AGENDA

Item 1 Attendances

Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence

Cr Tracey Roberts - 24 June 2003 to 15 July 2003.

That Cr John Stewart be granted Leave of Absence from 4 July 2003 to 21 July 2003.

Item 3 Public Question Time

Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes

OC01-07/03 Minutes Of Ordinary Council Meeting Held On 10 June 2003

That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 June 2003 be confirmed.

Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion

Item 6 Questions from Elected Members

Item 7 Petitions

New Petitions Presented

Update on Petitions

PT01-06/03 Mobile Telephone Tower, Hepburn Avenue, Landsdale

Cr Treby presented a petition signed by 130 electors of the City of Wanneroo to the 10 June 2003 Ordinary Council Meeting requesting requesting that Council support the community by advising Hutchison Telco that the proposed installation of a mobile telephone tower adjacent to Hepburn Avenue in Landsdale is an inappropriate location due to proximity of residential housing.

UPDATE

A report will be prepared and presented to Council at its meeting of 22 July 2003.

PT02-06/03 Installation of Bus Shelters, Greenpark Road, Alexander Heights

Cr Treby presented a petition signed by 60 electors of the City of Wanneroo to the 10 June 2003 Ordinary Council Meeting requesting that Council support the community by undertaking the timely installation of bus shelters on Greenpark Road, Alexander Heights to provide higher levels of amenity and shelter for public transport users.

UPDATE

A report will be prepared and presented to Council at its meeting of 12 August 2003.

PT03-06/03 Closure of Pedestrian Accessway between Sapling Way and Woodlands Grove, Hocking

Cr Monks presented a petition to the 10 June 2003 Ordinary Council Meeting with 60 signatures and 2 individual submissions strongly objecting to the permanent closure of the pedestrian accessway between Sapling Way and Woodlands Grove, Hocking.

UPDATE

This matter is currently in the process of public consultation.

Item 8 Reports

Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.

Cr Cvitan to declare a financial interest in Item PD04-07/03 as he lives within the proposed development.

Planning and Development

Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans

PD01-07/03 Amendment No 17 to District Planning Scheme No 2: Omnibus Amendment

File Ref: TPS/0017

File Name: BAAmendment No 17 to District Planning Scheme No 2 Omnibus Amendment.doc This line will not be printed

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 11 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 11 June 2003Please do NOT delete.

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Ian Bignell

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider modifications required by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to Amendment No 17 to District Planning Scheme No 2 (DPS2).

Background

At its meeting on 24 September 2002, Council resolved to prepare Amendment No 17 to DPS2 (item PD14-09/02 refers). The Amendment is an omnibus amendment involving 24 specific proposed changes to the Scheme maps and text, reflecting recommended refinements and corrections to the Scheme following the first year of its operation. The amendment documents were prepared and submitted to the WAPC for its consideration to advertise.

Amendment No 17 was also submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection in accordance with statutory requirements. The Department advised in its correspondence dated 23 December 2002 that the Environmental Protection Authority has determined that the amendment may proceed without a requirement for formal environmental assessment.

Detail

The WAPC has now advised that it consents to the advertising of Amendment No 17 for public submissions, subject to several modifications being made to its satisfaction to the amendment documents.

Two modifications involve the proposals previously endorsed by Council and the remainder are new proposals dealing with additional matters the Commission requires to be addressed as part of the Omnibus Amendment. Details and a comment on each of the required modifications follows:

1. Modifications to Existing Proposals

Modification 1.1 – Proposed Market Garden Sales Definition

Modify the proposed definition for “market garden sales” in Proposal No.7 by deleting the following text ‘…and where most of the fruit and vegetables so sold or offered for sale have been grown on that lot.’'

Comment:

Proposal 7 of the Amendment proposes several changes to the definitions under DPS2, including a proposal to introduce a new definition for “market garden sales”, which means:

“the sale or offering for sale of fresh fruit and vegetables from a lot which is predominantly used as a market garden and where most of the fruit and vegetables so sold or offered for sale have been grown on that lot.”

The WAPC letter provides no explanation or rationale for its decisions, however discussions with a DPI officer indicate that the Commission had concerns that the general nature of the phrase (in particular the word “most”) would cause difficulties in interpretation and enforcement for the City.

The change proposed by the WAPC would make the definition consistent with that which existed under the City’s former Town Planning Scheme No. 1 and there is therefore no objection to this change.

Recommendation:

To modify the proposed definition of “market garden sales” by deleting the words ‘…and where most of the fruit and vegetables so sold or offered for sale have been grown on that lot.’

Modification 1.2 – Removal of Special Use Zone 1.26

Modify the Amendment Report for Proposal 8 to include a description of the removal of Special Use Zone 1.26.

Comment:

Proposal 8 seeks to remove a number of Special zones from the DPS2, including Special Zone 1.26 which relates to a service station zone located on Lot 10 Marmion Avenue, Jindalee. The existing reference in the Amendment Report was to the rezoning of a neighbourhood centre site (comprising several zonings), which included site 1.26. This change is consistent with Council’s resolution to initiate this Amendment and is therefore supported.

Recommendation:

To modify the Amendment Report for Proposal 8, to include a description of the removal of Special Use Zone 1.26.

2. New Proposals required by the WAPC

The Commission required the following new proposals to be included in the amendment:

New Proposal 2.1 – Deleting Reference to Specific Zones

Clause 10.6.5 being modified by deleting the following `which are zoned for General and Light Industry and Mixed Business purposes'.

Comment:

Clause 10.6.5 of DPS2 relates to the East Wanneroo developer contributions and planning arrangements and currently reads as follows:

“10.6.5 Cells 7 & 8 Calculation of Infrastructure Cost Per Square Metre

The infrastructure contribution to be paid by owners of land in Cells 7 and 8 which are zoned for General and Light Industry and Mixed Business purposes shall be calculated on the basis of the number of square metres of each Cell which are capable of being developed (“the Infrastructure Cost Per Square Metre”).”

This modification is proposed because the clause refers to the Light Industry and Mixed Business zones, both of which do not exist under DPS2. The transition from the City’s former TPS1 to DPS2 failed to pick up this point, so a change to DPS2 is required to correct this minor error. The subclause relates to the zone types in East Wanneroo Cells 7 and 8 Structure Plans, however it is considered preferable to not refer to any zones as it is possible that other zones may be introduced in the future.

Recommendation:

Modify Clause 10.6.5 by deleting the following words `…which are zoned for General and Light Industry and Mixed Business purposes';

New Proposal 2.2 - Lot 253 Greenpark Road Alexander Heights

Rezone Lot 253 Greenpark Road/Park Lane, Alexander Heights from Residential to Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation;

Comment:

Lot 253 Greenpark Road/Park Lane Alexander Heights is presently zoned Residential, but effectively forms part of a parkland area including land to its north and south.

It was originally intended to be dedicated as public open space, however due to the manner in which the survey plans were prepared at the time of subdivision of this general area, the normal dedication mechanism was not triggered so it remained in the State Housing Commission’s ownership. Arrangements have now been made with the Commission for it to be dedicated for subsequent vesting in the City. In anticipation of this, and recognising the current use of the land, it is considered appropriate for it to be included in the local Parks and Recreation Reserve under DPS2.

Recommendation:

To rezone Lot 253 Greenpark Road/Park Lane, Alexander Heights from Residential to Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation.

New Proposal 2.3 – Historic Open Space Provisions

Modify Clause 10.5.6 by replacing the words `shall only' with `may' and include the following text at the end of the first sentence `, or at a time as the Council determines having regard to the principles outlined in Clause 10.3 and within a 5 year period from the date of the contribution from the owner under Clause 10.10.6.'.

Comment:

Clause 10.5.6 of DPS2 relates to time of payment for historic open space under the East Wanneroo developer contributions and planning arrangements of the scheme and currently reads as follows:

10.5.6 The credit payable to an owner or owners shall only be paid at the time such owner(s) subdivide or develop the landholding generally in accordance with the Agreed Structure Plan for the Cell. Such payment may, at the discretion of the City, be credited against the cell Infrastructure Costs payable by the owner for the subdivision or development.

Subclause 10.5.6 currently provides that the City shall only pay a credit which may be due to landowners in respect of historic open space at the time the landowner subdivides or develops that owner’s land. The changes would enable the City to credit landowners for historic open space either before or up to 5 years after development to enable the City to manage the implementation of the Cell Works in the most economical manner as envisaged by clauses 10.3 and 10.9.3, and this in turn will be able to benefit all landowners involved. The modification is therefore supported.

Recommendation:

To modify Clause 10.5.6 by replacing the words `shall only' with `may' and include the following text at the end of the first sentence `…, or at a time as the Council determines having regard to the principles outlined in Clause 10.3 and within a 5 year period from the date of the contribution from the owner under Clause 10.10.6.'.

New Proposal 2.4 – Historic Open Space Provisions

Modify Clause 10.5.3 to clarify the manner in which the sum that an owner is to be paid in respect to a historic public open space contribution is to be calculated.

Comment:

Clause 10.5.3 currently reads as follows:

“10.5.3 If a land holding in a Cell previously contributed land for one of the Reserves referred to in subclause 10.5.2 (b) as part of an historic subdivision, the present owner or owners of such land holding shall be paid a sum for the value of the Reserve. The sum due to an owner is the proportion of the total value of the Reserve that the owner’s landholding bears to the total land area in the historic subdivision and shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

S = G ¸ H X 100

Where:

S = the value of the proportion of the historic contribution that an owner’s land in a Cell made to a Reserve for which the owner or owners are entitled to be paid the market value (“the Credit”).

H = the total land area of the historic subdivision which contributed to the Reserve.

G = the area of the owner’s land in a Cell.

The area of a Reserve that is to be valued is, for the purpose of calculating public open space in this clause, to be limited to 10% of the area of the historic subdivision that created it whether or not the actual area of the Reserve exceeds that proportion.”

The formula intended for the calculation of the sum (in dollars) that an owner is to be paid in respect to a historic open space contribution currently only provides a proportion figure (as a percentage) rather than a dollar amount. A minor change is therefore required to the formula. A further change is also recommended to the description of item ‘G’ in the formula to make it clear that it refers to the area of the owner’s land within the historic subdivision area. Several other minor rewordings are proposed to improve the clarity of the subclause. These modifications will clarify the intent of the clause and are therefore supported.

Recommendation:

Modify Clause 10.5.3 to clarify the manner in which the sum that an owner is to be paid in respect to a historic public open space contribution is to be calculated.

New Proposal 2.5 – Bush Forever

Replace any reference to `BushPlan' with `Bush Forever' in the Scheme, including Clause 3.17.2(G);

Comment:

The Scheme currently contains several references to BushPlan, and it is considered appropriate to change this reference to Bush Forever as this is the correct title of the State Government’s policy.

Recommendation:

Replace all references to `BushPlan' with `Bush Forever' in the Scheme, including Clause 3.17.2(G).

New Proposal 2.6 – Special Rural Zone No 18

Include the Crown Reserves for Recreation in Special Rural Zone No.18 in the ‘Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation’.

Comment:

Special Rural Zone No 18 (Emerald Valley Estate, Carabooda) includes two Crown Reserves 46726 and 46727, which have been vested in the City for Parks and Recreation purposes. As this modification more accurately reflects the use of the land it is supported.

Recommendation:

Include the Crown Reserves for Recreation in Special Rural Zone No.18 in the ‘Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation’.

New Proposal 2.7 - St Stephens School

Rezone the St Stephens School on Lot 1260 St Stephens Crescent, Tapping from Urban Development to Private Clubs/Recreation zone.

Comment:

This modification is consistent with the use of the land and the zoning of other private school sites under DPS2 and is therefore supported.

Recommendation:

Rezone Lot 1260 St Stephens Crescent, Tapping from Urban Development to Private Clubs/Recreation zone.

New Proposal 2.8 - Butler and Banksia Grove Government Primary Schools

Rezone the Government primary schools that are either constructed or under construction in Butler and Banksia Grove from Urban Development to Local Scheme Reserve (Primary School).

Comment:

These schools are located on Lot 9010 Joondalup Drive, Carramar and Portion of Lot 9022 Camborne Parkway, Butler. This modification is consistent with the use of the land and the zoning of other government school sites under DPS2 and is therefore supported.

Recommendation:

Rezone Lot 9010 Joondalup Drive, Carramar and Portion of Lot 9022 Camborne Parkway, Butler from Urban Development to Local Scheme Reserve (Primary School).

New Proposal 2.9 - Public Open Space Hocking and Darch

Include the Public Open Space areas, Manchester Drive, Hocking and Monaghan Circle, Darch, in the Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation.

Comment:

The public open space areas referred to above are crown land (not yet vested) and have been created as recreation reserves. It is considered appropriate to designate these as Local Scheme Reserves. In addition, Crown Reserve 45863 Heacham Drive, Hocking (vested in the City) and Lot 601 Monaghan Circle, Darch which adjoin these areas of open space and are dedicated and developed for drainage purposes. It is considered appropriate to also designate these sites as Local Scheme Reserve – Public Use.

Recommendation:

Include Lots 262 and 414 Manchester Drive, Hocking and Lot 600 Monaghan Circle, Darch in the Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation and Reserve 45863 Heacham Drive, Hocking and Lot 601 Monaghan Circle, Darch in the Local Scheme Reserve – Public Use.

New Proposal 2.10 - Reserve 38656 Coogee Road, Mariginiup

Rationalise the Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation for Crown Reserve 38656 Coogee Road, Mariginiup, so that it is consistent with the Crown Reserve boundaries;

Comment:

The realignment of Coogee Road in the late 1990s resulted in the road reserve encroaching and reducing the area of Crown Reserve 38656 (vested in the City for Parks and Recreation). At the same time, portions of the former road reserve were closed and transferred into adjoining lots to the north in Special Rural Zone No 13. DPS2 does not reflect the current reserve and lot boundaries, and therefore the boundaries of Reserve 38656 and Special Rural Zone No 13 should be rationalised accordingly.

Recommendation:

Rationalise the Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation for Crown Reserve 38656 Coogee Road, Mariginiup, so that it is consistent with the Crown Reserve boundaries.

3. New Proposals Identified by Administration

In addition to the various modifications to Amendment No 17 required by the Commission, it is considered necessary to make several further modifications to the Amendment by including several other matters which have recently been identified by the Administration as requiring attention. These further items are as follows:

New Proposal 3.1 – Commercial Vehicle Parking Requirements

Both this Amendment (in Proposal 5) and Amendment No 22 involve amendments to the commercial vehicle parking provisions in Clause 4.23 of DPS2, and in particular both involve changes to subclause 4.23.6. Amendment 22 was adopted for final approval by Council at its meeting of 20 May 2003 and is now with the Commission for consideration of final approval. Assuming that Amendment 22 is approved and gazetted prior to Amendment 17, minor rewording of Proposal 5 will be necessary to ensure the cumulative effect of the two Amendments is achieved. The relevant section of Proposal 5 currently reads as follows:

“In subclause 4.23.6, replace the words “subclause 4.23.3 (b) and (d)” with “subclause 4.23.3 (b), (d), (e) and (k), and replace the words “in writing” with “upon application for planning approval”.”

The replacement section should read as follows:

“In subclause 4.23.6, replace the words “subclause 4.23.3 (b), (d) and (l)” with “subclause 4.23.3 (b), (d), (e), (k) and (l), and replace the words “in writing” with “upon application for planning approval”.”

Recommendation:

That Proposal 5 of this Amendment be modified to ensure the cumulative effect of this amendment and Amendment 22 is achieved.

New Proposal 3.2 - Wanneroo Variety Markets

In 2001, the Wanneroo Variety Markets, located on portion of Lot 888 (former Lot 8) Prindiville Drive, Wangara, were given approval to expand into former Lot 8. These markets are currently under construction. At the time of lodging the application the land was zoned Special Zone – Additional Use (Markets), however upon gazettal of DPS2 the zoning was changed to Business. Under DPS2 the use class ‘markets’ is not permitted in the Business zone. In order to accommodate the approved market use it is recommended that the eastern portion of Lot 888 (former Lot 8) be rezoned from Business to Business, Additional Use – Markets.

Recommendation:

Rezone the eastern portion of Lot 888 (former Lot 8) Prindiville Drive, Wangara from Business to Business, Additional Use – Markets.

New Proposal 3.3 – Rural Setbacks

Subclauses 3.16.3(a) and 3.17.3(a) are included under the preamble statement “Where residential development is carried out in the General Rural [or Rural Resource] Zone, the following provisions shall apply:” and are worded as follows:

“No person shall construct any building or undertake any development or other works, other than a firebreak or an equivalent alternative approved by Council or an accessway, closer than 7.5 metres to a street alignment or 4 metres to any other boundary.”

These subclauses were intended to apply to all development in the relevant rural zones, not just to residential development as noted in the preamble statement. The situation can be corrected by replacing the two subclauses as standalone clauses.

Recommendation:

Renumber paragraph (a) of subclause 3.16.3 and 3.17.3 as subclauses 3.16.3 and 3.17.3, and the remainder of these subclauses be renumbered as subclauses 3.16.4 and 3.17.4 with alphabetic sub-subclauses renumbered accordingly.

New Proposal 3.4 – References to Town Planning Scheme No 1 Amendments

Both Part 10 and Schedule 9 of DPS2 make references to “Amendments 773 and 816” which had been in process to introduce the urban zonings and East Wanneroo provisions into the City’s former TPS1. Both of these amendments were incorporated into draft DPS2 just prior to its finalisation and inadvertently included reference to the TPS1 amendment numbers. These references have no relevance to DPS2 and should be deleted.

Recommendation:

That reference to Amendments 773 and 816 be deleted from Part 10 and Schedule 9 of DPS2.

New Proposal 3.4 – Schedule 15 – Rural Community Provisions

Schedule 15 contains the Special Provisions relevant to Rural Community zones, with only Zone 1 (Lots 201 and 202 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks) currently in place. Special Provision 1.1.2(l) reads as follows:

“The exclusive use of aerobic treatment units, modified septics or small package treatment plants shall be required within the zone to minimise potential water pollution via subsurface drainage.”

The provision emanated from the original rezoning amendment for the site, which was subject of a requirement for formal environmental review by the Environmental Protection Authority. The Minister for the Environment’s Statement (No 537) required that nutrient attenuating sewage disposal mechanisms be provided to service the development to prevent groundwater pollution and loss of stygofauna. The current provision does not clearly require this and a rewording is therefore required to more accurately reflect the intention. It is therefore appropriate to reword this Special Provision to read:

Recommendation:

To modify Special Provision 1.1.2(l) of Schedule 15 to reads as follows:

“Nutrient attenuating onsite effluent disposal systems shall be required within this zone to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.”

Consultation

The amendment will be advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days in accordance with the requirements of the WAPC. The consultation process will involve advertising the Amendment in the local newspaper for two consecutive weeks, placing signs on site in respect of several proposals, and notifying affected and nearby landowners and relevant State Government agencies.

Comment

The modifications and additional proposals as set out above are considered appropriate and are recommended for adoption by Council to enable Amendment No 17 to be progressed.

Statutory Compliance

Pursuant to Regulations 14 (4) and 25AA (6) of the Town Planning Regulations 1967 (as amended), Council is required to return the modified amendment documents to the WAPC within 42 days, or longer period approved by the Minister for Planning. The City was notified on 29 April 2003, and has written to the WAPC seeking an extension of time to consider the modifications.

Strategic Implications

This amendment is consistent with the Healthy Communities Goal of the City’s Strategic Plan 2002-05.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. RESOLVES to proceed with Amendment No 17 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2;

2. MODIFIES Amendment No. 17 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 as follows:

a) Proposals 1 to 24:

i) in Proposal No.7, modify the new proposed definition for market garden sales by deleting the following text `and where most of the fruit and vegetables so sold or offered for sale have been grown on that lot.'

ii) modify the Amendment Report for Proposal 8 to include a description of the removal of Special Use Zone 1.26.

iii) in Proposal 5(a), delete the second dot point and insert the following:

b) Additional Proposals:

i) modify Subclause 10.6.5 by deleting the following `which are zoned for General and Light Industry and Mixed Business purposes';

ii) Rezone Lot 253 Greenpark Road/Park Lane, Alexander Heights from Residential to Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation;

iii) modify Subclause 10.5.6 by replacing the words `shall only' with `may' and including the following text at the end of the first sentence `, or at a time as the Council determines having regard to the principles outlined in Clause 10.3 and within a 5 year period from the date of the contribution from the owner under Clause 10.10.6.';

iv) modify Subclause 10.5.3 as follows:

a) delete the existing formula ‘S = G ÷ H x 100’ and insert ‘S = (G ÷H) x V’;

b) insert ‘V = value of the reserve, subject to subclause 10.5.3(b)’ after the description of value G;

c) delete the words ‘…that the’ and insert the phrase ‘…, subject to subclause 10.5.3(b), that the area of the…’ after ‘…the Reserve’ in line 5;

d) insert the phrase ‘…, subject to subclause 10.5.3(b),…’ after ‘…the Reserve’ in the description of value S;

e) delete the description of value G and insert ‘G = the area of the owner’s land within the historic subdivision area.’;

f) denote the last sentence of the subclause, commencing ‘The area of a reserve…’ as subclause (b), and the preceding section of the subclause as subclause (a).

v) replace any reference to `BushPlan' with `Bush Forever' in the Scheme, including Subclause 3.17.2(g);

vi) rezone Crown Reserves 46726 and 46727 in Special Rural Zone No.18 (Carabooda) from Special Rural to Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation;

vii) rezone St Stephens School, Lot 1260 St Stephens Crescent, Tapping from Urban Development to Private Clubs and Recreation;

viii) rezone the proposed government primary schools located on Lot 9010 Joondalup Drive Carramar and Portion of Lot 9022 Camborne Parkway Butler from Urban Development to Local Scheme Reserve – Public Use (Primary School);

ix) rezone Lots 262 and 414 Manchester Drive, Hocking and Lot 600 Monaghan Circle, Darch from Urban Development to Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation;

x) rezone Crown Reserve 45863 Heacham Drive, Hocking and Lot 601 Monaghan Circle, Darch from Urban Development to Local Scheme Reserve – Public Use;

xi) rationalise the boundaries of Crown Reserve 38656 Coogee Road, Mariginiup (Local Scheme Reserve - Parks and Recreation) and Special Rural Zone No 13;

xii) include the eastern portion of Lot 888 Prindiville Drive, Wangara in site reference number 1.17 - Additional Use (Markets) of Section 1, Schedule 2, and amend the Scheme Map accordingly;

xiii) renumber paragraph (a) of subclauses 3.16.3 and 3.17.3 as subclauses 3.16.3 and 3.17.3, and renumber subclause 3.16.3 and 3.17.3 as 3.16.4 and 3.17.4 respectively with alphabetic paragraphs renumbered accordingly;

xiv) modify Part 10 and Schedule 9 as follows:

a) Modify subclause 10.10.4 by:

i) deleting the words commencing in line two “final approval by the Minister for Planning and publication of Amendment No. 816 in the Government Gazette and”;

ii) deleting the words “Amendment 816 and” from the seventh line;

iii) replacing the word “come” in the eighth line with the word “came”;

iv) deleting the words “Amendment No. 816 and” from the twelfth line;

v) replacing the words “have come” in the thirteenth line with the word “came”;

b) Modify subclause 10.10.5 by deleting the words “Amendment No. 816”;

c) Modify Clause 10.11 by deleting the phrase “Upon final approval by the Minister for Planning and publication of Amendment No. 816 in the Government Gazette and …”;

d) Modify Schedule 9, section 2.0 point 8. by replacing the words “Scheme Amendment Nos 773 and 816 introducing these provisions” with “East Wanneroo planning and developer contribution arrangement provisions either under this scheme or former Town Planning Scheme No. 1”.

xv) modify Schedule 15, Rural Community Zone 1, by deleting the current Special Provision 1.1.2(l) and adding “Nutrient attenuating onsite effluent disposal systems shall be required within this zone to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.”.

3. ADOPTS the modified form of Amendment No. 17 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2;

4. RESUBMITS the duly modified amendment documents to the Western Australian Planning Commission;

5. Upon being advised by the Western Australian Planning Commission that the required modifications to the amendment documents have been satisfactorily carried out, ADVERTISES the amendment in accordance with the Commission’s requirements.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

PD02-07/03 Proposed Amendment No. 13 to District Planning Scheme No. 2: Lot 61 Dempster Place, Mariginiup

File Ref: TPS/0013

File Name: BAAmendment 13 to DPS2 - Lot 61 Dempster Placexxxxxxxx.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 11 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 11 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Phil Thompson

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: 3

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider an application which seeks to amend the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) to modify the Development Guide Plan for Special Rural Zone No. 4 (Lake Adams) to enable creation of 22 additional Special Rural lots and an additional public open space area within this Special Rural Zone.

Applicant	Development Planning Strategies
Owner	John Emanuel Squarcini, Shafto Pty Ltd, Milino Pty Ltd (tenants in common in equal shares)
Location	Lot 61 Dempster Place, Mariginiup
Site Area	59.1874 ha
DPS 2 Zoning	Special Rural
MRS Zoning	Rural

Background

Special Rural Zone No. 4 is situated on the south-east corner of Pinjar Road and Neaves Road, Mariginiup. It was rezoned and subdivided for Special Rural purposes in the late 70’s.

The Development Guide Plan currently applying to this zone is shown on Attachment 1. It may be noted that the Lake Adams wetland area which generally comprises the central portion of the zone is divided into two types of use: a western public open space area which includes an excavated open water area, and an eastern area shown for various types of equestrian based facilities.

While the western public open space area has been developed as shown, the eastern area did not develop as an equestrian facility with the parties originally behind that proposal deciding many years ago not to proceed with it.

The eastern area (being Lot 61 Dempster Place) was subsequently sold to the present owners who have continued to run stock on the land.

This report was previously considered at the Council meeting of 20 May 2003 (item PD04-05/03) and was referred back to Council Administration for further investigation of groundwater issues. Concerns relating to groundwater matters are addressed in the report which is again presented to Council for consideration.

Detail

The applicant seeks to amend DPS 2 to:

1. Replace the current Development Guide Plan with a new Development Guide Plan as shown on Attachment 2. This shows 22 additional Special Rural lots on the eastern portion of Lot 61, with the western portion of Lot 61 to be ceded as public open space.

2. Replace the Special Provisions currently applying to this zone under DPS 2 with the Special Provisions listed in Attachment 3. It may be noted that this involves the zone being divided into two ‘precincts’ with Precinct A comprising the portion of the zone which excludes Lot 61, and Precinct B comprising Lot 61. Each precinct would have its own set of Special Provisions. The Special Provisions to apply to Precinct A are basically the same as those currently applying to this zone, except that current Special Provision 2 has been excluded. (“2. The land the subject of this zone may be used for equestrian, residential and/or horticultural purposes only.”) This is apparently an oversight on the part of the applicant and the provision should be reinstated if the amendment proceeds.

A copy of the submission made by the applicant has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room. It should be noted however that this initial submission has been modified slightly by the applicant following consultation with government agencies. In particular, the proposed Development Guide Plan has been modified to delete several excavated open water areas which were originally proposed.

Consultation

Recommendation 1 e) includes a request to undertake preliminary consultation with local interest groups. Should Council resolve to prepare Amendment No. 13 to DPS 2 and the Western Australian Planning Commission grants its consent for the amendment to be advertised, then further consultation will be required to be undertaken. This would normally include on-site signs, a newspaper advertisement and letters to adjacent landowners to ensure widespread public notice of the proposal.

Comment

Comments on Proposal by Government Agencies

Department of Environmental Protection/Water and Rivers Commission (DEP/WRC)

The Department’s advice is essentially as follows:

1. Lake Adams is a conservation category wetland (CCW). CCW’s are wetlands with high ecological values and are the highest priority wetlands for conservation.

2. Notwithstanding 1. above, the Department notes that the eastern portion of the wetland (comprising Lot 61) has been degraded by current and past land use activities.

3. The Development Guide Plan first submitted by the applicant was considered unacceptable due to its proposal to have excavated water bodies in the proposed public open space. The current plan which deletes this feature is a more agreeable option but is only agreed to in principle at this stage as a detailed plan is yet to be submitted for formal comment by the Department.

4. Prior to support for a zoning change being given, a detailed Wetland Rehabilitation/Revegetation Plan needs to be produced to the satisfaction of the Department. This Plan should include, but not be limited to, the following:

· Identification of the wetland’s conservation values and functions.

· Identification of the potential impacts that the proposed change in land use will have on the wetland’s conservation values and functions and the necessary measures required to adequately manage these impacts need to be determined and addressed.

· It also needs to be strongly demonstrated that there will be a net environmental gain/off-set.

5. In addition to 4 above, detailed development plans for all areas to be developed need to be submitted for formal comment to the Department in relation to all issues and not limited to wetland issues.

6. A study of the groundwater and surface water hydrology needs to be undertaken, identifying whether the proposal will maintain the quantity and quality of groundwater and surface water so that the wetland ecosystem and the Priority 3 Underground Water Pollution Control Area are protected.

7. The developer also needs to consider the impact of an altered water regime, whether it be induced by climatic change or change in local groundwater levels, and the potential of this change to impact on building structures currently proposed for within a wetland (type: dampland).

The studies required to be undertaken pursuant to points 4. and 6. above would also address related issues identified by Administration, including:

a) Preparation of a Drainage Nutrient Management and Monitoring Plan and related maintenance agreement with the City;

b) Provision of uniform fencing to lots abutting the proposed public open space;

c) Undertaking of groundwater monitoring recommended by JDA Consultant Hydrologists (whose report forms part of the applicant’s submission) to confirm water table information;

d) The need to demonstrate that nutrient attenuating effluent disposal systems (ATU’s), with or without soil amendment, would indeed be acceptable for this site;

e) The need to similarly demonstrate acceptability of a proposed nutrient stripping basin for stormwater disposal;

f) Design of the system for conveyance of stormwater to the disposal basin.

The applicant has agreed to undertake these further studies, however believes that they can adequately be completed after initiation of the amendment. This approach is not supported as these studies are required to confirm the acceptability of the proposal. They should also be available at the time that the amendment is advertised for public submissions, so that the community can be made properly aware of the nature of the issues concerned and how they are proposed to be addressed.

Department of Agriculture

The Department advises that:

1. In some circumstances, a Notice of Intent to clear vegetation is required to be made to the Commissioner for Soil Conservation. (This would however not be relevant in this case due to the current condition of the site and the fact that the main existing vegetated areas are to be protected in the proposed public open space).

2. Stocking rates should be guided by the Department’s Stocking Rate Guidelines for Rural and Small Holdings.

Special Provisions

The proposed Special Provisions are considered generally satisfactory, subject to the following modifications being made:

1. Existing Special Provision 2 being retained to apply to proposed Precinct A (as referred to previously in this report).

2. Proposed Special Provision 1 of Precinct B being modified to require a minimum lot size of 1.0 hectare.

3. Special Provision 7 should be modified to require the preparation of the Fire Management Plan prior to the City supporting subdivision of the proposed Special Rural lots. This will ensure that any relevant recommendations of the Management Plan can be incorporated in subdivision design.

4. Special Provision 8 should be modified to reflect the requirement that wetland management plans are to be prepared prior to initiation of the DPS 2 amendment.

5. Proposed Special Provision 10 for Precinct B requiring use of only nutrient attenuating effluent disposal systems.

6. A Special Provision being included requiring provision of reticulated water supply to lots in Precinct B.

7. While the rezoning submission advises that a Special Provision will require new lot occupiers to revegetate the properties, proposed Special Provision 9 does not properly address this.

Revegetation will be important in respect to nutrient management and it is therefore considered that a revegetation plan for the proposed Special Rural lots should be prepared in conjunction with the wetland rehabilitation/revegetation plan required to be prepared by DEP/WRC (which is presumably intended to focus on the proposed public open space area). A Special Provision to support implementation of the revegetation plan would be appropriate.

8. Special Provisions referring to keeping of stock should include reference to compliance with the stocking rate guidelines of the Department of Agriculture (as referred to earlier).

9. A Special Provision may be appropriate for advising prospective purchasers of land that some areas may be subject to periodic inundation. The possible need for this, and if so, the appropriate wording, should be determined through the hydrology study required by DEP/WRC.

Other Comments

1. The proposed Development Guide Plan includes a note that the proposed public open space area is to be included in the adjoining Reserve 36496, which is a narrow reserve, vested in the City which contains bridle trails. However, subsequent correspondence from the applicant advises that the open space reserve should be amalgamated with the existing Reserve 42745 which contains the existing rehabilitated wetland area and is currently also vested in the City. This would be a preferable arrangement and should be shown as such by the Development Guide Plan.

2. In assessing the values of the wetland area, it would be appropriate for the applicant to consult with the Department of Indigenous Affairs regarding Aboriginal heritage issues.

Conclusion

The site is currently being used for stock keeping which is likely to be having undesirable impacts on the adjacent rehabilitated wetland area (which is an Environmental Protection Policy (EPP) wetland). If a more environmentally acceptable alternative use for the site is not permitted, then the current undesirable use is likely to continue and this would be to the further detriment of the adjacent EPP wetland.

The current proposal may enable a net environmental gain to be achieved (as referred to by DEP/WRC), however the studies referred to by DEP/WRC need to be undertaken first to confirm this, rather than subsequent to initiation of rezoning as proposed by the applicant.

Statutory Compliance

This application is being considered in accordance with the Town Planning Regulations 1967 (as amended).

Strategic Implications

Subject to confirmation of the environmental benefits of this proposal, it will be consistent with the environmental sustainability goal of the City’s Strategic Plan.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Future vesting of the proposed public open space area in the City will have financial implications for the City in respect to management of the area. The likely costs involved cannot be determined until the studies referred to in this report have been undertaken.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ADVISES Development Planning Strategies that it will prepare Amendment No. 13 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to modify the Development Guide Plan and Special Provisions in respect to Special Rural Zone No. 4, subject to the following matters being undertaken to the satisfaction of the Department of Environmental Protection/Water and Rivers Commission (DEP/WRC) and the City Administration:

a) The preparation of a detailed Wetland Rehabilitation/Revegetation Plan as described by DEP/WRC;

b) The undertaking of a study of groundwater and surface water hydrology, including consideration of the impact of an altered water regime;

c) The submission of detailed development plans for all areas to be developed, for assessment in relation to all relevant issues and not limited to wetland issues;

d) Consultation being undertaken with the Department for Indigenous Affairs regarding Aboriginal heritage issues;

e) Following satisfactory completion of points a. to d. above, consultation being undertaken with local interest groups.

2. Subject to the above, pursuant to Section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act (as amended) PREPARES Amendment No. 13 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:

a) Replace the current Development Guide Plan for Special Rural Zone No. 4 with the proposed new Development Guide Plan shown in Attachment 2, subject to:

i) The proposed public open space area to be shown to be amalgamated with Reserve 42745;

ii) Such minor consequential changes as may arise from the detailed studies referred to in 1 above;

b) Replace the current Special Provisions applying to Special Rural Zone No. 4 with the proposed new Special Provisions listed in Attachment 3 of this report, subject to the following changes being made to those provisions:

i) Existing Special Provision 2 being applied to Precinct A;

ii) Proposed Special Provision 1 of Precinct B being modified to require a minimum lot size of 1.0 hectare.

iii) Proposed Special Provision 7 being modified to require the preparation of the Fire Management Plan prior to the City supporting subdivision of the proposed Special Rural lots.

iv) Proposed Special Provision 8 being deleted as the requirement that wetland management plans are prepared is required prior to initiation of Amendment No. 13.

v) Proposed Special Provision 10 requiring use of only nutrient attenuating effluent disposal systems;

vi) A Special Provision being included requiring provision of reticulated water supply to Precinct B;

vii) A Special Provision being included to require implementation of a revegetation plan for the proposed lots in Precinct B;

viii) A Special Provision being included which requires that stocking rate guidelines of the Department of Agriculture be complied with in precinct B;

ix) Such other changes as may be required to reflect the outcomes of the studies to be undertaken pursuant to 1 above.

3. SUBMITS Amendment No. 13 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for consent to advertise for public submissions; and

4. REFERS Amendment No. 13 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD03-07/03 Proposed Amendment No. 25 to District Planning Scheme No. 2: Precinct 64, East Landsdale

File Ref: TPS /0025

File Name: BAProposed Amendment No 25 to District Planning Scheme No 2 Precinct 64 East Landsdale.doc This line will not be

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 12 June 2003printed Please do NOT delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Phil Thompson/Chris Brady

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider an application which seeks to amend District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) to rezone ‘Precinct 64’, East Landsdale from mainly General Rural to Urban Development and also seeks that the City requests the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to initiate an amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) to rezone the area concerned from Rural to Urban under that Scheme.

Applicant	Development Planning Strategies
Location	Land Bounded by Gnangara Road, Alexander Drive, Hepburn Avenue reserve, east boundary of Landsdale Urban Zoned Land
Site Area	225 ha (approx)
DPS 2 Zoning	General Rural, General Rural (Additional Use – Plant Nursery), Local Reserve for Parks and Recreation, Private Clubs/Recreation
MRS Zoning	Rural

Background

The location of the subject land is shown on Attachment 1. It comprises 64 lots, most of which range in area from 2 to 4 ha.

The North West Corridor Structure Plan (1992) designates the subject land as ‘Landscape Protection Zone’. The statutory planning schemes reflect this designation: the MRS zones the land as Rural, and DPS2 mainly zones it as General Rural.

The subject land has a Priority 2 groundwater protection designation as it falls within the catchment area of the Mirrabooka public water supply scheme.

The subject land also lies just to the west of the Telstra Perth International Telecommunications Centre (PITC) situated on the south east corner of Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive. Telstra has in the past opposed urbanisation of the subject land as it has considered that this would interfere with the operation of the PITC.

Since the early 1990’s, a number of landowners in the subject area have persisted with the view that the presence of the PITC was preventing them from being able to rezone and develop for urban purposes and they therefore sought some form of arrangement with Telstra whereby they would be able to receive a return from their land comparable to that which they might have received if they had been able to develop for urban purposes.

Telstra and Commonwealth Government officials involved at the time argued that it was not Telstra which was making the decisions concerning the future planning of the area but rather the relevant State planning agency involved.

With a view to obtaining a formal decision of the planning agencies involved on the matter, in May 1997, the landowners in the area formally applied to the City, seeking amendments to the Metropolitan and local planning schemes to facilitate urban development of the area.

In September 1997, Council resolved to initiate the requested scheme amendments.

The local scheme amendment (Amendment No. 801 to the City’s former Town Planning Scheme No. 1) was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in accordance with the Town Planning Regulations. In January 1998, the EPA advised that it considered that the proposed amendment was, by its nature, incapable of being made environmentally acceptable.

The main environmental factors the EPA considered were:

· “Groundwater quality as the site is within a Priority 2 Underground Water Pollution Control Area on the Gnangara Mound, and

· Soil and Groundwater contamination from Agricultural/horticultural land uses.”

In May 1998, the WAPC advised that it was not prepared to initiate an MRS amendment to rezone the subject land for Urban purposes, for the following reasons:

“i) The land is within an area which is designated for Landscape Protection in the North West Corridor Structure Plan (1992). The intention of the zone is to provide for the conservation of the environmental attributes of the land and to retain the rural character and amenity of the area. The proposed rezoning would not be consistent with this designation;

ii) The land is located within a Priority 2 Groundwater Source Protection Area and the proposed rezoning for Urban purposes could prejudice public water supplies;

iii) The land is in close proximity to the Telstra Telecommunications Facility and the proposed rezoning would interfere with telecommunication operations from the site which would be contrary to the public interest and conflict with the Commission’s Statement of Planning Policy No. 4 – State Industrial Buffer Policy; and

iv) There is an adequate supply of land zoned Urban and Urban Deferred in the Metropolitan Region Scheme and the land is not required for urban development or identified for urban purposes in the Metropolitan Development Program.”

In June 1998, the then Minister for the Environment, following referral to her by the EPA of its advice given upon the proposed scheme amendment, advised that she endorsed the EPA’s advice.

In 1999, proposed DPS2 was advertised (for a second time) for public submissions. It proposed that the subject land be mainly zoned General Rural. Many landowners made submissions seeking an urban type of zoning of the area.

Council could not uphold these submissions as DPS2 had to be consistent with the MRS which was zoned Rural. It did note however that the issues raised by the landowners could be further addressed through separate but related studies such as the Gnangara Land Use and Water Management Strategy (GLUWMS) study.

Telstra also made a submission (through BSD Consultants) which supported retention of the General Rural zoning of the area, and also the imposition of a Special Control Area (SCA) intended to prohibit uses which could interfere with the PITC’s operations. Council upheld the request for retaining of the General Rural zoning however did not support the imposition of a SCA.

In January 2001, the final GLUWMS was released by the State Government. This designated most of this subject area as ‘Precinct 64’, and this is what this area is now commonly referred to as.

A small portion of land in the south west corner of the subject area was found through the GLUWMS study to fall outside of the catchment of the Mirrabooka public water supply production bores. This small area is Precinct 64a under GLUWMS.

The GLUWMS recommendations for Precincts 64 and 64a are as follows:

Precinct

Recommended Priority State Gnangara UWPCA

MRS/TPS Category Long-Term Land Tenure

Implementation Strategy

Possible P3

Private

Possible Future Urban

Current land uses can continue. Priority 3 subject to the resolution of all planning issues and constraints and the approval of an agreed Structure Plan by Government which removes identified contamination risks.

