Council
Agenda
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
7.00pm, 06 May, 2008
Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Council allows a minimum
of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting. If
there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person
presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can
be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine
whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no
member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into
conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time
may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s
wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main
reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of the
public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the
Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting
i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding
will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a
question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to
ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the
question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda,
the item number should also be stated.
The following general
rules apply to question and statement time:
·
Questions should only relate to
the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
·
Only questions relating to matters
affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special
meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be
considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the
meeting.
·
Questions may not be directed at
specific members of council or employees.
·
Questions & statements are not
to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected
Member or Officer.
·
The first priority will be given
to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting
agenda.
·
The second priority will be given
to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under
consideration will be heard.
The Mayor and
Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of
the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members
of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present
a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing, at least
three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief Executive
Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A request for a deputation
must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the Thursday before the Council
Meeting.
·
A deputation is not to exceed 3
persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
·
Members of a deputation are
collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless and
extension of time is granted by the Council.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
·
To ensure that there is a process
in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
·
To emphasise that the reason for
tape recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council
Meetings.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1)
Proceedings for meetings of the
Council, of electors and of the Audit Committee shall be recorded, by the City,
on sound recording equipment except, in the case of meetings of the Council or
the Audit Committee, where the Council or the Committee, as the case may be,
closes the meeting to the public.
(2)
Notwithstanding sub clause (1),
proceedings of a meeting of the Council or of the Audit Committee which is
closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council or the Audit
Committee, as the case requires, resolves to do so.
(3)
No member of the public is to use
any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the
proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the
Council.
Access to Recorded Tapes
(4)
Members of the public may purchase
a copy of the taped proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings
with the supervision of a City Officer.
(5)
Elected Members may listen to a
recording of the Council proceedings upon request, free of charge. However, no
transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer.
(6)
Costs of providing taped
proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the tape plus staff
time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to
recordings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be
set in the City’s schedule of fees and charges each year.
Retention of Tapes
(7)
Recordings pertaining to the
proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the
Library Board of Western Australia Act (1951-83), General Disposal Authority
for Local Government Records. The current requirement for the retention of
recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(8)
This policy shall be printed
within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special
Electors and the Audit Committee meetings to advise the public that the
proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will
be held at the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road,
Wanneroo on Tuesday 06 May, 2008 commencing at 7.00pm.
C JOHNSON
Chief Executive Officer
01 May 2008
CONTENTS
Item 1 Attendances 1
Item 2 Apologies and Leave
of Absence 1
Item 3 Public Question Time 1
Item 4 Confirmation of
Minutes 1
OC01-05/08 Minutes
of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 08 April 2008 1
Item 5 Announcements by the
Mayor without Discussion 1
Item 6 Questions from
Elected Members 1
Item 7 Petitions 1
New Petitions Presented 1
Update on Petitions 1
PT01-04/08 Objection
to Two Storey Dwelling, Lot 842 Eastcliffe Street, Madeley 1
PT02-04/08 Requesting
Irrigation and Upgrade of Swanley Park, Marangaroo 2
PT03-04/08 Requesting
Repairs to Roundabout, Monet Drive, Ashby 2
PT04-04/08 Requesting
Development of Keith Griffith Park, Darch 2
Item 8 Reports 3
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including
the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be
completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer. 3
Planning and Development 3
Policies & Studies 3
PD01-05/08 Draft
Public Health Bill 3
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans 17
PD02-05/08 Close
of Advertising - Amendment No.1 to the Neerabup Industrial Area Agreed
Structure Plan No. 17 17
Development Applications 24
PD03-05/08 Application
for a Residential Outbuilding at Lot 17 (4) Weymouth Boulevard, Quinns Rocks 24
PD04-05/08 Proposed
Single House Development at Lot 346 (23) Swansea Promenade, Mindarie 31
PD05-05/08 Proposed
Residential Design Codes Variation - Single House Development - Lot 773 (14)
Asheville Parade, Landsdale 44
PD06-05/08 Proposed
Master Antenna Tv (MATV) and Broadband Fibre Compound - Lot 12 (2) Yandella
Promenade, Tapping 55
Delegated Authority Reports 66
PD07-05/08 Development
Applications Determined by Delegated Authority for March 2008 66
PD08-05/08 Subdivision
Applications Determined under Delegated Authority during March 2008 77
Infrastructure 88
IN01-05/08 Tender
08007 - The Construction of Ocean Reef Road Dual Carriageway Extension -
Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade, Wangara 88
IN02-05/08 Parking
Prohibitions - Venture Loop, Wangara 96
IN03-05/08 Amendment
to Supplementary Auslink Roads to Recovery Program Works Schedule 106
IN04-05/08 PT01-03/08:
Request for Parking Bays in Glensanda Way, Mindarie 110
IN05-05/08 Road
Upgrade - Rangeview Road/Landsdale Road, Landsdale 114
IN06-05/08 Upgrading
the Lubrication and Dispensing Systems in the Fleet Workshop 118
IN07-05/08 Wangara
Sump - Outcomes of Contaminated Site Assessment 121
Corporate Services 127
Finance 127
CS01-05/08 Warrant
of Payments - For the Period to 31 March 2008 127
CS02-05/08 Financial
Activity Statements for Period Ended 31 March 2008 181
Contracts and Property 189
CS03-05/08 Proposed
Sale of Proposed Lot 2 (Part Lot 4) Mather Drive, Neerabup 189
Community Development 195
Community Services 195
CD01-05/08 Review
of The City of Wanneroo Children’s Services 195
Leisure & Cultural Services 202
CD02-05/08 Future
Management of Kingsway Indoor Stadium 202
CD03-05/08 Usage
of Liddell Park for Silvers Circus 211
Ranger & Safety Services 215
CD04-05/08 Application
to Keep More than Two Dogs 215
CD05-05/08 Proposal
to Introduce a Restricted Fire Season Throughout the Year. 218
CD06-05/08 Regional
Partnership Agreement with the State Government - Community Safety and Crime
Prevention (Graffiti) 221
Governance and Strategy 230
Governance 230
GS01-05/08 Annual
Donation - Challenge Brass Band 230
GS02-05/08 Community
Funding Allocations March 2008 Round 232
GS03-05/08 Donation
Requests to be Considered by Council 238
GS04-05/08 Review
of Youth Reward & Recognition Policy 248
GS05-05/08 Standing
Orders Local Law Repeal and Adoption 259
GS06-05/08 Legal
Representation and Costs Indemnification Policy 301
Corporate Performance 312
GS07-05/08 Triannual Corporate Performance Report: 1
November 2007 - 29 February 2008 312
Chief Executive Office 333
General 333
CE01-05/08 Appointment
of Acting Chief Executive Officers 333
CE02-05/08 Donation
Requests Considered under the Delegated Authority of the Chief Executive
Officer 335
Item 9 Motions on Notice 338
MN01-05/08 Cr
B Treby/Cr I Goodenough – Prostitution Amendment Bill 2007 – Amendment to
District Planning Scheme 2 338
Item 10 Urgent Business 341
Item 11 Confidential 341
CR01-05/08 Recruitment
and Selection of the Chief Executive Officer 341
Item 12 Date of Next Meeting 341
The next Ordinary Councillors Briefing Session has
been scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday, 27 May 2008, to be held at the
Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo. 341
Item 13 Closure 341
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council
Meeting held on 08 April 2008 be confirmed.
New Petitions
Presented
Update on
Petitions
Cr Treby presented a petition with 13 signatures objecting
to the serious invasion of the privacy of their homes as a result of the
dwelling near completion at Lot 842 Eastcliffe Street, Madeley.
UPDATE
This matter is still ongoing and
being investigated with relevant representatives. A report will be presented
to the June Council Meeting.
Cr Treby presented a petition with 276
signatures requesting Council to provide capital funding to irrigate and
upgrade facilities at Swanley Park in Marangaroo.
UPDATE
This matter is currently being investigated and a report
will be presented to Council in due course.
Cr Blencowe presented a petition with 14 signatures
requesting Council to repair the entrance, gardens and roundabout of Monet
Drive in Ashby.
UPDATE
This matter is currently being investigated and a report
will be presented to Council in due course.
Mayor Kelly presented a petition with 70 signatures
requesting Council to develop Keith Griffith Park at the corner of Hellfire
Drive and Rampage Street in Darch.
UPDATE
The development of Keith
Griffiths Park has been included within the City's Draft Forward Capital Works
Program 2008/09 - 2012/13 for consideration. The park has been included
for consideration on the basis that it is currently ranked number three
priority on the City's Dray Parks Register, and has also been assessed by Administration
within other public open space planning strategies. Whilst Keith
Griffiths Park has been included within the draft capital works program it
should be noted that concept planning, in consultation with local residents,
will need to occur prior to any park development taking place. Upon
confirmation of the Draft Forward Capital Works Program 2008/09 -
2012/13, Administration will progress park concept planning to identify capital
funding requirements. The significant pressures on the City's Passive
Park Development Budget should also be acknowledged in combination with
Administration's ability to only complete 2/3 passive park developments each
financial year.
Declarations of Interest by
Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration
of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.
Planning and
Development
Policies &
Studies
File Ref: S21/0020V01
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Suha Ali
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 2
File Name: AA Draft Public Health Bill.doc This line will not
be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the Public Health Bill 2008.
Background
In September 2001, Cabinet agreed that the Health Act 1911
be replaced through a phased program of legislative development, involving a
Food Bill, an Infectious Diseases Bill and a Bill dealing with other core
public health matters.
A discussion paper on a New Public Health Act for Western
Australia was released in July 2005, resulting in the development of the Draft
Public Health Bill 2008. The Draft Bill is currently in the consultation stage
and is open for submissions.
The Draft Public Health Bill is a welcome change to the
prescriptive and sometimes unworkable Health Act 1911 (can be viewed at Draft Public Health Bill
{http://www.newpublichealthact.health.wa.gov.au/publication/docs/D08 (Exposure)
Public Health Bill 2008.pdf}).
Detail
The Draft Public Health Bill provides for a flexible risk
based approach in addressing public health risks. The framework allows for
substantial preventative measures to be taken and also introduces a suitable
infringement and penalty mechanism. This is seen to be a significant
improvement from the current Health Act 1911.
In order to move away from a prescriptive approach, the
Bill embraces the provision of statutory policies and regulations to assist in
its implementation.
The Bill comprises of 18 parts and these are addressed in Attachment
1. Attachment 2 is an additional submission form answering a number
of questions relating to the Bill.
Comment
Clearly, there are significant implications for the City in
relation to the implementation and administration of the Bill.
Whilst a transitional 2-year period is currently being
proposed by the Department of Health, it is unclear how smooth this
transitional period will be. The development, through appropriate consultative
channels with local government and other stakeholders, of policies, regulations
and other frameworks, will be pivotal in being able to carry out the various
functions and responsibilities laid out in the Bill. Such development will
need to be carried out in the near future, prior to the Act being in force.
The development of local public health plans will be
challenging for all local governments, including the City. The Department of
Health will need to take responsibility of assisting local governments in the
development and implementation of such plans. There will also be a need to
ensure that state government is not merely passing on responsibilities,
particularly in relation to preventative and monitoring public health programs,
to local governments.
Statutory Compliance
As an enforcement agency and public authority under the
Act, local government will need to comply with its various requirements.
It is envisaged that statutory policies and regulations
will assist local government in meeting its obligations.
Strategic Implications
A re-assessment and review of the City’s roles and
functions relating to all facets of public health, not just environmental
health, will need to be considered, upon implementation of the Bill. Following
the development of a local public health plan, there may be implications
setting alternate priorities in the City’s strategic plan.
Policy Implications
There may be policy implications, based on the outcome of
the local public health plan.
Financial Implications
There may be financial implications in the future in
determining appropriate resources in addressing public health risks within the
City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council AUTHORISES the Chief Executive
Officer to make a submission to the Department of Health as detailed in
Attachments 1 and 2.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Page
1 of 8
Draft Public
Health Bill 2008
Part 1 - Preliminary
- Objects
and Principles: The objects and principles in the Bill seem appropriate and
will assist in the ongoing implementation of the Act by providing guidance to
enforcement and other agencies, along with the Judiciary. However, it is felt
that the first object being “to promote public health and wellbeing and to
prevent disease, injury, disability and premature death” is somewhat
heavily optimistic and may not necessarily be practical. Notwithstanding, it
is acknowledged that the intent is to address matters in a proactive manner and
to facilitate preventative programs.
- Terms
used in the Act:
- Does
not clearly state jurisdictional boundaries, for instance, the term “premises”
may be considered to be all-inclusive, and raises the question of where
boundaries may end? Clarity is required to determine whether local government,
for example, will have jurisdiction for matters that occur within water bodies.
- The
term “public health”, defined as the “physical, mental and social
wellbeing of the community” requires clarification. Whilst the general
principle of the definition is accepted, it is questionable whether all three
aspects, that is, physical, mental and social wellbeing, need to be addressed
in order to assess if a matter is regarded to be a public health risk. It also
raises the question of who may be qualified to address all three aspects? In
addition, community is not defined which raises the issue as to what may be
regarded as a community. If a person is claiming their health is being
affected through an activity of a third party, does this mean that an
enforcement agency is unable to take control measures, as an individual is not
regarded as a community?
- It
is felt that the term “serious public health risk”, being “a public health
risk involving potential harm to public health that is irreversible, of a high
impact or on a wide scale”, requires amendment, as the wording of
irreversible is not clearly defined. Whilst the intent may be that it relates
to an incident where the consequence is unable to be altered, it may also
exclude incidents where harm may not be irreversible due to the placement of
control measures or physical change such as surgery.
- Binding
the Crown is strongly supported. However, the inclusion of indigenous
communities complying with the same standards as other communities may not be
practicable. It is recommended that policies concerning indigenous and other
special needs communities be developed, in consultation with relevant
stakeholders.
Part 2 - Administration
- It
is noted that, under s.13, the CEO (of the Department of Health) is able to
direct a local government to take measures that the CEO considers necessary to
prevent, control or abate a risk that is considered to be of significant harm
to public health.
- There
is a requirement for enforcement agencies, such as local government, to report
to the CEO of the Department of Health (DoH), “at the intervals that the CEO
requires, on the performance of functions under this Act by the agency and by
persons employed or engaged by the agency”. This is rather open and may
impact significantly on the resources of the local government. Any reporting
should be made at a reasonable interval, as it is seen that the reporting of
individual agencies to the DoH may be of benefit to better gauge state-wide
impact on public health issues. An annual report may be regarded as
reasonable.
- It is
also noted that local government will be required to forward to the CEO of the
DoH, details of any proceedings for an offence under the Act within one month
after proceedings have been finally dealt with.
- A
clear distinction from the current Health Act, is the designation of authorised
officers. Environmental Health Officers, for instance, are not specifically
determined to meet the criteria of an authorised officer under the Act. Whilst
there is a requirement for an enforcement agency, such a local government, to
have regard to any guidelines issued by the CEO of the DoH as to the
appropriate qualifications and experience for a person to be designated as an
authorised officer, the roles, functions, skills and experience of
Environmental Health Officers are not acknowledged in the Act. It is
anticipated and recommended that the CEO’s guidelines will make provisions for
Environmental Health Officers, who clearly have skills to deal with a
significant number of public health issues. It is acknowledged that
enforcement agencies will also have the need for those officers with varying
other skills to address a variety of public health issues (eg Community
Development Officers, Rangers, etc).
Part 3 – General Public Health Duty
- The
Bill places a responsibility for a person to “take all reasonable and
practicable steps to prevent or minimise any harm to public health that might
forseeably result from anything done or omitted to be done by the person”.
Whilst this provision allows for flexibility in the administration of the legislation,
it is too open. It is recommended that the DoH establish clear statutory
policies that may be applied in the administration of this clause.
Part 4 – Serious Public Health Risks and Material Public
Health Risks
- The
penalties provided in this provision are welcomed and seen to be an essential
tool in administering the legislation. It will overcome the frustrations being
experienced with the current Health Act 1911 where penalties are quite minimal
and not seen to be adequate in discouraging people from committing offences.
- The
Bill also proposes penalties for carrying on activities that may cause a public
health risk. This will be essential in allowing enforcement agencies the
ability to take preventative measures prior to an incident being a public
health issue.
Part 5 – Public Health Policies
- It
is considered that public health policies will provide an effective framework
for detailing requirements, standards, codes and strategies relating to the
objects of the Bill and providing for effective mechanisms in protecting the
public health of the community.
- However,
it should be stressed that, in order to ensure effective governance, the
Department of Health will need to ensure that a number of public health
policies are put in place during the transitional arrangements of the Act.
Part 6 – Public Health Plans
- The
development of State public health plans is highly supported. These state
plans will greatly assist local governments in the development of local health
plans.
- Local government will be required to
develop a local health plan which is to:
- identify
the public health needs of the local government district; and
- include
an examination of data relating to health status and health determinants in the
local government district; and
- establish
objectives and policy priorities for (i) the promotion and protection of public
health in the local government district; and (ii) the development and delivery
of public health services in the local government district; and
- identify
how, based on available evidence, the objectives and policy priorities…are
proposed to be achieved; and
- describe
how the local government proposes to work with the CEO and other bodies
undertaking public health initiatives, projects and programmes to achieve the
objectives and policy priorities…; and
- include
a strategic framework for the identification, evaluation and management of
public health risks in the local government district and any other matters
relating to public health risks in the local government district (i) that the
local government considers it appropriate to include in the plan; or (ii) that
are required to be included in the plan by the CEO, a public health policy or
the regulations; and
- include
a report, in accordance with any relevant public health policy, on the
performance by the local government of its functions under this Act.
- Whilst
the development of Environmental Health Plans (EHPs) is not a new concept to
local government, including the City of Wanneroo, the proposed local public
health plans will go beyond what EHPs have previously achieved. EHPs have
predominantly focussed solely on environmental health issues that have been
addressed by various subsidiary legislation made under the Health Act 1911.
They have traditionally captured matters associated with food and water safety,
public buildings, effluent disposal, large public events, skin penetration
premises, vermin and vector control, and the like. The proposed local public
health plans, however, will capture a greater spectrum of public health issues
and will require local government to perhaps consider public health issues that
may have previously been dealt with by state agencies or public health units.
It is unclear how local government will be able to access data “relating to
health status and health determinants in the local government district”,
along with being able to undertake a number of promotional programmes for
issues that have traditionally been undertaken by state government.
Clearly, the Department of Health
will need to take responsibility to establish guidelines as to what should be
captured in local public health plans as local governments should not be
expected to take on duties that should lie with state government, particularly
as the Bill does not indicate that resources will be provided to local
government to develop such plans.
- It
is concerning that the local public health plans are too inclusive and it is
unclear how extensive they need to be.
- The
Department of Health will need to provide public health data to local
government to assist in the development of local public health plans.
- The
requirement for public health plans to be reviewed each year is too onerous on
local government and inconsistent with other the review period for other plans
such as strategic plans, etc. It is proposed that a 5-year period is more
realistic, practical and achievable. It is envisaged that the plan will be
treated as a living document that is open for constant review during this period.
- The
requirement for local public health plans to be replaced 3 years after it was
prepared is unrealistic, impractical and onerous on local government. A more
realistic period would be 5 years, which will be consistent with local
government strategic plans.
Part 7 – Public Health Assessments
- A
new element in public health legislation is the introduction of public health
assessments. This is long overdue in Western Australia and is strongly
supported. It is envisaged that the process will generally fall under the
current Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. However, there should
also be a mechanism in place that requires public health assessments for
proposals that may not necessarily require an EIA.
- Local
Governments should be able to recommend to the CEO of the DoH that a public
health assessment is needed.
- It
is supported that the Department of Health be the agency to which public health
assessments are referred.
- In
relation to s.46, the CEO should seek to consult with the relevant local
government authority prior to making recommendations to the decision making
authority.
Part 8 – Registration and Licensing
- The
provisions relating to registration and licensing, particularly in terms of the
local government being able to set its own fees under the provisions of the
Local Government Act, is supported.
- The
mechanism for registration and licensing through declaration of a public health
risk activity that is registrable and/or licensable in either regulation or a
public health policy is supported.
- It
is anticipated that local government will be consulted in the creation of such
policy or regulation.
- The
appropriate enforcement agency needs to be clearly defined in the public health
policy or regulation.
Part 9 – Notifiable Diseases
- The
role of local government is not clearly addressed in this part of the Bill.
There is a concern in relation to food borne diseases whereby the current
practice is for local government, who is responsible for ensuring food safety
is maintained at food premises, generally investigate incidence of food borne
illnesses. This is particularly advantageous as it allows the local government
to investigate potential causes in a timely manner and to take action if it is
suspected that a premise within its jurisdiction is potentially responsible for
the illness.
Part 10 - Serious Public Health Incident Powers
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported.
Part 11 – Public Health Emergencies
- The
provisions relating to the part are generally supported, however, there may be
significant local government resource implications with regard to s.105, with
the CEO of the DoH directing local government to assist in the development and
implementation of a public health emergency plan.
Part 12 – Compensation and Insurance
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported.
Part 13 – Improvement Notices and Enforcement Orders
- The
provisions relating to the issuance of improvement notices and enforcement
orders are supported, however, some provisions need to be amended/addressed.
- s.140(1) states:
- If
an authorised officer is satisfied, after carrying out an appropriate
inspection, that an improvement notice has been complied with, the officer is
to give the person given the improvement notice a notice of compliance.
- This
is highly problematic and impractical, as it specifically requires for an
inspection to be carried out by that authorised officer. There may be many
instances where this may not be achievable or necessary. For example, an
authorised officer may be satisfied that an improvement notice has been
complied with by receipt of a compliance certificate from a suitably qualified
person (whose services may have been contracted by the person on whom the
improvement notice was issued). Another example may be that another officer
may carry out an inspection, rather than the authorised officer that is able to
issue a notice of compliance.
- As
such, it is recommended that the wording be amended to remove after carrying
out an appropriate inspection.
- Similarly, s.140(3) states:
- If
an authorised officer is not satisfied, after carrying out an appropriate
inspection, that the improvement notice has been complied with, the officer is
to give the person given the improvement notice setting out the reasons why
the officer is not satisfied.
- For
reasons stated above, it is recommended that the wording be amended to remove after
carrying out an appropriate inspection.
- Similarly, s.144(1) states:
- The
enforcement agency that gave an enforcement order to a person is to give a
certificate of clearance to the person if the enforcement agency finds, by the
enforcement agency’s own inspection or the report of an authorised officers
inspection that (a) the person has complied with the order and any improvement
notice given to the person; and (b) if applicable, there is no longer a serious
public health risk to be prevented or mitigated.
- For
reasons stated above, along with the foreseeable possibility that a local government
(or any other enforcement agency for that matter) may employ the services of a
suitably qualified consultant to investigate an incident, it is recommended
that the wording of this clause be amended to remove the requirement for the
enforcement agency to carry out an inspection.
- s.145
allows for a person “at any time after an enforcement order has been given
to the person, make a written request to the enforcement agency that gave the
order to make an inspection”. s.145(2) further states that “through no
fault of the person who made the request the inspection is not conducted within
the period of 48 hours after the receipt of the request by the enforcement
agency, a certificate of clearance is to be taken to have been given to the
person”.
- There are a number of elements
that should not be supported by the City.
- The
48 hour period is impractical and possibly unachievable. For example, if a
person were to submit a written request to the local government on a Friday
evening, say 6pm, by facsimile, can it be taken that receipt of the request has
been made if the sending of the facsimile was successful? If so, then it is
considered that a certificate of clearance has been given to the person by
Sunday evening, prior to an authorised officer receiving such a request on
(assumingly) Monday morning on the basis that, generally, incoming mail is not
processed outside normal business hours. And what would the consequences to
the community be, particularly if Monday were a public holiday?
- As
such, clarification is sought in relation to what is deemed to be “receipt” of
a request.
- Also,
the 48 hour clause should clearly be removed and replaced with within two
working days. It is agreed that attending to such a request should be a
high priority, as such, two working days is practicable, realistic and just.
Part 14 – Inquiries
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported.
Part 15 – Powers of Entry, Inspection and Seizure
- The
provisions relating to this part are generally supported, however, a number of
clarifications are sought.
- s.161
states, “an authorised officer exercising a power under section 160 may be
assisted by a police officer or other person”.
- Clarification
is sought as to whether the police officer or other person will have the powers
of the authorised person at that time. This may be needed in assisting the
authorised person with examining any matter and requesting information etc.
- Clarification
is sought in relation to s.167(1) which states, “a warrant may be executed
only by the authorised officer to whom it was issued”. It would be
preferable if the enforcement agency, or any representative or authorised
officer of the enforcement agency may execute the warrant, rather than one
specific authorised person.
Part 16 – Infringement Notices
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported.
Part 17 – Procedural and Evidentiary Provisions
- s.195(1)
states “proceedings for an offence under this Act may be instituted by the
CEO or by an authorised officer authorised in writing by the CEO”.
- This clause is not supported.
- The
clause can only be supported if local government, and other enforcement
agencies, were able to institute proceedings for offences.
Part 18 – Miscellaneous
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported
Schedule 1 – Matters For Which Regulations May be Made
- The provisions relating to this part are
supported.
Other Matters Not Included In Public Health Bill 2008
- Immunisation:
The City of Wanneroo currently provides
an immunisation service. The Health Act 1911 allows for local government to
provide an immunisation service. It is anticipated that this service should
continue through an appropriate mechanism.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
ATTACHMENT
2
Page
1 of 3
Submission Form
1. Are the draft principles and objects
appropriate?
Yes
- The objects and principles in the Bill seem appropriate and will assist in
the ongoing implementation of Act by providing guidance to enforcement and
other agencies along with the Judiciary. However, it is felt that the first
object being “to promote public health and wellbeing and to prevent disease,
injury, disability and premature death” is somewhat heavily optimistic and
may not necessarily be practical. Notwithstanding, it is acknowledged that the
intent is to address matters in a proactive manner and to facilitate
preventative programs.
2. Will
public health policies provide an effective framework for detailing
requirements and standards relating to the objects of the Act and effectively
protecting and promoting the health of Western Australians?
Yes
- It is considered that public health policies will provide an effective
framework for detailing requirements, standards, codes and strategies relating
to the objects of the Act and providing for effective mechanisms in protecting
the public health of the community.
However,
it should be stressed that, in order to ensure effective governance, the
Department of Health will need to ensure that a number of public health
policies are put in place during the transitional arrangements of the Act, and
that appropriate consultation with relevant stakeholders is carried out.
3. Is
the scheme for registration and licensing adequate for the effective
identification and control of activities that pose a risk to public health?
Yes
- The provisions relating to registration and licensing, particularly in terms
of the local government being able to set its own fees under the provisions of
the Local Government Act, is supported.
The
mechanism for registration and licensing through declaration of a public health
risk activity that is registrable and/or licensable in either regulation or a
public health policy is supported.
It
is anticipated that local government will be consulted in the creation of such
policy or regulation.
The
appropriate enforcement agency needs to be clearly defined in the public health
policy or regulation.
4. Does
this part relating to Notifiable diseases provide sufficient balance in
protecting public health and ensuring individual rights?
Yes
– However, the role of local government is not clearly addressed in this part
of the Bill. There is a concern in relation to food borne diseases whereby the
current practice is for local government, who is responsible for ensuring food
safety is maintained at food premises, generally investigate incidence of food
borne illnesses. This is particularly advantageous as it allows the local
government to investigate potential causes in a timely manner and to take
action if it is suspected that a premise within its jurisdiction is potentially
responsible for the illness.
5. Do
the provisions provide the necessary legislative tools to effectively plan
against and respond to public health emergencies?
Yes,
however, there may be significant local government resource implications with
regard to s.105, with the CEO of the DoH directing local government to assist
in the development and implementation of a public health emergency plan.
However, the provisions are generally supported.
6. Do these provisions provide a fair process for
compensation and insurance?
Yes.
7. Do
these provisions provide an effective framework for public health assessment on
identified proposals?
Yes
– such a framework is long overdue in Western Australia and is strongly
supported. It is envisaged that the process will generally fall under the
current Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. However, there should
also be a mechanism in place that requires public health assessments for
proposals that may not necessarily require an EIA.
Local
Governments should be able to recommend to the CEO that a public health
assessment is needed
It
is supported that the Department of Health be the agency to which public health
assessments are referred.
In
relation to s.46, the CEO should seek to consult with the relevant local
government authority prior to making recommendations to the decision making
authority.
8. Are
the powers of authorised officers adequate for protecting public health bearing
in mind the principles to be applied at the beginning of the Bill (such as
principle of proportionality)?
Yes
- the provisions relating to this part are generally supported, however, a
number of clarifications are sought.
s.161
states, “an authorised officer exercising a power under section 160 may be
assisted by a police officer or other person”. Clarification is sought as
to whether the police officer or other person will have the powers of the
authorised person at that time. This may be needed in assisting the authorised
person with examining any matter and requesting information etc.
Clarification
is also sought in relation to s.167(1) which states, “a warrant may be
executed only by the authorised officer to whom it was issued”. It would
be preferable if the enforcement agency, or any representative or authorised
officer of the enforcement agency may execute the warrant, rather than one specific
authorised person.
9. Does
the proposed scheme of improvement notices and enforcement orders provide
effective mechanisms to prevent and mitigate risks to public health?
Yes.
10. Do
these provisions provide and adequate framework for the administration of the
Bill?
Yes
- with the exception of s. 195(1) which states “proceedings for an
offence under this Act may be instituted by the CEO or by an authorised officer
authorised in writing by the CEO”. This clause is not supported as it does
not provide for local government, and other enforcement agencies, to initiate
legal proceedings.
11. Do
the inquiry powers provide effective investigation and reporting arrangements
in relation to matters that might be the basis of a public health inquiry?
Yes.
12. Does
the Bill provide the appropriate tools to prevent risks to public health?
Yes
– particularly with the introduction of statutory and non-statutory policies,
the tools provided are risk based, allowing flexibility in addressing
contemporary public health risks – a significant improvement from the current
Health Act 1911.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Town Planning
Schemes and Structure Plans
File Ref: SP/00015/01,
SP/0015/02
File Name: BA Adoption of Amendments 1 2 to the
Neerabup Inudstrial Area Agreed Structure Plan No 17 Omnibus Amendment No 3A
.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil.
Author: Aiton Sheppard
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the public submissions and adoption of
Amendment No.1 to the Neerabup Industrial Area Agreed Structure Plan No.17
(ASP).
|
Applicant
|
Taylor Burrell Barnett on behalf of Landcorp.
|
|
Owner
|
Various
|
|
Location
|
Neerabup Industrial Area
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Industrial Development Zone and
General Industrial Zone.
|
Background
The ASP includes the Final Surface Contour Plan (FSCP),
which identifies the finished contour levels to provide a basic framework to
accommodate extraction of limestone resources in Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA)
and for the coordination of ultimate ground levels for future subdivision and
development. Attachment 1 contains a copy of the ASP.
As per this FSCP it was revealed that 19 million cubic
metres of excess non-commercial earth would be required to be removed from the
site at an estimated cost of $200million resulting in the NIA project likely to
becoming unfeasible. The applicant has therefore reviewed the FSCP and has
requested an amendment to the ASP in consultation with the City, considering
the following matters:
·
Maintain grades suitable for industrial development;
·
Provide suitable level changes between property boundaries;
·
Provide scope for sites to be independent in achieving levels
through cut and fill balance;
·
Enable suitable grades and direction for drainage and wastewater
services; and
·
Coordinate the new levels into existing roads and proposed roads.
The amended FSCP depicting the current and amended final
contour levels is illustrated in Attachment 2. A copy of a larger plan
is placed in the Elected Member’s Reading Room.
On 1 February 2008 the Acting Director Planning and
Development, under delegated authority from Council, considered the amendment
proposal as part of Omnibus Amendment No.3A to various ASPs and resolved to
advertise it for a period of 21 days (refer Powerdocs. No.665321). This
Amendment will replace the current FSCP with the amended Plan.
Detail
The proposed amendment does not affect the currently
proposed finished contour levels of Lot 21 under the ownership of Cockburn
Cements Limited (CCL), as they were reluctant to any change in levels. The
amendment, therefore, only relates to the remaining ASP area.
The revised finished contour levels will result in less
excavation, particularly on Lots 4 and 22 where the Meridian Park industrial
lots will be created through a joint venture between the City and LandCorp.
The amended finished contour levels will be higher than those originally
proposed in ASP 17 between 2 and 16 metres.
The amended contour levels coordinate with the design
levels of Flynn Drive.
Consultation
The amendment was advertised by way of two on-site signs,
an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times and on the City’s website and letters to
all landowners in the ASP area. The submission period closed on 11 March, 2008,
and three submissions were received, from the Department of Industry and
Resources (DOIR), CCL and the applicant respectively. While DOIR and CCL have
raised some concerns about the proposal, the applicant supplemented additional
information to the proposals.
Smart Growth Strategy
The proposal satisfies the City’s Smart Growth Strategy’s Principles
5.2 – Effective Use of Land and Infrastructure, and 5.5 - Long Term Economic
Health.
Comment
A. Response to the Submissions
The main issues raised by the submissions, together with a
comment on each are outlined below.
Issue 1 - Priority Resource Location
Lot 21 and the northern portion of Lot 22 are Priority
Resource Locations for future basic raw materials extraction.
Comment
The DOIR has advised that LandCorp should be encouraged to
ensure maximum extraction of Limestone within the northern portion of Lot 22
since the south-eastern section of Lot 22 contains lower grade limestone that
has been deemed uneconomic to extract. The applicant has advised that LandCorp
would undertake some limestone extraction in the northern portion of Lot 22
prior to subdivision and fill the extracted land to the proposed finished
contour levels. In this regard it is recommended that no further subdivision be
supported in respect to the northern portion of Lot 22 until such time
limestone extraction is undertaken to the satisfaction of the DOIR.
Recommendation
That the issue be noted.
Issue 2 - Major Cement (Clinker) Plant
CCL possibly
establishing a major Cement Plant on Lot 21 with a life span of about 50 years.
Comment
CCL is the sole manufacturer of clinker in WA. If a
significant limestone resource is not available for clinker production in close
proximity to the metropolitan area, the cost of manufacturing clinker in WA
will be prohibitive, and the State loses a significant manufacturing industry.
The Environmental Protection Authority’s recommended buffers are 1000 to 2000
metres from a cement manufacturing plant (depending on the size) to sensitive
land uses, such as those being proposed in Meridian Park.
In this regard it is noted that the NIA when developed is
expected to provide about 20,000 jobs. Given the extent of land required for
the Cement Plant and the recommended buffer, such a proposal will result in NIA
not providing the estimated jobs.
Lot 21 is zoned General Industrial Zone in the ASP wherein
under the provisions of the DPS2, the use class “Industry-Hazardous” is a
Discretionary Use. Hence when a development application is submitted for the
Cement Plan, it will be considered by the City based on its merits and the
objectives of the ASP and the City’s Employment Policy.
Recommendation
That the issue be noted.
B. Other issues
Co-ordination of Levels with Lot 21
CCL does not object to the amended FSCP provided the
originally proposed contour levels within Lot 21 are not affected. LandCorp has
advised CCL that its future development will not be affected by the changes. In
this regard the proposed levels within Lot 22 will need to be amended to accommodate
servicing to the original levels of Lot 21.
Attachment 3 depicts the subdivision plan approved
by the Western Australian Planning Commission for the southern portion of Lot
22. As per this plan, a north-south service road and some east-west roads are
proposed. Some proposed industrial lots are likely to gain access from these
roads. This subdivision plan also depicts the finished contour levels and the
3-metre batter as shown in the amended FSCP. Since the proposed batter may not
facilitate coordination between Lots 21 and 22, it is recommended that the FSCP
be modified accordingly within Lot 22. It is also recommended that the
modified FSCP depict the contour levels of the existing topography of the land
in order to assess the amount of cut and fill required for the
subdivision/development.
Statutory Compliance
The structure plan amendment has followed the procedures
outlined in Part 9 of District Planning Scheme No.2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following Outcome Objective of
the Strategic Plan for 2006 to 2021:
“3.1 Increase availability of serviced industrial
land”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.1 (b) of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2
RESOLVES that Amendment No 1 to the Neerabup Industrial Area Agreed Structure
Plan No 17, as submitted by Taylor Burrell Barnett on behalf of LandCorp, is
satisfactory subject to the following modification being undertaken:
a) Modifying
the Finished Surface Contour Levels along the western boundary of Lot 22 to
facilitate coordination between Lots 21 and 22 and depicting the contour levels
of the topography of the Neerabup Industrial Area to the satisfaction of the
City of Wanneroo.
2. Upon
receipt of the structure plan documents modified in accordance with (1) above,
SUBMITS three copies to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its
adoption and certification.
3. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No.2 ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS
Amendment No. 1 to the Neerabup Industrial Area Agreed Structure Plan once
certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission.
4. ENDORSES
the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on the
structure plan amendments, for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be
forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the
submittors of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Development
Applications
File Ref: P27/2076V01
File Name: EA Application for a residential
outbuilding at lot 17 4 Weymouth Boulevard.doc This line will not be printed
Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Karen Evans
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider an application for the development of a
residential outbuilding at 4 Weymouth Boulevard, Quinns Rocks.
|
Applicant
|
Dennis Kelly
|
|
Owner
|
Dennis Kelly
|
|
Location
|
Lot 17 (4) Weymouth Boulevard, Quinns Rocks
|
|
Site Area
|
0.0734 ha
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Residential
|
Background
An application for a residential outbuilding at 4 Weymouth
Boulevard, Quinns Rocks was submitted to the City on 6 December 2007. Amended
plans were submitted to the City on 12 February 2008. The subject property is
located 17.0metres east of the intersection of Weymouth Boulevard and Ocean
Beach Drive (refer to Location Map, Attachment 1).
Detail
The amended application proposes the construction of a
70.96sqm outbuilding to the rear of an existing two storey dwelling with a
100mm rear setback and 1248 and 1209mm side setbacks respectively (refer to
Site Plan, Attachment 2). The proposed wall and ridge heights are 2657
and 3981mm respectively. The building is proposed to be constructed in the
same materials as the dwelling comprising rendered brickwork and colorbond
roofing (refer to Elevations, Attachment 3).
The applicant is requesting variations to the acceptable
development provisions of the Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) as follows:
·
Building area larger than 60sqm
·
Wall height exceeding 2400mm
·
Rear setback of 100mm in lieu of the 1500mm required
The lot is zoned ‘Residential’ under District Planning
Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) with a density Code of R20. The development of an
outbuilding is a permitted use in this zone.
Consultation
The applicant requested comments from the adjoining
neighbours to his original proposal, with one of them objecting to it. The
amended plans were forwarded to this neighbour on 27 February 2008 and the City
received a submission objecting to the modified proposals.
Comment
Response to the Submission
The main issues raised in the submission, together with a
comment on each are outlined below:
Issue
1. Height
The objector stated that the proposed outbuilding is too
high.
Comments
The objector’s residence is located on a site, which is
1170mm above the natural ground level of the subject property. With a 1700mm
colorbond fence on top of the limestone retaining wall, the total height on the
boundary from the subject lot would be 2870mm. Considering this height, the
outbuilding with a proposed wall height of 2657mm is not likely to impact on
the objector’s residence. The proposed ridge height of 3981mm complies with
the R-Codes provisions, which is 4200mm.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 2 – Side Setback
The objector stated that the building would be an eyesore
if it were right up against the fence.
Comments
Being an outbuilding at the rear side of an existing
dwelling with a maximum ridge height less than 4200mm permissible in the
R-Codes, the proposal is not considered to be an eyesore.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported
Issue 3 – Size of the Outbuilding
The objector questioned the size of the outbuilding and
believes that the acceptable development provisions of the R-Codes should be
adhered to.
Comments
The applicant has advised that the proposed outbuilding is
to be used as a personal gymnasium, to secure leisure equipment, tools and
household goods and to provide a covered work area. The finishes of the
outbuilding to match the existing dwelling have been selected by the applicant
in order to eliminate any visual impact on adjoining neighbours.
The R-Codes permits Council to consider variations to the
Acceptable Development provisions (Clause 2.3) based on some Performance
Criteria. One of the Performance Criteria in regard to Outbuilding as per
Clause 3.10.1 of the R-Codes is as follows:
“Outbuildings that do not detract from the streetscape
or the visual amenity of residents or neighbouring properties.”
The proposed outbuilding will not be visible from Weymouth
Boulevard and over half of the rear wall of the proposed outbuilding will abut
an existing garage parapet wall. The proposal along with the existing dwelling
will result in 63% open space on the property, which exceeds the 50% required
as per the R-Codes. It is therefore considered that the proposal will not
produce any impact on the adjoining residence.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been processed in accordance with the
requirements of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006 – 2021:
“2.1 Increase quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle
options”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the application submitted
by Dennis Kelly for the proposed residential outbuilding on Lot 17 (4) Weymouth
Boulevard, Quinns Rocks, subject to the following conditions:
1. This
approval only relates to the proposed outbuilding as indicated on the approved
plans. It does not relate to any other development on the lot.
2. The
use of the outbuilding must remain ancillary to the residential use of the
property and not be used for commercial or industrial purposes, or for human
habitation.
3. All
stormwater shall be collected and retained on site.
4. Boundary
walls shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.
5. The
colours, design and materials of the proposed outbuilding shall compliment the
existing dwelling as indicated on the approved plans to the satisfaction of the
City of Wanneroo.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: P22/1463V01
File Name: EA Proposed single house development at
lot 346 23 Swansea Promenade Mindarie.doc This line will not be printed
Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Karen Evans
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider an application for a single house on Lot 346
(23) Swansea Promenade, Mindarie
|
Applicant
|
Nicholas Hicks
|
|
Owner
|
Nicholas Hicks and Katrina Hicks
|
|
Location
|
Lot 346 (23) Swansea Promenade, Mindarie
|
|
Site Area
|
0.0381 ha
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Marina Zone
|
Background
The subject property, located within the Mindarie Keys
Harbourside Village Agreed Structure Plan (ASP) area, is currently vacant. The
lots on either side contain a two-storey dwelling (refer to Location Map, Attachment
1). Access to the property, which is a laneway lot, can be gained only via
Mistley Lane located to the rear. A development application for the
proposed construction of a two-storey single house on the subject land was
submitted to the City on 26 March 2008 (refer to Site Plan, Attachment 2
and Elevations, Attachment 3). Being subject to the provisions of the
Detailed Area Plan (DAP) No.1 of the ASP, the applicant has requested some
variations to the DAP provisions. Additionally, the applicant has also
requested variations to some Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) provisions.
Detail
The variations to the DAP provisions are as follows:
·
Construction of a garage parapet wall on the eastern boundary in
lieu of the 1.0metre (m) setback required; and
·
Setback of 1.5m to the ground floor along the eastern boundary,
which is the designated solar boundary, in lieu of the 2.0m setback required.
The variations to the R-Codes provisions are as follows:
·
Setback of 800mm to the ground floor western boundary in lieu of
the 1.5m required;
·
Setback between 800 and 1800mm to the first floor western
boundary in lieu of the 3.8m required; and
·
First floor cone of vision into the adjoining western property.
In the ASP the lot is zoned ‘Residential Zone’ with a
density coding of R30. The use class ‘Single house’ is a permitted (‘P’) use in
this zone.
Consultation
The applicant requested comments from the adjoining
neighbours and the City received one submission.
Comment
Response to the Submission
The main issues raised by the submission, together with a
comment on each are outlined below:
Issue
1. Subsidence of existing retaining wall
The objector contends that the proposed nil set back to the
garage wall would result in the possible subsidence of the existing retaining
wall due to deep excavation along the wall supporting his dwelling and the
possibility of cracks appearing immediately or later to the parapet wall and
boundary brick fencing (refer to photograph in Attachment 4).
Comment
The proposal requires an excavation up to 930mm along the
base of an existing retaining and single storey boundary wall. The City’s
Building Services Unit has confirmed that the excavation and construction of
the retaining wall could be undertaken without compromising the structural
integrity of the adjoining retaining wall. In this regard the following
condition is recommended:
“The submission of a report from a practicing structural
engineer certifying that the proposed development will maintain the structural
integrity of the existing retaining wall, along with the building licence
application.”
In regard to the proposed “Nil” side set back for the
garage it is noted that while it does not comply with the requirements of the
DAP that requires a 1.0m setback, it does comply with the “Nil” side setback
requirement in the ASP and the R-Codes provisions in Clause 3.2, which allows a
boundary wall.
Recommendation
That the issue be addressed by including the
above-mentioned condition in the development approval.
Issue
2. Maintenance of parapet wall or brick fence.
Future maintenance of parapet wall or brick fence requiring
repair would not be possible.
Comment
As an acceptable development, Clause 3.3.2 of the R-Codes
relating to ‘Buildings on Boundary’, allows walls abutting an existing or
simultaneously constructed wall of similar or greater dimension. Maintenance
of such walls is possible from inside the residence.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 3. Possibility of high noise
disturbance
Possibility of high noise disturbance from power tools used
in the adjoining garage.
Comment
Power tools are considered specified equipment and the use
is regulated by the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. However,
if there are any concerns of non-compliance, the objector could direct his
concerns to the City’s Health Services.
Recommendation
That the issue be noted.
Issue 4 Reduction of solar setback to 1.5m at
ground level in lieu of 2.0m
A solar setback of 2.0m should be maintained at least to a
distance of 5.0m from the front boundary in order to avoid the loss of sunlight
to their existing front garden sitting area.
Comment
The proposal provides a ground floor setback of 1.5m and an
upper floor setback of 2.0m to the eastern boundary, which is a designated
solar setback as per the DAP. The front garden sitting area of the objector’s
lot to the east has a ground level of 11.31m, which is one metre higher than
the proposed finished ground floor level of the subject property. The second
storey balcony and ground floor portico area of the objector’s dwelling is
setback 3.0m from the front boundary, whereas the front setback of the proposed
dwelling is 3.8m. Consequently, there would be little impact on the provision
of sunlight to the front garden sitting area of the objector’s residence.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 5 Adjoining property will
assume a semi detached appearance to the rear
The objector is concerned that his property will appear
connected to the subject property through a boundary wall constructed against
the existing parapet wall.
Comment
The objector’s dwelling is well elevated above the subject
lot. The staggered setbacks and the height difference would provide adequate
definition of the two properties.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 6 Adherence to guidelines should be held
firm to all parties
The Site Guidelines imposed by Mirvac Fini (developer) for
each lot and the Residential Plan for ‘The Wharf’ have been signed and accepted
by the purchaser of the lots. Hence departure from these guidelines is
unnecessary.
Comments
Mirvac’s ‘Wharf Design Committee’ has approved the proposal
as submitted, offering no objections to the variations from the DAP or the
R-Codes subject to the City’s confirmation. The City considers the Wharf
Design Committee’s endorsement of a building design as ‘supporting advice’ when
assessing applications. Clause 3.4.2 of the ASP indicates that the DAP shall guide
residential development. Variations to the DAP are assessed by the City based
on their merits.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
General Comments
DAP Variations
Considering the matters discussed above it is recommended
that the following variations to the DAP be approved.
·
Construction of a garage parapet wall on the eastern boundary in
lieu of the 1.0m setback required; and
·
Setback of 1.5m to the ground floor along the eastern boundary in
lieu of the 2.0m setback required.
R–Codes variation
As regards the variations to the R-Codes in relation to
reduced setback and cone of vision, it is noted that the owner of the adjoining
property to the west has provided his consent to these variations. As such,
the following variations are supported.
·
Setback of 800mm to the ground floor western boundary in lieu of
the 1.5m required;
·
Setback between 800 and 1800mm to the first floor western
boundary in lieu of the 3.8m required; and
·
First floor cone of vision into the adjoining western property.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been processed in accordance with the
requirements of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following Outcome Objective of
the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006 – 2021:
“2.1 Increase quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle
options.”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the variations to the
Detailed Area Plan No.1 of the Mindarie Harbourside Village Agreed Structure
Plan and the variations to the provisions of the Residential Design Codes requested
by Nicholas Hicks in respect to the development application for the proposed
construction of a Single House on Lot 346 (23) Swansea Promenade, Mindarie, as
depicted in Attachments 2 and 3 of this report subject to the following
conditions:-
1. The
submission of a report from a practicing structural engineer certifying that
the development will not compromise the structural integrity of the existing
retaining wall, along with the building licence application;
2. All
fencing shall be installed in accordance with the City’s Local Laws;
3. All
stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to
the City;
4. The
private yard areas shall be nominated and suitably screened from adjoining
dwellings and the street to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo;
5. The
driveways and crossover shall be designed and constructed to the residential
specifications to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo;
6. Walls
on the boundary shall be finished or rendered to match where practicable the
colours and materials of the affected property to the satisfaction of the City
of Wanneroo;
7. Provision
of a bin pad measuring no less than 1 metre in depth by 2.4 metres in width and
free of all projections, including eaves, below a height of 4m within the
property abutting the laneway to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo; and
8. Retaining
walls are to be provided where the angle of natural repose of the soil cannot
be maintained. Drawn details signed by a practicing Structural Engineer must be
submitted for approval.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: P17/0484V01
File Name: EA Proposed Single House development
Lot 773 14 Asheville Parade Landsdale.doc This line will not be printed
Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Mark Donnelly
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 5
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider a retrospective Residential Design Codes (RD
Codes) variations to a single house development at Lot 773 (14) Asheville
Parade, Landsdale.
|
Applicant
|
E & I Osmanovski
|
|
Owner
|
E & I Osmanovski
|
|
Location
|
Lot 773 (14) Asheville Parade, Landsdale
|
|
Site Area
|
633 m2
|
|
DPS2 Zoning
|
Residential
|
Background
On 26 March 2007, the City received a building licence
application from the applicant for the proposed construction of a Single House
on the subject land. Attachment 1 contains the site map, and Attachments
2 and 3 contain the floor plan and elevation of the dwelling
respectively. The site is zoned Residential Zone in the City of Wanneroo
District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2) with a density coding of R20. Hence, the
provisions of the RD Codes for R20 will apply in this instance.
Since the proposal did not comply with the provisions of
the RD Codes relating to site coverage, front setback of the garage and the
dwelling, and with the City’s policy on “Establishing Building Pad Levels,
Excavation, Fill and Retaining Associated with Residential Development”,
the applicant was requested to justify these variations in writing. On 9 May
2007 the City approved the Building Licence for the plans as submitted by the
applicant without the above being addressed.
Having received the Building Licence, the applicant
commenced construction of the dwelling. without taking into consideration the
concerns the City had with respect to the variations. The approved building
plan depicted the proposed residence at a Reduced Level (RL) at 11.3 metres
(m), while the existing finished floor level (FFL) of the dwellings on either
side of the site were at 10.5 and 11.0m respectively.
The City received complaints from the adjoining neighbours
to the effect that the applicant was progressing with the construction work and
had laid the concrete floor slab. Attachment 4 contains the photos of
the site depicting the concrete floor slab and its impact on the adjoining
houses.
On 1 November 2007, the applicant was served with a
stop-work notice and a Town Planning and Development Act Direction to remove
the as constructed works.
Subsequently, the applicant requested the City’s
retrospective approval of the aforementioned variations to the RD Codes and the
City’s policy.
Detail
The variations requested by the applicant and his
justification are as follows:
1. Greater than 50% site coverage
The RD Codes prescribe maximum 50% site coverage for R20
lots but the applicant has requested for 55.79% coverage to accommodate the
growing needs of his family, which requires large rooms.
2. Lesser Garage front setback
The RD Codes require a minimum of 4.5m front setback for
garage. The applicant has proposed a front setback varying between 4.410 and
4.5m.
3. Lesser front setback of the dwelling
The front setback of the proposal does not average 6.0m as
per the provisions of the RD Codes. The applicant has cited a larger house to
meet his family needs as the reason for reducing the front setback.
4. Greater than 0.3m average fill
The City’s Policy indicates “the importation of fill to
increase the building pad level shall generally be limited to no more than 0.3m
above the average building pad level of the site.” The applicant however
has advised that the fill amounted to 0.475m above the average building pad
level of the site and that the contractor had made an honest mistake. The
applicant’s contractors have advised that the owner will supply any retaining
walls and new fences on the boundary to rectify this mistake. The applicant
has advised that he will comply with this in lieu of removing the concrete
slab.
Consultation
The City wrote to the adjoining five neighbours requesting
comments on the development proposal. In response, the City received four
submissions objecting to the proposal.
Comment
A. Response to the Submissions
The main issues raised by the submissions, together with a
comment on each is outlined below:
Issue 1 - Loss of Privacy
The dwelling proposed to be built on a higher level will
impact on the privacy of the surrounding houses.
Comment
The City surveyed the FFL of the constructed pad level to
be at 11.49 metres, refer Attachment 5. As a result, the FFL of this
slab will be 0.990 and 0.490m higher than the FFL of the respective adjoining
residences. Consequently, the proposed dwelling when constructed will impact
on the privacy of the surrounding residences.
Recommendation
That the issue be upheld.
Issue 2 – Tower over adjoining houses
The proposed dwelling will tower over the surrounding
houses and would look odd and out of place.
Comment
Since the subject dwelling is proposed to be built higher
than the surrounding houses, it would be out of place in the neighbourhood.
Recommendation
That the issue be upheld.
Issue 3 – Fence blocking the natural light
Fence erected around the proposed dwelling will block the
light.
Comment
As indicated by one of the submittors residing on the
southern side of the subject land, any fence of the development would block
light into this residence.
Recommendation
That the issue be upheld.
Issue 4 – Reduced front setback of the garage
The reduced front setback of the garage could affect the
sight lines.
Comment
The RD Codes prescribe a front setback of 4.5m for garage.
The proposed front setback varies between 4.41 and 4.5m. Since this variation
would neither affect the streetscape nor the traffic movement, it is considered
to be acceptable.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
B. Proposed variations
RD Codes
1. Greater than 50% site coverage:
The RD Codes make provision for a minimum of 50% open space
around buildings in R20 coded areas. This open space is required to complement
the building and to allow attractive streetscapes. As a result of this open
space requirement, the RD Codes allow a maximum site coverage of 50%. All the
adjoining dwellings having been constructed with 50% site coverage, a coverage
of 55.79% is not supported. Furthermore, by allowing a greater site coverage,
it would set an undesirable precedent.
2. Lesser Garage front setback
The applicant has proposed a varying setback of between
4.41 and 4.5m. This slight variation is recommended as it would neither affect
the streetscape nor the sight lines.
3. Lesser front setback of the dwelling
The RD Codes prescribe an average front setback of 6.0m but
the subject proposal averages to 5.5m. Since this variation would not affect
the streetscape, it is considered appropriate.
4. Greater than 0.3m average fill
As per the City’s policy, the
additional fill shall not be more than 0.3m above the average building pad
level of the site. The average pad level of the site is 10.778 metres,
therefore the increased pad level should have been at 11.078m. The pad has
been constructed at 11.490.
As previously mentioned, a
building licence was issued by the City indicating the pad level at a level of
11.300m. Adding the normal thickness of 0.1m for the concrete slab, the FFL
should have been at a maximum of 11.400m. The applicant however has built the
slab at 11.490m, 0.190 mm higher than approved, refer Attachment 5.
A dwelling constructed at a FFL of 11.490m would impact on
the privacy of the adjoining dwellings. Sub section 3.8.1 of the RD Codes make
the following provisions on visual privacy:
“Major openings to active habitable spaces or their
equivalent which have a floor level more than 0.5m above natural ground level
and positioned so as to overlook any part of any other residential property
behind its street setback line, to comply with at least one of the following:
i) are
setback in direct line of sight within the cone of vision from the boundary a
minimum of:
·
4.5 metres in the case of bedrooms;
·
6.0 metres in the case of habitable rooms other than bedrooms;
and
·
7.5 metres in the case of unenclosed outdoor active habitable spaces
(balconies, decks, verandahs and the like); or
ii) are
provided with permanent vertical screening to restrict view within the cone of
vision from any major opening of an active habitable space; or
iii) are
provided with permanent horizontal screening or equivalent, preventing direct
line of sight within the cone of vision to ground level of the adjoining
property if closer than 25m to the opening or equivalent.”
The proposed side setbacks of the subject dwelling are
1.719 and 1.5m respectively. The 1.719m setback relates to a habitable room
(meals room) and the 1.5m setback relates to bedrooms, refer Attachment 2.
As per the above-mentioned RD Codes provisions, these rooms should have been
either setback at 6.0 and 4.5m respectively, or provided with permanent
vertical/horizontal screening. Since the proposal does not comply with these
RD Codes provisions, the variation to the excessive fill is not supported.
C. Discussions
Given that the City had issued the building licence as per
the plans submitted by the applicant, the following matters are noted:
Under subclause 6.1.3 of the DPS2, “except in the case
of Marina Zone, the Centre Zone, the Urban Development Zone, the Industrial
Development Zone and the Rural Community Zone in respect of land for which no
Agreed Structure Plan is in place, the Council’s prior Planning Approval on
land zoned by the Scheme is not required if the development consists of:
(b) the
erection of a single house which will be the only building on that lot and
where a dwelling is a permitted (“P”) use in the zone…….
Notwithstanding that a single
house may not otherwise require the prior approval of the Council pursuant to
the Scheme, any person who wishes to carry out development of a single house
involving the exercise of discretion by the Council ………. shall at the time of
lodging an application for a Building Licence or earlier, apply in writing to
Council, seeking Council’s approval.”
Following the City’s preliminary assessment of the
application, the applicant was requested to seek the City’s approval of the
proposed variations. Although the City issued the Building Licence, the
applicant should have still sought the approval of the City on the proposed
variations. The applicant however failed to do so.
Bruce Havilah & Associates, Barristers and Solicitors,
representing the applicant have advised the City that notwithstanding the
applicant’s departure from the approved plans in respect of the FFL, he is not
in a financial position to re-do the concrete floor slab and that he is open to
discussions.
Considering that the RD Codes variation to the front
setback provisions relating to the dwelling and the garage are acceptable, the
RD Codes variation to the site coverage provision and the variation to the
City’s policy in regard to the fill are not supported for the following
reasons:
1. Approval
of these variations would affect the amenity of the neighbourhood and
particularly of the adjoining neighbours; and
2. Approval
of these variations would set an undesirable precedent.
Statutory Compliance
The Building Application is being considered under the
provisions of the DPS2, the RD Codes and the Building Codes of Australia.
Strategic Implications
The proposal requires satisfying the following Outcome
Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006 –2021:
“2.1 Increase quality of neighbourhood”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the proposed variation to the Residential Design Codes provisions in regard to
the front setback of the dwelling and the garage requested by the applicant, E
Osmanovski, in respect of the proposed Single House on Lot 773 (14) Ashville
Parade, Landsdale, as depicted on Attachment 1 of this report;
2. DOES
NOT APPROVE the proposed variation to the Residential Design Codes provision in
respect to the site coverage and the City’s policy on “Establishing Building
Pad Levels, Excavation, Fill and Retaining Associated with Residential
Development” in respect to the fill requested by the applicant E Osmanovski
in respect to the proposed construction of a Single House on Lot 773 (14)
Ashville Parade, Landsdale for the following reasons:
a) Approval
of the variations would affect the amenity of the neighbourhood and
particularly of the adjoining neighbours;
b) Approval
of the variations would set an undesirable precedent.
3. REQUIRES
the removal of the part of the development already carried out within 60 days
and restore the land as nearly as practicable to the condition it was in
immediately before development was commenced.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: P31/1028V01
(DA06/0060)
File Name: EA Proposed Master Antenna TV MATV and
Broadband Fibre Compound Lot 12 2 Yandella Promenade Tapping.doc This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Warren Andersen
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 5
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider an application for a Master Antenna TV (MATV)
and Broadband Fibre facility in Tapping.
|
Applicant
|
Development Planning Strategies
|
|
Owner
|
Lonnegal Property Pty Ltd
|
|
Location
|
Part Lot 12 (2) Yandella Promenade, Tapping
|
|
Area
|
100m2
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
Background
The subject land is located within East Wanneroo Cell 1
Agreed Structure Plan (ASP). Attachments 1 and 2 indicate the
location of the site in the ASP map and on the subject land. It is noted that
this site located in the Kestrels Estate, would be part of a proposed Public
Open Space (POS).
(a) An
initial development proposal received on 17 January 2006 comprised the
following:
(i) Ten
(10) metre high mast with one (1) antenna, and two (2) 500mm wide dishes
attached;
(ii) Two (2) ground-mounted
dishes three (3) metres high; and
(iii) One
colourbond metal transportable equipment shelter with the dimensions of 3.5
metres by 4.5 metres, and 2 metres high.
Following a public consultation period in April 2006 and
discussion with Council Officers in September 2006, the applicant lodged an
amended proposal dated 10 November 2006, comprising the following (refer
Attachment 3 for site and elevation plans): -
(a) Two
(2) ground-mounted dishes three (3) metres high;
(b) A
colourbond metal transportable shelter of the same dimensions;
(c) A television antenna 3.5 metres high located on the
top of the transportable shelter; and
(d) A 1.8
metre high colourbond perimeter fence.
In the period between January and October 2007, there was a
change of consultant dealing with the proposal.
(b) The amended proposal was re-advertised for 21 days
in January 2008. This entailed:
(i) letters to adjoining landowners;
(ii) sign on site; and
(iii) Newspaper advertising.
Detail
The applicant has provided the following information in
support of the proposal: -
·
The proposed telecommunications compound provides a base for an
underground communications network linked to a single underground cable, for
free to air television, satellite services, broadband internet, and telephony
services for residents within the Kestrels Estate and surrounding locality
(Ashton Heights).
·
The transportable building will contain equipment for power
transmission to the equipment and air-conditioning, and there are no toilets or
gas heaters intended onsite.
·
Co-location of the proposed facility at an existing
telecommunication facilities in the Carramar Estate has been investigated and
would be cost prohibitive, based on the required installation of a three (3)
kilometre trench and conduit, and that a similar sized compound and
infrastructure would still be required in the Kestrels Estate.
·
The proposal will prevent the proliferation of television aerials
and satellite dishes on individual houses within the Kestrels Estate.
·
The location and size of the compound has been selected to
minimise any potential visual impacts to the surrounding residential area. The
subject land does not directly abut any residential lots, is located between
road reserves and a 1.8 metre high colourbond fence will screen the facility.
Alternate locations have been investigated but would require the use of a
structural mast exceeding ten (10) metres in height.
·
The use of the 100m2 portion of public open space will
not reduce the overall public open space provision, as there is an
overprovision of public open space within East Wanneroo Cell 1.
·
The proposed facility will ultimately be created on a separate
lot, which currently forms part of Lot 12. The proposed subdivision will not
occur until such time that the extension and creation of Yandella Promenade
road reserve occurs.
·
The proposed location has been carefully chosen to enable a
Line-of-Site link to provide broadband backbone to the facility and have
minimal visual impact.
·
The telecommunications operator (Broadcast Engineering Services)
has indicated that there is no hazard for the general public at ground level in
relation to electro magnetic emissions (EME). This is due to the facility
being for reception purposes for television and broadband Internet services
only and not for mobile phone telecommunications purposes.
·
The services that are proposed to be provided to the residents of
the Kestrels estate include the following –
-
Broadband Internet Access
-
Distribution of free-to-air, subscription and satellite TV
-
Video on demand (VOD)
-
VOIP Telephone
-
Metering options for utility companies, and
-
High bandwidth WAN links with capability for home business application.
Consultation
The proposal was advertised on two occasions. The initial
proposal was advertised for 14 days on the 10 April 2006. During the
advertising period the City received the following: -
·
A petition with 58 signatures objecting to the proposal, and
·
Four individual letters objecting to the proposal.
On receipt of an amended plan from the applicant, the City
again advertised it for 21 days in January 2008 and the City received two
submissions.
Smart Growth Strategy
The City’s Smart Growth Strategy identifies “the creation
of distinct and vibrant communities that enhance and develop the identities of
our places’ as one of the six principles. This encompasses the provision of
services and infrastructure to meet the needs of the community. The proposal
is deemed to be supporting this objective in providing new and more efficient
technology to the community.
Comment
Response to the Submissions
The main issues raised by the submissions, together with a
comment on each is outlined below:
Issue
1. Radiation Risk
There will
be radiation risk to the nearby dwellings, schools, day care centres and playground.
Comment
The applicant has advised that EME levels are within
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) limits for
radiation risk.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 2 - Devaluation of Surrounding Properties
The proposal will result in the devaluation of the
properties.
Comment
The submittors have not demonstrated how the proposed
facility would devalue the properties. It is also not proven, and would require
the submittor to engage an independent land valuer for assessment.
Recommendation.
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 3 - Interference with electrical equipment
The proposal may interfere with the electrical equipment.
Comment
The equipment has been designed to limit interference by
utilising underground cabling and broadband technology.
Recommendation
That the issue not be supported.
The amended proposal received on 10 November 2006 would
reduce the overall impact on the community and therefore it is recommended that
Council approves it subject to conditions.
Other Issues
POS area
The proposed location of the facility is within an area
designated for POS as per the WAPC approval 128438 dated 17 October 2005, which
will ultimately become a Reserve vested in the City for the purpose of Public
Recreation (refer Attachment 4). Based on the subdivision approval,
Landgate has issued a Deposited Plan No.57859 depicting this POS area excepting
a portion to accommodate the subject facility (refer Attachment 5).
However, this portion is being shown as part of the parent lot under the
possession of the developer. In this regard the applicant has advised that it
is intended to create a separate reserve to accommodate the proposed facility.
The Department of Planning and Infrastructure officers have supported this
approach subject to there being no loss in the overall POS contribution in Cell
1 ASP area. Since the developers have provided an oversupply of POS within
their Kestrels Estate, which is more than 100m2, the subject
proposal is in order. It is recommended that the applicant be advised to take
further action with the Department of Land Information for the creation of a
separate reserve with appropriate use and management order being issued to the
City with powers to lease.
Under the lease arrangement the applicant will retain
ownership and management of the facility. It is noted that Council will
consider the lease arrangement separately under another report.
Statutory Compliance
The proposed use is ‘Telecommunications Infrastructure’ in
accordance with the use class table of District Planning Scheme Number 2, which
is a discretionary use in a Residential zone.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
The principles of locational criteria from the Council’s
Mobile Telephone Base Station Policy are applicable in this case,
notwithstanding the applicant’s argument that the facility is a ‘line of sight
radio link’ to provide broadband services, as opposed to a standard mobile
telephone base station.
The deletion of the initial 10-metre tower and fixtures and
the inclusion of roof-mounted antenna have reduced the visual impact, and the
EME associated with the proposal. A report from consultants ‘Broadband
Engineering and Services’ states that the ground level EME levels are within
the requirements of ARPANSA standards. The Council’s policy states an applicant
must address the following criteria:
(1) Co-location
of Antenna Facilities – The proposal is 3 kilometres from a similar
facility at Carramar, and is therefore considered necessary to provide the
service level required in the Kestrels Estate.
(2) Minimization
of Visual Impact – The use of colour-bond metal material and appropriate
green colour for the surrounding fence and transportable building in
conjunction with additional landscape screening, would result in an acceptable
development on this site.
(3) 500
metre buffer – Proximity of the proposal to sensitive land-uses
(residential, childcare centres, schools, and similar uses as determined by the
Council). In this case, the proposed facility is within a 500-metre buffer to
dwellings only, however the Council can exercise discretion based on the
facility being for underground cable communications technology with minimal EME
output.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:
1. APPROVES
the application for the proposed Master Antenna TV and Broadband Fibre Compound
submitted by Development Planning Strategies on behalf of Lonnegal Property Pty
Ltd on Part Lot 12 (2) Yandella Promenade, Tapping as shown on Attachment 5 to
this report subject to:
a) The
applicant taking necessary action with the Department of Land Administration,
for the creation of a separate reserve with an appropriate use and to issue the
City with a management order with powers to lease;
b) No
development to occur until the land is transferred to the City under a
Management Order with power to lease and an appropriate lease arrangement
between the applicant and the City has been negotiated to the satisfaction of
the City of Wanneroo;
c) External
cladding of the transportable shelter building, and fencing, shall be
constructed from non-reflective metal sheeting, such as green colourbond;
d) Applicant
to submit detail of additional landscaping treatment to screen the proposed
building.
2. NOTES
that a separate report will be presented in relation to the proposed lease
arrangements.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Delegated
Authority Reports
File Ref: S09/0009V014
File Name: FA Development Applications Determined By
Delegated Authority for March 2008.doc This line will not be printed Please do
NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Sue Shatford
Meeting Date: 6 May
2008
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
Development Applications determined by Administration
between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2008, acting under Delegated Authority
from Council.
Background
Nil
Detail
The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2)
provides Council with planning approval powers which are designed to avoid
conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary
to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as
building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not
generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the
requirements of the Residential Design Codes (RD Codes.)
Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for
decision making on planning applications to certain officers in Administration
which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day
statutory period and within normal customer expectations.
Administration, in assessing planning proposals, attempts
to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and
requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the
issues raised in the assessment of each individual planning application.
Planning applications determined by Administration between
01 March 2008 and 31 March 2008, acting under Delegated Authority from Council
are included in Attachment 1.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at
its meeting on 29 August 2006 (item GS08-08/06 refers). The decisions referred
to in Attachment 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.
Strategic Implications
This report is consistent with the corporate management and
development goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to establish an
organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Planning applications incur administration fees which are
generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees)
Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The
estimated cost of development for each application is listed in Attachment 1.
Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either
applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the determinations made by
Administration acting under delegated authority from Council on planning
applications processed between 01 March 2008 and 31 March 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA07/1107 27/11/2007 80 $350,000,000.00 Approved
Prop address 140 PEDERICK
ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031
Land Lot
507 D 61476 Vol 1577 Fol 364
Description POWER
STATION
Applicants NEWGEN
NEERABUP PTY LTD
File Number P23/0110V01
DA08/0171 18/02/2008 14 $200,000.00 Approved
Prop address 140 PEDERICK
ROAD NEERABUP WA 6031
Land Lot
507 D 61476 Vol 1577 Fol 364
Description INDUSTRIAL -
SITE STORAGE YARDS
AND
SITE OFFICES - NEWGEN POWER STATION
Applicants NEWGEN
POWER NEERABUP PTY LTD
File Number P23/0110V01
DA08/0134 08/02/2008 17 $22,000.00 Approved
Prop address 121 TRICHET
ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Part
Lot 35 D 41993 Vol 2049 Fol 690
Description SWIMMING
POOL ADDITION
Applicants SW
CHAN
File Number P14/0036V01
DA08/0197.01 29/02/2008 7 $3,000.00 Approved
Prop address 20B STANSTED
CRESCENT
MARANGAROO
WA 6064
Land Lot
2 Vol 1922 Fol 284 S/P 22112
Description GROUPED
DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
(Unit
B)
Applicants S
DERVISKADIC
File Number P19/2294V01
DA07/1184 14/12/2007 63 $380,000.00 Refused
Prop address 12 HUGHIE
EDWARDS DRIVE
MERRIWA
WA 6030
Land Lot
6 DP 48043
Description GROWERS MART
Applicants STONEWALL
CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number P21/1455V01
DA08/0168 13/02/2008 18 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 5 CYCLAMEN
COURT WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot
28 D 75034 Vol 1825 Fol 425
Description SHED
ADDITION
Applicants AVALON
SHEDS AND STABLES
File Number P34/0148V01
DA08/0135 08/02/2008 19 $22,780.00 Approved
Prop address 16 MOBILIA
PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot
65 DP 25804 Vol 2503 Fol 35
Description SPECIAL
RURAL - SWIMMING
POOL
ADDITION
Applicants AQUA
TECHNICS (WA) PTY LTD
File Number P12/0201V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0017 30/12/2007 30 $610,145.00 Approved
Prop address 2 ELMHURST
DRIVE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
2120 DP 50290
Description FOUR GROUPED
DWELLINGS
(SINGLE
BEDROOM)
Applicants ARKITEKIO
ARCHITECTS
File Number P08/3053V01
DA07/1183 14/12/2007 57 $136,687.27 Approved
Prop address 233
LANDSDALE ROAD LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot
866 DP 54340 Vol 2667 Fol 956
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants AFFORDABLE
LIVING HOMES
File Number P17/1795V01
DA08/0228 13/03/2008 8 $15,100.00 Approved
Prop address 67 TRICHET
ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Part
Lot 29 D 34655 Vol 1988 Fol 545
Description GENERAL
RURAL - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants OUTDOOR
WORLD
File Number P14/0033V01
DA07/1003 01/11/2007 93 $19,000.00 Approved
Prop address 170 FRANKLIN
ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Part
Lot 5 D 26189 Vol 2003 Fol 252
Description SHED
EXTENSION
Applicants TNB
MAI
File Number P14/0027V01
DA08/0200 27/02/2008 6 $2,400.00 Approved
Prop address 21 BROOKLYN
AVENUE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot
1 Vol 2583 Fol 972 S/P 46866
Description GROUPED
DWELLING - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants HERITAGE
OUTDOOR
File Number P25/0205V01
DA07/1116 29/11/2007 13 $280,000.00 Approved
Prop address 9 RISANA
CLOSE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot
1000 DP 50625 Vol 2641 Fol 984
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants M
PASH
File Number P18/1582V01
DA08/0207 04/03/2008 8 $104,089.00 Approved
Prop address 25 SPERANZA
PARKWAY
SINAGRA
WA 6065
Land Lot
942 DP 53364 Vol 2648 Fol 998
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants BGC
RESIDENTIAL PTY LTD
File Number P29/0513V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0183 27/02/2008 12 $272,728.00 Approved
Prop address 10 TRAMINER
WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot
163 DP 52776
Description GROUPED
DWELLING
Applicants A
SPANO
File Number P25/0762V01
DA08/0026 04/01/2008 26 $4,389,850.00 Approved
Prop address 52 KAHANA
PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1183 DP 52130
Description SIX MULTIPLE
DWELLINGS
(INCLUDING
ONE SINGLE BEDROOM DWELLING)
Applicants J
MCQUADE
File Number P05/2519V01
DA08/0181 25/02/2008 12 $640,000.00 Approved
Prop address 35 BORANUP
AVENUE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
603 DP 55213 Vol 2673 Fol 224
Description EIGHT (8)
WAREHOUSE UNITS
Applicants REDBELL
HOLDINGS PTY LTD
File Number P08/3608V01
DA06/0479 27/06/2006 455 $45,000.00 Approved
Prop address 561
ALEXANDER DRIVE LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot
55 P 8649 Vol 1844 Fol 955
Description NURSERY
Applicants MGA
TOWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS
File Number P17/0914V01
DA08/0209 07/03/2008 14 $80,000.00 Approved
Prop address 23 LONGRIDGE
RISE
QUINNS
ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot
106 P 19757 Vol 2002 Fol 544
Description SINGLE HOUSE
- EXTENSION &
GARAGE
ADDITIONS
Applicants MF
TURNER
File Number P27/1933V01
DA08/0141 12/02/2008 15 $1,425,000.00 Approved
Prop address 32
CLARECASTLE RETREAT
MINDARIE
WA 6030
Land Lot
36 D 87577 Vol 2056 Fol 485
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS
Applicants MANOR
HOME BUILDERS PTY LTD
File Number P22/1225V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0225 05/03/2008 17 $160,710.00 Approved
Prop address 16
RIVERLINKS DRIVE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
1207 DP 46797 Vol 2602 Fol 485
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants BGC
RESIDENTIAL PTY LTD
File Number P08/3611V01
DA08/0192 22/02/2008 14 $200,000.00 Approved
Prop address 47/146 ST
ANDREWS DRIVE
YANCHEP
WA 6035
Land Lot
47 Vol 2614 Fol 147 S/P 48121
Description GROUPED
DWELLING
Applicants SUMMIT
PROJECTS
File Number P36/1042V01
DA08/0082 21/01/2008 49 $169,985.00 Approved
Prop address 15 ICEBERG
WAY DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot
776 DP 50063 Vol 2640 Fol 809
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants REDINK
HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P09/1629V01
DA08/0042 04/01/2008 26 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 44 KAHANA
PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1179 DP 52130
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS AND
TWO
MULTIPLE DWELLINGS (SINGLE BEDROOM)
Applicants J
MCQUADE
File Number P05/2524V01
DA08/0139 11/02/2008 22 $450,000.00 Approved
Prop address 5 HARRISON
LANE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot
221 DP 54868 Vol 2664 Fol 391
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS
Applicants RD
D'ALESIO
File Number P18/1708v01
DA08/0147 14/02/2008 10 $146,000.95 Approved
Prop address 69 ROSEGREEN
AVENUE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1439 DP 56138 Vol 2668 Fol 926
Description SINGLE
DWELLING
Applicants TANGENT
NOMINEES PTY LTD
File Number P05/2456V01
DA08/0187 25/02/2008 19 $9,160.00 Approved
Prop address 137 RUSTIC
GARDENS CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot
184 D 74489 Vol 1824 Fol 374
Description SPECIAL
RURAL - OUTBUILDING
Applicants OUTDOOR
WORLD
File Number P07/0676V01
DA08/0126 05/02/2008 25 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 13A NEVILLE
DRIVE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot
1 Vol 411 Fol 046A S/P 401
Description SINGLE HOUSE
ADDITIONS
Applicants JR
MADIN
File Number P34/0026V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/03/2008
AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA07/1074 23/11/2007 73 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 2/28
BALTIMORE PARADE MERRIWA WA 6030
Land Lot
2 Vol 2043 Fol 184 S/P 29280
Description CHANGE OF
USE TO PRIVATE RECREATION
(DANCE
STUDIO)
Applicants JM
BELL
File Number P21/0104V01
DA08/0190 27/02/2008 16 $27,500.00 Approved
Prop address 90A MINDARIE
DRIVE QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot
1 Vol 2122 Fol 499 S/P 33451
Description GROUPED
DWELLING - GUEST ROOM
EXTENSION
(UNIT A)
Applicants TG
ALLEN
File Number P27/1319V01
DA08/0169 21/02/2008 26 $11,700.00 Approved
Prop address 54 PAINI WAY
JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Lot
114 P 21843 Vol 2205 Fol 116
Description SINGLE HOUSE
- WATER TANK ADDITION
Applicants JS
KERR
File Number P14/008V01
DA08/0178 14/02/2008 23 $40,000.00 Approved
Prop address 40
MARIGINIUP ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot
61 DP 25532
Description GRANNY FLAT
& GARAGE AMENDMENT
Refer
DA07/0998)
Applicants LJM
BORRELLO
File Number P20/0194V01
DA07/0957 16/10/2007 64 $275,000.00 Approved
Prop address 114 ASHLEY
ROAD TAPPING WA 6065
Land Lot
645 DP 52684 Vol 2648 Fol 512
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS
Applicants DANMAR
HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P31/2229V01
DA07/0903 03/10/2007 55 $275,000.00 Approved
Prop address 6 GINSBURG
TURN TAPPING WA 6065
Land Lot
848 DP 52684 Vol 2648 Fol 546
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS
Applicants DANMAR
HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P31/2161V01
DA08/0202 29/02/2008 20 $274,010.00 Approved
Prop address 1 HARRISON
LANE MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot
222 DP 54868 Vol 2664 Fol 392
Description TWO GROUPED
DWELLINGS
Applicants VENTURA
SPECIAL PROJECTS
File Number P18/1755V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0132 06/02/2008 26 $340,000.00 Approved
Prop address 21 CALOUNDRA
ROAD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
610 DP 55213 Vol 2673 Fol 231
Description FOUR (4)
WAREHOUSE UNITS
Applicants VESPOLI
CONSTRUCTIONS
File Number P08/3597V01
DA08/0127 05/02/2008 28 $1,247,000.00 Approved
Prop address 17 CALOUNDRA
ROAD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
612 DP 55213 Vol 2673 Fol 233
Description TEN (10)
WAREHOUSE UNITS
Applicants HINDLEY
& ASSOCIATES PTY LTD
File Number P08/3569V01
DA08/0206 04/03/2008 3 $162,095.00 Approved
Prop address 93 ROSEGREEN
AVENUE BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1591 DP 56924 Vol 2675 Fol 777
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants BGC
RESIDENTIAL PTY LTD
File Number P05/2580V01
DA08/0088 25/01/2008 14 $16,000.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED 2
ST MALO COURT
MINDARIE
WA 6030
Land Lot
30 D 74818 Vol 1831 Fol 741
Description RETAINING
WALL
Applicants RW
JOHNSON
File Number P22/1526V01
DA07/0771 28/08/2007 146 $15,000.00 Approved
Prop address 111 TRICHET
ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Part
Lot 34 D 42270 Vol 1339 Fol 530
Description RETAINING
WALL
Applicants RMG
WENN
File Number P14/0021V01
DA08/0163 21/02/2008 13 $9,000.00 Approved
Prop address 18 VIA VISTA
DRIVE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot
53 D 76091 Vol 1840 Fol 975
Description SINGLE HOUSE
- SWIMMING POOL ADDITION
Applicants AV
CONTI-NIBALI
File Number P20/0150V01
DA08/0219 11/03/2008 5 $8,500.00 Approved
Prop address SAFE'N'SOUND
DAY CARE 2 DEWAR MEWS
CLARKSON
WA 6030
Land Lot
1 D 90434 Vol 2065 Fol 857
Description CHILD CARE
CENTRE - PORCH ENCLOSURE
Applicants R
HINEIDI
File Number P08/1095V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA07/1169 12/12/2007 30 $4,500,000.00 Approved
Prop address PETER MOYES
ANGLICAN SCHOOL
29
ELLISTON PARADE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot
506 P 23458
Description MULTI PURPOSE
HALL & CLASSROOMS
-
STAGE 5
Applicants MARCUS
COLLINS ARCHITECTS
File Number P22/2241V01
DA08/0170 21/02/2008 23 $130,000.00 Approved
Prop address 9 WINDY LANE
YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot
652 DP 53318 Vol 2651 Fol 680
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants G
SULESKI
File Number P36/1481V01
DA08/0046 04/01/2008 26 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 25 NAVARRE
WAY BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1187 DP 52130
Description FIVE
MULTIPLE DWELLINGS
(INCLUDING
TWO SINGLE BEDROOM DWELLINGS)
Applicants J
MCQUADE
File Number P05/2531V01
DA08/0142 13/02/2008 16 $16,000.00 Approved
Prop address 310 OCEAN
KEYS BOULEVARD
CLARKSON
WA 6030
Land Lot
36 Vol 2655 Fol 236 S/P 52189
Description CHANGE OF
USE TO RESTAURANT/CAFÉ
Applicants APALIOP
PTY LTD T/A APALIOP TRUST C/-
File Number P08/3536V01
DA08/0224 25/01/2008 9 $140,061.00 Approved
Prop address 19 BLISS WAY
CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
2250 DP 53859 Vol 2658 Fol 830
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants HOMESTART
File Number P08/3623V01
DA08/0213 06/03/2008 8 $146,885.00 Approved
Prop address 7 DALRY COVE
BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot
1542 DP 54861 Vol 2660 Fol 229
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants BGC
RESIDENTIAL PTY LTD
File Number P05/2479V01
DA07/1135 29/11/2007 71 $2,000,000.00 Approved
Prop address 11
PROSPERITY AVENUE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot
405 DP 55527 Vol 2665 Fol 963
Description TWO (2)
LEVEL OFFICE / WAREHOUSE
Applicants GAVIN
CONSTRUCTION
File Number P33/0628V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0113 31/01/2008 28 $250,000.00 Approved
Prop address 66 ATTWELL
STREET LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot
50 D 73899
Description Industrial -
Commercial Development
Applicants P
HONCZARENKO
File Number P17/1511V01
DA08/0108 23/01/2008 5 $0.00 Refused
Prop address 90 BAYPORT
CIRCUIT MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot
491 P 16797 Vol 1934 Fol 422
Description COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE PARKING
Applicants CH
NGUYEN, HT TRAN
File Number P22/2194V01
DA08/0185 19/02/2008 14 $157,897.00 Approved
Prop address 6/146 ST
ANDREWS DRIVE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot
6 Vol 2614 Fol 106 S/P 48121
Description GROUPED
DWELLING
Applicants J
CORP T/AS IMPRESSIONS
File Number P36/1042V01
DA08/0258 19/03/2008 7 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 11 HANOI WAY
HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot
257 DP 56911
Description CHANGE OF
USE - RESIDENTIAL
TO
DISPLAY HOME
Applicants CHAPPELL
LAMBERT EVERETT
File Number P13/1517V01
DA08/0194 28/02/2008 4 $25,488.00 Approved
Prop address 89 SUBLIME
GLADE CARRAMAR WA 6031
Land Lot
61 P 13455 Vol 1585 Fol 766
Description SWIMMING
POOL ADDITION
Applicants SAPPHIRE
POOLS
File Number P07/1533V01
DA08/0199 28/02/2008 5 $14,000.00 Approved
Prop address 70 LAKELANDS
DRIVE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot
118 P 16139 Vol 1811 Fol 006
Description SINGLE HOUSE
- PATIO ADDITION
Applicants PATIO
LIVING
File Number P12/0028V01
DA08/0234 13/03/2008 10 $11,780.00 Approved
Prop address 58 GRAHAM
ROAD QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot
2 Vol 2075 Fol 286 S/P 31188
Description RETAINING
WALL ADDITION
Applicants CONWOOD
RETAINING WALLS
File Number P27/1852V01
Development Applications determined for
Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN
01/03/2008 AND 31/03/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0242 18/03/2008 5 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 1 HALIFAX
BOULEVARD MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot
961 P 23586 Vol 2172 Fol 092
Description HOME
BUSINESS - CATEGORY 3 - BEAUTY THERAPY
Applicants MJ
AUGUST
File Number P22/0275V01
DA08/0161 20/02/2008 14 $5,000.00 Approved
Prop address 58 SUSAN
ROAD MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot
631 DP 50990 Vol 2633 Fol 735
Description FRONT FENCE
ADDITON
Applicants G
PELLEGRINI
File Number P18/1487V01
DA08/0204 27/02/2008 10 $146,870.00 Approved
Prop address 57 CAPITOL
TURN CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot
2244 DP 53859 Vol 2658 Fol 824
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants HOMEBUYERS
CENTRE
File Number P08/3416V01
DA08/0166 19/02/2008 28 $200,000.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED
131 FLYNN DRIVE BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot
9025 DP 49059 Vol 2659 Fol 421
Description DISPLAY HOME
Applicants CHAPPELL
LAMBERT EVERETT
File Number P04/0064V02
DA08/0159 13/02/2008 19 $130,787.27 Approved
Prop address 19 LANDSDALE
ROAD DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot
424 DP 57659 Vol 2678 Fol 036
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants METROSTYLE
File Number P09/0444v01
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: S09/0008
File Name: FC Subdivision Applications Determined
Under Delegated Authority During March 2008.doc This line will not be printed
Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Sue Shatford
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 9
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
Determination of subdivision applications processed in the
period for the month of March 2008 under delegated
authority.
Detail
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is
responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State.
Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments
and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of
receiving the application after which the Commission determines the
applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with
the Commission’s decision.
Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its
functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on
subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to
the Planning and Development Directorate this responsibility. A Land
Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all
applications.
Those applications considered to be either controversial in
nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for
consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the
following categories.
SCU 1 Subdivision
applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed
Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).
SCU 2 Subdivision
applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently
determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with
the Council’s recommendation.
SCU 3 Applications
for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were
previously supported by Council.
SCU 4 Applications
for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development
approval given by or on behalf of Council.
SCU 5 Applications
for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of
the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated
including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump
sites, school sites, etc.
SCU 6 Applications
for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or
are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.
The following table provides the details of the subdivision
applications dealt with under delegated authority in the period for the month
of March 2008.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the actions
taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning
Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority in
the period for the month of March 2008 as listed below:
Subdivision Application Delegations
|
Att
|
WAPC
No/ Received Date
|
Location
/ Owner
|
DPS2
Zoning
LDU
Category
|
Advice
|
WAPC
Advised
|
|
1
|
136954
25/02/2008
|
Lot 13 (25) Rousset
Road, Mariginiup
Edward J Watling
& Pamela J Watling
|
Rural Resource
SCU6
|
Not Supported
|
06/03/2008
|
|
2
|
137099
17/03/2008
|
Lot 65 (17) Rogers
Way, Landsdale
Dennis A Burke &
Colm P O’Hagan
|
General Industrial
SCU5
|
Supported
|
25/03/2008
|
|
3
|
406-08
26/03/2008
|
Lot 1 (26 ) Rothesay
Heights, Mindarie
Glenn N Kay &
Jane B Gordon
|
Residential
SCU5
|
Supported
|
28/03/2008
|
|
4
|
136901
21/02/2008
|
Lot 110 (100) Paini
Way, Jandabup
Milino Pty Ltd &
John E Squarcini
|
General Rural
SCU6
|
Not Supported
|
06/03/2008
|
|
5
|
136849
08/02/2008
|
Lot 100 (225)
Kingsway, Darch
Barwell Nominees Pty
Ltd
|
Urban Development
SCU1
|
Supported
|
20/03/2008
|
|
6
|
337-08
13/03/2008
|
Lot 851 (53)
Hardcastle Avenue, Landsdale
Everdew Pty Ltd
|
Urban Development
SCU1
|
Supported
|
27/03/2008
|
|
7
|
136816
12/02/2008
|
Lot 9014 (602) Two
Rocks Road, Yanchep
Yanchep Sun City Pty
Ltd & Capricorn Investment Group Pty Ltd
|
Urban Development
SCU1
|
Supported
|
13/03/2008
|
|
8
|
137013
07/03/2008
|
Lot 405 (21)
Braemount Road, Darch
Pero Tomic,
Sebastijan Tomic, Ljilja Tomic
|
Urban Development
SCU5
|
Supported
|
14/03/2008
|
|
9
|
137134
17/03/2008
|
Lot 243 (4)
Dellamarta Road, Wangara
West Coast Ministries
International
|
Service Industrial
SCU5
|
Supported
|
26/03/2008
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Infrastructure
File Ref: C08007V01
File Name: AA Tender 08007 The Construction of
Ocean Reef Road Dual Carriageway Extension Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade
Wa.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Graeme Budge
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08007 – The Construction of Ocean
Reef Road dual carriageway extension from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade,
Wangara.
Background
Council considered a report at a meeting on 5 June 2007
(Item IN09-06/07) and adopted a number of resolutions including the following:
That
Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the conditional offer of $7,030,100
from the Australian Government towards the Ocean Reef Road Project (Hartman
Drive to Alexander Drive) from the AusLink Strategic Regional Programme.
2. AUTHORISES the Acting Chief Executive
Officer to execute the Funding Agreement between the City of Wanneroo and the
Department of Transport and Regional Services for submission to the Department
prior to 15 June 2007.
3. NOTES that the $7,030,100 will be retained
in restricted grants for allocation in the Five Year Roadworks Capital Works
Program to enable construction of the Ocean Reef Road project before the June
2010 deadline.
$7,030,100 was received from the Federal Government in June
2007 and $230,100 was allocated in PR-2609 for the design & documentation
of the proposed works with the remainder retained in the restricted grants.
The survey and design works commenced in June 2007 and the
final design was prepared in March 2008 leading to the invitation of tenders in
April 2008. This report considers the tenders and recommendation to accept a
tenderer for the construction of the Ocean Reef Road dual carriageway extension
from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade, Wangara.
Detail
The scope of works included in this construction contract
is for the construction of a dual carriageway extension in Ocean Reef Road from
east of Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade, comprising works at Prestige Parade
and Badgerup Road intersections such as earthworks, road pavement construction,
kerbs, medians, signage, lane marking, new concrete pathways, drainage works
and street lighting works. The scope of works for this contract excludes
intersection works at Hartman Drive which will be performed by the City.
Tender No 08007 for the construction of Ocean Reef Road
dual carriageway extension from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade was advertised
on 15 March 2008 and closed at the City’s Offices at 3.00pm on 8 April 2008
with the receipt of the following ten submissions:
|
No
|
Tenderer
|
|
1
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
|
2
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
|
3
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
|
4
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
|
5
|
Georgiou Group
|
|
6
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
|
7
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
|
8
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
|
9
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
|
10
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
Two companies submitted their tenders after the stipulated
time and have not been considered for evaluation.
Tender Assessment
The Tender Evaluation Panel comprising the Project Manager
Major Works, Manager Infrastructure Projects and the Contracts Officer has
evaluated tenders based upon the following selection criteria:
|
1
|
Price
for the Works offered
|
|
2
|
Tenderer’s demonstrated experience in carrying out works similar
to the required works
|
|
3
|
Tenderer’s resources and capacity
|
|
4
|
Tenderer’s organisational and quality management systems
|
|
5
|
Tenderer’s safety management system
|
The scope of works require the construction works to be
undertaken under nearby trafficked conditions at Badgerup Road requiring access
to be maintained at all times, and staging of the works with LandCorp’s
contractor.
Tenderers have provided varying levels of information in
their tenders and this has been reflected in the weightings that have been
applied to the selection criteria.
Price for the Works offered
All tenderers were also asked to provide a lump sum price
for the main scope of works, unit rates for labour, materials and plant hire to
accommodate any change in the scope of works during construction and costs for
the following additional item as required.
·
Dayworks (DW16) relates to the supply and spreading of 75mm thick
woodchip mulch in verges and median to make up the shortfall from the cleared
material on site.
·
Dayworks (DW17) relates to hydromulching of earthworks for dust
control.
The price from the tenderers is in ascending order as
follows:
Tenderer
|
Tender Price
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$3,201,714.29
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
$3,385,319.50
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
$3,472,217.74
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$3,489,566.44
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
$3,607,541.77
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
$3,633,426.66
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
$3,832,295.00
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
$4,163,044.70
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
$4,184,064.00
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
$4,241,484.00
|
Some of these tenderers had based their lump sum price on a
number of assumptions and qualified items such as the Badgerup Road closure,
supply of water, removal of rubbish from the site and fuel pricing.
Clarifications were sought from these tenderers and the ranking assessment for
the price took into consideration tenderer clarifications, received as part of
the tender evaluation process, to ensure the same requirements for the project
were being allowed by all in their tendered price. As a result, tenders have
been ranked as below under this criterion:
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
4
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
5
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
6
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
7
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
8
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
9
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
10
|
This criterion represents 60% of
the total score.
Tenderer’s demonstrated experience
in carrying out works similar to the required works
Tenderers have demonstrated varying levels of experience in
carrying out works similar to the tendered works. Tenderers have differing
levels of experience and this level of experience has been reflected in the
weightings applied in the Selection Criteria. The companies, which have
undertaken projects in conditions similar to those for Ocean Reef Road, have
ranked higher than the others. Based on the information provided, tenderers
have been ranked in the following order:
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
1
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
1
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
2
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
3
|
This criterion represents 20% of the total score.
Tenderer’s resources and capacity
All tenderers have provided details of their plant and
equipment, personnel and current work commitments. Information given indicates
that the Ocean Reef Road project would suit the workload of all tenderers with
some tenderers seeking new work and others with current projects nearing
completion. Companies, which have significantly larger resources at their
disposal, have been ranked higher than the others. Tenderers’ resources have
been considered and these have been reflected in the weightings applied in the
Selection Criteria.
Based on the information provided,
tenderers have been ranked in the following order:
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
1
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
1
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
3
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
4
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
4
|
This criterion represents 10% of
the total score.
Organisational and Quality Management
An assessment was made of the tenderer’s organisation
structure and company policies and procedures with a focus on the applicability
of these procedures to the tendered works. Tenderers that have presented a
quality management plan and are ISO Quality Assured have been ranked higher
under this criteria:
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
2
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
2
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
3
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
4
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
4
|
This criterion represents 5% of the total score.
Tenderer’s Safety Management system
Evidence of safety management policies and practices was assessed
from the tender documents. The assessment for safety management was based on
the tenderers’ responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management System
Questionnaire included within the tender documentation. All tenderers provided
details of their safety management systems. Tenderers achieved varied scores in
this area as some had responded more comprehensively to the items in the City’s
OHS Management System Questionnaire than others.
Based on the information provided, tenderers have been ranked in the
following order:
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
2
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
2
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
2
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
4
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
4
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
5
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
5
|
This criterion represents 5% of the total score.
Overall Ranking Assessment
The ten tenderers’ submissions
were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process and the
consolidated overall ranking of tenderers based on a weighted score is shown
below:
|
Tenderer
|
Rank
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
1
|
|
Georgiou Group
|
2
|
|
Marsh Civil Pty Ltd
|
3
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co
|
4
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
|
5
|
|
Croker Construction (WA) Pty Ltd
|
6
|
|
Tasman Civil Pty Ltd
|
7
|
|
Densford Civil Pty Ltd
|
8
|
|
Riverlea Corporation
|
9
|
|
Curnow Earthmoving Pty Ltd
|
10
|
The evaluation process determined that the tender from VDM
Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd fully complies with the requirements of the
tender, meets the selection criteria and has been ranked highest in accordance
with the selection criteria and weightings.
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd (previously known as
Malavoca) have been used previously by the City on construction projects
similar to the required works including the Connolly Drive dual carriageway
project. They have completed works under traffic, including sewer, water, lighting,
drainage, traffic signals, street scaping and irrigation. They have completed
works in a timely and professional manner, and with a high degree of
workmanship.
Based on the Tender Evaluation Team’s assessment of the
tender submissions, VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd tender lump sum bid of
$3,489,566.44 is recommended for acceptance.
Consultation
Full traffic access will be maintained in Badgerup Road for
the duration of construction period. An advisory letter will be sent to
residents within the proximity of the works advising of the construction period
and the changes that will occur with the Badgerup Road intersection with Ocean
Reef Road.
Consistent liaison has been maintained with Benchmark
Projects, the Projects Managers for LandCorp to ensure the coordination of bulk
earthworks and construction of a portion of Prestige Parade by LandCorp.
Comment
Tenders have been evaluated in accordance with the
selection criteria and based on the tender evaluation undertaken, the tender
from VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd for a tender price of $3,489,566.44
provides the best outcome for the City and is recommended for acceptance.
Subject to Council’s acceptance of this tender, works are
to commence towards the end of May 2008 with civil works completion scheduled
for November 2008.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against
the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government
Act and associated Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender
process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation
process and result.
Strategic Implications
The Construction of the Ocean Reef Road dual carriageway
extension from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade, Wangara is aligned with the
following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan goals and strategies:
“Social
2.5 Improve transport
options and connections
Economic
3.2 Improve regional
infrastructure”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
By accepting the tender from VDM Earthmoving Contractors
Pty Ltd, the total estimated cost of the Stage 1 of Ocean Reef Road dual
carriageway extension works, including any consulting fees that will be
incurred is summarised as follows:
|
ITEM DESCRIPTION
|
AMOUNT
|
|
Contract works price based on VDM
Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
tender
|
$3,489,566.44
|
|
Design fees for Stage
1 Ocean Reef Road Extension to Alexander Drive (Provisional)
|
$230,000.00
|
|
Project
Management/Construction Management Charges
|
$110,000.00
|
|
Landscaping Costs (Estimated)
|
$310,000.00
|
|
Ocean Reef Road/Hartman Drive Intersection
including Traffic Signals
|
$700,000.00
|
|
Contingency
|
$250,000.00
|
|
TOTAL PROJECT COST
|
5,089,956.44
|
Following the resolutions adopted by Council (Item
IN09-06/07) at a meeting on 5 June 2007, Federal Government’s funding offer was
accepted and $7,030,100 was received in the June 2007.
$230,100 was allocated in Project Number PR-2609 in the
approved 2007/08 Capital Works Budget to prepare the design and documentation
for these works and the remainder of the funding has been retained in the
restricted grants to be spent as the project progresses over the next two
financial years 2008/09 and 2009/10. In addition, a significant portion of the
project (in the order of $10.0M) will be funded through the relevant Town
Planning Scheme contributions and nearly $1.3M will be pre-funded by Council in
2009/10 from its own sources for the section of the proposed road adjoining the
undeveloped land.
Due to the proposed commencement time of the Stage 1 works
towards the end of the financial year, no progress claims are expected from the
contractor prior to 30 June 2008. Therefore, there is no need to bring forward
any restricted grant in the current financial year. Funds required to complete
the Stage 1 works will be listed in Project Number PR-2609 for Council approval
in the 2008/09 Capital Works Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
ACCEPTS Tender Number 08007 submitted by VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty
Ltd for the Construction of the Ocean Reef Road dual
carriageway extension from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade, Wangara, for the fixed lump sum price of $3,489,566.44, in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in
the tender document.
2.
LISTS funds in Project Number PR-2609 in the 2008/09 Capital Works
Budget for the construction of the Stage 1 works and finalisation of design
& documentation for the Stage 2 works for the Ocean Reef Road extension to
Alexander Drive.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R33/0025V01
File Name: GA Parking Prohibitions Venture Loop
Wangara.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the installation of parking prohibitions in
Venture Loop, Wangara.
Background
Commercial business owner/operators in Venture Loop,
Wangara, have raised concerns that parked vehicles within the street are
blocking access for delivery trucks and semi-trailers to their businesses.
A condition of all developments on
Venture Loop is that the developer provides sufficient parking for staff and
customers for the intended use of the building.
An “Estate Covenant” between
LandCorp and each of the land purchasers also informs developers that street
parking is not permitted in “Enterprise Park”.
Detail
Staff and customers of businesses
along Venture Loop have been observed parking along both sides of the street,
primarily between Innovation Circuit (south) and Success Way, resulting in
restricted access to adjacent businesses.
Venture Loop has been constructed
with a road pavement width of 10m, providing 5m traffic lanes and allowing
heavy haulage vehicles access to the industrial area. Allowing parking on both
sides of the road reduces the trafficable lane width between parked vehicles to
5m which is insufficient for 2-way traffic flow by commercial vehicles. This
results in traffic congestion and restricted manoeuvrability for commercial and
heavy haulage vehicles.
Refer Attachment 1 for a
location plan identifying the subject area.
Consultation
A survey of affected owners and occupiers was commenced on
17 January 2008 with the specified date of Monday, 4 February 2008 for final
returns. The area surveyed and a copy of the survey form is attached (Attachment
2 refers) and a copy of the proposed parking prohibition plan offered for
comment is detailed on Drawing No 2337-2-1 (Attachment 3 refers).
Administration received 11
responses to the survey, out of the 19 sent to owners and occupiers, with three
being in favour of the proposed parking prohibitions, three seeking amendments
and five opposed.
The response rate of 58% to the community survey is
considered above average. The responses however were split 55% / 45%, with six
in favour of some form of parking prohibitions and five opposed.
One of the survey replies requesting amendments to the
proposal, recommended the application of No Parking to both sides of the road
between Innovation Circuit and Success Way. The two other replies requested
reversal of the No Parking and 2Hr Parking zones between the east and west
sides of the road.
|
No.
|
Survey Comment
|
|
1
|
We have about 5 deliveries a day
by 4.5 tonne trucks. We have on 2 occasions rang Council regarding parking
as each tenant by Council approval should have enough allocated bays for
parking for staff. I recommend a survey be done to establish the businesses
not using their allocated bays, as I signed a waiver limiting the number of
employees I can have, this waiver was part of my planning requirements.
Administration response:
Wangara is an industrial
estate that has been designed to allow for heavy haulage vehicle access. The
road pavements in this area are 10 metres wide. Allowing parking on both
sides of the road reduces the remaining traffic lane to 5 metres which is
insufficient for 2-way traffic flow. The result is traffic congestion and
risk taking by impatient drivers.
|
|
2
|
To do this is not conducive to
business – you have offered no alternative.
Administration response:
It is a requirement of all
development applications that sufficient parking be provided onsite to meet
the proposed purpose of the development.
|
|
3
|
We employ up to 12 people and as
the public transport is poor, they have to use their own transport. Where do
you want them to park other than Venture Loop.
Administration response:
It is a requirement of all
development applications that sufficient parking be provided onsite to meet
the proposed purpose of the development.
|
|
4
|
Basically opposite to what you have drawn with no
parking on the majority of the eastern side of venture Loop and 2hr parking
on the majority of the western side of Venture Loop.
Administration response:
Administration agrees.
|
Administration sought comments from the Wanneroo Business
Association (WBA) on the proposed parking prohibitions . The WBA views were:
·
That Parking should be limited to one side of the road in Venture
Loop, given that it is dangerous that trucks of all sizes need a safe passage
through Wangara itself.
·
Developers & Business Owners alike need to cater for their
Employees.
Comment
While those for and against the parking prohibitions are
nearly equal and 42% of owner/occupiers did not respond, Administration
believes that parking prohibitions are warranted. As an industrial area
Wangara has been designed to provide commercial trucking access to the
businesses located there. Locating businesses in the precinct that require
additional parking to that provided on site should not limit their neighbours’
ability to conduct their business.
The proposed parking prohibitions (refer Attachment 4)
have been designed primarily to ensure commercial trucking movement have access
to all the businesses on Venture Loop while providing for some short term
customer parking within the road reserve.
When selecting the preferred side
of the road to allow parking, Administration has endeavoured to provide the
maximum turning circle into the largest number of crossovers. The proposed
parking prohibitions allow time limited parking on the western side of Venture
Loop between Innovation Circuit (North) and Success Way and on the eastern side
between Success Way and Innovation Circuit (South). This is in accordance with
comments from the WBA.
It should be noted that the
continued introduction of time limited parking at a number of locations within
the City and the continuing call for enforcement by affected business is adding
significantly to the work commitment of the City’s Rangers and Safety Services.
Due to these commitments, the proposed parking prohibition
provisions for Wangara will be enforced on an infrequent basis and will mainly
rely on compliance by business staff and customers themselves.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow
the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local
Law 2003(as amended).
Strategic Implications
The proposal to install parking prohibitions on Venture
Loop, Wangara, is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan
2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community
safety
2.4.1 Implement
a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network
and user behaviour.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The provision of parking prohibitions incurs not only the
initial cost of materials and installation of the signs but also the ongoing
cost of maintenance due to vandalism and graffiti. Current estimates for
materials and installation are $100/sign, plus $50 for each additional sign on
the same pole, equating to an appropriate cost of $1,650.
This cost is proposed to be funded from Project No PR –
1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking, Various, for which a total of
$50,000 has been approved by Council in the 2007/2008 Capital Works budget.
The enforcement of parking prohibitions over an increasing
number of sites also impacts on the manpower needs of Ranger Services resulting
in increased staff requirements.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:
1.
APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping” (R5-35) signs in Venture
Loop, Wangara, as shown in Drawing 2337-1-1 (Attachment 4 refers).
2.
APPROVES the installation of “No Parking: 8AM – 6PM,
MON ‑ FRI;
9AM
– 1PM,
SAT”
(R5-41) signs on the eastern side of Venture Loop between Innovation Circuit
(South) and success Way, and on the western side of Venture Loop between
Success Way and Innovation Circuit (North), Wangara, as shown in Drawing
2337-1-1 (Attachment 4 refers).
3.
APPROVES the installation of “2 Hour Parking: 8AM – 6PM,
MON – FRI;
9AM
– 1PM,
SAT”
(R5-2) signs on the western side of Venture Loop between Success Way and
Innovation Circuit, and on the eastern side of Venture Loop between Innovation
Circuit (South) on Success Way, Wangara, as shown in Drawing 2337-1-1
(Attachment 4 refers).
4.
ADVISES Venture Loop business owners and operators of Council’s
decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
LOCATION PLAN – Venture Loop, Wangara
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION – Venture Loop, Wangara
|
File Ref:
|
R33/0025V01 (662621)
|
|
Enquiries:
|
Transport and Traffic 9405 5000
|
17 January 2008
To the Owner/Proprietor
Venture Loop
WANGARA
WA 6065
Dear Sir/Madam
IN03-05/08 Proposed
Parking Prohibitions – Venture Loop, Wangara
As a result of
concerns over parking by local businesses, the City is considering a proposal
to install parking prohibitions on Venture Loop, Wangara. The proposed parking
prohibitions are shown on the enclosed City of Wanneroo Drawing No. 2337-2-1.
The intent of the parking prohibitions is not to raise revenue
or disadvantage businesses but to control parking and ensure access by
commercial vehicles to all properties.
Please complete
the enclosed survey form and return in the reply-paid envelope by close of
business Monday the 4 February 2008. The proposal will then be amended to
reflect the majority view of the businesses and a report presented to Council
for endorsement. It is currently proposed that the report will be presented at
the Council meeting scheduled for 11 March 2008
Should you disagree with the proposal shown on the enclosed drawing
or have any further queries relating to this matter then please contact the
City’s Transport and Traffic Team on telephone 9405 5000.
Yours
sincerely
Ian Barker
MANAGER INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Enc.
(Return by close of
business Monday, 4 February 2008)
The Chief Executive Officer
City of Wanneroo
Locked Bag 1
WANNEROO WA 6946
PARKING PROHIBITIONS – VENTURE LOOP,
WANGARA
As owner/occupier of the property at:
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
I consider that the parking prohibitions as proposed in Drawing
2337-2-1 for Venture Loop, Wangara:
(Please mark one box)
ÿ ARE
UNNECESSARY
ÿ ARE
NECESSARY
ÿ SHOULD BE
AMENDED AS SHOWN ON THE RETURNED DRAWING
Optional:
Other comments:
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
(Please print name below in block letters)
____________________________________ Date:_______________
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION – PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITONS
– Venture Loop, Wangara
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Venture Loop, Wangara
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: R/0002V01
File Name: EA Amendment to Supplementary Auslink
Roads to Recovery Program .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Harminder Singh
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider an amendment to the “Works Schedule” of
projects to be undertaken using funding allocated under the Supplementary
AusLink Roads to Recovery Program (SAR2RP).
Background
In May 2006, as part of the 2006/07 Federal budget
announcements, a one-off grant payment ($720,226) was offered to the City under
the SAR2RP. Council at its meeting on 19 September 2006 endorsed a “Works
Schedule” listing of the projects to be undertaken as part of this Program. The
“Works Schedule” was subsequently amended to fully comply with the Program
guidelines (Item Council Item IN12-10/06 refers). Construction works have been
undertaken for the projects listed in the “Works Schedule” and savings have
been achieved. As per Program guidelines all funds provided are to be fully
expended by 30 June 2009. It is therefore necessary to include more project(s)
to be undertaken utilising the funding received under SAR2RP. This report
considers an amendment to the endorsed “Works Schedule” for the SAR2RP.
Detail
Council considered a report at its meeting on 31 October
2006 (Item IN 12-10/06 refers) and endorsed the following “Works Schedule” for
projects to be undertaken as part of SAR2RP:
|
Road Name
|
Suburb
|
Road Segment (km)
|
Segment Length (m)
|
Estimated Cost
($)
|
Accumulated Total ($)
|
Proposed Year of construction
|
|
Moorpark Avenue
|
Yanchep
|
0.01-1.42
|
1410
|
$247,000
|
$247,000
|
2006/2007
|
|
Russley Grove
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.34
|
340
|
$56,000
|
$303,000
|
2006/2007
|
|
Birnam Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.10
|
100
|
$18,000
|
$321,000
|
2006/2007
|
|
Mauna Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.05
|
50
|
$12,000
|
$333,000
|
2006/2007
|
|
Fullwell Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.03
|
30
|
$8,000
|
$341,000
|
2006/2007
|
|
Burbridge Avenue
|
Koondoola
|
0.00-0.98
|
980
|
$189,000
|
$530,000
|
2007/2008
|
|
Clover Square
|
Girrawheen
|
0.00-0.60
|
600
|
$111,000
|
$641,000
|
2007/2008
|
|
Shelvock Crescent
|
Koondoola
|
0.00-0.39
|
390
|
$79,226
|
$720,226
|
2007/2008
|
|
Total Cost proposed
against the SAR2RP
|
$720,226
|
2006/2007 &
2007/2008
|
The program of works as tabled above was endorsed on this
basis to ensure that the Supplementary AusLink R2R grant is expended prior to
30 June 2009. Council was advised that should there be project carry forwards
and/or cost savings to the program, the expenditure can be finalised in
2008/2009 with additional projects to be endorsed by Council at that time.
Construction works have been undertaken for these projects
and the final expenditures are tabulated below:
|
Road Name
|
Suburb
|
Expenditure
($)
|
Accumulated Total ($)
|
|
Moorpark Avenue
|
Yanchep
|
$181,679
|
$181,679
|
|
Russley Grove
|
Yanchep
|
$47,222
|
$228,901
|
|
Birnam Court
|
Yanchep
|
$15,229
|
$244,130
|
|
Mauna Court
|
Yanchep
|
$8,605
|
$252,735
|
|
Fullwell Court
|
Yanchep
|
$4,923
|
$257,658
|
|
Burbridge Avenue
|
Koondoola
|
$133,618
|
$391,276
|
|
Clover Square
|
Girrawheen
|
$71,319
|
$462,595
|
|
Shelvock Crescent
|
Koondoola
|
$46,757
|
$509,352
|
|
Total funds
expended against the SAR2RP
|
$509,352
|
|
Total SAR2RP
Funds
|
$720,226
|
|
Unexpended
funds available for additional project(s)
|
$210,874
|
Funds ($255,000) have been approved in the 2007/08 Capital
Works Program for undertaking traffic treatment works in Scenic Drive
(PR-1430). A detailed design is currently being finalised and construction
works for this project have been scheduled to be undertaken during May and June
2008. As part of the design process, the surface condition of the road surface
has been investigated and it has been established that Scenic Drive would
require asphalt reseal in the short term. It is estimated that the proposed
traffic treatment and asphalt reseal works in Scenic Drive (from Wanneroo Road
to Church Street) will cost in the order of $485,000. It is preferable to
undertake all works as a single project and therefore, it is proposed to
utilise unexpended funds from the SAR2RP for the proposed works in Scenic
Drive. A budget variation, as explained later in this report, is required to
reflect this change in funding of these projects. After the budget variation,
the total available funding for these works will be $465,874. Costs additional
to the available funding will be charged to the Roads Resurfacing Program
already approved in the 2007/08 budget.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
It is important that the SAR2RP funds are utilised fully
prior to the stipulated date.
Since the Scenic Drive traffic treatment works are
scheduled for 2007/08, it is appropriate that the asphalt reseal works are
undertaken at the same time which would enable savings to be made through
economies of scale and provide a finished product.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of infrastructure using SAR2RP funding is
consistent with the following strategies from the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic
Plan 2006-2021:
“2.4.1
Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the
road network and user behaviour
4.3.1 Develop
and apply asset management principles to support the maintenance and management
of public infrastructure and other assets.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The amendment to the “Works Schedule” for the SAR2RP does
not impose any additional financial implications on the City. However, a budget
variation is required to reflect the amendment in the “Works Schedule”.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
APPROVES the following amended “Works Schedule” for projects to be
undertaken as part of the Federal Government’s Supplementary AusLink Roads to
Recovery Program.
|
Road Name
|
Suburb
|
Road Segment (km)
|
Segment Length (m)
|
Estimated Cost
($)
|
Accumulated Total ($)
|
Proposed Year of construction
|
|
Moorpark Avenue
|
Yanchep
|
0.01-1.42
|
1410
|
$181,679
|
$181,679
|
2006/2007
|
|
Russley Grove
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.34
|
340
|
$47,222
|
$228,901
|
2006/2007
|
|
Birnam Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.10
|
100
|
$15,229
|
$244,130
|
2006/2007
|
|
Mauna Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.05
|
50
|
$8,605
|
$252,735
|
2006/2007
|
|
Fullwell Court
|
Yanchep
|
0.00-0.03
|
30
|
$4,923
|
$257,658
|
2006/2007
|
|
Burbridge Avenue
|
Koondoola
|
0.00-0.98
|
980
|
$133,618
|
$391,276
|
2007/2008
|
|
Clover Square
|
Girrawheen
|
0.00-0.60
|
600
|
$71,319
|
$462,595
|
2007/2008
|
|
Shelvock Crescent
|
Koondoola
|
0.00-0.39
|
390
|
$46,757
|
$509,352
|
2007/2008
|
|
Scenic Drive
|
Wanneroo
|
|
|
$210,874
|
$720,226
|
2007/2008
|
|
Total Cost proposed
against the SAR2RP
|
$720,226
|
2006/2007 &
2007/2008
|
2.
NOTES the following budget variations to reflect the amendment to the
“Works Schedule” for the Federal Government’s Supplementary AusLink Roads to
Recovery Program.
|
Cost Code
|
From
|
To
|
Description
|
|
PR-1398
|
$55,382
|
|
Burbridge Avenue
|
|
PR-1399
|
$39,681
|
|
Clover Square
|
|
PR-1406
|
$32,469
|
|
Shelvock Crescent
|
|
|
$83,342
|
|
Supplementary Roads to Recovery unexpended funds
2006/07
|
|
PR-1430
|
|
$210,874
|
Scenic Drive - Traffic Treatments and Asphalt Reseal
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R22/0071V01
File Name: EA PT01 03 08 Request for Parking Bays
in Glensanda Way Mindarie.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the installation of additional parking bays in
Glensanda Way, Mindarie.
Background
A petition requesting Council consider the installation of
additional parking bays in Glensanda Way, Mindarie, was received by Council at
its meeting of 11 March 2008.
The petition was signed by 13 residents of properties
abutting Glensanda Way, 11 from the 7 unit Strata development on the corner of
Anchorage Drive and Glensanda Way.
The petition requests Council’s consideration for “Parking
bays- Glensanda Way, Mindarie.”
A location map showing the area of interest is shown in Attachment
1.
Detail
Glensanda Way is a local access street conforming to
“Liveable Neighbourhoods” town planning design principles with a 15-metre road
reserve and a sealed pavement width of 6 metres. The property bounded by
Anchorage Drive, Glensanda Way, and Alexandria View contains parking bays with
a capacity for 28 vehicles, while Lydney Lane serves the residential lots from
the rear.
There are seven parking bays in close proximity to the
Strata units at 85 Anchorage Drive. The petitioners are seeking the provision
of additional parking bays along the Glensanda Way frontage, between Lydney
Lane and Anchorage Drive. An aerial map showing the area development and
parking bay layout is shown in Attachment 2.
Consultation
No public consultation was undertaken in the preparation of
this report.
Comment
At subdivision, due to the lot density, Council catered for
potential visitor parking demand by conditioning the development to provide
parking bays that cater for up to 28 vehicles. It is also a condition of
individual lot development that developers provide sufficient parking on site
to meet the needs of the development.
It is not the responsibility of Council to provide
individual visitor parking in residential areas.
Kerbside parking, in accord with the City’s Parking and
Parking Facilities Local Law, is also available in Glensanda Way at the subject
site and at the opposite kerb. As legal parking is available on the existing
road pavement, the construction of parking embayments in Glensanda Way is not
supported.
Statutory Compliance
Embayment and kerbside parking is available in Glensanda
Way in accord with the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003 (as
amended).
Strategic Implications
The recommendations in this report are consistent with the
following City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 goals and objective:
“Governance
4.5 Improve long-term financial viability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The order of cost estimate for the provision of a four bay
parking embayment would be in the order of $25,000 dependent on full design
evaluation and any service relocation.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
DOES NOT SUPPORT the provision of additional parking bays in Glensanda
Way, Mindarie.
2.
ADVISES the Petition Organiser of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
ATTACHMENT
1
LOCATION MAP – Glensanda Way
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
ATTACHMENT
2
Additional parking embayment request
|
|
AERIAL MAP – Glensanda Way
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: R17/0001V01
File Name: FA Road Upgrade Rangeview Road
Landsdale Road Landsdale.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Ian Barker
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider funding options for the upgrade of Landsdale
Road and Rangeview Road.
Background
A notice of motion was considered by Council at its meeting
held on 8th April 2008 (Item MN01-04/08) when it was resolved:
“That Council:-
1.
REQUESTS Administration to seek funding
from existing resources and report tothe next meeting of Council for approval
to:
a) complete
road works and drainage to kerbing stage, for Rangeview Road,Landsdale between
Hepburn Avenue and Landsdale Road sufficient toservice existing homes;
b) make
sufficient works to that portion of Range view Road so as to provide safe
pedestrian access whether temporary or otherwise.
2.
APPROVES all possible steps to expedite
the works.
3.
EXPECTS that no further land is released
for construction of homes where owners are not able to install crossovers due
to lack of sufficient infrastructure.
4.
INSTRUCTS Administration to take all
possible action to recover any unpaiddeveloper costs for Rangeview Road and
replace any re-located funding.”
Three separate developers have subdivided land at the
junction of Rangeview Road and Landsdale Road. As a condition of their
subdivision approval, these developers were each required to fund the upgrade
of the sections of Landsdale Road and Rangeview Roads fronting their properties
and share the cost of constructing a roundabout at the junction.
Two of the developers have completed all subdivisional
works and to allow early release of the subdivided land, have been allowed to
pay to the City of Wanneroo the equivalent cost of the roadworks as a bond.
The third developer, Timescope Pty Ltd has completed the majority of the
subdivisional works, but is unable to fund the scheme contributions and the
cost of its share of the road upgrade costs.
A contractor has been engaged by the three developers for
the roadworks, but is unwilling to carry them out without a guarantee of
funding.
Detail
To obtain clearance of the subdivision and hence allow a
title to be created for the lots which will then allow their sale, the scheme
costs must be paid and either the roadworks completed or a bond or bank
guarantee for the value of the roadworks deposited with the City. The
subdivision forms part of East Wanneroo Development Area Cell 5, for which the
scheme costs for shared infrastructure are currently $30,909.10 for each lot
created.
If the City of Wanneroo was to complete the upgrade of the
roads using its own funds and the two bonds from developers already deposited
with the City, then, without a legal agreement binding the third developer to
refund the money, the City would be unable to recover its expenditure. Under
the Town Planning Act, a developer can recover a percentage of the cost of the
upgrade of a road from another developer who gains the benefit of that
upgrade. This mechanism does not apply however when a road is upgraded by a
Council.
A meeting was held with the Developer of lot 138 on 1st
April 2008 to investigate a mechanism whereby the City could be guaranteed that
if it was to pre fund the expenditure for the roadworks, then it would be
reimbursed from the subsequent sale of the subdivided lots.
Ewing VDM, the Consulting Engineers acting for all three
Developers, has submitted two alternative mechanisms whereby the developed lots
can be released and the roadworks completed.
The first option provides for the gradual release of the
developed lots, with funds from the sale of each released lot being used to
make the payments to allow the release of the next lot, continuing until
sufficient funds have been cleared to allow construction of the roadworks.
This option presents the least financial exposure to the City as only the lots
created in the initial clearance will require deferral of the scheme costs and
the roadworks need not be financed until sufficient funds are available. This
could however result in a delay until the roadworks are commenced as funds have
to be accumulated from the sale of lots. There will also be a significant
increase in the administration required to process multiple clearance
requests. A legal agreement would be prepared to ensure that any scheme costs
that were deferred by the City would be refunded.
As an alternative, to reduce the delay in completing the
roadworks, the City could consider prefunding the developers share of the
roadworks costs.
The second option requires the City of Wanneroo to both
defer the scheme contributions on a larger number of lots and prefund the
developers share of the roadworks. The income received by the Developer would
then be used to refund the cost of the roadworks to the City and to make the
scheme contributions for all of the development. Again a deed would be
prepared to ensure that the City was refunded for the expenditure on the
roadworks and that the scheme costs on all lots would be recovered. This
option would allow the roadworks to be completed at the earliest opportunity.
The deed would be worded such that until all outstanding monies are paid, the
City of Wanneroo would not release further lots and a caveat would be placed on
the sale of the initial batch of lots to guarantee payment.
Consultation
Nil required
Comment
Of these two options, Option 2 is the preferred option as
will allow the roadworks to be started at the earliest opportunity.
The legal agreement would be prepared by the City’s
preferred legal advisor, ensuring that the interests of the City of Wanneroo
were safeguarded.
Statutory Compliance
Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 - Expenditure
from municipal fund not included in annual budget.
Strategic Implications
“Social
2.5 Improve transport options and
connections
2.5.1 Develop
and implement a road network to maximise neighbourhood connectivity and
support a range of transport options.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A budget allocation of $250,000, with matching income will
be required. The Developer’s Engineers have advised that as 60% of the lots
are subject to sales agreements, then it is likely that the City will be
refunded this expenditure within 3-6 months, even if the Contractor commences
work immediately and requires payment before June 2008.
The cost of the legal agreement will be borne by the
Developer. This will include a mechanism for the recoup of interest charges
should there be an excessive delay in the City receiving repayment of either
monies spent or the deferred scheme costs.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
AGREES to enter into a legal agreement with Timescope Pty Ltd whereby
clearance will be issued for an initial batch of residential lots created on
lot 138 Landsdale Road, with the scheme costs under East Wanneroo Development
Area Cell 5 deferred and funds for the upgrade of Landsdale Road and Rangeview
Road to be guaranteed by the City of Wanneroo until such time that repayment
can be made by from the sale of the released lots.
2.
AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to
affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo and execute the legal agreement
between the City and Timescope Pty Ltd.
3.
Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 APPROVES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure of $250,500 for the construction of a
roundabout at the junction of Landsdale Road and Rangeview Road and the
associated upgrade of Landsdale Road and Rangeview Road on either side of the
roundabout
4.
LISTS the upgrade of Landsdale and Rangeview Roads at
an estimated cost of $250,000 in the 2008/2009 Roadworks Capital Works Program
with a matching developer contribution to the cost of the upgrade.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S34/0076
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Chris Hunt
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
File Name: FA Upgrading the Lubrication and
Dispensing Systems in the Fleet Workshop.doc This line will not be printed dont
delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the funding shortfall for the upgrading of the
lubrication and dispensing systems in the Fleet Workshop.
Background
A provision of $18,000 was made in the 2007/2008 Capital
Works budget to fund the upgrade of the Lubricant and Dispensing Systems to the
City’s Fleet Workshop at the Ashby Operations Centre.
Detail
There is requirement to upgrade the City’s Fleet Workshop’s
lubricants supply and dispensing systems to reduce the risk of injury to
workers and to increase operational efficiency.
The workshop lubricant supply system currently does not
cater for the bulk supply of all of the high volume lubricants necessary for
fleet maintenance operations. This requires the workshop staff to frequently
handle and move drums of lubricant, each of which weighs in excess of 180
kilograms. The City’s Occupational Safety and Health Representatives have
issued a Hazard Report Notice specifically requesting immediate improvement to
this requirement for workshop staff to manually handle these drums.
The lubricants dispensing station is located within the
interior of the Fleet Workshop, which is classified as a high risk of injury
work area. This lubricant dispensing station is the only dispensing station at
the Ashby Operations Centre. It is used by the City’s plant, vehicle and
machinery operators to top up fluids as required, following daily pre-start and
post-finish inspections. This results in an undesirably large flow of human
traffic within the Workshop.
During the preparation for 2007/2008 budget proposals, the
services of a lubrication engineer to estimate costs for these upgrades could
not be attained prior to budget submission deadlines. An estimate of $18,000
was included in the budget. Quotations have now been received for the project
and the actual cost for the work will be $48,000.
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with external Lubrication
Engineers, Workshop staff and the Occupational Safety and Health Representative
responsible for the Fleet Workshop operations area.
Comment
There is requirement to minimise the need for workshop
staff to manually handle drums of lubricant on a frequent basis in order to
minimise the risk of personal injury. The Hazard Report raised by the
Occupational Safety and Health Representative on this issue also needs to be
addressed.
There is also a requirement to reduce the current high flow
of non-workshop personnel into the workshop in order to minimise the risk of
personal injury.
The early completion of the recommended upgrades to the
Lubrication and Dispensing System, at a cost of $48,000, will meet these
requirements and will also provide the benefits of improved safety and
increased efficiency in Fleet Workshop operations.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Upgrade to the Fleet Workshop’s Lubricant and Dispensing
Systems is consistent with the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021
outcomes and objectives:
“4.3
- Improve asset management
4.6.2.5 - Review and
evaluate early injury intervention and injury prevention.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Funding of $18,000 for Construct Fuel Dispensing Unit –
Fleet Workshop System (Project No. PR-1315) is provided in the current budget
for this project.
Funding of $30,000 for Upgrade to Plant and Equipment Minor
(Project No. PR-1466), is provided in the current budget. This is a
provisional amount to enable the early implementation of modification works to
satisfy operational and safety concerns. There has been no request to expend
any of these funds this year.
Funding of $48,000 is required to complete works to upgrade
the Workshop’s Lubricant and Dispensing System and the shortfall amount can be
met in full by the transfer of $30,000 from Project No. PR-1466 – Upgrade of
Plant and Equipment Minor.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation:
That Council:-
1.
AGREES to proceed with the Upgrade of the Lubricant and Dispensing Systems
at the Fleet Workshop, noting that there is a $30,000 shortfall in funding.
2.
NOTES the following budget variation to accommodate the shortfall in
funding for this project:
|
EXPENDITURE
Project Number
|
FROM
|
TO
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
Project No. PR-1466
|
$30,000
|
|
Upgrade Plant & Equipment Minor
|
|
Project No. PR-1315
|
|
$30,000
|
Construct Fuel Dispensing Unit - Fleet Workshop
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PR34/0007V01
Responsible Officer: Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tanja Lambe
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 1
File Name: GA Wangara Sump Outcomes of
Contaminated Site Assessment.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the outcomes of the Wangara Sump Contaminated
Site Assessment.
Background
The Wangara Sump is a large compensating basin in Woodvale
(opposite Prindiville Drive, Wangara) receiving untreated stormwater and
industrial runoff from the Wangara Industrial Area. The Wangara Industrial Area
forms a 98 hectare catchment, of which the majority of surfaces are impermeable
with limited on site drainage facilities, which therefore results in untreated
stormwater discharging directly into the sump.
Preliminary water and sediment testing in 2005 and 2006
indicated elevated concentrations of heavy metals, hydrocarbons and nutrients.
Water samples were collected on a monthly basis in 2005 and bimonthly water and
sediment samples were taken during 2006 to establish the baseline data for
water quality entering the sump.
The Wangara Sump drains into the Yellagonga Regional Park’s
(YRP) wetland system via an over/under flow weir, which allows the removal of
some nutrients and heavy metals from the stormwater within the sump prior to it
discharging into the wetland system. Sampling of the discharged water has
shown nutrient and heavy metal concentrations at the outlet have still exceeded
environmental trigger values and therefore the sump is considered to be a major
contributor of pollutants entering into the wetland system. It should be noted
that the retention volume of the sump is insufficient in relation to the
catchment size, causing it to overflow occasionally directly into the YRP in
storm events . Furthermore a significant amount of sediment has accumulated
within the sump over the past 15 years, further reducing the sumps holding
capacity.
In accordance with the Department of Water Ground Water
Atlas, the base level of the sump is at ground water level (23m AHD), which
indicates the potential for direct contact between the stormwater discharge and
the groundwater, which could lead to direct contamination of groundwater. The
site is also recognised as having a high risk of shallow Acid Sulphate Soils
(ASS) or Potential Sulphate Soils (PASS) by the Western Australian Planning
Commission.
It is proposed to carry out maintenance works within the
sump in autumn 2008, which will involve the removal of the accumulated
sediments to increase the storage volume and hence to mitigate adverse impacts
on the YRP wetland system. Due to the recorded pollutants in the stormwater
discharging into the sump, prior to starting the works, a sampling programme to
determine the pollutant concentrations within the sediments is required. These
test results will then be used to determine the measures required to enable the
City to identify an appropriate method of disposing of the sediment, prepare a
work plan to carry out the works in a safe manner and to obtain any required
approvals for the proposed works.
Detail
Quotations for the provision of sampling,
analysis and the preparation of a report on the presence of pollutants in
sediments and a remediation work plan for the Wangara Sump were requested, with
360 Environmental engaged to undertake the work.
Regulatory Guidelines:
The Contaminated assessment was carried
out in accordance with the Department of Environment and Conservation
(2001-2006) Contaminated Site Management Series. The Department of
Environment’s (2003) Assessment for Soil, Sediment and Water and the Australia
and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000) were
used to analyze the results of the testing. The Department of Environment
(1996) Landfill Waste Classification and Waste Definitions were used in
assessing the suitability of the spoil for disposal and to determine its
appropriate landfill classification category.
Testing:
25 boreholes were established within the
sump for testing sediments and soils beneath it. To sample groundwater, three
groundwater bores were installed in early March 2008. Fifty (50) soil samples
were taken and tested for heavy metals, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH),
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (BTEX), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAHs) and Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Three (3) Groundwater samples and
one surface water sample taken within the sump were additionally tested for
physical parameters (e.g. pH, temperature, Dissolved Oxygen) nutrients, Total
Suspended Solids (TSS), surfactants, oil and grease. These samples were
analyzed by a National Association of Testing Authority (NATA) accredited
Analytical Reference Laboratory.
Results and Analysis:
The sample test results were presented to
the City in a report, which was received on 2 April 2008. The Report indicated
that some of the sediments contained concentrations of pollutants, mainly heavy
metals, which exceeded the Department of Environment and Conservation’s Ecological
Investigation Level (EIL) guidelines, but complied with the Health
Investigation Level (HIL-F) guidelines.
A total of Fifteen (15) samples from the
50 samples of sediment collected showed concentrations of metals exceeding the
EIL guidelines for copper, zinc, and lead with a marginal level for chromium.
Hydrocarbon test results for TPH, BTEX
(e.g. benzene, toluene) and PAH (e.g. asphalt, oil and grease) complied with
EIL guidelines and only two samples exceeded HIL-F guidelines for TPH, while
rest complied with the HIL-F guidelines.
All test results for samples taken from
the sand underneath the accumulated sediments were below the laboratory
detection limits and therefore complied with both EIL and HIL-F guidelines.
The groundwater sample concentrations for
heavy metals complied with the Department of Environment and Conservation
(2003) guidelines for Fresh and Drinking Water as presented in the DoE (2003) Assessment
for Soil, Sediment and Water except for aluminium, chromium and arsenic
concentrations, which exceeded the DoE guidelines.
Almost all metal concentration in the
surface water sample complied with the guidelines, zinc being the only
exception, which exceeded the standard for Fresh water, but not Drinking water
guideline levels.
The absence of elevated concentration of
copper, lead and zinc in groundwater samples shows that contaminants in the
sediments are not impacting the groundwater and its quality, despite the use of
site.
The results show that the Hydrocarbon and
surfactant (TPH, BTEX and PAH) concentrations within the groundwater and
surface water were below laboratory detection limits and therefore in
compliance with the guidelines. Low levels of oil and grease were detected in
one groundwater bore (located at the southeast corner) and low levels of
surfactant were in surface water of the sump.
Nutrients and physical parameters complied
with the DoE guidelines, but nutrient levels exceeded Australia and New
Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000) trigger
values.
The landfill classification category for
disposal of the sediment was assessed in accordance with the Department of
Environment (1996) Landfill Waste Classification and Waste Definitions.
Nine sediment samples exceeded the Contaminated threshold values, necessitating
leachate tests for these samples. The leachate test results indicated that all
samples complied with the Concentration Limit values for a Class I landfill,
allowing disposal of the spoil to this class of facility. A Class I landfill
is the lowest category of site, however the disposal of this material at a
Class I landfill will need to be cleared with the landfill operator prior to
disposal.
A copy of the report “Wangara Industrial
Sump, Wanneroo Contamination Site Assessment April 2008” from 360 Environmental
has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Comment
The overall test results show that the stormwater runoff
from Industrial properties has not had an adverse impact on the surrounding
environment and that the site can be considered suitable for continued use,
provided that the appropriate management of sediments is practised and surface
and groundwater monitoring programs are implemented.
It is considered that the remediation of the sump should be
carried out in autumn 2008, while the water table is its lowest and prior the
winter rains. The spoil has landfill classification category of Class I
allowing it to be disposed of at a low level landfill site, subject to the
approval of the operator.
The remediation works will include the removal of sediments
at the eastern end of the sump to restore the original design levels and to
increase the holding capacity of the sump. However, a buffer of sedges (Typha
orientalis) is to be retained at the edge of the open water to reduce flow
velocities and to provide filtering properties to aid sedimentation (Attachment
1 illustrates the proposed works).
In addition, the over-under weir located at the southeast
corner of the sump requires attention, with surrounding vegetation and any
accumulated sediment inside of the weir to be removed to improve its
functionality.
In the future, infrastructure upgrade works in the upper
catchment will be required to improve the quality of the stormwater before it
enters into the sump. In addition, upgrade and improvement works are required
around the sump to increase the storage capacity. This will allow it to better
function as a sedimentation basin and as a part of a Water Sensitive drainage
treatment train with appropriate filtration capacity prior to the water
entering into the Yellagonga Regional Park wetland system.
Statutory Compliance
Environmental Protection Act 1986
Contaminated Site Act 2003
Policy Implications
Environmental Protection (Swan Coastal Plain Lakes)
Policy 1992
Strategy Implications
Improvement and remediation of Wangara Sump is consistent
with the following goals and strategies of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan
206-2021
‘Outcome 1: Environmental
Improve
conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas
1.1.1
Develop and implement a plan to protect the City’s biodiversity
Minimise the incidence and
impact of pollution
1.6.2 Develop a whole of
catchment approach to stormwater management
1.6.3 Develop and implement a
management plan for contaminated sites’
and of the City of Wanneroo’s Smart Growth Strategy 2005
Principles
‘Principle 3 - Long term Health
of the Environment
Smart Growth promotes
development that minimises environmental impact, together with practices that
conserve and enhance natural areas’
Financial Implications
The Infrastructure Maintenance has estimated that the cost
for the proposed excavation and disposal of accumulated sediments is
approximately $240,000, based on acceptance of the material at a Class I
landfill site. These works can be funded from the Engineering Maintenance
Operating account from funds allocated for drainage sump maintenance and
savings from contract hire of street sweepers.
The site will need to be inspected again as recent rains
may prevent access. If this is the case, then the Stage 1 remedial works will
need to be deferred until March 2009.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This will not be printed so do not delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
ACCEPTS the Wangara Sump Contaminated Site Assessment report and its
Recommendations
2.
NOTES that the remediation works comprising removal and disposal of
accumulated sediments within the sump will not be able to commence in April
2008, funded from the Engineering Maintenance budget, as the site is no longer
accessible following recent rain. Provision will be made in the 2008/2009
Maintenance Budget for the works to be carried out in March 2009.
3.
RECOGNISES the high importance of further works to be
carried out within the Wangara catchment in future years to mitigate potential
environmental impacts on the Yellagonga Regional Park and lists funds for
consideration in the draft 5 year Stormwater Drainage Capital Works Programme.
4.
NOTES that a surface and groundwater quality monitoring program will be
carried out at the Wangara sump, with sampling to be carried out on a
bi-annual basis and any deposited sediments managed on an annual basis.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Sediments
are to be removed and disposed
|
|
Buffer
vegetation to be retained
|
|
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Corporate
Services
Finance
File Ref: S13/0002V11
File Name: BA Warrant of Payments For the Period
to 31 March 2008.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Juanita Lee
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for
the month of March 2008, including a statement as to the total amounts
outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list
of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary
Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts
and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts
paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of
the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in March 2008
-
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate
Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid – MARCH
2008
Cheque
Numbers
EFT
Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less
Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
Bank Fees
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
68566 - 68868
707 - 717
|
$2,498,081.27
$4,826,853.86
$7,324,935.13
($4,502.69)
($39,151.01)
$2.50
$7,281,283.93
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank
A/C
Accounts Paid – MARCH
2008
Direct Payments – Advance
Recoup
Direct Payments – Bank
Fees
Direct Payments – Credit
Cards
Direct Payments Total
Payroll
– Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$7,281,283.93
$3,721.71
$77.00
$7,285,082.64
$1,802,169.63
$9,087,252.27
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – MARCH
2008
Cell
1
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$39,151.01
$39,151.01
|
At the close of March 2008 outstanding creditors amounted
to $85,564.52.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of accounts paid by cheque and electronic transfer
in March 2008 and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month
of March 2008 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the
minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the
accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end
and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after
each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared
list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments for
the month of March 2008, as summarised below:-
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director
Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts
Paid – MARCH 2008
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
Bank Fees
RECOUP FROM
MUNICIPAL FUND
|
68566
- 68868
707
- 717
|
$2,498,081.27
$4,826,853.86
$7,324,935.13
($4,502.69)
($39,151.01)
$2.50
$7,281,283.93
|
|
Municipal
Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts
Paid – MARCH 2008
Direct Payments – Advance Recoup
Direct Payments – Bank Fees
Direct Payments – Credit Cards
Direct Payments Total
Payroll – Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$7,281,283.93
$3,721.71
$77.00
$7,285,082.64
$1,802,169.63
$9,087,252.27
|
|
Town
Planning Scheme
Accounts
Paid – MARCH 2008
Cell 1
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$39,151.01
$39,151.01
|
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS MARCH 2008
|
|
PAYMENT
|
DATE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
AMOUNT
|
|
00068566
|
05/03/2008
|
Zipform
|
$9,151.86
|
|
|
|
Reminder Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068567
|
05/03/2008
|
Clarkson Little Athletics
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068568
|
05/03/2008
|
Murphy Group
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068569
|
05/03/2008
|
Sue Sookloll
|
$53.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068570
|
05/03/2008
|
Shemsa Osmancevic
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068571
|
05/03/2008
|
Department of Housing & Works
|
$386,697.77
|
|
|
|
Subdivision Bond Refund Madeley Rise Stage 6
|
|
|
00068572
|
05/03/2008
|
Watson Property Group Woodvale Rise
|
$939,436.48
|
|
|
|
Subdivision Bond Refund Madeley Rise Stage 6
|
|
|
00068573
|
05/03/2008
|
Sarah Devereux
|
$1,060.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068574
|
05/03/2008
|
Sinead Hoare
|
$242.40
|
|
|
|
Facility Hire Refund
|
|
|
00068575
|
05/03/2008
|
APG Homes Pty Ltd
|
$690.55
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Development Application - Not Required
|
|
|
00068576
|
05/03/2008
|
BP Wolvaardt
|
$2,750.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Portion Of Fees Not Expended By The City Processing Amendment
84 To District Planning Scheme No.2 Council Resolved To Not Initiate
Amendment At Its Meeting 12/02/08
|
|
|
00068577
|
05/03/2008
|
GJ Smith
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068578
|
05/03/2008
|
NH Kamani
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068579
|
05/03/2008
|
Quynh Lu
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068580
|
05/03/2008
|
A Pullan
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068581
|
05/03/2008
|
Neelshah
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068582
|
05/03/2008
|
LG Rogers
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068583
|
05/03/2008
|
Donna Hobbs
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068584
|
05/03/2008
|
Jean Reed
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068585
|
05/03/2008
|
Leigh Green
|
$493.30
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068586
|
05/03/2008
|
Lois McLevie
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068587
|
05/03/2008
|
JC Noel
|
$311.40
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund PN174194 24 Midland Elbow - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068588
|
05/03/2008
|
Soroptimist International
|
$319.50
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068589
|
05/03/2008
|
BP Walsh
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068590
|
05/03/2008
|
B & RE Hutchinson
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068591
|
05/03/2008
|
Phyllis Brown
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068592
|
05/03/2008
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068593
|
05/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$227.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068594
|
05/03/2008
|
Alinta Gas
|
$164.50
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For Kingsway International Sports Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
2 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance ($153.80)
|
|
|
00068595
|
05/03/2008
|
Accounts Services Petty Cash
|
$198.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068596
|
05/03/2008
|
Landgate
|
$694.15
|
|
|
|
Land Valuations - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068597
|
05/03/2008
|
Heritage Officer Petty Cash
|
$74.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068598
|
05/03/2008
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$199.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068599
|
05/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$58.80
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068600
|
05/03/2008
|
Landgate
|
$5,819.98
|
|
|
|
Valuations For Rating Services
|
|
|
00068601
|
05/03/2008
|
Water Corporation
|
$806.25
|
|
|
|
Hydrant Works - Various Locations
|
|
|
00068602
|
05/03/2008
|
Synergy
|
$3,614.55
|
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance ($97.25)
|
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City
|
|
|
00068603
|
05/03/2008
|
Telstra
|
$4,475.81
|
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance ($100.00)
|
|
|
|
|
Internet & Data Usage To 09/02/08 – IT Services
|
|
|
00068604
|
05/03/2008
|
Western Power
|
$8,447.00
|
|
|
|
Woodward Circle Upgrade Street Lighting
|
|
|
00068605
|
05/03/2008
|
Kingsway Stadium Petty Cash
|
$188.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068606
|
05/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$188.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068607
|
05/03/2008
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$174.60
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068608
|
05/03/2008
|
Mr C J Arnold
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Reward & Recognition Annual Winner 2007 Customer Service Award
|
|
|
00068609
|
05/03/2008
|
Alchemy Technology
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
SMS Fundamentals Training Attendees Janet & Myrtle - Community
Services
|
|
|
00068610
|
05/03/2008
|
Alloy Engineering & Fabrications
|
$82.50
|
|
|
|
Repair Frame To Fire Tank - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
00068611
|
05/03/2008
|
AMK Fabricators (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$4,548.50
|
|
|
|
Work On Elliot Park Community Facility - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
00068612
|
05/03/2008
|
Art on the Move
|
$132.00
|
|
|
|
Advanced Planning For Lighting Workshop For K Gough & A
McIntosh - Cultural Development
|
|
|
00068613
|
05/03/2008
|
Fines Enforcement Registry
|
$368.00
|
|
|
|
Infringement Notice For Speeding (Employee Has Left City)
|
|
|
00068614
|
05/03/2008
|
Gemtek Automation
|
$335.00
|
|
|
|
Repair To Audio Equipment At Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
00068615
|
05/03/2008
|
Kite Kinetics
|
$864.00
|
|
|
|
Spinning Flowers Workshop - Library Services
|
|
|
00068616
|
05/03/2008
|
Northern Suburbs Bailiff
|
$104.25
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees: Bailiff Fees - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068617
|
05/03/2008
|
Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
2007 Quarter 4 Winner Bulk Waste Team Reward & Recognition Prize
|
|
|
00068618
|
05/03/2008
|
Rosemary Edwards
|
$163.00
|
|
|
|
Balloons For Reward & Recognition Program
|
|
|
00068619
|
05/03/2008
|
Specialised Security Shredding
|
$10.84
|
|
|
|
Security Shredding - Records
|
|
|
00068620
|
05/03/2008
|
State Library of WA
|
$80.30
|
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges - Libraries
|
|
|
00068621
|
06/03/2008
|
Joondalup Court
|
$372.10
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees:
Property Seizure & Sale Order's –
Rating Services
|
|
|
00068622
|
11/03/2008
|
Jay Parmar
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068623
|
11/03/2008
|
Wendy De Nazareth
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068624
|
11/03/2008
|
Alan Notley
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068625
|
11/03/2008
|
Alex Stephen Bishop
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068626
|
11/03/2008
|
Annette Healy
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068627
|
11/03/2008
|
Leanne Turvey
|
$517.74
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N110571 86 Amberton Avenue - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068628
|
11/03/2008
|
P R Hay & R Pasquale
|
$556.85
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N221033 143 Carosa Road -
Overpayment
|
|
|
00068629
|
11/03/2008
|
Edward P Smith
|
$21,870.33
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund PN152360, 152361 & 152362 183, 191 & 201 Kingsway
- Successful Objection To Valuations
|
|
|
00068630
|
11/03/2008
|
R H & S R Pinter
|
$491.29
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund PN170752 12 Benelli Place - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068631
|
11/03/2008
|
Jonce Dimoski
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068632
|
11/03/2008
|
Jodie Goodall
|
$138.18
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Membership Fees For FDC
|
|
|
00068633
|
11/03/2008
|
West Coast Swimming Club
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship Request For Gianna Leone To Participate In 2008 Telstra
Aust Swimming Championships (Beijing Selections) In Sydney
22-29/03/08
|
|
|
00068634
|
11/03/2008
|
Tenpin Bowling Association of WA
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship Request For Kira Cheeseman To Participate In 38Th Aust
Junior National Tenpin Bowling Championships & Presidents Shield In Qld
5-19 April 08
|
|
|
00068635
|
11/03/2008
|
L P & R J McDermott
|
$621.98
|
|
|
|
Rate Refund P/N204486 8 Emperor Way, Yanchep - Refund Of Vendors
Payment Of Rates, Purchaser Already Reimbursed
|
|
|
00068636
|
11/03/2008
|
B J Love
|
$34.50
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N206511 15 Fairbourne App - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068637
|
11/03/2008
|
GT Fibreglass
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Excess Payment For Incident - WN32218
|
|
|
00068638
|
11/03/2008
|
CM Niego
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068639
|
11/03/2008
|
AP Bowles
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068640
|
11/03/2008
|
MC Hendrick
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068641
|
11/03/2008
|
P Farrell
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068642
|
11/03/2008
|
Konrad Thomas Kyaw Sann
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068643
|
11/03/2008
|
R & SL Mather
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068644
|
11/03/2008
|
C & R Martinez
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068645
|
11/03/2008
|
BM Taylor
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068646
|
11/03/2008
|
Chia Min Tang
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068647
|
11/03/2008
|
LB Berger
|
$328.69
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N173215 9 Tobin Place - Pension Rebate
|
|
|
00068648
|
11/03/2008
|
Niaz Sarvari
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068649
|
11/03/2008
|
Kate Pollack
|
$212.40
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068650
|
11/03/2008
|
MA & LD Gillian
|
$660.71
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund PNn215605 1 Meneguz Drive - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068651
|
11/03/2008
|
Bravado Nominees Pty Ltd
|
$82,990.30
|
|
|
|
Subdivision Bond Refund Lots 23-26 Pinjar Road Sinagra
|
|
|
00068652
|
11/03/2008
|
Flora Galoustian
|
$150.60
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N213767 14 Northcliffe Avenue - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068653
|
11/03/2008
|
Ash Planning & Project Management Pty Ltd
|
$5,720.00
|
|
|
|
Supply Of Traffic Management Services - Leisure
|
|
|
00068654
|
11/03/2008
|
Ceiling Manufacturers Of Australia
|
$316.80
|
|
|
|
Mono Coustic Panels - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
00068655
|
11/03/2008
|
FOO HUA Chinese Restaurant
|
$92.40
|
|
|
|
Catering - Perry Road Fire - Fire Services
|
|
|
00068656
|
11/03/2008
|
Granwood Flooring
|
$363.00
|
|
|
|
Inspect Timber Flooring Kingsway Stadium Building Maintenance
|
|
|
00068657
|
11/03/2008
|
Hort Marketing
|
$119.79
|
|
|
|
Plants For Brockwell Park - Parks
|
|
|
00068658
|
11/03/2008
|
Ikea - Cebas P/L
|
$498.00
|
|
|
|
2 X Klippen Sofas & Covers - Youth Services
|
|
|
00068659
|
11/03/2008
|
JAD Enterprises
|
$38.50
|
|
|
|
Reweld Arial Mount Bracket - Lt3 WN32092
|
|
|
00068660
|
11/03/2008
|
KFC - Head Office
|
$142.00
|
|
|
|
Catering Maintenance Day - Fire Services
|
|
|
00068661
|
11/03/2008
|
Kmart Joondalup
|
$94.90
|
|
|
|
Kitchen Equipment - Youth Services
|
|
|
00068662
|
11/03/2008
|
Magnatex International Pty Ltd
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Art & Craft Markets 25/02/08 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
00068663
|
11/03/2008
|
Mindarie Marina
|
$10,000.00
|
|
|
|
Special Events Sponsorship - Economic Development
|
|
|
00068664
|
11/03/2008
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$46,829.92
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For City
|
|
|
00068665
|
11/03/2008
|
Pharmacy Plus Joondalup
|
$127.00
|
|
|
|
Digital Printing & Frames - Fire Services
|
|
|
00068666
|
11/03/2008
|
Resource Unit Children Special Need
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Training CCMS Briefing Sessions 2008 27/02/08 – Attendees C Davies
& J Moyle
|
|
|
00068667
|
11/03/2008
|
Rotary Club of Wanneroo
|
$420.00
|
|
|
|
Elected Members Attendance At Wanneroo Rotary Club
|
|
|
00068668
|
11/03/2008
|
Sanny Ang
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Origami Workshop 5/3/08 - Quinns Adult Day Centre
|
|
|
00068669
|
11/03/2008
|
State Library of WA
|
$25.20
|
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges
|
|
|
00068670
|
11/03/2008
|
The Packaging Place
|
$718.10
|
|
|
|
Gift Boxes - Human Resources
|
|
|
00068671
|
11/03/2008
|
The Play Room Educational Toys
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Tree Bead Frame Table - Libraries
|
|
|
00068672
|
11/03/2008
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$235.44
|
|
|
|
Catering Items For Entertainment Summer Concert 3
|
|
|
|
|
Groceries For Youth Services
|
|
|
00068673
|
11/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Villa Tavern
|
$190.95
|
|
|
|
Catering Items For Entertainment Summer Concert 3
|
|
|
00068674
|
11/03/2008
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068675
|
11/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$331.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068676
|
11/03/2008
|
Alinta Gas
|
$87.60
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City
|
|
|
00068677
|
11/03/2008
|
Building & Construction Industry
|
$46,850.92
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction Levy Collections - Finance
|
|
|
00068678
|
11/03/2008
|
Alan Green
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Buses
|
|
|
00068679
|
11/03/2008
|
Hainsworth Community Centre Petty Cash
|
$130.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068681
|
11/03/2008
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$340.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068682
|
11/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$124.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068683
|
11/03/2008
|
Landgate
|
$6,036.34
|
|
|
|
Valuations - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068684
|
11/03/2008
|
Water Corporation
|
$274.50
|
|
|
|
Meter Repair Costs (Waste)
|
|
|
00068685
|
11/03/2008
|
Zurich Client Service
|
$235.38
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
00068686
|
11/03/2008
|
M Heckler
|
$307.60
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Buses
|
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Podiatry Clinics
|
|
|
00068687
|
11/03/2008
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$2,525.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
00068688
|
11/03/2008
|
Synergy
|
$33,288.50
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies For City
|
|
|
00068689
|
11/03/2008
|
Telstra
|
$158.11
|
|
|
|
Internet Services - 26/01-25/02/08 – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Phone Charges 0488901302-03.03.08
|
|
|
00068690
|
11/03/2008
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$241.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068691
|
11/03/2008
|
Australia Post
|
$270.00
|
|
|
|
Post Box - Locked Bag (01/04/08-31/03/09) - Records
|
|
|
00068692
|
11/03/2008
|
Mary Adamson
|
$115.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Day Care Centres
|
|
|
00068693
|
11/03/2008
|
Mrs L C Hocking
|
$45.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payments - Day Care Centres
|
|
|
00068694
|
11/03/2008
|
Western Power
|
$956.00
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Design Fee L500 Hidden Valley Retreat
|
|
|
00068695
|
11/03/2008
|
Carol Politis
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payments - Day Care Centres
|
|
|
00068696
|
11/03/2008
|
Janice Lewis
|
$130.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payments - Day Care Centres
|
|
|
00068697
|
11/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$134.70
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068698
|
11/03/2008
|
PBTL - Lifetime Superannuation Fund
|
$70.61
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
00068699
|
11/03/2008
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$387.11
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068700
|
11/03/2008
|
Mr D M Krauskopf
|
$2,748.85
|
|
|
|
Payroll: Eligible Termination Payment - Human Resources
|
|
|
00068701
|
11/03/2008
|
Mrs L C Gray
|
$92.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Fuel WN32411 - Rangers
|
|
|
00068702
|
12/03/2008
|
Joondalup Court
|
$409.85
|
|
|
|
Costs Associated With Property Seizure - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068703
|
14/03/2008
|
L Wallis
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068704
|
18/03/2008
|
Children in Action
|
$1,650.00
|
|
|
|
Community Development Funding For Oct 07 - Easter Camp
|
|
|
00068705
|
18/03/2008
|
Celebration Homes
|
$9,140.20
|
|
|
|
Refund Building Application Fee - Paid Twice In Error
|
|
|
00068706
|
18/03/2008
|
G A & D Regan
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N192559 7 Passive Trail - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068707
|
18/03/2008
|
A F Tucker
|
$723.71
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N217108 45 Gemini Way - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068708
|
18/03/2008
|
Marcello Perini
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068709
|
18/03/2008
|
M P Silcock & A P A Hay
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068710
|
18/03/2008
|
Gerhard Willem Bakker
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068711
|
18/03/2008
|
Stephen Joseph Merrick
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068712
|
18/03/2008
|
Jeff Finlay
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068713
|
18/03/2008
|
Nakola Majstorovic
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068714
|
18/03/2008
|
Alex Whyte
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
First Prize " Stunted Growth " Youth Art Competition - Your
Snapshots
|
|
|
00068715
|
18/03/2008
|
Kate Lambe
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Second Prize " United As One " Youth Arts Competition - Your
Snapshots
|
|
|
00068716
|
18/03/2008
|
Frederik Sentow
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Third Prize " Jumping Jon " Youth Arts Competition - Your
Snapshots
|
|
|
00068717
|
18/03/2008
|
Roger Bernard Baseri
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068718
|
18/03/2008
|
Sokha Pen
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068719
|
18/03/2008
|
Alan Murray
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068720
|
18/03/2008
|
Amirrullah Ahmad
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068721
|
18/03/2008
|
Mudathir Sid Ahmed
|
$340.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068722
|
18/03/2008
|
D & M Brown
|
$425.70
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N196442 51 Davenport - Paid Wrong Account
|
|
|
00068723
|
18/03/2008
|
Haysam Kheiriddine Jabado
|
$217.33
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund P/N174493 36 Pridmore Glen - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068724
|
18/03/2008
|
ABC Learning Centres/Belgrade Park
|
$74.76
|
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00068725
|
18/03/2008
|
Cockburn Party Hire
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of BBQ's 29/03/08 For Citizenship Ceremony
|
|
|
00068726
|
18/03/2008
|
Hero Pty Ltd
|
$3,076.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Development Application
|
|
|
00068727
|
18/03/2008
|
Cono Terribile Maria Terribile
|
$621.00
|
|
|
|
Refund Of Development Application C
|
|
|
00068728
|
18/03/2008
|
AITPM Inc
|
$577.50
|
|
|
|
Corporate Membership Fees - 1/4/08-31/3/09 - Infrastructure Planning
|
|
|
00068729
|
18/03/2008
|
Australasian Performing Right Assoc.
|
$156.07
|
|
|
|
Music License Fee - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
00068730
|
18/03/2008
|
Big W
|
$123.03
|
|
|
|
Supplies For The Vanessa Amarossi Concert - Cultural Development
|
|
|
00068732
|
18/03/2008
|
Bob Cooper Outdoor Education Pty Ltd
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Snake Awareness Workshop - Health
|
|
|
00068733
|
18/03/2008
|
Choice
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Magazine Subscription For Choice - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
00068734
|
18/03/2008
|
Computronics Corporation Ltd
|
$561.00
|
|
|
|
Scoreboard Service - Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
00068735
|
18/03/2008
|
Cut Price Imports
|
$1,815.00
|
|
|
|
Aussie Caps For Citizenship Ceremonies/ Australia Day
|
|
|
00068736
|
18/03/2008
|
DA & HM Pratt
|
$209.00
|
|
|
|
Directional Arrows - Fleet
|
|
|
00068737
|
18/03/2008
|
Dekal's Craft House
|
$321.00
|
|
|
|
Craft Supplies For Adult Day Services
|
|
|
00068738
|
18/03/2008
|
Documentary Services Pty Ltd
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Company Searches - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068739
|
18/03/2008
|
DVM Fencing
|
$577.50
|
|
|
|
Repair Sump Fence At Kemp Street
|
|
|
00068740
|
18/03/2008
|
Edgewater Veterinary Hospital
|
$527.65
|
|
|
|
Veterinary Costs - Euthanasia 11 Dogs & Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
00068741
|
18/03/2008
|
EECW Pty Ltd
|
$390.00
|
|
|
|
Conference - Communities At Work: A Showcase Of Stars 01-02/05/2008
Perth – Attendee H Gordon
|
|
|
00068742
|
18/03/2008
|
Facet
|
$35.00
|
|
|
|
Conference - Munda Biddi Trail Foundation 20/03/08 -Attendee D Wood
|
|
|
00068743
|
18/03/2008
|
FOO HUA Chinese Restaurant
|
$74.40
|
|
|
|
Catering At Yandella Prom Fire - Fire Services
|
|
|
00068744
|
18/03/2008
|
Harvey Metals
|
$3,531.00
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Cabinet - Kingsway Netball - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repair Cabinet Doors At Carramar Golf Course - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
00068745
|
18/03/2008
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd
|
$121.55
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
00068746
|
18/03/2008
|
Hort Marketing
|
$18.48
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
00068747
|
18/03/2008
|
Kott Gunning Lawyers
|
$605.25
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees: Property Services
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: Rangers
|
|
|
00068748
|
18/03/2008
|
Landmark
|
$712.97
|
|
|
|
Equipment - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
00068749
|
18/03/2008
|
Landsdale IGA
|
$196.79
|
|
|
|
Groceries For Community Services
|
|
|
00068750
|
18/03/2008
|
Local Government Managers Aust.
|
$1,034.00
|
|
|
|
LGMA March 2008 Annual State Conference Registration - Attendee J
McNamara
|
|
|
00068751
|
18/03/2008
|
Logiudice Property Group
|
$376.80
|
|
|
|
Property Management Fees - 10 Mindarie Drive Quinns Rocks - Contracts
& Property
|
|
|
00068752
|
18/03/2008
|
Malaga Mowers
|
$262.50
|
|
|
|
Parts - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
00068753
|
18/03/2008
|
Maxwell's Collection Pty Ltd
|
$2,420.00
|
|
|
|
DVD's - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
00068754
|
18/03/2008
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$142,953.75
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For City
|
|
|
00068755
|
18/03/2008
|
Non Organic Disposals
|
$1,072.50
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
00068756
|
18/03/2008
|
Northern Suburbs Bailiff
|
$96.00
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees: Rating Services
|
|
|
00068757
|
18/03/2008
|
OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd
|
$8,210.09
|
|
|
|
Balomatic Baling Wire - Waste Services
|
|
|
00068758
|
18/03/2008
|
Peet & Company Limited
|
$43,066.11
|
|
|
|
Pinjar Road - Civil Works/Construction/Realignment Fees
|
|
|
00068759
|
18/03/2008
|
Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd
|
$97.00
|
|
|
|
Employment Law Handbook - Human Resources
|
|
|
00068760
|
18/03/2008
|
Repco Auto Parts
|
$85.51
|
|
|
|
Brake Reline - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
00068761
|
18/03/2008
|
Sanny Ang
|
$132.00
|
|
|
|
Origami Workshop 06-07.03.08 - Adult Day Care Services
|
|
|
00068762
|
18/03/2008
|
The Butterfly Foundation
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Training 4 Youth Activity Officers Gibson, Arthur, Burton, Wheldon
|
|
|
00068763
|
18/03/2008
|
The Sunday Times
|
$4,400.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising Of Art Awards - Cultural Development
|
|
|
00068764
|
18/03/2008
|
Total Steel of Aust Pty Ltd
|
$222.97
|
|
|
|
Steel For Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Steel For Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
00068765
|
18/03/2008
|
WA Limestone Company
|
$786.06
|
|
|
|
Limestone Delivery For Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Limestone Delivery For Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
00068766
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$413.42
|
|
|
|
Groceries For Youth Services
|
|
|
00068767
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Motorcycles
|
$170.01
|
|
|
|
Prizes For Paloma Skate Competition
|
|
|
00068768
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Villa Tavern
|
$1,090.29
|
|
|
|
Beverages For Elected Members Bar Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Platters For Summer Concert 3 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
00068769
|
18/03/2008
|
Councillor F Cvitan
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
00068770
|
18/03/2008
|
Councillor Colin Hughes
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
00068771
|
18/03/2008
|
Cr Dorothy Newton
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
00068772
|
18/03/2008
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates
|
$283.33
|
|
|
|
Payment Of Rates P/N136156 - Cr D Newton ($83.33)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Of Rates P/N150893 - Mayor J Kelly ( $200.00)
|
|
|
00068773
|
18/03/2008
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Recognition - Farewell Function For Fleur Niemann -
Ranger Services
|
|
|
00068774
|
18/03/2008
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068775
|
18/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$300.20
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068776
|
18/03/2008
|
Alinta Gas
|
$103.30
|
|
|
|
Gas
Supplies For City
|
|
|
00068777
|
18/03/2008
|
Amp Flexible Lifetime Super Fund
|
$986.95
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 14/03/08
|
|
|
00068778
|
18/03/2008
|
Jenolan Way Community Centre Petty Cash
|
$95.50
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068779
|
18/03/2008
|
Conservation Council of WA
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Seminar "WA's Water Future" 18/03/08 – Attendee
R Maccario
|
|
|
00068780
|
18/03/2008
|
Customer Service Council Inc
|
$88.00
|
|
|
|
Breakfast Workshop 11/03/08 - Attendees D Allen & S Steele
|
|
|
00068781
|
18/03/2008
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$142.50
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068782
|
18/03/2008
|
Michael Hayes
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Key Holder - Cockman House
|
|
|
00068783
|
18/03/2008
|
Mobile Library Petty Cash
|
$94.10
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068784
|
18/03/2008
|
Optus
|
$21.49
|
|
|
|
Mobile 0412719909
– 21/01/08-20/02/08 –
Waste Services
|
|
|
00068785
|
18/03/2008
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$355.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068786
|
18/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$172.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068787
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$250.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068788
|
18/03/2008
|
Water Corporation
|
$1,709.65
|
|
|
|
Water Charges For City
|
|
|
00068789
|
18/03/2008
|
Synergy
|
$221,563.75
|
|
|
|
Electricity Supplies For City
|
|
|
|
|
Street Lighting – 24/01/08-24/02/08
|
|
|
00068790
|
18/03/2008
|
Department Of The Premier And Cabin
|
$103.95
|
|
|
|
Government Gazette Advertising - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068791
|
18/03/2008
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates
|
$190.44
|
|
|
|
Cr Steffens Travel Allowance For Feb08 Paid To P/N126238 Rates
|
|
|
00068792
|
18/03/2008
|
HOSTPLUS Superannuation Fund
|
$162.37
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068793
|
18/03/2008
|
WESTSCHEME
|
$1,275.52
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068794
|
18/03/2008
|
MLC Nominees Pty Limited
|
$289.26
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068795
|
18/03/2008
|
The Industry Superannuation Fund
|
$321.74
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068796
|
18/03/2008
|
1OOF Portfolio Service Superannuation
|
$106.33
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068797
|
18/03/2008
|
Hainsworth Programme Development Petty Cash
|
$85.70
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068798
|
18/03/2008
|
Integra Super
|
$609.16
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068799
|
18/03/2008
|
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund
|
$127.06
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068800
|
18/03/2008
|
MTAA Superannuation Fund
|
$280.18
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068801
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$58.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068802
|
18/03/2008
|
AustralianSuper
|
$870.78
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068803
|
18/03/2008
|
TOWER Australia Limited - ARC Master Trust
|
$101.29
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068804
|
18/03/2008
|
REST Superannuation
|
$419.91
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068805
|
18/03/2008
|
Asgard Elements Super
|
$208.60
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068806
|
18/03/2008
|
Printing Industry Superannuation Fund
|
$331.04
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068807
|
18/03/2008
|
PBTL - Lifetime Superannuation Fund
|
$138.09
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068808
|
18/03/2008
|
Health Super Fund
|
$101.47
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068809
|
18/03/2008
|
UniSuper Limited
|
$433.73
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Contributions
|
|
|
00068810
|
18/03/2008
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$386.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068811
|
18/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Podiatry Cash Float
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Replacement Of Cash Float Stolen 19/02/08 (In Break)
|
|
|
00068812
|
18/03/2008
|
Bruce Thompson
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus
|
|
|
00068813
|
25/03/2008
|
Ximena Takapu
|
$1,060.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068814
|
25/03/2008
|
JP Fraser
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00068815
|
25/03/2008
|
Catherine Brodie
|
$18.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068816
|
25/03/2008
|
Cedar Woods Property P/L
|
$592.93
|
|
|
|
Rate Refund P/N218900 19 Porzana Bvd - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068817
|
25/03/2008
|
Cedar Woods Property P/L
|
$70.75
|
|
|
|
Rate Refund P/N221683 40 Meneguz Drive - Overpayment
|
|
|
00068818
|
25/03/2008
|
Christine Hammond
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068819
|
25/03/2008
|
ATI Martial Arts
|
$50.07
|
|
|
|
Facility Hire Refund
|
|
|
00068820
|
25/03/2008
|
Karen Corkhill
|
$565.00
|
|
|
|
Facility Hire Refund
|
|
|
00068821
|
25/03/2008
|
Rhys Ross
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Second Prize "Deaths Call" Youth Arts Competition - Young
Writers Prose Under 16 Years
|
|
|
00068822
|
25/03/2008
|
Evan Price
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Third Prize "The People That Never Gave Anything" - Youth
Arts Comp - Young Writers Prose Under 16 Yrs
|
|
|
00068823
|
25/03/2008
|
Katherine Turpin
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
First Prize "Friends Forever" Youth Arts Comp - Youth Writers
Prose Under 16 Years
|
|
|
00068824
|
25/03/2008
|
Hannah Jane Ray
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
First Prize "Loves Methodical Presuppositions" Youth Arts
Comp - Young Writers Prose 16 Yrs & Over
|
|
|
00068825
|
25/03/2008
|
Hannah Jane Ray
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Second Prize "Love Methodical Presuppositions" Youth Arts
Comp Young Writers - Poetry 16 Yrs & Over
|
|
|
00068826
|
25/03/2008
|
Bronte Reeves
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
First Prize "Thoughts On A Family" Youth Art Comp - Young
Writers - Poetry Under 16 Years
|
|
|
00068827
|
25/03/2008
|
Caitlin Reeves
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Second Prize "Wind" Youth Arts Comp - Young Writers
|
|
|
00068828
|
25/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Cricket Club
|
$106.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00068829
|
25/03/2008
|
Tanaya Harper
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
First Prize 'An Inevitable Truth’ Youth Arts Comp - Young Writers -
Poetry 16 Years & Over
|
|
|
00068830
|
25/03/2008
|
Adelphi Tailoring Company
|
$2,516.80
|
|
|
|
Rangers Uniforms
|
|
|
00068831
|
25/03/2008
|
Alchemy Technology
|
$9,625.00
|
|
|
|
Additional SMS Licences – IT Services
|
|
|
00068832
|
25/03/2008
|
Australian Communications & Media
|
$537.00
|
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - Land Mobile Apparatus 11/04/08-11/04/09 – IT Services
|
|
|
00068833
|
25/03/2008
|
Bev Manning
|
$280.00
|
|
|
|
Aerobic Classes - Yanchep Community Centre
|
|
|
00068834
|
25/03/2008
|
C & EM Harmer
|
$140.80
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - CEO's Office
|
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals – Mayor’s Office
|
|
|
00068835
|
25/03/2008
|
Carol McDougall
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Catering - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
00068836
|
25/03/2008
|
Creating Communities Australia Pty Ltd
|
$18,590.81
|
|
|
|
Pearsall Hocking Community Centre Study
|
|
|
00068837
|
25/03/2008
|
Extensive Paving Services
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Paving Services - Hainsworth Community Centre
|
|
|
00068838
|
25/03/2008
|
Joan Roberson
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Art Class Week 1-4 Term 2 - Wanneroo Recreation Centre
|
|
|
00068839
|
25/03/2008
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$6,352.68
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For City
|
|
|
00068840
|
25/03/2008
|
The Hunters Den
|
$763.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Marlin Rifle Ammunition, Cleaning Kit & Gun Bag -
Rangers
|
|
|
00068841
|
25/03/2008
|
WA Limestone Company
|
$84,292.51
|
|
|
|
Bitumen/Limestone Delivery - Engineering Construction
|
|
|
00068842
|
25/03/2008
|
WA Police Service
|
$345.00
|
|
|
|
Corporate Firearms Licence (Original) - Ranger Services
|
|
|
00068843
|
25/03/2008
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$121.06
|
|
|
|
Groceries For Youth Services
|
|
|
00068844
|
26/03/2008
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068845
|
26/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$308.95
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068846
|
26/03/2008
|
Alinta Gas
|
$46.35
|
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00068847
|
26/03/2008
|
Amp Flexible Lifetime Super Fund
|
$257.38
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
00068848
|
26/03/2008
|
Building & Construction Industry
|
$25,045.34
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction Levy 01/03/08-15/03/08 - Finance
|
|
|
00068849
|
26/03/2008
|
Landgate
|
$658.75
|
|
|
|
Land Enquiries - Rating Services
|
|
|
00068850
|
26/03/2008
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$29.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068851
|
26/03/2008
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$60.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068852
|
26/03/2008
|
Landgate
|
$3,680.90
|
|
|
|
Valuations - Rates Services
|
|
|
00068853
|
26/03/2008
|
WA Electoral Commission
|
$182,798.24
|
|
|
|
Elections Conduct Of 07 Local Govt Election
|
|
|
00068854
|
26/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$70.20
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068855
|
26/03/2008
|
Water Corporation
|
$4,735.10
|
|
|
|
Water Charges For City
|
|
|
00068856
|
26/03/2008
|
Youth Projects Petty Cash
|
$61.15
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068857
|
26/03/2008
|
Zurich Client Service
|
$235.38
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
00068858
|
26/03/2008
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$2,490.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 14/03/08
|
|
|
00068859
|
26/03/2008
|
Synergy
|
$7,394.55
|
|
|
|
Electricity Supplies For City
|
|
|
00068860
|
26/03/2008
|
Telstra
|
$69.95
|
|
|
|
Bigpond Account – IT Services
|
|
|
00068861
|
26/03/2008
|
Western Power
|
$2,099.65
|
|
|
|
Repair Pole At Jacaranda Road Wanneroo
|
|
|
00068862
|
26/03/2008
|
Dept For Planning And Infrastructure
|
$467.05
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Ownership Searches Jul-Sep 07 - Rangers
|
|
|
00068863
|
26/03/2008
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$79.65
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068864
|
26/03/2008
|
Asgard Elements Super
|
$52.15
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions F/Ending 07/03/2008
|
|
|
00068865
|
26/03/2008
|
PBTL - Lifetime Superannuation Fund
|
$67.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
00068866
|
26/03/2008
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$247.30
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00068867
|
26/03/2008
|
Swan Alcoa Landcare Program
|
$1,571.11
|
|
|
|
Unspent Funds Return - Grant - Conservation
|
|
|
00068868
|
28/03/2008
|
Australia Post
|
$2,422.29
|
|
|
|
Postage Charges - Lodgements For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques
|
$2,498,081.27
|
|
ELECTRONIC
TRANSFER LISTING
|
|
00000707
|
05/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
3D Networks (Australia) Pty Ltd
|
$6,050.00
|
|
|
|
Switch 5520 -IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Academy Clothing
|
$1,214.40
|
|
|
|
Uniforms - Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service
|
$170.00
|
|
|
|
Locking Services - Hainsworth Leisure Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving
|
$1,892.20
|
|
|
|
Ocean Keys Blvd & Key Largo
|
|
|
|
|
ALGWA (WA)
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
International Women's Day 2008 Breakfast - Attendees F Bentley, K
Caple, M Brennand, V Barry, J McNamara, C Forbes, K Christoffelsz
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$611.19
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Angus & Robertson Pty Ltd
|
$23.39
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
APS Commission
|
$950.00
|
|
|
|
Registration
For 2008 Regional Directors Conference – Attendee K Caple
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$618.96
|
|
|
|
Cash Collections - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong Energy
|
$353.10
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Recruitment
|
$3,443.78
|
|
|
|
Labour Hire Services W/E 10/02/08 - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Australasian Seal Co.
|
$1,578.83
|
|
|
|
Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Protection Services
|
$2,795.87
|
|
|
|
Security For Summer Concert Series - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres
|
$5,426.74
|
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$554.30
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN32339
|
|
|
|
|
Bolinda Publishing Pty Ltd
|
$1,174.57
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment
|
$47.85
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Briggate Medical Company
|
$2,642.64
|
|
|
|
Podiatry Drill - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$720.51
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$64.36
|
|
|
|
Taxi Fares - CACP Clients Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd
|
$137.48
|
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Elected Members Bar Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$4,330.36
|
|
|
|
Sand - Parks Maintenance & Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
CBC Bearings WA Pty Ltd
|
$1,088.26
|
|
|
|
Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Central TAFE - Financial Services Branch
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Cert IV In Local Government For G Babudri
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA
|
$72.60
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
City of Stirling
|
$12.10
|
|
|
|
Lost Book Charges - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$5,167.62
|
|
|
|
Light Tower For Summer Concert Charnwood Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete Kibble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Coffey Environments Pty Ltd
|
$992.75
|
|
|
|
Flora & Vegetation Assessment Flynn Drive Wanneroo - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Flora Survey For Neerabup Industrial Area - Contracts & Property
|
|
|
|
|
Community Newspapers
|
$18,166.63
|
|
|
|
Advertising For Jan08
|
|
|
|
|
Computelec Pty Ltd
|
$3,392.40
|
|
|
|
Acrobat Professional 8Win License Government
|
|
|
|
|
Publisher 2007 English OLP NP Local Govt
|
|
|
|
|
Photoshop Extended CS3 10 Win License Government
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Express
|
$18,931.01
|
|
|
|
Stationery Purchases For Jan08
|
|
|
|
|
Coventrys
|
$233.38
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Dalcon Construction Pty Ltd
|
$19,003.05
|
|
|
|
Progress Payment #3 Animal Care Centre Addition
|
|
|
|
|
Davis Langdon Australia
|
$17,325.00
|
|
|
|
Building Assessment - Admin Building - Strategic Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Denmoss Holdings
|
$2,860.00
|
|
|
|
Erect & Dismantle Stage For Summer Concert
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$22,676.23
|
|
|
|
Supply/Lay Footpath - Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Driveshaft Balancing Services
|
$480.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Driveshaft - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$2,167.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble For Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$730.62
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd
|
$619.30
|
|
|
|
Parts Washer Service - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services Pty Ltd
|
$10,867.45
|
|
|
|
Supply New Extinguishers - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Waste Vehicle Extinguishers
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Detectors Maintenance At Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise
|
$292.05
|
|
|
|
Location Of Services Ocean Drive Quinns Rocks - Engineering
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Foodlink Food Service
|
$770.99
|
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Forpark Australia
|
$18,427.20
|
|
|
|
Install Play Equipment At Lake Joondalup Kindy - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Frigrite Refrigiration Pty Ltd
|
$2,178.00
|
|
|
|
Final Claim - Exhaust Fan For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Geoffs Tree Service
|
$1,526.25
|
|
|
|
Remove
Palm - Ocean Reef Road
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prune Trees - Templeton Park
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$4,125.00
|
|
|
|
Mechanical Services Maintenance Spec - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Depot Security Gates - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia
|
$9,044.20
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal From Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu
|
$151,600.64
|
|
|
|
New Vehicles Toyota Corolla Sedan x 5 ($21,808.29 ea)
|
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Toyota Presara Sedan ($42,559.19)
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd
|
$590.25
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Icon Office Technology
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Photocopier - Banksia Grove Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable
|
$4,468.75
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour For Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Subscription Renewal Of Systems Plus TP 30/06/08 - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$137.50
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees -Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust Pty Ltd
|
$17.67
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Kingsley
|
|
|
|
|
LGCSAWA
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
2008 Corporate Membership - K Christoffelsz
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd
|
$2,724.41
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$1,168.22
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Company
|
$105.60
|
|
|
|
Bond Brake Shoes - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Marquee Magic
|
$1,249.60
|
|
|
|
Marquee & Chair Hire - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$4,470.40
|
|
|
|
Heavy Vehicle Hire - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors
|
$902.00
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Services
|
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd
|
$74.07
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Glass
|
$1,054.37
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$157.85
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$1,035.78
|
|
|
|
Investigate Erosion - Quinns Beach
|
|
|
|
|
National Hire Trading Pty Limited
|
$682.10
|
|
|
|
Equipment Hire For Three Times Theatre - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$286.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Control Services - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$357.50
|
|
|
|
Repair Windscreen To WN31916
|
|
|
|
|
Optima Press
|
$482.90
|
|
|
|
Printing Of MRF Docket Books - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands
|
$108.35
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Concert Sound
|
$7,480.00
|
|
|
|
Mental As Anything Summer Concert - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Expo Hire
|
$551.55
|
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Wood Pty Ltd
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Fencing - Mindarie Harbour
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Motors of Wanneroo
|
$88.95
|
|
|
|
Repairs - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$3,587.89
|
|
|
|
Alarm & Monitoring Services At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Limestone Testing Ocean Reef Road - Engineering Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services
|
$3,550.06
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For Jan08
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Life Saving Society Australia
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Lifeguard Requalification For B Depiazz - Leisure
|
|
|
|
|
Sanax St Andrews Pharmacy
|
$275.63
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Spotless Services Australia Limited
|
$180.00
|
|
|
|
512K Wireless Internet Access - Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$1,207.78
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Stomp Pty Ltd
|
$399.45
|
|
|
|
Books For Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Stopmaster Brakes
|
$668.14
|
|
|
|
Front/Rear Brake Relining - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company
|
$772.20
|
|
|
|
Various Signs - Engineering Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Taskers
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Install 2 Flagpoles At Banksia Grove Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Irrigation Imports
|
$1,804.00
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Equipment - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Thiess Pty Ltd
|
$515.63
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Cherry Picker - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Muirhead & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Partnership With Aboriginal People 7- 8 April 2008 - Attendees P Rogers
& M Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Total Eden Watering Systems
|
$12.76
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
T-Quip
|
$345.75
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Tree Guild of WA Inc
|
$137.50
|
|
|
|
Membership 07/08 - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$3,747.03
|
|
|
|
Fertilise &Weed Control At Various Locations - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Uniforms @ Work
|
$5,514.30
|
|
|
|
Uniforms For Councillors
|
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies
|
$125.84
|
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc
|
$60,702.06
|
|
|
|
Advertising For Mar08 - Human Resources
($56,406.56)
|
|
|
|
|
WALGA Breakfast With CCC Commissioner - Attendees J McNamara, K Caple
& C Johnson ($198.00)
|
|
|
|
|
3rd WAAMI Visit 28/11/07 - D Blair ($4,097.50)
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery
|
$51.99
|
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators
|
$2,515.15
|
|
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
Newspapers - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$8,785.22
|
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware
|
$1,238.26
|
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$12,832.97
|
|
|
|
Plumbing Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Name Badges - Building & Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Waste Master
|
$38.28
|
|
|
|
Parts - Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal
|
$3,379.20
|
|
|
|
Induction Of New Councillors Oct07 – Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
WT Partnership Australia Pty Ltd
|
$3,300.00
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion Refurbishment Surveying Services
|
|
|
|
|
Xp Software
|
$2,595.00
|
|
|
|
Xpsuite Special Edition 1 Year Instalment Of 3 Year Contract -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Zipform
|
$492.72
|
|
|
|
Interim Rate Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000708
|
05/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austral Mercantile Collections Pty Ltd
|
$46.31
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees: Debt Recovery Jan & Feb08 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments
|
$2,753.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions: Non Cycle Pay
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Annabel Craig
|
$78.18
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Equipment For Smart Growth Workshop 25/2/08
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Anthony Verteramo
|
$121.37
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Study Assistance
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Mark Dickson
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Home Internet Usage For Feb08 - Smart Growth
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Katie Smith
|
$60.25
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Fuel For Cow Vehicle
|
|
|
|
|
National Tax Manager
|
$132.00
|
|
|
|
FBT Subscription - Finance Services
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Del Borrello
|
$1,955.25
|
|
|
|
Contract Labour - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Premier Artists
|
$33,000.00
|
|
|
|
Balance - Vanessa Amorosi Concert - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Smithson
|
$137.25
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$220.03
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000709
|
11/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access Boating And Leisure
|
$95.04
|
|
|
|
Lifejacket - Environmental Health
|
|
|
|
|
Actimed Australia
|
$3,916.00
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Adasound
|
$176.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Canterbury Tales 13-17/02/08 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving
|
$3,696.00
|
|
|
|
Install Concrete Pavers Corner Alexander Road & Fenchurch Street
Alexander Heights - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$636.25
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts – Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Angus & Robertson Pty Ltd
|
$53.02
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$443.99
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Customer Relations
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Recruitment
|
$6,379.23
|
|
|
|
Contract Staff - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Art Monthly Australia
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising Of Art Awards - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Protection Services
|
$3,311.74
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Three Times Theatre 14-16/02/08
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Summer 2 Concert 16/02/08
|
|
|
|
|
B & C Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd
|
$7,222.68
|
|
|
|
Installation Of Grease System - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN31597
|
|
|
|
|
BGC Cement
|
$318.38
|
|
|
|
Fast Setting Concrete - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Bill EXPRESS
|
$1,952.38
|
|
|
|
Bill Payment Fees - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd
|
$443.96
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Wanneroo Road Tapping
|
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment
|
$38,192.00
|
|
|
|
Silvan Custom Built Spray Unit - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$566.85
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Quinns Adult Day Care
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$1,139.60
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Legal Service Pty Ltd
|
$1,298.60
|
|
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
|
|
Champion Entertainment Agency
|
$1,045.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Summer Concert 3 01/03/08 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Chung Wah Welfare & Community Services
|
$850.00
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Couplers Malaga
|
$120.84
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Fittings - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Coventrys
|
$1,818.67
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
CSG Application Services
|
$770.00
|
|
|
|
Manuals For Crystal Reports Training
|
|
|
|
|
CVC Street Numbers
|
$474.10
|
|
|
|
Kerb Numbers - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
CY O'Connor of TAFE
|
$990.00
|
|
|
|
Ranger Training – Attendees D Cole, M White & G Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$412.50
|
|
|
|
Locking Services - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$12,539.52
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Concrete Footpath & Crossover - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete Hardstanding - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Boys Pizza Wanneroo
|
$66.85
|
|
|
|
Catering - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$1,925.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
E'Co Australia Ltd
|
$532.40
|
|
|
|
Bags Of Rags – Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Edith Cowan University
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Certificate In Museum Studies 07-08/07/2008 – P Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$4,463.57
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Events Industry Assoc
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Liquor Licensing Seminar – Attendees R Rayson, A McIntosh & S
Bruni - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$486.45
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For City
|
|
|
|
|
Fruit At Work
|
$655.50
|
|
|
|
Fruit - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel Distributors of WA Pty Ltd
|
$968.00
|
|
|
|
Bio Diesel - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$796.40
|
|
|
|
Equipment Lease - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Geoffs Tree Service
|
$5,505.50
|
|
|
|
Various Services - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$7,026.25
|
|
|
|
Building Services Consultancy For Jan08 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Gleeson Family Trust
|
$19,800.00
|
|
|
|
Fitness Challenge - 200 Participants
|
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia
|
$3,819.20
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal From Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu
|
$23,665.84
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Corolla Ascent Auto Sedan WN32630
($21798.69)
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$177.98
|
|
|
|
Replacement Tools - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Haines Norton Chartered Accountants
|
$7,260.00
|
|
|
|
Audit Services For City - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd
|
$281.47
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$532.93
|
|
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality Total Services
|
$1,178.10
|
|
|
|
Consultancy Fees - Cultural & Learning Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Humes
|
$5,142.50
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items For Berriman Drive Wangara
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable
|
$34,646.84
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Intercity Office Partitioning
|
$825.00
|
|
|
|
Cut Out Section Of Brick Wall At Hainsworth Community Hall - Building
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA
|
$22.00
|
|
|
|
General Meeting 15/02/08 – Attendee I Barker - Infrastructure Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$488.40
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kennedy's Tree Services
|
$2,970.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Cherry Picker - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Knights
|
$975.45
|
|
|
|
Fence Post Star Picket - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Aviary Netting - Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Animal Foodstuffs - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$175.37
|
|
|
|
Call Out Fee - Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Len French Fencing Contractor
|
$250.00
|
|
|
|
Tennis Court Repairs Gumblossom Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia
|
$1,229.00
|
|
|
|
Annual State Conference Mar08 – Attendee L Lam
|
|
|
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services Pty Ltd
|
$3,960.00
|
|
|
|
Verti Mow & Top Dressing - Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Lynford Motors
|
$30,527.25
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - PJ Ranger Crew Cab Chassis Xl 4X4 WN32629 -
Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd
|
$4,651.49
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$95.95
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$2,767.60
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For City
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Senior College
|
$1,200.00
|
|
|
|
Student Scholarships 2008 - R Hennessey, B Vaughan & J Leong -
Office Of The Mayor
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Glass
|
$1,269.52
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services At Hainsworth Leisure Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$488.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
MTU Detroit Diesel Australia
|
$4,785.99
|
|
|
|
Transynd Oil - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Multispares
|
$379.10
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Museums Australia (WA)
|
$44.00
|
|
|
|
Registration For Tour & Talk – Attendee P Rogers & R Rayson
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services
|
$3,949.00
|
|
|
|
Environmental Weed Control - Ottawa Wat Rehabilitation Site Works To
January 2008 (End Of First Year) - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Weed Control - Lake Joondalup Foreshore Wanneroo Rec
Centre 20/10/07-22/02/08 - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$462.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Control At Ashdale Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$522.50
|
|
|
|
Supply/Fit Windscreen To WN30785 - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Nuturf Australia Pty Ltd
|
$3,410.00
|
|
|
|
Wettasoil - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited
|
$507.65
|
|
|
|
Black Label Bond & Toner - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands
|
$16,587.33
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Peter McNabb and Associates Pty Ltd
|
$13,068.00
|
|
|
|
Payment #3-Professional Services: Wanneroo Centres Strategy Review
|
|
|
|
|
Pirtek Malaga Pty Ltd
|
$1,731.97
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
PlayRight Australia Pty Ltd
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Playground Safety Impact Testing - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$178.00
|
|
|
|
Printer Ink - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pocket Phone
|
$410.00
|
|
|
|
Nokia Advanced Car Kit – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
Alarm Call Out At Wanneroo Youth Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$2,247.91
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Put on Happy Face - Face Painting
|
$351.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Summer Concert 3 01/03/08 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Raeco International Pty Ltd
|
$122.55
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Reclaim Industries Ltd
|
$18,653.80
|
|
|
|
Vibraflex Softball Surfacing - Lake Joondalup Kindergarten
|
|
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi
|
$72.55
|
|
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Reece's Hire & Structures
|
$7,700.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment Summer Concert 2 – 3 - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services
|
$1,304.60
|
|
|
|
Linemarking & Signage Various Locations - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$69,965.28
|
|
|
|
Road Works At Clover Square Girrawheen
|
|
|
|
|
Road Works At Edgington & Shevlock Roads Koondoola
|
|
|
|
|
Rocla Quarry Products
|
$76.21
|
|
|
|
Bricklayers Sand - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Ronley Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$847.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Fences (MRF) - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
S & T Graphic Design and Colour Print
|
$1,155.00
|
|
|
|
A4 Advert Colour Printed Year 2008 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$256.25
|
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd
|
$2,971.76
|
|
|
|
Surveillance Audit - Day - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Solver Paints
|
$461.04
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Specialised Force Pty Ltd
|
$11.00
|
|
|
|
Delivery Charge - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces
|
$984.50
|
|
|
|
Repair Netball Court - Kingsway Netball Centre - Infrastructure
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sprayline
|
$859.36
|
|
|
|
Spraying Equipment - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors
|
$2,727.45
|
|
|
|
70Z Loader Hire - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Stom Investments Pty Ltd
|
$338.80
|
|
|
|
Ezycount Coin Counter - Customer Relations
|
|
|
|
|
Stomp Pty Ltd
|
$409.22
|
|
|
|
Bookstock & DVD's - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City Newsagency
|
$38.40
|
|
|
|
Newspapers - Two Rocks Library
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Brushware Supplies
|
$295.65
|
|
|
|
Segments Of Broom - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company
|
$244.86
|
|
|
|
Supply Road Advanced Warning Sign & Infrastructure Directional Sign
- Transport & Traffic
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades
|
$1,298.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Damaged Shade Sails At Carramar Community Centre - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
The Carers
|
$50.45
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
The Pursuits Group
|
$1,075.69
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Thiess Pty Ltd
|
$556.88
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Cherry Picker - 9 Days - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Tek Pty Ltd
|
$921.94
|
|
|
|
Flagging Tapes, Stakes & Road Paint - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd
|
$850.33
|
|
|
|
Courier Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
Total Eden Watering Systems
|
$157.03
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Total Road Services
|
$15,459.10
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
T-Quip
|
$2,705.15
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
WA Kerbing
|
$9,733.46
|
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies
|
$357.50
|
|
|
|
Stationery Items For Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
WALGA Breakfast – 22/02/08 – Attendee A McGregor - Governance
& Corporate Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery
|
$355.81
|
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance & Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One
|
$549.64
|
|
|
|
Compressor, Spotlight & Bow Shackle - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency
|
$775.25
|
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club Inc
|
$29,703.30
|
|
|
|
2007/8 Contribution To Management & Preparation Of The Turf Wickets
At Kingsway Sporting Complex - Second Half Yearly Instalment - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$5,331.64
|
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware
|
$342.19
|
|
|
|
Hardware Items For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$2,304.45
|
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Name Badge For Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$484.25
|
|
|
|
Immunisation Services - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
West Tip Waste Control Pty Ltd
|
$4,506.70
|
|
|
|
West Tip Bins For Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wheelchair Sports WA Association Inc
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Junior Wheelchair Basketball 16/01/08 - Leisure
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Wheelchair Basketball 30/01/08 - Leisure
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd
|
$331.10
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$1,786.00
|
|
|
|
Printing Non Compliance Card - Waste & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Printing Library Labels - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Printing-Business Cards For Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000710
|
11/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post
|
$2,195.11
|
|
|
|
Counter Billpay Transactions Feb08 - Rates
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$162.90
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$804.30
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments
|
$242,962.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Builders Registration Board
|
$16,443.00
|
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee - February 2008
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$48.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,347.68
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Glynis Monks
|
$75.05
|
|
|
|
1 X Varsity Chair - Councillor
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd
|
$22,014.22
|
|
|
|
Marangaroo Golf Course Commissions For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$2,568.15
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$1,758.49
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Annabel Craig
|
$297.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Visa Application Reimbursement - Smart Growth
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Dennis Blair
|
$274.60
|
|
|
|
50% Internet & Phone Rental - D Blair
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Ian Ireland
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
2007 Annual Reward + Recognition Winner
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Stephen Pole
|
$19.94
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Extender Cable For USB
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Fung Kuen Lucia Lam
|
$64.00
|
|
|
|
Reimburse 80% Broadband Usage 01/02-29/02/08
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Martine Baker
|
$55.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Flowers For Funeral
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Smithson
|
$137.25
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Sanala Super Fund 72499AG01
|
$2,653.27
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$12,730.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 07/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Telstra Business Systems Pty Ltd
|
$3,440.45
|
|
|
|
English Text Keys - IP Phones – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000711
|
11/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mayor J Kelly
|
$5,966.67
|
|
|
|
Mayoral Monthly Allowance & Rates For P/N150893 ($200.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000712
|
18/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Australia
|
$1,159.52
|
|
|
|
Paging Services - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments
|
$1,127.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: Non Cycle Pay
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$25,612.54
|
|
|
|
Commission Fees Carramar Golf Course Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
EmPlus Superannuation Fund
|
$154.03
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super
|
$358.45
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
Navigator Applications Account
|
$102.92
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Del Borrello
|
$3,638.25
|
|
|
|
Contract Labour - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Safety House Association of Western Australia
|
$545.00
|
|
|
|
Advert To Appear In Safety House Program -
Office Of The Mayor
|
|
|
|
|
Sanala Super Fund 72499AG01
|
$2,653.27
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction;F/E 08/02/08
|
|
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund
|
$177.56
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
Surfing Western Australia Surf School
|
$640.00
|
|
|
|
Surfing Program - Gold Program
|
|
|
|
|
The Bernadette Superannuation Fund
|
$61.75
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
TPS Retirement Fund
|
$110.47
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$222.32
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Company Superannuation Service Limited
|
$66.16
|
|
|
|
Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation
|
$374,480.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll: Employee Super Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000713
|
18/03/2008
|
Anh Truong
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Alan Blencowe
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Glynis Monks
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Ian Goodenough
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Laura Gray
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Paul Miles
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Rudi Steffens
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Tracey Roberts
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Councillors Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Maureen Grierson
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$137.25
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance (Paid Weekly)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000714
|
18/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
3D Networks (Australia) Pty Ltd
|
$2,059.64
|
|
|
|
Voip Phones – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Aarons Florist
|
$140.50
|
|
|
|
Flowers - 50Th Wedding Anniversary F & R
Stewart - Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers - Get Well Soon - Marketing Services
|
|
|
|
|
Able Cirdon Enterprises
|
$4,800.00
|
|
|
|
Fire Breaks - Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$685.34
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Governance & Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Roof Restoration
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
|
Install Colorbond Gutters & Downpipes
Unit 9 & 11 Leach Road Wanneroo - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving
|
$10,596.85
|
|
|
|
Install Paving To Bellhaven Park & Jenolan Day
Centre
|
|
|
|
|
AHG Paper & Magazine Delivery
|
$16.40
|
|
|
|
Newspapers - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd
|
$349.23
|
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Albox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$686.92
|
|
|
|
Conservation Materials - Leisure & Cultural
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Alison Cunningham
|
$420.00
|
|
|
|
Term 1 Art Classes - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Altus Traffic
|
$326.57
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Hester Avenue - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$4,857.08
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Aria Entertainment-Jay Weston
|
$715.00
|
|
|
|
Performance For 20/02/08 - Annual Reward
& Recognition Function
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Pressure Wash
|
$93.50
|
|
|
|
Service Pressure Cleaner - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Recruitment
|
$7,320.72
|
|
|
|
Labour Hire - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd
|
$1,296.63
|
|
|
|
Road Materials Delivered To High Road - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Audiocom Joondalup
|
$3,677.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Aussie It
|
$2,269.96
|
|
|
|
Server Ram & HDD – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd
|
$2,721.13
|
|
|
|
Airconditioning Services At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Government National Measurement Institute
|
$759.33
|
|
|
|
Wangara Sump Water Testing - Conservation
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$3,344.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Managing Team Budgets &
Financials 19/02/08 - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers
|
$214.78
|
|
|
|
Plants For Citizenship Ceremony
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Turf Industries
|
$54,795.62
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Works For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
AUZspec
|
$226.00
|
|
|
|
Ergonomics Computer Equipment - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Badge Construction Pty Ltd
|
$277,580.45
|
|
|
|
Payment Progress 8 - Butler Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres
|
$22,079.55
|
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Bentley Systems Software
|
$9,768.00
|
|
|
|
Mxsubdiv & Mxroad Subscription – IT
Services
|
|
|
|
|
BGC Cement
|
$318.38
|
|
|
|
Concrete Delivery - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
BGC Concrete
|
$244.86
|
|
|
|
Concrete - Chattanooga Vista - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd
|
$2,854.02
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Bounce Away
|
$515.90
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Bouncer For Various Community Events
|
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment
|
$644.62
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$5,530.05
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Oil & Grease Guns - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers
|
$402.08
|
|
|
|
Courier Services - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
BT Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$23.06
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Bullivants Pty Ltd
|
$1,204.76
|
|
|
|
Inspection - Lifting Equipment - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$1,140.64
|
|
|
|
Hardware Items For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Burgtec Australasia Pty Ltd
|
$1,630.20
|
|
|
|
Office Chair For Director Projects - Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Bynorm
|
$935.81
|
|
|
|
Mower Spare Parts – Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
CA Technology Pty Ltd
|
$209.00
|
|
|
|
Changes For Budgets Out Of Interplan – IT
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Cameleon Paints
|
$1,699.94
|
|
|
|
Paint - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$6,940.03
|
|
|
|
Various Sands - Depot Stores, Parks & Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Caval Ltd
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
The Hyperlinked Library: Trends, Tools &
Transparency Seminar 05/03/08 - Attendee V Lee
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Legal Service Pty Ltd
|
$3,795.00
|
|
|
|
Professional Services : HR Industrial
Magistrates Court Claim
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: HR AMWU - Protected
Ballot In The AIRC
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: HR Unfair Dismissal Claim
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: HR Magistrates Claim
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: HR Investigation
Complaint Against Employee
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: EOC Claim
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA
|
$646.80
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Depot Stores Stock &
Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Champion Compressed Air & Cooling Solutions
|
$391.56
|
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Chef Excel Pty Ltd
|
$673.05
|
|
|
|
Catering - Council Buffet 26/02/08
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Essentials Pty Ltd
|
$1,061.50
|
|
|
|
Vet Disinfectant - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Chicken Treat
|
$84.50
|
|
|
|
Catering For Yandella Prom Fire - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
City Business Machines
|
$2,471.00
|
|
|
|
Mobile Phones/Handsets – IT Services And Building
& Health
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$8,621.59
|
|
|
|
Various Equipment Hire - Engineering &
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilet Hire - Summer Concert 3 -
Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Computelec Pty Ltd
|
$180.40
|
|
|
|
Publisher 2007 English Software – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Comsync Consulting
|
$1,251.25
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services – IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation Volunteers Australia
|
$3,025.00
|
|
|
|
Project Contribution - Leisure Implement
Master Trails Plans
|
|
|
|
|
Coventrys
|
$1,413.13
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
CVC Street Numbers
|
$820.05
|
|
|
|
Street Numbers - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
DA Information Services Pty Ltd
|
$194.93
|
|
|
|
Library Magazine Subscriptions - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Dalcon Construction Pty Ltd
|
$100,625.58
|
|
|
|
Progress Payment 2 - Gumblossom Reserve
Change rooms
|
|
|
|
|
Datanet Pty Ltd
|
$3,586.00
|
|
|
|
Barcode Scanner - Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Denmoss Holdings
|
$6,490.00
|
|
|
|
Stage For Summer Concert 3 Liddel Park
-Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Dept for Planning & Infrastructure
|
$181.00
|
|
|
|
Land Exchange - Aquamotion Document &
Registration Fee
|
|
|
|
|
Dialog
|
$15,790.50
|
|
|
|
Business Review - SOE Consultancy Project -
Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$36.30
|
|
|
|
Keys - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
DME Contractors
|
$58,931.40
|
|
|
|
Progress Payment 2 - Kingsbridge Park Wheeled
Sports Facility
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$8,973.36
|
|
|
|
Supply/Concrete Footpath Broadview Park - Infrastructure
Planning
|
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher
|
$207.35
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Electek
|
$1,250.05
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 7 - Gumblossom Res Oval Lighting
|
|
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms
|
$81.51
|
|
|
|
Various Plants - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$13,330.66
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd
|
$608.30
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M)
|
$81,409.63
|
|
|
|
Landscape Works - Butler For Jan/Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise
|
$3,867.60
|
|
|
|
Location Of Services At Ocean Drive Quinns
Rocks - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Forcorp Pty Ltd
|
$2,656.50
|
|
|
|
Strobe Lights - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$948.30
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Friction Control
|
$610.50
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Fruit At Work
|
$228.00
|
|
|
|
Fruit Purchase For Staff - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$5,362.11
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment Lease/Rental - Reprographics
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff Ninnes Fong & Partners Pty Ltd
|
$5,500.00
|
|
|
|
Upgrade Of Aquamotion Centre - Strategic Projects
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$65,204.77
|
|
|
|
Advice & Review 50Kw Solar Study
|
|
|
|
|
Kingsway Sporting Complex Stage 2 Construction Phase -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Hartman Dr Dual C/Way Design & Documentation -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Gladstone MRM (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Data Work To Redesign Database Configuration
- Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Globetrotter Corporate Travel
|
$117.81
|
|
|
|
Summer Concert Charges - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
GPR Truck Sales & Service
|
$1,337.75
|
|
|
|
Wheel Alignment For Various Vehicles - Fleet
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia
|
$4,855.40
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu
|
$46,930.28
|
|
|
|
Services For Various Vehicles - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
2 x New Vehicle Purchase Toyota Corolla
($22,121.19 Ea)
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$1,112.65
|
|
|
|
Various Equipment - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Various Equipment - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd
|
$2,323.97
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Hart Sport
|
$167.10
|
|
|
|
Netball Bibs For Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd
|
$750.44
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Humes
|
$10,870.41
|
|
|
|
Concrete Delivery For Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrosteer Pty Ltd
|
$1,645.09
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Fittings Sales (WA) Pty
|
$57.87
|
|
|
|
Retic Fitting - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Innova Group Pty Ltd
|
$10,833.08
|
|
|
|
Trestle Tables - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable
|
$85,946.79
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Jane B Blake
|
$217.80
|
|
|
|
Oral History Transcription - Heritage Services
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Sign Makers
|
$148.50
|
|
|
|
Signage - Reflective Sign For Fire Depot
|
|
|
|
|
John Stevens Carpentry
|
$1,639.00
|
|
|
|
Rectify Vandalised Steps & Walls Nankees
Park - Tapping
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$418.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees - Building & Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Photo Design
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Photography - Awards Function 20/02/08 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Kleenit
|
$990.00
|
|
|
|
Clean Gazebo At Santa Clark Park
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$401.20
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables
|
$79.71
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire
|
$157.30
|
|
|
|
Rental Of Indoor Plantss For Feb08 - Customer
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark Engineering & Design
|
$7,211.60
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Bin Surrounds With Concrete
Pad At Broadview Park - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
LGnet
|
$104.50
|
|
|
|
On-Line Advertising - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Liftrite Hire & Sales
|
$381.88
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Community Development Assoc Of WA
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Conference - Developing Communities In
Changing Times 10-11 April 2008 – Attendee M Quirk
|
|
|
|
|
Lynford Motors
|
$92,991.63
|
|
|
|
2 x New Vehicle Purchase - Falcon Wagon –
($30,995.70 ea)
|
|
|
|
|
1 x New Vehicle Purchase - Falcon Wagon ($31,000.90)
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd
|
$8,847.44
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$134.01
|
|
|
|
Filter Transmission - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Jeavons Landscape Architects
|
$3,140.50
|
|
|
|
Professional Fees - Yellagonga Regional Park
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$51,685.98
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For City
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors
|
$582.45
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Services
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Contracts & Property
|
|
|
|
|
Merriwa Chinese Restaurant
|
$44.90
|
|
|
|
Catering - Wattle Ave Fire - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Metrocount
|
$116.00
|
|
|
|
Road Cleats - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mey Equipment
|
$88.40
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Geary Signs
|
$649.00
|
|
|
|
Sign ‘No Dogs’ - Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Bus Charter Pty Ltd
|
$242.00
|
|
|
|
Bus Hire For Smart Growth Yellagonga National
Park Tour
|
|
|
|
|
Mining & Hydraulic Supplies
|
$55.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd
|
$529.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$1,339.55
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Move It
|
$253.00
|
|
|
|
Furniture Relocations In COW Offices
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Rollershutter
|
$126.50
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rocks Child Health Centre - Service Call
|
|
|
|
|
Nationwide Oil Pty Ltd
|
$701.25
|
|
|
|
Collection Of Waste Oil - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors
|
$41,034.70
|
|
|
|
Landscaping - Hocking/Tapping/Yanchep/Two
Rocks For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Remove & Prune Trees At Hornpipe Vista -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Agonis At Graham St/Brush Cut At San
Teo Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
NewsXpress Ocean Keys
|
$35.20
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Corridor Contracting
|
$8,400.00
|
|
|
|
Install Firebreaks - Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$880.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Control Services At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
Supply/Fit Windscreen WN32429 - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory & Reporting Fee -
Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
Oasis Supa Golf
|
$1,442.96
|
|
|
|
Golf For Gold Program Outing - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Lunch X 68 - Gold Program - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited
|
$634.99
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Maintenance Dual Roll Printer -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Optima Press
|
$5,563.80
|
|
|
|
Printing - Outdoor Cinema Brochures
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Glow Show Flyers - Cultural Development
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Council Meetings - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Green Refuse Flyers - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Printing - Family Day Care Brochures -
Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands
|
$1,040.39
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Parins
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN31920 - Insurance Services
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Motors of Wanneroo
|
$37,254.09
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Purchase Holden Captiva WN32623
|
|
|
|
|
Pirtek Malaga Pty Ltd
|
$1,538.65
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$620.40
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Information Services
|
|
|
|
|
PPG Industries Australia Pty Ltd
|
$182.52
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies - Safety Services
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$610.50
|
|
|
|
Alarm Services At Gumblossom - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$5,096.65
|
|
|
|
Safety Items For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
PS Structures P/L
|
$605,000.00
|
|
|
|
Progress Payment #4 New Cultural & Learning Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
Testing Of Limestone - Ocean Drive - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Multimedia Communications
|
$135.17
|
|
|
|
SMS Account - Volunteer Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Raeco International Pty Ltd
|
$4,679.02
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd
|
$524.03
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management
|
$745.87
|
|
|
|
Document Retrieval Services - Records Services
|
|
|
|
|
Reclaim Industries Ltd
|
$2,420.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Softfall At Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi
|
$147.30
|
|
|
|
Courier Services - Waste & Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Redman Solutions Pty Ltd
|
$1,115.60
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Renewal - Trapeze - Information
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services
|
$70,776.20
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For City
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$21,466.28
|
|
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Robertson Lifting & Rigging Pty Ltd
|
$1,572.80
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Life Saving Society Australia
|
$4,831.10
|
|
|
|
Swimming Pool Inspections For P/E 28/02/08 -
Building & Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pool Lifeguard Requalification For D Wright -
Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
RSS Signs & Safety
|
$745.80
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Guard For Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
RTV Computers Pty Ltd
|
$676.50
|
|
|
|
Computer Equipment - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$396.00
|
|
|
|
Safety Gloves - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Sanax St Andrews Pharmacy
|
$634.70
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Schiavello Wa Pty Ltd
|
$1,404.70
|
|
|
|
Various Items Of Office Furniture -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Scotts Trimming Service
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Restitch Cushion Mower Seat - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sico South Pacific Ltd
|
$5,577.00
|
|
|
|
Tables - Mobile Folding - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio
|
$3,928.38
|
|
|
|
Construction Of Gumblossom Reserve Changerooms
|
|
|
|
|
Sport Knowledge Australia
|
$6,425.00
|
|
|
|
International Sport Facility Management Programme
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd
|
$417.84
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Quinns Adult Day Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Sprayline
|
$859.36
|
|
|
|
Spray Pack - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors
|
$6,198.50
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For City
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$3,487.99
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services
|
$505.00
|
|
|
|
Depot Oil Recovery & Inspection Of
Yanchep Beach Kiosk - Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service
|
$342.01
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen - Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Stomp Pty Ltd
|
$239.51
|
|
|
|
Book stock - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Stopmaster Brakes
|
$915.20
|
|
|
|
Front/Rear Brake Relining - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City News
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising - Marketing Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Brushware Supplies
|
$1,968.75
|
|
|
|
Broom Segments - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Brushware Supplies - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company
|
$3,069.00
|
|
|
|
Various Signs & Accessories -
Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Surf Life Saving WA Inc
|
$18,384.69
|
|
|
|
Surf Lifesaving Contract Feb 2008 - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Swan Tafe
|
$460.10
|
|
|
|
Certificate III In Automotive Mechanical -
Semester 1 Enrolment Fees For NJ MacLeod & SM Taylor
|
|
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd
|
$181.72
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Technology One Ltd
|
$1,595.00
|
|
|
|
ABS Consulting Report - D Maskew -
Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
The Carers
|
$57.75
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
The Electric Stoveman
|
$221.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Broken Oven Parts - Gumblossom
Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara
|
$1,320.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase 1 Plate Compactor - Infrastructure
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd
|
$264.77
|
|
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Total Eden Watering Systems
|
$653.35
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Total Road Services
|
$9,048.09
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Signs - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services At Various Locations
- Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
T-Quip
|
$4,733.35
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrolit Australia Pty Ltd
|
$605.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Concrete Saw - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Vending Coffee Machines
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
Service To Vending Machine - Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
WA Kerbing
|
$34,358.89
|
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Templeton Street &
Girrawheen
|
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies
|
$27.72
|
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
WA Profiling
|
$5,394.40
|
|
|
|
Profiling Works At Dundebar Road
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators
|
$3,593.92
|
|
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency
|
$66.45
|
|
|
|
Newspapers - Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$9,811.99
|
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware
|
$2,096.12
|
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$4,831.32
|
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$99.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$52.00
|
|
|
|
Name Badges For Various Staff Members
|
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Update For Name Plaque (Cr Grierson)
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Radiators
|
$3,080.00
|
|
|
|
New Radiator - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Westbooks
|
$11.04
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Woodhead International
|
$4,400.00
|
|
|
|
Contract Variation - Butler Community Centre
- Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal
|
$2,217.60
|
|
|
|
Professional Fee - Contracts & Property
|
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber
|
$139.50
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - S Winters - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Alliance
|
$3,354.12
|
|
|
|
Provision Of Labour Hire - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$238.50
|
|
|
|
Laminating Poster - Leisure Services
|
|
|
|
|
Printing Business Cards For Various Staff Members
|
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil
|
$914.75
|
|
|
|
Waste Disposal - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
WT Partnership Australia Pty Ltd
|
$3,300.00
|
|
|
|
Surveying Services - Aquamotion - Strategic Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Yakka Pty Ltd
|
$447.92
|
|
|
|
Uniform Issues For Various Staff Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000715
|
25/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aarons Florist
|
$91.00
|
|
|
|
Flowers - Sympathy - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$268.83
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Leisure & Youth Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$352.49
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Analytico Pty Ltd
|
$715.00
|
|
|
|
Renewal - Maintenance & Support Of The
Auto Track Swept Path Prediction Software19/04/08-18/04/09 - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd
|
$10,485.12
|
|
|
|
Airconditioning Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$615.00
|
|
|
|
Training - Excel Advanced 17 & 18/03/08 – Attendee R Duggan
|
|
|
|
|
Baileys Fertilisers
|
$863.50
|
|
|
|
Brilliance Fertiliser - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$437.80
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd
|
$400.93
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To 6 Nanovich Avenue
Girrawheen
|
|
|
|
|
Bosnar Engineering Pty Ltd
|
$1,567.50
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$211,010.34
|
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Brownbuilt Metalux Industries
|
$1,088.71
|
|
|
|
Office Cupboard - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Bureau Veritas
|
$55.00
|
|
|
|
Asbestos Labels - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$80.41
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Car Care (WA) Mindarie
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Fire Truck WN32526 - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$2,709.22
|
|
|
|
Sand Deliveries For Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Clean Sweep
|
$1,164.63
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services - Infrastructure
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$485.10
|
|
|
|
2 x Two Stroke Hedge Trimmer - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Coventrys
|
$90.18
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Department Of Water
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Licence Fee To Redrill At St Andrews & Vosnacos
Park
|
|
|
|
|
Different By Design
|
$520.00
|
|
|
|
Graphic Design Services 10 & 14/03/08 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Direct National Business Machines
|
$704.00
|
|
|
|
Service Guillotine/Purchase Blade - Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics
|
$3,222.70
|
|
|
|
Electrical Repairs - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$2,431.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Various Waste - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$1,059.59
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services Pty Ltd
|
$1,123.10
|
|
|
|
Fire Equipment Testing For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Call Out - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Express Towing Services
|
$539.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA
|
$693.00
|
|
|
|
Equipment - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fone Biz
|
$1,050.00
|
|
|
|
7 x Pager Repairs - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Friction Control
|
$64.68
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$1,164.90
|
|
|
|
Equipment Lease For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$7,026.25
|
|
|
|
Building Services Consultancy Feb 08 -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia
|
$7,233.60
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal Services - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu
|
$55,216.52
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Camry Altise
Auto Sedan WN32633 ($26864.51) - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Toyota Camry Altise
Auto Sedan WN32635 ($26863.86) - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty
|
$1,634.82
|
|
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$646.64
|
|
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare Options
|
$8,343.83
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Humes
|
$4,822.04
|
|
|
|
Concrete Delivered To Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Hyster West
|
$1,002.57
|
|
|
|
Forklift Hire 01-29/02/08 - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Icon Office Technology
|
$428.57
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services
|
$2,790.81
|
|
|
|
Call Centre Services For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable
|
$35,239.36
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Sign Makers
|
$588.50
|
|
|
|
Signage - Replace Striping To 96028 Quinns
Rocks 3.4 Driver Cab & Door - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Signage - Replace Striping To 95065 - Fleet
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
John Stevens Carpentry
|
$1,815.00
|
|
|
|
Repair Capping To Pump House Walls, Tapping
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$154.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust Pty Ltd
|
$44.24
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Infrastructure
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables
|
$117.10
|
|
|
|
Power Board - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Pliers & Bolt Cutters - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia
|
$824.00
|
|
|
|
LGMA March 2008 Annual State Conference
12-14/03/08 – Attendee N Barker
|
|
|
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services Pty Ltd
|
$2,145.00
|
|
|
|
Decompaction - Wanneroo Showgrounds
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd
|
$9,758.21
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts – Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$1,882.10
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For City
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors
|
$778.25
|
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Correspondence - Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Geary Signs
|
$1,104.40
|
|
|
|
Sign - Dewers Surf Break Track - Rangers Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Dog Exercise Area - Engine Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$374.00
|
|
|
|
Playground Equipment - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$143.85
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
National Hire Trading Pty Limited
|
$334.13
|
|
|
|
Hire Of 20Kva Generator - Quinns Rocks
Caravan Park
|
|
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors
|
$633.60
|
|
|
|
Landscaping - Anchorage Drive Mindarie For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
North Lake Electrical Pty Ltd
|
$14,151.50
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Irrigation Pump Control Cubicle - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Not-For-Profit-Network
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Subscription - Not For Profit Management
Magazine - Community Services
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$1,002.89
|
|
|
|
Supply/Fit Glass To Various Plant - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
O'Leary's
|
$14.74
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Optima Press
|
$123.20
|
|
|
|
Printing - Blank Stock Paper Cyclus Bond -
Smart Growth
|
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting
|
$19,571.51
|
|
|
|
Sandpit Cleaning & Playground Inspections For Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
Alterations To Gazebo Timber Panels - Banksia
Grove Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$285.80
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Information Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Prentice Industries
|
$5,016.00
|
|
|
|
Access Ramp - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
NDM Testing - Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks
|
|
|
|
|
Raeco International Pty Ltd
|
$5,208.77
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services
|
$4,808.10
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For Feb08 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$158.40
|
|
|
|
Safety Glasses - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Schiavello Wa Pty Ltd
|
$1,757.80
|
|
|
|
Office Furniture/Workstation Items -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Office Furniture - Tray/Shelves - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd
|
$1,880.06
|
|
|
|
Lift Service - Alexander Heights Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Lift Service - Wanneroo Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Lift Service - Wanneroo Civic Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors
|
$5,996.10
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For City
|
|
|
|
|
Talkin' Dirty
|
$1,207.58
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Cleaning - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Irrigation Imports
|
$892.87
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Controllers At Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
The Electric Stoveman
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Service Oven At Hainsworth Leisure Centre
|
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara
|
$176.00
|
|
|
|
Side Tilt Cement Mixers - Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
The Pursuits Group
|
$1,044.45
|
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACAP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$13,339.43
|
|
|
|
Grass Sweeping At Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Supply/Spread Fertiliser At San Theodora Park
|
|
|
|
|
Uniforms @ Work
|
$283.80
|
|
|
|
Uniforms For Councillor
|
|
|
|
|
Vizcom Technologies
|
$109,769.00
|
|
|
|
Upgrade To Council Chambers - New AV,
Projector, Crestron Control System, New TOA Wireless System & FTR Digital
Recording System - It
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery
|
$579.23
|
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$720.02
|
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware
|
$791.24
|
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$3,803.75
|
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$858.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Name Badges For Various Staff Members
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$3,631.97
|
|
|
|
Immunisation Program - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Suspensions
|
$1,755.60
|
|
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Westbooks
|
$257.63
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber
|
$111.60
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms For K Barlow - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Worlds Best Products Pty Ltd
|
$2,992.00
|
|
|
|
Purchase Graffiti Remover - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$198.00
|
|
|
|
Business Cards - Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil
|
$1,038.50
|
|
|
|
Waste Oil Disposal - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Zipform
|
$710.60
|
|
|
|
A4 Rate Notices - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000716
|
26/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$162.90
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$804.30
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments
|
$254,260.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$48.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,347.68
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$418.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
FESA
|
$22,821.66
|
|
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For Mike Teraci's Salary For
Aug07, Dec07, Jan08 & Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$2,568.15
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,018.85
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Christopher Hunt
|
$64.31
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Fuel For Plant 95126
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Lynnette Nabholz
|
$129.88
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Digital Camera - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Smithson
|
$137.25
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance (Paid Weekly)
|
|
|
|
|
Sanala Super Fund 72499AG01
|
$2,653.27
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$12,730.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 21/03/08
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$15.59
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
UDIA(WA)
|
$625.00
|
|
|
|
Training - The Network City Forum 'Getting
Density' 11/03/08 – Attendees M Dickson, P Thompson, A Craig, M Allen
& I Barker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00000717
|
26/03/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor Brett Treby
|
$1,833.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's
|
$4,826,853.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED
CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD
|
|
00068269
|
12/02/2008
|
Leigh Green
|
-$565.00
|
|
00067688
|
17/12/2007
|
Time Out Together - Seniors
|
-$340.00
|
|
00067923
|
15/01/2008
|
Ikea
|
-$558.00
|
|
00068268
|
12/02/2008
|
Niaz Servari
|
-$340.00
|
|
00067875
|
15/01/2008
|
LB Berger
|
-$328.69
|
|
00068257
|
10/03/2008
|
Kate Pollock
|
-$1,060.00
|
|
00068515
|
26/02/2008
|
Commissioner of State Revenue
|
-$181.00
|
|
00068447
|
26/02/2008
|
Renegades
|
-$565.00
|
|
00068379
|
19/02/2008
|
Dancing Fillies
|
-$565.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
-$4,502.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANUAL
JOURNALS
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees – March 2008
|
$2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN
PLANNING SCHEME
|
|
|
31/03/2008
|
Cell 1
|
$39,151.01
|
|
|
|
Peet & Co Ltd - Pinjar Road Civil
Works/Professional Fees/Realignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$39,151.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Municipal Recoup
|
$
7,281,283.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account
|
|
|
|
Payroll Payments March 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Wages
|
$876,818.08
|
|
|
|
Payment of Wages
|
$3,379.54
|
|
|
|
Payment of Wages
|
$910,626.93
|
|
|
|
Payment of Wages
|
$11,345.08
|
|
|
|
Payment of Wages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total
|
$1,802,169.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees March 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fees
|
$283.36
|
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee Waste
Services Eftpos
|
$59.00
|
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee
|
$41.88
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee
|
$151.71
|
|
|
|
LINE Fee
|
$208.30
|
|
|
|
Trans Negotiation
Auth Limit Fee
|
$58.33
|
|
|
|
Account Service
Fee
|
$487.75
|
|
|
|
COMMBIZ Fee
|
$481.04
|
|
|
|
BPAY Fee
|
$1,950.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Bank Fees
|
$3,721.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments:
|
|
|
|
|
F Bentley - Planning
Institute Conference Attendance
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Credit Card Payments
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup March 2008
|
$7,281,283.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total
(Includes Advance Recoup,
Credit Cards And Bank
Fees)
|
$7,285,082.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund
|
$9,087,252.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S13/0002V11
File Name: BB Financial Activity Statement for
Period Ending 31 March 2008.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Senior Budget Officer
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the 2007/08 Financial Activity Statements for
the period ended 31 March 2008.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government
(Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to
prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according to
nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration has opted to
present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and in a similar
format to that presented in the Rate Setting Statement for the 2007/2008 Annual
Budget. This format separates operating revenue and expenditure from other
revenue and expenditure and provides improved disclosure of Council’s
underlying operating result.
The Financial Activity Statement is in the form of an
Income Statement and Balance Sheet. The Income Statement compares year to date
actual income and expenditure with the year to date budget, shows variances,
the adopted budget and the revised budget (if any). The Balance Sheet shows
the current status of the City’s assets and liabilities.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(1) of the Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government
to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian
Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for
reporting material variances. At its meeting of 31 October 2006, Council
adopted 10% for the reporting of variances for financial activities.
Detail
The attached Statement of Financial Activity for the period
ended 31 March 2008 represents the nine (9) months results of the financial
year.
As an ongoing process, each Service Unit is required to
review and monitor its actual and budget financials monthly, and as such
Administration has updated year end forecasts accordingly, which is reflected
as Revised Budget.
Comments on the financial performance are set out below.
Consultation
Nil
Comments
The following comments are provided on the Income Statement
and Balance Sheet for the period ended 31 March 2008: -
Income Statement (Attachment 1 refers)
Operating Result (Operating Revenue – Operating
Expenses)
YTD Actual
$ 8.525 million
YTD Budget -$ 4.546
million
YTD Variance $13.071
million (+288%)
Full Year Adopted Budget -$26.295 million
Full Year Revised Budget -$21.794 million
The following information is provided on key aspects of the
year to date operating result: -
Operating Revenue
YTD Actual
$81.286 million
YTD Budget $81.838
million
YTD Variance -$ 0.552
million (-1%)
Full Year Adopted Budget $89.843 million
Full Year Revised Budget $91.978 million
The year to date operating actual revenue was equivalent to
88% of the full year revised budget, which predominantly captured all rates and
rubbish collection fee income for the current financial year that was 100%
booked as accrued income in the month of August.
The largest component of the operating revenue is Rates,
equalling $47.673 million year to date, which forms 59% of the total revenue
year to date and 52% of the total revised budget revenues. This year, the City
has received more than 75% of rates payments in the first nine months,
which provides more than expected funds for investments. On the other hand, full
year rates budget has been slightly revised down by $0.213 million to more
accurately reflect the expected reduction in penalty charges due to late
payments.
Grants and Subsidies – operating exceeded budget by $0.552
million (11%). Full year budget has been revised to $7.122 million, an
increase of $0.676 million to reflect the higher than expected General Purpose
Grant funding.
With the Contributions, Reimbursements and Donations the
City has received this year, we are ahead of budget by $0.222 million (20%).
The main reason for this is due to a greater receipt of cash contributions in
relation to parks. Expecting other budgeted amounts to be receipted in full by
year-end, Administration has further revised the full year budget up by $0.090
million.
Of the Fees and Charges the more material amounts accounted
for year to date worth noting are $11.397 million for Rubbish Collection Fees,
$1.591 million for Green Fees income, $2.661 million for Application,
Licence & Permit Fee income (mainly in Building Assessments and Development
Assessments) and $2.484 million for Service Fee Income. Overall, year to date
receipt of income in this category is slightly below budget by 7%.
However, Administration anticipates the original budgeted
amounts to be achievable, based on the current projection of usages and demands
by the community. Accordingly, the revised budget amounts remain relatively the
same as the adopted budget.
It is worth noting that the City has been continuing to
perform extremely well in its investment activities in the current environment.
During the year, the international financial market had been substantially
adversely affected by the sub prime mortgage crises initiated from U.S.A.
However, the City’s Administration had been able to foresee the risks and had
been placing all new funds received during the year to term deposits, which
attracted high interest rates with no capital risks. Thus, Administration
anticipates meeting its revised figures that were increased up by
$2.303 million to $7.640 million to reflect the current interest rate
increase cycles.
Operating Expenses
YTD Actual
-$ 72.761 million
YTD Budget -$
86.384 million
YTD Variance $
13.623 million (16%)
Full Year Adopted Budget -$116.139 million
Full Year Revised Budget -$113.772
million
Employee costs, which represented about 36% of the year to
date expenses in actual, were below budget by $1.306 million (5%) and will
continue to come into line with budget expectations. The vacant positions
throughout the city have provided potential savings year to date however with a
new EBA to be agreed to, this favourable variance is likely to be offset by
year-end. After accounting for various known and projected factors, it is
believed that year-end figures for salary expenses will come close to the
adopted budget.
Overall, the year to date operating expenses are below
budget by $13.623 million (+16%), mainly due to the timing differences between
the actual materials and contracts works and the budget spreads which were
loaded on a pro-rata basis. For the purposes of annual budget review, each
Service Unit had scrutinized their materials and contracts expenses and an
overall reduction of full year expenses, approximately $2.115 million, was
anticipated and still stands.
Utilities are continuing to run under budget to the value
of $0.486 million (19%) at present, which is primarily due to less than
expected expenditures on street lighting. To properly reflect this impact, the
full year budget for utilities has been revised down by $0.209 million.
Interest Expenses are expected to come close to the adopted
budget for the full year. The main component within this category is interest
repayments to Western Australia Treasury Corporation on our loan drawn down.
Insurance costs are currently slightly over year to date
budget estimates and are expected to increase by $0.083 million for the
full year mainly due to the increase in General Insurance Premium.
Other Revenue and Expenses (excluding contributions of
physical assets)
YTD Actual $24.482
million
YTD Budget $23.438
million
YTD Variance $ 1.044
million (+4%)
Full Year Adopted Budget $35.173 million
Full Year Revised Budget $40.461 million
The overall year-to-date impact of the Other Revenue and
Expenses is positive to the amount of $1.044 million (4%). Contributions,
Reimbursements and Donations – non operating have a year to date positive
variance of 57%, primarily resulting from Town Planning Scheme contributions
being above our budget estimates.
Full year budget has been revised up by $5.288 million,
mainly due to the expected increase in the full year Town Planning Scheme
contribution, which is offset by the deferral of income ($4.2 million)
from sale of subdivision land in Motivation Drive, Wangara.
With regard to physical assets contributed by developers,
to date the City has not had confirmation of the values to be recognised in the
accounts for this financial year.
Balance Sheet (Attachment 2 refers)
As at 31 March the current status of the capital budget is
as stated below: -
|
|
Current
EOY Budget
|
YTD
Actual
|
Commitments
|
Total
(YTD Actual +
Commitments)
|
|
Community
|
$15.972 m
|
$ 5.362 m
|
$12.999 m
|
$18.361 m
|
|
Conservation
|
$ 1.271 m
|
$ 0.181 m
|
$ 0.086 m
|
$ 0.267 m
|
|
Corporate
|
$ 6.507 m
|
$ 3.161 m
|
$ 0.804 m
|
$ 3.965 m
|
|
Drainage
|
$ 0.471 m
|
$ 0.120 m
|
$ 0.000 m
|
$ 0.120 m
|
|
Investment
|
$13.275 m
|
$ 0.337 m
|
$ 0.002 m
|
$ 0.339 m
|
|
Recreation & Sport
|
$23.798 m
|
$ 6.914 m
|
$14.314 m
|
$21.228 m
|
|
Transport
|
$24.690 m
|
$ 6.689 m
|
$ 1.424 m
|
$ 8.113 m
|
|
Waste Management
|
$11.259 m
|
$ 3.215 m
|
$ 4.893 m
|
$ 8.108 m
|
|
Total Capital Works
|
$97.243 m
|
$25.979 m
|
$34.522 m
|
$60.501 m
|
(m = million)
It should be noted that the YTD
actual expenditure relates to the cash position and does not include
commitments. Part of the commitments indicated above relate to works to be
carried out in 2008/2009.
Historically most projects of a capital nature undertaken
by the City are completed towards the end of the financial year and as such
considerable progress is expected over the coming three (3) months. The status
of a number of major projects not reflected in the above table are listed
below:-
|
Neerabup Industrial Area
|
$9.0 m
|
Project substantially delayed
due to environmental constraints impacting on the joint venture. Funds will
be carried forward.
|
|
Hartman Drive Dual
Carriageway
|
$3.0 m
|
At detailed design stage -
proposed to commence works program in July 2008.
|
|
Pinjar Road Realignment
|
$7.4 m
|
At detailed design stage. Awaiting clearing permit.
Tender July/August 2008.
|
|
Hepburn Avenue
|
$1.2 m
|
Tender approved – works to commence April 2008.
|
Statutory Compliance
The monthly financial report for the period ended 31 March
2008 complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995
and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Outcome 4 – Governance –
“Leadership and Community engagement to ensure the best use of our physical,
financial and human resources”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1 and 2.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the Financial Activity
Statements for the period ended 31 March 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Contracts and
Property
File Ref: P23/0010V02
File Name: CA Proposed Sale of Lot 2 Mather Drive
Neerabup to Western Power for a Substation Site.doc This line will not be
printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Manager Contracts & Property
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 1
Issue
To consider the sale of a 1.58-hectare site, being proposed
Lot 2 (Part Lot 4) Mather Drive, Neerabup, to Western Power.
Background
Lot 4 Flynn Drive, Neerabup (Lot 4) was purchased by the
City of Wanneroo in 1976 with a view to its long-term development potential.
The City of Wanneroo subsequently undertook a subdivision of approximately 27.5
hectares of the property on the corner of Flynn and Mather Drives. The
following land details are relevant for the remaining area:-
Address: 240
Flynn Drive, Neerabup
Area: 203.91 hectares
Title: Vol. 1963 Folio
202
Zoning (DPS2): Industrial Development
A detailed report (CS03-05/05) outlining a proposal for
Council to consider the subdivision of Lot 4 and incorporating a Business Plan
was presented to the Council meeting held on 17 May 2005. The
Business Plan was endorsed and authorisation granted for the advertising of a
public notice in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.59 of the Local
Government Act.
Following the public submission period, a further report
(CS04-08/05) was presented to the Council meeting held on 9 August 2005. After
consideration of the public submissions received, the following resolution was
adopted:-
“That Council:-
1. NOTES
the two public submissions received in response to the public notice advertised
in the Western Australian on Saturday 21 May 2005, dealing with the Business
Plan - “Proposed Subdivision of Lot 4 Flynn Drive, Neerabup”;
2. APPROVES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the staged subdivision of Lot 4 Flynn Drive, Neerabup for
the purpose of establishing an industrial development estate in accordance with
the approved Business Plan; and
3. NOTES
that outcomes from the preliminary planning process will be reported to a
subsequent Council meeting for consideration.”
At its meeting held on 31 January 2006, Council considered
confidential report CR01-01/06, dealing with a proposal to enter into a joint
venture (JV) with LandCorp for the subdivision development of the City’s and
LandCorp’s land in Neerabup. A draft Business Plan was included broadly
outlining the JV proposal in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of the
Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Following the public submission period, a further report
(CS07-05/06) was presented to the Council meeting held on 16 May 2006. There
were no public submissions received and the following resolution was adopted:-
“That Council:-
1.
NOTES that no public submissions were received in response to the
public notice advertised in the Western Australian Newspaper on 4 February
2006, dealing with the Business Plan – “Proposed Joint Venture for the
Subdivision of Lot 4 Flynn Drive, Neerabup”;
2.
APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the intent to enter into a Joint
Venture with LandCorp for the subdivision development of Lot 4 Flynn Drive,
Neerabup in accordance with the extended management function option outlined in
the approved Business Plan subject to:
a)
Agreement being reached on the Project Management Fee;
b)
Endorsement of the process for the calculation of the equity
split;
c)
Preparation of a suitable Joint Venture Agreement between the
City and LandCorp; and
d)
The inclusion of a requirement in the Joint Venture Agreement
that the Joint Management Group report its activities through the Steering
Committee to Council on a six monthly basis seeking endorsement of all proposed
land development and marketing strategies; and
3.
NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council seeking
approval to enter into the formal Agreement with LandCorp for the Joint Venture
detailed in 2. above, and outlining the relevant amendments to procedures and
delegations required to enable the Joint Venture.”
Negotiations are continuing with Landcorp regarding the
finalisation of the JV agreement which has been delayed because of uncertainty
over the land that the City will have available to contribute due to
environmental restrictions on development. In the interim LandCorp is
progressing with subdivision activity on Lot 22.
Western Power has advised it wishes to install a substation
in the Neerabup Industrial Area to service the development of the estate. An
existing site at Lot 40 Mather Drive owned by Western Power is subject to Bush
Forever development restrictions and therefore Western Power has requested that
the City sell it part of Lot 4 Flynn Drive, Neerabup as a site on which to
construct the substation.
Detail
The Western Australian Planning Commission has granted
subdivision approval to create two (2) Lots within Lot 4 Flynn Drive (Lots 1
and 2), Neerabup (Attachment 1 refers).
Western Power has been negotiating with the City to
purchase the 1.58-hectare Lot 2. A market valuation prepared by CB Richard
Ellis dated 1 February 2008 for a serviced lot designated a rate for the land
of $237.00 per square metre plus GST with a total land value of $3,744,600 plus
GST.
As the valuation received was based on a proportionately
large Lot, Administration contended that a higher rate per metre should apply.
As the lot size was dictated by Western Power and is larger than what would
ordinarily be brought to the market in that area, it was considered that there
was an opportunity cost to the City of not being able to develop smaller lots
with a higher rate per square metre land value.
Lots for Landcorp’s current Stage 1A industrial land tender
at Meridian Park, Neerabup range from a requested fixed tender price of $268.18
per square metre for a 4,177 square metre lot to $281.82 a square metre for a
2,503 square metre lot.
As a compromise Western Power has offered $268.18 per
square metre at a total value of $4,237,272.73 for Lot 2, fully serviced.
A certificate of title for the new Lot 2 will not be issued
until all services are available, which may not be until 2010. Transfer of the
land cannot take place until the title is issued, however, Western Power
requires certainty of the site to permit planning for the development. To
preserve the value of the transaction, interest will be payable by Western
Power from execution of an Agreement for Sale until settlement at the
Prescribed Rate in the Joint Form of General Conditions for the Sale of Land
(currently 9% per annum calculated daily).
Consultation
See Statutory Compliance section.
Comment
Western Power’s offer for Lot 2 is $31.18 per square metre
or $492,672.73 more than the valuation amount and is considered a good
financial result for the City, given the location of the lot and stage of
subdivision development.
The Mather Drive substation will provide essential electricity
supply to the Neerabup Industrial Area and the sale is supported. An Agreement
will be prepared to outline the relevant responsibilities of each party in
preparing the site and making appropriate payments on settlement.
Statutory Compliance
The actual subdivision development will need to comply with
all relevant planning and environmental requirements. In addition, the
disposition of land and JV has implications on the Local Government Act 1995
(the Act), including:-
Section 3.57 Tenders for Providing Goods and Services
The City and LandCorp as the Project Manager for the JV
will be bound by the requirements of this section of the Act and the applicable
regulations outlined in the Local Government (Functions and General)
Regulations 1996 (the Regulations) when dealing with contracts of a value
exceeding $100,000.
Section 3.58 of the Act prescribes the process by which
local governments may dispose of property. Effectively, land can be sold by:-
a) Public
auction to the highest bidder; or
b) Public Tender
to the most acceptable Tenderer; or
c) Private
Treaty negotiation, providing that prior to formally agreeing to the disposal,
details of the proposed sale are the subject of a public notice together with
an invitation for submissions. Any submissions must be considered by Council
when formally determining whether to proceed with the sale.
Section 30(2)(a)(c)(i) and (ii) of the Regulations provides
that land disposed of to the Crown or instrumentalities of the Crown are exempt
dispositions. Western Power is an instrumentality of the Crown; therefore Lot
2 can be sold without the requirement for a public notice process.
Section 3.59 of the Act deals with commercial enterprises
by local governments and defines the development of land as a Major Land Transaction.
The provision prescribes that:-
(2) Before it -
(a) commences a major
trading undertaking;
(b) enters into a major land
transaction; or
(c) enters into a land
transaction that is preparatory to entry into a major land transaction,
a local government is to
prepare a business plan.”
Business plans for the subdivision of Lot 4 and JV
arrangement with Landcorp have been advertised and considered by Council in
accordance with the Act and Regulations.
Strategic Implications
The provision of industrial land in the Neerabup Industrial
Estate is in line with the following objectives of the City’s Strategic Plan
2006-2021:-
“3.1 Increase availability of serviced commercial
and industrial land
3.2 Improve regional infrastructure”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The site earthworks will be completed within the existing
2008/09 budget for Lot 4. Subdivision and servicing costs will be budgeted for
in 2009/10. Sale proceeds are expected in 2009/10 or 2010/11.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
APPROVES the sale of Proposed Lot 2 Mather Drive, Neerabup to
Western Power for a sum of $4,237,272.73 plus GST with the sale to be concluded
within 30 days of the issue of the certificate of title; and
2.
AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to sign an Agreement for
Sale with Western Power to formalise the arrangement.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Community
Development
Community
Services
File Ref: SO7/0012VO3
File Name: AA Review of the City of Wanneroo Family
Day Care Scheme.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/
Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: A/ Team Leader Children’s Services
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the City’s role in the provision of children’s
services in Wanneroo.
Background
The City currently coordinates the provision of Family Day
Care (FDC) Services as a stand-alone children’s service in Wanneroo. The
industry changes experienced by the service have been an ongoing topic of
review and have resulted in several reports to Council in line with funding
agreement and contract deliberations. The most recent of these being on 17 July
2007 (report CD01-12/07 refers) where Council resolved in part to:
“2. APPROVE
the delivery of the Family Day Care Service for the period of the current
funding cycle, concluding 31 October 2008.
3.
ENDORSE administration to explore opportunities for amalgamation with
other Schemes as a long term opportunity for sustainability, with a further
status report to be presented to Council as part of the 2008/09 budget
considerations.”
As part of the ongoing assessment of the City’s role in the
delivery of children’s services, administration seeks Council consideration of
the available options for the City’s future role in not only Family Day Care
but the broader children’s services environment.
Detail
The City’s Family Day Care Scheme currently
has 318 children (229 families) registered for care and twenty-six (26)
independently licensed Carers. (Figures sourced from the December 2007
operating report).
The key issues to consider in this report
are:
-
Family Day Care
-
Children’s Services industry issues
-
Future Opportunities for Children’s Services
1. Family Day Care
In 2006, an independent
consultant explored the City’s role in the future provision of childcare
services (report CD 07-10/06 refers). This was in response to the considerable
changes experienced by the industry over the past few years. These key drivers
of changes have included:
·
Significant changes to the licensing requirements of the
Childcare Licensing and Standards Unit for both new applicants and existing
Carers
·
Accreditation requirements of the Family Day Care Quality
Assurance System
·
A national trend of decline in the numbers of Carers operating a
Family Day Care Service
·
Removal of pre-existing boundary restrictions by the Commonwealth
Government in July 2006 resulting in more open competition and alternate
options for Carers
·
Implementation of a change in the funding model in October 2006
by the Commonwealth Government resulted in a significant reduction ($90,489.55)
in Commonwealth Network Support.
·
Four alternative schemes currently coordinating and recruiting
carers registered with their schemes in the Northern suburbs.
2. Environmental Issues
·
Changes in the environment of Family Day Care Services delivery
as evidenced by the closure of two neighbouring schemes in 2007 and the resulting
establishment of larger schemes. This change necessitates economies of scale,
which impacts on smaller schemes such as Wanneroo. The lack of success in
recruitment of new carers has impacted on Wanneroo’s capacity to grow its
scheme.
·
Other industry providers are also facing the same significant
issues: the Home Based Child Care Alliance between three Northern Suburbs FDC
Schemes has been working collaboratively on an executive and operational level
to address sustainability issues associated with the ongoing delivery of Family
Day Care.
·
Due to massive growth in the City, there is a considerable
increase in Long Day Care Centres resulting in an over supply
of childcare places in Wanneroo.
·
Existing gaps in service delivery have been identified in the
8-12 years age group including after-school programs and recreation. Patterns
of anti-social of behaviour at this age are often seen to result in
considerable problems in adolescence ie 12-18 years.
·
Early Years programs are seen as an industry priority and
increased funding opportunities are available through local Early Years Action
groups
·
The need for a School Liaison role has been identified across
areas of the City’s administration including Rangers, Environmental Health,
Libraries and Heritage.
3. Future Opportunities for Children’s Services
There is a need for a
coordinated, consistent and strategic approach to the delivery of sustainable
childcare services and facilities for the significant cohort of 0-14 yrs olds
in the City’s population
Future population statistics for
children in Wanneroo:
|
2011 Age group
|
% total population in Wanneroo
|
|
0-4yrs
|
8.3%
|
|
5-9yrs
|
8.3%
|
|
10-14 yrs
|
7.9%
|
|
|
|
|
2021 Age group
|
% total population in Wanneroo
|
|
0-4 yrs
|
8.1%
|
|
5-9yrs
|
8.3%
|
|
10-14yrs
|
8.0%
|
The City wishes to maintain its
established reputation of delivering quality services to its ratepayers, and in
anticipation of future growth in the area, is keen to plan service delivery
models that are innovative and flexible to meet the needs of the target group.
If the City decides to
discontinue its provision of a Family Day Care Service, the Children’s Services
unit has the capacity of broaden its activities into other areas of service
delivery that are in line with the City’s broader strategic plan. The current
focus of Commonwealth and State Government and the community on the importance
of the Early Years and the nutrition and physical activity of children 0-12
years offers other funding opportunities for the children’s services area.
Existing staff
resources could transfer into a School Liaison officer role that implements and delivers a more effective coordinated approach of the
current school programs across the City’s Health Services, Environmental,
Wetlands Program, and Ranger and Safety Services.
The appointment of an Early
Years officer would build on the City’s current role working with the existing
Early Years (0-8 years) Action Groups and Parent Support agencies to deliver
accessible and effective programs. The City’s Parenting Place Project based at Clarkson
Library is an example of a partnership from the Early Years funding stream.
Comment
The recent industry changes as reported have resulted in a
continued reduction in viability and sustainability for the FDC. The changing
environment has seen the continued development of larger schemes with an
accompanying suite of complementary children’s services. The FDC services once
provided exclusively by the scheme in the City are now a duplication of effort
with no measurable advantages over the services on offer from other schemes.
There exists a real opportunity for the City to provide an
enhanced and broader model for children’s services that does not duplicate
existing levels of service provision and would prove to be of benefit to the
whole of the City’s residents.
The main options and ramifications for Council to consider
are
Option 1: Continue the provision of Family Day Care
within the City of Wanneroo
·
Continued operating deficit to Council of $150,000 p.a. with
possible increases as an outcome of other proposed industry changes
·
The implementation of the new Commonwealth Child Care Management
System for processing child care benefits is mandatory by July 2008: There will be a substantial increase in cost of approximately $3,500
one-off costs to meet this requirement by the funding body.
·
Difficulty in attracting staff based on short term contracts
reliant on service funding in times of low unemployment
·
Duplication of provision of services since the abolition of
boundaries for FDC Schemes in 2006. Currently there are four Quality Assured
Accredited FDC schemes operating in the Northern Suburbs. These larger schemes
have complementary family support services offering broader strengths-based
approach to supporting children and families, as opposed to the single stream
service offered by the City.
·
External influences will continue to have a negative impact on
the viability of recruiting and expanding the service including the lengthy
licensing process, changes to State Child Care, Child Care Benefit compliance,
low unemployment
·
The impact of an over supply of childcare places
in the City of Wanneroo and the national trend of declining numbers of Carers
operating a Family Day Care service will be considerable.
·
Meeting the accreditation requirements of the
Family Day Care Quality Assurance System and significant changes to the Family
Day Care licensing requirements for Family Day Care will continue to absorb
existing resources and limit any capacity to focus on community development
initiatives.
·
Ongoing active marketing of the Scheme and FDC as a career
business opportunity has proven to be unsuccessful in increasing the numbers of
Carers and the level of childcare usage, despite closure of other neighbouring
schemes in 2007.
Option 2: Cease Family Day Care operations and not
initiate alternate model
·
Elimination of funding deficit of $150,000 pa.
·
The reporting requirements for closure of the scheme and the
re-allocation of resources including the Toy Library will require staff
resources in the short term.
·
Loss of opportunity to meet broader demand in
children’s services
·
Staff redundancies would need to be considered
·
Missed opportunity to implement broader
servicing of the Children’s Services area – contribute to growing gaps in
alternate program delivery of complementary children’s programs.
Option 3: Cease the provision of Family Day Care
services and introduce new model
·
All externally provided income reduces to zero.
·
The reporting requirements for closure of the scheme and the
re-allocation of resources including the Toy Library will require staff
resources.
·
Redeployment opportunities for staff from the Children’s Services
would be explored.
·
A new direction / vision of the City’s
Children’s Service Unit role will potentially impact positively not only on the
Families who have children between 0 – 12 years (22,940 of the Wanneroo
population in 2006) but also their communities. In
comparison, the primary focus is in the delivery of one service that is being
accessed by 229 families.
·
Families would be able to remain with their current Carer and
transfer to another scheme with minimal disruption. Administration levy costs
to the families may differ. Families may suffer childcare disruptions if Carer
ceases and family need to seek alternative care arrangements.
·
Existing Carers would be able to join an alternative scheme and
transfer administration requirements to their new scheme or operate privately
(outside of existing scheme arrangements without childcare benefit support).
Increase in costs may result if a Carer decides to operate privately.
·
The use of existing staff resources would
support the City to implement and deliver a more effective coordinated approach
of the current school programs across the City’s Health Services,
Environmental, Wetlands Program, and Ranger and Safety Services.
·
The current focus of Commonwealth and State Government and the
community on the importance on the Early Years and the nutrition and physical
activity of children 0 to 12 years, offers other funding opportunities for the
Children’s Services area.
·
The role of advocating for quality childcare within the City
would be retained.
Comparison of Staffing for Three Options
|
Option 1
Continue service
|
Option 2
Cease service
|
Option 3
Cease service introduce new model
|
Budget Increase/ decrease from 07/08
budget figures
|
|
1FTE permanent position Children’s Services Officer (Level 5)
|
Redundancy for 1FTE permanent position
Children’s Services Officer (Level 5)
|
Redeployment to other duties as School
Liaison Officer (Level 6) for Community liaison, school engagement role
|
+ $4,967 pa
|
|
1Part Time Admin permanent position (Level 3)
|
Redeployment for 1Part Time Admin
permanent position (Level 3)
|
Redeployed to other duties
|
Nil
|
|
2 x Part Time Children’s Services
Officers (Level 5) linked to contract funding
|
Cease contracts
|
Redeployment 1 x .8FTE Early Years
Project Officer (Level 6) to source expanded grant funding for EY and develop
new EY focus or Cease contracts
|
- $33,892 pa
|
|
1 x Team Leader linked to contract
funding
|
Cease contract
|
Cease contract
|
- $59, 258 pa
|
Administration recommends Option 3 for these reasons:
·
The new structure will enable the School Liaison Officer role and
Early Years Officer role to work cohesively with Community Development staff
and relevant officers from other internal business units exploring and
promoting innovative programs to meet the needs of the child population within
the City of Wanneroo. The initiatives listed above are indicative opportunities
that would naturally need to be developed through existing administrative
processes and Council approvals.
·
The new model will potentially impact positively not only on the
families who have children between 0-12 years (22,940 of the Wanneroo
population in 2006) but also their communities. In comparison the primary focus
of Option 1 is in the delivery of one service that is being accessed by 229
families.
Carers and Families To Be Supported Through Transition
Process
If carers and by association, families, decide to transfer
to an alternative scheme, provision would be made to support this transition.
This is to ensure that the Carers would be well informed regarding the choices
they have within the Family Day Care industry.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Currently the provision of the City’s Family Day Care
service is consistent with the City’s strategic plan in the following Social,
Economic and Governance areas as well as developing the City’s
role in ensuring the protection of children, promoting their needs, rights and
opportunities. Therefore initiating the first steps to become a child friendly
city.
“2. SOCIAL:
Healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities
2.3.1 Provide
or facilitate access to services and facilities that support inclusive
communities
3. ECONOMIC:
A prosperous region achieved through economic growth and employment
3.5.1 Promote life – long
learning and targeted industry training
3.5.2 Encourage workforce
participation and local employment placement
3.5.3 Attract training
agencies and programs into the City
3.6.1 Promote business
assistance and support networks
3.6.2 Encourage home- based
businesses
4. GOVERNANCE:
Leadership and community engagement ensure the best use of our physical,
financial and human resources.
Establish and actively manage
a range of partnerships that add value to our services and support the changing
and diverse needs of the community.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Option 1: If the City was to continue the current funding agreement
between the Australian Government’s Department
of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and the City of Wanneroo Family Day Care Scheme, this
would result in an ongoing operational deficit of approximately $150,000 p.a.
with the real possibility of further operational cost escalations.
Option 2: If the City were to cease its operations in Family Day
Care and not embrace the proposed new children’s services model, there would be
an operational saving of approximately $150,000 p.a. Non-financial
considerations would be the lost opportunities for service improvement to the
broader community and continued gaps in the suite of children’s services.
Option 3: An operating budget for a new Children’s Services model
consists of $131,167 expenditure including staff and on-costs, and anticipated
$20,000 of additional Early Years grant funding. The comparison of the
existing model with the proposed new model results in an operational saving of
$39,268.
Below is a table showing the
current financial structure and the proposed financial results structure.
|
|
New Model
|
Family Day Care
|
|
Income
|
$20,000
|
$665,129
|
|
Expenses
|
$131,167
|
$815,564
|
|
Net Operating Results
|
-$111,167
|
-$150,435
|
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES
the termination of contract for the provision of the Family Day Care Service
between the City of Wanneroo and the Australian Government’s Department of
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs effective from 30
June 2008;
2. CONSIDERS
the new model for Children’s Services as proposed in the 2008/09 budget
deliberations;
3. INSTRUCTS
Administration to ensure that wherever possible a smooth and supported
transition of service sponsors is provided to Carers and families.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Leisure &
Cultural Services
File Ref: P/0031V02
File Name: BA Future Management of Kingsway Indoor
Stadium.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director
Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: A/Manager Leisure & Cultural Services
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider management options for the Kingsway Indoor
Stadium beyond 30 June 2008.
Background
The Kingsway Indoor Stadium (the Stadium) was developed by
the Wanneroo Districts Netball Association (WDNA) with significant financial
assistance from the City of Wanneroo and a grant from the Department of Sport
& Recreation (DSR). The Commonwealth Bank held security over the lease for
the funds extended to WDNA for its contribution. In 1999, it became evident
that the WDNA could not meet its facility management obligations and as a
result Council approved the surrender of the lease and sought expressions of
interest for the leasing of the Stadium.
The lease was subsequently awarded to the Badminton
Association of Western Australia (BAWA) for a period of 35 years with
expiration due on 9 January 2035. Under the terms of the lease the BAWA were
responsible for the payment of all rates and taxes, building maintenance,
operating costs, and the payment of rent. However, following a review of BAWA
by DSR in November 2005, it was ascertained that responsibility for the management
of the Stadium put the Association in an untenable position where total
liabilities exceed total assets. This review also identified two proposed
scenarios for the future management of the facility:
·
Scenario 1 The City of Wanneroo undertakes
facility management and provides a lump sum payment and priority facility usage
to BAWA.
·
Scenario 2 A Private Management Group is
appointed by BAWA to undertake day-to-day management of the facility.
Upon consideration of this proposal at the Ordinary Council
Meeting on 29 August 2006 (Report CD13-08/06) it was resolved that the Chief
Executive Officer would advise BAWA that whilst the City supported the
termination of the lease in-principle, the two proposed management scenarios
were not supported. Subsequently, Administration negotiated further with BAWA
and established mutually acceptable lease termination arrangements including
the surrender of the BAWA lease on an ‘as is basis’ thus waiving any future
obligations under the provisions of the lease, the provision of office space
for BAWA on an ongoing basis, payment of a one-off ex gratia sum to support the
re-establishment of the Association, and handover of the Stadium to the City of
Wanneroo on 1 January 2007.
The decision to directly manage the Stadium provided the
City with the opportunity to provide a community recreation facility
accommodating a wide range of sport and leisure activities for local
residents. In doing so it was acknowledged that the Stadium would be deficit
funded with Administration seeking to ensure the effective management of the
funding deficit within approved budget parameters. The termination of the BAWA
lease and subsequent management of the Stadium by the City was endorsed,
unanimously and by absolute majority, at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 31
October 2006 (Report CD11-10/06). Notably, the resolution included a
requirement for Administration to report back to Council advising outcomes of
facility operations during the 18 month period between 1 January 2007 and 30
June 2008, and providing recommendations for the future management of the
Stadium beyond 30 June 2008.
Detail
Kingsway Indoor Stadium Progress Report – January 2007
to May 2008
Interim Workforce
Plan
The key focus during this interim period from 1 January
2007 to 30 June 2008 has been to establish the Stadium as a community
recreation facility that provides a wide range of community based leisure
activities, rather than purely sporting competition orientated activities. In
order to facilitate improved service delivery levels Administration implemented
an interim staffing structure including the following appointments:
·
1 x Stadium Manager (full time)
·
1 x Programming Officer (full time)
·
2 x Administration Officers (part time)
·
1 x Centre Assistant (part time)
Facility
Programming & Services
This staffing structure has enabled the growth of regular
facility bookings, attraction of major events, establishment of new programs,
and the promotion of the facility. There is a wide variety of regular facility
bookings now accommodated at the facility including badminton, table tennis,
indoor soccer, netball, inline skating, martial arts, playgroup, religious
groups, education groups, physiotherapists and local schools. There are
currently 33 separate regular facility hirers and the Stadium has also
accommodated a variety of community functions including community group
dinners, sporting club functions, and religious group functions.
The Stadium has also attracted a number of successful
events including the following:
·
WA Floorball (Indoor Hockey) Championships – May 2007
·
International Fencing Tournament – June 2007
·
WA State Archery Championships – August 2007
·
WA Inline Speed Skating Championships – January 2008
·
WA Artistic Skating Championships – June 2008
·
National Seniors Table Tennis Championships – October 2008
·
National Transplant Games – October 2008
·
National Artistic Skating Championships – November 2008
A number of new programming initiatives have also been
implemented new initiatives including an indoor soccer competition, ladies and
mixed netball competitions, group fitness classes, and multisport school
holiday program.
Facility
Maintenance
Administration has undertaken a significant amount of
general maintenance works to improve the overall quality of the Stadium since
the handover from BAWA. Specific maintenance items undertaken since 1 January
2007 include the following:
·
Re-keying of the facility
·
Change of the alarm monitoring service
·
Transfer of services contracts
·
Office fit-out including IT equipment
·
Painting/recarpeting of the function room, activity room and
meeting room
·
Purchase of new tables and chairs
·
General improvement and maintenance of external landscaping
·
Bird proofing of the facility
·
Repair of roof leaks
·
Replacement of main arena lights
·
Painting of the foyer
·
Installation of anti-termite baits and scheduled replacement of
damaged timber on main arena
No significant capital works, other than those necessary to
maintain facility integrity, have been undertaken on the basis that the Stadium
should be programmed based on existing infrastructure until such time as
Council determines the long-term management scenario for the facility.
Strategic Facility
Planning
Administration have progressed the development of a number
of strategic planning documents including the Kingsway Indoor Stadium Draft
Business Plan and Draft Marketing & Communications Plan. The Business Plan
includes an analysis of the facility catchment, competitor analysis, facility
sales and usage projections, and the identification of key performance
indicators. The Draft Marketing & Communications Plan identifies the need
to establish a brand for the facility to promote its function as a multipurpose
community facility. These strategies are based on the key objectives to engage
community participation and raise awareness of the City’s commitment to
promoting healthy lifestyles.
Summary
Overall, the focus for Administration since January 2007
has been to put in place the fundamentals required for the effective management
of the Stadium into the future. This has included the implementation of a
facility maintenance program, the establishment of community orientated
programs, and the preparation of strategic business planning documentation.
Administration have faced a number of impediments including a lack of
historical data for the Stadium, lack of previous facility management
practices, the very low profile of the Stadium amongst the community, and the
lack of ancillary services such as a crèche to augment program growth. The key
focus areas have been as follows:
·
Developing positive relationships with existing user groups
·
Maintaining a clean and well presented facility
·
Developing a sound appreciation for the nature of the business
·
Development of core programs and events utilising the existing
facility layout
·
Responsibly managing the subsidy of the facility within budget
parameters
As a result of the interim management period Administration
are now well placed to progress the operations of the Stadium to achieve
greater facility utilisation, increase the number of programs and program
occupancy rates, achieve greater awareness amongst the community, and attain an
improved financial bottom line result within the subsidy provided by Council.
Kingsway Indoor Stadium – Management Options
It is considered that there are two viable options for
future management of the Stadium:
Option 1 – City of Wanneroo Management
This option involves Council’s commitment to the ongoing
management and operations of the Stadium with a key focus on increasing community
usage and decreasing the facility budget deficit. It provides the opportunity
for Council to achieve community development outcomes through the delivery of a
variety of leisure programs and services, and the provision of facility hire
for local community groups. This management option will also provide a greater
ability to deliver targeted programs and services to the community, in
particular those that promote physical activity and socialisation across all
age groups. The growth of these programs can be supplemented by the future
establishment of crèche and kiosk services to provide users with the complete
leisure facility experience, whilst also providing the City with secondary
spend opportunities.
Direct management will also enable Administration to
continue to attract major events, particularly State and National
Championships, that provide supplementary income and promote the City’s tourism
and economic development aspirations. In addition, this management option will
allow the Stadium to assume responsibility for the management of the Kingsway
Regional Sporting Complex thus complementing the current infrastructure
redevelopments. The delivery of improved management processes for the complex
is a vital consideration given the significant capital investment by Council in
redeveloping existing infrastructure.
Whilst this management option will have a financial impact
on Council in terms of ongoing operational and capital expenditure costs, it
will allow programs and services to be tailored to meet community demands.
This will result in a focus towards community development outcomes rather than
purely the maximisation of revenue generation, and as such, the Stadium would
provide programs and services that are less profitable in a financial sense but
make a greater contribution to the community good. It should also be noted
that the establishment of the Stadium as a multipurpose community facility will
negate the need for any Council funded, built community infrastructure on the
nearby Darch Community Purpose Site which is located just 800 metres away.
In summary, the identifiable positive and negative aspects
of the City of Wanneroo managing the Stadium are as follows:
|
Positive
Aspects
|
Negative
Aspects
|
|
·
Ability to target programs to those socially vulnerable, thus
achieving community development outcomes
·
Promotion of tourism within the City of Wanneroo by attracting
State and National Sporting Events
·
Provision of direct management for the entire Kingsway Regional
Sporting Complex from the Stadium
·
Opportunity for kiosk and crèche services to provide additional
facility income sources
·
Direct management of a modern community sport, recreation and
leisure facility
·
Capitalisation on programming, facility maintenance, staffing,
and business planning investment by Administration over the last 18 months
·
Ability to consider other uses for the Darch Community Purpose
Site thus reducing pressure on the capital works program
|
·
Ongoing financial commitment to supplement the facility
operating budget deficit
·
Requirement to increase Stadium staffing levels to facilitate
program development and improved service delivery
·
Requirement to commit capital works funds to improve facility
aesthetics and develop fit for purpose amenities
·
Limitations on operating the Stadium on a fully commercial
basis due to the need to retain broad community access and meet resident
expectations
|
Option 2 – Private Management Group
This option involves the negotiation of a management
contract with a private company to manage the Stadium on the City’s behalf.
The structure of such a contract allows the private company to assume the
financial risk of operating the facility in return for retaining any
operational surplus above the budgeted income payments to Council. Contract
management may allow the Stadium to introduce new initiatives to realise
efficiencies, move core operations to another party, facilitate innovative
service delivery, and provide a partner in any capital
development/extension/refurbishment of the Stadium.
Private companies currently manage the following Local
Government community facilities within the Perth metropolitan area:
·
Aquajetty – YMCA on behalf of the City of Rockingham
·
Belmont Oasis Leisure Centre – Belgravia Leisure on behalf of the
City of Belmont
·
Carramar & Marangaroo Golf Courses – Duncan & Crosbie
Golf on behalf of the City of Wanneroo
·
Loftus Recreation Centre – Belgravia Leisure on behalf of the
Town of Vincent
·
Point Walter Golf Course – Belgravia Leisure on behalf of the
City of Melville
·
Morley Sport & Recreation Centre – YMCA on behalf of the City
of Bayswater
This option, due to its commercial nature, will result in a
strong focus towards profitability rather than the achievement of community
development outcomes. Private companies have the ability to implement a more
flexible employment model, have access to a broader range of service providers,
and implement alternative maintenance models whish enables costs to be kept
lower that Local Government. However, the level of fees and charges levied by
private companies is typically higher on average than Local Government, due to
the City’s requirement to ensure access by the community and need to take into
account ratepayer and resident expectations.
In addition, whilst the contract management of community
facilities has been successful throughout many Local Government Authorities,
particularly those within the Eastern States, there are also recent examples
within the Western Australian context where such management arrangements have
proven problematic. In summary, the identifiable positive and negative aspects
of a Private Management Group operating the Stadium are as follows:
|
Positives
|
Negatives
|
|
·
Ability to shift responsibility for general facility operating
costs from Council to a private company
·
Ability to shift facility operational responsibilities,
including staffing, from Administration to a private company
·
Implementation of innovative service and program delivery
beyond the normal standards provided by Local Government
·
Private company may be a partner in future capital works
projects and/or facility improvements, thus reducing pressure on municipal
funds
·
Opportunity to implement a more flexible employment model and
gain access to a broader range of service providers
·
Less inclined to provide non-profit making services, thus
increasing income generation and significantly reducing operating deficit
|
·
Limited to selection of those private management groups that
express an interest in managing the Stadium
·
Reduced capacity to target programs and services, thus limiting
the achievement of strong community development outcomes
·
Surplus operational income above budgeted amounts retained by
the management group rather than Council
·
Level of fees and charges levied by private management groups
generally needs to be higher than Local Government to make the operations
viable
·
Capital works requirements to improve facility aesthetics and
develop fit for purpose amenities may still require municipal funding
·
Inability to centralise management of the Kingsway Regional
Sporting Complex from the Stadium
·
Possibility of the Stadium proving to be non-financially viable
for a private company, thus requiring Council to reassume management at short
notice
|
Comment
The management of the Stadium from 1 January 2007 to May 2008
has allowed Administration to assess the standard of the facility, programs and
services that were previously provided under BAWA’s management. Whilst direct
management during this interim period required investment by Council in
establishing a staff structure, undertaking necessary maintenance, and
improving service delivery standards there have been immediate improvements in
terms of increased access for the local community. The interim management
period has provided Administration with a greater understanding of the facility
and local community demands, and thus led to the development of key strategic
planning documents including a Business Plan and Marketing & Communications
Plan.
In considering a future facility management option, the
fundamental difference between the City of Wanneroo and Private Management
Group to consider is in regards to the outcomes being sought. Private
management, by nature, will seek to maximise profitability by providing
programs and services that focus on the generation of revenue and therefore
profit.
Management by the City will also seek to maximise revenue
generation, however will typically seek to balance this with the attainment of
broader community development principles. Whilst this will require deficit
funding by Council it will also allow a measured response to the social needs
and demands of ratepayers and residents. In this respect, direct management by
the City of Wanneroo will promote the creation of healthy, safe, vibrant and
connected communities.
Statutory Compliance
Should Council wish to consider a lease with a private
management company then negotiations would need to comply with the requirements
of Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995. In this instance, unless the
lease resulted from a tender or auction process the public notice provisions of
Section 3.58 (3) would apply.
Strategic Implications
Management of the Stadium by Council will support the
following Social Outcomes as stated within the Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2.1 Increase choice and
quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation”
Policy Implications
Management of the Stadium by Council will require
amendments to the City’s Fees & Charges Policy. Under the current policy,
facilities are defined as multipurpose community and recreation buildings
supplied by the City and available for hire by the general community. The
policy does not apply to the City’s:
·
Administration and Civic Centre at 23 Dundebar Rd, Wanneroo.
·
Aquamotion Aquatic Centre in Wanneroo.
·
Golf courses located at Marangaroo and Carramar.
·
Any facility throughout the City currently under a lease
agreement as defined by the City of Wanneroo Tenancy Policy.
The policy will require amendment to include the Stadium as
a facility where the policy does not apply in order to achieve income
aspirations, and reduce the operating deficit.
Financial Implications
In preparation for the possible continuation of management
by the City, Administration has prepared a Draft 2008/09 Stadium Operating
Budget. Whilst this draft budget is currently being reviewed and amended prior
to presentation to Council for consideration, the initial income and
expenditure projections are as follows:
|
General Operating Income 2008/09
|
$386,150
|
|
General Operating Expenditure 2008/09
|
$620,030
|
|
Net Operating Deficit 2008/09
|
($233,880)
|
It should be noted the facility income projections in
2008/09 have been conservative whilst expenditure projections include initial
investments in core requirements such as kiosk fit-out, contract labour for
sports umpires, and crèche establishment expenses. The Draft 2008/09 Operating
Budget also includes the implementation of the Stadium Workforce Plan to
facilitate the introduction of new programs, improve service delivery, and
support additional income generation. In summary, the proposed staff structure
is as follows:
|
Proposed New
Position
|
Employment
Status Type
|
Net Cost
|
Position
Rationale
|
|
Program Officer
|
1 x Full time
|
$63,079
|
Facilitate the development and implementation of new
programs and services.
|
|
Kiosk Supervisor
|
1 x Part time
|
$28,992
|
Initiate kiosk operations to provide secondary spend
income opportunities.
|
|
Crèche Supervisor
|
1 x Part time
|
$15,335
|
Initiate crèche operations to facilitate establishment of
new programs and services.
|
|
Crèche Assistant
|
1 x Part time
|
$13,321
|
Support crèche operations to facilitate establishment of
new programs and services.
|
|
Customer Service Officer
|
2 x Part time
|
$32,858
|
Provide facility front counter customer service during
peak programming periods.
|
|
TOTAL
|
$153,585
|
|
A number of capital works items have also been included
within the City’s Draft Forward Capital Works Program 2008/09 – 2012/13 for
consideration. These proposed items include the following:
|
Proposed New
Project
|
Proposed
Financial Year
|
Project Cost
|
|
Conversion of current massage therapy room into a crèche
facility.
|
2008/09
|
$30,000
|
|
Installation of court dividing netting to allow
separation of main arena
|
2008/09
|
$22,000
|
|
Court resurfacing and line marking upgrades
|
2008/09
|
$120,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
$172,000
|
Given the current pressures on the City’s Forward Capital
Works Program these capital items can be deferred to subsequent financial
years, however the ability to implement new program initiatives and
subsequently increase facility income will be impacted. These issues will be
addressed through the consideration of the 2008/09 – 2012/13 Forward Capital
Works Program.
Stadium maintenance requirements have also been included
within the City’s Draft 2008/09 Maintenance Budget for consideration.
In particular, following recent inspections of the main
arena flooring remedial works have been included in this budget to repair
damage caused by termites. Anti-termite treatments have also been implemented,
and will continue to be monitored through the Building Maintenance budget, to
ensure the ongoing integrity of the main arena.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES
the continuation of direct management of the Kingsway Indoor Stadium by the
City of Wanneroo from 30 June 2008 onwards.
2. NOTES
that the Kingsway Indoor Stadium 2008/09 Operating Budget will be presented to
Council for consideration.
3. NOTES
that the Kingsway Indoor Stadium capital works requirements have been included
within the City’s Forward Capital Works Program 2008/09 – 2012/13 for
consideration.
4. NOTES
that the Kingsway Indoor Stadium Fees & Charges have been included within
the City’s 2008/09 Schedule of Fees & Charges for consideration.
5. NOTES
that the Kingsway Indoor Stadium Business Plan and Marketing &
Communications Plan will be provided for information.
6. AUTHORISES
Administration to investigate alternative options for the Darch Community
Purpose Site given the close proximity of the Kingsway Indoor Stadium.
7. NOTES
that Administration will undertake a review of the City’s Fees and Charges
Policy including necessary amendments based upon the direct management of the
Kingsway Indoor Stadium.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0056V02
Responsible Officer: A/Director
Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: A/Manager Leisure & Cultural Services
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
File Name: BA Usage of Liddell Park for Silvers
Circus.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the use of Liddell Park, Girrawheen for Silvers
Circus in June/July 2008.
Background
Administration received an Event Approval Application from
Silvers Circus in March 2008 requesting the usage of Liddell Park from either
16 to 29 June or 23 June to 20 July 2008. Whilst the City’s Circuses Policy
recognises the importance of circuses as community events for residents, it is
also cognisant of growing concern at the use of animals for performance as well
as the need for locations for such entertainment to be capable accommodating
the large number of expected attendees. Subsequently, the policy supports the
provision of circus type entertainment within the City only at locations where
in the opinion of the Chief Executive Officer, that adequate car parking
facilities and public transportation options are available.
Within the City’s Circuses Policy, the Wanneroo
Showgrounds is the only venue permitted for circus type entertainment and/or
events. Any other location sought by a proponent will be rejected, unless in
the view of the Chief Executive Officer, the proposal has merit. Under these
circumstances the Chief Executive Officer may forward the proposal to Council
for consideration. At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 19 July 2005 (Report
CD03-07/05) the use of Liddell Park was endorsed as a venue for Circus Joseph
Ashton from 19 September to 9 October 2005 based upon adherence to specific
event approval criteria including the provision of temporary car parking, consultation
with surrounding residences, and submission of all relevant environmental
health applications. On this basis, the Silvers Circus request to utilise
Liddell Park requires consideration by Council prior to any approval being
granted.
Detail
Silvers Circus is based in Hawksburn, Victoria and since
forming in 1975 has been established itself as one of Australia’s premier scale
touring circus shows. The big top circus only includes feats that challenge
the human body, thus does not include performances with animals, and is
currently based at Langley Park in Perth from 2 April to 25 May 2008. The
Silvers Circus Event Approval Application submitted to Administration includes
relevant information pertaining to development and health, park operations, security,
traffic management, and waste services management. It is considered that their
initial application is in good order apart from their request to use a venue
(namely Liddell Park) not included within the City’s Circuses Policy.
In 2005 when considering the use of Liddell Park for Circus
Joseph Ashton, Administration ascertained that this venue was the most
appropriate alternative venue for circus type entertainment should the Wanneroo
Showgrounds not be available.
As the Wanneroo Showgrounds are once again unavailable due
to prior bookings by the Wanneroo Football Club and Wanneroo Swapmeets, the
same locational criteria utilised in 2005 are relevant. Liddell Park has a
temporary car park available by utilising the adjacent Templeton Park, has sufficient
public transport links on Wanneroo and Beach Roads, and has previously been
utilised for community events and concerts. In addition, Liddell Park is a
highly visible location with roadways on three sides hence reducing impacts on
surrounding residents.
Based upon the venue being approved for Silvers Circus the
proponent will be required to meet a number of specific event approval
criteria, including, but limited to the following:
·
Application to Construct, Extend or Alter a Public Building
(Health Public Building Regulations 1992)
·
Application for Certificate of Approval (Health Public Building
Regulations 1992)
·
Provision of a Certificate of Electrical Compliance (Health
Public Building Regulations 1992)
·
Application for a Street Trading Licence (Trading in Public
Places Local Law 1999)
·
Provision of approximate numbers of patrons to be in attendance
during any one day/session and the number of toilets (male, female and
disabled) proposed for the event
·
Provision of a Acoustic Consultants Report on all installations
(eg. generators, amplified music, PA systems) and activities (eg. vehicle
movements) providing actual sound level measurements to ensure compliance with
the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1986)
·
Application for a Building Licence
·
Adherence to the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations
1997
·
Notification to Local Police and Ranger Services of show times
and dates
·
Provision of adequate Waste Management Practices
·
Payment of applicable Park Hire and Bond charges as per the Adopted
2007/08 Fees & Charges Schedule
·
Completion of direct consultation with all residents located
within 400 metres of Liddell Park informing them of show times and dates
Comment
The unavailability of the Wanneroo Showgrounds and
assessment that Liddell Park is suitable for circus-type entertainment supports
the request from Silvers Circus to utilise Liddell Park for their event in June
and/or July 2008. Regardless, approval of the Silvers Circus Event Approval
Application is subject to the completion of all relevant applications and
adherence to relevant regulations as determined by Administration.
It is considered that the location of the circus at Liddell
Park will be of benefit to residents whilst strict adherence to the Circuses
Policy and Event Approval Process will ensure that any community concerns
relating to this event are adequately addressed.
Statutory Compliance
A circus event at any location within the City of Wanneroo
will be required to comply with relevant local laws, policies, guidelines and
conditions. These include:
·
City of Wanneroo Local Laws
·
City of Wanneroo Circuses Policy
·
Code of Practice for the Conduct of Circuses in Western Australia
·
Current Western Australian legislation relevant to the welfare of
animals, health and
public
buildings
Strategic Implications
The facilitation of circus events at locations within the
City of Wanneroo is consistent with the ‘Social Outcomes’ identified within the
City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021, as follows:
“2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood
and lifestyle options
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation”
Policy Implications
The Circuses Policy does not contain a delegated authority
provision for the Chief Executive Officer to nominate approved grounds. The
policy provides for a referral to Council for a decision on the usage of venues
other than the Wanneroo Showgrounds.
Financial Implications
As per the 2007/08 Fees & Charges Schedule there will
be a $2,650 bond payable by Silvers Circus. Normal park hire fees at
commercial hire rates will also be applicable, and based on the proposed dates
will be between $3,900.00 and $8,200.00.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
AUTHORISES the use of Liddell Park, Girrawheen to host Silvers Circus in
June and/or July 2008 subject to the proponent completing the following:
a) Submission
and approval of the following Development & Health requirements –
i) Application
to construct, extend or alter a public building (Form 1 – Health Public
Building Regulations 1992)
ii) Application
for certificate of approval (Form 2 – Health Public Building Regulations 1992)
iii) Certificate
of electrical compliance (Form 5 – Health Public Building Regulations 1992)
iv) Application
for a street trading licence (Trading in Public Places Local Law 1999)
v) Management
of waste documentation (animal manures and putrescible waste)
vi) Provision
of approximate patrons expected during any one day/session and the subsequent
number of toilets to be provided
vii)
Provision of an Acoustic Consultants Report
viii)
Application for a Building Licence
b) Liddell
Park being returned to a litter free state at the completion of the event.
c) Adherence
to the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.
d) Adherence
to the relevant clauses within the Code of Practice for the Conduct of Circuses
in Western Australia and the City of Wanneroo Circuses Policy.
e) Utilisation
of Templeton Park as a temporary carpark during show times and the mobilisation
of the City’s Rangers to enforce relevant Parking Local Laws.
f) Provision
of a site map identifying the area of the park accommodating the circus and
displaying areas unrestricted to park users during the event.
g) Provision
of all show times to the City’s Rangers and Local Police to ensure adequate
surveillance during the event.
h) Completion
of consultation with all residents located within a 400 meter radius of Liddell
Park (to be undertaken not less than two weeks prior to performances),
informing them of all show times.
i) Payment
of applicable bond and park hire fees as per the City’s 2007/08 Fees &
Charges Schedule.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Ranger &
Safety Services
File Ref: P34/0357V01
File Name: CA Application To Keep More Than Two
Dogs Various Addresses.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Acting
Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Kelly Temperton
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider this application for an exemption to Council’s
Local Laws made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two
dogs.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999
stipulates:
“ A person shall not keep or
permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a)
2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under
that age; or
b) 6
dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the
premises are situated with a rural area or comprise a lot in a special rural
area having an area of 4 hectares or more;
unless the premises is
licensed as an approved kennel establishment or has been granted an exemption
pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 and have planning approval under
the Town Planning Scheme.”
Detail
The following application has been made under the Dog Act
1976 and is submitted for consideration.
|
Address of
Applicants
|
Description of
Dogs
|
|
26 Scenic Drive, Wanneroo
|
Female sterilised tri coloured Kelpie cross
Female sterilised black and white Kelpie cross
Female sterilised gold Labrador Retriever
Female sterilised red Staffordshire Bull Terrier
|
A Ranger has inspected this property to ensure means exist
on the premises at which the dogs will ordinarily be kept for effectively
confining within these premises.
|
Address of
Applicant
|
Property Zoning
|
Size of
Property
|
|
26 Scenic Drive, Wanneroo
|
Special Residential
|
0.4002 hectares
|
Consultation
It has been the practice where applications have been
received by the City to keep more than two dogs, that residents immediately
adjoining the applicant’s property in question have been consulted by letter to
ascertain if they have any objections.
On this occasion the following objection has been received:
26 Scenic Drive, Wanneroo
Number of residents consulted: 4
Number of objections received: 1
Comment
In considering this application for exemption, the
following two options are available:
a) Council
may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 subject to
conditions;
b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than
two dogs.
The applicant is
seeking permission from the City to keep more than two dogs at her parent’s
property at 26 Scenic Drive, Wanneroo whilst her house is being built in
Tapping. The applicant is currently renting a property in Tapping, which
unfortunately does not allow dogs. It is anticipated that the new house and
fencing to contain the dogs on the property will be completed mid June 2008.
It is proposed that any exemption, if granted, would lapse upon the completion
of the applicant’s residence and the dogs would be moved to their new abode.
The monitoring of this condition can be undertaken by the City’s Ranger
Services.
The applicant’s
additional two dogs are a female sterilised gold Labrador Retriever and a
female sterilised red Staffordshire Bull Terrier. A check of the City’s
records reveals that prior to this application being made no previous
complaints have been lodged with Ranger and Safety Services in relation to the
original dogs at the above-mentioned property.
It has been the practice that when an objection is received
relating to barking, a letter, information pack and a seven-day diary is sent
to the objector. If the seven-day diary is not completed and returned it is
assumed that the barking problem is not considered to be a significant
problem. In this instance, to date a completed seven-day diary has not been
returned. It should also be noted that this application may be varied or
revoked should further complaints be received which are considered reasonable.
The objecting neighbour will be invited to attend a deputation with the Mayor
and Councillors prior to the Council Meeting where they will be given the
opportunity to comment on this application.
The inspecting Ranger advises that the property is adequate
for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. The boundary fences and gates
stand at 1.5 metres high except the rear fence, which stands at 2.0 metres
high. Fences and gates are in compliance with regulations.
The dogs are kept in a large rear yard and sleep in the
house at night. The Ranger has recommended that an exemption to the City of
Wanneroo Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be
granted.
Statutory Compliance
This application for exemption to Council’s Local Laws made
under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 has been detailed in this report.
Strategic Implications
“2.4 Improve Community
Safety
2.4.4 Develop
and implement a range of activities that promote community safety and well
being.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. GRANTS
an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section
26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep four dogs at 26 Scenic Drive, Wanneroo,
subject to the specified conditions:
i)
If any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no
replacement is to be obtained;
ii)
Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum;
iii)
This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received
which are considered reasonable;
iv)
This exemption shall lapse upon the completion and habitation of the
applicant’s new abode currently under construction.
2. RESERVES
THE RIGHT to vary or revoke, at any future date, the exemption given to the
applicant should any relevant conditions be contravened.
3. ADVISES the adjoining neighbours of
this decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S22/0012V02
File Name: A Proposal to introduce Restricted and
Prohibited Fire Season throughoput the year .doc This line will not be printed
dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director
Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Team Leader Ranger Services
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To Consider fire safety issues within the
City of Wanneroo and the introduction of a restricted fire seasons throughout
the year.
Background
At its meeting held on 23 September 2003, Council resolved
to:
“REQUEST
Administration to prepare a report to the Policy and Local Law Committee on
amending the City of Wanneroo Health Local Law to require that a person shall
not set fire to, or cause to be set fire, any rubbish or refuse either in any
incinerator or on the ground without the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer within the residential area of the City of Wanneroo.”
Administration staff has investigated introducing local
laws under both the Health Act and the Local Government Act. However, it was
considered more appropriate to utilise the existing provision of the Bush Fires
Act 1954.
The proposal is to declare the City of Wanneroo into a
restricted fire season all year round except for the prohibited period; 1
December to 31 March the following year.
Detail
A need to address the issue of fire safety and nuisances,
to the environment as well as to human health and wellbeing, as a result of
open fires burning on properties within the City of Wanneroo has been an
ongoing issue. In particular, recent cases of peat bog fires as a result of
burning has highlighted the need to bring in legislation that is capable of
seeking penalties for those that carry out negligent or inappropriate burning.
This has not been possible during open fire season.
It is recommended that an application be made to the Fire
and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) to have the City’s restricted fire
season amended to adopt restricted fire burning at all times, excluding the
prohibited fire season. As such, restricted fire seasons will commence from 1
October to 30 November, then again from 1 April to 30 September, leaving the
prohibited season to remain from 1 December to 31 March.
The City provides numerous alternatives to disposing of
refuse, garden, and trade waste including disposal facilities at Tamala Park
and Badgerup Road. The practice of burning should be discouraged, as there are
a number of more suitable and sustainable alternatives. Notwithstanding, it is
recognised that at times there may not be other practicable options.
In such cases, the City may issue permits that set
conditions to ensure nuisances are not created and that fire safety measures
are adhered to. In addition to setting limitations on residential properties,
the commercial sector will also be required to adhere to the proposed
requirements. This will ensure that factors such as fire safety are managed
throughout the year, rather than the current practice of only during restricted
and prohibited burning times.
In the interests of environmental sustainability, and in
accordance with the City’s commitment to aim for a 20 per cent reduction in community
greenhouse emissions by the year 2012, burning practices in general should be
discouraged.
Consultation
The City has approached FESA in regard to this proposal and
FESA has given its support to the change in restricted burning dates. The City
of Wanneroo Volunteer Fire Brigades have also been consulted and are supportive
of this proposal.
Comment
Significant incidents, such as the recent peat bog fires,
that have occurred in recent times have highlighted the need for Council to
bring in legislation that will allow better management of all open fires.
Whilst education to the public will be the predominant use, adequate penalty
provisions will ensure compliance, which ultimately will benefit the health and
environmental wellbeing of the community.
Council’s approval is being sought to proceed with an
application to introduce a restricted fire season throughout the whole year.
In accordance with the requirements of the Bush Fires Act
1954, the Chief Executive Officer must make an application to FESA.
Statutory Compliance
Section 18 of the Bush Fires Act 1954 provides for the
Minister of Police and Emergency Services to amend restricted and prohibited
burning periods. This authority has been delegated to FESA.
Strategic Implications
Consideration of this report is consistent with the goal of
providing Healthy and Safe Communities under the City’s Strategic Plan.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Brochures and fire notices will need to reprinted however
this is a seasonal requirement and should not adversely affect the operational
budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES that the Chief Executive
Officer will make an application to FESA to have the restricted burning period
amended (in accordance with the Bush Fires Act 1954), to include the period 1
October to 30 November, and 1 April to 30 September, ensuring that controlled
burning is maintained on a year round basis.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02/0029V01
File Name: CA Regional Partnership Agreement with
the State Goverment Community Safety and Crime Prevention Graffiti .doc
This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director
Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Team Leader Safety Services
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider recent negotiations with the Office of Crime
Prevention (OCP) for the development of a Community Safety and Crime Prevention
Partnership Agreement based on a regional approach, partnering with the Cities
of Stirling and Bayswater.
Background
Council has considered entering into a Community Safety and
Crime Prevention Partnership Agreement with the State Government on a number of
occasions but as yet have declined to enter into an agreement on the basis of
inadequate funding and concerns of cost and responsibility shifting.
The major concern identified by the City was that the
agreements rely on local government to support, coordinate and administer the
local Community Safety and Crime Prevention Partnership, and to facilitate the
development and implementation of a local Community Safety and Crime Prevention
Plan. Whilst local government is identified as an equal partner to the
arrangements, other key stakeholders will associate the City as being the lead
agent responsible for action. This approach has the potential to create an
additional impost on the Local Governments by creating greater community
expectation in the area of community safety and crime prevention – outside of
core local government responsibilities.
In lieu of adopting an individual agreement with the OCP,
administration chose to progress discussions with the Cities of Joondalup,
Stirling and Bayswater, at an officer level, as each of these local governments
have expressed similar concerns. A regional based approach was thought to have
merit given that each of these local governments have similar issues and needs.
The officer group aimed to address some of the issues
associated with cost shifting, funding and changing scope of Local government
responsibilities in the partnership agreement, by developing a specific
proposal for an agreement in the Northern Region with the Office of Crime
Prevention. The proposed agreement was then discussed at the WALGA North Zone
meeting.
A number of draft regional partnership agreements were
prepared and subsequently discussed with and rejected by the OCP on the basis
that it did not meet the intended criteria that was considered appropriate.
The Regional group has continued to meet on a quarterly
basis sharing information and discussing strategies on common concerns relating
to crime prevention and local government issues.
Detail
After the initial meeting between OCP and the Regional
Officers Group, officers from the four local governments met to discuss a way
forward. Officers are still in agreement that the proposed regional
partnership model is a preferred approach and offers many benefits to the
Cities involved.
Following the discontinuation of negotiations in 2006, in
late 2007, the OCP approached each of the regional partners seeking to
re-establish negotiations to develop a suitable agreement.
During these subsequent discussions with the City of
Stirling, the Director of the OCP advised that they had amended their
partnership criteria and would accept a partnership agreement based on a
specific issue.
Officers from the City of Stirling identified graffiti
vandalism as a major concern in discussions with the OCP representatives, and
this was also reflected in the views of the officer group from the Cities of
Wanneroo and Bayswater. This problem has a significant effect on the feeling
of safety and the perceived fear or crime within the community. A supporting
consideration has been the activation of CCTV as a tool against graffiti and
anti-social behaviours.
The City of Stirling has progressed a draft graffiti
strategy outlining a program to more effectively address graffiti in the
community. Many of the initiatives could be developed in a partnership agreement
with funding by the Office of Crime Prevention. A copy of the strategy has now
been provided to each of the regional local government partners, including the
City of Wanneroo and the City has now been asked to consider an involvement in
partnership.
The City of Stirling has also informed administration that
they would be forwarding separate requests for funds to meet specific costs and
needs. If the City were to enter into a regional partnership with OCP,
administration would also be able to apply for a broader suite of crime
prevention funding options.
A draft Partnership Agreement has been provided by and is
attached for consideration (see Attachment 1). This agreement, prepared
by the OCP, recognises the regional partners including the Cities of Stirling,
Bayswater and Wanneroo. The OCP has also provided an individual agreement for
each local government, based on the same conditions contained within the
Regional document, should this be more suitable.
There are a number of key principles contained in the
agreement summarised below. These include:
· Local Government should not incur
additional costs or responsibilities as a consequence of this Agreement;
· The partnership and plan is based
solely on graffiti (and associated graffiti reduction strategies);
· The partnership is a regional plan
with specific needs included in addendums for each local Government if they
choose to participate; and
· Any non Local Government issues
identified in the plan will be forwarded to the responsible agency and the
Office of Crime Prevention for appropriate action.
A delegation from the City of Bayswater to the City of
Stirling have expressed a desire to participate in the regional agreement.
Officers from the City of Joondalup have indicated that at this stage it is
likely that Joondalup will sign a separate agreement negotiated with the State.
The City of Stirling have considered the proposed agreement
and resolved on 1 April 2008:
“That Council ENDORSES the proposal to enter into a
Community Safety and Crime Prevention Partnership Agreement with the State
Government based solely on graffiti.”
Consultation
Consultation has been conducted throughout the partnership
discussions with the Cities of Stirling, Bayswater and Joondalup.
Comment
The City of Wanneroo has been consistent in it’s position
on the State and Local Government Crime Prevention and Community Safety
Partnership Agreement proposal since the initiative was first rolled out in
2004. During this time the City has taken a watching brief of the process, and
continued to work at a regional level with the Regional Officers Group.
The key issues associated with the partnership agreement to
date have been associated with cost shifting and inequity in the planning
process.
The proposed single issue agreement on a regional basis
addresses in part these issues. It offers the opportunity for the City to
continue to work strategically with the Cities of Stirling and Bayswater, and
attract State funding for graffiti management, whereas in the past the City has
been disqualified, as it has not been a signatory to an agreement with the
State. Given the concessions that State Government has made in consideration of
a Regional Agreement, it is recommended that the City enter into a regional
partnership agreement with the OCP. It is also recommended that the City
progress discussions to try and secure additional funding in the areas of
reducing graffiti and antisocial behaviour and the use of CCTV similar to the
discussions the State have held with the City of Stirling.
The opportunity to access funding associated with the
Community Safety and Crime Prevention Partnership associated with graffiti is
linked with the outcomes of the Strategic Plan, which specifically identifies
graffiti as a priority area for the development and implementation of
initiatives to reduce the incidence and impact of graffiti in the community.
In addition to the funding tied specifically to the signing
of the agreement as listed in this report, the Office of Crime Prevention is
also responsible for the disbursal of a number of grant funds which the City
could apply for if it enters into a partnership. Although this funding is not
guaranteed, OCP funding rounds have in the past included specific funding
rounds for the purchase of equipment relating to the removal of graffiti, and
initiatives to improve community safety through urban design. As part of the
identification of initiatives to reduce the incidence of graffiti, there may be
an opportunity to access funds for CCTV, either for feasibility and design or
for the purchase of hardware associated with a project, which may be considered
as an urban design or special initiative.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Approximately 109 councils have signed a Community Safety and Crime Prevention Partnership
Agreement with the State Government and have either
completed or are in the process of developing a Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan. The Regional
agreement is unique and considered a most innovative approach in graffiti
management.
The partnership agreement includes a “Break Clause” and can
be terminated by either parties giving written notice to the other party.
This initiative compliments all of the participating Cities
existing graffiti management program and in the longer-term aims to kerb costs
associated with graffiti in the City.
The agreement is supported by the objectives of the City’s
Strategic Plan under Objective 2.4 Improve Community Safety:
“2.4.5 Develop and implement initiatives to reduce the incidence
and impact of graffiti in the community.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Each local Government will receive funding of $10,000 for
planning costs on signing a partnership agreement. A further $20,000 will be
paid for a priority identified in the plan and $1200 (pa) will be paid for
administration costs.
The City of Stirling has also sought consideration for
additional funding which would result in a total sum of $78,000 to be paid for
program initiatives for year one and $30,000 for year two.
There have been no further funding discussions with the
City of Wanneroo which indicate that there will be any further guaranteed
financial gain in participating in the agreement. Any of the Cities which
participate in the partnership agreements will also qualify for other funding
rounds released to local governments by the Office of Crime Prevention as they
become available.
The Office of Crime Prevention has advised that the
planning costs should not exceed the $10,000 provided. While the agreement
does not bind or commit the City to increase expenditure, the planning process
may draw out initiatives that are considered to be beneficial to addressing
problems associated with graffiti.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS
the proposal to enter into a Regional Community Safety and Crime Prevention
Partnership Agreement with the State Government and the Northern Region
partners, the Cities of Bayswater and Stirling.
2. AUTHORISES
the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to execute the Regional Community Safety
and Crime Prevention Partnership with the State Government and the Northern
Region partners, the Cities of Bayswater and Stirling.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Governance and
Strategy
Governance
File Ref: S07/0157
File Name: AA Annual Donation Challenge Brass
Banr.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy Cumbers
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider a request from an Elected Member to further
investigate the possibility of financially assisting the Challenge Brass Band
by way of an annual donation to cover hire costs for the use of Wanneroo
Recreation Centre.
Background
The Challenge Brass Band is a Wanneroo based not for profit
organisation who regularly play at various events across the metropolitan
area. They have previously received funding from the City of Wanneroo
Community Funding Program on three occasions. The Challenge Brass Band hire a
room at the Wanneroo Recreation Centre for band rehearsals once per week. In
February 2006 Council approved a waiver of fees in its entirety. The
Challenge Brass Band has also received funding via the City’s Community Funding
Program. At Council’s meeting on 11 March 2008, an amendment was endorsed as
follows:
“3. APPROVE
a waiver of fees in the sum of $1,811.40 for the Challenge Brass Band to hire
the Wanneroo Recreation Centre for band rehearsals from 17 January to 23
December 2008.
4. REQUEST
Administration to further investigate and report to Council the possibility of
the Challenge Brass Band receiving an annual donation equivalent to room hire
fees.”
Detail
The Donations, Sponsorships & Waiver of Fees and
Charges Policy states that continual waivers of fees are not supported. The
initial waiver of fees is available to provide short-term financial assistance
to City of Wanneroo organisations and groups to provide them with an
opportunity to establish themselves and seek a permanent source of financial
assistance to sustain their operations within the City.
Comment
Given that the request does not align with the City’s
Donations, Sponsorships & Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy Administration
is unable to recommend an annual donation.
However, should Council wish to approve an annual donation,
it is recommended that funds be listed in the 2008/2009 budget under the Community
Development directorate and that a report be provided to Council on an annual
basis to consider a donation for the Challenge Brass Band to use the facility
for the year, on the condition of financial statements being provided.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
This request does not align with the following criteria set
out in the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy:
·
Continuous waivers of fees will not be supported.
·
Only 50% waiver of fees (exclusive of the bond) will be
considered.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOT APPROVE the Challenge Brass
Band’s request for an annual donation to waive the fees associated with the
hire of the Wanneroo Recreation Centre for band rehearsals.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S17/0181V01
File Name: AA Community Funding Allocations March
2008 Round.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy Cumbers
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To endorse the recommendations from the Community Funding
Working Group for the current round of Community Development and Event
Sponsorship funding within the City of Wanneroo’s Community Funding Program.
Background
Council offers two rounds of Community Funding to the
community each financial year, in March and October. The funding provides an
opportunity for community organisations to apply for funding to support
community events, activities and projects.
The Community Funding Policy was amended in June 2007 to
omit compulsory information sessions for groups wishing to apply for funding.
Detail
The total number of applications received in this round was
14, with 8 applications being in the Community Development category and 6 in
the Event Sponsorship category. Copies of these applications have been placed
in the Elected Members Reading Room for further information.
The Community Funding Working Group met on Friday 11 April 2008
to assess all applications received and consider the recommendations made by
Administration on each application.
Recommendations made by the Working Group with regard to
the 14 applications received are summarised in Attachment 1.
Consultation
Groups were invited to attend a Question Session held by
the Grants Officer to increase the effectiveness of their applications and to
ensure that eligibility requirements were clearly understood.
Comment
The Grants Officer assessed all applications against the Community
Funding Policy and provided comments and recommendations for consideration to
the Community Funding Working Group. The Working Group have made
recommendations as detailed in this report.
All applications will be advised in writing of the outcome
of their application, upon Council’s endorsement.
The table below details the number of applications received
from each ward:
|
Ward
|
Number of Applications
|
|
North
|
7
|
|
Coastal
|
3
|
|
Central
|
3
|
|
South
|
1
|
|
Outside City of Wanneroo
|
0
|
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Community Funding Program is supportive of Council’s
strategic direction and supports outcomes:
“2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation
2.3 Improve the
capacity of local communities to support each other.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
|
Category
|
Amount requested
|
Amount recommended
|
|
Community Development
|
$19,182.90
|
$9,899.00
|
|
Event Sponsorship
|
$15,190.74
|
$10,940.60
|
|
TOTAL
|
$34,373.64
|
$20,839.60
|
All community funding grants are allocated from the Award
Community Grants Account, 717633-1205-316.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the recommendations of the
Community Funding Working Group meeting held on Friday 11 April 2008, as
indicated below:-
a) ENDORSES
funding of $867.00 via Community Development funding to the
Girrawheen/Koondoola Senior Citizens Club to support the cost of purchasing
computer printers and tutoring manuals, on the condition of providing proof of
incorporation and Certificate of Currency.
b) ENDORSES
funding of $2,000.00 via Community Development funding to Jobs West to support
the Urban Art Community Project(s).
c) DOES
NOT SUPPORT funding via Community Development funding to the Kingsway Football
& Sporting Club Inc for the 30th Anniversary of Our Club event.
d) ENDORSES
funding of $3,000.00 via Community Development funding to the Northern Suburbs
Stroke Support Group Inc to support the Respite Break for Carers and Recipients
project.
e) ENDORSES
funding of $2,032.00 via Community Development funding to the Quinns Rocks RSL
Sub Branch to support Remembrance Day 2008, on the condition of submission and
approval of an outstanding acquittal.
f) ENDORSES
funding of $1,200.00 via Community Development funding to St Cecilia’s Anglican
Church to support the Community Kitchens Project.
g) ENDORSES
funding of $800.00 via Community Development funding to St Stephen’s School,
Carramar to support the Year 3 and 4 Cycling Education Program.
h) DOES
NOT SUPPORT funding via Community Development funding to the Wanneroo Sporting
Clays to support the Shade Structure project.
i) REFERS
the Wanneroo Sporting Clays request for a Shade Structure to the City’s 2008/09
budget process for funding consideration.
j) DOES
NOT SUPPORT funding via Event Sponsorship funding to Atlantis Productions
Incorporated for The Adventures of Peter Pan event.
k) ENDORSES
funding of $685.60 via Event Sponsorship funding to the Country Women’s
Association – Yanchep Two Rocks Branch to support the Fashion Parade event.
l) ENDORSES
funding of $1,255.00 via Event Sponsorship funding to Wanneroo Senior High
School to support the “Curse of the Mummy” Musical Production.
m) ENDORSES
funding of $2,000.00 via Event Sponsorship funding to the Western Australian
Table Tennis Association (Inc) to support the 2008 Australian Veterans Table
Tennis Championships.
n) ENDORSES
funding of $5,000.00 via Event Sponsorship funding to the Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation
Association to support the Blessing of the Fleet event.
o) ENDORSES
funding of $2,000.00 via Event Sponsorship funding to the Yanchep Two Rocks RSL
Sub Branch to support Vietnam Veterans Day and Remembrance Day 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
Community Development Funding
|
NO
|
ORGANISATION
|
PROJECT
|
LOCATION
|
DATE
|
REQUESTED
|
RECOMMENDED
|
CONDITIONS
|
|
1
|
Girrawheen/Koondoola
Senior Citizens Club
|
Computer
Printers and Tutoring Manuals
|
6
Patrick Court, Girrawheen
|
ASAP
|
$
867.00
|
$867.00
|
Proof
of incorporation and certificate of currency
|
|
2
|
Jobs
West
|
Urban
Art Community Project(s)
|
Clarkson
Community High School, Girrawheen Senior High School, Wanneroo Senior High
School & Clarkson Youth Centre
|
Term 2 - 24 Dec 08
|
$
6,800.00
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
3
|
Kingsway
Football & Sporting Club Inc
|
30th
Anniversary of Our Club
|
Kingsway
Reserve and Club rooms.
|
29-Nov-08
|
$
3,000.00
|
$0.00
|
|
|
4
|
Northern
Suburbs Stroke Support Group Inc
|
Respite
Break for Carers and Recipients
|
Yanchep
Inn, Yanchep National Park
|
13-15 July 2008
|
$
3,000.00
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
5
|
Quinns
Rocks RSL Sub Branch
|
Remembrance
Day 2008
|
Quinns
Rocks Sports Club
|
11-Nov-08
|
$
2,032.00
|
$2,032.00
|
Acquittal
due in August 08
|
|
6
|
St
Cecilia's Anglican Church
|
Community
Kitchens Project
|
St
Cecilia's Anglican Church, Quinns Rocks
|
21 Jul 08 - 21 Jul 09
|
$
1,200.00
|
$1,200.00
|
|
|
7
|
St
Stephens School (Carramar)
|
Year
3 and 4 Cycling Education Program
|
St
Stephens School, Carramar
|
21 Oct - 18 Nov 08
|
$
1,680.00
|
$800.00
|
|
|
8
|
Wanneroo
Sporting Clays
|
Shade
Structure
|
Wanneroo
Shooting Complex, Pinjar
|
ASAP
|
$
603.90
|
$0.00
|
Refer
to budget for budget consideration
|
Event Sponsorship Funding
|
NO
|
ORGANISATION
|
EVENT
|
LOCATION
|
DATE
|
REQUESTED
|
RECOMMENDED
|
CONDITIONS
|
|
9
|
Atlantis
Productions Incorporated
|
The
Adventures of Peter Pan
|
The
ampitheatre, Yanchep Village
|
14 - 19 Dec 08
|
$ 4,250.14
|
$0.00
|
|
|
10
|
Country
Women's Association
|
Fashion
Parade
|
Phil
Renkin Centre, Two Rocks
|
03/09/2008
|
$ 685.60
|
$685.60
|
|
|
11
|
Wanneroo
Senior High School
|
"Curse
of the Mummy" Musical Production
|
Glynn
Watkins Theatre, Wanneroo
|
4 - 6 Aug 08
|
$ 1,255.00
|
$1,255.00
|
|
|
12
|
Western
Australian Table Tennis Association (Inc)
|
2008
Australian Veterans Table Tennis Championships
|
Kingsway
Sporting Complex
|
11-18 Oct 08
|
$ 2,000.00
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
13
|
Yanchep
Two Rocks Recreation Association
|
Blessing
of the Fleet
|
Two
Rocks Marina
|
Nov-08
|
$ 5,000.00
|
$5,000.00
|
|
|
14
|
Yanchep
Two Rocks RSL Sub Branch
|
Vietnam
Veterans Day and Remembrance Day 2008
|
Yanchep
National Park
|
18-Aug-08
11-Nov-08
|
$ 2,000.00
|
$2,000.00
|
|
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: S07/0057V03
File Name: AA Donation requests to be considered by
Council.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy Cumbers
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider a request for a donation in accordance with the
City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges
policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be
determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings,
coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
Detail
During this period, the City has received three requests
for sponsorship and one request for a waiver of fees to be considered by
Council. The requests are summarised on the following pages. The applications
have been included in an attachment to this report (Attachment 1).
Comment
|
Applicant 1 – Callisthenics Association of WA
|
|
Name of Individual/s
Reside in the City of Wanneroo
18 years of age or under
|
Tessa Alver, Courtney Dodd, Rachel Ellson, Stephanie
Highland, Michelle Highland, Indiana Samuels, Sienna Samuels, Simone Tagg and
Paige Whitfield-Samuels
Yes – Landsdale, Butler, Gnangara, Clarkson, Wanneroo
Yes
|
|
Event details
|
To participate in the Australian Callisthenics
Federation National Championships to be held in Perth from 17 to 20 July
2008.
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Not specified
|
|
Eligibility level
|
$200 per individual capped at $600 per team
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $600
($66.66 each) to support the participation of Tessa Alver, Courtney Dodd,
Rachel Ellson, Stephanie Highland, Michelle Highland, Indiana Samuels, Sienna
Samuels, Simone Tagg and Paige Whitfield-Samuels at the Australian Callisthenics
Federation National Championships to be held in Perth from 17 to 20 July
2008.
|
|
Applicant 2 – NRG Cheersports
|
|
Name of Individual/s
Reside in the City of Wanneroo
18 years of age or under
|
Allix Gordon, Jaime Gordon and Brittany Mcorman
Yes – Marangaroo & Madeley
Yes
|
|
Event details
|
To participate in the International Cheerleading
Championships “Spirit Down Under” to be held in Queensland from 27 to
30 June 2008.
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility level
|
$500 per individual capped at $600 per team
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $600
($200 each) to support the participation of Allix Gordon, Jaime Gordon and
Brittany Mcorman at the International Cheerleading Championships “Spirit
Down Under” to be held in Queensland from 27 to 30 June 2008.
|
|
Applicant 3 – Indoor Netball Australia
|
|
Name of Individual/s
Reside in the City of Wanneroo
18 years of age or under
|
Tracey Bloffwitch
Yes – Madeley
No
|
|
Event details
|
To participate in the 2008 Indoor Netball World Cup to
be held in Queensland from 1 to 7 June 2008.
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
No specified.
|
|
Eligibility level
|
$500 per individual capped at $600 per team
|
|
Comments
|
This request does not align with the policy in that
the individual is over the age of 18 years.
|
|
Recommendation
|
NOT APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of
$500 to support the participation of Tracey Bloffwitch at the 2008 Indoor
Netball World Cup to be held in Queensland from 1 to 7 June 2008.
|
|
Applicant 4 – Badminton WA
|
|
Request amount
|
$2,000.00
|
|
Description of request
|
Waiver of fees towards the hire of Kingsway Indoor
Stadium for the Badminton WA Open State Championships to be held on 10 and 11
May 2008.
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Yes
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Not for profit
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to the public
|
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values
and strategic direction
|
This request supports Objective 2.2 of Council’s
Strategic Plan being “Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing
through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.”
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
Entry fee is being charged. It has not been specified
how much.
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
Financial contribution of $4,550 specified, as well as
in kind contribution of 20 volunteers for 2 days.
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
PA announcements, invitations to VIP event, thank yous
at ceremony
|
|
Comments
|
The policy states that 75% or more of
participants/membership are required to be residents of the City of Wanneroo.
|
|
Recommendation
|
NOT APPROVE a waiver of fees to Badminton WA in the
sum of $2,000 to support the cost of court hire fees for the Badminton WA
Open State Championships to be held from 10 to 11 May 2008.
|
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations is aligned with the City’s
strategic direction as follows:
“2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation
2.2.1 Encourage,
support and provide a range of recreation and leisure opportunities, both
active and passive.”
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of
the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2007/2008 Governance Award Donations
|
$44,000
|
|
Amount expended to date
Under delegated authority:
By Council determination:
|
$14,022.58
$15,241.65 $29,264.23
|
|
Impact of approval of recommended delegated authority
applications:
Sponsorships:
Donations and Waiver of fees:
|
$1,200.00
$0.00
|
|
TOTAL
|
$1,200.00
|
|
Remaining funds
|
$13,587.77
|
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVE
a sponsorship request in the sum of $600 ($66.66 each) to support the
participation of Tessa Alver, Courtney Dodd, Rachel Ellson, Stephanie Highland,
Michelle Highland, Indiana Samuels, Sienna Samuels, Simone Tagg and Paige
Whitfield-Samuels at the Australian Callisthenics Federation National
Championships to be held in Perth from 17 to 20 July 2008.
2. APPROVE
a sponsorship request in the sum of $600 ($200 each) to support the
participation of Allix Gordon, Jaime Gordon and Brittany Mcorman at the
International Cheerleading Championships “Spirit Down Under” to be held
in Queensland from 27 to 30 June 2008.
3. NOT
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $500 to support the participation
of Tracey Bloffwitch at the 2008 Indoor Netball World Cup to be held in
Queensland from 1 to 7 June 2008.
4. NOT
APPROVE a waiver of fees to Badminton WA in the sum of $2,000 to support the
cost of court hire fees for the Badminton WA Open State Championships to be held
from 10 to 11 May 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S07/0057V03
File Name: AA Review of Youth Reward Recognition
Policy and Local Laws Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director,
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy Cumbers
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To endorse the changes arising from the review of the Youth
Reward & Recognition Policy.
Background
The Youth Reward & Recognition Policy was created and
endorsed by Council to acknowledge the achievements made by youth who reside
within the City of Wanneroo. The Student Citizenship Awards and Student
Scholarships are currently recognised within this policy.
Detail
Policies are developed by the Council and are aimed at
ensuring the City meets its strategic objectives through encouraging equity,
fairness, access to information and decision making and effective management of
community resources.
Administration has reviewed the policy detailed in the
table below and summarised the suggested changes. The policy has been included
in Attachment 1 showing all insertions or deletions.
|
Policy Reference
|
Action
|
New review date
|
|
Youth Reward & Recognition Policy
|
The addition of an Emergency Services Cadet
Participation Award and administrative changes to other awards.
|
April 2010
|
The addition of the Emergency Services Cadet Participation
Award to the Youth Reward & Recognition Policy acknowledges a graduating
cadet who has demonstrated outstanding commitment, enthusiasm and dedication
throughout their program. Administrative changes to the Youth Reward &
Recognition Policy include formatting amendments and the addition of the
Assessment Panels recommendations going to Council to be endorsed.
Consultation
As the variations to the policies in this report are of a
minor nature no community consultation was undertaken, however the City’s Youth
Development Officer was consulted in relation to amendments to the Youth Reward
& Recognition Policy.
Statutory Compliance
Section 2.7 of the Local Government Act defines the role of
Council and in particular under Section (2)(b) states:- “determines the
local government’s policies.”
Strategic Implications
The policies mentioned support the City’s strategic plan
2006 – 2021 objectives as follows:
“4.4.1 Monitor
and review business processes, structures and policies to improve performance
and service delivery.”
Policy Implications
Involves the confirmation, modification or rescission of various
Council policies.
Financial Implications
The financial implications to implement the Emergency
Services Cadet Participation Award will be covered in the Manage Community
Funding and Donations - General Expenditure budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council CONSIDER and ADOPT the reviewed
Youth Reward & Recognition Policy as detailed hereunder:
Youth Reward and Recognition Policy
Policy Owner: Governance
Distribution: All Elected Members
Implementation: May 2006 (GS02-05/06)
Scheduled Review: May 2008; April 2010
Objective
To provide for the recognition, reward and
celebration of young members in the community for their dedication and
commitment to their school, their local community and for their commitment to
paving the way for their future.
Statement
The City of Wanneroo annually recognises
individuals who have made a significant contribution to their school and local
community. This is recognised through the following three programs:
1. City of Wanneroo Student
Citizenship Award
Presented to a male and female student in Year 7
(or the final year of primary school) and Year 12 (or the final year of
secondary school) who has demonstrated an interest and participation in the
school and community affairs and has strived for personal development.
2. City of Wanneroo Student
Scholarship Awards
Presented to three individuals in Years 9, 10 or
11 residing in the City of Wanneroo as a retention incentive who have demonstrated
outstanding levels of academic achievement or citizenship and who are at a
financial or social disadvantage, which may limit their educational
opportunities.
3. City of Wanneroo Emergency Services
Cadet Participation Award
Presented to an individual graduating from the
Emergency Services Cadet Unit who have demonstrated outstanding commitment,
enthusiasm and dedication throughout the program.
Promotion of Recipients
Recipients of the Student Citizenship Awards,
Student Scholarships and Emergency Services Cadet Participation Award are
requested to participate in publicity and promotions. This can only be done
through appropriate permissions received by the parent/guardian of the
recipients. This permission will be included as a section on the relevant nomination
forms.
If permission is not granted for participation in
publicity and promotion, this will not impede a nomination in any way.
Program Details
1. Student Citizenship Award
Nomination Procedure
Nominations are
invited via advertising and promotion to all schools within the City of
Wanneroo commencing in the last week of July, continuing until the first week
of September. Schools are asked to nominate one male and one female student on
the official nomination form by the final closing date.
The nominated students
should be those that:
·
Are a resident of the City of Wanneroo,
·
Attending a City of Wanneroo school,
·
Have not received the same award previously,
·
Under the age of 18,
·
Have made a significant positive contribution to the local
community,
·
Possess leadership qualities,
·
Are an active member of the local community, and
·
Have a commitment to enhancing their local community.
If a school does not
have a deserving male and female student that they would like to nominate to
receive this prestigious award, they may choose to nominate two students of the
same sex, or just one deserving student.
Entitlements
Awards are presented
at the school’s graduation ceremony or end of year assembly (whichever is
applicable) and recipients of this award receive a framed certificate and an
engraved medallion. Recipients of this award are automatically nominated for
the City of Wanneroo Australia Day Youth Award.
2. Student Scholarship Award
Nomination Procedure
The Coordinator of the
Student Scholarship Program provides government secondary schools within the
City of Wanneroo with application forms and promotional material. Applications
are open from August each year for a period of 4 weeks. Students nominate
themselves using the official application form, for a Student Scholarship to
support them in their studies for the following year. These nominations are to
be received at the City of Wanneroo by the designated closing date. Teachers
will be encouraged to support students in the application process and promote
the opportunity to relevant students.
Nominations can be
received by students in Year 9, Year 10 or Year 11 for a scholarship to support
the costs of their studies in the following school year (ie Year 10, 11 and
12).
Eligibility Criteria
The criteria for the
Student Scholarship Award is as follows:
·
Students or their parent/guardian must be holders of a Centrelink
Concession Card (Health Care Card, Pension Concession Card, Veteran’s Benefit
Card),
·
Be a resident of the City of Wanneroo,
·
Under the age of 18,
·
Have not received the same award previously,
·
Students who are in receipt of any other scholarships over the
amount of $200.00 will not be eligible to receive the Student Scholarship from
the City of Wanneroo,
·
Students must be attending a government secondary school in the
year that the scholarship is awarded,
Going to a different
government secondary school in the City of Wanneroo does not prevent a student
from applying for a scholarship, however it must be stated which school the
student will be attending.
Selection Procedure
Applicants for the
City of Wanneroo Student Scholarship will be assessed by a the Student
Scholarship Assessment Panel according to the following:
·
Demonstrated financial need,
·
Demonstrated academic achievement,
·
Demonstrated commitment to enhancing the school environment.
·
Demonstrated active participation within the school,
Each school will have
one successful recipient per year group.
The Student
Scholarship assessment panel will comprise of:
·
Mayor, City of Wanneroo (or nominated representative),
·
Director, Community Development (or nominated representative),
·
Director, Governance and Strategy (or nominated representative),
·
Coordinator of the Student Scholarship program, and
·
Youth Services Officer.
The Student
Scholarship Assessment Panel’s recommendations will then be presented to
Council for endorsement. The Coordinator of the Student Scholarship Program
will notify the appropriate schools and applicants of the endorsement and
provide the necessary administration of the entitlements.
Entitlements
Recipients of the City
of Wanneroo Student Scholarship will receive a framed certificate and a
scholarship to the value of $400.00. This financial support will be held and
managed by the school the student will be attending the following year and used
for payments associated with fees, textbooks, excursions and other study
related requirements.
3. Emergency Services Cadet
Participation Award
Nomination Procedure
The Cadet Unit will
nominate one individual of the Emergency Services Cadet Unit graduating group
who they believe is deserving of receiving the award.
The nominated
individual should have:-
·
Demonstrated commitment
·
Demonstrated enthusiasm
·
Demonstrated dedication
·
Be a resident of the City of Wanneroo
There will be one
successful individual from the graduating group per year.
Entitlements
The recipient of the
City of Wanneroo Emergency Services Cadet Participation Award will receive a
framed certificate and engraved trophy at the end of year graduation ceremony.
Responsibility for Implementation
Director, Governance & Strategy
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Youth Reward and Recognition Policy
Policy
Owner: Governance
Distribution: All
Elected Members
Implementation: May
2006 (GS02-05/06)
Scheduled
Review: May 2008; April 2010
Replaces: Policy
2.4 School Scholarship Program Policy
Objective
To provide for the recognition, reward and celebration of
young members in the community for their dedication and commitment to their
school, their local community and for their commitment to paving the way for
their future.
Statement
The City of
Wanneroo annually recognises individuals who have made a significant
contribution to their school and local community and who are achieving well
academically. This is done recognised through the following two
three programs:
1. City of Wanneroo
Student Citizenship Award
Presented to a male and female student in Year 7 (or
the final year of primary school) and Year 12 (or the final year of secondary
school) who has demonstrated an interest and participation in the school and
community affairs and has strived for personal development.
2. City of Wanneroo
Student Scholarship Awards
Presented to three individuals in Years 9, 10 or 11 residing
in the City of Wanneroo as a retention incentive who have demonstrated
outstanding levels of academic achievement or citizenship and who are at
a financial or social disadvantage, which may limit their educational
opportunities.
3. City
of Wanneroo Emergency Services Cadet Participation Award
Presented to an individual graduating from the
Emergency Services Cadet Unit who have demonstrated outstanding commitment,
enthusiasm and dedication throughout the program.
General Program Guidelines
Eligibility
Criteria
Award
recipients for both programs must meet the following eligibility criteria:
·
A resident of the City of
Wanneroo,
·
Attending a City of
Wanneroo school
·
Under the age of 18, and
·
Has not received the same
award previously.
Promotion of Recipients
Recipients of
the Student Citizenship Awards, and Student Scholarships and
Emergency Services Cadet Participation Award are requested to participate
in publicity and promotions. This can only be done through appropriate permissions
received by the parent/guardian of the recipients. This permission will be
included as a section on the relevant nomination forms.
If permission is
not granted for participation in publicity and promotion, this will not impede
a nomination in any way.
Individual Programs Details
1. Student Citizenship Award
Nomination Procedure
Nominations are
invited via advertising and promotion to all schools within the City of
Wanneroo commencing in the last week of July, continuing until the first week
of September. Schools are asked to nominate one male and one female student on
the official nomination form by the final closing date.
The nominated
students should be those that:
·
Are a resident of the City of
Wanneroo,
·
Attending a City of Wanneroo
school,
·
Have not received the same
award previously,
·
Under the age of 18,
·
Have made a significant positive
contribution to the local community,
·
Possess leadership qualities,
·
Are an active member of the
local community, and
·
Have a commitment to enhancing
their local community.
If a school does
not have a deserving male and female student that they would like to nominate
to receive this prestigious award, they may choose to nominate two students of
the same sex, or just one deserving student.
Entitlements
Awards are
presented at the school’s graduation ceremony or end of year assembly
(whichever is applicable) and recipients of this award receive a framed
certificate and an
engraved
medallion. Recipients of this award are automatically nominated for the City of
Wanneroo Australia Day Youth Award.
2. Student Scholarship Award
Nomination Procedure
The
Coordinator of the Student Scholarship Program provides government secondary
schools within the City of Wanneroo with application forms and promotional
material. Applications are open from August each year for a period of 4
weeks. Nominations are invited
via advertising and promotion within the government secondary schools in the
City of Wanneroo. Students nominate
themselves using the official application form, for a Student Scholarship to
support them in their studies for the following year. These nominations are to
be received by at the school City of Wanneroo by
the designated closing date then forwarded on to the coordinator of the
program at the City of Wanneroo with appropriate comments and recommendations
from the staff of the school. Teachers will be encouraged to support
students in the application process and promote the opportunity to relevant
students.
Nominations can
be received by students in Year 9, Year 10 or Year 11 for a scholarship to
support the costs of their studies in the following school year (ie Year 10,
11 and 12). in the following categories:
·
Outstanding academic
achievement (TEE stream),
·
Outstanding academic
achievement (non TEE stream),
·
Encouragement.
Eligibility Criteria
As well as
the general criteria applicable to both programs, tThe criteria
for the Student Scholarship Award is has further eligibility
criteria that must also be met as follows:
·
Students or their
parent/guardian must be holders of a Centrelink Concession Card (Health Care
Card, Pension Concession Card, Veteran’s Benefit Card),
·
Be a resident of the City of
Wanneroo,
·
Under the age of 18,
·
Have not received the same
award previously,
·
Students who are in receipt of
any other scholarships over the amount of $200.00 will not be eligible to
receive the Student Scholarship from the City of Wanneroo,
·
Students must be attending a
government secondary school in the year that the scholarship is awarded,
Going to a
different government secondary school in the City of Wanneroo does not prevent
a student from applying for a scholarship, however it must be stated which
school the student will be attending.
Selection Procedure
Applicants for
the City of Wanneroo Student Scholarship will be assessed by a the
Student Scholarship Assessment Panel panel according to the
following:
Categories of
Academic Achievement in both TEE and non TEE -
·
Demonstrated financial need,
·
Demonstrated academic
achievement,
·
Demonstrated commitment to
enhancing the school environment.
Category of
Encouragement
·
Demonstrated financial
need,
·
Demonstrated active
participation within the school, and
·
Demonstrated commitment
to enhancing the school environment.
Each school
will have one successful recipient in each category. However if there are no
successful recipients in a particular category within a school, more than one
recipient may be successful in another category at the discretion of the
assessment panel.
Each school
will have one successful recipient per year group.
The Student
Scholarship assessment panel will comprise of:
·
Mayor, City of Wanneroo (or
nominated representative),
·
Director, Community Development
(or nominated representative),
·
Director, Governance and
Strategy (or nominated representative),
·
Coordinator of the Student
Scholarship program, and
·
Youth Services Officer.
The Student
Scholarship Assessment Panel’s recommendations will then be presented to
Council for endorsement. The Coordinator of the Student Scholarship Program
will notify the appropriate schools and applicants of the endorsement and
provide the necessary administration of the entitlements.
Entitlements
Recipients of the City of
Wanneroo Student Scholarship will receive a framed certificate and a
scholarship to the value of $400.00. This financial support will be held and
managed by the school the student will be attending the following year
and used for payments associated with fees, textbooks, excursions and other
study related requirements.
3. Emergency Services Cadet
Participation Award
Nomination Procedure
The Cadet
Unit will nominate one individual of the Emergency Services Cadet Unit
graduating group who they believe is deserving of receiving the award.
The nominated
individual should have:-
·
Demonstrated commitment
·
Demonstrated enthusiasm
·
Demonstrated dedication
·
Be a resident of the City of
Wanneroo
There will be
one successful individual from the graduating group per year.
Entitlements
The recipient
of the City of Wanneroo Emergency Services Cadet Participation Award will
receive a framed certificate and engraved trophy at the end of year graduation
ceremony.
Responsibility for Implementation
Director,
Governance & Strategy
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: S09/0249V01
Responsible Officer: Director
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 06 May 2008
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the repeal of the Standing Orders Local Law
2000 and it’s subsequent amendments and the adoption of new Standing Orders
Local Law 2008 as part of the 8 Year Local Law Review process.
Background
The Local Government Act 1995 (the Act), requires
that Council must, every eight years after adoption or review of any local law,
conduct a review of the local law to ensure that it still retains currency.
Further justification to review the Standing Orders Local Law is due to the
implementation of new legislation governing the conduct of council members -
the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 Section 4 which
refers:-
“4. Contravention
of certain local laws:-
(1) In
this regulation -
“local law as to conduct”
means a local law relating to conduct of people at council or committee
meetings.
(2) The
contravention of a local law as to conduct is a minor breach for the purposes
of section 5.105 (1) (b) if the Act.”
Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 9 October 2007
resolved to undertake a formal review of its Standing Orders Local Law applying
to the management and process of council meetings as part of the 8 Year Local
Law Review process. After an in depth consultation and submission process, the
Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 11 March 2008, resolved to proceed
with the repeal under Section 3.12 of the Act:-
“That Council:-
1. ADOPT
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the review of the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local
Law under Section 3.16 of the Local Government Act 1995 and the repeal and
replacement as detailed below:-
2. COMMENCE
the process under Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 to repeal and
replace the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law.”
Detail
There are two distinct processes to follow in undertaking
an 8 Year Local Law Review - the first being a review under Section 3.16 of the
Act and the second the implementation of the outcome of the review under
Section 3.12 of the Act. The City’s solicitors have reviewed the Standing
Orders Local Law under Section 3.16 of the Act as a separate process to that of
the 8 Year Local Law Review due to its significance to elected members.
The purpose of the Standing Orders Local
Law 2008 is to repeal the current Standing Orders Local Law 2000 as a result of
the 8 Year Local Law review process as well as to give effect to new
legislation in relation to the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations
2007.
The effect of the adoption of the new
Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is to permit better management and implementation
of Council’s decision-making process.
Consultation
The City engaged the services of Woodhouse Legal Solicitors
& Consultants to workshop the City’s Standing Orders Local Law with elected
members at the Council Forum meeting held on 14 August 2007. Information
provided to elected members prior to the 14 August 2007 Council Forum meeting
highlighted the various issues that needed to be considered and members were
requested to provide their comments to Council Administration. The first phase
of public advertising as required by the Act was then undertaken in late 2007
with the submission period closing December 2007. No submissions were
received.
A further workshop was held recently with elected members
on 19 February 2008, where the City’s solicitors provided members with further
clarification, specifically in terms of the “Dealing with Proponents” clause
included in the Standing Orders Local Law. As a result of this workshop the
draft Standing Orders Local Law was modified.
Comment
Changes in the draft Standing Orders Local Law 2008
include:-
a) Inconsistencies with the Act have been resolved by
referring to the relevant provisions of the Act and the Regulations in the
local law.
b) The language of the new draft Standing Orders is plain English
in order to be more representative of current best practice legislative
drafting.
c) The current local law unnecessarily repeats the
provisions of the Regulations in regard to the revoking of motions and does not
detail adequately the procedure for dealing with them or the effect of a
revocation on the implementation of earlier council decisions.
d) The inclusion of a “Dealing with Proponents” clause to
support recent concerns raised by the Crime and Corruption Commission.
e) The removal of Elected Members Question Time in line with
recommendations from the Department of Local Government and Regional
Development. The Department recognises that Elected Members are also members
of the public, however the Department is of the opinion that members have many
other opportunities to obtain information and that question time during Council
Meetings is provided for members of the public who do not have these
opportunities available to them.
Elected Members
may however wish to consider the re-instatement of this clause.
f) Other housekeeping matters.
The procedure for repealing and
replacement of the Standing Orders Local Law 2000 under Section 3.12 of the Act,
is detailed in the Statutory Compliance Section of this report.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.16 of
the Act requires the Council to carry out a formal review of its Local Laws
every 8 years.
Following the
review of the Local Laws any amendments will be processed in accordance with
Section 3.12 of the Act.
(1) In making a local law a local government
is to follow the procedure described in this section, in the sequence in which
it is described.
(2) At a council meeting the person presiding
is to give notice to the meeting of the purpose and effect of the proposed
local law in the prescribed manner.
(3) The local government is to —
(a) give Statewide public notice
stating that —
(i) the local government
proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarized in
the notice;
(ii) a copy of the
proposed local law may be inspected or obtained at any place specified in the
notice; and
(iii) submissions about
the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be
specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the
notice is given;
(b) as soon as the notice is given,
give a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister
and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is
proposed to be made, to that other Minister; and
(c) provide a copy of the proposed
local law, in accordance with the notice, to any person requesting it.
(3a) A notice under subsection (3) is also
to be published and exhibited as if it were a local public notice.
(4) After the last day for submissions, the
local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local
law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from
what was proposed.
*
Absolute majority required.
(5) After making the local law, the local
government is to publish it in the Gazette and give a copy of it to the
Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law
is proposed to be made, to that other Minister.
(6) After the
local law has been published in the Gazette the local government is to give
local public notice —
(a) stating the title of the local
law;
(b) summarizing the purpose and
effect of the local law (specifying the day on which it comes into operation);
and
(c) advising that copies of the local
law may be inspected or obtained from the local government’s office.
(7) The Minister may give directions to local
governments requiring them to provide to the Parliament copies of local laws
they have made and any explanatory or other material relating to them.
(8) In this section —
“making”
in relation to a local law, includes making a local law to amend the text of,
or repeal, a local law.”
Strategic Implications
The review
procedure supports the City’s Strategic Plan No. 4, Objective 4.7:-
“Governance:
Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The legal costs
associated with the review and repeal of the Standing Orders Local Law.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RESOLVES,
in accordance with Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act
1995 to repeal the Standing Orders Local Law 2000 and the adoption of a new Standing
Orders Local Law 2008, as detailed below, and
2. APPROVES the advertising of the Standing Orders Local Law
2008 (as per Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995) to seek public
comment.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
File Ref: S09/0131V01
Responsible Officer: Director
Governance and Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 06 May 2008
File Name: AA Legal Repsentation and Costs
Indemnification Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider repealing the “Legal Representation and Costs
Indemnification” Policy adopted on
6 March 2001 in favour of adopting the Department of Local Government and
Regional Development’s Model Policy on Legal Representation for Council Members
and Employees.
Background
In July 2007, the Department of Local Government and
Regional Development (the Department) undertook a probity audit of the City’s
statutory compliance processes and provided a number of recommendations to
improve those processes.
One of the recommendations was a requirement to review the
City’s Legal Representation and Indemnification Policy in line with the
Department’s Guidelines No. 14, “Legal Representation for Council Members and
Employees”.
Detail
The Department’s guideline was developed to provide advice
to local governments in making decisions or preparing a policy based on what is
considered to be good practice with regard to the delegation of approval to
fund financial assistance for legal representation. Because the issue of legal
financial assistance can become a sensitive or contentious matter it is
recommended that Council not delegate the power to approve the funding, except
where a delay may cause detriment to the legal rights of the elected member or
employees.
The Department Guidelines reinforce the
Local Government Act 1995 in that:-
“Section 9.56 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) provides
protection from actions of tort for anything a council member or employee has,
in good faith, done in the performance or purported performance of a function
under the Act or under any other written law. However, the legislation does not
preclude people taking action against individual council members or employees
if they believe that the council member or employee has not acted in good
faith.
Section 3.1 of the Act provides that the general
function of a local government is to provide for the good government of persons
in its district. Section 6.7(2) provides that money held in the municipal fund
may be applied towards the performance of the functions and the exercise of the
powers conferred on the local government by the Act or any other written law.
Under these provisions a council can expend funds to provide legal
representation for council members and employees as long as it believes that
the expenditure falls within the scope of the local government’s function.”
Consultation
Consideration has been given to the Department of Local Government
and Regional Developments Guidelines No. 14 as required through the Compliance
Probity Audit and the recommendations from the City’s internal auditors,
Stamfords, on the Annual Compliance Audit Return.
Comment
It is important to note that local governments are often
open to criticism by members of the community, which may or may not lead to
accusations of misconduct or corruption. Investigations into these matters
generally follow and it would be Council’s responsibility to determine whether
legal cost should be indemnified to the council member or employee and under
what circumstances.
A policy to support the decision making process of the
Council in this matter is imperative. The Department has identified that the
City’s current policy (Attachment 1) is lacking in some of its
directions. To ensure all issues are covered, Administration recommends that
the Department’s Model Policy provided in its Guidelines No.14 be adopted in
its entirety.
Administration has reviewed a number of policies adopted by
other local governments and its own current policy against the Department’s
Model Policy and can find no impediment to recommending the adoption of the
Model Policy to Council.
The following differences were identified between the
Council’s policy and the Department’s guidelines:
·
The guidelines
state that a delegation to the Chief Executive Officer is warranted in cases
where a delay in the approval of an application will be detrimental to the
legal rights of the applicant. It also suggests that an application approved
under these circumstances is to be submitted to the next ordinary meeting of
Council to allow the opportunity to revoke or vary an approval.
·
Council’s policy and delegation indicate that the CEO can
authorise the provision of legal services in urgent circumstances (if required
before an application can be presented to Council) up to the value of $5,000.
The Department’s Model Policy suggests that the authorisation be set at $10
000.
·
It is important to recognise that Council has to be provided with
the opportunity to revoke or vary any approval for payment of legal expenses
incurred by a council member or employee. Whilst Council’s policy does
indicate that Council will consider the application for legal funding at some
point, the policy does not indicate when this will occur. The Department’s
Model Policy suggests that this be done at the next Ordinary Council meeting.
·
The guidelines define the form of payment that can be made by the
local government for legal assistance. In the case of an elected member, the
Act does not provide for a direct payment of costs or expenses to a member.
There is only provision for direct payment of meeting fees and allowances to
members.
Council’s policy does not define
or describe the forms of payment that can be made to an elected member or
employee. It is suggested that to clarify the matter the two forms of payment
are described in Council’s policy.
·
The guidelines indicate that the following details should be
provided in the written application for payment.
-
The matter for which legal representation is sought;
-
how the matter relates to the functions of the council member or
employee making the application;
-
the lawyer (or law firm) who is to be asked to provide the legal
representation;
-
the nature of legal representation to be sought (such as advice,
representation in court, preparation of a document etc);
-
an estimation of the legal costs;
-
a statement as to why it is in the interests of the City for payment to
be made.
This level of detail is not
specified in Council’s policy, therefore there is a risk that the information
provided might not be sufficient to properly assess the application and make an
informed decision on the matter.
Statutory Compliance
Compliance to the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
Policies are reviewed and developed regularly to meet the
changing needs of our customers and to ensure decisions are undertaken in an
open and accountable manner. This policy review is in keeping with the City’s
Strategic Plan No. “4, Objective 4.7:-
“4.7 Maintain a high standard of governance
and accountability”.
Policy Implications
Repeal the City’s existing Legal Representation and Costs
Indemnification Policy and adopt the Department’s Model Policy in line with the
Department of Local Government and Regional Developments Guidelines No. 14 to
support an effective decision making process.
Financial Implications
Reimbursement of legal expenses is in line with the
Council’s approved policy and the annual budget allocation for legal expenses.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council REPEAL the City’s existing Legal
Representation and Costs Indemnification Policy adopted on 06 March 2001 and
ADOPT the Department of Local Government and Regional Development’s Model
Policy on Legal Representation for Council Members and Employees as detailed
below:-
Legal Representation for Council Members and
Employees
Key Terms
·
approved lawyer is to be –
(a) a ‘certified practitioner’ under the Legal
Practice Act 2003;
(b) from a law firm on the City of Wanneroo panel
of legal service providers, if relevant, unless the council considers that this
is not appropriate –
for example where there is or may be a conflict of interest
or insufficient expertise; and
(c) approved in writing by the council or the CEO
under delegated authority.
·
council member or employee means a current or former commissioner, council member,
non-elected member of a council committee or employee of the City of Wanneroo.
·
legal proceedings may be civil, criminal or investigative.
·
legal representation is the provision of legal services, to or on behalf of a
council member or employee, by an approved lawyer that are in respect of –
(a) a matter or matters arising from the performance
of the functions of the council member or employee; and
(b) legal proceedings involving the council member or
employee that have been, or may be, commenced.
·
legal representation costs are the costs, including fees and disbursements, properly
incurred in providing legal representation.
·
legal services includes advice, representation or documentation that is
provided by an approved lawyer.
·
payment by
the City of Wanneroo of legal representation costs may be either by –
(a) a direct payment to the approved lawyer (or the
relevant firm); or
(b) a reimbursement to the council member or
employee.
1. Payment
Criteria
There are four major
criteria for determining whether the City of Wanneroo will pay the legal
representation costs of a council member or employee. These are:-
(a) the legal representation costs must relate to a
matter that arises from the performance, by the council member or employee, of
his or her functions;
(b) the legal representation cost must be in respect
of legal proceedings that have been, or may be commenced;
(c) in performing his or her functions, to which the
legal representation relates, the council member or employee must have acted in
good faith, and must not have acted unlawfully or in a way that constitutes
improper conduct; and
(d) the legal representation costs do not relate to a
matter that is of a personal or private nature.
2. Examples of
legal representation costs that may be approved
2.1 If the criteria
in clause 1 of this policy are satisfied, the City of Wanneroo may approve the
payment of legal representation costs –
(a) where proceedings are brought against a council
member or employee in connection with his or her functions – for example, an
action for defamation or negligence arising out of a decision made or action
taken by the council member or employee; or
(b) to enable proceedings to be commenced and/or
maintained by a council member or employee to permit him or her to carry out
his or her functions - for example where a council member or employee seeks to
take action to obtain a restraining order against a person using threatening
behaviour to the council member or employee; or
(c) where exceptional circumstances are involved –
for example, where a person or organization is lessening the confidence of the
community in the local government by publicly making adverse personal comments
about council members or employees.
2.2 The City of
Wanneroo will not approve, unless under exceptional circumstances, the payment
of legal representation costs for a defamation action, or a negligence action,
instituted by a council member or employee.
3. Application for
payment
3.1 A council member
or employee who seeks assistance under this policy is to make an
application(s), in writing, to the council or the CEO.
3.2 The written
application for payment of legal representation costs is to give details of:
(i) the matter for which legal representation is
sought;
(ii) how that matter relates to the functions of the
council member or employee making the application;
(iii) the lawyer (or law firm) who is to be asked to
provide the legal representation;
(iv) the nature of legal representation to be sought
(such as advice, representation in court, preparation of a document etc);
(v) an estimated cost of the legal representation;
and
(vi) why it is in the interests of the City of
Wanneroo.
for payment to be made.
3.3 The application
is to contain a declaration by the applicant that he or she has acted in good
faith, and has not acted unlawfully or in a way that constitutes improper
conduct in relation to the matter to which the application relates.
3.4 As far as
possible the application is to be made before commencement of the legal
representation to which the application relates.
3.5 The application
is to be accompanied by a signed written statement by the applicant that
he/she:-
(a) has read, and understands, the terms of this
Policy;
(b) acknowledges that any approval of legal
representation costs is conditional on the repayment provisions of clause 7 and
any other conditions to which the approval is subject; and
(c) undertakes to repay to the City of Wanneroo any
legal representation costs in accordance with the provisions of clause 7.
3.6 In relation to
clause 3.5(c), when a person is to be in receipt of such monies the person
should sign a document which requires repayment of that money to the local
government as may be required by the local government and the terms of the
Policy.
3.7 An application
is also to be accompanied by a report prepared by the CEO or where the CEO is
the applicant by an appropriate employee.
4. Legal
representation costs – Limit
4.1 The council in
approving an application in accordance with this policy shall set a limit on
the costs to be paid based on the estimated costs in the application.
4.2 A council member
or employee may make a further application to the council in respect of the
same matter.
5. Council’s
powers
5.1 The council may
–
(a) refuse;
(b) grant; or
(c) grant subject to conditions,
an application for payment of legal representation costs.
5.2 Conditions under
clause 5.1 may include, but are not restricted to, a financial limit and/or a
requirement to enter into a formal agreement, including a security agreement,
relating to the payment, and repayment, of legal representation costs.
5.3 In
assessing an application, the council may have regard to any insurance benefits
that may be available to the applicant under the City of Wanneroo’s council
members or employees insurance policy or its equivalent.
5.4
The council may at any time revoke or vary an approval, or any conditions
of approval, for the payment of legal representation costs.
5.5
The council may, subject to clause 5.6, determine that a council member
or employee whose application for legal representation costs has been approved
has, in respect of the matter for which legal representation costs were
approved –
(a) not
acted in good faith, or has acted unlawfully or in a way that constitutes
improper conduct; or
(b) given false
or misleading information in respect of the application.
5.6 A
determination under clause 5.5 may be made by the council only on the basis of,
and consistent with, the findings of a court, tribunal or inquiry.
5.7 Where
the council makes a determination under clause 5.5, the legal representation
costs paid by the City of Wanneroo are to be repaid by the council member or
employee in accordance with clause 7.
6. Delegation to Chief Executive Officer
6.1 In cases where a
delay in the approval of an application will be detrimental to the legal rights
of the applicant, the CEO may exercise, on behalf of the council, any of the
powers of the council under clause 5.1 and 5.2, to a maximum of $10,000 in
respect of each application.
6.2 An application
approved by the CEO under clause 6.1, is to be submitted to the next ordinary
meeting of the council. Council may exercise any of its powers under this
Policy, including its powers under clause 5.4.
7.
Repayment of legal representation costs
7.1 A council member
or employee whose legal representation costs have been paid by the City of
Wanneroo is to repay the City of Wanneroo:-
(a) all or part of those costs in accordance with a
determination by the Council under clause 5.7;
(b) as much of those costs as are available to be
paid by way of set-off – where the council member or employee receives monies
paid for costs, damages, or settlement, in respect of the matter for which the
City of Wanneroo paid the legal representation costs.
7.2 The City of
Wanneroo may take action in a court of competent jurisdiction to recover any
monies due to it under this Policy.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 1 of 3
Policy Owner: Governance
Distribution: All Elected Members and
All Employees
Implementation: 06 March 2001
Reviewed: 23 September 2003 –
CE03-09/03, 20 October 2006
Scheduled Review: October 2007
Objective
To provide a framework for determining whether financial
assistance may be provided to officers or members of council in defending legal
actions.
Statement
1.0 Introduction
This policy is designed to protect the interests of council
members and employees (including past members and former employees) where they
become involved in civil legal proceedings because of their official
functions. In most situations the local government may assist the individual
in meeting reasonable expenses and any liabilities incurred in relation to
those proceedings.
In each case it will be necessary to determine whether
assistance with legal costs and other liabilities is justified for the good
government of the district. This policy applies in that respect.
2.0 General Principles
2.1 The
local government may provide financial assistance to members and employees in
connection with the performance of their duties provided that the member or
employee has acted reasonably and has not acted illegally, dishonestly, against
the interests of the local government or otherwise in bad faith.
2.2 The
local government may provide such assistance in the following types of legal
proceedings:
(a) proceedings
brought by members and employees to enable them to carry out their local
government functions (eg where a member or employee seeks a restraining order
against a person using threatening behaviour);
(b) proceedings
brought against members or employees in relation to a decision of Council or an
employee which aggrieves another person (eg refusing a development application)
or where the conduct of a member or employee in carrying out his or her
functions is considered detrimental to the person (eg defending defamation
actions); and
ATTACHMENT 1
Page
2 of 3
(c) statutory
or other inquiries where representation of members or employees is justified.
2.3 The
local government will not support any defamation actions seeking the payment of
damages for individual members or employees in regard to comments or criticisms
leveled at their conduct in their respective roles, or anything that relates to
a matter that is of a personal or private nature. Members or employees are not
precluded, however, from taking their own private action. Further, the local
government may seek its own advice on any aspect relating to such comments and
criticisms of relevance to it.
2.4 The
legal services under this policy will usually be provided by the local
government's solicitors. Where this is not appropriate for practical reasons
or because of a conflict of interest then the service may be provided by other
solicitors approved by the local government.
3.0 Applications for Financial
Assistance
3.1 Subject
to item 3.5, decisions as to financial assistance under this policy are to be
made by the Council.
3.2 A
member or employee requesting financial support for legal services under this
policy is to make an application in writing, where possible in advance, to the
Council providing full details of the circumstances of the matter and the legal
services required.
3.3 An
application to the Council is to be accompanied by an assessment of the
request, including an estimation of costs, and with a recommendation which has
been prepared by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
3.4 A
member or employee requesting financial support for legal services, or any
other person who might have a financial interest in the matter, should take
care to ensure compliance with the financial interest provisions of the Local
Government Act 1995.
3.5 Where
there is a need for the provision of urgent legal services before an
application can be considered by Council, the CEO may give an authorisation to
the value of $5000 in accordance with section 5.42 of the Local Government Act
1995.
3.6 Where
it is the CEO who is seeking urgent financial support for legal services the
Council shall deal with the application.
4.0 Assistance to be
Retrospective
Financial assistance will be paid retrospectively at the
conclusion of the legal action for which financial assistance was sought except
in cases of serious financial hardship as determined by council.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 3 of 3
5.0 Repayment of Assistance
5.1 Any
amount recovered by a member or employee in proceedings, whether for costs or
damages, will be off set against any moneys paid or payable by the local
government.
5.2 Assistance
will be withdrawn where an adverse finding has been determined by a civil court
or Inquiry established under the auspices of the WA Parliamentary Ombudsman,
the Local Government Act or any other Inquiry established by decision of
Parliament. Assistance will also be withdrawn where information from the
person is shown to have been false or misleading.
5.3 Where
assistance is so withdrawn, the person who obtained financial support is to
repay any moneys already provided. The local government may take action to
recover any such moneys in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Responsibility for Implementation
Governance
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Corporate
Performance
File Ref: S41/0022V01
Responsible Officer: Director
Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Vicki Barry
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachments: 1
File Name: BA Triannual Corporate Performance
Report 1 November 2007 29 February 2008.doc This line will not be printed
dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the Triannual Corporate Performance Report
(TCPR) 1 November 2007 - 29 February 2008.
Background
The City
purchased the core module of interplan® in August 2005 to provide an integrated
corporate planning and performance reporting tool for the organisation.
Following the development of the Strategic Plan 2006-2021, a corporate
performance reporting framework was developed as follows:
The TCPR is produced as an executive report
at the end of each 4-month reporting period and is intended to provide Council
with a regular progress report on key strategic activities within the City.
The first of these reports was presented to Council in November 2007 for the
period July to October 2007, and this is the second for the 2007/08 financial
year.
Detail
This second TCPR has been produced for the
period 1 November 2007 to 29 February 2008 (refer Attachment 1). A range of
projects where major milestones have been achieved are highlighted at the front
of the report, followed by a progress report on key strategic initiatives and
major capital works projects underway across the City.
A summary of the organisational highlights
achieved for this period include:
1.
Energy Action Plan
Endorsed and subsequent actions are now being implemented.
2.
Wangara Materials Recovery Facility
Operational since January 2008 and is now processing all
recyclables form Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and Swan.
3.
Innovative Playspace in Rotary Park
Under construction and due for completion in July 2008.
4.
Demonstration Home to Promote
Sustainability in Design
After many months of negotiation, the joint venture with
Cedar Woods, to develop and construct a demonstration home to showcase
sustainability in residential construction, has been finalised with an official
launch scheduled in March 2008.
5.
Butler Community Centre and Changerooms
Construction now complete and facility being utilised by
the community.
6.
Redevelopment of Aquamotion
Works well under way. Council has considered remedial
action and funding requests required for completion.
7.
Gumblossom Reserve Changerooms
Construction commenced January 2008.
8.
Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre
Construction for the Centre is under way with the
foundation in place.
9.
Ocean Drive Redevelopment Quinns
Work now in progress
10.
Extension to Ocean Reef Road Going Ahead
Clearing permit approved. Project ready for tendering
Comment
The TCPR reveals that a number of corporate
and capital projects are behind schedule due mainly to delays in contract
development and the tendering process, contract/partnership management issues,
environmental issues, staff shortages and the inability to recruit some
positions; the latter, a reflection of the current labour market and skills
shortages.
Statutory Compliance
The TCPR supports the achievement of the City’s ‘Plan for
the Future’ - Strategic Plan 2006 -2021 - as required under the Local
Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
The TCPR reports against the achievement of the City’s key
strategic actions and the progress toward the achievement of the Strategic Plan
2006 -2021.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the Triannual Corporate
Performance Report for
1 November 2007 to 29 February 2008 as detailed in Attachment 1.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be
printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 1 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 2 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 3 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 4 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 5 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 6 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 7 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 8 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 9 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 10 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 11 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 12 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 13 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 14 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 15 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 16 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 17 of 18
|
|
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 18 of 18
|
|
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Chief Executive
Office
General
File Ref: S24/0023v01
File Name: A Appointment of Acting Chief Executive
Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Charles Johnson
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To consider the appointment of Acting Chief Executive
Officers from Friday 23 May 2008 to Sunday 1 June 2008 (inclusive) and from
Monday 16 June to Sunday 29 June (inclusive).
Background
The Chief Executive Officer will be attending the Local
Government Managers National Conference in Queensland from 23 May to 1 June
2008 and will be taking annual leave from 16 June to 29 June 2008.
Detail
Under the Local Government Act (1995), Council is required
to appoint both the Chief Executive Officer and any person acting in this
position. The Chief Executive Officer requests approval to appoint the
Director, Infrastructure, Mr Dennis Blair, as Acting Chief Executive Officer
from Friday 23 May 2008 – Sunday 1 June 2008 (inclusive of a weekend) and
approval to appoint the Director, Governance and Strategy, Mrs Karen Caple, as
Acting Chief Executive Officer from Monday 16 June 2008 – Sunday 29 June 2008
(inclusive of a weekend).
It is not intended to backfill the positions of Director,
Infrastructure during the period 23 May 2008 to 1 June 2008 and Director,
Governance and Strategy during the period 16 June to 29 June, whilst the
Directors are undertaking the role of Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Comment
Nil.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act (1995) s5.3.6 requires the Council
appoint the Chief Executive Officer. The Department of Local Government has
confirmed that this also extends to the appointment of Acting Chief Executive
Officer.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
1. That
Council APPOINT the Director, Infrastructure, Mr Dennis Blair, to the position of
Acting Chief Executive Officer for the period Friday 23 May 2008 – Sunday 1
June 2008 (inclusive).
2. That
Council APPOINT the Director, Governance and Strategy, Mrs Karen Caple, to the
position of Acting Chief Executive Officer for the period Monday 16 June 2008 –
Sunday 29 June 2008 (inclusive).
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057V03
File Name: A Donation requests considered under the
delegated authority of the Chief Executive Officer.doc This line will not be
printed
Responsible Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy Cumbers
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT
delete
Issue
To note donation applications considered and determined by
the Chief Executive Officer during March 2008, in accordance with the
provisions of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges
policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges
policy delegates the consideration and determination of requests for donations,
sponsorships and the waiver of fees and charges under the value of $500 to the
Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
During March 2008, the City received the following requests
to be considered under the delegated authority of the Chief Executive Officer:
1. Four (4) requests for sponsorship
2. Nil (0) requests for a donation
3. One (1) request for a waiver of fees
Comment
In accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in
the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy,
determinations were made as listed in the recommendations to this report.
Applications and assessments of each request against the
policy is available in the Elected Members Reading Room for further
information.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
This report aligns with the provisions and delegations of
the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy.
Financial Implications
The financial implications of this round of requests has
resulted in expenditure in the Award Governance Donations Account
(717633-1207-316) of:-
·
$996.33 from 2007/2008 budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of
requests received by the City in March 2008 for donations, sponsorships and waiver
of fees and charges, which are as follows:-
|
Organisation
|
Event/Activity
|
Recommendation
|
Reason
|
|
1. AIESEC
|
2008 State Championships to be held at Bickley
Recreation Camp from 23 to 25 April 2008.
|
NOT
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $75 to support Maria
Themistocleous in her participation at the 2008 State Championships to be
held at Bickley Recreation Camp from 23 to 25 April 2008.
|
The
policy states applicants must be 18 years of age or under; the applicant is
22 years of age.
|
|
2. Cycling WA
|
Australian Junior Track Cycling Championships to be
held in Sydney from 27 to 30 March 2008.
|
APPROVE a
sponsorship request in the sum of $400 (ie $200 each) to Mitch Benson and
Luke Zaccaria for their participation at the Australian Junior Track Cycling
Championships to be held in Sydney from 27 to 30 March 2008.
|
This
request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
3. St George’s Cathedral Choir
|
“Our Other Anzac Day” event to be held in France
from 16 to 29 April 2008.
|
APPROVE a
sponsorship request in the sum of $500 to Stefan Deselys-Claite for his
participation at the “Our Other Anzac Day” event to be held in France from 16
to 29 April 2008.
|
This
request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
4. Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club
|
Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club in their
participation of training and competition to be held in Yanchep from March to
September 2008.
|
NOT
APPROVE a sponsorship request for 131 members of Yanchep Districts Junior
Football Club in their participation of training and competition to be held
in Yanchep from March to September 2008.
|
The
policy states that training for events will not be supported. This request
is for the normal football season rather than for a specific
event/championship. Participants must also be residents of the City of
Wanneroo, 17 members reside outside the City.
|
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S21/0015v01
Responsible Officer: Nil
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
File Name: ACr Bret Treby Cr Goodenough.doc This
line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the preparation of an Amendment to the District
Planning Scheme (DPS) 2 in response to the Prostitution Amendment Bill 2007.
Background
The Prostitution Amendment Bill 2007 gives effect to the
Government’s policy commitment to reform prostitution laws. To reflect this
change, the Prostitution Act will be renamed the Prostitution Reform Act.
The purpose of the Bill is to provide a framework for
addressing the regulation of prostitution in a manner that is conducive to
public health, protects sex workers from exploitation and protects children
from being involved in or exposed to prostitution.
The Bill has progressed through both Houses of State
Parliament and Royal Assent was given on 14/04/08 as Act No. 13 of 2008.
Different sections of the Act come into operation on Royal Assent and
Proclamation.
Detail
Division 8 of the Act sets out in section 21 the process
for planning and development controls to be exercised in relation to sexual
service businesses.
Section 21Y of the Bill enables local governments to grant
planning approval in relation to sexual service businesses even though their
present schemes do not provide for this use. Applications are required to be
treated as if the purpose is a use that is not permitted unless Council has
exercised its discretion by granting planning approval. In exercising its
discretion it must, in addition to other relevant considerations, have regard
to whether the development is likely to cause a nuisance to members of the
public using the area in which the land is situated and is incompatible with
the existing character or use of the area in which the land is situated.
This interim provision ensures that development
applications can be approved prior to local planning schemes being amended.
Once appropriate amendments have been made to local planning schemes, under the
guidance of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), the provision
will cease to have effect.
Comment
It is recommended that the City amend DPS2 to include a
specific definition of Adult Entertainment to address applications proposing
sexual services for commercial gain. This will allow for easy interpretation
of what is considered to constitute an Adult Entertainment facility. The
suggested definition would need to be consistent with the proposed amendment to
the Prostitution Act 2000.
It is noted that the legislation allows a small owner
operated business (two or less sex workers) to operate without specific
planning approval where each of those sex workers has full control over their
earnings. It is considered, however, that the generation of traffic and social
implications associated with this type of business in any zone within the City
is not appropriate.
The proposed Adult Entertainment sexual services business
would be considered as “X” uses in all zones and therefore not permitted.
Statutory Compliance
The amendment will provide a mechanism in the City’s Town
Planning Scheme to address the proposed legislation and give guidance to
consider such applications.
Strategic Implications
The proposed amendment will provide guidance in promoting
community wellbeing and sense of belonging of the whole community.
Financial Implications
The City will bear the cost of any advertising of the
amendment.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council REQUIRES that Administration prepare
for Council consideration a draft Amendment to the City of Wanneroo District
Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
1. Define
Adult Entertainment so as to address applications proposing sexual service
businesses for commercial gain.
2. Not
permit any Adult Entertainment facilities within any zone within the City of
Wanneroo.
Administration Comment:
The previous proposed legislation, which was introduced in
2003 (however was not continued by the State Government in 2005), intended to
specify appropriate locations for such facilities as being in:
·
Industrial areas;
·
Premises not within 300 metres of an education centre, a place of
public worship or land used for community use; and
·
Not within residential areas
Whilst this is not reflected within the current legislation
this is considered a likely approach by the WAPC to the consideration of any
Scheme Amendment.
It would seem likely that the WAPC could give consideration
to changing Council’s Amendment to at least allow Adult Entertainment in
Industrial zones. Council needs to be aware that once the Amendment is
initiated the Minister can require it to be completed with any changes that are
considered appropriate.
It is anticipated that a draft Amendment would be prepared
by Council’s legal advisors and be presented to Council within three months.
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Nil
File Ref: S24/0023V01
File Name: SA Recruitment and Selection of the Chief
Executive Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Mayor
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Charles Johnson
Meeting Date: 6 May 2008
Recommendation
THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to
discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section
5.23(2), as follows:
·
(a) a matter affecting an employee or employees;
EndOfRecommendation - This line
will not be printed Please do NOT delete
The next Ordinary Councillors
Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday, 27 May 2008,
to be held at the Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
