7.00pm, 31 August, 2004
Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
Members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting.
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and statement time:
· Questions should only relate to the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or employees.
· Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
· The second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
Deputations
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Executive Services on 9405 5097.
· A time period of 10 minutes is set aside for each deputation.
· Deputations shall not exceed five (5) persons in number and only three (3) of those persons shall be at liberty to address the Council and to respond to questions the Mayor and Councillors may have.
Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries on this agenda, please contact Executive Services on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for tape recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Meetings.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, of electors and of the Audit Committee shall be recorded, by the City, on sound recording equipment except, in the case of meetings of the Council or the Audit Committee, where the Council or the Committee, as the case may be, closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding sub clause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council or of the Audit Committee which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council or the Audit Committee, as the case requires, resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recorded Tapes
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of the taped proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer.
(5) Elected Members may listen to a recording of the Council proceedings upon request, free of charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer.
(6) Costs of providing taped proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the tape plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recordings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s schedule of fees and charges each year.
Retention of Tapes
(7) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the Library Board of Western Australia Act (1951-83), General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records. The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(8) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors and the Audit Committee meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 31 August, 2004 commencing at 7.00pm.
C JOHNSON
Chief Executive Officer
26 August 2004
CONTENTS
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
OC02-08/04 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 August 2004
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
PT01-08/04 Traffic Management – Woodward Circle, Marangaroo
PD05-08/04 Adoption of a Tree Preservation Policy
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
PD07-08/04 Close of Advertising: Amendment No 41 to District Planning Scheme No 2
PD09-08/04 Adoption of the Draft Darch Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan
PD10-08/04 Proposed Local Structure Plan No. 56: Lot 505 Pederick Road, Neerabup
PD11-08/04 Requested Closure of Pedestrian Access Way between Lalina Way and Civic Drive, Wanneroo.
PD12-08/04 Development Applications Determined by Delegated Authority for July 2004
PD13-08/04 Subdivision Applications Determined under Delegated Authority during July 2004
TS08-08/04 Tender No 04387 - The Supply and Delivery of Crushed Limestone
TS09-08/04 Tender No 04394 - The Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Stabilised Limestone
TS10-08/04 Tender No 04388 - The Supply and Delivery of Clay Brick Pavers
TS11-08/04 Tender No 04389 - The Supply and Delivery of Concrete Segmental Brick Pavers
TS12-08/04 Tender No 04386 - The Provision of Material Testing Services
TS14-08/04 Tender No 04384 - The Preparation and Maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets
TS15-08/04 Tender No. 04393 for the Construction of Floodlighting Works at Warradale Park, Landsdale
TS16-08/04 Authority to use Traffic Signs and Devices at Roadworks - New Instrument of Authorisation
TS17-08/04 Pedestrian Access Way Upgrade Colne Way - Casserley Avenue, Girrawheen
TS18-08/04 Disposal of Excavator Plant No. 98880
TS19-08/04 Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group - Partnering Agreement
TS20-08/04 Light Vehicle Fleet Replacement Policy
CS05-08/04 Warrant of Payments - For the Period to 31 July 2004
CD08-08/04 Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in Wanneroo
CD10-08/04 Carramar Community Centre, Carramar
CD11-08/04 Houghton Park Development, Carramar
CD12-08/04 Application to Keep More than Two Dogs
Strategic & Executive Services
CE04-08/04 Donations and Sponsorship Requests Determined under Delegated Authority - August 2004
CE05-08/04 Requests for Donations - August 2004
CE06-08/04 Annual Review - City of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register
AGENDA
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 August 2004 be confirmed.
Cr Treby presented a petition signed by 50 signatories requesting Council undertake a formal review of traffic management associated with Woodward Circle, Marangaroo. Residents were deeply concerned with the excessive speed and irresponsible traffic behaviour of motorists utilising Woodward Circle.
UPDATE
A report in response to the petition is scheduled for the 12 October meeting.
Cr Stewart to declare an indirect financial interest in Item TS14-08/04, page 131, due to being on the committee of the Kingsway Cricket Club.
Cr Stewart to declare an impartial interest in Item TS15-08/04, page 137, due to a family friend being involved in the tender process.
File Ref: S09/0078
File Name: AAdoption of a Tree Preservation Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 26 August 2004
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Ian Bignell
Meeting Date: 17 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the public submissions and adoption of the draft Tree Preservation Policy.
Background
A significant amount of remnant native vegetation exists within the City. Whilst part of this vegetation is protected by mechanisms such as reservations or Bush Forever, large areas containing unprotected vegetation are allocated for future development.
The community has expressed increasing concern over the widespread clearing which occurs as a result of development and this has been most noticeable on larger landholdings being prepared for subdivision. The conventional approach to developing these areas has been to either recontour or bench the land to provide level building blocks. Whilst this approach provides for the practical and cost effective development of the resultant lots, it also results in the loss of most of the remaining remnant native vegetation.
Development areas often contain trees of conservation value or trees whose protection is desirable from a landscape or local character perspective. In these areas, it is both possible and desirable for development to proceed in a more sensitive manner. By giving greater consideration to the existing features of an area at the planning stage, the retention of some significant trees can result.
In order to address this issue, Council at its meeting on 21 May 2002 (item PD01-05/02), adopted a draft Tree Preservation Policy for the purpose of advertising. The draft Policy was prepared as a Local Planning Policy pursuant to Clause 8.11 of District Planning Scheme No 2 (DPS2).
Detail
The objective of the draft Policy is to provide a mechanism to assist in the protection of significant trees within the following specified areas:
· Vacant land and bushland which will be subject to future development; and
· Existing and proposed public open space reserves.
The draft policy is not intended to apply to existing developed private property, however it recommends that the principles of the policy be considered for future development which may affect significant individual trees located within existing developed areas of the district, as well as all publicly-owned land.
The draft Policy recommends that applications (including applications for structure plans, subdivision and planning approval for major earthworks) should take into consideration trees or stands of trees wherever possible and practicable. It also recommends that plans be provided with the relevant application to show the location of all trees, highlighting significant trees and the reasons given for the classification.
The draft policy further provides that the removal of significant trees should be regarded as a last resort and only undertaken where the option of retention is considered impractical. In these circumstances the draft policy provides the option for the City to require the planting of replacement endemic trees elsewhere on the site.
The draft Policy acknowledges that the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is the decision making authority for subdivisions and therefore recommends that it be encouraged to have regard for the Policy.
Consultation
The draft policy was advertised for a period of 30 days closing on 5 July 2002. Advertising was undertaken by way of notices in the Wanneroo Times as well as individual letters to relevant stakeholders, including community, environmental and land development groups. A total of 14 submissions were received at the close of advertising.
Comment
Of the 14 submissions received, four supported the draft policy, six (including one from the Urban Development Institute of Australia [UDIA]) supported the general intent of the policy however raised numerous issues over its implications for development. Another four submissions just raised issues over the policy. Key issues raised in the submissions are outlined and commented on below.
Issue No. |
Issue |
Comment |
1. |
There is a need for clearer guidelines and specification over the definition for ‘significant’ to provide certainty for developers and their consultants.
|
Whilst a number of the submissions sought a firmer specification on what trees may have been affected in terms of minimum size etc, it is intended that the policy remain flexible to enable the significance of particular trees to be determined in the context of an overall proposal. The policy acknowledges that it will not be possible to preserve all significant trees in all cases.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
2. |
The policy should acknowledge the limitations imposed by other policy requirements, engineering standards for subdivision and development, e.g. road construction and other infrastructure provision, as well as the market demand for level building lots, that prevents the retention of many trees.
|
The policy acknowledges that not all trees will be retained and other issues need to be considered in addition to significant trees when assessing applications. The policy will however ensure that trees are recognised and considered in the decision making process and provision made to retain significant examples in open space, road reserves and other appropriate locations, where possible and practicable.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
3. |
The policy will have limitations as public open space is required to be provided over only 8% or 10% of developers’ landholdings.
|
As per comment under issue 2. In addition, it should be noted that the competing needs of open space areas (for active and passive recreation) will invariably result in the removal of trees from areas designated for open space. The policy however seeks to minimise the loss of significant trees by appropriate planning and encourages suitable replacement tress to compensate for any losses.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
4. |
Application of the policy will impose additional cost and approval time delays for developers.
|
It is not considered that the documentation requirements of the policy are unreasonable and in fact should form part of any comprehensive site analysis regardless of this policy. It is the intention that any assessment be undertaken as early in the development process as possible, preferably at the structure planning stage, which will minimise the impact of any delays.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
5. |
The policy lacks scientific rigor and does not consider sustainable development outcomes. It also duplicates other initiatives such as Bush Forever that already provide for vegetation protection. |
The intention of the policy is to retain significant trees in development areas predominantly for their amenity and local character value. It is considered that this policy will complement other more scientifically based policy initiatives such as Bush Forever or the City’s proposed Local Biodiversity Strategy.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
6. |
The policy should provide a mechanism for arbitration of disputes and appeals.
|
Any discretionary decision to impose conditions on, or refuse applications would be subject of the usual appeal provisions pursuant to the Town Planning and Development Act and the City’s District Planning Scheme. A separate mechanism for arbitration or appeal is therefore not considered necessary.
Recommendation:
That the issue be dismissed.
|
Given that a number of the City’s major developers, including the developers’ industry body, the UDIA, lodged submissions on the draft policy, the Administration met with representatives of the UDIA to discuss and clarify the intent and provisions of the policy. Following these discussions the UDIA advised that it is now comfortable with the City’s position and encouraged an approach discussed at the meeting that the Administration will meet with the developer/relevant consultants with a view to achieving a balanced outcome when identifying trees of significance.
The UDIA also encouraged the City to review the policy after it has been in operation for 12 months to monitor its performance and workability.
Since the consultation period, the Administration has informally applied key aspects of the draft policy in order to test its workability and to enable any implementation problems to be addressed prior to final adoption. Some of the specific structure plan examples where the policy has been applied include the Butler –Jindalee District Structure Plan, the Somerley Estate in Clarkson, the Capricorn Coastal Village in Yanchep, Lot 501 Two Rocks and the Primary School amendment to the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan. In each case the City has been successful in obtaining positive outcomes in relation to tree retention and in general the City’s requirements have either been readily adopted, or in some cases actually promoted by the developer. In view of this, it is now recommended that Council adopt the draft policy without modification.
Further Report
Council considered this report at its meeting on 20 July 2004 (item PD01-07/04) and resolved to refer the item back to the Council Administration for further investigation. Minor changes to the draft Policy have now been made in the section headed “Structure Plans, Subdivision and Planning Approval” to address concerns raised by Elected Members. The modifications are shown in italic typeface in the policy and seek:
1. to emphasise that subdividers will not be forced to provide public open space areas in excess of the amounts required under WAPC subdivision policies, although there will be opportunities for negotiation in specific cases; and
2. to reiterate that significant individual trees shall only be preserved on private lots wherever practicable and possible.
At the Briefing Meeting held on 24 August 2003, Elected Members also sought that the policy include a clause indicating that significant trees identified as a result of application of this policy will be recorded on the City’s property information system. This clause is also shown in italics under the heading Recording in the policy recommended for adoption.
Statutory Compliance
The process of adopting a Local Planning Policy is laid out under clause 8.11 of DPS2, that is:
1. Prepare and adopt a draft Policy;
2. Advertise the draft policy for a period of at least 21 days;
3. Review the draft Policy in the light of any submissions and then resolve either to finally adopt the draft Policy, with or without modification, or not to proceed with the draft Policy.
Once formally adopted a Local Planning Policy will not bind Council’s decision making. The Council will however need to have due regard to the provisions of the policy and the objectives which the policy is designed to achieve when considering applications.
Strategic Implications
The Tree Preservation Policy is consistent with the Environmental Sustainability Goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to value, protect and enhance our natural environment in harmony with the growth and progress of our City.
A key focus area of the City’s Local Environmental Strategy also specifically deals with biodiversity, with Action Item 3 requiring the preparation of a City-wide plan to increase biodiversity protection.
In addition, key principle 3 of the City’s draft Smart Growth Strategy relates to the long term health of the environment and seeks to promote development that minimises environmental impact, together with practices that conserve and enhance natural areas.
Policy Implications
The policy will complement a range of other initiatives being undertaken by both the City (such as the proposed Local Biodiversity Strategy) and the State Government (such as Bush Forever).
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Officer/Policy & Local Laws Committee Recommendation: 17/08/2004
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to clause 8.11 of District Planning Scheme No.2 FINALLY ADOPTS the draft Tree Preservation Policy with modification as set out below:
_______________________________________________________________________
Tree Preservation
________________________________________________________________________
Owner: Planning and Development
Distribution: All Employees
Implementation: 01 July 2004
Next Review: 01 July 2006
_______________________________________________________________________
Objective
To provide a mechanism to protect significant trees of the City within the following specified areas:
· vacant land and bushland which will be subject to future development; and
· existing and proposed public open space reserves.
This Policy does not apply to existing developed private property, however the City will promote the principles of the Policy when considering future development which may affect significant individual trees located within existing developed areas of the district, as well as all publicly-owned land.
Statement
The City of Wanneroo, being an outer Metropolitan local authority, is characterised by its remnant native vegetation, its pockets of large native trees, and in some areas, its semi-rural nature.
The City considers the trees within the district to be a major community resource, and part of its local heritage. It is common for trees to add value to property, and to contribute significantly to the amenity of the City. Trees also provide shade and shelter from winds, provide habitat for wildlife, reduce the likelihood of soil erosion and salinity, and filter dust and traffic noise. The value of trees to the community is therefore multi-faceted.
The loss of trees is becoming an increasing community concern, and the City has noted that wide-spread clearing of trees is a common practice. This is most noticeable on larger landholdings being prepared for subdivision and development.
There are increasing expectations from the community that the City will preserve and enhance the amenity of their localities by addressing this issue.
This Policy may be considered by the City, along with other matters, when it considers applications for:
(i) proposed Structure Plans;
(ii) the subdivision of land referred to the City by the Western Australian
Planning Commission (WAPC); and
(iii) planning approval involving major earthworks.
While all applications for (i), (ii) and (iii) above will be tested against the Policy as a matter of course, the Policy is aimed principally at the orderly and proper subdivision and development of larger bushland sites, and publicly owned land, containing endemic or local native trees.
Circumstances Under Which This Policy Shall Be Applied:
The City expects that every endeavour will be made in the course of assessing applications (including structure plans, subdivisions and applications for planning approval) to save and protect significant individual trees and groups of trees.
Structure Plans, Subdivision and Planning Approval
Subdivision design shall carefully locate future public open space areas to accommodate significant groups of trees. Wherever possible and practicable, significant individual trees shall be preserved on private lots and retained appropriately within proposed road reserves, public open space reserves and within car parks.
In applying the policy, the City shall not require subdividers to provide public open space areas greater than the 8 or 10 percent requirement under WAPC subdivision policies, however there will be an opportunity for negotiated outcomes in specific cases.
Any application for planning approval involving major earthworks or proposed new structure plan involving any bushland or any uncleared land shall include as an integral part of the supporting information a suitably scaled, accurate site plan and/or aerial photograph showing the location of all trees, and highlighting significant trees and groups of trees, and the reasons for that classification.
The City recognises that the WAPC is the decision making authority for subdivisions and will encourage the WAPC to require that the location of significant trees on subdivision plans is similarly marked.
Where necessary, the City will recommend to the WAPC the imposition of appropriate conditions on subdivision applications to ensure adherence to the provisions of this Policy occurs.
Public Open Space Reserves
Wherever possible and practicable, the City of Wanneroo will protect existing significant individual trees and groups of trees located on public open space reserves. Any necessary development on open space reserves (for public buildings, infrastructure, etc.) will be located and designed in such a way as to ensure that the loss of significant trees will be minimised. In the event that significant tree loss is unavoidable, the City shall plant suitable replacement trees (preferably local native species) in sufficient quantities and in appropriate locations to compensate for any losses.
Replacement of Trees
The removal of significant trees shall be regarded as a last resort and only undertaken after all other options have been considered and rejected as impractical. "Expedience" shall not be considered as sufficient grounds for removing a significant tree or group of trees.
It is recognised that space for trees within the City will diminish as urban development occurs, and as residential densities increase. Therefore, where approval is given under this Policy for a tree or trees to be removed, the City may require a suitable replacement endemic tree or trees to be planted elsewhere on a site.
Recording
Significant trees identified as a result of application of this policy will be recorded on the City’s property information system.
Definitions
Significant: The City may at its discretion deem that a tree or group of trees is "significant" on any of the following grounds:
i) age and condition;
ii) height;
iii) spread;
iv) girth;
v) species, whether rare and endangered or not;
vi) historical association;
vii) habitat value;
viii) landscape amenity value;
ix) by the request of the relevant landowner;
Responsibility for Implementation
Chief Executive Officer, all Directors and Managers
2. PROVIDES notification of the final adoption of the policy by publishing a notice once in a newspaper circulating within the district.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
File Ref: TPS/0040
File Name: BAADOPTION OF AMENDMENT NO 40 TO DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO 2 RECODE LOT 941 27
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004BELHAVEN TERRACE QUINNS ROCKS F.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Author: Chris Brady
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 2
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the public submissions and adoption of Amendment No. 40 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Applicant |
Chappell and Lambert |
Owner |
Department of Housing and Works |
Location |
Lot 941 (27) Belhaven Terrace, Quinns Rocks |
Site Area |
2075m2 |
Existing DPS 2 Zoning |
|
Proposed DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential R40 |
Background
Council, at its meeting on 27 April 2004 (Item PD06-04/04), resolved to prepare Amendment No. 40 to recode Lot 941 Belhaven Terrace from R20 to R40 and to rationalise other density codes in the vicinity.
Detail
Lot 941 is located at the corner of Belhaven Terrace and Sirius Ramble, Quinns Rocks. The site is located approximately 200-metres north of the Quinns Beach Primary School, 200-metres east of a proposed local shopping centre on Santa Barbara Parade and immediately north-east of Belhaven Park (refer Attachment 1).
The Department of Housing and Works currently owns Lot 941, which it created in January 2004 for grouped housing purposes. The site is currently vacant. Under the site’s current R20 density coding, up to 4 grouped dwellings could be built on the land.
The majority of the land surrounding the site is coded R20 and has been subdivided into single residential lots, with the exception of two R40 sites to the north and east of the subject site (refer Attachment 2). The original structure planning for the locality included these two R40 grouped housing sites, however the land was subdivided into single residential lots, with single dwellings having either now been constructed or approved on the majority of the lots. DPS2 has not been amended to reflect the current development and subdivision that has occurred on these sites.
The applicant’s proposal relates to Lot 941 and proposes to recode this lot to R40. The R40 density coding would allow for the development of a maximum of 9 grouped dwellings, five more than under the existing R20 density coding. A planning approval would be required prior to the commencement of development. Design and amenity considerations relating to matters such as setbacks, car parking, building height etc. would be considered at that stage in accordance with the requirements of the Residential Design Codes (R Codes).
Although not part of the application, it was also considered appropriate that the two adjacent R40 sites be rationalised during the amendment process. The eastern R40 site (including Lots 949 to 951 Meringa Crescent, Lots 954 and 955 Agnes Way and Lots 933 to 936 Belhaven Terrace) and portions of the northern R40 site (being portions of Lot 971 Hampshire Drive and Lot 965 Meringa Crescent) should be recoded from R40 to R20, to reflect the current single residential use on the land.
The Environmental Protection Authority advised the City on 14 June 2004 that the scheme amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. The Western Australian Planning Commission’s consent to advertise was not required in this instance.
Consultation
A 42 day advertising period was carried out from 29 June 2004 to 3 August 2004. Advertising was undertaken by way of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper and letters to adjacent landowners. At the close of advertising, three submissions had been received from nearby residents, all objecting to the recoding of Lot 941.
Comment
Two submissions did not provide any reasons for opposing the recoding. The issues raised by the third submissions and an Administration comment on each is set out below:
Issue 1
Increased housing density would not fit in with the density of the surrounding area.
Comment
The Quinns Rocks locality is predominately coded R20, with several R40 medium density grouped housing sites. Lot 941 is located in close proximity to public transport, the Quinns Beach Primary School, Belhaven Park and proposed local shops on Santa Barbara Parade.
The proposal to apply an R40 density code over Lot 941 is generally in keeping with the City’s practice of providing for a diversity of housing choice and medium density housing in the vicinity of activity centres, public open space and public transport routes.
The proposed R40 coding is also considered to be consistent with Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) policy. Part 2 of the residential section of its “Development Control Policy Manual” specifies the following as an objective “…to facilitate the supply of residential lots of a wide range of sizes and shapes…”.
Further to this, the WAPC’s “Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Structure Plans” manual (1992), Part 3.4.1 – “The Location and Density of Housing Areas” promotes a mix in housing densities and specifically suggests that structure plans should ‘…include medium and higher density housing sites, particularly near significant employment locations, public transport routes, commercial centres, educational facilities and recreation areas’.
More recently the WAPC has released the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ document. This document reiterates the more traditional policy provisions and specifically states that “Smaller lots and lots capable of supporting higher density should be located close to town and neighbourhood centres, public transport and adjacent to high amenity areas such as parks”.
Given the location of the application area, in close proximity to community infrastructure and a future local shopping centre, it is considered appropriate to support the increased density.
Recommendation
That the issue be dismissed.
Issue 2
The block was previously zoned for two aged care dwellings, and there is an expectation that this zoning would be retained.
Comment
Since the original structure planning for the area, Lot 941 has always been coded R20. Under the current and previous versions of the R Codes, a lot coded R20 with an area of 2075m2 could potentially accommodate up to 4 grouped dwellings. In addition, a 50% density bonus could be applied to aged care development, meaning that the site could potentially accommodate up to 6 aged care dwellings under the existing R20 density code.
The City has not issued any planning approvals for Lot 941 that would give rise to any expectation of a maximum of two dwellings on this site and in fact a restriction of this nature would result in the site being developed to a significantly lower density than the surrounding area, equivalent to approximately R10.
Recommendation
That the issue be dismissed.
Issue 3
Current ocean views from the submitter’s property would be interrupted by development on the subject site.
Comment
Regardless of the density coding, the site will ultimately be developed for grouped housing purposes. The building height requirements are the same for development under both the R20 and R40 codes.
Amenity impacts on neighbouring properties will be addressed through the planning approval process. It should however be noted that loss of ocean views is not usually considered to be a valid planning consideration, particularly where the application complies with the ‘Acceptable Development’ provisions of the R Codes.
Recommendation
That the issue be dismissed.
Statutory Compliance
The Scheme Amendment process has complied with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this amendment is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan, and particular Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17(2) ADOPTS, without modification, Amendment No. 40 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to recode Lot 941 Belhaven Terrace, Quinns Rocks from Residential R20 to Residential R40 and recode Lots 933, 934, 935 & 936 Belhaven Terrace, Lots 954 & 955 Agnes Way, Lots 949, 950, 951 & 965 Meringa Crescent and Lot 971 Hampshire Drive, Quinns Rocks from R20 and R40 to R20.
2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (a) (g) AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the amendment documentation.
3. FORWARDS the amendment documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration, REQUESTING the Hon Minister for Planning grant final approval to the amendment.
4. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on this scheme amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: TPS/0041
File Name: BAClose of Advertising Amendment No 41 to District Planning Scheme No 2.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 11 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 11 August 2004delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Ian Bignell
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments 1
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the public submissions and adoption of Amendment No. 41 to District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2).
Background
Council, at its meeting on 27 April 2004 (refer Item PD07/04-04), resolved to prepare Amendment No 41 to DPS2 to implement various rezonings to accord with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) following finalisation of the Clarkson-Butler MRS Amendment No 992/33 and advertise the amendment for a period of 42 days.
Detail
Amendment No 41 comprises three rezoning proposals as follows:
1. Rezoning portions of Lots 118 and 807 and ‘A’ Class Reserve 27575 Clarkson from unzoned and General Rural to Urban Development.
2. Rezoning portions of land abutting the Mitchell Freeway reservation at Clarkson, Ridgewood, Butler and Alkimos from unzoned and General Rural to Urban Development.
3. Rezoning portions of land abutting the Wanneroo Road reservation at Nowergup, Neerabup and Carramar from unzoned to Rural Resource, General Rural, Special Residential and Special Rural.
The amendment also introduces environmental conditions into Schedule 12 of the Scheme relating to development of the area subject of proposal 1 above.
A plan indicating the locations of the subject land is included as Attachment 1.
The Environmental Protection Authority advised the City on 31 May 2004 that the scheme amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. The WAPC’s consent to advertise was not required in this case.
Consultation
A 42 day public advertising period was carried out between 15 June 2004 and 27 July 2004. This advertising was carried out by way of an on site sign (in respect of rezoning of portions of Lot 118 Clarkson and adjoining areas), an advertisement in the local newspaper and letters to affected and nearby landowners.
At the close of advertising four submissions were received, one from the Department of Conservation and Land Management expressing no objection to the proposal and three letters of objection. These submissions originated from residents of Mindarie and Quinns Rocks and all relate to proposal 1, the rezoning of portion of Lots 118, 807 and A Class Reserve 27575 Clarkson.
Comment
The issues raised by the submissions relate to the loss of natural bushland areas and can be summarised as follows:
The area comprises natural bushland in good condition and scenic amenity value, and is one of the few remaining habitat refuges for wildlife in this area. Wildlife is being forced further out by development and this is placing immense pressure on remaining bush in the coastal reserve. The majority of people in the area value the natural bushland and wildlife, and there is already a lack of trees and shrubs due to bad planning and development.
Identification of this area (subject of Proposal 1) for future urban uses has a long history, dating back to the North West Corridor Structure Plan of 1977 (and again in the 1992 Plan). These Plans also identify a large conservation area (serving as an ecological linkage between the coastal reserve area and Neerabup National Park) immediately south of this land, surrounding the Tamala Park refuse disposal facility, extending to Kinross and Burns Beach). Rezoning of the subject land to Urban Deferred and of the areas south to Parks and Recreation Reserve as a result of the Clarkson-Butler MRS Amendment has given effect to the North West Corridor Structure Plan proposals. The MRS Amendment proposal for rezoning of Lot 118 and adjoining areas was subject of formal environmental assessment by the EPA which required, inter alia, that the matter of vegetation, flora and fauna protection be addressed, and this is reflected in environmental conditions imposed by the Minister for the Environment (and carried over into this local scheme amendment). One of the conditions requires preparation of an environmental management plan addressing locally significant vegetation, declared and rare flora and threatened ecological communities identification on the site, and interface issues with the adjoining Parks and Recreation reserve.
Accordingly, it is considered that the matter of bushland loss has been addressed in planning undertaken to date, and in further work which will be required as part of structure planning for the land prior to any development taking place. These submissions should therefore be dismissed.
Statutory Compliance
The amendment process has complied with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this scheme amendment is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular, Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17(2) ADOPTS, without modification, Amendment No. 41 to District Planning Scheme No.2 to:
a) Rezone portions of Lots 118 and 807 and ‘A’ Class Reserve 27575 Clarkson from unzoned and General Rural to Urban Development.
b) Rezone portions of land abutting the Mitchell Freeway reservation at Clarkson, Ridgewood, Butler and Alkimos from unzoned and General Rural to Urban Development.
c) Rezone portions of land abutting the Wanneroo Road reservation at Nowergup, Neerabup and Carramar from unzoned to Rural Resource, General Rural, Special Residential and Special Rural.
d) Amend the Scheme Map accordingly.
e) Insert the following in Schedule 12: Environmental Conditions:
“3. Location of Land
Portions of Lots 118 and 807 and ‘A’ Class Reserve 27575, Clarkson
Environmental Conditions:
3.1 Buffer from Tamala Park Landfill
Residential land uses shall not be permitted within 500 metres of the active face of any existing or proposed putrescible waste filling area. Encroachments within this buffer may be acceptable if it is demonstrated to the Environmental Protection Authority, through appropriate studies and investigations, that odour, noise, landfill gas and dust will not adversely impact on future residents.
3.2 Environmental Management Plans
The following Management Plans are to be prepared in accordance with the specifications set out in Attachment 2 to the Minister for the Environment’s “Statement that a Scheme may be Implemented” No 629 published on 8 July 2003 and shall subsequently be implemented in accordance with the provisions of those Management Plans:
- Environmental Management Plan.
- Stygofauna and Troglobitic Fauna Management Plan.”
2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (a) (g) AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the amendment documentation.
3. FORWARDS the amendment documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration REQUESTING the Hon Minister for Planning and Infrastructure grant final approval to the amendment.
4. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on this scheme amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submittors of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: TPS/0045V01
File Name: BAProposed Amendment No 45 to District Planning Scheme No 2 to Increase the Residential Density Coding for Lot 3 60.doc
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Mike H Date 05 August 2004This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Michael Hudson
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments 2
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application to amend District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) to recode Lot 3 Hainsworth Avenue, Girrawheen from R20 to R40.
Applicant |
Chappell and Lambert Town Planning Urban Design |
Owner |
Department for Housing and Works |
Location |
Lot 3 (60) Hainsworth Avenue Girrawheen |
Site Area |
4.251 Hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential |
Background
The subject site is part of the New North project, which is a joint venture between the Satterley Property Group and the Department for Housing and Works, and seeks to refurbish and redevelop government owned residential areas to facilitate quality housing and subdivision.
The subject site is 4.251 hectares in area and is bounded by Hainsworth Avenue to the west, Winterton Way and Ferrara Way to the north, Brecknock Way to the south and Ferrara Reserve to the east (refer Attachment 1).
The site is currently zoned Residential R20 under City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) and is occupied by 72 town houses, units and flats. The majority of dwellings are proposed to be demolished, with the exception of several of the existing dwellings (town houses) that have been identified by the applicant as being suitable for refurbishment.
Detail
Chappell and Lambert on behalf of the Department for Housing and Works has made application to the City to amend District Planning Scheme No. 2 to recode Lot 3 Hainsworth Avenue, Girrawheen from R20 to R40.
A ‘Development Concept Plan’ has been submitted by the applicant in support of the recoding proposal (refer Attachment 2). The concept plan provides Council and members of the public with a possible scenario for the re-development of this site.
However, it should be noted that the concept plan will not have a statutory basis and will only serve to guide the future redevelopment of the site. The future detailed design for this land will be considered through the appropriate subdivision and/or development process.
The salient points of the proposed Concept Plan can be summarised as per the following.
· All existing structures will be demolished, with the exception of the units on the southern boundary adjoining Brecknock Way, which will be refurbished and retained within a larger lot.
· Proposed lot sizes range between approximately 300 m2 and 450 m2, with a number of larger lots being created with duplex or triplex potential. A total dwelling/lot yield of 77 dwellings has been indicated.
· The provision of a new subdivision road between Ferrara Reserve and the subject site to improve vehicle access and to promote overlooking and surveillance of the public open space. The existing dwellings currently back on to the reserve.
· Possible land exchange of approximately 2000 m2, involving the change in vesting of a portion of Ferrara Reserve to accommodate a future road on the boundary of Lot 3 and the existing Ferrara Reserve. The exchange would require the vesting of an equal area of land within the future subdivision as public open space (i.e. pocket park).
· Subdivisional roads within the application area to facilitate residential subdivision.
Consultation
All scheme amendments require public consultation. The consultation period is normally 42 days and undertaken by way of an on-site advertising sign, advertisements in the local newspaper and on the City’s website, as well as letters to relevant service agencies and adjacent landowners.
The Town Planning Regulations provide that where an amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and State policies and strategies, then the consent of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) will not be required to advertise the amendment. The WAPC’s consent to advertise will however be required if an advertising period less than 42 days is sought. Given that the proposed amendment is consistent with the MRS zoning and State policies and the recommended advertising period is 42 days, the consent of the WAPC is not required in this instance.
Comment
The Girrawheen locality is predominately coded R20, however there are several larger parcels of land that have been historically developed with state housing at densities both higher and lower than their potential under the R20 coding. The inconsistencies that exist on several of these housing developments and the current density coding’s can be attributed to the change in the development requirements from the historic General Residential Codes (GR4 zoning) of the 1960’s and 70’s and the current R20 density coding that was subsequently imposed through the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2, when it was gazetted in July 2001.
Despite the ‘town house’ style of development, the existing development on the site only achieves an average land area of approximately 580 m2 per dwelling, which is consistent with the existing density code.
The R40 density coding would provide the applicant with the necessary flexibility to create green title lots of various sizes. These lots will be serviced by a dedicated road, which will be connected to the local road system. The proposed lots sizes will be below 350 m2, and as such, it is likely that a Development Approval will be required in accordance with the provisions of the Residential Design Codes of WA, prior to further subdivision/development of the site.
The development site has already contributed to the 10% POS requirement for the locality when the area was first subdivided for residential purposes.
The proposed land exchange would require the approval of the Department for Planning and Infrastructures Land Administration Branch, the Department for Land Information and the City of Wanneroo and would be the subject of a future report to Council. Should the applicant pursue a form of development that requires a land exchange, further consideration of the following issues will need to be adequately addressed, prior to the City issuing its support.
· The extent of encroachment within the existing Ferrara Reserve for the new road and any drainage swale should be replaced either by a pocket park within the development site or a cash in lieu contribution. The merits of these options will need to be further considered.
· The applicant should prepare and implement a vegetation assessment of all mature vegetation on the site and make recommendations on the appropriateness of the location of proposed areas of POS (if this option is to be pursued) and possibilities for vegetation relocation as appropriate within the site.
· Any drainage facilities proposed to be located within existing or proposed areas of POS will require further consideration of POS credits and impacts on recreation facilities.
· Any proposed pocket parks within the development site shall be provided with adequate dedicated road frontage and opportunity for surveillance from residential lots and public access.
· The future development/subdivision of the site shall accord with the requirement of the Residential Planning Codes of WA.
· The potential for a cash-in-lieu payment for the open space being further considered as part of future discussions.
The proposed R40 coding is also considered to be consistent with Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) policy. Part 2 of the residential section of its “Development Control Policy Manual” specifies the following as an objective “…to facilitate the supply of residential lots of a wide range of sizes and shapes…”.
Further to this, the WAPC’s “Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Structure Plans” manual (1992), Part 3.4.1 – “The Location and Density of Housing Areas” promotes a mix in housing densities and specifically suggests that structure plans should ‘…include medium and higher density housing sites, particularly near significant employment locations, public transport routes, commercial centres, educational facilities and recreation areas’.
More recently the WAPC has released the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ document. This document reiterates the more traditional policy provisions and specifically states that “Smaller lots and lots capable of supporting higher density should be located close to town and neighbourhood centres, public transport and adjacent to high amenity areas such as parks”.
The creation of an R40 density code over Lot 3 is generally in keeping with the City’s practice of providing for a diversity of housing choice and medium density housing in the vicinity of activity centres, public open space and public transport routes. The proposal will provide the opportunity to redevelop the site and remove the existing dwellings that are in poor condition and are limited use.
Statutory Compliance
The scheme amendment will follow the statutory process outlined in the Town Planning Regulations.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this amendment is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular, Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Plan, which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 7 of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928 (as amended) PREPARES Amendment No. 45 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to Recode Lot 3 (60) Hainsworth Avenue Girrawheen from R20 to 40.
2. REFERS Amendment No. 45 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) pursuant to Section 7A1 of the Town Planning and Development Act 1928. Should the EPA advise that the amendment does not require assessment, ADVERTISE the amendment for a period of 42 days.
3. FORWARD a copy of the amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
4. ADVISES the applicant that the proposed land exchange would require the approval of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure’s Land Administration Branch, the Department for Land Information and the City of Wanneroo and that prior to the City issuing its support for the land exchange over portion of Ferrara Reserve the following needs to be addressed to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.
a) The extent of encroachment within the existing Ferrara Reserve for the new road and any drainage swale should be replaced either by a pocket park within the development site or a cash in lieu contribution. The merits of these options will need to be further considered.
b) The applicant should prepare and implement a vegetation assessment of all mature vegetation on the site and make recommendations on the appropriateness of the location of proposed areas of POS (if this option is to be pursued) and possibilities for vegetation relocation as appropriate within the site.
c) Any drainage facilities proposed to be located within existing or proposed areas of POS will require further consideration of POS credits and impacts on recreation facilities.
d) Any proposed pocket parks within the development site shall be provided with adequate dedicated road frontage and opportunity for surveillance from residential lots and public access.
e) The future development/subdivision of the site shall accord with the requirement of the Residential Planning Codes of WA.
f) The potential for a cash-in-lieu payment for the open space being further considered as part of future discussions.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0064V01
File Name: BAAdoption of the Draft Darch Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Chris Brady
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 3
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the adoption of the draft Darch Neighbourhood Centre Local Structure Plan No.51 for Lots 100 and 9028 Kingsway, Darch.
Applicant |
Development Planning Strategies |
Owner |
Stockland & Robinson Investments Pty Ltd |
Location |
Corner Ashdale Boulevard & Kingsway, Darch |
Site Area |
2.8 hectares (approx) |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Background
The East Wanneroo Cell 6 Local Structure Plan (LSP) was adopted by Council in 2001. The LSP covers a broad area of Darch and Madeley, and denotes the subject site as a Neighbourhood Centre and Community Purposes site (refer Attachment 1). The subject site is located at the corner of Kingsway and Ashdale Boulevard in Darch (refer Attachment 2). The surrounding landholdings are being progressively subdivided for residential purposes in accordance with the LSP.
Detail
The Zoning Plan for the Cell 6 LSP identifies the subject site as ‘Centre’ zone. Part 3.13.3 of District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2) specifies that no subdivision should, or other development shall, be commenced or carried out in a Centre Zone until an Agreed Structure Plan has been prepared and adopted under the provisions of Part 9 of the Scheme.
The key features of the draft Structure Plan are for the Darch Neighbourhood Centre are as follows:
1. A total land area of 2.7966 hectares, bound by Kingsway, Ashdale Boulevard, Athenny Way and (future) Carlingford Drive;
2. A Commercial zoning over the entire site with a density coding of R40 and a retail net lettable area limit of 3,550 square metres;
3. Provision for a fully integrated unit for a community purpose facility to be included in the design of the main shopping centre building;
4. Various design provisions to ensure appropriate interface between the centre and surrounding areas;
A copy of the statutory section of the structure plan is included in Attachment 3.
Consultation
The Structure Plan was advertised for a period of 28 days by way of two on-site signs, letters to adjacent landowners and an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper. The submission period closed on 3 August 2004. At the close of advertising, one submission had been received.
Comment
The issues raised by the submission and an Administration comment on each is set out below:
Issue 1
Landscaped gardens and / or parklands should be included in the periphery of the centre to provide a buffer between the centre and surrounding streets. The submitter has included a plan that proposes approximately 20-metres on the northern and eastern boundary of the Structure Plan area to be retained as a landscape buffer.
Comment
District Planning Scheme No. 2 provides for eight percent of this site to be set aside for landscaping, including three metre wide landscape strips along the street frontages. It also requires shade trees to be planted within car parking areas. It is considered that the substantial landscape buffers suggested by the submitter are unreasonable and will not significantly improve the amenity for adjacent residents.
Recommendation
That the issue be dismissed.
Issue 2
Opposed to a tavern or any other form of liquor merchant operating within the Centre.
Comment
The proposed Structure Plan only puts in place the detailed zoning of the land, it does not provide for specific land uses. These will be considered in the context of a development application. It should be noted however that a “Liquor Store” is a permitted land use in the Commercial zone and if an application was received for this use once the structure plan was finalised, it could not be rejected on the basis of the use being incompatible. A “Tavern” is also a discretionary use in the Commercial zone and could therefore be accommodated if considered appropriate.
Recommendation
That the issue be dismissed.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan has been processed in accordance with the requirements set out in Part 9 of DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this Structure Plan is consistent with Goal 2 of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and the provision of quality services and infrastructure.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2, RESOLVES that the draft Darch Neighbourhood Centre Local Structure Plan No. 51, as submitted by Development Planning Strategies on behalf of Stockland and Robinson Investments Pty Ltd, and as outlined on Attachment 3 to this report, is satisfactory.
2. FORWARDS three copies of the Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification.
3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No.2, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the Structure Plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission.
4. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submission received on this Structure Plan for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitter of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of
8
DARCH NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRE
lOCAL structure plan no. 51
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 2 of 8
PART 1 - STATUTORY PLANNING SECTION
This Structure Plan shall apply to the Darch Neighbourhood Centre, on Lots 98 and 9028 Kingsway, Darch, being the land contained within the inner edge of the broken black line shown on the Zoning Plan (Plan No. 1).
