7.00pm, 15 December, 2009
Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Council allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and statement time:
· Questions should only relate to the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or employees.
· Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
· The first priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
· The second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
Deputations
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing, at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A request for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the Friday before the Council Meeting.
· A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
· Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, Electors, Audit Committee and Public Question Time during Council Briefing Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment, except in the case of meetings of the Council where the Council closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the CD plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the State Records Act 2000 (General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records). The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 15 December, 2009 commencing at 7.00pm.
D Blair
Acting Chief Executive Officer
11 December 2009
CONTENTS
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
PQ01-12/09 Mrs A Hine, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-12/09 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 17 November 2009
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
PT01-11/09 Objection to Proposed Amendment 91 to DPS2
PT02-11/09 Requesting Closure of PAW between Tonrita and Crisafulli Avenues, Wanneroo
PS01-12/09 Draft Wetlands Local Planning Policy
PS02-12/09 Residential Development Policy
PS03-12/09 Draft Local Housing Strategy Implementation Policy Framework
Town Planning Scheme & Structure Plans
PS05-12/09 Draft East Wanneroo Structure Plan
PS06-12/09 Adoption of Draft Local Structure Plan No. 78 – Jindalee Coastal Village
PS07-12/09 Dedication of Lot 1002 (1100) Wanneroo Road, Ashby as Pinjar Road Reserve
PS10-12/09 DA09/0112 Proposed Kennel Extensions : Lot 51 (49) Adams Road, Mariginiup
PS12-12/09 Yanchep Boardwalk Update
CB01-12/09 Air-Conditioning for the New Quinns Rocks Fire Station
CB03-12/09 Application to Keep More than Two Dogs
CB04-12/09 Joint Pet Crematorium and Animal Care Facility
CB05-12/09 Safer Suburbs and Wanneroo Townsite CCTV Projects
CB06-12/09 Tender Evaluation for Provision of Community Safety Patrols
IN01-12/09 Tamala Park Coastal Reserve Establishment Plan - Tenure and Management
IN02-12/09 Amendments to the 2009/2010 Foreshore Management Capital Works Program
IN03-12/09 Replacement Caravan for the Driver/Reviver Program
IN04-12/09 Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Safety Improvements Feasibility Study
IN05-12/09 Pinjar Road Realignment/Dual Carriageway – Staging and Funding Project
IN06-12/09 Mirrabooka Avenue Extension - Staging and Funding Program
IN07-12/09 Windsor Road and Lancaster Road Upgrade, Wangara: Budget Variation
IN08-12/09 Pathway Construction on Compass Circle, Yanchep - Budget Variation
IN09-12/09 Tender No. 09035 - The Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Rubber Softfall
IN10-12/09 Parking Prohibitions - Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre Right of Way
IN11-12/09 State Underground Power Program - Round Five
IN12-12/09 Public Guidance In Road Reserves - Policy Review
IN13-12/09 Nature Strip (Verge) Treatment – Protective Devices - Policy Review
CD01-12/09 Community Funding Allocations October 2009
CD02-12/09 Proposed Replacement of Plant 96031 - Mitsubishi Rosa (21-24 Seater Bus)
Corporate Strategy & Performance
CS01-12/09 Warrant of Payments - For the Period to 31 October 2009
CS02-12/09 Audit Plan 2009/2010
CS03-12/09 Financial Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2009
Governance & Executive Services
CS04-12/09 Review of Delegated Authority Register
CS05-12/09 City of Wanneroo Private Property Amendment Local Law 2009
CS06-12/09 Donations to be Considered by Council
CS07-12/09 Quinns Rocks Caravan Park - Renewal of Long Stay Tenancy Agreements - Sites 46 & 60
CS08-12/09 Relocation of Whitford and Districts Model Aircraft Club, Lot 4, Neerabup
CE01-12/09 Delegation of Authority Over the Council Recess
CE02-12/09 Freeway Extension to Neerabup Road and Connection to Neerabup Industrial Area
CE03-12/09 Appointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer
CE04-12/09 Acting Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
MN01-12/09 Mayor Jon Kelly – Kingsway Christian College Speed Zone Review
CR01-12/09 Purchase of Part Lot 8 (68) Pinjar Road, Sinagra for Pinjar Road Reserve
CR02-12/09 Policy - Payments to Employee in Addition to Contract or Award
AGENDA
Question received in writing before the meeting
Question 1 Yanchep Boardwalk Infrastructure.
What is the total cost to date in legal fees?
Question 2 Removal of trees and stumps
How much has it cost Council this year so far for removal of trees and stumps by Geoffs Tree Service?
Question 3 Mayoral commitment to projects
Can the Mayor tell us here today what important projects are unfinished and other commitments to groups he wishes to complete prior to leaving Council? (Whenever)
Question 4 Mayoral car
a) Can the CEO please tell me why it has taken 10 yrs to issue a logbook for the Mayoral car? (I have raised this question many times here in Council and had the same questionable answers.)
b) Why has the Local Govt Act 1995-1996 been ignored or interpreted wrongly? It plainly states, a car provided to a council member “with private use”that a procedure should be put in place so that it enables the full cost of private use be recouped from that member, to include a portion of cost of depreciation, insurance, licencing, servicing and fuel. Has the Local Govt Act been abused for 10 yrs? If so does this call for an inquiry?
Response by Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Question 1
To date, the City has incurred legal expenses of $2,671.02 in relation to the Yanchep Boardwalk.
Question 2
Contract 07036 for the ‘Provision of Tree Maintenance Service’ (two year contract, expires 25 November 2010). Total spent to date this financial year is $248,482.68. However this includes all services under the contract such as street tree pruning, root barrier installation, tree removal and stump grinding etc A breakdown for the tree removal portion is not available.
Question 3
As this question is of a personal nature, in accordance with Regulation 7 ‘Procedures for Question Time for the Public’, there is no compulsion for the Mayor to answer this question.
Question 4
a) In the year 2000 the Council adopted a policy dealing with the Elected Member Allowances and Expenses. Incorporated within this policy was the provision of a fully serviced and maintained Council owned vehicle for the Mayor’s use to the standard of that provided to the Chief Executive Officer and to be replaced as part of the normal vehicle replacement program within the City’s light vehicle fleet. Further to the initial adoption of this policy, the Council has continued to sanction the use of a vehicle for the Mayor at its Special Council Meeting conducted each financial year to adopt the City’s budget.
There has since been advice received from the then Department for Local Government and Regional Development that in accordance with the Regulations, the Department would accept that a local government could provide a motor vehicle owned by it to a council member to use in the performance of their council functions. Nevertheless, if private use were provided, the Department would expect that a procedure would be put in place to enable the cost of the private use to be recouped.
In comparing the practice of providing a mayoral vehicle with a number of other local governments, it was found that policies varied significantly from providing a vehicle without recompense for private use to requiring a logbook to be maintained.
Given the varying interpretations across the industry, the City’s Administration sought legal advice and has now been advised that the existing provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 as amended do not provide for the allocation of a vehicle to a Mayor or Shire President within the State of Western Australia. The City will now liaise with the Department for Local Government to address this issue on a whole of industry basis.
Following confirmation of the legal advice the mayoral vehicle has now been handed back.
b) The statement in the question is actually incorrect. In the absence of legal precedence, legislation is open to interpretation and as such, the City of Wanneroo has acted in good faith and based on industry practice and departmental advice.
Now that the City has taken leadership in this matter and sought independent advice, a clearer interpretation is now available and can be acted upon.
This does not constitute the need for an inquiry but the City will be referring the latest advice to the Department for Local Government to determine an industry solution to the use of Mayoral vehicles across the State of Western Australia.
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 17 November 2009 be confirmed.
Administrative Amendment to the Special Council Meeting held on 26 November 2009
It is noted for Council’s information that an Administrative Amendment has been made to the Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on Monday, 26 November 2009, which were confirmed by Council at its Ordinary meeting on Tuesday, 17 November 2009.
Item SPC02-10/09 has been amended in Clause f of the resolution by replacing the words “Cr Roberts” with “Cr Goodenough”. Cr Goodenough was appointed by Council as Deputy Delegate to the Joondalup Health Campus Community Board of Advice, however the Minutes incorrectly showed Cr Roberts has having been appointed to this position.
Cr Hewer presented a petition of 11 signatures, requesting that Council disallow District Planning Scheme No 2, Amendment 91, Part A, amend the current Special Rural Zoning to decrease the size of the building envelopes from 2000m2 to 600m2, and protect the groves of trees that exist close to Golf Links Drive, Carramar.
The applicants have requested that this matter be put on hold to allow them to provide the City with further information. It is likely that the matter will be reported to the first Council meeting in 2010.
Cr Newton presented a petition of 22 signatures, requesting the closure of the Public Accessway between Tonrita and Crisafulli Avenues, Wanneroo.
UPDATE
Administration is considering the request and will report back to Council in due course.
Cr Goodenough presented a petition of 4,043 signatures, opposing the proposal to reduce the speed limit on Marmion Avenue between Tamala Park and Hughie Edwards Drive, Merriwa from 80kph to 70kph.
UPDATE
A report was considered at Council’s meeting on 17 November 2009. A letter has been sent to Cr Goodenough, as petition organiser, advising of Council’s resolution.
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the A/Chief Executive Officer.
Cr Gray to declare a financial interest in Item PS03-12/09 due to owning property within the area covered by the report.
Cr Mackenzie to declare an impartial interest in Item PS03-12/09 due to jointly owning property within the area covered by the report.
Cr Monks to declare a financial interest in Item PS03-12/09 due to residing within the area covered by the report.
Cr Roberts to declare an impartial interest in Item IN01-12/09 due to being on the Board of the Tamala Park Advisory Committee.
Cr Monks to declare an impartial interest in Item CD01-12/09 due to a family member being a student at Wanneroo Senior High School.
File Ref: S27/0057V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Coordinator Environmental Planning
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider advertising of draft Local Planning Policy 4.1: Wetlands, included as Attachment 1.
Background
In the recent consideration of structure plans located adjacent to wetlands (for example Woodvale Structure Plan No. 64 and East Landsdale Cell 9 Structure Plan No. 57), the community and proponents have consistently raised key issues surrounding wetland buffers and compensation. To address these issues, there is a need for a local planning policy to better incorporate wetland protection, management, and acquisition in local planning decisions.
Detail
Administration has developed a Local Planning Policy Framework (LPPF) (refer Attachment 1). As part of the LPPF, a draft Local Planning Policy 4.1: Wetlands (LPP 4.1) (refer Attachment 2) has been prepared to establish a clear position on how the City will treat wetlands when dealing with various planning proposals. This in turn will greatly contribute to the City’s ability to provide certainty and consistency in decision-making and advice, and will also streamline the planning assessment process for applications where wetlands are involved.
Draft LPP 4.1 is organised into three parts - operational details, general provisions for wetland protection, and specific policy provisions related to particular proposals, for example structure plans and subdivision applications. Draft LPP 4.1 includes a range of key policy provisions that define:
· What does and does not constitute a wetland;
· Protection and management requirements of natural wetlands;
· The required process to re-evaluate the boundary or management category of a natural wetland;
· Potential for compensation for wetland areas in subdivisional proposals;
· Requirements for determination of wetland buffers;
· Public open space entitlements for wetlands and buffers; and
· Minimum requirements of information and management plans for each stage of the planning process.
Two significant policy components of draft LPP 4.1 relate to wetland acquisition and the determination of wetland buffers; these are discussed in greater detail below.
Wetland Acquisition
Under current practice, wetlands in good condition (having a conservation or resource enhancement management category) are required to be ceded to the Crown at no cost in subdivisional processes. This results in significant inequality; where a landholder has managed the environmental values of a wetland they are given no reward, whereas a wetland degraded over time can be developed or included in public open space. Current practice also does not recognise that in a development area, all landholders and the community benefit from the environmental and niche recreational benefits provided by wetland retention.
Draft LPP 4.1 introduces provisions that enable acquisition of conservation category and resource enhancement wetlands and their associated buffers, where such cost is factored into a developer contribution arrangement managed under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). The use of a developer contribution arrangement would spread the cost of acquiring the wetland area over all landholders in a structure plan area, and provide greater equality and therefore incentive to manage wetlands for their conservation value.
Draft LPP 4.1 presents a framework by which landholders with wetlands identified through structure planning as requiring protection can have that land acquired at a rate of 20 percent of the equivalent area of unencumbered, developable land. This proposed rate recognises the lesser market value of wetlands compared to developable land and manages the cost to other developers to ensure development remains feasible, whilst providing a sufficient level of financial return to the affected owner of the wetland area. The policy also provides for inclusion of management plans and monitoring as a shared cost in developer contribution arrangements, so a single landholder is not financially responsible for the work on behalf of the entire development area.
Wetland Buffers
Significant confusion currently exists with regard to the determination of wetland buffers, with alternative approaches taken by State agencies and local governments. Draft LPP 4.1 introduces a standardised framework for the determination of wetland buffers, based on the current physical state of the wetland and upland environment, and the potential impacts of the proposed development.
A key innovation of draft LPP 4.1 is the definition of two distinct wetland buffer types – natural wetland buffers and compatible-use wetland buffers. The distinction recognises those instances where the area adjacent to a wetland is in a completely degraded state, and provision of a wetland buffer alone will not protect the wetland. In such areas there is no environmental justification to exclude low-impact uses from the area and emphasis on specific management techniques is required rather than separation distances. In all instances, the ultimate objective is the protection of the wetland.
Draft LPP 4.1 provides for site-specific determination of natural wetland buffers where a wetland and associated upland vegetation is in its natural state. Where the area is degraded, a more appropriate alternative buffer, in the form of a “compatible use wetland buffer”, can be considered.
Whilst a separation distance from impacting development is retained, in this situation, the degraded “buffer” does not provide any wetland protection or management function, and alternative techniques, including water sensitive urban design, native vegetation screening, and irrigation and fertiliser management, are to be provided.
Where alternative management techniques demonstrate that the existing values of the wetland will be enhanced, “compatible-use wetland buffers” will allow low-impact uses such as permeable car-parking, recreational use, water sensitive urban design structures, and amenity landscaping to provide multiple functionality of the buffer to enhance environmental outcomes and community enjoyment of the area.
Consultation
The Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC) considered Draft LPP 4.1 at its meeting of 7 October 2009 and resolved unanimously:
“That the Environmental Advisory Committee provide COMMENT on the draft Wetlands Local Planning Policy to the Director Planning and Sustainability by 16 October 2009, following which time the draft Policy, incorporating any modifications deemed appropriate by administration, be REFERRED to Council for consent to advertise the draft Policy for public comment over a four week period.”
One comment was received by a member of the EAC, resulting in a modification being made to the draft policy. The EAC will be invited to comment further on the draft policy following the close of the required advertising period.
The draft policy was also recently presented to the Council Forum on 24 November 2009 for discussion, prior to formal consideration by Council.
If agreed by Council, draft LPP 4.1 will be advertised for four weeks by way of placing advertisements in local newspapers and the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of Clause 8.11 of DPS 2. Submissions received during advertising will be summarised and referred to Council for consideration in the finalisation of the policy.
Comment
Draft LPP 4.1 will provide a certain and consistent approach to wetland protection and management in planning decisions. Importantly, it will address the issues of land acquisition and buffers, which have been difficult to address and resolve in the past.
Draft LPP 4.1 provides a pragmatic approach that will result in the protection and enhancement of wetlands through specific requirements for water sensitive urban design and water quality outcomes.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Section 8.11 of DPS2, Council may resolve to prepare and adopt a local planning policy to apply to any matter related to planning and development of the district. A draft policy must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days, after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submission received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
Implementation of draft LPP 4.1 will contribute to the objectives of the Environmental Pillar of Council’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021.
Policy Implications
Draft LPP 4.1 will contribute to the implementation of Council’s Local Environmental Plan 2009-2014, particularly Objective 3.1 – Achieve development in tune with the local environment.
The draft Policy will guide protection and management of wetlands and buffers in planning applications and decisions, where no such guidance presently exists.
Financial Implications
The cost of advertising the draft policy is estimated to be $500, which can be met from existing operational budgets.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council, pursuant to Section 8.11 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADVERTISES draft Local Planning Policy 4.1: Wetlands, as contained in Attachment 2, for public comment for a period of four weeks, by way of:
1. An advertisement in local newspapers for two consecutive weeks; and
2. Display on the City’s website.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S27/0097V01
File Name: AA Residential Development Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: K Evans
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments 1
Issue
To consider draft Local Planning Policy 1.1 : Residential Development for public advertising. The draft policy will guide the assessment and determination of proposals for residential development involving the application of Performance Criteria of the Residential Design Codes (R-Codes).
Background
The R-Codes provide a basis for the control of residential development. They include Acceptable Development (deemed-to-comply) provisions, while also providing an alternative path for proposals to instead meet related Performance Criteria.
District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) requires that planning approval or codes variation approval (in the form of that required for a building licence application) be obtained for residential development that involves the exercise of discretion to vary the provisions of the R-Codes, which includes proposals requiring assessment against Performance Criteria.
Whereas Acceptable Development provisions are mostly definitive and clear, Performance Criteria are relatively unquantifiable and are based on the achievement of broad objectives, rather than compliance with specific standards. Assessment of a proposal against Performance Criteria usually involves subjective analysis, as the criteria are open to wide interpretation and are therefore prone to complexity and inconsistency in approach.
In the absence of clear interpretational guidance, assessment of proposals against Performance Criteria can be both difficult and resource-consuming. The R-Codes provide that local policies may be prepared which augment the Codes by providing additional criteria and provisions for any aspect of residential development that is not provided for in the Codes. A draft local planning policy has been prepared for Council’s consideration to address this matter.
Detail
The draft policy provides a framework for the assessment and determination of proposals seeking assessment under the R-Codes Performance Criteria (refer Attachment 1).
The draft policy provides interpretational standards for the Performance Criteria that most commonly arise in the City and which can often present assessment difficulties. These include criteria for:
· the setback of carports within the front setback area (Clause 6.2.3)
· the extent of the frontage and building façade occupied by garages (Clause 6.2.8)
· building on the boundary (Clause 6.3.2)
· building height (Clause 6.7.1)
· Outbuildings (Clause 6.10.1)
· External fixtures (6.10.2)
· Essential facilities (6.10.3)
The draft policy is divided into three columns:
Column A – Performance Criteria; as per the R-Codes
Column B – Standards that will be approved without advertising; and
Column C – Unacceptable Development Standards.
The policy operates as follows:
· Proposals complying with Acceptable Development provisions and the standards listed in Column B will be approved without advertising for public comment;
· Proposals that meet any of the standards in Column C will be refused; and
· Proposals that are beyond the standards listed in Column B but not deemed unacceptable in Column C will be advertised for public comment and determined on their merit.
Comment
The draft policy is specifically intended to generate the following procedural improvements:
· More definitive guidance for staff, proponents, landowners and Elected Members in the assessment of residential development proposals involving application of R-Codes Performance Criteria and therefore greater certainty and consistency indecision-making and advice;
· Improved ease of assessment and reduced operational demands in assessment and reporting for staff;
· Increased applicant (particularly building company) awareness of the City’s standards to fulfil particular Performance Criteria;
· More timely determinations; and
· Reducing the need for such applications to be determined by Council.
Consultation
It is necessary to advertise the draft policy for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days. Advertising is proposed to be undertaken in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of DPS 2:
· Advertisement in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks;
· Display on the City’s website; and
· Referral in writing to major builders operating in the City.
The draft policy was also recently presented to the Council Forum on 1 December 2009 for discussion, prior to formal consideration by Council.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of DPS 2, Council may resolve to prepare and adopt a local planning policy to apply to any matter related to planning and development of the district. A draft policy must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The draft policy is consistent with the following relevant objectives of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021.
“Objective 1.5
Improve the physical quality of the built environment
Objective 4.4
Improve business performance and the quality of service delivery”
Policy Implications
Draft LPP 1.1 will establish agreed standards for the assessment and determination of applications for Planning Approval and applications requiring the exercise of Performance Criteria under the Residential Design Codes (Variation 1), where no such guidance currently exists.
Financial Implications
The costs of advertising the draft policy are estimated to be $500, which can be met from the Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council pursuant to Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADVERTISES draft Local Planning Policy1.1 : Residential Development, as contained in Attachment 1, for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days, by way of:
1. Advertisements in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks;
2. Display on the City’s website; and
3. Referral in writing to major builders operating in the City.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S41/0010V02
File Name: AA Draft Local Housing Strategy Implementation Policy.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: M Wright
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the advertising of draft Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing Strategy Implementation, included as Attachment 1. The draft policy will establish a framework for implementing the Local Housing Strategy (LHS) recommendations for land identified for increased residential density within the City of Wanneroo. Draft LPP 3.1 forms an integral part of the City’s Local Planning Policy Framework, which is illustrated in Attachment 2.
Background
Council resolved to approve the LHS at its meeting of 1 November 2005 (Item GS02-11/05 refers).
Central to the LHS, and upon which most community interest is focused, are the recommendations that relate to increases in residential density. For density increases to come into effect, amendments need to be made to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and in some instances other planning requirements, such as upgrades to infrastructure, may need to be addressed.
It is beyond the capacity of Administration to simultaneously undertake the tasks involved in preparing and progressing amendment proposals and other associated requirements for all areas identified by the LHS for increased residential densities. It is therefore proposed that Council adopt a policy framework to enable the implementation of the LHS.
Detail
Need for an Implementation Framework
The LHS recommendations require considerable resources and a high degree of coordination to implement. Initiating Scheme amendments to increase residential densities for parts of the City will be a substantial exercise. In addition, all of the areas recommended for density increases have significant coordination or infrastructure-related issues that must firstly be addressed.
Administration cannot undertake all of this work at once and it is therefore necessary to set priorities to enable the required work to be programmed. It is also necessary to define the process and requirements by which landowners could progress LHS recommendations ahead of the City doing this work. The Draft Policy is focused on these areas.
There are three key aspects to Part 1 of the draft Policy, which are:
· The identification of relevant planning matters for each precinct;
· The allocation of priorities for City initiated density increases based on a consistent and transparent approach; and
· The establishment of a framework for preparation and consideration of landowner-initiated recodings (density increases).
These key aspects are discussed in the following sections.
Identification of Relevant Planning Matters for Each Precinct
The draft Policy arranges all land identified for a density increase into district housing precincts, for which an amendment will be required to DPS 2 to effect the higher density codings identified in the LHS. Planning requirements also need to be addressed, such as infrastructure upgrades and/or design guidelines for redevelopment.
The LHS Implementation Table within the Draft Policy identifies the relevant planning matters that need to be addressed in each housing precinct, prior to development occurring at the increased density.
The Draft Policy stipulates that the Housing Precincts identified are the smallest geographical area that will be considered for recoding. This is recommended, as if Council is to allow smaller-scaled recoding proposals to proceed, this will only further add to the number of amendments needed and time taken to fully implement the LHS recommendations. It is also recommended to allow better coordination of the planning process and resulting development.
Framework for Council to Determine Priority Areas for Implementation
Due to the large number of properties identified under the LHS as suitable for increased density, it is not practical for all of the recommendations to be implemented simultaneously. The draft policy provides Council with the opportunity to determine priority areas for implementation. The priorities for implementation in the Policy have been determined on strategic impact/importance – that is, the location of the precinct in relation to local facilities, the number of potential dwellings that may result from recoding and the condition of existing housing stock.
The principle is that the precincts in which it is envisaged will achieve the greatest strategic impact will be given highest priority. The order of priority appears in the “Priority for Implementation” column in the LHS Implementation Table appearing on page 4 of the Policy.
Importantly, it must be noted that the priorities for implementation contained in the draft Policy are priorities for Administration to progress on a sequential basis, as resources permit. These priorities do not prevent landowners or developers from submitting recoding proposals and addressing relevant planning requirements in the meantime.
The Establishment of a Framework for Landowner-Initiated Town Planning Scheme Amendments
There is considerable landowner interest in the recommendations of the LHS, particularly where land is identified for increased density. A landowner may wait for the City to undertake the planning tasks necessary to progress the Scheme amendments or, alternatively, may opt to pursue the recoding themself.
The Draft Policy identifies the following circumstances where landowner-initiated Scheme amendments would be appropriate:
· Where the area to be recoded is not geographically smaller than the Housing Precincts identified in the Policy;
· Where the proposed density increase is consistent with the LHS;
· Where all relevant planning matters identified in the Policy Table have been adequately addressed;
· Where the existing infrastructure is capable of supporting the ultimate development as identified by the LHS.
The Draft Policy stipulates that all of the above criteria need to be satisfied for a landowner initiated recoding to be progressed through normal statutory processes. This is consistent with all planning processes undertaken across the City and recognises the considerable resources required.
Once initiated, Administration is required to actively progress DPS 2 amendments through normal statutory processes, including referral to the Environmental Protection Authority and advertising to affected landowners and relevant government agencies for a period of not less than 42 days.
Comment
The draft policy outlines the approach to be taken in implementing the LHS recommended density increases and sets a framework that provides an appropriate means of achieving the aims and objectives of the Strategy.
It should however, be noted that a Residential Planning Study was undertaken in 2003 for Quinns Rocks, which recommended increases in residential density to the original Quinns Rocks Township. The draft Policy complies with this earlier work by basing its Quinns Rocks Housing Precinct on the same area identified through the earlier Study. The residential density of the subject area has however been increased from R17.5, R20 and R20/30 to R40 and R60 to reflect contemporary planning that generally supports a higher level of residential density than what was previously proposed.
Consultation
The draft policy was recently presented to the Council Forum on 24 November 2009 for discussion, prior to formal consideration by Council. If agreed by Council, SPP 3.1 will need to be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days. Advertising is proposed to be undertaken in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of DPS 2:
1. Advertisement in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks; and
2. Display on the City’s website.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of DPS 2, Council may resolve to prepare and adopt a local planning policy to apply to any matter related to planning and development of the district. A draft policy must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days, after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The draft policy is consistent with the following relevant objectives of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021.
“Objective 1.5
Improve the physical quality of the built environment.”
Policy Implications
Draft LPP 3.1 will establish a clear and consistent framework for implementing the LHS recommendations for increased residential densities, where no such framework currently exists.
Financial Implications
The cost of advertising the draft policy is estimated to be $500, which can be met from existing operational budgets.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council pursuant to Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADVERTISES draft Local Planning Policy 3.1 : Local Housing Strategy Implementation, as contained in Attachment 1, for public comment for a period of four weeks, by way of:
1. An advertisement in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks; and
2. Display on the City’s website.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
Town Planning Scheme & Structure Plans
File Ref: TPS/0100V01 & SP/0019/08V01
File Name: BA Amendment.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Joseph Coppola
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider adoption of Amendment No. 100 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and Amendment No. 8 to the City of Wanneroo’s Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 21B for Carramar South/Tapping North (LSP 21B).
Applicant |
Development Planning Strategies |
Owner |
Peet Ltd |
Location |
Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent, Tapping |
Site Area |
1522m2 |
DPS2 Zoning |
Centre |
DPS2 R-Coding |
R20 |
SP 21B Zoning |
Centre |
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
Background
The site is currently zoned ‘Centre’ under DPS 2 and LSP 21B. In April 2009, a proposal was submitted to amend DPS 2 to rezone the subject lot to Residential R20. Council at its meeting of 28 July 2009 considered that proposal and resolved to initiate the amendments as follows (Refer to item PS02-07/09):
“1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 100 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) Rezone Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent, Tapping from ‘Centre’ Zone to ‘Residential R20’ Zone, as shown on Attachment 3 of this report; and
b) Amend Schedule 3 of the Scheme Text by deleting the centre described as “Tapping Portion of Lot 9018 (NE6) 200m2 NLA”.
2. REFERS Amendment No. 100 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. Should the EPA advise that the amendment does not require assessment, ADVERTISE the amendment for a period of 42 days;
3. FORWARDS a copy of Amendment No. 100 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission;
4. Pursuant to Clause 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 DETERMINES that proposed Amendment No. 8 to the Carramar South/Tapping North Agreed Structure Plan No. 21B, submitted by Development Planning Strategies is satisfactory, for the purpose of:
a) Amending Schedule 1 within Clause 3.1 of the Structure Plan text, to delete the centre described as “NE6 Local Centre’; and
b) Amending the Structure Plan Map to rezone Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent, Tapping from ‘Centre’ to ‘Residential R20’;
and ADVERTISES the amendment for a period of 28 days.”
Detail
Site
The subject site is vacant, has an area of 1522m2 and is located on the corner of St. Stephens Crescent and Waldburg Drive, Tapping. A plan showing the location of the subject site is included as Attachment 1. The site abuts residential development coded R20 to the south and west, with Tapping Primary School located to the north of the subject site, on the opposite side of St. Stephens Crescent.
Proposal
The proposal seeks to amend DPS 2 and LSP 21B, by rezoning Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent from ‘Centre’ Zone to ‘Residential R20’ Zone (refer Attachment 2). The owner of the subject lot anticipates subdividing the subject site into three residential lots of approximately 500m2 each. The applicant’s concept subdivision plan is included as Attachment 3.
Consultation
The Amendment to DPS 2 and LSP 21B was advertised for a 42-day public advertising period between 1 September 2009 and 13 October 2009. For both amendments comments were sought by way of an on site sign, an advertisement in the local newspaper and the City’s website and letters to affected and nearby landowners.
During the advertising period, Administration received no comments of objection for the proposed amendments. The only submissions made were two comments of ‘no objection’ received from public authorities.
Comment
Response to the Submissions
As the City did not receive any comment of objection, it is considered that the subject DPS 2 and LSP 21B Amendments should proceed without modification.
Statutory Compliance
The scheme amendment will follow the statutory process outlined in the Town Planning Regulations, while the proposed Local Structure Plan amendment will follow the process prescribed by Part 9 of the District Planning Scheme.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006-2021:
“3.1 Increase availability of serviced commercial and industrial land”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 ADOPTS Amendment No. 100 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) to:
a) Rezone Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent, Tapping from ‘Centre’ Zone to ‘Residential R20’ Zone, as shown on Attachment 2 of this report; and
b) Amend Schedule 3 of the Scheme Text by deleting the centre described as “Tapping Portion of Lot 9018 (NE6) 200m2 NLA”.
2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (a) (g) AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the amendment documentation;
3. FORWARDS the amendment documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration REQUESTING the Hon Minister for Planning grant final approval to the amendment;
4. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on this Scheme amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision;
5. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 8 to the Carramar South/Tapping North Agreed Structure Plan No. 21B to rezone Lot 1334 (106) St. Stephens Crescent, Tapping, from Centre to Residential (R20) as shown on Attachment 2 of this report is satisfactory and SUBMITS three copies of the Structure Plan document to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification;
6. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the Structure Plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
7. ENDORSES the comments made in this report regarding the submissions received on this Structure Plan amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S27/0081V02
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: P Thompson
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 7
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the draft East Wanneroo Structure Plan (EWSP), recently released by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for public comment.
Background
‘Future of East Wanneroo’ (FOEW) Report
In August 2007, the WAPC released “The Future of East Wanneroo” report. This included a number of ‘recommended actions’, including the following, which the draft EWSP attempts to respond to:
“3. That DPI undertake the following work as a priority.
a) Define a sustainable future urban structure and form for east Wanneroo, together with future road and public transport networks and strategies, activity centres and corridors, population targets and the nature of employment opportunities.
b) Integrate the east Wanneroo area in the context of broader strategic planning for the north-west corridor particularly in relation to transport planning, infrastructure and commercial/employment centres.
c) Integrate the broader strategic planning for east Wanneroo with the context of the Gnangara sustainability strategy and the strategic considerations for regional transport corridors and future land use options for abutting portions of State Forest 65.
d) Provide an implementation process and outline further studies required to support a future MRS amendment from rural to urban deferred for identified areas.”
The FOEW Report also included a land use concept plan, which the report recommended “be used as the broad framework for future land use planning by local and State government agencies for the east Wanneroo area”.
The land use concept plan is included as Figure 2 in the draft EWSP.
Council considered the FOEW report at its meeting of 11 December 2007 (item PD01-12/07) and resolved as follows:
“1. ENDORSES the process shown in Attachment No 5 prepared by Administration to progress planning of the area east of the existing East Wanneroo urban areas.
2. NOTES that Administration will proceed to undertake further detailed local planning of the rural areas north of Flynn Drive, with a view of this providing a basis for the preparation of a final Local Rural Strategy for the City, which will be the subject of a budget submission to Council in due course and this work will need to dove-tail with related elements of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy study.
3. DETERMINES that it will not support any independent planning proposals, including rezoning proposals associated with rural small lot subdivision, which may be viewed as premature in relation to the planning process adopted under 1 above, and the further detailed local planning to be undertaken under 2 above.
4. REQUIRES the Director Planning and Development, in regard to any planning proposal within the Study Area defined in Figure 1 of the August 2007 report titled “The Future of East Wanneroo”:
(a) only to accept the proposal for consideration by Council if the Director is satisfied that the proposal is not premature having regard to the stage reached in the planning processes generally for this area and particularly having regard to the process referred to in 1 and 2 above; but provided that:
(i) this requirement is not intended to inhibit the processing by the WAPC of any application for subdivision approval in proper form, and is not intended to inhibit the processing by the City of an application for approval to commence development in proper form. Such applications should be considered on their individual merit, which would still include amongst other things, consideration of whether approval of the proposal at that time would:
· be desirable from a planning point of view having regard to the status of the planning processes referred to in 1 and 2 above;
· be consistent with the principles of orderly and proper planning; and
· impact on the amenity of the locality in the short, medium and long term.
(b) to reject the proposal if it incorporates a Structure Plan which has not been required by the Council pursuant to clause 9.1.1 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
5. REQUESTS the Chief Executive Officer meet with appropriate representatives of the Western Australian Planning Commission and Department of Planning and Infrastructure to reinforce the importance of undertaking the implementation actions set out in chapters six and seven of the ‘Future of East Wanneroo’ report in a timely manner.
6. OFFERS to help establish a joint technical advisory group comprising representatives of the City Administration and relevant State Government agencies to ensure the implementation actions outlined in chapters six and seven of the ‘Future of East Wanneroo’ report are undertaken in a timely manner.
7. WRITES TO THE Department of Planning and Infrastructure advising that it will not be in a position to adopt any structure plans or support subdivision projects that may result from the implementation of the East Wanneroo Land Use Concept Plan that do not adequately address employment and economic development issues.”
In relation to the planning process endorsed by Council under point 1 of the above resolution, it should be noted that that process included a step following the undertaking of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy study, which involved the preparation by the WAPC of Network City-related guidance, including a broad urban concept plan. The draft EWSP can be seen as being consistent with this early part of the process.
Directions 2031
“Directions 2031: Draft Spatial Framework for Perth and Peel” was released for public comment by the WAPC in June of this year. Council considered this document at its meeting of 25 August 2009 (item PS05-08/09).
Directions 2031 identified the East Wanneroo area as ‘under investigation’ for possible future residential use (note that for the purpose of this Administration report to Council, the term ‘East Wanneroo’ is used to refer to the southern part of the City’s rural area which is subject to the proposals of the draft EWSP). The draft EWSP can be seen as being that investigation.
It was also noted in the report to Council on Directions 2031 that there was a contradiction evident in Directions 2031, in that while it identified East Wanneroo as indicated above, it also proposed that all future residential development up until 2031 should only occur on land which is already zoned for urban purposes. Council’s resolution on Directions 2031 recommended (among other things) that the WAPC address this contradiction in the preparation of the final Directions 2031 document, which is expected to be released around March 2010.
Draft Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (GSS)
The draft GSS was released for public comment by the State government in July of this year. It was also considered by Council at its meeting of 25 August 2009 (item PS07-08/09).
The preparation of the GSS was another one of the recommendations of the FOEW report and, as noted above, it was also recommended that DPI integrate the planning for the East Wanneroo area with the context of the GSS.
The draft GSS included a plan showing possible future land use and this is included as Figure 5 in the draft EWSP. The final GSS is expected to be released around April of next year.
Detail
The draft EWSP was released by the WAPC on 2 November 2009 for a public comment period concluding on 16 December 2009.
A copy of the draft EWSP has been provided to each Elected Member.
The key plans included in the draft EWSP are:
Figure 11: Structure Plan (refer Attachment 1);
Figure 13: Implementation Guide for the East Wanneroo Structure Plan (refer Attachment 2).
Figure 13 is particularly important as the related text states: “The area indicated as urban is deemed appropriate for development”.
The main elements of the draft plan include:
· New urban areas to accommodate around 24,000 dwellings at a gross residential density of 15 dwellings per hectare (as per Directions 2031 proposal). It should be noted, however, that the urban area is not intended to be solely residential land use, but also other uses such as light industrial, recreation and commercial.
· Rural areas to include agricultural and rural-residential uses. The north-eastern rural area comprises land which is currently State Forest land, and this is also identified for ‘investigation for employment purposes’, the focus being on agricultural uses (not industrial uses).
· The proposed ‘South Pinjar’ industrial area, to the north of Neaves Road and east of Neerabup Industrial Area.
· Parks and Recreation reserves which mainly comprise the main wetland areas and some Bush Forever Sites – BFS.
· ‘Ecological linkages’, which reflect similar proposals under the draft Gnangara Sustainability Strategy.
· ‘Priority local natural areas’, many of which are scattered through the proposed urban areas. These are proposed to be protected.
· A proposed north-south Primary Road intended to link Tonkin Highway in the south to either Flynn Drive or Old Yanchep Road in the north.
· A network of proposed ‘other regional roads’ and ‘district roads’.
· A proposed new district centre and ten proposed neighbourhood and local centres.
· Three proposed public high school sites.
In terms of the proposed implementation process, this is summarised in Diagram 1 of the draft (refer Attachment 3).
Consultation
The Department of Planning (DOP) has advertised the draft by placing small notices in the West Australian and local community newspapers, and through its website.
Administration is also aware that the Member for Wanneroo has written to some landowners in the area, making them aware of the draft. However, Administration understands that the DOP has not itself written to any affected landowners within the draft structure plan area. Furthermore, the DOP has not (and is not intending to) hold any public information sessions to address landowners on the draft structure plan.
The City has obtained copies of the draft structure plan document and these have been made available to the public at reception.
Comment
Comparison with FOEW Land Use Concept Plan
The following are some of the main ways in which the draft EWSP map shown in Attachment 2 differs from the land use concept plan proposed by the FOEW Report (which is Figure 2 in the draft EWSP):
· It shows additional ‘urban’ areas immediately south of Neaves Road, and also where the existing Special Rural Zones are generally located within the proposed urban areas.
· It shows the area in the vicinity of the Lakelands golf course at Gnangara as rural rather than possible urban.
· It shows the State forest area generally to the north east of Lake Jandabup as rural and ‘investigation for employment purposes’, rather than remaining State forest.
· It shows the proposed ‘South Pinjar’ industrial area, north of Neaves Road.
In respect to the eastern edge of the urban area as proposed by the FOEW plan, it should be noted that that plan clarified that the zoning of that eastern area was ‘subject to future planning and outcomes of the East Wanneroo Road Network Study and the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy’.
Comparison with Draft GSS Plan
The following are some of the main ways in which the draft EWSP map shown in Attachment 2 differs from the draft GSS plan (which is Figure 5 in the draft EWSP):
· It shows the existing Special Rural Area zoned land as being urban, rather than remaining Special Rural.
· It shows the State forest area generally located to the north east of Lake Jandabup as rural and ‘investigation for employment purposes’, rather than urban.
· It shows the area generally in the vicinity of Golfview Place and Lakelands golf course as rural, rather than urban.
· It shows the industrial area to the north of Neaves Road (‘South Pinjar’) extending further east.
Proposed comments for Submission on the Draft EWSP
Attachment 4 includes Administration comments on a number of the draft EWSP proposals. These comments are recommended for submission to the WAPC.
Key points included in the comments are:
· Need for acknowledgement by WAPC that a number of significant issues (e.g. Carnabys Cockatoo and preparation of a regional water management strategy, properly addressing acid sulphate soils and related issues) still need to be properly addressed before landowners should be given firm expectations regarding the likely future zoning of their land.
· Many of the above issues relate to areas of State responsibility and there should not be any attempt to place the onus for progressing the planning of this area on the City until the State has properly addressed those matters. The proposed planning and implementation process needs to be fully developed, setting out who is to prepare what and by when.
· Proposed regional roads intended to pass through existing residential areas (e.g. western part of Elliot Road) could have significant implications for existing properties.
· Mechanisms for protection of the ‘ecological linkages’ and ‘priority local natural areas’, which the draft appears to be largely making the responsibility of the City, need further consideration.
· The draft plan is based on draft Directions 2031 and therefore has only a 20 year planning horizon. It is therefore short-sighted and does not consider longer term possibilities as have been raised in the City’s submission on draft Directions 2031 and the draft Gnangara Sustainability Strategy.
Comment on Consultation
The consultation process undertaken by the Department of Planning (DOP) in the advertising of the draft EWSP has been inadequate. The advertisements placed in the newspapers were small and in places where they would not have been seen by most people. The copies of the structure plan report were only made available to the City and the public about two and a half weeks after the commencement of the comment period, and the comment period itself is ridiculously short considering the significance of the proposal and the number of properties affected. It is likely that many landowners will not have the opportunity to lodge meaningful submissions (if at all) on the draft plan during the consultation process.
Administration recommended to DOP that it write to all landowners in the area and hold a public information meeting, however, neither has occurred.
As a direct result of this poor consultation exercise, the City has received countless enquiries from affected landowners (some even referred by DOP staff), seeking information on the draft structure plan and indicating their high expectations for imminent urbanisation of the area.
It is recommended that Council express its strong concern to the WAPC on this matter.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The draft EWSP has important implications for all of the outcomes sought under the City’s Strategic Plan, and especially for the following objectives of the plan:
“Objective 1.1: improving conservation of local biodiversity
Objective 1.2: minimising use of water
Objective 2.5: improving transport options and connections
Objective 3.2: improving the viability and profile of rural industry
Objective 4.1: improving strategic partnerships
Objective 4.2: improving community engagement
Objective 4.5: improving long-term financial viability”
Policy Implications
The City’s Smart Growth Local Planning Policy requires that sustainability related considerations be properly taken into account.
Financial Implications
Plans involving change of use of a large rural area to urban has significant financial implications for the City, particularly in relation to provision of infrastructure and services which will be required by these future urban communities. The preparation of the plans themselves, where not able to be undertaken by developers, can also be costly.
This will need to be addressed through preparation of developer contribution plans for these areas.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the comments contained in Attachment 4 as the basis for the City’s submission to the Western Australian Planning Commission on the East Wanneroo Structure Plan; and
2. NOTES the Mayor has already addressed the Council’s concerns to the Hon. Minister for Planning on the consultation strategy and lack of information by the Department of Planning.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
East Wanneroo Structure Plan (EWSP)
ATTACHMENT 4 15 Pages
Draft for Public Comment
City of Wanneroo Comments
No. |
EWSP Proposal |
Comment |
|
Major Issues |
|
1. |
That the EWSP use the same ‘planning horizon’ as Directions 2031 i.e. 2031. |
The City’s submissions on Directions 2031 and the draft Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (GSS) argued that these plans needed to look well beyond the next 20 years and be more visionary. The submissions took such a long term approach, leading to proposals for significant eastern urban expansion, so far east as Ellenbrook, served by several new railway lines. (Attachment 5 shows the City’s plan, which was included in its submission on Directions 2031).
Short-term, incremental planning tends not to allow such major infrastructure projects to be properly considered. The result is development of areas in a manner that makes no provision for such future possibilities, such that in the longer term, should the need for the infrastructure be recognised, it is either impractical or extremely costly and disruptive to provide.
The relevant State agencies will presumably be considering the City’s submissions on this matter in the course of finalising Directions 2031 and the GSS. Prior to this matter being decided upon in the context of those studies, the longer term proposals in those submissions relevant to this area are again advocated.
|
2. |
That, notwithstanding the 2031 planning horizon for this plan, the East Wanneroo area be planned on the basis of being the long term urban ‘edge’ to this part of the metropolitan urban area. |
The City’s submissions on Directions 2031 and the draft GSS presented reasons why urban growth should extend eastward to Ellenbrook. Those reasons are still considered valid. Note that the City’s submissions were focussing on long term planning, and that in the shorter term, parts of East Wanneroo could still accommodate horticulture, prior to being able to be replaced by new horticultural areas in Carrabooda.
|
3. |
Inclusion of Carnabys Black Cockatoo foraging habitat and graceful sun moth habitat in proposed urban zoned areas, without resolution or consideration of obligations for protection of foraging habitat under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
|
A significant portion of the remaining native vegetation within the structure plan area is likely foraging habitat for Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo, which is listed as endangered under the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, making it a matter of national environmental significance. The prioritisation of natural assets for protection, however, does not appear to recognise this; with local and regional assets not providing foraging habitat for the species being formally protected and limited attention to Federal obligations for protection of a threatened species.
Proposed retention of environmental attributes includes:
Areas currently designated as “Bush Forever”, currently a non-statutory tool to protect only 10 percent of natural areas across the Perth Metropolitan Region, are generally identified as Parks and Recreation. This predominantly includes wetlands, of regional (not national) significance, which do not form foraging habitat for Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo. Only a few pockets of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat is retained as Parks and Recreation.
The Structure Plan identifies “priority local natural areas” (336 hectares) and includes policy statements that these should be protected as part of local structure planning. However, a significant portion of “priority local natural areas” includes wetland vegetation, not Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat.
422 hectares of “other” native vegetation, assumed to not be in as good condition as the above, is included within various zones of the structure plan with no effective policy statements regarding its protection. It is noted that the 422 hectares is likely Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat; the nature of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging behaviour is that vegetation in less than good condition still provides significant foraging habitat (vegetation condition is based greatly on understorey species, however it is the overstorey species that provide foraging habitat).
Whilst not all the 422 hectares of “other” native vegetation falls within the urban depicted land within the structure plan, a significant portion does. The potential urban zoning of foraging habitat for a Federally listed endangered species must be further debated to determine whether such action is appropriate.
It is noted that wetlands may provide a water source for Carnaby’s, however this submission recognises that declining foraging and breeding habitat, defined as critical habitat by the Significant Impact guidelines 1.1 – Matters of National Environmental Significant (Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2006), are primary contributors to the decline of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo.
The structure plan appears to be based on a premise that removal of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat can be negotiated with the Federal Government under the EPBC Act and offset by revegetation/purchase elsewhere. This would give a level of false certainty to landholders; no such negotiation /agreement has been undertaken/reached and the position of the Federal Government is that vegetation should be retained rather than offset.
Further, when considering the extent of existing approved development and the impact on the Cockatoo, the appropriateness of zoning the remaining critical habitat in 2009 should be properly considered by the State Government in terms of social and environmental responsibility. The significant revegetation/purchase required to offset approved urban and industrial development in the City, and also the removal of pine plantations as part of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy, would significantly limit the availability of any offset options for the removal of habitat in East Wanneroo.
Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo is in decline based on existing habitat availability. Attachment 6 shows the estimated current Carnaby’s Cockatoo habitat derived from aerial photographs and vegetation mapping. Attachment 7 shows an estimate of the habitat that would remain following implementation of approved structure plans and the recommendations of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy to remove the pine plantations. This shows that a significant area of foraging habitat would be lost. Any further loss of foraging habitat in the area could be easily considered to be of too high a risk to the species. As such, the structure plan should not assume that any loss of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat would be entertained by the Federal Government, and these areas should be either removed from the urban zone, or identified as subject to further planning as they cannot at this point in time be, in any way, considered “appropriate for development” (page 35). Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat should be clearly mapped as a constraint in the East Wanneroo area, so that landholders are aware that there is no presumption that their land may be developed for urban development.
An alternative, and more socially and environmentally responsible, option would be to expand the urban zone into the State Forest areas, where plantations will be removed as part of the GSS. Proceeds from development could be utilized by the State to purchase and protect landholdings with Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo foraging habitat, as those landholders should be financially recognized and compensated for retaining the last private pockets of Carnaby’s foraging habitat in the region. Those areas of Carnaby’s foraging habitat that have been developed for Special Rural uses should remain as such; existing controls under the City’s District Planning Scheme provide protection of native vegetation.
|
4. |
Identification of Ecological Linkages without indication of their form or function.
|
Ecological linkages are depicted on the structure plan map, and a number of policy principles included to provide for their identification and protection. However, the form of the linkages is not provided.
Some research has indicated that ecological linkages should be 500 metre vegetated corridors. Other information suggests that “stepping stones” are appropriate. If the structure plan is going to introduce ecological linkages, then the expected form of them across the various zones of the plan must also be provided.
The structure plan currently defers the responsibility to determine the form and financial implications of ecological linkages to local government. This is not supported, as without guidance within the structure plan, the City cannot determine if the linkages are to be 500 metre corridors, which may not be appropriate within urban areas, or urban greenlinks that include native landscaping in streetscapes and open space areas located along them, which provide limited ecological function.
|
5. |
Identification of urban and rural zones, not supported by a regional water management strategy.
|
The structure plan is not supported by a regional water management strategy, as required by current State policy, and does not recognise the two key water constraints in the region: groundwater availability for active open space, and protection of wetland ecological water requirements. Water balance modelling is needed to ensure the protection of wetlands, and the provision of useable active open space for the community; the structure plan does not recognise these key issues.
There is opportunity for these issues to be addressed by a District Water Management Strategy undertaken to inform proposed MRS amendments. Rezoning must not be pursued until such strategies are complete, to undertake a district water balance to demonstrate whether there will be sufficient groundwater availability to support urban development, and to provide robust information on which the Department of Water can base or revise groundwater allocations.
These water management strategies also need to properly address acid sulphate soils and related issues which affect much of the study area.
|
6. |
That following finalisation of the EWSP and studies to determine detailed alignments and reserve requirements for regional roads and Parks and Recreation reserves, an amendment be initiated to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) to rezone land to Urban Deferred, and to reserve the regional road and Parks and Recreation areas. |
An MRS Amendment to rezone land to Urban Deferred should not be initiated until all required studies have been completed to confirm that Urban Deferred zoning is indeed appropriate. This particularly relates to:
· Resolution of the Carnabys Cockatoo habitat issue referred to in 1. above. (It should not be assumed that an offsets approach will be possible, or that all vegetation requiring protection will be able to be protected within an Urban zone). · Determination of exactly how proposed Priority Local Natural Areas and ecological linkages areas to be protected. · Protection of regional and district recreation open space areas. · Preparation of a regional water management strategy.
|
7. |
That a District Structure Plan not be required.
|
The planning process endorsed by Council in December 2007 included preparation of a District Structure Plan (DSP). Provided that the final EWSP includes a DSP – level of detail as to provide adequate guidance for subsequent preparation of Local Structure Plans (LSP), then a DSP may not be required.
However, the draft EWSP is considered to be lacking in some areas, particularly planning for:
· Activity Centres. It does not distinguish between Neighbourhood and Local Centres (Local Centres should not be shown at this level of planning). Retail modelling is required to better guide the sizes of the proposed centres. (Also note that Figure 13 appears to use a district centre symbol for the Wanneroo Regional Centre). · Employment. While the ‘Urban’ areas are proposed to also include light/service industrial areas, these used to be shown on the plan. · Community facilities and services, particularly regional/district recreation areas.
These matters must be addressed by the Department of Planning at this stage so that the City is not left to address them at subsequent planning stages, at significant cost and resource.
In general, the implementation process as a whole needs to be much more carefully considered, and a detailed program prepared which sets out clearly what is required to be done, by who and by whom.
|
8. |
That a major ‘South Pinjar’ industrial area be developed north of Neaves Road. |
Since the release of the draft EWSP, the WAPC has released for public comment the draft “Industrial Land Strategy (ILS) 2009 for Perth and Peel”. While the draft ILS shows the proposed South Pinjar industrial area, it also shows a number of possible new industrial areas which are not included in the draft EWSP (at Jandabup, Gnangara and a Wangara extension). While the draft EWSP identifies the Jandabup site as ‘Rural’ and ‘employment investigation area’, it infers that it is not intended as an industrial area in the same way that the draft ILS does.
There is a need for better consistency and alignment between these two WAPC studies. Such inconsistency causes considerable confusion for the community. |
|
Detailed Comments |
|
1. |
Executive Summary |
Page vii Paragraph 7 states “Abstraction to support the existing pine plantation and horticultural activities and are the main causes for declining groundwater levels”. The trend of declining ground water levels corresponds closely with abstraction for public water supply. Whilst the pine plantations and horticulture also contribute, the impact of abstraction for public supply, which now threatens the viability of horticulture and wetlands, should be acknowledged.
|
2. |
Executive Summary |
Page vii, paragraph 9 states “Addressing the various environmental concerns in a spatial plan has been an important driver for the formulation of the structure plan.” This is a false statement, as a strategic assessment for Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat has not been undertaken, and the significant concern of habitat loss has not been in any way addressed.
|
3. |
1.1 Planning Context |
Page 1, paragraph 5, dot point 2 states “detailed study on priority vegetation areas for protection and ecological linkages; particularly in relation to habitat for the endangered Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo, and/or potential offsets if necessary” presupposes that removal of habitat and offsets are appropriate. Such a comment cannot be made in the absence of a strategic assessment. See above comments regarding Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat.
|
4. |
1.4 Background |
Page 5, paragraph 7: refers to “increasing dependence on the mound by the Water Corporation”. The Corporation’s ‘Water Forever’ strategy involves a decreasing dependence on the mound.
|
5. |
Figure 4 |
Some areas shown as ‘market garden’ are not market gardens e.g. some are turf farms.
The former Benara nursery site in Wanneroo is shown as ‘vineyard’, however it is now vacant land.
|
6. |
2.1 Settlement Patterns |
Page 9, paragraph 2 states: “As the expansion of East Wanneroo will be constrained indefinitely by the adjacent State Forest and water protection control area, it will always be on the periphery of the metropolitan area …”. Disagree: those constraints need not indefinitely apply, and the City’s submissions on Directions 2031 and the draft GSS indicate why they should not apply. |
7. |
2.1 Settlement Patterns |
Page 9, paragraph 6: suggests that the draft EWSP is considering housing, in addition to employment generating uses, for the western part of the State Forest area. However, this draft proposes this area as ‘rural’ (Figure 11) and ‘investigation for employment uses’ (Figures 11 and 13).
|
9. |
2.2.1 Gnangara Groundwater Mound |
Page 11, paragraph 3. Should recognise water users in addition to public supply and horticulture, for example abstraction to provide active public open space which is threatened by abstraction for other uses.
|
10. |
2.2.2 Federally Listed Endangered Species
|
Page 11. This section does not properly recognise the areas of the structure plan that provide critical habitat to the species.
Paragraph 2 states “It is also likely that clearing habitat of Carnaby’s habitat will require an offsets package to be developed” presupposes that any clearing of threatened species is appropriate. The structure plan should clearly articulate the State’s position on whether it considers that knowingly zoning Federally endangered species critical habitat for urban development is appropriate or not.
Paragraph 3 states “BushForever areas and local natural areas are therefore important for the ongoing survival of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo”. BushForever and local natural areas protect a significantly greater amount of wetland vegetation (which does not form Carnaby’s foraging habitat) rather than Banksia woodlands (which do). This statement could be considered false, as a significant area of Carnaby’s habitat is not protected within such areas.
|
11. |
2.2.3 Natural Areas |
The effort to identify and provide for protection of Bush Forever sites and local natural areas is commendable. However, it would appear that the structure plan places more priority to protection of local and regional environmental assets than matters of national environmental significance (see discussion above regarding Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo). Page 13, paragraph 4 specifically states that native vegetation (Carnaby’s habitat) outside BushForever and local natural areas, including non-Carnaby’s habitat wetlands, are “probably of lower priority for protection”.
|
12. |
2.2.4 Wetlands |
Page 13, paragraph 2 of 2.2.4: refers to conservation category wetlands and wetlands of similar environmental value being ceded free of cost to the Crown. Where properties are relatively small and a wetland occupies a substantial portion of a property, it would be unreasonable and unfair to expect the wetland area to be ceded free of cost. Fair compensation should be provided for. (The City is currently considering a proposed Local Planning Policy on wetlands which would provide that conservation category wetlands be acquired through developer contributions, at a per hectare value which is 20%. That of the per hectare value of unencumbered, developable land). If it is intended that some of these wetland areas be included as part of the normal public open space (POS) provision, care will be needed that the POS is also still able to adequately provide for recreation and the other purposes required of POS.
|
13. |
2.2.4 Wetlands |
Page 13, paragraph 3 of 2.2.4: refers to some wetlands possibly not currently being assigned into the appropriate management category. This should be made clear in Figure 8.
|
14. |
2.2.4 Wetlands |
Page 13, paragraph 4 of 2.2.4: refers to appropriate reservation of important wetland areas occurring at local structure planning stage. Some important wetlands might be most appropriately protected through reservation under the MRS (similar to how some wetlands are already protected in this way). This matter needs to be addressed prior to initiation of the MRS rezoning of this area.
|
15. |
2.5.1.1 Metropolitan Region Scheme |
Page 19, paragraph 1 states “Amendments to the MRS to allow urban development would only be initiated once the WAPC has been satisfied that any constraints are addressed”. Constraints requiring resolution prior to MRS rezoning should be specified, and include:
Confirmation of strategic assessment of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo impacts under the EPBC Act, if it is determined that any removal is appropriate at all
Confirmation that sufficient groundwater shall be available to irrigate active open space requirements
The statement also appears very much at odds with the statement on page 37 (paragraph 4) which states “The Urban demarcated land will not be subject to the strategic studies performed by the State before rezoning of this land to Urban or Urban Deferred could commence, apart from: the access strategy and intersection treatment as indicated on Figure 13: Implementation Guide for the East Wanneroo Structure Plan regional road reserve demarcation and commitments to public use land (high schools, etc).”
|
16. |
2.5.2.1 Directions 2031 |
Page 19: does not acknowledge that the Directions 2031 report released earlier this year was a draft, and the final Directions 2031, and how it may respond to the submissions made on the draft, is still unknown.
|
17. |
2.5.2.3 Draft Gnangara Sustainability Strategy |
Paragraph 3 (page 21) states “The GSS favours additional urban land being sourced from areas already disturbed, rather than clearing natural vegetation.” The structure plan is at odds with this objective. Disturbed areas, and cleared pine plantation, should be provided as urban land, rather than Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat.
This paragraph also refers to the need to reduce abstraction. Urban use rather than agriculture uses for the land to the east would support reduction in abstraction.
|
18. |
3.2 Objectives – 3.2.1 Settlement Patterns |
Dot point 2 refers to minimising urban sprawl. Treating East Wanneroo as the long term ‘edge’ of the metropolitan urban area means that additional future urban growth needs to occur in areas which are much further away from the main part of the city (as compared to East Wanneroo), and therefore promotes urban sprawl.
|
19. |
3.2 Objectives – 3.2.1 Settlement Patterns |
Needs to include an objective relating to planning for community facilities and services, especially those of a regional or district scale. In the case of regional recreation facilities, these may require land to be reserved for Parks and Recreation on the MRS.
|
20. |
3.2 Objectives – 3.2.2 Ecological systems |
Dot point 1 refers to the need for land uses and development that ‘minimises water use, maximises recharge, and avoids groundwater contamination’. Urban uses to the east instead of agricultural uses would better achieve this objective.
|
21. |
3.2 Objectives – 3.2.2 Ecological Systems |
Dot point 6 provides the objective “Ensure appropriate investigation of environmental issues is undertaken and information is provided at each stage of the planning process to assist management of groundwater, wetlands, acid sulphate soils, natural vegetation and endangered species.”
This objective has not been met by the structure plan. Robust consideration of impacts on Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo and development of a regional water management strategy are key gaps in the supporting information. No certainty regarding land use can be provided without these analyses.
|
22. |
Objectives – 3.2.3 Movement and Access |
Dot point 5 refers to identification of public transport routes and catchments, and dot point 7 refers to establishing transport mode share targets. The draft does not address these objectives.
|
23. |
Figure 11 |
Greenvale Place, Mariginiup should not be shown as an Other Regional Road.
|
24. |
Figure 11 |
Dundebar Road should be shown as an Other Regional Road, rather than a District Road, given its importance in the regional road network, including its linkage from Franklin Road to Wanneroo Regional Centre.
|
25. |
Figure 11 |
Elliot Road, between Wanneroo Road and Lenore Road, is shown as an Other Regional Road, and 2.3 of the draft refers to the ARRB consultant’s traffic report recommending that this length of road be upgraded. This part of Elliot Road has a road reserve width of only 30 metres, with houses existing along it at normal residential setbacks. Any proposals for upgrading of this road which involve widening of the road reserve would therefore be likely to be very disruptive for properties along this road.
|
26. |
4.0 Structure Plan |
Page 27, paragraph 4: This suggests that protection of natural vegetation areas will occur through use of Parks and Recreation reserves, POS, and Bush Forever areas. There is likely to be a substantial amount of natural vegetation needing to be protected, especially considering the extent of the Priority Local Natural Areas, which are not currently envisaged for Parks and Recreation reservation or Bush Forever sites, and are unable to be included with the 10% POS allocation. This reinforces the need for the implementation mechanisms to be fully considered now, as it may be that some of this natural vegetation may need to be included in additional Parks and Recreation reserves.
|
27. |
4.2.1 Parks and Recreation |
Page 29, paragraph 1: Refers to land of regional significance for ecological, recreation and landscape purposes being nominated as Parks and Recreation. The draft does not nominate such land for recreation purposes on Figures 11 and 13. Figure 13 shows increases to the Parks and Recreation reserves around a number of the wetlands. The basis for those proposed extensions should be provided (ie how the new reserve boundaries have been delineated).
|
28. |
Figure 12 |
This shows “70m proposed primary regional roads buffer” and “50m proposed other regional roads buffer”, however the draft does not explain exactly what these are.
|
29. |
Figure 12 |
This shows “200m lake buffer”, but does not explain exactly what this means. If it is intended to protect land from urban development, then it should be included as Parks and Recreation reserve, and not protected through local open space provision.
|
30. |
4.3 Movement and Access |
· If Dundebar Road is to be a busway, need to consider what facilities will need to be incorporated in the Wanneroo Regional Centre. · If Dundebar Road is to be an Activity Corridor, need to consider the road reserve width required for this. · The proposed Lenore/Franklin Road Activity Corridor/Busway will require integrated pedestrian facilities and improved public transport to make it work. · Need to consider if bus stops will require increased road reserve width. · Need traffic modelling to show predicted traffic volumes. · Need to consider how dedicated bus lanes will be incorporated in Ocean Reef Road designs. · Need to ensure that the Other Regional Road definition study and Public Transport Plan are carried out quickly so that findings can be incorporated in its planning for existing infrastructure. · The ARRB 2008 Regional Transportation Study proposed a network of roads which included additional road links to those shown on Figure 13. Needs to be clarified if those additional road links are indeed required, and if so, what mechanisms will be used to ensure they are provided e.g. perhaps they should be included in the EWSP.
|
31. |
4.3.1 Primary Regional Roads |
Page 31, paragraph 3 of 4.3.1: Proposes 2 options for the northern extension of the proposed north-south primary road: either linking into Flynn Drive, or into Pinjar/Spence Road. It really needs to link into both of those roads, noting that the latter option in turn links further north into Old Yanchep Road.
|
32. |
4.3.2 Other Regional Roads and District Roads
|
Page 33, paragraph 3 of 4.3.2: Refers to a proposed District Open Space, which is not shown on Figures 11 or 13. |
33. |
4.3.3 Public Transport |
Page 33: This proposes moving future public transport users to the west, to use the northern suburbs railway line, which is already under peak hour pressure and which is forecast to grow with continued population growth to the north.
|
34. |
5.1 Approach |
Paragraph 2: States “The area indicated as Urban is deemed appropriate for development.” This conclusion cannot be drawn. See above discussion regarding Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo.
The rest of this section is generally convoluted, confused and misleading.
|
35. |
5.1 Approved |
Page 35: Unclear if the proposed Priority Local Natural Areas are intended to be included in the proposed Urban Deferred Zoning. This needs clarifying. They probably should not be.
|
36. |
5.0 Implementation |
Page 37: Proposes that actions to be taken by the City such as preparation of LSP and developer contribution arrangements be undertaken as a parallel process to the finalising of the EWSP and amendment of the MRS. Such City actions should not be undertaken until after the MRS amendment has been successfully completed. Significant time and resources could otherwise be wasted if the MRS amendment is not successfully completed.
|
37. |
5.0 Implementation |
Page 37: Refers to a local scheme amendment being initiated. It would be preferable for the local scheme amendment to be ‘automatically’ made by the WAPC, upon lifting of deferment. The local scheme has to be amended anyway to accord with the MRS, so there is no point in advertising for submissions etc. |
38. |
5.2 Settlement Patterns Policy principle: Higher residential densities in strategic locations |
The principle of providing higher densities close to centres and along activity corridors is supported. However, the principle should better consider “density extremes” – the location of those higher density areas and centres away from sensitive environmental attributes, and the provision of lower density in sensitive areas to retain natural landform and vegetation. Also, the proposal for a minimum residential density of 15 dwellings per gross hectare around neighbourhood centres needs further consideration, as this is the proposed average density over the whole urban area.
|
39. |
5.2.2 Existing Land Use Rights |
Page 38, paragraph 2: Refers to 1 km buffer around the Crown mushroom farm, however, Figure 13 only shows a 500m buffer. |
40. |
5.2.4 Sport, Recreation and Open Space |
Page 39: Proposes that sites for district open space facilities be determined prior to approval of LSP’s. This needs to be determined now. If a development contribution approach similar to the existing East Wanneroo Urban ‘cells’ is proposed, then such an approach may not facilitate provision of district open spaces of about 10ha. Therefore, alternative ways of doing this may need to be considered now.
|
41. |
5.2.7 Wastewater |
Page 40: Refers to this area being served by the new wastewater treatment plant at Alkimos. However, recently released ‘Water Forever’ proposes that it may be served by a future Neerabup recycling plant.
|
42. |
5.2.8 Energy |
Page 41: Proposes 8 new substations. These should be shown conceptually on Figure 11.
|
43. |
5.2.8 Energy |
Page 41: The transmission line easement needs to be finalised and designed into Lenore/Franklin Road now, unless it is to be on the eastern side of that road.
|
44. |
5.3.1 Gnangara Mound Protection Policy Principle: Gnangara Mound Protection |
The policy states that “water-efficient technologies, such as stormwater harvesting will assist in minimising groundwater abstraction for irrigation of public open space”. Such efforts are supported, however the structure plan needs to confirm if groundwater is available to facilitate the development of active open space needs for the community.
|
45. |
5.3.2 through 5.3.6 |
Whilst the intent of these policy principles is supported, as discussed previously there appears to be greater focus on protecting local and regional environmental assets, compared to those of national significance.
|
46. |
5.3.5 Protecting Ecological Systems – Policy Principle: Determine the financial implications and budget commitments for ecological linkages
|
The intended form of ecological linkages needs to be explained, if the financial implications are to be determined. See previous discussion regarding ecological linkages.
|
47. |
5.3.7 Urban Water Management Policy Principle: Urban and rural water management |
Paragraph 2: States “where a Drainage and Water Management Plan (DWMP) does not exist”. No MRS amendment to rezone should be supported without a District Water Management Strategy, prepared by Department of Water.
|
48. |
Policy Principle: Irrigation Management Plans |
The over allocated nature of the Gnangara Mound should require that all proposals to irrigate be supported by an irrigation management plan, not only for those proposals using reclaimed water.
|
49. |
5.5 Economy and Employment Policy Principle: Employment lands investigation area and amended PI Water Protection Area boundary. |
Page 45: Refers to “urban and employment generating land use”: Other parts of the draft appear to dismiss the urban option. The Draft is therefore confusing in this respect.
|
50. |
5.5 Economy and Employment Policy Principle: Public Transport connections
|
Page 45: Also needs to consider the proposed bus terminal at the northern end of Alexander Drive.
|
51. |
5.6 Governance and Legislation: 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 |
It is premature to include details of what the future developer contribution arrangements might entail in the EWSP. It should simply state that such arrangements shall be put in place, having regard for the relevant State Planning Policies.
Notwithstanding the above, the following comments are made on the details which have been included in the draft:
· Questionable as to the extent that conservation sites may be able to be subject to developer contributions. Should be noted that this could jeopardise financial viability of developments and extent to which developer contributions can be sought for essential community infrastructure and services. · Contributions for regional roads will be not just in relation to their upgrading, but also to their provision, where they presently do not exist. · Developer contributions to the City will not include utility services extensions. · Primary School sites are not considered for reservation under the local planning scheme until they have actually been acquired by the Education Department.
Policy Principle: Infrastructure Contributions: should be clarified that this only relates to areas where these are very large landholdings eg. Parts of Mariginiup. |
52 |
Appendix A |
A substantial area of ‘Existing Reserved Land’ is shown around Lake Mariginiup: much more than presently exists.
|
53. |
Appendix B |
Ref: Action 10: Also needs to investigate north-south transport and infrastructure corridor. |
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 5
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 6
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 7
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: SP/0135V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Jeremy Thompson
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
File Name: BA Adoption of Draft Local Structure Plan No 78 Jindalee Coastal Village.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Attachments: 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Lot 12 Jindalee Coastal Village Local Structure Plan No. 78 (LSP 78) to determine the modifications required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
Applicant |
Chappell Lambert Everett |
Owner |
Carine Nominees Pty Ltd |
Location |
Part Lot 9030 Marmion Avenue |
Site Area |
Approx 4.4 hectares |
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development Zone |
ASP 36 Zoning |
Centre Zone |
Background
The proposed LSP was submitted on 16 April 2009 and was subject to considerable review, negotiation and amendment prior to being advertised for public comment.
The Director Planning and Sustainability presented LSP 78 to the Council Forum held on Tuesday 8 September 2009. On 15 September 2009, the Director forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests were received and, as such, advertising of LSP 78 commenced on 13 October 2009 in accordance with Clause 9.4 of District Structure Plan No. 2 (DSP 2) and closed on 10 November 2009.
Detail
Site
The LSP 78 area applies to Part Lot 9030 Marmion Avenue Jindalee. The site lies on the western edge of the Lot 12 Jindalee Agreed Structure Plan No. 36 (ASP 36) between the foreshore area to the west and the residential area to the east. Under the initial endorsement of ASP 36, (adopted by Council on 24 November 2004) the subject land is zoned Centre Zone as shown in Attachment 1.
Proposal
The draft LSP, as shown in Attachment 2, has been prepared to provide the broad planning framework to facilitate development of the area and to satisfy the requirements of District Planning Scheme 2 (DSP 2) and LSP 36 that require a Local Structure Plan prior to any development of the ‘Centre’ Zone. The draft LSP proposes to activate the area by providing an active commercial, mixed use and residential precinct integrated with the foreshore area. The site is proposed to be zoned Commercial, Mixed Use and some land reserved for Parks and Recreation.
As per ASP 36, the subject Structure Plan area would have a residential density of R80. It is envisaged that a range of dwelling types and sizes would be provided within the area.
The draft LSP provides a wall height limit of 18m (23.5m to top of roof) or five storeys throughout the site. Notwithstanding the above, any portion of a building within 5m of a residential lot outside the Structure Plan area shall not be more than 3 storeys or 15m-wall height, (19.5m to top of the roof above natural ground level).
Consultation
The draft LSP was advertised for public comment for a period of 28 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper, the City’s website and letters written to adjoining landowners. The submission period closed on the 10 November 2009. Seven submissions were received. A summary of submissions received and Administration responses are included as Table 1 in Attachment 3.
Submissions were received from residents raising site specific design issues. Submissions were also received from government agencies. General comments received highlighted the need to review the impacts on adjoining residential land use and the need to undertake additional studies, such as the preparation of an Archaeological Survey and a Local Water Management Strategy. Responses to these issues have been provided in Attachment 3.
Comment
Consistency with Butler Jindalee District Structure Plan
The assessment of a local structure plan is ideally conducted in the context of an Agreed District Structure Plan, which provides the high order strategic planning for the site. In October 2006 the Butler-Jindalee Agreed District Structure Plan (DSP) was endorsed by the WAPC and the City. LSP 78 is located within the DSP area and the site is identified as a local Centre. LSP 78 is consistent with the DSP for this area.
Lot 12 Jindalee Agreed Structure Plan No 36
ASP 36 designates the coastal village area as ‘Centre’ in conformity with the DSP and the following provisions;
“The following matters shall be included in the matters to be considered when preparing a structure plan for the Coastal Node:
i. Land uses and zonings;
ii. Control and management of streetscapes and active frontages;
iii. Building setbacks to streets;
iv. Pedestrian movement system;
v. Vehicle access points and servicing;
vi. Security and surveillance of public spaces;
vii. Integration with foreshore;
viii. Building appearance;
ix. Building height and scale;
x. Site works and levels;
xi. Landscaping of public spaces;
xii. Car park strategy;
xiii. Provision of at least 5,468m² of public open space; and
xiv. Interface between the PAW, the adjoining development and the foreshore reserve.
These matters have all been addressed in LSP 78.
Impact on Residential Amenity
Nearby landowners have raised concerns covering potential impacts on the adjoining residential area. These issues were based on, but not limited to, the proposed height of the buildings allowed by the LSP and the potential impacts on the ocean views from some residences. This matter has arisen as a result of various documents previously published that gave the impression that the height limits in the coastal node would be maintained at two or three storeys, (including the Foreshore Management Landscape Concept as detailed in Attachment 4). These heights, however, were never approved by the City or WAPC and still comply with the State Planning Policy 2.6 which states heights to a maximum of 5 storeys can be permitted within the coastal area. The Local Structure Plan still allows for view corridors to the ocean, down Jindalee Boulevard and Roundhouse Parade.
Department of Indigenous Affairs
The Department of Indigenous Affairs (DIA) has undertaken a review of the area and there are no sites registered in the LSP 78 Area. Regardless, sites are protected whether registered or not and therefore the DIA has recommended that prior to the proposed development an Ethnological and Archaeological survey be conducted to the satisfaction of the DIA. It is therefore recommended that the requirement to undertake this survey is included in the statutory section of the LSP.
Conclusion
Considering the above comments, the draft LSP is considered to be acceptable, subject to the recommendation that a suitable provision be included in the statutory section requiring an Ethnographic and Archaeological Survey to be undertaken prior to any development occurring in the LSP area.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following advertisement of a Structure Plan, Council may refuse to adopt the Structure Plan or resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without modifications. It is recommended that the Local Structure Plan be approved with modifications.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options.
3.1 Increase availability of serviced commercial and industrial land.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No.2, RESOLVES that the draft Jindalee Coastal Village Local Structure Plan No 78 as submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett on behalf of Carine Nominees and outlined on Attachment 2 to this report )along with relevant accompanying documentation), is satisfactory, subject to the following modification being undertaken to the satisfaction of the Director, Planning and Sustainability:
a) The following provision being included in the Statutory Section of Local Structure Plan 78:
“Prior to undertaking any development within the structure plan area, the developer is to conduct an Ethnographic and Archaeological survey, in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Indigenous Affairs;”
2. Upon receipt of the documents modified in accordance with 1 above, FORWARDS the draft Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification;
3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS, SIGNS and SEALS the Structure Plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
4. FORWARDS a copy of comments made in the schedule of submissions to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Area subject to LSP 78
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P03/0645V01
File Name: BA Dedication of Lot 1002 1100 Wanneroo Road Ashby as Pinjar Road Reserve.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Ray Faul
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To dedicate the whole of lot 1002 (1100) Wanneroo Road, Ashby (refer Attachment 1) as road reserve. Lot 1002 was purchased by the City of Wanneroo under District Planning Scheme No 2 (East Wanneroo Cells 1 & 2) in October 2006 to accommodate the realignment of Pinjar Road.
Background
At its meeting on 27 April 2004 (item TS14-04/04), Council endorsed the East Wanneroo Arterial Road Plans, which included the preliminary road design and land requirement plans for Pinjar Road abutting East Wanneroo Cells 1 & 2. The land requirement plans identified that 1.1632 hectares was required from lot 18 (35) Pinjar Road, Ashby for the realignment of Pinjar Road. In October 2006 lot 18 (35) Pinjar Road was subdivided creating lots 1001 & 1002. Lot 1002 was purchased by the East Wanneroo Cells 1 & 2 as land for Pinjar Road deviation. With the imminent construction of Pinjar Road the dedication of the whole of lot 1002 as a road is required.
Statutory Compliance
The ability to dedicate the whole of lot 1002 as road reserve is authorised by the provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997.
Section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997 provides that where a local government requests the Minister for Lands to dedicate land as a road it is to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation that may arise from that action.
Strategic Implications
The dedication of lot 1002 (1100) Wanneroo Road as an arterial road complies with Council’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021 as follows:
“2.5.1 Develop and implement a road network to maximise neighbourhood connectivity and support a range of transport options”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Dedication of lot 1002 (1100) Wanneroo Road as a road will be funded by the East Wanneroo Cells 1 & 2. There will be no impact on any other area of the City’s operations.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the dedication of the whole of lot 1002 (1100) Wanneroo Road, Ashby as shown on deposited plan 47324 as a road under section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997. All costs associated with the dedication are to be debited to the East Wanneroo Cells 1 & 2 account; and
2 INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands against any claim for compensation arising from the dedication.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P12/0012V01
File Name: EA Home Business Category 3 Proposed Biscuit Manufacturing and Honey Repackaging at Lot 63 31 Mobilia Place Gnan.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Joseph Coppola
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application to operate a ‘Home Business – Category 3’ at Lot 63 (31) Mobilia Place, Gnangara.
Applicant |
D Starr |
Owner |
R & D Starr |
Location |
Lot 63 (31) Mobilia Place, Gnangara |
Site Area |
1.0024 Hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Special Rural (17) |
Background
The location of Lot 63 (31) Mobilia Place, Gnangara is shown on Attachment 1. The lot is zoned ‘Special Rural’ under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2), and specifically, is located within the Special Rural (17) area.
The application for planning approval for a ‘Category 3 Home Business’ at Lot 63 (31) Mobilia Place was submitted on 27 July 2009. Lot 63 contains a residential dwelling, two associated outbuildings and a swimming pool. Lot 63 is situated amongst other Special Rural lots with residential dwellings and associated developments.
Detail
The applicant intends to operate the Home Business from a portion of an existing outbuilding (refer Attachment 2). The applicant has submitted the following information in support of this proposal:
1. The business is to involve-
a) The baking of biscuits and storage of finished products.
b) The dispensing of Western Australian harvested honey delivered in 200 litre sealed containers, and dispensed directly into smaller containers.
2. The business is production and distribution only. No direct sales are to be carried out on the property.
3. The business requires 36m2 in area for this activity. This area is to be fully lined in Cool Room panelling with suitable material required for the purpose of food manufacture.
4. Major equipment required for the business is a mixer, oven and fridge.
5. There would be possibly one extra vehicle parking on the property for which there is ample space to accommodate.
6. The employment of a total of two employees (one landowner, and an external person).
7. The proposed operating hours are from 7am to 4pm, for approximately two days a week. Other work associated with the business is to be carried out away from the property.
8. There would be a maximum of two (2) trucks (under three tonne) delivering to the property each week.
Consultation
The proposal was advertised for public comment for 21 days, commencing on 1 October 2009, to seven adjoining landowners. During the advertising period, the City received three written objections regarding the proposal.
Summary of Comments
The objectors have raised a number of concerns in relation to the proposed Home Business. A summary of these concerns, together with Administration’s comments, are listed below:
Issue 1
Increase in the amount of traffic, especially from large vehicles, such as trucks and courier vans.
Comment:
The amount of vehicles entering and exiting the site in association with the proposed business is considered minimal. As stated above, the applicant expects that a maximum of two (2) trucks will deliver goods to the site per week. In addition, one employee that is not a resident of the site is expected to drive to and from the subject property two days a week. The applicant has advised that the manufactured and repackaged goods will be transported from the site in the applicant’s car to their place of sale, and that no customers (wholesale or retail) will visit the site.
In total – excluding vehicle movements made by the occupiers of the subject property – it is expected that eight (8) vehicle movements will occur to and from the subject property per week.
Issue 2
The proposed use of the outbuilding is industrial in nature.
Comment
Although the definition of ‘industry’ contained within DPS 2 includes the ‘manufacture of edible goods’, Administration considers that the ‘Home Business – Category 3’ definition contained within DPS 2 better defines the operations proposed in this instance, because the ‘Industry’ definition is general and not one of the five ‘industry’ use classes (being extractive, general, hazardous, light and rural) listed in the zoning table of DPS 2.
In this regard, the proposed use is also not classifiable as one of these five industrial use categories, and is therefore appropriately assessed as being a ‘Home Business – Category 3’.
Issue 3
Parking of vehicles encroaching onto the road reserve.
Comment
The subject property is over one hectare in area. The property has extensive driveways and ample parking on site to accommodate for a truck delivering goods as well as parking for an additional employee. This can be managed through conditions of approval, to ensure that vehicles related to the Home Business are parked on-site at all times.
Issue 4
Any signage relating to the business may reduce the visual amenity of the locality.
Comment
The definition of ‘Home Business – Category 3’ allows a home business operator to erect a sign on the premises that is no more than 0.2 square metres in area. However, the applicant has not proposed any signage as part of this application.
Issue 5
The Home Business may expand further, causing additional detriment to the surrounding owners.
Comment
The scale of the proposed Home Business can be limited through conditions of approval relating to operating times, and the area of the proposed outbuilding that the Home Business occupies. Further applications for approval would therefore be required if the nature of this Home Business were to be modified outside the conditions imposed.
Issue 6
This Home Business will set a precedent for other landowners in the locality to propose similar home businesses.
Comment
Home businesses approved by the City encompass a variety of homed-based occupations, in a variety of localities. The nature of homed-based operations vary considerably and are assessed on the merits of each application.
Issue 7
A Home Business is already operating on the premises.
Comment
One submitter raised this concern, as this submitter has ‘sometimes’ observed ‘delivery vehicles’ entering and exiting the site. In response to this concern, the applicant has advised that they currently do not operate a business from this property; however, the applicant may receive a delivery to the subject property infrequently relating to business conducted off-site.
Comment
In respect to the Special Rural Zone, Clause 3.18.1 of DPS 2 states the intent of this zone; that development in this zone is to be ‘conducted in a manner that preserves local amenity and the natural landscape or rural character of the zone concerned’. In this regard, the proposal does not contravene the intent of the Special Rural Zone.
Objectives of the Special Rural Zone, as stated in clause 3.18.2 (c) of DPS 2 include:
(a) designate areas where rural-residential retreats can be accommodated without detriment to the environment or the rural character;
(b) meet the demand for a rural lifestyle on small rural lots generally ranging from one to four hectares in size; and
(c) maintain and enhance the rural character and amenity of the locality.
The proposal does not conflict with the objectives as stipulated in clause 3.18.2 (c) of DPS 2. Furthermore, this proposal is compatible with the definition of ‘Home Business – Category 3’ as stated in Schedule 1 of DPS 2, as follows:
“Home Business – Category 3: means a business, service, trade or similar activity carried on in a dwelling or on land around a dwelling by a resident of the dwelling which:
(a) does not entail the retail sale, outdoor display or hire of goods of any nature;
(b) does not cause injury to or prejudicially affect the amenity of the neighbourhood;
(c) does not detract from the residential appearance of the dwelling house or domestic outbuilding;
(d) entails employment of a maximum of 2 persons not members of the occupier’s household. Council may approve a greater number of employees, not exceeding 4 persons, subject to community consultation;
(e) occupies an area not exceeding 50 square metres. Council may approve; subject to community consultation; an area of up to 100 square metres, or one third of the floor area of the dwelling whichever is the lesser;
(f) displays a sign describing the nature of the approved home occupation. The sign must not exceed 0.2 square metres, and a maximum 2 metres high;
(g) will not result in traffic difficulties as a result of the inadequacy of on-site and off-site parking;
(h) will not result in a substantial increase in the amount of vehicular traffic in the vicinity;
(i) does not involve the servicing or repair for gain of motor vehicles; and
(j) does not entail the presence, parking and garaging of a vehicle of more than 3.5 tonnes tare weight.”
The proposed Home Business will, if approved, require separate approval and licensing by the City’s Health Services unit, in respect of food preparation and handling areas and practices.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been processed in accordance with the provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme (DPS 2).
The subject lot is zoned ‘Special Rural’ under DPS 2. Under DPS 2, the use class of ‘Home Business – Category 3’ is discretionary in the Special Rural Zone. The application therefore requires the Council to exercise its discretion and either approve the application with or without conditions or refuse the application. Conditions relating to the term of any approval may also be applied in accordance with Clause 6.9 of DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal is consistent with the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006-2021:
“3.6 Increase support for new and existing business”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council, in accordance with the provisions of the District Planning Scheme No. 2, APPROVES the application for a Home Business – Category 3 – Proposed Biscuit Manufacturing and Honey Repackaging at Lot 63 (31) Mobilia Place, Gnangara submitted by D Starr, subject to the following conditions:
1. Permission is only granted to D Starr (the applicant) to conduct a ‘Home Business – Category 3’ at the above address. This approval is not transferable or assignable to any other person or property;
2. The ‘Home Business – Category 3’ shall operate within the conditions imposed within this approval and the following definition of ‘Home Business – Category 3’ as stipulated in the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2:
“Home business – category 3: means a business, service, trade or similar activity carried on in a dwelling or on land around a dwelling by a resident of the dwelling which:
a) does not entail the retail sale, outdoor display or hire of goods of any nature;
b) does not cause injury to or prejudicially affect the amenity of the neighbourhood;
c) does not detract from the residential appearance of the dwelling house or domestic outbuilding;
d) entails employment of a maximum of 2 persons not members of the occupier’s household. Council may approve a greater number of employees, not exceeding 4 persons, subject to community consultation;
e) occupies an area not exceeding 50 square metres. Council may approve; subject to community consultation; an area of up to 100 square metres, or one third of the floor area of the dwelling whichever is the lesser;
f) displays a sign describing the nature of the approved home occupation. The sign must not exceed 0.2 square metres, and a maximum 2 metres high;
g) will not result in traffic difficulties as a result of the inadequacy of on-site and off-site parking;
h) will not result in a substantial increase in the amount of vehicular traffic in the vicinity;
i) does not involve the servicing or repair for gain of motor vehicles; and
j) does not entail the presence, parking and garaging of a vehicle of more than 3.5 tonnes tare weight;
Any changes to the nature of the approved ‘Home Business – Category 3’, which would result in the conditions of this approval no longer being met, would require further approval from the City;
3. This approval is valid for a period of 12 months only and an application for renewal of approval shall be submitted at least 4 weeks prior to the expiry of this approval. If application for renewal is not made then the home business shall immediately cease operation at the end of the 12 months;
4. Hours of operation shall be restricted to between the hours of 7am and 4pm per day for up to two days per week (from Monday to Friday only excluding Public Holidays);
5. Deliveries of goods to the property associated with the approved Home Business shall be limited to two per week, and limited within the time of operation of the approved Home Business as stipulated in condition 4 above;
6. Employee parking and deliveries shall be contained within the subject property, and not encroach onto the adjacent street or road verge;
7. Noise levels generated from the site are to comply with Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997, and to be maintained at a level to the satisfaction of the City of Wanneroo.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 3
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P03/0021V02
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Joseph Coppola
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To review conditions of a Planning Approval that relate to a requirement for a secondary access to the Lake Joondalup Lifestyle Village (DA04/0453), and consider approval for a security controlled gate to control the egress of vehicles from the subject property onto Cassatt Street.
Applicant |
David Woo |
Owner |
National Lifestyle Villages Pty Ltd |
Location |
Lot 100 (1140) Wanneroo Road, Ashby |
Site Area |
10.8996 Hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Structure Plan No. 3 Precinct |
Park Home Park |
Background
The site is located on Wanneroo Road, Ashby, approximately 1.8km north of the Wanneroo Town Centre. Administration has identified 316 Park Homes on the subject property, which is consistent with previous planning approvals restricting the owners of the Lifestyle Village to maintain a maximum of 318 Park Homes. The site currently has its primary access point from Wanneroo Road. A secondary egress point is currently in operation from Cassatt Street, which is only used occasionally. The site also has security-controlled pedestrian access points at Torogay Road and Cassatt Street. A map depicting the location of the site is included as Attachment 1.
Under Delegated Authority, Administration granted retrospective Planning Approval on 27 April 2005 for the development of an additional 13 Park Home Park sites (DA04/0453). This approval was subject to a number of conditions; conditions 3 and 4 are subject to review in this report. The conditions of the previously issued approval are as follows:
1. A maximum of 318 park homes may be constructed/erected on the site.
2. All setbacks from internal roads, and other vans/park homes, and boundary fences are to be to the satisfaction of the Manager Development and Health Services.
3. The internal road ... being connected to the abutting subdivisional road under construction so as to provide additional vehicular access to the development to the satisfaction of the Manager Development and Health Services.
4. In respect to Condition 3, the vehicle crossover for the road connection shall be designed and constructed to the City’s commercial specifications to the satisfaction of the Manager Development and Health Services.
5. Retaining walls are to be provided where the angle of natural repose of the soil cannot be maintained. Drawn details, signed by a practising Structural Engineer, must be submitted for approval with the Building Licence submission.
6. All stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Manager of Development and Health Services.
7. All park homes shall be connected to reticulated sewerage to the satisfaction of the Manager Development and Health Services.
In relation to conditions 3 and 4, an internal road has been constructed up to the eastern boundary, however this internal road does not connect with the adjoining Torogay Road. It is also noted that the internal road is situated approximately 1.0 metre below the level of Torogay Road, and that the two roads do not align. Administration and Council have been informed that this condition was not fulfilled. Administration has sought to have this issue rectified with the Lifestyle Village management, with their response being the lodgement of this Planning Application on 17 July 2009 (DA2009/592).
Detail
As part of this application, the applicant has requested the City ‘delete’ or remove the requirement to provide secondary access connecting Torogay Road, as imposed under the aforementioned planning approval (DA04/0453). The applicant has argued that access to Torogay Road cannot be achieved, given the internal constructed road does not align horizontally or vertically with Torogay Road. As an alternative – and whilst maintaining the pedestrian access points currently connecting with Cassatt Street and Torogay Road – the applicant has designated a secondary vehicular access point to connect with Cassatt Street. This access point is proposed to be used predominantly as a point of egress, as demonstrated on the plan included as Attachment 2.
In addition to removing the requirement to maintain a secondary vehicular access to Torogay Road, the applicant has also applied to upgrade the egress point that currently links with Cassatt Road. The owner has created an additional access to Cassatt Road by installing a manually controlled gate. It is now intended to convert the manually operated gate at this access point to a secure controlled gate. The applicant has emphasised that the gate will be closed at all times unless accessed by the village residents or if required, fire and emergency services.
Consultation
Applicant’s Consultation with Residents of the Park Home Park
The applicant had arranged the preparation of a Traffic Engineering Report to accompany the submission of this application. To study the potential internal vehicular movements, the management of the Lifestyle Village advised the residents within the Lifestyle Village that the Cassatt Street gate would be open from 7:00am to 6:00pm from 22 June to 28 June 2009.
A traffic count was undertaken studying vehicle movements into and out of the access point onto Cassatt Street during this period. The results recorded a weekday average of 47 vehicles, with 10 vehicles accessing and 37 vehicles egressing through this access point per day.
The management of the Lifestyle Village then undertook a survey of the 316 households within the Park Home Park. The Lifestyle Village received 168 responses, where 107 favoured vehicle access onto Cassatt Street, and 24 favoured secondary access onto Torogay Road. There were 37 responses that suggested that the village did not require any secondary access point.
Consultation with Nearby Residents
Given that this Planning Application is a review of conditions from a previous planning approval, Administration did not consult with adjoining landowners of properties in Torogay Road or Cassatt Street. It is considered that the amenity of the adjoining owners in Torogay Road would be unchanged, as no access/egress is currently available to the Park Home Park to or from that road. Furthermore, it is not anticipated that traffic on Cassatt Street would substantially increase to cause detriment or loss of amenity as a result of anticipated additional use of the existing gate situated on the northeastern portion of the subject property.
Consultation with Main Roads Western Australia
In July 2008, the management of the Lifestyle Village invited comment from a representative from Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) regarding the access point at Cassatt Street. Main Roads’ involvement with this issue is necessary as Wanneroo Road is identified as a ‘Primary Regional Road’, and as such, is under the care and jurisdiction of Main Roads. Main Roads were in support of this concept, which would result in northbound vehicles accessing Wanneroo Road at Monet Drive – as opposed to allowing vehicles to right-turn onto Wanneroo Road from the primary access point.
On the submission of this application, comment was sought from Main Roads to verify their opinion on this matter, especially as works to upgrade Wanneroo Road has commenced. Main Roads responded confirming their ‘no objection’ to the applicant’s requested revised conditions.
Comment
The Traffic Engineering Report supplied by the applicant, comments that vehicular access through a gate at Cassatt Street offers a more direct and convenient route to Wanneroo Road for residents that travel north from the site. Administration supports this view, and as such, considers that conditions three and four of the previous planning approval (DA04/0453) are not required.
It is, however, necessary that a secondary access – and especially a secondary point of egress is provided. Currently, the only permanent access point to and from the site does not allow for vehicles to turn right directly onto Wanneroo Road. Modifications to this intersection are not supported by Main Roads, as it would result in a staggered ‘T’ junction being formed at Wallawa Street, which would introduce potential conflict with vehicles from the village with those exiting out of Wallawa Street.
An access from Cassatt Street would provide for a more direct access to Wanneroo Road, whilst limiting vehicle movements on the local access roads in the Ashby locality. The applicant’s proposal to provide a secondary access from the subject property onto Cassatt Street would result in a significant portion of the journey to Wanneroo Road via a local distributor road (Monet Drive), which is intended to accommodate a greater volume of traffic. By insisting on a vehicle access connecting to Torogay Road, the route to Wanneroo Road would be indirect, and would involve a greater portion of the journey to Wanneroo Road via a number of local access roads (Torogay Road to Hennessey Drive to Sistina Road) before vehicles enter Carosa Road, also a local distributor road. From Carosa Road, vehicles can access Wanneroo Road via Pinjar Road.
Therefore it is considered that condition 3 of the previous approval is not required. If the requirement to comply with condition 3 of the previous approval is no longer necessary, Administration is also in the view that condition 4 of the previous approval is also no longer required, and could also be deleted.
In addition to the deletion of conditions 3 and 4, it is also considered that conditions 2, 6 and 7 of the previous approval would need to be updated to reflect the structural changes in Administration since the previous approval was issued. The modifications to conditions 2, 6 and 7 would delete reference to ‘Manager of Development and Health Services’ and replace this with reference to ‘Manager Planning Implementation’. This is necessary, because the only way that the development can be approved again, but without conditions 3 and 4 (and with changes to conditions 2,6 and 7), is to issue a new approval that supersedes the previous approval granted on 27 April 2005. In doing so, the new approval must be able to stand in its own right, without any reliance on the prior approval.
In conclusion, it is recommend that Council replaces the previous approval with a new approval without conditions 3 and 4, and with modifications to conditions 2, 6 and 7. In addition, it is also recommended that Council support the modification to the security controlled gate, provided that the gate is predominantly used for egress only (with the exception of emergency vehicles or vehicles towing boats, caravans or equivalent) and that the design and finish of the gate will complement surrounding development to the City’s satisfaction.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been considered in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Strategic Implications
The proposal should satisfy the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“2.5 Improve transport options and connections”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council in accordance with District Planning Scheme No. 2, APPROVES the request submitted by D Woo on behalf of National Lifestyle Villages Pty Ltd to review conditions of approval granted on 27 April 2005 (DA04/0453) for additional Park Home Park sites at Lot 100 (1140) Wanneroo Road, Ashby, and REPLACES that approval with approval for the same development, subject to the following conditions:
1. This approval extinguishes and supersedes the approval granted on 27 April 2005 (DA04/0453) for additional Park Home Park sites;
2. A maximum of 318 park homes may be constructed/erected on the site;
3. All setbacks from internal roads, and other vans/park homes, and boundary fences are to be to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation;
4. Retaining walls are to be provided where the angle of natural repose of the soil cannot be maintained. Drawn details, signed by a practising Structural Engineer, must be submitted for approval with the Building Licence submission;
5. All stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Manager Planning Implementation;
6. All park homes shall be connected to reticulated sewerage to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation;
7. With the exception of emergency vehicles and vehicles towing boats, caravans and the like, the vehicle access gate shown as ‘proposed secondary access predominantly used for egress only’ on Attachment 2, shall only be used for vehicles to egress the site onto Cassatt Street; and
8. Any modifications to the gate referred to in condition v) shall complement surrounding development by way of colour, design and materials, to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P20/0085V02
File Name: EA PROPOSED KENNEL EXTENSIONS.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Aiton Sheppard
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 6
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for an additional kennel block that has the potential to increase the capacity of the West Coast Pet Care establishment from 190 to 420 dogs.
Applicant |
M Rodic & Associates |
Owner |
M & LG Walker |
Location |
Lot 51 (49) Adams Road, Mariginiup |
Site Area |
3.5 hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Background
At its meeting on 17 November 2009, Council referred this matter to its December meeting. The intent of the referral was to provide time for the applicant to provide operational management details of the existing and proposed kennel facilities and for Administration to provide further information regarding the impact of the State Government’s recently released Draft East Wanneroo Sub-Regional Structure Plan.
The boarding kennels and cattery at Lot 51 date back to 1993. Attachment 1 illustrates the location of Lot 51. Attachment 2 illustrates the two existing kennel buildings (A and B), and the proposed new kennel building C. Attachments 3 to 6 show the internal layout of the kennels, and the elevations of the concrete panel shed within which they will be constructed.
Detail
The kennel runs are to be built at two levels within a large shed. The proposed shed will measure 51m by 16m with a height of 6m. The proposal has the potential to more than double the number of dogs that can be accommodated from 190 to 420. The kennel component is of a sophisticated design, with a self-contained drainage system for easy cleaning. A licence to operate a kennel is required under the City’s Animal Local Law before the kennel extensions can be operated.
The applicant has submitted the following details in relation to the operation of the kennels:
Exercising of Dogs
At present, the dogs are exercised in the yards located inside Kennel B; within the reticulated grassed area on the property (approximately 4 acres); and occasionally along the local bridle tracks. The dogs are exercised either individually or in small groups for short periods throughout the day.
The applicant is proposing to landscape the area to the east of the kennel buildings to include circuitous grassed paths, trees and shrubs (3.5 acres) with this area to replace the occasional use of the bridle tracks. The increase in dogs boarding at the kennels will be complemented by an increase in staff to manage the care and exercise of the dogs.
Proposed capacity of boarding kennels
The current capacity of the existing facility is only reached a few days a year and the new building will not result in an immediate increase of 200 dogs on site. It is expected that the new building will gradually come into use over several years, giving management ample time to adequately resource and manage the increase in dogs boarding at the kennels.
Waste Management
Liquid and solid waste throughout the kennels are treated in septic systems, with treated liquid waste dispersed through several leach drains and residual solid waste extracted and disposed of off site by a waste contractor. Regular watering of the lawn area ensures that liquid waste does not ‘burn’ the lawn or result in a build up of odours. Solid waste is collected from the lawn areas (along with cat litter from the cattery) and disposed of in large bins, emptied by the contractor and disposed of off site. An increase in waste will require the bins to be emptied on a more regular basis.
Double Decker Modular Kennel System
The produce is manufactured to order by a US company and is distributed and installed in Australia by Kennel Solutions. The applicant is aware of at least one kennel in Sydney (Hanrob) utilising the modular kennel system
Consultation
In June 2009, the application was advertised by way of notices inviting comments from seventeen surrounding landowners. Twenty submissions were received, mainly in a standard letter format, objecting to the kennel extensions. There were five main grounds of objection, which are summarised in the following table, together with the Administration comments:
ISSUE COMMENT
1. Noise and occasional smell from Lot 51. |
This will be controlled under the City’s Animal Local Law. The applicant has submitted a noise assessment from consulting engineers, which does not anticipate any increase above existing noise levels. The proposed kennels will be contained within a new shed comprising 125mm thick concrete panel walls, zincalume steel roof with acoustic baffled exhaust vents and only a single access door on each end (fire escape doors are also proposed on the sides of the shed). Refer also to main Comment section below. |
2. Increased traffic on Adams Road, Dempster Place and Coogee Road. |
Adams Road ends in a cul-de-sac north of Lot 51 and does not continue through to Neaves Road. Adams Road and Dempster Place provide access to Lot 51 from Coogee and Neaves Roads. The applicant advises that the average dog stay is 10 days with about 100 vehicles expected to attend the kennels by appointment each week. At peak times the applicant anticipates 20 cars could be at the premises. Adequate space is available for onsite parking. |
3. The potential for future subdivision in the area will be prejudiced if kennels do not re-locate. |
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) recommends a generic buffer of between 500 and 1000 metres between kennels and sensitive land uses. Noise and odour are the main issues with kennels, so residential dwellings will be the main sensitive use in this case. Kennels already exist on Lot 51 and the adjacent Lot 50 to the north, and approximately 24 dwellings are within 500 metres of them. Refer also to Strategic Implications below. |
4. Conflict between dogs and horses, when dogs are exercised on bridle paths by inexperienced handlers, and are aggressive towards horses. |
Special Rural Zone No 4 surrounds Lake Adams to the west of Lot 51, and was subdivided to provide smaller lots for residential and equestrian purposes. The applicant has advised that as part of the proposed upgrade, it is intended that the dogs will be exercised on site, rather than in public areas, although the City’s Animal Local Law does not preclude the exercising of dogs in public areas. |
5. Environmental and health risks from faeces left along road verges and bridle paths by dogs being exercised off site. |
A waste management plan will be required for approval when application is made for a kennel licence. |
Many objectors also stated that whilst they presently tolerate the kennels, they feel that the impact on the area will become unacceptable if the kennels are expanded.
Comment
The City’s Health and Ranger Services have not raised any concern about the proposal. Stringent conditions for the operation of kennels are contained in the City’s Animal Local Law, which requires an annual kennel licence to be held by kennel operators. Administration of the local law is the responsibility of Health Services and, when licences are due for annual renewal, inspections are carried out on its behalf by Ranger Services. The local law will control such matters as waste disposal, ventilation, drainage, noise and hours of operation.
The City's records indicate that no complaints have been received about the existing kennel operations on Lot 51, other than a minor concern raised in September 2008 regarding the exercise of dogs and dog excreta not being collected. These matters were readily resolved without any further action needing to be taken by the City.
Statutory Compliance
Lot 51 is in the General Rural Zone of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No 2 and kennels are listed as a “D” (discretionary use) in this zone. It must be noted that kennels exist on both Lot 51 and Lot 50. The proposed kennel additions are not expected to have a material impact on the preservation of amenity in this area, where kennels are well established. The City’s Animal Local Law provides the mechanism to control the way the kennels are operated and maintained.
Strategic Implications
Lot 51 is within the future planning area for East Wanneroo. The Future East Wanneroo – Landuse and Water Management in the Context of Network City (August 2007) document proposed the retention of existing special rural and rural zonings in the vicinity of Lot 51. However, on 2 November 2009, the Western Australian Planning Commission released the Draft East Wanneroo Structure Plan for public comment. The draft structure plan designates the subject area “Urban”, in direct conflict with the preceding East Wanneroo Study. However, the draft structure plan cannot be regarded in any statutory sense as being an approval of urbanisation.
The Commission will be considering submissions it receives on the draft structure plan before it approves a final structure plan, which might or might not still propose this area as urban. Should it still be proposed as urban, the Commission can be expected (at some time) to initiate an amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) to rezone this area to “Urban Deferred”. The outcome of that amendment process will determine if the area will indeed be rezoned urban deferred or not. If it is rezoned to urban deferred then, at that time, there will be some certainty that in the future the area will indeed be put to urban use, subject to the resolution of all the issues to enable the lifting of the deferment. A separate report is included on this agenda for Council to consider the Commission’s draft East Wanneroo Structure Plan.
Conclusion
Urbanisation in Mariginiup is neither guaranteed nor imminent. The use of Lot 51 for kennels is not an issue, as it is an existing lawful use. The application to be determined is the construction of another structure which will increase the total capacity of the kennels up to 420 dogs. Kennels on Lot 51 will continue to be subject to annual licensing under the City’s local law. It is the local law that will control the kennel operations to minimise nuisance to the neighbourhood.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That in accordance with District Planning Scheme No. 2 Council APPROVES the application submitted by M Rodic and Associates Pty Ltd on behalf of M and LG Walker (the owner) to extend the kennels on Lot 51 (49) Adams Road, Mariginiup, subject to compliance with the following conditions:
1. Not more than 420 dogs may be kept on the subject lot, in accordance with an annual kennel licence issued under the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Law 1999;
2. The owner shall submit a waste management plan for approval by the City, when an application is made under the Local Law for a licence to increase the number of dogs that may be kept at Lot 51;
3. On site car parking shall be provided for all kennel staff and for visitors to the kennels to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation; and
4. The existing trees and vegetation along the southern boundary of Lot 51 shall be retained and maintained.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 4
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P13/1576V01
File Name: ED Development Application Two Grouped Dwellings Lot 548 22 Chesterfield Avenue Hocking DA2009 633 .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Joseph Coppola
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for the development of two grouped dwellings on Lot 548 (22) Chesterfield Avenue, Hocking, where an objection to the proposed walls on the boundary has been received.
Applicant |
Danmar Homes Pty Ltd |
Owner |
Nicholas & Fiona Carter |
Location |
Lot 548 (22) Chesterfield Avenue, Hocking |
Site Area |
450m2 |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Structure Plan Zoning |
Residential R40 |
Background
The location of Lot 548 is shown on Attachment 1. This lot has been designated R40 under the City’s Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 6, and has a size of 450m2. In accordance with the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia (R-Codes) there is potential for two dwellings to be constructed on the subject property.
Lot 548 is currently vacant and is situated amongst lots with a variety of density codings from R20 to R40, most of which contain recently constructed dwellings, or dwellings that are currently under construction.
Detail
The application proposes two single storey grouped dwellings, orientated northwards towards Chesterfield Avenue. A site plan and an elevation plan have been included as Attachment 2.
Part 6.3.2 (A2) of the acceptable development provisions of the R-Codes require that in areas coded R30 and higher, buildings can be built up to one side boundary. The applicant is proposing parapet walls on both the eastern and western side boundaries of Lot 548.
The applicant has requested the City to exercise discretion under part 6.3.2 (P2) of the R-Codes, which provides for a performance-based consideration in accordance with the following criteria:
· make effective use of space; or
· enhance privacy; or
· otherwise enhance the amenity of the development;
· not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity of the adjoining property; and
· ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas of adjoining properties is not restricted.
Consultation
Part 4 of the R-Codes specifies that where Council is requested to apply the performance criteria for a residential development, consultation should be carried out with potentially affected owners of adjoining properties. In accordance with Part 4.2 of the R-Codes, Administration sought comment from the adjoining owners of Lot 548. Accordingly, these adjoining owners were advised to provide their written comments within a period of 14 days.
The City has received one objection from an adjoining landowner to the east. The issue raised in the objector’s comment relates to the proximity of the development to their property.
Comment
The issue raised in the objection and a response by Administration is provided below.
Issue:
“Wall is too close to the fence/boundary.”
Comment:
This objection is not supported as the submitter’s comment only relates to the proposed proximity of the boundary wall to their property and not to any potential impact on their amenity.
The wall, subject of the objection, is only 6.25 metres in length and no more than 2.65 metres in height. Its impact on the adjoining property is considered to be minimal, given the design and orientation of the adjoining dwelling.
The proposed development has been considered against the provision of the R-Codes and the proposed boundary wall is considered to satisfy the performance criteria of clause 6.3.2 P2.
Notwithstanding the objection from the owner of the adjoining property, it is recommended that the application be approved.
Statutory Compliance
The application has been processed in accordance with the Residential Design Codes and District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2, the use class of ‘Grouped Dwelling’ is discretionary in the Residential Zone. The application requires the Council’s determination because an objection has been received.
Strategic Implications
The proposal satisfies the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan for 2006-2021:
“1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council in accordance with the provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 APPROVES the application submitted by Danmar Homes Pty Ltd for two grouped dwellings at Lot 548 (22) Chesterfield Avenue, Hocking, subject to:
1. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with the City's Local Laws prior to the occupation of the dwelling(s);
2. The minimum distance between the gutter line of the dwelling and the boundary shall be no less than 750mm, unless the gutter forms part of a parapet wall permitted by this approval;
3. All stormwater shall be collected on-site and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Manager Planning Implementation;
4. The private yard areas shall be nominated and suitably screened from adjoining dwellings and the street prior to the development first being occupied;
5. The driveways and crossover shall be designed and constructed to the residential specifications and to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation, prior to the occupation of dwellings; and
6. Walls on the boundary shall be finished and/or rendered to harmonise with the developments and setting of the affected adjoining properties, to the satisfaction of the Manager Planning Implementation.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: PR36/0006
File Name: A Yanchep Boardwalk Update.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Len Kosova
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider advice received from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) regarding the Yanchep Boardwalk.
Background
A recent Administration review of the Yanchep Boardwalk identified that the boardwalk has not been constructed in accordance with the planning approval granted for the development by the WAPC on 22 April 2008.
Administration subsequently wrote to the Department of Planning on 1 October 2009, providing a detailed account of the background to this matter, with a view to seeking WAPC direction on how best to resolve the situation. In response, correspondence has now been received from the Chairman of the WAPC outlining the Commission’s position (refer Attachment 1).
Council at its meeting of 17 November 2009 considered a confidential report (CR04-11/09) on the Yanchep Boardwalk and resolved as follows:
“That Council:-
1. NOTES that the Yanchep/Two Rocks Foreshore Management Plan made provision for the construction of the Yanchep Boardwalk;
2 NOTES that whilst extensive community consultation occurred in both the development of the Yanchep/Two Rocks Foreshore Management Plan and the construction of the dual use pathway between Foreshore Vista and Compass Circle, Administration did not provide an opportunity for the community to comment on the construction of the Boardwalk that has been constructed;
3. NOTES that the construction of the Yanchep Boardwalk is not in accordance with the concept design plans that formed part of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) approval for the construction of the Boardwalk;
4. NOTES that the City has submitted revised plans showing the current alignment to the Boardwalk to the WAPC for its consideration; and
5. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council after the City has received formal advice from the WAPC.”
This report is presented to Council in accordance with Item 5 of the above-mentioned resolution.
Detail
The attached letter from the WAPC raises four key points, as follows:
1. Construction of the boardwalk has not been undertaken wholly in accordance with the approved plans. The WAPC will commence enforcement action against the City unless corrective action is taken regarding the boardwalk;
2. The City is advised to undertake appropriate community consultation in the preparation of a new development application consistent with the approved plans, which represents a variation to the approved plans. The application should have the support of the community as a pre-requisite to lodgement with the WAPC;
3. The City is requested to lodge a new development application with the WAPC before the end of March 2010. An extension of time may be considered if sufficient progress has been made, although failure to progress the matter will result in the WAPC commencing enforcement action which may result in removal of the boardwalk;
4. The aluminium material used in construction of the boardwalk is suitable and acceptable and therefore no further modification is required in respect of materials used.
Comment
Response to WAPC’s letter
The following discussion outlines Administration’s response to the four key points raised in the WAPC’s letter.
1. The boardwalk does not comply with the approved plans and the WAPC will take enforcement action unless corrective action is taken.
Administration has already publicly acknowledged and previously drawn to both Council’s and the WAPC’s attention, the differences between the approved plans and constructed boardwalk. A plan showing the alignment of the approved boardwalk compared to the constructed boardwalk is included as Attachment 2.
Although not explicit in the WAPC’s letter, it is reasonable to assume that –
“corrective action” means the actions outlined in points 2 and 3 (the need to consult with the community and lodge a new development application to the WAPC); and
“enforcement action” means any action available to the WAPC under the Planning and Development Act 2005, which could eventually result in removal of the boardwalk.
In this regard, several enforcement options would be available to the WAPC under the Act; some of which (if pursued) would trigger a right of review (appeal) to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT).
2. Community consultation is required in the preparation of a new development application, which should have the support of the community prior to lodgement with the WAPC.
The exact terminology used in the WAPC’s letter to convey this point is somewhat obscure and states – “… community consultation in the preparation of a new development application consistent with the approved plans which represents a variation to the approved plans”. This sentence suggests on the one hand that community consultation should be undertaken to prepare a new development application that is consistent with the approved plans, and on the other hand that the application (although consistent with the approved plans) also represents a variation to the approved plans.
Given the context in which these words appear in the WAPC’s letter, it is assumed that the word “or” has been unintentionally omitted ahead of the words “which represents a variation”, such that community consultation should be undertaken in preparing a new development application that is either consistent with the approved plans, or which represents a variation to the approved plans. This assumption is supported by advice recently received from the Office of the Minister for Planning regarding his position on the Yanchep boardwalk. Based on this interpretation, the following comments are offered –
The degree of “community consultation” and the manner and extent to which any new development application should “have the support of the community” are entirely subjective and open to debate. To ensure that any consultation process undertaken by the City is not invalidated by a difference of interpretation or opinion between what was expected by the WAPC versus what is undertaken by the City, it will be essential to seek the WAPC’s endorsement of any consultation process before it is undertaken.
Administration recommends appointing a market research/community consultation firm(s) to develop and implement a plan for meaningful, structured and independent consultation and remove any potential or perception of bias in the delivery of the consultation plan. As well as a mail survey to all households in Yanchep, a range of opportunities could be provided for residents to receive information, seek clarification, ask questions and provide feedback.
This consultation exercise will be a time consuming process and, in line with the City’s previous experience, is not best undertaken over the Christmas/New Year period. At least 4 weeks would be required to adequately consult with stakeholders and special interest groups, in addition to the time required to draft the questions and have them endorsed by the WAPC. Clarification would also need to be obtained from the WAPC as to how it would measure whether the new application has “the support of the community”. The use of technology, on-site information sessions, widespread advertising and the development and costing of options are all critical to ensuring a broad and informed response during the consultation period.
In relation to the WAPC’s suggestion that community consultation would be required in the preparation of a new development application that is consistent with the approved plans, this is a curious statement given that there would legally be no need to prepare a new development application if the current boardwalk were brought into compliance with the approved plan.
To achieve this, the alignment of the boardwalk would need to be altered to comply with the approved alignment shown in Attachment 2. No change would be required to the material (aluminium) used in the construction of the boardwalk as the WAPC has confirmed its acceptance of that material. Consequently, there would technically be no need to undertake community consultation if the boardwalk was made to comply with the WAPC’s approval.
Notwithstanding the above, a portion of the approved boardwalk (at its northern end) cannot be built on its approved alignment, because it traverses a portion of privately owned vacant land (Lot 2, No. 32 Compass Circle). Even if the remainder of the boardwalk were reconstructed along the approved alignment, a new application (and therefore community consultation) would still be necessary for that portion of the boardwalk that needs to be realigned to avoid Lot 2.
Another important consideration affecting the City’s ability to reconstruct the boardwalk exactly along its approved alignment, is the fact that the levels approved by the WAPC for the boardwalk were relative to the topographical information shown on the plans submitted for approval. That topographical information has since proven to be inaccurate and not a true representation of the contours of the land. As such, the previously proposed and subsequently approved levels may also not be relevant. A detailed site survey that clearly maps both the horizontal and vertical alignment of the boardwalk will be essential in defining the precise form of development that is ultimately submitted to the WAPC for approval.
3. The City is requested to lodge a new development application with the WAPC before the end of March 2010.
It is highly unlikely that a robust and meaningful consultation exercise could be undertaken and a new development application endorsed by Council for lodgement with the WAPC by the end of March 2010. This is particularly the case when considering the additional clarification that must be sought from the WAPC and Administration’s recommendation to appoint an independent market research firm to undertake the consultation exercise.
Although Administration will make every effort to achieve the stated timeframe, an extension of time may be necessary, depending on the progress made. The WAPC’s letter confirms that an extension of time may be considered if sufficient progress has been made within that period.
4. The aluminium material used in construction of the boardwalk is suitable and acceptable.
The WAPC has reiterated its previous advice that the aluminium material used in the boardwalk’s construction is suitable and acceptable and therefore no modification to the materials is required. Consequently, the material used in the boardwalk’s construction would not be open for public comment, unless Council determines otherwise.
Request for copy of Confidential Report
On 25 November 2009 the City received correspondence from John Quigley MLA requesting (among other things) a copy of the information contained within the confidential report to Council on 17 November 2009.
Under subsection 5.95(3) of the Local Government Act 1995, confidential reports (other than a record of the decision made) and their attachments are not openly available for inspection, unless Council resolves, under subsection 5.95(7), that –
(a) The information contained therein is confidential but may be available for inspection; and
(b) Council resolves to make the information available for inspection.
Administration has no objection to making confidential report CR04-11/09 (and its attachments) publicly available for inspection, providing that Item 7 of the table under the “Detail” section of that report is ‘blacked out’ so as to not be legible, as it relates to confidential advice received from the City’s solicitor.
Comment
Administration recognises that the community was not informed of, or given the opportunity to comment on, an elevated aluminium boardwalk on the constructed alignment, despite extensive earlier consultation regarding path options. In light of this previous consultation, it would have been reasonable to consult with, or at least inform the Yanchep community of, the alternate material and alignment selected for the boardwalk, prior to its construction.
Considering the above, and given the degree of community interest in this matter, Administration supports taking the steps generally described by the WAPC to rectify this situation.
Statutory Compliance
The City of Wanneroo was required to obtain planning approval from the Western Planning Commission for the boardwalk under the Metropolitan Regional Scheme. This approval was obtained, although the boardwalk was not constructed in accordance with that approval. The WAPC has now provided its advice on the actions to be taken to rectify this situation.
In relation to the request for a copy of the confidential report to Council in November 2009, Council may resolve to make that report and accompanying information available for inspection, pursuant to subsection 5.95(7) of the Local Government Act 1995.
Strategic Implications
The construction of the Yanchep Boardwalk is strongly aligned to the City’s strategic objectives of improving conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas and minimising the impact of development on natural landform. In addition the Yanchep Boardwalk facilitates access to facilities that support inclusive communities.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Costs will be incurred in engaging a market research firm to undertake community consultation on this matter on behalf of the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. AGREES to prepare a new development application for an aluminium coastal boardwalk at Yanchep that, as far as practicable, corresponds with the alignment depicted on the Two Rocks Yanchep Foreshore Management Plan and approved by the Western Australian Planning Commission and AGREES to consult with the Yanchep community in the preparation of that application;
2. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to engage the services of an independent market research/community consultation firm(s) to assist the City in planning and undertaking the community consultation exercise on the Yanchep boardwalk development application, to the satisfaction of the Western Australian Planning Commission;
3. WRITES to the Western Australian Planning Commission seeking its clarification and confirmation of the extent of community consultation required to be undertaken in the preparation of a new development application for the Yanchep boardwalk and the manner in which the Commission will measure the support of the community for any such application;
4. REQUIRES Administration to submit a report back to Council to consider the results of the public consultation exercise and agree on a final development application prior to lodgement with the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
5. RESOLVES pursuant to subsection 5.95(7) of the Local Government Act 1995, to make confidential report CR04-11/09 (and its attachments) to Council’s 17 November 2009 meeting publicly available for inspection, subject to Item 7 of the table under the “Detail” section of that report being ‘blacked out’ so as to not be legible.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S14/0001
File Name: BA Air Conditioning for New Quinns Rocks Fire Station.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Darragh Wills
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the expenditure of $15,500 on the purchase and installation of air-conditioning for the newly built Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Station.
Background
The City has four Volunteer Bush Fire Brigades, one of which is located in Quinns Rocks. This is a large, committed and active brigade that provides a very professional level of service to the City. The Brigade’s current accommodation is extremely undersized and after several years of negotiations and planning a new station has been built in Hidden Valley Retreat, Clarkson.
This facility has been built with a combination of State Government, ESL (Emergency Services Levy) and Federal (EMA – Emergency Management Australia) grant funds. As Bush Fire Brigades belong to Local government, this facility is a Council asset. A considerable amount of work and materials have been donated by both the volunteers and the business community. The Brigade has also fundraised extensively for several years to fund the fit out of the new station.
Detail
Due to the increase in building costs since this project was first planned, air-conditioning could not be included in the initial building works. The sum of $15,500 was included for air conditioning in the City’s 2009/2010 Emergency Services Levy (ESL) grant application for capital costs of the City’s bush fire brigades. As there was no certainty that this item would be successful, it was not included in the City’s internal budget, process at that time.
The new station will be operational for the coming fire season and an official opening is currently being planned. Consequently, it is important that the air-conditioning be installed as soon as practicable.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The FESA ESL grants process has now been completed and the above mentioned $15,500 for air-conditioning was approved. The capital expenditure was not included in the City’s original budget process as funding approval had not been determined at that time. Given that the overall cost will be met by ESL funds, the eventual cost implications for the City are nil.
The building is an asset of the City and any improvements will increase the value of that asset. It is therefore recommended that Council considers and approves the expenditure for the purchase and installation of air-conditioning to provide a suitable work environment for the City Bush Fire Brigade Volunteers.
Statutory Compliance
Budget variation is in compliance with Part 6 – Financial management of the Local Government Act and Part 2 – General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Aligns with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 strategic outcomes by way of:
“Objective 2.4 4 Develop and implement a range of activities that promote community safety and wellbeing.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As this project was not included in the 2009/2010 Adopted Budget an ‘ABSOLUTE MAJORITY’ Council Approval is required to initiate the budget variation in accordance with Section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995 APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure of $15,500 for the purchase and installation of air conditioning at the new Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Station ; and
2. NOTES the following budget variations to fund the project outlined in Item 1:
PROJECT NO |
FROM |
TO |
DESCRIPTION |
912350-8999-501 |
$15,500 |
|
Grant Income |
PR-1985 |
|
$15,500 |
Quinns Rocks Fire Station |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S12/0024V01
File Name: BA New Food Act 2008.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Neil Harries
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
For Council to consider the effect of the introduction of the new Food Act 2008 will have on the assessment of food premises and determine what fees and charges are appropriate in the circumstances.
Background
The Food Act 2008 came into effect on the 23 October 2009 replacing the old food safety provisions under the Health Act 1911. This represents a significant shift in direction of food regulation and management in WA. The old system was prescriptive and subsequently very inflexible. The new Act provides for an outcome based approach and is consistent with other States nationally.
Under the old system premises that served ready to eat meals to members of the public could be classified as an Eating House. These premises could then be charged Licence and Registration fees depending on their type and a transfer fee when sold. As not all food premises provide ready to eat meals, not all food premises fell within this definition and consequently not all food premises have been paying fees. About 50% of food premises within the City were classified as Eating Houses. This financial year approximately $55 000 has been collected as fees and charges imposed on Eating Houses.
Detail
The new Act gives the enforcement agency (being the City of Wanneroo) the power to charge a fee under the Local Government Act 1995 for the performance of a function under the Food Act 2008. The main functions to be performed include approving plans for new premises and routinely inspecting premises once they are operating.
The new system is based on risk, with premises rated either High Risk, Medium Risk, Low Risk or Exempt (such as newsagents and chemists). High risk premises will need to be inspected more frequently than low risk premises. Eating House fees were a fee prescribed in the City’s Health Local Laws 1999. They were $250 for class 1 and 2, $190 for class 3 premises and $30 for a Transfer of Licence fee. Under the new system it will be discretionary to Council, to determine what charges it considers appropriate.
A set inspection fee based on the number of anticipated inspections is the fairest system to be introduced, as it most closely reflects the amount of involvement by the City. Based on guidelines from the Department of Health and information from other Councils, it is proposed to adopt the following inspection frequency:
· High Risk Premises - 3 times a year
· Medium Risk Premises - 2 times a year
· Low Risk Premises - once per year
· Exempt Premises – only where complaints are received
A review of the current listing of premises has indicated that there will be approximately 45 high risk, 300 medium risk, 55 low risk and an unknown number of exempt premises as this information was not previously required and registered.
If supported the proposed inspection frequency regime would equate to approximately 790 inspections required annually. As mentioned previously Council can determine what fee it believes is appropriate in the circumstance. Last year 501 food premise inspections were undertaken by the City’s Environmental Health Officers. Given the increase in inspections to be undertaken further resources in this area may be required upon further analysis.
To provide an indication of projected income for a range of scenarios, the following information is provided based on a set inspection fee for each inspection and in conjunction with the inspection frequency mentioned above;
· Option 1 – no fees charged
· Option 2 - $100 per inspection would see premises pay $100, $200 and $300 respectively based on risk and generate income of approximately $79 000.
· Option 3 - $125 per inspection would see premises pay $125, $250 and $375 respectively based on risk and generate income of approximately $98 750.
· Option 4 - $150 per inspection would see premises pay $150, $300 and $450 respectively based on risk and generate income of approximately $118 500.
Although these fees can be charged as soon as they are approved, given that many premises have already paid the Eating House Licence fees under the old system it is not proposed to implement these charges until the new financial year. This will also provide time for consultation with food premises that have not previously been charged fees. If appropriate certain premises such as charities and community groups can be exempt from these charges.
Consultation
The new Food Act has taken several years to develop. Consultation with food premises began in 2007 and City Officers have provided advice and information when requested. However the ability to fully inform food premises has been limited by a lack of confirmed information from the Department such as when exactly the Act would be gazetted. It is therefore possible that there are a number of food premises that are not aware of the change. In addition a number of food premises have not previously been charged any fees, as they were not classified as Eating Houses. It is proposed that administration will undertake a mail out to all food premises shortly with information of charges and fees once this is decided upon. This will allow food premises time to budget for the new changes.
Comment
For almost half the food premises any fee will be a new fee that they have not previously had to pay. Option 3 is considered to be the closest scenario to the current situation for most Eating House Licences and would see most of their fees remain the same. It is also recommended that the Application and Registration fee be the same as any Inspection fee for ease of processing. All food premise related inspection fees should also be made the same. All fees should be linked to the Consumer Price Index and adjusted accordingly in the future.
It is important to remember that unlike the previous licence fee, the new fees under the Local Government Act 1995 are a fee for service. Therefore if it is decided to charge an inspection fee it is important that the required inspection is undertaken.
Statutory Compliance
The Food Act 2008 places the City of Wanneroo as the Enforcement Agency in relation to food premises within its district and allows fees to be set under the Local Government Act 1995. The Food Act 2008 adopts The Local Government Act 1995 as the power to regulate the manner in which fees can be charged.
Strategic Implications
Aligns with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 strategic outcomes:
“Objective 2.4 – Improve community safety.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Previously, revenue of approximately $55,000 was generated from Eating House Licence fees. Option 3 of the proposed fee structure was selected as the most appropriate inspection charge, given that, the additional total yearly cost for a high risk premises at a cost of $125 per inspection, will equate to a total of $375 per year, based on 3 inspections. If adopted, the additional fees will generate revenue of approximately $98,750. In accordance with the provisions of The Local Government Act 1995, fees can be reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
ADOPTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY in accordance with Section 6.16(1) of the Local
Government Act 1995 the following fee structure commencing
1 July 2010 for the 2010/2011 financial year;
a) Food Premise Application and Registration Fee - $125
b) Food Premise Inspection Fee - $125 per inspection;
2. ADVERTISES in accordance with Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act 1995 its intention to introduce the Fees in 1.) above from 1 July 2010; and
3. AUTHORISES that all food premises within the City be notified as soon as possible of these changes which are to take effect in the new financial year.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0304
File Name: BA APPLICATION TO KEEP MORE THAN TWO doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Gemma Robinson
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an application for an exemption to Council’s Local Laws made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo’s Animals Local Law 1999 stipulates:
“A person shall not keep or permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a) 2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age; or
b) 6 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the premises are situated on a lot having an area of 4 hectares or more,
unless the premises are licensed as an approved kennel establishment or have been granted exemption pursuant to section 26 (3) of the Dog Act and have planning approval under the town planning scheme.”
Detail
The following application has been made under the Dog Act 1976 and are submitted for Council’s consideration:
Address of Applicant |
Description of Dogs |
4 Ottawa Way, Wanneroo |
Male sterilised black Border Collie Female sterilised black Border Collie Male unsterilised black Border Collie |
A Ranger has inspected the aforementioned property to ensure means exist on the premises at which the dog will ordinarily be kept for effectively confining the dog within the premises.
Address of Applicant |
Property Zoning |
Size of Property |
4 Ottawa Way, Wanneroo |
Residential |
0.0810 hectares |
Consultation
It has been the practice where applications have been received by the City to keep more than two dogs, that residents immediately adjoining the applicant’s property in question have been consulted by letter to ascertain if they have any objections.
Upon consultation with immediate adjoining neighbours two objections were received on the grounds of barking and excessive smell/odours. It has been the practice that when a barking dog complaint is received, a letter, information pack and a seven-day diary are sent to the complainant. If the seven-day diary is not completed and returned it is assumed that the barking is not considered to be a significant problem. To date a completed seven-day diary has not been returned. The investigating Ranger has advised that the excessive smell/odour was unfounded at the time of his inspection.
Comment
In considering this application for exemption, the following two options are available:
a) Council may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 subject to conditions; or
b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.
4 Ottawa Way, Wanneroo
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep more than two dogs at 4 Ottawa Way, Wanneroo. The applicant advises that the additional dog will be trained in Obedience, Tracking and Dog Dancing. The owner is currently instructing Dog Training Classes and is a “Dancing with Dogs” Judge. Due to health issues with the two current registered dogs the applicant is unable to maintain involvement as a judge and handler, however with the addition of the third dog this will allow her to continue with her commitments as a Trainer and Judge.
A check of the City’s records reveal that prior to this application being made, no complaints from residents have been received concerning the dogs.
The objecting neighbours have been advised of the City’s due process in relation to processing these requests and are aware of their opportunity to raise any further concerns in regard to this application.
The inspecting Ranger advises that the property is adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. The boundary fences are 1.8 metres high at the rear, 1.2 metres at the left side and 2 metres at the right side. The gate at the side is 1.5 metres high. Fences and gates are in compliance with regulations. The dogs are kept in a large sized yard and sleep in the house at night. The Ranger has recommended that an exemption to the City of Wanneroo’s Animals Local Law 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Statutory Compliance
These applications for exemption to Council’s Animals Local Law 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 have been detailed in this report.
Strategic Implications
Aligns with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 strategic outcomes:
“2.4 Improve Community Safety
2.4.4 Develop and implement a range of activities that promote community safety and well being.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. GRANTS an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep three dogs at 4 Ottawa Way, Wanneroo subject to the specified conditions:
a) If any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no replacement is to be obtained;
b) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum; and
c) This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered reasonable;
2. RESERVES THE RIGHT to vary or revoke, at any future date, the exemption given to the applicants should any relevant conditions be contravened; and
3. ADVISES the adjoining neighbours of this decision.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S24/0244V01
File Name: BA Pet Crematoruim and Animal Care Facility.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Ms Karen Caple
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the provision of a new Animal Care Facility with an associated Pet Crematorium in partnership with the City of Joondalup.
Background
Following a Motion on Notice presented at the 20 February 2007 Ordinary Council Meeting by Cr Rudi Steffens, provision was made in the City’s 2008/09 Budget to commission a feasibility study into the provision of a joint pet crematorium and animal care facility with the City of Joondalup. The outcomes of the feasibility study (Attachment 1) was subsequently presented at the Council Forum on 14 July 2009 by the Consultants engaged, CRL Consulting.
Detail
The Consultants in briefing Elected Members at the Forum in July this year outlined a number of key outcomes from their study:
· A joint venture animal care facility will provide a new, state of the art facility with costs spread over a wider rate base;
· Inclusion of a crematorium service gives both local governments an additional income stream;
· The crematorium service should significantly reduce the net cost of operation, which has the potential to further reduce costs;
· Servicing a potentially unmet demand within the community for an acceptable means of disposal of a pet;
· Efficiency gains for both local governments in the form of ranger staff time;
· A new differentiated facility gives an opportunity to reposition the image and practice of animal control within both local governments;
· The cremation service should only be added if a new animal care facility is going to be constructed; and
· A number of sites were identified, with the main option being the existing Ashby Operations Centre.
At this Forum discussion also focussed upon the current global economic environment and budget needs and priorities of the City.
Since this time discussions have occurred at an Administration level both with the City of Joondalup and Mindarie Regional Council, to explore possible locations for the facility and discuss a range of matters in relation to the provision of such a facility.
The City of Joondalup appears unable to provide any land parcels for use, and would prefer the City to run the facility as a service provision to them, as they currently outsource their services to the RSPCA. The City of Joondalup also had a greater need in relation to housing cats given the recent introduction of their new Cat Local Law, however it is understood this has subsequently been rescinded. The Mindarie Regional Council has also been contacted in relation to both the provision of land, or a possible owner operator model for such a facility.
Comment
Administration has been focussing on the current concurrent priorities of enabling, via tender, the provision of Community Safety Patrols and a Close Circuit Television Network (CCTV) for the City, and as such has not actively pursued this possible future City facility in the past four months.
It is recommended that more formal discussions and correspondence be entered into with both of these parties to enable this project to be considered in budget discussions for 2010/11 and the associated 10 years plans.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The provision of such a facility is associated with the following Objectives of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“Objective 2.4 Improve Community Safety
Objective 3.2 Improve Regional Infrastructure”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
No budget provision for this facility has been identified in the City’s 10 Year Capital Works Plan.
Administration further advises that upon further review of the Feasibility Study undertaken by CRL Consulting, it does not agree to the Operating Budget shown on page 7 of 11 within the Attachment, and that any future budget bid will require a re-examination of these figures.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RESOLVES not to pursue independently, the establishment of a Pet Crematorium and Animal Care Facility;
2. REQUESTS the Mindarie Regional Council investigate the feasibility of establishing a Pet Crematorium and Animal Care Facility for Member Councils; and
3. REQUESTS Administration to provide a copy of the Feasibility Study undertaken by CRL Consulting to the Mindarie Regional Council.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 1 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 2 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 3 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 4 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 5 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 6 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 7 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 8 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 9 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 10 of 11
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 11 of 11
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S07/0311V01
File Name: BA Safer Suburbs and Wanneroo Townsite CCTV Projects.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Coordinator Rangers, Safety and Emergency Management
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the evaluation of Tender 09038 Safer Suburbs CCTV Project and Tender 09039 Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Project.
Background
In 2008 the City of Wanneroo (the City) was successful in receiving funding of $1,000,000 for the design and implementation of a strategy for CCTV within the City, under the Commonwealth Government’s Safer Suburbs Plan. To this end, an agreement was signed between the Department of the Attorney General and the City in November 2008.
Under the terms of the Agreement, the project is comprised of two phases:
1. To conduct a feasibility study to develop a design and implementation strategy for the installation of CCTV within the City; and
2. The installation of CCTV systems inclusive of ‘mobile CCTV solutions’ being considered, in conjunction with the commencement of Community Patrols.
In addition the City was awarded a State Government grant for a CCTV project focussing on the Wanneroo Town Centre, which was considered by Council on 30 June 2009 (CD11-06/09). Expenditure of $160,000 was approved for this project.
CCTV locations for the Safer Suburbs and Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Projects were reported to Council on 13 October 2009 as follows:
Girrawheen – The area bounded by Marangaroo Drive, Balgonie Avenue and Templeton Crescent, this includes the Newpark Shopping Centre, TAB, Tavern, Saigon Business Centre and various fast food outlets. Incidents of crime being experienced in this area consist of antisocial behaviour, graffiti, vandalism, theft, and hooning.
Marangaroo - Paloma Park and the Alexander Heights Community Centre. A CCTV camera currently exists in Paloma Park with footage recorded at the Alexander Heights Community Centre. It is suggested that this camera is upgraded and additional cameras placed to increase the capability for this area. Incidents being experienced in this area consist of assaults, robberies, antisocial behaviour, graffiti, vandals, theft and hoon behavior
Clarkson - Ocean Keys Boulevard between Key Largo Drive and Connelly Drive and the area of the road leading to the railway station and around the Whale and Ale Tavern and Clarkson Youth Centre. Incidents being experience in this area consist of hooning, antisocial behaviour, graffiti, theft, drunken and disorderly conduct, and general crime incidents.
In addition to the above, four mobile units are also proposed as part of the Safer Suburbs Project for installation in patrol vehicles for Community Safety Patrols.
In regard to the Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Project, a series of cameras are being suggested for placement to cover vehicle and pedestrian movements in Dundebar Road, Civic Drive, Wanneroo Road and Rocca Way.
Council at its meeting of 13 October 2009, considered a report (Item CB05-10/09) Provision of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Systems and adopted the following resolutions;
“That Council:-
1. NOTES the identified locations and mobile applications that have been selected to support the installation of CCTV systems within the City;
2. APPROVES of advertising three tenders for the provision of CCTV equipment associated with the Safer Suburbs Project (Federal Grant Program) and Wanneroo Town Centre Project and instructs the Chief Executive Officer to proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995; and
3. DELEGATE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to determine the CCTV Equipment Tenders in accordance with the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 (in addition to the current delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders to a maximum of $250,000) up to a combined value of $890,000.”
The City subsequently completed tender specifications and advertised for the design, supply and installation of CCTV for both projects. The tenders closed on 10 November 2009.
Detail
Tenders 09038 (Safer Suburbs CCTV Project) and 09039 (Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Project) were advertised on Saturday 21 October 2009 and closed on Tuesday 10 November 2009.
Submissions were received for both tenders from the companies listed below:
· Orion Integration P/L
· Audio Visual ImageNation P/L
· MCS Security Group P/L
· Zenien as trustee for the Astuta Trust trading as Zenien
· Prestige Alarms
· Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L
· Seme Electrical Engineering and
· Chubb Electronic Security
Tender Evaluation
A Tender Evaluation Team (TET) was established comprising of a Security Consultant, the City’s Manager Regulatory Services, Coordinator Rangers, Safety and Emergency Management, Community Safety and Emergency Management Officer and the City’s Contract Officer.
The tenders were assessed and evaluated against the following criteria;
· Price for products and systems offered (40%);
· Previous experience (25%): and
· Appreciation for the Project Proposal (35%).
The TET members evaluated the submissions separately and met as a group to discuss and combine the scoring attributed to each tender. Each category of the Selection Criteria was awarded a point score based on the information supplied within the submitted tender.
Tenders Excluded
The tender submission from Audio Visual ImageNation P/L was excluded, as the tenderer did not supply company registration details, namely a current security licence, as required in schedule 5. MCS Security failed to provide a detailed methodology and proposed equipment for the project, as required in schedule 3.
The tenders were considered in three parts:
· Fixed CCTV systems for Safer Suburbs CCTV Project
· Mobile CCTV system for the Safer Suburbs CCTV Project and
· Wanneroo Townsite CCTV Project.
The same TET considered all tenders.
Tender 09038 – Fixed CCTV Systems
Price for products and systems offered
This was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer that gave a fixed price for:
· 1A Preliminaries which included design costs, operation manuals, training, as built drawings, safety and traffic management, defects and maintenance provision; and
· 1B Price for fixed cameras and system requirements inclusive of all hardware and software and monitoring room equipment.
Tenderer |
Base Tender Price |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
$485,220.00 |
2 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
$477,900.00 |
4 |
Prestige Alarms |
$726,244.00 |
6 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
$696,418.00 |
5 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
$440,299.00 |
1 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
$595,342.00 |
3 |
This criterion represented 40% of the total score.
Previous experience
The tenders were also assessed on the tenderers previous experience with similar projects and their relevant experience, resulting in the following ranking according to the information provided.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
2 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
3 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
4 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
1 |
This criterion represented 25% of the total score.
Appreciation for the Project proposal
Tenderers were assessed on their detailed methodology, proposed equipment and safety provisions in regard to the project in its entirety. The ranking given was as a result of the information provided.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
2 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
4 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
1 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
3 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
3 |
This criterion represented 35% of the total.
Overall Weighted Score
The tender evaluation team scored each tender against the previously determined criteria. The overall ranking of the tenderer based on weighted score is as follows;
Tenderer |
Rank |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Orion Integration P/L |
3 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
4 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
5 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
6 |
Based on the above evaluation, the fixed CCTV tender submitted by Prestige Alarms submitted for $726,244.00 is considered to be the best value for money and project proposal for the City.
Tender 09038 – Mobile CCTV Systems
Price for products and systems offered
This was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer that gave a fixed price for;
· 1C Price for Mobile cameras inclusive of system software and hardware
Tenderer |
Base Tender Price |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
$48,000.00 |
1 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
$170,173.00 |
6 |
Prestige Alarms |
$134,470.00 |
3 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
$136,268.00 |
4 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
$97,440.00 |
2 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
$162,180.00 |
5 |
This criterion represented 40% of the total score.
Previous experience
The tenders were assessed on the tenderers previous experience with similar projects and key personnel and their relevant experience.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
3 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
2 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
2 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
2 |
This criterion represented 25% of the total score.
Appreciation for the Project proposal
Tenderers were assessed on their detailed methodology, proposed equipment and safety provisions in regard to the project in its entirety and were ranked as follows based on information provided.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Orion Integration P/L |
3 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
2 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
2 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
2 |
This criterion represented 35% of the total.
Overall Weighted Score
The tender evaluation Team scored each tender against the previously determined criteria. The overall ranking of the tenderer based on weighted score is as follows;
Tenderer |
Rank |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Orion Integration P/L |
2 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
3 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
4 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
5 |
Astuta Trust Trading As Zenien |
6 |
Based on the above evaluation, the tender for mobile CCTV submitted by Prestige Alarms for $134,470.00 is considered to be the best value for money.
Tender 09039 – Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Systems
Tenders Excluded
Astuta Trust trading as Zenien was excluded from this tender due to not providing a signed tender form. The tender submission from Audio Visual ImageNation P/L was excluded as the tenderer did not supply company registration details, namely a current security licence, as required in schedule 5 and MCS Security failed to provide a detailed methodology and proposed equipment for the project, as required in schedule 3 and was also excluded.
Price for products and systems offered
This was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer that gave a fixed price for:
1A Preliminaries which included design costs, operation manuals, training, as built drawings, safety and traffic management and a defects and maintenance provision; and
1B Price for fixed cameras and system requirements inclusive of all hardware and software.
Tenderer |
Base Tender Price |
Rank |
Orion Integration P/L |
$144,060.00 |
1 |
Prestige Alarms |
$179,310.00 |
4 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
$182,786.00 |
5 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
$161,909.00 |
2 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
$164,111.00 |
3 |
This criterion represented 40% of the total score.
Previous experience
The tenders were assessed on the tenderers previous experience with similar projects and key personnel and their relevant experience.
Tenderer |
Score |
Orion Integration P/L |
2 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
3 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
1 |
This criterion represented 25% of the total score.
Appreciation for the Project proposal
Tenderers were assessed on their detailed methodology, proposed equipment and safety provisions in regard to the project in its entirety and were ranked according to the information provided.
Tenderer |
Rank |
Orion Integration P/L |
2 |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
1 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
3 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
3 |
This criterion represented 35% of the total.
Overall Weighted Score
The tender evaluation Team scored each tender against the previously determined criteria. The overall ranking of the tenderer based on weighted score is as follows;
Tenderer |
Rank |
Prestige Alarms |
1 |
Downer Edi Engineering Power P/L |
2 |
Orion Integration P/L |
3 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
4 |
Seme Electrical Engineering |
5 |
Based on the above evaluation, the fixed CCTV tender for the Wanneroo Town Centre submitted by Prestige Alarms for $179,310.00 is considered to be the best value for money.
Consultation
Amlec House Security Consultants assisted in the tender selection process to verify the technical specifications as contained in the tender documentation as part of the Tender Evaluation Team.
Comment
The tender evaluation has been undertaken in accordance with the selection criteria outlined in the tender documents and the City’s requirements. However, in evaluating the tenders the value of products and services offered has exceeded the estimated $890,000 previously delegated to the Chief Executive Officer. Approval is therefore sought from Council in determining both tenders.
The Tender Evaluation Team are of the opinion that the proposal submitted by Prestige Alarms will deliver the performance and functionality required by the City. Whilst the initial cost of the design, supply and installation of the system is greater than other tenders, the benefits this system will provide in terms of end operating cost and reliability can justify the initial expenditure.
Of particular note in the submission from Prestige was a 36-month warranty provided for equipment compared to 12 months provided by other tenders. The level of detail provided and the functionality of the system and monitoring room provision was also considered of a high quality in comparison to other tenders.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tender procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Governance and Executive Services has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process.
Strategic Implications
The installation of a CCTV system within the City is linked to Section 2.4 of the City’s 2006-2021 Strategic Plan outcome objective:
“Social 2.4 Improve Community Safety”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The costs of the design, supply and installation of fixed and mobile CCTV systems as described in the tender documents for the Safer Suburbs CCTV Project is estimated to cost $860,714.00. These funds are available under the grant provided to the City by the Federal Attorney General.
The estimated cost for the design supply and installation of CCTV equipment for the Wanneroo Town Centre is $179,310, which exceeds the available Office of Crime Prevention grant of $160,000. Contact with the Office of Crime Prevention has established that additional funds are not available and a request to the Minister will be considered to secure the additional funds. An alternative option is to reduce the number of cameras to be utilised in the Town Centre project from 8 to 6, which is supported by Administration. As such the tender is recommended to be capped at $160,000.
The total combined tender costs for the Safer Suburbs and Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Projects is $1,040,024.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS Tender 09038 from Prestige Alarms for the Design, Supply and Installation of fixed and mobile CCTV system for the Safer Suburbs CCTV Project at a total cost of $860,714; and
2. ACCEPTS Tender 09039 from Prestige Alarms for the Design, Supply and Installation of a CCTV system for the Wanneroo Town Centre CCTV Project capped to a maximum value of $160,000.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0005V01
File Name: CA Tender Evaluation for Provision of Safety Patrols 09037.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Coordinator Rangers, Safety and Emergency Management
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the evaluation of Tender 09037 Provision of Community Safety Patrols.
Background
In 2008 Administration carried out a community perceptions survey to evaluate and monitor performance across a range of services and facilities undertaken by the City. Results of that survey clearly indicated that ‘Safety and Security’ was one of the community’s major concerns and priorities.
Given the survey results and community concerns, administration subsequently undertook a review of the City’s Community Safety Program and explored the potential for the reintroduction of Community Safety Patrols. This was reported to Council at its meeting of 30 June 2009 (CD13-06/09). In reintroducing the safety patrols it was considered that this program would significantly complement the Federal Government funded CCTV Program which is also proposed to be introduced in the near future across the City.
Council at its meeting of 13 October 2009 resolved:
“That Council:-
1. APPROVES of advertising a tender for the provision of a Community Patrol
Service, and instructs the Chief Executive Officer to proceed in accordance with
the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995;
2. DELEGATE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the
authority to determine the Community Safety Patrol Tender in accordance with
the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 (in addition
to the current delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders
to a maximum of $250,000) up to the value of $450,000; and
3. NOTES the branding of the vehicles as depicted in Attachment 1 of this report.
CARRIED BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY”
The City subsequently completed tender specifications and advertised for the provision of Community Safety Patrol Services for a period of 12 months with an option for up to an additional two years providing performance indicators are met and there is a high level of community satisfaction with the Patrol Service.
In evaluating the submitted tenders, it recently became apparent that the tender value exceeded the Chief Executive Officers $450,000 limit provided by Council’s Resolution of 13 October 2009. Accordingly this report is seeking Councils approval for this tender.
Detail
Tender 09037 for the Provision of Community Safety Patrol Services was advertised on Saturday 17 October 2009 and closed on Tuesday 10 November 2009.
Twelve tenders were received, listed as follows:
· Southern Cross Protection P/L
· Accord Security P/L
· Newcrest Security Investigations P/L
· Charter Security Group P/L
· National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services
· MSS Security P/L
· Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities
· MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services
· Wilson Security
· Australian Asset Protection P/L
· PC Security and
· Jaguar Security Services
Tender Evaluation
A Tender Evaluation Team (TET) was established comprising of the Officer in Charge of Wanneroo Police Sub-Division, the City’s Manager Regulatory Services, the Coordinator Rangers, Safety and Emergency Management, the City’s Community Safety and Emergency Management Officer and the City’s Contracts Officer who provided guidance on policy and protocol issues.
The tenders were assessed and evaluated against the following criteria:
· Price for services offered (40%);
· Previous experience in a Safety Patrol Environment (20%);
· Staffing resources available for this contract, inclusive of key personnel and relevant experience, qualifications (20%); and
· Safety Management (20%).
The TET members evaluated the submissions separately and met as a group to discuss and combine the scoring attributed to each tender. Each category of the Selection Criteria was awarded a point score based on the information supplied within the submitted tender.
Tenders Excluded
The tender submission from PC Security was excluded as the tenderer failed to supply appropriate Security Licence details as required in schedule 5.
· Price for products and systems offered
The above was assessed on the price schedules submitted by each tenderer that gave a fixed price for;
· The provision of a Safety Patrol Officer, during normal contracted hours (6.00pm to 6.00am) in accordance with the specification;
· The provision of a Safety Patrol Supervisor, during normal contracted hours (6.00pm to 6.00am) in accordance with the specification;
· The provision of a Safety Patrol Officer for additional hours; and
· The provision of a Safety Patrol supervisor for additional hours.
The price was calculated on providing a service of three patrol officers and a supervisor (336 hours in total per week) over a 12 month period.
Tenderer |
Price |
Ranking |
Southern Cross Protection P/L |
$636,151.00 |
7 |
Accord Security P/L |
$549,690.00 |
2 |
Newcrest Security Investigations P/L |
$674,520.00 |
10 |
Charter Security Group P/L |
$667,731.00 |
9 |
National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services |
$675,762.00 |
11 |
MSS Security P/L |
$635,88.40 |
6 |
Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities |
$619,332.00 |
5 |
MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services |
$564,713.40 |
3 |
Wilson Security |
$660,807.60 |
8 |
Australian Asset Protection P/L |
$579,036.00 |
4 |
Jaguar Security Services |
$528,885.00 |
1 |
This criterion represented 40% of the total score.
· Previous experience in a Safety Patrol Environment
The tenders were assessed on the tenderers previous experience in the provision of safety patrol services.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Southern Cross Protection P/L |
4 |
Accord Security P/L |
2 |
Newcrest Security Investigations P/L |
5 |
Charter Security Group P/L |
4 |
National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services |
3 |
MSS Security P/L |
3 |
Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities |
5 |
MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services |
2 |
Wilson Security |
1 |
Australian Asset Protection P/L |
3 |
Jaguar Security Services |
5 |
This criterion represented 20% of the total score.
· Staffing resources available for this contract
Tenderers were asked to provide staffing resources available for this contract, inclusive of key personnel and their relevant experience and qualifications.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Southern Cross Protection P/L |
4 |
Accord Security P/L |
1 |
Newcrest Security Investigations P/L |
4 |
Charter Security Group P/L |
4 |
National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services |
3 |
MSS Security P/L |
1 |
Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities |
3 |
MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services |
3 |
Wilson Security |
2 |
Australian Asset Protection P/L |
3 |
Jaguar Security Services |
4 |
This criterion represented 20% of the total score.
· Safety Management
Tenderers were asked to provide an overview of the status of the tenderer’s safety management system inclusive of the number of loss time injuries, working days lost due to injury and any safety audits.
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Southern Cross Protection P/L |
4 |
Accord Security P/L |
2 |
Newcrest Security Investigations P/L |
6 |
Charter Security Group P/L |
3 |
National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services |
3 |
MSS Security P/L |
1 |
Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities |
6 |
MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services |
5 |
Wilson Security |
1 |
Australian Asset Protection P/L |
3 |
Jaguar Security Services |
5 |
This criterion represented 20% of the total score.
Overall Weighted Score
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each tender against the previously determined criteria. The overall ranking of the tenderer’s based on weighted score is as follows;
Tenderer |
Ranking |
Southern Cross Protection P/L |
8 |
Accord Security P/L |
1 |
Newcrest Security Investigations P/L |
11 |
Charter Security Group P/L |
7 |
National Investigation Services of Australia T/As Meridian Services |
6 |
MSS Security P/L |
3 |
Navigator P/L T/As Navsec Securities |
10 |
MCW Corporation P/L T/As Perth Security Services |
5 |
Wilson Security |
2 |
Australian Asset Protection P/L |
4 |
Jaguar Security Services |
9 |
Based on the above evaluation, the tender for Provision of Safety Patrol Services submitted by Accord Security P/L for $549,690.00 is considered to be the best value for money.
Consultation
This tender was evaluated in consultation with representation from the Western Australian Police Service (WA Police ).
Comment
The tender evaluation has been undertaken in accordance with the selection criteria outlined in the City’s tender documents. The Senior Sergeant, of Wanneroo Police Sub-District assisted in assessing the technical specifications as contained in the Tender documentation.
The Tender Evaluation Team agreed unanimously that Accord Security P/L have the relevant experience and resources to ensure an effective service can be provided. Relevant key performance indicators and evaluation of the service will be undertaken on a regular basis by Officers of the City to ensure compliance and contractual requirements are met.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The Tender procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Governance and Executive Services has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process.
Strategic Implications
The provision of Community Safety Patrols within the City is consistent with Section 2.4 of the City’s 2006-2021 Strategic Plan outcome objective:
“Social 2.4 Improve Community Safety”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
It was estimated that an approximate cost for a four officer service to undertake the Community Safety Patrols, seven days per week for a 12-month period was within the vicinity of $450,000. Tender submissions now accurately indicate that the service will cost $550,000 per annum for a four officer service operating from 6.00pm to 6.00am seven days a week.
Council at its meeting of 26 June 2009, resolved in it’s 10 year strategic financial management plan for the year ending 30 June 2010 to include $250,000 for the introduction of the Safety Patrols.
The operating cost of the service per month equates to $45,833. Given the anticipated commencement date for the service is now at the end of January 2010, expenditure of approximately $229,000 will be required from the approved 2009/2010 financial budget.
It is noted that the remaining 7 months of service provision within the contract estimated to cost $321,000 for 2010/2011 will need to be included in the 2010/2011 budget process and as the contract is for a 12 month period with an option for a further two years dependent on satisfactory performance and community satisfaction, additional funds need to be provided if any additional contract period is granted.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Accord Security P/L for the Provision of Community Safety Patrols for a period of 12 months at a cost of $550,000 with an option for a further two years dependent on satisfactory performance.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02/0105V01
File Name: AA TAMALA PARK COASTAL RESERVE TENURE AND MANAGEMENT .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Manager Assets Management
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a proposal from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to create a regional park between Mindarie and Burns Beach with the City of Wanneroo responsible for the coastal reserve bordering the regional park within the City’s boundaries.
Background
On 12 February 2008 and 6 June 2008, Council received two
separate petitions requesting the installation of a coastal dual use path
between Mindarie and Burns Beach. At its meeting on
1 July 2008, Council resolved: ( IN01-07/08 Refers).
“1. APPLIES to the State Government to amalgamate the parcels of land reserved ‘Parks and Recreation’ in the Metropolitan Region Scheme between Burns Beach and Mindarie, west of Marmion Avenue and create a Regional Park under the care, control and maintenance of the Department of Environment and Conservation;
2. REQUESTS the State Government to develop a management and infrastructure implementation plan for this proposed regional park, incorporating a shared pathway between Burns Beach and Mindarie and associated facilities;
3. SEEKS the support of the City of Joondalup for the proposal; and
4. ADVISE the petition organisers of the Council’s decision.”
The WAPC has agreed to create the regional park and is now seeking Council’s agreement to accept care and control of the coastal reserve abutting the regional park.
Detail
The WAPC’s proposal will create a new coastal conservation park between Burns Beach to the south and Mindarie to the north and Marmion Avenue to the east, comprising approximately 380 hectares of high quality coastal vegetation located entirely within Bush Forever site #322. The WAPC letter and plan are shown as Attachment 1.
The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure has approved the formation of a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) to the WAPC to prepare an Establishment Plan outlining the land tenure and the long-term management of the primary conservation values within the park.
The park will be managed by the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC). The CAC membership includes the City’s Deputy Mayor, Cr Roberts and Coordinator Environmental Planning.
The WAPC and CAC are seeking in principle agreement from the City to the following:
1. The City continuing to manage Coastal Reserve 35890, which is within the proposed park;
2. The City continuing to manage a part of Coastal Reserve 20561, which is also within the proposed park, for the future establishment of recreational areas and associated infrastructure; and
3. The land parcel of high conservation value within Reserve 20561 being revested to the Conservation Commission and managed by DEC.
Refer to Attachment 2 for a plan showing the current and proposed land responsibilities.
The Establishment Plan and 10-year Management Plan will address the details related to land tenure and management responsibilities. These plans will be developed in conjunction with the City, WAPC and CAC with a primary consideration given to protection of sensitive foredunes and coastal vegetation.
It is also proposed that a shared coastal dual-use pathway will be constructed from Burns Beach to Mindarie on the boundary between the coastal recreational reserve and the core conservational park. The path is considered to form part of the strategic coastal linkage and provide significant benefit to the local community.
The City of Joondalup considered this proposal at its meeting in July 2009 (CJ165-07/09) and gave in principle support for the proposal for the immediate Foreshore Reserve, not the land between the foreshore Reserve and the Regional Park. Refer Attachment 3 for City of Joondalup’s letter and resolution.
Comment
This proposal will provide better access to the coastline to allow the recreational values of the area to be utilised, as requested by the local community. The coastline of the proposed park includes some clean sandy beaches that have been identified safe for coastal recreation by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure coastal engineering study and by a study conducted by Surf Lifesaving WA.
The proposed new park will create an east-west bushland corridor from the Neerabup National Park to the coast and protect the integrity, function and environmental values of remaining dunal systems within the northern Metropolitan Areas.
Similar to the resolution by the City of Joondalup, the City of Wanneroo should only be responsible for the land that serves a recreational purpose and the remaining sections of Reserves 20561 and 35890 should be included within the proposed Regional Reserve, with the boundary of the Foreshore Reserve to be negotiated with the WAPC, with a possible area indicated on Attachment 2. It may therefore not be appropriate that the route of the coastal path lie within land that will remain under the control of the City of Wanneroo.
Statutory Compliance
Environmental Protection Act 1986
Planning and development Act 2005
Metropolitan Regional Scheme
Strategic Implications
The proposed creation of a new conservation reserve is consistent with the following goals and strategies of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“Environmental
1.1 Improve conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas
1.4 Minimise impact of development on natural landforms
1.5 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
Social
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and life style options
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation
2.5 Improve transport options and connections”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The establishment of the coastal foreshore path, beach accesses, any change rooms and parking facilities should be provided as part of the establishment of the reserves and do not require funding solely by the City of Wanneroo ratepayers
Funds are not currently included into the Foreshore Management Program of the City’s 10-year Capital Works Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT AGREE to continue to maintain the Coastal Crown Reserve 35890 in accordance with the current Management Order; only that section remaining within a revised Foreshore Reserve to be agreed with the Western Australian Planning Commission;
2. PROVIDES in principle agreement to maintain the part of Coastal Crown Reserve 20561 remaining within a revised Foreshore Reserve in accordance with the current Management Order; and
3. REQUESTS that the Management Order for the remaining part of the Coastal Crown Reserves 20561 and 35890 be revested to the Conservation Commission by Western Australian Planning Commission;
4. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) that retention of the Management Order in the Foreshore Reserves is conditional on the State Government confirming that the cost for the construction and maintenance of the proposed dual-use path will be borne by the Department of Environment and Conservation or the WAPC, the path route will not be on the Foreshore Reserve created from Reserves 35890 and 20561 and that the path will be a direct connection between the existing path network along the coastline;
5. LISTS additional funds for inclusion in the City’s Draft Ten Year Capital Works Program for future coastal recreational facilities within the area; and
6. NOTES that the City of Joondalup and Tamala Park Regional Council will be advised of Council’s resolution.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S13/0086V01
File Name: AA RE ALLOCATION OF FORESHORE FUNDS IN THE CURRENT BUDGET AND THE REFLECTION OF CHANGES ON THE 10 YEAR CAPITAL WORKS PR.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Tanja Lambe
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider amendments to the 2009-2010 Foreshore Management Capital Works Program.
Background
The adopted Foreshore Management Plans (FMP’s) for Mindarie-Quinns Rock and Two Rocks –Yanchep coastal areas identifies the need for several beach accesses. Most of the access ways in this area are still informal, however some formal accesses have been installed under either capital works enhancement programs or as part of sub-divisional works.
Funds have been allocated in the Foreshore Management Capital Works Program for the design of beach accesses at Quinns Rock, Two Rocks and Yanchep. With recent erosion of the frontal dunes, some of the existing formal beach accesses have deteriorated structurally and now require either extensive upgrading or total replacement, whilst other locations are now considered to be unsuitable for a permanent access.
The following projects are included in the 2009/10 Budget, of which two locations have been impacted by the erosion leaving only the proposed beach access at Yanchep being considered to remain feasible for constructing a permanent access:
Project No |
Description |
Funds |
PR 1487 |
Quinns Rock Foreshore – North Quinns Rocks - Design and consultation for the upgrade of existing beach access stairs opposite 208 Ocean Drive |
$19,400 |
PR 1909 |
Construction of Beach Access Stairs opposite 208 Ocean Drive |
$100,000 |
PR 1453 |
Yanchep Foreshore North – Install beach access fencing |
$29,100 |
Detail
There are a number of other beach access points recommended by approved FMP’s and not affected by beach erosion problems which could be brought forward in the program of works. These are summarised below:
Beach Access – Camira Way, Quinns Rocks (Attachment 1)
While the beach at this location is subject to seasonal erosion, it is controlled by a groyne, providing protection for future infrastructure. This is a well used path to the dog beach and a more permanent and safe structure is supported.
Beach Access from Queenscliffe Park (Attachment 2)
This is a well used path to the beach from Queenscliffe Park, however there is a need to provide an improved structure at the western end.
Beach Access opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep (Attachment 3)
Funding has been approved in the budget for the installation of fencing at this location. It is considered that these funds would provide a greater benefit to the community if reallocated towards the upgrade of the beach access at this location
Comment
The additional expenditure on design of the beach accesses is essential to undertake an analysis of coastal processes as part of the design procedure, to ensure that in future, coastal infrastructure is constructed in a manner that will accommodate the natural movement of the shoreline. It is also necessary to produce these designs at least a year in advance of construction to provide adequate time for obtaining the approvals required under various legislation.
Administration supports these amendments to the current Foreshore Budget and the 10-year Capital Works Program to reflect these changes. The proposed changes in expenditure of funds will provide better long-term outcomes for coastal accesses for local residents and public in general.
Statutory Compliance
The budget variation is in compliance with Part 6 - Financial Management of the Local Government Act and Part 2 - General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996
Strategic Implications
The design and construction for the projects proposed as part of the City’s Draft 10-year Capital Works Program are consistent with the following goals and strategies of the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“Environmental
1.6 Minimise impact of development on natural landforms
1.7 Improve the physical quality of the built environment
Social
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and life style options”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The changes have no overall impact on the current budget. Additional funds will be required to be included into the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program. It is noted that funding has been allocated in 2011/2012 for the construction of the beach access opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DELETES the following projects from the 2009/2010 Foreshore Management Capital Works Program:
a) Design and construction of a beach access stairs opposite 208 Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks (Project Nos 1487 and 1909); and
b) Installation of beach access fencing opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep.
2. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure of $148,500 for the following projects:
a) Design of beach access near Camira Way, Quinns Rocks;
b) Design of beach access Queenscliff Park Quinns Rocks; and
c) Design of beach access opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep .
3. NOTES the following budget variations to fund the projects outlined in Item 2:
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
PR 1487 |
$19,400 |
|
Quinns Rocks Foreshore design and consultation for the upgrade of existing beach access stairs opposite 208 Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks |
PR 1909 |
$100,000 |
|
Construction and upgrade of existing beach access stairs opposite 208 Ocean Drive, Quinns Rocks |
PR - TBA |
|
$35,000 |
Design of beach access from Queenscliff Park, Quinns Rocks |
PR - TBA |
|
$84,400 |
Design and part construction of beach access near Camira Way, Quinns Rocks |
PR – 1453 |
$29,100 |
|
Install beach access fencing opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep |
PR – TBA |
|
$29,100 |
Design of beach access opposite 40 Brazier Road, Yanchep |
4. NOTES that the City’s Draft Ten Year Capital Works Program will need to be amended to provide for the construction of a beach access near Camira Way and Queenscliffe Park, Quinns Rocks.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S02/0009V01
File Name: AA Replacement Caravan for the Driver Reviver Program.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Karen Delves
Meeting Date: 17 November 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the replacement of the current Driver/Reviver Caravan.
Background
The Driver/Reviver program is a national campaign sponsored by Bushells Tea, which encourages drivers to take a rest and provides a welcome break from driving with a free coffee and tea, cordial and a snack for travellers.
The City of Wanneroo Driver/Reviver Station is located on Wanneroo Road, 1.5km south of Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks and operates at peak holiday periods, such as public holidays and long weekends. The Driver/Reviver Station was initiated by the City in 2000 and aims to reduce drive fatigue by providing refreshment to drivers utilising Wanneroo Road.
Since its inception volunteers have provided this service to road users without having a support vehicle to convey the necessary equipment to and from the dedicated site. In 2003 through the Ministry of Justice a 1975 Coronet 22 foot caravan was donated to the City. Through dedicated volunteers and support from sponsors the caravan was restored to a safe roadworthy condition, for the primary use of transporting equipment and providing shelter for the volunteers who man this facility.
The Driver/Reviver caravan has been instrumental to the program by not only transporting equipment to the site but also providing shelter for the volunteers and has made a visual difference in encouraging motorists, to stop and take a break or simply a place to chat with friendly volunteers.
The caravan is now 34 years old and is starting to show its age with a number of repairs continuing to be carried out by volunteers when out at the site and more recently at the Ashby Operations Centre’s Mechanical Workshop. In addition, the caravan does not hold any toilet facilities with volunteers having to use the pine plantation on either side of the road. In January 2009 a major fire swept through the area and also to the north and south of the dedicated site and shortly thereafter CALM cut down all the trees, providing no cover. Currently this situation has not changed.
At the Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group meeting held on Wednesday 19 August 2009 this issue was discussed with the following resolutions:
“That the Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group recommends that Council:
1. SUPPORTS the acquisition of a purpose built caravan for the City’s Driver/Reviver Program;
2. SEEKS funding for the project through a grant from WALGA/RoadWise, Lotterywest or the Office of Road Safety;
3. WRITES to Zurich Insurance seeking approval to become a Sponsor of the Driver/Reviver Program;
4. THAT the current Driver/Reviver Caravan be offered for purchase to other RoadWise Committees and that the proceeds of such as sale be used to fund some of the project cost SUBJECT to successful grant application”.
Detail
In consideration of the resolution of the meeting, The following Council policies and section of the Local Government Act are relevant:
1. The City’s Purchasing Policy:
“For the procurement of goods or services where the value exceeds $20,000, but less than $40,000 it is required to obtain at least three written quotes (commonly a sufficient number of quotes would be sought according to the type and nature of purchase)”.
2. Local Government Act 1995 – Disposing of property:
“(2) A local Government can only dispose of property to –
(a) the highest bidder at public action; or
(b) the person who at public tender called by the local government makes which is, in the opinion of the local government, the most acceptable tender, whether or not it is the highest tender”
(3) A local government can dispose of property other than under subsection (2) if, before agreeing to dispose of the property.
(a) it gives Statewide public notice of the proposed disposition”.
3. Light Vehicle Fleet Policy
“Disposal Method
Light vehicles should be disposed of via auction at a public auction house or trade in (like brand for like brand) where this is expected to give higher return. Vehicles may also be sold by the tender process in order to gauge resale values by this method”.
4. Grants and Sponsorship Policy:
“4.1.7 Agreements for sponsorship accepted and undertaken by the City shall be confirmed in writing and relate to the specific event, program or activity. They may not involve future consideration of influence the day-today business of the City and/or Council.
The City must dutifully undertake and abide by conditions of sponsorship agreements entered into. Only the CEO may enter into a sponsorship agreement.
The duration of sponsorship agreements is fixed and will not normally exceed 12 months”.
Comment
Given the policy implications relating to the acquisition of a new caravan, Administration supports the following actions by the RoadWise Committee:
· Obtains three written quotes from suppliers;
· Submits an application for community grant funding through WALGA/RoadWise, Lotterywest and any other similar body;
· Approaches prospective sponsors
· Prepares a briefing note to the CEO for sponsorship approval;
· Approaches Fleet Assets regarding the Disposal of the current caravan.
Statutory Compliance
The Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group is established under the Local Government Act 1995, Part 5-Administration, Section 5.9c.
The City of Wanneroo Purchasing, Fleet and Grants and Sponsorship Policies will apply when purchasing the Caravan and disposing of the current vehicle.
Section 3.58 of The Local Government Act 1995 - Disposing of Property
Section 14 of the Local Government Function and General Regulations (1996) Section 11A – Purchasing Policies
Strategic Implications
This report is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 objectives and outcomes:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Purchasing Policy
Grants and Sponsorship Policy
Light Vehicle Fleet Policy
Financial Implications
Currently there is no funding available in the 2009/2010 City budget to cover the cost of this Project, which could equate to approximately $45,000. Funding will need to be sought through a combination of grant funding from WALGA/RoadWise and Lotterywest and sponsorship.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the acquisition of a purpose built caravan for the City’s Driver/Reviver Program, subject to the RoadWise Committee sourcing sufficient funding through a combination of external grant funding and sponsorship; and
2. NOTES that a further report will be presented on the outcome of funding initiatives by the RoadWise Committee.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R04/0004V01
File Name: CA Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Safey Improvements Feasibility Study.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Phil Calley
Meeting Date: 17 November 2009
Attachments: 3
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the outcomes of the Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Safety Improvements Feasibility Study and community responses to the pedestrian safety improvement options in Joondalup Drive between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road.
Background
On 16 December 2008 Council considered a report on improvements to pedestrian crossing facilities in Joondalup Drive, Banksia Grove (IN04-12/08 refers). Since that time a Better Regions funding agreement has been established which provides for the channelisation, median and verge treatments and landscaping which will help drivers to recognise that they are driving in an urbanised area and accordingly drop their speed to within the speed limit.
In addition to this initiative, Administration engaged consultants, Robert Willis and Terry Blanchard to conduct a feasibility study of Joondalup Drive pedestrian safety improvements between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road in early July 2009. A key consideration was the requirement for the consultants to address the local Community’s Terms of Reference. This feasibility Study was therefore conducted under the careful guidance of a Steering Group consisting of representatives from the Banksia Grove Residents Association, Banksia Grove Development Nominees and City Administration.
The feasibility study was subsequently undertaken to ensure that the local Community Terms of Reference and the final report explicitly addressed each of the concerns raised, a requirement that has been met by the Study report. A copy of the Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Facilities – Feasibility Study, November 2009 has been placed in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Detail
Joondalup Drive is a single carriageway between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road with a posted speed limit of 70km/hr but with an 85%ile actual speed of motorists being approximately 80 km/hr. The streetscape presently does not indicate to motorists that they are driving within a built up urbanised area. While the Better Regions project will help address this situation it remains a concern that specific safe pedestrian crossing locations remain unidentified.
Among other proposals to address pedestrian safety, the most expensive option was to separate pedestrians from the roadway entirely by installing either a footbridge or underpass. The importance of this issue amongst other concerns was specified very clearly in the Community Terms of Reference. The consultants were therefore required to undertake a community survey to explore more thoroughly what the community concerns are so that the consultancy final recommendations are founded on findings that fully address the community’s main concerns.
Two surveys and three community forums were undertaken. The second forum was necessary due to the low numbers of respondents that was partly caused by many residents not receiving the initial mail out. The second community forum was well attended and helped increase the numbers of respondents to the questionnaires. A copy of the questionnaire is attached. Refer Attachment 1.
The survey questionnaire distribution to all homes in Banksia Grove generated the return of approximately 14% of written surveys which is considered a good result as Local Government surveys generally receive only a 10% to 12% return.
The returns showed that there are residents crossing Joondalup Drive throughout the total length from Tumbleweed Drive to Viridian Drive. The area between Viridian Drive and Old Yanchep Road does not attract pedestrians and this is probably because there is no existing housing north of Joondalup Drive in that area.
The survey also asked residents to state why they crossed Joondalup Drive and out of the six categories, the physical activity and family and friends categories were responsible for 50% of those reasons (25% each). The outcome of the survey results generated some interesting themes of community thought on the safe pedestrian crossing issue and a summary of these responses was presented at the third community forum. Refer Attachment 2.
A number of key recommendations were generated from the feasibility study and these were as follows:
1. Based on other solutions being more socially acceptable, feedback from the public survey and the Joondalup Drive crossing requirements being over a wide area between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road, an overpass or underpass should not be constructed at any particular location within Joondalup Drive for the Banksia Grove community.
2. That future traffic signals with pedestrian phases are provided in Joondalup Drive at Tumbleweed Drive to assist pedestrians, cyclists and disadvantaged persons to cross Joondalup Drive when the commercial centre and community facilities are constructed on the corner of Tumbleweed Drive and Joondalup Drive.
3. That traffic signals with pedestrian phases be provided at Mistletoe Link to assist pedestrians, cyclists and disadvantaged persons to cross Joondalup Drive.
4. That the existing school crossing in Joondalup Drive between Tumbleweed Drive and Parakeelya Road be reinforced with flashing warning lights.
5. That the installation of a roundabout with vehicle deflections at the Viridian Link/Joondalup Drive intersection be provided within the next 12 months.
6. That the speed limit in Joondalup Drive between Old Yanchep Road and Wanneroo Road be reduced from 70kph to 60kph following installation of road treatments and landscaping to urbanise the section of Joondalup Drive between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road.
7. That Main Roads Western Australia be requested to reduce the Neaves Road speed limit from 90 km/hr to 80 km/hr, 500 metres from the Old Yanchep Road/Neaves Road intersection.
8. That as part of the current project the carriageways of Joondalup Drive has kerbing both sides to narrow the speed environment through the section of Joondalup Drive between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road.
9. That the proposed roundabout in Joondalup Drive, Neaves Road and Old Yanchep Road or realignment of Flynn Drive into Neaves Road with Joondalup entry statement (public art etc) be given priority as part of the future planning and works for the Banksia Grove area with the consideration that works are to include rumble strips and pre-deflection treatments for traffic approaching the roundabout from Neaves Road. Also a Banksia Grove entry statement community art feature with appropriate advisory signage and street lighting to identify to motorists that they are entering an urban environment is strongly recommended.
10. That future planning and construction gives priority to connecting Neaves Road to Flynn Drive and Wanneroo Road, then subsequently to the extension of the Mitchell Freeway. This will also provide access to the Neerabup Industrial Estate.
11. That funding for the traffic signals with pedestrian phases be actively pursued by the City of Wanneroo considering funding scenarios from the Federal, State and developer sources.
12. That further traffic modelling be carried out to assess future traffic volumes based on including the traffic management devices being suggested in this feasibility study.
13. That a meeting be held with Senior Police Officers from the District to consider the comments made in the community survey relating to hoons, unlicensed and speeding vehicles.
The timetable for implementation of the recommendations for the treatments required for pedestrian safety in Joondalup Drive can be categorised into three sections: short term, medium term and long term.
Short term is considered within the next two years, medium term within three to five years and long term is set at around ten years.
· The short term initiatives that can be put into place quickly are as follows:
· Flashing lights for the guarded school crossing;
· The roundabout at Viridian Drive/Joondalup Drive intersection;
· Traffic signals with pedestrian phases at the Mistletoe Drive/Joondalup Drive intersection;
· Reduction in speed limit from 70 km/hr to 60 km/hr on Joondalup Drive from Wanneroo Road to Old Yanchep Road;
· Reduction in speed limit on Neaves Road from 90 km/hr to 80 km/hr from a point approximately half a kilometre from the Old Yanchep Road intersection;
· Some form of urban entry statement at Old Yanchep Road/Neaves Road intersection;
· Kerbing of both sides of the carriageways in Joondalup Drive between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road;
Medium Term Initiatives
These initiatives are considered by the consultants to be required but will not occur for at least three years:
· Traffic signals with pedestrian phases at Tumbleweed Drive/Joondalup Drive;
· Roundabout or major entry statement at the Old Yanchep Road/Joondalup Drive/Neaves Road intersection.
The long term initiative is to connect Neaves Road directly to Flynn Drive which is part of a major planning review over the next couple of years. The implementation of such planning issues may take up to ten years to put into place.
Comment
The consultants have undertaken a significant amount of consultation in addition to the administration of the questionnaire survey of local residents. School Principals have been consulted and Main Roads WA representatives have been involved in the feasibility study process. Administration is fully satisfied that the extent of consultation undertaken is adequate.
A key outcome from the consultant’s study is the recommendation for the establishment of a roundabout at the Viridian Drive intersection which can be incorporated into the Better Regions Pedestrian Safety Improvement works project that is fully funded and currently in its design phase. The roundabout will be a highly effective physical treatment that will slow traffic, particularly in the westbound direction. Administration has applied to the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to amend the scope of works to incorporate this roundabout.
The possibility of traffic signals with a pedestrian phase at Mistletoe Drive is considered a very high priority and deserving of lobbying the Member for Wanneroo for the provision of State funding for this signalisation treatment in 2010.
One finding of concern is that the accident experienced by the young girl who has long term injury effects has been categorised merely as a casualty and not a major casualty in the Main Roads WA accident statistics. However the accident statistics are useful in clearly indicating that the Tumbleweed Drive intersection is the most prone area for accidents and the requirement for traffic signalisation of this intersection is considered most urgent.
Attachment 3 shows the percentage of total pedestrian crossings that occur at the various locations along Joondalup Drive. The table below shows details determined from the community survey depicting the individual purpose of the Joondalup Drive pedestrian crossings currently being undertaken by the community.
Percentages of Individual Purposes |
||
Purpose |
No. |
% |
School |
10 |
10.64% |
Shop/deli |
18 |
19.15% |
Community Centre |
8 |
8.51% |
Public Open Space |
10 |
10.64% |
Physical Activity |
24 |
25.53% |
Family/Friends |
24 |
25.53% |
Total |
94 |
100% |
The safety of children has been a key focus of the feasibility study. Consequently the consultants analysed information gathered from a variety of sources to determine current and future child pedestrian movement trends summarised as follows.
Predicted Children Travelling South |
||
|
2014 |
2019 |
Population |
6,010 |
8,599 |
Population South |
2,051 |
2,051 |
Population predicted North |
3,959 |
6,548 |
Percentage Children |
2.55 |
2.55 |
Number children Crossing from North |
101 |
167 |
Number Children Crossing Joondalup Drive from the North |
||
Item |
2008 |
2014 |
Number children North of Joondalup Drive |
50 |
101 |
Percentage Crossing Joondalup Drive at Grade |
20 |
20 |
Number Children Crossing at Grade |
10 |
20 |
Grade separation was a primary consideration in the feasibility study since an overpass or underpass provides a 100% guaranteed safe crossing of Joondalup Drive for those that choose to use such a facility. However an overpass would cost in the order of $3,550,000 and introduces a risk of projectiles being thrown down on motorists and privacy issues. The cost of an underpass bridge structure could be in the vicinity of $10M.
Administration accepts that grade separated crossings are no longer supported by major government agencies including Main Roads WA, who only support grade separation crossings associated with freeways and controlled access highways.
The reduction of the Joondalup Drive speed limit from 70km/hr to 60km/hr between Wanneroo Road and Old Yanchep Road is strongly supported, however is subject to implementation of all the treatments and the ulimate approval of Main Roads WA.
Administration also appreciates the efforts of the Banksia Grove Resident’s Association representatives, Geoff Westlake and Christine Baxter and the Banksia Grove Development Nominees representatives, Jeremy Cordina and Brad Goodlett, in their participation in the Steering group which was very positive and helpful in achieving a suitable outcome from the feasibility study.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Joondalup Drive Feasibility Study is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan (2006-2021) outcomes and objectives.
“Social
2.4 Improve Community Safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The proposed funding of the recommendations generated by the feasibility Study are summarised below:
Short Term
The funding arrangement for the short term initiatives, other than the traffic signals at Mistletoe Drive, can be accommodated from the $1.8M allocated to Project No 1936 – Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Safety Improvement Works. This is subject to approval from the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to vary the scope of works to include the roundabout at Viridian Drive. The funding for the signals may need to come from the City of Wanneroo, unless the lobbying of State or Federal Governments can provide funding in the order of $170,000.
Medium Term
The traffic signals at Tumbleweed Drive will be provided by the developer over the next three years as part of the construction of the shopping centre.
The funding of the roundabout at Old Yanchep Road will need to come from Council funds as most of the Black Spot grants depend on accidents etc and this intersection does not have the number of accidents to warrant grant funds.
Long Term
The connection of Neaves Road directly into Flynn Drive and extending Flynn Drive to Wanneroo Road and beyond to the Mitchell Freeway will be decided at that time.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Safety Feasibility Study Report – November 2009 by consultants Robert Willis and Terry Blanchard;
2. SUPPORTS the Study Report recommendation that an overpass or underpass not be constructed at any point between Tumbleweed Drive and Old Yanchep Road Banksia Grove;
3. NOTES the letter of support for the recommendations from the Banksia Grove Residents Association.
4. ENDORSES the submission by Administration to the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to vary the Better Regions Pedestrian Safety Improvement Works Project, to incorporate a roundabout at the Joondalup Drive/Viridian Drive intersection, so that this can be included in the 2010 works.
5. SUPPORTS the installation of traffic signals with pedestrian phases at the Mistletoe Drive/Joondalup Drive intersection
6. REQUESTS the Member for Wanneroo to assist with State Government funding of $170,000 for the provision of traffic signals with pedestrian phases at the Mistletoe Drive/Joondalup Drive intersection.
7. SUPPORTS the installation of traffic signals with pedestrian phases at the Mistletoe Drive/Joondalup Drive intersection as part of the 2010/2011 Traffic Treatments Budget;
8. SUPPORTS the installation of an urban entry statement at Old Yanchep Road/Neaves Road intersection being included in the 2010/2011 Capital Works budget;
9. SUPPORTS a roundabout or major entry statement at the Old Yanchep road/Joondalup Drive/Neaves Road intersection in the long term;
10. SUPPORTS a request to Main Roads WA to reduce the speed limit from 70 km/hr to 60 km/hr on Joondalup Drive from Wanneroo Road to Old Yanchep Road on completion of the works proposed as part of the Better Regions Pedestrian Safety Improvement Works Project;
11. SUPPORTS the proposal for Administration to meet with the WA Police District Superintendent to highlight the need to control traffic speeds and hoon behaviour along Joondalup Drive;
12. SUPPORTS the reduction in speed limit on Neaves Road from 90km/hr to 80km/hr from a point approximately 500 metres from the Old Yanchep Road intersection;
13. ACKNOWLEDGES the input from Banksia Grove Residents Association in the Steering Group activities.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R03/0001V01; V20/0005V01; R29/0001V01; R31/0002V01
File Name: CA Pinjar Road Realignment Dual Carriageway Staging and Funding Project.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Civil Designer
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a staging and funding program for the construction of the Pinjar Road Realignment/Dual Carriageway Project from Wanneroo Road to Galileo Avenue, Ashby/Mariginiup/Sinagra/Tapping.
Background
Council at its meeting on 27 April 2004 endorsed the adoption of the City of Wanneroo T1811 engineering drawing series depicting the preliminary road design and land requirement plans for the regional roads associated with the East Wanneroo Scheme (EWS). These plans highlight the requirements for realignment and upgrade of Pinjar Road in support of the extensive residential development that is occurring in Cells 1 and 2 of the EWS. Ultimately, Pinjar Road will connect with Flynn Drive to the north, providing a direct link to the Neerabup Industrial Area from the area to the east of Lake Joondalup, and provision of an upgraded connection to Wanneroo Road, Joondalup Drive (through to the Mitchell Freeway and Neaves Road) and Caporn Street that provides a link to the greater East Wanneroo area.
Design and documentation of the Pinjar Road Realignment/Dual Carriageway Project has been progressed in-house and is currently at 85% complete stage, with commencement of construction now able to be scheduled with confidence during the first quarter of 2010. It is noted that environmental along with a number of reasonably intricate service relocation issues are currently being finalised, with these matters having brought about the delay in progressing this project and as a consequence, the ability to commence works on site.
This report addresses both staging and funding arrangements that are required to accommodate the works. In particular, the impact of funding given the majority of the cost to design/construct the project is to be sourced from the EWS Cell 1 and 2 accounts, with the balance of funding to be sourced from a combination of developer contributions arising from contributions made as part of subdivisional development works to the EWS Cell 1 and 2 accounts, from municipal and loan funds, and blackspot grants.
Refer Attachment 1 for a location plan of the works.
Detail
Progress and Staging
The ultimate design for Pinjar Road from Wanneroo Road to Galileo Avenue proposes a four-lane dual carriageway within a minimum 40m wide road reserve.
As part of the works, Pinjar Road will be relocated to a new alignment between Wanneroo Road and Carosa Road/Messina Drive. The new intersection at Wanneroo Road will be traffic signal controlled, with its location sited approximately 300m north of its current location. On connecting to Carosa Road/Messina Drive, Pinjar Road will then continue north on its existing alignment to Galileo Avenue.
The works will be split into two stages, with the first stage being the subject of this report. It is noted that the second and final stage of works from Edward Street northwards to Galileo Avenue (ie: the dual carriageway section inclusive of the service road on the eastern side of Pinjar Road between Edward and Tapping Streets) is scheduled for future construction, with timing primarily dependent on road use, that is; traffic volumes.
The first stage works include:
· The southbound carriageway on Wanneroo Road will be reconstructed where the new Pinjar Road alignment intersects Wanneroo Road in order to give clearance over a high-pressure gas main at this location.
· Traffic signals will be installed at the “new” Wanneroo Road/Pinjar Road intersections.
· Single carriageway to be constructed on the north/western side of Pinjar Road road reserve for the full length of the project, with a second carriageway constructed between Wanneroo Road and Bonannella Entrance.
· The existing Pinjar Road alignment north of Bonannella Entrance will be reconstructed to form the second carriageway through to Caporn Street/Hollosy Way.
· Caporn Street through to east of San Teodoro Avenue will be realigned to allow appropriately designed access to/from Pinjar Road, with this section constructed as a dual carriageway with transition back to the existing Caporn Street single carriageway.
· A new two lane carriageway for traffic heading north will be constructed on the western side of the Pinjar Road road reserve from Caporn Street/Hollosy Way to link via a dual to single carriageway transition located just to the south of Galileo Avenue, with the existing Pinjar Road carriageway between Edward Street and Galileo Avenue utilised as a temporary dual for traffic heading south
· Two new dual lane roundabouts to be constructed where Pinjar Road intersects with Carosa Road/Messina Drive and Caporn Street/Hollosy Way.
· An underpass is proposed just south of Bonannella Entrance linking the suburbs of Sinagra and Ashby.
· Intersection alterations will take place at the existing Wanneroo Road/Pinjar Road intersection, with this intersection becoming left in and left out only to “old” Pinjar Road and full traffic turning movements for Neville Drive will remain (pending Main Road WA approval).
· The old Pinjar Road alignment in the vicinity of Wanneroo Road will be retained and routed into Capri Leone Way just south of Carosa Road and this downgraded to a residential road.
Works are scheduled to commence during the first half of 2010 and will be undertaken by the City’s Construction personnel.
Refer Attachment 2 for an engineering plan identifying the extent of the works.
Land Acquisition
Land at the corner of the future connection of Pinjar Road with Messina Drive is currently under compulsory resumption, with an understanding at the time this report was prepared that there is strong likelihood that settlement will be forthcoming shortly. Until this matter is resolved, physical works on site associated with connection of Messina Drive to the roundabout with Carosa Road will need to be put on hold. Should this land matter not be resolved by the time this intersection is open to traffic then interconnectivity within the residential road network will be compromised for the residents living in this area.
The property inclusive of an existing house located adjacent to the northern corner of Carosa Road and Pinjar Road is owned by the City (a purchase made as part of the EWS), with the house to be demolished as part of preparatory works being undertaken in advance of construction works commencing. Once the house is demolished and the property cleared of all rubble clearance will then be given to proceed with boundary adjustments associated with this property.
Environmental Assessment
Clearing Permit CPS 2163/1 was issued by the Department of Environment and Conservation on 13 December 2008 (Expires 13 December 2013). All conditions including land offsets have been agreed and a project management plan is currently being developed to cover off all conditions of approval.
Aboriginal Heritage
Investigation for Aboriginal heritage sites was conducted by a consultant expert in this area, with submission of a report presented to the City entitled “Aboriginal Heritage – Pinjar Road Works, City of Wanneroo (July 2008)”. This report indicates the absence of any sites or areas of significance. Furthermore, the City also independently requested the Department of Indigenous Affairs in September 2009 in follow up to the report to also check their registers for any sites of interest and none were found.
Noise Assessment Survey
A noise assessment survey of the ultimate alignment was carried out to ascertain whether noise attenuation methods are required in the future, with advice received that future traffic volumes on Pinjar Road are predicted to be relatively high at 16,000 vehicles per day and as such, the noise levels generated will also be relatively high. However, in addressing the State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Consideration in Land Use Planning developed by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), which sets out recommended outdoor noise exposure criteria, it is noted that Pinjar Road does not qualify as a major road under the definition of the Policy.
In this instance the City has been encouraged to consider the potential impact of noise and methods for this to be minimised, particularly south of Bonannella Entrance where the project will in effect be a new road (ie: the realigned portion of Pinjar Road). In review of the design it is noted that the following considerations are being addressed:
· Use of open graded asphalt - this has a potential noise benefit of, on average, 2.5dB over dense graded asphalt, however will increase maintenance costs;
· Decrease of the posted speed to 60km/hr - a decrease of 10km/hr will result in around a 1dB decrease in average noise level, with consideration given to any decrease in speed being subject to Main Roads WA approval, and;
· Reducing the road elevation - lowering the road elevation by one metre will reduce noise levels by 0.5 to 0.9dB, depending on the surrounding topography.
Service Relocations
All major service conflicts have been identified and the relative service authorities have been consulted and quotations sought. A summary of the current status in this regard follows:
· Alinta Gas have approved the design at Wanneroo Road and provided estimates for the changes requested at Carosa Road and Hollosy Way;
· Western Power have supplied construction quotes for the majority of service conflicts currently identified, with final plans currently being prepared. The streetlighting design has been completed and sent to Western Power for quotation;
· Telstra have completed designs and provided quotations for major service adjustments, and;
· The Water Corporation have been approached in relation to conflict with water and sewerage services over the length of the project including those in the immediate vicinity of the proposed underpass.
On completion of the drainage design and construction drawings some further minor service adjustments may be necessary.
Main Roads WA Approvals
Main Roads WA are currently attending to minor adjustments associated with the traffic signal design at Wanneroo Road.
Construction approval for the final design drawings associated with the changes proposed to Wanneroo Road in order to accommodate the need to ensure appropriate cover is available over the high pressure gas main located in the eastern verge of Wanneroo Road is still to be received by the City.
The City is still to progress the matter of speed reduction from 70Km/hr to 60km/hr for the realigned portion of Pinjar Road with Main Roads WA – this request will also impact on Wanneroo Road as it is currently posted at 70km/hr.
Road Safety Audit
On completion of the design a Road Safety Audit (Design) will be conducted, with recommendations arising from this process to be addressed prior to seeking construction approval endorsement for the drawings.
Funding
The Pinjar Road project is identified in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget as being predominantly funded from the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts for an allocated amount of $3,000,000. Further amounts allocated are $346,667 from municipal funds, $850,000 from loan borrowings and $133,333 sourced through State BlackSpot grant funding. In total, budgeted funding of $4,330,000 is available in the 2009/2010 financial year (PR-1416, PR-1639 & PR-1937,).
Further funding listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program for 2010/2011 is noted as being sourced from the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts and municipal funds and totals $3,550,000.
Additional funds have been identified from a search of records where an adjoining developer has contributed to other works in the immediate area as part of their subdivision approval but such works were outside that covered by the EWS. In this instance, a developer will have provided a cash contribution in lieu of works were it has physically been unable to be completed during the creation of the subdivision. An amount of $374,646 has been identified from this source for works relating to the Pinjar Road project. This sum has not been identified in either the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget or listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program.
It has also been determined through review of the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts that a further sum of $1,294,980 is available for road related construction activity in full settlement of cell contributions linked to the realignment/upgrade of Pinjar Road and Caporn Street. This additional EWS funding has not been identified in either the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget or listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program.
In total, funding of $9,549,626 is available for the Pinjar Road project albeit not fully allocated/listed in either the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget or listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program. Furthermore, a portion of the budgeted funds allocated for expenditure during 2009/2010 will need to be carried forward to the 2010/2011 financial year given the delay in progressing finalisation of design and as a consequence, commencement of work on site by the City’s Construction personnel.
It is advised that EWS Cells 1 and 2 funding is regulated under the District Planning Scheme No. 2 Schedule 9 and only applies to specific construction portions of the first carriageway, that being: kerbing, drainage, paving and street lighting limited to standard intersection layouts with sections in between having to be funded from other sources. However, the Cell works include all clearing, earthworks and a single carriageway pavement. It is also noted that EWS Cells 1 and 2 fully funds the construction of the underpass.
Consultation
EWS Cells 1 and 2 are managed for the City by the Development Contributions Manager with whom funding availability and associated arrangements have been discussed and agreed.
A Public Information Session was held on 30 November 2009 in the “Banksia Room” at the City of Wanneroo Civic Centre. A total of 36 interested local residents/members of the public attended. The meeting focussed on presentation of the background associated with subdivisional land development/infrastructure planning in support of the road alignment, the East Wanneroo Scheme and how it operates (high-level overview), developer contribution in relation to funding for future road construction/public open space purchase followed by a technical overview of the Pinjar Road Realignment/Upgrade project itself.
In addressing the section of Pinjar Road to be upgraded between Caporn Street and Galileo Avenue Administration, since forwarding advice to adjoining property owners/occupiers in lead up to the Public Information Session, had undertaken a preliminary safety focused review of the project. This review identified that the proposed use of the existing Pinjar Road carriageway as a default dual carriageway heading south in lieu of deferring the future construction of the ultimate dual carriageway along this section of Pinjar Road (ie: the future eastern carriageway) would cause possible safety concerns in relation to property access and possibly.
As a consequence, a revised proposal was promoted at the Public Information Session whereby the new Pinjar Road western carriageway to be constructed will provide for a single lane in each direction, replacing the existing Pinjar Road carriageway and moves the proposed transition from dual carriageway to single carriageway from just south of Galileo Avenue to immediately north of Edward Street.
In support of change in carriageway design, the existing Pinjar Road carriageway will be downgraded to a service road and will reflect the future intent of this section of road as promoted in the ultimate design. Two controlled access/egress points onto/from Pinjar Road will be provided to allow for safe property access/egress. Furthermore, this would also provide an additional barrier to some minor rat-running that has been occurring through Tapping Street and Wells Street in order to avoid the traffic delays being experienced during peak times at the existing Pinjar Road/Caporn Street intersection (ie: this intersection is to be upgraded to a dual roundabout configuration as part of the Pinjar Road Realignment/Upgrade project).
Refer Attachment 3 for a revised engineering plan identifying the proposed changes to the carriageway design between Caporn Street and Galileo Avenue.
Following the presentations and explanation of the change in carriageway design between Caporn Street and Galileo Avenue a Question and Answer session followed, with one-on-one/small group discussion over the plans that were as presented thereafter.
Comment
The Ultimate Design for the realignment/upgrade of Pinjar Road along with the Caporn Street connection has been completed, with detailed design for the first stage of works at 85% complete.
Funding is summarised as follows:
Funding Source |
Existing |
EWS Cells 1 and 2 – Civil Works including Road Construction, Dual Use Path, Drainage and Intersection Streetlighting |
$6,958,071 |
EWS Cells 1 and 2 – Underpass |
$406,909 |
Municipal Funds |
$826,667 |
Loan Borrowings |
$850,000 |
State Blackspot |
$133,333 |
Developer Contributions under WAPC |
$374,646 |
TOTAL |
$9,549,626 |
It is advised that a total of $7,880,000 in funding has been identified in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget and the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program, with a further total of $1,669,626 in funding still to be listed for budget consideration as part of the budget process linked to the development of the 2010/2011 Capital Works Budget. This additional funding arises from a review undertaken of the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts (ie: $1,294,980) and Developer Contributions (ie: $374,646).
An in-house overarching cost estimate has been prepared for the proposed first stage works and currently indicates a savings in funding for the first stage works. However, there is still approximately 25% of the cost estimate noted at order of cost stage, with three major items making up the majority of this component of cost currently under review, they being:
· Streetlighting for which final advice as to actual cost from Western Power to supply and install is still to be received;
· Landscape/conservation requirements for which design and associated documentation has recently commenced, with this item primarily reflecting the financial impact of environmental offset requirements arising from the approved clearing permit for the Pinjar Road project, and;
· The Pinjar Road underpass for which the design has been completed but the cost estimate is still to be finalised.
In addressing the underpass, it is firstly noted that this is a “boxed” culvert design due to site constrictions primarily related to the constraints imposed by the existing services located in the immediate area of the underpass. Secondly, that this is a design that was avoided for provision of underpasses in both the Hartman Drive and Mirrabooka Avenue projects due to the need to design in the concepts promoted as part of crime prevention through environmental design.
The Pinjar Road underpass will also need to be tendered as the City’s Construction personnel are not experienced or have the plant and equipment to undertake this work. Furthermore, construction of the underpass will also need to be undertaken under traffic for the section to be installed under the existing Pinjar Road carriageway.
At the Public Information Session held on 30 November 2009 the main issues arising/discussed are summarised as follows:
· Perceived lack of information relating to planning in support of the proposed realignment of Pinjar Road and associated new intersection with Wanneroo Road.
· Loss of the ‘U’-turn facility as a consequence of the proposed Wanneroo Road/Pinjar Road traffic signalised intersection in the same location and what do residents do to access/egress their properties dependent on whether they a travelling from the north or south along Wanneroo Road.
· Safety and noise concerns arising from both vehicular traffic and pedestrians for properties along Tintern Road that have the rear boundaries bounding the Pinjar Road road reserve
· Land acquisition at Messina Drive at the intersection with Pinjar Road and the timely provision of access into the residential area serviced by Messina Drive.
· Pros and cons relating to the underpass immediately to the south of Bonannella Entrance.
· Noise issues for properties along Benjamin Crescent where houses will directly overlook the new Pinjar Road western carriageway (ie: Benjamin Crescent is a road located immediately adjacent to the Pinjar Road road reserve).
· Illegal traffic access across the Benjamin Crescent/Pinjar Road verge.
· Access/egress for properties on the eastern side of Pinjar Road between Caporn Street and Galileo Avenue – addressed as part of the modified carriageway design and inclusion of a service road along this section of Pinjar Road.
· Overhead power lines along existing Pinjar Road between Caporn and Galileo Avenue.
· Heavy haulage route, policing, etc.
· Construction process and associated timeframe.
· Timeframe associated with completion of the ultimate design for Pinjar Road north of Caporn Street.
A matter not directly related to Pinjar Road Realignment /Upgrade project but worthy of mention and needing to be resolved relates to flooding of Harris Road (an unformed road located between Edward and Tapping Streets). This matter will need to be investigated by Administration as a separate issue and a solution developed for subsequent consideration as part of the City’s infrastructure forward planning process.
Of the issues raised, the matters concerning the loss of the U-turn facility on Wanneroo Road and the Tintern Road and Benjamin Crescent safety and noise concerns are to be further investigated, and the impact (if any) on the design as it currently stands reviewed before the design is finalised. Furthermore, the change to the carriageway design and inclusion of a service road between Caporn Street and Galileo Avenue was supported. Also, there was general consensus in support of removal of the underpass from the design as presented in favour of an at-grade crossing, with residents past experiences in relation to antisocial issues associated with underpasses primarily driving this decision. Residents also acknowledged the need for pedestrian pathway network in the general area along with a need to provide a controlled crossing of Pinjar Road given the dual carriageway nature of the road as proposed. The deletion of the underpass in favour of an at-grade crossing was further substantiated on the basis that an at-grade crossing provides a level of passive surveillance that an underpass is not able to provide at this location.
Given the consensus in support of removal of the underpass from the design as presented, with preference for an at-grade crossing, Administration is of the opinion that to go to tender for the construction of the underpass would not be appropriate in this instance and therefore seeks Council’s concurrence accordingly. If Council supports a decision to delete the underpass from the works then this is allowable under the provisions of District Planning Scheme No2, Part 10 – East Wanneroo Planning and Developer Contributions Arrangements – Cell 1 – 8. It is noted that if deletion of the underpass is supported then this would also allow the left-in/left-out intersection at Bonannella Entrance as currently promoted, to be converted to a full intersection (ie: allowing traffic turning manoeuvres from all directions) thereby improving connectivity within the adjacent residential area serviced by this road. Inclusion of a suitable at-grade crossing alternative would also be provided as part of the intersection design.
The remaining issues raised at the Public Information Session are not considered to have an impact on the design and will be followed up by Administration in parallel to the design related issues.
A wider discussion in relation to the greater road network was also entered into, in particular, how Wanneroo Road, Joondalup Drive, and Flynn Drive to the north and Caporn Street, Franklin Road, Lenore Road and the connection with Ocean Reef Road to the east/south will interlink/operate.
Statutory Compliance
The funding contribution that relates to the EWS Cells 1 and 2 is authorised by Part 10 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 and contributions in respect to intersections and outstanding works by developers are authorised by the subdivision approvals issued by the WAPC.
Strategic Implications
The Pinjar Road Realignment/Dual Carriageway Project is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives
“Social
2.5 Improve transport options and connections
Economic
3.2 Improve regional infrastructure”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Funding of $4,330,000 has been approved in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget for the design and construction of the Pinjar Road Realignment/Upgrade Project. Further funding totalling $5,219,626 has been identified as being required in the 2010/2011 financial year in order to complete the works associated with the project and as a consequence, results in an overall project budget of $9,549,626.
It is noted that only $3,550,000 in funding has been listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program for 2010/2011 ($2,600,000 for Pinjar Road, $750,000 for Caporn Street and a further sum of $200,000 for Pinjar Road Streetlighting)). The 10-year Program will need to be updated to allow for the sum of $374,646 provided through Developer Contributions and the remaining funding of $1,294,980 available for construction of both Pinjar Road and Caporn Street from the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts. Funding availability and associated arrangements in regard to the EWS funding has been agreed with the City’s Development Contributions Manager.
The estimated cost of the proposed works is currently indicating a saving in funding. However, approximately 25% of the cost estimate is still at order of cost stage and following receipt of quotation/completion of design associated with the outstanding items making up the order of cost, amendment of the current projected savings will most likely occur.
As there are a number of funding sources supporting the Pinjar Road project it will be imperative to accurately account for all expenditure incurred to ensure that financial accountability is secured. Any savings in project cost following completion of the works would need to be returned to the EWS Cells 1 and 2 accounts.
Funding for any future works relating to the balance of the ultimate second carriageway when required will need to be sourced from a mixture of Municipal/Loan/Grant funding as appropriate as the EWS will have advanced all of its liability in relation to the construction of the realignment and upgrade of Pinjar Road and Caporn Street.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RECEIVES this report on the progress and funding arrangements for the Pinjar Road Realignment/Upgrade project;
2. NOTES that the Public Information Session held on 30 November 2009 has resulted in a number of actions for further follow up by Administration before the design is able to be finalised, in particular matters relating to:
a) Loss of U-turn facility on Wanneroo Road in favour of the new Wanneroo Road/Pinjar Road intersection;
b) Tintern Road and Benjamin Crescent safety and noise concerns;
c) Preference for the deletion of the underpass on Pinjar Road immediately south of the Bonannella Entrance intersection from the design as presented in favour of an at-grade crossing and associated upgrade of the proposed left-in/left-out intersection at Bonannella Entrance to a full turn intersection, and;
d) Revised proposal promoted at the Public Information Session whereby the new Pinjar Road western carriageway is to be constructed to provide for a single lane in each direction in replacement of the existing Pinjar Road carriageway, moving the proposed transition from dual carriageway to single carriageway from just south of Galileo Avenue to immediately north of Edward Street, inclusive of the existing Pinjar Road carriageway to be downgraded to a service road, with two controlled access/egress points onto/from Pinjar Road to be provided to allow for safe property access/egress.
3. ENDORSES the deletion of the underpass proposed on Pinjar Road immediately south of the Bonannella Entrance intersection from the Pinjar Road Realignment/Upgrade project, with Administration to investigate future requirements and action accordingly, and;
4. ENDORSES the proposed modification to the Pinjar Road carriageway design between Caporn Street and Galileo as identified in Attachment 3 to this report, with City Administration to upgrade the design as currently reflected in Attachment 2.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R17/0022V02
File Name: A Mirrabooka Avenue Extension Staging and Funding Program.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Project Manager Civil Contracts
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a staging and funding program for the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension Project from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road, Darch/Landsdale.
Background
Council at its meeting on 27 April 2004 endorsed the adoption of the City of Wanneroo T1811 engineering drawing series depicting the preliminary road design and land requirement plans for the regional roads associated with the East Wanneroo Structure Plan (EWS). The extension of Mirrabooka Avenue is supported given the impending connection of Ocean Reef Road from Prestige Parade through to Alexander Drive. This will provide completed north-south (Mirrabooka Avenue) and east-west connectivity in the Darch/Landsdale area.
Council, at its meeting on 7 August 2007, accepted a submission from SKM Pty Ltd for the design and documentation for the extension of Mirrabooka Avenue from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road (IN06-08/07), however, this contract was terminated by the City during June 2009, with work on the design of this project having reached 75% completion. GHD Pty Ltd has now been engaged to review/complete the design, with design and associated documentation now significantly enough advanced to a stage where construction can be tentatively scheduled to commence during the first quarter of 2010.
This report addresses proposed staging and associated funding arrangements that are required to accommodate the first stage cost for the works.
Refer Attachment 1 for a plan identifying the location/extent of the works.
Detail
Progress and Staging
The ultimate design for the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension proposes a four-lane dual carriageway within a minimum 40m wide road reserve. The alignment abuts an existing roundabout at Hepburn Avenue, links with the existing Madeley Street alignment and then extends through to a location just short of the existing Madeley Street intersection with Gnangara Road. It includes a new roundabout where it crosses the Kingsway deviation and a pedestrian underpass located north of a new Landsdale Road intersection.
The works will be split into two stages, with the first stage being the subject of this report. Works include a single lane dualling from Hepburn Avenue to Landsdale Road, these lanes then combining to form a single carriageway to Gnangara Road constructed on the eastern side of the reserve and allows for future duplication as shown in Attachment 2.
It also includes provision of streetlighting, the construction of a full-length pedestrian underpass and staged intersection improvements.
It is proposed at this time to advertise tender of the works during the first quarter of 2010, with work commencing on site during the second quarter.
Land Acquisition
The land adjacent to the proposed Mirrabooka Avenue Extension has been substantially developed, with land developers ceding the land required for the works. No further land acquisition is required in order to progress the proposed works.
Environmental Assessment
Clearing Permit CPS 1871/1 was issued by the Department of Environment and Conservation effective from 18 November 2007 (Expires 18 November 2012), with the decision report indicating no further requirements.
Aboriginal Heritage
An investigation for Aboriginal heritage sites was conducted, with a report entitled; “Report on Archaeological Investigation for Aboriginal Sites Mirrabooka Avenue Dual Carriageway Extension Project, Landsdale (September 2007)” prepared by a consultant expert in this area. This report indicates an absence of any sites or areas of significance.
Noise Assessment Survey
A noise assessment of the ultimate alignment was carried out to ascertain whether noise attenuation methods were required for the future, with advice received that the extension of Mirrabooka Avenue may require some noise attenuation on exposed frontages as part of the ultimate dual carriageway construction. However, in addressing the State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Consideration in Land Use Planning developed by the Western Australian Planning Commission, which sets out recommended outdoor noise exposure criteria, it is noted that Mirrabooka Avenue does not qualify as a major road under the definitions identified in the Policy. As a consequence, every endeavour is being made during the design process to maximise noise attenuation as much as practically possible.
Service Relocations
All services are currently being fully investigated by the City’s design consultant, GHD Pty Ltd, and service authorities are being consulted in relation to proposed adjustments where necessary.
At this time it has been reported that there are no major service clashes identified, that relocations that have been identified are minor in nature and generally relate to services within existing roads that currently cross the proposed Mirrabooka Avenue road alignment.
Main Roads WA Approvals
No issues arising.
Road Safety Audit
A Road Safety Audit will be conducted on completion of the final design for the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension, with any recommendations arising to be addressed prior to seeking construction approval endorsement for the drawings.
Funding
The Mirrabooka Avenue project is identified in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget as being predominantly funded from the EWS Cells 5 and 6 accounts for an amount of $5,250,785 and includes a carry forward amount of $76,638 from the 2008/2009 financial year to complete the design. A further amount of $773,000 is listed from municipal funds. In total, budgeted funding of $6,023,785 is available in the 2009/2010 financial year (PR-1311).
Additional funds have also been identified from a search of records where an adjoining developer has contributed to other works in the immediate area as part of their subdivision approval but such works were outside that covered by the EWS. In this instance, a developer will have provided a cash contribution in lieu of works where it has physically been unable to be completed during the creation of the subdivision. An amount of $307,650 has been identified from this source for works relating to the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension. This sum has not been identified in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget or listed in the City’s 10-year Capital Works Program.
In total, funding of $6,331,435 is available for the Mirrabooka Avenue project. However, it is noted that the greater portion of this budget will need to be carried forward to the 2010/2011 financial year given the delay in progressing finalisation of design and as a consequence, commencement of work on site (ie: subject to tender award consideration by Council).
It is advised that EWS Cells 5 and 6 funding is regulated under the District Planning Scheme No. 2 Schedule 9 and only applies to specific construction portions of the first carriageway, that being: kerbing, drainage, paving and street lighting limited to standard intersection layouts with sections in between having to be funded from other sources. However, the Cell works include all clearing, earthworks and a single carriageway pavement. It is also noted that EWS Cells 5 and 6 fully funds the construction of the underpass.
Consultation
EWS Cells 5 and 6 are managed for the City by the Development Contributions Manager with whom funding availability and associated arrangements have been discussed and agreed.
A Public Information Session was held on 26 November 2009 in “The Boardroom” at the Kingsway Indoor Stadium. A total of 19 interested local residents/members of the public attended the meeting. The meeting focussed on presentation of the background associated with subdivisional land development/infrastructure planning in support of the road alignment, the East Wanneroo Scheme and how it operates (high-level overview), developer contribution in relation to funding for future road construction/public open space purchase followed by a technical overview of the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension project itself.
A Question and Answer session followed, with one-on-one/small group discussion over the plans that were presented thereafter.
Comment
The design for extension of Mirrabooka Avenue has been substantially revised from the original design to cater for service constraints. At this stage there are some minor modifications still required in order to complete the design before tender documentation can be actioned.
Funding is summarised as follows:
Funding Source |
Existing |
EWS Cells 5 and 6 – Civil Works including Road Construction, Dual Use Path, Drainage and Intersection Streetlighting |
$4,438,341 |
EWS Cells 5 and 6 – Underpass |
$812,444 |
Municipal Funds |
$773,000 |
Developer Contributions under WAPC |
$307,650 |
TOTAL |
$6,331,435 |
It is noted that only $6,023,785 is currently allocated in the City’s 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget, with the balance of funds totalling $307,650 sourced from Developer Contribution still to be transferred to the project.
Pre-tender estimates have been prepared for both the Ultimate Design and for the proposed Stage 1 works. A potential shortfall in funding is indicated when comparing the pre-tender estimated cost with the budget allocation for Stage 1 works.
In further review of the pre-tender estimate for the Mirrabooka Avenue project and when comparing pre-tender estimates with the contract award amounts for Ocean Reef Road Extension from Hartman Drive to Prestige Parade (ie: Contract awarded by Council in May 2008/IN01-05/08) and more recently, Hartman Drive Extension from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road (ie: Contract awarded by Council in September 2009/IN04-09/09), it is noted that construction costs as tendered are currently very competitive. Given this situation it is expected that tenders received for the Mirrabooka Avenue project will more than likely reflect a similar pattern.
In addressing the proposed Mirrabooka Avenue underpass it is suggested that it be tendered as an option that subject to cost review can be deleted from the main contract if necessary – in the same manner as the underpasses (2 off) that were proposed as part of the Hartman Drive project. This is allowable under the provisions of District Planning Scheme No2, Part 10 – East Wanneroo Planning and Developer Contributions Arrangements – Cell 1 – 8 and Council would be advised of the outcome through the tender report to be presented for this project. Should it be recommended that the underpass be deleted, Council will also be advised of a suitable at-grade crossing alternative.
At the Public Information Session held on 26 November 2009 the main issues arising/discussed are summarised as follows:
· Traffic movements on Kingsway once the Hartman Drive extension is commissioned.
· Removal of existing trees and plans for replacement landscaping.
· Security of adjacent private properties once the road is opened.
· Noise attenuation.
· Underpass, the pros and cons.
· Construction process and associated timeframe.
A wider discussion in relation to the greater road network was also entered into, in particular, how Ocean Reef Road, Gnangara Road, Hepburn Avenue and Mirrabooka Avenue will interlink/operate.
No issues were raised that would have a direct impact on the design as currently being finalised.
Statutory Compliance
The funding contribution that relates to the EWS Cells 5 and 6 is authorised by Part 10 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 and contributions in respect to intersections and outstanding works by developers are authorised by the subdivision approvals issued by the WAPC.
Strategic Implications
The Mirrabooka Avenue Extension is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan (2006-2021) outcomes and objectives.
“Social
2.5 Improve transport options and connections
Economic
3.2 Improve regional infrastructure.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Funding of $6,023,785 has been approved in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget for the design and construction of the Mirrabooka Avenue extension, with a further sum of $307,650 available through developer contribution. However, based on current pre-tender estimates, there is a potential shortfall of funding from the EWS Cell 5 and 6 accounts in order to complete Stage 1, particularly in relation to the inclusion of an underpass.
Looking at the current situation for the Mirrabooka Avenue project it is noted that tender rates received over the last 12-18 months is tending to reflect a trend to more competitive pricing as a consequence of the boom years that have been experienced during early to mid 2000’s. Pre-tender estimating, which generally relies on past performance within the construction industry, is still reflecting in part the higher rates that were incurred as a result of this boom period.
In view of the pre-tender estimate as established, it has been confirmed that the EWS Cell 5 and 6 accounts do not have any additional costs to contribute to the project, similarly, municipal funding is also constrained. However, construction costs received (ie: excluding the costs associated with construction of an underpass) for both the Ocean Reef Road and Hartman Drive projects where less than the pre-tender estimated costs provided for both projects. This would suggest that tender rates should fall in relation to the pre-tender estimated cost provided for the Mirrabooka Avenue project.
Given the potential shortfall in funding it is still suggested that tenders be called, with the underpass scheduled as an optional item so that a decision whether to construct or not can be made when considering tender award.
If budget variations are required to make up any resultant shortfall amounts to complete the construction of the first stage of the Mirrabooka Avenue project, then this will be reported to Council during the tender assessment process.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RECEIVES this report on the progress and funding arrangements for the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension project;
2. NOTES that the Public Information Session held on 26 November 2009 did not raise any issue that would have a direct impact on the design as currently being finalised;
3. AUTHORISES the calling of tenders for the construction of Mirrabooka Avenue Extension from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road (Stage 1), with an option for the construction of a pedestrian underpass; and
4. NOTES that the final extent of works on the Mirrabooka Avenue Extension project and associated funding will be addressed in the report on the tender assessment.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R33/0028V01
File Name: CA Windsor Road And Lancaster Road Upgrade Wangara Project Variation.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Projects Engineer
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an amendment to the approved 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget, including reallocation of funds to meet a funding shortfall for the approved “PR-1279 Windsor Road and Lancaster Road Upgrade, Wangara” project.
Background
The upgrading of Windsor Road and Lancaster Road in Wangara involves sections of resurfacing, rehabilitation and reconstruction. This project is taking longer to complete than originally envisaged due to unforseen circumstances arising during the course of construction. Originally completion was scheduled to occur by Christmas 2009, with the delay resulting in completion being rescheduled to late January 2010.
The delay in completion is primarily due to additional boxing, rubbling and sub-base compaction required to be undertaken in Windsor Road when endeavouring to match new works to the existing pavement. This additional work was not expected as pavement testing undertaken during the investigation/design stages of the project indicated a better standard of existing pavement. As a consequence, a lessor level of rehabilitation works required to upgrade Windsor Road was budgeted for compared to actual works being experienced. As a result of having to rework more of the existing pavement and originally planned, gas and Telstra service relocations have also become necessary. These requirements, with associated costs, were unforseen when the original investigation and associated cost estimate was prepared for this project.
A review of the necessary funding to complete the project has been undertaken in response to the unforseen required additional work.
This report considers the shortfall in funding to complete the Project and seeks reallocation of funds from the 2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program (PR-1087) for which $1.2 million has been allocated.
Detail
In order to complete the Windsor Road and Lancaster Road project, which currently has an allocated budget of $350,000 approved in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget, additional funds are required to cover the following works:
· Increased boxing, rubbling and sub-base compaction in Windsor Road in response to the thinner than anticipated existing pavement depth estimated to be $46,760;
· Gas main lowering/relocation, which is estimated at $27,500;
· Telstra cable lowering/relocation, which is estimated at $10,740, and;
· Additional associated intersection works.
A detailed construction cost estimate has been prepared for the works as described above, with the estimated total cost for the project now being $435,000. Total additional funding required to complete the civil works for the project, which has a current budget allocation of $350,000, is therefore estimated at $85,000.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Completion of the Windsor Road and Lancaster Road project has been delayed due to the condition of the existing pavement in Windsor Road when endeavouring to match new works. As a consequence, a need to relocate both gas and Telstra services has also arisen.
The delay in completing the project by Christmas 2009 as originally envisaged has proven unavoidable as both service providers are unable to lower/relocate services in conformance with the City’s preferred construction timeframe. Also, due to the unforseen costs associated with the lowering/relocating the Telstra service and gas main, no budget existed for this work. It should also be noted that a large portion of Windsor Road included resurfacing, funded from within the original budget.
As a consequence of this and the additional boxing, rubbling and sub-base compaction work in Windsor Road, the project is not able to be completed within budget allocation of $350,000, with a revised estimate to complete being $435,000. It is therefore proposed to reallocate $85,000 in funds from the 2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program to fully complete these works. The Road Resurfacing Program is able to be adjusted to accommodate the resultant decrease in funding as Stage 2 of this program has not yet commenced.
Statutory Compliance
The Manager Finance confirms that the budget variation is in compliance with Part 6 - Financial Management of the Local Government Act and Part 2 - General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Completion of construction for the upgrading of Windsor Road and Lancaster Road in Wangara is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives.
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.5 Improve transport options and connections.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Reallocating funds is possible from the 2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program (ie: has a budget allocation of $1.2 million) in order to accommodate the municipal funding shortfall of $85,000 associated with completion of civil works for the Windsor Road and Lancaster Road project.
The works associated with 2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program are prioritised on a road-by-road basis and at this time Stage 2 of the program has not yet commenced. A reduction in funding will therefore result in a lower priority road resurfacing project(s) being deferred to the 2010/2011 Road Resurfacing Program.
In this instance, the budget for PR-1087 - 2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program is able to be amended to reflect the reallocation of funds to accommodate the shortfall in funding and subsequent completion of PR-1279 - Lancaster and Windsor Road Upgrade, Wangara.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES completion of the additional works in Lancaster Road and Windsor Road at an estimated cost of $85,000 in order to complete PR-1279 - Lancaster and Windsor Road Upgrade; and
2. NOTES the following budget variations to accommodate the shortfall in funding for PR-1279 - Lancaster and Windsor Road Upgrade:
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
PR - 1087 |
$85,000 |
|
2009/2010 Road Resurfacing Program |
PR - 1279 |
|
$85,000 |
Windsor Road and Lancaster Road Upgrade, Wangara |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R36/0010V01
File Name: CA Compass Circle Yanchep Construct Pathway Budget Variation.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Civil Designer
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an amendment to the approved 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget, including reallocation of funds to meet a funding shortfall for the approved “PR-1821 Compass Circle, Yanchep – Construct Pathway” project.
Background
Following detailed design for the installation of a pathway on Compass Circle, Yanchep, issues have arisen that were not identified within the original scope of works. Due to approximately 260m of existing kerbing being in poor condition and having a low profile, it is required to be replaced prior to the path being installed. A higher kerb profile will improve safety for pedestrians using the pathway. Also, existing parking bays within the area of work require upgrading and formalising, as they do not currently comply with Australian Standards. As a result of the proposed works and the topography of the site, sand dune stabilisation is also required to avoid the need to install a retaining wall.
It is noted that part of the original scope of works for the Compass Circle pathway project also includes allowance for the installation of a conservation fence along the full length of the pathway, with controlled access points provided to direct the public via foreshore pathway connectors to the beach.
A review of the necessary funding to complete the revised scope of works has been undertaken.
This report considers the shortfall in funding to complete the revised scope of works associated with the proposed implementation of the Compass Circle pathway project, and seeks reallocation of funds within the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget to accommodate the additional funding requirements.
Detail
In order to complete the Compass Circle pathway project additional funding is required to cover the following works:
· Replacement of approximately 260m of mountable kerb with semi-mountable kerbing located along the western verge of Compass Circle given its poor condition.
· Upgrade of the existing car parking embayment located in the western verge of Compass Circle to comply with Australian Standards.
· Earthworks and stabilisation of the sand dune impacted by a portion of the proposed pathway alignment.
This additional scope of work has resulted in a budget shortfall estimated at $25,540.
Council, at its meeting of 7 April 2009, endorsed five projects for submission to the Public Transport Authority (PTA) for joint finding under the 2009/2010 Accessible Pathways Grant Scheme (IN04-04/09). The PTA has since advised that of the five projects submitted, three were declined funding, namely:
· PR-1922 - Regency Avenue, Madeley – Construct Pathway
· PR-1923 - Driver Road, Darch – Construct Pathway
· PR-1691 - Robinson Avenue, Quinns Rocks – Construct Pathway
As a result of PTA’s decision to decline the three pathway projects listed above, they are unable to proceed, with the municipal component of the funding allocated to these projects in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget available for reallocation.
In addition, installation of conservation fencing at Quinns Rocks (PR-1495) was carried out late last financial year and leaves unexpended funds of $11,000.
The funding shortfall for the Compass Circle pathway project can be met by reallocating unexpended funds from the pathway projects for which PTA funding was not successful and unexpended funds arising from a conservation fencing project for which work had already been completed.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Further scope identified for the construction of the pathway in Compass Circle is considered essential to achieve satisfactory levels of both pedestrian and vehicular functionality and safety in the area. The recommended reallocation of funds is from projects that reflect a scope of work that is of a similar nature to works to be carried out for the Compass Circle pathway project.
Statutory Compliance
The Manager Finance confirms that the budget variation is in compliance with Part 6 - Financial Management of the Local Government Act and Part 2 - General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Completion of construction of the pathway on Compass Circle, Yanchep is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives.
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.5 Improve transport options and connections.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Reallocating funds from the following projects can accommodate the funding shortfall of $25,540 associated with completion of the Compass Circle pathway project:
· PR-1691 – Robinson Avenue, Quinns Rocks – Construct Pathway
PTA has declined funding of $6,365. As a result municipal funds of $6,365 in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget are available for reallocation. This footpath is to be upgraded as part of drainage upgrade works currently being undertaken for Robinson Avenue (PR-1932).
· PR-1922 – Regency Avenue, Madeley – Construct Pathway
PTA has declined funding of $3,375. As a result municipal funds of $3,375 in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget are available for reallocation.
· PR-1923 – Driver Road, Darch – Construct Pathway
PTA has declined funding of $4,800. As a result municipal funds of $4,800 in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget are available for reallocation.
· PR-1495 – Quinns Rocks Foreshore South – Upgrade Fencing
Works carried out late in 2008/2009. Unexpended funds totalling $11,000 available for reallocation (to cover costs of conservation fencing at Compass Circle)
The 2009/2010 Budget will need to be amended to reflect the reallocation of funds to accommodate the shortfall in funding in order to carry out the Compass Circle pathway project.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES that Public Transport Authority funding submissions were unsuccessful for the following projects in the 2009/2010 Capital Work Budget:
a) PR-1691 – Robinson Avenue, Quinns Rocks – Construct Pathway
b) PR-1922 – Regency Avenue, Madeley – Construct Pathway
c) PR-1923 – Driver Road, Darch – Construct Pathway
2. NOTES the following budget variation to reflect the reduction in grant income arising from Public Transport Authority advice as to projects supported/not supported in relation to the City’s 2009/2010 Accessible Pathways Grant Scheme submission:
Cost Code |
Present Budget |
Reduced Amount |
Revised Budget |
931510-8946-501 |
$138,595 |
$14,540 |
124,055 |
3. ENDORSES the following additional civil works required as part of Compass Circle pathway construction at an estimated cost of $25,540:
a) Replacement of approximately 260m of mountable kerb with semi-mountable kerbing located along the western verge of Compass Circle given its poor condition.
b) Upgrade of the existing car parking embayment located in the western verge of Compass Circle to comply with Australian Standards.
c) Earthworks and stabilisation of the sand dune impacted by a portion of the proposed pathway alignment.
4. NOTES the following budget variations to accommodate the shortfall in funding for PR-1821 – Compass Circle, Yanchep – Construct Pathway as follows:
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
PR-1691 |
$6,365 |
|
Robinson Avenue, Quinns Rocks – Construct Pathway |
PR-1922 |
$3,375 |
|
Regency Avenue, Madeley – Construct Pathway |
PR-1923 |
$4,800 |
|
Driver Road, Darch – Construct Pathway |
PR-1495 |
$11,000 |
|
Quinns Rocks Foreshore South – Upgrade Fencing |
PR-1821 |
|
$25,540 |
Compass Circle, Yanchep – Construct Pathway |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: CO09035V01
File Name: DA Tender No 09035 The Supply Installation And Maintenance Of Rubber Softfall.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Landscape Designer
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment: 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider Tender No. 09035 - The Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Rubber Softfall for a period of one year.
Background
Since 2004 the City has moved towards synthetic rubber as preferred softfall material due to an increase in sand pits containing syringes and glass. From 2004 to 2007 the City had a rubber softfall contract with Reclaim Industries. Since 2008 the City’s request for quotation system has been utilised.
In addressing the need to seek tenders the City’s rubber softfall specification has also been updated given technology changes and the availability of new products over the last few years.
Funding allocated in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget for the annual rubber softfall upgrade totals $90,000, as well as provision of new softfall as part of other playground and dry park upgrade projects totalling $150,000. The overall total anticipated expenditure on rubber softfall for this financial year will be in the order of $240,000.
The proposed contract period is 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010 and at the expiry of the initial contract period, the City may consider extending this contract for an additional 12 monthly period or part thereof. Any extension will be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract, with a Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase applied.
Primary details of the proposed contract is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Commencement Date |
1 January 2010 |
Completion Date |
31 December 2010 |
Warranty Period |
3 years |
Extension Permitted |
Yes, 12-months or part thereof with CPI |
Rise And Fall Included |
No |
Detail
This tender was advertised on 17 October 2009 and closed on 10 November 2009. Prices were required to be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Prices shown on Attachment 1.
Four tenders were received by the closing date and one received late as detailed in Table 2.
Table 2: Tenders Received For Tender 09035
Company |
Conforming/Non-Conforming |
DME Contractors |
Conforming |
Retech Rubber |
Conforming |
Evergreen |
Conforming |
Reclaim Industries Limited |
Non-Conforming (No schedule of rates received) |
Astro Synthetic Turf |
Late, Non-conforming |
The Tender Evaluation Panel comprising the Landscape Projects Designer, Parks and Conservation Projects Officer and Contracts Officer has evaluated the three conforming tenders based upon the selection criteria detailed in Table 3:
Table 3: Tender Assessment Criteria
ITEM No. |
DESCRIPTION |
|
1 |
Price for the Services offered |
60% |
2 |
Tenderer’s previous experience |
20% |
3 |
Tenderer’s resources |
10% |
4 |
Safety Management |
10% |
The Tender Evaluation Team scored each conforming tender against the established criteria to determine the overall weighted score and reported as follows:
Price for the Works Offered:
Based on the prices submitted for the major items used by the City, a cost comparison has been undertaken and the three companies with conforming tenders have been ranked in the following order under this criterion:
COMPANY |
RANK |
Evergreen |
1 |
Retech Rubber |
2 |
DME Contractors |
3 |
Tenderer’s Relevant Experience:
Tenderers have demonstrated varying levels of experience in carrying out works similar to the tendered works. This level of experience has been reflected in the weightings applied in the Selection Criteria. Retech Rubber has been in this industry for much longer than the two other companies and has completed more high profile projects within WA.
Based on the information provided, tenderers have been ranked in the following order:
COMPANY |
RANK |
Retech Rubber |
1 |
Evergreen |
2 |
DME Contractors |
3 |
Tenderer’s Resources:
Both Evergreen and Retech Rubber have provided relevant and useful details for the tendered works in terms of their plant and equipment, personnel and current work commitments. Retech Rubber and Evergreen were ranked equally. Tenderers’ resources have been considered and these have been reflected in the weightings applied to this Selection Criteria.
Based on the information provided, tenderers have been ranked in the following order:
COMPANY |
RANK |
Retech Rubber |
1 |
Evergreen |
1 |
DME Contractors |
2 |
Safety Management:
Evidence of safety management policies and practices were assessed from the tender documents. The assessment for safety management was based on the tenderers’ responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included within the tender documentation, as well as relevant attached documents. Retech Rubber has provided relevant and informative details of their safety management systems, which includes the statistics of their work incidents.
Based on the information provided, tenderers have been ranked in the following order:
COMPANY |
RANK |
Retech Rubber |
1 |
Evergreen |
2 |
DME Contractors |
3 |
Overall Ranking Assessment:
The tenderers’ submissions were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process and the consolidated overall ranking of tenderers is shown as follows:
COMPANY |
RANK |
Retech Rubber |
1 |
Evergreen |
2 |
DME Contractors |
3 |
Comment
Based on the Tender Evaluation Team’s assessment of the tender submissions, it is recommended that Tender No 09035 from Retech Rubber be accepted in accordance with the tender evaluation results.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and properly evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated regulations.
The Manager Governance and Executive Services has reviewed the tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process.
Strategic Implications
The provision of synthetic rubber softfall is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006-2021) outcome objective as follows:
“Healthy Communities
2.6 To provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
All works undertaken under this contract will be funded through works associated with projects involving rubber softfall that have been approved in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget and from funds approved for the 2009/2010 Maintenance Budget as applicable.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 09035 from Retech Rubber for The Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Rubber Softfall at the tendered rates submitted for a period of one year from 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2010, with an option to extend for a further 12 month period, or part thereof, at Council’s discretion.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: R34/0033V01
File Name: EA Parking Prohibitions Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre Laneway.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Russell Hewitt
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the installation of parking prohibitions in the Right of Way (ROW) at the rear of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre (WLCC), between Rocca Way and Yagan Place, Wanneroo.
Background
The WLCC is serviced from the rear through the ROW running between Rocca Way and Yagan Place. Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan identifying the subject area.
Detail
The ROW is six metres wide and parked vehicles are blocking access to the WLCC’s service bay.
Consultation
Consultation was undertaken with WLCC staff as the vehicle parking impacts on the operation of this facility.
Comment
To ensure access to the WLCC service bay at all times, the proposed parking prohibitions will prohibit stopping and parking on either side on the ROW along its full length, as shown in Drawing No 2519-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
Statutory Compliance
The ROW is a thoroughfare under the control of the City of Wanneroo.
Council endorsement is required to implement any parking prohibitions that are provided in accordance with the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003 (as amended).
Strategic Implications
The installation of parking prohibitions in the ROW at the rear of the WLCC is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improve community safety
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost to install parking prohibitions in the ROW at the rear of the WLCC is $500, which can be funded from Project No PR-1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking Upgrade, for which a total of $10,000 has been provided in the 2009/2010 Capital Works Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of ‘No Stopping’, (R5-35) signs on both sides of the ROW at the rear of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre, between Rocca Way and Yagan Place, Wanneroo, as shown on Drawing No 2519-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. APPROVES the installation of ‘No Stopping’ yellow edgelines on both sides of the ROW at the rear of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre, between Rocca Way and Yagan Place, Wanneroo, as shown on Drawing No 2519-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
LOCATION MAP – Wanneroo Library & Culture Centre Laneway
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
Proposed Parking Prohibitions – Wanneroo Library and Culture Centre Laneway
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S16/0070V01
File Name: F State Underground Power Program Round Five.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Manager Asset Management
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an invitation from the State Underground Power Steering Committee, on behalf of the State Government, to submit an Expression of Interest in Round Five: Major Residential Projects of the Underground Power Program.
Background
Severe storms in May 1994 resulted in widespread blackouts across Perth in which power supplies were badly affected. As a consequence the State Government established the State Underground Power Program (SUPP) to embark on converting overhead power supplies to encourage the implementation of underground power. Its stated long-term goal when first announced was to have at least half the houses in Perth supplied with underground power by the year 2010. The management of the SUPP is overseen by the Underground Power Steering Committee, chaired by the Office of Energy and has representatives from Western Power and Western Australian Local Government Association.
The SUPP has the following two streams:
· Major Residential Projects (MRPs) - the undergrounding of distribution lines in suburban residential areas consisting usually between 800 and 1,300 properties
· Localised Enhancement Projects (LEPs) which targets non-metropolitan areas which may only involve the undergrounding of around 1,000 metres of distribution lines. LEPs aim to beautify “gateways”, traffic routes of significance and centres of tourism and/or heritage.
The City of Wanneroo has declined in the past to submit applications due to time and budget constraints (Items TS134-04/95, TS57-04/98 and TS05-03/02 refers).
Detail
The selection process for Round Five will be undertaken in two-stages, which, whilst it may lengthen the time for selection, will reduce the cost for local authorities and shorten the overall time to implementation. It will also provide more certainty with regard to costs and scope of the project, prior to an agreement being finalised with the local authority. The two stages are as follows:
1. Expression of Interest (EOI) Stage:
Rather than seeking proposals for projects in the first instance, the Steering Committee proposes to only seek an EOI from Councils to participate.
Under this proposal, Councils will be able to nominate the areas in which they are interested in undergrounding power without backing up their EOI with a lengthy submission and definitive evidence of community support. It will reduce the cost of submission preparation for local authorities.
2. Detailed Proposal Stage:
Once EOI’s have been submitted, Western Power and the Office of Energy will short-list a number of municipalities. Short-listed Councils will be invited to develop detailed proposals in consultation with Western Power and the Office of Energy.
Issues such as level of community support, final project boundaries, Western Power design and costs and the draft Agreement will be resolved in co-operation with Western Power, the respective Council and the Office of Energy, prior to a project being finally selected and approved for funding. Previously, many of these issues have only been addressed subsequent to projects being approved.
The funding of agreed projects is to be shared equally between the State and the participating government authority, funded 50% Local Government, 25% Western Power and 25% State Government. The Steering Committee has also introduced a further subsidy of 15% of the total cost to local government authorities to encourage areas of low socio–economic status to take part in SUPP. It is however intended that this additional subsidy is limited to one area identified as being of low socio–economic status in the SUPP. The Socio Economic Index For Areas (SEIFA) developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics will determine eligibility.
Further information can be obtained from SUPP “Guidelines for Round Five Major Residential Projects” publication. A copy of these guidelines has been placed in the Elected Members’ reading room
Previously, Council may have chosen to submit a smaller area for a Localised Enhancement Project, such as Wanneroo Road in the Wanneroo Town Centre. This would be comparable to similar projects funded in previous rounds of the scheme, however at present only the scheme for Major Residential Projects has received funding.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The estimated average cost of retrospectively undergrounding power is around $5,000 to $6,000 per lot. The actual costs vary considerably depending on the soil type, housing density, and congestion of the underground services in the road reserve and other factors.
The areas that could benefit from this program are mainly the City’s older suburbs of Marangaroo, Girrawheen, Koondoola, Alexander Heights, Wanneroo, Quinns Rocks, Two Rocks and Yanchep.
A firm costing for each individual project is not available and the likely cost of reinstatement works cannot be identified. The short time frame to register an interest in the project does not enable detailed costing or financial implications to be adequately addressed.
Based on a minimum cost of $5,000 per property and undergrounding of power lines to 1,200 properties per round of funding, ie., criteria set at 800 properties as a minimum to 1300 maximum, the total cost to a single project would be in the order of $6M. With the State Government’s commitment to contribute 50% of the costs over two years, the City’s contribution would be in the order of $3M over the two year period.
The cost to Council could, in part be offset by a 50% contribution from the individual property owners, who will receive the benefit of the scheme directly through a better level of service and improved streetlighting and indirectly through increased property prices. Such a scheme does occur with some Councils taking part in the program.
The funding of the undergrounding of all power within the City needs to be considered. On review of a suburb, such as Girrawheen, where the number of properties connected to power is in the order of 3,400 and with a rate of $5,000 per property, this would equate to a total cost of $17M, with 50% to be contributed by the City.
Notwithstanding the source of Council’s funding, the supply of power and the associated infrastructure it is the responsibility of the State Government through Western Power. The Underground Power Program achieves renewal and upgrade of Western Power’s infrastructure, with 50% paid for by the City’s ratepayers.
Should Council wish to progress with an application for Underground Power, the amount of funding to be provided from the affected residents and the mechanism to provide any funding must be considered. The two main options are for the City to fund its share of the cost of the underground works or adopt a user pays principle.
Based on the scenario above for 1,200 properties, the cost to Council would be in the order of $3M per project over two years, ie, $1.5M annually.
A user pays principle appears consistent with the likely direct benefits provided to the affected residents. Other Councils have adopted this funding principle. A major factor in the selection criteria influencing the progress of the underground power program is that the application has the support and acceptance of the affected community and the City’s ratepayers in general to establish the funding arrangements. It is suggested that a Community Survey be conducted to determine the level of community support for underground power and whether property owners would be prepared to fully fund the local government 50% contribution to the scheme.
Should Council consider a funding application for this round of the program-, then Council should consider funding the undergrounding of power for the remainder of the City. Any decision to contribute towards the SUPP will need to take into account of the continuing financial commitment for the City should undergrounding of power be progressed.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The undergrounding of power is consistent with the City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan (2006/2021) outcome and objective:
“Healthy Communities
2.5 Provide and manage infrastructure to meet the needs of our community.”
Policy Implications
Any decisions and commitment to the program will increase pressures on the City’s budget in future proposals for other eligible areas in the municipality. A policy will need to be developed whereby any decisions made to fund these projects are equitable should it be agreed to proceed with an underground power program.
Financial Implications
A contribution from Council towards the provision of underground power is not included in the 10 Year Capital Works Budget. To incorporate any funding, projects already within the budget will have to be deferred.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT submit an application for Round Five Major Residential Projects of the State Underground Power Program, as it considers such a program should be wholly funded by the State Government as it is part of its asset management responsibility; and
2. CONSIDERS, as a New Initiative in the 2010/2011 Operating Budget, funding to undertake community surveys in the suburbs of Marangaroo, Girrawheen, Koondoola, Alexander Heights, Wanneroo, Quinns Rocks, Two Rocks and Yanchep to determine the level of community support to participate and contribute the whole of Council’s contribution toward the State Underground Power Program on a user pays principle in readiness for the next round of invitations scheduled for 2012.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R/0010V07
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Karen Delves
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
File Name: F Public Guidance in road Reserves Policy Review.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider amendments to the Public Guidance In Roads Reserves Policy No. 7.3.10.
Background
The current Public Guidance Signage in Road Reserves Policy was implemented in May 2001, reviewed in 2003, 2005, 2007 and was due for renewal on 1 March 2009.
Detail
The key changes are detailed below and have been made in the revised policy.
Policy Objectives
Two objectives have been added to this section to provide better definition of suitable locations:
“Ensure that advertising signs are consistent with and appropriate to their location and function and;
Prevents visual pollution of advertising signs and avoids dangerous placements to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic.”
2.1 Direction Signs (Urban Areas)
This policy has been amended to comply with Australian Standard AS1742.5-1997 Part 5: Street name and Community facility name signs. Descriptions have been to correspond with Main Roads WA approval.
This changed section is:
2.1.1(a) Public Guidance to the location of facilities (generally of a non-commercial nature) such as:
Town
Halls, Municipal Offices, Civic Centres, Depots and Libraries;
Rubbish Disposal and Recycling Sites;
Churches and Religious institutions;
Hospitals;
Sporting Recreational grounds and facilities;
Tertiary education facilities;
Non-profit Organisations;
Cultural Institutions;
Police Stations, Post Offices;
Railways Stations, and Coach Stations;
Shopping Centres (see clause 2.1.1(b);
Medical Centres, Veterinary Clinics, Dentists.
2.1.1(b) On review of this section, Administration has concluded that due to the numerous requests for individual signage within a Shopping Complex and the limited space available the following would apply:
Commercial services and facilities, however a sign will not be approved for an establishment that forms part of a larger complex (ie: a fingerboard sign will not be approved for a delicatessen within a shopping centre).
2.1.2 Description list reduced to more “general” descriptors.
Wording is to be ‘generic’ in nature to avoid direct advertising of business names with the wording standardised eg Shopping Centre, Medical Centre, Child Care Centre etc.
2.1.4 Section amended to correspond with the City’s District Planning Scheme Number 2 (DPS2). The scheme has been developed to minimise the occurrence of signage to ensure a high level of amenity is maintained in a residential area. ‘Offsite” advertising for any home business is inconsistent with the scheme provisions and may have a detrimental affect on local area amenity and therefore should be excluded from the City’s Streets signage Policy.
Direction Signs reflecting home businesses are not permitted within a residential area
(to ensure a high level of amenity).
2.1.6 This amendment to the Policy is in accordance with Australian Standard AS1742.5-1997.
Where community facility name signs or similar signs are installed on the same post as a street name sign, the street name sign shall be located above the other signs and there shall be a clearance of at least 150mm between the bottom of the street name plate sign and the top of any other sign.
Due to the restriction in the number of signs at any one location, City Administration has amended the Policy as follows to reflect priority.
Due to the limit of five direction signs per intersection, commercial business will have to be considered in order of priority in providing aid or comfort over and above other commercial enterprises eg:
· Medical Centres;
· Dental Surgeries;
· Veterinary Clinic;
· Pharmacies etc.
Consultation
A briefing on this policy amendment was given to Council forum on 24 November 2009.
Comment
These amendments will result in the “Public Guidance Signage In Roads Policy” being more streamlined and easier to administer for the organisation and easier for community groups and organisations groups to apply for and:
· Prevent visual pollution of advertising signs and avoids dangerous placements to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
· Descriptions amended to correspond with Main Roads WA policy.
· Priority given to Commercial Businesses providing aid or comfort over and above other commercial enterprises.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Public Guidance In Road Reserves – Policy Review is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 objectives and outcomes;
“Social - Healthy, safe vibrant and connected communities.
2.4 Improve community safety;
Economic - A prosperous region achieved through economic growth and employments.
3.5 Increase support for new and existing businesses”.
Policy Implications
The purpose of this report is to recommend changes to the Public Guidance Signage In Road Reserves Policy Number 7.3.10
The intent of the Public Guidance Signage In Road Reserves Policy is to provide public guidance signage to assist the public in locating community and commercial services and facilities within the City of Wanneroo.
Reviewing this policy supports Council’s objective of reviewing and developing policies covering signage within the City of Wanneroo.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the amended Public Guidance Signage In Road Reserves Policy as follows:
Public Guidance Signage In Road Reserves
Policy Owner: Asset Management
Distribution: City of Wanneroo Officers
Implementation: 01 May 2001 – W155-05/01
Scheduled Review:
01 November 2009
New Review: 01 November 2011
Objective
To provide public guidance signage to assist the public in locating community and commercial services and facilities within the City of Wanneroo (the City) and;
Ensure that advertising signs are consistent with and appropriate to their location and function and;
Prevents visiual pollution of advertising signs and avoids dangerous placements to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
Statement
Approval to place a public guidance sign within the road reserve requires a written application advising preferred wording with a supporting street plan identifying signage location(s). The City’s approval needs to be obtained prior to assessment of supply and/or installation cost or whether a bond is applicable.
Public guidance that require the City’s approval prior to installation include:
§ Direction Signs (Urban and Rural Areas)
§ Tourist Signs
§ Temporary Community Advertising Signs
§ Service Club Signs
§ Land Estate Development Signs
§ Industrial Estate Signs
1. General Requirements for Public Guidance Signage
The following general requirements apply for all public guidance signage located in the road reserve applications unless otherwise advised:
1.1 The City will undertake routine general maintenance associated with approved permanent signage located within the road reserve but accepts no responsibility for damage and/or public liability claim arising as a result of vandalism, accident or wear and tear. Where signs are deemed by the City to require more than routine general maintenance, then they will be removed and returned to the applicant where known. If unknown, then these signs will be impounded at the City’s Ashby Operations Centre Compound.
1.2 The City will not undertake routine general maintenance associated with approved temporary signage located within the road reserve and accepts no responsibility for damage and/or public liability claim arising as a result of vandalism, accident or wear and tear. Where signs are deemed by the City to be causing a nuisance or are considered to be a safety hazard then they will be removed and returned to the applicant where known. If unknown, then these signs will be impounded at the City’s Ashby Operations Centre Compound.
1.3 The City’s Ashby Operations Centre Compound Stores Supervisor is empowered to collect an impounding fee on a per sign basis or call on the bond for the return of signs collected by its personnel, or appointed contractor(s), unless approved otherwise. Any signs held in the Ashby Operations Centre Compound for longer than a 30 day period from the time it was collected will be disposed to the tip site.
1.4 Public guidance signage to be located along Wanneroo Road requires Main Roads WA (MRWA) approval. Applications will be assessed by the City in the first instance and if approved they will be forwarded to MRWA for consideration. MRWA’s decision is final.
2. Specific Requirements for Public Guidance Signage
Specific requirements for the various public guidance signage options follows:
2.1 Direction Signs (Urban Areas)
Subject to approval by the City’s Administration, Direction Signs in the urban area will be provided in accordance with the following criteria:
2.1.1(a) Public guidance to the location of facilities (generally of a non-commercial nature) such as:
Town Halls, Municipal Offices, Civic Centres, Depots and Libraries
Rubbish Disposal and Recycling Sites
Churches and religious institutions
Sporting, recreational grounds and facilities
Tertiary education facilities
Non-profit Organisations
Cultural Institutions/sites
Police Stations
Post Offices
Railway Stations and Coach Stations
Shopping Centres (see clause 2.1.1(b)
Hospitals
Medical Centres, Veterinary Clinics, Dentists
2.1.1(b) Commercial services and facilities, however a sign will not be approved for an establishment that forms part of a larger complex ie: a fingerboard sign will not be approved for a delicatessen with a shopping centre.
2.1.2 Wording is to be “generic” in nature and is to avoid direct advertising of business names with the wording standardised, eg., Shopping Centre, Medical Centre, Child Care Centre etc.
2.1.3 Where commercial business is involved, evidence of planning approval in relation to the business activity being undertaken is to be provided in support of an application.
2.1.4 Direction Signs reflecting a home businesses are not permitted within a residential area (to ensure a high level of amenity).
2.1.5 Up to two Direction Signs may be erected on a single pole identifying a street name. In this respect, the signs will be manufactured to the standard length so that in the long term it is possible to convert from the single pole to a stack sign situation.
2.1.6 Up to five Direction signs may be located at any one location by utilising a two pole sign stack, the street name shall be located above the other signs and there shall be a clearance of at least 150mm between the bottom of the street name plate sign and the top of any other sign.
Due to the limit of five direction signs per intersection, commercial business will have to be considered in order of priority in providing aid or comfort over and above other commercial enterprises eg:
§ Medical Centres;
§ Dental Surgeries;
§ Veterinary Clinic;
§ Pharmacies;
2.1.7 Direction Sign wording will be white lettering on blue background. Generally signs placed on arterial roads shall have 200 mm deep finger plates placed at a minimum distance of 100 metres prior to the junction and local roads with 150 mm deep finger plates to be placed at the junction.
2.1.8 Direction signs are to be positioned on the intersection at the entrance to the side road down which the signed premises are located.
2.1.9 Direction Signs on arterial roads shall be limited to one signed route from any arterial road in either direction with such signing restricted to a maximum of two arterial roads.
2.1.10 No Direction Signs are to be erected adjacent to the community and commercial service and/or facility.
Approved Direction Signs in urban areas are supplied and installed by the City at the applicant’s cost.
2.2 Direction Signs (Rural Areas)
Subject to approval by the City’s Administration, Direction Signs in the rural area will be provided in accordance with the requirements outlined for Direction Signs (Urban Areas) above, with arterial roads considered the important collector roads servicing the rural area.
Approval will be granted for Direction Signs indicating rural produce where the applicant holds a current stall-holder’s licence.
Approved Direction Signs in rural areas are supplied and installed by the City at the applicant’s cost.
2.3 Tourist Signs
Approval to place Tourist signage within the road reserve will need to comply with the Western Australian Tourism Commission “Essential Criteria” in the first instance. Upon receipt of an application in compliance with the WA Tourism Commissions criteria and supported by the City’s endorsement the application is then forwarded to Main Roads WA for their consideration/approval. If approved the cost of the signage is to be borne by the applicant and installation undertaken by Main Roads WA.
2.4 Temporary Community Advertising Signs
Subject to approval by the City’s Administration, a maximum of ten Temporary Community Advertising Signs per application of up to 0.5 square metres in area per sign will be permitted for non-profit organisations only for up to a maximum period of six weeks. A bond (refundable if conditions of approval are met) is payable prior to confirmation of approval to cover the cost of removal of the sign(s) by the City where necessary.
Following receipt of the City’s formal approval the applicant is responsible for the supply, installation, maintenance and subsequent removal of the approved Temporary Community Advertising Sign(s).
2.5 Service Club Signs
Subject to approval by the City’s Administration, Service Club Signs are allowed to be erected in the road reserve adjacent to the facility where the Club meets. A plan depicting the size and style of the sign inclusive of foundation details needs to be provided in support of the application requirements.
The City’s approval will require the Club to arrange for supply and delivery of the sign to the City’s Ashby Depot Compound and on receipt the City will undertake installation at the Club’s cost.
2.6 Land Estate Development Signs
Land Estate Developers are entitled to two Land Estate Development Signs per estate indicating the marketed name of the land release. Generally signs placed on arterial roads shall have 200 mm deep finger plates placed at a minimum distance of 100 metres prior to the junction and local roads with 150 mm deep finger plates to be placed at the junction. Sign colours will consist of a blue background with yellow lettering and be placed on poles identifying a street name or stacks as outlined for Direction Signs (Urban Areas) above.
The signs will be removed by the City on receipt of advice from the applicant that land sales have been completed or after two years following initial installation, whichever occurs first.
Approved Land Estate Development Signs are supplied and installed by the City at the applicant’s cost.
2.7 Industrial Estate Signs
Areas zoned as an Industrial Estate are signed as a general area (eg., Wangara Estate, Flynn Drive Industrial Area, etc.) with no further signing permitted. Signage is to conform to the requirements outlined for Direction Signs (Urban Areas) above.
Approved Industrial Estate Signs are supplied and installed by City at no charge to the business enterprises within the Industrial Estate benefiting from that sign.
All signage for new business enterprises within an Industrial Estate is controlled through the development approval process and the City’s Signs Local Law 1999.
Subject to approval by the City’s Administration, a temporary sign for a new tenant in a multi-unit premises within an Industrial Estate of up to 0.5 square metres in area may be located in the road reserve adjacent to their premises for up to a maximum of three months. A bond is payable prior to confirmation of approval to cover the cost of removal of the sign where necessary. Following receipt of the City’s formal approval the applicant is responsible for the supply, installation, maintenance and removal of the approved temporary sign.
Responsibility for Implementation
Manager Asset Management
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0131V01
File Name: BA Nature Strip.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Manager Infrastructure Maintenance
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a review of Nature Strip (Verge) Treatment – Protective Devices Policy.
Background
The current Nature Strip (Verge) Treatment – Protective Devices policy was adopted by Council at its meeting on 23 September 2003. A review of this policy was undertaken in 2005, which recommended that no changes to the policy were needed. This remains the City’s current policy on Nature Strip (Verge) Protection Devices. Refer Attachment 1.
At the Council meeting of 16 December 2008, Cr Newton presented a Motion on Notice (Item MN02-12/08 refers) regarding Nature Strip Protection Devices. It was indicated that due to increased levels of damage to the nature strips due to hooning,. The following recommendation was adopted:
“That Council REQUESTS Administration to urgently review the Policy – “Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices” and the Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999 to seek a solution to allow residents to obtain approval from Council when due to ongoing incidents, feel they need to install a protective device on their nature strip, subject to applications only being considered from residents who can demonstrate ongoing hooning and associated damage to the nature strip outside their place of residence.”
Detail
The matters relating to verge treatment – protective devices has been considered by Council previously. Research into the issues associated with verge protective devices was undertaken and presented to Council on 13 March 2007 (Item IN04-03/07 refers). Attachment 2 contains extracts from this item relating to the Local Government Act 1995 and Local Government (Uniform Local Provisions) Regulations 1996, as well as advice from the Local Government Insurance Services WA, presented to Council previously.
Council has local laws restricting the type of material that can be used on the nature strip, some residents would like to protect their fences, walls and homes by installing protective device such as bollards. The current preferred option is to allow for a modified higher semi-mountable or barrier kerb, paid for by the adjacent property owner, with water sensitive, landscape treatments to the nature strip. This type of treatment, with 600mm high shrubs, planted 1.5m from the kerb edge is considered to be less attractive to hoon drivers.
Further research has been undertaken to determine practices adopted by other local authorities in this regard. This research shows that the City’s guidelines are very similar in content, which in summary include:
· That a portion of the verge area immediately adjacent to the kerb area being kept free of any planting.
· The garden does not include any walls, built structures or obstructions of any kind.
· The garden does not create any sight obstructions for pedestrians or people driving vehicles.
The City of Swan recently produced Landscaping Guidelines for Streetscapes and Public Space dated 3 August 2009, which advise that:
“Bollards shall be located on the property boundary or, where appropriate, aligned with peripheral tree planting”.
In ‘industrial or commercial’ areas the City has previously permitted the installation of ‘pine logs’ as a verge treatment protection device. However, this potentially leaves the City to liability should incidents causing personal or property damage occur involving bollards in the road reserve. Even if the City does decide to change Local Laws and make provision for ‘bollards’ or other types of devices to support property owners who want to protect their nature strips from hoon activity, there are serious risk management issues for the City that could potentially expose the City to legal claims and challenges.
The application of the City of Swan’s guidelines therefore is considered more appropriate. Accordingly, it is proposed that the policy relating to commercial and industrial properties is brought in line with that of residential properties, by prohibiting any form of bollard or obstruction from being installed on the nature strip. A similar treatment which would allow the installation of a modified higher semi-mountable or barrier kerb, paid for by the adjacent property owner, with water sensitive landscape treatments to the nature strip, is recommended. The property owner would also be allowed to install bollards or peripheral trees aligned with their fence.
A change in the practice relating to Industrial/Commercial areas would not alter the circumstances relating to those properties which have already installed bollards or similar treatment in the road reserve. This situation is similar to the situation of illegal verge treatments throughout the City. As advised to Council (Item IN09-09/08 refers) the City does not proactively monitor and enforce Section 8 of the Local Government and Public Property Law 1999 (Amendment Local Law 2008), however there is a process in place to respond to any specific complaints that are received. Actions undertaken in this regard are often low priority tasks. To facilitate the process of more proactively clearing up non-compliant verge treatments significant additional resources would be required.
In light of advice received, it is considered injudicious to recommend an amendment to the Council’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999 and Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices to allow for the construction of protective devices on nature strips. The following three main amendments to the current Nature Strip Treatment – Protective Devices Policy are proposed:
1. The installation of bollards or any other form of obstruction will not be permitted in residential, commercial or industrial areas.
2. Bollards are only permitted on private land at the property fence.
3. Semi-mountable or barrier kerbing may be installed adjacent to the nature strip for residential, commercial or industrial areas.
Consultation
The review of this policy and the proposed amendment was discussed at the Council Forum held on 1 December 2009 and it was decided to present this matter to the Council at this meeting.
Comment
In observance with the previous legal advice and insurance implications, Administration does not support the installation of protective devices such as bollards and non-frangible structures within the road reserve. The City need to be proactive in eliminating any risks associated with the installation of such devices. Therefore an amended policy, without the provision of bollards or non-frangible structures within the road reserve as verge protection devices is supported.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The review of the Nature Strip (Verge) Policy is consistent with the City’s strategic plan (2006-2021) outcome objective: -
“Social
Healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities”
Policy Implications
It is proposed that the City amend the “Nature Strip Treatment – Protective Devices” policy to specifically include residential, commercial and industrial verge areas.
Financial Implications
The amendment to the policy does not have direct financial implications to the City. However, should the Council proceed with a proactive approach in dealing with the issue of verge obstructions, additional resources will be required to effectively manage this responsibility. The additional resources comprising a Technical Officer, a vehicle and associated overheads will cost in the order of $100,000 per annum potentially for up to a three-year period.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS the amended Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices policy as follows:
Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices
Policy Owner: Infrastructure Maintenance
Distribution: All employees
Implementation: 15 December 2009 Council Meeting
Scheduled Review: Reviewed 15 December 2009 Council Meeting at Item No IN0 –12/09
Next Review: December 2012
Objective
To establish policy guidelines to enable property owners to protect landscaping, water reticulation systems and to discourage parking on the nature strip (formerly known as the verge).
Statement
Property owners may make written application to the City’s Director Infrastructure for the installation of semi mountable or mountable kerbing within the nature strip to protect landscaping, water reticulation systems and to discourage parking on the nature strip.
Bollards
The installation of bollards or any other form of obstruction on the nature strip is not approved. Any installation of bollards should be restricted to the property boundary. The City will also consider installation of trees at the property boundary on a case-by-case basis.
Semi-mountable Kerbing
Where damage to the nature strip adjacent to a residential, commercial or industrial property is occurring semi mountable or barrier kerbing may be installed at the full cost of the property owner. However, any action agreed to is subject to a site investigation being undertaken by City Administration personnel to determine the cause for vehicular over-runs, and if appropriate, the cost of agreed kerbing installation. Implementation of the approved works will be undertaken by the City on receipt of written agreement from the property owner to proceed with the work at the quoted cost. The City will continue to provide information on suitable water sensitive landscaping and planting options for residents as required.
Responsibility for Implementation
Assessment/Approval - Manager, Infrastructure Maintenance
Compliance – Manager Regulatory Services
2. NOTES that the City’s Nature Strip (Verge) Guidelines will be amended to incorporate the changes to the policy and inclusion of water sensitive garden treatments for nature strips.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices
___________________________________________________________________________
Policy Owner: Technical Services
Distribution: All employees
Implementation: 23 September 2003 Council Meeting at Item TS14-09/03
Scheduled Review: Reviewed 7 June 2005 Council Meeting at Item TS15-06/05
Next Review: 1 July 2008
___________________________________________________________________________
Objective
To establish policy guidelines to enable property owners to protect landscaping, water reticulation systems and to discourage parking on the nature strip (formerly known as the verge).
Statement
Property owners may make written application to the City’s Director Infrastructure for the installation of semi mountable or mountable kerbing within the nature strip to protect landscaping, water reticulation systems and to discourage parking on the nature strip.
Bollards
The installation of bollards on the nature strip shall only be approved for commercial or industrial zoned properties at the property owners expense and to the satisfaction of the Director Technical Services in accordance City of Wanneroo Drawing No TS01-1. Implementation and subsequent maintenance of the approved works is the responsibility of the property owner and shall advise the City in writing when the works have been completed.
Semi-mountable Kerbing
Where damage to the nature strip adjacent to a residential property is occurring semi mountable kerbing may be installed at the full cost of the property owner. However, any action agreed to is subject to a site investigation being undertaken by City Administration personnel to determine the cause for vehicular over-runs, and if appropriate, the cost of agreed kerbing installation. Implementation of the approved works will be undertaken by the City on receipt of written agreement from the property owner to proceed with the work at the quoted cost.
Responsibility for Implementation
Assessment/Approval - Manager, Infrastructure Services
Kerbing Construction - Manager, Operations
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Attachment 2
Page 1 of 3
Extract from council Report Item IN04-03/07
Details of the City’s current policy, local law, extracts from the Local Government (Uniform Local Provisions) Regulations 1996, advice received from the City’s insurance broker – Local Government Insurance Services WA, legal advice from the City’s lawyers Woodhouse Legal and the Department of Local Government and Regional development regarding this issue, is outlined below:
Policy – “Nature Strip Treatments – Protective Devices”
Council’s current policy allows for “property owners to make written submissions to the City’s Director Infrastructure for the installation of semi mountable kerbing or bollards within the nature strip to protect landscaping, water reticulation systems and to discourage parking on the nature strip”. Residential property owners may only make application for semi mountable kerbing whilst commercial property owners may apply for the installation of bollards. The policy (Attachment 1) further details conditions relating to both semi mountable kerbing and bollards.
Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999
Council’s Local Law prescribes that “A person shall not on or from any local government property, without having first obtained a written approval from the local government to do so…
(g) Carry out any works in a street, thoroughfare or other public place, including but not limited to: -
(i) Nature strip (verge) treatments;
(ii) Vehicle crossing treatment.”
Part 8 of the Local Law prescribes permissible nature strip treatments and the owner and occupier’s responsibilities for nature strip treatments, which relate only to the planting and maintenance of lawn and garden and installing a hard surface. The local law supports the City’s policy requiring written approval to allow for further treatments such as semi mountable kerbing to protect residential nature strip.
The Local Government Act 1995 and Local Government (Uniform Local Provisions) Regulations 1996
The above Act and Regulation sets out conditions relating to the construction of anything in a public thoroughfare or public place without the permission of the local government.
The Local Government Act 1995, Sch. 9.1 cl. 8 refers: -
“8. Private works on, over, or under public places
(1) Regulations may be made to prohibit or control the construction of anything on, over, or under a public thoroughfare or other public place that is local government property.
(2) Subclause (1) does not apply to the construction of things by or on behalf of the Crown or under the authority of an Act.
(3) Regulations cannot authorise permanent or unreasonable obstruction of the ordinary and reasonable use of the public thoroughfare or other public place for the purpose to which it is dedicated.
Attachment 2
Page 2 of 3
(4) Section 3.25 applies as if anything constructed as mentioned in this clause were land owned by the person who constructed it an occupied by the persons entitled to use it.
(5) Regulations may require anything constructed in accordance with regulations to be maintained and may require the person who constructs it to insure against any liability that the local government may incur in connection with its construction, maintenance, or use.”
Regulations 17 refer: -
“17. Private works on, over, or under public places – Sch. 9.1 cl. 8
1. A person who constructs anything on, over, or under a public thoroughfare or other public place that is local government property without first obtaining written permission from the local government commits an offence.
2. A local government may –
(a) Grant permission to construct anything on, over, or under a public thoroughfare or other public place that is local government property; and
(b) Impose conditions in respect of the permission, which may include a condition imposing a charge for any damage to the public thoroughfare or public place resulting from the construction.
3. It is a condition of the permission that the ordinary and reasonable use of the public thoroughfare or public place for the purpose to which it is dedicated is not to be permanently or unreasonably obstructed.
4. A person who fails to comply with a condition of the permission commits an offence.
5. A person who constructs anything in accordance with permission under this section is required to –
(a) Maintain it; and
(b) Obtain from an insurance company approved by the local government an insurance policy, in the joint names of the local government and the person, indemnifying the local government against any claim for damages which may arise in, or out of, its construction, maintenance or use.
6. A person who fails to comply with sub regulation (5) commits an offence.
7. The penalty for an offence under sub regulation (1), (4), or (6) is $1,000.”
Advice from Local Government Insurance Services WA
The Local Government Insurance Services WA has advised that an arrangement has been put in place for the benefit of all council/ratepayers/residents, to cover residents who place their bins on the nature strip and also when mowing nature strips for no reward. The policy does not extend to cover a resident in situations where bollards are placed on the nature strip.
Should death or injury occur resulting from an accident involving nature strip bollards, the Council could then be considered negligent if, after having provided permission to erect bollards
or other protective devices on the nature strip, no checks were made to ensure that the bollards complied or were maintained to council’s satisfaction.
Attachment 2
Page 3 of 3
Although the Act prescribes that the resident is required to obtain an insurance policy that would indemnify the local government against any claim for damages that may arise in or out of its construction, maintenance or use, this may not be watertight if challenged and may be viewed as an attempt to modify responsibilities in terms of Common Law.
The Local Government Insurance Services WA state:
“As owners of the nature strip (verge), the City in most instances would carry the primary ‘Duty of Care’ which requires Council to take ‘reasonable care’ to avoid acts or omissions that could cause loss, damage and/or injury to another; a third party.”
Legal advice from Woodhouse Legal
The advice received substantiates previous advice that the City has a duty of care with respect to roads, nature strip and nature strip treatments. It further states that should the City have an indemnification clause incorporated into a local law, it would be unwise for the City to rely on such a clause.
The City’s Local Government and Public Property Local Law 1999, Section 50 (a) states:
(a) Indemnify the local government against all or any damage or injury caused to any person or thing including any thoroughfare, pavement, footpath or crossover or any pipe or cable and shall make good at such owner’s or occupier’s expense all such damage cause.”
The legal advice refers to a report to Parliament from the Joint Committee on Delegated Legislation regarding adverse clauses in local laws concerning indemnity for nature strip treatments. The document refers to a construction on a nature strip as opposed to nature strip (verge) treatments such as lawns, gardens or paving, and makes a distinction between the two as they relate to local laws and legislation. As the City’s local law relates only to lawns, gardens or paving, these are not considered constructions and should therefore not be privy to an indemnity clause. The Regulations however allows for an indemnity clause through a policy taken out by the owner on anything “constructed on a nature strip.”
Extract from the sixth report to Parliament: - “In the Committee’s opinion, the general legislative making power in section 3.5 (1) of the Local Government Act 1995 is insufficient to authorise the making of a local law that abrogates the fundamental right to sue a local authority for a cause of action recognised by the common law or statute.
Advice from Department of Local Government and Regional Development
“It is the local government’s responsibility to ensure that standards of safety exist to protect users of the street reserve from harm. The standard of care to be exercised in this context is the standard of care to be expected of a reasonable person which may vary according to circumstances”.
The Department has additionally advised that it is not aware of any local law that provides specifically for the construction of bollards or other protective devices.
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S17/0211
File Name: AA Community Funding Allocations October 2009.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: PA to Director Community Development
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 2
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider applications from community groups requesting funding through the City’s October 2009 Community Funding round for an upcoming specified project, activity or event.
Background
There are two funding rounds per financial year, in March and October. This funding round represents the first for the 2009/2010 financial year. Assessment criteria and eligibility requirements are detailed in the City’s Community Funding Policy.
Detail
There were 25 applications received by the closing of the October round of funding. Fifteen of these applications were Community Development and 10 were Event Sponsorship. The table below identifies the number of applications received from each Ward:
Ward |
Community Development |
Event Sponsorship |
Central |
5 |
1 |
Coastal |
4 |
2 |
North |
4 |
2 |
South |
1 |
3 |
Outside of CoW (but project/event is taking place within CoW) |
0 |
2 |
Outside of CoW (and project/event is taking place outside of CoW) |
1 |
0 |
|
15 |
10 |
A complete compilation of applications and their relevant attachments have been made available in the Elected Members reading room.
Comment
The applications were stringently assessed against the Community Funding Policy and the Working Group’s recommendations to Council, if approved, are that the following applicants provide additional information in support of their application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development, before receiving funding. Those being: Ishar Multicultural Women’s Health Centre, Brighton Eisteddfod, Carramar & Tapping Residents Association, Wanneroo Senior High School P&C, Children in Action Inc. & Yanchep Two Rocks RSL.
With regards to the application by Aqua Attack Swimming Club for three diving blocks it was suggested that a report be prepared for Council seeking support to fund this request as soon as possible being a City facility.
It was also noted, due to the number of applications received, not all applications could be supported this round, and to encourage those who miss out to submit an application to the next round of funding ensuring they fully address the criteria before submitting applications.
A summary of each application is detailed in Attachment 1 & 2.
The Working Group also requested a sum on $12,000 be set aside to support Australia Day events in Yanchep, Wanneroo and Koondoola.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Community Funding Program is consistent with the City’s Strategy Plan 2006-2021 outcome objectives:
“Social - 2.3. Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other; and
Governance - 4.1 Improve strategic partnerships”.
Policy Implications
The Working Group is recommending additional information be provided by a number of applicants to satisfy the Community Funding Policy and to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development, prior to funding being made available.
Financial Implications
Of the 25 applications received 15 were Community Development (Attachment 1) applications requesting a total of $30,757.80 and 10 were Event Sponsorship (Attachment 2) requesting a total of $27,232.26. The total requested funds in this round of Community Funding to be considered by the Working Group amounts to $57,990.06.
The October Community Funding round is funded through the 2009/10 adopted budget for Community Funding and Donations account 717633-1205-316 which is $70,408.
There is a further round of community funding and hallmark events in March 2010. It is clear that not all of these requests can be funded.
Annual Community Funding Budget 2009/2010 |
$70,408.00 |
Total recommendations by Working Group in accordance with policy |
$26,749.86 |
Recommended to set aside for Australia Day Breakfast |
$12,000.00 |
Balance |
$31,658.14 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That the Community Funding Working Group recommend that Council:-
1. NOTES the Council resolution to CD01-11/09 (17 November 2009) for a donation to the Girrawheen Senior High School to the value of $2,370.00;
2. NOT APPROVE $2,160 to Patricia Giles Centre Inc. via Community Development funding for the Patricia Giles Centre Self Defence and Yoga for women activities from February to March 2010;
3. APPROVE $1,697.85 to Quinns Rocks Fishing Club Inc. via Community Development funding for the waiver of fees for weekly activities from 1 June 2009 to 31 July 2010;
4. NOT APPROVE $1,800.20 to Ye Olde Dogs Rugby Club via Community Development funding for purchase of playing tops;
5. NOT APPROVE $4,500 to Wanneroo Golf Club via Community Development funding for 40th Anniversary activities from October 2009 to August 2010;
6. NOT APPROVE $2,000 to Downstairs Gallery Suncity Artists Association for Introduction to Art activities from January 2010 to June 2010;
7. APPROVE $495.75 to Atlantis Productions Inc. via Community Development funding for Tapping the Talent and Bridging the Gap activities from 29 November 2009 to 30 March 2010;
8. APPROVE $2,500 to City of Wanneroo/ Roadwise Working Group via Community Development funding for the Driver Reviver Caravan subject to project completion by 30 June 2010 and support the Roadwise Working Group in an application for Lotterywest funding;
9. APPROVE $1,450 Ishar Multicultural Women’s Health Centre via Community Development funding for the Community Kitchen project from 3 February 2010 to 3 February 2011 on the condition that additional information is provided in support of the application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development before funding is received;
10. APPROVE $200 to Wanneroo Playgroup via Community Development funding for Wall Painting project from January 2010 to March 2010;
11. NOT APPROVE $3,600 to Aqua Attack Swimming Club for three diving block at Aquamotion and REQUESTS a report to Council seeking support to fund this request as soon as possible being a City facility;
12. APPROVE $250 to Mindarie & Districts Sea Sports Club Inc. via Community Development funding towards purchasing of a printer;
13. APPROVE $2,000 to Northern Suburbs Community Legal Centre Inc. via Community Development funding for the Community Education program from 11 February 2010 to 17 June 2010;
14. NOT APPROVE $1,000 to Clarkson Primary School via Community Development funding for Ceramic Tile Mural project from 20 April 2010 to 2 July 2010;
15. APPROVE $400 to Quinns Rocks Cricket Club Inc. via Community Development funding for Stingray Day activities on 7 March 2010;
16. APPROVE $825 to Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club via Community Development funding for Club Equipment;
17. APPROVE $1,500 to Badminton Association of WA via Event Sponsorship for City of Wanneroo Badminton Championships from 1 April 2010 to 11 April 2010;
18. APPROVE $500 to Brighton Eisteddfod via Event Sponsorship for Brighton Eisteddfod on 21 November 2009 on the condition that additional information is provided in support of the application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development before funding is received;
19. NOT APPROVE $375 to Quinns Rocks Cricket Club Inc. via Event Sponsorship for Junior Cricket and Christmas Function on 20 December 2009;
20. APPROVE $3,105.26 to Balga Job Link Inc. via Event Sponsorship for the Girra Mirra Harmony Week Festival for 18 and 19 March 2010;
21. APPROVE $3,216 to Carramar and Tapping Residents’ Association for a Community Expo on 14 March 2010;
22. APPROVE $1,500 to Whitford Church via Event Sponsorship for Easter Eggastravaganza on 3 April 2010;
23. APPROVE $2,500 to Wanneroo Senior High School P & C via Event Sponsorship for the Medieval-Renaissance Fayre on 5 December 2009 on the condition that additional information is provided in support of the application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development before funding is received;
24. APPROVE $1,500 to Children in Action Inc. via Event Sponsorship for the 14th Annual Easter Camp from 2 April 2010 to 7 April 2010 on the condition that additional information is provided in support of the application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development before funding is received;
25. APPROVE $740 to Yanchep Two Rocks RSL Sub Branch for Battle for Australia Day and Merchant Navy Day on 1 & 3 September 2010 on the condition that additional information is provided in support of the application to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development before funding is received; and
26. SET ASIDE a maximum of $12,000 for Australia Day celebrations and invite submissions from Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association, Wanneroo Scouts and Girradoola Lions subject to paperwork being to the satisfaction of the Director Community Development.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 6 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 7 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 8 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 9 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 10 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 11 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 12 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 13 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 14 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 15 of 15
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment
- Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 4 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 5 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 6 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 7 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 8 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 9 of 10
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 10 of 10
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S07/0321V01
File Name: CA Proposed Replacement of Plant 96031 Mitsubishi Rosa 21 24 Seater Bus .doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Hope Ledesma
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment/s Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider plant replacement options for asset 96031 (Mitsubishi 21-24 seater bus) to maximise client and administrative customer service and operational efficiencies within the City’s Centre Based Day Care Programs.
Background
In August 2009, Program Services received advice from the Coordinator of Fleet Services that WN32098 (Plant 96031) is included in the 2009/2010 New Capital Purchases. Plant 96031 (18 seater bus plus a hoist) is primarily used to provide transport service for Alexander Heights Centre Based Day Care, which has an average of 97 clients per week.
Alexander Heights Centre Based Day Care is part of the City’s Home and Community Care (HACC) Program, which the City delivers in collaboration with the State and Federal funding bodies. The aim of HACC is to assist individuals and their carers by providing a range of support services which promote community independence, enhances quality of life in the home, and helps to prevent premature entry into hostel or nursing home accommodation. Currently, the City’s HACC program is providing support to over 750 eligible clients.
In 2008/2009, the Department of Health granted the City $276,230 to provide transport service to eligible HACC clients who are attending the City’s Centre Based Day Care (CBDC) centres, as well as those taking part in the group shopping service. The funding is estimated to increase to $287,849 in the current financial year, which is intended to cover the costs of salaries of staff (drivers and bus aides), honorariums for volunteers, and the overall maintenance and operation of relevant vehicles.
The City is currently maintaining a number of motor vehicles specifically used for HACC services. These vehicles were initially purchased as a result of non-recurrent funding from the Department of Health and/or possibly from other external funding sources such as Lotterywest.
Based on the current CBDC operation, there are 4 buses providing transport service to 11 Centre Based Day Care (CBDC) programs that operate at Alexander Heights, Wanneroo, Quinns Rocks, Merriwa and Girrawheen. The service includes picking up and returning clients from their homes to the centres and/or transporting clients during outings. These buses are as follows: -
· WN32098 (Plant No. 96031) - Mitsubishi Rosa – 18-Seater with a wheelchair lift
· WN32642 (Plant No. 96063) - Mitsubishi Rosa – 18-Seater with a wheelchair lift
· WN32925 (Plant No. 95330) - Toyota Hi Ace Commuter Bus – 12-Seater
· WN32519 (Plant No. 95377) - Toyota Hi Ace Commuter Bus – 12-Seater
In terms of the licences required to operate the abovementioned vehicles, according to the Department of Transport of Western Australia: -
· A motor vehicle with a gross vehicle mass not great than 4.5 tonnes and constructed or equipped to seat no more than 12 adults (including the driver) can be operated by a driver with a C class driver’s licence.
· A motor vehicle that seats more than 12 adults (including the driver) and has a gross vehicle mass greater than 4.5tonnes but not greater than 8 tonnes requires a driver with LR class licence.
· A motor vehicle that has 2 axles and a gross vehicle mass greater than 8 tonnes requires a driver with MR class licence.
Detail
Historically, the City’s HACC program had a number of CBDC staff that were qualified to drive light rigid vehicles such as Plant 96031. However, due to a number of factors (e.g. resignations, establishment of other CBDC centres, and particularly labour shortage during recent times), Alexander Heights CBDC has been left with only 1 regular staff with a LR class driver’s licence. In spite of the City’s endeavour to promote and encourage staff to obtain the LR class licence, the number has not increased resulting in a constant challenge to find suitable replacement staff when the only qualified driver takes time off work due to sickness, holiday, etc.
In addition to the above, the CBDC program is also faced with a limited supply of vehicles as a result of the City’s continuing growth and increasing service demand from the community. In spite of the recent funding received from the Department of Health to purchase one additional bus (Plant 95330) for the City’s CBDC program, there are still only 2 buses providing transport service to supposedly 7 programs operating from Alexander Heights, Wanneroo and Girrawheen Centre Based Day Care centres.
The shortage of CBDC buses results in the City’s HACC program relying on the Community Transport Service (CTS) to supplement the vehicle requirements, hence, impacting on the availability of CTS vehicles for other community use. Based on the first quarter of the current financial year, CBDC used the CTS 7-seater bus (with a hoist) 61 times out of 66 working days (Monday to Friday). The costs for using this bus, however, are being charged to the Centre Based Day Care by the Community Transport Service at full recovery rate.
Consultation
A business case was submitted to the Fleet Steering Committee in October 2009 in relation to this matter and the recommendation contained therein was supported by the Executive Management Team at its meeting on 28 October 2009.
Comment
In view of the above circumstances, the City’s HACC program is recommending the replacement of Plant 96031 with 2 smaller buses (up to 12-seater) that can be operated by a driver with a C class driver’s licence. At least one of the two buses is to be fitted with a hoist to accommodate wheelchair ambulated clients.
The recommendation is based on the following reasons: -
· The majority, if not all, of the current CBDC staff have C class driver’s licences which is a requirement under their current position descriptions. This provides a bigger pool of drivers capable of driving the proposed replacement vehicles.
· Increased customer service and administrative efficiencies resulting from running two smaller buses.
· Improved client comfort (less time spent on buses in transit routes).
· Provides the opportunity to manage the increasing demand for vehicles for CBDC programs. Also increases the pool of buses for broader use.
· The capacity for the increased operational expenses to be alleviated through funding support for the program.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of these services is consistent with the City of Wanneroo’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcomes and objectives:-
“Social – Healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities.
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options.
2.5 Improve transport options and connections.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Tabled below are the possible options and the associated costs for the replacement of Plant 96031.
Expense Type |
First Option: Mitsubishi Rosa (21-24 Seater) |
Second Option: 2 x Toyota (11-14 Seater) |
Purchase Cost (Capital) |
$125,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
Operating Costs |
$25,601.40 |
$51,202.80 |
Based on the information presented above, it is less expensive to purchase two smaller buses in lieu of a 24-seater bus (approximately $25,000) but the operating costs for the second option is double the first option (an increase of approximately $25,000 per annum).
In the first year of operation, the increase in operating costs will be covered by the savings made from the initial capital purchase costs. Thereafter, this increase in operating costs is able to be accommodated from funding levels - based on the draft 2008/2009 acquittal, the HACC transport service shows a surplus of $111,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council: -
1. APPROVES the replacement of Plant 96031 with 2 smaller buses (up to 12-seater) that can be operated by a driver with a C class driver’s licence.
2. NOTES the following budget variations for the purchase and operation of 2 smaller buses (up to 12-seater) in lieu of 1 big bus (21-24 seater).
Capital:
Project/Account No |
From |
To |
Description |
PR1659 |
$125,000 |
$100,000 |
2 Centre Based Day Care Buses (up to 12 seater each) |
Operating:
Project/Account No |
From |
To |
Description |
717218-1173-456 (WO36673) |
$25,601.40 |
$51,202.80 |
Operating costs to maintain 2 Centre Based Day Care Buses (up to 12 seater each) |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: S13/0002V01
File Name: AC Warrant of Payments For the Period to 31 October 2009.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Juanita Lee
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of October 2009, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in October 2009 -
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID Less Cancelled Cheques Jounals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
75678 - 76004 1008 - 1020
|
$2,645,733.79 $9,387,334.22 $12,033,068.01 ($1,209.70) $399.30 ($1,012,006.62) $11,020,250.99 |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Direct Payments – Advance Recoup Direct Payments – Bank Fees Direct Payments – Credit Cards Direct Payments Total Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$11,020,250.99 $45,497.68 $17,030.38 $11,082,779.05 $2,260,439.99 $13,343,219.04 |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 8 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$238.28 $238.27 $238.27 $238.28 $670.25 $86,791.26 $923,592.01 $1,012,006.62 |
At the close of October 2009 outstanding creditors amounted to $17,933.31.
Consultation
Nil.
Comment
The list of accounts paid by cheque and electronic transfer in October 2009 and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of October 2009 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments for the month of October 2009, as summarised below:-
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID Less Cancelled Cheques Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
75678 - 76004 1008 - 1020
|
$2,645,733.79 $9,387,334.22 $12,033,068.01 ($1,209.70) $399.30 ($1,012,006.62) $11,020,250.99 |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Direct Payments – Advance Recoup Direct Payments – Bank Fees Direct Payments – Credit Cards Direct Payments Total Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$11,020,250.99 $45,497.68 $17,030.38 $11,082,779.05 $2,260,439.99 $13,343,219.04 |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – OCTOBER 2009 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 8 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$238.28 $238.27 $238.27 $238.28 $670.25 $86,791.26 $923,592.01 $1,012,006.62 |
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS OCTOBER 2009 |
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
00075678 |
01/10/2009 |
2RM Installations |
$616.00 |
|
|
Supply And Install Electric Chainhead in Child Care Centre |
|
00075679 |
01/10/2009 |
Dept of Environment And Conservations |
$200.00 |
|
|
Clearing Permit For Hawkins Road Jandabup |
|
00075680 |
01/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$59.05 |
|
|
Legal Fees - To Reserve General Procedure Claimes Assessment No. 2425235 - 65 Wyatt Road Hocking |
|
00075681 |
06/10/2009 |
Australian Anglo-Burmese Society In |
$590.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075682 |
06/10/2009 |
Karen Baptist Fellowship |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075683 |
06/10/2009 |
Sue Sincken |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075684 |
06/10/2009 |
Pernilla Hjelte-Lachs |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075685 |
06/10/2009 |
Department For Communities |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075686 |
06/10/2009 |
Sharon Naughton |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075687 |
06/10/2009 |
Naomi Ellen Merrick |
$146.08 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 4 Deepwater, A/N 2287247, Overpaid |
|
00075688 |
06/10/2009 |
Carine Nominees Pty Ltd |
$1,415.01 |
|
|
Rate Refund - Asses. 2558407 - Paid Twice Property Sold 11 Windjammer Parkway |
|
00075689 |
06/10/2009 |
Donna Marie Brunini |
$400.48 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 99 Kilkee, A/N 2513006, Overpaid |
|
00075690 |
06/10/2009 |
Patricia June Wyatt |
$530.12 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 14 Gould, A/N 2124218, Overpaid |
|
00075691 |
06/10/2009 |
Jon William Kelly |
$859.14 |
|
|
Refund Overpayment Of Rates |
|
00075692 |
06/10/2009 |
Norma Ida Radich |
$3,734.02 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 93 Safari Place, A/N 2000335, Overpaid |
|
00075693 |
06/10/2009 |
Jaguars Softball Club |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075694 |
06/10/2009 |
Ziani Mohd-Shaharuddin |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075695 |
06/10/2009 |
Ryan Haast |
$590.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075696 |
06/10/2009 |
Laura Allgood |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075697 |
06/10/2009 |
Brandi Burnham |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075698 |
06/10/2009 |
Eddie Rogers |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075699 |
06/10/2009 |
S Kerr |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075700 |
06/10/2009 |
Quinns Districts Junior Football Club |
$110.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075701 |
06/10/2009 |
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club |
$55.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075702 |
06/10/2009 |
Louise Parker |
$11.50 |
|
|
Refund Of Swimming Lesson For Kayla-Kay Corpus-Parker |
|
00075703 |
06/10/2009 |
T Maile & K Moon |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075704 |
06/10/2009 |
W Whaley |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075705 |
06/10/2009 |
B Gori |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075706 |
06/10/2009 |
EB Kerse & EL Kerse |
$268.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075707 |
06/10/2009 |
PD Labis |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075708 |
06/10/2009 |
P Barrot |
$220.00 |
|
|
Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00075709 |
06/10/2009 |
M McGougan |
$220.00 |
|
|
Small Business Smart Business Voucher |
|
00075710 |
06/10/2009 |
G Rudrum |
$11.50 |
|
|
Swim Lesson Cancelled For Amba Rudrum |
|
00075711 |
06/10/2009 |
A Ferguson |
$111.60 |
|
|
Refund For Missed Swimming Lesson For Hayden, Jake And Emily Ferguson |
|
00075712 |
06/10/2009 |
Naval Assoc Of Australia/North |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Contribution Of $1,000 Toward The Navy Day Service To Be Held On 04/10/09 And $1,000 Towards The Remembrance Day Service To Be Held On 11/11/09 |
|
00075713 |
06/10/2009 |
Michele Brown |
$59.40 |
|
|
Refund Of Centres Admission Fees Due To Cancelled Vacswim Lessons |
|
00075714 |
06/10/2009 |
Mark Genovese |
$638.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00075715 |
06/10/2009 |
T Langlands |
$17.60 |
|
|
Refund Of Park Hire Fees For Queenscliff Park - Booking Cancelled |
|
00075716 |
06/10/2009 |
J Rawlinson |
$25.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund Death Of Dog |
|
00075717 |
06/10/2009 |
High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Riley Temple To Attend 2009 Australian Trampoline Championships In Adelaide 26/09-01/10/09 |
|
00075718 |
06/10/2009 |
WA Schools Rugby Union |
$200.00 |
|
|
$200 For The Participation Of Curtis Rona In The Rugby Schools Boys National Tournament In June 2009 |
|
00075719 |
06/10/2009 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$78.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075720 |
06/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$246.30 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075721 |
06/10/2009 |
Alinta Gas |
$11.30 |
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00075722 |
06/10/2009 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$193.20 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075723 |
06/10/2009 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$105.05 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075724 |
06/10/2009 |
Alan Green |
$30.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
00075725 |
06/10/2009 |
Michael Hayes |
$40.00 |
|
|
Key Holder - Cockman House |
|
00075726 |
06/10/2009 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$137.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075727 |
06/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$54.35 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075728 |
06/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00075729 |
06/10/2009 |
Water Corporation |
$863.10 |
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
00075730 |
06/10/2009 |
City Of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,796.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00075731 |
06/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00075732 |
06/10/2009 |
Synergy |
$38,276.80 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
00075733 |
06/10/2009 |
Gordon Sadler |
$200.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
00075734 |
06/10/2009 |
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd |
$990.67 |
|
|
Settlement Of Third Party Claim - Insurance Services |
|
00075735 |
06/10/2009 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$63.85 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075736 |
06/10/2009 |
Susan Morrissey |
$105.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights ADC |
|
00075737 |
06/10/2009 |
Ms M A Gilchrist |
$50.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Community Bus Aide |
|
00075738 |
06/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$45.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075739 |
06/10/2009 |
Robert & Norma Bright |
$6,220.00 |
|
|
Construct Rear Ramp At The Old Wanneroo Primary School |
|
00075740 |
08/10/2009 |
William J Udall |
$550.00 |
|
|
Performance Fee On 8.10.09 - Capacity Building |
|
00075741 |
13/10/2009 |
Dorothy Evelyn Pritchard |
$407.84 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 16 Shelvock Crescent, A/N 2101265 Overpaid |
|
00075742 |
13/10/2009 |
Department of Housing & Works |
$205.56 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 14 Oligantha Elbow, A/N 2589774 Overpaid |
|
00075743 |
13/10/2009 |
Lake Joondalup Village Social Club |
$350.00 |
|
|
Donation For Fuel |
|
00075744 |
13/10/2009 |
Gymnastics Western Australia |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Jake Wegener To Attend 09 Australian Trampoline Championships - Adelaide - 27/09-01/10/09 |
|
00075745 |
13/10/2009 |
Gaelic Athletic Association of WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Alex Elisseou To Attend Australasian Gaelic Football & Hurling Championships 2009 - Melbourne 28/09-04/10/09 |
|
00075746 |
13/10/2009 |
WA School Sport |
$75.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Kurtis Mathews To Attend All Schools National Diving Championships - Perth 12-18/09/09 |
|
00075747 |
13/10/2009 |
Kingsway Junior Soccer Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
$600 To Kingsway Junior Soccer Club For The Participation Of M Nadalini, P Panagiotidis, L Hurley, G Nayna, Z Potter, J France, R Wright, I Sayed ($75 Each) In The International Soccer Tournament, Koto Kinabalu 7-11/10/09 |
|
00075748 |
13/10/2009 |
Greenwood Senior High School |
$600.00 |
|
|
$100 Each To T Blobin, B Colborne, N Glossop, S-J Budd, L Porter And K Ironmunger For Participation In The National Schools Cup - Volleyball Championships 6-13/12/09 |
|
00075749 |
13/10/2009 |
M & T Heeley |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075750 |
13/10/2009 |
S Rawi |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075751 |
13/10/2009 |
GL Williamson |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075752 |
13/10/2009 |
R Drury |
$127.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00075753 |
13/10/2009 |
R Marlam |
$261.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00075754 |
13/10/2009 |
S Viner |
$20.00 |
|
|
Dog Refund - Sterilisation |
|
00075755 |
13/10/2009 |
Seatrees Estate Residents Group |
$847.00 |
|
|
$847 Toward The Purchase Of Two Information Boards For Seatrees Estate Residents Group |
|
00075756 |
13/10/2009 |
Martin Dickhart & Assoc |
$150.00 |
|
|
1 X Rate Payer Financial Assistance |
|
00075757 |
13/10/2009 |
Axion Conveyancing |
$179.67 |
|
|
Rates Refund , 22 Cyandra Loop, A/N 2557441,Overpd |
|
00075758 |
13/10/2009 |
Rodney Servaas |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075759 |
13/10/2009 |
Abhijat Sinha |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075760 |
13/10/2009 |
Christine Turner |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075761 |
13/10/2009 |
Blossom Rodie |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075762 |
13/10/2009 |
Community Vision |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075763 |
13/10/2009 |
John & Garrielle Udy |
$330.00 |
|
|
1 X Rate Payer Financial Assistance |
|
00075764 |
13/10/2009 |
Brenda Hunter |
$57.00 |
|
|
Dog Refund - Sterilisation |
|
00075765 |
13/10/2009 |
Jean Hansen |
$10.00 |
|
|
Refund - Culture Tour 14/10/09 |
|
00075766 |
13/10/2009 |
Ritmico Gymnastics |
$200.00 |
|
|
$200 For The Participation Of Breanna Wegener In The National Gymnastics Championships Held In Brisbane July 09 |
|
00075767 |
13/10/2009 |
Fiesta Foods |
$127.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00075768 |
13/10/2009 |
Janice Mills |
$18.00 |
|
|
Refund Multi-Sport North Zone - 7 October 2009 |
|
00075769 |
13/10/2009 |
Katrina Higgins |
$18.00 |
|
|
Refund Multi-Sport North Zone - 7 October 2009 |
|
00075770 |
13/10/2009 |
KG & DF Beretta |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075771 |
13/10/2009 |
S & K Patel |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075772 |
13/10/2009 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$13.20 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075773 |
13/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$242.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075774 |
13/10/2009 |
Alinta Gas |
$719.20 |
|
|
2 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $339.00 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00075775 |
13/10/2009 |
Amp Flexible Lifetime Super Fund |
$5,432.66 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075776 |
13/10/2009 |
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash |
$90.90 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075777 |
13/10/2009 |
Mary Colvin |
$85.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights |
|
00075778 |
13/10/2009 |
Landgate |
$31.50 |
|
|
Minimum Charge - Rating Services |
|
00075779 |
13/10/2009 |
Mr Stephen Freeborn |
$260.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Support Work |
|
00075780 |
13/10/2009 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$37.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075781 |
13/10/2009 |
Mr Rod Hannan |
$50.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Driving Community Shoppers Bus |
|
00075782 |
13/10/2009 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$300.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075783 |
13/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$62.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075784 |
13/10/2009 |
Landgate |
$8,250.45 |
|
|
GRV INT Valuations - Rating Services |
|
|
|
Minimum Charge - Rating Services |
|
|
|
Valuations For Rating Services 19.09.09-02.10.09 |
|
00075785 |
13/10/2009 |
Water Corporation |
$467.50 |
|
|
1 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $350.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - 7 Trotman Circle Yanchep -12/08/09 |
|
00075786 |
13/10/2009 |
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash |
$218.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075787 |
13/10/2009 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Library Petty Cash |
$55.95 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075788 |
13/10/2009 |
Zurich Client Service |
$1,234.31 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075789 |
13/10/2009 |
Synergy |
$48,834.35 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
2 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $278.05 |
|
00075790 |
13/10/2009 |
Telstra |
$8,200.01 |
|
|
1 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $191.87 |
|
|
|
Bigpond/Phone Charges For IT |
|
00075791 |
13/10/2009 |
Laurie Bracken |
$130.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
00075792 |
13/10/2009 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$18.20 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075793 |
13/10/2009 |
Communications & Events Petty Cash |
$156.90 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075794 |
13/10/2009 |
Western Power |
$210,056.99 |
|
|
Upgrade Lights - Hartman Dve - Projects |
|
00075795 |
13/10/2009 |
Navigator Applications Account |
$324.35 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075796 |
13/10/2009 |
HOSTPLUS Superannuation Fund |
$1,659.96 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075797 |
13/10/2009 |
WESTSCHEME |
$8,256.96 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075798 |
13/10/2009 |
MLC Nominees Pty Limited |
$1,258.52 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075799 |
13/10/2009 |
The Industry Superannuation Fund |
$640.91 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075800 |
13/10/2009 |
1OOF Portfolio Service Superannuation |
$721.53 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075801 |
13/10/2009 |
Integra Super |
$1,901.98 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075802 |
13/10/2009 |
Phyllis Bennison |
$60.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights |
|
00075803 |
13/10/2009 |
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund |
$257.44 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075804 |
13/10/2009 |
Christine Demiris |
$50.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights |
|
00075805 |
13/10/2009 |
MTAA Superannuation Fund |
$892.13 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075806 |
13/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$13.95 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075807 |
13/10/2009 |
AustralianSuper |
$3,249.28 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075808 |
13/10/2009 |
REST Superannuation |
$8,621.46 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075809 |
13/10/2009 |
Health Super Fund |
$301.27 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075810 |
13/10/2009 |
UniSuper Limited |
$819.45 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075811 |
13/10/2009 |
Hesta Super Fund |
$2,291.87 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075812 |
13/10/2009 |
Colonial First State FirstChoice |
$1,500.16 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075813 |
13/10/2009 |
Care Super |
$596.19 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075814 |
13/10/2009 |
Spectrum Super |
$1,049.04 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075815 |
13/10/2009 |
Media Super |
$984.50 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075816 |
13/10/2009 |
Trust Company Superannuation Service |
$742.63 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075817 |
13/10/2009 |
BT Super for Life |
$235.47 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075818 |
13/10/2009 |
Australian Ethical Retail |
$321.60 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075819 |
13/10/2009 |
Maureen Butler |
$75.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Alex Heights |
|
00075820 |
13/10/2009 |
Telstra Superannuation Scheme |
$1,649.74 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075821 |
13/10/2009 |
AMIST Super |
$361.96 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075822 |
13/10/2009 |
Valdor Superannuation Fund |
$481.95 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075823 |
13/10/2009 |
Symetry Lifetime Super |
$691.59 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075824 |
13/10/2009 |
Aquamotion Cafe |
$162.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075825 |
13/10/2009 |
Health Industry Plan (HIP) |
$197.86 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075826 |
13/10/2009 |
Vision Super Pty Ltd |
$714.13 |
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
00075827 |
13/10/2009 |
Ellen Smith |
$25.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights |
|
00075828 |
13/10/2009 |
Chubb Electronic Security |
$795.96 |
|
|
Security Services - Aquamotion |
|
00075829 |
13/10/2009 |
Dept For Planning & Infrastructure |
$71.50 |
|
|
Census Economic Analysis - Economic Development |
|
00075830 |
13/10/2009 |
Northern Districts Milk Supply |
$216.60 |
|
|
Supplies For Aquamotion Cafe |
|
00075831 |
13/10/2009 |
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$369.00 |
|
|
Landscape Products For Clarkson Parks |
|
00075832 |
13/10/2009 |
WACOSS |
$110.00 |
|
|
Conference - Emergency Relief 25-26/11/09 - Perth Town Hall - K Shubhra |
|
00075833 |
14/10/2009 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
00075834 |
14/10/2009 |
Cr Dorothy Newton |
$500.00 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
00075835 |
14/10/2009 |
Cr Colin Hughes |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
00075836 |
14/10/2009 |
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$416.33 |
|
|
Deductions Form Allowances Rates - Assessment 2139311 D Newton $83.33 Rates - Assessment 2003982 Mayor Kelly $200.00 Rates - Assessment 2113633 R Steffens $133.00 |
|
00075837 |
15/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$85.65 |
|
|
Legal Fees - General Procedure Legal Fees- Rating Services |
|
00075838 |
05/10/2009 |
Promark Promotions |
$17,737.50 |
|
|
Picnic Rugs - Marketing |
|
00075839 |
05/10/2009 |
Consolidated Broadcasting System WA |
$10,078.20 |
|
|
Provide Broadcast Of Wlcc Event On Saturday 24 October 2009 - Marketing |
|
00075840 |
13/10/2009 |
City of Wanneroo |
$100.00 |
|
|
Cash Advance For Funded Services For Entertainer For 1 Hours For Seniors Week - 19/10/09 |
|
00075841 |
16/10/2009 |
Printer Error |
|
00075842 |
16/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$59.05 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Rates Services |
|
00075843 |
20/10/2009 |
The Bead Company |
$274.11 |
|
|
Various Items For Program Services |
|
00075844 |
20/10/2009 |
Quinns Districts Junior Football Club |
$55.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075845 |
20/10/2009 |
Burmese Association |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075846 |
20/10/2009 |
Lynne Anderson |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075847 |
20/10/2009 |
Frances Matthews |
$10.00 |
|
|
Refund - Culture Tour 14/10/09 |
|
00075848 |
20/10/2009 |
High Flyers Trampoline |
$600.00 |
|
|
$600 To High Flyers Trampoline For Participation Of Oliver And Curtis Booth ($300 Each) At The World Age Trampoline Championships To Be Held In Russia 19-21/11/09 |
|
00075849 |
20/10/2009 |
Quinns Districts Junior Football Club |
$55.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075850 |
20/10/2009 |
Miluc Pty Ltd |
$94,733.10 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Overpaid Infrastructure Contribution |
|
00075851 |
20/10/2009 |
DJ Dickson |
$455.00 |
|
|
Membership Cancellation Due To Move Out Of The Area - Pro Rata Refund |
|
00075852 |
20/10/2009 |
Teresa Judith Sarah Wood |
$536.50 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Application Fees - Duplicated |
|
00075853 |
20/10/2009 |
HOMESWEST VACANT |
$751.04 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 37 Reseda Elbow, A/N 2260293, Overpaid |
|
00075854 |
20/10/2009 |
Lo-Anne Jenke |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075855 |
20/10/2009 |
Lisa Grant |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075856 |
20/10/2009 |
Alexander G Hanna |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075857 |
20/10/2009 |
City of Wanneroo |
$660.00 |
|
|
Cash Advance - B Stothard's Retirement |
|
|
|
Cash Float - WRC - M Hinman |
|
00075858 |
20/10/2009 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$48.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075859 |
20/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$321.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075860 |
20/10/2009 |
Alinta Gas |
$459.40 |
|
|
2 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $447.60 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00075861 |
20/10/2009 |
Australia Post |
$9,190.19 |
|
|
Postage Charges - Sep 09 Lodgements |
|
00075862 |
20/10/2009 |
Buckingham House Petty Cash |
$99.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075863 |
20/10/2009 |
Building & Construction Industry |
$110,105.75 |
|
|
Building And Construction Levy Collections 01/09-30/09/09 |
|
00075864 |
20/10/2009 |
Cockman House Petty Cash |
$48.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075865 |
20/10/2009 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$1,621.14 |
|
|
Travel Allowance |
|
00075866 |
20/10/2009 |
Landgate |
$514.55 |
|
|
Land Enquiries For The City |
|
00075867 |
20/10/2009 |
Fines Enforcement Registry |
$4,085.00 |
|
|
Lodgement Of 95 Infringement Records With Fines Enforcement Registry |
|
00075868 |
20/10/2009 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$55.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075869 |
20/10/2009 |
Hainsworth Youth Services Petty Cash |
$184.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075870 |
20/10/2009 |
Mr Evan Martin |
$227.50 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
00075871 |
20/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$28.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075872 |
20/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$50.95 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075873 |
20/10/2009 |
Water Corporation |
$5,439.30 |
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
00075874 |
20/10/2009 |
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,901.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00075875 |
20/10/2009 |
Synergy |
$12,120.55 |
|
|
Power Charges For The City |
|
|
|
2 x Rate Payer Financial Assistance $419.95 |
|
00075876 |
20/10/2009 |
Telstra |
$17,760.90 |
|
|
Bigpond Access For IT |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
00075877 |
20/10/2009 |
Mrs Jennifer Martin |
$200.20 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
00075878 |
20/10/2009 |
Ms D Hetherington |
$191.10 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
00075879 |
20/10/2009 |
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Claim Excess WN31915 |
|
|
|
Insurance Claim Excess 1CEH 763 |
|
00075880 |
20/10/2009 |
Cr Colin Hughes |
$484.38 |
|
|
Travel Allowance |
|
00075881 |
20/10/2009 |
Australia Post |
$12,999.57 |
|
|
Billpay Transaction Fee - Rates |
|
00075882 |
20/10/2009 |
Hainsworth Programme Development Petty Cash |
$148.30 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075883 |
20/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$180.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075884 |
20/10/2009 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$451.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075885 |
20/10/2009 |
Mr Barry O'Loughlin |
$100.10 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
00075886 |
21/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$2,760.15 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Property Seizure & Sale Order's Overdue Rates - Rates |
|
00075887 |
25/10/2009 |
179 Design |
$247.50 |
|
|
Advertising Design Work For City Business |
|
00075888 |
25/10/2009 |
1st Class Detail |
$110.00 |
|
|
Clean Seats & Interior Of Express Van WN32463 - Building Maintenance |
|
00075889 |
25/10/2009 |
Astro Synthetic Turf |
$2,116.40 |
|
|
Supply/Install Synthetic Turf At Alexander Heights Park - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00075890 |
25/10/2009 |
Australian Communications & Media |
$321.00 |
|
|
Licence Renewal Notice - It Microwave Link |
|
00075891 |
25/10/2009 |
Australian Institute of Company |
$6,050.00 |
|
|
Induction Seminars For New Councillors |
|
00075892 |
25/10/2009 |
Australian Teaching Aids |
$75.40 |
|
|
Various Items For WLCC |
|
00075893 |
25/10/2009 |
BGC Asphalt & Quarries |
$1,517.88 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet |
|
00075894 |
25/10/2009 |
Big W |
$1,029.11 |
|
|
Various Items - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Goods For Alexander Heights Cc |
|
00075895 |
25/10/2009 |
CFI |
$726.00 |
|
|
Powerfast For Engineering |
|
00075896 |
25/10/2009 |
Choice |
$156.00 |
|
|
Renewal Subscription To Choice Magazine - Girrawheen Library |
|
00075897 |
25/10/2009 |
City of Gosnells |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
Environmental Planning |
|
00075898 |
25/10/2009 |
Coastal Services |
$323.40 |
|
|
Building Maintenance - Civic Centre |
|
00075899 |
25/10/2009 |
Cobbler Plus |
$60.00 |
|
|
Boot Polishing For Fire Services |
|
00075900 |
25/10/2009 |
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,230.60 |
|
|
Dell Ultrasharp U2410 Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor - IT |
|
|
|
Flat Panels And Warranty - IT |
|
|
|
PC Purchase - IT |
|
00075901 |
25/10/2009 |
DENNYS Wm. HAYES & ASSOCIATES |
$6,720.00 |
|
|
Professional Fees - Survey Road Land At Hawkins Road Jandabup - Contracts & Property |
|
00075902 |
25/10/2009 |
Digital Education Services |
$326.80 |
|
|
Supply Books To Girrawheen Library |
|
00075903 |
25/10/2009 |
Edgewater Veterinary Hospital |
$149.00 |
|
|
Veterinary Costs - Euthanasia X 3 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Costs - Rangers |
|
00075904 |
25/10/2009 |
Ever Technology |
$239.00 |
|
|
Full Set Of CD-Roms From The 2009 ACSA Conference - Program Services |
|
00075905 |
25/10/2009 |
FOO HUA Chinese Restaurant |
$669.00 |
|
|
Catering - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Catering - Madeley Fire - Fire Services |
|
00075906 |
25/10/2009 |
Glyn Parry |
$880.00 |
|
|
Childrens Book Week - Library Services |
|
00075907 |
25/10/2009 |
Great Southern Sands & Landscaping |
$47,639.90 |
|
|
Greenwaste Shredding Services - WRC |
|
00075908 |
25/10/2009 |
Hungry Jacks Wanneroo |
$68.75 |
|
|
Catering - Lunch - Fire Services |
|
00075909 |
25/10/2009 |
JB Precise Engineering |
$418.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
00075910 |
25/10/2009 |
Joan Roberson |
$880.00 |
|
|
Art Lessons For Community Art |
|
00075911 |
25/10/2009 |
Keysbrook Holdings Pty Ltd |
$198.00 |
|
|
Dry Cleaning - Fire Uniforms - Fire Services |
|
00075912 |
25/10/2009 |
KFC - Head Office |
$194.70 |
|
|
Catering - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Catering For Quinns Station - Fire Services |
|
00075913 |
25/10/2009 |
Kite Kinetics |
$500.00 |
|
|
Entertainment - Aquamotion Opening |
|
00075914 |
25/10/2009 |
Northern Districts Milk Supply |
$112.20 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
00075915 |
25/10/2009 |
KELLY MARIE O'BRIEN |
$276.93 |
|
|
Art Workshop Materials Reimbursements - Program Services |
|
00075916 |
25/10/2009 |
Ozscot Nurseries |
$6,763.68 |
|
|
Plants For Parks Maintenance |
|
00075917 |
25/10/2009 |
Robert & Norma Bright |
$165.00 |
|
|
Repair Brick Header - Gumblossom C/Ctr |
|
00075918 |
25/10/2009 |
Specialised Security Shredding |
$97.53 |
|
|
Shredding Services - Information & Business Improvements |
|
00075919 |
25/10/2009 |
State Library of WA |
$20,686.60 |
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges |
|
00075920 |
25/10/2009 |
Tai Chi For Health |
$50.00 |
|
|
Tai Chi For Arthritis Demonstration - Program Services |
|
00075921 |
25/10/2009 |
The Tube Nursery |
$3,346.00 |
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
00075922 |
25/10/2009 |
Tracey Gibbs |
$500.00 |
|
|
Public Appearance - Childrens Book Week |
|
00075923 |
25/10/2009 |
WA Limestone Company |
$117,730.82 |
|
|
Various Items For Engineering And Parks |
|
00075924 |
25/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Pizza |
$447.00 |
|
|
Catering - Carabooda Fire - Fire Services |
|
00075925 |
25/10/2009 |
Youthlink |
$55.00 |
|
|
Seminar - Working With Young People With Same Sex Attractions And Gender Diversity 25/11/09 C Gibson |
|
00075926 |
22/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$4,222.30 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Property Seizure & Sale Orders Overdue Rates |
|
00075927 |
02/10/2009 |
Australia Post |
$6,489.55 |
|
|
Postage Charges - September 2009 |
|
00075928 |
23/10/2009 |
Henley Saab |
$42,979.20 |
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Diesel Vector Sedan $42,979.20 - Fleet Services |
|
00075929 |
23/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$67.95 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Rating Services |
|
00075930 |
23/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00075931 |
23/10/2009 |
Shon Concrete |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075932 |
28/10/2009 |
Lisa Ravenscroft |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075933 |
28/10/2009 |
Julie Hale |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075934 |
28/10/2009 |
Gina Antich |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075935 |
28/10/2009 |
HOMESWEST |
$947.46 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 18 Jingana Road, A/N 2590996 Overpaid |
|
00075936 |
28/10/2009 |
NORMAN LESLIE BYASS & BEVERLEY MAY |
$655.39 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 10 Monaro Way, A/N 2373658, Overpaid |
|
00075937 |
28/10/2009 |
Brandi Burnham |
$38.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Hire Fee |
|
00075938 |
28/10/2009 |
Pat Giles Centre |
$50.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075939 |
28/10/2009 |
Jan Ogden |
$19.50 |
|
|
Refund - The Maze 19/06/09 And Refund - Yanchep Caving 11/11/09 |
|
00075940 |
28/10/2009 |
Chris Barugh |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075941 |
28/10/2009 |
Kuntesh Saha |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075942 |
28/10/2009 |
Anam Cara Centre |
$383.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075943 |
28/10/2009 |
Roshelle Adams |
$636.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075944 |
28/10/2009 |
Yanchep Districts Junior Football C |
$55.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075945 |
28/10/2009 |
Yanchep Districts Junior Football C |
$55.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00075946 |
28/10/2009 |
Barry J Simpson |
$564.49 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees |
|
00075947 |
28/10/2009 |
DB Mackie |
$250.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075948 |
28/10/2009 |
B Dennis & Z Doegolia |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075949 |
28/10/2009 |
Gerald James Tallo Abueva |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075950 |
28/10/2009 |
Ivan Norman Medard |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075951 |
28/10/2009 |
T Moher |
$15.40 |
|
|
Refund Of Vacswim Attendance Fee Due To Illness And Child Not Attending |
|
00075952 |
28/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00075953 |
28/10/2009 |
FRANK CONDO |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Reserve Land Resumed From Lot 18 (220) Mary Street |
|
00075954 |
28/10/2009 |
Luigi Condo |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Reserve Land Resumed From Lot 18 (220) Mary Street |
|
00075955 |
28/10/2009 |
Boogaard Nominees Pty Ltd for the |
$441,894.05 |
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Reserve Land Resumed From Lot 17 (232) Mary Street |
|
00075956 |
28/10/2009 |
SM Jones |
$57.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund Overpayment |
|
00075957 |
28/10/2009 |
Maria Albanese |
$57.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund Death Of Dog |
|
00075958 |
28/10/2009 |
SL Perrin & DS Wright |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075959 |
28/10/2009 |
M & M Wiltshire |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075960 |
28/10/2009 |
IS Samsudin & VC Muljadi |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075961 |
28/10/2009 |
A & E Sangwin |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075962 |
28/10/2009 |
D & A Lawrance |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075963 |
28/10/2009 |
MR & PS Cavanagh |
$300.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00075964 |
28/10/2009 |
Valerie Castlehow |
$10.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund Sterilisation - Error Made At Library |
|
00075965 |
28/10/2009 |
Carol Smith |
$50.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund Sterilisation |
|
00075966 |
28/10/2009 |
Kirsty De Bomford |
$59.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00075967 |
28/10/2009 |
DARREN SCOTT BOOTH |
$1,085.25 |
|
|
Rates Refund, 67 Vincent Rd, A/N 2421598, Overpaid |
|
00075968 |
28/10/2009 |
Sudirman Saipi & Muslimah Saipi |
$20.68 |
|
|
Rates Refund,8 Sherwin,A/N 2414874,Overpaid |
|
00075969 |
28/10/2009 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$51.45 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075970 |
28/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$346.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075971 |
28/10/2009 |
Cabcharge |
$803.82 |
|
|
Taxi Charges - Various Departments |
|
00075972 |
28/10/2009 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$350.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075973 |
28/10/2009 |
Crosbie & Duncan Golf |
$28,794.16 |
|
|
Commission On Fees Collected Sept 09 - Carramar Golf Course |
|
00075974 |
28/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$66.65 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Reservice Of General Procedure Claim - Rates |
|
00075975 |
28/10/2009 |
LGIS Liability |
$203,148.00 |
|
|
Insurance - 30/06/09-30/06/10 |
|
00075976 |
28/10/2009 |
Cr Dorothy Newton |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
00075977 |
28/10/2009 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$630.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075978 |
28/10/2009 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$96.50 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075979 |
28/10/2009 |
Landgate |
$9,371.82 |
|
|
Grv Int Vals - Rating Services |
|
00075980 |
28/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$51.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075981 |
28/10/2009 |
Water Corporation |
$1,212.47 |
|
|
Road/Footpath Reinstatement - Bayport Cct Mindarie |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
00075982 |
28/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00075983 |
28/10/2009 |
Synergy |
$8,103.70 |
|
|
Power Charges For The City |
|
00075984 |
28/10/2009 |
Telstra |
$3,197.21 |
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
00075985 |
28/10/2009 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$49.95 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075986 |
28/10/2009 |
Dept For Planning And Infrastructure |
$828.80 |
|
|
Search For Owner Ship - Rangers |
|
00075987 |
28/10/2009 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$91.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075988 |
28/10/2009 |
Aquamotion - Aerobic & Creche Cash |
$800.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash Increase From $1200 To $2000 |
|
00075989 |
28/10/2009 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$321.10 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075990 |
28/10/2009 |
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash |
$190.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00075991 |
28/10/2009 |
Dept of Regional Development and Land |
$550.00 |
|
|
Lease Rent For 6 Months For Yanchep Lagoon Kiosk 01/07/09-31/12/09 |
|
00075992 |
28/10/2009 |
American Express |
$411.34 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Michael Penson For Membership Subscription To CIMA2010 |
|
00075993 |
28/10/2009 |
WA Revenue Recovery Team |
$5.70 |
|
|
Unpaid/Underpaid Mail - Approvals |
|
00075994 |
28/10/2009 |
Advanced Spatial Technologies |
$22,451.00 |
|
|
Map Network Licences - IT |
|
00075995 |
28/10/2009 |
Cobey Industries |
$75,364.30 |
|
|
Progress Claim 14 - Kingsway Sporting Complex Redevelopment Stage 2 |
|
00075996 |
28/10/2009 |
Integrated Group Ltd |
$36,857.75 |
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
00075997 |
28/10/2009 |
Mindarie Regional Council |
$187,712.29 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Loan Reimbursement - 11 RRF Land Purchase - Finance |
|
00075998 |
28/10/2009 |
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$15,679.42 |
|
|
Diesel Fuel For Fleet Services |
|
00075999 |
28/10/2009 |
Cancelled |
|
00076000 |
28/10/2009 |
Wangara Trailers, Outdoor & Boating |
$12,188.00 |
|
|
Refurbish Mower Transport Trailer - Fleet |
|
00076001 |
28/10/2009 |
Western Australian Planning Commissioner |
$782.00 |
|
|
Lot 16 Hawkins Road Jandabup Application Fee |
|
|
|
Lot 17 Hawkins Road Jandabup Application Fee |
|
00076002 |
28/10/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
$119.35 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Reservice Of General Procedure Claim - Rates |
|
00076003 |
29/10/2009 |
Umberto Condo |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Reserve Land Resumed From Lot 18 (220) Mary Street |
|
00076004 |
30/10/2009 |
Raewyn Carroll |
$1,575.00 |
|
|
Writers Talk - Childrens Bookweek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$2,645,733.79 |
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER LISTING |
|||
00001008 |
06/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Business Telephone Company |
$104.50 |
|
|
Battery Kit For Waste |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz |
$167.26 |
|
|
Plants - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Break West Pty Ltd |
$7,309.50 |
|
|
MRF - Hire Of Samsung |
|
|
|
Community Newspapers |
$826.22 |
|
|
Advertising For May 09 - Underpaid |
|
|
|
Corporate Express |
$19,990.51 |
|
|
Stationery Purchases Aug09 |
|
|
|
Different By Design |
$1,050.00 |
|
|
Graphic Design For Regional Museum |
|
|
|
Fonterra Brands Aust (P&B) Pty Ltd |
$39.72 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$35,854.48 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$63,014.34 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$324,346.80 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$15,073.35 |
|
|
Diesel Fuel For Fleet |
|
|
|
Our Community Pty Ltd |
$280.00 |
|
|
Annual Subscription - Grants |
|
|
|
Raeco International Pty Ltd |
$38,243.31 |
|
|
Fit Out For WLCC |
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services |
$70,466.36 |
|
|
Cleaning Services - Aug 09 |
|
|
|
Retech Rubber Pty Ltd |
$8,360.00 |
|
|
Repairs To Various Streets - Engineering |
|
|
|
Sonia Martinez |
$500.00 |
|
|
School Talks - Childrens Book Week |
|
|
|
Sports World of WA |
$493.68 |
|
|
Stock For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors |
$15,988.50 |
|
|
MRF Loader Hire |
|
|
|
The Spinney Press |
$377.10 |
|
|
Stock Purchase For Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
|
00001009 |
06/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$1,688.72 |
|
|
Mail Preparation Fees Sept09 |
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$189.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$665.90 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$310,139.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$72.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,155.66 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$748.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Dale Sutherland |
$65.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Alex Heights ADC |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$2,316.90 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
June Taylor |
$65.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - The Heights DC |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,189.40 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Lisa Tiang - Alexander Heights Podiatry Clinic |
$25.00 |
|
|
Financial Subsidy - Community Services |
|
|
|
Lorraine Mortensen |
$65.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Quinns Adult Day Centre |
|
|
|
Miss Deanne Matthews |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Study Assistance - Grad Cert Of Employment Law - HR |
|
|
|
Mr Daniel Simms |
$89.90 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage 01/08-31/08/09 100% Business Use |
|
|
|
Mr Michael Penson |
$135.48 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Purchase Of AS/NZS4360 Set - Risk Management Text Book |
|
|
|
Ms Sarah McMahon |
$55.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Alex Heights ADC |
|
|
|
Ruth Butler |
$65.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Quinns ADC |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$3,899.50 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Vernon Mortensen |
$65.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Honorarium - Quinns ADC |
|
|
|
|
|
00001010 |
06/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Jon Kelly |
$5,966.67 |
|
|
Mayoral Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001011 |
08/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Browne's Limestone Construction Pty Ltd |
$101,050.84 |
|
|
Progress Claim 3 Construction Of Limestone Retaining Walls At Ocean Dve Quinns Rocks |
|
|
|
Dianne Sigel (Art Teacher) |
$2,535.50 |
|
|
Potter Classes - Community Development |
|
|
|
PS Structures P/L |
$112,200.00 |
|
|
Progress Payment 22 - Wanneroo Library And Cultural Centre |
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services |
$15,237.19 |
|
|
Cleaning Services - Aug 09 |
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$108.24 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001012 |
13/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$7,339.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Barlow Superannuation Fund |
$2,719.35 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Bernice Duncan |
$45.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Quinns Adc |
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gray |
$1,886.82 |
|
|
Travel Allowance Jul To Sep09 |
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer |
$338.10 |
|
|
Travel Allowance Sep 09 |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens |
$389.16 |
|
|
Travel Allowance Sep09 |
|
|
|
FESA |
$2,965,781.10 |
|
|
2009/10 ESL Quarter 1 - Finance |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,406.33 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super |
$1,560.17 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd |
$1,071.40 |
|
|
Public Liability Insurance |
|
|
|
Jeffrey Locke Pty Ltd |
$7,124.70 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Mr Daniel Simms |
$150.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage 01 June-31 July |
|
|
|
Mr John Paton |
$25.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage September 09 50% |
|
|
|
Mr Michael Penson |
$61.08 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Refreshment For Office |
|
|
|
Ms Karen Caple |
$26.21 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage September 09 |
|
|
|
Salamanca Superannuation Fund |
$1,157.51 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund |
$418.05 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
The Michael Penson Superannuation Fund |
$2,194.62 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
The Saunders Superannuation Fund-Pac |
$572.94 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
TPS Retirement Fund |
$47.78 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Volunteering WA |
$187.00 |
|
|
Membership Renewal - Community Services |
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation |
$1,005,609.64 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Western Power |
$1,558.00 |
|
|
Unmetered Point Of Supply - Alexandria View |
|
|
|
|
|
00001013 |
13/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec Australasia Pty Ltd |
$995.50 |
|
|
Office Chair For Business Improvements |
|
|
|
DME Contractors |
$49,005.00 |
|
|
Progress Claim 1 Mindarie/Quinns Beach Access Ramp |
|
|
|
Dysons Packaging Pty Ltd |
$374.00 |
|
|
Foam Cups - Fleet |
|
|
|
Financial Counsellors Association WA |
$1,050.00 |
|
|
Conference - 2009 Financial Counsellors Assoc - A Adam, H Gordon And H Eccleston |
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$1,265.00 |
|
|
Professional Services - NCC15Kw Photovoltaic System Installation |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$66,559.31 |
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$12.91 |
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For Wanneroo Fire Depot Building |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$7,356.80 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$54,972.86 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Movers & Shakers Business Relocations |
$1,834.80 |
|
|
Moving Of Employees To New Workstations |
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$399.30 |
|
|
Supply/Fit Windscreen - WN32407 |
|
|
|
Podiatry Services |
$420.00 |
|
|
Podiatry Services - Community Services |
|
|
|
PS Structures P/L |
$103,400.00 |
|
|
Progress Claim - New Cultural And Learning Centre |
|
|
|
R Moore & Sons |
$3,214.85 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi |
$206.25 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$1,086.45 |
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store |
|
|
|
Thiess Pty Ltd |
$272.25 |
|
|
Hire of Cherry Picker - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001014 |
14/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Alan Blencowe |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$1,833.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Monks |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Ian Goodenough |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gray |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Maureen Grierson |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens |
$450.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Tracey Roberts |
$583.33 |
|
|
Councillors Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001016 |
20/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$179,360.59 |
|
|
Fuel Issues For Sept 09 |
|
00001015 |
09/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Badge Construction (WA) Pty Ltd |
$130,620.89 |
|
|
Progress Claim 5 Wangara Mrf Building Extensions |
|
|
|
|
|
00001017 |
20/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
3 Australia |
$1,202.44 |
|
|
SMS Charges For Fire Services |
|
|
|
Angela Proctor |
$45.50 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$189.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$684.80 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$288,640.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Builders Registration Board |
$20,044.50 |
|
|
Collection Agency Fees - Sep09 |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$72.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,246.12 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$736.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf |
$8,777.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Expenditure And Contract Management Fees For September 09 - Quinns Caravan Park |
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani |
$45.50 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd |
$23,430.16 |
|
|
Marangaroo Golf Course Commissions 1-30/09/09 - Property |
|
|
|
FESA |
$12,083.78 |
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For The Community Fire Manager For The Period 26.06.09-24.09.09 & 26.06.06-10.09.09 - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
Frank Hamilton |
$91.00 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
Gregory Johnson |
$91.00 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$2,315.75 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo |
$100.10 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
|
|
Kay Prentice |
$154.70 |
|
|
Key Holder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,173.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Mr Bruce Waddell |
$45.50 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
Mr John Baker |
$68.25 |
|
|
Key Holder Payment |
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty |
$145.60 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
Ms Marilyn Losinjanin |
$338.10 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Portofinos Voucher For Race In Your Rates Prize Function |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - 1000 Business Card Magnets For WLCC Open Day - Marketing |
|
|
|
Peggy Brown |
$91.00 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$3,899.50 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$917.53 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001018 |
25/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
ABC Distributors (WA) |
$5,959.80 |
|
|
Various Items For Depot Stores |
|
|
|
ABnote Australasia Pty Ltd |
$748.00 |
|
|
Barcodes For Library Services |
|
|
|
Acclaimed Catering |
$5,799.75 |
|
|
Catering For Council Functions |
|
|
|
Action Lock Service |
$84.00 |
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Active Games & Entertainment |
$340.00 |
|
|
Hire Of Belly Bumpers For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Actors Now |
$333.00 |
|
|
Event Spruiker - Marketing |
|
|
|
Adaptive Frameworks |
$1,865.00 |
|
|
Training - Prince2 Foundation - Attendee C Forbes - IT |
|
|
|
Adasound |
$550.00 |
|
|
Equipment For Aquamotion Opening |
|
|
|
Adcorp Marketing Communications |
$742.89 |
|
|
Seek Templates For HR |
|
|
|
Advance Vacuumed Gutters |
$285.00 |
|
|
Clean Gutters & Downpipes At Jenolan Way Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Advanced Nursery |
$499.40 |
|
|
Plants - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Advanced Waste Solutions Pty Ltd |
$23,958.00 |
|
|
Various Items - City Business |
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving |
$8,529.62 |
|
|
Paving Services For Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
AHG Paper & Magazine Delivery |
$17.00 |
|
|
Newspaper Deliveries For Library Services |
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd |
$488.60 |
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Stores |
|
|
|
Alance Newspaper and Magazine Delivery |
$17.28 |
|
|
Newspapers For Library Services |
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$100.00 |
|
|
Floral Arrangement For M Quigley - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
Allied Forklifts Pty Ltd |
$1,016.40 |
|
|
Supply Diesel Forklift - WRC |
|
|
|
Allmark & Associates Pty Ltd |
$231.00 |
|
|
Stationery For City Business |
|
|
|
Allpack Signs |
$4,948.90 |
|
|
Various Items For Engineering |
|
|
|
Supply & Install Warning Signs - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Supply And Install Overlays Stickers Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates - Various Sites |
|
|
|
Sign For Road Works - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Direction Signs For Library & Museum - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Traffic Cones - Engineering |
|
|
|
Sign - Immunisation Clinic - Health |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$1,031.05 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
Amlec House Pty Ltd |
$7,700.00 |
|
|
Evaluation Of A Design And Implementation Strategy For CCTV - Rangers |
|
|
|
Angus & Robertson Pty Ltd |
$342.99 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
ANL Container Hire & Sales Pty Ltd |
$369.05 |
|
|
Sea Container For Program Services |
|
|
|
APMM Group |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
1St Payment-Certificate III In Civil Construction (Plant Operation) Existing Worker Trainee For Gary Trichet - HR |
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$2,571.64 |
|
|
Cash Collection For The City |
|
|
|
Arrow Pressure Wash |
$391.60 |
|
|
Supply & Fit New Gun - Fleet |
|
|
|
Art on the Move |
$1,947.00 |
|
|
Professional Development Workshop 24-25/09/09 Capacity Building |
|
|
|
Asbestossafe Pty Ltd |
$3,150.00 |
|
|
Pickup Asbestos Sheeting For Parks |
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd |
$316.25 |
|
|
Road Materials - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Aussie Clotheslines |
$2,139.90 |
|
|
Provide/Install Clotheline - Quinns Caravan Park |
|
|
|
Australian Government National Measurement Institute |
$798.27 |
|
|
Analysis Fees - Conservation |
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$5,060.00 |
|
|
Training - Outlook Intro 17/09/09 - HR |
|
|
|
Training - Workplace Leadership 15/09/09 - HR |
|
|
|
Australian Native Nurseries Group |
$1,644.28 |
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz |
$690.25 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Plants - Marketing |
|
|
|
Australian Turf Industries |
$56,439.49 |
|
|
Maintenance Works July09 At Carramar And Marangaroo Golf Courses |
|
|
|
Avis |
$550.00 |
|
|
Bus Hire For Aboriginal Seniors Group |
|
|
|
Baileys Fertilisers |
$5,104.00 |
|
|
Fertiliser For Parks |
|
|
|
Barbara Stephenson |
$90.00 |
|
|
Entertainment At Quinns Rocks Day Centre |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware |
$290.29 |
|
|
Purchase For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Barrett Displays |
$39,214.45 |
|
|
Fit Out For WLCC Museum |
|
|
|
Battery World |
$1,049.90 |
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$52,823.34 |
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN32462 |
|
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN32952 |
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$9,314.68 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Berendsen Fluid Power |
$767.14 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Beryl Weston |
$120.00 |
|
|
Cleaning Of Hall - Program Services |
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
Power Upgrade And Area Lighting - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Best Roads Group |
$11,806.72 |
|
|
Grinding And Spotting For New Lines At Hartman Drive Wangara - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$2,024.00 |
|
|
Calico Bags For Marketing |
|
|
|
Crystal Balloons - Marketing |
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$3,806.00 |
|
|
Vanellus Multifleet - Fleet |
|
|
|
Brikmakers |
$1,203.05 |
|
|
Easipave - Engineering |
|
|
|
Browne's Limestone Construction Pty Ltd |
$70,523.51 |
|
|
Progress Claim 4 Construction Of Limestone Retaining Walls At Ocean Dve Quinns |
|
|
|
BT Equipment Pty Ltd |
$1,102.64 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Bulldog Graphics |
$7,238.28 |
|
|
New Panels For Reception - WLCC |
|
|
|
WLCC - Additional Graphics Work For Museum Spaces - Heritage And Museum Services |
|
|
|
Bullivants Pty Ltd |
$67.98 |
|
|
Various Items For Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$5,936.45 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Burkeair Pty Ltd |
$11,657.45 |
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance Works For The City |
|
|
|
Butler Group |
$2,640.00 |
|
|
Butler Group Master Class - IT Innovations For Business Transformation - IT |
|
|
|
Bynorm |
$80.85 |
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
C & EM Harmer |
$142.60 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - CEO's Office |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Marketing |
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$488.67 |
|
|
Cabcharge Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Cafe Corporate |
$501.09 |
|
|
Full Service Of Elected Members Coffee Machine - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Candor Training & Consultancy |
$2,310.00 |
|
|
Training On Conflict Management For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Car Care (WA) Mindarie |
$75.00 |
|
|
Cleaning Of Fire Truck |
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$3,872.57 |
|
|
Sand For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sand Supplies - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Carroll & Richardson-Flagworld Pty Ltd |
$427.50 |
|
|
National Flag Handwaver - Marketing |
|
|
|
CBC Bearings WA Pty Ltd |
$400.73 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
CCH Australia Ltd |
$89.00 |
|
|
Book Purchase For HR |
|
|
|
CD Autos Electrics Pty Ltd |
$1,455.30 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cell 6 Pty Ltd |
$209.00 |
|
|
Rubble From Hawkins Road Jandabup - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$1,564.20 |
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Stores |
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$1,123.20 |
|
|
Catering - Hospitality |
|
|
|
Chess Moving |
$154.00 |
|
|
Delivery Packing Boxes For Moving - Information & Business Improvements |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$7,659.60 |
|
|
Various Items Purchased For IT |
|
|
|
Clark Rubber |
$1,759.00 |
|
|
Various Items Purchased For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Clean Sweep |
$8,091.88 |
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$14,524.14 |
|
|
Equipment Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$463.07 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Drinks For Elected Members Bar - Hospitality |
|
|
|
ColourPoint Print & Design |
$2,112.00 |
|
|
Printing - Infringement Books - Rangers |
|
|
|
Commercial Stationery Office National |
$295.00 |
|
|
File Cabinet - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$121.00 |
|
|
Volunteer National Police Check Aug09 - Program Services |
|
|
|
Community Newspapers |
$54,224.92 |
|
|
Advertising - Aug 09 |
|
|
|
Advertising For Sep 09 |
|
|
|
Computelec Pty Ltd |
$3,068.98 |
|
|
Software - ISA Server - IT |
|
|
|
Microsoft Publisher 2007 - IT |
|
|
|
Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition & MS Win Server Standard 2008 English - IT |
|
|
|
Cora Bike Rack Pty Ltd |
$742.50 |
|
|
Bike Rack For Girrawheen Library - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$3,807.72 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Cubic Solutions |
$92.40 |
|
|
Various Items - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd |
$3,857.80 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cutting Edges Pty Ltd |
$1,327.23 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
CVC Street Numbers |
$5,214.00 |
|
|
Linemarking - Depot Workshop |
|
|
|
Line Marking - Depot Parking Area |
|
|
|
Linemarking - Kingsway Sporting Complex |
|
|
|
DA Information Services Pty Ltd |
$807.09 |
|
|
Subscriptions For Libraries |
|
|
|
DBS Fencing |
$8,497.50 |
|
|
Boom Gates Rotary Park |
|
|
|
Department of Sport & Recreation |
$425.00 |
|
|
Ern Halliday 10/09/09 Camp –Team building for HR |
|
|
|
Department Of The Premier And Cabinet |
$99.60 |
|
|
Government Gazette Advertising 22.09.09 - Rating |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$199.68 |
|
|
Locking Services - Stores |
|
|
|
Donald Cant Watts Corke (WA) Pty Ltd |
$3,531.00 |
|
|
Provide Cost Planning Services For Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubrooms - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd |
$1,057.10 |
|
|
CSS Emulsion - Engineering |
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$96,862.20 |
|
|
Concrete Works At Various Locations For Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$1,945.75 |
|
|
Vehicle Electrical Repairs - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Drive Straight Alignment & Brake Service |
$3,594.80 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
DVG Wanneroo Mitsubishi |
$23,851.45 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Dzolv Products Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
Purchases For Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$2,231.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
$23,572.27 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble For Engineering |
|
|
|
E'Co Australia Ltd |
$798.60 |
|
|
Purchases For Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd |
$167.37 |
|
|
Hydrolab Hire - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Safety Gloves - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Edgewater Communications |
$115.50 |
|
|
Service Call To Wanneroo Recreation Centre To Program System To Ring Line 3 - IT |
|
|
|
Educational Experience Pty Ltd |
$765.16 |
|
|
Craft Materials For Program Services |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$11,837.95 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Environment House |
$330.00 |
|
|
Presentation - Energy Efficiency Greenhouse Gasbusting By Rob Gulley 05/09/09 |
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd |
$672.65 |
|
|
Parts Cleaner Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services Pty Ltd |
$7,568.00 |
|
|
Callout/Service Charges For The City |
|
|
|
Monthly Testing - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.) |
$79,149.21 |
|
|
Parks/Landscapes - Butler September 09 |
|
|
|
Maintenance - Sump Kingsbridge Park September 09 |
|
|
|
Maintenance - Community Centre Butler Sept 09 |
|
|
|
Maintenance - Wheeled Sports Park Sept 09 |
|
|
|
Maintenance Sep09 - Additional Parks |
|
|
|
Express Towing Services |
$352.00 |
|
|
Towing Services For Fleet |
|
|
|
Fast Finishing Services WA |
$616.00 |
|
|
Council Minute Book Binding - Governance |
|
|
|
Fence Hire WA |
$120.00 |
|
|
Reinstall Temp Fence - Yanchep House |
|
|
|
Find Wise |
$2,905.10 |
|
|
Location Of Services - Pinjar Rd Tapping |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Dundebar Rd Wanneroo |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Wanneroo Showgrounds |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Fleming Parkway |
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA |
$5,418.83 |
|
|
Overtrousers & Jackets - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Fonterra Brands Aust (P&B) Pty Ltd |
$315.66 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Foodlink Food Service |
$1,013.64 |
|
|
Various Catering Items - Fleet |
|
|
|
Forcorp Pty Ltd |
$5,181.00 |
|
|
Led Beacons - Stores |
|
|
|
Forpark Australia |
$275.00 |
|
|
Gungurru Park Fix Up - Projects |
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd |
$396.00 |
|
|
Various Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$741.39 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,586.35 |
|
|
Paper Stock For Governance |
|
|
|
Copy/Lease Charges For Reprographics |
|
|
|
Gecko Contracting Turf & Landscape Maintenance |
$56,768.80 |
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Hepburn Ave - Kingsway Entrance |
|
|
|
Streetscapes - Darch And Marangaroo Aug 09 |
|
|
|
Additional Works - Various Locations |
|
|
|
Streetscape Maintenance Aug 09 |
|
|
|
Works At Hartman Dve - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Gemtek Automation |
$385.00 |
|
|
Cabling Works At WLCC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Geoffs Tree Service |
$59,436.08 |
|
|
Works At Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
GEON |
$3,371.50 |
|
|
Re-Useable Envelopes - Rangers |
|
|
|
Print Dog Registration Notices - Rangers |
|
|
|
Dl Fire Notices - Rangers |
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$78,801.29 |
|
|
Professional Services - Flynn Drive Wanneroo Road To Mathers Drive - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Hartman Drive Dual Carriageway Design & Documentation - - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Final Claim - Cow-NCC 15Kw Photovoltaic System Installation - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Variation To Contract - Kingsway Sporting Complex Stage 2 Construction Phase - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Stage 3 - Kingsway Football Oval Modifications Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Design & Documentation For Kingsway Netball Centre Upgrade - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Stage 3A And 4 Design - Kingsway Sport Redevelopment Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
GHEMS Holding Pty Ltd |
$727.10 |
|
|
Seed Collection & Propagation At Gungurru Park - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Globe Australia Pty Ltd |
$314.60 |
|
|
Purchases For Parks |
|
|
|
GPR Truck Sales & Service |
$220.16 |
|
|
Axle Alignment - Fleet |
|
|
|
Graffiti Systems Australia |
$22,047.30 |
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota Daihatsu |
$12,460.25 |
|
|
Vehicle Services For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Grant Cottrell |
$400.00 |
|
|
Entertainment - Childrens Book Week - Library Services |
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
Grasstrees For Hartman Dve |
|
|
|
Green Skills Inc |
$1,655.50 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Conservation |
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$1,870.00 |
|
|
Equipment Hire For Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$2,228.42 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Hallmark Editions |
$1,280.00 |
|
|
Renewal Of Subscription To Councillor Magazine - Governance |
|
|
|
Conference - Innovation In Planning & Development Assessment Summit 09 - Attendee H Gill - IT |
|
|
|
Hands-On Infection Control |
$120.00 |
|
|
Hepatitis B Post Vaccination Waste Services - HR |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$10,502.72 |
|
|
Construction Materials Delivered To Various Locations |
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$1,338.48 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Contracts |
|
|
|
Heathridge IGA |
$51.48 |
|
|
Groceries For Capacity Building |
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics |
$1,629.19 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$798.24 |
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$1,451.52 |
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Hosemart |
$7.57 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Hughan Saw Service |
$46.20 |
|
|
Retooth Blade - Fleet |
|
|
|
Humes |
$27,896.42 |
|
|
Construction Materials Delivered To Various Locations |
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$25,954.50 |
|
|
Supply/Install New Electrics And Pump Breakwater Park |
|
|
|
Ibolt Pty Ltd |
$3,294.50 |
|
|
Gate For Ridgewood Park - Parks |
|
|
|
Replace Gate - Butler Community Centre |
|
|
|
Replace Gate - Scenic Dve Rec Centre |
|
|
|
Supply And Install Gate - Brampton Park Butler |
|
|
|
Ice and Oven Technologies Pty Ltd |
$5,832.20 |
|
|
Supply & Install Cuber Ice Head - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Incredible Bulk |
$14,960.00 |
|
|
Equipment Hire - WRC |
|
|
|
Innerspace Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd |
$18,296.30 |
|
|
Various Items For Wanneroo Library - Capacity Building |
|
|
|
Integrated Distribution Pty Ltd |
$453.00 |
|
|
Tools - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$56,727.31 |
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
Internet Business Corporation |
$429.00 |
|
|
Website Hosting - Marketing |
|
|
|
IPWEA |
$258.50 |
|
|
Training - Perth Plant And Vehicle Management Workshop 01/10/09 - Ian Barker |
|
|
|
Irene Carbone |
$805.00 |
|
|
Deposit For Entertainment - Marketing |
|
|
|
ITT Water & Wastewater Australia Limited |
$3,712.50 |
|
|
Monthly Preventative Maintenance Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$4,148.16 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
JCA Dealer Services |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Camera For Fleet |
|
|
|
Jim's Garage Doors |
$1,254.00 |
|
|
Remove Door And Fit Planetary Gears - WRC |
|
|
|
Jmac Industries |
$1,040.33 |
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
John Stevens Carpentry |
$1,914.00 |
|
|
Carpentry Services For Waste |
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$170.50 |
|
|
Medical Fees - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Joondalup Photo Design |
$1,875.00 |
|
|
Photography - What's Happening - Marketing |
|
|
|
Photography - WLCC General Promo Images - Marketing |
|
|
|
Photography - Aquamotion Opening - Marketing |
|
|
|
Keynote Conferences |
$140.00 |
|
|
Waste And Recycle Conference 15-18/09/09 - S Spinks |
|
|
|
Kinetic Theatre Company |
$935.00 |
|
|
Entertainment - Aquamotion Opening |
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$5,181.00 |
|
|
Phil Renkin Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Apply Anti Slip Coating - Phil Renkin Centre |
|
|
|
Clean Toilet Floors At Gumblossom Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Clean Floor Tiles At Clarkson Youth Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Supply/Install New Floor Coating At Workshop - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Kmart Joondalup |
$387.30 |
|
|
Ninetendo Wii - Program Activities |
|
|
|
Kott Gunning Lawyers |
$4,425.85 |
|
|
Professional Fees - Kingsway - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Dismissal - HR |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$6,796.26 |
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Various Printer Parts And Printer Purchases - IT |
|
|
|
L & T Venables |
$855.78 |
|
|
Various Items For WRC |
|
|
|
Landmark |
$1,762.28 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Laser Exchange |
$198.00 |
|
|
Callout For IT |
|
|
|
Latitude Creative Services |
$6,334.00 |
|
|
Media Production Services - Heritage |
|
|
|
Len French Fencing Contractor |
$760.00 |
|
|
Fence Repairs At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Liftrite Hire & Sales |
$1,043.79 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
Liwa Aquatics |
$90.00 |
|
|
Aquatics Membership Accreditation - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia |
$390.00 |
|
|
09/10 Membership - G Prus |
|
|
|
Louie's Flyscreens Allsafe |
$1,710.00 |
|
|
Supply And Install Security Screen For Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services Pty Ltd |
$17,600.00 |
|
|
Topdress - Wanneroo Showgrounds |
|
|
|
Supply Spread & Smudge - Lake Joondalup Park |
|
|
|
Lyons & Peirce |
$2,062.50 |
|
|
Equipment Hire - Engineering |
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company Pty Ltd |
$26,214.47 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
Magnetic Autocontrol |
$385.00 |
|
|
Service Callout - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$8,145.81 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
Manicured Lawns |
$2,810.50 |
|
|
Mowing Services For The City |
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Company |
$601.70 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Marquee Magic |
$3,290.00 |
|
|
Marquee And Equipment - Aquamotion Opening |
|
|
|
Maxwell Robinson & Phelps |
$549.00 |
|
|
Weed Control At Gungurru - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Glyphosate Spraying At Various Locations - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$78,933.53 |
|
|
Heavy Vehicle Hire For The City |
|
|
|
McIntosh & Son |
$1,698.74 |
|
|
Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs 98308 |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors |
$14,497.65 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Legal Advice On Retaining Wall At Landsdale Road Landsdale - Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - 17956 Developer Contribution Fund - Property |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Mirrabooka Avenue - Compensation Claim - Town Planning |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - East Wanneroo Cells 1-6 - Incorrect Lot Numbers - Town Planning |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - 21670 Sat Reviews By Soiland And Amatek Pty Ltd Re Peat Stockpile - Planning |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Dog Act Prosecution - Rangers |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Notice Prosecution - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Health Act Prosecution - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
McLernon's Supply & Demand |
$904.59 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Wooden Table For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Media Monitors WA Pty Ltd |
$321.14 |
|
|
Monitoring Services - Marketing |
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$650.01 |
|
|
Provision of Programming - Marketing |
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$481.80 |
|
|
Stationery Items For WLCC |
|
|
|
Label Tapes For Libraries |
|
|
|
Metrocount |
$167.20 |
|
|
Battery Pack For Infrastructure Planning |
|
|
|
Mey Equipment |
$371.16 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
Micrographic Applications |
$15,268.89 |
|
|
Canon Mircrofilm Scanner - IT |
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$1,174.36 |
|
|
Purchase Of Steel For General Repair - WRC/Fleet |
|
|
|
Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd |
$535.45 |
|
|
Limestone Hue Bricks - Marangaroo Drive Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Mindarie Bus Charter Pty Ltd |
$583.00 |
|
|
Bus Hire - Program Services |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$312,809.17 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$1,523.50 |
|
|
Playground Equipment - Parks |
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd |
$442.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Mobile Shred Onsite |
$99.00 |
|
|
Shredding For Elected Members |
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre |
$873.45 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
Motorlife |
$508.20 |
|
|
Inox For Stores |
|
|
|
Move It |
$363.00 |
|
|
Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd |
$6,067.97 |
|
|
Professional Services - Mindarie Beach Universal Access Ramp |
|
|
|
Mrs Mac's Traditional Pastries |
$85.40 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Multispares |
$657.42 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Museums Australia (WA) |
$150.00 |
|
|
Workshop "Order In The House" 22/07/09 - K Gough, C Davis, E Nguyen, J Dohnt, C Leigh And T Thomas |
|
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services |
$825.00 |
|
|
Various Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
New Internationalist Publications Pty Ltd |
$324.00 |
|
|
Book Stock For Library Services |
|
|
|
Newscape Contractors |
$103,529.97 |
|
|
Streetscapes - North June 09 |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Merriwa & Quinns September 09 |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Yanchep/Two Rocks Sep09 |
|
|
|
Landscaping - Various Sites |
|
|
|
NewsXpress Ocean Keys |
$32.90 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Northern Corridor Contracting |
$16,543.50 |
|
|
Landscape Works For The City |
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$3,355.00 |
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmowers & Chainsaw Specialist |
$416.90 |
|
|
Stihl Blower For Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Nuford |
$256.40 |
|
|
Lamp Set For Fleet |
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
Investment Advisory & Reporting Fee - Sept 09 |
|
|
|
Oars Across The Waters Pty Ltd |
$1,980.00 |
|
|
Grass Roots Training & Meeting – team building for HR |
|
|
|
O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
$2,782.70 |
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$969.41 |
|
|
Printer Cartridge - Infrastructure Planning |
|
|
|
Onesteel Distribution |
$854.76 |
|
|
Steel Suppliers - Waste Services |
|
|
|
OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd |
$19,580.77 |
|
|
Supply Annealed Spec Bailing - WRC |
|
|
|
Orica Australia P/L |
$263.34 |
|
|
Annual Supply Of Chlorine Gas For Aquatics |
|
|
|
P & M Automotive Equipment |
$121.00 |
|
|
Hoist Inspections - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Pacific Brands |
$92.40 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Stores |
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries |
$783.20 |
|
|
Wanneroo Recycle Bin Exchange - Information & Business Improvements |
|
|
|
Parins |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN32332 |
|
|
|
Personalised Landscape & Design |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
Landscaping Services At Old Wanneroo School House |
|
|
|
Perth Bin Hire |
$56,540.00 |
|
|
Truck Driver/Hire - WRC |
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd |
$767.36 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
Peter Wood Pty Ltd |
$9,194.35 |
|
|
Ringlock Fence - The Spot |
|
|
|
Bollards At Carramar School Grounds |
|
|
|
Fencing Repair At 35 Burbridge Koondoola - Parks |
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters |
$250.00 |
|
|
Hire 21 Seater Bus - 22.09.09 - Program Services |
|
|
|
Pink Healthcare Services |
$2,164.22 |
|
|
Sanitary Service For Various Locations Sep 09 |
|
|
|
Pirtek Malaga Pty Ltd |
$3,788.75 |
|
|
Vehicle Hoses For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Pisconeri Fine Foods & Wines |
$63.85 |
|
|
Cafe Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Pitney Bowes Australia Pty |
$1,989.90 |
|
|
Service Agreement Folding Machine - Governance |
|
|
|
Pittop Conveyor Products Pty Ltd |
$1,506.89 |
|
|
Belts For WRC |
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$660.00 |
|
|
Plants For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$316.70 |
|
|
Power Shield Defender 1.6Kva Ups - IT |
|
|
|
PPG Industries Australia Pty Ltd |
$106.99 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$6,645.10 |
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
Prime Health Group Pty Ltd |
$1,380.50 |
|
|
Medical Fees For HR new staff |
|
|
|
Printstuf |
$546.70 |
|
|
Aged & Disability Services Base Stock A4 - Program Services |
|
|
|
Pro Q Painting Pty Ltd |
$13,200.00 |
|
|
Complete Internal Painting - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd |
$19,673.94 |
|
|
Inspect Playgrounds And Clean Softfall Areas - Parks |
|
|
|
Proquip Machinery |
$353.25 |
|
|
Replace Chipper Blades - Conservation |
|
|
|
Sharpening Blades - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$9,386.24 |
|
|
Safety Items For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Public Transport Authority |
$295.00 |
|
|
Seminar - Contract Management Responsibility 16/09/09 - D Braithwaite |
|
|
|
Pwe Valuations Pty Ltd |
$1,411.00 |
|
|
Valuation For Acquisition Lot 3#329 Gnangara Rd Wangara - Professional Services - Property |
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$594.00 |
|
|
NDM Testing - Ocean Dve |
|
|
|
Quantum Multimedia Communications |
$223.99 |
|
|
SMS Charges - Fire Services |
|
|
|
R E Miles |
$125.00 |
|
|
Pest Removal - Old Primary School |
|
|
|
Rainbow Mulch |
$2,516.80 |
|
|
Bulk Chip Red - Parks |
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd |
$24,049.65 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - WRC |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - City Business |
|
|
|
Reclaim Industries Ltd |
$275.00 |
|
|
Softfall Rubber Repair - Parks |
|
|
|
Records Management Assoc of Aust |
$58.00 |
|
|
Training - Marketing & Change Management Strategies 22/10/09 For A Boyce - Records |
|
|
|
Red Hot Parcel Taxi |
$185.15 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services |
$106,148.70 |
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd |
$209.00 |
|
|
Cooler Rental - Banksia Grove Community Centre |
|
|
|
Reinol WA |
$338.58 |
|
|
Hand Cleaner Dispenser - Fleet |
|
|
|
Reliance Petroleum |
$1,663.47 |
|
|
Fuel For Stores |
|
|
|
Renshaws Revegetation Pty Ltd |
$4,742.32 |
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
Repco - Bayswater |
$1,716.39 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Retravision - Joondalup |
$401.95 |
|
|
Kettle For Fleet |
|
|
|
Westinghouse Bar Fridge - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Richgro |
$82.01 |
|
|
Loam For Parks |
|
|
|
Riot Art & Craft |
$219.75 |
|
|
Craft Items For Program Services |
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$346.50 |
|
|
Traffic Services - Capacity Building |
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$150,720.38 |
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Robert G Willis |
$20,501.80 |
|
|
Consultancy Services To Conduct Feasibility Study - Joondalup Drive - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Rocla Quarry Products |
$1,659.99 |
|
|
Bricklayers Sand - Stores |
|
|
|
Plasterers Sand - Engineering |
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$2,554.20 |
|
|
Cutting Blades - Depot Stores |
|
|
|
Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$300.00 |
|
|
Watch Around Water Licence Renewal - Aquamotion 2009/2010 |
|
|
|
Lifeguard Requalifications For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
S & C Linemarking |
$289.19 |
|
|
Remarked Parking Bays - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Saferight |
$803.00 |
|
|
Rapid Response Kit - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Safety World |
$7,020.93 |
|
|
Safety Items For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Sanax St Andrews Pharmacy |
$95.70 |
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
SAP Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,491.05 |
|
|
SAP Maintenance/Renewal 21/12/09-20/12/2010 - IT |
|
|
|
Sarum Industries Pty Ltd |
$3,833.50 |
|
|
Fencing Repairs At Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
Schiavello Wa Pty Ltd |
$165.00 |
|
|
Office Furniture - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Scotts Trimming Service |
$187.00 |
|
|
Repairs For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sense-IT Recruitment Solutions Pty Ltd |
$3,114.10 |
|
|
Casual Labour For IT |
|
|
|
Shannon Lyons |
$331.92 |
|
|
Kids Holiday Art Workshop - Program Services |
|
|
|
Sico South Pacific Ltd |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
Mobile Folding Table - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$2,392.15 |
|
|
Annual Supply Of Pool Chemicals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Sign A Rama |
$1,133.00 |
|
|
Provide & Install Sign - Various Sites - Property |
|
|
|
Sirenco |
$165.00 |
|
|
Repair Light Tanker - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Skipper Trucks Belmont |
$326.30 |
|
|
Vehicle Service WN32641 - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
SMB Electrical Services |
$24,646.16 |
|
|
Power Distribution Upgrade - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Supply & Install Electrical Pit At Wanneroo Showgrounds - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
SMC Pneumatics (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$38.28 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Solargain PV Pty Ltd |
$219,450.00 |
|
|
Install Solar Energy System At New Civic Centre |
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$1,110.97 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sound Pack Solutions |
$504.35 |
|
|
Bookstock For Libaries |
|
|
|
Southern Scene |
$322.78 |
|
|
Book Purchases For Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Sports Circuit Linemarking |
$250.00 |
|
|
Linemarking Gumblossom Park |
|
|
|
Sports World of WA |
$8,729.60 |
|
|
Stock For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$392.74 |
|
|
Various Items - Program Services |
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$720.37 |
|
|
Knapsack 15Ltr - Parks |
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors |
$10,136.50 |
|
|
Loader Hire - WRC |
|
|
|
Star Three Media Pty Ltd |
$158.40 |
|
|
Renewal Of Domain Name www.Wanneroo-Property.Com.Au For 2 Years |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$2,528.43 |
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store |
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$377.30 |
|
|
Uniforms For Fire Services |
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service |
$498.92 |
|
|
Laundry Of City Linen - Hospitality |
|
|
|
STIHL Shop Greenwood |
$1,006.45 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Stomp Pty Ltd |
$1,605.20 |
|
|
Bookstock For Libraries |
|
|
|
Structure |
$660.00 |
|
|
Investigation & Report - Scenic Drive Wanneroo Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Subaru Wangara |
$44,108.50 |
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Forester WN33009 $44,108.50 - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo |
$40.00 |
|
|
Catering For Meeting - Library Services |
|
|
|
Sun City News |
$1,197.00 |
|
|
Advertising - September 09 - Marketing |
|
|
|
Sun City Newsagency |
$40.80 |
|
|
Newspapers For Yanchep Library |
|
|
|
Sunhawk Pty Ltd |
$4,345.00 |
|
|
Hydromulching With Paper And Gluon Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Sunny Brushware Supplies |
$1,451.10 |
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
Sunny Sign Company |
$544.50 |
|
|
Steel Banding - Engineering |
|
|
|
Supersealing Pty Ltd |
$990.00 |
|
|
Crack Sealing - Nannatee Way |
|
|
|
Susanne Parker |
$310.80 |
|
|
October Holiday Art Workshop - Program |
|
|
|
Swim Australia |
$465.00 |
|
|
Waterproof Paper - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Switch Group Pty Ltd |
$330.00 |
|
|
Repairs At WRC |
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd |
$1,431.16 |
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
Various Items - Hospitality |
|
|
|
The Basketball Man |
$1,020.00 |
|
|
Backboards For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
The Floatingest Frog |
$500.00 |
|
|
Childrens Book Week 2009 - Author Visit - Library |
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara |
$275.00 |
|
|
Generator For Marketing |
|
|
|
The Red Book Service |
$825.00 |
|
|
Subscription Fee For Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$103.40 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Tiger Tek Pty Ltd |
$1,922.36 |
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
Toll IPEC PTY LTD |
$35.79 |
|
|
Courier Service For IT |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$1,712.48 |
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
Total Eden Watering Systems |
$1,128.65 |
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$42,406.89 |
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
Toyota Material Handling (WA) Pty Ltd |
$154.00 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
T-Quip |
$1,029.30 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
Tradesales |
$291.50 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$101,593.27 |
|
|
Landscaping Services At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Tyrolit Australia Pty Ltd |
$622.60 |
|
|
Various Items For Engineering |
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$260.44 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
United Equipment |
$945.77 |
|
|
Hhyrdaulic Oil - Fleet |
|
|
|
PMP Service Caterpillar - Fleet |
|
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd |
$47,009.60 |
|
|
Progress Claim 1 Wanneroo Showgrounds Access Road |
|
|
|
Venture Equipped |
$368.50 |
|
|
Various Items For Engineering |
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$405.90 |
|
|
Labour Charge - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Deinstall/Install Equipment - Fleet Services |
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$865.38 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
WA Kerbing |
$19,893.07 |
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Ocean Dve |
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Hartman Dve |
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc |
$84,712.14 |
|
|
Subscriptions - Workplace Solutions Member 09/10 - HR |
|
|
|
Advertising - Tenders Aug09 |
|
|
|
09-10 Laws Member Subscriptions - Governance |
|
|
|
09-10 Guides Member Subscriptions - Governance |
|
|
|
09-10 Member Subscription - Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
Advertising - Sep09 - HR |
|
|
|
Wangara Trailers, Outdoor & Boating |
$2,556.40 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$646.05 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One |
$205.00 |
|
|
Tool Replacement For Parks |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators |
$4,897.47 |
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$770.00 |
|
|
Fire Base Running Coasts 2009 - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Newsagency |
$4,338.09 |
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Library Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$51,312.64 |
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$4,371.99 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$34,954.47 |
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$166.10 |
|
|
Tow Tractor - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$208.00 |
|
|
Name Badges For Various Employees |
|
|
|
Water Dynamics |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
Supply/Install Irrigation Network Central Control - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$1,915.76 |
|
|
Immunisation Clinic - Health |
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$758.54 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Libraries |
|
|
|
Westrac |
$940.94 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Whitford Marquee & Party Hire |
$190.00 |
|
|
Marquee For Spring In The Grove - Marketing |
|
|
|
Window Tinting Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,300.00 |
|
|
Supply/Apply Window Tinting At Wanneroo Library And Cultural Centre |
|
|
|
WJ & A Gordon Low Loader Services |
$742.50 |
|
|
Towing Services For Engineering |
|
|
|
Woodhead International |
$654.50 |
|
|
Professional Fees - Butler Community Centre Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$2,805.92 |
|
|
Legal Fees For Rating Services |
|
|
|
Professional Fee - Pinjar Motorcycle Park Inc Lease - Contracts |
|
|
|
Professional Fees - Boardwalk Compass Circle Yanchep - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$1,256.40 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms For Various Employees |
|
|
|
Worlds Best Products Pty Ltd |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
Graffiti Remover - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$2,164.00 |
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various |
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$33.00 |
|
|
Removal Of Recycled Waste Oil - WRC |
|
|
|
WS Coating Services |
$2,589.40 |
|
|
Repaint Trailer 98189 - Fleet |
|
|
|
Xpedite Professional Services Pty Ltd |
$1,028.50 |
|
|
Annual Maintenance - Immunisation - Health |
|
|
|
Yakka Pty Ltd |
$1,031.19 |
|
|
Uniforms For Employees |
|
|
|
Zana O'Doherty |
$330.00 |
|
|
Arboricultural Report - Conservation |
|
|
|
Zi-Argus WA Pty Ltd |
$643.50 |
|
|
Trace Internet Feed And Path For Girrawheen Library - IT |
|
|
|
|
|
00001019 |
28/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office PAYG Payments |
$1,814.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Alan Blencowe |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Monks |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Ian Goodenough |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gray |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Maureen Grierson |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$3,534.61 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And ITt Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Tracey Roberts |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,379.99 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Main Roads |
$625.33 |
|
|
Install Signs And Pavement Marking Dundebar Rd And Yagan Place |
|
|
|
Mayor Jon Kelly |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Mr Bryan Campbell |
$161.94 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Goods Purchased For WRC |
|
|
|
Mr Norman Hewer |
$3,400.00 |
|
|
Telecommunications And IT Allowance |
|
|
|
Ms Marilyn Losinjanin |
$60.49 |
|
|
Items For WLCC Open Day 25/10/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
00001020 |
28/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
Awesome Amusements |
$158.75 |
|
|
Pearl Balloons For Customer Service |
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$249.15 |
|
|
Courier Services - Health |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$65.89 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$71.50 |
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
$7,615.30 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services Pty Ltd |
$319.00 |
|
|
Supply & Install Extinguisher - Anthony Waring Park - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$1,673.10 |
|
|
Casual Labour - Contracts |
|
|
|
Kevin Smith |
$396.00 |
|
|
Training - GST For Government - Lucia Lam |
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$3,521.49 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Reekie Property Services |
$7,210.50 |
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$32.22 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
WA Gas Networks Pty Ltd |
$297.00 |
|
|
Cut/Cap Pipes At 33 Hudson St - Engineering |
|
|
|
Water Dynamics |
$7,590.00 |
|
|
Supply Of Irrigation Parts - Parks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$9,387,334.22 |
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
1004-3676 |
25/09/2009 |
Australian Business |
-$104.50 |
75485 |
15/09/2009 |
Clyde Meyer |
-$261.00 |
75103 |
11/08/2009 |
Lake Joondalup Village |
-$350.00 |
73425 |
25/03/2009 |
Dept For Planning |
-$71.50 |
73237 |
17/03/2009 |
Sandor Gyurka |
-$300.00 |
75646 |
29/09/2009 |
Kristy De Bomford |
-$59.00 |
75359 |
01/09/2009 |
Joondalup Magistrates Court |
-$63.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
-$1,209.70 |
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
Cell 1 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.07 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Cell 2 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.06 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Cell 3 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.06 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.07 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.06 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$1,749.66 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$726.88 |
|
|
Less $2044.56 Recoup reversed |
-$2,044.56 |
|
|
Cell 6 |
|
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$143.07 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$95.21 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$1,749.65 |
|
|
Mc Leods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees Infrastructure Contributions |
$726.89 |
|
|
Miluc Pty Ltd - Reimbursement of Overpaid Infrastructure Contribution |
$86,121.00 |
|
|
Less $2044.56 Recoup reversed |
-$2,044.56 |
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
Luigi Condo - Reimbursement for Ocean Reef Rd Reserve Land |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Frank Condo - Reimbursement for Ocean Reef Rd Reserve Land |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Umberto Condo - Reimbursement for Ocean Reef Rd Reserve Land |
$189,732.44 |
|
|
Boogaard Nominees P/L - Reimbursement for Ocean Reef Rd Reserve Land |
$354,458.36 |
|
|
PWE Valuations Pty Ltd |
$1,282.73 |
|
|
Less $1346.40 Recoup reversed |
-$1,346.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
$1,012,006.62 |
MANUAL JOURNAL |
|||
|
|
Incorrect Transaction - Receipting |
$399.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
$399.30 |
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account |
|||
|
|
Payroll Payments October 2009: |
|
|
|
Payroll Payments |
$1,144,788.11 |
|
|
Payroll Payments |
$15,959.89 |
|
|
Payroll Payments |
$1,094,117.85 |
|
|
Payroll Payments |
$727.36 |
|
|
Payroll Payments |
$4,196.78 |
|
|
|
$650.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total |
$2,260,439.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees October 2009: |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$31,335.83 |
|
|
CBA POS Fee |
$344.14 |
|
|
GLF TRANS Fee |
$300.00 |
|
|
LINE Fee |
$208.30 |
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$783.84 |
|
|
COMMBIZ Fee |
$401.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPAY Fee |
$9,356.89 |
|
|
BPOINT Fee |
$2,767.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees |
$45,497.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments October 2009 |
|
|
|
D Blair |
|
|
|
Stationary |
$13.44 |
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$100.00 |
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$26.00 |
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$32.52 |
|
|
Conference Attendance M Oh |
$1,243.00 |
|
|
Conference Attendance A Dharmapriya |
$1,243.00 |
|
|
Conference Attendance N Rainford |
$825.00 |
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$67.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Bentley |
|
|
|
Materials for WLCC |
$229.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Brindley |
|
|
|
In-house Catering |
$1,544.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Paton |
|
|
|
Navigator System Purchase |
$447.00 |
|
|
Fuel Purchase |
$55.94 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$32.75 |
|
|
Publication Purchase |
$671.00 |
|
|
Publication Purchase |
$300.00 |
|
|
Publication Purchase |
$478.00 |
|
|
Publication Purchase |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Kosova |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$22.00 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$50.50 |
|
|
Parking Fees |
$12.00 |
|
|
Workshop N Stawarz R Hall J Corbellini N Hoey C Murphy |
$90.00 |
|
|
Bus Charter |
$627.00 |
|
|
Publication Purchase |
$28.72 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$132.80 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$36.32 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$41.20 |
|
|
Airfare |
$176.70 |
|
|
Airfare |
$127.70 |
|
|
Airfare |
$137.70 |
|
|
Airfare |
$148.70 |
|
|
Airfare |
$392.70 |
|
|
Airfare |
$126.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Mansfield |
|
|
|
Software Purchase |
$108.82 |
|
|
Microsoft Subscription Purchase |
$512.00 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$363.00 |
|
|
Company Check |
$363.00 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Conference J Love |
$2,145.00 |
|
|
Certificate License IT |
$902.23 |
|
|
WA Community Foundation Summit |
$700.00 |
|
|
Risk Management Seminar C Round W Crawford J Love M Penson |
$1,177.40 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Company Check |
$58.50 |
|
|
Conference W Crawford |
$295.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms |
|
|
|
Hospitality |
$19.70 |
|
|
Parking Fees |
$6.40 |
|
|
Conference |
$105.00 |
|
|
Conference M Dickson |
$105.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments |
$17,030.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque October 2009 |
$11,020,250.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$11,082,779.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$13,343,219.04 |
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02/0041V01
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Michael Penson
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
File Name: AA Audit Plan 2009 2010.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a review of the 2009/10 Audit Plan.
Background
At its Ordinary Meeting held on Tuesday, 3 June 2008, Council adopted the Three Year Audit Plan 2008-2011 (GS02-06/08). The City’s previous Internal Auditors, Stamfords Advisors and Consultants Pty Ltd developed this Plan in partnership with the City, following the preparation of a Risk Assessment profile.
The Plan provided for an average 930 audit hours each year commencing 2008/09 and concluding 20010/11. This Plan formed the basis for the tender and subsequent contract with the successful tenderer and current Internal Auditors, 2020 Global.
Detail
The Audit Plan for 2009/10 lists the following audits to be undertaken:-
Subject |
Hours |
Accounts Payable |
100 |
Reserve Funds |
50 |
Investments/Financial Viability |
50 |
Human Resources (include Occupational Safety and Health) |
100 |
Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery |
50 |
Corporate Governance & Performance |
200 |
Rangers & Library Services |
50 |
Management of Building & Development Applications |
100 |
Infrastructure Maintenance |
100 |
Preparation & Attendance – EMT |
40 |
Six (6) monthly follow-up |
80 |
Total |
920 |
In addition the following four audits are outstanding from 2008/09:
Subject |
Hours |
Asset Management |
100 |
Emergency Management |
50 |
Optimisation of Council Facilities |
50 |
Capital Works |
100 |
Total |
300 |
There are two factors currently having a significant impact on the organisation that could influence the validity and effectiveness of the current Audit Plan:
1. Organisational Restructure
A new organisation structure was implemented on 1 July 2009 and is based on four ‘pillars’ and five directorates created:
· Creating the community Community Development Directorate
· Maintaining the community Infrastructure Directorate
· Engaging the community Community Development Directorate
· Running of the organisation Corporate and Strategic Performance Directorate
· Delivering the businesses of the City City Businesses Directorate
The restructure involves alignment of like activities and has required significant transfer of responsibility across the organisation. Consequently, this has required a review of a range of procedures and business processes to ensure the activities are effectively and efficiently embedded. This process is ongoing and is also linked to the City’s enterprise business system, which is currently being upgraded.
One significant element of the restructure is the creation of the Information and Business Improvement Unit within Corporate Strategy and Performance directorate. This Unit is responsible for not only managing the information and technology systems supporting the City’s corporate activities, but also the implementation of a continuous improvement framework that will progressively (subject to priorities) assist the organisation to optimise its systems and business processes to deliver improved services and efficiencies.
2. Single Business Platform
This project involves the upgrade of the City’s enterprise business system, delivering financial and property related functions from a single platform and integration of additional modules to manage business processes, such as Asset and Infrastructure Management (AIM), Customer Request Management (CRM), Fleet and On-Line Applications. In addition, this project also encompasses the implementation and integration of a new electronic document management system.
These systems are utilised across all aspects of the City’s operations and therefore represent a major implementation project, which has the potential to deliver significant business improvements. However, due to the scale of the project, the implementation will be phased over the balance of the financial year, with further business improvements through review of workflows being progressively introduced.
Comment
The organisation restructure and single platform project are having a significant impact on the organisation’s resources and the underlying business processes. Undertaking the full audit plan as currently detailed may be ineffective, as the subject of the audit could be in the process of being reengineered and/or new workflows being established within the upgraded system.
This is further reinforced in a review of the Internal Audit Log, which highlights six (6) actions being dependent on the single business platform being implemented.
In addition, given the findings of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) audits, it is recognised that extra resources need to be allocated to improving this area of performance, together with the establishment of an overall Risk Management Framework.
Accordingly, it is proposed to only undertake those audits that are considered highest risk and will not be significantly impacted by changes to workflows and business processes brought about by the single platform project. These audits in order of priority are:
Subject |
Scheduled Hours |
Proposed Hours |
Infrastructure Maintenance |
100 |
200 |
Investments |
50 |
50 |
Human Resources (excluding OSH) |
100 |
50 |
Reserves |
50 |
50 |
Preparation & Attendance – EMT |
40 |
20 |
Quarterly follow-up |
80 |
80 |
Total |
420 |
450 |
The savings from the Internal Audit budget estimated at $70,000 will then be available to redirect towards providing the necessary funding and resources to achieve a positive OSH outcome in line with the management recommendations in the OSH Audits.
As OSH is currently the most significant risk issue facing the City, it is believed appropriate to focus the organisation’s resources on reducing this risk.
Further, it is also recommended that the opportunity be taken to undertake a review into the City’s Internal Audit activity. This should include going back to first principles and identifying the intent of internal audit, the various roles of all stakeholders and lines of communication between each (Audit Committee, CEO, Auditors) and types of risk assessments that will guide the development of internal audit plans. Whilst the Western Australian Department of Local Government has released guidelines dealing with the Internal Audit function, they are relatively brief and simplistic. The NSW Department has released a more comprehensive guidance paper, taking an enterprise risk management approach, that advocates the adoption of an Internal Audit Charter. This approach is considered reflective of the needs of a City the size and complexity of the City of Wanneroo. This Charter will be addressed by separate report.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
In accordance with the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021 and meets the following Outcome Objective –
“Objective 4.7 – Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The 2009/10 Operating Budget has a $120,000 provision for Internal Audits. In accordance with the recommendations of this report, it is proposed that a modified audit plan will release approximately $70,000 to be reallocated to provide additional funding towards the City’s OSH program. Additionally, our Brokers (LGIS) have paid an amount of $35,000 to us for use in the OSH area. A further $35,000 will also be available later this financial year. This combines to a total of $140,000 additional to the existing budget for use as required to accelerate our OSH program.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Audit Committee Recommendation – 10/11/09
That Council:-
1. APPROVES a modification and reduction to the Strategic Audit Plan to undertake the following audits during 2009/10 –
Subject |
Scheduled Hours |
Proposed Hours |
Accounts Payable |
100 |
|
Reserve Funds |
50 |
50 |
Investments/Financial Viability |
50 |
50 |
Human Resources (include Occupational Safety and Health) |
100 |
50* |
Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery |
50 |
|
Corporate Governance & Performance |
200 |
|
Rangers & Library Services |
50 |
|
Management of Building & Development Applications |
100 |
|
Infrastructure Maintenance |
100 |
200 |
Preparation & Attendance – EMT |
40 |
20 |
Quarterly follow-up |
80 |
80 |
Asset Management |
100 |
|
Emergency Management |
50 |
|
Optimisation of Council Facilities |
50 |
|
Capital Works |
100 |
|
Total |
1220 |
450 |
*Excluding Occupational Safety and Health
2. NOTES that the savings in the 2009/10 Internal Audit Budget will be reallocated to provide additional funding and resources to address a range of Occupational Safety and Health issues recommended in recent Occupational Safety and Health Audits; and
3. REQUIRES quarterly updates on the progress of the implementation of the risk management framework.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S13/0002V23
File Name: AA Financial Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 October 2009.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Scott Paulsen
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 4
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statements for the period ended 31 October 2009.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration has opted to present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and in a similar format to that presented in the 2009/2010 Annual Budget. This format separates Revenue and Expenses from Other Revenue and Expenses and provides improved disclosure of City’s underlying Operating Result.
The Financial Activity Statement is in the form of an Income Statement, which compares year to date actual income and expenses with the year to date budget, shows variances and the adopted and revised budgets (if any). It is accompanied by a Balance Sheet together with information relating to Capital Projects, an Investment Portfolio Summary, Statement of Net Current Assets and Rate Setting Statement.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2009/2010 financial year Council has adopted 10% for the reporting of variances, which is in line with previous years.
Detail
Financial Activity Statement and year to date financial performances of the City are detailed in the Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Consultation
Nil
Comments
The following comments are provided on the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 October 2009:-
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Net Result $ million
Year to Date Actual 54.196
Year to Date Budget 53.531
Year to Date Variance 0.664 (+1%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 13.331
Full Year Revised Budget 13.331
The following information is provided on key aspects of the year to date financial results: -
Revenues $ million
Year to Date Actual 81.707
Year to Date Budget 85.323
Year to Date Variance -3.616 (-4%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 110.341
Full Year Revised Budget 110.341
Rates
The City’s annual Rating Income represents 66.6% of the operational income for the City and has been raised through the accounts in August. The total amount initially raised is $71.802 million, with a budget of $1.549 million in Interim Rates estimated to be received throughout the year. Rates levied are inclusive of the Domestic Rubbish Charge ($290) for Residential Improved properties.
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
Under the Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions area $0.914 million has been receipted to the end of October, representing a -69% (-$2.061 million) variance. This is mainly due to the first quarterly instalment from the Grants Commission, in the amount of $1.076 million, being received in June instead of July as budgeted, which will be amended during the mid-year review. $1.150 million of recently received grant funding from the Department of Health and Community Care will be recorded in November.
Fees and Charges
With $6.195 million received year to date a –22% variance is shown, due mainly to timing differences and seasonal demand of services.
Other Revenue
Year to date actual amounts to $0.996 million, which is –9% (-$0.104 million) below budget. This is mainly due to timing difference particularly in regards to the invoicing of external parties.
Expenses $ million
Year to Date Actual -32.822
Year to Date Budget -37.320
Year to Date Variance 4.498 (+12%)
Full Year Adopted Budget -113.596
Full Year Revised Budget -113.596
Employee Costs
Employee Costs, which represents approximately 42% of the full year budgeted expenses, are below budget by $1.507 million (+10%) as at October month end. The main factors effecting this favourable variance are the pay cycle and vacancies within some areas. It is expected that over the course of the financial year this variance will be minimal.
Materials and Contracts
Materials and Contracts costs are well under the year to date budget estimates to the value of $2.556 million (+22%). At this early stage of the year expenditures in this area are generally slow to begin with but is still estimated to meet its targets by year-end.
Utility Charges (electricity, gas, water etc)
Utilities are currently under budget to the value of $0.562 million (+48%), which is primarily due to the timing of the payments.
Insurance
As at October month-end Insurance expenses exceed budget by 12% ($0.108 million), which is due to the annual premiums now being fully paid and slightly higher than expected. A budget reallocation will be sought at the mid-year budget review.
Other Revenue and Expenses $ million
(Excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Year to Date Actual 5.311
Year to Date Budget -1.138
Year to Date Variance 6.449 (+567%)
Full Year Adopted Budget -3.415
Full Year Revised Budget -3.445
Town Planning Schemes (TPS)
With Town Planning Schemes (TPS), it is difficult to forecast when and how much contribution will be received throughout the year. By 31 October, the amount received by the City including interest earned on TPS reserves was $1.592 million, which is 75% below budget.
At this early stage of the year expenses to the value of $0.246 million have been recorded year to date, which is 98% below budget.
Contributions of Physical Assets $ million
Year to Date Actual 0.000
Year to Date Budget 6.667
Year to Date Variance -6.667 (-100%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 20.000
Full Year Revised Budget 20.000
With regard to Physical Assets Contributed by Developers, the City has not recognised any values to October month end. It is expected for these amounts to be advised and accordingly accounted for towards the end of the financial year.
Balance Sheet (Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Projects
The current status of the Capital Projects as of 31 October 2009 is summarised below, by Program Category: -
Capital Program Category |
End of Year Current Budget |
Year to Date Actual |
Description |
$ million |
$ million |
Community |
9.270 |
3.109 |
Conservation |
0.000 |
0.001 |
Corporate |
6.315 |
0.699 |
Drainage |
0.681 |
0.124 |
Investment |
9.227 |
0.000 |
Recreation and Sport |
8.063 |
0.797 |
Transport |
34.629 |
2.501 |
Waste Management |
4.917 |
0.865 |
Total |
73.103 |
8.096 |
It should be noted that the year to date actual expenditure relates to the cash position and does not include commitments.
To further expand on the Capital Program information above, key projects have been selected to be reported on, on a regular basis, which are listed in the table below: -
|
End of Year Current Budget |
Year to Date Actual |
|
Project Description |
$ million |
$ million |
Comment |
Develop Industrial Estate - Neerabup |
8.044 |
0.100 |
Held up due to environmental issues |
CCTV Implementation Strategy |
0.636 |
0.007 |
Out to tender |
Wanneroo Library & Cultural Centre |
4.198 |
2.700 |
Project complete – final payments to be made |
Aquamotion Upgrade |
0.450 |
0.039 |
Final stages progressing |
Jimbub Swamp Ashby – Sports Oval |
0.790 |
0.000 |
Limited progress to date due to availability of a water licence |
Kingsway Netball Facility Upgrade |
3.263 |
0.065 |
Works in progress |
Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubrooms Reconstruction |
1.376 |
0.004 |
Concept plan approved – design being progressed |
Ocean Drive Quinns Reconstruction |
2.327 |
1.243 |
Works in progress |
Mirrabooka Ave Landsdale |
6.024 |
0.001 |
Design 85% complete |
Hartman Drive Madeley |
4.844 |
0.011 |
Tender awarded – to commence onsite Nov |
Flynn Drive Neerabup |
3.226 |
0.000 |
Delayed due to environmental approval and land acquisition issues |
Joondalup Drive Banksia Grove |
1.800 |
0.000 |
Design commenced |
Pinjar Road Ashby |
3.850 |
0.053 |
Design 95% complete |
Ocean Reef Road Wangara |
5.178 |
0.067 |
Delayed due to environmental approval and land acquisition issues |
Wangara MRF Extensions |
0.561 |
0.385 |
Works close to completion |
Investment Portfolio Summary (Refer to Attachment 3)
Administration has maintained a conservative investment strategy with 100% capital protection as a prime objective. Global economic activity and financial market movements have been monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure the City professionally and competently performs a responsible and prudent investment strategy.
As at 31 October 2009, the City holds an investment portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $174,083,624. The current yield for the portfolio is 5.01% annualised while benchmark return reflects 3.05% (UBS Warburg AUD Bank Bill Index).
The City purchased numerous government guaranteed bonds amounting to $55.1 million early this year. These investments provide a steady fixed income stream for the coming five (5) years with a 4.78% average yield. Capital is fully guaranteed by the Commonwealth without the requirement of paying an extra levy.
Net Current Assets
The current composition of the Net Current Assets for the City is outlined below: -
Year to Date Original Revised
Actual Budget Budget
$ million $ million $ million
Current Assets
Cash & Cash Equivalents – Unrestricted 57.563 10.071 10.071
Cash & Cash Equivalents - Restricted 125.002 79.381 79.381
Receivables 39.488 7.130 7.130
Inventories 0.311 0.326 0.326
222.365 96.908 96.908
Current Liabilities
Payables and Provisions -27.097 -18.755 -18.755
Net Current Assets 195.267 78.153 78.153
Plus: Leave Provision Cash Backed 0.000 0.950 0.950
Less Cash & Cash Equivalents – Restricted -125.002 -79.381 -79.381
Estimated Surplus/(Deficiency) c/fwd 70.265 -0.278 -0.278
Rate Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4 represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
Overall Comment:
Both the Operating Result and Capital Works Program are progressing as expected for this point of the financial year. A more thorough review of all accounts is planned for the upcoming Mid-Year Review, to be undertaken as at December month-end and reported to Council at its second meeting of the calendar year, being on 9 March 2010. Adjustments endorsed will be added to the Adopted Budget to form the Revised Budget.
Statutory Compliance
The monthly financial report for the period ended 31 October 2009 complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
Outcome 4 – Governance – “Leadership and Community engagement to ensure the best use of our physical, financial and human resources”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statements for the period ended 31 October 2009.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 2
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 3
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3 of 3
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 4
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
Governance & Executive Services
File Ref: S09/0056V03
File Name: CA Review of Delegated Authority Register.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Robyn Harkins
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider amendments to the City’s Delegated Authority Register adopted in December 2008 following a review as required by the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act).
Background
The Act provides for the delegation of certain powers and duties to the Chief Executive Officer (Sections 5.42 and 5.43). The Chief Executive Officer may, unless prohibited by Council’s instrument of delegation, further on-delegate powers and duties to employees (Section 5.44).
The Act also provides for a delegations register to be maintained and reviewed on an annual basis (Section 5.46). The purpose of delegating authority to the Chief Executive Officer is to provide for the efficient administration of the day to day functions of the Local Government.
In December 2008, a consultant was contracted to undertake a thorough review of all delegations to provide for a more concise and less complex document and to ensure that legislative requirements were being met. In July 2009 administrative amendments were made to ensure all position titles and placements were in line with the City’s new structure adopted in July 2009.
Detail
It is necessary to review all current delegations to ensure that they are consistent with the legislation and applicable to current needs. Although the provisions of the Act do not affect delegations made under other legislation, it is considered appropriate to review those delegations at the same time.
Council’s approval of the reviewed Delegated Authority Register is sought. Additions and deletions to delegations have been shown in track changes and in particular Delegations 7.7 to 7.11 have been added addressing various issues under the Strata Titles Act 1985 and Bush Fires Act 1954.
Consultation
The Register has been through a comprehensive staff review to determine its compatibility with the efficient and effective operations of the City.
Comment
Section 5.42 of the Act gives power to a Council to delegate to the CEO the exercise of its powers and functions; prescribes those functions and powers which cannot be delegated; allows for a CEO to further delegate to an employee of the City and states that the CEO is to keep a register of delegations. The delegations are to be reviewed at least once each financial year by the Council and the person exercising a delegated power is to keep appropriate records.
Disclosure of Interest provisions relating to the City’s Code of Conduct, “Section 2.12 - Disclosure of Interest Affecting Impartiality”, apply to all officers making decisions under delegated authority. Where an employee has delegated authority or involvement in a decision making process that involves an interest for the employee this interest must be declared.
Statutory Compliance
The Act allows Council to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the majority of its powers as detailed below:
“5.42 (1) A local government may delegate* to the CEO the exercise of any of its powers or the discharge of any of its duties under this Act other than those referred to in section 5.43.
* Absolute Majority required.”
Section 5.43 states:
“5.43 A local government cannot delegate to a CEO any of the following powers or duties –
(a) any power or duty that requires a decision of an absolute majority or a 75% majority of the local government;
(b) accepting a tender which exceeds an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(c ) appointing an auditor;
(d) acquiring or disposing of any property valued at an amount exceeding an amount determined by the local government for the purpose of this paragraph;
(e) any of the local government’s powers under section 5.98, 5.98A, 5.99, 5.99A or 5.100;
(f) borrowing money on behalf of the local government;
(g) hearing or determining an objection of a kind referred to in section 9.5;
(ha) the power under section 9.49A(4) to authorise a person to sign documents on behalf of the local government;
(h) any power or duty that requires the approval of the Minister or the Governor; or
(i) such other powers or duties as may be prescribed.”
Section 5.44 states:
“5.44. (1) A CEO may delegate to any employee of the local government the exercise of any of the CEO’s powers or the discharge of any of the CEO’s duties under this Act other than this power of delegation.
(2) A delegation under this section is to be in writing and may be general or as otherwise provided in the instrument of delegation.
(3) This section extends to a power or duty the exercise or discharge of which has been delegated by a local government to the CEO under section 5.42, but in the case of such a power or duty —
(a) the CEO’s power under this section to delegate the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty; and
(b) the exercise of that power or the discharge of that duty by the CEO’s delegate,
are subject to any conditions imposed by the local government on its delegation to the CEO.
(4) Subsection (3)(b) does not limit the CEO’s power to impose conditions or further conditions on a delegation under this section.
(5) In subsections (3) and (4) —
“conditions” includes qualifications, limitations or exceptions.”
Section 5.46 (2) states:
“At least once every financial year, delegations made under this Division are to be reviewed by the delegator.”
Strategic Implications
The review of the Delegated Authority Register is
consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan
2006-2021:
“Outcome 4 – Governance
4.7 Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Policy Implications
A number of Council policies adopted by Council have enabling delegation to the Chief Executive Officer who in turn may on delegate to other appointed officers.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. CONSIDER the review conducted by the Chief Executive Officer on the Delegated Authority Register; and
2. DELEGATE by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY all Instruments of Delegations as detailed in the Delegated Authority Register.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S09/0138V02
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Robyn Harkins
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
File Name: CA City of Wanneroo Private Property Amendment Local Law 2009.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider amending the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001 as a result of a directive received from the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (JSCDL).
Background
Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 10 February 2009 resolved to adopt the Private Property Amendment Local Law 2008 as part of its 8 Year Local Review. Sections 3.16 and 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) were applied incorporating state wide and local public notice and inviting submissions from the public. In accordance with the Act, the local law was gazetted on 9 April 2009.
On 9 June 2009 Council received advice from the JSCDL expressing concern over the new clause 10.1 dealing with parking and the storage of non-commercial vehicles and noted the local law did not contain a definition of the term “rear set-back”.
On 23 June 2009 Council received a further letter from JSCDL requesting clarification on the meaning of “parked or stored” in the proposed new clause 10.1 in respect to the distinction between parking a vehicle and storing a vehicle.
The City’s response to the above communications explained that clause 10.1 was intended to supplement the local law by clarifying the requirements and limitations for parking of vehicles in residential areas and would seek to progress an amendment.
On 17 August 2009 the JSCDL accepted the City’s written undertaking that it would not enforce the local law in a manner inconsistent with the proposed amendment.
The draft City of Wanneroo Private Property Amendment Local Law 2009 was presented to Council on 13 October 2009, Report CS02-10/09, and subsequently advertised for the statutory 42 day period to enable public comment in accordance with S3.12 of the Act
Detail
Clause 10.1 in the current local law states:-
“10.1 Parking and storage of non-commercial vehicles generally
(a) Only vehicles which are operational and registered for on-road use may be parked or stored in the front set-back of residential properties;
(b) Any vehicle which is not operational and road registered may only be stored within a garage, or in the rear set-back, screened so as not to be visible from beyond the property boundaries. The use of vehicle covers within the front set-back does not qualify as screening under this clause; and
(c) Any vehicle, whether road registered or not, which is longer than 10 metres, wider than 2.5 metres or higher than 3 metres, may not be stored at a residential lot.”
The proposed new clause 10.1 and inclusion of the definition of “stored” is as follows:
1. “stored” in relation to disused motor vehicles includes storing, parking or keeping of disused motor vehicles;
2. 10.1 Storage of disused motor vehicles
(1) Only motor vehicles which are operational and registered for on-road use may be stored in the front set-back of properties.
(2) Only one motor vehicle which is not operational and road registered may be stored on a residential lot, either within a garage, or in the fenced rear yard, and screened so as to not be visible from beyond the property boundaries.
(3) The use of vehicle covers within the front set-back does not qualify as screening the vehicle from visibility beyond the property boundaries.
(4) Any motor vehicle, whether road registered or not, which is longer than 10 metres, wider than 2.5 metres or higher than 3 metres, may not be stored at a residential lot.
Consultation
The statutory advertising period closed on 10 December 2009. At the close of advertising no submissions have been received.
Comment
The purpose and effect of the amendment local law as required by the Act is:
Purpose
The purpose of the amendment is to make minor amendments as requested by the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation.
Effect
The effect of the amendment ensures clarity to the conditions of the local law for the storage of disused motor vehicles on private property.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 3 – Functions of local governments
Division 2 – Legislative functions of local governments
Subdivision 2 – Local laws made under any Act
s3.12 – Procedure for making local laws
The amendment has been revised in accordance with the JSCDL’s directive.
Strategic Implications
City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021
Objective 4.7 - “Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Strategy 4.7.2 - “Ensure compliance with relevant statutory authorities.”
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Costs will be incurred with respect to the advertising and eventual publication in the Government Gazette of the amendment local law.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, in accordance with Section 3.12 of the Local Government Act 1995, ADOPTS the City of Wanneroo Private Property Amendment Local Law 2009, detailed hereunder:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995
CITY OF WANNEROO
PRIVATE PROPERTY AMENDMENT LOCAL LAW 2009
Under the powers conferred by the Local Government Act 1995 and under all other powers enabling it, the Council of the City of Wanneroo resolved on [insert date] to make the following local law.
1. Citation
This local law may be cited as the City of Wanneroo Private Property Amendment Local Law 2009.
2. Commencement
This local law comes into operation 14 days after the date of its publication in the Government Gazette.
3. Principal local law
In this local law, the City of Wanneroo Private Property Local Law 2001 as published in the Government Gazette on 30 April 2002, and as amended published in the Government Gazette on 9 April 2009, is referred to as the principal local law. The principal local law is amended as follows.
4. Clause 1.6 amended
After the definition for “state of disrepair” insert –
“stored” in relation to disused motor vehicles includes storing, parking or keeping of disused motor vehicles;”
5. Clause 10.1 amended
Delete clause 10.1 and its heading and insert -
“10.1 Storage of disused motor vehicles
(1) Only motor vehicles which are operational and registered for on-road use may be stored in the front set-back of properties.
(2) Only one motor vehicle which is not operational and road registered may be stored on a residential lot, either within a garage, or in the fenced rear yard, and screened so as to not be visible from beyond the property boundaries.
(3) The use of vehicle covers within the front set-back does not qualify as screening the vehicle from visibility beyond the property boundaries.
(4) Any motor vehicle, whether road registered or not, which is longer than 10 metres, wider than 2.5 metres or higher than 3 metres, may not be stored at a residential lot.”
_____________
Dated: 2009.
The Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo was hereunto affixed by authority of a resolution of Council in the presence of:-
JON KELLY, Mayor.
DANIEL SIMMS, Chief Executive Officer.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S07/0057
File Name: CA Donations to be Considered by Council.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Sue Daymond
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider a request for a waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for waiver of fees, the City’s Policy specifies that:
“A one-off 50% waiver of fees (covering one financial year) may be provided to not-for-profit groups hiring Council facilities. This will be available to groups as short-term support.”
A waiver of fees will only be considered for the current financial year, and only for the period from the date the application is received until 30 June.
Detail
During this period, the City has received one request for waiver of fees, which is summarised as follows. The application has been included in an attachment to this report (Attachment 1).
Comment
Applicant 1 – Quinns Rocks Cricket Club |
|
Request amount |
$2272.50 |
Description of request |
50% waiver of fees for hire of Anthony Waring Clubrooms |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation |
Nil |
Status of applicant organisation |
Not-for-profit community group |
Exclusivity of the event or project |
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
This request supports Objective 2.2 of Council’s Strategic Plan being “Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.” |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Not specified |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
N/A |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
50% waiver of fees October 08-March 09 for $1891.55 GS 02-12/08 |
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Not specified |
Comments |
The City’s policy includes the following assessment criterion: “A one-off 50% waiver of fees (covering one financial year) may be provided to not-for-profit groups hiring Council facilities. This will be available to groups as short-term support.”
As this club received a 50% waiver of fees in the 2008/2009 financial year they are not eligible for a further waiver of fees. |
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a waiver of fees for the sum of $2272.50 to Quinns Rocks Cricket Club relating to hire of the Anthony Waring Clubrooms for the period from October 2009 to March 2010 as it does not comply with the City’s Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The provision of donations is aligned with the City’s strategic direction as follows:
“2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.
2.2.1 Encourage, support and provide a range of recreation and leisure opportunities, both active and passive.”
Policy Implications
City of Wanneroo Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy
Clause 4.3.1 states as follows:
“Assessment criterion will include:…
· At least 75% of membership of groups requesting support must be City of Wanneroo residents…”
Financial Implications
Budget 2009/2010 |
$45,425.00 |
Amount expended to date: · Under delegated authority: · By Council determination |
$12,686.00 $17,643.55 |
Total of requests this period (Recommended): · Sponsorships · Donations & Waiver of Fees and Charges |
$15,095.45
$0 $0 |
Remaining Funds (if request under consideration is approved) |
$15,095.45 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council NOT APPROVE a waiver of fees for the sum of $2272.50 to Quinns Rocks Cricket Club relating to hire of the Anthony Waring Clubrooms for the period from October 2009 to March 2010 as it does not comply with the City’s Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P22/0418V04
File Name: DA Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Renewal of Long Stay Tenancy Agreements Sites 46 60.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Murray Sparks
Meeting Date: 15/12/09
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider renewing the ‘site only’ long-stay tenancy agreements for Sites 46 and 60 at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park for six months from 16 December 2009 at a rental of $140.00 per week.
Background
The Quinns Rocks Caravan Park (the Park) is located on a portion of the City’s freehold Lot 211, Quinns Road, Mindarie contained in Certificate of Title Volume 485 Folio 181A being an area of approximately 2.1 hectares and zoned ‘Parks and Recreation’.
The Park, which is under management on behalf of the City, comprises an office and residence, ablution block and laundry, BBQ area, 59 powered sites and a small un-powered area at the rear of the Park. Currently the powered sites are utilised as follows:
§ 34 Casual : fees charged in accordance with the City’s Fees and Charges Schedule for use by casual/holiday users.
§ 4 Semi-permanent : caravans privately owned but not occupied as principle place of residence, charged a negotiated weekly rent regardless of occupation.
§ 19 leases : very long-term residential tenancy agreements (leases) commenced 1 October 2002 and expiring 31 August 2012, charged rent in accordance with their lease agreements.
§ 2 Long-stay : sites that have been occupied as residential premises for longer than 3 months from the introduction of the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006, ie Sites 46 & 60, charged rent in accordance with their tenancy agreements (Attachment 1 refers).
Reports have previously been presented to Council in relation to sites 46 & 60 seeking approval to enter into short-term fixed (site only) tenancy arrangements (CS04-09/08 and CS05-04/09 refer).
Detail
The occupants of Site 46 and 60 have been living at the caravan park since May 2007 and December 2006 respectively and are caught under the provisions of the relatively new long-stay legislation under which formal tenancy agreements are required. Discussions with the occupants have revealed their preference to remain at the park until they are required to move and in the short-term there is no urgency for the occupants to leave as they do not occupy prime sites within the Park that could be used for casual/holiday use.
The balance of permanent residents to the number of sites available at the Park for casual or holiday use is well within Council’s required percentage of a maximum of 60% of sites for permanents (CS09-04/02 refers). The current percentage of permanent sites at the Park stands at 42%.
The agreements for Sites 46 and 60 expired on 30 September 2009 however the occupants continue to pay the current rent of $140.00 per week, which was set at the commencement on 1 April 2009. In addition the occupants pay for all power used at the respective sites and no issues associated with their occupancy have been experienced to date.
It is therefore proposed that new long-stay tenancy, fixed term (site only) agreements be entered into for sites 46 & 60 for a term of six (6) months commencing 16 December 2009 at a rental of $140.00 per week (GST inclusive), plus power.
Comment
With the medium to long-term future of the Park subject to further and more comprehensive evaluation the renewal of these short-term tenancy agreements is considered appropriate and the entering into further agreements is supported. It is proposed that should the agreements be extended beyond that time that the weekly rent would be adjusted accordingly.
Statutory Compliance
The long-stay agreements for Sites 46 & 60 are in compliance with the requirements of the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
The long-stay tenancy arrangements have been negotiated and are in accordance with the City’s tenancy Policy in relation to residential tenancies.
Financial Implications
The tenancy arrangements will result in an income stream to the City of $7,280 over the next six (6) months.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the renewal of the site only long-stay tenancy agreements for Sites 46 and 60 at the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park for a fixed term of six (6) months commencing 16 December 2009 in accordance with the Residential Parks (Long-stay Tenants) Act 2006; and
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to and execute the long-stay tenancy agreements between the city and the occupant of Site 46 and Site 60.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: P23/0010V02
File Name: DA Support for Relocation of Whitford and Districts Model Aircraft Club Lot 4 Neerabup.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Murray Sparks
Meeting Date: 15/12/09
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider providing support to the relocation of the Whitford and Districts Model Aircraft Club.
Background
The Whitford and Districts Model Aircraft Club Inc (the Club) has occupied a portion of Lot 2002 (formerly known as Lot 4), Neerabup situated directly South of Barbagallo Raceway under a Licence Agreement dated 1 August 1983 with a Licence Fee of $50. Whilst the agreement was for only twelve months it has effectively been rolled over on an annual basis until the club relocated to its new location earlier this year.
The Licence provided the Club the right to enter upon the land for the purpose ‘Flying Model Aeroplanes’ together with the right of carriageway over portion of the adjoining Crown Reserve (Barbagallo Raceway) for access to the site.
In 1993 Council considered a proposal to lease the site to the Club but on the recommendation of the Town Clerk at the time resolved to advise the Club that it was premature to consider a lease and that the Club’s application would be considered during the preparation of a district structure plan as part of a future land allocation strategy for the Pinjar motor sports area.
A lease was not considered again until 2003 when the City wrote to the Club advising that it was proposing to introduce a new lease policy and that, since there were no short term plans for the site, a new lease arrangement for a term of 3 to 5 years would be considered at a nominal rental, subject to Council approval. The City’s Tenancy Policy was subsequently adopted by Council in April 2004.
Lease discussions were put on hold due to the possible future use of the land as detailed in the Neerabup Industrial Area Structure Plan No 17, which was adopted in January 2005. As a result a meeting was held with the Club and the issues were discussed and the parties agreed that the Club’s tenure at its current location would be limited.
On that basis it was suggested that the Club might instigate discussions with a view to joining the Wanneroo Aeromodellers club that operates from their own leased area off nearby Perry Road. Whilst there were some reservations on both sides, the Club’s members joined the Wanneroo Aeromodellers Club in July 2005. Unfortunately the integration failed and in 2006 the Club reverted back to the City’s site at Neerabup.
The Club, in conjunction with the sports state body (Aeromodellers WA) continued its search for alternate premises, as there was no available City land, and has been able to secure a lease direct with DPI at Nisa Road, Pinjar which is a few kilometres north of the Neerabup site. That lease arrangement commenced 1 January 2009.
At no stage had City officers discussed or agreed to any contribution to the Club’s expenses as part of the relocation process albeit that the Club had, at various times suggested that the City should contribute.
Detail
In March of this year the President of the Club contacted the City seeking a meeting to discuss the possibility of a contribution from the City to replace the bitumen runways as the Club will need to construct new ones as part of the relocation. The Club was requested to prepare a formal submission detailing what is required and provide appropriate cost estimates.
The formal submission was received under cover of a letter dated 28 August 2009 seeking a contribution from the City to the value of $33,580.56 (excluding GST) by undertaking the asphalting of one of the new runways, being 10 metres wide x 100 metres in length. It was suggested that the City could utilise the services of Roads 2000 to carry out the works under the current contract.
The total cost of developing the two runways if it were carried out by a commercial contractor (ie Roads 2000) is approx $120,890.00 which includes the bulk earthworks, a compacted base course and asphalt seal. The Club is undertaking the works using second hand materials where possible with a large component of the cost being in labour donated by the club members making the actual cost of the project much cheaper. In addition, all costs associated with the relocation of existing infrastructure from the Neerabup site are also being absorbed by the Club.
In a recent discussion with the Club President it was revealed that the Club has already constructed a 660 metre access road to the new site and are preparing the runway areas for 100mm of limestone with 50mm of profile however are reluctant to proceed until a response is received from the City. Currently the runways are mowed grass, which is less than satisfactory.
Comment
The Club comprises a relatively small membership base of approximately 20 members, with the majority of those not living within the City of Wanneroo, and has enjoyed over 25 years of use of the City’s land at an annual fee of only $50. There is no legal obligation on the City to fund any relocation expenses and on that basis; Administration recommends that no direct financial or ‘in kind’ support should be provided.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council DECLINES the request from the Whitfords and Districts Model Aircraft Club to provide support, either financial or otherwise, to the costs of relocating from Lot 2002, Neerabup to the Club’s new site in Nisa Road, Pinjar.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
ATTACHMENT 1
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S09/0126V01
Responsible Officer: A/Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Yvette Heath
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): Nil
File Name: A Delegation of Authority over the Council Recess.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider an increase in the delegated authority provided to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders for the Christmas/ New Year period for any tenders that are above the current delegation limit of $250,000.
Detail
The December Ordinary Council meeting is scheduled for 15 December 2009 and the next meeting will be on 09 February 2010. Should a decision be required during this period that does not require an Absolute or Special Majority under the Local Government Act 1995, or any other act empowering the local government, under delegation 2.5 in the Delegated Authority Register, the Chief Executive Officer is able to make decisions on behalf of the City during Council recess.
Decisions taken during the recess period will be documented and reported to the first Ordinary Council meeting in 2010.
During this period at least four tenders will close and for operational reasons it would be advantageous to award the tender as soon as possible. It is possible that the value of the tenders, being for the Construction of Additions to the Warradale Community Centre; the Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Gates and Fencing for a Period of Two (2) Years; the Supply and Delivery of Mobile Garbage Bins for a Period of Two (2) Years and the Construction of Two (2) Residential Properties for the Ecovision Wanneroo Project at Lot 1552, 5 Ardea Way, Tapping will exceed the current delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders to a maximum of $250,000.
To facilitate this, it is recommended that Council approve an increase in the authority to award tenders by the Chief Executive Officer during this period.
Comment
This is a common procedure that is provided for in most local governments and has been supported by this Council in previous years.
Statutory Compliance
Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows Council to delegate functions to the Chief Executive Officer. Section 5.43 does not permit Council to delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award a tender above a limit set by Council.
Strategic Implications
Satisfies the following outcome objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006-2021:
“4.7 Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The awarding of any tender will be on the basis that adequate budget provision has been made.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council DELEGATE BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to determine tenders in accordance with the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 (in addition to the current delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to award tenders to a maximum of $250,000) the authority to determine the following tenders up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per tender:-
1. Tender number 09041 – the Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Gates and Fencing for a Period of Two (2) Years;
2. Tender number 09043 – the Construction of Additions to the Warradale Community Centre at 31 Warradale Terrace, Landsdale;
3. Tender number 09036 – the Supply and Delivery of Mobile Garbage Bins for a Period of Two (2) Years; and
4. Proposed tender – the Construction of Two (2) Residential Properties for the Ecovision Wanneroo Project at Lot 1552, 5 Ardea Way, Tapping
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S02/0086V01
File Name: A Freeway Extension to Neerabup Road and connection to Neerabup Industrial area.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Daniel Simms
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachment(s): 1
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider endorsing the joint submission by the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup to the state government in support of the extension of the Mitchell Freeway to Neerabup Road and Neerabup Road Extension from the proposed freeway to Wanneroo Road.
Background
Past strategic plans for the Perth metropolitan region have consistently emphasised the importance of provision of adequate levels of employment opportunities in the growing outer areas of the region, to prevent these areas from becoming ‘dormitory suburbs’.
The Corridor Plan (1970) proposed ‘Sub-Regional Centres’, including Joondalup within the North West Corridor.
The first Structure Plan for the North West Corridor (1977) proposed an employment self sufficiency (ESS) rate for the North West Corridor of 90% i.e. the number of local jobs available would be 90% of the number of workers living in this area.
A revised North West Corridor Structure Plan released in 1992 (and which is still the current Structure Plan for this area) proposed an ESS of 72%. Also, in line with the then Perth region strategic plan (Metroplan 1990), it proposed a significant expansion in the planned size of the Neerabup Industrial Area to be a ‘strategic’ industrial area.
All of the above strategies made it clear that it was very important that these high levels of ESS be achieved, not only to avoid long commuting times for workers, and the social, environmental and economic implications of that, but also to avoid significant failure in the transportation systems through high levels of congestion.
Detail
In terms of the future growth of industrial areas, the Wangara and Landsdale complexes are expected to reach capacity within two or three years. The only remaining industrial area available to meet the demand for industrial land in this corridor is Neerabup. The current demand per annum for industrial floor space at Wangara, Landsdale and Neerabup averaged approximately 54,000m2 per annum between 2002 and 2007. Assuming that this demand remains constant in the corridor, it is likely that by 2012/13, the NIA will need to supply all of this demand. There is potential for the demand for industrial land to increase beyond 2002 – 2007 averages as major planned construction projects begin to come on stream.
The NIA has the potential to significantly contribute to local employment provision. The current industrial zoned area is approximately 1,000 ha in area. While a substantial portion of this is currently subject to a number of constraints limiting development, a substantial additional area for industrial use (of approx. 800 ha) has been proposed just to the east of the NIA (‘South Pinjar’ – see Plan No. 2 to Attachment One).
Consultation
The purpose of the joint Cities’ submission to the state government is to highlight the economic and sustainability outcomes of the extension of the freeway and connection to Neerabup in addition to those benefits associated with reducing traffic congestion caused by both Cities rapid and long term growth.
Comment
The anticipated growth of the NIA after Wangara and Landsdale industrial areas are at capacity is not guaranteed. The NIA will need to ensure that the appropriate infrastructure is in place by 2012/13 to allow businesses to locate to the complex and operate effectively and efficiently. The impact of poor infrastructure provision will be that businesses will choose to locate elsewhere. This may include elsewhere in Western Australia but it may also result in significant loss to other Australian states or overseas locations.
The construction of the extensions to the freeway and Neerabup Road will deliver substantial benefits to the region. It will distribute those benefits widely across the supply chain, and strengthen the regional economic base. It will also improve the infrastructure, which underpins the social, cultural and economic life of the North West Corridor. It will help to ensure that businesses are attracted to the region.
Economic benefits:
· Initial economic impact construction from 2012/13 onwards of $54m per annum with approximately 234 full time direct and indirect construction jobs (based on 1 full time job per $230,000 expenditure – UDIA Western Australia Economic Impact Study, 2007);
· 540 direct jobs per annum generated within the NIA;
· Reduced travel times for private and freight traffic;
· Increase in investment potential in the North West Corridor by the timely provision of accessible infrastructure;
· Links the strategic industrial area of NIA to the City of Joondalup Strategic major business service centre, Balcatta, Osborne Park commercial and industrial areas, and other commercial and industrial areas within the Perth metropolitan area;
· Employees travel by car from all areas of Perth metro to work in industrial areas (Journey to Work data). The freeway will be utilised better in peak times with a considerable proportion of NIA employees travelling north in the morning peak time;
· Businesses reliant on transport links may choose to locate at Neerabup rather than Wangara and Landsdale. This will take the pressure off industrial land prices in Wangara and Landsdale;
· Provision of the freeway and Neerabup Road access ensures that Neerabup is “ready” when completion of subdivision at Wangara and Landsdale occurs in 2 or 3 years time;
· From its inception, the primary intention for Joondalup has been to provide a true city centre that services the entire northwest corridor, providing a commercial, civic, cultural and recreational hub for the region. This intention has remained unaltered through the various incarnations of metropolitan planning, with Joondalup city centre now containing the Joondalup Health Campus, ECU Campus and TAFE campus. The successful development of the NIA will also be important for the successful development of the Joondalup City Centre;
· The proposed freeway extension to Neerabup Road and the Neerabup Road link to the industrial area will greatly improve the connectivity between these important business and employment nodes. With the freeway extension therefore providing important sub-regional benefits and building on 30 years of long term strategic planning of the northwest corridor, which has successfully underpinned the creation of communities and investment in infrastructure;
· It will promote growth of a number of proposed major employment centres further to the north, particularly the proposed Alkimos Town Centre (proposed 7,500 jobs) and the Brighton (Butler) District Centre; and
· The location of the Barbagallo Raceway adjacent to the Neerabup Industrial Area will enable future generation of a cluster of related high-tech automotive industry businesses.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The Vision for the City of Wanneroo is the centre for creative and sustainable growth, delivering strong, vibrant and connected communities. The success of the Neerabup Industrial Area and the generation of upwards of 20,000 jobs in the northwest corridor is a critical factor in achieving this vision.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
State Government support is sought for the following proposals:
· Allocating $20 million in the 2010-2011 budget to fund planning, design and approvals.
· Allocating $90 million in each of the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 Budgets to fund site works and construction.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSE the submission to the State Government in support of the extension of the Mitchell Freeway to Neerabup Road and Neerabup Road Extension (Freeway to Wanneroo Road) as detailed in Attachment One; and
2. REQUEST the State Government allocate the following capital funds:
a) Allocate $20 million in the 2010-2011 budget to fund planning, design and approvals; and
b) Allocate $90 million in each of the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 Budgets to fund site works and construction.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
StartOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 6 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 7 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 8 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 9 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 10 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 11 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 12 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 13 of 15
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 14 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 15 of 15
EndOfAttachment - Do not delete this line will not be printed
File Ref: S24/0023
File Name: A Appointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: A/Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
Author: Daniel Simms
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the appointment of an Acting Chief Executive Officer from 2 July 2010 to 19 July 2010 inclusive.
Background
The Chief Executive Officer is intending to take annual leave between 2 July 2010 to 19 July 2010 inclusive, and Council is required to appoint an Acting Chief Executive Officer during this period.
Detail
Under the Local Government Act (1995), Council is required to appoint both the Chief Executive Officer and any person acting in this position. The Chief Executive Officer requests approval to appoint the Director, Planning and Sustainability Mr Len Kosova, as Acting Chief Executive Officer from 2 July 2010 to 19 July 2010 inclusive.
It is not intended to backfill the position of Director, Planning & Sustainability during the period 2 July 2010 to 19 July 2010 whilst the Director is undertaking the role of Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
The Local Government Act (1995) s5.36 requires that Council appoint the Chief Executive Officer. The Department of Local Government has confirmed that this also extends to the appointment of an Acting Chief Executive Officer.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council APPOINT the Director, Planning and Sustainability, Mr Len Kosova, to the position of Acting Chief Executive Officer for the period 2 July 2010 to 19 July 2010 inclusive.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: S24/0088V01
Responsible Officer: A/Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Daniel Simms
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Attachments: Nil
File Name: AA Acting Director Corporate Strategy Performance.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the appointment of Mr Shane Cable as Acting Director Corporate Strategy & Performance for the period 21 January 2010 to 5 February 2010 inclusive.
Background
The Director Corporate Strategy & Performance has been invited by Civica Pty Limited to present at a Local Government Conference being convened by Civica in Manchester and will be combining the trip with a study tour and short period of annual leave. Accordingly, an Acting Director Corporate Strategy & Performance will need to be appointed during the above period.
Detail
The Study Tour will commence at Civica’s Singapore offices, Library & Learning Division between 21 & 23 January, then head to London & Manchester to visit various local authorities, before participating in the Conference in Manchester on 26 & 27 January. This will be followed be a period of annual leave, with the Director returning to the office on 8 February 2010.
Under the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act), Council is required to endorse the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to appoint senior management and any person acting in the position.
The Chief Executive Officer requests Council appoint Mr Shane Cable as Acting Director Corporate Strategy & Performance for the period 21 January 2010 to 5 February 2010 inclusive.
Comment
Given that the expenses associated with the study tour and conference are to be met by Civica, issues of financial disclosure are raised. Under the Act, contributions to travel (including accommodation expenses) are specifically excluded from the definition of “gift”, however Section 5.83 of the Act specifically addresses the requirement for these contributions to be disclosed in an annual return for the period.
In addition, as there is a business relationship involved, with Civica being a supplier of software to the City, it will be necessary for the Director to record a financial interest in any future dealings (or excuse himself from future decision making processes).
In terms of the Acting Director position, Mr Cable is an experienced Manager and is currently the Manager Information and Business Improvement within the Corporate Strategy & Performance Directorate.
Statutory Compliance
The Local Government Act 1995, S5.3.6 requires that Council appoint the Chief Executive Officer, and this extends to the appointment of Directors. The Department of Local Government has confirmed that the Local Government Act further requires Council to endorse the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to appoint senior employees.
Strategic Implications
Consistent with the City’s 2006-2021 Strategic Plan and meets the following Objective –
“4.7 Maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The expenses associated with the Director’s attendance at the conference will be fully met by Civica, the conference convenor.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES the acceptance of an invitation by the Director Corporate Strategy and Performance from Civica Pty Limited to participate in a study tour and present at a local government Conference in Manchester in January 2010 at the expense of Civica; and
2. ENDORSES the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer to appoint Mr Shane Cable as Acting Director Corporate Strategy & Performance for the period 21 January 2010 to 5 February 2010 inclusive.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Name: AMayor Jon Kelly.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
File Ref: R18/0031V01
Responsible Officer: Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachment(s): Nil
StartStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Issue
To consider the speed zoning to the extension of Hartman Drive between Gnangara Road and Hepburn Avenue and local roads adjacent to Kingsway Christian College.
Background
Hartman Drive is currently being extended south, from Gnangara Road to Hepburn Avenue. The extension includes the construction of a roundabout at the Kingsway intersection.
The Kingsway Christian College (College) is located in the suburb of Darch, on the northeast corner of the Hartman Drive/Kingsway intersection and is bounded by Kingsway to the south, Carripan Road to the east, Westport Parade to the north and Hartman Drive to the west. Local access is currently available to the College from Kingsway, Carripan Road and Westport Parade.
Detail
Hartman Drive is a District Distributor A in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy. The existing constructed section is a 4-lane dual carriageway and runs north/south between Ocean Reef Road and Gnangara Road, Wangara. The extension of Hartman Drive is being constructed as a 2-lane undivided carriageway with provision to become a 4-lane dual carriageway and will divide the suburbs of Madeley and Darch.
The District Planning Scheme No.2 forecasts traffic volumes on the Hartman Drive extension of approximately 15,000 vehicles per day.
The posted speed limit on Hartman Drive is 70km/h, as is Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road; the posted speed limit on Ocean Reef Road is 80km/h. Additionally, 40km/h School Zones are applicable to Kingsway and Carripan Road, adjacent to the College.
The Kingsway Christian College has expressed concern about the speed limit that will apply to the Hartman Drive extension, between Gnangara Road and Hepburn Avenue, as well as revision of 40km/h school zones on the roads bounding the College.
Comment
The setting of a 60km/h speed limit on Hartman Drive, between Gnangara Road and Hepburn Avenue, will improve safety for all road users.
The Hartman Drive extension along with the connection of Westport Parade will provide a complete circuit around the College, significantly improving traffic circulation. To improve pedestrian road safety for students of the College, 40km/h School Zones should also be implemented on Westport Parade and Hartman Drive, adjacent to the College, to complement those already in place on Kingsway and Carripan Road.
EndStrip - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. REQUEST Main Roads WA review the proposed speed zoning for the extension of Hartman Drive from Gnangara Road to Hepburn Avenue with the view to setting the posted speed limit at 60km/h.
2. SUPPORTS Kingsway Christian College application to Main Roads WA for a review of the 40km/h School Zones on the boundary roads to the College, including Hartman Drive between Westport Parade and Kingsway.
3. ADVISE the Kingsway Christian College of Council’s decision
Administration Comment
The reduction in the speed limit for the extension of Hartman Drive from Gnangara Road to Hepburn Avenue from 70km/hr as proposed in the design, to 60km/hr, is supported as it will improve safety along this section of the road, particularly given the proximity of local schools.
Australian Standards (AS 1742.4-1999 Speed Controls) states…...the objective of speed management is to contribute to road safety, mobility and amenity on public roads by providing a credible system of speed limits which are compatible with the speed environment. In addition, AS1742.4 also states…...the speed limit shall not be so low that a significant number of drivers will ignore it. The general requirement for speed management as per AS1742.4 is ….speed limits should be set to maintain a balance between a driver’s reasonable perception of speed environment and an acceptable level of environmental amenity for all road users and abutting land user.
In determining speed limits, MRWA seeks to achieve a good match between road function and road design. As far as possible, major traffic routes are designed to reduce collision risks, so higher speeds can be sustained without unacceptable risk. Main Roads WA considers the need for 40km/h School Zones on application from the School Principal or Parents and Friends/Citizens Association. While the City can support an application, it cannot act on the School’s behalf.
Administration strongly recommends that the Kingsway Christian College set up a School RoadWise Committee. This Committee would initially focus on developing a clear direction within the School community as to traffic management and expected behaviours during school drop-off and pick-up times. In the longer term, the Committee would review safety matters arising and promote road safety awareness. Administration is able to provide initial support and guidance in relation to set of this Committee.
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete
File Ref: R20/0005V01
File Name: SBA Purchase of Part Lot 8 68 Pinjar Road Sinagra for Pinjar Road Reserve.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Author: Ray Faul
Meeting Date: 15 December 2009
Recommendation
THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(iii) a matter that if disclosed, would reveal – information about the business, professional, commercial or financial affairs of a person,
File Ref: S39/1149
File Name: A Policy Payments to Employee in Addition to Contract or Award.doc This line will not be printed dont delete
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Recommendation
THAT Council move into a Confidential Session to discuss this item under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(iii) a matter that if disclosed, would reveal – information about the business, professional, commercial or financial affairs of a person,
EndOfRecommendation - This line will not be printed Please do NOT delete