A G E N D A

Item 1 Attendance

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item 3 Reports

Planning and Development

Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans

1. Close of Advertising: Amendment No. 9 To City Of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2

File Ref: TPS/0009

File Name: BAAmend9.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 8

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of submissions received following close of advertising of proposed Amendment No. 9 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2).

Applicant	N/A
Owner	Peet and Company Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust
Location	Lot 9002, Clarkson Avenue, Tapping
Site Area	244.3142 ha
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development

Background

At its meeting of 18 December 2001 (item LR01-12/01), Council resolved to prepare Amendment No. 9 to DPS2 to include the presently unsubdivided balance of the Peet & Co. landholding within Carramar and Tapping as a new East Wanneroo Cell (No. 9) to be subject to infrastructure contribution arrangements consistent with the existing arrangements for Cells 1 to 8 in East Wanneroo. This was essentially to enable the City to construct Joondalup Drive from its present eastern end within the Carramar locality to the northern boundary of the Peet & Co. landholding within a much shorter timeframe than has been indicated by the developer pursuant to a legal agreement which presently exists between the developer and this City.

At its meeting of 19 March 2002 (item PD07-03/02) Council considered advice from the WA Planning Commission that it consented to the advertising of Amendment No. 9 for public submissions, subject to a number of modifications being made (to its satisfaction) to the Amendment document. Council resolved to proceed with Amendment No. 9 and to make the modifications required by the Commission. The Amendment documents were accordingly modified and submitted to the Commission for it to confirm that the modifications had been satisfactorily undertaken.

On 19 June 2002, the Commission advised that the modifications had been satisfactorily undertaken and that advertising of Amendment No. 9 could proceed.

Detail

Advertising of Amendment No. 9 was undertaken for a 42 day period (as required by the Commission) which concluded on 6 August 2002.

Consultation

The amendment was advertised by means of:

· advertisements placed in the local newspapers;

· on-site signs placed on Joondalup Drive in Carramar, and on Pinjar Road, just south of the Banksia Grove residential area;

· letters sent to the main landowners involved, being Peet & Co. and Homeswest

· letters sent to the following agencies (as required by the Commission): Main Roads Western Australia; Education Department; Ministry for Housing.

Comment

Twenty four submissions have been received in response to the advertising of Amendment No. 9. The following summarises the submissions received and includes comments and recommendations in respect to each submission.

Submission 1

Summary:

The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who agrees with the proposed amendment.

Comment:

Consistent with Council’s decision to seek amendment.

Recommendation:

That this submission be upheld.

Submission 2

Summary:

The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports the amendment as it will be a lot quicker and safer to travel to Joondalup via the extension of Joondalup Drive.

Comment:

Travel from Banksia Grove to Joondalup (presumably referring to the Joondalup City Centre) will indeed be made quicker and safer through the provision of the Joondalup Drive link to Banksia Grove

Recommendation:

That this submission be upheld.

Submission 3

Summary:

The submittor lives in the Lake Adams Special Rural area who advises that as a resident of the Pinjar Road area, the submittor has witnessed the increasing traffic on Pinjar Road with the attendant dangers and noise. The submittor supports Amendment No. 9 which is aimed at expediting the completion of the Joondalup Drive extension.

Comment:

Early extension of Joondalup Drive (enabled by Amendment No. 9) will assist in reducing the problems referred to in relation to Pinjar Road.

Recommendation:

That this submission be upheld.

Submission 4

Summary:

Main Roads Western Australia advises that it has no objection to Amendment No. 9.

Comment:

This submission is in response to the City’s referral to it of the proposed amendment as required by the WA Planning Commission.

Recommendation:

That this submission be noted.

Submission 5

Summary:

A letter has been received from solicitors Phillips Fox, on behalf of Peet & Co. This asserts (amongst other things) that Amendment No. 9 is not a proper or valid exercise of the City’s powers; that it is consequently ultra vires (beyond the power of the City); and an undertaking is therefore sought that the City will take immediate steps to withdraw the amendment.

The reasons for the above assertion are given in the letter from Phillips Fox which forms Attachment 1 to this report. A subsequent letter from Phillips Fox (refer Attachment 2) provides further information by the submittor.

Comment:

Amendment No. 9 is not considered ultra vires and the reason for this is given in the City’s response to Phillips Fox which forms Attachment 3 to this report. Advice is also currently being sought from Council’s legal advisors and Council shall be informed of the advice received as soon as it is available.

It may be noted in the attached exchange of letters that Peet & Co. objects strongly to the view expressed in the Scheme Amendment Report that Peet & Co. has been undertaking a subdivision staging strategy which has had the effect of not ‘triggering’ the legal agreement obligations which require that construction of Joondalup Drive be undertaken at the time that the land is subdivided abutting the road. The City’s letter of reply advises of this City’s concern that Peet & Co. has taken such umbrage on this matter, and that as the subject of the statement is not central to the rationale for the proposed amendment, the City would be willing to consider deleting this paragraph from the Scheme Amendment Report.

A statement made in the Phillips Fox letter dated 5 August 2002 (refer Attachment 2) is also considered to warrant particular comment. Paragraph 4 of that letter includes a statement that: “My client does not accept that sufficient justification has been given for proceeding at this stage with a link to Banksia Grove as this area is already well serviced with road connections, and the purported justifications for the amendment do not withstand close analysis.” The Amendment Report includes the following description of benefits seen to be associated with the early construction of the Joondalup Drive link and this is considered to provide sufficient justification on the matter:

“1. It will provide Banksia Grove residents with a more direct and safer route to Wanneroo Road and to Joondalup Drive (west of Wanneroo Road) which in turn will mean easier access to the Joondalup City Centre and its many facilities and services, the northern suburbs railway and the Mitchell Freeway.

2. It will provide a quicker and safer route for buses serving Banksia Grove.

3. It will reduce the amount of traffic needing to use Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue, both of which are presently not constructed to a standard suitable for carrying high traffic volumes. This will mean a reduced likelihood of serious traffic accidents on these roads.

4. It will provide a further route for traffic associated with Barbagallo Raceway, especially on major race days which presently create significant traffic congestion along Pinjar Road. This in turn presents emergency vehicle access problems which have been identified in recent risk assessment studies as urgently requiring resolving.

5. It will provide an additional emergency access route for both the Banksia Grove and Carramar residential areas, particularly in the event of threat of bush fire.

6. It will mean that the Education Department will be able to deal with the Carramar and Banksia Grove estates as a more effective potential primary school catchment when it comes to plan the provision of a permanent primary school to serve those locations. (Banksia Grove primary school children are currently served by a ‘school-in-houses’ in Banksia Grove; Carramar primary school children are currently served by the Wanneroo Junior Primary School and Wanneroo Primary School).”

Recommendation:

1. Dismiss the request concerning withdrawal of the amendment.

2. Modify the Scheme Amendment Report to delete the following paragraph:

“As noted above, the legal agreement applying to this area only requires construction of a major road when abutting subdivision is being undertaken. Peet & Co. are now pursuing a subdivision staging strategy whereby they are subdividing land which does not abut Joondalup Drive, thereby avoiding any legal obligation to construct this road at this time”.

Submission 6

Summary:

The Transperth section of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure supports the amendment for the reasons given in Attachment 4.

Comment:

The improvements to the level of public transport service referred to in the submission would be of considerable benefit to the residents of Banksia Grove, and should also benefit Carramar residents.

Recommendation:

That this submission be upheld.

Submission 7

Summary:

The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports Amendment No. 9 because:

1. Joondalup Drive will be a far safer route when travelling between Banksia Grove and Joondalup;

2. Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue are similar to country roads with problems such as poor visibility at night, soft edges and kangaroos;

3. Joondalup Drive would provide a quicker route to Joondalup in the event of family member needing hospital assistance;

4. Travelling an indirect route to Joondalup (as at present) results in a waste of valuable petrol.

5. The intersection of Tumbleweed Drive and Pinjar Road is extremely dangerous with the increased amount of traffic having to use those roads in the absence of the Joondalup Drive link.

Comment:

The above reasons for supporting the amendment are considered valid. The matter of the intersection of Tumbleweed Drive and Pinjar Road is commented upon further in the assessment of Submission No. 9.

Recommendation:

That the submission be upheld.

Submission 8

Summary:

The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports Amendment No. 9 because:

1. At the time of buying a property in Banksia Grove 6 years ago, the real estate agent concerned advised that the Joondalup Drive link would be in place in 2-3 years from that time.

2. In the 6 years living in Banksia Grove, have observed two major bush fires, many fatal car accidents, many native animals being killed on the roads: all because of poor roads planning.

3. The safety of Banksia Grove residents needs to be considered.

Comment:

The above reasons for support of the amendment are considered valid.

Recommendation:

That this submission be upheld.

Submission 9

Summary:

Peet & Co. has lodged a submission which strongly objects to the proposed amendment. A copy of the submission forms Attachment 5 to this report. This submission includes an assessment undertaken by engineers Halpern Glick Maunsel (HGM). (Note that City Administration has numbered the paragraphs in the Peet & Co submission for ease of reference)

Comment:

Paras 1-2: Peet & Co. correctly describes the relevant obligations under the Deed and the City’s wish for the road extension to occur faster than would occur under the Deed.

Para 3: Although the road extension may not have been seen by Landstart to be of high enough priority to justify it in meeting the amount of additional cost which would have been entailed in the proposals put to it by Peet & Co., the road extension is seen as a high priority by those who have signed the petitions on the subject received by the City, and by the submittors who support the amendment.

Paras 4 – 5: Council originally sought to include the large proposed urban landholdings north of Clarkson Avenue into the developer contribution system for the total East Wanneroo urban area. However, the then Minister for Planning and the then State Planning Commission did not allow this and instead required that these broadacre areas be excluded from such a system and instead made them subject of a separate deed between the developers and the City.

During the Commission’s and Minister’s deliberations on this matter, they were no doubt influenced by a submission from the developer which indicated that inclusion of its landholding in the East Wanneroo scheme was not necessary as they intended to enter into their own deed to ensure equitable and timely development of district roads. In the City’s opinion, this has not been the case.

Other high priority areas are the subject of similar developer contribution systems as proposed under Amendment No. 9:

· Marmion Avenue is the subject of the Clarkson-Butler district distributor road infrastructure contribution arrangements (Part 11 of DPS2):

· Ocean Reef Road (to Landsdale) is included as a Cell Work for East Wanneroo Cell 8.

Paras 6 & 9: The Landstart landholding has not been included within the Cell boundary, and the unconstructed portion of Joondalup Drive situated within the Landstart land has not been included as a Cell Work, because Landstart has advised that it will construct the portion of the road within its land once the road has been constructed to its southern boundary.

Paras 7-8: It is agreed that it would be appropriate that the adequacy of the present Pinjar Road-Tumbleweed Drive intersection be reviewed once the timeframe for construction of the Joondalup Drive link is clarified.

Regarding a broader road construction programme being put in place, at this time, the immediate priority is Joondalup Drive and this is where efforts should be focussed. However, it is agreed that in due course it will be desirable for a broader programme to be developed. This would possibly be when Peet & Co. come closer to developing adjacent to the future deviation of Pinjar Road. The linking of the Pinjar Road deviation to Joondalup Drive would be likely to be coordinated with the linking of Joondalup Drive into Neaves Road, and the downgrading (with road closures) of Pinjar Road between Tumbleweed Drive and Neaves Road. These changes will also take the pressure off the Pinjar Road-Tumbleweed Drive intersection.

Para 10: As noted in the earlier assessment of submission 5, it is recommended that the comment currently included in the Scheme Amendment Report regarding Peet & Co.’s staging strategy be deleted.

Paras 13 & 14: [Waiting for Tech. Services assessment of traffic engineering comment].

Regarding the comments made concerning impacts on the economy of the City of Wanneroo and revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre (through it being made easier for Banksia Grove residents to access the Joondalup City Centre, it is agreed that such impacts may occur. However, in cases such as this, a balance must be made between the interests of the local community concerned and the district as a whole and in this case, it is considered that it would be unreasonable and unfair for the Banksia Grove community to seek to deprive them of the perceived benefits of the road link.

It is noted that para 14. does not address the issue of safety mentioned in para 13.

Para 15: Assessment of submission 6 addresses this issue.

Paras 17 – 20: [Waiting for Tech. Services assessment]

Paras 21 & 22: While the provision of the Joondalup Drive link concerned may well not assist in reducing remaining access problems on the northern part of Pinjar Road for traffic travelling to the raceway, it should still assist with management of traffic travelling from the raceway by providing an additional route from Pinjar Road to Wanneroo Road (and then to the freeway).

Paras 23 & 24: While it is difficult to assess if the present number of emergency access routes is indeed sufficient or not, it is considered fair to say that the provision of additional routes is still a desirable objective.

Regarding the future provision of a properly constructed road link from Coogee Road to Franklin Road, such a link will occur in the future, possibly in conjunction with the development of the land adjacent to the presently unconstructed section. It is agreed that such a future link will also provide a useful emergency access function.

Paras 25 & 26: Paragraph 25 has an error in reason No. 6, in that the wording in ‘brackets’ should read: “(Banksia Grove primary school children are currently served by a ‘school-in-houses’, in Banksia Grove; Carramar primary school children are currently served by the Wanneroo Junior Primary school and Wanneroo Primary School)”.

Para 27: The reasons for seeking this amendment are still considered to be valid and are considered to justify this amendment.

Recommendation:

That this submission be dismissed.

Submission 10

Summary:

John Chapman Town Planning Consultant has made a submission on behalf of Peet & Co./ATF the Yatala Nominees Pty Ltd Unit Trust, a copy of which forms Attachment 6 to this report.

Comment:

The points made in this submission are largely the same as those made in Submission 9 and the comments made upon Submission 9 are therefore generally also applicable to Submission 10. The following points made in Submission 10 are however considered to warrant particular comment:

· Section 3), para 4: It is agreed that Joondalup Drive is currently being extended in accordance with the agreement, however this is not considered ‘timely’, as the road link to Banksia Grove is considered to be required as soon as possible for the reasons dealt with in the previous assessment of Submission 9.

· Section 3), para 5: The current extension of Joondalup Drive to Walburg Drive is not considered to materially affect the basis upon which Amendment No. 9 is seen to be needed.

· Section 6): The statement made in the Scheme Amendment Report which is presumably the subject of the concern expressed in this comment is as follows: “These negotiations have now proved to be unsuccessful in respect to Peet & Co., and it is apparent that the City must pursue an alternative option if this road is to be constructed in the foreseeable future”.

To allay the submittor’s concern regarding Council not being accurately informed on this matter, Attachment 7 is a copy of correspondence received from Landstart in December 2001 which describes the pre-funding proposal of Peet & Co.’s considered by Landstart at that time, and Landstart’s position on it.

· Section 7): The section of Clause 10.3 of DPS2 referred to by the submittor states: “Within each Cell, Cell Works will be undertaken for the benefit of land contained within the Cell as generally set out in Schedule 9”.

Cell Works such as regional roads will in reality benefit not just the residents of the Cell which is meeting the cost of their provision, but also the regional community at large, as such roads are of course used to a significant degree also by that broader community.

In the case of the proposed Joondalup Drive link, it is acknowledged that the Banksia Grove community will benefit, however this will also extend to the Carramar community.

It is considered that Carramar residents will receive benefits as referred to in the assessment of Submission No. 5 (ie. Schools provision; public transport improvement; emergency access improvement – particularly if a major bushfire approached Carramar from Neerabup National Park to the west)

· Section 8): If a primary school is indeed built in Carramar in 2003 or 2004, such a school will be much more readily accessible to Banksia Grove through the Joondalup Drive link.

· Section 9): The Attachment 4 plans included in the Scheme Amendment Report showed the constructed extent of Joondalup Drive, and subdivision releases, at the time that Council initiated Amendment No. 9, in December 2001.

Recommendation:

That this submission be dismissed.

Submission 11

Summary:

This submission is lodged by the Yatala Unit Holders Advisory Committee and a copy of it is included as Attachment No. 8.

Comment:

The issues raised by the Committee have been addressed in the comments made on Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.

Recommendation:

That this submission be dismissed.

Submission 12-15

Summary:

These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:

“When we bought into the Carramar Estate, we enquired about the construction timetable of Joondalup Drive and were informed that it would be built in stages, as the estate grew. We understood that this timetable was legally binding on the developer, Peet and Company and the Council.

We were happy with this arrangement as we understood that it would be several years before the road was connected. We do not believe through traffic using Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue has increased significantly since we have lived here and consequently we do not see any changed circumstances which justify changing the original timetable”.

Comment:

These issues have been dealt with in the assessment of Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.

Recommendation:

That these submissions be dismissed.

Submissions 16-18

Summary:

These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:

“Peet and Company have gone to a lot of trouble and expense landscaping the sections of Joondalup Drive they have constructed. We understand that Council has no intention of doing similar landscaping along the proposed extension of Joondalup Drive. The road will become an eyesore and a source of dust and nuisance to residents, particularly in the early summer mornings when the easterly winds are strongest”.

Comment:

Although it is indeed unlikely that the City would undertake the level of landscaping that Peet & Co. has undertaken, the City would need to undertake a landscape treatment which prevented the area concerned from being an eyesore or a source of dust and nuisance to residents.

Recommendation:

That these submissions be dismissed.

Submissions 19 & 20

Summary:

These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:

“The progressive extension of Joondalup Drive as the adjoining subdivision occurs makes a lot of sense from a noise pollution aspect as the adjoining residential activity will hide traffic noise to some extent. If on the other hand the road is connected through the bush in advance of the adjoining housing there will be no other sound to obscure the highway sound. Traffic noise as it speeds through the area will be very loud and will cause disturbance and annoyance to Carramar residents.

Being an undeveloped area it will inadvertently generate speeding as the road will be of a high standard in a bush setting”.

Comment:

The absence of residential development adjacent to the eastern portion of the proposed road link should make little difference to the noise levels experienced by the residential areas themselves.

There may indeed be a temptation for traffic to speed due to the absence of residential development on adjacent land however extra policing measures can be undertaken to alleviate this.

Recommendation:

That these submissions be dismissed.

Submissions 21-24

These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:

“The cost of constructing this road at this time is not justified by the low traffic volumes on the existing roads. Although it is noted that the cost will be passed on to the developers, it is still a waste of money to build an expensive road before it is justified or wanted by the residents.

The report talks about improving traffic congestion to and from the Barbagallo Raceway. Why should Carramar residents be burdened with this extra noise, particularly after race meetings as everyone tries to speed home?”

Comment:

The issues regarding cost and need for the road link have been addressed in the assessment of Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.

Regarding the issues raised associated with traffic leaving Barbagallo Raceway, as noted previously, this road link should assist in allowing such traffic to get to Wanneroo Road and to the freeway further to the west.

This is a proper function of such a road, and as noted in respect to Submission Nos 19 and 20, temptations for drivers to speed on this road should be able to be addressed through an adequate level of policing.

Recommendation:

That these submissions be dismissed.

Other Comments:

1. As has been noted in Submission No. 10 from John Chapman Town Planning Consultant, at the time that Amendment No. 9 was initiated in December 2001, Joondalup Drive had been constructed as far east as Cheriton Drive in Carramar. Peet & Co. is currently extending the road a further 350m east, to its proposed intersection with Waldburg Drive.

2. Further examination of the current DPS2 provisions (since the initiation of Amendment No, 9) has indicated that the amendment should include provision for modification of Clause 9.12.7 of DPS2 (relating to appeal provisions) to include reference to proposed Cell No. 9, to maintain a consistency in approach between proposed Cell 9 and the existing East Wanneroo Cells.

3. Although only a relatively small number of submissions supporting this amendment have been received, Council would be aware that several petitions have been received, seeking the early construction of Joondalup Drive. It would be appropriate for Council to be mindful of this in considering the submissions received, and should Council resolve to adopt the amendment, it would also be appropriate for Council to remind the WA Planning Commission and the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure of these petitions.

Statutory Compliance

The advertising of Amendment No. 9 has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations, 1967 (as amended).

Pursuant to regulations 17(1)(a) and 25 (1)(fb), Council is required to consider the submissions received within 42 days of the close of advertising period, which will be 17 September 2002.

Strategic Implications

The early provision of the Joondalup Drive link to Banksia Grove will be supportive of the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan which refers to the provision of quality services and infrastructure.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The letter from Phillips Fox has raised the possibility of Peet & Co. taking legal action against this City, with its attendant financial implications. Advice on this matter is consequently currently being sought from the City’s legal advisors.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17 (2):

a) MODIFIES Amendment No.9 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:

i) include provision for Clause 9.12.7 of the Scheme to be amended by changing reference to “… Cells 1-8….” to “… Cells 1-9…”;

ii) delete the following paragraph from the Scheme Amendment Report:

b) ADOPTS Amendment No. 9, as modified to:

i) Change Part 9 of the Scheme by changing Clause 9.12.7 by deleting reference to “… Cells 1-8…” and replacing it with a reference to “…Cells 1-9”.

ii) Change Part 10 of the Scheme by:

A) deleting all references to ‘Cells 1 to 8’ and replacing each with a reference to ‘Cells 1 to 9’; and

B) in Clauses 10.6.1 to 10.6.4, deleting all references to ‘Cells 1 to 6’ and replacing each with a reference to ‘Cells 1 to 6 and Cell 9’; and

C) in Clause 10.11.2 (b), deleting reference to ‘Cells 1-6’ and replacing it with a reference to ‘Cells 1 to 6 and Cell 9’; and

D) in Clause 10.11.3, deleting reference to ‘8 Cells’ and replacing it with a reference to ‘9 Cells’.

iii) Change Schedule 9 of the Scheme by:

A) deleting all references to ‘Cells 1 to 8’ and replacing each with a reference to ‘Cells 1 to 9’; and

B) in Section 1.0, deleting reference to ‘eight (8)’ and replacing it with a reference to ‘nine (9)’; and

C) including the following at the end of the Schedule:

‘Cell 9

Joondalup Drive (between Cheriton Drive and the southern boundary of Lot 494 Tree Court, Banksia Grove)

* 100% of the total cost to acquire the ultimate road reserve land;

* 100% of the total cost of constructing the full earthworks, one carriageway and all structures’.

2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (1)(g), AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the amendment documentation.

3. ENDORSES the comments and recommendations made in this report regarding the submissions received on Amendment No. 9

4. REQUIRES that in submitting the amendment documents to the WA Planning Commission, City Administration advises the Commission that although only a relatively small number of submissions have been received in response to advertising of this amendment, a number of petitions have previously been received which demonstrate a high degree of community support for the early construction of Joondalup Drive through to Banksia Grove, such early construction being enabled through Amendment No. 9.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

PAGE 1 OF 2

ATTACHMENT 1

PAGE 2 OF 2

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE 1 OF 2

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE 2 OF 2

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

File Ref:

ATTACHMENT 3

PAGE 1 OF 3

TPS /0009V01 (11398)

Your Ref:

BRM:PMQ:842719

Enquiries:

Phil Thompson

30 July 2002

Phillips Fox

GPO Box F338

PERTH WA 6841

Dear Sir

PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO CITY OF WANNEROO DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO. 2 (DPS2)

I refer to your letter of 25 July 2002 and to the telephone discussion of 29 July 2002 between Brian McMurdo of your office and Rod Peake of this City wherein a 24 hour extension to the 5.00pm Monday 29 July 2002 deadline given in the last paragraph of that letter was sought. Mr McMurdo advised that he would seek his client’s instructions on this matter.

I wish to provide the following response to the various matters dealt with in your letter:

1. This City does not dispute that your client has complied with, and is continuing to comply with, the provisions of the deed concerned, regarding construction of Joondalup Drive. It is however apparent to this City that the subdivision of your client’s land is being undertaken in such a manner that the deed provisions requiring construction of Joondalup Drive are not being ‘triggered’ in a manner which would facilitate the timely construction of this road. A recent application for clearance of subdivision which specifically excluded those lots abutting Joondalup Drive, and therefore meaning that the performance of the relevant deed obligation was not required, is an example of this.

Previous discussions with the Peet & Co. Project Manager for this project, Mr Russell Burnett, have led City officers to understand that the staging of the subdivision to result in such a non-triggering of the relevant deed obligations has been designed to achieve such a result.

The statement made in the Scheme Amendment Report regarding subdivision staging strategy (paragraph 4 on page 2) has been based upon this City’s observation of the pattern and timing of subdivision that has occurred to-date, and the understanding reached from Mr Burnett’s comments, as indicated above.

ATTACHMENT 3

PAGE 2 OF 3

The statement concerned in the Scheme Amendment Report was intended to set out the facts of the matter concerned, as this City understood them. However, this City is most concerned that your client has taken such umbrage to this statement. As the subject of this statement is not central to the rationale for this proposed Scheme Amendment, this City would be willing to consider deleting this paragraph from the Scheme Amendment Report at the earliest opportunity.

2. The City is of the view that the deed concerned does not fetter the City in the undertaking of amendments to DPS2 which it considers are necessary for the proper and orderly planning and development of this district. Amendment No. 9 is primarily intended to facilitate the timely provision of the Joondalup Drive link to the Banksia Grove residential area and beyond to connect with Neaves Road. It is considered that the timely provision of this road would not occur should the timing for construction be dependent upon the operation of the present deed.

This City consequently does not consider the undertaking of Amendment No. 9 to be in breach of the deed, nor does it agree with your assertion that it is ultra vires through not being a proper or valid exercise of the City’s powers. It sees the Amendment as being a suitable instrument for facilitating the timely provision of this important road link and consequently does not accede to your request for immediate steps to be taken to withdraw the Amendment.

In respect to your comment that “…; the attempt to extract from my client a payment for the total costs of construction of the extension of Joondalup Drive and other scheme costs is wholly unsupportable in terms of the powers and objects of making or amendment a planning scheme under the TPDA.”, this presumably relates to your earlier assertion that the Amendment is ultra vires. I am somewhat puzzled as to why you would be of this view as there have of course been many planning schemes made under the TPDA since the coming into effect of that Act which have involved provision of funds by developers to enable provision of infrastructure, including major roads, required for the land development concerned. In the case of this City, Parts 10 and 11 of DPS2 do this.

Notwithstanding the above advice regarding non-withdrawal of this Amendment, I wish to advise that your letter shall be presented to Council as a submission on the proposed Amendment and Council shall therefore be able to consider your advice in determining its position on the proposed Amendment.

It should also be noted that procedurally, Amendment No. 9 is being prepared pursuant to the Town Planning Regulations, 1967 (as amended) and these do not enable the City to consider withdrawal of the Amendment at this point but rather require Council to consider submissions received following conclusion of the submission period.

ATTACHMENT 3

PAGE 3 OF 3

Amendment No. 9 has of course received the consent of the Western Australian Planning Commission to be advertised for submissions. You may also wish to take the issue of whether this amendment is ultra vires or not up with the Commission.

3. In the fifth paragraph of your letter, you have advised that “The implications of the Scheme amendment report are that the contribution sought to be imposed could amount to as much as $750,000, but may ultimately be much higher than that”. The report actually refers to an estimated cost of Cell Works (as at 1 May 2002) of approximately $4,180,000.

Please contact Roman Zagwocki of this City on 9405 5433 should you have any queries on this matter.

Yours faithfully

ROMAN ZAGWOCKI

DIRECTOR, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 4

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 6

PAGE 1 OF 4

ATTACHMENT 6

PAGE 2 OF 4

ATTACHMENT 6

PAGE 3 OF 4

ATTACHMENT 6

PAGE 4 OF 4

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 7

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 8

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

2. Adoption Of Amendment No 8 To District Planning Scheme No. 2: Pt Lot 962 Anchorage Drive, Mindarie

File Ref: TPS/0008VO1

File Name: BACloofA.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the public submissions and adoption of Amendment No.8 to District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2).

Applicant	Chappell and Lambert
Owner	Mindarie Keys Joint Venture
Location	Part Lot 962 Anchorage Drive, Mindarie
Site Area	1.2925 hectares
MRS Zoning	Urban
Existing DPS 2 Zoning	Commercial, Business & Civic and Cultural
Proposed DPS 2 Zoning	Residential

Background

Part Lot 962 forms part of the Mindarie North Neighbourhood Centre and is located at the corner of Anchorage Drive and Bellport Parade, Mindarie (refer Attachments 1 and 2).

The amendment proposes to rezone portion of Lot 962 from Commercial, Business and Civic & Cultural to Residential, to enable the site to be developed and/or subdivided for residential purposes.

Council, at its meeting on 18 December 2001, resolved to prepare and submit the amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for consent to advertise (item PD09-12/01). As part of the same item, Council also resolved to advertise a modification to the Mindarie Keys Agreed Structure Plan to complement the scheme amendment. Council considered the results of advertising the structure plan modification at its meeting on 19 March 2002 (item PD04-03/02) and resolved to adopt the modification and forward it to the WAPC for adoption and certification. The WAPC has since deferred consideration of the structure plan modification until the scheme amendment has been finalised.

Detail

The Environmental Protection Authority advised the City on 4 February 2002 that the scheme amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment, thereby allowing the amendment to be advertised. The WAPC granted its consent to advertise the amendment on 23 May 2002.

Consultation

A 42-day public advertising period was carried out between 4 June and 16 July 2002. Advertising was carried out by way of an onsite sign, an advert in the ‘Wanneroo Times’ and letters to adjacent landowners.

At the conclusion of the advertising period, seven submissions had been received, including six letters of opposition from the owners/operators of adjacent businesses and one letter of support from a nearby resident.

Comment

A summary of the issues raised in the objections, along with an associated response is included below.

Issue 1

Adjacent businesses have established in the centre on the basis of a comprehensive centre being developed at this location. Rezoning the land to Residential will negatively affect the viability of existing adjacent businesses.

Response

The overall centre has an area of approximately 2.7 hectares. The eastern end of the centre adjacent to Marmion Avenue has been developed to include a mixed business development, a Mobil service station/convenience store, a McDonalds take away food outlet, a Chicken Treat take away food outlet and a restaurant. The western end of the centre, which is subject to this amendment has an area of approximately 1.3 hectares and accounts for approximately half the centre area.

The portion of the centre which is subject to this amendment was originally planned to accommodate a shopping and medical centre, child care centre, church and community centre. The community site is however now excess to Council’s requirements, given the planned multipurpose community facility at Lot 211 Quinns Road, located approximately 1.2 kilometres to the west of the subject land (Council has accepted a cash payment in lieu of the community land at Lot 962 which can be put toward development of the alternative community site). The owners of Lot 962 have also struggled to attract significant interest for the commercial and business zoned land and have indicated that efforts to develop the land have been further compromised by the ongoing development of the nearby Clarkson District Centre. Council may be aware of other neighbourhood centres in the adjacent suburbs of Clarkson and Merriwa which are experiencing problems in attracting tenants in developed centres.

The catchment for this centre is already predominantly developed and therefore additional demand for commercial and business premises in this area is unlikely to increase significantly in the future. Furthermore, the City’s DPS2 already provides discretion for Council to approve residential development in the Commercial and Business zones and approximately 25% of the undeveloped portion of the centre is already zoned Residential.

Issue 2

The landowners should sell the land on the open market to enable others to purchase and develop the land in accordance with the current zoning.

Response

The landowners have a right to seek alternative development options on the land to suit market demands. Council is not in a position to force the landowner to sell or develop their land in a particular way, especially in the case where there are concerns over the viability of the use.

The landowners have advised the City of the difficulty in gaining commercial interest in the land and as such have pursued an alternative zoning. It is not considered desirable that the land remains vacant (in either a developed or undeveloped state) in the long term, as this would serve no benefit to the amenity of the area or to the viability of the existing centre.

Issue 3

Residents in Mulgrave Loop and surrounding streets bought and built their homes with the full knowledge and understanding that Lot 962 would be developed in accordance with the Scheme and Local Structure Plan. As such, submissions from surrounding residents should not be given any weight by Council.

Response

This is a matter for the Council to determine.

Issue 4

Existing adjoining takeaway food and restaurant developments may potentially generate complaints in respect to lights, noise and late night trading.

Response

This point is a valid concern and careful consideration will need to be given to development of the land to ensure any amenity impacts from these uses are minimised. There are however many examples both within the City of Wanneroo and throughout the Metropolitan area where such a mix of land uses does exist.

Summary

The applicant has indicated difficulty in finding commercial interest in the subject land. Consequently, it is appropriate that Council consider alternative land-use options for this site.

On the basis of the above, it is recommended that the objections be dismissed and Council adopt the amendment.

Statutory Compliance

The amendment process has complied with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations.

Strategic Implications

Consideration of this amendment is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan. One of the strategies that arise from this goal is to provide for a cohesive system of integrated land use planning and to update and review planning.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17(2) ADOPTS, without modification, Amendment No 8 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 to:

a) Rezone Part Lot 962 Anchorage Drive, Mindarie from Commercial, Business and Civic and Cultural Zones to Residential Zone, and

b) Amend Schedule 3 to delete reference to the Mindarie Centre located on Part Lot 962.

2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25.(1)(g) AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the amendment documentation.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

SUBJECT SITE

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

3. Adoption of Estimated Cell Costs for East Wanneroo Cell 4 (Hocking - Pearsall).

File Ref: SP/0005V01

File Name: BAAdoOfD.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 14 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by T Neale Date 07 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of objections lodged against the estimated cell costs for East Wanneroo Cell 4.

Background

Council, at its meting held on 9 April 2002 (item PD04-04/02) adopted the estimated cell costs for East Wanneroo Cell 4. These costs are apportioned to the owners of land within the cell and provide for the equitable acquisition of land for public open space and regional roads and for the construction of the regional roads. The adopted cell costs were $20,559,530, which equates to an infrastructure cost per lot (ICPL) of $5,526.31.

Detail

District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) requires Council to notify all landowners within the cell of the estimated cell costs and to provide them with a 42 day period in which to lodge any objections. An objection must be accompanied by supporting evidence from a suitably qualified person to substantiate the objection.

Consultation

The City provided written advice of the adopted cell costs to all the participating landowners in the cell who have undertaken subdivision or development and published notification in the “West Australian” on two occasions.

The 42 day comment period concluded on 25 June 2002. At this time two letters of objection had been received from planning consultants acting on behalf of landowners in East Road and Archer Street.

The objections do not contest the quantum of the total estimated cell costs, rather the estimated lot yield (ELY) of 9 lots per hectare upon which the ICPL is calculated.

The basis of each letter of objection is summarised below:

Objection 1

The first objection on behalf on an owner of a property in East Road, states that the ELY of 9 lots per hectare used in the calculation of the ICPL is too low and should be increased. The objector has however not suggested an alternative lot yield, but rather suggested that that a review of the ELY be carried out by the City.

As indicated above, DPS2 requires that any objection to the cell costs be supported by evidence from a suitably qualified person to substantiate the objection. In this case no supporting evidence has been provided and therefore the objection should be dismissed.