This Structure Plan comprises the:
a) Statutory section (Part 1);
b) Explanatory section (Part 2);
3.0 Interpretation
The words and expressions used in this Structure Plan shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Scheme.
4.0 Operation Date
In accordance with sub-clause 9.8.1 of the Scheme, this Structure Plan shall come into operation on the date it is adopted by the Commission.
5.0 Relationship With The Scheme
In accordance with clause 9.8 of the Scheme:
a) The provisions, standards and requirements specified under Part 1 of this Structure Plan shall have the same force and effect as if it were a provision, standard or requirement of the Scheme. Part 2 of this Structure
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3 of 8
b) Plan is for explanatory purposes only in order to provide a descriptive analysis of the Structure Plan.
c) In the event of there being any inconsistencies or conflict between the provisions, standards or requirements of the Scheme and the provisions, standards or requirements of this Structure Plan, then the provisions, standards or requirements of the Scheme shall prevail.
6.0 ZONES AND RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CODES
The Zoning Plan (Plan 1) and Residential Density Code Plan (Plan 2) delineate and depict the zones and residential density codes applicable to the structure plan area according to the legend thereon.
The zones and residential density codes designated under this structure plan apply to the land within it as if the zones and residential density codes were incorporated in the Scheme.
All provisions, standards and requirements applicable to the zones and residential density codes in the Scheme shall apply, unless specific provision is made to the contrary in this Structure Plan.
7.0 Retail Nett Lettable Area
The maximum permitted Retail Net Lettable Area for the Darch Neighbourhood Centre shall not exceed 3,550m2.
8.0 General Provisions
8.1 Commercial
Objectives
The general objectives of this zone shall be in accordance with those contained in the Scheme for the “Commercial Zone”.
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 4 of 8
Use Permissibility
Land Use permissibility within this zone shall be in accordance with the Commercial Zone under the Scheme.
Provisions
In addition to any standards and requirements applicable under the Scheme, the standards and requirements applicable within this zone are:
a) A “landmark” building shall be constructed on the corner of Kingsway and Carlingford Drive, as depicted on “Plan 1”. The “landmark” building shall have special building elevation and window treatments that draw attention to the location, including such means as distinctive roof form, articulation of corner wall elements, entry forecourts, materials and colour;
b) The Neighbourhood Centre shall be developed as a fully integrated centre, with car parking, access, levels, built form and services being designed to integrate land uses throughout the centre;
c) All development and built form must relate to its surrounds and incorporate an active external facade which addresses the car parking areas, external street and adjacent footpaths. All buildings shall maximise openings and entry points, have continuous awnings or a pedestrian colonnade on its external wall and facilitate footpath trading areas where possible;
d) A contribution towards the upgrade of Kingsway, including the construction of a dual use path where Kingsway adjoins the site, will be required as part of any development or subdivision of the site;
e) Development or subdivision of land within the Neighbourhood Centre shall be subject to payment of Infrastructure Contributions, pursuant to Part 10 of the Scheme (East Wanneroo Planning and Developer Contributions Arrangements – Cells 1 to 8);
f) An integrated community purposes site no less than 5000m2 in area is to be well integrated into the overall design of the centre. This land is to be set aside for future acquisition by the City, pursuant to Part 10 of the Scheme;
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 5 of 8
g) The exact location and shape of the community purpose site is to be determined at the development application stage, but must be capable of accommodating a unit of no less than 600m2 NLA with an external façade and entry doors facing either Kingsway or Ashdale Boulevard, plus associated car parking and servicing; and
h) Residential development shall be limited to no more than 20% of the total site area of the Neighbourhood Centre, provided that the design of the residential development is well integrated with the Centre design and only occurs either in conjunction with or after the Centre development.
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 6 of 8
CERTIFIED THAT AGREED STRUCTURE PLAN NO. 51.
WAS ADOPTED BY
RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING
COMMISSION ON ………………………………
………………………………………………………
Chairperson, Western Australian
Planning Commission
AND BY
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WANNEROO ON …………………………….
AND THE SEAL OF THE MUNICIPALITY WAS PURSUANT
TO THE COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION HEREUNTO AFFIXED IN THE
PRESENCE OF:
……………………………………………………….
Mayor, City of Wanneroo
………………………………………………………..
Chief Executive Officer, City of Wanneroo
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 7 of 8 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 8 of 8
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0069V01
File Name: BAProposed Local Structure Plan for Lot 505 Pederick Road Neerabup.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 5 Approval by shb Date 26 August 2004
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 3
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a proposed Local Structure Plan (LSP) for Lot 505 (87) Pederick Road, Neerabup.
Applicant |
BSD Consultants |
Owner |
Mindarie Regional Council (under contract from N, S and H Trandos) |
Location |
Lot 505 (87) Pederick Road, Neerabup |
Site Area |
20.0278ha |
MRS Zoning |
Industrial |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Industrial Development |
Background
The purpose of the Local Structure Plan for Lot 505 Pederick Road is to facilitate the development of a Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) by the Mindarie Regional Council (MRC) on the western portion of Lot 505 (approximately 10 hectares). The Resource Recovery Facility is intended to provide an alternative means of waste disposal than current landfill operations at Tamala Park. The facility is proposed to use biological treatment processes. Gasification and combustion alternatives having been excluded due to strong community opposition.
Lot 505 is located within the Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA), which is the subject of a separate draft Structure Plan. The Neerabup Industrial Area Structure Plan is at an advanced stage in the assessment process, however, it is unlikely to be finalised in time to meet the timeframe for the development of the RRF. The MRC propose to call tenders in September 2004 for the development of the RRF with construction commencing in early 2005. Consequently, BSD Consultants on behalf of the MRC has prepared a Local Structure Plan for Lot 505 Pederick Road, Neerabup to facilitate development of the western portion of the site.
The MRC has developed a Community Partnership Agreement in conjunction with undertaking a Public Environmental Review (PER), representing a commitment by the MRC to work with the community to ensure that its issues and concerns are understood and acted upon. The Community Partnership Agreement is a summary document that identifies the agreed outcomes and impacts of the project relative to the social issues and the PER addresses the potential impacts of the various technologies and also includes the specific assessment of the subject site.
The RRF proposal was submitted to the EPA in December 2002 and the level of assessment set at PER. The PER was released for an 8 week comment period closing 22 March 2004. Council considered the PER at its meeting of 16 March 2004 (item PD12-03/04 refers). The EPA has assessed the submissions on the PER and released Bulletin 1142 that provides the recommendations of the EPA in regards to the RRF proposal and includes a list of commitments by the MRC.
Detail
Proposal
The structure plan area comprises 20.0278 hectares of land and is located within the Neerabup Industrial Area. A plan indicating the location of the subject land in the context of the NIA Structure Plan is included as Attachment 1.
The key elements of the proposed structure plan are:
1. Creation of two precincts:
a) General Industrial (10ha);
b) Bush Forever (10.0278ha); and
2. Realignment of the north-south road to the western boundary of the subject land which is depicted at the interface of the industrial and bush forever precincts of the Neerabup Industrial Area Structure Plan.
The Local Structure Plan is not intended to undermine the intent of the NIA Structure Plan, but to facilitate the development of a RRF on the western portion of Lot 505 prior to endorsement of the NIA. A similar Structure Plan for the Laminated Veneer Lumber Facility at Pederick Road was adopted to facilitate timely development of this major regional facility, and it is considered that similar circumstances apply in this instance.
The Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) will provide an alternative means of waste disposal to current landfill operations at Tamala Park. The facility will initially be capable of treating up to 100,000 tonnes of waste a year and ultimately is expected to treat about 300,000 tonnes of waste each year generated by approximately 500,000 people living in the MRC’s seven (7) member Local Government areas. It is expected that the waste will be converted into highly-refined compost and a portion of output could also be converted into “green” energy. As such, the RRF should be regarded as a major regional facility.
In terms of future employment generation, it is expected that during construction of the RRF and associated infrastructure on the site that 50 to 100 people will be directly employed. At the operation stage, it is expected that 15 to 30 people will be permanently employed to operate the facility.
A copy of the statutory section of the proposed Structure Plan is included as Attachment 2. A complete copy of the proponents report has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Planning Context
The whole of Lot 505 and surrounding land within the NIA is zoned Industrial under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and Industrial Development under District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2).
The objectives of the Industrial Development zone are to:
a) designate land for future industrial development;
b) provide for the orderly and comprehensive planning and development of large areas of industrial land for industrial and employment purposes;
c) enable planning to be flexible and responsive to changing circumstances throughout the development stages of the area.
Clause 3.15.3 of DPS2 requires an Agreed Structure Plan to be prepared and adopted under the provisions of Part 9 of the Scheme prior to subdivision or other development occurring within the zone.
An overall Structure Plan has been prepared to guide the future development of the Neerabup Industrial Area, however this is yet to be endorsed by the WAPC. The Council has adopted the Structure Plan and forwarded it to the WAPC, who have requested certain modifications to be made, including the incorporation of a table that clearly outlines infrastructure works that require landowner contributions.
The draft NIA Structure Plan identifies the western portion of the subject site and immediate surrounding sites as General Industrial. In terms of the eastern half of Lot 505, the Structure Plan identifies the land as a ‘Bush Forever Site Subject to Negotiation’. Where land is earmarked for industrial development, Bush Forever will seek to enter into Strategic Negotiated Planning Solutions (NPS), which promotes the protection of Bush Forever sites (in their entirety if possible) from development proposals that result in the direct loss of bushland through planning and environmental approvals. The implementation status of the Bush Forever sites in the NIA are “to be determined”, which requires further discussion and liaison between landowners and the State Government.
The draft NIA Structure Plan also shows a “Mandatory Road Interface to Open Space” (referred to as the North-South Road, Road G) through the middle of the subject site. The proposed road also continues south of Lot 505. The proposed road is intended to “protect” the Bush Forever site from industrial uses developed on adjoining land.
The draft NIA Structure Plan also deals with final surface contours, servicing of the area and will address infrastructure contribution arrangements.
Consultation
DPS2 requires that all new structure plans be publicly advertised, prior to Council considering adoption of the plan. Given the advertising that has already occurred in respect to the draft NIA Structure Plan and the PER, an advertising period of 21 days is recommended. This should be undertaken by way of an onsite advertising sign, an advertisement in the local newspaper and on the City’s website and letters being sent to affected and nearby landowners.
Comment
The proposed structure plan is generally consistent with the draft NIA Structure Plan. The land use precincts proposed are consistent, being ‘General Industrial’ for the western portion of the site and ‘Bush Forever Site 295’ on the eastern portion of the site. The main difference between the NIA Structure Plan and the Local Structure Plan for Lot 505 is the proposed relocation of the North-South Road that currently divides the site.
Bush Forever Site 295
The MRC have indicated that they are committed to protecting and managing the Bush Forever site to create a landmark Environmental Park of considerable long term value to Western Australia. The MRC consider the Bush Forever Site as a positive component of the NIA Structure Plan by forming a buffer between the proposed RRF and uses to the east (ie. Wanneroo Golf Course). The MRC propose native landscaping in the western portion of the site to integrate with the Bush Forever site to produce an Environmental Park to be managed by the landowner and that management of the vegetation on the site will minimise the boundary impacts on the Bush Forever site.
MRC intend to maintain the Bush Forever site’s conservation values and confirmed, as a result of the PER process, that the RRF will not impact on the Bush Forever site. The proponent has indicated that at a recent meeting with Bush Forever staff, it was confirmed that no public access is intended to the Bush Forever site, due to its relative isolation and significant vegetation and fauna.
Through the PER process, it has been established that a Construction Environmental Management Plan and an Environmental Management System are to be prepared and implemented by the proponent. These have been included as key commitments endorsed by the EPA and will address in detail the measures that will be undertaken by the MRC to protect the Bush Forever site during the construction and operation phases of the RRF. Long term land ownership of the Bush Forever site has not been determined and no arrangements have been made at this stage.
The Bush Forever Office of DPI support the commitments of the MRC and are satisfied that sufficient measures will be in place through the Construction Environment Management Plan and Environmental Management System, to ensure ongoing management of the Bush Forever site. Provisions to require the preparation and implementation of these studies should be included in the structure plan text. Future negotiations between the proponent and the WAPC will occur separately to the structure plan assessment regarding the long term management and ownership of the Bush Forever site.
North-South Road
The proponent seeks to vary from the NIA Structure Plan by relocating the North-South Road (Road G) to the western boundary of Lot 505. The main implications of this proposal are:
a) The Mandatory Road Interface to Open Space to the eastern boundary of the Bush Forever Site is deleted restricting public access to the site;
b) The southern portion of the north-south road, which traverses Lot 2477, is disconnected from Pederick Road and may potentially impact on traffic circulation throughout the greater industrial area;
c) The relocation will create a 4 way intersection on Pederick Road; and
d) Lot 508 will now be required to contribute a half share arrangement for land requirements associated with construction of the north-south road; and
The justification provided by the proponent for the road realignment is as follows:
· The North-South Road (ie. “Mandatory Road Interface to Open Space) has been included in its current location on the NIA Structure Plan based on principles of management for public open space for residential subdivision and has limited relevance to the protection of a Bush Forever site. The North-South Road is not required as a buffer for the Bush Forever site and could in fact be more harmful to the site’s protection than helpful as it provides a means for public access that is not required. In addition, the protection of the Bush Forever site's flora and fauna could be jeopardised by the construction of a road that exposes the site to noxious plant and feral animal species that could harm the site’s significant habitat.
· An existing embankment along the western boundary of the Bush Forever site would make road construction more difficult and expensive with the requirement for extensive batters. The North-South Road in its current location is also not equitable as it would only service industrial development on one side of the proposed road.
· The relocation of the North-South Road, with a 20m road width, to the western boundary of Lot 505 will provide sufficient road connectivity and access to the site. The NIA Structure Plan provides a conceptual road layout over the subject site and adjoining land. The proposed road movement network of the NIA structure plan is expected to be reviewed and refined over time at the subdivision stage. In this case, it has already been identified that the location of the North-South Road is unsuitable. Any potential 4 way intersection can be dealt with in accordance with principles outlined in the NIA Structure Plan (refer to Section 7.4.2.1).
· The proposed relocation of the North-South Road to the western boundary of Lot 505 will be more efficient and equitable in terms of servicing more general industrial land. The relocation maintains the key principle of developing a grid road structure throughout the NIA to maximise permeability and manoeuvrability.
The relocation of the road has been supported by the Bush Forever Office and DPI, however DPI has advised that the Structure Plan needs to demonstrate how this road will extend to Flynn Drive, given that the WAPC has requested that the major road network shown in figure 7.2 of the draft NIA Structure Plan be incorporated in the statutory section of that Structure Plan. Further, DPI has not agreed to a 20 metres road width, rather Road G should have a minimum road width of 35 metres, and any development on the site set back to allow for this.
The relocation of the road will create a 4-way intersection, which has not been adequately addressed in terms of its impact on the road network, ie. any additional land requirements and intersection treatment.
The City’s preference is for four way intersections to be avoided wherever possible. Also, the impact on the adjacent landowner (Lot 508) who is unimpeded by north south roads in the NIA Structure Plan and is now required to provide a land contribution for the road reserve, has not been addressed.
The information provided lacks sufficient justification to support the realignment of this road, at this point in time. The following matters will need to be addressed to further assess the impact of the realignment of this road:
· Details of any discussions held with adjacent landowners regarding the impact of the new north south road on their land parcel and if possible agreement to the relocation.
· The impact of repositioning the road will need to be substantiated through a detailed plan addressing future road levels, interface and integration with adjacent land parcels.
· How will the four (4) way intersection be addressed and what arrangements will be made to allow for the intersection, ie land requirements, intersection treatments, funding arrangements.
· A traffic study to determine the impact on the road network, including traffic flow, numbers, treatments required etc.
· Details on the timing and construction of Pederick Road; and
· Infrastructure contributions and arrangements proposed.
These matters can be further addressed and considered during the advertising period. This however should not be construed as support of the realignment.
Pederick Road Widening and Infrastructure Contributions
The proponent reports that the upgrading of Pederick Road is dealt with in the draft NIA Structure Plan and that based on the lower vehicle projections for Pederick Road, in comparison to Road E (west of Orchid Road), it is proposed that Pederick Road be developed to the local road standard that requires a 20m road reserve.
Advice received to date from DPI indicates that the minimum road reserve width for Pederick Road is a minimum of 35m. The proposed structure plan has made no provision for the widening of Pederick Road nor addressed infrastructure contributions which will be required for the major road network and preparation of additional plans and studies pursuant to the NIA Structure Plan. It is recommended that the last paragraph on Page 10 of the Structure Plan Explanatory Report (regarding Pederick Road) be deleted and that an additional provision be included in the Part 1 document under Special Provisions to ensure the landowner is responsible for any requirement for widening of Pederick Road at no cost to Council and other infrastructure contribution requirements pursuant to the NIA Structure Plan and any subsequent related amendment to DPS2.
Other Matters
A zoning plan reflecting a “General Industrial” zoning on the western portion of the Lot and a “Bush Forever Precinct” on the eastern Portion of the Lot has not been provided and is required in addition to the Structure Plan map. It is recommended that the zoning plan be prepared and included in the Part 1 document prior to advertising.
Upon reviewing the Administration report, the applicant has written to the City seeking, in particular, that advertising for the structure plan be waived in this instance and in fact offering to modify the proposal to make it entirely consistent with the NIA structure plan to achieve this objective. The applicant has also advised of its concern over several road and traffic related items in the Administration recommendation. A full copy of the applicant’s letter is included as Attachment 3. The rationale for the Administration recommendation is set out in this report and it is not recommended that it change as a result of the applicant’s submission.
Summary
The proposed structure plan is generally consistent with the NIA Structure Plan. The land use precincts proposed are consistent, being ‘General Industrial’ for the western portion of the site and ‘Bush Forever Site 295’ on the eastern portion of the site. The main difference between the NIA Structure Plan and the Proposed Structure Plan is the realignment of the north-south road (Road G). Prior to the City supporting the proposed realignment of this road, a number of matters will need to be addressed and can be further investigated during the advertising period. However, it is recommended that modifications to the Part 1 Statutory Planning Section related to provision of a Zoning Plan, and addressing any Pederick Road widening and infrastructure contribution requirements will be required prior to advertising.
Administration therefore recommends that Council should not advertise the Structure Plan until modifications to the Part 1 Statutory Planning Section related to provision of a Zoning Plan, and addressing any Pederick Road widening and infrastructure contribution requirements are made and upon those matters being addressed advertise the Structure Plan for a period of 21 days during which time the outstanding matters related to the north-south road are to be further investigated.
Statutory Compliance
Clause 9.4.1 of DPS2 provides that in considering a Structure Plan, Council may exercise its discretion and determine that it is satisfactory for public advertising, that it should not be advertised until certain specified matters have been included or otherwise attended to by the proponent or that the Structure Plan should not be agreed to for stated reasons.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this Structure Plan is consistent with the goal of providing Healthy Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan and in particular Strategy 2.2 of the Planning and Development Directorate Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide a cohesive system of integrated land use planning.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 DETERMINES that the proposed Lot 505 Pederick Road Neerabup Local Structure Plan, as submitted by BSD Consultants on behalf of the Mindarie Regional Council and as outlined on Attachment 2 to this report, should not be advertised until the following specified matters have been included in the Structure Plan documentation or have otherwise been attended to by the proponent:
a) The addition of a zoning plan in the Statutory section of the structure plan reflecting a “General Industrial” zoning on the western portion of the Lot and a “Bush Forever Precinct” on the eastern portion of the Lot.
b) The last paragraph on Page 10 of the Structure Plan Explanatory Report being deleted;
c) Provision 8.2 in the Statutory section of the structure plan being modified to require the preparation and implementation of a Construction Environmental Management Plan and an Environmental Management System by the proponent as part of the development approval process to address in detail the measures that will be undertaken to protect the Bush Forever site during the development and ongoing use of the site; and
d) An additional provision in the Statutory section of the structure plan to ensure the landowner is responsible for any widening required for Pederick Road at no cost to Council and for infrastructure contribution requirements pursuant to the NIA Structure Plan and any other subsequent related amendment to DPS2.
2. Upon the matters specified in 1, above being included in the Structure Plan documentation or otherwise attended to by the proponent, ADVERTISES the proposed Structure Plan under the provisions of Clause 9.5.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 for a period of 21 days.
3. ADVISES the proponent that prior to Council’s consideration of the proposed Structure Plan for adoption, it will require the following matters to be satisfactorily addressed:
a) A traffic impact statement being prepared and submitted to the City to address the following matters:
i) Traffic generation and movement in the locality, particularly demonstrating a suitable extension of the proposed relocated north-south road (Road G) to Flynn Drive.
ii) Treatment of the four (4) way intersection and any corresponding land requirements needed to allow for the intersection.
b) Details on the timing, construction and width of Pederick Road and the width of the relocated north-south road.
c) Provision of a detailed plan addressing future road levels of the proposed relocated north-south road (Road G) and interface with adjacent land parcels;
d) Details of any discussions held with adjacent landowners regarding the impact of road on their land parcel and if possible agreement to the relocation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of
4
PART 1 - STATUTORY PLANNING SECTION
1.0 STRUCTURE PLAN AREA
This Structure Plan shall apply to Lot 505 on Diagram 59948, Volume 1863 and Folio 912, Pederick Road, Neerabup, being the land contained within the inner edge of the broken black line shown on the Structure Plan map (Plan No. 1).
2.0 STRUCTURE PLAN CONTENT
This Structure Plan comprises the:
a) Statutory section (Part 1);
b) Explanatory section (Part 2);
3.0 INTERPRETATION
The words and expressions used in this Structure Plan shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Scheme.
4.0 OPERATION DATE
In accordance with sub-clause 9.8.1 of the Scheme, this Structure Plan shall come into operation on the date it is adopted by the WA Planning Commission.
5.0 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE SCHEME
In accordance with clause 9.8 of the Scheme:
a) The provisions, standards and requirements specified under Part 1 of this Structure Plan shall have the same force and effect as if it were a provision, standard or requirement of the Scheme. Part 2 of this Structure Plan is for explanatory purposes only in order to provide a descriptive analysis of the Structure Plan.
b) In the event of there being any inconsistencies or conflict between the provisions, standards or requirements of the Scheme and the provisions, standards or requirements of this Structure Plan, then the provisions, standards or requirements of the Scheme shall prevail.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2
of 4
6.0 LOCAL STRUCTURE PLAN MAP
The Local Structure Plan Map (Plan 1) delineates and depicts the road structure and land use precincts proposed for the Structure Plan area. The map defines the following road and land use precincts:
1. General Industrial
2. Bush Forever Site 295
3. Proposed N-S Road (20m width).
7.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.1 General Industrial
Land use permissibility and intent within this precinct shall be in accordance with the General Industrial Zone under the Scheme. Notwithstanding the uses permitted under the Scheme, Industry – Hazardous shall be an ‘X’ use in this precinct.
8.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
8.1 Proposed North-South Road (20m width)
The Structure Plan provides for the relocation of the proposed North-South Road to the western boundary of Lot 505. The proposed road will be centrally located over Lots 508 and 505 with a total road width of 20m. The future extension of the road will be subject to further investigation by landowners to the south.
8.2 Bush Forever Site 295
The eastern portion of Lot 505 as shown on the Structure Plan will be retained as a Bush Forever site. The site will be managed by the Mindarie Regional Council as an Environmental Park in accordance with adopted commitments by the EPA through the Public Environmental Review.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFIED THAT AGREED STRUCTURE PLAN ……………….
WAS ADOPTED BY
RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING
COMMISSION ON ………………………………
………………………………………………………
Chairperson, Western Australian
Planning Commission
AND BY
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WANNEROO ON …………………………….
AND THE SEAL OF THE MUNICIPALITY WAS PURSUANT
TO THE COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION HEREUNTO AFFIXED IN THE
PRESENCE OF:
……………………………………………………….
Mayor, City of Wanneroo
………………………………………………………..
Chief Executive Officer, City of Wanneroo
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R34/0064V01
File Name: DARequested Closure of Pedestrian Access Way Between Lalina Way and Civic Drive Wanneroo .doc This line will not be
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by T NEale Date 04 August 2004printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: T Neale
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 1
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the permanent closure of a pedestrian access way (PAW) between Lalina Way and Civic Drive, Wanneroo.
Background
An application has been received from the owners of the adjoining properties for the permanent closure of the PAW between Lalina Way and Civic Drive, Wanneroo. The closure has been requested on the grounds of anti-social behaviour that is said to occur within or near the PAW. The incidents complained off include breaking and entering, theft, damage to property and vehicles, harassment, and unruly behaviour.
Detail
The request for closure has been examined in accordance with Council’s Pedestrian Access Way Planning Policy and is considered under the following headings:
(a) Role of the PAW in the neighbourhood
Lalina Way and Civic Drive are local roads in a wholly residential neighbourhood.
(b) Access to community facilities and services
The bus stops on the Civic Drive route are easily reached by use of the local road network without a significant increase in walking distance.
A small passive park (Jindinga Park) on the west side of Civic Drive is the only community facility in the immediate locality. The Wanneroo Library, Aquamotion aquatic centre and the Wanneroo shopping centre are located to the north on Civic Drive. East Wanneroo Primary School and Wanneroo High School are to the east as shown on Attachment 1.
Closure of the PAW will result in an increased walking distance to these facilities of only 20 metres.
(c) Anti-social behaviour considerations
The level of anti-social behaviour in or near the PAW appears to be at the lower end of the scale when compared with the incidents reported in other PAWs in the locality, however some of the adjoining residents are elderly and the anti-social activity is distressing to them.
(d) Access for the disabled and seniors
The residents of Lalina Way are the only potential users who might gain a benefit from the link the PAW provides to Civic Drive. However, the street network provides an almost equally convenient route to all facilities.
(e) Availability of alternative access routes
The adjoining streets are well serviced with footpaths and lighting and do not involve any significant increase in walking distance to local facilities.
(f) Importance to the pathway system and the Wanneroo Bike Plan
The PAW is not an important link in the pedestrian and cyclist network of the locality.
(g) Alternatives to closure of the PAW
The PAW is four metres wide and is fenced on both sides for its full length. Each of the adjoining properties has a dwelling that is oriented to the street frontage. There is no scope for redeveloping the properties without first demolishing the existing dwellings. The PAW has adequate street lighting.
(h) Comments from State Government Agencies
The Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) has stated it does not object to the closure as the PAW does not form part of a cycle/pedestrian network and the closure is unlikely to impact significantly on journeys to local facilities as there are alternative routes.
A storm water drainage line is located in the PAW and if closure is approved, this is to be protected by the granting of an easement to the City. There are no other public utilities that will be affected by the closure.
(i) Comments from residents and other users of the PAW
The residents of all the adjoining properties support the closure of the PAW.
The request for closure was advertised in the local papers and a period of 35 days allowed for the lodging of submissions. Signs were placed at either end of the PAW inviting comment within that same period and a letter with response form enclosed was sent to 59 households in Lalina Way and Civic Drive.
There were objections received from six residents in four households in Lalina Way and Civic Drive.
Submissions of support for closure were received from 24 residents (other than the adjoining property owners) in 13 households in those streets.
The objections were based on longer travel distances to public transport and schools and the loss of a shortcut for seniors to local destinations.
Most of the submissions of support did not give a reason. Some expressed concern that the PAW provides a venue for drug taking and alcohol consumption and serves as an escape route for offenders. Incidents of unlawful entry, theft and damage, unruly behaviour, obscene language, graffiti and general littering were also cited.
Comment
The PAW is not required as a strategic pedestrian or cyclist route. If the PAW is closed there are adequate alternative street routes that do not involve any significant increase in travel distance to any public facility. Closure of the PAW is therefore unlikely to impact significantly on journeys to local facilities and pedestrian movement within the locality.
Statutory Compliance
Closure of the PAW will be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997, and in accordance with the Department for Planning and Infrastructure procedures.
Strategic Implications
Closure of the subject PAW is consistent with the Healthy Communities goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to provide and maintain infrastructure to meet the needs of our citizens and also support safe and secure communities.
Policy Implications
The closure of the subject PAW is consistent with the objectives of the City’s Pedestrian Access Planning Policy
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council SUPPORTS the permanent closure of the pedestrian access way between Lalina Way and Civic Drive, Wanneroo subject to the whole of the land in the access way being amalgamated with adjoining private properties and the owners thereof meeting all costs associated with the closure and amalgamation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0009V01
File Name: FADevelopment Applications determined by Delegated Authority for July 2004.doc This line will not be printed Please do
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by hw Date 10 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by hw Date 10 August 2004NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Casimir Penheiro
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 1
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Development Applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 July 2004 and 31 July 2004, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.
Background
Nil
Detail
The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with development approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Planning Codes (R Codes).
The City of Wanneroo continues to experience very rapid growth pressures. Since the commencement of 2004, the city has received over 70 development applications on average per month in addition to an average of over 570 building license applications.
Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on development applications to certain officers in Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.
The Administration, in assessing development proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual development application.
Development applications determined by Planning & Development between 1 July 2004 and 31 July 2004, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in the attached Schedule 1.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 12 August 2003 (item CE05-08/03 refers). The decisions referred to in schedule 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.
Strategic Implications
This report is consistent with the corporate management and development goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in schedule 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the determinations made by Planning & Development Services acting under delegated authority from Council on development applications processed between 1 July 2004 and 31 July 2004.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0219 02/04/2004 CHRISTINE M HUME & JAMES HUME 32 $1,000.00 Approved
Prop address 356 SYDNEY ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 148 D 70466 Vol 1750 Fol 575
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - CLEARING 2.2 HECTARES FOR VEGETABLES
Applicants J HUME, CM HUME
File Number P12/0175V01
DA04/0298 11/05/2004 IAN R AINSWORTH & ZAINAB B MOHAMAD 37 $2,400.00 Refused
Prop address 5 JAMES STREET MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 26 DP 222778 Vol 1160 Fol 878
Description SINGLE HOUSE - CARPORT ADDITION
Applicants P DOVEN
File Number P20/0045V01
DA04/0446 02/07/2004 GARY C DE PIAZZI & KATHLEEN M DE PIAZZI 13 $17,500.00 Approved
Prop address 9 BUSHLAND RETREAT CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot 37 P 12964 Vol 1545 Fol 544
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants ESE PATIOS AND HOME IMPROVEMENTS
File Number P07/0405V01
DA04/0439 29/06/2004 CARL L DILETTI 13 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 34 WINSHIP AVENUE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 43 P 9589 Vol 1872 Fol 078
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SERVICES
Applicants TC DILETTI
File Number P34/1898V01
DA04/0228 06/04/2004 QUITO PTY LTD 76 $69,090.90 Approved
Prop address 51 GRIFFITHS ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065
Land Lot 12 D 71019 Vol 1753 Fol 452
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - SHADEHOUSE ADDTION
Applicants JBT CORP
File Number P29/0017V01
DA04/0310 12/05/2004 PEET & COMPANY LTD 56 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 289 PINJAR ROAD TAPPING WA 6065
Land Lot 2706 DP 230239 Vol 1035 Fol 069
Description USE NOT LISTED - ESTATE SIGNAGE (7 IN TOTAL)
Applicants JENKIN ADVERTISING & MARKETING
File Number P31/0330V01
DA04/0429 21/06/2004 PEET & COMPANY LTD 29 $1,400,000.00 Approved
Prop address 289 PINJAR ROAD TAPPING WA 6065
Land Lot 2706 DP 230239 Vol 1035 Fol 069
Description USE NOT LISTED - CLEARING AND BULK EARTHWORKS - ASHTON HEIGHTS
Applicants DEVELOPMENT PLANNING STRATEGIES
File Number P31/0330V01
DA04/0342 26/05/2004 QUITO PTY LTD 40 $36,364.00 Approved
Prop address 60 VINCENT ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065
Land Lot 20 P 8404 Vol 1305 Fol 577
Description RURAL INDUSTRY - PACKING AND DESPATCH SHED ADDITION
Applicants JBT CORP
File Number P29/0111V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0226 05/04/2004 QUITO PTY LTD 77 $18,180.00 Approved
Prop address 60 VINCENT ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065
Land Lot 20 P 8404 Vol 1305 Fol 577
Description INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE - PLASTIC COVER IGLOO ADDITION
Applicants JBT CORP
File Number P/0028V01
DA04/0315 18/05/2004 QUITO PTY LTD 46 $18,180.00 Approved
Prop address 80 VINCENT ROAD SINAGRA WA 6065
Land Lot 19 P 8404 Vol 6 Fol 195A
Description RURAL INDUSTRY - ADDITIONS TO EXISTING SHED
Applicants JBT CORP
File Number P29/0020V01
DA04/0222 05/04/2004 BIAGGIO VERSACI & TINA VERSACI 84 $20,000.00 Approved
Prop address 47 BUCKINGHAM DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 141 P 12576 Vol 1517 Fol 532
Description VEHICLE SALES/HIRE PREMISES -VEHICLE WASH DOWN AREA AND METAL ROOF
Applicants H.S. HYDE & SON
File Number P33/0027V01
DA04/0165 16/03/2004 BIAGGIO VERSACI & TINA VERSACI 79 $23,500.00 Approved
Prop address 47 BUCKINGHAM DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 141 P 12576 Vol 1517 Fol 532
Description CHANGE OF USE - WAREHOUSE TO VEHICLE SALES/HIRE PREMISES
Applicants RAY WHITE REAL ESTATE - COMMERCIAL
File Number P33/0027V01
DA04/0404 14/06/2004 MARGARET J BORRELLO & CARMELO BORRELLO 30 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 57 GREENHAVEN GLADE CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot 128 D 72335 Vol 2021 Fol 335
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - OFFICE/ ADMINISTRATION ONLY
Applicants MJ BORRELLO, C BORRELLO
File Number P07/0976V01
DA04/0442 01/07/2004 DENNIS H KELLY 14 $9,290.00 Approved
Prop address (service road access) 1954 WANNEROO ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031
Land Lot 37 P 8548 Vol 82 Fol 136A
Description SINGLE DWELLING - PATIO ADDITIONS
Applicants Sunset Outdoor
File Number P23/0016V01
DA04/0470 13/07/2004 LEIGH W CLIFTON & PIETERNELLA D CLIFTON 12 $7,210.00 Approved
Prop address 201 ROUSSET ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 2287 DP 124823 Vol 1641 Fol 388
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED EXTENSION (EXISTING)
Applicants PD CLIFTON
File Number P20/0154v01
DA04/0176 22/03/2004 JEREMY N THOMPSON & LEITH P THOMPSON 77 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 89 GOLFVIEW PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 61 D 78994 Vol 1895 Fol 065
Description STABLES - ARENA FOR HORSE EXERCISES
Applicants JN THOMPSON, LP THOMPSON
File Number P12/012V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0407 15/06/2004 SARAH DOUGHTY & DAVID DOUGHTY 23 $3,000.00 Approved
Prop address 9 CLUBHOUSE LANE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 142 P 16140 Vol 1786 Fol 468
Description SINGLE HOUSE - OUTBUILDING
Applicants D DOUGHTY
File Number P12/0127V01
DA04/0454 05/07/2004 WESTON LIVING PTY LTD 19 $200,000.00 Approved
Prop address 295 KINGSWAY DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 32 P 6439 Vol 1181 Fol 598
Description GROUPED DWELLING - ADDITIONAL 2 UNITS
Applicants WESTON LIVING PTY LTD
File Number P09/0481V01
DA04/0215 31/03/2004 MARIA D'UVA & ANGELO D'UVA 35 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address 440 BADGERUP ROAD GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 6 D 26040 Vol 1248 Fol 369
Description INDUSTRY RURAL - RELOCATION OF SHED
Applicants P.A. CAPE CONSTRUCTION CO
File Number P12/0174V01
DA04/0403 14/06/2004 MOYA G WOOD 27 $100,000.00 Approved
Prop address MEDICAL/VETERINARY CENTRE 44 GREENPARK ROAD ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA
Land Lot 5481 D 57377 Vol 1702 Fol 598
Description MEDICAL CENTRE - ADDITIONS
Applicants MG WOOD
File Number P01/0918V01
DA02/1464.01 05/07/2004 AUSTRALAND HOLDINGS LTD 2 $5,300.00 Approved
Prop address 5 CALABRESE AVENUE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 46 DP 29137 Vol 1698 Fol 400
Description GROUPED DWELLING - ADDITION OF TWO CARPARKING BAYS
Applicants C LEWIS
File Number P34/0315V01
DA04/0012.01 02/06/2004 HOMESWEST RENTALS 36 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 54 CASSERLEY AVENUE GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 973 D 46510
Description GROUP DWELLING - x 6 MINOR AMENDMENTS
Applicants J BLAKE
File Number P11/0893V01
DA04/0072.01 15/06/2004 JENNIFER DUNN 26 $1,644.00 Approved
Prop address SYCAMORE 6/18 GREVILLE WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 6 Vol 2513 Fol 326 S/P 41205
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO
Applicants HERITAGE OUTDOOR LEISURE CENTRE
File Number P11/0308V01
DA04/0498 22/07/2004 JENNIFER A GATES 4 $2,360.00 Approved
Prop address TALLOW ROW 11B SHALFORD WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 10 Vol 2522 Fol 310 S/P 42046
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants COUNTRY LEISURE CENTER
File Number P11/0123V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0445 02/07/2004 DAVID S GOUGH & MICHIKO KOIKE 13 $2,222.00 Approved
Prop address PEPPERMINT GROVE 3 26B CASSERLEY AVENUE GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 7 Vol 1910 Fol 154 S/P 21592
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants WESTRAL OUTDOOR
File Number P11/0090V01
DA04/0393 09/06/2004 CHRISTINE PROCTOR 23 $4,000.00 Approved
Prop address 26A BARNDIE WAY WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 1 Vol 1476 Fol 064 S/P 5102
Description GROUPED DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants MINDARIE PATIOS
File Number P34/1570V01
DA04/0432 22/06/2004 LAURIE BORDAS & TREVOR MILTON 28 $2,530.00 Approved
Prop address WESTBROOK MEWS 6/9 WESTBROOK WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 6 Vol 2559 Fol 258 S/P 44797
Description GROUPED DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants A MCLOUGHLIN
File Number P11/0562V01
DA04/0456 06/07/2004 MICHELLE N MAWHINNEY 11 $2,250.00 Approved
Prop address WESTBROOK MEWS 7/15 WESTBROOK WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 19 Vol 2559 Fol 271 S/P 44797
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants WESTRAL OUTDOOR
File Number P11/0955V01
DA04/0415 18/06/2004 COLIN W DARE & TRUDI J DARE 20 $3,600.00 Approved
Prop address WESTBROOK MEWS 5/17 WESTBROOK WAY GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 24 Vol 2559 Fol 276 S/P 44797
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO TO UNIT 5
Applicants OUTDOOR CENTRE HOLDINGS PTY LTD
File Number P11/0453V01
DA04/0400 11/06/2004 SKYWORKS PTY LTD 25 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 30 BARETTA ROAD WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 290 P 12575 Vol 1517 Fol 506
Description CHANGE OF USE - LIGHT INDUSTRY TO VEHICLE SALES/HIRE PREMISES
Applicants SKYWORKS PTY LTD
File Number P33/0330V01
DA04/0441 01/07/2004 DEBORAH F MAY 21 $5,115.00 Approved
Prop address 17B SHEPWAY PLACE MARANGAROO WA 6064
Land Lot 2 Vol 1689 Fol 981 S/P 12558
Description GROUPED DWELLING - GARAGE/WORKSHOP ADDITION
Applicants QUALITY PATIOS & CARPORTS
File Number P19/1206V01
DA04/0452 05/07/2004 MILLIE Y JANSZ & FRANCISCO VELARDE 18 $3,900.00 Approved
Prop address 8A FARNELL PLACE ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064
Land Lot 1 Vol 1912 Fol 588 S/P 21587
Description GROUP DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants OUTDOORWORLD
File Number P01/0621V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0142 02/03/2004 LUKE A ANTICA 35 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 85 ALDERSEA CIRCLE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 1129 P 18227 Vol 1917 Fol 448
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 3 - SANDART
Applicants LA ANTICA
File Number P08/1010V01
DA04/0492 19/07/2004 AUSTRALASIAN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION LTD 9 $2,000.00 Approved
Prop address 7 AINSBURY PARADE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 66 D 96855
Description PLACE OF WORSHIP - SECURITY LIGHTING
Applicants AUSTRALASIAN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION LTD
File Number P08/0643V01
DA04/0361 31/05/2004 CHISHOLM HOLDINGS PTY LTD 27 $0.00 Approved
Prop address SERVICE STN & SHOPS-PROPOSED 4 HUGHIE EDWARDS DRIVE MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot 1600 D 90123 Vol 2062 Fol 735 S/P 44945
Description CHANGE OF USE - SHOWROOM/WAREHOUSE TO PIZZA TAKEAWAY
Applicants STONEWALL CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number P21/0268V01
DA04/0303 11/05/2004 QUINNS BAPTIST COLLEGE INC 22 $232,000.00 Approved
Prop address QUINNS BAPTIST COLLEGE 8 SALERNO DRIVE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 512 D 97775
Description EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT - ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM BLOCK
Applicants T&Z PTY LTD
File Number P22/0600VO1
DA04/0387 09/06/2004 RAESIDE PTY LTD 29 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address SERVICE STATION 22 ANCHORAGE DRIVE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 971 P 21320
Description SERVICE STATION - SIGNAGE
Applicants GULL PETROLEUM PTY LTD
File Number P22/1210V01
DA04/0451 05/07/2004 ADRIANE BLICKS & SVEN O BLICKS 10 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 4 NEVIS PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 242 P 21484
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - BOWEN MASSAGE
Applicants A BLICKS
File Number P34/1908V01
DA04/0179 19/03/2004 DURKIN ENTERPRISES PTY LTD 70 $0.00 Refused
Prop address 7/11 DELLAMARTA ROAD WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 7 Vol 2097 Fol 057 S/P 32321
Description CHANGE OF USE SHOWROOM/FACTORY TO LIGHT INDUSTRY
Applicants TOPLINE TRUCKWASH &
File Number P33/0248V01
DA04/0354 27/05/2004 CAPRICORN INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LTD 30 $885,000.00 Approved
Prop address 599 TWO ROCKS ROAD YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 303 P 21926 Vol 2097 Fol 795
Description USE NOT LISTED - EARTHWORKS
Applicants COSSILL & WEBLEY PTY LTD
File Number P36/0256V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0406 15/06/2004 ROBERT A WARNER & ROBERTA A WARNER 25 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 31 HONEY STREET MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 15 D 89782 Vol 2114 Fol 844
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO & SHED ADDITION
Applicants J & E INDUSTRIES
File Number P20/0112V01
DA04/0455 05/07/2004 DASFORD HOLDINGS PTY LTD 19 $0.00 Approved
Prop address CLARKSON NEIGHBHD SHOP1 1/30 AINSBURY PARADE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 1 Vol 2127 Fol 530 S/P 34058
Description CHANGE OF USE - HARDWARE STORE TO RECREATION CENTRE (WOMENS GYM)
Applicants P ROBERTS
File Number P08/0279V01
DA04/0485 16/07/2004 LINDA MFC RATO 9 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address 144 PAINI WAY JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Lot 106 P 21843 Vol 2205 Fol 108
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO ADDITION X 2
Applicants LMFC RATO
File Number P14/0048V01
DA04/0389 09/06/2004 TAH LAND PTY LTD 29 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address KINGSWAY CITY SHOPPING CENTRE 168 WANNEROO ROAD MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 888 D 98863
Description SERVICE STATION - SIGNAGE
Applicants J WATTS
File Number P10025V01
DA04/0388 09/06/2004 ALEXANDER HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTRE PTY LTD 23 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address (side street access) ALEXANDER HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTRE & TAVERN 200
Land Lot 1 P 23848
Description SERVICE STATION - SIGNAGE
Applicants GULL PETROLEUM PTY LTD
File Number P01/0252V01
DA04/0462 09/07/2004 ALEXANDER HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTRE PTY LTD 15 $0.00 Approved
Prop address (side street access) ALEXANDER HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTRE & TAVERN 200
Land Lot 1 P 23848
Description CHANGE OF USE - SHOP TO CIVIC BUILDING
Applicants TOTAL PROJECT SOLUTIONS
File Number P01/0252V01
DA04/0477 14/07/2004 KINGFISHER HOLDINGS PTY LTD 12 $0.00 Approved
Prop address MINI MART 2/21 THE BROADVIEW LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 2540 Fol 799 S/P 43073
Description CHANGE OF USE - SHOP TO PHARMACY
Applicants QVS SHOPFITTERS
File Number P17/0192V01
DA04/0467 09/07/2004 PAMELA J GRIMES & ROBIN D MUNCHOW 8 $10,767.00 Approved
Prop address 61 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE TWO ROCKS WA 6037
Land Lot 43 DP 36110 Vol 2541 Fol 712
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants HIGHLINE BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number P32/0300V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0201 26/03/2004 PHOENIX MOTORS 83 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 36 PENSACOLA TERRACE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 100 DP 37158
Description VEHICLE SALES/HIRE PREMIESES - RETROSPECTIVE - PERIMETER FLOODLIGHTING
Applicants MEYER SHIRCORE & ASSOCIATES
File Number P08/1041V01
DA03/1115 11/12/2003 PEET & CO AFT YANCHEP OCEANFRONT UNIT 153 $499,380.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED 154 LAGOON DRIVE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 9003 DP 36923 Vol 2549 Fol 331
Description PARK - POS & DRAINAGE
Applicants MAUNSELL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
File Number P36/0672V01
DA04/0465 09/07/2004 JEANETTE M PARKER 8 $313,513.00 Approved
Prop address 19 MARTINDALE AVENUE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 610 DP 38794 Vol 2555 Fol 052
Description GROUP DWELLING - 3 UNITS
Applicants J CORP
File Number P18/0556V01
DA04/0391 01/06/2004 LANDCORP 16 $250,000.00 Approved
Prop address 6 VENTURE LOOP WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 256 DP 38474 Vol 2554 Fol 804
Description GENERAL INDUSTRIAL - CABINET MAKING
Applicants S PIROVICH
File Number P33/0349V01
DA04/0402 14/06/2004 JNI DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD & AVALON HOLDINGS 17 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 33 INNOVATION CIRCUIT WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 279 DP 38474 Vol 2554 Fol 806
Description CHANGE OF USE - FACTORY UNIT TO PLACE OF WORSHIP
Applicants M RULE
File Number P33/0307V01
DA04/0440 30/06/2004 VESPOLI ENTERPRISES PTY LTD & VES-FOG 21 $230,000.00 Approved
Prop address 16 RIGALI WAY WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 233 DP 38475 Vol 2554 Fol 817
Description WAREHOUSE
Applicants VESPOLI ENTERPRISES PTY LTD
File Number P33/0317V01
DA04/0051 27/01/2004 HOMESWEST 31 $6,850,000.00 Approved
Prop address 5 KINGSBRIDGE BOULEVARD BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 79 DP 35592
Description SHOP, MEDICAL CENTRE, LIQUOR STORE & PHARMACY - BRIGHTON VILLAGE CENTRE
Applicants JONES COULTER YOUNG PTY LTD
File Number P05/1101V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Decision_date BETWEEN 01/07/2004 00:00:00 AND 31/07/2004
Note: Estimated cost not provided on applications for use only or where a flat fee is applicable
Ram Id Date Owners Days Est Cost Decision
DA04/0362 31/05/2004 ROCKLINE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 7 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 35 OCEAN KEYS BOULEVARD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 405 DP 39299 Vol 2564 Fol 287
Description CHANGE OF USE - SHOP/SHOWRROM TO SHOWROOM/WAREHOUSE/EDUCATION
Applicants ROCKLINE PTY LTD
File Number P08/1083V01
DA04/0428 23/06/2004 ALLEN L HUNTER & KATHRYN H HUNTER 26 $216,509.00 Approved
Prop address 1 HURSTHILL STREET MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 400 DP 39574 Vol 2564 Fol 206
Description GROUPED DWELLING - 2 UNITS
Applicants J CORP
File Number P18/0613V01
DA04/0434 28/06/2004 THERESE B MOSELEY 17 $95,377.00 Approved
Prop address 4 KENSINGTON WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 2561 Fol 814 S/P 45603
Description SINGLE HOUSE - STRATA
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number PA18/0013V01
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0008
File Name: FCSubdivision Applications determined under delegated authority during July 2004.doc This line will not be printed Please
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by CH Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 10 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 10 August 2004do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning & Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Chris Hewett
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 21
StartStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Determination of subdivision applications processed in the period for the month of July 2004 under delegated authority.
Detail
The West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.
Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Directorate this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.
Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.
SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).
SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.
SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.
SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.
SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.
SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.
The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority in the period for the month of July 2004.
EndStrip This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTE the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority in the period for the month of July 2004 as listed below:
Subdivision Application Delegations
Att |
WAPC No/ Received Date |
Location / Owner |
DPS2 Zoning LDU Category |
Advice |
WAPC Advised |
1 |
970-04 29.7.04 |
Lot 82 (40) Taywood Drive, Wanneroo H & K Roelofs, B Soto & R A Fidock |
Residential SCU1 |
Supported |
30.7.04 |
2 |
125673 2.7.04 |
Lot 30 (94) Kemp Street, Pearsall Mainlake Holdings Pty Ltd & Omega Management Services Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
9.7.04 |
3 |
125579 24.6.04 |
Lot 15 (80) Clarkson Ave, Tapping P Scarfo |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
6.7.04 |
4 |
125811 21.7.04 |
Lot 5 (29) Ashley Road, Tapping Delstrat Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
30.7.04 |
5 |
125675 2.7.04 |
Lot 1395 (121) Ranch Road, Mariginiup S F Neville |
Rural Resource/ Regional Reservation – Parks & Recreation SCU5 |
Supported |
27.7.04 |
6 |
125539 25.6.04 |
Lot 75 (21) Cooper Street, Madeley PH3 Land Madeley Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
28.7.04 |
7 |
125524 17.6.04 |
Lot 69 (32) Cooper Street, Madeley H Antulov |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
19.7.04 |
8 |
125644 15.7.04 |
Lot 32 (295) Kingsway, Darch Weston Living Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Not Supported 500m poultry buffer area |
21.7.04 |
9 |
125876 27.7.04 |
Lot 9 (34) Kingsway, Madeley A & T Vlahov |
Residential SCU1 |
Supported |
28.7.04 |
10 |
123536 29.10.03 (previously deferred) |
Lot 9 (3) Backshall Place, Wanneroo Gospel Baptist Church |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
23.7.04 |
11 |
123547 29.10.03 (previously deferred) |
Lot 9 (3) Backshall Place, Wanneroo Gospel Baptist Church |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
19.7.04 |
12 |
125480 14.6.04 |
Pt Lot 50 (10) Gnangara Road, Madeley Pinecreek Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
6.7.04 |
13 |
125807 19.7.04 |
Lot 14 (272) Kingsway, Darch Realstar Investments Pty Ltd |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
21.7.04 |
14 |
125603 28.6.04 |
Pt Lot 15 (69) Pinjar Road, Ashby Watson Property Group Ashby Rise Ltd |
Urban Dev Regional Reservation/Other Regional Road SCU1 |
Supported |
2.7.04 |
15 |
808-04 5.7.04 |
Lot 210 (27) Adelphi Court, Marangaroo M J Gangemi |
Residential SCU1 |
Supported |
21.7.04 |
16 |
868-04 15.7.04 |
Lot 313 (3) Cleveland Court, Marangaroo S & B Di-Benedetto |
Residential SCU1 |
Supported |
30.7.04 |
17 |
125456 1.7.04 |
Lot 1260 (50) St Stephens Crescent, Tapping St Stephens School |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
20.7.04 |
18 |
125646 28.6.04 |
Lot 9000 (131) Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove Homeswest Vacant |
Spec Residential 02 / Urban Dev / Regional Reservation Other Regional Road SCU1 |
Supported |
20.7.04 |
19 |
125379 4.6.04 |
Lot 264 (95) Excellence Drive, Wangara Lenori Pty Ltd |
General Industrial SCU1 |
Supported |
6.7.04 |
20 |
897-04 20.7.04 |
Lot 92 (25) Brooklyn Ave, Pearsall P L Calleja |
Urban Dev SCU1 |
Supported |
21.7.04 |
21 |
845-04 12.7.04 |
Lot 249 (37) Old Trafford Ave, Madeley G & M Napoli |
Residential SCU1 |
Supported |
19.7.04
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S25/0060V01
File Name: GAReallocation of funds from the Suncity Business Technology Association to the Wanneroo Business Association.doc This
Level 4 Approval by ch Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by ch Date 17 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Manager Economic Development
Meeting Date: August 31, 2004
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a request from the Wanneroo Business Association (WBA) for a $2500 contribution to the Sun City Business and Technology Association (SCBTA).
Background
The City of Wanneroo has provided contributions to the SCBTA and the WBA for the past few years in an effort to acknowledge and partially support the activities of these organisations.
The Economic Development charter of the City of Wanneroo is to work closely with groups able to make a contribution to small business retention and expansion in order to create local jobs.
Detail
An amount of $2500 was allocated in the 2003/2004 City of Wanneroo budget as a contribution toward running and project costs for the SCBTA.
Before the end of the 2003/2004 financial year, that not-for-profit incorporated association decided to wind up. The Executive Secretary of the WBA chaired a meeting at the Suncity Access Centre in April 2004 with SCBTA committee members and interested members of the general public to determine the way forward for the SCBTA.
The WBA is now seeking payment of the $2500 to recover the extra costs associated with providing its sub-branch facilities to the Yanchep/Two Rocks region, in lieu of the City’s payment of this amount to the SCBTA.
Consultation
A meeting was held with the board of the WBA in July 2004, with discussions focussed on greater outreach small business assistance in the Yanchep/Two Rocks region. During that same time period, the Wanneroo Business Association was forming a sub-branch in Yanchep/Two Rocks.
Comment
Small business assistance in Yanchep/Two Rocks is likely to be enhanced due to the establishment of the WBA sub-branch in that region. Due to growth in the numbers of small businesses in the Yanchep/Two Rocks region, the small business facilitation services are vital to the growth of that sector. The extra funds will ensure the continuation of these services.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
With the consolidation of the WBA as the peak body representing small business interests within the City of Wanneroo, it is vital that the City support the expansion of this valuable organisation.
This is consistent with Strategy 3.2 within the City’s Strategic Plan which aims to identify, support and respond to the needs of existing and new industries.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The funds are available from donations (4402) and have been carried forward from the 2003/2004 budget for this purpose.
It is likely that the Wanneroo Business Association will be seeking future donations from the City of Wanneroo being commensurate with the level of service they are seeking to offer across the whole of the City. It is acknowledged that this requires extra funding as costs increase covering a wider geographical area.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council AGREE to the payment of $2500 originally allocated to the Sun City Business and Technology Association to the Wanneroo Business Association.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: C04387V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
File Name: AATender Number 04387 The Suply and Delivery of Crushed Limestone.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 11 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 11 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04387 - The Supply and Delivery Crushed Limestone.
Background
The supply of materials, works and services for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of period contracts. Tender No 04387 - The Supply and Delivery of Crushed Limestone was advertised on 3 July 2004 and closed on 13 July 2004. Prices are required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Rates table shown on Attachment 1.
The contract period is 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005 and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending this contract for an additional period of one year or part thereof. Any extension will be in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the original contract.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
1 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2004 |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2005 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator Engineering Operations, Engineer – Operations and Contracts Officer has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria:
a) price for the services offered;
b) tenderer’s resources; and
c) safety management.
Tender submissions were received from:
· WA Limestone
· Roadstone
The tender document included items for the supply only and the supply and delivery of limestone.
Price for the services offered:
Limestone is delivered to projects by a combination of the City’s and supplier’s trucks. The total quantity of limestone received during 2003/2004 has been applied to the tendered schedule of rates to estimate the total annual costs of limestone to be supplied by the two tenderers. The estimated total annual cost of the WA Limestone submission ($123,000), is less than that of the Roadstone submission ($138,000). It is anticipated that the quantity of limestone during the contract period for Tender No 04387 will be similar and therefore, WA Limestone has scored higher than Roadstone in this regard.
Tenderer’s resources:
Both tenderers are assessed to have sufficient resources to provide the specified services and have scored equally under this criteria.
It is noted that WA Limestone has previously been the City’s contractor for the supply and delivery of crushed limestone.
Safety management:
WA Limestone has provided a copy of its safety management procedures and Roadstone has made a statement that this company does not have an Occupational Health Safety (OHS) management system in place but has provided a written undertaking that it will implement one if the contract is awarded to Roadstone. Based on the information provided by both tenderers, WA Limestone has scored higher than Roadstone in regard to this criteria.
The evaluation process determined that the tender from WA Limestone achieved the highest rating based on all the selection criteria.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is recommended that Tender No 04387 from WA Limestone be accepted in accordance with the tender evaluation results.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of crushed limestone for use on construction and maintenance projects is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this tender is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.
Based on similar quantities to those used in 2003/2004, the estimated cost of supply and delivery of crushed limestone for 2004/2005 is in the order of $125,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 |
|
ITEM |
DESCRIPTION |
Crushed limestone loaded into Principal vehicles at quarry: |
|
1 |
Mix no. 1 |
2 |
Mix no. 2 |
Crushed limestone to nominated sites by six/eight wheeler rear tipping trucks: |
|
3 |
Mix no. 1 |
4 |
Mix no. 2 |
Crushed limestone to nominated sites by semi trailer rear tipping trucks: |
|
5 |
Mix no. 1 |
6 |
Mix no. 2 |
Crushed limestone to nominated sites by six/eight wheeler side tipping trucks: |
|
7 |
Mix no. 1 |
8 |
Mix no. 2 |
Crushed limestone to nominated sites by semi trailer side rear tipping trucks: |
|
9 |
Mix no. 1 |
10 |
Mix no. 2 |
Mix No 1 – 75mm
Mix No 2 – 19mm
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C04394V01
File Name: AATender Number 04394 The Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Stabilised Limestone.doc This line will not be printed dont
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by JAN Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04394 - The Supply and Delivery Bitumen Stabilised Limestone.
Background
The supply of materials, works and services for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of period contracts. Tender No 04394 - The Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Stabilised Limestone was advertised on 17 July 2004 and closed on 3 August 2004. Prices are required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Rates table shown on Attachment 1.
The contract period is from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005, and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending this contract for an additional period of one year or part thereof. Any such extension will be in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the original contract.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Lump Sum and Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
1 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2004 |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2005 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator Engineering Operations, Engineer – Operations and Contracts Officer evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection:
d) price for the services offered;
e) tenderer’s resources; and
f) safety management.
Only one tender submission from WA Limestone has been received.
The tender document included items for the supply only and the supply and delivery of bitumen stabilised limestone.
Price for the services offered:
Bitumen stabilised limestone is delivered to projects by a combination of the City’s and supplier’s trucks. Being the only tender received, no external comparison is possible. However, a comparison has been made to determine the price difference between the new rates and the existing rates.
WA Limestone has also proposed in its tender that the prices are subject to rise and fall and will be dependent on bitumen prices. Adjustment in prices will be applicable two months after the change in bitumen price. WA Limestone has provided a descriptive calculation method in its tender which has been clarified as a firm calculation method.
It is generally known that bitumen prices are driven by international price changes in petroleum products. The price of bitumen has changed once during the past 12 months. Though the City invited fixed price tenders, WA Limestone’s tender submission is considered fair as the rise and fall clause is purely driven by change in bitumen prices.
During 2003/2004, bitumen stabilised limestone was purchased from WA Limestone as per 2003/2004 contact rates for items 1, 5 and 9. Based on quantities purchased in 2003/2004 the total 2003/2004 cost of bitumen stabilised limestone was $379,225. The cost to purchase similar quantities as per proposed new tender rates will be $407,178, an increase of 7.37%.
As per rise and fall formula proposed by WA Limestone, a variation in bitumen price of $30 per tonne will result in a variation of $0.67 per tonne in price of bitumen stabilised limestone.
Tenderer’s resources:
WA Limestone is assessed to have sufficient resources to provide the specified services.
Safety management:
WA Limestone has provided a copy of its safety management procedures.
The evaluation process determined that the tender from WA Limestone has submitted a conforming tender. WA Limestone is the City’s current Suppler of Bitumen Stabilised Limestone.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is recommended that Tender No 04387 from WA Limestone be accepted in accordance with the tender evaluation undertaken as per the selection criteria included in the tender document. The price for bitumen stabilised limestone is dependent upon the price of bitumen. In view of the 6.25% increase in bitumen price over the last 12 months the new prices submitted by WA Limestone are considered competitive in comparison to the existing prices.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of bitumen stabilised limestone for use on construction and maintenance projects is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this tender is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the four year Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.
Based on similar quantities to those used in 2003/2004, the estimated cost for the supply and delivery of bitumen stabilised limestone for 2004/2005 is in the order of $407,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 04394 from WA Limestone for the Supply and Delivery of Bitumen Stabilised Limestone for a period of one year as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering, inclusive of rise and fall applicable to changes in bitumen prices.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 |
||
ITEM |
MIX |
DESCRIPTION |
THE SUPPLY ONLY OF PRE-MIXED BITUMEN STABILISED LIMESTONE LOADED INTO PRINCIPAL’S VEHICLES AT THE QUARRY |
||
1 |
1 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
2 |
1A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
3 |
2 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
4 |
2A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
THE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF PRE-MIXED BITUMEN STABILISED LIMESTONE TO NOMINATED SITES BY SIX/EIGHT WHEELER REAR TIPPING TRUCKS |
||
5 |
1 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
6 |
1A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
7 |
2 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
8 |
2A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
THE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF PRE-MIXED BITUMEN STABILISED LIMESTONE TO NOMINATED SITES BY SEMI TRAILER REAR TIPPING TRUCKS |
||
9 |
1 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
10 |
1A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
11 |
2 |
2% bitumen stabilised limestone |
12 |
2A |
2.5% bitumen stabilised limestone |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C04388V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
File Name: AATender Number The Supply and Delivery of Clay Brick Pavers.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04388 - The Supply and Delivery of Clay Brick Pavers.
Background
The supply of materials, works and services for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of period contracts. Tender No 04388 - The Supply and Delivery of Clay Brick Pavers was advertised on 3 July 2004 and closed on 13 July 2004. Prices are required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Rates table shown on Attachment 1.
The contract period is from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005, and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending this contract for an additional period of one year or part thereof. Any such extension will be in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the original contract.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
1 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2004 |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2005 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator Engineering Operations, the Engineer – Operations and the Contracts Officer have evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection:
1. price for the services offered;
2. tenderer’s resources; and
3. safety management.
Tender submissions were received from:
· Bristile Operations Ltd
· Midland Brick Company
The tender document included items for clay brick pavers of different sizes. The City’s requirement for clay pavers is dependent on the nature of projects and the type/make and colour of pavers used on existing infrastructure. In the past the City has purchased clay pavers from both Bristile (previously known as Metro) and Midland.
Both tenderers are assessed to have sufficient resources and safety management processes in place to meet the City’s requirements. Prices offered by both tenderers are competitive prices and there is only a marginal increase from the current prices.
Both tenderers have previously supplied clay brick pavers to the City.
Midland Brick Company and Bristile Operations Ltd are the recommended Tender No 04388 suppliers. The recommendation for two clay brick suppliers is based on flexibility to ensure supply, colour, shape and size needs are met for projects and to enable matching of pavers used on existing infrastructure. Midland Brick Company has provided the lower prices for the supply and delivery of clay brick pavers and will therefore be given the first opportunity to provide new clay brick pavers for projects.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Recommendations have been based on the tender evaluation undertaken as per the selection criteria included in the tender document and the recommended tenderers have previously been the City’s contractors for the tendered items.
It is appropriate to accept both tenders to provide flexibility in selection of colour/type of pavers to suit the nature of projects.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of clay brick pavers for use on construction and maintenance projects is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this tender is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for the maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.
Based on similar quantities to those used in 2003/2004, the estimated cost for the supply and delivery of clay brick pavers for 2004/2005 is in the order of $45,000
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 04388 from Midland Brick Company and Bristle Operations Ltd for the Supply and Delivery of Clay Brick Pavers for a period of one year as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 |
||
ITEM |
DESCRIPTION |
|
Heavy Duty Clay Paving Bricks (Red and Terracotta) |
||
1 |
Please specify dimension |
|
2 |
Delivered to nominated Sites within the City of Wanneroo |
|
3 |
Loaded on to Principal vehicles at the Contractor’s outlet |
|
High Performance Clay Paving Bricks (Red and Terracotta) |
||
4 |
Please specify dimension: |
|
5 |
Delivered to nominated Sites within the City of Wanneroo |
|
6 |
Loaded on to Principal vehicles at the Contractor’s outlet |
|
MISCELLANEOUS |
||
7 |
Additional cost for packs to be strapped in steel straps. |
|
8 |
Minimum order |
|
9 |
Additional cost for orders less than the minimal specified above |
|
TRAFFIC CONTROL |
||
10 |
2 accredited controllers |
|
11 |
3 accredited controllers |
|
12 |
4 accredited controllers |
|
13 |
Minimum charge for 2 accredited controllers |
|
14 |
Minimum charge for 3 accredited controllers |
|
15 |
Minimum charge for 4 accredited controllers |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C04389V01
File Name: AATender Number 04389 The Supply and Delivery of Concrete Segmnental Brick Pavers.doc This line will not be printed dont
Level 5 Approval by jan Date 25 August 2004
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by JAN Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004 delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04389 - The Supply and Delivery of Concrete Segmental Brick Pavers.
Background
The supply of materials, works and services for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of period contracts. Tender No 04389 - The Supply and Delivery of Concrete Segmental Brick Pavers was advertised on 3 July 2004 and closed on 13 July 2004. Prices are required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Rates table shown on Attachment 1.
The contract period is 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005 and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending this contract for an additional period of one year or part thereof. Any extension will be in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the original contract.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
1 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2004 |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2005 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator Engineering Operations, Engineer – Operations and Contracts Officer has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria:
1. price for the services offered;
2. tenderer’s resources; and
3. safety management.
Tender submissions were received from:
· Midland Brick Company
The tender document included items for concrete brick pavers of different sizes. The City’s requirement for the concrete pavers is dependent on the nature of projects and existing type/make and colour of pavers used on existing infrastructure. In the past the City has purchased concrete segmental pavers from Blokpave, Midland Brick Company and Atlas Group Pty Ltd, although on this occasion Atlas Group Pty Ltd has not submitted a tender bid.
Both tenderers are assessed to have sufficient resources and safety management processes in place to meet the City’s requirements. Prices offered by both tenderers are competitive prices and there is a marginal increase from the current prices.
Both tenderers have previously supplied concrete pavers to the City.
Blokpave and Midland Brick are the recommended Tender No 04389 suppliers. The recommendation for two concrete segmental paver suppliers is based on the flexibility to ensure supply, colour, shape and size needs are met for projects and to enable matching of concrete pavers used on existing infrastructure. BGC Blokpave has provided the lower prices for the supply and delivery of concrete segmental pavers and will therefore be given the first opportunity to provide new concrete segmental pavers for projects.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Recommendations have been based on the tender evaluation undertaken as per the selection criteria included in the tender document and the recommended tenderers have previously been the City’s contractors for the tendered items.
It is appropriate to accept both tenders to provide flexibility in selection of colour/type of pavers to suit the nature of projects.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of concrete segmental pavers for use on construction and maintenance projects is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this tender is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the four year Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for the maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.
Based on similar quantities to those used in 2003/2004, the estimated cost for the supply and delivery of concrete segmental brick pavers for 2004/2005 is in the order of $140,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 04389 from Blokpave and Midland Brick Company for the Supply and Delivery of Concrete Segmental Brick Pavers for a period of one year as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
|
ATTACHMENT 1 |
ITEM |
DESCRIPTION |
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BRICK PAVERS – APPROXIMATELY 60MM THICK |
|
1 |
specify dimension: |
2 |
Delivered to nominated Sites within the City of Wanneroo |
3 |
Loaded on to Principal vehicles at the Contractor’s outlet |
4 |
Pack size coverage area (without gaps in between) per standard pack |
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BRICK PAVERS – APPROXIMATELY 80MM THICK |
|
5 |
specify dimension: |
6 |
Delivered to nominated Sites within the City of Wanneroo |
7 |
Loaded on to Principal vehicles at the Contractor’s outlet |
8 |
Pack size coverage area (without gaps in between) per standard pack |
MISCELLANEOUS |
|
9 |
Additional cost for packs to be strapped in steel straps. |
10 |
Minimum order |
11 |
Additional cost for orders less than the minimal specified above |
TRAFFIC CONTROL |
|
12 |
2 accredited controllers |
13 |
3 accredited controllers |
14 |
4 accredited controllers |
15 |
Minimum charge for 2 accredited controllers |
16 |
Minimum charge for 3 accredited controllers |
17 |
Minimum charge for 4 accredited controllers |
OTHER PAVER TYPES WHERE AVAILABLE (TENDERER TO SPECIFY) |
|
18 |
specify paver: |
19 |
specify dimension: |
20 |
Delivered to nominated Sites within the City of Wanneroo |
21 |
Loaded on to Principal vehicles at the Contractor’s outlet |
22 |
Pack size coverage area (without gaps in between) per standard pack |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C04386V01
File Name: AATender Numebr 04386 The Provision of Material Testing Services.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04386 – The Supply and Delivery of Material Testing Services.
Background
The supply of materials, works and services for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past by the issue of period contracts. Tender No 04386 - The Provision of Material Testing Services was advertised on 3 July 2004 and closed on 13 July 2005. Prices are required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Rates table shown on Attachment 1.
The contract period is 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2007 and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending the contract for an additional period of one year or part thereof. Any extension will be in accordance with the same terms and conditions of the original contract.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
3 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2004 |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2007 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Coordinator Engineering Operations, Engineer – Operations and Contracts Officer evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria:
1. price for the services offered;
2. tenderer’s resources;
3. safety management; and
4. tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out work similar to the services required
Tender submissions were received from:
· Qualcon Laboratories Pty Ltd
· Coffee Geosciences Pty Ltd
· AMEC Engineering Pty Ltd
The tender document included a range of tests required for materials such as sand, limestone, bitumen stabilised limestone, asphalt and pavement testing.
Price for the services offered:
Qualcon Laboratories has submitted lower prices for most of the items and offer the overall lowest cost tender in comparison to the other two tenders.
Tenderer’s resources:
All three tenderers are assessed to have sufficient resources to provide the tendered services.
Safety management:
All three tenderers have sufficient safety management policies in place. In addition, all three tenderers are registered with the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) and NATA audits include some safety management procedures.
Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out work similar to the Services required:
All tenderers have experience in the provision of similar services.
It is noted that Qualcon Laboratories has previously been the City’s contractor for the provision of material testing services.
The evaluation process determined that the tender from Qualcon Laboratories achieved the highest rating based on the all the selection criteria.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is recommended that Tender No 04386 from Qualcon Laboratories be accepted in accordance with the tender evaluation results.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of material testing services for use on construction and maintenance projects is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this tender is dependent on the type of capital works projects approved in the Capital Works Programme. The cost of the works is directly charged to the projects. Expenditure for maintenance works is charged to the Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations.
Based on similar quantities to those used in 2003/2004, the estimated cost of material testing is in the order of $8,500.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 04386 from Qualcon Laboratories Pty Ltd for the Provision of Material Testing Services for a period of three years as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 2 |
|
ITEM |
DESCRIPTION |
CLASSIFICATION / AGGREGATE TESTING |
|
1 |
Classification testing |
2 |
Particle size distribution (MRWA 210.1) |
3 |
Particle size distribution (MRWA 115.5) |
4 |
Particle size distribution (MRWA 105.1) |
5 |
Moisture content |
6 |
Linear shrinkage |
7 |
Calcium carbonate content |
8 |
Layer thickness |
9 |
Average least dimension |
10 |
Flakiness index |
11 |
Colour of aggregate |
12 |
Bulk density & water absorption of fine aggregate. |
13 |
Bulk density & water absorption of coarse aggregate |
14 |
Particle shape |
15 |
Unit mass |
16 |
Wet/dry strength variation |
17 |
Unsound particles |
COMPACTION CONTROL |
|
18 |
Sampling for maximum dry density |
19 |
Sampling for moisture content dry back |
20 |
Dry density: moisture content relationship |
21 |
Dry density: moisture content nuclear method |
22 |
Moisture content |
23 |
Dry density ratio (%) – calculation |
24 |
Moisture ratio (%) |
25 |
Dry density: sand replacement method |
26 |
Sand penetrometer tests |
STRENGTH TESTING |
|
27 |
Sub grade insitu CBR testing |
28 |
Compressive strength and CBR testing |
29 |
Maximum dry compressive strength |
30 |
CBR testing |
31 |
Soaked CBR testing |
STABILISED LIMESTONE |
|
32 |
Dispersion of bitumen in soil testing |
33 |
Bitumen content and PSD of stabilised soil |
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 |
|
34 |
Dispersion of bitumen |
35 |
Bitumen content & PSD of stabilised soil |
ASPHALT TESTING |
|
36 |
Core sampling |
37 |
Bitumen content and grading |
38 |
Bitumen stability and flow testing |
39 |
Asphalt maximum density testing |
40 |
Asphalt bulk density and void content (Marshall) |
41 |
Asphalt Particle Coating Testing |
CONCRETE TESTING (KERBING ETC) |
|
42 |
Slump test |
43 |
Strength test |
CALL OUT CHARGES PER VISIT INCLUDING COLLECTION, ERECTION, MAINTENANCE AND RETENTION OF SIGNS IF REQUIRED |
|
44 |
Zone 1 (PER VISIT) |
45 |
Zone 2 (PER VISIT) |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: CO4391VO1
File Name: AATender No 04391 The Supply And Application Of Fertiliser On Specific Parks within the City Of lWanneroo For A
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 12 August 2004Period.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services.
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: David Green
Meeting Date: 31 August
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 04391 for the Supply and Application of Fertiliser on Specified Parks Within the City of Wanneroo.
Background
To achieve “Industry Best Practice” in fertiliser application, quality tests were undertaken with regards soil, leaf, pH and water on all of the irrigated parks within the City of Wanneroo. The results were collated and a comprehensive fertiliser programme was formulated which is specific to each site. Special consideration was given to turf sites where nutrient run off and leaching may occur. The supply and application of fertiliser in accordance with the programme and specifications was then advertised for public tender for a 12 month period.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below.
Contract Type |
Lump Sum and Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
1 Year |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2004 |
Expiry Date |
30 September 2005 |
Extension Permitted |
No |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
Tender No 04391 for the Supply and Application of Fertiliser to Specified Parks within the City of Wanneroo was advertised on 10 July 2004 and closed on 27 July 2004. Tender submissions were received from the following:
· Baileys Fertilisers,
· D & E Parker (Lawn Doctor),
· Lovegrove Turf Services
· Turfmaster Facility Management.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Senior Parks Operation Officer and Coordinator Parks Operations, has evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria:
1. Price
2. Tenderer’s Resources
3. Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out services similar to the service, including past record of achievement with similar contracts
4. Safety Management
Price
An overall ranking was determined by assessing prices contained within the schedules and estimated future programmed works. Prior to the closing date of the tender an addendum was sent out to all contractors who had received the tender document. The addendum included an additional schedule for bulk fertiliser.
The total calculated estimated costs for the term of the contract are shown in the following table:
Tenderer |
Total Estimated Prices |
|
|
Schedule 1A (Bags) |
Schedule 1B (Bulk) |
Baileys Fertilisers |
$95,336 |
$81,229 |
D & E Parker (Lawn Doctor) |
$76,105 |
$76,105 |
Lovegrove Turf Services |
$102,444 |
$87,724 |
Turfmaster Facility Management |
$90,953 |
$76,968 |
Resources
The four tenderers were ranked equally as they provided comprehensive tender submissions and demonstrated that they had the resources to fulfil the requirements of the contract.
Previous experience
The four tenderers provided comprehensive tender submissions and have demonstrated experience in providing services of a similar size and nature. Lawn Doctor is the City’s current contractor for broad leaf weed control and Turfmaster holds the contract for general weed control. Both companies have provided satisfactory services to the City of Wanneroo for over ten years.
This includes the number of personnel, direct labour, trade disciplines, qualifications/training and experience of key members of the company.
Safety Management
The four tenderers provided comprehensive safety management plans and were ranked equally in regards this criteria.
Tenderer Summary
During the weighted score analysis process, the four tenderer’s submissions were reviewed with the following observations:
· The key aspect of the tender evaluation is price.
· All four companies have worked for the City of Wanneroo previously and have provided acceptable levels of service
· All four companies addressed the selection criteria and were assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience in carrying out services similar to the service including past record of achievement with similar contracts and safety management to undertake the works
The overall scoring of the tenders based on a weighted score is shown below:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
D & E Parker (Lawn Doctor) |
1 |
Turfmaster Facility Management |
2 |
Baileys Fertilisers |
3 |
Lovegrove Turf Services |
4 |
Comment
The D & E Parker (Lawn Doctor) tender submission has been evaluated as the number one ranked tenderer in accordance with the assessment criteria and weighting as detailed in the tender document, and is therefore recommended as the successful tenderer. D & E Parker (Lawn Doctor) has provided a consistent standard of workmanship on the previous occasions this company has worked for the City, with all work conducted in a professional customer service oriented manner.
Statutory Compliance
Tenderers have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply and application of fertiliser on specified parks within the City of Wanneroo for a period of twelve months is congruent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies
“Environmental Sustainability
1.1 Conserve and enhance environmental assets
Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The costs associated with the Tender No 04391 can be accommodated through the approved budget allocation for Parks Maintenance Operations.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 04391 from D & E Parker Pty Ltd (Lawn Doctor) for the Supply and Application of Fertiliser on Specified Parks within The City Of Wanneroo for a Period of One Year (October 2004 to September 2005).
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: CO4384V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Coordinator Parks Operations
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
File Name: AAThe Preparation and Maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 05 July 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 05 July 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 05 July 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider options relating to the ongoing maintenance of the turf cricket wickets at the Kingsway Regional Sports Complex, including the option to accept Tender No 04384 The Preparation and Maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets.
Background
The Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club (the Club) is affiliated with the Western Australian Cricket Association (WACA) and can be regarded as the City of Wanneroo’s premier cricket club. The Club is based at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex and competes in First Class WACA fixtures on turf wickets. The Club has four senior sides, colts and junior competitions and as such requires two central turf wickets and turf training wickets.
Since September 1996 (Item TS 255-09/96 refers) the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club has maintained the two central turf wickets and the turf training wickets. This initial agreement involved the City of Wanneroo providing a contribution of $50,000 per annum to the club.
In March 1997, the agreement was reviewed (Item TS104-03/97 refers). As a consequence of this review, Council resolved to:
MOVED Cr Wight, SECONDED Cr Healy that Council authorises negotiations with the Wanneroo Cricket Club to achieve a reduction in the current subsidy as follows:
1. the current subsidy being paid to clubs should be gradually reduced by $1,000 per annum until the subsidy reaches a figure of $20,000 per annum, per wicket square. This reduction is to be proportional to the number of wicket squares per club;
2. clubs will no longer be required to pay the seasonal turf wicket hire rate. The season rate for Outdoor Team Sports - Grassed Areas, currently $206 per team per season, will be implemented from the 1997/1998 summer season, resulting in substantial savings to the clubs;
3. clubs will be granted the opportunity to become booking officers for each summer season. Any bookings undertaken by the clubs must be done in accordance with Council’s policies and without discrimination against any group.
CARRIED
Based on the above recommendation, the current lump sum paid to the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club is $40,000 per annum plus the supply and maintenance of the plant and equipment by the City of Wanneroo for the use of the club to maintain the wicket. This equipment includes:
· 24” reel cylinder mower
· Scarifier (Vertimower)
· Sweeper
· Vacuum
· Mentay roller
· 36” reel cylinder mower
· Hand Roller
· 6 x 4 trailer.
The current value of this equipment (including annual maintenance) is $5,268pa, with a replacement cost of $35,084. In addition to this, the annual turf wicket hire fee of $1,820pa annum (a total of $3,640) has been waived, however the Club still pays the seasonal ground hire fee of $260 per team per season. This amounted to $1,016 in 2003/2004.
The total contribution made by the City of Wanneroo to the Club for the upkeep of the turf wickets can be summarised as follows:
ITEM |
AMOUNT |
Turf wicket maintenance contribution |
$40,000 |
Equipment provision |
$5,268 |
Waiver of turf wicket hire fees |
$3,640 |
Total |
$48,908 |
Since 1997 this arrangement has worked extremely well for both the City of Wanneroo and the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club. The primary benefits of the arrangement include:
· The Club has the flexibility with staff or contractors to work out of hours and or longer hours during peak work loads compared to that of the City of Wanneroo.
