ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
7.00pm, 05 November, 2002
Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
Members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting.
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and statement time:
· Questions should only relate to the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or employees.
· Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
· The second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
Deputations
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.15pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Executive Services on 9405 5097.
· A time period of 15 minutes is set aside for each deputation.
· Deputations shall not exceed five (5) persons in number and only three (3) of those persons shall be at liberty to address the Council and to respond to questions the Mayor and Councillors may have.
Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries on this agenda, please contact Executive Services on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for tape recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Meetings.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, of electors and of the Audit Committee shall be recorded, by the City, on sound recording equipment except, in the case of meetings of the Council or the Audit Committee, where the Council or the Committee, as the case may be, closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding sub clause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council or of the Audit Committee which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council or the Audit Committee, as the case requires, resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recorded Tapes
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of the taped proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer.
(5) Elected Members may listen to a recording of the Council proceedings upon request, free of charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer.
(6) Costs of providing taped proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the tape plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recordings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s schedule of fees and charges each year.
Retention of Tapes
(7) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the Library Board of Western Australia Act (1951-83), General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records. The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(8) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors and the Audit Committee meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 05 November, 2002 commencing at 7.00pm.
C JOHNSON
Chief Executive Officer
31 October 2002
CONTENTS
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-10/02 Minutes Of Ordinary Council Meeting Held On 15 October 2002
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
PT02-09/02 Drainage Sump Maintenance, Tapping Way, Quinns Rocks
PT03-09/02 Public Open Space, Belgrade Park Estate, Wanneroo
PT01--10/02 Proposed Installation of a Concrete Bus Shelter
PT02-10/02 Bush Wildlife Corridor - Butler, Jindalee and Alkimos
PD01-11/02 Adoption of the Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan
PD02-11/02 Review of the Title and Terms of Reference of The Conservation Advisory Committee
PD03-11/02 East Wanneroo Rural Land Use and Water Management Review
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
PD07-11/02 Adoption of Amendment to the Mindarie Keys Harbourside Village Agreed Structure Plan
PD08-11/02 Request for Consent to Apply for Subdivision: Lot 9 (30) Ashby Street, Wanneroo
LR01-11/02 Consideration of the close of advertising - amendment no. 9 to district planning scheme no. 2 (Late report - TO BE TABLED) 112
PD09-11/02 Proposed Tourist Facility - Part Lot 3 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo
PD10-11/02 Unauthorised Retaining Walls - Lot 562 (9) Compass Circle, Yanchep
PD11-11/02 Subdivision Applications Dealt With Under Delegated Authority During September 2002
PD12-11/02 Development Applications Determined by Delegated Authority for September 2002
TS06-11/02 Parking Prohibitions - Amos Road and Joel Way, Wanneroo
TS07-11/02 Old Yanchep Road - Pinjar Road, Pinjar - Speed Zone Review
TS08-11/02 Parking Prohibitions - Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
TS09-11/02 Parking Prohibitions - Addington Way, Marangaroo
TS10-11/02 Petition - Public Open Space, Belgrade Park Estate, Wanneroo
TS11-11/02 Sale of Aluminium Can Baler
TS12-11/02 Bus Shelter Grant Scheme
TS13-11/02 Budget Variation - Tennis Court Resurfacing Projects at Montrose and Hudson Parks
TS14-11/02 Streetside Advertising - Proposed Settlement
TS15-11/02 Petition PT02-09/02 - Tapping Way Quinns Rocks
CS01-11/02 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 30 September 2002
CS02-11/02 Financial Report for the Month Ended 31 August 2002
CS03-11/02 Marangaroo Family Centre - Playground Area
CD01-11/02 Disability Services Plan Review
CD02-11/02 Appointment to the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group
CD03-11/02 John Moloney Community Facility - Lease Agreement Working Group
CD04-11/02 Introduction of a New Charge for the Old Civic Centre
CD05-11/02 Application to Keep More Than Two Dogs - 124 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo
CD06-11/02 Addition to Municipal Heritage Inventory
CD07-11/02 Introduction of a New Charge for Library Services
CD09-11/02 Requests for Donations and the Waiver of Fees and Charges - October 2002
CD11-11/02 Revision of Internet Links Policy
CD12-11/02 Non-Recurrent Funding Received by Community Development Directorate in 2001/2002
CE02-11/02 Strategic Plan: Quarterly Performance Report - September Quarter 2002
CE03-11/02 Adoption of Community Consultation and Engagement Policy
CE04-11/02 Approval of Council Meeting Dates for 2003
CE05-11/02 Delegation of Authority to Mayor and Chief Executive Officer
CE06-11/02 Christmas Close Down of the Administration Building and Libraries
CE07-11/02 Appointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer
MN01-11/02 Cr M Grierson - Format of Rate Notices for 2003/2004
MN02-11/02 Cr J Hughes - Closure of Public Accessway - Connell Way Through Ferrara Reserve
CR01-11/02 Investigation by Chief Executive Officer into the Safer Citizens Program
AGENDA
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 15 October 2002 be confirmed.
Cr Goodenough presented a petition signed by 22 residents in the vicinity of Tapping Way, Quinns Rocks, calling upon Council to look at some maintenance issues with the drainage sump.
ACTION
A reported is being presented to Council in the current agenda papers at Item TS15-11/02.
Cr Monks presented a petition signed by 154 residents in relation to the development of Public Open Space Stage Two at Belgrade Park Estate, Wanneroo.
ACTION
A reported is being presented to Council in the current agenda papers at Item TS10-11/02.
Cr Steffens presented a petition signed by 14 residents stating that they did not approve of the proposal for a concrete bus shelter adjacent to the intersection of Garrigan Place and Renshaw Boulevard, Clarkson and also that the present position of the bus stop was in a dangerous location.
ACTION
A report will be presented to Council at its meeting of 26 November 2002.
Cr Steffens presented a petition signed by 3477 residents requesting that the City of Wanneroo demands that Land Developers in Butler, Jindalee and Alkimos incorporate bush wildlife corridors between the coastal reserve and Neerabup National Park in future urban designs.
ACTION
This matter will be considered in conjunction with a report to Council on Butler Jindalee district structure plan. The report will be presented to either the 26 November or 17 December meeting.
Cr Treby to declare an impartiality interest in Item CS03-11/02 on page 265 due to being a committee member of the Marangaroo Family Centre.
Cr Stewart to declare an impartiality interest in Item CD08-11/02 on page 296 due to being President of the Wanneroo Cricket Association and receiving honorarium which West Coast Cricket Club as a recipient of the monies from the Council is a member of the Wanneroo Cricket Association.
Cr Monks to declare an impartiality interest in Item TS06-11/02 on page 182 due to being Deputy Chairperson of Elderbloom and the nursing home in Amos Road forms part of Elderbloom Community Care Centres.
File Ref: PR12/0002V01
File Name: AAAdooft.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider adopting the Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan.
Background
Gnangara Lake Reserve (GLR) has been suffering from a loss of environmental and social value for a considerable period of time, owing to several factors including:
· Uncontrolled off-road vehicle access;
· Weed invasion;
· Phytophthora dieback;
· Fire management problems;
· Inappropriate facilities;
· Poor and undefined access;
· Water quality;
· Bushland fragmentation and inappropriate tracks; and
· Fragmentation of ownership and management responsibilities.
In recognition of these issues, Council, at its meeting of 6 February, 2001(Item W20-02/01) resolved to approve the preparation of a brief for the appointment of a consultant to prepare a new Management Plan for the Gnangara Lake Reserve.
ATA Environmental were subsequently appointed to undertake the study and the resultant draft Management Plan was presented to Council for its consideration at its meeting of 21st May 2002 (Item PD12-05/02). At this meeting Council resolved to adopt the management strategies outlined in the draft Management Plan for the purposes of advertising and review the implementation schedule of the plan.
Detail
The various land parcels comprising GLR are vested with the City of Wanneroo, Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) and Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI). A plan outlining the areas vested or owned by each agency is shown on Attachment 1. This fragmentation of ownership and therefore management responsibility means that the site has not previously been considered in a holistic manner.
The existing management plan dates back to 1990 and is considered to be significantly outdated owing to improvements in environmental awareness, knowledge, policy, legislation etc. The plan also only considers land vested within the City.
To ensure the best possible outcome the brief for quotes was prepared in consultation with CALM and DPI. Both agencies expressed support for the preparation of the Management Plan, with CALM contributing to the process by engaging a consultant to map the extent of Phytophthora dieback in the reserve. Representatives from both agencies have also been involved in the preparation process with their comments requested at several stages.
The draft Management Plan seeks to improve the environmental and social qualities of the Gnangara Lake area by considering the bushland and wetland as a single portion of land. It is intended to review the Management Plan within 5 years to keep it current. The recommendations of the Management Plan are grouped under the following headings;
· Principal management directions;
· Conservation;
· Recreation;
· Leases and commercial operations;
· Community relations;
· Research and monitoring; and
· Implementation.
The draft list of strategies under each of these headings, as adopted by Council in May 2002 for the purposes of advertising is set out in Attachment 2. Each recommendation has been allocated a timeframe for the implementation and a responsible agency to ensure that it is carried out. The primary focus of the Management Plan has been to control off-road vehicle access, enable pedestrian access, improve facilities including carparking, prevent further bushland degradation and enable rehabilitation. The Plan proposes that the reserve be divided into 3 zones each with a different management focus. The zones are:
· Conservation and Protection Zone;
· Recreation Zone; and
· Rehabilitation Demonstration Zone.
The plan indicating these zones and other recommendations is set out in Attachment 3. The extent of each zone is based upon the quality of the vegetation and the existing land uses. The Conservation and Protection Zone comprises most of the site, with the Rehabilitation Demonstration Zone occupying land that was formerly used as a quarry. The proposed Recreation Zone refers to the existing semi-developed areas. The Management Plan recommends that conservation should be established as the principal management direction of the reserve, with any other uses to be compatible with this.
A copy of the draft Management Plan has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Consultation
A workshop was held with the City’s Conservation Advisory Committee and other community members early in the preparation process of the Management Plan. The comments raised were used to assist in the preparation of the plan.
The draft Management Plan was advertised for public comment for a period of 6 weeks in accordance with Council’s resolution, with the following advertising strategies being used:
· An advertisement being placed in the Wanneroo Times Community Newspaper on two separate occasions;
· Two onsite advertising signs placed at strategic locations on Gnangara Road and Sydney Road adjacent to the reserve;
· Copies of the draft Management Plan being placed in all City libraries, in the City Administration Centre and on the City website for public viewing;
· Letters to nearby residents; and
· The preparation of a media release and subsequent article published in the Wanneroo Times.
A total of nine submissions were received, all commenting on various aspects of the draft Management Plan.
Comment
A summary of the issues raised by the submissions together with an Administration response on each comment is included as Attachment 4. Several changes to the draft Management Plan are recommended in response to both the submissions and a detailed review of the document by Administration. The substantive recommended changes to the management strategies are outlined below, with the full list of changes to the overall document (including the explanatory section and the management strategies shown in Attachment 5. As the changes will be undertaken by the consultant, the draft Management Plan document has not been updated until Council has endorsed the changes.
The substantive recommended changes to the management strategies are as follows:
STRATEGY |
RECOMMENDED CHANGE |
P4 |
This strategy recommends amending the reservations and vesting of the land within the reserve to ensure that that the entire area is reserved as a Conservation and Recreation “A” Class reserve as part of a broader regional park, with CALM as the managing agency.
CALM has suggested that the recommendation should be modified to “Seek to amend the reservation and vested purpose…” given the high level government approval that this will require.
The draft management plan also had this management strategy listed as a medium to long term strategy, which would see implementation occurring within a 2-10 year timeframe. Given the regional significance of the reserve, the fact that the existing fragmentation of ownership has contributed to some of the existing problems at the reserve and given the limited capacity of the City to contribute toward funding and expertise, it is considered that the rating of this management strategy should be changed to a high priority. This would see this strategy being implemented within a 2 year period.
|
P6
|
This strategy relates to interim management arrangements and should be deleted as it is essentially a repeat of Strategy P5.
|
C3 |
This strategy relates to progressively rehabilitating disturbed areas and should be changed from a high rating to a medium to low rating (2-10 years) given financial resources required to achieve this and higher capital priorities, such as fencing. The strategy should also include reference to using local natives where practical.
|
C6 |
This strategy recommends following suitable hygiene practices during implementation of works and should be amended to make reference to following suitable Phytophthora dieback hygiene practices to improve clarity.
|
C7 |
This strategy recommends considering the use of phosphorus acid or phosphite to control dieback spread. The strategy should be deleted given CALM’s advice that this method of control is unwarranted given the widespread nature of the infestation and the costs involved.
|
C9 |
This strategy recommends the use of baiting to control feral animals. Given CALM’s advice that it does not use baiting in urban areas given the associated risks, the strategy should be modified to consider developing measures to reduce the impact of feral animals on native fauna.
|
C11 |
This strategy relates to installing and maintaining firebreaks and should be deleted as it is a component of strategy C12 which requires the development and implementation of a Fire Management and Response Plan.
|
R5 |
This strategy seeks to prohibit wildflower harvesting and off road vehicle training. CALM has advised that it manages wildflower picking and this is permitted within the state forest portion of the reserve. The strategy should be amended to recognise this.
|
The City acknowledges that the reserve contains four identified sites of Aboriginal Heritage, with the reserve also being subject to a Native Title claim. Consultation with relevant groups and individuals will be necessary before the physical implementation of some infrastructure works (fencing, pathways etc) can commence. The Management Plan does recommend (Management Strategy C14) that consultation for such purposes should be an integral part of the implementation process.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Management Plan is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan and its goal of Environmental Sustainability. Objective 1.1.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Strategic Plan is to develop management plans and strategies for the protection and conservation of important environmental assets.
Policy Implications
The preparation of this Management Plan is consistent with the City’s Policy on Environmental Sustainability which has the following objectives:
“To:
· Protect and enhance the natural and human environment for the benefit of present and future generations;
· Minimise, as far as practicable, any adverse environmental impacts associated with its activities; and
· Take advantage of environmentally beneficial opportunities.”
Financial Implications
The Management Plan has financial implications for all 3 landholders – the City of Wanneroo, CALM and DPI, with each landholder initially being responsible for its own portion of land, until the reserve purpose and vestings are amended (high priority rating). The Plan makes recommendations for works in several areas that will ultimately cost a considerable amount. Cost estimates have been provided and these are shown on Attachment 6.
The cost estimates are for the total land area and have not been broken down into areas that are under the responsibility of the 3 landholders. The plan does note that any rehabilitation undertaken will need to be a long term proposition, owing to the high cost involved and identifies 3 sites as priorities, with most of the area being on land managed by the DPI or CALM. The adoption of a Management Plan will assist the City in obtaining funds from other sources to assist with the proposed works schedule.
Council has $100,000 allocated in the current financial year budget for fencing and $64,000 for implementation of associated works for this reserve.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the comments and responses made on the submissions received during the advertising period for the Draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan as detailed in Attachment 4 to this report.
2. ENDORSES the proposed modifications to the draft Gnangara Lake Reserve Management Plan as detailed in Attachment 5 to this report and ADOPTS the Management Plan so modified.
3. RECOMMENDS that the Department of Conservation and Land Management and Department for Planning and Infrastructure also adopt the Management Plan (as modified).
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
|
10. SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
All of the management strategies included in this Management Plan are listed in Table 7. Each of the management strategies has been assigned a rating for implementation that identifies those strategies that should be focussed on initially and those that can be implemented at a later time.
The rating system applicable as part of this Management Plan is as follows:
· High [H] primary importance, implement immediately (within 2 years)
· Medium [M] secondary importance, implement within 2 –5 years
· Low [L] longer term consideration, implement within 5-10 years
The agency that should have primary responsibility for implementing or overseeing implementation of the management strategy is nominated in Table 7. In several instances all of the landowners or vesting authorities of land within GLR are considered responsible for implementation of the strategies, while for others the primary role for implementation is assigned to a single agency.
The nominated responsible agency may change subject to the negotiations and outcome of strategies to establish a Regional Park (P4) and establishment of the coordinating group (P5) and interim formal management arrangements (P6).
TABLE 7
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Management Strategy |
Rating |
Responsible Agency |
|
PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS |
|||
P1 |
Establish conservation as the primary goal of GLR and allow and promote managed recreation, educational and research activities consistent with the conservation objectives. |
H |
ALL |
P2 |
Adopt the management principles for GLR outlined in this Management Plan. |
H |
ALL |
P3 |
Implement management of GLR according to the zones and their acceptable uses and facilities identified in this Management Plan. |
H |
ALL |
P4 |
Amend the vesting purpose and create reserves as necessary to ensure the entire GLR is managed as a Conservation and Recreation “A” Class reserve as part of a broader Regional Park with CALM as the managing authority. |
M-L |
ALL |
P5 |
Establish a coordinating group to oversee implementation of this Management Plan. |
H |
ALL |
P6 |
Establish interim formal management arrangements to coordinate management between the vested agencies and landowners until a Regional Park is formed. |
H |
ALL |
P7 |
Ensure adequate liaison with relevant agencies to promote integrated management of GLR with adjoining areas such as Gnangara Park and any future Regional Park incorporating nearby wetlands. |
M |
ALL |
CONSERVATION |
|||
C1 |
Investigate the causes of acidification within the lake and develop a remediation program. |
M-L |
CoW |
C2 |
Regularly review results of water level, water quality and biological monitoring within the lake, and identify significant changes or issues and implement strategies as necessary. |
H |
CoW |
C3 |
Progressively rehabilitate disturbed and degraded areas initially focussing efforts in areas that have greatest potential to impact on better quality vegetation areas. |
H-M |
ALL |
C4 |
Implement a weed control program that prioritises control of weeds based on invasiveness, distribution and impacts, focuses on areas adjacent to those that are largely weed free, and is integrated with rehabilitation works. |
H |
ALL |
C5 |
Ensure recreation areas are appropriately designed to minimise potential for grass and other species to invade bushland areas. |
H |
CoW |
C6 |
Follow suitable hygiene practices during implementation of works. |
H |
ALL |
C7 |
Consider strategic phosphorus acid or phosphite application to control spread into currently uninfested areas. |
M-L |
ALL |
C8 |
Use species that are resistant to dieback to revegetate areas that have been mapped as infested or uninterpretable. |
H |
ALL |
C9 |
Consider implementing a baiting program for feral animals in association with feral animal control methods that may be implemented within adjoining pine plantations. |
M-L |
ALL |
C10 |
Consider imposing controls on domestic cats within surrounding development areas. |
M-L |
CoW |
C11 |
Install and maintain firebreaks as outlined in this Management Plan. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
C12 |
Develop and implement a Fire Management and Response Plan for GLR. |
H |
ALL |
C13 |
Remove all waste such as car bodies, sheet metal and household refuse from GLR on a continuous basis. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
C14 |
Ensure the implementation of management measures is in accordance with the requirements of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. |
H |
ALL |
C15 |
Incorporate information on the cultural values into interpretative material and facilities where feasible. |
M |
ALL |
C16 |
Liaise with Aboriginal groups to discuss proposed works and determine possible involvement in the management of GLR. |
H |
ALL |
C17 |
Protect important viewscapes from nominated recreational areas. |
H |
CoW |
RECREATION |
|||
R1 |
Develop recreational areas with appropriate facilities within the areas of GLR nominated as suitable for recreational use in accordance with this Management Plan. |
H |
CoW |
R2 |
Remove existing facilities on the south-east of the lake and develop new facilities including toilets, picnic areas, parkland, play equipment and car parking. |
H |
CoW |
R3 |
Consider development of a Rehabilitation Demonstration area within the disused quarry near Gnangara Road to include recreational opportunities associated with environmental education as part of the rehabilitation strategy. |
M |
ALL |
R4 |
Install fencing or bollards around recreation nodes and GLR perimeter to limit off road vehicle access. |
H |
CoW |
R5 |
Prohibit access for activities such as wildflower harvesting and off-road vehicle training. |
H-M |
CALM |
R6 |
Install dual use paths and walk trails around the periphery of the wetland and within the bushland areas. |
H-M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R7 |
Ensure access for fire fighting and maintenance vehicles. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R8 |
Permit dogs within Recreation Zones only on a leash. |
H |
CoW |
R9 |
Install bridle trails adjacent to the dual use path around the lake and along firebreaks in the northern section of GLR. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R10 |
Annually review the impacts of horse riding and dog exercise activities as part of routine monitoring. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R11 |
Rationalise tracks by closing and rehabilitating tracks with no identified use. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R12 |
Erect signage at strategic locations that informs visitors of access and facilities, and provides interpretive material about the values of GLR and possible impacts of inappropriate use of the area. |
H-M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
R13 |
Promote visitor safety through educative material and signage. |
H-M |
ALL |
LEASES & COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS |
|||
L1 |
Mining and quarrying activities within GLR should not be permitted. |
H |
ALL |
L2 |
Any permitted commercial activities are to be consistent with or complementary to the conservation objectives |
H |
ALL |
COMMUNITY RELATIONS |
|||
CR1 |
Investigate the potential use of the existing house within GLR for interpretive and educative purposes and/or as a base for community groups assisting within environmental management in the area. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
CR2 |
Signage, leaflets, articles and interpretive walk trails should be used to encourage greater appreciation of the values of GLR and its management. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
CR3 |
Support and encourage involvement of the community and community based organizations in seed collection, tree planting, weed removal and monitoring by informing the community of planned activities and canvassing support. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
CR4 |
Develop programs in association with local schools for involvement with activities such as seed collecting, planting and monitoring, and for visits to GLR to increase awareness and appreciation of the area. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
CR5 |
Seek the input of local residents as part of the process of implementation and review of this Management Plan. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
CR6 |
Use signage or organised events to identify community groups, schools, and other parties that are involved in or sponsor activities associated with management of GLR. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
RESEARCH & MONITORING |
|||
RM1 |
Promote research activities within GLR particularly to investigate water quality issues within Gnangara Lake through liaison with relevant agencies and educational institutions. |
M |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
RM2 |
Support the continuation of current monitoring programs undertaken by the WRC. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
RM3 |
Routinely monitor changes in bushland condition and weed distribution, fire events, visitor usage and impacts of activities. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
IMPLEMENTATION |
|||
I1 |
Develop a detailed 5 year program for the implementation of the measures outlined in this Management Plan. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
I2 |
Liaise with the various responsible agencies or owners of land in GLR to ensure a coordinated management approach for implementation, funding and staffing is developed. |
H |
ALL |
I3 |
Coordinate activities of community groups and volunteers within GLR. |
H-M |
CoW |
I4 |
Review management strategies and implementation progress on an annual basis in conjunction with preparation of a detailed works program. The review should identify what has been achieved and consider the implications of any new information. |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
I5 |
Revise the plan within 5 years from the date the final plan is produced |
H |
CoW with CALM & DPI |
Note: CoW: City of Wanneroo
CALM: Department of Conservation & Land Management
DPI: Department of Planning & Infrastructure
ALL: CoW, CALM, DPI
WRC: Water & Rivers Commission
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
DRAFT GNANGARA LAKE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
SCHEDULE OF SUBMISSIONS FOLLOWING ADVERTISING
(Closed 16thJuly 2002)
Table 1
Sub No. |
Name of Submittor |
Submission Details |
Council Comment and Response |
1 |
Water Corporation |
1) Water Corporation is not responsible for drainage and it is suggested that the Water and Rivers Commission (WRC) are contacted to ensure correct drainage techniques are used. The site is within a proclaimed Underground Water Pollution Control Area (UWPCA) for drinking water supply. Advice on this can be obtained from the WRC.
2) Both the existing and future Water Corporation Bore Fields are to the south of the area in the draft Management Plan, although a well head protection zone falls within a portion of the reserve.
3) Text on P. 11 should refer to the Water Corporation and not Water Authority.
|
1) The City acknowledges the roles of the Water Corporation and Water and Rivers Commission in the provision of drinking water, and that the site is within a proclaimed UWPCA. The advice of the WRC has been sought on the draft Management Plan (see submission 3). A map of the UWPCA boundaries will be included in the revised Management Plan.
2) The location of the well head is acknowledged and will be identified in the management plan along with implications relating to this.
3) The data referred to was collected and published by the then Water Authority prior to its split into the Water and Rivers Commission and Water Corporation.
|
2 |
Lake Gnangara Conservation and Community Group |
1) Cultural History (section 2.3.1) - During WWII an internment camp existed to the east of Gnangara Lake to hold specific nationalities.
2) Natural Environment Values (section 3.1) - Research into capping of mined areas with limestone should be considered to minimise oxidation of sediment. Review with research on Lake Jandabup
3) Integrated Management of Gnangara Lake Reserve and adjacent areas (section 3.5) - The need for integrated management of the entire site is supported, as is the inclusion of the site in a Regional Park or part of Gnangara Park.
4) Gnangara Lake levels (section 4.2) - Excavation of the lake would compound acidity problems and should not be considered
5). Gnangara Lake Levels (section 4.2) - Stormwater runoff should be managed to control nutrient and pollution issues.
6) Pets and introduced fauna (section 4.7) - dogs should be restricted from the lake margins due to the habitat and breeding requirements of avian fauna.
7) Pets and introduced fauna (section 4.7) - Previous incidents highlight the problems of integrating dog exercise areas and horses. Bridal trails should be restricted to the western and northern boundaries with links to Gnangara Park along the northern boundary. The Eastern boundary should be retained as conservation with no dog or horse access.
8) Fire (section 4.8) - Fuel load estimates should be calculated using correct methods and consider ecological requirements. Planned burning should not be considered as a suitable method for fuel load reduction. Records should be retained detailing fuel load calculations/fuel load reduction methods and any fire events. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority of WA recently expanded fire breaks during the Whiteman park fire event. More control required to prevent ad hoc reactions.
9) Midge and mosquito control (section 4.9) - Suitable fringing vegetation should be retained and/or established to provide a buffer between the lake and nearby residents to curb midge movement. This should also include the western edge earmarked for recreation.
10) Ecological restoration and rehabilitation (section 4.10 and 5.4) - control of access of vehicles should be considered a priority to minimise disturbance. Motorcycles are a major problem and access control methods should be designed to restrict their entry.
11) Ecological restoration and rehabilitation (section 4.10) - Local natives only should be used in rehabilitation.
12) Recreation sites and facilities (section 5.3) - The current toilet block should be removed because of anti social behaviour and perhaps locked during the week.
13) Vehicle access (section 5.4) - Agree that only limited parking should be permitted on the western boundary and that the vegetation buffer should be maintained.
14) Vehicle access (section 5.4) - Motorcycles and off-road vehicles are still a problem in the pine plantation and therefore fencing is necessary on the eastern boundary to control access.
15) Pedestrian and disabled access (section 5.4) - paths should be of suitable condition to allow wheelchair access. |
1) A discussion with the person making the submission revealed that the exact location of this is unknown. If the data can be located and verified it may be possible to include it on information displays at the site during the implementation phase of the Management Plan.
2) The Management Plan recommends that investigation into methods to improve water quality should be considered. Such investigations may be a collaborative effort between the responsible agencies. Any decisions on research to betaken would utilise information currently collected by the responsible agencies.
3) Acknowledged
4) This section of the Plan refers to methods that may be used to increase the water depth. The Management Plan also acknowledges that excavation is not considered to be appropriate owing to the alteration it will cause to the wetland.
5) Gnangara Lake does not have any direct inflow of stormwater into the wetland, unlike other wetlands in Wanneroo. However, new construction work in the area should be based on Water Sensitive Urban Design Principles.
6) The report acknowledges that dog exercising is likely to conflict with conservation objectives and recommends that dogs are restricted to the 2 existing recreational areas with dogs to be kept on a leash at all times. The action is covered by recommendation R8. 7) The Management Plan has attempted to reconcile existing uses of the area with conservation values to try and improve the social and environmental value of the site. This includes providing bridle trail areas. It is acknowledged in the plan that this may need to be revised in the future depending upon any potential issues which may arise. Recommendation R10 recommends that annual reviews of horse riding and dog exercise in the site take place. Should these reviews highlight any problems then modifications may be necessary.
8) Preparation of the Management Plan involved extensive consultation with the City’s Fire Management Officer to ensure its acceptability. This needs to have consideration of the urban housing values aswell as the conservation values of the site. Recommendations C4, C11 and C12 deal with fire management issues. This includes weed control (owing to their flammability), the use of firebreaks and developing and implementing a Fire Management and Response Plan.
9) The City is not presently aware of any midge or mosquito problems arising from Gnangara Lake. It is acknowledged, however, that the WRC recommends buffers of up to 1000 for nuisance insects and that several dwellings are likely to be in this area. Increasing the density of vegetation is acknowledged as a strategy to control the movement of midge and mosquitos.
11) This is the intent of the Management Plan, however, it is acknowledged that it has not been explicitly stated. Recommendation C5 will be modified to include reference to local natives.
12) Removal of the toilet block is planned in the current financial year.
13) Acknowledged
14) The eastern boundary of Gnangara Lake Reserve is part of State Forest 65 under the management of CALM. Implementation of the recommendations of the management plan for this portion of the site will require the co-operation of CALM.
15) The design of the Dual Use Paths has not yet been established. Design for disabled access will be considered at that point.
|
3 |
Water and Rivers Commission |
1) Generally the management plan is considered to be good, with the proposed strategies able to address most issues. However, it must be noted that without timely action the site will further degrade with its conservation status at risk. Therefore it is recommended that timeframes are added for each strategy listed in Table 7 with annual progress reporting.
2) Section 1.4 mentions the Gnangara Mound Crown Land Environmental Protection Policy (EPP) and minimum water levels that have been set for the lake. The Management Plan correctly notes that the EPP’s minimum level of 41.3m AHD was based on environmental conditions set on the then Water Authority for abstraction of groundwater for public and private use. However, the conditions have been reviewed since then with a revised level of 42m AHD set in 1996. The Gnangara Mound Crown Lands EPP has not been updated to reflect this more recent work. The conditions are again under formal review under Section 46 of the Environmental Protection Act and may lead to a change in levels being recommended again. The Section. 46 Review will take the management plan into consideration.
3) Water availability and quality appear to be the main factors affecting the lake condition. Most of the acidification and high N levels appear to be linked to a lowering of the watertable and/or exposure of the pyritic soils owing to mining. The draft Management Plan highlights the effect of low water levels as potentially the major cause of acidification, but the possible effect that mining has had on disturbing the lake beds and exposing pyritic soils should also be mentioned. If disturbance of lake sediments is a contributing factor, strategies such as excavating the lake to create deeper areas would not be a sensible option to improve lake values.
4) Exposure of pyritic soils upon lowering of the watertable and subsequent oxidation will produce acid sulphate soils. The severity will be determined by the length of exposure. Acid conditions are likely to be aiding to the decomposition of organic matter, hence the concentration of N. Other potential sources of N should also be investigated such as septic waste from the toilet block, dumping of organic waste and groundwater pollutant plumes from nearby land uses. An investigation of groundwater nutrient plumes may help ascertain whether land uses are impacting on water quality. As the management plan mentions, research may help identify the causes of nutrient enrichment and acidification problems and recommend appropriate remediation options.
5) Section 4.2 mentions the possibility of artificial maintenance of Lake Gnangara. It should be mentioned in the management plan that this could only be considered a short term solution, and that as a very large volume of water would be required at great cost it is unlikely that this will be a feasible solution. Lakes Jandabup and Nowergup are artificially maintained as groundwater abstraction was affecting these wetlands, with potential for significant loss of value if levels were allowed to decline. Lake Gnangara has already been affected by water level declines and anthropogenic changes over the 20th Century and has low ecological value in comparison to other wetlands. The cost of maintenance would outweigh the possible benefits.
6) Section 4.2 mentions lobbying Water Corp and WRC to reduce groundwater abstraction around the lake to try and increase Lake levels. The Management Plan should note that licensed private abstraction is a significant source of groundwater abstraction and that private users would be affected by groundwater allocation reductions. The Section 46 Review of environmental conditions will include a review of sustainable groundwater yields with any changes likely to have implications for all users.
7) Table 2 presents some water quality data. The use of medians may provide a better representation of general conditions in the lake rather than presenting high and low extremes. Medians can then be compared to guidelines. The EPA 1993 Guidelines could be updated to the more recent ANZECC 2000 trigger levels.
8) The WRC has developed guidelines for recreational activities which are dependant on the priority zoning of the Underground Water Pollution Control Area (UWPCA). The site contains priority 1, 2 and 3 areas, so recreation activities should be compatible with these Priority classifications.
9) Section 10 - Some of the strategies are very broad and will require refinement, while others are specific and require a lead agency. However, no lead agency is identified on those strategies listed as “All” so further consideration of responsibility may be necessary to ensure that the strategy is implemented.
|
1) Section 10 of the Management Plan notes that the priority ranking system used is high, medium and low. The high priority actions are proposed to be investigated within 2 years, the medium items by 2 – 5 years, with the low priority items by 5 – 10 years. The draft Local Environmental Strategy recommends that an annual review be prepared outlining the City’s performance on implementing the proposed strategies.
2) Acknowledged – the Management Plan will be modified to reflect the advice given.
3) Mining for diatomaceous earth has been identified by previous studies for the WRC as a possible cause of the acidification of Gnangara Lake. The text will be modified to reflect the possibility that mining may have caused or contributed to the acidification of the wetland.
4) Any research undertaken should be complementary or additional to the current monitoring programmes of the WRC. The Management Plan highlights that research may identify methods to reverse the water quality decline, but does not suggest what direction should be taken. This may be better considered by the proposed Co-ordinating Committee that will be established to oversee the implementation of the Management Plan.
5) It is acknowledged that any programme of artificial maintenance could only be considered a temporary solution and would have significant costs. If such a programme was to be implemented then it should be to either preserve existing qualities or restore qualities that have been lost. The Management Plan notes that it is uncertain whether raising the water level will improve water quality and it does not make any recommendation to artificially maintain water levels.
6) The users of groundwater on the Gnangara Mound are private abstraction, public abstraction (Water Corporation), native vegetation and the pine plantation. Reduction in abstraction from any of these sources may lead to a rise in water levels (assuming average rainfall is constant). (See also Submission No. 6 – from CALM – Item 3). The text willbe modified slightly to reflect the issue raised.
7) The ANZECC 2000 water quality guidelines will be included in the revised Management Plan for easier comparative purposes.
8) The WRC were involved with the preparation of the Management Plan specifically because of the groundwater and wetland management issues. The intent of the Plan is to improve social and environmental qualities, therefore compliance with WRC guidelines will be essential. The text will be modified to include reference to the WRC guidelines, and include a map showing the location of the Priority Water Source Areas.
9) The Management Plan notes that all three landholders will be responsible for implementing some of the strategies of the Management Plan. Co-operation between the agencies will be necessary to ensure their effective implementation, and may be best achieved through the proposed co-ordinating committee that will be established to oversee the implementation of the Management Plan. The City may ensure that the strategies are considered by the Committee, however, implementation may be the responsibility of all landholders. |
4 |
Alice Stubber |
1) Gnangara Lake is a unique natural asset of the City and like all natural areas needs to be managed to ensure long term conservation. The support of the City for this is welcomed.
2) Management of the entire area by a single agency is important to ensure that the management plan is implemented, unlike the previous plan.
3) Restricting access of off-road vehicles is the main priority. This should include a fence along the eastern boundary. It has been shown elsewhere that natural rehabilitation occurs quickly once the disturbance is removed.
4) Rehabilitation of the quarry site (once vehicle access has been denied) may be a low priority given the high cost of the work.
5) It appears that the City is responsible for a lot of infrastructure costs (eg installing fences). Assistance from the State and Federal Government should be sough to ensure that this can be carried out in the 5 year time frame.
6) Love grass should be on the weed list. This grass weed is as much a cause of combustible material as Veldt grass.
7) Appendix 3 – control guidelines for weeds in Gnangara Lake Reserve should be left out of the management plan. Better weed management methods are continually being developed and the method proposed may not be the best method for a particular weed in 5 years.
8) The buffer zone provided by the vegetation around the lake is important to ensure the health of the lake and averting any potential future midge problems. The planned location of the limestone path around the lake should take these issues into consideration.
9) Limestone paths should be planned with all stakeholders. The Fire and Emergency Services Authority will be responsible for fighting fires and need to know the access tracks do provide them with adequate access to all areas. Using existing tracks would minimise bushland disturbance.
10) Anti-social behaviour centred around the toilet block deters people from using the area. The new toilet location should be suitably lit and patrolled or padlocked at night to ensure that the same problems do not arise at the new facility.
11) Interpretative signage needs to be greatly improved. The community needs to know that it is an important conservation area and an area for passive recreation.
12) The retention of the existing house for a community/environmental centre should be looked at considering the rapidly expanding Landsdale population there will be a need for more meeting rooms for groups.
|
1) Acknowledged
2) The fragmented ownership of the reserve has made it difficult to achieve a co-ordinated response to the area. The Management Plan has recognised this and recommends that the vesting orders and responsibilities should be reviewed with an aim of closer integration with the proposed Gnangara Park or as part of a broader Regional Park.
3) The anti-social behaviour caused by off-road vehicle drivers was one of the prime reasons for developing the management plan. Control of vehicle access is considered to be a very high priority
4) The priority areas for rehabilitation were intended to identify the sites at which most effort should be focused, although effort may also be expended elsewhere. Rehabilitation works, however, are likely to extend significantly beyond the lifespan of the management plan. The proposed rehabilitation areas do, however, present a target to work towards.
5) The City, DPI and CALM will be responsible for implementation of action items as they relate to their area of land. The City will certainly investigate (in conjunction with the DPI, CALM and community groups) any potential sources of funding to implement the proposed works. A budget allocation for fencing has already been made for this financial year.
6) The species on the weed list were identified in the flora and vegetation survey undertaken by ATA Environmental. While the survey was conducted in spring to record annuals, it is possible that species were missed owing to the random nature of plant distribution. If additional species are identified then they may be added to the list.
7) The City does not yet have any weed management procedures or standards (although several policies and guidelines are in preparation). By including this information the management plan can become a one stop source of information. As better methods of control are identified these should obviously be used.
8) Healthy peripheral vegetation has long been recognised as being essential to maintaining wetland condition and health. The Water and Rivers Commission recommend various buffer widths to Conservation Category wetlands (such as Gnangara Lake) depending on the activity, with 50m “critical influence” buffers generally being the minimum. The path is proposed to use existing tracks and those that will be necessary to adjoining private property.
9) The Management Plan was prepared in consultation with the other landholders (DPI and CALM) and the WRC. The City’s Fire Management Officer has reviewed the Management Plan and considers the fire management measures that are proposed to be acceptable.
10) The Management Plan notes the location of existing toilet facilities in the toilet block and house. Funds have been allocated for the removal of the existing toilet block. The Management Plan recommends that consideration be given to using the house for an environmental centre. This will require detailed consideration of its design to ensure its suitability for the intended purpose. This will necessitate compliance with the relevant requirements (Building Codes of Australia). It is probable that the existing effluent disposal standards are inadequate for the location adjacent to wetland. The Management Plan does not state that new toilet blocks should be constructed. Rather it indicates a location where it may be chosen to locate such a facility. If a new toilet block is ultimately to be built it will have to comply with the WRC’s Underground Water Pollution Control Area requirements and have appropriate provisions to ensure that vandalism and anti-social behaviour does not become a problem again.
11) It is agreed that signage at the site is inadequate and can be vastly improved. The location and type of signs may be evaluated by the co-ordinating committee that is to be established to oversee the implementation of the Management Plan.
12) See comment at 10 above. |
5 |
Friends of Koondoola Regional Bushland (FKRB) |
1) The FKRB support the proposal that the area should be placed under the management of a single agency, preferably CALM, and integrated into the Regional Park. This should be done as soon as possible.
2) Strict access control is essential to prevent further degradation
3) Water quality and levels in the lake to be improved.
4) Conservation should be the primary goal of Gnangara Lake Reserve.
5) All stakeholders should have a say in the management of the area.
6) Excavation of the lake should not be considered as an option.
7) Rehabilitation should focus on removing human disturbance and allowing the bushland to regenerate itself. Weed control should be a high priority with planting a last resort.
8) Placement of rubbish bins should be limited as they are known to start fires.
9) Fire access tracks should be installed in consultation with the Fire and Emergency Service Authority of WA and use existing tacks where possible.
10) Bridle trails in Gnangara Lake Reserve should be restricted to providing access to bridle trails in Gnangara Pine Plantation bridle trail.
11) Vegetation around the lake is very important to assist in keeping a healthy ecosystem. The vegetation should be retained and weed species removed around the whole of the lake margin.
12) Support the proposal to remove the existing toilet block with consideration for relocation to another area.
13) Signage and letting the broader community know about the area is important to ensuring the areas long term conservation. Encouragement of a community group to assist in managing the area is a great asset and in many cases are the people that know what is going on, report fires etc.
14) If the City is take on the management of the site in the short to medium term until a single agent is appointed then assistance from the State and Federal Governments should be sought.
|
1) Acknowledged
2) The environmental damage and anti-social behaviour caused by off-road vehicles was one of the reasons why the Management Plan was prepared. Access control is considered a high priority.
3) The wetland has been suffering from poor water quality and low water levels for a considerable period. The Management Plan has been prepared with the aim of identifying recommendations to improve this. Improving the status of water quality and levels will be a long term project.
4) Management Strategy P1 intends to ensure that this will happen.
5) The preparation of the Management Plan has tried to involve as many of the relevant stakeholders as possible including the DPI, CALM. WRC, members of the City’s conservation Advisory Committee and nearby landholders. Management Strategy P5 recommends that a co-ordinating group be established to oversee the implementation of the management plan. It is envisaged that agency and community involvement will be central to the implementation.
6) Section 4.2 of the Management Plan discusses options for increasing water level, of which excavation is noted as a potential method. The text then notes that this is not considered to be a viable option owing to the permanent alteration that will take place. A submission by the WRC has also noted concerns with this suggestion owing to potential disturbance of acid sulphate soils. The text will be modified to include reference to acid sulphate soils.
7) Rehabilitation is inextricably linked to weed control and will therefore need to take this into account. The actual methods used in any particular location will be highly dependant on resource availability and bushland condition.
8) The location and number of bins may be evaluated at the implementation phase. The committee that is to be formed to oversee the implementation may be able to provide input on this issue.
9) See the Council’s Comment and Response to a similar issue raised in submission 2 (by Lake Gnangara Conservation and Community Group) item number 8.
10) An intent of the GLR Management Plan has been to raise the ecological and social values of the site. By allowing horse riding to take place it is possible that it may raise the social values of the area and contribute to environmental awareness of the area amongst the horse riding population. It is acknowledged that horses can contribute to environmental degradation through trampling, spread of dieback, nutrient input and weed invasion (through manure). However, it is considered that the potential benefits to the community warrant the development of a bridle trail. The bridle trail has been specifically located for the following reasons; · To allow access to Gnangara Park (CALM pine plantation) and provide an interesting circuit around the wetland. · To use the existing firebreaks so that no clearing will be necessary. · To restrict access from the portion of the site which is dieback free (though part of the circuit does go through an uninterpretable area) · To minimise access over the Priority 1 portion of the Underground Water Pollution Control Area. · To restrict access from the central portion of bushland (eastern side), which is considered to be in good health. Management Strategy R10 recommends that an annual review of the horse riding and dog exercise areas should take place. Should problems arise, the review may determine that a reconsideration may be necessary.
11) The importance of healthy peripheral vegetation, and hence rehabilitation, to wetlands has been known for a long time.
12) See Council Comment and Response to submission 4 (Alice Stubber), Item 10.
14) See Council Comment and Response to Submission 4 (Alice Stubber) Item 5.
|
6 |
Department of Conservation and Land Management |
1) Management zones (section 3.4) - Part of Gnangara Lake Reserve is reserved as multiple use State Forest on which wildflower picking is permitted. At present no changes on tenure of the area are proposed as it provides an important resource to the wildflower industry.
2) Integrated management of GLR and adjacent areas (section 3.5 – management strategy P4). - This section states that the vesting and purpose of the area should be amended to ensure the entire GLR is managed as an “A” Class Conservation and Recreation Reserve as part of a broader Regional park, with CALM as the managing authority. While this strategy has merit there can be no guarantee that this is the path that the State Government will endorse in the future. It may be appropriate to modify this to reflect that this option will be investigated by the agencies involved in the Management Plan.
3) Gnangara Lake (section 4.2) - Instead of the text stating “lobby CALM/Forest Products Commission to continue to remove trees from the pine plantation east of the lake” it should reflect that the option of pine plantation removal will be investigated by liaising with CALM, WRC and the Forest Products Commission.
4) Dieback (section 4.6 – management strategy C7) - Treatment with phosphite would normally be considered in circumstances where there are species of particular conservation significance. The Department does not consider that the application of phosphite is warranted owing to the widespread nature of the current infestation and the cost involved.
5) Pets and introduced fauna (section 4.7) - CALM does not advocate 1080 baiting in urban areas owing to the risk involved. There are only 2 areas in the Perth Metropolitan Area that are baited, with both of these protected by vermin proof fencing. It would be more appropriate to outline that feral animal control programmes would be investigated, rather than defining baiting programmes that are unlikely to take place.
6) Management Strategies R6 and R9 - CALM cannot make a commitment within a set time frame to install dual use paths and bridle trails within the area of State Forest to the east of Gnangara Lake. At present CALM is in the process of implementing the Gnangara Park Concept Plan and although these paths are likely to be installed in the future it is not a priority action identified in the Concept Plan. |
1) It is acknowledged that CALM is responsible for managing the Wildflower Industry, and that the portion of State Forest in GLR has significant economic value in this regard. It is also acknowledged that CALM’s requirements of the Wildflower Industry are intended to ensure the long term sustainability of species and the industry. The proposed management zone of Conservation and Protection, which incorporates the State Forest area managed by CALM, is aimed at improving habitat protection, rehabilitation of degraded areas and weed management. The City, however, respects the responsibilities of CALM in regard to such activities. Recommendation R5 will therefore be modified to prohibit access for off-road vehicles and restrict the wildflower industry to the area reserved for State Forest.
2) The proposed amended Recommendation is considered to have merit owing to the high level negotiations that will be involved. The wording of management strategy P4 will be amended to reflect the issue raised.
3) The proposed amended Recommendation is considered to have merit owing to the high level negotiations that will be involved. (See also Submission No. 3 from the WRC – Item 6). The wording of the text will bemodified to reflect the issue raised.
4) The recommendation will be removed from the Management Plan owing to the potential costs involved and lack of plants of specific conservation significance that are susceptible to dieback. This does not necessarily mean that the phosphite spraying should not be considered at some point in the future.
5) Health and safety issues are of considerable concern to the City. Recommendation C9 will be removed from the Management Plan.
6) It is acknowledged that CALM’s limited resources for conservation management should be distributed in areas of greatest need. It is also acknowledged that this resourcing is dependant on yearly budget allocations and that time frames need to allow for such budgeting issues. However, the construction of dual use paths and bridle trails is considered to be an important issue. It may be possible to undertake the works in a staged approach commencing from the western boundary. It may also be possible to source external funding (ie Natural Heritage Trust 2) to assist with construction. Recommendations R6 and R9 remain the same. However, the text of the Management Plan will be altered to indicate that it may be possible to undertake the works in a staged approach. |
7 |
Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) |
1) The DPI would like to note that while the WA Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for the Metropolitan Region Scheme and may acquire land pursuant to the Act that it does not consider itself to be a long term land manager. As such it would prefer that its land at Gnangara Lake Reserve become a Crown Reserve and be vested in a management agency such as CALM or the Council. It would, however, be prepared to be involved in a combined management arrangement in the short to medium term.
2) The section of the plan headed Planning Context (section 1.4) lists a number of policies which affect the area but seems to exclude the fact that the study area is reserved for Parks and Recreation in the Metropolitan Region Scheme. |
1) The role of the WAPC and DPI in acquiring land pursuant to the Scheme is acknowledged. The City acknowledged the position of the DPI and its statement that it does not consider itself to be the long term manager of the site. The support of the DPI to be involved in short to medium term management of the site is acknowledged. Any proposed changes in the management agency and purpose will be the result of negotiations involving the DPI, CALM, City of Wanneroo and Department of Land Administration. This is the subject of Recommendation P4.
2) A discussion of land use implications and tenure is noted in section 2.1.2. and shown graphically in Figure 2. The text has been amended, however, to note that the site is reserved for Parks and Recreation and State Forest under the Metropolitan Region Town Planning Scheme. |
8 |
Department of Land Administration (DOLA) |
1) DOLA supports the draft Management Plan and would support the inclusion of Unallocated Crown Land (UCL) and the sections of Steel and Alexander Road into one consolidated reserve under the management of the City. |
1) The support of DOLA for these modifications is acknowledged. The proposed alterations and management orders may be examined as part of the proposed management strategy P4. |
9 |
Department of Indigenous Affairs |
1) There are four registered aboriginal heritage sites in the Gnangara Lake Reserve area, including the wetland itself. It is possible that there are other sites that are not yet documented or entered on the Aboriginal Sites Register. The Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 protects all Aboriginal heritage sites in WA whether they are known or not. Any work that is planned as a result of the management plan is likely to result in a breach of Section 17 of the Act unless consent is obtained under Section 18 of the Act. |
1) The management plan has noted the presence of these heritage sites and includes a recommendation (C14) to ensure the implementation of management measures is in accordance with the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. Additionally, recommendation P5 recommends that a co-ordinating group be formed to oversee the implementation of the management plan., and it is envisaged that aboriginal representation would be present on this committee. The management plan will be modified to include a map showing the location of the Aboriginal heritage sites. |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 5 -
PAGE 1 OF 3
MODIFICATIONS RECOMMENDED TO THE GNANGARA LAKE
RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Water Corp Comments
1. Include a map of the Underground Water Pollution Control Area boundaries in the management plan and note this imposes land use restrictions.
2. Include a map of the location of Water Corporations production bore and buffer as noted on Water Corp submission. Also note the implications in terms of land use restrictions.
Lake Gnangara Conservation Community Group Comments
3. Modify recommendation C3 (Progressively rehabilitate disturbed and degraded areas initially focussing efforts in areas that have greatest potential to impact on better quality vegetation areas) to include a reference to using Local natives where practicable.
Water and Rivers Commission Comments
4. From comment 2 of the WRC’s submission (Section 1.4 and 4.2 of the report) - The GLRMP notes that the Gnangara Mound Crown Land EPP set a minimum groundwater level of 41.3m. However, conditions have been revised since then with a revised minimum of 42m AHD set in 1996. The EPP has not yet been updated to reflect this. Modify text of sections 1.4 and 4.2 accordingly to refer to WRC’s preferred minimum water levels 42m.
5. From comment 3 of the WRC’s submission – include reference to the potential decline in water quality caused by diatomaceous earth mining and acid sulphate soils. Most appropriate section is probably 4.2, though discussion of mining also occurs in section 6.2.
6. From WRC comment 6 - Change dot point 4 at bottom of page 28 to “Liaise with the WRC regarding the lowering of groundwater abstraction from public and private bores in close proximity to the lake and provide a greater water allocation for Gnangara Lake.”
7. From WRC comment 7 -- include the ANZECC 2000 Water Quality Guidelines from tables 3.3.6 and 3.3.7 into Table 2 of the management plan. The text discussing the data in section 2.2.4 will need modifying also.
8. From WRC comment 8 - WRC has noted that the site is part of a priority 1, 2 and 3 UWPCA. Enclose a diagram showing these boundaries, provide some reference to land use activities permitted in priority areas (may be appropriate to include the WRC’s draft guidelines on permitted recreational activities in water source areas - most appropriate section is probably under 2.2.3.
CALM’s Comments
9. From submission 1 - amend Recommendation R5 (and text at section 5.4) to state “Prohibit access for off-road vehicles and restrict the wildflower industry to the area reserved for state forest” .
ATTACHMENT 5 - PAGE 2 OF 3
10. From section 3.5 management strategy P4 – CALM submission 2 - Modify recommendation to “Seek to amend the vesting orders…” CALM have suggested this direction owing to the high level of negotiations involved. The text at section 3.5 will require modifying aswell.
11. From section 4.2 CALM submission 3 - modify the text in dot point 2 to refer to “continue liaise with the Forest Products Commission, Department of Conservation and Land Management and Water and Rivers Commission regarding the removal of pine trees in the area east of the lake.”
12. From CALM comment number 4 - Delete recommendation C7
13. From CALM comment number 5 - Delete recommendation C9 and modify text at section 4.7. Change last 2 sentences of 2nd last paragraph to note that CALM doesn’t generally undertake baiting in urban areas owing to the risks associated with it. The 2 areas in Perth that are baited have vermin proof fencing around them.
14. From CALM submission number 6 - modify text at section 5.4 under the heading “cycle and pedestrian access” – p. 44. CALM has noted that they may not be able to set a time frame for installing the Dual Use Path. The text should therefore note that it may be possible to implement the path on a staged basis.
DPI Comments
15. From comment 2 - It has not been noted anywhere in the text that the site is reserved for Parks and Recreation and State Forest. An amendment to this effect should be made under section 2.1.2.
DIA Comments
16. Include a map of the heritage site locations and text to reflect impact.
Other Changes
17. Change the priority status of recommendation P4 from “Medium to Low” to “High” given the regional significance of the area, the fact that the existing fragmented ownership has contributed to current problems and given the City’s limited resourcing and expertise available to implement many of the strategies.
18. Change priority status of recommendation C9 to “Low” and change wording of recommendation to “consider developing measures to reduce the impact of feral animals on native fauna”. The text of section 4.7 should also be modified to include reference to the importance of pets as companion animals to people.
19. Delete recommendation C11 - this can be considered in the preparation of a Fire Management and Response Plan
20. Expand Table 1 (p.7) to include all of the land parcels in GLR and modify the text accordingly.
21. page 33 - second last dot point - Change “All dieback free remnants should be protected from infection, even if they are small and isolated” to “All dieback free remnants should be protected from infection where practicable, even if they are small and isolated”,
|
||||
|
22. page 8 - section 2.1.4 - first paragraph - last sentence - Change “The area is also used as dumping area for household refuse and abandoned vehicles” to “The area is also used illegally as dumping area for household refuse and abandoned vehicles”.
23. Page 49 delete last sentence – “Examples of the type of commercial activities that may occur within the reserve include a kiosk or cafe, or hire facilities such as canoes”
24. Page 58 - Include a statement to the effect that environmental restoration of the site will be a long term project involving the landholders and the community working together over many years extending beyond the life-span of this management plan.
25. Change rating for recommendation C1 to Low.
26. Delete recommendation P6 - this is essentially a repeat of Recommendation P5.
27. Recommendation C6 - Change recommendation from “Follow suitable hygiene practices during implementation of works” to “Follow suitable Phytophthora dieback hygiene practices during implementation of works”.
28. Change rating of Recommendation R12 to Medium.
29. Change rating of Recommendation I5 to Medium.
30. Delete text on Figure 7 stating “subject to settlement” - as settlement has been finalised.
31. Change all references to “City of Wanneroo with CALM and DPI” as the responsible agency in the Management Strategy table to “ALL”.
32. Change the responsible agency for Recommendations C1 and C2 from “City of Wanneroo” to “CALM”.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 6
TABLE 6
INDICATIVE COSTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF WORKS
Management Proposal |
Estimated Requirements |
Cost per unit * |
Estimated Total Cost |
Car Parking |
750m2 (25 bays) |
Concrete / Asphalt: $25/m2 |
$18,750 |
Limestone: $7/m2 |
$5,250 |
||
Road Access
|
~200m |
Concrete / Asphalt: $150/m |
$30,000 |
Limestone: $50/m |
$10,000 |
||
DUP |
5800m |
Limestone: $10/m |
$58,000 |
Walk Paths |
2400m |
Limestone: $10/m |
$24,000 |
Fencing |
9400m |
Ringlock (1.2m): $10/m |
$94,000 |
Bollards |
650m |
1.5m, 600mm in: $15/m |
$9,750 |
Vehicle Access Point |
13 access points |
Collapsible Bollard: $900ea |
$11,700 |
Removable Bollard: $150ea |
$1,950 |
||
Steel Mesh Gate: $500ea |
$6,500 |
||
Bridle Trails/Fire Breaks (ripping of soil, minor clearing) |
5900m |
$0.15/m |
$885 |
BBQ (standard two plate electric in brick surround) |
2 units |
$7,000 per unit |
$14,000 |
Tables/Seating (on concrete slab) |
6 units |
$1,000 per unit |
$6,000 |
Play Equipment (pit and equipment) |
1 unit |
$25,000-$35,000 per unit |
$25,000-$35,000 |
Signage (Sign and posts) |
2 large (80x60cm) |
$400ea |
$800 |
10 small (40x30cm) |
$150ea |
$1,500 |
|
Rehabilitation (development of detailed Rehabilitation Plan and implementation of revegetation / weed control) |
~400,000m2 |
$2.50/m2 |
$1,000,000 |
Note: * Estimates identified above do not include costs of on-going maintenance and monitoring
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S02/0008V01
File Name: AARevoft.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a review of the title and terms of reference of the City’s Conservation Advisory Committee.
Background
Council, at its meeting on 14 November 2000, resolved to endorse the formation of a Conservation Advisory Committee (CAC) and the terms of reference for this committee. It also required a review of the committee’s achievements and future scope after it had been in operation for 12 months (item W354-11/00 refers).
The first meeting of the CAC was held on 24 April 2001 and regular meetings have been held since this time. The elected member representatives on the committee are Councillors Hughes and McNamara.
Detail
The existing terms of reference for the CAC are included as Attachment 1 to this report. Under these terms of reference the purpose of the CAC is to:
· Provide a means of two-way communication and participation between the City and the community on conservation related matters;
· Advise and assist Council on the development of strategies for conservation and priorities for management; and
· Identify problems of an environmental nature and where possible formulate strategies to address those issues.
A review of the terms of reference has been undertaken in consultation with the CAC and the revised terms of reference are set out in the recommendation to this report. The revised terms of reference seek to improve on the existing by broadening the scope of the objectives and thus make the Committee more effective. The revised terms of reference also address rotation of members. In particular, the major changes include:
· A change in the name of the Committee to the Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC);
· Changes to the objectives of the Committee to reflect the identification of environmental issues and development of strategies to address these issues;
· The introduction of a 2 year period for membership on the Committee;
· A mechanism for the staggered review of the membership, to ensure no more than half of the membership positions are reviewed at any one time;
· A provision enabling retiring members to be eligible to reapply;
· A provision to retain all current CAC members on the new EAC until the first membership review in April 2003 (which represents 2 years after the initial formation of the CAC).
Consultation
The revised terms of reference have been developed in close consultation with the CAC and were endorsed by the committee at its meeting on 14th August 2002.
Comment
Achievements of the Committee
The CAC spent the initial stages of its existence familiarising itself with Council activities and responsibilities. It experienced some difficulty at that time owing to the lack of strategic direction in respect to environmental matters. The CAC has since established itself and has been actively involved with a variety of issues. Some of the more major projects the CAC has been involved in include the:
· Extensive involvement in the preparation of the City’s Local Environmental Strategy;
· Review of the City’s proposed Weed Management Policy;
· Review of the City’s draft Tree Preservation Policy;
· Consideration of management issues for Gnangara Lake Reserve;
· Obtaining grants from the Perth Biodiversity Project for bushland management in co-operation with the City of Joondalup; and
· Preparation of generic bushland management guidelines.
Scope of the Committee
The review of the terms of reference reflect the fact that the CAC has been considering issues that go beyond the scope of “conservation” and have a broader “environmental” focus. Conservation can be considered to be the management of site specific, localised issues and while consideration of these issues is necessary, it may result in the exclusion of broader ranging environmental issues which have the potential for a greater environmental impact. The effective management of “conservation” issues therefore requires a broader focus which may enable strategic resolution of issues rather than responding to individual problems.
The City recognised the importance of this broader approach when it resolved to prepare its Local Environmental Strategy. The CAC was extensively involved in the preparation of this strategy, through several workshops and provided constructive and effective feedback for the improvement of the document. If the CAC had been strictly concerned with conservation issues only, then its involvement in this process would not have lead to such a comprehensive document.
Membership
The existing CAC terms of reference provide no mechanism for membership review and do not stipulate a membership period.
This is likely to encourage a situation where serving members may stagnate and also does not provide a mechanism where other community members have the opportunity to participate.
The revised terms of reference propose that membership be restricted to a 2 year period with retiring members eligible to reapply. It is also proposed to review only half of the membership at any one time to enable a continuity of knowledge and functions of the Committee. The existing CAC members will automatically become members of the EAC, until the first review takes place. This is proposed to occur in April 2003, which is 2 years after the initial establishment of the CAC.
Statutory Compliance
Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act allows Council to establish committees. Section 5.9 of this Act allows Council to form committees comprised of Council members, employees and other persons.
Strategic Implications
The function of the proposed Environmental Advisory Committee is consistent with Goal 1 of the City’s Strategic Plan, regarding “Environmental Sustainability”. In particular, the Strategic Plan recommends that the City should foster a culture of environmental awareness, ownership and action within the community and the organisation by encouraging community participation in the protection and conservation of environmental assets.
The establishment of the Committee is also consistent with the City’s Local Environmental Strategy, which recommends that the City should encourage dialogue between Council and community.
Policy Implications
There are no direct policy implications relating to the proposed EAC, however, it is envisaged that the committee would be involved in the discussion and preparation of various environmental related policies and strategies. This would continue on from involvement of the CAC on issues including the Local Environmental Strategy, Draft Tree Preservation Policy and Draft Weed Management Policy.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the change of name of the Conservation Advisory Committee to the Environmental Advisory Committee.
2. NOTES that the membership of the existing Conservation Advisory Committee will be transferred to the new Environmental Advisory Committee.
3. ENDORSES the terms of reference of the Environmental Advisory Committee as follows:
Name:
|
Environmental Advisory Committee |
||
Aims:
|
1.1 To provide a means of participatory two way communication between the community and the City of Wanneroo on environmental issues.
1.2 To assist Council with the identification of environmental issues and the development of strategies relating to these issues. |
||
Membership: |
2.1 All members of the former Conservation Advisory Committee will automatically continue as members of the Environmental Advisory Committee.
2.2 Subject to clause 2.1, the Committee shall consist of the following endorsed members: · Two elected Council members as nominated by Council · The Director Technical Services or his nominee · The Director Planning and Development or his nominee · A maximum of 14 representatives from the community.
2.3 The Chair shall be nominated at the first meeting of the committee.
2.5 Membership shall be by appointment of the Council.
2.6 Membership shall be for a period of two years, however, retiring members are eligible to reapply. The first period of reapplication shall be April 2003, which represents two years after the formation of the former Conservation Advisory Committee.
2.7 At the first membership review (clause 2.5) the Council may appoint half of the members for a 1 year period and half for a 2 year period.
|
||
Operating Procedures:
|
3.1 The Committee will meet on a regular basis as determined by the Committee.
3.2 The Chairperson is responsible for the proper conduct of the Committee. 3.3 All endorsed members (or the proxy attending in lieu of the endorsed member) of the Committee have one vote. In the event of a tie the Chairperson shall have the casting vote and simple majority shall prevail.
3.4 The Committee has the authority to establish working groups as required to address specific purposes of the Committee.
3.5 The Committee has the authority to second individuals from outside of the Committee on a voluntary basis, for their expert advice.
|
||
Minutes: |
4.1 Minutes are to be taken at each meeting and will be forwarded to all members and elected representatives within seven days of the meeting date.
4.2 Minutes will also be made available to members of the public on request.
|
||
Delegated Authority:
|
5.1 The Committee has no delegated power and has no authority to implement its recommendations without the approval of Council.
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAGE 1 OF 3
CITY OF WANNEROO
CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TERMS OF REFERENCE
1. THE COMMITTEE
1.1 The name of the Committee shall be the Conservation Advisory Committee (hereafter referred to as the “Committee” in this document), appointed as an advisory Committee to the City of Wanneroo Council under Part 5 – Administration of the Local Government Act 1995. The City of Wanneroo in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, grants the powers pertaining to these Terms of Reference to the Conservation Advisory Committee as an appointed committee of Council.
2. DEFINITIONS
The term “conservation” is defined as the preservation of biodiversity and management of the environment within and adjacent to the City of Wanneroo:
2.1 Wetlands and lakes;
2.2 Coastal foreshore;
2.3 Remnant representations of bushland communities;
2.4 Significant stands of trees;
2.5 Public Open Space vested with Council;
2.6 Regionally significant features identified by other statutory organisations and as adopted by Council;
2.7 Other significant landforms, landscapes and features;
2.8 The physical environment.
3. OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the Committee is to:
3.1 Provide a means of two way communication and participation between the community and the City of Wanneroo on matters pertaining to conservation.
3.2 Assist and advise Council with the development of strategies for conservation and priorities for management, which may include but not be limited to:
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAGE 2 OF 3
· Investigate and recommend a mapping database system conforming with relevant guidelines and strategies for management.
· Through a public education programme, promote and enhance awareness within the community of the values and importance of conservation and proper management.
· Promote the values of and educate local representatives of the community to monitor and report on the status of local conservation areas.
· Assist peak community groups in preparing plans, sourcing funding and implementing management strategies.
3.3 Identify problems of an environmental nature and where possible formulate strategies to address those issues.
4. MEMBERSHIP
4.1 The Committee shall consist of the following endorsed members:
4.2 A nominated p[roxy may attend in place of the endorsed representative member.
Maximum Total (20)
5. MANAGEMENT
5.1 The Committee has the authority to establish sub-working committee’s as required to address specific purposes of the Committee
5.2 The Committee has the authority to second individuals from outside of the Committee on a voluntary basis, for their expert advice.
5.3 The Chairperson is responsible for the proper conduct of the Committee.
5.4 The Committee has no delegated power and has no authority to implement its recommendations without the approval of Council.
5.5 The Committee may recruit members according to the Terms of Reference.
5.6 The Committee minutes will be circulated to Council.
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAGE 3 OF 3
6. MEETINGS
6.1 The Committee will meet on a regular basis determined by the Committee.
6.2 The Committee will annually elect a Chairperson from the elected Council members.
6.3 All endorsed members (or the proxy attending in lieu of the endorsed member) of the Committee have one vote. In the event of a tie the Chairperson shall have the casting vote and simple majority shall prevail.
6.4 The Chairperson will preside at all meetings. In the absence of the Chairperson the Chair will be assumed by a person elected by the quorum.
6.5 Matters requiring Council consideration will be subject to separate specific reports to Council.
6.6 The Committee will be supported by a staff member from the City of Wanneroo.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S/0103V01
File Name: AAEasWan.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a draft Project Brief prepared for the East Wanneroo Rural Land Use and Water Management Review (‘the Review’).
Background
A meeting was held on 28 February 2002 between City representatives and the Hon Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to discuss a range of planning issues relating to the City’s rural area. The outcome of the meeting was agreement that an inter-departmental working group comprising technical officers of this City and relevant State government agencies should be established to review and report to the City, Western Australian Planning Commission and the Minister, upon the adequacy of the present planning framework applying to the rural area. The working group was formed and commenced its task.
In July 2002, the Minister wrote to this City, advising that she was now of the view that a more senior group should deal with the matter, drawing upon the work of the technical officers group. The Minister was advised that her proposal was supported and that the City would be pleased to work with the relevant State government officials concerned to develop the terms of reference (or Project Brief) for the new group.
A preliminary draft Project Brief for the study was discussed with Elected Members at the Policy Forum meeting held on 10 September 2002.
Detail
Following consultation with this City and other relevant agencies, the Department for Planning and Infrastructure has now submitted a revised draft Project Brief for formal consideration by Council (refer Attachment 1).
Consultation
The draft Project Brief provides for full community consultation, including the holding of a seminar as an initial step, to consider (amongst other things), the draft Project Brief itself.
Comment
The draft Project Brief is considered to be generally satisfactory, providing for adequate involvement by this City and the community, and aimed at achieving an effective integration of the land use and water planning and management systems affecting the rural area.
However, one aspect of the draft Project Brief which is considered to warrant modification concerns the process for resolution of any differences of position which may arise between the various agencies involved, including this City, and which the agencies concerned cannot resolve between themselves. Provision should be made for the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to be able to mediate in such cases.
The draft Project Brief would also be improved through the inclusion of a plan which defines the boundary of the ‘Project Area’. (It currently only provides a general description of the Project Area, being that it “… encompasses the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Rural zoned lands and the Parks and Recreation reserves in East Wanneroo between the State Forrest 65 and Wanneroo Road and north of Gnangara Road. It does not include the existing Urban and Industrial zones”. In this respect, it would be appropriate to ensure that the Project Area includes the pockets of rural land situated west of Wanneroo Road at Pippidinny and north of Romeo Road, Alkimos.
It may be noted that under Section 6 of the draft Project Brief, a first initiative for the Project will be the holding of a seminar involving participants from the public and private sector, the purpose being to obtain feedback on the draft Project Brief and to identify major stakeholders, issues and commitment in the undertaking of the Review.
A number of committees are proposed and it would be appropriate that consideration now be given to who should be the City representatives on those committees:
· Steering Committee (see page 6 of draft Project Brief);
· Community Consultative Committee (see page 7 of draft Project Brief). It may be noted that this lists the Mayor as Co-Chair, and ‘selected Ward Councillors’ also being on this committee.
City officers will continue to participate in the technical working group and will also assist with administration of the Minister for Planning’s Community Consultative Committee.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The outcome of the Review may lead to proposals for changes to statutory instruments such as the Metropolitan Region Scheme and City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2.
The undertaking of the Review will involve issues associated with the environmental sustainability, healthy communities and economic development goals of the City’s Strategic Plan. The latter goal has a number of objectives which are particularly relevant: the supporting of a viable rural industry and the development of the tourism industry.
This Review will also enable the finalisation of the City’s Local Rural Strategy.
Policy Implications
The Review will entail an assessment of all City policies which are relevant to the rural area, particularly the Interim Local Rural Strategy (which is currently being applied as Council policy, and which includes the rural subdivision policy).
Financial Implications
The Review will be a significant undertaking and there may be some funding requirements arising for this City which will be the subject of separate Council consideration.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the draft Project Brief forming Attachment 1 to this report, noting that it shall be subject to:
a) Further consideration during the course of the seminar proposed to be held at the commencement of the Review;
b) It first being modified to include provision for the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to act as mediator in the case of any agencies involved, including the City, not being able to reach agreement upon any matters needing to be resolved during the course of the Review.
c) It including a plan showing the proposed boundary of the Project Area, with the pockets of rural land located west of Wanneroo Road at Pippidinny and north of Romeo Road, Alkimos, being included within that boundary.
2. NOMINATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY two City of Wanneroo representatives to serve on the Minister for Planning’s Steering Committee, being:
· Cr ________________ (with Cr ________________ as deputy); and
· The Chief Executive Officer (with the Director Planning and Development as deputy).
3. NOMINATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following Elected Members to serve as the City of Wanneroo Ward Councillor representatives on the Minister for Planning’s Community Consultative Committee:
· Cr _____________ (with Cr ____________ as deputy) (North Ward);
· Cr _____________ (with Cr ____________ as deputy) (Central Ward);
· Cr _____________ (with Cr ____________ as deputy) (Wanneroo Ward);
4. NOTES that the Mayor is to be a Co-Chair of the Minister for Planning’s Community Consultative Committee.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
File Ref: SD116582V01
File Name: BARefofD.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider authorising a refund of cash payments made by the Department of Housing and Works (Landstart) to secure construction of grade separated pedestrian crossings in exchange for a letter of undertaking from the Department.
Background
Part 11 and Schedule 10 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) require the various land owners in the Clarkson-Butler Planning District to contribute to, or construct various district distributor roads and grade separated pedestrian crossings. The Clarkson-Butler Planning District is divided into 4 cells as shown on Attachment 1.
The works to be funded or constructed by the land owners are Marmion Avenue, Connolly Drive, Neerabup Avenue, Hester Avenue and Lukin Drive, as well as 21 grade separated pedestrian crossings, planned for strategic locations along these roads.
The land owners obligations have been apportioned on a pro-rata basis, according to the area each landholding bears to the total land in each Cell and the length of road and number of pedestrian crossings in each cell.
Detail
The Landstart landholding in Cell 1 comprises Lots 2 & 1002, Quinns Rocks. The location of this land is shown on Attachment 1.
DPS2 requires Landstart to fund 0.66 kilometres of district distributor road and 0.53 grade separated pedestrian crossings in Cell 1.