64a

None

Private

Possible Future Urban

Current land use can continue. No longer in Mirrabooka UWPCA.

The GLUWMS study essentially found that the groundwater issue could possibly be resolved.

In early 2001, the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) established a ‘Landsdale Land Use Planning Working Group’ to assist in the coordination and progression of land use planning in Precinct 64.

The Working Group comprised representatives of DPI, the City, the ‘Precinct 64 Urbanisation Association’ (the landowners association), Telstra, Water and Rivers Commission, Water Corporation, and the Department of Environmental Protection.

A copy of the Working Group’s report (which includes a Land Use Concept Plan for the area) has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room.

At its meeting of 27 November 2001, the WAPC considered the Working Group’s report and decided to endorse it, with specific reference to the following conclusions:

“1. The Land Use Concept Plan to identify the land as Possible Future Urban, subject to successful lease negotiations between Telstra and the Department for Planning and Infrastructure and the resolution of all issues identified during the preparation of a Structure Plan for the area.

2. The Structure Plan to be prepared in accordance with the DPI publication, Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Structure Plans for Urban Release Areas 1992 and the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (Part 9).

3. The Structure Plan to include a more detailed investigation and analysis of the issues relating to the study area, and identify any appropriate management and mitigation measures that need to be implemented.

4. Liaison to occur with all relevant State Government Departments and the City of Wanneroo to discuss the issues in more detail, and to identify the requirements of each organisation as to how the issues need to be addressed in the Structure Plan.

5. A detailed site assessment to be undertaken to the satisfaction of the Department of Environment, Water and Catchment Protection that includes surveys of the flora, fauna and wetlands of the study area and recommends appropriate protection and management measures.

6. The land owners to liaise with the Department of Environment, Water and Catchment Protection regarding any buffers required around wetlands, and the management measures that should be incorporated into the Structure Plan.

7. Lease negotiations regarding land to the east of the Perth International Telecommunications Centre to be successfully concluded and the land be available for the expansion of the Centre, prior to the initiation of an amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme or City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2

8. Wherever possible and appropriate, retain and incorporate good quality native vegetation into the public open space system.

9. Liaise with the Department of Environment, Water and Catchment Protection regarding water sensitive urban design and other mitigation measures to protect ground water resources and incorporate these into the Structure Plan.

10. The Structure Plan should only include land uses which minimise the impacts on groundwater quality. Commercial or Industrial areas with land uses such as petrol stations, fast food outlets etc. should be excluded.”

Council considered the Landsdale Land Use Planning Group Report and the Commission’s decision upon it at its meeting of 26 February 2002. Council resolved to endorse the Commission’s decision and to advise the Commission that it wished to be advised as soon as the outcome of the negotiations occurring at that time between the Commission and Telstra (regarding the lease of the Commission land) was known.

Detail

Development Planning Strategies (DPS), on behalf of Stockland Trust Group (who is now the owner or contracted purchaser of roughly half of the properties in Precinct 64), has applied to the City, seeking initiation of an amendment to DPS2 to rezone the subject land to Urban Development, and seeking that the City request the WAPC to amend the MRS to rezone the area from Rural to Urban.

To demonstrate that urban zoning of the subject area is appropriate given the WAPC decision on the Working Group report referred to above, the applicant has submitted a proposed ‘Master Plan’ for the area. This aims to address and satisfy the relevant requirements identified by the WAPC. A copy of the Master Plan has been placed in the Elected Members’ Reading Room. A copy of the main Master Plan map forms Attachment 2 to this report.

Consultation

At this stage, only relevant government agencies have been consulted by Administration in its assessment of the Master Plan. Should the proposed amendments to the MRS and DPS2 reach the advertising stage, then opportunity will be provided for community consultation on those amendments, as well as the proposed supporting Master Plan. It is understood that DPS consultants have consulted with landowners in the area (in addition to Stocklands) in the preparation of the application. It should also be noted that Administration wrote to all landowners in the precinct in November of last year, inviting comments on an initial rezoning application which had been submitted at that time by Stocklands. Twenty three letters of support were received.

Comment

As stated above, the WAPC decision of 27 November 2001 outlined the various issues that needed to be addressed prior to the rezoning process commencing over the land. Several of these issues relate to the local government, and have been addressed as follows:

Preparation of a Structure Plan in accordance with DPI and City of Wanneroo requirements

The applicant has prepared a Master Plan, to support the rezoning request, and to demonstrate that the Precinct 64 area can be developed for urban purposes. A Master Plan differs from a Structure Plan in that it is a strategic document, providing guidance on land use and servicing proposals within the application area. Master Plans have no statutory force, and generally provide the background detail sufficient to support the rezoning of the land and to provide a basis for a more detailed Local Structure Plan (LSP) to be prepared.

A copy of the Master Plan has been placed in the Elected Members’ reading room. The main features of the Master Plan include:

· Precinct 64 being developed for urban purposes.

· Wetlands and bushland being incorporated into public open space areas.

· A major active public open space in the centre of the precinct.

· A commercial / business strip along Alexander Drive, between Landsdale Road and Kingsway.

· A primary school in the southern section of the precinct.

· A proposed primary road network including proposals for main pedestrian-cyclist routes and bus routes.

The Water and Rivers Commission (WRC) has raised concerns relating to the design and landuse provision of the Master Plan, particularly in relation to the extent of wetland buffer provided, and the provision of the business zone along Alexander Drive. These issues are examined further in this report.

It should be noted that, should the rezoning process be successful, a Local Structure Plan (LSP) for the Precinct 64 area will also have to be prepared prior to the subdivision and development of the subject land. An LSP would be required to address more localised planning issues such as:

· Contributions to the provision of abutting district distributor roads (Gnangara Road, Alexander Drive, Hepburn Avenue);

· Land acquisition for public open space, arterial road drainage, pedestrian separated crossings and the like;

· Upgrading Kingsway, Queensway Road and Landsdale Road to an urban standard;

· A Controlled Access Place system being provided for Kingsway (and possibly Queensway Road);

· Provision of a more detailed road network and zoning / density provision.

Detailed investigation and analysis of the issues related to the study area being undertaken, and identification of appropriate management and mitigation measures that need to be implemented

The applicants have undertaken an environmental assessment of the study area, which contains several recommendations for management of the environmentally significant sections of the study area. The plan has been referred to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and WRC. WRC has made the following comments, in relation to wetlands, stormwater and groundwater issues:

1. A proposed reduced buffer around Resource Enhancement (RE) category wetlands is not supported, and a 50-metre buffer is required. Where native vegetation occurs within proposed public open space surrounding a 50-metre wetland buffer, the buffer should be extended to include the vegetation.

2. Adequate fencing shall be erected at the applicant’s cost, around all wetlands and buffers within the study area;

3. The RE wetland and buffer areas should be rehabilitated with local species prior to the commencement of development of the land;

4. A Drainage and Nutrient Management Plan should be prepared at the time of preparing a Local Structure Plan;

5. Stormwater drainage design to reflect Urban Water Sensitive Design Principles;

6. Groundwater and water quality monitoring bores should be established in identified low lying areas as soon as practical to ascertain pre-development site conditions, and to assist in properly determining estimated maximum water table levels;

7. WRC is concerned about what types of activities could potentially be allowed in the proposed commercial and business centres, and how these uses will be controlled.

8. Wetland boundary definition still needs to be agreed with WRC.

These recommendations are supported. Points 2-5 should be addressed when the Local Structure plan for Precinct 64 is being prepared. Points 1, 6 - 8 should be further addressed through the Master Plan.

Liaison between State Government Departments and the City of Wanneroo to discuss the requirements of each organisation

The City has referred the proposed Master Plan to various State Government departments for their perusal. Various recommendations and comments have been received by the City and form the core of this assessment.

Detailed site assessment being undertaken of flora, fauna and wetlands within the study area

As stated, the applicants have undertaken an extensive environmental assessment of the study area. Several management recommendations have been put forward in the Report. While these are supported in principle, the DEP has not yet provided formal comment on the Report. However, given that the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) must ‘clear’ the proposal prior to it being publicly advertised, the amendment may be initiated, pending further analysis of the report by the EPA prior to advertising commencing. These management issues can adequately be dealt with through the future LSP process.

Lease negotiations regarding land to the east of the Perth International Telecommunications Centre to be successfully concluded

As part of the work of the DPI Working Group to facilitate the possible rezoning of the Precinct 64 area, it was agreed that Telstra’s concerns could be overcome through it leasing from DPI a 290 hectare site, located east of the current PITC. The applicants have asserted in their submission that negotiations between Telstra and WAPC are well advanced and should not impede the urban development of the Precinct 64 area.

However, Telstra has advised the City that their negotiations with the WAPC are at a preliminary stage only and that the rezoning should be delayed until such time as the negotiations have been successfully completed.

Given that the negotiations between WAPC and Telstra are outside of the City’s control, that the other issues related to the rezoning of the area are currently being resolved, and that the application will require the consent of the WAPC and EPA prior to advertising, it is considered that the scheme amendment could be initiated. However, given that around 18 months have now elapsed since the WAPC decision on the Working Group outcome report and the lease negotiations do not appear to have substantially progressed, the City requests that the WAPC and Telstra immediately finalise lease negotiations in time for the finalisation of these amendments.

It should be noted that the Master Plan was referred to the WAPC for comment, but no response has been received for consideration in this report.

Telstra is also still to provide advice upon the particular land use proposals contained in the Master Plan.

Protection of good quality native vegetation

The bushland located within Precinct 64 has not been identified as being regionally significant. There are no ‘Bush Forever’ sites located within the subject area, however there are several areas of remnant bushland. The Master Plan proposes to incorporate some of these areas of bushland into the public open space of the Precinct 64 development. While the City supports this principle, formal comment on this matter has not yet been received from the DEP. In this regard, it should be noted that the EPA must provide its written consent prior to the Scheme Amendment being initiated.

Protection of groundwater and management of landuses

The WAPC decision of November 2001 required that the design of the proposed Precinct 64 area should ensure that the impacts on groundwater quality are minimal. Development within the precinct should not include commercial or industrial areas, where landuses had the potential to damage groundwater quality. The design of the Precinct 64 development was to:

· Retain native vegetation wherever possible and appropriate;

· Retain Conservation Category Wetlands; and,

· Incorporate best practice water sensitive urban design and nutrient management principles.

As outlined earlier in this report, in response to the proposed Master Plan, the DEP and WRC have recommended several management measures for the protection of groundwater within the Precinct 64 area. It is expected that the area will be relaxed from a Priority 2 level of protection to Priority 3 (less stringent) based on the recommendations of GLUWMS. The WRC is concerned that the proposed business strip along Alexander Drive will adversely impact on the area’s groundwater. As such, the WRC have supported the rezoning proposal, subject to the following 2 conditions:

1. Rezoning of the area should preclude commercial and industrial activities as identified by the Water and Rivers Commission. This may preclude some conditional or compatible activities as identified in the Water Quality Protection Note: Land use compatibility in Public Drinking Water Source Areas;

2. The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme specifically precludes those activities identified by the Water and Rivers Commissions as not acceptable within the area.

With regards to Condition 2, the DPS2 allows for uses such as petrol station, fast food and the like to be approved for development in the business and commercial zones. These uses could, however, be controlled through the provision of a Centre Zone over the proposed business land, whereby landuses can be more strictly controlled. It is recommended that the Master Plan be modified to adequately address the WRC concerns.

Other Issues

1. In the past, there has been concern that the City should not put itself at any risk of being supportive of urbanisation of this area, then having claims made against it by Telstra should that change of use lead to some interference with the PITC’s operations. It is considered that provided that the City makes it clear that rezoning should not be finalised until the lease of the WAPC land is in place, and that the final Master Plan and LSP for the area must be acceptable to Telstra in terms of being compatible with the PITC’s operations, then the City should not be at any risk in this regard.

2. The Master Plan’s proposals will need to be substantially carried forward into the future LSP for the area, otherwise this will all have been a relatively pointless exercise. The proposals will therefore be important for all landowners in the area and it is therefore important that all landowners have adequate opportunity to comment on the proposals. This should be able to occur concurrently with the advertising of the scheme amendments.

3. It would be preferable if the wetland areas in the precinct were reserved Parks and Recreation Reserve under the MRS and acquired by the WAPC. This would enable greater opportunity for protection of future bushland in the area, and active recreation areas, with the main central POS area being currently particularly ‘tight’ in this regard.

4. The issue of POS ‘credits’ being claimed for the wetlands and drainage facilities needs further detailed consideration by the City and DPI.

Statutory Compliance

The amendment process will follow the statutory procedures outlined in the Town Planning Regulations.

Strategic Implications

Consideration of this amendment is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan, and in particular Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Plan, which seeks to prive a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:

1. REQUIRES that the following changes be made to the Master Plan for Precinct 64, East Landsdale, to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning and Development:

a) changes to reflect Water and Rivers Commission (WRC) and Department for Environmental Protection requirements in respect to buffers for wetlands, and maximum water table information in the area;

b) the wetlands and associated buffers being proposed for reservation for Parks and Recreation under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and the balance of the public open space proposals being adjusted accordingly, with such adjustment to also address:

i) public open space ‘credits’ for wetlands and drainage to be agreed with the City and the WA Planning Commission

ii) the adequacy of the proposed main active public open space area.

c) changes to reflect land use constraints required by WRC in respect to groundwater quality protection, and as required by Telstra in respect to protecting the operational integrity of the Perth International Telecommunications Centre (PITC);

d) it be marked as a ‘draft’.

2. Subject to submission of a modified Master Plan to satisfy 1. above, in pursuance of section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act (as amended) PREPARES Amendment No. 25 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone the land which is in the eastern portion of Landsdale which is bounded by Gnangara Road, Alexander Drive, Hepburn Avenue reserve and the eastern boundary of the land which is presently zoned Urban or Urban Deferred under the Metropolitan Region Scheme, to Urban Development zone and Parks and Recreation Reserve (for the wetlands and associated buffers);

3. SUBMITS Amendment No. 25 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for consent to advertise for public submissions.

4. REFERS Amendment No. 25 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act.

5. REQUESTS the Western Australian Planning Commission through the North West District Planning Committee, to amend the Metropolitan Region Scheme to rezone the land referred to in 2. above to Urban and Parks and Recreation Reserve (in respect to the wetlands and associated buffers).

6. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission, the applicant and Telstra that although it is seeking initiation of the scheme amendments referred to in 2. and 5. above, it considered that the proposed lease by Telstra of the Western Australian Planning Commission land east of the PITC land should be in place prior to these amendments being finalised. Initiation of the proposed scheme amendments at this time will allow a commencement of the rezoning and Master Plan finalisation processes, while still allowing ample time for the Western Australian Planning Commission and Telstra to be able to conclude their lease negotiations. In this regard, it is noted that about 18 months have now elapsed since the Commission decision on the Landsdale Land Use Planning Working Group Report and that lease negotiations have been in progress for at least that long. For Telstra to still be referring to these as ‘preliminary negotiations’ is of concern, and Council urges both parties to give the matter utmost priority with a view to seeking resolution as soon as possible.

7. REQUIRES that when the scheme amendments for the subject land are advertised for public submissions, the draft Master Plan (as modified pursuant to 1. above) is also advertised at that time for public submissions, so that all landowners may have opportunity to have input to the preparation of the final Master Plan for that area.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD04-07/03 Review of Cell Costs for East Wanneroo Cell 6 : Madeley-Darch.

File Ref: SP0007

File Name: BAReview of cell Costs for East Wanneroo Cell 6 Madeley Darch .doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 20 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by shb Date 13 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by T Neale Date 15 May 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: T Neale

Meeting Date: 20 June 2003

Attachments 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider submissions received following public notification of adopted revised cell costs estimates for East Wanneroo Cell 6.

Applicant	Not applicable
Owner	Various
Location	Madeley and Darch
Site Area	598.35 hectares
DPS 2 Zoning	Residential, Urban Development

Background

At its meeting held on 25 February 2003, (item PD06-02/03), Council adopted revised nett cell costs estimates of $31,068,170 for East Wanneroo Cell 6.

The adoption of nett cell cost estimates for Cell 6 is provided for in Part 10 of District Planning Scheme No 2 (DPS2). Clause 10.11.5 provides that following revision or amendment of the cell costs estimates Council is to notify affected landowners by way of public notification in a newspaper advising them of the availability of details of the review and inviting comment.

Five submissions were received within the period allowed for comment.

Detail

Each of the submissions received were made by Drescher and Associates, Planning and Development Consultants on behalf of five separate clients. All of the submissions deal solely with the value that has been attributed to the areas of historic open space within the cell for which certain owners are entitled to be paid a proportional sum of the value of the Reserves. The objections are on the grounds that the cell cost estimate of the value assigned to historic open space is too low. The areas that contributed historic open space within the cell are shown by diagonal hachuring on the plan at Attachment 1.

Part 10 of DPS2 specifies that the historic open space that certain owners are entitled to receive a proportional payment is payable at the time an owner subdivides or develops his holding.

The objections argue that the historic open space areas should be revalued at the same time as the other cell cost elements are reviewed and have the same current market value applied to them.

In the submissions, the objector refers to Council’s previous consideration of the issue when it adopted revised cost estimates for the cell on 9 April 2002 (item PD01-04/02).

Part 10 of DPS2 provides that any objection received is to be assessed and if not agreed by Council is to be referred by Council to the arbitration of a single arbitrator in the manner provided by the Commercial Arbitration Act 1985. If the parties are unable to agree on the arbitrator, the arbitrator may be appointed by the President for the time being of the Law Society of Western Australia, or its successor.

Consultation

DPS2 requires any revised cell cost estimates to be publicly advertised by way of a newspaper advertisement allowing a 42 day period for the lodging of objections.

Comment

At the time Council adopted the revised cost estimates in April 2002 it accepted that it should adopt the same value that was current at the time for both the new areas of public open space and the existing or historic areas. The primary reason for this was because cell cost estimates that had been in general circulation prior to then attributed the same value to both categories of open space. Some time after these cost estimates had been in circulation, Administration perceived there was an inherent inequity in applying the same value to areas of Crown reserves that had been given up as open space by the subdivision of rural landholdings over the last 40 years, as that applied to recent purchases of small landholdings that were ripe for residential subdivision. Accordingly, Administration attempted to reduce the value to be applied to the historic open space to one tenth of the then current average value it would apply to the new areas of public open space. However, during advertising of this proposal, an objection was received by one developer in the area who had made purchases of land for subdivision in reliance on the cost estimates previously advertised.

Based on legal advice Council accepted that for the purpose of its initial adoption of the cell cost estimates, the areas of historic open space should have the same value applied to them as was applied to the new areas of public open space at that time.

The requirement for council to give public notification and invite submissions on the revised cell cost estimates it adopts from time to time is found in clause 10.11 of DPS2. The preamble to that clause requires an owner who lodges an objection to submit with the objection supporting evidence from a suitably qualified person in the specific field of the cost estimate being objected to. The objections lodged by Drescher and Associates on behalf of its clients do not comply with this requirement as they do not include any supporting evidence that establishes the value that is to be applied to large areas of undeveloped Crown reserves that have no reasonable prospect of being made available for sale or development and were created some decades ago. In fact, based on a recent Supreme Court decision, Administration considers that due to the intrinsic environmental value of some historic open space Reserves, the values currently ascribed to those historic Reserves are too high. Accordingly, Administration is reviewing this matter further with a report to be presented to Council once this review is completed.

There has been considerable activity by the private sector in purchasing land for residential subdivision in the districts of Madeley and Darch and it is obvious that the average whole of cell valuation rate that is currently being used in Council’s cost estimates is significantly below the rate that developing subdividers are claiming as compensation for land ceded for cell works.

The current cell costs estimates adopted by Council on 25 February 2003, were based on an average land value of $495,800 per hectare with a further ten per cent allowance for solatium for new areas of public open space and arterial road reserves, and a value of $370,000 per hectare without solatium for the areas of historic open space (based on Councils initial adoption of cell costs).

Since the adoption of those values the City has received claims for compensation from three subdividers who are required to set land aside for new public open space. Each of these claims is accompanied by a valuation from a qualified valuer commissioned by each of the subdividers.

The individual areas of public open space involved comprise 0.5262 hectares, 1.1000 hectares and 2.4047 hectares. The valuations submitted suggest per hectare values of $1,043,029, $729,699 and $635,258 respectively prior to the application of a ten per cent solatium allowance. When the solatium allowance (where appropriate) and cell cost contributions are adjusted the respective per hectare rates that are being claimed become $1,147,332, $802,669 and $698,784.

The disparity between these examples demonstrate the difficulty encountered in attempting to determine a per hectare rate that can be applied throughout the cell for cost estimation purposes. Equally evident is the importance for Council to reflect appropriate land values in its cell cost estimates if it is to achieve the acquisition of the public open space sites and arterial road reserves that are shown in the agreed local structure plan. These examples suggests that the minimum value Council should adopt for the remaining areas of new open space and arterial road reserves that are to be acquired should be at least $683,000 per hectare prior to solatium.

The cost of acquiring the arterial road reserves for the cell has been included in each of the cell cost reviews undertaken to date. However, the arterial road construction estimates have not been comprehensively reviewed since 1996, and an examination based on the recent actual construction costs for Hepburn Avenue and other current data indicates that an increase in the order of $1,929,928 is warranted. The increase applicable to each road is shown in the following table.

Road Previous Estimate Current Estimate

Skeit Road $2,013,193 $2,538,725

Hepburn Avenue $1,806,888 $1,852,359

Gnangara Road $ 785,050 $1,823,527

Mirrabooka Avenue $1,005,000 $1,325,448

TOTAL $5,610,131 $7,540,059

The effect of these increases, will be to increase the aggregate net cell costs to $38,699,110. The infrastructure cost per lot will therefore increase to $11,082.98.

The cell lot yield used for the purpose of apportioning the cell cost estimates as provided for in clause 10.6.2 of DPS2 is 9 lots per hectare. The Agreed Cell Structure Plan has been examined to determine if an amendment to that rate is appropriate. The analysis suggests that the lot yield should not be modified.

Statutory Compliance

DPS2 requires Council to review all cell costs on at least an annual basis and in any event prior to the commencement of each new financial year. When reviewing the cell costs, Council is to review the estimated lot yield for the cell and the infrastructure cost per lot having regard for the actual lots produced, the remaining cell works, any amendments to the cell structure plan and any other factors the Council considers relevant. These matters were considered and incorporated into the current review where changes have occurred.

Strategic Implications

The revision of the estimated cell costs will ensure that sufficient funds are available to complete the cell works. This is consistent with the Healthy Communities Goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide and maintain infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The revision of the cell cost estimates will set the new infrastructure cost per lot that will be needed to recover the estimated cost of achieving the cell works.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. NOT UPHOLD the objections submitted by Drescher and Associates, Planning and Development Consultants regarding the value attributed to the areas of historic open space within the cell.

2. REFERS the objections submitted by Drescher and Associates to arbitration by a single arbitrator as prescribed by Part 10 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

3. ADOPTS a revised figure of $38,699,110 as the current Nett Estimated Cell Costs applicable to East Wanneroo Cell No.6.

4. AUTHORISES public notification of the revised cell cost estimates for East Wanneroo Cells 6 in accordance with the requirements of Part 10 of District Planning Scheme No.2.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PD05-07/03 Proposed Local Structure Plan for Lots 2, 303 and 304 Two Rocks Road, Yanchep – Capricorn Coastal Village

File Ref: SP/0055V01

File Name: BAYanCap.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by ch Date 16 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 2

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider a proposed Local Structure Plan (LSP) for Lots 2, 303 and 304 Two Rocks Road, Yanchep.

Applicant	Roberts Day Town Planning and Design
Owner	Tokyu Corporation
Location	Lots 2, 303 and 304 Two Rocks Road, Two Rocks
Site Area	Approximately 202 hectares
DPS 2 Zoning	Urban Development, Private Clubs/Recreation, Parks and Recreation Reserve

Background

The subject land forms part of the Tokyu Corporation’s St Andrews Project, which relates to some 4352 hectares of land in the Yanchep/Two Rocks localities. A plan indicating the location of the subject land is included as Attachment 1.

The goals of the St Andrews Project, as set out in a Strategic Cooperation Agreement (SCA) between the State Government, WA Planning Commission, Tokyu Corporation, Yanchep Sun City and this City and are split into two key elements:

1. The development of the St Andrews landholding based on:

a) Around 55 000 serviced residential lots, with a population of some 148 000;

b) 50–60 000 jobs with the first 1 000 being created between 2003 and 2008;

c) A regional strategic commercial centre; and

d) Approximately 1 600 hectares of Regional Open Space.

2. The development of the land in a manner which is:

a) Environmentally, socially and economically sustainable;

b) Recognises and uses worlds best practice in urban design wherever possible;

c) Accords with relevant state and local government policies; and

d) Places a high priority on encouragement of public transport usage.

The SCA identified a number of strategic projects to be undertaken including the creation of employment opportunities through the IDEAS Project (an Acronym for Innovation, Development, Employment and Applications Strategy) and the commencement of residential development.

The IDEAS project has identified a number of projects that will create employment opportunities within the structure plan area, including an aged care facility with 130 beds and 200 independent living units. The Commonwealth Government has recently approved funding for this project contingent upon stage 1 of the facility (66 beds) being operational by June 2004. It is estimated that this facility will provide some 120 direct jobs and an additional 200 indirect jobs, as well as act as a catalyst for other forms of development.

The Capricorn Coastal Village Structure Plan provides the context for the subdivision and development of the aged care facility, as well as the initial stages of residential development for the St Andrews Project.

Detail

Proposal

The structure plan area comprises some 202 hectares of land, located between the Yanchep townsite and the northern edge of the Club Capricorn Holiday Village. The key elements of the structure plan include:

1. 2,615 residential lots with a range of density codes between R5 and R80;

2. Centre zones (Coastal, Village and Corridor) incorporating 14,000 m² of retail floor space and 38,000m² commercial floor space.

3. Mixed use zones to facilitate home based business;

4. A 9.9 hectare aged care site for 130 beds and 200 independent living units;

5. 18.4 hectares of public open space, representing approximately 10% of the site;

6. Two primary school sites and a 5,000m² community purpose site.

The structure plan caters for a future population of approximately 7,600, with a target workforce of 2,280. This represents a net employment self-sufficiency ratio of 60%.

A copy of the structure plan map is included as Attachment 2. A complete copy of the structure plan reports have been placed in the Elected Members reading Room.

Planning Context

In 1993, the then Department of Planning and Urban Development released the Yanchep Structure Plan as an addendum to the North West Corridor Structure Plan (NWCSP). This regional plan outlined the extent and location of future urban land, regional open space, the regional transportation network, as well as the location of major commercial, industrial and other employment areas. The plan indicated the structure plan area as tourist and recreational development (to reflect the development intentions of the land at that time) and future urban.

In 1996, the St Andrews Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) amendment set in place the current (largely) Urban MRS zoning for the structure plan area. In 2000, Amendment 787 to the City’s former Town Planning Scheme No.1 was gazetted, which rezoned the land consistent with the MRS. The current zoning of the structure plan area under DPS No. 2 is Urban Development and Private Clubs/Recreation, with the foreshore area reserved for Parks and Recreation.

The Structure Plan is consistent with the zoning of the land, with the exception of Lot 2 (the Club Capricorn site), which is zoned Private Clubs/Recreation, and a small area in the north west corner of this lot which is Reserved for Parks and Recreation. Council, at its meeting on 10 June 2003 resolved to initiate an amendment to DPS2 to rezone the portion of Lot 2 which is zoned Private Clubs/Recreation to Urban Development, to provide for flexibility in the planning of the structure plan area and overcome any zoning conflict. The structure plan should however be modified prior to advertising to ensure that it is consistent with the MRS Parks and Recreation Reserve.

In March 2002, a non-binding Enquiry by Design (EBD) Workshop was held for the southern part of the applicant’s landholding (known as the Southern Project), which included the current structure plan area. The workshop had the following aims:

1. To address and review the district and regional context and infrastructure;

2. To prepare a concept plan for the Southern Project area;

3. To address and review transportation infrastructure, particularly the railway alignment, relative to the Two Rocks Northern Precinct Structure Plan; and

4. To integrate existing communities into the proposed expansion.

The guiding philosophy of the workshop was to create a context and structure, based on the principles of the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy, with a strong emphasis on transit based employment and the aim of achieving an ultimate population of 150 000 people with 60 - 70% employment self sufficiency.

The key outcome of the workshop was a St Andrews Conceptual Framework Plan, along with an alternative option. Although there were many similarities between this plan and the 1993 Yanchep Regional Structure Plan, the workshop concluded that that the regional structure for the area should be further refined.

Consultation

The applicant has already undertaken an extensive preliminary process of community consultation, to ensure that the planning process is well informed by local values and sentiment. The consultation techniques undertaken to date include a community information hotline, three editions of a newsletter, two community workshops, open days and displays, a telephone survey, community feed back forms and specific youth consultation at the Yanchep High School.

The results of this preliminary consultation have been fed into the design process, with key issues including dune preservation, housing diversity, retention of natural topography in subdivision design, vegetation protection and enhanced passive recreation areas.

The applicant is intending to undertake further similar community consultation in coordination with the statutory advertising period for the LSP.

Administration has also sought preliminary comments from a number of relevant State agencies including the Department for Planning and Infrastructure, Department of Education and Training, Main Roads WA, Water Corporation, Department for Conservation and Land Management, Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Indigenous Affairs and the Waters and Rivers Commission. The agencies are generally supportive of the LSP, although a number have requested additional information and minor changes. Key issues are included in the comment section of this report. The additional information and changes can generally be undertaken prior to Council considering adoption of the structure plan following the advertising process. Any exceptions are set out below.

DPS2 requires that all new structure plans be publicly advertised, prior to Council considering adoption of the plan. A structure plan of the nature currently proposed would normally be advertised for a period of 42 days. However, given the amount of community consultation that has already been undertaken by the applicant a 28 day advertising period is requested in this case.

Comment

District Planning

The goals of the St Andrews Project require a very high level of coordination and planning integration. A broader plan for the district is needed to guide development and ensure that its best practice objectives are achieved.

This particular local structure plan area however does not significantly impact on district or regional issues, with the possible exception of the north eastern portion of the plan, which is in close proximity to land reserved under the MRS for Central City Area. Given the urgency required to progress the structure plan to facilitate the development of the aged care facility, it is recommended that a notation be placed on the structure plan prior to advertising, indicating that the north eastern portion of the plan (generally north of the aged care facility site) may be subject to change and that this matter be discussed in further detail between the applicant, the DPI and the City, during the advertising period.

An agreement should also be reached that until a District Structure Plan is prepared, no further local structure plans should be lodged with the City for the applicant’s landholding. Part of this agreement should include a time frame for lodging the District Structure Plan. A separate report which deals with this issue in more detail has been prepared for consideration by Council at this meeting.

Residential Density

The structure plan will provide for approximately 2,615 residential lots, including an aged care site and approximately 200 independent retirement units. The residential density coding that will apply to the structure plan, ranges from R5 to R80 with the higher density areas being located on local distributor roads, in close proximity to the foreshore areas and at commercial nodes. The lower density areas are promoted as landscape preservation areas. The predominant coding throughout the area is R30.

The residential density code map was not included into the statutory section of the structure plan, which is required to enable a statutory basis to the residential densities.

This should be included and the statutory section should also be modified to reflect the appropriate formatting prior to advertising.

Traffic

Traffic assessments undertaken by the applicant indicate that Wanneroo Road only has the capacity to cater for an additional 1,358 lots in the Yanchep/Two Rocks localities. The applicant has however commenced a project to coordinate the early extension of Marmion Avenue northwards to Yanchep Beach Road, and is aiming to have this undertaken by approximately 2005/06. Ongoing monitoring will be required throughout the staged development of the overall locality to ensure that the capacity of Wanneroo Road is not exceeded. In regard to this structure plan, a condition should be imposed to ensure that no new lots are created once the capacity of Wanneroo Road has been reached, unless an alternative access is available to the area.

A Deed of Infrastructure exists between the landowner and the WAPC. This deed sets out an agreement in relation to the provision of regional infrastructure in the overall Yanchep/Two Rocks localities, including the provision of regional roads. In relation to the structure plan area, Lots 2 and 304 do not abut any regional roads and therefore have no obligations. The deed does however require that Lot 303 provides for:

1. The full upgrade construction of Yanchep Beach Road between Two Rocks Road and Marmion Avenue;

2. A 50% contribution towards the extension of Marmion Avenue between Yanchep Beach Road and Toreopango Avenue (on the northern boundary of the structure plan area); and

3. A 50% contribution towards the construction of Toreopango Avenue adjacent to the northern boundary of Lot 303.

Further discussions will need to be undertaken prior to final adoption of the structure plan regarding a plan for the staged construction of these roads and the method of contribution.

Given the number and spacing of existing intersections along Yanchep Beach Road and the relatively high future traffic volumes, further detail will be required in relation to access configuration to both the north and south sides of this road, to ensure safe and convenient access. This review has already commenced and the outcomes should be incorporated in the structure plan documentation prior to advertising being undertaken.

Further detail on the form, function and staging of Two Rocks Road (including the proposed one way pair system and the early provision of pedestrian/bicycle access southwards to the existing Yanchep townsite) and the main east-west road to the north of the aged care facility site will also be required prior to the Council considering final adoption of the structure plan.

Foreshore Area

The structure plan proposes a coastal road along its boundary with the foreshore reserve. Further information is required on the detailed alignment and design of this coastal road to ensure that it is sufficient to cater for its function and also to ensure that its design character and that of development on the eastern side of the coastal road is appropriate to the coastal setting.

The coastal road should be designed to link with development to the south and with a clear link to future development to the north. This structure Plan also provides an opportunity to commence discussions with the relevant State agencies to improve the alignment of Brazier Road from Yanchep Beach Road to the coast.

The applicant is proposing to prepare a foreshore management plan and this is scheduled to be prepared prior to the time when Council will be due to consider the adoption of the structure plan. This foreshore management plan should address the above issues.

Environmental Issues

The overall Yanchep/Two Rocks area was subject to an Environmental Review as part of Amendment 787 to the City’s former TPS1. The review addressed the potential impacts of the rezoning and required the preparation of a number of management plans as part of subsequent structure planning. The matters to be addressed in the management plans included vegetation and fauna; karst management; stygofauna and troglobitic fauna management, waste management; drainage, nutrient and water management and aboriginal heritage.

ATA Environmental has submitted a detailed environmental assessment for the structure plan area, however the management plans are still in the process of being prepared. These will need to be finalised to the satisfaction of the Department of Environmental Protection prior to Council considering final adoption of the structure plan. If significant changes to the LSP are required as a result, the Local Structure Plan may need to be re-advertised.

The ATA assessment indicates the presence of Melaleuca cardiophylla (Mc) within the structure plan area. This is a locally significant species and the structure plan does not propose to retain any of this vegetation. Further discussions should be undertaken with the DEP and DPI to determine whether this stand of vegetation could be viably retained. This can be undertaken during the advertising period and prior to the Council considering the final adoption of the structure plan.

Public Open Space

Sixteen independent areas of public open space have been identified, with a variety of functions for both active, passive and vegetation retention purposes. The area totals some 18.4 hectares, which represents 10% of the net residential area.

Whilst the distribution of open space appears to be generally acceptable, further discussion and site evaluation is required for the various open space areas. Confirmation is also required that sporting ovals and associated facilities can be adequately accommodated on the areas identified for such purposes. In addition, an area of open space should be provided within the first stage of subdivision to ensure local residents are effectively serviced. These matters can adequately be undertaken during the advertising of the structure plan.

School sites

The location of the two primary schools are supported by the Department of Education and Training. There is however some concern over the configuration of the school sites and the design, width and provision of paths within the adjoining roads. These matters can also be adequately dealt with during the advertising period.

Employment

An employment assessment has been undertaken by JHD Advisors, which targets an employment self-sufficiency for the structure plan area of 60%. The structure plan provides land for employment activities in the coastal, village and corridor centres. While the assumptions put forward regarding self-contained employment percentages appear reasonable, a number of questions still remain outstanding. Given that the industry distribution of potential jobs in the structure plan area has been calculated by averaging figures across industry types and classifications, no further attempts at employment value-adding appears to be sought. This is likely to result in merely reproducing existing employment patterns within Wanneroo, which has resulted in extremely low levels of self-sufficiency to date.

The assessment is also lacking in the description of how the residential based businesses can benefit from such things as broadband infrastructure. Encouraging these small businesses will increase the number of jobs created and sustained within the local area. There needs to be a detailed section on the exact type of broadband infrastructure that is to be installed, as it is widely known that various 'varieties' are indeed not future-proof.

A section devoted to incentives, assistance and other schemes to fuel further small business development is also needed, as well as clarification on the adequacy of the land set aside for employment purposes.

These matters can adequately be undertaken during the advertising period.

Retail Floorspace

The coastal, village and corridor centres proposed in the structure plan provide for a total of 52,000m² of retail floor space. Limited justification is provided to support this extent of retail. Whilst employment creating initiatives are supported, a District Retail Strategy needs to be prepared prior to allocating such significant retail floor space. Reference to the Corridor Employment Centre and its associated retail floor space should therefore be deleted from the retail floor space schedule of the structure plan and the retail for the remaining centres be limited to 3,000 – 4,500 m², pending further consideration in the District Structure Planning for the broader area.

General

A range of other relatively minor matters such as including reference to clearing of Unexploded Ordnance, adjustments to the proposed path systems and adjustments to the open space schedule will also be needed to be undertaken. As these are minor matters, they can adequately be dealt with during the advertising period, prior to Council considering final adoption of the structure plan.

Statutory Compliance

Section 3.14 of DPS2 states that the objectives of the ‘Urban Development Zone’ are to:

a) designate land for future urban development;

b) provide for the orderly planning of large areas of land for residential and associated purposes through a comprehensive structure planning process;

c) enable planning to be flexible and responsive to changing circumstances throughout the developmental stages of the area.

To meet these objectives, DPS2 requires that an Agreed Structure Plan be prepared and adopted prior to any subdivision or development proceeding.

Clause 9.4.1 of DPS2 provides that in considering a Structure Plan, Council may exercise its discretion and determine that either the Structure Plan is satisfactory for public advertising, that it may be advertised following the inclusion or modification of specified matters or that the Structure Plan should not be agreed to for stated reasons.

Strategic Implications

Consideration of this structure plan is consistent with Goal 2 of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and the provision of quality services and infrastructure.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 DETERMINES that the Capricorn Coastal Village Local Structure Plan, as submitted by Roberts Day Town Planning and Design on behalf of Tokyu Corporation, should not be advertised until the following specified matters have been included in it or have otherwise been attended to by the proponent:

a) The north western portion of the structure plan area being modified to ensure that it is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Reservation under the Metropolitan Region Scheme.

b) A notation being placed on the structure plan maps indicating that the north eastern portion of the plan, generally north of the aged care site, may be subject to change.

c) The statutory section being appropriately formatted and provided with a Residential Density Code map.

d) A condition being included within the statutory section to ensure that no new lots are created or land developed within the structure plan area once the capacity of Wanneroo Road has been reached, unless an alternative access is available to the area.

e) A review being undertaken of the longer term access arrangements to Yanchep Beach Road with the recommended option being included in the structure plan documentation.

f) A condition being included in the statutory section to ensure that a suitable area of open space is included in the first stage of subdivision.

g) Deletion of the reference to the Corridor Employment Centre and its associated retail floor space from the retail floor space schedule and the retail for the remaining centres being limited to 3,000 – 4,500 m², pending further consideration in the District Structure Planning for the broader area.

2. Upon the matters specified in 1, above being included in the structure plan documentation or otherwise attended to by the proponent ADVERTISES the proposed structure plan under the provisions of Clause 9.5.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 for a period of 28 days.

3. ADVISES the proponent that prior to adoption of the structure plan it will require the following matters to be satisfactorily undertaken and addressed in the structure plan:

a) Discussion with the Department for Planning and Infrastructure and the City to determine the most appropriate manner to deal with the north eastern portion of the structure plan are which is in close proximity to the Central City Area zoning of the Metropolitan Region Scheme.

b) Discussion regarding the staging and method of contribution for the construction of the regional roads identified in the Deed of Infrastructure (between the WA Planning Commission and Tokyu Corporation) as being the responsibility of land within the structure plan area.

c) Additional detail on the form, function and staging of Two Rocks Road (including the proposed one way pair system and the early provision of a pedestrian cycle access to Yanchep Beach Road) and the main east-west road to the north of the aged care site.

d) The preparation of a foreshore management plan for the foreshore area abutting the structure plan area. The plan should, amongst other things, address the alignment and design of the coastal road and the character of development to the immediate east of the coastal road.

e) The preparation of the various environmental management plans required by the Environmental Conditions set out in Schedule 12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.

f) Discussion with the Department for Planning and Infrastructure, Department of Environmental Protection and the City regarding the viability of retaining the stand of Melaleuca cardiophylla.

g) Confirmation of the suitability of the various areas of open space from a vegetation, landform and development perspective.

h) The configuration of the primary schools and the design, width and pathway provision to the adjoining roads being revised in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Education and Training and the City.

i) Further information regarding the employment assessment including, the industry distribution of jobs, residential based employment, provision for broadband infrastructure, the adequacy of the land set aside for employment uses and incentives, assistance and other schemes to assist the promotion of small business.

4. ADVISES the applicant that no further local structure plans should be lodged with the City, which involves residential development as a primary focus, until a District Structure Plan for the Yanchep/Two Rocks area has been lodged.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

PAW / Temporary Road Reserve Closures

PD06-07/03 Requested Closure of Part of Karmoy Place, Mindarie.

File Ref: R22/0012V01

File Name: DARequested Closure of Pedestrian Access Way Between Castellon Entrance and Karmoy Place Mindarie.doc This line will not

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by ch Date 11 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by T Neale Date 04 June 2003be printed Please do NOT delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: T Neale

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

To consider the permanent closure of a pedestrian only section of a road reserve.

Background

A 14 signature petition requesting closure of the pedestrian only section of Karmoy Place that leads to Castellon Entrance, Mindarie has been received. The petition was signed by the owners/occupiers of 13 separate properties in Castellon Entrance, Karmoy Place, Mersin Drive and Bowen Lane. The closure has been requested on the grounds of unspecified incidents of anti-social behaviour that are said to occur within or near the subject section.

Detail

The subject section connects the residences in Bowen Lane and Karmoy Place with the neighbourhood centre at the intersection of Rothesay Heights and Anchorage Drive as shown on Attachment 1. Rothesay Heights and Anchorage Drive are bus routes and there is a bus stop located outside the centre. A child care centre with frontage to Rothesay Heights adjoins the subject section opposite the applicants’ residence.

The subject section of road reserve is 11.02 metres wide with a centrally positioned asphalt path, bordered by privacy height shrubbery on either side. There are traffic barrier posts at the Castellon Entrance end with a street light on the south side of Castellon Entrance. An additional street light is also located on the west side of the Karmoy Place-Bowen Lane intersection.

Consultation

The request for closure was advertised for a period of 35 days concluding on 13 May 2003. Advertising was undertaken by way of a notice in the local newspaper, onsite signs at either end of the subject section and individual letters to the residents of the 17 properties in Karmoy Place, Bowen Lane and Cristobal Crescent who would be most affected by the closure.

There were six letters of objection received from residents of Bowen Lane. The objectors all state that the subject section is used frequently and in some instances daily for access to the medical centre, shops and bus route by the aged, other adults and children. Some objectors state they have never witnessed or heard of any anti-social behaviour.

There are water, sewer, gas and underground power services located within the subject section. Each of the service providers has objected to the closure, but all are prepared to withdraw their objection if the applicants undertake to meet all plant modification costs and grant associated service easements. The applicant has agreed to these conditions.

The Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) has stated it does not object to the closure of this section of road as it does not form part of a cycle/pedestrian network and the closure is unlikely to impact significantly on journeys to the local facilities as there are alternative routes.

Comment

The petition requesting closure was signed by the owners/occupiers of 13 properties in Castellon Entrance, Karmoy Place, Mersin Drive and Bowen Lane including the applicant but four of those would not normally use the subject section. Separate letters of objection to closure were later received from the residents of four of the properties in Bowen Lane who had previously signed the petition suggesting that support for closure by the local community is not strong.

The extent of utility services within the subject section suggests it has an important service function. The distance to the bus stop outside the medical centre in Rothesay Heights from the north end of the section is 112 metres. If the pedestrian only section is closed the distance would be 362 metres, via Bowen Lane/Cristobal Crescent/Rothesay Heights or 242 metres by the alternate route of Karmoy Place/Mersin Drive/Castellon Entrance. The extra distance to be travelled by the first alternate route is 250 metres for a one-way journey and for the second alternate route it is 130 metres.

This section of road reserve is both wider and shorter than the traditional four metre wide PAW found in older residential areas. The anti social behaviour complained of has not been specified, however, it is understood to be mainly loud or rowdy behaviour by some younger users. There is good separation between the central pathway and the adjoining residence and entry over the property fence from the subject section would be difficult given the generally open aspect. On balance it is considered that the pedestrian only section should remain open to fulfil its intended access and service function.

The owners of the child care centre which adjoins the subject section have not responded to the City’s letters therefore if closure is approved the whole of the land will need to be amalgamated into the applicant’s property at Lot 15 Castellon Entrance.

Statutory Compliance

The land is part of the dedicated road reserve of Karmoy Place and its closure, if agreed, would therefore need to follow the provisions of section 58 of the Land Administration Act. Under this section, Council is required to forward to the Minister for Lands copies of all submissions received on the requested closure together with Council’s comments on those submissions. The Minister will then consider granting approval to the closure.

Strategic Implications

Retention of this section of the road is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide and maintain infrastructure to meet the needs of our community and also support safe and secure communities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

That Council DOES NOT SUPPORT the permanent closure of part of Karmoy Place, Mindarie.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Delegated Authority Reports

PD07-07/03 Development Applications Determined by Delegated Authority for the Month of May 2003

File Ref: S09/0009V01

File Name: FADevelopment Applications determined by Delegated Authority for the Month of May 2003.doc This line will not be

Level 4 Approval by shb Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by shb Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by hw Date 11 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by hw Date 11 June 2003printed Please do NOT delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Issue

Development Applications determined by Planning and Development between 1 May 2003 and 31 May 2003, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.

Background

Nil

Detail

The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Design Codes (R Codes.)

The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures with between 80 to 130 development applications being received per month in addition to an average of 400 to 500 building license applications.

Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to Council Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.

Council Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.

Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 May 2003 and 31 May 2003, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Nil

Statutory Compliance

A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 03 September 2002 (item CE03-09/02 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.

Strategic Implications

This report is consistent with the corporate management and development goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority.

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning and Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1 May 2003 and 31 May 2003.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A survey was undertaken with 401 householders who were residents, randomly selected from within the seven wards that comprise the City of Wanneroo. Respondents were surveyed about their interest and willingness to pay for an increased number of bulk rubbish collections, including the option of a skip.

Overall, 57.9% of respondents stated they need to dispose of large amounts of bulk rubbish and 47.4% of respondents stated they have large amounts of green refuse to dispose off.

Only two-fifths (40.1%) of respondents surveyed were aware that the annual refuse rate charged by the City of Wanneroo is $119.

A majority (55.6%) of respondents stated they would like to have two verge collections per year. On average, those who wanted additional verge collections are prepared to pay $8.78 for each additional verge collection. The trade-off analysis revealed that residents are highly price sensitive with the cost of the service, representing 70.8% of the decision in relation to bulk rubbish.

It was explained to respondents that Council is considering whether it should supplement or replace the current verge collection service with a skip bin service, with up to three skip bins provided per household per annum. When asked whether they were interested in the service and how much extra in addition to the current annual refuse rate they would be prepared to pay for the skip bin service, the largest proportion (47.5%) stated they are not interested in the skip bins. A further 19.1% said they did not know how much they would be prepared to pay. Based on those who would be interested in a skip bin and could give a value, the average extra annual refuse amount people were prepared to pay was $27.71.

The research found, through various trade-off simulations, that the current service provision of only one verge collection could be increased to two per year with an additional refuse rate increase of $9. This would result in greater satisfaction among residents in comparison to the current level, or offering a skip bin service instead of verge collections.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

The City of Wanneroo is considering whether or not to increase its bulk rubbish collections and is exploring the option of a skip bin service as used by Bayswater.

The survey was designed to provide the City with an understanding of the optimum service desired by residents and residents’ propensity to pay for an increased service, either increase bulk rubbish collections or a skip service which could be called out up to three times a year for a flat fee.

The results are outlined in the following pages of this report.

2.1 Research Objectives

The purpose of the study was to determine the optimum combination of bulk rubbish collections or skip bin collection desired by residents within the City of Wanneroo. Specifically the research objectives were to:

· Determine awareness levels of the current refuse rate charged by the City of Wanneroo.

· Establish whether householders have a need for disposing of large amounts of household refuse in addition to the regular rubbish collections.

· Determine the number of bulk rubbish collections residents would like to have per annum.

· Calculate the average dollar value residents are prepared to pay for additional bulk rubbish collections.

· Determine if residents are prepared to pay for the proposed skip-bin system and how much.

· Identify the relative importance of the different collection types and price.

· Determine if the current refuse provision can be improved and if households are prepared to pay for improvements.

· Identify differences which may exist between respondent demographics and Wards.

2.2 Research Approach

This section of the report details the research method followed in conducting the research on behalf of the City of Wanneroo. This approach was discussed with and agreed upon with representatives from the City of Wanneroo prior to the commencement of the research.

2.2.1 Population and Sampling

The population for the purpose of the research was all residential dwellings within the geographical boundaries of the City of Wanneroo. In each dwelling the male or female householder was surveyed. A final sample of 401 households was taken in the research. The sample was stratified by the seven wards which comprise the City of Wanneroo. Within each Ward the sample was collected randomly, ensuring each household was given equally probability in being selected and administered the questionnaire.

The sample produces a sampling error of ± 5.0% at the 95% confidence interval. That is to say, we are 95% confident that the results obtained in the research would be within ± 5.0% of the results if a census was undertaken with every household within the municipality. A sampling error of ± 5.0% is recommended and accepted by the Auditor General of Western Australia for research undertaken on behalf of government departments.

2.2.2 Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire employed in the research was developed by Research Solutions in close associated with the City of Wanneroo. The formulation process involved an interactive process between the Consultants and representatives from the Council, including review by Council committees.

The final questionnaire was checked and tested prior to being administered in the data collection stage of the project. A copy of the questionnaire is appended to this report.

2.2.3 Data Collection

The questionnaire was administered to respondents over the telephone by professional trained and experienced telephone interviewers. Prior to the data collection stage, the lead consultant of the project personally briefed all interviewers to ensure they clearly understood the purpose of the project, understood the administering of the trade-off ‘conjoint cards’ and could clarify any questions the interviewers had during the briefing.

Lists of telephone numbers were randomly generated from an electronic copy of the current White Pages for each of the seven Wards, telephone numbers were randomly selected from the lists and the telephone number called. The interviewer asked to speak to the householder, who was administered the questionnaire. In cases where the householder was unavailable, due to being out, answering machine pick-up, etc, the telephone number was tried an additional three times over the course of the data collection phase before a replacement number was selected. The process ensured that every opportunity was given for people to be invited to participate in the survey.

In ensuring that the data collected was robust and potential respondent bias was minimised, those who worked in local government, refuse collection or market research were excluded from the research.

The interviewing process continued until a total sample of at least 400 respondents was achieved. Throughout the interview process, professionally trained interview supervisors monitored, checked and managed the process ensuring the highest level of quality was achieved. All completed interviews were checked and 10% of all interviews were validated by supervisors, ensuring the accuracy and robustness of the collected data.

2.2.4 Statistical Analysis

The collected data was analysed using SPSS statistical software. The data was analysed using a number of statistical techniques including, frequencies, descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, various tests of significance and conjoint analysis (trade-off).

2.2.5 Sample Profile

The sample obtained in the research can be considered representative of the population of the City of Wanneroo. The composition of the sample is detailed in the table below.

3 Demographic

(n=400)

4 Gender

Male

Female

50.1

49.9

5 Age

18-24 years

25-34 years

35-49 years

50-64 years

65+ years

3.7

17.7

35.4

28.9

14.2

6 Household Structure

Young, under 35 years no children

Family with children at home

Older, 35 yrs and over no children

8.0

55.1

36.9

Annual Income (pre tax)

Under $20,000

$20,000-$39,999

$40,000-$59,999

$60,000-$79,999

$80,000-$100,000

Over $100,000

Refused

Don’t know

21.7

24.2

22.7

12.0

5.7

3.2

7.2

3.2

7 Ward

Alexander

Central

Coastal

Hester

North

South

Wanneroo

14.7

13.5

14.5

14.2

3.0 BULK RUBBISH NEEDS

In addition to the normal weekly rubbish collections, respondents were asked if they have large amounts of household items and green waste that they need to dispose off. Around three in five respondents (57.9%) stated they need to dispose of large amounts of bulk rubbish. The largest proportion of respondents (47.4%) stated they have large amounts of green refuse that they need to dispose off. The table below details the findings.

Figure 1: Need for Bulk Rubbish

(n-401)

Items in addition to normal rubbish cart collection – 57.9%

Females (62.0%) were significantly more likely than males (53.7%) to say they have a need for bulk rubbish collections. Further, those aged under 50 years (63.2%) were significantly more likely to have a need for bulk rubbish collections than were older respondents (50.9%).

3.1 Awareness of Annual Refuse Rate

Only 40.1% of respondents surveyed stated they are aware that the annual refuse rate charged by the City of Wanneroo is $119. The remaining 59.9% stated they were not aware of the refuse rate. Awareness increases to 44.7% among home owners.

Figure 2: Awareness of refuse rate

(n=401)

The research found that males (45.3%), compared to females (35.0%), were significantly more likely to be aware of the annual refuse rate. In addition, those aged 35 years and over (44.1%) were significantly more likely to be aware of the refuse rate than were younger respondents (25.6%). Of no surprise, those who own their own home (44.7%) were found to be significantly more likely to be aware of the refuse rate compared to renters (11.1%).

3.2 Additional Verge Collections

Respondents were asked how many bulk rubbish collections they would like to have per year. The majority (55.6%) stated they would like two verge collections per year. The figure below details the distribution of additional verge collections mentioned by respondents.

Figure 3: Number of rubbish collections in total (n=401)

Based on those who said they wanted extra collections, when asked how much respondents would be prepared to pay for each additional collection, nearly half (47.4%) stated they were not prepared to pay any more for extra collections. A further 22.1% stated they were prepared to pay but did not know how much.

The average price respondents who wanted extra verge collections are prepared to pay for each additional collection was calculated to be $8.78. The preparedness to pay distribution of respondents who want extra collections is detailed in the table below.

Table 2: Preparedness to pay for extra collections

Prepared to pay	% (n=400)
Zero extra	47.4
$1-$10 extra	10.8
$11-$25 extra	11.3
Over $25 extra	8.4
Yes but don’t know how much	22.1

3.3 Preparedness to Pay for Skips

It was explained to respondents that Council is considering whether it should supplement or replace the current verge collection service with a skip bin service, with up to three skip bins provided per household per annum. When asked how much extra in addition to the current annual refuse rate they would be prepared to pay for the skip bin service, the largest proportion (47.5%) stated they are not interested in the skip bins. A further 19.1% said they did not know how much they would be prepared to pay. Based on those who would be interested in a skip bin and could give a value, the average extra annual refuse amount was calculated at $27.71.

Figure 4: Preparedness to Pay for Skip Bins

(n=401)

Respondents aged under 50 years (64.0%) were significantly more likely to be interested in the skip bin concept than older respondents (38.2%).

3.4 Willingness to Use Skip Service

It was explained to all respondents that the skip bin service would not allow the recycling of bulk rubbish placed in the skip. For the majority of respondents (72.8%) this would not impact upon their use of a skip bin if they wanted to use that service.

Figure 5: Willingness to Use

(n=401)

72.8%

3.5 Bulk Refuse Modelling

In order to determine the optimum level of service and the associated pricing of the service, a trade-off analysis was undertaken. Respondents were given 11 alternative combinations of bulk rubbish collection service and asked to score each on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is not interested and 10 is extremely interested. The computer could then calculate a respondent’s preference to any other combination of price and service preference. The information collected from respondents was analysed using a trade-off statistical technique to determine the relative attractiveness of each of the potential refuse service offerings.

The figure below illustrates that the cost of the service is the most important aspect in the decision.

Figure 6: The cost of the service is the biggest influence on the decision

Whether a skip bin service is provided or not exhibits the lowest level of importance – suggesting that respondents do not consider the service as essential and would rather not have a rate rise.

3.6 Model Simulations

A number of simulations were undertaken to determine the price-preference probability of the various bulk rubbish collection methods.

3.6.1 Two Bulk Rubbish Service

The impact of price on demand was estimated in increments of $4.50 for $0 annual price of the service offering two bulk verge collections per where no skip-bins were offered. Figure 7 depicts the price-preference curve for two bulk verge collections per annum.

Figure 7: Price elasticity for two bulk verge collections

Price elasticity for two bulk rubbish services is 0.56, i.e. for each dollar increase in price, demand decreases by 0.56.

3.6.2 Skip Bin Service

For the provision of skip-bins, prices were estimated in increments of $4.50 for $0 increase to $72 increase in annual refuse rate. Simulations estimated the probability preferences for each price, where skip-bins were offered in place of a verge collection. Figure 8 depicts the price-preference curve for skip-bin collections per annum.

Figure 8: Skip-Bin Price - Preference Probability Curve

Clearly identifiable between figures 7 and 8 is the preference probabilities for having two-bulk verge collections per annum which is greater than having skip-bins. Furthermore, the price elasticity of two-verge collections (0.56) is closer to perfect inelasticity (0), that is any increase in price does not impact on demand compared to skip-bins (Єp = 0.72), indicating that preference probability for two bulk verge collections is a less price sensitive option than skip-bins.

Given that the relative importance of price is significantly greater than changing the number of verge collections or implementing skip bins, analysis was undertaken to determine whether various combinations of refuse would be more acceptable to households than what is currently offered. Using the findings of average preparedness to pay for additional verge collections and skip bins various modelling simulations were conducted.

The simulations revealed that an increase of one additional verge bulk rubbish collection at a $8 annual refuse rate increase exhibited the highest preference amongst householders. This was in comparison to either the current service provision (one verge collection) or the provision of up to 3 skip bins per annum with an additional refuse rate increase of $43. Options offered are shown in the table below.

Simulations	Verge Collections	Skip bins (3 per year)	Price Increase
Current Offer	1	None	$0.00
2 Verge collections	2	None	$8.00
Skip bin offer	0	Yes	$43.00

The conjoint simulation preference results are shown in figure 9 below.

Figure 9: Preference Levels

Householder preferences for two verge collections at a range of prices from $0 to $70 compared to a skip bin is illustrated in figure 10 overleaf.

Householder preferences for two verge collections at an incremental price of $0 to $13 over the current service is shown in figure 11 on page 15.

The research then focused upon home owners and as can be seen, the results are very similar.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

Male 1 Research Solutions 20233

Female 2 City of Wanneroo Bulk Refuse Study

Ward Number [________]

Edited by:..................................................................... Validated by:................................................................		Questionnaire ID

Interviewer name:.........................................................	ID.............................
Start time:......................................................................
Finish time:....................................................................
Interview length:...........................................................

Good morning/afternoon/evening. My name is …………. from West Coast Field Services. We are undertaking a survey on behalf of Research Solutions and the City of Wanneroo. Please may I speak to the householder/decision maker for the household?

(Repeat introduction and check you are speaking to the owner.)

My name is ....................... from West Coast Field Services. We are doing a survey on behalf of Research Solutions for the City of Wanneroo. The survey will take about eight minutes to complete. You are under no obligation to participate; however all information provided to us I the survey is kept confidential and only aggregate results are reported. This is guaranteed under federal law By helping with this survey you can have a say in the type of bulk refuse service provided by Council

S.1 Do you or anyone in your family work in:

Local government	1
Refuse collection	2
Market research	3	Terminate
None of these	4

Q.1a Firstly, I'd like to talk about your rubbish requirements. Thinking about household refuse in addition to your normal rubbish cart collection, do you have large amounts of:

Green refuse (tree loppings, weeds) 1

Household items for bulk verge collection 2

No 3

Q.1b Are you aware that your current annual refuse rate is $119?

Yes 1

No 2

Q.2 The Council is thinking of increasing the number of bulk rubbish verge collections from the one verge collection per year. If the Council were to offer an additional verge collection:

a) How many bulk rubbish collections would you like to have per year?

b) How much extra on your rubbish rate are you prepared to pay each year for each extra collection?

Don't know 9

Q.3 The Council is considering whether it should supplement or replace its verge collection service with a skip bin. The skip bin is 3 cubic meters, one of the small ones you may have seen. We advise it will not be able to recycle any green waste you put into the bin. If you could ring up and have a skip bin delivered to your home to put your bulk rubbish in up to a maximum of three times a year, note there would be a 3 to 6 week waiting period for the bin. How much extra on your rubbish refuse rate would you be prepared to pay for the skip?

Not interested in a skip 8

Don't know 9

Q.4 Council is considering providing one or two bulk rubbish collections and/or a skip service. The skip bin service will enable you to ring up and order a skip bin to be delivered to your home to put your bulk rubbish in. There is a waiting period of 3 to 6 weeks for the skip and you can order a skip up to a maximum of three times a year, however the contents cannot be recycled. The cost will be in addition to the refuse rate you currently pay. Imagine the Council was trying to decide which to introduce.

The options are: 1 or 2 bulk collections a year and/or a skip bin with the refuse rate increasing by up to $73 a year. The current service costs $15 of the refuse rate.

For each of the 11 combinations of service and price, please give me a score out of 10 to show how interested you are in that service, where 1 is no interest and 10 is very high level of interest. Please use the whole scale.

Rotate

□ Option 1: The current service & 1 bulk rubbish collection, no skip provided on request and no increase in the refuse rate

[__________]

□ Option 2: No bulk rubbish collections, a skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $39

[__________]

□ Option 3: 2 bulk rubbish collections, a skip provided on request and

an increase in the refuse rate of $73

[__________]

□ Option 4: 1 bulk rubbish collection, a skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $73 [__________]

□ Option 5: No bulk rubbish collections, no skip provided on request,

increase in refuse rate of $73

[__________]

□ Option 6: 2 bulk rubbish collections, no skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $39

[__________]

□ Option 7: 1 bulk rubbish collection, a skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $39 [__________]

□ Option 8: No bulk rubbish collections, a skip provided on request,

No increase in rates [__________]

□ Option 9: 2 bulk rubbish collections, a skip provided on request,

no increase in refuse rate

[__________]

□ Option 10: 2 bulk rubbish collections, no skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $8 [__________]

□ Option 11: 1 bulk rubbish collection, and a skip provided on request

and an increase in the refuse rate of $54

[__________]

Q.5 The skip service does not allow for recycling any of the contents of the skip. To what extent does this preclude you considering this service? No option to recycle would:

Definitely stop me using the skip service under any circumstances 1

Probably stop me using the skip service 2

Make me think twice about the service but would not stop me

Using it if I needed it 3

Would not make any difference to me 4

Q.6 Which age group do you belong to?

18 - 24 years 1

25 - 34 years 2

35 - 49 years 3

50 - 64 years 4

65+ 5

Q.7 Which of the following describes your household?

Young single/sharing accommodation 1

Young couple with no children 2

A family with youngest child aged 12 or under 3

A family with youngest child a teenager/

adult living at home 4

An older couple without children living at home 5

Older single/widowed/divorced 6

Q.8 Do you own or rent this property?

Own 1

Rent 2

Q.9 Lastly. which of these is closest to your annual household income pre-tax? (Read out options)

Under $20,000 1

$20,000 - $40,000 2

$40,000 - $60,000 3

$60,000 - $80,000 4

$80,000 - $100,000 5

Over $100,000 6

Refused 7

Don't know 9

THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE SURVEY

For validation purposes I require your name and telephone number.

Respondent's name....................................................................................................

Telephone number......................................................................................................

Thank you for your time. Just to remind you, my name is.................... from West Coast Field Services. If you have any questions about this research you can telephone our office on (08) 9316 3366.

INTERVIEWER

I hereby declare that I have completed this questionnaire fully in accordance with my instructions and that the interview was conducted according to the ICC/ESOMAR international code.

Name.......................................................................................................................................

Signature.................................................................... Date...................................................

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Infrastructure

TS05-07/03 Hainsworth Leisure Centre Redevelopment - New Fire Booster System - Budget Variation

File Ref: PA13/0002

File Name: EAHainsworth Leisure Centre Redevelopment New Fire Station Budget Variation.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Janek Sobon

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: 2

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a second budget variation to enable the City to meet the statutory requirement for a new fire booster system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

Background

At its meeting on the 29 April 2003 Council endorsed (Item TS18-04/03 refers), the following:

“1. ENDORSES the supply and installation of a new fire service system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre to ensure statutory compliance.

2. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the expenditure of $70,000 on the construction of a new fire service system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

3. NOTES the following budget variation to reflect the additional expenditure of $70,000 on the construction of a new fire service system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

Cost Code	From	To	Description
Project No 3001	$70,000		Broadview Park Public Amenity
Project No 1011		$70,000	Hainsworth Leisure Centre Redevelopment”

This work is associated with the refurbishment works, which are currently being constructed by Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd (Item TS04-11/02 refers).

Detail

As there is a lack of water pressure in the street water mains the City, as the owner promoting refurbishment work at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre, is now statutorily obliged to provide an on site fire booster system to meet the residual pressure requirements to satisfy the BCA and AS2419.1 (1990) in order to deliver water at a pressure of 200kPa for fire fighting use. This requirement was not anticipated or addressed during the tender documentation stage of the Hainsworth Leisure Centre refurbishment work and was only raised as an issue in March/April 2003 when field tests were undertaken to check compliance with the current residual pressure requirements.

The initial hydraulic design and building requirement proposal has been finalised and presented to Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) for its information. Deficiencies were highlighted by FESA and it was found that the fire booster system proposal was not scoped to fully meet its requirements. Attachments 1 and 2 show the required extent of the fire booster system and specialist hydraulic equipment requirements.

As the current refurbishment work being undertaken by Badge Constructions is practically complete it has been determined that the City project manage the supply and installation of the hydraulic equipment and the construction of the fire booster system.

Given that supply of the hydraulic equipment has a longer lead time than construction of the building works, it is proposed that the works be let in two parts. The first stage will be for the building work, which will be undertaken by a building contractor. The second stage will be for the supply and installation of the hydraulic equipment, which will be undertaken by a plumbing contractor with the City acquiring by direct purchase the supply of the water storage tank (a specialist pressure vessel) and pump set to be installed, that is, the specialist hydraulic equipment.

The following quotations excluding GST were received for the building work:

Palace Homes & Construction Pty. Ltd.	$36,100
Badge Constructions Pty. Ltd.	$44,290
Homestead Constructions	$48,960

The water storage tank and pump set can be procured from Allied Pumps at the following cost, exclusive of GST:

Serena Sectional Panel Tank	$30,125
Diesel Electric Fire Protection Pump Set	$23,341

The following quotations, excluding GST, were received for the installation of the hydraulic equipment being provided by Allied Pumps:

Tony Cecic	$12,461
C & R Riordan Plumbing And Gas	$17,550
MA Hall Plumbing Pty. Ltd.	$48,028

Consultation

The Bollig Design Group provided consultancy services for the design and documentation of the architectural building works and Volume Design Group for the hydraulic works.

Comment

The objective of this report is to inform Council as to the further measures that need to be undertaken for the provision of an adequate fire booster system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre and to seek its endorsement for the provision of additional finance to fund the prescribed works.

The proposed works will be undertaken outside of the current contact with Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd. and every effort is being made to minimise the delay that will be experienced in the commissioning of the refurbished Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

The refurbished Hainsworth Leisure Centre will be practically complete before the end of June 2003 and thereafter available for internal fit out and commissioning by the City. The Hainsworth Leisure Centre will not be available for use by user groups until the completion of the fire booster system.

It is advised that to minimise time delay, an overseas supplier is able to airfreight the water storage tank (ex stock) for arrival within four weeks of placement of order, with the cost of airfreighting being $3,400. The completion of the project would then be subject to the construction of the building works which on discussion with the builder has been advised as being six weeks from placement of order. Supply of the pump set will take four-five weeks, with supply sourced locally. On this basis, the project would then be completed by 1 August 2003 given both the building works and the tank (air freighted) have been ordered prior to Council’s consideration of this report. Both orders amount to a total of $69,625, which is within the $70,000 budget previously approved by Council. City Administration chose to proceed on this basis given:

a. The work is a statutory requirement and needs to be completed before the public can use the refurbished Centre.

b. Council has already approved funds of up to $70,000.

c. Minimise time delay between Council consideration for additional funds required to carry out the works and opening of the facility for public use.

Statutory Compliance

It is a statutory requirement to satisfy the Building Code of Australia - AS2419.1 (1990), Water Corporation and Fire and Emergency Services Authority of WA (FESA) that the City, as owner of the Hainsworth Leisure Centre, ensures that an adequate water pressure is available for the Fire Brigade to fight a fire on its property.

Strategic Implications

The construction of the alterations and additions to the Hainsworth Leisure Centre is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2002-2005 goals and strategies:

“Healthy Communities”

2.6 “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The previous report to Council regarding the fire booster system (Item TS18-04/03 refers), was based upon a preliminary scope of work as provided by consultants, Volume Design Group, to which was assigned the cost estimate of $70,000 for the works.

This previously endorsed cost estimate has proved inadequate with the quoted costs for the works being:

Equipment
Serena Sectional Panel Tank	$30,125
Diesel Electric Fire Protection Pump Sets	$23,341
Air Freight (tank)	$3,400
Builders Work
Palace Homes & Construction Pty. Ltd.	$36,100	(lowest quotation)
Plumbing Work
Tony Cecic's Hydraulic Contractor	$12,461	(lowest quotation)
Subtotal	$105,429
Contingency 3%	$3,160
Consultants Fees
Volume Design Group (Hydraulic)	$540
Robinson Structural	$1,155
BEST engineering (Electrical)	$200
Bollig Design Group	$1,750
TOTAL PROJECT COST	$112,234
Less funds previously assigned for these works	$70,000
Additional Funding Required	$42,234

The balance of funds will be drawn from Broadview Park, as this project did not proceed in view of widespread community opposition. Subject to Council’s acceptance of this recommendation, an amount of up to $56,000 is available from Project No 3001 Broadview Park Public Amenity for reallocation.

In order to minimise time delay, Palace Homes and Construction Pty. Ltd. has already been contracted to undertake the building work and the water storage tank inclusive of the air freight ordered from Allied Pumps to ensure completion of the project by 1 August 2003.

On Council’s endorsement of the recommendations of this report Tony Cecic, hydraulic contractor, will be contracted to undertake the plumbing work and an order placed with Allied Pumps for the supply of the pump set.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, the expenditure of $42,234 on the construction of a new fire booster system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

2. NOTES the following budget variation to reflect the additional expenditure of $42,234 on the construction of a new fire booster system at the Hainsworth Leisure Centre.

Cost Code	From	To	Description
Project No 3001	$42,234		Broadview Park Public Amenity
Project No 1011		$42,234	Hainsworth Leisure Centre Redevelopment

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

(A full size copy of this attachment will be available for viewing in the Chambers.)

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Funding and Budget

TS06-07/03 State and National Black Spot Programs 2002/03

File Ref: R/0001V01

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

Author: Harminder Singh

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

File Name: FAState and National Black Spot Programs 2002 03.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a budget variation to accommodate the costs associated with the 2002/2003 National and State Black Spot Programs.

Background

At its meeting on 6 November 2001 Council endorsed a submission which included six projects for consideration as part of the 2002/2003 State Blackspot Program (SBP).

Council also approved the submission of three projects for provision of funding under the 2002/2003 National Black Spot Program (NBP) at its meeting on 9 April 2002 (Item TS04-04/02 refers).

Council subsequently approved these projects in the 2002/2003 Capital Works Program. Since then Council has considered further reports (Items TS12-02/03, TS05-03/03 and TS 06-02/03 refer) and approved changes to some items.

This report now provides an update on the final approved projects and current financial position.

Detail

The details of the projects approved under the National and State Black Spot Programs 2002/03 is tabulated below:

Project Number	Description	Budget
3217	Franklin Road	$154,000
3218	Buckingham Drive	$50,000
3211	Mirrabooka Avenue/Montrose Avenue/Koondoola Avenue intersection roundabout modifications	$324,000
3212	Highclere Blvd	$50,000
3213	Wanneroo Road / Villanova Street	$65,623
3214	Beach Road / Alexander Drive	$107,000
3215	Wanneroo Road / Elliot Road	$95,000
3216	Pinjar Rd / Clarkson Ave	$75,000

The budget provisions for these projects were made based on the preliminary cost estimates determined from the concept plans which formed part of the project submissions for the National and State Black Spot Programs. Construction works associated with all of these projects were scheduled to be undertaken during the 2002/03 financial year and the current progress status is detailed below:

Project Number	Description	Budget	Projected Final Expenditure	Current Status
3217	Franklin Road	$154,000	$207,000	Major Works Complete
3218	Buckingham Drive	$50,000	$50,000	Complete
3211	Mirrabooka Avenue/Montrose Avenue/Koondoola Avenue intersection roundabout modifications	$324,000	$324,000	Works in Progress
3212	Highclere Blvd	$50,000	$50,314	Complete
3213	Wanneroo Road / Villanova Street	$65,623	$78,312	Complete
3214	Beach Road / Alexander Drive	$107,000	$107,000	Major Works Complete
3215	Wanneroo Road / Elliot Road	$95,000	$95,987	Complete
3216	Pinjar Rd / Clarkson Ave	$75,000	$83,197	Complete

A review of the expenditures for the projects has highlighted that insufficient allocations were made for some items, which were unforeseen but necessary for the safe and proper execution of the projects.

Project Numbers 3217 included relocation of power poles and related infrastructure by Western Power at a cost of $30,859 which was not known at the time of making submissions to the National Black Spot Program.

Similarly, for Project Numbers 3213 and 3215, Main Roads Western Australia while approving the design plans for these projects, required the City to comply with its construction standards and traffic safety requirements. This resulted in the works period being restricted between 9.00am to 3.00pm and implementation of traffic management devices as per MRWA approval.

Project Number 3216 required street lighting modifications at a cost of $8,130 instead of $4,000 included in the estimated cost at the time of project submission.

In view of the expenditures incurred to fully complete the scope of works for these projects, it is proposed to amend the budget for these projects as follows.

Project Number	Description	Budget	Projected Final Expenditure	Variance
3217	Franklin Road	$154,000	$207,000	$53,000
3218	Buckingham Drive	$50,000	$50,000	$0
3211	Mirrabooka Avenue/Montrose Avenue/Koondoola Avenue intersection roundabout modifications	$324,000	$324,000	$0
3212	Highclere Blvd	$50,000	$50,314	$314
3213	Wanneroo Road / Villanova Street	$65,623	$78,312	$12,689
3214	Beach Road / Alexander Drive	$107,000	$107,000	Nil
3215	Wanneroo Road / Elliot Road	$95,000	$95,987	$987
3216	Pinjar Rd / Clarkson Ave	$75,000	$83,197	$8,197
TOTAL				$75,187

It is proposed to accommodate the variance by reallocating unexpended funds from Project Number 2111 - Hester Avenue. All major works associated with the Hester Avenue dual carriageway project are now complete and funds in the order of $250,000 will remain unexpended. This is due to the reduction in scope of works near Hidden Valley Retreat in response to the Quinns Road railway crossing project associated with the Northern Suburbs Railway Extension by the State Government.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

Submissions seeking funding for projects under National and State Black Spot Programs are made during August / September every year for allocation of funding in the following financial year. The detailed design is prepared only after these projects are approved by Council in its Capital Works Budget for the year in which these projects are constructed. Therefore, budget cost estimates are based on the concept plans which are prepared to support the submissions. The detailed design identifies a more well determined scope of work to be undertaken in comparison to the initial scope and the final project costs therefore sometimes can be higher than the initial estimated costs.

In this instance, these projects had to accommodate the need to alter services and to meet the requirements of MRWA which resulted in a variance to the costs.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The construction of these projects under this program is aligned with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goal and strategy:

“Healthy Communities

2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The shortfall in funding for the approved 2002/2003 National and State Black Spot Programs is $75,187. Major works associated with Hester Avenue dual carriageway – Project Number 2111 are complete and the sufficient funds remain in this project for re-allocation to meet the $75,187 funding shortfall.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the following budget adjustments to accommodate the shortfall in funding allocations for the National and State Black Spot Program projects in the 2002/03 Capital Works Budget

Cost Code	From	To	Description
Project Number 2111	$75,187		Hester Avenue
Project Number 3217		$53,000	Franklin Road
Project Number 3212		$314	Highclere Blvd
Project Number 3213		$12,689	Wanneroo Road / Villanova Street
Project Number 3215		$987	Wanneroo Road / Elliot Road
Project Number 3216		$8,197	Pinjar Rd / Clarkson Ave

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Other Matters

TS07-07/03 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Audits for Various Infrastructure Assets

File Ref: PA7/0009V01

File Name: GAEnergy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Audits for Various Infrastructure Assets.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by jan Date 18 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

Author: Alan Millard

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the status of energy audits carried out on various building and infrastructure assets and the proposed implementation of greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies and energy operating costs in 2003/2004.

Background

In consideration of the City’s Local Environmental Strategy in relation to the “Enhanced Greenhouse Effect” key focus area, the City’s Building Services Consultant, Lincolne Scott Australia Pty Ltd, were engaged to conduct an energy audit of various City infrastructure assets. The aim of this audit was to identify potential energy savings with the intent of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy operating costs.

The outcomes of the audit will also form part of the information being supplied as part of the City’s involvement with the Cities for Climate Protection Program.

Detail

The energy benchmarking audit comprised of the following:

· Categorising buildings into groups based on type of building and its use (small, medium and large).

· Energy accounts were reviewed for each building for a twelve month period on a $/m2 basis to determine a benchmark for each category of building.

· Benchmarks were compared to the Property Council guidelines and historical information where possible. Where costs/consumption were on or above the benchmark line, these buildings were chosen for further investigation and development of strategies.

The City is currently proactive in energy management and is implementing upgrades and alterations to installed systems to increasing efficiency and reduce energy consumption. However, Lincolne Scott’s audit has identified a further number of additional energy saving actions, which will have a potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from various building and infrastructure assets, and as a direct consequence save energy operating costs.

The main areas within the City’s operations that would result in measurable benefit are:

· New Civic Centre

Electricity is the predominant energy source being approximately 96% of energy consumption within the building, with the majority of the electricity being consumed by mechanical services, they being, air cooled chillers, four large air handling units and computer room units which serve the main office areas. The audit identified proposed energy saving actions in relation to lighting sensor installations, chiller pump alterations and staff energy use awareness programs, that will have a potential total energy cost saving of up to 7.2%. This equates to $12,000 per annum with an anticipated reduction of 136.5 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.

· Bore Pumps

It was highlighted that building assets on six of the City’s parks had a high energy consumption, which on investigation was found to be associated with inefficient and oversized bore pumps. The audit identified proposed energy saving actions in relation to replacement of the bores and/or installation of variable speed drives. This will have a potential total energy saving of up to 56% $16,935 per annum with an anticipated reduction of 121 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.

It was also recommended as part of the bore pump investigation that the City monitor one of the irrigation systems in order to measure effectiveness of any upgrading works over a twelve month period. If successful this could be used as a model for future parks and the refurbishment of existing over subsequent financial years.

Other strategies for various buildings were also included in the audit reports. These are of a minor nature that can be implemented at operational levels.

Consultation

Nil

Comment

It is proposed that the strategies identified in the audit reports are to be included in future budgets over the next two to three years as they will form part of operational and capital works budgets. The implementation of these strategies will assist the City in significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption (operating cost) by energy demanding building and infrastructure assets. Appropriate monitoring/benchmarking will need to be undertaken to measure performance following any upgrading works undertaken.

It is therefore proposed that the City target various parks to replace oversized and inefficient bore pumps, including setting up Cabrini Park as a model irrigation system, along with lighting and chiller modifications at the New Civic Centre in 2003/2004.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The City’s 2002-2005 Strategic Plan recognises the importance of efficient energy use as part of its “Environmental Sustainability” strategy. The strategy directly addresses the following Strategic Plan action:

“Environmental Sustainability

1.3 Support efficient use of water, energy and other resources”

Policy Implications

The audit strategies may highlight several factors that may affect policy development in relation to energy management principles for existing, new and proposed building and infrastructure assets.

Financial Implications

$50,000 has been included as a New Initiative within the draft 2003/2004 Parks Operating Budget for the replacement of several bore pumps, with the intent to reduce energy consumption due to the current inefficient and oversized bore pumps.

$25,000 has been included within the draft 2003/2004 Parks Operating Budget for the capture of detailed data for all parks and also to set up Cabrini Park as a model irrigation system.

$50,000 has been included within the draft 2003/2004 Building Maintenance Budget to install various energy saving devices within the City’s building assets.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council notes that various greenhouse gas emission and operating cost reduction strategies are proposed to be carried out on various building and infrastructure assets in the 2003/2004 financial year.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Corporate Services

Finance

CS01-07/03 Warrant of Payments for the Month Ended 31 May 2003

File Ref: S13/0002V01

File Name: BAWarrant of Payments for the Month ended 31 May 2003.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 18 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 13 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 13 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil.

Attachments: Nil

Author: Manager Finance

Meeting Date: 1/7/2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of May 2003, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.

Background

Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.

In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.

Detail

The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in May 2003:

Funds	Vouchers	Amount
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers	35365 - 36274 50000727 – 50000782	$4,067,373.85
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account	01-31 May 2003	$4,829,379.09
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme Accounts	N/A	N/A

At the close of May 2003 outstanding creditors amounted to $934,031.19.

Consultation

Nil.

Comment

The list of cheques and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of May 2003 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) regulations 1996.

Statutory Compliance

Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.

Strategic Implications

Nil.

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council RECEIVES the list of cheques drawn for the month of May 2003, as summarised below:-.