Objection 2

The second objection on behalf of an owner of a property in Archer Street also objects to the ELY that is used in the calculation of the ICPL, stating that it should be adjusted upwards to match the lot yields that are being achieved in subdivisions in the cell. The objector states that the correct lot yield of its clients landholding, as demonstrated by their concept plan, is 11.32 lots per hectare and suggests that an overall lot yield of at least 10.5 lots per hectare should be used throughout the Cell. Again, no supporting evidence has been provided to substantiate increasing the ELY across the overall cell and on this basis the objection should be dismissed.

This letter of objection also raises the issue of compensation that was paid by the City to the landowner for an area of public open space, and in particular, the lot yield that was used by the City in determining the value of the land and the treatment of a further lot as a temporary drainage site.

Comment

The lot yield of nine (9) lots per hectare used by the City was originally calculated by analysing recent subdivisions in the area. This figure was also adopted by the then Department of Planning and Urban Development (now Department for Planning and Infrastructure) in its North West Corridor Structure Plan (1992) as the basis of calculating estimates of lot yield and population for new urban areas. The lot yield of 9 lots per hectare has now been incorporated into DPS2 as the lot yield to be initially used for the purpose of apportioning cell costs.

An analysis of the subdivisions within Cell 4 that have been completed to date does indicate that some lot yields of approximately 11 lots per hectare have been achieved. Administration has however carried out an assessment of likely lot yields across the remaining (undeveloped) portion of Cell 4 based on the adopted version of the structure plan, the average lot area calculated from the existing residential lots in the cell (627 m2) and allowing for areas of open space, special residential lots and non residential land uses. This assessment has indicated a lot yield of approximately 9.5 lots per hectare.

Given the likelihood that the more constrained areas of the cell are yet to be subdivided and the uncertainty surrounding future trends in lot sizes, a conservative approach should be adopted by Council. Council should note that DPS2 contains a provision to enable an adjustment of infrastructure contributions through ongoing review of current costs and provides for reimbursement of any surplus contributions to the original contributing landowners. There is however no ability for the City to recoup any shortfall in cell costs should it incorrectly estimate any component of the cell costs, including the ELY. Given these factors, it is recommended that the ELY of 9 lots per hectare be retained at this stage.

The matter of compensation paid for the public open space and the City’s treatment of the temporary drainage site has been considered by Council on two previous occasions (W297-10/00 and W51-02/01) and is not relevant to Council’s consideration of estimated cell costs.

Statutory Compliance

Clause 10.11 of DPS2 provides that if an objection is not agreed by Council, then it is to be referred to arbitration by a single arbitrator in the manner provided by the Commercial Arbitration Act. The arbitrator is to be bound by the provisions of Part 10 and Schedule 9 of DPS2 and the assumptions included in the Agreed Structure Plan for the cell.

In this case, as full supporting evidence to the objection has not been provided, the City is not required to refer the matter to arbitration. It would, however, be appropriate for the City to advise the objectors of its position and advise them that they may chose to refer the matter to arbitration.

Clause 10.11.1, which deals with the review of the cell costs provides that at the time Council reviews the cell costs it shall review the ELY and the ICPL having regard for the lots produced in the cell since the last review, the remaining cell works, any amendments made to the structure plan and any other factors Council considers relevant. This provides an ability for Council to monitor the situation in the future.

Strategic Implications

The determination of the cell costs, as well as the estimated lot yields and infrastructure costs per lot will provide for the provision of open space and regional roads to service East Wanneroo Cell 4. This is in accordance with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

An increase in the ELY used in the apportionment of the total estimated cell costs across the overall cell would cause a reduction in the ICPL that is payable by the subdividing land owners. If the ELY is increased from 9 to 10.5 lots per hectare as suggested by the objector, then the ICPL would decrease from $5,526.31 to $4,741.63.

Because of the difficulty in accurately determining the final lot yield for the overall cell at this early stage, increasing the ELY will place a greater risk on Council of not accumulating sufficient funds to fully meet the outstanding cell works and there is no practical or legal mechanism whereby Council can retrospectively collect any shortfall from the contributing landowners (other than where a contribution has been inadvertently not paid). Should a shortfall eventuate, then Council would need to decide whether to make up any shortfall from its municipal funds or simply not complete the cell works.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. DOES NOT AGREE to the objections raised to the adopted estimated cell costs and estimated cost per lot.

2. ADVISES the objectors that they may chose to refer the matter to arbitration in accordance with the principles of Clause 10.11 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

4. Adoption of Amendment to East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (Madeley and Darch): Pt Lot 2 Wanneroo Road, Madeley

File Ref: SP/0007/01V01

File Name: BACloof6.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the public submissions and adoption of an amendment to East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan.

Applicant	Drescher and Associates
Owner	Carnarvon Tourist Centre Pty Ltd
Location	Part Lot 2 Wanneroo Road, Madeley
Site Area	2.0822 hectares
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development

Background

Council, at its meeting of 11 June 2002, resolved to advertise an amendment to the Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (PD02-06/02). The amendment proposal seeks to amend the structure plan by altering the road design for Pt Lot 2 Wanneroo Road to accommodate a grouped housing site of 9082 square metres and by recoding the majority of the site from R20 to R40. A copy of the existing structure plan design for Pt Lot 2 and the proposed amended design is shown on Attachment 1.

Detail

Pt Lot 2 is 2.0822 hectares in area and is located approximately 200 metres north of the intersection of Kingsway and Wanneroo Road (refer Attachment 2). The site currently contains the Lush-Gro Nursery and is situated between two developing residential estates to the north (Patanal Pty Ltd) and south (Australand Pty Ltd).

A concept plan depicting how the group housing site could be developed has also been submitted by the proponent (refer Attachment 3). This plan is only an indicative design and does not contain sufficient information to enable a proper assessment to be undertaken. The plan should therefore not be afforded any formal status.

Consultation

A 28-day public advertising period was carried out between 25 June and 23 July 2002. The advertising was undertaken by way of onsite advertising signs, notice in the ‘Wanneroo Times’ newspaper and letters to adjacent landowners.

At the conclusion of the public advertising period a total of sixteen submissions had been received, including twelve letters of support and four letters of objection.

Two letters of support originated from the Managers of the Lush-Gro Nursery, three from local businesses at the Kingsway Shopping Centre and the remaining from residents in the adjoining residential estates. Two letters of objection were from the adjoining developers and two from owners or prospective owners of land within the adjoining residential estate.

Comment

The reasons raised in the submissions for supporting this proposal can be summarised as follows:

· The proposal will bring additional people into the area, benefiting local businesses.

· The proposal will reduce any land use conflicts between the nursery and adjacent residential lots.

· The addition of more medium density housing will enhance the area and provide increased housing diversity.

A summary of the issues raised in the letters of objection are as follows, along with an associated response.

Issue 1

The proposal amounts to an after-thought, which goes against the careful and consultative process that was followed when developing the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan.

Response

It is common for developing urban areas to undergo changes in planning as they develop. The structure plan process is comprehensive and includes the opportunity for widespread consultation. It is considered inappropriate to suggest that a structure plan should not be modified to respond to changing circumstances as an area develops.

Issue 2

The proposal will destroy the permeable road system that is promoted by the local structure plan.

Response

Whilst the overall road design will not be substantially compromised and pedestrian and vehicular links are generally maintained, the redesign does represent a less permeable road configuration. Council considered the matter of permeability when initially considering this structure plan amendment and proceeded to advertise the proposal.

Issue 3

Council officers were not prepared to consider minor amendments to the local structure plan sought by Australand when lodging for approval of the abutting subdivision (Madeley Grove).

Comment

All amendments to structure plans are considered on their merits. Numerous design changes have been undertaken to the Cell 6 local structure plan, both through the subdivision process and, where necessary, the formal amendment process.

Issue 4

Lots in Madeley Grove (Australand’s residential estate) have been bought on the basis that the application will be subdivided and developed for single residential purposes.

Comment

The Madeley Grove estate (to the south of Pt Lot 2) has not been subdivided adjacent to the boundary of the subject land to date. The proposal has been widely advertised. Only one letter of objection was received from a landowner within the Madeley Grove estate.

Issue 5

A grouped housing site has already been incorporated into Patanal’s Parkmore Ridge development (to the north) and this meets the City of Wanneroo’s philosophy for density sites in East Wanneroo.

Response

Medium density sites within Cell 6 have generally been located adjacent to neighbourhood amenities, such as shopping centre sites and open space, or along public transport routes. This site generally meets these criteria. To date few medium density areas have been subdivided or developed to their full potential and this site will assist in providing greater housing choice in the area.

Issue 6

The proposal severely impacts on those lots within Parkmore Ridge (estate to the north) that will back on to the R40 site.

Comment

Only four residential lots from the Parkmore Ridge estate back onto the proposed R40 site. The R40 site will be required to be developed in accordance with the design requirements of the Residential Planning Codes, which provide for reasonable levels of residential amenity. Under these circumstances it is difficult to argue that the Parkmore Ridge lots will be severely impaired by the R40 density coding.

Issue 7

The proposed medium density site is poorly shaped and has a poor relationship with adjoining land holdings.

Response

Council considered the matter of the configuration of the R40 site when initially considering the structure plan amendment. Whilst the shape of the R40 site is unusual the design concept prepared for the site, as shown in Attachment 3, demonstrates that the site is capable of being developed in a form where the development orientates and integrates with adjoining streets and open space.

Issue 8

Under the proposal, the continuation of Bryanston Pass is deleted, which is unfair for the abutting developer.

Response

Council considered the matter of terminating this street when initially considering the structure plan amendment and proceeded to advertise the proposal. The applicant’s concept plan indicates that a major entrance to the site can be provided from this street.

Issue 9

Financial reasons are not a legitimate planning reason to allow the proposal to proceed.

Response

Administration has been advised that an independent developer has agreed to purchase Pt Lot 2 from the applicant conditional upon this amendment being finalised. The negotiations for the sale of the property will enable the landowner to relocate the existing nursery to a more appropriate location. The relocation of the nursery use will prevent potential land use conflicts between the nursery and the developing residential area of Madeley. Whilst Council in progressing the amendment to the structure plan considered a full range of planning issues, it also recognised the amenity benefits to the area in relocating the nursery and the financial needs of the applicant to achieve this.

Issue 10

The recoding will increase vehicle traffic and increase the overall population density in the area.

Comment

If the R40 site is developed to its full potential, there is likely to be a marginal increase in the number of dwellings, population and traffic volumes in the area. However it is not considered that a significant increase in traffic volumes will result and the surrounding road network will still operate well within its capacity.

Issue 11

A higher density residential development may attract transient dwellers, which bring associated social problems.

Response

The City does not control housing tenure. Although the R40 site will provide the potential for a greater range in housing choice within this area, which is likely to provide for a more diverse community, administration is not aware of any evidence which directly links medium density housing to social problems.

Statutory Compliance

This amendment to the local structure plan has complied with the procedures outlined in District Planning Scheme No.2. On the basis of the above comments, it is recommended that the objections be dismissed and Council adopt the amendment to the local structure plan.

Strategic Implications

Consideration of this structure plan amendment is consistent with Goal 2 of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and the provision of quality services and infrastructure.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 RESOLVES that the Amendment to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan, as set out in Attachment 1 of this report, is satisfactory and SUBMITS three copies to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification.

2. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 ADOPTS, SIGNS AND SEALS the amended structure plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Sub-Division Applications

5. Lot 506 Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda - Proposed Rural Subdivision

File Ref: SD119701V01

File Name: CAParLot.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 14 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by tpd Date 09 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of a proposed rural subdivision of Lot 506 Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda, into two lots of 4.2 and 5.8 hectares respectively.

Applicant	B J Philp
Owner	B J Philp
Location	Lot 506 Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda
Site Area	10.0200 hectares
DPS 2 Zoning	Rural Resource
MRS Zoning	Rural

Background

The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) has referred the subject application to the City for its comments. The subject land is situated on Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda immediately south of the State Forest (refer Attachment 1). The proposal is to subdivide the subject land into two lots of 4.2 and 5.8 hectares respectively (refer Attachment 2).

Lot 506 was created in 1996 by the current landowners from the subdivision of Lot 500. This subdivision was approved on appeal by the Minister for Planning on compassionate grounds. In upholding the appeal the Minister made it clear the approval should not be viewed as a general precedent for subdivision of land in this locality.

In 1996, the City also issued approval for a second dwelling on Lot 506. Pursuant to Council’s policy at that time, the approval was conditional upon the owners entering into a legal agreement with the City, aimed at preventing the landowners from seeking further subdivision of the land. The second dwelling was subsequently constructed.

Notwithstanding the legal agreement, in 1999 a further application for the subdivision of Lot 506 was made. This application was not supported by the City and was ultimately refused by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC). The applicant again lodged an appeal to the Minister for Planning on the basis that undersized lots already existing in the locality. The Minister however dismissed the appeal stating that the previous appeal, relating to the parent Lot 500, was upheld on compassionate grounds and that that decision should not be viewed as a general precedent for subdivision in the locality.

Detail

The subject lot contains two dwellings. If the subdivision application were successful, then each lot would contain a dwelling. The central portion of the lot contains a turf farm of approximately 3 hectares in area. The applicant intends to subdivide the land in order to provide a separate lot to his son.

Consultation

Under the provisions of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928, as a referral agency, the City is required to make its comments to the WAPC within a 42 day period. The Act does not make provision for community consultation on subdivision applications.

Comment

The following matters are noted in regard to this application.

Lot Sizes

Under the City’s current Rural Subdivision Policy, this lot falls within an area where subdivision below 20 hectares should not generally be supported because it would tend to undermine the rural resource objectives of District Planning Scheme No.2. These objectives seek to promote agricultural, horticultural, animal husbandry and resource extraction and seek to preclude uses or fragmentation of land that may be incompatible with these uses. The policy however provides that in special cases, where it can be demonstrated that the subdivision would be consistent with the objectives of the rural resource zone, the minimum lot size may be reduced to 8.0 hectares. The proposed lot sizes are well below this minimum.

Except for Part Lot 500, from which the subject Lot 506 was created and which has an area of 10.3 hectares, the lots within a radius of 1.0 km of the subject land are at least 19 hectares in area.

Water Allocation

The applicant currently has a water licence for 25,000 kilolitres per annum to irrigate the existing turf farm. Ground water in this area has been fully allocated. Additional water could only be obtained for this lot through water trading.

Soil Category

Under the “Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta” study undertaken in 1997 by a number of government agencies, the subject lot is included in an area rated as ‘high capability land for horticulture (Class 1 & 2 for market gardens, orchards and vines)’. Thus, purely from a soil capability perspective, the subject lot has a potential to be used for intensive agricultural activities.

Legal Agreement

The current landowners have entered into a legal agreement with the City specifically agreeing that they will not seek subdivision of the land unless the land is rezoned in a manner intended to permit subdivision or unless Council resolves to amend its policy to allow subdivision. Neither a rezoning or policy change has occurred in this case.

The purpose of the legal agreement was to prevent the existence of the second dwelling from being used as a reason for subdivision. Whilst the applicant has not specifically stated that the reason for subdivision is due to the existence of two dwellings, the proposed subdivision design provides for a new lot each of which does contain a dwelling.

The legal agreement is supported by an absolute caveat which will prevent any dealings, such as land subdivision, from being undertaken and contains a clause enabling the City to bring injunctive proceedings against the landowners if a subdivision application is made.

Summary

The application proposes lot sizes well below the minimum stipulated in the City’s Rural Subdivision policy. The soil type present in this case appears to be suitable for agricultural purposes and a ground water allocation exists for portion of the land, with the potential for additional water through trading. The lot was created from the previous subdivision of an adjoining lot and is already around half the size of the prevailing lots size in the immediate vicinity. The landowners have not provided any planning justification for the proposal and in fact have specifically agreed with the City that they will not seek to subdivide the land. A previous similar application has also been refused. Under these circumstances it is recommended that Council does not support this application.

Statutory Compliance

Under Section 24(2) of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928, the City is required to forward its comments to WAPC within 42 days of receiving the referral. The application was received on 31 July 2002 and it is therefore considered that Council will be able to make a determination on this application within the 42-day comment period.

The current legal agreement contains a clause enabling the City to bring injunctive proceedings against the landowners if a subdivision application is made. The absolute caveat however provides a sufficient legal mechanism for Council to prevent the land from being subdivided, even if the application is ultimately approved by the WAPC or an appeal is upheld. It is therefore not recommended that Council initiate proceedings in this case.

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council does NOT support the application by B J Philp for the proposed subdivision of Lot 506 Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda, as depicted on the plan dated 18 July 2002 (WAPC 119701) for the following reasons:

1. The application is inconsistent with Council’s Rural Subdivision Policy, which specifies a minimum lot size of 20.0 hectares, or where special circumstances can be demonstrated, no less than 8.0 hectares;

2. The introduction of smaller lots is inconsistent with the objectives of the Rural Resource Zone under the District Planning Scheme Number 2;

3. The landowner has entered into a legal agreement with the City, which is supported by an absolute caveat, whereby the landowners have agreed that they will not seek subdivision of this land.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

6. Proposed Rural Subdivision - Lot 11 Safari Place and Lot 24 Emerald Drive, Carabooda

File Ref: SD119635V01

File Name: CA24&11x.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by tpd Date 13 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Consideration of a rural subdivision application which proposes to adjust the common boundary between Lot 11 Safari Place and 24 Emerald Drive, Carabooda.

Applicant	Mitchell Goff & Associates
Owner	Mr T M Riseborough and Linpark Holding Pty Ltd
Location	Lot 11 Safari Place and Lot 24 Emerald Drive, Carabooda
Site Area	20.32 ha and 4.02 ha (total 24.3482 ha)
DPS 2 Zoning	Rural Resource and Special Rural
MRS Zoning	Rural

Background

The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) has referred the application to the City for its comments. The application area includes both Lot 11 Safari Place and Lot 24 Emerald Drive and proposes to adjust the common boundary between these lots to decrease Lot 11 from 20.32 hectares (ha) to 18.00 ha and increase Lot 24 from 4.02 ha to 6.33 ha. The location of the subject land is shown on Attachment 1 and a plan outlining the proposal is shown on Attachment 2.

Detail

The applicant has submitted the proposal for practical agricultural reasons. The north western corner of Lot 11 contains a vineyard, a house and other improvements in an area of approximately 2.32 ha. A market garden exists and is proposed to be expanded over the remaining portion of Lot 11. To separate the vineyard from the balance of Lot 11, the owner proposes to purchase Lot 24 Emerald Drive to provide space to extend the vineyard.

Consultation

Under the provisions of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928, as a referral agency, the City is required to make its comments to the WAPC within 42 days of receiving the referral. The Act does not make provision for public consultation on subdivision applications.

Comment

Lot 11 is zoned Rural Resource and Lot 24 is zoned Special Rural. Under the special provisions of this Special Rural zone, land use permissibility for Lot 24 shall be determined in accordance with Rural Resource zone. Therefore amalgamating a portion of Lot 11 with Lot 24 to create a dual-zoned lot would not be problematic from a land use point of view.

Although it would be preferable for each lot to have a single zoning, neither the boundary adjustment nor the proposed agricultural use of the land require the zoning of the land to be changed. It is therefore not considered reasonable to make the application conditional upon the zoning being rationalised. It is however recommended that the applicant be advised that the City will seek to rationalise the zonings to accord to the new lot boundaries in the future. In this regard, the City will be considering initiating an amendment to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) in the future to implement a number of zoning changes following the adoption of the Local Rural Strategy and that this amendment may readily include the subject zone rationalisation. This exercise will also require the modification to the Development Guide Plan (DGP) for the Special Rural Zone to accommodate the additional land and to specify that this lot should not be further subdivided. In this regard, it is noted that Special Provision 1 relating to this zone requires that a modified DGP be prepared and approved by Council and the WAPC to bring that plan into line with the actual subdivision boundaries for the broader Special Rural zone.

Statutory Compliance

Under Section 24(2) of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928, the City is required to forward its comments to WAPC within 42 days of receiving the referral. The application was received on 23 July 2002. Administration has requested the WAPC defer the application to provide an opportunity for Council to consider the matter.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Lot 11 Safari Place is currently zoned Rural Resource and is therefore subject to Council Rural Subdivision policy. Under the provisions of the policy, Council shall only support subdivision of Rural Resource zoned land, where each lot yielded by the proposed subdivision contains a minimum area of 20 ha, except in special cases where it can be shown to Council’s satisfaction that a lot not less than 8ha would not undermine the objectives of Rural Resource Zone. The current proposal would create a Rural Resource lot of 18.0 ha.

The objectives of Rural Resource zone are to protect intensive agriculture, horticultural and animal husbandry areas as well as key resource extraction areas from incompatible use or subdivision. In this case, the proposal does not seek to create additional lots, but rather adjust the common boundary between two existing lots to assist in the practical operation of the land. Whilst the proposal would create a lot that is smaller than the specified 20 ha minimum, there are a number of examples of smaller lots in close proximity, which are considerably less than the proposed 18.00 ha. On the basis of these factors it is not considered that the proposal would undermine the objectives of the Rural Resource zone and the proposal could be considered as a special case that warrants Council’s support.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission that it SUPPORTS the application by Mitchell Goff & Associates on behalf of Mr T M Riseborough and Linpark Holdings Pty Ltd for the adjustment to the common boundary of Lot 11 Safari Place and Lot 24 Emerald Drive, Carabooda, as depicted on the plan dated 1 July 2002 subject to:

1. All buildings and effluent disposal systems having the necessary clearance from the new lot boundaries as required by the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2; and

2. The applicant being advised that since the resultant Lot 24 Emerald Drive would straddle the existing zone boundaries, that the City will seek to amend it’s District Planning Scheme No.2 to zone the entire new lot Special Rural and modify the Development Guide Plan for the Special Rural Zone No.18 to accommodate the additional land and specify that the lot should not be further subdivided.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

7. Request for Consent to Submit a Subdivision Application: Lot 3 Gibbs Road, Nowergup

File Ref: P24/0004

File Name: CAAppfor.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 13 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 13 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 5

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider a request seeking the City’s consent, pursuant to a legal agreement, to submit a subdivision application for Lot 3 Gibbs Road, Nowergup, and also seeking support for that subdivision proposal.

Applicant	C & K Brown
Owner	C & K Brown
Location	Lot 3 Gibbs Road, Nowergup
Site Area	5.6788 ha
DPS 2 Zoning	Rural Resource
MRS	Rural

Background

The location of Lot 3 Gibbs Road is shown in Attachment 1.

A more detailed location plan which includes the sizes of lots in the vicinity of Lot 3 Gibbs Road is shown in Attachment 2.

In 1991, the City issued approval for the construction of a second house on the subject land. This was a ‘transportable’ home located near the Gibbs Road frontage of the lot. Pursuant to Council’s policy at the time, this approval was conditional upon the owner entering into a legal agreement with the City aimed at preventing the owner from subsequently using the presence of the second house as a reason for seeking subdivision of the lot.

The relevant clause in the agreement states:

“(ii) That until such time as the land is rezoned from its present rural zoning under the Town Planning Scheme presently applicable thereto to some other zoning whereby the land may be subdivided the Owner will not without the prior written consent of the Council seek to subdivide the land or apply for approval to any subdivision thereof”.

In October 1996, the City issued approval for a cattery to be developed on the subject land. The cattery was the subject of additions in 1996 and currently operates as ‘Katie’s Kattery’.

In July 1999, approval was granted for the development of an aquaculture/tourist facility on the lot. The facility currently operates as ‘Crystal Springs Recreational Fishing’.

The location of the current uses on the lot referred to above is shown on Attachment 3.

Detail

The owners of Lot 3 Gibbs Road have submitted a request seeking Council’s consent, pursuant to the legal agreement referred to above, to make an application to subdivide their lot. They also seek Council’s support to the subdivision proposal.

The subdivision proposal essentially involves the creation of a new lot of 4 688 m² upon which the existing cattery is located, to enable the owners to sell the cattery business.

The proposed subdivision is shown on Attachment 3 and 4. The reasons and arguments submitted by the owner in support of the proposal are summarised in the comment section of this report and are set out in more detail in Attachment 5. The owner’s submission which includes the further information as referred to in Attachment 5 has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room for information.

Consultation

The Western Australian Planning Commission will consult with relevant government agencies in assessing the subdivision application once formally submitted. The Town Planning and Development Act does not contain provision for community consultation for subdivision proposals and given the nature of this request and the developed nature of Lot 3, further consultation is not considered necessary.

Comment

The landowner is seeking Council consideration of two things:

1. Consent, pursuant to the legal agreement, regarding the lodging of a subdivision application; and

2. Support for that subdivision application.

These points do not necessarily amount to the same thing and there are different issues to be considered in each case. The following possibilities exist:

· Consent to the lodging of the application and support the application;

· Consent to the lodging of the application but not support the application;

· Not consent to the lodging of the application and not support the application.

(It would not be logical to support the application but not consent to the lodging of the application).

Request for Consent to Lodge the Subdivision Application

The present legal agreement prevents (without Council approval) the landowner from lodging a subdivision application with the WA Planning Commission. The intention of this is to prevent the existence of a second house on the lot from being used as a basis for seeking of such subdivision. This assumes that subdivision would be sought to enable each house to be on its own lot.

In this case however, the purpose of the subdivision is not related to the existence of a second house and both houses will remain on the same balance-of-title lot. In this circumstance, it is not considered reasonable to withhold consent for lodging of a subdivision application.

Request for Support for Proposed Subdivision

The landowner’s letter (included in Attachment 5) provides their reasons and arguments in support of the subdivision application. The following comments summarises and assesses those reasons and arguments:

Reason 1

The applicant believes that as the proposed lot is to accommodate an existing activity that does not require any further land, such subdivision is not fettered by Council’s current Rural Subdivision policy.

Comment

Lot 3 Gibbs Road is situated within a part of the rural area whereby the following elements of Council’s Rural Subdivision policy are applicable:

a) A minimum lot size of 20ha should be maintained, however a smaller lot size (to a minimum of 8 ha) may be supported if it can be demonstrated that such a smaller lot size will not be contrary to the objectives of the Rural Resource zone. (The applicant has referred to a possible concession in the policy involving a housing density of maximum 1 per 2 hectares, however this is incorrect).

b) Gibbs Road is designated as a ‘scenic drive’. Subdivision proposals for land near to such roads are to receive special consideration and the basic aim shall be to protect and enhance the rural landscape character of land which is readily visible from these roads.

c) The lot falls within a ‘limestone resource area’. Subdivision in these areas shall not be supported if it is considered likely to lead to the unavailability of the resource for extraction.

d) The lot falls within Special Planning Policy Area No. 3 (Caves and Karstic Areas) of the Interim Local Rural Strategy (LRS). In the parts of this area where caves are considered a high probability, subdivision applications must be supported by appropriate caves/karstic feature surveys and studies.

Council’s Rural Subdivision policy does apply to this land notwithstanding that the purpose of the subdivision is to fragment the land containing an existing land use. Whilst Council is not bound by its policy, it must have regard to the objectives and provisions of the policy in arriving at its decision.

Council has also adopted a ‘special cases approach’ in considering rural subdivision applications, whereby if Council considers the particular circumstances applying to any case warrant support of a proposed lot size below the minimum size specified in the policy, then it may provide such support.

Reason 2

The applicant considers that despite the Rural Resource zoning of the land, and its designation as a limestone resource area under both the rural subdivision policy and the Western Australian Planning Commission’s Statement of Planning Policy on Basic Raw Materials, mining of limestone on or near to this lot is unlikely to occur or be approved, and therefore should not constrain this subdivision proposal.

Comment

This view is supported.

Reason 3

The applicant considers that intensive agricultural use of the lot is unlikely due to presence of limestone, and that such use would be detrimental to the retention of existing bushland which contributes to the landscape value of the area. Agricultural issues should therefore not constrain this proposal.

Comment

This view is supported.

Reason 4

The applicant considers that the landscape value of this area, particularly in respect to views available from Gibbs Road, would not be affected by the proposal.

Comment

As the proposed new lot has already been substantially developed, it is agreed that subdivision would not impact on the landscape value of the area.

Reason 5

The applicant considers that the caves and karstic linear lake chain in this vicinity would be best put to uses which enabled protection of the landscape values and caves/karstic/ features present, rather than intensive agricultural or mining uses, and that this subdivision proposal is consistent with this approach.

Comment

It is agreed that protection of the landscape values and caves/karstic features involved should be promoted and this is consistent with the Interim LRS. In respect to the issue of caves/karst surveys referred to in 1 (d) above, this is not considered necessary in this case as the development already exists on the subject land.

Reason 6

The applicant considers precedents exist in the rural area where relatively small lots exist to accommodate non-rural uses which do not require much land for their operation eg. the service stations on Wanneroo Road in Neerabup.

Comment

A limited number of small lots have been created in the rural area of Wanneroo to contain specific land uses. These small lots do provide useful parallels for identifying the relevant issues.

Reason 7

The applicant refers to the popular service the existing cattery provides to the community, and the local employment opportunities it also provides. (The inference is that the facility and resultant employment would be lost if the cattery was to cease operation due to an inability to be able to be sold to a new operator).

Comment

Market considerations are not a valid planning argument to support subdivision. Notwithstanding this, there are presently 5 catteries in Wanneroo. The loss of this cattery may mean a temporary reduction in the level of cattery services in the Wanneroo area. In time however the market would ordinarily respond by establishing additional or expanded facilities elsewhere to meet any unsatisfied demand for cattery services.

Reason 8

The applicant has advised of personal reasons (recreational/retirement/superannuation related) for wishing to sell the cattery.

Comment

While such reasons are obviously important to the applicant, they are not a relevant planning consideration.

Reason 9

The applicant advises of an inability to lease the cattery, and therefore sees that selling it is the only way to dispose of it.

Comment

Again this is a market consideration which is not a valid planning argument for subdivision. In any case, the lease terms which are sought by the applicant would need to be known to be able to properly comment on the validity of this argument.

Other Issues Requiring Consideration

If this application is supported by Council and subsequently approved by the WAPC, it would be largely due to issues associated with the operation of the existing cattery on this site. However, it is possible that at some future time the then owner of the cattery may wish to cease operating the cattery and perhaps demolish it and put the lot to another use, perhaps simply as a house. This would be contrary to the intent of the subdivision and some mechanism would need to be put in place to cover this issue.

Also support for this application would establish a precedent for consideration of similar applications which may be made in the future. This could involve other catteries, kennels, or other non-rural uses where similar circumstances apply. Presently in Wanneroo (in its rural area), there are 2 catteries, 3 combination catteries/kennels, and 4 kennel establishments and a range of non rural related uses. It is therefore important that consideration of the application be based on an approach which can be similarly applied to other similar future cases which may arise.

Summary

Many of the reasons and arguments submitted by the applicant are considered valid. At a more general level, catteries and kennels involve provision of a type of service which urban communities require reasonably near to urban areas, and are generally best located within nearby rural areas. (Catteries are only able to be permitted under DPS2 in the General Rural, Rural Resource, Special Rural and Special Residential zones, and kennels are only able to be permitted in the General Rural and Rural Resource zones). However, they only require a relatively small area of land which in many cases is significantly less than the minimum lot size which is stipulated in the rural subdivision policy.

The issue to be considered is whether a reasonable case exists for such uses to be able to be accommodated on lot sizes which are related to the actual requirements of the use, and therefore whether these should be considered as ‘special cases’ in respect to the rural subdivision policy.

Due to the significant implications associated with such an approach and the likelihood that many other types of uses may well seek to present similar arguments for subdivision, it is considered that this is an issue best addressed through the project initiated by the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure which is now in progress and which involves a comprehensive review of the planning and policy framework applying to this City’s rural area, and is addressing both land use planning and water management issues.

The office of the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure has recently sought an Issues Paper from City Administration to assist the senior inter-departmental committee which is to oversee the review and this Issues Paper has included the issue presented by this type of application.

Statutory Compliance

Should a subdivision application be made to the WAPC, this will be referred to the City for comment and recommendations pursuant to the Town Planing and Development Act 1928.

Strategic Implications

The issue of fragmenting land to accommodate existing land uses is one that should be addressed by the senior inter-departmental committee established by the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure and subsequently addressed in the Local Rural Strategy.

Policy Implications

This application involves consideration of a possible further circumstance where a ‘special case’ approach could be considered in the implementation of the Rural Subdivision Policy.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. CONSENTS to Christopher John Brown and Katie Dee Brown applying for approval to subdivide Lot 3 Gibbs Road, Nowergup, as provided for under clause 1 (ii) of the Deed dated 5 March 1991 between Mr and Mrs Brown and this City, subject to that application (in terms of proposed lot boundaries) being generally the same as the subdivision proposal shown on Attachment No. 4 to this report, with such consent being given on the basis that the proposed subdivision does not entail a creating of separate lots for each existing house on the present lot and consequently the intent of the Deed is not relevant in this case.

2. ADVISES Mr and Mrs Brown that:

a) should a subdivision application based on the subdivision design shown on Attachment No. 4 to this report be made to the Western Australian Planning Commission and subsequently referred by the Commission to this City for comment, this City would not be prepared to consider supporting that application because it is considered to raise significant implications and potential precedents for the planning of the whole rural area and consequently the issues raised would be better first considered by the senior inter-departmental committee now being established by the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to review the planning and policy framework currently applying to land use and water management in this City’s rural area.

b) the City has accordingly referred the issues presented by the application which has been made to the senior inter-departmental committee for consideration.

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 1 OF 6

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 2 OF 6

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 3 OF 6

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 4 OF 6

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 5 OF 6

ATTACHMENT 5

PAGE 6 OF 6

Delegated Authority Reports

8. Development Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For July 2002

File Ref: S09/0009V01

File Name: FADevApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by hw Date 14 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by hw Date 14 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Development Applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.

Background

Nil

Detail

The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes (R Codes.)

The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures with between 80 to 130 development applications being received per month in addition to an average of 400 to 500 building license applications.

Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to Council Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.

Council Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.

Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Nil

Statutory Compliance

A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 14 August 2001 (item W340-08/01 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning & Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

9. Subdivision Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For The Month Of July 2002

File Ref: S09/0008

File Name: FCSubApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 14 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 14 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 10

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Determination of subdivision applications processed in the period between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002 under delegated authority.

Detail

The West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.

Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Division this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.

Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.

SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).

SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.

SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.

SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.

SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.

SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.

The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority between 1 July 2002 and 30 July 2002.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTE the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002 as listed:

WAPC No/Recd.

Location /Owner

Zoning / LDU Category

Advice

WAPC Advised

117967

24/12/2001

Lot 9002 (133B) Clarkson Ave, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development, Special Residential,

Reservation – Other Regional Road

SCU1

Supported

Note: Application originally deferred

6/02/ 02 pending consideration of LSP amendments.

