected adjacent landowners prior to being undertaken. It is therefore considered appropriate that the LSP text include a requirement for additional details to be provided on the extent and timing of these works prior to subdivision or development of the land and for the works to be undertaken as part of the subdivisional road works at the time recommended in the timing plan.

The traffic concerns, which were previously raised by the City’s Technical Services Directorate in relation Wanneroo Road, are ultimately the responsibility of the Main Roads Western Australia. Main Roads has however written to the City advising that it has no objection to the LSP.

h) The assessment needed to identify areas of potential karst and future management controls are in place to prepare them.

The applicant has now provided a Karstic assessment for the LSP area, which has been prepared by Coffey Geosciences. The assessment concludes that:

“small scale Karstic features have been observed in the limestone present at the project site. However based on the preliminary study carried out, Coffey assess the likelihood of large, open cavities being present in the form of caves in the shallow subsurface as unlikely (and no greater than the likelihood associated with the residential development on the other side of Damepattie Drive)”.

The assessment recommends the following additional work to be carried out in relation to Karst management.

1. At the detailed subdivision design stage a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer shall further examine identified rock exposures, “swampy” swales and broad interdunal depressions in accordance with the principles outlined in Standards Australia (1999) risk management and including:

· Drilling to assess the presence of cavities or thick sands;

· Penotrometre testing at regular intervals to assess for the presence of loose sand horizons should thick sands be encountered;

· Infill percussion drilling in a systematic manner to assess the extent of cavern formation if significant cavernous zones are encountered.

2. Should significant cavities or areas of loose sand be encountered then a suitable strategy shall be developed by a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer to address the issue.

3. As part of the detailed design investigations, confirmation will be required on the suitability of proposed storm water disposal sites on advice from a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer.

The assessment also indicates that significant troglobitic or stygofauna assemblages (subterranean fauna associated with karstic landforms) are unlikely to be present within the LSP area.

The Karstic assessment was referred to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to determine if the level of assessment is sufficient to satisfy the environmental provisions incorporated into DPS2. The DEP has supported the assessment.

The Karstic assessment undertaken is therefore considered satisfactory. The assessment does however recommend further assessment at the subdivision stage and an appropriate clause should therefore be incorporated in the LSP text to ensure that this occurs.

i) Demonstrated measures for controlling off-road vehicle use.

The predominant area requiring control from ‘off road’ vehicle use is the foreshore reserve. The Foreshore Management Plan that has been submitted to the City for consideration addresses this issue. A requirement has been incorporated into the LSP to require the implementation of the recommendations of the Foreshore Management Plan.

j) The deletion of the eastern most school site from the LSP (affected by the rail buffer).

The applicant argues that the EBD workshop addressed the issue of development in proximity to the railway alignment and the suitability of the rail curve.

The DPI however has previously informed the City that this portion of the LSP should be deleted to provide flexibility for the future planning for the land in proximity to the proposed railway line. The DPI position is considered to be sound. Although the applicant has suggested that the development of this area would not compromise the future planning based on the EBD workshop held in March 2002, it should be noted that the EBD workshop has not been adopted by the City, the WAPC or other government agencies. On this basis, the applicant should be advised to delete reference to the easternmost school site land from the LSP area.

k) The preparation and incorporation of an economic and employment initiatives report to address the provision of employment throughout the structure plan area.

On the district level, a Strategic Cooperation Agreement (SCA) between the WAPC, the City, Tokyu Corporation and Yanchep Sun City has been entered into which defines a series of principles and objectives for both the urban and economic development of the applicant’s landholding. The SCA included a commitment from Tokyu Corporation and Yanchep Sun City for the preparation and implementation of the IDEA Project (an acronym for – Innovation, Development, Employment, Applications). The main aims of the IDEA project are to create employment opportunities ahead of residential expansion to allow the area to be as self sufficient as possible in respect to employment of its workforce. Tokyu Corporation are currently investigating several avenues for establishing various industries in the area. These investigations are not elaborated on here for commercial sensitivity reasons, however were discussed in the applicant’s briefing to Elected Members on 29 April,2002.

Whilst the IDEA project is an important initiative that aims to increase the likelihood of greater employment self sufficiency in the Yanchep Two Rocks district, the LSP area in itself, is largely residential and provides little opportunity for employment. As such Council required the preparation of an initiatives report to address this issue. Such a report has not been presented to date.

Council will recall that it has imposed a requirement for such a report on several developers over the last few months. The first report received relates to the LSP for Lot 16 Connolly Drive, Clarkson and was prepared by consultants SGS Economics and Planning (SGS) (see related report on this agenda). The SGS report suggests a number of employment generating initiatives including:

1. The provision of broadband telecommunications infrastructure across the development area to improve the feasibility of telecommuting/home-based employment and locally based business.

2. The development of a business incubator which will provide online business support services for new residents within the area who are interested in establishing or expanding a home or locally based business.

3. The development of a two envelope tendering system for subdivisional and development work within the area, whereby a second tender price is submitted which uses local employment.

4. Incorporating flexibility into the LSP area to enable business development to be facilitated.

5. The establishment of a Community Development Fund.

Initiatives along these lines may similarly be appropriate for the Two Rocks LSP area and have been discussed with the applicant. The applicant has indicated a willingness to investigate initiatives such as these, and in particular, the establishment of a Community Development fund which may be used to offset any successful projects emanating from the IDEA project. The details of this will require further consideration. It is therefore suggested that the applicant be required to appropriately address this matter.

One of Administration’s strategic projects identified for the 2002/03 financial year, is the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy for the City. This strategy will address issues such as increasing employment self-sufficiency, attracting industries and providing support for local businesses. The strategies will provide some guidance to developers on how to address economic and employment initiatives in their developing estates. As the requirement for an economic and employment report for new structure plans is a relatively new requirement of Council, little guidance could be given by the City in the case of Two Rocks. As the applicant has committed to employment initiatives at the district level through the SCA and IDEA project and is willing to investigate further initiatives as outlined above, it is considered reasonable that consideration of the structure refer to this matter.

l) The applicant demonstrating that the allocation of land uses has been addressed as part of a district framework and that the City’s support for the LSP will not compromise the effective planning and implementation of district infrastructure/facilities and services.

The applicant has provided additional detail and justification relating to the district planning framework for the LSP.

The North West Corridor Structure Plan for Yanchep (NWCSP) was released by the then Department of Planning and Urban Development (now DPI) in 1993. The NWCSP was based on a more detailed structure plan prepared by Feilman Planning Consultants. Copies of these plans are shown on Attachments 4 and 5.

The Metropolitan Region Scheme and the City’s District Planning Scheme have subsequently introduced zones and reserves over the LSP land, generally in accordance with the NWCSP. In broad terms the LSP area is set aside as residential under the NWCSP and dissected by a regional road (Sunset Drive). Apart from a minor variation to the alignment of the Sunset Drive and the provision of a neighbourhood centre, the LSP is generally in accordance with the NWCSP. There is no objection in principle to the minor realignment of Sunset Drive, although an amendment will be required to the MRS. This could be included in an omnibus amendment that the WAPC is planning to initiate in the near future. The neighbourhood centre should however be provided for in the LSP, with a retail allocation in accordance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Centres Policy. The proposed community purposes site should also be grouped with this centre. These are straightforward changes and therefore the adoption of the LSP could be made conditional upon them being undertaken.

m) Commitments toward the ultimate development and nature of the Two Rocks Town Centre and surrounding areas.

The applicant has again reiterated that the Two Rocks Town Centre area is not in the ownership of Tokyu Corporation and it cannot therefore commit towards its ultimate development. Tokyu Corporation should be advised that as the substantial landholder within the Yanchep/Two Rocks area and as the previous landowner of much of the Town Centre land, Council considers that it still has an obligation to promote and contribute toward the planning of the Town Centre area. A commitment towards the future consideration of detailed planning in a cohesive manner, in particular for the University Boulevard area, which is owned by Tokyu Corporation and the adjoining Town Centre area should be pursued with the Tokyu Corporation.

n) Provision of an appropriate mechanism to ensure that future contributions by the owners toward infrastructure are adequately addressed.

The existing Deed of Infrastructure between Tokyu Corporation and the WAPC assigns specified portions of Regional Roads to individual super lots. The further fragmentation of these super lots through the proposed subdivision application would necessitate a variation to this agreement to pass the obligations onto the new lots and also to extend the range of infrastructure covered. This would possibly include POS, drainage facilities, traffic calming on adjacent existing streets, foreshore management works, schools etc.

The applicant has suggested that an amendment of the existing Deed of Infrastructure will be adequate to address infrastructure provision and that the process of drafting modifications are underway. The assignment of infrastructure could adequately be covered by a deed, however the City should be one of the party’s to the deed, as many of the works relate to infrastructure under its control. The modifications to the deed of Infrastructure are most appropriately required at the subdivision stage. A provision should be included in the LSP to ensure that this occurs.

o) Provision within Part 1 of the local structure plan to restrict development or subdivision occurring within the subject land until such time as the land has been assessed and cleared for unexploded ordinance.

A requirement to search and clear unexploded ordinance from developing coastal areas within the City is a standard condition imposed upon subdivision approvals by the WAPC. Given the significance of the issue, it is desirable to include a statutory provision to ensure that the search and clearance is undertaken.

p) Clarification from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs as to whether further assessment and preparation of a management plan is required, in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Scheme.

The environmental provisions of DPS2 require the preparation of a management plan in respect to Aboriginal Culture and Heritage. The DEP has acknowledged that no significant aboriginal sites were identified within the LSP area during the environmental assessment, however recommends that formal comment be obtained from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs on this matter.

The Department of Aboriginal Affairs has indicated that further consultation with Aboriginal Groups should be undertaken. It is therefore recommended that a provision be incorporated in to the LSP text to ensure that this occurs prior to the subdivision or development of the area.

Telecommunication Facility

The LSP indicates the location of an existing telecommunication facility, directly adjacent to the proposed northern primary school and within a proposed residential area. This is contrary to the City’s policy on Mobile Telephone Base Stations. A provision should therefore be included in the structure plan text for this facility to be removed prior to subdivision (other than superlot subdivision) of the land within 500 metres of the facility.

It would be more appropriate to assess the overall requirements for telecommunication facilities as an overall strategy for the broader Two Rocks area, rather than allocating an adhoc facility within this largely residential LSP area.

Summary

The applicant has now satisfied many the outstanding requirements associated with this LSP. Those matters that are yet to be satisfactorily addressed can be undertaken either as a condition of adoption or alternatively addressed by including provision within the LSP for the requirement to be fulfilled at a future stage (primarily prior to subdivision or development of the land).

On this basis, it is considered that the Council is now in a position to favourably consider the adoption of the LSP.

Statutory Compliance

The structure plan has followed the process as outlined in Part 9 of DPS 2.

Strategic Implications

The economic and employment initiatives required to be incorporated in the structure plan are also consistent with the economic development goals of the Strategic Plan which seeks to maximise opportunities for balanced economic growth and development within the City.

Formal environmental assessment of this area has been undertaken and the various requirements incorporated in either DPS2 and/or this LSP which is consistent with the environmental sustainability goal of the City’s Strategic Plan which seeks to conserve and enhance our environmental assets.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planing Scheme No. 2, RESOLVES that, subject to the following modifications being undertaken, the Two Rocks Northern Precinct Local Structure Plan as submitted by Masterplan Consultants on behalf of Tokyu Corporation is SATISFACTORY:

a) A revised plan being submitted showing the following modifications:

i. Changes to the distribution of public open space to better preserve existing vegetation and improve active recreation facilities as described in this report together with the provision of an updated public open space schedule that accurately reflects the revisions.

ii. The identification of a neighbourhood centre within the application area, generally in accordance with the ‘urban village’ location identified within the North West Corridor Structure Plan with a retail floor space allocation consistent with the rates outlined in the Metropolitan Centres Policy for a neighbourhood centre.

iii. The proposed community purpose site being incorporated within the urban village referred to in point ii) above.

iv. A revised public transport route to better serve the urban village.

v. The deletion of the eastern primary school site land from the structure plan area.

b) The incorporation of the following additional provisions into the structure plan text:

i. A requirement for the Foreshore Management Plan to be adopted prior to the City supporting any subdivision or development of the structure plan land and the recommendations of the adopted Foreshore Management Plan being implemented as part of subdivision works for the land.

ii. Additional Karstic assessment being undertaken as part of subdivisional works in accordance with the recommendations of the Coffey Geosciences recommendations.

iii. The 5000 square metre community purposes site being transferred to the City of Wanneroo free of cost, in lieu of public open space, upon the first stage of development or subdivision of the proposed neighbourhood centre.

iv. A requirement to provide additional details on the extent and required timing of road works, such as traffic calming devices, on the existing roads adjacent to the structure plan area and the works to be undertaken as part of the subdivisional works in accordance with an agreed timing.

v. A requirement to ensure equitable contributions toward infrastructure to serve the structure plan land in the event that it is subdivided into super lots. This infrastructure would include, but not be limited to regional roads, public open space, drainage facilities, traffic calming works on existing adjacent roads, foreshore management works and schools etc.

vi. The preparation and adoption of a satisfactory Drainage, Nutrient and Water Management Plan in accordance with Minister for the Environments ‘Environmental Statement’ prior to the City supporting any development or subdivision of the structure plan land.

vii. The applicant satisfying the requirements of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in relation to Aboriginal Heritage matters prior to the City supporting any subdivision or development of the structure plan land.

viii. A requirement for the structure plan area to be searched for unexploded ordinance to the and satisfaction of the Western Australian Planning Commission and the Unexploded Ordnance Branch of the WA Police Force prior to any subdivision or development being undertaken.

ix. A requirement to ensure the removal of the existing telecommunication facility adjacent to the northern most primary school is removed prior to the subdivision (other than superlot subdivision) of the land within 500 metres of the facility together with a notation to this effect on the plan.

3. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission that in order for the applicant to implement the Two Rocks Northern Precinct Local Structure Plan, an amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme, ‘Regional Road Reservation’ for Sunset Boulevard will be required and requests that it consider including this in the omnibus amendment that it is about to initiate;

4. ADVISES Tokyu Corporation that as a major landowner in the area and the previous owner of much of the Town Centre land, Council considers that Tokyu Corporation still has an obligation to promote and contribute toward the planning of the Two Rocks Town Centre area.

5. ADVISES Tokyu Corporation that it will require an appropriate arrangement to be put in place for the establishment of a Community Development (type) Fund to promote economic and community development initiatives within the area, and could be introduced as a major initiative of the IDEA Project.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Issues Arising from Advertising ATTACHMENT 6, P 1

The points of concern raised in the submissions and at the public forum, the frequency the issue was raised and a comment on each point is outlined in the following table:

Point of Objection

Frequency Raised

Comment

1. The LSP should better identify, reflect and preserve the natural vegetation on the site.

The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed areas of POS generally accord with the better quality areas of remnant vegetation within the LSP. However it should be noted that further opportunity through the rationalisation of several of the small pocket parks and the introduction of the full 10% POS would provide a better opportunity for the preservation of vegetation within larger areas of POS. It has also been suggested that the exact detail of the proposed areas of POS can only be provided at the detailed design stage.

2. Proposed lot sizes are too small and would detrimentally affect the character of the Two Rocks fishing village.

The majority of proposed lots sizes are considered to be consistent with the minimum lot sizes promoted under the Residential R20 coding. The R20 coding is consistent with the existing coding over the Two Rocks Village. Although several small pockets of medium density (R40) housing have been promoted within the LSP, these areas can form the basis for community nodes/focus and have been identified away from existing residential areas. The provision of medium density sites (where smaller lots sizes can be accommodated) is considered to be consistent with the provisions of the ‘community codes’ and established planning policy where a range in lots sizes is promoted

3. Super lotting of the subject land provides a ‘quick buck’ for the developers but does not provide any essential infrastructure or gain to the existing or new community (i.e. schools still will not be available for many years).

The City is currently assessing the suitability of the LSP in regard to the absence of local community facilities, shopping facilities etc. and will ultimately require modifications if the applicant cannot demonstrate that these facilities will be provided outside of the application area and within proximity to residential catchments. Ultimately the provision of these types of facilities will be provided in conjunction with the development of the land for residential use.

4. Objection to Charnwood Place becoming a through road

Charnwood Place is outside of the application area and although the indicative design over this parcel of land reflects a through road, consideration to the suitability to this connection will be given through subsequent structure planning processes and public consultation relating directly to this area.

ATTACHMENT 6, P 2

5. Karst formations located within the application area.

This was one of the issues that the Council required the applicant to resolve prior to the final adoption of the LSP. Refer to point (h) of this report for further details.

6. Impacts on groundwater drinking supply and sewer/servicing

The site is within the Perth Coastal Underground Water Pollution Control Area (UWPCA), which is identified as a Priority 3 Public Drinking Water Supply area. These areas are defined to minimise the risk of pollution to the water source and are declared over land where water supply sources need to co-exist with other land uses such as residential, commercial, and light industrial developments. Generally the requirements to protect groundwater within Priority 3 areas are through the provision of appropriate wastewater treatment by the implementation of Deep Sewer to remove liquid wastes away from the Priority 3 catchment areas.

The Water Corporation (WC) is responsible for assessment and implementation of strategies for the removal of liquid wastes. The WC is satisfied that the wastewater strategy proposed for the Two Rocks area is suitable, subject to the resolution of funding and subdivision staging. It is anticipated that the Two Rocks area will ultimately connect to the proposed treatment plant at Alkimos via a main sewer system linked to local pumping stations and gravity sewers. This requirement will ultimately be resolved through consultation with the relevant servicing authority.

The provision of drinking water within the application area shall be determined in consultation with the WC. The WC has indicated that the report prepared by Masterplan generally covers the capability of the Water Corporation’s existing water supply system for the Two Rocks area and the requirements for further upgrade to the existing system to supply the overall northern precinct.

ATTACHMENT 6, P 3

7. Appropriate beach access should be provided

Beach access will be considered as part of the Foreshore Management Plan for the Two Rocks area. A Foreshore Management Plan was recently submitted to the City for consideration. Ultimately this foreshore plan will require formal public consultation and be the subject of a separate Council consideration.

8. Increased traffic

The projected traffic volumes are considered to be within reasonable limits of local distributor roads. The LSP design has been prepared with consideration for minimising the impacts on existing residents where possible.

9. Lack of local employment within the LSP

The applicant has adopted a philosophy within the LSP to remove local community and retail facilities and promote them in the Two Rocks Town Centre area. The issue of economic and employment initiative was a Council requirement which was to be resolved by the applicant prior to the final adoption of the LSP. Further consideration of this issue is made in points (k) and (l) of this report.

10. Boat launching facilities should be upgraded

It is considered unreasonable to impose an obligation on the landowner to implement additional or upgrade works on the Two Rocks boat launching facilities in the content of this application.

11. The important ridge should be preserved

The LSP identifies the preservation of the large ridge. This ridge contains vegetation identified in the vegetation survey plan prepared by ATA Environmental as ‘poor’ quality. The ridge was originally considered and incorporated into the Enquiry By Design workshop for preservation.

12. Telecommunication towers should be identified in the LSP

The City’s Policy on Mobile Telephone Base Stations recommends the identification of base stations at an early stage of the structure planning process. However, given the extent of the Tokyu landholding it is preferable that regional consideration to the provision of Telecommunication Towers be made in consultation with the applicant. Consideration for these types of facilities may be provided within this LSP area as part of an overall strategy.

ATTACHMENT 6, P 4

13. Unexploded Ordinance

This was one of the issues that Council required the applicant to resolve prior to the final adoption of the LSP. The applicant has since agreed that a provision should be included in Part 1 of the LSP to require that no subdivision or development should proceed until the land has been searched and cleared for unexploded ordinance. In any case, this is a standard subdivision requirement for land in this area.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD06-07/02 Rezoning Of Lots 500 And 501 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo: Proposed Amendment No. 15 To District Planning Scheme No. 2

File Ref: 73443

File Name: BASPERES.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 5 Approval by sb Date 27 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 7

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider an application to amend City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) to rezone Lots 500 and 501 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo from General Rural to Special Residential.

Applicant	J.J., B.M., P.D and M.J. Havel
Owner	J.J. & B.M. Havel (Lot 500); P.D. & M.H. Havel (Lot 501)
Location	Lots 500 and 501 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
Site Area	3.0917 ha
DPS 2 Zoning	General Rural
MRS	Rural

Background

The location of the subject land is shown on Attachment 1. It is situated between Yellagonga Regional Park to its west and East Wanneroo Urban Cell No. 1 to its east (on the other side of Wanneroo Road).

The land is currently used for residential purposes with three homes existing on the 2 lots concerned. Portion of Lot 500 has been planted with fruit and nut trees however this use is not undertaken for commercial purposes.

Much of the subject land had been cleared for farming prior to acquisition of the land by the current owners in 1957. The land now has reasonably good tree cover due to regrowth which has occurred and tree planting which has been undertaken.

The owners applied for Special Residential zoning under former Town Planning Scheme No. 1 (TPS1) several years ago, however the application was never formally considered and was discontinued due to the imminent replacement (at that time) of TPS1 by DPS2.

Detail

The application seeks Special Residential zoning of the subject land to facilitate future subdivision of each of the present lots into 3 lots (resulting in a total of 6 lots). This is mainly to enable the owner’s children and their families to also be able to live on a property in this location.

The proposed Development Guide Plan is shown on Attachment 2. Although lot sizes are not shown, the applicants state that the proposed lots will range from 4000m² to 5800m² with an average of 5150m². The lot configuration on lot 500 accommodates a 1600m² area of land (lot 3) which was acquired several years ago from the owner by Main Roads WA for future drainage purposes.

The Special Provisions proposed by the applicant to be applied to the subject land under DPS2 are included in Attachment 3.

The applicant’s submission includes a summary of the ‘grounds of rezoning’ which they consider justify the rezoning and this is included in Attachment 4.

A full copy of the rezoning submission has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room.

Consultation

The application has been assessed by Administration and has been referred for comment to key government agencies. The Yellagonga Regional Park Community Advisory Committee has also been briefed on the proposal. Should the application successfully reach the public advertising stage, opportunity for public comment will occur at that time.

Comment

1. Planning Context

The current regional strategic plan applying to the North West Corridor (‘North West Corridor Structure Plan’: 1992) designates the various pockets of rural land (including the precinct at the northern end of Lake Joondalup which includes lots 500 and 501) situated between Wanneroo Road and Yellagonga Regional Park as ‘Subject to City of Wanneroo Local Structure Planning’. Consequently, although the subject land is presently zoned General Rural, it has been excluded from consideration under the Draft Local Rural Strategy as it has long been intended to be dealt with through separate planning studies.

A draft strategy for these pockets of land was prepared in the early 1990’s which proposed that this northern precinct be used for Special Residential purposes. This strategy was not finalised, however it did provide the basis for Administration in subsequent years to advise the owners of lots 500 and 501 that a rezoning proposal for Special Residential for their land should have reasonable prospects for success, provided it was consistent with a broader strategy prepared for all of that northern precinct.

The owners did indeed advise of their intentions to seek Special Residential zoning of their land, however were advised that they should wait until a strategy for the northern precinct had been prepared by the City. The preparation of the strategy has been continually deferred due to other priorities and still remains an outstanding project to be undertaken when resources are available.

To avoid having to continue to defer the Havel’s proposal, they were advised that it may be possible to consider their proposal ahead of the preparation of a strategy for the total northern precinct on the basis that their land, together with Pt. lots 1 and 2 to the south of their land, forms a reasonably discrete area of land in its own right, being separated from the rural land to the north by a distinct low-lying area (marked as ‘depression’ on Attachment 1) situated immediately north of lot 500. Although this depression is currently used for grazing of stock, it appears to be part of the Lake Joondalup wetland formation and was actually proposed for reservation for Parks and Recreation by the WA Planning Commission several years ago, although this proposal was not finalised by the Commission.

In a previous draft rezoning proposal, the applicants had included an indicative ‘Local Area Structure Plan’ for this ‘sub-precinct’ involving the land south from the depression, to the pine plantation to the south (refer Attachment 5).

Although this plan has no real status, it does demonstrate how the subdivision of lots 500 and 501 into 6 lots (albeit in a somewhat different pattern to that shown on this early draft plan) would not prejudice the future development of Pt. Lots 1 and 2 to the south, should those owners also wish to eventually develop their land for Special Residential purposes.

2. Comments by Government Agencies

The following is a summary of comments on the proposal received from Government agencies, together with City Administration response to those comments.

Main Roads WA (MRWA)

MRWA advises that the proposal is acceptable to MRWA, subject to the following conditions being imposed:

a) Vehicle access to Wanneroo Road is limited to 2 driveways as per the proposed Development Guide Plan.

Response: A Special Provision is proposed to impose this requirement.

b) No earthworks to encroach onto the Wanneroo Road reserve.

Response: MRWA can ensure this occurs at subdivision application stage.

c) No drainage to be discharged onto the Wanneroo Road reserve.

Response: Proposed Special Provision (3) addresses this.

Water Corporation

The Corporation advises that:

a) Subdivision of lots less than 2 ha requires provision of reticulated water supply by the developer. (The nearest reticulated water supply to serve the lots is currently located at the intersection of Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive, a distance of approximately 700m.)

b) The developer is expected to provide all sewer reticulation and to contribute for headworks.

Response to a) and b) dealt with later in this report.

Fire and Emergency Services Authority of WA (FESA)

FESA Fire Services has no objection to the proposal however it would require that fire hydrants be installed at 400m centres.

Response: The applicant’s submission advises that the owners will install necessary fire hydrants when reticulated water services are available to the site. It is recommended that a Special Provision be included to ensure implementation of this.

Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM)

CALM advises that the proposal has addressed comments made by CALM on an earlier proposal forwarded to it.

Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)

DEP advises that:

a) As the subject land is within a proposed Priority 3 Underground Water Pollution Control Area, lots less than 1ha in size are considered an incompatible land use (in respect to protection of public water supply) if they are not connected to deep sewerage. Deep sewer connection is also considered necessary in respect to protection of water quality in Lake Joondalup. DEP is concerned that this proposal may set a precedent for further similar proposals (which are not connected to deep sewer) in this area.

Response: This issue is dealt with later in this report.

b) Future development should be planned to mitigate ‘edge effects’ in respect to nearby regionally significant vegetation in Yellagonga Regional Park (eg. weed invasion, spread of dieback and littering).

Response: The submission is considered to adequately address these issues, and in fact advises that the abutting public land which was resumed many years ago may already present these sort of management problems.

c) With respect to Lake Joondalup, a dryland buffer of 50m or 1 metre AHD higher than the furthest extent of the wetland vegetation, whichever is the largest, should be established as a buffer to the wetland.

Response: The proposal would involve a dryland buffer of approximately 100m from the wetland vegetation located in Yellagonga Regional Park. In respect to height of the building envelopes above the height of the wetland vegetation, all envelopes are generally well above the 1m AHD separation recommended by DEP, except the north-western most building envelope on lot 500 which may be close to this separation.

Wetland mapping undertaken by the Environmental Protection Authority and former Water Authority of WA in 1993 gives some cause for confidence in this matter as this shows the recommended 50m boundary of the ‘zone of critical influence’ as falling to the west of the western boundary of the subject land, and therefore further west again from the actual building envelopes (refer Attachment 6).

It is worth noting in respect to buffer provision for this proposal that Lot 15 which is immediately to the west of lots 500 and 501 (refer Attachment 1) and is now within Yellagonga Regional Park, previously formed part of the owner’s property and was reserved and acquired for addition to the Lake Joondalup Parks and Recreation reserve area.

d) Measures should be put in place (eg. records on titles) to ensure that prospective purchasers are advised of the existence of a health risk due to mosquitoes, as well as the potential for midge to impact on the amenity on residents.

Response: Proposed Special Provision (7) addresses the midge issue.

Water and Rivers Commission (WRC)

The WRC advises that it has no objection to the proposal however it offers the following advice:

a) In Priority 3 groundwater protection areas, lots below 1ha in size should be connected to deep sewerage.

Response: Addressed later in this report.

b) WRC will not support any residential development within a 50m buffer of wetland dependent vegetation.

Response: Addressed in c) of DEP comments above.

c) Recommended that on-site effluent disposal should have a horizontal separation of 100m from Lake Joondalup.

Response: The building envelopes are at least 150m from the water body of Lake Joondalup, and at least 100m from the fringing vegetation belt associated with the main lake water body.

d) There should be no direct discharge of stormwater or wastewater into Lake Joondalup.

Response: The proposed Special Provisions address this matter.

e) Private bores will be required to be licensed.

Response: The rezoning submission acknowledges this and advises that it is intended to divide a current licensed allocation into smaller licenses.

3. Other Comments

Waste Water Disposal

As noted in 2. above, DEP and WRC have advised that the proposed lots should be connected to sewer, and the Water Corporation has advised that the landowners will be responsible for providing such sewer connection.

Clause 3.19.3 (b) of DPS2 (general provisions relating to Special Residential zones) provides that: “A reticulated deep sewerage system will be required if, in the opinion of the relevant authorities, the land is considered not suitable for the long term, efficient on-site disposal of effluent”. It may be noted that this clause refers to the ‘long term’ on-site disposal of effluent, and in this regard, it is considered that DEP and WRC have not appreciated that the landowners do not propose such long term on-site disposal. Rather, they propose only short term disposal, and that once the sewer main is constructed past the subject land, the Special Provisions will require the landowners to connect to the sewer within two years. The applicants have advised in their submission that in their discussions with the Water Corporation, it has been indicated that the sewer main is likely to extend south of Clarkson Avenue within the next 5 years. Given this timing, and the fact that the proposal involves the addition of only 3 additional houses in this area, and the on-site systems shall be required to be of the biocycle type, it is considered unreasonable to refuse the proposal on this basis. This is particularly so when this proposal is compared (as the applicants do) to other recent residential subdivision developments adjacent to Lake Joondalup where the nutrients associated with fertilising of gardens would be far greater than that which would be caused by the addition of 3 houses (on biocycle systems) in this area.

Water Supply

As noted in 2. above, the Water Corporation has advised that this proposal should require provision of reticulated water supply by the developer.

Clause 3.19.3 (c) of DPS2 (general provisions regarding Special Residential zones) provides that: “A reticulated water supply from the Water Corporation network shall be provided to each lot”.

Similarly to the sewerage issue dealt with above, the applicants propose a Special Provision which will require landowners to connect to the water main within 2 years of it being constructed past the subject land. This approach is considered reasonable, and it should be noted that Clause 3.19.4 of DPS2 provides that Special Provisions override General Provisions in the case of any conflict.

Development Guide Plan (DGP)

The DGP, while on the face of it does propose some reasonably unusually shaped lots, does respond well to the site conditions and planning constraints. However, a number of minor modifications are recommended:

a) proposed lot sizes and dimensions should be shown;

b) future lot boundaries in the vicinity of the access points from Wanneroo Road need to be re-drawn to correctly show that each lot will have some lot frontage to Wanneroo Road at these points. Fencing and gate locations, and areas subject to reciprocal access rights should also be shown to ensure that these access points function satisfactorily in traffic engineering terms;

c) it should be labelled ‘Development Guide Plan’;

d) building envelopes for all proposed lots should be shown (it presently only shows envelopes for lots which currently do not have buildings on), including dimensions of each envelope and distances of each envelope from adjacent lot boundaries.

Nearby Poultry Farm

A poultry farm exists on lot 20 Wanneroo Road (refer Attachment 1). The distance between the nearest point of Lot 500 to the nearest poultry shed is approximately 200m.

WA Planning Commission Statement of Planning Policy No. 5 on poultry farms (which local governments are required to have regard to in considering rezoning proposals near to poultry farms) provides that where residential development is proposed within 500m of a poultry farm, or rural-residential development is proposed within 300m of a poultry farm, the local government may require that the applicant undertake an assessment to show that the poultry farm will not adversely affect the amenity of the future residents of the proposed development.

In this case, despite the fact that only 3 new dwellings would be involved, and although the proposal includes provision for notices to be put on the titles of the new lots to ensure that new residents are aware of possible impacts associated with the poultry farm, it is still considered appropriate to require such an assessment.

This will ensure that the City remains consistent in respect to how it has addressed this issue in the past, and has regard for advice previously provided by the City’s legal advisors, which advise that the City must take due care on this issue. Such an assessment would be expected to take account of the fact that owners of properties surrounding this poultry farm are in the process of considering possibilities for facilitating the relocation of this farm to enable residential development of this portion of East Wanneroo Cell 1 to proceed.

Water Table Height

The rezoning submission includes a plan showing the existing contours of the land, and estimated maximum water table levels based on Water and Rivers Commission’s groundwater atlas (refer Attachment 7).

It may be noted from this plan that if the water table ever actually reached the water table levels shown on this plan, the north west corner of lot 500 would be under a metre or so of water. The applicants advise that this portion of the land is indeed sometimes subject to inundation and becomes ‘swampy’, however it would not be flooded to the extent indicated by the water table levels shown on Attachment 7. This is not considered to present an accurate depiction of water table characteristics for this area, but rather the broad pattern of levels presented by the WRC atlas. For example, the maximum water level recorded for Lake Joondalup (in 1970) was approximately 18m, significantly less than the 20m water table contour shown passing through the centre of these lots.

A more accurate knowledge of the estimated water table levels for this area would be appropriate, particularly for assisting in the setting of appropriate building levels and determining design requirements for on-site effluent disposal systems. It is therefore recommended that a Special Provision be included, requiring that prior to a subdivision application being made, the landowner must submit to the City’s satisfaction, a report by a suitably qualified person to provide detailed information on this matter.

Proposed Special Provisions

The proposed Special Provisions shown in Attachment No. 3 are considered to be generally satisfactory, however additional Special Provisions are recommended to deal with the following:

a) Fire hydrant provision (see FESA’s comments above);

b) Giving effect to the building envelopes shown on the Development Guide Plan

c) Provision of detailed information regarding estimated maximum water table heights (see previous section headed ‘water table height’);

d) Construction of fire breaks on all lots prior to creation of the new lots (this entailing a modification of the applicant’s proposed Special Provision (f) – last ‘dot’ point);

e) Ensuring (through records on title) that landowners are aware that when Wanneroo Road is dualled, southward access onto Wanneroo Road will be restricted.

Proposed Special Provision (f) will also need modifying to ensure it is clear that when sewer and water services are constructed along Wanneroo Road past the subject land, all of the 6 lots shall require connection within 2 years to these mains (and not just the lots which presently do not have dwellings on, which the Special Provision could currently be interpreted as meaning).

4. Conclusion

The objectives of the Special Residential zone under DPS2 are intended to:

“ (a) accommodate a spacious style of living in a low density setting;

(b) maintain important environmental and landscape values through site-sensitive design and development”.

The proposal submitted is considered to meet the above objectives and is recommended for support.

Statutory Compliance

Where a proposed Scheme amendment is considered to be generally consistent with existing statutes or policy, the local government may proceed to advertise the amendment for public comment, otherwise the Western Australian Planning Commission’s approval is required to advertise for public submissions. The Act also requires all Scheme amendments to be submitted to the Environmental Protection Authority for consideration of any Environmental Review requirements.

Strategic Implications

This proposal is considered to be consistent with the healthy communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan in terms of providing for greater lifestyle choice, and ensuring that environmental values are identified and protected.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. In pursuance of section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928 (as amended), PREPARES Amendment No. 15 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:

a) rezone lots 500 and 501 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo from General Rural to Special Residential Zone No. 6;

b) include the following in Schedule 14 of the Scheme text:

Special Residential Zone No. 6

Description of Locality: Lots 500 and 501 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo

Special Provisions:

1) A maximum of 6 lots with a minimum lot size of 4000sq m shall be provided. Subdivision shall generally be in accordance with the Development Guide Plan.

2) Access from individual lots to Wanneroo Road shall be via the designated access points off Wanneroo Road as shown on the Development Guide Plan.

3) All stormwater run-off shall be disposed of by means of drainage systems constructed within lots 500 and 501 to the satisfaction and specification of the Council.

4) Except to the extent necessary for the construction of approved buildings, driveways, and fire breaks no land shall be cleared of vegetation without the prior written approval of the Council.

5) The Council may, as a condition of any approval granted under special provision 4), require the owner or occupier of the land to plant and maintain to its satisfaction native endemic trees and shrubs to promote the natural setting of the area.

6) In the proposed new lots (which includes lots which have existing buildings upon):

a) Water will be supplied by bore and rain water until scheme water becomes available through the provision of reticulated water to serve the future residential land on the east side of Wanneroo Road (opposite to the subject land), at which time the landowner must connect within 2 years. To ensure performance of this obligation, prior to applying for subdivision, landowners shall enter into a legal agreement with the City to ensure that the owner of each of the newly subdivided lots agrees to this obligation, and provides a bond to this City in respect to the undertaking of the work involved. Separate bore licences for each title will be negotiated as appropriate. Prior to connection to scheme water, a person shall not construct a dwelling unless a concrete water tank of not less than 90,000 litres or other type of domestic water supply approved by Council is incorporated in the plans and constructed at the same time as the dwelling.

b) Sewerage disposal will be provided by a nutrient attenuating system until deep sewerage becomes available through the provision of reticulated sewerage to serve the future residential land on the east side of Wanneroo Road (opposite to the subject land), at which time the landowner must connect within 2 years. To ensure performance of this obligation, prior to applying for subdivision, landowners shall enter into a legal agreement with the City to ensure that the owner of each of the newly subdivided lots agrees to this obligation, and provides a bond to this City in respect to the undertaking of the work involved.

Construction requirements for nutrient attenuating on-site sewage disposal systems:

i) the underside of effluent disposal chambers shall be a minimum of five hundred (500) millimetres above the estimated maximum water table level as determined pursuant to Special Provision 11).

ii) the effluent disposal chambers or effluent disposal pads shall be a minimum horizontal distance of fifty (50) metres from areas determined by the City of Wanneroo to be subject to periodic inundation.

7) A notification to the satisfaction of Council shall be placed on all new titles making reference to the impact of the poultry farm existing to the north east of the subject land, the impact of midge and mosquitoes associated with proximity to Lake Joondalup, and the likelihood that southbound access from the lots will be restricted when the second carriageway is built for the adjacent Wanneroo Road.

8) Buildings and effluent disposal systems shall not be constructed outside of the building envelopes designated on the Development Guide Plan except where approved by Council.

9) Firebreaks shall be constructed along all proposed lot boundaries prior to creation of the titles for the new lots, to Council’s specifications.

10) Fire hydrants shall be provided by the landowners to the satisfaction of the Fire and Emergency Services Authority, at the time that reticulated water services are provided to the proposed new lots. At subdivision application stage, landowners shall enter into an arrangement (which may include provision of a bond) with the Fire and Emergency Services, to the satisfaction of that Authority, to ensure provision of fire hydrants at the appropriate time.

11) Prior to making application to subdivide the land, the landowner shall submit, to Council’s satisfaction, a report which is prepared by a suitably qualified person which provides detailed advice regarding estimated maximum groundwater levels and areas subject to periodic inundation for this land, adequate to enable Council to properly determine requirements for levels for buildings and on-site effluent disposal systems.

12) Buildings shall be constructed at such levels as the Council may require to ensure reasonable avoidance of risk of flooding, having regard for the estimated maximum groundwater levels to be prepared pursuant to Special Provision 11).

2. ENDORSES the plan shown in Attachment No. 2 to this report as the Development Guide Plan for this proposed Special Residential Zone, subject to the following changes being made:

a) it being labelled ‘Development Guide Plan’;

b) proposed lots sizes and dimensions being shown;

c) future lot boundaries in the vicinity of the access points from Wanneroo Road being re-drawn to correctly show that each proposed lot will have some lot frontage to Wanneroo Road at these points. Fencing and gate locations, and areas to be subject to reciprocal access rights, are also to be shown to ensure that these access points function satisfactorily in traffic engineering terms;

d) building envelopes for all proposed lots being shown, including dimensions of each envelope and distances of each envelope from adjacent lot boundaries.

3. SUBMITS Amendment No. 15 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for consent to advertise for public submissions.

4. REFERS Amendment No. 15 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act.

5. REQUIRES the applicant to commission a suitably qualified person to prepare an assessment of the impact on this proposal of the nearby poultry farm and that the assessment report be considered by Council when it considers submissions received following advertising of Amendment No. 15.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Development Applications

PD07-07/02 Lot 123 (29) Brazier Road, Yanchep - Two Storey Dwelling

File Ref: 62875

File Name: EALot123.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 27 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 27 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by David Woo Date 11 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider approval of a two storey dwelling with proposed variations to the Residential Planning Codes and the City’s Height and Scale Policy.

Applicant	Stephen Browne
Owner	Murray Mills
Location	Lot 123 (29) Brazier Road, Yanchep
Site Area	865m²
DPS 2 Zoning	Residential

Background

Application received for a two storey dwelling on Lot 123 (29) Brazier Road, Yanchep (refer Attachment 1).

Detail

Proposal

The proposal depicts a two storey rendered brick dwelling with a flat roof construction. The dwelling incorporates an indoor swimming pool and internal courtyard (refer Attachment 2).

Compliance

The application has been assessed against the provisions of the District Planning Scheme No.2, Residential Planning Codes and the City’s Height and Scale Policy. The application proposes the following variations:

1. Variation to Table 1 of the Residential Planning Codes – Rear Setback - 6m average required; 4.22m average with a 1.4m minimum provided.

2. Variation to Figure 3 of the Residential Planning Codes – Side Setback (Ground Floor South) – Home Gym requires 2.6m, provided 1.5m. Remaining section of wall requires 2.3m, 1.0m provided.

3. Variation to Figure 3 of the Residential Planning Codes – Side Setback (Upper Floor South) – 1.9m required, 1.5m provided.

4. Variation to Figure 3 of the Residential Planning Codes – Side Setback (Upper Floor North) – 2.0m required; 1.55m provided.

5. Variation to Height and Scale Policy - Building Height Envelope – The proposed development exceeds the maximum height of 8.5m from natural ground level and encroaches beyond the building threshold envelope.

6. Variation to Height and Scale Policy - Plot Ratio – 0.5 (432.5m²) permitted, 0.55 (479.97m²) provided.

Consultation

In accordance with the provisions of the City’s Height and Scale Policy, the application was advertised to the adjacent landowners for a period of 14 days from the 22 May 2002. Two objections were received and have been summarised below:

Comment

Administration Comment

Adjacent Owner

· As the owners house is on the south side of the proposed development and being single storey the solar hot water system will be affected to some degree by their two storey section.

· Second concern is connected to the varying levels of the block. The proposal states that a retaining wall is required to contain the fill and bring the level up to the level of No.27.

“When we purchased some ten years ago both 27 and 29 were a deep hollow and our home actually has two rooms which were built as a split level but which will now be below their ground level to this fill. I have no objection to the fill as such but would like to know what protection I can expect with regard to its compaction, and also what to expect in the way of a side fence.”

· Noted. The second storey will be predominately forward of the dwelling.

· No. 29 Brazier Road will be raised by approximately 2.0m of fill for approximately half the length of the boundary along the southern boundary.

· The proposal does include considerable fill however this is permitted providing the proposed development ultimately complies with the relevant laws and policies.

· Fencing is a civil matter to be resolved between the two owners. The type of material proposed for the retaining wall and fence has not been stipulated in the application.

Adjacent Owner

· Object to the northern setback of the proposed residence as it will bring the two homes too close together. Recommend the setback as per the Council design guidelines be adopted.

· The applicant has proposed variation to the upper floor northern side setback. The variation has raised concern with Administration in relation to building bulk. This issue is discussed further within the Comment section of the report.

The application was also referred to the Western Australian Planning Commission for comment for a period of 30 days in accordance with the Notice of Delegation as the subject lot directly abuts a Metropolitan Region Scheme Reserve for Parks and Recreation. The WAPC had no objection to the proposal.

Comment

The applicant is seeking the Council’s support for a number of variations mentioned earlier. Variation to the rear setback is considered acceptable as the proposal offers a minimum courtyard of 40m² in addition to the provision of an internal courtyard central to the dwelling. These areas provide outdoor living and open space without impacting on the amenity of adjacent landowners. While the variation to the rear setback is considered acceptable the side setbacks may potentially impact on the amenity of the adjacent owners in relation to building bulk on the boundary.

The variations to the ground floor setbacks to the southern side range from 0.8m to 1.6m. The extent of the variation sought is largely a result of the increased ground levels proposed along the southern boundary. The finish floor level of the dwelling (12.5 metres RL) is up to 2.2m above the natural ground level of the southern side boundary and has resulted in increased setbacks to the building on the ground floor. It is however, acknowledged that a retaining wall will more than likely be built along the southern boundary with 1.8m high fencing installed on top and will protect against overlooking. Notwithstanding this the minimum setbacks as required under the Residential Planning Codes for walls longer than 9.0m should be adhered to. It is recommended that the setback to the ground floor on the southern side boundary be increased to a minimum of 1.5m.

Variations to the upper floor setback range between 0.4m and 0.5m. While considered minor having no major openings proposed on the side elevations, the impact of the variation is realised in the encroachment of the building past the building threshold envelope of the City’s Height and Scale Policy. The setback requirements of the Residential Planning Codes could be met with minimal change to the development required and would reduce building bulk on the boundary. It is recommended that the northern side upper floor setback be increased to 2.0m and the southern side upper floor setback be increased to 1.9m, to meet the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes.

The development also exceeds the maximum height and plot ratio specified in the City’s Policy. The maximum height of the building is measured at 9.2m. However, due to the site contours of the lot, the majority of the building remains well under the 8.5m maximum height requirement because of the flat roof construction. The plot ratio is exceeded by approximately 47.5m² however is not considered excessive. The design of the building is such that the upper floor of the building is setback approximately 28.5 metres from the street so the overall appearance of the dwelling does not appear excessively bulky from the street or out of character with the locality.

While the variations sought are numerous they must also be considered in the context of the objectives of the Residential Planning Codes and the City’s Height and Scale Policy. The objectives of the Codes are to:

· Encourage the development of a wide range of dwelling types;

· Ensure adequate standards of privacy, daylighting, sunshine and safety for all dwellings;

· Provide appropriate levels of car parking, access, incidental open space and storage and drying facilities for each type of dwelling;

· Protect the amenity of adjacent buildings by minimising overshadowing, overlooking and visual intrusion;

· Enhance the amenity of residential areas in relation to building size, streetscape, space about buildings, density and landscaping.

The objectives of the Policy are to ensure that all development within a residential area is of a suitable height and scale and designed with due regard to the protection and enhancement of the amenity and streetscape character of the surrounding area.

The locality is characterised by largely undulating land with the subject lot located between two dunes. The dwellings either side are located on higher natural ground levels and have considerably higher finish floor levels than the dwelling proposed. Also, the dwelling to the north is three storeys in height and will remain considerably higher despite the fill proposed on the southern boundary.

Having considered the surrounding locality and existing streetscape, the development is considered to meet the above objectives with the exception of bulk and space about buildings. This issue however, can be addressed by increasing the upper floor and ground floor setbacks. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be supported subject to appropriate conditions being imposed.

Statutory Compliance

Variation is sought to Residential Planning Codes in relation to the rear setback and ground and upper floor setbacks.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Variation is sought to exceed to the building threshold envelope and plot ratio requirements of the City’s Height and Scale Policy.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the two storey dwelling on Lot 123 (29) Brazier Road, Yanchep in accordance with the plans attached to and forming part of this report and subject to the following:

1. The ground floor setback to the southern side boundary being increased to a minimum of 1.5m.

2. The upper floor setback to the southern side boundary being increased by 0.4m to 1.9m.

3. The upper floor setback to the northern side boundary being increased by 0.45m to 2.0m.

4. All stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the City.

5. The driveways and crossover shall be designed and constructed to the residential specifications and to the satisfaction of the City, before occupation of dwellings.

6. Retaining walls are to be provided where the angle of natural repose of the soil cannot be maintained. Drawn details signed by a practicing Structural engineer, must be submitted for approval.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 1 of 2

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Delegated Authority Reports

PD08-07/02 Development Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For May 2002

File Ref: 64436

File Name: FADevApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by David Woo Date 11 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Development Applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 May 2002 and 31 May 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.

Background

Nil

Detail

The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes (R Codes.)

The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures with between 80 to 130 development applications being received per month in addition to an average of 400 to 500 building license applications.

Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to Council Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.

Council Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.

Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 May 2002 and 31 May 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1.