Landstart has already developed all of Lot 2 and approximately 59 % of Lot 1002. It has constructed 0.66 kilometres of Marmion Avenue within the cell, which is equal to its total road construction obligation and has paid $130,398 in cash to secure its obligation for grade separated pedestrian crossings.
The type, number and location of the pedestrian crossings for the Clarkson-Butler Planning District is currently subject to review, with this review planned to be completed by the end of this financial year.
It is not appropriate for any new pedestrian crossings to be constructed until the review has been completed. In any case, Landstart’s contribution only equates to a portion of a crossing which would rely on a further contribution from other participating landowners before construction could take place.
Under these circumstances, Landstart has requested a refund of the cash contribution it has previously made to secure its grade separated pedestrian crossing obligations, on the basis of a letter of undertaking agreeing to contribute when requested by the City.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The objective of the City’s infrastructure contribution arrangements for the Clarkson-Butler Planning District is to provide a simple framework for the developing landowners to meet their obligations through construction works. Other forms of security such as cash payments, bank guarantees or undertakings are generally only accepted when construction is impractical such as in this case.
Letters of undertaking from government agencies have been accepted by the City in the past as an adequate form of security. Council is advised that DPS2 also contains provision to enable the City to recover any infrastructure payment that has not been paid. Under these circumstances it is considered that the City’s interests are adequately protected by a letter of undertaking.
Town Planning Scheme No. 20 Reserve Account 51.00.01.011.8351.0000 has been established for the infrastructure payments for the Clarkson-Butler Planning District. Council’s authorisation is required to withdraw money from the account, which currently contains $1,003,559. It is recommended that the cash contribution of $130 398 paid by Landstart be refunded in exchange for a letter of undertaking agreeing to complete its pedestrian crossing obligation when requested by the City.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Adequately securing obligations to infrastructure contributions is consistent with the healthy communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide for quality services and infrastructure.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The refund of the cash contribution previously paid by Landstart will be made from a reserve account established to hold infrastructure contributions for the Clarkson-Butler Planning District and will have no financial impact on the City’s current budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the payment of $130,398 to the Department of Housing and Works in refund of its cash contribution paid to the City toward grade separated pedestrian crossings for Cell 1 of the Clarkson-Butler Planning District, on the condition that the Department of Housing and Works provides a letter of undertaking to meet its full obligation for grade separated pedestrian crossings in Cell 1 when requested by the City.
2. NOTES that the payment referred to in 1. above is to be drawn from the City of Wanneroo’s Town Planning Scheme No. 20 – District Roads Headworks Reserve.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: TPS/0018V01
File Name: BAAPPFOR.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by CH Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application seeking an amendment to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) to rezone Lot 52 (59) Adams Road, Mariginiup, from General Rural to Special Rural Zone No. 13.
Applicant |
The Planning Group |
Owner |
DM & DS Cerinich |
Location |
Lot 52 (no. 59) Adams Road, Mariginiup |
Site Area |
3.6261 ha |
DPS 2 Zoning |
|
MRS Zoning |
Rural |
Background
The location of Lot 52 Adams Road in relation to the
surrounding area is shown on
Attachment 1. It should be noted that the subject land lies immediately
to the north of the existing Special Rural Zone No. 13 (‘Pennygum Grove’
estate) and immediately east of the existing Special Rural Zone No. 4 (‘Lake
Adams’ estate).
Special Rural Zone No. 13 was introduced in July 1997, with its northern boundary reflecting the extent of the land of the participating landowners at that time.
Lot 52 is currently used for equestrian purposes and contains an existing house, which provides accommodation for people who are looking after the horses on the property.
The applicant advises that the owner of Lot 52 purchased that property in 1993 with a view to eventually building a second house on the property, on the understanding that the City’s scheme and policy regarding second houses on rural lots at that time allowed this to occur.
With the introduction of DPS2 in July 2001 the new provisions relating to second dwellings on rural lots now require, amongst other things, a minimum lot size of 5 ha in this area. The owner’s only option available to build a second house is, therefore, to subdivide the present lot. To facilitate such a subdivision, the rezoning of the lot to Special Rural is sought.
Detail
The applicant seeks inclusion of Lot 52 Adams Road into Special Rural Zone No. 13 to facilitate a subdivision of the property, which will in turn enable a house to be built on a new lot which is planned to be created at the eastern end of the existing property.
The proposed plan of subdivision is shown on Attachment 2. It may be noted that this shows a possible longer-term subdivision of the western part of the property so that ultimately, three new lots would be created.
The applicant has submitted a detailed report in support of the proposal and a copy of this has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room.
The applicant’s report concludes that the proposed rezoning will:
· Logically extend the Special Rural zoning from the south;
· Enable the owners of the land to live a rural lifestyle;
· Not result in any significant environmental impacts;
· Be consistent with the relevant WAPC policies; and
· Be adequately serviced.
Consultation
The Town Planning Regulations 1967 requires that all Scheme Amendments undergo a process of advertising for public submissions, usually for a period of 42 days. This normally involves advertisements in the local paper, signs placed on site if appropriate, and notification of adjoining and nearby landowners and relevant state government agencies.
The Town Planning Amendment Regulations 1999 indicate that the WAPC’s consent to advertise an amendment is not required so long as it complies with the MRS and other planning policies and strategies. In this instance, given that there are no specific state policies or strategies relating to this proposal it is considered that WAPC consent for advertising should be obtained.
Comment
Broad Planning Framework
The applicant’s argument that this proposal should not be seen as an ad hoc rezoning proposal but rather a logical extension to the existing Special Rural zone to the south is considered valid.
In respect to the proposal fitting in with a broader planning framework, when the studies were undertaken in 1996/97 which led to the creation of Special Rural Zone No. 13, the applicant at that time was required to prepare a structure plan for the area generally between the southern boundary of the land proposed for rezoning at that time and Neaves Road. The resulting structure plan is shown on Attachment 3. At the time, Council ‘noted’ this plan.
The current proposal for Lot 52 is generally consistent with this earlier structure plan, however the following points should be noted:
1. The applicant proposes that rather than constructing the north-south road through the lot now, the owner will enter into a legal agreement with the City such that should the need for this road link indeed arise in the future (ie. through rezoning/subdivision proposals for the abutting land to the north), then the owners of Lot 52 shall provide for such a road link.
This arrangement would need to provide for the ceding of land for the road, the construction of the road and the extension of relevant services, such as reticulated water and power.
In order to properly protect the City’s interests, this approach would also need to be fully secured through the provision of a cash bond. Given the costs of administering this arrangement and the risk of the funds ultimately being insufficient to cover the required works, it is considered more appropriate that the road be extended, by the owner, at the subdivision stage.
The Development Guide Plan for the zone should be amended to show this road link.
2. The earlier structure plan shows a possible future east-west road running along the northern boundary of Lot 52, providing a link between Adams Road and a possible northern extension of Rousset Road to Neaves Road.
The future road design shown in the previous structure plan is however considered inefficient and would require a cost sharing arrangement to ensure that the costs associated with providing the road are shared on an equitable basis by the landowners of the broader area. It is possible that a more efficient and equitable road pattern could be designed to provide for the possible future rezoning and subdivision of the broader area, in a manner that would not require the provision of this east-west road link. Such a revised design is considered preferable. A revised structure plan showing the road pattern for the broader area would most appropriately be provided when a proposal for the broader area is being considered.
Equestrian Uses
Lot 52 is currently used for equestrian purposes and the applicant advises that the owner wishes to retain this use on the western portion of the property following the rezoning. (The Special Provisions currently applying to Special Rural Zone No. 13 do not permit keeping of horses).
The applicant proposes two options for facilitating this:
1. Including a Special Provision in DPS2 to enable this;
2. Continuing the use under the non-conforming use right provisions of DPS2, with the legal agreement previously referred including a clause requiring that the owner agrees to cease that use in 20 years time.
Option 2 is considered the preferred option, however the agreement should also include a provision that the use would also cease upon subdivision of the western part of the property into 2 new lots or when the land changes ownership.
Nearby Kennels and Catteries
The applicant advises that two kennel/cattery establishments exist on the two properties immediately to the north of Lot 52, but that these uses have not created any nuisance to the residents of Lot 52 to date.
It would be appropriate that the legal agreement include a requirement that memorials be placed on the titles of the new subdivisional lots, advising the owners of the presence of these uses and the possibility that they may cause occasional noise and other impacts.
Conclusion
The proposal for inclusion of the subject land in Special Rural Zone No. 13 is considered sound, subject to the issues identified above being addressed as proposed.
Statutory Compliance
This scheme amendment proposal will follow the procedures set out under the Town Planning Regulations.
In order to ensure that the City maintains the ability to not proceed with the amendment unless the legal agreement referred to above is finalised, it is necessary for the Council make its resolution to initiate the amendment “subject to” the legal agreement first being finalised.
Strategic Implications
This proposal is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan in terms of providing for greater lifestyle choice, and ensuring that environmental values are identified and protected.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ADVISES the applicant it is prepared to initiate an amendment to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone Lot 52 Adams Road, Mariginiup, from General Rural to Special Rural No. 13, upon the landowners entering into a legal agreement with the City which include the following landowner obligations:
a) to provide for the northern extension of Pennygum Place (land and construction) through Lot 52, together with the extension of the other servicing infrastructure in that road (including reticulated water, power, telephone etc) when Lot 52 is first subdivided.
b) to include memorials or similar records upon title of the new lots to be created, advising the owners of those new lots of the presence of the kennel and cattery establishments situated to the north of Lot 52, and the possibility of occasional impacts upon the proposed lots of noise and similar impacts from those establishments.
c) to cease the keeping of horses on the property, either within 20 years of the gazettal of the amendment to District Planning Scheme No. 2, at the time of subdivision of the western part of Lot 52 or when the ownership of Lot 52 (or part thereof) changes, whichever is the sooner.
2. Subject to the landowners first entering into the legal agreement referred to in 1, above,
a) In pursuance of section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act (as amended) PREPARES Amendment No. 18 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
i) rezone Lot 52 Adams Road, Mariginiup from General Rural to Special Rural No. 13;
ii) amend the Description of Locality for Special Rural Zone No. 13 in Schedule 13 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to include reference to Lot 52 Adams Road, Mariginiup;
iii) amend the Development Guide Plan for Special Rural Zone No. 13 to include Lot 52 Adams Road, Mariginiup and to show a subdivision pattern for that lot in accordance with the pattern shown on Attachment No. 2 of this report, with Pennygum Place being shown extended through the lot.
b) SUBMITS Amendment No. 18 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for consent to advertise for public submissions.
c) REFERS Amendment No. 18 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: TPS/0024
File Name: BAAmen24.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 16 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application to amend District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) to rezone a portion of Lot 1 (569) Flynn Drive, Carramar, from Local Scheme Reserve for Parks and Recreation to Special Residential No. 5.
Applicant |
Drescher & Associates |
Owner |
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
Location |
Portion of Lot 1 Flynn Drive, Carramar |
Site Area |
3,088 square metres |
MRS Zoning |
Rural |
Existing DPS 2 Zoning |
Local Reserve for Parks and Recreation |
Proposed DPS 2 Zoning |
Special Residential No. 5 |
Background
Lots 1 and 2 Flynn Drive, Carramar, were rezoned to Special Residential and Local Reserve for Parks and Recreation in 1996 to facilitate a subdivision of that land into Special Residential lots and to create an equine orientated recreation reserve on a rehabilitated quarry in the area.
Although subdivision approval for the land has been in place for several years now (and has recently been renewed), subdivision has not proceeded as the rehabilitation of the quarry area (involving fill by inert waste) is still continuing.
The site includes a number of old lime kilns which are included on Council’s Municipal Heritage Inventory. When the area was first designed for Special Residential use, these kilns were included in land to be reserved for Parks and Recreation. It was later found that an additional kiln existed to the north of the main group of kilns and the proposed Special Residential lot upon which this northern kiln was located was therefore also included in the Local Scheme Reserve for Parks and Recreation under DPS2.
Detail
Drescher & Associates has submitted an application seeking an amendment to DPS2 to rezone the land upon which this northern kiln was situated from Local Scheme Reserve for Parks and Recreation to Special Residential Zone No. 5.
The applicant’s reasons for this proposal are as follows:
“You will recall from earlier correspondence that this lot had previously been set aside as a Special Residential lot on the original development guide plan and subdivision application. However, it was subsequently incorporated as part of the Recreation Reserve when it was determined that a kiln existed on this lot.
You will recall that the fires that swept through the Neerabup National Park, Lake Neerabup and part of this special residential estate resulted in the demolition of this kiln. As the kiln now no longer exists, it is requested that this lot be reinstated as a Special Residential lot.
Access will still be available from this estate to Lake Neerabup to the north via the Reserve for fire management hence the community will not be disadvantaged by the removal of this additional area of reserve.
My client will be setting aside a considerable area of this land as a Recreation Reserve to accommodate the remaining kilns together with another area of land to be used for the establishment of an Equine and Botanical Gardens Reserve that is to be transferred to the City in fee simple. Even with the small deletion in area proposed by this amendment, a considerable part of the land is still to be set aside for open space purposes.”
The applicant also refers to a recent subdivision approval issued by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), which shows the subject site as a proposed Special Residential lot. The WAPC’s approval includes a footnote advising the applicant that an amendment will be required to DPS2 to rezone the 3088m² lot to Special Residential.
In respect to the applicant’s comment regarding the demolition of the kiln as a result of the bush fire in this area, the applicant advises that this demolition came about through falling trees and the fire fighters’ attempts to extinguish the fire.
The location of the 3088m² lot in relation to the current Development Guide Plan for this Special Residential zone is shown on Attachment 1. A more detailed plan showing the location of the subject lot in relation to the northern part of the Special Residential zone is shown on Attachment 2.
Consultation
Under the provisions of the Town Planning Regulations, consent to advertise scheme amendments from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is not required if the amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and other State planning policies and strategies. In this instance as this proposal is generally consistent with the MRS zoning, state policies and statutes, and indeed has already been acknowledged by the WAPC through the subdivision process, the WAPC’s consent to advertise is not considered necessary.
Comment
The subject land has been inspected by Council officers and it has been confirmed that the kiln no longer exists on this site. It is therefore considered reasonable that the land concerned revert to its originally intended use as a Special Residential lot.
The Special Provisions applying to this Special Residential zone include a provision that the number of special residential lots within this zone should not exceed 167. As the subdivision plan recently approved will result in 166 lots (including this 3088m² lot), this Special Provision does not need amending.
In respect to the Development Guide Plan for this zone, although DPS2 provides that subdivision ‘shall generally be in accordance’ with this plan and consequently technically does not have to be amended to accommodate this proposal, to avoid any possible future confusion on the matter, it would be desirable for the Development Guide Plan to be amended to reflect this proposal.
Statutory Compliance
The amendment will be processed in accordance with the Town Planning Regulations.
Strategic Implications
Development of this proposed Special Residential zone, including this proposed additional lot within this zone, will be consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan which refers to promotion of lifestyle choice.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. In pursuance of section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928 (as amended), PREPARES Amendment No. 24 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) rezone the 3088m² portion of Lot 1 Flynn Drive, Carramar, previously intended as open space to accommodate an old lime kiln as highlighted on Attachment 2 to this report, from Local Scheme Reserve for Parks and Recreation to Special Residential Zone No. 5;
b) amend the Development Guide Plan for Special Residential Zone No. 5 to change the 3088m² portion of land concerned from ‘public open space’ to a Special Residential lot.
2. REFERS Amendment No. 24 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act;
3. FORWARDS a copy of the Amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commission for information.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0012V01
File Name: BAProAmM.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by CH Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Jackie Holm Date 14 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Attachments: 2
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider adopting a proposed amendment to the Mindarie Keys Harbourside Agreed Structure Plan (ASP).
Applicant |
Chappell and Lambert |
Owner |
Mirvac Fini |
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Marina |
Background
In March 2000, Council adopted the Mindarie Keys Harbourside Village Structure Plan which covers the land adjacent to the Mindarie marina. This structure plan was subsequently adopted by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).
A copy of the ASP is shown on Attachment 1.
Detail
The substantive parts of the proposal are to amend the structure plan as follows:
1. Modify (generally reduce) the residential density codes in the Harbourside Village (District 2);
2. Introduce a split R30/60 coding within the 2C.2 precinct, where the higher code may be used for lot sizes of at least 1800 square metres;
3. Introduce minor modifications to the structure plan, including use permissibility’s to ensure consistency with District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2);
4. Introduce minor changes to the design provisions for development within the Harbourside Village (District 2);
5. Provide for the adoption of Detailed Area Plans (DAPs) which will provide a range of intended design requirements for each lot relating to matters such as access, easements and setbacks.
The statutory section of the modified structure plan is shown on Attachment 2.
Consultation
Clause 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2) provides that public notification of an amendment to an ASP may be waived where the amendment is considered to be of a minor nature which does not materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
The applicant has requested that Council consider the proposal as a minor variation and therefore waiver the requirement for notification.
Comment
The Harbourside Village of the structure plan area is predominantly undeveloped.
The proposal generally seeks to reduce existing residential density codes. The changes to the design provisions are considered acceptable and will provide for a high quality of built form and streetscape. The changes to the density codes will still encourage a diversity of housing types, including single residential dwellings, grouped housing and multiple dwellings. The revised provisions will not result in any substantial increase in building bulk and given the reduced densities, are likely to result in reduced traffic generation.
It is considered that the amendment is of a minor nature which will not materially alter the intent of the structure plan and therefore waiving advertising is recommended.
Statutory Compliance
The amendment to the structure plan will follow the statutory process outlined in Part 9 of DPS2.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this structure plan amendment is consistent with Goal 2 of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and the provision of quality services and infrastructure. One of the Strategies of the Planning and Development Directorate Plan that arises from this Goal, is to provide for a cohesive system of integrated land use planning and to update and review structure plans, policies and local laws.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.7 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 WAIVES the requirement for public advertising.
2. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 RESOLVES that the Amendment to the Mindarie Keys Harbourside Village Agreed Structure Plan, as submitted by Chappell and Lambert on behalf of Mirvac Fini is satisfactory and SUBMITS three copies to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification.
3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the amended structure plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Sub-Division Applications
File Ref: P34/0205
File Name: CAAppfor.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by CH Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a request to lodge an application with the WA Planning Commission to subdivide Lot 9 (30) Ashby Street, Wanneroo.
Applicant |
R.A. & R. Phillips, on behalf of the owners |
Owner |
D.B. & I. Head, R.A. & R. Phillips, E. & P. Waller (tenants in common) |
Location |
Lot 9 (30) Ashby Street, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
3.9255 ha |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Rural Resource |
MRS Zoning |
Rural |
Background
The location of the subject land is shown on Attachment 1, and a more detailed plan of the general area concerned is shown on Attachment 2.
The City approved of the construction of a second house on the lot concerned in 1990, subject to the owners entering into a legal agreement with the City (pursuant to Council policy), securing the owners’ agreement as follows:
“That until such time as the land is rezoned from its present rural zoning under the Town Planning Scheme presently applicable thereto to some other zoning whereby the land may be subdivided the owners will not without the prior written consent of the Council seek to subdivide the land or apply for approval to any subdivision thereof”.
Detail
The owners have now submitted an application to the City, seeking its consent to them applying to the WA Planning Commission for subdivision of their property.
The following sets out the reasons submitted by the owners in support of their application:
“There are two houses on the property. One is lived in by the Head family and Mrs Waller; the other by the Phillips family. The houses have been occupied since 1990 – 1991. Mr Waller no longer lives at this address, having separated from Mrs Waller.
In order to comply with the conditions of the caveat on this property, we request your permission to apply for subdivision. We request that this application be submitted to Council for determination.
We have been exploring our options for the use of this land. The attached letter from the Water and Rivers Commission indicates that the commercial water allocation for this area has been exhausted. There is, therefore, a reduced opportunity for us to sell the land for agricultural purposes, and a property of this size is arguably too small for modern market gardening. In addition, with two houses on the property, it is unlikely that we could sell the property for agricultural purposes without making a loss, and the property would not be viable for rural resources purposes without demolishing two modern houses.
We have little interest in farming the land ourselves. The land largely consists of relatively undegraded native bushland, with many species of plants and an abundance of native birds and reptiles. We would like to retain this habitat, as a small green belt, in an area subject to ongoing land clearing.
Our second reason for requesting permission to subdivide is compassionate. With Mr Waller no longer able to reside on the property, we would like to secure his accommodation in his retirement, by purchasing property, to be rented by Mr Waller. Currently it is not possible for us to use the existing title as equity in obtaining finance, because one of the title-holders living on the property (Mrs Waller) is a pensioner.
Our proposal is to subdivide the property into two, relatively equal portions. No further subdivision is envisaged, nor do we seek to change the zoning.
It is relevant to note that the housing density will not change as part of this proposal – there are currently two houses on the property, and there will remain two houses on the subdivided property, one on each portion.
Furthermore, many properties in the surrounding area seem to have been subdivided in a similar manner. The attached map shows a section of the new rural resources zone, being parts of Elliot Rd, Benmuni Rd., Jambanis St., Ashby St, Badgerup Rd., Carmignani Rd., Ross Rd., Hawkins Rd. and Damien Rd. By our count, 45 of the 121 properties highlighted on this map are smaller than 4ha in area. This would seem to be sufficient precedent to support our proposal”.
The Water and Rivers Commission advice referred to above advises as follows:
“The Water and Rivers Commission would like to advise that currently, the superficial aquifer within the Mariginiup sub-area of the Wanneroo Groundwater Area, within which your property is located, has reached its sustainable limit. The Commission will not normally issue new licences to take water once water is fully allocated. Consequently, any application for a water licence for the above property in the near future is likely to be refused.
Please be informed however, that water licences and entitlements can be transferred. Please refer to the enclosed pamphlet for more information”.
Consultation
Should consent be granted for the owners to apply to subdivide, then upon an application being made to the WA Planning Commission, the Commission will consult with all relevant agencies, however there is no provision under the Town Planning and Development Act for community consultation on subdivision proposals.
Comment
The following comments are made on the reasons submitted by the owners:
1. Although there is presently no further ‘free’ groundwater available for allocation, as noted in the advice from the Water and Rivers Commission, it is possible for water to be purchased or leased through water trading.
(Information recently provided by the Water and Rivers Commission indicates that Lot 9 currently has associated with it a well licence for an amount of 2,250 kl/annum, for the purpose of two household uses, and the irrigation of 0.3 ha of lawns).
2. The 4 ha minimum lot size which has applied to this general area under rural subdivision policies of the Council and the state planning agencies for about the past 25 years has been mainly based on the view that this is the minimum lot size required for most forms of intensive agriculture to be viable. Although many rural land owners now argue that 4 ha is too small for a viable intensive agricultural operation, such operations on such lots are still continuing and being established. Indeed, some types of ‘boutique’ vegetable growing evidently can be viably undertaken on lots smaller than this one.
3. The impact of the two houses on the re-sale potential of the lot is something which the owners should have appreciated and accepted at the time of construction of the second house, particularly given the existence of the aforementioned legal agreement which has been signed by the owners.
4. The compassionate reasons submitted, though obviously very important to the applicants, is generally not a relevant planning consideration.
5. While subdivision may not mean any physical change to the land at this point, it can eventually lead to applications for further subdivision or development for non rural purposes, given the smaller lot sizes and the consequential reduction in the number of options available for viable agricultural uses.
6. The plan referred to by the applicant showing precedents for subdivision of lots less than 4 ha in the surrounding Rural Resource zone, does in fact verify some 45 lots less than 4 ha in area (the plan submitted by the applicant has not been attached to this report because of its poor quality, however the information shown on the plan is shown on Attachment 3 to this report). In most if not all instances, these subdivisions have occurred through appeals, usually to the Minister for Planning. Appeal decisions, because they often include consideration of compassionate grounds, generally do not provide a valid basis for precedent.
7. The owners advise that they have no wish to farm the land, but rather retain its native bushland. The vegetation is of the ‘Karrakatta Complex-Central-South’ type which will be protected at an 8% level through Bush Forever, falling below the target 10% level set by Bush Forever. Notwithstanding the questionable validity of the other reasons submitted by the owners, the issue of the possible significance of this bushland and its implications for possible subdivision is considered to warrant careful consideration.
The subject land is included within an area which is zoned Rural Resource under DPS2, the main objective for this zone being promotion of agricultural uses. However, this is not to say that all land zoned Rural Resource is necessarily best used for agricultural uses. Indeed, various Bush Forever Sites where bushland protection is required are included within areas zoned Rural Resource.
Policy P10.5 of Council’s Interim Local Rural Strategy (LRS) states that:
“The Council may support applications for rural living zoning or subdivision within areas of regionally or locally significant bushland*:
i) where it is considered that such rezoning or subdivision provide a suitable means for achieving effective bushland protection for the land concerned.
ii) where the lots concerned comprise of singular portions of significant bushland, and land with no bushland significance, of a minimum of 1 hectare of each portion. In such cases subdivisions will be considered when Council concludes that the subdivision will lead to retention of bushland areas.
(* At present, areas of ‘locally significant bushland’ are still to be determined.)”
Support for this proposed subdivision could provide an opportunity to put in place a mechanism such as a conservation covenant to secure protection of this bushland. However, this would set a significant precedent for other bushland properties in Wanneroo and it may be best for this issue to be addressed on a more comprehensive basis through the East Wanneroo Rural Land Use and Water Management Review study which is now commencing.
Statutory Compliance
Should consent to this application be granted by Council, the owners would then need to formally apply to the WA Planning Commission for subdivision approval.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of the possibility of facilitating bushland protection on this property would be consistent with the environmental sustainability goal of this City’s Strategic Plan, and also the actions proposed for biodiversity protection under the Local Environmental Strategy.
Policy Implications
The subject land falls within an area where under Council’s rural subdivision policy, a minimum lot size of 4 ha should be retained. This proposal, if approved, would result in lot sizes of approximately 2 ha.
However, Council’s rural subdivision policy does include an ability to support subdivisions which involve lot sizes smaller than the stipulated minimum in ‘special cases’ ie. where the particular circumstances and merits of a case are considered to justify such a departure from the usual minimum lot size. Council could consider supporting this present proposal as a ‘special case’, and such support could also be accommodated under Policy P10.5 of the Interim LRS referred to previously in this report. However, it is recommended that such support would be premature at this time and that the issues raised may be better addressed through the East Wanneroo Rural Land Use and Water Management Review study.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT CONSENT to the owners of Lot 9 Ashby Street, Wanneroo applying for approval to subdivide that property.
2. REQUIRES that the issue raised by this proposal (namely the merits or otherwise of allowing subdivision of rural lots to lot sizes which are below the minimum lot size which is normally required under the rural subdivision policy, subject to mechanisms being agreed to by the subdivider to facilitate protection of significant bushland on the land) be considered through the East Wanneroo Rural Land Use and Water Management Strategy Review, and that the applicant be advised accordingly.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Late report to be tabled at the meeting. (Please select this link to access the report.)
Development Applications
File Ref: PA5/0092V01
File Name: EAProTou.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by hw Date 16 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by hw Date 16 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for a proposed Tourist Facility comprising a Miniature Model Village and landscaped gardens, Restaurant, Art/Craft Gallery and Caretakers Dwelling for Part Lot 3 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo.
Applicant |
Peter Cann Development Consulting |
Owner |
Goldrange Pty Ltd |
Location |
Part Lot 3 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
3.426 hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
General Rural |
MRS Zoning/Reservation |
A portion “Urban” and the remaining Reserved for “Parks and Recreation” |
Background
Although the site is currently vacant, two development approvals for the subject site have been granted in recent years. In August 1993, Council approved a Tourist park incorporating animal enclosures. In September 1997, Council approved a “Restaurant/Function Centre and Chalet Development for the subject site. Neither of the development approvals were acted upon.
Detail
The subject site is located at the eastern end of Drovers Place, on the south-west corner of Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive (refer Attachment 1). The majority of the site is zoned General Rural under the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 with a small portion (southern part) of the site reserved under the Metropolitan Region Scheme for Parks and Recreation purposes.
A mini golf course (Botanic Golf) abuts the western boundary of the subject site with a plant nursery abutting the eastern boundary of the subject site. Yellagonga Regional Reserve and Lake Joondalup are located to the south of the site. The only direct vehicle access to the site is currently via Drovers Place, which runs parallel to Joondalup Drive. A separate development application is currently being considered by the City for a proposed access road to link Wanneroo Road and Drovers Place. The access road is proposed to provide a direct access route from Wanneroo Road to the site.
As mentioned previously the proposed Tourist Facility comprises of a Miniature Model Village and landscaped gardens, Restaurant, Art/Craft Gallery and Caretakers Dwelling for Part Lot 3 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo. All proposed land uses are classified as ‘A’ uses under the provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 and in accordance with Clause 6.7 of the Scheme required to be advertised for public comment and determined by Council.
The Model Village extends over one hectare of land, and comprises a series of walkways meandering through landscaped gardens, waterways and replica towns. The village will comprise of international cities including London and Cape Town and a local context including the Perth and Fremantle Central Business Districts. According to the applicant strategically placed viewing points will enable tourists a range of perspectives into the model towns and views over the surrounding landscaping.
The water feature (lake) associated with the model village will have a maximum depth of 500mm, and will be constructed utilising a commercial grade pond liner so that all the water within the lake is totally self contained. Significant areas of the subject site will be developed as landscaped gardens. Organic gardening methods are proposed to be utilised due to the proximity of the site to Lake Joondalup.
The Art and Craft Gallery is intended to display and offer for sale locally made arts and crafts. The gallery has an approximate area of 100m² and is accessible directly from the Model Village.
The restaurant component of the development has been designed to cater for the tourist market expected to be attracted to the Model Village and also service the surrounding local market. The restaurant provides a total eating area of approximately 288m² and is expected to be open for lunch and dinner seven days a week.
The Caretaker’s Dwelling is located on the first floor of the restaurant.
Consultation
The application was referred to a number of relevant government agencies for comment. These agencies are the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI), Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA), Conservation and Land Management (CALM), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Water and Rivers Commission (WRC).
The application was also advertised in accordance with Clause 6.7 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2. Advertising was carried out by means of two on-site signs, an advertisement being placed in the Wanneroo Times Community Newspaper and abutting landowners and statutory authorities being informed by mail.
The submission period closed on 23 September 2002. During this time no letters of objection were received. However, three (3) letters of support for the Tourist Facility were received. The three letters of support identified the following benefits of the Tourist Facility:
· “The tourist facility will compliment and benefit the existing surrounding land uses and be a drawcard for tourists to the area.
· The tourist facility will create local employment opportunities.”
Comment
Metropolitan Region Scheme Reservation
The proposed development is to be located entirely on land zoned General Rural under the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2.
As a portion of the site is Regional Reserve – Parks and Recreation there are a number of environmental issues associated with the proposed development.
Notwithstanding, the Department of Planning and Infrastructure has indicated that it needs to determine the application under the Metropolitan Region Scheme as the property abuts a sensitive regional reserve.
Yellagonga Regional Park
The subject site abuts Yellagonga Regional Park and the southern portion of the site is also part of Bush Forever site 299. As the proposal has the potential to impact on the Yellagonga Regional Park the proposal was referred to CALM.
The proposal was referred to CALM for a period of 30 days. No submission was received by CALM and therefore it is assumed it has no objection to the proposal.
Lake Joondalup
Lake Joondalup is a Conservation Category wetland with the objectives to “preserve wetland attributes and functions through reservation in National Parks, crown reserves, State owned land and protection under Environmental Protection Policies”. The Waters and Rivers Commission (WRC) recommends a minimum buffer of 50 metres from open water (critical influence buffer). The applicant has provided a diagram showing the figurative layout of the site and notes the MRS reserve at the rear of the property. The diagram indicates that a buffer of 50 metres from the MRS reserve will be applied. This will be adequate for the 50 metre critical influence requirements. The buffer area should be rehabilitated with local native species and be fenced as recommended by the applicant’s environmental consultant.
It should be noted that a buffer of 200 metres also applies to nutrient intensive land uses. It is unclear as to how much of the site is intended to be developed as gardens, with the extent of this likely to have an impact in the form of stormwater drainage, nutrients, herbicides and pesticides. The applicant will be required to prepare a drainage (including carpark), nutrient and irrigation management plan (NIMP) to identify how these impacts will be controlled.
The Water and Rivers Commission has advised that it does not support the proposal in its current form. Of particular concern to the Commission is the location of the proposed workshop within the 200 metre wetland buffer and the potential of the workshop in leading to contamination of Lake Joondalup. However it has advised that if the proposal is modified to incorporate adequate wetland protection measures the Commission may reconsider the width of the wetland buffer. The following information will be required by the applicant to demonstrate adequate wetland protection measures:
· Types of materials and substances to be used in the workshop
· Plans for disposal of waste from the site.
· Plans for containment of waste on site, including contingencies to contain spills of hazardous material.
· Concentrations of contaminants that may enter the wetland from overland drainage or through contamination of groundwater.
Midge Management
High midge densities occur in the Lake Joondalup area as a response to wetland nutrient enrichment and poor water quality. The nuisance value to nearby residents associated with the extreme numbers of midge, result in pressure on Council to use pesticides to control the midges. Applications of pesticides ultimately cause further declines in water quality and may commit Council into ongoing spraying regimes. The proposed development could have the potential to contribute to this problem and should therefore develop a midge management plan to advise how it intends to minimise problems associated with midge. The City’s Health Services has advised that the requirement for a Midge Management Plan can be a condition of approval.
Fringing Wetland Vegetation
The existing vegetation on the subject lot should be retained and fenced from unauthorised access. It is unclear from the information presented by the applicant, whether clearing of fringing wetland vegetation will be required to implement this development.
Although the DEP has been invited to comment on the proposal, it has indicated that if planning approval were contemplated it is likely that the proposal will require a full environmental impact assessment under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act (1986). It is considered that this can be imposed as a condition of approval.
Traffic Impacts
The City’s Infrastructure Services has advised that it has no objection to the proposed Tourist Facility. An assessment of the Traffic Impact Study submitted by the applicant indicates that the proposed development will have no adverse impact on the surrounding road network.
The amount of traffic that the development is expected to generate is considered to be relatively low and its peak is expected to occur during the weekends and outside normal road network peaks.
The Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) Strategic Transport Section has advised that the proposed access road (subject of a separate development application) will have to be re-aligned to allow for the ultimate interchange design for the Wanneroo Road - Joondalup Drive intersection. The applicant has advised that it is prepared to make the necessary changes to comply with Department for Planning and Infrastructure requirements.
Design
The proposed development complies with all scheme requirements in terms of development standards. The proposed dwelling achieves all necessary setback distances to boundaries and satisfies all parking requirements under the Scheme.
Sewer
The Water Authority has advised that sewer is not available to the subject site and nor is it proposed within their five (5) year works program. The City’s Health Services have advised that the Drovers Road nursing home has undertaken the necessary infrastructure works to provide sewer to their development. As the nursing home is located in close proximity to the proposed Tourist Facility, it is considered that the sewer could be made available to the subject site.
Statutory Compliance
The proposed development complies with all statutory requirements of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2. Minor changes will be required to the car parking layout and onsite vehicle manoeuvring to comply with the City’s Engineering requirements.
Strategic Implications
The tourism opportunities that this development proposes are consistent with objective 3.5 of the Strategic Plan (develop the tourism industry).
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council in accordance with the provisions of
the City District Planning Scheme
No. 2:
1. APPROVES the application for a Proposed Tourist Facility at Part Lot 3 (1397) Wanneroo Road, subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicant complying with all Building and Health requirements within the City.
b) The development complying with setbacks and any other details and amendments notated on the approved plans.
c) A Nutrient and Irrigation Management Plan (NIMP) being submitted in accordance with the Water and Rivers Commission Guidelines to the satisfaction of the City.
d) The submission of a midge management plan and approval by the City prior to the commencement of any works. The management plan to incorporate, amongst other measures, a satisfactory means of ensuring that prospective residents are aware of the potential midge nuisance. The recommendations contained within the management plan being implemented prior to any portion of the development first being occupied.
e) The development to be connected to sewer.
f) A rehabilitation plan being submitted and approved indicating how local native species will be introduced within the 200 metre critical influence buffer.
g) Carparking bays are to be 5.5 metres long and a minimum of 2.5 metres wide. End bays are to be 2.8 metres wide and end bays in a blind aisle are to be 3.5 metres wide. Disabled parking bays shall be provided in accordance with the Building Code of Australia.
h) The parking bay/s, driveway/s and points of ingress and egress to be designed in accordance with the Australian Standard for Offstreet Carparking (AS2890) unless otherwise specified by this approval. Such areas are to be constructed, drained, marked and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City prior to the development first being occupied .
i) An onsite stormwater drainage system with the capacity to contain a 1:100 year storm of a 24 hour duration is to be provided prior to the development first being occupied and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City. The proposed stormwater drainage system is required to be shown on the Building Licence submission and be approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction.
j)The proposed access road linking the subject site with Wanneroo Road being approved to the satisfaction of Department of Planning and Infrastructure Strategic Transport Planning Section and the City.
2. REFERS the application to the WAPC for determination under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS).
3. REFERS the application to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for assessment under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986.
Footnote
1. The lodging of an application for a Building Licence under the provisions of the Building Regulations and approval from the City before commencing any works whatsoever.
2. The application being designed and constructed in compliance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1986.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
MRS Reserve
– Parks and Recreation Reserve
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P36/0056V01
File Name: EAUnaRet.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for retaining walls on Lot 562 (9) Compass Circle, Yanchep where works have commenced and objections have been received.
Applicant |
Robert Allen |
Owner |
Robert Allen |
Location |
Lot 562 Compass Circle, Yanchep |
Site Area |
809m2 |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential |
Background
A formal complaint was received on 10 March 2002 by the City in relation to unauthorised retaining walls at the abovementioned address which were creating overlooking issues. The City inspected the site on the 11 March 2002 and confirmed that the retaining walls located along the side and rear boundaries had been commenced and had no formal approval.
On 19 March 2002 the City issued to the owner of the property a Notice Pursuant to Section 401 of the Local Government Act (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960, which required the removal of the unauthorised retaining walls. The landowner subsequently, lodged an appeal against the Notice.
On the 23 April 2002 the Department of Local Government notified the City of the appeal and requested a response. The City’s response dated 1 May 2002 outlined that construction of the walls complied with the Building Code of Australia, contravened the City’s District Planning Scheme in that no planning approval had been sought, and significant overlooking problems had been created. The Department of Local Government advised the applicant on the 10 May 2002 that the City would be in a position to support the appeal subject to the following:
1. Submission of a practicing structural engineer’s report stating that the retaining walls are structurally sound and compliance with the structural requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
2. Obtaining a retrospective Town Planning approval from the City.
The applicant lodged an application on 26 July 2002 for retrospective planning approval.
Detail
The application proposes construction of three retaining walls to be located along the northern, southern and western boundaries.
The site slopes from a relative level of 10.0 metres at the front boundary to a relative level of 6.0 metres along the western boundary, as indicated on the plan dated and submitted on the 29 October 2002 (refer attachment 2).
The applicant proposes to terrace the property from the rear of the building to the rear boundary in three levels. The top terrace will be at a relative height of 10.0 metres, the second terrace at 9.25 metres and the final terrace at 7.75 metres (refer attachment 3).
Consultation
On the 20 August 2002, the application was advertised for 14 days to the surrounding landowners, as works were proposed on the boundary. Four (4) submissions were received from adjoining property owners during the advertising period. Two submission were from the same household. The concerns raised have been summarised below:
Comment |
Administration Comment |
Submission No.1
The wall will create an ugly looking fence 4.6 metres high.
It is a danger to our side.
It will devalue our property.
Hopes that the block is returned to its original slope or a reasonable terrace. |
Noted. The visual impact of the wall is acknowledged.
The walls have been certified by a structural engineer.
No evidence has been submitted to support this claim.
Noted. |
Submission No. 2
The works are unsound and pose danger when in our yard.
The wall be create an eyesore when the fence is added.
The effect of the completed work is already creating an eddying effect in any breeze. No doubt if allowed to remain and be topped by a fence this erosion effect will be exacerbated creating further problems to my property. |
The walls have been certified by a structural engineer.
Noted
Noted.
|
Submission No. 3
The foundations do not appear in any shape or form to resemble the plans viewed at Council. The foundations presently in the ground are minimal.
There is no accompanying proposal seeking permission to alter ground levels by some 2.0 metres or more.
No drainage component appears on the plan.
Concern over the origins of the imported sand and its stability as to whether compaction processes were conducted.
There has been no acknowledgment of the purpose for the earthmoving.
For several years there has been extensive ground alteration and in past year a wall construction. There has been no consultation with us whatsoever.
We now have the prospect of a 4.1 plus metre wall spoiling our view, creating an eyesore, unsafe from inadequate reinforcement, uncertain drainage effects and of questionable purpose.
The construction is a danger to our family, particularly small children, is effecting any resale of our property and is indubitably uninsurable.
On looking at the proposed plan and photographs I observe that, the construction details appear to be bogus, and the photos taken by your officer show levels of the property after months of land filling.
The construction takes no account of drainage and is dangerous.
|
The applicant has lodged a structural engineers report that certifies the walls as being structurally sound.
The application is for retaining and filling of the lot.
All drainage is required to be disposed of on-site.
Noted. The works will need to be engineer certified.
The applicant has advised that the purpose of the works is to level the property in order to make it safe for their children.
Noted.
Noted. The visual impact of the wall is acknowledged.
The walls have been certified by a structural engineer.
Noted.
Noted. |
Comment
The original plan submitted indicated that the finished ground levels were to be at a relative level of 10.0 metres, implying the top of wall height of the retaining walls would be required at a relative height of 10.0 metres, effectively making the retaining wall at the rear boundary 4.0 metres in height. These heights were considered inappropriate in light of the objections raised during the advertising period. The applicant was advised that amended plans would be required and should propose no more than 1.3 metres of retaining along the rear boundary.
Amended plans were received on the 15 October 2002 and indicate that the natural ground levels at the rear of the property range between relative levels of 5.95 metres and 6.55 metres taken from a datum of 10.0 metres (refer attachment 3). These levels are inconsistent with the levels submitted in 1999 and contained on the City’s records (refer attachment 4). A survey prepared by a licenced practicing land surveyor has not been submitted with the application to support the natural ground levels proposed by the owner.
The applicant approached the City’s Infrastructure Services and was able to obtain a contour plan which indicates the existing natural ground levels from the Australian Height Datum taken in 1991. These levels correspond to a relative level of 10.0 metres at the front boundary and 6.0 metres at the rear boundary (17.0 to 13.0 metres, respectively) (refer attachment 2).
The top of wall height proposed by the applicant is 9.25 metres at the second terrace level and 7.75 metres at the third terrace contained within the rear southwestern corner of the lot. This would imply that the retaining wall along the northern boundary would range up to a height of 3.25 metres, be between 1.75 metres and 3.25 metres in height along the western boundary and up to 1.75 metres in height along the southern boundary (refer attachment 5).
The wall heights as proposed by the applicant are considered to be excessive and would have an adverse impact on the amenity of the adjacent owners. Photographs of the works commenced on site have been included as Attachment 6.
The Residential Design Codes under the acceptable development standards requires all filling within one metre of a common boundary to be no more than 0.5 metre in height above the natural ground level and retaining walls to be setback from common boundaries to minimise the impact on adjoining properties. The application fails to meet the acceptable development standards.
The applicant was requested to submit written justification which has been summarised below:
“…we would like you to be aware of the original situation of the land even before we owned the property. The natural fall of the land rendered the backyard to be totally unusable and highly unsafe. As we have two small children we wanted to complete the existing retaining walls. The footings had already been started prior to us owning the property. We believe we were within our rights as the walls were not being constructed on the boundary.
We now have an approval from a structural engineer based on the details given and evidence of footings visible.
The retaining walls were already in existence prior to the rear extension. We had notification the septic tanks needed to be relocated and were given instructions as to where these needed to be placed. These tanks were placed as per the plan at a distance of 1.8 metres from the retaining wall. Should these walls be removed the septic tanks are in danger of collapsing.
…we are so much higher than all our surrounding neighbours that we can stand inside our kitchen, dining and lounge room and see into all our adjoining neighbours properties as well as those we do not adjoin. By having this retaining wall and erecting a fence that would suit our neighbours it is our belief this would create a far more secluded and unobstrusive environment for all concerned.
As our children are still small and at an age were they prefer to play outside we were finishing this wall for them to have some room to play and be in a safe environment. The natural fall of the land as it was, was very dangerous as we were always afraid of it landsliding. This has happened on occasions whereby it has pushed over the super six fence which we had to replace and fix.
The amended plan is justified as follows:
The northern side of the block the height of the wall will be 2.7 metres which is behind our western neighbours high gable shed and this wall can not have an adverse impact on their amenity as it is lower than the roof of the structure”
Administration acknowledges the significant slope of the lot and considers the request for retaining not to be unreasonable, however, it is of the view that any additional retaining and fill in the areas previously approved by the City on 19 January 2000, would have an adverse impact on the amenity of the adjacent lots and that any retaining wall and fill in the rear portion of the lot should not exceed a maximum height of 1.3 metres.
A retaining wall of 1.3 metres in height with a standard 1.8m fence would provide a total height of 3.1 metres on the boundary and be no higher than a parapet wall to a single storey dwelling. The proposed heights of the retaining walls located on the boundary fail to meet the performance criteria of the Residential Design Codes in that the development does not retain the visual impression of the natural level of the site as seen from the adjoining properties.
The City would recommend that the application be supported subject to the top and second terrace retaining walls and levels remaining unchanged at a relative level of 10.0m and 8.55 metres respectively, as approved on 19 January 2000 and the third or lower terrace level not exceeding a maximum retaining wall height of 1.3 metres above the natural ground level.
Statutory Compliance
Non compliance with Clause 3.6.1 A1.1 and P1 of the Residential Design Codes, which states that filling behind a street setback line and within one metre of a common boundary should not exceed more than 0.5 metres above natural ground level at the boundary. It is Administrations view that the development fails to meet the performance criteria of the Residential Design Codes to warrant support at the levels proposed.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVE the Retaining Walls on Lot 562 (9) Compass Circle, Yanchep in accordance with the plans attached to and forming part of this report and subject to the following conditions:-
1. The upper terrace finish paved level and retaining walls remaining at a relative level of 10.0 metres as depicted on the plans lodged and approved on 19 January 2000.
2. The second terrace finish paved level and retaining walls not exceeding a maximum relative level of 9.25 metres and not extending further westwards of the retaining wall previously approved at a relative level of 8.55 metres as depicted on the plans lodged and approved on 19 January 2000
3. The lower terrace area and retaining walls not exceeding a maximum height of 1.5 metres measured from the original natural ground levels as indicated on Attachment 2.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE
1 OF 3
Photo 1: Southwest Corner looking across the northern boundary to the north.
ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE
2 OF 3
Photo 2: Northwest Corner looking across northern boundary towards the south
ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE
3 OF 3
Photo 3: East looking southwest across the lot from a finished level of approximately 8.55metres.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0008
File Name: FCSubApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 14 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 08 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 11
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Determination of subdivision applications processed in the period between 1 and 30 September 2002 under delegated authority.
Detail
The West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.
Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Division this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.
Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.
SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).
SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.
SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.
SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.
SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.
SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.
The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority between 1 and 30 September 2002.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority between 1 to 30 September 2002 as listed:
No |
WAPC No/Recd. |
Zoning / LDU Category |
Advice |
WAPC Advised |
|
1. |
119362
14/06/2002 |
Lot 9013 (2352N) Marmion Ave, Butler Homeswest Vacant |
Urban Development
SCU1 |
Supported Note: originally deferred 17/07/02 |
26/09/2002 |
2. |
119408
25/06/2002 |
Lot 201 (5855) Mitchell Freeway, Two Rocks Mirvac-Fini |
Rural Community 01 SCU1 |
Supported Note: originally deferred 6/03/02 |
13/09/2002 |
3. |
119499
15/08/2002 |
Pt Lot 100 (140) St Andrews Drive, Yanchep
Sun City Ltd |
Local Auth Reserve – Public Use, Parks & Recreation / Residential / Private Clubs & Recreation SCU5
|
Supported |
11/09/2002 |
4. |
119500
15/08/2002 |
Pt Lot 100 (140) St Andrews Drive, Yanchep
Sun City Ltd |
Local Auth Reserve – Public Use, Parks & Recreation / Residential / Private Clubs & Recreation SCU5
|
Supported |
12/09/2002 |
5. |
119649
08/08/2002 |
Pt Lot 1 (100) East Road, Pearsall Five Star Asset Pty Ltd |
Urban Development
SCU1 |
Supported |
16/09/2002 |
6. |
119707
05/08/2002 |
Lot 84 (5) Toulon Circle, Mindarie Mindarie Keys Joint Venture |
Marina
SCU1 |
Supported |
12/09/2002 |
7. |
119754
20/08/2002 |
Lot 105 (15) Kingsway, Madeley Tonic Holding Pty Ltd & Synergy WA Pty Ltd |
Urban Development
SCU1 |
Supported |
03/09/2002 |
8. |
119830
15/08/2002 |
Pt Lot 305 (150) Hartman Drive, Wangara LandCorp |
Reservation – Other Regional Road / Service Industrial / General Industrial SCU1 |
Supported |
09/09/2002 |
9. |
119950
26/08/2002 |
Lot 8001 (220B) Santa Barbara Parade, Quinns Rocks Silverton Ltd |
Residential
SCU1 |
Supported |
19/09/2002 |
10. |
119957
03/09/2002 |
Lot 9007 (35) Driver Road, Darch Taylor Woodrow Australia Pty Ltd |
Urban Development
SCU1 |
Supported |
19/09/2002 |
11. |
853-02
13/08/2002 |
Lot 212 (41) Lilac Hill Vista, Madeley J & E Schroeder |
Residential
SCU5 |
Supported |
10/09/2002 |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0009V01
File Name: FADevApp.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by shb Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by shb Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by hw Date 16 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by hw Date 16 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Development Applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 September 2002 and 30 September 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.
Background
Nil
Detail
The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes (R Codes.)
The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures with between 80 to 130 development applications being received per month in addition to an average of 400 to 500 building license applications.
Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to Council Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.
Council Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.
Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 September 2002 and 30 September 2002, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 14 August 2001 (item W340-08/01 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning and Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1 September 2002 and 30 September 2002.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/0223 15/02/2002 CONG K NGUYEN & NGOC B NGUYEN 119 $250,000.00 Refused
Prop address 119 ZIATAS ROAD PINJAR WA 6065
Land Lot 1 D 7794 Vol 1041 Fol 129
Description TWO STOREY DWELLING
Applicants CK NGUYEN, NB NGUYEN
File Number 68758
DA02/0561 26/04/2002 ARAULLO NOMINEES PTY LTD, BITAS PTY LTD, 3 $450,000.00 Approved
Prop address 83 FURNISS ROAD DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 36 D 97580 Vol 2169 Fol 121
Description CHILD CARE CENTRE
Applicants K SMITH
File Number 73533
DA02/0713 17/05/2002 MASTERKEYPROPERTIES PTY LTD 86 $0.00 Approved
Prop address COMMERCIAL SITE 21 EAST ROAD HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 179 D 95026
Description CHANGE OF USE - OFFICE TO SHOP & SHOP TO BAKERY
Applicants BSD CONSULTANTS PTY LTD
File Number 15802
DA02/0966 26/06/2002 ROSEMARY E BROWN & PETER AA HOLLANDS 66 $107,985.00 Approved
Prop address 21 LUMLEY CLOSE LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 1500 DP 27680 Vol 2218 Fol 001
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES
File Number
DA02/1005 04/07/2002 PATRICK MARTINS & SONJA C MARTINS 31 $221,597.00 Approved
Prop address 60 TURQUOISE LOOP BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot 75 P 24258 Vol 2196 Fol 77
Description SINGLE HOUSE (BUILDING ENVELOP MODIFICATION)
Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P04/0033V01
DA02/1033 26/06/2002 SUNVALLEY INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 5 $100,846.00 Approved
Prop address 6 LUCCA ENTRANCE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 225 DP 31636
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1053 12/07/2002 GABRIELLE MCDONNELL 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 68 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 703 DP 32841 Vol 2523 Fol 305
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1119 25/07/2002 RUSSELL GOODALL & MARY GOODALL 6 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 70 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 704 DP 32841
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1157 31/07/2002 STUART C POLICH 23 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 79 MARCHWOOD BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 524 DP 32842 Vol 2523 Fol 321
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1160 01/08/2002 JULIE L BINNS & RAYMOND J BINNS 17 $6,200.00 Approved
Prop address 20 MAREE PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 218 P 17238 Vol 1858 Fol 823
Description COLOURBOND GABLE SHED
Applicants OUTDOORWORLD
File Number P12/0024V01
DA02/1162 01/08/2002 CARINE NOMINEES PTY LTD 10 $100,000.00 Approved
Prop address 2359 MARMION AVENUE JINDALEE WA 6036
Land Lot 12 P 12466 Vol 1508 Fol 910
Description USE NOT LISTED - BULK EARTHWORKS
Applicants WOOD & GRIEVE ENGINEERS
File Number P15/0001VO1
DA02/1163 01/08/2002 ROSINA TUFILLI 26 $82,872.00 Approved
Prop address 41 PRINCETON CIRCLE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064
Land Lot 433 D 99244 Vol 2182 Fol 281
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1184 05/08/2002 JENNIFER R WIGHTMAN & ROSS A WIGHTMAN 8 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 53 LORIAN ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 248 P 18491 Vol 1941 Fol 266
Description SINGLE HOUSE - 12M ADDITION TO EXISTING SHED FOR STORAGE OF VINTAGE CAR
Applicants JR WIGHTMAN, RA WIGHTMAN
File Number P12/0001V01
DA02/1186 06/08/2002 ANDREW JS HUNGERFORD 22 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 51 EMERALD DRIVE CARABOODA WA 6033
Land Lot 6 DP 24939
Description Building Envelope Modification
Applicants AJS HUNGERFORD
File Number P06/0024V01
DA02/1206 09/08/2002 NATALIE VAN DIJK & LANE G HEENAN 16 $250,000.00 Approved
Prop address 62 THE FAIRWAYS GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 59 DP 25804 Vol 2503 Fol 34
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants GLENWAY HOMES
File Number P12/0031V01
DA02/1209 07/08/2002 CINDY-LEE THA & JONATHAN THA 31 $166,006.36 Approved
Prop address 31 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 192 DP 27702 Vol 2509 Fol 579
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants J CORP
File Number P09/0048V01
DA02/1211 08/08/2002 ADAM M TATE & AMANDA K TATE 3 $152,129.00 Approved
Prop address 16 LANGFORD BOULEVARD MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 229 DP 28269 Vol 2513 Fol 055
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P18/0034VO1
DA02/1212 09/08/2002 JEAN I BETTS & ANNE C BULMER 27 $98,946.00 Approved
Prop address 63 SEAGROVE BOULEVARD MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot 1987 DP 31294 Vol 2521 Fol 726
Description SINGLE HOUSE AND ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION
Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P21/0057VO1
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1215 12/08/2002 BRIAN R HICKS & JENNIFER M HICKS 7 $175,000.00 Approved
Prop address 32 BANTRY BEND MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 1148 P 24247
Description TWO STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants BR HICKS
File Number P22/0135V01
DA02/1224 14/08/2002 BEVERLEY J MOLONEY 1 $85,000.00 Approved
Prop address 54 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 6 D 71578 Vol 1761 Fol 694
Description FACTORY UNIT - EXTENSION TO EXISTING UNITS
Applicants CALIBRE CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD
File Number P33/0041V01
DA02/1226 13/08/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 17 $550,000.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED 2352N MARMION AVENUE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 9013 DP 31441
Description USE NOT LISTED - BULK EARTHWORKS & LAND CLEARING
Applicants COSSILL & WEBLEY PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1227 14/08/2002 SUSAN P TILBURY 5 $216,902.00 Approved
Prop address 37 TALARA CIRCUIT MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 1272 P 24248 Vol 2197 Fol 820
Description TWO STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants J CORP
File Number P22/0149V01
DA02/1237 16/08/2002 ROSS G BETTINI & TONI J BETTINI 22 $320,000.00 Approved
Prop address 12 IVORY WAY MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 1552 DP 31030 Vol 2517 Fol 031
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants Kevin Burns Homes
File Number
DA02/1241 16/08/2002 CYNTHIA BENTLEY & NOEL R BENTLEY 20 $90,476.00 Approved
Prop address 46 ALLANBI CIRCLE CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot 1616 DP 30968 Vol 2517 Fol 577
Description SINGLE STOREY HOUSE
Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P07/0083V01
DA02/1255 20/08/2002 ERIC J VAN DELFT & LORRAINE V VAN DELFT 24 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 4 JINKINS WAY MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 187 DP 28269 Vol 2513 Fol 047
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1257 20/08/2002 HOMESWEST RENTALS 18 $1,400.00 Approved
Prop address 40A TENDRING WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Part Lot 1250
Description GROUPED DWELLING - RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS
Applicants A NAUGHTON
File Number P11/0098V01
DA02/1263 21/08/2002 ALISON DIXON & RODNEY DIXON 17 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address 70 MANCHESTER DRIVE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 290 P 23077 Vol 2154 Fol 033
Description USE NOT LISTED - RETAINING WALL
Applicants PROFESSIONAL LIMESTONE SERVICE
File Number P13/0042V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1264 19/08/2002 RYSZARD SZMYRKO & TERESA SZMYRKO 15 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 52 KINGSWAY MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 152 DP 28993 Vol 2511 Fol 874
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants WESTCOURT
File Number
DA02/1268 21/08/2002 TREVOR R REES & SUSAN V REES 23 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 21 WELSTEAD WAY HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 440 DP 32011 Vol 2522 Fol 631
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1277 23/08/2002 MARY MINEHAM 10 $135,350.00 Approved
Prop address 12 BAYFIELD CRESCENT MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 492 P 24066 Vol 2196 Fol 113
Description TWO STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants J CORP
File Number P22/0170V01
DA02/1279 19/08/2002 CROWN - VESTED CITY OF WANNEROO 19 $0.00 Approved
Prop address ALEXANDER HEIGHTS PARK-RES 36585 20 GREENPARK ROAD ALEXANDER HEIGHTS
Land SWAN LOC 10980
Description SPORTS GROUND - STOREROOM ADDITION
Applicants CROWN - VESTED CITY OF WANNEROO
File Number PR01/0002
DA02/1280 19/08/2002 CROWN - VESTED CITY OF WANNEROO 19 $0.00 Approved
Prop address PALOMA PARK-RES 41225 68 JEFFERSON DRIVE MARANGAROO WA 6064
Land SWAN LOC 11288
Description SPORTS GROUND - STOREROOM ADDITION
Applicants CROWN - VESTED CITY OF WANNEROO
File Number
DA02/1281 23/08/2002 PATANAL PTY LTD 6 $130,949.00 Approved
Prop address 12 GLENVISTA WAY MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 280 DP 31940
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1282 23/08/2002 JUDITH A SILVERLOCK 22 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 63 GOLFVIEW PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 211 DP 24895 Vol 2212 Fol 756
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - SHED AND TUNNEL HOUSE ADDITIONS
Applicants D SILVERLOCK
File Number P12/0038V01
DA02/1283 23/08/2002 LYNETTE B THOMPSON 9 $2,853.00 Approved
Prop address 17 DALVIK AVENUE MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot 2 Vol 2520 Fol 444 S/P 41773
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants ERECT-A-PAT
File Number P21/0059VO1
DA02/1284 21/08/2002 MARK C CARPENE 11 $10,300.00 Approved
Prop address 182 CARABOODA ROAD CARABOODA WA 6033
Land Lot 27 P 8913 Vol 1753 Fol 470
Description Rural Sheds
Applicants TOTAL WEST CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number P06/0026VO1
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1303 28/08/2002 YONG CHENG & HONG LI 3 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 5 SANDRINGHAM DRIVE DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 88 DP 29961 Vol 2515 Fol 361
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1304 30/08/2002 MARION J PASSANISI & MICHAEL PASSANISI 9 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address 18 CHICQUITA PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 116 P 13145 Vol 1558 Fol 653
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants MJ PASSANISI, M PASSANISI
File Number P34/0229V01
DA02/1305 28/08/2002 CAROL A BRETT 4 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 5 BRYANSTON PASS MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 253 DP 31940 Vol 2521 Fol 767
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1306 30/08/2002 MARIANNE E GASKE & RAYMOND T GASKE 8 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 21 CYCAS COURT MARANGAROO WA 6064
Land Lot 708 P 19385 Vol 1988 Fol 259
Description SINGLE HOUSE - GARAGE EXTENSION
Applicants ME GASKE, RT GASKE
File Number P19/0115V01
DA02/1307 30/08/2002 PHYLLIS E HALL & FREEHOLD ENTERPRISES PTY 10 $3,000.00 Approved
Prop address YANCHEP CHILD CARE 61 LAGOON DRIVE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 1 D 89664
Description CHILD CARE CENTRE - ALTERATIONS TO CARPARK
Applicants PE HALL, FREEHOLD ENTERPRISES PTY LTD
File Number PA3/0001VO1
DA02/1308 30/08/2002 CANDICE R CORDEIRO 3 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 12 WELSTEAD WAY HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 445 DP 32011 Vol 2522 Fol 636
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1325 03/09/2002 CLEMENTE MANCINO & DIANE H MANCINO 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 9 DUNSFOLD STREET BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 946 DP 30599 Vol 2514 Fol 287
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants VENTURA HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1326 03/09/2002 JOHN RAFFERTY & ANNE E RAFFERTY 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 2 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 231 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 459
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants CONTENT LIVING
File Number
DA02/1328 03/09/2002 MINH TRAN 15 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 1/12 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 1 Vol 1521 Fol 321 S/P 6480
Description CHANGE OF USE - FACTORY UNIT TO LIGHT INDUSTRY CHICKEN PROCESSING
Applicants M TRAN
File Number PA5/0028V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1330 04/09/2002 DONNA L PARKER & GEORGE W PARKER 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 31 ABBOTSWOOD DRIVE LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 1326 P 24022 Vol 2190 Fol 308
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants CONTENT LIVING
File Number
DA02/1331 04/09/2002 RAYMOND D BARTELL & ANNE-MARIE P BARTELL 15 $56,000.00 Approved
Prop address 12 BEXLEY WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 2 Vol 2512 Fol 935 S/P 40476
Description GROUPED DWELLING - ADDITION OF SECOND DWELLING
Applicants RD BARTELL, AP BARTELL
File Number P11/0134V01
DA02/1343 06/09/2002 DARREN P CASTELLI 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 3 DRIVER ROAD DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 123 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 910
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants CONTENT LIVING
File Number
DA02/1345 06/09/2002 THI N NGUYEN & VAN L HUYNH 15 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 12 WOODWARD CIRCLE MARANGAROO WA 6064
Land Lot 82 P 15068 Vol 1695 Fol 547
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - CLOTHING MAKING
Applicants TN NGUYEN, VL HUYNH
File Number P19/018VO1
DA02/1346 06/09/2002 REEFKING PTY LTD 4 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 10 PENSACOLA TERRACE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 381 P 23837 Vol 2183 Fol 303
Description CHANGE OF USE - SHOWROOM TO AUTOMOBILE SERVICE AREA
Applicants PETER CANN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
File Number PA5/0006V01
DA02/1347 06/09/2002 HAZEL LAKE HOLDINGS PTY LTD 15 $29,018.00 Approved
Prop address YANCHEP HOLIDAY VILLAGE 56 ST ANDREWS DRIVE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 49 P 11496 Vol 1430 Fol 512 S/P 42129
Description RETIREMENT VILLAGE - CARPORT ADDITIONS
Applicants ESE PATIOS & HOME IMPROVEMENTS
File Number PA5/0080V01
DA02/1357 09/09/2002 AARON F SUSAC & RAYMOND M SUSAC 14 $12,000.00 Approved
Prop address 108 WINDSOR ROAD WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 24 P 6677
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants AF SUSAC, RM SUSAC
File Number P33/0053V01
DA02/1360 10/09/2002 FIVE STAR ASSET PTY LTD 7 $900.00 Approved
Prop address 128L EAST ROAD PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Part Lot 48 D 61221 Vol 1656 Fol 896
Description USE NOT LISTED - LAND SALES SIGNAGE
Applicants PROPERTY YIELDS WA
File Number P25/0036VO1
DA02/1361 10/09/2002 BARBARA J HOLT & EDWARD P HOLT 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 9 BRASTED WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 709 DP 32841 Vol 2523 Fol 311
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1362 10/09/2002 BRIGITTE A LAWRENCE 7 $9,500.00 Approved
Prop address 139 CAPORN STREET MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Part Lot 2 D 33001 Vol 2058 Fol 600
Description SINGLE HOUSE - ADDITIONS
Applicants BA LAWRENCE
File Number P20/0026V01
DA02/1363 10/09/2002 NAN A HEWITT 3 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 30 PALM CORNER QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 856 DP 31410 Vol 2517 Fol 481
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number
DA02/1386 20/09/2002 PINERIDGE ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 0 $160,000.00 Approved
Prop address MEDICAL CENTRE SITE 10 JENOLAN WAY MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot 1575 D 87204
Description HARDWARE STORE
Applicants J MILLER
File Number P21/0084v01
DA02/1394 19/09/2002 HEATHER D BENNETTS & NOEL S BENNETTS 1 $49,000.00 Refused
Prop address 300 ZIATAS ROAD PINJAR WA 6065
Land Lot 102 D 87246 Vol 2024 Fol 089
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - 30 ACRES STRAWBERRY FARM
Applicants J BODYCOAT
File Number
DA02/1395 19/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 5 TETBURY ROAD BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 997 DP 32842
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number
DA02/1396 19/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 39 BRADMAN DRIVE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 911 DP 32842
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number
DA02/1397 19/09/2002 AHL HOLDINGS LIMITED 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 32 EDGAR CRESCENT HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 472 DP 32011
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants VENTURA HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1406 20/09/2002 GINO LENZO & DOMINIC V LENZO 2 $6,000.00 Approved
Prop address 56 RANCH ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 5 D 72995 Vol 1787 Fol 775
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants G LENZO, DV LENZO
File Number P20/0035V01
DA02/1408 20/09/2002 AHL HOLDINGS LIMITED 2 $100,051.00 Approved
Prop address 17 WELSTEAD WAY HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 442 DP 32011
Description DA Reduced Garage Setback
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1409 23/09/2002 HELEN J DRURY 2 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 6 WORCESTER LOOP BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 403 DP 31441
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1410 23/09/2002 ANTONINO CHISARI & GIUSEPINA CHISARI 4 $1,000.00 Approved
Prop address 8 VILLANOVA STREET WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 20 D 42097 Vol 1383 Fol 442
Description USE NOT LISTED - COMMERCIAL BUILDING SIGNAGE
Applicants A CHISARI, G CHISARI
File Number PA5/0065VO1
DA02/1411 23/09/2002 EMMA BERRY & CRAIG A LAUGHTON 4 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 8 LUCCA ENTRANCE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 226 DP 31636 Vol 2523 Fol 452
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants RENOWNED HOMES
File Number
DA02/1413 23/09/2002 BYRON J WARREN & PAMELA A WARREN 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 32 OAKDENE DRIVE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 216 DP 31940 Vol 2521 Fol 748
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1430 25/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 2 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 10 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 985 DP 31249
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/0311 08/03/2002 CARLOTTA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 142 $3,000.00 Approved
Prop address 348 GIBBS ROAD NOWERGUP WA 6032
Land Lot 12 D 39500 Vol 386 Fol 184A
Description USE NOT LISTED - SOIL CONDITIONING
Applicants A ANDERSON
File Number 19170
DA02/0326 13/03/2002 Mrs HELEN E FARNHILL & STEPHEN S FARNHILL 10 $192,071.00 Approved
Prop address 214 CARABOODA ROAD CARABOODA WA 6033
Land Lot 25 P 8913 Vol 1989 Fol 636
Description SINGLE STOREY HOUSE
Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number 14020
DA02/0377 19/03/2002 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF PERTH 89 $700,000.00 Approved
Prop address ST ANTHONYS PRIMARY SCHOOL 7 SERVITE TERRACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Part Lot 512 D 99780
Description EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT - STAGE 3 - LIBRARY, ADMIN, MULTI PURPOSE,
Applicants RONAL HAWKINS ARCHITECT PTY LTD
File Number 63910
DA02/0977 28/06/2002 NIGEL RIDLEY & SARAH L RIDLEY 13 $148,500.00 Approved
Prop address 4 INGHAM WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 982 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 479
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/0981 28/06/2002 MICHELLE L WILKINS & BRETT S WILKINS 48 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 8 WEXFORD MEANDER LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 1435 D 99571 Vol 2191 Fol 523
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/0997 05/07/2002 PETER M JENZEN 58 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 87 WINDSOR ROAD WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 27 P 6677 Vol 1285 Fol 934
Description TRANSPORT DEPOT
Applicants PM JENZEN
File Number A5/0051
DA02/1038 11/07/2002 LENCE LAZAREV & VASIL LAZAREV 43 $104,373.00 Approved
Prop address 19 DANDENONG WAY ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064
Land Lot 71 P 19820 Vol 2012 Fol 133
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P01/0066V01
DA02/1043 12/07/2002 CITYZONE HOLDINGS PTY LTD 36 $2,000.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED 273 KINGSWAY DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 30 P 6439 Vol 1979 Fol 191
Description ESTATE ENTRY STATEMENT
Applicants CITYZONE HOLDINGS PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1056 15/07/2002 ARNOLD VS DAMMERS & JULIE A DAMMERS 19 $45,000.00 Approved
Prop address 48 WELLS STREET MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Part Lot 2 D 15941 Vol 2016 Fol 948
Description EQUESTRIAN ACTIVITY
Applicants JA DAMMERS, AVS DAMMERS
File Number
DA02/1073 17/07/2002 CAVERSHAM PROPERTY PTY LTD 43 $383,043.00 Cancelled
Prop address 999 CONNOLLY DRIVE MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot 906 P 16687 Vol 1827 Fol 880
Description USE NOT LISTED - EARTHWORKS - SEAGROVE ESTATE STAGE 10A & 10B
Applicants DENNIS PRICE & MILLER
File Number P21/0039VO1
DA02/1075 16/07/2002 GEOFFREY M WESTLAKE & SALLY M WESTLAKE 19 $88,547.27 Approved
Prop address 30 TURQUOISE LOOP BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot 70 P 24258 Vol 2196 Fol 72
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants CONTENT LIVING
File Number PO4/0032VO1
DA02/1109 24/07/2002 DONALD M BELL & JEAN K BELL 29 $0.00 Refused
Prop address 17 CONISTON PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 750 DP 29301 Vol 2510 Fol 963
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants TANGENT NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1126 25/07/2002 ERIK C SORENSEN 42 $20,000.00 Approved
Prop address 45 HONEY STREET MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 91 DP 24779
Description SINGLE HOUSE - OUTBUILDING ADDITION
Applicants P SORENSEN
File Number P20/0019V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1142 29/07/2002 JODIE M CVITAN 9 $20,000.00 Approved
Prop address 42 KARIMBA STREET WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 63 P 10622 Vol 1345 Fol 414
Description SINGLE HOUSE - GARAGE ADDITION
Applicants JM CVITAN
File Number p34/0170v01
DA02/1145 30/07/2002 JOHN D COCHRANE & JULIE E COCHRANE 6 $151,229.00 Approved
Prop address 65 MONAGHAN CIRCLE DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 206 DP 29513 Vol 2513 Fol 919
Description TOW STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants PERCEPTIONS THE HOME BUILDERS
File Number P09/0003V01
DA02/1168 02/08/2002 ALLSPICE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 18 $369,084.00 Approved
Prop address 15 OCEAN KEYS BOULEVARD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 387 P 23837 Vol 2183 Fol 309
Description TWO SHOWROOM UNITS AND STORAGE
Applicants AUSTPEAK CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number PA5/0096V01
DA02/1171 02/08/2002 SHANE K HALL 28 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 12 KENSINGTON WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 78 P 24311
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1179 05/08/2002 DARRELL B CAREY & JOANNE CAREY 37 $1,000.00 Approved
Prop address 35 MINDARIE DRIVE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 612 P 8290 Vol 433 Fol 67A
Description USE NOT LISTED - RETAINING WALL
Applicants DB CAREY, J CAREY
File Number P27/0147V01
DA02/1194 08/08/2002 GABRIELLE E COUSINS & EDWARD J WHITE-DUNN 34 $500.00 Approved
Prop address 192 FRANKLIN ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Lot 2 D 26189 Vol 1287 Fol 148
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - PACKING & MACHINERY SHED
Applicants GE COUSINS, EJ WHITE-DUNN
File Number P14/0005V01
DA02/1197 08/08/2002 INDUSTRIAL LANDS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 $360,000.00 Approved
Prop address 150 MATHER DRIVE NEERABUP WA 6031
Land Lot 10053 DP 186030 Vol 1659 Fol 100
Description USE NOT LISTED – EARTHWORKS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTOURING OF SITE
Applicants J HACKETT
File Number PA5/0095V01
DA02/1199 08/08/2002 ELENA L GENOVESE, DAVIDE GENOVESE, 18 $100,000.00 Approved
Prop address 16 WOODLANDS GROVE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 113 P 16428 Vol 1917 Fol 126
Description ONE ADDITIONAL GROUPED DWELLING
Applicants S GENOVESE, AM GENOVESE, D GENOVESE & Others
File Number P13/0065V01
DA02/1201 08/08/2002 SIDERNO MEWS PTY LTD 17 $1,000,000.00 Approved
Prop address 10 SIDERNO RISE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 167 D 97051 Vol 2173 Fol 396
Description THIRTEEN (13) SINGLE STOREY GROUPED DWELLINGS
Applicants SIDERNO MEWS PTY LTD
File Number P13/0066V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1203 08/08/2002 SANDRA STEWART 18 $1,000.00 Approved
Prop address 25 WARRUGA WAY WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 539 P 10444 Vol 1346 Fol 645
Description GROUPED DWELLING - PATIO AND PERGOLA ADDITIONS
Applicants S STEWART
File Number P32/0055V01
DA02/1229 14/08/2002 NATALIE A CUNNINGHAM & DAVID HOTCHIN 7 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 2 STONEGATE STREET BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 990 DP 31249 Vol 2516 Fol 487
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants SCOTT PARK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1232 15/08/2002 EDWARD JUHAS 27 $134,200.00 Approved
Prop address 3 REES DRIVE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 637 P 8342 Vol 12 Fol 95A
Description SINGLE HOUSE - 2 STOREY
Applicants E JUHAS
File Number P27/0178V01
DA02/1235 15/08/2002 AUREL BICAN & LIDIA BICAN 21 $145,000.00 Approved
Prop address 36 DALECROSS AVENUE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 223 DP 31940 Vol 2521 Fol 751
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants S RAVI
File Number
DA02/1245 19/08/2002 BRYAN F WINCH & DEBORAH J WINCH 18 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 15 PINKERTON AVENUE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 453 DP 32011 Vol 2522 Fol 644
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1250 14/08/2002 VINCE SEDIC & MARIA SEDIC 25 $277,404.00 Approved
Prop address 35 GATESHEAD LOOP MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 1073 P 23585 Vol 2171 Fol 072
Description TWO STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES
File Number P22/0154VO1
DA02/1251 19/08/2002 JEFF S KAZIM 9 $615,134.00 Approved
Prop address 2 BATON ROUGE DRIVE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 1064 P 23585 Vol 2172 Fol 063
Description TWO STOREY SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants ARTIQUE HOMES
File Number P22/0167V01
DA02/1270 19/08/2002 SANDRA M SIMUNOV & STEPHEN I SIMUNOV 13 $8,000.00 Approved
Prop address 18 WEATHERLEY DRIVE TWO ROCKS WA 6037
Land Lot 118 P 10775 Vol 1379 Fol 564
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants SI SIMUNOV
DA02/1273 22/08/2002 DOREEN J MORRELL & RAYMOND D MORRELL 23 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 56 AMBERLEY WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 237 DP 32919
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants RD MORRELL
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1276 23/08/2002 CROWN LAND-CITY OF WANNEROO MANAGEMENT 15 $17,000.00 Approved
Prop address GUMBLOSSOM CRAFT/CHANGERMS 17 TAPPING WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land PT RES 28376
Description CIVIC BUILDING - STOREROOM ADDITION - GLUMBOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE
Applicants G PRUS
File Number P/0011V01
DA02/1292 27/08/2002 SATALA PTY LTD 6 $1,000.00 Approved
Prop address 5/46 ATTWELL STREET LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Part Lot 12
Description GENERAL INDUSTRIAL - ADDITION TO STORE DANGEROUS GOODS
Applicants PROFILL PTY LTD
File Number P17/0106V01
DA02/1296 20/08/2002 HELEN J BLACKWOOD & KEVIN D BLACKWOOD 14 $106,461.00 Approved
Prop address 1 BROCKWELL PARKWAY LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 1383 P 24321 Vol 2204 Fol 606
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMESTYLE PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1309 30/08/2002 ICHI PTY LTD 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 21 EVANDALE ROAD DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 80 DP 29961
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants ASHMY PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1310 30/08/2002 CAROLYN J CLARK & JEFFREY R CLARK 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 83 PEMBURY WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 742 DP 30598 Vol 2514 Fol 438
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP
File Number
DA02/1311 30/08/2002 JASON AUTY & KELLIE A MAZZURRA 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 38 PALM CORNER QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 852 DP 31410 Vol 2517 Fol 477
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number
DA02/1314 02/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 5 $94,961.00 Approved
Prop address 17 FERRY WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 816 DP 31410
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP
File Number
DA02/1321 02/09/2002 MARGIT BALOGH & MATYAS BALOGH 7 $67,000.00 Approved
Prop address 20 HARFORD WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 687 P 10407 Vol 1789 Fol 089
Description SINGLE HOUSE - OUTBUILDING ADDITION
Applicants M BALOGH, M BALOGH
File Number P11/0120V01
DA02/1324 03/09/2002 GERRICK M HUXTABLE & VIVIENNE T HUXTABLE 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 19 BRANTWOOD APPROACH HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 572 DP 29125 Vol 2513 Fol 487
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants PETER STANNARD HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1333 04/09/2002 KAYE J RIDGWELL & FRANCIS R RIDGWELL 15 $109,090.00 Approved
Prop address 6 CYCLAMEN COURT WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 26 D 73874 Vol 1814 Fol 504
Description ADDITIONS TO EXISTING SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants KJ RIDGWELL, FR RIDGWELL
File Number P34/0230V01
DA02/1335 05/09/2002 ROXINE PATERSON 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 64 AMOS ROAD WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 92 P 19906 Vol 2006 Fol 705
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants INSTYLE RESIDENCE
File Number
DA02/1337 05/09/2002 MARIA G NEWBOUND & PETER J NEWBOUND 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 66 KIRKSTALL DRIVE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 522 DP 28089 Vol 2216 Fol 864
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES
File Number
DA02/1339 05/09/2002 DAVID BRADLEY & TRACEY D BRADLEY 14 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 24 EDGAR CRESCENT HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 468 DP 32011 Vol 2522 Fol 659
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES
File Number
DA02/1340 05/09/2002 KELVIN HUDSON & NICOLA HUDSON 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 5 FERRY WAY QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 821 DP 31410 Vol 2517 Fol 469
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1349 06/09/2002 SATTERLEY WANNEROO PTY LTD 10 $195,454.00 Approved
Prop address 5 MONET DRIVE ASHBY WA 6065
Land Lot 212 DP 31488
Description SINGLE HOUSE & USE NOT LISTED - TEMPORARY SALES OFFICE AND CARPARKING
Applicants J CORP
File Number P03/0009v01
DA02/1351 09/09/2002 BERNARD E RUDD & MARGARET RUDD 4 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 8 UPHAM BRACE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 543 DP 27675 Vol 2506 Fol 686
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1352 09/09/2002 CROWN LAND-CITY OF WANNEROO MANAGEMENT 4 $45,000.00 Approved
Prop address WORKS DEPOT-RES 27366 1204 WANNEROO ROAD ASHBY WA 6065
Land SWAN LOC 12302
Description CIVIC BUILDING - EMERGENCY VEHICLE SHELTER
Applicants J SOBON
File Number P10010V01
DA02/1354 09/09/2002 FIVE STAR ASSET PTY LTD 8 $900.00 Approved
Prop address 100 EAST ROAD PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Part Lot 1 D 16505 Vol 1149 Fol 483
Description USE NOT LISTED - LAND SALES SIGNAGE
Applicants PROPERTY YIELDS WA
File Number P25/0031V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1365 10/09/2002 COLLEEN L BLACKMORE 5 $84,215.00 Approved
Prop address 49 BRADMAN DRIVE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 686 DP 32842 Vol 2523 Fol 341
Description DA Reduced Garage Setback
Applicants COMMODORE HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1368 10/09/2002 JACQUELINE R MOSCARDINI 2 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 2 GLENORCHY BRACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 72 DP 31208 Vol 2519 Fol 492
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants AT MOSCARDINI, JR MOSCARDINI
File Number
DA02/1369 10/09/2002 PETER GW WILLETT 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 5 TIDWORTH ELBOW BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 861 DP 32842 Vol 2523 Fol 358
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP
File Number
DA02/1371 11/09/2002 JOMAPET PTY LTD 4 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 65 YANCHEP BEACH ROAD YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 6 DP 27575 Vol 2504 Fol 278
Description USE NOT LISTED - CLEARING & BULK EARTHWORKS
Applicants WOOD & GRIEVE ENGINEERS
File Number P36/0067
DA02/1374 12/09/2002 TRACY BEARD & MARTIN L KLONOWSKI 4 $2,900.00 Approved
Prop address 41 BUSHLAND RETREAT CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot 31 P 12964 Vol 1545 Fol 538
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants T BEARD, ML KLONOWSKI
File Number P07/0106v01
DA02/1375 10/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 3 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 47 BRADMAN DRIVE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 687 DP 32842
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number
DA02/1376 13/09/2002 ANGELA ESTRANO & EGIDIO ESTRANO 10 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 19 LUMLEY CLOSE LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 1501 DP 27680 Vol 2218 Fol 002
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants COLLIER HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1378 16/09/2002 STUART BALJEU 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 44 BURNETT DRIVE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 14 P 22848 Vol 2145 Fol 875
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1379 16/09/2002 PETA J RUTHERFORD & SIMON W RUTHERFORD 8 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 14 LUCCA ENTRANCE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 229 DP 31636 Vol 2523 Fol 455
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DANMAR HOMES
File Number
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued_date BETWEEN 01/09/2002 00:00:00 AND 30/09/2002
Note: Est Cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA02/1398 19/09/2002 HOMESWEST RENTALS 3 $3,100.00 Approved
Prop address 22A CALVERT WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Part Lot 363
Description GROUPED DWELLING - CARPORT ADDITION
Applicants AP NAUGHTIN
File Number P11/0146V01
DA02/1399 19/09/2002 HOMESWEST RENTALS 3 $3,000.00 Approved
Prop address 62A SALCOTT ROAD GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Part Lot 1003
Description GROUPED DWELLING - CARPORT ADDITION
Applicants AP NAUGHTIN
File Number P11/0147V01
DA02/1404 20/09/2002 GLEN P HANNAN & LYN D HANNAN 5 $3,500.00 Approved
Prop address 25 PENNYGUM PLACE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 15 D 96850
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO ADDITION TO EXISTING GARAGE
Applicants GP HANNAN, LD HANNAN
File Number P20/0034V01
DA02/1419 18/09/2002 HOMESWEST VACANT 6 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 7 HORSLEY GREEN BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 449 DP 32984
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1421 25/09/2002 MOON T CHAN & CHING C LIM 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 7 ARDMORE TERRACE DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 160 DP 27702 Vol 2509 Fol 564
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants IMPRESSIONS
File Number
DA02/1422 25/09/2002 PAULINE MCCABE & PETER T MCCABE 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 11 BRASTED WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 710 DP 32841 Vol 2523 Fol 312
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP PTY LTD
File Number
DA02/1425 25/09/2002 DARRYL JENKINS & REGINA A JENKINS 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 1 KARRIVALE COURT PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 225 P 23905 Vol 2182 Fol 927
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES
File Number
DA02/1427 25/09/2002 JOY R HEARLE & TIMOTHY C HEARLE 2 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 7 WILLESPIE DRIVE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 213 P 23905 Vol 2182 Fol 915
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants WESTCOURT
File Numbr
DA02/1428 26/09/2002 BRADLEY S FITZGERALD & REBECCA J HIGGINSON 0 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 18 LILAC HILL VISTA MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 185 DP 28991 Vol 2511 Fol 673
Description Single Dwelling
Applicants J CORP
File Number
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S02272T
File Name: AATenmwr.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Assessment and recommendation of Tender 02272 – The Supply and Delivery Of Two Trailed Gang Mowers and Trade-In Or Outright Purchase Of Two Seven Gang Trailed Mowers.
Background
The City’s trailed gang mowers, plant numbers 98516 and 98540 were purchased in July 1997 and June 1998 respectively and are used by the Parks Maintenance sub-unit to mow parks and reserves within the City. The City’s Plant Replacement Programme recognises the optimum replacement time for gang mowers is five years. On this basis provision was made in the City’s 2002/2003 Plant Replacement Programme to replace these mowers.
Detail
Tender 02272 was advertised on 14 September 2002 and closed on 2 October 2002.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Manager Building and Fleet Services, Acting Workshop Supervisor, Parks Maintenance Supervisor and the Fleet Officer, has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following assessment criteria as detailed in the tender document.
· Whole of life cost inclusive of price offered for the vehicles and trade in prices
· Operational assessment; and
· Mechanical assessment.
The following three tenders were received for the supply and delivery of two trailed gang mower:
· E & MJ Rosher offering a Hayter TM739
· McIntosh & Son offering a Ransome TG4650
· CJD Equipment offering a John Deere 365
A further tender for the outright purchase of the City’s existing mowers was also received from Smith Broughton & Sons.
As the City’s specification required that the mowers should have a cutting width of 4.7 metres, the John Deere 365 offered by CJD Equipment was considered to be non-conforming as it has a cutting width of 3.9 metres and was not included in the assessment of tenders.
The following table details the prices offered by each conforming tender.
Tenderer |
Machine Offered |
Purchase Price |
Trade Price |
Net Changeover |
E & M J Rosher |
Hayter TM739 |
$122,100 |
$9,000 |
$113,100 |
McIntosh & Son |
Ransome TG4650 |
$124,300 |
$14,000 |
$110,300 |
Smith Broughton & Sons |
Outright purchase of Trades |
|
$5,047 |
|
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender for the supply and delivery of two trailed gang mowers against the established criteria and reported as follows:-
1. Whole of life costs inclusive of price for the vehicles offered and trade-in prices.
The Ransome TG4650 offered by McIntosh & Son is the same model as the City’s current machine, plant number 98540 and whole of life cost was derived from the actual cost associated with this machine. The Hayter TM739 offered by E & M J Rosher is an upgraded version of the City’s current machine, plant number 98516. Again actual cost of the current machine was used in this assessment with an adjustment to account for the improved features of the newer model. This criterion represents 65% of the weighting applied and the following table details the score of each conforming tender.
Tender |
Score |
McIntosh & Son – Ransome TG4650 |
65.00 |
E & M J Rosher – Hayter TM739 |
56.86 |
2. Operational assessment.
From an operational point of view both machines perform satisfactorily and are considered equal.
3. Mechanical assessment.
The mechanical assessment considered items grouped under chassis components, hydraulics, cutting unit and product support. This criterion represents 10% of the weighting applied and resulted in a score of 6.75 for the Hayter TM 739 and 6.25 for the Ransome TG4650.
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender against the established criteria. The overall rankings of the tenders based on a weighted score is:
Rank |
Tender |
Weighted Score |
1 |
McIntosh & Son – Ransome TG4650 |
96.25 |
2 |
E & M J Rosher – Hayter TM739 |
88.61 |
Comment
Based on the overall ranking of tenders it is recommended that the tender from McIntosh & Son for the supply and delivery of two Ransome TG4650 trailed gang mowers be accepted on the basis of trading the City’s existing mowers, plant numbers 98516 and 98540 for a net change over price of $110,300.
Accepting the tender from McIntosh & Son will result in an over budget expenditure of $12,300. This has resulted from a higher than anticipated purchase price. The over budget expenditure can be funded from the Plant Replacement Reserve due to savings made on purchases to date and the anticipated sale of surplus plant.
The Fleet Steering Management Committee has reviewed this report and supports the recommendations.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost associated with accepting the recommended tender is compared to budget in the following table. The over budget expenditure can be funded from the Plant Replacement Reserve.
Tender |
Budget |
||||||||
Supplier/ Vehicle |
Trade Plant |
Council Price |
Trade Price |
Change Over |
Gross Price |
Trade Price |
Change Over |
Budget Variance |
Delivery |
McIntosh & Son – Ransome TG4650 |
98516 98540
|
$62,150 $62,150 |
$5,000 $9,000 |
$57,150 $53,150 |
$55,000 $55,000 |
$6,000 $6,000 |
$49,000 $49,000 |
-$8,150 -$4,150 |
14 weeks |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS Tender No 02272 from McIntosh & Son for the supply and delivery of two Ransome TG4650 trailed gang mowers and the trade of two existing mowers, plant numbers 98516 and 98540 for the net change over price of $110,300.
2. APPROVES the budget shortfall of $12,300 to be funded from the Plant Replacement Reserve.
File Ref: C02273V01
File Name: DATenNo0.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Assessment and recommendation for Tender No 02273 for the Supply and Delivery of Front Loader Refuse Bins for a Period of Two years.
Background
The City operates a Commercial Refuse Collection Service in an open competition format for businesses in the region. The service is competitively priced and helps to keep rubbish collection fees at a competitive level for all businesses in the area. The service covers all of its costs, contributes to corporate overheads and generates an operating surplus. Businesses within the City of Wanneroo receive a 5% discount on the scheduled fees.
The metal bins used for the service have a life of about seven years and a number need to be replaced each year. New bins are also required to service additional customers or to cater for the changing needs of customers.
The service provides a range of bins to suit the needs of different customers.
Detail
Tenders closed on Tuesday 8 October 2002 and the following three companies made submissions:
· Nufab
· Apollo
· Wastemaster
Details of the submissions are shown in Attachment 1 to this report.
The manufacturers all produce different bin configurations which are functional in their particular niches. The tender prices submitted are considered to be competitive and value for money.
Comment
The service needs to be able to have access to a range of bins to suit customer needs and it is proposed to accept the tenders from all three companies for their individual products.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender compliance and assessment process and endorses the recommendations.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The Commercial Refuse Collection Service needs to expend approximately $150,000 on the purchase of new bins each year to replace worn out units and service new customers. Funding has been approved in the Commercial Refuse Collection Service budget for the purchase of new bins.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender Number 02273 from Nufab Industries Pty Ltd, Apollo Fabrications and Wastemaster for their respective types of Front Loader Bins as detailed in Attachment 1.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Tender 02273 - Supply and Delivery of Front Loader Refuse Bins |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Year 1 - 1 December 2002 to 30 November 2003 |
Year 2 - 1 December 2003 to 30 November 2004 |
|||||||||||
Supplier |
Item |
1.5 m3 |
3.0m3 |
4.5m3 |
1.5 m3 |
3.0m3 |
4.5m3 |
|||||||
|
lid system |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
|
Nufab |
|
$820 |
$940 |
$1,114 |
$1,238 |
$1,340 |
$1,460 |
$943 |
$1,081 |
$1,281 |
$1,423 |
$1,541 |
$1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo |
steel lid |
$630 |
$959 |
$726 |
$1,061 |
$944 |
$1,270 |
$634 |
$1,007 |
$763 |
$1,114 |
$992 |
$1,334 |
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
galvanise |
$202 |
$202 |
$289 |
$289 |
$337 |
|
$202 |
$202 |
$289 |
$289 |
$337 |
|
|
|
polyethelyne lid |
$188 |
|
$107 |
|
$107 |
|
$188 |
|
$107 |
|
$107 |
|
|
|
steel easylid |
$306 |
|
$306 |
|
$306 |
|
$306 |
|
$306 |
|
$306 |
|
|
|
wheels |
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
|
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
$80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wastemaster |
steel lids |
$670 |
|
$860 |
|
|
|
$670 |
|
$860 |
|
|
|
|
|
plastic lid |
$790 |
|
$1,010 |
|
|
|
$790 |
|
$1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
low line steel lid |
|
|
$920 |
|
$1,272 |
|
|
|
$920 |
|
$1,272 |
|
|
|
low line plastic lid |
|
|
$1,070 |
|
$1,425 |
|
|
|
$1,070 |
|
$1,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roll top |
|
$965 |
|
$1,272 |
|
$1,560 |
|
$965 |
|
$1,272 |
|
$1,560 |
|
|
wheels |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
$146 |
|
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C02274V01
File Name: AATenNo0.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Assessment and recommendation for Tender No 02274 for the Provision of Green Waste Shredding Services at Motivation Drive, Wangara for a period of two years.
Background
The City operates the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility which accepts green waste from residents of Wanneroo and Joondalup and the greens collected from the Bulk Rubbish Collection from the two council areas. The greens are shredded and matured for sale to the public. The Parks Operations Unit also stores greens at Wangara and uses the same contractor to shred them for use on City projects.
Until recently, the City had its own shredding unit, but it was a low volume unit that was originally designed for street use and was only processing a portion of the greens. The remainder was processed via the previous contract for shredding services.
The shredded material is sold to part recover the cost of processing.
Detail
The tender is for the shredding of greens on site. The shredded material is put in a windrow and the volume measured, with payment made on the volume of material processed.
Tenders closed on Tuesday 8 October 2002 and the following three submissions were received:
|
Price per cubic metre |
|
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Grass Growers |
$7.00 |
$7.00 |
Amazon Soils and Landscaping Supplies |
$7.70 |
$7.70 |
Soiland |
$8.90 |
$8.90 |
Comment
The tender was assessed by the City’s Manager Waste Services in accordance with the following evaluation criteria, along with reference checking:
· Price
· Tenderer’s resources
· Previous experience
· Safety management
All three companies are experienced in the industry and received similar scores for resources, experience and safety management. The tender evaluation is therefore based on price and the lowest tenderer, Shayler Pty Ltd, t/a Grass Growers, is recommended.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender compliance and assessment process and endorses the recommendations.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The actual value of works will depend upon the volume of greens processed by the facility. The estimate is $150,000 per annum of shredding work and funding has been included in the Operational budget for the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender Number 02274 from Shayler Pty Ltd t/as Grass Growers for ‘Provision of Green Waste Shredding Services at Motivation Drive, Wangara for a period of two years at the tendered rate of $7.00 per cubic metre.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PA13/002V01
File Name: AATEN022.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 31 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Assessment and recommendation of Tender No 02276 for the Construction of Additions and Alterations to the Hainsworth Leisure Centre at 31 Hainsworth Avenue Girrawheen.
Background
At its meeting on 6 November 2001 Council approved the establishment of the Hainsworth Leisure Centre Redevelopment Community Reference Group with terms of reference to conclude when Council calls for tenders on the facility. It was also noted that a sum of $25,000 from the 2001/2002 Hainsworth Leisure Centre Re-development budget was to be utilised to progress the concept development of the Hainsworth facility to the point of submission to gain development approval (Report No CD05-11/01 refers).
At the meeting of the Reference Group on 29 August 2002, the architects for the project, Bollig Design Group, gave a detailed presentation on the proposed building modifications and colour selections. The City’s Landscape Designer also outlined the proposed treatments for the external areas, courtyard and car park. Subject to a review of colours for the servery feature wall and the bench top finish, general consensus was reached on the proposed building plans. It was also agreed that the removal and reinstatement of the existing angled roof facias and the replacement of the existing toilet fixtures and finishes would be included in the tender documentation as optional items for consideration should sufficient funding be available.
Detail
Tenders Received
Public tenders for the proposed works closed at the City’s Offices at 3.00pm on Monday, 21 October 2002 with the receipt of the following submissions:
Works as tendered: Complete Works
Brodun Construction Pty Ltd $1,349,165
Badge Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd $1,449,000
Dalcon Construction Pty Ltd $1,470,383
Lakis Constructions Pty Ltd $1,504,500
Messina Building Co. Pty Ltd $1,520,728
Sizer Builders $1,567,885
Brodun Construction Pty Ltd formally advised on 22 October 2002 that due to an omission in its pricing schedule it would withdraw from the tender. In view of this, their submission was not considered.
The Tender Assessment Team comprising the City’s Manager Infrastructure Services, Manager Leisure & Library Services and Coordinator Infrastructure Projects assessed the tenders in accordance with the following evaluation criteria, along with risk assessment and reference checking:
· Price for the Works offered.
· Tenderer’s resources.
· Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out work similar to the Works.
· Safety management.
The above weighted criteria indicates that Badge Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd be awarded the contract.
Tender key points to note were:
· Six tenders were received.
· As Brodun Construction Pty Ltd withdrew its tender, the lowest and conforming tender was submitted by Badge Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd.
Key Characteristics of the lowest tenderer, Badge Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd.
· Registered Builder acting under Reg. No.11193 held by the firm.
· Has not contracted work for the City but constructed the St Anthony Church Complex opposite the City’s Administration Building.
· The firm is currently undertaking, in Perth, two projects which will be completed in 2 months of a similar nature.
· The firm’s tender breakdown information is consistent with the prices presented in other submissions.
· A reference check with architectural firm referees confirms Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd as competent and capable prime contractor.
The Manager Contracts has reviewed the tender compliance and assessment process and endorses the recommendations of this report.
Comment
The tender submitted by Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd has been assessed and recommended for acceptance.
Works Programme
The following milestone dates are listed for the completion of this project:
Council Approval |
Tuesday 5 November 2002 |
Award Contract |
Friday 15 November 2002 |
Contractor on site-commencement |
Monday 18 November 2002 |
Practical completion (154 day contract period) |
Friday 25 April 2003 |
No allowance made for Christmas break |
15 days |
Practical Completion & Facility Commissioning |
Friday 9 May 2002 |
Statutory Compliance
Approval Services received no response when it advertised this project for public comment. Infrastructure Services was advised on the 10 July 2002 that approval was granted under the provisions of the City of Wanneroo Town Planning Scheme No 2 and the Metropolitan Region Scheme. The Approval to Commence Development is to be actioned in compliance with the City of Wanneroo’s standard conditions.
Tender documentation was submitted to Approval Services for its processing and issue of a Building Licence to the successful tenderer.
Strategic Implications
The construction of the alterations and additions to the Hainsworth Leisure Centre congruent to the City’s Strategic Plan goal of “Healthy Communities” and supporting objective "To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure" and specifically relates to “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The following table identifies all costs associated with the project.
Description |
Cost to Complete Works |
Funding |
Project Funding - Account No 1011 |
|
$1,393,180 |
Project Funding – Account No 2511 |
|
$10,000 |
Project Funding – Account No 3523 |
|
$7,000 |
Architectural Documentation – Bollig Design Group |
$43,900 |
|
Building Capital Works Project Management Fees (Internal) |
$36,000 |
|
Tender Advertisement & Administration Costs |
$3,500 |
|
Conforming Tender Sum – Badge Construction |
$1,449,000 |
|
Total Project Cost |
$1,532,400 |
$1,410,180 |
Short fall in Project funding |
|
$122,220 |
It is noted that the Project Accounts Nos 2511 and 3523 are allocated to the provision of playground equipment for the Hainsworth Kindergarten and Pre-Primary respectively.
A potential saving of $73,900 is identified by deleting from the works, the optional items comprising the replacement of existing toilet fixtures and finishes ($27,300) and the removal and reinstatement of the existing angled roof facias ($46,600).
However, City Administration supports the retention of the replacement of the existing toilet fixtures and finishes in the contract due to the general condition of these fixtures and the reduction in final standard of the redeveloped facility should this item be deleted. Whereas the roof facia works are considered to be of an aesthetic nature only and given the cost overrun it is recommended that they be deleted from the works. It is noted that an item has been included in the contract to paint the facias to match the new roofing colour. As a result of the deletion of the roof facia works, the shortfall in funding for the project is reduced to $75,620.
To fund this shortfall within the project budget the following amendments to provisional sums in the tender are recommended:
· Playground Equipment – provisional sum of $25,000 reduced to $17,000 to reflect the playground equipment project accounts giving a saving of $8,000.
· External Seating – provisional sum of $25,000 deleted at the expense of a reduced service on site. There are a number of low masonry walls on the site that can be used for seating.
· Soft Landscaping Works – provisional sum of $65,000 reduced by the outstanding balance of $42,620 to give a revised provisional sum of $22,380. This aspect of the project is not critical at this stage as the soft landscaping will be undertaken towards the end of the building works. Council will need to consider a reallocation of funds when the final design is complete and accurate costings determined.
Given the above deductions, the various tender item adjustments totally $122,220 reduces the tendered sum submitted by Badge Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd to $1,326,780. It is noted that City Administration will amend the scope of works relating to the reduction of the provisional sum for soft landscaping in this tender.
On this basis, City Administration recommends that the tender for the construction of additions and alterations to the Hainsworth Leisure Centre (Tender No. 02276) be awarded to Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd for the reduced tendered sum of $1,326,780.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS Tender Number 02270 from Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd for the Construction of Additions and Alterations to Hainsworth Leisure Centre at 31 Hainsworth Avenue, Girrawheen for the revised lump sum price of $1,326,780.
2. NOTES that the following deductions have been agreed with Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd:
· Removal and reinstatement of the existing angled roof facias totalling $46,600 (Optional Item).
· Reduced scope relating to the provision of playground equipment totalling $8,000 (Provisional Sum).
· External seating totalling $25,000 (Provisional Sum).
· Reduced scope relating to the provision of soft landscaping works totalling $42,620 (Provisional Sum).
3. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council on the funding requirements for the soft landscaping component of the project when the final design and costings are complete.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Report to be tabled at meeting.
(Please select this link to access the report.)
File Ref: PA1/003V01
File Name: BAAmos Road and Joel Way Wanneroo Parking Restrictions .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Tiiu Stojanovic
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachment: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the installation of the proposed parking restrictions on Amos Road and Joel Way, Wanneroo.
Background
Council considered a petition regarding the provision of parking embayments in front of the Wanneroo Community Nursing Home in Amos Road at its meeting on 13 August 2002, (Report No TS03–08/02 refers). One of the recommendations of the report was that Council “Notes that a further report will be presented on proposed parking restrictions in Amos Road and Joel Way, Wanneroo”
The report found that spillover parking from the Wanneroo Community Nursing Home in Amos Road exacerbated the sight distance requirements on Amos Road and at the intersection of Amos Road and Joel Way. This is due primarily to the curvilinear alignment of Amos Road. Residents’ amenity and the erosion and the destruction of reticulated verges are also affected by the indiscriminate parking that is occurring. Consequently, it was suggested that the requirement for parking restrictions be assessed and City Administration seek the concurrence of the affected residents.
Detail
The Traffic Code 2000 requires motorist to park a minimum of 10 metres from the prolongation of the kerb line at any intersection. Signage with “No Stopping” would reiterate this requirement and enhance safety for motorists egressing Joel Way. The proposed prohibitions are shown on Drawing No T1878-1-1 at Attachment 1, and identify the section of Amos Road which requires parking restrictions to enhance forward visibility for passing motorists and still preserve the amenity for the residents.
Spill over parking in front of the Wanneroo Community Nursing Home will still occur on the verge on the eastern side of Amos Road unless the proprietors of the Home wish to construct parking embayments at their cost and with City approval to the proposed works.
Consultation
Consultation has taken place with those residents of Amos Road and Joel Way affected by the parking restrictions. Letters seeking comment on the proposed parking restrictions were delivered by hand to the residents and there have been no objections raised.
The sign adjacent to the crossover of No 1 Joel Way was relocated following discussions with the owner of this property.
A copy of the restrictions was also forwarded to the Wanneroo Community Nursing Home for their comment. At a site meeting on 21 October 2002, agreement in principle to the proposed parking prohibitions was given by the CEO and Financial Controller for the Wanneroo Community Nursing Home
Comment
The installation of “ No Stopping Road or Verge” signs on Amos Road and Joel Way as shown on Drawing No T1878-1-1 will preserve residents amenity and enhance sight distance for motorists.
Statutory Compliance
Strategic Implications
This proposal to install parking restriction in Amos Road and Joel Way, Wanneroo is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge” signs on the eastern side of Amos Road and at the intersection of Joel Way and Amos Road, Wanneroo as shown on Drawing Number T1878-1-1 at Attachment 1.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R26/0001VO1, R26/0002VO1
File Name: BAOldYan.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by jan Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the changes to the speed limit on Old Yanchep Road – Pinjar Road, Pinjar as requested by Main Roads WA (MRWA).
Background
The City recently received advice from MRWA that it had undertaken a review of the speed limit on Old Yanchep Road – Pinjar Road, Pinjar. Safety factors such as curves in the road alignment were also reviewed.
Detail
In summary of investigations undertaken, it is advised that consideration needs to be given to the following proposals:
· The existing sign indicating “90/End 90” speed zone change, located 320m north of Spence Road to be relocated to 600m north of Wattle Avenue (East). Refer Attachment 1.
· The existing default speed limit of 110km/h, from 600m north of Wattle Avenue (East) to Wanneroo Road, Yanchep to remain unchanged.
· The installation of additional curve warning signs with advisory speed limit tags, at various locations north of Cutler Road as follows:
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 460m south of Hopkins Road
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 190m north of Hopkins Road
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 2.01km north of Cutler Road
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 2.33km north of Cutler Road
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 3.67km north of Cutler Road
- 90km/h Curve warning sign – 3.93km north of Cutler Road
- 80km/h Curve warning sign – 4.04km north of Cutler Road
- 80km/h Curve warning sign – 4.32km north of Cutler Road
- 80km/h Curve warning sign – 5.34km north of Cutler Road
- 80km/h Curve warning sign – 5.70km north of Cutler Road
- 70km/h Curve warning sign – 5.82km north of Cutler Road
- 70km/h Curve warning sign – 6.22km north of Cutler Road
· The installation of narrow road warning sign - 6.37km north of Cutler Road
· The installation of winding road warning sign (westbound) - 6.42km north of Cutler Road
· The installation of winding road warning sign (eastbound) – 40m south of Wanneroo Road, Yanchep
All signs that do not fit the abovementioned criteria will be removed.
Comment
The first two kilometres of Old Yanchep Road are contained within the Yanchep National Park. This road is narrow and winding, though recently some shoulder maintenance work has been undertaken. Whilst the speed limit in this section of Old Yanchep Road defaults to 110km/h, the Traffic Code 2000 under Regulation 18 indicates that it does not “justify a driver driving at a speed that may constitute driving carelessly, recklessly or at a speed, or in a manner, that is dangerous to the public, having regard to all the circumstance.” The road then reverts to being a local road which is wider and shoulders are of a good standard. It is possible to travel on this section of road at the default speed limit of 110km/h.
In considering the above information, and in the interest of increasing the level of safety for all road users, it is suggested that the proposed changes to the speed limit be supported in addition to the installation of the curve warning signs.
Statutory Compliance
MRWA is responsible for speed zoning and the installation of regulatory signage. As part of its speed zoning procedure, MRWA has sought Council’s concurrence to the reduction in the speed limit on Pinjar Road and to the installation of additional curve warning signs in Old Yanchep Road.
Strategic Implications
The proposals to reduce the speed limit in a section of Pinjar Road to just north of Wattle Road to 90km/h, and the proposal to install additional curve warning signs, are consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s Strategic Plan. In particular, it meets the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSEs the following speed limit proposals for Old Yanchep Road/Pinjar Road and advises Main Roads WA accordingly:-
1. The existing sign indicating “90/End 90” speed zone change, located 320m north of Spence Road to be relocated to 600m north of Wattle Avenue (east) as shown on Attachment 1.
2. The existing default speed limit of 110km/h, from 600m north of Wattle Avenue (east) to Wanneroo Road, Yanchep to remain unchanged.
3. The installation of additional curve warning signs with advisory speed limit tags, at various locations north of Cutler Road as follows:
90km/h Curve warning sign – 460m south of Hopkins Road
90km/h Curve warning sign – 190m north of Hopkins Road
90km/h Curve warning sign – 2.01km north of Cutler Road
90km/h Curve warning sign – 2.33km north of Cutler Road
90km/h Curve warning sign – 3.67km north of Cutler Road
90km/h Curve warning sign – 3.93km north of Cutler Road
80km/h Curve warning sign – 4.04km north of Cutler Road
80km/h Curve warning sign – 4.32km north of Cutler Road
80km/h Curve warning sign – 5.34km north of Cutler Road
80km/h Curve warning sign – 5.70km north of Cutler Road
70km/h Curve warning sign – 5.82km north of Cutler Road
70km/h Curve warning sign – 6.22km north of Cutler Road
4. The installation of narrow road warning sign - 6.37km north of Cutler Road.
5. The installation of winding road warning sign (westbound) - 6.42km north of Cutler Road.
6. The installation of winding road warning sign (eastbound) – 40m south of Wanneroo Road, Yanchep.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R34/0015V01
File Name: BADundebar Road Wanneroo Parking Restrictions.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Tiiu Stojanovic
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the installation of a timed parking bay in front of the Civic Centre in Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
Background
On both sides of Dundebar Road immediately adjacent to the Civic Centre there are two embayed bus zones that are not clearly signed. Many ratepayers and couriers pull into the bus embayments in order to undertake “quick” transactions at the City’s front desk.
Some of the ratepayers and couriers have received infringements for illegally parking in the bus embayments and consequently have requested that the City consider altering the embayment on the northern side of Dundebar Road to incorporate a 15 minute timed parking stall.
Detail
The consideration of a timed parking stall would allow
ratepayers and couriers the opportunity to easily access the front desk for up
to a 15 minute duration. As there is a fire hydrant located adjacent to the
bus embayment it is considered prudent to allow motor cyclists to park in the
space adjacent to the fire hydrant, and to install a 7 metre long parking stall
for cars and vans to the east of this point, both as shown on City of Wanneroo
Drawing No T1879-1-0 at
Attachment 1.
It is also proposed to remove the existing “No standing Anytime Except Buses” signs from the bus embayments in Dundebar Road and replace these with the standard “Bus Zone” signs.
Consultation
As the location of this proposal is in front of the Civic Centre, the only consultation that was considered necessary was with Transperth, advising them of this modification. As the bus embayment is considerably longer than required, Transperth advised that the introduction of 15 minute parking stalls would not impact on bus accessibility and that they do not have any objection to the proposal.
Comment
There is no impediment to the installation of a timed permissive parking stall in this bus embayment and it is suggested that 15 minutes is long enough for any “quick” transactions necessary in the Civic Centre. However, the installation of signage that conforms to both the Australian Standards and the Traffic Code 2000 is recommended.
Statutory Compliance
Division 7, Regulation 172 of the Traffic Code 2000 provides information of “permissive parking”, whilst Regulation 154 of the Traffic Code 2000 indicates what is permitted within bus zones.
Strategic Implications
This proposal to install parking restrictions in Dundebar Road, Wanneroo is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “Parking 15 Minutes M/C Only” and “Parking 15 Minutes” signs on the northern side of Dundebar Road as shown on Drawing No T 1879-1-0 at Attachment 1.
2. APPROVES the removal of the existing “No Standing Anytime – Except Buses” signs in Dundebar Road as shown on Drawing No T 1879-1-0 at Attachment 1.
3. APPROVES the installation of “Bus Zones” signs in Dundebar Road as shown on Drawing No T 1879-1-0 at Attachment 1.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R19/0007V01
File Name: BAAddington Way Marangaroo Parking Prohibitions.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by jan Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Glen Shaw
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the installation of parking prohibitions on Addington Way, Marangaroo.
Background
Parents accessing Marangaroo Primary School use the road network surrounding the school perimeter for parking. Parking embayments are located on Addington Way, opposite the school but with the advent of 4 year old and pre primary schooling on the site, the instances of verge and illegal parking have increased. Currently parents are parking on both sides of Addington Way in any available area along the verge or carriageway, with this activity causing severe congestion and also restricting pedestrian sight distance.
Detail
Parents parking illegally on the south side of Addington Way obstruct residents access to their properties and compromise sight distance for children as they cross at the dedicated crossing points. In addition, this activity restricts vehicle movements when egressing the school car park. This issue has been raised by a concerned resident of Addington Way and is supported by principal of Marangaroo Primary School.
Consultation
Consultation has taken place with the residents of Addington Way who will be affected by the parking prohibitions. Letters seeking comment on the proposed parking prohibitions have been hand delivered to the residents and there have been no objections raised. The Principal of Marangaroo Primary School has also endorsed these prohibitions.
Comment
The installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge” at the Higham Road/Addington Way intersection and “No Stopping Road or Verge 7.30-9am, 2.30-4pm, School Days” signs on the southern side of Addington Way as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T1870-1-1 (Attachment 1) will preserve the residents’ amenity and enhance sight distance for motorists and the pedestrians. It will also address the road safety concerns regarding child pedestrian and cyclists as they cross Addington Way.
Statutory Compliance
Section 143 (3) of the Traffic Code 2000 indicates that vehicles are not allowed to stop within 10 metres of an intersecting carriageway. The prohibition signs will allow enforcement of this particular section of the Traffic Code and enhance sight distance at intersections.
Strategic Implications
This proposal to install parking prohibition signs in Addington Way, Marangaroo is consistent with the goal of “Healthy Communities” in the City’s draft Strategic Plan and in particular with the objective to support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge” signs at the Higham Way/Addington Way intersection as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T1870-1-1 at Attachment 1.
2. APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping Road or Verge 7.30– 9am, 2.30 – 4pm, School Days.” signs on the southern side of Addington Way as shown on City of Wanneroo Drawing No T1870-1-1 at Attachment 1.
3. NOTIFIES the Principal of Marangaroo Primary School and the residents of Addington Way of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: PA14/0002V01
File Name: CAPetition Public Open Space Belgrade Park Estate Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Jim Duff
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a petition objecting to the installation of barbecue facilities on the future development of the Public Open Space (POS) abutting the Belgrade Park Retirement Village, Belgrade Road, Wanneroo.
Background
A 154 signature petition was presented to Council at its meeting on 24 September 2002. Residents have expressed concerns regarding the potential development of the POS abutting the north/west corner of the Belgrade Park Retirement Village, refer Attachment 1. In particular the residents are opposed to any installation of barbecue facilities and also request that the POS be cleared of man-made rubbish and fire hazards.
Detail
The POS referred to by the petitioners is yet to be developed. At this point in time the land in question is under subdivisional development by a private land developer, in accordance with Western Australian Planning Commission Conditions of Subdivision dated 17 January 2001, (WAPC 114870). City Administration has approved the engineering plans associated with this development but have not yet received any proposal with regard to the development of the proposed POS from the developer. As a result, the land in total, i.e., land being developed into roads and residential properties and future land to be declared POS, is still under private ownership.
Although there is no formal request for the developer of the land to develop this POS, “Advice to Applicant” forming part of the Conditions of Subdivision, states:
“3) With respect to the proposed POS area, the subdivider is advised of the following:
i) The existing landform, vegetation and drainage patterns of the proposed POS areas are not to be disturbed or modified without the prior approval of the Local Government.
ii) Plans for any proposed development of the POS area are to be submitted to, and approved by the Local Government prior to the commencement of any works.
iii) Road batters are not to intrude into proposed areas of POS without the prior approval of the Local Government.”
The petitioners have outlined their concerns with the potential for anti-social behaviour associated with the installation of barbecue facilities. This, from City Administration’s point of view, is believed to be a perceived concern rather than a quantified fact, particularly given the barbecue facilities do not currently exist. In addition, the petitioners have also expressed concern with the accumulation of man-made rubbish and the potential fire risk from existing vegetation, which City Administration will request the developer to clear away and fire breaks established.
Consultation
The City’s Infrastructure Development Coordinator contacted the petition organiser by telephone to gain a better understanding of the concerns raised. Advice given in follow up with the petition organiser was that the developer of the land in question will be notified to remove any unnecessary materials or rubbish from the proposed POS area. Furthermore, they will be required to clear and/or install the necessary fire breaks.
Comment
Installation of barbecue facilities forming part of any proposal that may be promoted by the developer of the land will be assessed by the City Administration in light of the needs of the greater community as well as the issues raised by the petitioners.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The response to the petition deals directly with the City’s goals relating to “Healthy Communities” supported by the objective to “Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future” in conjunction with “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. CONSIDERS the installation of any proposed barbecue facilities in light of the needs of the greater community as well as the petitioners at the time of assessment of any landscape proposal for the development of the public open space in Belgrade Park Estate, Wanneroo.
2. REQUESTS the land developer to maintain appropriate fire breaks and remove any unnatural material causing offence from the proposed public open space on the land being developed.
3. NOTIFY the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S34/0002V01
File Name: DASalofA.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the sale of the surplus Hydra Pac aluminium can baler at the Wangara Material Recycling Facility (MRF).
Background
Council commissioned its Wangara MRF in 1990 and one of the items of equipment was a Hydra Pac 11kw HCB400 aluminium can baler, Asset No 15169. In 2000 the City had to install a new, high capacity aluminium baler as the old unit was not able to keep up with the workload. The operational needs of the MRF have been reviewed and this unit is no longer required.
Detail
The Hydra Pac aluminium can baler is in working order but significant maintenance will be required on the main hydraulic ram to keep this baler operational.
The City has used Smith Broughton and Sons recently to auction surplus equipment and they were asked to provide an estimate of the likely price to be achieved at auction for the aluminium can baler. The advice received was that unless a specialist purchaser was found, then the unit would be expected to return about $4,000, less normal auction expenses. This is based on the value of the hydraulic system on the baler.
C D Dodd are scrap metal merchants and currently purchase the baled aluminium from the Wangara Recycling Facility. The company has a use for the unit at its recycling operation at Bunbury and has made an offer of $7,150 ($6500 + GST)
Comment
The Hydra Pac aluminium can baler is old and no longer suitable for a high workload. It is also in need of maintenance and the sale of the unit is appropriate.
Balers are specialised units with long operational lives and there is a limited second-hand market due to the spasmodic customer demand for such units.
C D Dodd currently has a use for such a unit and has offered a reasonable market price. This price is significantly in excess of what which would probably be achieved by tender or public auction.
Statutory Compliance
Any disposal of assets valued at less than $20,000 is exempt from the requirements of Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act, and is not required to be disposed of by tender or auction. The Chief Executive Officer has been delegated authority to approve disposal of goods to the value of $5,000. Disposal of surplus/redundant goods/equipment valued between $5,000 and $20,000 requires Council approval.
Strategic Implications
The disposal of the surplus Hydra Pac aluminium can baler is in line with the Strategic Plan in the following areas:
1.2 Develop sustainable waste management options
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The sale of surplus aluminium can baler at a fair market price will make funds available for inclusion in the general revenue for the current year.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the offer from C D Dodd of $7150 for the purchase of the Hydra Pac aluminium can baler, Asset No 15169, which is surplus to operational requirements at the Wangara Materials Recovery Facility.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S17/0006VO1
File Name: EABus Shelter Grant Scheme.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 31 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Rob Korenhof
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To seek endorsement of the design and installation of the proposed “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” to be funded as part of the 2002/2003 Bus Shelter Grants Scheme promoted by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure.
Background
In a report presented to Council at its meeting on 19 March 2002 (Report No. TS06-03/02 refers) it was advised that the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) through its Bus Shelter Grants Scheme confirmed an allocation of $30,000 as its dollar for dollar contribution to the fabrication and installation of ten (10) bus shelters at various sites located within the City of Wanneroo. Council, when considering the 2002/2003 Capital Works budget approved its allocation of $30,000 to match the DPI contribution along with a further $10,000 allocated for removal of existing concrete bus shelters and making good the site prior to installation proceeding on the Bus Shelter Grant Scheme shelters. In total, $70,000 is available for this project.
The previous report noted that the bus shelter design needed to comply with DPI design criteria, in particular the need to include a minimum of 50% transparent material on a minimum of two side panels. This criteria suggests that glass be used unless another material is available in replacement. The proposal from City Administration’s perspective was to design a bus shelter that avoids the use of glass, with the aim of reducing the high maintenance cost associated as a result of vandalism that is currently occurring with the bus shelters provided by Adshel Street Furniture Pty Ltd before handover to the City after 15 years. Given this scenario City Administration challenged itself to design, fabricate and install a bus shelter within a $6,000 budget. Before formalising this action City Administration was to seek both Council endorsement and DPI approval.
Detail
City Administration design personal reviewed the Bus Shelter Grant Scheme design criteria, prepare a number of concepts and finally settled on a simple yet clean design that was then budget costed. The outcome of this process revealed that the design needed to be further streamlined as costs obtained were in excess of $10,000 per bus shelter, ie., in the vicinity of 70% over budget. On reviewing materials being utilised and also having the design vetted by a structural engineer to determine structural member integrity and foundation requirements, the design was again budget costed. The outcome of the budget costing exercise on a per bus shelter basis is summarised as follows:
ITEM |
BUDGET COST |
Bus Shelter material supply, fabrication and installation |
$5,750 |
Concrete footing and slab |
$2,800 |
Tactile paving |
$700 |
TOTAL COST per BUS SHELTER |
$9,250 |
It is noted that four fabricators/installers were sourced for budget costing purpose, three concrete suppliers/placers and two tactile paving suppliers/installers. The lowest budget price in each of the categories noted is represented in above table.
A further allowance of $1,000 per site for the removal of the existing concrete bus shelter/making good the site needs also to be included on a site-by-site basis.
Given the allocated budget for the project is $70,000 and expenditure of $900 has already been committed for the structural engineering review, only six, possibly seven shelters, could be supplied and installed given the accuracy of the budget costing process undertaken.
Copies of the City’s design drawings, Drawing No. T1845-1-0 and T1845-2-0 are attached to the report (refer Attachment 1). It is noted that the design includes a stylistic representation of the City of Wanneroo with the roof support displaying the letter “W” that can be seen from both the bus approach and departure directions. Hence the advent of the“City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter”.
On review of potential sites for location of the new bus shelter the following sites have been identified and prioritised on the basis of primarily commercial location, ie., in the immediate vicinity of local shopping centres, secondly on the major road network where Adshel bus shelters have not been installed due to Adshel’s criteria relating to advertising sight lines being compromised and thirdly, site upgrade. Ten (10) sites were reviewed prior to finally establishing the budget costing discussed above and are as follows:
Proposed Site |
Locality |
Priority |
Priority Basis |
East side of Girrawheen Avenue/South of Wade Street opposite the Sommerfield Shopping Centre |
Girrawheen |
1 |
Commercial location |
West side of Templeton Avenue/South of Marangaroo Drive adjacent to the Newpark Shopping Centre |
Girrawheen |
2 |
|
East side of Templeton Avenue/South of Marangaroo Drive opposite the Newpark Shopping Centre |
Girrawheen |
3 |
Commercial location |
North side of Koondoola Avenue/West of Hollingsworth Avenue adjacent to the Koondoola Plaza |
Koondoola |
4 |
Commercial location |
East side of Baltimore Parade/North of Palermo Court near the Merriwa Shopping Plaza |
Merriwa |
5 |
Commercial location |
East side of Renshaw Boulevard adjacent to the Clarkson Shopping Centre |
Clarkson |
6 |
Commercial |
East side of Wanneroo Road/North of Buckingham Drive adjacent to the Wangara Industrial Estate |
Wangara |
7 |
Commercial location and advertising sightlines compromised |
East side of Wanneroo Road/South of Wallawa Street adjacent to the Joondalup Lifestyle Village |
Ashby |
8 |
|
East side of Wanneroo Road/South of Elliot Road adjacent to Greenfields Park |
Wanneroo |
9 |
|
East side of Rothesay Heights/North of AbbervilleCircuit adjacent to Abberville Park |
Mindarie |
10 |
Site upgrade |
It is noted that concrete bus shelters are located at all sites tabled above and need to be relocated.
Consultation
In support of the budget costing process the DPI was also contacted to determine whether the design as being promoted with the use of perforated mesh as the transparent material would meet the design criteria. Both the design and use of perforated mesh was endorsed by the DPI with final approval subject to Council endorsement being received.
Also discussed with the DPI was the fact that City Administration’s endeavours to design a bus shelter in accordance with the Bus Shelter Grant scheme design criteria, and be supplied and installed for $6,000 has not proved possible. It was requested whether the grant of $30,000 approved for ten (10) shelters could be maintained to finance a lessor number of shelters. The DPI advised that the maximum contribution on a per bus shelter basis is $5,000 and therefore the grant as approved could finance a minimum six bus shelters.
Comment
To further the impasse that City Administration has found itself in as a result of not managing to reduce the total cost to meet its $6,000 per bus shelter target as reported to Council at its meeting on 19 March 2002, it is proposed that Council consider approval to proceed on the basis of tendering the supply and installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” within the allocated funding available and in accordance with the prioritised site listing documented previously in this report.
The final number of sites where installation of the ”City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” are proposed will be subject to the tendered cost of the work received by the City. City Administration is therefore requesting Council’s endorsement of the design. Formal DPI approval will then be sought before proceeding with tenders for supply and installation.
The concrete bus shelters that are displaced as a result of
this project will be relocated to sites within the bus transport network in
accordance with the City’s Bus Shelter Installation Program.
This program is developed on a continuing basis as a result of requests
forwarded by residents for provision of bus shelters with shelters installed
subject to site investigation, traffic sightline assessment, patronage data,
and shelter availability within the City’s current stock. On the basis that
these criteria are met, City Administration then undertakes localised public
consultation and subject to assessment of public consultation feedback, acts in
accordance with the outcome arising.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The outcome of Council’s consideration with respect to giving endorsement to the “City of Wanneroo” bus shelter design and receiving the approval of the DPI will support the City’s goal relating to “Healthy Communities” and the supporting objective “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”, in particular to “Explore opportunities for the re-development of existing facilities and areas to be more suited to changing community needs”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A project budget of $70,000 has been allocated for the installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” in accordance with design criteria laid out as part of the Bus Shelter Grant Scheme being promoted by the DPI. Of the $70,000 allocated to the project, $30,000 in funding has been secured through the Bus Shelter Grant Scheme, another $30,000 allocated by the City on a dollar for dollar basis and a further $10,000 allocated by the City to remove existing concrete bus shelters that are displaced by the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” and/or making good the site.
As a consequence of undertaking a budget costing exercise City Administration has not been able to finalise a design that reduces the total cost of supply and installation to meet its target of $6,000 as reported to Council at its meeting on 19 March 2002.
Given a total of $900 has already been expended to undertake a structural engineering appraisal of the proposed design and allowing for the $10,000 cost budgeted for the removal of the existing concrete bus shelter and/or making good the site, a sum of $59,100 minimum is available for the installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters. On review of the 2002/2003 Operating and Maintenance Budget the cost associated with the removal of existing concrete bus shelters and/or making good the various sites can be accommodated within the Bus Shelter Maintenance Budget which in turn would allow at least one (1) further “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter to be installed on the basis of the budget costs obtained by City Administration.
This effectively gives a maximum of $69,100 in Capital Works funding available for the installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters”, unless alternative funding is sourced for additional bus shelters at the time of tender consideration by Council.
To proceed this matter City Administration is recommending that subject to obtaining formal DPI approval of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter”, tenders will be called for the supply and installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” within the allocated funding available and in accordance with the prioritised site listing documented previously in this report.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter” design as detailed on the Drawing Nos. T1845-1-0 and T1845-2-0 as per Attachment 1.
2. SEEKS the approval for the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter” design as detailed on the Drawing Nos. T1845-1-0 and T1845-2-0 from the Department for Planning and Infrastructure.
3. On receipt of Department for Planning and Infrastructure approval for the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelter” design as detailed on the Drawing Nos. T1845-1-0 and T1845-2-0, T1845-1-0 and T1845-2-0 calls tenders on the basis of supply and installation of the “City of Wanneroo Bus Shelters” within the allocated Capital Works funding available and in accordance with the following prioritised site listing.
Proposed Site |
Locality |
Priority |
Priority Basis |
East side of Girrawheen Avenue/South of Wade Street opposite the Sommerfield Shopping Centre, |
Girrawheen |
1 |
Commercial location |
West side of Templeton Avenue/South of Marangaroo Drive adjacent to the Newpark Shopping Centre |
Girrawheen |
2 |
Commercial location |
East side of Templeton Avenue/South of Marangaroo Drive opposite the Newpark Shopping Centre |
Girrawheen |
3 |
Commercial location |
North side of Koondoola Avenue/West of Hollingsworth Avenue adjacent to the Koondoola Plaza |
Koondoola |
4 |
Commercial location |
East side of Baltimore Parade/North of Palermo Court near the Merriwa Shopping Plaza |
Merriwa |
5 |
Commercial location |
East side of Renshaw Boulevard adjacent to the Clarkson Shopping Centre |
Clarkson |
6 |
Commercial location |
East side of Wanneroo Road/North of Buckingham Drive adjacent to the Wangara Industrial Estate |
Wangara |
7 |
Commercial location and advertising sightlines compromised |
East side of Wanneroo Road/South of Wallawa Street adjacent to the Joondalup Lifestyle Village |
Ashby |
8 |
Advertising sightlines compromised |
East side of Wanneroo Road/South of Elliot Road adjacent to Greenfields Park |
Wanneroo |
9 |
Advertising sightlines compromised |
East side of Rothesay Heights/North of AbbervilleCircuit adjacent to Abberville Park |
Mindarie |
10 |
Site upgrade |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref:
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Issue
To consider a budget variation to accommodate the shortfall in funding for the resurfacing of the tennis courts at Hudson Park, Girrawheen.
Background
The 2002/03 Capital Works Budget incorporated tennis court resurfacing funding as follows:
· Project No 3242 – Montrose Park $18,000
· Project No 3243 – Hudson Park $18,000
Detail
Quotations were invited from contractors to undertake tennis court resurfacing at Montrose Park and Hudson Park. After the evaluation of these quotations, a contractor was appointed to undertake resurfacing works at Montrose Park Tennis Courts. The cost of all works at Montrose Park Tennis Courts is $13,780 which will result in a saving of $4,220 in Project Number 3242.
The scope of works for the Hudson Park Tennis Court resurfacing has been upgraded to incorporate a rubber cushion overlay to address the severe cracking of the courts. Normally a fibreglass overlay is specified for the treatment of minor cracking. Quotations were invited in accordance with this revised scope of works. Evaluation of the quotations has highlighted that tennis court resurfacing works at Hudson Park will cost $21,760.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Due to the poor condition of the Hudson Park tennis courts, the revised scope of works included additional preparatory works to be undertaken prior to acrylic resurfacing. The inclusion of a rubber cushion overlay is recommended to minimise reflective cracking through the tennis court surface and provide for a longer surface life. This has resulted in a shortfall of funding.
Since the Montrose Park and Hudson Park tennis court resurfacing projects were budgeted under the same “Sports Facilities” category in the Capital Works Budget for 2002/03, it is considered appropriate to reallocate the savings from Montrose Park (Project No 3242) to Hudson Park (Project No 3243).
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The resurfacing of tennis courts to a standard to maximise the life of the court surface is in line with the City’s Strategic Plan in the following area:
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The proposed budget reallocation is within the existing allocated funds for capital works and therefore does not present any additional financial liability to the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES that the proposed rubber cushion overlay treatment to address the severe cracking to the Hudson Park tennis courts has resulted in a funding shortfall of $3,760.
2. NOTES the following budget variation to reflect the reallocation of surplus funds from Montrose Park tennis court resurfacing project to meet the shortfall in funding for the Hudson Park tennis court resurfacing works.
Cost Code |
From |
To |
Description |
Project Number 3242 |
$3,760 |
|
Montrose Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing |
Project Number 3243 |
|
$3,760 |
Hudson Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
File Ref: R0010VO1
File Name: GAStreetside Advertising Proposed Settlement.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 22 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 22 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 22 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Dennis Blair
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To advise on the outcome of the joint Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup,“without prejudice” settlement offer to Streetside Advertising and seek approval to negotiate acceptable outcomes to this contractural dispute.
Background
Council considered a confidential report on the Streetside Advertising Proposed Settlement at its meeting on 30 April 2002 and resolved that the City make a “without prejudice” offer to Streetside Advertising in accordance with the terms outlined in the report (Report No CD01-04/02 refers).
Detail
On 17 May 2002, a “without prejudice” offer on behalf of the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup was presented by Watts and Woodhouse on behalf of both Cities, subject to:
a) Formalisation, in the form of a deed of release and settlement to be prepared by the Cities solicitors containing terms and conditions considered satisfactory by the Cities, and
b) Approval of the deed by both Councils.
As no response had been received by 14 June 2002, a further request was lodged by Watts and Woodhouse on behalf of both Cities on the same date requesting a response to the “without prejudice” offer.
A meeting was subsequently held on 31 July 2002 between the Chief Executive Officer (Wanneroo), Director, Technical Services (Wanneroo), Director, Infrastructure and Operations (Joondalup) and Streetside Advertising to discuss the compensation claim and subsequent “without prejudice” offer from the two Cities. It was agreed that a negotiated outcome to this matter, rather than an up front payment, may be possible. Streetside Advertising agreed to put an offer in writing to Watts and Woodhouse.
Comment
The legal representatives acting on behalf of Streetside Advertising advised on 15 August 2002 of their client’s rejection of the Cities’ offer of 17 May 2002.
Two alternative options were presented for consideration and subject to formalisation of a deed of release and settlement.
These options would involve the City of Wanneroo in an ongoing business relationship with Streetside Advertising rather than an upfront payment and conclusion to the matter. Further clarification and negotiation of possible terms and conditions is required with regard to the options presented.
Council’s resolution of 30 April 2002 related to a “without prejudice” offer and as this has not been successful, and in accordance with the City’s legal advice approval is now sought to negotiate a revised settlement proposal.
Statutory Compliance
Required to comply with the requirements of Contract Law and the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
Healthy Communities – Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The financial implications are subject to a negotiated mutual agreement between Streetside Advertising and the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate a “without prejudice” deed of release and settlement with Streetside Advertising, subject to Council’s final approval of the deed.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R27/0001VO1, R27/0005VO1
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Brett Carter
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 3
File Name: GATAPPING WAY QUINNS ROCKS VARIOUS ISSUES.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 31 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 23 October 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a petition regarding the standard of a drainage sump in Tapping Way, Quinns Rocks and the proposed traffic treatment of Tapping Way.
Background
A 22 signature petition was presented to Council at its meeting on 24 September 2002 addressing the existing condition of a drainage sump located adjacent to the eastern side of Tapping Way just south of its intersection with Robinson Avenue. The petition sought to have the chain fence replaced with a timber or metal fence. The petition also enquired about the status of proposed traffic management works to be undertaken at the intersection of Tapping Way and Robinson Avenue, refer Attachment 1.
The sump was constructed as part of land subdivisional development undertaken for the Osprey Estate, Quinns Rocks. It has been installed in accordance with the City’s standard specifications. The fence construction consists of chainmesh, wire and metal poles which is consistent with other such facilities throughout the City and prevents pedestrian access to the sumps, refer Attachment 2. Fencing surrounding sumps of other than the chainmesh type, ie., installed to the City’s specifications, have been installed to a higher standard at the land developer’s own cost.
Council considered a report on the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Tapping Way and Morialta Avenue, Quinns Rocks at its meeting on 30 April 2002 and resolved to undertake further community consultation in order to determine appropriate traffic calming treatments that are acceptable to the residents of Tapping Way and connecting streets, (Report TS13-04/02 refers). A number of meetings were held and a preferred treatment prepared for consideration by Main Roads WA before referral to Council.
Detail
The City’s Operational officers have inspected the drainage sump referred to in the petition. The fence around the sump is considered to be in a good condition and does not require replacement. General maintenance with regard to weed control etc was noted and has been scheduled for followup action.
Design relating to traffic arrangement works planned for the corner of Tapping Way and Robinson Avenue is being finalised by City Administration and will form part of a separate report to Council at its meeting scheduled for 26 November 2002 which will address the review of proposed traffic management works relating to the full length at Tapping Way
Comment
In addressing the matter of what has been described by the petitioners as “a wilderness and extremely unsightly sump”, refer Attachment 2, City Administration is suggesting that the drainage sump be screened effectively by landscaping the area around with bottlebrush. This type of planting has proved effective in screening similar sumps within this area, refer Attachment 3. Planting is ideally undertaken at the beginning of winter, given the site is not irrigated. This would give the plants an opportunity to establish themselves and maximise their survival rate.
It is proposed to conduct the planting with a community group as part of either Arbor Day or Planet Arc Day celebrations.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The response to the petition deals directly with the City’s goals relating to:
2.4 Support and encourage the delivery of safe and effective transport network
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Planting of bottlebrush as a screen is estimated to cost $1,000 for the initial planting and $1,350 for establishment maintenance for 2 years, a total of $2,350. It is proposed that this cost be accommodated from the Operations Park Maintenance Budget as part of the annual winter Tree Planting Program.
Subject to the report to be presented to Council at its meeting scheduled for 26 November 2002, upgrading works in Tapping Way will be funded from project funding allocated for Quinns Rocks Traffic Management Capital Works.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT REPLACE the chain mesh fencing to the drainage sump on the eastern side of Tapping Way, just south of Robinson Avenue.
2. plants the area surrounding the sump with screening bottlebrush during the winter 2003 planting season.
3. CONSIDERS the traffic management component of the petition relating to the Tapping Way/Robinson Avenue intersection as part of the proposed report addressing the review of proposed traffic management works relating to the full length of Tapping Way.
4. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S13/0002V01
File Name: BAWarrant of Payments for the Period to 30 September 2002.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT
Level 5 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 21 October 2002delete
Level 2 Approval by MIKE COLE Date 18 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by MIKE COLE Date 18 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of September 2002, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers |
28999 - 29741 50000434 - 50000440 |
$3,798,812.21 |
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account |
000182 - 000183 |
$4,937,092.72 |
City of Wanneroo –Town Planning Scheme Accounts |
000020 |
$5,566.28 |
At the close of September 2002 outstanding creditors amounted to $1,215,302.02.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The list of cheques and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of September 2002 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of cheques drawn for the month of September 2002, as summarised below:-.