11/07/2002

119115

14/06/2002

Lot 9004 (133D) Clarkson Ave, Tapping

Peet & Co Ltd ATF

Yatala Unit Trust

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

03/07/2002

119361

27/06/2002

Lot 64 (33) Russell Road, Madeley

A & R Cvitan

Urban Development

SCU6

Not Supported

Note: land affected by 500 metre poultry farm buffer

24/07/2002

119406

24/06/2002

Lot 120 (27) Chicquita Place, Wanneroo

T & T Gryglicka

Special Rural 02

SCU6

Not Supported

Note: contrary to DPS2 provisions

03/07/2002

119424

24/06/2002

Lot 81 (147) Nicholas Road, Hocking

Mining Plant & Rehabilitation Contractors (Qld) Pty Ltd

Urban Development

SCU1

Supported

17/07/2002

119538

11/07/2002

Lot 27 (87) Windsor Road, Wangara

P M Jenzen

Service Industrial

SCU1

Supported

18/07/2002

119582

25/07/2002

Lot 81 (3) Glenorchy Brace, Wanneroo

J & J Dvorak

Urban Development

SCU5

Supported

31/07/2002

119716

29/07/2002

Lot 437 (21) Wester Crescent, Quinns Rocks

J Pearce & M Westaway

Residential

SCU5

Supported

31/07/2002

632-02

17/06/2002

Lot 675 (32) Pointer Way, Girrawheen

Homeswest Rentals

Residential

SCU1

Supported

Note: strata

12/07/2002

10.

658-02

01/07/2002

Lot 21 (37) Warman Street, Neerabup

G Dawe & B Buckley

General Industrial

SCU1

Supported

Note: strata

10/07/2002

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Other Matters

10. Closure Of Thoroughfares To Vehicles: Evandale Road -Redcliffe Avenue, Marangaroo And Goldsworthy Entrance, Alexander Heights

File Ref: R19/0005V01

File Name: HACloofT.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 14 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by T Neale Date 07 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider making an order for the closure of certain thoroughfares to vehicles.

Background

At its meeting held on 2 July 2002, (item LR01-07/02), Council authorised public notification of its proposal to close Evandale Road-Redcliffe Avenue, Marangaroo and Goldsworthy Entrance, Alexander Heights to traffic for a period of four years

The closures are being implemented to allow the construction of sections of Hepburn Avenue and Mirrabooka Avenue. The closures will remain in place following the opening of these roads to traffic.

Detail

The location of the closures are shown on Attachment 1.

Redcliffe Avenue currently forms a through route with Evandale Road. It is planned to convert it to a cul-de-sac as part of the construction of Hepburn Avenue. The design concept is shown on Attachment 2.

Goldsworthy Entrance currently forms a continuous route with Berkley Road and is planned to be converted to a cul-de-sac as part of the construction of Mirrabooka Avenue. The design concept is shown on Attachment 3.

Both road modifications are intended to be permanent, however the Local Government Act restricts an order for closure to vehicles made by a local government to a period of no more than four years. The legislation does not however prevent the making of another order at the end of that period that continues the closure of the thoroughfare.

Consultation

Public notification of the proposals were published in the “Wanneroo Times Community” newspaper on 23 July 2002 and copies of the notice were made available for viewing at the new Civic Centre and at each of the City’s libraries. Notice of the closures were also served on each of the relevant public utilities.

A period of 35 days was allowed for the lodging of submissions and this period ended on 26 August 2002. At the time of writing this report, two submissions had been received. Council will be advised of any further submissions received during the advertising period.

An objection from the owners of the Alexander Heights Shopping Centre claims that the closure of Goldsworthy Entrance at Mirrabooka Avenue will significantly restrict access to the shopping centre. This objector considers that it is important to maintain access to Mirrabooka Avenue, via Goldsworthy Entrance, until Mirrabooka Avenue is extended north to the Landsdale Gardens residential estate.

A submission from a resident of Truscott Elbow, Alexander Heights which is some 400 metres east of Mirrabooka Avenue, states that the closure at Goldsworthy Entrance will force residents to travel in a different direction onto Mirrabooka Avenue to gain access to Hepburn Ave. This objector considers a roundabout at the current intersection to be a more effective traffic management measure.

Comment

The closure of Goldsworthy Entrance at Mirrabooka Avenue is provided for by the Berkley Road Local Structure Plan that was adopted in August 1992 and forms part of the ultimate planned road design for the locality. Local vehicle access to the shopping centre will continue to be available through the surrounding road network.

Hepburn Avenue is not constructed. Given that access onto it by residents in the locality will be via Mirrabooka Avenue, the local street network provides alternative connections onto Mirrabooka Avenue. A roundabout directly onto Mirrabooka Avenue at Goldsworthy Entrance is not considered to be appropriate.

As the closure complies with the structure plan for the area and sufficient alternative access is available through the local road system, both objections against closure should be dismissed.

Statutory Compliance

The requirements of the Local Government Act have been complied with in the processing of these closures.

Strategic Implications

These road closures are consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which provides for managing infrastructure to meet the needs of the community.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council MAKES an order for the closure of thoroughfares to vehicles for a period of four years, pursuant to Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995, for Redcliffe Avenue, Marangaroo at its junction with Hepburn Avenue and Goldsworthy Entrance, Alexander Heights at its junction with Mirrabooka Avenue.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

ATTACHMENT 2

Technical Services

Tenders

11. Extension Of Contract No W00146 - The Provision Of Green Waste Shredding Services At Motivation Drive, Wangara

File Ref: S34/0007Vol1

File Name: AAExtofC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachment: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a 12 month extension to the contract period for Contract No W00124 – the Provision of Green Waste Shredding Services at Motivation Drive, Wangara .

Background

The Wangara Greens Facility processes the green waste from the bulk rubbish collection and the weekend deliveries from ratepayers. The quantity is significantly in excess of what the City’s current shredder can process and the additional capacity is provided by contract.

Detail

The current contract is for a 2-year period from 1 September 2000 to 31 August 2002. The contract has provision for a 12-month extension as per the following clause:

Contract Period means this contract will commence from 1 September 2000 for a period of two years and shall expire on 31 August 2002. The Principal may consider extending the Contract Period for an additional one year to 31 August 2003 or a part thereof. If the Principal chooses to extend the Contract Period, such extension of this Contract shall be in writing in accordance with the same terms and condition of this Contract and shall be at the discretion of the principal.

The contractor has advised the City that it is willing to enter into an extension of the contract at a new rate of $8.35 per cubic metre. This rate is below the next lowest tendered price.

The original tender price was $7.95 per cubic metre and this has applied for two years. The proposed increase is 2.5% per annum, which is considered reasonable as it is below the increase in the CPI for Perth for the March Quarter 2002 of 3.2%.

Comment

The contractor, Soiland Garden Supplies Pty Ltd, produces a good quality mulch and has provided reasonable service. The price is considered competitive.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The City operates a joint greens drop off facility with the City of Joondalup and also processes greens from the bulk collection in both councils at the site. It also sells the mulch from the site to residents and to date has been able to sell all the mulch it has available. Last year total revenue from these activities was $400,404.

Last year Council spent $113,851 on mulching services and expenditure this year is likely to be of similar magnitude.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES a 12-month extension to Contract No W00146 - Provision of Green Waste Shredding Services,with Soiland Garden Supplies under the same terms and conditions as the current contract, with an amended rate of $8.35 per cubic metre.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

12. Extension Of Contract No’s W00129, W00130 And W00131

File Ref: S08/0002V01

File Name: AAExtOfT.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the 12 month extensions of the contract period for three contracts for the supply of goods and services for use on parks construction and maintenance projects.

Background

The supply of materials, works and services for use on parks construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of term contracts. As part of this process, the following three contracts commenced from the 1 October 2000 for the provision of various services for a two year contract period, closing on the 30 September 2002:

· Contract No W00129 - The provision of tree pruning and stump removal services within the City of Wanneroo for a period of two years.

· Contract No W00130 - The construction, development and testing of bores within the City of Wanneroo for a period of two years.

· Contract No W00131 – The supply and maintenance of bore hole pumping units within the City of Wanneroo for a period of two years

The extension for all three contracts are recommended to commence from 1 October 2002 and will remain in place until the 30 September 2003, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contracts.

Detail

The three contract agreements contain the following clause under the General Conditions of Contract:

Clause 1.1 - Contract Period

“This Contract will commence from 1 October 2000 for a period of 24 months and shall expire on 30 September 2002. The Principal may consider extending the Contract Period for an additional one-year to 30 September 2003 or a part thereof. If the Principal chooses to extend the Contract Period, such extension of this Contract shall be in writing in accordance with the same terms and conditions of this Contract and shall be at the discretion of the Principal.”

The Manager Operational Services and the Co-ordinator Parks Operations, in consultation with the Contracts Officer from the Contracts and Property Services business Unit, have evaluated the contract extension submissions and the amendments:

Contract No W00129 – The provision of tree pruning and stump removal services within the City of Wanneroo.

The City has previously awarded Contract No W00129 to Geoff’s Tree Services Pty Ltd. The contract requirement was reviewed and following the City’s invitation, Geoff’s Tree Services Pty Ltd has advised in writing of its willingness to extend the contract for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003 with all pricing schedules to remain the same with the exception of schedule 1A, item 1 and 2. A price increase of 10% has been requested for the pruning of trees on rural verges. Geoff’s Tree Service has justified the price rise for rural trees due to the excessive travelling time involved in this component of the contract. As rural trees account for approximately 5% of the total contract costs, this price increase is not considered unreasonable and it is therefore recommended to extend Contract No W00129 with Geoff’s Tree Service Pty Ltd for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003.

Contract No W00130 – The construction, development and testing of bores within the City of Wanneroo.

The City has previously awarded Contract No W00130 to Wintergreene Drilling. The contract requirement was reviewed and following the City’s invitation, Wintergreene Drilling Pty Ltd has advised in writing of its willingness to extend the contract for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003, subject to a nil % price rise for all items under the contract number W00130.

It is therefore recommended to extend Contract Number W00130 with Wintergreene Drilling Pty Ltd for the construction, developing and testing of bores within the City of Wanneroo for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003.

Contract No W00131 – The supply and maintenance of bore hole pumping units within the City of Wanneroo.

The City has previously awarded Contract No W00131 to Turbo Master Pumps Pty Ltd. The contract requirement was reviewed and following the City’s invitation, Turbo Master Pumps Pty Ltd has advised in writing of its willingness to extend the contract for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003 subject to a 5 % price rise for all items under the contract. Turbo Masters Pumps has justified the request for a price rise based on the (CPI) Index price rise of 3.2% and 1.8% price increases by manufacturers of finished components during the last year.

The CPI information, as available on the Australian Bureau of Statistics Website, has been analysed. CPI for Perth for the March Quarter 2002 increased by 3.2% in comparison to March Quarter 2001. CPI for all eight Australian capital cities for March Quarter 2002 increased by 2.9% in comparison to March Quarter 2001. Therefore, Turbo Master Pumps request for a price rise is within the average CPI increases for a 12 month period corresponding to the contract period and the additional price rise of 1.8% is not considered unreasonable It is therefore recommended to extend contract number W00131 with turbo Master Pumps Pty Ltd for the supply and maintenance of bore hole pumping units for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003.

Comment

Contract extensions for Contract No’s, W00129 – Geoff’s Tree Service Pty Ltd W00130 – Wintergreene Drilling Pty Ltd and W00131 – Turbo Master Pumps Pty Ltd are as per the existing contract agreement. The three companies have provided satisfactory service to the City under the existing contract arrangements.

Statutory Compliance

The contracts are recommended for extension as per clause 1:1 Contract Period and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The extent of expenditure associated with these tenders is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the four-year Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for the maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ACCEPTS the extension of Contract No W00129 from Geoffs Tree Services Pty Ltd for the Provision Of Tree Pruning And Stump Removal Services for a further period of 12 months to 30 September 2003, under the same terms and conditions of the current contract, with a 10% rate increase to Item 1& 2 of Schedule 1A only, being rural verge trees.

2. ACCEPTS the extension of Contract No W00130 from Wintergreene Drilling Pty Ltd for the Construction, Developing And Testing Of Bore Holes for a further period of 12 months to the 30 September 2003, under the same terms and conditions of the current contract with no adjustment to the contract rates.

3. ACCEPTS the extension of Contract No W00131 from Turbo Master Pty Ltd for The Supply And Maintenance Of Bore Hole Pumping Units for a further 12 month period to the 30 September 2003, under the same terms and conditions of the current contract, with a 5% increase to the contract rates for all items.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

13. Tender Number 02240 – The Construction Of A Timber Stairway For Beach Access At Sceptre Court, Two Rocks

File Ref: 63489

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachment: Nil

File Name: AATenNum.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendations for Tender Number 02240 – The Construction of a Timber Stairway for Beach Access at Sceptre Court, Two Rocks.

Background

Currently a boarded accessway terminates at the crest of a dune that falls steeply through a “blow out” area to a narrow beach. The lack of a formal beach access means that beach goers must walk up and down the face of the dune, which in turn is exacerbating the existing recessional problems.

Council has previously considered two reports on this matter and resolved as per detail below:

Report Number

Resolutions

TS 03-10/01

APPROVES the concept design as shown on Attachment 2 for the proposed upgrade of the beach access way opposite Sceptre Court, Two Rocks and authorises the commissioning of consultants to undertake the detailed design and cost estimate.

On completion of the detailed design and cost estimate, City Administration, REPORTS to Council the outcome prior to proceeding to tender.

TS 10-02/02

ACCEPTS the design of the beach accessway structure opposite Sceptre Court, Two Rocks shown on Attachments to this report.

AUTHORISES the calling of tenders for the construction of the beach accessway opposite Sceptre Court, Two Rocks, subject to receipt of Development Approval.

In accordance with the Council recommendation, a development application was submitted to the Western Australian Planning Commission and approval was granted by WAPC during July 2002. Specifications and tender drawings were then finalised by Halpern Glick Maunsell, the Consulting Engineers for this project.

Detail

Tender Number 02240 was advertised on 27 July 2002 and at close of tenders on 13 August 2002, three tender submissions were received. The tenderers were invited to submit a lump sum price for the scope of works and specifications defined in the tender documents. A summary of the tender submissions is tabulated below:

Tenderer	Lump Sum Price
Landscape Infrastructure	$45,080.00
Creative Building and Development	$96,730.00
Jomar Contracting	$93,618.00

Tenders have been evaluated by the consulting firm, Halpern Glick Maunsell Pty Ltd who were appointed to design, prepare documentation and administer the contract works. The evaluation was undertaken in accordance with the following assessment criteria:

· Price of the Works Offered

· Methodology for construction of foundations

· Tenderer’s Resources

· Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out works similar to the scope of works associated with this project

· Safety Management

The evaluation matrix has been prepared, which clearly rates Landscape Infrastructure higher than the other two tenderers. Landscape Infrastructure was then interviewed by the Consultant and requested to advise in writing that the submitted lump sum price includes the full scope of works specified in the tender document and that the works can be completed within the allocated timeframe. A reference check was also made to verify this tenderer’s capability to undertake these works.

(The Consultant is expected to interview the lowest priced tenderer on 23 August 2002 and present his report by 26 August 2002. This report will be amended accordingly and may be presented as a late report to Council on 3 September 2002).

The Consultant’s recommendation stated that the overall technical assessment, based on the selection criteria outlined in the tender document, rated -------------------------- as the preferred tenderer providing the best value for money.

Besides the scope of works included in the tender documents it is also proposed to remove the old worn out timber boardwalk and to construct a 2.5m wide compacted limestone or concrete pathway connecting the stairway to Sovereign Drive opposite the Sceptre Court intersection. It was proposed during the project design development stage that, in the event of sufficient savings against the project budget provisions being made, that a concrete pathway would also be constructed.

By accepting --------------------’s tender, the total estimated cost of the works including the outstanding consulting fees is summarised below:

ITEM DESCRIPTION	AMOUNT
Construction of stairway access – Tender Price including Provisional Sum of $10,000	*$45,080*
Removal of existing walkway and removal of timber	$2,000
Construction of approx. 100 metres of temporary access track (200 mm deep by 2.5m wide / 2.5m wide cast in-situ Concrete pathway	$2,500 or $5,000
Fencing of access pathway - post Construction inclusive of cleanup / remedial works / rehabilitation of dunes	$5,000
Fees/Approvals – various	$500
Sub Total	$57,580
Operational Services Unit Charges	$7,000
Outstanding Consultancy Fee	$5,000
Sub Total	$12,000
Estimated Total Project Cost	$69,580

Consultation

Local residents have consistently been requesting that the City provide a more permanent beach access facility in Two Rocks as the beach erosion process has caused the existing access facilities to be closed for long periods each year.

The Two Rocks Yanchep Residents Association has been consulted regarding this project. The City’s Manager Operational Services and Mr Brad Saunders from M P Rogers & Associates attended the Association’s meeting held on 24 September 2001 and outlined the details of the proposed project then. Throughout this entire consultation process, the only significant reservation that residents expressed was that the proposed access structure was not proposed to be a permanent all weather access solution. Another concern was that the proposal did not incorporate a ramp access to the beach that would provide for disabled access and more welcome access characteristics than lengthy stairways.

The practicalities of the situation that prevent the implementation of such a design change were explained at the Two Rocks Yanchep Residents Association Inc. meeting on 24 September 2001. However, an undertaking was provided at that meeting to scope the project to include a ramp down to the first landing and to incorporate seating on at least two sides of this viewing platform with a roof over. This will allow ramp access for the general public, including the disabled, even during periods when the annual winter erosion may prevent the use of the lower stairway sections of the structure.

Initially Two Rocks Yanchep Residents Association had some reservations due to non-provision of a ramp access but the Association has recognised the practicalities of the situation and has provided a letter of response which records its support for this proposal.

Comment

The construction of this Timber Stairway in a foreshore reserve is considered to be a unique project and --------------------- has indicated that it is has necessary skills and resources to undertake this construction. The Consultant, has also provided sufficient evidence that a thorough evaluation process has been undertaken to support their recommendation that the tender submitted by --------------------------- provides best value for money.

It is therefore recommended to accept the tender from ------------------------- for undertaking the works in accordance with Tender No 02240 at a lump sum price of $--,--- which includes a provisional sum of $10,000 to be expended only with the prior written authorisation of the Superintendent.

The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender compliance and assessment process and endorses the recommendations.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995.

Strategic Implications

These works support the Draft Strategic Plan Goal One “ To value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of the City”.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Funds for this project have been allocated in the City’s 2002/2003 Capital Works Budget as detailed below:

Project No : 2505

Funds allocated : $120,340

The likely expenditure as a result of accepting the ------------ tender is well within the available funds.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ACCEPTS Tender Number 02240 from --------------- for The construction of a Timber Stairway for Beach Access at Sceptre Court, Two Rocks, at a Lump Sum Price of -------------- which includes a provisional sum of $10,000.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Infrastructure

14. WALGA Initiative - Road Deterioration Modelling Study - Report Update

File Ref: R/0007V01

File Name: EAWALIni.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Benny Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachment: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Update for Council on changes in its funding contribution toward the Western Australian Local Government Association’s (WALGA) Road Deterioration Modelling Study Initiative

Background

At Council’s meeting on 26 February 2002, it was resolved to support WALGA’s initiative of instigating a study to improve the Deterioration Model Used in Western Australian Pavement Management Systems (Report No. TS08-02/02 refers). Council agreed to contribute $3,600 per annum for the next five years for three sites within the City (based on indicative costs of $1,200 per site/year).

The nominated sites for the study were:-

1. Marmion Avenue, Mindarie

2. Neaves Road, Mariginiup

3. Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo

The Road Deterioration Modelling Study is to be conducted by ARRB Transport Research.

Detail

ARRB Transport Research has now finalised its study costs with WALGA and has determined that the cost for each site will be $1,500 per annum over the next five years. This results in an increase in Council’s commitment of $900 per annum.

After further discussions with an ARRB Transport Research representative, it was decided by City Administration that the number of test sites within the City be reduced to two instead of the three nominated. The funding allocation would thus reduce from $3,600 per annum to $3,000 per annum. The sites nominated will now be :-

1. Marmion Avenue, Mindarie

2. Neaves Road, Mariginiup

Comment

It is considered that reducing the number of sites within the City to two would not adversely impact on the Study, with the sites remaining still being representative of the roads located within the City. There are sites that have been nominated in the Cities of Joondalup, Stirling and Swan which together with the City of Wanneroo sites will provide a good representation of roads within the region.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

As a result of the above changes, there will be a saving of $600 in the current operating budget. Council’s funding towards the Study will now continue at $3,000 per annum for the remaining four years.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the changes in funding contribution towards WALGA’s Road Deterioration Modelling Study Initiative from $3,600 to $3,000 per annum for the study’s five years duration, with the two nominated sites being Marmion Avenue, Mindarie and Neaves Road, Mariginup.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Funding and Budget

15. Perth Biodiversity Project - "Bushlinks" Project - Budget Variation

File Ref: PR/0002VO1

File Name: FAPerBio.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachment: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a budget variation to reflect the receipt of Perth Biodiversity Project Funding.

Background

Council resolved at its meeting on 26 February 2002 to support in principle the “Bushlinks” Bushland Management Project joint submission from the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup and a Community Advisory Group for funding a “Bushlinks” Project. (Item TS09-02/02 refers).

The proposed funding arrangements were as follows:

Perth Biodiversity Project Funding (WALGA) $25,000

City of Wanneroo $12,500

City of Joondalup $12,500

$50,000

Detail

This project has been approved by WALGA and a cheque for the amount of $13,750 ($12,500 grant plus $1,250 GST) has been presented to the City of Wanneroo. This funding has been made available on the basis that the local government is responsible for the management of the grant funds.

Consultation

The project submission was developed on the basis of providing important ”seeding” funding for implementing best practice bushland management and providing for a participative and inclusive community. This will be a community based project and through localised consultative processes, the community will be engaged to assist on this project.

Comment

The $12,500 contribution from the City of Wanneroo towards this project will be funded from the Parks Operating budget for officer support to the project and commissioning of bushland teams for the removal of weeds etc. It is not a capital item, but more of a bushland maintenance and upgrade project.

There has been no provision made in the budget for the grant and a variation is required to reflect this grant income and associated expenditure.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The proposal is consistent with the City's Policy 3.2.2. for Environmental Sustainability, which has 3 objectives, to:

· Protect and enhance the natural and human environments for the benefit of present and future generations.

· Minimise as far as practicable, any adverse environmental impacts associated with its activities

· Take advantage of environmentally beneficial opportunities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The budget will need to be amended to reflect the income from WALGA and the operating budget increased accordingly.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ACCEPTS the Perth Biodiversity Project Grant of $12,500 from WALGA for the “Bushlinks” Bushland Management Project.

2. NOTES the following budget variation to reflect the receipt of Perth Biodiversity Project Grant.

INCOME

GL NUMBER	Present Budget	Additional Amount	Revised Amount
51 60 72 721 1599 0001 Other Government Grants and Subsidies	0	$12,500	$12,500

EXPENDITURE

Cost Code	From	To	Description
51 60 72 721 1599 0001	$12,500		Other Government Grants and Subsidies
51 60 72 721 4615 0001		$12,500	Parks Operating Budget - External Materials Purchase

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Corporate Services

Information Services

16. Extension Of Contract Number 01228 - Supply And Delivery Of Personal Computers

File Ref: 01228T

File Name: AAExtofC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by G Hayhurst Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by G Hayhurst Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider an extension of the Contract Period to Contract Number 01228 – Supply and Delivery of Personal Computers.

Background

Council, at its meeting on 5 September 2001 resolved to adopt a three (3) year Replacement Programme for its IT Hardware (Item CS03-09/01 refers). Subsequently, at its meeting on 6 November 2001, the Council identified funding for the first year of the programme and authorised the calling of tenders for the acquisition of approximately 96 desktop personal computers (PCs). In December 2001, the Council resolved to accept the tender submitted by Dell Computer Pty Ltd offering to supply and deliver PCs with 17 inch monitors, for the period up until 30 June 2002 at a cost of $1,530 per unit.

This year the City has budgeted to replace up to 119 existing PCs for staff and Elected Members and has made provision for an additional 12 PCs for new staff.

Detail

The current contract contains a clause in the General Conditions of Contract under the heading “Contract Period”, that allows the Principal (City) to consider extending the Contract Period for an additional one (1) year. If the Principal chooses to extend the Contract Period, such extension of the Contract shall be in writing in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the current Contract and shall be at the discretion of the Principal.

Dell Computer Pty Ltd has offered to extend Contract Number 01228 for a further twelve (12) month period with no change or increase to the Contract Rates. The Contract extension notes that the Principal (City) shall require between 90 and 120 PCs in the financial year 2002/2003. The following table shows the Minimum PC Specification required by the City, the specification accepted in the original tender and the proposed specification for the contract extension.

Item	Min. Requirements	Contract Specification	Contract Extension Specification
Case Type	Desktop or Mini Tower	Dell Optiplex GX240 Small Desktop	Dell Optiplex GX260 Small Desktop
Processor	Pentium III 1 GHz	Intel Pentium IV 1.5GHz	Intel Pentium IV 1.8GHz (845G Chipset) 400MHz FSB
Memory	128Mb RAM	128Mb RAM	128Mb DDR SDRAM
Hard Disk Drive	20Gb	20Gb HDD	20Gb HDD
Monitor	15” or 17”	15”/17” Dell SVGA	15”/17” Dell SVGA
Power Supply	Australian Standard	180W Australian Compliant	180W Australian Compliant
Keyboard	104 Key Standard	Dell 104 Keyboard in Midnight Grey.	Dell 104 Keyboard in Midnight Grey.
Mouse	MS 2 Button with wheel	MS 2 Button wheel mouse	Microsoft Intelli Mouse
LAN Card	10/100 Internal Microsoft Windows 2000, remote installation services PXE compliant network card and must be on Microsoft hardware compatibility list for Windows 2000	Integrated 3COM fast Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC	Integrated 3COM fast Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC
Operating System	Windows 2000 Professional, Service Pack 2	Windows 2000 Pro., SP2	Windows 2000 Pro., SP2
Warranty/Maintenance	3 yr. Next business day, onsite or Tenderers premises, parts & labour	3 year on-site parts & labour. Next business day repair for City of Wanneroo	3 year on-site parts & labour. Next business day repair for City of Wanneroo

It can be seen that the primary difference is the increased processor speed (1.8GHz) of the proposed specification.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Extension of the Contract Period for Contract Number 01228 is in accordance with the existing Contract and Dell Computer Pty Ltd have provided satisfactory service and products to the City over the past twelve (12) months. Given that the Dell Computer Pty Ltd proposal is for a higher specification unit at the same price as the initial contract and is still considered excellent value in today’s market place, it is recommended to extend Contract Number 01228 with Dell Computer Pty Ltd for the supply and delivery of personal computers for a further period of twelve (12) months to 30 June 2003.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

This extension is consistent with the City’s strategy of a three (3) year IT Hardware Replacement Programme.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The replacement and the twelve (12) additional PCs are fully funded through the Other Capital – New Initiatives section of the City of Wanneroo 2002/2003 budget.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES a twelve (12) month extension (from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003) to Contract Number 01228 (with Dell Computer Pty Ltd) – Supply and Delivery of Personal Computers, under the same terms and conditions of the current contract with no adjustment to the contract rates.

Finance

17. Warrant Of Payments - For The Period To 31 July 2002

File Ref: S13/0002V01

File Name: BBWarofP.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 16 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 16 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of July 2002, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.

Background

Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.

In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.

Detail

Funds

Vouchers

Amount

City of Wanneroo -

Director Corporate Services Advance Account

Cheque Numbers

EFT Document Numbers

27372 - 28232

50000358 – 50000396

$4,468,928.88

City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account

000177 – 000178

$7,390,341.81

At the close of July 2002 outstanding creditors amounted to $2,231,934.61.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

The list of cheques and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of July 2002 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

Statutory Compliance

Nil.

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council RECEIVES the list of cheques drawn for the month of July 2002, as summarised and listed below:-

Funds

Vouchers

Amount

City of Wanneroo -

Director Corporate Services Advance Account

Cheque Numbers

EFT Document Numbers

27372 - 28232

50000358 – 50000396

$4,468,928.88

City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account

000177 – 000178

$7,390,341.81

Warrant of Payments for the Month of July 2002

City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account

Cheque No.	Cheque Date	Vendor Name	Amount	Details
7372	04-Jul-02	JOONDALUP COURT	$742.05	9 WARRANTS
27373	04-Jul-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	$284.08	S ATIA
27374	04-Jul-02	WHITFORD MARQUEE & PARTY HIRE	$482.35	HIRE EQUIPMENT HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE ARTWALL UNVEILING
27375	04-Jul-02	MARKETING & TRANSPORT CONSULTANCY	$2,508.00	COSTS OF TRUCK - BUSINESS SERVICES
27376	04-Jul-02	MEERILINGA TRAINING COLLEGE	$407.00	TRAINING WORKSHOP "POSITIVE INTERACTIONS WITH CHILDREN" - CINDY DAVIS AND SHARON SNELL
27377	04-Jul-02	AMCON SOLUTIONS PTY LTD	$1,188.00	CONSULTANT SIMMONS MR PAUL 12HRS AT 90 HRS - IS
27378	04-Jul-02	HAMES SHARLEY	$1,100.00	COST ANALYSIS - QUINNS MINDARIE SURF CLUB
27379	04-Jul-02	GEARY SIGNS	$159.50	SUPPLY AND FIT SIGN AT GIRRAWHEEN DOWN
27380	04-Jul-02	TREVOR HOWARD	$100.00	PRESENTERS FEE - "SMART CLUBS" SEMINAR PROGRAM
27381	04-Jul-02	FESA	$2,230.00	A/HOURS ATTENDANCE TO FIRE ALARM MONITORING LINE ASSESSMENT CHARNWOOD & SHAMROCK PARK, TWO ROCKS TASK 618
27382	04-Jul-02	DEPARTMENT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$33.00	PANARAMA - METRO NORTH
27383	04-Jul-02	RENTOKIL INITIAL PTY LTD	$1,082.40	CONTRACT CHARGES
27384	04-Jul-02	PLAYGROUP ASSOCIATION OF WA	$397.00	SUPPLIES FOR FAMILY DAY CARE PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
27385	04-Jul-02	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$755.09	POUNDAGE W/EX 430/2002 934/2002/1905/2000/1216/2002
27386	04-Jul-02	IMATECH	$196.68	GOLDEND PASTE - RETIC SUPPLIES
27387	04-Jul-02	DRIVESHAFT BALANCING SERVICES	$1,425.00	SUPPLY AND REPAIR DRIVESHAFT
27388	04-Jul-02	COLUMBIA PRESS PTY LTD	$596.20	20 X 4 PRESS AD ISSUE 782
27389	04-Jul-02	LYLA ELLIOTT FAMILY DAY CARE SCHEME	$317.79	ADVERTISING COSTS
27390	04-Jul-02	CABAZON PTY LTD	$588.17	TELEPHONE COSTS FOR CONTRACT'S DURATION -VARIOUS COSTS RELATING TO COUNCIL ART COLLECTION FILM & FILM DEVELOPMENT - VARIOUS COSTS RELATING TO COUNCIL ART COLLECTION
27391	04-Jul-02	ERIKA MCDERMOTT	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27392	04-Jul-02	NATIONAL FAMILY DAY CARE	$148.50	MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL NOTICE - FAMILY DAY CARE MEMBERS
27393	04-Jul-02	BIZZACA & ASSOCIATES	$1,575.75	HISTORICAL RESEARCH CONSULTANT
27394	04-Jul-02	TEENA HUGGETT	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27395	04-Jul-02	ST ANTHONY'S P & F	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE - BOOKING CANCELLED
27396	04-Jul-02	WAYNE SUMMERTON MOWING	$148.50	D HARRISON 16 DRAMMEN ELBOW MERRIWA
27397	04-Jul-02	L G C S A A	$60.00	TWO SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITES GUIDES
27398	04-Jul-02	MINDARIE VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP	$50.00	BOND REFUND KEY HIRE GUMBLOSSOM SPORTS HALL
27399	04-Jul-02	NATIONAL CHILDCARE ACCREDITATION COUNCIL INC	$88.00	20 X QA PUBLICATIONS FOR FAMILY DAY CARE
27400	04-Jul-02	SIMON WALSH	$50.00	ENTERTAINMENT FOR ALEX HGHTS DAY CTRE
27401	04-Jul-02	REG HOLMES	$40.00	BOND REFUND HIRE BANKSIA ROOM 28/5/02
27402	04-Jul-02	THOMAS EDMEADES	$6.60	LOST BOOK RETURNED
27403	04-Jul-02	Z RIZONKO	$3.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27404	04-Jul-02	GAIL KRISKOVICH	$35.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27405	04-Jul-02	BRETT TURNER	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27406	04-Jul-02	LESLIE MOULE	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27407	04-Jul-02	ALWYN WHITE	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27408	04-Jul-02	SUSAN BEST	$57.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27409	04-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27410	04-Jul-02	MARIA MONTANARO	$40.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27411	04-Jul-02	JASON DAVID RILEY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27412	04-Jul-02	MICHELLE & R LUCAS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27413	04-Jul-02	J HAUPAPA & T RAUMATI	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27414	04-Jul-02	JAN & W BOBELA	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27415	04-Jul-02	SAMANTHA A PASK	$317.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27416	04-Jul-02	GRAHAM SMITH & L HASTINGS	$252.44	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27417	04-Jul-02	DARREN & KIM ARLAND	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27418	04-Jul-02	DEERING AUTRONICS	$352.19	CAMERA REPAIRS ON VEHICLE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27419	04-Jul-02	B & G CHAMBERS	$660.00	CATERING FOR BFAC MTG FOR 20 PEOPLE ON 26/6/2 CATERING FOR 20 GUESTS & ANTIPASTO PLATTER
27420	04-Jul-02	BUNYA LANDSCAPES	$5,912.50	VARIATION ON LIMESTONE STEPS & RETAINING WALL AT BERT TOGNO PK AND LIMELIGHT THEATRE
27421	04-Jul-02	PALUDA PTY LTD	$7,562.50	CONSULTING SERVICE - CLARKSON PROJECT AND BUTLER JOINT VENTURE PROJECT - INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT
27422	04-Jul-02	MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS	$400.00	2 X HIPHOP WORKSHOPS FOR CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE OPEN DAY
27423	04-Jul-02	RECREATION CAMPS & RESERVES BOARD	$465.00	DEPOSITE ON CAMP SITE - BUCKLEY OUTDOOR REC CAMP
27424	04-Jul-02	DR C T WONG	$3,485.00	IMMUNISATION CLINICS MONTH MAY AND JUNE
27425	05-Jul-02	HONEYWELL SECONDHAND SHOP	$245.00	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
27426	05-Jul-02	BOLLIG DESIGN GROUP LTD	$13,750.00	HAINSWORTH LEISURE CTRE REDEVELOPMENT
27427	05-Jul-02	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$495.00	HIRE OF BOBCAT FOR THE MRF - FEB 2002
27428	05-Jul-02	GLAZEWELL P/L	$413.00	REPLACE GLASS TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27429	05-Jul-02	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$894.25	MILK SUPPLIES FOR THE CITY OF WANNEROO
27430	05-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY	$1,250.00	10 PEOPLE - FIRST AID COURSE 21/5/2
27431	05-Jul-02	ALINTA GAS	$5,714.89	GAS SUPPLY TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27432	05-Jul-02	AVIS	$251.53	HIRE OF TARAGO FOR PLAYGROUP HIRE OF 12 SEAT BUS - BANKSIA GROVE PLAYGROUP
27433	05-Jul-02	ACE INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTORS	$159.50	CALIBRATE WORKSHOP RAY TECH TEMP GUN
27434	05-Jul-02	ART SUPPORT PTY LTD	$269.50	3.5HRS ART INSTALLATION
27435	05-Jul-02	BELL HEALTH	$307.25	SERVICES TO CACP AND HACC CLIENTS
27436	05-Jul-02	BEST SIGNS & PRINT	$66.00	STICKER TO BACK OF EXISTING BANNER FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
27437	05-Jul-02	BAILEYS FERTILISERS	$3,775.20	FERTILISER FOR PARKS AND GARDENS
27438	05-Jul-02	BEST LOOK PAINTING & DECORATING CONTRACTORS	$3,146.00	EXT PAINTING TO GUMBLOSSOM CRAFT ROOM & TOILET BLOCK PAINTING AT KINGSWAY RECREATION ROOMS PAINTING OF DEPOT HOUSE PAINTING GUMBLOSSOM COMM CRAFT ROOM
27439	05-Jul-02	COURIER AUSTRALIA	$470.18	COURIER CHARGES
27440	05-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	$348.70	LOST LIBRARY BOOKS
27441	05-Jul-02	CABCHARGE	$59.89	COMMUNITY SERVICES CABCHARGE
27442	05-Jul-02	CITY OF WANNEROO MUNI FUND	$251.93	B TREBY TRAVEL ALLOWANCE TO RATES
27443	05-Jul-02	CHILDREN'S BOOK COUNCIL OF AUST	$42.90	CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK MATERIALS AWARD STICKERS
27444	05-Jul-02	CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD	$1,980.74	REGO'S 1ARF538, 1ASZ162, WN31659, WN31660
27445	05-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	$6,600.26	RECORDS SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT
27446	05-Jul-02	CHEMAG PTY LTD	$699.16	ENVIROSPRAY
27447	05-Jul-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	$240.00	OVER 50'S EXERCISE CLASS YANCHEP COMMUNITY CTR
27448	05-Jul-02	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	$2,585.50	REFRESHMENTS/CATERING PROVIDED AT VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS CONTINTAL BREAKFAST - 20/06/02 CITZ CATERING - 24/06/02
27449	05-Jul-02	CITY OF SWAN	$5.50	BOOK LOST BY READER
27450	05-Jul-02	CONTEK COMMUNICATIONS	$939.44	REPLACE EXISTING TELSTRA PIT AT FRANKLIN RD AS PER QUOTE TO BE COMPLETED BY 13.6.02 QUOTE NO 00006852
27451	05-Jul-02	CARRAMAR COASTAL NURSERY	$3,558.28	VARIOUS PLANTS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS
27452	05-Jul-02	DUN & BRADSTREET AUST	$289.85	D & B REPORT FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
27453	05-Jul-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF - MARANGAROO	$13,468.83	MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE COMMISSIONS 15 - 31 MAY 02
27454	05-Jul-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF-CARRAMAR	$12,540.15	COMMISSION 15/05/02 TO 31/05/02
27455	05-Jul-02	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$1,270.50	DIGITAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
27456	05-Jul-02	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$959.25	TITLE SEARCH FEES
27457	05-Jul-02	DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS	$274.75	REPAIR TO FIRE SERVICES RADIO
27458	05-Jul-02	D & M LAUNDRY SERVICE	$200.26	LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR JUN
27459	05-Jul-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$288.00	PETTY CASH
27460	05-Jul-02	ENTYRE RUBBER	$10,771.20	CRICKET PITCH PROTECTORS
27461	05-Jul-02	FURNITURE SPOT	$372.00	CHAIRS/TABLES/PLANT STANDS - HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE
27462	05-Jul-02	FLORENTINO HOLDINGS	$330.00	DRIVER TRAINING FOR YTH RALLY PROGRAMME
27463	05-Jul-02	GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$68.95	PETTY CASH
27464	05-Jul-02	GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM P/CASH	$27.90	PETTY CASH
27465	05-Jul-02	GRONBEK SECURITY	$75.00	SUPPLY THREE LOCKS FOR CABINET - G MORROW
27466	05-Jul-02	GLENFORDS TOOL CENTRE	$414.00	MAK BLOWER VAC FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
27467	05-Jul-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$11,171.82	RECREATIONAL AND RESPITE CARE FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS
27468	05-Jul-02	HURI-CAIN SPORTS	$74.25	SPUERK SIZE 7 SYNTHETIC LEATHER BASKETBALLS – YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAMS
27469	05-Jul-02	INST OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING (WA) INC	$1,018.00	MEMBERSHIPS - DENNIS BLAIR, ROB KORENHOF SEMINAR – G SHAW
27470	05-Jul-02	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	$2,346.30	CLEANING OF GUTTERS AT DEPOT POUND TRANSPORTABLE CLEANING OF GUTTERS AT 935 WANNEROO ROAD SUPPLY CEILING TILES - GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY CONSTRUCT WALLS & DEMOLISH OF WALLS FILL IN DOOR OPENING IN DAY CARE CENTRE AT THE NEW CIVIC CENTRE
27471	05-Jul-02	K & F CONCRETE	$3,999.60	REMOVE TREE ROOTS UNDER FOOTING SAVONA GROVE MINDARIE REPAIR FENCING - TAYWOOD AVE WANNEROO INSTALL SEATS AT YANCHEP REC CENTRE WALLS AND PIPES FOR RURAL CROSS OVER
27472	05-Jul-02	KEYS BROS REMOVALS & STORAGE	$18.75	COLLECTION & DELIVERY OF LIBRARY SHELVING PLUS A CREDIT INVOICE
27473	05-Jul-02	KBE BUILDING SERVICES PTY LTD	$638.00	SUPPLY & INSTALL TWO LOCKABLE DOORS TO CONCEAL THE HOT WATER UNIT AT WARRADALE PARK COMMUNITY CENTRE
27474	05-Jul-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	$630.52	COURIER CHARGES
27475	05-Jul-02	MOBILE LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$28.30	PETTY CASH
27476	05-Jul-02	METROCOUNT	$110.00	STAINLESS STEEL SECURITY CABLE - INFRASTRUCTURE, TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
27477	05-Jul-02	MOVE CLOTHING & LINEN SUPPLIES	$247.50	STAFF UNIFORMS
27478	05-Jul-02	MASTER CRAFT PROFESSIONAL PAINTING & DECORATING	$2,552.00	PAINTING OF VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27479	05-Jul-02	MERCURY FIRE SAFETY	$719.95	REPLACE FAULTY BATTERIES FIRE ALARM PANEL EXTINGUISHER SERVICING
27480	05-Jul-02	BENTLEY KEHOE CONSULTING GROUP	$5,747.50	PURCHASE OF MAPP SYSTEM
27481	05-Jul-02	MOBILE SHRED ONSITE	$77.00	MS 240 LT BINS ON-SITE SHRED
27482	05-Jul-02	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$4.84	COURIER CHARGES
27483	05-Jul-02	NON-ORGANIC DISPOSALS	$1,564.20	DISPOSAL OF GLASS MRF BADGERUP APRIL 2002
27484	05-Jul-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	$176.00	4 HRS LABOUR – DEPOT WORKSHOP
27485	05-Jul-02	OUR COMMUNITY PTY LTD	$360.10	GOLD PASS EASYGRANTS NEWSLETTER/RAISING FUNDS NEWSLETTER
27486	05-Jul-02	POOL TABLE MAN	$55.00	SERVICE & LEVEL POOL TABLE AT WANNEROO SEN CITZ
27487	05-Jul-02	PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PETTY CASH	$441.65	PETTY CASH
27488	05-Jul-02	PERTH ZOO	$91.00	ZOO VISIT ON 23/5/2 - BANKSIA GROVE ABORIGINAL GROUP
27489	05-Jul-02	PHOTO PERTH WHOLESALE	$858.00	OLYMPUS C200 DIGITAL CAMERA & RAPIDCHARGERS - FAMILY DAY CARE SERVICES
27490	05-Jul-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	$889.40	BROOM HANDLES, BRUSHES AND BROOMS FOR DEPOT STORE BROOM SEGMENTS FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
27491	05-Jul-02	SCOTT PRINT	$4,394.50	PRINTING OF COW PRESENTATION FOLDERS
27492	05-Jul-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$19,484.41	MOBILE CALL CHARGE SUMMARY FROM 01/06/02 TO 01/07/02
27493	05-Jul-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$236.80	MOBILE NET CHARGES - LIBRARY SERVICES A DAWES 0520106410
27494	05-Jul-02	TREE GUILD OF WA INC	$137.50	2002 MEMBERSHIP - PARKS MAINTENANCE
27495	05-Jul-02	TURF GRASS PLUS	$1,760.00	TERRACOTTEM
27496	05-Jul-02	URBAN SK8ER PTY LTD	$30.36	PRIZES FOR SKATE COMPETITION
27497	05-Jul-02	WESTSIDE CONCRETE CONTRACTORS	$974.60	CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTPATH CNR CROMWELL & THE AVENUE
27498	05-Jul-02	WANNEROO REC OFFICE PETTY CASH	$44.05	PETTY CASH
27499	05-Jul-02	WATER CORPORATION	$254.10	WATER SUPPLIES AND METER REPAIR RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
27500	05-Jul-02	W A LOCAL GOVT SUPERANNUATION	$201,664.97	SUPERANNUATION FOR JUNE 2002
27501	05-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$103,555.60	POWER SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS COW LOCATIONS, RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE X 2
27502	05-Jul-02	WESTWOOD TIMBERS	$207.14	KARRI GREEN STR 3 SAWN
27503	05-Jul-02	WANNEROO PASTRY HOUSE	$34.60	JAM DONUTS/ECLAIRS/ PROFITEROLE/WHITE MUD CAKE - COUNCILLORS
27504	05-Jul-02	WANN LIBRARIES CENTRAL SVCS P/C	$60.30	PETTY CASH
27505	05-Jul-02	W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC.	$14,388.66	INTRO TO LOCAL GOVT ACT – FINANCE - 23/04/02 MAY MARKETFORCE ADVERTISING
27506	05-Jul-02	WEST COAST DJ	$300.00	TWO ROCKS DANCE PARTY 21/06/02
27507	05-Jul-02	LAURA VISEE	$430.00	PRINTING OF 86 SUMMONS
27508	05-Jul-02	JOONDALUP COURT	$83.00	RE-ISSUE W/EX 388/2001
27509	05-Jul-02	FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY	$390.00	LODGING OF 13 RECORDS
27510	10-Jul-02	JANE COFFEY & ASSOCIATES	$654.50	PPD CLASSESS.RISK MANAGEMENT, RECORDS OFFICER, COMMERCIAL SUPERVISOR WASTE.MARKETING OFFICER
27511	10-Jul-02	HOMESWEST RENTALS	$4,771.22	P/N 160322 REFUND RATES DUE TO SUBDIVISION
27512	10-Jul-02	WANNEROO AMATEUR FOOTBALL CLUB	$50.00	BOND REFUND
27513	10-Jul-02	SPINELESS WONDERS WILDLIFE EDUCATION INCURSIANS	$185.00	PRESENTATION ON 19/07/02 - SCHOOL HOLIDAY ACTIVITY
27514	10-Jul-02	MICHAEL HAYES	$50.00	KEYHOLDER OF THE WANNEROO ROAD BOARD MUSEUM
27515	10-Jul-02	KEYSTART LOANS LTD	$89.46	PROPERTY 184034 - OVERPAID PROPERTY SOLD
27516	10-Jul-02	BOTANIC GOLF GARDENS	$55.00	10 DEVON TEAS - COFFEE MORNING FOR BANKSIA GROVE COMM CENTRE
27517	10-Jul-02	DEWSONS MERRIWA	$29.70	GROCERIES FOR QUINNS ROCKS EXTREMES GROUPS
27518	10-Jul-02	JAN LUCKHURST	$51.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27519	10-Jul-02	L SNAPE	$270.00	HONORARIUM FOR THE CURATOR OF COCKMAN HOUSE
27520	10-Jul-02	M MUNRO	$270.00	HONORARIUM FOR THE CURATOR OF BUCKINGHAM HOUSE
27521	10-Jul-02	KERRICK INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT	$163.57	PRESSURE CLEANER REPAIRS
27522	10-Jul-02	YANCHEP RED HAWKS FOOTBALL CLUB	$800.00	BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE AT PHIL RENKIN FUNCTION ROOM ON 06-07/07/02 BOND REFUND - OLDHAM RESERVE PARK 30/06/02
27523	10-Jul-02	K L M CONSULTANTS	$3,300.00	TASK PROCEDURE CHECKLIST 15/05/02 TO 26/06/02
27524	10-Jul-02	JULIA ALTIERI	$72.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27525	10-Jul-02	PAUL KIRCHNER	$24.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27526	10-Jul-02	KIM READER	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27527	10-Jul-02	FLEETCARE	$506.91	OTHER ACQUISITIONS FLEET ACCOUNT
27528	10-Jul-02	PHILIPPA ROGERS	$80.60	REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
27529	10-Jul-02	MICHAEL GODFREY	$24.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27530	10-Jul-02	DANIELS SHARPSMART AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$70.44	MEDIUM 22LT YELLOW BIN
27531	10-Jul-02	MERRIWA CHINESE RESTURANT	$27.50	RANGER MANAGEMENT TRAINING
27532	10-Jul-02	SIMON RUSHFORTH	$35.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27533	10-Jul-02	LAURA GREEN	$60.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27534	10-Jul-02	GORDON SADLER	$54.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27535	10-Jul-02	REFRESH PURE WATER	$187.00	15 LT REFILL, CONTAINER. 2 TAP ROOM & COLD FRIDGE COOLER, PLASTIC CUPS & CUP HOLDER - CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE OPEN DAY
27536	10-Jul-02	KITE KENETICS	$250.00	TWO HOUR KITE DISPLAY & WORKSHOP
27537	10-Jul-02	J M ARCHER	$154.43	PROPERTY 185195 - OVERPAID
27538	10-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27539	10-Jul-02	HELEN BUNT	$22.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27540	10-Jul-02	AMANDA BRADDON	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27541	10-Jul-02	CAROL CONNELLY	$3.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27542	10-Jul-02	MONIQUE EVANS	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27543	10-Jul-02	DOREEN BACHOP	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27544	10-Jul-02	SAMANTHA YOUNG	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUNDS
27545	10-Jul-02	LEONI NORTON	$300.00	BOND REFUND GUMBLOSSOM ACTIVITY ROOM 1 29/6/02
27546	10-Jul-02	MS M PURDY	$213.50	PROPERTY 125552 PENSION REBATE
27547	10-Jul-02	ESTATE OF LATE INIS E ELSTON	$213.50	PROPERTY 140739 PENSION REBATE
27548	10-Jul-02	MR & MRS WILSON	$213.50	PROPERTY 140867 PENSION REBATE
27549	10-Jul-02	MRS D HEMING	$112.28	PROPERTY 166176
27550	10-Jul-02	MS C LEE	$192.44	PROPERTY 166616 PENSION REBATE
27551	10-Jul-02	MS E GROVES	$107.65	PROPERTY 179000 PENSION REBATE
27552	10-Jul-02	MR G HASLUCK	$141.95	PROPERTY 184349 PENSION REBATE
27553	10-Jul-02	NEWEAGLE NOMINEES PTY LTD	$5,276.64	P/N 199063 & 199064 REFUND RATES DUE TO SUCCESSFUL OBJECTION AGAINST VALUATION
27554	10-Jul-02	ROXANNE OLDEN	$26.77	P/N 141411 PENSION REBATE PROP SOLD
27555	10-Jul-02	CHERIE CHRISTO	$300.00	BOND REFUND - WDALE ROOM 2 23-6-02
27556	10-Jul-02	ROY WESTERN - WEMBLEY	$155.00	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE - RENTAL PROPERTY
27557	10-Jul-02	SMITH BROUGHTON & SONS	$3,946.47	PLANT NO 96694 TENDER02232 TRUCK INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT
27558	10-Jul-02	GO NETWORKING	$990.00	PRESENTATION ON NETWORKING SKILLS
27559	10-Jul-02	TRACY VALLANCE	$50.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE WDALE SUB ROOM 1 15/5/02-3/7/02
27560	10-Jul-02	BRENDA BLAIR	$30.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27561	10-Jul-02	NORMAN CONSTABLE	$60.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27562	10-Jul-02	TINA LISIECKI	$60.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27563	10-Jul-02	SHIRLEY CAMPBELL	$20.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICE
27564	10-Jul-02	MATHEW NEVILLE	$300.00	BOND REFUND AHCH MAIN HALL 21-22/06/02
27565	10-Jul-02	DANIQUE RIKY	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE AT WANNEROO SHOWGROUND FOR THE 21-22/06/02
27566	10-Jul-02	TIFFANY EVANS	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE WCC KITCHEN (MH) 07/07/02
27567	10-Jul-02	CRAIG ASHLEY STARCEVICH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27568	10-Jul-02	TANYA BLAKE	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE WARRADALE KITCHEN 07/07/02
27569	10-Jul-02	SJ BEATTIE & J KEYS	$170.94	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27570	10-Jul-02	MECHAIEL FARAG	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27571	10-Jul-02	MIRA RIAD	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE AT COMMUNITY ROOM 1 06-07/07/02
27572	10-Jul-02	EMMA L VLADICH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27573	10-Jul-02	RACHAEL J & TS NIEMANN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27574	10-Jul-02	CG & T MANGONON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27575	10-Jul-02	PA & SL BULLARD	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27576	10-Jul-02	DEAN L LAFRENAIS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27577	10-Jul-02	MARK NEVELDSEN & S CAMERON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27578	10-Jul-02	MA PICKERING & ML HIGHLAND	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27579	10-Jul-02	AM CULL & L H L LYE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27580	10-Jul-02	WENDY ANNE KRESS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27581	10-Jul-02	SHANE & TRACEY GRAHAM	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27582	10-Jul-02	SIMON SCHMITT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27583	10-Jul-02	KENNETH & ROBYN WHITTLE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27584	10-Jul-02	TRACEY C HAIMES	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27585	10-Jul-02	HC & JT THORNICROFT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27586	10-Jul-02	DAVID J MAAS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27587	10-Jul-02	CAROLE & M STEDMAN	$288.05	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27588	10-Jul-02	EDWARD ALLAN HODGKINSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27589	10-Jul-02	MARIA BERTONE	$198.00	VOLUNTEERS PAYMENT
27590	10-Jul-02	MARIA HASSAN	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE AHCH MAIN HALL 27/4/02
27591	10-Jul-02	SHANE IMRAY	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE WSCC KITCHEN
27592	10-Jul-02	ALLBEND ENGINEERING	$3,190.00	TO SUPPLY 10 OFF S/S INSERT & PINS
27593	10-Jul-02	BEAUREPAIRES	$176.12	TYRE REPAIRS TO PLANT 99013
27594	10-Jul-02	C & E M HARMER	$89.80	14/04/02 TO 11/05/02 PAPER DELIVERY
27595	10-Jul-02	PROCESS WELDING & MAINT SVCS	$151.80	REPAIRS TO DESIFIER CONSUMABLES. DC LABOUR
27596	10-Jul-02	ROLLISTON ENGINEERING	$9,999.99	OIL WASTE STORAGE PLATFORM
27597	10-Jul-02	SOILAND GARDEN SUPPLIERS	$66,322.09	MULCHING OF GREENWASTE AT BADGERUP ROAD
27598	10-Jul-02	MARY ADAMSON	$60.00	VOLUNTEER FOR DAY CARE CENTRES
27599	10-Jul-02	CITY OF WANNEROO	$4,550.00	P/N 198249 PAYMENT WAS RECEIPTED INCORRECTLY $4550.00 TO BE TRANSFERRED TO A DIFFERENT ACCOUNT
27600	10-Jul-02	DALE ALCOCK HOMES	$297.03	P/N 198276 PAID TWICE
27601	10-Jul-02	ROD HANNAN	$36.00	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27602	10-Jul-02	MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS	$200.00	B DANCE WORKSHOP AT HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE
27603	10-Jul-02	WANNEROO BUS LINK	$495.00	BUS HIRE - GOLD PROGRAM FROM WANNEROO REC CTR TO NEW NORCIA
27604	10-Jul-02	AUSTRALIA POST	$5,195.11	REPLY PAID LETTERS, ESSENGER POST, GENERAL STAMPS LABELS UDS ITEM CHARGES
27605	10-Jul-02	AUSTRALIA POST	$7,278.84	MAIL PREPARATION MONTH JUNE 2002
27606	10-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION	$99.00	SUBSCRIPTION FEES - AUSTRALIAN CONSUMERS ASSOC. - FINANCIAL COUNSELLORS
27607	10-Jul-02	AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS	$7.00	BEING PAYROLL DED F/E 5/7/02
27608	10-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27609	10-Jul-02	ALINTA GAS	$137.00	262853750 18 LINTO WY (ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CARE) ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA
27610	10-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$19.60	PETTY CASH
27611	10-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION	$103.20	BEING PAYROLL DED F/E 5/0/02
27612	10-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$60.60	PETTY CASH
27613	10-Jul-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
27614	10-Jul-02	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	$807.69	BEING PAYROLL DED F/E 12/0/02 APPLICATION NO. 3606010501
27615	10-Jul-02	BELL HEALTH	$147.05	PROVISION OF SERVICES HACC CLIENTS FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 01/01/02-30/06/02
27616	10-Jul-02	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY	$57,415.23	BCITF LEVY FOR MONTH OF JUNE 2002
27617	10-Jul-02	BUILDERS REGISTRATION BOARD	$11,539.50	BUILDERS DISPUTE FEES FOR THE MONTH JUNE 2002
27618	10-Jul-02	BEST LOOK PAINTING & DECORATING CONTRACTORS	$1,438.00	PAINTING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
27619	10-Jul-02	BALCATTA BITUMEN PAVING	$4,724.50	BITUMEN LAYING WITHIN VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27620	10-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	$913.90	CONT TOWARDS SALARY FOR ENVIRON OFFICER, YELLAGONGA PRJOECT (10 TO 21/06/02)
27621	10-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP PLANT HIRE	$724.60	REWIRE FLOODLIGHTS AT BUTTERWORTH PARK
27622	10-Jul-02	CABCHARGE	$9.50	COMMUNITY SERVICES
27623	10-Jul-02	FARLEY CAMPBELL	$70.00	VOLUNTEER FOR COMMUNITY BUSES
27624	10-Jul-02	CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD	$2,019.07	VEHICLE HIRE FOR POLICY & PLANNING, SAFER CITIZENS, BUILDING & FLEET & PARKS
27625	10-Jul-02	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	$378.00	BEING PAYROLL DED F/E 5/7/02
27626	10-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	$179.62	HIRE OF PLATE COMPACTOR TO COMPRESS LIMESTONE VERGE AT 57 SHEPPARD WAY
			$76.62	FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY INFRINGEMENTS – JUNE 2002
27627	10-Jul-02	CATHEDRAL OFFICE PRODUCTS	$279.40	MOBILE WHITEBOARD FOR ALEXANDER HEIGHTS DAY CENTRE
27628	10-Jul-02	CMP COMMUNICATIONS	$169.18	REPLACE REMOTE HEAD CABLE, TAIT RADIO 95229 REPLACE ANTENNA TWO WAY RADIO 95226
27629	10-Jul-02	DEPT OF TRANSPORT	$258.95	LICENCE FEE - 1/7/2 TO 30/6/3 - LEASED VEHICLE 1APX869
27630	10-Jul-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF-CARRAMAR	$19,674.90	COMMISION FEES FOR JUNE 2002
27631	10-Jul-02	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$220.00	UV INT VALS N/R MET RU LAND SHAR
27632	10-Jul-02	DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS	$322.27	REPAIRS TO RADIO EQUIPMENT - PLANT OPERATING COST FLEET MAINTENANCE
27633	10-Jul-02	DMD SHELVING SYSTEMS	$4,647.50	SUPPLY & INSTALL SHELVING AND COMPACTUS AT THE WANNEROO CIVIC CTR
27634	10-Jul-02	ELECTRIC STOVEMAN	$127.05	REPAIR URN TAP ASSEMBLY - WANNEROO SHOWGROUND
27635	10-Jul-02	EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY	$5,494.50	RESEARCH INTO HOME BASED BUSINESSES IN THE COASTAL & HESTER WARDS FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
27636	10-Jul-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$134.00	PETTY CASH TROPHY
27637	10-Jul-02	FINANCIAL COUNSELLORS ASSOC WA	$100.00	MEMBERSHIP FEES - FINANCIAL COUNSELLOR FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
27638	10-Jul-02	STEPHEN FREEBORN	$168.90	VOLUNTARY SERVICES
27639	10-Jul-02	FOCUS ON ACTIVITY	$111.00	SUBSCRIPTION LORNA GRAHAM FOCUS ON ACTIVITY & FOCUS ON MENTAL STIMULATION
27640	10-Jul-02	MAUREEN GRIERSON	$97.40	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE 200 KMS @ .487 CENTS
27641	10-Jul-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$5,996.05	RECREATIONAL CARE - ABORIGINAL PROGRAM RECREATIONAL CARE – ALEXANDER HEIGHTS HACC AND CACP CLIENT SERVICES
27642	10-Jul-02	JOHNDEC ENGINEERING PLASTICS PTY LTD	$93.50	REPAIR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
27643	10-Jul-02	LOVEGROVE TURF SERVICES PTY LTD	$14,594.80	TREE PLANTING AND LANDSCAPING AT CAFAGGIO CRES & SENARIO DR
27644	10-Jul-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	$8.75	COURIER CHARGES
27645	10-Jul-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	$22.82	COURIER CHARGES
27646	10-Jul-02	MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL	$1,129.54	BEING PAYROLL DED F/E 5/07/02
27647	10-Jul-02	MERCURY HACC AND CACP CLIENT SERVICES FIRE SAFETY	$1,090.80	INSPECTION & TESTING OF THE ESSENTIAL FIRE SERVICE FOR JUNE 2002
27648	10-Jul-02	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$14.52	COURIER CHARGES
27649	10-Jul-02	NON-ORGANIC DISPOSALS	$99.00	GLASS DISPOSAL
27650	10-Jul-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	$374.00	LABOUR MATERIALS WORK ORDER 53110
27651	10-Jul-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$33.65	PETTY CASH
27652	10-Jul-02	QUALITY PRESS	$1,489.40	RECYCLING CALENDAR CARDS - REPRINT FOR EWS
27653	10-Jul-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	$511.50	FMC SETS SEGMENTS FOR PLANT REPAIR
27654	10-Jul-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$100.00	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
27655	10-Jul-02	VACTOR JET RODDING	$605.00	HIRE OF VACTOR JET RODDING MACHINE
27656	10-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$8,242.00	MP027853 STREET LIGHTING JEFFERSON DRIVE, MARANGAROO
27657	10-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$150.00	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
27658	10-Jul-02	WANNEROO DRY CLEANERS	$23.00	DRYCLEANING FIREMEN'S UNIFORMS
27659	10-Jul-02	WANNEROO COFFEE LOUNGE	$78.00	LUNCH FOR INDUCTION OF 12 SAFETY OFFICERS
27660	10-Jul-02	WORM AFFAIR	$211.20	ONE RELN WORM FACTORY
27661	10-Jul-02	WESTCARE CENTRAL SAFETY	$23.54	STAFF CLOTHING
27662	10-Jul-02	B WESTON	$60.00	CLEANING OF HALL/ 28 DENSTEN WAY
27663	11-Jul-02	D G CONSULTING	$2,926.00	ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH WORK
27664	25-Jul-02	WA PAINT CITY	$1,757.70	SUPPLY OF PAINT FOR CITY'S GRAFFITI PROGRAM
27665	25-Jul-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS ARMAGUARD	$907.80	CASH COLLECTION FROM AQUAMOTION
27666	25-Jul-02	ASPHALTECH PTY LTD	$85,140.22	SUPPLY & LAY 14MM AND 10MM GRANITE MIX AT RANGEVIEW RD LANDSDALE AND FRANKLIN RD WANNEROO
27667	25-Jul-02	ARTEIL WA PTY LTD	$132.00	REPAIRS CHAIRS FIT NEW GASLIFTS
27668	25-Jul-02	AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L	$15,506.21	AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES AND REPAIRS AT VARIOUS COW BUILDINGS
27669	25-Jul-02	ADASOUND	$253.00	REPAIR TO ANTENNA & MICROPHONE CONNECTORS
27670	25-Jul-02	AUSSIE IT	$302.94	KYOCERA TONER
27671	25-Jul-02	ASKWITH COMPANY P/L	$275.00	REPAIR MICRO CABINET & REPLACE HANDLE
27672	25-Jul-02	ALLTECH INDUSTRIES AUSTRALIA	$44.00	REPAIR & TEST PAGER
27673	25-Jul-02	ASB MARKETING	$783.20	LASER ENGRAVED TRAVEL MUGS - MARKETING
27674	25-Jul-02	ADVANCED CONTINOUS KERBING	$130.00	KERBING COMPLETED AT 17 CAMBRIAN MALL ALEX HGHTS
27675	25-Jul-02	B G C CONCRETE	$348.94	CONCRETE FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27676	25-Jul-02	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$2,287.53	REPAIRS AND MUSTANG HIRE FOR WORKSHOP
27677	25-Jul-02	BASSENDEAN VILLAGE PHOTOGRAPHICS	$144.00	COPYING OF BLACK & WHITE PHOTOS – LIBRARY SERVICES
27678	25-Jul-02	CASTROL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$310.48	APX T GREASE 450GM DEPOT STORE STOCK
27679	25-Jul-02	C J D EQUIPMENT P/L	$227.01	STEERING COLUMN 98101 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
27680	25-Jul-02	CENTAMAN SYSTEMS PTY LTD	$282.00	CENTAMAN RECEIPT PRINTER RIBBONS
27681	25-Jul-02	DBS FENCING	$1,884.30	SUPPLY & INSTALL HANDRAILS AND FENCING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27682	25-Jul-02	DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD	$1,760.99	SUPPLY COW SIGNS AND ACCESSORIES FOR TECH SERVICES
27683	25-Jul-02	E R S AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$376.20	OIL FILTERS & ENV LEVY – WORKSHOP SERVICE PARTS WASHER - WORKSHOP
27684	25-Jul-02	ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD	$800.80	WASTE TYRE DISPOSAL SERVICE
27685	25-Jul-02	FAL FOOD SERVICES	$335.82	ASSORTED BISCUITS / NUTS – MARKETING SERVICES
27686	25-Jul-02	FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$8,517.80	CHARGE FOR SUPPORT SERVICE - COPYING CHARGES
27687	25-Jul-02	GEOFF'S TREE SERVICE	$6,972.63	TREE PRUNING AND STUMP REMOVAL FOR THE CITY OF WANNEROO
27688	25-Jul-02	GLAZEWELL P/L	$972.50	REPLACE BROKEN GLASS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27689	25-Jul-02	MGE UPS SYSTEMS AUST P/L	$7,830.90	3 YEAR CHARGE FOR UPS MAINTENANCE
27690	25-Jul-02	HUMES CONCRETE	$2,128.51	300MM CLASS 4 CONCRETE PIPES - DELIVER TO CNR MARANGAROO DR / WANNEROO RD AND FRANKLIN RD. WANNEROO
27691	25-Jul-02	HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY (AUST) P/L	$2,152.24	STOCK AND NON-STOCK VEHICLE FILTERS FOR THE DEPOT STORE
27692	25-Jul-02	JOONDALUP INDUSTRIAL HEALTH	$444.40	PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICALS X 3 PRE-EMPLOYMENT MED. AND FULL SCREENING FOR DAVID BUNCE & TROY HOWLETT
27693	25-Jul-02	J DIMOND CARPENTRY & FIXING	$220.00	REMOVE TIMBER FENCE & LIMESTONE PIER TO LEAVE WALKWAY OPEN - CLARKSON
27694	25-Jul-02	KERB QIC & CO	$19,004.02	KERBING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF WANNEROO
27695	25-Jul-02	KD INSTRUMENTS	$396.00	TYRE PRESSURE INDICATORS
27696	25-Jul-02	LELY WEST VERMEER	$500.29	MAGNETIC PICKUP SENSOR FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SET OF CUTTING BLADES 98067
27697	25-Jul-02	METRO BRICK	$898.41	DELIVERY OF PAVERS TO RANGEVIEW RD LANDSDALE
27698	25-Jul-02	MAYDAY EARTHMOVING	$1,746.25	HIRE OF MINI EXCAVATOR ON 3 SEPARATE OCCASIONS
27699	25-Jul-02	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	$46,189.29	TAMALA PARK WASTE - GENERAL, GREEN, DOMESTIC AND BULK
27700	25-Jul-02	MIKE GEARY SIGNS	$748.00	SUPPLY SIGNS FOR QUINNS BEACH BOAT RAMP
			$352.00	SUPPLY DRAFT PLAN SIGNS FOR GNANGARA LAKE
27701	25-Jul-02	MOORE BUSINESS SYSTEMS	$2,398.00	SWIFT MAILER PAPER P/SEAL GENERIC - LIBRARY SERVICES
27702	25-Jul-02	MUSTANG PRINT & COPY	$40.80	LAMINATING OF MAPS FOR RANGER SERVICES
27703	25-Jul-02	MONTY'S AUTOCOLOUR	$196.20	PAINT FOR URBAN ART WORKSHOP AT CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE OPEN DAY
27704	25-Jul-02	NIX SHEET METAL ENGINEERING	$330.00	2 FABRICATE 3MM M/S PRESSING SPECIFIED JN8141
27705	25-Jul-02	ORANGE	$5,282.60	ORANGE PAGING SUMMARY ORANGE CDMA MOBILE ACCOUNT
27706	25-Jul-02	PETER WOOD PTY LTD	$6,708.90	TREE BOLLARDS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27707	25-Jul-02	PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD	$1,715.31	SAFETY EQUIP FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
27708	25-Jul-02	PRESTIGE ALARMS	$9,025.83	RE-PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING OF ALARM SYSTEMS
27709	25-Jul-02	THE PRINTING FACTORY	$641.83	250 BUSINESS CARDS FOR Z NEDELJKOVIC, C WILLIAMS CERTIFICATES FOR AQUAMOTION
27710	25-Jul-02	PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY LTD	$4,598.00	HIRE OF PROFILER, SWEEPER, TIPPER - FRANKLIN & BELGRADE WANNEROO
27711	25-Jul-02	PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL	$102.74	STAFF CLOTHING
27712	25-Jul-02	PABX SERVICE GROUP	$616.00	PROVIDE EMERGENCY MESSAGE PROGRAMMING FOR ALTERNATIVE NIGHT ARRANGEMENT
27713	25-Jul-02	PRO-MA SYSTEMS	$469.70	8009 MBL 450 GREASE CARTRIDGES
27714	25-Jul-02	ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS	$3,399.19	FILLING SAND FOR VARIOUS CITY OF WANNEROO LOCATIONS
27715	25-Jul-02	RAINWEST ROOFINGS PTY LTD	$154.00	SUPPLY & FIT COLOURBOND DOWNPIPE TO REAR OF HOUSE AT FRONT OF COUNCIL DEPOT
27716	25-Jul-02	RED HOT PARCEL TAXI	$245.90	COURIER CHARGES
27717	25-Jul-02	STATEWIDE OFFICE SUPPLIES	$7.05	SYSTEM BOARD A4
27718	25-Jul-02	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	$16,057.09	PURCHASE FOR THE MONTH MAY 2002
27719	25-Jul-02	STOPMASTER BRAKES	$2,014.10	VEH. 96697 96708 95777 96705 FRONT/REAR RELINE BRAKE SHOES
27720	25-Jul-02	SUN CITY PUBLISHING	$40.00	ONE MONTHS ADVERTISING - JUNE 2002
27721	25-Jul-02	SOUNDWAVE DISTRIBUTORS	$1,215.40	SELECTED MUSIC CD'S FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
27722	25-Jul-02	STRAWBERRY FIELDS TEA ROOMS	$35.00	JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE - COFFEE MORNING
27723	25-Jul-02	SNAP TEX	$440.00	REPAIR, SUPPLY NEW ITEMS AS REQUIRED AND FIX PIN-UP BOARD TO WALL OF NEW MEETING ROOM ON GROUND FLOOR OF CIVIC CENTRE OFFICES
27724	25-Jul-02	TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD	$182.20	6" RUBBER WHEEL & TOP WINDING HANDLE BRAKE MOUNT PLATE, HUBDRUM, BRAKE-PLATE
27725	25-Jul-02	3D NETWORKS	$3,227.26	MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 5033
27726	25-Jul-02	TURF TEC AUSTRALIA	$235.40	SHARPEN CUTTING CYLINDER AND BOTTOM BLADE
27727	25-Jul-02	TOTAL TORO	$1,430.35	VEHICLE SPARE PARTS - MOWER WORKSHOP
27728	25-Jul-02	VIBRA INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION AUST	$67.76	AIR FILTER CLEANING - DEPOT STORE STOCK
27729	25-Jul-02	PAUL VARLEY	$350.00	CASUAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT UPGRADE
27730	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO HARDWARE	$35.20	SHARPENING TOOLS
27731	25-Jul-02	WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$1,114.15	EQUIPMENT RENTAL CATERPILLAR
27732	25-Jul-02	WEMBLEY CEMENT INDUSTRIES	$5,060.06	VARIOUS CONCRETE ITEMS
27733	25-Jul-02	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	$875.60	NORTH METRO COMMUNITY ONLINE ASSOC LEASE SALVATION ARMY - LEASE - MERRIWA ADMIN CENTRE
27734	25-Jul-02	W A LIMESTONE CO	$458.60	75MM LIMESTONE
27735	25-Jul-02	WESTERN RE-SPOTTING SERVICES	$2,417.80	LINEMARKING, TRAFFIC CONTROL, INSTALL DISABLED BAYS
27736	25-Jul-02	WALKERDEN GOLF AUSTRALIA	$888.80	ECONOMY SAFARI STRAW. CLOTH LINING FOR MARKETING
27737	25-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN TURF INDUSTRIES	$37,140.59	MAINTENANCE WORKS AT MARANGAROO & CARRAMAR GOLF COURSES - MAY 2002
27738	25-Jul-02	ALINE BRICK PAVING	$24,486.00	LAYING OF PAVERS AND LANDSCAPING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27739	25-Jul-02	CLEAN SWEEP	$4,955.50	ROAD SWEEPER HIRE FOR VARIOUS CITY OF WANNEROO LOCATIONS
27740	25-Jul-02	COMTEK PTY LTD	$107.80	CD-ROM DRIVE, FLOPPY DISC DRIVE FOR IS
27741	25-Jul-02	CORETEL COMMUNICATION PTY LTD	$7,227.00	CONSULTING RICHARD DALE CREDIT INV I123400 CONSULTING-RICHARD DALE.RECONFIGURE CISCO TO ALLOW TIME UDP RENTAL OF MICROWAVE EQUIPMENT FOR 01/06/02 TO 30/06/02 ADDITIONAL DOWNLOADS & INTERNET ACCESS FOR FEB, MAR, APR & MAY 2002
27742	25-Jul-02	DICK SMITH ELECTRONICS	$290.70	PERSONAL ALARM FOR VARIOUS COMMUNITY GROUPS AND CENTRES (LEISURE SERVICES) UNIDEN XSA650 CORDLESS TAM - LIRBRARY SERVICES (MUSEUMS)
27743	25-Jul-02	GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA	$2,013.00	CANCELLED - 2 AUGUST 2002
27744	25-Jul-02	GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA	$9,033.13	REMOVAL OF GRAFFITI AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27745	25-Jul-02	HOME CHEF	$4,615.54	HOME CHEF DINNERS FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS
27746	25-Jul-02	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	$26,567.51	CONTRACT STAFF VARIOUS
27747	25-Jul-02	REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES	$34,611.57	CLEANING AT VARIOUS CITY OF WANNEROO BUILDINGS
27748	25-Jul-02	RECYCLING CO OF WA PTY LTD	$3,300.00	CHRG FOR USING WOOL BALES TO BOTH SORT INTO & STORE 17/04/02 TO 1/05/02
27749	25-Jul-02	STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS	$56,251.80	HIRE OF VARIOUS TRUCKS, LOADERS, TIPPER, BOBCAT/FORKS
27750	25-Jul-02	SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD	$5,225.00	PODIATRY SERVICES
27751	25-Jul-02	STIRLING CONCRETE PTY LTD	$49,602.15	INSTALL FOOTPATHS AND PRAM RAMPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27752	25-Jul-02	TURBOMASTER PUMPS	$11,389.40	SERVICE PUMP & REPLACE COLUMN JAMES SPIERS PARK AND NEVILLE PARK
27753	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27754	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO PLUMBING	$13,322.23	PLUMBING MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AT VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY
27755	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27756	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27757	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	$29,880.88	ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/ MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AT VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY
27758	17-Jul-02	IP AUSTRALIA	$905.00	APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TRADEMARK NO. 824908
27759	17-Jul-02	ROBERT TAYLOR	$91.66	KEYHOLDER FOR THE WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER FOR WANNEROO SHOWGROUNDS
27760	17-Jul-02	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	$280.52	HOME CARE SERVICES FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS
27761	17-Jul-02	AMCON SOLUTIONS PTY LTD	$2,882.00	CONSULTANCY WORK FOR INFORMATION SERVICES
27762	17-Jul-02	BRANCHES EVERYWHERE	$110.00	WORK AS INSTRUCTED BY LORNA GRAHAM - HACC SERVICES
27763	17-Jul-02	DEWSONS MERRIWA	$292.89	SUNDRY ITEMS FOR CHILDREN'S (NORTH) ACTIVITY PROGRAMS & CONSUMABLE & STORAGE EQUIPMENT FOR FAMILY DAY CARE PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
27764	17-Jul-02	DEPARTMENT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$22.00	2 X GOLA FOR SURVEY SERVICES
27765	17-Jul-02	LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE OF WA	$814.90	LIBRARY BOOKS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
27766	17-Jul-02	K MART JOONDALUP	$287.94	DINNER SETS FOR QUINNS ROCKS DAY CENTRE
27767	17-Jul-02	BUSH FIRE BRIGADE	$312.87	CATERING FOR BRIGADE EXERCISE AT BARBAGELLO RACEWAY ON SUNDAY 29/06/02
27768	17-Jul-02	MARGARET GILCHRIST	$41.66	KEYHOLDER FOR YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS
27769	17-Jul-02	EVAN MARTIN	$83.32	KEYHOLDER FOR HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE, ALEXANDER HEIGHTS, JOHN MOLONEY CLUBROOMS & KOONDOOLA COMMUNITY HALLS
27770	17-Jul-02	DRIVESHAFT BALANCING SERVICES	$380.00	REPAIR DRIVESHAFT
27771	17-Jul-02	FASTWAY COURIERS (WA)	$198.00	PACKAGES FOR COURIER SERVICES FOR PODIATRY CLINICS
27772	17-Jul-02	LADYBIRD'S PLANT HIRE	$85.80	RENTAL OF INDOOR PLANTS FOR JUNE 2002
27773	17-Jul-02	SOUTH WEST TOURING CAR CLUB	$390.00	SIX ENTRY FEES FOR THE AUTOCROSS STATE ROUND HELD AT SANDALWOOD PK BENGER 23/06/02 - YOUTH SERVICES RALLY TEAM
27774	17-Jul-02	ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES	$916.30	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
27775	17-Jul-02	LEE TAN	$41.66	KEYHOLDER FOR PERIDOT PARK & BANKSIA GROVE ZONE
27776	17-Jul-02	LUZIA JOHNSTONE	$41.66	KEYHOLDER FOR CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE & ANTHONY WARING CLUBROOMS & PARK
27777	17-Jul-02	JENNY GILBERT	$100.00	TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER FOR KOONDOOLA PARK TENNIS COURT & MONTROSE PARK TENNIS COURT
27778	17-Jul-02	STEVE BARBARICH	$41.66	KEYHOLDER FOR WARRADALE COMMUNITY HALL
27779	17-Jul-02	GRAHAME GIBSON	$317.90	MENS HEALTH PROGRAM AND FREIGHT - BOOK PURCHASE FOR YANCHEP COMM CTR
27780	17-Jul-02	LUCY BURLING	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27781	17-Jul-02	JUDITH SALISBURY	$7.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27782	17-Jul-02	NORMAN COURT	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27783	17-Jul-02	SIMON CLARK	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
27784	17-Jul-02	DANIEL AND AMANDA HEEREY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27785	17-Jul-02	SHANE ROBERT LOTHIAN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27786	17-Jul-02	ARIE AND KRISTINA LEMSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27787	17-Jul-02	TANYA A PASTONJICKI	$258.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27788	17-Jul-02	LISA AND GREGORY CORNELIUS	$325.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27789	17-Jul-02	NAOMI SMITH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27790	17-Jul-02	MARILYN & M FREEMAN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27791	17-Jul-02	JOSEPHINE A RONCO	$265.82	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27792	17-Jul-02	DAVID ALAN PAYNE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
27793	17-Jul-02	AISAT INSTRUMENTS PTY LTD	$90.17	REPAIR SPEEDO CABLE VEHICLE REPAIRS
27794	17-Jul-02	COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS	$5,056.21	ADVERTISING FOR MAY 2002
27795	17-Jul-02	CHAMPION COMPRESSED AIR	$2,576.20	MICRO FILTER & REFRIGERATED DRYER
27796	17-Jul-02	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	$9,662.04	PURCHASE OF STATIONERY - MONTH OF JUNE 2002
27797	17-Jul-02	EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	$59,044.09	LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET LEASE FOR JULY 2002
27798	17-Jul-02	GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$11,979.00	SCOTTS SPORTSMASTER 25KG BAGS (FERTILISER) - PARKS MAINTENANCE
27799	17-Jul-02	MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS	$100.00	HIPHOP CLASS G/WHEEN HIGH SCHOOL
27800	17-Jul-02	YANCHEP SERVICE STATION	$164.00	FUEL FOR FUEL PUMP 5 - PARKS MAINTENANCE ON ROAD COSTS
27801	17-Jul-02	LYN VERGUNST	$91.66	KEY HOLDER FOR NORTH WARD ZONE TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER FOR GUMBLOSSOM COURTS
27802	17-Jul-02	DEANNE HETHERINGTON	$91.66	KEYHOLDER FOR GIRRAWHEEN SCOUT & GUIDE HALL & HUDSON PARK CLUBROOMS TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER FOR HUDSON PARK COURTS
27803	17-Jul-02	JOE ARRIGO	$91.66	KEYHOLDER FOR WANNEROO SENIOR CITIZENS TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER FOR ELLIOT ROAD COURTS
27804	17-Jul-02	ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD	$660.00	GENERAL CONSTRUCTION - 19 MILE - QUINNS ROCK, RIDGEWOOD, CARABOODA
27805	17-Jul-02	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$457.20	STANDING ORDER FOR MILK ALL STAFF
27806	17-Jul-02	ALINTA GAS	$10,106.47	GAS SUPPLY FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27807	17-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$96.30	PETTY CASH
27808	17-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$28.30	PETTY CASH
27809	17-Jul-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
27810	17-Jul-02	BELL HEALTH	$615.57	RESPITE CARE FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS
27811	17-Jul-02	BANKWEST CONVEYANCING	$297.03	RATES PAID TWICE - P/N 198169
27812	17-Jul-02	BELRIDGE BUS CHARTER	$275.00	YTH SERVICES TRANSPORT - TWO ROCKS TO SIZZLER BELDON & RETURN
27813	17-Jul-02	ALAN BLENCOWE	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
27814	17-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27815	17-Jul-02	COURIER AUSTRALIA	$282.27	COURIER CHARGES
27816	17-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	$2,222.00	RECOVERY OF COMMUNICATION COSTS TWO WAY RADIO LICENCES 20/12/02 TO 21/12/03
27817	17-Jul-02	CAPE DEMOLITION	$30.00	WORKS AT BUTTERWORTH PARK - BUILDING MAINTENANCE
27818	17-Jul-02	CABCHARGE	$266.34	TAXI SERVICES
27819	17-Jul-02	FRANK CVITAN	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
27820	17-Jul-02	DEPT OF TRANSPORT	$232.40	THIRD PARTY INSURANCE
27821	17-Jul-02	DENSFORD PTY LTD	$82,159.91	PAYMENT CERTICATE NO 3 PROJECT NO 2171 CONTRACT NO.02230
27822	17-Jul-02	DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS	$47.52	4 X LOW BAND TAPERED WHIP (AERIAL) FOR RANGER SERVICES
27823	17-Jul-02	DEWSONS WANNEROO	$90.18	FOOD & SUPPLIES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - COMMUNITY SERVICES
27824	17-Jul-02	ELECTRIC STOVEMAN	$156.26	BIRCO URN ELEMENT
27825	17-Jul-02	ELECTROQUIP (WA) PTY LTD	$308.00	TO CHECK AND REPAIR ARROW LIGHTS CONTROLLER & MISC PARTS
27826	17-Jul-02	FROGMAT ENVIRONMENTAL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD	$3,580.01	8 ROLLS OF 900MM ROOT BARRIER @ $400.00 + DELIVERY
27827	17-Jul-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$14,892.51	PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS
27828	17-Jul-02	HOME SATELINTE & VIDEO SYSTEM	$88.00	4 WAY MULTITRAP - CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE
27829	17-Jul-02	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	$1,903.00	WORK AT MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE
27830	17-Jul-02	IDG COMMUNICATIONS	$59.40	PC WORLD SUBSCRIPTION - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
27831	17-Jul-02	K & F CONCRETE	$264.00	RELAY PAVERS & RIDGEWOOD PK VANDLES
27832	17-Jul-02	KERBING WEST	$950.40	72 METRES OF MRWA SEMI MOUNTABLE KERBING
27833	17-Jul-02	M LAVAN	$1,500.00	SUBSIDY FOR AQUAMOTION CRECHE OPERATION
27834	17-Jul-02	MUNICIPAL WORKCARE	$292,500.00	CONTRIBUTION FOR PERIOD 30/06/02-30/06/03
27835	17-Jul-02	MASTER CRAFT PROFESSIONAL PAINTING & DECORATING	$1,980.00	KINGSWAY LADIES & GENTS & KOONDOOLA PARK LADIES & GENTS
27836	17-Jul-02	MERCURY FIRE SAFETY	$852.50	ATTEND SITE TO CHANGE SMOKE DETECTOR TO THERMAL ATTEND SITE, DCP FIRE EXTINGUISHER REFILL & PRESSURE TEST ATTEND SITE, TEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER & PRESSURE TEST
27837	17-Jul-02	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$99.94	COURIER CHARGES
27838	17-Jul-02	DOROTHY NEWTON	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
27839	17-Jul-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	$2,552.00	CONTRACT WORK FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP
27840	17-Jul-02	NORMAN DENNIS	$41.66	KEYHOLDER FOR JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE
27841	17-Jul-02	PERTH HOME CARE	$165.00	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
27842	17-Jul-02	PARK PLAY LANDSCAPE	$7,447.00	SUPPLY & INSTALL LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL
27843	17-Jul-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$46.55	PETTY CASH
27844	17-Jul-02	RETRAVISION	$131.82	CD RADIO CASSETTE COMPACT S/CFDV7 - HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE
27845	17-Jul-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	$471.62	ASPHALT RAKES WITH HANDLES AND FMC BROOM SEGMENTS
27846	17-Jul-02	ST JOHN AMBULANCE OF AUSTRALIA	$71.96	SHIELD FACE MOUTH TO MOUTH RESUSCITATION
27847	17-Jul-02	SAM SALPIETRO	$1,125.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
27848	17-Jul-02	STATEWIDE INSURANCE BROKERS PTY LTD	$1,815.00	PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR M LAVAN T/A AQUAMOTION CRECHE FOR PERIOD 23/07/02-23/07/03 POLICY NO 70A218812BPK
27849	17-Jul-02	STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS	$296.01	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
27850	17-Jul-02	TARGET	$192.26	KITCHEN EQUIPMENT FOR AGED DAY CARE SERVICES - ALEXANDER HEIGHTS
27851	17-Jul-02	TECH FAB	$9,416.00	SUPPLY & INSTALL 2 X VIEWING PLATFORMS - MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE
27852	17-Jul-02	WATER CORPORATION	$38,088.80	ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGES FOR VARIOUS FACILITIES
27853	17-Jul-02	WESTERN LAMINATORS	$61.60	LAMINATING MAPS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
27854	17-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$19,156.60	POWER USAGE AT VARIOUS FACILITIES
27855	17-Jul-02	WINTERGREENE DRILLING	$6,600.00	REDEVELOP BORES AT NEVILLE, JAMES SPIERS, WARRANDITE NORTH, WARRANDITE SOUTH, COVER WOOD RESERVES & KINGSWAY BRITISH SOCCER
27856	17-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27857	17-Jul-02	W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC.	$14,286.04	JUNE MARKETFORCE ADVERTISING
27858	18-Jul-02	JOONDALUP COURT	$839.60	10 WARRANTS
27859	25-Jul-02	AUTO CONTROL DOORS	$278.30	DOOR PANEL RE SECURING
27860	25-Jul-02	ACTIMED AUSTRALIA	$212.74	CONSUMABLES FOR THE PODIATRY SERVICES
27861	25-Jul-02	ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT	$14,761.64	CONTROLLERS, SIGNS AND CONES FOR ROAD WORKS AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS
27862	25-Jul-02	ADELPHI TAILORING CO	$360.00	2 X TROUSERS FOR MR BEGG 2 X TROUSERS FOR MR
27863	25-Jul-02	ALL FOREIGN LANGUAGE BOOKSHOP	$644.64	VARIOUS CDRS FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
27864	25-Jul-02	AUTO DOOR SYSTEMS	$984.41	ANSWER SERVICE WANNEROO REFUSE SITE
27865	25-Jul-02	AGPARTS WAREHOUSE	$186.67	FORTRON BRAKE CLEANER
27866	25-Jul-02	A CLASS LINEMARKING SERVICE	$1,155.00	LINEMARKING AT CITY OF WANNEROO LOCATIONS
27867	25-Jul-02	ALZHEIMERS ASSOCN WA	$231.00	DEMENTIA CARE TRAINING WORKSHOPS - LIZ LEE, JACKIE HIGGINS
27868	25-Jul-02	ALLIED FORKLIFTS	$320.35	HIRE CHARGES FORKLIFT
27869	25-Jul-02	BUDGET RENT A CAR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$1,225.02	COROLLA 1AUT595 - RANGER SERVICES COROLLA 1AYY010 - RANGER SERVICES HILUX 116273 116273 115463 - TECHNICAL SERVICES
27870	25-Jul-02	BUCKLEYS WASTE DISPOSAL	$1,569.26	WASTE EFFLUENT REMOVAL
27871	25-Jul-02	BGC BLOKPAVE	$3,265.99	VARIOUS PAVERS
27872	25-Jul-02	BILLY'S SERVICES	$16,503.30	KOONDOOLA & BURBRIDGE WAY - NEW DRAIN WORKS
27873	25-Jul-02	BRIAN PAINE & ASSOCIATES	$1,457.50	BUILDING 1308,1291 ADJUST AUTOCAD DRAWING TO REFLECT CURRENT BUILDING LAYOUT
27874	25-Jul-02	B & E FIRE	$143.55	SERVICE &INSPECT FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
27875	25-Jul-02	CURTAIN MAN	$1,190.75	CURTAINS & INSTALLATION - GUMBLOSSOM COMM CTR
27876	25-Jul-02	CLASSIC BOOKBINDERS PTY LTD	$264.00	MINUTES BOUND BALADEK
27877	25-Jul-02	CASEWEST PTY LTD	$500.90	SPARE PARTS FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - 98833
27878	25-Jul-02	DYMOCKS WHITFORDS	$249.09	BOOKS FOR MOBILE LIBRARY
27879	25-Jul-02	DYMOCKS WARWICK	$45.78	LIBRARY BOOKS FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
27880	25-Jul-02	BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS	$92.45	LIBRARY BOOKS
27881	25-Jul-02	DELTALINE SECURITY	$578.60	STATIC GUARDS 4.5HRS SECURITY SERVICES FOR HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTRE
27882	25-Jul-02	GREENWOOD PARTY HIRE	$1,049.95	MINDARIE HIRED OF CHAIRS & MARQUEE FOR 14/04/02 KOONDOOLA PK HIRE OF CHAIRS AND MARQUEE FOR 30/03/02
27883	25-Jul-02	GYMCARE	$134.14	CALL OUT 9015 CRANK TO SUIT SCHWHINN - PLANT & EQUIP MAINTENANCE AT AQUAMOTION
27884	25-Jul-02	GREEN & GOLD HIAB SERVICES	$1,141.25	HIRE OF HIABL CRANE FOR VARIOUS JOBS
27885	25-Jul-02	C & E M HARMER	$136.37	NEWSPAPER SUPPLY
27886	25-Jul-02	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	$5,607.93	METER READING FOR CITY OF WANNEROO PHOTOCOPIERS
27887	25-Jul-02	INDUSTRIAL POWER AND ELECTRONICS	$1,750.10	SUPPLY 1 ONLY VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE FOR EWS PURCHASE 4 KW TOSHIBA VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE FOR EWS
27888	25-Jul-02	JOONDALUP CITY ROOFING	$129.80	REPAIRS TO ROOF AT KINGSWAY BADMINTON COURTS
27889	25-Jul-02	JMAC INDUSTRIES	$264.00	CLEANING RAG MIX COTTON DEPOT STORE STOCK
27890	25-Jul-02	JUDIUS PTY LTD	$3,033.55	CRAFT ITEMS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS
27891	25-Jul-02	KILLARNEY TRADING	$9,823.00	REFURBISH HYDRA-PAC PLASTIC BALLER MACHINE FOR ROB ELLIOT EWS
27892	25-Jul-02	LYONS & PEIRCE	$352.00	HIRE WATER TRUCK - JET BLOCKED STORM WATER LINE
27893	25-Jul-02	MILLAR & ASSOCIATES	$1,859.00	ROAD SAFETY REVIEW OF GIRRAWHEEN AVENUE
27894	25-Jul-02	MCLEOD & CO	$260.15	PROSECUTION - PART LOT 7 (154) FRANKLIN RD, JANDABUP - N & C POLITIS
27895	25-Jul-02	METAL ARTWORK CREATIONS	$143.30	NAME BADGES FOR COW EMPLOYEES
27896	25-Jul-02	MPL OCC & ENV SOLUTIONS	$8,844.00	ENV. INSPECTION OF FORMER WASH BAYS
				ASBESTOS ASSESSMENTS UNDERTAKES AS PER HSQ4123 DURING MAY 2002 AT VARIOUS CITY OF WANNEROO SITES
27897	25-Jul-02	PERTH EXPO HIRE	$5,269.93	HIRE VARIOUS DISPLAY WALLS, SPOTLIGHTS, PLINTHS, HANGING WIRES FOR ART EXHIBITION
27898	25-Jul-02	PERTH DOOR SERVICES	$3,553.00	SUPPLY & INSTALL TRAFFIC PRO UNIT TO SINGLE ENTRY DOOR
27899	25-Jul-02	PRODUCTIVE PLASTICS	$124.30	CONVEYOR REPAIRS FOR EWS
27900	25-Jul-02	PERTH CONCERT SOUND & VIDEO	$423.50	DUBBING 7HRS/7&HALF HRS VIDEOS BATTLE OF THE BANDS (LEISURE SERVICES)
27901	25-Jul-02	P P K ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE P/L	$6,952.00	INVESTIGATION OF LAKE JOONDALUP DRAINAGE UPGRADE OUTLETS 9 & 10
27902	25-Jul-02	PACIFIC ACCESS PTY LTD	$520.80	ADVERTISING YELLOW PAGES FOR AQUAMOTION
27903	25-Jul-02	QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES	$3,575.00	QEC RE-CERTIFICATION AUDIT
27904	25-Jul-02	M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD	$4,102.18	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE QUINNS BEACH COASTAL PROTECTION
27905	25-Jul-02	RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD	$6,633.11	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27906	25-Jul-02	A & J SALAMONE	$237.60	SUPPLY OF FILLING SAND FOR FRANKLN ROAD
27907	25-Jul-02	SCOTTS TRIMMING SERVICE	$770.00	REPAIR FOAM CODE & RECOVER DRIVERS SEAT CUSHION ON MOWERS AND TRUCKS
27908	25-Jul-02	SALMAT	$494.88	DATA CONVERSION & LASER PRINT
27909	25-Jul-02	SILVER CHAIN	$627.00	CARE AIDE MON-FRIDAY 26/6/02-28/6/02 PROVISION OF SERVICES TO CACP CLIENTS FOR PERIOD 01/01/02 – 30/06/02
27910	25-Jul-02	STEWART & HEATON CLOTHING CO PTY LTD	$39.60	FIRE FIGHTER CLOTH NAME BADGES
27911	25-Jul-02	SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD	$702.99	VARIOUS VEHICLE SPARE PARTS FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP
27912	25-Jul-02	SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD	$955.78	VARIOUS VEHICLE SPARE PARTS FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP
27913	25-Jul-02	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	$87,983.30	SHELLCARD- EASIFLEET VEHICLES SHELLCARD- WCC VEHICLES FUEL FOR THE PERIOD 1/06/02 TO 15/06/02
27914	25-Jul-02	RAY TILBROOK	$50.00	REPAIR TRACTOR STEERING WHEEL
27915	25-Jul-02	FORCORP PTY LTD	$858.00	REPAIR 240CFQ STROBE LIGHT 96697
27916	25-Jul-02	TELETRONICS	$44.44	PLANTRONICS HEADSET VOICE TUBES
27917	25-Jul-02	TEEN CHALLENGE FREEDOM AND SUCCESS	$100.00	JADE TALK ON DRUG AWARENESS
27918	25-Jul-02	URBAN DEVELOPMENT INST OF AUST	$1,698.00	MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FOR THE PERIOD 01/07/02 - 30/06/02 (PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT)
27919	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE	$8,691.65	METAL FABRICATION/REPAIR SERVICES TO THE CITY OF WANNEROO
27920	25-Jul-02	WANGARA CARPET COURT	$3,355.00	1 BOX GREY PVC CAPPING BUILDING MAIN. ALEXANDER HEIGHTS FLOTEX SHEET BUILDING MAIN. YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS REC CTR
27921	25-Jul-02	W A C O S S	$88.00	2 ROUND TABLE SEMINAR 1/7/02
27922	25-Jul-02	WORK CLOBBER	$97.00	SAFETY BOOTS - PARKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE
27923	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO FUEL INJECTION	$840.00	SERVICE INJECTORS, NEW NOZZLES, CUMMINS VEHICLE REPAIRS
27924	25-Jul-02	WALDRAM'S ROOF TILING	$137.50	FM 13198 HAINSWORTH PARK - TOILET BLOCK
27925	25-Jul-02	WOOLRIDGES	$249.35	BOOK PURCHASES - GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
27926	25-Jul-02	Y M C A OF PERTH	$15,072.75	YMCA BUS PROVIDED FOR CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE, YANCHEP YOUTH SERVICE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
27927	18-Jul-02	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$287.44	POUNDAGE/VISITS W/EX 958/2002
27928	25-Jul-02	ALLMARK & ASSOCIATES	$1,824.90	COLOP 55 SELF INKING DATER "SCANNED" 5000 FRIDGE MAGNETS SAFER CITIZENS
27929	25-Jul-02	ALUMAYNE PRODUCTS	$209.00	REPAIR DOOR AT OLDHAM PARK REPAIR CABINET AT CARRAMAR GOLF COURSE
27930	25-Jul-02	AARQUEanitech	$788.35	ROLLS OF BOND PAPER - 914MM x 50M - 2 INCH CORE TO SUIT HP 10055CM PLOTTER CARTRIDGES FOR HP PRINTER
27931	25-Jul-02	ALGAR BURNS PTY LTD	$9,334.07	SOFTWARE FOR IS
27932	25-Jul-02	AGENT SALES & SERVICES PTY LTD	$954.09	POOL CHEMICALS FOR AQUAMOTION
27933	25-Jul-02	ADFORM	$696.30	WHITE MAGNET FITTED TO SIGNS FESA HELMET STICKERS FIRE HELMET STICKERS (REFER M TERACI)
27934	25-Jul-02	AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD	$881.54	GAS CYLINDER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
27935	25-Jul-02	BOYA MARKET GARDEN EQUIPMENT	$135.63	MEDIUM GRADE GRINDING PASTE
27936	25-Jul-02	BUNZL LTD	$192.50	CHH TISSUE ACID FREE - LIBRARY SERVICES (MUSEUMS)
27937	25-Jul-02	BENARA NURSERIES	$325.88	PLANT/TREE - ANGOPHORA COSTATA
27938	25-Jul-02	BURGTEC AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD	$5,177.51	SUPPLY CHI CHAIRS WITH ARMS IN AMBER KB 156 FABRIC
27939	25-Jul-02	BIG ROCK TOYOTA/WILD WEST	$235.46	GRIP SUB-ASSY 69052 60140 DOOR LOCK GRIP SUB-ASSY & HAMMER EMERGENCY
27940	25-Jul-02	BUNNINGS LIMITED	$2,105.43	VARIOUS TOOLS, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES FOR BUILDING, FLEET MAINTENANCE
27941	25-Jul-02	BOOMA AUTO ELECTRICS	$768.90	A/C AND ALTERNATOR SERVICE/REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINT.
27942	25-Jul-02	BIG W	$573.81	Consumables and Storage Equipment for Family Day Care Program Activities
27943	25-Jul-02	BRING COURIERS	$68.46	COURIER CHARGES
27944	25-Jul-02	B S D CONSULTANTS	$6,099.50	Consultancy Services for the preparation of the City's Strategic Infrastructure Assets Management Plan
27945	25-Jul-02	BEAUREPAIRES	$34,025.60	TYRE FITTING SERVICE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27946	25-Jul-02	BYWEST PTY LTD	$1,473.12	MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27947	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27948	25-Jul-02	J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD	$166.87	GUN GREASE STG 2169 700 GRM/CARTRIDGE/FLEX NYLON
27949	25-Jul-02	BRAVO HIRE	$60.00	HIRE OF CHAINSAW ON FRANKLIN RD 25.6.02
27950	25-Jul-02	CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA	$1,250.70	VEHICLE BATTERIES FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE
27951	25-Jul-02	COVENTRYS	$2,920.29	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE
27952	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
27953	25-Jul-02	COVENTRYS	$1,532.55	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE
27954	25-Jul-02	COLES SUPERMARKETS AUST P/L	$98.05	SUGAR, BISCUITS, JELLY BEANS FOR QUINNS DAY CARE CENTRE
27955	25-Jul-02	COATES WRECKAIR	$871.58	HIRE OF COMPRESSOR PLUS JACKHAMMER CNR OF WANNEROO & MARANGAROO 26.6.02 WACKER DPU 6055 DIESEL PLATE COMPACTOR
27956	25-Jul-02	CHADSON ENGINEERING PTY LTD	$335.81	TWO TREAD STEPS – AQUAMOTION POOL TABLETS - AQUAMOTION
27957	25-Jul-02	CDM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$960.96	MITA P/COPIER TONER AND MAINT
27958	25-Jul-02	COLLINS CRAFT & SCHOOL SUPPLIES	$105.81	ACRYLIC POSTER PAINT 2 LT.FACE PAINT DERIVAN.PKT 10 CRAYONS.PAINT STAMPER - NAIDOC WEEK AT BANKSIA GROVE COMM CTR
27959	25-Jul-02	CARABOODA ROLL ON INSTANT LAWN	$1,634.50	ROLL ON LAWN FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS
27960	25-Jul-02	CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD	$157.00	FULLVUE FILE, PURPLE TINT F & S + DELIVERY - RECORDS
27961	25-Jul-02	CITY BUSINESS MACHINES	$1,149.30	HP BLACK CARTRIDGE HP C4890A NO 8 BLACK VALUE PACK FASTWAY DEL NEXT DAY LCD PROJECTOR LAMP
27962	25-Jul-02	DEPT OF CONSERVATION & LAND	$371.75	ELECTRICITY SUPPLIED TO GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM FOR 140 DAYS 9/01/02 TO 28/05/02
27963	25-Jul-02	DRIVE IN ELECTRICS	$2,968.60	VARIOUS ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27964	25-Jul-02	DIAMOND LOCK & KEY	$4,126.93	RE-KEYING AND KEY CUTTING SERVICES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE KEYS 140601 &110112
27965	25-Jul-02	JOSEPH DAHDAH & COMPANY	$186.66	STAFF CLOTHING
27966	25-Jul-02	EDUCATIONAL ART SUPPLIES CO	$801.43	MAGNETIC SHEET ADHESIVE/ GLUE EASI PASTE.PIPECLEANER GLITTER.CORRUGATED BOARD ROLL ASSTD COL - FAMILY DAY CARE PLAY GROUPS
27967	25-Jul-02	EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD	$190.00	COLOUR COPIES - CLARKSON YTH CTR OPEN DAY
27968	25-Jul-02	EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE PTY LTD	$2,106.83	TOYS AND EQUIPMENT FOR FAMILY DAY CARE TOY LIBRARY AND PLAY GROUPS
27969	25-Jul-02	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	$1,267.32	RETICULATION ITEMS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS
27970	25-Jul-02	FREEWAY SCREENS & WINDOWS	$2,959.00	SECURITY SCREENS FOR COMPUTER ROOM SUPPLY & FITTING OF HEAVY DUTY HINGED DOOR, STD FLYDOOR LATCH & CLOSET REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER DOORS, CUT OFF HINGES OF STEEL FRAME, SPUULY & FIX ALUM ANGLE SURROUND
27971	25-Jul-02	FRICTION CONTROL	$355.72	BEARINGS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27972	25-Jul-02	FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LIMITED	$8,781.17	PAYROLL PERSONNELL PROCESSING F/E 21/6/02
27973	25-Jul-02	FUCHS LUBRICANTS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD	$1,123.08	OIL TRANS AUTO ATF 4000 & TITAN UTTO/1206
27974	25-Jul-02	GUARDIAN DATA	$396.00	SEAGATE HARD DRIVE - IS
27975	25-Jul-02	HOSEMASTERS	$2,151.42	SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 96696
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 97619
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 96695
				SUPPLY FITTINGS 97691 3/6/2
				REPLACE STEEL TUBE ON 97003
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 96012
				REPLACE HOSE ON 98542
				SUPPLY AIR FITTINGS FOR WORKSHOP
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 96592