Funds	Vouchers	Amount
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers	35365 - 36274 50000727 – 50000782	$4,067,373.85
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account	01-31 May 2003	$4,829,379.09
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme Accounts	N/A	N/A

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Warrant of Payments for the Month of May 2003

City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account

Cheque No	Cheque Date	Vendor Name	Amount	Details
35365	CANCELLED		$0.00
35366	CANCELLED		$0.00
35367	CANCELLED		$0.00
35368	01-May-03	DEWSONS MERRIWA	$16.20	MILK FOR FAMILY DAY CARE ACTIVITIES
35369	01-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$3,436.80	LEGAL FEES - ISSUE SUMMONS - RATES DEPARTMENT
35370	01-May-03	RENTOKIL INITIAL PTY LTD	$1,082.40	DISPOSAL OF SANITARY DISPOSAL UNITS
35371	01-May-03	MIKE THORP-BUILDER	$38,377.90	CONSTRUCTION WORKS GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PROJECT NO. 3006
35372	01-May-03	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$547.34 $503.09	SUMMONS - P/N 187040 AND P/N 183883 WARRANT OF EXECUTION JO 521-2002 - RATES DEPARTMENT
35373	01-May-03	BUBBLEMANIA	$346.75	COMMUNITY EVENT - YOUTHWORKS FOR OCTOPUS'S GARDEN AND FOR MARANGAROO EGGFEST
35374	01-May-03	SUNCITY NEWSAGENCY	$60.12	YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS LIBRARY PAPER DELIVERY
35375	01-May-03	THE PARTY FARM	$460.00	MARANGAROO EGGFEST - JOHN MALONEY PARK
35376	01-May-03	HIRE INTELLIGENCE	$1,644.50	4 WEEKS HIRE OF COMPAQ PROLIANT SERVER – IT SERVICES
35377	01-May-03	WANNEROO NORTH P/L	$112.92	RATES REFUND – P/N 201675
35378	01-May-03	G DAY	$297.00	RATE REFUND – P/N 111040 OVERPAYMENT ON RATES
35379	01-May-03	WEST COAST CRICKET CLUB	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35380	01-May-03	MARQUEE MAGIC	$1,108.60	ERECT MARQUEES FOR MARANGAROO EGGFEST
35381	01-May-03	BALLAJURA SOCCER CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND
35382	01-May-03	ROADMARKING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION	$240.00	SEMINAR 2003 - PAVEMENT MARKING FOR JOHN WONG
35383	01-May-03	ANTHONY LINDSAY	$184.00	DAMAGED MOBILE PHONE - ANTHONY LINDSAY
35384	01-May-03	JOHN BUDROVICH & SIOBHAN MOORE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35385	01-May-03	ANTE & MARINA BARIC	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35386	01-May-03	JASON P & JILL L WAGSTAFF	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35387	01-May-03	SILVANIA ZITO	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35388	01-May-03	LORNA MARIE MOORE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35389	01-May-03	ROY WYATT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35390	01-May-03	ROBERT NICHOLLS	$189.75	RATE REFUND P/N 169531 - OVERPAID
35391	01-May-03	DAVID TAYLOR SOLICTORS TRUCT ACC	$695.60	RATE REFUND P/N 189959
35392	01-May-03	A T & W C HIGGINS	$222.16	RATE REFUND P/N 201579 - PAID TWICE
35393	01-May-03	K R & S COOPER	$151.08	RATE REFUND P/N 196793
35394	01-May-03	MULTI CULTURAL SERV CENTRE	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35395	01-May-03	NORTHSIDE OUTREACH GRP MS SOCIETY	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35396	01-May-03	ISHTAR UNITED SOCCER CLUB	$50.00	BOND REFUND
35397	01-May-03	NORTHERN DIST SOFTBALL CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND
35398	01-May-03	LANDSDALE JNR SOCCER CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND
35399	01-May-03	MARY GOODALL	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35400	01-May-03	EDDIE COE	$500.00	BOND REFUND
35401	01-May-03	DEBBIE ILIC	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35402	01-May-03	BRIAN UNDERWOOD	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35403	01-May-03	DANS-EZ STUDIO	$78.91	EXERCISE CLASSES - YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE
35404	01-May-03	MR R J SYMONS	$149.56	RATES REFUND P/N 192940 - PENSION REBATE
35405	01-May-03	MR P CLEMO & MS M ARROWSMITH	$142.62	RATES REFUND P/N 196174 - OVERPAYMENT
35406	01-May-03	VO SINH TRAN	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35407	01-May-03	ALLEN MOBILE PHONE SERVICES	$286.00	RECOVER LG HANDSFREE FROM VARIOUS VEHICLES
35408	01-May-03	ABONNEL PUMPWORKS ENGNG	$810.47	SERVICE YANCHEP LAGOON, WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE, QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PARK & GLOUCESTER LODGE
35409	01-May-03	BOUNCE AWAY	$170.00	SUPERVISED BOUNCER - SAFER CITIZENS COMMUNITY PROGRAM
35410	01-May-03	COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS	$52,258.87	ADVERTISING FOR FEBRUARY AND MARCH 2003
35411	01-May-03	CITY OF JOONDALUP	$439.71	OFF SITE STORAGE OF CORPORATE RECORDS
35412	01-May-03	DELL COMPUTERS PTY LTD	$681.78	COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FOR I.T. SERVICES
35413	01-May-03	EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD	$60.00	30 A3 POSTERS FOR MAYOR JON KELLY
35414	01-May-03	E-SPAN SOLUTIONS	$660.00	INTERNET CONNECTION FOR APRIL 2003
35415	01-May-03	FLEXIGLASS CANOPIES	$34.50	VENT BACKING PLATE FOR WORSHOP DEPOT
35416	01-May-03	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	$456.36	PHOTOCOPIER METER READING FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENT
35417	01-May-03	KLEENHEAT GAS PTY LTD	$1,033.07	DELIVERIES -GAS PROPANE 45KG CYLINDER VAPOUR FOR QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PARK
35418	01-May-03	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	$500.01	FLEET 98168 – INSURANCE EXCESS ON REPAIRS
35419	01-May-03	MAIN ROADS	$600.00	SEMINAR ON NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE-CYCLING ON 9APRIL03 – J DUFF, L CORBESKI, G RODGER, T QUINN, N RAINFORD, M BEST
35420	01-May-03	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	$210.00	ANIMAL DISPOSAL FOR RANGER SERVICES
35421	01-May-03	MOTORCHARGE LIMITED	$150.87	FUEL ISSUES FOR WN31352, WN31663 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
35422	01-May-03	MULTI VISION	$6,200.00	SUPPLY NON CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL TREATMENT TO PUBLIC FOOTPATHS, KERBS & PAVED AREAS WITHIN QUINNS ROCK
35423	01-May-03	PAX BOOKS	$310.77	WANNEROO LIBRARY PURCHASES
35424	01-May-03	THE PRINTING FACTORY	$815.70	BUSINESS CARDS FOR RANGERS
35425	01-May-03	PC AUTHORITY	$66.50	SUBSCRIPTION TO PC AUTHORITY – I.T. SERVICES
35426	01-May-03	SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY	$21.30	CREDIT PROCESSED IN ERROR ON CHQ 35273
35427	01-May-03	STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L	$68.16	STOCK ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE
35428	01-May-03	CADBURY SCHWEPPES	$338.37	VARIOUS SOFT DRINKS FOR AQUAMOTION
35429	01-May-03	STOPMASTER BRAKES	$292.60	BRAKE REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35430	01-May-03	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	$57,795.24	FUEL ISSUES AND CARDS FOR COW VEHICLES
35431	01-May-03	STILES & HICKS	$312.52	CUSTOMER CODE 60WANNCC
35432	01-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35433	01-May-03	TOTAL TORO	$1,781.55	MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE
35434	01-May-03	TREVORS CARPETS	$32,472.00	CARPETING AT GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
35435	01-May-03	WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$2,275.78	HIRE OF 70 WATER FILLED BARRIERS FOR HESTER AVENUE, CLARKSON
35436	01-May-03	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$188.45	MILK SUPPLY FOR CITY
35437	01-May-03	WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE	$610.50	VEHICLE TOWING SERVICES - ABANDONED VEHICLES
35438	01-May-03	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	$136.13	HOME CARE SERVICES
35439	01-May-03	WESTERNEX SUPPLY	$151.80	POLYWOVEN SACKS - DEPOT STORE STOCK
35440	01-May-03	AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS	$55.00	2001 CENSUS SOCIAL ATLAS SERIES PERTH - OFFICE OF CEO
35441	01-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$954.50	POSTAGE FOR CITY
35442	01-May-03	AUSTRALIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY	$125.00	FULL PAYMENT OF INVOICE 12642 AS CREDIT WAS TAKEN AFTER ORIGINAL INVOICE WAS DEDUCTED THE 125 DOLLARS - FIRST AID COURSE FOR 10 PEOPLE
35443	01-May-03	ACROD WA DIVISION	$16.50	PARKING PERMIT RENEWAL - MRS A TILSED
35444	01-May-03	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$49.75	PETTY CASH
35445	01-May-03	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY	$97,587.85	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION LEVY PAYMENT
35446	01-May-03	COURIER AUSTRALIA	$240.54	COURIER SERVICES FOR CITY
35447	01-May-03	CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$165.95	PETTY CASH
35448	01-May-03	CABCHARGE	$6.41	CABCHARGE SERVICES FOR AGED DAY CARE SERVICES
35449	01-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO MUNI FUND	$131.09	EXERCISE CLASSES - YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE
35450	01-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$1,113.03	TRANSFER PAYMENT OF RATES TO SUNDRY DEBTOR BALANCE DUE ON P/N 146576 RATES
35451	01-May-03	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	$156.00	EUTHANASIA OF 8 DOGS
35452	01-May-03	STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$64.80	PETTY CASH
35453	01-May-03	FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY	$870.00	LODGEMENT OF 29 INFRINGEMENT RECORDS WITH FINES ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY
35454	01-May-03	GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA	$60.50	GRAFFITI REMOVAL
35455	01-May-03	GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM P/CASH	$83.10	PETTY CASH
35456	01-May-03	HOME CHEF	$2,571.84	HOME CHEF DINNERS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES HACC CLIENTS
35457	01-May-03	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$4,827.27	HACC SERVICES SOUTH AND NORTH
35458	01-May-03	JUDITH HUGHES	$299.92	MARCH 2003 TRAVEL & CHILDCARE EXPENSE CLAIM
35459	01-May-03	INTEGRATED WORKFORCE LIMITED	$1,227.80	CASUAL LABOUR (RUNNER) FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES
35460	01-May-03	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	$22,103.40	MODIFY THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY DEPOT DOG POUND
35461	01-May-03	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	$2,507.76	DOORKNOCKERS FOR RANGER & SAFETY SERVICES
35462	01-May-03	MERCURY FIRE SAFETY	$6,785.79	SERVICE AND INSTALLATION OF FIRE EQUIPMENT
35463	01-May-03	OPTUS	$100.00	RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
35464	01-May-03	PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PETTY CASH	$466.40	PETTY CASH
35465	01-May-03	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$19.50	PETTY CASH
35466	01-May-03	ROADS 2000 PTY LTD	$10,105.48	LAY ASPHALT & GRAVEL TWO ROCKS & GAGE STREETS
35467	01-May-03	STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS	$103.95	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
35468	01-May-03	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$933.52	REPAIR DAMAGED TELSTRA PLANT AT CORNER LANDSDALE & SKEIT ROAD, LANDSDALE
35469	01-May-03	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$3,599.49	MOBILENET ACCOUNT
35470	01-May-03	TURF GRASS PLUS	$9,187.18	23X60L BINS FOR MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE (PLUS FREIGHT CHARGE FROM MELBOURNE)
35471	01-May-03	TAGGART BUSHLAND SERVICES	$728.20	SEED COLLECTION AND WEED CONTROL - MINDARIE AND BRIGHTON
35472	01-May-03	WANNEROO PLUMBING	$121.55	PLUMBING SERVICES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
35473	01-May-03	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	$63.33	ELECTRIC REPAIRS FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
35474	01-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$514.80	METER REPAIR FEE WESTGATE WAY, MARANGAROO AND BUTTERWORTH AVENUE, KOONDOOLA
35475	01-May-03	WESTERN POWER	$9,188.55	POWER SUPPLIES AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS
35476	01-May-03	WHELANS	$3,622.08	SURVEY FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND ROAD RESERVE HEPBURN AVENUE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS
35477	01-May-03	YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$33.70	PETTY CASH
35478	01-May-03	YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE P/CASH	$147.20	PETTY CASH
35479	06-May-03	JILL BOND	$3,300.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S OPEN AWARD - CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
35480	06-May-03	JILL BOND	$1,100.00	WINNER OF CITY’S PAINTING AWARD
35481	06-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$2,803.92	SUBDIVSION FEES FOR S & S FILIPPOU - RECEIPTED INTO RATES IN ERROR
35482	06-May-03	PAMELA HULSHOFF	$1,000.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S WORKS ON PAPER AWARD
35483	06-May-03	CARMEL WARNER	$1,000.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S THREE DIMENSIONAL WORKS AWARD
35484	06-May-03	JUDY ROGERS	$500.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S BEST RESIDENT AWARD
35485	06-May-03	MICHELLE SEDGMAN	$250.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S BEST SECONDARY STUDENT AWARD
35486	06-May-03	DAVID SCOTT	$250.00	WINNER OF THE CITY’S BEST TERTIARY STUDENT AWARD
35487	06-May-03	JENNY VERNE TAYLOR	$625.00	WORK COMPLETED - CURATING THE ART AWARDS
35488	06-May-03	CLARE PERKINS	$1,149.00	FIRST INSTALMENT FOR BANKSIA GROVE MURAL PROJECT
35489	08-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35490	08-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35491	08-May-03	ALAN BLENCOWE	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35492	08-May-03	FRANK CVITAN	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35493	08-May-03	DOROTHY NEWTON	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35494	08-May-03	SAM SALPIETRO	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35495	08-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35496	08-May-03	TRACEY ROBERTS	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35497	08-May-03	IINET TECHNOLOGIES	$400.00	ANNUAL CHARGE FOR EXPLORER SERVICE PERIOD 9/5/03-9/5/04 – I.T. SERVICES
35498	08-May-03	MARK PEARSON	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
35499	08-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$4,467.15	LEGAL FEES - ISSUE SUMMONS FOR RATES DEPARTMENT
35500	08-May-03	ENDEAVOUR THEATRE CO INC	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35501	08-May-03	MIRRABOOKA UNITED SOCCER CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND
35502	08-May-03	WANNEROO AMATEUR FOOTBALL CLUB	$300.00	BOND REFUND
35503	08-May-03	JOHN STEWART	$499.41	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL 2003
35504	08-May-03	ELIZABETH MARTINENGO	$85.75	OVERPAYMENT OF RATES
35505	08-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35506	08-May-03	PENNANT HOUSE FLAGS	$2,007.50	CITY OF WANNEROO FLAGS/ SCREEN SET UP FOR MARKETING DEPARTMENT
35507	08-May-03	EUROPEAN FOODS WHOLESALERS PTY LTD	$116.16	CATERING ITEMS FOR ELECTED MEMBERS
35508	08-May-03	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$27.90	LEGAL EXPENSES – RATES DEPARTMENT -
35509	08-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35510	08-May-03	MURIEL BURNABY	$30.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35511	08-May-03	SELWYN ANDERSON	$60.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35512	08-May-03	ROYAL LIFE SAVING SOCIETY AUSTRALIA	$22.00	GUIDELINES/SAFE POOL UPDATE FOR AQUAMOTION
35513	08-May-03	LAURA GREEN	$33.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35514	08-May-03	SYLVIA COUSINS	$36.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35515	08-May-03	GORDON SADLER	$15.00	COMMUNITY BUSES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35516	08-May-03	SHIRLEY CAMPBELL	$77.30	COMMUNITY BUSES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35517	08-May-03	HERITAGE OFFICER PETTY CASH	$84.90	PETTY CASH
35518	08-May-03	COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT	$156.45	PETTY CASH
35519	08-May-03	DOREEN LEIGH	$24.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35520	08-May-03	GARETH DIXON	$356.93	PURCHASE OF CORDLESS PHONE AND STOCK FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
35521	08-May-03	MARY BUTCHER	$36.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35522	08-May-03	DRU & LEANNE NICOLE PAMMENT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35523	08-May-03	GARRY W & JANICE L KIMBER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35524	08-May-03	SARAH-JAYNE & VICTOR A POWELL	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35525	08-May-03	GEORGE & CARRIEANNE SWEETIN-MOONEY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35526	08-May-03	ROBERT ANDREW ATKINSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35527	08-May-03	DAVID W VAN HEEK & HELEN C WELLS	$288.87	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35528	08-May-03	SIMON JOHN LANGTON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35529	08-May-03	PETER DUGGAN	$12.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35530	08-May-03	CAROLE TAYLOR	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35531	08-May-03	CAROLINE WRIGHT	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35532	08-May-03	RAYMOND HARDEY	$25.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35533	08-May-03	NATALIE JOSEPHSEN	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35534	08-May-03	YVONNE BOYLE	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35535	08-May-03	RHONDA BUTLER	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35536	08-May-03	DIANNE GARDNER	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35537	08-May-03	VINCENT FALZON	$12.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35538	08-May-03	ROBERT CAMPBELL	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35539	08-May-03	ROBERT MITCHELL	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35540	08-May-03	PAUL KEEBLE	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35541	08-May-03	MARGARET BODSWORTH	$68.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35542	08-May-03	JEAN WILLIAMS	$68.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35543	08-May-03	RONALD WILLIAMS	$68.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35544	08-May-03	PATRICIA ELLIS	$25.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35545	08-May-03	CAROLYN & G WILLIAMS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35546	08-May-03	CHANTEL & L ROSSELLI	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35547	08-May-03	2003 OFFICE PROFESSIONALS DAY BREAKFAST'	$294.00	2003 OFFICE PROFESSIONALS DAY BREAKFAST ON 24/04/03 ATTENDED BY R ZAGWOCKI, S BRUYN, R PEAKE, C HEWITT, C WILLIAMS, J FEW
35548	08-May-03	GLENDA BYRNE & M SPENCER	$300.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35549	08-May-03	MARK TAYLOR	$50.00	SPORT SPONSORSHIP - UNDER 18 HOCKEY CHAMPIONSHIPS
35550	08-May-03	ASHLEIGH FREEMAN	$50.00	SPORT SPONSORSHIP - NATIONAL CALLISTHENICS CHAMPIONSHIPS
35551	08-May-03	RON POWELL	$36.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35552	08-May-03	SHIRLEY POWELL	$36.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35553	08-May-03	ROBERT EAMES	$36.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35554	08-May-03	ANTIONETTE & RADOMIR KESIC	$135.14	RATES1235/03 T M HUNG - REFUND - OVERPAYMENT
35555	08-May-03	ASCOT SETTLEMENTS	$360.38	RATES REFUND - 19 IMARI RETREAT
35556	08-May-03	IAN R & MARIANNE Y TOZER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35557	08-May-03	IVAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM	$337.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35558	08-May-03	GARY & SARAH ANN DONALDSON	$320.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35559	08-May-03	ALAN M & ANNA L V TAYLOR	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35560	08-May-03	BERNARD E & MARGARET RUDD	$300.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35561	08-May-03	S DOHERTY-FORMAN & A FORMAN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35562	08-May-03	WILLIAM & MARILYN MURPHY	$296.50	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35563	08-May-03	ALLBEND ENGINEERING	$1,320.00	SUPPLY AND BENDING OF BIKE RAKES FOR OPERATIONS
35564	08-May-03	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$440.00	HIRE OF MACHINERY FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE FOR 4 DAYS
35565	08-May-03	KW INNS & K F PENNO	$5,670.01	REIMBURSMENT OF EXPENDITURE - QUINNS CARAVAN PARK CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FEES FOR APRIL 2003
35566	08-May-03	NUFORD WANNEROO	$75,146.25	2 X FORD BA FAIRMONT GHIA SEDAN 4.0L
35567	08-May-03	OFFICE OF STATE REVENUE	$142.60	STAMP DUTY ASSESSMENT FEE FOR WANNEROO DISTRICTS NETBALL ASSOC. - LEASE
35568	08-May-03	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$236.70	MILK SUPPLIES FOR CITY
35569	08-May-03	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$104.45	PETTY CASH
35570	08-May-03	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$87.75	PETTY CASH
35571	08-May-03	AVIS	$134.07	HIRE OF 12 SEATER BUS FOR NYOONGAH COMMUNITY PLAYGROUP OUTING
35572	08-May-03	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$48.10	PETTY CASH
35573	08-May-03	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	$807.69	STAFF SUPERANNUATION F/ENDING 25/04/03 - APPLICATION NUMBER A3606010501 -
35574	08-May-03	FARLEY CAMPBELL	$57.30	COMMUNITY BUSES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35575	08-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	$1,302.80	PAYROLL DEDUCTION F/ENDING 25/04/03
35576	08-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$346.88	RUDI STEFFENS TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL 2003 IN PAYMENT OF RATES
35577	08-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$8.80	REIMBURSEMENT OF CREDIT CARD CHARGES FOR SPECIAL WASTE COLLECTION
35578	08-May-03	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$184.25	PETTY CASH
35579	08-May-03	STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$212.80	PETTY CASH
35580	08-May-03	MOBILE LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$48.95	PETTY CASH
35581	08-May-03	PALASSIS ARCHITECTS	$6,853.00	PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR REFURBISHMENT OF GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM
35582	08-May-03	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$70.60	PETTY CASH
35583	08-May-03	RANGERS & SAFETY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$248.05	PETTY CASH
35584	08-May-03	BEATRIX RAUSCH	$199.00	PODIATRY CLINICS - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35585	08-May-03	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	$12,384.76	ELECTRICAL SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY
35586	08-May-03	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$80.25	PETTY CASH
35587	08-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$418.70	STANDPIPE CHARGES FOR OPERATIONS
35588	08-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$114.50	SERVICE DISCONNECTION FEE - ROUNDABOUT AT VARCOE ROAD
35589	08-May-03	W A LOCAL GOVT SUPERANNUATION	$225,731.42	SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTION - APRIL 2003
35590	08-May-03	WESTERN POWER	$104,104.25	POWER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY SITES INCLUDING STREET LIGHTS
35591	08-May-03	HAZEL WALKER	$35.00	DAY CARE CENTRES - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
35592	08-May-03	WANN LIBRARIES CENTRAL SVCS P/C	$111.55	PETTY CASH
35593	08-May-03	ZURICH CLIENT SERVICE	$235.38	STAFF SUPERANNUATION F/ENDING 25/04/03 - 02073765 VINCENT HUMPHRIES -
35594	09-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$5,841.50	LEGAL FEES SUMMONS - RATES DEPARTMENT
35595	13-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$1,583.15	LEGAL FEES ISSUE WARRANTS - RATES DEPARTMENT
35596	13-May-03	LINK TELECOMMUNICATIONS	$49.50	MESSAGE PAGING AND SERVICE FEE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES
35597	13-May-03	TARGET	$565.00	OFFICE DESK & CHAIR - ELECTED MEMBERS FURNITURE
35598	13-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$1,522.00	LEGAL FEES - WARRANT - RATES DEPARTMENT
35599	14-May-03	ROBERT TAYLOR	$91.66	KEY HOLDER -WANNEROO RECREATION AND TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER
35600	14-May-03	AARON'S FLORIST	$217.50	WREATHS FOR VARIOUS RSL ANZAC SERVICE FROM OFFICE OF THE MAYORS
35601	14-May-03	MINT SETTLEMENTS	$22.40	RATES REFUND P/N 183259 - OVERPAYMENT
35602	14-May-03	EA BOOKS	$177.35	BOOK ORDER - PROJECT MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
35603	14-May-03	MICHAEL HAYES	$75.00	KEY HOLDER - WANNEROO ROAD BOARD MUSEUM
35604	14-May-03	SPORTS TURF TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD	$863.50	WEED, SOIL AND WATER ANALYSIS FOR VARIOUS CITY PARKS
35605	14-May-03	UDIA	$55.00	FORUM 1/7/03 URBAN DEVELOPMENT - C JOHNSON
35606	14-May-03	ROMARK CONSULTING PTY LTD	$2,618.00	ROMARK MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1/1/02 TO 30/6/03 FOR STRATEGIC AND EXECUTIVE
35607	14-May-03	G K J F C	$100.00	BOND REFUND - DENNIS COOLEY PAVILION
35608	14-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$114.40	LEGAL FEES JOONDALUP COURT - WARRANTS FOR RATES DEPARTMENT
35609	14-May-03	STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	$26.40	BOOK FOR WANNEROO MOBILE LIBRARY
35610	14-May-03	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$34.85	LEGAL FEES 1527-2003 FOR RATES DEPARTMENT
35611	14-May-03	BUBBLEMANIA	$346.75	COMMUNITY EVENT WORKSHOP FOR 30 PEOPLE - SAFER CITIZENS COMMUNITY PROJECT
35612	14-May-03	EVAN MARTIN	$83.32	KEYHOLDER - HAINSWORTH, ALEXANDER HEIGHTS, JOHN MALONY AND KOONDOOLA
35613	14-May-03	CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS	$543.41	RATES REFUND - REVALUATION
35614	14-May-03	LADYBIRD'S PLANT HIRE	$85.80	RENTAL - INDOOR PLANTS FOR APRIL 2003
35615	14-May-03	LEE TAN	$41.66	KEY HOLDER - PERIDOT PARK AND BANKSIA GROVE ZONE
35616	14-May-03	LUZIA JOHNSTONE	$41.66	KEYHOLDER - CLARKSON YOUTH AND ANTHONY WARING PARK
35617	14-May-03	EVENTS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION	$145.00	LEGAL RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES SEMINAR 20/05/03 - DIANE TWEEDIE
35618	14-May-03	ABBEY BEACH RESORT	$194.00	ACCOMMODATION FOR 3/04/03 FOR S BRESNEHAN - RISING TO THE CHALLENGE SEMINAR
35619	14-May-03	JENNY GILBERT	$100.00	TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER, KOONDOOLA AND MONTROSE
35620	14-May-03	FIONA BENTLEY	$154.00	REIMBURSEMENT OF LGMA MEMBERSHIP
35621	14-May-03	A TOUCH OF CLASS WEDDING STATIONERY	$144.50	SEALS, CARDS & SILVER TRANSPARENTS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
35622	14-May-03	LYN VERGUNST	$91.66	KEY HOLDER - GUMBLOSSOM AND TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER
35623	14-May-03	DEANNE HETHERINGTON	$91.66	KEYHOLDER - GIRRAWHEEN, HUDSON PARK AND TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER
35624	14-May-03	JOE ARRIGO	$91.66	KEYHOLDER - WANNEROO SENIOR CITIZENS AND TENNIS BOOKING OFFICER - ELLIOTT ROAD
35625	14-May-03	STEVE BARBARICH	$41.66	KEYHOLDER - WARRADALE
35626	14-May-03	CORAL RAYNER	$41.66	KEY HOLDER - PHIL RENKIN
35627	14-May-03	WANNEROO YOUTH CENTRE PETTY CASH	$114.45	PETTY CASH
35628	14-May-03	HOMESWEST	$6,732.15	RATES REFUND - OVERPAYMENT
35629	14-May-03	MORNINGTON ADVENTURE CAMP	$1,767.40	ACCOMMODATION, CATERING AND ADVENTURE TRAINING FOR WANNEROO YOUTH CAMP
35630	14-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35631	14-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35632	14-May-03	DEBORAH & MATTHEW ROWSTON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35633	14-May-03	MAUREEN E & PAUL J MESSER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35634	14-May-03	LEE ANN & PAUL ROBERT WINNING	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35635	14-May-03	JENNIFER CAROL PARRIN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35636	14-May-03	KELLY L & MICHAEL G TURNER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35637	14-May-03	CORNELIS & MYRA BOLSENBROEK	$471.26	RATES REFUND - SUBDIVISION
35638	14-May-03	GIUSEPPE PINTAUDI	$552.70	RATES REFUND - REVALUATION
35639	14-May-03	CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAHS	$479.01	RATES REFUND - REVALUATION
35640	14-May-03	GRAHAM MCLEAN	$50.00	SPORT SPONSORSHIP - NATIONAL BLIND BOWLERS CHAMPIONSHIP
35641	14-May-03	MICHAEL FINNERTY	$300.00	BOND REFUND - WANNEROO COMMUNITY HALL
35642	14-May-03	WOODVALE JUNIOR HOCKEY CLUB	$50.00	BOND REFUND - KINGSWAY SPORTING COMPLEX
35643	14-May-03	MIKE KALPAKOFF	$300.00	BOND REFUND - WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE
35644	14-May-03	Mr & Mrs Tasovac	$657.93	RATES REFUND P/N 152084
35645	14-May-03	MS M SULLIVAN	$224.00	RATES REFUND P/N 136422 - PENSION REBATE
35646	14-May-03	MR & MRS BATES	$131.34	RATES REFUND PN 176357 - PENSION REBATE
35647	14-May-03	MR & MRS KEMP	$295.42	RATES REFUND P/N 177492
35648	14-May-03	HAZEL THURBRON	$72.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35649	14-May-03	ROSALIND HARRIS	$36.00	GOLD PROGRAM REFUND
35650	14-May-03	BRADLEY ROBERTS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35651	14-May-03	RODNEY C EXETER & P REID	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35652	14-May-03	KENNETH M & KERRY A WALLIS	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35653	14-May-03	MR & MRS FERNANDEZ	$300.00	BOND REFUND BANKSIA ROOM HIRE
35654	14-May-03	COLIN H JOHNSON & SUSAN W JOHNSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35655	14-May-03	JARRAD LYALL NORMAN-PARKER	$220.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35656	14-May-03	DAMON JUSTIN PARK	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35657	14-May-03	LORRICE J BOCK & MICHAEL A F BOCK	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35658	14-May-03	KIMBERLEY J O'MALLEY & L A O'MALLEY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35659	14-May-03	ROBERTA STABLER	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35660	14-May-03	ALISA REDDALL	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35661	14-May-03	ANN FREEMAN	$37.50	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35662	14-May-03	BEN WESTON	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35663	14-May-03	THOMAS FRENCH	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35664	14-May-03	DANIELLE MAGUIRE	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35665	14-May-03	TROY JAMIESON	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35666	14-May-03	WAYNE DRAGE	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
35667	14-May-03	WASTE MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENT	$208.60	SUBSCRIPTION FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT & ENVIRO MAGAZINE
35668	14-May-03	GIUSEPPE ROCCA	$110.00	RATES REFUND P/N 147151 - OVERPAYMENT
35669	14-May-03	MR & MRS ALZAWAIDEH	$342.36	PENSION REBATE P/N 195711
35670	14-May-03	G PHOENIX	$78.36	PENSION REBATE P/N 194644
35671	14-May-03	MR & MRS AUMORD	$138.12	PENSION REBATE P/N 170816
35672	14-May-03	P DYER	$255.87	PENSION REBATE P/N193583
35673	14-May-03	Ms M GREEN	$245.06	PENSION REBATE P/N 181696
35674	14-May-03	C TIERNEY	$133.27	PENSION REBATE P/N 184571
35675	14-May-03	R E ARNOLD	$263.07	PENSION REBATE P/N 135783
35676	14-May-03	J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD	$187.00	GUN GREASE K29 CARTRIDGE FOR STORES/DEPOT
35677	14-May-03	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS P/L	$2,524.50	MOSS DESIGN CONTRACT - CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR SKEIT ROAD
35678	14-May-03	BADGE CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD	$396,000.00	CARRY OUT ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY FACILITY - $110,000 CARRY OUT ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE - $286,000
35679	14-May-03	BELYSSA	$300.00	FLAMES OF ARABY & DESERT FIRE PERFORMANCE FOR TWILIGHT CARNIVAL AT ABBEVILLE PARK
35680	14-May-03	COASTAL SERVICES	$1,985.50	MAINTENANCE AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES FOR BUILDING SERVICES
35681	14-May-03	CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD	$322.10	VARIOUS STATIONERY ITEMS FOR RECORDS SERVICES
35682	14-May-03	CARRAMAR EVERGREEN GOLF CLUB	$100.00	DONATION TO SUPPORT SENIORS GOLF TOURNAMENT
35683	14-May-03	DBS FENCING	$1,921.70	REMOVE & LOCATE EXISTING SECURITY FENCING EVANDALE & HEPBURN
35684	14-May-03	DRIVE IN ELECTRICS	$723.45	VEHICLE REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35685	14-May-03	DEPT OF INDUSTRY & RESOURCES	$14.50	RENEWAL OF LICENSE TO STORE DANGEROUS GOODS - AQUAMOTION
35686	14-May-03	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	$100.03	STOCK FOR DEPOT STORE
35687	14-May-03	FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$48.18	MONTHLY COPY CHARGES FOR APPROVAL SERVICES
35688	14-May-03	GELDENS PTY LTD	$120.14	VOLUNTEER FIRE SERVICE POLO AND TROUSERS FOR JEFF SMITH
35689	14-May-03	JR & A HERSEY	$57.42	ROAD MARKING PAINT FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
35690	14-May-03	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	$185.90	PHOTOCOPIER METER READING FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
35691	14-May-03	KNIGHT & SONS	$309.50	DOG FOOD FOR ANIMAL CARE CENTRE - RANGER SERVICES
35692	14-May-03	KW INNS & K F PENNO	$119.25	REIMBURSEMENT EFTPOS COMMISSION FOR APRIL 2003 - QUINNS ROCK CARAVAN PARK
35693	14-May-03	LINK TELECOMMUNICATIONS	$197.30	SMS LINK COMMUNICATION CHARGES - FIRE SERVICE (RANGERS)
35694	14-May-03	MIKE GEARY SIGNS	$993.41	ALTER HESTER VALLEY RETREAT ROAD SIGNS
35695	14-May-03	NOVUS WINDSCREEN REPAIRS	$291.50	WINDSCREEN REPAIRS FOR PLANT NO. 98504
35696	14-May-03	NORTHERN DISTRICTS PEST CONTROL	$71.50	REMOVAL OF BEES - 39/41 QUARKHAM STREET, WANNEROO
35697	14-May-03	PARK MOTOR BODY BUILDERS	$1,551.00	SUPPLY & FIT NEW OVERTAKING SIGNS ON TRAILER FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35698	14-May-03	PRESTIGE ALARMS	$4,600.75	MAINTENANCE OF ALARM SYSTEMS AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES
35699	14-May-03	THE PRINTING FACTORY	$108.76	BUSINESS CARDS - GEOF WHYTE & JENNIFER PLATE
35700	14-May-03	ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS	$1,434.80	FILLING SAND - MARMION AVENUE, BRIGHTON
35701	14-May-03	A & J SALAMONE	$446.60	FILLING SAND - BURBRIDGE, ELLIOTT ROAD AND KARIMBA STREET
35702	14-May-03	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	$295.80	STATIONERY FOR I.T. SERVICES
35703	14-May-03	SUN CITY PUBLISHING	$56.00	FIRE EXTENSION ADVERTISEMENT - RANGER SERVICES
35704	14-May-03	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	$4,664.69	FUEL ISSUES FOR VARIOUS VEHICLES
35705	14-May-03	SAI GLOBAL LIMITED	$1,100.00	ONE YEAR LICENCE FEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING & FLEET MAINTENANCE
35706	14-May-03	TORO AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$57.95	SPARE MOWER PARTS FOR DEPOT STORE
35707	14-May-03	TELETRONICS	$2,250.01	SUPPLY & INSTALL GUARD SAFETY TELEPHONE BANKSIA GROVE & JENOLAN COMMUNITY CENTRE
35708	14-May-03	TOLL TRANSPORT PTY LTD	$518.06	COURIER SERVICE
35709	14-May-03	WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE	$286.00	FABRICATE 1 COVER GUARD AND STEEL DOOR FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35710	14-May-03	WANNEROO MITSUBISHI	$110.01	VEHICLE SERVICES TO WN31892 FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35711	14-May-03	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	$6,090.15	LEGAL EXPENSES FOR CORPORATE SERVICES (RAAFA & HARBOURSIDE VILLAGES)
35712	14-May-03	WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE	$55.00	REMOVAL OF VEHICLE - FLYNN DRIVE, NEERABUP
35713	14-May-03	W A LIMESTONE CO	$32,905.32	LIMESTONE AND BITUMEN MIX SUPPLIES FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
35714	14-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TURF INDUSTRIES	$38,364.80	MAINTENANCE WORK AT MARANGAROO/CARRAMAR GOLF COURSES MARCH 2003
35715	14-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$2,750.13	POSTAGE CHARGES FOR RATES SERVICES
35716	14-May-03	ALINTA GAS	$5,985.85	GAS SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES
35717	14-May-03	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$44.30	PETTY CASH
35718	14-May-03	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$108.80	PETTY CASH
35719	14-May-03	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
35720	14-May-03	ART SUPPORT PTY LTD	$836.00	STAINLESS STEEL HANGING ASSEMBLIES FOR THE COMMUNITY ART GALLERY
35721	14-May-03	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	$807.69	STAFF SUPERANNUATION F/E 09/05/03 - APPLICATION A3606010501 -
35722	14-May-03	BUCKINGHAM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$47.90	PETTY CASH
35723	14-May-03	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY	$61,095.09	BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION LEVY PAYMENT
35724	14-May-03	ALAN BLENCOWE	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE-MAY2003
35725	14-May-03	CAPE DEMOLITION	$36.00	REPAIRS TO FERRARA PARK TOILETS
35726	14-May-03	CLEAN SWEEP	$308.00	SWEEPER - BURRIDGE KOONDOOLA/FRANKLIN WANNEROO 15/04/03
35727	14-May-03	CABCHARGE	$6.07	LIQUIDATED DAMAGES & SERVICE FEE (INTEREST ON LATE PAYMENTS) PAID BY FINANCE
35728	14-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	$1,232.80	PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS F/E 09/05/03 - RATES
35729	14-May-03	FRANK CVITAN	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE-MAY 2003
35730	14-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$500.00	DOROTHY NEWTON - MONTHLY ALLOWANCE PAID TO HER RATES
35731	14-May-03	CARRAMAR RESOUCES INDUSTRIES	$197.89	WASHED WHITE SAND FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT
35732	14-May-03	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$355.90	PETTY CASH
35733	14-May-03	DUNCAN CROSBIE GOLF WA PTY LTD	$23,164.31	COMMISSION ON FEES COLLECTED FOR APRIL 2003 – MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE
35734	14-May-03	DUNCAN CROSBIE GOLF PTY LTD	$23,809.16	COMMISSION ON FEES COLLECTED FOR APRIL 2003 – CARRAMAR GOLF COURSE
35735	14-May-03	EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	$480.37	EXCESS KMS CALCULATION ON WN072
35736	14-May-03	GOVERNMENT ENTITIES MARKETING ASSOCIATION	$55.00	SEMINAR - LEADING INNOVATION WITHIN GOVERNMENT AND NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS - HAZEL SMALLWOOD
35737	14-May-03	HOMESWEST - EAST PERTH	$6,609.38	RATES REFUND - VARIOUS PROPERTIES
35738	14-May-03	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$4,593.63	HACC SERVICES SOUTH AND NORTH
35739	14-May-03	LEISURE & LIBRARY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$130.73	PETTY CASH
35740	14-May-03	MESSAGES ON HOLD	$173.25	MOH PROGRAMMING 3 MONTHS RENTAL 30/12/02-30/03/03
35741	14-May-03	MOUNTCASTLE PTY LTD	$725.73	16 MURCHISON RIVER FF NAVY HATS FOR SECURITY PERSONNEL
35742	14-May-03	MERCURY FIRE SAFETY	$227.15	INSPECTION OF WANNEROO DEPOT
35743	14-May-03	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$11.00	COURIER FOR STORES/DEPOT
35744	14-May-03	NON-ORGANIC DISPOSALS	$1,940.40	DISPOSAL OF RUBBLE
35745	14-May-03	NORMAN DENNIS	$41.66	KEYHOLDER, JENOLAN WAY
35746	14-May-03	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$67.45	PETTY CASH
35747	14-May-03	SAM SALPIETRO	$1,125.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE - MAY 2003
35748	14-May-03	TECHNICAL OPERATIONS PETTY CASH	$336.00	PETTY CASH
35749	14-May-03	TANDY ELECTRONICS	$991.82	DVD PLAYER/CALLER ID C/LESS/MIC BLK/PRINTER/S FOR ALEXANDER HEIGHTS AGED DAY CARE
35750	14-May-03	WANNEROO PLUMBING	$4,684.54	PLUMBING SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS
35751	14-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$1,826.00	SEWERAGE MANHOLE FEE - BURBRIDGE AVENUE
35752	14-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$895.05	WATER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS CITY SITES
35753	14-May-03	WESTERN POWER	$38,843.00	POWER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY SITES
35754	14-May-03	ZURICH CLIENT SERVICE	$235.38	F/E 09/05/03 PLAN NO 02073765 - V HUMPHRIES
35755	15-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$133.55	LEGAL FEES - WARRANTS - RATES DEPARTMENT
35756	15-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$104.00	DOMESTIC ASSISTANT FUNDS PAID INTO RATES IN ERROR
35757	16-May-03	TRACEY ROBERTS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE MAY 2003
35758	16-May-03	STONEWALL CONSTRUCTION	$4,100.00	REFUND OF AMENDMENT NO 32 - AMENDMENT ADVERTISING OF TIMBERTOP NURSERY
35759	16-May-03	PHASE 1 AUDIO	$2,160.00	AUDIO EQUIPMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
35760	16-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$2,352.15	LEGAL WARRANTS - RATES DEPARTMENT
35761	19-May-03	JOONDALUP COURT	$165.00	LODGEMENT OF PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - LEGAL FEE RATES DEPARTMENT
35762	21-May-03	CLARKSON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL	$200.00	CLARINET TRIO PERFORMANCE AT ART AWARDS OPENING 6/5/03
35763	21-May-03	UDIA	$77.00	UDIA SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT FORUM 1/07/03 – PHIL THOMPSON
35764	21-May-03	QUINNS CENTRE PHARMACY	$9.05	RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE - MEDICATION
35765	21-May-03	YANCHEP PHARMACY	$160.60	RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE - MEDICATION
35766	21-May-03	ABORIGINAL PLAYGROUP CASH FLOAT	$100.00	PETTY CASH
35767	21-May-03	MINDARIE QUINNS SURF LIFE SAVING CLUB	$300.00	BOND REFUND - GUMBLOSSOM ACTIVITY 3, 4 - 10 MAY 2003
35768	21-May-03	LANDSDALE CRICKET CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND - DENNIS COOLEY FUNCTION ROOM
35769	21-May-03	KINGSWAY CHRISTIAN CRICKET CLUB	$100.00	BOND REFUND - WOODVALE CRAFT ROOM
35770	21-May-03	CLARE PERKINS	$1,377.80	SECOND INSTALLMENT -BANKSIA GROVE MURAL PROJECT
35771	21-May-03	MERVYN HARDING	$33.00	REIMBURSEMENT OF BUILDING PLANS - 37 MARADU CR, WANNEROO
35772	21-May-03	KENNETH FOX	$100.00	REIMBURSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION -LOT 1870 LYNNBURN PASS, CARRAMAR
35773	21-May-03	NIBIL NAMMOUR	$300.00	BOND REFUND - FACILITY HIRE AT ADDISON PARK
35774	21-May-03	LESLIE LINDEBLOOM	$50.00	REFUND FOR BATHERS DISCOLOURED FROM HIGH CHLORINE
35775	21-May-03	DOREEN J & RAYMOND D MORRELL	$240.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35776	21-May-03	PATRICK A V & WENDY A MCNALLY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35777	21-May-03	KAROLY & KAROLYNE HEDER	$106.83	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35778	21-May-03	JOYCE A & THOMAS SMITH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35779	21-May-03	MAXINE A & CLIFFORD LYNTON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35780	21-May-03	D T NGUYEN	$85.75	RATES REFUND P/N 125529
35781	21-May-03	MR & MRS PAPALIA	$89.90	RATES REFUND P/N 183448
35782	21-May-03	MR & MRS JAWORSKI	$237.85	PENSION REBATE P/N 173885
35783	21-May-03	MR & MRS O & K PAJER	$117.33	RATES REFUND P/N 196447
35784	21-May-03	MR & MRS MCMILLAN	$45.32	PENSION REBATE P/N 192092
35785	21-May-03	JANE JOAN REANEY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35786	21-May-03	NAN ARANA HEWITT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35787	21-May-03	SUSANNA HAWKES	$11.00	ART AWARD ENTRY REFUND
35788	21-May-03	CAROL ANNE BRETT	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35789	21-May-03	A H A & K C REEDER	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35790	21-May-03	A A KENYON & S M PAYNE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35791	21-May-03	E R & F J D'ARACHY	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
35792	21-May-03	AUSTRALASIAN PERFORMING ASSOC	$1,052.67	APRA/AMCOS LICENCES - 2003 - AQUAMOTION
35793	21-May-03	ANTHONY BEARD	$660.00	PROFESSIONAL FEES - FACILITATION HOME BASED BUSINESS WORKSHOP
35794	21-May-03	AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT	$275.00	MEMBERSHIP FEES 2003-2004 - GEOF WHYTE
35795	21-May-03	BLACK PEARL MODELLING AGENCY	$550.00	MODELLING WORKSHOP FOR CHICZ BIZ TWO ROCKS AND CLARKSON
35796	21-May-03	GLAZEWELL P/L	$3,934.70	WINDOW REPAIRS AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS
35797	21-May-03	HOUSING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION	$561.00	MEMBERSHIP HIA - CLEMENT WILLIAMS
35798	21-May-03	JARAM PRODUCTS PTY LTD	$33.70	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35799	21-May-03	PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE CO	$1,141.61	COPYRIGHT SERVICES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
35800	21-May-03	SANDS & MCDOUGALL OFFICE PRODUCT	$18,857.41	STATIONERY PURCHASES FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2003 AND DECEMBER 2002
35801	21-May-03	SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD	$97,723.74	EASIFLEET SHELL CARD
35802	21-May-03	S BODE	$825.00	RESEARCH CONDUCTED FOR CITY: SMEs AND E-BUSINESS
35803	21-May-03	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$233.90	MILK SUPPLIES FOR CITY
35804	21-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$1,216.93	MAIL FEES FOR RECORDS, ECONOMIC D MARTINUS AND FINANCE
35805	21-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$8,667.42	MAIL PREPERATION FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 03
35806	21-May-03	ALINTA GAS	$118.15	GAS SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
35807	21-May-03	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$113.50	PETTY CASH ALEXANDER HEIGTS ADULTS DAY CENTRE
35808	21-May-03	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$79.85	PETTY CASH
35809	21-May-03	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$50.00	PETTY CASH
35810	21-May-03	CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$185.35	PETTY CASH
35811	21-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$800.00	TO PROVIDE MEALS, FOOD, DRINKS, COVER ENTRANCE FEES & MISC FOR CARERS RETREAT - AGED AND DISABILITY SERVICES
35812	21-May-03	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$400.26	PETTY CASH
35813	21-May-03	STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$48.05	PETTY CASH
35814	21-May-03	GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$178.35	PETTY CASH
35815	21-May-03	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$59.15	PETTY CASH
35816	21-May-03	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$3,432.60	TELSTRA A/C VARIOUS
35817	21-May-03	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	$10,161.45	ELECTRICAL SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATION WITHIN CITY
35818	21-May-03	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$134.65	PETTY CASH
35819	21-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$238.25	METERED FIRE HYDRANT STANDPIPE HIRE
35820	21-May-03	WESTERN POWER	$6,550.30	POWER SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS CITY SITES 8 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
35821	21-May-03	WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING	$414.00	REPLY PAID ENVELOPES - COMMUNITY SERVICES
35822	28-May-03	A & J SALAMONE	$236.50	VARIOUS SAND PRODUCTS FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
35823	28-May-03	A & L CARPENTRY	$67.50	THERMOMETER FOR SAUNA - AQUAMOTION
35824	28-May-03	A CLASS LINEMARKING SERVICE	$951.50	LINEMARKING AT VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY
35825	28-May-03	A TEAM PRINTING PTY LTD	$1,210.00	120 X REQUISITION PURCHASE BOOKS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
35826	28-May-03	ACROD WA DIVISION	$80.00	INCLUSIVE RECREATION WORKSHOP - N HARRIS AND R LEWIN
35827	28-May-03	ACTION EVENTS	$1,034.00	VENUE JOHN MALONEY PARK MARANGAROO EGGFEST GLADIATOR DUEL AND HORIZONTAL BUNGEE
35828	28-May-03	ADASOUND	$1,630.64	REPAIRS TO SOUND EQUIPMENT - AQUAMOTION
35829	28-May-03	ADFORM	$220.00	SUPPLY & FIT RED REFLECTIVE LABELS TO EMERGENCY SERVICE HELMETS
35830	28-May-03	ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT	$17,325.03	CONTROLLERS, SIGNS & CONES TO WORKSITE ERRINA AVENUE AND FRANKLIN ROAD
35831	28-May-03	AG WEST PLANT LABORATORIES	$544.02	SEED TESTING FOR PARKS & GARDENS
35832	28-May-03	AGENT SALES & SERVICES PTY LTD	$196.08	POOL CHEMICALS FOR AQUAMOTION
35833	28-May-03	AGPARTS WAREHOUSE	$282.92	FORTRON BRAKE CLEANER - DEPOT STORE STOCK
35834	28-May-03	AIBS WA CHAPTER	$1,622.50	REGISTRATION FEES FOR CONFERENCE AUTH SAM NEALE
35835	28-May-03	AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD	$185.21	VARIOUS CYLINDERS AND HIRE CHARGES
35836	28-May-03	ALBOX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$47.50	ACID FREE LABELS - LIBRARY SERVICES RESTORATION WORK
35837	28-May-03	ALIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION	$69.00	MERCHANDISE FOR LIBRARIES
35838	28-May-03	ALINE BRICK PAVING	$3,322.00	BRICKPAVING AT BARRIDGE STREET, KOONDOOLA
35839	28-May-03	ALL RUBBER SURFACES	$56.50	FGAS SPRINGS FOR PLANT NO. 97690
35840	28-May-03	ALLEN MOBILE PHONE SERVICES	$209.00	INSTALL HANDS FREE KIT TO WN176 & WN31817
35841	28-May-03	ALLIED FORKLIFTS	$132.00	REPAIR INSTRUCTION ON HOW TO USE BRAKES PLANT NO. 98804
35842	28-May-03	ALLIGHT PTY LTD	$171.63	HIRE AND FUEL FOR 10K VA GENERATOR SET FOR 3 EVENTS - CARAMAR EGGSTRAVAGANZA, OCTOPUS'S GARDEN AND MARANGAROO EGGFEST
35843	28-May-03	ALLMARK & ASSOCIATES	$180.95	SELF INKING STAMPS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE &LIBRARY SERVICES
35844	28-May-03	ALLTECH INDUSTRIES AUSTRALIA	$750.00	SENTINEL PAGERS PROGRAMMED TO WANNEROO PAGING GROUP
35845	28-May-03	AMBIT INDUSTRIES	$302.50	SUPPLY & FIT NEW GATE TO ELLIOT ROAD TENNIS COURTS
35846	28-May-03	AMCON SOLUTIONS PTY LTD	$1,188.00	CONSULTANCY FOR ORACLE DATABASE MAINTENANCE – I.T. SERVICES
35847	28-May-03	ANITECH	$874.27	METER READING FOR INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT HP INK CARTRIDGES FOR HP PLOTTER - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
35848	28-May-03	APPLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$328.29	APPLE MAC COMPUTER RENTAL – APRIL 2003 FOR MARKETING SERVICES
35849	28-May-03	ARB 4X4 ACCESSORIES	$159.90	VEHICLE REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35850	28-May-03	ARBOR VITAE LANDSCAPE	$5,225.00	PROVISION OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR GIRRAWHEEN COMMUNITY FACILITY REVIEW
35851	28-May-03	ATKINS CARLYLE LTD	$184.25	TOOL PURCHASE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35852	28-May-03	AUSSIE OUTBACK SUPPLIES P/L	$121.00	KIT BAGS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES PICKED UP BY MIKE TERACI
35853	28-May-03	AUST AIRCONDITIONING SVCS P/L	$39,639.56 $30,890.20	AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES TOVARIOUS CITY FACILITIES CARRYOUT WORKS AT TWO ROCKS LIBRARY TO REPLACE AIR-CONDITIONING UNIT
35854	28-May-03	AUST INST OF MANAGEMENT	$132.50	TIME MANAGEMENT COURSE - J ZURBITO
35855	28-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD	$600.00	CONDUCT CHERRY PICKER TRAINING & ASSESSMENT FOR PARKS EMPLOYEES - 4/04/03
35856	28-May-03	AUTO BRAKE SERVICE	$3,252.04	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35857	28-May-03	AUTO CONTROL DOORS	$146.30	REPAIR DOOR - WANNEROO COMMUNITY CENTRE
35858	28-May-03	B C J PLASTICS PRODUCTS PTY LTD	$415.80	DOMES & EGGCRATES FOR AQUAMOTION
35859	28-May-03	B S D CONSULTANTS	$1,848.00	ROMAN SOFTWARE TRAINING FOR DATA COLLECTION - BENNY CHANG
35860	28-May-03	B WESTON	$60.00	CLEANING OF HALL
35861	28-May-03	BAILEYS FERTILISERS	$3,632.75	VARIOUS CHEMICALS FOR PARKS & GARDENS
35862	28-May-03	BAPTIST CARE	$605.63	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO CACP CLIENTS
35863	28-May-03	BEAR E SENSUALS	$924.00	30 LEARN TO SWIM SHIRTS FOR AQUAMOTION
35864	28-May-03	BEAUMARIS FAMILY PRACTICE	$247.50	VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTER MEDICALS - B KYNASTON, A URQUHART AND G TAYLOR
35865	28-May-03	BEAUREPAIRES	$23,591.97	TYRE FITTING SERVICES FOR CITY VEHICLES
35866	28-May-03	BELAIR SMASH REPAIRS	$2,675.69	VEHICLE REPAIRS TO WN31643 WN31872 & WN31872
35867	28-May-03	BELRIDGE BUS CHARTER	$88.00	BUS HIRE FOR CHICZ BITZ EXCURSION CLARKSON TO SIZZLER BELDON
35868	28-May-03	BELYSSA	$350.00	ORIENTAL DANCERS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
35869	28-May-03	BGC BLOKPAVE	$5,482.93	PAVERS DELIVERED TO VARIOUS ENGINEERING PROJECT SITES
35870	28-May-03	BOC GASES	$19.80	DRY ICE PELLETS FOR HEALTH SERVICES
35871	28-May-03	BOFFINS BOOKS	$269.10	ORACLE 9i DBA CERTIFICATION BOXED – I.T.SERVICES
35872	28-May-03	BOOK CITY OCEAN KEYS	$29.31	BOOKS FOR MOBILE LIBRARY
35873	28-May-03	BORAL CONCRETE	$1,296.55	CEMENT DELIVERIES TO VARIOUS CITY PROJECTS
35874	28-May-03	BOWMAN BISHAW GORHAM	$12,265.00	YANCHEP, TWO ROCKS AND MINDARIE FORESHORE VEGETATION SURVEYS
35875	28-May-03	BOYA MARKET GARDEN EQUIPMENT	$1,650.00	HIRE OF BLADERUNNER FINISHING MOWER FOR 1 MONTH
35876	28-May-03	BROWNBUILT METALUX INDUSTRIES	$754.41	SHELVES & CABINET
35877	28-May-03	BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS P/L	$2,739.00	DUNDEBAR ROAD UPGRADE
35878	28-May-03	BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$40.07	CAP RADIATOR AIRBAG 1KG
35879	28-May-03	BUBBLEMANIA	$346.75	MARANGAROO EGGFEST COMMUNITY EVENT
35880	28-May-03	BUCKLEYS WASTE DISPOSAL	$380.00	P/OUT SEPTIC TANK 1204 WANNEROO ROAD, ASHBY
35881	28-May-03	BUDGET PORTABLES	$1,841.65	CHEMICAL TOILET/ LUNCHROOM/SECURITY CONTAINERS FOR VARIOUS SITES
35882	28-May-03	BUILDERS REGISTRATION BOARD	$36,676.50	BUILDING DISPUTE LEVY FEBRUARY 2003 TO APRIL 2003
35883	28-May-03	BULLIVANTS PTY LTD	$115.50	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35884	28-May-03	BUNNINGS LIMITED	$2,669.12	SUPPLIES FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT PURCHASE OF GIFT VOUCHERS FOR RANGERS & PATROL OFFICERS PURCHASE OF 45 GIFT VOUCHERS FOR OPERATIONS
35885	28-May-03	BURGTEC AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD	$213.76	OFFICE CHAIR - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY SERVICES
35886	28-May-03	BYWEST PTY LTD	$1,221.03	MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE
35887	28-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35888	28-May-03	C C H AUSTRALIA LIMITED	$1,805.01	MANAGE PAYROLL ADMIN AND MANAGE OCC HEALTH AND SAFETY SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR CORPORATE RESOURCES
35889	28-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35890	28-May-03	CABCHARGE	$921.48	CABCHARGE SERVICES - VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
35891	28-May-03	CAMTEC ELECTRONICS (WA)PTY LTD	$195.00	REPAIR OF DAT WALKMAN FOR APPROVAL SERVICES
35892	28-May-03	CARRAMAR RESOUCES INDUSTRIES	$103.12	FILL SAND, YELLOW SAND, CLEAN YELLOW FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECTS
35893	28-May-03	CARROLL & RICHARDSON	$186.00	AUSTRALIAN FLAG PAPER HANDWAVER FOR CITIZENSHIP CEREMONIES
35894	28-May-03	CASEWEST PTY LTD	$3,403.75	VEHICLE REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35895	28-May-03	CASTLE TOOLS TYROLIT PTY LTD	$306.90	DIAMOND COMBINATION BLADE FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
35896	28-May-03	CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD	$3,769.70	STATIONERY ITEMS FOR RECORDS
35897	28-May-03	CENTAMAN SYSTEMS PTY LTD	$275.00	CALLOUT FOR CENTAMAN SYSTEM – I.T. SERVICES
35898	28-May-03	CENTENNIAL PARK	$50.00	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY SERVICE, THE SOCIAL BENEFIT OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
35899	28-May-03	CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA	$361.90	VEHICLE BATTERIES FOR DEPOT STORE & FLEET MAINTENANCE
35900	28-May-03	CHEF EXCEL PTY LTD	$5,755.20	CATERING FOR VARIOUS COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
35901	28-May-03	CHICKEN TREAT WANNEROO	$87.50	FIRE FIGHTER TRAINING COURSE
35902	28-May-03	CHRIS WILLIAMSON	$137.50	DECORATIVE FEATHER BANNER FOR MEDIEVAL MADNESS
35903	28-May-03	CITY OF JOONDALUP	$5,923.19	LIBRARY SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT-MARCH 2003
35904	28-May-03	CLEAN SWEEP	$11,660.00	SWEEPING OF VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY
35905	28-May-03	COATES	$5,978.11 $4,536.68	HIRE OF VARIOUS MACHINERY FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES HIRE OF VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD FOR HESTER AVE PROJECT
35906	28-May-03	COCA COLA AMATIL	$155.23	REFRESHMENTS FOR ELECTED MEMBERS
35907	28-May-03	COLES SUPERMARKETS AUST P/L	$84.63	FOOD RESOURCES FOR ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CARE CENTRE
35908	28-May-03	COLLINS CRAFT & SCHOOL SUPPLIES	$41.25	CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR WANNEROO LIBRARY
35909	28-May-03	COMMUNIQUE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (WANGARA)	$4,320.00	MOBILE PHONES AND HAND FREE CAR KITS FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
35910	28-May-03	COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES	$1,350.00	COMMUNITY VISIONING: BUILDING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE ATTENDEES: G PRUS, T MARTELL, C WILLIAMS, D WOO, G FISHER, C MEYERS, S SPINKS & M WEBSTER
35911	28-May-03	COMTEK PTY LTD	$132.00	PC WITH SUSPECT DISK PROBLEM – I.T. SERVICES
35912	28-May-03	CONSOLIDATED BEARING COMPANY	$110.36	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35913	28-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
35914	28-May-03	COVENTRYS	$2,528.76	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE STOCK
35915	28-May-03	COWLEY SHEETMETAL PTY LTD	$671.00	REPAIR AND SUPPORT DUCTING AT RECYCLING DEPOT
35916	28-May-03	CSL LIMITED	$23.52	FLUVAX 0.5ML PACK (FLU VACCINATIONS) FOR CITY STAFF
35917	28-May-03	CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD	$2,945.37	LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET CHARGES
35918	28-May-03	CUTTING EDGES PTY LTD	$704.13	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35919	28-May-03	CYNDAN INDUST MAINTENANCE CHEMICALS	$642.40	CHEMICALS FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE
35920	28-May-03	D & M LAUNDRY SERVICE	$372.19	LAUNDRY SERVICE FOR ELECTED MEMBERS
35921	28-May-03	DAVID R LISTER	$240.00	POOL LIFE GUARD REQUALIFICATION
35922	28-May-03	DBS FENCING	$720.50	REPLACE AND REPAIRS TO VARIOUS FENCING FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
35923	28-May-03	DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD	$10,694.09	VARIOUS SIGNS AND FIXTURES FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
35924	28-May-03	DELL COMPUTERS PTY LTD	$19,709.80	COMPUTERS FOR I.T. SERVICES
35925	28-May-03	DEPARTMENT OF TREASURE & FINANCE	$263.60	CONTRACT 115399 MERCHANT SERVICES - JANUARY TO MARCH 2003
35926	28-May-03	DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE	$67.05	VEHICLE SEARCHES MARCH 2003 - RANGER SERVICES
35927	28-May-03	DEPT OF CALM	$82.50	LEASE 2111/100 GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM
35928	28-May-03	DEPT OF CONSERVATION & LAND	$14,369.36	HEAVY DUTY MACHINERY HIRE FOR FIRE AT GIBBS ROAD 13/01/03
35929	28-May-03	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$37.00	LAND SEARCHES FOR RATES DEPARTMENT AND SURVEYORS
35930	28-May-03	DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION	$715.00	LAND VALUATIONS/SEARCHES FOR RATES DEPT. AND SURVEYORS
35931	28-May-03	DEWSONS MERRIWA	$84.72	FOOD FOR FAMILY DAY CARE PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
35932	28-May-03	DIAMOND LOCK & KEY	$387.50	PADLOCKS AND KEY BLANKS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
35933	28-May-03	DICK SMITH ELECTRONICS	$265.98	SUPPLY HAND HELD TWO WAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION & DRAINAGE CREW
35934	28-May-03	DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS	$82.50	REPAIRS TO TAIT FIRE SERVICE RADIO
35935	28-May-03	DMS ENERGY	$349.00	INSTALL FROSTED CRYSTAL FILM TO DOORS AT WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE
35936	28-May-03	DOME COFFEES AUST PTY LTD	$140.00	COFFEE FOR ELECTED MEMBERS
35937	28-May-03	DR C T WONG	$1,377.50	IMMUNISATION CLINICS FOR APRIL 2003
35938	28-May-03	DRIVE IN ELECTRICS	$1,790.75	VARIOUS REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35939	28-May-03	DWIGHT HOLDINGS PTY LTD	$478.50	AJUST TELECOM PIT CNR TRICHET RD & FRANKLIN ROAD SERVICE LOCATIONS - ARITI AVENUE AND FRANKLIN ROAD
35940	28-May-03	E R S AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$486.20	PARTS WASHER SERVICE AND SPARE PARTS - FLEET MAINTENANCE
35941	28-May-03	E-SPAN SOLUTIONS	$8,679.44	ADDITIONAL DOWNLOADS MARCH 2003 ANNUAL FEE FOR MANAGED SERVICES CLARKSON LINK
35942	28-May-03	EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT	$40,613.07	LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET
35943	28-May-03	EASTERN PRESS PTY LTD	$1,024.00	VEHICLE IMPOUND BOOKS AND DOG REGISTRATION FORMS FOR RANGER SERVICES
35944	28-May-03	EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL	$136.50	EUTHANASIA - 7 DOGS
35945	28-May-03	ELECTRIC HIRE	$36.39	3PH POLE FOR QUINNS COASTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
35946	28-May-03	ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD	$1,127.42	RETIC ITEMS FOR PARKS & GARDENS
35947	28-May-03	ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES	$1,020.49	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AT WANNEROO ADMIN CENTRE
35948	28-May-03	EXECUTIVE PLANT HIRE	$3,135.00	PLANT HIRE FOR HESTER AVENUE CLARKSON PROJECT
35949	28-May-03	EXPRESS CHEMICALS	$517.00	POOL CHEMICALS FOR AQUAMOTION
35950	28-May-03	FAL FOOD SERVICES	$1,519.72	CATERING SUPPLIES FOR STAFF, ELECTED MEMBERS & MARKETING
35951	28-May-03	FORCE EQUIPMENT SERVICE AND HIRE	$9,185.00	CONSTRUCTION OF 2 GROYNES AND SAND RENOURISHMENT FOR COASTAL PROTECTION WORKS
35952	28-May-03	FORCORP PTY LTD	$737.00	REPAIR STROBE LIGHTS TO TRUCKS 96717 AND 96706
35953	28-May-03	FORPARK AUSTRALIA	$176.00	SUPPLY ALUMINUM SEAT TOP - FOR SCARBOROUGH TENNIS MONTROSE PARK
35954	28-May-03	FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE KINGSWAY	$66.00	PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL FOR L WATSON
35955	28-May-03	FRICTION CONTROL	$35.20	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35956	28-May-03	FUCHS LUBRICANTS (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD	$8,875.88	VEHICLE OIL SUPPLIES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE & DEPOT STORE
35957	28-May-03	G P R TRUCK SALES & SERVICE	$104.50	VEHICLE SERVICE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35958	28-May-03	GALAXY CURTAINS	$2,171.40	SUPPLY & INSTALL CURTAINS - BANKSIA GROVE COMMUNITY CENTRE
35959	28-May-03	GALVINS PLUMBING PLUS	$15.07	DEWALT WOOD SAW BLADE FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE
35960	28-May-03	GAZAL	$177.54	SHIRTS PINPOINT OXFORD - FLEET MAINTENANCE UNIFORM PURCHASE
35961	28-May-03	GELDENS PTY LTD	$462.00	UNIFORMS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES
35962	28-May-03	GEOFF NINNES, FONG AND PARTNERS	$1,430.00	SPA TESTING - AQUAMOTION
35963	28-May-03	GEOFF'S TREE SERVICE	$3,993.00	TREE REMOVAL AND PRUNING AT VARIOUS SITES
35964	28-May-03	GERRY GIBBS CAMERA HOUSE	$2,651.00	CANON DM-MVX21
35965	28-May-03	GLENFORDS TOOL CENTRE	$71.90	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
35966	28-May-03	GLOBE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$4,396.70	SCOTTS SPORTSMASTER FERTILISER FOR VARIOUS PARKS
35967	28-May-03	GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA	$489.50	GRAFFITI REMOVAL
35968	28-May-03	GRAND TOYOTA DAIHATSU	$418.55	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35969	28-May-03	GREEN & GOLD HIAB SERVICES	$1,870.00	VARIOUS WORKS FOR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECTS
35970	28-May-03	GYMCARE	$153.45	TREADMILL ROLLER WHEEL - AQUAMOTION
35971	28-May-03	HAYS PERSONNEL SERVICES	$6,544.87	CASUAL LABOUR FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
35972	28-May-03	HEALTH ON THE MOVE	$1,332.51	CONDUCT MANUAL HANDLING TRAINING, WORK PLACE ASSESSMENTS & RISK AUDITS FEBRUARY & MARCH 2003
35973	28-May-03	HEAVY AUTOMATICS	$855.53	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35974	28-May-03	HIGHLINE BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS	$8,152.10	CONSTRUCT FIRE & EMERGENCY VEHICLE COMPOUND
35975	28-May-03	HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY (AUST) P/L	$2,969.41	VEHICLE FILTERS AND SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORES
35976	28-May-03	HOME CHEF	$4,148.22	PROVISION OF MEALS FOR HACC CLIENTS
35977	28-May-03	HOMECARE PURSUITS	$26,506.51	SERVICES FOR CACP AND HACC CLIENTS, ABORIGINAL PROGRAM AND HOME CARE SERVICES
35978	28-May-03	HOOKED ON HESSIAN	$995.50	WORKSHOP SQWA TAPESTRY SATURDAY MORNING FOR AGED DAY CARE PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
35979	28-May-03	HUGALL & HOILE MALAGA	$135.52	RETIC ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
35980	28-May-03	HYDRAMET PTY LTD	$511.23	PROBE-PH UIT STRANTROL CONTROLLER
35981	28-May-03	HYSTER WEST	$158.47	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35982	28-May-03	IAIN SUMMERLIN	$192.50	AUDIOLOGICAL ASSESS - P WATTS
35983	28-May-03	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	$1,306.66	PHOTOCOPIER METER READINGS FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENT
35984	28-May-03	INTEGRATED WORKFORCE LIMITED	$28,812.67	CASUAL LABOUR FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
35985	28-May-03	INTELLIGENT SPAS PTE LTD	$215.00	PURCHASE COPY OF AUSTRALIAN SPA INDUSTRY SURVEY REPORT 2002 - LIBRARY & LEISURE SERVICES
35986	28-May-03	INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING	$1,303.50	NEW GUTTERS - WANNEROO SHOWGROUNDS REPAIRS TO GAZEBO TALARA PARK EXTEND LIMESTONE WALL TO MEET METAL POST AT YANCHEP LIFESAVING
35987	28-May-03	ITT FLYGT LIMITED	$49,401.00	SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF PACKAGE PUMP STATION TO COX CR QUINNS ROCKS FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS
35988	28-May-03	J B PRECISE ENGINEERING	$2,183.50	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35989	28-May-03	J BLACKWOOD & SON LTD	$317.81	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35990	28-May-03	JACKSONS DRAWING SUPPLIES P/L	$67.12	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
35991	28-May-03	JAMES CHRISTOU & PARTNERS	$3,025.00	PROVISION OF MASTER PLANNING SERVICES FOR PART LOT 211 CNR QUINNS ROAD & OCEAN DRIVE
35992	28-May-03	JASON SIGN MAKERS	$1,199.00	SUPPLY AND FIT REFLECTIVE DECALS TO EMERGENCY SERVICES HELMETS
35993	28-May-03	JB HI FI GROUP PTY LTD	$901.58	VARIOUS CD'S FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
35994	28-May-03	JCA WESTSIDE	$99.00	REPAIRS TO REAR CAMERA ON PLANT NO 96719
35995	28-May-03	JIM DAVIES & ASSOC PTY LTD	$1,980.00	LAKE JOONDALUP WATER QUALITY MONITORING
35996	28-May-03	JMAC INDUSTRIES	$132.00	CLEANING RAGS FOR DEPOT STORES
35997	28-May-03	JOONDALUP CANVAS WORKS	$214.50	SAND TARP FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
35998	28-May-03	JOONDALUP INDUSTRIAL HEALTH	$330.00	PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL W/O AUDIO TEST FOR FIRE FIGHTERS
35999	28-May-03	JOSEPH DAHDAH & COMPANY	$176.00	STAFF UNIFORMS FOR SECURITY SERVICES
36000	28-May-03	JR & A HERSEY	$123.09	ROAD MARKING PAINT FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36001	28-May-03	K & F CONCRETE	$4,180.00	RURAL CROSSOVER - 333 BADGERUP ROAD RURAL CROSSOVER - 86 THE FAIRWAYS
36002	28-May-03	KATRIMAS CURTAINS	$90.00	2 WOODEN POLES FOR HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTRE
36003	28-May-03	KERBING WEST	$30,602.39	KERBING AT VARIOUS SITES
36004	28-May-03	KLEENHEAT GAS PTY LTD	$547.64	GAS CYLINDERS - QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PARK
36005	28-May-03	KOTT GUNNING	$1,922.25	PROFESSIONAL CHARGES - QUINNS BEACH CAFE/ RESTAURANT
36006	28-May-03	L & T VENABLES	$17.68	SPARE PARTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES
36007	28-May-03	LAMB PRINTERS PTY LTD	$99.00	A3 POSTER DIGITAL PRINT - COMMUNITY SERVICES
36008	28-May-03	LANDMARK ENGINEERING & DESIGN	$8,140.00	INSTALLATION OF ENVIRO TOILETS AT THE SPOT YANCHEP TWO ROCKS ROAD
36009	28-May-03	LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT	$2,576.56	LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF APRIL AT VARIOUS ROUNDABOUTS
36010	28-May-03	LASSO MEDIA PTY LTD	$462.00	MAD SCIENTIST 19/04/03 - MARANGAROO EGGFEST
36011	28-May-03	LAWN DOCTOR	$9,014.50	FERTILISE MINTARO & BELLHAVEN PARKS SCARIFYING OF PLAYING FIELD (BLACKMORE) VERTI MOW FERRARA PARK & EDGAR GRIFFITHS PARKS
36012	28-May-03	LIFTRITE TOYOTA	$37.27	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36013	28-May-03	LINCOLNE SCOTT	$1,980.00	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CONSULTANCY SERVICES ON VARIOUS PROJECTS
36014	28-May-03	LINFOX ARMAGUARD	$641.05	CASH COLLECTIONS
36015	28-May-03	LO-GO APPOINTMENTS	$8,818.50	DOORKNOCKERS FOR RANGER SERVICES
36016	28-May-03	LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES ASSOC (WA)	$38.00	ONE COPY OF "WEAVING TAPESTRIES" FOR YOUTH SERVICES
36017	28-May-03	LULLFITZ	$68.75	NATIVE SEEDLING TUBES FOR CITIZENSHIP CEREMONY
36018	28-May-03	M M ELECTRICAL MERCHANDISING	$162.46	SAN TRUCK BIN LIFT SWITCHES FOR REPAIRS - FLEET MAINTENANCE
36019	28-May-03	MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENG CO P/LTD	$7,326.43	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36020	28-May-03	MACHFORCE PTY LTD	$654.50	ANNUAL SERVICE & SAFETY INSPECTION ON CRANE PLANT 96385
36021	28-May-03	MAJOR MOTORS	$5,162.20	VARIOUS PARTS PURCHASED FOR FLEET REPAIRS
36022	28-May-03	MAYDAY EARTHMOVING	$24,528.35	PLANT HIRE FOR VARIOUS ENGINEERING PROJECTS
36023	28-May-03	MCLEOD & CO	$2,221.35	PROFESSIONAL FEES FOR VARIOUS DISPUTES
36024	28-May-03	MEDIA MONITORS WA PTY LTD	$227.20	6PR TRANSCRIPTS - GIRALT/ HEPBURN INTERSECTION FOR MARKETING SERVICES
36025	28-May-03	MEMO COMMUNICATIONS	$820.61	INSTALL ANTENNAS AND REPAIRS TO VEHICLE TWO-WAY RADIOS RELOCATION OF COUNCIL BASE SET AT JOONDALUP POLICE STATION
36026	28-May-03	METAL ARTWORK CREATIONS	$122.39	NAME BADGES FOR VARIOUS EMPLOYEES
36027	28-May-03	METROCOUNT	$412.00	VARIOUS SUPPLIES FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
36028	28-May-03	MEY EQUIPMENT	$782.97	PARTS AND REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36029	28-May-03	MIDLAND BRICK COMPANY PTY LTD	$1,737.95	ROADPAVERS DELIVERED TO PINJAR ROAD, NEERABUP
36030	28-May-03	MIDWAY FORD	$78,481.07	FORD BA FUTURA SEDAN WN32036 2 X FORD BA FALCON AL STYLESIDE UTILITY
36031	28-May-03	MIKE GEARY SIGNS	$247.02	SIGN FOR QUINNS DOG BEACH AND MAGNETIC NUMBERS FOR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
36032	28-May-03	MINDARIE BUS CHARTER	$320.00	HIRE BUS FOR GOLD PROGRAM
36033	28-May-03	MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL	$110,627.07	BULK COMMERICAL, GENERAL WASTE AND SMALL ANIMAL DISPOSAL
36034	28-May-03	MINI PICKERS	$313.50	INSTALL BANNERS ON WANNEROO ROAD FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
36035	28-May-03	MIRACLE REC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$83.60	BRONZE BUSHES FOR SWING BRACKETS - PARKS MAINTENANCE
36036	28-May-03	MOBILE SHRED ONSITE	$38.50	MS 240LT BINS ON-SITE SHRED- HALWEST WAY, ALEXANDER HEIGHTS
36037	28-May-03	MODERN TEACHING AIDS PTY LTD	$91.47	YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE
36038	28-May-03	MONTY'S AUTOCOLOUR	$3,547.04	AEROSOL PAINT FOR URBAN ART PROJECT
36039	28-May-03	MORLEY MOWER CENTRE	$1,207.20	SUPPLIES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36040	28-May-03	MOSSY'S MINI EXCAVATIONS	$28,435.00	SUPPLY AND INSTALL RETIC PIPE - HESTER AVENUE, CLARKSON
36041	28-May-03	MPL OCC & ENV SOLUTIONS	$847.00	CONDUCT TENDER DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO PUTTING DOCUMENT OUT TO TENDER
36042	28-May-03	MUE HECKLER	$105.40	PODIATRY CLINICS - VOLUNTARY SERVICE
36043	28-May-03	MUSTANG PRINT & COPY	$422.30	LAMINATION AND COLOUR COPIES SERVICE FOR FIRE SERVICE
36044	28-May-03	MYSTERY SHOPPING INTERNATIONAL	$290.40	MYSTERY SHOPPING TELEPHONE CALLS & LETTER/E-MAILS
36045	28-May-03	NAZZARIS HINO PARTS	$135.90	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36046	28-May-03	NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS	$22.00	COURIER SERVICE - BUILDING & FLEET MAINTENANCE
36047	28-May-03	NETWORK FOODS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$103.82	ASSORTED TOFFEES FOR ELECTED MEMBERS
36048	28-May-03	NEWCREST SECURITY	$1,020.00	ROTATOR BEACONS FOR RANGER SERVICES
36049	28-May-03	NEWMART	$200.00	PANTRY ITEMS FOR QUINNS DAY CENTRE
36050	28-May-03	NINDETHANA SEED SERVICE	$2,351.20	VARIOUS SEEDS PURCHASED - PARKS MAINTENANCE
36051	28-May-03	NORTHERN DISTRICTS PEST CONTROL	$462.00	PEST TREATMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
36052	28-May-03	NOVUS WINDSCREEN REPAIRS	$528.00	WINDSCREEN REPAIRS FOR VARIOUS PLANT
36053	28-May-03	O S A GROUP	$14,451.25	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR EMPLOYEE OPINION & ATTITUDE SURVEY - JANUARY -APRIL 2003 ($12,100) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT INDEPENDENT OBSERVATION AND COACHING SERVICES FOR EMPLOYEE ($2,351.25)
36054	28-May-03	OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL PTY LTD	$990.00	PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE WITH THE CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION PROGRAM
36055	28-May-03	ONESTEEL LTD	$344.17	STEEL FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36056	28-May-03	OPTUS	$42.98	ENVIRONMENT WASTE SERVICES - SERVICE CHARGE
36057	28-May-03	ORANGE	$579.56	PAGING SERVICE - VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS
36058	28-May-03	P & M AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT	$71.50	SAFETY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION & SERVICE ON WORKSHOP HOISTS
36059	28-May-03	P R AGENCIES INDUSTRIAL PTY LTD	$1,148.07	CAMERA FILM PHOTOGRAPHIC POLAROID - DEPOT STORE STOCK
36060	28-May-03	PABX SERVICE GROUP	$660.00	PABX REPROGRAMMING AND CALLOUT FEES
36061	28-May-03	PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL	$1,425.49	OUTSIDE EMPLOYEES WORK UNIFORMS
36062	28-May-03	PALACE HOMES CONSTRUCTION	$101,215.11	CONSTRUCTION OF ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE MARANGAROO & CARRAMAR GOLF COURSES
36063	28-May-03	PALASSIS ARCHITECTS	$726.00	ADDITIONAL FEE FOR STAFF AREA GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM
36064	28-May-03	PARINS	$4,800.45	VEHICLE REPAIRS AS PER ESTIMATES AND INSURANCE EXCESSES
36065	28-May-03	PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY LTD	$3,062.95	PROFILING OF 25MM 2MT STRIP OF ASPHALT AT ERRINA AVENUE 1/04/03 - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
36066	28-May-03	PEDAL 'N' PADDLE ADVENTURES	$480.00	SWAN VALLEY WINERY TOUR – FOR GOLD PROGRAM 9/04/03
36067	28-May-03	PERTH HOME CARE	$680.00	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
36068	28-May-03	PERTH STRIPES & SIGNS	$4,042.50	RANGER SERVICES SIGNS FOR NEW VEHICLES
36069	28-May-03	PERTH ZOO	$280.00	PERTH ZOO VISIT 27/04/03 FOR SENIORS
36070	28-May-03	PETER WOOD PTY LTD	$10,031.73	SUPPLY & INSTALL VARIOUS FENCING
36071	28-May-03	PHIL SNAPES ACCIDENT	$704.97	REPAIRS TO HOLDEN COMMODORE WN31701
36072	28-May-03	PHOENIX MOTORS OF WANNEROO	$29,296.95	HOLDEN COMMODORE WN32043
36073	28-May-03	PLE COMPUTERS	$171.20	MODEMS FOR I.T. SERVICES
36074	28-May-03	POUSTIE CONSULTING PTY LTD	$6,336.00	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR AUTOMATED LIBRARY SYSTEM REVIEW
36075	28-May-03	PRESTIGE ALARMS	$3,873.30	ALARM SERVICES AND SITE VISITS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
36076	28-May-03	PRODUCTIVE PLASTICS	$66.00	CHECK & REMOVE BROKEN SKYLIGHT DIFFUSERS, PICK UP NEW DIFFUSERS AT GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE
36077	28-May-03	PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL	$715.00	ACCOMMODATION FOR MEMBERS OF GANGAJANG - SUMMER CONCERTS
36078	28-May-03	PROTECTOR ALSAFE	$5,402.69	VARIOUS SAFETY ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36079	28-May-03	QUALCON LABORATORIES	$955.90	ASPHALT/LIMESTONE AND ESL TESTING AT VARIOUS SITES
36080	28-May-03	QUICKCOPY AUDIO SERVICES	$118.14	DOUBLE SLIMLINE CD CASES WITH TRAY (STATIONERY) FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
36081	28-May-03	R & P ENGINEERING PTY LTD	$5,181.00	VARIOUS ROAD WORKS FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS
36082	28-May-03	R RUSSELL-BROWN	$247.50	TAI CHI LESSONS TERM 1 2003 - YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE
36083	28-May-03	RAECO	$519.88	STATIONERY FOR LIBRARIES
36084	28-May-03	RAINWEST ROOFINGS PTY LTD	$836.00	REPAIRS TO GUTTERS FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE
36085	28-May-03	RCG PTY LTD	$2,326.84	LANDFILL, FILL SAND AND CLEANFILL FOR ENGINEERING
36086	28-May-03	READYMIX HOLDINGS PTY LTD	$5,461.23	CONCRETE PRODUCTS DELIVERED TO VARIOUS PROJECT SITES
36087	28-May-03	RED HOT PARCEL TAXI	$70.40	FLEET COURIER SERVICE
36088	28-May-03	REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES	$36,580.45	CONTRACT CLEANING - CITY FACILITIES
36089	28-May-03	RELLIM BOOKSELLERS PTY LTD	$87.28	EXPLORING EXPECT PUBLICATION FOR I.T. SERVICES
36090	28-May-03	RETRAVISION	$489.00	TV VIDEO CASS-COMBINATION TWIN SPEAKER - LIBRARY SERVICES
36091	28-May-03	REXEL AUSTRALIA	$92.84	10AMP HIRE FUSE - PARKS DEPARTMENT
36092	28-May-03	ROADS 2000 PTY LTD	$117,828.92	SUPPLY & LAY ASPHALT AT VARIOUS ENGINEERING PROJECTS
36093	28-May-03	ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS	$66.07	FILLING SAND FOR ENGINEERING
36094	28-May-03	RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD	$671.00	SUPPLY & LAY 60M WINTERGREEN TURF
36095	28-May-03	SALMAT	$609.40	LETTERBOX DISTRIBUTION MARANGAROO AND CARRAMAR EGG FESTS
36096	28-May-03	SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY	$124.16	MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR HEALTH SERVICES
36097	28-May-03	SCANIA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$330.89	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36098	28-May-03	SCOTTS TRIMMING SERVICE	$55.00	REPAIR 2 PAIRS OF CHAPS - BUILDING & FLEET MAINTENANCE
36099	28-May-03	SHAWMAC PTY LTD	$880.00	HEPBURN ROAD DESIGN-INTERIM ACCOUNT NO. 5 DESIGN WORKS COMPLETED FOR MARCH
36100	28-May-03	SHENTON ENTERPRISES PTY LTD	$1,248.26	PLANT & EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - AQUAMOTION
36101	28-May-03	SHORT TERM VIDEO HIRE	$147.50	DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA HIRE (1WEEK) FOR CLARKSON EXTREME SKATE VIDEO - YOUTH SERVICES
36102	28-May-03	SIGN A RAMA	$529.63	SIGNS FOR SAFER CITIZENS COMMUNITY EVENTS
36103	28-May-03	SIZZLER BELDON	$436.80	CHICZ BIZ EXCURSION FOR WANNEROO GIRLS
36104	28-May-03	SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD	$3,575.00	PROVISION OF PODIATRY SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
36105	28-May-03	SKILLED COMMUNICATIONS	$10,921.28	RELOCATE MANHOLE HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD, CLARKSON
36106	28-May-03	SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT	$8,029.08	PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36107	28-May-03	SOLVER PAINTS	$234.59	VARIOUS BRIGHT GLOS & TINTED SOLVENT PAINTS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
36108	28-May-03	SPECIALISED FORCE PTY LTD	$75.20	PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36109	28-May-03	SPOTLIGHT STORES PTY LTD	$1,014.51	CRAFT ITEMS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
36110	28-May-03	ST ANDREWS SUPPORT SERVICES	$532.13	ST ANDREWS SUPPORT SERVICES DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE
36111	28-May-03	ST JOHN AMBULANCE OF AUSTRALIA	$135.00	FIRST AID COVER FOR 19/04/03 EASTER CELEBRATIONS
36112	28-May-03	STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS	$77,451.00	LOADER, WATER TRUCK, WATER TRUCK, TIPPER, BOBCAT AND COMPACTOR HIRE FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS
36113	28-May-03	STANDARDS AUSTRALIA	$427.34	PUBLIC SPAS HANDLING FOR AQUAMOTION AUDITING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS - STAFF TRAINING FOR OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT
36114	28-May-03	STANHOPE HOME NURSING SVCS	$103.95	PROVISION OF SERVICES TO HACC CLIENTS
36115	28-May-03	STATE LAW PUBLISHER	$104.50	COMMUNITY SERVICES CHILD CARE REGULATIONS 198
36116	28-May-03	STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	$5,171.65	BOOK PURCHASES FOR ALL LIBRARIES AND ELECTRONIC DATA BASE CHARGE
36117	28-May-03	STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES P/L	$6,743.94	CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36118	28-May-03	STEWART & HEATON CLOTHING CO PTY LTD	$231.30	UNIFORMS FOR FIRES SERVICES, QUINNS ROCKS
36119	28-May-03	STICK-UP POSTER DISTRIBUTION	$275.00	MOTOR ACE - YOUTH CONCERT
36120	28-May-03	STOPMASTER BRAKES	$2,259.40	BRAKE REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36121	28-May-03	SUNCITY NEWSAGENCY	$27.17	NEWSPAPERS TO YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS
36122	28-May-03	SUNNY BRUSHWARE SUPPLIES	$429.00	REFILL TWO SETS GUTTER BROOMS - FLEET MAINTENANCE
36123	28-May-03	SWAN CERAMICS	$127.60	SOAP HOLDERS FOR GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE
36124	28-May-03	SWAN TAXIS CO-OPERATIVE LTD	$138.38	TAXI FOR CACP CLIENTS AND TRANSPORT FOR ALEX. HEIGHTS DAY CARE CLIENTS
36125	28-May-03	TACTILE INDICATORS WA PTY LTD	$5,791.50	TACTILE TREATMENT TO HESTON/BARTYON STREETS
36126	28-May-03	TALDARA	$319.00	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36127	28-May-03	TAUBMANS	$282.77	PAINT SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI CAMPAIGN
36128	28-May-03	THE PRINTING FACTORY	$1,269.62	MEMBERSHIP PADS FOR AQUAMOTION
				STATEMENTS FOR FINANCE SERVICES
36129	28-May-03	TOLL TRANSPORT PTY LTD	$47.18	COURIER SERVICE - TECHNICAL OPERATIONS
36130	28-May-03	TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS	$7,144.62	IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS & GARDENS AND DEPOT STORE STOCK
36131	28-May-03	TOTAL TORO	$2,321.60	MOWER SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT STORE
36132	28-May-03	TRADE N PRINT	$3,414.40	YOUTH SERVICES MEMBERSHIP CARDS POSTERS FULL COLOUR WITH OUTDOOR INKS - COMMUNITY SERVICES STREET BANNERS FOR ART AWARDS - COMMUNITY SERVICES
36133	28-May-03	TREVORS CARPETS	$187.00	FURNITURE FLOOR PREPARATION AND LABOUR - LIBRARY SERVICES PROJECT
36134	28-May-03	TWIST ENGINEERING PTY LTD	$214.50	RE-DESIGN BORE DISCHARGE ASSEMBLY - PARKS DEPARTMENT
36135	28-May-03	UNIVERSAL ENGINEERS SUPPLIES	$22.69	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36136	28-May-03	VALUER GENERAL'S OFFICE	$3,069.43	VALUATION FEES FOR RATES DEPARTMENT
36137	28-May-03	VIBRA INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION AUST	$59.29	VEHICLE FILTER FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36138	28-May-03	VOLUME DESIGN GROUP CONSULTANTS	$550.00	FLOW AND PRESSURE TESTS - HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE PROJECT
36139	28-May-03	W A CUTTING SERVICES	$1,340.13	RUBBISH TRUCK SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36140	28-May-03	W A HINO SALES & SERVICE	$281.24	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET
36141	28-May-03	W A LIMESTONE CO	$21,798.22	LIMESTONE PRODUCTS FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS
36142	28-May-03	W A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC.	$891.00	COUNCILLORS MANUAL UPDATES
36143	28-May-03	W T PARTNERSHIP AUST PTY LTD	$7,700.00	SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE NEW CLARKSON LIBRARY
36144	28-May-03	WA PAINT CITY	$543.05	PAINT SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI CAMPAIGN AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
36145	28-May-03	WACKER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$112.86	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36146	28-May-03	WANGARA STATIONERS	$26.70	LAMINATING FOR OPERATIONS
36147	28-May-03	WANNEROO AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY	$874.69	SPARE PARTS AND REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36148	28-May-03	WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE	$5,516.50	REPAIRS AT VARIOUS FACILITIES FABRICATE 4 ONLY ADJUSTABLE HANDLES ON NEW HOSE REELS
36149	28-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
36150	28-May-03	WANNEROO HARDWARE	$5,448.36	TOOL PURCHASES
36151	28-May-03	WANNEROO MOTORCYCLES	$22.50	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36152	28-May-03	CANCELLED	$0.00
36153	28-May-03	WANNEROO PLUMBING	$11,119.56	PLUMBING SERVICES AT VARIOUS SITES
36154	28-May-03	WANNEROO SES UNIT	$170.00	SAFER CITIZENS OCTOPUS GARDEN YANCHEP
36155	28-May-03	WANNEROO TAVERN	$86.05	FOOD & BEVERAGES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
36156	28-May-03	WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE	$1,028.50	TOWING OF ABANDONED VEHICLES FOR RANGER SERVICES
36157	28-May-03	WARWICK BUS & COACH COMPANY	$143.00	BUS FOR ABORIGINAL PLAYGROUP OUTING
36158	28-May-03	WATTLEUP TRACTORS	$153.05	VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET
36159	28-May-03	WATTS & WOODHOUSE	$5,850.35	LEGAL EXPENSES FOR CORPORATE SERVICES
36160	28-May-03	WELLINGTON SURPLUS STORES	$153.48	ITEMS FOR MUSEUMS AND RANGER SERVICES
36161	28-May-03	WENDY ROGERS	$1,496.00	VALUATION FEES FOR CURRENT MARKET VALUE 170 ARTWORKS
36162	28-May-03	WESFARMERS C S B P	$508.20	POOL CHEMICALS FOR AQUAMOTION
36163	28-May-03	WEST COAST GYMNASTS	$110.00	DRINK STALL - MARANGAROO EGGFEST AT JOHN MALONEY PARK
36164	28-May-03	WESTCARE INDUSTRIES	$802.56	STAFF UNIFORMS FOR OUTSIDE WORKERS
36165	28-May-03	WESTFUEL	$1,233.67	ZOOM 25 UNMARKED - DEPOT STORE STOCK
36166	28-May-03	WESTON REMARKING SERVICES	$3,019.50	REMARKING SERVICES ON CASTELLON DRIVE, ERRINA ROAD, KARIMBA AND HESTER AVENUE FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECTS
36167	28-May-03	WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD	$8,982.60	PLANT HIRE FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS - HESTER AVENUE
36168	28-May-03	WESTSIDE CONCRETE CONTRACTORS	$15,374.70	CEMENT DELIVERIES FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS - HESTER AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NORTHUMBERLAND, ERRINA DRIVE AND CRICKET WICKETS AT VARIOUS PARKS
36169	28-May-03	WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES PTY LTD	$1,615.63	PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC CLIENTS
36170	28-May-03	WHITFORD CABINETS	$242.00	5 COMPUTER KEY BOARD STANDS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK
36171	28-May-03	WOOLRIDGES	$58.95	BOOK PURCHASES FOR WANNEROO LIBRARY
36172	28-May-03	WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING	$633.00	MAGNET FOR BOW RUNS - LIBRARY SERVICES PRINTING OF YOUTH SERVICES TEMPLATE
36173	28-May-03	WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS	$2,759.90	SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE BUSHRANGER PACIFIC HELMET WHITE - RANGER SERVICES
36174	28-May-03	ZETTA FLORENCE PTY LTD	$321.09	SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
36175	28-May-03	ZIPFORM	$262.09	INTERIM RATE NOTICE PRINTING
36176	23-May-03	C A PEARSON	$251.81	TWO BRIEFCASES FOR CR PEARSON & CR ROBERTS - REIMBERSMENT
36177	26-May-03	E-SPAN SOLUTIONS	$3,045.02	INTERNET CONNECTION FOR MAY 2003 ADDITIONAL DOWNLOADS FOR DECEMBER 2002 ADDITIONAL DOWNLOADS FOR APRIL 2003
36178	28-May-03	CANCER FOUNDATION OF WA	$26.85	PROCEEDS OF MORNING TEA HELD 22/05/03
36179	30-May-03	ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENDERS OFFICE	$55.00	COAST LAW IN WA TEXT BOOK FOR H SINGH
36180	30-May-03	EUROPEAN FOODS WHOLESALERS PTY LTD	$174.24	VARIOUS FOODS FOR MARKETING SERVICES
36181	30-May-03	SKILLPATH SEMINARS	$597.00	HOW TO BECOME A BETTER COMMUNICATOR SEMINAR 14/3/03 L SHUTTLETON THE BUSINESS WRITING BASICS SEMINAR D GREEN AND M MAHENDRAN
36182	30-May-03	NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF	$30.90	LEGAL EXPENSES FOR RATES DEPARTMENT
36183	30-May-03	ATA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS	$8,073.14	GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS - ROUND 4
36184	30-May-03	ROAD SAFETY SHOP	$1,144.00	REFLECTIVE BOLLARDS FOR ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION WORKS
36185	30-May-03	NATASHA STONE - ART OF FUN	$120.00	SUPERHEROS TUTOR SESSION ON 1/05/03 - GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY
36186	30-May-03	CAROL WALMSLEY	$50.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36187	30-May-03	EVENTS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION	$350.00	CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP - EVENT IND ASSOC - ROSS RAYSON
36188	30-May-03	HERITAGE OFFICER PETTY CASH	$99.95	PETTY CASH
36189	30-May-03	JEFFREY SHORE	$15.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36190	30-May-03	WANNEROO YOUTH CENTRE PETTY CASH	$93.80	PETTY CASH
36191	30-May-03	AMARA PRIMERO	$20.00	MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT FOR QUINNS DAY CENTRE
36192	30-May-03	K ABEL	$50.00	BOND REFUND
36193	30-May-03	EKATERINA & JOHN DAVIDSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36194	30-May-03	R J HYSEN & K L STONE	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36195	30-May-03	J & J POPOVSKA	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36196	30-May-03	M & M BALOGH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36197	30-May-03	G J WILCOX	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36198	30-May-03	R C TIEDTKE & A WALDEN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36199	30-May-03	C T BLOTT & G A GEORGE	$284.23	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36200	30-May-03	D R DIMMACK P A THOMAS & R J DIMMACK	$50.00	RATES REFUND P/N 141672 - OVERPAYMENT
36201	30-May-03	CONCENTINA MOBILIA	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36202	30-May-03	JENNIFER A & THOMAS A FITZGERALD	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36203	30-May-03	CARINE NOMINEES	$25.00	OVERPAYMENT OF SUBDIVISION CLEARANCE FEE (WAPS REF 116582)
36204	30-May-03	PHILLIPS FOX	$100.00	REIMBURSEMENT OF SECTION 40 FEE - 4 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE, WANGARA
36205	30-May-03	ROSIE BEAUMOND	$33.00	REIMBURSEMENT COPY OF BUILDING PLANS - 7 HUBBLE PARKWAY, CLARKSON
36206	30-May-03	SETTLERS RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE	$314.31	REIMBURSEMENT OF COPY OF BUILDING APPLICATION FEE - 76 RIDGEWOOD BOULV RIDGEWOOD
36207	30-May-03	ROCKINGHAM REGIONAL CAMPUS TAFE	$10.00	DAMAGED BOOK BY CITY READER
36208	30-May-03	STEWART FRANKLIN	$91.30	LOST BOOKS PAID & RETURNED
36209	30-May-03	BAYSWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY	$12.10	BOOKS LOST IN TRANSIT
36210	30-May-03	TWO ROCKS YANCHEP ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP	$300.00	DONATION FOR START UP COSTS COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
36211	30-May-03	CAROL HARKINK	$68.00	REFUND - TERM 2 SWIMMING LESSONS
36212	30-May-03	TINA PAVITT	$59.50	REFUND -TERM 2 SWIMMING LESSONS
36213	30-May-03	P WELCH	$314.00	REFUND - D A FEE OVERCHARGED - 7 TALARA COURT, MINDARIE
36214	30-May-03	KIM PEPPIATT	$300.00	BOND REFUND - WANNEROO SENIOR CITIZENS HALL
36215	30-May-03	PAM TOMKINS	$300.00	BOND REFUND - WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE
36216	30-May-03	JANET BROWN	$12.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36217	30-May-03	JOHANNA NEAL	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36218	30-May-03	CATHERINE MOLYNEUX	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36219	30-May-03	DEBORAH WILSON	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36220	30-May-03	ENID CUMMINGS	$6.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36221	30-May-03	RICHARD WILKERSON	$20.00	DOG REGISTRATION REFUND
36222	30-May-03	M A & J L PICKWORTH	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36223	30-May-03	S J & C GAHGAN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36224	30-May-03	M C & M A BENNETT	$195.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36225	30-May-03	A G & R L GIBB	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36226	30-May-03	J C & M E VAN MAANEN	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36227	30-May-03	R T E TEALE	$250.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36228	30-May-03	R PATERSON	$345.00	VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY
36229	30-May-03	BROADWATER BUNGALOWS RESORT	$700.00	BUNGALOWS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
36230	30-May-03	COASTAL SERVICES	$790.90	GAS & ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
36231	30-May-03	CASEWEST PTY LTD	$103.60	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36232	30-May-03	DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD	$531.08	SIGNS FOR PARKS AND ENGINEERING
36233	30-May-03	E R S AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	$355.85	SERVICES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
36234	30-May-03	ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD	$146.67	TREE DISPOSAL FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE
36235	30-May-03	GLAZEWELL P/L	$1,069.07	GLASS REPAIRS FOR WANNEROO RECREATION CENTRE & WANNEROO LIBRARY
36236	30-May-03	HARBOTTLE ON-PREMISE	$230.31	VARIOUS ITEMS FOR MARKETING
36237	30-May-03	ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY	$666.25	PHOTOCOPIER METER READING VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS UF560 CALL OUT SERVICE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
36238	30-May-03	KNIGHT & SONS	$222.65	FOOD FOR ANIMAL CARE CENTRE
36239	30-May-03	LINCOLNE SCOTT	$17,361.30	CONTRACT SERVICES FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
36240	30-May-03	NATIONAL ROADS CONGRESS 2003 CONFERENCE LOGISTICS	$725.00	REGISTRATION OF H SINGH AT NATIONAL LOCAL ROADS CONGRESS 2003
36241	30-May-03	PARKS SERVICES & SUPPLIES	$3,863.00	SOFT FALL MAINTENANCE ON PLAYGROUND AREAS
36242	30-May-03	READYMIX HOLDINGS PTY LTD	$514.14	SUPPLY & DELIVER TO KINGSWAY CAR PARK AT THE BACK OF NETBALL COURTS
36243	30-May-03	TOTAL EDEN WATERING SYSTEMS	$4,865.50	RETIC ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK MARMION AVENUE& UKIN DRIV REINSTALLATION OF AUTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM
36244	30-May-03	WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES	$494.70	MILK SUPPLIES FOR CITY
36245	30-May-03	W A LIMESTONE CO	$580.73	75MM LIMESTONE AS PER TENDER REINHOLD PL
36246	30-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TURF INDUSTRIES	$43,261.64	MARANGAROO & CARRAMAR MAINTENANCE WORKS
36247	30-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$2,369.28	RECYCLING CALENDAR
36248	30-May-03	AUSTRALIA POST	$190.00	REGPOST PREPAID X 2
36249	30-May-03	ALINTA GAS	$67.60	RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
36250	30-May-03	ALEXANDER HTS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$57.10	PETTY CASH
36251	30-May-03	ALEXANDER HEIGHTS - THE HEIGHTS COMM HOUSE PETTY CASH	$86.90	PETTY CASH
36252	30-May-03	ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP PETTY CASH	$51.60	PETTY CASH
36253	30-May-03	AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPER FUND	$807.69	PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS FOR STAFF
36254	30-May-03	COMMODORE HOMES	$156.90	REIMBURSEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE = 23 REDCLIFFE AVENUE, MARANGAROO
36255	30-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO PAYROLL A/C	$1,377.80	RATES PAYROLL F/E 23/05/03
36256	30-May-03	CITY OF WANNEROO	$6,486.54	USAGE OF OLYMPIC KINGSWAY SPORTS CLUB ALEXANDER HEIGHTS SENIOR CITIZENS
36257	30-May-03	COMMUNITY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$207.87	PETTY CASH
36258	30-May-03	STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH	$155.45	PETTY CASH
36259	30-May-03	GLOUCESTER LODGE MUSEUM P/CASH	$98.66	PETTY CASH
36260	30-May-03	INTEGRATED WORKFORCE LIMITED	$543.27	LOADER OPERATOR FOR DEPOT
36261	30-May-03	LEISURE & LIBRARY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$48.90	PETTY CASH
36262	30-May-03	QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE P/CASH	$88.20	PETTY CASH
36263	30-May-03	RANGERS & SAFETY SERVICES PETTY CASH	$235.35	PETTY CASH
36264	30-May-03	TELSTRA CORPORATION	$18,841.40	TELSTRA ACCOUNT FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
36265	30-May-03	WANNEROO PLUMBING	$2,598.55	PLUMBING SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY SITES
36266	30-May-03	WANNEROO ELECTRIC	$1,231.03	GUMBLOSSOM BOWLING CLUB -LOCATE POLE WITH MISSING INSPECTION PLATE WORKS AT WANNEROO ADMIN BUILDING
36267	30-May-03	WANNEROO LIBRARY PETTY CASH	$97.75	PETTY CASH
36268	30-May-03	WATER CORPORATION	$7,357.55	WATER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS SITES
36269	30-May-03	WESTERN POWER	$31,453.50	POWER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS SITES RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
36270	30-May-03	YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE P/CASH	$132.20	YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE PETTY CASH
36271	30-May-03	ZURICH	$500.00	EXCESS FOR WN31860 - DOL- 7 MAY 2003
36272	30-May-03	ZURICH CLIENT SERVICE	$235.38	P/ROLL F/E 23/5/03 P/N 02073765 - V HUMPHRIES
36273	30-May-03	NEALS MECHANICAL SERVICES	$6,600.00	ECO DETOUR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT - 8 WEEK CONSULTANCY PROGRAM FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
36274	30-May-03	S NEALE	$550.00	1ST RATE ENERGY EFFICIENCY SOFTWARE (CD)
50000727	05-May-03	RICHARD RODIC	$2,246.95	RESIGNATION 18/04/03
50000728	05-May-03	RICHARD MILLER	$734.73	WORKERS COMP PAYMENT P/E 25/04/03
50000729	06-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	$192,247.80	REF.642959811651070 PAYROLL DEDUCTION F/E 25/04/03
50000730	06-May-03	TERRY LOFTUS	$692.50	TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL 2003
50000731	07-May-03	SHARON KABLE	$32.65	IN HOME CARE
50000732	07-May-03	WG & FE STOCKS	$87.17	IN HOME CARE
50000733	07-May-03	MARGARET MCMAHON	$1,703.59	IN HOME CARE
50000734	07-May-03	JULIE GASTON	$75.96	IN HOME CARE
50000735	07-May-03	JENNY STONES	$243.81	IN HOME CARE
50000736	07-May-03	BRETT TREBY	$212.69	EXPENSE CLAIM – MARCH - MAY 2003
50000737	08-May-03	STATEWEST CREDIT SOCIETY	$165.00	REVIEW HESTER AVENUE RAILWAY CROSSING RISK ASSESSMENT
50000738	08-May-03	IAN GOODENOUGH	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000739	08-May-03	JUDITH HUGHES	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000740	08-May-03	JON KELLY	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000741	08-May-03	TERRY LOFTUS	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000742	08-May-03	GLYNIS MONKS	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000743	08-May-03	LOUISE MCNAMARA	$2,599.51	TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR MARCH 2003 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000744	08-May-03	RUDI STEFFENS	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000745	08-May-03	JOHN STEWART	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000746	08-May-03	BRETT TREBY	$2,000.00	TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLOWANCE - 06/05/03 TO 05/05/04
50000747	13-May-03	WG & FE STOCKS	$115.98	IN HOME CARE F/E 11/05/03
50000748	13-May-03	MARGARET MCMAHON	$1,046.79	IN HOME CARE F/E 11/05/03
50000749	13-May-03	JULIE GASTON	$75.96	IN HOME CARE F/E 11/05/03
50000750	13-May-03	JENNY STONES	$256.71	IN HOME CARE F/E 11/05/03
50000751	13-May-03	MAUREEN GRIERSON	$169.96	TRAVEL EXPENSES 1/04/03-2/05/03
50000752	13-May-03	NICK DEL BORRELLO	$1,144.00	MATERIALS & LABOUR FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE
50000753	16-May-03	MARK PEARSON	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000754	16-May-03	GARY MARTIN	$3,762.00	REVIEW OF RATEABLE PROPERTIES FROM UV TO GRV
50000755	16-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE - PAYG PAYMENTS	$185,763.80	PAYROLL F/E 09/05/03 REF 642959811651070
50000756	16-May-03	IAN GOODENOUGH	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE-MAY 2003
50000757	16-May-03	JUDITH HUGHES	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000758	16-May-03	JON KELLY	$6,000.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000759	16-May-03	TERRY LOFTUS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000760	16-May-03	GLYNIS MONKS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000761	16-May-03	LOUISE MCNAMARA	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000762	16-May-03	RUDI STEFFENS	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000763	16-May-03	JOHN STEWART	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000764	16-May-03	BRETT TREBY	$500.00	MONTHLY ALLOWANCE FOR MAY 2003
50000765	16-May-03	MIRELLA CARSLAKE	$188.59	UNDERPAYMENT - 736231 - 536154
50000766	19-May-03	CLEMENT WILLIAMS	$25.00	REFUND PAY - 13131
50000767	19-May-03	DEAN BARROWCLIFFE	$1,105.03	CASUAL REQUISITION NOT RECEIVED IN TIME FOR PAY
50000768	21-May-03	TONY DURMANICH	$1,537.84	CASUAL REQUISITION NOT COMPLETED IN TIME FOR PAY
50000769	21-May-03	JARROD MOHR	$2,165.15	RESIGNATION/TERMINATION 21/05/03
50000770	21-May-03	NYSSA ASTLE	$1,299.05	END OF FIXED TERM CONTRACT
50000771	22-May-03	NAOMI RAKELA	$2,264.98	RESIGNATION/TERMINATION - 22/05/03
50000772	26-May-03	ALMANS SPORTS REPAIRS	$22.00	DELIVERY OF TENNIS NETS FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE
50000773	26-May-03	FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LIMITED	$5,911.94	WINDOWS SERVER/MS EXCHANGE/OFFICE XP PAYROLL PROCESSING FOR MAY 2003
50000774	26-May-03	KEY HYDRAULICS	$462.00	MRF WANGARA, WORK CARRIED OUT
50000775	26-May-03	SANAX /ST ANDREWS PHARMACY	$265.70	HYPO NEEDLES/COTTON BALLS/SYRINGES/TAPE - HEALTH SERVICES
50000776	28-May-03	TERRY LOFTUS	$628.57	TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR MAY 2003
50000777	28-May-03	RECYCLING CO OF WA PTY LTD	$6,050.00	PURCHASE FOR CROSS BELT MAGNET
50000778	29-May-03	RICHARD MILLER	$989.89	WORKERS COMP NOT PAID P/E 23/05/03
50000779	29-May-03	GRACE BRUNSDEN	$1,001.93	EMPLOYEE TIMESHEET IN TIME BUT WAS NOT AUTHORISED
50000780	29-May-03	JEFF ISAACS	$1,068.96	CASH OUT ANNUAL LEAVE – 10674
50000781	29-May-03	MAURICE SETH	$420.29	LEAVE KEYED INCORRECTLY BY FUJITSU
50000782	30-May-03	AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE – PAYG PAYMENTS	$182,506.80	BEING PAYROLL DED: F/E 23/5/03 REF 64295811651070
		SUBTOTAL	$4,067,373.85

LESS CANCELLED CHEQUES
32951	06-Feb-03	SANDS & MAC	-$9,804.78
34175	27-Mar-03	PHASE 1 AUDIO	-$2,160.00
35312	28-Apr-03	TOOLMART	-$196.00
		SUBTOTAL	-$12,160.78

TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNT RECOUP FOR MAY 2003			$4,055,213.07

City of Wanneroo Municipal Account

Cheque	Date	Paid To	Amount	Details
000013	04-Jun-03	DIRECTOR CORP SERVICES ADV ACCT	$4,055,213.07	RECOUP CHEQUE NO: 35365 - 36274 EFT NO: 50000727 - 50000782
		SUBTOTAL	$4,055,213.07

OTHERS
000013A	09-May-03	COMMONWEALTH BANK	$25,458.51	FDC SALARIES
			$906.45	MERCHANT FEES
			$90.65	GST
			$636.36	GLF FEES
			$63.64	GST
			$113.80	CBA EFTPOS FEE
			$11.38	GST
			$120.00	DISHONOUR
			$727.27	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO COUN. IINET
			$72.73	GST
			$93.64	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO CITY OF ARMADALE
			$9.36	GST
			$1,176.36	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO CONFERENCE
			$117.64	GST
			$68.18	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - DCS SEMINAR
			$6.82	GST
			$116.64	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT – DCD HOSPITALITY
			$11.66	GST
			$105.45	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT – DCD CONFERENCE
			$10.55	GST
			$2.50	BANK FEES
			-$1,780.10	DISHONOURED CHEQUE PROCESSED TWICE IN ERROR APR 03 - REBANKED
		SUBTOTAL	$28,139.49

	16-May-03	COMMONWEALTH BANK	$213.70	CREDIT CARD FEE
			$21.37	GST
			$565,397.10	SALARIES
			$6,951.13	SALARY DEDUCTIONS
			$2.50	SALARY RETURN FEE
			$2,365.09	BANK FEES
			$236.51	GST
			$150.91	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - DPD HOSPITALITY
			$15.09	GST
			$263.64	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT – DCD CONFERENCE
			$26.36	GST
			$450.91	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO CONFERENCE
			$45.09	GST
			$1,113.64	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO NAT CONGRESS
			$111.36	GST
			$1,113.64	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO NAT CONGRESS
			$111.36	GST
			$804.55	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO NAT CONGRESS
			$80.45	GST
			$43.27	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO HOSPITALITY
			$4.33	GST
			$76.36	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - CEO PROMOTION
			$7.64	GST
		SUBTOTAL	$579,606.00

	23-May-03	COMMONWEALTH BANK	-$60.00	REVERSE DISHONOUR INCORRECTLY JOURNALED 30-APR-03
			-$400,000.00	TRANSFER TO FINANCE MARKETS
		SUBTOTAL	-$400,060.00

	31-May-03	COMMONWEALTH BANK	$558,309.85	SALARY
			$6,967.93	SALARY DEDUCTIONS
			$1,002.50	CREDIT CARD PAYMENT – DPD HOSPITALITY AND ACCOMMODATION
			$100.25	GST
			$100.00	RATES DISHONOUR
			$4,055,213.07	ADVANCE RECOUP
		SUBTOTAL	$4,621,693.60

TOTAL MUNICIPAL ACCOUNT FOR MAY 2003			$4,829,379.09

CS02-07/03 Financial Report for the Period Ended 31 May 2003

File Ref: S13/0001V01

File Name: BBFinancial Report for the Period Ended 31 May 2003.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 18 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Mike Cole Date 16 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Manager Finance

Meeting Date: 1/7/2003

Attachments: 2

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the monthly financial report for the period ended 31 May 2003.

Background

Regulation 34(1)(a) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a financial report to be presented to Council on a monthly basis.

Detail

The financial report for the period ended 31 May 2003 has been completed and is attached (Attachment 1 refers).

The report comprises an Operating Statement by Program and Nature and a Cash Flow Statement for the period ended 31 May 2003, plus a Statement of Financial Position as at 31 May 2003. In addition to the above, the report includes a summary of the City’s Investment Portfolio, Rate Debtors and Sundry Debtors.

A separate report on the City’s Capital Expenditure is also attached. (Attachment 2 refers).

Consultation

Nil

Comment

The report represents eleven months of operations for the City in 2002/03 or 92% of the year elapsed.

Operating Revenue and Expenditure

With the exception of Developer Contributions, which are recognised at year-end, Operating revenues to the end of May 2003, including Rates, are approximately 98% of the full year budget. Areas contributing to the Operating revenues being ahead of budget include:

· Rates 100%

· Service Charges 100% Includes annual refuse charges raised as part of rates.

· Fees and charges 100% Includes Building Licences and Development Applications.

· Interest Earnings 138% Due to higher than anticipated levels of funds held in

investments throughout the year.

Year-to-date operating expenditures are only 74% of the full year budget. Major areas of expenditure are:

· Employees Costs 88%

· Materials and Contracts 52%

· Utilities 82%

Should the current trend with Operating Revenues and Expenditures continue, a surplus in excess of $5.0 million is expected at year-end.

Capital Expenditure

With regard to the Capital Expenditure, expenditure and commitments compared to the Management Budget are as follows:

· Capital Works Programme 78%

· Building Works 48%

· Developer Contributions 0% Normally recognised at year end

· Plant and Equipment Purchases 76%

· Plant and Equipment Disposals 82%

· Minor Building Works 69%

· Capital New Initiatives 64%

The summary of Capital Expenditure (Attachment 2 refers) is included and contains comments where appropriate.

Statutory Compliance

The monthly financial report for the period ended 31 May 2003 complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulation 34(1)(a) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

Strategic Implications

“Goal 4 Corporate Management and Development – Committed to proper management of our financial resources.”

Policy Implications

Nil.

Financial Implications

Nil.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council NOTES the monthly financial report for the period ended 31 May 2003.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 1 of 6

FINANCIAL REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 31 MAY 2003

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 6

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 3 of 6

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 4 of 6

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 5 of 6

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 6 of 6

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Contracts and Property

CS03-07/03 Quinns Beach Cafe Development - Business Plan

File Ref: P22/0418V01

File Name: CAQUINNS BEACH CAFE DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS PLAN.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 18 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by John Paton Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by John Paton Date 16 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 1

Author: John Paton

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the draft Business Plan, prepared in accordance with Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act for the development of a café on Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie.

Background

In March 2000, the City of Wanneroo appointed consultants to prepare a Structure Plan for the development of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie. The Structure Plan acknowledged the importance of the site as a recreation and tourism node and provided precincts for the development of:

· Community facilities, including a surf lifesaving club, community building, café/restaurant, playground and BBQ areas;

· Tourist facilities, including the caravan park;

· Bush Conservation area;

· Coastal recreation area.

The Structure Plan was subject to an extended period of public consultation and following the receipt and consideration of public submissions, was adopted by Council in May 2001. The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) adopted the Structure Plan in November 2001 with minor modifications relating to the preparation of an environmental management plan.

At the Council meeting held on 18 December 2001, Council considered a development proposal submitted by the City for community buildings, including the surf club facility, café and community building on Lot 211. Council agreed to advertise the proposal for a period of 42 days, resulting in a number of public submissions, generally in support of the proposal. In April 2002, the Council resolved to support the development and advise the WAPC of their recommendation.

Conditional approval for the development plan was received from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) in September 2002. The conditions focussed on the submission of further detailed plans prior to development and the resolution of issues relating to parking, landscaping and access.

In order to address these issues, James Christou & Partners were appointed to review the development plan and undertake a comprehensive Master Planning exercise. This resulted in the WAPC granting a revised development approval (letter dated 3 April 2003) for the first stage works, including the Essential Services Building and car parking facilities.

In terms of the café development, it was proposed to offer a ground lease of a suitable area of Lot 211 and thereby seek private funding of the design, construction and operation of the building, including public toilets and change rooms. To ensure the best outcome, the project was the subject of considerable deliberation and planning, including consultation with other coastal local governments that have undertaken similar projects, together with commercial, architectural and legal advice. As a result, it was determined that a two stage tendering process, commencing with an Expression of Interest (EOI) would be the most effective method to apply. In addition, the following principles were factored into the EOI documentation:

· to optimise patronage of the café/restaurant facility, it should be targeted at the family and marketed as a ‘Café’;

· to ensure viability, a minimum 150 seating capacity has been indicated;

· the developer/operator is to be responsible for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the entire building, including the public toilets and change rooms;

· the City is to provide the required parking facilities;

· the lease has a Term of 21 years with an option for a further 10 years.

At its meeting held on 26 November 2002, the Council considered a report on the draft terms and conditions for the calling of Expressions of Interest to develop and operate the Café facility. The following resolution was adopted:

“That Council APPROVES in principle the calling of Expressions of Interest for the design, construction and leasing of a Café/Restaurant/Kiosk on Lot 211, Quinns Road, Mindarie.”

Detail

The EOI was advertised on 17 May 2003 and closed on 17 June 2003. In addition to the normal commercial aspects of the tender, a development of this nature is impacted by the City’s legislative requirements, therefore, the following issues need to be considered and interfaced into the overall tendering and approval process:

1. The lease between the City (Lessor) and Developer/Operator (Lessee)

2. Business Plan (Major Land Transaction)

3. Land Disposition

Lease

In order to control the proposed development, the City’s Solicitors, Kott Gunning Lawyers have drafted the following agreements (copies placed in Councillor’s Reading Room) that will be included in the second stage of the tender for the information of Tenderers:

1. Agreement To Lease covers the period of the development of the café building on the development site (Attachment 1 refers);

2. Lease takes effect from Practical Completion of the development and continues throughout the Term.

It is a requirement of the Town Planning and Development Act (Section 20) that WAPC approval is obtained for leases on buildings, where the Term exceeds 21 years (including options). Procedurally, approval is to be sought at the draft lease stage and also after execution. Whilst there may be some minor variations negotiated with the successful Tenderer, to ensure timely processes, the existing drafts have been forwarded to the WAPC for their initial consideration.

Business Plan

Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act addresses Commercial Enterprises undertaken by local governments. Under this provision, the proposed leasing of portion of Lot 211 would constitute a Major Land Transaction and therefore, prior to approval to commence would require:

· the preparation of a business Plan;

· local and statewide advertising of the proposed disposition; and

· consideration of any submissions received.

The Business Plan has been drafted and is detailed fully in the recommendation.

Land Disposition

The café development consists of two elements; provision of goods and services (the building) and a land disposition (lease). Section 3.58 specifically deals with Disposing of Property and in particular the process that must be followed. As the disposal of land element of the transaction will be negotiated by Private Treaty, to fully comply with this section of the Act, it will be necessary to give statewide public notice of the proposed disposition, prior to formally accepting a particular Tender. This issue will be addressed at a subsequent Council meeting.

Consultation

The proposed development of Lot 211, including the provision of a café/restaurant has been the subject of considerable public consultation, from the initial Structure Plan, through to the advertising of the Development Application. In addition, further public consultation is required to comply with the Business Plan and Land Disposition provisions of the Local Government Act.

Comment

As the EOI/Tender has commenced for the development of the building incorporating a café, kiosk, toilets and change rooms, it is necessary to ensure that all of the legislative requirements are addressed. This is a complex transaction and involves interfacing various procedures and approvals strategically into the overall tender timetable. The following target timetable has been proposed to ensure an overall level of compliance:-

17/5/03 EOI advertised

13/6/03 Draft lease agreement forwarded to WAPC for approval

17/6/03 EOI submissions close (in tender box)

30/6/03 Submissions evaluated and short list selected (Delegated Authority to CEO)

04/7/03 Tender document prepared and short-list invited to submit formal tender proposal

01/7/03 Council to consider/endorse the Business Plan (S3.59 – Major Land Transaction)

05/7/03 Business Plan advertised

22/7/03 Tenders close

12/8/03 Council to approve the preferred Tenderer, subject to consideration of any submissions received on the Business Plan and Land Disposition Notice.

16/8/03 Advertise the proposed Land Disposition (S3.58(3))

18/8/03 Close of submission period for Business Plan

01/9/03 Close of advertising period for the Land Disposition

02/9/03 Council to consider any submissions received regarding the Business Plan and Land Disposition, prior to approving entering into a contract with the preferred Tenderer.

In accordance with the above timetable, the next step is the endorsement of the business plan and approval to advertise the Council’s intention to commence a Major Land Transaction. Although the ideal time to prepare the business plan is after the tender and lease arrangements are finalised, that would create an undesirable delay in the approval process. In view of this, the business plan has been formatted to contain the level of information prescribed by legislation and reflects the nature of the transaction likely to be implemented. In the unlikely event that the final agreement substantially departs from this plan, then it may be necessary to amend the Business Plan.

Statutory Compliance

For the City to enter into a lease arrangement on an area of land for the development of a café, the following statutory requirements must be addressed:

Local Government Act

· Section 3.58 Disposing of Property

This section defines the process that must be followed by local governments intending to dispose of an interest in land, including a lease. Effectively, this can only occur by public auction, tender or private treaty negotiation, after providing statewide public notice of the proposed ‘consideration’ to be received.

· Section 3.59 Commercial Enterprises by Local Governments

This section imposes a Business Planning process on local governments proposing to undertake a major land transaction with a value greater than a defined amount. Over the Term of the lease, this criteria is likely to be met, therefore preparation, approval and advertising of an appropriate Business Plan is necessary.

Town Planning and Development Act

· Section 20 Plans of Subdivision to be Approved

This section requires approval by the WAPC of any Lease proposed to be entered into over buildings with a Term exceeding 21 years, including any option periods.

Strategic Implications

The leasing of a portion of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie and subsequent development and operation of a café incorporating public toilets and change rooms is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:-

“Healthy Communities

2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community

2.7 Provide community focused services and lifestyle opportunities”

Financial Implications

It is proposed that the construction and ongoing operation of the café development will be at the total cost of the developer/operator. A commercial ground lease will be negotiated, however the level of return for the City (lease fee) is likely to be related to the proposed capital expenditure incurred by the developer and corresponding pay back period.

As the café development will be rateable, there will also be additional revenue derived by the City through the collection of annual rates on the property.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES the advertising of the Business Plan for the Lease of Portion of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie for a period of 42 days in accordance with Section 3.59 (4) of the Local Government Act 1995, as detailed below:

BUSINESS PLAN

BACKGROUND

In March 2000, the City of Wanneroo appointed consultants to prepare a Structure Plan for the development for Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie. The Structure Plan acknowledged the importance of the site as a recreation and tourism node. It provided precincts for the development of:

- Community facilities, including a surf lifesaving club, community building, café/restaurant, playground and BBQ areas;

- Tourist facilities, including the caravan park;

- Bush Conservation area;

- Coastal recreation area.

This development is proposed to be undertaken in the following stages:

Stage 1 Surf Lifesaving facility, car parking and landscaping

Stage 2 Café/Restaurant facility and public toilets/change rooms

Stage 3 Foreshore improvements, landscaping, additional parking and a community facility

WAPC approval has been received for the Stage 1 works and a separate application will be submitted for Stages 2 & 3. The City is proposing to obtain commercial interest for the development of a family oriented café building and will require the Developer to obtain all necessary approvals.

THE PROPERTY DISPOSITION

The City of Wanneroo proposes to facilitate the construction of a building comprising a café, kiosk and public toilets/change rooms, by offering prospective developers a ground lease over approximately 2100m² of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie. Under this proposal, whilst ownership of the building will transfer to the City, a leasehold interest will be retained by the Developer throughout the term of the lease.

In order to achieve the best ‘value’ proposal, the City is implementing a two stage tender process, commencing with a publicly advertised Expressions of Interest. The tender documentation will incorporate a proposed lease, which will be negotiated with the preferred tenderer. Once agreement has been reached and a decision made on the development considered the most advantageous, prior to acceptance, the City will advertise the details of the land disposition (lease) and invite public submissions in accordance with Section 3.58 (3) of the Local Government Act.

The principal Terms of the proposed lease are;

Term 21 Years with 10 year option

Rent As agreed within the tender process.

Use of Premises Facilities to be used exclusively for the following purposes:

- café/restaurant

- kiosk

- public toilets & change rooms

Lessee Works The Lessee is to construct the café building “the Works” in accordance with:

- the agreed development plans and specifications;

- all approvals and in compliance with the requirements of applicable legislation and regulations; and

- the approved timetable.

Building Maintenance During the entire term, the Lessee is responsible for the repairs and maintenance to the Premises, including the public toilets and change rooms.

Assignment No assignment or subletting of the Premises or part of the Premises without the prior approval in writing of the Lessor.

Outgoings The Lessee is responsible for all outgoings associated with the Premises, including those applicable to the public toilets and change rooms.

EXPECTED EFFECT ON THE PROVISION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES BY THE CITY (SECTION 3.59(3)(a))

The proposed ground lease will facilitate the provision of a commercial development incorporating public toilets and change rooms, at no cost to the City. These facilities will replace the current toilet block, with modern facilities, operated, cleaned and maintained by the Lessee. The development is expected to create a significant improvement to the facilities provided to the local community.

EXPECTED EFFECT ON OTHER PERSONS PROVIDING FACILITIES AND SERVICES IN THE DISTRICT (SECTION 3.59(3)(b))

It is anticipated that the café development will provide flow on benefits to the community and service providers in the area. During the construction stage, this is anticipated to generate income to the area from the work force. Subsequently, the development should have a positive impact on the provision of employment, contract work and supply of goods.

There are very limited eating houses in the vicinity, therefore it is unlikely to create significant competition to other operators.

THE EXPECTED FINANCIAL EFFECT ON THE CITY OF WANEROO (SECTION 3.59(3)(c))

In accordance with Section 3.58 (4)(c), a market valuation will be obtained to verify that the proposed lease fee is equitable.

As the café development will be rateable, there will also be additional revenue derived by the City through the collection of annual rates on the property.

EXPECTED EFFECT ON MATTERS CONTAINED IN THE CITY’S PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES PLAN (SECTION 3.59(3)(d))

The City’s Principal Activities Plan 2002-2006 highlights the importance of “Healthy Communities” and incorporates a strategic goal:

To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and provision of quality services and infrastructure

It is recognised that facilities that bring a community together are important aspects of the services provided by the City of Wanneroo. This project complements this philosophy and extends the Stage 1 works - Quinns/Mindarie Surf Lifesaving Facility listed on the Principal Activity Plan.

THE ABILITY OF THE CITY TO MANAGE THE TRANSACTION (SECTION 3.59(3)(e))

The City will be obtaining professional support in the development of the Lease documentation and commercial negotiations. The City manages a range of building projects and a substantial property portfolio. The addition of this property lease can be accommodated with no impact on staffing levels.

OTHER MATTERS (SECTION 3.59(3)(f))

The City is not aware of any other matters or regulations, which are relevant to the proposed lease of this property.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Community Development

Community Services

CD01-07/03 Tender 03300 The Provision of Specialised Care Services for Eligible Aged and Disabled Residents of the City of Wanneroo

File Ref: S07/0004V02

File Name: AATender 03300 The Provision of Specialised Care Services for Eligible Aged and Disabled Residents of the City of Wann.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 25 June 2003

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Mark Teale

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

Assessment and recommendation of Tender No. 03300 – The Provision of Specialised Care Services for Eligible Aged and Disabled Residents of the City of Wanneroo.

Background

In January 2000 the City advertised a tender for the provision of specialised care services for eligible aged and disabled residents living within the City of Wanneroo. The City requires the contractor to provide staff to provide care services in the home as part of its Home and Community Care (HACC) and Community Aged Care Packages (CACP) programs. Care services that are included in the contract are:

1. Domestic assistance (home help);

2. Personal care; and

3. Respite (in home).

In March 2000 the contract was awarded to Homecare Pursuits for a period of three years (to expire 31 March 2003). On the 7 August 2002 Homecare Pursuits wrote to the City to request termination of the contract, claiming that changes made to the wages system by the State Government that could not have been foreseen at the time of signing the contract in March 2000 have resulted in labour costs that now exceed contract prices.

As a result of this the tender was advertised for a period of nine months, to finish on 30 June 2003. At its meeting of 9 September 2002 Council resolved the following:

“That Council ACCEPTS the tender from Homecare Pursuits for the provision of specialised care services for eligible aged and disabled residents living within the City of Wanneroo, as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering contained within tender 02264.”

As noted, the term of this contract is due to expire on 30 June 2003. As such, the tender for the provision of specialised care services for eligible aged and disabled residents living within the City of Wanneroo for a period of 12 months was advertised on 24 May 2003 and closed on 10 June 2003.

Detail

The City received 5 responses to its advertised tender. These were received from:

1. Homecare Pursuits (current provider);

2. White Oak Care Services;

3. The Carers;

4. Stanhope Nursing Services; and

5. Perth Home Care Services.

Attachment 1 provides some background information on each of the above companies.

The Manager, Community Services and Team Leader, Aged and Disability Services evaluated these tenders against the following criteria:

1. Price for the Services offered including a demonstrated ability to satisfy the requirements of the Service in the most cost effective manner;

2. Tenderer’s resources, demonstrated strategies to reduce carer turnover for individual clients, quality control measures and proven ability to complete assigned services within a specified timeframe; and

3. Tenderer’s quality of service and previous experience in carrying out services similar to the Services including the tenderer’s experience in the industry and approach to occupational safety and health during performance of the Service.

The tender evaluation resulted in the following scores out of 100:

White Oak Home Care	Perth Home Care	The Carers	Homecare Pursuits	Stanhope Home Nursing

85.04	57.04	88.48	85.44	60.48

Comment

All submissions were conforming, however it is evident that the most acceptable tender is that submitted by The Carers. Given The Carers ability to answer the selection criteria, and the information gained as a result of reference checks regarding the provision of specialised services in other areas, it is recommended that The Carers be accepted as the successful tenderer.

The Carers have a significant track record in the industry, having provided services for over 14 years. In some cases, The Carers have maintained contracts since their inception. The Carers have significant experience in working with local government and feedback gained from various referees supported the information contained in The Carers’ tender indicates a high level of satisfaction with services provided.

The final recommendation has been discussed with the Contracts and Property Department within Administration and met with support.

The tender period is 12 months to match the HACC funding contract that the City will have with the Department of Health.

Statutory Compliance

Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995 and associated regulations.

Strategic Implications

The continued provision of specialised care services is consistent with the City’s strategic plan in the following areas:

“2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity

2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities”

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The approximate value of the contract over a 12-month period is approximately $230,000.00. These costs are met with funding received from the state Department of Health (Home and Community Care) and the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging (Community Aged Care Packages).

No budget amendments are required as a result of calling this tender.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council ACCEPTS Tender number 03300 from The Carers for The Provision of Specialised Care Services for Eligible Aged and Disabled Residents of the City of Wanneroo, as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering and subject to confirmation of funding to be received from the Department of Health.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

Background Information on

Companies Submitting Tenders

The Carers

The Carers have been working in the home care industry since May 1989. Currently, The Carers is brokered by a range of government and non-government agencies and operate throughout the metropolitan area. The Carers have a well established reputation in the industry, being one of the longest in operation.

Homecare Pursuits

This company has been in operation since the late 1990s and has been the contracted provider of services to the City of Wanneroo since 2000. Homecare Pursuits currently holds contracts with a number of government and non-government agencies.

White Oak

White Oak Homecare Services is a quality endorsed West Australian owned and operated Company providing comprehensive community home care services to people of all ages and needs. The company was established in 1998.

Perth Homecare Services

This organisation has been in operation since 1967, and has concentrated on the provision of in home care services since the mid eighties. This organisation is not-for-profit and is the second largest agency providing HACC services in the Perth metropolitan region.

Stanhope

This company has been in operation since 1992 and has links across Australia. Stanhope provides services to a number of government and non-government agencies. Formerly known as Perth All Care.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

Leisure & Library Services

CD02-07/03 City of Wanneroo Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund Review Process.

File Ref: S17/0002V01

File Name: BACity of Wanneroo Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund Review Process .doc This line will not be printed dont

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Shane Spinks Date 16 June 2003delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Coordinator Leisure Services

Meeting Date: 01 July 2003

Attachments: 1

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the completion of the City of Wanneroo Review Process for the Department of Sport and Recreation’s Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund (CSRFF) grants and adoption of this process for implementation in the 2003 round of CSRFF grant applications commencing in July 2003.

Background

The Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund (CSRFF) is administered by the Department of Sport and Recreation (DSR) on behalf of the State Government. Each year the DSR makes funding available to community/sporting groups and Local Government to assist in the development of basic sport and recreation infrastructure, with the aim of the programme being to increase participation in sport and recreation through an emphasis on well planned facilities.

Each year the State Government makes approximately $9 million available through the CSRFF programme. Grants are made available through two categories, based on the size and complexity of the proposed projects and include Annual Grants and Forward Planning Grants.

Annual Grants are for amounts of $1,000 to $50,000 for projects requiring less complex planning processes. Grants that are given within this category must be claimed in the next financial year.

Forward Planning Grants are for amounts of $50,001 to $1.5 million for more complex projects that require a planning period between one to three years. Grants within this category are usually allocated over the funding triennium.

The type of projects that would be considered under the CSRFF include pool heating initiatives that extend seasonal use of swimming pools and increase participation, modifications and/or upgrading of existing facilities to increase opportunities for physical activity and to better suit current and future needs and the development of new sport and recreation facilities.

The maximum CSRFF grant approved is no greater than one-third of the total estimated cost of the project. In addition to this the contribution made by CSRFF must be matched by the applicants own cash contribution with the balance of the funds being provided by an alternative source. This may be provided by the Applicant, alternative grants or by Local Government, however it is important to note that Local Government is not required to contribute to any CSRFF grant application.

In May 2003, the City of Wanneroo’s Leisure Services undertook a review of the City’s existing processes relating to the review of CSRFF applications. The purpose of the study was to develop a clearly defined process relating to the administration and submission of CSRFF applications by the City of Wanneroo either independently or on behalf of community and sporting groups to the Department of Sport and Recreation.

The objective of the review was to develop a process relating to the submission of CSRFF grants to the Department of Sport and Recreation that:

Clearly identifies both the DSR and City of Wanneroo processes relating to the submission of CSRFF applications and the minimal requirements to be met by the applicant.

Clearly enunciates the basis on which submissions, both internal and external are assessed.

Establishes a separate internal process that identifies an agreed rolling programme of City of Wanneroo initiated CSRFF projects for each funding triennium.

Ensures that CSRFF applications that are put forward are in keeping with the Strategic Plan of the City of Wanneroo and provide maximum benefit and value for money for the community.

Detail

In terms of the City’s current CSRFF process, the study identified a number of broad issues that needed to be considered within the revised process. These include:

· That currently there is no detail in terms of how the applications are assessed by City of Wanneroo Administration. This includes, when the approval process is undertaken, who is involved and what the applicant is required to do.

· The current process does not take into account existing internal processes that influence or are influenced by the CSRFF grant process. These include the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, City of Wanneroo Strategic Capital Budget, City of Wanneroo Planning Framework and the City’s Leisure Strategy.

· The current process does not state any formal criteria for assessment of applications by the City of Wanneroo to ensure that proposed projects are in keeping with the City’s overall philosophy and strategy in relation to the provision of recreation and leisure facilities.

· There is currently no identification of internal CSRFF applications over the period of the current funding triennium and beyond.

The study also identified a number of other processes, both internal and external to the City of Wanneroo, which need to be considered within the process of reviewing CSRFF opportunities. These included:

Internal

External

City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan

Planning Framework – Design and Development of Leisure & Community Facilities

Leisure Strategy

Strategic Capital Budget

CSRFF

Department of Sport & Recreation – Strategic Directions III (2003 – 2005).

The study found that there were a number of Local Governments who had similar processes in place including the Cities of Joondalup, Stirling, Melville and Swan and the City of Wollongong in New South Wales. Analysis of these process found that these Local Governments had, in effect, two processes in place.

The first of these related directly to the Department of Sport and Recreation’s CSRFF grant application process, in which requests for funding assistance are considered by the Local Government and then the DSR based on the CSRFF guidelines. The second process relates to the question of assessing requests for support of capital projects by Local Government outside of the existing CSRFF framework.

As an outcome, the study identified a two-part framework for the review of CSRFF applications. The first part of this framework considers applications lodged by external community and sporting groups to the City of Wanneroo for consideration by Council, prior to be forwarded to the Department of Sport and Recreation. The second part of the framework considers the identification and prioritisation of CSRFF projects to be submitted by the City of Wanneroo Administration (refer to Attachment 1).

External Applications

In relation to the assessment of external applications, the following process detail and timeframe has been identified.

Process Detail

1. CSRFF Advertised by the City of Wanneroo.

2. CSRFF Workshop as part of the City of Wanneroo Smart Clubs Programme.

3. Distribution of Fact Sheet at the workshop outlining

3.1. City’s Philosophy

3.2. Basic CSRFF criteria

3.3. Documentation Required

4. Potential applicants to discuss application with Co-ordinator Leisure Services

4.1. At this stage potential applicants will be advised if the project is suitable and will be advised as to what changes are necessary to applications if they do not meet the CSRFF criteria.

4.2. Applicant will also be advised of the feasibility of receiving financial support from the City of Wanneroo.

4.3. Applicant must consider City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, Leisure Strategy and Planning Framework – Design and Development of Leisure & Community Facilities, where appropriate.

5. If application suitable - assign a Recreation Development Officer as a Liaison Officer with club.

6. Develop application following CSRFF grant application form and guidelines.

6.1. Must ensure Key Principles of Facility Provision.

6.2. Must ensure relevant supporting documentation is considered.

6.3. Must have considered items as per item 4.3.

7. Completed application submitted to City of Wanneroo

7.1. Closing date for submissions to be no less than four (4) weeks prior to the date that applications are put to Council for approval.

8. CSRFF Review Panel formed to review applications.

8.1. Develop initial ranking & priority with rationale provided based on:

· CSRFF assessment & rating criteria.

· City of Wanneroo philosophy & exclusions

· Items as listed under item 4.3

9. Site tour of facilities with EMT & Councillors

10. Recommendations put to Council OCM – last OCM in October

11. Recommendations forwarded to DSR by end of October

Process Outline and Timeframe.

Stage	Process Element	June	July	August	September	October
1.	CSRFF Advertised
2.	CSRFF Workshop
3.	Distribution of Fact Sheet at the CSRFF workshop
4.	Potential applicants to discuss application with Co-ordinator Leisure Services
5.	City of Wanneroo Liaison Officer
6.	Develop CSRFF application
7.	Closing date for application to the City of Wanneroo
8.	City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Panel
9.	Site tour – Executive Management & Council.
10.	Recommendations to Council
11.	Applications forwarded to DSR

Internal Applications

In relation to the assessment of internal applications, the following process detail and timeframe has been identified.

Process Detail

1. Review of projects to be considered for CSRFF

1.1. Occur during the development of capital budget.

2. Determination of priority by internal assessment group.

2.1. Determination of priority based on established criteria.

· Level of need within the community

· Potential community benefit

· Addressing issues of risk

3. Identification and development of supporting documentation requirements

3.1. Needs Analysis

3.2. Feasibility

3.3. Management Plan

4. Develop application following CSRFF grant application form and guidelines.

4.1. Must ensure Key Principles of Facility Provision.

4.2. Must ensure relevant supporting documentation is considered.

5. Submission of completed application.

5.1. Closing date for submissions to be no less than four (4) weeks prior to the date that applications are put to Council for approval.

6. CSRFF Review Panel formed to review applications.

6.1. Develop initial ranking & priority with rationale provided based on:

· CSRFF assessment & rating criteria.

· City of Wanneroo philosophy & exclusions

· Items as listed under item 4.3

7. Site tour of facilities with EMT & Councillors

8. Recommendations put to Council OCM – last OCM in October

9. Recommendations forwarded to DSR by end of October

Process Outline and Timeframe.

Stage	Process Element	Jan	Feb	Mar.	June	July	Aug.	Sept.	Oct.
1.	Review projects for CSRFF
2.	Determine priority – internal assessment group
3.	Identification & development of supporting documentation.
4.	Develop CSRFF application.
5.	Submission of completed application.
8.	City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Panel
9.	Site tour – Executive Management & Council.
10.	Recommendations to Council
11.	Applications forwarded to DSR

In addition to the process detail and timeframes outlined for both internal and external applications, the following philosophy and exclusions were also identified and were to be considered within the context of the City of Wanneroo review process in conjunction with the existing CSRFF guidelines.

Philosophy

That any application being considered by the City of Wanneroo should:

· Meet a clearly demonstrated need within the community.

· Support the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan and Leisure Strategy

· Provide maximum benefit and value for money for the community by providing multi purpose facilities and allow for general community uses (i.e. other community-based activities).

· Be financially viable, with the applicant able to demonstrate the ability to meet the financial commitment.

· Increases participation in recreational activity within the City.

· Include a clear management plan, where appropriate.

· Meet all relevant Australian Standards.

Exclusions

The City of Wanneroo will not consider applications for:

· Deficit funding,

· Recurrent salaries or operational costs

· Non-fixed equipment

· Projects that have already commenced or been completed

· The purchase of land

· Provision of bar facilities

· Development of privately owned facilities

· Facility maintenance

· Clubs/organisations who have outstanding debts with the City, or are failing to meet financial obligations with the City.

The study also considered the need to develop a separate process to consider requests for support of capital projects by Local Government outside the existing CSRFF framework. It will be recommended that this process be developed as a part of the development of the Planning Framework for the Design and Development of Leisure & Community Facilities to be undertaken by the Leisure & Library Services Business Unit and that the above philosophy and exclusion criteria also be included within this document.

Comment

The proposed City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Process has sought to provide clarity and direction to both the City of Wanneroo Administration and sporting and community groups, so that applications that are submitted to the City and therefore the DSR are well researched and documented applications. This process will also ensure that applications are relevant to the City’s overall strategic directions, are sustainable and so have a greater chance of successfully securing funds. The process has also been designed to ensure that all stakeholders are fully aware of the process itself and their responsibilities and most importantly provides an opportunity for Councillors to gain a first hand appreciation of the detail of each application, through a site tour of relevant facilities.

It is proposed that once the process has been adopted by Council it will be discussed with all sporting clubs and community groups at the SMART CLUBS CSRFF Seminar to be held at the City of Wanneroo Administration Centre on Monday 21 July 2003.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The implementation of the City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Process is aligned with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan through:

Goal 2 – Healthy Communities

“To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and provision of quality services and infrastructure.”

Specifically goal 2.6 “Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.”

Policy Implications

There are no direct policy implications relating to the proposed City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Process. It is however worth noting that this process compliments the City’s existing Community Funding Policy, specifically the Sport and Recreation Development Fund category of the Community Development Fund. The CSRFF process seeks to provide funding for capital items of $1,000 and above, while the City of Wanneroo Community Funding Policy provides financial support for sums up to $1,000 for sport and recreation groups.

Financial Implications

There are no direct financial implications resulting from this process. There may however, be future requests for the City to support grant applications to the Department of Sport and Recreation’s Community Sport Recreation Facility Fund (CSRFF) and in some instances to provide a financial contribution to such projects.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. ADOPTS the following processes for the assessment of internal and external Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund applications.

External Applications

In relation to the assessment of external applications, the following process detail and timeframe has been identified.

Process Detail

a) CSRFF Advertised by the City of Wanneroo.

b) CSRFF Workshop as part of the City of Wanneroo Smart Clubs Programme.

c) Distribution of Fact Sheet at the workshop outlining

i) City’s Philosophy

ii) Basic CSRFF criteria

iii) Documentation Required

d) Potential applicants to discuss application with Co-ordinator Leisure Services

i) At this stage potential applicants will be advised if the project is suitable and will be advised as to what changes are necessary to applications if they do not meet the CSRFF criteria.

ii) Applicant will also be advised of the feasibility of receiving financial support from the City of Wanneroo.

iii) Applicant must consider City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, Leisure Strategy and Planning Framework – Design and Development of Leisure & Community Facilities, where appropriate.

e) If application suitable - assign a Recreation Development Officer as a Liaison Officer with club.

f) Develop application following CSRFF grant application form and guidelines.

i) Must ensure Key Principles of Facility Provision.

ii) Must ensure relevant supporting documentation is considered.

iii) Must have considered items as per item 1. d) iii).

g) Completed application submitted to City of Wanneroo

i) Closing date for submissions to be no less than four (4) weeks prior to the date that applications are put to Council for approval.

h) CSRFF Review Panel formed to review applications.

i) Develop initial ranking & priority with rationale provided based on:

· CSRFF assessment & rating criteria.

· City of Wanneroo philosophy & exclusions

· Items as listed under item 1. d) iii).

i) Site tour of facilities with EMT & Councillors

j) Recommendations put to Council OCM – last OCM in October

k) Recommendations forwarded to DSR by end of October

Process Outline and Timeframe.

Stage	Process Element	June	July	August	September	October
1.	CSRFF Advertised
2.	CSRFF Workshop
3.	Distribution of Fact Sheet at the CSRFF workshop
4.	Potential applicants to discuss application with Co-ordinator Leisure Services
5.	City of Wanneroo Liaison Officer
6.	Develop CSRFF application
7.	Closing date for application to the City of Wanneroo
8.	City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Panel
9.	Site tour – Executive Management & Council.
10.	Recommendations to Council
11.	Applications forwarded to DSR

Internal Applications

In relation to the assessment of internal applications, the following process detail and timeframe has been identified.

Process Detail

a) Review of projects to be considered for CSRFF

i) Occur during the development of capital budget.

b) Determination of priority by internal assessment group.

i) Determination of priority based on established criteria.

· Level of need within the community

· Potential community benefit

· Addressing issues of risk

c) Identification and development of supporting documentation requirements

i) Needs Analysis

ii) Feasibility

iii) Management Plan

d) Develop application following CSRFF grant application form and guidelines.

i) Must ensure Key Principles of Facility Provision.

ii) Must ensure relevant supporting documentation is considered.

e) Submission of completed application.

i) Closing date for submissions to be no less than four (4) weeks prior to the date that applications are put to Council for approval.

f) CSRFF Review Panel formed to review applications.

i) Develop initial ranking & priority with rationale provided based on:

· CSRFF assessment & rating criteria.

· City of Wanneroo philosophy & exclusions

· Items as listed under item 1. d) iii).

g) Site tour of facilities with EMT & Councillors

h) Recommendations put to Council OCM – last OCM in October

i) Recommendations forwarded to DSR by end of October

Process Outline and Timeframe.

Stage	Process Element	Jan	Feb	Mar.	June	July	Aug.	Sept.	Oct.
1.	Review projects for CSRFF
2.	Determine priority – internal assessment group
3.	Identification & development of supporting documentation.
4.	Develop CSRFF application.
5.	Submission of completed application.
8.	City of Wanneroo CSRFF Review Panel
9.	Site tour – Executive Management & Council.
10.	Recommendations to Council
11.	Applications forwarded to DSR

2. ADOPTS the following philosophy and criteria for the assessment of internal and external Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund applications.

Philosophy

That any application being considered by the City of Wanneroo should:

· Meet a clearly demonstrated need within the community.

· Support the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan and Leisure Strategy

· Provide maximum benefit and value for money for the community by providing multi purpose facilities and allow for general community uses (i.e. other community-based activities).

· Be financially viable, with the applicant able to demonstrate the ability to meet the financial commitment.

· Increases participation in recreational activity within the City.

· Include a clear management plan, where appropriate.

· Meet all relevant Australian Standards.

Exclusions

The City of Wanneroo will not consider applications for:

· Deficit funding,

· Recurrent salaries or operational costs

· Non-fixed equipment

· Projects that have already commenced or been completed

· The purchase of land

· Provision of bar facilities

· Development of privately owned facilities

· Facility maintenance

· Clubs/organisations who have outstanding debts with the City, or are failing to meet financial obligations with the City.

and that this statement of philosophy and exclusion criteria be included within the

Planning Framework – Design and Development of Leisure and Community Facilities.

3. APPROVES Administration to give further consideration to the development of a separate process to consider requests for the City to provide capital funding for the provision of community infrastructure outside of the Department of Sport and Recreation’s Community Sport and Recreation Facility Fund.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 1

PROCESS FLOWCHART

EXTERNAL APPLICATIONS INTERNAL APPLICATIONS

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CD03-07/03 Community Representative Positions on the Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee

File Ref: PA9/0002V01

File Name: BACommunity Representative Positions On The Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee.doc This line will not be

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 09 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Philippa Rogers Date 09 June 2003printed dont delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

Author: Philippa Rogers

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the nominations received for the Community Representative positions to the Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee

Background

In the Terms of Reference for the Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee (W261-07/01) the membership of the committee includes six members of the community with an interest in the heritage of the City of Wanneroo. The Community members serve a two year term with the nominations called to coincide with the Ordinary Council elections for that year.

Detail

A call for nominations appeared in the 20-26 May issue of the Wanneroo Times, with nominations closing on 6 June 2003. Interested community members were asked to submit their interest in writing, outlining their relevant skills and experience.

The following nominations were received:

· Ms Gayle Chemielewski, Miss Margaret Cockman, Mrs Janet Gloudemans, Mrs Lola Gibbs and Mr Stan Daley expressed their interest in re-applying for the committee

· Mrs Margaret Gilchrist expressed an interest in joining the committee and cited her interest in the museum and other community work.

Comment

It should be noted that Janet Gloudemans, Lola Gibbs and Margaret Gilchrist are part-time employees of the City of Wanneroo, working as museum assistants at the Gloucester Lodge Museum

As Council has six nominations who have expressed an interest, it is recommended that they be appointed to the Committee up until May 2005, or earlier if the museum is closed prior to this date.

Statutory Compliance

Section 5.10 of the Local Government Act allows Council to appoint persons on Committees.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council APPOINTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Ms Gayle Chemielewski, Ms Margaret Cockman, Mr Stan Daley, Mrs Margaret Gilchrist, Mrs Janet Gloudemans and Ms Lola Gibbs as Community Representatives on the Gloucester Lodge Museum Advisory Committee for the period ending Saturday, 7 May 2005.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Ranger & Safety Services

CD04-07/03 Closure of Quinns Beach Car Park during Night Time Hours

File Ref: S/0064V01

File Name: CAClosure Of Quinns Beach Car Park During Night Time Hours.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 25 June 2003

Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Michael Barry

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To investigate the best option to reduce anti-social behaviour in Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks.

Background

Originating from the concerns of a number of residents located on Ocean Drive experiencing anti-social behaviour from youths gathering in the beachside car park, the Council considered a “Motion on Notice” from the Mayor at its meeting held 29 April 2003.

“The Council resolved to:

1. REQUEST Administration to immediately investigate the best option to reduce the anti-social behaviour in Ocean Drive and the car park leading from Ocean Drive and report their findings to Council.

2. LISTS for consideration in the 2003/04 Budget the design and public consultation relating to the redesign and traffic improvements (including the construction of a dual use pathway).

3. LISTS for consideration in the 2004/05 Budget the costs identified in Recommendation 2 above.”

Detail

At the time that the “Motion on Notice” was considered by the Council the Administration advised that it was proposing to undertake a comprehensive community consultation program and subsequently prepare a concept plan for the upgrading of Ocean Drive as a strategic capital works project for Quinns Rocks during 2003/04. It is then proposed that the associated works will be listed for consideration in the 2004/05 budget.

In the interim the beachside car park continues to be a source of grievance to local residents. Youth continue to frequent the car park particularly on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights using the venue to participate in burn-outs with vehicles and car racing in Ocean Drive. There is also evidence that the vegetation on the Ocean Drive side of the car park has been set alight together with bollards and some wooden furniture. Despite the efforts of the police and the Safer Citizen’s patrols, anti social behaviour continues to be prevalent requiring the police to organise two major joint operations, the first being at the Easter weekend and more recently Friday 13 June where a widely advertised 18^th birthday party at the car park location was averted.

Given the popularity of the venue for youth gatherings during night time hours consideration should be given to closing the car park during this time for a trial period of twelve months to evaluate the impact it may have on the reduction of local disturbances. An assessment of the potential to close the car park as a temporary solution to the problem identified that the installation of bollards at the entrance of the car park with some associated minor modification to the car park driveway can be achieved at an estimated cost of $6,000. Introducing this method of control will require a manual system of closing and opening the car park. It is anticipated that this function will be incorporated within the duties of the Rangers and/or the Safer Citizens Patrol Officers.

A further $1,000 will be required to undertake an extensive advertising campaign and to arrange suitable signage in the car park. The opening and closing times of the car park will vary according to demand during the winter and summer months. Also, should vehicles remain in the car park after the advertised closing times and patrons need to retrieve vehicles, then adherence to an introduced process will be required incorporating a prescribed call-out fee.

Consultation

Consultation will be undertaken with the Police, Surf Life Saving Club and other local recreation groups that may have an interest in accessing the car park particularly during the warmer months of the year.

Comment

The Council has requested that the Administration investigates the best option of reducing anti-social behaviour originating from the Quinns Beach Car Park during the night time. It is therefore suggested that consideration be given to the closing of the car park during the night time on a daily basis. In order to achieve this closure a total of $7,000 will need to be allocated in the 2003/04 financial year. Funding for this project can be made available from unspent monies allocated in Account 5151 ‘Urban Design Projects’ to be carried forward in the 2003/04 budget. The carried forward funds will provide for the implementation of bollards at the car park entrance, associated modification works, public advertising and appropriate signage.

Statutory Compliance

A further report will be required to establish opening and closing times for the car park and a prescribed fee for the retrieval of vehicles from the car park.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

It has been estimated that the necessary implementation works to secure the Quinns Beach car park during night time will be $7,000. Funding for this project can be made available from unspent monies allocated in Account 5151 ‘Urban Design Projects’ to be carried forward in the 2003/04 budget.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip – This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. SUBJECT to the City implementing a public consultation process with local residents and receiving broad support as deemed satisfactory by the Chief Executive Officer, approves the closure of Quinns Beach car park during night time hours for a trial period of twelve months; and

2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure of $7,000.00 carried forward into the 2003/04 budget against 51-80-82-827-5151-0001 ‘Urban Design Projects’ to implement the necessary work to secure the Quinns Beach car park.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Chief Executive Office

General

CE01-07/03 Resignation of Committee Membership - Festival and Cultural Events (Face) Advisory Committee

File Ref: S02/0021

File Name: AAResignation of Committee Membership Festival and Cultural Events Advisory Committee FACE .doc This line will not be

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 25 June 2003

Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003printed so do not delete

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Daniel Simms

Meeting Date: 1 July 2003

Attachments: Nil

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the nomination of an Elected Member to the Festival and Cultural Events (FACE) Advisory Committee as a result of the resignation of Cr Stewart from this Committee.

Background

At the Special Council Meeting on the 5^th May 2003 Council appointed the following Elected Members to the Festival and Cultural Events Advisory Committee:

“That Council appoint BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Councillors Hughes, Roberts, Salpietro, Newton, Pearson, Stewart and Treby as delegates and Mayor Kelly, plus Councillors Steffens, Blencowe, Goodenough, Cvitan, Monks, McNamara and Loftus as deputy delegates to the Festival and Cultural Events (FACE) Advisory Committee.”

Detail

Cr Stewart’s resignation is as a result of an inability to attend meetings at 4.00pm due to work commitments.

Festival and Cultural Events Advisory Committee meetings are held every 6 weeks on a Tuesday at 4.00pm in the Spinifex Room, Civic Centre.

The purpose of the Festival and Cultural Events Advisory Committee is to recommend to Council on policy matters pertaining to the promotion of the City’s culture.

Comment

Council is requested to consider the appointment of an Elected Member to replace the position held by Cr Stewart.

Statutory Compliance

Nil.

Strategic Implications

Representation on committees assist Council in achieving an understanding of our communities needs which support Council’s strategic goal under the theme Healthy Communities.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY APPOINT Cr _______________ to the Festival and Cultural Events (FACE) Advisory Committee.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE02-07/03 Appointment of Council Delegates to the AGM's of Western Australia Local Government Association

File Ref: 0003

File Name: CAAppointment of Council Delegates to the AGM s of Western Australia Local Government Association .doc This line will not

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 25 June 2003

Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

Author: Daniel Simms

Meeting Date: 01 July 2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider the appointment of Council delegates to the forthcoming AGM’s of the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) and the Local Government Association (LGA).

Background

The AGM’s for WALGA and LGA are scheduled for Sunday 03 August 2003 as part of the Local Government Week 2003. Council’s current delegates on the North Zone Committee of WALGA are:-

Cr Stewart

Cr Pearson

Cr Cvitan

Cr Loftus

Mayor Kelly (Deputy).

Council is required to formally nominate two (2) delegates for the WALGA AGM and four (4) delegates for the LGA AGM. These AGM’s are required by each Association’s respective constitution that takes place every year.

Comment

Council may wish to consider nominating the four current delegates on the WALGA North Zone as delegates for the LGA AGM and further select two delegates from the WALGA North Zone to represent Council at the WALGA AGM.

Section 5.10 of the Local Government Act 1995 (as amended) allows Council to appoint members to Committees by an Absolute Majority.

The Local Government Association AGM is a statutory AGM to conclude the future needs for the Local Government Association.

It is recommended that the two delegates for the WALGA AGM and the four delegates for the LGA AGM be selected from Council’s representatives on the WALGA North Zone.

Strategic Implications

Nil

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. APPOINT by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following elected members to represent Council at the Annual General Meeting of the Local Government Association to be held on Sunday 03 August 2003.

Cr Stewart

Cr Pearson

Cr Cvitan

Cr Loftus

Mayor Kelly (Deputy)

2. APPOINT by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following elected members to represent Council at the Annual General Meeting of the Western Australian Local Government Association to be held on Sunday 03 August 2003.

Cr _______________ & Cr _____________ with Cr _______________ (Deputy)

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE03-07/03 Policy and Local Laws Committee

File Ref: 12345

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: Nil

Author: Daniel Simms

Meeting Date: 01 July 2003

File Name: CAStrategic Policy Review Committee.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 19 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 19 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 19 June 2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To establish a Policy and Local Laws Committee under the powers given in Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 to develop and review Council’s policies and local laws.

Background

The development and review of Council’s policies is one of the key roles of an elected member. Whilst Council’s current meeting cycle allows for policy discussion to occur during regular Policy Forums, Council may wish to consider alternative ways of reviewing and developing policies to ensure that they remain current and address the principles of sound corporate governance.

Local Government is able to make local laws on a broad range of issues as they consider necessary to meet local circumstances and needs. The laws should not be inconsistent with the Local Government Act 1995 or any other written law. The Policy and Local Laws Committee will perform a key role in the development and review of the City’s Local Laws to ensure that they meet legislative requirements.

All local governments are required to review their local laws at least once in every eight years.

Detail

The objectives of the committee would be to ensure that Council’s policy direction supports the City’s strategic plan, meets Council’s compliance with legislative requirements and embraces the principle of sound corporate governance.

The committee would also participate in the development and review of local laws to ensure that they meet Council’s strategic direction and obligations in relation to accessibility, statutory obligations and competition implications.

The committee would forward recommendations on policies and local laws to Council for consideration and adoption. The Committee is not a decision-making forum and is therefore not open to members of the public.

Comment

The Committee should meet at least once every six weeks and Council may wish to consider holding Policy Forums every six weeks as well. It is therefore suggested that the Policy Forum be retitled to Council Forum and alternate with the Policy and Local Laws Committee meetings.

Statutory Compliance

Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act allows Council to establish committees.

Section 5.9 of the Local Government Act allows Council to form committees comprised of council members, employees and other persons.

Section 5.10 of the Local Government Act requires appointment of persons on committees to be by absolute majority of Council.

Strategic Implications

The development of a Policy and Local Laws Committee is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan in the areas of Corporate Management and Development: 4.1 “Review and Develop policies covering governance and management of our City”.

Voting Requirements

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council,:-

1. ESTABLISH BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, a Policy and Local Laws Committee to develop and review Council’s strategic policies and local laws and APPOINT the Mayor and four elected members to the committee being:-

a)_________________,

b) ________________,

c)_________________,

d) ________________.

2. ADOPT the following Terms of Reference for the Policy and Local Laws Committee:-

Terms of Reference

Introduction

The Council of the City of Wanneroo (“the Council”) establishes this committee under the powers given in Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995, the committee to be known as the Policy and Local Laws Committee (the “Committee”).

The Council appoints to the Committee those persons whose names appear in Section 4.0 below. Membership of the Committee shall, unless otherwise specified, be for a term ceasing on the first Saturday in May in the year that the City’s local government elections are held, after which time the Council may appoint members for a further term.

The Committee shall act for and on behalf of Council in accordance with provisions of the Local Government Act 1995.

Name

The name of the Committee is the Policy and Local Laws Committee.

Objectives:-

a) To participate in the development and review of Council policy to ensure Council’s policy direction supports the City’s strategic plan, meets Council’s compliance with legislative requirements and embraces the principle of sound corporate governance.

b) To participate in the development and review requirements for local laws to ensure that Council Local Laws meet Council’s strategic direction, and also meets Council’s obligations in relation to accessibility, statutory obligations and competition implications.

Tasks:-

a) Providing advice to Council regarding review priorities for local laws and strategic policies.

b) Advising Council on strategic issues or anomalies in the current operations of local laws and strategic policies.

c) Reviewing on a half yearly basis progress on and effect of nominated local laws and strategic policies as referred to it from time to time by Council.

Membership

Elected Members: Mayor and 4 elected members.

Council Officers (non voting members): Chief Executive Officer, Manager Strategic & Executive Services, other staff as determined by the Chief Executive Officer.

Presiding Member

The Committee shall appoint a Presiding Member and Deputy Presiding Member to conduct its business. The Presiding Member shall ensure that minutes of the proceedings are kept and that business is conducted in accordance with the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders. The CEO or delegated nominee will attend the first meeting to conduct the election of the Presiding Member or at a subsequent meeting if a new Presiding Member is to be elected.

Meetings

a) The Committee shall meet once every six weeks on a Tuesday evening commencing at 6.00pm.

b) Notice of meetings including an agenda shall be given to members at least 3 days prior to each meeting.

c) If any member is absent from 3 consecutive meetings without leave of the Committee or Council, they shall forfeit their position on such Committee. The Council shall be informed, and the Council may appoint a replacement for the balance of the Committee’s term of appointment.

d) The Presiding Member shall ensure that detailed minutes of all meetings are kept and shall, not later than 5 days after each meeting provide the members and Council with a copy of such minutes.

e) All Elected Members of the Committee shall have one vote. If the vote of the members present is equally divided, the person presiding can cast a second vote.

f) The Committee is not a decision-making forum and is therefore not open to members of the public.

Quorum

Quorum for a meeting shall be at least 50% of the number of offices, whether vacant or not. A decision of the Committee does not have effect unless it has been made by a simple majority.

Delegated Powers

The Committee has no specific powers under the Local Government Act and is to advise and make recommendations to Council only.

Termination of Committee

Termination of the Committee shall be:

a) in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995; or

b) at the direction of Council.

Officer(s) responsible for Management of Committee

Manager Strategic & Executive Services

3. RENAME the Policy Forum to the Council Forum to be held every six weeks.

4. NOTES that the first meeting of the Council Forum will be held on
08 July 2003 and the first meeting of the Policy and Local Laws Committee be held on 29 July 2003 and thereafter every six weeks alternatively, or as otherwise required.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

CE04-07/03 Cooperation Agreement between Tokyu Corporation & the City of Wanneroo

File Ref: S36/0008V01

File Name: AACooperation Agreement Between Tokyu Corporation the City of Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete

Level 5 Approval by Y. Heath Date 25 June 2003

Level 4 Approval by Charles Johnson Date 18 June 2003

Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by Y. Heath Date 17 June 2003

Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Attachments: 3

Author: Charles Johnson

Meeting Date: 10 June 2003

StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete

Issue

To consider a proposal for the further development of cooperation processes between Tokyu Corporation (Yanchep Sun City) and the City of Wanneroo.

Background

The St Andrews project located around Yanchep and Two Rocks is four times larger than any other urban development in Australia. The Tokyu Corporation owns 4,352ha of land within the Project Area.

The vision for the St Andrews Project is for a “dynamic hub of excellence recognized globally as a leading example of regional sustainability in a coastal setting. A place where the community and economy prospers in an enviable environment nestled between the Indian Ocean and Yanchep National Park”.

In July 1999, Tokyu Corporation, Yanchep Sun City, the Western Australian State Government, Western Australian Planning Commission and the City of Wanneroo signed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement to explore an innovative, integrative approach to: -

· Collaborative Private Public Sector Partnering in City Planning and Economic Development;

· Urban Development based on Best Practice New Urbanism; and

· Cluster based Economic Development to create employment opportunities.

The Agreement is reproduced in Attachment 1.

Tokyu Corporation has now submitted (April 2003) for the assessment of the City of Wanneroo, a Structure Plan for the Capricorn Coastal Village that covers 201 hectares, located between Yanchep and the northern edge of Club Capricorn.

The key features of the plan are:

· 2,615 residential lots with density codes for R5 to R80;

· Centre Zones (Coastal, Village and Corridor) 14,000m² retail and
38,000 m²commercial space;

· Mixed use zones to facilitate home based business;

· 9.9 hectare Aged Care site for a 130 bed aged care facility and approximately 200 independent living units;

· 18.4 ha of public open space; and

· Two primary school sites and a community facility site.

The structure plan caters for 7,600 people with a workforce of 2,280 (net self-sufficiency ratio of 60%). The Village Structure Plan is the subject of a separate report to Council. The Structure Plan has been identified as the first stage of Tokyu Corporation’s land development program and the first stage of the economic development component.

As the St Andrews Project has reached a critical phase in its planning and development it is considered appropriate that the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation expand the range of matters considered under the existing Cooperation Agreement. The objective is to provide for more detailed and direct involvement of the City with the Tokyu Corporation in the context of the existing and future development of the project area.

Details

The Chief Executive Officer of the City of Wanneroo has in consultation with the Tokyu Corporation prepared a Discussion Paper detailing the potential for an expansion of the cooperation processes between the Tokyu Corporation and the City. The Discussion Paper is included as Attachment 2. In general, it proposes that the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation agree to:

1. Continuing to actively participate in the implementation and review of the existing Strategic Co‑operation Agreement;

2. Developing and maintaining strong lines of communication in order to ensure that the vision can be achieved as quickly and efficiently possible;

3. Agreeing to work together on the Smart Growth initiatives of the City;

4. Agreeing to develop and coordinate social and community development programs to meet the unmet needs of the existing community as well as the incoming community;

5. Agreeing that the Tokyu Corporation in consultation with the City of Wanneroo will prepare by agreed dates:

· A District Concept Plan;

· A District Structure Plan with related urban design plans; and

· A local economic development and employment strategy

That the City of Wanneroo will give consideration to supporting the lodgement of a Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment that seeks to resolve the alignment of major transport infrastructure as expressed in the District Structure Plan;

6. Agreeing to work together to develop plans covering the staging of development and the provision of regional and local infrastructure

Each of the general points of cooperation is expressed through a number of more specific proposals, which are set out in the recommendations of this report.

One of the key recommendations is the establishment of a committee of Council and senior executives from the Tokyu Corporation, which would provide a forum for coordinating and discussing the various aspects of the cooperation process. The Terms of Reference for the committee are detailed in Attachment 3.

Consultation

A copy of the Discussion Paper has been provided to Tokyu Corporation and advice has been received that they are in general agreement with the proposal.

Comment

The proposal for enhanced cooperation processes as detailed in the Discussion Paper is seen to have a number of benefits including:

1. The establishment of a formal Council committee as a channel for communication and dialogue with Tokyu. Issues which have been of concern to Council and the community, can be raised, and where appropriate, made public.

2. The expanded cooperation processes have a greater capacity to deal with issues that are important to the existing community in addition to planning for future residents.

3. Providing a framework for Tokyu Corporation’s direct involvement in Council’s Smart Growth strategies and the Regional Stewardship model.

4. Provides a forum for discussing proposals that could be presented to the Government in relation to regional infrastructure matters including the development of the railway, extension of Marmion Avenue and broadband telecommunications.

If Council adopts the general proposals contained in the Discussion Paper, it is anticipated that they would be incorporated into a Memorandum of Understanding between Council and the Tokyu Corporation. The details of the Memorandum would be negotiated through the Chief Executive Officer and reported back to Council if changes to the document were required.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The expansion of cooperation arrangements for the Tokyu Corporation will support the implementation of key goals and strategies contained in the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2002-2005:

“Goal One

Environmental Sustainability

To value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of our City

Goal Two

Healthy Communities

To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and provision of quality services and infrastructure

Goal Three

Economic Development

To maximise opportunities for balanced economic growth and development within the City”

The very large scale of the St Andrews Project enables three of the goals of the Strategic Plan to be brought together to achieve more balanced growth in terms of environment, social and economic elements.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements:

Absolute Majority

EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete

Recommendation

That Council:-

1. CONFIRMS its continued participation in the Strategic Co-operation Agreement and the process review.

2. ENDORSES the current representation on the Strategic Implementation Group and the Executive Level Committee for the St Andrews Project.

3. ADOPTS the Terms of Reference for the Establishment of the St Andrews Project Advisory Committee as detailed in Attachment 3.

4. APPOINTS by an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following members to the St Andrews Project Advisory Committee:

· Mayor Kelly

· Cr Loftus

· Cr McNamara

· Chief Executive Officer

· Director, Planning & Development

· Three representatives from Tokyu Corporation.

5. ENTERS into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Tokyu Corporation, which provides agreement on the following:

a) That the Tokyu Corporation actively supports Council’s Smart Growth initiative and agrees to fully participate in the project including representation on any Regional Stewardship Group that is established;

b) That the Tokyu Corporation and the City of Wanneroo coordinate social and community infrastructure development programs, so that they can meet the needs of the existing community in addition to that which is incoming;

c) That the City of Wanneroo with the support of the Tokyu Corporation engage the State Government and the community in strategies which are designed to address the problems of social disadvantage in the Two Rocks Yanchep area;

d) That the City of Wanneroo will use its best endeavours to progress the Capricorn Coastal Village Structure Plan as efficiently as possible whilst recognising that these matters are subject to normal statutory and business feasibility processes;

e) That the Tokyu Corporation agree to the preparation of a District Structure Plan covering all of the landholding;

f) That as the first step in the Structure Plan process, a Concept Plan will be lodged with Council within one month;

g) That the District Structure Plan is to be submitted to the City within 12 months of the lodgement of the Concept Plan, subject to sufficient information being provided by the State Government on the future alignment and nature of the railway proposed through the Project Area. The City will have as a target the advertising of the draft Structure Plan within a further three months following lodgement;

h) That the Tokyu Corporation agrees that it will not prepare any additional local Structure Plans involving, as a primary focus, residential development, until the District Structure Plan is lodged with the City of Wanneroo;

i) That the City of Wanneroo will give consideration to supporting the lodgement of a Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment that seeks to resolve the alignment of major transport infrastructure as expressed in the District Structure Plan;

j) That the Tokyu Corporation in consultation with the City of Wanneroo prepare an economic development strategy which expands the IDEAS project to incorporate additional local initiatives in order to expand employment opportunities for the existing community. The local initiatives could include:

i) Performing an advocacy role and pursuing funding;

ii) Developing partnerships with local businesses, associations and stakeholders; and

iii) Encouraging the development of small business centres for the region; and

iv) Encouraging and supporting existing and new tourism initiatives and promote Wanneroo as a day stop destination.

k) That the Tokyu Corporation agree to submit an expanded employment strategy to the City of Wanneroo by December 2003. This Strategy will be linked to the implementation programs already being undertaken through the IDEAS Project and Quick Wins Program;

l) That the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation ask the State Government for the development of a Regional Economic Development Strategy which is aimed at attracting regional infrastructure and business investment in the Wanneroo region;

m) That the Tokyu Corporation agrees to work with the City of Wanneroo to ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the provision of regional and local infrastructure, and that suitable arrangements are adopted for its provision should land be sold to third parties;

n) That the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation agree to negotiate with the State Government and other landowners to the south of Yanchep with the objective of having Marmion Avenue connected to Yanchep by 2005-2006; and

o) That the Tokyu Corporation as a matter of urgency investigates the connection of St Andrews to other parts of the metropolitan area via a broadband network.

6. AUTHORISE the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer of the City of Wanneroo to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Tokyu Corporation based on the contents of Part 5 of the Council Resolution.

EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 2

D R A F T

DEVELOPING COOPERATION PROCESSES BETWEEN TOKYU CORPORATION (YANCHEP SUN CITY) AND THE CITY OF WANNEROO

DISCUSSION PAPER PREPARED BY CHARLES JOHNSON, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CITY OF WANNEROO

1 INTRODUCTION

The St Andrews project located around Yanchep and Two Rocks is four times larger than any other urban development in Australia. The Tokyu Corporation owns 4,352ha of land within the Project Area.

The vision for St Andrews Project is for a “dynamic hub of excellence recognized globally as a leading example of regional sustainability in a coastal setting. A place where the community and economy prospers in an enviable environment nestled between the Indian Ocean and Yanchep National Park”.

It is proposed that the Tokyu Corporation and the City of Wanneroo implement the vision by:

1. Continuing to actively participate in the implementation and review of the existing Strategic Co‑operation Agreement;

2. Developing and maintaining strong lines of communication in order to ensure that the vision can be achieved as quickly and efficiently possible;

3. Agreeing to work together on the Smart Growth initiatives of the City;

4. Agreeing to develop and coordinate social and community development programs to meet the unmet needs of the existing community as well as the incoming community;

5. Agreeing that the Tokyu Corporation in consultation with the City of Wanneroo will prepare by agreed dates:

· A District Concept Plan;

· A District Structure Plan with related urban design plans; and

· A local economic development and employment strategy

The City of Wanneroo will give consideration to supporting the lodgement of a proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) amendment relating to the alignment of transport infrastructure as expressed in the District Concept Plan.

6. Agreeing to work together to develop plans covering the staging of development and the provision of regional and local infrastructure.

2 CO-OPERATION ARRANGEMENTS

2.1 Strategic Co-operation Agreement 1999

In July 1999, Tokyu Corporation, Yanchep Sun City, the Western Australian State Government, Western Australian Planning Commission and the City of Wanneroo signed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement (Attachment 1) to explore an innovative, integrative approach to: -

· Collaborative Private Public Sector Partnering in City Planning and Economic Development;

· Urban Development based on Best Practice New Urbanism; and

· Cluster based Economic Development to create employment opportunities.

The goals of the project contained in the St Andrews Agreement have two key elements:

1. The development of the St Andrews holding generally will be based on the following potential outcomes:

· Around 55 000 serviced residential lots with a population of some
148 000;

· 50 000 – 60 000 jobs with the first thousand over the next five years;

· Regional strategic commercial centre; and

· Approximately 1600 hectares of regional open space on land already seeded for this use along the Indian Ocean foreshore and extensions of the Yanchep National Park.

2. The development of land should proceed in a manner, which is:

· Environmentally, socially and economically sustainable;

· Recognizes and uses worlds best practices in urban design wherever possible;

· Accords with relevant State and local government policies; and

· Places a high priority on encouragement of public transport use

The Strategic Co-operation Agreement identified five Strategic Projects:

1. Retrofit of Two Rocks Town Centre;

2. Continue Redevelopment of Two Rocks Marina;

3. Employment Creation through the IDEAS Project Feasibility Study;

4. Commencement of Residential Development; and

5. Preparation of Access Study.

In respect to the first two projects it needs to be acknowledged that there is still considerable work to be done to fulfill the expectations of the City and the community. These projects have been the centrepiece of the development of Two Rocks and need to be upgraded. It is anticipated that these issues will be addressed as part of the ongoing implementation of the Co-operation Agreement.

The Co-operation Agreement also allows Tokyu to self-fund the project by selling off non-strategic land parcels. The selling of Lot 201 (Rural living site) and Lot 1 (former Atlantis Marine Park site) has been part of that program.

The structure plan for North Two Rocks and the subsequent subdivision into super lots for sale is a continuation of the program.

The Co-operation Agreement established a Strategic Implementation Group (SIG) to meet on a regular basis to coordinate the implementation of the Agreement.

The current membership of the group is:

· Director General, Department for Planning and Infrastructure (or representative);

· Director General, Department of Industry and Resources formally Technology (or representative);

· Project Manager, Department of the Premier and Cabinet;

· Chief Executive Officer, City of Wanneroo;

· Member for Wanneroo (Co-Chair); and

· Senior Representative, Tokyu Corporation (Co-Chair).

The State Government has established an executive level committee comprising the Premier, the Chief representative of the Tokyu Corporation and the Mayor of the City of Wanneroo to meet two or three times a year to oversee the project.

The Co-operation Agreement is to make arrangements for co-operation during the feasibility stage of the Project. It anticipates that, as work on the Project progresses and in the light of operating experience, there will be a need to consider modifying the co-operation arrangements or making new ones. Part 7 requires that the Agreement be reviewed every five years from the date of its endorsement and Part 2 foreshadows future detailed agreements relating to the implementation of jointly agreed initiatives.

The SIG believes that it would now be appropriate for it to undertake a review under Part 7 and for consideration to be given through the review to the need for detailed arrangements for the implementation of the Project. It notes that the completion of the review is required to be made no later than July 2004 and, in view of the complexity of the work involved, suggests that it be commenced as soon as possible.

It is appropriate that the City of Wanneroo and Tokyu establish a Joint Committee to ensure that there is strong levels of communication relating to the St Andrews Project. The Committee would act as an advisor to both the Council and to the Tokyu Corporation on matters of common interest.

The Committee would be established under s.5.8 of the Local Government Act (1995) and involve the Mayor, the two North Ward Councillors, the Chief Executive Officer and three representatives from Tokyu Corporation. The Terms of Reference for the Committee would be agreed between the parties with administrative support being provided by Council Administration.

Proposal

1. That the City of Wanneroo confirms its continued participation in the Strategic Co-operation Agreement and the process review;

2. That the City of Wanneroo endorses the current representation on the Strategic Implementation Group and the Executive Level Committee for the St Andrews Project; and

3. That the City of Wanneroo and Tokyu establish a joint advisory committee involving the Mayor, Ward Councillors’ and Chief Executive Officer along with senior representatives of Tokyu Corporation to ensure that there are strong levels of communication.

2.2 Smart Growth Policy and Regional Stewardship

The City of Wanneroo is preparing a Smart Growth strategy, which integrates environmental, economic and social elements to guide the future development of the City of Wanneroo. The strategy is being linked to Council’s Strategic Plan and existing initiatives in planning and community development.

The strategy will help ensure that all the key areas of growth management are addressed in the assessment of development proposals. It covers both established and emerging suburbs and centres of development.

The integrated performance criteria for smart growth include a number of factors such as:

Social

· Improve the liveability (safety, convenience, comfort, aesthetics) of the areas;

· Increase opportunities for social interaction and provide a focus for the community;

· Contribute to the area’s natural, cultural and historical heritage;

· Make a wide range of services and facilities more accessible to all;

· Relate well to surrounding development, land use and landscapes;

· Meet the need of all segments of the population;

· Maintain or improve transport choice for all; and

· Maintain or improve public health.

Economic

· Contribute to economic competitiveness of the network of centres that provide wide community benefit;

· Promote urban forms that minimise overall land and transport requirements;

· Ensure more efficient use of land and provision of infrastructure;

· Improve freight movement and business logistics; and

· Improve business and employment opportunities.

Environmental

· Protect valuable areas of urban bushland, wetlands and coastlines;

· Encourage the development of urban transport systems that will limit pollution from fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions;

· Improve energy efficient building design and layout;

· Limit the amount of waste generated for disposal off-site;

· Increase water conservation, including water-sensitive urban design; and

· Control noise emissions to achieve reasonable levels near sensitive uses.

The City cannot implement a Smart Growth Strategy for Wanneroo on its own. Partnerships need to be formed and the best ideas of the public and private sectors and the community need to be implemented and demonstrated through real life projects. A number of models have been developed to guide this process. One such model is that of Regional Stewardship developed by the Alliance for Regional Stewardship in the United States.

Regional Stewardship has been defined by Doug Henton from Collaborative Economics, as the ‘commitment of regional leaders to place’. It is about residents, businesses, government, educational institutions and community organizations acting as a network of responsibility. The basic values underlying Stewardship are that of wanting to create broad prosperity, a healthy attractive environment and inclusive communities for the next generation and us. The essence of regional Stewardship is taking responsibility to ensure that we pass on a better place to our children.

Proposal

1. That the Tokyu Corporation actively supports Council’s Smart Growth initiative and agrees to fully participate in the project including representation on any Regional Stewardship Group that is established.

2.3 Community Engagement

In order to ensure that the vision and goals for the project are delivered the following principles have been formulated by the Tokyu Corporation to guide the culture of the project team during the planning, development and implementation phases of the project:

· Create a vital and involved community;

· Invest in community development;

· Develop a good quality of life;

· Excel in endeavour;

· Appreciate natural heritage in the planning process;

· Have an effective and responsive governance process;

· Make the area accessible and affordable;

· Create a net positive effect;

· Create a socially responsible development;

· Foster a strong cultural identity;

· Develop and encourage quality built form; and

· Facilitate advanced infrastructure.

The Tokyu Corporation is seeking to progress these guiding principles through collaboration and involvement of the local community, social service agencies, business and government.

During the development phase of the project, Tokyu will be an active participant in the community by commencing a series of initiatives aimed at building the capacity of the local community.

Community Development initiatives relating to the project have been divided into two phases. The first phase involves engagement with the existing community to ensure that their aspirations are expressed and catered for in the planning process. The second phase revolves around working with the incoming community to create an enviable place to be that compliments the existing community and the local environment.

A number of specific community development initiatives are proposed to be enacted over the life of the project. These include:

· Maintaining newsletters and information lines to ensure the community is kept informed of the project’s progress;

· Conducting regular workshops with the local community;

· Running a series of community events and activities to activate the public realm;

· Employment and business attraction strategies;

· Development of community based ecological restoration projects; and

· Capacity building local community groups and sporting associations.

To further develop the above initiatives Tokyu is proposing to undertake the following community development activities over the next year:

· Undertake a community audit;

· Develop a Community Development Plan for Capricorn Coastal Village;

· Formulate an interim community action plan for 2003-2004; and

· Develop a community facilities framework for Capricorn Coastal Village and the adjoining landholdings.

The City of Wanneroo has its own Community Development programs based in the Two Rocks Yanchep area. These initiatives are designed to build the capacity of the community through a range of initiatives including provision of community facilities, the coordination of recreation and community programs in addition to festival events and safer citizens programs.

It is acknowledged that the Two Rocks Yanchep area is an area of special need in respect to social and community development. Higher levels of unemployment combined with a lack of adequate services including: medical support, public transport and higher education have resulted in unacceptable levels of social disadvantage. The City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation need to work with the State Government and the community to address these problems.

Proposal

1. That the Tokyu Corporation and the City of Wanneroo coordinate social and community infrastructure development programs, so that they can meet the needs of the existing community in addition to that which is incoming.

2. That the City of Wanneroo with the support of the Tokyu Corporation engage the State Government and the community in strategies which are designed to address the problems of social disadvantage in the Two Rocks Yanchep area.

3 STRUCTURE PLANS

3.1 Southern Workshop and Capricorn Coastal Village Structure Plans

One of the five strategic projects of the Strategic Co-operation Agreement was a feasibility study to assess the possibility of Lots 301, 302, 303 and 304 being developed to provide a supply of residential lots – an area known as the Southern Project.

A non-binding Enquiry by Design workshop for the Southern Project Area was held in March 2002 with the following aims:

· Address/review regional context and infrastructure;

· Address/review district context and infrastructure for the St Andrews Area;

· Prepare a concept plan over the Southern Project (approximately 1,000 ha);

· Address/review transportation infrastructure (particularly the railway alignment) relative to the Two Rocks Local Structure Plan; and

· Integrate existing communities into the proposed expansion.

The guiding philosophy of the Workshop was to create an urban context and structure, which is based on the principles of the State’s Liveable Neighbourhoods Code with a strong emphasis on transit based employment and the aim of achieving an ultimate population of 150,000 people with 60-70% self-sufficiency in jobs was adopted as a target.

The key outcome of the Workshop was a St Andrews Conceptual Framework Plan along with an alternative option. Although there were many similarities with Regional Structure Plan, the workshop concluded that the sub regional structure for St Andrews should be further refined in order to better blend the qualities of both plans in the future.

The key features of the plan are:

· 2,615 residential lots with density codes for R5 to R80;

· Centre Zones (Coastal, Village and Corridor) 14,000m² retail and
38,000 m²commercial space;

· Mixed use zones to facilitate home based business;

· 9.9 hectare Aged Care site for a 130 bed aged care facility and approximately 200 independent living units;

· 18.4 ha of public open space; and

· Two primary school sites and a community facility site.

The structure plan caters for 7,600 people with a workforce of 2,280 (net self-sufficiency ratio of 60%).

Proposal

1. The City of Wanneroo will use its best endeavours to progress the Capricorn Coastal Village Structure Plan as efficiently as possible whilst recognizing that these matters are subject to normal statutory and business feasibility processes.

3.2 Preparation of a District Concept Plan, Structure Plan and Metropolitan Scheme Amendment

The implementation of the vision for the St Andrews project requires a very high level of coordination and planning integration. The scale of the project over 6,800 hectares provides an opportunity for the creation of a community of nearly 150,000 people.

A District (or Regional) Structure Plan is needed to guide the development and to help ensure its best practice objectives can be achieved. As the first step in the preparation of the Structure Plan agreement needs to be reached on a Concept proposal. This is necessary in order to test assumptions about the nature of future public transport corridors and associated land uses.

Conceptual plans for the project prepared by Calthorpe and Associates for the Tokyu Corporation indicate that the project will be made up of a variety of different neighbourhood types anchored by a series of village and town centre activity nodes and knitted together by a mixed use transit corridor.

The Tokyu Corporation will submit to both the City of Wanneroo and to the State Government, the Calthorpe Concept Plans as the first stage in the District Structure planning process. These plans will be supplemented where required (by the City) with additional information sufficient for the City to make an appropriate level of assessment and determination.

The Concept Plans will be lodged within one month and a response from the City of Wanneroo will be provided as soon as practicable depending on the extent of involvement of State Government agencies, but in any event, will be no longer than six months.

It is expected that the Tokyu Corporation will work with the City of Wanneroo and the State Government to resolve any outstanding issues relating to the planning proposals including such matters as:

· The nature of the transport corridors and the type of public transport system to be adopted;

· The nature and location of retail centers;

· The range, location and density of housing forms; and

· The type and nature of commercial and industrial activities to be accommodated in the Plan.

The Concept Plan will lead directly to preparation of a District Structure Plan and amendments to the MRS. A formal District Structure Plan will be lodged within one year of the commencement of the process described above.

The District Structure Plan for the whole project needs to comply with the provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (Part 9).

The contents of the Structure Plan will need to be agreed with the City but it is likely that it will include but not be limited to the following:

· Site description and analysis;

· Existing statutory and planning framework;

· Design rationale;

· Traffic and Transport assessment including major road hierarchy modelling, function and character of each major road type, staging, proposals for public transport (rail alignment, station location and function, bus routes etc), bicycle and pedestrian networks (including crossings location and type);

· Centres Strategy, incorporating modelling, retail floor space and justification for location, size and composition of all regional, district, neighbourhood and other centres such as rail precincts, beach nodes etc.;

· Population and Housing Strategy including principles, target yields, densities and distribution;

· Proposals for major community, education (public and private) and recreational facilities;

· Services and Infrastructure;

· Environmental considerations, including those addressing local bushland and landform conservation and those required to comply with Environmental Conditions (refer Schedule 12 of DPS2 and Minister’s Statement);

· Preparation of management plans for Bushland and Coastal Reserve Areas;

· Archaeological, ethnographic and heritage assessments;

· Developer contribution mechanisms for development and maintenance of infrastructure;

· Mobile telephone base station location strategy;

· Framework for Smart Growth indicators; and

· Implementation strategy, including appropriate statutory section for DSP document, implications for MRS and DPS2 zonings.

Due to the large scale and long term nature of the project the structure plan will need to maintain a degree of flexibility and it is acknowledged that it will be subject to amendment processes.

As the District Structure Plan is considered to be a critical element of the overall planning process an agreement should be reached that until this plan is prepared no new local structure plans should be prepared, other than those currently lodged with Council.

Proposal

1. That the Tokyu Corporation agree to the preparation of a District Structure Plan covering all of the landholding;

2. That as the first step in the District Structure Plan process, a Concept Plan will be lodged with Council within one month;

3. That the District Structure Plan is to be submitted to the City within 12 months of the lodgement of the Concept Plan, subject to sufficient information being provided by the State Government on the future alignment and nature of the railway proposed through the Project Area. The City will have as a target the advertising of the draft Structure Plan within a further three months following lodgement.

4. That the Tokyu Corporation agrees that it will not prepare any additional local Structure Plans involving as a primary focus residential development until the District Structure Plan is lodged with the City of Wanneroo.

5. The City of Wanneroo will give consideration to supporting the lodgement of a proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) amendment relating to the alignment of transport infrastructure as expressed in the District Concept Plan.

4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

4.1 The Innovation, Development, Employment, Application Strategy (IDEAS) Project

The provision of 50,000 to 60,000 jobs at St Andrews is a key component of the project as outlined in the Strategic Co-operation Agreement. It is also anticipated that some 1,000 of these jobs will be provided in the first five years from 2003 when the IDEAS project gets underway.

The objectives of the IDEA Project are to:

· Make an assessment of the possibility of sufficient suitable potential employers;

· Develop a framework and strategy to create a favourable and financially attractive environment to attract preferred industries to locate their businesses within the boundaries of an identified area of the property in an enterprise zone, science city or the like;

· Provide employment opportunities through the creation of 1,000 positions between 2003 and 2008; and

· Address the financial viability of the implementation of such a proposal.

The target Employment Self Sufficiency ratio (ESS) has been set at 60%, with the most recent calculations provided by the Tokyu Corporation being as follows:

Ultimate population = 150,000

Ultimate dwellings/households = 55,000

Estimated population in workforce

@1.2 jobs/household = 66,000

72% self containment = 47,520 jobs

60% self sufficiency = 39,600 jobs

Tokyu Corporation and the City of Wanneroo recognize the numerous benefits and ultimate infrastructure cost savings of generating local employment. It is noted however that the current calculations fall short of the figures included in the Cooperation Agreement and that the issue will need to be addressed.

There are two components to the current employment strategy:

1) ensure adequate allocation of land industry, commerce, tourism and other uses;

2) introduce and implement strategies for attracting economic development and employment to the St Andrews area.

In May 1999 the SIG held a seminar to commence the economic development process (IDEAS Project) by identifying possible development options, primarily in relation to types of commercial activities that the St Andrews region might seek to attract.

An initial indication of the types of commercial activities that the region could attract due to its comparative and competitive advantages suggested clusters of related activities in the following categories:

· Knowledge-based employment generators;

· Environmental research and activities;

· Tertiary education linkages;

· Health and medicine;

· Tourism and lifestyle activities; and

· Value-adding to primary and other products.

The Quick Wins component of the IDEAS Project is concerned with securing employment opportunities at St Andrews through the creation of 1,000 positions between 2003 and 2008 which are additional to those provided in the normal way in retail service and support areas.

The work has followed a business process as follows:

· Assemble data on particular targets;

· Selection interview of targets;

· Memorandum of Understanding;

· Head of Agreement to test compliance; and

· Legal Agreement.

Quick Wins has produced to-date a provisional commitment of 120 jobs within the next three years with a further three to four hundred being the subject of ongoing discussions with five other prospects. No sites have yet been created, but the first of these commitments is dependent on the creation of a site through the subdivision and development of the Southern Precinct Capricorn Coastal Village.

4.2 City of Wanneroo Economic Development Strategy and Employment Strategy

Economic Development for the City of Wanneroo is about stimulation and support for business growth, generating new local employment opportunities, investment attraction and improving living standards.

Overall employment levels in the North West Corridor have lagged significantly behind population growth. The result has been an increasingly unsustainable reliance on long distance commuting and increasing congestion on the freeways of Perth. The number of jobs as a percentage of the resident workforce has declined from 35% in 1991 to less than 25% in 2001.

Targeted action is also required in areas experiencing particular difficulties including the Two Rocks Yanchep area, which has one of the highest levels of unemployment in the metropolitan area at more that 20%.

The City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan recognizes the importance of economic development with the following goal:

“The City is committed to maximizing opportunities for balanced economic growth and development for the enrichment of the region. The number one priority is to create local jobs and attract business opportunities that benefit the community”.

The City of Wanneroo is now in the process of preparing the following documents:

1. Economic Development Strategy – involving internal and external consultation that will allow many project directions and sub-policies to be initiated.

2. Employment Policy – a policy that invites relevant stakeholders, including land developers, to shape how employment-generating mechanisms can be put in place at the local structure plan level for new larger subdivisions.

The City is promoting a partnership approach with all key stakeholders that is led by a commitment that growth in some parts of the City should never be to the detriment of services and resources within the established and highly populated suburbs.

The broader targets for the period 2003-2007 are:

a) Reduction of the local unemployment rate (currently at 6.5% City wide) closer to the Perth metropolitan average (currently 4.8%); and

b) Increase participation in the workforce (the measure of social inclusion) from 72% to 76%, (which is the national average)

In Wanneroo some 25% - 30% of jobs are generated locally and are population driven. Another 20% are in regional centres and 18% in the CBD. The remaining 32% of jobs are potentially local, given encouragement through the right policies and settings. It is these jobs and those in future regional centres (St Andrews and Alkimos) that form the target of Council’s Employment Strategies along with those that can be created.

Some of the key components of the Economic Strategies and Employment Policy include: the identification and support of existing and new industries; the encouragement of local employment growth: and the development of local tourism industry. To bring about these objectives a range of actions could be taken:

· Conducting a business audit to gather information regarding industry types, infrastructure needs, and the relative Strengths Weaknesses, Opportunities and Constraints associated with locating a business in the municipality;

· Providing support for business training programmes;

· Facilitating the provision of suitable land and infrastructure through Structure Plan provisions;

· Performing an advocacy role and pursuing funding;

· Developing partnerships with local businesses, associations and stakeholders;

· Encouraging the development of small business centres for the region;

· Pursuing a diversity of employment opportunities;

· Developing an employment model in collaboration with industry and government which links growth to jobs; and

· Encouraging and supporting existing and new tourism initiatives and promote Wanneroo as a day stop destination.

The City of Wanneroo is hoping that the State Government will lead in the preparation of a Regional Economic Development Strategy for the northwest corridor. This Strategy has been discussed in the context of the SIG meetings but is yet to be agreed to by Government. The Strategy would be aimed at attracting regional infrastructure and business investment to the Region.

Proposal

1. That the Tokyu Corporation in consultation with the City of Wanneroo prepare an economic development strategy which expands the IDEAS project to incorporate additional local initiatives in order to expand employment opportunities for the existing community. The local initiatives could include:

· Performing an advocacy role and pursuing funding;

· Developing partnerships with local businesses, associations and stakeholders;

· Encouraging the development of small business centers for the region; and

· Encouraging and supporting existing and new tourism initiatives and promote Wanneroo as a day stop destination.

2. That the Tokyu Corporation submit an expanded employment strategy to the City of Wanneroo by December 2003. This Strategy will be linked to the implementation programs already being undertaken through the IDEAS Project and Quick Wins Program; and

3. That the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation ask the State Government for the development of a Regional Economic Development Strategy which is aimed at attracting regional infrastructure and business investment in the Wanneroo region.

5 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

The development of the St Andrews Project will require a large variety of public and private infrastructure including roads (regional and local), a railway line, better bus services, schools, and recreational community facilities. It would also require health services, shops, and a variety of other commercial support functions. Communications will be a critical issue and high-speed broad banding access to the area for internet services will be essential.

The provision of infrastructure must be planned and implemented to accommodate and support growth. Agreements must be reached on the timing for the provision of infrastructure, to ensure that existing and new residents are not placed at disadvantage.

It is noted that the Tokyu Corporation and WAPC entered into a Deed of Infrastructure Agreement in March 1999. This arrangement relates to roadworks as part of superlot infrastructure. It may need to be reviewed as the project proceeds to ensure that it remains relevant to the proposals being put forward. The City of Wanneroo would consider becoming a party to the Agreement.

Two key pieces of regional infrastructure are the railway and the connection of Marmion Avenue. The City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation need to work together with other landowners and the Government to ensure that these services are planned and provided for when they are needed.

In the case of Marmion Avenue it is essential this connection be made by 2005-2006, when development will be well underway and additional road capacity will be required.

The provision of infrastructure needs also to be coordinated so that if land is sold off then suitable arrangements are in place for its provision in the context of the requirements of the District and Local Structure Plans.

Proposal

1. The Tokyu Corporation agrees to work with the City of Wanneroo to ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the provision of regional and local infrastructure, and that suitable arrangements are adopted for its provision should land be sold to third parties;

2. That the City of Wanneroo and the Tokyu Corporation agree to negotiate with the State Government and other landowners to the south of Yanchep with the objective of having Marmion Avenue connected to Yanchep by 2005-2006; and

3. That the Tokyu Corporation as a matter of urgency investigates the connection of St Andrews to other parts of the metropolitan area via a broadband network.

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

ATTACHMENT 3

CITY OF WANNEROO

St Andrews Project Advisory Committee

TERMS OF REFERENCE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Council of the City of Wanneroo (the "Council") establishes this committee under the powers given in Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995, the committee to be known as the St Andrews Project Advisory Committee, (the "Committee").

The Council appoints to the Committee those persons or organizational representatives whose names appear in Section 4.0 below. Membership of the Committee shall, unless otherwise specified, be for a term ceasing on the first Saturday in May in the year the City’s local government elections are held, after which time the Council may appoint members for a further term.

The Committee shall act for and on behalf of Council in accordance with provisions of the Local Government Act 1995.

2.0 NAME

The name of the Committee is the St Andrews Project Advisory Committee

3.0 OBJECTIVE

Objective:

To provide a forum for coordinating and discussing the various aspects of:

· The Strategic Cooperation Agreement between Tokyu Corportaion, Yanchep Sun City, the Western Australian State Government and the City of Wanneroo pertaining to the St Andrews project; and

· Any Memorandum of Understanding or such other agreement reached between the Tokyu Corporation and the City of Wanneroo.

Tasks:

3.1 To participate in the implementation and review of the existing Strategic Co-operation Agreement;

3.2 Develop and maintain strong lines of communication in order to ensure that the vision for St Andrews can be achieved as quickly and efficiently as possible;

3.3 Advise on the connection between Smart Growth initiatives of the City of Wanneroo and the St Andrews project;

3.4 Advise on the social and community development programs;

3.5 Advise on Concept Plans, Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendments and District Structure Plan with related urban design plans;

3.6 Advise on local economic development and employment strategy for the project; and

3.7 Advise on plans covering the staging of development and the provision of regional and local infrastructure.

4.0 MEMBERSHIP

Elected Members

Mayor

2 North Ward Councillors

Council Officers (voting members)

Chief Executive Officer

Director, Planning & Development

Tokyu Corporation

Three Representatives

5.0 PRESIDING MEMBER

The Committee shall appoint a Presiding Member and Deputy Presiding Member to conduct its business. The Presiding Member shall ensure that minutes of the proceedings are kept. The CEO or delegated nominee will attend the first meeting to conduct the election of the Presiding Member or at a subsequent meeting if a new Presiding Member is to be elected.

6.0 MEETINGS

6.1 The Committee shall determine the scheduling and frequency of meetings, however, it is to meet at least once every three months;

6.2 Notice of meetings including an agenda shall be given to members at least 3 days prior to each meeting when possible;

6.3 The Presiding member shall ensure that detailed minutes of all meetings are kept and shall, not later than 5 days after each meeting, provide the members and Council with a copy of such minutes; and

6.4 All Members of the Committee shall have one vote. If the vote of the members present are equally divided, the person presiding can cast a second vote.

7.0 QUORUM

Quorum for a meeting shall be at least 50% of the number of offices including at least two representatives each from Council and Tokyu Corporation, whether vacant or not. A decision of the Committee does not have effect unless it has been made by a simple majority.

8.0 DELEGATED POWERS

The Committee has no specific powers under the Local Government Act and is to advise and make recommendations to Council and the Tokyu Corporation only.

9.0 TERMINATION OF COMMITTEE

Termination of the Committee shall be:

9.1 in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995; or

9.2 at the direction of Council.

10.0 Officer(s) Responsible for Management of Committee

Planning and Development Directorate

EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed

CE05-07/03 Pre-Funding Agreement for Construction of Quinns Road Railway Crossing Road Bridge

To be circulated under separate cover.

Item 9 Motions on Notice

Item 10 Urgent Business

Item 11 Confidential

C01-07/03 Petition for Traffic Signals at the Intersection of Hepburn Avenue and Giralt Road, Marangaroo

File Ref: P0025/V01

File Name: SBAPetition for Traffic Signals at the intersection of Hepburn Avenue and Giralt Road Marangaroo.doc This line will not be

Level 3 Approval by nb Date 20 June 2003

Level 2 Approval by nb Date 20 June 2003

Level 1 Approval by nb Date 20 June 2003printed dont delete

Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services

Disclosure of Interest: Nil

Author: Rob Korenhof

Meeting Date: 01 July 2003

StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Recommendation

THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:

· (d) legal advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting;

EndOfRecommendation This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete

Item 12 Date of Next Meeting

The next Ordinary Councillors Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday, 15 July 2003, to be held at the Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.

Att	WAPC No/ Received Date	Location / Owner	DPS2 Zoning LDU Category	Advice	WAPC Advised
1	121697 31/03/2003	Lot 8 (59) Kingsway, Madeley Giuseppe La Russa	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	05/05/2003
2	121755 03/04/2003	Lot 49 (41) Archer Street, Pearsall A & K Cardile	Reservation – Primary Regional Road / Urban Development SCU6	Not Supported Note: within 500m of a poultry farm	12/05/2003
3	121864 08/05/2003	Lot 11 (252) Kingsway, Darch J & S Barone	Urban Development SCU1	Supported	28/05/2003
4	121893 17/04/2003	Lot 9000 (131) Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove Homeswest Vacant	Special Residential 02/Urban Development/ Reservation – Other Regional Road SCU1	Supported	20/05/2003
5	121894 17/04/2003	Lot 9000 (131) Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove Homeswest Vacant	Special Residential 02/Urban Development/ Reservation – Other Regional Road SCU1	Supported	13/05/2003
6	121973 02/05/2003	Lot 238 (58) Amberley Way, Pearsall P & W Manners	Urban Development SCU5	Supported	13/05/2003
7	122014 14/05/2003	Lot 1 (1902) Marmion Avenue, Clarkson Automotive Holdings Group Pty Ltd	Centre SCU5	Supported	26/05/2003
8	122036 07/05/2003	Lot 5 (42) Backshall Place, Wanneroo Terra Property Pty Ltd	Urban Development SCU 1	Supported	20/05/2003
9	344-03 03/04/2003	Lot 200 (37) St Andrews Drive, Yanchep I L & L Glavish	Residential SCU5	Supported	12/05/2003