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers |
28999 - 29741 50000434 - 50000440 |
$3,798,812.21
|
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account |
000182 – 000183 |
$4,937,092.72 |
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme Accounts |
000020 |
$5,566.28 |
Warrant of Payments for the Month of August 2002 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account |
Cheque No |
Cheque Date |
Vendor Name |
Amount |
Details |
||
28999 |
02-Sep-02 |
TWO ROCKS VOLUNTEER SEA RESCUE GROUP INC |
$55,000.00 |
2002/2003 DONATIONS |
||
29000 |
04-Sep-02 |
SPINELESS WONDERS WILDLIFE EDUCATION INCURSIONS |
$185.00 |
PRESENTATION FOR WANNEROO FAMILY DAY CARE MEMBERS |
||
29001 |
04-Sep-02 |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNERS ASSOCIATION |
$40.00 |
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 24 JULY 2002 AT HYATT HOTEL - CLEMENT WILLIAMS (MEMBER) |
||
29002 |
04-Sep-02 |
MEERILINGA TRAINING COLLEGE |
$132.00 |
THE ORDINARY MOMENT - A COURSE FOR MICHELLE BENDER |
||
29003 |
04-Sep-02 |
ALAN SAVAGE |
$20.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29004 |
04-Sep-02 |
EVENTSCORP WESTERN AUSTRALIA |
$250.00 |
TWO ENTRY FEES FOR RALLY AUSTRALIA TRIAL EVENT - YOUTH SERVICES |
||
29005 |
04-Sep-02 |
OLIVER MORRIS & NICOLE STEPHENS |
$287.10 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29006 |
04-Sep-02 |
INJURY CONTROL COUNCIL OF WA |
$10.00 |
FALLS INJURY PREVENTION SEMINAR - MR LUAT DUONG |
||
29007 |
04-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL JORDON |
$20.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - 1/2 YEARLY |
||
29008 |
04-Sep-02 |
OLGA JOWETT |
$6.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
||
29009 |
04-Sep-02 |
PATRICIA WOTZKO |
$12.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
||
29010 |
04-Sep-02 |
KATE MUDFORD |
$57.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29011 |
04-Sep-02 |
KATHRYN PHILLIPS |
$15.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29012 |
04-Sep-02 |
SUZANNE WOODALL |
$10.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - 1/2 YEARLY |
||
29013 |
04-Sep-02 |
JAY WAKEFIELD |
$15.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - 1/2 YEARLY |
||
29014 |
04-Sep-02 |
WILLIAM KIELY |
$15.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - 1/2 YEARLY |
||
29015 |
04-Sep-02 |
ANTHONY DEHNEL |
$6.00 |
ANIMAL REGISTRATION REFUND - ANIMAL DECEASED |
||
29016 |
04-Sep-02 |
JOEL BARRY DING |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29017 |
04-Sep-02 |
GREGG W HUMBERSTON |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29018 |
04-Sep-02 |
TERRENCE K OLDEN |
$335.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29019 |
04-Sep-02 |
DANIEL M KILLEN |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29020 |
04-Sep-02 |
MURRAY F GREENE |
$265.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29021 |
04-Sep-02 |
G & JM PONTARELLI |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29022 |
04-Sep-02 |
GARETH E PROCTOR |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29023 |
04-Sep-02 |
LM BRUNNEN & DR SINDALL |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29024 |
04-Sep-02 |
EDWARD & JADWIGH POWERLOWITZ |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29025 |
04-Sep-02 |
C & SE DUNN |
$220.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29026 |
04-Sep-02 |
KL HARDEY & NL BAXTER |
$278.55 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29027 |
04-Sep-02 |
PC BARRETT & AL SIMONSEN |
$235.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29028 |
04-Sep-02 |
TERRI E MILLION |
$325.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29029 |
04-Sep-02 |
GRAEME & DEBORAH FESTA |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29030 |
04-Sep-02 |
N AZCUE & AM BEGGS |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29031 |
04-Sep-02 |
SIMON ANDREW KOT |
$112.86 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29032 |
04-Sep-02 |
ALLMARK & ASSOCIATES |
$811.25 |
POLO SHIRTS EMBROIDERED |
||
29033 |
04-Sep-02 |
CLINTON LONG PROJECT |
$20,022.75 |
GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM REFURBISHMENT |
||
29034 |
04-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP INDUSTRIAL HEALTH |
$66.00 |
PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL FOR L. ALLEN |
||
29035 |
04-Sep-02 |
TURFMASTER PTY LTD |
$1,671.16 |
MINTARO PARK TURFING WORKS RELEASE 5% RETENTION |
||
29036 |
04-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH |
$61.30 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29037 |
04-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$67.85 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29038 |
04-Sep-02 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29039 |
04-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$20.00 |
P/N126178 CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP - RATES REFUND |
||
29040 |
04-Sep-02 |
STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$296.70 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29041 |
04-Sep-02 |
6TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE - MATURITY MATTERS |
$395.00 |
REGISTRATION FEES FOR CR GRIERSON TO ATTEND 6TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE |
||
29042 |
04-Sep-02 |
NICK DEL BORRELLO |
$1,537.25 |
LABOUR WORK ORDER FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP |
||
29043 |
04-Sep-02 |
QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH |
$47.15 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29044 |
04-Sep-02 |
YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS LIBRARY PETTY CASH |
$45.85 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29045 |
04-Sep-02 |
YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE P/CASH |
$107.55 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29046 |
04-Sep-02 |
BBC ENTERTAINMENT |
$550.00 |
FINAL PAYMENT ON PERFORMANCE OF BUZZ DANCE THEATRE - GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM OPEN DAY |
||
29047 |
04-Sep-02 |
SANDRA EAKINS |
$72.50 |
CANCELLATION OF BOOKING REFUND OF BALANCE |
||
29048 |
04-Sep-02 |
BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS |
$128.99 |
BOOK PURCHASES 2002/2003 FOR THE MOBILE LIBRARY |
||
29049 |
04-Sep-02 |
ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD |
$495.00 |
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION |
||
29050 |
04-Sep-02 |
FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES AUTHORITY OF W A |
$134.48 |
14 FESA VOLUNTEER NAME BADGES |
||
29051 |
04-Sep-02 |
MEDIA ON MARS |
$357.50 |
CHICZ BIZ DL POSTCARD - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
||
29052 |
04-Sep-02 |
MAYDAY EARTHMOVING |
$1,722.00 |
MACHINERY HIRE FOR TECH OPS |
||
29053 |
04-Sep-02 |
TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD |
$90.53 |
SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29054 |
04-Sep-02 |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT INST OF AUST |
$71.50 |
LUNCHEON "MEET THE COACHES" - CLEMENT WILLIAMS |
||
29055 |
04-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES |
$498.45 |
MILK SUPPLIES FOR THE CITY OF WANNEROO |
||
29056 |
04-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$1,120.12 |
MESSENGER POST.REPLY PAID LETTERS SMALL.ITEM CHARGES |
||
29057 |
04-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$9,400.67 |
MAIL PREPARATION FOR JUN AND JULY 02 |
||
29058 |
04-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN OIL SEPARATORS |
$302.50 |
14/08/02 TRANSPORT & PROCESS 2200 LITRES OF WATER PUMPED FROM PT-1340 |
||
29059 |
04-Sep-02 |
ACCESS BOATING & LEISURE |
$109.53 |
SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29060 |
04-Sep-02 |
BELL HEALTH |
$278.77 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR CACP/HACC CLIENTS |
||
29061 |
04-Sep-02 |
BUSHFIRE VOLUNTEER GAMES COMMITTEE |
$500.00 |
THE RUNNING OF THE BUSHFIRE VOLUNTEER GAMES FOR THE YEAR 2002 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION |
||
29062 |
04-Sep-02 |
CABCHARGE |
$80.23 |
CABCHARGE - WELFARE DEPARTMENT |
||
29063 |
04-Sep-02 |
CMP COMMUNICATIONS |
$287.37 |
INSTALLATION OF MULTIPLE BSE RADIOS LOCATED AT FESA |
||
29064 |
04-Sep-02 |
CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD |
$517.50 |
COUNCIL BUFFET MENU 13.08.02 & 1 SUPPER |
||
29065 |
04-Sep-02 |
CONTEK COMMUNICATIONS |
$202.40 |
RAISED TELSTRA PIT LID |
||
29066 |
04-Sep-02 |
DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION |
$17.00 |
COPIES FROM SMARTRIGSTER SYSTEM 2517/672 - PLANNING SERVICES |
||
29067 |
04-Sep-02 |
DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION |
$40.00 |
VALUATION FEES FOR RATING SERVICES |
||
29068 |
04-Sep-02 |
DEPT OF INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY-CAMS |
$42.24 |
TRANSACTION CHARGES FOR WAFASTPAY MAY JUNE & JULY 02 |
||
29069 |
04-Sep-02 |
EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL |
$165.00 |
EUTHANSIA OF DOGS FROM POUND |
||
29070 |
04-Sep-02 |
GO POWER DIESEL SERVICES |
$855.75 |
REPAIRS TO 3126 CAT ENGINE |
||
29071 |
04-Sep-02 |
HOMECARE PURSUITS |
$4,522.96 |
HACC/CACP CLIENT SERVICES |
||
29072 |
04-Sep-02 |
LEISURE INSTITUTE OF W A AQUATICS |
$290.00 |
CONFERENCE 2002 REGISTRATION FEE FOR STEVE GOOD & DAVE LISTER |
||
29073 |
04-Sep-02 |
MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER |
$917.11 |
COURIER SERVICES JUNE 2002 |
||
29074 |
04-Sep-02 |
MERCURY FIRE SAFETY |
$1,090.80 |
INSPECTION & TESTING OF ESSENTIAL FIRE SERVICES JULY 2002 |
||
29075 |
04-Sep-02 |
PERTH PINSTRIPING |
$2,288.00 |
SIGNS/LOGOS FOR SAFER CITIZENS VEHICLES |
||
29076 |
04-Sep-02 |
PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL |
$787.30 |
TRAVEL INSURANCE - HAZEL SMALLWOOD |
||
29077 |
04-Sep-02 |
RANGERS SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH FLOAT FOR CLINT WALKKER - RANGER |
||
29078 |
04-Sep-02 |
SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES |
$73.05 |
DEPOT STORE STOCK - BUSHES AND BROOMS |
||
29079 |
04-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29080 |
04-Sep-02 |
STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS |
$98.67 |
RESPITE SERVICES |
||
29081 |
04-Sep-02 |
STEVEN HART ARCHITECT |
$10,037.50 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT - LANDSCAPE FEES |
||
29082 |
4-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29083 |
04-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO ELECTRIC |
$8,570.76 |
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AT VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29084 |
04-Sep-02 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$4,020.05 |
MEDIAN STRIP-SPRINGHILL PLACE-TWO ROCKS 13 JAN – 9 JULY 2002 WATER SUPPLY – YANCHEP COMMUNITY FACILITY BUILDING |
||
29085 |
04-Sep-02 |
DR C T WONG |
$1,947.50 |
IMMUNISATION CLINICS FOR AUGUST |
||
29086 |
04-Sep-02 |
WESTERN POWER |
$20,850.50 |
POWER USAGE AT VARIOUS FACILITIES |
||
29087 |
04-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO TAVERN |
$290.00 |
BAR STOCK (CEO'S OFFICE) |
||
29088 |
04-Sep-02 |
WESTCARE CENTRAL SAFETY |
$55.33 |
STAFF CLOTHING ISSUE |
||
29089 |
04-Sep-02 |
B WESTON |
$60.00 |
CLEANING OF HALL - GIRRAWHEEN |
||
29090 |
04-Sep-02 |
WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING |
$1,360.50 |
FULL COLOUR NEWSLETTERS 70 CHILDREN’S BOOK WEEK A3 2SIDED RECLYCLING BROCHURES FOR WASTE SERVICES HEPBURN AVENUE NEWSLETTER – TECHNICAL OPERATIONS |
||
29091 |
04-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29092 |
04-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29093 |
06-Sep-02 |
KANTA SOMAROO |
$373.24 |
FAMILY DAY CARE - SALARY FOR FORTNIGHT ENDING 25/08/02 |
||
29094 |
10-Sep-02 |
R & R LEISUREWEAR |
$921.25 |
DELUXE KNIT POLO SHIRTS - AQUAMOTION |
||
29095 |
12-Sep-02 |
BLACK SPLASH |
$60.00 |
CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK WORKSHOP |
||
29096 |
12-Sep-02 |
TRANSPORT PAYMENT CENTRE |
$100.00 |
INFRINGEMENT - FAILURE TO RETURN PLATES WN30855 |
||
29097 |
12-Sep-02 |
E WILSON |
$1,238.60 |
P/N 153725 - RATE REFUND |
||
29098 |
12-Sep-02 |
SAFETY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF WA INC |
$110.00 |
JULY 2002 DONATION |
||
29099 |
12-Sep-02 |
WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD |
$168.57 |
RESPITE CARE FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS |
||
29100 |
12-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL HAYES |
$50.00 |
KEY HOLDER - WANNEROO ROAD BOARD MUSEUM |
||
29101 |
12-Sep-02 |
FM GRIERSON |
$104.71 |
CR GRIERSON - AUGUST TRAVEL EXPENSES |
||
29102 |
12-Sep-02 |
C & T MARCHESE |
$119.44 |
P/N 152386 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29103 |
12-Sep-02 |
L SNAPE |
$270.00 |
PAYMENT OF HONORARIA - COCKMAN HOUSE |
||
29104 |
12-Sep-02 |
M MUNRO |
$270.00 |
PAYMENT OF HONORARIA - BUCKINGHAM HOUSE |
||
29105 |
12-Sep-02 |
NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF |
$257.87 |
339-2002 GJ GREEN BAILIFF FEES |
||
29106 |
12-Sep-02 |
K MART JOONDALUP |
$34.75 |
UPRIGHT FAN HEATER FOR YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS LIBRARY |
||
29107 |
12-Sep-02 |
PARINS |
$1,000.00 |
INSURANCE EXCESS - WN31594 |
||
29108 |
12-Sep-02 |
DJ & NK RICKETTS |
$251.58 |
P/N 170407 - REFUND - OVERPAYMENT OF RATES |
||
29109 |
12-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP & DISTRICTS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE GROUP |
$20.00 |
ORGANISATIONAL MEMBERSHIP FOR HELEN GORDON |
||
29110 |
12-Sep-02 |
BUSH FIRE BRIGADE |
$8,300.00 |
SERVICES PROVIDED DURING THIS FINANCIAL YEAR - QUINNS ROCK |
||
29111 |
12-Sep-02 |
BUSH FIRE BRIGADE |
$8,300.00 |
SERVICES PROVIDED DURING THIS FINANCIAL YEAR - CENTRAL BUSH FIRE BRIGAGE |
||
29112 |
12-Sep-02 |
BBC ENTERTAINMENT |
$151.25 |
FULL PAYMENT OF JOHN GILL OWN PIANO - LIBRARY SERVICES |
||
29113 |
12-Sep-02 |
F WEST |
$54.10 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT FOR DAY CARE CENTRES |
||
29114 |
12-Sep-02 |
LADYBIRD'S PLANT HIRE |
$85.80 |
RENTAL OF INDOOR PLANTS FOR AUGUST |
||
29115 |
12-Sep-02 |
JAMES & MICHELLE B CARTON |
$231.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 98 WALYUNGA BOULEVARD CLARKSON |
||
29116 |
12-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29117 |
12-Sep-02 |
ERICA BLUM |
$6.00 |
VOLUNTARY SERVICES |
||
29118 |
12-Sep-02 |
HIDES GROUP |
$12,086.25 |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY & FOCUS GROUP |
||
29119 |
12-Sep-02 |
CUSTOMER SERVICE COUNCIL |
$297.50 |
HALF YEAR MEMBERSHIP FEE - JOANNE CASEY |
||
29120 |
12-Sep-02 |
SHIRLEY CAMPBELL |
$50.80 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT FOR COMMUNITY BUSES |
||
29121 |
12-Sep-02 |
JAMES HOURSTON |
$5.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND 02/6078 |
||
29122 |
12-Sep-02 |
LORRICE & MICHAEL BOCK |
$35.10 |
P/N 173308 - RATE REFUND - AMALGAMATION OF PROPERTY |
||
29123 |
12-Sep-02 |
LINDSAY BOYER |
$57.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND 04/2152 |
||
29124 |
12-Sep-02 |
MATT DAHLSTROM |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE WSCC LESSER HALL 31/08/02 TO 01/09/02 |
||
29125 |
12-Sep-02 |
SHARON DOODKORTE |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE AT WARRADALE MAIN HALL 31/08/02 TO 01/09/02 |
||
29126 |
12-Sep-02 |
LINDA CASSELTON |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE AT WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE MEETING ROOM 24/08/02 |
||
29127 |
12-Sep-02 |
ANDREW MAY |
$60.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT FOR DAY CARE CENTRE |
||
29128 |
12-Sep-02 |
WAYNE DOUGLAS TURNER |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 17 HARRINGTON AVENUE, TAPPING |
||
29129 |
12-Sep-02 |
JAMES N & ANDREA E GOLDFINCH |
$265.50 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 14 WAYFORD CIRCLE, HOCKING |
||
29130 |
12-Sep-02 |
VINCENZA AMELIA MARY SIRNA |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 7 KENSINGTON WAY, PEARSALL |
||
29131 |
12-Sep-02 |
JUDITH D & RUSSELL J TURNER |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 37 ENGLEFIELD RETREAT, LANDSDALE |
||
29132 |
12-Sep-02 |
PAUL M & JULIE D DANN |
$340.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 68 GOLF LINKS DRIVE, CARRAMAR |
||
29133 |
12-Sep-02 |
HAYSAM KHEIRIDDINE JABADO |
$311.50 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 36 PRIDMORE GLEN, CLARKSON |
||
29134 |
12-Sep-02 |
ERROL ANTHONY DUNKLEY |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 24 ORARA WAY, MERRIWA |
||
29135 |
12-Sep-02 |
JACKIE DAVIDSON |
$20.00 |
DOG REGISTRATIONS REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29136 |
12-Sep-02 |
PAUL PIETROCOLA |
$57.00 |
DOG REGISTRATIONS REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29137 |
12-Sep-02 |
JAMES MEDEW |
$57.00 |
DOG REGISTRATIONS REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29138 |
12-Sep-02 |
SANDY CZIRANKO |
$20.00 |
DOG REGISTRATIONS REFUND - STERILISED |
||
29139 |
12-Sep-02 |
GLORIA BECKER |
$7.50 |
DOG REGISTRATIONS REFUND - 1/2 YEARLY |
||
29140 |
12-Sep-02 |
CARL GIANATTI |
$821.87 |
REFUND CITY OF JOON RATES PAID TO COW IN ERROR |
||
29141 |
12-Sep-02 |
K HAWKER & S ZEMKE |
$277.28 |
P/N 196788 - NO BIN CHARGE |
||
29142 |
12-Sep-02 |
MELANIE MARKS |
$193.92 |
P/N 183207 - RATE REFUND HOMESWEST SHARED EQUITY PORTION |
||
29143 |
12-Sep-02 |
P D MERRY |
$36.27 |
P/N 177038 - POOL REFUND |
||
29144 |
12-Sep-02 |
D & H SCHARTNER |
$26.31 |
P/N 167597 - 5% DISCOUNT |
||
29145 |
12-Sep-02 |
MR & MRS CHISARI |
$119.00 |
P/N 154274 - REFUSE CHARGE |
||
29146 |
12-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN COPYRIGHT COUNCIL |
$440.00 |
TRAINING COURSE - DAWN MCINTYRE AND JOANNE BREWER |
||
29147 |
12-Sep-02 |
HERITAGE OFFICER PETTY CASH |
$100.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29148 |
12-Sep-02 |
JUSINDA DYSON |
$50.00 |
SEPTEMBER 2002 DONATIONS |
||
29149 |
12-Sep-02 |
TOM QUINN |
$50.00 |
SEPTEMBER 2002 DONATIONS |
||
29150 |
12-Sep-02 |
LISA BAUM |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - JOHN MALONEY CLUB ROOMS |
||
29151 |
12-Sep-02 |
MENA MONTELEONE |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - WARRADALE COMMUNITY |
||
29152 |
12-Sep-02 |
RUSSELL BOTT & KRYSTYNA KURIATA |
$320.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 1 CASSANO BOULEVARD CLARKSON |
||
29153 |
12-Sep-02 |
JANINE KAY & ROBERT JOHN NOLAN |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY FOR 41 LIGHTHOUSE PARADE MINDARIE |
||
29154 |
12-Sep-02 |
MAYNE LOGISTICS ARMAGUARD |
$371.37 |
WAA 2 KEY SAFE COLLECTION & SAFE FEE |
||
29155 |
12-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF THEATRE SPORTS |
$43.00 |
THEATRE SPORTS MANUAL - CHICZ BIZ PROGRAMME |
||
29156 |
12-Sep-02 |
C & E M HARMER |
$29.60 |
H2328 07/07/02 - 03/08/02 WANNEROO LIBRARY PAPER DELIVERY |
||
29157 |
12-Sep-02 |
BEBA HALL |
$450.00 |
CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK PRESENTATION |
||
29158 |
12-Sep-02 |
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY SCHEME |
$131,241.68 |
ISR POLICY INSURANCE 30/06/02 TO 30/06/03 |
||
29159 |
12-Sep-02 |
PLANNING INSTITUTE AUSTRALIA |
$1,265.00 |
PLANNING OFFICERS TO ATTEND PIA CONFERENCE 7-8 NOVEMBER 2002 |
||
29160 |
12-Sep-02 |
TARVIT CONSULTING SERVICES |
$1,199.00 |
PREP OF INCUBATOR FUNDING APPLICATION |
||
29161 |
12-Sep-02 |
W A C O S S |
$88.00 |
TWO WACOSS DIRECTORIES - L GRAHAM AND H GORDON |
||
29162 |
12-Sep-02 |
AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS |
$7.00 |
PAYROL DEDUCTIONS F/ENDING 30/08/02 |
||
29163 |
12-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH |
$59.40 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29164 |
12-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION |
$77.40 |
PAYROL DEDUCTIONS F/ENDING 30/08/02 |
||
29165 |
12-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$88.60 |
P/CASH - TERRACOTTA POTS, CRAFT SUPPLIES, MILK, GROCERIES |
||
29166 |
12-Sep-02 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29167 |
12-Sep-02 |
AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND |
$807.69 |
APP NO. - A3606010501 F/ENDING 30-AUG-02 |
||
29168 |
12-Sep-02 |
CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT |
$264.50 |
FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY - AUGUST 2002 |
||
29169 |
12-Sep-02 |
FARLEY CAMPBELL |
$30.80 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT FOR COMMUNITY BUSES |
||
29170 |
12-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO MUNI FUND |
$1,279.00 |
RATES F/ENDING 30/08/02 |
||
29171 |
12-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$275.99 |
CR STEFFENS –AUGUST TRAVEL EXPENSES PAID TO RATES |
||
29172 |
12-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$7,802.20 |
RATES PAID INTO SUNDRY DEBTOR IN ERROR |
||
29173 |
12-Sep-02 |
COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$291.50 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29174 |
12-Sep-02 |
D G CONSULTING |
$2,633.40 |
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WORK |
||
29175 |
12-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29176 |
12-Sep-02 |
KERBING WEST |
$21,612.31 |
SCENIC DRIVE & NEVILLE STREET - PRAM RAMP FOOTPATHS |
||
29177 |
12-Sep-02 |
LEISURE & CULTURAL SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$100.30 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29178 |
12-Sep-02 |
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL |
$1,100.94 |
PAYROL DEDUCTIONS F/ENDING 30/08/02 |
||
29179 |
12-Sep-02 |
MUNICIPAL INS BROKING SVCS WA |
$5,940.00 |
CASUAL HIRERS LIABILITY |
||
29180 |
12-Sep-02 |
NEERABUP PRIMARY SCHOOL |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - BANKSIA MEETING ROOM 1 |
||
29181 |
12-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS |
$600.00 |
3 X HIP HOP WORKSHOPS FOR YOUTH SERVICES ACTIVITIES - HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE |
||
29182 |
12-Sep-02 |
TELSTRA CORPORATION |
$100.00 |
1 X RATEPAYERS FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29183 |
12-Sep-02 |
WESTERN POWER |
$80,538.69 |
4 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE POWER SUPPLY CHARGES |
||
29184 |
12-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO TOWNSITE COMMUNITY GROUP |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND FOR HALL HIRE - WANNEROO COMMUNITY CENTRE MAIN HALL 24 & 25/08/02 |
||
29185 |
12-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO CENTRAL NEWSAGENCY |
$148.21 |
MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS FOR MOBILE LIBRARY |
||
29186 |
12-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO LIBRARIES CENTRAL SVCS P/C |
$102.90 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29187 |
12-Sep-02 |
W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC. |
$6.60 |
POSTAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT DIRECTORIES |
||
29188 |
12-Sep-02 |
WA PAINT CITY |
$269.95 |
PAINT FOR GRAFFITI CONTROL MAINTENANCE |
||
29189 |
12-Sep-02 |
ACTION LOCK SERVICE |
$202.35 |
REPAIRS TO LOCKS |
||
29190 |
12-Sep-02 |
AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L |
$3,676.76 |
AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES AND REPAIRS AT VARIOUS COW BUILDINGS |
||
29191 |
12-Sep-02 |
B G C CONCRETE |
$153.67 |
CEMENT FOR LIDDELL STREET GIRRAWHEEN |
||
29192 |
12-Sep-02 |
BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD |
$139.01 |
CABLE THROTTLE FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29193 |
12-Sep-02 |
BATTERIES PLUS |
$400.40 |
EQUIPMENT FOR INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29194 |
12-Sep-02 |
C J D EQUIPMENT P/L |
$428.26 |
SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29195 |
12-Sep-02 |
DBS FENCING |
$1,426.70 |
FENCE REPAIRS FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS |
||
29196 |
12-Sep-02 |
DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD |
$1,876.60 |
SUPPLY COW SIGNS AND ACCESSORIES FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29197 |
12-Sep-02 |
E R S AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$326.15 |
PARTS WASHER SERVICES |
||
29198 |
12-Sep-02 |
GELDENS PTY LTD |
$88.00 |
FESA FIRE SERVICES TIES (UNIFORMS) |
||
29199 |
12-Sep-02 |
HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY (AUST) P/L |
$1,049.15 |
VEHICLE FILTER FOR STORE STOCK AND WORKSHOP |
||
29200 |
12-Sep-02 |
KD INSTRUMENTS |
$445.50 |
CALIBRATE/CERTIFY WORKSHOP EQUIPMENT |
||
29201 |
12-Sep-02 |
LINCOLNE SCOTT |
$5,948.80 |
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29202 |
12-Sep-02 |
LINK TELE- COMMUNICATIONS |
$68.82 |
USAGE SUMMARY CHARGES |
||
29203 |
12-Sep-02 |
MUSTANG PRINT & COPY |
$10.00 |
COLOUR PHOTOCOPIES OF MANAGING A SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT - OH&S |
||
29204 |
12-Sep-02 |
NORTH RIVER CARAVANS |
$206.07 |
25% OF TOTAL AWNING ROLL REPLACEMENT FOR EMERGENCY FIRE BUS |
||
29205 |
12-Sep-02 |
NATIONAL FLEET NETWORK P/L |
$440.00 |
PANEL FILTER 94 PLTS FOR VEHICLE J98019 |
||
29206 |
12-Sep-02 |
ORANGE |
$555.80 |
ACCOUNT SUMMARY ORANGE PAGING SERVICES |
||
29207 |
12-Sep-02 |
PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD |
$993.37 |
SAFETY EQUIPMENT FOR STORE STOCK |
||
29208 |
12-Sep-02 |
PRESTIGE ALARMS |
$211.20 |
REPAIRS - BANKSIA GROVE COMM CENTRE & JENOLAN WAY COMM CENTRE |
||
29209 |
12-Sep-02 |
THE PRINTING FACTORY |
$3,344.82 |
B/C GARETH DIXON BASE STOCK COW BUSINESS CARDS - BOB CRAMP CHRIS HOSKISSON GEORGE PATERSON IAIN SCALLY CHARLIE MARSHALL WASTE SERVICES BUSINESS CARD NO NAME PLANT DEFECT BOOKS - STORE STOCK PRINTING OF SWIMMING TICKETS FOR VACATIONAL SWIMMING |
||
29210 |
12-Sep-02 |
PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL |
$5,449.17 |
OUTSIDE WORKERS UNIFORM ISSUE |
||
29211 |
12-Sep-02 |
QUALCON LABORATORIES |
$445.50 |
LIMESTONE TESTING FOR TECHNICAL OPERATIONS |
||
29212 |
12-Sep-02 |
RELLIM BOOKSELLERS PTY LTD |
$123.37 |
TRANSACT-SQL PROGRAMMING - INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29213 |
12-Sep-02 |
ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS |
$97.56 |
FILLING SAND FOR VARIOUS CITY OF WANNEROO LOCATIONS |
||
29214 |
12-Sep-02 |
STANDARDS AUSTRALIA |
$50.60 |
HIDDEN GOLD - ISO9000 FOR DANIEL SIMMS |
||
29215 |
12-Sep-02 |
STOPMASTER BRAKES |
$811.80 |
RELINE BRAKE SHOES FOR VARIOUS PLANT AT DEPOT WORKSHOP |
||
29216 |
12-Sep-02 |
SUN CITY PUBLISHING |
$88.00 |
SUN CITY NEWS - AUGUST 2002 EDITION - ADVERTISING |
||
29217 |
12-Sep-02 |
SLING RIG SALES |
$35.20 |
SHACKLES FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29218 |
12-Sep-02 |
TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD |
$659.34 |
SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29219 |
12-Sep-02 |
ONESTEEL LTD |
$691.31 |
SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29220 |
12-Sep-02 |
TOTAL TORO |
$698.70 |
SPARE PARTS FOR MOWER WORKSHOP |
||
29221 |
12-Sep-02 |
WEMBLEY CEMENT INDUSTRIES |
$6,360.20 |
VARIOUS CONCRETE ITEMS FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECTS |
||
29222 |
12-Sep-02 |
WESTERN RE-SPOTTING SERVICES |
$1,963.50 |
LINEMARKING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29223 |
12-Sep-02 |
CLEAN SWEEP |
$198.00 |
SWEEPING - KINGSWAY NETBALL COURT |
||
29224 |
12-Sep-02 |
HOME CHEF |
$2,605.68 |
HOME CHEF DINNERS FOR HACC CLIENTS 06/08/02 AND 30/07/02 |
||
29225 |
12-Sep-02 |
LO-GO APPOINTMENTS |
$12,824.18 |
CONTRACT STAFF - VARIOUS |
||
29226 |
12-Sep-02 |
REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES |
$1,716.00 |
CLEANER AT WANNEROO ADMIN. AND CIVIC CENTRE – JULY 2002 |
||
29227 |
12-Sep-02 |
STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS |
$45,295.28 |
HIRE OF VARIOUS TRUCKS, LOADERS, TIPPER, BOBCAT/FORKS |
||
29228 |
12-Sep-02 |
SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD |
$2,062.50 |
PODIATRY SERVICE 29 JULY - 9 AUG 02 |
||
29229 |
12-Sep-02 |
TWIST ENGINEERING PTY LTD |
$5,285.50 |
IRRIGATION DESIGNS FOR VARIOUS PARKS |
||
29230 |
12-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29231 |
13-Sep-02 |
FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY |
$360.00 |
LODGING OF 12 RECORDS - RANGER SERVICES |
||
29232 |
17-Sep-02 |
PRINT SHED |
$173.80 |
OVERALLS AND SCREENS - YOUTH SERVICES (RALLY AUSTALIA) |
||
29233 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO AMATEUR FOOTBALL CLUB |
$100.00 |
BOND REFUND - WANNEROO SHOWGROUNDS |
||
29234 |
18-Sep-02 |
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND WANNEROO COMMUNITY CTRE KITCHEN |
||
29235 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROBERT TAYLOR |
$91.66 |
KEY HOLDER WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER - WANNEROO SHOW-GROUNDS COURTS |
||
29236 |
18-Sep-02 |
WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD |
$298.10 |
HOME CARE SERVICES FOR HACC/CACP CLIENTS |
||
29237 |
18-Sep-02 |
BRIDGELEIGH |
$1,500.00 |
DEPOSIT FOR VOLUNTEERS FUNCTION - LAUREN OATES |
||
29238 |
18-Sep-02 |
GILBERT ROSE CONSULTING P/L |
$14,460.19 |
EXTENSION OF HEPBURN/MIRRABOOKA AVENUES - CONSULTANCY PROGRESS PAYMENT TWO |
||
29239 |
18-Sep-02 |
DEWSONS MERRIWA |
$31.87 |
GROCERIES FOR THE FAMILY DAY CARE PROGRAM |
||
29240 |
18-Sep-02 |
NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF |
$125.90 |
1564-02 CITY OF WANNEROO VS. M.A LONGMORE |
||
29241 |
18-Sep-02 |
BOYNES SPRINGS |
$365.20 |
TRAMPOLINE SPRINGS FOR STREET BANNERS |
||
29242 |
18-Sep-02 |
EDMUND RICE CAMPS |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HALL |
||
29243 |
18-Sep-02 |
EVAN MARTIN |
$83.32 |
KEY HOLDER -KOONDOOLA COMMUNITY HALLS KEY HOLDER - ALEXANDER HEIGHTS KEY HOLDER - HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE KEY HOLDER - JOHN MOLONEY CLUBROOMS |
||
29244 |
18-Sep-02 |
DRIVESHAFT BALANCING SERVICES |
$1,254.00 |
REPAIR THREE DRIVESHAFTS INV 1745, 1753 - WORKSHOP MAINTENANCE |
||
29245 |
18-Sep-02 |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGERS AUSTRALIA |
$550.00 |
MEMBERSHIP FOR 2002/03 MICHAEL COLE REGISTRATION LGMA SEMINAR SERIES 2002 -S PENALUNA & J GAFF |
||
29246 |
18-Sep-02 |
LANDSDALE JUNIOR FOOTBALL CLUB |
$100.00 |
BOND REFUND - WARRADALE CHANGEROOM |
||
29247 |
18-Sep-02 |
ACELLCOMM P/L |
$510.00 |
CAR KIT FOR KYOCERA 2135 MOBILE PHONE INTO NEW PATROL VEHICLE |
||
29248 |
18-Sep-02 |
APPLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$330.73 |
APPLE COMPUTER SG12504KKYZ - RENTAL PAYMENT FOR GRAPHICS COMPUTER |
||
29249 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO SOFCROSSE/MODCROSSE CLUB |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND WCC KITCHEN |
||
29250 |
18-Sep-02 |
NEGATIVE HOLDINGS |
$3,086.44 |
REFUND - PROPERTY 173706 OVERPAYMENT |
||
29251 |
18-Sep-02 |
LEE TAN |
$41.66 |
BANKSIA GROVE ZONE KEY HOLDER KEY HOLDER – PERIDOT PARK |
||
29252 |
18-Sep-02 |
LUZIA JOHNSTONE |
$41.66 |
KEY HOLDER - CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE |
||
29253 |
18-Sep-02 |
SPECTRUM SURVEY & MAPPING PTY LTD |
$2,200.00 |
FEATURE SURVEY COCKMAN HOUSE, WANNEROO |
||
29254 |
18-Sep-02 |
JENNY GILBERT |
$100.00 |
TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER - KOONDOOLA PARK TENNIS COURT TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER MONTROSE PARK TENNIS |
||
29255 |
18-Sep-02 |
DEANNE HETHERINGTON |
$91.66 |
KEY HOLDER - GIRRAWHEEN SCOUT & GUIDE HALL KEY HOLDER - HUDSON PARK CLUBROOM TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER – HUDSON PARK COURTS |
||
29256 |
18-Sep-02 |
STEVE BARBARICH |
$41.66 |
KEY HOLDER - WARRADALE COMMUNITY HALL |
||
29257 |
18-Sep-02 |
JAMES BOOTH PHOTOGRAPHY |
$170.00 |
FESA AWARDS – PHOTOGRAPH/S |
||
29258 |
18-Sep-02 |
IAN MARTINUS |
$178.90 |
BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES - CONFERENCE EXPENSES |
||
29259 |
18-Sep-02 |
CORAL RAYNER |
$41.66 |
KEY HOLDER - PHIL RENKIN RECREATION CENTRE |
||
29260 |
18-Sep-02 |
A A T & T KIERNAN |
$31.71 |
REFUND – P/N 100332 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29261 |
18-Sep-02 |
MR M ADAMS |
$167.35 |
REFUND – P/N 177735 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29262 |
18-Sep-02 |
MR A F SUSAC |
$993.54 |
REFUND – P/N 196205 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29263 |
18-Sep-02 |
MR & MRS B GEORGIOU |
$494.46 |
REFUND – P/N 199796 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29264 |
18-Sep-02 |
MR R E REED |
$44.80 |
REFUND – P/N 159502/159260 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29265 |
18-Sep-02 |
JEFFREY SHORE |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29266 |
18-Sep-02 |
CLEM DI VIRGILIO |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29267 |
18-Sep-02 |
ANNE HODGSON |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29268 |
18-Sep-02 |
WAYNE MAIDEN |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29269 |
18-Sep-02 |
KAREN FENNER |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29270 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROBERT MILLS |
$57.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29271 |
18-Sep-02 |
SHIRLEY FOREMAN |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29272 |
18-Sep-02 |
LICIA SANSBURY |
$25.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND |
||
29273 |
18-Sep-02 |
DAVID HARBINSON |
$50.00 |
REIMBURSEMENT OF BANK FEES ASSOCIATED WITH REJECTION OF BPAY RATES TRANSACTION |
||
29274 |
18-Sep-02 |
ARENA NOMINEES PTY LTD |
$1,944.88 |
REFUND P/N 180948 - OVERPAYMENT |
||
29275 |
18-Sep-02 |
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT |
$200.00 |
PETTY CASH - BANKSIA GROVE COMMUNITY PETTY CASH – JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE |
||
29276 |
18-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP PUBLIC LIBRARY |
$25.30 |
LOST BOOK PAID FOR & RETURNED |
||
29277 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROSEMARY SPEE |
$6.60 |
LOST BOOK PAID FOR & RETURNED |
||
29278 |
18-Sep-02 |
ELSIE THOMAS |
$37.40 |
LOST BOOK PAID FOR & RETURNED |
||
29279 |
18-Sep-02 |
ALTURA CORPORATION P/L |
$641.94 |
P/N 198067 - CHARGED TWICE |
||
29280 |
18-Sep-02 |
RUPERT FRANSE |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE WARRADALE MAIN HALL |
||
29281 |
18-Sep-02 |
GREENWOOD BASKET |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE WANNEROO REC CTRE |
||
29282 |
18-Sep-02 |
BINH N TRAN & LAN T PHAM |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29283 |
18-Sep-02 |
LORRAINE & S FLORESTA |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29284 |
18-Sep-02 |
TRACEY & CARLO TASSONE |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29285 |
18-Sep-02 |
LORRAINE A DALTON |
$280.15 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29286 |
18-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL & SUSAN STOTT |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29287 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROBERT & S DELAVALE |
$314.50 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29288 |
18-Sep-02 |
HAYDEN M & LJ TANGYUK |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29289 |
18-Sep-02 |
MARIA C FERGUSON |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29290 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROBYN & SYDNEY ELKES |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29291 |
18-Sep-02 |
G ACQUAROLA & B PETERS |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29292 |
18-Sep-02 |
MARY & RAYMOND SPEERS |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29293 |
18-Sep-02 |
IRENE NELSON |
$150.00 |
HOME BASED BUSINESS NIGHT - PRIZE WINNER |
||
29294 |
18-Sep-02 |
MEAGEN N CRUMP |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29295 |
18-Sep-02 |
LISA & M FITZPATRICK |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29296 |
18-Sep-02 |
DAMON MATTHEWS & S BROMFIELD |
$236.50 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29297 |
18-Sep-02 |
B CAFAGNA & A ROBERTSON |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29298 |
18-Sep-02 |
AMANDA J BORRETT |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29299 |
18-Sep-02 |
DARREN BOWLING & TERRI BRIDGE |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29300 |
18-Sep-02 |
GIRRAWHEEN BAPTIST CHURCH |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HALL |
||
29301 |
18-Sep-02 |
LESETTE MASTERS |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND WARRADALE MAIN HALL |
||
29302 |
18-Sep-02 |
GRETHEL FONCECA |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND JOHN MOLONEY CLUBROOMS |
||
29303 |
18-Sep-02 |
DEBBIE PATRONI |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND – ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HALL |
||
29304 |
18-Sep-02 |
ANTHONY G McTAGGART |
$272.00 |
REIMBURSEMENT FOR SECURITY AND CROWD CONTROLLER LICENCES |
||
29305 |
18-Sep-02 |
AABCO OFFICE FUNITURE |
$955.00 |
WORKSTATION CHERRY/IRONSTONE - AGED DAY CARE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS |
||
29306 |
18-Sep-02 |
ARB 4X4 ACCESSORIES |
$3,942.05 |
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - RANGER SERVICES |
||
29307 |
18-Sep-02 |
WESFARMERS C S B P |
$465.85 |
POOL CHEMICALS FOR AQUAMOTION |
||
29308 |
18-Sep-02 |
NEVERFAIL |
$200.00 |
600ML CARTON -24 BOTTLE WATER FOR RANGER SERVICES |
||
29309 |
18-Sep-02 |
TORO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$193.69 |
REIMBURSEMENT INVOICE CREDITED TWICE |
||
29310 |
18-Sep-02 |
ALINTA GAS |
$101.85 |
920000100 ADJUSTMENT OF ACCOUNT 1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29311 |
18-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS ADULT DAY CARE PETTY CASH |
$54.60 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29312 |
18-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$90.85 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29313 |
18-Sep-02 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29314 |
18-Sep-02 |
B & G CHAMBERS |
$420.00 |
CATERING FOR POLICY FORUM |
||
29315 |
18-Sep-02 |
CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD |
$4,279.77 |
LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET |
||
29316 |
18-Sep-02 |
MOBILE LIBRARY PETTY CASH |
$51.35 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29317 |
18-Sep-02 |
NORMAN DENNIS |
$41.66 |
KEY HOLDER - JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE |
||
29318 |
18-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS |
$500.00 |
HIP HOP WORKSHOP - YOUTH SERVICES |
||
29319 |
18-Sep-02 |
QUALITY PRESS |
$399.50 |
STRATEGIC PLAN - PAYMENT OF GST PORTION OF INVOICE |
||
29320 |
18-Sep-02 |
TELSTRA CORPORATION |
$111.25 |
RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29321 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH |
$86.85 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29322 |
18-Sep-02 |
WESTERN POWER |
$91.30 |
RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29323 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO JUNIOR CRICKET CLUB |
$50.00 |
BOND REFUND.TEMPORARY SIGN |
||
29324 |
18-Sep-02 |
WARWICK GREENWOOD JUNIOR CRICKET CLUB INC |
$50.00 |
BOND REFUND - TEMPORARY SIGN |
||
29325 |
18-Sep-02 |
J ARRIGO |
$91.66 |
KEY HOLDER - WANNEROO SENIOR CITIZENS TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER – ELLIOTT ROAD COURTS |
||
29326 |
18-Sep-02 |
LYNNE VERGUNST |
$91.66 |
KEY HOLDER - NORTH WARD ZONE TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER – GUMBLOSSOM COURTS |
||
29327 |
18-Sep-02 |
BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS |
$9.30 |
ASSORTED BOOK PURCHASES - 2002/2003 FOR THE MOBILE LIBRARY |
||
29328 |
18-Sep-02 |
DWELLINGUP BUNKHOUSE OUTDOOR |
$250.00 |
SGIO YOUTH CHALLENGE CAMP – 6, 7 & 8 NOV 2002 AT DWELLINGUP BUNK- HOUSE CAMP (DEPOSIT TO SECURE BOOKING – HELD AS BOND) |
||
29329 |
18-Sep-02 |
EXPRESS CHEMICALS |
$913.00 |
AQUAMOTION POOL CHEMICALS |
||
29330 |
18-Sep-02 |
GOLDFIELDS CONTRACTORS WA PTY LTD |
$219,253.32 |
EXTENSION OF HEPBURN/MIRRABOOKA AVENUES - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT TWO |
||
29331 |
18-Sep-02 |
MAYDAY EARTHMOVING |
$5,471.18 |
PLANT HIRE FOR VARIOUS TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECTS |
||
29332 |
18-Sep-02 |
MCLEOD & CO |
$1,468.10 |
LEGAL EXPENSES – STANDING ORDER 2002/2003 PROSECUTION: LOT 46 (50) TRIUMPH AVENUE, WANGARA |
||
29333 |
18-Sep-02 |
TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD |
$69.45 |
C3704 MUDGUARDS J98110 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29334 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES |
$447.55 |
MILK SUPPLY FOR CITY OF WANNEROO |
||
29335 |
18-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29336 |
18-Sep-02 |
AUST INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH |
$1,894.00 |
STATE CONFERENCE 2002 MEMBERSHIP & NON MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION & PRE CONFERENCE WORKSHOP - G SPICER STATE CONFERENCE 2002 MEMBERSHIP & NON MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATIONS - T SARGANT, T DONCON, E FRENCH AND D SHIMMIN |
||
29337 |
18-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$25,347.34 |
COURIER & POSTAGE CHARGES |
||
29338 |
18-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$570.00 |
REGPOST PREPAID LAB X 6 |
||
29339 |
18-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$8,654.27 |
MAIL PREPARATION - AUGUST 2002 |
||
29340 |
18-Sep-02 |
ACROD WA DIVISION |
$16.50 |
PARKING PERMIT RENEWAL - AGED DAY CARE SERVICES |
||
29341 |
18-Sep-02 |
AMERICAN INTER UNDERWRITERS |
$7.00 |
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 13/09/02 |
||
29342 |
18-Sep-02 |
ALINTA GAS |
$11,682.50 |
GAS SUPPLY FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS 1X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29343 |
18-Sep-02 |
AUST BUSINESS TELEPHONE CO |
$1,107.70 |
ON HOOD DIAL TELEPHONE HEADSETS FOR INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29344 |
18-Sep-02 |
AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND |
$807.69 |
A3606010501 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 13/09/02 |
||
29345 |
18-Sep-02 |
BELL HEALTH |
$409.18 |
RESPITE CARE FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS |
||
29346 |
18-Sep-02 |
BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY |
$46,207.45 |
BCITF LEVY-FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST |
||
29347 |
18-Sep-02 |
COURIER AUSTRALIA |
$571.28 |
COURIER SERVICES |
||
29348 |
18-Sep-02 |
CITY OF JOONDALUP GENERAL ACCT |
$658.41 |
MOBILE PHONE CHARGES INCURRED BETWEEN JULY 2001 AND AUGUST 2002 |
||
29349 |
18-Sep-02 |
CAPE DEMOLITION |
$100.00 |
ROOF TILES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
||
29350 |
18-Sep-02 |
CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$185.10 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29351 |
18-Sep-02 |
CITY OF JOONDALUP PLANT HIRE |
$1,023.00 |
HIRE OF CHERRY PICKER |
||
29352 |
18-Sep-02 |
CABCHARGE |
$283.19 |
CABCHARGE FEES WORKSHOP |
||
29353 |
18-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C |
$1,418.80 |
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 13/09/02 RATES |
||
29354 |
18-Sep-02 |
CATHEDRAL OFFICE PRODUCTS |
$60.50 |
ONE WHITEBOARD - FINANCE |
||
29355 |
18-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$540.00 |
PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF WANNEROO ON BEHALF OF DANS-EZ STUDIO |
||
29356 |
18-Sep-02 |
CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD |
$1,811.00 |
FOOD SUPPLIED FOR VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS |
||
29357 |
18-Sep-02 |
CONTEK COMMUNICATIONS |
$192.50 |
LOWER TELSTRA NETWORK |
||
29358 |
18-Sep-02 |
DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF - MARANGAROO |
$22,942.92 |
MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE, GREEN FEE & RANGE COMMISIONS |
||
29359 |
18-Sep-02 |
DUNCAN CROSBIE PRO GOLF-CARRAMAR |
$21,684.14 |
CARRAMAR GOLF COURSE, GREEN FEE & RANGE COMMISIONS |
||
29360 |
18-Sep-02 |
D & M LAUNDRY SERVICE |
$294.53 |
LAUNDRY SERVICES |
||
29361 |
18-Sep-02 |
DEPT OF INDUSTRY & TECHNOLOGY-CAMS |
$1,781.53 |
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT REBATE PERIOD OCT 00 – JUNE 2002 |
||
29362 |
18-Sep-02 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$19.00 |
END OF QUARTER VEHICLE SEARCHES FOR JUNE 2002 |
||
29363 |
18-Sep-02 |
ELECTRIC STOVEMAN |
$88.01 |
SERVICE TWO URN BOILERS - EMERGENCY SERVICES |
||
29364 |
18-Sep-02 |
EDGEWATER COMMUNICATIONS |
$851.40 |
SERVICE CALL GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY TO PROGRAM SYSTEM SUPPLY ADDITIONAL HX308 KEYSTATIONS, SUPPLY NEW DIGITAL CORDLESS PHONE, RELOCATE REAR OFFICE KEYSTATION, INSTALLATION & PROGRAMMING, MATERIALS |
||
29365 |
18-Sep-02 |
FINANCIAL COUNSELLORS ASSOC WA |
$110.00 |
MEMBERSHIP FEE - HELEN GORDON, FINANCIAL COUNSELLOR |
||
29366 |
18-Sep-02 |
HOMECARE PURSUITS |
$7,777.68 |
RECREATIONAL AND RESPITE CARE FOR HACC AND CACP CLIENTS |
||
29367 |
18-Sep-02 |
HARVEY NORMAN |
$699.90 |
SWANN CORDLESS SECURITY CAMERA/SCREEN SYSTEM - YOUTH SERVICES (CLARKSON) |
||
29368 |
18-Sep-02 |
HELEN TUCKEY |
$150.00 |
CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK - STORYTELLING SCHOOL HOLIDAY ACTIVITIES |
||
29369 |
18-Sep-02 |
INST OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING (WA) INC |
$616.00 |
PUBLIC WORKS DIPLOMA SEMINAR - G SHAW |
||
29370 |
18-Sep-02 |
INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING |
$8,365.50 |
MAINTENANCE AT VARIOUS PARK TOILET BLOCKS |
||
29371 |
18-Sep-02 |
INTERACTIVE VIDEO SECURITY PTY LTD |
$1,289.07 |
REPAIR CAMERAS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
||
29372 |
18-Sep-02 |
JO COATES |
$150.00 |
CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK - STORYTELLING SCHOOL HOLIDAY ACTIVITIES |
||
29373 |
18-Sep-02 |
K & F CONCRETE |
$6,342.60 |
SUPPLY & LAY CONCRETE TO PATH IN PLAYGOUND GUMBLOSSOM LAY PAVERS AT GUMBLOSSOM SENIOR CITIZENS & QUINNS RECREATION CENTRE MAIN ENTRANCE REPAIR & REPAIR LIMESTONE WALL USING BLOCKS SUPPLIED X DEPOT TO GUMBLOSSOM PLAY AREA |
||
29374 |
18-Sep-02 |
KERBING WEST |
$21,927.19 |
KERBING FOR PARHAM STREET, QUINNS ROCKS KERBING FOR HESTER AVENUE & CONNOLLY DRIVE |
||
29375 |
18-Sep-02 |
KLYNE CONSULTANTS |
$1,930.50 |
CONSULTANCY FOR TAPPING WAY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION |
||
29376 |
18-Sep-02 |
M LAVAN |
$191.90 |
EMPLOYEES INDEMNITY INSURANCE FOR MRS MARIA LAVAN AND GST ADJUSTMENT |
||
29377 |
18-Sep-02 |
LIFE BE IN IT |
$97.45 |
BOOKS AND GAMES FOR ALEXANDER HEIGHTS AGED DAY CARE |
||
29378 |
18-Sep-02 |
MAYNE LOGISTICS COURIER |
$839.79 |
COURIER FEES FOR CIVIC CENTRE |
||
29379 |
18-Sep-02 |
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION-PAYROLL |
$1,143.84 |
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 13/09/02 |
||
29380 |
18-Sep-02 |
MESSAGES ON HOLD |
$157.50 |
MOH PROGRAMMING 3 MONTH RENTAL 30/06/02 -30/09/02 |
||
29381 |
18-Sep-02 |
MOVE CLOTHING & LINEN SUPPLIES |
$356.35 |
STAFF UNIFORMS - MARKETING AND GOVERNANCE |
||
29382 |
18-Sep-02 |
MASTER CRAFT PROFESSIONAL PAINTING & DECORATING |
$1,760.00 |
PAINTING AT ADDISON PARK CLUBROOMS |
||
29383 |
18-Sep-02 |
MERCURY FIRE SAFETY |
$6,165.50 |
FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSTALL/MAINTENANCE AND FIRE ALARM ATTENDANCE |
||
29384 |
18-Sep-02 |
MOBILE SHRED ONSITE |
$38.50 |
MS 240 LITRE BINS ON-SITE SHRED |
||
29385 |
18-Sep-02 |
NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS |
$44.00 |
COURIER FEES FOR CIVIC CENTRE AND DEPOT |
||
29386 |
18-Sep-02 |
OPTUS COMMUNICATIONS |
$21.52 |
EWS MOBILE PHONE ACCOUNT |
||
29387 |
18-Sep-02 |
PERTH HOME CARE |
$101.70 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS |
||
29388 |
18-Sep-02 |
PRITCHARD FRANCIS ASSOCIATES PTY LTD |
$880.00 |
WANNEROO BUS SHELTER STRUCTURAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION |
||
29389 |
18-Sep-02 |
PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL |
$1,938.29 |
AIRFARES FOR DENNIS BLAIR FOR CONFERENCE AIRFARES FOR CHARLES JOHNSON FOR CONFERENCE |
||
29390 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROYAL AUST PLANNING INSTITUTE |
$35.00 |
WESTERN PLANNER SUBSCRIPTION 2001/2002 - CLEMENT WILLIAMS |
||
29391 |
18-Sep-02 |
R B MARRIS |
$40.00 |
CBFCO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - EMERGENCY SERVICES |
||
29392 |
18-Sep-02 |
ROBYN BETT |
$450.00 |
CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK - STORYTELLING |
||
29393 |
18-Sep-02 |
SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES |
$748.00 |
REFILL MAIN BROOM - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29394 |
18-Sep-02 |
SPECTRA-PHYSICS LASERPLANE (WA) PTY LTD |
$81.40 |
4 X 02 D CELL NICAD BATTERIES FOR LASER BEAM 1285 PIPE LAYER |
||
29395 |
18-Sep-02 |
SWAN CERAMICS |
$122.60 |
WHITE GLOSS, FLEXMASTER & GROUT FOR SHELVOCK PARK TOILETS |
||
29396 |
18-Sep-02 |
TELSTRA CORPORATION |
$585.40 |
MOBILE NET SUMMARY |
||
29397 |
18-Sep-02 |
THOMSON LEGAL & REGULATORY |
$352.55 |
SUBSCRIPTION - PLANNING LAW IN AUSTRALIA TAYLOR |
||
29398 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO ELECTRIC |
$6,256.67 |
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AT VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29399 |
18-Sep-02 |
WESTSIDE CONCRETE CONTRACTORS |
$5,005.00 |
CONCRETE PATHS & RAMPS AT NEVILEE ROAD & SCENIC DRIVE CROSSOVERS AT PARNHAM STREET |
||
29400 |
18-Sep-02 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$236.00 |
STANDPIPE HIRE CHARGES |
||
29401 |
18-Sep-02 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$1,772.95 |
WATER SUPPLY FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29402 |
18-Sep-02 |
W A LOCAL GOVT SUPERANNUATION |
$322,910.75 |
SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTIONS - AUGUST 2002 |
||
29403 |
18-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29404 |
18-Sep-02 |
WESTERN POWER |
$39,066.95 |
USAGE CHARGES FOR VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29405 |
18-Sep-02 |
WINTERGREENE DRILLING |
$9,900.00 |
DEVELOP THE BORES AT GIRRAWHEEN SCOUT HALL & WILLESPIE PARK NEW BORE AT SHAMROCK RESERVE YANCHEP |
||
29406 |
18-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION |
$125.00 |
MAY AND JUNE MEETING ATTENDANCE - ECONOMIC PLANNING CONTRIBUTION |
||
29407 |
18-Sep-02 |
WESTWOOD TIMBERS |
$342.01 |
TIMBER FOR TECHNICAL AND BUILDING SERVICES |
||
29408 |
18-Sep-02 |
WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING |
$196.00 |
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUDGET & INSERTS |
||
29409 |
18-Sep-02 |
W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC. |
$13,814.96 |
2002 LOCAL GOVERNMENT WEEK REGISTRATIONS - F CVITAN, M GRIERSON, C JOHNSON AND D NEWTON FULL PAYMENT OF INVOICE #20627 – UNDER PAID BY $990.00 AUGUST 2002 MARKET FORCE ADVERTISING |
||
29410 |
19-Sep-02 |
FLEETCARE |
$1,194.96 |
LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET |
||
29411 |
20-Sep-02 |
DOROTHY NEWTON |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
29412 |
20-Sep-02 |
ALAN BLENCOWE |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
29413 |
20-Sep-02 |
FRANK CVITAN |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
29414 |
20-Sep-02 |
SAM SALPIETRO |
$1,125.00 |
MONTHLY AND MEETING ALLOWANCE |
||
29415 |
20-Sep-02 |
PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL |
$2,962.00 |
AIRFARES FOR C JOHNSON - CONFERENCE |
||
29416 |
23-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN MANUFACT WKS UNION |
$77.40 |
PAYROLL DED F/E 13/09/02 |
||
29417 |
25-Sep-02 |
FASTWAY COURIERS (WA) |
$108.90 |
A3 LOCAL DOCUMENT SATCHEL FOR LORNA GRAHAM |
||
29418 |
25-Sep-02 |
ACOOLAH HATS |
$119.90 |
KOOL AUSSIE MEN NAVY/S RED L - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29419 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUTO CONTROL DOORS |
$112.20 |
REPAIRS TO AUTOMATIC DOOR AQUAMOTION |
||
29420 |
25-Sep-02 |
ANGUS & ROBERTSON - WHITFORDS |
$281.00 |
BOOK PURCHASES FOR WANNEROO LIBRARY |
||
29421 |
25-Sep-02 |
ACTIMED AUSTRALIA |
$590.59 |
FIRST AID EQUIPMENT FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES - PODIATRY |
||
29422 |
25-Sep-02 |
ALMANS SPORTS REPAIRS |
$390.50 |
REPAIR TENNIS NETS |
||
29423 |
25-Sep-02 |
ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT |
$904.75 |
HIRE - 2 TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS, NEVILLE DRIVE |
||
29424 |
25-Sep-02 |
AIREY RYAN & HILL |
$409.20 |
DESIGN AND DOCUMENT PUMP STATION UPGRADE AT BURT STREET, QUINNS ROCK |
||
29425 |
25-Sep-02 |
ADELPHI TAILORING CO |
$756.00 |
UNIFORMS FOR RANGER SERVICES |
||
29426 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUTO DOOR SYSTEMS |
$208.94 |
ANSWER SERVICE CALL TO AUTO GATE SERVICE CALL AT CITY’S EXIT GATE |
||
29427 |
25-Sep-02 |
AGPARTS WAREHOUSE |
$186.67 |
FORTRON BREAK CLEANER - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29428 |
25-Sep-02 |
A CLASS LINEMARKING SERVICE |
$1,056.00 |
LINE MARK THE DEPOT CARRY OUT LINE MARKING AT ENTRANCE TO COUNCIL WORKSHOPS |
||
29429 |
25-Sep-02 |
AISAT INSTRUMENTS PTY LTD |
$29.86 |
MALE & FEMALE BLADE ENDS, CABLE CASING - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29430 |
25-Sep-02 |
ABACUS COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY |
$176.00 |
SHARP AR201T TONER PHOTOCOPIER -ALEXANDER HEIGHTS |
||
29431 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF THEATRE SPORTS |
$264.00 |
THEATRE SPORTS WORKSHOP - 1 X CLARKSON AND 1 X TWO ROCKS |
||
29432 |
25-Sep-02 |
ABC BIRD CONTROL |
$198.00 |
REMOVAL OF A ROOSTER FROM 21 BURNHAM WAY, GIRRAWHEEN |
||
29433 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY LTD |
$30.00 |
SEPTEMBER EVENT FOR WA COLLEGE OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGIST - KATHY CHRISTOFFELSZ, MARK TEALE AND JANELLE TOVEY |
||
29434 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUDIO VISUAL TECHNICAL SERVICES |
$209.00 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - REPAIRS TO TV AND VIDEOS |
||
29435 |
25-Sep-02 |
BOOK SHELF |
$387.50 |
BOOK PURCHASES FOR GIRRAWHEEN PUBLIC LIBRARY |
||
29436 |
25-Sep-02 |
BLUE COLLAR PEOPLE |
$6,752.36 |
PLANT OPERATOR/ STOREMAN - M DAVIS TRUCK MECHANIC – M BUTLER, K HEAD |
||
29437 |
25-Sep-02 |
BGC BLOKPAVE |
$1,043.25 |
SUPPLY AND DELIVER PAVERS FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29438 |
25-Sep-02 |
B W PLASTICS PTY LTD |
$748.00 |
SUPPLY LOBSTER BACKED FABRICATED BENDS 3 PIECE FULLY WELDED FIBREGLASS REINFORCED F & F ENDS SHORT ONES CLASS PVS AS PER QUOTE 2 X 48 DEGREES & 1 X 45 DEGREES FOR K BARLOW TECH SERVICES |
||
29439 |
25-Sep-02 |
BARNETTS (W.A.) PTY LTD |
$70.07 |
SPINDLES & LOCKS FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
||
29440 |
25-Sep-02 |
COASTAL SERVICES |
$495.00 |
REPAIRS TO GAS HEATER AT CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE TEST DISHWASHER – MAYOR’S PRIVATE KITCHEN REPAIRS AT JANOLAN WAY & GUMBLUSSOM COMMUNITY HALL |
||
29441 |
25-Sep-02 |
CROMMELINS HANDYMAN HIRE & SALES WANGARA |
$485.00 |
COMBI SP DIAMOND BLADE FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29442 |
25-Sep-02 |
CONTI'S WINES |
$510.00 |
WINES FOR ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29443 |
25-Sep-02 |
CHARLES THOMAS BOOKS |
$33.08 |
BOOK MASSAGE YOGA FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
||
29444 |
25-Sep-02 |
CHARTER PLUMBING & GAS |
$525.80 |
NEW BOARD & SENSOR TO WILSON ELECTRONIC URNS |
||
29445 |
25-Sep-02 |
CPM GROUP PTY LTD |
$2,475.00 |
COURSE - BEST PRACTICE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR B CARTER & D GREEN 2 DAY BEST PRACTICE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT COURSE - J SOBON, J DUFF, T QUINN |
||
29446 |
25-Sep-02 |
DIRECT NATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES (REMLAD) |
$428.34 |
PRINTING ROOM SUPPLIES |
||
29447 |
25-Sep-02 |
DELL COMPUTERS PTY LTD |
$184.80 |
CD-ROM DRIVES FOR INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29448 |
25-Sep-02 |
DYMOCKS WARWICK |
$38.62 |
MOVIES PURCHASED FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
||
29449 |
25-Sep-02 |
ELLENBY TREE FARMS |
$240.02 |
JACARANDA TREE IN 100 LITRE BAG FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29450 |
25-Sep-02 |
FAL FOOD SERVICES |
$736.97 |
BISCUITS, NUTS AND LOLLIES FOR ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29451 |
25-Sep-02 |
FORPARK AUSTRALIA |
$2,608.10 |
SUPPLY AND REPAIR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT |
||
29452 |
25-Sep-02 |
FINIRA PLASTIC MANUFACTURERS |
$5,014.35 |
POOUCH BAGS AND ORANGE BIN LINERS FOR WASTE SERVICES |
||
29453 |
25-Sep-02 |
FLOCON ENGINEERING PTY LTD |
$66.00 |
EHR 012 HOSE STOP FOR VEHICLE 98817 |
||
29454 |
25-Sep-02 |
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION |
$120.00 |
SEX EDUCATION WORKSHOP FOR CHICZ BIZ YANCHEP 05/8/02 |
||
29455 |
25-Sep-02 |
GREEN & GOLD HIAB SERVICES |
$577.50 |
HIRE OF CRANE TRUCK TO REMOVE PAVING NEVILLE DRIVE WANNEROO INSTALL PUMPS AT LIDDELL PARK & KINGSWAY SOCCER & ST ANDREWS |
||
29456 |
25-Sep-02 |
G J TILT TRAY & TOWING SERVICE |
$88.00 |
TOWING OF A HYUNDAI CAR REG # WN31517 |
||
29457 |
25-Sep-02 |
C & E M HARMER |
$34.00 |
NEWSPAPERS FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS |
||
29458 |
25-Sep-02 |
ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY |
$2,042.01 |
METER READINGS - PHOTOCOPIERS WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29459 |
25-Sep-02 |
INTEGRAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD |
$20.13 |
IBM SELECTRIC III 196 210 1210 RIBB FOR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE |
||
29460 |
25-Sep-02 |
JMAC INDUSTRIES |
$1,076.90 |
CLEANING RAGS - DEPOT STORE DEGREASER & COOLANT FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29461 |
25-Sep-02 |
KAB SEATING SYSTEMS |
$80.30 |
301 DAMPER KIT FOR VEHICLE 98881 |
||
29462 |
25-Sep-02 |
KIMSEED ENVIRONMENTAL PTY LTD |
$1,714.77 |
SUPPLY OF SEEDS FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29463 |
25-Sep-02 |
LYONS & PEIRCE |
$3,289.00 |
HIRE OF A CAMEL TRUCK & OPERATOR - ROSSCLARE PROM., MINDARIE |
||
29464 |
25-Sep-02 |
MEDIA ON MARS |
$33.00 |
CD OF CHIKZ BIZ GRAPHICS - COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM |
||
29465 |
25-Sep-02 |
L MILLAR & ASSOCIATES |
$1,782.00 |
CONSULTANCY ON ROAD SAFETY AUDITS FOR WANNEROO ROAD & ELLIOT/VILLANOVA |
||
29466 |
25-Sep-02 |
MCLEOD & CO |
$1,810.60 |
ANNUAL AUDIT POSSIBLE PROSECUTION: POULTRY REGULATIONS APPEAL: GARY ELLIS TREMAINE VS. CITY OF WANNEROO PROSECUTION - DOG NUISANCE : MR P M ILMENSTEIN |
||
29467 |
25-Sep-02 |
METAL ARTWORK CREATIONS |
$334.97 |
NAME BADGES FOR COW EMPLOYEES |
||
29468 |
25-Sep-02 |
MOTORLIFE |
$279.18 |
INOX SPRAY LUBRICANT FOR STORE STOCK |
||
29469 |
25-Sep-02 |
MEDIA MONITORS WA PTY LTD |
$2,594.30 |
RADIO 6PR TRANSCRIPTS |
||
29470 |
25-Sep-02 |
MPL OCC & ENV SOLUTIONS |
$902.00 |
ASBESTOS LABELLING OF BUILDINGS INSPECTION OF CHILD CENTRE EQUIPMENT |
||
29471 |
25-Sep-02 |
MICROVISUAL TECHNOLOGY |
$133.10 |
REPAIRS.HANIMEX A4OBERHEAD PROJECTOR, DISMANTLE UNIT TO TRACE & LOCATE FAULTS |
||
29472 |
25-Sep-02 |
NIGEL'S RADIO & TV SERVICE |
$33.00 |
REPAIR RADIO |
||
29473 |
25-Sep-02 |
NGIS (AUST) PTY LTD |
$8,470.00 |
ARCVIEW SOFTWARE LICENCE & ARCVIEW 3.1 -8.2 UPGRADE |
||
29474 |
25-Sep-02 |
OCCUPATIONAL SERVICES (WA) |
$8,514.00 |
CONSULTANCY 4 AND 16 JULY 2002, EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT 01/07/02 TO 30/06/03 |
||
29475 |
25-Sep-02 |
ORANGE |
$4,473.70 |
ORANGE CDMA MOBILE ACCOUNT |
||
29476 |
25-Sep-02 |
PERTH AUDIOVISUAL |
$191.05 |
WHITEBOARD HIRE FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
||
29477 |
25-Sep-02 |
P P K ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE P/L |
$3,960.00 |
DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS COX CRES PUMP STATION |
||
29478 |
25-Sep-02 |
PACIFIC ACCESS PTY LTD |
$1,013.60 |
ADVERTISING – YELLOW PAGES FOR AQUAMOTION AND GOLF COURSES |
||
29479 |
25-Sep-02 |
POPE PACKAGING |
$203.50 |
SAND BAGS FOR ENGINEERING |
||
29480 |
25-Sep-02 |
PIONEER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PTY LTD |
$2,606.89 |
DELIVERY OF ROCKBASE MATERIAL 5MM DIORITE – STORE STOCK |
||
29481 |
25-Sep-02 |
QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES |
$1,020.00 |
DEMYSTIFYING ISO 9001:2000 PERTH 6 AUG-2002 |
||
29482 |
25-Sep-02 |
RYDELL INDUSTRIAL BELTING CO |
$195.25 |
REPAIR CAN COMPACTOR BELT |
||
29483 |
25-Sep-02 |
M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD |
$999.35 |
QUINNS BEACH EMERGENCY PROTECTION WORKS |
||
29484 |
25-Sep-02 |
REXEL AUSTRALIA |
$37.62 |
PANELS FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29485 |
25-Sep-02 |
RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD |
$4,554.00 |
LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29486 |
25-Sep-02 |
SCOTTS TRIMMING SERVICE |
$396.00 |
RECOVER AND REPAIR FOAM CODE ON MOWER SEATS |
||
29487 |
25-Sep-02 |
STANDARDS AUSTRALIA |
$46.20 |
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT - JIM DUFF |
||
29488 |
25-Sep-02 |
STATE LAW PUBLISHER |
$90.39 |
STATE RECORDS ACT 2000 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ADVERTISING |
||
29489 |
25-Sep-02 |
SALMAT |
$212.30 |
KOONDOOLA REGIONAL BUSHLAND FESTIVAL 4 & 5SEP 2002 |
||
29490 |
25-Sep-02 |
SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ |
$14,798.30 |
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE.WANN BIKE PLAN |
||
29491 |
25-Sep-02 |
SPECIALISED FORCE PTY LTD |
$126.50 |
FAIRMONT CHAINSAW BAR - WORKSHOP |
||
29492 |
25-Sep-02 |
SILVER CHAIN |
$376.20 |
CARE AIDE - MON-FRI – 1/7-24/7/02 |
||
29493 |
25-Sep-02 |
SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD |
$261.51 |
VARIOUS VEHICLE SPARE PARTS FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP |
||
29494 |
25-Sep-02 |
SOUTHCOTT PTY LTD |
$930.28 |
VARIOUS VEHICLE SPARE PARTS FOR DEPOT WORKSHOP |
||
29495 |
25-Sep-02 |
SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD |
$101,374.77 |
FUEL SUPPLIES FOR CITY VEHICLES |
||
29496 |
25-Sep-02 |
STANDOUT SIGNS |
$368.50 |
SUPPLY FLAT METAL SIGNS GREEN RECYCLING FACILITY MOTIVATION DRIVE, WANGARA |
||
29497 |
25-Sep-02 |
FORCORP PTY LTD |
$1,122.00 |
STROBE LIGHT SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29498 |
25-Sep-02 |
TRUCKLINE |
$607.56 |
RELINE REAR BRAKE SHOES |
||
29499 |
25-Sep-02 |
TOTALLY WORKWEAR |
$1,881.00 |
STAFF CLOTHING - RANGERS |
||
29500 |
25-Sep-02 |
UNDERGROUND SERVICES AUSTRALIA |
$896.50 |
LOCATE SERVICES CNR HIGHCLERE & BERKLEY RD, AUGUST 2002 CALL OUT LOCATE WATER SERVICES AT COX ROAD & QUINNS ROAD, QUINNS ROCKS LOCATE SERVICE CNR HESTER AV&MARMION AV TO LUKIN DRIVE CALL OUT LOCATE SERVICE CNR HESTER AVENUE & MARMION AVENUE TO LUKIN DRIVE - CALL OUT |
||
29501 |
25-Sep-02 |
ULTRA PRINTING SERVICES |
$78.65 |
SUPPLY 300 IT HELP STICKERS |
||
29502 |
25-Sep-02 |
VALUER GENERAL’S OFFICE |
$2,030.26 |
RATING SERVICES VALUATION FEES GRV INT VALS METRO SHARED |
||
29503 |
25-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE |
$2,375.45 |
METAL FABRICATION/REPAIR SERVICES TO THE CITY OF WANNEROO |
||
29504 |
25-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO TOWING SERVICES |
$902.00 |
VEHICLE TOWING FEES FOR RANGER SERVICES |
||
29505 |
25-Sep-02 |
WORK CLOBBER |
$357.45 |
VARIOUS SAFETY CLOTHING ITEMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES |
||
29506 |
25-Sep-02 |
JCA WESTSIDE |
$852.50 |
AM/FM CLARION PM1699 RADIO /CASSETTE - FLEET MAINT. SUPPLY FIT NEW CC320 CAMERA FOR EXCHANGE CAMERA & REPAIR OLD CAMERA - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29507 |
25-Sep-02 |
LOGIUDICE PROPERTY GROUP |
$350.00 |
STRATA LEVIES - 7/10 MINDARIE DRIVE, QUINNS ROCKS |
||
29508 |
25-Sep-02 |
SUN CITY ACCESS CENTRE |
$30,307.60 |
HANDOVER OF COMMERCE & TRADE GRANT |
||
29509 |
25-Sep-02 |
SELLEYS ENGINEERING |
$51,474.50 |
1 GLASS FINE CONVEYOR & 1 CONTAINER CONVEYOR PLUS DELIVERY & INSTALLATION & MODIFY STAIRS TO SORTING PLATFORM 1 GLASS TROMMEL & DELIVERY & INSTALLATION AT THE MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY & REMOVE GRISLEY & CUT DOWN WALL |
||
29510 |
23-Sep-02 |
ALLMARK & ASSOCIATES |
$37.00 |
REPLACEMENT PADS FOR COLOR PRINTER - ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29511 |
23-Sep-02 |
ATKINS CARLYLE LTD |
$92.40 |
SAFTEY WET WEATHER TROUSERS AND COATS - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29512 |
23-Sep-02 |
ALUMAYNE PRODUCTS |
$528.00 |
REPAIR DOOR AT BURBRIDGE KINDY 12 OFF CAPS FOR BARDSLEY PLAY EQUIPMENT SHELVES FOR CABINETS AT CARRAMAR GOLF |
||
29513 |
23-Sep-02 |
AarqueANITECH |
$7,531.96 |
METER READINGS AND MAINTENACE - PHOTOCOPIERS |
||
29514 |
23-Sep-02 |
ARRB TRANSPORT RESEARCH LTD |
$3,300.00 |
CONDUCT SURVEY, ANALYSE RESULTS AND ESTABLISH THE DETERIORATION MODEL - INFRASTRUCTURE |
||
29515 |
23-Sep-02 |
ADFORM |
$261.80 |
CFM HELMET STICKERS, REFLECTIVE HELMET LABELS, MAGNETIC TAPE FOR STICKERS & RED REFLECTIVE HELMET TAPE - RANGER SERVICES |
||
29516 |
23-Sep-02 |
ADVANCED NURSERY |
$152.00 |
4 BOUGANVILLEA SHRUBS - PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29517 |
23-Sep-02 |
AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD |
$497.80 |
GAS CYLINDER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
||
29518 |
23-Sep-02 |
BOC GASES |
$49.05 |
OXYGEN MEDICAL C SIZE |
||
29519 |
23-Sep-02 |
BENARA NURSERIES |
$2,046.88 |
GREVILLEA, GILT DRAGON, GREVILLEA CRITHMIFOLIA - PLANTS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29520 |
23-Sep-02 |
BROWNBUILT METALUX INDUSTRIES |
$415.78 |
FILING CABINETS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN |
||
29521 |
23-Sep-02 |
BUNNINGS LIMITED |
$1,211.57 |
VARIOUS TOOLS, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES FOR BUILDING& FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29522 |
23-Sep-02 |
BOOMA AUTO ELECTRICS |
$82.50 |
MAKE UP AIR CON HOSE 96704 |
||
29523 |
23-Sep-02 |
BITUMEN EMULSIONS |
$2,244.00 |
SUPPLY ROAD MATERIAL FOR TECH SERVICES |
||
29524 |
23-Sep-02 |
BRING COURIERS |
$52.66 |
COURIER CHARGES WANNEROO -NEDLANDS HEALTH DEPT |
||
29525 |
23-Sep-02 |
BEAUREPAIRES |
$18,881.75 |
TYRE FITTING SERVICE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29526 |
23-Sep-02 |
BYWEST PTY LTD |
$1,668.37 |
MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29527 |
23-Sep-02 |
BUDGET PORTABLES |
$1,391.38 |
SECURITY CONTAINERS, LUNCHROOMS AND CHEMICAL TOILET HIRE FOR ONSITE WORKS |
||
29528 |
23-Sep-02 |
J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD |
$654.50 |
7 GREASE GUN CARTRIDGES - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29529 |
23-Sep-02 |
BRAVO HIRE |
$254.00 |
PLANT HIRE FOR DEPOT |
||
29530 |
23-Sep-02 |
CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA |
$684.20 |
VEHICLE BATTERIES FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29531 |
23-Sep-02 |
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS |
$9,257.84 |
ADVERTISING FOR MAY & JULY 2002 |
||
29532 |
23-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29533 |
23-Sep-02 |
COVENTRYS |
$2,564.44 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29534 |
23-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29535 |
23-Sep-02 |
COVENTRYS |
$2,803.92 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29536 |
23-Sep-02 |
CUTTING EDGES PTY LTD |
$162.26 |
2045 BOLT ON TOOTH - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29537 |
23-Sep-02 |
CONSOLIDATED BEARING COMPANY |
$116.46 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29538 |
23-Sep-02 |
COLES SUPERMARKETS AUST P/L |
$203.15 |
FOOD FOR INNOVATION SAUSAGE SIZZLE |
||
29539 |
23-Sep-02 |
CHADSON ENGINEERING PTY LTD |
$48.84 |
EMERKIT INDUSTRIAL - PLANT MAINTENANCE FOR AQUAMOTION |
||
29540 |
23-Sep-02 |
CARABOODA ROLL ON INSTANT LAWN |
$1,100.00 |
DELIVER 250 SQ METRE OF KIKUYU TURF WITH FORK LOADER TO GUMBLOSSUM COMMUNITY CENTRE PLAYGOUND, TAPPING WAY QUINNS |
||
29541 |
23-Sep-02 |
CITY BUSINESS MACHINES |
$870.80 |
PANASONIC KXFP151AL FAX - CEO'S OFFICE CANOSCAN D2400UF - LIBRARY SERVICES |
||
29542 |
23-Sep-02 |
DEPT OF CONSERVATION & LAND |
$345.26 |
ABORIGINAL PRESENTATION - C PITULEJ 11 JULY 2002 - YANCHEP LIBRARY ELECTICITY SUPPLIED GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM, YANCHEP 28/5-13/8/02 |
||
29543 |
23-Sep-02 |
DRIVE IN ELECTRICS |
$1,710.50 |
VARIOUS ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29544 |
23-Sep-02 |
DIAMOND LOCK & KEY |
$931.04 |
RE-KEYING AND KEY CUTTING SERVICES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE |
||
29545 |
23-Sep-02 |
DEMBICON AUSTRALIA |
$188.00 |
CONVEYOR CART COMPLETE - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29546 |
23-Sep-02 |
EXECUTIVE PLANT HIRE |
$3,523.85 |
HIRE OF A DRY ROLLER & MULTI ROLLER |
||
29547 |
23-Sep-02 |
EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD |
$40.00 |
HIP HOP POSTERS FOR YOUTH SERVICES |
||
29548 |
23-Sep-02 |
ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD |
$601.70 |
DISPOSAL OF RUBBLE |
||
29549 |
23-Sep-02 |
ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD |
$3,768.48 |
RETICULATION ITEMS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29550 |
23-Sep-02 |
ENVELOPE SPECIALISTS |
$1,311.72 |
WINDOW ENVELOPES - PLANNING AND DEV. |
||
29551 |
23-Sep-02 |
FRICTION CONTROL |
$236.72 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR STORES AND FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29552 |
23-Sep-02 |
FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LIMITED |
$5,266.94 |
PAYROLL/PERSONNEL PROCESSING CHARGES – P/ENDING 16/08/02 |
||
29553 |
23-Sep-02 |
GIBSONS & PATERSON W A PTY LTD |
$263.45 |
NEW YORK OYSTER/CAKE FORK, S/S COFFEE SPOON, GLASS EMBOSSED - ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29554 |
23-Sep-02 |
JR & A HERSEY |
$517.00 |
SURVEY PEGS - STORE STOCK |
||
29555 |
23-Sep-02 |
HOSEMASTERS |
$206.58 |
MAKE UP HYD HOSE - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29556 |
23-Sep-02 |
JOHNSON HARPER WA |
$329.94 |
CROWN LARGER & HAHN PREMIUM BEER FOR ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29557 |
23-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP CANVAS WORKS |
$82.50 |
REPAIR BLUE SHADE SAIL - PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29558 |
23-Sep-02 |
KOTT GUNNING |
$2,076.25 |
PROFESSIONAL CHARGES IN REFERENCE TO SAFER CITIZENS |
||
29559 |
23-Sep-02 |
KNIGHT & SONS |
$890.80 |
PAL MINCE FOR POUND 100 STAR PICKETS - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29560 |
23-Sep-02 |
KOMATSU AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$194.56 |
417-54-24280 GAS STRUTS - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29561 |
23-Sep-02 |
LULLFITZ |
$89.65 |
PLANTS FOR PARKS DEPT AND CITIZENSHIP CEREMONIES |
||
29562 |
23-Sep-02 |
MINI EXCAVATORS PTY LTD |
$4,801.50 |
PLANT HIRE FOR VARIOUS TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECTS |
||
29563 |
23-Sep-02 |
MAJOR MOTORS |
$260.58 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29564 |
23-Sep-02 |
MIRCO BROS PTY LTD |
$25.00 |
CHEMICAL MEASURING CUPS - PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29565 |
23-Sep-02 |
MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD |
$261,058.54 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR DEPOT STORE AND FLEET MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING PURCHASE OF NEW ROAD SWEEPER |
||
29566 |
23-Sep-02 |
MIDLAND BRICK COMPANY PTY LTD |
$187.55 |
BANKSIA TOP PAVERS DELIVERED TO PARHAM WAY, QUINNS ROCKS |
||
29567 |
23-Sep-02 |
MODERN TEACHING AIDS PTY LTD |
$145.80 |
TOYS FOR AQUAMOTION CRECHE |
||
29568 |
23-Sep-02 |
MEMO COMMUNICATIONS |
$2,696.98 |
SUPPLY/REPAIR RADIOS TO VARIOUS PLANT/VEHICLES FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29569 |
23-Sep-02 |
MINI PICKERS |
$616.00 |
MINIMUM HIRE 16M CHERRY PICKER KOONDOOLA PARK ERECT 16 BANNERS ON WANNEROO ROAD |
||
29570 |
23-Sep-02 |
NOVUS WINDSCREEN REPAIRS |
$270.00 |
SUPPLY & FIT WINDSCREEN – VEHICLE #96715 |
||
29571 |
23-Sep-02 |
NEWMART |
$107.02 |
GROCERIES FOR GUMBLOSSOM AGED DAY CARE |
||
29572 |
23-Sep-02 |
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY PTY LTD |
$2,002.00 |
LIFT MAINTENANCE |
||
29573 |
23-Sep-02 |
PEERLESS EMULSION WA PTY LTD |
$35.75 |
GYM CLEAN - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29574 |
23-Sep-02 |
P R AGENCIES INDUSTRIAL PTY LTD |
$2,448.08 |
CAMERAS AND FILM FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29575 |
23-Sep-02 |
PHOTOLAND |
$47.80 |
DEVELOP & PROCESS FILMS - MARKETING |
||
29576 |
23-Sep-02 |
PHOTOLAND |
$35.85 |
DEVELOP & PROCESS FILMS – TECH SERVICES |
||
29577 |
23-Sep-02 |
QUINTI & CO |
$143.00 |
150MM ZAC TRENCHING SHOVEL FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29578 |
23-Sep-02 |
QUICKCOPY AUDIO SERVICES |
$162.03 |
A5-CD SLIM PRESTIGE PRESENTATION FOLDERS - LIBRARY SERVICES |
||
29579 |
23-Sep-02 |
ROYAL LIFE SAVING SOCIETY W A |
$24.00 |
WATER WISE JUNIOR SWIM & SURVIVE AND SWIM & SURVIVE CERTIFICATES FOR AQUAMOTION |
||
29580 |
23-Sep-02 |
REPCO AUTO PARTS |
$288.37 |
BRAKE SHOES AND CLUTCH KIT FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29581 |
23-Sep-02 |
E & M J ROSHER |
$479.20 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29582 |
23-Sep-02 |
R & P ENGINEERING PTY LTD |
$3,247.20 |
ROAD PROFILING & SWEEPING FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29583 |
23-Sep-02 |
RCG PTY LTD |
$12,842.14 |
LANDFILL, CLEANFILL INCOMING, RUBBLE MIXED GOVT LANDFILL LEVY |
||
29584 |
23-Sep-02 |
SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY |
$160.05 |
FIRST AID SAFETY SHARPS CONTAINER 1.4 LTR WITH BBQ TONGS - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29585 |
23-Sep-02 |
SANDERSON ENGINEERING COMPANY |
$1,291.90 |
VARIOUS CHAINSAW SPARE PARTS FOR WORKSHOP |
||
29587 |
23-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29587 |
23-Sep-02 |
SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT |
$815,300.26 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS AND REPAIRS FOR PLANT VEHICLES AND STOCK FOR DEPOT STORE 1 IVECO ACCO F2350G/250 WITH AIR GAUGE WEIGHTING SYSTEM & 4.5KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER (NEW TRUCK) AIR GAUGE WEIGHING SYSTEM.45KG FIRE EXTINGUISHER 1 NEW IVECO ACCO F2350G/250 (TRUCK) |
||
29588 |
23-Sep-02 |
STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L |
$3,394.92 |
CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR STORES STOCK
|
||
29589 |
23-Sep-02 |
SPEEDO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$209.00 |
TRADING STOCK FOR AQUAMOTION |
||
29590 |
23-Sep-02 |
CADBURY SCHWEPPES |
$783.46 |
DRINKS FOR AQUAMOTION AND ELECTED MEMBERS |
||
29591 |
23-Sep-02 |
SCANIA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$121.00 |
REPAIR BLOWER FAN FAULT - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29592 |
23-Sep-02 |
TORO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$207.33 |
V- BELT - MOWER MAINTENANCE |
||
29593 |
23-Sep-02 |
TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS |
$10,849.81 |
PVC FITTINGS - STORE STOCK AND PARKS |
||
29594 |
23-Sep-02 |
TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS |
$969.34 |
PVC FITTINGS - STORE STOCK AND PARKS |
||
29595 |
23-Sep-02 |
TECHNICAL IRRIGATION IMPORTS |
$255.22 |
COVER ASSEMBLY FOR 200 SERIES VALVES - PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29596 |
23-Sep-02 |
TAUBMANS |
$244.20 |
PAINT FOR GRAFITTI PROGRAM |
||
29597 |
23-Sep-02 |
TOOLMART |
$32.95 |
MARKING PEN & SECURITY TORX BITS & TRI BITS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
||
29598 |
23-Sep-02 |
TALDARA |
$198.00 |
DART 8OZ FOAM CUPS FOR STAFF |
||
29599 |
23-Sep-02 |
L & T VENABLES |
$56.55 |
WELDING RODS AND ACCESSORIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29600 |
23-Sep-02 |
VINIDEX TUBEMAKERS PTY LTD |
$3,892.50 |
PRIMING FLUID PEN, SOLVENT CEMENT TYPE & CLASS 12 PVC PRESSURE PIPE - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
||
29601 |
23-Sep-02 |
WESTCARE INDUSTRIES |
$1,541.42 |
STAFF CLOTHING ISSUE |
||
29602 |
23-Sep-02 |
W A HINO SALES & SERVICE |
$668.10 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29603 |
23-Sep-02 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
VOID |
||
29604 |
23-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO HARDWARE |
$4,246.45 |
VARIOUS TOOLS, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
||
29605 |
23-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO MITSUBISHI |
$102.61 |
LAMP KIT COMBINATION - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29606 |
23-Sep-02 |
WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS |
$803.00 |
MAG BASE KIT & REFLECTIVE WITCHES HATS |
||
29607 |
23-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY |
$1,063.26 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29608 |
23-Sep-02 |
W A LIBRARY SUPPLIES |
$198.38 |
AV FOLDER A5 CD SLIMLINE CREDIT INV 47771 -STATIONERY FOR ALL LIBRARIES |
||
29609 |
23-Sep-02 |
WELLINGTON SURPLUS STORES |
$33.80 |
ECOR 1201 BELT UNLINED FOR PATROL OFFICER - UNIFORMS |
||
29610 |
23-Sep-02 |
WATTLEUP TRACTORS |
$795.60 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29611 |
23-Sep-02 |
SCATENA & ASSOCIATES |
$13,497.00 |
CARRAMAR & MARANGAROO GOLF COURSES COMPLETION |
||
29612 |
25-Sep-02 |
WA PAINT CITY |
$596.85 |
PAINT SUPPLIES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
||
29613 |
25-Sep-02 |
MAYNE LOGISTICS ARMAGUARD |
$514.18 |
WAA CASH COLLECTIONS |
||
29614 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L |
$20,042.66 |
AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES AND REPAIRS AT VARIOUS CITY BUILDINGS |
||
29615 |
25-Sep-02 |
APE SPRINGS & SUSPENSION |
$220.00 |
RESET REAR SPRINGS ISUZU - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE |
||
29616 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSSIE IT |
$104.50 |
SERVICE CANON AP1000 TYPEWRITER - GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
||
29617 |
25-Sep-02 |
ALLTECH INDUSTRIES AUSTRALIA |
$53.36 |
PAGER REPAIRS - RANGER SERVICES |
||
29618 |
25-Sep-02 |
BENARA NURSERIES |
$1,303.50 |
CASUARINA EQUISETIFLIA 5 LT - PLANTS FOR PARKS AND GARDENS |
||
29619 |
25-Sep-02 |
B G C CONCRETE |
$419.41 |
CONCRETE FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS |
||
29620 |
25-Sep-02 |
BRICKWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD |
$15,450.60 |
CREDIT INVOICE 142149 BIN WHEELS & BIN AXELS MOBILE GARBAGE CARTS FOR WASTE SERVICES |
||
29621 |
25-Sep-02 |
BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD |
$239.21 |
GASKET, THEROMSTAT, HOSE RADIATOR UPPER,V BELT - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29622 |
25-Sep-02 |
BATTERIES PLUS |
$643.26 |
SUPPLY OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FOR INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29623 |
25-Sep-02 |
CASTROL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$114.22 |
SAW CHAIN/BAR LUBE - STORE STOCK |
||
29624 |
25-Sep-02 |
CUSTOM ENGINEERING |
$702.90 |
REPAIR HYDRAULIC RAM - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29625 |
25-Sep-02 |
CAN CALC |
$30.00 |
REPAIR BP37 CANNON CALCULATOR - FINANCE |
||
29626 |
25-Sep-02 |
DBS FENCING |
$1,995.40 |
REPAIR PUSHED DOWN MESH TO ONE BAY TO TENNIS COURT FENCE REPAIR FENCE TO PLAY GROUP AREA GUMBLOSSOM PARK |
||
29627 |
25-Sep-02 |
DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD |
$220.00 |
2 STREET NAME PLATES 200MM --- HUGHIE EDWARDS DR -- STANDARD COLOURS
|
||
29628 |
25-Sep-02 |
DIAMOND LOCK & KEY |
$95.00 |
2 KEYS CUT REPAIRS AT JOHN MOLONEY CLUBROOMS |
||
29629 |
25-Sep-02 |
EASTWAY UNI-LOADER HIRE - OAKABELlA P/L |
$3,586.00 |
BMX TRACK - KOONDOOLA PARK BMX TRACK - WARRADALE PARK |
||
29630 |
25-Sep-02 |
FAL FOOD SERVICES |
$822.93 |
STAFF - COFFEE SUPPLIES |
||
29631 |
25-Sep-02 |
GEOFF'S TREE SERVICE |
$1,758.63 |
TREE PRUNING – VARIOUS PARKS |
||
29632 |
25-Sep-02 |
GLAZEWELL P/L |
$1,321.04 |
REPLACE BROKEN GLASS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS |
||
29633 |
25-Sep-02 |
HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY (AUST) P/L |
$596.54 |
VEHICLE FILTERS FOR STORE STOCK AND WORKSHOP |
||
29634 |
25-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP INDUSTRIAL HEALTH |
$66.00 |
PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL - N R ARNOLD |
||
29635 |
25-Sep-02 |
KIMBERS AUTO TRANSPORT GROUP |
$330.00 |
WN30855 – TIP TRUCK SERVICE |
||
29636 |
25-Sep-02 |
LOCAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES ANALYTICAL |
$14,622.30 |
ABS ESTIMATED POPULATION |
||
29637 |
25-Sep-02 |
LELY WEST VERMEER |
$346.50 |
BELT - 98067 |
||
29638 |
25-Sep-02 |
MEY EQUIPMENT |
$38.94 |
4" WASHERS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29639 |
25-Sep-02 |
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL |
$50,809.67 |
TAMALA PARK WASTE - GENERAL, GREEN, DOMESTIC, BULK AND SMALL ANIMALS |
||
29640 |
25-Sep-02 |
MIKE GEARY SIGNS |
$1,942.05 |
COW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS AT BANKSIA GROVE INSTALL TO DEVELOPMENT SIGNS FOR CARSALES YARD, CLARKSON TO SUPPLY 1800X1200 WELCOME TO WANNEROO SIGN INC GRAFFITI COATING SUPPLY VARIOUS WORKSHOP SIGNS |
||
29641 |
25-Sep-02 |
NORTHERN DISTRICTS PEST CONTROL |
$533.50 |
GENERAL PEST TREATMENT FOR RODENTS AT BUCKINGHAM HOUSE TERMITE INSPECTION AT BUCKINGHAM HOUSE, COCKMAN HOUSE AND PERRY’S PADDOCK |
||
29642 |
25-Sep-02 |
PETER WOOD PTY LTD |
$1,883.20 |
REPLACE PINE BOLLARDS AT NEVILLE & SCENIC DRIVE & POST & RAIL FENCE AROUND SUMP BASIN AT SCENIC DRIVE REPAIR & REPLACE SUPERSIX FENCE AT KAIBER AVENUE & HACKNEY WAY, YANCHEP |
||
29643 |
25-Sep-02 |
PROTECTOR SAFETY PTY LTD |
$2,915.02 |
SAFETY ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK AND RANGER SERVICES |
||
29644 |
25-Sep-02 |
PRESTIGE ALARMS |
$1,488.75 |
RE-PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING OF ALARM SYSTEMS |
||
29645 |
25-Sep-02 |
THE PRINTING FACTORY |
$786.15 |
BUSINESS CARDS FOR – BRETT CARTER DEBBIE SKROZA SALLY MACE SAMANTHA QUACH G WHYTE TRACY THOMAS
MECHANICS TIME SHEETS |
||
29646 |
25-Sep-02 |
PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL |
$215.83 |
OUTSIDE STAFF UNIFORMS |
||
29647 |
25-Sep-02 |
TYCO MOTION & CONTROL |
$62.70 |
24V DC COIL AND DELIVERY - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29648 |
25-Sep-02 |
QUALCON LABORATORIES |
$110.00 |
QUINNS ROCKS GRADING (WASHED) - ST ANTHONY'S PARADE |
||
29649 |
25-Sep-02 |
ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS |
$236.03 |
DELIVERY OF SAND |
||
29650 |
25-Sep-02 |
STOPMASTER BRAKES |
$676.50 |
RELINE REAR BRAKE SHOES PLANT # 96719, 96708, 96704 AND 96712 |
||
29651 |
25-Sep-02 |
SOILAND PTY LTD |
$9,225.98 |
MULCHING AT BADGERUP |
||
29652 |
25-Sep-02 |
ONESTEEL LTD |
$202.00 |
100MM X 10MM FLAT BAR - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
||
29653 |
25-Sep-02 |
TOTAL TORO |
$3,561.10 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR MOWER WORKSHOP |
||
29654 |
25-Sep-02 |
VIBRA INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION AUST |
$84.70 |
CLEANING OF AIR FILTERS - DEPOT STORE |
||
29655 |
25-Sep-02 |
WEMBLEY CEMENT INDUSTRIES |
$2,354.22 |
DELIVERY OF CONCRETE PRODUCTS TO QUINNS ROCKS AND CLARKSON |
||
29656 |
25-Sep-02 |
W A LIMESTONE CO |
$2,475.52 |
LIMESTONE DELIVERED FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES |
||
29657 |
25-Sep-02 |
ALINE BRICK PAVING |
$2,838.00 |
PAVING TO TRAFFIC ISLANDS NEVILLE DRIVE, WANNEROO |
||
29658 |
25-Sep-02 |
CLEAN SWEEP |
$1,584.00 |
ROAD SWEEPER HIRE FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29659 |
25-Sep-02 |
CORETEL COMMUNICATION PTY LTD |
$946.00 |
DOWNLOAD JULY 2002 - INTERNET ACCESS |
||
29660 |
25-Sep-02 |
GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA |
$574.71 |
GRAFITTI REMOVAL FROM VARIOUS PARKS WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29661 |
25-Sep-02 |
HOME CHEF |
$2,645.16 |
HOME CHEF DINNERS FOR HACC CLIENTS |
||
29662 |
25-Sep-02 |
LO-GO APPOINTMENTS |
$6,318.56 |
CONTRACT STAFF - VARIOUS |
||
29663 |
25-Sep-02 |
LOVEGROVE TURF SERVICES PTY LTD |
$8,948.99 |
BELHAVEN PARK REPAIRS AND MATERIALS |
||
29664 |
25-Sep-02 |
REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES |
$31,304.69 |
CLEANING SERVICES FOR THE CITY |
||
29665 |
25-Sep-02 |
STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS |
$18,667.55 |
HIRE OF VARIOUS TRUCKS, LOADERS, TIPPER, BOBCAT/FORKS |
||
29666 |
25-Sep-02 |
SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD |
$1,787.50 |
PODIATRY SERVICES |
||
29667 |
25-Sep-02 |
TURBOMASTER PUMPS |
$7,604.30 |
SERVICE PUMP AT WILLESPIE PARK SERVICE PUMP AT GIRRAWHEEN SCOUT HALL SERVICE PUMP AT KINGSWAY SOCCER |
||
29668 |
25-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO PLUMBING |
$1,188.18 |
PLUMBING MAINTENANCE REQUIRED AT VARIOUS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY |
||
29669 |
25-Sep-02 |
JANE COFFEY & ASSOCIATES |
$616.00 |
POSITION DESCRIPTION EVALUATIONS |
||
29670 |
25-Sep-02 |
WEST COAST COLLEGE OF TAFE |
$550.00 |
DONATIONS FOR AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29671 |
25-Sep-02 |
NORTHERN DISTRICTS CYCLE CLUB |
$500.00 |
AUGUST 2002 DONATIONS |
||
29672 |
25-Sep-02 |
PRESTON HELICOPTER SERVICES P/L |
$3,173.50 |
HELICOPTER FOR MIDGE CONTROL OPERATIONS |
||
29673 |
25-Sep-02 |
VOLUNTEERING WA |
$95.00 |
RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP FEES - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
||
29674 |
25-Sep-02 |
BGC TRANSPORT |
$149.61 |
SUPPLY OF 75MM LIMESTONE FOR HESTER AVENUE, CLARKSON |
||
29675 |
25-Sep-02 |
SHARP FINANCE |
$444.09 |
AR205 DIGITAL COPIER RENTAL - AQUAMOTION |
||
29676 |
25-Sep-02 |
AQUA ATTACK |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - FUNCTION CANCELLED |
||
29677 |
25-Sep-02 |
QUINNS DISTRICT AMATEUR FOOTBALL CLUB |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - GUMBLOSSOM SPORTS HALL |
||
29678 |
25-Sep-02 |
BRANCHES EVERYWHERE |
$159.50 |
TREE PRUNING - RIDGEWOOD |
||
29679 |
25-Sep-02 |
DEWSONS MERRIWA |
$39.52 |
FOOD FOR CLARKSON YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM |
||
29680 |
25-Sep-02 |
FESA |
$83,461.00 |
SECOND QUARTER CONTRIBUTION |
||
29681 |
25-Sep-02 |
STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA |
$4,504.50 |
LIBRARY BOOKS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES |
||
29682 |
25-Sep-02 |
MIKE THORP-BUILDER |
$34,461.90 |
PAYMENT # 5 WANNEROO SPORTS & SOCIAL CLUB CONTRACTOR |
||
29683 |
25-Sep-02 |
K MART JOONDALUP |
$397.43 |
CD'S, DVD'S & BOOKS PURCHASED FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
||
29684 |
25-Sep-02 |
SUNCITY NEWSAGENCY |
$30.06 |
NEWSPAPER - YANCHEP/ TWO ROCKS LIBRARY |
||
29685 |
25-Sep-02 |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGERS AUSTRALIA |
$213.00 |
BUSINESS LUNCH 27SEPT 02 C JOHNSON REGISTRATION LGMA - S BRESNEHAN |
||
29686 |
25-Sep-02 |
NGALA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE |
$162.00 |
3VIDEO PACKAGE-‘SLEEP LIKE A BABY, AND SO TO SLEEP, NOW IN A BED’ FOR FAMILY DAY CARE SERVICES |
||
29687 |
25-Sep-02 |
CONCEPT MEDIA |
$344.85 |
MUSEUMS FEATURE - ADVERTISING |
||
29688 |
25-Sep-02 |
FINANCIAL COUNSELLORS ASSOCIATION OF WA |
$310.00 |
FCAWA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION - HELEN GORDON |
||
29689 |
25-Sep-02 |
CUSTOM VIDEO |
$86.24 |
COPY OF 8MM FILM TO VIDEO - LIBRARY SERVICES |
||
29690 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN COPYRIGHT COUNCIL |
$38.00 |
BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARIES & COPYRIGHT FOR WANNEROO CIVIC RECEPTION |
||
29691 |
25-Sep-02 |
SANDRA & S SIMUNOV |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29692 |
25-Sep-02 |
ANDREW M SEBASTIAN |
$186.55 |
P/N 194627 – RATE REFUND |
||
29693 |
25-Sep-02 |
JESSICA JORDAN |
$50.00 |
DONATION - AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29694 |
25-Sep-02 |
BEVERLEY A FITZGIBBON |
$192.78 |
P/N 161521 - RATE REFUND |
||
29695 |
25-Sep-02 |
MELISSA MAY |
$278.04 |
P/N 125933 - RATES OVERPAID |
||
29696 |
25-Sep-02 |
BRIAN JUDD |
$172.80 |
P/N 100178 - RATE REFUND |
||
29697 |
25-Sep-02 |
NEERABUP PRIMARY SCHOOL P & C |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND - HALL HIRE |
||
29698 |
25-Sep-02 |
PAUL A & RACHEL M WRAFTER |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29699 |
25-Sep-02 |
JAN JOHANNES VAN DEN BERG |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29700 |
25-Sep-02 |
SAMANTHA & WAYNE PEACOCK |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29701 |
25-Sep-02 |
NEVYLLE LEYSON HURRING |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29702 |
25-Sep-02 |
MAURIZIO LOMMA |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29703 |
25-Sep-02 |
FREDERICK ROBERT PASTOR |
$345.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
||
29704 |
25-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO AEROMODELLERS INC |
$500.00 |
COMMUNITY FUNDING |
||
29705 |
25-Sep-02 |
DAVEY REAL ESTATE |
$200.00 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29706 |
25-Sep-02 |
AWESOME ARTS AUSTRALIA |
$1,650.00 |
2002 SMARTER THAN SMOKING TABLEAUX PROJECT - AWESOME ARTS PROJECT PRODUCTION COSTS |
||
29707 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSDANCE |
$40.00 |
AUSDANCE COMMUNITY AWARENESS DAY |
||
29708 |
25-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN PERSONAL COMPUTER |
$79.00 |
MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL - INFORMATION SERVICES |
||
29709 |
25-Sep-02 |
THE TOTAL KNEAD |
$200.00 |
REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE 1/56 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE, WANGARA |
||
29710 |
25-Sep-02 |
A R & G MARTYN |
$72.40 |
P/N 112446 – RATES REFUND |
||
29711 |
25-Sep-02 |
GILLIAN WRIGHT |
$544.60 |
P/N 163442 - RATES REFUND PAID TWICE |
||
29712 |
25-Sep-02 |
CAMERON MULCAHY |
$50.00 |
DONATION - SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29713 |
25-Sep-02 |
ANDREW RUSH |
$100.00 |
DONATION - SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29714 |
25-Sep-02 |
HANNAH EGAN |
$50.00 |
DONATION - SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29715 |
25-Sep-02 |
C & E M HARMER |
$21.80 |
H0056 04/08/02 - 31/08/02 OFFICE OF CEO PAPER SUPPLY |
||
29716 |
25-Sep-02 |
MIRCO BROS PTY LTD |
$1,780.00 |
REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE 2048 WANNEROO ROAD, NEERABUP |
||
29717 |
25-Sep-02 |
NATION WISE PRODUCTS PTY LTD |
$340.00 |
PREPARE YOUR OWN STATUTORY DECLARATION |
||
29718 |
25-Sep-02 |
PLANNING INSTITUTE AUSTRALIA |
$790.00 |
PIA CONFERENCE FOR DAVID WOO & CLEMENT WILLIAMS |
||
29719 |
25-Sep-02 |
WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS |
$44.00 |
SERVICE FIRE EQUIPMENT 19/06/02 |
||
29720 |
25-Sep-02 |
AQUAMOTION OFFICE PETTY CASH |
$104.60 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29721 |
25-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE PETTY CASH |
$86.20 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29722 |
25-Sep-02 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$77.85 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29723 |
25-Sep-02 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29724 |
25-Sep-02 |
APC STORAGE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD |
$319.00 |
MODIFY EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO ALLOW ACCESS TO A/CONDITIONING MANHOLE |
||
29725 |
25-Sep-02 |
BANKWEST CONVEYANCING |
$448.00 |
P/N 199127 - PAID TWICE |
||
29726 |
25-Sep-02 |
COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$235.20 |
PETTTY CASH, CONSUMABLES, CRAFT ITEMS, BATTERIES.PARKING, MORNING TEA |
||
29727 |
25-Sep-02 |
EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT |
$58,538.61 |
FLEET HIRE FOR SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29728 |
25-Sep-02 |
GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PETTY CASH |
$258.30 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29729 |
25-Sep-02 |
GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM P/CASH |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29730 |
25-Sep-02 |
GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$4,297.85 |
RESTORE GRANULATED WETTING AGENT - PARKS MAINTENANCE |
||
29731 |
25-Sep-02 |
HAINSWORTH CENTRE CRECHE |
$250.00 |
HAINSWORTH CRECHE SUBSIDY FOR 01/07/02 TO 30/09/02 |
||
29732 |
25-Sep-02 |
JOONDALUP DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH COMMITTEE |
$300.00 |
DONATION - AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
29733 |
25-Sep-02 |
MICHAEL PSANOUDAKIS |
$500.00 |
HIP HOP WORKSHOP AT GUMBLOSSOM HALL |
||
29734 |
25-Sep-02 |
QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH |
$129.65 |
PETTY CASH |
||
29735 |
25-Sep-02 |
TELSTRA CORPORATION |
$77.30 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
||
29736 |
25-Sep-02 |
WANNEROO SOFTBALL CLUB |
$50.00 |
BOND REFUND OF A TEMPORARY SIGN |
||
29737 |
25-Sep-02 |
BENNETT BROOK CATCHMENT GROUP |
$715.00 |
BUSHLAND NEWLETTER CONT. - DONATIONS |
||
29738 |
25-Sep-02 |
BENNETT BROOK CATCHMENT GROUP |
$840.02 |
FRIENDS OF KOONDOOLA BUSHLAND - DONATIONS |
||
29739 |
27-Sep-02 |
BADGERUP TIP CASH FLOAT |
$640.00 |
REPLACEMENT CASH FLOAT - ORIGINAL STOLEN |
||
29740 |
27-Sep-02 |
DINOSAUR JIM'S |
$250.00 |
FAMILY DAY CARE PLAY SESSION |
||
29741 |
27-Sep-02 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$239.78 |
PAYROLL
|
||
50000434 |
02-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$6,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
50000435 |
02-Sep-02 |
TERRY LOFTUS |
$437.40 |
TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE |
||
50000436 |
05-Sep-02 |
MELANIE BROWNE |
$98.37 |
IN HOME CARE SALARY |
||
50000437 |
05-Sep-02 |
SHARON KABLE |
$291.25 |
IN HOME CARE SALARY |
||
50000438 |
05-Sep-02 |
WG & FE STOCKS |
$209.95 |
IN HOME CARE SALARY |
||
50000439 |
05-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$5,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
50000440 |
09-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$1,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
50000441 |
09-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS |
$167,347.80 |
REF: 642959811651070 F/ENDING 30/08/2002 |
||
50000442 |
10-Sep-02 |
ALAN POORE |
$1,749.40 |
RESIGNATION PAY OUT |
||
50000443 |
18-Sep-02 |
SHARON KABLE |
$422.57 |
IN HOME CARE SALARY |
||
50000444 |
18-Sep-02 |
WG & FE STOCKS |
$56.43 |
IN HOME CARE SALARY |
||
50000445 |
18-Sep-02 |
JON STEVENS |
$1,021.17 |
TIMESHEET NOT PROCESSED |
||
50000446 |
18-Sep-02 |
TONY DURMANICH |
$997.97 |
NORMAL HOURS NOT PROCESSED |
||
50000447 |
18-Sep-02 |
KEY HYDRAULICS |
$598.95 |
ENGINEERING REPAIRS AT MRF |
||
50000448 |
18-Sep-02 |
NICK DEL BORRELLO |
$4,067.80 |
FLEET MAINTENANCE WORKS |
||
50000449 |
20-Sep-02 |
IAN GOODENOUGH |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000450 |
20-Sep-02 |
MAUREEN GRIERSON |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000451 |
20-Sep-02 |
JUDITH HUGHES |
$978.95 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE, CHILDCARE & TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR JULY 2002 |
||
50000452 |
20-Sep-02 |
JON KELLY |
$6,000.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000453 |
20-Sep-02 |
TERRY LOFTUS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000454 |
20-Sep-02 |
GLYNIS MONKS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000455 |
20-Sep-02 |
LOUISE MCNAMARA |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000456 |
20-Sep-02 |
LYNN O'GRADY |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000457 |
20-Sep-02 |
RUDI STEFFENS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000458 |
20-Sep-02 |
JOHN STEWART |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000459 |
20-Sep-02 |
BRETT TREBY |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
||
50000460 |
23-Sep-02 |
GEORGE MOYLAN |
$870.91 |
WRONG ACCOUNT NUMBER GIVEN - NORMAL PAY |
||
50000461 |
23-Sep-02 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS
|
$164,344.80 |
REFERENCE: 642959811651070 P/E 13/08/2002 |
||
50000462 |
23-Sep-02 |
BRETT TREBY |
$445.00 |
TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR JULY & AUGUST 2002 |
||
50000463 |
27-Sep-02 |
TERRY LOFTUS |
$529.82 |
TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 2002 |
||
50000464 |
27-Sep-02 |
NICK DEL BORRELLO |
$2,033.00 |
LABOUR & MATERIALS WORK ORDER 97003 W/O 54897 |
||
|
|
|
$15,800,477.06 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
50000434 |
02-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$6,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
50000439 |
05-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$5,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
50000440 |
09-Sep-02 |
BSCL - ACF GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
$1,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN GROVE PORTFOLIO ON-LINE |
||
|
|
TOTAL |
$12,000,000.00 |
RECOUPED SEPARATELY FROM ADVANCE ACCOUNT RECOUP |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
LESS CANCELLED CHEQUES |
|
|
||||
27333 |
28-Jun-02 |
TARVIT CONSULTING SERVICES |
-$1,199.00 |
|
||
28785 |
21-Aug-02 |
WESFARMERS DALGETY |
-$465.85 |
|
||
|
|
Sub Total |
-$1,664.85 |
|
||
TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNT RECOUP FOR SEPTEMBER 2002 |
$3,798,812.21 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
City of Wanneroo Municipal Account |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cheque No. |
Date |
Paid To |
Amount |
Details |
||
182 |
20-Sep-02 |
DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT |
$1,662,679.00 |
RECOUP CHEQUE NO: 28999 - 29415 |
||
|
|
|
|
EFT DOC: 50000434 - 50000459 |
||
183 |
01-Oct-02 |
DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT |
$2,136,133.21 |
RECOUP CHEQUE NO: 29416 - 29741 |
||
|
|
|
|
EFT DOC: 50000460 - 50000464 |
||
|
|
Sub Total |
$3,798,812.21 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Others |
|
|
|
||
181A |
19-Sep-02 |
COMMONWEALTH BANK |
$4,288.16 |
CBA MERCHANT FEES |
||
|
|
|
$428.81 |
GST ON MERCHANT FEES |
||
|
|
|
$636.37 |
GLF MAINT. FEE |
||
|
|
|
$63.63 |
GST ON GLF MAINT. |
||
|
|
|
$30.00 |
STOP PAYMENT FEE |
||
|
|
|
$107.00 |
CBA EFTPOS FEES |
||
|
|
|
$10.70 |
GST ON EFTPOS FEES |
||
|
|
|
$1,000,000.00 |
INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$25,303.04 |
FDC SALARY |
||
|
|
|
$509,603.98 |
WANNEROO SALARY |
||
|
|
|
$5,490.51 |
DEDUCTIONS |
||
|
|
|
$800,000.00 |
INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$350,000.00 |
INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$650,000.00 |
INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$515,854.16 |
WANNEROO SALARY |
||
|
|
|
$ 5,700.76 |
DEDUCTIONS |
||
|
|
Sub Total |
$3,867,517.12 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
181B |
20-Sep-02 |
COMMONWEALTH BANK |
$2.50 |
SALARY RETURN FEE |
||
|
|
|
$4,373.40 |
BANK FEES |
||
|
|
|
$650,000.00 |
CBA INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$390,000.00 |
CBA INVESTMENT |
||
|
|
|
$25,199.70 |
FDC SALARY |
||
|
|
Sub Total |
$1,069,575.60 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL ACCOUNT FOR SEPTEMBER 2002 |
$4,937,092.72 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
CITY OF WANNEROO |
||||||
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME CELL 3 EAST WANNEROO DEVELOPMENT AREA |
||||||
000020 |
13-Sep-02 |
DUNDEBAR ROAD UPGRADE |
$5,566.28 |
INVOICE 1001576 |
||
Total Town Planning Schemes Bank Account |
$5,566.28 |
|
||||
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S13/0001V01
File Name: BBFinancial Report for the Month Ended 31 August 2002.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 18 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 18 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Manager Finance
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To note the monthly financial report for the month ended 31 August 2002.
Background
Regulation 34(1)(a) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a financial report to be presented to Council on a monthly basis.
Detail
The financial report for the period ended 31 August 2002 has been completed and is attached. (Attachment 1 refers).
The report comprises an Operating Statement by Program and Nature and a Cash Flow Statement for the period ended 31 August 2002, plus a Statement of Financial Position as at 31 August 2002.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The report is for the second month of the new financial year. The City’s Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2002 are being audited at present and may be subject to change. Any variations will be noted in a subsequent Monthly Financial Report to Council.
Statutory Compliance
The monthly financial report for the month ended 31 August 2002 complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulation 34(1)(a) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Goal 4 Corporate Management and Development – Committed to proper management of our financial resources.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the monthly financial report for the month ended 31 August 2002.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDED 31 AUGUST 2002
![]() |
![]() |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: PA6/0005V01
File Name: CAMarangaroo Family Centre Playground Area.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by Audrey Binnie Date 31 October 2002
Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by A Binnie Date 18 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by A Binnie Date 18 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Author: John Paton
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider seeking approval from DOLA to excise a small portion of the adjacent John Moloney Reserve to facilitate an extension to the play area at the Marangaroo Family Centre.
Background
Lot 825 Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo is held in ‘fee simple’ by the City of Wanneroo and was originally transferred from the former Town and Country Building Society as a condition of subdivision imposed by the State Planning Commission. In November 1988, the then City of Wanneroo agreed to lease Lot 825 to the Department for Community Development at a nominal rental of $1.00 for the establishment of a family centre. The building, known as the Marangaroo Family Centre, was constructed by the Department and a 21-year lease entered into with the Minister for Community Development in March 1991.
As a result of a fire, the Family Centre building was demolished in 1997 and subsequently reconstructed by the Department in 1998, essentially in the same position. The lease was not amended at that time, as there was still a further fourteen (14) years to run on the current Term.
Recently, the Department for Community Development approached the City to request an extension of their leased area. Their request was for an additional 5m to the rear and 2m to the side of the play area, to facilitate an expansion to their children’s play ground at the rear of the family centre. This request prompted an investigation to compare the existing fence location to the property boundary. As a result, it was identified that the play area has already encroached onto the adjoining John Moloney Reserve by approximately 190m2.
On researching this matter, it would appear that this situation has existed since the centre was established by the Department prior to 1991. In correspondence from the Town Clerk to the Director General for Community Development dated 12 December 1988, it was stated:
“The City proposes developing the adjacent recreation reserve more or less according to the attached draft concept plan for Highclere Park and you will note that a car park will encroach into the south-western part of Lot 825. To compensate for this, additional land adjacent to the south-eastern boundary of Lot 825 will be included in the lease area for playgrounds.”
The subsequent approved Development Application plans for the Family Centre show the fence alignment for the play area being constructed beyond the boundary of Lot 825 and consequently occupying approximately 190m2 of the adjacent Reserve.
Whilst it is apparent that this was done with the knowledge and approval of the City, the lease was not drafted to reflect this position.
Detail
The lease for the Marangaroo Family Centre provides for:-
Lessee Minister for Community Development
The Premises Swan Location 1315, Lot Number 825 in Diagram 15037
Certificate of Title Volume 1694 Folio 466 (2000m2)
The Term Twenty One Years
The Annual Rent One Dollar
In return for the ‘quiet enjoyment’ of the Premises, the Lease requires the Lessee to be responsible for the maintenance to the building, pay all outgoings levied on the property and at the expiration of the Lease, to yield up the premises in “good and substantial repair”.
To the rear and side of the Family Centre is the John Moloney Park, which is located on Reserve 39479 (see Attachment 1), vested in the City of Wanneroo for the purposes of “Public Recreation”. The Reserve was created as a condition of subdivision under Section 20A of the Town Planning and Development Act and as such, Power to Lease cannot be granted over this reserve.
The request from the Department for Community Development to increase their play area raises three issues:
1. determining whether the current situation can be endorsed;
2. determining whether the request for an extension can be supported; and
3. considering the nature of the land transactions that are available to the City to resolve the situation.
Endorsement of Current Use
It is considered that endorsement could be provided to the ongoing use of a small portion of the Reserve (approximately 190m2) by the Marangaroo Family Centre based on:-
· The area of the Reserve directly behind the Family Centre is not actively used and is in fact separated from the balance of the Reserve by a dissecting pathway (see Attachment 2 - Aerial Photo).
· The wedge shaped section of land incorporated into the play area has not extended the yard on the northern side, thereby having no impact on neighbouring properties.
· The current arrangement appears to have been in place since the original building was constructed prior to 1991.
· It would appear that the previous City of Wanneroo intended to formalise the arrangement in the Lease document, however this did not occur.
Further Extension to the Play Area
The request from the Department for Community Development is for an extension to the play area of 5m to the rear and 2 metres to the side. At an on-site meeting with representatives of the Marangaroo Family Centre, it was confirmed that they wish the side boundary fence to follow an alignment beside the existing pathway, with the rear fence relocated back approximately 3 metres.
The site inspection identified that there is a Water Authority manhole cover in the reserve, near the north eastern boundary of Lot 825 (see Attachment 2). In view of this, if the rear fence were to be relocated, then it would need to be angled out from the existing corner point so that there was approximately 3 metres clearance behind their existing shed. This arrangement would suit the Marangaroo Family Centre.
As with the issues identified in supporting the current use, the area proposed for extension is still within the segregated portion of the Reserve and therefore not likely to impact on any existing users or active use of the reserve. On this basis, support for the extension could be justifiable.
Land Transaction
The portions of land in question are part of a Section 20A Reserve. The Department of Land Administration (DOLA) has guidelines for the administration of Section 20A “Public Recreation” Reserves, which seek to preserve the public’s rights to enjoy recreation on such land, through measures such as excluding leasing powers from vesting orders given over these reserves. Under certain circumstances however the guidelines recognise that flexibility may need to be exercised to achieve practical needs.
Generally, this flexibility is achieved through the application of a lease or licence. The following provisions in the Guidelines are relevant:
· “As power to lease cannot be given over public recreation reserves, small excisions may be agreed which would provide reserved sites complementary to the use of the reserve. These would be vested in the local government with power to lease. Such sites may primarily be used for club buildings needing to be adjacent to large playing fields, but may not be provided for uses of a general nature not needing such a relationship.
· Councils have the power under S272 of the Local Government Act to license the use of reserves under their control. The licence must not bestow exclusive occupation of any part of the reserve and the licence’s purpose must be conducive to the reserve’s purpose, particularly where a “Public Recreation Reserve” is involved.”
In addition, under special circumstances, consideration may even be given to the sale of Section 20A Reserves.
Given the nature of the request from the Department for Community Development, DOLA were consulted on the opportunities for the Minister to issue a new Management (Vesting) Order for a section of the reserve, with the power to lease granted to the Council. In their response, DOLA stated:
“It is suggested that the area required for the play area be excised from Reserve 39479 and amalgamated with the Council owned Lot 825 subject of course to compliance with the section 20A guidelines.”
In a subsequent letter from DOLA dated 3 September 2002, it is advised:-
“Valuation has been received from the Valuer General’s Office and DOLA is prepared to amalgamate this portion of Reserve 39479 into the adjoining Lot 825 held in CT 1694/466 by the City of Wanneroo subject to:
- Payment of $500.00 + $50.00 GST;
- Accepting costs associated with the Form 1A process, estimated at $750.00;
- Accepting survey costs;
- Compliance with the section 20A guidelines.
Upon receipt of Council’s firm commitment on the above conditions, further procedures may be undertaken.”
Consultation
The DOLA Guidelines for Administration of Section 20A “Public Recreation” Reserves provides that where a variation to the designated purpose of a 20A Reserve is being proposed:
“a Council or other proponent must signpost the affected reserve to indicate the intended change, advertise in the local newspaper and, in appropriate cases, canvass nearby landholders by mail in order to demonstrate to the Minister the level of ratepayer support.”
It is considered that this process will provide an appropriate level of community consultation to confirm support for the proposal.
Comment
The DOLA Guidelines for the Administration of Section 20A Reserves identifies that there is a close association between Section 20A recreation land and community facilities, and occasionally there may be justification for diversion of parts of such land to child care centres and community uses.
Whilst the land comprising the Marangaroo Family Centre is held in fee simple by the City of Wanneroo, there would be an expectation that these facilities are retained and continue to be used for the purpose for which it was taken. Accordingly, there are no financial advantages to the City to amalgamate the land or possibility of recovering any costs that may be incurred.
As the Department for Community Development hold the lease for a further nine years and it is their tenants, the Marangaroo Family Centre that will experience the benefit, it is considered appropriate that they should meet the cost of the amalgamation. Formal acceptance of this principal has been received from the Department in their letter dated 18 October 2002.
As the excision of the small area will have no impact on the John Moloney Reserve and on the basis that the amalgamation can be affected at no cost to the City of Wanneroo, then it is considered that the request could be supported, not only to correct the existing situation, but also to provide the additional area required.
Statutory Compliance
If subsequently approved by DOLA, the amalgamation will be undertaken in compliance with all Statutory requirements.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There will be no financial impact on the City of Wanneroo, as the Department for Community Development have agreed to meet the amalgamation costs that would be imposed by DOLA in the event that the amalgamation was approved. In addition, the recommendation seeks to recoup City of Wanneroo costs as a condition of approval.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the request from the Department for Community Development for the extension to the playground area at the Marangaroo Family Centre located at Lot 825 Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo, subject to:-
a) the excision of a portion of Reserve 39479 and amalgamation into the adjoining Lot 825 Highclere Boulevard, Marangaroo being approved by the Department of Land Administration; and
b) the Department for Community Development meeting all associated costs, including excision expenses, costs associated with Section 20A compliance, City of Wanneroo processing fees (estimated at $1,000) and fencing/relocation costs.
2. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to undertake the required public notification process in accordance with Section 8.2 of the DOLA Guidelines for the Administration of Section 20A “Public Recreation” Reserves.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: 01075
File Name: AADisability Services Plan Review.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Mark Teale
Meeting Date: 05/11/02
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the undertaking of a review of the City’s Disability Services Plan, as outlined in Community Development’s strategic plan.
Background
The City has a statutory requirement to have in place a Disability Services Plan.
Under the Disability Services Act (1993) all public authorities, including State Government departments and local governments must prepare and implement Disability Service Plans or DSPs.
DSPs set out ways that agencies will make their services and facilities accessible to people with disabilities. Some examples of access improvements include:
1. accessible toilets to existing facilities;
2. building lower service counters;
3. installing teletypewriter (TTY) machines and automatic doors;
4. supplying information in alternative formats such as Braille, large type, or on audio-tape; and
5. disability awareness training for staff.
The Disability Services Commission is responsible for monitoring the development and implementation of DSPs.
The City’s current plan expired in 2001 and thus the Disability Services Plan requires review.
This report aims to describe the proposed process for the review of the plan.
Detail
The proposed process for the review of the Disability Services Plan is outlined below:
1. Present proposed community consultation strategy to the City’s Community Consultation Panel, to obtain endorsement of the strategies;
2. Report to Council, outlining process and seeking Council endorsement;
3. Review progress against existing document;
4. Formulate Reference Group and internal Working Party;
5. Report to Council seeking endorsement of community representatives on Reference Group;
6. Undertake Consultation process;
7. Produce draft document for public comment; and
8. Present final document to Council for consideration.
The first strategy involved in this review (indicated at number 3 above) will be to assess what progress the City has made against the current plan. It is expected that this process will take approximately 4 weeks. The City will then be in a position where it understands the progress that has been made against the current plan, and what barriers have now been resolved, and which remain to be overcome. This will form a base document for community consultation.
It is proposed to form two committees to oversee the consultation process, an internal working committee and an external Reference Group that will provide final recommendations to Council.
The Reference Group is proposed to comprise of the following:
· Mayor;
· Two Elected Representatives;
· Two consumer representatives (people with a disability);
· One representative from the Disability Services Commission; and
· Director, Community Development.
It is proposed that the terms of reference for this Group be as follows:
Name: |
Disability Services Plan Review Reference Group |
Aim: |
To provide comment and feedback in an advisory capacity on the review of the City’s Disability Services Plan |
Areas of Responsibility: |
1. To provide input to guide the community consultation process associated with the identification of key aspects of the review. 2. To comment on any new document prepared as the Disability Services Plan. 3. To provide recommendations to Council on the results of the review. |
Deputations:
|
The Reference Group may invite any persons or organisations to attend any meetings to discuss issues of interest |
Membership:
|
· Mayor · Two Elected Representatives · Two consumer representatives (people with a disability) · One representative from the Disability Services Commission · Director, Community Development |
Operating Procedure:
|
· Meetings to be arranged (with at least two weeks prior notification) by an officer from the Community Development Directorate · Meetings to be chaired by a person elected by the Reference Group at the first official meeting of the group as per clause 5.12(1) of the Local Government Act · A quorum will be a simple majority · A date for the first meeting of the Reference Group to be set within four weeks of endorsement of the Reference Group and associated Terms of Reference. · Any recommendations of the Reference Group requiring a Council decision will be presented for consideration in an official report to Council. · The Reference Group to conclude when a formal proposal or concept and report on findings is presented to Council |
Minutes
|
· Minutes are to be taken at each meeting and will be forwarded to all members and elected representatives within seven days of the meeting date. · Minutes will also be made available to members of the public on request. |
Delegated Authority |
Nil |
The internal Working Party is proposed to include some or all of the following:
· 2 Representatives from Planning and Development;
· 3 Representatives from Technical Services;
· 1 Representative from Corporate Resources;
· 1 Representative from Strategic and Executive Services;
· 1 Representative from Marketing;
· 1 Representative from Customer Service;
· 1 Representative from Leisure and Libraries;
· 1 Representative from Youth Services;
· 1 Representative from Aged and Disability Services; and
· Director, Community Development or Manager, Community Services.
The final make up of this internal working party will depend on whether it is able to be functional given its size. Its primary role will be to provide information and advice to the Reference Group.
Consultation
Once the initial review is complete it is proposed to embark upon community consultation.
The Community Consultation Panel has approved the proposed process.
The consultation strategy will take place in four parts.
Strategy 1
The first strategy involves identifying disability related groups who are in the City of Wanneroo, or regularly utilise City of Wanneroo facilities, programs or services. It is proposed that Officers would visit these groups at their place of activity, thereby bringing the consultation to the community, rather than asking the community to come to the consultation.
The idea is to “open the floor” for discussion. Rather than having a preformatted document for the groups to complete, they will be asked to identify the barriers they come across in their day to day lives. This will assist in overcoming any lack of knowledge that exists as to the services Council is involved in. The Council can then consider those issues relevant to the City, and forward other areas of concern to the relevant authorities.
Strategy 2
It is proposed to make contact with the Disability Services Commission (DSC) to request information on people with a disability and their carers living within the City of Wanneroo. A number of these people would then be selected to take part in two focus groups, to be run by Administration staff on a similar basis to the above.
Strategy 3
It is proposed that feedback forms (broad in focus, as with the above) be provided in key locations such as the New Civic Centre, Community Centres and Libraries. This is to allow people who do not have a disability, or who do not attend local groups or are known by the DSC, to have their input.
Strategy 4
The combination of the above strategies will allow the City to produce a draft document. It is proposed that this document then be put out for public comment, for a period of 60 days. This will allow “fine tuning” to the document, and ensure the community is in agreement with the frameworks outlined.
Timeframe
It is intended to present a final report to Council in early May 2003.
Comment
The development of a Disability Services Plan is a statutory requirement for Council, but also an opportunity to make progress towards achieving goals laid out in the City’s strategic plan.
Statutory Compliance
Under the Disability Services Act (1993) all public authorities, including State Government departments and local governments must prepare and implement Disability Service Plans.
Strategic Implications
The review of the Disability Services Plan is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan in the following areas:
2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – past and present;
2.4 Support safe and secure communities;
2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity;
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community;
2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities; and
4.3 Establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The financial costs associated with this review will be borne within existing budgets. Outcomes of the review may result in budget requests for consideration in the 2003/2004 budget process.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the review of the City’s Disability Services Plan, as outlined in this report;
2. ENDORSES the establishment of an Disability Services Plan Review Reference Group with terms of reference as follows:
Name: |
Disability Services Plan Review Reference Group |
Aim: |
To provide comment and feedback in an advisory capacity on the review of the City’s Disability Services Plan |
Areas of Responsibility: |
1. To provide input to guide the community consultation process associated with the identification of key aspects of the review. 2. To comment on any new document prepared as the Disability Services Plan. 3. To provide recommendations to Council on the results of the review. |
Deputations:
|
The Reference Group may invite any persons or organisations to attend any meetings to discuss issues of interest |
Membership:
|
· Mayor · Two Elected Representatives · Two consumer representatives (people with a disability) · One representative from the Disability Services Commission · Director, Community Development |
Operating Procedure:
|
· Meetings to be arranged (with at least two weeks prior notification) by an officer from the Community Development Directorate · Meetings to be chaired by a person elected by the Reference Group at the first official meeting of the group as per clause 5.12(1) of the Local Government Act · A quorum will be a simple majority · A date for the first meeting of the Reference Group to be set within four weeks of endorsement of the Reference Group and associated Terms of Reference · Any recommendations of the Reference Group requiring a Council decision will be presented for consideration in an official report to Council · The Reference Group to conclude when a formal proposal or concept and report on findings is presented to Council |
Minutes
|
Minutes are to be taken at each meeting and will be forwarded to all members and elected representatives within seven days of the meeting date. Minutes will also be made available to members of the public on request. |
Delegated Authority |
Nil |
3. APPOINTS by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following membership to the Disability Services Plan Review Reference Group:
· Mayor;
· Two Elected Members, Cr ________________; Cr_________________;
· One representative from the Disability Services Commission;
· Director Community Development or nominated representative; and
4. NOTES that a report to Council will be prepared seeking endorsement of the two community representatives nominated to the Reference Group.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PR27/0001V01
File Name: BAAppointment ot the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by simon kot Date 18 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Simon Kot
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the appointment of three community representatives to the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group.
Background
At its Ordinary Council Meeting on 24 September 2002 Council endorsed the establishment of the Gumblossom Masterplan Reference Group comprising;
· Mayor of the City of Wanneroo
· Coastal Ward Councillors
· Director, Technical Services or their nominated representative
· Director, Community Development or their nominated representative
· Director, Planning and Development or their nominated representative
· Three representatives of existing user groups, sought through a public nomination process
· A representative from the Conservation Advisory Committee who has local knowledge of the site.
The three user group representatives were to be appointed by Council once nominations had closed.
On the 27 September 2002 the City wrote to all existing user groups of facilities and ovals located within Gumblossom Reserve seeking 2 representatives of each user group to attend a Gumblossom Reserve Focus Group meeting and seeking three nominations for membership to the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group.
The Focus Group meeting was held on 14 October 2002 at the Gumblossom Community Centre. Representatives of twelve community organisations attended.
Detail
Five community representatives nominated from the existing user groups at Gumblossom Reserve. Nominations were received from;
· Brian Wright – Quinns Rocks Senior Citizens Group
· Steve Hallam – Joondalup Junior Soccer Club
· James Eley – Quinns Taekwondo Club
· Renata Zelinova – Quinns Rocks Environmental Group
· Winfred Vogel – Quinns Rocks Sports Club
Each nominee made a brief presentation to the Focus Group participants introducing themselves, advising which group they represented and how they could best represent the interests of the community in the development of the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan.
The Focus Group conducted a secret ballot and voted to nominate Mr Brian Wright, Mr Steve Hallam and Mr James Eley as the community’s representatives to the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group.
Council Administration supports the nomination of the three representatives to the Gumblossom Reserve Masterplan Reference Group. Each representative offers experience in use of the different areas contained within Gumblossom reserve and possesses a sound understanding of the issues pertaining to community use of the facilities.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the appointment of Brian Wright, Steve Hallam and James Eley as Community Representatives to the Gumblossom reserve Masterplan Reference Group.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PR19/002V01
File Name: BAJohn Moloney Community Facility Lease Agreement Working Group.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 17 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Yvette Peterson Date 15 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Facilities Coordinator
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the membership for the John Moloney Community Facility – Lease Agreement Working Group.
Background
The John Moloney Community Facility has recently benefited from a $294 000 refurbishment programme and is now a modern community asset.
The City received a joint approach from primary users of the facility to explore the possibility of entering into a formal lease agreement.
Council approved on 3 September 2002 the establishment of a John Moloney Community Facility Lease Agreement Working Group.
Detail
The Working group’s main aim is to oversee the development of a joint lease proposal between primary users of the facility and the City.
Additionally the group will be required to take in to account the possibility of designating John Moloney Park as a Softball/Baseball/Cricket specific ground. The Jaguars Softball Club has applied for State Government funding (Community Sport and Recreation Facilities Fund) in the 2003/04 funding round, for Australian Standard Softball Lighting to the Western Reserve. The estimated project cost is $150 000 with the Jaguars responsible for the ongoing operational costs. It is envisaged that the lights will have a sub metre attached to the building.
The following have nominated their interest in becoming a member of the Working Party;
Laurie Hills and Mal Brown – Greenwood Giant Baseball Club
Grant Woods and Nathan Gilder – West Coast Cricket Club
Toni and Mitchell Sideris – Jaguars Softball Club
Two representatives to be sought from other user groups of the facility - There are currently no other regular user groups of this facility
Two Community Representatives to be officially sought through a public nomination process -
There were no responses from advertisements in the Wanneroo Times
Director Community Development or nominated representative - Geof Whyte – Manager Leisure and Library Services
Manager Contracts and Property - John Paton
Consultation
The principal users as detailed above were sent letters inviting them to nominate two representatives from their club. An advertisement was inserted in the Wanneroo Times seeking two community representatives. Briefing Notes and memos were sent to internal City of Wanneroo Representatives.
Comment
It is important to note that the membership listed above were the only people that nominated for this Working Party.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Council’s commitment to include the community in the planning, development and management of facilities and services is aligned with the general strategic direction of supporting healthy communities.
Policy Implications
The consultation on this matter is in accordance with the City’s Draft Community Consultation Policy.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY ENDORSES the following membership to the John Moloney Community Facility Lease Agreement Working Group;
· Two Representatives to be nominated from each of the principal sporting clubs connected with the facility:-
§ Laurie Hills and Mal Brown – Greenwood Giant Baseball Club
§ Grant Woods and Nathan Gilder – West Coast Cricket Club
§ Toni and Mitchell Sideris – Jaguars Softball Club
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PA7/003VO1
File Name: BANEW CHARGE FOR VOCATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMES AT THE OLD CIVIC CENTRE
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 17 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Yvette Peterson Date 16 October 2002WANNEROO.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Yvette Peterson
Meeting Date: 5/11/02
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a new charge for educational and vocational training organisations at the Old Civic Centre in Wanneroo.
Background
Since the removal of Council staff from the first floor of the old Civic Centre there has been limited use of this facility. The facility is currently being reviewed in the Townsite Master Plan. Until a direction for the use of this facility has been determined, Council administration would like to make this venue available to organisations wishing to conduct educational and vocational training programmes on a short-term basis.
The facility is unable to cater for casual hirers due to management and operational issues. It is however available for short term users on a sole use basis.
Detail
Currently the Schedule of Fees and Charges include fees charged on an hourly basis for the;
· Function Room, and
· Arts Centre (wooden floor board area)
These fees are not affordable for an organisation that would like to hire the Old Civic Centre on a weekly basis. Jobs West has recently approached the City to hire half of the facility for educational and vocational training on a weekly basis for approximately 7 weeks. Jobs West is a community based ‘not for profit’ vocational education and training agency offering a diverse range of employment and training services. The purpose of this project is to place unemployed people into training and employment. The courses specialise in Retail and Warehousing. The fee payable as a “regular community group” would be $18.55 per hour or $5194 for the period of hire. Having regard for the community service nature of the applicant, it is considered a fee of $200 per week would be more appropriate.
Both Jobs West and TAFE have expressed their interest in using the Old Civic Centre next year for educational and vocational training programmes.
The $200 per week fee would cover the use of the Office, Function Room, Function Room Kitchen and shared use of toilets. An additional $200 per week would cover the use of the Arts Centre, Kitchen, Meeting room and shared use of toilets.
Jobs West have also requested a waiver of fees for the first 2 weeks to assist with the “move in costs” to their organisation. Should the new fee be adopted this would total $400.
Comment
Council administration believe that the $200 per week fee will recover operational costs for this building and would encourage the use of the Old Civic Centre whilst its use and direction are under review.
Statutory Compliance
Section 6.16 of the Local Government Act (1995) details that “fees and charges can be amended from time to time during the financial year under an absolute majority”.
Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act (1995) notes that “if a local government wishes to impose any fees or charges under this Subdivision after the annual budget has been adopted it must, before introducing fees or charges, give local public notice”.
Strategic Implications
Council’s objective to maximise the equitable access and usage of community facilities and services is aligned with the general strategic direction of supporting healthy communities.
Council’s commitment to the objects of the Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy (supporting a diverse and vibrant City) is aligned with the general strategic direction supporting healthy communities.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Approval of a waiver for Jobs West amounts to $400 to be taken from the elected members donations account.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:-
1. ADDS to its Schedule of Fees and Charges the following fee for vocational and educational training organisations at the Old Wanneroo Civic Centre on Civic Drive in Wanneroo:
· $200 per week for the use of the Office, Function Room and Function Room Kitchen and shared use of toilets.
· $200 per week for the use of the Arts Centre, Kitchen and meeting room and shared use of toilets.
2. APPROVES a waiver of fees in the amount of $400 from account 51 05 05 052 4402 0001 (Governance – Donations) for Jobs West, which will support their use of the Old Civic Centre for Educational and vocational training commencing 21 October 2002 until 3 November 2002.
3. APPROVE the requirement for an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times, to notify the public of the additional fees effective Monday 21 October 2002.
4. APPROVES of the waiver of fees for the period 21 October – 8 December 2002. This amount being the difference between the current rate of $18.55 per hour for a 7 week period totalling $5194 minus the proposed rate of $200 per week for a 7 week period totalling $1400.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: P34/0254V01
File Name: CAApplication to Keep More Than Two Dogs 124 Casuarina Way Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Kelly Edmonds
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider an application for an exemption to Council’s Local Law made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs at 124 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Law 1999 stipulates:
“A person shall not keep or permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a) 2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age or;
b) 6 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the premises are situated within a rural are or comprise a lot in a special rural area having an area of 4 hectares or more;
unless the premises is licensed as an approved kennel establishment or has been granted an exemption pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 and have planning approval under the town planning scheme.”
Detail
The following application has been made under the Dog Act 1976 and is submitted for consideration:
Address of Applicant
|
Description of Dogs
|
124 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo
|
male tan Staffordshire Bull Terrier cross female black Silky Terrier/Poodle cross male gold Retriever |
A Council Ranger has inspected the property to ensure that the means exist on the premises at which the dogs will ordinarily be kept for effectively confining the dogs within the premises. The Ranger observed the following:
|
Height |
Type |
Location |
Gates |
1.8 metres |
steel gate – metal bars |
eastern side of property |
Fences |
Rear |
Left Side |
Right Side |
Ringlock wire fencing surrounding the entire property |
1.5 metres |
1.5 metres |
1.5 metres |
Refer Attachment 1 – Photographs of the property gate and fencing.
The property is zoned special rural and is 1.4464 hectares in size.
Consultation
It has been the practice where an application is received by the City to keep more than two dogs, residents immediately adjoining the applicant’s property in question, have been consulted by letter to ascertain if they have any objections.
Number of residents consulted: one resident consulted
Number of objections received: nil
Comment
In considering the application for exemption the following two options are available:
a) Council may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 subject to conditions;
b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.
A check of Council’s records reveal that no previous complaints have been lodged with Council’s Ranger Services in relation to the dogs at the premises. The inspecting Ranger has identified that the property is suitable to keep more than two dogs. Given that no previous complaints have been received and the Ranger has endorsed the application for approval, it is recommended that an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Law 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Statutory Compliance
The application for exemption to Council’s Local Law made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976, has been detailed in this report.
Strategic Implications
2. Healthy Communities
“Foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure”
Goal 2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
Goal 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. GRANTS an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep three dogs at 124 Casuarina Way, Wanneroo subject to the specified conditions:
a) If any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no replacement is to be obtained;
b) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum;
c) This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered reasonable.
2. RESERVES THE RIGHT to vary or revoke, at any future date, the exemption given to the applicant should any relevant conditions be contravened.
3. ADVISE the adjoining neighbours of this decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S37/0001V01
File Name: DAHeritage Report Untitled as at 14 10 02.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 15 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by philippa rogers Date 14 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Philippa Rogers
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the inclusion of the former Yanchep Lime Company’s lime kilns, off Emerald Drive Carabooda, in the City of Wanneroo’s Municipal Heritage Inventory.
Background
A Municipal Inventory is a list of places and structures, which in the opinion of the local council, are, or may become, of cultural heritage significance.
Local Governments are required under section 45 of the Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990 to prepare such as list. The City of Wanneroo’s Municipal Inventory was prepared in 1994 and is currently being reviewed.
The Yanchep Lime Company established the lime kilns in Carabooda in the 1930s.
The kilns were among a number of sites considered during the preparation of the 1994 Municipal Inventory. They were allocated the reference numbers 40 and 41, however, they were not evaluated at that time as it was reported that ‘access was not available’ and were not included in the adopted Inventory.
In 1998 subdivision plans were prepared for the area and the land where the kilns were located was identified for public open space, to be vested in the City of Wanneroo.
In 1998 a Conservation Plan for the kilns was prepared which identified the cultural heritage significance of the area to the City of Wanneroo. The Conservation Plan recommended the area be submitted to the Heritage Council of Western Australia for possible inclusion in the State Register of Heritage Places.
In 2000 J. Mackay produced an honours thesis, ‘Conservation Plan for Traditional Lime-burning in Wanneroo’ which identified the Yanchep Lime Kiln site as one of four sites that she considered to be of exceptional significance.
Detail
On 14 June 2002 the former Yanchep Lime Company Kilns site in Emerald Drive, Carabooda was vested in the City of Wanneroo for public recreation and drainage (Reserve No. 46726, Location 14435).
The vesting of the Kilns site in the City of Wanneroo makes it an appropriate time to consider the inclusion of these kilns in the City’s Municipal Inventory.
The research that has been undertaken has revealed the kilns are of exceptional significance to the cultural history of the City of Wanneroo.
· It is the only known lime-burning site in Western Australia that has the remains of an associated workers settlement in addition to a pair of 1930s kilns;
· It is a tangible reminder of the Wanneroo lime burning industry;
· It has the potential to add to our current understanding of technical aspects relating to lime-burning process, domestic patterns of habitation at the kiln sites in WA, and the lifestyles of southern European migrants in Australia from the depression until the late 1950s; and
· The partially built kiln on the site has scientific value in relation to what it demonstrates in regard to the process of construction of this type of kiln.
Consultation
The inclusion of the Kilns in the City’s Municipal Heritage Inventory was discussed at the meeting of Council’s Heritage Services Advisory Committee on 11 October 2002. The recommendation of that meeting was that the former Yanchep Lime Company Kilns site in Emerald Drive, Carabooda be added to the City of Wanneroo’s Municipal Heritage Inventory.
Comment
The inclusion of the kilns in the Municipal Heritage Inventory will demonstrate the City’s commitment to the identification and protection of places of heritage significance in the City of Wanneroo.
Inclusion will also assist with the process of seeking conservation grant, as such grants are generally not available to places not listed on a Municipal Heritage Inventory or the State Heritage Register.
It appears that the only reason for its non-inclusion in the 1994 list was the lack of access to the site and research into the site. Since this time, research has confirmed the heritage significance of the site. Additional information of this nature would normally lead to a recommendation as part of the formal Municipal Inventory Review process. However there are special circumstances whereby the listing of the place on the Municipal Inventory will ensure that it is eligible for heritage funding and hence this request for a single addition to the City's Municipal Inventory.
Statutory Compliance
Under Section 45 of the Heritage Act of Western Australia, Local Governments are required to prepare a Municipal Inventory of heritage places and to review its Municipal Inventory every four years. The original inventory was compiled in 1994 and the first review will occur in this financial year.
Strategic Implications
This recommendation is consistent with the strategic plan objective ‘to conserve our heritage for future generations’.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There are no direct financial implications in listing the site in the Municipal Inventory. Such a listing will assist the City in seeking grants to assist in the conservation of the structures. In this financial year funds are included in the budget for interpretative signage at the site and in future years it could be anticipated funds will be requested to further develop and conserve the site.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council AMENDS the City of Wanneroo’s Municipal Inventory to include the former Yanchep Lime Company Kilns site in Emerald Drive, Carabooda, which is vested in the City of Wanneroo for public recreation and drainage (Reserve No. 46726, Location 14435), due to its cultural heritage significance under Section 45(2) of the Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S/0033V01
File Name: DAIntroduction of a new charge for Library Services.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 17 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Ian Stone Date 17 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Ian Stone
Meeting Date: 5/11/2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a new charge for the Library Service.
Background
The provision of a charged laminating service to the community is a service provided by many libraries. This service was provided by the former City of Wanneroo using equipment located at the Joondalup Library.
Detail
A laminator has been purchased for the Girrawheen Library and it is proposed that the lamination of items is a service that can be provided to the Wanneroo community. The 2002-2003 schedule of fees and charges does not list laminating, so the cost for this service needs to be added to the schedule.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
This service will help residents seeking lamination of standard A4 and A3 size documents.
Statutory Compliance
Section 6.16 of the Local Government Act (1995) details that “fees and charges can be amended from time to time during the financial year under an absolute majority”.
Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act (1995) notes that “if a local government wishes to impose any fees or charges under this Subdivision after the annual budget has been adopted it must, before introducing fees or charges, give local public notice”.
Strategic Implications
This service supports the strategic objective of providing community focused services and lifestyle opportunities.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As this is a new service it is not possible at this stage to quantify the additional revenue to the City.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AMENDS by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the 2002/2003 Schedule of Fees and Charges to include laminating charges of:
§ Small Pouch - $1.10 (including GST)
§ A4 pouch - $2.20 (including GST)
§ A3 pouch – $3.30 (including GST)
effective from 1 December, 2002
2. APPROVES an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times to notify the public of the additional fees.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S/0078V01
File Name: EAOctober 2002 Donations Waivers of Fees and Charges and Sponsorships Approved Under Delegated Authority.doc This line
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tracey Martell
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To note donations, waivers of fees and charges and sponsorship applications considered and determined by the Chief Executive Officer in accordance with the provisions of the Donations, Waiver of Fees and Charges and Sponsorship Policy.
Background
At its meeting on 2 July 2002, Council resolved to adopt a Donations, Waiver of Fees and Charges and Sponsorship Policy.
This policy delegates the consideration and determination of requests for donations, sponsorships and the waiver of fees and charges under the value of $500.00 to the Chief Executive Officer.
A report is consequently prepared noting delegated decisions in this area for each Council meeting.
Detail
During October, the City received 5 applications for donations, sponsorship and the waiver of fees and charges under $500.00
Applications were received from:
West Coast Cricket Club |
Safer WA Two Rocks/Yanchep |
Park Home Owners Association of Western Australia |
Wanneroo Softball Club |
Stuart Walker – Marangaroo |
WA Department of Health |
Sun City Access Centre |
Consultation
Nil
Comment
After assessment in accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in the Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy, determinations were made as listed in the recommendations of this report.
A complete list of original applications and assessments of each application against the Policy is available in the Councillors Reading Room for further information.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations, waivers and sponsorship are aligned with the City’s strategic goal of developing and supporting Healthy Communities, as follows:
2. Healthy Communities
Foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure
Goal 2.5: Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
Goal 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
The financial implications of this round of requests has resulted in an expenditure in the Donations – Elected Members account (51 05 05 052 4402 0001) of $1735.50, which has been included in the Donations Report also being considered by Council at this meeting.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of requests received by the City in October 2002 for donations, sponsorships and the wavier of fees and charges, which are as follows:
Donation and Waiver Applications
Organisation |
Event/Activity |
Decision |
West Coast Cricket Club |
Day/night cricket match to be held at John Maloney Reserve in January 2003 |
APPROVE $500.00 conditional upon the Club providing insurance and lighting information for assessment by Administration and the City being recognised as a major sponsor of the event |
Safer WA Two Rocks/Yanchep |
Waiver of Fees – use of Phil Renkin Recreation Centre for workshop for local businesses – armed hold up prevention |
APPROVE $60.00 |
Park Home Owners Association of Western Australia |
Waiver of fees – use of Council Chambers and provision of tea and coffee for meeting of park owners which discussed the activities of the Association and their plans for the future |
APPROVE $400.00 subject to appropriate City recognition |
Wanneroo Softball Club |
Wavier of Fees – use of Kingsway Facilities leased to other sporting groups (Hockey and Cricket Associations) by junior teams throughout the 2002 season. Waiver previously endorsed by Council on 4 September 2001 |
APPROVE $432.00
|
WA Department of Health
|
Waiver of Fees – use of Banksia Room for Strategic Planning Sessions on 21 and 22 November 2002 |
APPROVE: $200.00 (50% reduction in fees, conditional upon City staff being included in the sessions and the City being recognised officially)
|
Sun City Access Centre |
Waiver of Fees – use of Phil Renkin Recreation Centre for Community Workshop on 30 October 2002 |
APPROVE $93.50 |
Total |
6 applicants |
$1685.50 |
Sponsorship Applications
Organisation |
Event/Activity |
Decision |
Stuart Walker Marangaroo |
Support for participation in State Lacrosse Championships held at UWA |
APPROVE $50.00 |
Total |
1 applicant |
$50.00 |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S0078/V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tracey Martell
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
File Name: EARequests for Donations and the Waiver of Fees and Charges October 2002.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider community requests for donations and the wavier of fees and charges for October 2002, in accordance with the City’s policy for Donations, Sponsorships and the Waiver of Fees and Charges.
Background
At its meeting on 2 July 2002, Council resolved to adopt a Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
This policy requires applications from individuals or organisations $500.00 and over to be determined by Council. Consequently, a report is prepared for Council meetings coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
Detail
During this period, the City has received 2 requests for donations and the wavier of fees and charges in excess of $500.00.
Requests have been received from:
· Carramar Residents Association
· Mission Australia
Each of these applications are summarised on the following pages, along with an assessment and recommendation. Letters of application are attached.
Applicant
|
Event/Activity to be supported |
Amount requested |
Assessment and Recommendation |
Carramar Residents Association
|
The Carramar Residents Association have requested that the City support their annual Christmas Event, to be held at Staunton Value Park Carramar on 14 December 2002.
The total cost nominated for this event is $5800, of which a contribution of $1800 has been made by the development company controlling the Residential Estate, Peet and Company.
This Christmas Event has been held once before, supported by the City through the provision of the YMCA bus for the duration of the event.
Total numbers attending this event in 2001 were approximately 300, which represents a reasonably significant proportion of this suburb’s population (2589 persons – ABS 2001).
The Residents Association do not, however, operate a public liability insurance policy providing suitable coverage for community events. This means that the City would be unable to issue a donation until the Association was able to provide evidence regarding appropriate insurances, given duty of care issues surrounding event operations
|
$2500.00 |
It is recommended that this request only be partially supported by Council (to the value of $500.00) given that:
· Applications of this nature are more appropriately accepted and assessed under the City’s Community Funding Program. The current round of Community Funding will not be completed before the event has taken place, meaning that the group cannot apply in this round. They were however, informed of the April 2002 round of funding, which would have been applicable for this event, but did not apply. An Association administrative error has been noted as the cause of the group not applying for this grant earlier. · Council does not generally provide for donations of this magnitude through the Elected Members Donations Account. The provision of this donation is recommended to be conditional upon:
· The Residents Association obtaining public liability insurance for the event and providing a copy of this insurance to Council before the donation is presented · The Association being advised that requests of this nature will, in the future, only be addressed through the City’s Community Funding Program
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE $500.00 |
Mission Australia
|
Mission Australia have requested that Council support the Mission’s Christmas Lunch in the Park, which will be held on Christmas Day in Wellington Square East Perth.
This function provides Christmas lunch to people who may be experiencing difficulties in their lives due to family breakdowns, social isolation, the loss of a loved one, homelessness or mental illness.
The City supported this event in 2001 with a donation of $500.00. Approximately 1500 people attended the event last year.
If Council was to support the event again this year, recognition of any contribution would be made through the listing of the City of Wanneroo as a donor in the Mission Australia Tent and in the Mission Australia Newsletter
|
$550.00 ($50.00 increase from 2001) |
It is recommended that this event be supported to the value of $200.00 (commensurate with support of other Metro wide events by Council) given that it:
· Supports a section of the community traditionally isolated from family orientated Christmas celebrations · Has the ability to identify clients in need of early intervention of post Christmas emergency relief · Is a humanitarian endeavour aligned with Council’s previous donation commitments during this financial year (6PR Annual Children’s Christmas Parry, Rotary Club of West Perth’s Festival of Magic)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE $200.00 |
Total
|
2 applicants |
$3050.00 |
$700.00 |
Consultation
Nil
Comment
A brief summary of the dollar value of each application received and consequent recommendations are provided below.
Applicant
|
Amount Requested |
Recommendation |
Carramar Residents Association
|
$2500.00 |
APPROVE: $500.00 |
Perth City Mission
|
$550.00 |
APPROVE: $200.00 |
Total
|
$3050.00 |
$700.00 |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations, waivers and sponsorship are aligned with the City’s strategic goal of developing and supporting Healthy Communities, as follows:
2. Healthy Communities
Foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure
Goal 2.5: Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
Goal 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
Financial implications associated with this round of donation requests are provided below.
Budget 2002/2003 – Elected Member Donations |
$35,000
|
Amount expended to date: |
$13638.76 |
Available funds as at 4 November 2002 |
$21361.24 |
Impact of approval of ALL applications |
$3050.00 |
Impact of approval of RECOMMENDED applications |
$700.00 |
Remaining funds |
$20661.24 |
These calculations include donations approved under delegated authority being considered in a report to Council at this meeting, as well as Council’s recent $5000.00 donation to Kingsley Football Club.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES a donation of $500.00 from account 51 05 05 052 4402 0001 (Governance – Donations) to the Carramar Residents Association to support the staging of their annual Christmas event, to be held at Staunton Vale Park Carramar on 14 December 2002. The provision of this donation will be conditional upon the Association obtaining public liability insurance for the event and providing a certificate of currency to Council.
2. ADVISES the Carramar Residents Association that requests for donations associated with community events will, in the future, only be considered under the City’s Community Funding Program
3. APPROVES a donation of $200.00 from account 51 05 05 052 4402 0001 (Governance – Donations) to Perth City Mission to support Christmas Lunch in the Park, an event held on Christmas Day in Wellington Square, East Perth.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S07/0031V01
File Name: EAAppointment of Community Representatives to the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Tracey Martell Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tracey Martell
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider community representatives to the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group
Background
At the meeting held on 24 September 2002, Council resolved to establish a Carramar Community Reference Group, which has the overall aim of overseeing the completion of a Feasibility Study examining a neighbourhood community facility and active open space in the suburb of Carramar.
Membership of this group was appointed as follows:
· Mayor
· Central Ward Councillors
· Director, Community Development or nominated representative
· President, Carramar Residents Association or their nominated representative
· District Projects Manager, Department of Education – Joondalup office or their nominated representative
· General Manager, Peet and Company or their nominated representative
· Two (2) community representatives, sought through a public nomination process and appointed by Council
The report also included criteria for the nomination of community representatives, as follows;
· A resident of the suburbs of Carramar or Tapping
· Not a member of any stakeholder or community organisation already represented
· A brief statement regarding the contribution they can make to the Group if appointed
A public advertisement was placed in the Wanneroo Times on Tuesday 8 October 2002, calling for nominations.
Detail
At the nomination closing date (22 October 2002), the City had received four (4) nominations for representation on the Community Reference Group.
A brief summary of each of the nominations received, including assessment against the selection criteria, is provided below.
Name
|
Resident of Carramar or Tapping |
Member of stakeholder organisation |
Statement regarding contribution to the Group |
Patrick McDonald |
Yes |
No |
Private resident interested in the development of Carramar in the interest of its residents |
Adam Russell
|
Yes |
No |
Young person interested in the development of facilities for young people within the suburb
|
Adam Waghorn |
Yes |
No |
Young person interested in the development of facilities for young people within the suburb
|
Myret D’Arcy
|
Yes |
Yes |
Resident currently involved in the operation of Carramar Playgroup
|
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Given the relatively high level of interest that has been expressed in this Reference Group, it is recommended that Council appoint four representatives to the Group, rather than the two originally proposed.
Three of the applicants (Patrick McDonald, Adam Russell and Adam Waghorn) fully meet the selection criteria, however Myret D’Arcy is a member of the Carramar Residents Association, which is represented on the Group by the President, Mr Norm Hewer.
Given that Ms Darcy is also heavily involved in Carramar Playgroup (a key user of any proposed facilities) it is recommended that she be appointed, to allow for the needs of this group and children generally to be considered as part of the Study.
Statutory Compliance
This report, which seeks to appoint persons to Council Reference Group, complies with the provisions of Section 5.10 of the Local Government Act, which requires appointment to persons on the Committee is by absolute majority of Council.
Strategic Implications
The formation of a Community Reference Group and involvement of community representatives is in accordance with Council’s commitment to the development of healthy communities and in particular aligned with the following goals of the Strategic Plan:
Goal 2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future
Goal 2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community
Policy Implications
The proposed community consultation strategy and involvement in this Reference Group has been ratified by the City’s Community Consultation Review Panel, in accordance with the provisions of the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy.
Financial Implications
Council has allocated an amount of $10,000 for the completion of this project in the 2002/2003 financial year.
Funds will principally be used for costs associated with the community consultation strategy (advertising, venue hire and refreshments) and the development of plans suitable for the lodgement of a development application.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES a change to the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group membership to include four (4) official (rather than 2) community representatives, in recognition of the interest expressed in these positions
2. APPOINTS, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the following residents to the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group:
· Patrick McDonald
· Adam Russell
· Adam Waghorn
· Myret D’Arcy
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0034V01
File Name: EARevision of Internet Links Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Clare Meyers
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a review of the Internet Links Policy
Background
Council endorsed the original Internet Links Policy on 15 August 2001. This policy was developed as the result of an identified need to address:
· External organisations providing links to the City’s website from their own site, and
· Links to external websites contained on the City of Wanneroo website.
Recent examination of this policy has indicated the need for a revision of the policy, particularly in relation to the following areas:
· The existing policy implies that all links on the website have been approved and, therefore, endorsed by the City,
· The detailed assessment of all external websites being considered for an external link on the City’s site will prove time intensive,
· There is no guarantee that the external sites will remain suitable following the initial approval by the City,
· The policy conflicts with the Site Disclaimer (which states that the City takes no responsibility for external sites) and Copyright Information that also exists on the City’s website.
The matter of the revision of the Internet Links Policy also relates to the current development of the City’s Community information Database. The City has recently employed a Community Information Officer whose role is to coordinate a centralised database designed to reflect information such as:
· Accurate contact details,
· Activity related information, (e.g. role of the organisation, meeting times, activity location/s, membership fees),
· Links to community group websites, and
· A history of any City of Wanneroo funding support provided to the group, (e.g. Community Funding, donations, scholarships).
Detail
In order to provide the best possible service to both the community groups on the database and visitors to the City’s website, it is envisaged that we would provide a link to the group’s website. The current Internet Links Policy requires assessment of all external links considered for inclusion on the site. This policy results in three (3) main issues:
· The assessment of potentially more than 450 community groups’ websites will prove time intensive, with no guarantee that the sites will remain suitable following the initial approval by the City,
· The policy implies that all links on the website have been approved and, therefore, endorsed by the City, and
· The policy conflicts with the Site Disclaimer and Copyright Information that also exists on the City’s website.
Consultation
Internal consultation was undertaken prior to the development of the revised policy.
Internet-based research was also carried out to establish current practices by other local government authorities, state government agencies and non-government organisations whose sites contain external links.
With this in mind, it is envisaged that a 12-month review of the new policy will be undertaken, involving further consultation with relevant parties.
Comment
It is recommended that the revised Internet Links Policy be adopted due to its ability to provide a framework that:
· Addresses concerns regarding links to external websites contained on the City’s site,
· Distances the City from any association with or implied endorsement of external sites,
· Provides a guide for assessing requests from external bodies wanting to include the a link to the City’s site on their website,
· Provides a beneficial service to both the community groups on the database and visitors to the City’s website by allowing them access to further information, should they choose this option, and
· Protects the interest of the City and visitors to its website.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Internet Links Policy is supportive of Council’s strategic directions regarding the creation and development of Healthy Communities.
Policy Implications
This report, if endorsed, will result in the operation of an Internet Links Policy.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the revised Internet Links Policy, as follows:
INTERNET LINKS POLICY
Policy Owner: Marketing Services
Distribution: All staff
Implementation: 5 November 2002
Scheduled Review: 5 November 2003
Objective
To enhance the provision of a quality internet-based service for visitors to the City’s website by providing links to the external websites of community groups, government agencies and other community service providers in the City of Wanneroo, whilst protecting the interests of Council.
Statement
The City of Wanneroo’s web page provides electronic local government and council information to its ratepayers, stakeholder and interested parties. There are occasions when linking to an external body assists in the provision of relevant information and, therefore, improves service to the customer. Linking reduces the duplication of information and improves the currency and relevance of content.
Definitions
“External Body”
Any organisation external to the City of Wanneroo, i.e.: government organisations, community groups.
“City of Wanneroo’s web site”, or “City’s web site”
The web site used to officially represent the City of Wanneroo, i.e.: www.wanneroo.wa.gov.au
“Hyperlink”
A link which, when clicked on, will take the viewer to another website.
“Window”
The framed screen in which a website on the internet is viewed.
Considerations
External body linking to City’s site
It is considered Internet protocol that any organisation wishing to link to another organisation’s web site should approach that organisation for permission. In reality, this rarely happens, as it is easier and less time intensive to simply obtain the web address and establish a hyperlink.
In many cases, the City may never be aware that the external body has linked to the City’s site. The benefits of an external body linking to the City would usually be perceived as positive as traffic is channelled to the City’s site and the information presented by the City is controlled.
When the City is approached by an external organisation wishing to link to the City’s web site, the following issues should be considered:
· Relevance of the external body to the City’s stakeholders & customers
· The positive traffic which will be directed to the City’s web site as a result of the link
· The degree to which the link from the external body impacts on the City
· If the City denied the link, whether it would follow through with legal action to remove any unauthorised link
Links from the City’s website to External Sites
Whilst the City’s site may contain external links, these external information sources are outside the City’s control and should be treated accordingly by end-users (visitors to the site).
As a result, the City will take a number of measures to ensure that:
a) Visitors to the City’s site are aware that they are entering an external site by accessing links to these third party sites, and
b) Visitors moving from the City’s site to an external site are aware that the City in no way endorses the site or its content in any way.
These measures are to include:
1. Website Guidelines for groups controlling external websites linked to the City’s site – these will be available online and in hard copy for access by community groups. This will include an exit clause outlining the City’s right to remove at any time a link deemed unsuitable for public viewing.
2. Transition Disclaimer Page – this page will appear as a transition page when visitors to the City’s site access an external link. The page will inform the viewer that they are leaving the City’s site and that the City does not endorse the site in any way.
3. External Link to open in new window – When an external website is accessed via a link on the City’s website, the external site will open in a new window.
4. City of Wanneroo website to remain open behind new link window – The City’s website will remain open when external sites are accessed, as external sites will open in a new window.
Approval of External Links
External links relevant to particular Directorates shall be approved by the Director. Any links deemed as requiring special consideration will be referred to the CEO for determination.
Responsibility for Implementation
Manager Marketing
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S17/0006
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
File Name: EANonrec.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 3 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rh Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Clare Meyers Date 16 October 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a summary of non-recurrent funding received by the Community Development Directorate during 2001/2002.
Background
The Community Development Directorate has established a consistent track record in attaining recurrent funding support in areas such as HACC (Home And Community Care), Emergency Relief and Financial Counselling.
Since the introduction of a Grants Officer position in May 2001, the Directorate has consolidated and improved processes associated with applying for non-recurrent grants. This has resulted in increased access to a greater number of funding sources and the streamlining of the grant application process.
A component of this process has been the establishment and maintenance of a Grants Register for non-recurrent grants submitted by the City to external funding bodies, as well as tracking the progress of these applications and acquitting funding allocations that are received.
Detail
The following table outlines the successful non-recurrent funding applications submitted by the Community Development Directorate to external funding bodies during the 2001/2002 financial year.
Table 1 – Successful Non-Recurrent Grant Applications 2001/2002
|
Grant |
Project Submitted |
Date |
Unit |
Requested |
Received |
1 |
Centenary of Federation WA |
Benchmarks Project |
01-Jul-01 |
Family services |
$4,600.00 |
$4,600.00 |
2 |
Lotteries - Children's Services Small Grants |
Jenolan Way - playgroup equipment |
17-Jul-01 |
Family Services |
$25,000.00 |
$25,000.00 |
3 |
Lotteries & Museums Australia - Special Purpose Grants for Museums |
Transportable museum display for "Celebrating Wanneroo's 100 Years" |
20-Jul-01 |
Library & Heritage Services |
$14,500.00 |
$3,500.00 |
4 |
Lotteries - Centenary of Federation Funding |
Two Rocks Project Launch |
27-Jul-01 |
Policy & Planning |
$2,000.00 |
$2,000.00 |
5 |
BankWest Seniors Week |
Spring Into It - Seniors' Activities |
01-Aug-01 |
Leisure Services |
$500.00 |
$439.00 |
6 |
Lotteries - Centenary of Federation Funding |
Benchmarks Project Launch |
13-Aug-01 |
Family Services |
$2,000.00 |
$2,000.00 |
7 |
FESA Bushfire Service of WA - Grant Scheme |
Central Fire Brigade - 600 ltr Fast Attack Appliance |
30-Aug-01 |
Ranger Services |
$32,997.21 |
$32,997.00 |
8 |
CATALYST – Community Arts Network WA |
Street Soundz |
10-Sep-01 |
Youth Services |
$9,250.00 |
$9,250.00 |
9 |
Healthway - Arts Sponsorship |
LIVE - Expansion of program: LIVE Art, LIVE Multimedia, etc. |
09-Oct-01 |
Community Events |
$11,500.00 |
$7,000.00 |
10 |
Lotteries- Gordon Reid Foundation |
Yanchep -Clarkson Young Women's Group - Chicz Biz |
25-Oct-01 |
Youth Services |
$14,585.00 |
$14,585.00 |
11 |
Cultural Heritage - Conservation Grants - Lotteries |
Cockman House - Landscape Mgt Plan |
30-Nov-01 |
Library & Heritage Services |
$5,350.00 |
$5,350.00 |
12 |
FESA - Personal Protective Equipment Grants |
Personal Protection Equipment |
30-Nov-01 |
Ranger Services |
$2,265.38 |
$2,265.38 |
13 |
Lotteries - Cultural Heritage - Conservation Grants |
Buckingham House - Conservation of dairy farming implements. |
30-Nov-01 |
Library & Heritage Services |
$4,175.00 |
$4,175.00 |
14 |
Family & Children’s Services - School Holiday Program Funding |
Holiday Program - July 2002 |
14-Dec-01 |
Youth Services |
$2,000.00 |
$2,000.00 |
15 |
Safer WA - Community Security Program |
Safer Citizens Patrol Service |
15-Feb-02 |
Ranger & Safety Services |
$40,000.00 |
$25,000.00 |
16 |
FESA - Bushfire Equipment Grants |
Central Brigade - 600 ltr Toyota Fast Attack |
29-Mar-02 |
Ranger Services |
$34,890.50 |
$32,150.00 |
17 |
FESA - Bushfire Equipment Grants |
Quinns Brigade - 3,000 ltr 4WD |
29-Mar-02 |
Ranger Services |
$111,477.20 |
$112,350.00 |
18 |
SGIO Crimesafe Grants |
Youth Challenge Camp |
10-May-02 |
Youth Services |
$3,575.00 |
$3,575.00 |
19 |
Dept. for Community Development - School Holiday Grants |
Aboriginal Culture Awareness Camp |
07-Jun-02 |
Youth Services |
$2,000.00 |
$2,000.00 |
20 |
Lotteries - 2002 Emergency Services Grants |
Wanneroo & Quinns VFBs - GPS, HHU, radio & computer equipment |
28-Jun-02 |
Ranger Services |
$16,209.43 |
Pending |
21 |
National Library of Australia - Community Heritage Grants |
Preservation Survey |
28-Jun-02 |
Heritage Services |
$3,500.00 |
Pending |
|
|
|
|
|
$342,374.72 |
$290,236.38 |
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is envisaged that a similar report will be presented to Council for noting following the 2002/2003 financial year.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Seeking alternative funding sources to assist the City in its objectives is supportive of Council’s strategic directions regarding the commitment to Corporate Management and Development through the creation of an organisational culture that encourages more effective management of our financial and human resources.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the summary of non-recurrent funding received by the Community Development Directorate in the 2001/2002 financial year.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0086V01
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 05 November 2002
Attachments: 1
File Name: CAnnual Report.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To adopt the 2001/02 Annual Report for the City of Wanneroo.
Background
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 a local government is required to prepare an Annual Report on its operations for the preceding financial year by 31st December 2002.
Detail
The Annual Report has been prepared by Council’s Administration and it includes the Annual Financial Statements audited by Council’s auditors. (Attachment 1) .
The report has been prepared based on the priorities and direction set in the previous Principal Activities Plan where available, performance indicators are provided or comparative indicators as appropriate.
Section 5.53 of the Local Government Act 1995 requires Council prepare an Annual Report, which is to contain:-
(a) A report from the Mayor;
(b) A report from the CEO;
(c) A report of the principal activities commenced or continued during the financial year;
(d) An assessment of the local government’s performance in relation to each principal activity;
(e) An overview of the principal activities that are proposed to commence or to continue in the next financial year;
(f) The financial report for the financial year;
(g) Such information as may be prescribed in relation to the payments made to employees;
(h) The auditor’s report for the financial year; and
(i) Such other information as may be prescribed.
The adoption of the Annual Report is to include (f) the financial report for the financial year. The Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 regulation 36 set out the type of information that is to be included in the financial report.
The full set of Audited Financial Statements are detailed in Attachment 1 (to be circulated under separate cover when available) of this report. It is common practice in local government to present the Financial Statements in a concise format together with a concise Audited Statement in the Annual Report with copies of the full Audited Annual Financial Statements being available to the public with out charge on request.
Section 5.27 on the Local Government Act states that a general meeting of the electors is to be held once every financial year and not more than 56 days after the local government accepts the annual report.
The Mayor has approved the holding of the General Meeting of Electors on Friday 22 November 2002 commencing at 6.00pm.
Consultation
Section 5.55 of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that Council give local public notice of the availability of the annual report once adopted by Council. This will be carried out by advertisements in the Wanneroo Times and notices placed on Council’s Public Notice Boards.
This year the publication of the Annual Report will be conducted in-house and the savings made being directed towards a two page summary of the Annual Report in the Wanneroo Times.
Statutory Compliance
As detailed in the report the Local Government Act 1995 requires:
1. Section 5.53: What information shall be included in the Annual Report.
2. Section 5.54: Council must accept the annual report.
3. Section 5.55: Local public notice must be given of the availability of the Annual report once adopted by Council.
Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 regulation 36 specifies the information that is to be included in the Annual Financial Statements.
Comment
The Chief Executive Officer will provide comment after the Financial Statements have been presented.
Strategic Implications
With the adoption of the new strategic plan for the City and the development of performance indicators for the strategic plan, future Annual Reports will detail Council’s performance against the strategic plan.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As detailed in the Annual Report.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPT the City of Wanneroo Annual Report for the year ending the 30th June 2002 as detailed in Attachment 1.
2. ACCEPT the Annual Audited Financial Statements for the City of Wanneroo for the year ending the 30th June 2002 as detailed in Attachment 2.
3. RECEIVE NOTICE that the Annual General Electors Meeting will be held at 6.00pm on Friday 22 November 2002 in Council Chambers.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Attachments 1
and 2 to be circulated
under separate cover.
Due to the size of these attachments if you wish to view the Annual Report or the Annual Audited Financial Statements please go to the agenda for the Annual General Meeting of Electors to be held 22 November 2002.
File Ref: 03567
File Name: AASTRATEGIC PLAN QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT SEPTEMBER QUARTER 2002.doc This line will not
Level 3 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Charles Johnson
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the September 2002 Quarterly Report on the implementation of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2002-2005.
Background
At the Council meeting held on 21 May 2002, the Strategic Plan for the City of Wanneroo 2002-2005 “Our People, Our Future 2002-2005” was adopted. The Plan was the result of a very extensive community consultation and engagement process. With the information gathered from this process Elected Members and staff worked together to develop the draft Strategic Plan. The draft Plan was available for public comment from 18 December 2001 to 19 March 2002.
Detail
In order to ensure that the Strategic Plan sets the direction for Council, Elected Members and Administration developed a series of Directorate Business Plans and Annual Business Unit Plans, for the five directorates of Council being:
· Office of the CEO
· Corporate Services
· Community Development
· Planning and Development
· Technical Services
These Business Plans and Annual Plans detail how Council will achieve the goals and strategies in the Strategic Plan and how as an organisation we will measure our performance against the Strategic Plan.
Attachment 1 is the first quarterly report on the implementation of the Strategic Plan. (Note: Attachment1 has been provided to Elected Members at the Policy Forum.) It allows both the Council and the community to track the implementation progress of all strategic projects over the next 12 months.
The quarterly report is arranged around the four main goals of the Strategic Plan being:
1. Environmental Sustainability
2. Healthy Communities
3. Economic Development
4. Corporate Management and Development
Additional information is provided on the strategic achievements of the Plan to date, major policy statements, corporate scorecard and capital works program.
Comment
The City of Wanneroo is well positioned to meet the needs of one of the fastest growing communities in Australia. Council and community have worked together in the development of the plan and will continue to work together in review and evaluation of the plan.
The City of Wanneroo is one of the leaders in local government in developing systems to ensure that the actions required in the strategic plan are delivered. These include performance agreements with management linked to strategic project completion, Certified Workplace Agreements for the City’s staff that are linked to key performance measures in the Strategic Plan and Business Unit Plans cascading the action objectives of the strategic plan into the Annual Unit Plans for the City’s business units.
Statutory Compliance
Whilst the Local Government Act 1995 does not require Councils to complete a Strategic Plan, it does require Councils to plan for large financial expenditures through the development of a Principal Activity Plan.
The current review of the Local Government Act proposes to delete the requirements to prepare a Principal Activity Plan and replace it with the development of a Strategic Plan. The city is well placed to meet these requirements.
Strategic Implications
The Strategic Plan is the compass for the organisation containing strategic implications of future Council decisions.
Policy Implications
The Strategic Plan and Quarterly Reports will become the reference point for all policy formulation and review. Several actions within the Strategic Plan relate to the formation of several key policies and statements.
Financial Implications
The Strategic Plan is the guiding document for future expenditure for the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ADOPT the September Quarter 2002 Report on the implementation of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2002-2005 – “Our People, Our Future” as detailed in Attachment 1.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
September Quarter 2002
our future
OUR PEOPLE
Report Highlights ………………………………….………..…… 3
Strategic Plan Summary ………………..…… 4
Acronyms ……………………. 5
Strategic Achievements …………….………. 6
Employee of the Month Awards …………….……… 7
Technical Services
Environmental Asset Conservation Initiatives …………………….. 8
Planning and Development
Local Environmental Strategy …………….……… 12
Efficient Resource Use Initiatives …………….....…… 13
Office of the CEO
Community Consultation Policy …….……………… 14
Technical Services
Infrastructure Management Plan ………….………… 15
Facilities Re-development ……….…………… 15
Transport Strategy ………….…………. 20
Community Development
Independent Living Programs ………………….… 21
Heritage Conservation and Community Identity ………………..….… 24
Safety and Security Programs ………..…….…….. 26
Planning and Development
Healthy Communities Initiatives ……………….…… 28
Planning and Development
Economic Development Strategy ……….……………………… 29
Employment Generation Initiatives ………….…………... 29
Business Support Initiatives ………….……….…………... 30
Tourism Development Initiatives ……………………… 30
Office of the CEO
Corporate Research and Framework ……………………… 31
Style Manual …………………………………….………..… 33
Service Agreements ……………………..……..………..… 33
Staff Training and Development ………………………………. 34
Corporate Services
Strategic People Management Plan ……………..……..… 35
Performance Management System ……………..……..... 36
Electronic Document Management ……...……….…...…. 36
Major Policy Statements ………….………..…………..…….… 38
REPORT
HIGHLIGHTS
OUR PEOPLE our
future City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2002 - 2005
|
Mission Statement The City of Wanneroo provides the services and facilities to meet the changing needs of our community through: § Visionary leadership § Community consultation & involvement § Responsible resource management
Vision Statement By the year 2007 –
The City of Wanneroo will be a vibrant centre of creative growth known for the quality of lifestyle choices and development patterns, which enhance sustainability. This will be achieved through: § Organisational culture § Community well being § Infrastructure and service provision § Planning for a balanced environment |
Values Our values describe what we believe in, and how we aspire to operate together as a council. · Commitment and proactive approach · Innovative and creative thinking · Courtesy, honesty and respect · Quality service.
Key Success Factors § Environment § Community § Economic Management § Sustainable Development § Organisational Management |
|||||
To value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of our city |
To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure |
To maximise opportunities for balanced economic growth and development within the city |
To create a culture that is committed to corporate learning, evolution and proper management of our natural, financial and human resources |
||||
1.1 Conserve and enhance environmental assets 1.2 Develop sustainable waste management options 1.3 Support efficient use of water, energy and other resources 1.4 Foster a culture of environmental awareness, ownership and action within the community and the organisation |
2.1. Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future 2.2. Provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning 2.3. Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network 2.4. Support safe and secure communities 2.5. Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity 2.6. Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community 2.7. Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities |
3.1. Create an economic development strategy 3.2. Identify, support and respond to the needs of existing and new industries 3.3. Encourage employment growth within the community 3.4. Support a viable rural industry 3.5. Develop the tourism industry 3.6. Develop a Wanneroo Brand |
4.1. Review and develop policies covering governance and management of our city 4.2. Create harmony and unity through open communication, participation and ownership 4.3. Establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service |
||||
Strategic
Achievements - Highlights
Environmental Sustainability |
§ Biodiversity Project - Council is supporting two projects associated with the Perth Biodiversity Project, the survey of birds on bush land reserves in the City by Birds Australia and “Bushlinks” which involves improving management of local bush land reserves by involving volunteers.
who? § Recycling - The City has extended the recycling program to over 3,800 residents in the rural and outermost suburbs. The amount of recyclables resulting from this is estimated to increase to over 100 tonnes
§Gnangara Lakes Reserve - Council has adopted a draft Management Plan for Gnangara Lakes Reserve. The aim of the plan is to control off-road vehicles, enable pedestrian access, improve facilities, preserve bush land degradation and enable rehabilitation.
§ Quinns Beach – Emergency works and design of permanent works has been undertaken.
|
||
Healthy Communities |
§ Streets Sounds Program - The Street Sounds program commences on 30th August 2002 at Koondoola Community Hall. The program is aimed at providing local youth between the ages of 12 and 17 with new break dancing and DJ skills in a professional and controlled environment.
Community Services Directory- The new City of Wanneroo Community Services Directory has been delivered to all residents and businesses within the City of Wanneroo. The directory is a handy reference for the community on Council Services and facilities.
§ Boost for local Surf Life Saving Clubs -Approval has been given for construction to proceed on the new Mindarie/Quinns Surf Life Saving Club facility
what? Scholarship Program - $5,000 in scholarships to go to Girrawheen, Wanneroo, Clarkson and Yanchep District High Schools.
§ Safety and Security - The City’s Safer Citizens Patrol Officers are now able to directly communicate with local Police following the installation of two-way base stations at Clarkson, Two Rocks and Warwick police stations.
§ TravelSmart Programme - The programme being implemented in Marangaroo was launched by the State Minister for Planning and Infrastructure on 5 September 2002 and is aimed at increasing the use of alternative modes of transport.
§ Hepburn Avenue - Work has commenced on the extension to Hepburn Avenue and Mirrabooka Avenue for the tendered sum of $2,842,819.
|
||
Economic Development |
§ Home Based Business - The City of Wanneroo hosted a home-based business night on 17 July with over 85 participants. The aim was to promote and encourage home-based business in the City of Wanneroo, which helps create jobs, and has a positive impact on the local economy.
§ Employment Opportunities - Employment opportunities for up to 140 people in Wanneroo will result from the establishment of the $80 million Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) project in the Neerabup Industrial Estate, located north of Flynn Drive.
§ Small Business Development Conference - Delegates from 37, Business Enterprise Centres will descend on our City for their annual Major Business Conference. The City of Wanneroo was chosen due to our commitment to fostering small business development. |
||
Corporate Management &Development |
§ Budget - Council adopted the City of Wanneroo budget on 19 July 2002 based on a 0% increase in rates and removal of the separate security charge.
§ Innovation - The Innovation Scheme is a new initiative to capture ideas and encourages staff to express and develop new methods or practices that assist us in our service delivery to our customers.
§ Community Consultation & Participation Policy - The draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy was endorsed by Council on 11 June 2002. The policy ensures all consultation by the City is undertaken before making decisions and provides you with the opportunity to have your say in decisions that affect your lifestyle. Over 17 community groups have been visited and three Community Forums in Two Rocks, Girrawheen and Wanneroo held.
|
EMPLOYEES OF THE MONTH
JUNE |
JULY |
AUGUST |
Peter Davis Contracts and Property
Peter has been excellent in providing assistance to Technical Services in producing Tender Documents, notably in regards to the Hepburn Avenue Project Tender Documents and Operational Services Supply and Services Tenders.
Using Excel spreadsheets, Peter produced price schedules for three tenders, involving 7000 entries, for Operational Services to evaluate these tenders.
|
Sam Neale Approval Services
Nothing is ever too much trouble, when any problem or difficulties arise, people run to Sam who takes the problem on board endeavouring to progress and resolve or solve it.
Sam is extremely dedicated to his job and work colleagues. |
Abdulla Adam Community Services
Since the departure of the other Financial Counsellor in May, Abdulla has competently handled all services for City of Wanneroo. Throughout this, Abdulla has maintained his usual calm, helpful and dependable manner.
Abdulla can be relied upon for his insightful and considered opinion and his willingness to assist others at any time with no fuss at all. His excellent inter-personal skills and multi-lingual abilities make him popular and respected with his clients.
|
1.Environmental
Sustainability
Technical Services |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Strategic Objective 1.1: Conserve and enhance environmental assets |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Project: ENVIRONMENT ASSET CONSERVATION INITATIVES |
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
IN |
Develop an Implementation program and prepare concept designs for the upgrading of stormwater drainage outlets into Yellagonga Regional Park |
Sustainable design solutions that deliver future operational and maintenance efficiencies with a report to Council for endorsement of a Prioritised Program for the upgrading of stormwater drainage outlets into Yellagonga Regional Park Jun 03
|
In-house data being reviewed and collated for development of a Project Brief and subsequent invitation for, consultancy submissions. |
|
|
|
||||
OS |
Develop and implement a Weed Management Policy for weed control within the City’s parks, Conservation and Road Reserves |
Implementation of a Weed Management Policy subject to a report to Council by 31/12/02.
|
Draft policy has been presented at Policy Forum and to Community Consultation Review Panel.
A public workshop has been held, current public consultation period closes 28/10/ 02. |
|
Three-month herbicide/pesticide free trial will be undertaken by Mar 03. |
|
||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
OS |
Develop and implement a Rural Verge Management Policy |
Implementation of new Rural Verge Management Policy
|
Developed interim rural verge management strategy and construction/ maintenance guidelines, currently being implemented.
Awaiting State Roadside Conservation Committee release of the State policy in (early 2003).
|
|
|
|
||||
OS |
In partnership with the State Government implement beach protection works at Quinns Beach (Stage 1) |
Development and implementation of a staged remedial works programme for the identified coastal protection solution which is coastal protection works in the form of sea groynes to be constructed and complimented with sand nourishment
|
Emergency coastal protection works involving placement of large limestone rocks along erosion scarp completed.
The “Quinns Beach Erosion and Coastal Protection” Study Report has been accepted by Council on 3/9/02. Development Application made to WAPC for construction of recommended coastal protection works. Funding submission made to Minister for DPI. Tender for the construction of two groynes and sand nourishment has been advertised.
|
Construction of two groynes and is due to commence in mid Nov 02.
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
LL |
Develop a Trails Master Plan to encourage the sustainable use of environmentally sensitive areas |
Trails Master Plan for the City of Wanneroo |
Carry over funds from 2001/02 to 2002/03 June 02 Confirmation of grant Aug 02
|
Appoint consultant Oct 02 |
Receive report/draft plan Jan 03
Present Plan to Council Mar 03 |
|
||||
PS |
Develop a Commitment Statement to the Environment, incorporating consultation with key stakeholders |
Community consultation by 1st quarter 2003/04
Preparation of report for Council’s consideration by 2nd quarter 2003/04
|
|
|
|
Research & preparation of statement by 4th quarter |
||||
EW |
Develop public awareness and education programs to promote waste minimisation |
Programme Launched Jan 2003
Community Awareness of programme (Annual Customer Service Survey)
|
Working with the Mindarie Regional Council on a multi council information strategy on secondary waste treatment. |
|
|
|
||||
EW |
Develop and implement waste management strategies that support the implementation of Waste 2020 by seeking and developing markets for using waste as a resource |
Number of opportunities investigated
Number of initiatives implemented.
|
Preliminary work undertaken on the use of waste broken glass from the recycling facility in brick making. |
|
|
|
||||
EW |
Extend comprehensive fortnightly recycling services to all residents of the City |
Rural residents will have option of using fortnightly recycling bag service in place of current limited service by 30 August 2002
|
Extended existing services to 3800 residents in rural areas by 30 Aug 02
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
PS |
Develop a series of environmental awareness programs for City staff and the community |
The preparation of a report for Council to consider the framework for an annual award/grant scheme for environmental work within the City
The development of an environmental section to the City’s web site
A report regarding the environmental section to the City’s homeowners pack to be submitted to the Director.
|
|
|
Preparation of report by 3rd quarter
Environmental report for City’s homeowners pack by 3rd quarter |
Development of website by 4th quarter |
||||
|
||||||
Strategic Objective 1.1: Conserve and enhance environmental assets |
||||||
|
||||||
Project: LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY |
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
PS |
Finalisation of the local environmental strategy |
The presentation of a report for Council to consider adopting the final strategy
|
Public comment period on draft strategy concluded. Finalise Local Environmental Strategy
|
Report on final strategy to be presented to Council |
|
|
PS |
Develop management plans and strategies for the protection and conservation of important environmental assets |
Finalise Lake Gnangara Management plan
Finalise Review of Mindarie Beach Foreshore Management Plan
Finalise review of Yanchep/Two Rocks foreshore management plan
|
Vegetation study underway
|
Finalise Lake Gnangara Plan by 2nd quarter |
|
Finalise Mindarie Beach review by 4th quarter
Finalise Yanchep/Two Rocks review by 4th quarter |
PS |
Undertake a series of key environmental projects relevant to: · Local Environmental Strategy: · Greenhouse gas reduction strategy · Environmental sustainability
Memorandum of understanding for recovery and management of rare flora & fauna in reserves Standard development approval conditions for development adjacent to wetlands |
Greenhouse gas reduction strategy
Environmental sustainability
Memorandum of understanding |
|
|
|
Preparation of MOU for consideration by CALM by 4th quarter 2003/04
Development of set of standard development approval conditions for development adjacent to wetlands by 4th quarter 2002/03
|
Strategic Objective 1.3: Support efficient use of water, energy and other resources |
||||||
|
||||||
Project: EFFICIENT RESOURCE USE INITATIVES |
||||||
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
OS |
Implement summer watering regime aligned with benchmarks and implement accurate record logs of summer water usage at a representative sample of irrigated parks being not less than 25% of irrigated park locations
Reduce by at least 5% bore pump hours, car park lighting hours and parkland lighting hours of operation and monitor annual energy use against newly defined reduced essential needs |
Representative sample (25%) of irrigated parks to have an accurate record of summer water usage and bore pump energy use through establishment of irrigated park water usage logs.
Parkland and car park existing annual power consumption measurement to determine reduced annual power usage
|
Preliminary data has been collected.
Each irrigation line is currently being accurately set to required running time for each individual output requirement.
Representative parkland and carpark lighting sample is currently being determined for baseline review of lighting durations
|
Further data to be collected and benchmarks to be established by 15/11/02 in readiness for implementation of summer watering regime. |
|
|
2.Healthy Communities
|
||||||
Strategic Objective 2.1: Achieve an understanding of our community needs – present and future |
||||||
|
||||||
Project: COMMUNITY CONSULTATION POLICY |
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
SE |
To develop a community consultation policy which will increase community involvement and awareness in the decision making process.
To develop a policy that provides guidance to the appropriate level of community consultation based on the level of community interest |
Development and adoption of a Community Consultation Strategy |
Council endorsed draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy on 11/06/02.
Conducted community consultation program with staff
Visited over 17 community groups
Held three Community Forums in Two Rocks, Girrawheen and Wanneroo Aug 02.
|
|
|
|
Technical Services |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Strategic Objective 2.6: Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Project: INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||||
LL |
Manage the endorsed capital works project: Clarkson Library |
New service point established; increase in membership and usage of libraries |
Council agreement with LandCorp on new site Aug 02
Council agreement on budget Aug 02
|
Preparation of plans by architect Nov 02 |
Tender for construction Mar 03
Appointment of Clarkson Branch librarian Mar 03
|
Planning for staff & equipment needs and incorporation in appropriate capital and operational budgets May 03
|
||||||
LL |
Manage the following endorsed capital works projects: A multipurpose community facility at Lot 211 Mindarie incorporating facilities for life saving, the local fishing club and community groups |
Construction of Surf Life Saving facility and associated infrastructure at Lot 211 |
Approval of development plans by WAPC Sept 02 |
Prepare tender docs Nov 02 |
Report tender outcome to Council Jan 03
Commence construction Feb 03
|
|
||||||
LL |
Implement a new electronic library information service in all City libraries |
Increased community use of the libraries to access electronic information resources
|
Pricing for statewide public library consortia received, confirmed City of Wanneroo participation.
Waiting for State Library decision on whether it will agree to be the central billing body.
|
Once State Library decision is known the implementation of access to the networked services will be determined with the service provider. |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||||
PS |
Develop and review structure plans, policies and local laws including the Tree Preservation Policy. |
Preparation of reports for Council on tree preservation policy, equine policy, Clarkson/Butler pedestrian bicycle study & commercial vehicle parking in rural areas
|
Draft Tree Preservation Policy adopted by Council for consultation |
Finalise tree preservation policy |
|
Review structure plans and policies to reflect requirements of District Planning Scheme No. 2. |
||||||
PS |
Prepare Municipal Heritage inventory |
The preparation of reports on stage 1 of the Municipal Heritage Inventory and appointment of consultant for stage 2 of the review by the third quarter
|
Consultants draft report received September 2002. |
Receive consultants final report |
Prepare report to Council on final stage 1 review
Appoint Consultant for stage 2 |
|
||||||
PS |
Identify and develop priority local planning strategies including signage strategy |
Preparation of a report for Council’s consideration of the final Signage Strategy
|
|
Undertake draft signage strategy workshop following 1st round of consultation
Prepare report to adopt draft signage strategy following public workshops. Oct 02
|
Complete community consultation for signage strategy
|
Prepare report on final signage strategy |
||||||
PS |
Identify and develop Quinns Rocks Townsite Residential Planning Strategy |
Preparation of a report for Council’s consideration of the final residential study
|
Consultant for Quinns Townsite study appointed on 16/8/02. |
Prepare draft Quinns Townsite study. |
Submission of draft consultants report |
|
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||||
CDD |
Consider as part of the prioritised list of capital list of works;
|
Appropriate sites for mobile library stops located and included in structure plans for sites in Butler and Landsdale
Appropriate justification and community needs assessment reflected in planning for Carramar Community Facility
|
Mobile Library stop site in Lansdale identified as part of the DA for the shopping centre at 127 The Broadview.
Developed Community Reference group for Carramar Community Facility Sept 02
Feasibility study for centre started Sep 02
|
Report regarding feasibility study endorsed by Council Dec 02 |
Concept Plans developed and costed (if required) Jan/Feb 03
Facility listed in capital works budget 2003/04 Mar 03 |
|
||||||
Project: FACILITIES RE-DEVELOPMENT |
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
LL |
Develop and implement a Kingsway Infrastructure Upgrade Program |
Formulation and adoption of Kingsway Infrastructure Upgrade Program
|
WPFC proposal not proceeding,
Proposal for Athletic Centre under consideration.
|
|
|
|
LL |
Develop and implement a maintenance and refurbishment plan for Girrawheen and Wanneroo libraries |
Refurbished buildings result in improved conditions for staff and library users and increase in usage
|
Refurbishment plans for Girrawheen Library completed. |
|
|
|
LL |
Manage the following endorsed capital works projects: Refurbishment of Hainsworth Leisure Centre. |
Refurbishment of Hainsworth leisure Centre
|
Prepare tender docs Sep 02 |
Report tender outcome to Council Nov 02
Commence construction Dec 02
|
|
Construction complete Apr 03 |
LL |
Develop a coastal infrastructure development, maintenance, replacement and management program |
Coastal infrastructure development, maintenance, replacement and management program developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
LL |
Manage the upgrade of facilities at the City’s two public golf courses (Carramar and Marangaroo) |
Capital improvements to Marangaroo & Carramar Public Golf Courses in accordance with the results of Needs assessment
|
Prepare tender documentation Jun 02
Advertise & receive tenders Sep 02 |
Report to Council recommending successful tenderer Oct 02
Construction commences Nov 02 |
|
Construction Completed Apr 03 |
RS |
Set up animal impounding facilities as the centre for training and animal education.
Set up community volunteer program to assist in caring for impounded animals. |
More effective and efficient pound operation
Increase in customer satisfaction
Decrease in the euthanasia level Increase in dog registrations
No. of volunteer hours
Percentage of dogs euthanased in relation to registration
|
The working group for pound improvements is currently undertaking preliminary investigations.
Photographing of dogs for the What’s Happening commenced on 24/9/02
The number of dog registrations will be ascertained at the completion of the renewal period at the end of November
The use of volunteers and the associated benefits are still being assessed.
Combination of the above initiatives will be used to assess the impact on % of dogs euthanased by 30/6/03.
|
|
|
|
Strategic Objective 2.3: Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network |
||||||
|
||||||
Project: TRANSPORT STRATEGY |
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
IN |
Develop an Integrated Transport Strategy addressing all modes of transport and infrastructure needs within the City |
Community focussed Integrated Transport Strategy that sets the City’s direction through the terms of the City’s Strategic Plan.
Report to be presented to Council for endorsement Jun 03
|
Data review undertaken.
Meet with the DPI regarding information sharing/resource, assistance in developing a Project Brief and subsequent invitation for consultancy submissions.
|
|
|
|
IN |
Participation in the TravelSmart Program conducted by the Transport Section of the Dept for Planning & Infrastructure (DPI) to promote alternatives uses of transport through practical community education and awareness programs including:
· The provision of bus timetables to residents and display of timetables at bus stops/bays
· Encouragement of the use of alternative modes of transport ie. Why drive when you can walk? |
Marangaroo community involvement during the 2002/2003 financial year and understanding of the transport alternatives available to them
Increased utilisation of transport alternatives by the Marangaroo community (baseline measures to be supplied by Transport Section of DPI on completion of the project)
|
The Marangaroo TravelSmart Program has commenced with the Transport Section of the DPI.
Currently following up with telephone interviews to determine the extent of individualised marketing required for the area.
TravelSmart officially launched at John Moloney Park (Marangaroo) on 5/9/02 by the State Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
IN |
Implement the recommendations of the Wanneroo Bike Plan 2002 subject to annual budget provision for capital works |
Number of projects on Capital Works program designed and completed for the 2002/2003 financial year
|
Council approved bicycle facility works programme as part of the 2002/2003 Capital Works Design/Construction Program. |
|
|
|
Community Development |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Strategic Objective 2.7: Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Project: INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM. |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|
|||||||||
CS & CDD |
Undertake capacity building activities with local communities to assist in the development of community identity, local activities and services
|
Increased capacity of identified sectors of the community to cope with life challenges;
Formation of local community based groups with similar interests that support others facing life challenges
Artwork completed & displayed at Awesome Festival and in local community
Self help Marketing Handbook distributed as a resource to assist groups applying for or in receipt of Community Funding Grant market events/ programs |
Commencement of Young Women’s Group, Teen Parents Group, Youth Life Skills program. Young Mums Support Group.
Development of Awesome project concepts and plans September 02
Commence development of Self help Marketing handbook September 02
Publication approved, finalised and printed Sept 02 |
Secure funding for project via New Initiative 2002/03 Nov 02
Coordinate local groups and schools to produce artwork Nov 02
Artwork unveiled in local community at Two Rocks Blessing of the Fleet Festival; Nov 02
Artwork displayed at Awesome festival, Perth Nov 02
Artwork displayed during Centenary of Local Govt celebrations Nov 02
Distribution of Handbook to applicants at Community Funding Program info sessions Oct 02 & ongoing
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||||||||
LL |
Further develop the City’s SmartClubs Program, incorporating a range of additional programs for community organisations |
SmartClub’s program evaluated and improved as a result of data collected, survey results and consultation with various stakeholders |
|
|
Conduct evaluation of program outcomes to date February 2003
Liaise with Dept of Sport & Recreation regarding future direction and funding options February 2003
Liaise with internal stakeholders and seek input to possible expansion of Program to cater for other areas March 2003
|
Develop detailed draft plan of Program activities for 2003/04 April 03
Seek Director’s endorsement for revised SmartClubs Program for 2003/04 June 2003 |
||||||||||
LL |
Develop a homework club program for the City’s libraries |
Reduction in antisocial behaviour through the provision of a public library based program of supervision and help with homework assignments
|
Program developed Sep 02 |
Discussions will be held with local primary schools. Proposal will be formalised and contract staff appointed Dec 02 for the program to run during terms 1&2 200
|
Program will commence second week of term 1 2003 |
|
||||||||||
MS |
Develop a directory of Council services and facilities for community distribution |
Increase in awareness of Council services & facilities available to the community |
Designed directory, obtained approvals Aug 02. Provided draft to management Sep 02. Sourced new photos for directory Sep 02
Council Services Directory delivered to all residents and businesses within the City. Sep 02.
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||||||||
MS & CDD |
Redevelop Council’s website to be an interactive communication tool for the community including a Community Development web page link |
Development of web page as a key communication tool
Promotion of web page as a source of council information
|
Increased resources for Graphic Design area currently being finalised.
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
CDD |
Develop a Community Information Database. |
Community information database operational and accurate source of community group information for internal and external customers |
Commence development of information database Aug/Sep 02 |
Develop and implement mechanisms to obtain and maintain community group details Oct/Nov 02 |
Information database developed and operational Dec/Jan 03
Develop with Marketing Services, marketing plan to promote availability of service to residents Feb 03
Development of procedure manual Feb/Mar 03
|
|
||||||||||
Strategic Objective 2.5: Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity. |
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Project: HERITAGE, CONSERVATION & COMMUNITY IDENTITY
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|
||||
LL |
Record a living history of the City of Wanneroo Develop a Wanneroo Local Studies Collection to record key events, activities and projects related to the new City of Wanneroo |
Cultural and documentary heritage of the City of Wanneroo collected, organised, displayed and preserved |
Commenced development of Local Studies collection Aug 02 Increase Heritage officer hrs Aug 02 Plan Living History project Sep 02
|
Commence Living History project Dec 02 |
|
|
|
||||
CS |
Develop mechanisms to ensure the views of young people are considered in Council decision making processes
|
Development of framework that allows for the meaningful consideration of youth views in council decision making processes
|
Policy developed
|
Seek Council endorsement Oct 02. |
|
|
|
||||
CS |
Implement a range of services that meet the needs of young people in the community |
Development of: -Extreme sports programme, Young Photographer’s Competition, Hip Hop program, Urban Art Project, Clarkson Skate Park, Dance Parties, Warhammer Central Ward, Camps for Youth at Risk, Urban Art Project, Underage Dance Event, Management Plan for Clarkson Youth Centre, Operating Budget Media Centre |
Commencement of the following:
-Camps for youth at risk held in Sep 02 -Dance Parties held in Wanneroo Sep 02
|
Commencement of the follwing:
-Hip Hop program Banksia Grove, Wanneroo, Girrawheen and Koondoola, -Extreme Sports Series in Clarkson, Quinns and Wanneroo Nov 02 -Warhammer program, Wanneroo & Clarkson to start Oct 02. -Consultations for Clarkson Skate Park Stage 2 Nov/Dec02 -Draft Clarkson Youth Centre Management for consideration Nov 02. |
Photographers competition to commence early 2003 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||
CDD |
Develop and implement an events and arts strategy for the City, based on key themes identified in the Strategic Plan and incorporating milestones including the centenary of Local Government in Wanneroo
Develop a Cultural Plan for the City in partnership with CANWA.
|
Community Events Plan
Cultural Plan |
Budget allocated for Community Events Plan 2002/2003
Ideas for Cultural Plan currently being developed.
|
Launch of Spring Fest at Gloucester Lodge 6th October 2002 |
|
|
|||||
Strategic Objective 2.4: Support safe and secure communities |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Project: SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM
|
||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||
RS |
Continue to operate and evaluate the City’s Safety and Security Program consisting of:
|
Number of Safer Citizen events held
Performance of Safer Citizens patrol service
Implementation of urban design projects Participation in community events
Analysis of community surveys addressing perception of safety and security
Increase community perception of increased safety from annual community survey
|
The first of 14 programmed safer citizens community event ‘Wild Things’ successfully conducted 22/9/02
Preliminary estimates have been received from consultant for urban design projects.
Project Officer for Safer Citizen’s commenced duty 23/9/02.
Finalised questions in Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey to measure Community’s perception of safety and security.
|
Performance of the Safer Citizens Patrols will be outlined in the quarterly report to be submitted to the working group in October’02
Progress report will be provided to the Safer Citizen’s Working Group meeting 22/10/02 |
|
|
||
RS |
Implement the outcomes of a review of the delivery of fire services across the City, in partnership with the Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) and the community.
|
More effective and efficient Fire Service with increased volunteer participation. Increased community awareness of fire safety issues |
Voluntary Fire Brigade currently has a waiting list of volunteers.
MOU with FESA signed 1/7/02
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||
RS |
Develop a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) database for review of infrastructure requirements for safety and security |
Database for Safety and Security requirements for consideration in future development structure plans.
|
New Safer Citizens Program Project Officer commenced 23/9/02.
|
|
The development of the database will be finalised by 31/3/03
|
|
||
RS |
Develop and assess a trial outpost for the provision of limited Ranger Services at Two Rocks Police Station |
Level of usage compared to number of hours provided. |
The Police have indicated acceptance of this proposal.
|
|
Business Unit will be working towards commencement of outpost Ranger service. Jan 03.
|
|
||
Planning and Development |
||||||
|
||||||
Strategic Objectives 2.2: Provide a cohesive system of integrated land use and planning |
||||||
|
||||||
Project: HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INITATIVES |
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
AS |
Conduct monitoring and management programme for the control of midge |
Minimise the number of incidents reported
|
Monitoring of Midge Larvae numbers for the current season commenced on 9/7/02 and has shown numbers increasing steadily with no indication of any naturally occurring decline in breeding rates.
Treatment identified. Early treatment commenced 29/8/02 to accommodate weather conditions and unseasonal breeding. Monitoring to continue to assess the timing of further treatments this season Information Evening for residents held on 23 September. Approx, 80 residents attended this evening and the City reported on the current results and previous season’s findings. |
. |
|
|
3.Economic
Development
Planning and Development |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Strategic Objective 3.1: Create an Economic Development Strategy |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Project: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
ED |
Prepare an economic plan addressing issues including:
|
Develop an Economic Development Plan for the 6 sectors of the Wanneroo economy |
Developed a template for stakeholder consultation |
Commence interviewing targeted businesses and agencies |
Commence preparation of document |
Have report ready for stakeholder approval |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Strategic Objective 3.1: Support employment growth within the community |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Project: EMPLOYMENT GENERATION INITIATIVES |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
ED |
Prepare employment policy/strategy addressing issues including, eg.
|
Prepare report for Council of draft strategy Community consultation Report to Council of final strategy |
Gathered research from various sources |
Planning working party meeting to discuss preliminary findings |
Prepare findings in report. |
Community consultation to commence. |
|||||||||
ED |
Investigate new technologies to maximise business opportunity |
Creation of a new skills base that directly boosts local employment content |
Assisted in the development of 2Cities portal website |
|
Monitor progress and effectiveness of working website for small business enhancement |
|
|||||||||
Strategic Objective 3.4: Support a viable rural industry |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Project: BUSINESS SUPPORT INITATIVES |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
PS |
Review and finalise Local Rural Strategy (LRS). |
Preparation of a report for Council’s consideration
Completion of community consultation (if required)
|
Agreement with Minister for Planning & Infrastructure to establish Wanneroo water management policy |
Committees to be established by WAPC |
Present report on draft LRS to Council |
Present report to Council on final LRS (if required) |
|||||||||
PS/ED |
Examine opportunities to facilitate tourism development through Local Rural Strategy |
Preparation of a report for Council’s consideration
|
Town Committee established |
|
|
|
|||||||||
ED |
Hold a forum/workshop with local industry to explore opportunities associated with the development of a Wanneroo brand |
Strategy to enhance selling opportunities and export competitiveness of growers |
Establish contact & begin meeting with groups. |
Evaluation of needs to commence. |
Develop strategy to help growers (if required) |
Facilitate new alliances/partnerships for groups (if required) Assist with funding opportunities.
|
|||||||||
Strategic Objective1: Develop the tourism industry. |
|||||||||||||||
Project: TOURISM DEVELOPMENT INITATIVES |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
MS |
Work in conjunction with the Sunset Coast Tourism Association to develop a map to promote tourism within the City of Wanneroo |
Greater awareness of tourism within the City of Wanneroo |
Wanneroo Tourism Committee being formed. City tourism promotion to be formulated in consultation with committee. Association progressing tourism promo document for region. |
|
|
|
|||||||||
4.Corporate Management and Development
|
|
||||||
Strategic Objective 4.1: Review and develop policies covering governance and management of our City |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Project: CORPORATE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK |
|
||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|
ES |
Develop, implement and monitor a corporate research strategy for the City, including:
|
Development of an Annual Customer Survey which provides information to all business units of service satisfactions and provides the basis on continual service improvement.
Cost effective market research strategy for the organisation
An increase level of understanding of our customer needs
|
Appointed Strategic Planner Jul 02
Engaged market research firm to conduct Annual Customer Survey and Mystery Shopper Sep 02
Developed strategy for recruitment of Household Panel as part of the Corporate Research Strategy in consultation with market research firm Sep 02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
IT |
Develop and implement an Information Technology Strategic Plan to coordinate and provide consistency in the acquisition and development of systems that provides a desktop environment to meet the business needs of the organisation |
A roadmap for the implementation of information technology that supports the City’s business objectives
|
Scope of plan determined June 02
Plan written. August 02 |
Seek Comment December 02 |
Seek adoption of Plan by EMT/Council Dec 02/Jan03 |
|
IT |
Support an efficient and cost effective communications network for radio and voice |
Reduction in helpdesk calls Progress of Operational Plan
|
Established a mechanism for identifying helpdesk calls attributable to lack of training. Aug 02
|
Benchmark current calls and develop a training plan Dec 02 |
Draft Plans Jan 03
Final Plans Mar 03 |
|
F |
Co-ordinate budget process for all Directorates to ensure it’s driven by strategic plans |
Adoption of budget Appointment of Budget staff |
Budget adopted at 19th July Special Council Meeting.
|
|
|
|
F |
Develop the Annual Budget and 4-year Capital Works Program for adoption |
Capital Works Program that is updated each year during the budget process with new projects in priority order
|
Developed as part of annual budget |
|
|
|
ES |
Develop a Quarterly Strategic Performance Report |
Organisational projects are aligned to the Strategic Plan Resources for managers to review and update progress and impact of strategic projects undertaken by the City. Elected members and public have information on strategic initiatives undertaken by City |
Reviewed all Unit plans Aug 02 Developed report template which was approved by EMT Sep 02 Coordinated data and reporting for report Aug/Sep 02 Produced draft report for comment Sept 02 |
|
|
|
Project: STYLE MANUAL |
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
MS |
Develop a style manual in consultation with the organisation
Standard procedures for marketing, communication and promotion of the City both in word and in image |
Improved awareness on responsibilities of Marketing & roles of each officer
Improved service provision to internal customers
Forward planning of Marketing involvement in corporate initiatives which require Marketing input
Maximisation of impact of Marketing efforts due to awareness of other business unit staff
|
Draft help topics Sept 02
Compiled a list of help topics, drafted text for a number of topics.
Memo sent to Directors requesting information re: upcoming marketing and graphics jobs. Spreadsheet compiled. |
Final version for approval by Manager & CEO Dec 02/Jan 03
|
Launch of manual Jan 03
Commence education & information sessions on manual’s use Feb 03 |
MS |
||||
Project: SERVICE AGREEMENTS |
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
CP |
Identify opportunities to introduce centralised purchasing |
Identification of areas requiring the implementation of a centralised purchasing system |
Attended workshops with City of Stirling and City of Joondalup to investigate viable opportunities and formation of a working group to coordinate cross Council efforts. |
|
|
|
||||
Strategic Objective 4.3: Establish an organisation that is open accountable and committed to customer service |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Project: STAFF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM |
||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
||||
CEO |
Foster a culture of innovation through the development of innovation forums |
Organisation that is committed to continuous improvement and innovation
|
Launched Innovation Program, held a series of staff information sessions with 90% staff attendance.
|
|
|
|
||||
SE |
Develop a Total Customer Care Plan |
Customer Care Plan endorsed by Council and promoted to wider community as a tool to improve services and standards.
Improved culture of customer service. Consistency and excellence in customer service standards
|
Staff Focus Group established.
Workshop scheduled to be held with customer service consultant Ed Black.
|
|
|
|
||||
CDD |
Undertake a customer driven review of community events |
Appropriate data obtained to assess improvements to Community Events Program |
Questionnaire developed Sept 02
Provided input for community events based questions in Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey
|
Questionnaires distributed and data obtained at selected community events from Oct 02 to Apr 03
|
Event evaluation and suggested improvements to FACE committee as input for 2003/04 calendar of events March 03 |
|
||||
Corporate Services |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
Strategic Objective 4.1: Review and develop policies covering governance and management of our city |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
Project: STRATEGIC PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PLAN |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|
|||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|
||||||||
CR |
Integrate payroll functions with Human Resources functions |
Identify and implemented efficiencies/improvements to streamline processes, increase productivity time and enhance communication within the team
|
Implemented new Leave form to replace four forms to improve efficiency.
Monthly reporting to Managers integrated and improvements to leave reports.
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
CR |
Further develop and promote the City’s Traineeship Program |
Enhancing employment opportunities within local government
|
Developed work experience programme linked to Traineeship program for high schools. Five students from Wanneroo Senior High School received work experience during October school holidays. Two replacement indigenous trainees recruited for Community Development. Other three Trainees progressing well. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
CR |
Develop and implement an annual employee attitude survey |
40% survey response rate. Develop focus group for benchmarking |
Currently under development |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Strategic Objective 1: Establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Project: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
CR |
Implement a new Human Resource Performance Management System |
Employees and management have a process that is fair and objective in evaluating performance linked to the Strategic Plan
|
Conducted Managers’, Team Leaders, Supervisors and Employee Focus Groups which included a SWOT analysis of current system
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Project: ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
1.1.1.1.1.1 PROGRESS |
||||||||||||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
|||||||||
CR |
Implement the new electronic document management system |
PowerDocs implemented with minimal disruption to productivity time of users
Quality assured written procedures that meet ISO 15489
|
File Plan, procedures and training have been completed for three Directorates (Office of the CEO, Corporate Services and Planning and Development).
Circulated survey to the three Directorates to measure if implementation was effective and meeting service standards
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
PROGRESS |
|||
BU |
Project |
Target 02/03 |
September 02 |
December 02 |
March 03 |
June 03 |
CR |
Review and document records systems and procedures to a quality assurance standard |
Records Services will have quality assured procedures and work instructions to ensure a consistent and standard format are followed for processing corporate information
|
Record Keeping Plan developed and procedures identified to be established. |
|
|
|
CEO / ES |
Implement the City’s Action Request system |
Improved response time to actions and complaints
An accountable and timely tracking system for Council’s Action request and complaints
|
Training sessions held, were well attended by staff.
193 requests received 186 (92.7%) responded to in specified time. |
|
|
|
BU |
Policy/Statement/Framework/Plan |
Drafted |
Reviewed |
Adopted |
Comments |
PS |
Commitment to Healthy Communities Statement |
|
|
|
|
SE |
Draft Community Consultation Policy |
Sept 02 |
|
|
Report to be presented at 15/10/02 Council Meeting
|
SE |
Draft Corporate Research Framework |
Dec 02 |
|
|
Currently being drafted
|
ED |
Economic Development Strategy |
|
|
|
Proposed survey presented to Consultation review panel 3/10/02
|
SE |
Total Quality Customer Care Plan |
|
|
|
Work group being established.
|
PD |
Conservation Management Plan |
|
|
|
Working Group set up to develop content of plan.
|
LL |
Trails Master Plan |
|
|
|
|
CDD |
Community Profiles |
|
|
|
Tables using first release Census data have been generated.
|
RS |
Local Emergency Management Plan |
|
|
|
|
CS |
Disability Services Plan |
|
|
|
|
CS |
Multicultural Services Plan |
|
|
|
|
LL |
Heritage services and Facilities Plan |
|
|
|
|
MS |
Style Manual |
2003 |
|
|
Help topics complied, content being drafted
|
MS |
Council Directory of Services |
Aug 02 |
|
|
Directory completed and circulated to staff elected members and community
|
BU BU |
Key Corporate Indicators |
Target |
This quarter |
Comments |
CR |
Staff Turnover |
Baseline data to be developed |
2% |
10 resignations |
AS |
Building licences determined |
1,480 |
1,550 |
Applications determined are an excellent result given staff on leave during July/August period and two Building Surveyor positions being vacant.
|
AS |
Number of development applications determined |
160 |
196 |
Applications determined are a good result given an increasing trend of applications received.
|
ES |
Percentage of Action Requests responded to within time frame |
Baseline data to be developed |
92.7% |
186 action requests received in the period from 1/8/02 to 27/9/02 |
SE |
Lot sales |
N/A |
663 |
Represents 39.2% of all lots sold in Perth Metro in 02 June Qtr
|
MS |
Number of media exposures |
N/A* |
71 |
|
MS |
Number of media statements released |
60 |
72 |
|
CR |
Lost time due to injuries |
N/A |
614 hrs |
2 Workers Compensation Claims still pending Insurer’s decision to accept or reject. This may effect next quarters training.
|
WS |
Recycling tonnage |
N/A* |
410 |
Tonnes delivered by Wanneroo residents
|
WS |
Mulch production |
N/A* |
220 |
Tonnes of greens mulched
|
CS |
Number of HACC clients |
N/A* |
827 |
Increase from 810 mid 2002
|
CS |
Number of youth activities |
N/A* |
12 |
12 programmes currently being operated, programmes operate in different locations in the City, hence the number of activities is higher (approx 25) and the numbers of occurrences of these activities are higher again.
|
Corporate Scorecard
*Denotes that there is no set target for this item
Capital Works
Project Number |
Project Name |
Project Description |
Construction Status |
Remarks |
||
Start |
Completion
|
Progress
|
||||
SHARED PATHWAYS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3231 |
Yellagonga Regional Park |
Extend DUP in Yellgonga Regional Park in accordance with management plan from a point 400m North of Church Street to Neville Drive |
Jul-2002 |
Aug-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
1505 |
Yanchep Two Rocks |
DUP and foreshore management |
|
|
|
Subject to review of foreshore management plan |
2166 |
Perth Bicycle Grants |
Replace DUP in Beach Road, Girrawheen |
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
2167 |
Lithgow Drive - DUP |
DUP construction |
|
|
100 |
Complete |
3232 |
Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Construct DUP on west side, from existing DUP at the end of Somerville Waters estate to Wallawa St. |
Sep-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3233 |
Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo - median connections |
Construction of pedestrian crossings in the median and median footpath links at 10 locations |
|
|
|
Subject to approval by MRWA of design drawings, incorporating tactiles for visually impaired. |
3234 |
Wanneroo Road, Girrawheen |
Construct DUP on east side from existing DUP (Sth of Templeton Way to Warwick Rd Int) |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Works commencing 18 Nov 2002 subject to MRWA approval of Traffic Management Plans |
FOOTPATHS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3190 |
Hazel Ave, Quinns |
Robinson to Ashley Drive (375m) |
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Subject to Water Corporation Works |
3191 |
Kemp St, Quinns |
Construct 1.5m footpath from Ocean Dr to Hazel Ave - (115m) |
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Subject to Water Corporation Works |
3196 |
Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Gungurru to Bus Stop (323m) |
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3185 |
Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Construct 1.5m footpath from Ocean Reef Rd to bus stop (Eastern Side) |
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
2156 |
Mangano Place, Wanneroo |
Construction of footpath |
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3175 |
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo |
Replace slab footpath with in situ concrete footpath west of 60 Dundebar Road |
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3177 |
Hastings Street, Wanneroo |
Replace slab footpath with 1.5m in situ concrete footpath between Wanneroo Rd and Keane St |
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3176 |
Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Replace slab footpath with 2.1m in situ concrete footpath East side - north of St Anthony School |
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3188 |
Daniel Way, Wanneroo |
Provide 1.5m wide footpath on eastern side (possible safe route to school)
|
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
71 |
Warwick Place - Girrawheen |
Upgrading of slab footpaths to 1.5m in-situ concrete standard footpaths |
Oct-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
|
Works in progress |
3172 |
Mereworth Place - Girrawheen |
Upgrading of slab footpaths to 1.5m in-situ concrete standard footpaths |
Oct-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
|
Works in progress |
3186 |
Shortland Way, Girrawheen |
1.5m wide pathlink from Wanneroo Road to Shortland Way (162m) |
|
|
|
In conjunction with Project Number 3234 |
3173 |
Nanovich Avenue - Girrawheen |
Upgrading of slab footpaths to 1.5m in-situ concrete standard footpaths |
Nov-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
|
|
3174 |
Hollingsworth Avenue - Koondoola |
Upgrading of slab footpaths to 2.1m in-situ concrete standard footpaths |
Nov-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
|
|
3178 |
Footpaths Replacement |
Replace slab footpath with 1.5m in situ concrete footpath - small sections in six streets |
Nov-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
|
|
3179 |
Footpaths Replacement |
Replace
slab paths in Public Access Ways with in situ concrete paths in Wanneroo |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
|
3189 |
Lakelands Rd, Gnangara |
Construct 1.8m footpath on northern side of Lakelands Rde between Sydney Road and Clubhouse Lane (530m) |
Dec-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
|
3183 |
Sydney Road, Landsdale |
Construct 1.8m footpath in PAW |
Dec-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
|
3184 |
McClintock Parkway, Alexander Heights |
Construct 2.1m footpath from Greenpark Rd to Fenchurch Rd (316m) |
Jan-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
2149 |
Princeton Circle, Alex Hts |
Construction of footpath |
Jan-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
3193 |
Honours Rise, Marangaroo |
Construct footpath in Honours Rise from existing path outside lot 256 through PAW to existing path outside lot 166 Gaby St. (63m) |
Jan-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
2521 |
Marangaroo Park |
Construction of footpath |
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
|
3198 |
Baltimore Parade, |
Extend footpath on eastern side from Palermo Crt to Jenolan Way |
Feb-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
|
3192 |
Aldersea Circle, Clarkson |
Construct 1.5m wide path from Hurst Trail to roundabout @ Renshaw school crossing - 100m |
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
|
3182 |
Trotman Crescent, Yanchep |
Construct 1.5m footpath from Kaiber Ave to Wilkie Ave - Wheel chair access |
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
|
3187 |
St Andrews Drive, Yanchep |
1.5m wide footpath to Sun City Country Club (509m) |
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
|
3194 |
Fawkner Road, Two Rocks |
Construct 1.5m footpath in Fawkner Rd between Blaxland Avenue and cul-de-sac.(500m) |
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
|
3195 |
Whitfield Drive, Two Rocks |
Continue footpath in Whitfield Way West (Stage 2- 350m) |
Feb-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
|
|
3181 |
Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks |
3
Sections 1.5m wide - |
Feb-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
Subject to completion of sewer |
2522 |
Public Access Way Upgrade |
|
|
|
|
Subject to investigation and design |
BUS SHELTERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3205 |
New Bus Shelter Installation Program |
Installation of new bus shelters as part of the DPI (Dept of Planning & Infrastructure) Bus Shelter Grant Scheme - Year 2 of a Four Year Program |
|
|
|
Subject to detailed design and approval by DPI |
STORMWATER DRAINAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2171 |
Yellangonga Rg Stmwater No12 |
|
|
Nov-2002 |
65 |
Works to recommence November 2002 |
3121 |
Burt Street Sump - Drainage Upgrade Quinns Rocks |
Upgrading of existing sump, Pump Station Installation and associated works |
Sep-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Tenders being analysed |
1233 |
Stormwater Drainage Upgrade |
Ongoing works |
|
|
|
Ongoing projects |
3122 |
Ridgewood Park, Ridgewood |
Upgrade works to Lake , possible installation of Gross Pollutant Trap. |
Jan-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Subject to detailed investigation |
PARKING FACILTIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1507 |
Long Beach Prom Car Pk |
Removal of access road and rehabilitation |
|
|
|
Subject to review of foreshore management plan |
3161 |
Wanneroo City Soccer Club, Kingsway Sports Complex, Madeley - Car Park Lighting |
Install car park lighting |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Quotations being invited |
3162 |
Gumblossum Reserve (Community Centre), Quinns Rocks |
Provide further parking facilities to meet current demand. Extension of existing carpark by 40 extra bays northwest towards bowling club.
|
Mar-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Subject to Gumblossom Reserve Master Plan |
ROADWORKS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1153 |
Land Acquisitions |
Land acquisitions for road projects |
|
|
|
Subject to preparation of Land requirement drawings |
2130 |
Franklin Rd High/Dundebar |
Shoulder reconstruction Works
|
|
Jul-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3106 / 1158 |
Quinns Rocks Streets |
Road
Upgrading Works in |
Jul-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
80 |
Major Works complete. Final layer of asphalt and verge restoration currently in progress |
2111 |
Hester Avenue |
Marmion
Ave to Hidden Valley Retreat (including Street Lighting and Landscaping)
|
Apr-2002 |
Feb-2003 |
50 |
Works in progress |
3103 |
Mirrabooka Avenue |
Beach
Road to Marangaroo Drive
|
Apr-2003 |
Jul-2003 |
|
Stage 2 to be funded in 2003/04 |
3116 |
Skiet Road |
Road Upgrade works |
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Works commenced 21 October 2002 and are in progress |
3104 |
Adams Road, Mariginiup |
Upgrade road to sealed standard
|
Dec-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
3105 |
Reinhold Place, Carabooda |
Upgrade road to sealed standard
|
Dec-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
3102 |
MLRP Improvement Project - Mirrabooka Avenue |
Dual carriageway construction from Marangaroo Drive to Berkley Road (Stage 1)
|
Apr-2003 |
Aug-2003 |
|
MLRF committed for 2003/04 |
2112 |
Hester Avenue |
Construction of Underpass
|
|
|
100 |
Complete |
ROAD RESURFACING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3111 |
MLRF Road Rehabilitation Programme |
Resurfacing
of roads as recommended and approved for Metropolitan Local Road Funding |
Jan-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
Buckingham Dr - Works subject to recommendations of Wangara Parking Study and Federal Black Spot Project (Refer Project Number 3218) |
2126 |
Franklin Road, Wanneroo |
Road resurfacing |
|
|
70 |
Further works in conjunction with Intersection upgrade works at High Road and Trichet Road (refer Project No 3217)
|
2129 / 3115 |
Road Resurfacing Programme |
Resurfacing of various roads as recommended by the ROMANS pavement management system and detailed investigations
|
Nov-2002 |
Apr-2003 |
10 |
Skiet Road works currently progressing |
STREET LIGHTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2178 |
Hepburn Ave - Street Lighting |
|
|
|
|
In conjunction with Hepburn Ave Roadworks contract |
3126 |
Hepburn Avenue - Giralt Road to Mirrabooka Avenue |
Provision of street lighting utilising 250w HPS luminaires on steel poles with underground power. Illumination to full standard.
|
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
In conjunction with Hepburn Ave Roadworks contract |
3127 |
Mirrabooka Ave - Heathfield Drive to Gnangara Road (Stage 1) |
Provision of street lighting utilising 250w luminaires on steel poles with underground power. (illumination at INTERSECTIONS to full standard)
|
Mar-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
Subject to Design and approval by Western Power |
3128 |
Various roads/streets - street lighting. |
Installation of street lighting subject to extension of arterial & sub - arterial road network .
|
Sep-2002 |
Mar-2003 |
20 |
In accordance with the priority listing |
3129 |
Drovers Place, Wanneroo |
Provision of street lighting utilising 125W MV luminaires on single outreach steel standard poles with underground power. Illumination to full standard.
|
Jan-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Subject to Design and approval by Western Power |
BLACK SPOT PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3211 |
Mirrabooka
Ave Montrose Ave / |
Upgrade Mirrabooka Ave to provide two lane approach, modify central rotary island, revamp roundabout and approaches
|
Mar-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
10 |
Design and documentation nearing completion |
3212 |
Highclere Blvd |
Install pedestrian refuges, traffic islands and painted medians, install additional lighting, ban parking near roundabout
|
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Works commencing 5 Nov 2002 |
3213 |
Wanneroo Rd / Villanova St Intersection |
Provide left slip lane on Wanneroo Rd, install seagull in median
|
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Subject to approval by MRWA |
3214 |
Beach Rd / Alexander Dr Intersection |
Extend left turn lanes, install new left turn islands, install kerb ramps and grab rails for pedestrians/cyclists, relocate traffic signal boxes
|
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
Joint funding with City of Swan |
3215 |
Wanneroo Rd / Elliot Rd Intersection |
Widen Elliot Rd for a left slip lane, install seagull island in the median
|
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Subject to pole relocation by Western Power and approval by MRWA |
3216 |
Pinjar Rd / Clarkson Ave Intersection |
Provide left slip lane, widen Pinjar Rd to provide overtaking opportunities
|
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Subject to pole relocation by Western Power |
3217 |
Franklin Road |
From High Road to Trichet Rd - provide left turn slip into High Rd and right turn slip into Trichet Rd; widen shoulders and clear zone; possible lighting improvements
|
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
In conjunction with Project No 2126 |
3218 |
Buckingham Drive |
Provide red asphalt and median linemarking; Provide priority control where needed
|
|
|
|
Subject to Wangara Parking Study and in conjunction with Project Nos 3276 and 2190 |
3219 |
Intersection - Lenore Rd and Ocean Reef Rd |
Define intersection more clearly by providing right turn slip lane; left out of Lenore Rd into Ocean Reef; lengthen left into Lenore road; re-align Lenore Road to Mary St Intersection
|
|
|
|
PROJECT NOT APPROVED UNDER FEDERAL BLACK SPOT PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT / STREETSCAPE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3256 |
Marangaroo Traffic Management |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority
order
Rawlinson Drive - Median island Treatments and Landscaping (70,000) |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Works commencing 5 Nov 2002 in Highclere Boulevard in conjunction with Project No 2184 |
3256 / 2184 |
Marangaroo Traffic Management
|
Highclere Blvd |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Works commencing 5 Nov 2002 in conjunction with Project No 3256 |
3131/3132 |
New North Redevelopment, in association with Homeswest
|
Streetscape and traffic management in Montrose Avenue |
Oct-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
40 |
Works in progress |
3131/3133 |
New North Redevelopment, in association with Homeswest
|
Streetscape and traffic management in Burbridge Ave |
Jun-2003 |
Jul-2003 |
|
Subject to funding approval by Ministry for Housing |
3266 |
Alexander Heights Traffic Management |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority
order
Hillcrest Road - Roundabout at Adria Road (75,000)
|
Feb-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
|
|
3281 |
School Safety |
Provision
of Carparking and Traffic Management for vulnerable road users outside
schools - - 50/50 with EDWA |
Jan-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
School holidays - Subject to funding from EDWA |
3271 / 2189 |
Quinns Traffic Management |
Tapping Way
|
|
|
|
Subject to finalisation of Traffic Study |
3251 |
East Wanneroo Traffic Management |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority order |
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
|
3251 / 2194 |
East Wanneroo Traffic Management |
Karimba Street |
Feb-2003 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Subject to finalisation of scope of works with community and MRWA |
3261 |
West Wanneroo Traffic Management |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority
order
Neville Drive - Intersection treatments at Taywood Drive, Thompson Drive and
Scenic Drive (45,000) |
Mar-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
40 |
Neville Drive works complete other that pavement markings |
3261 / 2182 |
West Wanneroo TMS |
Frederick Street |
Mar-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
|
Subject to finalisation of scope of works with community and MRWA
|
3271 |
Quinns Traffic Management |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority
order
Coastal Rise (now known as Tapping Way Service Road) - Upgrade Intersection,
make one - way; Check drainage and undertake Community Consultation (15,000) |
Apr-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
|
3285 |
Miscellaneous Traffic Management |
Various
TMS subject to Council approval
|
Apr-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
|
3276 |
Wangara Parking Study |
Works
as recommended by Traffic Study in the following priority order |
Nov-2002 |
May-2003 |
|
Subject to recommendations of Working group review of Wangara Parking Study |
3276 / 2190 |
Wangara Parking Study |
Works as per Traffic Study recommendations |
May-2003 |
May-2003 |
|
|
COASTAL / FORESHORE MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2195 |
Quinns Beach Emergency Erosion |
Coastal Protection Study 2002 |
Feb-2002 |
Sep-2003 |
100 |
Final report approved by Council on 3 September 2002 |
2196 |
Quinns Beach Emergency Coastal Protection Works |
Works undertaken during July 2002 |
Jun-2002 |
Jul-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
2505 |
Two Rocks Beach Access |
Construction of Timber Stairway Access to beach |
Sep-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
25 |
Contract Works in progress |
1510 |
The Spot, Two Rocks. |
Rehabilitation of access track and parking |
|
|
|
Ongoing subject to community assistance |
2506 |
The Spot Coastcare Project |
Construction of Toilets |
Nov-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Quotation process |
1506 |
Limestone Cliff Protect. |
|
Sep-2002 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Ongoing project subject to DPI approval |
1502 |
Coastal Safety Audit |
Various works |
Sep-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Ongoing Project |
3166 |
Mindarie Foreshore |
Upgrade boardwalk and fencing at Clarecastle - Lot 211 |
Jan-2003 |
Feb-2003 |
|
Under investigation / Design |
3201 |
Quinns Beach Protection Works |
Construction of groynes/headlands - subject to funding by State Government |
Sep-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Tenders
being evaluated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSERVATION RESERVES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3501 |
Lake Gnangara Lake reserve |
Upgrade of Lake Gnangara Conservation area as outlined in the Management Strategies (Stage 2). |
|
|
|
Subject to approval under Section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act |
3502 |
Develop Rehabilitation Demonstration site |
Develop
rehabilitation demonstration site |
Oct-2002 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Scoping of works to include rehabilitation, weed control, revegetation and interpretive signage highlighting environmental/conservation site. |
3503 |
Conservation Signage |
Signage
for conservation area : |
Dec-2002 |
Mar-2003 |
|
Conservation signage on indicated reserves to control dogs, no wildflower picking and removal of firewood. Currently scoping works in conjunction with generic signage. |
3504 |
Marangaroo Reserve path |
Upgrade of pedestrian trails in Marangaroo conservation area |
Nov-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Preparing contract documentation. |
3505 |
Montrose Park, Girrawheen |
Replacement path through bushland as per Conservation Plan 1995 |
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Preparing contract documentation. |
2501 |
Lake Gnangara Park |
Subject to recommendations of Management Plan |
|
|
|
Subject to approval under Section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act |
PARKS FURNITURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3521 |
Senior Playground Equipment Upgrade Programme -Swanley Park |
Swanley
Park |
Aug-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
20 |
Order number issued to Forpark to start within two weeks |
3522 |
Hainsworth Pre Primary, Girrawheen - Replacement of playground equipment |
Replacement of Junior Unit : Existing does not conform to Australian Standards |
Apr-2003 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Works in conjunction with Hainsworth Leisure Centre Refurbishment works |
3523 |
Junior Playground Equipment Upgrade Programme - Goolema Park, Lake Gnangara Park East and Dunmore Park |
PRIORITY
ORDER: |
Aug-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
20 |
Order number issued to Forpark to start within two weeks |
3524 |
Banyandah Park, Play Equipment |
Replacement play equipment, new jarrah-slat seats and drinking fountain.
|
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
20 |
Order number issued to Forpark to start within two weeks |
3525 |
Safety edging to playground softfall. |
Marangaroo Park, Hudson Park, Paloma Park, Curtis Park, Adora Park, Montrose Tennis, Neville Park, Barndie Park, Taywood Park, Wonambi Park, Amery Park, Banyandah Park, Frederick Duffy Park, Frederick Stubbs Park, Littleham Park, Dalvik Park
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Contractor to start approximately 6 November at Shamrock and working south. |
3526 |
Park benches |
Josephine Park x1, Adora Park x 1, Alexander Heights Park x 4, various replacements x 5 |
Aug-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
30 |
Park Benches delivered. Replacement list complete. Installation by Parks Operations to begin mid November
|
3534 |
Upgrade and or Supply BBQ (Electrical) to parks |
Fishermans Hollow, Rotary Park are all old units which are well used, but brickwork and cooking tops are in bad state needing replacement. Studmaster is a new park with tourist attraction lookout, etc. will enhance its appeal. |
Sep-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
10 |
Investigations into refurbishment versus replacement. |
2511 |
Hainsworth Kindy playground equipment |
|
Apr-2003 |
Jun-2003 |
0 |
Works in conjunction with Hainsworth Leisure Centre Refurbishment works |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOLF COURSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3506 |
Safety Improvements to Chemical Handling |
Install 2 emergency rinse showers to improve safety levels at the golf courses in case of accidental exposure to chemicals (@ $1,500ea). Install shelving to chemical sheds to improve chemical storage and handling (@ $2,000ea). |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
10 |
Investigations completed. Currently at design stage which should be available by Friday 1 November |
3507 |
Marangaroo Golf Course - Fencing to driving range. |
Erection of additional fence at the Marangaroo driving range to prevent balls entering private property. Safety issue, prevention of damage to property. |
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3508 |
Marangaroo Golf Course |
Replacement of deteriorated viewing platforms (safety issue). |
Aug-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
80 |
Two platforms replaced -review of need to install additional platforms for course safety |
LANDSCAPING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3511 |
Quinns Road |
Landscaping Stage 1 Works, Marmion Ave to Seaham Dr |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Currently at design stage. |
3512 |
Aquamotion car park and gardens |
Upgrade landscaping |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Investigations complete. Irrigation salvage works undertaken. Design completed. Currently preparing for quotation. |
3513 |
Alexander Heights Community Buildings |
Landscape area to south adjoining the central pathway |
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Investigations completed. Currently at design stage. |
3514 |
Archer
Street Landscaping |
Landscaping of Archer Street Pearsal, transplanting of exotic trees and installation of paving treatment. |
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
5 |
Investigations completed. Community consultation completed. Quotations received and being assessed. |
3515 |
Marmion Avenue |
Anchorage Drive to Hester Ave - Median landscaping in conjunction with land development |
Jul-2002 |
Feb-2002 |
30 |
Investigations and design completed. Waiting on Developer to provide project start date which is estimated to be late December. |
2510 |
Hepburn Ave - eastern end |
Landscaping of southern verge |
Aug-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
2118 |
Marmion Avenue - Landscaping |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
35 |
Irrigation installation started 28 October 2002 and programmed for completion by mid December |
PASSIVE PARKS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3531 / 3532 |
Passive Park Development Programme - Nannatee Park |
Upgrade of Nannatee Park |
Jul-2002 |
Jan-2002 |
25 |
Concrete footpath pegged and Contractor organised to start 8 November 2002, Bore complete |
2550 / 3531 |
Passive Park Development Programme - Ormiston Park |
Ormiston Park Redevelopment |
Jul-2002 |
Jan-2002 |
20 |
Investigations and design completed. Bore installation complete. Quotes being assessed for removal of grass trees. |
2551 / 3531 |
Passive Park Development Programme - Shamrock Park |
Shamrock Park Redevelopment |
Jul-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
40 |
Investigations and design completed. Bore installed. Concrete path will be completed by Friday 1 November. Limestone path completed. Western Power connection complete. Bore Cabinet installed. Irrigation installation started. |
1562 |
Play Area Mews Park |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Investigations complete. |
2521 |
Marangaroo Park |
Pathway |
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
0 |
|
2540 |
Bibbulmum Pk Play Area |
Irrigated grass area |
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
70 |
Irrigation installed. Power connected. Turf stolons to be installed as soon as irrigation is tested. |
2526 |
Aeration systems |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Under review |
Various |
Safer Citizen Projects |
|
Jul-2002 |
Mar-2003 |
5 |
Ferrara solar light ordered. Quote stage for Shamrock. Leemings Landing solar light in process of being ordered. |
W206 |
Wanneroo Townsite - Park |
Bert Togno Park (Stage 1)
|
|
|
100 |
Complete |
SPORTING FACILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3241 |
Netball court resurfacing - Kingsway Sporting Complex |
Upgrade 12 of the 54 courts by replacing the existing playing surface (asphalt) to an acrylic surface.
|
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Scope of work and specification being prepared for tendering |
3242 |
Montrose Park Tennis Courts - Tennis Court Resurfacing (2 courts) |
Resurfacing of Courts 3 and 4. Cracking in the playing surface as a result of roots penetrating the surface has resulted in clubs and casual user complaints regarding the quality of the surface.
|
Oct-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
3243 |
Hudson Park Tennis Courts - Tennis Court Resurfacing (2 courts) |
Two courts require resurfacing. Cracking in the playing surface has occurred over time requiring resurfacing to cater for casual tennis users. |
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
Report to Council on 5 November, re funding shortfall |
3541 |
Kingsway Sporting Complex extension to fencing around grounds adjacent to future extension of Hepburn Avenue. |
Due to the Hepburn Ave roadworks fencing will be required to safeguard users of the ground, prevent vehicular access onto the facility and protect passing motorists. |
Sep-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
|
In conjunction with Hepburn Ave contract works |
3542 |
Ridgewood Park - redevelopment works for senior users |
Amend existing infrastructure, level changes to the oval surface to meet senior play requirements and surface condition. Refurbishment of passive areas to improve health, safety and amenity of the park. Works include new bore and upgraded turf surface and irrigation system. - STAGE 1 |
Aug-2002 |
Jun-2003 |
5 |
Investigations completed. At Project Team stage. Concept being developed. |
3544 |
Quinns Rocks Sports Club |
New Lighting |
Jul-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
10 |
Poles ordered and Contractor commissioned. |
3545 |
Replacement of Hainsworth Park Cricket match Wicket and synthetic surface. |
Safety Issue, Concrete surface of match wicket is cracked and requires replacement. Unsafe for play. |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
80 |
Concrete installed, surface to be installed |
3545 |
Yanchep Sports Club |
New Lighting |
Jul-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
40 |
Electrical works installed. Works programmed for completion by 15 November |
3546 |
Replacement of concrete surface to the Cabrini Park Cricket practice nets. The new synthetic surface is in stock. |
Safety Issue, Concrete surface of practise wicket is cracked and requires replacement. Unsafe for play. |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
80 |
Concrete installed, surface to be installed |
3547 |
Sportsground Floodlights programme |
(1)
Edgar Griffiths Park - 2 poles with 4 luminaries as per policy. |
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Lighting
at John Moloney subject to electrical design and costings |
3548 |
Lighting at Wanneroo Showgrounds |
Carpark lighting and lighting of turf areas to assist in security and visibility during Wanneroo Show |
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
0 |
Subject to Wanneroo Town Centre Facility Plan, Parks Operations to supply transportable lights for this years show as an interim measure. |
1517 |
Irrigation Electrical Systems |
|
Sep-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
5 |
At investigation stage |
1800 |
Kingsway Master Plan |
|
|
|
0 |
Subject to review of infrastructure upgrade recommendations |
2527 |
Paloma Park Practice Wicket |
|
Sep-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
10 |
Installation to be installed starting 6 November to include concrete and fencing. |
2528 |
Belhaven Park, Quinns |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10 |
Location to be provided by Recreational Services. Installation will follow. |
2538 |
Oldham Reserve - Pole Lighting |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
0 |
On hold. Subject to further negotiations with Leisure Services and user group |
2553 |
Charnwood Reserve - Skate Park |
|
Jul-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
100 |
Complete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDINGS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2052 |
Alexander Heights Community Facility |
Development of a multi-purpose community facility |
Dec-2002 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Tender closes 12 November 2002 |
1019 |
Quinns Mindarie – Surf Life Amenity |
Development of Surf Life Saving Club. Funds to supplement 2001/02 allocation. |
May-2003 |
Nov-2003 |
|
MPS Architects preparing revised sketch plan for the Essential Services Building |
3001 |
Broadview Park - Toilet |
Basic toilet infrastructure to accommodate passive users. |
Mar-2003 |
Jul-2003 |
|
Project on site advertisement to be reported to the 26 November 2002 meeting of Council. |
3002 |
Gumblossom Community Hall |
Storage addition. |
Oct-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Construction work in progress |
3003 |
Kingsway Netball Courts - Toilet/Changerooms |
Toilet and changeroom infrastructure to accommodate netball including sewerage connection |
Mar-2003 |
Jul-2003 |
|
Submitted to WAPC for Development Approval |
3004 |
Paloma Park – Clubrooms / Function Area (STAGE 1) |
Storage Facility (Stage 1) |
Oct-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
10% |
Construction work in progress |
3005 |
Greenpark, Alexander Heights Storeroom Addition |
Storage infrastructure to accommodate local sports and passive use. (Stage 1) |
Oct-2003 |
Jan-2003 |
10% |
Construction work in progress |
3006 |
Girrawheen Library |
Refurbishment of existing building - plan and document construction and commence works |
Feb-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
|
Confirming works brief requirements in context of integrating and refurbishing the three on site facilities |
3007 |
Kingsway Sporting Complex - WPFC Stage 1 |
Redevelopment of Kingsway Football Facility to accommodate the West Perth Football Club, other sporting groups and community facilities - Stage 1 (to be funded over two years) |
|
|
|
Project not being pursued. |
W402 |
Wanneroo Townsite - Building |
|
Aug-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
50% |
Works in progress - Minor modifications |
3008 |
Asbestos Management Plan(W431) |
Asbestos Management Plan |
Jul-2002 |
Jun-2003 |
20% |
Ongoing |
1010 |
Ashby Depot Building |
Ashby Depot Building |
Oct-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
10% |
Tender closes 12 November 2002 |
2059 |
Depot-Fire Trans Off-Removal |
Remove from depot |
May-2003 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Awaiting completion of compound |
2054 |
Wanneroo Sports & Social Club |
|
May-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100% |
Complete |
2074 |
Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club |
Remove asbestos roof and replace with XSE |
Mar-2003 |
Apr-2003 |
|
|
2057 |
Aquamotion-Pool-Upg Blg Mtn |
Upgrade Building Management System |
Aug-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100% |
Complete |
2086 |
WWII Burma Campaign Memorial |
|
|
|
100% |
Complete |
2053 |
Girrawheen Snr Citizens Centre |
Lighten and brighten |
Aug-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
80% |
|
1014 |
Alexander Heights Playgroup |
|
Dec-2002 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Part of Project 2052 |
1011 |
Hainsworth Leisure Ctre |
|
Nov-2002 |
May-2003 |
|
Approval to engage a nominated contractor to be considered at the 5 November 2002 meeting of Council. |
2051 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Stage 2 |
|
|
|
100% |
Complete |
1022 |
Clarkson Public Library |
|
Mar-2003 |
Sep-2003 |
|
Confirmation being sought from Landcorp for site and building orientation with revised sketch plans |
1028 |
Gloucester Lodge |
|
Jul-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
75% |
Construction work in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W414 |
Bin Repair Facility |
Bin Repair Facility |
May-2003 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Identify scope before programming |
3009 |
Various Buildings Locks |
Re-keying of Buildings |
Aug-2002 |
May-2003 |
20% |
Ongoing |
1023 |
Rubbish Handling System |
|
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
80 |
Stage 2 of modifications being implemented |
2078 |
Carranmar Golf Course |
Alterations & Additions |
Oct-2002 |
Apr-2003 |
|
Contracts to be signed with Builder |
2079 |
Marangaroo Golf Course |
Alterations & Additions |
Oct-2002 |
Apr-2003 |
|
Contracts to be signed with Builder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDING MINOR WORKS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1010 |
Ashby Depot Building |
Provision Of Fire Appliance And Training Area |
Dec-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
Tenders advertised |
2816 |
Workshop Canopy Improvements |
Improvements to side of workshop canopy to make it fit for use in all weather |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
2819 |
Wanneroo Soccer Clubrooms |
Graffiti coating to outside walls |
|
|
100 |
Completed 01/02. Funds to be utilised for other works on clubrooms. |
2836 |
Shelving for Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
|
Subject to completion of Clarkson Library |
3551 |
LAKE GNANGARA PARK TOILETS/ CHANGEROOMS |
Assist with the cost of the demolition and removal of toilet block |
|
|
|
Awaiting further advice from Leisure Services |
3552 |
WANNEROO SHOWGROUNDS - TENNIS COURTS TOILETS |
Toilet block upgrade to increase opening hours and deter anti social behaviour |
Sep-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
3553 |
JOONDALUP PARK TOILETS/CHANGEROOMS
|
Toilet block upgrade to increase opening hours and deter anti social behaviour |
Sep-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
3554 |
LIDDELL PARK TOILETS/CHANGEROOMS |
Toilet block upgrade to increase opening hours and deter anti social behaviour |
Sep-2002 |
Sep-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
3801 |
Wanneroo Snr Cit Ctr-Aircon |
Install Airconditioning |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
50 |
|
3802 |
Gumblossom Toilets |
Install Metal Gates |
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
3803 |
Girrawheen/Koondoola Scout |
Install Airconditioning |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
40 |
|
3804 |
Girrawheen Snr Cit Ctr-Aircon |
Install Airconditioning |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
50 |
|
3805 |
Yanchep/Two Rocks Library |
Upgrade Airconditioning System |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
10 |
|
3806 |
Girrawheen Library-Aircon |
Install Aircondtioning |
|
|
|
Pending major upgrade of building |
3808 |
Aquamotion-Re-Config Piping |
Re-Configuration Of Piping |
May-2003 |
Jun-2003 |
|
Ongoing |
3810 |
Dog Pound - Refurbishment |
Refurbishment Of The Dog, Livestock And Vehicle Impound Area |
Oct-2002 |
May-2003 |
|
Brief finalised and works program being developed |
3811 |
Wanneroo Snr Cnt-Sec Screen |
Install Security Screen |
|
|
100 |
Completed 01/02. Funds to be utilised for other works on centre. |
3812 |
Depot Workshop 2 - Store Area |
Construct Store Area |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
100 |
Completed |
3813 |
Depot Workshop 2 - Storeroom |
Modifications To Storeroom |
Aug-2002 |
Dec-2002 |
60 |
|
3814 |
Depot-Irrigation Shd-Aircon |
Install Airconditioner |
Aug-2002 |
Nov-2002 |
50 |
|
3816 |
Elliot Park Clubrms-Roller Dr |
Install Roller Door |
|
|
100 |
Completed 01/02. Funds to be utilised for other works on clubrooms. |
3817 |
St Andrews Pk Tlt/Chg-Refurb |
Internal Refurbishment |
Nov-2002 |
Jan-2003 |
|
|
3818 |
Wanneroo Com Fac.-Boil Unts |
Install Two Mini Boil Units |
Oct-2002 |
Oct-2002 |
100 |
Completed August 02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: 24577
File Name: CAdoption of Community Consultation and Engagement Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Daniel Simms
Meeting Date: 5 November 2002
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the adoption of the Community Consultation and Engagement Policy.
Background
During discussions with the community and market research conducted during the development of the City’s Strategic Plan it was identified that Council needed to further investigate a variety of options in relation to involving people and communities in decision making.
Council at its Ordinary Council meeting on the 9 June 2002, considered the draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy and resolved the following;
“That Council:
1. ENDORSE the release of the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy (attached) for a public consultation period of 90 days.
2. ADOPT, on a trial basis, the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy pending the outcome of the consultation process.
3. NOTE that at the end of the consultation period, the Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy will be reviewed, and presented to Council for adoption having regard for the comments received.”
Detail
Detailed as Attachment 1 are the results of the consultation strategy conducted by the City and detailed below is a summary of the feedback received arising from the community consultation program.
Public Workshops
· The need for increased communication with rural residents who do not receive the local newspaper.
· The importance of feedback during consultation processes.
· Tailoring consultation techniques to specific communities was thought to be a good idea.
· Notice boards at key community points (eg. Local shopping centre, local deli) may provide a reliable method of communicating with residents of particular suburbs or areas.
Meetings with Resident and Ratepayers Associations
City staff and elected representatives attended the meetings of a total of 11 Resident and Ratepayer groups across the area. A summary of this feedback is detailed below:
· A focus on planning and development issues across the City, with members of most groups commenting that the City’s existing statutory consultation processes need to be improved. Particular issues noted included the non-availability of plans after normal business hours, and the need for all submissions to be written rather than being raised in a workshop or public meeting environment.
· The importance of receiving sufficient information at the right time so that comments could be considered.
· The importance of the City lobbying/encouraging State and Federal Government Departments to be involved in consultation.
· The importance of feedback in the consultation process, which included the final decision regarding a particular project or proposal and the reasons for making that decision.
· The local newspaper was perceived as one of the best ways to provide information to the community, with one group noting that it was, however, particularly important for individual suburb names to be highlighted so that they “stand out” in Council information and encourage residents to read and participate. Resident and Ratepayer Association newsletters and newsletters produced by development companies were also perceived as effective ways to communicate with residents.
· Difficulties associated with consulting rural communities (which reflected comments made in the public meetings).
Feedback Forms
Two feedback forms were officially submitted to the City during the consultation period.
Feedback on these forms included:
· The need to make sure residents receive enough time to consider information regarding a proposal or issue
· The need for any meetings/information to be in “plain English” that is easy to understand
· The need for Council to acknowledge feedback or submissions presented regarding a particular project or proposal
· A community representative to be on the Community Consultation Review Panel
Focus Group Meeting
Hides Consulting Group conducted a focus group meeting, involving a randomly selected group of City of Wanneroo residents, on Monday 16 September 2002.
Results from the meeting, can be summarised as follows:
· There was generally a very low level of participation in consultation activities, with the main barriers to participation noted as time and a level of direct interest in the issue.
· The local newspaper was seen as the best way to provide the community with information regarding consultation.
· For local issues, affecting neighbourhoods, participants suggested personalised letter deliveries as the most effective form of consultation. Signage on site with telephone numbers to call was also believed to be an effective method.
· For City wide consultation, the idea of a tear off section in the local paper for residents to complete and return was suggested.
· Overall, Hides Consulting Group suggested that the City focus on educating residents regarding community consultation and its importance to decision making as well as working to improve the current relationship between the City and the community.
Internal Feedback
In order to gather internal feedback and the opinions of young people regarding the draft Policy, a series of sessions were held with City staff and a meeting with the Youth Advisory Council.
Results from these meetings revealed the following:
· Young people prefer an informal, conversational approach to community consultation, as opposed to formal meetings or written submissions.
· The role of the YAC in consultation undertaken by the City was volunteered to be; an advisory panel to provide advice to Council officers regarding methods of consulting with young people and as a principle consulting body in any broad based consultation strategies to which information would be referred.
· Staff generally commented regarding the need for training as facilitators and including consultation as part of project budgets.
· Participants also raised a number of dilemmas they are currently facing including; how do you involve the community in planning rather than reacting to the implementation of plans, and how do you consult with future residents.
The proposed Community Consultation and Engagement Policy as detailed in the Officers Recommendation incorporates the feedback received as a result of the consultation undertaken including the following changes:
· Adoption of the policy on a trial basis, with a review at the end of the current financial year
· A change in policy name to “Community Consultation and Engagement Policy”. The inclusion of the term “engagement” will allow for further investigation, given the level of apathy in the community, of proactive consultation techniques, such as Household Panels and Citizens Juries. Proactive techniques will assist in “engaging” the community and hopefully begin to address levels of community disillusionment. Investigation of alternative techniques could take place during the trial period of the Policy’s operation and be included in the review of the policy before the end of the current financial year
· Inclusion of notification of relevant Resident Associations in both local and broad based community consultation strategies, with City staff attending Association meetings where necessary
· Inclusion of the Youth Advisory Council as a key stakeholder in consultation processes, providing advice to Council staff regarding consultation with young people and acting as a principal referral agency for broad based consultation
· That an immediate priority of the Community Consultation Review Panel be the review of statutory consultation methods implemented for planning and development activities, with a view to developing additional consultation methods or strategies that can be added to existing processes
· The investigation of the use of Community Noticeboards in key locations across the City and the preparation of an appropriate budget bid for the 2003/2004 financial year
· The investigation of the development and delivery of a City Newsletter to rural residents and preparation of a budget bid for the 2003/2004 financial year if appropriate
· That the inclusion of bold “suburb” or “locality” information in the Wanneroo Link Page be investigated, to ensure that residents are alerted to consultation affecting their area.
Consultation
The community consultation program undertaken for the Draft Policy included:
· Public notices in newspapers inviting submissions regarding the Draft Policy.
· A variety of media releases, both in newspapers and on radio, designed to encourage increased resident participation (material attached).
· A series of workshops on community consultation (one in the South, North and Central areas of the City) where both the concepts of consultation and the draft policy was discussed and comments of participants recorded (results attached).
· Meetings with local Resident and Ratepayer Associations across the City, where consultation and the proposed policy was discussed and feedback recorded (results attached).
· A focus group with residents undertaken by Hides Consulting Group to provide qualitative information regarding consultation and the proposed policy, based on a detailed discussion guide (report attached).
· Various internal stakeholder workshops and training sessions with all City staff and the Youth Advisory Council.
Comment
It is believed that the proposed policy provides an excellent framework for the City of Wanneroo to involve the community in the decision making process and ensure that community views are considered.
The policy works at empowering all participants and will continue to explore ways of engaging the often silent majority of the community by:
· Making people feel welcome.
· Providing comprehensive and user friendly information of the issues to be decided on.
· Encourage listening.
· Facilitate problem solving were ever possible.
It is important to note that there is never one single best model for community consultation and as a result the policy provides for the tailoring of different community consultation strategies to suit the audience and type of decision to be made.
The policy will be further reviewed over the coming months to consider further ways of engaging the community as well as issues associated with community consultation on town planning issues.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Councils’ Strategic Plan places a significant emphasis on community consultation and engagement. This is reflected in the City’s Mission Statement through Community consultation and involvement and also in the City’s Values.
The development of a Community Consultation Policy was a specific strategic action
Policy Implications
This policy will provide a contract with the community on how the City will consult with them in the future.
Financial Implications
If this policy is adopted by Council, it will be recommended that:
· Projects include an amount or percentage of total costs for consultation, that will be considered by Council during budgetary deliberations.
· A training budget to enhance staff facilitation skills be included in the 2003/2004 budget for Council consideration.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. REQUEST that the Community Consultation Review Panel further investigate strategies that provide for further increases in community engagement in council decision making.
2 ADOPT the City of Wanneroo Community Consultation and Engagement Policy as detailed below:
Community Consultation and Engagement Policy
Statement of Intent This proposed community consultation and engagement policy
provides a series of principles to guide consultation processes used by the
City of Wanneroo to encourage and support community involvement in local
government decision making.
What is consultation?
Consultation is all about involving people and communities in decision making.
It recognises that the community has a right to:
· Express their views regarding Council policies and services
· Participate in decisions affecting their daily lives
· Obtain information regarding Council priorities, expenditure and programs
Why consult?
A team approach is best…
Community consultation and participation enables Council to work with the community to make important decisions that best meet needs, both now and in planning for the future.
It provides elected members and Council staff with the opportunity to:
· Listen to the community
· Record what was said
· Develop ideas together, especially through looking at options
· Build consensus on an approach
Consultation ensures that:
· The community is aware of and involved in the development of policies and plans, services development and reviews and feels a sense of ownership of the outcomes
· Council is open and accountable in its decision making, resource management and expenditure
When will we consult?
Council will consult with residents when;
· The future use of a significant area of land within the City is being decided
· There is, or is likely to be, strong community concern or interest in the issue
· The proposals before the Council are anticipated to have a significant impact on the economy, lifestyle, amenity and/or environment of the City or its residents
· Government agencies, other than Council, have a stated interest in any policy or plans being considered
· The resolution of an issue or implementation of a proposal is likely to require a substantial redirection of ratepayer funds either by up front or ongoing costs
· Information is needed by Councillors or staff about community needs, priorities or values to ensure planning is appropriate and responsive
· The Council has statutory obligations to consult with the community
· The Council wishes to ensure that minority or disadvantaged groups have information about, and access to, the services and programs of Council
Examples of the type of issues on which Council will consult with the community include:
· The positioning of new playground equipment or features in parks
· Any changes to the way in which public open spaces and parks are used or function
· The development of new community services and facilities
· New or changed roads or the closure/development of public access ways
· Changes to the way land is used throughout the City of Wanneroo
· The development of policies and strategies affecting the future development of the City
It is important for the community to know that any consultation undertaken by Council will be completed BEFORE a decision is made. Consultation and a commitment to community involvement is not effective or appropriate when;
· A final decision has already been made, by Council or another agency
· Council cannot influence a decision to be made by another agency or party
· There is insufficient time available to consult, due to legislative, resource or legal constraints.
In these events Council will always endeavour to provide information relating to the reasons why Council could not seek community consultation on the issue.
In some circumstances, Council will carry out initial communication/notification procedures for regular services eg. Traffic design or land development, and may become aware through responses received that the community or key stakeholders have strong feelings concerning the issue. Consultation processes such as focus groups, public meetings, mediation, or community forums are then options to be considered to resolve the issue(s).
How will we consult?
In undertaking any consultation process Council will be committed to the following principles
Participation by:
· Recognising that the City of Wanneroo community includes everyone who lives, works, or visits here who all have an equal right to contribute to decision making
· Respecting the diversity of the Wanneroo community and that different kinds of contributions will be received from different sections of the community
· Acknowledging that affected groups and interested parties can select their own representatives to work with Council
· Creating an environment where people can feel safe expressing their views
The minimisation of barriers to participation by:
· Making it as easy as possible for those affected to take part in consultation
· Being sensitive to the needs of all sectors of the community and providing measures for them to contribute fully to consultation. This includes special needs related to language or culture, disability, transport or any other issue affecting participation
A clear focus and purpose by:
· Informing the community clearly and honestly what the consultation is about and what it aims to achieve
· Stating Council’s role in the consultation and the role of other participants
· Telling participants how their feedback will be used
· Not using the information gathered for any other purpose, unless the community has approved this use before, during or after the consultation
· Providing information regarding the final decision or outcome to all participants
· Working towards outcomes that have broad community support
Making information readily available by:
· Making sure that information relevant to the consultation is accessible before time for participants
· Ensuring that any information provided will be accurate, comprehensive and easy to understand
· Taking into account the needs of different language groups if appropriate to the consultation and resources are available
· Letting the community know if any information cannot be disclosed because it is commercially sensitive or of a personal nature
Allowing enough time by:
· Ensuring there is sufficient time and opportunity for those interested to take part in consultation and contribute
· Setting reasonable timelines
· Ensuring that time is available to debate or investigate any important issues that arise
Listening and responding to participants and the community by:
· Respecting the diverse range of views and interests that a are represented
· Being open to new ideas and altering a proposed course of action
· Making all reasonable attempts to reach an acceptable solution
· When a decision has been made, informing all participants and the community. If there is a difference between the input received and during consultation and the final decision, the reasons for this will also be provided
Considering additional input by:
· Allowing residents to officially request informal or formal meetings regarding the issue during the consultation period
· Acknowledging and including any petitions or other forms of representation regarding the issue received during the consultation period
· Conducting, where requested and possible, any electors meetings during the consultation period and utilising information from this process to assist in decision making
Being efficient, responsible and accountable by:
· Balancing the responsibility to consult with affected parties with the need to manage ratepayer funds prudently
· Carefully costing and considering all major consultation exercises
· Evaluating each consultation and resultant decision making process, to continually improve practices and procedures
How will we know if our consultation processes are working?
To assist the City in finding the most effective ways to consult the community, this policy provides for the review of consultation processes utilising a variety of methods including:
· Talking to participants during and after consultation about the strategies and processes used
· Measuring community satisfaction with consultation processes on an annual basis, as a key performance indicator for the City
· Staff evaluation of consultation strategies, submitted to the Community Consultation Review Panel after each project is completed
What does this mean for residents? What can they expect?
These principles mean, if a decision directly affecting residents, their immediate community or the wider City of Wanneroo is to be made, that residents can expect:
· To be informed of the way in which they can contribute to the decision
· To be able to participate in consultation, regardless of their cultural or linguistic background or any disability
· To be provided with enough information about the issue prior to having their input
· To have a reasonable time period to consider the information and make contributions
· To have their views listened to and acknowledged throughout the consultation
· To be informed regarding the final decision or outcome and the reasons for making this decision
· To be able to suggest or request additional forms of consultation with elected representatives throughout the consultation period if they feel they are necessary
How will the consultation process work?
Consultation processes and methods are changing, as are the types of decisions local government makes as part of their operations.
As a general guide regarding the types of consultation and communication that will be required for certain types of decisions, the table on the following page will be utilised.
It is noted that local Residents Associations can provide valuable input into the decision making process and this policy requires that these associations be notified of local and broad based community consultation strategies relevant to their area and that staff attend association meetings where necessary.
In order to ensure that the input of the City’s youth is included in the community consultation strategy the Youth Advisory Council has been identified as a key stakeholder in consultation processes, providing advice to Council staff regarding consultation with young people and acting as a principal referral agency for broad based consultation.
Key definitions for the types of consultation to be utilised for certain types of decisions are provided below.
Type of consultation/participation
|
Definition |
Information Sharing and Awareness
|
Providing information to increase resident awareness and use of Council services and facilities |
Targeted community consultation
|
Sharing and obtaining information from those residents directly affected or with a keen interest/point of view regarding an issue |
Full community consultation
|
Sharing and obtaining information from all City of Wanneroo residents or a statistically valid sample of residents on a particular issue |
|
|
Level of Community Participation |
|
|||
Category |
Area |
No or Limited consultation
|
Information sharing and education |
Targeted community consultation |
Full community consultation |
Examples of Processes |
1 |
Internal Council operations
Examples: Human Resources (staff recruitment) Operational/Financial Management |
|
|
|
|
Employment procedures, position descriptions and organisational structures |
2 |
Council Programs and Activities
Examples: Building approval services Dog registration Aged and Disabled Services\ Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Service brochures and pamphlets Press releases Public notices “What’s Happening in Wanneroo” Community Directory of Council Services |
3 |
Statutory Processes
Examples: Rezoning applications Structure Plan Applications/Amendments Development Applications Subdivision applications |
|
|
|
|
Public meetings Workshops with stakeholders Requests for submissions and comment (advertised)
|
4 |
Local or District Issues
Examples:
Playground developments Road developments Changes to Public Open Space, Recreational areas, Community Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Letters to surrounding/adjoining residents Small focus groups/workshops Issue based surveys
|
5 |
Policy and Strategy Development – Issue Based
Examples:
Rural Strategy Commercial Centres Strategy Community Funding Policy Dry/Irrigated Parks Policy
|
|
|
|
|
Public meetings/forums Requests for submissions and/or comment Issue based workshops Surveys (issue or service based) Reference groups involving Government, industry and community groups |
6 |
General Policy and Strategy Development, Introduction of new Services Examples: City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan Regional Planning District Planning Scheme Introduction of new services eg. Safer Citizens Principal Activities Plan |
|
|
|
|
Public meetings/forums City wide surveys Workshops Focus groups City listening posts Plans/documents available for comment Request for submissions and comment (advertised) |
To make sure that each consultation process is appropriate to the type of decision to be made and the people that will be affected, a consultation strategy for each individual consultation in Categories 4 to 6 will be developed and ratified by a Community Consultation Review Panel.
The Community Consultation Review Panel will consist of:
· The Chief Executive Officer of nominated representative
· The Directors of each City Directorate or their nominated representatives
· Manager, Strategic and Executive Services
· Social Planning Co-ordinator
· Strategic Planner
· Manager, Marketing Services
The Community Consultation Review Panel will be responsible for:
· Providing advice and assistance to staff regarding appropriate methods of community consultation
· Receiving community consultation strategies from Council officers
· Assessing these strategies against the principles of this policy
· Ratifying strategies and referring them to Council or the CEO for endorsement
· Evaluating consultation processes
· Reporting to Council on a quarterly basis regarding community consultation strategies undertaken and their effectiveness
· Maintaining a record of all consultation undertaken by the City
· Contributing to the development of new consultation processes that uphold the principles of this policy and make it easier for all sections of the community to participate in decision making
· A general review of the procedures for consultation in Categories 1 to 3
The Panel will brief the Mayor and Council’s Policy Forum regarding proposed consultation strategies for individual projects in order to receive comments and input.
Operation of the Policy
To ensure that this policy is upheld throughout the organisation, Council will be committed to:
· Providing adequate resources for consultation
· Providing staff with appropriate training and resources to develop and implement consultation strategies
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1 -
PAGE 1 OF 54
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Lake Neerabup Residents Group
Date: Thursday 18 July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· Members of the Group commented that their experience with community consultation had been community rather than Council driven and often involved issues where third parties (such as State Government departments) needed to be present to answer technical questions and talk about decision making processes
· They noted that several offers had been made by the Group to be involved and consulted on particular issues however invitations had not been taken up by the City
· For some statutory processes in particular, it was noted that it is difficult for residents and groups to have their say, given that plans are normally only available for inspection during business hours and all comments needed to be written as opposed to being made in a workshop or public meeting environment
· The group identified what they believed to be the four most important issues when consulting which are:
o Making sure that all groups /representatives are informed and have a sufficient opportunity to make comment
o Expectation management – making sure that all residents and representatives involved in consultation know the purpose of the consultation and the types of decisions that will be made as a result of, and including their input
o Feedback regarding the outcomes of consultation, including notification of decisions made utilising community comment provided to all participants
o Developing a partnership with the community, so that acceptable and consensus driven decisions can be made
· Ways in which to consult the rural community were discussed in detail, with the Residents Group themselves also experiencing difficulty consulting with residents in this area.
· It was noted that the Sun City News publication is delivered to rural residents with the normal mail delivery, however its day of distribution needs to coincide with residents also receiving Australia Post Mail or they do not receive the publication.
· It was generally noted that additional methods to the Wanneroo Times were required for rural community consultation, given that this publication is not delivered to rural homes
· Some suggestions for improved methods of rural consulting included the establishment of a Residents Group newsletter and a Council Noticeboard at Healy’s Garage on Wanneroo Road
· Particular issues and consultation strategies raised by the Group throughout the discussion included; the Draft Local Rural Strategy, Lot 211 Mindarie, and other statutory processes involving changes to land use affecting the area
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Banksia Grove Residents Association
Date: Monday 26 August 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· Members of the Association expressed concerns related to the level of apathy existing in the community generally, which meant that a number of forms of community consultation were not successful
· They did note however that, if issues were sufficiently significant, residents would make themselves heard by local authorities, via a number of means including their elected representatives
· Several remarks were made regarding State Government decisions and their impact on local communities – items discussed included the railway crossing planned for Quinns Road. This particular item was used as an illustration of a decision by another authority that Council was unable to impact whilst being made but advocated on behalf of the community to relevant authorities
· Efficient methods of distributing information to residents of Banksia Grove noted by the group included:
o The Wanneroo Times – however there have been some difficulties surrounding its delivery to this suburb
o The local Deli noticeboard
o Noticeboard at Banksia Grove Community Centre
o Local Neighbourhood Watch newsletters
o Letter box drops, which would be undertaken by the Residents Association free of charge if possible
· Members of the Association also felt that public meetings would only attract participants if staff/representatives attending were sufficiently briefed and able to answer detailed questions regarding issues
· A number of other items were also discussed throughout the course of the consultative meeting, with the officer present providing a commitment that each of the issues raised would be investigated and the Association notified of outcomes as soon as possible
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Girrawheen Progress Association
Date: Monday 19th August 2002, 7:00pm
All present considered that Council’s track record in Consultation was pretty good. In order to assist the group explore the issues further Cr Hughes brought to the groups attention various projects undertaken by the City including:
In regards to public notice boards it was noted that the majority of people in the area shop at the Mirrabooka Shopping Centre.
The group indicated very strong support for information to be published in the Wanneroo Times
The group also highlighted that they also received most of their information on Council through Cr Hughes during the Association meetings and also by contacting Cr Hughes directly.
The group did discuss the change in library hours and suggested that a bookmark inserted into each book borrowed may have been a good tool to advise the community of the change in operating hours.
Further discussion on this matter provided a suggestion that this bookmark could be coloured coded to highlight the importance of the issue (i.e. red, yellow and green).
Some members of the group have accessed information using council’s web site and it was seen as being a tool that will become widely used. There was a limited awareness of the Twin Cities FM station by the group, but after being advised some members indicated that they would tune into it.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Marangaroo Residents and Ratepayers Association
Date: Wednesday 24 July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· Members of the Association noted that their consultation with Council in the past had been initiated by the Association on direct issues, including Frangipani Park, funding for a lighting project in Alexander Heights and a proposal for a Skate/BMX park in Marangaroo
· It was noted that the John Maloney Clubrooms now provided a venue for more regular consultation with the Marangaroo community
· Members of the Association commented that increased community consultation involving the Association would result in an increased membership and interest in the area
· They noted the importance of feeling that they are listened to throughout a consultation process, which highlighted the importance of feedback both during and after comment is sought from the community
· Some members perceived a divide between residents and Council, or an “us” and “them” mentality, which was thought could be improved by more regular Council officer attendance at Association meetings
· A possible project for the Association over the next 12 months may be the development of a fridge magnet/calendar to increase awareness regrading the group throughout the Marangaroo community
· Particular issues and projects raised by the Group throughout the discussion included; Frangipani Park, the Skate/BMX facility currently in proposal stage and the extension to Hepburn Avenue
· Two issues/projects raised by the Group for actioning by the City were: the construction of a fence across the northern end of the conservation area associated with the extension of Hepburn Avenue to prevent trail bike access, and increased patrolling of John Maloney and Paloma Parks for dog related infringements
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Mindarie Community Group
Date: Tuesday 2 July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· The principle issue raised by this group in relation to community consultation was the importance of feedback regarding decisions made where consultation is involved.
· Participants noted that would like to be informed regarding the final decision made and the reasons for that decision, as well as being kept up to date should there be additional changes made to decisions as a result of other processes (eg. Deputations to Council)
· They felt that consulting with resident and ratepayers associations and other leading community groups was beneficial, provided that this process was part of a broader strategy where the wider community was also consulted. It was noted, however, that issues associated with public liability insurance may make it difficult for groups of this nature to continue operations in the future. Participants noted that the City, in addition to State Government, should be investigating methods to alleviate problems associated with public liability insurance, and suggested that some type of blanket policy for community groups be pursued, with contributions placed in a pool insurance system.
· It was noted that it was particularly important for the City to assess, during the development of a consultation strategy, the ability of local groups to represent a “big picture” of a particular suburb or area, rather than a minority opinion.
· Participants also noted some problems currently occurring with the City’s current information database regarding local groups and organisations – duplicate and outdated information is being retained and needs to be co-ordinated. The group were informed that the City is currently in the process of employing a Community Information Officer to alleviate these problems.
· Access by the City to local newsletters and newspapers to advertise community consultation was also perceived to be important, particularly those newsletters distributed by either the Residents Association themselves or developers of a particular residential estate.
· It was felt that the City’s website could be improved as an impartial source of information for residents, not linked to any other sites who may have a vested interest in the area (eg. Development companies)
· The importance of providing trained facilitators for consulting activities was also noted, which they felt would provide a greater degree of impartiality to discussions regarding proposals or issues. Appropriate venues and adequate equipment (eg. Personal Address systems) were also noted as being important, particularly in situations where an emotive issue was being discussed which was likely to draw large attendances
· The Privacy Act and its impact on community groups was also mentioned, with the group recommending that any consultation material be addressed to officer bearers (eg. President or Secretary) rather than individuals, who may leave positions. It was also noted that, where available, post office boxes should be used rather than personal addresses.
· Members of the group also requested that the City provide some additional public information regarding two key issues currently affecting the area – Lot 211 Mindarie and the Draft Structure Plan for Tamala Park. In regard to Lot 211 Mindarie, members of the group were concerned that the concept for the area had been significantly changed without further community consultation, particularly in relation to the protection of residential tenancies.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Wanneroo Ratepayers and Residents Association
Date: Thursday 25th July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
Comments made in relation to other general issues
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Carramar Residents Association
Date: Monday 8 July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· Members of the Association stressed the importance of receiving information regarding proposals or proposed decisions at the right time, to allow sufficient time to consider and make comments. The importance of receiving enough information to make comment was also noted.
· Given the relatively recent establishment of this estate, meaning that important facilities such as schools and shopping centres had yet to be initiated, members of the Association noted the importance of the City of Wanneroo maintaining a working relationship and communication with other State Government Departments responsible for the provision of facilities. They felt that this working relationship would allow for a greater quality of information to be passed on to residents
· Also associated with Carramar’s recent establishment as a suburb of the City, participants noted the need for surveys to determine the needs and wants of residents. They felt that information of this nature would assist Council to plan for future facilities and services
· In regard to ways to distribute information on consultation programs, participants noted that letterbox drops throughout the suburb had a mixed success rate, and recommended the use of the Estate’s quarterly newsletter, as well as notices throughout the suburb and at the local delicatessen. Community Newspapers were also perceived as an important method of distributing information, provided all notices highlighted the word “Carramar” so that residents would notice information relevant to their suburb.
· Particular issues relating to the suburb raised throughout the meeting included; the recent structure plan amendment application submitted for a neighbourhood centre/ public open space/primary school/community purposes site within the suburb and the route to be taken by Pinjar Road through the Estate.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Two Rocks Yanchep Residents Association
Date: Monday 22nd July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
Comments made in relation to other general issues
Mayor Jon Kelly and the Chief Executive Officer provided responses to the above issues during the meeting.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Koondoola Residents and Tenants Action Group
Date: Wednesday 3rd July 2002 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
After general discussion the group agreed to further consider the draft policy and let Council know of any further comments or suggestions.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Landsdale Residents Association
Date: Monday 1st July 2002, 7.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
After general discussion the group agreed to further consider the draft policy and let Council know of any further comments or suggestions.
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Youth Advisory Council (YAC)
Date: Tuesday 20 August 2002, 5.30pm
Comments regarding consultation:
· The principle issue raised by this group in relation to community consultation was that young people preferred an informal, conversational approach rather than more traditional forms of consultation such as public meetings and written submissions
· Members of the Council noted that it was more effective to talk to young people in a setting in which they feel comfortable, rather than requesting that they attend a meeting in a Council venue or be asked to consider a proposal that was posted or provided to them
· Types of settings suggested for consulting with young people included; youth centres, skateparks and shopping centres. It was also suggested that consultation be combined with some type of event for young people (such as a skate competition) or at other venues, including the YMCA mobile activity van
· Members of the Council felt that it was particularly important to consult with young people regarding:
o Shopping Centre Developments
o The development or changes to public open space
o Community Safety and Security
o Community Facilities
o Services and Programs
o Community events (particularly those focussed on young people such as LIVE)
o Broad based community issues
· The role of the YAC in consultation was also discussed, with members of the group suggesting that the Council could serve a dual purpose being;
o An Advisory Panel to provide advice to Council officers regarding methods of consulting with young people
o A principle consulting body where the Council would be included as a key stakeholder in any broad based consultation strategies and referred information accordingly
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Consultation Public Forum – Hainsworth Leisure Centre
Date: Wednesday 21st August 2002, 7:00pm
Comments regarding consultation generally:
· Participants noted that there was a culture of apathy across the area due to a number of negative experiences they have had with government agencies and departments generally
· A perception of there being a “wall” between public service and the community was felt to exist, along with a “steamroller” approach from Government Departments, which left residents feeling like decisions had already been made and consultation was just a token gesture
· The importance of listening and understanding was also raised, with participants feeling that the majority of time there was no real comprehension of their concerns, issues or ideas or inclusion of them in decision making processes
Comments regarding methods of consulting/distributing information:
· When discussing how residents access information in their area, participants noted that:
o Leaflets distributed with advertising material (junk mail) were not normally effective, as this type of material is generally thrown away and not read. A leaflet insert in the community newspaper was felt to be a more effective method of distributing information in this manner
o A regular feature (1/2 – 1 page) of City of Wanneroo information in the community newspaper was felt to be a good idea, allowing residents to become familiar with where information regarding Council activities, programs and consultation was available
o A notice board at the local shopping centre or newsagent was also perceived as being an effective communication tool
o School newsletters were also mentioned as another form of effective communication
o The City’s website could also be effective, provided that it is updated on a regular basis
Comments regarding the City and City services in general:
· Attendees requested that they be referred to by the City as “residents”, rather than “customers”, noting that a customer is a willing participant when in many cases (such as the payment of rates) they do not have choices or cannot decide to switch to another Council should they receive a low level of service
· It was suggested that information regarding bulk collection or clean up days be provided on the City’s website so that residents could access information rather than calling the City
· Twin Cities FM and the City’s Heartbeat segment was also discussed as a method of communicating with residents
Record of Consultative Meeting
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
Group Name: Consultation Public Forum – Wanneroo Civic Centre
Date: Wednesday 7th August 2002, 7:00pm
Comments regarding timelines:
Comments regarding rural issues/distribution of information regarding Council activities/consultation:
Comments regarding other services:
Comments regarding planning issues:
Further comments made in relation to consulting with the rural sector:
Topics |
Topics |
Ranger Services |
Inappropriate behaviour |
Safer Citizens |
Dumping areas |
Education issues |
|
Target issues |
|
Environment |
|
CALM linkage |
|
Community Consultation |
|
Prepared for:
City of Wanneroo
23 Dundebar Road
Wanneroo WA 6065
September 2002 Hides Consulting Group Pty Ltd
Ref: 2002 136A ABN 46 072 52 064
Trading as:
Hides Group
Hides Consulting
Hides Entertainment
Hides Field Services
PO Box 1390, West Perth
Western Australia, 6872
Telephone: (618) 9324 1377
Hides Group - Proud Sponsor of the Western Australian Museum Facsimile: (618) 9324 1477
Winner of the 2000 Arts Sponsorship Scheme - Outstanding Patron Award E-mail: hides@hidesgroup.com
Table Of Contents
Page
1 OBJECTIVES OF THE FOCUS GROUP 1
2 Recruitment of Participants 2
5.1 Previous Involvement in Community Consultation 3
5.2 Types of Decisions Council Should Get Resident Feedback on? 4
5.3 Best Means of Consulting with Residents 5
5.3.1 Local Newspaper 5
5.3.2 Personalised Mail-Outs 5
5.3.3 Door-To-Door Interviews 5
5.3.4 Public-Place Opinion Booths 6
5.3.5 Resident Panel / Jury 6
5.3.6 Local Radio 7
5.4 Perceptions of Different Ways to Review Different Issues 7
5.4.1 Consultation with the Immediate Neighbourhood 7
5.4.2 Consultation with the Entire City 7
6 CONCLUSION ~ focus group findings 8
7 Pre-Group QUESTIONNAIRE findings 9
7.1 Perceived Importance of Community Consultation 9
7.2 Issues of Greatest Impact on Community 9
7.3 Best Ways in Which to Gather Residents’ Views 10
7.4 Certainty About How to Consult with Council 10
7.5 Interest in Being Involved in Council Decision-Making 11
7.6 Work and Business Ownership in City 11
Appendix 1 : Focus Group Recruitment Guide
Appendix 2 : Pre-Focus Group Questionnaire
Appendix 3 : Focus Group Discussion Guide
List Of Tables
Page
Table 7.1: On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very unimportant” and 5 is “very important,” how important do you believe it is for City residents to be involved in major decisions made by Council? 9
Table 7.2: Can you specify the 3 issues you believe have had or are having the greatest impact on the City’s Community? 9
Table 7.3: Can you suggest what would be the best way Council could gather residents’ views about City issues when making major decisions? 10
Table 7.4: On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very uncertain” and 5 is “very certain,” how certain are you about the following: 10
Table 7.5: On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very uninterested” and 5 is “very interested,” how interested are you personally in being involved in decision-making for the City? 11
Table 7.6: Do you work and / or own a business in the City? 11
The overall purpose of the focus group was to establish residents’ perceptions of what issues City of Wanneroo’s Council should be consulting residents on and what the optimum means of consultation would be with residents, and how these mediums differed amongst issues. More specifically, the discussion questions as provided by the City were:
1. What types of things or decisions do you think it is important for Council to get your feedback?
2. Have you been involved in consultation in the past and what have been your experiences?
3. What do you think are the best ways for Council to consult with you and the community generally?
4. Do you think that Council should consult about different issues or with different communities using a variety of methods or should they do the same thing every time. For example, surveys regarding the future of the City, public meetings regarding the use of different pieces of land, on site meetings, letters to residents.
Secondary, or reserve questions included establishing whether participants had been involved in consultation with other state and federal agencies, and how they felt about the concept of establishing a community group responsible for making decisions regarding contentious issues.
In total 10 residents were recruited for the group, 8 of which attended the session. As requested by the City, an equal proportion of men and women were recruited. All participants owned homes in the City and represented different household structures. The 8 participants who attended the session were profiled as:
w A single mother.
w A single father.
w A father, married with youngest child aged 13 years or more.
w A mother, married with youngest child aged 13 years or more.
w A father, married with youngest child aged 12 years or less.
w A mother, married with youngest child aged 12 years or less.
w A first time home-owner without children.
w A senior / retired resident with no children living at home.
Participants were recruited from the Hides Group database. All employees of the City, or respondents who worked within the market research or advertising industries, were screened out of selection. A copy of the recruitment guide is attached as Appendix 1.
The focus group was held at the Hides Group purpose-built facility in West Perth, 16 September 2002. The group was scheduled to run for 1½ hours. A copy of the general discussion guide is included as Appendix 3.
In addition to the group discussion, the Group developed a brief survey replicating the issues to be discussed in the group. The survey was completed by participants prior to the commencement of the session. A copy of the questionnaire is attached as Appendix 2. Findings from the survey are detailed in Section 7. These findings should be reviewed as indicative only. Because of the small sample size, it is not possible to draw any statistically valid conclusions.
Findings have been specified according to the focus group discussion questions.
5.1 Previous Involvement In Community Consultation
Most participants could not recall being involved, or being asked to be involved in community consultation. However, most agreed (and nobody disagreed) that community consultation was more evident now than ever in the past.
When prompted with consultation sources such as “surveys” and “telephone interviews,” most participants recalled speaking with a “telemarketer” or “researcher.”
When questioned whether members had participated in consultation through other government bodies, only one participant responded. He had attended a meeting that was arranged to discuss the development of a recreation centre in a northern suburbs location. In describing the meeting he said ‘A few people were for it, but to be honest the majority of the feedback was no (against the development).”
As a follow-on from the apparent lack of participation in consultation, participants were asked what they believed were the main barriers for participation. The first response mentioned was “time.” The same group member continued by saying “And for someone to go to a meeting it has to be an important issue. Something that stirs up a bit of emotion.” He suggested road works as an example of such an issue that may stir emotion. Others in the group tended to agree that to attend a meeting, you would need to be relatively passionate about the issue to be discussed.
One of the ladies in the group described a barrier to attendance as a lack of faith that one’s opinions or views would be heard and utilised. She referred to a development that she believed the surrounding community was against. She said ‘a lot of the community didn’t want it, but it went ahead. And you think, well, why bother… do we have any say?”
5.2 Types of Decisions Council Should Get Resident Feedback on?
When first questioned about what issues residents should be consulted on, nobody in the group responded with a definite response.
The issues that were mentioned were issues that were relevant personally to members and not considered on a wider Community or City scale. Moreover, they were incident reports rather than on-going issues. For example, one participant mentioned the lack of management of a midge problem around a neighbourhood lake. She also described lack of signage being placed around the same lake, to alert park users of muddy banks.
Unprompted, the issue of street changes was brought up by a member. All members felt this was an issue that residents should be consulted on before development commences. Specifically, participants believed residents immediately effected by the change should be consulted, as the comments ‘people in the neighbourhood (should be consulted)’ and ‘where it has the biggest impact’ illustrate.
The example of “improvements to Scenic Drive” was mentioned by a group member. Several group members were aware of the change, and when asked whether they recalled being contacted (or consulted) about the change, all said they had not. However, this was not viewed negatively, as the following comment demonstrates, ‘No (I was not contacted), I didn’t know anything about it. I’m quite happy for the improvement.’
The restoration of beachfronts was mentioned unprompted. This participant said ‘The whole community should be involved rather than just the beachfront people in the Quinns area, because that is part of the City of Wanneroo and a lot of people are going to go to that beach when it’s fixed up.’ Nobody disagreed that consultation with the entire City should be conducted when reviewing issues that potentially effect the entire City.
All participants were not aware of how the City’s budget was distributed amongst projects. Moreover, they were not interested to know budget allocations, and it was not suggested that the Community needed to be consulted about budget allocations. The comment ‘I don’t really think about it. You have to pay it and you pay it. What difference does it make if you know about it,’ illustrates such views.
Participants had difficulties making the distinction between incident complaints and pro-active consultation. Group members equated their telephone complaints as being consultation with the City.
5.3 Best Means of Consulting with Residents
In no hierarchical order, the consultation mediums discussed are detailed below.
The local newspaper was overwhelmingly the most frequently mentioned source to use to request feedback from residents about potential changes or issues in the City. Discussions suggested that the City should first clearly inform readers about the issue, and then have an attached feedback form which residents could complete and send back to the City. The following comment illustrates, ‘Have a City of Wanneroo page (in the local paper) and everyone knows that every week it’s on page three. It could first be an information page for Wanneroo. You could then cut a bit out and send it in (with opinions on a particular issue).’
Participants suggested that mail-outs would be more effective if they were personalised. Moreover, “To the householder” mail often gets lost amongst promotional material. One participant suggested that the Council may be able to access a list of street names, addresses and contact information when needing to contact residents within a particular area.
When asked whether such measures would increase consultation, the comment ‘I think if they put the appropriate information into the envelope and if it affected people (they would respond),’ best described the group’s opinions. One respondent suggested that a survey with an “incentive lucky dip prize” may encourage feedback.
It was suggested that for issues that impact immediate areas, door-to-door interviews may be appropriate, where “official” personnel would conduct the interviews with clear identification worn. Participants appreciated that this was not a practical approach on a City scale.
5.3.4 Public-Place Opinion Booths
Group discussions suggested that having booths or billboard stands in shopping centres (or public places) may be an option to educate the public about issues that Council wish to consult with the community about. Passers would complete forms or the like to voice their opinions about the issue on location. One participant mentioned that such consultation was conducted when ‘roads were getting widened up towards Yanchep.’ She explained that ‘It was in a shopping centre, a questionnaire. There were people there to answer your questions.’ Another participant recalled the same and indicated ‘Oh yes, that was good.’
An obstacle identified with the shopping centre medium was that most of the large shopping centres people visited were not in the City of Wanneroo. The comment ‘We mostly go do our shopping at Joondalup. We don’t come into contact with the City of Wanneroo,’ best illustrates this point. ‘Mirrabooka Shopping Centre’ was mentioned as an example shopping centre, however nobody made comment about it not being in the City.
The idea of a panel was positively received. Participants envisaged the panel to be a “jury” of 5 to 12 members, that would have no working relations with the Council and would consist of different residents for each issue discussed. They would be selected randomly, so as to eliminate the potential of voluntary residents with extreme views. Some of the following comments were made:
‘Better with total strangers with no ties to the Council or politics.’
‘I think that would be good if you changed the five people regularly. If you ultimately picked 5 residents and said we have something to be discussed, meet here, you’d get more genuine feedback because it would always be new.’
‘So you’re getting the public in.’ (Expression of appreciation that public opinion is being included).
‘Why don’t you get all the people and all the residents and have it (consultation) like a jury- I’m sure they’ve (the City / Council) got a list somewhere - and they can just ring up people and say, we’re going to have a meeting to discuss this (an issue), would you like to come.’
‘I’ve been to other focus groups before and I think this is a pretty good way of doing it.’
Whilst one respondent suggested the local radio may be a more ideal venue than a public forum, all participants indicated they did not listen to the local radio. Some did not know a local radio station existed.
5.4 Perceptions of Different Ways to Review Different Issues
Participants grouped issues into one of two categories - those that affected the entire City and those that effected immediate neighbourhoods.
5.4.1 Consultation with the Immediate Neighbourhood
The concept of “immediate” neighbourhoods was initially mentioned when the group was discussing road works. In this sense, “immediate” referred to those homes located on the streets where developments would take place, or those homes (and residents) living nearby who most likely would use the streets. The best definition for the scope of “immediate” would be all those who are likely to be directly affected by prospective change or development.
For issues classified as affecting the “immediate neighbourhood,” participants suggested personalised mail-outs to residents living on the streets affected by the proposed changes, as an effective means of consultation. Further, they suggested erecting signage of the proposed changes and advertising of contact numbers residents could call to voice their opinions.
5.4.2 Consultation with the Entire City
It was consistently suggested that the best avenue for consultation with the entire City was through the local paper. Moreover, a page within the paper would be devoted to the City. Each week (or as relevant), the City would inform readers of an issue and have a tear-off section readers could complete and send back to the City, with their views. The next week’s edition of the paper would print the results from the readers’ feedback.
After much discussion, the concept of a “jury” panel was also seen favourably. Assuming it complied with the group’s assumption (as discussed in Section 5.3.5), it was viewed as a fair and insightful way of consulting. The idea of discussion appealed to the participants.
CONCLUSION ~ focus group findings
Community consultation is a concept that members had difficulties separating from community complaints. There are two keys issues in play:
Firstly, to have the community involved in decision-making was viewed almost as an alien concept, and contradictory to an implied system where Council makes decisions without input from outer sources.
Secondly, superior to the lack of time and lack of awareness for non-participation, is the degree of importance participants placed on communicating (consulting) with the City about issues. Unless the issue to be discussed was highly (negatively) personal or relevant to the participant, voluntary involvement in consultation would be unlikely. Participants tended to be happy with not being consulted when they viewed the issue or change as being an “improvement” to their circumstances. The example of “improvements to Scenic Drive,” where the participant had said she had not been contacted, but was happy for the change, best illustrates this point.
As an initial step in encouraging community consultation, the following needs to occur:
w A clear distinction be established in the Community’s distinction between Customer Complaints and Community Consultation.
w Education and on-going promotion of the importance and Council’s desires to hear the Community’s views on issues, and incorporate their opinions in decision-making.
w A transformation in residents’ current views of Council as an independent body from the Community, to the Council and the Community as a body serving and focusing on the same needs.
Participants’ division of issues into those which effect the immediate neighbourhood and those which effect the entire City, is again evidence of the degree of importance and relevance individuals place on issues, and would therefore feel the need to react to or become involved in.
To communicate with the immediate neighbourhood, the idea of a personalised survey form was viewed favourably. The main obstacle to overcome would be stressing the importance of those who view an issue or change positively to also offer feedback, so that a more balanced gathering of perceptions could be obtained.
The idea of a “jury” panel was favourably adopted by participants. The concept of discussion was certainly the most popular aspect. It appeared to differ from a public meeting as it was smaller, more personal and controlled. Participants liked the idea of having neutral bodies, selected randomly, coming together to discuss issues. They believed this would alleviate bias of residents’ views passionately against a proposal. Further, since the (jury) members would not be member of Council, the jury discussion would be immune to any political bias.
PRE-GROUP QUESTIONNAIRE FINDINGS
Detailed below are the frequencies for each of the community consultation related questions, in the pre-focus group questionnaire (Appendix 1). The frequencies are intended to be a comparative against the group discussions. Because of the small sample size, it is not possible to draw any statistically valid conclusions.
7.1 Perceived Importance of Community Consultation
7.2 Issues of Greatest Impact on Community
7.3 Best Ways in Which to Gather Residents’ Views
7.4 Certainty About How to Consult with Council
7.5 Interest in Being Involved in Council Decision-Making
7.6 Work and Business Ownership in City
Table 0.6 : Do you work and / or own a business in the City?
APPENDIX 1
|
Focus Group
|
CONFIDENTIAL
All work conducted on behalf of Hides Group is confidential under the Code of Professional Behaviour of the Market Research Society of Australia. No information about this project, questionnaire or respondents should be disclosed to any third party.
Good (.....) my name is (.....) from Hides Group. We are conducting research regarding communication services in the City of Wanneroo. You do not need to be an expert in this area; it is important for us to speak with residents of the City. In order to collect your thoughts, Hides Consulting is arranging a group discussion. We are currently recruiting people to take part in this group. The group will consist of 10 people and will run for about 1½ hours. We will provide snacks and refreshments and all you have to do is come along and talk about your experiences as a resident. Everything you say will remain confidential. To show our appreciation for your help, we will give you $50 cash for coming along.
To start with, I would like to ask you a few short questions.
Recruit Confirm Attend
S.1 Gender (record automatically)
Male .......................................................................................................................... 1 1 1
Female ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 2
S.2 Do you or does anyone in your household work in advertising, market research or for the City of Wanneroo?
Yes (Terminate).......................................................................................................... 1
No (Continue)............................................................................................................ 2 2 2
S.3 Have you participated in a group discussion for market research in the past six months?
Yes (Terminate).......................................................................................................... 1
No (Continue)............................................................................................................ 2 2 2
S.4 Could you please tell me whether you own or rent your property?
Own (Continue)......................................................................................................... 1 1 1
Rent (Terminate)........................................................................................................ 2
S.5 Are you a first time home owner?
Yes (Type 5) (Go to END)........................................................................................ 1 1 1
No (Continue)............................................................................................................ 2 2 2
S.6 Which of the following best describes your household?
Single without children (Terminate)..................................................................................... 1 1 1
Single with youngest child aged 12 years or less (Type 1)................................................. 2 2 2
Single with youngest child aged 13 years or more and living at home (Type 1).............. 3 3 3
Young couple without children (Type 5)............................................................................ 4 4 4
Couple with youngest child aged 12 years or less (Type 3)............................................... 5 5 5
Couple with youngest child aged 13 years or more and living at home (Type 4)............ 6 6 6
Later family with no children living at home (Type 2)...................................................... 7 7 7
Older couple without children (Type 2).............................................................................. 8 8 8
Other (Terminate)................................................................................................................... 9 9 9
Don’t Know (Terminate)....................................................................................................... 10 10 10
Refused (Terminate)............................................................................................................... 11 11 11
[END]
[RECRUITMENTS ~ Advise respondent of date and time of group:]
Date : 16 September 2002
Time: 6:30pm
Place : Hides Consulting Group Pty Ltd
2nd Floor Ltd
681 Murray Street
West Perth 6005
(Located between Colin & Havelock Streets on the right hand side opposite Thelma Street)
[RECRUITMENTS ~ Respondent Details]
Respondent Name:
Address:
Telephone Home: ______________________________
Work: ______________________________
Mobile: ______________________________
E-mail Address:
[RECRUITMENTS ~ Concluding Statement]
Can I give you the telephone number of Hides Group…… (9324 1377). It is extremely important that all participants we recruit are able to attend the session. If for whatever reason you are unable to attend, can you please call our office as soon as possible.
Thank you for your time. Just to remind you my name is (……..) from Hides Group. If you have any questions about this focus group you can telephone our office on 9324 1377.
Interviewer’s Name:_________________________________
Interviewer’s Number: |_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|
Date of Interview: _______ / / 2002
Interviewer Declaration
“I certify this is a correct record of the interview which has been completed in accordance with my interviewing guidelines and conducted according to the ICC/ESOMAR International Code of Marketing and Social Research Practice.
Signed: _____________________________________”
Participant Types
Type 1: Single parent with child / children.
Type 2: Seniors / Retirees
Type 3: Parents with youngest child aged 12 years or under.
Type 4: Parents with youngest child aged 13 years or older and still living at home.
Type 5: 1st time home owners / Young couples without children.
APPENDIX 2
|
Pre-Focus Group Questionnaire
|
City of Wanneroo
Pre-Focus Group Brief Questionnaire
Please take a few minutes to complete this short survey before our focus group session commences. Pass the completed survey to your moderator or hostess. Your responses will be treated entirely confidentially and will not be discussed in the group session.
1. On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very unimportant” and 5 is “very important,” how important do you believe it is for City residents to be involved in major decisions made by Council?
Very Unimportant 1
Unimportant 2
Neither unimportant nor important 3
Important 4
Very Important 5
Don’t know 6
2. Can you specify the 3 issues you believe have had or are having the greatest impact on the City’s Community?
3. Can you suggest what would be the best way Council could gather residents’ views about City issues when making major decisions?
4. On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very uncertain” and 5 is “very certain,” how certain are you about the following:
(Very Uncertain) (Uncertain) (Neither) (Certain) (Very Certain) (Don’t Know)
The best means of contacting 1 2 3 4 5 6
Council
regarding City issues
I would like to comment on.
When the best times are to 1 2 3 4 5 6
contact the City about City issues.
Who I should speak with 1 2 3 4 5 6
regarding my views.
5. On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is “very uninterested” and 5 is “very interested,” how interested are you personally in being involved in decision-making for the City?
Very Uninterested 1
Uninterested 2
Neither uninterested nor interested 3
Interested 4
Very Interested 5
Don’t know 6
·································································································
Some basic information about you….
6. Your gender:
Male 1
Female 2
7. Are you a first time home owner?
Yes 1
No 2
8. Which of the following best describes your household?
Single without children 1
Single with youngest child aged 12 years or less 2
Single with youngest child aged 13 years or more and living at home 3
Young couple without children 4
Couple with youngest child aged 12 years or less 5
Couple with youngest child aged 13 years or more and living at home 6
Later family with no children living at home 7
Older couple without children 8
9. Do you work and / or own a business in the City?
Yes, work in the City, but do not own a business in the City 1
Yes, work in the City and own a business in the City 2
No, do not work in the City, but own a business in the City 3
No, do not work in the City and do not own a business in the City 4
Thank you for spending the time to complete this short survey.
APPENDIX 3
|
Focus Group
|
2002 136A City of Wanneroo
Focus Group ~ Discussion Guide
Introduction
· Introduce focus group discussion and group moderator
· Introduce focus group room.
· Participants to introduce themselves. Where reside and household structure.
· Overall purpose of discussion group.
· Confirm understanding of consultation.
Past involvement in consultation
1 Has anyone in the group been involved in community consultation or know of anyone who has been involved?
Yes - been involved?
w Through what means were they involved?
w Do you think your involvement was productive? Worthwhile?
w What was particularly good?
w How could the involvement been improved?
No - not been involved?
w What would be the main reasons for why you have not been involved?
w Are you aware of consultation callings?
Types of Decisions Council should get feedback on
2 What would you say are some of the changes or decisions you think are important for the City residents to be involved in before Council makes decisions?
w City on the whole.
w Change or development in immediate neighbourhood would have liked to be involved in.
w Local parks
w Public accessways
w Community centres
w Youth issues
w Commercial developments
w Road works
Satisfaction with City’s consultation efforts
3 Are you aware of any means through which the City has sort the opinions of residents regarding major decisions?
4 Do you consider the City of Wanneroo to be proactive in gaining opinions and perceptions of residents? Why do you say that?
Means of consultation
What would you consider to be the most effective way Council and City residents could consult Community issues. Why?
Should the same means of consultation be used all of the time or different means for different issues?
Can you think of any examples of how Council could consult with the Community about specific types of issues?
When would telephone surveys be a preferred option?
What about written surveys?
Public meetings?
How about a panel of residents who are contacted on a regular basis and part of the decision making?
Further Comments? Client’s Questions / Clarifications
Are you aware of any means through which the City has sort the opinions of residents regarding major decisions?
Satisfaction with City’s consultation efforts
5 Are you aware of any means through which the City has sort the opinions of residents regarding major decisions?
6 Do you consider the City of Wanneroo to be proactive in gaining opinions and perceptions of residents? Why do you say that?
Means of consultation
What would you consider to be the most effective way Council and City residents could consult Community issues. Why?
Should the same means of consultation be used all of the time or different means for different issues?
Can you think of any examples of how Council could consult with the Community about specific types of issues?
When would telephone surveys be a preferred option?
What about written surveys?
Public meetings?
How about a panel of residents who are contacted on a regular basis and part of the decision making?
Further Comments? Client’s Questions / Clarifications
Are you aware of any means through which the City has sort the opinions of residents regarding major decisions?
DISCUSSION PAPER
Draft
Community Consultation and Participation Policy
What is consultation?
Consultation is all about involving people and communities in decision making.
It recognises that the community has a right to:
· Express their views regarding Council policies and services
· Participate in decisions affecting their daily lives
· Obtain information regarding Council priorities, expenditure and programs
Why consult?
A team approach is best…
Community consultation and participation enables Council to work with the community to make important decisions that best meet needs, both now and in planning for the future.
It provides elected members and Council staff with the opportunity to:
· Listen to the community
· Record what was said
· Develop ideas together, especially through looking at options
· Build consensus on an approach
Consultation ensures that:
· The community is aware of and involved in the development of policies and plans, services development and reviews and feels a sense of ownership of the outcomes
· Council is open and accountable in its decision making, resource management and expenditure
When will we consult?
Council will consult with residents when;
· The future use of a significant area of land within the City is being decided
· There is, or is likely to be, strong community concern or interest in the issue
· The proposals before the Council are anticipated to have a significant impact on the economy, lifestyle, amenity and/or environment of the City or its residents
· Government agencies, other than Council, have a stated interest in any policy or plans being considered
· The resolution of an issue or implementation of a proposal is likely to require a substantial redirection of ratepayer funds either by up front or ongoing costs
· Information is needed by Councillors or staff about community needs, priorities or values to ensure planning is appropriate and responsive
· The Council has statutory obligations to consult with the community
· The Council wishes to ensure that minority or disadvantaged groups have information about, and access to, the services and programs of Council
Examples of the type of issues on which Council will consult with the community include:
· The positioning of new playground equipment or features in parks
· Any changes to the way in which public open spaces and parks are used or function
· The development of new community services and facilities
· New or changed roads or the closure/development of public access ways
· Changes to the way land is used throughout the City of Wanneroo
· The development of policies and strategies affecting the future development of the City
It is important for the community to know that any consultation undertaken by Council will be completed BEFORE a decision is made. Consultation and a commitment to community involvement is not effective or appropriate when;
· A final decision has already been made, by Council or another agency
· Council cannot influence a decision to be made by another agency or party
· There is insufficient time available to consult, due to legislative, resource or legal constraints.
In these events Council will always endeavour to provide information relating to the reasons why Council could not seek community consultation on the issue.
In some circumstances, Council will carry out initial communication/notification procedures for regular services eg. Traffic design or land development, and may become aware through responses received that the community or key stakeholders have strong feelings concerning the issue. Consultation processes such as focus groups, public meetings, mediation, or community forums are then options to be considered to resolve the issue(s).
How will we consult?
In undertaking any consultation process Council will be committed to the following principles
Participation by:
· Recognising that the City of Wanneroo community includes everyone who lives, works, or visits here who all have an equal right to contribute to decision making
· Respecting the diversity of the Wanneroo community and that different kinds of contributions will be received from different sections of the community
· Acknowledging that affected groups and interested parties can select their own representatives to work with Council
· Creating an environment where people can feel safe expressing their views
The minimisation of barriers to participation by:
· Making it as easy as possible for those affected to take part in consultation
· Being sensitive to the needs of all sectors of the community and providing measures for them to contribute fully to consultation. This includes special needs related to language or culture, disability, transport or any other issue affecting participation
A clear focus and purpose by:
· Informing the community clearly and honestly what the consultation is about and what it aims to achieve
· Stating Council’s role in the consultation and the role of other participants
· Telling participants how their feedback will be used
· Not using the information gathered for any other purpose, unless the community has approved this use before, during or after the consultation
· Providing information regarding the final decision or outcome to all participants
· Working towards outcomes that have broad community support
Making information readily available by:
· Making sure that information relevant to the consultation is accessible before time for participants
· Ensuring that any information provided will be accurate, comprehensive and easy to understand
· Taking into account the needs of different language groups if appropriate to the consultation and resources are available
· Letting the community know if any information cannot be disclosed because it is commercially sensitive or of a personal nature
Allowing enough time by:
· Ensuring there is sufficient time and opportunity for those interested to take part in consultation and contribute
· Setting reasonable timelines
· Ensuring that time is available to debate or investigate any important issues that arise
Listening and responding to participants and the community by:
· Respecting the diverse range of views and interests that a are represented
· Being open to new ideas and altering a proposed course of action
· Making all reasonable attempts to reach an acceptable solution
· When a decision has been made, informing all participants and the community. If there is a difference between the input received and during consultation and the final decision, the reasons for this will also be provided
Considering additional input by:
· Allowing residents to officially request informal or formal meetings regarding the issue during the consultation period
· Acknowledging and including any petitions or other forms of representation regarding the issue received during the consultation period
· Conducting, where requested and possible, any electors meetings during the consultation period and utilising information from this process to assist in decision making
Being efficient, responsible and accountable by:
· Balancing the responsibility to consult with affected parties with the need to manage ratepayer funds prudently
· Carefully costing and considering all major consultation exercises
· Evaluating each consultation and resultant decision making process, to continually improve practices and procedures
How will we know if our consultation processes are working?
To assist the City in finding the most effective ways to consult the community, this policy provides for the review of consultation processes utilising a variety of methods including:
· Talking to participants during and after consultation about the strategies and processes used
· Measuring community satisfaction with consultation processes on an annual basis, as a key performance indicator for the City
· Staff evaluation of consultation strategies, submitted to the Community Consultation Review Panel after each project is completed
What does this mean for residents? What can they expect?
These principles mean, if a decision directly affecting residents, their immediate community or the wider City of Wanneroo is to be made, that residents can expect:
· To be informed of the way in which they can contribute to the decision
· To be able to participate in consultation, regardless of their cultural or linguistic background or any disability
· To be provided with enough information about the issue prior to having their input
· To have a reasonable time period to consider the information and make contributions
· To have their views listened to and acknowledged throughout the consultation
· To be informed regarding the final decision or outcome and the reasons for making this decision
· To be able to suggest or request additional forms of consultation with elected representatives throughout the consultation period if they feel they are necessary
How will the consultation process work?
Consultation processes and methods are changing, as are the types of decisions local government makes as part of their operations.
As a general guide regarding the types of consultation and communication that will be required for certain types of decisions, the table on the following page will be utilised.
Key definitions for the types of consultation to be utilised for certain types of decisions are provided below.
Type of consultation/participation
|
Definition |
Information Sharing and Awareness
|
Providing information to increase resident awareness and use of Council services and facilities |
Targeted community consultation
|
Sharing and obtaining information from those residents directly affected or with a keen interest/point of view regarding an issue |
Full community consultation
|
Sharing and obtaining information from all City of Wanneroo residents or a statistically valid sample of residents on a particular issue |
|
|
Level of Community Participation |
|
|||
Category |
Area |
No or Limited consultation
|
Information sharing and education |
Targeted community consultation |
Full community consultation |
Examples of Processes |
1 |
Internal Council operations
Examples: Human Resources (staff recruitment) Operational/Financial Management
|
|
|
|
|
Employment procedures, position descriptions and organisational structures |
2 |
Council Programs and Activities
Examples: Building approval services Dog registration Aged and Disabled Services\ Youth Services
|
|
|
|
|
Service brochures and pamphlets Press releases Public notices “What’s Happening in Wanneroo” Community Directory of Council Services
|
3 |
Statutory Processes
Examples: Rezoning applications Structure Plan Applications/Amendments Development Applications Subdivision applications |
|
|
|
|
Public meetings Workshops with stakeholders Requests for submissions and comment (advertised)
|
4 |
Local or District Issues
Examples:
Playground developments Road developments Changes to Public Open Space, Recreational areas, Community Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Letters to surrounding/adjoining residents Small focus groups/workshops Issue based surveys
|
5 |
Policy and Strategy Development – Issue Based
Examples:
Rural Strategy Commercial Centres Strategy Community Funding Policy Dry/Irrigated Parks Policy
|
|
|
|
|
Public meetings/forums Requests for submissions and/or comment Issue based workshops Surveys (issue or service based) Reference groups involving Government, industry and community groups
|
6 |
General Policy and Strategy Development, Introduction of new Services Examples: City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan Regional Planning District Planning Scheme Introduction of new services eg. Safer Citizens Principal Activities Plan |
|
|
|
|
Public meetings/forums City wide surveys Workshops Focus groups City listening posts Plans/documents available for comment Request for submissions and comment (advertised) |
To make sure that each consultation process is appropriate to the type of decision to be made and the people that will be affected, a consultation strategy for each individual consultation in Categories 4 to 6 will be developed and ratified by a Community Consultation Review Panel.
The Community Consultation Review Panel will consist of:
· The Chief Executive Officer of nominated representative
· The Directors of each City Directorate or their nominated representatives
· Manager, Strategic and Executive Services
· Social Planning Co-ordinator
· Strategic Planner
· Manager, Marketing Services
The Community Consultation Review Panel will be responsible for:
· Providing advice and assistance to staff regarding appropriate methods of community consultation
· Receiving community consultation strategies from Council officers
· Assessing these strategies against the principles of this policy
· Ratifying strategies and referring them to Council or the CEO for endorsement
· Evaluating consultation processes
· Reporting to Council on a quarterly basis regarding community consultation strategies undertaken and their effectiveness
· Maintaining a record of all consultation undertaken by the City
· Contributing to the development of new consultation processes that uphold the principles of this policy and make it easier for all sections of the community to participate in decision making
· A general review of the procedures for consultation in Categories 1 to 3
The Panel will brief the Mayor and Council’s Policy Forum regarding proposed consultation strategies for individual projects in order to receive comments and input.
Operation of the Policy
To ensure that this policy is upheld throughout the organisation, Council will be committed to:
· Providing adequate resources for consultation
· Providing staff with appropriate training and resources to develop and implement consultation strategies
Draft Community Consultation and Participation Policy
FEEDBACK FORM – HAVE YOUR SAY
Please complete this form and return it to the City of Wanneroo by Friday 13 September 2002 OR bring it along to one of the public workshops on the policy.
What do you think the best methods to consult with residents of the City? (please circle as many as applicable)
1……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
3……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
What do you think are the key issues or decisions made by Council that require consultation?
1……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
3……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
4……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Has Council consulted with you in the last 12 months? (please circle)
Yes
No
If YES, what issues or decisions has Council talked to you about in the last 12 months?
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
How effective do you think the consultation was on this occasion? (please circle)
1 Very ineffective
2 Ineffective
3 Neither
4 Effective
5 Very effective
The draft community consultation and participation policy provides a general framework for the City to follow when talking to you in the future.
What do you think is the most important feature or part of the policy?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
How effective do you think are the following types of consultation?
Type |
Very ineffective |
Ineffective |
Neither |
Effective |
Very effective |
Don’t know |
Notices in the local paper |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Workshops in the area that is affected by the decision
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Leaflets or pamphlets delivered in the mail |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Public meetings in central locations
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Information in public places like libraries and shopping centres
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Websites where you can comment
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Do you have any other comments you would like to make about Council’s consultation processes or the draft policy?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Thankyou for completing this feedback form
Please return it to the City of Wanneroo in person, by post or fax.
City of Wanneroo
Locked Bag 1
WANNEROO WA 6946
Ph: 9405 5000
Fax: 9405 5097
Comments close on 13 September 2002
File Ref: S09/0066V01
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 05 November 2002
File Name: CCouncil Meeting Dates and Times.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the schedule of meeting dates for 2003.
Background
Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on the 27 November 2001 reviewed its three weekly meeting cycle comprising a briefing session (week one) full council meeting (week two) and Staff\Councillor Policy Forum (week three) and resolved to adopt this cycle for the twelve-month period to December 2002.
Detail
The above meeting cycle has adequately met the needs of the City for 2002 and it is not proposed to recommend a further review at this stage.
Comment
Detailed in the Officers Recommendation is the suggested Meeting Schedule for 2003 for Council approval.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. CONTINUE with the three weekly meeting cycle comprising a briefing session (week one) full council meeting (week two) and Councillor/Staff Policy Forum (week three) for a further twelve month period and Audit Committee meetings, comprising all councillors, to meet on an as needs basis during 2003;
2. ADOPT the following meeting schedule for 2003:-
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
JANUARY – DECEMBER 2003
Full Council Briefing Session |
Full Council Meeting |
Policy Forum |
28 January |
04 February |
11 February |
18 February |
25 February |
04 March |
11 March |
18 March |
25 March |
01 April |
08 April |
15 April |
22 April |
29 April |
06 May |
13 May |
20 May |
27 May |
03 June |
10 June |
17 June |
24 June |
01 July |
08 July |
15 July |
22 July |
29 July |
05 August |
12 August |
19 August |
26 August |
02 September |
09 September |
16 September |
23 September |
30 September |
07 October |
14 October |
21 October |
28 October |
04 November |
11 November |
18 November |
25 November |
02 December |
09 December |
16 December |
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0056V01
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 05 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
File Name: CDelegation of Authority to Mayor and Chief Executive Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rharkins Date 23 October 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To enable the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to make decisions on behalf of Council during the Christmas/New Year recess in the event of an emergency.
Background
The December Ordinary Council meeting is scheduled for 17 December 2002 and the next meeting will be on 04 February 2003. This is a common time for elected members to be absent or unavailable for council meetings. Should a decision be required during this period that does not require and Absolute or Special Majority under the Local Government Act 1995, or any other act empowering the local government, it is suggested that the Council delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to make any decisions on behalf of Council on the basis that he first consult with the Mayor (or in his absence, the Deputy Mayor) and both persons are in agreement. Such decisions would be documented and reported to Councillors.
Detail
The purpose of the delegation is to avoid having to delay matters, which may come before the City or require a decision, which in the view of the Chief Executive Officer and Mayor (or in his absence, the Deputy Mayor), would be supported by the majority of elected members. The delegation would commence from 18 December 2002 and conclude on 03 February 2003.
During this period, the Director of Corporate Services is being recommended to Council for appointment as Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Comment
This is a common procedure that is provided for in most local governments and has been supported by this Council in previous years.
Statutory Compliance
Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows Council to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer any of its powers or the discharge of any of its duties under the Act except those powers or duties that are specified in Section 5.43 of the Act which include:-
a) any power or duty that requires an absolute or special majority of Council
b) accepting a tender in excess of $50,000.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, DELEGATE to the Chief Executive Officer the power to make decisions on behalf of the local government with the exemption of those powers or decisions that are detailed in Section 5.43 of the Local Government Act 1995, commencing on 18 December 2002 and concluding on 03 February 2003. The delegation is subject to any decisions being made by agreement with the Mayor (or in his absence the Deputy Mayor) and a report on those decisions being provided to Council at the conclusion of the delegation period.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0066V01
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Meeting Date: 15 October 2002
Attachments: Nil
File Name: CChristmas Close Down of the Administration Building.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the closure of the City of Wanneroo Civic Centre over the Christmas period being from 1.00 pm on Tuesday 24 December 2002 and for the whole day on Friday 27 December 2002.
Background
On Friday, 21 December 2001 the City offered employees the opportunity to attend a Christmas function at the Wanneroo Bowling Club from 12.30 pm to close of business. However, each Manager was required to ensure that all essential services were still provided until close of business (5.00 pm).
On Monday, 24 December 2001 the Civic Centre and Aquamotion were open for providing customer service until close of business.
Comment
Council is asked to allow the Civic Centre to be closed at 1.00 pm to close of business on Tuesday 24 December 2002, so that all employees can attend a Christmas Function. Employees will be required to attend this function or can leave work at 1.00 pm and take ½ day annual leave or other leave as appropriate.
This year, due to Christmas Day and Boxing Day falling on a Wednesday and Thursday, employees are required to return to work for one day only prior to the weekend. It is envisaged that minimal productivity will be achieved on Friday, 27 December 2002 and accordingly it is recommended that non-essential employees and library staff are permitted to take this day off.
Staff will be required to take the 27 December 2002 as either annual leave or if they work a nine day fortnight roster an accumulated rostered day off, however, staff may apply for a day-in-lieu (New Years Day and Easter Tuesday) if unused for 2002.
This proposal will assist the organisation to reduce annual leave liabilities, support the Fitness for Work procedure in ensuring employees are supported to take recreational leave and provide an opportunity for all employees within different Directorates to get together socially and the City to provide effective communication on the progress of the Strategic Plan and other important issues.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AGREE to the closure of the City of Wanneroo from 1.00 pm on Tuesday 24 December 2002 to allow employees to attend the Christmas function.
2. AGREE to the closure of the City of Wanneroo on Friday 27 December 2002, and PERMIT all non-essential staff and library staff to take this day off as either annual leave or an accumulated rostered day off, or if required, a day-in-lieu.
3. ADVERTISE the opening hours of the Administration Building & Recreation Facilities over the Christmas and New Year break clearly to the general public.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S24/0023V01
File Name: AAAppointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by Charles Johnson Date 21 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Charles Johnson Date 21 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Charles Johnson Date 21 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Charles Johnson
Meeting Date: 05 November 2002
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Appointment of an Acting Chief Executive Officer from 25 December 2002 to 26 January 2003.
Background
During the Christmas/New Year period and up to and including 26 January 2003, the Chief Executive Officer is intending to take annual leave.
Detail
Under the Local Government Act (1995), Council is required to appoint both the Chief Executive Officer and any person acting in this position. The Chief Executive Officer requests approval to appoint the Director Corporate Services, Mr Bruce Perryman, as Acting Chief Executive Officer from 25 December 2002 to 26 January 2003 inclusive.
It is not intended to backfill the position of Director
Corporate Services during the period
Mr Perryman is undertaking the role of Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Executive leave will be managed over the Christmas/New Year period so that
services are not disrupted.
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act (1995) s5.3.6 requires that Council appoint the Chief Executive Officer. The Department of Local Government has confirmed that this also extends to the appointment of an Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council appoint the Director Corporate Services, Mr Bruce Perryman, to the position of Acting Chief Executive Officer for the period 25 December 2002 to 26 January 2003 inclusive.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Name: ACr M Greirson.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by Mike Cole Date 25 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 25 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 25 October 2002
File Ref: S28/0002V01
Responsible Officer: Nil
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
That Council requires Administration to review the format of its Rate Notices for 2003/2004 to minimise the potential for confusion in relation to the due dates for payment.
Detail
I feel that the way our rate notices were presented left a lot to be desired, having looked at accounts from other organisations they all clearly state date in big letters these being Atlanta Gas, Water Corporation, Western Power, Telstra, Optus, Foxtel, Insurance accounts either for home or car and of course Transport for car Registration, where dates are clearly set out that the accounts have to be paid by this date, certainly there is no time marked on these accounts but some of them do carry a penalty for late payment, but also a time factor, I would have thought that as long as an account is paid on the said date which starts at 0000 hours and finishes at 23.59 hours 59 seconds then a person paying on this due date would be accepted, I urge the Council to look at this and try to come up with a better deal for Ratepayers next year.
Voting Requirements
Simple majority
Recommendation
That Council requires Administration to review the format of its Rate Notices for 2003/2004 to minimise the potential for confusion in relation to the due dates for payment.
Administration Comment
The Rate Notices will require to be redesigned to take into account the proposed Emergency Services Levy (ESL). In addition, the due dates will be in-line with the payment options adopted by Council as part of the 2003/2004 Budget.
File Ref: RL0021
Responsible Officer: Nil
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
File Name: ACr J Hughes.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To request the permanent closure of Public Accessway Connell Way through Ferrara Reserve.
Background
The Connell Way PAW has been a notorious Accessway for countless years. Mrs Isobel Scott shares the west boundary and Homeswest the east. This accessway has been submitted for closure on several occasions but has been unsuccessful attaining closure due to access to the POS and the Montrose Primary School. The adjoining PAW Connell Way thru to Marangaroo Dr has already attained closure by this Council and therefore it only serves the residents in the immediate area.
Detail
Mrs Scott has for 25 years been burdened with the continual expense of repairs to the boundary fence as no other organisation takes any responsibility for damage.
DOLA and the City of Wanneroo have for years enjoyed the freedom of never having to shoulder any of the anti social behaviour wilful damage or criminal behaviour such as theft and drug dealing associated with this PAW either socially or economically.
General discussion was entered into with the New North to try to accommodate a safer access through the refurbishment process to create an open planned route to maintain access through to the reserve between existing properties marked for refurbishment in the near future. However recent correspondence has not been favourable.
As recently as Wednesday 17th October approx 5.00am during a police chase a pursued vehicle exited out through the public accessway causing trauma to the adjoining residents and leaving considerable damage in its wake, as the accessway is the standard width and fenced on both sides.
No responsibility for damages or the anti social behaviour is borne by the ruling authorities.
Mrs Scott lives in a constant state of anxiety and fear and is solely responsible economically for any past and continuing damages sustained to the boundary fencing and property due to the existence of the accessway. This is a very burdensome position for any resident.
Mrs Scott is not able financially to simply sell up and move to another location and pass the problems on to another family. Residents should not be in the position where they become the singular bearers of responsibility due the decisions made by those who need not tolerate society’s shortcomings
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Support the permanent closure for the Accessway Connell Way through to Ferrara Park.
2. Petition the Dept of Planning and Infrastructure to permit closure.
3. Enter into discussion with the New North to further the investigation of safe access through to the Ferrara Park POS through the refurbishment programme.
4. Write to the local member for assistance to secure the closure of the PAW.
Administration Comment
At the time the closure of this PAW was last considered by Council in October 2000, closure was opposed by the then Department of Transport but not opposed by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).
The Department of Transport objected on the basis that closure would inhibit pedestrian and bicycle access to Ferrara Reserve and Montrose Primary School by increasing distances by more than 500 metres.
The WAPC noted the social problems being experienced by residents and took the view that even though the PAW forms part of the pedestrian cyclist network its closure would not cause a great increase in distance to the recreation reserve.
The Department of Transport has since been incorporated into the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI). Recent changes to Government land planning policy makes it essential to obtain support from the WAPC to any proposed closure. The DPI provides advice to WAPC on road and PAW closure matters, and the support for closure from WAPC to a new request for closure cannot be presumed.
For a new application for closure to be viewed favourably it would need to be demonstrated to WAPC that the nature and number of anti-social incidents that occur override the access function of the PAW. Accordingly, it would be beneficial if the City undertook consultation with all of the residents in the area and in particular, Connell Way to indicate local support for closure of the PAW.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
File Ref: S07/0005V01
File Name: SCInvbyC.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 2 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Level 1 Approval by rharkins Date 24 October 2002
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
· (a) a matter affecting an employee or employees;
· (b) the personal affairs of any person;
· (d) legal advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting;
The next Ordinary Councillors Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday, 19 November 2002, to be held at the Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
File Ref: TPS/0009
File Name: BAAmend9.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by sb Date 04 November 2002
Level 4 Approval by sb Date 22 August 2002
Level 3 Approval by sb Date 19 August 2002
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 15 August 2002
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Consideration of submissions received following close of advertising of proposed Amendment No. 9 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2).
Applicant |
N/A |
Owner |
Peet and Company Ltd ATF Yatala Unit Trust |
Location |
Lot 9002, Clarkson Avenue, Tapping |
Site Area |
244.3142 ha |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Background
At its meeting of 18 December 2001 (item LR01-12/01), Council resolved to prepare Amendment No. 9 to DPS2 to include the presently unsubdivided balance of the Peet & Co. landholding within Carramar and Tapping as a new East Wanneroo Cell (No. 9) to be subject to infrastructure contribution arrangements consistent with the existing arrangements for Cells 1 to 8 in East Wanneroo. This was essentially to enable the City to construct Joondalup Drive from its present eastern end within the Carramar locality to the northern boundary of the Yatala landholding within a much shorter timeframe than has been indicated by the developer pursuant to a legal agreement which presently exists between the developer and this City.
At its meeting of 19 March 2002 (item PD07-03/02) Council considered advice from the WA Planning Commission that it consented to the advertising of Amendment No. 9 for public submissions, subject to a number of modifications being made (to its satisfaction) to the Amendment document. Council resolved to proceed with Amendment No. 9 and to make the modifications required by the Commission. The Amendment documents were accordingly modified and submitted to the Commission for it to confirm that the modifications had been satisfactorily undertaken.
On 19 June 2002, the Commission advised that the modifications had been satisfactorily undertaken and that advertising of Amendment No. 9 could proceed.
Detail
Advertising of Amendment No. 9 was undertaken for a 42 day period (as required by the Commission) which concluded on 6 August 2002.
Consultation
The amendment was advertised by means of:
· advertisements placed in the local newspapers;
· on-site signs placed on Joondalup Drive in Carramar, and on Pinjar Road, just south of the Banksia Grove residential area;
· letters sent to the main landowners involved, being Peet & Co. and Homeswest
· letters sent to the following agencies (as required by the Commission): Main Roads Western Australia; Education Department; Ministry for Housing.
Comment
Assessment of Submissions
Twenty four submissions have been received in response to the advertising of Amendment No. 9. Attachment No. 1 summarises the submissions received and includes comments and recommendations in respect to each submission.
Negotiations with Peet & Co. and Landstart
Peet & Co. and Landstart had been negotiating for a considerable time prior to initiation of Amendment No. 9 regarding the possibility of an arrangement between the two developers to facilitate the early linking of Joondalup Drive. Amendment No. 9 was initiated as the developers were unable to reach agreement.
Subsequent to initiation of Amendment No. 9, a new round of negotiation has occurred, facilitated by City Administration. The outcome has been that the parties have agreed in principle to the construction of Joondalup Drive within two years, subject to a new legal agreement being entered into by the parties (refer Attachment Nos. 2 and 3). While the precise details of this agreement are yet to be resolved, it should be noted that the construction of Joondalup Drive would be unlikely to have been finalised any earlier than 18 months under the proposed Town Planning Scheme Amendment No. 9. Given that a new legal agreement will set out the new obligations of the parties in respect to the construction of Joondalup Drive and will not require any substantial administration or management by the City, it is believed that this would be a more simpler and preferable approach than that proposed by way of the amendment.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Joondalup Drive extension be facilitated through this agreement approach rather than the Amendment No. 9 approach.
Other Comments:
1. As has been noted in Submission No. 10 from John Chapman Town Planning Consultant, at the time that Amendment No. 9 was initiated in December 2001, Joondalup Drive had been constructed as far east as Cheriton Drive in Carramar. Peet & Co. is currently extending the road a further 350m east, to its proposed intersection with Waldburg Drive.
2. Further examination of the current DPS2 provisions (since the initiation of Amendment No, 9) has indicated that should the amendment be progressed, it should include provision for modification of Clause 9.12.7 of DPS2 (relating to appeal provisions) to include reference to proposed Cell No. 9, to maintain a consistency in approach between proposed Cell 9 and the existing East Wanneroo Cells.
3. Although only a relatively small number of submissions supporting this amendment have been received, Council would be aware that several petitions have been received, seeking the early construction of Joondalup Drive. It would be appropriate for Council to be mindful of this in considering the submissions received, and in advising the WA Planning Commission of Council’s resolution of this matter, to also remind the WA Planning Commission and the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure of these petitions.
Statutory Compliance
The advertising of Amendment No. 9 has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations, 1967 (as amended).
Pursuant to regulations 17(1)(a) and 25 (1)(fb), Council was required (unless an extension of time is approved by the WA Planning Commission) to consider the submissions received within 42 days of the close of advertising period, which was 17 September 2002. However, approval of the WA Planning Commission has been given for the period for consideration of submissions to be extended to 8 November 2002.
Town Planning Regulation 17 (1) requires Council to consider the submissions and in respect of each submission consider whether the Amendment should be modified accordingly or whether that submission should be rejected.
Regulation 17 (2) requires that Council, having considered the submissions, shall pass a resolution either:
(a) that the Amendment be adopted with or without modification; or
(b) that it does not wish to proceed with the Amendment.
Regulation 18 (1) requires that Council, within 28 days of passing one of the above resolutions, (including (b)) forwards the Amendment documents to the WA Planning Commission together with:
(a) a schedule of submissions received;
(b) its recommendations on the submissions;
(c) particulars of any modifications to the Amendment recommended;
(d) a copy of the Council resolution on the matter;
(e) if the resolution was as per 17(2)(b), a summary of the reasons why Council does not wish to proceed with the Amendment.
Strategic Implications
The early provision of the Joondalup Drive link to Banksia Grove will be supportive of the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan which refers to the provision of quality services and infrastructure.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The letter from Phillips Fox has raised the possibility of Peet & Co. taking legal action against this City, with its attendant financial implications. Advice on this matter has been sought from the City’s legal advisors, however recent discussions with Peet & Co. have indicated that provided an acceptable resolution can be reached on the Joondalup Drive issue, possible legal action previously raised shall not be considered.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17 (2), RESOLVES that it does not wish to proceed with Amendment No. 9 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 as Peet & Co. and Landstart have now reached agreement on an arrangement to facilitate the early construction of Joondalup Drive and this arrangement will be a far simpler and straightforward way of dealing with the matter.
2. ENDORSES the comments and recommendations made in this report regarding the submissions received on Amendment No. 9.
3. REQUIRES that in submitting the amendment documents to the WA Planning Commission, City Administration advises the Commission that although only a relatively small number of submissions have been received in response to advertising of this amendment, a number of petitions have previously been received which demonstrate a high degree of community support for the early construction of Joondalup Drive through to Banksia Grove, such early construction being enabled through the proposed developer agreement.
ATTACHMENT 1
ASSESSMENT OF SUBMISSIONS
Twenty four submissions have been received in response to the advertising of Amendment No. 9. The following summarises the submissions received and includes comments and recommendations in respect to each submission.
Submission 1
Summary:
The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who agrees with the proposed amendment.
Comment:
Consistent with Council’s decision to seek amendment.
Recommendation:
That this submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 2
Summary:
The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports the amendment as it will be a lot quicker and safer to travel to Joondalup via the extension of Joondalup Drive.
Comment:
Travel from Banksia Grove to Joondalup (presumably referring to the Joondalup City Centre) will indeed be made quicker and safer through the provision of the Joondalup Drive link to Banksia Grove
Recommendation:
That this submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 3
Summary:
The submittor lives in the Lake Adams Special Rural area who advises that as a resident of the Pinjar Road area, the submittor has witnessed the increasing traffic on Pinjar Road with the attendant dangers and noise. The submittor supports Amendment No. 9 which is aimed at expediting the completion of the Joondalup Drive extension.
Comment:
Early extension of Joondalup Drive (enabled by Amendment No. 9) will assist in reducing the problems referred to in relation to Pinjar Road.
Recommendation:
That this submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 4
Summary:
Main Roads Western Australia advises that it has no objection to Amendment No. 9.
Comment:
This submission is in response to the City’s referral to it of the proposed amendment as required by the WA Planning Commission.
Recommendation:
That this submission be noted.
Submission 5
Summary:
A letter has been received from solicitors Phillips Fox, on behalf of Peet & Co. This asserts (amongst other things) that Amendment No. 9 is not a proper or valid exercise of the City’s powers; that it is consequently ultra vires (beyond the power of the City); and an undertaking is therefore sought that the City will take immediate steps to withdraw the amendment.
The reasons for the above assertion are given in the letter from Phillips Fox which forms Appendix 1 to this Attachment. A subsequent letter from Phillips Fox (refer Appendix 2) provides further information by the submittor.
Comment:
Amendment No. 9 is not considered ultra vires and the reason for this is given in the City’s response to Phillips Fox which forms Appendix 3 to this Attachment. Advice is also currently being sought from Council’s legal advisors (McLeod & Co), who have confirmed this view.
It may be noted in the attached exchange of letters that Peet & Co. objects strongly to the view expressed in the Scheme Amendment Report that the subdivision staging was not ‘triggering’ the legal agreement obligations which require construction of Joondalup Drive. The City’s letter of reply advises of this City’s concern that Peet & Co. has taken such umbrage on this matter, and that as the subject of the statement is not central to the rationale for the proposed amendment, the City would be willing to consider deleting this paragraph from the Scheme Amendment Report.
A statement made in the Phillips Fox letter dated 5 August 2002 (refer Appendix 2) is also considered to warrant particular comment. Paragraph 4 of that letter includes a statement that: “My client does not accept that sufficient justification has been given for proceeding at this stage with a link to Banksia Grove as this area is already well serviced with road connections, and the purported justifications for the amendment do not withstand close analysis.” The Amendment Report includes the following description of benefits seen to be associated with the early construction of the Joondalup Drive link and this is considered to provide sufficient justification on the matter:
“1. It will provide Banksia Grove residents with a more direct and safer route to Wanneroo Road and to Joondalup Drive (west of Wanneroo Road) which in turn will mean easier access to the Joondalup City Centre and its many facilities and services, the northern suburbs railway and the Mitchell Freeway.
2. It will provide a quicker and safer route for buses serving Banksia Grove.
3. It will reduce the amount of traffic needing to use Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue, both of which are presently not constructed to a standard suitable for carrying high traffic volumes. This will mean a reduced likelihood of serious traffic accidents on these roads.
4. It will provide a further route for traffic associated with Barbagallo Raceway, especially on major race days which presently create significant traffic congestion along Pinjar Road. This in turn presents emergency vehicle access problems which have been identified in recent risk assessment studies as urgently requiring resolving.
5. It will provide an additional emergency access route for both the Banksia Grove and Carramar residential areas, particularly in the event of threat of bush fire.
6. It will mean that the Education Department will be able to deal with the Carramar and Banksia Grove estates as a more effective potential primary school catchment when it comes to plan the provision of a permanent primary school to serve those locations. (Banksia Grove primary school children are currently served by a ‘school-in-houses’ in Banksia Grove; Carramar primary school children are currently served by the Wanneroo Junior Primary School and Wanneroo Primary School).”
Recommendation:
1. Dismiss the request concerning withdrawal of the proposal to facilitate early provision of the Joondalup Drive link.
2. Modify the Scheme Amendment Report to delete the following paragraph:
“As noted above, the legal agreement applying to this area only requires construction of a major road when abutting subdivision is being undertaken. Peet & Co. are now pursuing a subdivision staging strategy whereby they are subdividing land which does not abut Joondalup Drive, thereby avoiding any legal obligation to construct this road at this time”.
Submission 6
Summary:
The Transperth section of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure supports the amendment for the reasons given in Appendix 4.
Comment:
The improvements to the level of public transport service referred to in the submission would be of considerable benefit to the residents of Banksia Grove, and should also benefit Carramar residents.
Recommendation:
That this submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 7
Summary:
The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports Amendment No. 9 because:
1. Joondalup Drive will be a far safer route when travelling between Banksia Grove and Joondalup;
2. Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue are similar to country roads with problems such as poor visibility at night, soft edges and kangaroos;
3. Joondalup Drive would provide a quicker route to Joondalup in the event of family member needing hospital assistance;
4. Travelling an indirect route to Joondalup (as at present) results in a waste of valuable petrol.
5. The intersection of Tumbleweed Drive and Pinjar Road is extremely dangerous with the increased amount of traffic having to use those roads in the absence of the Joondalup Drive link.
Comment:
Reasons 1. – 4. for supporting the amendment are considered valid. The matter of the intersection of Tumbleweed Drive and Pinjar Road is commented upon further in the assessment of Submission No. 9.
Recommendation:
That the submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 8
Summary:
The submittor is a Banksia Grove resident who supports Amendment No. 9 because:
1. At the time of buying a property in Banksia Grove 6 years ago, the real estate agent concerned advised that the Joondalup Drive link would be in place in 2-3 years from that time.
2. In the 6 years living in Banksia Grove, have observed two major bush fires, many fatal car accidents, many native animals being killed on the roads: all because of poor roads planning.
3. The safety of Banksia Grove residents needs to be considered.
Comment:
The above reasons for support of the amendment are considered valid.
Recommendation:
That this submission be upheld, but it noted that it is now intended to achieve the objective sought through an agreement with Peet & Co and Landstart, instead of through DPS2 provisions.
Submission 9
Summary:
Peet & Co. has lodged a submission which strongly objects to the proposed amendment. A copy of the submission forms Appendix 5 to this Attachment. This submission includes an assessment undertaken by engineers Halpern Glick Maunsel (HGM). (Note that City Administration has numbered the paragraphs in the Peet & Co submission for ease of reference).
Comment:
Paragraphs 1-2: Peet & Co. correctly describes the relevant obligations under the Deed and the City’s wish for the road extension to occur faster than would occur under the Deed.
Paragraph 3: Although the road extension may not have been seen by Landstart to be of high enough priority to justify it in meeting the amount of additional cost which would have been entailed in the proposals put to it by Peet & Co., the road extension is seen as a high priority by those who have signed the petitions on the subject received by the City, and by the submittors who support the amendment.
Paragraphs 4 – 5: Council originally sought to include the large proposed urban landholdings north of Clarkson Avenue into the developer contribution system for the total East Wanneroo urban area. However, the then Minister for Planning and the then State Planning Commission did not allow this and instead required that these broadacre areas be excluded from such a system and instead made them subject of a separate deed between the developers and the City. During the Commission’s and Minister’s deliberations on this matter, they were most likely influenced by a submission from the developer which indicated that inclusion of its landholding in the East Wanneroo scheme was not necessary as they intended to enter into their own deed to ensure equitable and timely development of district roads. In the City’s opinion, this has not been the case.
Other high priority areas are the subject of similar developer contribution systems as proposed under Amendment No. 9:
· Marmion Avenue is the subject of the Clarkson-Butler district distributor road infrastructure contribution arrangements (Part 11 of DPS2):
· Ocean Reef Road (to Landsdale) is included as a Cell Work for East Wanneroo Cell 8.
Paragraphs 6 & 9: The Landstart landholding has not been included within the Cell boundary, and the unconstructed portion of Joondalup Drive situated within the Landstart land has not been included as a Cell Work, because Landstart has advised that it will construct the portion of the road within its land once the road has been constructed to its southern boundary.
Paragraphs 7-8: It is agreed that it would be appropriate that the adequacy of the present Pinjar Road-Tumbleweed Drive intersection be reviewed once the timeframe for construction of the Joondalup Drive link is clarified.
Regarding a broader road construction programme being put in place, at this time, the immediate priority is Joondalup Drive and this is where efforts should be focussed. However, it is agreed that in due course it will be desirable for a broader programme to be developed. This would possibly be when Peet & Co. come closer to developing adjacent to the future deviation of Pinjar Road. The linking of the Pinjar Road deviation to Joondalup Drive would be likely to be coordinated with the linking of Joondalup Drive into Neaves Road, and the downgrading (with road closures) of Pinjar Road between Tumbleweed Drive and Neaves Road. These changes will also take the pressure off the Pinjar Road-Tumbleweed Drive intersection.
Paragraph 10: As noted in the earlier assessment of submission 5, it is recommended that the comment currently included in the Scheme Amendment Report regarding Peet & Co.’s staging strategy be deleted.
Paragraphs 13 & 14: Technical Services Directorate have reviewed the HGM calculations regarding the comparison of travel times and considers this to be a reasonable approach.
Regarding the comments made concerning impacts on the economy of the City of Wanneroo and revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre (through it being made easier for Banksia Grove residents to access the Joondalup City Centre), it is agreed that such impacts may occur. However, in cases such as this, a balance must be made between the interests of the local community concerned and the district as a whole and in this case, it is considered that it would be unreasonable and unfair for the Banksia Grove community to seek to deprive them of the perceived benefits of the road link.
It is noted that paragraph 14. does not address the issue of safety mentioned in paragraph 13.
Paragraph 15: Assessment of submission 6 addresses this issue.
Paragraphs 18: Regarding the comments made concerning the pavement condition of the eastern section of Clarkson Avenue, this section of this road is in the transition stage between a rural and an urban environment. It is acknowledged that the carriageway shoulders require regular maintenance however the City attends to this on an as-needs basis.
It should be noted that the City has on its Capital Works Budget for this financial year a “Black Spot” funded project to upgrade the intersection at Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue involving localised widening, line marking and median island treatment.
It should also be noted that the construction of the Joondalup Drive link will alleviate the need for Banksia Grove and Tapping residents to undertake a right turn movement at the western end of Clarkson Avenue at an uncontrolled intersection into Wanneroo Road for access to Joondalup Drive (west).
Paragraphs 19 & 20: The issues of high speed and conflicts with pedestrians and residential traffic will be addressed as part of the detailed road design and approval process.
Regarding the matter of a management plan being in place for the future intersection of Pinjar Road, Neaves Road and Joondalup Drive, this will similarly form part of the detailed design parameters and approval process.
Paragraphs 21 & 22: While the provision of the Joondalup Drive link concerned may well not assist in reducing remaining access problems on the northern part of Pinjar Road for traffic travelling to the raceway, it should still assist with management of traffic travelling from the raceway by providing an additional route from Pinjar Road to Wanneroo Road (and then to the freeway).
Paragraphs 23 & 24: While it is difficult to assess if the present number of emergency access routes is indeed sufficient or not, it is considered fair to say that the provision of additional routes is still a desirable objective.
Regarding the future provision of a properly constructed road link from Coogee Road to Franklin Road, such a link will occur in the future, possibly in conjunction with the development of the land adjacent to the presently unconstructed section. It is agreed that such a future link will also provide a useful emergency access function.
Paragraphs 25 & 26: Paragraph 25 has an error in reason No. 6, in that the wording in ‘brackets’ should read: “(Banksia Grove primary school children are currently served by a ‘school-in-houses’, in Banksia Grove; Carramar primary school children are currently served by the Wanneroo Junior Primary school and Wanneroo Primary School)”.
Paragraph 27: The reasons for seeking this amendment are still considered to be valid and are considered to justify this amendment.
Recommendation:
That this submission be dismissed.
Submission 10
Summary:
John Chapman Town Planning Consultant has made a submission on behalf of Peet & Co./ATF the Yatala Nominees Pty Ltd Unit Trust, a copy of which forms Appendix 6 to this Attachment.
Comment:
The points made in this submission are largely the same as those made in Submission 9 and the comments made upon Submission 9 are therefore generally also applicable to Submission 10. The following points made in Submission 10 are however considered to warrant particular comment:
· Section 3), paragraph 4: It is agreed that Joondalup Drive is currently being extended in accordance with the agreement, however this is not considered ‘timely’, as the road link to Banksia Grove is considered to be required as soon as possible for the reasons dealt with in the previous assessment of Submission 9.
· Section 3), paragraph 5: The current extension of Joondalup Drive to Walburg Drive is not considered to materially affect the basis upon which Amendment No. 9 is seen to be needed.
· Section 6): The statement made in the Scheme Amendment Report which is presumably the subject of the concern expressed in this comment is as follows: “These negotiations have now proved to be unsuccessful in respect to Peet & Co., and it is apparent that the City must pursue an alternative option if this road is to be constructed in the foreseeable future”.
To allay the submittor’s concern regarding Council not being accurately informed on this matter, Appendix 7 is a copy of correspondence received from Landstart in December 2001 which describes the pre-funding proposal of Peet & Co.’s considered by Landstart at that time, and Landstart’s position on it.
· Section 7): The section of Clause 10.3 of DPS2 referred to by the submittor states: “Within each Cell, Cell Works will be undertaken for the benefit of land contained within the Cell as generally set out in Schedule 9”.
Cell Works such as regional roads will in reality benefit not just the residents of the Cell which is meeting the cost of their provision, but also the regional community at large, as such roads are of course used to a significant degree also by that broader community.
In the case of the proposed Joondalup Drive link, it is acknowledged that the Banksia Grove community will benefit, however this will also extend to the Carramar community.
It is considered that Carramar residents will receive benefits as referred to in the assessment of Submission No. 5 (ie. Schools provision; public transport improvement; emergency access improvement – particularly if a major bushfire approached Carramar from Neerabup National Park to the west)
· Section 8): If a primary school is indeed built in Carramar in 2003 or 2004, such a school will be much more readily accessible to Banksia Grove through the Joondalup Drive link.
· Section 9): The Attachment 4 plans included in the Scheme Amendment Report showed the constructed extent of Joondalup Drive, and subdivision releases, at the time that Council initiated Amendment No. 9, in December 2001.
Recommendation:
That this submission be dismissed.
Submission 11
Summary:
This submission is lodged by the Yatala Unit Holders Advisory Committee and a copy of it is included as Appendix 8.
Comment:
The issues raised by the Committee have been addressed in the comments made on Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.
Recommendation:
That this submission be dismissed.
Submission 12-15
Summary:
These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:
“When we bought into the Carramar Estate, we enquired about the construction timetable of Joondalup Drive and were informed that it would be built in stages, as the estate grew. We understood that this timetable was legally binding on the developer, Peet and Company and the Council.
We were happy with this arrangement as we understood that it would be several years before the road was connected. We do not believe through traffic using Pinjar Road and Clarkson Avenue has increased significantly since we have lived here and consequently we do not see any changed circumstances which justify changing the original timetable”.
Comment:
These issues have been dealt with in the assessment of Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.
Recommendation:
That these submissions be dismissed.
Submissions 16-18
Summary:
These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:
“Peet and Company have gone to a lot of trouble and expense landscaping the sections of Joondalup Drive they have constructed. We understand that Council has no intention of doing similar landscaping along the proposed extension of Joondalup Drive. The road will become an eyesore and a source of dust and nuisance to residents, particularly in the early summer mornings when the easterly winds are strongest”.
Comment:
Although it is indeed unlikely that the City would undertake the level of landscaping that Peet & Co. has undertaken, the City would need to undertake a landscape treatment which prevented the area concerned from being an eyesore or a source of dust and nuisance to residents.
Recommendation:
That these submissions be dismissed.
Submissions 19 & 20
Summary:
These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:
“The progressive extension of Joondalup Drive as the adjoining subdivision occurs makes a lot of sense from a noise pollution aspect as the adjoining residential activity will hide traffic noise to some extent. If on the other hand the road is connected through the bush in advance of the adjoining housing there will be no other sound to obscure the highway sound. Traffic noise as it speeds through the area will be very loud and will cause disturbance and annoyance to Carramar residents.
Being an undeveloped area it will inadvertently generate speeding as the road will be of a high standard in a bush setting”.
Comment:
The absence of residential development adjacent to the eastern portion of the proposed road link should make little difference to the noise levels experienced by the residential areas themselves.
There may indeed be a temptation for traffic to speed due to the absence of residential development on adjacent land however extra policing measures can be undertaken to alleviate this.
Recommendation:
That these submissions be dismissed.
Submissions 21-24
These submissions have been lodged by Carramar residents and are identical. They object to Amendment No. 9 on the following grounds:
“The cost of constructing this road at this time is not justified by the low traffic volumes on the existing roads. Although it is noted that the cost will be passed on to the developers, it is still a waste of money to build an expensive road before it is justified or wanted by the residents.
The report talks about improving traffic congestion to and from the Barbagallo Raceway. Why should Carramar residents be burdened with this extra noise, particularly after race meetings as everyone tries to speed home?”
Comment:
The issues regarding cost and need for the road link have been addressed in the assessment of Submission Nos. 5, 9 and 10.
Regarding the issues raised associated with traffic leaving Barbagallo Raceway, as noted previously, this road link should assist in allowing such traffic to get to Wanneroo Road and to the freeway further to the west. This is a proper function of such a road, and as noted in respect to Submission Nos 19 and 20, temptations for drivers to speed on this road should be able to be addressed through an adequate level of policing.
Recommendation:
That these submissions be dismissed.
APPENDIX 1 PAGE 1 OF 2
APPENDIX 1 PAGE 2 OF 2
APPENDIX 2 PAGE 1 OF 2
APPENDIX 2 PAGE 2 OF 2
File Ref: |
|
Your Ref: |
|
Enquiries: |
PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO CITY OF WANNEROO DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO. 2 (DPS2)
I refer to your letter of 25 July 2002 and to the telephone discussion of 29 July 2002 between Brian McMurdo of your office and Rod Peake of this City wherein a 24 hour extension to the 5.00pm Monday 29 July 2002 deadline given in the last paragraph of that letter was sought. Mr McMurdo advised that he would seek his client’s instructions on this matter.
I wish to provide the following response to the various matters dealt with in your letter:
1. This City does not dispute that your client has complied with, and is continuing to comply with, the provisions of the deed concerned, regarding construction of Joondalup Drive. It is however apparent to this City that the subdivision of your client’s land is being undertaken in such a manner that the deed provisions requiring construction of Joondalup Drive are not being ‘triggered’ in a manner which would facilitate the timely construction of this road. A recent application for clearance of subdivision which specifically excluded those lots abutting Joondalup Drive, and therefore meaning that the performance of the relevant deed obligation was not required, is an example of this.
Previous discussions with the Peet & Co. Project Manager for this project, Mr Russell Burnett, have led City officers to understand that the staging of the subdivision to result in such a non-triggering of the relevant deed obligations has been designed to achieve such a result.
The statement made in the Scheme Amendment Report regarding subdivision staging strategy (paragraph 4 on page 2) has been based upon this City’s observation of the pattern and timing of subdivision that has occurred to-date, and the understanding reached from Mr Burnett’s comments, as indicated above.
APPENDIX 3 PAGE 2 OF 3
The statement concerned in the Scheme Amendment Report was intended to set out the facts of the matter concerned, as this City understood them. However, this City is most concerned that your client has taken such umbrage to this statement. As the subject of this statement is not central to the rationale for this proposed Scheme Amendment, this City would be willing to consider deleting this paragraph from the Scheme Amendment Report at the earliest opportunity.
2. The City is of the view that the deed concerned does not fetter the City in the undertaking of amendments to DPS2 which it considers are necessary for the proper and orderly planning and development of this district. Amendment No. 9 is primarily intended to facilitate the timely provision of the Joondalup Drive link to the Banksia Grove residential area and beyond to connect with Neaves Road. It is considered that the timely provision of this road would not occur should the timing for construction be dependent upon the operation of the present deed.
This City consequently does not consider the undertaking of Amendment No. 9 to be in breach of the deed, nor does it agree with your assertion that it is ultra vires through not being a proper or valid exercise of the City’s powers. It sees the Amendment as being a suitable instrument for facilitating the timely provision of this important road link and consequently does not accede to your request for immediate steps to be taken to withdraw the Amendment.
In respect to your comment that “…; the attempt to extract from my client a payment for the total costs of construction of the extension of Joondalup Drive and other scheme costs is wholly unsupportable in terms of the powers and objects of making or amendment a planning scheme under the TPDA.”, this presumably relates to your earlier assertion that the Amendment is ultra vires. I am somewhat puzzled as to why you would be of this view as there have of course been many planning schemes made under the TPDA since the coming into effect of that Act which have involved provision of funds by developers to enable provision of infrastructure, including major roads, required for the land development concerned. In the case of this City, Parts 10 and 11 of DPS2 do this.
Notwithstanding the above advice regarding non-withdrawal of this Amendment, I wish to advise that your letter shall be presented to Council as a submission on the proposed Amendment and Council shall therefore be able to consider your advice in determining its position on the proposed Amendment.
It should also be noted that procedurally, Amendment No. 9 is being prepared pursuant to the Town Planning Regulations, 1967 (as amended) and these do not enable the City to consider withdrawal of the Amendment at this point but rather require Council to consider submissions received following conclusion of the submission period.
APPENDIX 3 PAGE 3 OF 3
Amendment No. 9 has of course received the consent of the Western Australian Planning Commission to be advertised for submissions. You may also wish to take the issue of whether this amendment is ultra vires or not up with the Commission.
3. In the fifth paragraph of your letter, you have advised that “The implications of the Scheme amendment report are that the contribution sought to be imposed could amount to as much as $750,000, but may ultimately be much higher than that”. The report actually refers to an estimated cost of Cell Works (as at 1 May 2002) of approximately $4,180,000.
Please contact Roman Zagwocki of this City on 9405 5433 should you have any queries on this matter.
DIRECTOR, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
APPENDIX 4
APPENDIX 6 PAGE 1 OF 4
APPENDIX 6 PAGE 2 OF 4
APPENDIX 6 PAGE 3 OF 4
APPENDIX 6 PAGE 4 OF 4
APPENDIX 7
APPENDIX 8
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02278
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
File Name: AATender Number 02278 ii.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by JAN Date 05 November 2002
Level 2 Approval by JAN Date 05 November 2002
Level 1 Approval by JAN Date 05 November 2002
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender Number 02278 - The Construction of Two Groynes and Sand Renourishment for Coastal Protection Works at Quinns Beach, Quinns Rocks.
Background
Council considered a report at a meeting on 3 September 2002 (Item TS04-09/02 refers) on Quinns Beach Erosion and Coastal Protection and resolved as follows:-
“1. RECEIVES the Quinns Beach Erosion and Coastal Protection Study Report (August 2002) prepared by M P Rogers and Associates, which outlines the various options and recommendations for coastal management at Quinns Beach.
2. ADOPTS the construction of groynes and associated sand renourishment as the preferred coastal protection option for Quinns Beach.
3. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission of the public comments in relation to the Development Application that has been lodged for the proposed coastal protection works.
4. PREPARES a submission to the Hon Minister for Planning and Infrastructure outlining the preferred option and requesting a 50% funding commitment from State Government for the proposed coastal protection works staged over a four year period from November 2002 to November 2006.
5. AUTHORISES the preparation of tender documents and calling of tenders for the Stage 1 works, conditional on Council being presented with the outcome of funding negotiations with the State Government.”
The estimated capital cost of the groynes and associated sand renourishment option is summarised below:
Year 1 $932,000 Two southern groynes plus 60,000M3 sand renourishment
Year 2 $822,000 Northern groyne plus 60,000M3 sand renourishment
Year 3 $857,000 72,000M3 sand renourishment
Year 4 $100,000 contingency sum
Total $2,711,000 in 2002 terms
Following the acceptance of these recommendations by Council, M P Rogers and Associates (MPRA) was appointed to prepare a detailed design and specification for the recommended coastal management option and a comprehensive scope of works for inclusion in the tender documents.
Detail
Tender Number 02278 for the “Construction of Two Groynes and Sand Renourishment for Coastal Protection Works at Quinns Beach, Quinns Rocks,” was advertised on 12 October 2002 and at the close of tenders on 28 October 2002, three tender submissions had been received. Tenderers were invited to submit a lump sum price for the scope of works specified in the tender documents. A summary of the tender submissions is tabulated below:
Tenderer |
Lump Sum Price |
Remarks |
Roadstone – WA Limestone Joint Venture |
$1,195,686 to $1,252,046 |
Four tender bids submitted |
Yarnell Contracting |
$1,080,143 |
|
Force Equipment |
$1,065,919 |
Alternate tender bid submitted at Lump Sum Price of $969,919 |
The scope of works included the construction of two groynes and 72,000m3 of sand renourishment. A mandatory site inspection visit was organised on 22 October 2002 and it is confirmed that the three tenderers attended this site visit.
The scope of works also includes a contract suspension period to allow public access to the beach during the holiday period from 22 December 2002 to 3 February 2003. Subject to Council’s decision on the outcome of this tender, the contract works are programmed to commence on 18 November 2002, with the construction of Groyne 1, followed by sand renourishment south of this Groyne. It is expected that Groyne 2 will also be built prior to the commencement of the contract suspension period on 22 December 2002. Further sand renourishment works will be undertaken upon recommencement of contract works after 3 February 2003.
Tenders have been evaluated by MPRA in accordance with the following assessment criteria:
· Price offered for the Works;
· Tenderer’s Resources;
· Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out works similar to the scope of works associated with this project; and
· Safety Management.
An evaluation matrix has been prepared, which clearly rates Force Equipment above the other two tenders received. As part of the evaluation process, Force Equipment was interviewed on 31 October 2002 and their source of sand supply was inspected by MPRA and the City’s Coordinator Engineering Operations. Clarifications were also sought from Force Equipment to confirm the exact scope of works included in prices for some of the items. Force Equipment’s tender price is based on supply of sand from Rocla Quarry Products. Force Equipment submitted an alternate tender of $969,919 based on the supply of a major portion of sand from Carramar Resource Industries. MPRA confirmed that the sand from this source meets the specification requirements and is suitable for sand renourishment at Quinns Beach.
MPRA has provided an assessment report based on the tender submissions and written clarifications and has recommended Force Equipment’s tender bid which was presented as an alternate tender lump sum bid of $969,919.
The Working Party constituted to oversee the Quinns Beach Erosion and Coastal Protection issue met on 31 October 2002 to make an assessment of the tender submissions. The Working Party comprises the City’s Manager of Operational Services, the City’s Coordinator Engineering Operations, the Coastal Engineer from Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) and Mr Mick Rogers, the City’s Consultant. The Working Party reached a unanimous consensus and has recommended that the tender (alternate tender) be awarded to Force Equipment.
Based on MPRA and the Working Party recommendation, the alternate tender from Force Equipment provides the best value for money for the City.
Consultation
DPI was consulted throughout the design, documentation and tender phases of the project through representation of two officers on the Working Party.
Comment
MPRA has provided sufficient evidence that a thorough evaluation process has been undertaken to support their recommendation that the alternate tender submitted by Force Equipment provides the best value for money.
It is therefore recommended that Council accept the alternate tender from Force Equipment for undertaking the works in accordance with Tender No 02278 for a lump sum price of $969,919.
This recommendation will, however, be subject to approval to commence development. Preliminary discussions with the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) have indicated that the development approval, when granted, may be subject to some conditions including: -
· All stockpiles and the work area to be stabilised and suitable dust suppression methods to be used to prevent the movement of dust beyond the boundaries of the site.
· Prior to the commencement of any works relating to the third groyne, a Foreshore Management Plan is to be submitted and approved by the WAPC.
· Native plant species are to be used to re-vegetate the new dune and/or any other re-vegetation works proposed as part of this development.
The first point has been addressed in the scope of works and the specification for the contract works. A detailed Foreshore Management Plan incorporating re- vegetation works can be developed and submitted to WAPC prior to commencement of works associated with the third groyne in November 2003.
Preliminary discussions with WAPC have also indicated that WAPC has sought comments from Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) on this application to commence development. It is likely that any approval to commence development for this project by WAPC may include some conditions based on DEP’s comments.
WAPC has been contacted and it is likely that development approval may be granted in the very near future. The contract works can only proceed after this development approval is received.
The Manager Contracts and Property Services has reviewed the tender compliance and assessment process and endorses the recommendations.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995.
The City has followed the statutory requirement in regard to the approval to commence development and submitted a formal application in this regard to WAPC.
Strategic Implications
The recommendations within this report have been determined in the context that Quinns Beach is an important regional amenity and these works support the Strategic Plan Goal One “To value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of the City” and the associated objective “Develop and implement coastal and foreshore protection and improvement works”.
Policy Implications
The participants at the community information forum held on 15 August 2002 expressed concerns about the foreshore management regime after the groynes are established. It is therefore necessary for Council to consider a foreshore public use policy at the Quinns Beach location to meet the needs of swimmers, fishermen, surfers, sail boarders, powered craft owners and animal owners.
Financial Implications
By accepting the tender from Force Equipment, the total estimated cost of the Stage 1 works, including the outstanding consulting fees is summarised below:
ITEM DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
Construction of contract works – Tender Price |
$969,919 |
Fee payable to Mindarie Regional Council being the cost of limestone including weighbridge costs @$0.50 per tonne |
$5,000 |
On site management by City – One Employee for duration of contract Period |
$10,000 |
Consultancy Fee for contract works supervision |
$11,000 |
Operational Services and Infrastructure Services Unit Charges |
$16,500 |
Preparation of Foreshore Management Plan |
$25,000 |
Expenditure to date on consultancy fees expended for design, documentation and tender process |
$17,000 |
Contingency |
$50,000 |
Estimated Total Stage 1 Project Cost inclusive of contingency sum of $50,000 |
$1,104,419 |
Funds for this project have been allocated in the City’s 2002/2003 Capital Works Budget as detailed below:
Project No : 3201
Municipal Funds allocated : $500,000
An additional $100,000 funding provision is in the 2002/03 operating budget for sand renourishment works. This funding was allocated to fund the annual sand renourishment works if the ultimate coastal protection works were not to proceed. Since Stage 1 of the ultimate coastal protection works is now ready to be undertaken, this funding of $100,000 is available for funding these works and can be reallocated to project number 3201. A budget reallocation is necessary to transfer these funds ($100,000) from the Operating Budget (Engineering Maintenance Works – Activity 723) to Project Number 3201.
The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, the Hon Alannah MacTiernan announced at Quinns Beach on 5 November 2002, a State Government contribution of $1M towards the Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Works. An amount of $932,000, which equates to the estimated cost of Stage 1 works in the MPRA Final Report, will be made available in Year 1 with the remaining $68,000 paid in Year 2. The total estimated cost of this three year project is $2,711,000 in 2002 dollar terms and the State Government contribution equates to approximately one third of the total project cost.
Funds currently available, including the State Government contribution are as follows: -
Municipal funding in Project Number 3201 - $500,000
Budget reallocation from Operating Budget (Activity 723) - $100,000
State Government Funds $932,000
TOTAL CONFIRMED FUNDS - $1,532,000
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the $1 million contribution by the State Government towards the Coastal Protection Works Project at Quinns Beach.
2. ACCEPTS Tender Number 02278 submitted as an alternate conforming tender from Force Equipment for the Construction of Two Groynes and Sand Renourishment for Coastal Protection Works at Quinns Beach, Quinns Rocks, for the fixed lump sum price of $969,919, subject to granting of an approval to commence development by the Western Australian Planning Commission
3. AUTHORISES the signing of the contract agreement and commencement of the contract works upon fulfilment of the condition as defined in Recommendation 2.
4. NOTES the following budget variation to transfer funds from Engineering Maintenance Works (Activity 723) to Capital Works Budget (Project Number 3201): -
Expenditure
Cost Code |
From |
To |
Description |
51.60.72.723.4615.0001 |
$100,000 |
|
Engineering Maintenance Works |
Project Number 3201 |
|
$100,000 |
Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Works - |
5. AUTHORISES the preparation of a Foreshore Management Plan for the Quinns Foreshore (Ocean Drive to Tapping Way) incorporating a re-vegetation plan and access tracks to groynes utilising the funding from Project No 3201, Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Works.