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 98763
				SUPPLY FITTINGS TO 96698
				REPLACE HOSE ON 98763
27976	25-Jul-02	HEAVY AUTOMATICS	$814.33	REPLACE TPS ON AUTO TRANS 96717
27977	25-Jul-02	HYSTER WEST	$379.39	VEE BELT (1361139) AND WATER PUMP
27978	25-Jul-02	I W D STRAPPING SALES PTY LTD	$2,827.64	STEEL STRAP FOR EWS
27979	25-Jul-02	JACKSONS DRAWING SUPPLIES P/L	$289.97	Art Supplies for art classes at Clarkson Youth Centre SUSPENSION STRIP RODIA 711 50 METRE ROLL
27980	25-Jul-02	JARAM PRODUCTS PTY LTD	$212.69	ROOF RACKS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
27981	25-Jul-02	GEOFF KEMP	$635.00	DISWASHER BRACKETS - QUINNS DAY CENTRE, ALEXANDER DAY CENTRE VACUUM AND BAGS - BANKSIA GROVE COMM CTR 5 MULTI DISC CD PLAYER WITH REMOTE CONTROL - YOUTH SERVICES, HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE
27982	25-Jul-02	LINK TELECOMMUNICATIONS	$136.93	MOBILE PHONE BILL
27983	25-Jul-02	LULLFITZ	$315.70	NATIVE TUBES - CITIZENSHIP CEREMONY PLANTS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS
27984	25-Jul-02	MIRCO BROS PTY LTD	$40.00	DYNAMIC LIFTER STD PELLETS
27985	25-Jul-02	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	$19,418.70	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR PLANT/VEHICLES FOR WORKSHOP
27986	25-Jul-02	MODERN TEACHING AIDS PTY LTD	$431.60	TOYS FOR JENOLAN WAY COMM CENTRE
27987	25-Jul-02	MODERN TEACHING AIDS PTY LTD	$1,268.00	Toys and Equipment for Banksia Grove Toy Library
27988	25-Jul-02	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	$2,349.16	SUPPLY/REPAIR RADIOS TO VARIOUS PLANT/VEHICLES FOR WORKSHOP
27989	25-Jul-02	M M ELECTRICAL MERCHANDISING	$162.46	ELECTRICAL SPARE PARTS FOR STORE STOCK
27990	25-Jul-02	N E C BUSINESS SOLUTIONS P/L	$2,310.29	EXT 5217 DTERM TO ANALOGUE, EXT 5226 ANALOGUE TO DIGITAL, RELOCATE ONE ANALOGUE RENEWAL OF NECARE SERVICE AGREEMENT 03451003 FOR NEAX 2400-L (01/07/02 TO 30/06/03)
27991	25-Jul-02	NOVUS WINDSCREEN REPAIRS	$776.50	SUPPLY & FIT WINDSCREENS FOR VARIOUS VEHICLES
27992	25-Jul-02	NILFISK - ADVANCE PTY LTD	$368.14	FILTER ELEMENT, D P MAIN SWITCH, RELAY, SIGNAL LAMP, PRESSURE SWITCH FOR VEHICLE REPAIRS
27993	25-Jul-02	NEWMART	$297.59	FOOD SUPPLIES FOR THE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT OFFICIAL UNVEILING AND OPEN DAY
27994	25-Jul-02	OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY PTY LTD	$2,002.00	LIFT MAINTENANCE, NEW CIVIC CENTRE - CORPORATE SERVICES
27995	25-Jul-02	PEERLESS EMULSION WA PTY LTD	$35.75	GYM CLEAN FOR STORE STOCK
27996	25-Jul-02	P R AGENCIES INDUSTRIAL PTY LTD	$673.20	POLAROID 600 TWIN EXTREME GLOSS - STORE STOCK
27997	25-Jul-02	PHOTOLAND	$95.75	DEVELOP FILM FOR TECH OPS CERTIFICATE FRAMES
27998	25-Jul-02	QUICKCOPY AUDIO SERVICES	$144.98	A5-CD SLIM PRESTIGE PRESENTATION FOLDERS - LIBRARY SERVICES
27999	25-Jul-02	GALVINS PLUMBING PLUS	$642.59	GALV MALLEABLE NIPPLE HEX 32, SOCKET 32, GALV PIPE - WORKSHOP, VEHICLE REPAIRS DEWALT RECIPROCATING SAW KIT - PARKS MAINTENANCE
28000	25-Jul-02	RYCO HOSE	$986.28	HOSE ASSY FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
28001	25-Jul-02	ROYAL LIFE SAVING SOCIETY W A	$70.00	PLG REQUAL COURSE FEES K SMITH
28002	25-Jul-02	REPCO AUTO PARTS	$778.36	BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER REFIT WRENCH-TORQUE RECONDITION PRESSURE PLATE MACHINE STEP FLYWHEEL & REMOVE PINS
28003	25-Jul-02	R & P ENGINEERING PTY LTD	$2,178.00	ROAD PROFILING AND SWEEPING
28004	25-Jul-02	RCG PTY LTD	$2,828.28	LANDFILL - RUBBLE MIXED AND FILL SAND
28005	25-Jul-02	SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY	$35.09	SHARPS CONT 1.4LT & PICK UP TONG - STORE STOCK
28006	25-Jul-02	SANDERSON ENGINEERING COMPANY	$1,041.80	VARIOUS CHAINSAW SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP
28007	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
28008	25-Jul-02	SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT	$556,859.88	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS AND REPAIRS FOR PLANT VEHICLES AND STOCK FOR DEPOT STORE VEHICLE INSPECTION & WEIGHBRIDGE FEES FOR WN 31758 Air bag pressure monitor system 4.5kg, fire extinguisher Acco F2350G/250 with MJE 23cm Side Load Body IVECO ACCO F2350G/250 TRUCK
28009	25-Jul-02	STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L	$2,455.90	CLEANING ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
28010	25-Jul-02	CADBURY SCHWEPPES	$219.39	COOL RIDGE, PEPSI, DIET PEPSI, PEPSI MAX, ORANGE JUICE, APPLE JUICE, APP/BLKCURRANT JUICE, WATER/LEMON, WAT LEM/LIME, BLUE BOLT GAT - MARKETING
28011	25-Jul-02	SPOTLIGHT STORES PTY LTD	$671.70	CRAFT ITEMS FOR BANKSIA GROVE ABORIGINAL WOMENS GROUP EQUIPMENT FOR FAMILY DAY CARE PROGRAM ACTIVITIES CRAFT RESOURCES FOR QUINNS DAY CENTRE
28012	25-Jul-02	TORO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$267.30	MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
28013	25-Jul-02	TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS	$4,513.86	PVC ELBOW 45DEG & 90DEG, SWJ PIPE 25MM PVC FITTINGS BRASS NUT & TAIL 20MM X 19MM HUNTERS
28014	25-Jul-02	TECHNICAL IRRIGATION IMPORTS	$21,736.55	INSURANCE WORK AGAINST CARRAMAR GOLF COURSE
28015	25-Jul-02	T L ENGINEERING (AUST) PTY LTD	$192.89	MICROSWITCH 95047
28016	25-Jul-02	TOOLMART	$88.20	GROUT REMOVER - BUILDING MAINT SERVICE& REPAIR 3/4 " IMPACT GUN
28017	25-Jul-02	L & T VENABLES	$262.58	VARIOUS TOOLS FOR EWS AND FLEET MAINTENANCE
28018	25-Jul-02	WESTCARE INDUSTRIES	$136.95	SAFETY VESTS MICRO MESH FLURO RED SIZE XL WITH CITY OF WANNEROO LOGO - DEPOT STORE STOCK
28019	25-Jul-02	WESTBOOKS	$399.60	LIBRARY BOOKS
28020	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
28021	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO HARDWARE	$3,153.66	VARIOUS TOOLS, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
28022	25-Jul-02	WESTFUEL	$1,132.65	FUEL TWO STROKE 25 - 1 MIX - DEPOT STORE STOCK
28023	25-Jul-02	WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS	$2,863.30	FIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICED - DEPOT OFFICE TRUCK FIRE HOSE, STORZ COUPL. ADAPTOR STZ FIREFIGHTING HELMETS AND STICKERS
28024	25-Jul-02	WILSONS SIGN SOLUTIONS	$3,839.00	SUPPLY SIGNS FOR WANNEROO CITY COUNCIL DEPOT
28025	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY	$546.07	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
28026	25-Jul-02	W A LIBRARY SUPPLIES	$286.99	LASER LABELS/COMPACT DISC PAPER AND STORAGE POUCHES FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BOOK MENDING EQUIP FOR FAMILY DAY CARE TOY LIBRARY
28027	25-Jul-02	WELLINGTON SURPLUS STORES	$160.20	HELL WEG BELT, GARRISON UNLINED, STYLE (FOR RANGERS)
28028	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
28029	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
28030	25-Jul-02	CANCELLED	$0.00
28031	24-Jul-02	PRD SOFTWARE PTY LTD	$825.00	ADDITIONAL LICENCE VERSION 5 - IS
28032	24-Jul-02	METEOR NOMINEES P/L	$819.50	STONE PLINTH FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
28033	24-Jul-02	SPORTS TURF TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD	$5,984.00	STAFF TRAINING - 7 PARKS MAIN. EMPLOYEES CONDUCT ORGANIC FINES MEASUREMENTS & INSPECT & PREPARE REPORT ON GOLF COURSE CONDITION INSPECTION & REPORT ON CONDITION OF 20 PARKS TURFCHECK 2002 KINGSWAY BRITISH SOCCER OVAL
28034	24-Jul-02	WANNEROO ORCHID SOCIETY	$1,000.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28035	24-Jul-02	CITIZEN'S ADVICE BUREAU	$1,100.00	PROVISION OF MEDIATION SERVICES - ANNUAL CONTRACT RENEWAL
28036	24-Jul-02	GEARY SIGNS	$159.50	ADVERTISING SIGN FOR WESCO ROAD NOWERGUP
28037	24-Jul-02	ARENA ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT	$100.00	PERFORMANCE OF THE STORYKEEPER IX AT GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY ON THE 11/07/02
28038	24-Jul-02	ETHNIC CHILDCARE RESOURCE UNIT	$88.00	MEMBERSHIP OF ETHNIC CHILD CARE RESOURCE UNIT'S MOBILE LIBRARY
28039	24-Jul-02	SUNCITY NEWSAGENCY	$27.72	NEWSPAPER DELIVERY - YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS LIBRARY FOR THE PERIOD 3/06/02 TO 30/06/02
28040	24-Jul-02	AHL HOLDINGS LIMITED	$297.03	OVERPAYMENT OF RATES - P/N 198132
28041	24-Jul-02	LIGHT CAR CLUB OF W. A. (INC)	$868.00	LIGHT CAR CLUB MEMBERSHIP & LICENCES - YOUTH RALLY TEAM
28042	24-Jul-02	HUDSON SOFTWARE	$137.50	25 USER WHO'S IN ADD ON S/N 782769015348
28043	24-Jul-02	KITE KENETICS	$21.00	KITE WORKSHOP FOR FAMILY DAY CARE SERVICES
28044	24-Jul-02	POLAIR THE COMPRESSED AIT SHOP	$275.00	SUPPLY ACCESSORIES & INSTALL REFRIGERATED AIR DRYER
28045	24-Jul-02	MACWRITE PUBLICITY SERVICES	$171.60	ADVERTISING CHARGES- SCHOOL MATTERS NEWSPAPER
28046	24-Jul-02	LORI JO LUNDGREN	$325.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 107 MOORPARK AVENUE YANCHEP
28047	24-Jul-02	DAVID S GONZALEZ	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 12 LILAC HILL VISTA
28048	24-Jul-02	SHARON ELIZABETH FYT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 4 WILLESPIE DRIVE PEARSALL
28049	24-Jul-02	GUY HUTCHINSON & BRENDA NISTOR	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 57 FLAGTAIL OUTLOOK YANCHEP
28050	24-Jul-02	SUMITHRA SOPHIA HENRY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 11 LITHGOW DRIVE CLARKSON
28051	24-Jul-02	JOHN MCKINLAY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 27 SILVERTON AVENUE BUTLER
28052	24-Jul-02	JULIA & CHRISTOPHER DURRANT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 16 ARDMORE TERRANCE DARCH
28053	24-Jul-02	STANLEY R & CHRISTINE A NELSON	$330.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 16 FROND CIRCUIT
28054	24-Jul-02	GRANT RUSSELL & SUSANN POVEY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY 45 HALIFAX BOULEVARD MINDARIE
28055	24-Jul-02	GEORGE STARR	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 62 MOORPARK AVENUE
28056	24-Jul-02	TRENT BRADLEY HANCOCK	$317.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 41 O'GRADY WAY GIRRAWHEEN
28057	24-Jul-02	GLENDA SIMONE MINERS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 12 MOWBRAY SQUARE CLARKSON
28058	24-Jul-02	ALEXANDER & CORAL STEVENSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 24 DOWNING CRESCENT WANNEROO
28059	24-Jul-02	LACHLAN J & SUZANNE M REID	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 64 ABBOTSWOOD DRIVE LANDSDALE
28060	24-Jul-02	CHRISTOPHER LEWIS GALBRAITH	$300.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 17 TERAGLIN VISTA YANCHEP
28061	24-Jul-02	STEVEN JOHN & CINDY ARNOLD	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 55 FLAGTAIL OUTLOOK YANCHEP
28062	24-Jul-02	MARIA KNIGHT & RICK MOFFITT	$340.54	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 12 BLUFF WAY MINDARIE
28063	24-Jul-02	CATHOLIC CHURCH INSURANCE	$423.62	INSURANCE EXCESS ON CLAIM 2195055
28064	24-Jul-02	MICHAEL SEAN REA	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28065	24-Jul-02	THOMAS FRENCH & LOUISE HORTON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28066	24-Jul-02	REBECCA ANN ELLERY	$317.65	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28067	24-Jul-02	PAMELA & CHRISTOPHER DENNY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28068	24-Jul-02	RON STAPLETON	$300.00	BOND REFUND AHCH MAIN HALL 29/6/02 - 30/6/02
28069	24-Jul-02	SAMANTHA BROWN	$300.00	BOND REFUND HALL HIRE GUMBLOSSOM CRAFT ROOM 13/07/02
28070	24-Jul-02	MANOJA DE TISSERA	$275.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28071	24-Jul-02	CATHERINE DAVIS	$220.42	PENSION REBATE - P/N 150987
28072	24-Jul-02	JOY-ANNE BUCHANAN	$213.50	PENSION REBATE - P/N/ 155791
28073	24-Jul-02	D JARVIS	$109.34	PENSION REBATE - P/N 161235
28074	24-Jul-02	M FRANCIS & R GALLAGHER	$226.79	PENSION REBATE - P/N 173663
28075	24-Jul-02	J FARRIS	$148.00	PENSION REBATE - P/N 182629
28076	24-Jul-02	CRAWFORD F WALKER	$136.88	OVERPAYMENT OF RATES P/N 179565
28077	24-Jul-02	MONTROSE PRIMARY SCHOOL	$330.00	ROADWISE GRANT FOR "SAFER ROUTES TO SCHOOL"
28078	24-Jul-02	WANNEROO JUNIOR PRIMARY	$330.00	ROADWISE GRANT FOR "SAFER ROUTES TO SCHOOL"
28079	24-Jul-02	ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE	$550.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28080	24-Jul-02	WANNEROO & OCEAN REEF	$1,800.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28081	24-Jul-02	BLESSING OF THE FLEET FESTIVAL	$5,500.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28082	24-Jul-02	QUINNS ROCKS RSL	$1,000.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28083	24-Jul-02	MICHELLE WEBSTER	$150.00	REIMBURSMENT OF STAFF MEMBERS PERSONAL EXPENSES - MICHELLE WEBSTER - FAMILY SERVICES
28084	24-Jul-02	DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING	$2,581.87	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 15 GIDGI WAY, WANNEROO
28085	24-Jul-02	ALAN BARNETT	$143.86	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 9 BIRKENHEAD RIDGE, MINDARIE
28086	24-Jul-02	CARLOTTA NOMINEES PTY LTD	$2,000.00	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 53 WESCO RD, NOWERGUP
28087	24-Jul-02	IOSIF DAVID	$381.97	RATES REFUND
28088	24-Jul-02	JACQUELINE EDWARDS	$300.00	BOND REFUND - GUMBLOSSOM ACTIVITY ROOM
28089	24-Jul-02	COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS	$11,207.80	ADVERTISING FOR APRIL 2002
28090	24-Jul-02	ADVANCE LOCK & KEY	$88.00	CALL TO CENTRE ENTRY TO FRONT DOOR LOCK & REPLACE
28091	24-Jul-02	B & G CHAMBERS	$507.50	CATERING FOR 25 GUESTS - MORNING TEA ON 1/07/02 - ELECTED MEMBERS CATERING FOR 20 GUESTS - POLICY FORUM - JARRAH DINING ROOM ON 9/07/2
28092	24-Jul-02	C W D CONTRACTORS	$8,360.00	COMPACTOR TRUCKS & BOBCAT/FORKS FLEET MAINTENANCE
28093	24-Jul-02	WANNEROO TOWNSITE COMMUNITY GROUP	$2,500.00	COMMUNITY FUNDING SCHEME - GRANT
28094	24-Jul-02	WANGARA CRANES (MEENCO PTY LTD)	$462.00	RELOCATE PLASTIC BAILER AT BADGERUP
28095	25-Jul-02	AMF MORLEY BOWL	$223.20	2GAMES OF BOWLING $13.95 HOLIDAY SPECIAL - YOUTH SERVICES HOLIDAY PROGRAMS
28096	25-Jul-02	BUDGET PORTABLES	$2,371.97	SECURITY CONTAINERS AND CHEMICAL TOILET HIRE FOR ONSITE WORKS
28097	25-Jul-02	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$3,986.39	CREDIT 6 DAYS HIRE MACHINE INV 8805491 REPAIRS TO MUSTANG 2040 S/N SF98H002620 & HIRE OF MUSTANG
28098	25-Jul-02	BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS	$16.96	DEATH COMES FOR THE ARCHBISHOP - BOOK PURCHASE FOR MOBILE LIBRARY
28099	25-Jul-02	GRAND TOYOTA DAIHATSU	$290.88	REPLACEMENT OF PASSENGER SIDE WINDOW
28100	25-Jul-02	HOT MIX	$213.40	SUPPLY OF COLD MIX 19/6/2 - TECH OPS
28101	25-Jul-02	C & E M HARMER	$704.45	NEWSPAPER DELIVERY FOR NEW CIVIC CENTRE
28102	25-Jul-02	MCLEOD & CO	$512.60	LEGAL FEES FOR THE CITY OF WANNEROO
28103	25-Jul-02	MUNICIPAL LIABILITY SCHEME	$129,563.50	SECOND INSTALMENT CONTRIBUTION FOR PERIOD 01/07/02 TO 30/06/03
28104	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$223.75	MILK SUPPLIES FOR CITY
28105	25-Jul-02	WATTLEUP TRACTORS	$563.65	SPARE PARTS FOR PLANT/VEHICLE REPAIRS - FLEET MAINTENANCE
28106	25-Jul-02	AIBS WA CHAPTER	$132.00	ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRAINING 10/07/02 SEMINAR: SAM NEALE & CLEMENT WILLIAMS
28107	25-Jul-02	AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS	$7.00	PAYROLL DED F/E 19/07/02
28108	25-Jul-02	ALINTA GAS	$131.45	USAGE CHARGES AND RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE X 1
28109	25-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$40.80	PETTY CASH
28110	25-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION	$64.50	PAYROLL DED F/E 19/07/02
28111	25-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$36.35	PETTY CASH
28112	25-Jul-02	AUST BUSINESS TELEPHONE CO	$1,655.50	ON HOOK DIAL HEADSET TELEPHONE 20 MEMORY KEYS GREY - INFORMATION SERVICES
28113	25-Jul-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
28114	25-Jul-02	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	$807.69	APPLICATION NO A3606010501 PAYROLL DED F/E 12/04/02
28115	25-Jul-02	BAPTIST CARE	$70.50	PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR CACP - CLIENTS
28116	25-Jul-02	BRIERTY CONTRACTORS PTY LTD	$16,346.33	QUINNS BEACH FORESHORE PROTECTION WORKS AS PER QUOTE DATED 14 JUNE 2002- PROGRESS PAYMENT FOR JUNE 2002
28117	25-Jul-02	CITY OF PERTH	$207.44	SHARE OF VODAPHONE NETWORK P/L - MINDARI LEASE TAMALA PARK COSTS OF LEGAL FEES
28118	25-Jul-02	COURIER AUSTRALIA	$13.97	COURIER SERVICE
28119	25-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT	$2,017.91	OFFSITE STORAGE/COURIER/LODGEMENT OF BOXES FOR FORMER CITY OF WANNEROO RECORDS CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS SALARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER AT YELLOGONGA 13 - 24 MAY 2002 & 27 - 07 JUNE 2002
28120	25-Jul-02	COMMODORE HOMES	$55.00	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 125 TAPPING WAY, QUINNS ROCKS
28121	25-Jul-02	CAPE DEMOLITION	$22.00	20 BRISTILE ROOF TILES
28122	25-Jul-02	CABCHARGE	$287.83	TAXI SERIVICS
28123	25-Jul-02	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	$446.00	PAYROLL DED F/E 19/07/02
28124	25-Jul-02	CITY OF JOONDALUP SERVICES INVOICES	$110.49	50% OF TELTRA COMMUNICATION COSTS
28125	25-Jul-02	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	$2,135.70	FOOD SUPPLIED FOR VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
28126	25-Jul-02	CONTEK COMMUNICATIONS	$1,909.60	PIPE WORKS ALTERATIONS TO TELSTRA NETWORK FOR NEW DRAINAGE
28127	25-Jul-02	DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF - MARANGAROO	$21,313.58	MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE COMMINSSIONS 1-30 JUNE 2002
28128	25-Jul-02	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$2,039.25	VALUATION ROLLS-CONSOLIDATED GRV INT VALS METRO SHARED
28129	25-Jul-02	DENSFORD PTY LTD	$36,754.85	STORMWATER DRAINAGE UPGRADE WORKS IN GOOLEMA PLACE, WANNEROO
28130	25-Jul-02	DEWSONS WANNEROO	$446.26	FOOD SHOPPING FOR YOUTH SERVICES CAMP
28131	25-Jul-02	D G CONSULTING	$2,340.80	ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH WORK
28132	25-Jul-02	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	$66.00	EUTH 4 DOGS - RANGERS
28133	25-Jul-02	EXCEL CABLING	$400.00	CABLE INSTALLATION (CLARKSON MULTI MEDIA CENTRE)
28134	25-Jul-02	FAMILY DAY CARE SCHEMES OF WA INC	$541.20	PROMOTIONAL LEVY FOR 2002/2003 - AMOUNT BASED ON AMOUNT OF PROGRAMS
28135	25-Jul-02	GEL GROUP PTY LTD	$4,955.78	ACCOUNTS CLERK(C SIRCAR) RATES OFFICER H COOPER
28136	25-Jul-02	GLENFORDS TOOL CENTRE	$72.00	LARGE TOOL BOX - FLEET MAINTENANCE
28137	25-Jul-02	HOMESTYLE PTY LTD	$200.00	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 33 PALM CORNER, QUINNS ROCKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - 40 PALM CORNER, QUINNS ROCKS
28138	25-Jul-02	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$18,476.68	RECREATIONAL CARE FOR ABORIGINAL PROGRAM, CACP AND HACC CLIENTS
28139	25-Jul-02	IRRIGATION ASSOC OF AUSTRALIA	$110.00	HARD COPY OF PROCEEDINGS - CONFERENCE "IRRIGATION CONSERVATION OR CONFLICT?" CONFERENCE - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
28140	25-Jul-02	IINET TECHNOLOGIES	$400.00	ANNUAL CHARG FOR EXPLORER SERVICE LYNNOG 18/7-18/703
28141	25-Jul-02	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	$2,816.00	CLEAN GUTTERS.GUMBLOSSOM CRAFTROOM, HALL & COMMUNITY CENTRE ERECT ANTI-GRAFFITTI PLINTH & LAY BRICK PAVERS REMOVE HARDI SHEETING FROM EAVES
28142	25-Jul-02	LOVEGROVE TURF SERVICES PTY LTD	$1,980.00	TREE PLANTING AND LANDSCAPE STAGE 2 - EXTRA COSTS DUE TO FOOTING BEING LARGER THAN ANTICIPATED QUOTE
28143	25-Jul-02	LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES PETTY CASH	$156.05	PETTY CASH
28144	25-Jul-02	MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER	$210.19	COURIER SERVICE
28145	25-Jul-02	MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL	$1,129.54	PAYROLL DED F/E 19/7/02
28146	25-Jul-02	MUNICIPAL INS BROKING SVCS WA	$134,349.11	CONTRACT WORKS INSURANCE RENEWAL FOR THE PERIOD 30/06/02 TO 30/06/03 RENEWAL 30/06/02-30/06/03 DIRECT PECUNIARY LOSS OF MONEY GOODS RENEWAL 30/06/02-30/06/03 DEATH OR PERSONAL INJURY OF UNSURED PERSONS RENEWAL 30/06/02-30/06/03 BUSHFIRE ACT 1954 RENEWAL 30/06/02-30/06/03 LIABILTY TO COUNCILLORS MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE FOR THE PERIOD 30/06/02 TO 30/06/03
28147	25-Jul-02	MOVE CLOTHING & LINEN SUPPLIES	$356.95	STAFF UNIFORMS
28148	25-Jul-02	MEERILINGA YOUNG CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC	$400.00	2 X REGISTRATIONS FOR FDC FORUM SEPT02 DELYSE STERPINI AND JEANETTE EWERS
28149	25-Jul-02	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$92.95	FREIGHT URGENT - MEY EQUIP/BAYSWATER – COW (TRUCK REQ)
28150	25-Jul-02	NON-ORGANIC DISPOSALS	$1,661.00	DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS FROM FRANKLIN RD, CROMWELL, HUDSON & BERWYN GIRRAWHEEN G3, BUTTERWORTH 7 BEACH RD G3, THE AVE G4, CONCRETE FOOTPATH & KERBING G4 DKT NO 11075, RUBBLE TO TIP DKT NO 11082, DKT NO 11083
28151	25-Jul-02	NICK DEL BORRELLO	$1,606.00	LABOUR, MATERIALS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
28152	25-Jul-02	OPTUS COMMUNICATIONS	$42.95	MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE
28153	25-Jul-02	PARKS & LEISURE AUSTRALIA	$50.00	SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL OF "AUSTRALIAN PARKS & LEISURE"Australian Parks and Leisure Journal"
28154	25-Jul-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$35.00	PETTY CASH
28155	25-Jul-02	QUALITY PRESS	$3,995.00	CITY OF WANNEROO STRATEGIC PLAN
28156	25-Jul-02	ROADS 2000	$810.00	SUPPLY & LAY ASPHALT - CNR MARANGAROO DR & WANNEROO RD
28157	25-Jul-02	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	$101.86	BANNISTER BRUSH, BROOM HANDLE, BROOM INDUSTRIAL MIX - DEPOT STORE
28158	25-Jul-02	SKATERS ON ICE	$168.00	ICE SKATING - YOUTH SERVICES SCHOOL HOLIDAY PROGRAM
28159	25-Jul-02	STATE REVENUE DEPARTMENT	$436.45	REFUND STATE REV - LATE PAYMENT - PROPERTY 125944 PROPERTY NO. 100615 REBATED IN ERROR
28160	25-Jul-02	STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS	$98.67	WILSON W RESPITE.NURSE WILG
28161	25-Jul-02	SIZZLER BELDON	$211.90	YANCHEP YOUNG WOMENS GROUP OUTING
28162	25-Jul-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$188.60	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
28163	25-Jul-02	TECHNICAL OPERATIONS PETTY CASH	$354.90	PETTY CASH
28164	25-Jul-02	WESTSIDE CONCRETE CONTRACTORS	$4,928.00	SUPPLY & LAY CONCRETE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
28165	25-Jul-02	WATER CORPORATION	$12,382.30	AFTER HOURS LEISURE & RANGERS SERVICE
28166	25-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$32,383.85	USAGE CHARGES FOR VARIOUS FACILITIE RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE X 3
28167	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO TAVERN	$100.00	LUNCH OUT FOR BANKSIA GOVE ABORIGINAL WOMEN'S GROUP
28168	25-Jul-02	WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING	$495.00	COMMUNITY CONSULTATION LEAFLETS
28169	25-Jul-02	WANNEROO PASTRY HOUSE	$14.60	JAM DONUTS.ECLAIRS.APPLE PIES.CUSTARD TARTS.MUD SLICES FOR FUNCTION HELD BY EWS
28170	31-Jul-02	SKILLPATH SEMINARS	$199.00	DEALING WITH NEGATIVE ATTITUDES - DAVID GREEN
28171	31-Jul-02	FESA	$83,461.00	1ST QUARTER CONTRIBUTION - DISTRICT ASSESS.
28172	31-Jul-02	DEPARTMENT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$96.00	TITLE SEARCH
28173	31-Jul-02	STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	$451.00	LIBRARY BOOKS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
28174	31-Jul-02	ERGOLINK	$185.00	HIRE OF COPYFLEX
28175	31-Jul-02	MIKE THORP-BUILDER	$34,571.79	PROJECT WANNEROO SPORTS & SOCIAL CLUB
28176	31-Jul-02	SLICKER STICKERS	$418.00	KANGAROO PAW STICKERS - MARKETING
28177	31-Jul-02	R RUSSELL-BROWN	$270.00	PROVISION OF TAI CHI LESSONS TERM 2 10-MAY-5 JULY - YANCHEP COMM CTR
28178	31-Jul-02	KERRICK INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT	$636.70	PRESSURE CLEAN, SWITCH AND GUN
28179	31-Jul-02	LIGHT CAR CLUB OF W. A. (INC)	$564.00	NEW MEMBERSHIP - YOUTH RALLY TEAM
28180	31-Jul-02	QUINNS DISTRICT JUNIOR FOOTBALL CLUB	$300.00	BOND REFUND - GUMBLOSSOM SPORTS HALL
28181	31-Jul-02	NATIONAL CHILDCARE ACCREDITATION COUNCIL INC	$253.00	FAMILY DAY CARE QA SYSTEM - REG FEE
28182	31-Jul-02	G R CHAPMAN & R A PICKERING	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28183	31-Jul-02	LEE CHAPLIN-ARDAGH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28184	31-Jul-02	NOLA MERYL FOWLER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28185	31-Jul-02	KERRY & TREVOR STRYDOM	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28186	31-Jul-02	ANDREW & EVE NURSE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28187	31-Jul-02	HEATHER & DAVID WILLIAMS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28188	31-Jul-02	SAMUEL & LESLEY RASHEED	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28189	31-Jul-02	J R THOMPSON & C R BROWN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28190	31-Jul-02	CATHERINE L FOX	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28191	31-Jul-02	DONAVAN GOH & ANN KHOO	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28192	31-Jul-02	SUSAN J VLODARSKI	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28193	31-Jul-02	LESLEY DOYLE & ALAN HEYS	$259.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28194	31-Jul-02	WENDY PEARCE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
28195	31-Jul-02	KEITH THOMPSON	$536.50	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198535
28196	31-Jul-02	JOHN & WINIFRED BILLINGTON	$527.38	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198545
28197	31-Jul-02	JOYCE SHEPHERD	$546.61	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198544
28198	31-Jul-02	JOAN & PHILLIP KIDD	$517.27	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198524
28199	31-Jul-02	NORMAN & SHIRLEY BRITTEN	$527.38	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198537
28200	31-Jul-02	JOAN & WILLIAM JEFFREY	$69.27	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198525
28201	31-Jul-02	FREDERICK & JOYCE DUNFORD	$448.00	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198527
28202	31-Jul-02	ANTHONY & YVONNE BARTON	$536.50	RATES REFUND - PURPLE TITLE - P/N 198538
28203	31-Jul-02	DA FALCONE & CN HOULAHAN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 131 DP27399 VOL 2509 FOL 510
28204	31-Jul-02	RENE A & R R AVALOS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 161 DP 28764 VOL 2511 FOL 212
28205	31-Jul-02	CAROL M & G S WILLIAMS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 1274 P 24248 VOL 2197 FOL 822
28206	31-Jul-02	BRENNDEN & J WATSON	$240.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY LOT 152 P 11610VOL 1439 FOL 103
28207	31-Jul-02	MS JULIE MOTTRAM	$111.62	BEING CHILD CARE BENEFIT COMPONENT FOR CHILDCARE FEES
28208	31-Jul-02	ANITA CURKOSKS	$300.00	BOND REFUND-ALEXANDER HGHTS.COMM HALL MAIN HALL 13-14/07/02
28209	31-Jul-02	DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE	$46.00	RE REGISTRATION FO STOCK BRAND
28210	31-Jul-02	MS KELLY MORRIS	$7.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND TAG 02/6373
28211	31-Jul-02	MS KAY HALL	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND TAG 02/6212
28212	31-Jul-02	MS SINEAD TONKIN	$40.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND TAG 02/4628 DOG REGISTRATION REFUND TAG 02/4629
28213	31-Jul-02	MR RYAN BURGESS	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND TAG 02/6211
28214	31-Jul-02	BUDGET PORTABLES	$707.19	HIRE OF CHEMICAL TOILET, LUNCH ROOM, SECURITY CONTAINER & PUMP-OUTS ON 30/04/02 FOR HESTER AVE SITE (BETWEEN RENSHAW & CONNOLLY DR, CLARKSON
28215	31-Jul-02	C & E M HARMER	$39.40	NEWSPAPER DELIVERY FOR NEW CIVIC CENTRE
28216	31-Jul-02	REINOL-PROCHEM WA	$92.40	NATURAL REINOL HAND CLEANER CARTRIDGE
28217	31-Jul-02	SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT	$269,797.65	VEHICLE INSPECTION & WEIGHBRIDGE FEES SUPPLY OF 1 X IVECO ACCO F2350G/250 TRUCK, AIR GAUGE WEIGHING SYSTEM & 4.5KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER
28218	31-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$46.05	PETTY CASH
28219	31-Jul-02	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$89.10	PETTY CASH
28220	31-Jul-02	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
28221	31-Jul-02	C W D CONTRACTORS	$8,360.00	BOB-CATS & COMPACTOR TRUCKS FOR THE PERIOD 2/07/02 TO 3/07/02
28222	31-Jul-02	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$141.20	PETTY CASH
28223	31-Jul-02	EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$201.95	PETTY CASH
28224	31-Jul-02	GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$220.90	PETTY CASH
28225	31-Jul-02	GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$304.70	ENVIRODYE RED - WEED KILLER
28226	31-Jul-02	MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS	$200.00	B.BOY WORKSHOP - YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM
28227	31-Jul-02	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$18.95	PETTY CASH
28228	31-Jul-02	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$150.00	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
28229	31-Jul-02	WESTERN POWER	$335.85	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
28230	31-Jul-02	WESTERN AUSTRALIAN TREASURY CORPORATION	$15,750.00	SINKING FUND NO. 126
28231	31-Jul-02	WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING	$160.00	A4 COVERS FOR PLANNING
28232	31-Jul-02	YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE P/CASH	$139.80	PETTY CASH
50000358	05-Jul-02	BRIAN JONES	$1,932.52	RESIGNED / TERMINATION
50000359	05-Jul-02	ROBERT RIDDELL	$5,714.95	TERMINATION
50000360	05-Jul-02	LESLIE FRANCIS	$149.77	UNDERPAID ON OVERTIME
50000361	05-Jul-02	JUDITH HUGHES	$346.50	CHILDCARE SHORT PAID ON CHQ26140
50000362	09-Jul-02	ERICA McDERMOTT	$86.00	CONTRACT EXPIRED NOT PAID 21/06/02 & 5/07/02
50000363	09-Jul-02	LOUISE MCNAMARA	$1,291.24	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE MILEAGE 2352 @ .549 CENTS
50000364	10-Jul-02	BRIAN JONES	$1,932.50	RESIGNED/TERMINATION
50000365	10-Jul-02	JANET NICHOL	$555.50	WRONG ACCOUNT NUMBER KEYED 5/07/02
50000366	10-Jul-02	BRODY PRIDEAUX	$340.46	DIDNOT GET PAID ORDINARY HRS 5/07/02
50000367	10-Jul-02	BRADLEY DEPIAZZ	$675.50	DIDNOT GET PAID ORDINARY HRS 5/07/02
50000368	10-Jul-02	KYLE SMITH	$363.27	DIDNOT GET PAID ORDINARY HRS 5/07/02
50000369	10-Jul-02	RUDI STEFFENS	$192.43	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE 304 KM @ .633 CENTS
50000370	11-Jul-02	MELANIE BROWNE	$217.04	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000371	11-Jul-02	EMMA ATKINSON	$920.68	WORKERS COMPENSATION NOT PAID 5/07/02
50000372	11-Jul-02	EDWARD RICHARDS	$67.42	UNDER PAID ANNUAL LEAVE ON TERMINATION
50000373	11-Jul-02	SHARON KABLE	$167.40	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000374	11-Jul-02	KEY HYDRAULICS	$1,089.00	INVOICE ENGINEERING REPAIRS
50000375	12-Jul-02	CHARLIE MARSHALL	$2,432.16	OVERTIME DATES JUNE & JULY & HIGHER DUTIES DATING BACK TO 18/03/02
50000376	15-Jul-02	GJ & LJ BORRELLO	$22,341.00	BOND REFUND SEALING & DRAINAGE WORKS
50000377	16-Jul-02	KEY HYDRAULICS	$1,415.70	ENGINEERING REPAIRS AT MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY
50000378	16-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	$161,536.47	PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS FORTNIGHT ENDING 05/07/02
50000379	16-Jul-02	RECYCLING CO OF WA PTY LTD	$82,352.15	BREAKDOWN CHARGE FOR PLASTIC BALER HIRE FORKLIFT MOTIVATION DRIVE WANGARA MONTH OF MAY 2002 MIXED PAPER PROCESSING FEES ONP PROCESSING FEES CARDBOARD PROCESSING FEES ONP PROCESSING FEES STEEL CANS/ALUMINIUM
50000380	17-Jul-02	IAN GOODENOUGH	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000381	17-Jul-02	MAUREEN GRIERSON	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000382	17-Jul-02	JUDITH HUGHES	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000383	17-Jul-02	JON KELLY	$6,000.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000384	17-Jul-02	TERRY LOFTUS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000385	17-Jul-02	GLYNIS MONKS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000386	17-Jul-02	LOUISE MCNAMARA	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000387	17-Jul-02	LYNN O'GRADY	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000388	17-Jul-02	RECYCLING CO OF WA PTY LTD	$67,148.44	ONP PROCESSING FEES.STEEL CANS.ALUMINIUM
50000389	17-Jul-02	RUDI STEFFENS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000390	17-Jul-02	JOHN STEWART	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000391	17-Jul-02	BRETT TREBY	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE
50000392	25-Jul-02	MELANIE BROWNE	$223.14	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000393	25-Jul-02	SHARON KABLE	$270.80	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000394	25-Jul-02	WG & FE STOCKS	$238.47	IN HOME CARE SALARY
50000395	25-Jul-02	RAINETECH	$374.00	COLDFUSION TRAINING - JAMES RIDGEWAY
50000396	29-Jul-02	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	$164,423.80	PAYROLL DED: F/ENDING 19-JULY-2002
			$4,476,402.50

LESS CANCELLED CHEQUES
			-$2,988.70	AMOUNT OVER RECOUPED IN JUNE 2002
24780	11-Apr-02	JANOME SEWING CENTRE	-$18.50
25122	18-Apr-02	BRIAN CAPON	-$6.00
26875	20-Jun-02	MULTICULTURAL AGED CARE SERVICE	-$29.70
26911	20-Jun-02	NECALL PTY LTD	-$275.00
23186	07-Feb-02	RAPI	-$10.00
23592	26-Feb-02	THOMPSON HUGHES & CO	-$3,082.20
22390	10-Jan-02	SIZER BUILDERS	-$1,063.52
		Sub Total	-$7,473.62

TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNT RECOUP FOR JULY 2002			$4,468,928.88

City of Wanneroo Municipal Account

Cheque	Date	Paid To	Amount	Details

177	19-Jul-02	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	$1,776,887.23	RECOUP CHEQUE NO: 27372 - 27927
				EFT DOC: 50000358 - 50000391

178	01-Aug-02	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	$2,692,041.65	RECOUP CHEQUE NO: 27928 - 28232
				EFT DOC: 500003927 - 50000396

		Sub Total	$4,468,928.88
Others
0177B	22-Jul-02	COMMONWEALTH BANK	$820.15	CBA MERCHANT FEES
			$82.01	GST ON MERCHANT FEES
			$100.40	CBA EFTPOS FEES
			$10.04	GST ON EFTPOS FEES
			$636.36	GLF POOLING FEE
			$63.63	GST ON POOLING FEE
			$45.00	STOP PAYMENT FEES
			$25,240.53	FDC SALARY
			$2.50	SALARY RETURN FEE
			$507,119.47	WANNEROO SALARY
			$5,679.97	DEDUCTIONS
			$2.50	SALARY RETURN FEE
			$100.00	DISHONOURED PAYMENTS
			$723.73	BPAY FEE
			$1,457.99	BANK FEES

		Sub Total	$542,084.28

00178A	23-Jul-02	COMMONWEALTH BANK	$60,000.00	CBA INVESTMENT
			$26,993.68	FDC SALARY
			$2.00	BANK FEES
			$507,187.97	WCC SALARY
			$5,507.82	DEDUCTIONS
			$2.50	SALARY RETURN FEE
			$350,000.00	INVESTMENT
			$700,000.00	INVESTMENT
			$300,000.00	INVESTMENT
			$347.82	BLDNG DISHONOUR
			$28,226.86	FDC SALARY
			$636.37	GLF POOLING FEE
			$63.63	GST ON POOLING FEE
			$60.00	STOP PAYMENT FEE
			$300.00	DISHONOUR BOND CHQ

		Sub Total	$2,379,328.65

Total Municipal Account for July 2002			$7,390,341.81

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Community Development

18. Community Care Deed of Agreement

File Ref: 01075

File Name: AAComCar.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the Community Care Deed of Agreement

Background

The City receives funding from the Federal Department of Health and Ageing for the provision of Community Aged Care Packages and has been involved in the provision of this service for a number of years.

A revised agreement came into force in December 2001 for new and existing allocations of Community Aged Care Packages. This agreement is known as the Community Care Deed of Agreement and must be signed and dated by the authorised signatory and returned to the State Office for counter signing.

Detail

Community Aged Care Packages are planned and managed packages of community care services to help older people with complex care needs remain living in their own homes. They are designed for each individual and are based on their particular needs.

The types of services that may be provided as part of an individualised package include:

1. Assistance with bathing;

2. Meal preparation;

3. Laundry;

4. Dressing;

5. Transport;

6. Housework;

7. In home respite;

8. Home maintenance; and

9. Social activities.

The City is currently funded for eighteen Community Aged Care Packages. As an Approved Provider the City is required to sign the Community Care Deed of Agreement. However the City can terminate the Agreement as detailed in section 5 of the document by providing reasonable written notice. A copy of the contract is available in the Councillors’ Reading Room.

Comment

Should Council determine not to sign the Agreement, this shall result in the withdrawal of funding by the Federal Department of Health and Ageing and the consequent termination of the provision of this service by the City within the community.

The City’s Contracts Manager has sighted the Agreement and has indicated there are no major concerns regarding its content.

Statutory Compliance

A Council resolution is required to allow the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo.

Strategic Implications

The provision of Community Aged Care Packages is in line with the City’s Strategic Plan in the following areas:

“2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity; and

2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Funding for the financial year 2002-2003 from the Federal Department of Health and Ageing and Council contribution to the Community Aged Care Packages Program is detailed in the table below:

Government Grants and Subsidies	$192,000.00
Council Contribution	$ 34,820.00

The signing of this agreement does not have any effect on the adopted budget. Should Council determine not to sign the agreement, the City will lose access to funding and will no longer be able to provide Community Aged Care Packages.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to execute and affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Community Care Deed of Agreement between the City of Wanneroo and the Federal Department of Health and Ageing.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

19. Request For Budget Allocation - Youth Challenge Camp

File Ref: 07116

File Name: AAReqfor.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a budget variation to reflect a grant of $3,575.00 from SGIO.

Background

Youth Services recently received sponsorship of $3,575.00 from the SGIO Crimesafe Initiative fund for the purpose of running a Youth Challenge Camp in October 2002. The sponsorship cheque was formally presented by SGIO to the Mayor on 31 July 2002 at a morning tea function in the Civic Centre.

Detail

As a result of receiving sponsorship for $3,575.00, Council is required to expend these funds on transport, fuel, food, accommodation and challenge camp activities for between 17-20 young people and staff on the camp.

The Youth Challenge Camp will target young people at risk of entering a cycle of offending and anti-social behaviour. It will offer intervention strategies aimed at building self-esteem, confidence and knowledge of alternative leisure skills over a period of 3 days on a bushwalking camp.

Comment

Community Services is required to establish a budget location reflecting sponsorship income and program activity expenditure for the following reasons:

1. To fulfil the terms of the sponsorship from SGIO.

2. To enable acquittal of the grant funds for the camp.

3. To assist responsible and accurate expenditure of Council and sponsorship funds for the program.

Statutory Compliance

A Council resolution is required to firstly seek authorisation of the proposed expenditure and secondly to endorse the necessary budget variation (as per Section 6.8 (1) [b] of the Local Government Act 1995).

Strategic Implications

The budget variation endorsing the Youth Challenge Camp project expenditure is consistent with the City’s strategic plan in the following areas:

“2.4 Support safe and secure communities.

2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity

2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The City has $3,575.00 in sponsorship from SGIO at its disposal for the purpose of conducting a youth project to benefit young people in the City of Wanneroo. This will cover food, transport, accommodation, challenge activities and fuel costs for the camp.

Council will offer in-kind support through venue hire for pre-camp and post-camp sessions, staff costs, publicity, promotions and printing. The Police Department and another community organisation will also offer in-kind support.

Council will offer in-kind support to the value of approximately $1,456.00 for the project.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Pursuant to Section 6.8 (1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure incurred as a result off obtaining a grant from SGIO; and

2. NOTES that the costs associated with providing the required services will require the following budget amendment:

COST CODE	FROM	TO	DESCRIPTION
51.80.88.898.1705.9006		$3,575.00	Contributions – Operating Activities
51.80.88.898.5131.9006	$3,575.00		Program Activities for provision of camp

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

20. Request For Budget Variation - Merriwa Financial Counselling Service

File Ref: 09066

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

File Name: AAReqmer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a budget variation to reflect a 15% increase in the annual funding level for the Merriwa Financial Counselling Service in 2002/03.

Background

The Department for Community Development has funded the City of Wanneroo to deliver the Merriwa Financial Counselling Service over the past four (4) years. The current arrangement is for a 3-year Service Provider Agreement from October 2001-September 2004.

In July 2001 the State Homelessness Taskforce was established to develop a state response, including a practical plan of action, to address homelessness.

The report presented as a result was clear that the provision of affordable appropriate housing and support services to assist people in keeping their homes were two key factors in addressing homelessness.

Detail

Recommendation 2.1.7 of the report recommended an increase in the amount of financial counselling available to people at risk of homelessness through increasing debt. This additional funding has been sourced from the Rental Accommodation Fund and has been allocated to agencies such as the City of Wanneroo, which provide free financial counselling services in the community.

The City is expected to continue to provide annual audited financial statements and six-monthly progress reports to the funding body.

The State Government has committed to a 15% across the board increase for all departmentally funded financial counselling services. This includes Merriwa Financial Counselling. The 15% increase is represented in additional funds of $7,830.97.

Comment

The provision of financial counselling services is an important plank in community services offered by the City. There has been increasing demand on the City’s services over time, and as a result resources are stretched. The additional funds are a very welcome and sorely needed boost to available resources, and will allow the City to better meet the needs of residents in financial difficulty.

As a result it is recommended that the City accept the 15% increase in funding for the Merriwa Financial Counselling Service offered by the Department for Community Development. In order to do so a budget variation is required.

Extra requirements for reporting can be folded into the regular data collection and report writing already undertaken by Financial Counselling staff without requiring additional resources.

Statutory Compliance

A Council resolution is required to seek authorisation for the necessary budget variation (as per Section 6.8 (1) [b] of the Local Government Act 1995)

Strategic Implications

The acceptance of increased funding for the Merriwa Financial Counselling Service is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan in the following areas:

“2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future

2.4 Support safe and secure communities

2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity

2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Council has received a cheque for $7,830.97 that represents an increase of 15% in funding for the Merriwa Financial Counselling Service in 2002/03.

Last financial year the City received a total of $49,762.83 in funding for this program.

The City has a budgeted contribution in 2002/2003 of $70,030.00.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Section 6.8 (1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure incurred as a result off obtaining a 15% increase in funding for Merriwa Financial Counselling Service; and

2. NOTES that the costs associated with providing the required services will require the following budget amendment:

COST CODE	FROM	TO	DESCRIPTION
51.80.88.901.1501.0001		$7,830.97	Operating Activities Grant
51.80.88.901.5131.0001	$3,575.00		Program Activities

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

21. Broadview Park Toilet Building

File Ref: PR17/0003V01

File Name: BABroPar.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider concept documentation for the proposed construction of a public toilet block on Reserve 45942, Broadview Park in Landsdale.

Background

Broadview Park in Landsdale is a passive reserve available for community use. It is equipped with playground equipment, barbeques, a lake and gazebo. The park is often utilised for community events, birthday parties and weddings. The City promotes the use of this area for these types of functions, however there are currently no toilet amenities provided to service patrons.

In the past, limited access to toilet facilities has been provided by the nearby shopping centre. This arrangement however is not suitable because of size restrictions and Health and Safety considerations.

There are currently limited passive Parks within the City of Wanneroo that can cater for similar community activities.

Detail

Administration has developed a concept design for the construction of a proposed toilet facility on this location (as shown at Attachment 1 and Attachment 2).

The design for the toilet block incorporates a 9.47 metre by 6.11 metre brick construction. It will consist of one male, one female and one disabled toilet as shown in Attachment 3.

The City will be responsible for the ongoing cleaning and maintenance of the facility.

Council elected to support the construction of this toilet block in the 2002/2003 budget and has allocated $126 000 towards the project.

Consultation

Standard community consultation processes will be factored into the Development Approval application process associated with this proposed initiative.

Comment

Council administration considers that the toilet block concept meets the requirements of the existing and potential users of Broadview Park.

Currently the City actively promotes social gatherings at Broadview and has used the park for its own special events. In view of the fact that the neighbouring toilets can no longer be used correspondence has been received from the owners of the shopping centre and the general public requesting toilets from the City.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The provision of toilet blocks on designated passive reserves achieves Council’s Strategic Objective 2.6 “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Council has endorsed a budget allocation of $126,000.00 towards the project within the adopted 2002/03 Council budgetary processes.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council: -

1. AGREES in principle to the proposed toilet block at Reserve 45942 Broadview Park Landsdale (as outlined in attachments 1,2 and 3).

2. AUTHORISES the preparation of documentation and calling of quotations for construction of this toilet block.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Attachment 1

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

22. Waiver Of Entry Fees For Entry To The Gloucester Lodge Museum On Sunday October 6 2002

File Ref: PA9/0002V01

File Name: DAWavofe.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Ian Stone Date 19 August 2002

Level 3 Approval by Ian Stone Date 16 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by Ian Stone Date 16 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Ian Stone Date 16 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider waiving the admission fee for entry to the Gloucester Lodge Museum on Sunday 6 October 2002, the day of the Gloucester Lodge Museum Open Day.

Background

The Gloucester Lodge Museum Open Day is on Sunday 6 October 2002. It has been previous practice to waive the admission fee for entry to the Museum on the Museum Open Day and allow visitors to make a gold coin donation if they wish.

Detail

Spring Fest, the Gloucester Lodge Museum Open Day, is on Sunday 6 October. A number of displays will be set up and activities held in the grounds in front of the Museum. To encourage the community to view the displays inside the Museum it is proposed admission fees be waived for this day and the community have the opportunity to support the Museum by making a gold coin donation instead.

Consultation

The Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee supports the waiver of the Museum admission fees for this event.

Comment

Apart from the Yanchep National Park admission fee charged by CALM, the events and activities planned for the Open Day are being provided free of charge to the community. Waiving the admission fee would help this community event by encouraging visitors to the Museum who might not otherwise enter the building.

Statutory Compliance

Under section 6.12 (1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995, Council may waive or grant concessions in relation to any amount of money.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The admission fees for 2002-2003 have been set at $2.50 for adults and $1.50 for children and pensioners. No data is available on the number of people who visited the Museum on previous Open Days so it is difficult to estimate the potential revenue foregone. The target for this year is 1,000 visitors to the Museum, which could include multiple visits by the same person. It could be expected the revenue from a reduction in admission fee receipts would be balanced by an increase in donations received so it is expected the proposal will be largely revenue neutral.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the waiver of admission fees for entry to the Gloucester Lodge Museum on Sunday 6 October 2002 for the purpose of encouraging visitors to the Museum during the Museum Open Day.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

23. Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee

File Ref: s/0068vo1

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments 2

File Name: EAWanTow.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by Ross Rayson Date 15 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Ross Rayson Date 15 August 2002

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider revised terms of reference for the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee and identification of key Townsite projects for the 2002/2003 financial year.

Background

The Wanneroo Town Centre, given its location and key associations with the development of the City, is generally recognised as a focal point of local, district and regional significance.

The Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee is currently the Council Committee responsible for considering and making recommendations on issues and projects directly related to the Town Centre and its further development. This Committee has been operating under terms of reference that have now been reviewed to ensure that they remain relevant to the committee’s purpose.

Detail

Given the background information provided above, it is suggested that the principle role of the Advisory Committee remain as making recommendations to Council on matters pertaining to development within the Townsite. The duties of the Committee are suggested to be project based, with a number of projects identified on a financial year basis according to identified need. The revised Terms of Reference are included as Attachment 1. No change is proposed to the Committee Membership except the inclusion of the Director Community Development.

During the 2002/03 financial year, a number of projects have been identified for the Committee including:

· The development of a Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan

· The development of a proposed entry statement for the Town Centre

· The identification of opportunities arising from the proposed Wanneroo Shopping Centre redevelopment

· The assessment of the need and requirements for a special needs playground in the town centre.

The Community Development Directorate has initiated the first of these projects, the Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan, in order to examine facilities within the area and their compatibility with local and district social and cultural needs.

The study will aim, with guidance from the Advisory Committee, to:

· Determine local residents’ community and social needs, with a specific focus on the needs of young people and the arts and cultural community.

· Determine the City’s needs to cater for significant events, activities and programmes that are identified as being most appropriately provided within the Wanneroo townsite.

· Assess identified needs against existing facilities in terms of appropriate locations, capabilities, and suitability for identified use.

· To recommend to Council a community facilities plan for the Wanneroo townsite that details and prioritises:

o Redevelopment of existing facilities to cater for identified needs

o Connectivity issues within the townsite.

o Any new facilities required.

o Exploration of management options

It is anticipated that aims and objectives for other projects listed will be identified throughout the year and reported to Council.

Consultation

Each of the projects guided by this Committee over the current financial year will include community consultation strategies ratified under the City’s Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy.

The consultation strategy designed for the Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan is aimed at providing all stakeholders and residents of the Townsite area with a number of appropriate avenues to provide comment and input.

It will proceed as a two stage process where:

1. Residents and stakeholders will be introduced to the concept of townsite community facility planning and provided with the opportunity to articulate their needs.

2. Residents and stakeholders will be presented with a series of concept plans for the site and provided with a further opportunity to comment on the “match” between their needs and the concepts proposed.

Consultation will be both general and targeted, including a range of methods designed to elicit maximum response through appropriate tailored techniques.

The City’s Community Consultation Review Panel has ratified this strategy, in accordance with the provisions for the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy.

Further detail regarding the Consultation Strategy for this project is included as Attachment 2.

Comment

Given the need for a Council Committee to be involved and guide the future development of the Wanneroo townsite, it is recommended that Council adopt the revised terms of reference for the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee.

A list of identified projects guided by the Committee will assist Council in making informed decisions regarding future development and identify possible opportunities for the integration of community and commercial development.

The first project of the Committee, being the Wanneroo Townsite Facility Plan, will provide Council with a clear direction to cater for current and future community and social needs of the area.

The community consultation strategy proposed for the development of this plan maximises opportunities for resident and key stakeholder input. It suggests a range of methods to establish community need and move towards a partnership based approach to the re-development of the Townsite.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The existence of the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee and its focus on key projects for this area is in line with Council’s commitment to Healthy Communities and the importance of community consultation.

The Wanneroo Townsite Facility Plan has been identified as a strategic project to be completed by the City’s Community Development Directorate. Whilst this project was originally identified for completion in the 2004/05 financial year, the high level of need in this area, and the impending redevelopment of the shopping precinct, has moved forward the timing to the current financial year.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

It is anticipated that community consultation and concept plan work associated with the completion of the Town Centre Advisory Committee’s projects in 2002/2003 will require a small budgetary allocation, which will be accommodated in existing budgets of the Community Development Directorate.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council

1. ENDORSES the revised terms of reference for the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee as follows:

Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee

Terms of Reference

Role

To make recommendations to council on matters pertaining to the Wanneroo Town Site.

Membership

Mayor

Wanneroo Ward Councillors (2)

Chief Executive Officer

Director Technical Services

Director Planning and Development

Director Community Development

Term of Office

Ongoing

Sub Committees

Subcommittees may be formed from time to time to work on specific projects, activities or issues.

Sub-committee membership will be by a committee based nomination process.

All active sub-committees shall make reports to the Committee at each official meeting.

Chairperson

To be elected from the endorsed committee members.

Meeting Frequency

A minimum of 4 meetings per year with notice of at least two weeks.

Quorum

A Quorum will be a simple majority.

Minutes

Minutes shall be made of all meetings and forwarded to members within seven days of the meeting taking place. All other Councillors will receive Minutes of Committee meetings via the Councillor Clipboard. Any recommendations requiring a Council decision will be presented as an official report to Council for consideration.

Delegated Authority

None

Deputations

The Committee may invite any persons or organisations to attend any meetings to discuss issues of interest.

Budget

Nil

Scope

To advise and make recommendations to Council on matters relating to the Wanneroo townsite.

Develop policies in relation to management of facilities within the townsite.

To make recommendations on constructing or upgrading facilities within the townsite.

To provide comment and advise on research conducted by administration for projects specific to the townsite.

Definitions

The Wanneroo Townsite will be defined as all facilities and amenities located within one kilometre of the Wanneroo Post Office.

2. In accordance with revised Terms of Reference, APPOINTS by Absolute Majority, Director Community Development to the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee.

3. NOTES that the Town Centre Advisory Committee will oversee and make recommendations to Council on the following projects in the 2002/2003 financial year:

- The development of a Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan

- The development of a proposed entry statement for the Town Centre

- The identification of opportunities arising from the proposed Wanneroo Shopping Centre redevelopment

- The assessment of the need and requirements for a special needs playground in the Town Centre

4. NOTES that the Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan project will commence in September 2002

5. ENDORSES the community consultation strategy associated with the Wanneroo Townsite Community Facility Plan including:

- General consultation with residents of the Townsite, including a series of public meetings throughout the duration of the project and an interactive shopping centre display and notice board

- Targeted consultation with key stakeholder groups, including young people, the arts and cultural community and tenants of existing community facilities

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

ATTACHMENT 1,

PAGE 1 OF 2

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee

Terms of Reference

Role

To make recommendations to council on matters pertaining to the Wanneroo Town Site.

Membership

Mayor

Wanneroo Ward Councillors (2)

Chief Executive Officer

Director Technical Services

Director Planning and Development

Director Community Development

Term of Office

Ongoing

Sub Committees

Subcommittees may be formed from time to time to work on specific projects, activities or issues.

Sub-committee membership will be by a committee based nomination process.

All active sub-committees shall make reports to the Committee at each official meeting.

Chairperson

To be elected from the endorsed committee members.

Meeting Frequency

A minimum of 4 meetings per year with notice of at least two weeks.

Quorum

A Quorum will be a simple majority.

Minutes

Delegated Authority

None

ATTACHMENT 1,

PAGE 2 OF 2

Deputations

The Committee may invite any persons or organisations to attend any meetings to discuss issues of interest.

Budget

Nil

Scope

To advise and make recommendations to Council on matters relating to the Wanneroo townsite.

Develop policies in relation to management of facilities within the townsite.

To make recommendations on constructing or upgrading facilities within the townsite.

To provide comment and advise on research conducted by administration for projects specific to the townsite.

Definitions

The Wanneroo Townsite will be defined as all facilities and amenities located within one kilometre of the Wanneroo Post Office

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2,

PAGE 1 OF 2

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Consultation Strategy-Wanneroo Townsite Facility Plan

It will proceed as a two stage process where:

3. Residents and stakeholders will be introduced to the concept of townsite community facility planning and provided with the opportunity to articulate their needs.

4. Residents and stakeholders will be presented with a series of concept plans for the site and provided with a further opportunity to comment on the “match” between their needs and the concepts proposed.

Consultation will be both general and targeted, including a range of methods designed to elicit maximum response through appropriate tailored techniques.

General Consultation

General consultation undertaken as part of the study will be aimed at residents of the townsite area.

It will include:

· Advertisement in the newspaper introducing the study and inviting submissions.

· Public meeting to introduce the study and gain initial input.

· Development of concept plans utilising input.

· Second public meeting for residents to view concept plans and provide comment.

These methods will be complimented by the use of a changing interactive display at the Wanneroo Shopping Centre, which will keep residents up to date with the progress of the study and allow further input.

Targeted Consultation

Targeted consultation is necessary to allow for more in depth work with both identified groups and tenants of present facilities. Focus groups will follow the general two stage consultation procedure noted above, with specific activities or methods detailed below.

Young People

The aim of this group is to identify their needs within the townsite. It is proposed that Youth Services will take control of the Young People Focus Group. To open the discussion, it is planned that the youth will have the opportunity to take photos around Wanneroo. These photos will address issues such as “What places make you feel safe?”

Arts & Culture

This group will be formed to meet the objective of identifying cultural needs within the community.

ATTACHMENT 2,

PAGE 2 OF 2

The Arts & Culture group will include organisations (but not be limited to) such as Limelight Theatre, Wanneroo Art Society, Wanneroo Pastel Society and Wanneroo Woodturners. These groups have an artistic base and are not tenants, with the exception of The Limelight Theatre that has a 21-year lease on their building. Most of these groups would be potential new tenants.

Tenants Group

The aim of the tenants group is to establish what their unmet needs are and to keep them up to date with the progress of the study. All existing tenants will be included in this group. They will include (but not limited to) The Wanneroo Agriculture Society, Historical Society, Ruby Benjamin, Toy Library, Wanneroo Recreation Centre tenants, City Entertainers and Harmony Singers.

Written Invitations

Other stakeholders identified as part of the study will also be consulted through a written invitation to comment. These groups will be mainly those who are not included in the focus study groups but are key stakeholders in the project. The invitation will include a short questionnaire that will cover what type of facilities that are available, how many hours they are used/vacant and what are their unmet needs, as well as inviting their input at the scheduled public meetings.

The City’s Community Consultation Review Panel has ratified this strategy, in accordance with the provisions for the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

24. Submission on the Review of The Dog Act 1976 Issues Paper

File Ref: S21/0008V01

File Name: CASubont.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Kelly Edmonds on behalf of Fiona Bentley Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by Kelly Edmonds on behalf of Mike Barry Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Kelly Edmonds Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Director Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a submission to the Department of Local Government as part of the review of the Dog Act 1976.

Background

Over one third of households in Australia have a dog. The effect of this is that most people will either live on or near premises where a dog is kept.

The Dog Act 1976 was drafted in an attempt to achieve a balance between the sometimes conflicting principles that people should be entitled to own and enjoy dogs and the need for adequate control of dogs. The provisions of the Act therefore aimed to preserve the right of ownership of dogs whilst at the same time placing a measure of responsibility on those who chose to be owners.

Since the initial drafting of the Dog Act 1976 several amendments have been made including giving local governments the power to deal with dangerous dogs and more recently legislation relating to Dog (Restricted Breeds) Regulation 2002.

Detail

The submission to be provided to the Department for Local Government and Regional Development for consideration as part of the process of the review of the Dog Act has been prepared by Council’s Administration. The submission is required to be forwarded to the Department of Local Government and Regional Development by Monday, 2 September 2002. An extension has been requested and granted to allow for the submission to be presented to Council for endorsement on 3 September 2002. The submission is detailed in the Recommendation to Council. The submission was prepared following workshops with Management, Rangers and Administration within the Community Development Directorate, taking into consideration an in depth study of the issues paper published by the Department of Local Government and Regional Development .

Consultation

The Department of Local Government have advised that the Issues Paper is the first step in the review of the Dog Act 1976 that will span six months. There will be a ten week public consultation period, a series of workshops and open public forums that will also form a significant part of the review.

Comment

The submission covers the following broad areas:

Administration

The principal types of matters that appear to be of concern in relation to the administration of the Act relate to the exercise of power outside districts, joint jurisdiction and the entry of premises. These concerns are generally held by authorised persons and other individuals responsible for the administration of the Act. It is recognised that the matter relating to the entry of premises is likely to become a significant issue where a house is entered. These issues are addressed in item 3.2 of the submission.

Registration

The main issues of concern in regard to registration appear to relate to the setting up of a central register of dogs; the limiting of access to specified information on registers; the introduction of a rolling 12 month registration period; and microchipping. All of these matters have been raised by local governments in pursuit of their role in administering and enforcing the Act. However, individual dog owners have also raised concerns regarding access to information on registers.

Other matters relating to registration including those issues relating to enforcement, sterilised dogs, guard dogs and guide dogs. These issues are addressed in item 3.3 of the submission.

Keeping of Dogs

The purpose of this section of the Act is to preserve an individual’s right to own a dog or dogs while also allowing local governments to control the number and types of dogs that can be owned. The principal concerns raised in relation to the keeping of dogs relate to the enforcement of limited numbers of dogs. Concerns have also been raised in relation to the wording, interpretation and application of this section. Both local governments and the public have raised issues relating to the number of dogs allowed. These issues are addressed in item 3.4 of the submission.

Control of Dogs

The principle types of matters that appear to be of concern in relation to control of dogs relate to the seizing of dogs, the control of dogs in public places, dog attacks and barking dogs. The latter matter is by far the most significant in terms of the degree of emotion and pent up frustration that it engenders.

Some other matters that have been raised relate to destruction of dogs found attacking wildlife, people being directed to provide certain health-related care for their dogs and the microchipping of dangerous dogs.

The seizing of dogs, the protection of wildlife, dog welfare and the identification of dangerous dogs are matters that are primarily raised by authorised persons and the RSPCA. The other matters relating to the control of dogs in public places and barking dogs are issues generally raised by members of the public. These issues are addressed in item 3.5 of the submission.

Enforcement

The enforcement of provisions within the Dog Act 1976 has been an issue of concern to a cross section of individuals effected by or administering the Act. While there appear to be issues specifically associated with this part of the Act, there are widespread concerns as to the practical enforcement of other sections of the Act. The primary issue seems to be the use of the court system as a means of enforcing provisions of the Act. In many instances it appears that a local government may be reluctant to act on a complaint if it is felt that the claim may not stand up in court. Consequently, it has been argued that many potential offences go unchecked or unpenalised. These issues are addressed in item 3.6 of the submission.

Civil Remedies

The principal issues raised in this section relate to the process of awarding damages in relation to dog attacks and whether modified penalties should apply to a person who wilfully causes harm to a dog. These issues have been raised by local governments and by individuals seeking compensation resulting from dog attacks. These issues are addressed in item 3.7 of the submission.

Local Laws

The principal types of matters that appear to be of concern in regard to local laws are those relating to modified penalties and to fees and charges. Other matters relate to the number and/or type of dog being kept in flats or units and the practice adopted by some local governments when specifying places from which dogs are prohibited. These issues are addressed in item 3.8 of the submission.

Regulations

The only regulations which currently exist under the provisions relating to certain kinds of dogs are the Dog (Restricted Breed) Regulations 2002 which were gazetted in March 2002. These regulations apply provisions similar to those currently imposed on dogs declared dangerous to those breeds of dog prohibited from importation under Commonwealth legislation. They are to expire at the end of a twelve-month trial period unless amended to ensure their continuation. Under the legislation, a “restricted breed dog” is defined as a breed whose importation into Australia is prohibited under the Commonwealth Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956. These issues are addressed in item 3.9 of the submission.

Other

The principal types of matters that appear to be of concern in relation to dog behaviour and the relationship of these animals to their owners are issues that have generally been raised by people who take both the training and socialisation of their dogs very seriously. These people are invariably representatives of, or members of, a dog club.

Another issue that is discussed here relates to dingoes and appears to be generally of more concern to government agencies that bear some responsibility for them. However, a few individuals have also expressed a particular interest in this issue.

In addition to the above issues, one of Council’s contracted Solicitors has provided general comments on the Dog Act 1976 and the relevant issues have also been included in the submission. These issues are addressed in item 3.10 of the submission.

Statutory Compliance

This submission formulated in relation to the review of the Dog Act 1976 will contribute to the Cities goal of Healthy Communities in improving effective dog control and customer service.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ENDORSES the submission to be provided to the Department of Local Government for consideration as part of the review of the Dog Act 1976.

SUBMISSION

ON THE REVIEW OF THE DOG ACT 1976

ISSUE PAPER

AUGUST 2002

3.0 ISSUES

3.2.1 Interpretations

Should the definition of “premises” be extended to include boats, caravan, vehicles and sheds? Should any other types of property be included?

The definition should be extended to include boats, caravans, vehicles, and sheds and any other construction/means of confining a dog

Should any other terms be included or amended to assist in the interpretation of the Act?

3.1.2.2 Application of the legislation

Should prison dogs be excluded from the Act?

Prison dogs should be excluded from the Act along with any government agency dogs.

3.1.2.3 Dogs to be registered

Should an authorised person be given the power to seize a dog if it has not been registered?

An authorised person should be given the power to seize a dog if it has not been registered with a warrant with powers to enter such buildings as necessary.

Should the registration requirements be changed to recognise the current veterinary practice of not sterilising dogs until they are at least 6 months old? If so, how should these registration requirements be changed?

The registration requirements should not be changed to recognise the current veterinary practice of not sterilising dog until they are at least 6 months old because a Ranger is not able to easily identify the age of a dog at 6 months. A Ranger is able to easily determine the age of a dog at 3 months.

Should provision be made for dogs to be registered over the internet? If so, what difficulties, if any would be envisaged?

The provision should not be made for dogs to be registered over the internet because there is a requirement for a declaration to be signed. The declaration confirms the owner of the dog is over the age of 18 years and there are means on the premises to contain the dog. There is a requirement to see proof that a dog has been sterilised by either a sterilisation certificate, statutory declaration or ear tattoo. There is also a requirement for proof of pension.

Should guard dogs be separately registered?

Guard dogs should not be registered separately as it would be difficult to administer.

Should an authorised person be required, or given the discretion, to inspect the premises where guard dogs are kept?

An authorised person should be given the discretion to inspect the premises where guard dogs are kept to ensure there is compliance with the conditions for a dangerous dog.

Should the Act and/or regulations include specific provisions relating to the keeping, locating and training of guard dogs?

The Act and/or regulations should not include specific provisions relating to the keeping, locating and training of guard dogs as the onus is on the owner of the dog and any issues would be a civil matter.

Are there any other provisions necessary for the control of guard dogs?

There are no other provisions necessary, as they would be covered as a dangerous dog with the specified conditions.

Should the provisions that allow visually impaired persons to use guide dogs be expanded to include people with disabilities without first having to obtain the Minister’s approval?

This question should be referred to the disability agencies for comment.

3.2 ADMINISTRATION

3.2.1 Content

3.2.2.1 Application of Powers Outside District

Should a general provision be provided which enables an authorised person to enforce the Act in an area that is not within the district but which adjoins that person’s district?

A general provision should be provided which enables an authorised person to enforce the Act in an area that is not within a district but which adjoins that person’s district.

Should an authorised person, where there is no agreement between local governments, be able to both pursue and investigate an incident where the dog moves into a neighbouring local government district? Should an authorised person be able to pursue and investigate an incident in any district that is not necessarily a neighbouring district?

An authorised person should be able to both pursue and investigate an incident in any district that is not necessarily a neighbouring district.

3.2.2.3 Entry of premises

Should an authorised person or police officer be able to enter any premises for the purposes of seizing an unregistered dog?

An authorised person should be given the power to enter any premises and seize an unregistered dog with a warrant with the powers to enter such buildings as necessary.

Should an authorised person or police officer be able to enter any premises for the purposes of seizing or rescuing an abandoned, sick or injured dog?

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Inc) officers have the authority to enter any premises for the purposes of seizing or rescuing an abandoned, sick or injured dog and this should continue to be dealt with under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Are there any other situations in which an authorised person or police officer should have the right of entry (with or without a warrant) to undertake some action involving a dog eg seizing a dog which is causing a nuisance by bark?

The following are situations where an authorised person should have the right of entry without a warrant:

When a dog is attacking a person or animal at that time

The following are situations where an authorised person should have the right of entry with a warrant:

More than two dogs without permission
Any other contravention identified in the Dog Act

3.3 REGISTRATION

3.3.2.1 Register to be maintained

Should a central authority be established to undertake the registration of all dogs in Western Australia?

A central authority to undertake the registration of all dogs in Western Australia should not be established because the local authority would be enforcing the registration of dogs without the administrative and operational control. Local authorities are able to ascertain change of addresses through their individual rates systems and residents are more likely to register their dog with their local authority.

Should a single database be established for the storing and manipulation of all information relating to dog registrations in Western Australia?

A single database should not be established for the storing and manipulation of all information relating to dog registrations in Western Australia because the local authority would be enforcing the registration of dogs without the control of the data. Local authorities are able to ascertain change of addresses through their individual rates systems and residents are more likely to register their dog with their local authority.

What limitations, if any, should be placed on non authorised persons gaining access to dog registers?

Non authorised persons should not have any access to dog registers.

What information should not be publicly available?

No information should be publicly available.

Should general public access to dog registers be denied and should any specific inquiry be dealt with under freedom of information legislation?

General pubic access to dog registers should be denied and specific inquiries should be dealt with under the freedom of information legislation by the completion of the application form and payment of the specified fee.

3.3.2.2 Registration periods and fees

Should registrations be for a twelve month (or three year) period as from the date of registration?

The twelve month (or three year) registration period should commence from the date of registration as this would be more efficient administratively and fairer for the dog owner.

Should registration fees be set by local governments for the express purpose of encouraging good dog management practices?

Registration fees should not be set by local governments as there should be consistency across all local governments.

Should registration fees continue to be set by regulations but provide for the encouragement of good dog management practices (eg owners pay concessional registration fee where they and/or their dog pass an accredited course)?

Registration fees should continue to be set by regulations. The encouragement of good dog management practices should be handled by the individual local authorities but should not be associated with the registration fee. There are dog owners that are capable of good dog management practices without having to pass an accredited course.

Do registration fees adequately cover the cost of registering a dog?

The registration fees probably do not cover the cost of registering a dog but the local authorities are providing a community service to its residents. The registration fee structure should be reviewed every five years.

3.3.2.3 Registration procedure

Does the meaning of “effective confinement” need to be further defined so as to remove any ambiguity? If so, how should it be defined?

The meaning of “effective confinement” does not need to be further defined because the penalty for 31(3) - $100.00 covers this situation.

Should minimum specifications for any fencing or enclosure be included in the Act or regulations?

There should not be a minimum specification for any fencing or enclosure included in the Act because of the different requirements for a rural and residential property.

3.3.2.4 Registration tags

Should all dogs be required to be implanted with microchips?

All dogs should not be required to be implanted with microchips, it should be the owners prerogative.

Should microchips replace tags or should they be used in association with each other?

Microchips should not replace tags as it would be a difficult method of control and microchips should be used as an added identification at the owners discretion.

3.4 KEEPING OF DOGS

3.4.2.1 Limitation as to numbers

Should the Dog Act 1976 be amended to all local governments to delegate certain powers?

It would be administratively prudent for the Dog Act to be amended to all local governments to delegate certain powers.

Who should have a right of appeal where a decision regarding the keeping of a dog above the prescribed limit is made by a local government?

Any person who is aggrieved should have a right of appeal where a decision regarding the keeping of a dog above the prescribed limit is made by a local government.

Should the Act provide for residents in the locality to be advised of any application that has been made to keep more than the prescribed number of dogs and informed that they may make a submission on the proposal?

The Act should provide for the adjoining property owners to be advised of any application that has been made to keep more than the prescribed number of dogs and informed that they may make a submission on the proposal.

Should objection and appeal rights similar to those provided for in the Local Government Act 1995 be provided for in the Dog Act 1976?

Objection and appeal rights should be similar to those provided for in the Local Government Act 1995.

3.4.2.2 Licensing of approved kennel establishments

Are there any issues that need to be considered in relation to the establishment of kennels?

There are no issues that need to be considered in relation to the establishment of kennels as this is covered in the planning and approval process and Council Local Laws.

3.5 CONTROL OF DOGS

3.5.2.1 Power to seize dogs

Should an unregistered dog be able to be seized from any premises? Should this be able to be done without a warrant?

An unregistered dog should be able to be seized from any premises with a warrant with the powers to enter such buildings as necessary.

Should abandoned, sick or injured dogs be able to be seized or rescued from premises by an authorised person or police officer? Should this be able to be done without a warrant?

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Inc) officers have the authority to enter any premises for the purposes of seizing or rescuing an abandoned, sick or injured dog and should be dealt with under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Should an authorised person or police officer be able to seize a dog, that is believed to have been involved in an attack, from premises without a court order or warrant even though they have not been in pursuit of the animal?

An authorised person or police officer should be able to seize a dog that is believed to be attacking a person or animal without a court order or warrant even though they have not been in pursuit of an animal.

The following are situations where an authorised person should have the right of entry with a warrant to undertake some action involving a dog:

More than two dogs without permission
Any other contravention identified in the Dog Act

Should the minimum 72 hour (3 day) period during which a local government must keep and maintain an impounded dog be increased? What would be an appropriate minimum period?

The minimum 72 hour (3 day) period during which a local government must keep and maintain an impounded dog should be increased to five days.

3.5.2.2 Collars and registration tags

Should provision be made for allowing a name and/or address to be left off collars?

The provision of a name and/or address should be left off collars. This should be at the discretion of the dog owner due to confidentiality issues.

Should the name/and or address be substituted with a coded symbol?

There is no reason for the name/and or address to be substituted with a coded symbol as the colour and registration tag number identifies the dog owner.

3.5.2.3 Control of dogs in certain public places

Should the Act, while providing for tethering in a public place, specify the circumstances and conditions under which tethering can occur?

There should be no provision for tethering in a public place as this is an unsafe practice.

Should tethering be banned in public places such as at the entrance to shops or other business?

The provision for tethering in a public place such as at the entrance to shops or other business should be banned as this is an unsafe practice.

What other dog control provisions should be provided for in public places?

There are no additional dog control provisions that should be provided for in a public place other than the conditions already stipulated in the Act.

3.5.2.4 Dog attacks

Are the defences in the Act in relation to dog attacks adequate? Should other defences be included?

Provocation of the dog should be a defence that is included in the Act in relation to dog attacks.

Should a dog attack on wildlife be included in the Act as an offence?

Dog attack on wildlife should be included in the Act as an offence.

Should any defences be removed?

No defences should be removed.

3.5.2.5 Nuisance dogs eg injurious or dangerous to health, nuisance barking etc

How should the definition of a barking nuisance be defined to make the provisions more effective in dealing with these types of complaints?

The definition of a barking nuisance should be defined as follows:

Dogs may not engage in unreasonable howling and/or barking or other noise, audible beyond the property line of the property where the dog is harboured, that disturbs or annoys any person of reasonable sensitivities other than the person owning or harbouring such dog.

Habitual howling or barking is defined as:

a) Continuous howling and/or barking for ten minutes or more in any one hour

b) Ten or more instances of howling and/or barking, each instance lasting in duration for one minute or more, in any one hour.

What type of evidence should be required for successful action to be taken against the owner of a dog that is being a nuisance by barking?

The following evidence should be required for successful action to be taken against the owner of a dog that is being a nuisance by barking:

Signed and witnessed statutory declarations to commence an investigation
Complaints from two persons from different addresses
Completion of diaries
Tape recordings
Compulsory mediation between complainants and dog owner prior to any prosecution

Should a complaint of one person be sufficient to enable a local government to take action against an owner of a dog that is being a nuisance by barking?

A complaint of one person is not sufficient to enable a local government to take action against an owner of a dog that is being a nuisance by barking unless it is supported by independent evidence.

Should a local government be required to monitor the frequency and intensity of noise created by a dog that is suspected of creating a nuisance by barking? That is, should this type of noise be dealt with in much the same way as other noise that might be created by sound systems or machinery.

The onus is on the complainants to monitor the frequency and intensity of noise created by a dog that is suspected of creating a nuisance by barking.

What would be the best way to separate vindictive complaints from genuine nuisance dog barking complaints?

Obtaining the following evidence would be the best way to separate vindictive complaints from genuine nuisance dog barking complaints:

Signed and witnessed statutory declarations to commence an investigation
Complaints from two persons from different addresses
Completion of diaries
Tape recordings
Compulsory mediation between complainants and dog owner prior to any prosecution

Is there a role for a code of practice in dealing with a barking nuisance? If so, how would this assist and what would it contain?

If the definition of habitual barking could be ratified by the Courts, there would not be a role for a code of practice in dealing with a barking nuisance.

What other amendments could be made to the legislation relating to nuisance barking to make it more effective?

The following amendments could be make to the legislation relating to nuisance barking to make it more effective:

The complainant is required to allow recording equipment to be placed at the premises
Supported independent evidence
Compulsory mediation between complainants and dog owner prior to any prosecution being instigated.

3.6 ENFORCEMENT

3.6.2.1 Destruction of dogs

Should local governments be required to follow a particular method for the destruction of dogs?

Local Governments should be required to use the most humane method available either injection or firearm for the destruction of dogs.

What method, or methods, should be used for the destruction of dogs?

Either injection or firearm should be the methods used for the destruction of dogs.

Should the Act provide that local governments, in consultation with the RSPCA or other appropriate authority, adopt a code of practice for the destruction of dogs?

The Act should not provide that local governments, in consultation with the RSPCA or other appropriate authority, adopt a code of practice for the destruction of dogs as local governments should use the most humane method available either injection or firearm.

3.6.2.2 Name and address to be supplied

Should a person who is alleged to have committed an offence against the Act be required to give their driver’s licence details or date of birth to an authorised person?

A person who is alleged to have committed an offence against the Act should be required to give their date of birth to an authorised person however this cannot legally be enforced as the authorised officer does not have powers of arrest.

3.6.2.3 Modified penalties (infringement notices)

Should modified penalties be able to be applied to dog attack offences?

Modified penalties should be able to be applied to minor dog attacks.

Where a conviction is made by a court should the judge or magistrate be required to at least apply a penalty equivalent to the modified penalty which applies to the same offence.

A judge or magistrate should be required to at least apply a penalty equivalent to the modified penalty, which applies to the same offence where a conviction is made by a court for consistency.

3.7 CIVIL REMEDIES ETC

3.7.2.2 Damages

Should modified penalties apply to a person who wilfully causes harm to a dog?

A modified penalty should apply to a person who wilfully causes harm to a dog in minor cases. In severe cases the matter should be referred to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Inc) and dealt with under the Cruelty to Animals Act.

Should a dog’s registration be revoked if the owner is found to have wilfully caused it harm?

A dog’s registration should only be revoked at the request of the RSPCA Inc if the owner is found to have wilfully caused a dog harm.

Should the Act provide for a person who has been convicted of being cruel to a dog be banned from owning or keeping a dog for some specified period.

The Royal Society for Prevention to Cruelty to Animals (Inc) should maintain a register of persons that have been convicted of being cruel to a dog, stipulate the period that the dog is to banned from owning or kept a dog and regularly advise local authorities.

Should this provision be extended to include a person who causes harm to a dog through mismanagement or irresponsible behaviour?

The Royal Society for Prevention to Cruelty to Animals Inc should determine and maintain a register of persons that have caused harm to a dog through mismanagement or irresponsible behaviour and regularly advise local authorities.

3.8 LOCAL LAWS

3.8.2.1 General provisions relating to local laws

Should the $2000 ceiling that applies to modified penalties be raised to provide a wider range of options in dealing with offences under local laws?

The ceiling that applies to modified penalties should be raised to $5,000 to provide a wider range of options in dealing with offences under local laws for habitual offenders.

Should the Act provide for fees and charges to be set by resolution of Council?

The Act should not provide for fees and charges to be set by resolution of Council so that there is consistency between local authorities.

Should the Act specify the types and number of dogs that may be kept in different sized housing?

The Act should not specify the types and number of dogs that may be kept in different sized housing as it would be operationally difficult to police.

3.8.2.2 Local law making powers

Should the requirements of the Act be tightened so that places, or classes of places, are adequately specified in local laws?

The requirements of the Act should be tightened so that places, or classes of places, are adequately specified in local laws for consistency purposes.

Should the requirements of the Act relating to places be relaxed to avoid the difficulties that some local governments experience in specifying particular areas or places?

The requirements of the Act relating to places should not be relaxed because it would hamper effective enforcement and lack of consistency.

3.9 REGULATIONS

3.9.2.1 Regulations as to certain kinds of dog

How should the restricted breed dogs be identified?

There is a lack of understanding or substantiated evidence as to why the specified breed of dogs have been restricted breed dogs as opposed to other dogs

Should the restricted breed regulations be continued as is or modified in any way?

May need to be reviewed because it is presently related to the Commonwealth Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956.

What breeds of dog should be restricted?

Extensive research and consultation will need to be undertaken to determine which breeds of dogs should be restricted.

Should the Act provide for restricted breed dogs to be declared dangerous so that the dangerous dog provisions apply to these breeds?

Restricted breed dogs should not be declared dangerous so that the dangerous dog provisions apply to these breeds.

3.10 OTHER

3.10.2.1 Licensing the dog owner

Should dog owners rather than their dogs be licensed?

Dog owners should not be licensed rather than their dogs because the offences relate specifically to the dog

Should incentives, such as dog registration fee concessions, be introduced to encourage dog owners to undertake dog training and other activities designed to produce better dog management practices.

What types of incentives, if any, should be provided to encourage good dog management practices?

Incentives to encourage good dog management practices should be the responsibility of the individual Council.

3.10.2.2 Minimum requirements for dogs

Should minimum housing and exercise requirements be provided for in the Act?

Minimum housing and exercise requirements should not be provided for in the Act as it would be difficult to determine and enforce.

Should minimum standards be set for the construction and operation of dog pounds?

Minimum standards for the construction of a pound are considered as part of the planning approval process but there should be minimum standards set for the operation of a dog pound.

3.10.2.3 Rewarding dog owners

Should a system be provided which rewards dog owners where their dog has been continuously well behaved?

Rewarding dog owners where their dog has been continuously well behaved should be the responsibility of the individual Council.

3.10.2.4 Dingoes

How should dingoes and dingo crosses be controlled in Western Australia?

Dingoes and dingo crosses should be controlled by the Western Australia Department of Agriculture

Should individuals be allowed to keep dingoes or dingo crosses?

The determination as to individuals being allowed to keep dingoes or dingo crosses should be by the Department of Agriculture

If dingoes are to be included in the Act how should they be defined give the difficulties in clearly identifying them?

Dingoes should not be included in the Act and should be the responsibility of the Agricultural Department.

3.10.2.5 Other

Are there any other matters or issues which have not been discussed in this Paper which you feel should be considered? If so, please provide details.

One of Council’s contracted solicitors has made the following comments in relation to the Dog Act 1976 generally, prior to the issue paper being distributed.

Delegation

The Act as it is presently provides for a “registration officer” (s3), an “authorised person” (s29) and an “employee” (s44). Section 33E provides a further class of delegation being a “person specifically authorised by the local government for the purposes of this section……”.

The powers of delegation similar to those which appear in Part 5 of the Local Government Act are appropriate.

It appears that there is an overlap between the power to appoint persons in (s11) of the Act and the power contained in (s449) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960. The appointment of a Ranger should be made under both sections.

If questions of indemnity for employees, contractors and members are to be addressed, the indemnity provisions in the Local Government Act contained at (s9.56) should be considered.

The present drafting of (s44) is unwieldy and should be simplified.

Registration

Dogs kept at kennel establishments should be registered individually.

The registration of a dog should only be done by the owner and not by an agent on behalf of an owner.

Dog Attack

The defence in (s33D(b)) could be used as a defence in aid of having the complaint dismissed, when in fact they are the person responsible for the dog at the time because the registered owner is not there.

The provision of a modified penalty for dog attack

The City has found that the following two registration issues appear not to be consistently interpreted by all local authorities and require clear explanations in the drafting of the Act:

Definition of a pensioner to be clearly defined in the Act

Clearly define the responsibility of a local government to maintain the registration until the expiry even if the dog has moved to another local authority

In addition the following two registration issues should be addressed to assist with administrative processes and the cost of the processes:

Refunds should only be issued in the first and second year of a three year registration if the dog has died or left the state, has been sterilised or the owner has become a pensioner

· Impose a fee for the issue of replacement registration tags

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Chief Executive Office

25. Lease Of A Photocopier - Strategic & Executive Services

File Ref: Print Room

File Name: CLeaofaP.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2002

Level 2 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2002

Level 1 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2002

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To authorise the lease of a suitable photocopier for Strategic & Executive Services.

Background

During the preparation and adoption of the 2002/03 Municipal Budget an allocation of $9,400 was approved under capital purchases for the purchase of a photocopier for the Strategic & Executive Services.

Detail

The reference to the purchase of the photocopier in the budget is incorrect as the proposal is to lease a second large capacity photocopier similar to the current unit used by Strategic and Executive Services.

The current unit is responsible for all bulk copying within the organisations including the Council agenda’s and minutes. When the unit was first purchased in 2000 its was designed to accommodate an annual copy rate of 1 million copies per annum. When ordered it was estimated that the rate of use of the copier when the organisation moved into the new Civic Centre would grow by no more than 20%.

In the last 18 months the unit has produced in excess of 2.2 million copies and is currently under pressure. The intention of the new initiatives submission to lease a second type unit which is capable of being tandem connected to the existing unit has the following advantages:

· Increase copying capacity.

· Ability to increase the rate of copying

· Provides a contingency if one unit fails

It is estimated based on the current contract the City holds with Fuji-Xerox Australia Pty Ltd that the annual lease fee will be in the vicinity of $7,000 to $9,000 per annum for a 5-year lease. Quotations will be sought prior to any lease being entered into.

Comment

Council’s Print Room has been well utilised by the organisation and provides a very cost effective means of producing bulk black and white copies.

It is believed that as the Council strives to increase community consultation and awareness of City services that the need and quantity of coping carried out will continue to increase.

Statutory Compliance

Section 6.8 (1) (b) of the Local Government Act 1995 states:

6.8 (1) A local government is not to incur expenditure from its municipal fund for an additional purpose except where the expenditure –

(b) is authorised in advance by resolution*;

*Absolute Majority required

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

It should be noted that the adopted budget for the current year has an allocation of $9,400 for the outright purchase of one small photocopier. The Officers recommendation seeks Council’s approval to enter into a lease arrangement for a large capacity unit with an estimated cost to Council over the 5-year period of up to $47,000. In comparison the cost of outright purchase of the unit is estimated to be in the vicinity of $35,000.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip – This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Section 6.8 (1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the expenditure to be incurred in leasing a photocopier for Strategic & Executive Services

2. NOTES that the cost associated with the lease of the photocopier is to be funded from the following budget amendment:

Cost Code	From	To	Description
Capital Requirements Project Number GC1	$9,400		Furniture & Equipment (Capital)
51.05.05.051.4520.0001		$9,400	Hire of Equipment – Photocopier lease and copy charges

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

26. Annual Review - City Of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register

File Ref: S09/0056V01

File Name: CAnnRevC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the review and adoption of the City of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register.

Background

Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on the 14 August 2001 resolved as follows:

“That Council:-

1. ADOPT by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Delegated Authority Register, as amended to reduce the amount which can be approved by the Chief Executive Officer from $100,000 to $50,000, the amendment to read as follows:-

2.1.9 AWARDING TENDERS

To delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to approve tenders less than or equal to $50,000 in value and to determine which expression will be invited to proceed to the tender stage.

2. ESTABLISH the first quarterly review of the Delegated Authority Register by the Audit Committee to be for the period from 01 July 2001 to 30 September 2001.

2. CONSIDER the parameters from the first quarterly review to include:-

2.1.2 Issuance of Notices for Water Containment, Thoroughfare, unsightly Land, Erosion and Dangerous Trees

2.1.5 Withholding, selling and/or Disposing of goods

2.1.9 Awarding of Tenders

2.1.10 Waiving/Granting Concessions to Fee’s and charges (delegation not extended to waiving of fees and charges).

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY &

BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY”

Subsequent to the above, amendments to the Delegated Authority Register were made by Council as follows:

1. Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25 September 2001: Resolution Number: CE04-09/01: Employees to disclose interest in Delegated Planning Functions and General Delegations under the Local Government (Miscellaneous) Provisions) Act 1960.

“That Council BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:-

1. Delegate the authority to approve and refuse building plans and specifications under Section 374 (1b) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960 to the Co-ordinator of Building Services and the Senior Building Surveyor representing the position of Building Surveyor for the City of Wanneroo as defined under this Act.

2. AMEND the Delegation Register as adopted by Council on 14 August 2001 in relation to:-

2. Delegations from Council:-

2.2 City of Wanneroo District Town Planning Scheme No. 2

2.3 Town Planning and Development Act 1927

by adding the following clause:-

Disclosure of Interest

If an employee has been delegated a power or duty relating to a matter and the employee has an interest in the matter, the employee must not exercise the power or discharge the duty an:-

(a) in the case of the CEO, must disclose to the Mayor the nature of the interest as soon as practicable after becoming aware that he or she has the interest in the matter; and

(b) in the case of any other employee, must disclose to the CEO the nature of the interest as soon as practicable after becoming aware that he or she has the interest in the matter.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY &

BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY”

2. Ordinary Council Meeting held on 02 July 2002: Resolution Number: CD05-07/02:

“DELEGATE TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the authority to waive fees and charges and approve donations in accordance with the provisions of Council’s Donations, Sponsorship, and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.?

3. Ordinary Council Meeting held on 13 August 2002: Resolution Number: CD00-07/02:

“2. AMENDS by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Delegation 2.1.17 Appointment of Authorised persons to perform Functions in Local Government Law Enforcement by deleting the following limitations:-

“That in the event of an objection being received from a decision of an authorised person to not withdraw a delegation, the objection is to be dealt with by Council”

Detail

The Local Government Act 1995 requires that Chief Executive Officer review all delegations made to him from Council.

The Chief Executive Officer has conducted a thorough review of the Delegation Register and is seeking Council’s approval to vary several delegations, which are summarised below:

1. Tenders

Council is requested to review the limit of authority to the Chief Executive to accept tenders from the current level of $50,000 to the following new limits:

Vehicles/Plant

Unlimited, subject to purchase being as scheduled (type/ standard) and within budget.

All other tenders

$100,000.

2. Extension of Contracts

Council is requested to consider a new instrument of delegation to the Chief Executive Officer granting the Chief Executive Officer the power to approve the extensions of contracts subject to:

· The tender specifying the provision of the option term

· The contract providing for the extension

· The extension being on the same terms and conditions as detailed in the option term of the existing contract.

3. Approval of Sub-divisions

4. Use of the City of Wanneroo Common Seal

Council is requested to consider a new instrument of delegation to the Chief Executive Officer authorising the Chief Executive Officer to execute documents, which are not required to be executed under common seal subject to the limitations contained within the delegation as detailed unde the heading “Signatories for Contract Execution” of the register.

Consultation

The revised Delegation Register has been forwarded to all Directors and relevant Managers for comment and review prior to presentation to Council.

Comment

The revised Delegation Register differs from the previous Register adopted by Council in the following ways:

1. The register now mainly relates to Delegations from Council to the Chief Executive Officer. The previous register also made reference to Authorisations from Council. Whilst Authorisations were included in the original register for the purpose of information, it would appear that it has also provided for some confusion in its interpretation and as a result has been removed from the revised Delegated Authority Register.

2. The Chief Executive Officer is proposing in the revised register to, were ever possible only further delegate his powers from Council to either Directors or Managers.

3. Several instruments of delegations contained in the original delegation register have been further broken down into a series of delegations in the proposed register to assist both the Elected Members, Officers and the community understand the steps involved in the decision making process.

4. Whilst the Register predominantly focuses on the delegation of powers to the Chief Executive Officer, several pieces of legislation outside of the Local Government Act 1995 requires Council to delegate directly to other positions within Council. These delegations are contained within the register under the heading “Other Acts”.

Subject to adoption of the revised register by Council, the electronic based register will be amended and Elected Members will then be able to continually review the exercising of delegated powers by the Chief Executive Officer on-line through the computers in the Red Gum Room.

Statutory Compliance

The Local Government Act 1995 allows Council to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the majority of its powers as detailed below:

“5.42 (1) A local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or the discharge of any of its duties under this Act other than those referred to in section 5.43.

* Absolute Majority required.”

Section 5.43 states :

“5.43 A Local Government cannot delegate to a CEO any of the following powers or duties –

(a) any power or duty that requires a decision of an absolute majority or a 75% majority of the local government;

(b) accepting a tender which exceeds an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;

(c ) appointing an auditor

(d) acquiring or disposing of property valued at an amount exceeding an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;

(e) any of the local government’s powers under section 5.98, 5.99 or 5.100;

(f) borrowing money on behalf of the local government

(g) hearing or determining an objection of a kind referred to in section 9.5;

(h) any power or duty that required the approval of the Minister or the Governor; or

(i) such other powers or duties as may be prescribed.”

Section 5.44 states:-

“5.44. (1) A CEO may delegate to any employee of the local government the exercise of any any of the CEO’s powers or the discharge of any of the CEO’s duties under this Act other than this power of delegation.

(2) A delegation under this section is to be in writing and may be general or as otherwise provided in the instrument of delegation.

(3) This section extends to a power or duty the exercise or discharge of which has been delegated by a local government to the CEO under section 5.42, but in the case of such a power or duty —

(a) the CEO’s power under this section to delegate the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty; and

(b) the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty by the CEO’s delegate, are subject to any conditions imposed by the local government on its delegation to the CEO.

(4) Subsection (3)(b) does not limit the CEO’s power to impose conditions or further conditions on a delegation under this section.

(5) In subsections (3) and (4) —

“conditions” includes qualifications, limitations or exceptions.”

Section 5.46 (2) states:-

“At least once every financial year, delegations made under this Division are to be reviewed by the delegator.”

Strategic Implications

One of the strategies contained in the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan relates to reviewing and developing policies covering governance and management of our City. A further strategy within the strategic plan is in the establishment of an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.

The review and adoption of the Delegated Authority Register is both an important governance procedure but is also important in providing the community with a process that will be followed when Council delegates certain aspects of the decision making process aware from the Council meeting environment to the Chief Executive Officer.

Policy Implications

The Delegated Authority Register does relate closely to Council’s Policy Manual in that an instrument of delegation in the register references any Council Policy that provides for a decision to be made by the Chief Executive Officer.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. CONSIDER the review conducted by the Chief Executive Officer on the Delegated Authority Register; and

2. ADOPT as amended by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the City of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register as detailed below:

Item 4 To be tabled at the briefing

Item 5 Public Question Time

Item 6 Date of Next Meeting

The next Ordinary Councillors Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday, 27 August 2002, to be held at the Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.Closure

Item 1 Attendance

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item 3 Reports

1. Close of Advertising: Amendment No. 9 To City Of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2

2. Adoption Of Amendment No 8 To District Planning Scheme No. 2: Pt Lot 962 Anchorage Drive, Mindarie

3. Adoption of Estimated Cell Costs for East Wanneroo Cell 4 (Hocking - Pearsall).

4. Adoption of Amendment to East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (Madeley and Darch): Pt Lot 2 Wanneroo Road, Madeley

5. Lot 506 Old Yanchep Road, Carabooda - Proposed Rural Subdivision

6. Proposed Rural Subdivision - Lot 11 Safari Place and Lot 24 Emerald Drive, Carabooda

7. Request for Consent to Submit a Subdivision Application: Lot 3 Gibbs Road, Nowergup

8. Development Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For July 2002

9. Subdivision Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For The Month Of July 2002

10. Closure Of Thoroughfares To Vehicles: Evandale Road -Redcliffe Avenue, Marangaroo And Goldsworthy Entrance, Alexander Heights

11. Extension Of Contract No W00146 - The Provision Of Green Waste Shredding Services At Motivation Drive, Wangara

12. Extension Of Contract No’s W00129, W00130 And W00131

13. Tender Number 02240 – The Construction Of A Timber Stairway For Beach Access At Sceptre Court, Two Rocks

14. WALGA Initiative - Road Deterioration Modelling Study - Report Update

15. Perth Biodiversity Project - "Bushlinks" Project - Budget Variation

16. Extension Of Contract Number 01228 - Supply And Delivery Of Personal Computers

17. Warrant Of Payments - For The Period To 31 July 2002

18. Community Care Deed of Agreement

19. Request For Budget Allocation - Youth Challenge Camp

20. Request For Budget Variation - Merriwa Financial Counselling Service

21. Broadview Park Toilet Building

22. Waiver Of Entry Fees For Entry To The Gloucester Lodge Museum On Sunday October 6 2002

23. Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee

24. Submission on the Review of The Dog Act 1976 Issues Paper

25. Lease Of A Photocopier - Strategic & Executive Services

26. Annual Review - City Of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register

Item 4 To be tabled at the briefing

27. Adoption of Lot 12 Jindalee Local Structure Plan – Close of advertising

28. Fabcom Cell Composting Project

29. Extension of Contract Pipes

30. Draft Weed Management Policy

31. John Moloney Clubroom - Lease Agreement Working Group

Item 5 Public Question Time

Item 6 Date of Next Meeting