Please note that DA01/1194 was determined at full Council.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Nil

Statutory Compliance

A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 14 August 2001 (item W340-08/01 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning & Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1 May 2002 and 31 May 2002.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA01/0677 09/08/2001 TOM HARRISON & KEVIN R HARRISON 163 $0.00 Refused

Prop address 1976 WANNEROO ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031

Land Lot 50 D 83542 Vol 1952 Fol 612

Description SALE OF BIRDS/FISH/NURSERY PLANTS AND ACCESSORIES

Applicants KEVIN R HARRISON

File Number 12147

DA01/1144 15/11/2001 ZRINSKI NOMINEES PTY LTD 129 $10,000.00 Approved

Prop address 39 MADELEY STREET LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1271 DP 247639 Vol 1295 Fol 291

Description EARTHWORKS - to level lot

Applicants ZRINSKI NOMINEES PTY LTD

File Number 71070

DA01/1194 23/11/2001 CITY OF WANNEROO 118 $3,534,000.00 Approved

Prop address QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PARK 2 QUINNS ROAD MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 211 D 27023 Vol 485 Fol 181A

Description COMMUNITY FACILITY AND RESTAURANT/CAFE

Applicants CITY OF WANNEROO

File Number 07524-9176

DA02/0154 04/02/2002 CHHABRA R GROVER 35 $127,000.00 Approved

Prop address 22 WEYMOUTH BOULEVARD QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 49 D 92370 Vol 2143 Fol 382

Description Two Storey Dwelling

Applicants NORFOLK HOMES

File Number 67187

DA02/0196 11/02/2002 ROLF MEYER 78 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 CARINDA PLACE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064

Land Lot 127 P 15707

Description Vary Commercial Vehicle Parking

Applicants ROLF MEYER

File Number 65915

DA02/0323 08/03/2002 MICHAEL J FORDE & ANN G FORDE 41 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 39 MOKUTU COURT QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 694 DP 28144 Vol 2507 Fol 853

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0383 21/03/2002 DEBORAH L CLARK & MICHAEL V CLARK 51 $166,497.00 Approved

Prop address 1 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 590 DP 28947 Vol 2509 Fol 373

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0391 21/03/2002 CARL BASSO-BRUSA, MARK BASSO-BRUSA, PAUL 18 $12,000.00 Refused

Prop address 69 CHALLENGE BOULEVARD WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 58 P 17245

Description Proposed covered loading bay

Applicants DELSTRAT PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0393 22/03/2002 ANGELICA BASSO-BRUSA & BRUNO BASSO-BRUSA 9 $150,000.00 Approved

Prop address 33 MOTIVATION DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 308 DP 25979 Vol 2215 Fol 636

Description Industrial - Commercial Development Office Warehouse

Applicants DELSTRAT PTY LTD

File Number 73403

DA02/0405 25/03/2002 STACIE LE & THIEN H NGUYEN 37 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 71 EVERGLADES PARADE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1542 P 24321 Vol 2204 Fol 628

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0410 26/03/2002 JODIE CORRY, MARK W CORRY, JEANETTE V 48 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 MOBILIA PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 66 DP 25803 Vol 2503 Fol 27

Description Building Envelope Modification

Applicants JODIE CORRY, MARK W CORRY, JEANETTE V YOUNG

File Number

DA02/0414 26/03/2002 PHYLLIS E HALL & FREEHOLD ENTERPRISES PTY 27 $40,000.00 Approved

Prop address YANCHEP CHILD CARE 61 LAGOON DRIVE YANCHEP WA 6035

Land Lot 1 D 89664

Description CHILD CARE CENTRE

Applicants GREGORY R MAINSTONE

File Number

DA02/0415 26/03/2002 HESTER HOLDINGS PTY LTD 37 $30,000.00 Approved

Prop address 26 TURNBULL ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031

Land Lot 26 D 63842 Vol 1630 Fol 961

Description FACTORY EXTENSION

Applicants KEYTOWN CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number 18264

DA02/0420 26/03/2002 ELENA MATEI & ION V MATEI 29 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 35 RAYNER DRIVE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 358 P 19910 Vol 2014 Fol 431

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMPLETE DEVELOPMENTS

File Number

DA02/0438 28/03/2002 REEFKING PTY LTD 31 $30,000.00 Approved

Prop address SHOPPING CENTRE 36 ANCHORAGE DRIVE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 2 D 94198 Vol 2150 Fol 129 S/P 40474

Description Extension to Shopping Centre

Applicants RAY JACKSON

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0452 03/04/2002 JANICE PATTERSON & JOHN P PATTERSON 23 $37,972.00 Approved

Prop address 49 SANDGATE WAY MARANGAROO WA 6064

Land Lot 523 P 15332 Vol 1716 Fol 256

Description Other Development Application Category Not Listed FREE STANDING GRANNY FLAT

Applicants DAVID BROWNING BUILDING SERVICES

File Number

DA02/0458 04/04/2002 HOMER HOLDINGS PTY LTD 13 $800,000.00 Approved

Prop address 30 PARAMOUNT DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 101 D 91477 Vol 2089 Fol 993

Description Factory Units

Applicants CALIBRE CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0475 08/04/2002 SHAUN A PROCTER & LARA N LEWIS 28 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 EVERSDEN CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 250 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 914

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0485 09/04/2002 DEIDRE M WEBB 19 $92,664.00 Approved

Prop address 30 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 258 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 922

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0486 09/04/2002 SARAH-JAYNE POWELL & VICTOR A POWELL 27 $151,817.00 Approved

Prop address 6 CINTRA WAY LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1294 DP 29495 Vol 2219 Fol 942

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0490 10/04/2002 FRANCIS J GALLOWAY & SHEILA E HOLT 30 $125,876.00 Approved

Prop address 52 MINTARO PARADE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 527 DP 30432 Vol 2518 Fol 226

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0498 12/04/2002 TERESA E HABER & JAMES A HABER 22 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 5 BADDESLEY STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 736 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 432

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0501 15/04/2002 ROBERT A ROBINSON 15 $1.00 Approved

Prop address DÉCOR 10 ROCCA WAY WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 3 Vol 1908 Fol 241 S/P 21521

Description SOFT FURNISHINGS RETAIL & MANUFACTURE

Applicants ROBERT A ROBINSON, BHUPENDRA CHAUHAN

File Number 166276

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0502 15/04/2002 KARL H RIEKMAN 19 $10,824.00 Approved

Prop address 110 ZIATAS ROAD PINJAR WA 6065

Land Part Lot 4 D 57378 Vol 1705 Fol 364

Description GARAGE

Applicants HIGHLINE BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number 70951

DA02/0509 15/04/2002 BRENDAN S HALL 13 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 21 BELLERIVE BOULEVARD MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 115 P 22596 Vol 2137 Fol 715

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0510 15/04/2002 BENJAMIN S THOMAS & EVE M THOMAS 15 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 10 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 806 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 263

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0519 17/04/2002 PETER J BATTAMS 22 $7,900.00 Approved

Prop address 40 EVERGREEN GARDENS CARRAMAR WA 6031

Land Lot 145 D 70624 Vol 1744 Fol 511

Description Paddocks and Keeping of Two (2) Horses

Applicants PETER J BATTAMS

File Number 70498

DA02/0540 22/04/2002 STUART J FORSYTH 28 $1.00 Approved

Prop address 12 TYSON PLACE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 525 P 8179 Vol 92 Fol 104A

Description RETAINING WALLS

Applicants STUART J FORSYTH

File Number 03395

DA02/0541 22/04/2002 CHRISTOPHER G ROBINSON & JEANE ROBINSON 22 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 48 CAMIRA WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 576 DP 30432 Vol 2518 Fol 236

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0543 23/04/2002 KARLA L STARKEY & LEE J STARKEY 9 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 11 WARNFORD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 887 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 868

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants KARLA L STARKEY

File Number

DA02/0550 24/04/2002 MARGARET L COGAN 9 $4,400.00 Approved

Prop address 12 OLDHAM WAY YANCHEP WA 6035

Land Lot 368 P 10181 Vol 1720 Fol 576

Description Carport in front of existing garage

Applicants WA PATIOS & PERGOLAS

File Number 10939

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0551 24/04/2002 JAMIE C SMITH & JOANNE G SMITH 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 5 FREDERICK STREET WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 21 D 51205 Vol 1440 Fol 089

Description Garage to Dwelling

Applicants JAMIE C SMITH, JOANNE G SMITH

File Number

DA02/0553 24/04/2002 FINBARR P RAMSAY & FAIRLEY RAMSAY 5 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 LAUTOKA RISE MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1410 DP 28984 Vol 2218 Fol 214

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0556 24/04/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 20 $62,335.00 Approved

Prop address 11 YORLOR WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 803 DP 30924

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0558 24/04/2002 CAVERSHAM PROPERTY PTY LTD 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 87 DALVIK AVENUE MERRIWA WA 6030

Land Lot 1901 DP 28210

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0562 26/04/2002 R W HANSEN FIDELITY PTY LTD 10 $4,150.00 Approved

Prop address 235 MCLENNAN DRIVE NOWERGUP WA 6032

Land Lot 100 P 14371 Vol 1654 Fol 583

Description Rural Shed

Applicants R W HANSEN FIDELITY PTY LTD

File Number 06519

DA02/0564 29/04/2002 SKENDER NOMINEES PTY LTD 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7/48 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 7 Vol 1601 Fol 131 S/P 8859

Description Change of Use - Showroom to Vehicle Sales Premise

Applicants RON LEASK

File Number

DA02/0569 29/04/2002 HAYDEE N MARTINEZ & ROBERTO MARTINEZ 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 BADCOE ALLEY CLARKSON WA 6030

Land Lot 101 DP 28090 Vol 2509 Fol 850

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0570 29/04/2002 ANTONIO PINA 8 $65,496.00 Approved

Prop address 29 ADELONG CIRCUIT MERRIWA WA 6030

Land Lot 1892 DP 28210 Vol 2509 Fol 930

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0571 29/04/2002 EDWARD C HEMSLEY & LYNETT B HEMSLEY 16 $2,000.00 Approved

Prop address 6A CANNON COURT ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064

Land Lot 2 S/P 18777

Description Gazebo to Duplex

Applicants EDWARD C HEMSLEY, LYNETT B HEMSLEY

File Number 62 697

DA02/0576 30/04/2002 CAROLYN J BUDGE & GRAHAM N BUDGE 8 $20,000.00 Approved

Prop address 440 SYDNEY ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Part Lot 15 D 33000 Vol 1999 Fol 765

Description Additions to Single House

Applicants CAROLYN J BUDGE, GRAHAM N BUDGE

File Number 12937

DA02/0577 30/04/2002 MALGORZATA KING & PETER G KING 6 $97,552.00 Approved

Prop address 5 HOLLINS BEND MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 115 DP 28269 Vol 2513 Fol 015

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0580 30/04/2002 NATHANIEL P PESTELL 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 94 ST STEPHENS CRESCENT TAPPING WA 6065

Land Lot 1325 DP 29587 Vol 2512 Fol 382

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0581 30/04/2002 JOHN E TYLER & SANDRA M TYLER 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 FLINT CLOSE PEARSALL WA 6065

Land Lot 209 DP 28877 Vol 2509 Fol 945

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0582 30/04/2002 ROCCO MARSICO & TERESA MARSICO 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 WALBROOK MEWS LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 739 P 22690 Vol 2134 Fol 456

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0583 30/04/2002 HEATHER R ROWE 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 35 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 194 DP 27702 Vol 2509 Fol 581

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants CONTENT LIVING PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0584 30/04/2002 DUNCAN C WATT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 SEFTON PLACE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1262 DP 29495 Vol 2219 Fol 917

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants CONTENT LIVING

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0588 30/04/2002 ANTONINO CHISARI & GIUSEPINA CHISARI 9 $600,000.00 Approved

Prop address 2 CALABRESE AVENUE WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 20 D 42097 Vol 1383 Fol 442

Description Showroom/Warehouse Development

Applicants ANTONINO CHISARI, GIUSEPINA CHISARI

File Number 70519

DA02/0590 30/04/2002 JOHN R ROBINSON & LUCILLE P ROBINSON 2 $125,629.00 Approved

Prop address 6 WORDSWORTH DRIVE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 110 DP 29961 Vol 2515 Fol 382

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

DA02/0592 30/04/2002 RODNEY L DRYDEN & DEANNA L VESEY 1 $110,640.00 Approved

Prop address 61 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 532 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 403

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0595 01/05/2002 IVAN J CUNNINGHAM 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 OARE LANE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 614 DP 28947 Vol 2509 Fol 377

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0597 01/05/2002 JEREMY N DICKENSON & GEMMA L HENNIGAN 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 7 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 947 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 288

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants CONTENT LIVING

File Number

DA02/0598 01/05/2002 MARK W TAYLOR & KYLIE E TAYLOR 7 $6,000.00 Approved

Prop address 98 CARABOODA ROAD CARABOODA WA 6033

Land Part Lot 32 P 8913 Vol 1962 Fol 951

Description COLORBOND STORAGE SHED

Applicants AVALON SHEDS AND STABLES

File Number 18015

DA02/0603 02/05/2002 DARRAN M GUEST & SHARON M GUEST 16 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 4 MARINERS VIEW MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1403 DP 28984 Vol 2519 Fol 207

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants RENOWNED GROUP

File Number

DA02/0604 02/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 8 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 73 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 746 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0606 02/05/2002 ROSCIC CHILDRENS TRUST 19 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 3/38 ACHIEVEMENT WAY WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 3 S/P 28891

Description Change of Use

Applicants STUART CROCKETT

File Number 05659

DA02/0610 03/05/2002 SHANE R SMITH 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 36 GLENGYLE TURN QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 450 DP 27516 Vol 2215 Fol 158

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0611 03/05/2002 JONELLE R MCKANE & LUCAS MCKANE 2 $76,300.00 Approved

Prop address 9 ASHCOTT GATE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 236 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 905

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0613 03/05/2002 ELVIN Y LEE 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 19 EDGBASTON DRIVE MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 225 DP 28994 Vol 2511 Fol 952

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PERCEPTIONS THE HOME BUILDERS

File Number

DA02/0614 03/05/2002 GEOFFREY R KIERNAN & CATHERINE M KIERNAN 5 $10,000.00 Approved

Prop address 12 SHAMROCK COURT TWO ROCKS WA 6037

Land Lot 183 P 10776 Vol 1379 Fol 592

Description SHED

Applicants GEOFFREY R KIERNAN, CATHERINE M KIERNAN

File Number 65181

DA02/0615 03/05/2002 GAYLE JOHNSON 9 $86,593.00 Approved

Prop address 6 ASHCOTT GATE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 219 DP 31251 Vol 2516 Fol 703

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0617 03/05/2002 TAYLOR WOODROW AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 2 $150,000.00 Approved

Prop address 3 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 191 DP 27702

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants JAXON CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number

DA02/0619 06/05/2002 DARREN I HILL & SIMONA HILL 12 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 60 MINTARO PARADE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 531 DP 30432 Vol 2518 Fol 230

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0621 06/05/2002 FRANCESCO SITA & MARIA R SITA 18 $30,000.00 Approved

Prop address 15 ATTWELL STREET LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 79 D 57260 Vol 1559 Fol 839

Description FACTORY OFFICE/TOILET ADDITION

Applicants TREVOR TAYOR

File Number 11884

DA02/0622 06/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 6 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 983 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 480

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants Don Russell

File Number

DA02/0624 01/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 18 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 32 CONISTON PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 647 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 467

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0627 07/05/2002 CARNEGIE PARK (NO 3) PTY LTD 2 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 11 WYOLA LANE WANNEROO WA 6065

Land Lot 150 DP 29015

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0628 06/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 9 WARNFORD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 888 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PRIME PROJECTS

File Number

DA02/0629 06/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 33 STAPLEHURST CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 632 DP 29301

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PRIME PROJECTS

File Number

DA02/0630 06/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 12 ORWELL WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 885 DP 29959

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PRIME PROJECTS

File Number

DA02/0632 07/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 72 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 665 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PRIME PROJECTS

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0635 07/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 17 $96,500.00 Approved

Prop address 66 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 643 DP 31249

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0636 07/05/2002 DAVID A WRIGHT & CAROLINE WRIGHT 2 $114,314.00 Approved

Prop address 69 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 208 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 921

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES

File Number

DA02/0637 07/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 2 $83,000.00 Approved

Prop address 82 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 697 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0638 07/05/2002 CHERYL A BROWN & STEPHEN R BROWN 2 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 6 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 808 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 265

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0645 01/05/2002 LESLEY J BELL & RONALD P BRACEBRIDGE 18 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 CONISTON PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 751 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 964

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0647 01/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 6 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 984 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 481

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0649 09/05/2002 ANTE BARIC & MARINA BARIC 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 10 PINKERTON AVENUE HOCKING WA 6065

Land Lot 66 P 24256 Vol 2206 Fol 471

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants MANOR HOME BUILDERS PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0650 09/05/2002 PHUONG C HO & TRUNG V PHAM 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 32 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 259 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 923

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0652 09/05/2002 BECKY E GRAME & PHILIP J GRAME 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 29 CAMBORNE PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 796 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 257

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0653 09/05/2002 TRACY A HOLLAND & STEPHEN P HOLLAND 5 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 1 EVERSDEN CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 252 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 916

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants PIVOT WAY

File Number

DA02/0655 09/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 5 ASHCOTT GATE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 234 DP 29301

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0658 10/05/2002 MARGARET A ROWE & REGINALD J ROWE 15 $112,000.00 Approved

Prop address 11 CHALLENGE BOULEVARD WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 24 P 17245

Description Warehouse Addition

Applicants STEVE MAWSON & ASSCOIATES

File Number

DA02/0664 10/05/2002 HOMAIRA NAIM & SAFIULLAH NAIM 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 57 EVERGLADES PARADE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1549 DP 27680 Vol 2218 Fol 036

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants J CORP

File Number

DA02/0668 13/05/2002 IRENE D LINDEN & ROBERT P LINDEN 12 $101,948.00 Approved

Prop address 1 CLARAFIELD MEANDER TAPPING WA 6065

Land Lot 1309 DP 29587 Vol 2512 Fol 366

Description Ancillary Accomodation

Applicants IRENE D LINDEN, ROBERT P LINDEN

File Number

DA02/0675 13/05/2002 PAMELA M O'NEILL & LAZER BLAGOJEVIC 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 23 DRIVER ROAD DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 227 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 938

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0677 13/05/2002 CATHERINE M ORMESHER 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 29 RENDELL WAY KOONDOOLA WA 6064

Land Lot 1142 P 11288 Vol 1441 Fol 741

Description Carport to Dwelling

Applicants QUALITY PATIOS & CARPORTS

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0679 13/05/2002 MELANIE T GRAY 4 $113,916.00 Approved

Prop address 10 HOLLINS BEND MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 184 DP 28269

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0680 13/05/2002 SHAHRADA KHAN & PATRICK W STEVENSON 1 $130,000.00 Approved

Prop address 31 ARDMORE TERRACE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 218 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 929

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SHAHRADA KHAN, PATRICK W STEVENSON

File Number

DA02/0681 14/05/2002 DOROTHY H DRABIK & PASQUALE JIRITANO 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 4 CINTRA WAY LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1295 DP 29495 Vol 2219 Fol 943

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0687 15/05/2002 JODIE CORRY, MARK W CORRY, JEANETTE V 4 $333,000.00 Approved

Prop address 8 MOBILIA PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 66 DP 25803 Vol 2503 Fol 27

Description DWELLING

Applicants TONY TRLIN & CO BUILDERS

File Number 73426

DA02/0691 15/05/2002 MARK C ZAMPOGNA & RENEE R ZAMPOGNA 12 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 10 WARNFORD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 923 DP 29959 Vol 2513 Fol 879

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0692 15/05/2002 MAHA SEIDAWI 7 $121,472.00 Approved

Prop address 30 GLENGYLE TURN QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 453 DP 27516 Vol 2215 Fol 161

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0693 15/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 74 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 666 DP 30598

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants WESTCOURT

File Number

DA02/0695 16/05/2002 GARY ATTFIELD & MICHELLE A ATTFIELD 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 12 SHROPSHIRE CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 383 DP 31440 Vol 2517 Fol 439

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants JAXON CONSTRUCTIONS

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0698 16/05/2002 JUDITH A SILVERLOCK 10 $40,000.00 Approved

Prop address 63 GOLFVIEW PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 211 DP 24895 Vol 2212 Fol 756

Description Rural Sheds

Applicants DAVID SILVERLOCK

File Number 73328

DA02/0699 16/05/2002 MARY M FLETCHER 9 $1,100.00 Approved

Prop address 2/26 SALCOTT ROAD GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064

Land Lot 2 Vol 2508 Fol 33 S/P 40693

Description Patio to Unit 2

Applicants MARY M FLETCHER

File Number

DA02/0706 16/05/2002 A & D PESCE NOMINEES PTY LTD 9 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 13/51 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065

Land Lot 13 S/P 30454

Description Change of Use

Applicants LESLIE MAITLAND

File Number

DA02/0707 13/05/2002 SILVAN LUCACIU & EMILIA LUCACIU 14 $100,000.00 Approved

Prop address 65 ABBOTSWOOD DRIVE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1359 D 99533 Vol 2190 Fol 349

Description SINGLE HOUSE

Applicants S RAVI

File Number

DA02/0708 17/05/2002 SINA HEMMATI & MAHNAZ HEMMATI 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 KING DAVID BOULEVARD MADELEY WA 6065

Land Lot 186 DP 27810 Vol 2506 Fol 938

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants SINA HEMMATI, MAHNAZ HEMMATI

File Number

DA02/0720 20/05/2002 ROBERT W YOUNG & SHELLEY M YOUNG 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 63 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 531 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 402

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0721 20/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 25 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 608 DP 29301

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0722 20/05/2002 DESMOND J ROGERS 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 8 ASHCOTT GATE BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 220 DP 31251 Vol 2516 Fol 704

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0723 20/05/2002 PAUL W SWARBRICK & LORRAE A CINQUINA 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 1 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 981 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 478

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0724 20/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 944 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 285

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0727 20/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 9 SOBERTON STREET BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 928 DP 30599

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0735 21/05/2002 KIM RISELEY & TERRENCE J RISELEY 3 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 16 NOTTINGHAM GREEN QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 87 P 23646 Vol 2177 Fol 208

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES

File Number

DA02/0740 21/05/2002 ANNE-MARIA COLMAN & CHRISTOPHER J COLMAN 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 101 CASSILDA WAY TWO ROCKS WA 6037

Land Lot 110 P 10185 Vol 620 Fol 198A

Description Garage to Dwelling

Applicants HERITAGE OUTDOOR LEISURE CENTRE

File Number

DA02/0744 22/05/2002 JAMES M COAD & LEAH M COAD 1 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 99 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065

Land Lot 146 DP 27702 Vol 2509 Fol 550

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD

File Number

DA02/0746 22/05/2002 DARREN S LOFTUS & JANINE M LOFTUS 7 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 5 FAIRPORT VISTA MINDARIE WA 6030

Land Lot 1594 DP 28984 Vol 2218 Fol 261

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES

File Number

DA02/0753 24/05/2002 NORTH WHITFORDS ESTATES PTY LTD 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 27 FIRMSTONE CIRCLE LANDSDALE WA 6065

Land Lot 1253 DP 29495

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE

File Number

Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo

WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/05/2002 00:00:00 AND 31/05/2002

Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable

Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision

DA02/0754 24/05/2002 FIVE STAR ASSET PTY LTD 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 15 KENSINGTON WAY PEARSALL WA 6065

Land Lot 12 P 24311

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

DA02/0770 27/05/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 3 $96,035.00 Approved

Prop address 6 SHROPSHIRE CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036

Land Lot 380 DP 31440

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants CONTENT LIVING

File Number

DA02/0771 28/05/2002 GAVIN W LAWSON & MARTENA L LAWSON 2 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 12 DARTMOUTH CIRCLE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030

Land Lot 244 P 24153 Vol 2195 Fol 352

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants VENTURA HOMES

File Number

DA02/0796 30/05/2002 WILLIAM R LANGLANDS 0 $0.00 Approved

Prop address 40 TWILIGHT CIRCUIT RIDGEWOOD WA 6030

Land Lot 218 P 19362 Vol 1984 Fol 859

Description Single Dwelling

Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD

File Number

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD09-07/02 Subdivision Applications Determined By Delegated Authority In May 2002

File Ref: 64346

File Name: FCSubApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 10 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 13

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Determination of subdivision applications processed in the period between 1 May and 31 May 2002 under delegated authority.

Detail

The West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.

Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Division this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.

Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.

SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).

SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.

SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.

SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.

SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.

SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.

The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority between 1 May and 31 May 2002.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTE the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority between 1 May and 31 May 2002 as listed:

WAPC No/Recd.

Location /Owner

Zoning / LDU Category

Advice

WAPC Advised

117816

02/1/2002

Lot 906 (999) Connolly Drive, Merriwa

Caversham Property Pty Ltd

Residential

SCU1

Supported

Note: application originally deferred on 17/1/02

09/05/2002

118457

19/04/2002

Lot 25 (8) Kings Lynn Rise, Mindarie

Culgadine Pty Ltd & BND Investments Pty Ltd

Marina

SCU1

Supported

01/05/2002

118766

05/04/02

Lot 9003 (133C) Clarkson Avenue, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

02/05/2002

118795

05/04/2002

Lot 59 (193) Landsdale Road, Landsdale

L & R Leupen

Urban Development

SCU6

Not Supported

Poultry Buffer

06/05/2002

118836

15/04/2002

Lot 89 (16) Goldsworthy Entrance, Alexander Heights

C & N Crosara

Reservation –Other Regional Roads / Residential

SCU5

Supported

07/05/202

118838

15/04/2002

Pt Lot 19 (54) Archer Street, Pearsall

AHL Holdings Ltd

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

21/05/2002

118864

26/04/2002

Lot 51 (1) St Malo Court, Mindarie

Bullfinch Nominees Pty Ltd & Ridgecroft Holdings Pty Ltd

Marina

SCU1

Supported

07/05/2002

118865

15/04/2002

Lot 9003 (133C) Clarkson Avenue, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

01/05/2002

118882

19/04/2002

Lot 20 (105) East Road, Hocking

AHL Holdings Ltd

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

22/05/2002

10.

118883

19/04/2002

Lot 9003 (133C) Clarkson Avenue, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

07/05/2002

11.

118898

19/04/2002

Lot 4 (400) Pinjar Road, Mariginiup

TD & TB Nguyen

Rural Resource

SCU1

Supported

22/05/2002

12.

119041

07/05/2002

Lot 330 (9) Asche Way, Two Rocks

A & E Boothroyd

Residential

SCU1

Supported

Amalgamation

22/05/2002

13.

119046

14/05/2002

Pt Lt 1435 (43) Golders Way, Girrawheen

Homeswest Rentals

Residential

SCU5

Supported

30/05/2002

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Economic Development

PD10-07/02 Small Business Development Corporation Conference: Waiver Of Venue Charges

File Ref: PA7/0001V01

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

File Name: GAfghxxx.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider waiving the City of Wanneroo’s facilities hire charge to the Small Business Development Corporation (SBDC) for its Annual conference from October 13-15, 2002.

Background

SBDC is a Western Australian State Government agency focused on the development of the small business sector and is committed to:

· championing the cause of small business;

· developing programs and services to meet the needs of small business development;

· establishing and strengthening relationships between SBDC and key agencies (public and private sector)

The SBDC has a partnership arrangement with 37 Business Enterprise Centres (BEC) including 10 metropolitan operations. The City is serviced by a regional BEC that is located in the City of Joondalup, however approximately half of the BEC’s time and resources service Wanneroo businesses and this allocation is likely to increase over time.

Detail

Every year, the SBDC holds its Annual General Meeting somewhere within the state of Western Australia, with delegates attending from all over the state. In 2001, it was held in Albany.

The agenda addresses small business development, dealing with small business issues, entrepreneurial approaches to growing businesses as well as how to build relationships with local government sponsors.

This year, the SBDC was looking for a pro-active local government to host this conference. Alternative venues at Fremantle, El Caballo and the Vines Resort were initially considered. After evaluating all of the above alternatives, the SBDC chose Wanneroo as its preferred location to hold this year’s conference.

As the City is hosting this conference, it is considered appropriate that it waive its usual fee for booking the facility for the 2 days of the conference.

Comment

The City of Wanneroo is developing a strong working relationship with the SBDC. In 2001/02 the SBDC awarded funding of $100,000 to employ a Small Business Trainer for the 2Cities portal project. The SBDC is also providing some funding and assistance to the City in support of the Home Based Business Night to be held on Wednesday, July 17 at the City. A continued close working relationship is expected in the future, and the conference will show delegates and the State government that Wanneroo is innovative in its approach to small business assistance and development.

The conference will also provide a significant opportunity for show casing local business within Wanneroo and will also contribute to the Wanneroo economy as delegates attend activities and functions within Wanneroo during the conference.

The commercial rate to hire the Banksia Room is $800 for two days. It is considered appropriate that the City should waive the hire charge as its contribution toward the conference.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

This request is consistent with the goal of Economic Development in the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular with the objectives to support the needs of business and develop tourism within the City.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The opportunity cost of providing the venue free of charge will be offset by the value that the conference brings to the City of Wanneroo.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council WAIVES the facilities hire charge for the use of the Banksia Room by the Small Business Development Corporation to hold its Annual General Meeting and Conference from October 13 –15, 2002.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Other Matters

PD11-07/02 Disposal Of Part Of Reserve 38260 Compass Circle, Yanchep.

File Ref: 05112

File Name: HADisofP.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 13 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 13 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the disposal of part of a Crown reserve which is not required for its designated purpose of public recreation.

Background

Public Recreation Reserve 38260, was created by subdivision under s20A of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928, and is vested in the control of the City (refer Attachments 1 and 2). The reserve is comprised of two separate parts. One part, of approximately 740 square metres is situated in Hornpipe Court and contains a major water main. It is otherwise vacant and undeveloped. The other part comprises approximately 630 square metres and is situated in Compass Circle. This part is undeveloped and not required for either recreation or public utility purposes.

The disposal of the second part has been in contention since October 1991 and has been considered by Council on several occasions. The history of the matter is detailed in Report W364-11/00, which is appended to this report as Attachment 3.

Detail

Mrs. M Dunnet is a joint owner of Lot 830 Compass Circle, which adjoins the reserve on the north side, and a shareholder in Gemrock Holdings Pty. Ltd. which owns Lot 603 on the south side of the reserve. She has attempted since 1991 to purchase the reserve land by private treaty at a price that is substantially lower than its market value.

In September 2000, the Department of Land Administration (DOLA), advised Council that the Valuer Generals Office (VGO) had assessed the then current value of the reserve land at between $50,000 and $55,000. Council considered this valuation at its meeting held on 28 November 2000 (item W364-11/00) and resolved to:

1. Authorise the disposal of the part of Reserve 38260 situated in Compass Circle, Yanchep by public tender in accordance with s3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995.

2. Offer part Reserve 38260 for disposal on the basis that it has potential as a stand alone lot, which is capable of residential development.

3. Accept a valuation of not more than $55,000 for the purpose of establishing the 5% value to be retained by the State upon disposal of the land.

Mrs Dunnet was advised of this resolution by letter dated 1 December 2000.

Mrs. Dunnet then made a submission to the Minister for Lands, who directed that the issue was to be referred back to the then Ministry for Planning and the Health Department, for confirmation that the reserve was capable of development as a stand alone lot. In September 2001, DOLA advised the City that the responses from the Ministry for Planning and the Health Department, confirming that the reserve could be treated as a stand alone lot had been received. However, because of the time that had elapsed it was now necessary to obtain a revised valuation for the reserve land. The revised valuation took an inordinate time to obtain, and was not advised to the City until 28 May 2002.

Following the DOLA advice of September 2001, the City received a submission made by a consultant on behalf of Mrs. Dunnet, advising that she was now willing to acquire the reserve land at its fair market value in order to amalgamate it with the two adjoining lots.

Comment

Because of the difficulties experienced in getting any agreement on a purchase price from Mrs Dunnet over a long period of time and in order to provide the opportunity for the City to gain maximum return for the community on the sale of the land, it is recommended that Council maintains its position to dispose of the land by public tender.

The valuation advice received from DOLA in May 2002, put the current value of the land at $65,000. DOLA advised that it is prepared to sell the reserve land to the City at the price of $3,250.00 plus GST, which represents 5% of the valuation figure normally retained by DOLA. This will then enable the City to on-sell the land to a third party. Upon acceptance and payment of the sale price by the City, DOLA will make arrangements to transfer the reserve land in freehold to the City.

Prior to the sale of the reserve land the City will need to arrange for the land to be rezoned from Parks and Recreation Reserve to Residential to reflect its intended future purpose. This rezoning is one of the items that will be included in an omnibus amendment to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2, which is currently being prepared.

Statutory Compliance

A local government may dispose of property by either auction, public tender or private treaty. If it proposes to dispose of property by private treaty the local government must give public notice of the intention and invite submissions from interested parties. In the notice it must give details of all parties concerned, the consideration to be received and the market value as determined by valuation within the last 6 months.

Strategic Implications

This proposal is considered to be consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan in terms of both providing and managing infrastructure to meet the needs of, and lifestyle opportunities for, our community.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Disposal of the reserve land by public tender will ensure that Council disposes of an asset at its true value under an open market conditions. Under DOLA’s guidelines, proceeds from the sale of reserves must be set aside for the purchase of new reserves or constructing capital improvements on existing reserves.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. AUTHORISES payment of a purchase price of $3,250.00 plus GST to the Crown for the acquisition in freehold of the part of Reserve 38260 in Compass Circle, Yanchep.

2. OFFERS the part of Reserve 38260 in Compass Circle, Yanchep for sale by public tender as a stand alone freehold lot following registration of the land in the name of the City and the finalisation of appropriate rezoning procedures.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD12-07/02 Resumption Of Land For Rocca Way Road Reserve, Wanneroo

File Ref: 05074

File Name: HAResofL.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by sb Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the resumption of land for the future road reserve of Rocca Way in the Wanneroo Town Centre.

Background

The redevelopment of the Wanneroo Town Centre has been ongoing since 1998, and included amongst other things, a land exchange between the City and the owner of Lot 507 (the Wanneroo Shopping Centre site), in order to provide a development site adjacent to Dundebar Road and to facilitate the construction of a public road (Rocca Way) to connect Dundebar Road with Conlan Avenue.

The land exchange was the subject of a Deed between the City and the owners of Lot 507. The land that has been agreed to be exchanged is shown on the Land Exchange Plan at Attachment 1.

The land exchange was planned to be in two stages. Settlement of the first stage took place on 22 March 2002. The second stage will be triggered by the owners of Lot 507 making an application to redevelop the shopping centre.

The proposed Rocca Way road reserve was also planned to be created out of Lot 507 in two stages, and was intended to be surrendered to the Crown at the time of each of the land exchanges. The surrender of the road land to the Crown however, was dependent on the surrender of existing access easements that are held separately in favour of the owners of Lots 63 and 64 Conlan Avenue.

The owners of Lot 63 (the Commonwealth Bank site) signed a surrender of easement document, however the owners of Lot 64 (the old National Bank site) refused to sign a surrender document for the easement they hold.

Detail

Several attempts were made by Council’s solicitors to obtain the surrender of the easement from the owners of Lot 64 at a reasonable consideration. These attempts failed and the owners continued to demand a consideration that cannot be reasonably justified.

A road falls within the definition of a public work for the purposes of the resumption (compulsory taking) provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997. The Act empowers the Minister for Lands to resume land for a public work on behalf of a local government.

Comment

The dedication and construction of Rocca Way, ultimately between Dundebar Road and Conlan Avenue is one of the main principles of the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan. Given the position of the owners of Lot 64, the resumption of the Rocca Way land is the only means by which Rocca Way can be reasonably dedicated as a public road.

The resumption of the land (which has the approval of the owner), will have the effect of extinguishing the access easement held by the owners of Lot 64 Conlan Avenue. The City’s solicitors have advised that this action cannot reasonably be seen as depriving the Lot 64 owners of any rights or entitlements because they hold their easement specifically for the purpose of maintaining access to their land. The fact that the City is acquiring the land for the purpose of a dedicated road ensures that the Lot 64 owners will continue to have uninterrupted access.

The Land Administration Act outlines the process for the taking of land for public works. In summary, this process involves the City requesting the Minister for Lands to issue a notice to the landowner/s advising of the intention to take the land. This notice includes details on the extent of land required, the purpose for the land, the date the land is required and the acquisition process. The notice is advertised in a statewide circulating newspaper. The Minister will then consider any objections to the notice and whether it is appropriate in the circumstances to grant an order to take the land. The process is likely to take in the order of six to twelve months.

Statutory Compliance

The resumption process must follow the provisions of the Land Administration Act, 1997.

Strategic Implications

The dedication of Rocca Way is one of the key principles of the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan and is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan in terms of providing and maintaining infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Because the resumption is being undertaken with the landowner’s consent in accordance with the terms of the Deed of Agreement with the City, there will not be any liability for compensation against the City as they have agreed that no compensation will be payable.

The owners of Lot 64 will not be entitled to compensation as they are not deprived of the rights secured by the easement.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. AUTHORISES procedures being commenced for the taking of land with the agreement of the owners under the provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997, in respect to part of the land required for Rocca Way, Wanneroo being the land comprised in Lot 9000 and part of Lot 507 on Deposited Plan 29475;

2. AUTHORISES a request being made to the Minister for Lands for Lot 9000 and part of Lot 507 to be dedicated as a public road; and

3. INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands, as required by s56 of the Land Administration Act 1997, against any claim for compensation equal to the amount of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the Minister in considering and granting the request for dedication.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD13-07/02 Unauthorised Land Use: Lot 7 (219) Mary Street

File Ref: 09970

File Name: HAUnaLan.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Y. Heath Date 20 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Y. Heath Date 20 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Consideration of an extension of time to allow relocation of an unauthorised manufacturing business.

Background

In April 2002, the City investigated a rural property in Mary Street, Wanneroo, and observed metal roof trusses stored on the lot. An investigation later revealed the trusses were being manufactured in a large shed on the lot.

A report was presented to Council at its 21 May, 2002 meeting where the matter was referred back to administration to further investigate.

Detail

The subject land is zoned “Rural Resources” under District Planning Scheme No 2 where manufacturing processes fall within the definition of “general industry” or ‘light industry”. Both definitions are “X” uses, which are not permitted uses, for that zoning.

As the City has no discretion to consider such a use, a notice to discontinue the business within 14 days was issued by the City. The lot owner subsequently contacted the City and requested a non-conforming use right for a period of 12 months as he claimed not to have been aware of the planning requirements.

Comment

Manufacturing is a use that is not permitted in a Rural Resource zone.

Once the City is made aware of any illegal activities it is obliged to take the necessary action to bring about compliance. The City generally endeavours to do this within a timeframe which is considered to be reasonable, recognising that in almost all circumstances, negotiation ensues over an extended period. This period would ordinarily take up to 3 months.

The applicant’s request for a non-conforming use could not be considered as it did not qualify as such under the City’s District Planning Scheme. As the City had not received any further request in writing indicating the owner’s relocation plans, timing needs, etc, a report was submitted to the 21 May, 2002 Council meeting requesting the owner to cease operating within 3 months and relocate from the lot.

Further Information

Confirmation has now been received via a letter from the owner dated 18 June, 2002 wherein he advises that he will be purchasing a new property and requests an extension of his relocation to 6 months. As suggested above, where owners work with administration toward a satisfactory outcome and provide details of their relocation plans and timing needs, administration endeavours to be reasonable in its response to such matters. In view of this and given the owner has now provided details of his relocation to the City, it is recommended that Council support an extension of time to provide six months for the activity to cease operating from this site.

Statutory Compliance

The current manufacturing activity being conducted on the subject lot is illegal under DPS No 2 and therefore must be discontinued.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ADVISES the owner that his request for an extension of time to cease operating has been extended for a period of 6 months within which time the current activity must cease operating and he must relocate from the lot.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Technical Services

Tenders

TS01-07/02 Tender 02247 - The Supply And Delivery Of One Full Forward Control Truck With Front Load Compactor And Trade/Outright Purchase Of One Existing Mitsubishi Front Load Refuse Truck

File Ref: S02247T

File Name: AATen022.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendation of Tender 02247 – The Supply and Delivery of One Full Forward Control Truck with Front Load Compactor and Trade/Outright Purchase of One Existing Mitsubishi Front Load Refuse Truck.

Background

The City’s front load refuse compactor, plant number 97546, was purchased in June 1994 and is used by the Environmental Waste Services Business Unit to collect refuse from commercial premises.

The City’s Trade, Industrial and Commercial Plant Replacement Programme recognises that the optimum replacement time for front load refuse compactors is seven years. On this basis provision was made in the 2001/2002 Trade, Industrial and Commercial Plant Replacement Programme to replace plant number 97546.

Detail

Tender 02247 was advertised on 13 April 2002 and closed on 30 April 2002.

The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Manager Building and Fleet Maintenance Services, Fleet Maintenance Team Leader, Manager Environmental Waste Services, EWS Works Coordinator, Transport Officer and the City’s Fleet Consultant, has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following assessment criteria as detailed in the tender document.

· Whole of life cost inclusive of price for the vehicle offered and trade in price

· Operational assessment and;

· Mechanical assessment.

There were two tenders received for the supply and delivery of one full forward control truck with three options for a front load compactor and trade of the City’s existing truck and two tenders for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck.

There were also two tenders received for the supply of compactor bodies however these were included in the two tenders for the supply of truck and compactor and have not been considered separately.

The following table details the purchase and trade prices offered by each tenderer.

Tenderer	Vehicle Offered	Purchase Price	Trade Price	Net Changeover
Skipper Trucks	Acco K2350/285 MJE 27m³	$302,940	$40,000	$262,940
Skipper Trucks	Acco K2350/285 MJE 33m³	$306,631	$40,000	$266,631
Skipper Trucks	Acco K2350/285 Wastemaster 30m³	$295,210	$40,000	$255,210
Skipper Trucks	Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 27m³	$329,470	$40,000	$289,470
Skipper Trucks	Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 33m³	$333,161	$40,000	$293,161
Skipper Trucks	Mitsubishi FS27S2W Wastemaster 30m³	$321,740	$40,000	$281,740
Kelair Holdings Pty Ltd	Outright purchase of existing truck		$72,000
Bus and Truck Brokers WA	Outright purchase of existing truck		$5,010

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender against the established criteria and reported as follows:-

1. Whole of life costing inclusive of price for the vehicle offered and trade in price.

The Iveco Acco K2350/285 with a Wastemaster 30m³ compactor body was assessed as having the lowest whole of life cost. This criterion represents 65% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each tender received for the supply of a truck and compactor body.

Tender	Score
Acco K2350/285 Wastemaster 30m³	65.00
Acco K2350/285 MJE 33m³	63.52
Acco K2350/285 MJE 27m³	62.60
Mitsubishi FS27S2W Wastemaster 30m³	58.69
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 33m³	57.34
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 27m³	56.37

There were two tenders received for the outright purchase of the City’s existing commercial refuse truck. The tender of Kelair Holdings Pty Ltd offered the highest purchase price. This price ($72,000) also exceeded all of the trade in prices offered.

2. Operational assessment.

The City currently operates commercial refuse trucks with both Acco K2350/285 and Mitsubishi FS27S2W cab/chassis. Both have proved capable operationally and are considered equally suitable.

The bodies offered fall into two design categories, the MacDonald Johnston 27m³ sides are of ribbed design whereas the MacDonald Johnston 33m³ and the Wastemaster 30m³ bodies have smooth sides. The ribbed design is considered more durable and easier to maintain. If damage is sustained on the side of the body a ribbed design allows replacement of individual panels between the ribs whereas a smooth design may require the replacement of a whole side panel. This is an advantage where the refuse being collected is from an industrial area, as the risk of an object piercing the body is increased.

The MacDonald Johnston 27m³ scored best in the operational assessment. This criterion represents 25% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each tender received for the supply of a truck and compactor body.

Tender	Score
Acco K2350/285 MJE 27m³	24.15
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 27m³	24.15
Acco K2350/285 Wastemaster 30m³	17.50
Mitsubishi FS27S2W Wastemaster 30m³	17.50
Acco K2350/285 MJE 33m³	17.50
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 33m³	17.50

1. Mechanical assessment.

The mechanical assessment was based on ease of servicing and safety checks, quality of components, parts availability and dealer support. The Acco K2350/285 with MacDonald Johnston 27m³ and 33m³ bodies scored best in the mechanical assessment. This criterion represents 10% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each tender received for the supply of a truck and compactor body.

Tender	Score
Acco K2350/285 MJE 27m³	4.05
Acco K2350/285 MJE 33m³	4.05
Acco K2350/285 Wastemaster 30m³	3.77
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 27m³	3.55
Mitsubishi FS27S2W MJE 33m³	3.55
Mitsubishi FS27S2W Wastemaster 30m³	3.44

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender against the established criteria. The overall rankings of the tenders based on the weighted score is:

Rank	Tender	Weighted Score
1	Skipper Trucks – Acco K2350/285 with MJE 27m³ body	94.85
2	Skipper Trucks – Acco K2350/285 with Wastemaster 30m³ body	90.04
3	Skipper Trucks – Acco K2350/285 with MJE 33m³ body	89.12
4	Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi FS27S2W with MJE 27m³ body	87.62
5	Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FS27S2W with Wastemaster 30m³ body	83.08
6	Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FS27S2W with MJE 33m³ body	81.94

Comment

Based on the overall ranking of the tenders it is recommended that the tender from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of one Acco K2350/285 with a MacDonald Johnston 27m³ front loading compactor body be accepted. It is also recommended that the tender from Kelair Holdings Pty Ltd for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck, plant number 97546, be accepted.

The Fleet Management Steering Committee has reviewed this report and supports the recommendations.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Costs associated with accepting the recommended tenders are compared to budget in the following table:

Tender					Budget
Supplier Vehicle Description	Trade Plant #	Council Price	Trade	Changeover	Gross	Trade	Total	Budget Variance	Delivery
Skipper Trucks
Iveco Acco K2350G/285	97546	$302,940							14-16 weeks
MJE 27m³ Compactor

Kelair Holdings Pty Ltd
Outright purchase of trade			$72,000	$230,940	$315,000	$80,000	$235,000	$4,060

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ACCEPTS Tender No 02247 from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of one Acco K2350/285 cab chassis fitted with a MacDonald Johnston 27m³ front loading compactor body for the price of $302,940.

2. ACCEPTS Tender No 02247 from Kelair Holdings Pty Ltd for the outright purchase of the trade truck, plant number 97546, for the sum of $72,000.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

TS02-07/02 Tender 02246 - The Supply And Delivery Of One 9 Tonne Tip Truck And Trade/Outright Purchase Of One Existing Mitsubishi Tip Truck

File Ref: S02246T

File Name: AATen046.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendation of Tender 02246 – The Supply and Delivery of One 9 Tonne Tip Truck and Trade/Outright Purchase of One Existing Mitsubishi Tip Truck.

Background

The City’s 9 tonne tip truck, plant number 96691 was purchased in February 1996 and is used by the Operational Services Business Unit to support the roles of both the Engineering and Parks sub units. It is required to carry gravel, sand, timber, and general green waste and to tow a trailer loaded with a skid steer loader.

The Heavy Vehicle Replacement Programme recognises that the optimum replacement time for 9 tonne trucks is six years. On this basis provision was made in the City’s 2001/2002 Heavy Vehicle Replacement Programme to replace plant number 96691.

Detail

Tender 02246 was advertised on 13 April 2002 and closed on 30 April 2002.

The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Operations Engineer, Engineering Construction Supervisor, Fleet Maintenance Team Leader, Transport Officer and the City’s Fleet Consultant, has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following assessment criteria as detailed in the tender document.

· Whole of life costs inclusive of price for the vehicle offered and trade in price

· Operational assessment; and

· Mechanical assessment.

There were four tenders received for the supply and delivery of one nine tonne tip truck with trade of the City’s existing truck and four tenders for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck.

The following table details the purchase and trade prices offered by each tender.

Tenderer	Vehicle Offered	Purchase Price	Trade Price	Net Changeover
Skipper Trucks	Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC	$96,700	$44,270	$52,430
W.A. Hino	Hino Ranger 9	$95,161	$40,000	$55,161
W.A. Hino	Hino Ranger 10	$102,701	$40,000	$62,701
Major Motors	Isuzu FVR950 Medium	$121,300	$42,727	$78,573
Total Waste Disposal	Outright Purchase of Trade		$47,500
Bus & Truck Brokers WA	Outright Purchase of Trade		$46,990
Raytone Motors	Outright Purchase of Trade		$44,351
Smith Broughton & Sons	Outright Purchase of Trade		$55,277

Skipper Trucks also offered an option of a FM658HV truck with a compliance plate of May 2001 at a discount of $6,630. Investigation indicates that the difference in resale value between a 2002 compliance truck and 2001 compliance makes this option uneconomical and it is not recommended.

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tender for the supply and delivery of one nine tonne tip truck against the established criteria and reported as follows: -

1. Whole of life cost inclusive of price for the vehicle offered and trade in prices.

The Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC was assessed as having the lowest whole of life costs. This criterion represents 65% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each tender.

Tender	Score
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC	65.00
W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 9	64.46
W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 10	56.64
Major Motors – Isuzu FVR950 Medium	42.11

There were four tenders received for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck. The tender of Smith Broughton & Sons offered the highest purchase price. This price ($55,277) also exceeded all of the trade in prices offered.

2. Operational assessment.

The City currently has similar trucks to those offered in its fleet and all have proved equally capable of performing the required tasks.

3. Mechanical assessment.

Again all trucks are considered equal in terms of mechanical assessment with no major issues being reported with the trucks currently in the City’s fleet.

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each of the tenders for supply and delivery of one nine tonne tip truck against the stated criteria. The overall rankings of the tenders based on a weighted score is: -

Rank	Tender	Weighted Score
1	Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC	100.00
2	W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 9	99.46
3	W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 10	91.64
4	Major Motors – Isuzu FVR950 Medium	77.11

Comment

Based on the overall ranking of the tenders it is recommended that the tender from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of one Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC be accepted. It is also recommended that the tender from Smith Broughton & Sons for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck, plant number 96691 be accepted.

Accepting the tenders from Skipper Trucks and Smith Broughton & Sons will result in an over budget expenditure of $5,923. This has resulted from a higher than anticipated purchase price. The over budget expenditure can be funded from the Heavy Vehicle Replacement Reserve as a result of savings made in previous tenders.

The Fleet Management Steering Committee has reviewed this report and supports the recommendations.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Costs associated with accepting the recommended tenders are compared to budget in the following table. The over budget expenditure can be funded from the Heavy Vehicle Replacement Reserve due to savings made in previous tenders.

Tender					Budget
Supplier Vehicle Description	Trade Plant #	Council Price	Trade	Changeover	Gross	Trade	Total	Budget Variance	Delivery
Skipper Trucks	96691
Mitsubishi Fighter 10		$96,700							Ex stock
FM658HRFAC

Smith Broughton & Sons
Outright purchase of trade			$55,277	$41,423	$84,000	$48,500	$35,500	-$5,923

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ACCEPTS Tender No 02246 from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of one Mitsubishi FM658HRFAC nine tonne tip truck for the sum of $96,700.

2. ACCEPTS Tender No 02246 from Smith Broughton & Sons for the outright purchase of the City’s existing truck, plant number 96691 for the sum of $55,277.

3. APPROVES the budget shortfall of $5,923 be funded from the Heavy Vehicle Replacement Reserve.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

TS03-07/02 Tender 02248 - The Supply And Delivery Of Two Mini Rear Loading Compactor Refuse Trucks And Trade/Outright Purchase Of Three Existing Isuzu Rear Loading Mini Refuse Trucks

File Ref: S02248T

File Name: AATen048.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendation of Tender 02248 – The Supply and Delivery of Two Mini Rear Loading Compactor Refuse Trucks and Trade/Outright Purchase of Three Existing Isuzu Rear Loading Mini Refuse Trucks.

Background

The City’s rear loading mini refuse trucks, plant numbers 95752, 95753 and 96692 were purchased in October 1998, November 1998 and December 1996 respectively and are used by the Environmental Waste Services Business Unit to undertake the collection of street litter from bins, trade waste from 240 litre mobile garbage bins (MGB’s), and missed services (being the collection of domestic rubbish bins unable to be collected on the scheduled service day).

Plant numbers 95752 and 95753 are considered part of the light vehicle fleet while plant number 96692 being a higher capacity cab chassis is considered a heavy vehicle. The City’s Light Vehicle Replacement Programme recognises that the optimum replacement time for mini refuse trucks is 3 years and the Heavy Vehicle Replacement Programme recognises the optimum replacement time is 5 years. On this basis, provision was made in the City’s 2001/2002 Light Vehicle Replacement Programme and the 2001/2002 Heavy Vehicle Replacement Programme to replace these three trucks with two larger 10m³ rear loading refuse trucks.

Detail

Tender 02248 was advertised on 13 April 2002 and closed on 30 April 2002.

· Whole of life cost inclusive of price offered for the vehicles and trade in prices

· Operational assessment; and

· Mechanical assessment.

There were five tenders received for the supply and delivery of two mini refuse trucks and trade of the City’s three existing trucks, one tender for the supply of compactor bodies only and two tenders for the outright purchase of the City’s three existing trucks. The tender from MacDonald Johnston to supply compactor bodies only, formed part of the five tenders to supply two mini refuse compactors and is therefore not considered separately.

The City’s specification required that the cab chassis offered should be of sufficient capacity to give a payload of 4 tonnes. Only two of the five tenders submitted are capable of meeting this criterion. The remaining three tenders are considered non-conforming and are therefore not included in the assessment of tenders.

The following table details the purchase price offered by each conforming tender.

Tenderer	Vehicle Offered	Purchase Price	Trade Price	Net Changeover
Skipper Trucks	Mitsubishi FK618	$341,360	$90,550	$250,810
WA Hino	Hino Ranger 8	$318,420	$70,227	$248,193
Bus and Truck Brokers WA	Outright purchase of trades		$80,824
Raytone Motors	Outright purchase of trades		$60,763

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender for the supply of two mini refuse compactors against the established criteria and reported as follows: -

1. Whole of life cost inclusive of price for the vehicles offered and trade in prices.

The Hino Ranger 8 was assessed as having the lowest whole of life costs. This criterion represents 65% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each conforming tender.

Tender	Score
W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 8	65.00
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FK618	64.84

2. Operational assessment.

Both conforming tenders offered the same compactor body manufactured by MacDonald Johnston. The City has various MacDonald Johnston compactors in its fleet and the body offered is acceptable. The operational assessment was therefore based on the cab/chassis offered and considered such things as turning circle, driver access and controls and instruments. This criterion represents 25% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each conforming tender.

Tender	Score
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FK618	23.30
W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 8	21.65

3. Mechanical assessment.

Again the mechanical assessment was based on the cab/chassis component, as the body offered was the same for both tenders. Points considered included weekly safety checks, servicing, parts availability and dealer support. This criterion represents 10% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each conforming tender.

Tender	Score
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FK618	7.13
W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 8	6.00

The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender against the established criteria. The overall rankings of the tenders based on a weighted score is:

Rank	Tender	Weighted Score
1	Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FK618	95.26
2	W.A. Hino – Hino Ranger 8	92.65

Comment

Based on the overall ranking of tenders it is recommended that the tender from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of two Mitsubishi FK618 cab/chassis with MacDonald Johnston 10m³ rear loading compactor bodies be accepted on the basis of trading the City’s existing trucks, plant numbers 95752, 95753 and 96692 for a net changeover price of $250,810.

Accepting the tender from Skipper Trucks will result in an over budget expenditure of $62,810. This has resulted from the requirement of a higher capacity cab/chassis than was anticipated during budget deliberation. The original cab chassis suggested for budgeting purposes by the supplier will not carry the 4 tonne payload that the compactor body will hold. It is not acceptable for Council to operate overloaded trucks. The specification for the cab chassis was developed to meet legal load requirements. The Manager Environmental Waste Services has advised that funds are available in the Commercial Refuse Reserve to fund the shortfall.

The Fleet Management Steering Committee has reviewed this report and supports the recommendations.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Costs associated with accepting the recommended tender are compared to budget in the following table. The over budget expenditure can be funded from the Commercial Refuse Reserve.

Tender					Budget
Supplier Vehicle Description	Trade Plant #	Council Price	Trade	Changeover	Gross	Trade	Total	Budget Variance	Delivery
Skipper Trucks	95752	$170,680	$27,270	$143,410	$134,000	$23,000	$111,000	-$32,410	Ex stock plus
Mitsubishi FK618LHRRFAC	95753	$170,680	$37,820	$132,860	$134,000	$30,000	$104,000	-$28,860	body build
	96692		$25,460			$27,000	$27,000	-$1,540

Total		$341,360	$90,550	$250,810	$268,000	$80,000	$188,000	-$62,810

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ACCEPTS Tender No 02248 from Skipper Trucks for the supply and delivery of two Mitsubishi FK618 cab/chassis fitted with MacDonald Johnston 10m³ rear load compactor bodies and the trade of three existing trucks, plant numbers 95752, 95753 and 96692 for the net changeover price of $250,810.

2. APPROVES the budget shortfall of $62,810 be funded from the Commercial Refuse Reserve.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

LR01-07/02 Construction of the Extension of Hepburn and Mirrabooka Avenues

(As circulated separately)

Traffic Management

TS04-07/02 City Of Wanneroo Local Area Bicycle Plan

File Ref: 18861

File Name: BACirofW.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 20 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan brindal Date 27 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To advise of the outcome of the review of current local area bicycle plan and to endorse the City of Wanneroo Local Area Bicycle Plan (June 2002).

Background

Council, at its meeting on 25 September 2001 (Report TS15-09/01refers) approved funding from Transport WA and matched the amount (on a dollar for dollar basis) for the review and preparation of a new local area bicycle plan.

The current local area bicycle plan was prepared in July 1999. Several key strategies were identified and this plan detailed measures to make cycling safer and more convenient. The rapid growth within the City’s boundaries and the incorporation of an integrated transport system in the planning stages of the City have supported the need for this review.

The aim of the new plan is to provide clear direction on the types and level of provision for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM) were commissioned to update the City of Wanneroo Local Area Bicycle Plan (LABP) and identify cycling potential in the existing areas of Wanneroo, Carramar, Quinns Rocks, Merriwa, Clarkson, and Two Rocks /Yanchep.

The review also needed to consider planning for newly developing areas such as Butler, Jindalee, Carramar, Banksia Grove, Madelay, Darch and Pearsall.

The six key elements required for the LABP were:

(i) The local Bicycle Route Network (Route Plan)

(ii) Schedule of works

(iii) Maintenance schedule

(iv) On going process to ensure a cycle friendly road network

(v) Encouragement of cycling

(vi) A review of the current LABP

These elements required specific consideration to :

(a) The Perth Bicycle Network (PBN) routes – routes needed to incorporate Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the PBN Network

(b) Safe routes to Schools - consideration for “off road” routes and safe crossing locations

(c) Identification of Trip attractors such as shops, Community Centres, schools, Public transport, Regional Parks, Beaches, Marinas, Scenic Lookouts etc

(d) Directional signage on preferred routes

(e) Travel demand ie consider routes that are the most convenient and safest.

(f) Analysis of Crash Statistics to determine routes that may be hazardous for cyclists

(g) End of Trip parking facilities eg “U –Bars”

Detail

Documentation prepared by SKM in support of the City’s new LABP is available in the Councillors Reading Room. The elements noted in the section above were addressed in detail within the documentation produced by SKM.

· EXISTING City of Wanneroo Cycling Environment

SKM utilised the City’s functional road hierarchy plan and the City’s footpath register in order to determine the provision for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The following outlines the various facilities within the City:

- Local Bicycle Routes – usually take place on local streets, which have low traffic volumes and provide a safe cycling environment. They are part of the PBN – Stages 1 and 2, and form the Local Bicycle Route. These routes NE1, NE4, NW1, NW4 and NE21 are identified on existing Bicycle maps.

- Exclusive Bicycle Lanes and Sealed Road – The following roads are indicated in the PBN as having either bicycle lanes or sealed shoulders either side:

- Marangaroo Drive (Callsion Way to Alexander drive)

- Hepburn Ave (Wanneroo road to Giralt Road)

- Joondalup Drive (Burns Beach to Wanneroo Road)

- Marmion Avenue (Tamala Park to Pitcairn Entrance)

- Hester Avenue (Marmion Avenue to Connolly Drive)

- Footpaths and Shared Paths - Children, aged 12 years and under, are permitted to ride their bicycles on footpaths. Therefore, footpaths form an important part of the bicycle network for children of this age. The types of paths are outlined as follows:

- Footpath

- Shared path (or dual use path)

- Public Access Way (PAW)

- Path Through Park (PTP)

For a path to be considered a shared path, it must be listed on the Shared Path Register, which is maintained by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI). Signing is required to indicate the start and end of the shared path to cyclists and pedestrians. Current City of Wanneroo policy is to construct shared paths to a width of 2.1m with wider paths provided on more major routes and for recreational purposes.

A recent the review of existing footpaths indicates that there are a number of paths which are wide enough (between 2.0m and 4.0m) to be designated shared paths but are not currently included in the register. These sections of path would require signing to indicate the shared path status.

- Regional Recreational Paths (RRPs) - are facilities serving mainly recreational (but where direct, also commuter) purposes along the coastline, river foreshores or linear public open space corridors. These locations attract recreational users due to their scenic nature and the flat grades found along the waterfront.

Within the City a RRP is located along the coastline and partly on the southern section of the eastern side of Lake Joondalup in Yellagonga Regional Park

- Principal Shared Paths (PSPs) - are facilities serving mainly regional (but also local) needs along suburban rail reserves and freeways. The PSP is a high standard shared path with some grade-separated crossings. It primarily serves regional commuter trips, though it also serves many local destinations along the way. PSPs are considered to offer a high level of safety due to their high design standards and separation from motor vehicle traffic.

Currently there are no PSPs within the City as there are no constructed rail or freeway reserves.

· Bicycle Crash Data

Bicycle and pedestrian crash data was obtained from Main Roads WA for all reported crashes in the City for the five year period January 1996 to December 2001.

During the five-year period, there were a total of 100 (reported) incidents involving pedestrians and 82 (reported) incidents involving bicycles.

The bicycle crashes are summarised according to the vehicle types involved, as shown below:

- 71 car/bicycle crashes;

- 3 bicycle only crashes;

- 1 truck/bicycle or bus/bicycle crashes; and,

- 1 bicycle/pedestrian crashes

· Future City of Wanneroo Cycling Environment

A number of planned schemes will affect the future cycling environment within the City. These are briefly listed below:

- Strategic Transport Planning proposals:

- Proposed extension of the Mitchell Freeway to Clarkson and Butler is unknown and is currently dependent on the remaining sections being completed within Joondalup

- Proposed Extension of the Northern Suburbs Rail Line from Currambine to Clarkson. This is due for completion by 2004. It is unlikely that a PSP can be provided until the freeway is constructed. The requirements for secondary routes which lead from the PSP to local destinations should be identified so that they can be included in the future plans.

- Greenways

“Greenways are defined as a linkage connecting and encompassing conservation areas and landscape features and having conservation, recreation, urban planning and or aesthetic values.”

Examples of Strategic Greenways within the City include:

- Gnangara Regional Open Space and Wetland

- Old Yanchep Road Linking Lake Pinjar- Yanchep National Park

- Proposed Local Road Improvements

A number of traffic reports relating to local area traffic management proposals and road improvements have already been considered by the City and were reviewed to identify which proposals impact on the bicycle and pedestrian provision in the City.

- Wanneroo Road Traffic Management Study

The “Wanneroo Road – Ocean Reef Road to Pinjar Road Traffic Management Study” undertaken by GHD Consultants on behalf of Main Roads WA in May 2001 identified the need for improvements to pedestrian, people with disabilities and cyclist facilities along this major route.

Consultation

Community consultation was undertaken in two stages. The first stage involved a questionnaire seeking input from the community. The Bicycle Plan questionnaire was developed and available from the City’s website between 26 March and 30 April 2002. A reply paid address was set up to receive community contributions.

The questionnaire was also available from the following locations:

- City of Wanneroo libraries;

- Local high schools in City of Wanneroo and also Ballajura High School (Swan) and Warwick High School(Joondalup);

- All Local recreation centres;

- City of Wanneroo Civic Centre; and,

- Kingsway, Wanneroo and Clarkson shopping Centres.

An advertisement was placed in the Wanneroo Times on 2 April 2002 to advise of the review of the LABP and invite comment. An advertisement was also inserted in the City’s SmartClubs Newsletter.

The following cyclist groups were contacted to invite contributions from local cyclists using facilities within the City:

- Bicycle Transportation Alliance

- WA Cycling Club

- Northern Districts Cycling Club

The second stage involved holding a community forum in the style of a drop in session at the City’s Civic Centre on 9 May 2002 from 3pm to 7pm. The forum was advertised in the Wanneroo Community Times on 7 May 2002 and a flyer with a copy of the advertisement was emailed and posted to all questionnaire respondents who provided contact details. It was also inserted in the Clipboard. This allowed members of the community to come in and comment on a set of draft proposals for the LABP.

The forum included a display of the draft proposals for the LABP and a set of plans indicating the locations, which are considered to be dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists. These plans also denoted the location and type of crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists in the City over the past 5 years.

A poster was created to show some of the comments received from the questionnaires and was displayed at the forum. Representatives from the City and SKM were available to discuss the proposals and invite further comment.

Key Outcomes Arising from the Consultation Phase

A total of 37 submissions were received including 32 completed questionnaires and 5 written submissions. A further three responses were received at the community forum.

All respondents indicated that they would like to receive further information on cycling issues from the City. The following is a summary of the key comments received:

- Dangerous locations for cyclists and pedestrians

Locations considered dangerous by respondents are as follows:

- Wanneroo Road (highest ranking);

- Alexander Drive;

- Marangaroo Road;

- Kingsway Road;

- Marmion Avenue;

- Elliot Road;

- Lenore Road; and,

- Mirrabooka Drive.

- Locations for new cycle and pedestrian facilities

Locations where new bicycle paths/ facilities are desired:

- Safe cycling on Wanneroo Road;

- Route through Yellagonga Regional Park (includes responses relating to route around
Lake Joondalup);

- Route linking Yanchep to Two Rocks; and,

- Safe cycling to Kingsway College, Kingsway Road.

- Bicycle Parking

Suggestions for locations for the provision of bicycle parking include:

- Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks;

- Yanchep National Park;

- Wanneroo Shopping Centre

- Wanneroo Markets; and,

- As a requirement at - Transport Stations, Parks, Shopping Centres, Schools, Places of Work and Sporting Centres

- General Comments

General comments included:

- Lack of cycleways;

- No maintenance of paths – broken glass is a problem; and,

- No provision for commuter cyclists.

Comment

The new City of Wanneroo LABP covers the following recommendations:

1. Asset Register and Maintenance Programme

SKM verified the recommendations for improvements from the previous LABP. This included proposed cycling facilities and a series of spot improvements. It was subsequently found that a number of proposals have not been implemented. Subsequently SKM recommend the two following items would be of significant benefit to continuing the development of a safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle network in the City:

- Infrastructure Asset Register and Management

The compilation of all bicycle and pedestrian associated assets in an Infrastructure Asset Register would allows the City to review what additional provision is required. This forms an integral part of ensuring maintenance of all assets and is currently being developed by City Administration.

- Maintenance Programme

A maintenance programme is required to attend to those items requiring immediate attention. The benefits of such a programme would include early identification of hazards and, by maintaining the facilities, avoid creating potential hazards such as reduced visibility caused by uncontrolled vegetation growth.

2. Proposed Routes and Bicycle Provision

The proposed routes and bicycle provision for the future LABP is based on an assessment of the existing and future cycling environment and the existing and future land uses. These include:

- Schools and other educational centres

There are approximately 35 schools within the City of Wanneroo.

- Shopping and commercial areas

Major shopping areas include Kingsway and Wanneroo Shopping Centres

- Beaches

Beach facilities are provided in many locations along the coast line including Quinns Rocks and Yanchep

- Community facilities (such as libraries)

Includes libraries, senior citizens centres, youth centres and skate parks

- Sporting facilities

Includes Wanneroo golf courses and the Kingsway Sporting Complex

- Recreation areas

Includes facilities such as Lake Joondalup Park and Butler-Merriwa Recreation

- Regional facilities

Includes Yellagonga Regional Park, Neerabup and Gnangara Regional Parks

- Employment centres

Includes City of Wanneroo offices, Dundebar Road and Industrial Areas

- Transport facilities (train stations)

Includes the future Clarkson Train Station

2.1 Footpaths and Shared Paths

It is recommended that following the completion of the footpath register in those suburbs not yet surveyed, a similar exercise is undertaken to identify shared paths not shown on the PBN and also, any footpaths less than 1.5m or PAW’s less than 2.0m wide. The locations where it is recommended that shared paths be constructed is covered in the report and will be listed in future budgets for consideration by Council.

The wide variety of shared path users and potential for conflict between these users (particularly around recreational areas) must be acknowledged. In order to minimise this conflict, it is recommended that signage be installed on all shared paths, encouraging cyclists to give an audible warning on approach to pedestrians. Centre line marking should be provided on the busier shared paths to encourage path users to keep left.

2.2 Regional Recreational Paths (RRPs)

As stated earlier in this report, there are regional recreational paths in Yellagonga Regional Park and along the ocean foreshore.

Community consultation highlighted the desire for more recreational paths particularly a complete route around Lake Joondalup and connecting the existing ocean foreshore paths.

The City is currently negotiating with landowners for land acquisition in the area south of Tyne Crescent. This will allow the extension of the RRP in Yellagonga Regional Park to Ocean Reef Road. The RRP, with a contribution from the Department of Conservation and Land Management, has been funded by the City up to a point just beyond Church Street. The section from Church Street to Neville Drive is included in the 2002/2003 funding programme and the section from Neville Drive to Wallawa Street is included in the 2003/2004 funding programme.

Ultimately, it is proposed that the path is extended northwards to Joondalup Drive with the potential to link to the path on the western side of the Lake in the City of Joondalup.

Many respondents to the questionnaire were not aware of these proposals. Therefore, it is suggested that appropriate signing be installed at either end of the existing path through Yellagonga Regional Park to inform the local community of the future proposals to extend the shared path.

Given the regional status of the park, it is also recommended that there is a strong marketing initiative to promote the proposed route and facilities.

The development of the foreshore area will form part of the Foreshore Management Plan, which has recognised the need for pedestrian and cycling facilities. However, it is considered that there is merit in providing information to the local community to make them aware of such proposals.

SKM in their review of recreational facilities within the City boundaries proposed that consideration be given to a future RRP around Lake Gnangara. This would link to the proposed extension of the Local Bicycle Route NE21.

2.3 Bicycle Parking

The lack of provision of bicycle parking throughout the City was raised as an issue through the consultation. This is a constraint to people wishing to cycle and therefore, the provision of bicycle parking is likely to result in more trips being made by bicycle.

Currently, it is not known where all the existing bicycle parking and the type of parking is located within the City. From surveys and site inspections of particular locations, it was found that most of the bicycle parking facilities are of the inverse “U” rail type and are painted white or left as steel frames. Some of these are in need of maintenance, which includes re-painting and sweeping of sand and debris.

Bicycle parking facilities can only be installed within public spaces and at City owned facilities (libraries, Civic Centres, parks etc), however, it is recognised that there are many privately owned facilities where bicycle parking should be provided.

SKM recommend that the City develop a program to encourage private landowners and business proprietors to provide bicycle parking on private property in accordance with the provision of the City’s Town Planning Scheme. As bicycles are vulnerable to theft and parking, guidelines on parking should highlight that facilities need to be located in areas where they are under public surveillance.

2.4 Signage

Following discussions with Main Roads WA and the DPI, it is understood that Main Roads WA provides the signing for the Local Bicycle Routes. However, following installation of the signs, it is then the responsibility of the relevant local government to audit and maintain these signs.

It is therefore recommended that City add the Local Bicycle Routes signs to its Infrastructure Asset Register and undertake an audit of the signs every two years.

2.5 On Road Bicycle Lanes/Sealed Shoulders and Wide Kerbside Lanes

It was found that a number of busy roads within the City have 1.0m wide sealed shoulders. With a preferred width of 1.2m, it is considered that the 1.0m provision is an absolute minimum width for cyclists.

However, given that these sealed shoulders are existing, it is recommended that where the standard is sufficient, an application is made to Main Roads WA for the painted bicycle logo to be installed in the sealed shoulders.

In cases where the edges of the sealed shoulders are not of an appropriate standard, it is recommended that maintenance is undertaken prior to the application of the bicycle logos. The following table identifies such locations within the City:

Location	Provision	Comment
Marmion Avenue	Painted bicycle logos
Yanchep Road	Painted bicycle logos	Maintenance required to road edges
Lenore Road	Painted bicycle logos	Maintenance required to road edges – wider sealed shoulders to be provided when road is constructed to dual carriageway
Elliot Road	Painted bicycle logos	Maintenance required to road edges – wider sealed shoulders to be provided when road is constructed to dual carriageway

There are no recommendations for wide kerbside lanes to be provided in the City. However, it is recommended that for any maintenance, future upgrading or widening of roads within the City, consideration be given to the inclusion of on-road cycling facilities (i.e., wide kerbside lane or marked bicycle lanes).

2.6 Public Access Ways (PAWs)

Many PAWs provide useful links and short cuts for pedestrians and cyclists, often improving the connectivity in cul-de-sacs and disconnected street systems.

The City has received complaints about the misuse of PAWs and associated vandalism in the past, and as such number of PAWs have been closed.

However, the value of PAW’s, as part of the pedestrian and cyclist network should not be underestimated. Prior to any PAW closure, the value of the short cut to land uses such as schools, shops, bicycle routes or bus stops should be determined.

3. Schedule of Works

Items identified by the public during the consultation period, in addition to items identified by SKM during numerous site investigations are incorporated into the Schedule of Works. The proposed work schedule, including cost estimates and priorities has been detailed in the SKM report.

4. Safe Routes to Schools

City Administration strongly recommends that all schools establish a RoadWise Committee.

One of the outcomes of establishing a Roadwise Committee is that a Safe Routes to Schools programme can be implemented. Generally, Shared Paths around the perimeter of schools is provided to accommodate the programme and insure the safety of child pedestrians and cyclists. The Liveable Neighbourhoods notions of deeming that “on-road” cycling facilities provided a suitable cycling environment for primary school children is not supported in terms of safety.

It is therefore recommended that the continuing promotion of Roadwise and Safe Routes to Schools is actively progressed. Additionally, schools with Roadwise committees in place are to be encouraged to discuss all issues relating to pedestrian, cycle activities and road safety with the City.

The summary of recommendations and an outline of further recommendations to ensure that the City’s aim to provide and create a cycle friendly road network is outlined on Attachment 1.

Statutory Compliance

The Disabilities Act and the Discrimination Act need to be complied with for those who are mobility impaired. Regulations 132 and 169 of the Traffic Code 2000 refer to the use of Bicycle Lanes and to “Stopping on a Carriageway with a Bicycle Parking Sign”. Part 15, Regulations 211 to 229 relate to additional provisions for bicycle users such as the correct use of shared paths and separated footpaths, and riding in a bicycle lane. Regulation 253, (d), (e), (f) and (h) relate to who is permitted to cycle on a footpath and/or shared path.

Strategic Implications

The preparation and implementation of a Local Area Bicycle Plan is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular with the following objectives:

· Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport networks

· Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community

· Provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning

The City’s Town Planning Scheme No. 2 reflects the need for bicycle parking and end of trip facilities (Clause 4.16). These provisions need to be pursued as part of the development process to ensure private landowners and business proprietors provide bicycle parking on private property.

Policy Implications

Accept and promote the new City of Wanneroo Local Area Bicycle Plan as the Policy document for the City for future planning, for current implementation, asset registration and maintenance.

Financial Implications

Recommended Spot Improvements may be undertaken through the City’s maintenance programme and newly identified works need to be listed on the City’s Draft Four Year Capital Works Footpath and Bicycle Facilities Programme.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ADOPTS the recommendations of the City of Wanneroo Local Area Bicycle Plan (June 2002) prepared by Traffic Engineering Consultants, Sinclair Knight Merz and summarised on Attachment 1 to this report.

2. REQUESTS Main Roads WA to undertake linemarking and/or signage of existing Shared Paths and to undertake painted bicycle logos on the sealed shoulders of Marangaroo Drive, Hepburn Ave, Joondalup Drive, Marmion Ave and Hester Ave.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1, P 1

7 Summary of Recommendations

The key recommendations of the Local Area Bicycle Plan are detailed in Section 6 of this report.

The following is a summary of those recommendations and an outline of further recommendations to ensure that the City of Wanneroo’s aim to provide and create a cycle friendly road network is achieved:

7.1 Key Recommendations for Local Area Bicycle Plan

Asset Register and Management

Assessment of Existing Facilities

Assess requirements for reflective tape on grab rails;

Assess wheelchair access around grab rails and modify as required (following priority listing);

Undertake assessment of provision of bicycle parking and signing;

Assess existing PAW’s less than 2.0m to determine if they can be widened; and,

Ensure signing for “No Through Road” is supplemented by “Bicycles Excepted “signing;

Assess major intersections to ensure provision of grab rails.

Maintenance

Adopt maintenance programme for pedestrian and cycling facilities including footpaths, Shared Paths and bicycle parking;

Conduct audits of the kerb ramps when registering footpath widths or during standard maintenance;

Undertake remedial actions as part of the maintenance programme and any works identified from the above assessments of existing facilities;

Undertake maintenance of sealed shoulders; and,

Maintain Public Access Ways as they are vital links in the pedestrian and cyclist

network.

Funding

Obtain funding for a program for the implementation of Shared Paths;

Apply to Main Roads WA for signing of existing and proposed Shared Paths and lining for busier routes;

Apply to Main Roads WA for application of painted bicycle logos in sealed shoulders with absolute minimum width of 1.0m;

Continue to secure funding from State Government for Regional facilities – this is supported by the Local Area Bicycle Plan as a result of the review of pedestrian and cyclist needs and the responses received from the community consultation;

Consideration for future regional recreational path around Lake Gnangara; and,

Apply for funding for bicycle parking facilities.

ATTACHMENT 1, P 2

Education and Promotion of the need for cycling facilities

As part of promoting walking and cycling, in conjunction with Main Roads WA and DPI, provide education on use of Shared Paths to the local community.

Provide signing at appropriate locations on existing regional paths to inform local community of future proposals; and/ or,

Promotion of existing and future proposals for extending existing regional facilities;

Encourage public and private organisations (including retailers) to provide cycle parking at their premises for staff and visitors (through development application conditions and Town Planning Scheme);

Generic Improvements and Future Works

Ensure all new provision of kerb ramps and grab rails are designed and constructed in accordance with “best practice”;

Provide quality cycle parking at educational and leisure facilities, shopping centres and all council facilities;

Ensure through the planning process that the needs of cyclists are incorporated into new developments and redevelopments (end of trip facilities for staff and visitors);

City of Wanneroo Town Planning Scheme be amended to incorporate the bicycle parking requirements; and,

Consideration for sealed shoulders (1.2m minimum) and or wide kerbside lanes in all future road maintenance, upgrades or new road construction.

7.2 Further recommendations for the City of Wanneroo

7.2.1 Review the Local Area Bicycle Plan regularly

The bicycle plan requires regular review and updates; this should occur at least every 3 years, or at the completion of Stage 2 of the Perth Bicycle Network. To facilitate an efficient future method of review, it is recommended that accurate construction and maintenance records be kept.

This would be aided by the creation and management of Asset Register and Maintenance Programme.

7.2.2 Consideration of the requirements of cyclists when new subdivisions or redevelopments are assessed

Part of the scope of works for this study was to review the known structure plans and make recommendations as to appropriate future routes and facilities.

It is important that as part of any development application, the proposals reflect the future plans for cyclists and pedestrians of that sub-division or development area. Conversely, the proposals should be assessed to ensure that they do not impede the future pedestrian and cycling environment.

It is strongly recommended that the “best practice” for pedestrian and cycling provision as outlined in this report be adopted for any future scheme. This will ensure consistency in the type and level of provision being constructed and also avoid the expense of “fixing up” mistakes later on.

ATTACHMENT 1, P 3

7.2.3 Safe Routes to Schools

City of Wanneroo strongly recommend that all schools establish a RoadWise Committee.

One of the outcomes of establishing a RoadWise committee is that a Safe Routes to Schools programme can be implemented.

It is therefore recommended that the continuing promotion of RoadWise and Safe Routes to Schools is actively progressed. Additionally, schools with RoadWise committees in place are to be encouraged to discuss all issues relating to pedestrian and cycle activities and road safety with the City of Wanneroo.

7.2.4 Consideration of the needs of cyclists and potential bicycle facilities before the modification of any roads within the City of Wanneroo

Any proposals for new roads or upgrades of existing roads should be considered to ensure that cyclists needs are catered for. As a minimal requirement, the width of any new or upgraded road should allow 1.2m for sealed shoulders.

The provision of cycling facilities at the time of construction is obviously less expensive than retro-fitting at a later date.

The needs of cyclists require to be considered when undertaking any road modifications as part of local area traffic management including installation of traffic calming devices and upgrading of intersection treatments.

7.2.5 Promotion of Cycling in the City of Wanneroo

In addition to creating cycle friendly infrastructure, a sustained campaign of promotion and supporting activities is necessary to create a culture where cycling is seen as a normal rather than an unusual way to travel.

The following strategies are recommended to encourage cycling within the City of Wanneroo:

· Maintain contact with those involved with the community consultation for the Local Area Bicycle Plan and ensure on-going consultation between council planning and engineering officers and bicycle user groups (BUGS) and other stakeholders. This is important to ensure the plan is properly implemented;

· The nomination of a Council contact officer, responsible for monitoring implementation progress;

· Cyclist education within schools to create a pro-bike culture within school and among parents;

· A process where faults or dangerous locations can be reported to the Council (via either a phone “hotline”, the City of Wanneroo website or hazard report cards);

· All trip attractors including Council owned facilities, education centres and local businesses should be encouraged to provide appropriate end of trip facilities (showers, change rooms, secure bicycle parking) for staff;

· Cyclist information should be available at local government offices, libraries, and other community facilities to encourage residents to consider cycling. This information should include bicycle maps and health information;

· Collaborate with the Department for Planning and Infrastructure to organise some promotional events as part of the annual BikeWeek;

· Support a sustained program or targeted, complementary publicity and encouragement to publicise cycle networks and facilities, and to emphasise the health, financial and environmental benefits of cycling.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

TS05-07/02 Coldstream Circuit And Baltimore Parade, Merriwa – Median Island Traffic Treatment

File Ref: 62695

File Name: BAColCir.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by jan Date 27 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by jan Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the results of the traffic surveys and recommendation for the installation of a median island treatment in Baltimore Parade, Merriwa.

Background

Recently residents from the household on the corner of Coldstream Circuit and Baltimore Parade, Merriwa contacted the City to outline what they believed was a “hazardous road with bad design”.

The residents indicated that vehicles had crashed through his fence three times with the last occasion being on Good Friday, 2002. Primarily the crashes occur when motorists enter Coldstream Circuit from Baltimore Parade and “take the corner too fast”.

Detail

The results of traffic and speed studies undertaken in Baltimore Parade and Coldstream Circuit are summarised below:

LOCATION	Traffic Volumes	85^TH Percentile Speed	Mean Speed	Traffic Count pre 2002	85^TH Percentile Speed Pre 2002
Coldstream Cir– north of Abba Place				214vpd	57km/h
Coldstream Cir– north of Sandon Elbow	506vpd	53km/h	44km/h	804vpd	59km/h
Coldstream Cir– south of Nerang Mews	945vpd	56km/h	48km/h	548vpd	56km/h
Baltimore Parade – North of Hester Ave	3675 vpd	62km/h	52km/h	3742vpd	66km/h
Baltimore Parade – South of Jenolan Way	2837 vpd	63km/h	53km/h	2710vpd	65km/h
Baltimore Parade – North of Greyhound Drive	2554 vpd	56km/h	48km/h	3383vpd	57km/h
Baltimore Parade – South of Greyhound Drive	2348 vpd	60km/h	50km/h	2828vpd	66km/h
Baltimore Parade – North of Coldstream Cir	1997 vpd	57km/h	42km/h	589vpd	57km/h
Baltimore Parade – South of Dalvik Ave	2181 vpd	61km/h	53km/h	1610vpd	61km/h

With reference to the above table, the 85^th Percentile speeds and the mean speed recorded for both Coldstream Circuit and Baltimore Parade are consistent. However since the introduction of the 50km/h suburban speed limit, some of the speeds in Baltimore Parade are excessive and Police attention is supported.

Traffic volumes on Coldstream Circuit and Baltimore Parade are consistent with the function of the road in that connectivity is provided to the residences in all the cul-de-sacs off Coldstream Circuit and the access roads of Baltimore Parade. Coldstream Circuit is a loop road and only services the residents that live in those roads. Through traffic is not significant, as vehicular access is also provided via Yass Way and Jenolan Way to the Shops.

Crash history for Baltimore Parade has been obtained from Main Roads WA. There are no recorded crashes at the intersection. This indicates that that those vehicles which crashed into the fence on the corner of Coldstream Circuit and Baltimore Parade have not been reported to the Police.

Refer to Attachment 1 for a summary of the crash history for Baltimore Parade.

Comment

The Structure Plan for Seagrove Estate Stages 8,9 and 10 indicates that traffic forecast figures to the year 2021 for Baltimore Parade, south of the proposed Lukin Drive intersection will be 2,840vpd, and Seagrove Boulevard will be 2250vpd. In the interim and until Connolly Drive is constructed, there will be increased traffic on Baltimore Parade for a considerable number of years.

Baltimore Parade is a 10m wide Local Distributor road. Based on the geometry of the road and the consistent speed of 60km/h (which the road was originally designed for) it is anticipated that this road will tend to maintain similar traffic speeds.

The crashes in the fence that have occurred at the intersection of Coldstream Circuit and Baltimore Parade are typical of motorists driving too fast around the corner. This can be remedied by constructing islands at the intersection.

However, rather than construct islands in isolation at the above mentioned intersection it is recommended that a median island treatment be constructed for the existing length of Baltimore Parade in order to address the compliance of 50km/h for the built up area. Land development further north (as per the Structure Plan) should ensure that any new section of Baltimore Parade is constructed in a similar manner.

A firm proposal and associated budget costing is not known at this point in time. A concept design will be undertaken by City Administration before this project is presented for funding consideration by Council.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

This proposal to install a central median treatment in Baltimore Parade is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular with the objectives to “Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network” and to “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

A concept plan and associated cost estimate have not been prepared, however, the inclusion of a median island treatment for Baltimore Parade from Hester Avenue to Dalvik Avenue for future funding consideration by Council in the City’s Four Year Capital Works Traffic Management Program is supported.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. LISTS for consideration in the City’s Four Year Capital Works Traffic Management Program the construction of a median island treatment for Baltimore Parade from Hester Avenue to Dalvik Avenue.

2. ENSURE Baltimore Parade, north of its existing extent, is constructed with a median island treatment as part of future land development.

3. ADVISE the residents on the corner of Coldstram Circuit and Baltimore Parade of Council’s decision.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Infrastructure

TS06-07/02 Burt Street Drainage Sump Design And Investigation, Quinns Rocks

File Ref: 64718

File Name: EABURSTR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by jan brindal Date 17 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by nb Date 30 May 2002

Level 3 Approval by Dennis Blair Date 28 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Rob Korenhof Date 28 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Jhosie Moyle Date 28 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider options for the proposed pumping solution for stormwater volume in excess of the capacity of the Burt Street Drainage Sump.

Background

Council at its meeting on 5 February 2002 resolved to appoint Airey Ryan and Hill (Consultant Engineers) to design the proposed pumping solution for stormwater volume in excess of the capacity of the Burt Street sump and to investigate upgrade requirements for the Quinns Road sump.

Design drawings and associated documentation have now been received for approval by the City.

Refer to location plan Attachment 1.

Detail

Burt Street Pump Station

The sump upgrade, retaining wall, pump station and associated drainage works have been designed based on the investigation and recommendation for the upgrade of this sump prepared for the City by PPK Environment and Infrastructure and approved by Council on 18 December 2001. During the design process Airey Ryan and Hill suggested that a feasible alternative to pumping the excess water from Burt Street sump to Quinns Road sump would be to pump it to a location to the west of the Burt Street/Quinns Road intersection and then allow to flow into the existing drainage located near the Quinns Road/Ocean Drive intersection. This would alleviate the immediate need to enlarge the Quinns Road sump to cater for the Burt Street overflow. It was subsequently agreed by City Administration that this option be further investigated and designed as a variation to the consultancy.

It is noted that as part of the recommendations of the JDA Consultant Hydrologists report titled “Quinns Rocks Stormwater Drainage Catchment Study” endorsed by Council on 3 July 2001, new drainage would be installed from the outlet near the Quinns Road/Ocean Drive intersection eastwards along Quinns Road towards Burt Street, as part of the upgrade works. This catchment was listed third in priority for upgrading and is programmed in the City’s Four Year Capital Works Program budget for consideration in 2003/2004 and following completion of Water Corporation sewer works.

The two options for pumped discharge of the Burt Street overflow are as follows:

Pumped Discharge to Quinns Road Sump -

Pumping to the Quinns Road sump is estimated to cost $185,000, exclusive of the sump upgrade works which have been estimated to vary from $80,000 to $120,000 subject to which sump upgrade option is chosen. It does include approximately 70m of drainage pipework, which will serve no other purpose than gravitating the pumped overflow from Burt Street to the sump.

Pumped Discharge to Quinns Road -

Pumping to Quinns Road to a proposed temporary bubble up outlet with the discharge allowed to flow to the existing drainage system at Quinns Road/Ocean Drive, with the estimated cost of this work being $175,000. The existing drainage system at Quinns Road/Ocean Drive is to be upgraded as part of a future stage of the Quinns Rocks Drainage Catchment upgrade works.

Refer to Attachment 2 for details of each pipe alignment.

Quinns Road Sump Upgrade

The report prepared by PPK recommended “The City of Wanneroo further investigate the existing capacity, the contributing catchments, geotechnical characteristics and options for enlarging the Quinns Road sump”. This was not investigated as part of the original Quinns Rocks Stormwater Drainage Catchment Study as this sump is located outside the study area.

The existing Quinns Road sump is located in the north-eastern portion of Lot 211, Mindarie, and is bounded by Quinns Road (to the north), Seaham Way (to the east), Kinsale Drive (to the south) and the Indian Ocean foreshore (to the west).

There are currently three drainage catchment areas that discharge to the existing Quinns Road sump, they are:

· The Quinns Road catchment to the east of the existing sump, that is, the Bennett Street Subcatchment ‘Q1’ as defined in the JDA Consultant Hydrologists Report.

· The Mindarie Rise and Mindarie Keys 963 North subcatchment to the south-east of the existing sump.

· Lot 211

For the ultimate Quinns Road sump design, the discharge from the Burt Street Pump Station must also be included as an inflow volume.

From the combined storm water catchment areas the total impervious catchment discharging into the existing Quinns Road sump equates to 14.17ha in area. This calculates to a storage volume requirement for the 100 year 24 hour storm event of 18,850m³. Combined with the pumped discharge from the Burt Street sump, the total storage requirement of the Quinns Road sump equates to 21,700m³ with a minimum top water level surface area of 3,550m².

It is noted that from survey, the existing storage capacity of the Quinns Road sump has been calculated as 4,200m³. This equates to a 10 year 10 hour recurrence storm event. To date all stormwater has been contained within the site.

The following options for upgrade of the Quinns Road sump have been investigated based on the criteria described above:

Option 1 -

To achieve the required storage volume for the 100 year recurrence storm event it is suggested that a bund wall (or berm) be constructed to a height of RL 9.50AHD along the western and southern boundaries of the Water Corporation Pump Station site. The bund would be constructed having an inner impermeable core overlaid with a topsoil layer. The bund is to extend into the road verges to intersect at a similar level. The creation of the bund will allow the top water level within the sump during the 100 year 24 hour recurrence storm event to rise to the RL 9.20AHD contour to the west and south of the existing sump formation.

A new chainmesh fence would be required to be constructed along the RL 9.50AHD contour level within the Lot 211 boundaries. This will encompass the expected flood limits and provide the necessary safety requirements, due to the expected depth of water within the sump site.

The construction cost of this option would be approximately $80,000.

Option 2 -

Excavate an area of 40m x 44m with a new sump base level of RL 5.00AHD to the west of the existing Quinns Road sump. This will allow the 100 year 24 hour recurrence storm event top water level to rise to RL 8.25AHD.

A new chainmesh fence would be required to be constructed along the RL 8.50AHD contour level around the expected flood limits, due to the depth of water within the sump site.

The construction cost of this option would be approximately $120,000.

Option 3 -

Excavate the existing sump base to RL 3.00AHD to provide an additional 3,400m³ of storage to the capacity of the existing Quinns Road sump. It is expected the top water level during the 100 year 24 hour recurrence storm event would rise to RL 8.50AHD.

Due to the excavated base level of RL 3.00AHD, groundwater contamination issues may arise and will need to be further addressed.

A new chainmesh fence would be required to be constructed along the RL 8.75AHD contour level around the expected flood limits, due to the depth of water.

The construction cost of this option would be approximately $100,000.

It is noted that all three options will be impacted by Bush Forever constraints, with Option 3 being the option with least impact. Each option would also require varying areas to be fenced for safety reasons due to the depth of water to be contained for the 1:100 year storm event.

Comment

Burt Street Pump Upgrade

Both pumped discharge options (i.e. Options A and B) have been given due consideration with all aspects taken into account. Pumping with discharge to Quinns Road (i.e. Option B) is the preferred alternative.

Option A would require the further enlargement of the Quinns Road sump, whereas Option B would alleviate the need for enlargement of the Quinns Road sump and future additional pipework to drain the Burt Street overflow can be further utilised for drainage of Quinns Road.

Quinns Road Sump Upgrade

The report prepared by Airey Ryan and Hill provided three possible options for upgrading of the Quinns Road sump with the recommendation that Option 1 be further investigated.

As part of the Quinns Rock stormwater catchment study, sumps within the area were prioritised for upgrading. The Quinns Road sump upgrade will be integrated into this prioritised list with further investigation being undertaken in due course.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Implementation of stormwater drainage works meets the needs of the City’s goal relating in “Healthy Communities” and associated strategy of “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Funding of $200,000 has been incorporated in the Draft 2002/2003 Capital Works Budget (SWD201 refers) for the Burt Street Pump Station Upgrade.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. APPROVES the design drawings and documentation for the Burt Street Pump Station Upgrade, with discharge via a temporary bubble up outlet located near the Quinns Road/McPharlin Avenue intersection.

2. LIST as a high priority, an amount of $200,000 for consideration in the Draft 2002/2003 Capital Works Budget (Stormwater Discharge) for the Burt Street Pump Station Upgrade.

3. NOTES that the Airey Ryan and Hill report “Investigation of the Quinns Road Drainage Sump Upgrade (May 2002)” will be used as a reference document when further investigation/design into the upgrading of the Quinns Road Drainage Sump is undertaken.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

TS07-07/02 Policy For Landscape Upgrades To Distributor Roads And Parks

File Ref: S09/0007VO1

File Name: EAPolfor.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by jan Date 27 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 20 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 20 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

The review of Policy 7.3.2 ‘Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks”, to advise Council of recommendations for amendment to the Policy and demonstrate how the Policy is used to prioritise projects for landscape upgrades.

Background

At Council’s Ordinary meeting of 22 May 2001 (Report W176-05/01), it was resolved to advertise the Draft Policy and Implementation Plan for Upgrading Distributor Roads and Unirrigated Parks (Hames Sharley 2001) and consider the Draft Policy and Implementation Plan at a workshop. Consideration was given to the Draft Policy and Implementation Plan at Council’s Policy Forum of 23 October 2001. Council resolved at the May meeting that it:

“Notes issues not addressed in the policy include safety issues and the age of the suburb”.

At the Ordinary meeting of 27 November (Report TS09-11/01), it was resolved that Council:

1. ADOPTS the Policy and Implementation Plan for Upgrading Distributor Roads and Unirrigated Parks for the City of Wanneroo (Hames Sharley 2001), subject to :

(a) Deletion of draft recommendation 12, “That Council adopts a policy that limits irrigation of reserves to those that are over three hectares and that this policy be reviewed once all reserves over three hectares are irrigated”

(b) Inclusion of endorsed bushland assessment criteria

2. RECEIVES further reports outlining conceptual treatments, costs and programs for the development of Frangipani, Shamrock, Nannatee, Ormiston and Taywood Parks

3. REPEALS the policy ‘7.3.2 Median and Road Reserve Landscaping’ as implemented on 1 July 1999

4. ADOPTS [the policy] ‘Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks’

5. REQUESTS that the Policy be reviewed within six months from the date of implementation and a report presented to Council

Conceptual designs and costs were considered and endorsed by Council at separate meetings of 5 February 2002 (Report TS1-02/02) for Frangipani Park, and on 30 April 2002 (Report TS18-04/02) for Shamrock, Ormiston, Nannatee and Taywood Parks.

Detail

In accordance with Council’s resolutions of 5 February and 30 April, redevelopments of Frangipani, Shamrock, Nannatee and Ormiston Parks are in progress. This report primarily addresses the effectiveness of the prioritising Policy six months after implementation. In the same period the City of Wanneroo has prepared several important strategies that compliment and impact upon this policy. These Strategies facilitate other programs for passive park and distributor road development and provide guidance for apprpriate development treatments:

Strategic Plan adopted by Council at its meeting of 21 May 2002 (Report CE02-05/02)

This plan identifies five key success factors for the City to measure its performance against. These are Environment, Community, Economic Management, Development and Organisational Management. The Strategic Plan also identifies four long term goals for Environmental Sustainability, Healthy Communities, Economic Development and Corporate Management and Development.

The Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy aims to meet all of these objectives and measures by prioritising landscape developments using an endorsed criteria for assessment to ensure that :

· The social needs of the community are addressed in order of magnitude

· Natural and Cultural assets are protected and enhanced

· Infrastructure is developed and managed in an environmentally and economically sustainable manner

· Funds are allocated appropriately based on social need and the availability of resources

Strategies providing for specific long term Policy direction and Actions that are costed and timed, are being developed and reviewed to address these broader Strategic Plan outcomes.

Draft Local Environment Strategy (LES) approved by Council for issue for public comment at its meeting of 30 April 2002 (Report PD13-04/02)

The Draft LES identifies six key focus areas of Biodiversity, Enhanced Greenhouse Effect, Waste, Resource Conservation and Management, Community Participation and Environmental Awareness, and Sustainability. The LES proposes 64 prioritised Actions for the City to undertake over a period of 1 to 5 years. Of the 64 Actions, 44 are listed as ongoing or to be undertaken within the first 1-2 years. Fourteen relate to the enhancement of Biodiversity through the protection and proper management of bushland, foreshores, public open space and other landscape features.

Under other of the six key Draft LES focus areas, actions such as the development/review of the City’s Bike Plan, Trails Master Plan and Municipal Heritage Inventory are currently underway and will provide important information for identifying site specific treatments and links for road and park developments. The key focus area of Resource Conservation and Management includes Actions for water auditing, grey water and storm water reuse for landscape purposes.

All of these Draft LES Actions reinforce the intentions for environmental sustainability outlined in the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy and implementation plan, through prioritising criteria and development options.

For example LES Action 15 “Promote the use of local native plants in landscaping of private property and new development areas” has been addressed through the preparation of the City of Wanneroo’s Recommended Plant Species List issued to development proponents and City Administration. It is a schedule of species that are able to thrive without supplementary watering, with an overriding first preference to locally occurring species followed by West Australian, Australian and finally exotic species, dependant upon the specific site conditions. Having this guideline in place provides for all landscape treatments that meet several objectives related to conservation, sustainable water use, landscape character and cost effectiveness.

Proposed Strategic Infrastructure Asset Management Plan presented at Council’s Policy Forum of 26March 2002

Council considered a presentation from BSD Consultant Engineers for the preparation of a City wide Strategic Infrastructure Asset Management Plan. The brief for such a plan is based on achieving improved levels of service, value for money and risk management. The plan itself will address best practice asset life cycle management and accountability to the community.

The Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy as a tool for prioritising parks and distributor roads for development and for determining appropriate treatments, relates directly to the proposed Infrastructure Asset Management Plan. Assessments for landscape developments require the City to consider capital costs, recurrent costs, monitoring and maintenance requirements, risk reduction (health and safety) and proper resource allocation (particularly irrigation water), whilst meeting community expectations and needs.

Consultation

In order to address the Community’s needs, the City needs to involve the Community in decisions made about park and road infrastructure development. If the Community are involved, they feel a sense of ownership for the outcomes and with regard to public infrastructure in particular, they are more likely to protect it and support Council’s initiatives and decisions.

During the development and implementation phases of the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy and implementation plan, full and targeted community consultation has been facilitated through:

· Ordinary Council meeting information, recommendation and resolution

· Advertisement of the Draft Policy for comment

· Return letter surveys and public library displays of concepts for comment

· Acknowledging and responding to petitions lodged with Council

· Representative liaison between Administration, Councillors, Conservation Advisory Committee (CAC), ratepayer groups and individuals

Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy approved for issue for public consultation at the meeting of 11 June 2002 (Report CEO02-06/02)

Under this Draft Policy the proposed Community Consultation Review Panel would ratify future consultation regarding changes to the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy and specific implementation projects prior to issue. This process is subject to Council’s further consideration and endorsement of the final Community Consultation and Participation Policy.

Comment

The Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy and implementation plan was developed as a tool for City Administration to :

· Determine priorities for landscape development under community and Council endorsed criteria

· Address community requests with a rationale for these priorities

· Assist with determining appropriate asset development, with particular regard to irrigation infrastructure

· Address Council and Statutory initiatives and in particular the Ministry for Planning Infrastructure’s Liveable Neighbourhoods, Bush Forever, the City’s POS Planning Policy and Strategic Plan

An amount of $200,000 was allocated in the 2001/2002 financial year for implementing the first stage of the passive park upgrade program, comprising works at Frangipani and Shamrock Parks. An amount of $240,400 is listed in the Draft 2002/2003 Capital Works Budget for the second stage of Shamrock Park and the redevelopment of Ormiston and Nannatee Parks. Increased maintenance amounts have been included in the draft Operational Budget for each park.

If the City of Wanneroo assumes a constant rate of redevelopment works to two parks per year, the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks implementation plan will take nearly sixty years to implement. This program does not include road landscapes, any parks already under irrigation and requiring upgrades, or undeveloped public open space created in the same period.

Two options that were previously presented to Council:

· Adopt a policy for not irrigating small (under three hectares) high capital and maintenance cost parks until such time that all larger parks are developed, as originally recommended in the Draft Policy and Implementation Plan for Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Unirrigated Parks. It is noted that it was resolved to delete this recommendation from the Policy at the 27 November meeting.

· Substantially increase the allocation of capital and maintenance funds for the redevelopment of all listed parks within a shorter time frame.

The installation of irrigation, quality turf and turf mowing and weed maintenance are the major cost factors of consideration. The smaller the park, the greater duplicated infrastructure, more frequent the remobilisation from site to site, less productive smaller equipment is used and therefore the greater the costs for maintenance.

The Effectiveness of the Policy

To assist City Administration with reviewing the scheduled developments against the endorsed criteria, two Field Survey Forms have been prepared (refer to Attachments 1 and 2 of the amended policy as presented in the “Recommendation” section of this report) for park and distributor road assessments. Presenting the criteria in a “tick the box” layout allows City Administration to input the information into a spreadsheet for data sorting and comparative purposes. The Field Survey Form can be attached to the Policy, representing the Policy in application.

The Form lists all of the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary criterion listed in the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy, with the addition of a risk to safety assessment criteria discussed below. By rating each criteria between 1 and 5, a priority profile for each location can be prepared under the Primary and Secondary criterion.

The Tertiary criteria can be used to refine priorities, but is mainly used as an indication of the way in which the location should be developed.

Particular issues for discussion have resulted from public comment and Council’s consideration during the development phase of the Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks policy and provided for refinement of the Policy and its application. These issues are discussed in more detail as follows:

Does the Policy adequately take into consideration safety as a criteria for prioritising distributor road and passive park development?

Yes it does, but only for prioritising locations and not necessarily for site specific treatments.

Section 9 of the Policy and Implementation Plan considered five basic development options and the cost implications of irrigating parks of all sizes. No consideration was given to other or more detailed development options as it was understood that each site should be considered under its own merits. A wide range of health and safety standards are applied to new approval, design and maintenance proposals, which take into consideration relevant Acts, Australian Standards, State and City best practice Operational Policy. If a risk to safety or health is identified at a site and it is likely to occur and will result in severe consequences, it should be rectified immediately and not be subject to prioritising deliberation. If a risk is identified that may or may not occur and is not severe in its ramifications, then it should be managed for the short term and dealt with as part of proposed development works. Risk assessment has been included in the Primary Criteria of the Field Survey Forms as item A1.

The process for evaluating a likely risk is undertaken in accordance with the Australian Standard 4360:1999, utilising a simple matrix where the severity of the consequences is measured against the likelihood of the event occuring:

Likelihood	Consequences
Likelihood	Insignificant	Minor	Moderate	Major	Catastrophic
Almost Certain	H	H	E	E	E
Likely	M	H	H	E	E
Moderate	L	M	H	E	E
Unlikely	L	L	M	H	E
Rare	L	L	M	H	E

Legend

E: Extreme risk, immediate action required

H: High risk, senior management attention needed

M: Moderate risk, management responsibility must be specified

L: Low risk, manage by routine procedures

Does the Policy adequately take into consideration the age of the Locality for prioritising distributor road and passive park development?

Yes it does under the Secondary Criteria items B3and B4 and tertiary Criteria C5 (refer to Attachments 1 and 2 of the amended policy in the recommendation section of this report)

The Policy and Implementation Plan included Sections 7.2.3 and 7.3.5 that explored the population projections and demographics for the five Census areas within the City of Wanneroo. This information is regularly updated and refined and is available to City Administration for ‘live’ review of the priorities against the relative age, population growth and composition City wide.

The condition of the existing infrastructure assets City wide is to be a addressed through the City’s proposed Strategic Infrastructure Asset Management Plan. Infrastructure assets including bushland are currently monitored to meet minimum standards for health and safety, under a number of maintenance programs. As discussed above, the aim of a Strategic Infrastructure Asset Management Plan is to ensure optimum service to the community, best practice risk management and best practice resource management.

Does the Policy adequately take into consideration an appropriate bushland quality assessment criteria for prioritising distributor road and passive park development?

Yes it does under City Administration’s current best practice for assessment against criteria as for Bush Forever sites.

Part A of the Bush Forever document outlines seven criteria for selecting regionally significant bushland. These are accepted as appropriate principles applicable for assessment of all bushland sites:

· Representation of ecological communities

· Diversity of flora and/or fauna

· Rarity of community species

· Maintaining ecological systems

· Scientific or evolutionary importance

· Recognition under previous classification categories

· Attributes that add to the value of bushland, eg. landscape or historical values

Using the passive park site assessment criteria A6 and A7 and the distributor road criteria C5 (refer to Attachments 1 and 2 of the amended policy in the recommendation section of this report), consideration is given to any existing vegetation assessment provided in documentation such as An assessment of the conservation values of the remnant vegetation in the City of Wanneroo (Malcolm Trudgen 1996). An important tool will be the outcome of Draft LES Action item 3 to Prepare a City-wide Plan to increase Biodiversity Protection (such as a Greening Plan). This Action will provide for identifying and prioritising locally and regionally significant lineal networks for the multiple purposes of ecology, recreation, culture and aesthetics.

Does the current budget allocation adequately take into consideration the desires of the community?

Unlikely at the current rate of developing two parks per year.

As discussed above, the implementation of a program that prioritises passive park development over sixty years may seem too lengthy to some members of the community.

It is important to remember that the early stages of the program will be devoted to consideration for irrigating existing locations in established Localities. These higher priority locations emulate the intentions of initiatives such as Liveable Neighbourhoods where development of local parks and streetscapes is encouraged as part of the establishment of urban neighbourhoods.

Parks that are identified as locally significant bushland will not be considered a high priority or costly for development, as irrigation and grassing will be inappropriate.

Although such parks will require development funds for protection (fencing, paths, signs) and enhancement (rehabilitation and management), they tend to be less of a priority to a community that may be more concerned with recreational facilities and ‘groomed’ aesthetics.

The Draft LES Action for a Biodiversity protection plan as referred above, will provide for support to addition external funding applications through initiatives such as the natural heritage trust programs and community labour assistance. Therefore it is the anticipated that the ‘lower priority’ bushland locations will be ‘developed’ concurrently with the local neighbourhood urban locations. This will faciliate a much greater rate of implementation for this prioritised program. The implementation plan is to be reviewed by Administration annually to provide the best possible outcome for the program over time, responding to changing needs, resources and other priorities.

Is the Policy robust and flexible enough to meet the long term strategic objectives of the City of Wanneroo?

Yes it is. The Policy and implementation program for Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks addresses and provides for:

· Community choice and participation in decisions making

· Quality services and infrastructure

· Conservation and sustainable use of available resources

· Infrastructure economic sustainability

· Policy and process for Administration guidance

Amendments to the Policy

Changes outlined in this report are recommended for inclusion in Policy 7.2.3 for Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks, and are shown as highlighted in the revised policy document as presented in the “Recommendation” section of this report. These changes include:

· Attachment of Field Survey Forms for individual location assessment for landscape upgrades to parks and distributor roads

· Inclusion of the primary criteria for determining any immediate safety and/or health risk

· Minor and/or additional clarification of wording

Statutory Compliance

All works as a result of the implementation of this recommendation shall comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and the relevant standards under the Building Codes Australia and Australian Standards.

Strategic Implications

This recommendation meets with the City’s objectives for:

· Environmental Sustainability in conserving and enhancing our environment assets.

· Healthy Communities in providing and managing infrastructure assets to meet the needs of our community.

Policy Implications

This recommendation is an amendment to the City’s Policy 7.3.2 for ‘Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks, July 2001’

Financial Implications

Subject to Council endorsement, the financial implications relating to the implementation of the priority projects identified through application of this policy, will be subject to annual Capital Budget consideration by Council.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ADOPTS the amended Policy 7.2.3 “Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks’, including Attachment 1 ‘Landscape Upgrade Park Field Survey Form’ and Attachment 2 ‘Landscape Upgrade Distributor Road Survey Form’, as follows:

Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks

Policy Owner: Infrastructure Services

Distribution: All employees

Implementation: 2 July 2002

Scheduled Review: 1 July 2004

Objective

The objective of this policy is to :

· Guide Council and Administration in prioritising public open space and distributor roads for appropriate landscaping development, utilising an endorsed criteria for assessment.

· Guide applicants on matters Council and Administration will take into consideration when evaluating development applications and detailed engineering and landscape designs.

Statement

The City recognises its responsibility to work towards and advocate an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable community. In considering Capital and Operational Budget allocations, Administration will endeavour to:

· evaluate sites for best practice landscape asset management

· minimise the City's exposure to risk and capital and recurrent cost liabilities;

· apply a consistent approach to landscape treatments within the City of Wanneroo;

To this end the City has adopted the document Policy and Implementation Plan for Upgrading Distributor Roads and Unirrigated Parks (Hames Sharley 2001) and its recommendations:

1. Public Open Space Development Staging

The landscape development of public open space shall be listed in order of priority and reviewed annually under the following and applied to Attachment 1 Landscape Upgrade Park Field Survey Form:

Primary Criteria:

Risk to health and/or safety

Surrounding land uses

Proximity to existing irrigated reserves

Primary use

Statutory plans showing proposed development

Quality of vegetation

Natural uniqueness

Cultural uniqueness

Secondary Criteria:

Quality of existing landscape

Existing infrastructure assets

Population projections

Tertiary Criteria:

Available budgets

Council Policies

Planning Policy / Liveable Neighbourhoods

Access to irrigation water

Demographics

2. Distributor Roads Development Staging

The landscape development of distributor roads shall be listed in order of priority, reviewed annually under the following criteria and applied to Attachment 2 Landscape Upgrade Distributor Road Field Survey Form:

Primary Criteria:

Major intersections abutting regional facilities

(Refer Centres Planning Policy)

Secondary Criteria:

Identified as a regional node or focal point in the Structure Plan

Traffic count exceeding 15,000 vehicles per day

Tertiary Criteria:

Continuity of street or park scape

Extent of likelihood of disturbance

Population projections

Presence of indigenous vegetation

Quality of existing streetscape

Surrounding land uses

3. Public Open Space and Distributor Road Development Options

The development of public open space shall be in accordance with the Public Open Space Planning Policy, Landscape Enhancement Area Policy, Council Reserves and Parks Policy and the parameters of:

Health, safety, legibility and amenity

Features to be retained, enhanced and restored

Ecological sustainability

Water Corporation's Water Wise Principles

Community needs

Capital costs

Recurrent costs

Site specific development / management plans

Responsibility for Implementation

Manager, Infrastructure Services

LANDSCAPE UPGRADE – PARK FIELD SURVEY FORM ATTACHMENT 1
PARK NAME :
CRITERIA DESCRIPTION		RATING	5	4	3	2	1
A. PRIMARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE PRIORITY
A1	Risk of >moderate consequences and >moderate likelihood of occurring					YES	NO
A2	Surrounding Landuse within 800m radius		Urban	Mixed	Commercial	Industrial	Rural
A3	Other Existing Fully Developed Park within 400m radius		None	Bushland	Undeveloped	Partially Developed	Fully Developed
A4	Purpose of Park		Active Sport	Formal Community Use	Passive Recreation	Aesthetic	Conservation
A5	Other Proposed Parks within 400m radius		None	Undeveloped > 5yrs	Bushland	Partially Developed < 5yrs	Fully Developed < 5 yrs
A6	Existing Quality Vegetation Worthy of Retention		None Present	Low Quality/ Quantity	Some, eg Small Stands	Vegetation Worthy of Rehabilitation	Quality Endemic Vegetation
A7	Naturally Unique Features Contributing to BushForever & Green Planning Corridors		None	Isolated	Some Benefit in Isolation	Worthy of Integration	Identified as Integral
A8	Culturally Unique Featured Benefiting from Development		Important Building	Heritage Feature	Important Landscape	Future Restoration Works	No Identified Cultural Value
	Total Primary Criteria

B. SECONDARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE PRIORITY
B1	Is Quality of Visual Landscape Low, Unsustainable or Unattractive?				YES	NO
B2	Is there existing Infrastructure (eg. Playground) that may benefit from further development?				YES	NO
B3	Current Population of Community > 1000 ?				YES	NO
B4	Is the Estimated Population for the Locality in 2 years > 2000 ?				YES	NO
	Total Secondary Criteria
	Sub Total of Primary & Secondary Criteria
C. TERTIARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
C1	Are Capital and recurrent funds Available?				YES	NO
C2	Does it Comply with Council Policies?				YES	NO
C3	Does it comply with Planning and Infrastructure Policies?				YES	NO
C4	Is Irrigation Water Source Available?				YES	NO
C5	What is the Demographic Profile of the Locality Population?	30% < 12 Years	30% < 18 Years	30% < 29 Years	30% < 39 Years	30% < 50 Years
C6	Housing Type Profile of the Locality within 400m radius	>R40 High Density	R20 - R40 Higher Density	R20 Medium Density	<R20 Rural	Urban Deferred
	Total Tertiary Criteria
	Total of All Criteria

LANDSCAPE UPGRADE – DISTRIBUTOR ROAD FIELD SURVEY FORM ATTACHMENT 2
Distributor Road Name :
CRITERIA DESCRIPTION		RATING	2	1
A. PRIMARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE PRIORITY
A1	Risk of >moderate consequences and >moderate likelihood of occurring		YES	NO
A2	Intersection of Two Distributor Roads & Abutting Regional Facilities		YES	NO
	Total Primary Criteria
B. SECONDARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE PRIORITY
B1	Does Road Abut Proposed Future Regional Facilities ?		YES	NO
B2	Road Traffic Counts Exceed 15,000 vpd?		YES	NO
Total Secondary Criteria
	Sub Total of Primary & Secondary Criteria
C. TERTIARY CRITERIA TO DETERMINE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
C1	Proposal Forms Part of Existing Treatment Worthy of Continuation		YES	NO
C2	No Future Works that will disturb any Landscape Treatment		YES	NO
C3	Route for a Locality of Current Population > 1000		YES	NO
C4	Route for a Locality of Population > 2000 in two years		YES	NO
C5	Proposal Sympathetic with Existing Vegetation		YES	NO
C6	Proposal is Sympathetic to Existing Quality of Streetscape		YES	NO
C7	Proposal is Sympathetic to Surrounding Landuse		YES	NO
	Total Tertiary Criteria
	Total of All Criteria

2. CONSIDERS a review of Policy 7.2.3 ’Landscape Upgrades to Distributor Roads and Parks’ prior to July 2004.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Corporate Services

CS01-07/02 Warrant Of Payments - For The Period To 31 May 2002

File Ref: 19882

File Name: BAWarofP.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 19 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 19 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of May 2002, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.

Background

Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.

In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.

Detail

Funds	Vouchers	Amount
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers	24550 – 26415 50000293 – 50000328	$3,109,910.92
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account	000172 – 000174	$6,724,572.08
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme Accounts	000015 – 000021	$18,488.21

At the close of May 2002 outstanding creditors amounted to $1,191,863.75.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

The list of cheques and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of May 2002 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

Statutory Compliance

Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council RECEIVES the list of cheques drawn for the month of May 2002, as summarised and listed below:-

Funds	Vouchers	Amount
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers	24550 – 26415 50000293 – 50000328	$3,109,910.92
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account	000172 – 000174	$6,724,572.08
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme Accounts	000015 – 000021	$18,488.21

Warrant of Payments for the Month of May 2002

City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account

Cheque No		Cheque Date	Vendor Name	Amount	Details
25550		01-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	1,341.15	29 SUMMONS
25551		01-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	845.15	10 WARRANTS
25552		01-May-02	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	1,410.65	POUNDAGES, SUMMONS & WARRANTS
25553		02-May-02	MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA	275.00	ATTENDANCE AT WA DIVISION'S EFFECTIVE RESEARCH BUYING COURSE HELD 20/03/02
25554		02-May-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	169.40	MR SAAD ATIA HOME CARE SERV
25555		02-May-02	BGC TRANSPORT	46.46	LIMESTONE
25556		02-May-02	AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC PLANNING & MANAGEMENT	550.00	MEMBERSHIP FEES CORP GRADE
25557		02-May-02	HAINSWORTH PRIMARY SCHOOL	48.50	REIMBURSEMENT WESTERN POWER ACCOUNT 220102220302
25558		02-May-02	SUSAN HEAP	6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND 04/0805
25559		02-May-02	GAMES WORKSHOP AUSTRALIA	69.00	1ST QUARTER 02 TOURNAMENT PRIZES
25560		02-May-02	CARNIVAL AMUSEMENTS	1,385.00	AMUSEMENT RIDES KOONDOOLA PARK
25561		02-May-02	PRIMROSE FLORIST	160.00	WREATH- ANZAC SERVICE
25562		02-May-02	SCOTT E DAVEY	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25563		02-May-02	MICHAEL J CROWE	255.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25564		02-May-02	ALISON & D THORNCROFT	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25565		02-May-02	MICHAEL & R MCARTHUR	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25566		02-May-02	HEIDI L MELIA	250.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25567		02-May-02	STEPHANIE FEWSON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25568		02-May-02	OCEAN KEYS SHOPPING CENTRE	22.00	TRESTLE TABLE HIRE
25569		02-May-02	CAROL & JOSE ORDUNA	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25570		02-May-02	AMANDA & D RUSSELL	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25571		02-May-02	JASON STEWART	30.00	DOG REG REFUND 02/5169
25572		02-May-02	LISA BRADSHAW	57.00	DOG REG REFUND 04/1963
25573		02-May-02	LISA BALL	38.00	DOG REG REFUND 03/4790
25574		02-May-02	PENEOLOPE MURPHY	57.00	DOG REG REFUND 04/3274
25575		02-May-02	LISA PERRY	20.00	DOG REG REFUND 02/5259
25576		02-May-02	JEANETTE HINCKS	20.00	DOG REG REFUND 02/3471
25577		02-May-02	MARTIN DICKHART	20.00	DOG REG REFUND 02/5202
25578		02-May-02	HELEN BATISTE	40.00	DOG REG REFUND 02/2998 & 02/2999
25579		02-May-02	DEBORAH SCHURMANN	6.00	DOG REG REFUND 03/0882
25580		02-May-02	CLAIRE FARLEY	6.00	DOG REG REFUND 03/0118
25581		02-May-02	KIM L NEVE	3.00	DOG REG REFUND 03/3827
25582		02-May-02	FIONA HOKIN	12.00	DOG REG REFUND 04/0729
25583		02-May-02	PIANO GULLY WINES	91.54	VARIOUS WINES
25584		02-May-02	WILLIAM GROVE	1,870.00	REIMBURSEMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE
25585		02-May-02	R A A F A (WA DIVISION INC)	854.20	COUNCIL MEETING ON TOUR MERRIWA
25586		02-May-02	AARQUEanitech	226.05	BOND 2ICORE 914X50M
25587		02-May-02	B & G CHAMBERS	420.00	CATERING FOR 20 GUESTS POLICY FORUM 16/04/02
25588		02-May-02	SYME MARMION & CO	25,000.00	SERVICES FOR WEST PERTH F/BALL CLUB
25589		02-May-02	ARRB TRANSPORT RESEARCH LTD	154.00	SUBSCRIPTION FOR PUBLICATION
25590		02-May-02	BENARA NURSERIES	990.00	SCAEVOLA PAROLA FANTARE MAKE UP WITH MAUVE CLUSTERS
25591		02-May-02	BUNNINGS LIMITED	330.60	INDUSTRIAL DOOR CLOSERS RYOBI, CEMENT ADDITIVES & RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
25592		02-May-02	CONTI'S WINES	40.00	FOR TASTING VARIOUS WINES
25593		02-May-02	KEY HYDRAULICS	1,687.95	MAINTENANCE AT WANGARA RE-CYCLING PLANT
25594		02-May-02	MIRCO BROS PTY LTD	41.00	NITROPHOSKA BLUE SPECIAL 50KG BAG
25595		02-May-02	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	101,078.71	FEES ON VARIOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
25596		02-May-02	PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD	8.50	CAP SLOTTED TUFF MASTER
25597		02-May-02	RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD	9,687.70	LANDSCAPE MAINT OCT 01 TO MAR 02- WILLESPIE PARK
25598		02-May-02	SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT	604.64	FILTER OIL, HYDRAULIC FILTER & VARIOUS
25599		02-May-02	SLING RIG PTY LTD	73.70	SPANSET D1 TRADESMAN RATCHET ASSEMBLY PAC
25600		02-May-02	CADBURY SCHWEPPES	133.44	250ML 30 APPLE SV
25601		02-May-02	SILVER CHAIN	543.40	CARE AID
25602		02-May-02	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	41,625.07	AUTO OILS & DIESEL UNLEADED PETROL
25603		02-May-02	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	210.95	WANN LIBRARY, AQUAMOTION, WORKS DEPOT & CIVIC CTR MILK SUPPLY
25604		02-May-02	WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE	863.50	VARIOUS TOWING SERVICES
25605		02-May-02	AUSTRALIA POST	5.06	STD LETTERS
25606		02-May-02	AUST CONSERVATION FOUNDATION	49.00	HABITAT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
25607		02-May-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	73.05	PETTY CASH
25608		02-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	66.45	PETTY CASH
25609		02-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.00	PETTY CASH
25610		02-May-02	BELAIR SMASH REPAIRS	614.12	LABOUR/PARTS/OTHER ITEMS
25611		02-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	829.35	REPAIR BRICKPAVING ON VERGE & STREETSIDE ADVERTISING
25612		02-May-02	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	2,654.50	CITIZENSHIP CATERING & VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
25613		02-May-02	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	165.00	EUTHANASIA - 10 DOGS
25614		02-May-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	50.00	PETTY CASH
25615		02-May-02	FURNTECH WA PTY LTD	2,200.00	NEW CIVIC CENTRE DOOR & SIDE LIGHT TO CREATE OFFICE WITHIN RANGERS AREA
25616		02-May-02	GO POWER DIESEL SERVICES	211.75	TRAVEL TO CITY OF WANNEROO WORKSHOP, CONNECT COMPUTER TO TRUCK & CHECK WHICH INJECTOR NOZZLE IS MISFIRING FOUND NUMBER 3 INJECTOR FAULTY, REMOVE & REFIT NEW
25617		02-May-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	3,042.05	HACC SERVICES STH/NTH APRIL
25618		02-May-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	659.08	COURIER CHARGES
25619		02-May-02	MOVE CLOTHING & LINEN SUPPLIES	103.95	STAFF UNIFORMS- CUSTOMER SERVICE
25620		02-May-02	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	32.45	COURIER CHARGES
25621		02-May-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	1,188.00	MATERIAL AND LABOUR
25622		02-May-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	18.10	PETTY CASH
25623		02-May-02	REG BOLTON'S CIRCUS	759.00	MINDARIE FESTIVAL SUITCARE
25624		02-May-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	638.00	MAIN BROOM FML COMPLETE
25625		02-May-02	IAIN SUMMERLIN	192.50	AUDIOLOGICAL ASSESMENTS
25626		02-May-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	112.35	MOBILE LIBRARY TELEPHONE CHARGES & COMM SVCS FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
25627		02-May-02	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	43.45	P/CASH
25628		02-May-02	WATER CORPORATION	428.00	ADMIN CTR CHARGES 01/07/01 - 30/06/02
25629		02-May-02	DR C T WONG	1,700.00	APRIL IMMUNISATION CLINICS
25630		02-May-02	WESTERN POWER	4,496.45	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE & CHARGES FOR THE WANN SHOW- GROUNDS & WANN FUNCTION CTR
25631		02-May-02	WORM AFFAIR	52.80	WORM FARM
25632		02-May-02	CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY CASH	230.76	P/CASH
25633		02-May-02	PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PETTY CASH	7.25	P/CASH
25634		02-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	117.73	CR STEFFENS TRAVEL ALLOWANCE
25635		03-May-02	AMANDA ROGERS	28,009.45	PAYROLL
25636		03-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	1,519.75	18 WARRANTS
25637		03-May-02	D G CONSULTING	2,926.00	ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONTRACT STAFF
25638		06-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO OPEN PRIZE	3,000.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25639		06-May-02	PAINTING AWARD	1,000.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25640		06-May-02	WORKS ON PAPER AWARD	1,000.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25641		06-May-02	THREE DIMENSIONAL WORKS AWARD	1,000.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25642		06-May-02	SECONDARY STUDENT AWARD	500.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25643		06-May-02	TERTIARY STUDENT AWARD	500.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25644		06-May-02	BEST WANNEROO RESIDENT AWARD	500.00	ART AWARD WINNERS
25645		06-May-02	W A LOCAL GOVT SUPERANNUATION	207,921.28	APRIL 2002 SUPERANNUATION
25646		07-May-02	LYDIA S FRISINA	88.40	OVERPAYMENT ON RATES ON PROPERTY 112204
25647		07-May-02	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	11,151.26	STATIONERY SUPPLIES
25648		07-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25649		07-May-02	RECYCLING CO OF WA PTY LTD	558,493.69	PROCESSING FEES
25650		07-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	2,767.35	31 SUMMONS
25651		09-May-02	MICHAEL HAYES	50.00	KEYHOLDER WANN RD MUSEUM
25652		09-May-02	KEYSTART LOANS LTD	125.11	OVERPAYMENT RATES PROP 182752
25653		09-May-02	ROBERT ELLIOTT	146.70	REFUND EXPENSES ENVIRO CONFERENCE
25654		09-May-02	L SNAPE	270.00	PAYMENT OF HONORARIA - MAY 02
25655		09-May-02	M MUNRO	270.00	PAYMENT OF HONORARIA - MAY 02
25656		09-May-02	CABAZON PTY LTD	54.35	SUNDRY WORK ART COLLECTION
25657		09-May-02	BBC ENTERTAINMENT	440.00	HIRE "EXCLUSIVE INTERLUDE" TO PLAY AT THE OPENING NIGHT OF THE CITY OF WANNEROO ART AWARD
25658		09-May-02	LADYBIRD'S PLANT HIRE	85.80	RENTAL OF INDOOR PLANTS - APRIL
25659		09-May-02	PAUL KIRCHNER	48.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25660		09-May-02	FLEETCARE	404.43	LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET
25661		09-May-02	HERITAGE SETTLEMENTS	390.80	REFUND RATES OVERPAID PROP 194936
25662		09-May-02	MICHAEL GODFREY	21.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25663		09-May-02	CARNIVAL AMUSEMENTS	1,000.00	AMUSEMENTS & GENERATOR - MINDARIE FESTIVAL
25664		09-May-02	SIMON RUSHFORTH	40.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25665		09-May-02	ABOUT BIKE HIRE	60.00	BIKE HIRE - GOLD PROGRAMME 22/4/2
25666		09-May-02	DESERT STORM ADVENTURES	450.00	DESERT STORM ADVENTURE TOUR FOR THE GOLD PROGRAMME ON 29/4/2
25667		09-May-02	EXPRESS APPLIANCES	100.00	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
25668		09-May-02	RD GODDARD	155.01	PENSION REBATE PROP NO 110369
25669		09-May-02	MR & MRS D HILL	21.15	REFUND OF RATES PROPERTY 111578
25670		09-May-02	TRACY ANN INGLE	53.38	PENSION REBATE PROP 126048
25671		09-May-02	A & V SULLIVAN	230.64	PENSION REBATE PROP 137359
25672		09-May-02	DEBRA A SAGGERS	213.50	PENSION REFUND PROP 140881
25673		09-May-02	A & P HERBERT	99.52	PENSION REBATE PROP 152257
25674		09-May-02	DANNY L BRIEN	572.06	REFUND RATES PROP 152689
25675		09-May-02	JENNIFER & ROY WILLIAM	728.13	REFUND RATES PROP 153039
25676		09-May-02	JUTTA & MANFRED T GANZ	199.13	REFUND RATES PROP 153077
25677		09-May-02	M GRUBELICH & DE NORTH	2,964.29	REFUND RATES PROP 153124
25678		09-May-02	AUSTRALAND HOLDINGS LTD	2,384.79	REFUND PROP 153135, 152857
25679		09-May-02	A & K BARKER	159.53	PENSION REBATE PROP
25680		09-May-02	LYNDA HOCKING	335.08	REFUND RATES P/N197945
25681		09-May-02	NC HAWKINS & LM HEWETT	704.13	REFUND RATES PROP 197228
25682		09-May-02	CENTURY SETTLEMENTS	448.00	REFUND RATES PROP 197150
25683		09-May-02	L & S ALINTAS	788.62	RATES PAID TWICE 195737
25684		09-May-02	S & TJ MOONEY	165.40	PENSION REBATE PROP 189080
25685		09-May-02	AR & J HEWITT	263.71	PENSION REBATE PROP 186749
25686		09-May-02	MR MRS GA DOBSON	106.75	PENSION REBATE 183948
25687		09-May-02	DJ & EM COOPER	242.17	PENSION REBATE PROP 181707
25688		09-May-02	MR MRS JF CRABB	113.40	PENSION REBATE 177786
25689		09-May-02	AE EGGLESTON	213.50	PENSION REBATE PROP 159193
25690		09-May-02	ANNE-MARIE CRUISE	220.70	PENSION REBATE 156106
25691		09-May-02	IRENE MONAGHAN	18.00	PART REFUND COMPOST BIN
25692		09-May-02	DEIDRE WEBB	10.00	GOLD PROGRAMME
25693		09-May-02	ANNE LAN HUYNH	1,191.16	REFUND RATES OVERPAYMENT M4625
25694		09-May-02	ROBYN WOODS	33.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25695		09-May-02	MICHAEL SICA	111.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25696		09-May-02	DALE SUTHERLAND	60.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25697		09-May-02	AARON DAY & S FERGUSON	300.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25698		09-May-02	VILMA & GILES FITZGERALD	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25699		09-May-02	SHANE M HOOD	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25700		09-May-02	JOSEPHINE & JOAN GIBBON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25701		09-May-02	CLIVE & CELIA LONG	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25702		09-May-02	JOHN & MAUREEN KEADY	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25703		09-May-02	ANITA PRISCILLA PALMER	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25704		09-May-02	MARY & STUARY HAMILTON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25705		09-May-02	LYNLEY M KAY & CG GREENSLADE	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25706		09-May-02	WILLIAM & GLENVILLE LARCOMBE	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25707		09-May-02	LESLIE OWEN DEAR	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25708		09-May-02	JOAN & MALCOLM GIBBON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25709		09-May-02	LIAM CHE KIRKNESS	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25710		09-May-02	AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L	1,735.80	MAINTENANCE AT AQUAMOTION, WANN LIBRARY & CIVIC CTR & GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
25711		09-May-02	COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS	9,677.74	ADVERTISING ORDERS
25712		09-May-02	PROCESS WELDING & MAINT SVCS	286.00	RELOCATE & SETUP PLASTIC BAILER
25713		09-May-02	WILSONS SIGN SOLUTIONS	404.80	1 X ACID ETCHED PLAQUE
25714		09-May-02	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	1,413.50	LEGAL ADVICE ON RETIREMENT VILLAGES
25715		09-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	163.00	FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY INFRINGEMENTS APRIL02
25716		09-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	30.00	MISSING DOG REGO PAYMENT D GREGOR
25717		09-May-02	HOMESWEST - EAST PERTH	27,626.20	RATES REFUND- 196093, 190693, 197964, 197965, 197966, 144379, 144380, 198273, 198052, 183266, 155830
25718		09-May-02	STORK ELECTRICAL	36,022.72	INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS HIGHCLERE
25719		09-May-02	LEONIE HELEN MORGAN	330.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25720		09-May-02	CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD	417.15	FULLVUE FILES
25721		09-May-02	FUCHS LUBRICANTS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD	55.95	TITAN GEAR RX 80 20LT PACK
25722		09-May-02	KOMATSU AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	1,717.50	SEALS, BRUSHES AND PINS
25723		09-May-02	KEY HYDRAULICS	1,506.45	ENGINEERING REPAIRS @ MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY - MOTIVATION DR, WANGARA
25724		09-May-02	LULLFITZ	57.75	42 ASSORTED NATIVE TUBES
25725		09-May-02	MAJOR MOTORS	690.97	FRONT & REAR WHEEL CYL REPAIR KIT, FRONT & REAR WHEEL BEARING, FRONT & REAR HUB SEAL INNER & VARIOUS SUPPLY & REPAIR
25726		09-May-02	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	714.01	SITE VISIT 13/3/2 INVESTIGATE COMMS PROBLEM & REMOVE & INSTALL 2WAY RADIOS
25727		09-May-02	MCLEOD & CO	860.75	DOG RESTRICTED BREEDS REG 2002, V VAN LOON PROSECUTION & LISA MAREE BEDGOOD PARK PROSECUTION
25728		09-May-02	MEY EQUIPMENT	572.70	FUELCAP & HANDGRIP & CYLINDER SUPPLY
25729		09-May-02	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	612.00	DISPOSAL OF SMALL ANIMAL 2001-2002
25730		09-May-02	PHOTOLAND	11.95	PANAROMIC FILM PROCESSING
25731		09-May-02	WANNEROO HARDWARE	80.03	BOLT CUP GAL 19430453 & VARIOUS HARDWARE SUPPLIES
25732		09-May-02	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	412.00	PHONE DISCUSSION WITH MS FOSTER RE: DEPOT LEASE
25733		09-May-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	43.75	P/CASH
25734		09-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	63.80	P/CASH
25735		09-May-02	ALINE BRICK PAVING	4,290.00	LIMESTONE RETAINING - BRAZIER RD, YANCHEP
25736		09-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.00	P/CASH
25737		09-May-02	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY	5,982.00	UNDERPAYMENT LEVY PAYMENTS MARCH 02
25738		09-May-02	RICHARD BROWN PRODUCTIONS	400.00	HIP HOP WORKSHOP @ HAINSWORTH REC CTR ON 22 & 24/4/2
25739		09-May-02	F CAMPBELL	80.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25740		09-May-02	CLEAN SWEEP	885.50	VARIOUS SWEEPING, DEMOB
25741		09-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	17,338.66	RATES REVENUES
25742		09-May-02	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	234.40	P/CASH
25743		09-May-02	D & M LAUNDRY SERVICE	244.81	LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR APRIL
25744		09-May-02	DEPT OF INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY-CAMS	115.50	TRANS CHARGES FOR WAFASTPAY - FEB & MAR 02
25745		09-May-02	ELECTRIC STOVEMAN	96.09	URN CLEANER - SERVICE CALL - LABOUR
25746		09-May-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	142.65	P/CASH
25747		09-May-02	GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA	1,568.01	GRAFFITI REMOVALS
25748		09-May-02	ALAN GREEN	25.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25749		09-May-02	JOONDALUP PHOTO-DESIGN	1,423.00	PHOTOGRAPHY - STRATEGIC PLANNING REPORT ON 18/4 AND 24/4
25750		09-May-02	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	8,766.82	CONTRACT STAFF
25751		09-May-02	LABELWORLD	634.15	PRINTED CLEAR LABELS 5,000
25752		09-May-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	179.29	COURIER CHARGES
25753		09-May-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	1,034.00	MAKE & FIT POSTS FOR SIGNS AND FIX TOOL BOX, MAKE NEW GREASE LINE COVERS, REPAIR FLOOR, BOWL & PADDLE
25754		09-May-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	101.75	P/CASH
25755		09-May-02	RANGERS SERVICES PETTY CASH	284.65	P/CASH
25756		09-May-02	MARION REEVES	155.70	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
25757		09-May-02	STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS	25,041.50	COMPACTOR TRUCK, BOBCAT WITH FORKS & LOADER HIRE
25758		09-May-02	SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD	2,612.50	PODIATRY SERVICES MARCH 25 TO APRIL 12 2002
25759		09-May-02	TECHNICAL OPERATIONS PETTY CASH	348.75	P/CASH
25760		09-May-02	WANNEROO PLUMBING	2,062.51	REPAIR WATER MAIN, REPLACE SPINDLES TO TAP, MOVING WATER LINES & VARIOUS PLUMBING WORKS
25761		09-May-02	WATER CORPORATION	11,176.65	RELOCATE AIR VALVE IN WATER MAIN AT THE JUNCTION OF HAINSWORTH AVENUE AND BEACH ROAD, GIRRAWHEEN
25762		09-May-02	WESTERN POWER	113,874.45	UPGRADE OF STREET LIGHTS AT HAINSWORTH AVE., STREET LIGHTS, CHARGES ON VARIOUS PARKS, CENTRES & OFFICES & COMM SERVICES FINANCIAL SUPPORT
25763		09-May-02	WORM AFFAIR	52.80	WORM FARM
25764		09-May-02	WESTERN STUDIO PRODUCTIONS	55.00	EYE ON PERTH BUDGET SEGMENT
25765		09-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	2,468.10	28 SUMMONS
25766		09-May-02	ALINTA GAS	390.70	HUDSON PARK TOILET/CHANGEROOMS 02/01/02 TO 04/04/02 & COMM SERVICES FINANCIAL SUPPORT
25767		09-May-02	D G CONSULTING	2,633.40	ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONTRACT STAFF
25768		10-May-02	FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES AUTHORITY OF W A	165.00	CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES
25769		10-May-02	DEPARTMENT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	318.00	ONLINE SEARCHES
25770		13-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	902.55	11 WARRANTS
25771		16-May-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	172.98	SAAD ATIA CLIENT NAME
25772		16-May-02	WANNEROO CARAVAN PARK	140.00	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL SUPPORT
25773		16-May-02	JAN SIMPSON SETTLEMENTS	260.21	OVERPAYMENT RATES PROP 198404
25774		16-May-02	MINISTRY OF HOUSING	690.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25775		16-May-02	FM GRIERSON	210.87	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE APRIL
25776		16-May-02	ARCH SOFTWARE AUSTRALIA	1,498.11	CALL OUT 14JAN-02 SYSTEM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
25777		16-May-02	DON SMITH	165.00	SPEECH & ENTERTAINMENT SEMINAR
25778		16-May-02	K MART JOONDALUP	632.94	VARIOUS KITCHEN APPLIANCE & IMPLEMENTS -ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY FACILITIES
25779		16-May-02	INTRACO MANAGEMENT CONSULTING PTY LTD	1,375.00	PREPARATION DRAFT RECORD KEEPING
25780		16-May-02	SUNCITY NEWSAGENCY	80.50	NEWSPAPERS SUPPLY
25781		16-May-02	STATE REVENUE	21.04	PROP 137748 DEFERRED INTEREST
25782		16-May-02	ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES	440.00	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT ADVICE 9118
25783		16-May-02	SPECPACK PTY LTD	187.00	SPEEDSPEC EDITION 3 UPDATE 2001 EDITION2
25784		16-May-02	PETER'S COMMERCIAL KITCHENS	195.11	ATTENDED TO BOILING WATER UNIT AT THE ADMIN CTRE
25785		16-May-02	TERRY GLOVER	20.00	INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE COURSE - WANNEROO REC CTR
25786		16-May-02	SUZANNE & LEE ELBROW	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25787		16-May-02	CHARLLAN & G WOODS	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25788		16-May-02	MICHAEL TAHUA & M WARREN	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25789		16-May-02	JANNY Z YOVICH	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25790		16-May-02	ROBERT & TRACY WORGAN	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25791		16-May-02	ROBERT & J MITCHELL	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25792		16-May-02	RODNEY DUNCAN & S JOHNSTONE	275.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25793		16-May-02	ELAINE FORRESTAL	495.00	WRITING W/SHOP G/WHEEN LIBRARY
25794		16-May-02	ARTBEAT PUBLISHERS	495.00	CREATIVE WRITING W/SHOP G/WHEEN LIBRARY
25795		16-May-02	DAVID BROWNING BUILDING SERVICES	100.00	DEVELOPMENT FEE
25796		16-May-02	MILLER ILLUMINATED SIGNS	100.00	DEVELOPMENT FEE
25797		16-May-02	FRANCESCO & ELISABETH CARUSO	100.00	DEVELOPMENT FEE
25798		16-May-02	RAPI WA	30.00	R PEAKE - RAPI EVENT 17/5/02
25799		16-May-02	E HODGKINSON	260.21	PROP 198377 R/REFUND
25800		16-May-02	NEIL PEPPER	260.21	OVERPAYMENT PROP 198363
25801		16-May-02	ARIF PEZAJ	86.86	PROP NO 190094 VALUE REDUCED
25802		16-May-02	G & SE PARRY	220.00	MEET AUTHOR W/SHOP G/WHEEN LIB
25803		16-May-02	JOZEF & Z ZYGADLO	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25804		16-May-02	LEANNE & ROBERT BORBELY	325.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25805		16-May-02	JEFFREY & SHARON LYNCH	324.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25806		16-May-02	JOHN MAIN & CAROLINE PAYNE	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25807		16-May-02	JAMIE & JODEE HARVEY	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25808		16-May-02	ANDREW & JOANNE BLUNSDON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25809		16-May-02	PHILLIP ANDRE KEELAN	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
25810		16-May-02	DISASTER MANAGEMENT WA	195.00	CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES
25811		16-May-02	DEANNE CUMMINS	229.50	UNABLE TO PUT IN PROGRAM
25812		16-May-02	S BYRNE & N WESTON	297.03	PROP 198177 PROP OVERPAYMENT
25813		16-May-02	M ROUGHAN	1,104.39	PROP 197639 OVERPAID RATES
25814		16-May-02	R HAGGARTY	213.50	PROP 164595 PENSION REBATE
25815		16-May-02	B & G CHAMBERS	420.00	CATERING FOR 20 GUESTS POLICY FORUM
25816		16-May-02	CONGRESS WEST PTY LTD	1,298.00	6TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE - MATURITY MATTERS
25817		16-May-02	EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	7,406.10	PURCHASE OF TWO FLEET CARS
25818		16-May-02	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	607.75	DURMANICH, T-LABOURER R/W
25819		16-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	2,022.40	23 SUMMONS
25820		16-May-02	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	1,249.19	POUNDAGE FOR WARRANTS
25821		16-May-02	ALLMARK & ASSOCIATES	30.00	COLOP P40 SIGNATURE
25822		16-May-02	ABONNEL PUMPWORKS ENGNG	1,265.00	PUMP REPLACEMENT AT WANN REC CTR & VALVES REPLACEMENT AT YANCHEP BEACH
25823		16-May-02	BUDGET RENT A CAR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	253.64	CAR HIRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE
25824		16-May-02	COVENTRYS	3.75	LENS CLEAR SUIT 2000
25825		16-May-02	CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD	54.20	FULLVUE FILE COVER
25826		16-May-02	DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD	552.20	MAGNETIC BARS T2-6-1, BUCKLES & MAGNETIC ARROWS T2 -6-1
25827		16-May-02	BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS	620.21	BOOKS FOR THE LIBRARIES
25828		16-May-02	DESIGN SOLUTIONS (WA) PTY LTD	1,641.75	SUPPLY OF GOOLEMA PL DRAINAGE DESIGN & DRAFTING SCHEME
25829		16-May-02	DALE COMPUTING SERVICES	259.88	TRAVEL TIME ROUTER DOWNLOAD NEW SOFTWARE
25830		16-May-02	EARTHMOVING INDUSTRY TRAIN SERV	1,200.00	TRAINING & ASSESSMENT - 3 STAFF ON 10 & 11/4
25831		16-May-02	FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	2,237.40	PHOTOCOPIER RENTAL CHARGE 29/04-29/07 02
25832		16-May-02	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	6,167.74	JOINT SWIVEL/CYLINDER SEALS.PIN SLIDE BELT
25833		16-May-02	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	318.73	INSTALL 2WAY RADIO INTO ISUZU TRUCK
25834		16-May-02	MCLEOD & CO	1,863.40	SOUTHERN RD ACCESS TO BARBAGELLO RACEWAY - DEED OF LICENCE
25835		16-May-02	MAXWELL ROBINSON & PHELPS	17,303.62	APPLICATION FOR HERBICIDE
25836		16-May-02	PHOTOLAND	104.50	FRAMES- MARKETING SVCS
25837		16-May-02	SKILLED COMMUNICATIONS	1,590.00	REPLACE TELSTRA BOX & LINE - SCENIC DR
25838		16-May-02	TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS	575.74	HUNTER 120P/C SPRINKLERS
25839		16-May-02	TECHNICAL IRRIGATION IMPORTS	2,098.00	FRANGIPANI PK ANGLE W/MAGNETIC
25840		16-May-02	TRUCKLINE	595.50	RETURN SPRING H/DUTY & OIL SEALS, BELT V RIBBED & AUTOMETRIK
25841		16-May-02	WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	3,409.85	OVERHAUL OF DAMAGED CYLINDER & EQUIPMENT RENTAL
25842		16-May-02	W A ACCESS	2,301.45	OVERHAUL OF DAMAGED CYLINDER
25843		16-May-02	WASTE MASTER	34,595.00	SUPPLY STEEL BINS ROLLTOPS FRONT LIFT BINS
25844		16-May-02	AUST INST OF MANAGEMENT	1,377.50	STAFF TRAINING
25845		16-May-02	AUSTRALIA POST	1,385.28	AUST POST BILL MARCH & APRIL
25846		16-May-02	AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS	7.00	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
25847		16-May-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	89.45	P/CASH
25848		16-May-02	AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION	77.40	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
25849		16-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	58.35	P/CASH
25850		16-May-02	AUST BUSINESS TELEPHONE CO	2,095.50	LEADER 726 HANDSETS (IVORY)
25851		16-May-02	ALINE BRICK PAVING	2,145.00	ISLAND & VERGE AREA BROCKS
25852		16-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.00	P/CASH
25853		16-May-02	AUSTRALIAN OIL SEPARATORS	275.00	TRANSPORT & PROCESS 2000LTRS OF WASTE WATER PUMPED FROM PT-1340: WASH BAY WORKSHOP 2
25854		16-May-02	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	807.69	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
25855		16-May-02	BELL HEALTH	201.04	BOSSE 23/4/02 & RAFFERTY 24/4/02; SHOULDER 22,24 & 26/04/02
25856		16-May-02	ALAN BLENCOWE	2,500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE & 02-03 TELECOMM ALLOW
25857		16-May-02	CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY	258.50	UNDERSTANDING YOUR AWARDS
25858		16-May-02	C C H AUSTRALIA LIMITED	2,691.46	ADMIN WEB, PAYROLL ADMIN, HEALTH & SAFETY, HR MANAGEMENT WEB SUBSCRIPTION
25859		16-May-02	CONTENT LIVING PTY LTD	357.43	PROP 197585 OVERPAYMENT
25860		16-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO MUNI FUND	1,612.00	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
25861		16-May-02	C C I TRAINING SERVICE	14,820.06	AWARDS, SERVICES, MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIPTION
25862		16-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	5,685.40	SLA MONTHLY CHARGES, COURIER SERVICES FOR THE LIBRARIES & LOCAL STUDIES TAPES
25863		16-May-02	FRANK CVITAN	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOM ALLOWANCE
25864		16-May-02	CATHEDRAL OFFICE PRODUCTS	1,430.00	PAMPHLET HOLDERS
25865		16-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	276.99	PAYMENT RATES DEBT
25866		16-May-02	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	2,252.50	CITIZENSHIP & VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
25867		16-May-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF - MARANGAROO	10,590.80	GOLF COACHING & GREEN FEE COMMISSIONS 03-04/02
25868		16-May-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF-CARRAMAR	8,632.10	PLAYING FEES APRIL 02
25869		16-May-02	DICK SMITH ELECTRONICS	155.20	UNIDEN SM 050 H/DUTY
25870		16-May-02	ELECTRIC STOVEMAN	137.17	CHECK URN BOILER IN KITCHEN OF THE WANN REC CENTRE & REPLACE MISSING GRILL TRAY & INSERT FOR THE STOVE AT GIRRAWHEEN SCOUT HALL
25871		16-May-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	60.15	P/CASH
25872		16-May-02	GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PETTY CASH	271.95	P/CASH
25873		16-May-02	GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	871.20	ALUMIN 7" PLAIN POLE 20015
25874		16-May-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	18,634.47	PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC CLIENTS
25875		16-May-02	IINET TECHNOLOGIES	800.00	ANNUAL CHARGE EXPLORER SERVICE
25876		16-May-02	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	3,727.90	REPLACE ROOF SHEETING TO SHED AT THE DOG POUND, REPAIR FACIA & CLEAN GUTTERS AT THE GIRRAWHEEN SCOUTS HALL, GIRRAWHEEN SENIORS CITIZENS & LIBRARY, MARGARET COCKMAN PAVILIO & DEPOT
25877		16-May-02	JOONDALUP PHOTO-DESIGN	58.80	SUPPLY IMAGE ON CD WEB
25878		16-May-02	K & F CONCRETE	825.00	DIG OUT & RE ALIGN WHEEL CHAIR ACCESS TO PALOMA PK
25879		16-May-02	KATRIMAS CURTAINS	990.00	CURTAINS, TRACKS & PELMETS FOR ALEXANDER HEIGHTS DAY CTRE
25880		16-May-02	LANDSDALE PLANT FARM	187.55	LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS ROSEA 130MM
25881		16-May-02	MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL	1,201.04	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
25882		16-May-02	MIRAGE TECHNOLOGY	2,240.00	STAFF TRAINING
25883		16-May-02	MUNICIPAL INS BROKING SVCS WA	500.00	EXCESS ON MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE
25884		16-May-02	MERCURY FIRE SAFETY	3,562.65	SUPPLY, INSTALL, INSPECT & TEST FIRE SYSTEMS & ATTEND CALL OUTS
25885		16-May-02	MORRISON'S PUBLIC ADDRESS	1,210.00	AL1 PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM & STAND
25886		16-May-02	DOROTHY NEWTON	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOM ALLOWANCE
25887		16-May-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	1,320.00	LABOUR/MATERIALS
25888		16-May-02	PERTH SEWING CENTRE	1,008.00	SUPPLY BROTHER SEWING MACHINE & OVERLOCKER GIRRAWHEEN COMM CTR
25889		16-May-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	34.35	P/CASH
25890		16-May-02	REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES	28,140.08	CLEANING PERIOD 1/4/02-30/4/02
25891		16-May-02	STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS	52,454.60	WHEEL TIPPER, COMPACTOR, BOBCAT & WATER TRUCK HIRE
25892		16-May-02	STIRLING CONCRETE PTY LTD	26,307.60	INSTALL CONCRETE CROSSOVERS & FOOTPATH AT DUNDEBAR & MOORPK ROADS
25893		16-May-02	SAM SALPIETRO	3,125.00	MONTHLY, MEETING & 2002-03 TELECOM ALLOWANCE
25894		16-May-02	TARGET	495.70	VARIOUS KITCHEN ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE REPLACEMENT & UPGRADE FOR THE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS, GUMBLOSSOM & GIRRAWHEEN AGED CARE CENTRES
25895		16-May-02	TERMGUARD PERTH PTY LTD	500.01	RELOCATE MANIFOLD FM12295
25896		16-May-02	LAURA VISEE	715.00	PRINTING OF SUMMONS
25897		16-May-02	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	115.30	P/CASH
25898		16-May-02	WESTERN POWER	12,702.50	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL SUPPORT & CHARGES ON VARIOUS CTRS, PARKS & OFFICES
25899		16-May-02	WOODHEAD INTERNATIONAL	4,884.00	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEW CIVIC CTR PROJECT
25900		16-May-02	WANNEROO CENTRAL NEWSAGENCY	48.29	VARIOUS MAGAZINES
25901		16-May-02	YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE P/CASH	94.80	P/CASH
25902		17-May-02	ALMANS SPORTS REPAIRS	297.00	MESH REPAIR TO NET & NEW 7MM ROPE
25903		17-May-02	ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT	1,559.26	HIRE OF 2 TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS FOR FRANKLIN RD
25904		17-May-02	AGPARTS WAREHOUSE	185.02	AUTO AEROSOL FORTRON PARTS & BRAKE CLEANER 500GM
25905		17-May-02	A CLASS LINEMARKING SERVICE	22.00	HSE NO. @ 125 GIRRAWHEEN AVE
25906		17-May-02	AISAT INSTRUMENTS PTY LTD	116.97	REPAIRS TO SPEEDO CABLE
25907		17-May-02	BEE JAY'S DOOR SERVICE	1,253.00	SUPPLY & INSTALL DOMESTIC ROLLER DOOR & COLORBOND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ROLLER DOOR
25908		17-May-02	CURTAIN MAN	4,345.00	CURTAINS SUPPLY & INSTALL AT WANN SENIOR CITIZENS MAIN HALL & 2ROCKS RECREATION CENTRE
25909		17-May-02	DELL COMPUTERS PTY LTD	4,327.40	DELL OPTIPLEX GX240 SMALL DESKTOP WITH CD-WRITER, BEIGE KEYBOARDS.
25910		17-May-02	DYMOCKS WARWICK	926.09	BOOKS FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
25911		17-May-02	FINIRA PLASTIC MANUFACTURERS	1,870.00	ORANGE HDPE BAGES X 22
25912		17-May-02	GREEN & GOLD HIAB SERVICES	151.25	DELIVER TO HESTER AVENUE CLARKSON DRAINAGE MATERIALS
25913		17-May-02	GREENWOOD LAWN MOWERS & CHAINSAW CENTRE	1,883.20	BRUSHCUTTER & CHAINSAW
25914		17-May-02	HAWKER MOSS SURVEYORS	550.00	EXCISION OF ROCCA WY FROM DP29475
25915		17-May-02	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	1,356.98	METRE READING ON VARIOUS COW PHOTOCOPIERS & REPAIRS TO FINANCE PRINTER
25916		17-May-02	JOONDALUP CITY ROOFING	16,687.00	REPLACE GUTTERS & DOWNPIPES AT WANN RECREATION CENTRE
25917		17-May-02	METAL ARTWORK CREATIONS	12.93	STAFF METAL BADGE & MAGNETIC ATTACHMENTS
25918		17-May-02	MAXWELL ROBINSON & PHELPS	5,174.95	SUPPLY & APPLICATION OF HERBICIDE AS PER CONTRACT NO: W00147 (ITEM 4 - PUBLIC ACCESS WAYS
25919		17-May-02	PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD	64.90	CLARET KIP E/S SAFETY BOOT, SIZE 105
25920		17-May-02	P P K ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE P/L	8,360.00	INVESTIGATE LAKE JOONDALUP DRAINAGE UPGRADE OUTLETS 9 & 10
25921		17-May-02	RAY GEARY SIGNS	510.40	FABRICATE TWO SIGNS FOR YANCHEP BEACH WALL IN FRONT OF KIOSK
25922		17-May-02	ROAD AND TRAFFIC SERVICES	6,342.60	SUPPLY & INSTALL SIGNS & LINES
25923		17-May-02	RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD	3,762.00	TRANSPLANTING 57 PALMS FROM HESTER AVE TO MARMION AVE
25924		17-May-02	RUBBER TOUGH INDUSTRIES	12,622.50	COMPOSITE GUIDE POSTS
25925		17-May-02	SALMAT	618.10	DATA CONVERSION & LASER PRINT & ALEXANDER HEIGHTS KIDS CORNER
25926		17-May-02	SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ	7,150.00	WANNEROO BIKE PLAN
25927		17-May-02	SPECIALISED FORCE PTY LTD	126.50	170074 CHAINSAWBAR
25928		17-May-02	SAMSON HORIZONTAL BORING	1,553.00	HORIZONTAL BORING BUTTERWORTH AVENUE KOONDOOLA
25929		17-May-02	SUN CITY PUBLISHING	340.70	PRINT, FOLD, DISTRIBUTE 1750 NEWSLETTERS
25930		17-May-02	TELETRONICS	29.94	PANASONIC A36A BATTERY
25931		17-May-02	UNDERGROUND SERVICES AUSTRALIA	319.00	LOCATE SERVICES BELGRADE & FRANKLYN ROAD, WANNEROO
25932		17-May-02	WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE	1,278.75	METAL COVER TO AIR GRILL, BAR TO FIT ROLLER DOOR, CUT, SUPPLY & FIT STAINLESS STEELPLATE WITH SAFE EDGES, HEET TO GATE, & GALVANIZED TOILET GATES
25933		17-May-02	WANNEROO BUS COMPANY	550.00	GOLD PROGRAMME - EXCURSION TO LANCELIN
25934		17-May-02	WORK CLOBBER	88.99	SAFETY BOOTS
25935		17-May-02	CLEAN SWEEP	231.00	GNANGARA RD 17/4/2
25936		17-May-02	WANNEROO CENTRAL NEWSAGENCY	45.50	NEWSPAPERS & BOOKS FOR THE LIBRARIES
25937		17-May-02	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	20,162.45	BALANCE PBT DUE 2001/2002 YEAR
25938		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25939		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25940		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25941		17-May-02	AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L	660.00	SERVICE AT KINGSWAY FOOTBALL CLUBROOMS
25942		17-May-02	BLUE STAR OFFICE	221.71	FASTENER FILE ARNOS POLYPRONG
25943		17-May-02	BUNZL LTD	131.30	PAINT LINE MARKING BLUE
25944		17-May-02	BOC GASES	163.97	OXYGEN MEDICAL C SIZ & DRY ICE PELLETS
25945		17-May-02	BUNNINGS LIMITED	738.79	HINGES-CLIP ON X 2, PVC PIPE, FLYWIRE, BOLTS & NUTS & VARIOUS HARDWARE PRODUCTS
25946		17-May-02	BLYTH ENTERPRISES	96.80	4 SWIVEL CASTORS
25947		17-May-02	BITUMEN EMULSIONS	1,089.00	SUPPLY OF 1500 LITRES OF RS2K
25948		17-May-02	BEAUREPAIRES	38.50	PASSENGER TOE-IN ALIGNMENT
25949		17-May-02	BYWEST PTY LTD	169.84	GASKET SET STIHL 036, MOWER EDGER BLADE & TRIMLINE 500G
25950		17-May-02	BOFFINS BOOKS	104.98	VARIOUS BOOKS FOR YANCHEP/2ROCKS LIBRARIES
25951		17-May-02	J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD	301.26	VALVE GREASE CONTROL, WIRE ROPE & GREASE GUN NIPPLES MCNAUGHT KY COUPLER & GREASE GUN NIPPLES MCNAUGHT KY COUPLER
25952		17-May-02	BRAVO HIRE	88.00	HIRE OF GROUND HOG 09/04/02
25953		17-May-02	CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA	721.60	VARIOUS BATTERIES
25954		17-May-02	CASTLE TOOLS TYROLIT PTY LTD	306.90	SUPPLY & DELIVER TO WORKS DEPOT 14" COMBO BLADE
25955		17-May-02	COVENTRYS	1,522.95	CAP RADIATOR, LAMP REAR COMB, BOWL, GLOBE, CAP FILLER & VARIOUS HARDWARE ITEMS
25956		17-May-02	COVENTRYS	320.52	BELT FAN, AUTO SADDLES, SCOT SEAL PLUS, SEAL CLAMP & VARIOUS ITEMS
25957		17-May-02	CUTTING EDGES PTY LTD	239.80	SHANK
25958		17-May-02	CARABOODA ROLL ON INSTANT LAWN	702.00	SUPPLY WINDSOR GREEN ROLL ON TURF
25959		17-May-02	CITY BUSINESS MACHINES	1,203.71	CANON INKJET PRINTER, EPSON STYLUS COLOUR PRINT & PANASONIC INKJET FAX
25960		17-May-02	DIAMOND LOCK & KEY	653.70	REMOVE RDF 571 CYLINDER, REKEY DOOR, REPAIR GLASS DOOR ON DISPLAY CABINET ADD LOCK & SECURE GLASS SLIDERS
25961		17-May-02	DEMBICON AUSTRALIA	90.97	GAS CYLINDER
25962		17-May-02	EDUCATIONAL ART SUPPLIES CO	379.10	ART SUPPLIES FOR JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE
25963		17-May-02	EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD	10.00	SAFETY POLICY X 10 A4
25964		17-May-02	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	536.51	PVC PRESSURE PIPE, VALVE & VARIOUS RETICULATION SUPPLIES
25965		17-May-02	FRICTION CONTROL	195.27	BALL BEARINGS, BACK UP RING, BEARING INSERT
25966		17-May-02	FUCHS LUBRICANTS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD	3,068.56	OIL HYD AUTO CLOVIS 68,OIL TRANS AUTO ATF 4000 & OIL ENG UNILUBE TITAN UNIVERSAL HD1540
25967		17-May-02	GUARDIAN DATA	2,518.51	ADAPTEC SCSI CARD 2940U KIT & SCSI CABLE TO SUIT & MICROSOFT INTELLI MOUSE PS2
25968		17-May-02	HUGALL & HOILE MALAGA	243.17	MILNE COUPLING 155 X 150 MM
25969		17-May-02	HOSEMASTERS	172.91	PARTS & LABOUR TO REPLACE HOSE ON ROOF OF 95074
25970		17-May-02	HEAVY AUTOMATICS	8,714.65	REPAIR AUTO TRANS 96712
25971		17-May-02	HYSTER WEST	23.61	FILTER TRANS A177 PART 1328692
25972		17-May-02	GEOFF KEMP	678.00	ELEC O/RANGE + SOLID
25973		17-May-02	KOMATSU AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	201.34	42A-06-15320 HOUR METER FOR FLEET
25974		17-May-02	MINI EXCAVATORS PTY LTD	2,351.25	MINI EXCAVATOR HIRE
25975		17-May-02	MAJOR MOTORS	239.80	1799389612 MUD GUARD
25976		17-May-02	MIRCO BROS PTY LTD	45.50	32MM R & D FILTER & 10MM PRESSURE HOSE (YELLOW)
25977		17-May-02	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	12,404.14	BUFFER, ROTALIFT HEAD, MODULE ELEC, MANUFACTURE EJECTOR CYLINDER PLATE, CONTROL ASSY PLUG & VARIOUS PARTS
25978		17-May-02	N E C BUSINESS SOLUTIONS P/L	572.00	RELOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF NEW TELEPHONE EXTENSIONS
25979		17-May-02	NEVERFAIL	223.70	BOTTLE CARTON 24
25980		17-May-02	P R AGENCIES INDUSTRIAL PTY LTD	206.64	CAMERA DISPOSABLE QUICK SNAP PANORAMIC FUJI
25981		17-May-02	ROSSOUND HIRE	995.03	EQUIPMENT HIRE FOR RAAF RETIREMENT VILLAGE
25982		17-May-02	RAECO	84.26	LARGE DESK TOP BOOK ORGANISER
25983		17-May-02	R & P ENGINEERING PTY LTD	488.40	PROFILE ASPHALT AT BUS BAY BELGRADE RD 29.4.02 & MOB & DEMOB 29.4.02
25984		17-May-02	SANDERSON ENGINEERING COMPANY	811.30	FUEL LINE, CHAINSAW, PROTECTOR MUFFLER, ACCELERATOR CABLE, FUEL TANK, IGNITION MODULE & VARIOUS PARTS
25985		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25986		17-May-02	SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT	5,460.83	AUTO SLACK ADJUSTER, ALTERNATOR, HYDRAULIC FILTER, WASHER, SPRING RETURN BRAKE, NOZZLE WINDSCREEN, PIVOT, ASSY CENTRE & VARIOUS TRUCK PARTS
25987		17-May-02	SECURITY SUPPLIES WA	134.20	X S1 HARCOR BAGS 300X400MM IN GREEN COLOUR
25988		17-May-02	STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L	3,713.55	DUSTPAN, CLEANING TABLETS, TOILET PAPER, HAND TOWELS, TOILET TISSUES & VARIOUS CLEANING SUPPLIES
25989		17-May-02	CADBURY SCHWEPPES	195.54	AQUAMOTION BEVERAGE TRADING STOCK
25990		17-May-02	SCANIA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	353.53	1318306-24V RELAY & 1304725 COOLANT SENDER
25991		17-May-02	TORO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	369.56	STUD DRIVE 242-34, CASTER WHEEL & TIRE & VEE BELT
25992		17-May-02	TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS	10,938.29	RETIC PVC FAUCET TEE, HUNTER & TORO SPRINKLERS & VARIOUS WATERING EQUIPMENT
25993		17-May-02	TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD	18.76	WHEEL NUT 1\2" FORD & WHEEL STUD 1/2"UNF SHORT KNURL
25994		17-May-02	TALDARA	198.00	FOAM CUPS
25995		17-May-02	WESTBOOKS	9.56	SMALLEST GIRL EVER
25996		17-May-02	W A HINO SALES & SERVICE	155.10	CYL CLUTCH
25997		17-May-02	WANNEROO HARDWARE	4,368.45	MINERAL TURPENTINE, ACCENT MASKING TAPE, PAINTS, SURVEY TAPE & VARIOUS HARDWARE PRODUCTS
25998		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
25999		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26000		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26001		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26002		17-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26003		17-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	1,779.65	20 SUMMONS
26004		17-May-02	ATKINS CARLYLE LTD	247.01	SCREEN WELDING ARC SAFE & PROTECTIVE INDUSTRIES DOCK
26005		17-May-02	AARQUEanitech	852.39	BOND 3I CORE, RESTORE PC CONNECTION FROM OFFICE MINOLTA MICROFILM SCANNER
26006		17-May-02	ADFORM	412.50	GRAPHICS TO FIRE TRUCK INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF ALL RED REFLECTIVE LT2 ON SIDE PILLARES & QRLT2 ON SCREEN
26007		17-May-02	WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS	293.70	PACIFIC HELMET
26008		17-May-02	W A LIBRARY SUPPLIES	207.35	7.5 CONTACT & DISK FILE ORGANISER
26009		17-May-02	WATTLEUP TRACTORS	455.05	SWITCH, SENSOR, NUTS, BOLTS, BUSH & BLADE
26010		17-May-02	WANNEROO CRANE HIRE	222.75	HIRE OF 10 TONNE CRANE TO FOR BUS SHELTER AT NORTHUMBERLAND AVE MARANGAROO - TIME INCLUDES TRAVEL TIME 19.3.02
26011		17-May-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS ARMAGUARD	294.61	KEY SAFE & CASH COLLECTION
26012		17-May-02	ASPHALTECH PTY LTD	51,079.47	ASHPALT & GRANITE SUPPLY & LAYING
26013		17-May-02	ACTION LOCK SERVICE	298.00	LOCKWOOD - MORTICE LOCK, THUMBTURN ADAPTOR, BARREL LEVER & INTERNAL LEVERSET & PLATE.
26014		17-May-02	AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L	2,387.83	AIRCONDITIONING MAINTENANCE
26015		17-May-02	AUTO SMART INTERNATIONAL	366.30	TRUCK WASH 185L
26016		17-May-02	BRICKWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD	40,022.40	COMPLETE 240L DK GREEN
26017		17-May-02	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	77.08	O RING, GASKET, WHEEL STUD & WHEEL NUTS
26018		17-May-02	CASTROL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	310.47	HARDWARE GREASE GUN CARTRIDGES CASTROL APXT 450GM
26019		17-May-02	COATES	262.40	DELIVERY HOSE & TUFFONE DRAINER
26020		17-May-02	CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AUST.	228.09	FUEL SENDER & SENSOR
26021		17-May-02	DBS FENCING	2,409.00	REPAIR VANDAL DAMAGED FENCE SHOWGROUNDS, PANEL OF FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING AT ELLIOTS ROAD & REMOVE & RELOCATE EXISTING BACKNET
26022		17-May-02	E R S AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	112.75	PARTS WASHER SERV/ENVIROMENTAL LEVY
26023		17-May-02	ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD	49.50	WASTE TYRE DISPOSAL
26024		17-May-02	FAL FOOD SERVICES	297.81	SUGAR COFFEE TEABAGS
26025		17-May-02	FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	3,898.92	FSMA COPY CHARGE ONLY 01/01/02 TO 31/03/02
26026		17-May-02	GEOFF'S TREE SERVICE	4,048.55	PRUNE, CHIP, REMOVE DEAD TREES, FICUS TREE
26027		17-May-02	GLAZEWELL P/L	2,172.27	GLASS WINDOWS REPLACEMENTS, INSTALLATION & REPAIRS OF VARIOUS COW COMMUNITY FACILITIES
26028		17-May-02	GEODETIC SUPPLY & REPAIR	132.00	INVERTED ARM BACK SAVER FOR USING MARKER SPRAY
26029		17-May-02	HUMES CONCRETE	16,828.13	PIPES & LINERS
26030		17-May-02	KERB QIC & CO	15,268.88	FOOTPATH, KERBING INSTALLATION & REPAIRS
26031		17-May-02	MAYDAY EARTHMOVING	1,375.00	HIRE OF SKID STEER AT JEFFERSON DR MARANGAROO 10, 11.4.02 - INCLUDES TRAVEL & HIRE OF SKID STEER AT DUNDEBAR RD 9, 10.4.02 INCLUDES TRAVEL
26032		17-May-02	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	71,765.56	FEES ON VARIOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
26033		17-May-02	MIKE GEARY SIGNS	326.22	TO SUPPLY & FIT HESTER AVE TO 3.5 M. ROAD SIGNS
26034		17-May-02	NORTHERN DISTRICTS PEST CONTROL	786.50	SPIDER, MIDGY PEST, COCKROACH, ANT & VARIOUS PEST TREATMENT
26035		17-May-02	PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD	1,405.99	FULLY COATED PVC GLOVE, BLACK SAFETY SHOES, FACE MASK & VARIOUS PROTECTIVE ITEMS
26036		17-May-02	PRESTIGE ALARMS	2,876.50	SERVICE CALLS, RELOCATION, INSTALLATION, REPROGRAMMING OF SECURITY ALARMS
26037		17-May-02	THE PRINTING FACTORY	1,357.91	BOOKMARKS, SURVEY CARDS, RECEIPT BOOKS & BUSINESS CARDS PRINTING
26038		17-May-02	PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY LTD	2,409.00	HIRE OF PROFILERS
26039		17-May-02	PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL	35.37	FLYING JACKET - NYLON YWILL
26040		17-May-02	PRECISION BADGES	1,595.00	GOLD PLATED 19MM LABEL PIN BADGE
26041		17-May-02	PRESSURE DYNAMICS	174.90	12V DC COIL SUIT SIZE 8, SVI-8-3-0-00 CARTRIDGE
26042		17-May-02	QUALITY SHEET METAL	1,111.00	6 ONLY 5.0MM MS CHANNELS AS PER QUOTE & 1 PLATE 2250X3420X5.0MM MS WITH OF CUT
26043		17-May-02	E & M J ROSHER	831.95	KIT SEAL REAR PUMPS
26044		17-May-02	RCG PTY LTD	12.22	LANDFILL - RUBBLE MIXED, GOVERN LANDFILL LEVY
26045		17-May-02	SHENTON ENTERPRISES PTY LTD	296.45	DISMANTLE DOLPHIN POOL CLEANER & REPLACE WORN IDLER PULLEYS REASSEMBLE UNIT & TEST
26046		17-May-02	STOPMASTER BRAKES	1,494.08	RELINE FRONT & REAR BRAKE SHOES
26047		17-May-02	TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD	15.32	AO210F BRAKE HANDLE
26048		17-May-02	TOTAL TORO	324.45	YOKE END SPLIT & VARIOUS PARTS SUPPLIES
26049		17-May-02	TECHNIFIRE 2000	697.35	REPAIRS AND MODIFICATIONS- TOYOTA FAST ATTACK WN31802 95022
26050		17-May-02	VIBRA INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION AUST	76.23	AF435KM AIR FILTER
26051		17-May-02	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	990.00	PROFESSIONAL FEES- WANN F/BALL CLUB KINGSLEY
26052		17-May-02	WESTERN RE-SPOTTING SERVICES	1,111.00	LINESPOTTING & GRINDING OF CENTRE LINE
26053		17-May-02	Y M C A OF PERTH	14,639.63	MOBILE YOUTH SERVICES
26054		17-May-02	CLEAN SWEEP	1,179.75	SWEEPING AT BUTTERWORTH & HOLLINGWORTH DRIVES, KINGSWAY NETBALL COMPLEX & GULLY EDUCTING
26055		17-May-02	J J HAWKINS AND COMPANY PTY LTD	4,015.00	TRANSPORT - 3 LOADERS & 2 FLOATS - BREAKWATER DR
26056		17-May-02	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	11,056.33	CONTRACT STAFF
26057		17-May-02	LAWN DOCTOR	440.00	APPLY NITROFORM SLOW NITROGENOUS FERTILISER
26058		17-May-02	METROCOUNT	563.00	STAINLESS STEEL SECURITY STROP
26059		17-May-02	WANNEROO PLUMBING	358.16	CLEAR BLOCKAGE ON OVERFLOWN DRAINS, HWS LEAK & REPLACE PTRV & COLD RELIEF LINES AT KINGSWAY SOCCER CLUB
26060		17-May-02	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	17,608.20	SECURITY LIGHTS, PUMP, INSTALL HANDS FREE UNIT, CARPARK WIRES & VARIOUS ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & REPAIRS
26061		17-May-02	WANNEROO CENTRAL NEWSAGENCY	39.80	2 X UBD 2002 DIRECTORIES
26062		20-May-02	KAY FRASER	57.00	DOG REG REFUND 04/1064
26063		20-May-02	MAXWELL ROBINSON & PHELPS	23,741.15	APPLICATION FOR HERBICIDE
26064		21-May-02	MR.MRS.S ROCCA	192.94	ADJ TO LEGAL COSTS
26065		21-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.05	P/CASH
26066		23-May-02	SANNY ANG	88.00	ORIGAMI WORKSHOP 23/04/02
26067		23-May-02	HONEYWELL SECONDHAND SHOP	165.00	13 SUREYA
26068		23-May-02	ROBERT TAYLOR	91.66	KEY HOLDER
26069		23-May-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	169.40	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO CACP CLIENTS 01/01/02 - 30/ 06/02
26070		23-May-02	DEWSONS MERRIWA	25.33	GROCERIES
26071		23-May-02	OUTER LIMITZ	90.00	PRIZES FOR SKATE/BMX/BLADE COMPETITIONS FOR YOUTH AS PART OF YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM
26072		23-May-02	CLEANAWAY	213.40	COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF 1 X 25KG CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITTE
26073		23-May-02	MARGARET GILCHRIST	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26074		23-May-02	EVAN MARTIN	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26075		23-May-02	SILVERTON LTD	1,718.00	P/N 192541-192542 REFUND RATES RAISED IN ERROR
26076		23-May-02	NORTH WHITFORDS ESTATE PTY LTD	6,053.40	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 125949 OVERCHARGED AS PROPERTY FULLY SUBDIVIDED AS AT 1/07/99
26077		23-May-02	MINDARIE KEYS JOINT VENTURE	1,074.83	REFUND RATES PROPERTY No. 153834 FROM 1/11/98 WHEN PROPERTY WAS SUBDIVIDED
26078		23-May-02	LEE TAN	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26079		23-May-02	CONCEPT MEDIA	183.90	LIBRARY FEATURE PAGE 24
26080		23-May-02	LUZIA JOHNSTONE	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26081		23-May-02	MUSEUMS AUSTRALIA (WA)	120.00	MUSEUMS CARING FOR CULTURE AT NEW NORCIA
26082		23-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26083		23-May-02	JENNY GILBERT	100.00	KEY HOLDER
26084		23-May-02	SIMON WATTERS	41.80	SEMINAR LEGAL ISSUES & RISK MANAGEMENT
26085		23-May-02	SYME MARMION & CO	11,894.00	FINAL PAYMENT CONSULTANCY SERVICE
26086		23-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26087		23-May-02	WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SPORTS FEDERATION	100.00	PRESENTATION BY BOB WELCH ON 23 APRIL 02 AT CITY OF WANNEROO
26088		23-May-02	ALLIED ARTIST & EVENT SERVICES TRUST	13,750.00	ARTIST FEES
26089		23-May-02	CURTIN CONSULTANCY SERVICES	55.00	CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE FEE
26090		23-May-02	P & G MCEWAN	95.60	P/N 192880 OVERPAID RATES
26091		23-May-02	BUTLER LAND COMPANY P/L &	21,107.68	P/N 147288 REFUND RATES INCORRECTLY RATED
26092		23-May-02	ELAINE R SEAL	15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26093		23-May-02	CYNTHIA SMART	57.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26094		23-May-02	MAUREEN KIRKNESS	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26095		23-May-02	TK SUTTON	30.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26096		23-May-02	KEITH ALLEN	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26097		23-May-02	DEAN MARTIN	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26098		23-May-02	INFORMA AUSTRALIA	55.00	SUBSCRIPTION-PLANT SPECS 2002
26099		23-May-02	COUNCIL HORTICULTURE PACK	100.00	COUNCIL HORTICULTURE PACK SIBSCRIPTION
26100		23-May-02	REPCOL COMMERICAL INVESTIGATORS	100.00	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL SUPPORT
26101		23-May-02	SCOTT ALLEN BIJA	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26102		23-May-02	KAREL & M KIVITS	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26103		23-May-02	WAYNE & LINDA JOHNSON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26104		23-May-02	ANDREW C JONES	300.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26105		23-May-02	MARK W SIBLEY	233.22	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26106		23-May-02	IAN & J GRAY	250.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26107		23-May-02	M DEI GIUDICI & C FALLOW	245.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26108		23-May-02	DAPHINE & D SAWKINS	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26109		23-May-02	CALL OUT HELP	220.00	SESSIONS G/WHEEN LIBRARY
26110		23-May-02	CHRISTINE L DEMUNCK	183.35	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 136902 PENSION REBATE OVERPAYMENT
26111		23-May-02	MR & MRS G J OINGLE	213.50	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 133938 PENSION REBATE
26112		23-May-02	KYM DUNBAR	161.44	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 190227 PENSION REBATE
26113		23-May-02	PETER POULTON	152.90	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 188910 PENSION REBATE
26114		23-May-02	MR & MRS D B MACLENNAN	269.08	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 176704 PENSION REBATE
26115		23-May-02	MCDONALDS PROPERTIES	1,030.38	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 153193
26116		23-May-02	A BEETON	213.50	REFUND RATES PROPERTY NO. 160985 PENSION REBATE
26117		23-May-02	TANIA MORGAN	297.80	REFUND COURSE UNABLE TO ATTEND
26118		23-May-02	PAULA SMITH	52.00	REFUND COURSE MOVING OUR OF AREA/SHUTDOWN
26119		23-May-02	SANDRA PAGRAM	63.25	PENSION REBATE
26120		23-May-02	NORMA WILKIE	400.00	OVERPAYMENT OF RATES ON 21/5/2
26121		23-May-02	STIK-EES	27.50	PASTEL DINOSAURS, HUMMING BIRDS, FIREHOUSE FRIENDS, SEA SHELLS, SILENT FLIGHT
26122		23-May-02	LYN VERGUNST	91.66	KEY HOLDER
26123		23-May-02	DEANNE HETHERINGTON	91.66	KEY HOLDER
26124		23-May-02	JOE ARRIGO	91.66	KEY HOLDER
26125		23-May-02	STEVE BARBARICH	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26126		23-May-02	BOOMA AUTO ELECTRICS	82.50	MAKE A/C HOSE
26127		23-May-02	DBS FENCING	164.44	SOILED WIRE FLEXIABLE 5KG
26128		23-May-02	BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS	21.25	1 GIFT VOUCHER
26129		23-May-02	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	1,644.90	MILNE RED COUPLING & VARIOUS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
26130		23-May-02	FORPARK AUSTRALIA	3,545.63	GALV CAPS/STRAP SEATS
26131		23-May-02	HOSEMASTERS	143.76	REPLACE HOSE
26132		23-May-02	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	247.50	REPROGRAM MOTOROLA MAXTRAX RADIO
26133		23-May-02	MCLEOD & CO	17.60	DOLA TITLES SEARCHES
26134		23-May-02	M M ELECTRICAL MERCHANDISING	214.50	PULL LINE DISPENSER PACK/LOOK UP FEE
26135		23-May-02	STANDARDS AUSTRALIA	162.03	ROAD LIGHTING STANDARDS
26136		23-May-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	54.55	P/CASH
26137		23-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	97.80	P/CASH
26138		23-May-02	COCKMAN HOUSE PETTY CASH	51.05	P/CASH
26139		23-May-02	HOMESWEST - EAST PERTH	81,513.36	P/N 150219 & 197393 REFUND RATES - INCORRECTLY RATED
26140		23-May-02	JUDITH HUGHES	395.51	TRAVEL & CHILDCARE EXPENSES MARCH/APRIL
26141		23-May-02	LOUISE HAMILTON & SHAUN NOTTLE	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
26142		23-May-02	MOUNTCASTLE PTY LTD	763.13	MURCHISON RIVER HAT NAVY
26143		23-May-02	NORMAN DENNIS	41.66	KEY HOLDER
26144		23-May-02	PAJO DESIGN	269.60	POTTERY CLASSES
26145		23-May-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	86.75	P/CASH
26146		23-May-02	W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC.	139.99	SEMINAR DOT NEWTON ATTENDED
26147		24-May-02	PEOPLE'S CHOICE AWARD	500.00	ART AWARD WINNER
26148		24-May-02	KEY HYDRAULICS	2,904.00	REPAIRS AT THE MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY, MOTIVATION DRIVE, WANGARA
26149		24-May-02	ORANGE	4,768.95	ORANGE CDMA
26150		24-May-02	WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	92.40	WASHER, BOLTS, NUTS & VARIOUS ITEMS
26151		24-May-02	AUSTRALIA POST	7,488.02	MAIL PREPARATION APRIL
26152		24-May-02	ALINE BRICK PAVING	3,903.90	HANDRAILS, PICK UP BRICKS, BRICKPAVING OF VERGES AND VARIOUS
26153		24-May-02	AIM	55.30	BOOKS - QUALITY CUSTOMER SEVICE 4TH EDITION & MANAGING QUALITY CUSTOMER SERVICE
26154		24-May-02	BELL HEALTH	126.86	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
26155		24-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	615.37	CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS SALARY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER AT YELLAGONGA PROJECT 01-12 04/02
26156		24-May-02	CABCHARGE	440.95	COURIER CHARGES
26157		24-May-02	CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD	1,980.74	FUEL FOR LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET
26158		24-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	7.70	WORKSHOP MANUAL
26159		24-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	320.93	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE PAY TO RATES
26160		24-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	300.00	OVER 50'S EXERCISE CLASS
26161		24-May-02	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	534.00	CATERING FOR FIRST AID TRAINING COURSE & VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
26162		24-May-02	CSD NETWORK	240.00	COMM DEVELOP TRAINING 8/5/2 & 26/6/2
26163		24-May-02	DEPT OF TRANSPORT	47.50	END OF QUARTER VEHICLE SEARCHES FOR PERIOD ENDING MARCH 2002
26164		24-May-02	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	858.00	TOPO DIGITAL DATA
26165		24-May-02	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	82.50	EUTHANASIA OF FIVE DOGS
26166		24-May-02	GEL GROUP PTY LTD	2,920.23	WINDOWS 2000 ROLL-OUT OFFICER (P JACKSON)
26167		24-May-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	7,407.74	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO DAY CARE CENTRES, CACP CLIENTS & RECREATIONAL CARE BUS DRIVER
26168		24-May-02	INST OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING (WA) INC	1,430.00	REGISTRATIONS 2002 STATE CONFERENCE
26169		24-May-02	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	70.40	CLEAN GUTTERS AT BLACKMORE CHILD HEALTH CTRE
26170		24-May-02	ICE TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	852.50	REPAIR TO ICE MACHINES
26171		24-May-02	K & F CONCRETE	6,270.00	LIME-STONE PATH REPAIR TO KOONDOOLA REGIONAL BUSHLAND
26172		24-May-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	25.08	WANNEROO SUBIACO COURIER
26173		24-May-02	MUSEUMS AUSTRALIA	75.00	PUCHASE OF BOOK MUSEUM METHODS
26174		24-May-02	MIRAGE TECHNOLOGY	180.00	EXCEL INTRODUCTION L SIMPSON 13/05/02
26175		24-May-02	MARGARET FERGUSON	500.00	PLANNING & DESIGNING GOLD PROGRAM MARCH/APRIL & MAY 2002 & REIMBURSEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
26176		24-May-02	NURSERYMENS SUPPLY	3,009.60	NITROFORM BLU CHIP
26177		24-May-02	PERTH HOME CARE	207.50	PRI 31979/1 0930LYNNE
26178		24-May-02	PHOTO PERTH WHOLESALE	1,135.00	OLYMPUS C200 DIGITAL CAMERA, AC ADAPTOR, LENMAR CHARGER
26179		24-May-02	QUALITY PRESS	678.70	4PP A5 COVERS. PRINTED 3 COLOURS (2 PMS PLUS 1 METALLIC) 1 SIDE ONLY ON 150GSM MONZA SATIN.A4 SIZE FOLDED TO 4PP A5.PRINTED 2 UP 1 SIDE, PRE-PRESS, PRINTING
26180		24-May-02	SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD	1,787.50	SERVICES FOR 25/03/02 TO 26/04/02
26181		24-May-02	ST JOHN AMBULANCE OF AUSTRALIA	75.00	SENIOR FIRST AID REFRESHER 29/4/2
26182		24-May-02	STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS	98.67	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
26183		24-May-02	STEVEN HART ARCHITECT	880.00	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - NEW COMMUNITY CENTRE WARRADALE PARK
26184		24-May-02	SELLEYS ENGINEERING	880.00	PRESIDING AND END PLATES FOR C2 AND C5 AT MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY, MOTIVATION DRIVE, WANGARA
26185		24-May-02	MARY NICOLETTAS	330.00	CLASSES BELLYDANCE TUTION
26186		24-May-02	WESTERN POWER	15,478.10	RELOCATE & REPLACE POLES 144 & 145 CARABOODA ROAD TO ALLOW FOR ROAD WORKS
26187		24-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26188		24-May-02	WESTERN POWER	27,144.13	CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING & CHARGES ON VARIOUS PARKS, CENTRES & OFFICES
26189		24-May-02	WASTEDRIVE PTY LIMITED	7,089.60	4.514 TONNES 2.64MM ANNEALED SPECIAL BAILING WIRE DELIVERED TO WANGARAN MRF
26190		24-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	1,092.95	13 WARRANTS
26191		27-May-02	JOONDALUP COURT	1,483.25	16 SUMMONS
26192		27-May-02	W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC.	10,674.36	APRIL 2002 MARKETFORCE ADVERTISING
26193		28-May-02	PEET & CO LTD	38,107.09	CARRAMAR PK STAGE 4G TAPPING WAPC116160
26194		30-May-02	MARLENE BYNDER	300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE
26195		30-May-02	FOCUS SETTLEMENTS	338.28	P/N 167861 OVERPAYMENT OF RATES - PROP SETTLEMENT
26196		30-May-02	SKATEBOARDING ASSOC OF W. A.	100.00	2 X SKATEBOARD INSTRUCTORS AT CLARKSON 01/05/02
26197		30-May-02	INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AUST (WA) INC	1,551.00	2002 MEMBERSHIP FEES & ROAD SAFETY AUDIT SEMINAR 03-05 APR 02
26198		30-May-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	311.03	AGED CARE SERVICES 13-18/04/02
26199		30-May-02	VOLUNTEERING WA	75.00	NVW BREAKFAST LAUNCH 13/05/02
26200		30-May-02	SPORTS TURF TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD	924.00	CONDUCT ORGANIC FINES, INSPECT & PREPARE REPORT
26201		30-May-02	DIVA FLOWERS	70.00	WREATH T LOFTUS DEL
26202		30-May-02	ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENDERS OFFICE	120.00	COAST LAW CONFERENCE 2002 FULL REGISTRATION FOR CR T LOFTUS
26203		30-May-02	GEARY SIGNS	204.05	SIGNAGE FOR RECREATION CENTRE IN WARRADALE
26204		30-May-02	OUTER LIMITZ	140.00	WHEELS & BEARINGS
26205		30-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26206		30-May-02	LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE OF WA	5,380.10	BOOKS - ADULT NON FICTION/FICTION & JUNIOR
26207		30-May-02	BUBBLEMANIA	390.00	GIANT BUBBLE WORKSHOP 14-15/05/02
26208		30-May-02	EVAN MARTIN	41.66	KEYHOLDER MONTH MAY02
26209		30-May-02	LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES ASSOC. (WA)	220.00	CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP
26210		30-May-02	CHARLES ALDOUS-BALL	187.00	ARBORICULTURAL REPORT 31 TAYWOOD DR WANN
26211		30-May-02	A TOUCH OF CLASS WEDDING STATIONERY	110.55	SHEETS A4 MAUVE POP DL ENVELOPES
26212		30-May-02	GIRRAWHEEN KOONDOOLA JUNIOR	50.00	BOND REFUND HIRE DATE 14.11.96 T9506
26213		30-May-02	SONJA PFISTER	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26214		30-May-02	SHEILA LYON	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26215		30-May-02	KYLIE BESSER	6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26216		30-May-02	GERALD HERBU	38.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26217		30-May-02	BELINDA BUITENHUIS	20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26218		30-May-02	KRISTEN ST JOHN	18.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26219		30-May-02	TRACEY FEEHAN	6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26220		30-May-02	MARY J LOVEJOY	9.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
26221		30-May-02	L BETTY	540.00	P/N 176336 WRONG AMOUNT PAID
26222		30-May-02	LANE G HEENAN	26.91	P/N 179071 OVERPAID
26223		30-May-02	G SHARIFZADEH	329.33	P/N 198076 PAID TWICE
26224		30-May-02	MICHAEL FRANK MANN	330.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 450 P 7798 VOL 57 FOL 33A
26225		30-May-02	MICHAEL BURNES & CAROL JOHNSON	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 10 RANWORTH ROAD HOCKING LOT 315 P 24233 VOL 2199 FOL 875
26226		30-May-02	RICK P & TRACI L GARCIA	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 18 BATON ROUGE DRIVE MINDARIE LOT 998 P 23586 VOL 2172 FOL 116
26227		30-May-02	MARISSA CHUBB & MICHAEL WILLIAMS	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 23 KIRKIMBI STREET CARRAMAR LOT 1407 DP 28778 VOL 2510 FOL 320
26228		30-May-02	DEREK ARCHER & KAY M PEOPLES	264.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 6 GLENGYLE TURN QUINNS ROCKS LOT 403 DP 27516 VOL 2215 FOL 111
26229		30-May-02	MELISSA S & PAUL A EDWARDS	298.65	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 15 LITHGOW DRIVE CLARKSON LOT 1661 DP 24586
26230		30-May-02	CHRISTINE D SALIB & SAMEH O HANNA	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 10 SUMBA TURN MINDARIE LOT 1187 P 23984 VOL 2184 FOL 797
26231		30-May-02	LESLIE S & SUSAN M MCGOLDRICK	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 15 DUXFORD STREET BUTLER LOT 312 DP 27850 VOL 2503 FOL 379
26232		30-May-02	DAVID R & NATASHA L VILLA	250.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 34 NORWOOD LOOP TAPPING LOT 996 P 23852
26233		30-May-02	ROBINA SMITH	750.00	1ST INSTALMENT PAYMENT COMM ART PROJECT
26234		30-May-02	CANCELLED	0.00
26235		30-May-02	MELANIE SWINDEN	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 16 ROSEDALE VISTA HOCKING LOT 246 P 24139 VOL 2196 FOL 948
26236		30-May-02	ROBERT CHARLES KEENAN	313.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 57 DALLAS CRESCENT LOT 172 P 9614 VOL 363 FOL 036A
26237		30-May-02	DONELLE GADENNE	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 9 WYOLA LANE LOT 151 DP 29015 VOL 2511 FOL 26
26238		30-May-02	ANNE EVERSEN & CHRIS MCGILL	345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 760 DP 24966 VOL 2208 FOL 953
26239		30-May-02	BRENDA TRELOAR	300.00	REFUND HALL HIRE AT JOHN MALONEY CLUBROOMS 04/05/02 TO 05/05/02
26240		30-May-02	ROYA AHMAD	300.00	REFUND HALL HIRE AT ADDISON FUNCTION ROOM
26241		30-May-02	DEERING AUTRONICS	672.38	CAMERA 4.5 BLACK/WHITE
26242		30-May-02	PROCESS WELDING & MAINT SVCS	1,517.01	REPAIRS TO PLASTIC BAILER
26243		30-May-02	SANDERSON ENGINEERING COMPANY	217.25	D/SHAFT-FS85/120/200 HT70 HL75, DRIVE TUBE
26244		30-May-02	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	15,157.40	STATIONERY FOR MONTH APRIL2002
26245		30-May-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	25.10	PETTY CASH
26246		30-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	86.70	PETTY CASH
26247		30-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.00	PETTY CASH
26248		30-May-02	EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	173.00	REPLACE LH REAR DOOR QTR TINT
26249		30-May-02	GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	304.70	RED OUT 5 LITRE
26250		30-May-02	GEL GROUP PTY LTD	2,773.65	WINDOWS 2000 ROLL OUT OFFICER P JACKSON
26251		30-May-02	MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS	400.00	BBOY WORKSHOP
26252		30-May-02	TAYLOR BURRELL	2,343.00	CPTED MANUAL/KOONDOOLA PROJECT
26253		30-May-02	OSBORNE PARK WELDING SUPPLIES	95.15	CONTACT TIP & MIG WIRE
26254		30-May-02	JONES LANG LASALLE ADVISORY SERVICES PTY LTD	3,960.00	CONSULTANCY ADVICE ON QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PK
26255		30-May-02	LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGERS AUSTRALIA	60.50	REGISTRATION - CEO'S FORUM - 31/05/02 C JOHNSON
26256		30-May-02	FASTWAY COURIERS (WA)	110.00	1 PK OF 20 - 841341
26257		30-May-02	WANNEROO CRICKET ASSOCIATION	300.00	HALL HIRE FROM 27/04/02 TO 28/04/02
26258		30-May-02	ANGUS & ROBERTSON - WHITFORDS	237.60	18 BOOKS
26259		30-May-02	ACTIMED AUSTRALIA	13.75	DAKTAREN TINCTURE 30ML 2%
26260		30-May-02	AUTO DOOR SYSTEMS	1,136.19	SERVICE CALLS ON FAULTY SECURITY SYSTEMS & TRAFFIC SIGNALS & INSTALL & WIRE 2 X K4 KEYSWITCHES
26261		30-May-02	A CLASS LINEMARKING SERVICE	473.00	LINEMARKING AT GRIFFITH PARK, YANCHEP BEACH & 2 ROCKS ROAD
26262		30-May-02	BUDGET RENT A CAR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	2,261.60	HIRE OF A SMALL SEDAN
26263		30-May-02	BUCKLEYS WASTE DISPOSAL	734.00	WASH DOWN SILT PIT & NEW PIPE REQUIRED TO REPLACE SOAKWELL BEHIND TANK BLOCKED WITH ROOTS
26264		30-May-02	BGC BLOKPAVE	2,090.88	EASI-COBBLE & EASIPAVE- TERRACOTTA & CHARCOAL
26265		30-May-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS P/L	4,376.35	TEMPORARY SECONDMENT OF ROAD DESIGNER FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW OF THE EAST WANN ARTERIAL ROADS
26266		30-May-02	COASTAL SERVICES	1,867.80	GUMBLOSSOM HALL ACTIVITY ROOMS 3 & 4 REPAIRS ZIP BOILING WATER UNIT
26267		30-May-02	COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS	10,235.53	ADVERTISING FOR FEBRUARY 2002
26268		30-May-02	CURTAIN MAN	275.00	HOLLAND BLINDS & INSTALLATION
26269		30-May-02	CONTI'S WINES	237.60	2 CARTONS CHENIN BLANC
26270		30-May-02	CASEWEST PTY LTD	179.85	AIR FILTERS
26271		30-May-02	DYMOCKS WARWICK	330.41	BOOKS FOR YANCHEP & GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
26272		30-May-02	FAL FOOD SERVICES	1,328.37	MILK, COFFEE, COOKIES, TEABAGS AS STAFF AMENITIES
26273		30-May-02	FORPARK AUSTRALIA	6,828.80	LIMESTONE PIT, SAND PIT & REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE & RELOCATION AT ORMISTON PARK
26274		30-May-02	GREEN & GOLD HIAB SERVICES	1,155.00	CRANE TRUCK, HIAB TRUCK TO DELIVER PAVING BRICKS, SLABS, DRAINAGE MATERIALS
26275		30-May-02	IN TOUCH COMMUNICATIONS	456.50	ACCESSORY PACK FOR KYO 2135 & KYOCERA 2135 HANDSET (NO SERVICE)
26276		30-May-02	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	1,101.47	METRE READINGS- VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
26277		30-May-02	J B PRECISE ENGINEERING	5,038.00	WATER PUMP, HUB MACHINE, REPAIR THROTTLE, 6 MACHINE NEW TIERODS, NEW TOWBALL, NEW LIFTING ARM BOLT, MAKE UP SPACERS, MANUFACTURE LARGE JOCKEY WHEELS, RESLEEVE ROLLER END CAPS, RETHREAD CHAIN SAW HOUSING SHAFT
26278		30-May-02	JMAC INDUSTRIES	544.50	HAND CLEANER, CLEANING RAGS & RED DEVIL DEGREASER
26279		30-May-02	LANDFILL GAS & POWER	66.31	MONTHLY CHARGES LANDFILL GAS FLARE BADGERUP
26280		30-May-02	LYONS & PEIRCE	2,288.00	HIRE CAMEL TRUCK & OPERATOR FOR 16 HOURS TO VACUUM SUMPS & JET STORM WATER LINES
26281		30-May-02	METAL ARTWORK CREATIONS	66.56	SILVER BADGES & MAGNETIC ATTACHMENTS
26282		30-May-02	MOTORLIFE	188.10	AUTO AEROSOL INOX 300 GM
26283		30-May-02	NETWORK FOODS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	113.84	MINT CARAMELS 6KG, ICE MINT MIDELS 3KG, SHERBIES 3KG
26284		30-May-02	ORANGE	571.09	PAGER NETWORK CHARGES
26285		30-May-02	P P K ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE P/L	6,556.00	PROVISION DUAL CARRIAGEWAY DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES
26286		30-May-02	RYDELL INDUSTRIAL BELTING CO	885.17	RECUP BELT ON PLASTIC LINE, 1 PULLEY LAGGED IN DIAMOND GROOVE
26287		30-May-02	M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD	3,978.70	QUINNS BEACH COASTAL PROTECTION - REASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS
26288		30-May-02	RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD	18,772.27	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DEC 01 - MAR 02
26289		30-May-02	A & J SALAMONE	699.60	SUPPLY OF FILLING SAND FOR FRANKLIN ROAD
26290		30-May-02	SCOTTS TRIMMING SERVICE	27.50	REPAIR HARNESS
26291		30-May-02	STANDARDS AUSTRALIA	719.40	PURCHASE OF MANUALS- AS4915-2002 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AS4916-2002 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
26292		30-May-02	STATE LAW PUBLISHER	48.80	GOVT GAZETTE ADVERTISING- DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME, LOCAL GOVERNMENT (FUNCTIONS & GENERAL) REGULATIONS 1996
26293		30-May-02	SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD	2,711.36	ELBOW, STEM, SUCTION, HOSE, NIPPLES, HOE, ADAPTORS, COUPLING & VARIOUS ITEMS
26294		30-May-02	SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD	770.52	MAKE UP HYDRAULIC HOSES, STEMS, FERRUL BODY & VARIOUS ITEMS
26295		30-May-02	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	54,201.25	AUTO OILS, CARD ADMIN CHARGE DIESEL
26296		30-May-02	FORCORP PTY LTD	3,557.62	REPAIRS TO STROBE LIGHTS, CAMERA SYSTEM & VARIOUS
26297		30-May-02	TELETRONICS	298.98	PANASONIC KXTC1851 CORDLESS PHONE
26298		30-May-02	TRUCKLINE	125.90	HYD VALVE 379604-1 12V
26299		30-May-02	UNDERGROUND SERVICES AUSTRALIA	275.00	LOCATE UNDERGROUND TELSTRA SERVICES
26300		30-May-02	VALUER GENERAL'S OFFICE	950.75	GRV INT VALS METRO SHARED
26301		30-May-02	VARISIGNS	1,751.27	6 ADDITIONAL SIGNS
26302		30-May-02	WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE	5,173.20	SUPPLY BOLLARD FOOTING MOUNTING CAGES, FABRICATE GALVANIZED MESH BOX GUTTER GUARDS, METAL DOWNPIPE GUARDS, PARK SIGN POSTS & VARIOUS METAL FABRICATIONS & MODIFICATIONS
26303		30-May-02	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	612.55	MILK SUPPLY
26304		30-May-02	WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE	935.00	TOWING SERVICES APR02
26305		30-May-02	WORK CLOBBER	97.00	30732 SAFETY BOOTS
26306		30-May-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	1,166.00	REPAIR DRAWER, COMPACTOR PLATES & HYDRAULIC TANK BRACKETS
26307		30-May-02	ALUMAYNE PRODUCTS	66.00	ABBEYVILLE PARK REPAIR CABINET DOOR
26308		30-May-02	AARQUEanitech	479.39	METER CHARGE FOR KIP 2900 & PURCH OF YELLOW & BLACK INK CARTRIDGE
26309		30-May-02	ALGAR BURNS PTY LTD	370.18	GOLP ACCESS 2002 32 WINDOWS LIC
26310		30-May-02	AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD	571.57	HOSE FITTINGS, VAR GAS CYLINDERS & GAS CYL RENTALS
26311		30-May-02	BIG ROCK TOYOTA/WILD WEST	373.84	04314 6022 C CLUTCH KIT
26312		30-May-02	BUNNINGS LIMITED	3,593.09	GRAFFITI SEALER, PAINTS, TIMBER SERVICES CHARGES, WOOD WORK TOOLS & EQUIPMENT DRILL BITS, TREATED PINE & VARIOUS BUILDING SUPPLIES
26313		30-May-02	BITUMEN EMULSIONS	1,089.00	1500 LITRES OF RS2K
26314		30-May-02	BRING COURIERS	21.59	WANNEROO NEDLANDS COURIER CHARGE
26315		30-May-02	BEAUREPAIRES	10,640.41	NEW TYRES & MOTOR PARTS
26316		30-May-02	BYWEST PTY LTD	1,013.45	BLAD GALLAGHER TT 45028
26317		30-May-02	BUDGET PORTABLES	1,156.44	HIRE OF SECURITY CONTAINERS, CHEMICAL TOILETS & LUNCHROOM
26318		30-May-02	J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD	187.00	GUN GREASE K29 CARTRIDGE/BULK 450G X 2
26319		30-May-02	BRAVO HIRE	166.00	HIRE OF TRENCHER 16.4.02
26320		30-May-02	CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA	88.00	N70ZZ BATTERY
26321		30-May-02	COVENTRYS	2,298.08	LAMP REAR COMBINATION, SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREW, BALL VALVE & VARIOUS HARDWARE ITEMS
26322		30-May-02	CONSOLIDATED BEARING COMPANY	361.19	FOXLINE, AIRFREIGHT
26323		30-May-02	COATES WRECKAIR	48.83	DRILL (ELECTRIC) HAMMER
26324		30-May-02	CARABOODA ROLL ON INSTANT LAWN	5,695.25	INSTALL ROLL ON KIKUYU GRASS
26325		30-May-02	CHUBB SAFES	198.00	SERVICE CALL ON FINANCE SAFE
26326		30-May-02	DRIVE IN ELECTRICS	3,524.20	HAZARD LIGHTS INDICATORS, REPAIR INDICATORS, LIGHTS INSTALLATION, TRANSMISSION NEUTRALIZE, ALTERNATOR REPAIRS & VARIOUS FLEET REPAIRS
26327		30-May-02	DIAMOND LOCK & KEY	508.13	MAKE 2 KEYS TO AIR CONDITIONING UNIT LOCK, 24 TWIN KEYS, 570 CYLINDER & INSTALL ADAPTOR
26328		30-May-02	EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD	8.00	A4 COLOUR COPIES X 8
26329		30-May-02	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	19,070.19	SUPPLY & INSTALL WIRE IRRIGATION AT FRANGIPANI PK, VALVES, RAINSPRAY 260 NOZZLE, BATTERY OPERATED VALVE CONTROL & VARIOUS RETICULATION PRODUCTS
26330		30-May-02	FRICTION CONTROL	17.60	BALL BEARINGS
26331		30-May-02	FUCHS LUBRICANTS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD	4,955.26	TITAL ATF 4000 205 LT PK, OIL HYD AUTO CLOVIS 68 &OIL ENG UNILUBE TITAL UNIVERSAL HD1540
26332		30-May-02	GUARDIAN DATA	1,161.60	SDRAM 128MB 168 PIN PC133 A-GRADE
26333		30-May-02	HYDRAULIC HOIST & WINCH	392.15	3LN-3 SEAL KIT, RN452 GLAND NUT & RN464 GLAND NUT
26334		30-May-02	HOSEMASTERS	254.56	HYDRAULIC HOSE FITTING, REPLACE HOSE ON DRIVE MOTOR
26335		30-May-02	JACKSONS DRAWING SUPPLIES P/L	103.04	SCALE RULE 91912W & SUSPENSION STRIPS 311-100M
26336		30-May-02	KNIGHT & SONS	149.50	20KG PAL CHICKEN, 20KG PAL MINCE & 20KG PAL WORKING DOG
26337		30-May-02	KOMATSU AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	191.34	KA28300-KB7210 METER SERVICE HOUR 98834
26338		30-May-02	LAWRENCE & HANS0N	497.87	CABLE, SLEEVING, CONDUIT, CEMENT, BEND, ROPE, WIRE & VARIOUS HARDWARE ITEMS
26339		30-May-02	MINI EXCAVATORS PTY LTD	581.63	EXCAVATOR HIRE
26340		30-May-02	MIRCO BROS PTY LTD	4.40	COPPER SULPHATE PER KILO
26341		30-May-02	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	11,424.56	OVERHAUL BIN LIFTER ASSEMBLY, FILTER CLOGG SWITCHES VALVES, RUNNER DIRT SHOE, PAD BUFFER EJECTOR PANEL, FILTER ELEMENT & VARIOUS MECHANICAL REPAIRS
26342		30-May-02	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	1,294.59	PROGRAM EXISTING BUILDING MAINTENANCE RADIOS TO ALSO COMMUNICATE ON RANGERS & CSO BANDS, SITE DEINSTALL & REINSTALL OF RADIO & HANDS FREE, REPLACEMENT OF U/S VOLTAGE CONVERTER IN TRUCK, REPROGRAM 3 MOTOROLA MTX RADIOS
26343		30-May-02	MCINTOSH & SON	269.60	1 ADJUSTING NUT & 1 ADJUSTER ROD
26344		30-May-02	NOVUS WINDSCREEN REPAIRS	654.00	REPLACE FRONT WINDSCREEN, SUPPLY & FIT REAR WINDSCREEN
26345		30-May-02	PEERLESS EMULSION WA PTY LTD	35.75	GYM CLEAN
26346		30-May-02	R & P ENGINEERING PTY LTD	2,890.80	FLYNN, PINJAR PROFILING & SWEEPING
26347		30-May-02	RCG PTY LTD	279.65	LANDFILL CLEAN INCOMING & RUBBLE MIXED & GOVERNMENT LANDFILL LEVY
26348		30-May-02	SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY	459.59	COTTON BALLS, NEEDLES, SYRINGES & VARIOUS MEDICAL SUPPLIES
26349		30-May-02	SANDERSON ENGINEERING COMPANY	72.10	LINK CHAINSAW CHAIN, RING SET PISTON
26350		30-May-02	STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L	118.27	CLEANING ROAR & GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES
26351		30-May-02	CADBURY SCHWEPPES	160.55	SOFT DRINKS FOR AQUAMOTION TRADING STOCK
26352		30-May-02	TECHNICAL IRRIGATION IMPORTS	871.00	UPGRADE OF HYDROMETER
26353		30-May-02	W A LIBRARY SUPPLIES	747.56	SYLEX ADJ CUSTOM WRITING SLOPE
26354		31-May-02	BEAUREPAIRES	4,680.87	FLEETS P/O 43323
26355		31-May-02	EXPRESS CHEMICALS	220.00	BOOST & BALANCE 20KG
26356		31-May-02	TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD	312.39	PIN, NUT, ROCKER ARM FORKED, SHACKLE PLATE NYLON BUSH
26357		31-May-02	TOUCAN DISPLAY SYSTEMS	31.22	TRIFOLD BROCHURE HOLDER
26358		31-May-02	AUSTRALIA POST	8,576.34	TRANSACTIONS CHARGES FOR RATES
26359		31-May-02	AMF BOWLING CENTERS (AUST) INTERNATIONAL INC	69.30	BOWLING CITY OF WANNEROO GOLD PROGRAM
26360		31-May-02	AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS	7.00	PAYROLL DED: F/N ENDING 24-MAY-02
26361		31-May-02	AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION	77.40	PAYROLL DED: F/N ENDING 24-MAY-02
26362		31-May-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	86.70	PETTY CASH
26363		31-May-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	50.00	PETTY CASH
26364		31-May-02	ADVANCED METAL INDUSTRIES	18,150.00	INSTALLATION OF GUARDRAIL - UNDERPASS, MARMION AVENUE NORTH OF GREYHOUND DRIVE.
26365		31-May-02	ACE INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTORS	456.50	7 X CALIBRATE WORKSHOP TOOLS
26366		31-May-02	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	807.69	PAYROLL DED: F/N ENDING 12-APR-02 APPLICATION NO. A3606010501
26367		31-May-02	BELL HEALTH	390.23	CACP HEALTH CARE SERVICES
26368		31-May-02	BAPTIST CARE	383.00	HOME CARE SERVICES
26369		31-May-02	BEST LOOK PAINTING & DECORATING CONTRACTORS	5,021.50	PAINTING OF GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE
26370		31-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	200.20	SALE OF PUBLICATION COPY OF WANNEROO, JOONDALUP & YANCHEP PLANNING PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT, EDUCATIONAL CD ROMS, REFUND FOR PAYMENT OF LOST BOOK BELONGING TO THE CITY OF JOONDALUP
26371		31-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP PLANT HIRE	85.25	HIRE OF CHERRY PICKER FOR KINGSWAY
26372		31-May-02	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	1,687.00	PAYROLL DED: F/N ENDING 24-MAY-02
26373		31-May-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	1,311.75	50% CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS LEGAL COSTS
26374		31-May-02	CUMMINS	513.87	RX EXCHANGE WATER PUMP
26375		31-May-02	CATHEDRAL OFFICE PRODUCTS	55.00	2 PAMPHLET HOLDERS
26376		31-May-02	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	232.10	PETTY CASH
26377		31-May-02	DEPT OF MINERALS & ENERGY WA	14.00	RENEWAL TO STORE DANGEROUS GOODS FOR SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE & HYDROCHLORIC ACID
26378		31-May-02	DEPT OF INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY-CAMS	73.26	CHARGES FOR WA FASTPAY APRIL 2002
26379		31-May-02	DEWSONS WANNEROO	317.86	GROCERIES
26380		31-May-02	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	572.35	CONSULTATION, CHLORASONE EYE OINTMENT & STAIN CORNEA & EUTHANASIA OF 31 DOGS
26381		31-May-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	84.00	PETTY CASH
26382		31-May-02	ENVIRONMENTAL LAND CLEARING SERVICES	1,155.00	TRANSPORT OF MULCH TO CORNER OF ARITI AVENUE AND SCENIC DRIVE
26383		31-May-02	GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY OFFICE P/C	108.35	PETTY CASH
26384		31-May-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	16,436.37	PERSONAL & RECREATIONAL CARE, CACP & HACC SERVICES
26385		31-May-02	HUGHANS SAW SERVICE	105.58	SHARPEN SAW BLADES, 80T TCT BLADE TUNGSTEN TIP 3/8 X .180" 9.5 X 4.57 X 3.2. NOTE: (1) BANDSAW BLADE U/S 10MM X 3 TPI SILCO BANDSAW 3 X 3.175
26386		31-May-02	HURI-CAIN SPORTS	105.60	SYNTHETIC LEATHER BASKETBALLS X 3 SIZE 7 FOR COMPETITION PRIZES
26387		31-May-02	INTERACTIVE VIDEO SECURITY PTY LTD	436.59	ATTEND TO FAULT WITH THE UPS ON THE 02/05/02 & 09/05/02
26388		31-May-02	JOONDALUP PHOTO-DESIGN	58.80	SUPPLY IMAGE ON CD/WEB
26389		31-May-02	K & F CONCRETE	3,744.40	REPAIR & RELAY BRICK PAVING UNDER PERGOLA BROADVIEW PARK, CEMENT RENDER ENTRANCE STATEMENT CASTELON WAY, SHORTEN CENTRAL WICKET ALDERSEA PARK & INSTALL SEAT & BASE AT YANCHEP LAGOON, INSTALL 9 PARK BENCH SEATS
26390		31-May-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	292.60	COURIER SERVICES
26391		31-May-02	MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL	1,186.74	PAYROLL DED: F/N ENDING 24-MAY-02
26392		31-May-02	NON-ORGANIC DISPOSALS	1,822.70	DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS GRADES G2, G3 & G4
26393		31-May-02	OZ VIDEO	660.00	RE EDITING OF CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE VIDEO & CD COPIES
26394		31-May-02	PARKS & LEISURE AUSTRALIA	40.00	TURF'S UP SEMINAR M MAHENDRAN D GREEN
26395		31-May-02	PEDAL 'N' PADDLE ADVENTURES	245.00	7 PAX MOUNTAIN BIKING CITY OF WANNEROO GOLD PROGRAM
26396		31-May-02	PAJO DESIGN	150.00	TEACHING POTTERY CLASSES
26397		31-May-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	61.90	PETTY CASH
26398		31-May-02	QUALITY PRESS	579.70	PRINTING 600 COPIES OF SMART CLUBS BROCHURE AS PER ESTIMATE NO. 61,912 MICK O'REGAN
26399		31-May-02	ROBERT MORGAN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & ROAD SAFETY	4,950.00	CONDUCTING A ROAD SAFETY AUDIT OF ROADS, EASEMENTS & DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CLARSON DISTRICT CENTRE INCLUDING DISCUSSIONS DAYTIME & NIGHT INSPECTIONS
26400		31-May-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	341.00	REFILL GUTTER BROOM SEGMENTS
26401		31-May-02	STIRLING CONCRETE PTY LTD	12,774.30	INSTALL & CONCRETE F/PATH FRANGIPANI PK
26402		31-May-02	IAIN SUMMERLIN	192.50	SUBSEQUENT AUDIOLOGICAL ASSESS
26403		31-May-02	SOUTHERN SCENE	2,607.88	PURCHASE OF VARIOUS BOOKS FOR LIBRARIES
26404		31-May-02	SWIM AUSTRALIA	1,144.00	2ND NATIONAL LEARN TO SWIM SEMINAR TOUR - 2002 FOR 13 STAFF MEMBERS
26405		31-May-02	BROTHER OF LIFE SKATE MINISTRY	660.00	HIRE OF SKATE RAMP & OUT OF METRO FUEL CHARGE
26406		31-May-02	SEAT ADS	682.00	TWO SEATS PAINTED & DELIVERED TO ASHBY DEPOT
26407		31-May-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	19,155.96	PABX CHARGES & RANGERS MOBILE SERVICES
26408		31-May-02	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	128.85	PETTY CASH
26409		31-May-02	WATER CORPORATION	1,727.50	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL SUPPORT, WANN ADMIN CTRE WATER CHARGES
26410		31-May-02	WESTERN POWER	24,743.55	COMM SVCS FINANCIAL SUPPORT & CHARGES ON VARIOUS PARKS, CENTRES & OFFICES
26411		31-May-02	WANNEROO TAVERN	102.15	PREMIUM LIGHT STUBBIES, SOVERIGN LAGER/HAHN STUBBS
26412		31-May-02	WANNEROO DRY CLEANERS	10.00	DRYCLEANING OF FIRE UNIFORMS
26413		31-May-02	WESTCARE CENTRAL SAFETY	304.31	RED YARRAVILLE POLO SHIRT WITH POCKET AND WANNEROO LOGO FRONT AND BACK SIZE 2XL
26414		31-May-02	B WEST0N	60.00	CLEANING OF ABORIGINAL SENIORS HALL
26415		31-May-02	YANCHEP LIBRARY PETTY CASH	62.80	PETTY CASH
50000293		01-May-02	JOANNE GAFF	500.00	PAYROLL
50000294		01-May-02	LEE GEORGE	244.14	PAYROLL
50000295		01-May-02	BILL MILES	427.28	PAYROLL
50000296		06-May-02	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	162,289.05	PAYROLL DED F/E 26/4/02
50000297		06-May-02	TERRY LOFTUS	470.32	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE
50000298		15-May-02	TRISTAN BRYUN	833.44	PAYROLL
50000299		15-May-02	RAY BUTLER	272.86	PAYROLL
50000300		16-May-02	IAN GOODENOUGH	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000301		16-May-02	MAUREEN GRIERSON	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000302		16-May-02	JUDITH HUGHES	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000303		16-May-02	JON KELLY	8,000.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000304		16-May-02	TERRY LOFTUS	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000305		16-May-02	GLYNIS MONKS	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000306		16-May-02	LOUISE MCNAMARA	2,223.01	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000307		16-May-02	LYNN O'GRADY	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000308		16-May-02	RUDI STEFFENS	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000309		16-May-02	JOHN STEWART	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000310		16-May-02	BRETT TREBY	2,500.00	MONTHLY & 2002-03 TELECOMM ALLOWANCE
50000311		20-May-02	DIANE HAYES	10,361.68	PAYROLL
50000312		20-May-02	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	157,808.80	PAYROLL DED F/E 10/5/02
50000313		21-May-02	FIONA STOCK	90.65	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000314		21-May-02	MELANIE BROWNE	187.88	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000315		23-May-02	ELIZABETH LEE	160.00	PAYROLL
50000316		30-May-02	MELANIE BROWNE	111.65	IN-HOME CARE SALARY
50000317		30-May-02	FIONA STOCK	178.46	IN-HOME CARE SALARY
50000318		30-May-02	DAVID GREEN	108.74	PAYROLL
50000319		30-May-02	ROBERT RIDDELL	1,705.77	PAYROLL
50000320		30-May-02	ROBERT KENNEDY	47.95	PAYROLL
50000321		30-May-02	SHARON PARKER	145.49	PAYROLL
50000322		30-May-02	RAY CUMMINS	184.32	PAYROLL
50000323		30-May-02	DEBRA WRIGHT	56.00	PAYROLL
50000324		30-May-02	TONY VERTERAMO	49.81	PAYROLL
50000325		31-May-02	GREG MCDONALD	130.87	PAYROLL
50000326		31-May-02	SHARON PARKER	145.49	PAYROLL
50000327		31-May-02	EMMA ATKINSON	551.46	PAYROLL
50000328		31-May-02	TERRY LOFTUS	530.45	TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR MAY 2002
		Subtotal		3,267,878.13
LESS: CANCELLED CHEQUES
23633	28-Feb-02		NOVUS HOMES	-666.30
24684	05-Apr-02		HAZEL HUNN	-350.76
24962	11-Apr-02		SOILAND GARDEN SUPPLIERS	-5,360.69
25102	18-Apr-02		PHILLIP R COPE	-345.00
25404	30-Apr-02		MODERN TEACHING AIDS P/L	-6,310.90
25411	30-Apr-02		MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	-111,729.56
25509	30-Apr-02		EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	-33,204.00
	Subtotal			-157,967.21
	Total Advance Account Recoup for May 2002			3,109,910.92

City of Wanneroo Municipal Account

Cheque		Date	Paid To	Amount	Details

172		14-May-02	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	1,367,851.67	RECOUP OF CHEQUE NO.: 25550 - 25769
					EFT DOC NO.: 50000293 - 50000297

173		25-May-02	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	1,014,785.01	RECOUP OF CHEQUE NO.: 25770 - 26065
					EFT DOC NO.: 50000298 - 50000314

174		06-Jun-02	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	727,274.24	RECOUP OF CHEQUE NO.: 26066 - 26415
					EFT DOC NO.: 50000315 - 50000328

			Sub Total	3,109,910.92


		Others

000172A		15-May-02	COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA	1,196.72	MERCHANT FEES
				119.68	GST ON MERCHANT FEES
				50.00	DISHONOURED CHEQUE
				110.69	EFTPOS FEES
				12.29	GST ON EFTPOS FEES
				636.36	GLF POOLING FEE
				63.64	GST ON GLF POOLING FEE
				80.00	QUICK CASH BAG FEES
				29,402.34	FDC SALARIES
				300,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				200,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				486,371.02	SALARIES- NET
				5,444.37	SALARIES- DEDUCTIONS
				63.64	GLF POOLING FEE
				636.36	GST ON GLF POOLING FEE

000173A		05-Jun-02	COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA	1,943.55	BPAY FEES
				1,613.54	QUICKLINE/ DMD FEES
				300,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				25,777.70	FDC SALARIES
				540,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				100,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				372.76	DISHONOURED CHEQUE
				280,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				485,324.73	SALARIES- NET
				5,439.27	SALARIES- DEDUCTIONS
				850,000.00	INVESTMENTS
				2.25	SALARIES RETURN FEE
				0.25	GST ON SALARIES RETURN FEE

			Sub Total	3,614,661.16

Total Municipal Account for May 2002				6,724,572.08

City of Wanneroo Town Planning Scheme Accounts

Cheque No.	Cheque Date		Paid To	Amount	Details

CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 1 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000021	05-Jun-02		BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	3,148.33	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

Cheque No.	Cheque Date	Paid To	Amount	Details
CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 2 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000017	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	1632.93	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 3 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000017	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	667.34	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 4 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000021	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	3,458.00	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197
CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 5 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000015	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	2307.30	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197
CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 6 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000019	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	4379.67	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 7 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000019	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	1136.43	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

CITY OF WANNEROO
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 8 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA
000015	05-Jun-02	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS	1758.21	INVOICES 1001230, 1001100 & 1001197

	Total Town Planning Schemes Bank Account		18,488.21

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CS02-07/02 Change In Rateable Status - Lot 415 Decourcey Way, Marangaroo -The Anglican Church Of Australia

File Ref: P19/0033V01

File Name: BBChainR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by A Binnie Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 10 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 10 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To advise Council that the property located at Lot 415 Decourcey Way, Marangaroo owned by The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth is not rateable.

Background

The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth has requested an exemption from rates for the property at Lot 415 Decourcey Way, Marangaroo on the basis that the land is used for ecclesiastical purposes, namely as a rectory.

The Diocese has owned the property since 7 September 2001, and has only recently sought approval from Council for the land to be considered not rateable.

Detail

The Local Government Act 1995 states that land which is used or held exclusively by a religious body as a place of residence of a minister of religion, is not rateable.

The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth has written to confirm that the property is used as a rectory. The use of the property as a rectory meets the above criteria.

Accordingly, the property is not rateable, effective from the date of ownership by The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

As rates have not been raised on the property since The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth acquired it and its not rateable status takes effect from the date of acquisition, there is no requirement to reverse any rates on the property.

Statutory Compliance

Section 6.26(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1995, provides that -

“The following land is not rateable land:

…land which is used or held exclusively by a religious body as a place of public worship or in relation to that public worship, a place of residence of a minter of religion,…”

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES that the land at Lot 415 Decourcey Way, Marangaroo, owned by The Anglican Church of Australia, Diocese of Perth is not rateable effective from 7 September 2001.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CS03-07/02 Change In Rateable Status - Lot 365 Lumsden Road, Wangara, West Coast Christian Outreach Centre

File Ref: P33/0024 VO1

File Name: BBChainR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by A Binnie Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 10 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 10 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To advise Council that the property located at Lot 365 Lumsden Road, Wangara, owned by Modular Metals Pty Ltd and leased to the West Coast Christian Outreach Centre is not rateable.

Background

In March 2002, the West Coast Christian Outreach Centre wrote to the City seeking an exemption from rates for the property at Lot 365 Lumsden Road, Wangara on the basis that the land is used by the congregation for religious and charitable purposes.

The congregation had leased the property since 1 March 2002 from Modular Metals Pty Ltd, and is seeking approval from Council for the land to be considered as not rateable. Previously, the congregation operated at sites in Kingsley and Greenwood and had received a partial rating concession for each site from the former City of Wanneroo and more recently the City of Joondalup. The partial concession excluded the area being used as a Skate Park.

The City responded in April 2002 that the request for rate exemption was not granted as at that time the congregation was operating a Skate Park as a commercial business from the premises. Therefore the premises were not being used solely for either religious or charitable purposes and did not qualify for not rateable status under Section 6.26(2) of the Local Government Act.

The City has now been informed that as from 6 May 2002, the Skate Park was closed and has now been converted to a Youth Centre, which is free of charge to those wishing to avail themselves of this facility. The Pastor cited declining numbers attending the Skate Park and rising public liability insurance premiums as the reason for closing the skate facility.

City staff visited the Centre on 28 May 2002 to view the operations being carried out at Lot 365 Lumsden Road, Wangara to ensure that the use was of a charitable and religious purpose.

Detail

The Local Government Act 1995 states that land which is used or held exclusively by a religious body as a place of public worship or in relation to that public worship, or land used exclusively for charitable purposes is not rateable.

The Local Government Act 1995 also states that land does not cease to be used exclusively for a religious or charitable purpose if it is used occasionally for another purpose which is of a charitable or religious nature.

The West Coast Christian Outreach Centre has written to confirm that the Skate Park has ceased to operate from 6 May 2002. They have advised that they are a non-profit charitable organisation and that the premises are used as a place of public worship as well as for charitable purposes. They have also confirmed that a condition of the lease that the West Coast Christian Outreach Centre has with the owners of the property is that they are responsible for all rates and taxes on the property.

As the use of the premises now meets the above criteria, the property is not rateable.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

As the rates for the 2001/02 financial year have been paid in full by Modular Metals Pty Ltd, there is no requirement to reverse any rates on the property for the current financial year.

The not rateable status for the property would take effect from 1 July 2002.

Statutory Compliance

Section 6.26(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1995, provides that -

“The following land is not rateable land:

…land used or held exclusively by a religious body as a place of public worship or in relation to that public worship, ….”

Section 6.26(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1995, provides that –

“The following land is not rateable land:

…land used exclusively for charitable purposes.”

Section 6.26(6) of the Local Government Act 1995, provides that –

“Land does not cease to be used exclusively for a purpose mentioned in subsection (2) merely because it is used occasionally for another purpose which is of a charitable, benevolent, religious or public nature.”

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES that the land at Lot 365 Lumsden Road, Wangara, owned by Modular Metals Pty Ltd and leased to the West Coast Christian Outreach Centre is not rateable effective from 1 July 2002.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CS04-07/02 Quinns Rocks Caravan Park - Residential Tenancy Agreement

File Ref: P/0009V01

File Name: CAQuiRoc.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 27 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by John Paton Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by John Paton Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To provide a status report on the review of the management of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park.

Background

A detailed report (CS09-04/02) on the ongoing operation of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park was presented to the Council meeting dated 30 April 2002. As a result, the following resolution was adopted:

“That the Council:

1. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to advertise for a Management Contract for the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park for a term of five (5) years;

2. RESOLVES that a Master Plan be prepared with reference to the guidelines identified in the Structure Plan for Lot 211 Mindarie, to detail the two stage, minor and major improvements required at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park and anticipated schedule of works;

3. ENDORSES the plan to reduce the number of permanent residents at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park to a maximum of 60% of the total sites and allocates each site in the front row to short stay immediately upon the existing residents(s) vacating their respective sites; and

4. ALLOWS the long term permanent residents of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park to remain in occupation of their current site, subject to:

a) the caravans and their surrounds being brought up to a good standard of repair and presentation, as determined by the Management of the Caravan Park, within two years, and that this standard is to be maintained at all times whilst the residents(s) occupy the site;

b) the understanding that this arrangement may be terminated in the event of circumstances beyond the reasonable control of Council, which preclude the area from being occupied;

c) the understanding that this privilege is not transferable, expiring at the point at which the existing residents vacate the site;

d) the arrangement being reviewed by Council in 9 years 11 months;

e) all residents will enter into a tenancy agreement with City of Wanneroo describing all conditions and terms above.”

Detail

As a consequence of the 30 April 2002 Council resolution, a number of actions have been initiated:

Management Contract

Tender specifications for a five-year Management Contract of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park have been prepared and are currently being finalised. These will include a draft agreement outlining the proposed scope of work and responsibilities of the Manager. It is anticipated that this tender will be advertised in July, for presentation at the August Council meeting.

As the current lease expires on 30 June 2002, the Lessees have been advised that in accordance with the lease provisions, a week-by-week extension will be granted on the existing terms.

Long Term Permanent Residents

In order to ascertain eligibility for the Residential Tenancy Agreement, a questionnaire was forwarded to the Caravan Park Lessee on 10 May 2002, for distribution to all residents. The questionnaire outlined the Council decision and requested the provision of information to support their application as an eligible long-term resident.

As a result of this process, thirty four (34) applications were received. After assessing the applications, it is considered that twenty three (23) meet the eligibility criteria as a long-term permanent resident due to their term in the caravan park.

Resident of caravan park prior to 1990	4
Resident of caravan between 1990 and 1995	7
Resident of caravan between 1996 and 1997	4
Resident of caravan between 1998 and 1999	8
Sub Total	23
Moved into caravan park in 2000	4
Moved into caravan park in 2001	3
Total	30

The other four applications are not considered to be eligible on the following grounds:

1. The site (No. 9) was occupied in 1990, however the owners do not live on site permanently.

2. The resident purchased the caravan (No. 22) in 1997, however he has only lived permanently on-site for the last few months.

3. The resident purchased the caravan (No. 8) in October 1999, however since June 2001, the resident has lived with a daughter whilst another daughter occupied the caravan. The resident does propose to return to the caravan park.

4. Resident moved into the caravan park in May 2001 with another family member. In April 2002, the resident purchased a caravan on another site (No. 61) and moved in.

There are currently a further twelve (12) permanent caravans on-site, however none of these are eligible due to the following circumstances:

· owned/controlled by Lessee and available for short term rent 5

· caravans occupied on a semi-permanent basis 4

· residents intend to move in near future 3

In accordance with the Council resolution to “allow the long term permanent residents of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park to remain in occupation of their current site” it is proposed to offer each of the twenty three (23) permanent residents that have been residents of the caravan park prior to 2000, the opportunity to enter into a formal Residential Tenancy Agreement. These non-transferable agreements will be for nine years and eleven months and will provide security over their existing site for the period of the lease.

Caravan Park Fees and Charges

With the city taking control of the caravan park, it is necessary to review the appropriate schedule of fees and list them in the annual budget for 2002/03. Attachment 1 compares the current fees at Quinns Rocks against other relevant caravan parks.

It would appear that the current charges at the caravan park are competitive, therefore only minor changes are proposed. The following fees and charges are recommended for listing in the 2002/03 annual budget.

	PEAK		OFF PEAK		Other charges
	Night	Week	Night	Week

Tent site (unpowered)	$17.00	$102.00	$17.00	$102.00
Standard site - unpowered	$19.00	$114.00	$17.00	$102.00
Standard site - powered	$21.50	$129.00	$19.50	$117.00
Permanent Residents - single		$60.00		$60.00
Permanent Residents - double		$65.00		$65.00
Use of washing machines					$2.00
Extra people - children					$2.50/night
Extra people - adults					$5.00/night

Notes:
Standard charge applies for up to two persons per site
Permanent Resident sites are sub metered and charged for electricity consumption

Master Plan

Once it has been confirmed which residents have accepted the lease, then detailed planning can commence on the development of the Master Plan for the overall upgrade of the caravan park. This plan will identify those sites occupied permanently and how the improvements can be undertaken systematically in other areas of the caravan park, including the public amenities.

Those residents who are ineligible for the Residential Tenancy Agreement will be advised that they may have to remove or if possible, relocate their caravan at some stage in the future to facilitate the improvements. These residents will retain the existing level of security offered by the Residential Tenancy Act, requiring the provision of 60 days notice. Every endeavour will be made to keep all residents informed of the plans and provide appropriate notice to minimise disruption and inconvenience.

Comment

The current caravan park fees are understood to have been unchanged for two years and the minor increase proposed is considered to be reasonable given the level of expenditure that will be incurred over the next few years to undertake the necessary improvements.

Whilst concerns have been expressed by some of the residents regarding the non-transferable nature of the proposed lease, it is generally accepted that it will provide them with an enhanced level of security, as they no longer face the risk of being asked to remove or relocate their caravans.

Given the number of sites occupied by residents under a lease agreement, of which seven (7) are on the front row, then it should be possible to develop an effective Master Plan that systematically upgrades sections of the caravan park. The plan will concentrate initially on amending the layout to ensure all design regulations are complied with. This will be effected by initially upgrading empty sites and then progressively looking at those occupied by on-site vans and those owned by semi-permanent residents.

Subsequent to the Council Briefing meeting held on 25 June 2002, the owner of the caravan on site No 8 was interviewed to confirm the circumstances involved in her tenancy and to seek any additional information that may support her application for a Residential Tenancy Agreement. As a result of this discussion, the following points are considered relevant:

· the applicant moved into a caravan on site No.15 in October 1999. At the end of that year, she then purchased the caravan on site No. 8.

· the applicant has advised that she does not own any other property.

· in August 2001 the applicant stopped living permanently at the caravan when she went to stay with a daughter. This was intended to be short term until approximately March 2002.

· a report was submitted to the Council meeting held on 27 November 2001 (CS09-11/01), detailing the intent of a 5 Year Residential Tenancy Agreement that was being drafted. The report also advised that a search of the Western Australian Electoral Commission identified eighteen residents who could be classified as “Permanents” as they were using the caravan park as their enrolled address. The Council therefore authorised that the Permanent residents be offered a lease.

· a copy of the draft lease was circulated (on a non-committal basis) to the permanent residents for their consideration, however the Applicant was not given a copy as she was not at that point living at the caravan park permanently.

· whilst the Applicant has been away, another daughter has lived in the caravan for a substantial period of the time.

· the Applicant has not moved back into the caravan, but intends to do this as soon as possible. The long-term intention of the Applicant is to register for State Housing, but this could take several years.

As the Applicant has not resided permanently on site for the past 10 months, she is not deemed to be eligible for a Residential Tenancy Agreement on the basis of being a long-term permanent resident. In addition, as the Agreements are not transferable, even if she had of qualified earlier, it would have extinguished when she ceased being a permanent resident. This does not however stop her from moving back into the caravan park and living there permanently. She, along with any other ‘semi permanent’ resident would need to be aware that the City may at some stage in the future if deemed necessary to facilitate the scheduling of works, request her to relocate to another site.

Statutory Compliance

Imposition of fees and charges

Section 6.16 of the Local Government Act empowers the Council to impose and recover a fee or charge for any goods or service it provides. Subsection 3 specifies that the fees and charges are to be imposed when adopting the annual budget.

Leasing

Under Section 30(2)(g) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, the leasing of residential property is deemed to be an ‘exempt disposition’ and therefore not bound by the requirements of Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

It is anticipated that the levying of the fees as proposed will result in an annual income of approximately $165,000 less management and on-costs. The surplus funds from the operation will be placed in a Reserve fund to facilitate the staged upgrade of the property and its facilities.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. DETERMINE that eligible long term permanent residents of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park are those that have enjoyed permanent residence status for a period extending prior to 2000; and

2. AUTHORISE the Chief Executive Officer to offer a Residential Tenancy Agreement to each of the twenty three (23) eligible long term permanent residents of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park that have been residents prior to 2000.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CS05-07/02 Insurance Services For 2002/03

File Ref: S/0036V01

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

File Name: CATenNoA.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 20 June 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Evaluation of Insurance Services for the period of one (1) year from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003.

Background

At its meeting held on 13 June 2000 (LR01-06/00), the Council considered tenders for the provision of Motor Vehicle Insurance services. As one submission was nonconforming and the other deemed excessive, the Council resolved to reject the tenders and authorised the Director of Corporate Services to investigate insurance options through the WAMA Local Government Insurance Services.

As a result, the Municipal Insurance Broking Service (MIBS) on behalf of the City of Wanneroo, submitted an offer for the plant & vehicles insurance from Zurich Australia, and property insurance from the CGU insurance Group. These offers were a result of MIBS approaching the respondents to the MIBS public advertisement of 20 May 2000 requesting insurance underwriting services for 13 other local governments.

The Council accepted the tendered prices from Zurich Australia and CGU Insurance Group at its meeting held on 27 June 2000 (LR02-06/00) for the period 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001. MIBS called for tenders the subsequent year and the Council again approved the tenders submitted by Zurich Australia and CGU Insurance Group for the period 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002 at the Council meeting held on 3 July 2002 (W260-07/01).

Detail

The insurance market is going through an upward spiral, which has been compounded by the demise of major insurance groups, world events and apparent increase in the incidence of liability claims. This has resulted in substantial increases in premiums, deductibles and restrictions in cover.

The Local Government Insurance Services, which comprises Municipal Insurance Broking Services (MIBS), Municipal WorkCare Scheme and the Municipal Liability Scheme was established by the WA Local Government Association to seek and develop strategies to provide the best value insurances to local governments. In view of the current environment, they have now formed the Municipal Property Scheme, which incorporates the Industrial Special Risks, Electronic Equipment, Machinery Breakdown and Multi-Risk/General Property policies in an attempt to insulate Councils from the present insurance market conditions.

In accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act, MIBS called tenders on behalf of the City of Wanneroo and a number of other Councils for Motor Vehicle and Industrial Special Risks insurance cover.

Motor Vehicle

Tenders were advertised by MIBS on Saturday 18 May 2002, closing Tuesday 4 June 2002 in respect of Motor Vehicle & Plant insurance cover for the 2002/03 financial year. This process resulted in the following two tenders being received:

SGIO Insurance Premium $122,968 plus GST

Zurich Insurance Premium $114,286 plus GST (includes Fire Service Levy - $1,131)

In evaluating the tenders, it was identified that the policy offered by Zurich is more extensive, with SGIO excluding some key areas, including cover for Bushfire Brigade, volunteers, Councillors and Employees vehicles (when used on Council business) and tools of trade.

The tender from Zurich represents an increase of $34,267 (43%) over the equivalent premium for 2001/02. It should be noted however that the proposed premium is based on a plant value of $10,876,685 as opposed to $8,672,402 for the same period last year. The current plant value includes a component for eight (8) trucks that are on order that have a net increase in value over the traded vehicles of $1,679,719. This represents approximately 25% of the premium increase.

Industrial Special Risk

The new Municipal Property Scheme is to operate as a ‘pool’ scheme, with the first $2.5m in claims in any claim period being self-funded from within the pool (premium pool). In the event that claims experience across all policy holders exceeds $2.5m, then this is covered by re-insurance through a nominated group of insurance companies. These companies include:

§ Zurich

§ ACE

§ Allianz

§ AIG

Although MIBS advertised a tender for the provision of Industrial Special Risks insurance cover for the City of Wanneroo, no submissions were received from the market. Whilst it was expected that the re-insurance companies (listed above) would not tender, there was the potential for other insurance companies to submit proposals.

In view of the situation, MIBS have confirmed that cover can be provided through their Municipal Property Scheme for 2002/03 financial year at a cost of $238,621. This is an increase of $62,145 (35%) over the equivalent premium for 2001/02. We are advised that this increase is consistent across local government, with some councils experiencing higher increases due to claims history.

Public Liability/Professional Indemnity

The current market conditions for Public Liability and Professional Indemnity have led to significant rises in premiums worldwide and in many instances, restrictions on cover. The Municipal Liability Scheme can limit percentage increases to a certain degree, however they are still affected by re-insurance costs.

The formula for calculating premiums is based on the total operating revenue of the City as a percentage of the total contribution pool, multiplied by a factor for the incurred loss ratio and risk profile. As a result, the premium for the City of Wanneroo for 2002/03 has been set at $235,570, which is an increase of $79,810 (51%).

Comment

In view of the current environment, it is considered that the process employed by the Local Government Insurance Service in utilising a combination of pool insurance and consolidating the remaining insurances on a product line basis with specialist re-insurers achieves economies of scale, thereby limiting the effects of the hardening market.

Whilst significant increases in premiums are proposed, they are consistent across local government and considered reasonable against the wider community. In view of this, it is recommended that the City of Wanneroo renew their insurances to 30 June 2003 with the Local Government Insurance Service, with the exception of Motor Vehicle cover, which is to be serviced by Zurich Insurance.

Statutory Compliance

The tender for the provision of Motor Vehicle Insurance was undertaken in accordance with the provisions of section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.

The Council is not required to tender for the services provided by the Local Government Insurance Service as Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, section 11 (2) states that:

“Tenders do not have to be publicly invited according to the requirements of this section if-

(b) the supply of the goods or services is to be obtained through the Council Purchasing Service of WAMA.”

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

To obtain adequate insurance cover for the Council’s operations in the 2002/03 financial year, a significant increase in funding is required to be provided in the budget, as detailed below:-

Insurance Policy	2001/02	2002/03	Increase ($)	%
Motor Vehicle	80,019	114,286	34,267	43%
Industrial Special Risks	176,476	238,621	62,145	35%
Public Liability	155,760	235,570	79,810	51%
Total	412,255	588,477	176,222	42%
Other	8,132	TBA

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. ACCEPT the tender submitted by Zurich Australian Insurance Limited in the amount of $114,286.55 plus GST, for Insurance Underwriting Services for Motor Vehicle Insurance for the City of Wanneroo, for a period of one year from 30 June 2002 to 30 June 2003; and

2. ACCEPTS the proposal of the Local Government Insurance Services for their ‘pool’ schemes (Municipal Workcare, Municipal Property and Municipal Liability) and confirms membership of those schemes for the 2002/03 financial year.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Community Development

CD01-07/02 Alexander Heights Community Facility

File Ref: 02518W

File Name: AAAleHei.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 27 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Approval for concept plans for the redevelopment of the Alexander Heights Community Hall and approval to go to tender.

Background

The Alexander Heights Senior Citizens Club (Inc.) (AHSCC) approached Council with regard to a purpose built facility being constructed to suit the needs of the AHSCC. In the first instance, the AHSCC requested that additions be made to the existing community hall at Alexander Heights. The City agreed to investigate the AHSCC proposal for extensions to the existing community hall.

In an effort to ensure community consultation was undertaken to underpin the process Community Services prepared a report to Council. At its meeting of 25 September 2001 Council resolved to establish the Alexander Heights Community Facility Advisory Committee (AHCFAC, reference report CD05-09/01), with the aim of “provid(ing) input in an advisory capacity on the development of additional community facilities in the suburb of Alexander Heights”. The committee is comprised of the Mayor, the two ward Councillors for the area, two representatives from the AHSCC and representatives from the City’s administration. The other main user group of the current facilities, the Alexander Heights Playgroup, has also been consulted with regard to the redevelopment of the facility.

Detail

The Committee has met four times to discuss options for the redevelopment of the existing Community Hall. After taking into account input from key stakeholders, a concept plan has been developed that meets each group’s requirements (Attachment 1). Please see below for further details on the consultation process.

Consultation

The Alexander Heights Community Facility Advisory Committee was formed to look at the issue. This Committee met on a number of occasions to consider the needs and input of key stakeholders, in order to provide a recommendation to Council on the redevelopment of community facilities in Alexander Heights.

On 22 January 2002, the Committee was involved in a bus tour of similar existing facilities in the northern metropolitan area.

Facilities visited include the Adam Spagnolo Community Centre in Osborne Park, the Scarborough Community Centre in Scarborough, the Whitfords Senior Citizen’s Club in Whitfords and the Banksia Grove Community Centre in Banksia Grove. The aim of this tour was to expose the Committee to a number of different designs and uses with regard to community facilities, and proved to be very informative in the preparation of the concept plan.

The AHSCC has strong representation on this committee, and has been able to have input at every stage of the process, including a submission on what the AHSCC requires in any new or refurbished facility. A meeting was held with the AHSCC on 9 May 2002 to discuss the concept plan with the broader group. This meeting resulted in unanimous support from members of the Club for the proposed concept plan.

Additionally, the City met with the Alexander Heights Playgroup on 10 June 2002. This meeting allowed the Playgroup to have significant input into the concept plan. As a result consideration has been given to vinyl flooring and the provision of a suitable playground area, as well as a change table and child’s toilet. These requirements did not compromise the wishes of the AHSCC; rather the requirements of both main users were seen to be complimentary.

Comment

The main issues examined by the Committee include the location of the proposed new facility, the design of the proposed new facility and the requirements of potential user groups of the proposed new facility. The issue of whether a new facility should be constructed or additional facilities refurbished was also a major focus of the Committee.

Whilst a new facility may fully meet the needs of one particular group, it is unclear what benefits such a development would have for other sectors of the local community, or if indeed a complete new facility is required. Certainly the current facility is not fully utilised and this leads to concern that, should a new facility be constructed, utilisation rates of the existing facility would fall dramatically, with the effect that a major asset of the City would sit idle for much of the time.

The location of any new facility has proven to be problematic. Whilst the land in question is Crown land vested in the City for community purposes, the site has long been proposed as the location for a future library. This issue was flagged as early as 6 September 2001, in a meeting with representatives from AHSCC.

It would not appear appropriate for the City to proceed with the construction of a new facility on land previously identified for a future library before ascertaining the requirement for a library on that site, and the requirement for a new facility to be constructed in the first instance.

The redevelopment of existing facilities avoids these concerns. Further, the redevelopment option is less costly than constructing a new facility, by reducing duplication of infrastructure, and allows for the inclusions of “extras” that would not be possible in a new facility. For example, the inclusion of a wheelchair lift to the stage. Annual operating costs are also minimised with only one building to manage and maintain.

The redevelopment option also allows for a broader range of requirements to be met. The redevelopment option includes redeveloped playground facilities, changing and child toilet facilities as well as catering for the needs of Seniors. This is more in keeping with the philosophy of a community facility, rather than a purpose built facility for a particular group.

The option of redevelopment will encourage interaction between user groups. For example, the Seniors group and the Playgroup have already agreed to share any refurbished facility for some periods. This intergenerational linkage is seen as highly desirable and is encouraged by the City.

Redevelopment also means that any future library site is preserved, avoids possible parking problems caused by the need to increase the number of bays to service a new building and allows for the completion of landscaping and signage works around existing facilities. It also supports the development of better integration between existing facilities, the local shopping centre and the refurbished facility.

As a result of all these considerations the AHCFAC has recommended the concept plan SK4 (please see Attachment 1).

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

There are a number of strategic implications with regard to the development of this facility, relevant to Goal Two: Healthy Communities. The issues can be broadly categorised as follows:

1. Goal 2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs in the present and future.

The City has not resolved the question of whether a library is required on the site designated for the purpose. To build a new facility on this site without considering future library needs could leave the City in a difficult position should it be determined in the future that the site was indeed the most appropriate site for a library.

2. Goal 2.2 Provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.

As above.

3. Goal 2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.

4. Goal 2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity and Goal 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

A total of $800,000.00 has been budgeted for this project. Cost estimates for the construction of a new building are $991,152.00. Cost estimates for the extension and redevelopment of existing facilities are estimated at $870,000.00.

At a total cost of $870,000 the extension and redevelopment of existing facilities cannot be accommodated within the existing project budget. However, Administration will work with the Committee to examine reductions in scope to allow the project to meet budget targets.

The design upon which these costings have been based would allow better connections between the existing buildings already on the site, not jeopardise future library developments and allow a more meaningful public view of the facility as a whole. Additionally, the plan to extend and refurbish still meets the needs as outlined by the AHSCC and the Playgroup, but for significantly less expenditure and the annual operating costs are minimised.

If the City chose to construct a new facility, it would need to seek external funding in order to complete the project. This process would impact significantly on the timeframes for completion of the project, and would also limit the City’s ability to meet all the needs outlined by AHSCC. For example, it is desired that a stage be included, with a lift to allow for easy access. The City would find it very difficult from a financial point of view to meet this request should a new facility be constructed, but is able to meet this requirement, within the current budget, under the plan to extend and refurbish the existing facility.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. AGREES in principle to the proposed redevelopment of the Alexander Heights Community Hall on reserve 43532 (Property Number 182859)) 18 Linto Way Alexander Heights, subject to the project cost not exceeding $800,000 and as outlined in concept plan SK4 (attached), which includes the following:

· Provision of a games room

· Provision of an equipped playground

· Provision of child’s toilet and change table

· Provision of kitchenette in meeting room

· Provision of stage and lift to stage

· Provision of additional storage space

· Provision of a dining area

· Provision of 2 additional craft rooms

· Provision of office space

· Increase number of toilets

· Provision of a BBQ courtyard

2. AUTHORISES the preparation of tender documentation and the calling of tenders for the construction of additions to the facility on reserve 43532 (Property Number 182859) 18 Linto Way, Alexander Heights.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CD02-07/02 The Future Provision Of HACC Funded Voluntary Transport Services

File Ref: 01075

File Name: AATheVol.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 20 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

The future provision of Home and Community Care (HACC) funded voluntary transport services within the City of Wanneroo.

Background

The City currently receives funding from the Department of Health for the following two discrete projects under the banner of the HACC program, Wanneroo HACC Services and Wanneroo Voluntary Services.

Wanneroo HACC Services includes:

· The City’s home support program;

· The adult day centre program; and

· Delivered meals.

Wanneroo Voluntary Services includes:

· A voluntary transport service, with the aim being to provide transport to and from medical appointments. This service has been in operation since the mid 1980s.

In 1996 non-recurrent HACC funds were provided by the Health Department to review HACC transport services in the North Metropolitan region. After extensive consultation with providers of HACC transport services and consumer groups in the North Metro region, a report titled “Review of HACC Transport Arrangements in the North Metropolitan Region (Bandt Gatter and Associates)” was submitted to the Aged and Continuing Care branch of the Health Department of WA (HDWA). The core recommendation arising from this report was to trial a Transport Brokerage Service in the North Metro region (HACC Program – North Metropolitan Brokerage Service Pilot Bulletin [undated]).

Detail

The HACC Transport Project, as it is now known, has completed its formal evaluation phase and the City has been approached by the Department of Health to transfer the delivery of all voluntary transport services funded by HACC to the HACC Transport Project.

The service as provided by the City currently operates with two Mitsubishi Magna station wagons, originally purchased with HACC funding. These vehicles are driven by volunteer drivers and are used for the purpose of transporting HACC eligible clients to and from medical appointments.

The City employs an Administration Officer to undertake booking and scheduling duties for the program, as well as liaison with transport volunteers. This position is currently part time, at 30 hours per week.

The City is currently under contract to provide 216 one-way trips per month. The impact of the additional HACC Transport Program service has seen the number of clients utilising the service provided by the City decrease markedly, to the point where the City is finding it extremely difficult to meet contract requirements. Indeed a number of people who previously utilised the City’s service now utilise the HACC Transport Program. This issue is further explored in the comments section of this document.

Additionally, the City is finding it difficult to recruit and maintain drivers, due to a range of factors. These can be best summarised as follows:

· Inadequate resources to properly manage volunteers in terms of ongoing support;

· Confusion over whether there is a requirement for volunteers to hold an ‘F’ class licence; and

· An increase in volunteering opportunities on a broad statewide basis.

Other service providers in the region, such as Community Vision Inc, have already agreed to allow the HACC Transport Program to provide all transport services previously provided by Community Vision Inc.

The HACC Transport Program operates utilising taxi drivers under a strict performance based contract. This contract ensures quality service provision, and is clear in its expectations of taxi drivers who take part in the program.

Consultation

The City embarked on a significant consultation process with regard to this proposal. Prior to the advertising of the consultation period for public comment, the City wrote to all clients who had utilised the voluntary service in the last 12 months, and all volunteers involved in the provision of the service. This was to allow key stakeholders the most amount of time possible to consider the issue. The City provided information on the proposal (Attachment 1) as well as a feedback form and information on other avenues to have input. City staff conducted home visits where requested by clients to assist in explaining the information and completing the feedback forms.

The City also organised to meet with volunteers involved in the provision of the service. This meeting took place on 20 May 2002, and the comments made by volunteers at this meeting are attached to this report (Attachment 2). Further examination of the feedback received from volunteers is contained in the comments section of this report.

The City issued a press release on May 9 and a Community Consultation Program was advertised in the Wanneroo Times of May 14 2002. This consultation program ran for 28 days and closed on June 10 2002. The City also organised a public meeting to discuss the issue, held on 27 May 2002 (for minutes - see Attachment 3).

Information sheets and feedback forms were also located in the reception area of the New Civic Centre to encourage the general public to have their say.

Additionally, the City wrote to all Senior Citizens Clubs as potential future users of the service, and to local community based groups likely to be effected by any changes to services, encouraging their feedback.

The City received a total of 79 responses to the proposal to transfer responsibility for the delivery of HACC funded voluntary transport services to the HACC Transport Program, a response rate of approximately 38%. These are outlined in the table below:

Table (1): Results of Consultation – All Responses

SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL	DO NOT SUPPORT THE PROPSAL	UNSURE
48.71%	21.80%	29.49%

Total responses received: 79

Comment

The issue of the provision of voluntary transport is extremely sensitive and emotive and must be handled as such by the City. There certainly appears to be significant advantages for the City, and clients of the voluntary transport service, should the service be provided entirely by HACC. These are summarised below:

Table (2): Advantages and Disadvantages of Proposed Changes to Voluntary Transport Services

ADVANTAGES	DISADVANTAGES
Flexibility and range of service	Significant cost increase for short trips
Cost reduced on long trips	Question of what alternative work will be available for existing volunteers
Broader range of trip types offered
Resolves “F” class licence issues
Represents a co-ordinated metropolitan wide approach
HACC Transport Project (HTP) can respond in shorter timeframe than the City of Wanneroo service
A hoist vehicle is available with the HTP
Many City of Wanneroo clients already choose the HTP
City of Wanneroo service has difficulty meeting current targets

It would appear that the HACC Transport Program represents a more appropriate use of the resources available to provide HACC transport services. It is a fact that many HACC funded vehicles sit idle during much of the day in some areas, whereas other areas are unable to meet demand. Additionally, the HACC Transport Program takes a metropolitan wide approach. This helps to iron out inconsistencies that have arisen in funding between different regions that resulted in some regions being over serviced whilst others were comparatively poorly served.

Clients

Clients are clearly key stakeholders in any proposals revolving around voluntary transport, and their views have been carefully considered in the preparation of this report. As previously noted, all clients who had utilised the service in the last twelve months were written to, inviting them to have feedback and to post this feedback in pre-paid envelopes. Officers from Community Services also made follow up home visits where requested by clients, to assist in explaining the information and to assist in completing a feedback form if so desired by the client.

It is pertinent to note that over 50% of clients indicated they had already utilised the HACC Transport Program. Of these, 89.20% indicated they were either very satisfied or satisfied with the service they received.

Of those who had used the City’s Voluntary Transport service, 100% were either very satisfied or satisfied.

It is clear from the consultation results that most clients supported the proposal. Indeed, when examining only those responses gained from clients the results show a slightly higher level of support than the results of the broader consultation. This is shown in the table below:

Table (3): Results of Consultation – Client Responses Only

SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL	DO NOT SUPPORT THE PROPSAL	UNSURE
50.72%	20.29%	28.99%

Total responses received from clients only: 70

Comments on Client Feedback

Of those clients who did not support or were unsure about the proposal, approximately 20.59% (or 7 responders) cited increased fees as a reason.

The two main reasons given for not supporting the proposal were familiarity with the existing service and the loss of personal service provided by volunteers.

With regard to volunteers, it is recognised that the HACC Transport Program will not utilise volunteers as drivers. However, volunteers still have a very important role to play, a role that recognises that the true value for many clients is the companionship and support that the volunteers provide, more so than the provision of transport. The HACC Transport Program allows for these extremely valuable skills to be available to clients of its service, by building a pool of volunteers attached to the Program. Clients would then be able to request a volunteer to accompany them to their appointment.

It is true to say that taxi drivers will not be able to provide the same level of support as volunteers. However, volunteers will be available to undertake all the important supports that have been identified by clients. Additionally, the City is able to work with the HACC Transport Program and volunteers, to assist volunteers to join the HACC Transport Program if they so desire and to assist in the maintenance of links with existing clients of the Wanneroo service who transfer to the program.

Of those clients who supported the proposal, the most common reason given was flexibility of service. Clients valued the ability to access services after hours and on weekends, and the fact they are able to use the service for activities other than medical appointments. For example, some respondents indicated how valuable it was to them to be able to access a service that allowed them to visit their spouse in a nursing home.

Volunteers

Another key stakeholder group in this service is the volunteers who act as drivers for clients receiving the service. When examining only those responses received from volunteers, it can be seen that the results are much less clear than in either client only responses, or the broader results. This is indicated in the table below:

Table (4): Results of Consultation – Volunteer Responses Only

SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL	DO NOT SUPPORT THE PROPSAL	UNSURE
33.33%	33.33%	33.33%

Total responses received from volunteers only: 9

An important issue to consider is the future of volunteers who have been involved in the transport program, some for many years. Whilst these volunteers have provided an invaluable service as volunteer drivers, there are many other volunteering opportunities within the City that are available. Some examples include volunteer drivers required for the City’s Community Transport Program (a Council funded service completely separate to HACC funded voluntary transport), assistants within the City’s Adult Day Centre program, visitors within the City’s home visiting program and volunteers to assist people with shopping.

Additionally, there are volunteering opportunities within the HACC Transport Program. The HACC Transport Program is aware that many clients have built significant relationships over time with their volunteers, and enjoy the company and support that these volunteers provide. It is also recognised that it is not always possible for taxi drivers to provide this level of support. As a consequence the HACC Transport Program has a pool of volunteers available, who can be matched with clients. Should the client request a volunteer, the volunteer would simply meet the taxi at the client’s house, with the client, and then accompany the client on their appointment. There will be no charge to the volunteer or the client, for the volunteer, in this scenario.

It is proposed that Community Services staff will work closely with existing volunteers, to ensure that they are assisted to access any alternative volunteering duties that may be available. This would include working with current volunteers to see if they would like to volunteer in any of the City’s programs, but also assisting to access other volunteering opportunities, for example, through Volunteering WA.

It is also proposed that the City recognise past and present volunteers involved in the provision of voluntary transport services through a function. This provides the City with an opportunity to thank volunteers for their invaluable contribution to the community of the City of Wanneroo.

Changeover Process

Should Council endorse the recommendations contained within this report it will be crucial to manage the changeover process, both for clients and volunteers. This report has already outlined a support process for volunteers currently working within the program.

It is envisaged that the City will also need to support clients of the existing service through the change process. Whilst many clients have already utilised the HACC Transport Program, the City is able to identify and assist those who have not. This assistance would take the following forms:

1. Provision of contact and booking information for the HACC Transport Pilot;

2. Provision of written and verbal information on the HACC Transport Pilot;

3. Assistance to access financial counselling services should the HACC Transport Pilot require a client to provide financial information in order to receive a reduction or waiver of fees;

4. An examination of individual clients’ service provision to see if extra supports are required due to the transfer of the program; and

5. Advocacy and support.

Statutory Compliance

Nil.

Strategic Implications

The provision of transport services does fall within the City’s strategic plan, under Healthy Communities Goal 2.3, which states:

“Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network”.

It can be seen that the provision of voluntary transport through HACC would still meet this goal, even if the City does not directly provide the service.

Due to the fact that the HACC transport program is able to be more flexible than that offered by the City, it is apparent that the provision of the service through HACC would enhance the ability of the City to meet the following goals in its strategic plan:

· Goal 2.3: Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network;

· Goal 2.6: Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

City

For the 2001/2002 financial year, the City was provided with $56,000 in funding for Wanneroo Voluntary Services, to provide a total of 2,600 one-way trips. The City heavily subsidises this program at present, with a predicted operational deficit this year of $69,136.00, of which $43,970.00 is charged in corporate overheads. This compares with an operating deficit of $71,760.41 for the 2000/2001 financial year.

Additionally, the City will not lose this funding. Should the City determine to transfer responsibility for the delivery of the program to the HACC Transport Program, the Department of Health has offered to reallocate the $56,000 of funding currently in Wanneroo Voluntary Services into Wanneroo HACC Services. The City would negotiate with the Department of Health for the areas of service provision that would increase in outputs due to the additional $56,000.

The staff that are currently employed with the Voluntary Transport Program are still required for the operation of the City’s Community Transport Program, and within the HACC program in general. This is consistent with the requirements for the expenditure of the funding. Therefore, the continued employment of this Officer within the HACC program and utilising HACC funds is possible.

It is highly likely that the transfer for the responsibility of the delivery of HACC funded voluntary transport services will have a positive impact on the budgets within Aged and Disability Services. Although the City would be required to look at additional resources in order to achieve any negotiated increase in outputs in Wanneroo HACC Services, it is highly likely that such negotiations would not require the City to subsidise the program to the level the Voluntary Transport Program is currently subsidised. There are currently areas of the HACC program that would benefit from additional funds, and it is expected that at worst the transfer of the program would be cost neutral for the City.

There is also the question of the two Mitsubishi Magnas that are currently utilised to operate the service. The Department of Health have indicated in correspondence that these vehicles may be retained by the City, for use within the HACC program.

Clients

If the City transfers responsibility to the HACC Transport Program there will be a significant financial impact on some clients living in the City, as a result of the difference in fees charged. The City charges a flat fee of $2.00 for eligible clients to access the transport service, and an extra $1.50 per 10 kilometres travelled. The HACC Transport Program charges $4.00 per one-way trip for trips under 40km and $6.00 per one-way trip for journeys over 40km. Therefore, it is highly likely that many clients, who have previously been paying $2.00 per trip, will now be paying $8.00 per trip if it is a return journey. It is equally likely that some clients, who would have paid up to $25.00 per return trip under the City’s fee system, would now be charged a maximum of $12.00 for the same return journey.

It is important to note at this point that a fundamental principle of the HACC program is that no eligible individual can be denied a HACC service on the basis of not having the capacity to pay for that service (as opposed to a refusal to pay).

The HACC Transport Program has indicated that it will follow a process very similar to that operated by the City currently. That is, where a client claims an inability to pay, they are asked to support this claim through a visit to a financial counsellor. The City is able to assist clients to access such service free of charge.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. APPROVES the transfer for the responsibility for the provision of HACC funded voluntary transport services to the HACC Transport Program, to take effect from 1 September 2002;

2. APPROVES the expenditure of up to $500.00 from allocation 51.80.88.914.5131.0001 in order to hold a function to thank existing and past volunteer drivers;

3. WRITES to all existing and past volunteer drivers in recognition of their outstanding contribution to the City of Wanneroo community;

4. NOTES:

· that Community Services staff will liaise with volunteers to ensure they are assisted to access other volunteering opportunities if they so desire;

· that Community Services staff will work closely with clients to support them through the change process;

· that Community Services staff will negotiate with the Department of Health for the reallocation of funding to Wanneroo HACC Services funding currently allocated to Wanneroo Voluntary Services; and

· that a report will be presented to Council outlining the results of the above negotiations and seeking approval for delegation of authority for the Mayor and CEO to sign and affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo to the amended contract and to undertake appropriate budget amendments.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

INFORMATION SHEET – PROPOSED CHANGES TO HOME AND COMMUNITY CARE (HACC) FUNDED VOLUNTARY TRANSPORT SERVICE

OVERVIEW

The City has been approached by the Department of Health with regard to the future provision of voluntary transport services. Specifically, they have requested that such services be delivered by the Home and Community Care (HACC) Transport Project and no longer be delivered by the City.

The City currently receives funding from the Department of Health for two separate projects under the banner of the HACC program. These are Wanneroo HACC Services and Wanneroo Voluntary Services. Wanneroo HACC Services includes the City’s home support program, the adult day centre program and delivered meals. Wanneroo Voluntary Services is inclusive only of a voluntary transport service, with the main aim being to provide transport to and from medical appointments. This service has been in operation since the mid 1980s. This proposal DOES NOT AFFECT WANNEROO HACC SERVICES.

CURRENT SITUATION

The City has been approached by the Department of Health to transfer the delivery of all voluntary transport services funded by HACC to the HACC Transport Project.

The service as provided by the City currently operates with two Mitsubishi Magna station wagons, originally purchased with HACC funding. These vehicles are driven by volunteer drivers and are used primarily for the purpose of transporting HACC eligible clients to and from medical appointments.

The HACC Transport Program currently utilises taxis under a strictly monitored performance based contract. Literature about the service is included for information.

FINANCIAL IMPACTS

have paid up to $25.00 per return trip under the City’s fee system, would now be charged a maximum of $12.00 for the same return journey.

It is important to note at this point that a fundamental principle of the HACC program is that no eligible individual can be denied a HACC service on the basis of not having the capacity to

ATTACHMENT 1, P 2

pay for that service (as opposed to a refusal to pay). The HACC Transport Program has indicated that it will follow a process very similar to that operated by the City currently. That is, where a client claims an inability to pay, they are asked to support this claim through a visit to a financial counsellor.

Please find below 3 case studies that illustrate how services are currently provided, and how they would be provided under the proposal.

CASE STUDY (1)

Mrs Zed lives in Wanneroo, is confined to a wheelchair, and has a medical appointment at her local doctor’s surgery. The one-way journey is 3 kilometres i.e. a 6 kilometre return journey.

The City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport Service

Unless Mrs Zed could transfer from her wheelchair into the front seat of a vehicle, the City could not provide this service. Should Mrs Zed be able to be transferred, the following applies;

The City would require 2 full working days notice in order to provide transport;

The City could NOT provide transport after business hours, on the weekend or on public holidays;

Mrs Zed would telephone the City to make her booking. This booking would be confirmed over the telephone;

Mrs Zed would be collected by a volunteer driver in a City of Wanneroo vehicle and transported to the doctor’s surgery;

The volunteer would either wait for Mrs Zed or would go on another job before returning to pick up Mrs Zed and take her home, meaning a possible delay between the end of the appointment and the trip home;

Mrs Zed could take a carer with her at no charge;

The volunteer may or may not be able to stay with Mrs Zed, depending on other jobs booked

Total cost of this trip would be $2.00.

The HACC Transport Program (HTP)

The HTP is able to transport people confined to a wheelchair or scooter;

The HTP would require 1 full working day notice in order to provide transport;

The HTP could provide transport after business hours, on the weekend or on public holidays;

Mrs Zed would telephone the HTP to make her booking. This booking would be confirmed over the telephone;

Mrs Zed would be collected by a taxi driver in a taxi vehicle and transported to the doctor’s surgery;

Once her appointment was finished Mrs Zed would contact the HTP to arrange a pick up and return home;

Mrs Zed could take a carer with her at no charge;

A volunteer could be arranged to accompany Mrs Zed if required

Total cost of this trip would be $8.00.

Please note that for both services, the principle of not being denied a service on the basis of not being able to pay for it applies.

ATTACHMENT 1, P 3

CASE STUDY (2)

Mr Exx lives in Two Rocks and has a medical appointment at Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital.

The City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport Service

The City would require 2 full working days notice in order to provide transport;

The City could NOT provide transport after business hours, on the weekend or on public holidays;

Mr Exx would telephone the City to make his booking. This booking would be confirmed over the telephone;

Mr Exx would be collected by a volunteer driver in a City of Wanneroo vehicle and transported to SCGH;

The volunteer would either wait for Mr Exx or would go on another job before returning to pick up Mr Exx and take him home, meaning a possible delay between the end of the appointment and the trip home;

Mr Exx could take a carer with him at no charge;

The volunteer may or may not be able to stay with Mr Exx, depending on other jobs booked

Total cost of this trip would be approximately $21.00.

The HACC Transport Program (HTP)

The HTP would require 1 full working day notice in order to provide transport;

The HTP could provide transport after business hours, on the weekend or on public holidays;

Mr Exx would telephone the HTP to make his booking. This booking would be confirmed over the telephone;

Mr Exx would be collected by a taxi driver in a taxi vehicle and transported to SCGH;

Once his appointment was finished Mr Exx would contact the HTP to arrange a pick up and return home;

Mr Exx could take a carer with him at no charge;

A volunteer could be arranged to accompany Mr Exx if required

Total cost of this trip would be $12.00.

Please note that for both services, the principle of not being denied a service on the basis of not being able to pay for it applies.

CASE STUDY (3)

Mrs Why’s husband lives in a nursing home south of the river. Mrs Why would like to visit her husband for his birthday on a Saturday.

The City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport Service

The City would be unable to meet this request.

The HACC Transport Program (HTP)

The HTP would require 1 full working day notice in order to provide transport;

The HTP could provide transport after business hours, on the weekend or on public holidays;

Mrs Why would telephone the HTP to make her booking. This booking would be confirmed over the telephone;

ATTACHMENT 1, P 4

Mrs Why would be collected by a taxi driver in a taxi vehicle and transported to the nursing home;

Once his appointment was finished Mrs Why would contact the HTP to arrange a pick up and return home;

Mrs Why could take a carer with her at no charge;

A volunteer could be arranged to accompany Mrs Why if required

Total cost of this trip would be $12.00.

Please note that for both services, the principle of not being denied a service on the basis of not being able to pay for it applies.

STRATEGIC IMPACTS

Due to the fact that the HACC transport program is able to be more flexible than that offered by the City, it is apparent that the provision of the service through HACC has the potential to enhance the ability of the City to meet the following goals in its strategic plan:

Goal 2.3: Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network;

Goal 2.6: Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.

SUMMARY

The service as provided through the HACC Transport Program, has the following identified strengths:

Flexibility of service

Cost reduced on long trips

Broader range of trip types offered

Represents a co-ordinated metropolitan wide approach

HACC Transport Project can respond in shorter timeframe than the City of Wanneroo service

A hoist vehicle is available with the HTP

Many City of Wanneroo clients already choose the HTP

Some concerns identified include:

Significant cost increase for short trips

Question of what alternative work will be available for existing volunteers

Where appropriate, volunteers will be offered alternative duties with the City within the HACC program, or will be given information and referral to access other volunteering opportunities, should this proposal proceed.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

NOTES FROM MEETING WITH VOLUNTEER DRIVERS (WANNEROO VOLUNTARY SERVICES) HELD 20 MAY 2002

Total Number of Participants: 10

Advantages of the Existing Voluntary Transport Service

· Not purely based on economics;

· Value added service;

· Supported by principles of volunteering;

· Caring environment;

· Reliable service;

· On time;

· Relationships are built up with clients – familiarity/personal attention;

· More time can be spent with clients, can stay with clients through appointments;

· Interpersonal relationships;

· Benefit for both client and volunteers; and

· Higher level of customer service.

Disadvantages of the Existing Voluntary Transport Service

· Do not provide for emergencies;

· No First Aid training;

· No after hours contact at the City in emergencies;

· Two days notice required to book transport;

· No communication in vehicles or sign in point;

· Volunteer skill utilisation;

· Depot curfew effects hours of operation e.g. last appointment is 3pm;

· No weekend service (although most if not all medical appointments not on weekends);

· No accessible vehicle for people in a wheelchair;

· Limited service;

· Long waiting periods and long journeys where servicing multiple clients;

· Administration procedures for multiple clients can lead to confusion/missed appointments; and

· Housing of vehicle not always convenient especially for outlying suburbs.

Proposed HACC Service – Advantages

· Increased hours of after hours service;

· Cheaper for government, more economies, big picture approach;

· Cheaper for long distance clients;

· Availability of wheelchair lifts and other aids;

· Purpose built vehicles;

· Social outings; and

· Flexibility.

ATTACHMENT 2, P 2

Proposed HACC Service – Disadvantages

· What available alternatives for volunteers;

· Politically damaging for City;

· Will it be privatised?;

· Passing on of information regarding client’s special needs;

· 90% clients will be disadvantaged financially;

· Taxis may take other fares due to lack of commitment and therefore not meet appointments;

· May not take on long runs due to lack of return fares;

· Service guarantees for outlying suburbs;

· Lack of rapport and familiarity;

· If service fails what happens?; and

· Waiting time for clients – if appointments are early or late.

Issues to Consider Should Voluntary Services Remain With the City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport

· First aid training for drivers;

· Multi card for fuel – allow driver to go to cheapest outlet;

· Volunteers on call for emergencies;

· Complaint handling procedures;

· Access to Depot car parking;

· Modified vehicles – special needs/affordability/no steps;

· Mobile phones in buses – no steps;

· Licensing issues – F class;

· Recorded message service – next day’s appointments; and

· After hours service if possible.

Issues to Consider for HACC Model

· Issues for people from CLDB;

· Disadvantage created by distance particularly for outlying suburbs;

· Volunteer redundancy – new opportunities;

· Consultation strategy in terms of keeping volunteers and clients informed;

· Volunteer program offered by HACC suggesting volunteers may accompany clients in taxis is not acceptable;

· Licensing issues – F class;

· Limited amount of work for buses;

· Issues associated with Centrelink – loss of mobility allowance;

· Complaint avenues for clients; and

· Transition program for clients.

ATTACHMENT 2, P 3

Memorandum received from Volunteer Driver:

Re: PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE HACC FUNDED TRANSPORT SERVICE

When considering today’s topic it is in my view paramount to remain focused on the fact that we are considering changes to what is regarded as a well respected community service and that there are considerations other than economics which should come into play. Having said this I offer for consideration the following comments/suggestions:

A. In the majority of cases the service is, although not exclusively, provided to the more

mature aged citizens domiciled within the boundaries of the City.

B. Mindful of the fact that one or two working days notice is required if the service is to be availed of them it is fair to say that, with very few exceptions, the service does not

provide for emergencies.

C. From my experience as a volunteer driver I would assess that appointment times are

usually known well in advance.

D. The providers of the medical services sought by the users of the Transport Service would not normally consult on weekends or public holidays.

E. Having regard for B, C and D above a differential of one working day in the time

necessary to book transport is of little or no consequence.

F. The case study of Mrs Zed infers that the client, having contacted HTP at the conclusion of an appointment, would not be required to wait as long as he/she may have to under the current arrangements, this is a ‘red herring’. The availability of accredited taxis within the area would be the determining factor. I’m sure many of us have experienced the frustration of waiting for taxis booked through the taxi base.

G. The correspondence makes the point that the service would not be denied to an eligible

client simply because they could not afford the fee. In Case Study 2 a cost of $21.00

is used as an example. Over the last three and a half years I have transported clients

from both Yanchep and Two Rocks and have never been asked to collect a fee

even close to this figure.

H. The circumstances outlined in Case Study 3 are acknowledged and are certainly of

importance BUT requests of this nature would, I suggest, be in the minority

when compared to the demand for transport for medical related appointments.

I. HTA obviously provides transport BUT volunteer drivers provide “value added services”

and I dare say an increased level of care and compassion for those whom we transport.

J. The ultimate provider of HTP transport is a profit driven taxi company and for the

individual drivers “time is money”. Given the choice of a HACC short

journey/low fare or a general public request for a long trip/large fare

(eg airport) logic says that for economic reasons the taxi driver would opt

for the more remunerative job.

ATTACHMENT 2, P 4

K Other than an increased degree of flexibility (early/late weekend pickups) no evidence

had been tabled which would support the view that HPT can provide a more

timely or equal quality service (in the real sense of the word) than that which is

already available via the City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport.

L. Furthermore, on an across the board basis, any cost savings under the HTP model to

the individual users are questionable given the “means testing” and a policy

which ensures no individual would be deemed transport simply because they

could not afford to pay the ‘normal’ fee.

On balance I am of the view that the current voluntary transport arrangements offer ‘better service’ to the citizens domiciled within its area of influence and would therefore favour its retention. Improvements are of course always possible and in the event that the City of Wanneroo votes to retain the current service, I suggest consideration also be given to:

1. the acquisition of a vehicle designed to transport wheelchair bound clients, and

2. extending the curfew for the return of the vehicles to the Depot so as to

accommodate those clients who, through now fault of their own, cannot

make appointments/control the punctuality of the medical service provider

which would enable them to have a return pickup by 3.00pm.

R K (Rod) Hannan

Volunteer Driver

City of Wanneroo Voluntary Transport Service

20^th May 2002

ATTACHMENT 3

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Agenda / Note Record

MEETING	Voluntary Transport
PARTICIPANTS	Cr. Judy Hughes, Cr. Dot Newton, Cr. Glynis Monks, Cr. Rudi Steffens, Ms. Fiona Bentley (Director Community Development), Mr Mark Teale (Team Leader – Aged and Disability Services), Mr Luat Duong (Community Services Officer), Mr Peter Scott (Volunteer) and Mr John Watt (Resident).
CHAIR	Mayor Jon Kelly
DATE & TIME	Wednesday 29 May 2002 @ 7pm

The meeting was convened at approximately 7.10pm. Due to the number of attendees the meeting took place in an informal manner.

A general overview of the proposal was given. Clarification was given on the different transport services provided by the City

A question was asked with regard to current service provision utilising volunteers. It was asked whether volunteers should be conducting personal business when undertaking voluntary transport duties. It was confirmed that this should not be occurring and that the issue would be followed up by Administration.

A question was asked with regard to what would happen to volunteers should responsibility for the provision of voluntary transport services be transferred to the HACC Transport Program. It was indicated that the City would work with volunteers to access alternate volunteering duties, either with the City or other service providers. It was also indicated that there was some scope for volunteers to work with the HACC Transport Program, accompanying people to appointments.

A request was made for a copy of the information that was given to clients of the existing program. This was provided.

There being no other issues raised the meeting was closed at approximately 7.45pm.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CD03-07/02 Contract For The Provision Of Adult And Youth Leisure Courses

File Ref: C02251

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

File Name: BAConfor.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendation of Tender Number 02251 for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses for a period of three years.

Background

The City of Wanneroo has been providing adult and youth leisure courses from the Gumblossom, Wanneroo and Hainsworth Recreation Centres since 1976.

Up until the year 2000, leisure courses were operated in-house by the City of Wanneroo, however, due to the ongoing high costs involved in running the courses, a decision was made to investigate alternative options for provision of the adult and youth leisure courses

Tenders were originally advertised on the 13 November 1999 closing on the 30 November 1999 with one tender submission received from West Coast College Commercial. The Joint Commissioners at their meeting on the 7 December 1999 granted approval to accept the Tender received from West Coast College Commercial for a period of one year.

A Contract was formed between the City of Wanneroo and West Coast College Commercial commencing on the 13 December 1999 and expiring on the 30 November 2000. Following authorization for an extension to the Contract Period (as per the General Conditions of Contract) by Council at its meeting on the 12 December 2000, the Contract was subsequently extended for a period of one year expiring on the 30 November 2001.

At the Ordinary Council meeting held on Tuesday 21 May 2002 Council passed the following resolution:

That Council INVITES tenders for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses utilising

the City’s recreation centres as per the following specification and scope of works…”

Detail

Tenders were advertised on the 1 June 2002 closing on the 18 June 2002. Eleven Tender Documents were downloaded from the City of Wanneroo tender download site and one tender was picked up from the City of Wanneroo customer service counter. Only one tender submission was received at tender closing from West Coast College Lifelong Learning.

The tender submission was evaluated in accordance with the following weighted selection criteria as detailed in Tender Number 02251:

a) Tenderer’s detailed written response to the tender document explaining its proposed methodology for provision of the Service in accordance with the requirements of the specification;

b) Tenderer’s resources.

c) Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out work similar to the Services; and

d) Safety management.

West Coast College Lifelong Learning (formerly West Coast College Commercial) has been providing quality adult and youth leisure courses at reasonable rates and a satisfactory level to the community since it was appointed as the City’s contractor in 1999. It is the adult education and professional development short course centre within the West Coast College of TAFE that focuses on delivering adult education courses throughout the northern corridor comprising a team with 15 years experience in developing new and innovative adult education, leisure and recreational courses.

West Coast College Lifelong Learning has provided a detailed written response to the tender document, explaining its proposed methodology for provision of the adult and youth leisure courses in accordance with the requirements of the specification set by Council at its meeting on the 21 May 2002. It has committed to maintaining the times, duration, range, pricing and content of leisure courses as per the existing structure while introducing new/in-demand programs. It has also committed to arrange and fund all advertising and marketing of the adult and youth leisure course programs including local media and will contribute $2.00 per participant into an asset management fund for the replacement of carpets, curtains, equipment and other equipment as deemed necessary.

West Coast College Lifelong Learning has ample resources to provide the required services, comes equipped with a high level of experience in delivering adult and youth education and leisure services to numerous locations over a number of years, has the ability to offer a TAFE certificate of attendance to each student and maintains a satisfactory level of safety management.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

The City of Wanneroo has an excellent relationship with the West Coast College Lifelong Learning as a result of its provision of adult and youth leisure courses over the past three years and is confident that it will continue to provide quality leisure courses to the community at reasonable rates.

Based on the high level of past performance, the commitment and response to the specification and the assessment of the tender submission, it is recommended that the tender received from West Coast College Lifelong Learning be accepted for the provision of adult and youth leisure services for a period of three years.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

The provision of Adult and Youth Leisure courses is in accordance with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, Healthy Communities, 2.7 Provide community focused services and lifestyle opportunities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The Tender is based on the City of Wanneroo providing free use of recreation facilities to conduct the leisure courses, however as per the requirements of the Tender, West Coast College Lifelong Learning has agreed to contribute $2.00 per course participant for the replacement of carpets, curtains, equipment and other replacement items as per the Tender specifications.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

Recommendation

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

That Council ACCEPTS Tender Number 02251 from West Coast Lifelong Learning for the provision of adult and youth leisure courses for a period of three years, in accordance with the conditions of tendering.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CD04-07/02 Use Of City Of Wanneroo Fire Service Logo

File Ref: 03601

File Name: CAUseofC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 27 June 2002

Level 4 Approval by agm Date 19 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by agm Date 14 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by agm Date 14 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To obtain Council’s approval for the continued use of the City of Wanneroo Fire Service logo.

Background

In November 1999, Council employed a Fire Management Officer to manage and oversee the volunteer fire service brigades within the City. As this was a new position within Council, the marketing section designed a fire service logo/badge, utilising the existing City of Wanneroo logo that the Fire Management Officer could wear as part of his Council-issue dress uniform.

Detail

This logo has been in use since November 1999 and is currently still in use on all of the Council’s fire fighting vehicles and on the volunteer fire brigade letterhead. There are two items of difference with the fire service logo, as compared to the Council logo, being:

· It has the words “Fire Service” on the bottom of the circle

· The colour of the background behind the Kangaroo Paw motif is yellow instead of white.

Comment

The volunteer fire fighters currently have a City of Wanneroo Fire Service brigade name badge on their fire fighting personal protective clothing. The issue of this type of badge has ceased and only a brigade name badge is being distributed.

The Council has approved the signing of a memorandum of understanding with the Fire and Emergencies Services Authority (FESA). The term Fire Services is consistent with the titles of similar services provided by this authority and would provide recognition of the service provided by the City in a professional manner and be consistent with FESA practices.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Council has approved the progression of the City’s Fire Service by enabling the City to enter into a Management Agreement with FESA to enhance the City’s ability, and use FESA resources to provide fire response and prevention activities with a focus on community education, identification and planning to manage fire risks within the City of Wanneroo. Continued use of the Fire Services logo would demonstrate the City’s commitment to proactive fire fighting and the City’s strategic alignment with FESA.

Policy Implications

STATEMENT (Extract from Council Minutes of 27 February 2001)

No person, without the written authority of the Chief Executive Officer, shall assume or use the City of Wanneroo Council Logo (as shown below), or any design so nearly resembling the City of Wanneroo Council Logo as to be likely to be confused.

No member of the Council or staff is authorized to use the City of Wanneroo Council Logo for any purpose other than authorized Council business.

This report seeks council endorsement of the continued use of the Fire Services logo regarding the policy statement detailed above.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ENDORSES the continued use of the City of Wanneroo Fire Service logo, as pictured:

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CD05-07/02 Donations, Sponsorships And The Waiver Of Fees And Charges - Proposed Policy

File Ref: 08032

File Name: EADonand.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 27 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 27 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 27 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 2

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Consideration of a policy that provides a framework for the assessment of requests made for donations and the waiver of fees and charges.

Background

Council, at its meeting on 10 April 2001, resolved to;

“Determine all future proposals for the waiver of fees and charges for community organisations using City facilities for humanitarian purposes”

Since this time, Council has considered all requests for donations and the waiver of fees and charges on an individual merit basis.

In order to provide Council with the necessary information to determine each application, and an understanding of budgetary implications, a report is normally prepared for each Council meeting.

Detail

During the 2002/2003 financial year, Council distributed $26,000 in donations and waivers of fees and charges associated with City facilities.

As the year progressed, the number of requests received on a monthly basis increased dramatically, with Council considering up to 10 individual items at any one meeting.

The current process has highlighted a need for the development of consistent criteria for donations and waivers, which will increase the efficiency and equity of assessment and determination procedures.

With this in mind, a proposed policy with the objective of donations and sponsorships supporting the City’s strategic objectives, as well as providing a framework for donation and waiver assessment has been prepared and is attached (Attachment 1)

The proposed policy is to be supplemented by a detailed corporate management procedure, which is attached for further information (Attachment 2).

Under this framework, applications for support received by the City will be divided into two areas:

· General donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges

· Sponsorship of young people resident in the City of Wanneroo in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

The sponsorship category has been divided from general donations given the number of applications received for this type of support from residents.

a) Category One: General Donations

Under the general donations category, all applications considered by the City would be required to be in writing and provide information regarding the assessment criteria shown below.

· The potential for income generation or profit from the event

· The status of the applicant organization

· The nature of the event or activity

· The exclusivity of the event

· The alignment or congruence of the event or activity with Council’s philosophies and strategic direction

· The perceived benefit of the event or activity to the Wanneroo community

· The ability of the event or activity to complement existing community services

· Alternative funding sources available and accessed by the organization

· Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organization

· Previous funding assistance provided by the organization to the City of Wanneroo

· Adherence to City requirements

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Under this criterion, the City would not accept or consider applications for donations or waivers for:

· Any profit making ventures for commercial entities

· Any activity, event or program that contravenes Council’s existing policies

· The bond associated with the use of City facilities (only the waiver of fees for an activity, event or function will be considered)

Determination procedures for these types of requests would include considerations and decisions by both the Chief Executive Officer (under delegated authority) and Council and are proposed as follows:

Donation value/ applicant

Determination Procedure

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations or individuals

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations and individuals

Council determination

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Council determination

Applications with extenuating circumstances

Council determination

All requests approved by the Chief Executive Officer under delegated authority would be the subject of a report to each briefing session of Council.

b) Category Two: Sponsorship of young people resident in the City of Wanneroo in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

Under the sponsorship category, residents of the City aged 18 years or under would be eligible to apply to Council for assistance towards their participation in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions.

As for Category 1 donations, all applications considered by the City would be required to be in writing, and provide information regarding the assessment criteria shown below.

· City of Wanneroo residency and proof of age (18 years or under)

· Support from school or sporting club, State association

· Commitment to the provision of a written report after the event or activity

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Under this criterion, the City would not accept or consider applications for sponsorship of athletes or performers if:

· The athlete or performer receives payment of any kind for their participation in the event or activity

· An application for sponsorship is made on a retrospective basis (ie. after the event or activity has taken place)

Determination procedures for these types of requests would include consideration and decisions by both the Chief Executive Officer (under delegated authority) and Council and are proposed according to the following schedule:

Type of competition/exhibition/festival

Amount of sponsorship provided

Application determined by

Regional or State

$50 per individual

Chief Executive Officer (under delegated authority)

National or International

$100 per individual

Chief Executive Officer (under delegated authority)

In addition to these basic determination procedures, the following conditions are also proposed to apply:

· Applications to support team travel to an event/festival or exhibition shall not exceed $300, to be divided equally amongst City of Wanneroo resident members of the team or group.

· Teams or groups will be required to provide, with their application, a list of the Wanneroo resident team or group member names and addresses.

· Individuals and teams or groups shall be eligible for one allocation only per financial year

· Any applications with extenuating circumstances are to be forwarded to Council for consideration and determination

All requests approved by the Chief Executive Officer under delegated authority would be the subject of a report to each briefing session of Council.

Consultation

Given that an extensive community consultation program was recently undertaken to determine the key elements of the City’s Strategic Plan, and this policy directly supports the achievement of these objectives, it is not recommended that community consultation is necessary in this circumstance.

In addition, the policy does not constitute a major change to the way in which donations, sponsorships and waivers are considered, but formalises and streamlines existing assessment procedures in the interests of equity and accountability.

Comment

It is recommended that the proposed Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy be adopted, due to its ability to provide a framework that:

· Is transparent and accountable to the community

· Contains an effective reporting mechanism for applications, and;

· Results in an equitable assessment of each application received by the City of Wanneroo

Adoption of the policy will also result in the development of a more streamlined process for applicants, through a checklist of assessment criterion, which will assist potential applicants to apply and provide assurance that all applications are determined on an equitable basis.

Statutory Compliance

Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act allows Council to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the exercising of certain powers and duties under the Act. The decision to delegate requires endorsement by an absolute majority of Council.

Strategic Implications

A policy of this nature reinforces Council’s strategic commitment to Healthy Communities, by providing a public and recognised method for the City to support organisations and individuals committed to achieving objectives similar to those stated in the City’s Strategic Plan.

Policy Implications

Proposed new policy

Financial Implications

If adopted, this policy would operate under the Donations budget determined by elected representatives each financial year.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ADOPT the Donations, Sponsorships, and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy as follows:

Policy Owner: Community Development Directorate

Distribution: All staff

Implementation: 1 July 2002

Scheduled Review: 1 May 2004

Introduction

The City of Wanneroo is committed to creating a vibrant and diverse City, based on the development of healthy communities and a sustainable environment.

This strategic intent requires the City to lead and participate in community activities and development, as well as form partnerships with organizations and agencies involved in particular programs and endeavours.

Donations and sponsorships are one of the methods that can be utilised by the City to recognise and encourage individuals and organizations also committed to achieving these objectives at a local, state, national, and sometimes international level.

The provision of financial or in-kind support to individuals and organisations assists in the development and operation of programs and activities, and links the City to these type of endeavours, further establishing and promoting overall strategic directions.

Support can also assist to establish the City’s identity and corporate citizenship at a wider level, linking it with causes and concerns at a State and National level that contribute to the development of local healthy communities and a sustainable environment.

Objective

In order to pursue the City’s wider objectives in an accountable and equitable manner, this policy provides a framework for the assessment of requests for donations, sponsorships, and the waiver of fees and charges for the use of City facilities outside of the City’s existing policies for facility and reserve hire and use, and Community Funding Program.

Statement

Given that the City receives a large number of requests from community groups and organisations throughout the year for donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges associated with the use of City facilities, a procedure for the assessment of applications ensures:

· Transparency and accountability to the community

· An effective reporting mechanism to Council regarding the total value of donations approved in any one financial year

· An equitable assessment of each application or request received

· A standard process for applicants to follow when requesting donations or sponsorships from the City

Donation, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Categories

Requests for donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges will be received and determined in two (2) category areas:

1. General donations, sponsorship, and the waiver of fees and charges

This category includes requests for donations and the waiver of fees and charges from local, regional, state, national and international organisations and individuals, with the exception of those requests defined in category two (2), described below.

2. Sponsorship of young people resident in the City of Wanneroo in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

This category provides for sponsorship requests from young people within the City of Wanneroo (up to 18 years of age), who are performing or competing at State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions.

The City WILL NOT consider applications for donations or the waiver of fees and charges (Category 1) for:

· Any profit making ventures for commercial entities

· Any activity, event or program that contravenes Council’s existing policies

· The bond associated with the use of City facilities (only the waiver of fees for an activity, event or function will be considered)

The City WILL NOT consider applications for sponsorship of athletes or performers (Category 2) if:

· The athlete or performer receives payment of any kind for their participation in the event or activity

· An application for sponsorship is made on a retrospective basis (ie. after the event or activity has taken place)

Assessment Procedures

Operational details associated with donation and sponsorship assessment will be detailed in a management procedure including the following;

· The receipt of all requests in writing

· The provision of assessment criteria to applicants to assist with their request

· The written assessment of requests against a number of criteria based on the overall objectives of the policy

Assessment criterion for Category 1 (General Donations) will include:

· The potential for income generation or profit from the event

· The status of the applicant organization

· The nature of the event or activity

· The exclusivity of the event

· The alignment or congruence of the event or activity with Council’s philosophies and strategic direction

· The perceived benefit of the event or activity to the Wanneroo community

· The ability of the event or activity to complement existing community services

· Alternative funding sources available and accessed by the organization

· Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organization

· Previous funding assistance provided by the organization to the City of Wanneroo

· Adherence to City requirements

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Assessment criterion for Category 2 Sponsorships will include:

· City of Wanneroo residency and proof of age (18 years or under)

· Support from school or sporting club, State association

· Commitment to the provision of a written report after the event or activity

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Determination Procedures

1. Category One (1) – General donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges

Donation value/ applicant

Determination Procedure

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations or individuals

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations and individuals

Council determination

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Council determination

Applications with extenuating circumstances

Council determination

2. Category Two (2) – Sponsorship of City of Wanneroo residents in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

2.1 General determinations

Applications for sponsorship of athletes and performers will be determined under delegated authority by the Chief Executive Officer according to the following schedule:

Type of competition/exhibition/festival

Amount of sponsorship provided

Regional or State

$50 per individual

National or International

$100 per individual

Applications to support team travel to an event/festival or exhibition shall not exceed $300, to be divided equally amongst City of Wanneroo resident members of the team or group.

Teams or groups will be required to provide, with their application, a list of the Wanneroo resident team or group member names and addresses.

Individuals and teams or groups shall be eligible for one allocation only per financial year.

2.2 Applications with extenuating circumstances

If an application for a donation for sponsorship does not meet the evaluation criteria but is assessed by City Administration as a case warranting further consideration, it will be forwarded to Council for determination.

Reporting procedures

A record of each application determined by the Chief Executive Officer and its assessment against evaluation criteria shall be maintained as part of the City’s Delegated Authority Register.

A report noting donations and waivers of fees and charges approved under delegated authority will be prepared for each applicable Council briefing session.

Applications determined by Council under this policy shall become part of the public record, via Council minutes.

Definitions

Donations: Donations are defined as requests from organisations or groups for a contribution towards an activity, event, or program with a charitable or community service orientated purpose

Fees and Charges: Fees and charges are defined as those imposed by the City on an organisation or group for the use of a City owned facility, the staging of a particular event or activity, or associated with the construction of a building or completion of a project

City facilities: City facilities are defined as all City owned and operated facilities and reserves across the City that are included as available for hire or use in the City’s Annual Schedule of Fees and Charges

Sponsorship: Sponsorship is defined as support to City of Wanneroo residents 18 years of age or under who compete or perform in Regional, State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

Responsibility for Implementation

Community Development Directorate

2. DELEGATE TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the authority to waive fees and charges and approve donations in accordance with the provisions of Council’s Donations, Sponsorship, and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1, P 1

DONATIONS, SPONSORSHIPS, AND THE WAIVER OF FEES AND CHARGES

Policy Owner: Community Development Directorate

Distribution: All staff

Implementation: 1 July 2002

Scheduled Review: 1 May 2004

Introduction

The City of Wanneroo is committed to creating a vibrant and diverse City, based on the development of healthy communities and a sustainable environment.

Objective

ATTACHMENT 1, P 2

Statement

· Transparency and accountability to the community

· An effective reporting mechanism to Council regarding the total value of donations approved in any one financial year

· An equitable assessment of each application or request received

· A standard process for applicants to follow when requesting donations or sponsorships from the City

Donation, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Categories

Requests for donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges will be received and determined in two (2) category areas:

1. General donations, sponsorship, and the waiver of fees and charges

2. Sponsorship of young people resident in the City of Wanneroo in State, National or

International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

The City WILL NOT consider applications for donations or the waiver of fees and charges (Category 1) for:

· Any profit making ventures for commercial entities

· Any activity, event or program that contravenes Council’s existing policies

· The bond associated with the use of City facilities (only the waiver of fees for an activity, event or function will be considered)

The City WILL NOT consider applications for sponsorship of athletes or performers (Category 2) if:

· The athlete or performer receives payment of any kind for their participation in the event or activity

· An application for sponsorship is made on a retrospective basis (ie. after the event or activity has taken place)

ATTACHMENT 1, P 3

Assessment Procedures

Operational details associated with donation and sponsorship assessment will be detailed in a management procedure including the following;

· The receipt of all requests in writing

· The provision of assessment criteria to applicants to assist with their request

· The written assessment of requests against a number of criteria based on the overall objectives of the policy

Assessment criterion for Category 1 (General Donations) will include:

· The potential for income generation or profit from the event

· The status of the applicant organization

· The nature of the event or activity

· The exclusivity of the event

· The alignment or congruence of the event or activity with Council’s philosophies and strategic direction

· The perceived benefit of the event or activity to the Wanneroo community

· The ability of the event or activity to complement existing community services

· Alternative funding sources available and accessed by the organization

· Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organization

· Previous funding assistance provided by the organization to the City of Wanneroo

· Adherence to City requirements

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Assessment criterion for Category 2 Sponsorships will include:

· City of Wanneroo residency and proof of age (18 years or under)

· Support from school or sporting club, State association

· Commitment to the provision of a written report after the event or activity

· Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

ATTACHMENT 1, P 4

Determination Procedures

1. Category One (1) – General donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and

charges

Donation value/ applicant

Determination Procedure

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations or individuals

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations and individuals

Council determination

Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Determined by CEO under delegated authority

Applications over $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations

Council determination

Applications with extenuating circumstances

Council determination

2. Category Two (2) – Sponsorship of City of Wanneroo residents in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

2.1 General determinations

Applications for sponsorship of athletes and performers will be determined under delegated authority by the Chief Executive Officer according to the following schedule:

Type of competition/exhibition/festival

Amount of sponsorship provided

Regional or State

$50 per individual

National or International

$100 per individual

ATTACHMENT 1, P 5

Applications to support team travel to an event/festival or exhibition shall not exceed $300, to be divided equally amongst City of Wanneroo resident members of the team or group.

Teams or groups will be required to provide, with their application, a list of the Wanneroo resident team or group member names and addresses.

Individuals and teams or groups shall be eligible for one allocation only per financial year.

2.2 Applications with extenuating circumstances

Reporting procedures

A record of each application determined by the Chief Executive Officer and its assessment against evaluation criteria shall be maintained as part of the City’s Delegated Authority Register.

A report noting donations and waivers of fees and charges approved under delegated authority will be prepared for each applicable Council Briefing Session.

Applications determined by Council under this policy shall become part of the public record, via Council minutes.

Definitions

Donations: Donations are defined as requests from organisations or groups for a

contribution towards an activity, event, or program with a charitable or community service orientated purpose

Fees and Charges: Fees and charges are defined as those imposed by the City on an

organisation or group for the use of a City owned facility, the staging of a particular event or activity, or associated with the construction of a building or completion of a project

City facilities: City facilities are defined as all City owned and operated facilities and

reserves across the City that are included as available for hire or use in the City’s Annual Schedule of Fees and Charges

Sponsorship: Sponsorship is defined as support to City of Wanneroo residents 18 years

of age or under who compete or perform in Regional, State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

Responsibility for Implementation

Community Development Directorate

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

APPLICATION OF DONATIONS, SPONSORSHIPS AND THE

WAIVER OF FEES AND CHARGES POLICY

Directorate: Community Development Directorate

Business Unit: Social Planning Team

Effective Date: July 2002

Scheduled Review: May 2001

Distribution: All Staff

1. Objective

To provide detailed procedures for staff assessing requests for donations, sponsorships and the waiver of fees and charges under City policy.

2. Statement

This procedure details receipt and assessment processes associated with the City’s Donation, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.

Administrative Processes

Category 1. General donations, sponsorship, and the waiver of fees and charges

Assessment Procedures

All requests for donations and the waiver of fees and charges are to be forwarded to the City’s Social Planning Team or other centralised City area as nominated by the Chief Executive Officer.

The responsible team will then follow the procedures below.

a) Receipt of written application from community based organisation, group, incorporated body or entity

The City must receive all applications for donations and the waiver of fees and charges in writing.

Applicants are to be provided with a copy of the assessment criteria nominated in this procedure, to both streamline the application process and ensure that assessments are equitable and accountable.

b) Assessment and preparation of written report regarding application against evaluation criteria

ATTACHMENT 2, P 2

Evaluation criteria to be used in the assessment of each application for the waiver of fees and charges or donations is as follows:

Criteria

Explanation

The potential for income generation or profit as a result of the event or activity

Will the event or activity result in profits for a particular entity and, if so, how will they be used (charity, to fund operations)?

The status of the applicant organisation

Is the applicant organisation a charitable institution, community group, incorporated body or commercial entity?

The nature of the event or activity

Is the event or activity a one-off or fundraising venture or of an administrative or operational nature?

The exclusivity of the event

Is the event available to certain members of the community or a club or to all residents of the City of Wanneroo?

The alignment or congruence of the event or activity with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction

Does the event or activity assist with the achievement of Council’s goals or does it incorporate an element the City values?

The perceived benefit of the event, activity or program to the Wanneroo community

Will the event, activity or program benefit the whole of the Wanneroo community or just a certain section?

The ability of the event or activity to provide or complement a community service

Does the event, activity or program have the ability to assist existing community services or achieve their goals?

Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation

If applicable, will this support assist the event or program to become self sufficient in the future and provide a benefit to the Wanneroo community?

ATTACHMENT 2, P 3

Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organization

Is the applicant contributing to the event or activity, either financially or with volunteer hours? What proportion of total expenses is the City being asked to donate?

Previous funding assistance provided to the organization by the City

Has the City provided funding assistance to this organization in the past? If so, what was the outcome of this contribution? Have funds provided by the Community Funding Program been acquitted?

Adherence to City requirements

If applicable, has the organisation submitted or been provided with the appropriate approvals required for this event?

Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Each successful applicant will be required to acknowledge the City’s support of the event or activity

The City WILL NOT consider applications for donations or the waiver of fees and charges for:

· Any profit making ventures for commercial entities

· Any activity, event or program that contravenes Council’s existing policies

· The bond associated with the use of City facilities (only the waiver of fees for an activity, event or function will be considered)

c) Approval of report by appropriate Director and referral of report to Chief Executive

Officer for determination

Once approved by the appropriate Director, the assessment of the application will be referred to the Chief Executive Officer or Council for determination

Determination procedures

Donation value/ applicant	Determination Procedure
Applications up to and including the value of $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations or individuals	Determined by CEO under delegated authority
Applications over $500.00 from City of Wanneroo based organisations and individuals	Council determination
Applications up to and including the value o f $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations	Determination by CEO under delegated authority
Applications over $500.00 from Regional, State, National or International organisations	Council determination
Applications with extenuating circumstances	Council determination

ATTACHMENT 2, P 4

Notification Procedures

All applicants requesting the wavier of fees and charges or a donation from the City are to receive:

· Written notification acknowledging their application and the determination process

· Written notification of the outcome of their application and, if not approved, reasons for refusal

Written notification regarding the approval of a donation, or waiver is to nominate specific marketing and promotional conditions, including recognition of support on advertising or promotional material prepared by the organisation and invitations for official Council representation at openings or functions associated with the event or activity.

Reporting procedures

A record of each application determined by the Chief Executive Officer and its assessment against evaluation criteria shall be maintained as part of the City’s Delegated Authority Register.

A report noting donations and waivers of fees and charges approved under delegated authority will be prepared for each applicable Council briefing session.

Applications determined by Council under this policy shall become part of the public record, via Council minutes.

Category Two (2) – Sponsorship of young people resident in the City of Wanneroo in State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

Assessment Procedures

All requests for sponsorship are to be forwarded to the City’s Social Planning Team or other centralised City area as nominated by the Chief Executive Officer.

The responsible team will then follow the procedures below.

a) Receipt of written application from individual, sporting or community group or School

The City must receive all applications for sponsorship in writing.

Applicants will be provided with a copy of the assessment criteria nominated in this procedure to both streamline the application process and ensure that assessments are equitable and accountable.

b) Assessment and preparation of written report regarding application against evaluation criteria

ATTACHMENT 2, P 5

Evaluation criteria that will be used to assess each request for sponsorship will be as follows:

Criteria

Explanation

City of Wanneroo residency and proof of age

Does the applicant reside within the City of Wanneroo?

Is the applicant 18 years of age or under?

Support from school or sporting club, State association

An official letter must accompany each application for sponsorship from the organising body associated with the event (ie. State association or relevant organization)

Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event or activity

Each successful applicant will be required to provide Council with a written report (and photographs where possible) regarding the event or activity

Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo

Each successful applicant will be required to acknowledge support of the City through either displaying or distributing promotional items provided by the City

The City WILL NOT consider applications for sponsorship of athletes or performers if:

· The athlete or performer receives payment of any kind for their participation in the event or activity

· An application for sponsorship is made on a retrospective basis (ie. after the event or activity has taken place)

c) Approval of report by appropriate Director and referral of report to Chief Executive

Officer for determination

Once approved by the appropriate Director, the assessment of the application will be referred to the Chief Executive Officer or Council for determination.

Determination procedures

a) General determinations

Applications for sponsorship of athletes and performers will be determined under delegated authority by the Chief Executive Officer according to the following schedule:

ATTACHMENT 2, P 6

Type of competition/exhibition/festival

Amount of sponsorship provided

Regional or State

$50 per individual

National or International

$100 per individual

Applications to support team travel to an event/festival or exhibition shall not exceed $300, to be divided equally amongst City of Wanneroo resident members of the team or group.

Teams or groups will be required to provide, with their application, a list of the Wanneroo resident team or group member names and addresses.

Individuals and teams or groups shall be eligible for one allocation only per financial year.

b) Applications with extenuating circumstances

Notification Procedures

All applicants requesting sponsorship from the City will receive:

· Written notification acknowledging their application and the determination process

· Written notification of the outcome of their application and, if not approved, reasons for refusal

Written notification regarding the approval of the sponsorship is to nominate specific marketing and promotional conditions, including the display or distribution of promotional items provided by the City.

Reporting procedures

A record of each application determined by the Chief Executive Officer and its assessment against evaluation criteria shall be maintained as part of the City’s Delegated Authority Register.

A report noting sponsorships approved under delegated authority will be prepared for each applicable Council Briefing Session.

Applications determined by Council under this policy shall become part of the public record, via Council minutes.

ATTACHMENT 2, P 7

3. Definitions

Donations:

Donations are defined as requests from organisations or groups for a contribution towards an activity, event, or program with a charitable or community service orientated purpose

Fees and Charges:

Fees and charges are defined as those imposed by the City on an organisation or group for the use of a City owned facility, the staging of a particular event or activity, or associated with the construction of a building or completion of a project

City facilities:

City facilities are defined as all City owned and operated facilities and reserves across the City that are included as available for hire or use in the City’s Annual Schedule of Fees and Charges

Sponsorship:

Sponsorship is defined as support to City of Wanneroo residents 18 years of age or under who compete or perform in Regional, State, National or International competitions, festivals or exhibitions

4. Responsibility for Implementation

Referrals of requests - all staff

Request assessments - Community Development Directorate - Social Planning Team

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Chief Executive Office

General

CE01-07/02 Adoption Of Principal Activity Plan 2002 - 2006

File Ref: 6655

File Name: Cadf4456.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To approve the City of Wanneroo Principal Activity Plan after the closing of the community consultation period.

Background

Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on the 9^th April 2002 resolved as follows:

“That Council ENDORSE the City of Wanneroo Principal Activity Plan for the period commencing on the 1^st July 2002 to the 30^th June 2006 as detailed below”

The consultation period concluded on the 17^th June 2002.

Detail

Council has received no public submissions in relation to the proposed Principal Activity Plan.

The purpose of the Principal Activity Plan is to detail:

1. The principal activities that are proposed to be commenced or contained in each year.

2. The objectives of each

3. Estimated costs of, and the proposed means of funding

4. How the performance is to be assessed

5. Estimated income and expenditure

6. Other matters as prescribed

Consultation

The Principal Activity Plan has been advertised in the Wanneroo Times and the Western Australian as well as on all Council Public Notice Boards. Copies of the plan have been made available in all Council Libraries, Administration Centre and on Council’s web site at www.wanneroo.wa.gov.au. Public comment was open for a period of 42 days.

Comment

It is hoped that with the current review of the Local Government Act 1995, the requirement to produce a Principal Activity Plan will be replaced with the requirement to produce a Strategic Plan and forward financial budget. The lack of public interest in the Principal Activity Plan and time spent in producing such a plan would support this change.

Statutory Compliance

Section 5.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows Council to accept the Principal Activity Plan with or without modifications.

Strategic Implications

The Principal Activity Plan provides the forward financial plan for the strategic plan for the next four years.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

As detailed in the Principal Activity Plan.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ENDORSE the City of Wanneroo Principal Activity Plan for the period commencing on the 1^st July 2002 to the 30^th June 2006 as detailed below.

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES PLAN

FOR THE PERIOD

JULY 2002 – JUNE 2006

Message From the Mayor

Welcome to the new City of Wanneroo’s Draft Principal Activities Plan. This plan brings to life the Strategic Plan for the City of Wanneroo. I was pleased to see the extensive community involvement in the development of the Strategic Plan both at the initial stage of the plan when Council undertook an extensive market research campaign to the final stage when both Elected Members and staff went out into the community to discuss one-on-one with the community about the proposed plan.

The plan aims to provide our residents and ratepayers with an overview of the major activities and undertakings we, your elected council, anticipate providing the City.

We welcome your input and ideas, particularly in areas related to capital works and infrastructure development for our rapidly growing City.

Using as its base our Strategic Plan, the Principal Activities Plan is divided into 4 broad areas. Accompanying each section is a brief narrative, which describes our strategic objective, the anticipated expenditure and major projects, both capital and operational, and the measures we will use to determine whether our objectives have been achieved.

It is important to note that this is a draft and may be modified following a six-week public consultation period, in line with both your feedback and our financial constraints.

As part of the consultative process, your Councillors and the City’s Administration are available to discuss your issues and ideas.

I encourage you to consider it and provide us with your valued feedback.

Jon Kelly

Mayor, City of Wanneroo

INTRODUCTION

The City of Wanneroo is pleased to present this Principal Activity Plan to residents and landowners for review and comment. The Plan covers the four-year period from 2002/2003 to 2005/2006 The Plan is updated annually and is made available to residents and landowners for comment each year.

The City of Wanneroo is one of the fastest growing local government areas in Australia. Located 22 km north of Perth, the City covers an area of 687 km²and boasts a coastline of 32 km running from Two Rocks in the north to Mindarie in the south. The City of Wanneroo is a blend of rural and residential developments consisting of 310 km²rural and 40 km² residential and on average provides 25% of the residential lots in Perth, a trend that will result in a population growth from 83,000 residents to around 130,000 people over the next ten years,

Council recently undertook an extensive market research campaign to develop an understanding of our communities concerns and aspirations for the future of Wanneroo. Based on this research Council will focus on four key areas being:

· Environmental Sustainability

· Healthy Communities

· Economic Development

· Corporate Management

Our Principal Activity Plan incorporates projects, which support these core areas.

What is a Principal Activities Plan?

Under the Local Government Act 1995, each year the Local Government is required to prepare a plan of its principal activities for the next four or more years. The plan must be developed in conjunction with the community and, when finalised, will be taken into consideration with the adoption of the annual budget for the City.

The plan is an overview of the significant programs and activities proposed by the Council over the next four years. Its objectives are:

· To provide the community with information relation to the proposed principal activities; and

· To offer the community the opportunity to lodge submissions in relation to the proposals for consideration by the Council.

The Plan contains:

· A description of the principal activities proposed to be commenced or continued during the next four years;

· An explanation of why they are being carried out, the expected costs, how they are expected to be funded and how their performance will be measured; and

· An estimate of the total income and expenditure for each of the four years.

The Plan is revised and made available for public comment annually, prior to the finalisation and adoption of the annual budget. This enables the opportunity to:

· Update income and expenditure estimates;

· Change priorities to reflect changing circumstances;

· Add, modify or delete according to needs; and

· Respond appropriately to changes of community needs and perceptions, as expressed through submissions lodged each year and issues which may arise during the course of each year.

Reporting on the Plan:

Each year, within the City’s Annual Report, the performance measures identified against each principal activity will be reported on. This may take the form of statistics, dialogue or figures and may be quantitative or qualitative, depending on the measure.

What are Principal Activities?

The Local Government Act 1995 describes principal activities as:

· Major capital works projects;

· Major services;

· A program for the replacement of major assets;

· Major land transactions; and major trading undertakings.

It is up to each local government to examine its existing and proposed activities to determine which are appropriate for inclusion in the Principal Activities Plan. For the purposes of this Plan, the Council has decided to consider the five Directorates of Council for principal activities being the Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Community Development, Planning & Development, Technical Services and Corporate Services:

The five Directorships of the City of Wanneroo focus on the following four strategic goals.

a) Environmental Sustainability

To value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of our city.

· Conserve and enhance environmental assets

· Develop sustainable waste management options

· Support efficient use of water, energy and other resources

· Foster a culture of environmental awareness, ownership and action within the community and the organisation.

b) Healthy Communities

To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and provision of quality services and infrastructure .

· Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future

· Provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning

· Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network

· Support safe and secure communities

· Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity

· Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community

· Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities

c) Economic Development

To maximise opportunities for balanced economic growth and development within the City.

· Create an economic development strategy

· Identify, support and respond to the needs of existing and new industries

· Encourage employment growth within the community

· Support a viable rural industry

· Develop the tourism industry

· Develop a Wanneroo Brand

d) Corporate Management and Development

To create a culture that is committed to corporate learning, evolution and proper management of our natural, financial and human resources.

· Review and develop policies covering governance and management of our city

· Create harmony and unity through open communication, participation and ownership

· Establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service

Basis for Financial Estimates:

Within this document, all income and expenditure figures are estimates based upon the information available to the City at the time of preparation. They are expressed in current dollar terms. Consequently, some revision of estimates can be expected in response to inflation and other price variations beyond the control of the local government. The preliminary figures and the sources of funding will be further reviewed in the overall budget process. The Capital Works Projects will be reviewed following development of the budget.

Terminology:

“general purpose funding” means the sum total of current year rates levied, grants received from the Western Australian Local Government Grants Commission and any other funding which is not tied to a specific purpose.

“reserves” means monies set aside for future use on specific activities;

“tied funding” means any monies received for a specific purpose which must be expended on that purpose alone.

MAJOR NEW CAPITAL WORKS PLANNED FOR 2002/03

The Capital Works program will provide for the development of high quality facilities to support the quality of life of our community as well as maintain and improve current infrastructure to across the City to provide equality to all.

In line with the City’s Strategic Plan, major capital works for the coming year are grouped under our four strategic goals as follows:

Environmental Sustainability

Conservation of Reserves

Council proposes to invest $ $100,000 on rehabilitation including activities at Yellagonga Regional Park and Montrose Park.

Foreshore and Coastal Management

Over 1.3 million dollars is to be considered in the budget for the conservation and enchantment of our beautiful coastal environments.. Major works proposed include the seawall construction and sand renourishment program at Quinns Beach at an estimated cost of $1.23 million dollars with proposed grant funding of $700,000.

Stormwater Management

With the sensitive wetland and coastal environments within the City Of Wanneroo, the appropriate management of storm water is an important issue for the City. It is proposed to invest $300,000 in storm water management this year.

Healthy Communities

Parks and Sporting Facilities

Wanneroo is a community which values the wide variety of parks and sporting facilities within the City. Council proposes the following activities in this area:

· $280,000 towards park furniture including an upgrade of junior playground equipment in over seven parks

· $335,000 towards the enhancement of Council’s passive parks including $250,000 towards landscaping of dry parks.

· Council has excellent sporting facilities with the Kingsway Sporting Facility being the centre piece with over 1 million dollars being planned for car park and other improvements this year. In addition Council proposes to spend over $618,000 towards sport facilities improvements including $300,000 for Irrigation, turf and landscaping.

Transport

Road & Traffic

Management of Council’s road and traffic network together with the constructions and expansion of the network is a major component of the City’s expenditure each year. This year Council intends to invest in excess of $6.1million dollars. Significant projects include works at Hester Avenue (Marmion Ave to Hidden Retreat) and Hepburn Ave (The Avenue to Alexander Drive). Council estimates receiving $1.06 million of government funding.

The built environment forms a significant component of the visual environment of a community. To reduce the visual impact of major roads within the City Council proposes to spend over $210,000 in landscaping works in this area.

Footpath and Bicycle

Being a mobile community that is conscious of the need to conserve natural resources and being environmentally aware, Council has made a strong commitment to the provision of high quality bicycle and pedestrian access ways. Over $600,000 has been proposed for expenditure in this area. Significant projects include the construction of a dual use pathway in Yellagonga National Park, a dual use path along Wanneroo Road (west side from Woodvale Drive to Scenic Drive).

Security and Urban Renewal

Community safety is a major area of focus for the City. Community Safety can be improved by improvements in the following areas:

Security

Through an extensive community consultation program, the community have indicated that they support the continuation of the Safer Citizens project for the City of Wanneroo. Council is proposing to review the current Safer Citizens program and consider the impact of providing an additional $500,000 to further enhance this program. This represents a possible investment in the Safer Citizen program of 2 million dollars.

Street Lighting

It is proposed to spend $250,000 on street lighting which will improve traffic safety and encourage our community to interact with their neighbours.

Urban Environment

Over $515,000 is proposed to be spent in renewing communities including $480,000 towards the New North Redevelopment in association with the Ministry of Housing who have been requested to assist in jointly funding this project ($240,000).

Communities

Facilities that bring our community together are important aspects of the facilities provided by the City of Wanneroo. Council proposes to invest over 4.1 million dollars on Community Facilities including:

· The finalisation of projects such as the Clarkson Library (Project Cost 3 million dollars with funding from this financial year of 1.6 million), Hainsworth Community and Liesure Centre (funded over two years with $672,000 being funded this year) and the Alexander Heights Community Centre (funded over two years with $800,000 being funded this year).

· Completion of Stage One of the Quinns Rock/ Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club facility at an estimated cost of $1.1 million dollars of which Council’s contribution is estimated at $600,000

Council has a variety of strategies and activities to address the strategic goals relating to Economic Development and Corporate Management and Development. Council has a separate Economic Development Unit which forms part of the Planning and Development Directorate which has several economic development programs planned for the coming year.

All five Directorates will address the Corporate Management and Development strategic goals as part of their operating budgets.

MAJOR NEW CAPITAL WORKS PLANNED FOR THE FUTURE YEARS

Council has recently developed a new Strategic Plan for the City of Wanneroo which will provide for significant changes over the coming years.

As part of delivering to the Community the strategies proposed under the Strategic Plan, Council is currently preparing a variety of planning documents including:

· Strategic Asset Management Plan

· Human Services Plan

These documents will determine the capital works program for the next 5 years and will form the basis of Council’s 4 year forward budget.

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES PLAN
Capital Revenue and Expenditure
	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Revenue

Grants/Contributions from Developers	5,640,000	5,809,200	5,983,476	6,162,980
Security Levy	700,000	721,000	742,630	764,909

Total Revenue	6,340,000	6,530,200	6,726,106	6,927,889

Expenditure

Bicycle Facilites	270,000	278,100	286,443	295,036
Black Spot Projects	603,900	622,017	640,678	659,898
Coastal Management	1,017,900	1,048,437	1,079,890	1,112,287
Community Facilities	3,754,800	3,867,444	3,983,467	4,102,971
Conservation Reserves	90,000	92,700	95,481	98,345
Footpaths New	180,000	185,400	190,962	196,691
Footpaths Replacement	90,000	92,700	95,481	98,345
Foreshore Management	90,000	92,700	95,481	98,345
Golf Course Improvements	45,000	46,350	47,741	49,173
Landscaping Works	189,000	194,670	200,510	206,525
Parking Facilities	900,000	927,000	954,810	983,454
Parks Furniture	90,000	92,700	95,481	98,345
Passive Parks Development	301,500	310,545	319,861	329,457
Plant and Fleet Replacement	3,107,065	4,769,800	2,510,255	2,580,230
Road Construction	4,140,000	4,264,200	4,392,126	4,523,890
Road Preservation	1,395,000	1,436,850	1,479,956	1,524,354
Safer Citizens Program	2,000,000	2,060,000	2,121,800	2,185,454
Sports Facilities	1,440,000	1,483,200	1,527,696	1,573,527
Stormwater Drainage Upgrade	270,000	278,100	286,443	295,036
Street Lighting	225,000	231,750	238,703	245,864
Traffic Management	900,000	927,000	954,810	983,454
Urban Enhancement	463,500	477,405	491,727	506,479

Total Expenditure	21,562,665	23,779,068	22,089,801	22,747,162

Net Cost to Council	15,922,665	17,969,868	16,106,325	16,584,182

Reserve Funds - Vehicle and Plant Replacement	3,107,065	4,769,800	2,510,255	2,580,230
Municipal Fund	12,815,600	13,200,068	13,596,070	14,003,952
	15,922,665	17,969,868	16,106,325	16,584,182

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES PLAN
Operating Revenue and Expenditure

	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Operating Revenue

General Purpose Funding	25,547,544	26,313,970	27,103,389	27,916,491
Office of the CEO	0	0	0	0
Elected Member Costs	1,030	1,061	1,093	1,126
Corporate Services	3,003,480	3,093,584	3,186,392	3,281,984
Planning and Development	4,787,955	4,931,594	5,079,541	5,231,928
Technical Services	30,608,137	31,526,381	32,472,173	33,446,338
Community Development	6,741,350	6,943,591	7,151,898	7,366,455

Total Operating Revenue	70,689,496	72,810,181	74,994,486	77,244,321



Operating Expenditure

General Purpose Funding	0	0	0	0
Office of the CEO	1,681,568	1,732,015	1,783,975	1,837,494
Elected Member Costs	769,410	792,492	816,267	840,755
Corporate Services	8,281,928	8,530,386	8,786,298	9,049,887
Planning and Development	3,844,618	3,959,957	4,078,755	4,201,118
Technical Services	28,342,801	29,193,086	30,068,878	30,970,944
Community Development	14,580,535	15,017,951	15,468,489	15,932,544

Total Operating Expenditure	57,500,860	59,225,886	61,002,663	62,832,743

Operating Result	13,188,635	13,584,294	13,991,823	14,411,578

Amounts to fund Principal Activities	12,815,600	13,200,068	13,596,070	14,003,952

Surplus	373,035	384,226	395,753	407,626


Financial Summary


	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Funding Sources

General Purpose Funding

Rates Income	23,244,063	23,941,385	24,659,627	25,399,415
General Purpose Grants	1,296,789	1,335,693	1,375,763	1,417,036
Road Grants	1,006,692	1,036,892	1,067,999	1,100,039
Other General Purpose Income	0	0	0	0

Total General Purpose Income	25,547,544	26,313,970	27,103,389	27,916,491

Principal Activities

Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	700,000	721,000	742,630	764,909
Government Grants and Contributions	5,640,000	5,809,200	5,983,476	6,162,980
Fund Transfer from Reserve	3,107,065	4,769,800	2,510,255	3,679,329

Total Principal Activities	9,447,065	11,300,000	9,236,361	10,607,218

Non Principal Activities

Government Grants and Contributions	5,234,413	5,391,445	5,553,189	5,719,784
Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	24,572,249	25,309,416	26,068,699	26,850,760
Interest on Investments	1,327,410	1,367,232	1,408,249	1,450,497
Proceeds from Disposal of Assets	301,221	310,258	319,565	329,152
Other Income		0	0	0

Total Non Principal Activities	31,435,293	32,378,352	33,349,702	34,350,193

Total Funds Available	66,429,902	69,992,322	69,689,452	72,873,902

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Statement of Purpose

The Community Development Directorate is the public face of the City, who:

· Facilitates community growth and development

· Plans for future community infrastructure and facilities based on community needs and aspirations

· Provides spaces, places and services to enhance lifestyle options

· Protects, enhances and celebrates our heritage and culture

· Supports our community’s safety and security needs

· Ensures compliance with statutory requirements for the benefit of the wider community

Services and Products we provide

These are the services and products we provide to our customers within the organisation and the community

Community Services

Community Services provide a range of products and services that support:

· Planning for future communities and the renewal of existing suburbs

· The growth, development and promotion of young people

· Lifestyle choices for older people and people with a disability

· The financial self sufficiency of families in need

· Options for the professional care and development of children

· Community involvement in their local area

Leisure and Cultural Services

Leisure and Cultural Services provide a range of products and services that support:

· Planning for future communities and the renewal of existing suburbs

· The development of recreation, sporting and community organisations

· The development and use of community and recreational facilities

· Passive and active recreational options for the community

· The celebration of our culture through community events and arts

· Community safety along our coastline

Library and Heritage Services

Library and Heritage Services provide a range of products and services that support:

· Planning for future communities and the renewal of existing suburbs

· The lifelong learning needs of the community

· The information needs of the community

· The maintenance of a record of our history and culture

· The protection of our heritage for future generations

· Recreational reading and development

Ranger Services

Ranger Services provide a range of products and services that support:

· Planning for future communities and the renewal of existing suburbs

· Community education regarding relevant legislation

· Compliance with State and Local Government laws in relation to;

· Responsible dog and livestock ownership and control

· Litter

· Parking, abandoned vehicles and off road vehicular activity

· Signage

· The emergency service needs of the community through bushfire management and funding support to other services

· The safety and security of the community

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Expenditure

Operating Expenditure	1,681,568	1,732,015	1,783,975	1,837,494
Capital Expenditure	-	-	-	-

Total Expenditure	1,681,568	1,732,015	1,783,975	1,837,494

Less Non Cash Expenditure	98,696	101,656	104,706	107,847

Total Cash Expenditure	1,582,872	1,630,358	1,679,269	1,729,647

Funding Source

Government Grants, Subsidies	-	-	-	-
Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	-	-	-	-
Proceeds from Disposal Asset	-	-	-	-
City Funded	1,582,872	1,630,358	1,679,269	1,729,647

Total Funds Available	1,582,872	1,630,358	1,679,269	1,729,647

Capital Expenditure Summary

Acquisition and replacement of plant and fleet	-	-	-	-
Building improvements/construction and land acquisition	-	-	-	-

Total Capital Expenditure	0	0	0	0

ELECTED MEMBER COSTS

	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06
Expenditure

Operating Expenditure	769,410	792,492	816,267	840,755
Capital Expenditure	-	-	-	-

Total Expenditure	769,410	792,492	816,267	840,755

Less Non Cash Expenditure	110,494	113,809	117,223	120,740

Total Cash Expenditure	658,916	678,683	699,044	720,015

Funding Source

Government Grants, Subsidies
Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	1,030	1,061	1,093	1,126
Proceeds from Disposal Asset
City Funded	657,886	677,622	697,951	718,889

Total Funds Available	658,916	678,683	699,044	720,015

Capital Expenditure Summary

Acquisition and replacement of plant and fleet	-	-	-	-
Building improvements/construction and land acquisition	-	-	-	-

Total Capital Expenditure	0	0	0	0

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE02-07/02 Appointment Of Council Delegates To The AGMs Of Western Australian Local Government Association & Local Government Association

File Ref: 00033

File Name: CAppofCo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the appointment of Council delegates to the forthcoming AGMs of the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) and the Local Government Association (LGA).

Background

The AGMs for WALGA and LGA are scheduled for Sunday 4^th August 2002 as part of Local Government Week.

Council’s current delegates on the North Zone Committee of WALGA are:

Cr Stewart

Cr Newton

Cr Cvitan

Cr Grierson

Mayor Kelly (Deputy).

Detail

Council is required to formally nominate two (2) delegates for the WALGA AGM and four (4) delegates for the LGA AGM. These AGMs are required by each Association’s respective constitution that takes place every year.

Comment

Council may wish to consider nominating the four current delegates on the WALGA North Zone as delegates for the LGA AGM and further select two delegates from the WALGA North Zone to represent Council at the WALGA AGM.

Statutory Compliance

Section 5.10 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) allows Council to appoint members to Committees by an Absolute Majority.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. APPOINT by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following elected members to represent Council at the Annual General Meeting of the Western Australian Local Government Association to be held on Sunday 4^th August 2002.

Cr Stewart

Cr Newton

Cr Cvitan

Cr Grierson

Mayor Kelly (Deputy)

2. APPOINT by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following elected members to represent Council at the Annual General Meeting of the Western Australian Local Government Association to be held on Sunday 4^th August 2002.

Cr _______________ & Cr _____________ with Cr _______________- (Deputy)

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE03-07/02 City Of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001 - Amendments Required By The Delegated Legislation Joint Standing Committee

File Ref: S21/0004001

File Name: CCitofWa.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Daniel Simms Date 27 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the advice received from the Delegated Legislation Joint Standing Committee and amend the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001 to delete Part 4 of the local law relating to Graffiti protection of walls.

Background

Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting of the 9^th April 2002 resolved to adopt the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001. Prior to the adoption of this local law, Council followed the detailed procedure contained in the Local Government Act 1995, including giving State-wide and local notice of the proposed local laws, inviting submissions from the public on the local law, providing copies of the local law to any Minister under which the Minister administers the Act which the local law is made under and formally considering all comments made about the local law prior to adoption.

After this extensive consultation process Council, in accordance with the Local Government Act, has gazetted the local law and given state wide public notice to this effect. On the 28^th May 2002 Council received advice from the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation objecting to the new local law and requiring Part 4 of the local law to be repealed.

Detail

Part 4 of the Private Property Local Law states as follows:

4.1 Graffiti protection and removal

(1) A person shall not erect a fence, structure, building or wall constructured of masonry or other materials, adjacent to a public place or reserve without treating the fence, structure, building or wall with non-sacrificial graffiti protection.

(2) An owner or occupier of a lot with a fence, structure, building or wall erected adjacent to a public place or reserve shall treat that fence, structure, building or wall with non sacrificial graffiti protection where required by an authorised person.

(3) The graffiti protection treatment required in accordance with sub-clauses (1) and (2) shall be applied to the manufacturer’s specifications.

(4) The owner or occupier of a lot with a fence, structure, building or wall erected adjacent to a public place or reserve shall, when required by an authorised person, remove any graffiti which may have been applied to the fence, structure, building or wall.

4.2 Record of graffiti protection

Where in accordance with this local law, a person is required to treat a fence, structure, building or wall adjacent to a public place or reserve with graffiti protection, that person must cause to be affixed to that fence, structure, building or wall a plate inscribed with the approved number relating to the which identifies the name of the graffiti protection applied to the fence, structure, building or wall, and details of the manufacturer’s recommended treatment including materials to be used for removal of graffiti.

1.6 Definitions

“non sacrificial graffiti protection” means a coating applied to a fence or wall which is not removed in the process of removing graffiti.

The Standing Committee objection to Part 4 of the local law is detailed as Attachment 1 and can be summarised as follows:

The requirement to force a resident to meet the cost of graffiti is not reasonable as the owner should not have to pay for the criminal actions of someone else and exposes poorer constituents of the City to a financial burden.

The Committee use the test of unreasonableness in determining to require Council to repeal this section.

Comment

The comments raised in the public submissions can be grouped as follows:

Council has previously made a submission to the Minister for Local Government and Regional Development in regard to the current review of the Local Government Act 1995 requesting that the Act be amended to require that the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation comment on proposed local laws during the public consultation period.

The current practice is inefficient and in relation to amending a local law, exposes Council to further costs associated with recommencing the advertising process. The decision of the Joint Standing Committee in requiring the amendment to be carried out is not subject to public comment and review.

The test of unreasonableness in this instance does not seem to take into account the fact that the local law did not receive any objections from the community during the public consultation period and was further supported by the elected body of Council.

Whilst it is unfair that the home owners are indirectly paying for the criminal activities of offenders, the community expect Council to remove graffiti and this cost is currently already being met by home owners through their rates. The local law hopes to reduce the log-term impact on the cost to the community by looking at reducing the cost associated with graffiti removal by pre-treating surfaces.

It should also be noted that the previous Shire of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 1998 included similar clauses relating to graffiti protection which are detailed below:

“22 (1) A person must not erect a fence or wall constructed of masonry or other materials, adjacent to a public place or reserve without treating the fence or wall with non sacrificial graffiti protection,

(2) A person, owner, or occupier of a lot with a fence or wall erected adjacent to a public place or reserve shall treat that fence or wall with non sacrificial graffiti protection; where required by an authorised person;

(3) The graffiti protection treatment required in accordance with sub-clauses (1) and (2) shall be applied to the manufacturer’s specifications.

23 Where in accordance with this local law, a person is required to treat a fence or wall adjacent to a public place or reserve with graffiti protection, that person must cause to be affixed to that fence a plate inscribed with the approval number relating to the data base which identifies the name of the graffiti protection applied to the fence or wall, plus details of the manufacturer’s recommended treatment including materials to be used for removal of graffiti.

25 (3) Where in accordance with clause 22 graffiti protection has been applied to the section of a masonry fence or wall facing a reserve or public place and that wall is to be repaired or replaced, the owner or occupier of the lot adjacent to that section of fence or wall, must cause it to be treated with graffiti protection as part of the repair or replacement.”

These clauses have been in operation for a considerable time and have not been seen by the community as being unreasonable.

The Joint Standing Committee is however requiring Council to immediately repeal the following parts of the Private Property Local Law:

· Part 4

· That part of clause 1.6 which defines “non sacrificial graffiti protection”; and

· That part of the fifth Schedule referring to Part 4.

It is considered that Council should request the Joint Standing Committee reconsider this matter in view of the points raised previously in this report.

Should the Joint Standing Committee not be prepared to reconsider the matter then Council would be required to carry out the required amendments.

It should be noted that the Committee has failed to note that also Clause 5.2 (2) would require amendment as it refers to Clause 4.1 in Part 4.

Clause 5.2 (2) states “Where in accordance with clause 4.1 graffiti protection has been applied to the section of a masonry fence or wall facing a reserve or public place and that wall is to be repaired or replaced, the owner or occupier of the lot adjacent to that section of fence or wall, shall cause it to be treated with graffiti protection as part of the repair or replacement.”

It is suggested that if Council must delete Part 4 then Council may wish to request the Joint Standing Committee that Clause 5.1 (1) should be amended as follows:

5.1 Estate fencing

New Clause

(3) No person shall construct or erect an estate entry statement or estate boundary fence without treating the fence, structure, building or wall with non sacrificial graffiti protection.

It is considered not unreasonable to require a developer to treat an estate fence or entry statement with non sacrificial graffiti protection.

The Joint Standing Committee is also requiring an undertaking from Council to not rely on Part 4 in a prosecution in the interim.

It should be noted that in the original correspondence from the Joint Standing Committee, the Committee requested Council provide their response by the 28^th June 2002. Council then requested an extension of time until the 5^th July 2002 to allow Council to consider the matter at its Ordinary Council Meeting on the 2^nd July 2002.

The Committee have subsequently responded stating that they are unable to grant an extension of time and requested Council call a Special Council Meeting to consider the matter prior to 5pm on the 25^th June 2002.

The decision was made that it was not practicable to call a Special Council Meeting with such short notice and the Committee were advised accordingly.

The Committee subsequently met on the 26^th June 2002 and resolved to recommend to parliament the repealing of Part 4 of the local law only.

The Manager of Strategic and Executive Services after extensive discussion with the parliamentary staff supporting the Committee advises that their seems little point to request that the Committee reconsider this matter. A copy of the briefing papers relating to this report were provided to the Committee, and after discussion with the parliamentary staff it would further appear that the Committee would not support the proposed new clause relating to Estate fencing.

As a result it is suggested that Council proceed with the process of repealing Part 4 of the Local Law.

Statutory Compliance

The Local Government Act requires that any proposal to amend a local law which would be significantly different from what was first proposed, then the local government must recommence the procedure as if it was adopting a new local law.

Strategic Implications

The Private Property Local Law supports several strategic objectives and is supportive of the strategic goal of fostering an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure. Recent market research conducted by Hides Consulting Group in 2001 highlighted the concern the community have in the issue of graffiti management.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Council will incur additional costs in readvertising and gazettal of the proposed amendments to the local law.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ADVISE the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation that WHILST Council DOES NOT SUPPORT the required amendments to the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001 they acknowledge that they have no other option than to COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TO AMEND the Private Property Local Law 2001 as follows:

Repeal

· Part 4; and

· That part of the fifth Schedule referring to Part 4.

· Clause 5.2(2)

2. Until the amendment is finalised Council REFRAIN from ENFORCING Part 4 of the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001.

3. REQUEST the Western Australian Local Government Association support local government by further investigating with the Legislative Working Party the problems being experienced by local government when dealing with the Delegated Legislation Joint Standing Committee when adopting local laws.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CE04-07/02 Adoption Of Amendment To The City Of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law - Removal Of Elected Members Question Time

File Ref: 01369

File Name: CConofz1.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Daniel Simms Date 27 June 2002

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 19 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 19 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 19 June 2002

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the adoption of the amendment to the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law to remove Elected Members Question Time after the closing of the public notice period.

Background

Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on the 19^th March 2002 resolved as follows:

That Council in accordance with Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995, resolve to ADVERTISE the proposal to amend the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law 2000 for the purpose of deleting Clause 6.5 Questions from Elected Members and by further deleting the reference to Questions from Elected Members from Clause 5.4.1 Order of Business from the Standing Orders Local Law 2000.

A total of 66 written submissions (one of which contained 64 residents signatures – see Attachment 1) were received from the community objecting to the proposed amendment.

Detail

Sixty four copies of the following statement have been submitted to Council by a resident.

OBJECTION TO THE AMENDMENT

CLAUSE – 5.4.1 AND CLAUSE – 6.5 INCLUSIVE

Council has advertised to “AMEND” Standing Orders Local Law to “delete” Councillors Question Time.

Do you as a Ratepayer feel that our Elected Members should keep their allocated Question Time as their Democratic RIGHT?

Did you as a RATEPAYER vote your Councillors onto Council to keep the public well informed and practice OPEN AND ACCOUNTABLE GOVT. And to Stop the PERCEPTION OF SECRECY?

A resident submitted a written objection to the proposed amendment, which is detailed as Attachment 1. The residents’ ground for objection can be summarised as follows:

· Reduced accountability of the administration to the Elected Members and so to the community at large

· Contrary to the intent of the Local Government Act 1995

· Reduction in the rights of Elected Members and therefore a reduction in the rights of the general community.

Council has also received advice from the Wanneroo Ratepayers Association objecting to the proposed amendment. The Association did not provide grounds for the objection.

Consultation

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, Council has advertised the proposed amendment in the Wanneroo Times inviting comment within a 42 day period. Copies of the proposed amendment have been made available in all Council libraries, the Civic Centre and through Council’s website at www.wanneroo.wa.gov.au.

Comment

In relation to the public objections these can be categorised as follows:

1.0 Contrary to the intent of the Local Government Act 1995

Contained in the report provided by the Strategic Review Panel (which included representation from the Department of Local Government and Regional Development) the following comment was made in relation to Councillor Question Time:

Councillor Question Time – this should be removed from the agenda. All elected members can obtain information regarding issues and queries raised by ratepayers at other times rather than in ordinary meetings of council. It is a waste of time for all involved. It is an opportunity for “grandstanding” by elected members for no benefit except their own egos. It is also an opportunity to embarrass staff members who may not have enough details in front of them to answer a question.

It is considered that with the involvement of the Department of Local Government and Regional Development in the Strategic Review that the Department is supportive of the proposed amendment and therefore it is unlikely that the amendment would be deemed contrary to the intent of the Local Government Act 1995.

2.0 Accountablity of Administration and Rights of Elected Members

In relation to comments raised by objectors regarding the ability of Elected Members to raise issues with Administration, Council has several systems in place to assist Elected Members with information. These include:

Ø Councillor Enquiry System

Ø Council Briefing Sessions

Ø The Chief Executive Officer and Directors are available to meet with Elected Members between 4 – 6.00pm the Monday before each Council Briefing Session.

Ø General availability of Directors and Managers at all times

Ø Proclaim Action Request System

With the introduction of the new Proclaim Action Request System, customer enquiries, service requests and Councillor Enquiries will be electronically tracked.

The suggested amendment as detailed by the resident (as detailed in Attachment One) in relation to Questions with Due Notice may be worth further consideration if Council wishes to maintain Elected Members Question Time.

Statutory Compliance

Section 3.12(4) of the Local Government Act 1995 states:

After the last day for submissions, the local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from what was proposed.

*Special Majority

The City of Wanneroo Standing Orders clause 8.19.3 states:

A 75% majority is at least 75% of the number of elected members of Council whether or not:-

· There are vacancies; and

· All members are present and able to vote (ie 12 members)

NB A Special Majority is the same as a 75% majority.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Special Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council MAKE by a SPECIAL MAJORITY the amendment to the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law 2000 by deleting Clause 6.5 Questions from Elected Members and by further deleting the reference to Questions from Elected Members from Clause 5.4.1 Order of Business from the Standing Orders Local Law 2000.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE05-07/02 Local Government Postal Elections May 2003

File Ref: 29068

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

File Name: CLocGovP.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 17 June 2002

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To determine that the method of conducting the May 2003 Local Government Elections will be as a postal election and declare the Electoral Commissioner to be responsible for the conduct of the election.

Background

Since the formation on the new City of Wanneroo, Council has conducted all local government elections by way of a postal election with the Electoral Commissioner responsible for the conduct of the election.

In the May 2001 Biennial Elections, elections were carried out in 4 wards with 22,890 election packages circulated. A total of 7,908 packages were returned with a total of 7,741 ballot papers admitted to the count giving a participation rate of 33.82%.

A copy of a report prepared by the Western Australian Electoral Commission on the May 2002 Election is available in the Councillors Reading Room.

Detail

Under the Local Government Act Council is required to determine the method in which the local government election will be conducted. The Western Australian Electoral Commission has contacted all Councils advising that he has given his agreement to be responsible for the elections and is requesting advice form Council indicating if they would like the Commission to conduct the elections on behalf of Council.

The May 2003 election will, depending on number of nominations received involve a Mayoral election plus seven ward elections. This would involve the distribution of 50,674 election packages.

Council may decide either to conduct an in-person election or a postal election. If Council is to conduct a postal election, then the Western Australian Electoral Commission is the only permitted provider of this service.

Detailed in Attachment One is a list of Council’s that participated in postal elections in May 2001 for Council’s information.

Comment

It is estimated that the cost of conducting the May 2003 election by postal voting will be based on every ward and Mayoral seat being contested in the vicinity of $120,000.

Whilst the report does not detail a cost comparison to Council for an in-person election it is considered that the cost would be less than that of a postal election.

Results from local governments in general indicate that the participation rate is significantly higher in postal elections than in-person elections. Should Council wish to receive further information pertaining to the costs associated with in-person elections and participation rates a further report can be prepared.

Statutory Compliance

The Local Government Act 1995 details the procedure that must be followed in relation to elections and in particular:

1. Section 4.20(4) states that Council may subject to the written agreement from the Commissioner declare that the Commissioner be responsible for the conduct of the election.

2. Section 4.20(5) requires Council to declare this not less than 80 days before the election (14^th March 2003).

3. Section 4.61(1)(2) allows Council to decide on conducting an election as a postal election or as a voting in person election. The decision to conduct a postal election must be made by a special majority of Council.

4. Section 4.61 (4) states that the decision of Council to conduct a postal election has no effect unless Council declares that the Electoral Commissioner is responsible for the conduct of the election.

Strategic Implications

A key theme of the strategic plan is increasing community participation in Council activities. It is suggested that by conducting local government elections by postal voting, Council is making it very easy for the community to participate in the next local government elections.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The cost of the May 2001 Biennial postal elections conducted by the Western Australian Electoral Commission was $54,500 which equates to an average cost of $2 per circulated election package or $7 per actually conducted election package.

The estimated cost for the 2003 elections based on every ward being contested as well as the Mayoral seat is $120,000 based on the distribution of 50,674 election packages and a return rate of 50%.

This amount has been included in the draft 2002/03 budget together with an allowance for a referendum in the Mindarie Ward relating to traffic issues.

Voting Requirements

Special Majority & Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. DECLARE by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY in accordance with Section 4.20(4) of the Local Government Act 1995, the Electoral Commissioner to be responsible for the conduct of the May 2003 elections.

2. DECLARE by SPECIAL MAJORITY in accordance with Section 4.61(2) of the Local Government Act 1995, that the method of conducting the election will be as a postal election.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CE06-07/02 Municipal Workcare And Municipal Liability Scheme - Revisions To Scheme Rules.

File Ref: S/0082V01

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

File Name: CMunWora.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by D. Simms Date 20 June 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To accept the amendments to the Scheme Rules for the Municipal WorkCare and Municipal Liability Scheme.

Background

With the formation of the new Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) the Board of Management for Municipal WorkCare Scheme and the Municipal Liability Scheme have decided to amend the Scheme Rules to reflect the new Association name as well as various other amendments.

Detail

The changes to the rules can be summarised as follows:

· Substituting “Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA)” for Western Australian Municipal Association (WAMA) where it appears. This is a consequential amendment to resolutions carried by Association

· Changing the definition of “special resolution” in the Municipal WorkCare Scheme Rules to require an absolute majority decision of total members whether present or not. An absolute majority requirement is considered more appropriate, as the existing provision, which requires the unanimous vote of all Board members present at a meeting, effectively gives a right of veto to any individual Board member on matters of expulsion of a council from the Scheme or utilising Scheme funds for making loans, which in both cases also requires the approval of WALGA, or to admitting a body other than a Council into the Scheme.

· Within Clause 5.3 of the Muniicipal WorkCare Scheme Rules, requiring the delegation of any function being approved by an Absolute Majority decision of the Board (currently only an ordinary resolution is required).

· Within Clause 8.1 replacing “the Standards as prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia” with “accordance with generally accepted accounting principles”.

Comment

The Manager, Contracts & Property advises that the changes do not provide for any real change to the intent of the Scheme Rules and are recommended to Council for approval.

Statutory Compliance

Formal adoption of revisions to the Scheme Rules requires over 50% of Scheme members to indicate their support.

Strategic Implications

The purpose of membership of the WALGA Insurance Scheme is supportive of the corporate goal of Corporate Management and Development in relation to risk management.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council SUPPORT the changes to the Scheme Rules of the Municipal WorkCare Scheme and Municipal Liability Scheme as summarised below:

a) Substituting “Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA)” for Western Australian Municipal Association (WAMA) where it appears. This is a consequential amendment to resolutions carried by Association

b) Changing the definition of “special resolution” in the Municipal WorkCare Scheme Rules to require an absolute majority decision of total members whether present or not. An absolute majority requirement is considered more appropriate, as the existing provision, which requires the unanimous vote of all Board members present at a meeting, effectively gives a right of veto to any individual Board member on matters of expulsion of a council from the Scheme or utilising Scheme funds for making loans, which in both cases also requires the approval of WALGA, or to admitting a body other than a Council into the Scheme.

c) Within Clause 5.3 of the Municipal WorkCare Scheme Rules, requiring the delegation of any function being approved by an Absolute Majority decision of the Board (currently only an ordinary resolution is required).

d) Within Clause 8.1 replacing “the Standards as prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia” with “accordance with generally accepted accounting principles”.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Item 9 Motions on Notice

MN01-07/02 Cr Salpietro - Proposed Locality Name Change From Tapping To Carramar

File Ref: P/0024V01

Responsible Officer: Nil

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

File Name: ASalpiet.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 2 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Level 1 Approval by sb Date 17 June 2002

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Consideration of a proposal to change the locality name of Tapping between Joondalup Drive and Clarkson Avenue to Carramar.

Background

The Carramar Golf Course Estate (CGCE) extends across the alignment of Joondalup Drive, which forms the current boundary between the localities of Carramar and Tapping. This estate will also extend east of the future north/south regional road alignment (new Pinjar Road), which forms the boundary between the localities of Carramar and Banksia Grove.

Attachment 1 outlines the current boundaries of the localities of Carramar, Tapping and Banksia Grove, the extent of the CGCE and the portion of Tapping subject to the name change proposal.

Detail

The Carramar Residents Association (CRA) has recently undertaken a survey of all CGCE properties in Tapping to ascertain the level of support to change that part of the locality north of Clarkson Avenue to Carramar. The CRA has advised that it undertook a questionnaire, posing three questions to 170 households in Tapping, north of Clarkson Avenue in April/May 2002. A further questionnaire to the 9 properties in Tapping, south of Clarkson Avenue was also distributed on the 12 May 2002. Approximately 295 housing lots have been created to date in Tapping, north of Clarkson Avenue.

The questionnaire asked:

Q1 Do you support a name change for the residential area (as above) of Tapping?

Q2 If yes, do you support a name change to Carramar?

Q3 If you support a name change, but not to Carramar, can you suggest 3 other names in order of preference?

The CRA advised that a total of 140 responses were received. Of this:

· 95% of respondents (133) gave support for a name change;

· 5% of respondents (7) were opposed to a name change;

· Of those supporting a name change, 93.5% (129) gave support to a name change to Carramar, with the remaining 1.5% (2) suggesting a name change to St Stephens.

Comment

The CRA has advised that it considers the following benefits of a change to Carramar from Tapping:

· Supporting and strengthening the sense of community that currently exists between residents of Carramar and the developed portion of Tapping;

· Enhancing the identify of the area, as Carramar is well established and recognised in the region;

· Reflecting both communities sharing existing and future community facilities such as St Stephens School, golf course and future community building, sports ovals and neighbourhood shopping area;

· Logical, as it is in keeping with the way the area is developing;

· Generating a sense of belonging rather than separation;

· Simplifying postal delivery issues.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. SUPPORTS the request by the Carramar Residents Association to change the locality name of Tapping (north of Clarkson Avenue) to Carramar, as indicated on Attachment 1 to this report;

2. FORWARDS this proposal to the Geographic Names Committee of the Department of Land Administration.

City Administration Comment

Locality Planning

Locality boundaries are normally located along a clearly identifiable boundary, such as a major road. If the locality boundaries were changed as requested, the new locality boundary would run along Clarkson Avenue which is a local distributor road and in the future, is in part proposed to be realigned at its eastern, central and western ends under the East Wanneroo Cell 1 draft Local Structure Plan. This realignment will result in the locality boundary running through open space and residential lots and therefore would again have to be modified in the future. This would have the effect of alienating that part of the CGCE community currently in Tapping.

Timing

It is largely the marketing of the Carramar Golf Course Estate and the fact Joondalup Drive is yet to be fully constructed, which has resulted in the community perception that has lead to this request for a locality name change. However, when viewed in light of the ultimate planned development of the area, the current locality boundaries are appropriate as:

1. Joondalup Drive will be a major east-west regional road, linking Neaves Road to Wanneroo Road and the coast. Once constructed and carrying high levels of traffic, it will be functionally the logical boundary to communities on either side.

2. Clarkson Avenue will be a local distributor road and be will be partially realigned at its eastern, central and western ends. This type of road is not normally viewed as a significant or logical locality boundary and will be likely to cause confusion in the future if the proposal succeeds.

3. Once the Carramar Golf Course Estate has been fully developed, marketing of the name will cease and over time with on-selling of houses, the community will identify more with the locality of Tapping.

Precedent

Most of the developing urban areas of East Wanneroo are in fragmented ownership. Many of the localities are being developed by a number of different developers, each of which market their estates under different names.

Changing the boundary of Carramar/Tapping in this instance, based on the present partially developed nature of the area and in accordance with the extent of the developers landholding, without a proper consideration of the ultimate planning for the area will set a precedent for similar name changes in other parts of the City. In particular the CGCE landholding also extends into the locality of Banksia Grove (refer Attachment 1) and given the marketing of the overall estate, it is likely that there will be similar pressure to alter the locality boundary of Carramar and Banksia Grove in the future.

Process

The Geographic Names Committee (GNC) of the Department of Land Administration (DOLA) is the determining authority in respect to locality name changes. The GNC will normally require evidence of strong resident support, Council agreement and conformity with its guidelines before it will endorse a change.

The proposal complies with the GNC’s guidelines except that the locality boundary guideline which requires boundaries to be established along natural boundaries (such as a river), roads or local government boundaries. As indicated above, under the draft East Wanneroo Cell 1 Local Structure Plan portions of the western, central and eastern parts of Clarkson Avenue are proposed to be realigned which will result in the locality boundary dissecting a proposed area of open space and some residential lots. If Council were to support the proposal, it would need to rationalise the boundary again in the future when the future alignment of Clarkson Avenue has been set.

Conclusion

In time, Joondalup Drive will be extended and become a major barrier between the two localities, the Carramar estate marketing will cease, residential development will proceed to the south of Clarkson Avenue and residents will begin to identify with this community.

When the area is fully developed, the present locality boundaries will be seen as the logical boundaries for the respective communities. Extending the Carramar locality to Clarkson Avenue will result in a boundary along a relatively minor road, which will lead to confusion in the future when this area is subdivided.

On the basis of these factors, Administration does not support the proposed locality name change.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Item 10 Urgent Business

Nil.

Item 11 Confidential

C01-07/02 Confidential Item - Renaming Of Hudson Park Clubrooms - Girrawheen

File Ref: 21140

File Name: BARenofH.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 28 May 2002

Level 2 Approval by bj Date 06 May 2002

Level 1 Approval by bj Date 06 May 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 2

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:

· (b) the personal affairs of any person

Item 12 Date of Next Meeting

The next Councillors Briefing Session has been scheduled for 7.00pm on Tuesday 16 July 2002, to be held at the Council Administration Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.

	Quinns Rocks		Burns Beach		Fremantle Village		Woodman Point		Wanneroo
	Daily	Weekly	Daily	Weekly	Daily	Weekly	Daily	Weekly	Daily	Weekly
Peak Periods
Tent site (unpowered)	$17.00	$102.00	$18.00	$108.00	$19.00	$120.00	$24.00	$168.00	N/A	N/A
Un-powered site	$17.00	$102.00	$18.00		$21.50	$136.50			N/A	N/A
Powered site	$19.50	$117.00	$23.00	$120.00	$23.50	$148.00	$25.00	$175.00	$17.60	$85.00
On-site vans	$55.00	$140.00	$90-$105	$630-$770	$31-$102	$191-$658	$74-$130	$518-$910	$25-$35	$85-$130



Non-Peak Periods					N/A	N/A
Tent site (unpowered)	$17.00	$102.00	$16.00	$96.00	Same price all year - One price raise at end of year		$17.00	$117.00	N/A	N/A
Un-powered site	$17.00	$102.00							N/A	N/A
Powered site	$19.50	$117.00	$21.00	$108.00			$19.00	$136.00	$17.60	$85.00
On-site vans	$35.00	$110.00	$85-$105	$595-$735			$62-$125	$434-$875


Permanent Residents
Single		$58.00
Double		$63.00		$87.00		$120-$290		$86.85		$74.00
Visitors					Extra $36 p/week for more than 2 people		Extra $9 p/n for more than 2 people		All sites are submetered
					Extra $36 p/week for more than 2 people		Extra $9 p/n for more than 2 people		All sites are submetered

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT


	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Expenditure

Operating Expenditure	16,580,535	17,077,951	17,590,289	18,117,998
Capital Expenditure	5,813,550	5,987,957	6,167,595	6,352,623

Total Expenditure	22,394,085	23,065,907	23,757,885	24,470,621

Less Non Cash Expenditure	2,644,829	2,724,174	2,805,899	2,890,076

Total Cash Expenditure	19,749,256	20,341,734	20,951,986	21,580,545

Funding Source

Government Grants, Subsidies	2,193,647	2,259,456	2,327,240	2,397,057
Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	4,547,703	4,684,134	4,824,658	4,969,398
Proceeds from Disposal Asset	0	0	0	0
City Funded	13,007,906	13,398,143	13,800,087	14,214,090

Total Funds Available	19,749,256	20,341,734	20,951,986	21,580,545

Capital Expenditure Summary

Acquisition and replacement of plant and fleet	573,750	506,350	689,350	656,850
Building improvements/construction and land acquisition	5,239,800	5,396,994	5,558,904	5,725,671

Total Capital Expenditure	5,813,550	5,903,344	6,248,254	6,382,521

Key Success Factor	Measure	Indicator	Current State	2002 Target	2003 Target	2004 Target
Organisational Management	Adoption of the Budget in July 2002	Adoption by Council by 31 August – in line with Statutory Requirement.	Met – 10 August 2001	14 July 2002	17 July 2003	17 July 2004
Organisational Management	Annual Financial Statements	Delivery to Auditors by 30 September each year.	Met – 30 September 2001	Mid-Sept. 2002	Mid-September 2003	Mid-September 2004
Organisational Management	Obtaining Unqualified Audit Report	Unqualified Audit Report received.	Target met 2000/2001 (October 2001)	October 2002	October 2003	October 2004
Organisational Management	Proper monitoring of contracts	Six monthly contract performance monitoring and timely notification to clients of contract expiry and renewal.	85% of contracts to have contractor performance reports completed every six months	85% of contracts to have contractor performance reports completed every six months	90% of contracts to have contractor performance reports completed every six months	90% of contracts to have contractor performance reports completed every six months
Organisational Management	Purchasing and Stores	Distribute a purchasing survey to ascertain clients’ needs in relation to implementing a centralised system of obtaining quotations.	De-centralised purchasing	Implement survey recommendations with a view to begin purchasing centralisation	Begin purchasing centralisation	Centralised purchasing
Organisational Management	Property Services – Effective property management	Establish a database of lessees and lessors obligations and timely lease renewal.	No centralised matrix of rent reviews and insurance renewals for lessees obligations	90% compliance of lessees obligations	95% compliance of lessees obligations	100% compliance of lessees obligations
Organisational Management	General Insurance	Timely co-ordination and monitoring of insurance claims and inquires by regular reporting.	Claims sent to insurer and acknowledgement to the claimant with 48 hours of receipt	90% of claims sent to insurer and acknowledgement to the claimant with 48 hours of receipt	95% of claims sent to insurer and acknowledgement to the claimant with 48 hours of receipt	100% of claims sent to insurer and acknowledgement to the claimant with 48 hours of receipt
Organisational Management	Percentage of helpdesk calls reduced through the provision of training	Reduction in the percentage of helpdesk calls as a result of lack of training.	40%	Reduce by 5% per year	Reduce by 5% per year	Reduce by 5% per year
Organisational Management	Increase utilisation of corporate records reporting	Volume of electronic documents stored and number of users.	5% of potential user base actually use present system	50% users	80% users	95% users
Organisational Management	Number of Loss Time Injuries as a percentage of hours worked		31 loss time accidents per million hrs worked for 2000/01	28	20	10
Organisational Management	Monthly Reports to Managers on up-coming Performance Reviews	By end of each month.	100%	100%	100%	100%
Organisational Management	Quarterly Reports on Recruitment Lead Times (date from resignation to date of appointment letter)		10 weeks	8 weeks	6 weeks	6 weeks
Organisational Management	Quarterly Reports on Percentage of training actively aligned to strategic goals		Unknown	70%	80%	98%

CORPORATE SERVICES


	2002/03	2003/04	2004/05	2005/06

Expenditure

Operating Expenditure	8,281,928	8,530,386	8,786,298	9,049,887
Capital Expenditure	-	-	110,000	18,000

Total Expenditure	8,281,928	8,530,386	8,896,298	9,067,887

Less Non Cash Expenditure	2,173,383	2,238,585	2,305,742	2,374,915

Total Cash Expenditure	6,108,545	6,291,801	6,590,555	6,692,972

Funding Source

Government Grants, Subsidies	33,990	35,010	36,060	37,142
Fines, Penalties, User and Other Income	447,793	461,226	475,063	489,315
Proceeds from Disposal Asset	301,221	310,258	319,566	329,153
City Funded	5,325,541	5,485,307	5,759,866	5,837,362

Total Funds Available	6,108,545	6,291,801	6,590,555	6,692,972

Capital Expenditure Summary

Acquisition and replacement of plant and fleet	-	-	110,000	18,000
Building improvements/construction and land acquisition	-	-	-	-

Total Capital Expenditure	0	0	110,000	18,000

Key Success Factor	Key Performance Measure	Key Performance Indicator	Current State	2002 Target	2003 Target	2004 Target
Environment	Implementation of key environmental objectives	Completion of various strategies and stakeholder feedback	No overall strategy relating to the environment in place	Draft Local Environment Strategy to be finalised Agreed actions commenced	Agreed actions completed	Agreed actions completed –
Community	Community consultation	Level of community feedback in decision making process	No Community Consultation Policy	Community Consultation Policy adopted and resourced
Community	Land Development Unit (LDU) stakeholder participation	Level of stakeholder attendance at Land Development Unit meetings and feedback
Economic Development	Partnerships and alliances with Stakeholders	Stakeholder satisfaction	No Economic Development Strategy	Economic Development Plan and Employment Policy completed
Organisational Management	Customer Service	Increase trend in Customer Satisfaction	No Customer Service Charter	Adopt Customer Service Charter	Increase level of Customer satisfaction	Increase level of Customer satisfaction