· The Club may wish to provide additional funds to raise the maintenance standard above the normal expected level.
· The Club is responsible for the standard of the wicket and not the City of Wanneroo.
· Lower administration costs overall
Notwithstanding that the current process worked well and benefited both the club and the City of Wanneroo, the need to test the current arrangement against the market was considered to be prudent. As a result, Administration sought public tenders for the maintenance of the two central turf wickets and the turf practice wickets.
Detail
Tender No 04384 for The Preparation and Maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets was advertised for public tender on Saturday 5 June 2004 and closed on Tuesday 22 June 2004.
Two tenders were received from tenderers as listed below:
· Vince Clarke’s Garden and Parks
· D & E Parker T/as Lawn Doctor
Primary details of the new contract are shown in the following tables.
Table 1 – Contract Information
Contract Type |
Fixed Lump Sum |
Commencement Date (works) |
1 August 2004 |
Expiry Date (works) |
31 July 2007 |
Contract Period |
36 Months |
Extension Permitted |
Yes |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator Parks Operations and the Contracts Officer has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following assessment criteria:
Table 2 – Tender Assessment Criteria
ITEM No. |
DESCRIPTION |
|
1. |
Price for the Services offered |
60% |
2. |
Tenderer’s previous experience |
15% |
3. |
Resources |
15% |
4. |
Safety Management |
10% |
The key aspect of the tender evaluation is price, which was allocated 60% of the total assessment criteria. The prices tendered were lump sum price bids for each year of the 3 year contract, and the service level requirements are as per the specification. A summary of the lump sum tender prices is shown in Table 3.
Table 3 – Price Assessment
|
Vince Clarke’s Garden and Parks |
D & E Parker T/as Lawn Doctor |
||||||
Year |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Total |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Total |
Tender Price |
$50,000 |
$52,500 |
$55,000 |
$157,500 |
$57,500 |
$57,500 |
$57,500 |
$172,500 |
The table clearly shows that Vince Clarke’s Garden and Parks has tendered the lowest price but were considerably higher than the current agreement with the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club of $40,000 per annum. It should be noted that the supply and maintenance of the Mentay roller and hand roller formed part of the tender. The remaining items of equipment were deleted from the tender specification, with the successful contractor required to provide the appropriate equipment.
Assessment of the bids against the remaining three selection criteria determined that the two contractors have adequate previous experience, resources and safety management to undertake the works although they were ranked differently for each criteria. Key factors that contributed to ranking differences are summarised as follows:
Experience
Vince Clark’s Garden and Parks has five years additional experience in turf wicket maintenance than D & E Parker.
Resources
Lawn Doctor has more resources to undertake the works.
Safety Management
Lawn Doctor has a more comprehensive Safety Management Plan.
The final ranking is summarised below in Table 4:
Table 4 - Tender Ranking
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Vince Clark’s Garden and Parks |
1 |
Lawn Doctor |
2 |
The Club was then involved in several discussions with Administration relating to the continuation of the current arrangement, but under a new Memorandum of Understanding. The first of these discussions outlined the preference of Administration to continue the current agreement and to outline a framework in which the Club may put forward a reviewed proposal, recognising that the general cost of maintaining the wickets has risen since the 1997 agreement was entered into. The final discussion with the Club sought to come to an agreement on the final arrangement with the Club, so that Council may consider it.
As a result of these discussions, the following proposal was put forward and agreed to by the Club:
1. That the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club be responsible for the management, maintenance and preparation (to the required standard) of the turf centre wickets and practice wickets at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex.
2. That the City of Wanneroo contribution to the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club be set at $49,000 per annum paid in two instalments of $24,500 each in September and February respectively and is subject to a CPI adjustment annually.
3. That the duration of the agreement be five years.
4. That the City of Wanneroo will provide and maintain the following equipment as outlined in the tender documentation:
· Mentay roller
· hand roller
5. That the Wanneroo District Cricket Club pay an annual fee of $1,820 per wicket subject to annual increase in accordance with the annually adopted Fees and Charges Schedule, ie., an increase equivalent to the annual rate increase.
Consultation
Consultation with the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club has occurred on a number of occasions through out the process including three meetings. In the first instance, the Club was involved in the development of the scope of works and review of the tender documentation. The second and third occasions included direct discussions with the Club regarding the nature of the agreement for the Club to continue to maintain the turf wickets.
Comment
It is the position of Administration that the current practice whereby the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club is provided with a contribution to maintain the two central turf wickets and turf practice wickets at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex should be continued. As outlined previously, the advantages of continuing this practice include:
· The Club has the flexibility with staff or contractors to work out of hours and or longer hours during peak work loads compared to that of the City of Wanneroo.
· The Club may wish to provide additional funds to raise the maintenance standard above the normal expected level.
· The Club is responsible for the standard of the wicket and not the City of Wanneroo.
· Lower administration costs overall
With respect to the Tender process, this has shown that the proposed agreement with the club is in line with the current market rate and therefore a fair and equitable arrangement.
On this basis it will be recommended that Council enter into a new five year agreement with the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club. The key points of the proposed agreement include:
1. That the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club be responsible for the management, maintenance and preparation (to the required standard) of the turf centre wickets and practice wickets at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex.
2. That the City of Wanneroo contribution to the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club be set at $49,000 per annum paid in two instalments of $24,500 each in September and February respectively and is subject to a CPI adjustment annually.
3. That the duration of the agreement be five years.
4. That the City of Wanneroo will provide and maintain the following equipment as outlined in the tender documentation:
· Mentay roller
· hand roller
5. That the Wanneroo District Cricket Club pay an annual fee of $1,820 per wicket subject to annual increase in accordance with the annually adopted Fees and Charges Schedule, ie., an increase equivalent to the annual rate increase.
In order to put into effect the turf wicket hire fee it will be recommended that an amendment be made to the Fees and Charges Schedule by reinstating the charge deleted in 2004/2005 in view of the previous arrangement to waive fees that had been approved by Council in 1997.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirement of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Amendments to the Fees and Charges Schedule will need to be advertised in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
The preparation and maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies as follows:
Item 2.6 of the Strategic Plan:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 To provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The funds to provide this service in 2004/2005 have been budgeted within the Parks Operations Maintenance Budget. The total cost to the City of Wanneroo is a $49,000 contribution to the Club and the depreciation/maintenance costs associated with the Mentay roller and hard roller.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DECLINES TO ACCEPT any tenders for Tender No 04384 - the Preparation and Maintenance of Kingsway Turf Cricket Wickets.
2. ENDORSES the principle that the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club is responsible for the management, maintenance and preparation (to the required standard) of the turf centre wickets and practice wickets at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex, subject to the City:
a) contributing to the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club $49,000 per annum paid in two instalments of $24,500 each in September and February respectively and is subject to a CPI adjustment annually
b) supplying and maintaining the following equipment, for the use of the Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club:
i. Mentay roller (Plant No 98065)
ii. hand roller (Plant No 98118)
3. AUTHORISES the CEO to prepare a Memorandum of Understanding, with the term of five years, between the City and Wanneroo District Cricket Club to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each party associated with the approval in 2. above.
4. AMENDS the Fees and Charges Schedule by the inclusion of the following item under the heading Parks, Gardens and Reserves:
Turf Wickets Per Season Per Wicket $1,820
and that the amendment be advertised in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act 1995.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: C04393V01, PR17/0001V01
File Name: EATender No 04393 Fllod Lighting to Warradale Park Landsdale.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 5 Approval by jan Date 25 August 2004
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by JAN Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Janek Sobon
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider Tender No. 04393 for the Construction of Floodlighting Works at Warradale Park, Landsdale.
Background
Council, at its meeting on 6 April 2004, considered Report Item TS09-04/04 regarding the installation of light towers and associated funding at Warradale Park, Landsdale and Edgar Griffiths Park, Wanneroo and resolved as follows: -
“1. NOTES that there is a shortfall in funding for the construction of two light towers at Warradale Park, Landsdale and two light towers at Edgar Griffiths Park, Wanneroo.
2. DEFERS consideration of the installation of floodlighting at Edgar Griffiths Park, Wanneroo until such time as the Master Plan for this park is presented to Council.
3. AUTHORISES the Director Technical Services to proceed with the preparation of documentation for public tenders for the construction of two lighting towers at Warradale Park, Landsdale where the acceptance of a tender outcome will be subject to a Council budget variation approval so that the proposed works can be undertaken”.
The proposed final layout of light towers at Warradale Park will incorporate a four light towers system to provide for the ultimate lighting standard in accordance with requirements of Australian Standards. The initial installation of two light towers as proposed in Tender No 04393 will also provide the conduit work for the future light towers and cater for recreational and club level use on the lit portion of the oval. It will not comply with the Australian Standards until after the installation of the second pair of light towers. Attachment 1 shows the location of the two light towers to be installed as part of this tender and the future light towers to be installed when the oval size is increased.
While there is no regulatory requirement to meet the lighting standards recommended in the Australian Standards, it is proposed to upgrade the Warradale Park lighting to a four pole configuration when this facility is developed to a senior oval standard.
It is noted that it has been standard practice over past years for the City to provide a two pole floodlighting arrangement for training purposes. The lighting provided in these instances also does not comply with current Australian Standards and is of a much lower standard than that proposed in the Stage 1 works at Warradale Park.
A Development Application was lodged for this work and because of the significant height of the towers (30m), and the number of lights on each tower (5), the proposal was advertised for 21 days, until 11 March 2004, to determine any public comment/objection to the scheme. The Senior Planning Officer processing the Development Approval for the proposed Warradale Park floodlighting did receive several telephone enquiries but no written submissions.
The detailed floodlighting design for Warradale Park was undertaken by BCA Consultants Pty Ltd and complies with Australian Standards AS 4282 and AS 2560.2.3 for oval lighting and associated light dispersion to adjoining areas. The floodlighting design is based on the worst-case scenario for full competition lighting using five 2000w metal halide Philips ‘Opti Vision’ luminaries mounted on a 30m pole during curfew hours (11pm to 6am) as deemed by AS 4282.
The following table summarises the calculated results for obtrusive light emanating from the light towers against the requirements AS 4282:
Item |
AS 4282 Requirements |
Worst-case Calculation Result |
Maximum illuminance in vertical plane during curfew hours for residential areas with a dark surround. |
1.0 Lux |
0.21 Lux |
Maximum luminous intensity emitted by the luminare during pre-curfew hours for large areas. |
7,500 cd |
3,208 cd |
Threshold increment for residential areas with a dark surround. |
20 % based on adaptation luminance of 0.1 cd/m2 |
2.0% |
As can be seen above, the current design proposal falls within the parameters recommended by AS 4282 for the control of obtrusive light.
Detail
Public tenders for the Construction of Floodlighting Works at Warradale Park closed at the City’s Offices at 3.00pm on Tuesday 3 August 2004 with the receipt of the following submissions:
Tenders Received |
Tendered Sums |
Electek Pty Ltd (Electek) |
$62,800.00 |
Wanneroo Electric Pty Ltd (Wanneroo Electric) |
$63,858.00 |
Nilsen Electric (WA) Pty Ltd (Nilsen Electric) |
$86,200.00 |
Prompt Electrical Services |
$93,133.46 |
Tender Assessment
The Tender Assessment Team comprising the Manager Infrastructure Services, Coordinator Infrastructure Projects and Building Project Officer has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria:
1. Price for the works offered.
2. Tenderer’s resources.
3. Tenderer’s previous experience in carrying out work similar to the works
4. Safety management (incorporated within tender submission).
Price
Electek indicated one exclusion within its tender submission by not providing an allowance for hard digging and clean fill to the extensive electrical conduit trenches. Electek’s exclusion of a rate for the excavation of hard rock and clean fill in its tender submission is not seen as a risk, as Warradale Park is a sand filled site having once been part of Snake Swamp.
There were no options to be considered in the construction of the works and the tender break down schedule provided was only used in the assessment of the tenders. Four conforming tenders were received and the ranking of tenders remained unchanged with Electek submitting the lowest conforming tender.
Resources
Regardless of the varying size of the four firms each tenderer was ranked equally as it was able to secure personnel and plant to execute the works.
Previous Experience
Three of the firms were ranked equal while Prompt Electrical Services had its ranking reduced as this firm appeared to only provide a project management services and was therefore reliant upon the external experience of subcontractors.
Safety Management
Wanneroo Electric and Electek were ranked as equal. Prompt Electrical Services and Nilsen Electrik had their ranking reduced as one was new to the principle of safety management and the other had incurred lost time to injury in 2001.
Overall Ranking Assessment
The overall scoring of the tenders based on a weighted score is shown below:
Electek |
1 |
Wanneroo Electric |
2 |
Nilsen Electric |
3 |
Prompt Electrical Services |
4 |
Comment
The Electek tender submission has been evaluated as the number one ranked tenderer in accordance with the assessment criteria and is therefore recommended for acceptance as the successful tenderer. Key characteristics of the recommended tenderer, Electek, are as follows:
· Registered Electrical contractor with Licence No EC005871 held by the firm’s proprietor.
· Experienced local electrical and communications contractor with 18 years experience.
· Successfully completed the four light tower installation at Ridgewood Park.
· The tender breakdown information is consistent with the prices presented in the other submissions.
The works programme for this project is outlined as follows:
Council Tender Award Approval |
31 August 2004 |
Award Contract |
10 September 2004 |
On Site Commencement |
13 September 2004 |
Practical Completion |
19 November 2004 |
The construction period of ten weeks is dependent on the manufacture of the light towers and supply of special light fittings, with installation carried out with minimal disturbance to the oval users.
Administration recommends that the tender sum of $62,800 submitted by Electek for the construction of floodlighting works at Warradale Park be accepted, subject to resolution of shortfall in funding as outlined in the Financial Implications section of this report.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
Development Approval was processed on 17 March 2004 for issue and the proposed works are to be actioned in compliance with the standard conditions applicable to the development. It is noted that although only two light towers to be installed in this proposed Contract, approval has been received to install four light towers around the oval with lighting to the grounds being restricted to between the hours of 5pm and 10pm.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The construction of floodlighting works at Warradale Park is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 To provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The following table identifies all costs associated with the project:
Floodlighting Works at Warradale Park, Landsdale - Tender No. 04393 |
||
Description |
Cost to Complete Works |
Funding |
Administration (tender advertising etc) |
$2,500 |
|
Project Management |
$3,000 |
|
Warradale Park Project Budget – Project No 824542 |
|
$37,800 |
Sports Ground Floodlighting – Project No 823457 |
|
$23,000 |
BCA Consultants Pty Ltd (Lighting Design) |
$2,570 |
|
Conforming Tender – Electek |
$62,800 |
|
Contingency |
$2,000 |
|
Total Project Budget |
|
$60,800 |
Total Project Cost |
$72,870 |
|
Shortfall in Project Funding |
|
$12,070 |
Council resolved at its meeting on 6 April 2004 to defer installation of lighting at Edgar Griffiths Park until the Master Plan for this park is presented to Council. Council also acknowledged at this meeting that there is a budget shortfall for the installation of two light towers at both Warradale Park and Edgar Griffths Park. It is recommended that the short fall of funding for Warradale Park be accommodated from a budget reallocation of funding from Project No 824543, Edgar Griffiths Park Floodlighting, as there is a need to finalise the Master Plan for this park and there are insufficient funds for the installation of two light towers. This shortfall will need to be addressed should a decision be made on proceeding with the floodlighting at Edgar Griffiths Park.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS Tender No 04393 for the Construction of Floodlighting Works at Warradale Park, Landsdale from Electek Pty Ltd for the tender sum of $62,800.
2. NOTES the following budget variation to accommodate the shortfall in funding for the installation of floodlighting works at Warradale Park, Landsdale.
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
824543 |
$12,070 |
|
Edgar Griffiths – Construction of Floodlighting |
824542 |
|
$12,070 |
Warradale Park – Construction of Floodlighting |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S16/0049V01
File Name: BAAuthority to Use Traffic Signs and Devices at Roadworks New Instrument of Authority.doc This line will not be printed
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by JAN Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Dennis Blair
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider execution of the Instrument of Authorisation to enable the City of Wanneroo to use traffic control signs and other devices at roadworks.
Background
The Commissioner of Main Roads has the authority to erect road signs, traffic control signals and other devices under Regulation 297 (1) of the Road Traffic Code 2000 (RTC). The Commissioner can delegate this authority to authorise bodies under regulation 297 (2) of the RTC, subject to any conditions specified in the Instrument of Authorisation. Unless it has been delegated to them, local governments do not have the authority to erect road signs, traffic control signals and other devices. This includes the use of traffic signs and devices at roadworks.
In 2001 Main Roads offered an Instrument of Authorisation to all local governments which, once executed, would enable them to use traffic signs and devises at roadworks without having to obtain further approvals from Main Roads, subject to a number of conditions. However a number of local governments, including the City of Wanneroo, have not yet executed this Instrument of Authorisation, potentially leaving them exposed to liability issues if they use road signs and traffic control devices at roadworks without prior approval from Main Roads.
Detail
The version of the Instrument of Authorisation sent to local governments in 2001 required compliance with Main Roads ‘Traffic Management Requirements for Works on Roads’ which was a guideline outlining Main Roads requirements for use of road signs and traffic control devices for works on roads in Western Australia. In consultation with the Institute of Public Works Engineering (WA Section), Main Roads has revised and retitled the above guideline to create the new ‘Traffic Management for Works on Roads – Code of Practice’. A copy of the revised Code of Practice has been placed in the Elected Members reading room for reference.
With the publication of the new Code of Practice, Main Roads is taking the opportunity to clarify the delegation to erect traffic signs and devices at roadworks by issuing a revised Instrument of Authorisation, refer Attachment 1. All local governments are requested to execute this new Instrument of Authorisation, which once fully executed, will replace any previous authorisation under the RTC.
The new Instrument of Authorisation refers to the ‘current’ version of the ‘Traffic Management for Roadworks – Code of Practice’ (the Code) and need not be revised every time the Code is revised.
Two copies of the Instrument of Authorisation need to be executed with the common seal of the Council stamped on the document, and witnessed in accordance with Council’s procedure for sealing documents.
Consultation
Main Roads WA consulted with representatives of local government, Institute of Public Works Engineering (WA Division) and WALGA in the development of the Code.
Comment
The installation and maintenance of traffic control signs and devised in the road reserve is critical for the safety of City operational staff, contractors and road users. The City has a duty of care to facilitate the safe and appropriate use of road signs and devices.
Without the Instrument of Authorisation, the City’s operational staff would need to submit a traffic management plan for approval by Main Roads WA for all works in the road reserve, no matter how minor the works. This process will cause delays on roadworks, increase the administrative work load of staff and have the potential to create hazardous situations for both road workers and users.
The execution of the Instrument of Authorisation is supported as it will enable the City to continue with the current traffic management practices and accept responsibility for providing safe work sites for staff, contractors and all road users.
Statutory Compliance
The Commissioner of Main Roads can delegate authority to erect road signs, traffic control signals and other devices under Regulation 297 (2) of the Road Traffic Code 2000, subject to conditions specified in the Instrument of Authorisation.
Traffic management signage at work sites requires general compliance with the Australian Standard 1742.3 – 2002 and the ‘Traffic Management for Works on Roads – Code of Practice, March 2004’.
Strategic Implications
The execution of the Instrument of Authorisation is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.3 Support and encourage the delivery of a safe and effective transport network
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There is no financial implication to the City as the proposed Instrument of Authorisation provides delegated authority for the City to continue with its current traffic management practices.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AGREES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, to enter into an Instrument of Authorisation with the Commissioner of Main Roads in accordance with Regulation 297 (2) of the Road Traffic Code 2000 to allow the City to use traffic signs and devices at roadworks without the need to obtain further approvals from Main Roads WA, subject to the conditions outlined in Attachment 1.
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to execute and affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Instrument of Authorisation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R11/0007V01
File Name: EAPedestrian Access Way Upgrade Colne Way Casserley Avenue Girrawheen.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 11 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 11 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Author: Steve Mackman
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the upgrade of pedestrian access ways between Bendix Way/Colne Way and Colne Way/Casserley Avenue in Girrawheen.
Background
An application was made by adjoining landowners to close four pedestrian access ways (PAW) in Girrawheen. The grounds stated in the application were continuing incidents of criminal and anti-social behaviour. At Council’s meeting of 27 September 2000 (Report W275-09/00 refers) it was resolved to support closure of Bendix Way-Girrawheen Avenue and Bendix Way – southern arm of Casserley Avenue. However, the Council did not support closure of the PAW’s between Bendix Way-Colne Way and Colne Way and the northern arm of Casserley Avenue. It was recommended that these two PAW’s be upgraded to make them safer for users and local residents.
Detail
Bendix Way to Colne Way – this PAW serves as a direct access route for many residents to Hainsworth Primary School and the bus stops on the northern arm of Casserley Avenue. The proposed upgrade will replace the existing bitumen footpath with a 2.5m wide concrete path, new kerb ramps will be provided at each end of the PAW and pedestrian grab rails replaced (as required). An 80W MV streetlight will be provided on a new 2.5m high pole located midway along the PAW. This light will be fitted with a shield to prevent light reflecting into the adjoining properties. Refer Attachment 1 for a pictorial representation of the proposed upgrade works).
The estimated cost of these works is $14,600.
Colne Way to northern arm of Casserley Avenue – this PAW serves as a direct access route for many residents to Hainsworth Primary School and the bus stops on the northern arm of Casserley Avenue. The proposed upgrade will replace the existing bitumen footpath with a 2.5m wide concrete path, a new kerb ramp will be provided at the southern end of the PAW. An 80W MV streetlight will be provided on a new 2.5m high pole located midway along the PAW. This light will be fitted with a shield to prevent light reflecting into the adjoining properties. Refer Attachment 2 for a pictorial representation of the proposed upgrade works.
The estimated cost of these works is $14,800.
Consultation
A letter and copy of the proposed upgrading works for the relevant PAW was mailed to each of the four property owners and/or occupiers adjoining the PAW’s seeking comments on the proposals. The responses received for each PAW are summarised below:
Bendix Way to Colne Way - No comment received.
Colne Way to northern arm of Casserley Avenue - one written response was received from the absentee landowner of 75 Casserley Avenue who was supportive of the upgrade but would have preferred the PAW to be closed. The respondent also asked if Council could consider additional measures to combat crime in the suburb.
Comment
It is anticipated that the proposed PAW upgrades will have an effect in reducing crime and anti-social behaviour in the immediate area of the PAW’s.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposed works are in accordance with the City’s Strategic Plan 2002-2005 goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.4 Support Safe and Secure Communities and
2.6 Provide and Manage Infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Construction estimates have been prepared for each of the proposed PAW upgrades. The following table identifies all associated costs with the works:
Location |
Estimate |
Bendix – Colne, Girrawheen |
$14,600 |
Colne – Casserley, Girrawheen |
$14,800 |
TOTAL |
$29,400 |
An amount of $30,000 was approved by Council in the 2004/2005 Capital Works Budget for the Public Access Way Upgrade Program.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the proposed upgrade of the pedestrian accessways between Bendix Way/Colne Way and Colne Way/Casserley Avenue, Girrawheen as shown on Attachments 1 and 2 and at an estimated cost of $29,400.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0004V1
File Name: GADisposal of Excavator Plant No 98880.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: David McKenna
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the disposal of surplus Plant No. 98880, Sumitomo SH200 Excavator by public auction.
Background
This excavator was purchased by the City in 1997 for use on drainage construction and maintenance works. A review by the Technical Services Directorate has determined that there is minimal requirement for this size of excavator as the number of drainage projects is reducing and specialist equipment can be readily supplied by contractors on an as need basis.
Detail
The Sumitomo SH 200 excavator used by Engineering Operations is seven years old and in reasonable condition. The excavator has only been used for a total of 2,200 hours, a very low usage for a machine of this value. Utilisation to date is only approximately 18% of its available time and based on information supplied by Engineering Operations it is anticipated that the machine will only be utilised for approximately 14% of its available time. The industry standard for this type of machine is in excess of 50% and with such low utilisation rates the hire cost of the machine will need to be reviewed. The current internal hire rate is $ 39.78 per hour or $75 per hour with operator.
Excavators of this size can be privately hired for around $ 90 to $ 100 per hour with operator and based on current utilisation, the revised rate would exceed this amount. Private hire also allows the opportunity to engage a machine suited for each particular job requirement eg. size, swamp/longreach, rubber tyred or tracked, with breaker and batter bucket.
Although the machine is being used infrequently, maintenance costs are still incurred when it is not in use, eg batteries go flat, ram rod chrome rusts, seals go dry and oils deteriorate. Due to the nature of the hydraulics on this machine, repairs are expensive.
Therefore based on current future needs, cost analysis of maintaining the excavator and depreciation, it has been determined that it will be more economic to source a privately hired machine when required.
The machine has recently been valued by an auction house at $ 75,000 and it is hoped that this figure will be exceeded.
Details of the excavator:
Sumitomo |
|
Model |
SH 200 |
Class |
ERG Class HX7 (20 Tonne) |
Purchase Date |
22 June 1997 |
Purchase Price |
$149,443 |
Operating Costs to date |
$21,676 |
Utilisation |
2,200 hours |
Comment
The excavator is still used when required with an anticipated 14% utilisation. Even with low utilisation the maintenance costs on this type of machine are likely to be high.
Excavators of this size can be easily hired and there is efficiency gains in using machines suited to particular component of projects.
Statutory Compliance
The disposal of the surplus excavator by pubic auction is in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
The disposal of the surplus excavator is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There is no impact on budgets for construction and maintenance projects. The sale proceeds will be returned to the Municipal Fund
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the disposal of Sumitomo Excavator Plant No. 98880 by public auction.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02/0010V01
File Name: GAMetropolitan North and East Recovery Group Partnering Agreement.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 13 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Phil Calley
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the City of Wanneroo becoming a signatory to the Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group Partnering Agreement (Partnering Agreement) for the Provision of Mutual Aid for Recovery During Emergencies.
Background
Part 5 of the State Recovery Emergency Management Plan issued by the Department of Premier and Cabinet defines Local Government’s recovery role in State emergency management arrangements and Policy Statement 4 (Emergency Management in the Perth Metropolitan Region) defines emergency management arrangements in a metropolitan context.
One of the key roles of Local Government that is required by State Government Policy is to manage the Recovery process after an emergency event. Essentially this involves two key aspects consisting of managing the restoration of infrastructure and services, and looking after the people that have been affected by a disaster (welfare). While Local Government has the overall responsibility for managing these functions it is assisted by various Government Agencies (e.g. the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Department for Community Development) and funding sources (e.g. Lord Mayor’s Appeal Fund, Commonwealth/State Natural Disaster Relief Arrangements). Financial arrangements are covered in the State Recovery Emergency Management Plan (Part 6).
In 2003 and 2004 the concept of developing a Regional Recovery Plan was discussed and subsequently a Northern Corridor Recovery Planning Group was formed. This group originally consisted of representatives from the Cities of Bayswater, Stirling, Joondalup and Wanneroo as well as FESA (SES), the Department for Community Development, the West Metropolitan Police Service and the Department of Health. The group was then re-named the Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group to reflect the addition of the City of Swan, Town of Bassendean, the Shire of Mundaring and the Shire of Kalamunda into the region.
The purpose of the Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group was to develop the concept of a regional approach towards Recovery Management whereby each of the participating Local Governments develop comprehensive Recovery Plans based upon an agreed template and, in the event of an emergency, be prepared to assist other Local Governments through a Partnering Agreement. This sharing of resources concept will greatly enhance Local Government’s capacity to deal with recovery arrangements where there is a shortage of equipment, facilities or personnel. It is considered that the long term benefits of a co-ordinated approach to recovery management would be:
· Clarity and uniformity of Recovery Plans.
· Development of an improved network of agencies and stakeholders.
· Better use of scarce resources.
· Availability of a larger pool of resources.
· Better availability of specific resources that may not be available in some councils.
· Consistent approach in dealing with the state government agencies.
The City of Wanneroo has been involved as a key stakeholder throughout the development of the Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group Partnering Agreement for the Provision of Mutual Aid for Recovery During Emergencies, which is defined in Attachment 1.
Detail
State Recovery Arrangements are well defined but the assumption that the State Government will effectively be able to independently fully meet local communities’ recovery needs following a large scale emergency event is not realistic in the context that the State Government has only one full time paid employee fully dedicated to coordinating State recovery operations. Furthermore emergencies of a moderate scale can occur which do not trigger a formal State Government recovery response, which consigns the recovery task to the local authority(s) affected by an emergency event.
It is for this reason that there is merit in local authorities formalising a Partnering Agreement for mutual aid which will provide clear definitions for such arrangements which would possibly spontaneously emerge anyway after a serious emergency event where a local authority’s capacity to provide adequate levels of recovery support is challenged. A Partnering Agreement therefore formalises otherwise loose arrangements and makes it clear what the level of help should be and the responsibility relating to the division of costs. Also, because the Local Recovery Plans of each participating local government will include a resource directory it will enable a quick and efficient means of sourcing assistance. The agreement will also increase the range of local governments that can be contacted should the need for assistance arise.
It is envisaged that assistance may be in the form of equipment or personnel. The provider of the support would be responsible for all legislative costs associated with employees and equipment (eg wages, workers’ compensation insurance and vehicle licensing costs) and the requestor of the support would pay for incidental costs such as travel, catering, accommodation, fuel and plant maintenance.
The Partnering Agreement will be for one year initially with an option to extend for a further three years. Any participating Council can withdraw in writing at any time or the Partnering Agreement can be withdrawn completely subject to the mutual agreement of all parties.
The proposed signatories to the Partnering Agreement are:
City of Wanneroo
City of Joondalup
City of Stirling
City of Swan
City of Bayswater
Town of Bassendean
Shire of Mundaring
Shire of Kalamunda
Comment
The Partnering Agreement is regarded as an innovative strategy for the mutual benefit of participating local governments to enable external assistance in the event that a local government is overwhelmed by the immediate circumstances of an emergency. It is emphasised that the arrangements are intended to be for a short duration up to a week and that beyond this, help would only be available subject to further negotiation and agreement in writing.
The development of comprehensive Recovery Plans based on an agreed template is regarded as advancement on current arrangements and will assist participating Local Governments to more effectively manage recovery. Each Local Government and each of the Government Agencies involved will have a copy of the Recovery Plan of each of the participating Local Governments to use as a resource in the event of an emergency. These plans will be referenced to, and operate in conjunction with, the State Recovery Plan (administered by the Department of Community Development).
The Partnering Agreement is considered to also be an initiative that will facilitate training/experience benefits that can potentially be derived from staff participating in the recovery operations of a partnered local authority, following a serious emergency event. Since the associated cost burden for the contributing local authority is limited to normal employee costs, cost liabilities are considered to be sufficiently limited. It is possible that those local authorities with day labour workforces could be most in demand for plant and equipment but such operating costs are to be borne by the requesting local authority.
An important benefit will be the facilitation of rotation rosters of trained staff to ensure adequate rest and recuperation can be provided to staff at the local authority affected by a serious emergency event. Typically there are not sufficient numbers of trained staff within each local authority to sufficiently accommodate after hours work demands. During previous bushfire emergencies, the City has been reliant on State Emergency Service resource assistance in order to give City staff sufficient break between shifts.
At this stage the only shortcoming assessed to possibly emerge within the local government industry is a rural local authority view that rural communities, who are possibly most vulnerable, will not be availed of the same level of safeguard even if they enter into similar partnering agreements with neighbouring shires. The metropolitan partnering agreements could therefore ultimately be considered to be providing a far more generous resource pool than those available in rural areas and it is therefore anticipated that arrangements may evolve over time to facilitate voluntary metropolitan-rural mutual aid agreements.
One of the most important characteristics of the emergency management context against which this Partnering Agreement proposal needs to be considered, is the absence of any inefficiency or bureaucracy in relation to State recovery arrangements. Secondment and partnering principles are considered to be a sensible approach for society to adopt to avert the excessive administration costs associated with maintaining a purpose defined recovery service resource to address risks that typically do not beset communities on a frequent basis. This model is therefore considered appropriate in the current emergency risk environment context.
All of the proposed Partnership Agreement stakeholder local authorities are in the process of seeking Council endorsement of this proposal. It is then proposed to hold a special function to enable the Chief Executive Officers of participating Councils, or their representatives, to formally sign the Partnership Agreement in order to recognise the significance of the event. This is anticipated to be in October 2004, however at this stage no further details are available as to the venue or date.
Statutory Compliance
On 18 July 1985, State Cabinet approved the establishment of a State Counter Disaster Advisory Committee to undertake the role of determining policy and planning.
“Policy Statement No 7 – Western Australian Emergency Management Arrangements” has been generated in response to this Cabinet decision and is the overarching policy document that reflects the findings of the Barchard and Evaluation Group Reports of 1997. Debate persists as to whether these arrangements should be formalised in legislation but it is generally agreed that the policies developed in response to the 1985 State Cabinet decision generate clearly defined obligations for agencies including local authorities toward State Government requirements in relation to emergency management arrangements and are more responsive to emergent changing needs than legislation. The Partnering Agreement is an enhancement to these existing obligatory arrangements and there is therefore no compulsion on Council to agree to this proposal.
Strategic Implications
Participation in this proposed Partnering Agreement is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies as follows:
“Healthy Communities
2.4 Support safe and secure communities”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Financial liabilities from the Partnering Agreement would be limited to legislative costs associated with employees and equipment such as wages, workers’ compensation, insurance and vehicle licensing costs for up to one week when contributing assistance to another local authority. This expense could be offset by temporarily suspending officer(s)’ normal work activity and not backfilling the position(s).
Costs associated with receiving recovery assistance from other local authorities would typically include travel, accommodation, catering, plant operating, fuel and maintenance costs. Such expenses would typically be presented as budget reallocation recommendations for Council approval post emergency event.
Equitable participation in the Partnering Agreement over time would be fostered as a principle to evenly distribute cost liabilities and participating Councils would maintain the option of withdrawing from the Partnering Agreement at any time if concerns emerge over future financial implications.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council SUPPORTS City of Wanneroo becoming a signatory to the Metropolitan North and East Recovery Group Partnering Agreement for the Provision of Mutual Aid for Recovery During Emergencies.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0004V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: David McKenna
Meeting Date: 25 May 2004
File Name: AMotor Vehicle Replacement Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the introduction of a policy to cover replacement intervals, purchasing and disposal methods to manage the City’s light vehicle fleet.
Background
At the Ordinary Council meeting of 26 November 2002, the following part one of a recommendation (report CS10-11/02 refers) was endorsed:
“That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the “buy back” of the City’s Light Fleet in accordance with the proposal outlined in CS10-11/02.”
Purchasing of light vehicles began in 2003 and a replacement strategy was adopted on a nominal basis for the purposes of budgeting. The purpose of this policy is to provide a more developed and up to date policy to enable cost effective management of the City’s light vehicle fleet.
Detail
1. General
Approximately 50% of vehicle fleet costs are associated with the replacement of vehicles ie. replacement cost being the costs of the new vehicle less the sale value realised on disposing of the existing vehicle. The remaining costs comprise the operating component ie. fuel and servicing costs. In most circumstances it has been found that the dominant factor governing replacement vehicles is the effect of resale values over time, as such items as servicing and fuel costs only vary minimally with time. This factor of fleet vehicle ownership has become more important than in the past as operating costs have been reduced significantly by improved vehicle reliability ie. less repair costs, extended vehicle servicing intervals and longer manufacturers’ warranty periods.
For reasons mentioned above the analysis undertaken focuses on minimising the replacement and purchasing costs as operating costs are not as critical in consideration of different replacement intervals. Likewise in many cases the policy is geared to minimising replacement costs over time and as such, choice of vehicles in respect of anticipated resale values is critical.
The market place resale value of vehicles varies according to such factors as supply and demand. As the market fluctuates, so should such details as replacement intervals and types of vehicles to purchase. For this reason it is recommended that the policy in fact not be fixed in terms of replacement intervals.
2. Purchasing Method
Three basic methods of purchasing were considered, those being - contracts involving long term supply and buy back, public tender for outright purchase and utilisation of the State Government Motor Vehicle Contract.
Long Term Supply Arrangements
This method involves entering into an arrangement/agreement with a motor vehicle dealer for the supply and buy back of vehicles. This method was discounted for the following reasons:-
· Does not offer flexibility.
· Risks taken by the supplier are reflected in the prices.
· Is difficult to construct such an arrangement in accordance with the Local Government Act.
The only other council known to have entered into this type of arrangement has found it to be very expensive and inflexible.
Public Tender
This method involves the purchase of vehicles by the public open tender process and includes for the sale of the existing vehicle as a ‘trade in’. This method has been undertaken by council previously and provides for good purchases prices and ease of disposal of the existing vehicle. It also guarantees a definite vehicle ‘changeover price’ as opposed to arrangements involving the City having to arrange disposal of the old vehicle.
This method is however very expensive to undertake as it involves considerable costs in advertising, tender document preparation and stationery, handling enquiries from the public, making existing vehicles available for viewing, tender assessment, awarding and also consideration by Council for approving the contract. It has been estimated that purchasing costs associated with this method are between $1,400 and $1,700 per vehicle depending on how many vehicles are included in the tender. Other councils have confirmed this cost.
State Government Motor Vehicle Contract
Use of the current State Government Motor Vehicle Contract is the recommended method of purchasing. This contract is a common use contract and the City is able to purchase vehicles via this contract in accordance with the Local Government Act. Purchasing costs associated with use of this Contract are estimated at only $200 per vehicle. The actual cost of the vehicles is, in general the same as would be obtained through the public tender process.
The process is simple to use and enables the City to purchase vehicles at value for money prices. As some categories of vehicles are often not held in stock it will allow the City the benefit of being able to place an order with a dealer that can better guarantee supply of the vehicle in a time frame to best suit the City’s requirements.
The decision on what make of vehicle to purchase within a particular category will be made as per the usual tender assessment practice considering the whole of life costs ie. purchase price, servicing costs, fuel costs and resale value. The vehicle within a category is also required to meet specific operational requirements. The choice of dealer to place the order with will firstly be a dealer located within the City’s boundaries, subject to being able to supply the vehicle within the required timeframe.
3. Disposal Method
Vehicles are required to be disposed of by a method that offers optimum resale value. They are also required to be disposed of promptly after replacement in order to minimize costs such as licensing, insurance depreciation and repair which are all still incurred after a vehicle is replaced. As vehicles are proposed to be purchased via the State Government Contract, and ‘trading in’ is not an option it is recommended that they be disposed of via a public auction house. As most houses have weekly auctions they can be disposed of quickly at a cost of only $300 per vehicle including detailing.
Whilst the auction house method is recommended as the standard approach, it is also recommended that City sell vehicles by tender on an infrequent basis. This would provide information as to which is the most cost effective method. There may be local interest in the vehicles as most of the auction houses are located quite some distance from Wanneroo.
4. Recommended Replacement Intervals
Four Cylinder Sedan
It is recommended that a 3 year/80,000 Km interval be adopted for these vehicles.
This recommendation is based on the following information:
· An evaluation of resale values from actual vehicle sales.
· Calculations of the resale value of vehicles were adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicles due to inflation.
· Disposal and purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700.
· A purchase price of $ 16,577 GST exclusive.
· Total costs as shown include only those deemed to affect economic life decisions eg fuel is constant over the life and hence is not factored. Servicing costs, tyre repair and battery replacement costs have been factored based on estimates and RACV published figures. An analysis showed that ownership costs per kilometre decreased with utilisation.
A comparison of costs versus kilometres travelled is outlined in the table below:
Age |
Km’s |
Resale |
Replacement Cost/km |
Comparative Operating Costs/km |
Total |
2 years |
40,000 |
$13,600 |
12.3c |
2.5c |
14.8c |
3 years |
60,000 |
$13,000 |
9.1c |
2.5c |
11.6c |
3 years |
80,000 |
$12,500 |
7.4c |
2.7c |
10.1c |
Ownership beyond 3 years is not recommended as repair costs will increase and will not be covered by warranty. Ownership beyond 80,000 kms is not recommended as it is considered that resale will fall and reliability will become an issue. In the past council vehicles in this class when kept for periods in excess of 80,000 Kms started to require major repairs.
Six Cylinder Sedan/Wagon Medium & Basic
It is recommended that a 2 year/60,000 Km interval be adopted for these vehicles.
This recommendation is based on the following information:
· An evaluation of resale values from actual vehicle sales for a Commodore Executive (Basic) and a Falcon Futura (Medium).
· Calculations of the resale value of vehicles were adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicles due to inflation.
· Disposal and purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700
· A purchase cost of a Commodore Executive for $ 24,055 and Falcon Futura for $ 27,200.
· Total costs as shown include only those deemed to affect economic life decisions eg fuel is constant over the life and hence is not factored. Servicing costs, tyre repair and battery replacement costs have been factored based on estimates and RACV published figures. An analysis showed that ownership costs per kilometre decreased with utilisation.
Calculations for a nominal replacement period of one year and three years were carried out and were found to be more expensive than a two year replacement period.
Six Cylinder Executive Class Sedan
It is recommended that a 12 months unlimited kilometer interval be adopted for these vehicles.
This recommendation is based on the following information:
· An evaluation of resale values from actual vehicle sales
· Calculations of the resale value of vehicles were adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicles due to inflation.
· Disposal and purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700.
· A purchase cost of $ 34,563 for a Falcon Fairmont Ghia.
· Operating costs are not relevant to economic life considerations for this class of vehicle. Ownership costs per kilometer decrease with utilization – but only very marginally.
Resale costs for one and two year old vehicles were examined and it was found that there was a substantial difference in resale values between these two ages. The graphs were from Fowles website. To confirm this information was also sourced from Redbook and relevant costs are shown below:-
Age |
Km’s |
Resale (GST inc.) |
Replacement Cost/Km |
1 year |
20,000 |
$37,400 |
6c |
2 years |
40,000 |
$35,450 |
7.5c |
It is noted that this standard of vehicle is provided to Directors as part of their employment contract.
Six Cylinder Luxury Sedan
It is recommended that a 12 months unlimited kilometre interval be adopted for these vehicles.
This recommendation is based on the following information:
· Resale values obtained from Redbook.
· Disposal and purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700.
· A purchase cost of $ 35,468 GST Exc for a Holden Statesman.
· Operating costs are not relevant to economic life considerations for this class of vehicle.
Resale costs for one and two year old vehicles were examined and it was found that there was a substantial difference in resale values between these two ages:-
Age |
Km’s |
Resale (GST inc.) |
Replacement Cost/Km |
1 year |
20,000 |
$43,125 |
(15c) |
2 years |
40,000 |
$31,600 |
19c |
It is noted that this standard of vehicle is generally provided to Mayors and Chief Executive Officers.
Four Cylinder Utility
It is recommended that a 3 year/100,000 Km interval be adopted as a nominal replacement interval for these vehicles with consideration given to extending the replacement interval to 4 years/120,000 Kms based on the vehicles condition, maintenance history and application.
The resale values are from Glass’s Motor Vehicle Dealers guide using a Mitsubishi Triton vehicle. The resale value of the vehicle in the calculations has been adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicle due to inflation. Disposal, purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700. The purchase cost of a Hilux ute is $15,542.
Age |
Km’s |
Resale |
Replacement Cost/Km |
2 years |
40,000 |
$12,222 |
13c |
3 years |
80,000 |
$11,087 |
8c |
3 years |
100,000 |
$10,950 |
6c |
4 years |
120,000 |
$10,870 |
5c |
Maintenance and repair costs have not been included in the above assessment as they are considered not to vary per kilometer within the ranges examined. Warranty will cover any repairs within this period. Owning the vehicles beyond 100,000 Kms or 3 years is not recommended as a policy as maintenance and repair costs will increase . There is no known available information to assess ownership costs beyond 100,000 Kms however there is a possibility that there may be savings by owning this type of vehicle longer and for this reason it is recommended that a trial to keep a number of vehicles for up to 4 years and 120,000Kms.
Six Cylinder Utility
It is recommended that a 3 year/100,000 Km interval be adopted as a nominal replacement interval for these vehicles with consideration given to extending the replacement interval to 4 years/120,000 Kms based on the vehicles condition, maintenance history and application.
The resale values are from Fowles Auctioneers Website guide using a Ford Falcon utility as an example. The resale value of the vehicle in the calculations has been adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicle due to inflation. Disposal, purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700. The purchase cost of a Falcon ute is $ 21,439.
Age |
Km’s |
Resale |
Replacement Cost/Km |
2 years |
40,000 |
$18,000 |
14c |
3 years |
80,000 |
$16,000 |
9c |
3 years |
100,000 |
$15,050 |
8.5c |
Maintenance and repair costs have not been included in the above assessment as they are considered not to vary per kilometer within the ranges examined. Warranty will cover any repairs within this period. Owning the vehicles beyond 100,000 Kms or 3 years is not recommended as a policy maintenance as repair costs will increase. There is no known available information to assess ownership costs beyond 100,000 Kms however there is a possibility that there may be savings by owning this type of vehicle longer and for this reason it is recommended that a trial to keep a number of vehicles for up to 4 years and 120,000Kms.
Six Cylinder Utility (LPG)
Scenarios for 6 cylinder LPG vehicles are considered to be similar to the petrol engined version with the exception that due to higher purchase prices and lower relative resale values that it will be more beneficial to retain these vehicles for a longer period of time. Similarly it is recommended that they be kept for 3 years/100,000 Kms with a number of vehicles kept for a longer period on a trial basis.
Four Wheel Drive Utility
It is recommended that a 3 year/100,000 Km interval be adopted for these vehicles.
The resale values are from Glass’s Motor Vehicle Dealers guide using a Mitsubishi Triton vehicle. The resale value of the vehicle in the calculations has been adjusted to take into account higher expected resale of current vehicle due to inflation. Disposal, purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700.
Age |
Km’s |
Resale |
Replacement Cost/Km |
2 years |
40,000 |
$22,000 |
13c |
2 years |
80,000 |
$21,000 |
8c |
3 years |
60,000 |
$20,000 |
12c |
3 years |
100,000 |
$18,000 |
8c |
Maintenance and repair costs have not been included in the above assessment as they are considered not to vary per kilometer within the ranges examined. Warranty will cover any repairs within this period. Owning the vehicles beyond 100,000 Kms or 3 years is not recommended as a policy maintenance and repair costs will increase.
Rangers who are often required to work in remote locations and at all hours and require very reliable vehicles use this class of vehicle. There is no known available information to assess ownership costs beyond 100,000 Kms however there is a possibility that there may be savings by owning this type of vehicle longer and for this reason it is recommended that a trial to keep a number of vehicles for up to 160,000Kms be considered.
One Tonne Van 2 Wheel Drive
It is recommended that a 3 year/100,000 Km interval be adopted as a nominal replacement interval for these vehicles – with consideration given to extending the replacement interval to 4 years/120,000 Kms based on the vehicles condition, maintenance history and application.
The following table shows expected costs for a Mitsubishi Express Van based on re-sale values obtained from Redbook. Disposal, purchasing administration costs have been estimated at $700. Cost of a new Express is $21,969.
Age |
Km’s |
Resale |
Replacement Cost/Km |
2 years |
40,000 |
$13,000 |
27c |
3 years |
60,000 |
$12,000 |
20c |
3 years |
100,000 |
$10,450 |
13c |
Maintenance and repair costs have not been included in the above assessment as they are considered not to vary per kilometer within the ranges examined. Warranty will cover any repairs within this period. Owning the vehicles beyond 100,000 Kms or 3 years is not recommended as a policy maintenance as repair costs will increase. There is no known available information to assess ownership costs beyond 100,000 Kms however there is a possibility that there may be savings by owning this type of vehicle longer and for this reason it is recommended that a trial to keep a number of vehicles for up to 4 years and 160,000Kms.
Luxury 4WD Vehicles
The standard of vehicle currently allocated to the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer is a luxury 4WD vehicle. The standard and replacement times of these vehicles will be dependent on their conditions of appointment in the respective positions.
Hybrid Vehicles
The purchase of a hybrid vehicle has been included on the 2004/2005 Plant Replacement Program. Purchasing a Hybrid vehicle will demonstrate the City’s support of environmental issues and also to act as a trial on the effectiveness/economics of utilising this type of vehicle within the fleet. When purchased the vehicle would be allocated to an officer with higher than average utilisation. Decals on the vehicle are proposed, promoting the City’s trial of the vehicle and commitment to sustainability.
Should the trial prove successful, replacement periods for the vehicle will be calculated.
Overall Recommended Replacement Intervals
The following table details recommended replacement intervals for the majority of different classes of vehicles owned and operated by council. Vehicles types not included in the table below will be replaced as determined by the Fleet Steering Committee.
The reasoning behind each recommendation is detailed in the attachments and in summary has been done by determining minimum whole of life ownership and operating costs whilst also considering risks and reliability issues. The recommendations have been made with consideration to what is considered best practise by other larger fleet operators.
CLASS OF VEHICLE |
EXAMPLE |
REPLACEMENT INTERVAL |
Four Cylinder Sedan |
Nissan Pulsar |
3 years or 80,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan/Wagon Basic |
Magna/Commodore Executive /Falcon Forte |
2 years or 60,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan/Wagon Medium |
Commodore Acclaim/Falcon Futura |
2 years or 60,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan Executive Class |
Holden Calais/ Fairmont Ghia |
1 year unlimited |
Six Cylinder Sedan Luxury Class |
Statesman/Fairlane |
1 year unlimited |
Four Cylinder Utility 2wd |
Hilux |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Utility 2wd |
Falcon/Commodore |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Utility 2wd (LPG) |
Falcon |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
One Tonne Utility 4wd |
Mitsubishi Triton |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
One Tonne Van 2wd |
Mitsubishi Express |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
Comment
The purpose of this proposed Light Fleet Replacement Policy is to provide a more developed and up to date policy to enable cost effective management of the City’s light vehicle fleet.
Statutory Compliance
The City will purchase vehicles utilising the Department of Industry and Technology Motor Vehicle Acquisition common use contract (Contract No. 012A1994) and when deemed appropriate by the City’s Fleet Steering Committee, Tenders may be invited and evaluated against the respective selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
Strategic Implications
The provision of suitable light vehicles for operational purposes is consistent with the City Of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan (2002-2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of the community”
Policy Implications
The purpose of this report is to recommend the implementation of a Light Vehicle Fleet Replacement Policy.
The intent of the proposed Policy is to provide clear guidelines to the City’s Fleet Steering Committee for the purchase and disposal of the City’s light vehicle fleet.
Drafting of this policy supports Council’s objective of developing policies within the City.
Financial Implications
The budget for the purchase and disposal of the City’s Light Fleet will be included in the Council approved Annual Plant Replacement Program.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Officer/Policy & Local Laws Committee Recommendation: 17/08/2004
That Council ADOPT the proposed Light Fleet Replacement Policy shown detailed below:
Light Vehicle Fleet Replacement Policy
Policy No.
Policy Owner: Technical Services
Distribution: All employees
Implementation: 1 September 2004
Scheduled Review: 1 September 2007
Objective
To ensure that processes are in place in relation to replacement intervals, purchasing and disposal methods to manage the City’s light vehicle fleet.
Statement
The purpose of the policy is to minimise vehicle ownership costs to the City in line with industry best practice, whilst ensuring provision of a suitable fleet for use by staff to undertake their duties.
Purchasing Method
Lights vehicles shall be purchased by using the current State Government Motor Vehicle Supply Contract. Vehicles may also be purchased, as requirements dictate, by using the Public Open Tender method.
Disposal Method
Light vehicles should be disposed of via auction at a public auction house. Vehicles may also be sold by the tender process in order to gauge resale values by this method.
Vehicle Specification/Class
The selection of vehicle class and specification should be carried out with consideration to optimising resale value. Analysis of vehicle ownership costs has indicated that purchasing a higher standard of vehicle than actually required by the City offers in many cases , a greater cost effective outcome than purchasing the more standard vehicle.
Colour
All operational vehicles are to be supplied in white. Private use vehicles may be coloured and consideration may also be given to the supply of coloured vehicles that have limited private use.
The choice of colours shall be as deemed appropriate by the Fleet Steering Committee.
Replacement Intervals
The following table details recommended replacement intervals for the different classes of vehicles owned and operated by council.
CLASS OF VEHICLE |
EXAMPLE |
REPLACEMENT INTERVAL |
Four Cylinder Sedan |
Nissan Pulsar |
3 years or 80,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan/ Wagon Basic |
Magna/Commodore Executive/Falcon Forte |
2 years or 60,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan/ Wagon Medium |
Commodore Acclaim/Falcon Futura |
2 years or 60,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Sedan Executive Class |
Holden Calais/Fairmont Ghia |
1 year unlimited |
Six Cylinder Sedan Luxury Class |
Statesman/Fairlane |
1 year unlimited |
Four Cylinder Utility 2wd |
Hilux |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Utility 2wd |
Falcon/Commodore |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
Six Cylinder Utility 2wd (LPG) |
Falcon |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
One Tonne Utility 4wd |
Mitsubishi Triton |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
One Tonne Van 2wd |
Mitsubishi Express |
3 years or 100,000 Kms |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: SP/0020V01
File Name: GAWannero Town Centre Revitalisation Project Partnership Agreement Memorandum of Understanding .doc This line will not
Level 3 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by jan Date 19 August 2004be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Technical Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Author: Alan McGregor
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider a proposal for a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), previously called Partnership Agreement with the State Government for the revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre.
Background
In May 2003, Mayor Jon Kelly wrote to the Premier suggesting a Partnership approach to the revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre. The partnership model suggested was based on the one used by the State Government and the City of Gosnells for the Maddington/Kenwick Sustainable Communities Initiative.
The letter to the Premier identified a number of key projects within the Town Centre Master Plan, aimed at the revitalisation of the Town Centre as a major cultural and economic hub for the City of Wanneroo. Government support and funding was requested for key public facilities and infrastructure including the library/regional museum, upgrading of Aquamotion, public transport improvements, landscaping works and the relocation of the Wanneroo War Memorial.
The Premier referred the proposal to the Minister for Local Government and Regional Development who provided a positive response to the partnership proposal. At a subsequent meeting with Ministerial representatives and the MLA for Wanneroo Diane Guise, it was agreed that a draft partnership agreement would be prepared and forwarded to the State Government under the State/Local Government Partnerships Agreement.
Council considered this initiative at the 16 December 2003 meeting and resolved to:
AGREE in Principle to the proposal for a Partnership Agreement with the State Government for the revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre, and authorises the Chief Executive Officer to progress negotiations with the State Government prior to submitting a final agreement to Council for consideration.
At the same meeting, Council agreed to advertise a business plan dealing with a land disposition between the City and Wanneroo Central Pty Ltd, the owners of the Wanneroo Shopping Centre. This transaction is required to facilitate a staged redevelopment of the shopping centre, which is considered a major element of the Town Centre Revitalisation.
Detail
An earlier draft of the Partnership Agreement provided a framework for a number of key State Government agencies, the private sector and the community to become involved in the revitalisation of the Town Centre. It was based on the City of Gosnells Partnership Agreement.
The CEO met with officers of the Department of Premier and Cabinet this year to negotiate a mutual arrangement for the City with the State Government based on the draft in principle agreement by Council.
The Department of Premier and Cabinet recently advised of its preference to now refer to these arrangements as a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), rather than a ‘Partnership Agreement’. This stems from Crown Solicitor’s recent advice that these arrangements do not have any legal standing.
Attachment 1 is a draft of the proposed MOU. It provides a framework and management structure and is based more along the lines of the Geraldton Partnership Agreement that is generic in its managerial structure and roles.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
This proposal has been developed co-jointly with the City’s Project Manager and the Department of Premier and Cabinet Senior Policy Officer.
Statutory Compliance
The Memorandum of Understanding as detailed in Attachment One requires the formation of a Technical Advisory Group and various Project Teams. As these groups are in many ways project management teams and are formed under the MOU they are not considered a committee as defined under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
The Memorandum of Understanding is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2002 – 2005) goals and strategies:
“Healthy Communities
2.1 Achieve and understanding of our community’s needs – resent and future
Economic Develop
3.2 Identify, support and respond to the needs of existing and new industries”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The City and State will commit to supporting the managerial structures from within their existing resources. The allocation of funds from existing sources from either party to support initiatives developed through the MOU will remain the contributing parties responsibility
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the proposal for a Memorandum of Understanding with the State Government for the revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre and AUTHORISES the Mayor to sign this Memorandum of Understanding as detailed in Attachment One.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 10
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
WANNEROO TOWN CENTRE DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
THE GOVERNMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
AND
THE CITY OF WANNEROO
Draft 17 August 2004
(Note: Yet to be formally considered by the City of Wanneroo or the State Government)
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 10
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is based on the outcome of discussions between the City of Wanneroo and State Government Representatives. Reference is made to the following correspondence:
City of Wanneroo to the Premier, dated 15 May 2003
Minister for Local Government to the City of Wanneroo dated 12 August 2003
City of Wanneroo to the Minister for Local Government dated 21 November 2003
The proposals for the Wanneroo Town Centre are based on extensive master planning exercise carried out by the City of Wanneroo over an eight-year period. The MOU is made under the State/Local Government Partnerships Agreement, Partnership Agreement Template now known as a Memorandum of Understanding.
1. Statement of Purpose
A Memorandum of Understanding for the revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre so that it becomes a major cultural and commercial hub of the City of Wanneroo, Perth Western Australia.
What is proposed, but not limited to?
· Refurbishment of the “Old Civic Centre” to create a community facility which will become the new location of the Wanneroo Senior Citizen’s Club and other community groups,
· Close the Wanneroo Senior Citizens to allow for a land transfer to be undertaken by the City and the owners of the Wanneroo Central Shopping Centre to facilitate the extension of the shopping centre facilities,
· Development of the corner of Dundebar Road and Rocca Way incorporating the Wanneroo Library, a Regional Museum and Exhibition Centre,
· Co-ordination with the Shopping Centre developers to enhance the accessibility of all the facilities, through the provision of safer pedestrian walkways, linking major facilities in the Town Centre and,
· Enhance the Wanneroo Road Streetscape including underground power.
· City of Wanneroo
· Western Australian Government
State agencies or Government Trading Enterprises that may be subject to the conditions of the MOU include:
Department of the Premier and Cabinet
Department for Community Development
Department of Culture and the Arts
Department of Local Government and Regional Development
Main Roads Western Australia
Department for Planning and Infrastructure
Department of Conservation and Land Management
Department of Sport and Recreation
Office of Energy
Major family and business community outcomes sought in working towards revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre include:
· Active involvement of the community in all aspects of the Town Centre Revitalisation.
· Progressive achievement of greater liveability of Wanneroo’s urban form and a greater sense of place within the communities of Wanneroo.
· Re-establishment of the Wanneroo Town Centre as the major cultural and commercial hub in the City of Wanneroo.
· Effective rationalisation of local government and state government land assets within the Town Centre.
· Contribution of the Town Centre Revitalisation to the economic development of Wanneroo.
· Enhancement to the social well being of residents
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 10
· Complementary administrative/process outcomes sought include:
· Establishment of effective alliances with Federal Government Agencies, Non Government organisations and the Business Community.
· Progressive documentation and assessment of the Town Centre Revitalisation, made available as a model for other communities and organisations to learn from.
Overarching Principle
A commitment to improve cooperation between State and Local Government to enhance social, environmental and economic development of the City of Wanneroo in a sustainable way and particularly within the suburb of Wanneroo. This is to be achieved through consultation, communication, participation, cooperation and collaboration at both strategic and project levels.
General Principles
Recognise that partnerships:
· between State and Local Government are essential to achieve social, environmental and economic development for the Wanneroo community;
· should be flexible and open to new approaches to service delivery and funding; and
· should be sensitive and responsive to the needs and constraints of both spheres of government at the local level.
The parties involved will:
· identify and understand the roles and responsibilities of both spheres of government;
· ensure that these roles and responsibilities are considered and respected in all government decisions; and
· recognise and respect the role that each plays in enhancing social, environmental and economic development of Wanneroo.
A commitment to communication that:
· is open and timely on issues of relevance to social, environmental and economic development of Wanneroo;
· recognises the need for confidentiality of discussions until a mutually agreed time; and
· recognises that State and Local Government may use different processes to communicate with constituent groups.
Wanneroo’s community vision will guide the Town Centre Revitalisation through all stages.
Ongoing consultation and the visioning process will:
·
· be purposeful, occurring at mutually agreed stages to facilitate understanding and agreement; and
·
·
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 10
recognise
and account for the different decision making processes of both spheres of
government.
A commitment to continual improvements in service delivery:
· efficiency;
· effectiveness;
· timeliness; and
· appropriateness.
The key parties will effectively and efficiently co-ordinate the design, implementation and finalisation of the Town Centre Revitalisation.
MOU accountability will be characterised by:
· a transparent approach where changes to roles, responsibilities and budgets are negotiated and agreed and resources necessary to implement changes are identified;
· open assessments of the effectiveness of agreements; and
· clearly defined reporting, dispute resolution and review mechanisms.
5. Scope Of The Memorandum of Understanding
This MOU is for the development and implementation of the Town Centre Revitalisation to be undertaken between 2004/05 and 2007/08.
Resources
It is understood that the initial MOU is an expression of intent by the parties to undertake, as determined by the parties, Town Centre Revitalisation activities that will occur within existing resources.
The allocation of substantial funds from existing sources by either party, to the Town Centre Revitalisation, will remain the contributing party’s sub activity with public recognition to be made accordingly.
2004/ 2005 Town Centre Revitalisation Development
The formalisation of the master planning phase of the Town Centre Revitalisation is to occur by the second quarter of the 2004/05 financial year.
Issues to be addressed
· Engaging the community(s) of Wanneroo to identify:
an agreed community vision;
community assets and needs;
strengths and weaknesses of urban fabric;
economic development assets and inhibiters;
environmental impacts of current activities and future developments; and
environmental opportunities and assets.
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 6 of 10
· Further developing and workshopping the proposals for revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre.
· Identifying strategies to achieve revitalisation of the Wanneroo Town Centre
Strategies to be adopted
The use of existing planning processes and community consultation best practice to identify a community vision for the Wanneroo Town Centre. The implementation plan is to set out clearly and concisely the approach taken.
2004/2008 Wanneroo Town Centre Implementation
The outcomes of the Town Centre Revitalisation’s development phase are to be formulated into a comprehensive implementation plan. The Plan is to include:
· A review of the MOU scope and operation.
· An outline of the responsibilities of the parties to Town Centre Revitalisation activities.
· A breakdown of all Town Centre Revitalisation activities and their resource implications including efficiencies and savings. Town Centre Revitalisation activities should be separated in to those requiring additional resources and those that will be undertaken within current resources.
· The identification of additional resources is to be made where feasible.
· A strategy for both parties to finalise the MOU by 2008.
The Implementation Plan is to be presented to the City of Wanneroo Council and the State Government of Western Australia for endorsement at which point individual activities requiring additional resources can be considered on a case-by-case basis.
6. Management Structure and Process
Composition and Role
Technical Advisory Group - Composition
To pursue the joint objectives of the State Government and the City of Wanneroo in relation to the Wanneroo Town Centre Revitalisation Project, a Technical Advisory Group shall be established, comprised of representatives of the City of Wanneroo and key State Government agencies.
The Technical Advisory Group will be jointly hosted and co-Chaired by the City of Wanneroo (Town Centre Project Manager) and the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (Director Revitalisation and Urban Design), and will be primarily supported by the City of Wanneroo and the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
The Technical Advisory Group will report, not less than annually, to the Office of the Premier and the City Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee (WTCAC).
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 7 of 10
Department of
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo, Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee |
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Director, Planning and Infrastructure |
|
|
Project Manager |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Technical Advisory Group |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Project Team 1 |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Project Team 2 |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Project Team 3 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
The State Government intention is to ensure decision-making level representation, at director level or similar, by all State agencies on, or meeting with, the Technical Advisory Group.
Technical Advisory Group - Role
The Technical Advisory Group will:
· Consider, advocate and promote developmental proposals.
· Facilitate the provision of authorative, key stakeholder advice on critical priorities, policies and standards associated with proposals and projects.
· Work to facilitate effective and balanced communication and consultation, between the MOU parties and also with the community, on proposals, projects and outcomes.
· To facilitate two-way communication between the Technical Advisory Group and the City of Wanneroo, Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee and the Department of Premier and Cabinet.
· Facilitate the provision of appropriate funding and other resource commitments to proposal and projects.
· Monitor and assess progress, operational and financial accountability of proposals and projects and provide appropriate status reports to State Government and the City of Wanneroo to support policy consideration and information dissemination.
Technical Advisory Group Membership
The Technical Advisory Group will be formed of representatives from the relevant State Government agencies at a Director level or similar and key administration staff from the City of Wanneroo.
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 8 of 10
Project Teams
That a small, flexible and multi-disciplinary Project Team be established to undertake each of the tasks needing to be addressed over the life of the Town Centre Revitalisation. The Project Teams will be co-ordinated by the Wanneroo Town Centre Project Manager and may include members of the public, non-government organisations, business and government agencies.
Project Team Membership/Administration
· Coordination
Wanneroo Town Centre Project Manager
· Other Members
The Technical Advisory Group will appoint members as appropriate to the task.
· Project Team Reporting Mechanisms
Each project team Project Manager and/or relevant members will report to the Technical Advisory Group as determined on a task-by-task basis. The Technical Advisory Group co-Chairs will report to the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Committee and the Department of the Premier and Cabinet.
Dispute Resolution
Disputes that arise within a Project Team and that cannot be resolved within the Team are to be referred to the Technical Advisory Group for resolution.
MOU Obligations- Major Works and Development
The State Government intention is to engage in proper consideration, consultation on and implementation of proposals or projects undertaken, planned or “approved “ by the state to ensure the social, environmental or economic wellbeing of the City of Wanneroo are not adversely affected by them.
The City of Wanneroo’s intention is to take into account and protect the State’s key infrastructure such as major transport routes and service corridors, in its planning and development of the city. The City’s intention is to consult with the relevant State agencies in relation to any proposals that may affect such facilities.
The City of Wanneroo and the State Government intentions are to establish steering or consultative committees for any major projects or studies that may have a major impact on either party. Such committee’s may involve representatives from the City, relevant State agencies, plus the local parliamentary representative, but no party shall be bound to participate. The Technical Advisory Group membership may be extended as deemed appropriate by the organisation with primary responsibility for the particular project or study.
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 9 of 10
The State Government intention is to consult with the City of Wanneroo including, where appropriate, through consultative committees, on any major State or private development subject to its approval, which may have a significant impact on the social or economic development, environment or amenity of the City of Wanneroo.
Management and Review
Coordination and review of the progress and implementation of this MOU will include review and reporting by the Technical Advisory Group to the Office of the Premier and the Wanneroo City Council, not less than annually, on the effectiveness of communication and cooperation between the parties, and on strategic project outcomes.
Coordination of approved Town Centre Revitalisations and specific projects to progress under the guidance of the Wanneroo Town Centre Project Manager.
In the event of an unresolvable dispute between parties actively engaged on the Project, the matter is to be referred to the Chief Executive Officer of the City of Wanneroo who will arrange to meet with the Chief Executive Officer(s) of the relevant other agency(s) involved, to determine a solution.
Prior to a party(s) decision to terminate its involvement in the Town Centre Revitalisation, the matter must be referred in writing to the Department of the Premier and Cabinet (on behalf of the Office of the Premier) and the Chief Executive Officer of the City of Wanneroo.
This is an arrangement made in good faith based on the commitment of the parties to an effective and sustainable MOU. It does not seek to establish a legal relationship between the parties.
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 10 of 10
Certificate
of Memorandum of Understanding
The State Government of Western Australia and the City of Wanneroo enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the intention of working cooperatively to achieve social, environmental and economical development of the Wanneroo Town Centre in a sustainable way.
The MOU recognises the role of the Wanneroo Town Centre as the hub of the City and the important function it plays in the sustainable development of the region.
The MOU has a particular focus and sets out commitments by both parties for the timely implementation of specific projects agreed to by the parties to the MOU.
As part of the MOU the undersigned agree to underlying principles and commitments, as outlined, on which the MOU arrangements are based.
Signed by The Hon Geoff Gallop, MLA Premier for and on behalf of the State of Western Australia
Sign Date
Before, Diane Guise, MLA, Member for Wanneroo
Sign Date
Signed by Jon Kelly, Mayor for and on behalf of the City of Wanneroo
Sign Date
Before Charles Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, City of Wanneroo
Sign Date
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S13/0002V01
File Name: BAWarrant of Payments For the Period to 31 July 2004.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 18 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by A Binnie Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Mike Cole Date 12 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Juanita Lee Date 06 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Juanita Lee
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of July 2004, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in July 2004:-
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers |
46586-47221 Batch Nos 1-20 |
$7,601,939.16 |
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account |
July Advance Recoup |
$4,627,867.57 |
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme BERKLEY ROAD CELL 7 CELL 6 CELL 5 CELL 3 |
000003 000011 000017 000012 000010 |
$1,456,398.64 $75,000.00 $911,350.91 $487,891.04 $43,431.00 |
At the close of July 2004 outstanding creditors amounted to $1,232,534.62.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The list of cheques and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of July 2004 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of cheques drawn for the month of July 2004, as summarised below:-.
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
City of Wanneroo - Director Corporate Services Advance Account Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers |
46586-47221 Batch Nos 1-20 |
$7,601,939.16 |
City of Wanneroo – Municipal Account |
July Advance Recoup |
$4,627,867.57 |
City of Wanneroo – Town Planning Scheme BERKLEY ROAD CELL 7 CELL 6 CELL 5 CELL 3 |
000003 000011 000017 000012 000010 |
$1,456,398.64 $75,000.00 $911,350.91 $487,891.04 $43,431.00 |
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2004 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO - DIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICES ADVANCE ACCOUNT |
CHEQUE |
DATE |
VENDOR |
AMOUNT |
DESCRIPTION |
|
46586 |
08/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
46587 |
08/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
46588 |
08/07/2004 |
JOONDALUP COURT |
$6,387.25 |
LEGAL FEES - SUMMONS FOR RATING SERVICES |
|
46589 |
09/07/2004 |
JOONDALUP COURT |
$1,763.40 |
LEGAL FEES - ISSUE WARRANTS RATING SERVICES |
|
46590 |
12/07/2004 |
JOONDALUP COURT |
$1,454.00 |
LEGAL FEES - WARRANTS FOR RATING SERVICES |
|
46591 |
12/07/2004 |
APPLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$330.73 |
APPLE COMPUTER RENTAL FOR GRAPHICS DEPARTMENT |
|
46592 |
12/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$50.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
46593 |
12/07/2004 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46594 |
12/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS ADULT DAY CARE |
$47.50 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46595 |
12/07/2004 |
ALINTA GAS |
$7,551.20 |
GAS SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES |
|
46596 |
12/07/2004 |
BEATRIX RAUSCH |
$323.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46597 |
12/07/2004 |
MS M BERTONE |
$60.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENTS |
|
46598 |
12/07/2004 |
MS S CAMPBELL |
$40.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46599 |
12/07/2004 |
DEPT OF LAND ADMINISTRATION |
$334.10 |
TITLE SEARCHES FOR RATING SERVICES RECTIFIED IMAGARY - PLANNING DEPARTMENT |
|
46600 |
12/07/2004 |
F ARRIGO |
$150,000.00 |
2ND INSTALMENT OF PURCHASE OF LOT 3 GNANGARA ROAD WANGARA - TPS |
|
46601 |
12/07/2004 |
GLAZEWELL PTY LTD |
$606.76 |
GLASS & GLAZING REPAIRS TO ANTHONY WARING CLUBROOMS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
46602 |
12/07/2004 |
MR R HANNAN |
$9.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46603 |
12/07/2004 |
HOMESWEST RENTALS |
$465.51 |
RATES REFUND P/N 155755 DUE TO STRATA TITLE |
|
46604 |
12/07/2004 |
KW INNS & KF PENNO |
$5,892.97 |
REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENDITURE &CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FEES FOR QUINNS ROCKS CARAVAN PARK 30/06/04 |
|
46605 |
12/07/2004 |
PAT PEARMAN |
$33.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46606 |
12/07/2004 |
PRIMUS TELECOM |
$242.35 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46607 |
12/07/2004 |
VOLUNTEERING WA |
$110.00 |
MEMBERSHIP FEES - COMMUNITY SERVICES (M TEALE) |
|
46609 |
12/07/2004 |
WANNEROO ELECTRIC |
$34,570.23 |
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS |
|
46610 |
12/07/2004 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$199.95 |
ROAD/FOOTPATH REINSTATMENTS DUE TO HYDRANT WORKS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46611 |
12/07/2004 |
MR F WEST |
$30.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46612 |
12/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - AQUAMOTION |
$467.42 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY99-01- 09/07/2004 |
|
46613 |
12/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - RATES |
$348.78 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: 30-JUN-0 30/06/2004 |
|
46614 |
12/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - SOCIAL CLUB |
$405.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY99-01- 09/07/2004 |
|
46615 |
12/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - LIMITED USE VEHICLES |
$350.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
46616 |
12/07/2004 |
WESTERN POWER |
$188,070.40 |
POWER SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS (INCLUDING STREET LIGHTING) |
|
46617 |
12/07/2004 |
OSBORNE CERAMIC CENTRE |
$102.85 |
TILES & GROUT FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM EVENTS |
|
46618 |
12/07/2004 |
ROY WESTON - WEMBLEY |
$250.00 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46619 |
12/07/2004 |
MS S M MALLON |
$115.20 |
REIMBURSEMENT FOR CINEMA TICKETS - CHICZ BIZ OUTING |
|
46620 |
12/07/2004 |
RICHARD NOBLE & CO |
$48,900.00 |
POS CLAIM FOR WORKS IN MINTARO PARK |
|
46621 |
12/07/2004 |
MR F L CAMPBELL |
$60.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46622 |
12/07/2004 |
MS H WHITMORE |
$24.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46623 |
12/07/2004 |
MS N O'HEARN |
$30.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46624 |
12/07/2004 |
VAN THAI NGUYEN |
$48.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46625 |
12/07/2004 |
PAT DUMARESQ |
$77.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46626 |
12/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE |
$80.45 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46627 |
12/07/2004 |
MR R M PEAKE |
$735.85 |
REIMBURSEMENT – EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MELBOURNE 7-13/12/02 REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES - UDIA CONF 21-23 AUG 2003 KARRI VALLEY |
|
46628 |
12/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
$286.00 |
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SEMINAR 7/7/04 - C PENHEIRO, R BAIRSTOW, B PAWLENKO & C LUXFORD |
|
46629 |
12/07/2004 |
WA LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOC |
$110.00 |
2004 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REMUNERATION SURVEY - CORPORATE RESOURCES |
|
46630 |
12/07/2004 |
TAX REPORTER |
$110.00 |
PROPERTY INVESTMENT & TAXATION GUIDE - FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
46631 |
12/07/2004 |
TARGET JOONDALUP |
$600.00 |
12 X $50 TARGET VOUCHERS FOR EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH AWARDS |
|
46632 |
12/07/2004 |
DUNCAN & CROSBIE GOLF WA |
$17,934.08 |
MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE COMMISSIONS JUNE 2004 |
|
46633 |
12/07/2004 |
JOONDALUP COURT |
$2,090.00 |
LEGAL FEES - ISSUE WARRANTS FOR RATING SERVICES |
|
46634 |
14/07/2004 |
WANNEROO NORTH PTY LTD |
$0.00 |
CHEQUE DELETED DUE TO PRINTER ERROR |
|
46635 |
14/07/2004 |
WANNEROO NORTH PTY LTD |
$217,980.55 |
BOND REFUND 13/07/2004 |
|
46636 |
14/07/2004 |
RATEPAYER |
$250.00 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46637 |
14/07/2004 |
CWE AND AM MARSHALL |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46638 |
14/07/2004 |
MR AM WRIGHT |
$60.00 |
REIMBURSEMENT OF LICENCE FEE FOR EATING HOUSE |
|
46639 |
14/07/2004 |
MARLENE FRISINA |
$10.00 |
REFUND OF GOLD PROGRAM CANCELLED |
|
46640 |
14/07/2004 |
A AND M SPARKS |
$286.55 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46641 |
14/07/2004 |
S M WATTS |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46642 |
14/07/2004 |
C M BYRNES |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46643 |
14/07/2004 |
K E J HOGG |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46644 |
14/07/2004 |
B C BALDACCHINO |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46645 |
14/07/2004 |
AMIR OSMANOVIC |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46646 |
14/07/2004 |
BM MARSDEN |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46647 |
14/07/2004 |
EA AND DW SMART |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46648 |
14/07/2004 |
KM HOGG |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46649 |
14/07/2004 |
BW AND CA MCPHERSON |
$208.40 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46650 |
14/07/2004 |
R NAYNA |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46651 |
14/07/2004 |
KM POLJAKOVIC |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46652 |
14/07/2004 |
TA STEVENS AND PA KING |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46653 |
14/07/2004 |
JENNIFER JONES |
$10.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46654 |
14/07/2004 |
LOUISE SUVALKO |
$7.50 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46655 |
14/07/2004 |
MEGAN HILL |
$7.50 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46656 |
14/07/2004 |
JODIE HASTE |
$38.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - STERILISED |
|
46657 |
14/07/2004 |
DECK NOMINEES PTY LTD |
$320.00 |
RATES REFUND P/N 194569 -OVERPAYMENT |
|
46658 |
14/07/2004 |
B & T SORRENTI |
$444.32 |
RATES REFUND P/N 200084 - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46659 |
14/07/2004 |
JM AND RF MORGAN |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46660 |
14/07/2004 |
SHARON MEARS |
$132.00 |
REFUND - CHILDREN UNAVAILABLE TO ATTEND SWIMMING LESSONS |
|
46661 |
14/07/2004 |
MR C ELIADIS |
$124.30 |
REIMBURSEMENT OF PLUMBING COSTS DUE TO DAMAGE - INSURANCE SERVICES |
|
46662 |
14/07/2004 |
AARON RONALD LYNN |
$298.15 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46663 |
14/07/2004 |
LAWRENCE BADEN WATSON |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46664 |
14/07/2004 |
LISA KAYE SWAIN |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46665 |
14/07/2004 |
RONALD G STANLEY |
$40.40 |
REFUND - CUSTOMER CHARGED INCORRECT AMOUNT FOR AQUAMOTION MEMBERSHIP |
|
46666 |
14/07/2004 |
AM HEARD & KM JORISSEN |
$31.11 |
RATES REFUND P/N 199941 - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46667 |
14/07/2004 |
KALAN ZOMER |
$57.10 |
RATES REFUND P/N 196540 |
|
46668 |
14/07/2004 |
AK AND NJ BRADLEY |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46669 |
14/07/2004 |
SJ MOLINO |
$249.15 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46670 |
14/07/2004 |
D AND RS BAKEWELL |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46671 |
14/07/2004 |
N DE BUEGER & T SOUTHERN |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46672 |
14/07/2004 |
WENDY ZELLER |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46673 |
14/07/2004 |
KAREN LLOYD |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46674 |
14/07/2004 |
KATHLEEN SMEULDERS |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46675 |
14/07/2004 |
MICHELLE HARRIS |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46676 |
14/07/2004 |
GREG PEARCE |
$5.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46677 |
14/07/2004 |
SUZANNE TAYLOR |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46678 |
14/07/2004 |
AVA DEMPSEY |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46679 |
14/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO |
$236.12 |
RATES PAYMENT |
|
46680 |
14/07/2004 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP |
$49.30 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46681 |
14/07/2004 |
ALINTA GAS |
$316.05 |
2 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46682 |
14/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$2,844.66 |
BULK MAIL SERVICE FEES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS MERCHANT FEES FOR RATING SERVICES |
|
46683 |
14/07/2004 |
BEATRIX RAUSCH |
$41.66 |
KEY HOLDER - PHIL RENKIN CENTRE & OLDHAM PARK |
|
46684 |
14/07/2004 |
BUILDERS REGISTRATION BOARD |
$11,980.50 |
COLLECTION AGENCY FEE - JUNE 2004 |
|
46685 |
14/07/2004 |
BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND |
$51,945.32 |
LEVY PAYMENT RECONCILIATION - JUNE 2004 |
|
46686 |
14/07/2004 |
CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY |
$836.65 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46687 |
14/07/2004 |
DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT |
$1,752.51 |
UNSPENT MEMBERSHIP GRANT FOR 03/04 - FINANCIAL COUNSELLING, WANNEROO YOUTH SERVICE, YANCHEP YOUTH SERVICE & YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
46688 |
14/07/2004 |
EASIFLEET MANAGEMENT |
$9,956.52 |
OPERATING LEASE VEHICLES – JUNE 2004 |
|
46689 |
14/07/2004 |
HOMESWEST RENTALS |
$554.66 |
RATES REFUND P/N 202642 - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46690 |
14/07/2004 |
SATTERLY WANNEROO PTY LTD |
$190.93 |
RATES REFUND P/N 205769 - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46691 |
14/07/2004 |
YOUTH RALLY TEAM PETTY CASH |
$156.39 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46692 |
14/07/2004 |
YOUTH SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$123.70 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46693 |
14/07/2004 |
WESTERN POWER |
$7,081.25 |
POWER SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS (INCLUDING STREET LIGHTING) |
|
46694 |
14/07/2004 |
DARLING RANGE ADVENTURE CAMP |
$495.00 |
15 X LOW ROPE COURSE FOR SCHOOL HOLIDAY PROGRAM |
|
46695 |
14/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN AIRCONDITIONING |
$173.31 |
AIRCONDITIONING MAINTENANCE MOWER STORES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
46696 |
14/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TURF INDUSTRIES |
$39,647.20 |
CONTRACT MAINTENANCE WORKS AT CARRAMAR & MARANGAROO GOLF COURSES - MAY 2004 |
|
46697 |
14/07/2004 |
BIKE FORCE |
$738.00 |
BIKE RACK - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
46698 |
14/07/2004 |
BIZIRCUS |
$300.00 |
BOOKING OF FIRE EATER/JUGGLER FOR 1 HOUR FOR ART AWARDS 3/05/04 |
|
46699 |
14/07/2004 |
BRIT MOVE |
$506.00 |
FURNITURE REMOVAL - WANNEROO YOUTH TO WANNEROO LIBRARY |
|
46700 |
14/07/2004 |
HERITAGE COUNCIL OF W A |
$385.00 |
HERTIAGE PLAN & MANGEMENT SEMINAR 2/07/04 - P ROGERS |
|
46701 |
14/07/2004 |
HOUSING INDUSTRY ASSOC |
$115.50 |
HIA TERMIMESH INDUSTRY OUTLOOK BREAKFAST 30/07/04 - C WILLIAMS, S NEALE AND A BELL |
|
46702 |
14/07/2004 |
INST OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AUST LTD |
$841.50 |
SYSTEMS PLUS SUBSCRIPTION - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46703 |
14/07/2004 |
LAWRENCE & HANSON |
$1,112.16 |
SAFETY ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
46704 |
14/07/2004 |
MERCURY FIRE SAFETY |
$159.50 |
REFILL & PRESSURE TEST EXTINGUISHERS AT GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
46705 |
14/07/2004 |
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL |
$12.00 |
RUBBISH REMOVAL AT QUINNS CARAVAN PARK |
|
46706 |
14/07/2004 |
NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF |
$31.85 |
LEGAL FEES - RATING SERVICES |
|
46707 |
14/07/2004 |
PERTH HOME CARE |
$414.60 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC CLIENTS |
|
46708 |
14/07/2004 |
SKATERS ON ICE |
$187.00 |
11 X SKATERS SCHOOL HOLIDAY PROGRAM |
|
46709 |
14/07/2004 |
SOUTHWEST TOURING CAR CLUB |
$390.00 |
ROUND 3 ENTRY FEES X 6 - YOUTH SERVICES RALLY TEAM |
|
46710 |
14/07/2004 |
STATEWIDE CLEANING SUPPLIES |
$760.06 |
CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
46711 |
14/07/2004 |
THE PRINTING FACTORY |
$759.39 |
10,000 BOOKMARKS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
46712 |
14/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
46713 |
14/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
46714 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR S SALPIETRO |
$1,125.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
46715 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR J STEWART |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
46716 |
19/07/2004 |
MR F CVITAN |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
46717 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR D NEWTON |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
46718 |
19/07/2004 |
MR A BLENCOWE |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
46719 |
19/07/2004 |
MR H WRANKMORE |
$70.00 |
VOLUNTEER PAYMENT |
|
46720 |
15/06/2004 |
MULTI VISION |
$5,841.00 |
SUPPLY OF NON CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL TREATMENT FOR QUINNS ROCKS KERBS/FOOTPATHS AND MINDARIE PARK |
|
46721 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$110.90 |
J98211 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FEES |
|
46722 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$110.90 |
J98107 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FEES |
|
46723 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$110.90 |
J98105 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FFES |
|
46724 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$110.90 |
J98887 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FEES |
|
46725 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$53.40 |
98338 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FEES |
|
46726 |
20/07/2004 |
DEPT FOR PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE |
$110.90 |
98886 VEHICLE EXAMINATION FEES |
|
46727 – 46749 |
21/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
CANCELLED DUE TO PRINTER ERROR |
|
46750 |
26/07/2004 |
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT & WATER |
$100.00 |
APP FOR A CLEARING PERMIT (AREA PERMIT) FEE FOR AREA BETWEEN 1HA AND 10HA HEPBURN AVENUE (MIRRABOOKA AVENUE TO THE AVENUE) ROAD RESERVE |
|
46751 |
28/07/2004 |
MJ PIWOWARCZYK |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46752 |
28/07/2004 |
NATIONAL SNRS - BALLAJURA |
$50.00 |
KEY BOND REFUND |
|
46753 |
28/07/2004 |
KATIE LEANNE MCLERNON |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46754 |
28/07/2004 |
T R ABSALOM |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46755 |
28/07/2004 |
A GRIFFITHS |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46756 |
28/07/2004 |
J & J STIPANICEV |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46757 |
28/07/2004 |
ESTATE OF G RICCIARDO DECEASED |
$1,023,162.35 |
COMPENSATION FOR LAND TAKEN FOR ROAD WIDENING AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING INTEREST) - TPS |
|
46758 |
28/07/2004 |
TOPSFIELD PTY LTD AND |
$43,431.00 |
REIMBURSEMENT OF DRAINAGE WORKS PERFORMED - TPS |
|
46759 |
28/07/2004 |
KEVIN BUTLER |
$16,500.00 |
COMPENSATION FOR ROAD WIDENING LAND - TPS |
|
46760 |
28/07/2004 |
YOUTH LINK |
$220.00 |
VARIOUS TRAINING SESSIONS AT YOUTH LINK FOR A PAGET-STEDMAN AND G HICKS - YOUTH SERVICES |
|
46761 |
28/07/2004 |
KE PERREAU & SP DE WIND |
$286.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46762 |
28/07/2004 |
DT POTTER |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46763 |
28/07/2004 |
K LAWTON |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46764 |
28/07/2004 |
T NEWMAN |
$15.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46765 |
28/07/2004 |
J HANNAFORD |
$38.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - STERLISED |
|
46766 |
28/07/2004 |
A SCARGILL |
$50.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46767 |
28/07/2004 |
R TAYLOR |
$50.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46768 |
28/07/2004 |
M TOPLISS |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46769 |
28/07/2004 |
J GREEN |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - DECEASED |
|
46770 |
28/07/2004 |
WA NETWORK CBHCS |
$830.00 |
WA NETWORK CONFERENCE 19 & 20/07/04 - M TEALE & L GRAHAME/ L DONG |
|
46772 |
28/07/2004 |
LOUIS JEAN-CLAUDE FIGON |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46773 |
21/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS ADULT DAY CARE PETTY CASH |
$132.05 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46774 |
21/07/2004 |
AMP FLEXIBLE LIFETIME SUPERANNUATION |
$1,615.38 |
PAYROLL DED: F/ENDING 02/07/04 & 16/7/04 |
|
46755 |
21/07/2004 |
BALLAJURA JUNIOR FOOTBALL |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46776 |
21/07/2004 |
CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE PETTY CASH |
$200.00 |
ESTABLISHMENT OF PETTY CASH |
|
46777 |
21/07/2004 |
CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$614.00 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46778 |
21/07/2004 |
HAINSWORTH COMMUNITY CENTRE PETTY CASH |
$89.55 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46779 |
21/07/2004 |
HONEYWELL SECONDHAND SHOP |
$225.00 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46780 |
21/07/2004 |
IINET TECHNOLOGIES |
$400.00 |
EXPLORER SERVICE FOR L MCNAMARA |
|
46781 |
21/07/2004 |
INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMIN |
$195.00 |
BREAKFAST SEMINAR EMERGING ISSUES IN HR MANAGEMENT 17/08/04 – J LOVE |
|
46782 |
21/07/2004 |
M HAYES |
$75.00 |
KEY HOLDER - WANNEROO ROAD MUSEUM & COCKMAN HOUSE |
|
46783 |
21/07/2004 |
ORANGE |
$551.07 |
PAGING SERVICES FOR RANGERS |
|
46784 |
21/07/2004 |
QUINNS ROCKS ADULT DAY CARE PETTY CASH |
$428.90 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46785 |
21/07/2004 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$47,700.25 |
WATER SUPPLIES TOVARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS |
|
46786 |
21/07/2004 |
ZURICH CLIENT SERVICE |
$470.76 |
46786 21/07/2004 PAYROLL DED: F/ENDING 02/07/04 & 16/07/04 |
|
46787 |
21/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - AQUAMOTION |
$460.23 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2004 |
|
46788 |
21/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - RATES |
$287.50 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2004 |
|
46789 |
21/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - SOCIAL |
$385.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2003 |
|
46790 |
21/07/2004 |
CITY OF WANNEROO - LIMITED |
$335.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2003 |
|
46791 |
21/07/2004 |
WESTERN POWER |
$64,243.80 |
TREE PRUNING NEAR POWER LINES 3 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE POWER SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS RELOCATE POLE NEERABUP & STREET LIGHTING UPGRADE |
|
46792 |
21/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$92.75 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46793 |
21/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIA POST |
$8,657.25 |
MAIL PREPARATION FOR JUNE 2004 |
|
46794 |
21/07/2004 |
GERANIUM & PEGARGONIUM SOCIETY |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46795 |
21/07/2004 |
JUST SPECTACLES - OCEAN KEYS |
$200.00 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46796 - 46817 |
21/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
CANCELLED DUE TO PRINTER ERROR |
|
46818 |
21/07/2004 |
DIANA CHASE |
$800.00 |
4 X HOURLY SESSIONS CHILDRENS BOOK WEEK - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
46819 |
21/07/2004 |
STRATEGIC CLAIMS SOLUTION |
$1,430.00 |
TWO RISK MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS FOR RANGER SERVICES 25/06/04 |
|
46820 |
21/07/2004 |
ROADWISE TRAFFIC CONTROL |
$15,433.00 |
TRAFFIC CONTROL AT VARIOUS SITES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46821 |
21/07/2004 |
WANNEROO ELECTRIC |
$2,138.40 |
ELECTRICAL WORKS SAFETY INSPECTION OF ALL DECORATIVE LAMPS |
|
46822 |
21/07/2004 |
MCGRATH HOMES |
$71.11 |
REFUND BUILDING APPLICATION FEE - OVERPAYMENT |
|
46823 |
21/07/2004 |
MURRAY ROBERT FALCONER |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46824 |
21/07/2004 |
JR AND JA NICHOL |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46825 |
21/07/2004 |
CJ AND MA GILTROW |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46826 |
21/07/2004 |
JG AND ML PASH |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46827 |
21/07/2004 |
MALCOLM RULE |
$200.00 |
REFUND BUILDING APPLICATION - WITHDRAWN |
|
46828 |
21/07/2004 |
WAYNE J SMITH |
$79.10 |
REFUND BUILDING APPLICATION - OVERPAID |
|
46829 |
21/07/2004 |
GF AND KG NANAVATI |
$300.00 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46830 |
21/07/2004 |
DELSTRAT PTY LTD |
$55.00 |
REFUND SEPTIC TANK APPLICATION REFUSED |
|
46831 |
21/07/2004 |
THE DEPT OF HOUSING & WORKS |
$1,568.91 |
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION WITHDRAWN |
|
46832 |
21/07/2004 |
AC & M LEONARD |
$252.50 |
VEHICLE CROSSING SUBSIDY |
|
46833 |
21/07/2004 |
DARYOSH BAGHERZADEH TENBAGH |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46834 |
21/07/2004 |
GREG WILLIAMS |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46835 |
21/07/2004 |
SUE EATON |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46836 |
21/07/2004 |
BEN SINAGARA |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46837 |
21/07/2004 |
DEBORAH INGHAM |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46838 |
21/07/2004 |
RACHEL DEFONTAINE |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46839 |
21/07/2004 |
KIDS PROMOTION |
$300.00 |
BOND REFUND |
|
46840 |
21/07/2004 |
T DUNN & G COUSINS |
$10.00 |
REFUND COURSE CANCELLED |
|
46841 |
21/07/2004 |
MARTYN TUCK |
$12.00 |
DOG REGISTRATION REFUND - MOVED INTERSTATE |
|
46863 |
28/07/2004 |
ROADWISE TRAFFIC CONTROL |
$3,525.50 |
TRAFFIC CONTROL AT VARIOUS SITES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46864 |
28/07/2004 |
WANNEROO ELECTRIC |
$5,749.13 |
ELECTRICAL WORKS AT VARIOUS SITES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
46865 |
28/07/2004 |
ABORIGINAL SENIORS GROUP |
$50.00 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46866 |
28/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS ADULT DAY CARE PETTY CASH |
$47.65 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46867 |
28/07/2004 |
ALINTA GAS |
$158.40 |
GAS SUPPLIES AT WANNEROO YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTRE 1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46868 |
28/07/2004 |
CORPORATE SERVICES PETTY |
$578.40 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46869 |
28/07/2004 |
ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD |
$935.00 |
DISPOSAL OF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION WASTE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46870 |
28/07/2004 |
MOBILE LIBRARY PETTY CASH |
$61.10 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46871 |
28/07/2004 |
PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUST |
$1,820.00 |
MEMBERSHIP FOR ALAN MILLARD |
|
46872 |
28/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR J STEWART |
$317.48 |
TRAVEL ALLOWANCE |
|
46873 |
28/07/2004 |
STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES PETTY CASH |
$136.65 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46874 |
28/07/2004 |
TRAILER PARTS PTY LTD |
$67.32 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46875 |
28/07/2004 |
WATER CORPORATION |
$3,687.95 |
WATER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS |
|
46876 |
28/07/2004 |
WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE PTY |
$1,683.00 |
PROFILER & SKIDSTEER AT OCEAN REEF ROAD - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46877 |
28/07/2004 |
YANCHEP COMMUNITY HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$60.65 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46879 |
28/07/2004 |
WESTERN POWER |
$26,889.45 |
POWER SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS 1 X RATE PAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
46880 |
28/07/2004 |
ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY HOUSE PETTY CASH |
$55.65 |
PETTY CASH |
|
46881 |
28/07/2004 |
MS P M YARRAN |
$240.00 |
CRAFT ACTIVITIES FOR NAIDOC WEEK - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
46882 |
28/07/2004 |
MR F W PENNY |
$1,000.00 |
NAIDOC WEEK EVENTS - ENTERTAINMENT |
|
46883 |
28/07/2004 |
PATANAL PTY LTD |
$56,207.10 |
INTERIM POS COMPENSATION - TPS |
|
46884 |
28/07/2004 |
CALVER NOMINEES P/L |
$656,155.06 |
INTERIM POS COMPENSATION - TPS |
|
46885 |
28/07/2004 |
N & C CROSARA |
$921,127.33 |
COMPENSATION FOR LAND TAKEN FOR ROAD RESERVE & POS INCLUDING INTEREST - TPS |
|
46886 |
28/07/2004 |
JUSTIN SONIA PTY LTD |
$106,392.75 |
INTERIM POS COMPENSATION - TPS |
|
46887 |
28/07/2004 |
TELSTRA - PLANT DAMAGES |
$351.34 |
DAMAGE TO TELSTRA PROPERTY - ANTHONY WARING PARK - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
46888 |
28/07/2004 |
ELECTEK |
$21,793.26 |
PROGRESS CLAIM - RIDGEWOOD OVAL LIGHTING |
|
46889 |
28/07/2004 |
FORCORP PTY LTD |
$1,155.00 |
12 VOLT DIRECTIONAL ARROW & STROBE LIGHT - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46890 |
28/07/2004 |
GEOFFS TREE SERVICE |
$1,639.00 |
VARIOUS WORKS FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
46891 |
28/07/2004 |
INSURANCE COMMISION OF WA |
$250.00 |
GOVT RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 8/07/04 - B ECKHART |
|
46892 |
28/07/2004 |
KLEENIT |
$8,855.00 |
ANTI GRAFITTI COATING TO BUS SHELTERS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46893 |
28/07/2004 |
MISA 2000 PTY LTD |
$3,469.40 |
REPAIR COMPACTOR BODY 97003 - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46894 |
28/07/2004 |
READYMIX HOLDINGS PTY LTD |
$453.20 |
CONCRETE DRAINAGE DELIVERED PRINDIVILLE DRIVE, WANGARA - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46895 |
28/07/2004 |
SCHIAVELLO WA PTY LTD |
$2,495.90 |
ALTER LAYOUT IN ARCHIVE AREA - CORPORATE RESOURCES |
|
46896 |
28/07/2004 |
SIGN A RAMA |
$297.00 |
REBUILD & REPAINT SIGN FRAME - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
46897 |
28/07/2004 |
SOLVER PAINTS |
$51.26 |
PAINT SUPPLIES FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
46898 |
28/07/2004 |
SWAN TAXIS COMPANY OPERATION |
$233.04 |
TAXI SERVICES FOR CACP CLIENTS |
|
46899 |
28/07/2004 |
TENANTS ADVICE SERVICE |
$59.00 |
TENANTS RIGHTS MANUAL - FINANCIAL COUNCELLORS |
|
46900 |
28/07/2004 |
THE PURSUITS GROUP |
$110.66 |
ABORIGINAL PROGRAM BUS DRIVER - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
46901 |
28/07/2004 |
WANNEROO AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY |
$126.50 |
VEHICLE BELT FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46902 |
28/07/2004 |
WANNEROO SMASH REPAIRS PTY LTD |
$925.00 |
FENCE/GATE REPAIR COSTS - INSURANCE SERVICES |
|
46903 |
28/07/2004 |
WASTE MASTER |
$4,790.50 |
EQUIPMENT FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
46904 |
28/07/2004 |
WOODHEAD INTERNATIONAL |
$1,210.00 |
CIVIC CENTRE REFURBISHMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
47030 |
25/07/2004 |
21ST CENTURY BUSINESS EQUIPMENT |
$3,513.40 |
CASH REGISTER & ACCESSORIES - WASTE SERVICES |
|
47031 |
25/07/2004 |
A & J SALAMONE |
$176.00 |
PLASTERERS SAND FOR OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47032 |
25/07/2004 |
ACTION LOCK SERVICE |
$226.50 |
SUPPLY ALUMINIUM GLASS DOOR LOCK - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47033 |
25/07/2004 |
ADASOUND |
$192.50 |
REPAIRS TO RADIO AT AQUAMOTION |
|
47034 |
25/07/2004 |
ADVANCED SPATIAL TECHNOLOGY |
$11,000.00 |
2 X AUTOCAD 2005 - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
47035 |
25/07/2004 |
ALLEN MOBILE PHONE SERVIC |
$726.00 |
REMOVAL & INSTALLATION OF HANDS FREE KITS IN VARIOUS VEHICLES |
|
47036 |
25/07/2004 |
ALLPET PRODUCTS |
$1,265.00 |
HYDROBATH UNHEATED - RANGER SERVICES |
|
47037 |
25/07/2004 |
ASPHALTECH PTY LTD |
$90.75 |
DELIVERY OF ASPHALT - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47038 |
25/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN AIRCONDITIONING |
$3,266.41 |
AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47039 |
25/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT ANALYTICAL |
$2,435.40 |
ANALYSIS FEES (WATER) - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47040 |
25/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY |
$1,200.00 |
FIRST AID COURSE FOR 12 EMPLOYEES |
|
47041 |
25/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TURF INDUSTRIES |
$42,023.20 |
MAINTENANCE AT MARANGAROO & CARRAMAR GOLF COURSES – JUNE 2004 |
|
47042 |
25/07/2004 |
BALCATTA VETERINARY HOSPITAL |
$61.00 |
EUTHANASIA OF 1 DOG - RANGER SERVICES |
|
47043 |
25/07/2004 |
BARCODE TECHNIQUES |
$657.80 |
OPTICON OPT6125 BARCODE SCANNER - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47044 |
25/07/2004 |
BEAUREPAIRES FOR TYRES |
$33,515.68 |
TYRE FITTING SERVICES - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47045 |
25/07/2004 |
BEE JAYS DOOR SERVICE |
$2,042.83 |
INSTALL CHAIN OPERATED ROLLER DOOR AT OLD WORKS DEPOT - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47046 |
25/07/2004 |
BENARA NURSERIES |
$15,438.50 |
VARIOUS PLANTS FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
47047 |
25/07/2004 |
BIG W |
$599.43 |
PS2 GAME FOR HAINSWORTH YOUTH CENTRE VARIOUS PURCHASES FOR YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM ACITIVITIES |
|
47048 |
25/07/2004 |
BOSCH REXROTH PTY LTD |
$969.10 |
REPAIR & TEST SUPERIOR PACK TRUCK - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47049 |
25/07/2004 |
BOYA EQUIPMENT |
$138.49 |
VARIOUS SUPPLIES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47050 |
25/07/2004 |
BOYNES SPRING |
$220.00 |
5" TRAMPOLINE SPRINGS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47051 |
25/07/2004 |
BRAVO HIRE |
$176.00 |
HIRE OF GROUND HOGS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47052 |
25/07/2004 |
BRUECHLE GILCHRIST & EVANS PTY LTD |
$7,797.90 |
JOONDALUP DRIVE DUAL CARRIAGEWAY PROGRESS CLAIM FOR SIDRA ANALYSIS - INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
47053 |
25/07/2004 |
BSD CONSULTANTS |
$6,270.00 |
REVIEW OF WASTE COLLECTION IN PERTH METRO AREA - WASTE SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
DESIGN OF ALEXANDER DR DUALCARRIAGEWAY - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
47054 |
25/07/2004 |
BT EQUIPMENT PTY LTD |
$551.16 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47055 |
25/07/2004 |
BUDGET PORTABLES |
$1,676.44 |
HIRE OF PORTABLE EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS OPERATIONAL SERVICES PROJECT SITES |
|
47056 |
25/07/2004 |
BULLIVANTS PTY LTD |
$1,675.08 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47057 |
25/07/2004 |
BUNNINGS PTY LTD |
$648.32 |
VARIOUS TOOLS & HARDWARE FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47058 |
25/07/2004 |
BURGTEC AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD |
$47.69 |
REPAIRS TO CHAIR IN RATING SERVICES |
|
47059 |
25/07/2004 |
C & EM HARMER |
$206.50 |
NEWSPAPER DELIVERIES |
|
47060 |
25/07/2004 |
CAMERALAND |
$623.95 |
DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSORIES - HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE |
|
47061 |
25/07/2004 |
CARRAMAR RESOUCES INDUSTRIES |
$986.64 |
VARIOUS SAND SUPPLIES FOR OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47062 |
25/07/2004 |
CASEWEST PTY LTD |
$1,080.30 |
REPAIR BRAKE FAULT FLEET #W31019 - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47063 |
25/07/2004 |
CCH AUSTRALIA LTD |
$905.00 |
AUST CONSUMER CREDIT LAW CD - FINANCIAL COUNSELLING |
|
47064 |
25/07/2004 |
CE NICHOLLS & SON PTY LTD |
$2,178.00 |
SWIMMING POOL INSPECTIONS - BUILDING APPROVALS |
|
47065 |
25/07/2004 |
CEAWA |
$462.28 |
KIT LOCK & SWITCH - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47066 |
25/07/2004 |
CENTRELINE MARKINGS |
$17,371.20 |
TREAT CERAMIC TILES ON PHIL'S PATH TWO ROCKS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES INSTALL TACTILE PAVING AT VARIOUS SITES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47067 |
25/07/2004 |
CHALLENGE BATTERIES WA |
$228.80 |
BATTERIES NS502 X 4 - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
47068 |
25/07/2004 |
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES |
$277.20 |
AMACSU COW/WORKPLACE RELATIONS AWARD BREACH J BARNDON/COW ALLEGED UNFAIR TERMINATION |
|
47069 |
25/07/2004 |
CITY OF JOONDALUP |
$22,014.61 |
HIRE OF CHERRY PICKER - OPERATIONAL SERVICES VARIOUS LICENCES & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47070 |
25/07/2004 |
COASTAL SERVICES |
$1,460.80 |
GAS & ELECTRICAL WORKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47071 |
25/07/2004 |
COATES HIRE OPERATIONS PTY LTD |
$965.01 |
PETROL GENERATOR - YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM ACITIVTIES HIRE OF BOBCAT - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47072 |
25/07/2004 |
COLLINS WHITFORD CITY |
$2,312.63 |
BOOK PURCHASES - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47073 |
25/07/2004 |
COMMUNIQUE COMMUNICATION |
$600.00 |
NOKIA'S 3315 & ACCESSORIES – I.T. SERVICES |
|
47074 |
25/07/2004 |
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS |
$21,453.23 |
ADVERTISING - JUNE 2004 |
|
47075 |
25/07/2004 |
COURIER AUSTRALIA |
$184.85 |
COURIER SERVICES - VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
|
47076 |
25/07/2004 |
CREATIVE TEACHING AIDS |
$628.69 |
BOOK PURCHASES - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47077 |
25/07/2004 |
CURTAIN MAN |
$1,177.00 |
INSTALL BLINDS AT WANNEROO YOUTH CENTRE |
|
47078 |
25/07/2004 |
D & M LAUNDRY SERVICE |
$633.44 |
LAUNDRY SERVICES |
|
47079 |
25/07/2004 |
DA INFORMATION SERVICES PTY LTD |
$8,835.90 |
BOOK PURCHASES/SUBSCRIPTIONS - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47080 |
25/07/2004 |
DADA RECORDS |
$210.00 |
RECORDS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47081 |
25/07/2004 |
DANIELS SHARPSMART AUSTRALIA |
$95.26 |
SUPPLY S22 S-SERIES SHARPS CONTAINERS - HEALTH SERVICES |
|
47082 |
25/07/2004 |
DEWSONS - MERRIWA |
$186.12 |
FOOD PURCHASES - QUINNS SKATE COMPETITION |
|
47083 |
25/07/2004 |
DIRECT ENGINEERING SERVICES |
$30,195.00 |
MANUFACTURE 6 X ALUMINIUM UTE CANOPYS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47084 |
25/07/2004 |
DIRECT NATIONAL BUSINESS |
$265.76 |
BUSINESS SUPPLIES FOR REPROGRAPHICS |
|
47085 |
25/07/2004 |
DME CONTRACTORS |
$9,900.00 |
SUPPLY & INSTALL TURF AT RIDGEWOOD OVAL |
|
47086 |
25/07/2004 |
DOMINO'S PIZZA AUSTRALIA |
$210.00 |
CATERING FOR SAFER CITIZENS COMMUNITY SAFETY EDUCATION SESSION |
|
47087 |
25/07/2004 |
DRIVE IN ELECTRICS |
$2,295.75 |
VARIOUS REPAIRS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47088 |
25/07/2004 |
DWIGHT COMMUNICATIONS |
$154.00 |
LOCATE SERVICES PRINDIVILLE DRIVE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47089 |
25/07/2004 |
DYMOCKS - HAY ST |
$215.00 |
GIFT CERTIFICATES FOR YANCHEP/TWO ROCKS & GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARIES |
|
47090 |
25/07/2004 |
E & MJ ROSHER |
$283.70 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47091 |
25/07/2004 |
EDGEWATER VETERINARY HOSPITAL |
$78.00 |
EUTHANASIA OF 4 DOGS - RANGER SERVICES |
|
47092 |
25/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
47093 |
25/07/2004 |
ELITE BADGES |
$71.23 |
NAME BADGES FOR RANGER SERVICES |
|
47094 |
25/07/2004 |
EMCAP AUSTRALIA |
$105.00 |
SUBSCRIPTION TO BARBIE MAGAZINE - LIARBARY SERVICES |
|
47095 |
25/07/2004 |
FOAM N CANVAS |
$27.50 |
CANVAS MARQUEE REPAIR - MARKETING SERVICES |
|
47096 |
25/07/2004 |
FORCORP PTY LTD |
$280.50 |
AMBER STROBE LIGHT - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47097 |
25/07/2004 |
FORTRON AUTO TREATMENTS |
$237.60 |
BRAKE CLEANER FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
47098 |
25/07/2004 |
GEOFFS TREE SERVICE |
$32,475.30 |
VARIOUS WORKS ON TREES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47099 |
25/07/2004 |
GLORIA R CNAPICH |
$90.00 |
MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT - ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
47100 |
25/07/2004 |
GM & J LOMBARDI PTY LTD |
$2,468.40 |
AXLE BEAM BRACKETS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47102 |
25/07/2004 |
GRAFFITI SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA |
$11,638.00 |
GRAFFITI REMOVAL AT VARIOUS SITES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47103 |
25/07/2004 |
GRAND TOYOTA DAIHATSU |
$91,885.60 |
NEW VEHICLE PURCHASES - WN32148, WN32141, WN315, WN314 NEWVEHICLE - 06/2004 TOYOTA HILUX VEHICLE REGISTRATION WN314 ($297.40) |
|
47104 |
25/07/2004 |
GRONBEK SECURITY |
$44.00 |
TWIN CLYINDER FOR GUMBLOSSOM COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
47105 |
25/07/2004 |
HALAS DENTAL LIMITED |
$105.01 |
ALGINATE FOR TWO ROCKS CHICZ BIZ PROGRAM ACITIVITIES |
|
47106 |
25/07/2004 |
HOME CHEF |
$1,378.33 |
HOME CHEF DINNERS JUNE 04 FOR HACC/CACP CLIENTS |
|
47107 |
25/07/2004 |
HOMEBUYERS CENTRE |
$30.00 |
BUILDING APPLICATION FEE - OVERPAID |
|
47108 |
25/07/2004 |
HUGALL & HOILE |
$21,984.66 |
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47109 |
25/07/2004 |
ICON OFFICE TECHNOLOGY |
$856.41 |
PHOTOCOPIER METER READING |
|
47110 |
25/07/2004 |
INSURANCE COMMISION OF WA |
$250.00 |
GOVERNMENT RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR 8/07/04 - P CALLEY |
|
47111 |
25/07/2004 |
INTERCITY OFFICE PARTITIONING |
$6,321.70 |
VARIOUS WORKS AT CITY FACILITIES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47112 |
25/07/2004 |
INTERPAVE |
$275.00 |
INSTALLATION OF LIMESTONE SURREY STREET, MARANGAROO - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47113 |
25/07/2004 |
JACKSONS DRAWING SUPPLIES |
$186.95 |
ART SUPPLIES FOR YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
|
47114 |
25/07/2004 |
JAMES BENNETT PTY LTD |
$81.91 |
BOOK PURCHASES - WANNEROO LIBRARY |
|
47115 |
25/07/2004 |
JAYS BUSINESS EQUIPMENT |
$278.19 |
ULTRUIM EDT LABEL – I.T. SERVICES |
|
47116 |
25/07/2004 |
JB HI FI GROUP PTY LTD |
$1,491.36 |
CD/DVD'S FOR MOBILE & GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARIES |
|
47117 |
25/07/2004 |
JB PRECISE ENGINEERING |
$3,311.00 |
MAKE/REPAIR VEHICLE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47118 |
25/07/2004 |
JCA WESTSIDE |
$71.50 |
LABOUR CHARGE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47119 |
25/07/2004 |
KERBING WEST |
$33,395.67 |
KERBING WORKS AT VARIOUS SITES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47120 |
25/07/2004 |
KLEENHEAT GAS PTY LTD |
$162.65 |
GAS CYLINDERS FOR QUINNS CARAVAN PARK - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY |
|
47121 |
25/07/2004 |
KMART JOONDALUP |
$401.96 |
PLAYSTATION ITEMS FOR CHILLOUT SESSIONS - YOUTH SERVICES BEAN BAG REFILLS FOR CHICZ BIZ PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
|
47122 |
25/07/2004 |
KOORONG |
$434.60 |
BOOK PURCHASES - GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
|
47123 |
25/07/2004 |
KOTT GUNNING LAWYERS |
$4,272.92 |
PROFESSIONAL CHARGES: QUINNS CAFÉ/RESTURANT - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY PROFESSIONAL CHARGES: STAFF INNOVATION AWARD SCHEME PROFESSIONAL CHARGES: CLARKSON LIBRARY TENANCIES |
|
47124 |
25/07/2004 |
LAWRENCE & HANSON |
$1,072.17 |
VARIOUS SAFETY ITEMS - DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
47125 |
25/07/2004 |
LILIANA STAFFORD |
$450.00 |
AUTHOR FOR BOOK WEEK - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47126 |
25/07/2004 |
LIMESTONE BUILDING BLOCKS |
$8,131.20 |
56 X PALLETS OF LIMESTONE BLOCKS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47127 |
25/07/2004 |
LINFOX ARMAGUARD |
$805.93 |
WAA 2 KEY SAFE/CASH COLLECTIONS - AQUAMOTION & CUSTOMER SERVICES |
|
47128 |
25/07/2004 |
LOUISE SCHOFIELD |
$450.00 |
AUTHOR FOR BOOK WEEK 04/05 - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47129 |
25/07/2004 |
MA HALL PLUMBING PTY LTD |
$394.00 |
SERVICE & REPAIRS TO OIL SEPARATOR & SKIMMER - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47130 |
25/07/2004 |
MACKAY URBAN DESIGN |
$3,960.00 |
URBAN DESIGN REVIEW OF WANNEROO TOWN CENTRE - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY |
|
47131 |
25/07/2004 |
MAGENTA |
$1,028.00 |
ARTISTS FEE FOR TWO ROCKS MURAL - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47132 |
25/07/2004 |
MAJOR MOTORS |
$60,374.39 |
EMERGENCY AIR HORN INSTALLATION - RANGER SERVICES NEW 2004 ISUZU NPR400 & REGISTRATION WN32064 ($57,124.40) HIRE OF ISUZU NPS300 TIPPER -FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47133 |
25/07/2004 |
MAKJAP PTY LTD |
$3,650.00 |
CONCRETE STAIRWAY OFF FORESHORE VISTA YANCHEP - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47134 |
25/07/2004 |
MS B MANNING |
$300.00 |
10 EXERCISE CLASSES FOR JUNE 2004 - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47135 |
25/07/2004 |
MERCURY FIRE SAFETY |
$1,706.65 |
VARIOUS SIGNS & SERVICES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47136 |
25/07/2004 |
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL |
$157,471.24 |
MRF, COMMERCIAL, GENERAL, BULK, RESERVE & SMALL ANIMAL DISPOSAL |
|
47137 |
25/07/2004 |
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT |
$5,599.00 |
RECREATION EQUIPMENT - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
47138 |
25/07/2004 |
MIRCO BROS PTY LTD |
$1,373.70 |
VARIOUS CHEMICALS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47139 |
25/07/2004 |
MISA 2000 PTY LTD |
$1,716.22 |
REPAIRS TO COMPACTOR BODY 97003 - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47140 |
25/07/2004 |
MOSSYS MINI EXCAVATIONS |
$8,514.00 |
RETIC CROSSINGS FOR MIRRABOOKA AVENUE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47141 |
25/07/2004 |
NATIONAL ASSOC FOR THE VISUAL ARTS |
$77.00 |
BOOK PURCHASE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CODE OF PRACTICE AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE KIT N COMPLETE SET |
|
47142 |
25/07/2004 |
NATURAL AREA MANAGEMENT & SERVICES |
$2,216.50 |
ENVIRONMENTAL WEED CONTROL AT KINSALE PARK, MINDARIE |
|
47143 |
25/07/2004 |
NON ORGANIC DISPOSALS |
$2,411.20 |
DISPOSAL OF RUBBLE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47144 |
25/07/2004 |
NORTHERN SUBURBS BAILIFF |
$49.50 |
LEGAL FEES FOR RATING SERVICES |
|
47145 |
25/07/2004 |
NS PROJECTS PTY LTD |
$11,632.50 |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT REVIEW - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY |
|
47146 |
25/07/2004 |
NUFORD WANNEROO |
$923.55 |
SERVICE & REPAIRS TO VARIOUS VEHICLES - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47147 |
25/07/2004 |
PACIFIC BRANDS APPAREL |
$305.10 |
STAFF UNIFORM ISSUE FOR OUTSIDE WORKERS |
|
47148 |
25/07/2004 |
PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY LTD |
$10,609.50 |
HIRE OF PROFILER FLYNN DRIVE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47149 |
25/07/2004 |
PAX BOOKS |
$305.20 |
BOOK PURCHASES -LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47150 |
25/07/2004 |
PERTH HOME CARE |
$648.00 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC CLIENTS |
|
47151 |
25/07/2004 |
PERTH STRIPES & SIGNS |
$330.00 |
PRINT YOUTH RALLY POSTERS - YOUTH SERVICES |
|
47152 |
25/07/2004 |
PERTH YMCA YOUTH SERVICES |
$13,167.00 |
YMCA MOBILE UNIT AT VARIOUS SITES - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47153 |
25/07/2004 |
PETER WOOD PTY LTD |
$5,091.90 |
CONSERVATION FENCING AT FISHERMANS HOLLOW, YANCHEP ERECTION OF PINE BOLLARDS AT KINGSWAY COMPLEX - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47154 |
25/07/2004 |
PICTON PRESS |
$8,486.50 |
LASER TEMPLATES & PRESENTATION FOLDERS - COMMUNITY SERVICES SMARTCLUBS NEWSLETTER - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT |
|
47155 |
25/07/2004 |
PRO TECH COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD |
$3,462.80 |
CABLING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES REPAIR FAULTS ALEXANDER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTRE – I.T. SERVICES |
|
47156 |
25/07/2004 |
PRODUCTIVE PLASTICS |
$440.00 |
4 X POLYCARBONATE WINDOWS TO S/S LOADERS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47157 |
25/07/2004 |
PROTECTOR ALSAFE |
$2,132.90 |
SAFETY EQUIPMENT FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK FIRE FIGHTERS BOOTS FOR RANGER SERVICES |
|
47158 |
25/07/2004 |
QUALCON LABORATORIES |
$490.20 |
LIMESTONE TESTING AT FLYNN DRIVE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47159 |
25/07/2004 |
RAECO |
$400.16 |
BOOKGUARDS - WANNEROO LIBRARY |
|
47160 |
25/07/2004 |
RAMPAGE DESIGN |
$1,072.50 |
REPAIR & RENOVATE SKATE RAMPS - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
47161 |
25/07/2004 |
RAY HANA'S PTY LTD |
$179.60 |
PANTS & T-SHIRTS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES YOUTH INITIATIVE SCHEME |
|
47162 |
25/07/2004 |
READYMIX HOLDINGS PTY LTD |
$465.47 |
DELIVERY OF CEMENT DRAINAGE ITEMS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47163 |
25/07/2004 |
REEKIE PROPERTY SERVICES |
$47,032.63 |
CLEANING OF CITY BUILDINGS – JUNE 2004 |
|
47164 |
25/07/2004 |
RENTCO - TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT |
$1,166.65 |
HIRE OF VOLVO/HYD TRUCK - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47165 |
25/07/2004 |
RENTOKIL INITIAL PTY LTD |
$1,113.75 |
PICK UP & DELIVERY OF SANITARY BINS |
|
47166 |
25/07/2004 |
ROADS 2000 PTY LTD |
$57,687.32 |
SUPPLY & LAY ASPHALT - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47167 |
25/07/2004 |
ROCLA QUARRY PRODUCTS |
$123.69 |
DELIVERY OF VARIOUS SAND PRODUCTS -OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47168 |
25/07/2004 |
ROSS'S HANDYMAN CENTRES |
$874.95 |
STEP LADDERS - RANGER SERVICES |
|
47169 |
25/07/2004 |
ROWE SCIENTIFIC |
$674.29 |
VARIOUS CHEMICALS -HEALTH SERVICES |
|
47170 |
25/07/2004 |
RUSSELL LANDSCAPING WA PTY LTD |
$41,089.02 |
FINAL RAKE OF MULCH WANNEROO ROAD - OPERATIONAL SERVICES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FOR MARCH, APRIL AND MAY RETENTION RELEASE FOR HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE |
|
47171 |
25/07/2004 |
MR R RUSSELL-BROWN |
$238.50 |
TAI CHI LESSONS 30/04-25/06/04 AT YANCHEP COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
47172 |
25/07/2004 |
SANAX ST ANDREWS PHARMACY |
$181.98 |
MEDICAL & FIRST AID SUPPLIES - HEALTH SERVICES |
|
47173 |
25/07/2004 |
SANDBLASTING SERVICES |
$704.00 |
SANDBLASTING OF 3 TOOL BOXES - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47174 |
25/07/2004 |
SIGN A RAMA |
$440.00 |
ROSTER SIGN - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47175 |
25/07/2004 |
SJW PODIATRY PTY LTD |
$1,821.88 |
PODIATRY SERVICES JUNE 2004 - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
47176 |
25/07/2004 |
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
47177 |
25/07/2004 |
SOLVER PAINTS |
$223.66 |
PAINT SUPPLIES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47178 |
25/07/2004 |
SPOTLIGHT STORES PTY LTD |
$313.86 |
CRAFT SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
|
47179 |
25/07/2004 |
ST ANDREWS SUPPORT SERVICES |
$614.90 |
DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE FOR HACC CLIENTS |
|
47180 |
25/07/2004 |
STANHOPE HOME NURSING SERVICES |
$109.73 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC CLIENTS |
|
47181 |
25/07/2004 |
STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN |
$229.90 |
WANNEROO LIBRARY LOST & DAMAGED BOOK COSTS |
|
47182 |
25/07/2004 |
MR G STONE |
$50.00 |
LAUGHTER YOGA DEMONSTRATION & WORKSHOP - JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
47183 |
25/07/2004 |
SUBWAY |
$83.00 |
SUBWAY PARTY PLATTERS FOR FAMILY DAY CARE SERVICES TRAINING SESSIONS |
|
47184 |
25/07/2004 |
SYME MARMION & CO |
$10,000.00 |
ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC ISSUES FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTH WEST CORRIDOR - RESPONSE TO DIALOGUE WITH CITY |
|
47185 |
25/07/2004 |
TECHNICAL IRRIGATION IMPORTS |
$1,617.33 |
REPAIR/SUPPLY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47186 |
25/07/2004 |
THE GOOD GUYS |
$120.00 |
CORDLESS PHONE - CLARKSON YOUTH CENTRE |
|
47187 |
25/07/2004 |
THE PRINTING FACTORY |
$796.54 |
BUSINESS CARDS FOR VARIOUS EMPLOYEES FACT SHEETS FOR APPROVAL SERVICES |
|
47188 |
25/07/2004 |
THE PURSUITS GROUP |
$3,195.77 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC/CACP CLIENTS TEMP STAFF FOR QUINNS ADULT DAY CENTRE BUS DRIVER FOR ABORIGINAL PROGRAM |
|
47189 |
25/07/2004 |
THE SPORTS SHOP |
$223.75 |
VARIOUS BOXING EQUIPMENT - YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
|
47190 |
25/07/2004 |
TOMS SHEETMETAL |
$1,023.00 |
PUMP COVER NOT POWDER COATED - FLEET MAINTENANCE TELEVISION CABINET - WANNEROO YOUTH CENTRE |
|
47191 |
25/07/2004 |
TOPLINE TROPHIES |
$30.00 |
NAME BADGE FOR STAFF MEMBERS |
|
47192 |
25/07/2004 |
TOTAL TORO |
$23,425.65 |
TORO GROUNDMASTER MOWER (INCLUDING INSPECTION & LICENCE FEES) |
|
47193 |
25/07/2004 |
TRANSAIR TWO WAY RADIO COMPANY |
$95.15 |
REPAIRS TO WATER DAMAGED RADIO - AQUAMOTION |
|
47194 |
25/07/2004 |
TRIPLE T CONTRACTING PTY LTD |
$20,510.60 |
RETENTION RELEASE - CONSTRUCTION OF BURT STREET PUMP STATION, STORMWATER DRAINAGE UPGRADES & SUMP MODIFICATIONS |
|
47195 |
25/07/2004 |
TURFMASTER PTY LTD |
$17,860.98 |
TOTAL WEED CONTROL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ISLANDS - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
47196 |
25/07/2004 |
VOLANTE SYSTEMS |
$54.95 |
COMPUTER LICENCE FOR I.T. SERVICES |
|
47197 |
25/07/2004 |
WA HINO SALES & SERVICE |
$19,198.63 |
NEW VEHICLE PURCHASE - HINO DUTRO TRUCK ($18,705.60) REGISTRATION FOR WN32182 HINO DUTRO TRUCK SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47198 |
25/07/2004 |
WACKER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD |
$28.93 |
SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47199 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO CARAVAN CENTRE & STEEL |
$4,348.30 |
STEEL FABRICATION SERVICES -BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
47200 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO DRY CLEANERS |
$33.00 |
DRYCLEAING OF FIRE SERVICE UNIFORMS |
|
47201 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO FUEL INJECTION |
$66.00 |
1 SOLENOID CASE - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47202 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO MITSUBISHI |
$136,355.58 |
NEW VEHICLES (MITSUBISHI) - WN32163, WN32164, WN32164, WN32181 WN32180, WN32162 |
|
47203 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO SMASH REPAIRS PTY LTD |
$660.10 |
INSURANCE REPAIRS TO WN32154 |
|
47204 |
25/07/2004 |
WANNEROO TOWING SERVICE |
$368.50 |
TOWING OF ABONDONED VEHICLES - RANGER SERVICES |
|
47205 |
25/07/2004 |
WASTE MASTER |
$70.00 |
TRAVEL CHARGE FOR DELIVERY OF SUPERIOR PAK TO CUMMINS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47206 |
25/07/2004 |
WATTLEUP TRACTORS |
$1,118.15 |
SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
47207 |
25/07/2004 |
WATTS & WOODHOUSE |
$4,467.37 |
SUB-LEASE - WA SPORTING CAR CLUB (WASCC) TO OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD - CONTRACTS AND PROPERTY TENANCY AGREEMENTS REVIEW - CONTRACTS & PROPERTY STREETSIDE ADVERTISING - OPERATIONAL SERVICES CHARITABLE PURPOSES RATE EXEMPTION - CORPORATE SERVICES |
|
47208 |
25/07/2004 |
WESTBOOKS |
$556.53 |
BOOK PURCHASES - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
47209 |
25/07/2004 |
WESTCARE INDUSTRIES |
$192.28 |
UNIFORM ISSUE FOR OUTSIDE EMPLOYEES |
|
47210 |
25/07/2004 |
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN LOCAL |
$15,931.02 |
JUNE MARKETFORCE ADVERTISING |
|
47211 |
25/07/2004 |
WESTON REMARKING SERVICES |
$1,826.00 |
ROADMARKING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47212 |
25/07/2004 |
WESTSIDE CONCRETE CONTRACTORS |
$11,645.75 |
VARIOUS WORKS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47213 |
25/07/2004 |
WHITFORDS RETRAVISION |
$34.95 |
FAN HEATER - JENOLAN WAY COMMUNITY CENTRE |
|
47214 |
25/07/2004 |
WOODHEAD INTERNATIONAL |
$16,038.00 |
CIVIC CENTRE REFURBISHMENT – INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
47215 |
25/07/2004 |
WORK CLOBBER |
$217.40 |
SAFETY BOOTS FOR J VAUGHAN & D BLAIR |
|
47216 |
25/07/2004 |
WORMALD FIRE SYSTEMS |
$793.65 |
ADAPTOR & NOZZLE FOR INSURANCE SERVICES |
|
47217 |
25/07/2004 |
WT PARTNERSHIP AUSTRALIA |
$1,320.00 |
CLARKSON LIBRARY QUANTITY SURVEYING SERVICES |
|
47218 |
25/07/2004 |
ZIPFORM |
$245.98 |
INTERIM RATE NOTICES - JUNE 2004 |
|
47219 |
|
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
47220 |
30/07/2004 |
ECLIPSE RESOURCES PTY LTD |
$1,540.00 |
DISPOSAL OF RUBBLE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
47221 |
25/07/2004 |
SKIPPER TRUCKS BELMONT |
$547,596.95 |
NEW ACCO TRUCK WN32173 ($252,918.60) NEW IVECO ACCO TRUCK WN31876 ($294,223.60) VEHICLE INSPECTION &WEIGHBRIDGE FEES FOR WN32173 |
|
|
|
SUB-TOTAL - ADVANCE ACCOUNT CHEQUES |
$5,502,397.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1118 |
12/07/2004 |
HBF INSURANCE |
$2,736.15 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
1.1242 |
12/07/2004 |
INTEGRATED GROUP LTD |
$31,551.76 |
CASUAL LABOUR FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
|
1.1529 |
12/07/2004 |
MARQUEE MAGIC |
$152.29 |
MARQUEE & EQUIPMENT - COMOMMUNITY GARDEN EVENT |
|
1.1715 |
12/07/2004 |
MS J MOYLE |
$217.83 |
REIMBURSEMENT FOR OPERATIONS FIELD STAFF CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE MEETING BBQ |
|
1.283 |
12/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE |
$199,481.41 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY99-01- 09/07/2004 |
|
1.349 |
12/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING |
$157.70 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
1.355 |
12/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN SERVICES UNION |
$1,403.11 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
1.3609 |
12/07/2004 |
LGRCEU |
$1,215.50 |
PAYROLL: PY01-01- 07/07/2004 |
|
1.3615 |
12/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR T ROBERTS |
$404.49 |
TRAVEL ALLOWANCE FOR APRIL, MAY & JUNE 2004 |
|
1.3634 |
12/07/2004 |
TELSTRA - MELBOURNE |
$73.93 |
1 X RATEPAYER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
1.3644 |
12/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE |
$2,660.00 |
PAYROLL: F/ENDING 09/07/2004 |
|
1.3669 |
12/07/2004 |
MR C E MARSHALL |
$116.75 |
REIMBURSEMENT - TELEPHONE SUBSIDY HOME LINE |
|
1.872 |
12/07/2004 |
MR G DIXON |
$916.02 |
REIMBURSEMENTS OF MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR GIRRAWHEEN LIBRARY |
|
1.897 |
12/07/2004 |
DUNCAN CROSBIE GOLF WA PTY LTD |
$18,978.75 |
COMMISSION FEES FOR CARAMARAR GOLF COURSE - JUNE 2004 |
|
2.1347 |
13/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR J KELLY |
$5,763.88 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
3.3635 |
13/07/2004 |
DOWNUNDER SUBMERSIBLE MOTOR PTY LTD |
$52,356.30 |
4 X PUMPS AND PERMIGLASS - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
4.112 |
13/07/2004 |
AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD |
$219.96 |
GAS CYLINDERS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
4.3606 |
13/07/2004 |
HIF |
$268.65 |
PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 13/07/2004 |
|
4.365 |
13/07/2004 |
MR J MONDLANE |
$140.00 |
FITNESS/BOXING INSTRUCTION FOR YOUTH SERVICES AT HAINSWORTH LEISURE CENTRE |
|
4.748 |
13/07/2004 |
CUSTOM ENGINEERING |
$209.00 |
CHECK CAB LIFT RAM ON WASTE TRUCK - FLEET MIANTENANCE |
|
5.135 |
15/07/2004 |
ALINE CIVIL DRAFTING |
$4,180.00 |
CRASH INVESTIGATION & BLACK SPOT FUNDING APPLICATIONS - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
5.1536 |
15/07/2004 |
MR I MARTINUS |
$1,577.23 |
PAYROLL: OR HRS PAYMENT 16/07/2004 |
|
5.3707 |
15/07/2004 |
CITY SOFTWARE |
$460.00 |
QUALITY ASSURANCE SOFTWARE - WASTE SERVICES |
|
5.639 |
15/07/2004 |
CIVICA PTY LTD |
$105,996.00 |
CLIENT SERVER TOOLS & ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FEES - CORPORATE SERVICES AUTHORITY ENTERPRISE LICENCE - CORPORATE SERVICES |
|
6.1451 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR T LOFTUS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.1686 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR G MONKS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.2027 |
19/07/2004 |
MR M PEARSON |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3022 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR B TREBY |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3615 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR T ROBERTS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3616 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR I GOODENOUGH |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3617 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR J HUGHES |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3641 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR L MCNAMARA |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
6.3642 |
19/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR R STEFFENS |
$500.00 |
MONTHLY ALLOWANCE |
|
7.1477 |
19/07/2004 |
MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENGINE |
$5,009.60 |
SERVICE VEHICLE 96709 - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
7.2711 |
19/07/2004 |
STAMFORDS ADVISORS & CONSULTANTS |
$3,080.00 |
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAY 2004 - FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
7.339 |
19/07/2004 |
WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD |
$199,650.00 |
NEW CATERPILLAR GRADER - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
7.369 |
19/07/2004 |
KLEENING ZONE PTY LTD |
$70.00 |
TRUCK SPECIAL WASH - WASTE SERVICES |
|
7.753 |
19/07/2004 |
CUSTOM SERVICE LEASING LTD |
$1,389.87 |
LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET LEASING - FLEET SERVICES |
|
8.3635 |
21/07/2004 |
DOWNUNDER SUBMERSIBLE MOTOR PTY LTD |
$5,170.63 |
PUMP & SHROUD FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
9.1118 |
23/07/2004 |
HBF INSURANCE |
$2,347.85 |
PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 23/07/2004 |
|
9.283 |
23/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE |
$919.44 |
PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 23/07/2005 |
|
9.3226 |
23/07/2004 |
WANNEROO DAIRY SUPPLIES |
$893.95 |
MILK SUPPLIES FOR CITY |
|
9.349 |
23/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING |
$157.70 |
PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 23/07/2004 PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 21/07/2004 |
|
9.355 |
23/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN SERVICES UNION |
$1,217.11 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2004 |
|
9.3609 |
23/07/2004 |
LGRCEU |
$1,229.80 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2004 |
|
10.389 |
23/07/2004 |
BADGE CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD |
$138,717.15 |
PROGRESS CLAIM 6 - CONSTRUCTION OF CLARKSON LIBRARY |
|
11.1975 |
23/07/2004 |
PALACE HOMES & CONSTRUCTION |
$43,927.99 |
RETENTION RELEASE UNDERPAID ON EFT 50002038 ($1,864.74) REFUBISHMENT & ADDITIONS TO MARGARET COCKMAN PAVILION ($41,416.45) MARANGAROO GOLF COURSE - ADDITIONAL WORKS ($646.80) |
|
11.2659 |
23/07/2004 |
SOUTHDOWN CONSTRUCTION |
$366,311.28 |
DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 211 QUINNS ROAD, MINDARIE - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
11.3606 |
23/07/2004 |
HIF |
$268.65 |
PAYROLL: DED F/ENDING 23/07/2004 |
|
11.3705 |
23/07/2004 |
YEN MEDIA INTERNATION PTY |
$40.00 |
YEN MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
11.985 |
23/07/2004 |
FESA |
$9,756.23 |
EMERGENCY SERVICES LEVY –JUNE 2004 |
|
12.1242 |
23/07/2004 |
INTEGRATED GROUP LTD |
$3,935.09 |
CASUAL LABOUR FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
|
13.283 |
24/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE |
$190,311.00 |
PAYROLL: PY01-02- 21/07/2004 PAYROLL: PY99-02- 23/07/2004 |
|
13.3634 |
24/07/2004 |
TELSTRA - MELBOURNE |
$20,431.63 |
TELEPHONE CHARGES FOR CITY |
|
13.3642 |
24/07/2004 |
COUNCILLOR R STEFFENS |
$2,006.87 |
RATES REFUND P/N126238 - OVERPAYMENT |
|
13.3732 |
24/07/2004 |
MR C P WILLIAMS |
$77.00 |
REIMBURSEMENT - LUNCHEON FOR STAFF RECOGNITION |
|
13.3733 |
24/07/2004 |
MR M R COLE |
$220.35 |
REIMBURSEMENT - BREAKFAST OF CHAMPIONS - MODULE CHAMPIONS RECOGNITION – CORPORATE SERVICES |
|
14.1032 |
27/07/2004 |
FUCHS LUBRICANTS PTY LTD |
$1,885.54 |
GREASE GUN & LUBRICANTS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
14.1033 |
27/07/2004 |
FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY |
$3,022.49 |
COPIER CHARGES & RENTAL FOR REPROGRAPHICS & PLANNING |
|
14.112 |
27/07/2004 |
AIR LIQUIDE WA PTY LTD |
$426.43 |
GAS CYLINDERS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
14.1128 |
27/07/2004 |
HEAVY AUTOMATICS |
$6,249.34 |
VEHICLE PARTS AND REPAIRS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1169 |
27/07/2004 |
HOSEMASTERS |
$1,733.49 |
SUPPLY/REPLACE HOSES/FITTINGS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1432 |
27/07/2004 |
LIFTRITE TOYOTA |
$184.70 |
VARIOUS FILTER PURCHASES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1437 |
27/07/2004 |
LINCOLNE SCOTT |
$9,061.15 |
MS DRAWING UPDATE - BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT DEPOT WATER CONSUMPTION - BUILDING MAINTENANCE AQUAMOTION SUPPLEMENTARY A/C UNIT - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1458 |
27/07/2004 |
LULLFITZ |
$22,550.88 |
VARIOUS TUBS STOCK - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
14.1477 |
27/07/2004 |
MACDONALD JOHNSTON ENGINEERING |
$5,815.59 |
VARIOUS SPARE PARTS -FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.153 |
27/07/2004 |
ALLIGHT PTY LTD |
$409.20 |
SIX MONTLY SERVICE BACKUP GENERATORS AT DEPOT & CIVIC CENTRE |
|
14.1548 |
27/07/2004 |
MAXWELL ROBINSON & PHELPS |
$287.00 |
TREATMENT PORTUGUESE MILLIPEDES 25 DEMBRIDGE LOOP, HOCKING - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
14.156 |
27/07/2004 |
MAYDAY EARTHMOVING |
$45,928.30 |
EARTHMOVING EQUIPMENT, MULTI ROLLER, TRUCK, MINI EXCAVATOR - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.1587 |
27/07/2004 |
MEMO COMMUNICATIONS |
$41,630.35 |
TWO-WAY RADIO MAINTENANCE 1/07/04 – 30/06/05 DEINSTALL & REINSTALL VARIOUS TWO-WAY RADIOS - FLEET SERVICES |
|
14.1614 |
27/07/2004 |
MEY EQUIPMENT |
$567.60 |
FIT NEW BLADES TO MOWER - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1691 |
27/07/2004 |
MOORE BUSINESS SYSTEMS |
$509.85 |
PAYSLIPS FOR PAYROLL |
|
14.170 |
27/07/2004 |
ALTUS TRAFFIC |
$649.00 |
TRAFFIC CONTROL WANNEROO ROAD - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.1773 |
27/07/2004 |
NEBA INTERNATIONAL COURIERS |
$18.15 |
COURIER SERVICES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1774 |
27/07/2004 |
NEC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PTY LTD |
$2,035.29 |
RENEWAL OF NECARE SERVICE AGREEMENT – I.T. SERVICES |
|
14.179 |
27/07/2004 |
AMCAP DISTRIBUTION CENTRE |
$2,581.29 |
SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1846 |
27/07/2004 |
NORTHERN DISTRICTS PEST CONTROL |
$1,320.00 |
PEST TREATMENT/MANAGEMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
14.1917 |
27/07/2004 |
ONESTEEL DISTRIBUTION |
$88.00 |
SPARE PARTS FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.2044 |
27/07/2004 |
PERLEX HOLDINGS |
$760.00 |
HIRE SUMO WRESTLING SUITS & BOUNCY CASTLE - WANNEROO YOUTH CENTRE OPEN DAY |
|
14.214 |
27/07/2004 |
PLAYMAKER SPORTS |
$660.00 |
REPAIRS AT KINGSWAY NETBALL CENTRE - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.2184 |
27/07/2004 |
PRESTIGE ALARMS |
$10,272.30 |
ALARM SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
14.229 |
27/07/2004 |
ARBOR VITAE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE |
$46,736.25 |
YANCHEP SLSC CLAIM FOR 50% COMPLETION WANNEROO SHOWGROUNDS 50% COMPLETION STREET MASTER PLAN - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES YANCHEP SLSC DOLA CADASTRAL INFORMATION – LEISURE SERVICES |
|
14.2316 |
27/07/2004 |
RECLAIM INDUSTRIES LTD |
$10,780.00 |
560 X 25KG BAGS CROWN 111 - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.2322 |
27/07/2004 |
RECYCLING COMPANY OF WA PTY LTD |
$104,903.76 |
BADGERUP PROCESSING FEES -WASTE SERVICES |
|
14.2328 |
27/07/2004 |
RED HOT PARCEL TAXI |
$359.80 |
PARCEL SERVICE FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.239 |
27/07/2004 |
ARRB TRANSPORT RESEARCH LTD |
$297.00 |
RURAL ROAD & URBAN ROAD DESIGN - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
14.2408 |
27/07/2004 |
ROMARK CONSULTING PTY LTD |
$3,520.00 |
UPDATE ROMARK SYSTEM - EXECUTIVE SERVICES |
|
14.2413 |
27/07/2004 |
ROSIE O |
$495.00 |
FACE PAINTING COMMUNITY GARDEN FERRAR RESERVE - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
14.2505 |
27/07/2004 |
SCOTT PRINT |
$2,574.00 |
CUSTOMER CARE BOOKLETS - STRATEGIC & EXECUTIVE SERVICES |
|
14.2506 |
27/07/2004 |
SCOTTISH PACIFIC BUSINESS |
$462.00 |
ADVANCED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT - WORKSITE ASSESSMENT – A TODOROVIC |
|
14.2514 |
27/07/2004 |
SEALANES |
$978.64 |
VARIOUS ITEMS FOR STAFF & ELECTED MEMBERS |
|
14.2711 |
27/07/2004 |
STAMFORDS ADVISORS & CONSULTANTS |
$3,080.00 |
AUDIT OF REVENUE FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
14.2808 |
27/07/2004 |
SUSSEX INDUSTRIES |
$233.64 |
VARIOUS ITEMS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
14.2885 |
27/07/2004 |
THE CARERS |
$17,565.04 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC/CACP CLIENTS |
|
14.2967 |
27/07/2004 |
TOLL TRANSPORT PTY LTD |
$867.51 |
COURIER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
|
14.302 |
|
CANCELLED |
$0.00 |
|
|
14.317 |
27/07/2004 |
AUSTRALIAN LABORATORY SERVICES |
$165.00 |
OIL SAMPLE PUMPS - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.3242 |
27/07/2004 |
WANNEROO HARDWARE |
$433.56 |
HARDWARE SUPPLIES FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS |
|
14.3262 |
27/07/2004 |
WANNEROO PLUMBING |
$3,915.47 |
PLUMBING SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE |
|
14.339 |
27/07/2004 |
WESTRAC EQUIPMENT PTY LTD |
$107.17 |
SOLAR TRAFFIC ARROW BOARD HIRE - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
14.3404 |
27/07/2004 |
WHITE OAK HOME CARE SERVICES |
$1,298.18 |
PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR HACC/CACP CLIENTS |
|
14.3472 |
27/07/2004 |
WORLDWIDE ONLINE PRINTING |
$4,254.05 |
50 SCHOOL PROGRAMS - LIBRARY SERVICES FREE MULCH CARDS AND TIPPING VOUCHERS - WASTE SERVICES 19 OLYMPIC POSTERS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
14.3614 |
27/07/2004 |
PAUL'S PHOTOGRAPHIC PRESENTATIONS |
$175.00 |
PHOTOGRAPHIC COVERAGE - MAYOR J KELLY ONSITE - THE GROVE ESTATE |
|
14.3686 |
27/07/2004 |
EVENTS INDUSTRY ASSOC |
$350.00 |
RENEWAL GOLD MEMBERSHIP - CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP ORDERED BY ROSS RAYSON |
|
14.3695 |
27/07/2004 |
ESSENTIAL OFFICE PRODUCTS |
$1,710.50 |
DOCUBIND MACHINE - REPROGRAPHICS |
|
14.3699 |
27/07/2004 |
GHEMS HOLDING PTY LTD |
$1,783.06 |
VARIOUS PLANTS FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
14.3716 |
27/07/2004 |
THE AUSTRALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT |
$825.00 |
ADVERTISING FOR PROJECT MANAGER - CORPORATE RESOURCES |
|
14.3719 |
27/07/2004 |
CY O,CONNOR OF TAFE |
$2,817.50 |
MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COURSE - SEMESTER 1/2 2004 ENROLMENT FEES FOR VARIOUS STAFF MEMBERS - RANGER SERVICES |
|
14.379 |
27/07/2004 |
AVIS |
$112.64 |
HIRE OF BUS FOR DAY CARE CLIENTS - COMMUNITY SERVICES |
|
14.440 |
27/07/2004 |
BENTLEY SYSTEMS SOFTWARE |
$7,364.50 |
MX ANNUAL LICENCE & SUBSCRIPTION - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
14.479 |
27/07/2004 |
BOLINDA PUBLISHING PTY LTD |
$175.11 |
BOOKS FOR BOOKS ON WHEELS - LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
14.488 |
27/07/2004 |
BORAL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS |
$5,366.68 |
CEMENT DELIVERED TO VARIOUS OPERATIONAL SERVICES PROJECT SITES |
|
14.497 |
27/07/2004 |
BP AUSTRALIA LTD |
$123,830.13 |
FUEL ISSUES FOR FLEET CONTROL MAINTENANCE |
|
14.507 |
27/07/2004 |
BRING COURIERS |
$49.08 |
COURIER SERVICES FOR HEALTH SERVICES |
|
14.577 |
27/07/2004 |
CASTLEDEX BUSINESS SYSTEM |
$470.00 |
3 IN 1 CLIPS FOR RECORD SERVICES |
|
14.646 |
27/07/2004 |
CLEAN SWEEP |
$165.00 |
SWEEPING OF KINGSWAY NETBALL COURTS FOR OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.709 |
27/07/2004 |
CORPORATE EXPRESS |
$18,475.33 |
STATIONERY SUPPLIES - JUNE 2004 |
|
14.716 |
27/07/2004 |
COVENTRYS |
$2,474.92 |
AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.797 |
27/07/2004 |
DE NEEFE SIGNS PTY LTD |
$5,375.92 |
SIGNS FOR MOBILE LIBRARY VARIOUS SIGNS AND ACCESSORIES - OPERATIONAL SERVICES HAND RAILS FOR DEPOT STORE STOCK |
|
14.800 |
27/07/2004 |
NICK DEL BORRELLO |
$2,688.10 |
CONTRACTOR FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
14.809 |
27/07/2004 |
DELTA PROTECTIVE SERVICES |
$369.60 |
3 CROWD CONTROLLERS FOR UNDERAGE DANCE AT KOONDOOLA HALL |
|
14.904 |
27/07/2004 |
DYNAMIC GRAPHICS PTY LTD |
$314.50 |
THE CREATIVE SYMBOL COLLECTION - MARKETING DEPARTMENT |
|
14.907 |
27/07/2004 |
DIDASKO SOLUTIONS PTY LTD |
$330.00 |
2 X AP1000 POWER SUPPLIES FOR I.T. SERVICES |
|
14.938 |
27/07/2004 |
ELLIOTTS IRRIGATION PTY LTD |
$16.68 |
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT FOR OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
14.985 |
27/07/2004 |
FESA |
$197.00 |
RECOUP VOLUNTEER BFB PO BOX - RANGER SERVICES |
|
15.1117 |
28/07/2004 |
HAYS PERSONNEL SERVICES |
$1,441.44 |
CONTRACTOR HELEN TAYLFORTH - PLANNING SERVICES |
|
15.2686 |
28/07/2004 |
SPORTS TURF TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD |
$4,191.78 |
NUTRIENT PROJECT FERTILISER - PARKS DEPARTMENT |
|
15.2714 |
28/07/2004 |
STAMPALIA CONTRACTORS |
$115,958.15 |
HIRE OF WATER TRUCK, BOBCAT, COMPACTOR AND LOADER - OPERATIONAL SERVICES |
|
15.379 |
28/07/2004 |
AVIS |
$382.31 |
HIRE OF 22 SEAT BUS FOR QUINNS DAY CENTRE |
|
15.440 |
28/07/2004 |
BENTLEY SYSTEMS SOFTWARE |
$7,084.00 |
MXSUBDIV SELECT & MXROAD SUBSCRIPTION - INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES |
|
15.866 |
28/07/2004 |
DIRECT ENGINEERING SERVICES |
$499.95 |
REPAIR ALUMINIUM UTE CANOPY - FLEET MAINTENANCE |
|
|
|
SUB TOTAL - ADVANCE ACCOUNT EFT PAYMENTS |
$2,099,541.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNT |
$7,601,939.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES |
|||||
000003 |
|
BERKLEY ROAD |
$1,456,398.64 |
000003 |
|
|
|
|
|
LAND COMP FOR POS & RD RESERVE |
|
|
|
|
|
LAND COMP FOR POS |
|
000011 |
|
CELL 7 |
$75,000.00 |
000011 |
|
|
|
|
|
2ND INSTAL LOT 3 GNANGARA RD |
|
000017 |
|
CELL 6 |
$911,350.91 |
000017 |
|
|
|
|
|
MC LEODS - AMEND INFRASTRUCTURE COSETS TPS |
|
|
|
|
|
2ND INSTAL LOT 3 GNANGARA ROAD |
|
|
|
|
|
INTERIM POS COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION FOR RD WIDENING LAND |
|
000012 |
|
CELL 5 |
$487,891.04 |
000012 |
|
|
|
|
|
LAND COMP FOR POS |
|
|
|
|
|
LAND COMP FOR POS & RD RESERVE |
|
000010 |
|
CELL 3 |
$43,431.00 |
000010 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOPSFIELD PTY LTD - REIMBURSEMENT OF DRAINAGE WORKS |
|
|
|
SUB-TOTAL TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES |
$2,974,071.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO - MUNICIPAL ACCOUNT |
|||||
|
|
TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNT PAYMENTS |
$7,601,939.16 |
|
|
|
|
LESS – RECOUPED FROM TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES |
$2,974,071.59 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ADVANCE RECOUP |
$4,627,867.57 |
|
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S/0100V01
File Name: AINVESTMENT POLICY.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Bruce Perryman Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Manager Finance
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the City’s Investment Policy.
Background
The Investment Policy provides guidelines for the investment of the City’s funds that are surplus to immediate requirements. The policy requires a review, at least annually, with regard to its suitability and legislative compliance.
Detail
A copy of the current policy is attached (Attachment 1 refers) and no changes to the policy are proposed.
The City’s 2003/04 investment activity has been reviewed in accordance with the Policy. In particular it is noted that:-
1. All surplus funds have been invested in Managed Funds recommended by Grove Financial Services with each fund having a credit rating at or above the City’s Investment Policy requirements;
2. With regard to Trust Funds, a report has been presented to Council recommending the investment of Trust Funds with the Bendigo Bank. The Bendigo Bank has a BBB Standard and Poors Rating and therefore falls outside the City’s Policy, but it is considered to provide adequate security and allows the City to demonstrate its support for community banking;
3. All funds are invested with a term to maturity ranging from ‘at call’ to six (6) months;
4. The investment with any one managed fund is within the maximum percentage allowed under the policy; and
5. A summary of the investment portfolio is presented to Council on a monthly basis, showing the total funds invested, the amount invested with each managed fund and a comparison of exposure to each institution within the limits set by the policy.
Consultation
The City retains the services of Grove Financial Services for advice on the investment of surplus funds. The City receives regular updates and monthly portfolio performance reports in addition to more detailed six (6) monthly reports. An extract from the six (6) month report for the period ended 30 June 2004 is attached (Attachment 2 refers).
Comment
Administration considers that the current Investment Policy meets the requirements of the City with the primary objective of maximising investment returns within agreed risk parameters. Accordingly, there are no changes recommended to the Investment Policy.
With regard to the current portfolio, Grove Financial Services has recommended the switching of $5.0 million from the Macquarie Diversified Treasury Fund to the Macquarie Income Plus Fund. The Macquarie Income Plus Fund is expected to generate returns in excess of the Macquarie Diversified Treasury Fund. As an alternative, the Administration proposes to invest up to $5.0 million (the amount recommended by Grove) of its 2004/05 rate income as it is received.
Statutory Compliance
Goal 4 Corporate Management and Development – the proper management of our financial resources.
The objective of the City’s Investment Policy is to manage the City’s investment portfolio in order to maximise returns within agreed risk parameters.
Strategic Implications
The City’s Investment Policy adheres to Section 6.14 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Section 18(1) of the Trustees Act 1962.
Section 6.14 of the Local Government Act 1995 states:-
“1) Subject to the regulations, money held in the municipal fund or the trust fund of a local government that is not, for the time being, required by the local government for any other purpose may be invested ¾
(a) in accordance with Part III of the Trustees Act 1962; or
(b) in an investment approved by the Minister on the advice and recommendation of the Treasurer.
(2) Regulations in relation to investments by local governments may ¾
(a) provide for the manner in which an approval under subsection (1)(b) may be sought;
(b) prescribe classes of investment which may be made without the need to comply with subsection (1)(b);
(c) prescribe circumstances in which a local government is required to invest money held by it;
(d) provide for the application of investment earnings; and
(e) generally provide for the management of those investments.”
Section 18(1) of the Trustees Act 1962 states:-
“(1) Subject to the instrument creating the trust, a trustee shall, in exercising a power of investment ¾
(a) if the trustee's profession, business or employment is or includes acting as a trustee or investing money on behalf of other persons, exercise the care, diligence and skill that a prudent person engaged in that profession, business or employment would exercise in managing the affairs of other persons; or
(b) if the trustee is not engaged in such a profession, business or employment, exercise the care, diligence and skill that a prudent person would exercise in managing the affairs of other persons.”
Policy Implications
This review of Policy Number 5.1.2 recommends that no changes be made.
Financial Implications
The City’s Investment Policy assists the City to gain solid returns on its investments with minimum risk.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Officer/Policy & Local Laws Committee Recommendation: 17/08/2004
That Council:-
1. NOTES the annual review of the Investment Policy for suitability and compliance; and
2. ENDORSES the existing Investment Policy Number 5.1.2 without amendment.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 1 of 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 2 of 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 3 of 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 4 of 4
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 3 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 4 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 5 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 6 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 7 of 7
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P22/0418V01
File Name: CAProposed Lease EPA Quinns AQMS .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by bruce perryman Date 18 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by A Binnie Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by John Paton Date 06 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by John Paton Date 06 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Property Officer
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider leasing to the Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia (EPA), via a Land Lease, a portion of Quinns Lot 211 being an area of approximately 144m², for the purpose of operating an Air Quality Monitoring Station, for a Term of 10 years.
Background
The Quinns Rocks Air Quality Monitoring Station (AQMS) was established in 1992 as part of the Perth Photochemical Smog Study. Although the monitoring phase of the study was completed in 1995, the EPA’s findings were such that the station was considered an important component of the monitoring network across the Perth metropolitan area, particularly for ground level ozone measurement, and hence was kept in operation. The facility consists of a transportable shed, with a 10 metre high meteorological mast and surrounded by a 12m x 12m compound fence, with access to Quinns Road. No formal lease arrangement has ever been entered into with the EPA over this facility.
In November 2002, as a result of the City’s proposed redevelopment of Lot 211 including a Café and Essential Services building, negotiations commenced with officers from EPA to have the AQMS removed/relocated. At that point EPA advised that an Air Quality Management Plan had been implemented and the Quinns site provided objective data vital to the success of that plan. They indicated that the facility was still required in the future and, if possible, that it should be located as close as possible to its then current location (within the boundaries of Lot 211).
Several discussions and onsite meetings occurred between City and EPA officers to identify a suitable location for the leased site, with the best location for air quality monitoring in this case being an elevated position in proximity to clean air direct from the ocean. This needed to be balanced with the City’s requirements in respect to the redevelopment, the presence of the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park and it’s residents, and Bush Forever considerations for Lot 211. A site just East of the proposed access road and entry to the caravan park was ultimately chosen as the best fit (refer Attachment 1).
Due to the redevelopment project being in 2 stages, there was a need to have the facility moved to allow the commencement of the stage 1 earthworks, with the site chosen for the proposed lease being prepared nearer the completion of stage 1 works. As a result it was agreed that the facility would be temporarily relocated within the confines of the caravan park. EPA submitted a Development Application, which was forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) and subsequently approved.
This temporary move was on the basis that EPA would pay the appropriate fees, and electricity charges, under the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges, as if it were utilising the park on a long-term stay basis. EPA, at its cost, relocated the facility to the caravan park site in November 2003 and has operated from there since that date.
A separate Development Application was also required for the proposed leased site and approval to commence development was granted by WAPC on 31 October 2003, subject to various conditions (refer Attachment 2).
Detail
Stage 1 construction at Lot 211 is nearing completion and the proposed site for the AQMS should be available shortly. At this point EPA have agreed, at its cost, to move the facility to the new site, subject to Council approval to the proposed lease arrangement. As part of the negotiations EPA have also agreed to bear the costs associated with the provision of power and telephone services to the site together with the reasonable costs of the City in carrying out site works as part of Stage 1.
Lease negotiations have effectively been finalised with the essential terms of the agreement as follows:-
Land Lease Rental |
$1.00 per annum. |
Administration Fee |
$200.00 per annum payable annually in advance (in lieu of rental payment). |
Lease Term |
Ten (10) years. |
Commencement Date |
To be agreed. A suitable date would be when the City advises EPA that the site is available and ready for them to relocate the AQMS. |
Permitted Purpose |
The installation, operation and maintenance of an Air Quality Monitoring Site. |
Rates & Taxes |
Lessee responsibility. |
Services & outgoings |
Lessee responsibility. |
Maintenance, Insurance & Cleaning |
Lessee responsibility. |
Lessee to make good. |
As the proposed arrangement is a Land Lease the City has no interest as such in the structures etc. The lease will provide that at the expiration or sooner determination of the lease the Lessee shall remove all improvements and leave the land in a clean and level condition. |
Legal Costs |
The Lessee shall bear the reasonable legal costs of the City in relation to the preparation and completion of the proposed lease. These costs are $936.65 (inclusive of GST). |
Comment
The proposed land lease to EPA is seen as having no detrimental effect on the development of Lot 211 in that the site chosen is approved on the basis that the EPA install and plant landscaping to beautify the boundary of the site to a reasonable standard having regard to the fact that the site is situated on land which comprises a caravan park and café complex.
EPA will not be required to landscape to the extent that it would prevent them from complying with any Australian Standard with respect to the operation of the AQMS.
Statutory Compliance
Minister for Lands or WAPC approvals are not required for the lease as the land in question is held in Freehold to the City and the proposed term of the lease is for 10 years or less.
Strategic Implications
The lease is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan as follows:
“2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”.
Policy Implications
Whilst the terms for the proposed lease were negotiated prior to the adoption of the new Tenancy Policy (5.2.1), it is still consistent with the requirements of that Policy.
Financial Implications
The lease provides for an annual administrative fee of $200 to be paid by EPA in lieu of a rental payment. They have indicated that they would prefer to pay this amount upfront as a lump sum of $2,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the leasing of a portion of Quinns Lot 211 being approximately 144m² to the Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia for the purpose of operating an Air Quality Monitoring Station, for a Term of Ten (10) years subject to:
a) the EPA relocating, at it’s cost, the AQMS from its current location within the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park to the agreed site, as soon as is practicable, upon being advised by the City that the site is available;
b) the EPA bearing the costs associated with the provision of power and telephone services to the site together with the reasonable costs of the City in carrying out the site works as part of the Stage 1 development;
c) the EPA bearing the reasonable legal costs of the City in relation to negotiating the final format of the lease document. Such costs being $936.65 (inclusive of GST).
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to execute and affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the lease between the City of Wanneroo and the Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S07/0038
File Name: ACommunity Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Kristy Costello
Meeting Date: 17 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the draft Community Art Policy and draft document Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo.
Background
Administration is currently developing a series of policies relating to the different areas of art in which the City is involved. The Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo are intended to be a supporting document for these draft and future policies.
The Art Advisory Committee at its meeting on 26 July 2004 made the recommendation to the Policy and Local Laws Committee that the Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo be presented to Council for Adoption. The two documents are presented together as one supports the other.
Detail
The City of Wanneroo currently only has one policy relating to art, the Art Collection Policy. It is planned that a series of policies are developed to cover the main areas of art that the City has involvement in. They include policies on Community Art, Public Art and Percent for Art.
The Community Art Policy details the City’s role and objectives and how the City will manage such projects. The document is important as it provides a framework for making decisions in relation to community art. It also sets out the City’s commitment to providing opportunities for communities to express their collective identity through art and culture.
To complement the Art Collection Policy, draft Community Art Policy and future policies, the document Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo has been developed. The document is a broad overriding statement that details the benefits of art; the City’s values and principles, objectives and role. It also includes definitions for some key terms used in the policies.
Consultation
The Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo were presented to the Art Advisory Committee on 26 July 2004. The committee’s recommendation to the Policy and Local Laws Committee is that the Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo are presented to Council for Adoption.
The Art Advisory Committee includes two Art Professionals as part of its membership. They are both professional artists and are well placed as representatives of the artistic community to provide advise on such issues.
Comment
The two documents have been developed after considerable research by Administration of similar documents from across Australia. They will provide important guidance for the development and implementation of art projects within the City of Wanneroo.
It is Administration’s opinion that the Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo are presented to Council for adoption.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The development of these two documents relate to the City’s strategic initiative Healthy Communities, particularly:
“2.51 Work in cooperation with the community to develop an identity that is linked to the natural and built environment.”
Policy Implications
The Community Art Policy relates to community art projects run by or within the City of Wanneroo. Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo will support the art policies by giving a broader understanding to art and how it relates to the City.
Financial Implications
The Community Art Policy will have minor financial implications, as it will influence the types of community art projects that Council will support.
The Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo will provide a framework from which to make consistent decisions.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Officer Recommendation:
That the Policy and Local Laws Committee RECOMMEND that Council ADOPTS the Policy ‘Community Art Policy and Guiding Principles for Art in Wanneroo’ as detailed below.
Policy & Local Laws Committee Recommendation: 17/08/2004
That Council:-
1. ADOPT the Community Art Policy as detailed below inclusive of an amendment presented by the Policy & Local Laws Committee stating that the second dot point under Service Provision (Hold a number of music concerts each year) be removed from the Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo.
Policy Owner: Community Development
Distribution: All Employees
Implementation: September 2004
Scheduled Review: September 2007
Statement
The City of Wanneroo is committed to providing opportunities for communities to express their collective identity through art and culture.
Community art is a community based arts practice or process that involves collaboration of professional artists and communities to create art.
Objective
This policy will ensure that Community Art Projects:
1. Allow communities to express their identity through cultural activities.
2. Are of a high artistic and technical standards.
3. Diverse in artform and approach.
4. Supportive of local artists where possible.
5. Improve the aesthetics of the given locale
Role
To achieve the objectives the City will:
1. Encourage a range of community groups to be involved in community art projects.
2. Assist community groups in developing their own community art projects.
3. Provide financial assistance where appropriate
4. Provide project management assistance where appropriate
5. Promote the cultural environment of the City through provision of quality community art projects.
Scope
This policy is relevant to the following entities:
1. Council Officers
2. Art Advisory Committee
3. Artists and community groups
Management
The City of Wanneroo will manage community art by:
1. Ensuring an even delivery of projects across the City.
2. Implement a program to maintain projects after they have been installed.
3. Make visual records of projects and create a file of projects for reference and promotional purposes.
4. Allowing the Art Advisory Committee to deliver informed decisions on the selection of community art projects to be funded.
Identification of projects
The City will advertise once per year for expressions of interest from community groups to run projects. The Community Arts Officer will be able to work in collaboration with groups to develop and manage their project.
All mediums are encouraged including all forms of visual and performing arts. The key element is community involvement. Council encourages a diverse range of projects and innovative ideas.
The Art Advisory Committee will select a number of community art projects each year based on the criteria set out in the application form and make recommendations to Council.
Responsibility for Implementation
Director Community Development
2. ADOPT the Guiding Principles for Art in Wanneroo as detailed below:-
Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo
1 Introduction
1.1 About Wanneroo
The City of Wanneroo has a proud pioneering history, themes of which are often used in artworks commissioned by the City as a way to preserve our cultural heritage.
The City’s boundaries are far reaching and cover a variety of landscapes from crystal beaches to wetlands, rural bushland and urban development.
In our rapidly growing environment, the City of Wanneroo is increasingly aware of the benefits of art in the community. The City supports the arts through the provision of public and community art projects, family concerts and art exhibitions. Where possible, the City likes to support and encourage local artists.
1.2 Benefits of Art
· Express local identity and distinctiveness
· Enhance the overall design, visual appearance and personality of a place
· Encourage expression of cultural diversity
· Highlight aspects of social, cultural and natural heritage
· Enhance the quality, character and animation of public places
· Develop community spirit and pride
· Enhance the local economy
· Employment and training opportunities for artists and local businesses
· Encourage innovation in design and manufacture
A well-designed aesthetic environment will create an improved social and economic climate. People care for places that reflect local identity and character. Visitors remember places that are attractive and unique.
1.3 Definitions
Public Art
Public art refers to artworks created by professional artists located in public spaces and buildings other than galleries or museums. It can be in outdoor environments such as parks, sporting facilities, main street precincts, city squares and foreshores or indoor environments such as office building foyers, libraries, hospitals, shopping centres and schools.
Community Art
A community based arts practice or process that involves the collaboration of professional artists and communities to create art. Community Art projects aim to express a communities’ identity as well as having artistic outcomes. They usually involve one or more artists facilitating and coordinating community member’s creative expression. These projects can be in any medium from either the visual or performing arts.
Visual Arts
Visual art involves the use or manipulation of materials to create an image or object. It includes painting, drawing, sculpture, printmaking, photo-media, ceramics, glass and fibre-arts.
Performing Arts
Performing arts involves the dynamic use of movement and sound and is performed in the moment. They include live dance, music and theatre.
Community
Community is a group of people who share a common interest or a sense of unity. A community may be formed by geographic location; common cultural background, age, race, political beliefs or they may share an activity or interest such as sport or the environment.
Professional Artist
A professional artist is one who identifies themself as such on the basis of skills and experience; is accepted by the arts industry as a professional, but may or may not derive an income from their artwork.
Art Collection
The City of Wanneroo Art Collection contains all types of artwork including paintings, prints, photographs, ceramics, aboriginal artefacts, metalwork and sculpture. The Art Advisory Committee makes recommendations for purchases each year based on the criteria set out in the Art Collection Policy. All artworks are by Western Australian artists. The Art Collection is a cultural and financial investment for the City.
Culture
Culture is the way people live their lives. This includes how people think and behave, their values, the relationships that are important to them and the activities they choose to do.
Many factors can influence the culture of a community, including the environment in which people live and socio demographic factors such as age, gender, education, income and place of birth.
Ephemeral Art
Art that is transient or temporary, including billboards, multi media installations, lighting and projected images, street banners, temporary installations and performing arts including dance, performance, music and drama.
Percent for Art
The Percent for Art Scheme is a State Government strategy for including art in capital works projects. Since1993, civic buildings from the state’s capital works list with a total cost exceeding $2M are considered for a Percent for Art component where up to 1% of the total budget can be allocated to commission WA artists to create public artworks. This scheme is not compulsory and is administered by the Department of Housing and Works. Council has developed a similar model for its capital works projects.
2. Guiding Principles
2.1 Aim
Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo will provide a framework for involving art in Council business; enhance the cultural aspects of the City and ensure that art is considered in the planning and design of our built and natural environment.
2.2 Values and Principles
In developing these values and principles the City of Wanneroo:
q Demonstrates its support for the arts
q Acknowledges the role of the arts and community cultural development in facilitating economic growth
q Supports the traditional role of the artist as commentator on social and philosophical issues
q Values the skills, experience and creative vision of professional artists in contributing to a creative, inclusive and vibrant community.
q Will provide opportunities for the community to participate in the creation of artworks through involvement in community art projects and the planning of public art projects.
2.3 Objectives
The Guiding Principles for Art in the City of Wanneroo aims to ensure that art is:
q Of high artistic and technical standards
q Diverse in art form and approach
q Is supportive of local artists where possible
q Well maintained, interpreted and promoted
q Enjoyed, understood and appreciated by residents and visitors
q Responsive to the culture and characteristics of the community
q Integrated with urban design objectives where applicable
2.4 Role
The City of Wanneroo is able to play an active role in developing the arts in the City. The major roles the City of Wanneroo in developing the arts are:
Policy and Planning
This role involves the City of Wanneroo in identifying and responding to the needs of the community and providing a framework for setting priorities and implementing strategies to address these needs. Policy and planning provides a transparent process to enable the community to understand the City of Wanneroo’s decision making and action in relation to the arts.
Advocacy
Promoting the benefits of art is crucial to encouraging the private sector and different communities to initiate their own projects. The City of Wanneroo will encourage the private sector to include art in the natural and built environment.
Leadership & Coordination
At times the City of Wanneroo will provide active leadership in order to facilitate artistic development that will benefit the Wanneroo community. Coordination involves providing links between organisations and the development of joint projects and partnerships.
Service Provision
The City of Wanneroo will be active in providing opportunities for the community to participate in the arts including but not limited to:
2.5 Policies Relating to this Document
Under this Art Statement, is a number of sub policies relating to specific areas of art including:
Acknowledgements
Hastings Council – Living Environments Art in Public Places Policy
Australia Council – Community Cultural Development website 2003
City of Fremantle – Making Space Creating Place – Artworks in Public Places Strategy October 2001
ArtsWA – Arts Development Policy (Draft June 2003)
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S16/0034V01
File Name: AAPreferred Service Provider Agreements Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service Wanneroo Youth Service Clarkson
Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 17 August 2004an.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Garry Prus
Meeting Date: 1 September 2004
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider offers for continued Preferred Service Provider funding from the Department for Community Development (DCD) for the delivery of the Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service, the City of Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) and the Yanchep Youth Service.
Background
The City has been providing the above services since successfully tendering for DCD funding in 1998. Contractual arrangements between the City and DCD for the provision of these services are due to expire at the end of September 2004.
Over the last three years DCD has commenced a review of all their service contracts and introduced a Preferred Service Provider (PSP) process allowing agencies to provide a service for a three-year period without ongoing and repetitive open tender processes.
The City was invited (and has subsequently been successful) in applying for Preferred Service Provider status for the ongoing delivery of these services, for a three-year period commencing from the expiration of the current contract.
Detail
Details of the services to be considered in this report are;
Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service
The Financial Counselling Service Contract represents a $51,794.44 p.a. grant to the City for the provision of financial planning, advice and crisis management programs for low income and financially disadvantaged residents of the City. This funding is further complemented with federal funding for further financial counselling and emergency relief services. This figure does not include the 15% State Homelessness Strategy increase of $7,769.17 which is due for review and may or may not continue after 2005/2006.
DCD funding employs a full time worker, with Council contributing to administrative and corporate program costs.
Outcomes for the service for the six month period 1 January to 30 June 2004 include a total of 151 client cases equating to 828 support actions and referrals.
Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson)
The Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) contract represents a $55,614.42 p.a. grant to the City for the provision of youth programs and youth development initiatives in the Clarkson, Merriwa, Mindarie and Quinns Rock area of the City.
DCD funding supports a 0.8 f.t.e. Youth Development Officer position for the region.
Council further contributes to services for youth in the region via administrative and corporate costs as well as operational support for the Clarkson Youth Centre.
Outcomes from the service for the six month period 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2004 include a total of 1491 contacts with 222 referrals to other support agencies and a total of 154 young people identified as being “at risk”.
Yanchep Youth Service
This contract represents a $38,621.12 p.a. grant to the City for the provision of services to youth in the Yanchep, Two Rocks and St Andrews areas (0.2 f.t.e. Youth Development Officer position and program development costs).
Outcomes from the service for the six month period 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2004 include a total of 345 contacts with 182 referrals to other support agencies and a total of 94 young people identified as being “at risk”.
The annual funding level is subject to indexation as appropriate to cover any liability for GST and other such allowances as applicable.
Comment
The City has utilised DCD funding to enhance the delivery of this service type to the families and young people in our northern suburbs, since 1998.
The services provided are well utilised, meet all specification schedules and are responsive to an identified gap in service delivery. They factor highly in supporting local client needs.
A reduction in the levels of service delivery would certainly have a negative effect on youth and family issues and detract from the lifestyle and living opportunities available to local residents.
There are limited alternate funding streams available for the ongoing provision of these services and funding support from DCD significantly reduces the direct cost to Council for providing these services.
There are few alternate agencies able to fill the resulting gaps in service delivery that would eventuate from not entering into new service contract arrangements. Any alternate agency providing services at the offered levels of funding would have to significantly reduce the level of direct service provided, resulting in a considerable drop in service provision to our northern residents and a further gap for Council to address.
The term of this agreement is for a three year period, however should Council change its focus in this area of service provision, this agreement may be terminated at any time during this period by providing 90 days written notice of termination to the Department.
To accept the offer for Preferred Service Provider status for these services, there is a requirement to formally accept the DCD offer with endorsement from the Mayor and CEO and the use of the City’s common seal.
Statutory Compliance
A Council resolution is required to allow the Mayor and CEO to affix the common seal.
Strategic Implications
The provision of services to the financially disadvantaged and youth populations is congruent with the City’s Strategic Plan in the following areas;
“2. Healthy Communities
To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and provision of quality services and infrastructure.
2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future
2.4 Support safe and secure communities
2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
An operational budget for the provision of the Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service, the City of Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) and the Yanchep Youth Service has been prepared and adopted as part of Council’s 2004/05 budgetary processes. Existing Council budgets are inclusive of these expected grants.
Overall costs associated with the provision of these services are as illustrated below;
Service |
Grant |
Direct Costs (Expenditure) |
Result |
Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service |
$51,794.44 |
$74,178 |
($22,383.56) |
City of Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) |
$55,614.42 |
$90,661 |
($35,046.58) |
Yanchep Youth Service |
$38,621.12 |
$45,869 |
($7,247.88) |
Acceptance of the DCD offer for Preferred Service Provider status would ensure annual access to funding at the above levels plus annual CPI increases for the duration of the agreement.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the City entering into new three-year agreements with the Department for Community Development for the provision of the Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service, the Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) and the Yanchep Youth Service under the department’s Preferred Service Provider model.
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to execute and affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo to agreements with the Department for Community Development for the provision of the Wanneroo Financial Counselling Service, the Wanneroo Youth Service (Clarkson) and the Yanchep Youth Service.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PR07/0004V01
Responsible Officer: Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Recreation Development Officer - Honni Jacobs
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 2
File Name: BACarramar Community Centre .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 3 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 19 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 19 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Honni Jacobs Date 16 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the Concept Plans for the purpose of Public Comment for the development of Carramar Community Centre, Houghton Park, Carramar.
Background
The Carramar Community Centre will be developed on the community purpose site of Houghton Park, Carramar. Houghton Park is defined as the parcel of land bounded by Joondalup Drive, Cheriton Drive, Houghton Drive and Millendon Street. In addition to the community purpose site it is set out to contain a primary school site, public open space, R40 residential site and Shopping Centre. It is to have a road ring connection from Joondalup Drive to Cheriton Drive that divides the Shopping Centre and community purpose sites from the rest of the area.
At its meeting held in September 2002, (CD18-09/02) Council resolved to complete a Feasibility Study assessing the need and possible design options for community facilities (playing fields and community centre) in Carramar. Council also endorsed the establishment of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group. The role of the Reference Group was outlined as to:
· Oversee the completion of a Feasibility Study examining a community facility and active open space in Carramar
· To provide input and oversee the community consultation process association with the project
· To provide comment on and advise on research conducted by administration specific to the study and to,
· Provide recommendations to Council on the results of the Feasibility Study
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council noted the results of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study, including the community consultation program and recommendations of the Carramar Community Reference Group. Council also endorsed the development of detailed drawings and plans for the site, based on the concept plan shown in Attachment 1.
Detail
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council noted the results of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study, including the community consultation program and recommendation of the Carramar Community Reference Group. These recommendations included the site to include the following functional aspects:
· A multipurpose community facility (based on the City’s existing model at Warradale Park, Landsdale) that incorporates:
A large multipurpose meeting space suitable for parties and social occasions as well as temporary sports such as table tennis or pool
Kitchen facilities suitable for the re-heating/ serving of food
A “wet area” suitable for courses such as mosaics and other arts and crafts activities
1-2 smaller meeting rooms for small classes (support groups etc) or the ability to convert the large meeting space into smaller areas
Playgroup/crèche facilities including a small fenced playground
A small outreach office space
Cabling to cater for linked computer usage / internet access if required in the future
Public toilets/ limited change rooms to service active open space facilities
Equipment stores
As an outcome of a tender process. Stephen Hart Architects were appointed to design and develop a concept plan for the Carramar Community Centre. WT Partnerships were appointed as the independent cost planner for the project.
Consultation
A draft concept plan (Attachment 2) has been prepared by the Architect and is now submitted for approval in order to enter into a community consultation stage. Once endorsed by Council, this concept plan will be presented to the Carramar Residents Association and be submitted for public comment for a period of 28 days.
As part of the public comment process the concept plan will be advertised on the City’s website and Wanneroo Link advertisement in the local community paper. It will also be available for inspection and comment at the City’s Administration building and downloadable from the City’s website. A letter will also be sent to the residents immediately surrounding the reserve to allow them to make comment on the concept plan.
Comment
The original concept plan that was developed for the Carramar Community Centre was based on the City’s existing model at Warradale Park, Landsdale. It had a building area of 496sqm and the estimated cost in March 2003 was $863,000 including fee and a 48 bay carpark.
The architectural design brief prepared for the project sought to refine the concept plan to provide functional aspects such as a large function room to seat 150 people, 2 multipurpose child areas with enclosed playgrounds (including rubber soft fall) kitchen facilities and adequate storage. The area of the building costed was 717sqm. It was considered, though whilst the level of amenity being provided was desirable, the costs were well in excess.
Following discussion with the Ward Councillors it was agreed to review the design to reduce the costs.
The reviewed Concept Plan (Attachment 2) has been prepared in order to meet as many of the functional requirements as set out by the project Design Brief as possible but with a lower total project cost estimate.
It was designed to include the following functional elements:
Large Function Room to seat 150 people
Foyer
Function Room Kitchen
Office
Meeting Room
Multipurpose child area
Enclosed playground with rubber soft fall
Multipurpose room kitchen
Toilets
5 storerooms
74 bay carpark
550sqm building area
This represents an increase in size of 54 sqm over the original concept and an additional 26 vehicle parking bays.
The Concept Plan provides a clear vision and direction for future development. It has included all elements recommended by the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group and provides opportunities for recreational and leisure pursuits seen as important to both residents and Council. It is envisaged that Carramar Community Centre will become a focal point for the community and will create a sense of pride.
It will be recommended that the Carramar Community Centre Concept Plan as shown in Attachment 2 be endorsed and that approval be granted for the public comment process to be proceeded with.
A further report will be submitted outlining the outcome of the community consultation process and seeking Council approval to proceed with the project. The anticipated time frame is as follows:
Community Consultation: September 2004.
Report to Council for approval to proceed October 2004.
Design and documentation November-December 2004.
Tender Process February March 2005
Construction commencement April 2005
Construction completion September 2005
Statutory Compliance
All necessary statutory and regulatory approvals will be obtained during the design and consultation process.
Strategic Implications
The endorsement and subsequent public comment of the Houghton Park Concept Plan supports the City’s Strategic Goal 2. Healthy Communities as follows:
“2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future.
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community, and
2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council resolved to budget the $863,372 over the 2003/04 and 2004/05 financial years to fund the project.
In considering the costs of the project advise was sought from the WT Partnership as to the impact of cost increases on the overall project and what allowances for increases will have to be provided for between now and the anticipated time of tender being February 2005. They have advised that there has been an escalation in building costs for the period between May 2003 and today’s date of 12%.
Evidence exists of certain individual building trades exhibiting increases of up to 25% during this period e.g. Structural Steelwork, Concrete trades and mechanical Services. WT Partnership also advise it would be prudent to allow a further anticipated increase in construction costs to the proposed date of tender of approximately 5 %.
The cost estimates as provided by the WT Partnership for the design and construction of the Carramar Community Centre as depicted in Attachment 2 are as follows:
· Building Cost including Fees: $1,000,000
· Allowance for Fit Out: $ 37,000
· Vehicle Parking area: $ 170,000
· Provision for escalation:- $ 60,000
· Total Indicative Costs $1,267,000
The budget for 2004/05 provides an allocation of $925,000 in Project 814054 with the sum of $79,264 being carried forward in Project 4054. Total funding available in 2004/2005 is therefore
$1,004,264.
Application was made on 14 June 2004 to LotteryWest for a grant of $250,000 toward the cost of the project. The outcome of this application will not be known for several weeks.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the Carramar Community Centre Concept Plan as outlined in ATTACHMENT 2 for the purpose of public consultation in regards to the future development and utilisation of the Carramar Community Centre, Carramar.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: PR07/0004V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Recreation Development Officer - Honni Jacobs
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 2
File Name: BAHoughton Park and Carramar Community Centre Developments.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Geof Whyte Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Honni Jacobs Date 13 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the Concept Plan for the purpose of Public Comment for the development of Houghton Park, Carramar.
Background
Houghton Park is defined as the parcel of land bounded by Joondalup Drive, Cheriton Drive, Houghton Drive and Millendon Street. It is set out to contain a primary school site, public open space, community purpose site, R40 residential site and Shopping Centre. It is to have a ring road connection from Joondalup Drive to Cheriton Drive that divides the Shopping Centre and community purpose sites from the rest of the area.
At its meeting held in September 2002, (CD18-09/02) Council resolved to complete a Feasibility Study assessing the need and possible design options for community facilities (playing fields and community centre) in Carramar. Council also endorsed the establishment of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group. The role of the Reference Group was outlined as to:
· Oversee the completion of a Feasibility Study examining a community facility and active open space in Carramar
· To provide input and oversee the community consultation process association with the project
· To provide comment on and advise on research conducted by administration specific to the study and to,
· Provide recommendations to Council on the results of the Feasibility Study
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council noted the results of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study, including the community consultation program and recommendation of the Carramar Community Reference Group. Council also endorsed the development of detailed drawings and plans for the site, based on the concept plan shown in Attachment 1.
Detail
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council noted the results of the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study, including the community consultation program and recommendation of the Carramar Community Reference Group. These recommendations outlined the site to include the following functional aspects:
· An active senior sized sporting field to cater for soccer, cricket and, if possible, junior football (secondary need)
· A passive recreational space incorporating BBQ areas, a children’s playground and a BMX track with the potential for conversion/expansion to a skate park/ wheeled facility within 5 years
· A multipurpose community facility (based on the City’s existing model at Warradale Park, Landsdale) that incorporates;
Ø A large multipurpose meeting space suitable for parties and social occasions as well as temporary sports such as table tennis or pool
Ø Kitchen facilities suitable for the re-heating/ serving of food
Ø A “wet area” suitable for courses such as mosaics and other arts and crafts activities
Ø 1-2 smaller meeting rooms for small classes (support groups etc) or the ability to convert the large meeting space into smaller areas
Ø Playgroup/crèche facilities including a small fenced playground
Ø A small outreach office space
Ø Cabling to cater for linked computer usage / internet access if required in the future
Ø Public toilets/ limited change rooms to service active open space facilities
Ø Equipment stores
Consultation
A draft concept plan (refer Attachment 2) was prepared as an outcome of the recommendations given by the Reference Group. Once endorsed by Council, this concept plan will be presented to the Carramar Residents Associations and be submitted for public comment for a period of 28 days.
As part of the public comment process the concept plan will be advertised on the City’s website and Wanneroo Link advertisement in the local community paper. It will also be available for inspection and comment at the City’s Administration building and downloadable from the City’s website. A letter will also be sent to the residents immediately surrounding the reserve to allow them to make comment on the concept plan.
Comment
The proposed Houghton Park Concept Plan provides a clear vision and direction for future development. It has included all elements recommended by the Carramar Community Facility and Active Open Space Feasibility Study Reference Group and provides both active and passive recreational and sporting opportunities seen as important to both residents and Council. It is envisaged that Houghton Park will become a focal point for the community and will create a sense of pride.
It will be recommended that the Houghton Park Concept Plan as shown in Attachment 2 be endorsed and that approval be granted for the public comment process to be proceeded with.
Statutory Compliance
All necessary statutory and regulatory approvals will be obtained during the design and consultation process.
Strategic Implications
The endorsement and subsequent public comment of the Houghton Park Concept Plan supports the City’s Strategic Goal 2. Healthy Communities as follows:
“2.1 Achieve an understanding of our community’s needs – present and future.
2.6 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community, and
2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
At its meeting in April 2003 (CD14-04/03) Council among other things, resolved to provide funding for the project for a sum of $830,121 for the development of playing fields and recreational places and associated services on the public open space and community purposes site in Carramar subject to discussions regarding possible funding opportunities with the Department of Education, Lotteries Commission and other potential funding bodies.
The $830,121 is to fund the following elements:
· $20,000 for the construction of BMX track
· $302,520 for the construction of passive open space
· $507,601 for the construction of playing fields and carpark
The Department of Education and Training has commenced the construction of the Carramar Primary School. A number of meetings have been held with the City to co-ordinate the open space development particularly the active reserve component to allow integration of the School portion of the junior sized sports field that will form part of the active open space. The City has entered into discussions regarding a joint use agreement with the Department of Education and Training for the use and cost sharing of the active reserve.
The approved budget given to the successful tender, Hames Sharley Landscape Architects was outlined as $850,000 which was to include all fees, construction costs and furnishings. Costs estimates for the development of Houghton Park as set out in the Concept Plan have been provided by Hames Sharley Landscape Architects. In summary they indicate a total project cost of $854,620.81, which is inclusive of professional fees and contingencies and exclusive of goods and service tax.
This cost estimate does not include provision for active reserve floodlighting which was estimated at $150,000 as this is considered a possible future addition to the reserve pending further investigation and establishment of need.
It is to be noted that the budget for 2004-2005 has an allowance of $655,600 Houghton Park Carramar Stage 1 - $500,000 is project # 825546 (including $155,600 carried forward from 2003/2004 – project # 4545) for “the development of passive and active open space in accordance with the design being prepared by Hames Sharley including sports fields, vehicle parking, passive areas. Final costs subject to completed design”. Funding for Stage 2 will be sought in the 2004/2005 budget process.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the Houghton Park Concept Plan as outlined within Attachment 2 for the purpose of public consultation in regards to the future development and utilisation of Houghton Park, Carramar.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P34/1938V01
File Name: CAApplication To Keep More Than Two Dogs.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Brigitte Creighton Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Resmie Greer
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider an application for an exemption to Council’s Local Laws under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 stipulates:
“A person shall not keep or permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a) 2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age; or
b) 6 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the premises are situated within a rural area or comprise a lot in a special rural area having an area of 4 hectares or more;
unless the premises is licensed as an approved kennel establishment or has been granted an exemption pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 and have planning approval under the Town Planning Scheme.”
Detail
The following application has been made under the Dog Act 1976 and is submitted for consideration:
Address of Applicant
|
Description of Dogs |
28 Quarkum Street, Wanneroo |
· Male sterilised white/brindle coloured Staffordshire Bull Terrier · Male sterilised black/white coloured Blue Heeler · Female Staffordshire Bull Terrier Cross tan coloured |
A Ranger has inspected the property to ensure that means exist on the premises at which the dogs will ordinarily be kept for effectively confining the dogs within the premises.
Address of Applicant |
Property Zoning |
Size of Property
|
28 Quarkum Street, Wanneroo
|
Residential
|
0.0739 ha |
Consultation
It has been the practice where an application is received by the City to keep more than two dogs, that residents immediately adjoining the applicant’s property in question have been consulted by letter to ascertain if they have any objections.
On this occasion the following objections have been received:
Number of residents consulted: 5
Number of objections received: Nil
Comment
In considering this application for exemption, the following two options are available:
a) Council
may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 subject to
conditions;
b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.
A check of the City’s records reveals that prior to this application being made no previous complaints have been lodged with Ranger and Safety Services in relation to the dogs at the premises.
The applicant purchased the third dog from the City’s Animal Care Centre and was unaware of the City of Wanneroo Local Laws 1999 (Clause 14) which restricts the number of dogs allowed to be kept in residential areas. The applicant also advised that “Jack” the Blue Heeler belongs to her daughter who is currently building a new home and upon completion will be taking possession of “Jack”.
The Ranger advises that the property and fencing is more than adequate for the confinement and exercise of three dogs and the applicant informed that the sleeping area for dogs is in the house. The has recommended that an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Local laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Statutory Compliance
The application for exemption to Council’s Local Law made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 has been detailed in this report.
Strategic Implications
2. Healthy Communities
“To foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choice and provision of quality services and infrastructure
Goal 2.5 Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
Goal 2.7 Provide community focussed services and lifestyle opportunities.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. GRANTS an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep three dogs at the premises known as number 28 Quarkum Street, Wanneroo, subject to the specified conditions:
a) i) If any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no replacement is to be obtained;
ii) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum;
iii) This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered reasonable.
2. RESERVES THE RIGHT to vary or revoke, at any future date, the exemption given to the applicant should any relevant conditions be contravened.
3. ADVISES the adjoining neighbours of this decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Strategic & Executive Services
File Ref: S07/0057V01
File Name: BADonations and Sponsorship Requests Determined Under Delegated Authority August 2004.doc This line will not be printed
Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 13 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 13 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 13 August 2004dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Rhonda Phillips
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To note donations and sponsorship applications considered and determined by the Chief Executive Officer during August 2004, in accordance with the provisions of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
Council endorsed the reviewed Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy under which these requests were considered, at their ordinary meeting held on the 20 July 2004.
This policy delegates the consideration and determination of requests for donations, sponsorships and the waiver of fees and charges under the value of $500.00 to the Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
During August, the City received the following requests to be considered under the delegated authority of the CEO:
· One (1) request for sponsorship, and
· Three (3) requests for donations.
Comment
In accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy, determinations were made as listed in the recommendation to this report.
A complete list of original applications and assessments of each against the policy is available in the Elected Members Reading Room for further information.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
The financial implications of this round of requests has resulted in expenditure in the Governance Donations Account (05201 0001 4402) of:
· $0.00 from the 2004/2005 budget.
A remaining balance of $37,525.56 is available from the 2004/2005 financial year.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of requests received by the City in July 2004 for donations, sponsorships and waiver of fees and charges, which are as follows:
Organisation |
Event/Activity |
Action |
Reason |
1. Kukuleczka Polish Dance Group |
Sponsorship of Joanna Wydmanski to participate in the Tainan International Chichi Arts Festival held in Taiwan in August 2004. |
NOT APPROVE a donation to the Kukuleczka Polish Dancing Group for sponsorship of Joanna Wydmanski to support her participation in the Tainan International Chichi Arts Festival held in Taiwan in August 2004. |
As this individual is over the age of 18, this request cannot be supported under the policy. |
2. Sue Moir |
Donation of costs of a trophy for a car rally to be held on 16th October 2004 to raise awareness and funds for the Ronald McDonald House and The Children’s Leukaemia and Cancer Research Foundation Inc. |
NOT APPROVE a donation to Sue Moir towards a trophy for a car rally to be held on 16th October 2004 to raise awareness and funds for the Ronald McDonald House and The Children’s Leukaemia and Cancer Research Foundation Inc |
This request will provide minimal benefit to the residents of the City of Wanneroo. |
3. Country Medical Foundation |
Request for a donation towards scholarships for medical and nursing students from a rural background who are more likely to return to the country after graduation |
NOT APPROVE a donation request from the Country Medical Foundation towards scholarships for medical and nursing students. |
As this is a general fundraising request it does not meet the criteria of the policy, therefore cannot be supported. |
4. Doctors Without Borders |
Request for a donation towards the Sudan Emergency Appeal. |
NOT APPROVE a donation request from Doctors Without Borders for the Sudan Emergency Appeal. |
This request does not meet the policy due to it having no benefit to City of Wanneroo residents, being a general fundraising request and that it does not support the City’s strategic direction. |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057V01
File Name: BARequest for a Donation August 2004.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by Rhonda Phillips Date 16 August 2004
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Rhonda Phillips
Meeting Date: 31 August 2004
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider requests for a donations in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
Council endorsed the reviewed Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy at its ordinary meeting held on the 20 July 2004.
This policy requires applications for over $500.00 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently, a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
Detail
During this period, the City has received two requests for donations to be considered by Council. These requests are summarised on the following pages. The applications are included as Attachment 1 to this report.
Comment
Applicant 1 – West Coast College of TAFE |
|
Request Amount:
|
$500.00
|
Description of Request: |
Request for a donation towards the West Coast TAFE Joondalup Campus and Camp Quality one day event for Camp Quality children and their families on Sunday the 31st October 2004. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation: |
Nil |
Status of the applicant organisation: |
Educational institution |
Exclusivity of the event or project: |
A minimum of 150 Camp Quality children and their families are expected to attend. |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction: |
This request supports the Healthy Communities initiative in the City’s Strategic Plan. |
Potential benefits to the Wanneroo community: |
This event provides an opportunity for students at the TAFE to gain experience in event organisation and an opportunity for children who have cancer an opportunity for a fun day out. It is estimated that approximately 30 families from the City of Wanneroo will participate in this event plus any extended family that these families bring along. |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation: |
· Other organisations have been approached for similar support. · $7,400 monetary contribution at the 2002 event, · $1,900 raised using raffles. |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organisation: |
· $3,600 monetary contribution at the 2002 event, · $24,400 in kind contribution at the 2002 event.
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City: |
$500 Donation August 2002 |
Commitment to acknowledgment of the City of Wanneroo: |
· Logo will appear on all printed matter, · Logo will be displayed at West Coast College on the day. |
Comment: |
Although a worthwhile event for children with cancer and their families, the benefit to resident of the City of Wanneroo is minimal with approximately 30 out of 150 participants being from the City. |
Recommendation: |
NOT APPROVE a donation to the West Coast College of TAFE Joondalup Campus towards a Camp Quality one day event for children who have cancer and their families. |
Reason: |
The policy states that 75% of the membership of a group to receive a donation need to be residents of the City of Wanneroo. The residents of the City will be 20% of those who will benefit from this request. |
Applicant 2 – Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club |
|
Request Amount:
|
$1,155
|
Description of Request: |
Request for a donation towards the club’s Annual Gala Day that was held on Sunday 8th August 2004. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation: |
This was a fundraising event. |
Status of the applicant organisation: |
Not for profit |
Exclusivity of the event or project: |
This event is open to the whole community to attend. There are 149 registered players who will benefit from any funds raised. |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction: |
This request supports the Healthy Communities initiative in the City’s Strategic Plan. |
Potential benefits to the Wanneroo community: |
This event is a fundraiser for the Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club to purchase footballs and football jumpers for the players. |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation: |
None specified |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant organisation: |
· Volunteer time to organise and run the event, · Advertising, · Prizes for competitions, and · Carrier costs |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City: |
· $500 May 2003 Waiver of Fees, · $1,000 March 2003 Community Funding, · $1,025 November 2001 Community Funding. |
Commitment to acknowledgment of the City of Wanneroo: |
The event has passed so acknowledgment will now only appear in newsletters if support is provided. |
Comment: |
This request is more appropriate for Community Funding rather than a donation. |
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a donation to the Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club towards the Annual Gala Day that was held on the 8th August 2004. |
Reason |
The policy states that if a request is eligible for Community Funding, it will not be considered for a donation. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations is aligned with the City’s strategic goals of developing and supporting Healthy Communities as follows:
“2 Healthy Communities
Foster an identity that promotes lifestyle choices and the provision of quality services and infrastructure.
Goal 2.5: Foster a community that finds strength in its diversity
Goal 2.6: Provide community focused services and lifestyle opportunities.”
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
Budget 2004/2005 Elected Member Donations |
|
$40,000.00 |
Amount expended to date
Under delegated authority: By Council determination: |
$2,474.44 $0.00 |
$2,474.44 |
Impact of approval of recommended applications
Donations: |
|
$0.00 |
TOTAL |
|
$0.00 |
Remaining Funds |
|
$37,525.56 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOT APPROVE a donation to the West Coast College of TAFE Joondalup Campus towards a Camp Quality one day event for children who have cancer and their families.
2. NOT APPROVE a donation to the Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club towards the Annual Gala Day that was held on the 8th August 2004.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0056V01
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Daniel Simms
Meeting Date: 17 August 2004
Attachments: 3
File Name: AReview of the Delegated Authority Register.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Level 4 Approval by Y. Heath Date 19 August 2004
Level 3 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 2 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
Level 1 Approval by nb Date 16 August 2004
StartStrip - This line will not be printed so do not delete
Issue
To consider the review of the City of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register and recommendation to Council on the adoption of the Delegated Authority Register as a result of this review.
Background
Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 12 August 2003 resolved as follows:
“That Council on the recommendation of the Policy and Local Laws Committee DELEGATE to the Chief Executive Officer by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY all Instruments of Delegations as detailed in Attachment 1. “
Detail
The Local Government Act 1995 requires that Chief Executive Officer review all delegations made to him from Council.
The Chief Executive Officer has conducted a thorough review of the Delegation Register and is seeking the Committee’s approval to recommend to Council the adoption the Delegated Authority Register without amendment.
Detailed in Attachment 1 is the Delegated Authority Register for approval by the Policy and Local Law Committee.
Comment
In order to assist the Committee in reviewing the Delegated Authority Register detailed in Attachment 2 to this report is a history of all decisions made under delegation for the period 01/07/03 to the 30/06/04.
Amendments and additions to the Delegated Authority Register approved by Council between the periods 01/07/03 to the 30/06/04 are detailed in Attachment 3.
As the Policy and Local Law Committee progresses through the review of the Corporate Policy Manual further changes to the Delegated Authority Register may occur as a result of policy amendments.
Statutory Compliance
The Local Government Act 1995 allows Council to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the majority of its powers as detailed below:
“5.42 (1) A local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or the discharge of any of its duties under this Act other than those referred to in section 5.43.
* Absolute Majority required.”
Section 5.43 states :
“5.43 A Local Government cannot delegate to a CEO any of the following powers or duties –
(a) any power or duty that requires a decision of an absolute majority or a 75% majority of the local government;
(b) accepting a tender which exceeds an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(c ) appointing an auditor
(d) acquiring or disposing of property valued at an amount exceeding an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(e) any of the local government’s powers under section 5.98, 5.99 or 5.100;
(f) borrowing money on behalf of the local government
(g) hearing or determining an objection of a kind referred to in section 9.5;
(h) any power or duty that required the approval of the Minister or the Governor; or
(i) such other powers or duties as may be prescribed.”
Section 5.44 states:-
“5.44. (1) A CEO may delegate to any employee of the local government the exercise of any of the CEO’s powers or the discharge of any of the CEO’s duties under this Act other than this power of delegation.
(2) A delegation under this section is to be in writing and may be general or as otherwise provided in the instrument of delegation.
(3) This section extends to a power or duty the exercise or discharge of which has been delegated by a local government to the CEO under section 5.42, but in the case of such a power or duty —
(a) the CEO’s power under this section to delegate the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty; and
(b) the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty by the CEO’s delegate, are subject to any conditions imposed by the local government on its delegation to the CEO.
(4) Subsection (3)(b) does not limit the CEO’s power to impose conditions or further conditions on a delegation under this section.
(5) In subsections (3) and (4) —
“conditions” includes qualifications, limitations or exceptions.”
Section 5.46 (2) states:-
“At least once every financial year, delegations made under this Division are to be reviewed by the delegator.”
Strategic Implications
One of the strategies contained in the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan relates to reviewing and developing policies covering governance and management of our City. A further strategy within the strategic plan is in the establishment of an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
The review and adoption of the Delegated Authority Register is both an important governance procedure but is also important in providing the community with a process that will be followed when Council delegates certain aspects of the decision making process aware from the Council meeting environment to the Chief Executive Officer.
Policy Implications
The Delegated Authority Register does relate closely to Council’s Policy Manual in that an instrument of delegation in the register references any Council Policy that provides for a decision to be made by the Chief Executive Officer.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council:-
1. CONSIDER the review conducted by the Chief Executive Officer on the Delegated Authority Register including the deletion of Delegation Numbers 69 – (Height and Scale of Buildings within a residential area); 70 – (Service Station setback standards) and 71 – (Two Dwellings on one lot); and
2. DELEGATE to the Chief Executive Officer by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY all Instruments of Delegations as detailed in Attachment 1 (inclusive of minor changes).
To view Attachments 1, 2 and 3 please select the link (Click here)
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete