7.00pm, 23 September, 2008
Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Council allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and statement time:
· Questions should only relate to the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or employees.
· Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
· The first priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
· The second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
Deputations
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing, at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A request for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the Friday before the Council Meeting.
· A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
· Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for tape recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Meetings.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, of electors and of the Audit Committee shall be recorded, by the City, on sound recording equipment except, in the case of meetings of the Council or the Audit Committee, where the Council or the Committee, as the case may be, closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding sub clause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council or of the Audit Committee which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council or the Audit Committee, as the case requires, resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recorded Tapes
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of the taped proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer.
(5) Elected Members may listen to a recording of the Council proceedings upon request, free of charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer.
(6) Costs of providing taped proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the tape plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recordings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s schedule of fees and charges each year.
Retention of Tapes
(7) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the Library Board of Western Australia Act (1951-83), General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records. The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(8) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors and the Audit Committee meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 23 September, 2008 commencing at 7.00pm.
D SIMMS
Chief Executive Officer
18 September 2008
CONTENTS
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-09/08 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 August 2008
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
PT01-08/08 Objections to Proposed Modifications to Rosebud Court, Landsdale
PT02-08/08 Request for Kevo Place, Landsdale to Remain a Cul-de-sac
PT03-08/08 Break in Median Island on Belleville Gardens, Clarkson
PD01-09/08 Draft City of Wanneroo Activity Centres Strategy
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
PD04-09/08 Proposed District Structure Plan for Yanchep-Two Rocks
PD05-09/08 Amendment No 1 - Hocking Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No 42
PD07-09/08 Development Application -925 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo: Proposed 'Bikini Girls Massage'
PD10-09/08 Development Applications Determined By Delegated Authority For August 2008
PD11-09/08 Subdivision Applications Determined Under Delegated Authority During August 2008
IN01-09/08 Tender No 08031 - The Supply and Delivery of Three Trucks of Varying Configurations
IN03-09/08 Tender No 08037 - Provision of Glass and Glazing Services for a Period of Three Years
IN04-09/08 Tender No. 08039 - The Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres for a Period of One Year
IN05-09/08 Parking Prohibitions - Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie
IN06-09/08 Parking Prohibitions - Church Street and Shaw Road, Wanneroo
IN07-09/08 Parking Prohibitions - Southmead Drive, Landsdale
IN08-09/08 South Wanneroo Traffic Management - Ocean Reef Road and Backshall Place
CS01-09/08 Warrant of Payments - For the Period to 31 August 2008
CS02-09/08 Financial Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 July 2008
CS04-09/08 Quinns Rocks Caravan Park - Long Stay Tenancy Arrangements
CD01-09/08 Playspace Name Selection
CD02-09/08 Annual Appointment of Bush Fire Control Officers - 2008/2009 Bush Fire Season
CD03-09/08 Response to Petition PT03-07/08 Installation of CCTV Observatory Drive, Clarkson
CD04-09/08 People Against Vandalism - Donation Request
GS01-09/08 Repeal of Standing Orders Local Law 2000 and Adoption of Standing Orders Local Law 2008
GS02-09/08 Amendments to City of Wanneroo Local Laws
GS03-09/08 Amendment of Recording and Access to Tape Recordings of Council Meetings Policy
GS05-09/08 Donation Requests to be Considered by Council
GS06-09/08 Strategic Plan Review 2008
GS07-09/08 Tender No 08036 - Provision for Contract Labour Hire Services
CE02-09/08 Appointment of Acting Directors
CE03-09/08 Engagement of Assistance to Lobby Federal Government
MN01-09/08 Cr Blencowe - 'U' Turn Facility on Alexander Drive, Alexander Heights
MN02-09/08 Deputy Mayor Treby - Continued Representation on Council - Cr Paul Miles
MN03-09/08 Cr Steffens - Speed Limit on Wanneroo Road in the Vicinity of Hester Avenue Nowergup
AGENDA
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 August 2008 be confirmed.
Cr Treby presented a petition with 32 signatures objecting to the proposed modifications to Rosebud Court, Landsdale to make it an access road for the proposed East Landsdale development.
Consideration of the petition will be made when the East Wanneroo Cell 9 Structure Plan is presented to Council for determination.
Cr Grierson presented a petition with 115 signatures requesting that Kevo Place, Landsdale remain a cul-de-sac.
Consideration of the petition will be made when the East Wanneroo Cell 9 Structure Plan is presented to Council for determination
Cr Smithson presented a petition with 258 signatories requesting that Council construct a break in the centre median island near the western end of Belleville Gardens, Clarkson.
UPDATE
A report should be presented to 21 October 2008 Council meeting.
Cr Roberts to declare an impartial interest in Item CD04-09/08 due to being involved in the People Against Vandalism programme in relation to the schools education programme.
File Ref: S27/0085V01
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Author: Phil Thompson
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 4
File Name: AA Draft City of Wanneroo Activity Centres Strategy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a draft City of Wanneroo Activity Centres Strategy.
Background
The current Centres Strategy, while adopted by Council in December 2004, was commenced well prior to that, in 1999. It included retail modelling aimed to a target year of 2006, and therefore included a recommendation that it also be reviewed in 2006. The related Centres Policy also has a review date of December 2006. Review of the current Strategy is therefore appropriate. Review is also desirable to enable consideration of significant changes to relevant strategic and policy frameworks (eg. Introduction of Network City and the City’s Smart Growth Strategy) as well as major structure plan proposals (eg. The draft District Structure Plans for the Alkimos-Eglinton and Yanchep-Two Rocks areas).
Consultant Peter McNabb and Associates has been engaged by the City to review the current Centres Strategy involving the preparation of a new Activity Centres Strategy for the City of Wanneroo.
Mr McNabb subsequently attended the Smart Growth Steering Group Meeting of 18 March 2008 and presented a draft Discussion Paper he had prepared. The Steering Group recommended to Council that the Discussion Paper be released for submissions.
Council considered the draft Discussion Paper at its
meeting of 8 April 2008 (Item
PD01-04/08) and resolved to approve the release of it for public consultation.
Detail
The Discussion Paper was released for a six week public comment period concluding on 30 May 2008.
Eighteen submissions have been received and those have been summarised and assessed by the consultant (see Attachment 1).
Section 3 of the assessment report sets out the conclusions that the consultant has drawn from his assessment of the submissions.
Following his assessment of the submissions, the consultant has now submitted a draft Activity Centres Strategy (see Attachment 2).
The draft Strategy comprises the following sections:
1. Introduction: which reviews the background leading up to the preparation of the draft Strategy, including the main issues covered in the Discussion Paper.
2. Policy Context: both at State and Local level.
3. Metropolitan and Regional Context: including review of the key elements of the draft District Structure Plans (DSP) being prepared for Alkimos-Eglinton and Yanchep-Two Rocks.
4. Vision: “To develop a vibrant, diverse and sustainable network of mixed use activity centres throughout the City of Wanneroo with a sense of place and community, and a strong transit, walking and cycling orientation.”
5. Sustainability principles: economic, social and environmental principles.
6. Objectives: nine objectives which support the vision.
7. Overall strategies: Two overall strategies supported by a series of detailed ‘sub-strategies’.
8. New Framework for Wanneroo’s Activity Centres: proposes a new framework involving the following activity centre types:
· Strategic Regional Centre
· Regional Centres
· District Centres
· Neighbourhood Centres
· Coastal Tourist Villages
· Local Centres
For each activity centre type, the roles, criteria and listing of each existing and future centres of that type are given.
Guidance is provided for how proposed additions or revisions to the framework should be assessed.
9. Strategies to Strengthen the Network of Activity Centres: various strategies proposed under the headings of:
· Improved overall planning and development of centres
· Better retail and commercial development
· Enhancement of community facilities and services
· Housing diversification
· Enhanced urban design
· Public transport improvements
· Traffic and pedestrian management improvements
· Car parking improvements
Business development and centre management strategies also are proposed for established centres.
10. Approach to Out-of-Centre Development: defines out-of-centre development; identifies the problems associated with it; proposes strategies for how to deal with it.
11. Assessment of Development Applications and Centre Expansion Proposals: provides guidance, including criteria, concerning how such assessments should be undertaken.
12. Implementation: identifies planning measures and Council and Government place-based implementation programs.
13. Monitoring and Review: proposes annual monitoring and evaluation, and a major review of the Strategy after five years.
Consultation
The consultation measures used in respect to the Discussion Paper involved the following:
· Advertisements in local newspapers
· Copies in libraries
· Placed on City website
· Letters to a wide range of public, industry and community interest groups.
A similar consultation program is proposed in respect to the draft Strategy.
Comment
Key features
The following are key features of the draft Strategy, including key differences from the current Centres Strategy:
1. A new centres framework, or network (see point 8. in ‘Detail’ section above, and Section 8 of the draft Strategy for further detail). Attachment 3 shows the hierarchy used in the current Centres Strategy, for comparison. It may be noted that two new centre-types are proposed: Strategic Regional Centre and Coastal Tourist Village.
The proposed new strategy uses the term ‘network’ rather than ‘hierarchy’ (based on retail floorspace) as used in the current strategy. Hierarchy implies that the top centres are the most important and they contain the highest amount of retail floorspace. The consultant wishes to change this emphasis – centres at all levels in the network are important, and may have an emphasis on other uses rather than just retailing. The neighbourhood centres, for example, are very important because they need to provide day-to-day things for local communities.
2. New retail floorspace guidelines for retail, as well as commercial and other uses (educational, health, entertainment, leisure or community services). Attachment 3 includes the retail (shopping) floorspace guide under the current Centres Strategy.
It should be noted however that the draft Strategy’s guidelines regarding floorspace are intended to operate very much as guidelines, and not as ‘caps’ (in the case of maximums). This could mean, for example, that under some circumstances, a District Centre could be larger than the 30,000 sq m retail floorspace guideline figure given for District Centres in section 8 of the draft Strategy.
3. No specification of retail ‘caps’ for individual centres in the Strategy itself. The current Centres Strategy includes such specification (see Attachment 4). The draft Strategy sees that it is still appropriate and desirable to have retail caps for each centre included as per current practice, in either Schedule 3 of District Planning Scheme No 2 (DPS2) or Structure Plans and the reasons for this are set out in section 8. However, it sees that this should best occur as an outcome of the structure planning and associated retail modelling studies carried out for the proposed development areas concerned, rather than through the Centres Strategy.
4. Inclusion of proposed strategies for achieving the strategy vision. This is one of the most important differences from the current Centres Strategy, which takes the more conventional approach in serving as more of a regulatory tool. The draft Strategy proposes a much more proactive approach by the City, which will have implications for resourcing to achieve this.
5. Inclusion of proposals, as they currently stand, for the future major growth areas of Alkimos-Eglinton and Yanchep-Two Rocks.
Review of Metropolitan Centres Policy
As part of the process of implementing Network City, the State planning agencies are reviewing the current Metropolitan Centres Policy Statement for the Perth Metropolitan Region (SPP No 9). A new draft Metropolitan Activity Centres Policy is expected to be released for comment around December of this year.
In the meantime, in an endeavour to arrive at a new Activity Centres Strategy for the City of Wanneroo which will be generally in line with the new metropolitan centres strategy, the consultant and Administration have been liaising closely with the officers of the Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI) who have been involved with the preparation of the new metropolitan strategy.
However, at the most recent briefing provided by DPI officers, it became clear that the new metropolitan strategy was looking to take a shape which would not have been appropriate for this City to seek to work to. Essentially, it is looking to concentrate new centres-related activity in the inner and middle parts of the metropolitan region, with little such activity in the outer growth areas such as this City.
It has therefore been concluded that rather than this draft Strategy seeking to work within the developing metropolitan strategy, it should seek to influence it to ensure that it satisfactorily addresses our part of the region.
It is recommended that a briefing of Elected Members by DPI on this matter be sought.
Sinagra/Tapping Neighbourhood Centres Issue
At its meeting of 8 April 2008 (item PD06-04/08), Council resolved to defer consideration of the proposal involving the deletion of the two planned neighbourhood centres in Sinagra and Tapping, and instead having a single neighbourhood centre on Pinjar Road, Ashby (proposed ‘Ashby Village’ centre), pending completion of the City’s Centres Strategy Review project and a review of the retail floor space requirements in the East Wanneroo Cells 1 and 2. It may be noted that the draft Strategy supports the above proposal (as reflected in the Neighbourhood Centres table and related plan in section 8).
The consultant’s reasons for this is that the proposed single centre (‘Ashby Village’) would provide a larger mainstream supermarket which would enable a stronger convenience-oriented neighbourhood centre. This would overcome a key weakness in other existing neighbourhood centres.
Council’s decision on this proposal has been the subject of an appeal by the proponents to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT). The SAT hearings have been completed and SAT delivered its decision on 10 September 2008. SAT has upheld the appeal and issued orders for the City to amend the relevant Structure Plans and to submit them to the WAPC for approval. WAPC will then consider and make a decision on the proposal, taking into consideration SAT’s reasons for its decision.
Local Planning Policy
The current Centres Strategy also has effect as a Local Planning Policy (LPP) prepared and adopted under DPS2. It is proposed that the new Strategy also be adopted as a LPP under DPS2, to supersede the current LPP so that its status and standing is clear.
Statutory Compliance
Preparation and adoption of the proposed Strategy as a LPP under DPS2 will need to be undertaken in accordance with Clause 8.11.3 of DPS2.
Strategic Implications
This project has important implications for the social, environmental and economic outcomes sought by the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021.
Policy Implications
This project will result in the replacement of the City’s current policy on Centres with a new policy.
Financial Implications
Funds are budgeted for the preparation of the new Strategy.
The undertaking of some of the strategies themselves will be likely to have financial implications for the City, however they are unable to be costed at this point as they are of a general nature. The proactive approach recommended in the new strategy will have financial and resource implications for the City of Wanneroo. In order to develop Structure Plans for key activity centres, the City will require the services of additional specialist staff and a budget for consulting services beyond current capacities. It is anticipated that the City would look to recoup some of this expenditure from land developers. The City should also seek resources from DPI to assist with centre planning.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 8.11.3 of City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2, ADOPTS the draft City of Wanneroo Activity Centres Strategy attached to this report as a draft Local Planning Policy, intended to supersede the current Centres Local Planning Policy;
2. PROCEEDS with consultation on the draft Strategy pursuant to Clause 8.11.3 of the Scheme; and
3. SEEKS a briefing for Elected Members from the Department for Planning and Infrastructure regarding progress and current directions envisaged for the draft Metropolitan Activity Centres Strategy.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Town Planning Schemes and Structure Plans
File Ref: TPS/0092V01
File Name: BA Amendment No 92 to the District Planning Scheme No 2 Lot 8 Greenfields Circle Hocking Recode from Residential R.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Timothy Dawson
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an amendment to the District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS) to recode Lot 8 (94) Greenfields Circle, Hocking from Residential R20 to R40.
Applicant |
WHELANS |
Owner |
Sabina V Hammersmith |
Location |
Lots 7 (92) and 8 (94) Greenfields Circle, Hocking |
Site Area |
4036m2 |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Background
In July 2008, Whelans Town Planning submitted a proposal to the City requesting it to initiate an amendment to the DPS2 by recoding the subject lot from Residential R20 to R40.
Detail
Site
The subject site is 4036m2 in area. Attachment 1 contains the location plan. The lot located on Greenfields Circle is a dual-frontage lot as it also gains access from Wattle Mews on the eastern side. The land contains a house constructed in 1983 and a pool in 1984. The site, surrounded by residential development, is heavily vegetated. The eastern side of the lot overlooks a developed public open space (POS). A range in residential density between R20 and R40 exists in close proximity to the subject lot, with the majority of medium density (R30/R40) occurring within the adjoining East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan (Refer Attachment 2).
Proposal
The proposal seeks to amend DPS2 by recoding the subject land from R20 to R40. Attachment 3 contains a concept plan showing an indication of the form of development which may occur on the lot.
The applicant’s justification for the proposal can be summarised as follows:
1. Under the current coding of R20, grouped housing development is considered an underutilisation of the land in light of the nearby R40 development on Lot 436 Elliot Road, and the surrounding amenities including the nearby POS.
2. Public transport is available on Elliot Road with bus services 467 and 469 to Joondalup Train Station and the Whitfords Shopping Centre. Wanneroo Road, which is 700 metres away provides more bus services.
Consultation
All scheme amendments require public consultation. The consultation period is normally 42 days and is undertaken by way of an on-site advertising sign, advertisements in the local newspaper and on the City’s website, as well as letters to relevant service agencies and adjacent landowners.
The Town Planning Regulations provide that where an amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and State policies and strategies, the consent of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) will not be required to advertise the amendment. The WAPC’s consent to advertise will, however, be required if an advertising period less than 42 days is sought. Given that the proposed amendment is consistent with the MRS zoning and State policies, as the applicant is not proposing to rezone but to recode, and the recommended advertising period being 42 days, the consent of the WAPC is not required in this instance.
Smart Growth Strategy
The proposal satisfies the following principle of the City’s Smart Growth Strategy:-
“5.1 Lifestyle and Housing Choice
· By promoting a range of lot sizes to cater for different lifestyle; and
· By promoting a range of housing type in appropriate locations to meet the current and future market demands.”
Comment
The following comments are made on the proposal.
1. Bus Route
The subject site is located within 250 metres from the bus route on Elliot Road. The City’s Housing Strategy as a guide allows a higher density up to R30 within 250 metres of a bus route. The proposed R40 coding is recommended, as it would provide more housing near a bus route.
2. Traffic
The concept plan depicts a possible 17 units, which could generate a traffic volume of up to 136 vehicles per day (vpd) at the rate of 8vpd per dwelling. The width of the road reserve and carriageway of both abutting roads are 20 and 7.5 metres respectively. Under the provisions of the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhood policy, this road has a capacity to carry up to 3000 vehicles per day. A traffic count in May 2002 indicated that Greenfields Circle carried a traffic volume of 734 vpd. Allowing for the residential development that occurred since then, the current traffic volume on this road is extrapolated to 850 vpd.
Wattle Mews does not provide direct connection to Elliot Road and therefore it is likely to carry a lesser volume of traffic. Therefore, the additional traffic generated by the proposal will not affect the traffic flow on the abutting roads.
3. Vegetation
In regard to the vegetation present within the site, the City’s Environmental Section has confirmed that there are no significant trees worthy of preservation.
4. Proximity to Open Space
A portion of the site has direct frontage to Wattle Mews and overlooks open space. The concept plan indicates that there will be access from the site directly onto Wattle Mews and therefore the future residents will have good access to the use and enjoyment of the open space.
5. Existing R40 sites
Attachment 2 depicts the distribution of existing R20, R30 and R40 sites within this locality. The East Wanneroo Cell 4 ASP has been prepared to define R30 and R40 densities for many of the lots fronting open space. In this regard, the two large lots located east of the subject property have been developed with group dwellings (Refer aerial photo - Attachment 4). Lot 208 is coded R20 (adjoining lot) and has been developed with six group dwellings and Lot 436 is coded R40 and has been developed with 15 group dwellings. On this basis and despite the R20 density coding of the adjoining landholding (Lot 208), the proposed increase in density and subsequent development of group dwellings on Lot 8 is considered to be ‘in keeping’ with the nature and standard of development in this area. The relatively large lot area is also conducive to a more comprehensive development at a higher density than smaller lots.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the amendment proposal be initiated.
Statutory Compliance
The scheme amendment will follow the statutory process outlined in the Town Planning Regulations.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006 to 2021:
“2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 92 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 submitted by Whelans Town Planning on behalf of Sabina V Hammersmith to recode Lot 8 (94) Greenfields Circle, Hocking from Residential R20 to R40;
2. REFERS Amendment No. 92 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. Should the EPA advise that the amendment does not require assessment, ADVERTISE the amendment for a period of 42 days; and
3. FORWARD a copy of the amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0005/22
File Name: BA Amendment No 22 to the East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan Rezoning of Lots 950 Paltara Way 12 23 and 9401.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Timothy Dawson
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Amendment No.22 to the East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan (ASP).
Applicant |
Koltasz Smith |
Owner |
Gucce Holding Pty Ltd |
Location |
Lots 9500 Paltara Way, 21 and 9401 & 9402 Elliot Road and 2 Lenore Road, Wanneroo |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Special Residential and Urban Development |
Cell 4 ASP Zoning |
Special Residential |
Background
Council at its meeting of 3 June 2008, as part of Omnibus Amendment No.4B to various Agreed Structure Plans (ASP), considered Amendment No.22 to the East Wanneroo Cell 4 ASP to rezone portion of Lots 9500 Paltara Way, 21, 9401 and 9402 Elliot Road and 2 Lenore Road, Wanneroo from Special Residential Zone to Special Residential and Residential (R20) Zones and resolved to not support the proposal for the following reasons (Item PD03-06/08):
“a) Being separated from the abutting road, the Special Residential lots will be deprived of road frontage;
b) Located behind a row of R20 lots and sharing the rear fence of the R20 blocks as the side boundary, the amenity of the Special Residential Lots will be affected;
c) The subject land is located in line with a Public Open Space (POS). Along with the POS area, the Special Residential lots with frontage to the road would provide a desirable streetscape; and
d) Such a proposal would set an undesirable precedent.”
Aggrieved by the Council’s decision, the applicant appealed to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) and the matter was considered at the SAT’s Compulsory Conference held on 19 August 2008. In order to accommodate the applicant’s request, the SAT pursuant to Section 31 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act has invited the City to reconsider its decision at its meeting of 23 September 2008. In this regard, the SAT has noted that the invitation to reconsider does not imply the initial decision was necessarily incorrect, but rather in this case the invitation to reconsider will at least enable the City to cure a potential jurisdictional problem for the SAT in the event the matter goes to a hearing.
In this regard, it is noted that the amendment was refused by Council and was not advertised for public comment. Part 9.7.2 of the scheme specifies that “Public Notice of the amendment or revocation shall be given in accordance with Clause 9.5 but, in the case of an amendment the public notification may be waived when the amendment is considered by the Council to be of a minor nature such as not to materially alter the intent of the Agreed Structure Plan or cause any significant detriment to land within or abutting the Structure Plan area.”
If the matter proceeds to a hearing in the SAT, and the City has not determined that the modification is of a minor nature, the SAT cannot approve the proposal unless the modification has first been advertised.
Detail
Attachments 1 and 2 show the existing and proposed ASP zoning and coding of the subject land respectively.
Currently in the ASP, the subject lots are zoned Special Residential with a minimum lot size of 5000m2 (equating to a density coding of R2) as a buffer between the residential areas and the Special Rural Zone located to the north of the subject lots.
The applicant had provided the following justification for this proposal:
1. The proposal would provide a housing variety; and
2. Through the introduction of R20 lots it would improve the streetscape.
Consultation
Under the provisions of the DPS2 and in accordance with the State Administrative Tribunal’s invitation to reconsider the decision, it is recommended that the proposal be subject to public consultation for a period of 28 days by way of on-site signs, an advertisement in the local newspaper and on the City’s website and letters to the affected and nearby landowners.
Comment
Additional Information
Following the SAT’s orders, the applicant has provided the City with additional information addressing the reasons for refusing the proposal. The applicant’s responses together with Administration’s comments are provided below.
1. Road Frontage
The applicant has noted that the Special Residential (R2) lots will have road frontage to either Paltara Way or the east-west subdivisional road (refer Attachment 3).
Comment
In this regard, it is noted that the proposal is to create four R2 lots (5000m2). Proposed Lot 11 would have full lot frontage and access to Paltara Way, however, the other lots would need to gain access from the east-west subdivisional road, via a battleaxe lot configuration and therefore would not enjoy a full frontage to a primary road.
It is also noted that the effectiveness of the transitional ‘Special Residential’ zoning would be significantly reduced because of its reduced road frontage and visibility from the road.
2. Loss of Amenity
The applicant has advised that through the placement of building envelopes and revegetation, the dwellings would have primary views to the abutting roads or the adjoining POS. There would be no overlooking into the adjoining R20 lots due to the existing contours of the land.
Comment
It is noted that the applicant has not addressed the amenity issue by providing the above response.
Administration is concerned that these R2 lots, by sharing their side boundaries with the rear boundaries of the adjoining R20 lots, the ‘R2’ residents may, as a result, have a reduced level of amenity.
The applicant has pointed out that the R2 lots would be at an elevated level in comparison to the R20 lots. Attachment 3 depicts cross sections provided by the applicant and whilst the proposed Lots 11 and 12 would be at an elevated level of about 4 metres above the R20 lots, the other two proposed Lots 21 and 22 will be at the same level with the adjoining R20 lots.
3. Streetscape
The applicant has indicated that through the introduction of R20 lots the resultant streetscape will represent a more consistent urban streetscape that is reflective of the urban character of the residential estate.
Comment
By providing exclusively R2 lots on the northern side of the east-west road, these lots in line with the proposed Public Open Space area will provide a variety and diversity of housing, however more importantly there will be a uniform edge along the northern side, which promotes a combination of special residential and open space to promote a legible and effective transition buffer to the existing Special Rural zone located north of the proposed development.
4. Undesirable Precedent
The applicant has indicated that the proposal will not set an undesirable precedent.
Comment
The incorporation of the R20 onto the northern side of the road would represent a precedent for the further erosion of the transition buffer through subsequent applications based on a simular rational and a logical expansion of the proposed R20.
In this regard, it is noted that the DPS2 makes provisions for R2 lots in the localities of Carramar and Banksia Grove. Additionally, the Cell 2 and five ASPs also make provision for these lots. While all the R2 lots in Cell 5 and Banksia Grove are developed, the R2 lots in Carramar and Cell 2 are yet to be developed. If the applicant’s proposal is approved, the City may receive requests to amend the DPS2 and Cell 2 ASP accordingly, thereby undermining the effectiveness of these types of transition buffers.
DPS2 Amendment – Additional Information
Out of the five subject lots, Lot 9401 and Portion of Lot 9402 Elliot Road are zoned Special Residential Zone and the other lots (Lots 9500, 21 and 2) are zoned Urban Development in the DPS2 (Attachment 4). This issue is fundamental in establishing the applicable statutory mechanism for planning control. The applicant while making a request to amend the ASP, inadvertently omitted the requirement to seek an amendment to the DPS2. The introduction of an R20 density coding over these lots (where DPS2 depicts Special Residential), would result in a direct conflict with the zoning of the land, and as such, in accordance with Part 9.8.3 (f) of the scheme, the scheme will take priority over any amendment to the structure plan. In this regard, it would be necessary for an amendment to the scheme to be initiated to facilitate any changes made to the zoning of these lots (Lots 9401 and 9402) under the structure plan. In this regard the following matters are noted.
Part 9.8.3 (f) of the scheme requires that “any other provision, standard or requirement in the Structure Plan shall be given the same force and effect as if it was a provision standard or requirement of this Scheme, but subject to the provision of subclause 9.8.3(b) allowing for a specific variation to a Scheme standard or requirement by a Structure Plan, if there is any other inconsistency or conflict not addressed as an intended variation by the Agreed Structure Plan, the provision requirement or standard of the Scheme shall prevail”, and
Subclause 9.8.3(b) of the DPS2 states that “the standards and requirements applicable to zones and R Codings under the Scheme shall apply to the same extent to the areas having corresponding designations under the Agreed Structure Plan; however notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (f), an Agreed Structure Plan may by a clear statement of intent to do so, make provision for any standard or requirement applicable to zones or R Codings to be varied, and the standard or requirement varied in that way shall apply within the Agreed Structure Plan, or any stipulated part of that area, as if it was a variation incorporated in the Scheme.”
The intention of the above provisions is to allow the variation of standards and requirements applicable pursuant to zones or R Codings (eg, setbacks), but not an amendment or variation to the applicable zone or coding itself. On this basis, it is appropriate for the applicant to amend the DPS2 to rezone a portion of the Special Residential Zone to remove any conflict between the proposed amendment to the structure plan and the zoning under DPS2.
Since two of the subject lots are zoned Special Residential under DPS2, the administration’s view is that the appeal of the resolution of Council could be ineffective for two of the lots, and would not be consistent with orderly and proper planning.
It is recommended that the applicant be requested to seek an amendment to the DPS2 prior to the City considering the amendment to Cell 4 ASP.
Reconsideration
As part of the City’s representation at the State Administrative Tribunal, the City’s solicitors have advised that on reconsidering the matter, Council should expressly determine whether or not the amendment is considered to be minor in nature. The determinations open to Council would be to:
a) Determine that the amendment is minor, in which case it does not require advertising, and then either refuse or approve the proposal; or
b) Determine that the proposal is not a minor amendment and therefore requires advertising. If Council determines that the amendment is not a minor modification to the Structure Plan, advertising should occur (even if the Council does not favour the amendment) before any final decision is made.
In this regard, administration considers that the amendment does propose a fundamental change to the zoning of the land in a manner that could have a detrimental impact on adjoining or nearby landowners, and as such, the application is not considered to be of a minor nature and should be advertised, irrespective of Council’s previous resolution not to support.
Statutory Compliance
The proposed Amendments to the ASPs will follow the statutory process outlined in Part 9 of DPS2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DETERMINES pursuant to Clause 9.7.2 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 that the proposed Amendment No. 22 to the East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan is NOT of a minor nature such as not to materially alter the intent of the Agreed Structure Plan or cause any significant detriment to land within or abutting the Structure Plan area;
2. Pursuant to Clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADVERTISES proposed Amendment No. 22 to the East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan for a period of 28 days and refers to Council the outcomes of the consultation process in due course for a determination; and
3. ADVISES the applicant Koltasz Smith Town Planning acting on behalf of Gucce Holdings Pty Ltd that an amendment to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 is required to rezone Lot 9401 and a portion of Lots 9402 Elliot Road, Wanneroo from Special Residential Zone to Urban Development Zone, to facilitate any amendment to the zoning under the East Wanneroo Cell 4 Agreed Structure Plan and that given Council’s previous resolution to refuse the application it is unlikely that such an amendment to the scheme would be initiated.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0054V02
File Name: BA Proposed District Structure Plan for Yanchep Two Rocks.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Author: John Corbellini
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: 5
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed District Structure Plan for the Yanchep-Two Rocks localities with a view to determining what modifications are to be required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
Applicant |
Tokyu Corporation represented by Roberts Day Urban Design & Town Planning |
Owner |
Tokyu Corporation, Yanchep Sun City and Capricorn Investment Group, St Andrews Private Estate & New Orion Investments, Fini Group, Kincardine Holdings, Western Australian Land Authority, WAPC and others. |
Location |
Yanchep-Two Rocks |
Site Area |
7550 ha |
MRS Zoning |
Urban, Urban Deferred, Central City Area, Rural, Industrial, Parks & Recreation, Public purposes, Transport Reserves |
DPS2 Zoning |
Various (in general accordance with MRS) |
Background
The area covered by the Yanchep-Two Rocks District Structure Plan represents the final stage of development of the North-West Corridor, in accordance with the broad regional framework established under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS). The area subject of the current District Structure Plan represents a significant portion of the area covered by the North-West Corridor Structure Plan 1992, which is currently under review by the WAPC.
The area extends northwards from Eglinton to the northern extremity of the Metropolitan Region, and includes the existing town sites of Yanchep and Two Rocks as well as the Sun City Country Club estate, the Capricorn Village estate and the new rural-residential development known as Sea Trees in the north-east of the site. Attachment 1 details the extent of the District Structure Plan area, with existing development areas identified.
The purpose of the proposed Yanchep-Two Rocks District Structure Plan is to provide a district-level framework for the coordination of more detailed planning and development at the local level. This will include a number of separate Local Structure Plans.
The draft District Structure Plan, together with a preliminary, officer-level assessment (refer Attachment 2), was considered by the Council at its meeting on 7 August 2007 at which time it was approved (conditionally) for the purpose of advertising, as follows:
That Council:-
“1. DETERMINES (pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2) that the proposed District Structure Plan is satisfactory for the purposes of advertising, having been modified in accordance with the recommendations in the Preliminary Assessment report at Attachment 2.
2. ADVISES the proponent of the determination referred to in Recommendation 1 above, but that it is required to undertake the additional work as recommended in Attachment 2 during the advertising period.
3. FORWARDS a copy of the proposed District Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission, in accordance with the provisions of Clause 9.4.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2, and provides copies also to relevant agencies, with an invitation to comment.
4. ADVERTISES the proposed District Structure Plan in accordance with the provisions of Clause 9.5.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 for a period of 42 days. (Such advertisement and publicity is to be undertaken by the proponent in accordance with the provisions of Clause 6.7 of the Scheme, as directed by the City.)”
The submissions received during the advertisement period, and a set of recommended modifications were considered by the Council at its meeting on 29 August 2008. At this time the proponents of the proposed District Structure Plan stated their disagreement with the inclusion of staging provisions in the statutory section, Part 1, of the proposed District Structure Plan. The proponents also presented a legal letter, dated 28 July 2008, to the Councillors advising that the inclusion of staging in Part 1 of the proposed District Structure Plan was invalid. Council then resolved the following:
“That the item be referred back to Council Administration for legal advice.”
Legal Advice
Administration requested legal advice from McLeods Barristers and Solicitors regarding the 28 July 2008 legal letter from the proponents. Legal advice was received from McLeods on 14 August 2008 to the effect that the inclusion of staging in Part 1 of the proposed District Structure Plan does not have a binding statutory effect, but rather is in the nature of a guideline or policy, and that therefore there is no conflict between the staging requirement and Part 9 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2). The legal advice provided by McLeods did not agree with the conclusion of the proponent’s legal letter, that the staging requirement is invalid.
Further legal advice was received from McLeods on 20 August 2008 to the effect that Recommendation 1 of PD15-07/08 presented to Council at its meeting on 29 July 2008 is valid, however, its effect could be further clarified if modified slightly by making it clear in the recommendation that in the event that agreement cannot be reached with the proponents on matters still to be resolved that these be referred back to Council for determination.
Furthermore, McLeods consider that the alternative recommendation suggested by the proponent’s lawyers to be referred to Council, is not supported.
On the basis of the above legal advice it is recommended that reference to a staging strategy be included in Part 1 of the District Structure Plan (DSP) as originally proposed by Administration. The staging strategy will ensure the balanced provision of housing and employment as well as other necessary infrastructure such as public open space, schools, community facilities, retail etc. The wording of the staging strategy has yet to be prepared and if there is not agreement between the Director of Planning and Sustainability and the proponents this matter will be reported back to Council for determination prior to the DSP being forwarded formally to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
A copy of the proponent’s legal letters and the City’s legal advice is available in the Elected Members’ Reading Room.
Consultation
Submissions
In response to the advertising of the draft District Structure Plan, a total of 30 written submissions were received from external agencies and individuals, in addition to which some 33 issues were identified at an open day arranged to provide wider community input. Detailed comment has also been provided by the City’s planning, infrastructure and community development directorates.
Attachment 3 to this report includes a schedule of written submissions (Table 1) as well as the submissions put forward by participants at the open day forum (Table 2), issues raised by the City’s directorates (Table 3) and comments received from officers of DPI (Table 4), and includes:
· source of the submission (submissions from individuals are identified as ‘private’);
· summary of each of the submissions;
· officer comment on each of the matters raised; and
· recommendation as to the action (if any) which is considered appropriate.
Attachment 4 to this report includes a revised version of Part 1 of the District Structure Plan together with a revised District Structure Plan Map, showing those changes recommended in response to the submissions referred to in Attachment 3.
Issues raised in submissions cover a wide variety of matters, ranging from support for the proposal, to objections to any urban expansion, to comment on the details of design. The following are illustrative of the range of issues raised in those submissions, which included an objection or expression of concern about the proposed development (some submissions were supportive of the proposal):
· Further urban expansion is not warranted and would be detrimental;
· St Andrews is not an appropriate name for the area;
· Development will have an adverse impact on the natural environment;
· Insufficient open space is provided for recreation and flora/fauna;
· Coastal setbacks should be increased and there should be no new marinas;
· Land should not be allocated within the District Structure Plan area for large-scale general industry;
· There needs to be a significant allocation of office floorspace to provide employment;
· Some changes are required to the district road network and regional road reservations;
· Detailed design of roads through major centres needs to be reviewed;
· Alignment of the railway needs to be amended in the vicinity of the regional centre;
· Greater emphasis needs to be given to water management and use; and
· Development needs to be staged to ensure services and employment is timely.
Further detail of the submissions is summarized in Attachment 3.
Response to submissions
The comment and recommendations in Attachment 3 represent the officer-level response to each of the submissions. Changes to Part 1 (Statutory provisions) of the District Structure Plan and associated District Structure Plan Map are included in Attachment 4, while changes to Part 2 (Explanatory provisions) are proposed to be finalised following the Council’s consideration of this report, and in accordance with the general and specific recommendations in Attachment 3.
Major changes recommended to the District Structure Plan as advertised (both in relation to the preliminary assessment and in response to submissions) include:
Previously identified changes (foreshadowed in preliminary assessment and not undertaken prior to advertising)
· Re-casting of Part 1 (Statutory provisions): This has been completed, and is included in Attachment 4. It includes specific requirements relating to such matters as environment, residential density, employment, infrastructure and staging.
· Karst assessment: The updating of reference to the karst assessment has been completed and will be incorporated in the final amended version of the District Structure Plan.
· Centres classification: This requires a review of the classification of activity centres so as to accord with the system used in the City’s Centres Strategy as well as the WAPC’s Metropolitan Centres Policy (having regard to the work currently being undertaken on the review of these Strategies).
· Centres: This requires a review of the distribution of neighbourhood and local centres and the re-allocation of retail floorspace to such centres generally in accordance with the City’s Centres Strategy, the WAPC’s Metropolitan Centres Policy (having regard to the work currently being undertaken on the review of these Strategies), and Liveable Neighbourhoods.
· Employment allocation: As a consequence of the changes to the commercial centre hierarchy and associated re-allocation of retail floorspace referred to in the preceding dot point, it may be necessary to review the current economic development strategy and re-allocate employment accordingly. This work will form part of an Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan.
· Green Links: This has been completed and includes modification of the plan and inclusion of reference to local environmental values in LSP guidance.
· Editorial review: This relates to Part 2 of the District Structure Plan, and has yet to be completed. It is proposed the requirement to undertake this work will be reiterated as a condition of the approval and undertaken to the satisfaction of Director Planning and Development, before submission of the District Structure Plan to the WAPC.
Changes in response to submissions
· Name change: Reference to the District Structure Plan area as ‘St Andrews’ to be replaced by ‘Yanchep-Two Rocks’, and ‘St Andrews City Centre’ to be replaced by ‘Yanchep City Centre’.
· Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan: An Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan to be prepared and agreed to by all parties, and to include employment self sufficiency targets as a basis for monitoring performance and ensuring progress towards sustainability in terms of transport and access to employment. This will also include a review of community, sporting and recreation facilities.
· District Staging Strategy: A District Staging Strategy is to be prepared and agreed to by all parties, as a part of an Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan, prior to the approval of LSPs. The District Staging Strategy will identify the link between employment provision and residential development, and will include a mechanism for review.
· Staging: Part 1 to include staging principles and requirements, and reference to the District Staging Strategy.
· Electricity: The District Structure Plan to state that the matter of undergrounding power in areas where it abuts residential development and other sensitive land uses, will be further investigated at LSP stages.
· District Structure Plan boundary: The District Structure Plan area has been contracted to exclude land east of the Freeway reserve. The District Structure Plan boundary is now the eastern edge of the Freeway reserve.
· District Open Space: District Structure Plan to be amended to show three Regional Open Spaces, rather than one Regional Open Space and two District Open Spaces. These three areas will not contribute toward the minimum 10% Public Open Space contribution at the LSP stage.
· Significant Natural Features: A Significant Natural Features map is to be included in Part 2 and referred to in Part 1 so as to guide future development.
· Green Linkages: Part 2 to include guidelines to the design of Green Linkages at the LSP level.
· District water management: The district water management provisions to be consolidated in Part 2, under a specific District Water Management section. These provisions are to be referred to in Part 1 in order to guide Local Water Management Strategies at the LSP stage.
· Marinas: Reference to “Potential Marina” in the legend of the District Structure Plan Map to be amended to read “Possible Future Marina”.
· Coastal villages: These centres to be recognized as activity centres which perform a broader role than neighbourhood centres with commensurately increased floorspace allocations and composition.
· Caravan park: The District Structure Plan to identify the need for an investigation of the location of an interim caravan park, which may be located outside of the District Structure Plan area.
· Allocation of land for employment-generating development, including particularly industrial and commercial land, to be reviewed to ensure there is sufficient land available and that the intensity of development will be sufficient to meet employment self-sufficiency targets. This needs to be undertaken as part of the Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan.
· Regional road network: Road network and capacity to be reviewed in light of the regional transport study currently being undertaken by DPI, the employment self sufficiency targets in the Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan and the District Staging Strategy.
· Environmental impact: The District Structure Plan to make it clear that any additional requirements for environmental assessment under commonwealth environmental legislation will be further addressed at the local structure planning stage.
· Coastal development: The District Structure Plan to make it clear that reduced setbacks in accordance with State Planning Policy 2.6, may be considered for areas in the vicinity of the proposed Coastal Nodes, in order to achieve better integrated coastal development.
· Freeway noise: District Structure Plan Map to highlight the potential for traffic noise for residences located close to the freeway, which will need to be addressed through measures such as lowering the freeway and/or providing noise barriers to ameliorate traffic noise elsewhere.
· Roads through activity centres: District Structure Plan Map to be amended to delete details of specific road alignments through activity centres. This includes proposed couplets, which will be the subject of more detailed planning in conjunction with the preparation of centre plans or LSPs.
· Rail alignment: The District Structure Plan Map to be modified to reflect the alternative rail alignment to the north of the Yanchep City Centre rail station in accordance with the Draft Local Structure Plan No. 68 for the Yanchep City Centre.
· Public Transport: The District Structure Plan Map to be amended to indicate a high frequency public transport link (Secondary Transit System (Bus)) between the north-south boulevard, the coastal activity centres and along the coast.
· Yanchep District High School: District Structure Plan Map to be amended to delete the existing High School, which is proposed to be converted to a primary school when the proposed new eastern high school opens. Consequential change to Part 2 with respect to the number of high schools.
· Co-location of schools and open space: Part 1 to make it clear that schools should be co-located with open space where practicable. Detailed planning of both school sites and open space is to be undertaken at the LSP level.
· Surf life saving facility: The District Structure Plan to refer to the relocation of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving facility as discussed in the environmental assessment report accompanying the District Structure Plan.
Letter of Undertaking for Developer Contribution Arrangements
In addition to the proposed changes to the District Structure Plan referred to above, the proponent has agreed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Council to address a range of infrastructure, servicing and developmental issues which can not be conveniently addressed within the District Structure Plan. A letter of undertaking to this effect is included, as Attachment 5, and includes a draft Developer Contributions Plan, which details the range of issues to be addressed in the MoU.
Detail
Land ownership
Of the 7550 hectares of land within the District Structure Plan area, approximately 2572 hectares are owned by Tokyu Corporation, with an additional 1500 hectares joint ventured between a Tokyu subsidiary and a third party. A further 1500 hectares is owned by, or vested in, the WAPC as reserved for Parks and Recreation. State and Local Government agencies and various other private landowners own the remainder of the District Structure Plan area.
Existing land use and environment
The District Structure Plan includes the existing townsites of Yanchep and Two Rocks, the golf course estate of Sun City Country Club and the new rural residential community of Sea Trees in the north east of the site. The balance of the site is predominantly undeveloped urban zoned land with extensive MRS Parks and Recreation reservations, including the coastal reserve, portion of Eglinton Reserve and the land reserved for Parks and Recreation in the north eastern portion of the District Structure Plan area.
Local Structure Plans have been prepared and endorsed over various portions of the study area and the subdivision is currently proceeding at the Capricorn development north of Yanchep and south of Two Rocks on land owned by P and N Landreach/Zebra Properties. Further subdivision is anticipated to commence shortly in Two Rocks under the provisions of the endorsed LSPs. The first stages of the subdivision and development of Yanchep Estates (corner Yanchep Beach Road and proposed Marmion Avenue), including a District Centre are earmarked for commencement in late 2007/08.
Existing zoning
The bulk of the area is zoned Urban and Urban Deferred under the MRS. Other major elements include a Central City Area zone for the future Yanchep Regional Centre (as identified in the North-West Corridor Structure Plan) and regional Parks and Recreation reservations covering the foreshore and two separate east-west transects. Regional reserves also define a waste water treatment facility site and regional transport routes, including major roads and the extension of the suburban railway network.
The existing MRS zoning and reservations, which were put in place via an amendment to the Region Scheme in June 2006, are largely reflected in the City’s DPS2 although some consequential amendment to the local scheme will be required to maintain consistency with the MRS. An amendment to DPS2 will be required once the District Structure Plan has been finalized.
Overview of Structure Plan
A copy of the proposed District Structure Plan map (as modified) is included as part of Attachment 4 to this report, although it is important to appreciate that the Map needs to be viewed in the context of the accompanying District Structure Plan reports (tabled). Major elements of the District Structure Plan include:
· Incorporation of the two existing townships of Yanchep and Two Rocks, as well as the Sun City Country Club estate and the rural-residential development of Sea Trees.
· Additional regional and district level open space for active recreation to complement the existing conservation and coastal reserves.
· A network of ‘green’ corridors to facilitate the retention of natural elements of the site and to create linkages between the coast and Yanchep National Park.
· A Strategic Regional (City) centre which will be the economic core of the area, and provide the majority of the high-end employment, education and community services.
· A distribution of Regional, District, Neighbourhood and Tourist Activity Centres incorporating shops, services, restaurants, community uses and housing.
· Mixed use employment areas to the south and north of the City Centre to accommodate high-tech businesses.
· A mixed use transit corridor that connects a series of activity nodes, with employment-intensive uses located in close proximity to the centres and higher density residential development between centres.
· Four tertiary institutions, including a large university within the Yanchep City Centre and adjacent to a mixed-use employment area.
· Ten public high schools and recognition of a need for five private high schools as well as around 60 primary schools (to be identified in local structure plans).
· A major regional hospital to provide both health services and training in association with other tertiary institutions.
· Two strategic locations for light and general industrial activities, to provide for industrial uses which do not fit within mixed use neighbourhoods or activity centres.
· A public transport system comprising extension of the northern rail line to the Strategic Regional (City) centre and connections to a local transit service linking the major activity centres and servicing a mixed-use corridor.
· Residential neighbourhoods with a mix of housing and a range of retail, employment, civic and cultural facilities within walking distance of most dwellings.
· An interconnected network of neighbourhood streets that provides for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists.
Yanchep-Two Rocks will be the largest single urban development project in Perth, with around 70,000 dwellings, an ultimate population of around 155,000 and the potential to provide employment for up to 55,000. The City Centre will be the economic core of the area and is estimated to accommodate around 23,500 jobs, which is significantly larger than any existing regional centre in the metropolitan area, and having an employment around one-fifth that of the Perth CBD.
With a resident workforce around 72,000, this would provide a level of employment self-sufficiency of around 76%. When combined with the employment and workforce figures estimated in the consultant’s report for the adjoining Alkimos-Eglinton District Structure Plan area, this would result in a combined employment self-sufficiency in excess of the target of 72% included in the N-W Corridor Structure Plan (1992). The achievement of a relatively high level of employment self-sufficiency is not only important in terms of equitable access to services and employment, but is also critical to the management of travel demand and the consequent sustainability of the regional transport system.
North-West Corridor Structure Plan
The current District Structure Plan has been prepared and assessed with reference to the 1992 N-W Corridor Structure Plan, although the Corridor Structure Plan has been under review for several years. This review has taken the form of an Interim Structure Plan (ISP) for the N-W Coastal Corridor, which has both informed and been informed by the two District Structure Plans for this area. The City has been closely involved in this review, having actively participated in two recent workshops and provided input into the latest draft of the ISP.
Council resolved, on 11 December 2007, “not to consider the adoption of the District Structure Plans for Yanchep-Two Rocks and Alkimos-Eglinton, until the regional transport and employment issues are been resolved”. However, these issues have since been considered during two workshops, one on Economic Development on 26 March 2008 at the City of Wanneroo, and the other on Transport Implications, on 30 April 2008, at the City of Joondalup. The proposed District Structure Plan reflects the outcomes of these workshops, although a number of studies associated with this review have yet to be completed, and the results of this review have yet to be endorsed by the WAPC or released for public comment.
At this stage it is unclear how long it will be before this process is finalised. There is an immediate requirement for a strategic planning framework to be put in place in the Yanchep Two Rocks district, considering the Council resolution on 11 December 2007, “to give consideration to the processing of some local structure plans in the area of the Coastal District Structure Plans”. Accordingly, it is considered that the consideration of the District Structure Plan should not be held up further, but that the Council should note the possibility of subsequent modifications in response to the outcomes of the current transport and economic studies and other changes raised in Attachment 3.
In the assessment of the District Structure Plan a precautionary approach has been adopted in regard to the regional transport and employment issues. Accordingly, further work on both these issues to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development is recommended, prior to the forwarding of the District Structure Plan to the WAPC. Depending on the final form and content of the ISP, there may be a need to make some modifications to the District Structure Plan, with reference to issues such as employment, road network, staging and developer contributions. Any such changes can be made through the process of WAPC endorsement of the District Structure Plan.
Statutory Compliance
Part 9 of DPS2 provides for the assessment and determination of Structure Plans, the preparation of which is the responsibility of the proponent (in this case a consortium of land owners). Pursuant to clause 9.4 of DPS2, following receipt of a proposed Structure Plan, the Council determined that the Structure Plan was generally satisfactory and approved it for the purposes of advertising subject to a number of specific modifications being made by the proponent prior to advertising and a number of other matters being addressed following advertising.
Subject to the satisfaction of the Council, and following advertisement of the draft District Structure Plan, the Council is now required to consider all submissions received and (in accordance with the clause 9.6 of the Scheme) may either:
(a) refuse to adopt the Structure Plan; or
(b) resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without modifications which the Council may make or require the proponent to make, and submit the Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for adoption and certification.
If the Council resolves to adopt the District Structure Plan, it is required to forward to the Commission:
(i) a schedule of submissions in respect of the structure plan and Council’s decisions or comments in relation to the submissions as appropriate;
(ii) Council recommendation to the Commission to adopt, modify or refuse to adopt the Structure Plan; and
(iii) any other information the Council considers may be relevant to the Commission in consideration of the Structure Plan.
Strategic Implications
The proposed DSP is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to progress the sustainable development of the City and increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options. Progressive implementation of the District Structure Plan will make a significant contribution to satisfying land and housing demand within the City as well as contributing to the needs of the Metropolitan Region as a whole over the next 20-25 years.
The proposed District Structure Plan is consistent with the following Outcome Objectives under the City’s Strategic Plan:
“1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment”;
“2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”; and
“3.1 Increase availability of serviced commercial and industrial land.”
Policy Implications
Approval and endorsement of the District Structure Plan will pave the way for staged development of the N-W corridor, and provide a policy framework for the assessment of Local Structure Plans and proposals to subdivide and develop land in the Yanchep-Two Rocks localities. There are six Draft Local Structure Plans currently being assessed by the City, which fall within the District Structure Plan area:
· Draft Structure Plan No. 54 – Capricorn Neighborhood Centre
· Draft Structure Plan No. 66 - South Yanchep
· Draft Structure Plan No. 67 - Lot 102 Yanchep Beach Road District Centre
· Draft Structure Plan No. 68 - St Andrews Regional Centre
· Draft Structure Plan No. 69 - Two Rocks
· Draft Structure Plan No. 70 – Two Rocks Town Centre
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority, except for Recommendation 2, which requires an absolute majority in accordance with the provisions of clause 8.6.1 of DPS2.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DETERMINES (pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2) that the proposed District Structure Plan is satisfactory subject to:
a) the modifications as recommended in Attachment 3 being made, except for the recommendations to prepare a District Staging Strategy as part of an Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan, and clause 7.11 of Part 1 (Attachment 4);
b) the recommendations in Attachment 3 to prepare a District Staging Strategy as part of an Economic, Employment and Community Development Plan, and clause 7.11 of Part 1 of the District Structure Plan (Attachment 4), being reviewed by the Director Planning and Sustainability in consultation with the proponent, and once reviewed those items forming part of the modifications to the proposed District Structure Plan through the mechanism referred to below in item 2 of this resolution; and
c) the Development Contribution Plan being agreed to, and signed, by all parties.
2. BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, and pursuant to the provision of clause 8.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2. DELEGATES authority to determine the details of the modifications referred to in item 1 above, to the Director Planning and Sustainability subject to agreement being reached with the proponents. In the event that agreement cannot be reached the matter is to be referred back to the Council for determination;
3. ADVISES the proponents of the determination in Items 1 and 2 above, and that the proponent is required to effect all required modifications and submit copies of the revised District Structure Plan to the City;
4. FORWARDS a copy of the revised District Structure Plan (when received and accepted by the Director Planning and Sustainability) together with the Schedule of Submissions in Attachment 3, to the Western Australian Planning Commission, in accordance with the provisions of Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No 2;
5. ACCEPTS the letter of undertaking received from the proponents, dated 14 July 2008, relating to the preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding between the proponent and the Council for implementation of the Development Contribution Plan;
6. ENDORSES the approach outlined in the letter referred to in Recommendation 5, above, with respect to the process to be followed in implementing the Development Contribution Plan; and
7. NOTES the current work being undertaken by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure as part of the review of the North West Corridor Structure Plan, and the possibility that this may lead to subsequent modifications to the District Structure Plan in the future.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 12
1. CONTEXT FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW
Under clause 9.4 of DPS No 2, following receipt of a proposed Structure Plan, the Council may do any of the following:
(a) determine that the Structure Plan is satisfactory, send a copy to the Commission, and advertise it under the provisions of Clause 9.5;
(b) determine that the Structure Plan is satisfactory and shall be advertised subject to specified modifications being made by the proponent or the Council and/or other specified matters being attended to by the proponent; or
(c) determine that the Structure Plan should not be agreed to for stated reasons.
While DPS-2 does not contain any specific criteria for the preliminary assessment of draft Structure Plans, it is desirable to ensure the scope of the Structure Plan is satisfactory and that any obvious deficiencies or outstanding issues can be addressed either prior to, or during advertising. Where a change to the draft Structure Plan is indicated in the preliminary assessment, or where there are matters which might need to be addressed further, a determination will need to be made as to whether this is required prior to advertising or can be undertaken after the commencement of the advertising period.
As with the procedure for other significant planning instruments such as local planning schemes and amendments, outstanding issues can (where necessary) be identified and highlighted in conjunction with the advertising of the draft Structure Plan, and this can sometimes avoid delay in progressing the proposal.
2. SCOPE OF PRELIMINARY REVIEW
The purpose of this preliminary review is to ascertain whether the draft DSP is complete and suitable for stakeholder referral and community consultation, and/or what (if any) issues need to be addressed prior to advertising and/or addressed in conjunction with advertising.
A listing of matters to be included in Structure Plans is included in Schedule 7 of DPS-2, although some of these appear to be directed towards Local Structure Plans and are clearly of a level of detail not appropriate to a District Structure Plan, e.g. indicative lot patterns and general location of major buildings.
As a general principle, the structural elements of a District Structure Plan should be limited to those of district-wide significance and/or which are necessary to guide the preparation of Local Structure Plans. These include:
§ District and regional access/movement network (road, pedestrian, cycle, public transport)
§ District and regional commercial and employment facilities (retail, services, industry)
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 12
§ Residential areas, including indicative residential densities
§ District and regional open space
§ Recreation and community facilities, including district level educational facilities (secondary and tertiary)
§ District and regional infrastructure (water services, communications, energy)
In addition to the above structural elements, the DSP should address implementation issues such as:
§ Staging of development (infrastructure, subdivision, services)
§ Achievement of developmental outcomes and targets (housing, employment, services, etc)
§ Funding of infrastructure/services/works, and any arrangements for developer contributions.
3. ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN PRELIMINARY REVIEW
The following is a list of issues, which has emerged from a preliminary review of the draft DSP. The list is not meant to be definitive, and further matters are likely to be raised prior to, as well as during the consultation/notification process.
1) Statutory provisions and relationship with TPS
2) Environmental conditions
3) Yanchep Structure Plan
4) Retail floorspace
5) Centre classification
6) Employment rationale
7) Industrial land allocation
8) Greenway Corridors
9) Coastal pedestrian pathway
10) Marinas and coastal resources
11) Development contributions (funding arrangements)
12) Compliance audit
13) General and editorial
14) Status and certification
The concerns relating to each of the issues are discussed briefly below, and are intended to provide the basis for further discussion by the steering group, and (if necessary) modification of the draft DSP prior to advertising.
4. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Statutory provisions and explanatory text
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 12
The draft DSP is presented in two parts and is accompanied by six technical reports (which are not referenced in the contents list of either Part, but are referred to as comprising Volume 2 of Part 2 in clause 2.0 - Structure Plan Content - in Part 1).
§ Part 1 is entitled “Statutory Provisions” and includes the Structure Plan (Map) and two pages of statutory provisions.
§ Part 2 is entitled “Explanatory Text” and includes background information, a summary of the relevant technical reports (Volume 2) and an exposition of the Structure Plan as proposed (Section 5).
The Statutory Provisions of Part 1 express the relationship between the DSP and the Scheme and with the Explanatory Text in the following terms:
The provisions, standards and requirements specified under Part 1 of this Structure Plan shall have the same force and effect as if it were a provision, standard or requirement of the Scheme. Part 2 of this Structure Plan is for explanatory purposes only, in order to provide a descriptive analysis of the Structure Plan;
The Zoning Map and Residential Density Code Maps delineate and depict the zones, reserves and residential density codes applicable to the land according to the legend thereon;
The zones, reserves and residential density codes designated under this Structure Plan apply to the land within it as if the zones, reserves and residential density codes were incorporated in the Scheme; and
The permissibility of uses in the Urban Development Zone, subject to subclauses 9.8.2 and 9.8.3, of the Scheme shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the relevant Agreed Structure Plan.
In the event there are no ‘zones, reserves or residential density codes’ shown on the Structure Plan, although the Map legend does refer to uses, and some (not all) of these correspond to the zoning nomenclature used in the Scheme. In addition there are no provisions of the DSP which address ‘permissibility of uses’ in the Urban Development zone.
The foregoing provisions are a duplication of provisions of TPS-2 (9.8) under which Structure Plans are given effect. The Statutory Provisions also purport to override the existing statutory requirements for amendments to Structure Plans under TPS-2 (9.7), in the following terms:
. . . certain elements of the DSP may be varied at the LSP stage, with appropriate justification, to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo and WAPC, without requiring a
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 4 of 12
formal amendment to the DSP that would otherwise be required by Clause 9.7 of the City of Wanneroo District Town Planning Scheme No 2.
However, the Scheme sets out the procedure for any amendments to structure plans, and these would take precedence over any provisions of the Structure Plan which purport to circumvent the formal amendment procedures.
The Structure Plan needs to set out the principles and objectives of the plan as well as the developmental targets and requirements, and this should form part of the DSP. While much of this information is included in Section 5 of the main report, the bulk of the explanatory text in the other sections is peripheral to the DSP proper.
There is a need to re-cast the various sections of the DSP Report so as to make it clear which are to be adopted as the District Structure Plan and which are to be referenced as Explanatory Text. Although it is not necessary for any fundamental change to be made prior to advertising, a recasting of the current statutory provisions prior to advertising would be desirable, with a more comprehensive consolidation of the DSP to be addressed during the advertising period.
Recommended Modification:
(1) That Part 1 (Statutory Provisions) of the draft DSP be revised by removal of those provisions which are already contained in DPS No 2, and clarification of the core proposals of the DSP. Refer Attachment B
(2) That the proponent be requested to undertake a comprehensive consolidation of the DSP during the advertising period, so as to clarify those elements which are intended for endorsement as the DSP proper, and those which comprise background material. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.2 Environmental Conditions
The environmental assessment of DPS No 2 included a number of environmental conditions, and which include a requirement that:
At the District and Local Structure Planning Stage, the landowner shall review existing geotechnical information and undertake further site investigations to confirm the nature and extent of karst landform within the amendment area.
Since the imposition of the above condition, there has been liaison with the City and DEC, culminating in a proposal by the proponent’s environmental consultant for a staged assessment of the karst. The basis of this was a district level assessment of the first three stages of the development prior to lodgement of the DSP, with subsequent and more detailed assessment being undertaken in conjunction with local structure plans.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 5 of 12
The results of the District level assessment was to have been discussed within the DSP, but at the time of preparation of the Structure Plan, the outcome of the assessment had still to be finalized and agreed. This is a matter which can be addressed during the course of advertising, with such additional information as may be required being included in the final documentation.
Recommendation:
That the proponent be requested to include such additional information about the kast assessment as may be required in the DSP prior to finalisation. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.3 Yanchep Structure Plan
Section 3 of the DPS report includes reference to the North-West Corridor Plan and the Yanchep Structure Plan, which was prepared as an addendum to the Corridor Structure Plan. However, there is no copy of either the N-W Corridor Structure Plan or the Yanchep Plan in the report. Furthermore there is no discussion as to how the current DSP compares with the earlier plan.
This is a similar situation to that which was identified for the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP, where the proponent was required to include this material in the advertised draft.
Recommended Modification:
That the draft DSP be modified to address the issue of compliance with (or departure from) the N-W Corridor Structure Plan and Yanchep Structure Plan, and relevant illustration of the plans be included in section 1 or 3 of the main DSP report.
4.4 Retail Floorspace Allocation
The rationale for allocation of retail expenditure and consequent distribution of retail floorspace among centres is not clear from either the DSP report or the supplementary technical report prepared by Urbis-JHD. However, it is apparent the allocation has been based on a modelling of consumer expenditure and the results indicate this has been based on turnover per unit floorspace criteria.
In the event, the allocation of retail floorspace to local/neighbourhood centres is less than one-third of that specified under the Wanneroo Centres Strategy, which has implications for the services available at the local/neighbourhood level and therefore the self-sufficiency and accessibility of convenience retail services. This is a similar result to that derived for the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP.
The Retail Assessment report seeks to explain the variation in the following terms:
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 6 of 12
‘Detailed planning can be expected to identify appropriate locations for local corner stores and sub-local centres which are expected to result in a per capita floorspace provision broadly consistent with the aims of the Wanneroo Centre Strategy.’
Such an outcome seems unlikely, as it would involve around twice the floorspace (and twice the household expenditure) being allocated to corner stores and sub-local centres as has been allocated to Neighbourhood centres. However, there is no necessity to resolve this issue prior to advertising.
Recommendation:
That the proponent be requested to clarify the basis for retail floorspace allocation, and to consider the practicability and implications of a greater allocation of retail floorspace at the local-neighbourhood level in accordance with the City’s Local Commercial Strategy. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.5 Centre Classification
The centre hierarchy identified in the DSP does not appear to relate to function (and size) of centres as detailed in the Retail Assessment report by Urbis JHD. For example District Centre H has a total floor area of 10,537 m2 (incl 3700 retail) whereas Neighbourhood Centre M has a total floor area of 17,098 m2 (incl 4,700 retail).
This is not so much a problem with the centre size but rather reflects a disparity between the classification and the functional analysis in the associated technical report. However, as with the issue of floorspace allocation, this is a matter which can be addressed during the course of advertising.
Recommendation:
That the proponent be requested to review the basis for classification of Activity Centres, with reference to their size, function and composition, and where appropriate to amend the classification to accord with current practice in Western Australia or justify departures from the existing classification criteria. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.6 Employment Rationale
Neither the DSP report nor the accompanying technical report (Economic Development) appear to include any explanation as to how non-retail floorspace and associated employment has been derived and allocated to the various centres. In addition, while the reports nominate employment numbers and locations, they do not provide any basis with reference to either need or demand for such development.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 7 of 12
The viability of such ancillary development is critical to the overall employment strategy, and therefore the level of self-sufficiency and associated assumptions concerning transport and travel demand and associated traffic projections. While the non-retail floorspace associated with retail development appears to correspond roughly (not consistently) with the regional averages available from the Commercial survey 2001-02, there is a major difference from the regional averages for the Strategic Regional Centre (Centre A). In this instance, nearly 35% of total floorspace has been allocated to Office/Business, which compares with a region-wide average for this class of centre of just under 19%.
The District Centres also have a significantly larger Office/Business component than the regional average, having just over 20% of the total floorspace compared with the Metropolitan-wide average of just over 17% for this class of centre, i.e. 17.5% higher than the average.
Given the assumption underlying the Office/Business component for the District Centres it is unclear why a significantly larger Office component was not proposed for the northern Regional centre (Centre B). The allocation of Office/Business floorspace to this centre amounts to some 20% of the total floorspace or 22% of the overall commercial floorspace (excluding residential), which is not significantly greater than the region-wide average for this class of centre.
The proposed Office/Business floorspace component for the Neighbourhood Centres averages 10%, which compares with around 20% for this class of centre in the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP. This is not to say that 20% is necessarily ‘the right’ figure, and it appears this allocation for Alkimos-Eglinton has been based on Metropolitan-wide averages of all complexes other than Regional and District. It is doubtful whether this breakdown is reflective of Neighbourhood Centres.
Recommendation:
The proponent be advised that clarification of methodology (and if necessary further work) needs to be provided in relation to the Economic and Employment Reports so as to provide satisfactory assurances as to the need and/or demand for the proposed floorspace and employment allocations.
(There is no necessity to resolve this issue prior to advertising, and similar work will also be required for the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP.)
4.7 Industrial Land Allocation
Neither the DSP report nor any of the accompanying technical reports appear to include any rationale for allocation of land to industry. Unfortunately there is not much guidance at the regional level as to how much land is required for industry or the extent to which industrial and commercial development need to be segregated.
The DSP report describes the allocation of land for industry in the following terms:
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 8 of 12
Two industrial zones are proposed to service the northern and southern sectors of the DSP area. southern sectors of the DSP area.
§ The southern industrial area is isolated from residential neighbourhoods and enjoys good highway access, will be suited to general industry and large-scale warehousing and distribution uses.
§ The northern area, which enjoys proximity to a district centre and is surrounded by mixed-use neighbourhoods, will be more suited to smaller-scale, light industrial, warehousing, storage and service industries that are needed to service the local population.
* * * *
It is specifically intended that these zones, as reflected in the provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme, will not contain any non-industrial uses that can be readily integrated into the general urban areas. This is particularly important given recent trends for non-industrial uses to locate in land set aside for industry, which is contributing to an increasing shortage of land suitable for bona fide industrial activities.
It is debatable whether this conventional approach to industrial planning is appropriate for a development with such a long time frame as Yanchep-Two Rocks. While the service industry component would appear to be justified, it is not so clear what the future demand might be for so called bone fide industrial activity, or whether such development belongs within the Yanchep-Two Rocks area. These issues can be discussed further during the course of advertising, with input particularly from Landcorp and DPI.
Recommendation:
The proponent be advised that further justification needs to be provided in relation to the amount, location and nature of industry to be provided for under the DSP. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.8 Greenway Corridors
Section 5.7 (Public Realm) of the main report, identifies ‘greenway corridors’ as a key component of the DSP, proposing that:
. . . these linear corridors will connect and form part of the site’s neighbourhoods, and link homes and workplaces to the coast, the eastern parklands and to major facilities and services. In this regard they connect playing fields, education facilities, activity centres, drainage corridors and industrial buffers and link into neighbourhood streets that are designed for pedestrians and cyclists. They will also define strategic pedestrian entry points to the eastern and northern parklands and coastal reserve.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 9 of 12
While the DSP Plan includes a network of such green links, in a number of instances these do not appear to provide the connectivity referred to in the report, while the spacing such linkages to the coast at almost 3 km seems somewhat excessive. The issue of green links was also raised in relation to the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP, where the proponent was required to undertake further work on this during the advertising period, and a similar approach is suggested for the Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP.
Recommendation:
That the proponent be requested to review the extent and connectivity of the proposed green links, so as to ensure an integrated network of such facilities including convenient linkages to the coastal reserves. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.9 Coastal pedestrian pathway
Section 5.9.2.5 (Non-motorised travel) of the main report, outlines a range of facilities for cycling and walking, which are generally to be provided in conjunction with the street network. However, of particular significance in terms of the regional and district pedestrian and cycle network, is the proposal for:
A regional recreational path . . . along the entire ocean frontage of Yanchep-Two Rocks.
This proposal mirrors the foreshore pathway proposed in the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP, but is currently not highlighted on the DSP Plan (as was required for Alkimos-Eglinton).
Recommendation:
That the coastal pathway referred to in the main report be illustrated on the DSP (Plan), as an element of district significance in terms of the movement-access network.
4.10 Marinas and coastal resources
Two ‘Potential’ new marinas have been identified on the DSP, and in the absence of any environmental (coastal process) assessment, it is reasonable to assume that the development of these facilities would be subject to subsequent detailed assessment and approval with reference particularly to coastal processes. The DSP (Plan) includes no reference to beach classification, although this is addressed in the accompanying Coastal Facilities report.
Given the significance of the foreshore and beach as both a resource and a destination for district and regional recreation, proposals concerning the use and classification of the foreshore should be included in the DSP. Such a requirement was imposed on the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP, and might in the present circumstances include not only the beach classification but also the two significant surf breaks (The Spot and Derrs) which have been
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 10 of 12
identified in the accompanying technical report. One of these two surf breaks (Derrs) has not been shown on the Beach Hierarchy Plan (Figure 22) of the main DSP report, and this should be remedied at the same time.
Recommended Modification:
That the beach classification (local/district) shown on the plan in the Coastal Facilities report (Figure 2.2) together with the two surf-breaks referred to in that report (The Spot and Derrs) be included in the DSP and on the Beach Hierarchy Plan at Figure 22 of the main DSP report.
4.11 Development Contributions
The DSP currently recognises the role of a Developer Contributions Scheme (DCS) in relation to the funding of shared infrastructure, but concludes that in the present circumstances cost-sharing arrangements can be appropriately managed and implemented through direct negotiations and legal agreements between the landowners and relevant agencies.
However, it is not clear from the report at what stage such agreements would need to be finalised, and there are a number of infrastructure items excluded from the funding arrangements table in section 5.10. Unless cost sharing arrangements and proportional contributions are finalised prior to local structure planning and subdivision there is likely to be uncertainty and confusion as to when and how much contributions are to be payable.
In addition to the current items of infrastructure included in the DSP, shared infrastructure which might be expected to be included as part of developer contributions include:
§ Foreshore management plan and associated foreshore works
§ Other ROS developmental works
§ Regional and district pedestrian and cycle paths
§ District and regional (part) recreational facilities
§ District community facilities
§ District public transport facilities and operation.
Recommended Modification:
That the list of infrastructure and funding arrangements included in section 5.10 be expanded to include the above facilities and works, and that during the advertising period, additional information be provided as to the timing and assurances of infrastructure contributions.
4.12 Compliance Audit
In the case of the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP a formal compliance audit was requested by DPI officers, and the City imposed this as a prerequisite to advertising. This requirement was not recommended in the original Preliminary Assessment report, but emerged in discussion at the
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 11 of 12
meeting with DPI officers. Although Alkimos-Eglinton proponent has completed this work, it appears to have been an onerous task, and it is debatable whether it should have been required as a prerequisite to advertising.
Recommendation:
That a formal compliance audit not be required prior to advertisement of the draft DSP, but that the proponent be requested to provide an assessment of compliance against all of the relevant statutory and policy instruments. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.13 General Editorial
The draft DSP report contains numerous editorial deficiencies and a significant amount of material which adds little to, and arguably confuses, some of the more substantive components of the DSP. While some of this material may be acceptable as part of the self-promotional element of the DSP, this is not the case for some other parts of the text.
Examples of such material are to be found in Section 5 (District Structure Plan), from which the following excerpts have been taken:
Over the past 50 years or so, growth in the metropolitan region has been characterised by planning which has largely showed little regard for the environmental, economic and social implications of development.
* * * * * *
Within a short period of time, the entire suburban development system had become codified and standardised the world over – the professions became obsessed with “capacity” at the expense of “character”.
What planners did not foresee was the outcome that would result from the endless repetition of this pattern. Instead of roads moving people swiftly from home to work to play, they became clogged with traffic. . . . . Even the simplest errands become frustrating and time-consuming experiences.
* * * * * *
Thankfully, policy-makers and the built environment professions are now making a concerted effort to re-establish the wisdom of the past.
The foregoing critique appears to be both subjective and pejorative, and it is not immediately apparent that the current proposal represents such a radical change from past planning practice or is reflective of any particular wisdom of the past. By way of example, the design parameters for the ‘pedestrian-friendly’ main North-South Boulevard (Mixed-Use Corridor) include:
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 12 of 12
§ 6 lanes of road traffic (four carriageways) with associated cycle lanes and 2 local (service) roads with associated on-street parking;
§ Operating speeds for the through traffic of 50-60 km/h;
§ Road-traffic volume of between 35,000 and 38,000 vpd;
§ Central (public) transit facility;
§ Total width of (transport) boulevard of 61 metres.
There are a number of other editorial issues, which need to be addressed, and this can be done during the advertising period. These include discrepancies in statistical information (population, floorspace) and improvements in the Structure of section 5 of the DSP report.
Recommendation:
That the text of the DSP report be reviewed by the consultant, with a view to addressing any editorial discrepancies, and removing any unnecessary material concerning the historical state of planning in the western world. (To be undertaken during the advertising period.)
4.14 Status and certification
The DSP report includes a Certification page, which provides for the recording of its adoption by the WAPC and the Council, and while the adoption dates are left blank, there may be a misunderstanding that the substance of the document has some degree of endorsement by these agencies.
This situation is the same as that which was originally proposed for the Alkimos-Eglinton DSP, where the consultants were requested to replace this page, with text along the following lines:
This Structure Plan has been prepared and submitted to Council for approval to advertise pursuant to the provisions of Part 9 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2
On behalf of Landcorp, Eglinton Estates Pty Ltd, WR Carpenter Landholdings, Alkimos Lot 101 Joint Venture
Recommended Modification:
That the certification page of the draft DSP report be replaced by a new Title Page at the front of the document which clarifies the status of the proposed DSP.
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0117V01
File Name: BA Amendment No 1 Hocking Neighbourhood Centre Structure Plan No 42.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Aiton Sheppard
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider comments in response to further community consultation and to determine the amendment of the Hocking Neighbourhood Structure Plan No 42 (SP 42)
Applicant |
Taylor Robinson Architects |
Owner |
Ho Chan Unit Trust |
Location |
Lot 20 (176) Nicholas Road, Hocking |
Site Area |
1.9ha |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development and R40 |
Background
The City approved application DA06/0172 for the construction of a shopping centre in May 2006. That design was consistent with SP 42 and provided ‘mainstreet’ frontage to the Gungurru Avenue / Wyatt Road intersection at the north-eastern corner of Lot 20. The property has changed hands and the new owner wishes to design a centre suitable for a full line Woolworths supermarket. Planning application DA08/0344 has been submitted for this (refer Attachment 1).
Council considered this matter at its meeting on 26 August, 2008 (PD01-08/08) and resolved that the matter be referred back to the Administration for further consultation.
Detail
The applicant submits that the centre approved under DA06/0172 is not commercially sustainable. The site, in the heart of a residential area, is bounded on three sides by low density housing, and to the west there is a medium density housing site. Further west is a primary school site. The owner has been negotiating the establishment of a full line supermarket, and has advised that the SP 42 requirement for mainstreet frontage, is an impediment to the proposed centre’s viability. Application is therefore being made for planning approval to redesign the centre, and an amendment of SP 42 is necessary to accommodate the changes that are proposed.
Consultation
Following the receipt of DA08/0344 in April, 2008, the City’s Smart Growth and Infrastructure Planning officers have had numerous meetings with the applicant. During this time the design has been modified to resolve issues of concern to the officers. It was then necessary for the applicant to apply for an amendment of SP 42.
Amendment No 1 (refer Attachment 2) was prepared and advertised for public comment for a period of 28 days. At the conclusion of public advertising five submissions were received.
Submission 1 raises concerns about traffic and the deletion of a roundabout at the Gungurru/Wyatt intersection. It suggests that the design should be reversed so that the proposed parking area is adjacent to Nicholas Road.
Response. Although roundabouts are illustrated on plans accompanying the amendment documents at Attachment 2, they are outside the structure plan area. The intersection of Gungurru Avenue and Wyatt Road is not a four-way intersection and as such a roundabout is not required to facilitate traffic movement. A condition of approval for the proposed centre will require the developer to provide a median island within Gungurru Avenue at no cost to the City to assist in the management of traffic along this road. Gungurru Avenue is the main road link to Wanneroo Road and therefore is more appropriate than Nicholas Road to have parking adjacent to it. It should also be noted that the shopping centre design includes access to each of the three adjacent streets, as was the case in the City’s original approval. A traffic impact and management report has been prepared by the applicant in support of the proposal.
Submission 2 prefers the establishment of a smaller independent supermarket and more speciality shops, rather than the full line supermarket and fewer speciality shops that are now being proposed.
Response. This is a commercial decision as the applicant believes that speciality shops have more ability to survive with a full line supermarket as the anchor tenant. The total retail nett lettable area of the new centre must comply with the maximum 4250 sqm specified in SP 42. This is not changed by the amendment, neither has the requirement for both residential and commercial components to be included in the centre.
Following Council’s resolution, a further 14 day period of community consultation has taken place through letters to all residents within a 400 metre radius of the subject site. Only three submissions were received as a result. For continuity, these are numbered 3 to 5 below.
Submission 3 expresses concern about the impact of traffic on Gungurru Avenue.
Submission 4 does not favour the two storey residential component and would prefer more shops.
Submission 5 does not favour the commercial/residential mix on grounds that traffic, parking demand and anti social behaviour may be increased. The submission also states that neither Gungurru Avenue or Wyatt Road can cater for kerbside parking.
Response. Responses to the latter three submissions are similar to the responses to the original two submissions. There is, however, no evidence that a residential component will increase traffic and anti-social behaviour, and reduce parking. On the contrary a residential presence is likely to increase surveillance within the centre after hours, and the dwellings must comply with the R40 Residential Design Code.
Smart Growth Strategy
The proposal is consistent with Principle 5.2, the effective use of land and infrastructure for the benefit of the local area. This is achieved by supporting commercial and residential developments that support community facilities, commercial facilities and public transport systems.
Comment
The proposal will provide for the daily needs shopping of the neighbourhood in a planned mixed use centre which also includes an R40 residential component and provision for home and small business. It is understood that the small, full-line Woolworths supermarket has been attracted to this site because Woolworths is not represented in the new Wanneroo Town Centre.
The main purpose of the amendment (refer Attachment 2) is to remove the need for mainstreet frontage at the north eastern corner of the subject site. This is compensated for by the provision of a landmark building across the corner and it will be noted from Attachment 1, that Wyatt Road has speciality shops fronting it and that residential development will front onto Nicholas Road. Consequently the proposed ‘big box’ supermarket is either set back from surrounding streets or will be reasonably screened from view at street level, thereby reducing its impact.
The orientation of the existing site, includes three road frontages, which does not easily accommodate pedestrian interface on all boundaries and it is technically difficult to accommodate the necessary floor area of the development and effectively contain parking and service areas. The creation of a mainstreet development on this site would lack a number of essential design elements, including a balanced built form, which should include zero lot line development on opposite sides of the road and a pedestrian friendly road interface and therefore the amendment to the structure plan is considered to be acceptable in this instance.
Statutory Compliance
The Hocking / Pearsall localities are within the area of Agreed Structure Plan No 6 for East Wanneroo Cell 4 (ASP 6). Notations on ASP 6 plans refer to SP 42 for the detailed design requirements of the neighbourhood centre. A prerequisite to the approval of DA08/0344 is approval of Amendment No 1 of SP 42. As the general public has had the opportunity to view and comment on the amendment documents and the plans for the new centre, it is submitted that subject to the approval of the amendment in accordance with part 9.8.1 of the scheme, DA08/0344 may be considered under delegated authority.
Strategic Implications
The proposed redesign of the Hocking Neighbourhood Centre will be consistent with ASP 6 and with SP 42 if Council approves Amendment No 1. This is consistent with Outcome Objective 2.1 of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021, namely to:
“Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options.”
Policy Implications
The proposal is not consistent with the Centres Strategy, which promotes mainstreet principles. In this particular case the mainstreet frontage at the Gungurru/Wyatt corner only is somewhat ad hoc and there is a case for it to be relaxed. The proposal is, however, consistent with the policy, in so far as the new design is attempting a viable mixed use development in an attractive centre that will provide a community focus.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 1 to the Hocking Neighbourhood Centre Agreed Structure Plan No 42, as submitted by Taylor Robinson Architects on behalf of Ho Chan Unit Trust and as outlined in Attachment 2 to this report is satisfactory and SUBMITS three copies to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification;
2. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS Amendment No. 1 to the Agreed Structure Plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
3. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on this Structure Plan Amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P34/2148V06
File Name: EA DA08 0657 Sale of Cooked Fish and Hot Potato Chips Lot 810 1397 Wanneroo Road Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Aiton Sheppard
Meeting Date: 23 September, 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider whether or not the sale of cooked fish and hot potato chips is permissible in a “Growers Mart” development.
Applicant |
Raymond Jackson |
Owner |
Goldrange Pty Ltd |
Location |
Lot 810 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
2.8 hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
General Rural |
Background
The Drovers Place Precinct Structure Plan No 47 (SP 47) was approved on 5 November 2007. It defines the term “Growers Mart” which is one of the land uses permitted on Lot 810. Lot 810 and the adjacent Lot 811 are within the Restricted Use Precinct of SP 47. On 21 November 2007 the City approved DA07/0804 to change the use of Lot 810 from Rural Industry to Growers Mart. The subject land is illustrated by Attachment 1.
Detail
The applicant describes the proposal as a “clarification of useage”, and describes the nature of the existing buildings and land use as “growers mart as defined under LS 47”. A reduced photocopy of the plan accompanying the application, “Proposed Fish Shop Layout” is included at Attachment 2.
Clarification of the proposal was requested from the applicant who has replied as follows:
“1) Proposed to sell cooked fish and if requested, hot potato chips will be cooked and supplied with the fish on request – no food on display;
2) Not intended to be consumed on the premises. Wrapped/container of fish (and chips) will be supplied;
3) Potato chips to be supplied by the Fruit & Vegie Mart on site;
4) Salads supplied by Fruit &Vegie Mart on site.”
Consultation
No consultation was required to be undertaken.
Smart Growth Strategy
The type of development that is taking place at Lot 810 has implications for the City’s Smart Growth Strategy that should not be overlooked. The Review of the Centres Policy is well advanced, and will reinforce the benefits of planned, appropriately located activity centres, providing a mix of retail, office and entertainment developments in close proximity to where people live.
Comment
The City’s planning officers are becoming increasingly concerned about the development of Lot 810 because the individual activities that are establishing, go beyond what is permissible under the restrictive provisions of SP 47. The result is that an intensive retail/wholesale food centre is evolving at a location that is not an identified activity centre.
It should be noted that Lot 810 is restricted by definition (see Statutory Compliance section below) to the sale of primary products, and these may include fruit, vegetables, meat, fish and bread. The bakery or patisserie that has been established does far more than simply sell bread, The proposal to sell fish and chips will involve the cooking of primary products to produce a secondary product. The applicant has argued that all these activities are incidental to the functions of the growers mart, whereas it is considered they function as shops that would be more appropriate in planned activity centres. In this regard, the ‘Growers Mart’ is intended to provide a support role to the designated activity centres such as the Wanneroo Town Centre and Carramar Neighbourhood Centre, which have commercial zones in place and are identified in the City of Wanneroo Centres Strategy for the accommodation of retail uses. The introduction of the ‘sale of cooked fish and hot potato chips’ (which could otherwise be considered as a shop or takeaway food) within structure plan 47 would directly compete with other designated centres and undermine the integrity of the ‘growers mart’ land use definition.
If the City does not carefully control the various activities at Lot 810 to the sale of primary products, including fruit, vegetables, meat, fish and bread, and nothing more, it will weaken the outcome of its centres strategy review and the hierarchy of planned activity centres for commercial, business and industrial purposes, that should result in appropriate locations.
Statutory Compliance
Until the Rural zoning of the land in SP 47 is changed through the Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1155/57 and concurrent rezoning to Urban Development under the City’s District Scheme 2, there will be a conflict between the provisions of SP 47 and the schemes. When the zoning changes SP 47 will provide the development control for the Drovers Place Precinct.
An objective of SP 47 (subclause 7.1a) is to provide a flexible planning framework that is responsive to “a range of suitable development and land use options”. Clause 7.1 goes on to state that Industrial and Commercial development is not considered to be suitable in SP 47.
Lot 810 is within the Restricted Use Precinct of SP 47. Subclause 7.2.1 deals with the permissibility of land use, which is restricted (in the case of Lot 810) to a growers mart which means “any land or buildings used for the wholesale distribution and retail sale of primary products including fruit and vegetables, meat, fish and bread”.
Strategic Implications
The proposal, which basically amounts to a fish and chips shop, is contrary to the provisions of SP 47. If it is approved the City will come under pressure to support other similar uses, e.g. a kebab shop as part of the meat sales. In not supporting the application, the City will be satisfying its obligations under Part 4.7 of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, which specifies, “maintain a high standard of governance and accountability” and Part 3.4, which specifies, “Improve the viability and profile of rural industry”. In this regard, the refusal of the application would ensure that the intended use of the land for ‘Growers Mart’ is maintained and not undermined or eroded through the introduction of ‘take away food’ or ‘shops’.
Policy Implications
Implication associated with the City’s Centres Strategy have been previously discussed within this report.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council REFUSES the application dated 4 July, 2008, by Raymond Jackson on behalf of Goldrange Pty Ltd, to sell cooked fish and hot potato chips from premises on Lot 810 (1397) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo on the grounds that this is not one of the uses specified in the Restricted Use Precinct of the Drovers Place Precinct Agreed Structure Plan No 47.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P34/1966V01
File Name: EA Development Application Unit 3A 925 Wanneroo Road Wanneroo Proposed Bikini Girls Massage .doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Michael Hudson
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for a ‘Bikini Girls Massage’ business.
Applicant |
Define Creations on behalf of Bon Levi |
Owner |
Gemworth Pty Ltd & Lansden Holdings Pty Ltd |
Location |
Unit 3A, 925 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
0.34 m2 |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Centre |
Background
The subject property forms part of an existing building at 925 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo (refer Attachment 1). The applicant originally applied for a service retail use, however, the description did not reasonably cover the intended use of the premises, which relates to body massage therapy. The City subsequently received legal advice in regard to the classification of the use and it has been advised that the proposal is best considered as an ‘unlisted use’, in accordance with the provisions of the scheme.
In accordance with Part 3.3 of DPS2 – ‘Unlisted Uses’, Council will need to either:
(a) determine that the use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the particular zone and is therefore permitted; or
(b) determine that the proposed use may be consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone and thereafter follow the “D” procedures of Clause 6.6.2 in considering an application for planning approval; or
(c) determine that the use is not consistent with the objectives and purposes of the particular zone and is therefore not permitted.
Detail
The applicant has advised that the proposed use would involve a massage service for males utilising the Swedish/Bowen therapy technique, which is a deep tissue massage for treating the nervous system of the back and legs. The therapist is a trained contractor and is required to enter into an agreement with the operator prohibiting the performance of any sexual service. The massage is a relaxation style massage and the masseuse wears a bikini at all times. The customer is required to cover their private parts at all times with a towel. The business will have incidental sales of massage oils and other cosmetics for males. There will be three cubicles with massage tables.
Consultation
Administration has not entered into consultation with adjoining or nearby residents at this time, however should Council determine that the proposed use ‘may’ be consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone then consultation is recommended in accordance with the procedures of Clause 6.6.2 of the Scheme.
Smart Growth Strategy
Nil
Comment
The subject land is located within the Wanneroo Road West Precinct and has a ‘Business Classification’ under the Wanneroo Town Centre Local Structure Plan (Structure Plan 23), which was adopted on 4 May 2001.
Pursuant to clause 7.7 of Structure Plan 23, the definitions of land uses shall be those used in the Scheme. The City has received legal advice indicating that the proposed use of the premises does not fall within any of the use classes mentioned in the scheme and that the closest possible use class definition is ‘consulting rooms’, which is a permitted use within the Wanneroo Road West Precinct. However, it was further advised that the proposed use is unlikely to constitute a ‘consulting room’ as there may be more than one masseuse operating at any one time and that the ‘relaxation style massage’ is unlikely to constitute the ‘investigation and treatment of human injuries or ailments’. Accordingly, the proposal should be assessed as a use not listed.
In accordance with Part 3.3 of DPS2 – ‘Unlisted Uses’, Council will need to either:
(a) determine that the use is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the particular zone and is therefore permitted; or
(b) determine that the proposed use may be consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone and thereafter follow the “D” procedures of Clause 6.6.2 in considering an application for planning approval; or
(c) determine that the use is not consistent with the objectives and purposes of the particular zone and is therefore not permitted.
The Wanneroo Road West Precinct defines a ‘Statement of Intent’, which identifies the following as the intent and desirable nature of development/use within this area, “This precinct provides a transition between busy Wanneroo Road and established residential development to the west. It also supports the overall development of the Town Centre as a business centre. Existing education establishments, Wanneroo Primary and Junior Primary Schools, need to be consolidated for the enhanced delivery of educational services. Current school land adjoining Wanneroo Road will be developed for business. The remaining land from the consolidation of educational establishments will be used for medium density residential development”.
Part 3.6.1 of the City’s Scheme specifies that the Business Zone is intended “to accommodate warehouses, showrooms, trade and professional services and small scale complementary and incidental retailing uses, as well as providing for retail and commercial businesses which require large areas such as bulky goods and category/theme-based retail outlets that provide for the needs of the community but which due to their nature are generally not appropriate to or cannot be accommodated in a commercial area”.
Part 3.6.2 of the Scheme defines the objectives of the Business Zone are to:
“(a) provide for retail and commercial businesses, which require large areas such as bulky goods and category/theme based retail outlets as well as complementary business services;
(b) ensure that development within this zone creates an attractive façade to the street for the visual amenity of surrounding areas.”
The intent of the Structure Plan 23 is to provide a ‘transition’ between busy Wanneroo Road and established residential development to the west and provide for complementary business services. Given ‘Consulting Rooms’ is considered to be the closest use class definition in the Scheme to the proposed use and is a permitted use, it is possible that the ‘Bikini Girl Massage’ is a use that may be consistent with the objectives of the zone ,and as such, should be determined in accordance with part 3.3(b) of the Scheme, which specifies “the proposed use may be consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone and thereafter follow the “D” procedures of Clause 6.6.2 in considering an application for planning approval”.
In this regard, Part 6.6.2 of the Scheme specifies that, “Council in exercising its discretion as to the approval or refusal of an application for Planning Approval, shall have regard to the provisions of Clause 6.8. If in any particular case Council considers that it would be appropriate to consult with the public generally or with the owners or occupiers of properties adjoining or in the vicinity of a site the subject of an application for Planning Approval involving a “D” use, the Council may direct that the provisions of Clause 6.7 shall apply to that application”.
It should be noted, that despite the advice provided by the applicant that the massage contractors would not engage in sexual relations with the client, the nature of the use may be perceived as a ‘sexual services business’ by the community and prospective clientele because female contractors would only be wearing bikinis. In this regard, it would be difficult for the City to ensure that no sexual service activity is occurring as part of this operation, particularly given the massage treatment occurs within private cubicles. It is also noted that the nature of the use may have a detrimental impact on nearby residential properties, which exist approximately 20 metres to the west of the land. It is also noted that the applicant has not provided any details in relation to hours of operation, which could be limited to normal office hours to minimise any impact on adjoining landowners, should the application be supported.
Statutory Compliance
Consideration of the application has been made in accordance Part 3.3 of District Planning Scheme Number 2 for an unlisted use.
Strategic Implication
The proposal may be consistent with Objective 3.6 of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 to:
“Increase support for new and existing business.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council in accordance with Part 3.3 of the scheme DETERMINES that the application for a ‘Bikini Girl Massage’ business at Unit 3A, 925 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo submitted by Define Creations on behalf of Bon Levi may be consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone and ADVERTISE the proposal in accordance with the procedures defined in Part 6.7 of the scheme.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P12/0015V01
File Name: EA Category 3 Home Business Proposed Civil Engineering Operation No 8 Lot 212 Tuscan Way Gnangara.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Warren Andersen
Meeting Date: 26 August 2008
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application to operate a Civil Engineering business.
Applicant |
D and T Booth |
Owner |
D and T Booth |
Location |
No. 8 (Lot 212) Tuscan Way, Gnangara |
Site Area |
1.1307 Hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Special Rural |
Background
The subject lot is located within a Special Rural 05 Zone – Lakelands Estate, Gnangara (refer Attachment 1).
The application entails an office within an existing dwelling, an external shed, a truck and excavator, and a concrete storage area for materials.
The site has been subject to two previous complaints lodged with the Council. A complaint (AR 201168) received in July 2005 relates to more than one truck operating onsite. This was resolved with the City’s compliance officer. In October 2007, a complaint (AR 239499) was received about an unauthorised ‘Home Business’ use. This prompted lodgement of a development application received 6 December 2007.
The application was previously submitted to Council on 6 June 2008, with an administration recommendation that the application be refused. At this meeting (report PD05-06/08), Council resolved to refer the application back to administration for further investigation. The applicant has now provided some additional information and advice in regard to a scaling down of the operation, this information has been included into this report.
Detail
The applicant has submitted the following information in support of this proposal:
1. The business use comprises of (a) 20 square metre office within an existing dwelling, (b) 135 square metre shed, and (c) a 54 square metre shed, and a 50 square metre concrete hardstand for storage of materials (refer Attachment 2).
2. Use of a truck – 2004 Isuzu flatbed 3 axle rigid – 3.5 tonnes.
3. Use of an excavator machine.
4. Storage of materials predominantly for Telstra pit, pipe and cable installation.
5. Total of 3 employees – the 2 landowners, and an external person.
6. Operating hours 6.30am to 4pm, Monday to Friday.
Cable materials and an excavator are taken offsite for installation of services in the Perth Metropolitan area, and Regional Western Australia.
Consultation
The Council advertised the proposal for 21 days on 10 March 2008 to six adjoining landowners. During the advertising period, the City received two written objections, and one advice of no objection.
Smart Growth Strategy
Nil.
Comment
Issues raised during the submissions, together with a comment on each is outlined below:
Issue 1
The business has previously involved numerous trucks, excavators and earthmoving equipment, operating seven days per week commencing at 5.30am.
Comment:
The ongoing operations and use of commercial vehicles on this property has been the subject of complaints from an adjoining landowner and investigations by Council officers. The applicant has been previously advised to reduce the scale of the operation to one truck and an excavator, and change their operating hours in accordance with the allowable requirements of Part 4.23.2 of District Planning Scheme Number 2 (DPS2) and the noise regulations. The applicant has taken several steps towards addressing some of the concerns of the City and whilst there have been ongoing concerns raised by the adjoining landowners, it may be possible to minimise the impact of the use through conditions on any approval.
Recommendation:
That the issue be noted.
Issue 2
Devaluation of adjoining properties.
Comment
The submittor has not demonstrated how the proposal would devalue the neighbouring properties. The applicant has advised the City that the adjoining property has recently been sold.
Recommendation:
That the issue not be supported.
Issue 3
Shed and storage area exceeds the 50 square metre limit for home business
Comment
The proposal has been requested by the applicant to be considered as a Home Business – Category 3. As per the provisions of the DPS2, Schedule 1 of the Scheme describes the definition of Home Business - Category 3: as a business, service, trade or similar activity carried on in a dwelling, or on land around a dwelling by a resident of the dwelling which:
“(e) occupies an area not exceeding 50 square metres. Council may approve, subject to community consultation, an area of up to 100 square metres, or one third of the floor area of the dwelling whichever is the lesser.”
The area nominated for the business is 205 square metres, which is contrary to the limit applied in
Schedule 1. However the applicant has indicated that there has been a scaling down of the operation and now only has one employee and that only one commercial vehicle will be kept on the property within the existing shed.
Associated with the scaling down of the operation it has also been advised that no delivery of material will occur to the premises and that stores for any job will be collected rather than delivered.
Recommendation
That the issue is supported and the area associated with the home business is limited to within the existing shed on the property and a 20 m2 office area within the residence. In this regard, the existing shed (green) is approximately 140 m2 in area and will contain the commercial vehicle and associated excavator, thereby occupying approximately 70 m2 of the shed. The remaining 70 m2 of shed area together with the 20 m2 allocated for home office represents a total of 90 m2 (excluding the commercial vehicle parking area within the shed). Whilst this amount exceeds the specified amount of 50 m2, the Council may approve up to 100 m2 for this purpose and providing the operation is contained wholly within the shed, the impact of the use may be minimised to an acceptable standard. The associated hard stand should only be utilised for parking of the employee with a domestic vehicle and non-business related purposes. Appropriate conditions should be imposed to ensure this occurs.
Issue 4
Damage to the road verge and employees are parking on the road verge.
Comment
Applicant has stated that the number of vehicles and employees has been reduced. The issue can be appropriately managed through conditions on the approval.
Recommendation
That the issue be noted.
Issue 5
Noise, dust, and rubbish generation associated with the activity and truck movement.
Comment
It is difficult to measure the extent of the complaint without monitoring by the Council’s compliance officer. However, noise, dust, and rubbish can be managed by conditions.
Recommendation
That the issue be noted.
Other Issues
In respect to Special Rural Zone, Clause 3.18.2(c) of DPS2 states that all development ‘shall be conducted in a manner that preserves local amenity and the natural landscape or rural character of the zone concerned’. In this regard it is noted that the sheds and associated hardstand on the property already exist and are consistent with the size and nature of other sheds within the locality. The main concern relates to the use of the facility for businesses purposes.
The objectives of Special Rural Zone specify the following: -
Objectives of the Clause 3.1.8.2 (c) Special Rural Zone include:
(a) designate areas where rural-residential retreats can be accommodated without detriment to the environment or the rural character;
(b) meet the demand for a rural lifestyle on small rural lots generally ranging from one to four hectares in size; and
(c) maintain and enhance the rural character and amenity of the locality.
The proposal has previously involved the storage and distribution of bulky materials and has been managed poorly with the accumulation of rubbish and the parking of additional commercial vehicles, thereby compounding the impact on the local residents’ amenity.
A site investigation conducted 26 June 2008 by the City’s compliance officer, confirmed three trucks parked onsite (refer Attachment 3 -photographs). Parking of these vehicles is contrary to the definition of a Home Business Category 3, which only allows one vehicle up to 3.5 tonnes tare weight. Associated with the three vehicles onsite is transporting of an excavator and materials, and towing of a trailer.
Subsequent to the inspection the applicant has indicated that the proposed home business has been down scaled to one commercial vehicle, which will be kept in the shed when it is on the property, no clients or customers will visit the property, only engage one employee, no deliveries made to the property and no items stored on the property in association with the operation, with the exception of items within the storage shed or on the commercial vehicle.
On the basis of the additional information provided by the applicant and modifications proposed, the home business (if managed by the landowner in the manner proposed) is considered acceptable.
Statutory Compliance
The proposal generally satisfies the definition of Homes Business Category 3 for number of vehicles and weight, and Clause 4.23.2 of District Town Planning Scheme Number 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal is consistent with one of the key areas of strategic focus identified in the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan, which promotes “A prosperous region achieved through economic growth and employment” and Outcome Objective 3.6 of the strategic plan, which specifies “increase support for new and existing business”.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the application for a Home Business Category 3 – Civil Engineering Operation, on No.8 (Lot 212) Tuscan Way, Gnangara submitted by D and T Booth SUBJECT to the following conditions:
1. Approval is granted to David and Tracy Booth only, is not transferable to any other person and does not run with the land in respect to which it is granted.
2. Only one commercial vehicle up to 3.5 tonnes in weight shall be retained on site.
3. The commercial vehicle and associated equipment (including excavator) shall only be kept within the shed whilst on the property.
4. The home business shall have a maximum of one employee and the employee shall only park his commuting (domestic) vehicle within the hard stand area.
5. The commercial vehicle and associated equipment shall be kept strictly in accordance with the following:
a) The vehicle is not started or maneuvered on site between the hours of 10.00 pm and 6.00 am the next following day;
b) The vehicle’s motor is not left running while the vehicle is unattended or in any event for any period in excess of five minutes; and
c) The parking and maneuvering of the vehicle shall not cause damage or removal to existing vegetation on the lot.
6. Only minor servicing and repair of vehicles shall be allowed to occur on-site. Major servicing and repair of vehicles shall be conducted off-site, to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.
7. No storage of materials or equipment associated with the home business shall occur outside of the existing shed.
8. The home business operation shall be managed in such a way to minimise the spread of dust from vehicles entering or leaving the premises.
ADVICE TO APPLICANT
In accordance with Part 4.23.4 of the District Planning Scheme Number 2, the applicant is advised that where a noise complaint is substantiated in accordance with the relevant Regulations made pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act 1986, the hours of operation shall be restricted to 7.00 am – 9.00 pm Monday to Saturday and 9.30 am – 9.00 pm Sundays and Public Holidays and that further non-compliance with this regulation may result in further action against the breach.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P34/1356V01
File Name: EB Development Application Shed Addition to a Single House Lot 201 14 Marginata Place Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Joseph Coppola
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for the development of a shed at Lot 201 (14) Marginata Place Wanneroo.
Applicant |
Vickie Hillary |
Owner |
Russell and Vickie Hillary |
Location |
Lot 201 (14) Marginata Place, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
4480sqm |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Special Residential |
Background
Lot 201 (14) Marginata Place, Wanneroo is a battleaxe lot located within the Special Residential Zone (refer Attachment 1).
The applicant previously applied for a shed at Lot 201 Marginata Place on 26 May 2008 (DA08/0476). The original application proposed a shed setback of 1.5m from the northern boundary, and 4.0m from the eastern boundary. As the proposed shed did not satisfy the setback requirements specified in the Scheme (five metres) for a side boundary the application was conditionally approved, subject to the shed being setback a minimum of 4 metres from the side boundaries. In issuing the approval, the City considered the merits of the proposal and exercised discretion under Part 4.2 of the Scheme to reduce the setbacks defined under Part 3.19.3(e) of the Scheme ‘The Special Residential Zone’ from five metres to four metres.
The applicant felt aggrieved by the setback condition and rather than appealing to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) has chosen to lodge a new application for the City’s consideration.
Detail
The application (DA08/0772) is to construct a shed with a dimension of 12.2m x 9.0m and an overall wall height of 3.95m. The application proposes this shed to be setback 2.5m (previously 1.5 metres) from the frontward (northern side) boundary, and 4.0m from the eastern side boundary. The applicant has provided a simple justification to the proposed setbacks, stating that they intend to retain selected flora and fauna on the lot.
For the assessment of the application received on 14 August 2008, the applicant was requested to pay the required fee of $123.00. Because the applicant felt aggrieved by resubmitting the application, the applicant has provided administration with a written request that this fee be reimbursed.
Consultation
Prior to the submission of the original application (DA08/0476), the applicant obtained letters of no objection from the affected landowners of lots 200 and 82.
Smart Growth Strategy
Consideration of this proposal should be consistent with Principle 1 of the City’s Smart Growth Strategy – Lifestyle and Housing Choices, which encourages a variety of housing types and enhancement of lifestyle options.
Comment
Consideration of the issues associated with this application could be disseminated into two components. The core considerations and issues have been outlined as per the following.
Reduced setback from the side boundaries:
Clause 3.19 of the District Planning Scheme outlines a list of objectives as well as development provisions for the Special Residential Zone. One objective of the Special Residential Zone as stated in clause 3.19.2 of the Scheme is ‘to create a spacious style of living in a low density setting’.
On assessment of the previous application, it was deemed that a setback of 4.0m from the eastern side boundary was acceptable, for it did not contravene the objectives of the Special Residential Zone, and a comment of no objection was received. The proposed setback from the northern side boundary of 1.5m was not supported, for it would contravene these same objectives.
As part of this most recent application, the applicant has not provided the City with any additional argument for administration to consider, especially on the variation to the setbacks. On assessment of this application, administration has no basis to consider allowing a further variation to the proposed northern side boundary setback already considered as part of the previous approval.
In summary, administration continues to support the 4.0m setback proposed from the eastern side boundary. Even though the applicant has proposed the shed setback 2.5m from the northern side boundary as opposed to 1.5m proposed on the previous application, this setback proposal is not supported, as it is believed that allowing this setback would still contravene the objectives of the Special Residential Zone.
It is further advised that a minimum setback of at least 3 metres is required in accordance with the provisions of Section 33 of the Bush Fires Act
Reimbursement of Fees:
The fee of $123.00 paid on 14 August 2008 is a standard fee which applicants are required to pay for all development applications where the cost of development is $50,000 or less. The application fee paid generally covers the costs involved in assessing and processing applications by the City’s Officers and Administration Staff.
Because a report to Council has been prepared as part of this application, the efforts of administration to process this application have been more extensive than a standard development application determined under delegated authority. It is in the view of administration that the fee of $123.00 not be refunded to the applicant in this instance.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been considered in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2. With the exception of the proposed setbacks, the proposal is seen to generally comply with clause 3.19 of the Scheme in relation to the provisions specified for the Special Residential Zone, as well as the provisions in Schedule 14 for Special Residential Zone (01).
Strategic Implications
The proposal should satisfy the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“1.4 Minimise impact of development on natural landform.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to the schedule of fees and charges for 2008/2009 financial year agreed by Council at the Special Council Meeting on 25 July 2008, Council shall NOT REIMBURSE the applicant the fee of $123.00 to process this application, and ADVISE the applicant of its decision;
2. APPROVES the application submitted by Mrs. Hillary for a shed to be erected on Lot 201 (14) Marginata Place, Wanneroo, subject to the following conditions:
a) The shed shall be no closer than 4.0m to the northern and eastern side boundaries;
b) The 4.0m setback areas are to be kept clear of flammable material at all times;
c) The approval is for the shed addition only. The approval is not for any other development on this lot;
d) The approved shed shall be ancillary to the single residential dwelling, and must not be used for commercial and/or industrial purposes or for human habitation;
e) All stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the City; and
f) Except to the extent necessary for the construction of approved buildings, no land shall be cleared of vegetation without the prior written approval of the City.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0009V014
File Name: FA Development Applications Determined by Delegated Authority for August 2008.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Development Applications determined by Administration between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008, acting under Delegated Authority from Council.
Background
Nil
Detail
The City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme 2 (DPS2) provides Council with planning approval powers which are designed to avoid conflict between different land uses on adjoining lots. It is also necessary to ensure the completed developments meet the required standards such as building setbacks, carparking and landscaping. Planning approvals are not generally required for single residential houses unless they seek to vary the requirements of the Residential Design Codes (RD Codes.)
Council has delegated some of its responsibilities for decision making on planning applications to certain officers in Administration which enables the processing of applications within the required 60 day statutory period and within normal customer expectations.
Administration, in assessing planning proposals, attempts to extract from the relevant planning documents the key policies and requirements of Council in order to make comments and recommendations on the issues raised in the assessment of each individual planning application.
Planning applications determined by Administration between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008, acting under Delegated Authority from Council are included in Attachment 1.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
Nil.
Statutory Compliance
A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 29 August 2006 (item GS08-08/06 refers). The decisions referred to in Attachment 1 of this report are in accordance with this register.
Strategic Implications
This report is consistent with the corporate management and development goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
Determination of applications under delegated authority satisfies Outcome Objective 4.4 of the City’s Strategic Plan to Improve business performance and the quality of service delivery.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Planning applications incur administration fees which are generally based on the Town Planning (Local Government Planning Fees) Regulations and have been adopted by Council in its annual budget. The estimated cost of development for each application is listed in Attachment 1. Applications where an estimated cost has not been provided, are either applications for the exercising of discretion or for a change of use.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the determinations made by Administration acting under delegated authority from Council on planning applications processed between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0700 22/07/2008 23 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 3 CHRISP PLACE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 273 P 10182 Vol 620 Fol 65A
Description ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION
Applicants K GROVER
File Number P36/0510V01
DA08/0492 30/05/2008 48 $19,000.00 Approved
Prop address 321 GIBBS ROAD NOWERGUP WA 6032
Land Lot 8 D 63664 Vol 1664 Fol 774
Description SINGLE HOUSE - RURAL SHED ADDITION
Applicants RJ MACLEOD
File Number P24/0064V01
DA08/0754 08/08/2008 13 $25,000.00 Approved
Prop address FAST FOOD 9 BERGEN WAY MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 6 P 21205 Vol 2069 Fol 059
Description EXTENSION OF SERVERY BOOTH AT
MCDONALDS DRIVE-THRU AREA
Applicants F MODUS DESIGN PTY LTD
File Number P22/1277V01
DA08/0644 07/07/2008 1 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 6 MEMPHIS RIDGE HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 142 DP 38442 Vol 2554 Fol 751
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - HAIRDRESSING
Applicants N D'OLIMPIO
File Number P13/0553V01
DA08/0106 29/01/2008 142 $400,000.00 Approved
Prop address 6 VIRIDIAN DRIVE BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot 2 DP 46178 Vol 2605 Fol 174
Description PLCAE OF PUBLIC WORSHIP - KINGDOM HALL
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
Applicants GW HUNTER
File Number P04/0592V01
DA08/0708 24/07/2008 15 $755,000.00 Approved
Prop address 16 YARMOUTH ROAD JINDALEE WA 6036
Land Lot 1161 DP 46614 Vol 2597 Fol 673
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants HUTCHCRAFT HOMES
File Number P15/0137V01
DA08/0555 19/06/2008 43 $360,000.00 Approved
Prop address 41 MESSINA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065
Land Lot 914 DP 49784 Vol 2641 Fol 115
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLINGS
Applicants C CASELLA
File Number P29/0499V01
DA08/0326 07/04/2008 63 $221,780.00 Approved
Prop address 14 CIVIC DRIVE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 3 Vol 2677 Fol 697 S/P 52064
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants DALE ALCOCK HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P34/2104V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0736 04/08/2008 6 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 47 NYUNDA DRIVE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 288 P 11433 Vol 1968 Fol 392
Description APPLICATION TO PARK COMMERCIAL VEHICLE
Applicants K MARTIN
File Number P34/2350V01
DA08/0710 25/07/2008 24 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 54 BUCKINGHAM DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 168 P 11775 Vol 1804 Fol 204
Description EIGHT (8) WAREHOUSE UNITS
- AMENDMENTS TO ORIGINAL PLANS ON DA08/0317
Applicants MAPEL BUILDING PTY LTD
File Number P33/0656V01
DA08/0670 14/07/2008 15 $900,000.00 Approved
Prop address 406 KINGSWAY LANDSDALE WA 6065
Land Lot 122 D 25161 Vol 1311 Fol 149
Description DISPLAY HOMES, ASSOCIATED CARPARKS & SIGNAGE
Applicants RPS KOLTASZ SMITH
File Number P17/1156V01
DA08/0196 27/02/2008 119 $1,030,000.00 Approved
Prop address 65 PRINDIVILLE DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Part Lot 218 D 55704 Vol 1629 Fol 257
Description FACTORY ADDITIONS
Applicants ROOFMART PTY LTD
File Number P33/0510V01
DA08/0603 27/06/2008 26 $6,530.00 Approved
Prop address 35 MAREE PLACE GNANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 221 P 17238 Vol 1858 Fol 826
Description ADDITIONS TO EXISTING DWELLING (GARAGE)
Applicants HIGHLINE LTD
File Number P12/0280V01
DA08/0714 28/07/2008 5 $6,500.00 Approved
Prop address 3 ITEA PLACE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 9 D 88911 Vol 2053 Fol 810
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (PATIO)
Applicants DJ RIMMER
File Number P22/0577V01
DA08/0742 01/08/2008 13 $3,700.00 Approved
Prop address 17 ROSEWELL GREEN WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 2501 Fol 062 S/P 38477
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (PATIO)
Applicants ALLTOGETHER ROOFING
File Number P34/0610V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0449 15/05/2008 17 $642,955.00 Approved
Prop address 14 SWANSEA PROMENADE MINDARIE WA 6030
Land Lot 304 DP 37133 Vol 2542 Fol 58
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants ROSS GRIFFIN HOMES
File Number P22/1451V01
DA08/0693 18/07/2008 10 $200,000.00 Approved
Prop address 83 INSPIRATION DRIVE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 320 DP 49500 Vol 2639 Fol 89
Description FACTORY (ONE UNIT)
Applicants G TRPEVSKI
File Number P33/0560V01
DA08/0376 29/04/2008 68 $499,000.00 Approved
Prop address 49 BORANUP AVENUE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 596 DP 52774 Vol 2656 Fol 757
Description WAREHOUSE (4 UNITS), OFFICE AND LUNCHBAR
Applicants Estate of Late GH POPAL
File Number P08/3440V01
DA08/0662 10/07/2008 15 $230,000.00 Approved
Prop address 27 BRAEMOUNT ROAD DARCH WA 6065
Land Lot 403 DP 56903 Vol 2678 Fol 002
Description TWO STOREY DWELLING
Applicants G NASTEVSKI, S NASTEVSKI
File Number P09/1866V01
DA08/0357 22/04/2008 63 $684,000.00 Approved
Prop address 84 CALLAWAY STREET WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 401 DP 56834 Vol 2681 Fol 970
Description FACTORY UNITS
Applicants JCM CORPORATION PTY LTD
File Number P33/0657V01
DA08/0669 14/07/2008 25 $695,488.18 Approved
Prop address 47 FRANKLIN ROAD WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 127 P 13145 Vol 1558 Fol 663
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants C/O - Beaumonde Homes
File Number P34/2686V01
DA08/0423 09/05/2008 67 $380,000.00 Approved
Prop address 23 DALLAS CRESCENT WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 181 P 9614 Vol 363 Fol 048A
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLING
Applicants BP WOLVAARDT
File Number P34/1442V01
DA08/0623 02/07/2008 28 $2,000.00 Approved
Prop address 18A MUNDI PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 1924 Fol 586 S/P 21415
Description PATIO TO DWELLING
Applicants MINDARIE PATIOS
File Number P34/3230V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0739 05/08/2008 5 $0.00 Approved
Prop address CLARKSON NEIGHBHD SHOP9 9/30 AINSBURY
PARADE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 9 Vol 2127 Fol 538 S/P 34058
Description CHANGE OF USE TO BEAUTY PARLOUR
Applicants L HUNT
File Number P08/0279V01
DA07/0656 27/07/2007 253 $0.00 Refused
Prop address 61 KEY LARGO DRIVE CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 506 DP 47105 Vol 2605 Fol 122
Description CHANGE OF USE TO SURF AND SKATE SHOP
(TENANCY 1)
Applicants MICHAEL SWIFT & ASSOCIATES
File Number P08/0871V02
DA08/0401 05/05/2008 67 $4,100.00 Approved
Prop address 2 BOBOLI WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 1 Vol 2682 Fol 310 S/P 54342
Description GROUPED DWELLING - PERGOLA/PATIO ADDITION
Applicants WEST COAST PATIOS
File Number P25/0575V01
DA08/0476 28/05/2008 25 $11,000.00 Approved
Prop address 14 MARGINATA PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 201 DP 56699
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants VL HILLARY
File Number P34/1356V01
DA08/0737 04/08/2008 10 $150,000.00 Approved
Prop address 23 CALOUNDRA ROAD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 609 DP 55213
Description WAREHOUSE AND SHOWROOM
Applicants GIONN MARTINO
File Number P08/3594V01
DA08/0738 05/08/2008 13 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 22/291 OCEAN KEYS BOULEVARD
CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 22 Vol 2675 Fol 481 S/P 50531
Description PHARMACY
Applicants K COLLINS
File Number P08/3527V01
DA08/0674 15/07/2008 26 $360,000.00 Approved
Prop address 15 HASTINGS STREET WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 2 D 57001 Vol 1536 Fol 846
Description 2 GROUPED DWELLINGS (TWO UNITS)
Applicants MJ DRAKE
File Number P34/3093V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0530 11/06/2008 40 $9,763.00 Approved
Prop address 2 SCENIC DRIVE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 1 D 74789 Vol 1830 Fol 353
Description SINGLE HOUSE - PATIO ADDITION
Applicants THORN ROOFING CONTRACTORS
File Number P34/3287V01
DA08/0361 23/04/2008 92 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address 135 WESCO ROAD NOWERGUP WA 6032
Land Lot 13 D 39500 Vol 1323 Fol 897
Description RURAL SHED ADDITION
Applicants CARLOTTA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
File Number P24/0019V01
DA08/0322 14/04/2008 86 $4,300.00 Refused
Prop address 25 MARGINATA PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 85 P 16928 Vol 1835 Fol 985
Description BOAT SHELTER ADDITION
Applicants PERTH HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTRE
File Number P34/2238V01
DA08/0757 08/08/2008 13 $3,650.00 Approved
Prop address WESTBROOK MEWS 2/17 WESTBROOK WAY
GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Lot 21 Vol 2559 Fol 273 S/P 44797
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (PATIO)
Applicants PATIOS PLUS AUSTRALIA
File Number P11/0453V01
DA08/0705 23/07/2008 10 $13,000.00 Approved
Prop address 72 MEADOWLANDS DRIVE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 70 P 17294 Vol 1860 Fol 890
Description RURAL SHED
Applicants K KIDD
File Number P20/0281V01
DA08/0635 04/07/2008 2 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 107 SANTA BARBARA PARADE
QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 339 DP 28143 Vol 2507 Fol 891
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 3 –
INTERNET BUSINESS - E-BAY
Applicants LJA WOOD
File Number P27/0020V01
DA08/0645 08/07/2008 26 $1,720.00 Approved
Prop address MADELEY GARDENS 23/21 BRYANSTON PASS
MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 23 Vol 2614 Fol 605 S/P 48344
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING GROUP DWELLING
(PATIO) (UNIT 23/21)
Applicants HERITAGE OUTDOOR
File Number P18/1297V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0697 21/07/2008 5 $406,818.00 Approved
Prop address 11 ISLAND WAY YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 148 DP 55467 Vol 2663 Fol 967
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants RURAL BUILDING CO T/AS RESIDENTIAL ATTITUDES
File Number P36/1596V01
DA08/0740 04/08/2008 10 $150,000.00 Approved
Prop address 25 CALOUNDRA ROAD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 608 DP 55213 Vol 2673 Fol 229
Description WAREHOUSE AND SHOWROOM
Applicants GIONN MARTINO
File Number P08/3593V01
DA08/0517 05/06/2008 56 $220,000.00 Approved
Prop address 6 GREYLOCK MEANDER MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 471 DP 57136 Vol 2679 Fol 050
Description DISPLAY HOME
Applicants VENTURA HOMES
File Number P18/1744V01
DA08/0750 07/08/2008 4 $141,382.00 Approved
Prop address 16 FEDAMORE APPROACH RIDGEWOOD WA 6030
Land Lot 2408 DP 58912 Vol 2689 Fol 162
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants HOMEBUYERS CENTRE
File Number P28/1111V01
DA08/0622 02/07/2008 25 $17,475.00 Approved
Prop address 168 PINJAR ROAD MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 15 DP 222778 Vol 1519 Fol 396
Description SINGLE HOUSE – SHED ADDITION
Applicants JI BOOTH
File Number P20/0271V01
DA08/0682 16/07/2008 13 $400,000.00 Approved
Prop address 18 DEMPSTER PLACE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 44 P 12888 Vol 1538 Fol 356
Description SINGLE HOUSE ADDITIONS – AMENDMENT TO
DA08/0189
Applicants K ACTON
File Number P20/0257V01
DA08/0649 09/07/2008 23 $10,000.00 Approved
Prop address 67 ARITI AVENUE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 74 P 14713 Vol 1677 Fol 401
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (OUTBUILDING)
Applicants SE GILLETT
File Number P34/2875V01
DA08/0453 19/05/2008 64 $8,500.00 Approved
Prop address 51 EMERALD DRIVE CARABOODA WA 6033
Land Lot 6 DP 24939
Description SINGLE HOUSE – DECKING AND STAIRS ADDITIONS
(RETROSPECTIVE APPROVAL)
Applicants AJS HUNGERFORD
File Number P06/0024V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0729 30/07/2008 4 $387,000.00 Approved
Prop address 28 CHEROKEE GREEN CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 1158 DP 52066 Vol 2637 Fol 989
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants AVERNA HOMES
File Number P08/3651V01
DA08/0647 08/07/2008 23 $4,500.00 Approved
Prop address 1 MELITA RISE PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 2657 Fol 970 S/P 51619
Description ADDITIONS TO EXISTING GROUP DWELLING (PATIO)
Applicants OUTDOOR WORLD
File Number P25/0598V01
DA08/0636 08/07/2008 19 $8,000.00 Approved
Prop address 46 OLIVEDALE ROAD MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 2 DP 56741
Description GROUPED DWELLINGS (4 UNITS) - AMENDED PLANS
Applicants H ANTULOV
File Number P18/1743V01
DA08/0661 10/07/2008 23 $156,568.00 Approved
Prop address 3 VERDELLO WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 2672 Fol 700 S/P 51818
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants VENTURA HOMES SPECIAL PROJECTS
File Number P25/0759V01
DA08/0678 15/07/2008 18 $5,400.00 Approved
Prop address 3B VALENCIA COURT ALEXANDER
HEIGHTS WA 6064
Land Lot 2 Vol 1830 Fol 874 S/P 17208
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING GROUPED DWELLING
(PATIO) (UNIT 3B)
Applicants SWAN PATIOS
File Number P01/0027V01
DA08/0570 23/06/2008 39 $950,000.00 Approved
Prop address 11 EDISON RISE WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 4 DP 43073 Vol 2577 Fol 577
Description EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT
Applicants PACE PROJECTS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
File Number P33/0523V01
DA08/0671 14/07/2008 33 $1,800,000.00 Approved
Prop address 12 CALLAWAY STREET WANGARA WA 6065
Land Lot 482 DP 52883 Vol 2671 Fol 442
Description WAREHOUSE/FACTORY WITH INCIDENTAL OFFICE
Applicants Mr J ITALIANO
File Number P33/0645V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0621 02/07/2008 30 $320,000.00 Approved
Prop address 44 MOSCOW RETREAT HOCKING WA 6065
Land Lot 243 DP 56911 Vol 2681 Fol 137
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLINGS
Applicants A COLAVECCHIO
File Number P13/1509V01
DA08/0760 11/08/2008 10 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 17 VERDELLO WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 1 Vol 2684 Fol 685 S/P 54247
Description SINGLE HOUSE (AMENDED PLANS) SEE DA08/0433
Applicants AFFORDABLE LIVING HOMES
File Number P25/0766V01
DA08/0704 22/07/2008 28 $123,610.00 Approved
Prop address 66 FEAKLE BEND RIDGEWOOD WA 6030
Land Lot 2362 DP 58912 Vol 2689 Fol 116
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants VENTURA HOMES
File Number P28/1080V01
DA08/0748 06/08/2008 10 $5,470.00 Approved
Prop address 11 LEE-STEERE DRIVE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 6 P 12887 Vol 1538 Fol 264
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (PATIO)
Applicants OUTDOOR WORLD
File Number P20/0282V01
DA08/0731 01/08/2008 8 $2,100.00 Approved
Prop address 32B OLDFIELD ROAD GIRRAWHEEN WA 6064
Land Part Lot 708 P 10053
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING (CARPORT)
Applicants HOUSING AUTHORITY
File Number P11/1736V01
DA08/0503 03/06/2008 55 $2,000.00 Approved
Prop address 1A JOONDALUP PLACE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 2 Vol 1536 Fol 900 S/P 7062
Description WORKSHOP
Applicants PW BETTS
File Number P34/1119V01
DA08/0664 11/07/2008 16 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 20 HARBOUR ELBOW BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot 398 P 24258 Vol 2196 Fol 082
Description Building Envelope Modification
Applicants AI PORTEUS
File Number P04/0037V01
DA08/0511 04/06/2008 22 $41,000.00 Approved
Prop address 20 HARBOUR ELBOW BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031
Land Lot 398 P 24258 Vol 2196 Fol 082
Description ADDITIONS TO EXISTING DWELLING (SHEDS WATER
TANKS FENCES SOLAR WATER HEATER PV )
Applicants AI PORTEUS
File Number P04/0037V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0777 14/08/2008 3 $0.00 Approved
Prop address 31 BOWMORE DRIVE WANNEROO WA 6065
Land Lot 615 DP 53363 Vol 2642 Fol 780
Description HOME BUSINESS - CATEGORY 2 - BEAUTY THERAPY
Applicants CJ DIAMOND
File Number P34/2954V01
DA08/0753 06/08/2008 11 $152,275.00 Approved
Prop address 43 GRANITE PLACE YANCHEP WA 6035
Land Lot 658 DP 53318 Vol 2651 Fol 686
Description SINGLE HOUSE
Applicants JWH GROUP PTY LTD
File Number P36/1492V01
DA08/0789 14/08/2008 8 $8,632.00 Approved
Prop address 110 GREENVALE PLACE MARIGINIUP WA 6065
Land Lot 5 P 12887 Vol 1538 Fol 363
Description SINGLE HOUSE – PATIO ADDITION
Applicants OUTDOOR WORLD
File Number P20/0283V01
DA08/0703 22/07/2008 12 $34,713.00 Approved
Prop address 108 DAMIAN ROAD JANDABUP WA 6065
Land Lot 35 D 54677 Vol 1525 Fol 061
Description SINGLE HOUSE - SHED ADDITION
Applicants OUTDOOR WORLD
File Number P14/0042V01
DA08/0722 30/07/2008 5 $40,000.00 Approved
Prop address SUBDIVIDED 26 MIRRABOOKA AVENUE
KOONDOOLA WA 6064
Land Lot 1 D 41047 Vol 1409 Fol 858
Description FIRE PUMP HOUSE & ASSOCIATED WATER
STORAGE TANKS
Applicants THE BUCHAN GROUP ARCHITECTS
File Number P16/0081V01
DA07/0892 28/09/2007 59 $50,000.00 Approved
Prop address 7 JOSEPHINE WAY ALEXANDER HEIGHTS WA 6064
Land Lot 714 D 77105 Vol 1860 Fol 938
Description ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION
Applicants GK ALONE
File Number P01/0390V01
DA08/0557 19/06/2008 42 $20,000.00 Approved
Prop address 16 SIMPSON STREET QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
Land Lot 2 Vol 2137 Fol 602 S/P 34307
Description SINGLE HOUSE (AMENDED PLANS)
Applicants J GILBERT
File Number P27/1189V01
Development Applications determined for Period City of Wanneroo
WHERE (Issued date BETWEEN 01/08/2008 00:00:00 AND 31/08/2008)
Ram Id Date Application Days Est Cost Decision
DA08/0675 15/07/2008 18 $350,000.00 Approved
Prop address OCEAN KEYS SHOPPING CENTRE 36 OCEAN KEYS
BOULEVARD CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Lot 406 P 23838 Vol 2183 Fol 315
Description CHANGE OF USE - TO RESTAURANT
Applicants Q DO
File Number P08/1998V01
DA08/0732 27/07/2008 11 $30,000.00 Approved
Prop address TENANCY 2 2/27 OCEAN KEYS BOULEVARD
CLARKSON WA 6030
Land Part Lot 511 DP 39299
Description CHANGE OF USE (FROM GIFT AND SOUVENIR SHOP
TO HAIR AND BEAUTY SALON)
Applicants SHARON JOHNSON AND JOY SMITH
File Number P08/115-V05
DA08/0279 02/04/2008 86 $400,000.00 Approved
Prop address 36 COOPER STREET MADELEY WA 6065
Land Lot 785 DP 50838 Vol 2646 Fol 277
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLING
Applicants M SAUNDERS
File Number P18/1539V01
DA08/0727 25/07/2008 9 $280,000.00 Approved
Prop address 16 TITIAN WAY TAPPING WA 6065
Land Lot 637 DP 52684 Vol 2648 Fol 504
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLINGS
Applicants DANMAR HOMES PTY LTD
File Number P31/2182V01
DA08/0574 23/06/2008 35 $320,000.00 Approved
Prop address 6 TRAMINER WAY PEARSALL WA 6065
Land Lot 164 DP 52776 Vol 2648 Fol 685
Description TWO GROUPED DWELLINGS
Applicants AP SPANO
File Number P25/0780V01
DA08/0776 14/08/2008 9 $4,800.00 Approved
Prop address 1 PYMORE CRESCENT BUTLER WA 6036
Land Lot 1 Vol 2687 Fol 353 S/P 54639
Description ADDITION TO EXISTING DWELLING ((PATIO)
Applicants PATIOS PLUS AUSTRALIA
File Number P05/2640V01
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0008
File Name: FC Subdivision Applications Determined Under Delegated Authority During August 2008.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Acting Director, Planning and Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Sue Shatford
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: 17
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To note subdivision applications processed between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008 under delegated authority.
Detail
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for determining all subdivision applications within the State. Applications for approval are lodged with the WAPC and are referred to local governments and affected public bodies for comment. Comments are made within 42 days of receiving the application after which the Commission determines the applications. There is a right of appeal by the applicant if aggrieved with the Commission’s decision.
Council has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer its functions relating to the provision of comments to the Commission on subdivision applications. The Chief Executive Officer has in turn delegated to the Planning and Development Directorate this responsibility. A Land Development Unit has been established to assist with the assessment of all applications.
Those applications considered to be either controversial in nature or contrary to Council policy, are referred to Council for consideration. All other applications are dealt with in respect to the following categories.
SCU 1 Subdivision applications received which are generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan (including Outline Development Plan and Development Guide Plan).
SCU 2 Subdivision applications previously supported, or not supported by Council and subsequently determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consistent with the Council’s recommendation.
SCU 3 Applications for extension of subdivisional approval issued by the WAPC which were previously supported by Council.
SCU 4 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation which result from conditions of development approval given by or on behalf of Council.
SCU 5 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots which would allow the development of the land for uses permitted in the zone within which that land is situated including applications involving the excision of land for road widening, sump sites, school sites, etc.
SCU 6 Applications for subdivision or amalgamation of lots contrary to Council or WAPC Policy or are not generally consistent with an approved or Agreed Structure Plan.
The following table provides the details of the subdivision applications dealt with under delegated authority between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
A Delegated Authority Register was adopted by Council at its meeting on 29 August 2006 (item GS08-08/06 refers). The decisions referred to in this report are in accordance with this register.
Strategic Implications
This report is consistent with the corporate management and development goal of the City’s Strategic Plan, which seeks to establish an organisation that is open, accountable and committed to customer service.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The City does not receive any fees for the consideration of subdivisions or amalgamation applications.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the actions taken in relation to providing comments to the Western Australian Planning Commission on subdivision applications processed under delegated authority between 1 August 2008 and 31 August 2008 as listed below:
Subdivision Application Delegations
Att |
WAPC No/ Received Date |
Location / Owner |
DPS2 Zoning LDU Category |
Advice |
WAPC Advised |
1 |
SU1235-08
24/07/2008 |
LOT 33 (5) QUINNS ROAD, QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030 JUVENALA A YIANNAKIS & PANAGIOTIS G YIANNAKIS |
RESIDENTIAL SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
07/08/2008 |
2 |
SU1205-08
21/07/2008 |
LOT 99 (5) PEARCE STREET, QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030 ROSE-MARIE A PALMER & STEWART D PALMER |
RESIDENTIAL
SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
06/08/2008 |
3 |
SU1280-08
31/07/2008 |
LOT 62 (25) BURT STREET QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030 BRIAN C RYDER & PATRICIA M RYDER |
RESIDENTIAL SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
07/08/2008 |
4 |
SU138103
18/07/2008 |
PART LOT 4 (240) FLYNN DRIVE NEERABUP WA 6031 CITY OF WANNEROO |
REGIONAL RESERVATION – PUBLIC PURPOSES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
04/08/2008 |
5 |
SU1191-08
18/07/2008 |
LOT 46 (127) KEMP STREET PEARSALL WA 6065
TRUST COMPANY LIMITED |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
21/08/2008
|
6 |
SU1115-08
11/07/2008 |
LOT 1084 (34) KAHANA PARKWAY BUTLER WA 6036
HELEN J PHELAN, ELIZABETH F OVERHEU, KAYE M KEAM |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
07/08/2008 |
7 |
SU136089
18/07/2008 |
LOT 9014 (602) TWO ROCKS ROAD YANCHEP WA 6035 YANCHEP SUN CITY PTY LTD & CAPRICORN INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
21/08/2008 |
8 |
SU1266-08
30/07/2008 |
LOT 512 (23) PINTABONA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD
|
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
9 |
SU1265-08
30/07/2008 |
LOT 514 (19) PINTABONA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008
|
10 |
SU1267-08
31/07/2008 |
LOT 521 (22) PINTABONA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
11 |
SU1268-08
30/07/2008 |
LOT 524 (16) PINTABONA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
12 |
SU1261-08
30/07/2008 |
LOT 526 (12) PINTABONA DRIVE SINAGRA WA 6065
JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU 1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
13 |
SU1264-08
31/07/2008 |
LOT 536 (7) RADICI LINK SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
14 |
SU1262-08
31/07/2008 |
LOT 538 (11) RADICI LINK SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
15 |
SU1269-08
31/07/2008 |
LOT 539 (15) RADICI LINK SINAGRA WA 6065 JAZNA PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1 |
SUPPORTED |
18/08/2008 |
16 |
SU138033
15/07/2008 |
LOT 9503 (99) REEF BREAK DRIVE TWO ROCKS WA 6037 ZEBRA PROPERTIES PTY LTD AND P & N LANDREACH PTY LTD |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SCU1
|
SUPPORTED |
14/08/2008 |
17 |
SU138193
01/08/2008 |
LOT 9102 (131) FLYNN DRIVE BANKSIA GROVE WA 6031 HOMESWEST VACANT |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL 02 REGIONAL RESERVATION – OTHER REGIONAL ROAD SCU5 |
SUPPORTED |
25/08/2008 |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: 08031V01
File Name: AA Tender No 08031 The Supply and Delivery of Three 3 Trucks of Varying Configurations.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: COW1065
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08031 for the Supply and Delivery of Three Trucks of Varying Configuration.
Background
Truck Plant No 97005 was purchased in October 2004 and is used by Infrastructure – Engineering Maintenance to transport and remove materials from work sites. Truck Plant Nos 96002 and 96003 were purchased in May 2001 and are used by Infrastructure – Parks Maintenance to transport and remove materials from work sites.
The City’s Plant Replacement Program was developed by using the benchmarked replacement periods used in the civil construction and maintenance industry for specified items of plant. The program is reviewed on an annual basis and the items of plant due for replacement are assessed to ascertain their current condition, operational performance and recent maintenance history. The outcome of the assessment may determine whether the items of plant are replaced sooner rather than later in the program. As a result of the assessment it was recommended that Plant No 97005, 96002 and 96003 be replaced, noting that the changeover period can range from six to nine months
Provision was made in the City’s 2008/2009 Plant Replacement Program to replace Plant Nos. 97005, 96002 and 96003.
Detail
Tender No 08031 for the Supply and Delivery of Three Trucks of Varying Configuration was advertised on19 July 2008 and closed on 05 August 2008.
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Coordinator – Fleet Services, Fleet and Stores Supervisor, Fleet Support Officer, Coordinator - Engineering Maintenance and Coordinator - Parks Maintenance, evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria:
Item |
Description |
Score |
1 |
Whole of life costs |
65% |
2 |
Operational assessment |
25% |
3 |
Mechanical assessment. |
10% |
One Tandem Axle Tipper Truck
Price of Vehicles Offered
The tender specification required that the provision of a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Spare Front Tyre with Carrier and Detroit Style Locker Differential be priced separately as options. Some of these options are standard on some of the trucks as tendered therefore the Tendered Price reported below includes the price of all of these options.
The following table summarizes the tenders received for the Supply and Delivery of One Tandem Axle Tipper Truck:
Tenderer |
Tendered Price |
Budget |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi Fuso FV51 |
$164,690 |
$180,000 |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS 420 |
$182,104 |
|
WA Hino – FM 500 Series 2632 |
$157,580 |
|
Major Motors – Isuzu FXZ 1500 Medium |
$159,063 |
|
Major Motors – Isuzu CXZ 455 |
$182,757 |
The tender specification required a truck with minimum kilowatts of Engine Power 250 Kw [Clause 1 [1.1] and a 13-speed road ranger transmission [Clause 1 [1.3]. The WA Hino submitted Hino FM 500 Series 2632 and the Major Motors submitted Isuzu FXZ 1500 Medium did not comply with these minimum specifications and therefore were not considered further.
1. Whole of Life Costs
Whole of life costs for the trucks offered, with options have been assessed as follows:
TENDERER |
Skipper Trucks – Fuso FV51 |
Major Motors – Isuzu Giga CXZ455 |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS420 |
Purchase Price |
$164,690 |
$182,757 |
$182,104 |
Service Costs |
$8,313 |
$5,222 |
$10,516 |
Total Costs |
$173,003 |
$187,979 |
$192,620 |
Estimated Resale |
$86,417 |
$91,897 |
$108,351 |
Nett WOLC |
$86,586 |
$96,082 |
$84,269 |
Reliable fuel consumption figures could not be established for these trucks and therefore have not been included in the whole of life cost analysis.
Resale values have been estimated using the Red Book method.
The variances in Service Costs are partly attributed to manufacturers of some models specifying shorter service intervals resulting in a greater number of services being performed over the same period compared to other models.
The following table summarises the ranking of Whole Of Life Costs achieved by the tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS420 |
1 |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 |
2 |
Major Motors – Isuzu Giga CXZ455 |
3 |
2. Operational Assessment
Operation officers from Engineering Maintenance attended demonstrations of the WA Hino – 700 Series FS420 and the Major Motors Isuzu Giga CXZ455 at the premises of both tenderers to conduct operational assessments of these trucks.
The City currently owns and operates a Mitsubishi FV51 (Plant No. 97021) as tendered by Skipper Trucks. Operational officers conducted operational assessment upon this truck.
Cabin ergonomics and gearing of transmission were features highly regarded by Operational officers during the assessments. The size of a truck that suits the working requirements was also considered important with a preference for the truck to not be too large.
The following table summarises the ranking of operational assessments:
Tender |
Rank |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS420 |
2 |
Major Motors – Isuzu Giga CXZ455 |
2 |
3. Mechanical Assessment
The Fleet Support Officer attended demonstrations of the WA Hino – 700 Series FS420 and the Major Motors Isuzu Giga CXZ455 at the premises of both tenderers to conduct mechanical assessments of these trucks.
The City currently owns and operates a Mitsubishi FV51 (Plant No. 97021) as tendered by Skipper Trucks. The Fleet Support Officer conducted a mechanical assessment upon this truck.
The Fleet Support Officer identified the Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 as possessing the 13-speed transmission with the counter shaft brake as specified and preferred in the tender specification. A counter shaft brake system is highly regarded due to increased clutch life that this system provides in comparison to other systems the City has experienced.
The following table summarises the ranking of mechanical assessments:
Tender |
Rank |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS420 |
2 |
Major Motors – Isuzu Giga CXZ455 |
2 |
Overall Weighted Score
The following table summarises the Overall Weighted Score ranking achieved by tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino 700 Series FS420 |
2 |
Major Motors – Isuzu Giga CXZ455 |
3 |
Two Full Forward Control Tipper Trucks
Price of Vehicle Offered
The tender specification required that the provision of a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Spare Front Tyre with Carrier and Detroit Style Locker Differential be priced separately as options. Some of these options are standard on some of the trucks as tendered therefore the Tendered Price reported below includes the price of all of these options.
The following table summarizes the tenders received for the Supply and Delivery of Two Full Forward Control Tipper Trucks:
Tenderer |
Tendered Price per truck |
Budget |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
$106,934 |
$130,000 per truck |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
$111,110 |
|
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
$108,800 |
|
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
$106,650 |
|
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [9 speed transmission] |
$109,980 |
1. Whole of Life Costs
Whole of life costs for the trucks offered, with options have been assessed as per truck and are summarised in the following table:
Tenderer |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [9 speed transmission] |
Purchase Price |
$106,934 |
$111,110 |
$108,800 |
$106,650 |
$109,980 |
Service Costs |
$9,355 |
$9,355 |
$6,385 |
$6,536 |
$6,536 |
Total Costs |
$116,289 |
$120,465 |
$115,185 |
$113,186 |
$116,516 |
Estimated Resale |
$58,505 |
$60,790 |
$61,157 |
$62,281 |
$64,226 |
Nett WOLC |
$57,784 |
$59,675 |
$54,028 |
$50,905 |
$52,290 |
Reliable fuel consumption figures could not be established for these trucks and therefore have not been included in the whole of life cost analysis.
Resale values have been estimated using the Red Book method.
The variances in service costs are partly attributed to manufacturers of some models specifying shorter service intervals resulting in a greater number of services being performed over the same period compared to other models.
The following table summarises the ranking of Whole Of Life Costs achieved by the tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [9 speed transmission] |
2 |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
3 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
4 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
5 |
2. Operational Assessment
Parks Maintenance Operation officers conducted operational assessments on the tendered cab/chassis trucks at the City’s Operations Centre via demonstration cab/chassis trucks provided by tenderers.
Demonstration units provided were all equipped with 6-speed transmission. These trucks provide a significant increase in Kw of power and torque over the City’s existing trucks. Operational officers assessed that the 6-speed transmission was more than sufficient to meet the requirements of the functions to be performed. On the basis of this assessment, those trucks equipped with 9-speed transmissions were ranked equally as per the assessment made on the relevant make and model truck equipped with a 6-speed transmission.
Cabin ergonomics, visibility and ease to drive were features highly regarded by Operational officers during the assessments. The Isuzu FTR900 submitted by Major Motors was assessed as best meeting these features.
The following table summarises the ranking of operational assessments achieved by the tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
2 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
2 |
Tender |
Rank |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
4 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
4 |
3. Mechanical Assessment
The City currently owns and operates trucks provided by all tenderers. The Fleet Support Officer conducted a mechanical assessment based on historical maintenance records and the backup product support provided to the City by all of the tenderers. All tenders have been assessed as equal for the mechanical assessment.
Following examination of the type of work the trucks are used for, the Fleet Support Officer assessed that a truck equipped with 9-speed transmission does not provide any mechanical advantage nor disadvantage in comparison to a similar truck equipped with a 6-speed transmission.
The following table summarises the ranking of mechanical assessments achieved by the tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
1 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [9 speed transmission] |
1 |
Overall Weighted Score
The following table summarises the Overall Weighted Score ranking achieved by tenders received:
Tender |
Rank |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
1 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [6 speed transmission] |
2 |
Skipper Trucks - Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter 10 [9 speed transmission] |
3 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [6 speed transmission] |
4 |
WA Hino – Hino Series 1527 [9 speed transmission] |
5 |
Consultation
Officers from the City’s Fleet Services, Parks Maintenance and Engineering Maintenance units were consulted as part of the Operational and Mechanical Assessments processes.
Comment
The Mitsubishi FV51 truck with options specified as tendered by Skipper Trucks best meets the City’s requirement for a tandem axle tipper truck and provides the City with the best value.
It is therefore recommended that Council accept the tender from Skipper Trucks (Tender No. 08031) for the Supply and Delivery of One Tandem Axle Tipper Truck with a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Detroit Locker Style Differential and Spare Front Tyre with Carrier.
The Isuzu FTR900 truck with options specified as tendered by Major Motors best meets the City’s requirement for single axle tipper trucks and provides the City with the best value. It is therefore recommended that Council accept the tender from Major Motors (Tender No. 08031) for the Supply and Delivery of Two Single Axle Tipper Trucks with a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Detroit Locker Style/Full Forward Control Differential and Spare Front Tyre with Carrier.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The provision of suitable trucks for Infrastructure – Engineering Maintenance and Parks Maintenance is consistent with the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan (2006-2021) outcomes and objectives.
“Governance 4.3 Improve asset management”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Costs associated with accepting the tender compared to budget are contained in the following tables.
One Tandem Axle Tipper Truck
Funding |
Tender |
Tender Price |
Budget |
Variance Under/(Over) |
Plant Replacement Program 2008/2009 |
Skipper Trucks – Mitsubishi FV51 |
$ 164,690 |
$ 180,000 |
$ 15,310 |
Two Full Forward Control Tipper Trucks
Funding |
Tender |
Tender Price |
Budget |
Variance Under/(Over) |
Plant Replacement Program 2008/2009 |
Major Motors – Isuzu FTR 900 [6 speed transmission] |
$ 217,600 |
$ 260,000 |
$ 42,400 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the tender from Skipper Trucks (Tender No. 08031) for the Supply and Delivery of One Tandem Axle Tipper Truck with a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Detroit Locker Style Differential and Spare Front Tyre with Carrier for the sum of $164,690-00; and
2. ACCEPTS the tender from Major Motors (Tender No. 08031) for the Supply and Delivery of Two Single Axle Tipper Trucks with a Comprehensive Workshop Service Manual, Detroit Locker Style Differential and Spare Front Tyre with Carrier for the sum of $ 217,600-00.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: PR36/0006V01
File Name: AA Tender No 08035 Design and Construction of Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk Connecting Foreshore Vista and Compass.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Coordinator Building Project
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No. 08035 for the Design and Construction of Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk Connecting Foreshore Vista and Compass Circle, Yanchep.
Background
The provision of the Yanchep Dual Use Path is a specific recommendation that has been identified as part of the Yanchep/Two Rocks Foreshore Management Plan. One of the objectives of the Plan is to create connecting path networks to form major north south links for pedestrians and cyclist movements along the foreshore.
A missing link exists between Foreshore Vista and Compass Circle due to this section traversing through a dune network along the Yanchep Foreshore. It is proposed to construct a concrete pathway with a lookout at its northern end and a boardwalk raised above the natural ground contours that will compliment the surrounding natural environment.
The construction of the proposed works is subject to a total design and construction of the works and approval being given by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and Department of Indigenous Affairs (DIA).
The City proposes to enter into a contract with a suitably qualified, experienced and capable company to undertake the design and construction of a concrete pathway, lookout and an elevated boardwalk under a design and construct contract.
The City has been granted:
· Development Approval by the WAPC to construct the boardwalk in accordance with certain conditions; and
· Approval by the DEC to clear vegetation for footpath and boardwalk under the clearing permit - CPS 1974/1 for 0.064 hectares in accordance with certain conditions.
As there is a registered aboriginal site in the vicinity of the proposed works, the City has investigated the need for a Development Approval application with the DIA in accordance with s18 of the Indigenous Heritage Act 1972. The location of the pathway and boardwalk were plotted on the City’s GIS Network, along with details from DIA’s electronic Aboriginal Heritage Sites Register. As the distance between the closest DIA Heritage site, 17599 and the boardwalk is 17.1m, it was determined that an application to DIA was not necessary.
As the cost for the elevated boardwalk is the major component of the project cost, tenderers were required to provide two cost options related to the width of the pathway:
· Option 1 is the preferred option and this provides for a clear walkway of 2.5m horizontal distance between handrails; and
· Option 2 provides a minimal solution with a clear walkway of 2m horizontal distance between handrails. This option was included for consideration by Council should there be a funding constraint with Option 1.
Detail
Tenders Received
Public Tender No. 08035 for the Design and Construction of Yanchep Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk was advertised on Saturday 26 July 2008 and closed at the City’s Offices at 3pm on 19 August 2008 with the receipt of the following submissions:
Tenderers |
Tendered Price Option (2) |
Tendered Price Option (1) |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
$497,160 |
$519,710.00 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
$483,400 |
$566,200.00 |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
$499,819 |
$571,580.00 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
$524,100 |
$604,100.00 |
DME Contractors |
$543,198 |
$621,502.00 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
$708,431 |
$753,128.75 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
$696,725 |
$809,164.00 |
Downer EDI Works |
|
$937,932.59 |
The budget funding for this project is $590,426 and as there are a number of tender submissions within this budget amount, only the tenderers prices for Option (1) with the 2.5m wide boardwalk have been considered.
Tender No 08035 specified that the DIA approval for the works may be required and the price schedule included an item ‘Penalty Cost for Stopping the project at Building Licence Stage’. The financial ramifications for the City should DIA approval not be given for the construction stage to proceed is tabled below:
Tenderers |
Design Cost |
Penalty Cost |
Total Cost if Project Stops at Design Stage |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
$6,750 |
$7,255 |
$14,005 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
$6,000 |
$5,000 |
$11,000 |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
$3,500 |
$25,000 |
$28,500 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
$75,000 |
$25,000 |
$100,000 |
DME Contractors |
$8,500 |
$2,500 |
$11,000 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
Not supplied |
$0.00 |
$24,438 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
Not supplied |
$0.00 |
$178,016 |
Downer EDI Works |
$96,608 |
$6,600 |
$103,208 |
Given the cost penalties that could be applied by Keleman Pty Ltd, Downer EDI Works and Yarnell Pty Ltd should the project not proceed, special considerations in their engagement would be required should any of these firms be considered for the project.
The penalty cost is included as a scheduled item in the fixed lump sum total and now that there is no DIA approval constraint on the project proceeding, this amount can be deducted from the Tendered Price Option (1). The revised Tendered Prices Option (1) are summarised below:
Tenderers |
Cost Saving to each tender if Project Proceeds |
Revised Tendered Price Option (1) with Applied Saving |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
$7,255 |
$512,455 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
$5,000 |
$561,200 |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
$25,000 |
$546,580 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
$25,000 |
$579,100 |
DME Contractors |
$2,500 |
$619,002 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
$0.00 |
$753,129 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
$0.00 |
$809,164 |
Downer EDI Works |
$6,600 |
$931,333 |
Tender Assessment
The Tender Assessment Panel comprising the Coordinator Building Projects, Coordinator Projects Construction and Contracts Officer evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria along with reference checking and risk assessment:
a |
Design Fee and Cost of Construction 1. Including to provide a cost option for the design and construction of the boardwalk; |
25% |
b |
Appreciation for overall Project proposal and project timeframe 2. Understanding of the project scope and requirements; 3. Proposed materials for the boardwalk in this coastal environment; 4. Outline the construction technique proposed that would minimise impact on the dune system; 5. Give relevant examples of previous projects undertaken that are similar in nature; |
25% |
c |
Measures taken to comply with Development Approval and construction technique (environmental impact must be addressed) 6. Give a Gantt timeframe for the physical implementation of this project. The ability to complete construction by the end April 2009 will be favourably considered. Allow 4 weeks for the City to submit the design documentation for Council’s Building Approval; 7. Tenderer’s resources available for this contract |
50% |
a. Design Fee and Cost of Construction
Eight tenders were received with Starr Structures Pty Ltd submitting the lowest tender. The ranking of tenderers based upon Option (1) price and reduced by the cost saving (penalty price) is:
Tenderer |
Ranking Based on Revised Tendered Price Option (1) with Applied Saving |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
1 |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
2 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
3 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
4 |
DME Contractors |
5 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
6 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
7 |
Downer EDI Works |
8 |
b. Appreciation for overall Project proposal and project timeframe
Starr Structures Pty Ltd and PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd were assessed as providing a higher ranking than the other tenderers in offering a sound proposal when assessed against the four qualifying criteria. Both tenderers have the background and experience to undertake the works. The ranking of tenderers based upon Option (1) price and assessment “b” is:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
1 |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
2 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
3 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
4 |
DME Contractors |
5 |
Downer EDI Works |
6 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
7 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
8 |
c. Measures taken to comply with Development Approval and construction technique (environmental impact must be addressed)
There was a lack of understanding by a majority of the tenderers of what was required in the approval by the DEC to clear vegetation for footpath and boardwalk under the clearing permit - CPS 1974/1.
Tenderers who proposed to use wheeled machinery in the fragile dune system to construct the elevated boardwalk were given a reduced assessment value.
The Tender No 08035 clause Principals’ Objective is detailed below:
“In inviting this Tender, it is the City's objective to achieve a purpose built extension to the existing Dual Use Path along the Yanchep coastal reserve that can be maintained by the City and has a reliable and efficient service life for a period of 40 years.”
The Starr Structures Pty Ltd submission utilises 35mm thick pine planking to the boardwalk and this product requires ongoing maintenance and has a 15-year service life. The Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd tender gave no detailed information on what it proposed for its boardwalk stating only that it was “Hot Dip Galvanised steel framework and treated pine timber decking and handrail”.
By contrast PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd fully addressed the call of a 40 year service life by offering a low maintenance high strength aluminium framed structure and flooring system that employs the seawater-proof alloy AIMgSil (EN-AW 6082).
The ranking of Tenderers based upon assessment Option (1) price and assessment “c” is:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
1 |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
2 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
3 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
4 |
DME Contractors |
5 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
6 |
Downer EDI Works |
7 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
8 |
Overall Ranking Assessment
The overall scoring of tenders that is based on a weighted score is shown below:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
1 |
Starr Structures Pty Ltd |
2 |
Yarnell Pty Ltd |
3 |
DME Contractors |
4 |
Keleman Pty Ltd |
5 |
Crowther Family Trust T/AS Urbaneering Pty Ltd |
6 |
Downer EDI Works |
7 |
Landscape Elements Pty Ltd |
8 |
PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd is ranked first for Tender No 08035. This firm offers the preferred option to the City with its lightweight, minimal foundation and long life solution to a boardwalk located in a severe marine environment.
Key Characteristics of the lowest recommended tenderer, PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd
· PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd is presently establishing an Australian presence for its parent German company and the construction of the Yanchep boardwalk will be its first local project.
· PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd is therefore gaining local experience coupling with and using an Australian Registered builder Jack Chamber acting under Reg. No.3766 as Project Manager with Landmark as its partner construction company.
· Neither PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd nor Landmark has previously undertaken any works for the City but Landmark has successfully contracted to several eastern state local authorities.
· A reference check with Gladstone Regional Council provides positive support for the performance of Landmark in Queensland. Local reference check with Shire of Bridgestone-Greenbushes confirms this positive performance by Landmark in its construction of a river bridge spanning 21 metres.
· The firm’s tender breakdown has provided the relevant information and its cost items for common work items such as site establishment; rehabilitation and maintenance are consistent with the prices presented in the other limited site impact submissions. Its primary cost saving stems mainly from its construction and installation of its lightweight aluminium boardwalk structure. Its higher costs are due to placement of that structure into the local environment.
Consultation
The contractor will be required to issue with written notification to all residents affected by the proposed works, setting out the timing of the works, advising details of any disruption, and confirming that reinstatements will be promptly addressed.
Comment
Works Program
The target programme for the design and construction of the works is as follows:
Execute Contract 08035 Tuesday 30 September 2008
Review Contractors Design Process/Programme Friday 3 October 2008
Review and Approval of Developed Concept Friday 17 October 2008
Possession of Site Monday 12 January 2009
Practical Completion (20 weeks) Friday 29 May 2009
Project Completion & Commissioning Friday 12 June 2009
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The successful tenderer will be issued with a Building Licence based upon the City’s assessment. Approvals received from WAPC and DEC exist as tender conditions.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The Construction of Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk Connecting Foreshore Vista and Compass Circle, Yanchep is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) outcomes and objectives:
“1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
1.5.3.1.1 Promote urban design that creates attractive and distinctive neighbourhoods;
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options;
2.1.2.1.1.1 Provide timely and functional public facilities and open spaces to meet changing community needs”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Cost consideration for the design and construction of the Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk works at Yanchep is given in the table below;
Tender No 08035 – Yanchep Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk |
||
Description |
Project Costs |
Project Funding |
PR-1450 - 2008/09 Budget |
|
$590,426 |
Conforming Tender – PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd |
$546,580 |
|
Rehabilitation and associated works |
$15,000 |
|
Contingencies |
$10,000 |
|
Project Management Charges |
$15,000 |
|
Tender Advertisement & Administration Costs |
$1,500 |
|
Total Project Cost |
$588,080 |
|
Total Project Funding 08/09 |
|
$590,426 |
Balance of Funding |
|
$2,346 |
Administration recommends that the tender for the construction of the Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk Works (Option 1) at Yanchep be awarded to PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd for its tender sum of $546,580.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 08035 for the Design and Construction of Foreshore Pathway and Boardwalk Connecting Foreshore Vista and Compass Circle, Yanchep (Option 1 – 2.5m wide Boardwalk and Pathway) from PML Light Constructions Pty Ltd for the tender sum of $546,580.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: C08037V01
File Name: AA Tender No 08037 Provision of Glass and Glazing Services for a Period of Three Years.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Mark Stevens
Meeting Date: 23 Sept 2008
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08037 for the Provision of Glass and Glazing Services for the City of Wanneroo for a Period of Three Years.
Background
The provision of glass and glazing maintenance and installation services and the supply of glass and glazing related products for the City’s building assets has been addressed in the past by the awarding of term contracts. These services are currently being provided through Contract No 04390 - the Provision of Glass and Glazing Services within the City of Wanneroo, commencing from 1 October 2004 for a three year period, awarded to Mobile Glass and Glazing.
This tender is for the maintenance and installation of glass and glazing services and products for all City owned building assets.
The existing contract was reviewed at a meeting with stakeholders resulting in the following inclusions to the tender documentation:
· Additional items were included to reflect the improved materials and technology available in this industry.
· An allowance for CPI increases should an extension of contract be offered.
· Updated list of City building assets.
The objectives of the contract are to:
· Provide timely specialist glass and glazing services to the City;
· Provide effective breakdown call out response and rectification;
· Carry out and implement works to comply with statutory and legal responsibilities;
· Maintain and improve the levels of security and safety, energy efficiency and aesthetic appeal within the City’s building assets;
· Supply and replace faulty items and materials; and
· Provide a single point of responsibility for glazing maintenance and repairs.
In accordance with the existing contract a one-year extension was executed. Therefore the current contract expires on 30 September 2008 and tenders were invited for the Provision of Glass and Glazing Services for a Period of Three Years.
Detail
Tender No 08037 was advertised on 2 August 2008 and closed on Tuesday 19 August 2008.
Essential details of the new contract are shown in the following table:
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
Three years with the option of a further extension of one year |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2008 |
Expiry Date |
30 September 2011 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes - 12 months to 30 September 2012 |
Rise and Fall Included |
No – (CPI to apply to extension) |
Tenders were received from:
· O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd
· Mobile Glass and Glazing
· Wanneroo Glass
· Davey Glass
· Glazewell Pty Ltd
Tender Evaluation
A Tender Evaluation Team comprising the City’s Coordinator Building Maintenance, Contracts Officer and Building Officer has evaluated tenders in accordance with the evaluation criteria.
As part of the evaluation process and following analysis of the tender submissions an evaluation matrix has been provided in accordance with the following selection criteria and weighting:
Item |
Description |
Weighting |
1 |
Price |
55% |
2 |
Technical Competence and Experience |
20% |
3 |
Capacity to Manage the Contract |
15% |
4 |
Tenderers financial position |
10% |
All submissions were assessed to be conforming.
The tenders were evaluated through discussion and each submission awarded a point score on a consensual basis.
Each category of the Selection Criteria was scored on the basis of the tenderer’s performance from either the submitted tender or comments from previous contracts or clients.
The Tender Evaluation Team reported as follows:
1. Price
This was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer in relation to the individual items and materials prices, labour and mark up rates, after hours minimum call out charge and percentage mark up applied to outsourced materials and labour.
An overall ranking was determined by assessing prices contained within the submission schedule. The projected quantities were developed from current maintenance usage data. These quantities were then costed against prices supplied by each contractor.
Based on the above factors and the tender submissions, the total calculated estimate of costs for the three years of the contract are as follows:
Tenderer |
Total Calculated Cost |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
$240,271.67 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
$243,695.00 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
$264,137.10 |
Wanneroo Glass |
$309,242.50 |
Davey Glass |
$330,395.00 |
This criterion represents 55% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Overall Price Ranking
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
2 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
3 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
4 |
Wanneroo Glass |
5 |
Davey Glass |
2. Technical Competence and Experience
The tenders were assessed on the tenderers’ experience with previous contracts completed of a similar size and nature, experience of key personnel and references. The assessment of this criterion also considered the resources currently available to the tenderer to fulfil the contract, including the number of personnel, direct and subcontracted labour, trade disciplines and qualifications/training of staff.
O’Brien Glass provided evidence of the required experience in this area in the form of large scale contract works in the insurance sector over a period of many years.
The experience of O’Brien Glass’ key personnel assigned to this contract and the numbers of staff in the trade and support areas available to provide services to the City was rated as high.
This criterion represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
2 |
Davey Glass |
Rank |
Tenderer |
3 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
4 |
Wanneroo Glass |
5 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
3. Capacity to Manage Contract
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ management control systems, occupation health and safety, job safety analysis, risk management, communications and staff resources at all levels including office and workshop support.
Included in the O’Brien Glass submission were examples of documents showing the risk assessments undertaken by staff and communications between staff and management.
The level of resources committed by O’Brien Glass to carry out the services within the contract included three levels of management and is highly satisfactory and deemed as more than adequate to meet the demands required.
This criterion represents 15% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
2 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
3 |
Wanneroo Glass |
4 |
Davey Glass |
5 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
4. Tenderer’s Financial Position
Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ period of trading and financial capacity.
O’Brien Glass, Mobile Glass and Glazing and Davey Glass each provided equally rated responses and detailed information in their respective submissions.
This criterion represents 10% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
1 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
1 |
Davey Glass |
2 |
Wanneroo Glass |
3 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
Overall Weighted Scoring
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tenderer against the above-established criteria. The overall ranking of the tenders based on a weighted score out of 100 is as follows:
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
2 |
Mobile Glass and Glazing |
3 |
Glazewell Pty Ltd |
4 |
Wanneroo Glass |
5 |
Davey Glass |
Based on the above evaluation results, O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd has provided the best value tender.
Reference Check
As O’Brien Glass Industries has not worked for the City in the past, reference checking was conducted. Referees described O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd as a strong performing company in both the operational and administration processes.
Comment
Tenders have been evaluated in accordance with evaluation criteria and O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd has provided the most suitable tender.
It is recommended that the Tender No 08037 from O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd for the Provision of Glass and Glazing Services for a Period of Three Years be accepted in accordance with the tender evaluation results. The tender submission from O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd demonstrated that it possesses the resources and capabilities to best fulfil the contract requirements.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of section 3.57 of the Local Government Act. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
The Manager Contracts and Property has viewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The Provision of Glass and Glazing Services to building assets is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) goals and strategies:
“Governance
4.3 Improve Asset Management
Develop and apply asset management principles to support the maintenance and management of public infrastructure and other assets.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The expenditure associated with glass and glazing services on City assets is an operational cost, which is accommodated in the relevant maintenance budgets each financial year.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 08037 from O’Brien Glass Industries Ltd for the Provision of Glass and Glazing Services as per the Schedule of Rates and General Conditions of Contract, for a period of three years from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2011, with an option to extend the contract for a further 12 months to 30 September 2012.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: 08039V01
File Name: AA Tender No 08039 For The Supply Delivery and Fitting of Tyres For a Period of One 1 Year.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: COW1065
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08039 – The Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres for a Period of One Year from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009.
Background
The supply, delivery and fitting of tyres for the City’s 420 owned fleet of heavy and light vehicles, plant and equipment has been addressed in the past by the awarding of term contracts.
The objectives of the contract are for:
· Supply and delivery of tyres and associated items;
· Fitting of tyres and associated items at the Ashby Operations Centre;
· Attendance to on site breakdown repairs;
· Wheel balancing at the Ashby Operations Centre; and
· Fleet tyre management inspections.
Other Local Authorities who do not have the in-house specialist tyre fitting capabilities also outsource these services under a supply, delivery and fitting contract and as part of this process the City has previously awarded the following contract:
Contract No 06050 - The Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres at the City of Wanneroo, for a Period of One Year commencing 1 October 2006.
Contract No 06050 contained a one year extension option clause. Subsequently in September 2007, the following recommendation was approved by the Director Infrastructure under delegated authority:
“In accordance with clause 36 – Extension of Contracts of the City of Wanneroo delegated authority register … Director Infrastructure has granted approval to accept a 12 month extension to Contract 06050 with Beaurepaires commencing on the 1 October 2007 to the 30 September 2008, in accordance with the same terms and conditions of Contract 06050 with no increase to the current Contract rates as per the Price Schedules.”
The City also provides supply, delivery and fitting of tyres to the City of Joondalup fleet assets under a Fleet Maintenance Service Level Agreement which is due to expire in December 2008.
Detail
Tender No 08039 was advertised on 08 August 2008 and closed on Tuesday 26 August 2008.
Essential details of the new contract are shown in the following table:
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
One year with the option of a further extension of one year |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2008 |
Expiry Date |
30 September 2009 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes - 12 months to 30 September 2010 |
Rise and Fall Included |
No |
A mandatory site visit for tenderers was carried out during the tender period on a scheduled basis. Tenders were received from the companies listed as follows:
· Tyres 4U Pty. Ltd.
· Beaurepaires
· Complete Tyre Solutions
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising the Manager Waste and Fleet Services, Fleet and Stores Supervisor and Coordinator Fleet Services, has evaluated the tenders in accordance with the following selection criteria and weighting:
Item |
Description |
Weighting |
1 |
Prices for the specified services offered |
60% |
2 |
Previous experience |
10% |
3 |
Tenderer’s resources |
20% |
4 |
Safety management |
5% |
5 |
Quality assurance systems |
5% |
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tender against the established criteria and reported as follows:
1. Prices for the specified services offered
This was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer in relation to the base tender price for the supply of tyres and associated items, labour rates and after-hours minimum call out charge.
An overall ranking was determined by assessing prices contained within the schedules based on the nominated amounts of those products previously purchased by the City in the tender schedules and the rates submitted. Tenderers failed to submit rates for various minor items and a reasonable allowance has been made for this in the estimates.
Based on the above factors and the tender submissions, the total calculated estimated costs for the one-year contract are as follows:
Tenderer |
Estimated Total Price |
Tyres4U |
$573,362.32 |
Beaurepaires |
$575,018.92 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
$583,229.50 |
This criterion represents 60% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Tyres 4U |
1 |
Beaurepaires |
2 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
3 |
2 Previous Experience
The tenders were assessed on the tenderers’ experience with previous contracts completed of a similar nature and references from satisfied clients who are willing to support the tenderer.
Beaurepaires is the City’s current contractor and has provided satisfactory supply, delivery and fitting of tyres service to the City of Wanneroo over the past 14 years. Beaurepaires also has other Contracts that include waste management vehicles, which is a specialist area that the City requires.
Each category of the Selection Criteria was awarded a point score on the basis of the tenderer’s performance from either the submitted tender or comments from their other contracts or clients.
The relevant experience each tenderer has in offering similar type services was assessed. This criterion represents 10% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Beaurepaires |
1 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
2 |
Tyres4U |
2 |
3 Tenderers’ Resources
The tenderers’ resources were examined in order to evaluate their ability to meet the requirements of the Contract.
Beaurepaires is a large national company with a significant number of tyre fitters and stores. Beaurepaires is located near to the City, being based in Malaga, whilst Complete Tyre Solutions is based in Cockburn and Tyres4U is based in Ashfield. Tyres4U has based its tender on using a subcontractor located in Landsdale for the fitting of tyres.
This criterion represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Beaurepaires |
1 |
Tyres4U |
2 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
2 |
4 Safety Management
Evidence of safety management policies and practices was assessed from the tender documents.
This criterion represents 5% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Tyres4U |
1 |
Beaurepaires |
2 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
2 |
5 Quality Assurance Systems
Tenderers’ approach to quality, understanding of quality and quality systems were assessed.
Beaurepaires is one of the largest retail operations in Australia to be accredited to ISO 9001 2000 quality standards. Tyres4U is only quality assured for tyre supply and did not submit any quality assurance documentation relating to fitting services. It was not obvious in the tender documentation that Complete Tyre Solutions is quality assured.
This criterion represents 5% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Beaurepaires |
1 |
Tyres4U |
2 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
3 |
Overall Weighted Scoring
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tenderer against the above-established criteria. The overall scoring of the tenders based on a weighted score is as follows:
Tenderer |
Rank |
Beaurepaires |
1 |
Tyres4U |
2 |
Complete Tyre Solutions |
3 |
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
Based on overall ranking of tenders, it is recommended that the tender from Beaurepaires for the Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres for a Period of One Year be accepted. The tender from Beaurepaires is recommended as it provides the best overall value to the City.
Beaurepaires has been the tyre services contractor for the City of Wanneroo for the past 14 years and is considered to have the products, ability and resources to complete the project in accordance with the requirements of the tender documentation.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of section 3.57 of the Local Government Act. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres to the City’s fleet assets is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) goals and strategies:
“Governance
4.3 Improve asset management”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
The expenditure associated with the supply, delivery and fitting of tyres on the City’s fleet assets is an operational cost, which is accommodated in the Fleet Maintenance budgets each financial year.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 08039 from Beaurepaires for the Supply, Delivery and Fitting of Tyres as per the schedule of rates and general conditions of tendering, for a period of one year from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009, with an option to extend the contract for a further 12 months to 30 September 2010 at the Council’s discretion.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R22/0011VO1
File Name: BA Parking Prohibitions Rosslare Promenade Mindarie.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the installation of parking prohibitions in Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie.
Background
Rosslare Promenade is a 6-metre wide local access street that serves the northern head of the Mindarie Boat Harbour. The road is constructed as a cul de sac with Rosslare Park located on the northern side of the turning bulb and Rosslare Beach located on the south side.
Rosslare Promenade is further extended beyond the turning bulb by Clarecastle Retreat, which is constructed as an access place to provide access to residential lots.
Rosslare Park provides passive recreational facilities and includes a car park. Bollards are installed along the south side of the road to prevent verge parking adjacent to the beach.
Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan identifying the subject area.
Detail
Administration has been made aware, through complaints to Councillors, that local residents are concerned that users of the Rosslare Beach are parking on Rosslare Promenade rather than using the car park provided, and that this activity is causing an unsafe situation where the road becomes congested and children are crossing between parked and moving vehicles.
Consultation
These parking prohibitions were developed in response to local residents concerns for road safety, particularly that of local children who use the beach.
Comment
Administration believes that parking on Rosslare Promenade within the turning bulb and adjacent to the beach is an unsafe practice considering the adjoining land use and the number of vehicle movements that take place in the confined space. On this basis, it is proposed that “No Parking – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-2) signs be installed on Rosslare Promenade as shown on Drawing No 2392-1-0 as Attachment 2.
Council has approved two Parking Inspector positions in the 2008/2009 budget, which should assist with the enforcement of parking restrictions.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003(as amended).
Strategic Implications
The proposal installation of parking prohibitions on Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie, is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost to install the proposed parking prohibitions is $600, which will be funded from Project No PR – 1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “No Parking – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-2) signs on Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie, as shown in Drawing 2392-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers); and
2. ADVISES the local residents of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Area of Interest
LOCATION MAP – Rosslare Promenade, Mindarie
ATTACHMENT 2
PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Rosslare Promenade
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R34/0007; R34/0062
File Name: BA Parking Prohibitions Church Street and Shaw Road Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider alterations to the parking prohibitions and ‘Kiss & Drive’ facilities in Shaw Road and Church Street provided for the Wanneroo Primary School.
Background
Since the Wanneroo Primary School moved to its current site the City has established ‘Kiss and Drive’ facilities on both Church Street (IN06-04/06 refers) and Shaw Road (IN014-06/07 refers).
In May 2008, the Wanneroo Primary School Roadwise Committee (WPSR Committee) approached the City seeking further assistance in reorganising the ‘Kiss and Drive’ facilities and parking prohibitions provided around the boundary of the school to reduce the accident risks to the students.
The City of Wanneroo Roadwise Advisory Committee at its 20 August 2008 meeting also recommended “that a report be submitted to Council at its meeting scheduled 23 September 2008 by Administration to address this issue.”
Detail
The WPSR Committee is concerned that the current ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility located within the Shaw Road cul-de-sac brings students and vehicles into conflict in a confined space and increases the risk of accidents.
The Committee also believes that the Church Street ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility has failed to achieve its purpose due to its location close to the school crossover into the pre-school car park. The mix of conflicting movements occurring along a short section of road has prevented the ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility from operating as intended.
The Committee proposes to centralise the ‘Kiss and Drive’ function at the one facility on Shaw Road.
A large parking embayment on Shaw Road is currently signed as a bus zone and is reserved for school buses. The bus zone is active between 8.00AM to 6.00PM daily. Two school buses and the ‘Kids Biz’ after school childcare bus service the school, each of which on average take only 15 minutes each morning and afternoon to drop-off and pick-up students. This results in a parking facility that has only minimal usage.
The general parking stalls on Shaw Road currently have no time restriction and there have been issues with residents opposite the school using the parking embayments for the long term parking of commercial vehicles. This in turn reduces the available parking spaces available to parents at critical times.
The City has also had legal advice that some older signage (‘NO STOPPING - ROAD OR VERGE’) on the corner of Shaw Road and Keane Street has been challenged on the grounds that the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law uses the term nature strip instead of verge. The advice is that while the older signs are still legally valid they may be open to interpretation in a Magistrates Court and that the signs should be changed to ensure clarity.
Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan identifying the subject area.
Consultation
Administration has developed the proposed changes in consultation with the WPSR Committee.
Comment
Administration accepts the recommendation of the WPSR Committee that the Church Street ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility is not functioning as intended and the space would be better used for general parking.
Administration in early discussions recommended to the WPSR Committee that the Shaw Road ‘Kiss and Drive’ be relocated outside the cul-de-sac where a better vehicle circulation pattern can be established. The removal of the ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility from the cul-de-sac also removes a significant number of vehicles from a high student pedestrian precinct. Administration recommends that the under-utilised bus zone be used for the new ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility.
Both Administration and the WPSR Committee believe that the same parking embayment can be used for the ‘Kiss and Drive’ and the school buses, as the school buses in general arrive after the main ‘Kiss and Drive’ demand has abated.
The ‘Kiss and Drive’ concept is an initiative of Roadwise and is not supported by either the Road Traffic Code or the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law. In order to enable the City’s Rangers to enforce compliance with the intent of the facility it has been Council practice to impose a 3 minute parking restriction within the ‘Kiss and Drive’ zone. As it is intended to use the same area for the ‘Kiss and Drive’ and for the school buses, which may take longer than 3 minutes, it is proposed the restriction be amended to ‘5 Min Parking – Buses Exempted’.
It is then proposed that the existing Shaw Road ‘Kiss and Drive’ facility revert to general parking.
In order to make sure the maximum number of parking space is available during the school peak periods Administration believes that 30 minute time restricted parking prohibitions should be implemented in the Shaw Road parking embayments opposite the residential housing to prevent it being used for long term parking.
The proposed parking prohibitions for Church Street and Shaw Road are shown on Drawing No T1620-9-2 (Attachment 2) and Drawing No 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3) respectively.
Council has approved two Parking Inspector positions in the 2008/2009 budget, which should assist with the enforcement of timed parking restrictions, such as those proposed in Church Street and Shaw Road.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003(as amended).
Strategic Implications
The proposal changes to the parking prohibitions on Shaw Road and Church Street, Wanneroo, is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost of signs and pavement marking contained in this proposal is $2,000, which is to be funded from Project No PR – 1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking Upgrade.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the removal of the “Kiss & Drive” facility on the southern side of Church Street and its conversion to general parking stalls as shown in Drawing T1620-9-2 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. APPROVES the removal of the “3 Min Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM. SCHOOL DAYS” and ”Kiss and Drive” signs applicable to the “Kiss & Drive” facility on the southern side of Church Street as shown in Drawing T1620-9-2 (Attachment 2 refers);
3. APPROVES the removal of “15MIN Parking, 7.30-8.30AM, SCHOOL DAYS” signs on the southern side of Church Street as shown in Drawing T1620-9-2 (Attachment 2 refers);
4. APPROVES the installation of “1/4 Hour Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM. SCHOOL DAYS, ” (R5-15) signs on the southern side of Church Street as shown in Drawing T1620-9-2 (Attachment 2 refers);
5. APPROVES the removal of the “Kiss & Drive” facility on the northern side of Shaw Road and its conversion to parking stalls as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
6. APPROVES the removal of “3 Min Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM. SCHOOL DAYS” and “KISS and DRIVE” signs applicable the “Kiss & Drive” facility on the northern side of Shaw Road as shown in Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
7. APPROVES the removal of the bus parking zone on the northern side of Shaw Road and its conversion to a “Kiss and Drive” facility as shown on Drawing No 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
8. APPROVES the removal of the “NO PARKING, BUS ZONE, 8am-6pm” signs on the northern side of Shaw Road, opposite 14-16 Shaw Road, as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
9. APPROVES the installation of “5 Min Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS, BUSES EXEMPTED” (R5-13) and “KISS and DRIVE” signs on the northern side of Shaw Road, opposite 14-16 Shaw Road and aligned with the proposed “Kiss & Drive” facility, as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
10. APPROVES the installation of “1/2 Hour Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-16) signs on the northern side of Shaw Road, opposite 16-20 Shaw Road, as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
11. APPROVE the installation of 10 metres and 2 metres of yellow “No Stopping” edge lines along the northern kerb line of Shaw Road as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
12. APPROVES the replacement of the “No Stopping – Road or Verge” signs on the corners of Shaw Road and Keane Street with “No Stopping – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-35) signs as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
13. APPROVES the replacement of the “No Stopping” signs on the northwest corner of Shaw Road and Frederick Road with “No Stopping – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-35) signs as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers);
14. APPROVES the installation of “No Stopping – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-35) signs on the northeast corner of Shaw Road and Frederick Road as shown on Drawing 2143-1-2 (Attachment 3 refers); and
15. ADVISES the Principal of the Wanneroo Primary School of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Area of Interest
LOCATION MAP – Parking Prohibitions – Church Street & Shaw Road, Wanneroo
ATTACHMENT 2
PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Church Street, Wanneroo
ATTACHMENT 3
PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Shaw Road, Wanneroo
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R17/0015
File Name: BA Parking Prohibitions Southmead Drive Landsdale.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the installation of parking prohibitions in Southmead Drive, Landsdale.
Background
Landsdale Primary School is located on a rectangular lot bounded on the east by Warradale Terrace, on the south by The Broadway, on the west by Southmead Drive, and to the north by Warradale Park. Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan identifying the subject area.
Parking prohibitions were first implemented on the roads bordering the school in February 2004 (TS10-02/04 refers). The parking prohibitions were developed in consultation with the Landsdale Primary School Roadwise Committee. Refer Attachment 2 for a copy of the existing parking prohibition plans.
Detail
In May 2008 the Principal of the Landsdale Primary School requested the City implement parking prohibitions on Southgate Drive opposite Cantrell Circuit.
The request was made because parents were observed parking on the footpath, blocking student access to the path and causing damage to the grassed verge, the footpath and park reticulation.
Consultation
The proposed parking prohibitions were developed in response to a request from the Principal of the Landsdale Primary School.
Comment
The subject area had been excluded from the original parking prohibition plan in recognition that parking is always at a premium around primary schools and it was hoped parents would use the area responsibly.
Administration now believes the parking prohibitions on Southmead Drive are necessary to provide a safe path network for the Landsdale Primary School students and to protect the City’s assets from further damage. It is proposed that ‘No Standing – Road or Nature Strip’ (R5-35) signs be installed on the eastern side of Southmead Drive opposite Cantrell Crescent, as shown on Drawing No T1995-1-3 as Attachment 3.
Council has approved two Parking Inspector positions in the 2008/2009 budget, which should assist with the enforcement of the parking restrictions in Southmead Road.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003(as amended).
Strategic Implications
The proposed installation of parking prohibitions on Southmead Drive, Landsdale, is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost to install the proposed parking prohibitions is $200, which will be funded from Project No PR – 1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking Upgrade.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “No Standing – Road or Nature Strip” (R5-35) signs on Southmead Drive, Landsdale, as shown in Drawing T1955-1-3 (Attachment 3 refers); and
2. ADVISES the Principal of the Landsdale Primary School of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Area of Interest
LOCATION MAP – Southmead Drive, Landsdale
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 of 2
EXISTING PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Cantrell Circuit, Landsdale
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 2
EXISTING PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Warradale Terrace, Landsdale
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
PROPOSED PARKING PROHIBITIONS – Southmead Drive, Landsdale
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R34/0051
File Name: BA Wanneroo South Traffic Management Ocean Reef Road and Backshall Place.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the installation of a seagull island in the Ocean Reef Road median at the Backshall Place intersection.
Background
Ocean Reef Road is an ‘Other Regional Road’ under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and is vested in the City. It currently runs from Marmion Avenue in the west, crosses the Mitchell Freeway (Freeway) and extends to Hartman Drive in the east. It functions as a District Distributor road in the Main Roads WA Metropolitan Functional Road Hierarchy and has a posted speed limit of 80km/h between the City’s boundary with the City of Joondalup and Hartman Drive.
The Backshall Place intersection is intended to provide access from the Regent Estate subdivisions (Estates), in southern Wanneroo, to Ocean Reef Road and hence to the Freeway.
Ocean Reef Road has been constructed as a 4-lane dual carriageway with a 9-metre median, while the Backshall Place intersection is constructed as a full function ‘T’ intersection with right and left turn lanes. Traffic volumes through the intersection are currently above 3000 vehicles per day.
Traffic management works throughout the Estates were first approved by Council in October 2005 (IN04-10/05 refers) and have been progressively implemented during 2006 to 2007. Those approved works have now been fully implemented.
Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan identifying the subject area.
Detail
The Backshall Place intersection with Ocean Reef Road was provided as part of the Approved Structure Plan and was intended to allow local access from the Estates to Ocean Reef Road and hence to the Freeway.
Unfortunately the connection has attracted road users from outside the Estates who are seeking an easier route to the Freeway than that previously available through the Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road intersection. It is anticipated that the current upgrade works to the Wanneroo Road/Ocean Reef Road intersection, being undertaken by MRWA, will provide a safer and more convenient route to the Freeway and restore the traffic volumes through the Estates to more appropriate levels.
The traffic accident statistics from Main Roads WA (MRWA) record that there have been five reported accidents at the Ocean Reef Road/Backshall Place intersection over the five year period 2003 to 2007. Of these accidents, one resulted in a fatality; two in hospitalisation, one required medical attention and the remaining two accidents resulted in property damage only.
The majority of these accidents occurred on the east bound carriageway as vehicles from Backshall Place attempted to cross to the median break on Ocean Reef Road.
It has been observed that more than one vehicle at a time often occupies the median break on Ocean Reef Road. This practice results in one vehicle blocking the sightlines of the other to approaching vehicles.
Consultation
No public consultation was undertaken in the development of this proposal as there are no properties directly affected by the proposed works; and the seagull island treatment is a common treatment on this class of road.
Comment
Administration believes this proposal to install a seagull island in the Backshall Place median break on Ocean Reef Road will increase the overall safety of the intersection (Attachment 2 refers).
Seagull islands are often used in a median break to increase channelisation and control of traffic and thereby prevent the undesirable practise of multiple vehicles trying to occupy the same median break at the one time. The island also provides a physical separation of those vehicles turning right off the through road from those turning right from the side street.
Channelisation is often used as a tool to enhance safety as it reduces the options or decisions a driver can take. At a busy intersection, which requires multiple decisions from a driver, the limiting of choice makes the decision process simpler.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The proposed installation of a seagull island in the Backshall Place median break on Ocean Reef Road is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost to install a seagull island in the Backshall Place median break on Ocean Reef Road is $10,000, to be funded from Project No PR – 1138, Install Traffic Treatments - South Wanneroo, which is specifically for the Regent Estate area.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the installation of a seagull island in the Backshall Place median break on Ocean Reef Road, as shown in Attachment 2, at an estimated cost of $10,000 with the works funded from Project No PR1138 - Install Traffic Treatments – South Wanneroo.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Area of Interest
LOCATION MAP – South Wanneroo Traffic Management
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
CONCEPT PLAN – South Wanneroo Traffic Management
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0204V01, R15/0007V01
File Name: GA Petition PT06 07 08 Objection to Removal of Pavers from Front Verge Adjacent 40 46 Hampshire Drive Jindalee.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Brian Gee
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the issues raised in Petition No PT06-07/08 objecting to the proposed removal of pavers from the front verge of property numbers 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee.
Background
The nature strip (verge) is the area between the private property boundary and the edge of the road. Through the City’s Local Laws, the responsibility for maintaining the nature strip is transferred to the adjoining property owner. The City is responsible for the care, control and management of the nature strip and is responsible for ensuring that it is safe for use by the adjoining residents, public and public utilities. There is no obligation on the City to provide or maintain landscaping to the satisfaction of an adjoining resident.
The City received a written objection from a local resident dated 18 April 2008, regarding the hard stand treatments on the nature strip outside properties 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee. Following an inspection of the properties it was confirmed that the treatments do not comply with the City’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, Part 8-Activities in Thoroughfares. As a result, letters were issued to the affected property owners requesting them to remove the non-compliant components of their treatments. The affected property owners have now presented a Petition (Number PT 06-07/08) to the Council on this matter.
Detail
Following a written objection from a local resident pertaining to the extent of paving on the nature strip and whether the paving was in accordance with the City’s polices outside 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee a site inspection was undertaken to confirm compliance with the following Local Laws of the City:
· Local Government Act 1995 Local Government & Public Property Local Law 1999, Part 8 Activities in Thoroughfares.
In addition to the City’s Local Laws, the City’s Standard Drawing No TS07-9-01, Attachment 1 refers, that relates to residential treatments was also considered.
The site visit confirmed that each property had various treatments that contravened the City’s Policy as detailed below:
· 46 Hampshire Drive - Issues included: nature strip fully paved and trees planted up to kerb edge.
· 52 Hampshire Drive - Issues included: nature strip fully paved and raised wall.
· 54 Hampshire Drive - Issues included: nature strip fully paved and planting on verge area up to kerb edge.
The properties’ nature strip treatments do not comply with the City’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999. The City does not proactively monitor and enforce Section 8 of the Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, however there is a process in place to respond to any complaints that are received.
The process of responding to complaints begins with a site inspection by a City officer. A written confirmation, detailing any illegal treatments is then sent out to the affected property owner. This letter requires the property owner to make the required changes to their treatments normally within 14 days. If no action to rectify the treatment has been forthcoming, a second site visit and subsequent letter is issued which confirms details of the first letter and grants the property owner a final 14 day period to comply. If following this process, the non-compliant treatment remains in place, the City is obliged under the Local Law to remove the treatment and restore the nature strip to sand. At any time should the property owner contact the City to request additional time to comply with the Local Law, based on reasons outlined, an extension is considered and the process suspended to the agreed timeframe.
Following site inspections, in accordance with the process outlined above, letters were issued to each property owner advising them of the specific details of the non-compliant component of their nature strip treatments. Petition No PT06-07/08 - “Objection to Removal of Pavers from Front Verge Adjacent to 46 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee” was presented to Council on 29 July 2008. The process to remove the non-conforming elements of their nature strip treatment is currently in abeyance, pending the outcome of this petition.
The main issues that were raised in this petition and the Administration’s responses are detailed below:
ISSUES |
RESPONSE |
The residents of 46,52 & 54 Hampshire Drive feel singled out because hardstand treatments of other properties that have similar verges to their own that are ‘fully paved but are very scruffy and unattractive’ and have not received letters from the City requiring them to comply. |
Residents are not specifically targeted for non-compliant nature strip treatments, however the City responds to all matters reported on the issues of non-compliant treatments to rectify any compliance issues associated with the Local Law and this has been the case in this instance. |
That a ‘small complaint’ from the public has resulted in threatening letters to remove the pavers within two weeks and install lawn. |
The City issues a minimum of two letters and grants a minimum of 28 days for property owners to comply with the City’s Local Laws. As the obligation for the safety of residents and the public can be compromised through illegal nature strip treatments this timeframe is considered reasonable |
Residents do not consider the City’s concern over trees along the verge side of the road being hazardous obstructing incoming and outgoing traffic and trees and bushes located along the walking pavement creating a potential risk as anyone could be hiding in the bushes. |
The City’s Local Laws prohibit the planting of trees and shrubs 1.5m from the kerb face and any planting which exceeds a height of 600mm. This type of planting restricts the clear sight visibility of pedestrians or motorists in the vicinity of intersection corners and bends in the thoroughfare, making it non-compliant with the City’s Local Laws and should be addressed. |
Despite numerous calls to the City, the empty land that had overgrown plants causing snails to cross the lawn and eat their plants and on windy days would blow sand across the street and mice entering their homes never being addressed by the City. |
With respect to vacant land it is the responsibility of the developer to ensure all wind borne sand is controlled and the City’s Land Development Unit issues instructions to the responsible consulting engineers, as applicable. |
Clause 63 being outdated with today’s lifestyle |
Clause 63 of the Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, contains the City’s Remedy for Breach. This is considered vital in providing the City with the authority to rectify breaches of the local laws and is not considered out of date |
Excess storm water run off from roofs not being a requirement of the City’s local laws for containment purposes. |
Though there is no specific type of treatment suggested by the City in relation to the stormwater from property roofs. However, the City’s Private Property Local Law 2001 Part 13, sub section 2 states: “A Person shall not allow storm water or other waste water to discharge onto: · (a) An adjoining lot without the current approval of the adjoining owner; or · (b) On to a road reserve or other property under the care, control and management of the local government without the approval of the local government.” |
The City not having adequate stormwater or recycling facility in place |
The City’s stormwater facilities are considered adequate to cope with normal storm water patterns for stormwater runoff from the road surfaces. |
The need to park 6 vehicles at a property |
The City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 contain the permitted parking allowances outside residential properties. It is however noted that the verge area should be kept clear of vehicles 1.5m from the kerb edge |
Mulch had to be changed at least four times a year |
All nature strip treatments that are installed require some form of maintenance. It is not uncommon for the topping up of mulch, weeding and litter removal to be undertaken as considered necessary. |
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The City is responsible to ensure that the nature strip is in a safe condition for use by the adjoining residents, public and public utilities. However, due to significant resource requirements that are necessary to adequately monitor and enforce the verge treatment guidelines, the City does not have a formal and regular enforcement system. The consequence of this is that there are numerous verge treatments that have been installed that do not currently comply with the City’s Local Laws as detailed in the Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, Part 8 - Activities in Thoroughfares. However, the City fulfils its obligations when any specific breach is brought to the City’s notice.
The issues raised in this petition are in relation to the perceived grievances and disappointments of the property owners of 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee.
The City’s stormwater drainage systems are designed to accommodate the stormwater runoff from road and footpath surfaces only. Runoff from verges that are fully sealed will overload the system. This will result in an increase in the width of flow in the road channels adjoining the kerb during normal rain events and the increased risk of flooding in storm events
The City has researched the Local Laws of other Councils to obtain details of their verge treatment polices which are detailed below:
City of Joondalup |
Permits an area of 3.0m width x length of property to be treated as hardstand. |
City of Gosnells
|
The installation over no more than one third of the area of the verge (excluding any vehicle crossing) of an acceptable material and the planting and maintenance of either a lawn or a garden on the balance of the verge. |
City of Canning |
Permits a “hard verge over a portion of the area of verge with an acceptable material and plant and maintain either a lawn or garden on the balance…” |
Town of Cottesloe
|
Paving of generally only one third of the residential verge area, including the crossover is permitted. Verges adjacent to approved commercial premises may exceed this providing the area is broken up with landscaping to adjacent areas or around approved street trees. |
City of Bayswater |
The installation over no more than one third of the area of the verge (excluding any vehicle crossing) of an acceptable material and the planting and maintenance of either a lawn or a garden on the balance of the verge. – “Acceptable material – defined as any material which will create a hard surface...”
|
City of Belmont |
The installation over no more than one third of the area of the verge (excluding any vehicle crossing) of an acceptable material and the planting and maintenance of either a lawn or a garden on the balance of the verge |
Town of Victoria Park
|
Paving material is limited to 25 percent of the verge area, excluding the crossover. |
City of Rockingham |
The installation over no more than one third of the area of the verge (excluding any vehicle crossing) of an acceptable material and the planting and maintenance of either a lawn or a garden on the balance of the verge |
The Local Laws of the Authorities listed above do not permit paving on the full verge area. The City of Stirling however, does allow paving on the full verge area, in accordance with strict regulations, which are listed below. In addition the City of Rockingham has amended its policies to permit fully paved verge areas subject to similar regulations as imposed by the City of Stirling.
“The paving, or sealing, of verges is not permitted except where:
· It involves the installation of on street parking, to the specifications and with the written approval of the City’s Engineering Department;
· The configuration or shape of the verge makes the installation of any other treatment impractical, and paving and/or sealing is to the specification of and with the written approval of the City’s Engineering department; or
· Traffic safety issues make the sealing of the verge and its use for reversing appropriate and paving and/sealing is to the specification of and with the written approval of the City’s Engineering department.
In such instances, a high quality of design and treatment will be required which:
· Provides an attractive appearance, complementing the streetscape;
· Makes provision for, where possible, for the installation of street trees;
· Provides for the disposal of stormwater through soakways provided on-site, unless otherwise agreed with the City’s Engineering Department;
· Makes appropriate provision for pedestrians; and
· Provides paving in a colour contrasting the pavement and road reserve.”
The issues raised in Petition PT06-07/08 that relate to residential properties fully paving the nature strip provide an opportunity to consider changes to the City’s current Local Laws. It is proposed that similar conditions to those currently used within the Cities of Stirling and Rockingham are considered. This would enable the City to grant approval to fully paved nature strip in conjunction with appropriate regulations and guidelines to address water sensitive design, stormwater run off and safety issues.
With regards to the nature strip treatments in Hampshire Drive, Administration is recommending to Council that modifications be negotiated with the property owners to remove treatments which compromise safety and install drainage facilities to accommodate stormwater run off.
Statutory Compliance
The City’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, Part 8 Activities in Thoroughfares, contains the City’s policy in relation to acceptable verge treatments and Part 11 contains the Remedy for breach in relation to the Local Law (See Attachment 2) The City is obligated under the Local Law to remove unauthorised verge treatments and recover expenses incurred.
Strategic Implications
The compliance with the City’s Local Laws relating to thoroughfares is consistent with the following objectives and outcomes of the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“Environmental
1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
The City’s Local Laws provide clear guidelines and policy on current permitted nature strip treatments and contain enforcement procedures for breaches of the laws. Any change to these enforcement procedures would require amendments to the City’s Local Laws to include exemptions or develop policy guidelines to allow property owners to seek case-by-case development type approval from the City to implement nature strip treatments variant to the City’s standard Verge Treatment Guidelines.
Financial Implications
The extent of any financial impact due to the non-compliant nature strip on the City’s expenses is not known. In the absence of additional measures by property owners who install hardstand to the nature strip in excess of that permitted under the current Local Laws, additional maintenance would be necessary to maintain the City’s stormwater drainage infrastructure. In addition, the extent of financial implications to undertake remedial measures in the event of any untoward incident due to non-compliant nature strip could be extensive.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the Director Infrastructure to approve modifications to the existing nature strip treatments adjoining property numbers 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive, Jindalee, in consultation with the property owners, which will address safety and stormwater run off issues;
2. SUPPORTS the Administration’s efforts to ensure the compliance with the City’s Local Laws;
3. NOTES that an amendment to the City’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, Part 8 Activities in Thoroughfares, will be progressed by Administration to allow more flexible nature strip treatments to address water sensitive design, stormwater run off and safety issues; and
4. ADVISE the owners of 46, 52 and 54 Hampshire Drive of Council’s decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 1 of 2
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC PROPERTY LOCAL LAW 1999
PART 8-ACTIVITIES IN THOROUGHFARES
Permissible verge treatments
49. The owner or occupier of land adjacent to a thoroughfare may on the verge in front of such land install any one of the following treatments-
Treatment 1
Plant and maintain lawn; or
Treatment 2
Plant and maintain a garden provided that-
No part of the garden (or plant, or other vegetation making up the garden) exceeds a height of 600mm, or restricts the clear sight visibility of pedestrians or motorists in the vicinity of intersection corners and bends in the thoroughfare;
No plant or other vegetation making up the garden is of a thorny or poisonous nature or which may otherwise create a hazard;
At all times pedestrians must have a 1.5m width safe path or access way established and kept clear of vegetation at all times adjacent the kerb where there is no made footpath; and
No water pipes or connections protrude above the surface of the garden; or
Treatment 3
Install a hard surface with an acceptable material provided that storm water run off generated from the hard surface does not cause a hazard or damage to property; or
Treatment 4
Install a hard surface over a portion of the area of verge (excluding any crossover) with an acceptable material and plant and maintain either a lawn or a garden on the balance in accordance with sub-clause (1) and (2) respectively.
Owner’s or occupiers responsibilities for verge treatments
50. An owner or occupier who installs and maintains a verge treatment shall-
Indemnify the local government against all or any damage or injury caused to any person or thing including any thoroughfare, pavement, footpath or crossover or any pipe or cable and shall make good at such owner’s or occupier’s expense all such damaged caused;
Keep the verge treatment in good and tidy condition and ensure, where the verge treatment is a garden or lawn, that no obstruction of any sort (physical, sight or other) is caused to any access way, footpath, pavement or thoroughfare;
Lay, install or pave a surface with an acceptable material only;
Not place any obstruction on or around any verge treatment;
Not water or maintain a verge treatment in such a manner as to cause a nuisance or hazard to any person using the adjacent footpath, access way or thoroughfare;
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 2
Not extend the verge treatment beyond the verge immediately adjacent to the property owned or occupied, without the written approval of the owner of the adjoining property, immediately adjacent the verge to be treated.
Public works on verges
52. (1) For the purpose of carrying out any works the local government or any authority empowered by law to dig up a thoroughfare or carry out any other works, may without notice and without being liable to compensate any person, dig up all or part of a thoroughfare and disturb any verge treatment placed there by an adjacent owner or occupier.
(2) Where the local government digs up or carries out any works in a verge, which has a verge treatment, then the local government shall use its best endeavours to-
Replace and restore any reticulation pipes and sprinklers; and
Back fill with sand any garden or lawn, but otherwise shall not be liable to replace or restore any verge treatment and in particular any plant, or other vegetation or any surface in any event, shall not be liable to any person for any damage or disturbance caused.
PART 11-REMEDY FOR BREACH
63. (1) Where the local government requires works to be done to rectify a breach of any condition of approval, or to maintain public safety, facilitate public works to the footpath, street, or protect the amenity of a public place, the local government may give notice in writing to the approval holder, or adjacent owner-
Advising details of the breach of the local law or works required;
Requiring the approval holder or adjacent holder or adjacent owner, to remedy the breach or do the works required within the specified in the notice; and
Advising that where the approval holder or adjacent owner fails to comply with the requirements of the notice within the time specified, the local government may do the required work.
(2) Where the approval holder or adjacent owner fails to comply with the requirements of the notice, the local government may by its employees; agents or contractors carry out all works and do all things necessary to comply with the requirements of the notice.
(3) The local government may recover the expenses incurred in carrying out the works in accordance with sub-clause (2)-
As a charge against the secured sum lodged for the purpose in accordance with clause 61; and
From the approval holder or adjacent owner or occupier in a court of competent jurisdiction.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S13/0002V20
File Name: BA Warrant of Payments For the Period to 31 August 2008.doc This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Juanita Lee
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of August, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in August:-
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – August 2008 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
70580 - 70899 784 - 795 |
$1,812,771.98 $8,125,448.52 $9,938,220.50 ($380.07) ($159,064,71) ($9,778,775.72) |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – August 2008 Direct Payments – Advance Recoup Direct Payments – Bank Fees Direct Payments – Credit Cards Direct Payments Total Direct Debits – Payroll TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,778,775.72 $4,070.29 $1,483.30 $9,784,329.31 $2,037,961.30 $11,822,290.61 |
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – August 2008 Cell 5 Cell 6 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$158,516.37 $548.34 $159,064.71 |
At the close of August outstanding creditors amounted to $314,476.62.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The list of accounts paid by cheque and electronic transfer in August 2008 and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of August is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of August, as summarised below:-
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – August 2008 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
70580 - 70899 784 - 795 |
$1,812,771.98 $8,125,448.52 $9,938,220.50 ($380.07) ($159,064,71) ($9,778,775.72) |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – August 2008 Direct Payments – Advance Recoup Direct Payments – Bank Fees Direct Payments – Credit Cards Direct Payments Total Direct Debits – Payroll TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,778,775.72 $4,070.29 $1,483.30 $9,784,329.31 $2,037,961.30 $11,822,290.61 |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – August 2008 Cell 5 Cell 6 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$158,516.37 $548.34 $159,064.71 |
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS AUGUST 2008 |
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
00070580 |
05/08/2008 |
K McWilliam |
$12.50 |
|
|
Refund Of Multi Sport Program - Program Cancelled |
|
00070581 |
05/08/2008 |
A Byers |
$25.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Multi Sport Program - Program Cancelled |
|
00070582 |
05/08/2008 |
Blake O'Halloran |
$50.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund – Sterilisation Rebate |
|
00070583 |
05/08/2008 |
Joanne Buzuk |
$20.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund – Sterilised |
|
00070584 |
05/08/2008 |
Philip McNally |
$20.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund – Sterilised |
|
00070585 |
05/08/2008 |
D M Omodei |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070586 |
05/08/2008 |
Prime Realty |
$200.00 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070587 |
05/08/2008 |
Ghada Colton |
$60.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised Rebate |
|
00070588 |
05/08/2008 |
Allycia Patriarca |
$12.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00070589 |
05/08/2008 |
Watson Property Group Woodvale Rise Ltd |
$20.14 |
|
|
Rates Refund - PN221893 16 Belcastro Way - Overpayment |
|
00070590 |
05/08/2008 |
Office of State Revenue |
$64.02 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN178374 6 Gunsan Mews Mindarie - Pension Rebate |
|
00070591 |
05/08/2008 |
Silver Circus |
$2,650.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070592 |
05/08/2008 |
K Davey |
$92.50 |
|
|
Refund For Swim School Fees |
|
00070593 |
05/08/2008 |
B & SV Karajic |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070594 |
05/08/2008 |
K Rees |
$185.00 |
|
|
Refund For Swim School Fees |
|
00070595 |
05/08/2008 |
SJ & Y Gray |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070596 |
05/08/2008 |
Peter Moyes Anglican Community |
$565.00 |
|
|
Facility Hire Refund |
|
00070597 |
05/08/2008 |
Gymnastics Western Australia |
$600.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship Request For R Bakewell, O Booth & C Booth To Attend Australian Trampoline Champs In Vic 01-04/07/08 |
|
00070598 |
05/08/2008 |
Woodvale Little Athletics Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship Request For C Pearming To Attend International Athletics Champs In Singapore 28/06-05/07/08 |
|
00070599 |
05/08/2008 |
Vital Gymnastics |
$600.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship Request For Naylor, B Naylor & K Brewer To Attend National Championships On 16/07/08 |
|
00070600 |
05/08/2008 |
KM Wakeling |
$140.00 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN220724 37 Carbine Loop - Payment Made In Error |
|
00070601 |
05/08/2008 |
Carey Jan Anderson |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070602 |
05/08/2008 |
Miten Shah |
$340.00 |
|
|
Facility Hire Refund |
|
00070603 |
05/08/2008 |
Office of State Revenue |
$828.89 |
|
|
Rates Refund - PN141475 6 Schooner Place Yanchep - Pension Rebate |
|
00070604 |
05/08/2008 |
Acclaimed Catering |
$2,665.85 |
|
|
Catering For Council Dinner 29/07/08 - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Catering For Adopt The Budget 25/07/08 - Hospitality |
|
00070605 |
05/08/2008 |
Alpha First Aid Supplies Pty Ltd |
$4,884.90 |
|
|
First Aid Equipment - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00070606 |
05/08/2008 |
Calidad Industries |
$163.41 |
|
|
Opal Acrylic Dome - Building Maintenance |
|
00070607 |
05/08/2008 |
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,742.00 |
|
|
Equipment For IT |
|
00070608 |
05/08/2008 |
Eric McCrumb |
$44.00 |
|
|
Wildlife Presentation To Alexander Heights Mainstream Program |
|
00070609 |
05/08/2008 |
FOO HUA Chinese Restaurant |
$83.00 |
|
|
Catering For Volunteer Meeting - Re Summer Safe Program - Fire Services |
|
00070610 |
05/08/2008 |
Heathridge IGA |
$98.85 |
|
|
Groceries For Buckingham House |
|
00070611 |
05/08/2008 |
Hughan Saw Service |
$62.70 |
|
|
Blade Sharpening - Building Maintenance |
|
00070612 |
05/08/2008 |
Landmark |
$23.88 |
|
|
Sout Barbed Staples - Parks |
|
00070613 |
05/08/2008 |
Mindarie Regional Council |
$3,658.84 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
00070614 |
05/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070615 |
05/08/2008 |
North River Caravans |
$265.57 |
|
|
Supply/Fit Awning - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070616 |
05/08/2008 |
Perth Magistrates Court |
$264.00 |
|
|
Sitting Fees - City Of Wanneroo VS Kennedy - Finance |
|
00070617 |
05/08/2008 |
Shire of Chittering |
$7,035.90 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Long Service Leave For M Humfrey - HR |
|
00070618 |
05/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo |
$17,464.22 |
|
|
Subdivision Bond Incorrectly Receipted By Customer Relations |
|
00070619 |
05/08/2008 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070620 |
05/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$214.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070621 |
05/08/2008 |
Alinta Gas |
$353.05 |
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00070622 |
05/08/2008 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$205.55 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070623 |
05/08/2008 |
Landgate |
$2,008.60 |
|
|
Land Searches - Contracts & Property |
|
00070624 |
05/08/2008 |
Mr E Martin |
$217.70 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment Aug 08 |
|
00070625 |
05/08/2008 |
Optus |
$50.15 |
|
|
Optus Gas Flare - Waste Services |
|
00070626 |
05/08/2008 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$362.95 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070627 |
05/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$62.60 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070628 |
05/08/2008 |
Landgate |
$3,426.81 |
|
|
Valuations For Rating Services |
|
00070629 |
05/08/2008 |
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash |
$93.50 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070630 |
05/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070631 |
05/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070632 |
05/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070633 |
05/08/2008 |
Synergy |
$230,606.90 |
|
|
2 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
Street Lighting 24/06/08-24/07/08 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For They City |
|
00070634 |
05/08/2008 |
Telstra |
$135.72 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
Bigpond ADSL 26.07.08-25.08.08 – IT Services |
|
00070635 |
05/08/2008 |
Mrs J Martin |
$191.58 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer Payments For Aug08 |
|
00070636 |
05/08/2008 |
Ms D Hetherington |
$182.87 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer Payments For Aug08 |
|
00070637 |
05/08/2008 |
Councillor Colin Hughes |
$340.86 |
|
|
Travel Allowance Dec07-Jun08 |
|
00070638 |
05/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$272.00 |
|
|
Sundry Debtor Paid To Rates In Error By Ratepayer |
|
00070639 |
05/08/2008 |
Mr J A Baker |
$43.54 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
00070640 |
05/08/2008 |
Dept For Planning And Infrastructure |
$570.90 |
|
|
Search For Vehicle Ownership - Rangers |
|
00070641 |
05/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$99.85 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070642 |
05/08/2008 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$105.20 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070643 |
05/08/2008 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$301.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070644 |
05/08/2008 |
Mrs K A Haunold |
$95.79 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment For Aug08 |
|
00070645 |
05/08/2008 |
Frank Hamilton |
$87.08 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
00070646 |
05/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Yanchep Bus Trust Account |
$8,588.64 |
|
|
Bus Hire Charges 08/05-06/08 |
|
00070647 |
06/08/2008 |
R I Hodgkinson |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070648 |
06/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$39.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070649 |
06/08/2008 |
Rangers & Safety Services Petty Cash |
$207.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070650 |
12/08/2008 |
North Coast Rugby Union Football Club |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070651 |
12/08/2008 |
Kristy Baxter |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070652 |
12/08/2008 |
Bhupendra Chauhan |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070653 |
12/08/2008 |
DR Poolman |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070654 |
12/08/2008 |
Karen Armstrong |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070655 |
12/08/2008 |
Milagros Congrene |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070656 |
12/08/2008 |
A Mason |
$197.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070657 |
12/08/2008 |
Lisa Seun |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070658 |
12/08/2008 |
Julie Stephen |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070659 |
12/08/2008 |
Brigitte Tha-Heh |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070660 |
12/08/2008 |
Maxine Newby |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070661 |
12/08/2008 |
Islamic Education & Social Assoc |
$194.10 |
|
|
Facility Hire Refund |
|
00070662 |
12/08/2008 |
The MQ1 Land Syndicate |
$165,648.90 |
|
|
Refund Of Infrastructure Contribution From Lot 12 (2359) Marmion Avenue, Jindalee From Clarkson - Butler Scheme Account |
|
00070663 |
12/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Sporting Clays |
$603.90 |
|
|
Donation Towards Wanneroo Sporting Clays Materials For Shade Structure |
|
00070664 |
12/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070665 |
12/08/2008 |
Hasryn Hajah-Mydin |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070666 |
12/08/2008 |
Mark Anthony Carey |
$150.00 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070667 |
12/08/2008 |
Paul Whitehead |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070668 |
12/08/2008 |
Brad Mellows |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070669 |
12/08/2008 |
Millside Investments Pty Ltd |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070670 |
12/08/2008 |
Quinns Rocks Primary School |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070671 |
12/08/2008 |
Jackie Maiolo |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070672 |
12/08/2008 |
Butler Playgroup |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070673 |
12/08/2008 |
PJ & JA MELLOWS |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070674 |
12/08/2008 |
BG & MN STURGESS |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070675 |
12/08/2008 |
DANNY HLAING |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070676 |
12/08/2008 |
SJ & KM TOTTMAN |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070677 |
12/08/2008 |
Laden Hassan |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070678 |
12/08/2008 |
Butler Playgroup |
$16.68 |
|
|
Facility Hire Refund |
|
00070679 |
12/08/2008 |
Bev Manning |
$240.00 |
|
|
Yanchep Community Centre Exercise Program - Community Links |
|
00070680 |
12/08/2008 |
City of Subiaco |
$5,809.49 |
|
|
Long Service Leave Payment For A Millard - HR |
|
00070681 |
12/08/2008 |
Collector of Public Money |
$1,068.25 |
|
|
CCB Debt From 07 Period 1 As A Result Of Over Advance & Closure Of Service |
|
00070682 |
12/08/2008 |
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,186.24 |
|
|
Equipment – IT Services |
|
00070683 |
12/08/2008 |
Department of Sport & Recreation |
$210.00 |
|
|
Ern Halliday Crate Climb - Youth Services |
|
00070684 |
12/08/2008 |
Drive Train |
$25.90 |
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores |
|
00070685 |
12/08/2008 |
Far East Express |
$150.00 |
|
|
Catering - Hainsworth Community Centre |
|
00070686 |
12/08/2008 |
JB Precise Engineering |
$1,069.20 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070687 |
12/08/2008 |
KFC - Head Office |
$66.50 |
|
|
Catering - Wanneroo Maintenance Day - Fire Services |
|
00070688 |
12/08/2008 |
Kott Gunning Lawyers |
$1,400.30 |
|
|
Professional Fees - Law Research & Advice - HR |
|
|
|
Professional Fees - AMW Preparation - HR |
|
00070689 |
12/08/2008 |
MM Electrical Merchandising |
$649.00 |
|
|
Supply Electrical Conduits For Scenic Drive Wanneroo - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00070690 |
12/08/2008 |
Non Organic Disposals |
$4,080.00 |
|
|
Removal Of Rubbish - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00070691 |
12/08/2008 |
Relationships Australia |
$418.00 |
|
|
Employee Presentation - Conflict In Relationships - 23/07/08 - HR |
|
00070692 |
12/08/2008 |
State Library of WA |
$77.00 |
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges |
|
00070693 |
12/08/2008 |
Wanneroo IGA |
$1,358.89 |
|
|
Groceries For Hospitality July 2008 |
|
00070694 |
12/08/2008 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070695 |
12/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$259.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070696 |
12/08/2008 |
Alinta Gas |
$1,243.75 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00070697 |
12/08/2008 |
Building & Construction Industry |
$98,238.64 |
|
|
Building & Construction Levy Collections 01/07-31/07/08 |
|
00070698 |
12/08/2008 |
Landgate |
$730.40 |
|
|
Extraction Of Cadastral Data For Annual Access Licence Service Fee - Contracts & Property |
|
00070699 |
12/08/2008 |
Michael Hayes |
$40.00 |
|
|
Keyholder - Cockman House For Aug08 |
|
00070700 |
12/08/2008 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$327.85 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070701 |
12/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$95.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070702 |
12/08/2008 |
Water Corporation |
$11,034.01 |
|
|
Requested Works At Quinns Road Quinns Rocks |
|
|
|
Requested Works At Ocean Drive Quinns Rocks |
|
|
|
Road/Footpath Reinstatement Due To Hydrant Works At FESA House |
|
|
|
Metered Fire Hydrant Standpipe Hires |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070703 |
12/08/2008 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Library Petty Cash |
$49.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070704 |
12/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,360.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
00070705 |
12/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070706 |
12/08/2008 |
Synergy |
$10,580.35 |
|
|
Power Supplies For They City |
|
|
|
3 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070707 |
12/08/2008 |
Telstra |
$424.44 |
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
Mobile Broadband For Fire Services |
|
00070708 |
12/08/2008 |
Pat Dumaresq |
$110.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Podiatry Clinics |
|
00070709 |
12/08/2008 |
Ms L Stevens |
$75.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Day Care Centres |
|
00070710 |
12/08/2008 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$254.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070711 |
12/08/2008 |
Angela Genovese |
$60.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Buses |
|
00070712 |
12/08/2008 |
Andy Heerkins |
$220.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Buses |
|
00070713 |
12/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$174.10 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070714 |
12/08/2008 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$165.60 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070715 |
12/08/2008 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$176.35 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070716 |
12/08/2008 |
Bruce Thompson |
$200.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Buses |
|
00070717 |
12/08/2008 |
Zurich Client Service |
$235.38 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
00070718 |
13/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070719 |
13/08/2008 |
Jeremy Tidy |
$750.00 |
|
|
Support For Beijing Paralympic Games In September |
|
00070720 |
18/08/2008 |
Councillor F Cvitan |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
00070721 |
18/08/2008 |
Councillor Dorothy Newton |
$500.00 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance $83.33 Paid To Rates PN136156 |
|
00070722 |
18/08/2008 |
Councillor Colin Hughes |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
00070723 |
18/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$283.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid To Rates PN136156 - For Cr D Newton ($83.33) & PN150893 For Mayor Kelly ($200.00) |
|
00070724 |
19/08/2008 |
Karen Hinkley |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070725 |
19/08/2008 |
Gumala Aboriginal Corporation |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070726 |
19/08/2008 |
JP EARL |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070727 |
19/08/2008 |
A Munro |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070728 |
19/08/2008 |
Stirling Basketball Association |
$203.20 |
|
|
Refund Of Facility Hire |
|
00070729 |
19/08/2008 |
Settlement Group |
$90.10 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN165555 53B Addington Way, Marangaroo - Overpayment |
|
00070730 |
19/08/2008 |
R Fordham |
$565.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Facility Hire |
|
00070731 |
19/08/2008 |
R Goldstein |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070732 |
19/08/2008 |
G Caird |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070733 |
19/08/2008 |
J Kowalski |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher - Economic Development |
|
00070734 |
19/08/2008 |
M Nash |
$204.50 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070735 |
19/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070736 |
19/08/2008 |
G Potter |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070737 |
19/08/2008 |
GOLDLEAF HOLDINGS PTY LTD |
$253.26 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN221019 42 Prestige Parade, Wangara - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070738 |
19/08/2008 |
Goldleaf Holdings Pty Ltd |
$315.26 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN221020 48 Prestige Parade, Wangara - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070739 |
19/08/2008 |
Peet Ashton Heights Limited |
$700.61 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN222559 108 Waldburg Drive, Tapping - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070740 |
19/08/2008 |
Lonnegal Properties P/L & Cedar Woods Properties Ltd |
$979.56 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN222560 2 Yandella Promenade, Tapping - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070741 |
19/08/2008 |
LONNEGAL Properties P/L |
$227.05 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN163333 100 Clarkson Avenue, Tapping - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070742 |
19/08/2008 |
Butler Land Company P/L & Quinns Developments P/L |
$681.15 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN222721 20 Costelloe Gardens, Butler - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070743 |
19/08/2008 |
Justin Sonia P/L |
$130.78 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN219195 5 Traminer Way, Pearsall - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070744 |
19/08/2008 |
Justin Sonia P/L |
$130.78 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN219208 2 Traminer Way, Pearsall - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070745 |
19/08/2008 |
Patanal Pty Ltd |
$329.76 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN211174 1 Dalecross Avenue, Madeley - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070746 |
19/08/2008 |
Quinns Developments P/L & Butler Land Company P/L |
$1,962.09 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN217380 960 Connolly Drive, Ridgewood - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070747 |
19/08/2008 |
Helen O'Gradys Children's Drama Academy |
$50.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00070748 |
19/08/2008 |
Nesha Ontong |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070749 |
19/08/2008 |
Adrian Collins |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070750 |
19/08/2008 |
Michelle Taylor |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070751 |
19/08/2008 |
Leeanne Batson |
$15.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Overpayment |
|
00070752 |
19/08/2008 |
Vicki Joyce |
$20.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00070753 |
19/08/2008 |
Joanna Wise |
$55.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00070754 |
19/08/2008 |
AJ & ML Walker |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070755 |
19/08/2008 |
Jay Parmar |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070756 |
19/08/2008 |
Maree Munrowd |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070757 |
19/08/2008 |
Harley Hayward |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070758 |
19/08/2008 |
C E Moore |
$275.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070759 |
19/08/2008 |
S N Fairhurst |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070760 |
19/08/2008 |
Anita Xavier Fernandes |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070761 |
19/08/2008 |
GL & SA Dodd |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070762 |
19/08/2008 |
Northside Timber Flooring |
$79.00 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN186923 3/10 Achievement Way - Rate Overpayment |
|
00070763 |
19/08/2008 |
P J & J A Mellows |
$573.49 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN214079 7 Melita Rise - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070764 |
19/08/2008 |
Australand Holdings Ltd |
$290.19 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN211028 33 Ladera Drive - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070765 |
19/08/2008 |
R & D Tierney |
$278.23 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN213122 38 Sacramento Parade - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070766 |
19/08/2008 |
Watson Property Group Complete Homes Pty Ltd |
$820.95 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN216957 46 Cvintan Bend - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070767 |
19/08/2008 |
Mindarie Keys Joint Venture |
$389.23 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN220628 90 Alexandria View Mindarie - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070768 |
19/08/2008 |
Matthew James Maxwell Telling |
$429.56 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN213429 12 Trinity Way - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070769 |
19/08/2008 |
A & A Wisniewski |
$475.26 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN216419 37 Celebration Boulevard - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070770 |
19/08/2008 |
Homeswest Vacant |
$84.98 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN222443 14 Rocklands Loop - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070771 |
19/08/2008 |
Perron Developments Pty Ltd |
$705.51 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN219151 156 Gnangara Rd - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070772 |
19/08/2008 |
Yanchep Sun City Pty Ltd & Capricorn Investment Group Pty Ltd |
$2,153.73 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN221551 599 Two Rocks Road - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070773 |
19/08/2008 |
Century 21 Gold Key Realty |
$270.00 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070774 |
19/08/2008 |
Lino Visintin |
$15.41 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN218322 15 Torrenova Way - Subdivision Refund |
|
00070775 |
19/08/2008 |
ALC Training Pty Ltd |
$629.20 |
|
|
GST Was Not Paid On Paid Invoice 48533 For ITIL Essentials Course & Exam For M Grigsby, A Angus G Duran & N Friedli – IT Services |
|
00070776 |
19/08/2008 |
Balcatta Mowers |
$72.00 |
|
|
Filing Kit For Conservation |
|
00070777 |
19/08/2008 |
Charles Aldous-Ball (Aboricultural Consultant) |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
Arboricultural Survey For Wanneroo Town Centre - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00070778 |
19/08/2008 |
City of Swan |
$56,525.09 |
|
|
June 2008 Quarter Wangara Revenue Entitlement - Waste Services |
|
00070779 |
19/08/2008 |
Diva Flowers |
$135.00 |
|
|
Flowers For Office Of The Mayor |
|
00070780 |
19/08/2008 |
Edgewater Veterinary Hospital |
$470.90 |
|
|
Veterinary Costs - Euthanasia 13 Dogs, Consultation & Pharmaceuticals/Procedures |
|
00070781 |
19/08/2008 |
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$270,939.20 |
|
|
Progress Claim 5 Innovative Playspace Area 30/07/08 - Projects |
|
00070782 |
19/08/2008 |
FOO HUA Chinese Restaurant |
$363.50 |
|
|
Catering - Hazard Reduction Burning - Fire Services |
|
00070783 |
19/08/2008 |
Kingsway Football & Sporting Club Inc |
$2,040.96 |
|
|
Reimburse 60% Electricity For Kingsway Football & Sporting Club - Contracts & Property |
|
00070784 |
19/08/2008 |
Mindarie Regional Council |
$418,210.51 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
00070785 |
19/08/2008 |
Recreation & Sport Network Inc |
$495.00 |
|
|
Training Sessions Sports Connect Education - Community Services |
|
00070786 |
19/08/2008 |
Scatena & Associates |
$23,980.00 |
|
|
Additions To Warradale Community Centre - Projects |
|
00070787 |
19/08/2008 |
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$754.50 |
|
|
Sand Deliveries For Parks |
|
00070788 |
19/08/2008 |
Sensis Pty Ltd |
$767.80 |
|
|
Yellow Pages Advert 2009 - Contracts & Property |
|
00070789 |
19/08/2008 |
State Library of WA |
$279.40 |
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges - Library Services |
|
00070790 |
19/08/2008 |
WA Limestone Company |
$23,925.84 |
|
|
Limestone/Bitumen Mix Deliveries For Engineering Maintenance |
|
00070791 |
19/08/2008 |
Wangara Trailers, Outdoor & Boating |
$478.50 |
|
|
Repair Tow Hitch - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070792 |
19/08/2008 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070793 |
19/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$187.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070794 |
19/08/2008 |
Alinta Gas |
$200.00 |
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070795 |
19/08/2008 |
Amp Flexible Lifetime Super Fund |
$1,068.46 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070796 |
19/08/2008 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$95.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070797 |
19/08/2008 |
Hainsworth Community Centre Petty Cash |
$180.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070798 |
19/08/2008 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$379.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070799 |
19/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$80.30 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070800 |
19/08/2008 |
Landgate |
$5,840.54 |
|
|
Valuations - Rating Services |
|
00070801 |
19/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$120.50 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070802 |
19/08/2008 |
Water Corporation |
$3,274.25 |
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070803 |
19/08/2008 |
Cancelled |
|
00070804 |
19/08/2008 |
Synergy |
$4,911.50 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
2 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070805 |
19/08/2008 |
Telstra |
$48,770.10 |
|
|
Bigpond ADSL - 05/07-04/08/08 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070806 |
19/08/2008 |
Mr J A Baker |
$21.77 |
|
|
Key Holder Banksia Grove |
|
00070807 |
19/08/2008 |
Dept For Planning And Infrastructure |
$31.00 |
|
|
Annual Jetty Licence From 01/08/08 - Engineering |
|
00070808 |
19/08/2008 |
Navigator Applications Account |
$112.44 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070809 |
19/08/2008 |
HOSTPLUS Superannuation Fund |
$434.81 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070810 |
19/08/2008 |
WESTSCHEME |
$1,594.29 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070811 |
19/08/2008 |
MLC Nominees Pty Limited |
$296.14 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070812 |
19/08/2008 |
The Industry Superannuation Fund |
$347.48 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070813 |
19/08/2008 |
1OOF Portfolio Service Superannuation Fund |
$136.10 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070814 |
19/08/2008 |
Hainsworth Programme Development Petty Cash |
$299.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070815 |
19/08/2008 |
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund |
$71.96 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070816 |
19/08/2008 |
MTAA Superannuation Fund |
$283.74 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070817 |
19/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$84.10 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070818 |
19/08/2008 |
AustralianSuper |
$1,142.10 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070819 |
19/08/2008 |
Western Power |
$2,457.05 |
|
|
Repair Underground Damage To Various Locations - Waste Services |
|
00070820 |
19/08/2008 |
REST Superannuation |
$777.39 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070821 |
19/08/2008 |
Asgard Elements Super |
$126.12 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070822 |
19/08/2008 |
Printing Industry Superannuation Fund |
$335.30 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070823 |
19/08/2008 |
Health Super Fund |
$174.11 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070824 |
19/08/2008 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$200.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070825 |
19/08/2008 |
Hesta Super Fund |
$925.37 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070826 |
19/08/2008 |
Colonial First State FirstChoice |
$273.28 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
00070827 |
19/08/2008 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$231.35 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070828 |
21/08/2008 |
Australia Post |
$15,869.65 |
|
|
Postage Charges - July 2008 |
|
00070829 |
26/08/2008 |
Rachel King |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070830 |
26/08/2008 |
Nimish Solanki |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070831 |
26/08/2008 |
Tricia Gomm |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070832 |
26/08/2008 |
Laura Simatovic |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070833 |
26/08/2008 |
Mira Riad |
$340.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070834 |
26/08/2008 |
Shane Larmont |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070835 |
26/08/2008 |
Barbara Humphreys |
$340.00 |
|
|
Facility Hire Refund |
|
00070836 |
26/08/2008 |
L R & M M Simpson |
$387.24 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN181759 53 Viridian Drive - Overpayment |
|
00070837 |
26/08/2008 |
R B & A J Bennett |
$257.60 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN190553 60 Kingsway - Overpayment |
|
00070838 |
26/08/2008 |
Ghebresus Tfgay |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070839 |
26/08/2008 |
B & K Pinder |
$2,875.03 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN200117 29 Middleton Road - Overpayment |
|
00070840 |
26/08/2008 |
Clydella Ann Isaacs |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070841 |
26/08/2008 |
S & D R Houghton |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00070842 |
26/08/2008 |
Kim Bennetts |
$60.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised & Sterilisation Rebate |
|
00070843 |
26/08/2008 |
Robert Sotherland |
$6.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
00070844 |
26/08/2008 |
Veronica Hall |
$55.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilisation Rebate |
|
00070845 |
26/08/2008 |
Charles Rawlins Tae Kwon Do Academy |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070846 |
26/08/2008 |
Shakira Berryman |
$20.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00070847 |
26/08/2008 |
Kiran Patel |
$565.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00070848 |
26/08/2008 |
Gary Fife |
$220.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00070849 |
26/08/2008 |
A D Bianco |
$936.68 |
|
|
Rates Refund PN195147 9 Stetson Court - Overpayment |
|
00070850 |
26/08/2008 |
Gary Nielsen |
$25.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
00070851 |
26/08/2008 |
Joan Scrivewer |
$28.50 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00070852 |
26/08/2008 |
Sandi Crichton |
$60.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilisation Rebate |
|
00070853 |
26/08/2008 |
Ryan Scholz |
$70.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilisation Rebate |
|
00070854 |
26/08/2008 |
Louise Anderson |
$10.00 |
|
|
Dog Refund - Half Price Registration |
|
00070855 |
26/08/2008 |
A & P Clarke Brickpaving & Limestone |
$8,613.00 |
|
|
Limestone Works & Paving At Various Parks |
|
00070856 |
26/08/2008 |
Acclaimed Catering |
$1,098.90 |
|
|
Catering For Council Dinner 12/08/08 - Hospitality |
|
00070857 |
26/08/2008 |
Arborwest Tree Farm |
$660.00 |
|
|
Kings Park Special - Parks |
|
00070858 |
26/08/2008 |
ATT Radiators |
$120.00 |
|
|
Modify Truck Heater Tank - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070859 |
26/08/2008 |
Camera Repairs Morley |
$88.00 |
|
|
Camera Repairs - IT Services |
|
00070860 |
26/08/2008 |
Chris O'Neill & Assoc |
$19,057.50 |
|
|
Consultancy Fee For St Andrews District Structure Plan - Smart Growth |
|
|
|
Consultancy Fee For Alkimos-Eglinton District Structure Plan - Smart Growth |
|
00070861 |
26/08/2008 |
City of Rockingham |
$22.40 |
|
|
Lost & Damaged Stock For Mobile Library |
|
00070862 |
26/08/2008 |
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,868.13 |
|
|
Kits For Dell Monitor - IT Services |
|
00070863 |
26/08/2008 |
Drive Train |
$90.66 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070864 |
26/08/2008 |
ECO Pressure Cleaning |
$411.40 |
|
|
Pressure Cleaning To Remove Skid Marks - Engineering Maintenance |
|
00070865 |
26/08/2008 |
Harris Engines |
$250.00 |
|
|
Conrods - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070866 |
26/08/2008 |
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$304.93 |
|
|
Hydraulic Puller - Fleet Maintenance |
|
00070867 |
26/08/2008 |
Kidogo Art School |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
Kids Art Holiday Workshop July - Cultural Service |
|
00070868 |
26/08/2008 |
Kingsway Football & Sporting Club Inc |
$733.68 |
|
|
Reimburse 60% Electricity For Kingsway Football & Sporting Club - Contracts & Property |
|
00070869 |
26/08/2008 |
Kmart Joondalup |
$400.00 |
|
|
Gift Vouchers As Prizes For Your View Competition |
|
00070870 |
26/08/2008 |
Mindarie Regional Council |
$5,480.74 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
00070871 |
26/08/2008 |
Northern Suburbs Bailiff |
$151.00 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Rating Services |
|
00070872 |
26/08/2008 |
Shire of Kalamunda |
$4.40 |
|
|
Lost Book Charges - Library Services |
|
00070873 |
26/08/2008 |
State Library of WA |
$48.90 |
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges - Library Services |
|
00070874 |
26/08/2008 |
Trevors Carpets |
$675.00 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Carpet At Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
00070875 |
26/08/2008 |
WA Limestone Company |
$1,718.02 |
|
|
Supply Bitumen Mix/Limestone - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00070876 |
26/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo |
$90.98 |
|
|
ECITF & BRB Levies For Building Licence Application For Quinns Volunteer Fire Shed Fire Engine Bays (BCITF Levy $51.98 BRB Levy $39.00) |
|
00070877 |
26/08/2008 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070878 |
26/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$349.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070879 |
26/08/2008 |
Building & Construction Industry |
$22,620.94 |
|
|
Building & Construction Levy Collections 01/08-15/08/08 |
|
00070880 |
26/08/2008 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$190.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070881 |
26/08/2008 |
Landgate |
$1,660.50 |
|
|
Title Searches - Rates & Contracts Property |
|
00070882 |
26/08/2008 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$170.35 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070883 |
26/08/2008 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$276.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070884 |
26/08/2008 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$78.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070885 |
26/08/2008 |
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash |
$77.05 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070886 |
26/08/2008 |
Zurich Client Service |
$235.38 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
00070887 |
26/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,608.00 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
00070888 |
26/08/2008 |
Synergy |
$7,844.20 |
|
|
2 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For They City |
|
00070889 |
26/08/2008 |
Telstra |
$11,060.98 |
|
|
Phone Charges – IT Services |
|
|
|
1 x Ratepayer Financial Assistance |
|
00070890 |
26/08/2008 |
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Motor Vehicle Claim For 2 Council Vehicles |
|
00070891 |
26/08/2008 |
Ms C Maloney |
$50.70 |
|
|
Refund Of Park Hire |
|
00070892 |
26/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$271.86 |
|
|
Travel Allowance For July 08 Paid To Cr Steffens Rates PN126238 |
|
00070893 |
26/08/2008 |
Mr M J Donnelly |
$105.10 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Business Breakfast For Ecovision Meeting At Subiaco Hotel |
|
00070894 |
26/08/2008 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$105.05 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070895 |
26/08/2008 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$73.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070896 |
26/08/2008 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$134.85 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00070897 |
26/08/2008 |
City of Wanneroo - Yanchep Bus Trust |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Funds To Be Transferred To Bendigo Bank |
|
00070898 |
26/08/2008 |
Mrs J F Keelan-Wake |
$174.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Purchase Of Safety Boots Required For Employment At Recycling Facility |
|
00070899 |
28/08/2008 |
ACP Settlements |
$173,764.82 |
|
|
Purchase Of 471 Gnangara Road, Gnangara & Settlement Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$1,812,771.98 |
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER LISTING |
|||
00000784 |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving |
$21,089.88 |
|
|
Install Paving At Ocean Drive Quinns Rocks Parks |
|
|
|
AHG Paper & Magazine Delivery |
$16.40 |
|
|
Newspapers - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Ambit Industries Pty Ltd |
$16,863.00 |
|
|
Extend Height Of Existing Interal Cages At Alexander Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Fence Repairs - Parks |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Of Fencing - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$892.36 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$554.08 |
|
|
Cash Collection - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Arup |
$6,022.50 |
|
|
Engineering Services At Hartman Drive |
|
|
|
Aust Inst Of Building Surveyors |
$55.00 |
|
|
Subscription - The Australian Building Surveyor Magazine - July 2008 To June 2009 - Building Services |
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$8,782.13 |
|
|
Airconditioning Services For The City |
|
|
|
Australian Government National Measurement Institute |
$784.19 |
|
|
Analysis Fees - Conservation Maintenance |
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$1,155.00 |
|
|
Training - Word Introduction 24/07/08 - HR |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers |
$387.75 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware |
$147.14 |
|
|
Parts - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$12,900.40 |
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$1,108.14 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd |
$858.00 |
|
|
Consulting Fees For Butler Community Centre |
|
|
|
BGC Blokpave |
$33.01 |
|
|
Vistapave - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
BGC Concrete |
$181.06 |
|
|
Concrete For Ocean Keys Bvld Clarkson |
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$9,328.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$1,394.62 |
|
|
Various Items - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Various Items - Alexander Heights Day Care |
|
|
|
Various Items - Waste Services |
|
|
|
Bynorm |
$20.31 |
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd |
$324.82 |
|
|
Food/Beverages - Hospitality |
|
|
|
CD Autos Electrics Pty Ltd |
$1,003.75 |
|
|
Parts Fitting - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Fork Lift Maintenance - Fire Services |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$353.00 |
|
|
Mobile Phone – IT Services |
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$162.57 |
|
|
Soft Drinks - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Coffee Advisory Service |
$175.00 |
|
|
Coffee For Elected Members - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Commarine |
$550.00 |
|
|
Parts – Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$140.00 |
|
|
Volunteer National Police Check June 2008 |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$57.89 |
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Direct Door Service |
$363.00 |
|
|
Door Repairs - Ashby Depot |
|
|
|
DME Contractors |
$23,030.15 |
|
|
Claim 5 Landscaping Work For Kingsbridge Skate Park |
|
|
|
Dorma Movable Walls Pty Ltd |
$8,305.00 |
|
|
Supply/Install Panels For Operable Walls For Hainsworth Leisure Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$7,552.99 |
|
|
Supply/Install Concrete Footpath At Ocean Reef Road |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$6,248.07 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services Pty Ltd |
$261.80 |
|
|
Fire Equipment Services For The City |
|
|
|
Fence Hire WA |
$508.20 |
|
|
Fence Hire For Mary Lindsay Homestead |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$493.50 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
GC Sales (WA) |
$389,840.00 |
|
|
Recycling Bins - Waste Services |
|
|
|
Geldens Pty Ltd |
$219.56 |
|
|
Assorted Brigade Epaulettes - Fire Services |
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$3,190.00 |
|
|
Street Lighting Design For Hepburn Avenue - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
GM & J Lombardi Pty Ltd |
$1,250.96 |
|
|
Landcruiser Parts - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu |
$1,206.25 |
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Gymbus Pty Ltd |
$1,188.00 |
|
|
Edgym Event 17/07/08 At Gumblossom Reserve - Leisure |
|
|
|
Edgym Event 09/07/08 At Kingsway Recreation Centre |
|
|
|
Halsmith Consulting |
$4,650.80 |
|
|
Professional Services: Mediation Between Neighbours 20/03-31/07/08 |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$748.88 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$1,692.06 |
|
|
Health Technical Officer - Health Services |
|
|
|
HIA Ltd |
$585.20 |
|
|
Course - Residential Planning Codes – Attendee C Davidson |
|
|
|
Training Course - Building Code Of Aust Application Workshop 24/07/08 – Attendee M Blaquiere |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$304.14 |
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Hospitality Total Services |
$1,848.00 |
|
|
Consultancy - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Humes |
$4,305.33 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Ibolt Pty Ltd |
$742.50 |
|
|
Repairs To Fence & Gate At Banksia Grove Community Centre - Parks |
|
|
|
Ice and Oven Technologies Pty Ltd |
$308.00 |
|
|
Ice Machine Service - New Civic Centre |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable |
$20,816.68 |
|
|
Casual Labour Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Intercity Office Partitioning |
$1,375.00 |
|
|
Repairs To Roof Leak At Civic Centre Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Jason Sign Makers |
$546.15 |
|
|
Signage - Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Signage - Quinns Rocks - Fire Service |
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services |
$900.00 |
|
|
Course - Basic Traffic Management 24/07/08 - Parks |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$6,567.61 |
|
|
Mono Digital Multifunction Copier - Rangers |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Various Items – IT Services |
|
|
|
Latitude Creative Services |
$125.95 |
|
|
Copies Of Wanneroo Living History DVD – Leisure Servicese |
|
|
|
Louie's Flyscreens Allsafe |
$260.00 |
|
|
Supply One-Way Vision Sheets - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$20,214.98 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors |
$4,381.35 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Services |
|
|
|
Metrocount |
$666.60 |
|
|
Various Items - Infrastructure Planning |
|
|
|
Mobile Glass |
$2,434.04 |
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre |
$95.20 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Move It |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Relocate Items - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors |
$12,809.78 |
|
|
Landscaping - Various Locations |
|
|
|
North Lake Electrical Pty Ltd |
$751.80 |
|
|
Irrigation Repairs - Winston Park |
|
|
|
Nuturf Australia Pty Ltd |
$821.70 |
|
|
Lawn Seed For Parks |
|
|
|
Optima Press |
$6,891.50 |
|
|
Printing - MRF Docket Books – Waste Services |
|
|
|
Printing - Service Agreement Books – Waste Services |
|
|
|
Printing - A4 Base Stock - Kingsway |
|
|
|
Printing - Bookmarks - Libraries |
|
|
|
Printing - Tip Passes – Waste Services |
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries |
$842.16 |
|
|
Recycling Bin Exchange Services - Information Management |
|
|
|
Parchem Construction Supplies Pty Ltd |
$883.93 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Grinding Cage - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Personalised Landscape & Design |
$385.00 |
|
|
Repairs To Gazebo - Parks |
|
|
|
PGS Industries |
$429.00 |
|
|
Parts For Parks |
|
|
|
Pink Healthcare Services |
$356.95 |
|
|
Sanitary Service - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$62.60 |
|
|
Memory Card - IT |
|
|
|
Pocket Phone |
$114.75 |
|
|
5 x Mobile Car Chargers – IT Services |
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$542.85 |
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$693.00 |
|
|
Core Samples For Tyson Place - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Pavement Investigation At Wesco Rd Nowergup |
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi |
$48.00 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Safety World |
$121.66 |
|
|
Safety Boots For Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Safetyquip |
$594.00 |
|
|
Trolley For Information Management |
|
|
|
Sanax St Andrews Pharmacy |
$69.61 |
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Health Services |
|
|
|
Schiavello Wa Pty Ltd |
$976.80 |
|
|
Office Furniture - Shelves/Trays/Walls |
|
|
|
Skipper Trucks Belmont |
$815.15 |
|
|
Vehicle Services For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$212.32 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors |
$4,042.50 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$4,673.00 |
|
|
Various Works At John Maloney Clubroom - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company |
$861.39 |
|
|
Various Signs For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Sussex Industries |
$1,100.17 |
|
|
Pink Flags - Parks |
|
|
|
Taskers |
$220.00 |
|
|
Service & Repair Flagpole - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Technical Irrigation Imports |
$656.11 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
The Pursuits Group |
$813.78 |
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$583.00 |
|
|
Traffic Control - Quinns Rocks |
|
|
|
TPG Town Planning & Urban Design |
$5,808.00 |
|
|
Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan - Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
T-Quip |
$390.10 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$12,794.10 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf At Gumblossom Reserve - Parks |
|
|
|
Vertidrain At Various Parks |
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$653.95 |
|
|
Installed Two-Way Radios - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc |
$39,306.56 |
|
|
Advertising For Jun08 - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators |
$104.50 |
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency |
$634.89 |
|
|
Magazine Renewal - Library Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$10,158.70 |
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$641.10 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$196.87 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Western Irrigation |
$32,890.26 |
|
|
Service Pumping Equipment - Parks |
|
|
|
Weston Road Systems |
$7,462.40 |
|
|
Supply Glowline - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$398.82 |
|
|
Legal Fees For Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$1,234.37 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Worlds Best Products Pty Ltd |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$99.00 |
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$968.75 |
|
|
Waste Oil Collection – Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
|
00000785 |
05/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Library & Information Association |
$396.00 |
|
|
Leading Libraries Event - Library Services |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$68,670.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 01/08/08 |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$12.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 01/08/08 |
|
|
|
Councillor Laura Gray |
$730.60 |
|
|
Travel And Childcare Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf |
$8,158.34 |
|
|
Contract Management Fees For July08 |
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani |
$43.54 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
IPAA WA |
$120.00 |
|
|
Capable Organisations Morning Forum 24/07/08 - Attendee V Barry |
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo |
$95.79 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Kay Prentice |
$235.12 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Mr Bruce Waddell |
$43.54 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Mr Dennis Blair |
$59.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - 50% Broadband Usage 15/04/08-14/07/08 |
|
|
|
Mr Mark Dickson |
$60.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - 90% Broadband Usage 01/07/08-01/08/08 |
|
|
|
Mrs Fung Kuen Lucia Lam |
$60.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - 80% Broadband Usage 01-31/07/08 |
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty |
$139.33 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Mrs Vicki Hines |
$1,156.11 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Travel & Accommodation Expenses While Attending HR Conference In Adelaide |
|
|
|
Mrs Vivienne Conway |
$636.00 |
|
|
Study Assistance - Library & Heritage |
|
|
|
Ms Hazel Owen |
$43.54 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Ms Karen Caple |
$17.48 |
|
|
Reimbursement - 50% Broadband Usage 01/07-31/07/08 |
|
|
|
Peggy Brown |
$87.08 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment For Aug08 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$117.44 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00000786 |
12/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies |
$306.18 |
|
|
Supply First Aid Supplies - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving |
$917.40 |
|
|
Install Paving At Starrs Road Quinns Rocks - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Allerding & Associates |
$2,902.58 |
|
|
Consulting Fees - Soiland Appeal For City Of Wanneroo - Planning Services |
|
|
|
Allpack Signs |
$1,647.80 |
|
|
Various Signs - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Keep Left Sign - Engineering |
|
|
|
Altus Traffic |
$3,949.71 |
|
|
Traffic Control At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$385.93 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Aragon Education and Training |
$3,685.00 |
|
|
Performance Management Course 17 July – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$478.07 |
|
|
Safe Collection - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers |
$114.40 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$804.78 |
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
Beilby Corporation |
$11,940.50 |
|
|
Advertising For Director Planning & Sustainability Position |
|
|
|
First Instalment Assignment Director Planning & Sustainability - Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$1,983.11 |
|
|
Insurance Excess For 4 Council Vehicles - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Benedictine Community of New Norcia |
$877.80 |
|
|
Accommodation For HR Staff For Grassroots Events |
|
|
|
Best Roads Group |
$18,231.40 |
|
|
Linemarking At Ocean Reef Road |
|
|
|
Blyth Enterprises |
$130.90 |
|
|
Locking Castors For Youth Services |
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$204.60 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$278,134.11 |
|
|
Fuel Issues For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$343.76 |
|
|
Courier Services - Health Services |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$2,016.89 |
|
|
Various Items - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Bynorm |
$2,791.58 |
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
C & EM Harmer |
$75.40 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Marketing |
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$1,512.89 |
|
|
Cabcharge Services For The City |
|
|
|
Car Care (WA) Mindarie |
$100.00 |
|
|
Cleaning Of Fire Vehicles - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Cathedral Office Interiors Pty Ltd |
$135.26 |
|
|
Whiteboard - Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$6,150.00 |
|
|
- Various Council Functions - Hospitality |
|
|
|
- CEO's Farewell 4/07/08 - Hospitality |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$353.00 |
|
|
Mobile Phone - IT |
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$696.62 |
|
|
Equipment Hire - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$1,573.01 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Comsync Consulting |
$1,287.00 |
|
|
Consulting - Investigation Of Exchange Issues – IT Services |
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$6.61 |
|
|
Courier Services - Rangers |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$1,468.67 |
|
|
Various Items - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Cutting Edges Pty Ltd |
$776.18 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Dalcon Construction Pty Ltd |
$19,573.37 |
|
|
Progress Payment 7 - Animal Care Centre Additions |
|
|
|
Data Diction Pty Ltd |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
2008/2009 Membership For Local Information Network For Community Services - Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
Dept of Environment & Conservation |
$200.00 |
|
|
Clearing Permit Application For Alexander Drive Share Use Path Koondoola - Projects |
|
|
|
Dexion Balcatta |
$217.80 |
|
|
Stationary For HR |
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$566.50 |
|
|
Parenting Place Banner –Children’s Services |
|
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd |
$308.88 |
|
|
Granite Cold Mix - Engineering |
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$5,021.60 |
|
|
Vehicle Electrical Repairs - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
$1,061.50 |
|
|
Disposal Of Greenwaste |
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd |
$104.50 |
|
|
Rental Of Hydrolab Quanta For Wangara Sump - Conservation Maintenance |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$1,124.75 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
E-Pak Packaging Pty Ltd |
$1,409.76 |
|
|
Roadside Litter Collection Bags - Parks |
|
|
|
Essential Office Products Pty Ltd |
$82.50 |
|
|
Thermal Binding Strips - Governance |
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.) |
$17,897.00 |
|
|
Contract Maintenance For The Wheeled Sports Park Butler For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Contracted Maintenance For Butler Community Centre For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Find Wise |
$707.30 |
|
|
Location Of Services - Walyunga Boulevard Clarkson |
|
|
|
Friction Control |
$268.40 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,586.34 |
|
|
Various Items/Equipment Rental - Reprographics & Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
Gam's Mobile Welding Services |
$1,045.00 |
|
|
Supply/Install Awning At Butler Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Geoffs Tree Service |
$2,136.75 |
|
|
Firebreak Clearing For New Fence At Franklin Park |
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$7,026.25 |
|
|
Building Services Consultancy |
|
|
|
GM & J Lombardi Pty Ltd |
$111.57 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia |
$4,977.50 |
|
|
Graffiti Removal For Various Locations |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu |
$2,447.55 |
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$580.32 |
|
|
Tools For Parks |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$7,356.98 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$1,692.06 |
|
|
Health Technical Officer - Health Services |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$287.70 |
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients- Community Services |
|
|
|
Homecare Options |
$21,368.26 |
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
HOSECO - Hose & Fittings Warehouse |
$66.60 |
|
|
Various Items For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Humes |
$4,836.21 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Instant Marquee System |
$484.00 |
|
|
Hire Of Marquee - Conservation Maintenance |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable |
$25,749.20 |
|
|
Casual Labour Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Internet Business Corporation |
$3,014.00 |
|
|
Service/Support For New Website - Marketing & Communication Services |
|
|
|
IPWEA WA |
$110.00 |
|
|
Forum On Public Utilities 19/08/08 - Parks |
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$236.50 |
|
|
Medical Fees - Parks |
|
|
|
Joondalup Photo Design |
$1,051.88 |
|
|
Photography - Councillors On Location - Marketing |
|
|
|
Jupiter Images |
$2,111.89 |
|
|
Liquid Library Online 12 Months Dynamic Graphics - Marketing |
|
|
|
Knights |
$244.55 |
|
|
Animal Foodstuff – Rangers Services |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$19,364.43 |
|
|
Purchase Digital Multifunction Centre – IT Services |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For Various Departments |
|
|
|
L & T Venables |
$178.63 |
|
|
Various Items – Waste Services |
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire |
$157.30 |
|
|
Indoor Plant Rental July 2008 |
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
Verge Mowing At Connolly Drive - Parks |
|
|
|
LGnet |
$104.50 |
|
|
Online Advertising For Traffic Engineer/Technical Officer - 26/05-13/06/08 – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia |
$1,125.00 |
|
|
Membership Subscription For K Caple 2008/09 - Governance |
|
|
|
Membership Subscription For G Prus 2008/09 - Community Development |
|
|
|
Membership Subscription For J Love 2008/09 – Human Resources |
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd |
$936.83 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$47,624.50 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors |
$9,039.67 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Services |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Building & Health Service |
|
|
|
Mey Equipment |
$2,667.87 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd |
$1,171.95 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Various Items - Conservation |
|
|
|
Mossys Mini Excavations |
$4,488.00 |
|
|
Excavation Works At Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services |
$4,518.80 |
|
|
Plant Supply - Conservation |
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors |
$47,246.70 |
|
|
Landscaping - Yanchep/Two Rocks For July 2008 - Parks |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Streetscapes For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Planting At Hartman Drive |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Wangara Streetscapes |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Fortnightly Mowing Of Anchorage Drive Mindarie |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Pearsall Streetscapes |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Santa Barbara Dve Quinns Rock |
|
|
|
NewsXpress Ocean Keys |
$37.90 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$962.48 |
|
|
Window/Windscreen Repairs On 3 Council Vehicles - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited |
$2,299.00 |
|
|
Investment Advisory & Reporting Fee For July 2008 - Finance |
|
|
|
Optima Press |
$544.50 |
|
|
Printing - Business Support Kit For Planning Flyer - Economic Development |
|
|
|
Printing Of Castle Rascal Flyers - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
Orchid Cove Pty Ltd |
$63.60 |
|
|
Drycleaning - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Out and About Wine Tours Pty Ltd |
$3,690.00 |
|
|
Tours For Gold Program - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Paper Pak WA |
$393.80 |
|
|
Twist Top Bags - Marketing |
|
|
|
Carry Bags For City Welcome Packs – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Parins |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess For 2 Council Vehicles - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Perth Aluminium Scaffolds Pty Ltd |
$4,152.30 |
|
|
Scaffolding Work At Kingsway Indoor Sports Stadium - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Perth Stripes & Signs |
$7,650.00 |
|
|
Supply/Fit Signage To Ranger Vehicles |
|
|
|
Peter Wood Pty Ltd |
$910.80 |
|
|
Supply/Install Rural Fencing At Montrose Park |
|
|
|
Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd |
$57.00 |
|
|
Employment Law Update 01/2008 – Human Resources |
|
|
|
PPS Australia Pty Ltd |
$181.50 |
|
|
Document Holder – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$1,888.64 |
|
|
Alarm Monitoring For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$821.07 |
|
|
Various Items - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Rain Jacket - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$1,339.53 |
|
|
NDM Limestone Test - Starrs Road Quinns Rocks - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Pavement Investigation - Ocean Reef Road Wangara - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd |
$616.72 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$1,508.54 |
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Roaming Technologies Pty Ltd |
$1,155.00 |
|
|
Remove Existing Computer From Old Vehicles & Install In New Vehicles – Rangers Services |
|
|
|
Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$490.00 |
|
|
Resuscitation Requalification – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Safety World |
$132.00 |
|
|
Gloves For Parks |
|
|
|
Safetyquip |
$286.22 |
|
|
Safety Boots - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$963.94 |
|
|
Lift Services For The City |
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$824.44 |
|
|
Food/Beverages - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Sebel Furniture Ltd |
$971.85 |
|
|
Chairs - Capricorn Community House |
|
|
|
Sheridans For Badges |
$575.02 |
|
|
Badges - Marketing |
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$1,964.33 |
|
|
Professional Services For Gumblossom Reserve Changerooms - Projects |
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$206.01 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$77.81 |
|
|
Various Items - Community Development |
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$142.38 |
|
|
Spray Equipment - Conservation |
|
|
|
Stars Event Management |
$363.00 |
|
|
Conference - Virtualisation - The Impact Of Technology On Information Management 06/08/08 - 2 Attendees From Information Management |
|
|
|
Annual Conference - Australian Society Of Archivists 08/08/08 – 1 Attendee From Information Management |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$54.45 |
|
|
Cleaning Supplies - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$7,701.00 |
|
|
Depot Oil Recovery/Oil Separator - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service |
$508.97 |
|
|
Laundry Of City Linen - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Sun City News |
$550.00 |
|
|
Advertising In North Coast Link - Marketing |
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company |
$1,723.97 |
|
|
Various Signs - Parks |
|
|
|
Sussex Industries |
$240.92 |
|
|
Wooden Stakes - Conservation |
|
|
|
Technifire 2000 |
$749.70 |
|
|
Supply & Fit 2 LED Lights - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Technology One Ltd |
$1,595.00 |
|
|
Review Of Dog Register – IT Services |
|
|
|
Teravin Tools Pty Ltd |
$1,525.70 |
|
|
Tools For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
The Basketball Man Bountiful Industry P/L |
$680.00 |
|
|
Backboards For Butterworth Park - Parks |
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara |
$22.00 |
|
|
Lawn Roller - Parks |
|
|
|
The Printing Factory |
$257.28 |
|
|
Printing - Agenda Certificate Sheets - Governance |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$802.56 |
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$6,462.50 |
|
|
Traffic Control At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Totally Workwear |
$135.55 |
|
|
Boots - Conservation |
|
|
|
T-Quip |
$5,510.30 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Turbotech Turbochargers |
$2,191.13 |
|
|
Turbo Charger - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$1,610.84 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Tyrolit Australia Pty Ltd |
$685.30 |
|
|
Concrete Cutting Blades - Engineering |
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$34.10 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
United Equipment |
$57,156.22 |
|
|
Telehandler Hire - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Self Propelled Work Platform - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$28,973.12 |
|
|
Install Microwave Dish At High Road Tower - Licensed Link For 2-Way Radios – IT Services |
|
|
|
Tait TM8255 Programmed For Waste Truck - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
WA Kerbing |
$20,339.55 |
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Ocean Drive |
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Starrs Road |
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Civic Drive |
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Various Locations |
|
|
|
WA Profiling |
$580.80 |
|
|
Hire Of Bobcat, Profiler & Broom - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$23.51 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency |
$85.50 |
|
|
Newspapers - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$9,560.83 |
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$441.85 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$1,663.15 |
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess For 2 Council Vehicles - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$85.00 |
|
|
Name Badge - Governance |
|
|
|
Glass Trophy – Rangers Services |
|
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$93.17 |
|
|
Death Notice (Campbell) - Marketing |
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$1,227.94 |
|
|
Immunisation Programme - Health Services |
|
|
|
Westrac |
$75.92 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$1,085.57 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - CEO Recruitment – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$220.50 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms – Waste Services |
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$99.00 |
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Health Services |
|
|
|
YMCA Youth Headquarters |
$726.00 |
|
|
Mobile Youth Bus Visit Hocking 29/04/08 & 01/07/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
00000787 |
12/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Trucks Belmont |
$690,316.10 |
|
|
New Vehicle Purchases: 2 x Iveco Acco F2350G/260 6 x 4 Side Loader |
|
|
|
|
|
00000788 |
12/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$2,254.50 |
|
|
Mail Preparation July 2008 |
|
|
|
Billpay Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$162.90 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$738.90 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$261,374.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Bernice Duncan |
$55.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Day Care Centres |
|
|
|
Builders Registration Board |
$16,024.50 |
|
|
Collection Agency Fee - July 008 |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$96.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$546.61 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$836.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Councillor Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf |
$25,478.11 |
|
|
Carramar Golf Course Commissions For July 2008 |
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf |
$277.04 |
|
|
Expenditure Reimbursement For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd |
$20,721.38 |
|
|
Marangaroo Golf Course Commissions For July 2008 |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$2,417.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking |
$281,491.66 |
|
|
Insurance - Contract Works 08/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Councillors & Officers Liability 08/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Personal Accident 08/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Bushfire - 30/06/08-30/06/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Motor Vehicles 08/09 |
|
|
|
LGIS Liability |
$195,512.35 |
|
|
Insurance - Casual Hirers Liability 08/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Fidelity Guarantee 30/06/08-30/06/09 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Public Liability 30/06/08-30/06/09 |
|
|
|
LGIS Property |
$91,173.20 |
|
|
Insurance - Industrial Special Risks, Multi Risks/General Property 30/06/2008-30/06/2009 |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,115.60 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Ms Gemma French |
$94.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Fuel Costs For 95170 (Fuel Card Not In Vehicle) |
|
|
|
Ms Michelle Brennand |
$581.60 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Conference Expenses In Tamworth NSW |
|
|
|
Ruth Butler |
$75.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Day Care Centres |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$10,530.92 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 08/08/08 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$1,019.25 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00000789 |
18/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Councillor Alan Blencowe |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Anh Truong |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Brett Treby |
$1,833.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Glynis Monks |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Ian Goodenough |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Laura Gray |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Maureen Grierson |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Paul Miles |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Rudi Steffens |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Councillor Tracey Roberts |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
Mayor J Kelly |
$5,966.67 |
|
|
Mayoral Allowance $200 Paid To Rates PN150893 |
|
|
|
|
|
00000790 |
19/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
3 Australia |
$742.08 |
|
|
Pagers For Fire Services - 1/8/08-31/8/08 |
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$3,308.64 |
|
|
Postage Charges - July 08 |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$3,249.00 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
Bush Fire Brigade Quinns |
$445.80 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Catering Costs For Fire Fighter Training Course |
|
|
|
Councillor Anh Truong |
$754.53 |
|
|
Travel Allowances Oct 07 - Jun 08 |
|
|
|
Councillor Paul Miles |
$169.00 |
|
|
Travel Allowance May 08 |
|
|
|
Councillor Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
FESA |
$1,573.64 |
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For Community Fire Manager 27/6-31/07/08 |
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super Summit Client Service |
$409.64 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
Oricle Superannuation Fund |
$282.73 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
Salamanca Superannuation Fund |
$436.68 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund |
$192.02 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
TPS Retirement Fund |
$367.16 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$786.80 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Trust Company Superannuation Service Limited |
$65.29 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation |
$404,704.99 |
|
|
Payroll Ded: F/Ending 15/08/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
00000791 |
19/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists |
$225.00 |
|
|
Wheelchair Hoist Service/Repair - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Adventure Out (Stargap Pty Ltd) |
$1,350.00 |
|
|
Finding My Place Program - Libraries |
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
Starrs Road Paving - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
AIBS - WA Chapter |
$265.00 |
|
|
Conference 07/08/08 - Approval Of Unauthorised Buildings - Attendees T Skouros, D Majoski & D Hill |
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$30.75 |
|
|
Stamp - Building & Health Services |
|
|
|
Ambit Industries Pty Ltd |
$1,281.50 |
|
|
Rewire Single Chainwire Gate To Tennis Courts Parks |
|
|
|
Fence Repairs At Kingsway Netball Complex |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$253.83 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Another Angle Consulting & Training |
$450.00 |
|
|
Disability Awareness Training 07/08/08 – Human Recourse |
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$731.50 |
|
|
Air-conditioning Service At Kingsway International Sports |
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$1,259.50 |
|
|
Training - Excel Intro 06/08/08 – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers |
$189.20 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Auto Control Doors |
$269.28 |
|
|
Sliding Door Repairs At New Civic Centre |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$15,346.08 |
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$746.13 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Beryl Weston |
$60.00 |
|
|
Cleaning Of Hall At Girrawheen - Community Services |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$637.13 |
|
|
Various Items - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Bynorm |
$29.98 |
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
C & EM Harmer |
$659.40 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals – Mayor’s Office |
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$48.40 |
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$460.80 |
|
|
Mobile Handset And Accessories – IT Services |
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$1,689.51 |
|
|
Equipment Hire - Engineering |
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$443.14 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf At Starrs Road |
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$12.11 |
|
|
Courier Services – Ranger Services |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$1,243.77 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd |
$141.81 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
DA Information Services Pty Ltd |
$63.55 |
|
|
Magazine Renewal - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Daniels Sharpsmart Australia Pty Ltd |
$268.34 |
|
|
Supply Immunisation Equipments - Health Services |
|
|
|
David Golf & Engineering Pty Ltd |
$480.15 |
|
|
Tournament Golf Ball Washer - Parks |
|
|
|
Davson & Ward Pty Ltd |
$5,225.00 |
|
|
Cost Planning/Quantity Surveying Services For Wanneroo Library & Regional Museum - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Dexion Balcatta |
$1,972.52 |
|
|
Various Items - Strategic Projects |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$327.25 |
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
Dick Smith Electronics |
$99.90 |
|
|
Personal Alarms - Youth Services |
|
|
|
Domus Nursery |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd |
$18,534.62 |
|
|
Hepburn Avenue Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
DVG Wanneroo Mitsubishi |
$308.84 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Edgewater Communications |
$154.00 |
|
|
Service Call To Clarkson Library – IT Services |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$23,854.98 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Engineering |
|
|
|
Envirocare Systems |
$1,449.62 |
|
|
Washroom Cleaner & Waterless Urinal Cubes - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.) |
$16,769.50 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$617.50 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,022.56 |
|
|
Various Items/Equipment Rental - Reprographics |
|
|
|
Gecko Contracting Turf & Landscape Maintenance |
$11,540.10 |
|
|
Streetscape Maintenance For July 08 - Darch, Girrawheen, Koondoola, Landsdale, Madeley & Marangaroo |
|
|
|
Glenfords Tool Centre |
$1,658.95 |
|
|
Various Tools - Engineering |
|
|
|
Glenthorne Trailers & Sales |
$10,164.00 |
|
|
Trailer - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia |
$10,222.30 |
|
|
Graffiti Removal Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu |
$914.55 |
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$2,131.31 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$95.90 |
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Housing Industry Association Ltd |
$286.00 |
|
|
Registration For Residential Planning Codes 21/07/08 - Building Services |
|
|
|
Humes |
$440.00 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Ashby |
|
|
|
Integral Development |
$612.92 |
|
|
Executive Development Training – Human Resources |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable |
$45,761.19 |
|
|
Casual Labour Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Integrated Records and Information Solutions |
$4,114.00 |
|
|
Consultancy Services - File Plan & Develop Business Classification Scheme - Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
Internet Business Corporation |
$15,779.50 |
|
|
Public Website Development Implementation Services For July 08 - Marketing |
|
|
|
John Atkinson |
$600.00 |
|
|
Entertainment For Quinns Adult Day Centre |
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$2,763.20 |
|
|
Medical Fees - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$166.85 |
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For Various Departments |
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd |
$5,447.66 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$644.78 |
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$5,725.50 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors |
$5,537.46 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Health Act Prosecution - Health Services |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Dog Act Prosecution - Rangers |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Advice Interpretation Parking Local Law – Rangers Services |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Compensation Claim - Salamone Family |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Services |
|
|
|
Media Monitors WA Pty Ltd |
$922.08 |
|
|
Media Transcripts - Marketing |
|
|
|
Medical Hand |
$299.20 |
|
|
Immunisation Services - Waste |
|
|
|
Merriwa Supa IGA |
$57.13 |
|
|
Grocery Items - Youth Services |
|
|
|
Mey Equipment |
$3,771.10 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mirage Industries Pty Ltd |
$1,689.60 |
|
|
Repair Damaged Roller Shutter To The Reception Area At Hainsworth Leisure Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd |
$206.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services |
$24,431.00 |
|
|
Supply Of Various Plants - Conservation Maintenance |
|
|
|
Coastal Rehabilitation Project Yanchep & Two Rocks - Conservation |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Brushing At Claytons Beach |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Compass Park Central |
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors |
$28,485.06 |
|
|
Landscaping - Streetscape North |
|
|
|
North Lake Electrical Pty Ltd |
$7,980.50 |
|
|
Installation Of Safety Protection - Parks |
|
|
|
Nuford |
$40,941.38 |
|
|
Vehicle Purchase Ford Ranger 4x4 WN32909 |
|
|
|
Optima Press |
$6,070.90 |
|
|
Printing Of Rates Information |
|
|
|
Printing Of Fire Notice – Rangers Services |
|
|
|
Perth YMCA Youth Services |
$8,288.50 |
|
|
YMCA Mobile Youth Bus Visits At Various Locations - Youth Services |
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$36.70 |
|
|
Monitor Cable – IT Services |
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$1,620.24 |
|
|
24 Hour Monitoring Of Security Alarm Systems At 25 Locations 01/08-31/08/08 - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
PS Structures P/L |
$548,900.00 |
|
|
Application No 9 New Cultural & Learning Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
Pulse Design |
$1,519.10 |
|
|
Business Support Kit Previous Invoice Undercharged - Economic Development |
|
|
|
Quantum Multimedia Communications |
$252.69 |
|
|
SMS Account For Volunteer Fire Brigade |
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services |
$74,922.83 |
|
|
Cleaning Services - July 2008 |
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$13,876.28 |
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$150.00 |
|
|
First Aid - Community Services |
|
|
|
RSS Signs & Safety |
$9,677.25 |
|
|
Park Signs - Conservations |
|
|
|
Safety World |
$575.52 |
|
|
Safety Gear - Waste |
|
|
|
Safetyquip |
$173.80 |
|
|
Equipment - Waste |
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd |
$3,128.40 |
|
|
Surveillance Audit - Waste Services |
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$963.96 |
|
|
Lifts Services At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Sign A Rama |
$151.80 |
|
|
Signs For IT |
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$219.99 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sound Pack Solutions |
$339.57 |
|
|
CD Cases - Library Services |
|
|
|
Stress Free Maintenance |
$6,237.50 |
|
|
Building Surveyor Services |
|
|
|
Sun City News |
$550.00 |
|
|
Advertising - North Coast Link - Marketing |
|
|
|
Sun City Newsagency |
$39.90 |
|
|
West Australian Newspapers Period 14/7/08 To 10/8/08 - Yanchep Library |
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company |
$308.00 |
|
|
Various Street Names - Parks |
|
|
|
Technical Irrigation Imports |
$2,503.60 |
|
|
Controller Repairs For Carramar Golf - Parks |
|
|
|
The Carers |
$115.50 |
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara |
$160.00 |
|
|
Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
The Pursuits Group |
$770.77 |
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Thiess Pty Ltd |
$1,166.00 |
|
|
Cherry Picker Hire - Parks |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$590.26 |
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$1,229.25 |
|
|
Traffic Control Services - Engineering |
|
|
|
T-Quip |
$67.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Trophy Specialists |
$305.00 |
|
|
Plaques For Pioneers - Marketing |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$30,383.72 |
|
|
Weed Control To Traffic Islands - Parks |
|
|
|
Supply/Apply Fertilisers To Various Parks |
|
|
|
Verti Drain Kingsway Cricket - Parks |
|
|
|
Lay Turf Kingsway British Soccer - Parks |
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc |
$700.00 |
|
|
Practice Note Files For Reprographics |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency |
$779.57 |
|
|
Magazine Renewals - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$4,286.96 |
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$133.14 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$21,008.00 |
|
|
Plumbing Services For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$1,353.00 |
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$726.00 |
|
|
Name Badges For Various Staff |
|
|
|
Trophy/Medals For Hainsworth Table Tennis Competition - Youth Services |
|
|
|
Plaque - Butler Community Centre For Marketing |
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$2,784.51 |
|
|
Staff For Immunisation Program |
|
|
|
Wheelchair Sports WA Association Inc. |
$900.00 |
|
|
Wheelchair Basketball Session At Hainsworth Community Centre - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Whelans |
$819.50 |
|
|
Peg Boundaries For Wall At Ocean Reef Road - Projects |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$217.54 |
|
|
Legal Fees - ECU Tutoring Agreement - Libraries |
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$99.00 |
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Marketing |
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$414.25 |
|
|
Waste Oil Disposals - Waste |
|
|
|
WT Partnership Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
Surveyor Consultancy Services - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
|
00000792 |
19/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Cobey Industries |
$1,037,932.94 |
|
|
Payment Certificate No.5 - Kingsway Sporting Complex Redevelopment Stage 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
00000793 |
26/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Ace Industrial Distributors |
$462.00 |
|
|
Calibrate & Certify Tension Wrenches - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Aged & Community Services WA Inc |
$210.00 |
|
|
Food Safety Compliance Forum - Attendees N Taylor & H Ledesma |
|
|
|
AHG Paper & Magazine Delivery |
$32.80 |
|
|
Girrawheen Library Newspapers - Library Services |
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd |
$107.56 |
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Allwest Engineering Services |
$803.00 |
|
|
Drum Pump - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Altus Traffic |
$1,687.40 |
|
|
Traffic Control - Various Locations |
|
|
|
Ambit Industries Pty Ltd |
$632.50 |
|
|
Fence Repairs At Kingsway Netball Complex - Parks |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$2,135.50 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Angus & Robertson Pty Ltd |
$184.32 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
Arena Joondalup |
$442.49 |
|
|
Room Hire For Aquamotion Meeting - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Pool Hire For Aquamotion Dolphin Swim Program - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd |
$1,160.79 |
|
|
Asphalt - Engineering |
|
|
|
Atlas Steels Pty Ltd |
$3,073.40 |
|
|
Side Plate - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$3,707.00 |
|
|
Training - Assertive Communication - HR |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers |
$663.94 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Plants - Marketing & Communication Services |
|
|
|
Australian Turf Industries |
$54,795.62 |
|
|
Maintenance Works July 2008 - Carramar & Marangaroo Golf Courses |
|
|
|
Auto Control Doors |
$177.10 |
|
|
Service To Mobile Library Door - Library Services |
|
|
|
Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd |
$6,552.26 |
|
|
Payment Certificate No.11 - Butler Community Centre |
|
|
|
Battery World |
$878.70 |
|
|
Batteries - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess For 2 Council Vehicles - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$2,964.34 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
BGC Cement |
$353.41 |
|
|
Cement - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$1,991.76 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$3,922.28 |
|
|
Grease Gun - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Vanellus - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Bullivants Pty Ltd |
$108.66 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$522.72 |
|
|
Various Items - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Bynorm |
$504.63 |
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
C & EM Harmer |
$49.20 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Marketing & Communications |
|
|
|
C R Kennedy & Co Pty Ltd |
$244.19 |
|
|
Auto Level Repair - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Cafe Corporate |
$116.60 |
|
|
Cleaning Products For Elected Members Coffee Machine - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$1,422.68 |
|
|
Sand Supplies Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
CBC Bearings WA Pty Ltd |
$186.96 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$706.00 |
|
|
Mobile Phones - IT Services |
|
|
|
CJD Equipment Pty Ltd |
$289.41 |
|
|
Oil/Air Filter - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Clean Sweep |
$1,364.00 |
|
|
Roadsweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$5,219.72 |
|
|
Equipment Hire - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Concept Fencing |
$250.00 |
|
|
Repair Pine Lap Fencing Connolly Drive - Parks |
|
|
|
Corporate Express |
$17,663.79 |
|
|
Stationery For July 2008 |
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$45.72 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$904.38 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd |
$2,700.81 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cutting Edges Pty Ltd |
$562.54 |
|
|
Parts - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Dalcon Construction Pty Ltd |
$200,992.45 |
|
|
Payment Certificate No.7 - Gumblossom Reserve Changerooms |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$1,543.70 |
|
|
Locking Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
DME Contractors |
$107,819.02 |
|
|
Claim 2 - Ferrara Reserve |
|
|
|
Release Of Retention Ferrara Reserve |
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$259.55 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
$6,257.90 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$1,564.46 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.) |
$21,566.28 |
|
|
Butler Landscape Maintenance For July 08 |
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$5,280.00 |
|
|
Safety Audit & Compliance - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Ezi Tag Systems Pty Ltd |
$119.90 |
|
|
Ezitags For Book Club - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Find Wise |
$211.20 |
|
|
Location Of Services For 14 Starrs Rod Quinns Rock - Infrastructure Project |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,275.00 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For They City |
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,923.18 |
|
|
Equipment Rentals - Reprographics |
|
|
|
Gecko Contracting Turf & Landscape Maintenance |
$12,598.30 |
|
|
July 08 Streetscape Maintenance At Alexander Heights Parks |
|
|
|
Streetscape Maintenance - Additional Works July |
|
|
|
Streetscape Maintenance - Alexander Drive |
|
|
|
Gladstone MRM (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
Booking System - IT Services |
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$1,144.73 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$724.02 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$3,384.12 |
|
|
Health Technical Officer - Health Services |
|
|
|
Highline |
$8,773.00 |
|
|
New Painter/Carpenter Shed At Ashby Operation Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$1,668.21 |
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Depot Store |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$252.00 |
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Humes |
$5,558.25 |
|
|
Drainage Items Delivered To Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
ID Consulting Pty Ltd |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
Quarterly Subscription Profile.ID - IT Services |
|
|
|
Quarterly Subscription Forecast.ID - IT Services |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd - Accounts Receivable |
$44,609.47 |
|
|
Casual Labour Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Integrated Records and Information Solutions |
$8,470.00 |
|
|
Consultancy Services - Corporate Performance |
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$308.99 |
|
|
Grinder - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd |
$60.19 |
|
|
Rodia Suspension Strip - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
John Smart Removals |
$93.50 |
|
|
Dance Floor Set Up - Hospitality |
|
|
|
John Stevens Carpentry |
$2,860.00 |
|
|
Supply/Install Access Doors At Wanneroo Community Centre |
|
|
|
Kmart Joondalup |
$269.85 |
|
|
Your View Competition Prizes |
|
|
|
Scooter & Helmet - Youth Services |
|
|
|
Table Tennis Accessories - Community Links |
|
|
|
Landmark |
$638.10 |
|
|
Various Items - Conservation |
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor |
$6,160.00 |
|
|
Mowing Of Connolly Drive Verges - Parks |
|
|
|
Lawrence & Hanson |
$592.04 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Learning Centre Link |
$75.00 |
|
|
Membership Renewal 08/09 For Yanchep Community Centre |
|
|
|
M & K Bailey Accredited Newsagents |
$32.50 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Economic Development |
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd |
$9,237.77 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$359.30 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Company |
$988.96 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors |
$9,542.32 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Rate Assessment Objection - Rates |
|
|
|
Merriwa Supa IGA |
$119.06 |
|
|
Groceries For Youth Support Programs |
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$5,654.00 |
|
|
Centre Board/Removal Of Shade Sails - Parks |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Sports Benches At Tapping |
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre |
$642.05 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
MTU Detroit Diesel Australia |
$5,273.34 |
|
|
Transynd Synthetic Transmission Fluid - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services |
$295.90 |
|
|
Plant Supply - Conservation |
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$264.00 |
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
P & M Automotive Equipment |
$104.50 |
|
|
Service Of Electric Hoist - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
P Rond & Co |
$19,009.10 |
|
|
Vosnacos Park New Bore - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Pacific Brands |
$3,579.58 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Pirtek Malaga Pty Ltd |
$5,039.45 |
|
|
Vehicle Hoses For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting |
$18,021.11 |
|
|
Works At Various Parks - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sandpit Cleaning - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Podiatry Services |
$6,312.90 |
|
|
Podiatry Services - Community Development |
|
|
|
PPG Industries Australia Pty Ltd |
$49.57 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Proquip Machinery |
$825.00 |
|
|
Hire Of Picker - Parks |
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$5,783.41 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd |
$589.41 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management |
$1,554.40 |
|
|
Recall Services - Information Management |
|
|
|
Recreation Safety Australia |
$748.00 |
|
|
Playground Safety Audits - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi |
$99.00 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd |
$27.00 |
|
|
Water Delivery To Hainsworth Centre |
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$11,491.17 |
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
RSS Signs & Safety |
$14,137.86 |
|
|
Install Signage - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd |
$71.53 |
|
|
Lighting Standards Downloaded - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
Sanax St Andrews Pharmacy |
$655.15 |
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Schiavello Wa Pty Ltd |
$741.40 |
|
|
Office Furniture (Mobile Pedestal) - Smart Growth |
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$9,977.00 |
|
|
Printing – What’s Happening Newsletter - Marketing |
|
|
|
Skipper Trucks Belmont |
$466.30 |
|
|
Vehicle Service - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$402.47 |
|
|
Cleaning Supplies - Depot Store |
|
|
|
STIHL Shop Greenwood |
$286.54 |
|
|
Parts - Parks |
|
|
|
Sun City News |
$6,221.60 |
|
|
Advertising For August 2008 - Marketing |
|
|
|
Advertising - 19/8/08 For Community Arts -Cultural Services |
|
|
|
Sunny Brushware Supplies |
$1,034.55 |
|
|
Brushware - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company |
$5,035.97 |
|
|
Post/Extra Light - Engineering |
|
|
|
Various Street Names - Engineering |
|
|
|
Tennant Company |
$418.77 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
The Pool Table Man |
$400.00 |
|
|
Recloth Pool Table At Hainsworth Youth Centre |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$566.84 |
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$4,556.76 |
|
|
Traffic Control Services - Engineering |
|
|
|
Toyota Material Handling (WA) Pty Ltd |
$282.70 |
|
|
Parts - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Air Filter - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
T-Quip |
$358.75 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$87,053.23 |
|
|
Citywide Weed Spraying - Parks |
|
|
|
Weed Control At Connolly Drive Median - Parks |
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$1,011.56 |
|
|
Two-Way Mobile Radio - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc |
$61,183.65 |
|
|
07/08 Membership Annual Subscriptions WALGA |
|
|
|
Biodiversity Annual Subscription LG Act Guide |
|
|
|
Local Law Annual Subscription |
|
|
|
Tax Services Annual Subscription |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$190.81 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency |
$1,403.19 |
|
|
Magazine Renewals - Library Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$2,066.70 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$1,847.89 |
|
|
Plumbing Services For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$90.00 |
|
|
Name Badges - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$150.98 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Westcare Industries |
$319.00 |
|
|
Safety Clothing - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Westernex Supply |
$303.60 |
|
|
Bag Polywoven - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Westrac |
$579.03 |
|
|
Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$290.05 |
|
|
Wanneroo BMX Raceway Club Inc - Extension Of Lease - Contracts & Property |
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$481.51 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Parks |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
YMCA Youth Headquarters |
$2,541.00 |
|
|
YMCA Bus Visit At Hocking - Youth Services |
|
|
|
Youth Affairs Council of WA |
$350.00 |
|
|
2008-2009 Organisational Membership For Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
|
00000794 |
26/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$162.90 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$738.90 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$262,316.00 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$96.00 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$546.61 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$836.00 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Councillor Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$2,417.00 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking |
$554.40 |
|
|
Insurance - Motor Vehicle 08/09 |
|
|
|
LGIS Property |
$2,366.23 |
|
|
Insurance - 30.06.08 To 30.06.09 |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,115.60 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Mr Geoffrey Whyte |
$131.13 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Foodstuffs Staff/Contractor Sausage Sizzle For Innovative Children’s Playspace |
|
|
|
Ms Miriam Best |
$51.46 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Petrol Expenses As Fuel Card Was Not Accepted |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$10,530.92 |
|
|
Being Payroll Ded: F/Ending 22/08/08 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$195.43 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00000795 |
29/08/2008 |
|
|
|
|
GC Sales (WA) |
$1,116,510.01 |
|
|
Claim 3 - Recycling Bins For Waste Services |
|
|
|
Final Claim - Recycling Bins For Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$8,125,448.52 |
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
00070335 |
08/07/2008 |
L Stevens |
-$75.00 |
00070234 |
01/07/2008 |
PBTL |
-$77.84 |
00070036 |
17/06/2008 |
PBTL |
-$77.36 |
00069912 |
10/06/2008 |
PBTL |
-$137.98 |
00070237 |
02/07/2008 |
PBTL |
-$11.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
-$380.07 |
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
Cell 6 |
31/08/2008 |
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Bikini Girls Massage |
$548.34 |
|
|
|
|
Cell 5 |
31/08/2008 |
ACP Settlements - Purchase of 471 Gnangara Road & Settlement Fees |
$157,968.03 |
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Bikini Girls Massage |
$548.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$159,064.71 |
|
|
|
|
MANUAL JOURNALS |
|||
|
|
Recoup From 01-11 August 08 |
$1,142,756.42 |
|
|
Recoup From 12-19 August 08 |
$2,424,787.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$3,567,543.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Municipal Recoup |
$ 9,778,775.72 |
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account |
|||
|
|
Payroll Payments August 2008: |
|
|
|
Payment of Wages |
$22,177.39 |
|
|
Payment of Wages |
$997,146.42 |
|
|
Payment of Wages |
$8,526.74 |
|
|
Payment of Wages |
$998,538.49 |
|
|
Payment of Wages |
$11,572.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total |
$2,037,961.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees August 2008: |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fees |
$592.04 |
|
|
CBA Pos Fee Waste Services Eftpos |
$59.00 |
|
|
CBA Pos Fee |
$146.78 |
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$300.00 |
|
|
Line Fee |
$208.30 |
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$605.05 |
|
|
COMMBIZ Fee |
$1,160.84 |
|
|
BPAY Fee |
$969.27 |
|
|
BPOINT Fee |
$29.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees |
$4,070.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments August 2008: |
|
|
|
D Blair |
|
|
|
Parking 2/8/08 |
$22.20 |
|
|
Taxi 2/8/08 |
$34.52 |
|
|
Accommodation for IPWEA Conference, Coffs Harbour |
$538.00 |
|
|
Taxi 5/8/08 |
$34.08 |
|
|
IPWEA Meeting - D Blair, I Barker, H Singh, R Greening, R Hewitt |
$110.00 |
|
|
UDIA Conference - D Blair & I Barker 16/9/08 |
$570.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Paton |
|
|
|
EMT Breakfast 25/7/08 |
$110.10 |
|
|
Parking Fees 31/7/08 |
$11.40 |
|
|
Parking Fees 2/8/08 |
$15.00 |
|
|
Business Meeting - J Paton & D Simms 21/8/08 |
$38.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments |
$1,483.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque 1-11 August 2008 |
$1,142,756.42 |
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque 12-19 August 2008 |
$6,211,232.14 |
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque 20-31 August 2008 |
$2,424,787.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$9,784,329.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$11,822,290.61 |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S13/0002V11
File Name: BB July Financial Activity Statement.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Coordinator Management Accounting
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the 2008/2009 Financial Activity Statements for the period ended 31 July 2008 and adopt a percentage for the reporting of material variances.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration has opted to present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and in a similar format to that presented in the 2008/2009 Annual Budget. This format separates Revenue and Expenses from Other Revenue and Expenses and provides improved disclosure of City’s underlying Operating Result.
The Financial Activity Statement is in the form of an Income Statement, which compares year to date actual income and expenses with the year to date budget, shows variances and the adopted and revised budgets (if any). It is accompanied by information relating to Capital Projects, an Investment Portfolio Summary and Statement of Net Current Assets.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For 2007/2008 the Council adopted 10% for the reporting of variances and the same percentage is proposed for 2008/2009.
Detail
Comments on the year to date financial performance are set out below.
Consultation
Nil
Comments
The following comments are provided on the result of the Income Statement for the period ended 31 July 2008:
Income Statement (Attachment 1 refers)
Net Result $ million
Year to Date Actual - 1.719
Year to Date Budget - 6.593
Year to Date Variance 4.874 (+74%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 49.440
Full Year Revised Budget 49.463
The following information is provided on key aspects of the year to date financial results:-
Revenues $ million
Year to Date Actual 2.529
Year to Date Budget 5.191
Year to Date Variance - 2.662 (-51%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 102.521
Full Year Revised Budget 102.522
The City’s annual Rating Income is not raised through the accounts until August however some monies ($0.010 million) have already been received year to date.
Under the Operating Grants and Subsidies area only $0.550 million has been receipted in July
(-69%). As the year progresses Administration staff will be liaising closely with funding bodies to ensure outstanding amounts are received.
As with Grants and Subsidies, the Contributions, Reimbursements and Donations are running well behind the budget for the first month of the year with only $0.054 million received, representing a -79% variance.
Other Revenue is well under budget at this point in time, to the effect of –83% ($0.286 million). This is mainly due to timing difference particularly in regards to the invoicing of external parties.
Expenses $ million
Year to Date Actual - 5.999
Year to Date Budget - 7.984
Year to Date Variance 1.985 (+25%)
Full Year Adopted Budget -105.696
Full Year Revised Budget -105.674
Employee Costs, which represents approximately 43% of the full year budgeted expenses, are below budget by $0.426 million (+13%). The main factors effecting this favourable variance are vacancies within some areas and newly created positions not yet filled. It is expected that over the course of the financial year that this variance will be minimal.
Materials and Contracts costs are well under the year to date budget estimates to the value of $1.310 million (+51%). At this early stage of the year expenditures in this area are generally slow to begin with but is still estimated to meet it’s targets by year-end.
Utilities are under budget to the value of $0.244 million (+60%), which is primarily due to the timing of the payments.
No Interest Expenses are budgeted to be paid until later in the year. These costs relate to a repayment plan to Western Australia Treasury Corporation, for the loan drawn down previously entered into for the City to assist in capital funding purposes.
Other Revenue and Expenses $ million
(excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Year to Date Actual 1.750
Year to Date Budget - 3.800
Year to Date Variance 5.550 (+146%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 22.615
Full Year Revised Budget 22.615
In both categories of Grants and Subsidies and Contributions, Reimbursements and Donations, no funds were expected within the month of July. However year to date figures show that the City has already received $0.298 million and $0.071 million respectively.
With Town Planning Schemes, income has been received to the City of $1.383 million, which is a 426% positive variance to budget to July. Only minimal expenses have been made ($0.002 million) year to date.
Contributions of Physical Assets $ million
Year to Date Actual 0.000
Year to Date Budget 0.000
Year to Date Variance 0.000 (0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 30.000
Full Year Revised Budget 30.000
With regard to Physical Assets Contributed by Developers, the City has not recognised any values to July month end. It is expected for these amounts to be advised and accordingly accounted for towards the end of the financial year.
Capital Projects
The current status of the Capital Projects, for the first month of the 2009 financial year, is summarised below, by Program Category:
Capital Program Category |
End of Year Current Budget |
Year to Date Actual |
Year to Date Commitments |
Year to Date Total |
Description |
$ million |
$ million |
$ million |
$ million |
Community |
15.286 |
0.006 |
10.682 |
10.688 |
Conservation |
1.021 |
0.000 |
0.051 |
0.051 |
Corporate |
6.462 |
0.084 |
0.193 |
0.277 |
Drainage |
0.717 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Investment |
11.213 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Recreation and Sport |
16.809 |
0.702 |
8.796 |
9.498 |
Capital Program Category |
End of Year Current Budget |
Year to Date Actual |
Year to Date Commitments |
Year to Date Total |
Description |
$ million |
$ million |
$ million |
$ million |
Transport |
34.152 |
0.320 |
5.369 |
5.689 |
Waste Management |
8.907 |
1.280 |
2.129 |
3.411 |
Total |
94.567 |
2.392 |
27.211 |
29.614 |
It should be noted that the year to date actual expenditure relates to the cash position and does not include commitments. Part of the commitments indicated above relate to works to be carried out in 2009/2010.
To further expand on the Capital Program information above, details of the top 10 projects by value have been listed in the table below:
Capital Projects |
End of Year Current Budget |
Year to Date Actual |
|
Description |
$ million |
$ million |
Comments |
Wanneroo Cultural and Learning Centre |
13.498 |
0.006 |
On target for June 2009 completion. |
Develop Industrial Estate - Neerabup |
8.407 |
0.000 |
Start delayed pending environmental report. |
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Upgrade |
6.470 |
0.030 |
Progressing well. |
Mirrabooka Ave Carriageway |
6.127 |
0.004 |
Start delayed due to environmental and service design issues. |
Aquamotion Upgrade |
5.700 |
0.780 |
On target for Oct 2008 completion. |
Hartman Drive Carriageway - Madeley |
5.006 |
0.007 |
Start delayed due to environmental and service design issues. |
Ocean Reef Road Carriageway |
4.700 |
0.000 |
On track. |
Pinjar Road Realignment – Wanneroo and Carosa |
3.585 |
0.000 |
Start delayed due to environmental and service design issues. |
Hartman Drive Carriageway - Wangara |
3.163 |
0.000 |
On track. |
Pinjar Road - Carosa to Tapping |
2.588 |
0.000 |
Start delayed due to environmental and service design issues. |
Investment Portfolio Summary (Attachment 2 refers)
As at 30 July 2008 the City holds an investment portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $128,682,466. The current yield for the portfolio is weighted average at 8.45%.
Net Current Assets
The current composition of the Net Current Assets for the City is outlined below:
Year to Date End of Year
Actual Budget
$ million $ million
Current Assets
Cash & Cash Equivalents – Unrestricted 16.875 13.374
Cash & Cash Equivalents - Restricted 111.807 79.995
Receivables 8.021 5.152
Inventories 0.272 0.296
136.975 98.817
Current Liabilities
Payables and Provisions -18.286 -18.767
Net Current Assets 118.689 80.050
Less Cash & Cash Equivalents – Restricted -111.807 -79.995
Estimated Surplus/(Deficiency) carried forward 6.882 0.0550
Statutory Compliance
The monthly financial report for the period ended 31 July 2008 complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Outcome 4 – Governance – “Leadership and Community engagement to ensure the best use of our physical, financial and human resources”.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1 and 2.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 July 2008; and
2. ADOPTS a percentage of 10% for the purposes of the reporting of material variances by Nature and Type monthly for the 2008/2009 financial year, in accordance with Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S25/0077V01
File Name: CA Proposed Lease to Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club Inc over Portion of Reserve 40012 Wanneroo.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Property Officer
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider entering into a new lease with the Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club Inc (the Club) over portion of Crown Reserve 40012.
Background
The Club premises is situated on Swan Location 10842, being portion of Crown Reserve 40012 and is adjacent to Nanovich Park, which is leased to the Wanneroo Trotting Training Club Inc (Attachment 1 refers). The land is vested to the City of Wanneroo for the purpose of “Equestrian Purposes” under a Vesting Order dated 29 July 1997 and comprises Swan Locations 10842 and 12727 with the power to lease over Swan Location 10842 only. The whole reserve is designated as Bush Forever and therefore its associated constraints apply.
The Club provides equestrian associated services and its main aims are to encourage young people to ride and enjoy all kinds of sports connected with horses and riding, to provide instruction and conduct examinations to attain equestrian certificates in riding and horse mastership and to instil in members the proper care of their animals.
It has approximately 90 active members, the majority of which are aged between 10 and 17 years, and services the equestrian interests of the northern suburbs of Perth. It meets on the second Sunday of the month and its senior riders meet on a Saturday. In addition to these meets the Club holds several events during the year to promote equestrian sport including three Closed Gymkhanas, playing host to the Adult Riding Equestrian Club during the week and supports a Show Horse Squad which meets once a month. It also has training sessions in the lead up to its Pony Club Association of WA State Events in various Olympic disciplines such as Dressage and Showjumping.
The Club has attained Provisional Status by the Riding for the Disabled and is working towards full accreditation in the coming year.
The facility has been occupied by the Club for the past 21 years under a lease that expired on 31 August 2008 and continues to occupy the premises in holdover under the same terms and conditions.
In November 2005 the West Australian Planning Commission published a draft document for public comment called the “East Wanneroo Land Use and Water Management Strategy – November 2005” (EWLUWMS) which addresses land use in relation to converting areas from rural to urban, and water management strategies in East Wanneroo. It is anticipated that the recommended outcomes are likely, in the longer term, to have an effect on the existing rural surroundings adjacent to Reserve 40012 and the future viability of the equine industry in the region.
City officers have been in general discussion with the Club since April 2007 in relation to negotiation of a new lease term and the possible impact of the EWLUWMS on the term of any new lease.
Detail
A meeting was held on 19 August 2008 to formally discuss and negotiate a proposal for a new lease. At that meeting it was requested the Club prepare a business plan outlining its projected revenue and expenditure during the lease term and any potential future capital upgrades to the facility that it may be considering.
Under the City’s Tenancy Policy, adopted by Council in 2004, the Club is considered to be a ‘Non Commercial’ entity and negotiations are to be carried out in accordance with the ‘Criteria’ outlined in the policy. The general principle to apply is that the use of the premises is on a no cost to the City basis.
Given the potential impact of urbanisation as a consequence of the EWLUWMS on the region a formal lease proposal was forwarded to the Club on 21 August 2008 outlining the essential terms of a proposed lease for a maximum total six (6) year term comprising of an initial lease term of three (3) years and an option to renew for a further three (3) years, including a requirement for the Club to produce a business plan. It has subsequently been agreed that a six (6) year lease term with no options would be more practical in this instance.
Subject to approval by Council and the Minister for Lands, it is therefore proposed that the City enter into a lease with the Club on the following essential terms:-
Lease Rental |
$1.00 per annum |
Lease Term |
Six (6) years |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2008 |
Additional Payment (Asset Preservation Fund) |
$200 per annum based on the combined value of the existing structures on the lease area in accordance with the City’s Tenancy Policy. |
Rates, Taxes and Outgoings |
The Lessee will be responsible for all rates, taxes, assessments, impositions and outgoings of whatsoever nature together with all outgoings for water consumption, electricity, gas, telephone used in relation to the Premises, whether billed directly or otherwise. |
Insurance |
Lessee responsibility. |
Statutory Compliance |
Lessee responsibility. |
Bush Forever |
The Lessee acknowledges the Premises is designated as Bush Forever and that no clearing is to be conducted on the leased area without prior consent from the City. |
Comment
The Club provides an equestrian based recreational service to the northern suburbs of Perth, as does the Wanneroo Trotting Training Club Inc located on the adjoining reserve. There are very few clubs of this nature to accommodate equestrian interests in the metropolitan area north of Perth and the land’s purpose is clearly defined.
Given the uncertainty of the medium to long-term future of the equine industry as a result of the EWLUWMS Administration suggests that the term of the proposed new lease should reflect this unknown element and that a six (6) year lease term is considered the most appropriate timeframe for a new lease at this point in time. Whilst it is not proposed to make the lease conditional upon the preparation of a business plan City officers will be working with the Club to develop a six (6) year business plan in particular concentrating on the impact of the EWLUWMS and the future viability of the Club.
This will be an ongoing process during the term of the lease.
Statutory Compliance
The lease would be considered an exempt disposition under Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, which states:-
“30(2) A disposition of land is an exempt disposition if –
(b) the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not –
(i) the objects of which are of a charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational, sporting or other like nature; and
(ii) the members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit from the body’s transactions;”
This means that a local public notice is not required before disposition.
Strategic Implications
The proposed lease is consistent with the City’s 2006 – 2021 Strategic Plan as follows:-
“2.3.1 Provide or facilitate access to services and facilities that support inclusive communities; and
4.1 Improve strategic partnerships”
Policy Implications
The proposed lease is consistent with the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Financial Implications
The lease has been negotiated on a ‘no cost to the City’ basis and would result in the recoup of such costs as rates, with the Lessee responsible for direct costs such as building maintenance, electricity, gas and telephone charges.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the leasing of Swan Location 10842 on portion of Reserve 40012, Wanneroo to the Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club Inc, for a term of six (6) years, commencing 1 October 2008, subject to the consent of the Minister for Lands; and
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a lease between the City and the Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club Inc.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P22/0418V04
File Name: CA Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Long Stay Tenancy Arrangements.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Coordinator Property & Leasing
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider formalising long-stay tenancy arrangements at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park as a result of the introduction of the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006.
Background
The Quinns Rocks Caravan Park (the Park) is located on a portion of the City’s freehold Lot 211, Quinns Road, Mindarie contained in Certificate of Title Volume 485 Folio 181A being an area of approximately 2.1 hectares and zoned ‘Parks and Recreation’.
The Park, which is under management on behalf of the City, comprises an office and residence, ablution block and laundry, BBQ area, 59 powered sites and a small un-powered area at the rear of the Park. Currently the 59 powered sites are utilised as follows:
· 33 Casual Sites fees charged in accordance with the City’s Fees and Charges Schedule for use by casual/holiday users (includes 4 on-site caravans).
· 5 Semi-permanent caravans privately owned but not occupied as principle place of residence - these sites did not qualify as long term permanent residents and were not offered tenancy agreements (leases) in 2002 (CS04-07/02 refers).
· 21 Leases long-term residential tenancy agreements (leases) commencing 1 October 2002 and expiring on 31 August 2012 (CS04-07/02 refers).
The 26 sites occupied either permanently under a lease or semi-permanently are not available for use for casual/holiday use and represent 44% of the total sites at the Park. This ratio aligns closely to the requirement for the Park to have a maximum of 40% permanent residents as outlined in 2001 by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) in consideration of the Lot 211 Ocean Drive, Mindarie Structure Plan No 28.
The 44% of sites occupied to the exclusion of casual/holiday users has decreased significantly since 2002 when, at that time, sites occupied by permanents, semi-permanents and on-site vans owned by the Park Managers represented 66%. Since then permanents and semi-permanents without leases have reduced by half, some of the on-site vans are now owned by the City and available for casual/holiday use and others have been removed, and the number of leased sites has reduced from twenty eight to twenty one resulting in the overall casual sites available increasing from thirteen to thirty three.
Detail
In 2005 it was seen that tenancy circumstances of residents of residential parks (caravan parks) are distinctly different from traditional residential tenancy arrangements entered into under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 in that there are park rules in place, provision of services for which fees may be charged and, as is the case here, where generally the dwellings are owned by the tenant with the site owned by the park operator (the City).
In late 2006 new legislation entitled the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006 was enacted and effectively applies to any tenant of a caravan park that has been living at the park for a period longer than three months. The main purpose of this legislation was to specifically regulate the relationship between the owner of a residential park and a tenant, where the tenant owns a dwelling and occupies a site owned by the park operator or the tenant occupies a dwelling owned by the park operator on a site owned by the park operator.
Whilst the existing long-term tenancy arrangements (leases) that expire in August 2012 are not affected by this new legislation, nor are the five semi-permanent sites because they are not permanently occupied as a place of residence, three of the sites set aside for casual/holiday use are or have been occupied by persons for longer than three months. As a result the occupants of these particular sites are deemed to be long-stay tenants and entitled to residential agreements in the form prescribed under the new long-stay legislation.
In February 2008, to comply with the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006, the City was bound and reluctantly offered the occupant of Site 16 a long-stay agreement for a term of three months (the minimum allowable). The tenant was at odds with the City, had refused payment of rent and would certainly not have been offered a formal tenancy had it not been required under the legislation. Fortunately the offer was not accepted and the City was able to evict this tenant after following the due processes under the new legislation.
Circumstances surrounding the other two sites, being Site 46 and Site 60 (Attachment 1 refers), are significantly different with the tenants of both sites currently paying a weekly site fee of $125 based on the rate set out in the Fees and Charges Schedule for the use of a site longer than 4 weeks, and no problems associated with their occupancy have been experienced to date. The occupant of Site 46 has been living at the Park since May 2007 with the occupant of Site 60 having been there since December 2006.
Whilst it is preferable not to have any additional tenancy agreements at the Park beyond those approved by Council in 2002 the new legislation has forced the City to recognise that there are some long-stay arrangements in place that need to be formalised.
It should be noted that it is not always known the likely duration of a tenant and a short-stay can continue on depending on circumstances, which is the case in these instances. Offers have been made to the occupants of both sites, again in compliance with the new legislation, (with the term of the agreements subject to Council approval) and it is not considered that these sites would be deemed ‘permanent’ given the relatively short term nature of the proposed agreements thereby not adversely affecting the casual site ratio.
It is therefore proposed that the long-stay tenancy agreements for Sites 46 and 60 be for a fixed term of six (6) months commencing 1 October 2008 and the agreements are ‘site-only’ agreements as the caravans are owned by the individual tenants.
Comment
There is an emphasis on keeping the Park available, as much as possible, as a tourist park together with the WAPC requirement to keep at least 60% of the sites at the Park for casual/holiday use. The situation of having a tenant remaining at the park for longer than three months should therefore be avoided in the future albeit that some tenants or seniors see a caravan park as a place that is affordable. The managers of the Park are also continually asked whether sites are available for a place of residency for fly-in fly-out workers and the like and have been instructed to ensure that only true holiday-makers be allowed to stay.
Given the long-stay tenancies are in accordance with the requirements of the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006, Administration seeks the approval of Council to the agreements being limited to six (6) months. It is not anticipated that these leases would be extended beyond that time.
Statutory Compliance
The long-stay tenancy agreements for Sites 46 and 60 are in compliance with the requirements of the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006 and the Residential Tenancy Act 1987 does not apply to them.
The land (sites) has been disposed of at the time it became occupied but for the purposes of the requirements of section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 the disposition is exempt because it is the leasing of residential property (Regulation 30(2)(g) refers).
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
The long-stay tenancy arrangements have been negotiated in accordance with the City’s Tenancy Policy in relation to residential tenancies but in compliance with the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006 rather that the Residential Tenancies Act 1987.
Financial Implications
Nil. Sites 46 and 60 are currently occupied at the fee set in the City’s Fees and Charges Policy relating to the Park at $125 per week (plus power).
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the site only long-stay tenancy agreements for Sites 46 and 60 at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park for a fixed term of six (6) months commencing 1 October 2008 in accordance with the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006; and
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to and execute the long-stay tenancy agreements between the City and the tenant of Site 46 and Site 60.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: C08028V01
File Name: EA Tennder No 08028 The Provision of Streetscape Maintenance South for a Period of Two 2 Years.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Services
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: John Watson, Parks Technical Officer
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08028 for the Provision of Streetscape Maintenance South within the City of Wanneroo for a period of two years.
Background
The City is responsible for the maintenance of streetscape locations throughout the City of Wanneroo. Streetscapes include areas such as entry statements, roundabouts, median islands and verges. This service has been contracted out for the past five years to enable in-house staff and resources to be assigned to other maintenance activities such as parks maintenance and development, building surrounds and tree pruning activities.
Detail
Tenders Received
Tender No 08028 was advertised on 12 July 2008 and closed in the City’s offices at 3pm on Tuesday, 29 July 2008. A mandatory meeting was held at 1 pm on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 at the Ashby Operations Centre. Failure to attend the mandatory information meeting disqualified the tenderer from consideration or evaluation in this tender. The five contractors that attended were Newscape Contractors, Greenworx Commercial Maintenance Pty Ltd, Gecko Contracting, DCCM and Manicured Lawns.
Details of the tender are shown in the following table.
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
Two years |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2008 |
Expiry Date |
30 September 2010 |
Extension to Contract |
Optional 12 Months or part thereof |
Rise and fall included |
No (CPI increase on extension) |
Tender submissions were received from Newscape Contractors, Greenworx Commercial Maintenance Pty Ltd and Gecko Contracting. Manicured Lawns submitted a tender but their faxed schedule of rates was incomplete and insufficient to adequately evaluate. Manicured Lawns were contacted and asked to provide further information pertaining to their schedule of rates. They were unable to provide the additional information required in time to evaluate their submitted tender and was therefore classed as non-compliant.
The tender evaluation team, comprising of the Contracts Officer, Parks Supervisor and the Parks Technical Officer evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria and weightings:
Item No |
Description |
Score |
1. |
Price for services offered |
40% |
2. |
Tenderer’s resources assigned to this contract |
20% |
3. |
Tenderer’s previous experience and ability to complete works with existing commitments |
20% |
4. |
Occupational health and safety (OHS) |
20% |
Price for services offered
A completed schedule of rates was received from the three contractors. The schedule of rates total for years one and two was adjusted consistently to reflect a minor amendment to the scope and is identified in the table below.
N.B. It is also acknowledged that Gecko provided consent to giving the City a 2.5% discount for invoices that are paid within 14 days of receipt by the City although this is not taken into account in the evaluation of the price for services offered.
This criterion represents 40% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Mean Price |
Ranking |
Newscape |
$267,775 |
$283,842 |
$275,809 |
3 |
Greenworx |
$213,382 |
$223,884 |
$218,633 |
1 |
Gecko |
$249,885 |
$257,205 |
$253,545 |
2 |
Tenderer’s resources assigned to this contract
All tenderer’s provided sufficient evidence to support their resources available to this contract and were therefore awarded an equal score.
This criterion represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Newscape |
1 |
Greenworx |
1 |
Gecko |
1 |
Tenderer’s previous experience and ability to complete works with existing commitments
All tenderers were assessed on the extent of their experience and ability to service this contract given existing commitments to their clients. Newscape Contractors, Greenworx and Gecko have relevant experience in landscape maintenance. Newscape Contractors and Gecko however showed greater experienced within the streetscape maintenance area and were therefore scored accordingly.
The criterion represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Newscape |
1 |
Greenworx |
2 |
Gecko |
1 |
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS)
The tenderers were assessed for evidence of occupational health and safety.
Newscape Contractors and Gecko Contracting provided a comprehensive and specific occupational health and safety management system.
Greenworx provided an adequate occupational health and safety management system.
This criterion represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Newscape |
1 |
Greenworx |
2 |
Gecko |
1 |
Summary Ranking
The overall weighted score resulted in the following ranking:
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Newscape |
2 |
Greenworx |
3 |
Gecko |
1 |
Comment
Newscape Contractors, Greenworx and Gecko submitted tenders for Streetscape Maintenance South. It is acknowledged by the tender evaluation team that the three contractors submitted adequate evidence to enable an evaluation. Taking into account the assessment criteria and ranking, the tender evaluation team is confident that Gecko Contracting will be able to successfully service the contract for Streetscape Maintenance South and is therefore recommended as the successful tenderer.
Statutory Compliance
The tender has been evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Contracts and Property has reviewed the tender evaluation for compliance and fairness and is satisfied with the process.
Strategic Implications
The Provision of Streetscape Maintenance is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) goals and strategies:-
“1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
1.5.3 Promote urban design that creates attractive and distinctive neighbourhoods
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options
2.1.2 Provide timely and functional public facilities and open spaces to meet changing community needs
2.3 Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other
2.3.1 Provide or facilitate access to services and facilities that support inclusive communities”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Tenderer |
Geographic location |
Price Year 1 01/10/08 – 30/09/09 |
Price year 2 01/10/09 – 30/09/10 |
Gecko |
South |
$249,885. |
$257,205 |
The mean value of the tender to service Streetscape Maintenance South is $253,545 per annum. This can be accommodated within the maintenance budget allocation for each of the two years.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Gecko Contracting for Tender No 08028 for Streetscape Maintenance South, as per the Schedule of Rates and the General Conditions of Tendering for a Period of Two Years from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2010, with an option to extend for a further 12 months or part thereof.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0145
File Name: AA Playspace Name Selection.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Kathy Christoffelsz
Meeting Date: 23 Sept 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the selection of a name for the Children’s Playspace in Rotary Park, Scenic Drive, Wanneroo.
Background
In 2003, Council endorsed the concept of a “Special Needs Playground”, also known as the Accessible and Inclusive Playground (working titles only), to provide a benchmark playspace for accessibility and inclusiveness, with appeal not only for children with a disability but also the general community.
Construction of the playground is now completed, apart from electrical connection by Western Power, which will enable electric components of the playspace (barbecues and lighting) to be used. The facility is now open for public use, an official launch date has been set for 24 October 2008, and marketing and promotion of the facility has commenced. The final product is very noteworthy and the playspace is already proving extremely popular with users.
As part of the project development, The Special Needs Playground Working Group (the Working Group) endorsed at its meeting of 20 May 2008, to hold a naming competition to be held with local schoolchildren to develop a name for the playspace. This competition has now been held, has been considered by the Working Group, and is now presented to Council for consideration.
Detail
In determining an appropriate name for the new playspace, Administration have undertaken the following tasks:
§ researched the historical precedents that had been set through extensive and long-term usage of the park name;
§ development of a marketing plan, official launch date and planning for promotional signage and materials;
§ developed a sponsorship package for business and community; and
§ conducted a naming competition among students of East Wanneroo, Wanneroo and St Anthony’s Schools.
Naming
The Playspace requires a suitable name so that signage and marketing materials can be finalised and so that the community can readily identify, now and into the future, with this unique development.
Following the consultation process undertaken with local school children, a list of proposed names was presented to the Working Group for consideration at its meeting of 2 September 2008.
The Working Group have deliberated and propose that the name “Opportunity Playspace” be recommended for endorsement by Council, noting that there may be some consideration by Council of whether there is a need to further badge the facility as a City initiative e.g. “Wanneroo” Opportunity Playspace.
Marketing
The City will formally launch the Playground on 24th October 2008. The event will host local schools, disability services and agencies, community leaders, potential sponsors and use signage, brochures, website and other promotional material to target potential users.
· Sponsorship packages have been circulated to local businesses and community groups.
· A Community Event to launch the Beach to Bush Festival will be held in the park in November 2008.
· Administration will actively seek recognition of excellence in design and concept through formal and professional associations/awards on behalf of the City.
Consultation
Youth Services staff visited children in three local primary schools and a naming competition was conducted among Year 7 students in St Anthony’s, East Wanneroo and Wanneroo Primary Schools.
The outcome of the naming competition was discussed at the Special Needs Playground Working Group meeting of 2 September 2008, where the group recommended – “that Council endorse the name Opportunity Playspace as the official name of the playspace situated at Rotary Park, on Scenic Drive in Wanneroo”.
Comment
The Playspace will draw visitors from beyond the City’s boundaries and already is quickly developing a reputation as a high quality and unique play facility of which the City can be justifiably proud. It is felt that the name Opportunity Playspace, located in Rotary Park, on Scenic Drive in Wanneroo recognises all individual contributions within the overall Rotary Park Reserve.
Use of the term “playspace” suggests creative and flexible usage of the space rather than the often-used term of “playground”. “Opportunity Playspace” suggests excitement and challenge, which is a theme used consistently through the design of the facility.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The provision of community infrastructure and the naming of such is congruent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021 as follows:
“Social
2.1 Improve choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.
Governance
4.2 Improve community engagement”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Funds of $10,000 have been allocated in the Community Services 2008/09 budget for the immediate costs of the launch, signage and some promotional materials. Further costs should be minor and absorbed within the Community Services operating budget. Ongoing upkeep of the playspace will be absorbed as part of the City’s parks maintenance provision.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Special Needs Playground Working Group Recommendation – 02/09/08
That Council ENDORSES the name “Opportunity Playspace” as the official name for the play facility at Rotary Park, on Scenic Drive Wanneroo.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S22/0012
File Name: CA Annual Appointment Of Bush Fire Control Officers 2008 2009 Bush Fire Season.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Resmie Greer
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the annual appointment of Bush Fire Control Officers and Permit Issuing Officers.
Background
The City’s Chief Bush Fire Control Officer annually submits nominations for Bush Fire Control Officers and Permit Issuing Officers to Council for appointment. These Officers provide a service in controlling bush fires during the fire season and/or issue burning permits during the restricted burning period.
Detail
It is recommended that the officers as listed below be appointed to the following designated positions for the 2008/2009 Bush Fire Season:
Michael Teraci |
Chief Bush Fire Control Officer |
FESA/Ranger Services |
Ian Hammond Darragh Wills Gregory Kent |
Deputy Bush Fire Control Officers
|
Volunteer Fire Brigade Volunteer Fire Brigade Ranger Services |
Michael Armstrong Callum Arnold Eric Ayres Roy Bone Carmen Taylor Darren Cole Paolo DiGirolami Anthony Fisk Anthony McTaggart Roger Mansfield Clayton Medders Alexander Morrison Michael O’Regan Sean Pender Mark Short Clint Walker Steven Winters Mark White Thomas Zimmerman Lorna Gray Kristy Sticken Chantelle Dickerson Lee Calder Peter Williams Jeffrey Hord |
Bush Fire Control Officers
Bush Fire Control Officers
|
Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Ranger Services Fire Support Volunteer Fire Brigade Wanneroo Volunteer Fire Brigade Two Rocks Volunteer Fire Brigade |
Melwyn Vaz Jayson Lindsay Kim Bennetts Resmie Greer Kelly Temperton Helen Jolley |
Permit Issuing Officers |
Yanchep Volunteer Fire Brigade Yanchep Volunteer Fire Brigade Two Rocks Volunteer Fire Brigade Ranger and Safety Services Ranger and Safety Services Ranger and Safety Services |
Consultation
The Chief Bush Fire Control Officer and the Volunteer Bush Fire Brigades have been made aware of the nominations for Fire Control Officers and Permit Issuing Officers and are supportive of these appointments.
Comment
The City’s Chief Bush Fire Control Officer is recommending that Council considers and approves the appointment of the Bush Fire Control Officers and the Permit Issuing Officers for the period 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009.
Permit applicants must make applications in person to a Bush Fire Control Officer or Permit Issuing Officer. The Permit Officers discuss with the permit applicant the specifics of what they want to burn and where, particularly where the burn is in the vicinity of a sensitive or high risk area such as bush reserves or the pine forest.
The Permit Officer, upon issuing the permits, then ensures that the applicant is fully aware of their responsibilities under the Bush Fires Act when conducting the burn, including having water readily available, sufficient people to handle the burn and that they remain on site till the fire is extinguished. The applicant is also advised in regard to notifications that must be made prior to burning including the City, neighbours and FESA. The permit is generally valid for seven days and can only be used on days where the fire danger rating is not very high or extreme.
This personal contact ensures that the need for the burn can be confirmed and that the applicant can conduct it safely and relevant authorities are aware in the event of any accident or emergency. In addition, Rangers will be able to enforce the provisions of the Act where a permit has not been issued or the burn has not been conducted in accordance with permit conditions.
Statutory Compliance
Council is required to formalise these appointments under the Bush Fires Act 1954.
Strategic Implications
2.4 Improve
Community Safety
“2.4.4 Develop and implement a range of activities that promote community
safety and wellbeing.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPOINTS the following officers to the designated positions for the 2008/2009 Bush Fire Season:
Chief Bush Fire Control Officer – Michael Teraci;
Deputy Chief Bush Fire Control Officers – Ian Hammond, Darragh Wills, Gregory Kent;
Bush Fire Control Officers - Michael Armstrong, Callum Arnold, Eric Ayres, Roy Bone, Carmen Taylor, Darren Cole, Paolo DiGirolami, Anthony Fisk, Anthony McTaggart, Roger Mansfield, Clayton Medders, Alexander Morrison, Michael O’Regan, Sean Pender, Mark Short, Clint Walker, Steven Winters, Mark White, Thomas Zimmerman, Lorna Gray, Kristy Sticken, Chantelle Dickerson, Lee Calder, Peter Williams, Jeffrey Hord;
Permit Issuing Officers – Melwyn Vaz, Jayson Lindsay, Kim Bennetts, Resmie Greer, Kelly Temperton, Helen Jolley; and
2. NOTES that Administration will ensure that the appointment of these officers will appear in the local papers.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: SO9/0062V02
File Name: BA Update on PT03 07 08.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: M. O'Regan
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Petition (PT03 07/08) – Installation of a Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) camera in Observatory Drive, Clarkson, as presented at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 29 July 2008 .
Background
Council has received a nine signatory petition from residents of Observatory Drive and Cactus Link in Clarkson requesting the installation of a CCTV camera on the footpath next to 67 Observatory Drive Clarkson.
A covering letter from a resident of Observatory Drive Clarkson was attached to the petition highlighting their personal, and local resident concerns regarding antisocial problems and vandalism along the public access way (PaW) near their property.
Detail
Petition PT03-07/08 comprises of 9 signatures and seeks:
“The installation of CCTV camera, (adjacent to the) footpath next to 7 Observatory Drive, Clarkson”.
It should be noted that the location of concern has been subsequently identified as the PaW adjacent to 67 Observatory Drive, Clarkson.
Council Officers recently met with representatives from the WA Police (the Police) at one of the regular bi-monthly Police/Ranger meetings, where the concerns expressed in the petition were discussed.
The Police have advised that they were aware of anti social activity around the PaW. The Officer in Charge of the Clarkson Police Station has arranged for his staff to continue patrolling this area over the next few months.
Upon receipt of the petition, a Ranger was sent to the residence of the concerned resident to discuss their concerns. The resident has been support by the activation of regular Ranger patrols in the area.
Ranger and Safety Services also met with the North West Crime Prevention Unit and an appointment was made to interview and inspect the resident’s property to identify any potential risks or security improvements that may relieve some of the anxiety being experienced.
The resident was provided with written information on home security and contact numbers should they require them in future. The resident was also concerned about illegal vehicle access to the PaW as a result of a large pine tree having been vandalised and removed, leaving a gap wide enough for vehicle access. Administration has since arranged for bollards to be placed to prevent any further vehicle access to this location.
Following a complete inspection of the area by Police and Safety Services staff in the context of the original petition and the concerns raised, the resident was advised that a CCTV camera in the laneway was not going to necessarily resolve this particular issue. The resident was advised that a coordinated approach by them and neighbours, Police, Rangers and Homeswest was the most appropriate method of resolving their concerns. The resident was very appreciative of the assistance provided and advised that they “felt better knowing that something was going to be done”.
The Police and Rangers have also met with the other signatories to the Petition who were experiencing similar concerns and they were also advised of the Police and Rangers proposed approach on this issue. They were appreciative of the action taken to date and were also willing to form a Neighbourhood Watch group in the area. The Police have since facilitated this initiative and the City has assisted by installing Neighbourhood Watch signs in the area. The Police and the City have since been in ongoing contact with the primary concerned resident, who has also joined the Neighbourhood Watch group.
Consultation
All nine signatories have been consulted on this matter and have since formed a Neighbourhood Watch group to assist one another in the future.
Comment
The Police and Rangers will continue to monitor the area over the next few months and liaise further with stakeholders (including Homeswest) if any further complaints of antisocial behaviour are received.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Community Engagement in dealing with issues of community safety and antisocial behaviours is congruent with the City’s strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“Social – Healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities
2.3 Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other;
2.4 Improve community safety.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT install Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) in the Public Access Way at Observatory Rise Clarkson;
2. NOTES the response from Administration regarding Petition (PT03 07/08) received by Council on 29 July 2008; and
2. ADVISES Administration to advise petitioners of the decision of Council on this matter.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057V03
File Name: AA People Against Vandalism Donation Request.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Garry Prus
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a request from the crime mitigation group, People Against Vandalism (PAV) for a donation of $30,000.00 towards ongoing graffiti removal and associated crime reduction strategies in the City of Wanneroo.
Background
PAV is a not for profit organisation providing graffiti removal and associated services aimed at reducing anti-social behaviours in the community.
At the Ordinary Council meeting of 7 August 2007, Council resolved to:
“AGREE to support the volunteer initiative People Against Vandalism in removing graffiti from the City’s coastal suburbs in the form of:
1. $20,000 contribution to paint and chemicals to be allocated from existing operating budgets;
2. Assistance in seeking and retaining volunteers;
3. Assistance in preparation of a joint submission to the State Government for further funding; and
4. Preparation of joint media promotions regarding People Against Vandalism’s Graffiti Busters Brigade.”
Since that time PAV have been providing a comprehensive graffiti clean up service in the suburbs of Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Clarkson, Merriwa and Butler, as part of this Arrangement.
Administration has received a proposal from PAV seeking continued support from the City to continue to provide these services and to partner in ongoing community education and crime reduction initiatives. More specifically they are seeking a donation of $30,000.00 towards the operational costs associated with the continued delivery of their graffiti clean up services within the City for the 2008/09 financial year.
Detail
Over the past twelve months PAV have been actively providing graffiti removal services throughout the suburbs of Mindarie, Quinns Rocks, Clarkson, Merriwa and Butler.
They have been very proactive in establishing dialogues with the State Government and other stakeholders and have also undertaken the development of a comprehensive Business Plan for the period July 2007 to June 2010 (a copy of this document has been provided in the Councillors Reading Room for further information).
PAV readily acknowledges that the current reactive program of graffiti removal is only one part of broader suite of services needed to combat the continuing incidence of graffiti damage in our communities. They seek to grow their influence and actions in the areas of youth and community education and engagement, and also to grow the volunteer support for their community based initiatives.
During the 2007/08 financial year, the City complimented its own graffiti removal efforts by providing PAV with access to chemicals and paint products to the value of $28,000.
PAV have also been the recipients of two small Community Funding Grants to the value of $7,000.00 (made up from an October 2006 allocation of $5,000.00 and a subsequent March 2007 allocation of $2,000.00). These funds were used to augment their funding for graffiti removal in the City.
The current donation request presented for consideration seeks a direct contribution from Council to the value of $30,000.00 as opposed to the provision of chemicals and paint supplies. The rationale being that a straight donation to PAV will provide them with the flexibility to better manage their operations and the cash flow requirements associated with the acquisition of vital supplies and consumables. PAV have stated that operational and funding flexibility enhances their service delivery outcomes by allowing for bulk purchases and the acquisition of preferred chemicals that deliver more cost effective and efficient removal services.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The figures below indicate the level of graffiti reported and the costs to the City attributed to graffiti clean up over the last four financial years. The figures, however, don’t include the instances of graffiti where clean up occurs without reporting to the central register. This has occurred both with PAV clean up crews and the City’s contractors where they have been tasked to “seek and destroy”, that is, clean up graffiti without waiting for formal reports.
|
2007/08 |
2006/2007 |
2005/2006 |
2004/2005 |
Reports |
5,151 |
5488 |
4964 |
2501 |
Costs |
$278,146 |
$220,855 |
$491,444 |
$368,147 |
It is considered that the association with PAV provides significant community and cost benefits to the City and its residents. This partnership provides opportunities for community engagement and supportive actions and creates public awareness towards the issues of graffiti removal.
Reports from PAV indicate that over the last twelve months July 2007 to June 2008, they were responsible for attending 925 call outs to remove 11,462 square metres of graffiti, which equates to a conservative estimated saving to the City of $50,000.
Administration is supportive of this initiative, which involves local community members actively participating in the clean up of graffiti and taking ownership of local community spaces. Administration is also keen to pursue partnering opportunities with PAV for community and youth initiatives that acknowledges and promotes that these issues require a whole of community response.
Conversation with representatives have confirmed that should the City favourably consider this donation request, the group would adhere to acquittal and reporting requirements as determined by administration.
Statutory Compliance
Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that approval of Council by Absolute Majority is granted to authorise unbudgeted/endorsed expenditure.
Strategic Implications
“Social – Healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities
2.3 Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other
2.4 Improve community safety.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
No specific funding allocation has been made in the 2008/09 Operating Budget for providing $30,000 donation to PAV. However, this funding can be made available from the 2008/09 Infrastructure Maintenance (Building, Parks and Engineering Maintenance) Operating Budget (Contract Labour and Material Expenses Accounts). A budget variation is therefore necessary as per following detail:
Cost Code |
From |
To |
Description |
728433-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Parks Maintenance |
728434-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Engineering Maintenance |
728432-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Building Maintenance |
728431-3231-316 |
|
$30,000 |
Donation, Graffiti Removal – Infrastructure Maintenance |
These accounts provide funding for contract services and materials associated with a range of maintenance activities including graffiti removal.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 APPROVES by Absolute Majority unbudgeted expenditure of $30,000.00 for a donation to People Against Vandalism for the removal of graffiti within the City of Wanneroo;
2. NOTES the following budget variations to reflect the transfer of funds from Infrastructure Maintenance (Contract Labour and Materials Accounts) to Donation Account – Graffiti Removal Infrastructure Maintenance to accommodate the above; and
Cost Code |
From |
To |
Description |
728433-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Parks Maintenance |
728434-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Engineering Maintenance |
728432-9399-229 |
$10,000 |
|
Contract Labour and Material Expenses – Building Maintenance |
728431-3231-316 |
|
$30,000 |
Donation Account – Graffiti Removal Infrastructure Maintenance |
3. NOTES that a further report will be provided to Council acquitting the donation and detailing the outcomes from the above donation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0249V01
Responsible Officer: Director Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Nicky Barker
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the repeal of the Standing Orders Local Law
2000 and it’s subsequent amendments and the
adoption of new Standing Orders Local Law 2008 as part of the 8 Eight Year
Local Law Review process.
The purpose of the Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is to repeal the current Standing Orders Local Law 2000 as a result of the Eight Year Local Law review process, as well as to give effect to new legislation in relation to the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007.
The effect of the adoption of the new Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is to permit better management and implementation of Council’s decision making process.
The purpose of the Standing
Orders Local Law 2008 is to repeal the current Standing Orders Local Law 2000
as a result of the 8 Year Local Law review process as well as to give effect to
new legislation in relation to the Local Government (Rules of Conduct)
Regulations 2007.
The effect of the adoption of
the new Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is to permit better management and
implementation of Council’s decision-making process.
Background
The Local Government Act 1995 (the Act), requires that Council must, every eight years after adoption or review of any local law, conduct a review of the local law to ensure that it still retains currency.
Further justification to for a review
of the
Standing Orders Local Law is due provided by to the
implementation
introduction of
new legislation governing the conduct of council members. It is important to ensure that the City’s local laws adhere to new and current legislation, are relevant, do not contradict other local laws and are not contrary to the City’s policies, strategic direction or other plans and processes.
Detail
There are two distinct processes to follow in undertaking
an 8 Eight Year
Local Law Review - the first being a review under Section 3.16 of the Act,
and the second being the implementation of the
outcome of the review under Section 3.12 of the Act. The City’s solicitors, in
consultation with other relevant stakeholders, have reviewed the Standing
Orders Local Law under Section 3.16 of the Act as a separate process to that of
the 8
Eight Year Local Law Review due to its
significance to elected members. It was, however, still included in the state-wide
advertising for community input to ensure that the process was fully
compliant.
Section 3.12 of the Act requiresstates as
follows:-
“3.12 Procedure for making local laws
(1) In making a local law a local government is to follow the procedure described in this section, in the sequence in which it is described.
(2) At a council meeting the person presiding is to give notice to the meeting of the purpose and effect of the proposed local law in the prescribed manner.
(3) The local government is to:-
(a) give Statewide public notice stating that:
(i) the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice;
(ii) a copy of the proposed local law may be inspected or obtained at any place specified in the notice; and
(iii) submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given;
(b) as soon as the notice is given, give a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister; and
(c) provide a copy of the proposed local law, in accordance with the notice, to any person requesting it.
(3a) A notice under subsection (3) is also to be published and exhibited as if it were a local public notice.
(4) After the last day for submissions, the local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from what was proposed.
* Absolute majority required.
(5) After making the local law, the local government is to publish it in the Gazette and give a copy of it to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister.
(6) After the local law has been published in the Gazette the local government is to give local public notice:-
(a) stating the title of the local law;
(b) summarizing the purpose and effect of the local law (specifying the day on which it comes into operation); and
(c) advising that copies of the local law may be inspected or obtained from the local government’s office.
(7) The Minister may give directions to local governments requiring them to provide to the Parliament copies of local laws they have made and any explanatory or other material relating to them.
(8) In this section “making” in relation to a local law, includes making a local law to amend the text of, or repeal, a local law.”
Consultation
The City engaged the services of Woodhouse Legal Solicitors
&
& Consultants to workshop the City’s
Standing Orders Local Law with elected members at the Council Forum meeting held
on 14 August 2007. Information provided to elected members prior to the 14
August 2007 Councilthis Forum meeting highlighted
the various
issues that
needed to be consideredfor consideration,
and members were requested to provide their comments to Council Administration.
The first phase of public advertising as required by the Act was then
undertaken in late 2007, with the submission period closing in December
2007. No submissions were received.
A further workshop was held with elected members on 19 February 2008, where the City’s Solicitors provided members with additional clarification, specifically in terms of the “Dealing with Proponents” clause included in the Standing Orders Local Law. As a result of this workshop the draft Standing Orders Local Law was modified.
After an in depth consultation and submission process, the Council
at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 11 March 2008, Council resolved
to proceed with the repeal under Section 3.12 of the Act as follows:-
“That Council:
1. ADOPT BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the review of the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law under Section 3.16 of the Local Government Act 1995 and the repeal and replacement as detailed below; and
2. COMMENCE the process under Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 to repeal and replace the City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law.”
As a result of the above resolution the Standing Orders
Local Law 2008 was subsequently advertised for public
comment., with The close
of the 42 day submission period was closing on 18
July 2008. At the close of submissions, the following responses had
been
received:
· A petition of 33 signatories;
· A petition of 385 signatories;
· Fourteen (14) letters of the same content; and
· A letter from Mrs A Hine.
Two further submissions were received after the closing date, as follows:
· A petition of 51 signatories (received 23 July 2008); and
· A petition of 26 signatories (received 29 July 2008).
At the close of submissions a petition of 33
signatories was received “asking that Council instruct Administration to
ensure Elected Councillors keep their Question Time Without Notice as we
believe this is essential to ensure the required effect of the local law in
regard to more open and accountable local government.
We believe it is the democratic right of our
elected councillors to be able to ask questions without notice in order to help
them ensure more open and accountable local government by the City of
Wanneroo.”
A further 14 letters were received which state:-
“…….. better decision making by Council; orderly
and efficient conduct of meetings dealing with business of the Council; greater
community participation and understanding of the business of Council; an open
and more accountable local government I want Elected Councillors to keep their
Question Time Without Notice as I believe this is essential to ensure the
required effect of the local law is achieved.
I believe the democratic right of our elected
councillors to be able to ask questions without notice is an important right
that will help to ensure more open and accountable local government.”
In summary, the submissions request that Elected Members’ Question Time be retained. Petitioners feel that it is the democratic right of elected members to be able to ask questions without notice in order to help them ensure more open and accountable local government, better decision making by Council and the orderly and efficient conduct of meetings. Submissions indicate that any action which prevents elected members from exercising the same rights as a ratepayer to ask questions in a public forum interferes with their ability to fully represent the interests of the public, and as such amounts to a breach of the Local Government Act 1995.
In accordance with s3.12(3)(b) of the Act, the proposed local law was also referred to the Minister for Local Government. A response was received from the Department of Local Government and Regional Development (the Department) on 14 August 2008, and these comments were subsequently referred to Woodhouse Legal for consideration. As a result, and following a further review of the document by Administration, the following amendments have been made to the draft local law:
1. The heading on page 1, and at the top of Part 1, has been amended.
2. A preamble has been included.
3. All references throughout the document to ‘Government Gazette” have been italicised.
4. All footnotes have been removed from the draft local law for the purposes of adoption and gazettal. In relation to this issue, the Department advised as follows:
“Please be informed that the Parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (JSCDL) has indicated its concern in relation to the quoting of texts of legislation in footnotes. The JSCDL is concerned that this practice can lead to confusion and persons being misled as to their obligations/rights in the event that the relevant legislation is amended…
It is therefore highly recommended that all such footnotes be deleted from this local law and that should the City wish to quote parts of the legislation, that this be done in an ‘administration only’ version of the local law to assist the public. This administration version would be available from the City’s office, but would not be the official gazetted version of the local law.”
Woodhouse Legal have accordingly provided two versions of the draft local law, one without footnotes for adoption and gazettal which forms part of the recommendation to this report, and one including footnotes for administration reference.
5. The words ‘of the Act’ have been added to clause 3.7 following the reference to section 5.60.
6. The reference in clause 3.13(5) to subclause (5) has been changed to subclause (4).
7. The reference in clause 6.1(8) to subclause (6) of clause 3.13 has been deleted.
8. The reference in clause 6.1(9) to subclauses (7), (8) and (9) of clause 3.13 has been changed to subclauses (6), (7), (8) and (9).
9. An additional permissible procedural motion has been included in clause 7.1, as follows:
“(f) that the limitation on members speaking be suspended or that the limitation be resumed;”.
The previous 7.1(f) has been renumbered as 7.1(g).
10. Clause 7.9(6) has been deleted. In relation to this issue, the Department advised as follows:
“For clause 7.9(6), please be informed that the JSCDL has indicated that it is of the view that this clause may impose confidentiality obligations for council members in excess of the new Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007… The JSCDL has stated that such a clause may be in conflict with the Act and Regulations in its total prohibition on the disclosure of information discussed at a council meeting regardless of the local government’s decision that information can be disclosed.
It is therefore recommended that this clause be removed.”
Woodhouse Legal have confirmed that a member’s obligations with respect to confidentiality are set out in Regulation 10 of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007, whilst officers and employees are bound by the confidentiality provisions of the Act.
The existing clause 7.9(7) has been renumbered as clause 7.9(6).
11. A new clause 7.10 has been included, as follows:
“7.10 Limitation on members speaking be suspended or be resumed – effect of motion
(1) If a motion “that the limitation on members speaking be suspended” is carried then the operation of clause 5.8 is suspended.
(2) If a motion “that the limitation on members speaking be resumed” is carried then the operation of clause 5.8 is no longer suspended.”
The existing clause 7.10 has been renumbered as clause 7.11.
12. Clauses 8.2(2) and 8.3(1) have been amended so as not to duplicate or be in conflict with regulation 10(3) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007.
Comment
From the submissions received there appears to be some
support for the retention of Elected Members’ Question tTime.
Mostly
Tthe principal grounds
for objection to the removal of Councillor’s Elected Members’ Question
Time, as ascertained from the submissions received, weisre:-
· Reduced accountability of Administration to the Elected Members and so to the community at large; and
·
Contrary to the intent of the Local Government Act 1995 as
it removes the democratic right of an elected Elected memberMember.
It is noted that a Strategic Review undertaken some time
ago by the City of Wanneroo, assisted by
the Department of Local Government and Regional Development, some time
ago suggested that Council in the interests of best practise, should adopt
the format of the Department’s Guidelines on ‘The Preparation of
Agendas and Minutes - A Guide for Western Australian Local Government” for its
Council meetings.
Specifically, contained in the
report provided by the Strategic Review Panel (which included representation
from the Department of Local Government and Regional Development),
the following comment was made in relation to Councillor Elected
Members’ Question Time:
“Councillor Question Time – this should be removed from the agenda. All elected members can obtain information regarding issues and queries raised by ratepayers at other times rather than in ordinary meetings of council. It is a waste of time for all involved. It is an opportunity for “grandstanding” by elected members for no benefit except their own egos. It is also an opportunity to embarrass staff members who may not have enough details in front of them to answer a question.”
It is also noted that the ability of Elected Members to raise issues with Administration to ensure open and accountable local government is provided in a variety of ways, including:
· The Executive Management Team and Managers are available to take calls from Elected Members and endeavour at all times to provide sufficient information to assist in their role as a Councillor;
· Administration provides an integrated software system for processing all Councillor Enquiries;
· Briefing Sessions held a week prior to Council meetings are specifically convened to allow Elected Members to ask questions and clarify queries relating to draft reports. Briefing sessions are also open to the public; and
·
The Chief Executive Officer and Directors are available to meet
with Elected Members prior to each Council Briefing Session each week.
Furthermore research has indicated that not many
local governments have made provision for Elected Members Question time in
their Standing Orders due to the existence of other opportunities to obtain
information from Administration to effectively undertake their role as an
Elected Member.
The general advice received from the Department of Local
Government and Regional Development in regard to Elected Members’ Qquestion
tTime
is to
acknowledges that although Elected
Members are also members of the public but should be encouraged to
use other opportunitiesthey do have many other
avenues open to them to obtain information relative to their
decision making function, including those listed above. These avenues are not
necessarily available to the general public, hence the support for Public
Question Time, as opposed to Elected Members’ Question Time, at Council
meetings. and that question time is provided for members of
the public who do not have these opportunities available to them.
For the reasons stated above, few local governments now include Elected Members’ Question Time in their Standing Orders.
The Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is therefore presented
to Council exclusive of Elected Members’ Question Time for
Elected Members. Alternatively shouldIn the
event that Council wishes to include the this provision,
consideration should be given to requesting that questions be provided in
writing “with notice” to enable Administration to provide a researched and
effective response to the Elected Member in the interest of effective, open and
accountable local government.
In addition, the Standing Orders Local Law 2008 currently includes clause 8.4(2), which states “A member must not sit in the public gallery during a meeting.”.
It is the Department’s view that this clause could be held to be invalid, as it is imposing restrictions on Elected Members where, in some circumstances, they could have the rights of the public to attend meetings. The Department therefore recommends that this clause be deleted. However, the City’s legal adviser does not consider that where a member sits during a meeting is inconsistent with the right to attend the meeting, and therefore does not recommend deletion of the clause unless Council has a strong view to the contrary.
The Standing Orders Local Law 2008 is therefore presented inclusive of clause 8.4(2).
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.16 of the Act requires the Council to
carry out a formal review of its Local Laws every 8 eight years.
Following the review of the Local Laws any amendments will be processed in accordance with Section 3.12 of the Act.
Strategic Implications
The review procedure supports the City’s Strategic Plan No. 4, Objective 4.7:-
“Governance: Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The legal costs associated with the review and repeal of the Standing Orders Local Law.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTE the submissions received by the close of the submission period on 18 July 2008;
2. NOTE the submissions received on 23 July 2008 and 29 July 2008, following the close of the submission period on 18 July 2008;
3. NOTE the amendments made to the Standing Orders Local Law 2008; and
4. ADOPT BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Standing Orders Local Law 2008, as detailed below:-
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0249V01
Responsible Officer: Director Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Lee-Anne Burt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To give notice under section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) of the intention by the City of Wanneroo to adopt amendments to a number of local laws as a result of the recent Eight Year Local Law Review.
Background
Under the Act, every eight years Council is required to undertake a comprehensive review of its local laws. Accordingly, at its meeting on 9 October 2007, Council resolved to proceed with a review of the following local laws:
· Animals Local Law 1999;
· Bushfire Brigades Local Law 2001;
· Extractive Industries Local Law 1998;
· Health Local Law 1999;
· Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999;
· Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law 2003;
· Private Property Local Law 2001;
· Signs Local Law 1999;
· Standing Orders Local Law 2000; and
· Trading in Public Places Local Law 1999.
Council also resolved to advertise the review in accordance with section 3.16(2) of the Act.
It should be noted that the Standing Orders Local Law 2000 has been dealt with outside the process relating to the review of the other local laws. As a consequence, a new Standing Orders Local Law has been developed and progressed separately under section 3.12 of the Act. A separate report dealing with the Standing Orders Local Law will be presented to Council at its meeting on 23 September 2008.
BHW Consultants were engaged to progress the local law review, which was advertised on 24 October 2007, with submissions closing on 7 December 2007. No submissions had been received at the close of the submission period, however an email submission was received from the Wanneroo Business Association (WBA) on 4 February 2008.
Council employees were also invited to have input into the review, resulting in a number of suggestions with respect to possible changes to Council’s local laws.
In adopting the resulting Eight Year Local Law Review Report at its meeting on 11 March 2008, Council resolved as follows:
“That Council
1. NOTE that no community submissions were received by the close of the submission period on 7 December 2007 following advertising of the review of the following local laws:
· Animals Local Law 1999;
· Bushfire Brigades Local Law 2001;
· Extractive Industries Local Law 1998;
· Health Local Law 1999;
· Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999;
· Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law 2003;
· Private Property Local Law 2001;
· Signs Local Law 1999;
· Standing Orders Local Law 2000; and
· Trading in Public Places Local Law 1999.
2. NOTE that a late submission was received from the Wanneroo Business Association by email on 4 February 2008.
3. NOTE that as the comments from the Wanneroo Business Association did not identify specific amendments to the City of Wanneroo Local Laws further consideration will be given to their comments during the development of amendments to the respective Local Laws.
4. ADOPT BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Review Report detailing the proposed changes to the Local Laws as presented at Attachment 2.
5. DETERMINE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to commence the process under Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 of amending or repealing the Local Laws as laid out in the Review Report.”
In accordance with Part 5 of Council’s resolution, BHW Consultants then proceeded to formulate amendments to each of the City’s Local Laws, with the exception of the Standing Orders Local Law which has been progressed separately.
The process of compiling the Amendment Local Laws has involved extensive consultation over several months with relevant officers within the City’s Administration, who have provided a significant amount of input with respect to the proposed amendments. Where necessary, suggested amendments have also been referred to the City’s legal advisor, Woodhouse Legal, for comment.
BHW Consultants gave a presentation in relation to the draft Amendment Local Laws at the Council Forum held on 9 September 2008. As a result of discussions during the Forum, a further subclause has been added to the Local Government and Public Property Amendment Local Law prohibiting the use of model powered vehicles (see Attachment 1).
Detail
A separate amendment local law (Attachment 1) has been developed for each of the nine City of Wanneroo local laws subject to review, and broad details of the amendments proposed are listed below. Copies of the existing primary Local Laws are available in the Elected Members’ Reading Room for reference.
Within each of the proposed amendments there are changes to the legislative description, standards and consequential changes throughout the documents. The significant changes that are proposed within the amendment to each of the local laws are outlined as follows:
1. Animals Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Substitute “environmental health officer” with “authorised officer”;
· Standardise fencing requirements for keeping of dogs across the whole City;
· Reduce the distance for the keeping of pigeons on the property where the cage is located;
· Delete clause 53, being the “Limit on Liability” clause, which has been the subject of concern from the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (Joint Standing Committee); and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the First Schedule in relation to dogs to introduce a penalty for dangerous dogs.
2. Bush Fire Brigades Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Insert a new First Schedule providing a Bush Fire Brigade Constitution, being the rules that govern the operation of bush fire brigades. This is required to form a part of the local law by the Joint Standing Committee;
· Delete clause 2.5, which allowed the City to vary the Constitution without the need to amend the local law. The Joint Standing Committee requires any amendments to the Constitution to be processed as an amendment to the local law; and
· Make consequential amendments to the local law to reflect the introduction of the Bush Fire Brigade Constitution.
3. Extractive Industries Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Change the reference from “Shire” to “City” throughout the local law;
· Amend to add new requirements for information to be provided when making an application for an Extractive Industry; and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the First Schedule.
4. Health Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Insert a new definition for “CEO” and “eating house”;
· Delete the definitions for “restaurant” and “take-away”;
· Insert new requirements for application, registration and licensing of an eating house;
· Insert new definitions relating to “liquid refuse” and “liquid waste”;
· Amend the current definition of “refuse disposal site” to allow for refuse to be disposed of at a site(s) other than Tamala Park Refuse Disposal Site;
· Insert new requirements for depositing and disposal of liquid refuse and liquid waste;
· Insert new requirements relating to the management of offensive trades; and
· Insert 17 new Schedules covering forms associated with eating house licensing, lodging house registration and offensive trade.
5. Local Government and Public Property Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Insert in clause 25 prohibiting the flying of a model aircraft and using a model power boat in City reserves;
· Insert in clause 48 the prohibition of the use of gravel, crushed brick or loose stone in a verge treatment;
· Amend clause 53 to require the installation of a verge crossing treatment in lieu of it being optional;
· Delete clause 65 being the “Limit on Liability” clause, which has been the subject of concern from the Joint Standing Committee; and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the First Schedule. This includes introducing new penalties for changes that have been proposed in the Amendment Local Law.
During the course of developing the Local Government and Public Property Amendment Local Law 2008, it was proposed to amend the local law by including a definition of “beach” and “sand dune”. The City’s legal advisor subsequently provided the following comments with respect to this proposal:
“The Local Law is clear that it applies ‘throughout the district and in the sea adjoining the district for a distance of 200 metres seaward from the low water mark…’. (See clause 5.) It follows, in my view, that where a provision of the local law refers to a ‘beach’ or a ‘sand dune’, it is referring to a beach or a sand dune within the district. Whether or not the land on which an offence is alleged to have occurred can be said to be a ‘beach’ or a ‘sand dune’ would normally be proved by the oral testimony of the City’s witness.”
As a result of this advice and discussions between the City’s Ranger Services and the City’s legal advisor, it has been determined that the proposed definitions are not required.
6. Parking and Parking Facilities Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Replace all the definitions in clause 3 of the local law. It was felt that, due to the number of changes required to this clause, it would be preferable to repeal the clause entirely and replace with a new set of definitions;
· Amend the First Schedule to clarify the parking control that the City has over main roads; and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the Second Schedule.
7. Private Property Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Substitute the definition for the term “state of disrepair” to ensure that it incorporates not only a vehicle that is not licensed but one that cannot be used on the road by virtue of its condition;
· Amend clause 7.1 to correct the maximum illumination from 1 lux to 10 lux. The angle at which the light can spill has also been amended from 70 degrees from the vertical plane to 20 degrees to vertically downward;
· Amend clause 8.1 to require approval for use of “barbed wire” in fencing;
· Insert a new clause 16.1 to enable the City to set the fees and charges applicable to matters under the local law by resolution. The local law has been consequently amended to delete the current schedule of fees and charges;
· Amend the Third Schedule to include the opportunity for the City to approve alternative fences for front fences on a rural and special rural lot; and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the Fifth Schedule.
8. Signs Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Amend clause 15 to increase the size of signs that are exempt from licensing requirements to ensure consistency with the City’s Signage Strategy (adopted by Council at its meeting on 23 November 2004); and
· Delete clause 36, being the “Limit on Liability” clause, which has been the subject of concern from the Joint Standing Committee.
During the course of developing the Signs Amendment Local Law 2008, it was proposed to amend the local law by making it an offence to erect, maintain or display a sign, the content of which has been declared “objectionable” by the City. There was a concern that it would be very difficult to readily determine objectively whether a sign was one that the City would find “objectionable”, as this requires a subjective judgement on the part of the person required to make that decision.
After legal advice, therefore, this proposal was not included in the proposed amendment.
9. Trading in Public Places Amendment Local Law 2008
The amendment for this local law includes the following:
· Replace the definitions for the terms “eating house” and “public place”;
· Amend clause 39 to allow for greater flexibility in the number of people involved in street entertainment, but at the same time maintaining a level of control over such activities;
· Delete clause 46, being the “Limit on Liability” clause, which has been the subject of concern from the Joint Standing Committee;
· Amend the wording in clause 48 with respect to public liability insurance, as the previous wording is considered unenforceable; and
· Amend the modified penalties included in the First Schedule.
Comment
The Purpose and Effect of each of the proposed amendment local laws is as follows:
1. Animals Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to make minor changes to the operation of the Animals Local Law 1999, to remove the provision placing a limit on the City’s liability, and to review the modified penalties in respect to dogs and dangerous dogs.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to enhance the controls over animals generally within the City of Wanneroo.
2. Bush Fire Brigades Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to amend the Bush Fire Brigades Local Law 2001 to remove the provision allowing the Council to amend the Rules Governing the Operation of Bush Fire Brigades as incorporated in the Bush Fire Brigade Local Law, without the due process required in amending a local law, and to insert a new Bush Fire Brigade Constitution.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that the community has the opportunity to comment on proposed changes to the Rules Governing the Operation of Bush Fire Brigades before they are introduced.
3. Extractive Industries Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to change the reference throughout the local law from “Shire” to “City”, to require additional information to be provided to support the application for an extractive industry, and to review the modified penalties.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that extractive industries operating in the City of Wanneroo are licensed and their operations regulated.
4. Health Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to align the existing Health Local Law with current public health requirements, insert new requirements with respect to depositing and disposal of liquid waste and liquid refuse, insert new requirements relating to the management of offensive trades, and insert 17 new Schedules covering forms associated with eating house licensing, lodging house registration and offensive trade.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to enable public health in the community to be adequately protected by current statutory mechanisms.
5. Local Government and Public Property Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to prohibit certain activities on reserves, prohibit the use of certain materials as a verge treatment, require all properties to have a properly constructed verge crossing treatment, remove the provision placing a limit on the City’s liability and review the modified penalties.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to control the use of local government property and create offences for inappropriate behaviour in or on local government property.
6. Parking and Parking Facilities Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to adopt new definitions to reflect those used in the Road Traffic Code 2000, clarify the control of parking on main roads and review the modified penalties.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that parking is effectively managed within the City of Wanneroo.
7. Private Property Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to provide new definitions, clarify the maximum illumination permitted, require approval for the installation of barbed wire, allow the City to set the fees and charges by resolution, allow alternative fences to be approved on rural and special rural lots and review the modified penalties.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that the use of private property does not impact inappropriately on the community.
8. Signs Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to amend the size of certain signs that are classified as exempt from a license and remove the provision placing a limit on the City’s liability.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that the licensing requirements are more appropriate to community needs.
9. Trading in Public Places Amendment Local Law 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this amendment is to amend some definitions, insert a new definition for “alfresco dining”, give greater flexibility for street entertainment activities, remove the provision placing a limit on the City’s liability, amend the wording for public liability insurance requirements for licensees and review the modified penalties.
Effect
The effect of this amendment is to ensure that licensing requirements are more appropriate to community needs.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 3 – Functions of local governments
Division 2 – Legislative functions of local governments
Subdivision 2 – Local laws made under any Act
s3.12 – Procedure for making local laws
“(1) In making a local law a local government is to follow the procedure described in this section, in the sequence in which it is described.
(2) At a council meeting the person presiding is to give notice to the meeting of the purpose and effect of the proposed local law in the prescribed manner.
(3) The local government is to –
(a) give Statewide public notice stating that –
(i) the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice;
(ii) a copy of the proposed local law may be inspected or obtained at any place specified in the notice; and
(iii) submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given;
(b) as soon as the notice is given, give a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister; and
(c) provide a copy of the proposed local law, in accordance with the notice, to any person requesting it.
(3a) A notice under subsection (3) is also to be published and exhibited as if it were a local public notice.
(4) After the last day for submissions, the local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local Law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from what was proposed.
*Absolute majority required.
(5) After making the local law, the local government is to publish it in the Gazette and give a copy of it to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister.
(6) After the local law has been published in the Gazette the local government is to give local public notice –
(a) stating the title of the local law;
(b) summarizing the purpose and effect of the local law (specifying the day on which it comes into operation); and
(c) advising that copies of the local law may be inspected or obtained from the local government’s office.
(7) The Minister may give directions to local governments requiring them to provide to the Parliament copies of local laws they have made and any explanatory or other material relating to them.
(8) In this section –
“making” in relation to a local law, includes making a local law to amend the text of, or repeal, a local law.”
Strategic Implications
City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021
Objective 4.7
“Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Strategy 4.7.2
“Ensure compliance with relevant statutory authorities.”
Policy Implications
As a result of the proposed amendments, it may be necessary to review and amend certain Council policies.
Financial Implications
Costs associated with seeking legal advice on a number of amendments are likely. Costs will also be incurred with respect to the advertising and eventual publication in the Government Gazette of the amendment local laws.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council, in accordance with section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995:-
1. APPROVE the giving of Statewide public notice of the following amendment local laws:
· Animals Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Bushfire Brigades Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Extractive Industries Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Health Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Local Government and Public Property Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Parking and Parking Facilities Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Private Property Amendment Local Law 2008;
· Signs Amendment Local Law 2008; and
· Trading in Public Places Amendment Local Law 2008.
2. SUBMIT to the Minister for Local Government a copy of all the amendment local laws;
3. SUBMIT to the Minister for Emergency Services a copy of the Bushfire Brigades Amendment Local Law 2008; and
4. SUBMIT to the Minister for Health a copy of the Health Amendment Local Law 2008 and Trading in Public Places Amendment Local Law 2008.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0217V01
File Name: AA Amendment of Recording and Access to Tape Recordings of Council Meetings Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont
Responsible Officer: Director Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Lee-Anne Burt
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the amendment of the Recording and Access to Tape Recordings of Council Meetings Policy, to allow for the provision of recordings to elected members.
Background
The current Policy provisions with respect to access to meeting recordings are as follows:
“Access to Recorded Tapes
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of the taped proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing taped proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the tape plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may listen to a recording of the Council proceedings upon request at no charge however no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer.”
A Motion on Notice with respect to this matter was presented by Cr Blencowe to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 29 July 2008, at which time Council resolved to refer the matter back for discussion at a Council Forum.
A report was subsequently presented to the Council Forum on 12 August 2008. Following discussion, it was agreed that the Policy would be reviewed and reworded, and submitted back to Council for further consideration.
Detail
Based on the outcome of Council’s Forum discussions, the Recording and Access to Tape Recordings of Council Meetings Policy has been amended with a view to achieving the following aims:
1. To allow for the provision of copies of recorded meetings to elected members upon request.
2. To take into account recent upgrades to the recording facilities in Council Chambers, which have superseded the use of cassette tapes.
Comment
Under s5.92 of the Local Government Act 1995, elected members are entitled to access information held by the local government that is relevant to the performance of their role.
In its current format, the Policy does allow elected members to access recordings; however, if they wish to do so they are required to listen to the recording at the Civic Centre. The original Notice of Motion submitted by Cr Blencowe put forward the position that this requirement not only placed an unnecessary burden on the time of elected members, but also may occasion unnecessary expense. The provision of copies of recordings via CD, however, is now a simple and economical process that would allow elected members to more easily carry out their role and fulfil their obligations to the community.
It should be noted that the current technology does not allow for the copying of selected sections of a recording. If an elected member or member of the public requests a copy of a recording, then they will be provided with the recording of the whole meeting. Therefore, the provision of transcripts for selected sections of meetings remains the preferred option for elected members.
In addition, the revised Policy highlights that reproductions of recorded Council proceedings may be used for the purpose of Council business only.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 7 – Access to Information
Section 5.92 – Access to information by council, committee members
“(1) A person who is a council member or a committee member can have access to any information held by the local government that is relevant to the performance by the person of any of his or her functions under this Act or under any other written law.”
Strategic Implications
City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2001-2026
Objective 4.6 – Improve support for staff, Council and volunteers
Strategy 4.6.1
“Ensure staff, elected members and volunteers are provided with adequate training and resources to perform their duties.”
Policy Implications
The proposal seeks to amend the City’s Recording and Access to Tape Recordings of Council Meetings Policy, as shown in Attachment 1.
Financial Implications
Under the City’s current Schedule of Fees and Charges, copies of meeting recordings are available at a cost of $28.00 per tape.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ADOPT the revised Recording and Access to Recordings of Council Meetings Policy as shown below:
Recording and Access to Recordings of Council Meetings Policy
Policy Owner: Office of the CEO
Distribution: All Employees
Implementation: 14 August 2001 W342-08/01
Review 17 December 2002 - CE03-12/02
Reviewed: 23
September 2003 – CE03-09/03
01 December 2006 – GS01-12/06
23 September 2008 – GS03-09/08
Next Scheduled Review:
September 2010
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes, and that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings
for meetings of the Council, Eelectors, Audit
Committee and Public Question Time during Council Briefing Sessions shall
be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment, except in the case of
meetings of the Council or the Audit Committee, where the
Council or the Committee, as the case may be, closes
the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding
subclause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council or of the Audit Committee which
is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council or the Audit Committee, as
the case requires, resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the CD plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(76) Recordings
pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in
accordance with the State Records Act 2000 (General
Disposal Authority for Local Government Records). The current
requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This
policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council,
Electors and Special Electors and the Audit Committee meetings to
advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Responsibility for Implementation
Office of the CEO
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S02/0052V01
File Name: AA Conversion of Roadwise Advisory Committee to Roadwise Working Group and Amendment of Terms of Reference.doc This
Responsible Officer: Director Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the proposed conversion of the Roadwise Advisory Committee to a working group, and amendment of the relevant Terms of Reference.
Background
At the recommendation of the Department of Local Government and Regional Development (the Department) in October 2007, the City undertook a review of its internal committees, with a view to minimising the number of committees formally constituted under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act). As a result of this review, a number of committees were converted to working groups.
At that time, it was decided not to change the status of the Roadwise Advisory Committee.
This issue was discussed by the Roadwise Advisory Committee at its meeting on 20 August 2008.
Detail
Monitoring of the Committee’s agendas and minutes has revealed that, because of the nature of the issues being dealt with, it is often difficult for discussion to be confined strictly to those items listed on the agenda for a particular meeting.
Committees are appointed by Council under Clause 5.8 of the Act, and as such they are required to conduct their meetings in exactly the same manner as Council meetings. Given that none of Council’s Committees have any decision-making powers, the chief impact this requirement has on committee meetings in practice is that only items included on the Agenda for a particular meeting can be discussed at that meeting. There is no provision for General Business, or Business Arising from the Minutes.
The running of committees forms part of the annual Compliance Audit that must be submitted by the City to the Department. Instances where committees are found to be operating outside the requirements of the Act may result in a finding of non-compliance against the City.
Conversely, working groups are not formed under Section 5.8 of the Act, and therefore can adopt a more flexible approach to meetings. This can allow group members to propose ideas, ask questions and discuss issues with greater freedom than is possible where a meeting must strictly follow the provisions of the Standing Orders Local Law.
It has also become evident that although Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) and the WA Police Service are identified as required committee members in the Terms of Reference, no FESA representative has attended any of the nine meetings held since the beginning of 2007. The Police Service has only been represented at four of these meetings.
Attention is drawn to Clauses 2.1 and 3.3 of the Committee’s current Terms of Reference , which state as follows:
“2.1 The committee shall consist of the following representation:
· Four Councillor representatives from the City of Wanneroo;
· Director Infrastructure or nominee (Traffic Engineer);
· A maximum of four representatives from the community;
· Police Service representative (1);
· Fire and Emergency Services Authority of WA (FESA) representative (1);
· Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) Traffic Section representative (1);
· Western Australian Local Government Association RoadWise representative (1).”
“3.3 The quorum for a meeting shall be at least 50% of the number of endorsed members.”
Given that they are specifically identified in the Terms of Reference as “endorsed members”, the absence of FESA and Police Service representatives does have a potential impact on the ability of the Committee to form a quorum, particularly in view of the fact that two of the four available community representative positions are currently vacant.
It is suggested, therefore, that specific reference to FESA and Police Service representatives be removed from the Terms of Reference, leaving the Committee free to extend an invitation for FESA and/or the Police Service to attend as and when required.
Comment
Conversion to a working group would have no effect on the activities of the Roadwise Advisory Committee. Like committees, working groups can only be formed or disbanded by decision of Council, must operate in accordance with a Terms of Reference, must appoint a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson, and must produce an agenda and minutes for each meeting. Working group members are also required to disclose any interests in accordance with the provisions of the Act as they apply to ordinary Council meetings.
None of the advisory committees and/or working groups formed by the City of Wanneroo have any decision making powers, and therefore recommendations arising from a meeting must be submitted as a formal report to Council for consideration, regardless of whether the originating body is a committee or a working group.
Similarly, there is no provision for “General Business” to be discussed at either committee or working group meetings, and items on the agenda must be accompanied by a meaningful recommendation seeking a specific outcome or course of action.
The benefit to be gained from conversion to a working group is in the greater flexibility available in conducting meetings within the framework of the City’s adopted Management Procedure for Working Groups. If necessary, working group meetings can be conducted without a quorum at the Chairperson’s discretion, outcomes can be reached through general consensus rather than having to be recorded as a formal motion, and discussions are not subject to the formal rules of debate set down by the Standing Orders Local Law.
In addition, working groups are not subject to the same level of scrutiny with respect to compliance as are committees. An internal audit is conducted on a quarterly basis to ensure that working groups are operating in accordance with the City’s adopted management procedure, but the results of these audits do not form part of the City’s annual compliance audit return to the Department.
With respect to the review of the Committee’s Terms of Reference, it seems counterproductive to include, as endorsed committee members, parties who are unlikely to attend meetings on a regular basis.
Statutory Compliance
1. Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 2 — Council meetings, committees and their meetings and electors’ meetings
Subdivision 2 — Committees and their meetings
Clause 5.8 - Establishment of committees
“A local government may establish* committees of 3 or more persons to assist the council and to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the local government that can be delegated to committees.
* Absolute majority required.”
2. City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law 2000
Clause 5.4.2 – Ordinary Meetings
“Only business shown on the agenda will be discussed.”
Strategic Implications
City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021
Objective 4.7 – Maintain a High Standard of Governance and Accountability
Strategy 4.7.2
“Ensure compliance with relevant statutory authorities.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Roadwise Advisory Committee Recommendation – 20/08/08
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the conversion of the Roadwise Advisory Committee to the Roadwise Working Group; and
2. AMENDS the Terms of Reference for the Roadwise Working Group to remove specific reference to representatives of FESA and the WA Police Service as “endorsed members”.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057V04
File Name: AA Donation requests to be considered by Council.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy King
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a request for a donation in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
In accordance with this policy, the determination of sponsorship requests is divided as follows:-
Type of competition/exhibition/festival |
Amount of sponsorship provided |
Regional or State |
$75 per individual |
National |
$200 per individual |
International |
$500 per individual |
Capped at $600 per team |
Detail
During this period, the City has received three requests for a donation to be considered by Council. The requests are summarised on the following pages. The applications have been included in an attachment to this report (Attachment 1).
Comment
Applicant 1 – Perth Diamonds Sports Inc |
|
Request amount |
$5,736.38 |
Description of request |
Donation towards first aid services, umpires equipment for the Multicultural Softball Carnival to be held in Mirrabooka on 27 to 29 September 2008 and towards regular events. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation |
Yes |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Status of the applicant organisation |
Not for profit |
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to the community |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
This request supports Strategy 2.2.1 of Council’s Strategic Plan being “Encourage, support and provide a range of recreation and leisure opportunities, both active and passive.” |
Potential benefits to the Wanneroo community |
Not specified. |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
$1,100 from ‘other sources’ |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
$720 financial contribution $3,500 in-kind contribution |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Nil |
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Comments |
The policy states that requests with entry fees other than a gold coin donation will not be supported, unless the organisation will not incur any profit or gain from the entry fee, ie the applications must specifically state what the entry fees will be used for. This has not been specified. The policy states generic fundraising requests, profit making ventures will not be supported. This request is more suited to the City’s Community Funding Program, however under this policy the purchase of equipment and wages is not supported. |
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a request in the sum of $5,736.38 to the Perth Diamonds Sports Inc for a donation towards first aid services, umpires and equipment for the Multicultural Softball Carnival to be held in Mirrabooka on 27 to 29 September 2008 and towards regular events. |
Applicant 2 – Stacey Coonor-Espley |
|
Request amount |
$2,000 |
Description of request |
Donation towards hiring judges, hiring an MC for the day and stationery expenses. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation |
There is a $10 entry fee per person, however no profit will be made from the event. |
Status of the applicant organisation |
Not for profit |
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to the community |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
This request supports Strategy 2.2.1 of Council’s Strategic Plan being “Encourage, support and provide a range of recreation and leisure opportunities, both active and passive.” |
Potential benefits to the Wanneroo community |
There is not an event of this nature further north of Joondalup. The population of the northern suburbs of the City are growing each day and this community event will provide residents with the opportunity to show their musical talents. Many local businesses are providing substantial support for the event. |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
$4,100 from ‘other sources’ |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
Substantial in kind contribution |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
The Butler Community Centre is being hired to hold the event and Leisure Services have provided this venue at no cost. |
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Comments |
The policy states that requests with entry fees other than a gold coin donation will not be supported, unless the organisation will not incur any profit or gain from the entry fee, ie the applications must specifically state what the entry fees will be used for. All entry fees will be used to pay for the event, no profit will be made. Leisure Services have identified this group as a non commercial entity and have therefore provided the Butler Community Centre at no charge. A request of this nature may be considered more appropriate for the City’s Community Funding Program. The coordinator of this event has been advised of the Program and is likely to apply for next year’s Eisteddfod through the March 2009 funding round. |
Recommendation |
APPROVE a request for a donation in the sum of $2,000 towards the cost of hiring judges, hiring an MC for the day and stationery expenses for the Brighton Eisteddfod to be held at Butler Community Centre on 29 November 2008. |
Request amount |
$1,000 annually |
Description of request |
Donation towards the cost of subsiding cat sterilisation for Wanneroo residents. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation |
Nil |
Status of the applicant organisation |
Registered Charity |
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to City of Wanneroo residents who use specific veterinarians in Kingsway and Yanchep and hold a Heath Care/Pension card. |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
|
Potential benefits to the Wanneroo community |
No wide community benefit. Only available to cat owners of the City who hold Heath Care/Pension cards and utilise specific veterinarians in Kingsway and Yanchep. |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Not specified. |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
Approx $20,000 in kind contribution Approx $37,000 financial contribution |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Nil. |
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Comments |
This organisation operates outside of the City of Wanneroo and does not have any City of Wanneroo members. As the organisation only provides services to specific veterinarians in two out of 36 suburbs of the City of Wanneroo and is only available to those who hold a Heath Care or Pension card it may be considered that wide community benefit is not obtained. The request is for a regular annual donation. |
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a request for an annual donation in the sum of $1,000 to the Cat Sterilisation Society Inc towards the cost of subsidising cat sterilisation. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations is aligned with the City’s strategic direction as follows:
“2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.
2.2.1 Encourage, support and provide a range of recreation and leisure opportunities, both active and passive.”
Policy Implications
This report complies with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy.
Financial Implications
Budget 2008/2009 |
$58,064 |
Amount expended to date Under delegated authority: By Council determination |
$4,513.75 $7,954.37 |
Impact of approval of recommended delegated authority applications: Sponsorships: Donations and Waiver of Fees: |
$0.00 $2,000.00 |
TOTAL |
$2,000.00 |
Remaining Funds |
$40,635.88 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOT APPROVE a request for the sum of $5,736.38 to the Perth Diamonds Sports Inc for a donation towards first aid services, umpires and equipment for the Multicultural Softball Carnival to be held in Mirrabooka on 27 to 29 September 2008 and towards regular events;
2. APPROVE a request for a donation in the sum of $2,000 towards the cost of hiring judges, hiring an MC for the day and stationery expenses for the Brighton Eisteddfod to be held at Butler Community Centre on 29 November 2008; and
3. NOT APPROVE a request for an annual donation in the sum of $1,000 to the Cat Sterilisation Society Inc towards the cost of subsidising cat sterilisation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S41/0022V02
File Name: A Strategic Plan Review 2008.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Governance & Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Corporate Performance Officer Strategic Planning
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachment/s Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the proposed methodology for the biennial review of the Strategic Plan 2006-2021.
Background
Council endorsed the current Strategic Plan 2006-2021 on 16 May 2006 (Item GS04-05/06). The Strategic Plan supercedes the former Principal Activities Plan and is the equivalent of the “plan for the future” as required under the Local Government Act 1995.
Detail
To comply with the above regulation, the Strategic Plan must be reviewed every 2 years and is now due for review. Preliminary work commenced in July 2008 and it is expected that the review will be completed by December 2008.
An internal Strategic Plan Review Working Group consisting of key staff across the organisation has been established to assess performance to date and provide direction and advice to Executive Management and Council throughout the review process.
A consultant will be appointed to assist the City throughout the review process, facilitate workshops across the organisation and prepare a draft revised plan. A Request for Quotation has been sent to several appropriately qualified consultants and responses are currently under evaluation, with an appointment expected to made by early September.
The development of the Strategic Plan 2006-2021 has formed the basis of the methodology adopted for this review and will broadly consist of the following steps:
· Assessment of current strategies, alignment and outcomes to date;
· Review of internal and external data (surveys) for consideration;
· Series of development workshops with elected members, staff and the community;
· Development of a draft updated Strategic Plan;
· Elected members, staff and community consultation on the draft; and
· Revision and launch of the revised Strategic Plan.
Comment
It is envisaged that at least one ½ day consultant facilitated workshop will be held across all stakeholder groups and elected members as part of the collaborative approach to the review. The timings of the workshops will be confirmed shortly, however a combination of weekday, evening or weekends will be used to ensure maximum flexibility. Elected members are strongly encouraged to participate in the workshops in order to gain oversight into the process and provide valued input into the future direction of the City.
Statutory Compliance
The biennial review of the Strategic Plan 2006-2021 is a legislative requirement under the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
A review of the Strategic Plan 2006-2021 encourages the alignment of operational and strategic activity to ensure the achievement of the City’s vision and mission.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
An amount of $15,000 for consultancy services to assist in the review has been allocated in the 2008/09 adopted budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES the need for a review of the Strategic Plan under the Local Government Act 1995;
2. ENDORSES the proposed methodology of the Strategic Plan Review; and
3. NOTES the engagement of stakeholders, including elected members and the timeframe for the completion of the review.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: C08036V01
File Name: CA Tender No 08036 Provision for Contract Labour Hire Services.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Governance and Strategy
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Author: Coordinator Human Resources
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No 08036 for the provision of Contract Labour Hire for a period of one (1) year.
Background
Various Service Units use contract labour hire when there is a requirement for temporary increases to staffing requirements or the provision of relief staff for short periods of time. The existing contract with Integrated Workforce expires on the 30 September 2008.
As Contract Number 05526 expires on the 30 September 2008 the provision of contract labour hire for a period of one (1) year was advertised for tender.
Detail
Tender No 08036 was advertised on 26 July 2008 and closed on 12 August 2008.
Essential details of the new contract are shown in the following table:-
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Contract Duration |
One (1) year with the option of a further three extensions of one (1) year each, or a part thereof. |
Commencement Date |
1 October 2008 |
Expiry Date |
30 September 2009 |
Extensions Permitted |
Yes – Three 12 month options, or a part thereof, up to 30 September 2012 |
Rise and Fall Included |
Not in the contract period, but CPI is applicable on the extensions if activated. |
Tenders were received from the companies listed as follows:-
· IPA Personnel;
· Axecot P/L;
· Adecco Services;
· Integrated Group Ltd;
· Red Source Personnel;
· Flexi Staff Pty Ltd;
· Drake Australia Pty Ltd;
· Richards Mining Services; and
· Green Skills/Ecojobs Environmental Personnel.
Tender Evaluation
The Tender Evaluation Team comprising of:
· Manager Human Resources;
· Human Resources Officer – Recruitment;
· Manager Waste & Fleet Services;
· A/Manager, Infrastructure Maintenance;
· Contracts Office; and
· Coordinator Human Resources.
With the exception of Greenskills as their submission was an alternative tender and not offering all the types of staff required for this contract, the above team evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following assessment criteria as detailed in the tender document:-
· Price for Services offered;
· Tenderers Resources;
· Tenderers Previous experience in carrying out work similar to the services; and
· Safety Management.
The Tender evaluation team scored each tender against the established criteria and reported as follows:-
1. Price for Services offered
As the price schedule included a range of salary levels in order to obtain an effective comparison tenders were compared in price in both overall terms and on those levels predominantly utilised by the City. While the ranking below indicates the final result after combining both comparisons the reality was that the top three (3) were extremely close with very minimal difference in price for the most commonly required groups.
This criteria represents 60% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:-
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
Integrated Group |
2 |
Axecot P/L |
3 |
Flexi Staff |
4 |
Red Source |
5 |
IPA Personnel |
6 |
Richards Mining |
7 |
Adecco Services |
8 |
Drake Australia Pty Ltd |
2. Tenderers Resources
In this element the Evaluation Team were not only looking for the resources within the Company but also the methodology and technology used to source the required staff. In addition they were also looking for an indication of the resource base that the company could draw upon to provide the appropriately trained contract staff.
This criteria represents 20% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:-
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
Integrated Group Ltd |
1 |
Drake Australia |
1 |
Red Source |
1 |
IPA Personnel |
2 |
Flexi Staff |
3 |
Adecco Services |
4 |
Skilled Group Ltd |
5 |
Chandler-Macleod Ltd |
3. Tenderers Previous experience in carrying out work similar to the services
In this element the Evaluation Team were assessing what relevant and recent experience each tenderer had and particularly in Local Government.
This criteria represents 10% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:-
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
Integrated Group Ltd |
1 |
Drake Australia |
1 |
Flexi Staff |
1 |
IPA Personnel |
2 |
Red Source Personnel |
3 |
Adecco Services |
4 |
Richards Mining Services |
5 |
Axecot |
4. Safety Management
The Tender specifications require each Tenderer to answer 33 separate questions concerning their Occupational Safety and Health management systems and a copy of Tenderer’s Safety Policy. The questionnaire and size and content of Policies offered differed and Tenderers were therefore marked accordingly.
This criteria represents 10% of the total score and resulted in the following ranking:-
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
Integrated Group Ltd |
1 |
Red Sources Personnel |
1 |
IPA Personnel |
1 |
Flexi Staff |
Rank |
Tenderer |
2 |
Drake Australia Pty Ltd |
2 |
Adecco Services |
3 |
Richards Mining Services |
4 |
Axecot P/L |
Overall Weighted Scoring
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tenderer against the above-established criteria, which resulted in the following overall ranking:-
Rank |
Tenderer |
1 |
Integrated Group Ltd |
2 |
Flexi Staff |
3 |
IPA Personnel |
4 |
Red Sources Personnel |
5 |
Axecot P/L |
6 |
Drake Australia |
7 |
Adecco Services |
8 |
Richards Mining Services |
Comment
Based on the overall ranking of tenders, it is recommended that the tender from Integrated Group Ltd for the provision of Contract Labour Hire for a period of one (1) year be accepted, as they provide the best overall value to the City.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
The Manager, Contracts and Property has examined the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process and result.
Strategic Implications
The supply of Contract Labour Hire is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) goals objectives:-
“Objective 4.6 – Ensure staff, elected members and volunteers are provided with adequate training and resources to perform their duties.”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
It is difficult to determine the cost of the contract, as it is variable depending on movements of the workforce and work allocation. Reference is made to the 2007/2008 actual costs for the contract last year, which equated to $1,791,208.64.
Each Service Unit has budgeted for the estimated operational costs of the contract in the 2008/2009 budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 08036 from
Integrated Group Ltd for the provision of Contract Labour Hire for a period of
one (1) year from 1 October 2008 to
30 September 2009, with options to extend the contract for a further three (3)
twelve (12) month periods, or a part thereof, to 30 September 2012.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057V04
File Name: A Donation requests considered under the Delegated Authority of the A Chief Executive Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tammy King
Meeting Date: 23 Sept 2008
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To note donation applications considered and determined by the A/Chief Executive Officer during August 2008, in accordance with the provisions of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy delegates the consideration and determination of requests for donations, sponsorships and the waiver of fees and charges under the value of $500 to the Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
During August 2008, the City received the following requests to be considered under the delegated authority of the Chief Executive Officer:
1. Six (6) requests for sponsorship
2. Two (2) requests for a donation
3. Nil (0) requests for a waiver of fees
Comment
In accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy, determinations were made as listed in the recommendations to this report.
Applications and assessments of each request against the policy one available in the Elected Members Reading Room for further information. Among other criteria, sponsorship is given to individuals who reside within the City of Wanneroo, are 18 years of age or under and have not already received sponsorship in the same financial year. Donations are given to groups who are located or have primary business within the City of Wanneroo and 75% or more of their membership resides within the City of Wanneroo.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
This report aligns with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
The financial implications of this round of requests has resulted in expenditure in the Award Governance Donations Account (717633-1207-316) of $2,985.00 from 2008/2009 budget.
Budget 2008/09 |
$58,064.00 |
Total funds awarded to date (by Delegated Authority and by Council) |
$15,428.12 |
Remaining in Budget |
$42,635.88 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of requests received by the City in August 2008 for donations, sponsorships and waiver of fees and charges, which are as follows:-
Organisation |
Event/Activity |
Recommendation |
Reason |
1. WA Institute of Sport |
2008 Beijing Olympic Games held in China from 9 to 24 August 2008 |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $500 for the participation of Daria Joura at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games held in China from 9 to 24 August 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
2. Winton Warriors Inline Hockey Club |
Inline Hockey National Championships to be held in Adelaide from 29 September to 4 October 2008. |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $400 for the participation of Zane Cunliffe and Jaymie McDonnell at the Inline Hockey National Championships to be held in Adelaide from 29 September to 4 October 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
3. Hocking Primary School |
Purchase of a worm farm for year 3 students. |
APPROVE a donation in the sum of $85.00 towards Hocking Primary School for the purchase of a worm farm for year 3 students. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
4. North Coast Rugby Football Club |
Purchase of items for the Home Carnival event held at Kingsbridge Park, Butler on 16 August 2008. |
APPROVE a donation in the sum of $500 to the North Coast Rugby Football Club for the purchase of food and promotional materials for the Home Carnival held at Kingsbridge Park, Butler on 16 August 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
5. Associated & Catholic Colleges of WA |
2008 China Stars Friendship Games to be held in Beijing from 24 September to 3 October 2008. |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $500 for the participation of Rhys Martin at the 2008 China Stars Friendship Games to be held in Beijing from 24 September to 3 October 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
6. Woodvale Senior High School |
National Schools Basketball Tournament to be held in New South Wales from 8 to 12 December 2008. |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $400 for the participation of James Anthony and Jordan Perret at the National Schools Basketball Tournament to be held in New South Wales from 8 to 12 December 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
7. Australian Irish Dancing Association |
Irish Dancing National Championships to be held in Hobart from 1 to 5 October 2008. |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $200 for the participation of Jade Elkin at the Irish Dancing National Championships to be held in Hobart from 1 to 5 October 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
8. Lacrosse West |
Under 15s National Lacrosse Championships to be held at McGilvray Oval, Perth from 28 September to 5 October 2008. |
APPROVE a sponsorship request in the sum of $400 for the participation of Hayley Simpson and Rebecca Bowland Curtis at the Under 15s National Lacrosse Championships to be held at McGilvray Oval, Perth from 28 September to 5 October 2008. |
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S24/0097
File Name: A Appointment of Acting Directors.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: John Paton
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
Attachments: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider acting arrangements for the positions of Director, Planning and Development and Director, Community Development.
Background
Council at its ordinary meeting on 1 July 2008 (CE02-07/08) endorsed the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer:
“That Council ENDORSES the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to extend the appointment of Fiona Bentley as Acting Director Planning and Development and Garry Prus as Acting Director Community Development for a maximum period up to 30 September 2008.”
Detail
Under the Local Government Act (1995) Council is required to endorse the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to appoint senior employees and any person acting in the position.
Fiona Bentley and Garry Prus were originally appointed Acting Director, Planning and Development and Acting Director, Community Development respectively on 12 November 2007 upon the resignation of Mr Roman Zagwocki, the former Director, Planning and Development. Council has subsequently extended their appointment successively through to 30 September 2008, pending the appointment of a replacement Director Planning and Development (now retitled Director Planning and Sustainability).
Council at its ordinary meeting on 26 August 2008 (CE02-08/08) endorsed the recommendation of the Acting Chief Executive Officer:
“That Council ACCEPTS the proposal of the Acting Chief Executive Officer to appoint Mr Len Kosova to the position of Director Planning and Sustainability on a five year performance based contract, under section 5.37 of the Local Government Act 1995, with the commencement subject to negotiation.”
Indicatively a commencement date has been proposed for the commencement of the new Director, Planning and Sustainability of 1 December 2008. Accordingly, it is necessary to consider the ‘acting’ positions beyond 30 September 2008.
Section 5.39(1a) of the Local Government Act (1995) states:
“(a) an employee may act in the position of a CEO or a senior employee for a term not exceeding one year without a written contract for the position in which he or she is acting.”
In addition, Subsection (2)(a) goes on to qualify that a contract under this section:
“(a) in the case of an acting or temporary position, cannot be for a term exceeding one year.”
As a consequence, it would not be appropriate to extend the acting role for either Mrs Bentley, or Mr Prus beyond the 12 month expiry date, being 12 November 2008. The following arrangements are therefore proposed:
· Mrs Fiona Bentley is attending a conference and taking annual leave from 10 November 2008. She is currently a contracted senior employee of Council, in the position of Director Community Development. It is recommended that Council endorse an extension of Mrs Bentley’s acting responsibilities as Director Planning and Development from Wednesday 1 October 2008 until Friday 7 November 2008 inclusive. Following her period of annual leave, Mrs Bentley will return to her substantive position of Director Community Development (1 December 2008);
· Mr Shane Spinks, Manager Leisure Services be appointed Acting Director Community Development from 1 October 2008 to 1 December 2008 inclusive; and
· A further recommendation for a temporary acting Director from 8 November 2008 until the commencement of Mr Len Kosova can be dealt with at a later stage, pending confirmation of commencement date.
Comment
Mrs Fiona Bentley and Mr Garry Prus have both provided excellent service and maintained continuity at the executive management level during the protracted process of recruiting a Director Planning and Sustainability. However, due to the requirements of the Local Government Act, it is necessary to limit any extended period of acting to less than one year.
In the case of Mrs Bentley, as she is a permanent senior employee (Director Community Development) and given the timing of programmed leave for a conference and annual leave, her acting appointment can continue through to 7 November 2008.
Given that the flow on impact is that Mrs Bentley will not be returning to her substantive Director position until 1 December 2008 (including her period of leave), it is necessary to consider an alternate arrangement for the acting role. To ensure that the acting position provides a suitable period of development it is proposed that the appointment be for the full period from 1 October 2008 to 1 December 2008. During this period, it is considered that Mr Shane Spinks could undertake the role with a high degree of competency.
Statutory Compliance
Section 53.6 of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that Council appoint the Chief Executive Officer, and this extends to the appointment of an Acting Director of Planning and Development and Acting Director of Community Development. The Department of Local Government has confirmed that the Local Government Act 1995 further requires Council to endorse the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to appoint senior employees.
Strategic Implications
Consistent with the City’s 2006-2021 Strategic Plan and meets the following Objective –
“4.7 Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ENDORSES the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to:
1. Extend the appointment of Mrs Fiona Bentley as Acting Director, Planning and Development from 1 October 2008 to 7 November 2008 inclusive;
2. Appoint Mr Shane Spinks as Acting Director, Community Development from 1 October 2008 to 1 December 2008 inclusive; and
3. Note that a further report will be presented at a subsequent Council meeting recommending an acting position for the Director Planning and Development for the period 7 November 2008 until the commencement of the new Director.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S24/0023v02
File Name: A Engagement of Assistance to Lobby Federal Government.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: John Paton
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the engagement of Mr Graham Edwards to provide assistance to the City in lobbying Federal Ministers and Government officials.
Background
Local Government is increasingly under pressure to fund community programs, and provide social and economic infrastructure in order to remain sustainable into the future.
With the election of the Rudd Labor Government in early 2008, there has been a move away from some of the previous Government’s funding initiatives, with the announcement of new opportunities for funding for local governments.
The Federal Government provides untied funding through its Financial Assistance Grants (FAGs) legislation and tied funding directed towards priority projects including Roads to Recovery and a number of smaller health and community projects. The Federal Government has recently announced new funding programs for infrastructure provision such as the Building Australia Fund through Infrastructure Australia, the Housing Affordability Fund and the transition of the Area Consultative Committees (ACCs) into local Regional Development Australia committees.
Detail
The City, through its Advocacy Plan and Economic Development Strategy has identified a number of projects that could benefit from partnering opportunities with the Federal Government. It is also important that our Federal representatives are made aware of the hyper-growth that is continuing in the Northern Corridor of Perth, and that we have access to decision-makers in addressing an active collaborative, planned approach to the provision of community and economic infrastructure. Without critical infrastructure Wanneroo’s employment self-sufficiency and housing affordability will not improve sufficiently to keep abreast of the continuing growth in population and the expectations of residents.
Local infrastructure across Australia is under the spotlight, with Engineers Australia identifying issues such as stormwater, secondary roads and metropolitan rail systems as areas requiring urgent attention. Wanneroo is not alone in seeking additional funding and partnering opportunities, and it is considered that a strategy to lobby Cabinet Members and senior Government officials should be considered by Council. The engagement of a person with a parliamentary background to assist with introductions to Ministers and Government officials, and who is cognisant of Labor policies, is one way of lifting the profile of the City.
Comment
To effectively advocate on behalf of the City at a Federal level it is envisaged that the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer (or nominees) should travel to Canberra or the East Coast regularly to communicate personally with Cabinet Ministers & their senior staff and senior Government officials.
To enable introductions and keep abreast of Federal policies it is recommended that the City engage a person with a high standing within the community and preferably with a parliamentary background that can assist the Mayor and the CEO in their lobbying activities. “Lobbying activities” means any oral, written or electronic communications with a Government representative in an effort to influence Government decision-making, including the making or amendment of legislation, the development or amendment of a Government policy or program, the awarding of a Government contract or grant or the allocation of funding.
“Lobbying is a legitimate activity and an important part of the democratic process. Lobbyists can help individuals and organisations communicate their views on matters of public interest to the Government and, in doing so, improve outcomes for the individual and the community as a whole”. [Australian Government; Department of Premier & Cabinet Web Site].
A lobbyist is defined in clause 3 of the Code to mean a person, company or organisation that conducts lobbying activities on behalf of a client or whose employees conduct lobbying activities on behalf of a client. These lobbyists are sometimes known as consultant lobbyists, or third party lobbyists.
Whilst the person assisting the Mayor and the CEO in their lobbying activities will not be engaged as a “lobbyist” their activities will assist with introductions and advice on government policy and therefore could be perceived as being a “lobbyist”. In relation to good governance and for public transparency and ethical reasons, an individual engaged in lobbying activities is required to register as a lobbyist under the Federal Government’s Lobbyist Register and practice under the Lobbying Code of Conduct.
For this reason the City will ask the person to register so that any communication they undertake on behalf of the City is transparent and in the public domain.
The Register of Lobbyists is a public document. It contains the following details about persons, companies and organisations that lobby Government representatives on behalf of a client:
· the business registration details and trading names of the lobbyist including, where the business is not a publicly listed company, the names of owners, partners or major shareholders, as applicable;
· the names and positions of persons employed, contracted or otherwise engaged by the lobbyist to carry out lobbying activities; and
· the names of clients on whose behalf the lobbyist conducts lobbying activities.
In engaging an individual to assist the Mayor and the CEO in their lobbying activities on behalf of the City of Wanneroo it is considered important that the individual meets the following criteria:
· a high public profile (preferably at a Federal level);
· highly regarded in the City of Wanneroo community;
· has relevant knowledge of the problems and issues facing Local Government, and in particular, the City of Wanneroo;
· has knowledge of current Federal policies, particularly in relation to partnership opportunities and Federal funding initiatives; and
· has access to Cabinet Ministers, Parliamentary Secretaries or their senior staff and senior public service Government officials and Board Chairs.
The former Federal Member for Cowan, Mr Graham Edwards (ALP), retired from Federal politics at the last election in 2007. Mr Edwards served 14 years in the WA State Parliament with a number of posts as a Cabinet Minister and as Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council from 1993-96. Mr Edwards left state politics at the 1996 state election, winning Cowan in 1998. Prior to his parliamentary career Mr Edwards served in the regular army for three years, and ten years in the Commonwealth Public Service.
Cowan covers an area of approximately 195 sq km from Banksia Grove in the North to Noranda in the South. The division covers parts of four local government areas – the City of Wanneroo, the City of Joondalup, the City of Swan and the City of Bayswater. Suburbs in the City of Wanneroo include: Alexander Heights, Ashby, Banksia Grove, Carramar, Darch, Girrawheen, Jandabup, Koondooola, Landsdale, Madeley, Marangaroo, part of Mariginiup, Pearsall, Sinagra, Tapping, Wangara and Wanneroo.
Mr Edwards is undoubtedly a high profile, highly regarded City of Wanneroo community representative and meets all of the considered criteria. Having recently retired he is well placed to introduce City representatives into the Federal political arena.
As the City of Wanneroo is a Local Government Authority and much of its income is derived from rates and charges and grants funding, it is considered appropriate that engagement of the individual is based on a voluntary basis – that is the individual will not receive a salary or consultancy fee – but the City will bear the costs of air fares; accommodation; meals; and incidental expenses such as taxi fares under the current Elected Members Travel Policy.
Should the recommendation to engage Mr Edwards be endorsed by Council, it is expected that the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer will travel to Canberra towards the end of the year. It is proposed that meetings be arranged to discuss the following:
· Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, the Honourable Anthony Albanese MP – Building Australia Fund – major capital and community infrastructure and cost shifting to Local Government;
· Minister for Housing, the Honourable Tanya Plibersek – the Housing Affordability Fund; and
· Sir Rod Eddington, Chair of the recently established Infrastructure Australia Board, which will be conducting a national audit of significant infrastructure by the end of 2008 and developing an Infrastructure Priority List.
It is expected that the Chief Executive Officer will provide a briefing note to a Council Forum after a visit to keep all elected members informed of any developments or progress.
Statutory Compliance
An individual perceived as lobbying on behalf of an organisation must apply to be included on the Federal Government’s Register of Lobbyists and act in accordance with the Lobbyist Code of Conduct. The City will require written confirmation that an individual has been accepted onto the register before any activities are undertaken.
Strategic Implications
Without enhancing our profile at the highest political level to reinforce the specific problems faced by a high growth council, particularly in the Northern Corridor of Perth, the City may be retarded in its ability to acquire new and traditional funding, and opportunities for collaboration and partnering.
The City’s Strategic Plan Outcome 3 – Economic, states:
“A prosperous Region achieved through economic growth and employment.
3.1.1 Promote investment that advances the development of commercial and industrial areas within the City.
3.2.1 Advocate for the timely provision of infrastructure to facilitate economic growth.
3.2.3 Identify and implement t the preferred options for fast-tracking regional infrastructure.
3.5.2 Encourage workforce participation and local employment placement.”
The City’s Strategic Plan Outcome 4 – Governance, provides:
4.1.1 Establish and actively manage a range of partnerships that add value to our services and support the changing and diverse needs of the community.”
Financial Implications
Travel, accommodation, meals and incidental expenses will be met by the City of Wanneroo from the Elected Members Travel Account and in accordance with the Elected Members Travel Policy.
Mr Edwards will not receive a consulting fee in respect of his activities on behalf of the City.
The outcome of this process and increased exposure at a federal level could deliver significant funding opportunities to the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENGAGE Mr Graham Edwards to assist the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer in their lobbying activities, and ask Mr Edwards to register himself on the Australian Government’s Lobbyist Register and comply with the Lobbyist Register Code of Conduct;
2. APPROVE travel, accommodation and incidental expenses from the Elected Members Travel Account, for interstate travel by Mr Edwards based on the Elected Members Travel Policy;
3. APPROVE the interstate travel of the Mayor (or nominee) and the Chief Executive Officer to participate in meetings with Federal Government Cabinet Ministers, senior ministerial staff, or heads of departments or committees, when engaged in lobbying and advocacy meetings on behalf of the City, with funding provided through the Elected Members Travel account; and
4. NOTE that the CEO will prepare a Briefing Note to a Council Forum after interstate lobbying or advocacy visits by the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to fully inform Council.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R01/0004V01
File Name: BA U Turn Facility on Alexander Drive Alexander heights.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Cr Blencowe
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Dennis Blair
Meeting Date: 23 September 2008
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the provision of a ‘U’ turn facility in the median of Alexander Drive, Alexander Heights to service properties between 211 and 227 Alexander Drive Alexander Heights.
Background
A seagull island treatment has recently been constructed at the Alexander Drive/Greenpark Road intersection as part of the 2008/2009 State Black Spot Program. The residents along Alexander Drive were not notified of these works.
Detail
The residents on the western side of Alexander Drive and to the south of Greenpark Road have used this intersection for many years to undertake ‘U’ turns to travel south along Alexander Drive. The installation of the seagull island treatment has denied them the ability to use this intersection to travel south towards Perth.
The point of view which administration has offered that there is already a ‘U’ turn facility north of Fenchurch Street to service homes in that vicinity is not acceptable to the affected owners as it requires them to travel nearly one kilometre away from Perth in order to travel towards it.
Comment
One of the affected property owners advised that he has contacted 13 home owners in the nine homes affected and they are unanimous that they were not notified or consulted on this matter and that they are all inconvenienced by the City’s decision to proceed with the works.
There is a recent precedent for this procedure just around the corner in Beach Road where the City has constructed a ‘U’ turn facility in front of Mercy College to stop ‘U’ turns being carried out at the corner of Butterfield Road and Beach Road. There are also three similar facilities in Marangaroo Drive which has an identical scenario of homes accessing one side of the road
This motion is intended to ensure that the residents are not disenfranchised by the City’s decision to make Greenpark Road safer and that they are not denied the right they have enjoyed for many years.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. INITIATES proceedings as a matter of urgency for the provision of an additional ‘U’ turn facility in Alexander Drive, in the vicinity of Greenpark Road to service the properties between 211 and 227 Alexander Drive;
2. REQUESTS Administration to report to Council for final approval of the plans and funding source for the proposed ‘U’ turn facility; and
3. REQUESTS that the residents of the properties between 221 and 227 Alexander Drive be consulted as part of the development of plans for the proposed ‘U’ turn facility.
Administration Comment
Alexander Drive is classified as a District Distributor "A" on Council's functional road hierarchy, has a posted speed limit of 70kph and carries approximately 25,800 vehicles per day.
The intersection of Greenpark Road and Alexander Drive was identified as an accident black spot with the main accident type at this intersection being right angle crashes (four in the western carriageway and three in the eastern carriageway). The construction of a seagull island in the median break was chosen because it channelises the traffic streams and provide protection for turning vehicles.
Council at its meeting on 17 July 2007 (Item No IN06-07/07) endorsed the submission for funding in the 2008/2009 State and Federal AusLink Blackspot Program of eight projects, including:
‘Alexander Drive/Greenpark Road, Alexander Heights – construct a seagull island in the Alexander Drive median break to separate and channelise traffic streams’
The "U Turn" facility on Beach Road was primarily constructed to remove the high rate of "U-Turn" traffic from the Butterworth Avenue intersection where they were seen as probable contributors to the high accident rate at that intersection. Beach Road has a posted speed limit of 70kph and the Butterworth Avenue intersection is also equipped with a seagull island.
Seagull islands do not prevent "U turns" and making a "U turns" at one is not illegal, unless explicitly signed, but they can be more difficult to execute depending on direction of entry.
At both Butterworth Avenue and Greenpark Road the "U-turn" movement is from the same side of the median as the terminating side street. This leads to competition for the same turning slot in the median. The "U-turn" traffic also has no deceleration lane on the main road and therefore involves slowing or stopping in the outside lane of the main road, which has a high level of risk.
Alexander Drive has a "U-Turn" facility, located to the north of the Fenchurch Street intersection, that provides a safe turning facility for all residents with direct access to Alexander Drive western carriageway.
Residents on Alexander Drive to the south of Greenpark Road also have the option of using the Illawarra Crescent North intersection, which terminates from the east and is equipped with both a deceleration lane and a seagull island and is a much safer place to turn than Greenpark Road.
The recommended minimum separation distance between junctions on a District Distributor "A" category road is 150 metres (Austroads Part 5 - Intersections at Grade - Section 3.8). There is approximately 395 metres between the Greenpark Road and Illawarra Crescent North intersections which could therefore accomodate an additional "U-Turn" facility.
The construction of a "U-Turn" facility and deceleration lane on Alexander Drive between Greenpark Road and Illawarra Crescent, to serve the 9 properties south of Greenpark Road, would cost approximately $60,000 for a resulting reduction in travel distance of approximately 400 metres compared to the distance required if the turn was undertaken at the Illawarra Crescent North intersection.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: CF-000
Responsible Officer: Deputy Mayor Treby
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
File Name: ACr Treby.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To address the decision by Cr Miles to remain as an elected member representing the North Ward of the City of Wanneroo following his election to State Parliament.
Background
Cr Miles was a candidate for the seat of Wanneroo in the recent Western Australian State Elections. Following the completion of the vote count, Cr Miles has been declared the successful candidate.
Detail
Having been elected to Parliament as the Member for Wanneroo, Cr Miles has confirmed that he also intends to remain as an elected member representing the North Ward of the City of Wanneroo through to October 2009.
The North Ward representation on Council will be greatly diminished due to the conflicting priorities and focus by Cr Miles towards his State responsibilities at the expense of those in the North Ward.
These conflicting priorities will deny the residents of the North Ward effective and equal representation as received by other ratepayers throughout the City.
It has been the custom and practice of Councillors successful in achieving election to higher levels of government to resign their position on Council, recognising that the interests of the ratepayers should not be compromised as a result.
Cr Miles’ position as compared to those others (in this election at the Cities of Perth, Swan and Joondalup) who have chosen to hold both positions differ greatly – as all others are in the final stages of their term of office on their respective councils, not at the start.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 2 – Constitution of local government
Division 5 – Qualifications for holding office on the council
Section 2.20 – Members of parliament disqualified for election
“(1) A person is disqualified from being elected as a member of a council is the person is a member of parliament.
(2) In this section –
member of parliament means –
(a) a member of the Legislative Assembly;
(b) a member of the Legislative Council, including a person who has been elected as a member of that House but is not yet entitled to sit or vote in that House because of section 8(2) of the Constitution Acts Amendment Act 1899;
(c) a member of the House of Representatives; or
(d) a senator, including a person who has been elected as a senator but whose term of service as a senator has not yet begun.”
Further clarification has been received from the Department of Local Government and Regional Development, as follows:
“Does a sitting Councillor or Mayor who is elected to parliament have to resign from Council?
No, if a Councillor or (Elector) Mayor wins election to State Parliament in September 2008, then that person’s seat on Council will fall vacant at the next ordinary local government election day – ie, third Saturday October 2009.
So, if the Councillor or (Elector) Mayor wins election to State Parliament in September 2008, that person can continue to occupy the seat on Council up until October 2009, but not beyond.”
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
If a resignation is received that becomes effective prior to the third week in January 2009, then Council will be obliged to conduct an extraordinary election. Obviously there will be costs associated with this, however these cannot be calculated without a receiving a quote from the WA Electoral Commission.
If a resignation is received that takes effect during the period from the third week in January 2009 to the third week in July 2009, then Council may apply to the Electoral Commissioner for permission to delay filling the vacancy until the next ordinary local government election in October 2009.
Vacancies that occur as a result of a resignation taking effect after the third week in July 2009 will automatically be held over until the October 2009 ordinary local government elections.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. EXPRESSES its disappointment that Cr Miles has chosen to remain as a Councillor of the City of Wanneroo for the remainder of his term; and
2. NOTES that the decision by Cr Miles to remain and occupy this position is in his best interests and not those of the ratepayers of the North Ward.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Name: ACouncillor Steffens.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
File Ref: R24/0003V01
Responsible Officer: Cr Steffens
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a reduction in the current speed limit of 90km/h on Wanneroo Road Nowergup to 70km/h for one kilometre on either side of the Hester Avenue intersection.
Background
The speed limit on Wanneroo Road is 90km/h, while on Hester Avenue, a distributor road, the speed limit is 70km/h. Traffic is controlled at this intersection by ‘stop’ signs on either side of the right hand lane turning into Wanneroo Road. Traffic travelling through the Hester Avenue intersection, north and south along Wanneroo Road, does so at this speed, and at times in excess of this speed. Over the past five years there have been 51 recorded crashes by Main Roads WA (MRWA).
A survey was undertaken at this intersection on 11 May 2007, from 6.30am to 8.30am. Present were representatives from MRWA, the Police Service, City of Wanneroo, Wanneroo Towing Service, a member of the public, who drives a semi trailer through this intersection on a daily basis, and myself. The survey found that 363 vehicles on Hester Avenue approaching the ‘stop’ sign at Wanneroo Road, and intending to make a right hand turn, did not stop. On five separate occasions during the period caused near misses with traffic turning right from Wanneroo Road into Hester Avenue. Of the 363 vehicles, 13 were trucks; one empty full size bus and two were motorcycles. Some 17 vehicles continued to roll through the intersection in succession
The MRWA representative advised at this meeting that the seagull island on the northern side of Hester Avenue required modification and the median island on Wanneroo Road, from the single lane to the dual lanes, needed the vegetation thinned out as large trucks using the service road where the two service stations are could not see oncoming traffic when crossing Wanneroo Road to turn north towards Hester Avenue. Up until early August 2008, MRWA had not carried out any these recommendations.
Councillor Smithson and myself carried out a further survey on 11 August 2008 at the intersection from 6.45am to 8.45 am. 405 vehicles turning right onto Wanneroo Road from Hester Avenue did not stop. Nine vehicles in succession continued to turn right without stopping. Only the traffic travelling north prevented this sequence from continuing
A recent survey of its membership by the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia rated this intersection the second worst in the metropolitan area.
Comment
By reducing the speed limit from 90km/h to 70km/h for one kilometre to the approaches to this intersection would ensure more safety for motorists using these roads during peak hour traffic and also reduce the risk of crashes at this intersection, which continue to occur on a weekly basis.
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. REQUESTS Main Roads WA to lower the speed limit on Wanneroo Road to 70km/h for the section one kilometre either side of the Hester Avenue intersection; and
2. REQUESTS Main Roads WA to undertake the modifications to the Wanneroo Road/Hester Avenue intersection.
Administration Comment
A similar request to lower the speed limit on Wanneroo Road was dealt with by Council in 2007. Petition PT02-12/06 was received by Council at its meeting of 12 December 2006 with a request…“To reduce traffic speed on Wanneroo Road from the Ocean View Tavern to Golf Links Drive Carramar from 90km/h to 80km/h and to install traffic lights at the intersection of Wanneroo Rd and Hester Ave. Also the removal of all trees bushes in the centre island.”
Administration reiterates, that the arbitrary lowering of the speed limit does not lead to automatic compliance. Wanneroo Road at the junction with Hester Avenue is a four lane dual carriageway designed for a 90km/h speed limit.
In response to the referral of the petition to Main Roads WA and responsible Ministers the City received a reply from the Office of the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure. The relevant paragraph reads as follows: "With regard to the speed limit on Wanneroo Road between Wattle Avenue and Menchetti Road, Main Roads undertook a speed limit review on this section of road in late 2006. The recommendation of the review was to retain the 90 km/h speed limit. There has been no significant change at this location to justify a speed change or further review at this time. However, in view of the concerns raised in the petition, I have asked Main Roads to reassess the speed limit in twelve months to reaffirm its appropriateness." To date, the City has not been advised of the outcome of any speed limit review.
The 2003-2007 crash data for Wanneroo Road/Hester Avenue records there were 51 crashes at this site, with five hospitalisations and no fatalities. The majority of crashes reported were property damage only. Rear end crashes in Hester Avenue (inattentive drivers) account for 22 (43%) and right angle crashes in Wanneroo Road account for 25 (49%). In order of crash priority, this intersection ranks 217th of the intersections in the Perth metropolitan area under the control of MRWA.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete