Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
7.00pm, 23 August, 2011
Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council allows a minimum of 15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding will control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item number should also be stated.
The following general rules apply to question and statement time:
· Questions should only relate to the business of the council and should not be a statement or personal opinion.
· Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
· Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or employees.
· Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
· The first priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
· The second priority will be given to public statements. Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be heard.
Deputations
The Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in writing, at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A request for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the Friday before the Council Meeting.
· A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting.
· Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
· To ensure that there is a process in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
· To emphasise that the reason for recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings of the Council, Electors, Audit Committee and Public Question Time during Council Briefing Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment, except in the case of meetings of the Council where the Council closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause (1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the CD plus staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the State Records Act 2000 (General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records). The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 23 August, 2011 commencing at 7.00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive Officer
18 August, 2011
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 3_____ Public Question Time
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-08/11 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 July 2011
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members
PS01-08/11 Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
PS03-08/11 Amendment No. 18 to East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3
PS04-08/11 Adoption of Draft Lot 204 Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks Local Structure Plan No. 83
CB02-08/11 Application to Keep More Than Two Dogs
IN01-08/11 Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club Facility
IN02-08/11 PT02-10/10 - Parking Prohibitions - Landsdale Primary School
IN03-08/11 MN04-09/10 - Merriwa Primary School - Traffic and Parking Issues
IN04-08/11 2012/2013 State and Federal Nation Building Black Spot Programs
IN06-08/11 City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group Strategic Action Plan 2011/12
IN07-08/11 PT01-06/11 - Palm Corner, Quinns Rocks - Request for Footpath
IN08-08/11 Darch - Review of Traffic Flow Post Extension of Mirrabooka Avenue
CD01-08/11 Deductible Gift Recipient Status Submission for Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre
CD02-08/11 Concept plan for the Development of Kingsway Regional Playground
CD03-08/11 Wanneroo City Soccer Club Floodlighting
Corporate Strategy & Performance
CS01-08/11 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 July 2011
CS02-08/11 Financial Activity Statements (Estimates) for the Period Ended 30 June 2011
Governance and Executive Services
CS03-08/11 Donations to be Considered by Council - August 2011
CS04-08/11 Dedication of Lot 102 (143) Kingsway as Road Reserve for the Hartman Drive Extension
CS05-08/11 Proposed Lease to Wanneroo Community Men's Shed (Inc) - Daisy House, Girrawheen
CS07-08/11 Proposed Lease to the Salvation Army (Western Australia) Property Trust
CS08-08/11 Proposed Development - Community Purpose Site - Lot 19 (213) Kingsway, Darch
CE01-08/11 Donation Requests Considered Under Delegated Authority of the Chief Executive Officer
MN01-08/11 Cr Brett Treby – Girradoola Going Places Christmas Community Celebration - Hallmark Event
CR01-08/11 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex - Stage 2 Contractual Dispute
CR03-08/11 Adoption of Business Plan for the Disposal of Lot 12 Fowey Loop, Mindarie
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting
Agenda
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 July 2011 be confirmed.
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.
File Ref: 5134 – 11/91540
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider advertising of draft Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre (LPP 5.2) included as Attachment 1.
Background
At its meeting on 20 July 2010, the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group recommended to Council:
“That the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group: -
1. NOTES the Wanneroo Town Centre Precinct update;
2. DEFERS making a recommendation to Council that the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group be disbanded until a later stage, as making such a decision is currently premature; and
3. NOTES the Director Planning and Sustainability will workshop a draft Policy for future development guidelines within the Town Centre with the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group, prior to presenting that Policy to Council for formal consideration.”
Administration has prepared LPP 5.2, which was workshopped with the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group on 12 July 2011, and presented to Council Forum on 9 August 2011.
In preparing the draft Policy, Administration considered and incorporated the previous community consultation and visioning work undertaken in 2006 by the City and The Planning Group (TPG) as part of the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan Review. Key themes relating to the development of the Town Centre that were identified during the community consultation and visioning work and which have been reflected in LPP 5.2 include accessibility and connectivity, marketing and promotion, economic and urban development, and community services.
LPP 5.2 establishes the desired land use pattern and form of future urban development within the Wanneroo Town Centre and reinforces its status as a Secondary Centre as identified in State Planning Policy 4.2: Activity Centres for Perth and Peel. LPP 5.2 will facilitate the provision of higher density residential development in proximity to both existing and future retail and community services infrastructure and employment opportunities.
In preparing LPP 5.2, Administration engaged Mackay Urban Design in August 2010 (with funding remaining from the Wanneroo Town Centre Revitalisation Project) to prepare concept plans, perspective sketches, precinct plans, and detailed drawings relating to urban design elements to illustrate the intent of draft provisions for inclusion in the draft Policy.
Detail
LPP 5.2 is made up of two parts. Part 1 of LPP 5.2, Policy Operation, defines the boundary of the Wanneroo Town Centre Policy area, and sets out the purpose and objectives of the draft Policy.
The Policy area is currently subject to Structure Plan No. 23: Wanneroo Town Centre (May 2001). The draft Policy expands and elaborates on the existing Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan provisions by applying greater control and influence over development outcomes and the quality of built form in the Town Centre, than would otherwise be achievable through the Structure Plan alone. However, LPP 5.2 applies to a smaller geographic area than that identified in Structure Plan No. 23. This is because LPP 5.3 excludes the Ingham’s Poultry Farm to the north due as the existing buffer for this site presents a constraint to its development, and the Wanneroo Primary School and Wanneroo Showgrounds to the east as these areas are already established.
The Policy objectives have been derived from work completed as part of the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan Review undertaken by TPG in 2008, and have been set in line with State Planning Policy 4.2: Activity Centres for Perth and Peel. Part 1 also includes a long term vision and perspective drawings as graphical representations of possible scenarios of the form and nature of development in the Wanneroo Town Centre once the Policy objectives have been achieved.
Part 2 of LPP 5.2, Policy Provisions, establishes a clear and consistent framework for the assessment and determination of development and subdivision applications within the Town Centre, where no such framework currently exists. LPP 5.2 sets out positions relating to various design elements (land use, built form, building placement, street interface, connectivity, car parking and landscaping) which are directed to producing high standards of development and quality built form in the Town Centre. LPP 5.2 prescribes and illustrates acceptable and unacceptable standards that applications for planning approval will be assessed against in order to determine whether the policy positions are met.
LPP 5.2 provides additional guidance to applications that fall within three precincts in the Town Centre being identified as the Department of Environment and Conservation site on the corner of Dundebar Road and Wanneroo Road, Department of Education site on Shaw Road, and the lots enclosed by Dundebar Road, Conlan Avenue and Rocca Way. These precincts have been identified as requiring additional detailed planning to achieve preferred land uses, vehicular and pedestrian connections, lot layouts, vegetation retention, car park locations, minimum setbacks and architectural landmark features.
Consultation
LPP 5.2 was presented to the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group on 12 July 2011 to workshop the draft Policy prior to it being presented to Council Forum on 9 August 2011.
At its meeting on 12 July 2011, the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group endorsed:
“Draft Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre, included as Attachment 1, for the purpose of presenting the Policy to a Council Forum for consideration and, ultimately, to a Council Meeting for consent to advertise for public comment.”
If agreed by Council, it is proposed to advertise draft LPP 5.2 for public comment for a period of 42 days. This exceeds the minimum requirement of 21 days specified by DPS 2. It is proposed to advertise the LPP 5.2 in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of DPS 2:
1. Advertisement in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks;
2. Display on the City’s website; and
3. Letters to landowners and relevant stakeholders as determined by the Director Planning and Sustainability.
As discussed at the 12 July 2011 Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group Meeting, Administration will also hold an information session with landowners during the advertising period.
Comment
A draft Policy is needed to guide future development within the Town Centre as no detailed provisions currently exist to control development and built form outcomes in the Town Centre, other than the generic land use provisions that apply under District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
The draft Policy is consistent with the City’s Local Planning Policy Framework and is to be used by applicants, Administration and Council in the design, assessment and determination of future planning proposals within the Town Centre.
In the draft Policy there are five instances where provisions relating to residential density proposals, setback requirements, and land uses differ to those of Structure Plan No. 23: Wanneroo Town Centre. The differences are shown below.
|
Structure Plan No. 23 |
LPP 5.2 |
1 |
R-Codes |
|
1.1 |
The Western Sub-Precinct is identified as R40. |
The Policy identifies this area as ‘Residential R60 to RAC-4’. |
1.2 |
The Northern Sub-Precinct is identified as R80. |
The Policy identifies this area as ‘Residential R60 to RAC-4’. |
2 |
Setbacks |
|
2.1 |
The Western Sub-Precinct requires a minimum 6m primary street setback. |
The Policy identifies 2m primary street setbacks. |
2.2 |
The Northern Sub-Precinct requires a minimum 4m primary street setback. |
The Policy identifies 2m, 2.5m and 4m minimum primary street setbacks. |
3 |
Land Use |
|
3.1 |
The Structure Plan identifies a portion of land within the Northern Sub-Precinct as ‘Public Purpose’. |
The Policy includes this portion of land in the Northern Sub-Precinct mainly for residential development. |
Administration intends to review the existing Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan following adoption of the draft Policy to align with the provisions of LPP 5.2. The review will also ensure the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan is in line with the City’s Local Planning Policy 3.1: Structure Planning.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of DPS 2, Council may resolve to prepare and adopt a local planning policy to apply to any matter related to planning and development of the district. A draft policy must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve the quality of the built environment”
Policy Implications
The draft Policy will establish a clear and consistent planning framework for the assessment and determination of development and subdivision applications, where no such framework currently exists.
Financial Implications
The costs of advertising the draft policy are estimated to be $500, which can be met from the Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council pursuant to Clause 8.11.3.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 ADVERTISES draft Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre, as contained in Attachment 1, for public comment for a period of 42 days, by way of:
1. Advertisements in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks;
2. Display on the City’s website; and
3. Letters to landowners and relevant stakeholders as determined by the Director Planning and Sustainability.
Attachments:
1. |
DRAFT Local Planning Policy 5.2 Wanneroo Town Centre PDF |
11/85381 |
Minuted |
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
PS02-08/11 Drovers Place Precinct Structure Plan (Structure Plan 80) - Report on Submissions and Consideration for Final Approval
File Ref: 2957V02 – 11/87867
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Drovers Place Precinct Local Structure Plan No. 80 (LSP 80) to determine the modifications required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
Applicant |
Review undertaken by the City of Wanneroo |
Owner |
Various |
Location |
Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 100 & 12462 Drovers Place and Lots 810, 811, 1, 132, 10, 501, 2 & 406 Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
Site Area |
Approximately 36 Ha |
MRS Zoning |
Urban Deferred |
DPS 2 Zoning |
General Rural |
Background
The existing agreed Structure Plan No. 47 (SP 47) covers the subject land and was endorsed by Council on 26 April 2006 (Report PD11-04/06) and approved by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) in August 2007. A copy of SP 47 (current structure plan) is included as Attachment 1 and incorporates modifications determined by the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) in its Order dated 25 August 2010, relating to approval of Amendment No. 1 to SP 47 (SAT Matter No: DR 318 of 2009).
Council and the WAPC have required a review of SP 47 to consider those uses proposed in Amendments 1 to 3 and to consider appropriate environmental controls, infrastructure provision, traffic management and the ultimate role of the central precinct (in the context of the City’s Draft Centres Strategy), prior to finalising amendments to both the MRS and DPS 2. The status of the MRS and DPS 2 amendments are as follows.
MRS - Amendment 1155/57 - Proposed the transfer of land identified as ‘Rural Zone’ to the ‘Urban Zone’. Objections received during the public consultation period resulted in a hearing before a ‘hearings committee’ of the WAPC’s Metropolitan Region Planning Committee. The MRS amendment was subsequently modified to transfer the land to the ‘Urban Deferred’ Zone. Notice to this effect was published in the Government Gazette on 10 February 2009. The WAPC did not progress the ‘Urban’ zoning due to inadequacies in SP 47. The WAPC has foreshadowed that it will not lift the ‘Urban Deferment’ and transfer the land to the ‘Urban Zone’, until the City has reviewed SP 47 to address the following:
1. Access and drainage having regard to existing site constraints;
2. The interface between the structure plan and the adjacent Yellagonga Regional Park and Lake Joondalup;
3. Developer contribution arrangements; and
4. Ultimate development potential having regard for existing land uses.
Approval of the revised structure plan (SP 80) will enable the WAPC to consider initiating a new amendment to the land from ‘Urban Deferred’ to the ‘Urban’ Zone under the MRS.
DPS 2 - Amendment No 82 - Proposes to rezone the land from the ‘General Rural’ zone to the ‘Urban Development’ zone.
The City requested that this Amendment be processed simultaneously with MRS amendment 1155/57, however, under the provisions of Section 126(3) of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (the Act), the Amendment cannot be progressed until the WAPC is prepared to finalise the ‘Urban’ zoning under the MRS. Consequently, the zoning of the land will remain ‘General Rural’ in DPS 2 until the City has reviewed SP 47, thus enabling the WAPC to again consider amending the MRS.
Upon approval of the revised structure plan (SP 80), Council may request the WAPC to re-initiate Amendment 82 to transfer the land from ‘General Rural’ to ‘Urban Development’ zone under DPS 2.
The City has previously received three (3) applications to amend the current structure plan (SP 47) and recently received Amendment No. 4. Administration has considered the previous amendment proposals in the preparation of SP 80 and it is intended to consider proposed Amendment No. 4 as part of this report. The intent and history of Amendments 1 to 3 can be summarised as follows.
Amendment No.1 (Lots 810 and 811) to SP 47- To increase permissible uses to include showrooms, self-storage units, veterinary consulting rooms and veterinary hospital. Council refused Amendment No. 1 at its meeting of 18 November 2008 (Report PD06-11/08). The applicant appealed against Council's decision to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) and, as a result of mediation procedures, Council at its meeting of 10 March 2009 (Report PD05-03/09) reconsidered its refusal of Amendment No. 1 and resolved as follows:
“1. ADVISES the State Administrative Tribunal that, having reconsidered its resolution PD06-11/08 of 18 November 2008 relating to Amendment No. 1 to the Drovers Place Precinct Structure Plan No. 47, Council AGREES to set aside that decision and substitute it with SUPPORT for a modification to the structure plan that:
a) Adds the following text to the end of the structure plan clause 5.0 b) - "with the exception of the land uses permitted herein which, pursuant to clauses 9.8.3(b) and (f) of the Scheme, shall be applied as an intended variation to the Scheme and shall prevail over the land uses permitted for the land under the Scheme"; and
b) Adds the uses of "Showroom" and "Storage Unit" to the permitted uses for Lots 810 and 811 under clause 7.2.1 of the structure plan.
2. REQUIRES the Administration to review the Drovers Place Precinct Structure Plan No. 47 as a matter of priority, with a view to preparing a new structure plan for the whole of the area covered by the Urban Deferred zoning introduced by Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1155/57.”
The SAT noted the decision and a revised Amendment No. 1 (according with Council’s decision) was subsequently referred to the WAPC for determination. On 12 August 2009, the City received notification from the WAPC that it had resolved to refuse Amendment No. 1 for the following reasons (summarised):
· The City's draft Activity Centres Strategy does not identify the subject site as an ‘activity centre';
· The two additional uses proposed (Showrooms and Storage Units) have the potential to contribute towards the identification of the subject site as an activity centre, thereby adversely impacting on the activity centre hierarchy in the locality;
· State Planning Policy 4.2 'Metropolitan Centres Policy' recommends that bulky goods retailing should be located within Regional and District Centres, or within designated mixed business areas. The subject site is not designated as a Regional or District Centre or mixed business area;
· State Planning Policy 4.2 'Metropolitan Centres Policy', draft State Planning Policy 'Activity Centres for Perth and Peel', draft 'Directions 2031' and the Network City Strategy recommend that activity centres should have levels of activity, accessibility and diversity to attract people and sustain public transport and a range of other services and economic activities. In this regard, the subject site predominantly caters for car-based trade.
· The proposed inclusion of showrooms is considered to be inconsistent with draft State Planning Policy 'Activity Centres for Perth and Peel', which recommends that showrooms be located within designated activity centres or on the periphery of such centres.
The applicant again appealed to the SAT against the WAPC's decision on Amendment No. 1. After a lengthy mediation and hearing process, the SAT, on 25 August 2010, issued its order to approve a modified form of Amendment No. 1 (SAT Matter No: DR 318 of 2009) to allow a ‘restricted’ amount of showroom development within Lots 810 and 811 Wanneroo Road and allow storage units on Lot 811 only.
Amendment No. 2 – Proposes to replace the Special Residential zone over Lots 1 and 132 Wanneroo Road (directly adjoining Lots 810 and 811) with similar uses identified in Amendment No. 1 and to include the uses of Warehouses, Educational Establishments, Lunch Bar, Place of Worship, Hardware Store, Office, Video Hire, Veterinarian Consulting Rooms and Veterinarian Hospital. The applicant has since withdrawn this amendment pending the review of SP 47.
Amendment No. 3 – Proposes to increase permissible uses in the Tourism Precinct to include ‘Educational Establishment’ to facilitate the development of a Catholic high school. This amendment was held in abeyance, pending consideration of the review of SP 47 and an independent traffic audit commissioned by the City.
Progress of Amendments 1, 2 and 3 to SP 47 – Administration has incorporated the outcomes of SAT’s decision in regard to Amendment 1 and has given consideration to proposed Amendments 2 and 3 in the preparation of SP 80.
Administration presented draft SP 80 to the Council Forum held on 24 November 2009 and subsequently carried out public consultation under delegated authority, which concluded on 12 February 2010. Administration’s report on submissions was delayed to obtain independent assessment and advice on traffic movements, the nature and extent of land uses within the Business Precinct of the structure plan and the determination of Amendment No. 1 to SP 47 by the SAT.
SP 80 was listed on the 14 September 2010 Council Briefing meeting agenda, however, the report was subsequently withdrawn by Administration (at the request of a nearby commercial landowner) to provide an opportunity for that landowner to meet with Administration to discuss their submission before being reported to Council. Administration extended the same invitation to all landowners within the structure plan area and a series of landowner meetings were subsequently held.
A report on submissions was subsequently presented to Council on 8 February 2011 (Report PS03-02/11), where consideration was given to a range of new land uses proposed by the landowners, an independent traffic assessment (Version 2) prepared by GHD and commissioned by the City and submissions received from government agencies and members of the public.
The resolution of Council included significant variations to the recommended land uses within the Central Precinct, resulting in the deletion of several uses that Council considered to be inconsistent with the intent of the Central Precinct, which is to provide for ‘niche businesses’ that do not compromise the viability of nearby activity centres. As a result, the following land uses were subsequently deleted from SP 80:
Bank, Caretaker’s Dwelling, Child Care Centre, Consulting Room, Dry Cleaning Premises, Hairdresser, Hall, Laundry, Liquor Store, Medical Centre, Place of Assembly, Public Exhibition Facility, Recreation Centre, Take-Away Food Outlet, Video Hire, Mast or Antenna, Telecommunications Infrastructure;
Given the above, Council resolved that the modified draft SP 80 (refer Attachment 2) should be re-advertised for a period of 60 days. The modified SP 80 was re-advertised between 1 March 2011 and 10 May 2011. In May 2011, Administration became aware that the Main Roads WA (MRWA) - Traffic Modelling section had recently recalculated its traffic forecasts for 2021 and 2031, which could impact on the traffic report prepared by GHD (Version 2). Whilst GHD’s traffic report indicated that it was possible to achieve ‘reasonable’ operating conditions along Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive under the development scenario proposed by SP 80, Administration considered that the traffic report should be updated to reflect the revised MRWA forecasts, particularly given the updated forecasts included significant increases in traffic along Wanneroo Road and Joondalup Drive as per the following -
|
Joondalup Dr West of Wanneroo Road.
|
Wanneroo Road South of Joondalup Drive
|
Previous MRWA forecast |
2021: 36,500-45,000vpd 2031: 40,000-49,000vpd
|
2021: 23,000-28,000vpd 2031: 26,000- 32,000vpd
|
Revised MRWA Forecast |
2021: 56,200vpd 2031: 57,400vpd
|
2021: 45,300vpd 2031: 47,800vpd
|
The revised MRWA forecasts reveal that, as a result of natural increases in regional traffic, by 2021 Joondalup Drive west of Wanneroo Road will be carrying more than 56,000 vehicles per day (vpd) (10,000 – 20,000 more than previously forecast); and that by 2021 Wanneroo Road south of Joondalup Drive will be carrying more than 45,000 vpd (almost double the volume previously predicted). The need for MRWA to revise its traffic forecasts (upwards) for these sections of Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road, is justified by the fact that both sections of road adjacent to SP 80 are already carrying the approximate traffic volumes previously forecast by MRWA to be achieved by 2021.
In July 2011, the revised traffic assessment report (version 3) was received by the City. The report identifies a number of issues associated with traffic movements through the proposed intersections. The implications and recommendations of the revised traffic report have been included in the ‘Detail’ section of this report.
Detail
The advertised version of SP 80 proposed three precincts within the structure plan area, which reflect existing uses and objectives for each location. Key elements of the advertised version of SP 80 are outlined below:
The Western Precinct retains and recognises the existing aged person’s development and proposes a combination of discretionary uses associated with community, tourism, cultural, and educational activities. The specific uses proposed include residential (Lot 5 only – ‘Aged care’), educational establishment, (Lots 6, 7 and 8), Public Use (FESA) and the following uses for Lot 4 - holiday village/resort, mast/antenna, private recreation, public exhibition facility, reception centre and restaurant.
The Central Precinct is depicted as a ‘special use’ zone to incorporate niche business in the structure plan area. SP 80 promotes niche business uses that already exist on Lots 819 and 810 or where considered acceptable by Council. SP 80 also promotes the expansion of the Central Precinct to include the undeveloped land on Lots 1 and 132, as depicted in the structure plan map.
The range of land uses proposed in the Central Precinct recognises the car-based accessibility of the site, the high exposure of the site to passing trade and the suitability of the location for ‘niche businesses’.
The Southern Precinct proposes a ‘special residential’ area, providing for single dwellings in a natural landscape setting. Development provisions are proposed to manage impacts of development on Yellagonga Regional Park and to minimise the impact of midge nuisance on future residents.
Detailed Area Plans will provide for a higher level of detail associated with the proposed land uses and built form to assist in achieving the required development and land use outcomes for each precinct. SP 80 requires a Detailed Area Plan (DAP) to be submitted and approved by the City, prior to the City supporting any subdivision or approving any development in the area. The required DAP must relate to the entire precinct and may itself be subject to public advertising, prior to determination by the City. Each DAP will need to address and illustrate a range of detailed design and development standards, such as setbacks, building heights, active frontages, access locations, development interface with adjacent precincts and the like.
Table E – Planning Framework provides for the next level of investigation into the development of individual landholdings and prescribes the required information to be submitted at the appropriate stage of subdivision or development. Table E requires the following matters to be addressed at the relevant stage:
· Additional traffic assessment;
· Wetland rehabilitation;
· Soil contamination investigation;
· Acid sulphate soil investigation;
· Urban water management plans;
· Dieback management plans;
· Midge management plans;
· Landscaping plans; and
· Archeological and heritage investigations.
Table F – Infrastructure Provision recognises that there is a nexus between the types of land uses being proposed by the landowners and the need to provide additional traffic controls for SP 80. Parts 5.1 and 5.2 obligate the owners of Lots 1 and 132 Wanneroo Road to design and construct the new traffic signals at the intersection of Wanneroo Road and Clarkson Avenue and the owners of Lots 6, 7 and 8 Drovers Place to design and construct new traffic signals on Joondalup Drive.
Consultation
The draft LSP was advertised for public comment for a period of 60 days by means of two (2) on-site signs, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper, display on the City’s website and written notification to all affected landowners and members of the public that had previously made a submission on the proposal. The submission period closed on 10 May 2011, with 27 submissions being received (including 1 petition from the residents of the aged care facility). A summary of submissions received and Administration responses are provided in Attachment 3.
The main issues raised during the advertising period and following detailed assessment by Administration relate to:
· The impact of traffic;
· The impact on Amenity;
· Requesting additional uses within the Central Precinct;
· Requesting additional uses within Lot 4 Drovers Place (Western Precinct);
· Government agency comments; and
· Requesting Council to initiate Amendment No. 4 to the existing SP 47 (also received as a separate application)
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of LSP 80 is provided in the ‘Comment’ section below.
Comment
Administration has reviewed SP 47 and prepared SP 80 to address the issues raised by the WAPC and Council as part of Amendments 1 to 3 to SP 47 and proposed amendments to the MRS and DPS 2. The City has extensively consulted with landowners within the structure plan area to ascertain their views and intentions for development of their respective holdings. In addition to the responses and recommendations provided in the summary of submissions (Attachment 3), the following provides an overview of the more significant issues relating to SP 80.
Traffic Assessment - As a result of the revised MRWA traffic forecasts for Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road, the City requested GHD to revise the Drovers Place Traffic Study (Version 2). The revised traffic assessment (Version 3) included analysis of the proposed intersections at Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road. A copy of the Conclusions and Recommendations of the revised traffic assessment report is included in Attachment 4.
Joondalup Drive Traffic Signals
Some key conclusions and recommendations from the revised traffic assessment, relating to Joondalup Drive are summarised below:
Conclusions and Recommendations:
· Joondalup Drive west of Wanneroo Road is already operating above capacity, while Wanneroo Road south of Joondalup Drive can accommodate approximately a 36% increase in traffic volumes before reaching capacity;
· The introduction of a 1500 student high school represents a high traffic generating land use that will have implications on traffic movements along Joondalup Drive, particularly during peak periods, which will compound access and congestion issues;
· Joondalup Drive is already quite congested and a significant upgrade is required to avoid queuing back to Burns Beach Road. Additional turning lanes would be required at the intersection to enable turning vehicles to queue;
· Appropriate intersection configuration and significant upgrade of Joondalup Drive to three lanes will be required by 2031;
· A good road connection between Drovers Place and the proposed Clarkson Avenue/Wanneroo Road intersection is required. Further modelling should be considered to determine the intersections proposed as a linked network; and
· Dedicated FESA access required, including the consideration of transponder/transmitters for the traffic signals.
GHD has also provided the following supplementary advice since preparing its revised traffic assessment (Version 3):
· If the intersection with Joondalup Drive is signalised and relocated westward, closer to Burns Beach Road (as required by Main Roads WA), but Joondalup Drive remains in its current form (two lanes in each direction) then it will not be capable of supporting the Educational Establishment proposed for the Western Precinct.
· If the above intersection with Joondalup Drive also incorporates additional queuing lanes on the approach to the intersection both east and west (to prevent stopped vehicle queues from interfering with the Wanneroo Road intersection and Burns Beach Road roundabout) then the intersection will function suitably under the full development scenario proposed for the Western Precinct based on 2010 traffic figures. Under this scenario (and assuming no further natural growth in regional traffic) traffic should clear the intersection in a single cycle.
· By 2021 and 2031, three full length lanes will be required in each direction along Joondalup Drive, from Wanneroo Road to Burns Beach Road. Without this occurring vehicle queues could extend back to the Burns Beach Road roundabout.
· If the size of the school is halved (to 750 students), or replaced with residential development of 100 or 200 dwellings, the traffic conditions would not be severe and the maximum queue length would not interfere with Burns Beach Road or Wanneroo Road. Traffic would be expected to clear in a single cycle, however, the signalised intersection would still require additional queuing (turning) lanes along Joondalup Drive.
Considering the results of the revised traffic assessment, the following options are available to Council in terms of dealing with the Educational Establishment proposed for the Western Precinct:
Option 1 - Council can delete the Educational Establishment proposed for Lots 6, 7 and 8 and replace it with a lesser traffic-generating land use(s).
Option 2 - Council can retain the Educational Establishment proposed for the Western Precinct but limit its size to a maximum of 750 students, while highlighting that no further increases to the school will be permitted until or unless Joondalup Drive has been upgraded to three lanes in each direction, providing also that any future increase in the school beyond that size is supported by a revised traffic assessment undertaken at that time.
Option 3 - Council can retain the Educational Establishment in the Western Precinct at the size already proposed by the landowner (1500 students), subject to new provisions being included in the structure plan limiting the initial size and possible staged growth of the school as described in Option 2 above (i.e. not more than 750 students unless Joondalup Drive is widened and providing any expansion is justified by a revised traffic assessment).
Option 4 - Council can retain the Educational Establishment as a use capable of being approved on Lots 6, 7 and 8, while also reintroducing those uses already permitted under SP 47 on that land, which relate to low scale tourism such as tearooms, local arts and craft, art galleries and restaurant/cafes. Under this option, new provisions should be included in SP 80 to make Educational Establishment a ‘D’ (discretionary) use on Lots 6, 7 and 8 only and to require any development application for a school on that land (regardless of student numbers) to be supported by a traffic impact assessment prepared to MRWA’s satisfaction, with any such application also being mandatorily referred to MRWA for its comment.
On balance, Administration considers that Option 4 above represents the most reasonable and pragmatic response to the traffic issues discussed earlier, as it preserves the opportunity for the owner of Lots 6, 7 and 8 to seek approval for development of a school on that land, subject to it being justified by a traffic impact assessment. In the event such application is submitted, the City will have the discretion to either approve or refuse the development, following a detailed assessment of the proposal, receipt of comments from MRWA and consideration of the traffic situation existing at that time. Further, reintroducing the tourism-related uses already permitted in the Western Precinct under SP 47 would ensure that Lots 6, 7 and 8 are capable of being developed for purposes other than an Educational Establishment (if that use does not proceed). Without introducing these extra uses Lots 6, 7 and 8 could be rendered undevelopable, given that draft SP 80 proposes to prohibit all other uses (other than Educational Establishment) from occurring on those lots. Importantly, by only reintroducing those uses that are already permitted under SP 47, it will not be necessary to readvertise the structure plan, as it would then merely constitute a continuation of existing use permissibility under SP 47.
Wanneroo Road Traffic Signals - it is apparent that the structure plan needs to minimise the impact of traffic generated by the Drovers Place land uses on the abutting regional roads, whilst providing a reasonable level of service for existing uses within the Central Precinct. The expansion of the Central Precinct provides the opportunity to install traffic signals (including a double right turn lane out of that precinct) along Wanneroo Road, which will assist in the movement of traffic into and out of the Central Precinct. The revised traffic assessment indicates that an acceptable level of service can be achieved using 2010 traffic volumes, however, it is noted that by 2021 Wanneroo Road will require an additional lane in each direction to achieve a reasonable level of service and by 2031 the level of service will again be unacceptable.
Administration supports the proposed traffic signals at the intersection with Clarkson Avenue on the basis that the level of service is currently acceptable and because it will provide improved traffic circulation for existing uses within the Central Precinct. It will also provide a controlled intersection for Clarkson Avenue, which will benefit the residents of Tapping and improve traffic movements from the eastern side of Wanneroo Road, including traffic associated with St Stephens School, Tapping Primary School and the future local centre located on the corner of Wanneroo Road and Clarkson Avenue.
Central Precinct Land Uses - Modifications to the Central Precinct land uses have again been requested by landowners in that precinct, to further intensify the permitted business/commercial uses.
While Administration previously (in its report to Council on 8 February 2011, Item PS03-02/11) supported some of the additional uses now being requested by landowners, Council was concerned that some of those uses, if allowed in the Central Precinct in combination with other permissible uses, could constitute a de facto shopping centre and directly conflict and compete with existing or proposed activity centres in the locality. Council at that meeting consequently resolved to delete the following uses from the Central Precinct:
· Bank
· Caretaker’s Dwelling
· Child Care Centre
· Consulting Room
· Dry Cleaning Premises
· Hairdresser
· Hall
· Laundry
· Liquor Store
· Medical Centre
· Place of Assembly
· Public Exhibition Facility
· Recreation Centre
· Take-Away Food Outlet
· Video Hire
· Mast or Antenna
· Telecommunications Infrastructure
Separate submissions by the owners of land within the Central Precinct have requested that Council reconsider the above uses together with the following additional uses:
· Car Wash
· Club (non-residential)
· Convenience Store
· Pharmacy
· Service Station
· Tavern
· Vehicle Sales Premises.
These uses were previously excluded by Administration as they were considered to be in conflict with the intent of the Central Precinct. Administration still maintains its past position on these uses.
While it is open to Council to reconsider its previous decision on Central Precinct land uses and introduce additional permitted uses, doing so will likely require readvertising of SP 80, will require further revision of the structure plan document and will inevitably delay the finalisation of the structure plan, but without producing any better planning outcome than what is already proposed under SP 80. In Administration’s opinion, landowners have been given abundant opportunities to present their case for additional land uses in the Central Precinct, they have taken those opportunities and have been more successful than not in securing Council’s past support for a generous range of land uses within what is essentially intended to be a precinct catering for niche business activities. At this late stage in the planning process, Administration is not prepared to entertain any further additions to the land uses proposed for the Central Precinct than what was advertised under SP 80.
If landowners still seek to introduce additional land uses then they should do so by submitting an amendment to SP 80 once it is adopted. Any such amendment will then be considered on its individual merits and will (in accordance with DPS 2) either be deemed unsatisfactory and rejected or advertised for public comment.
Proposed Amendment No. 4 to Structure Plan 47 – In addition to a submission received on behalf of the landowner of Lots 810 and 811 Drovers Place, the City has received a formal application to amend the current SP 47 to include the following uses:
· Car Wash
· Hairdresser
· Liquor Store
· Recreation Centre
· Dry Cleaning Premises
· Laundromat
· Veterinary Consulting Rooms
· Veterinary Hospital
Similar uses have been proposed for Lots 810 and 811 under that landowner’s submission on SP 80 (submission 22) and therefore, it is intended make a decision regarding Amendment No. 4 as part of this report.
With regard to the additional uses listed above, it is worth noting that Council previously (in its last decision on SP 80) supported Veterinary Consulting Rooms and Veterinary Hospital on Lots 810 and 811. As such, Administration would be prepared to support those uses being permitted on Lots 810 and 811 under SP 47, if draft SP 80 did not exist or had not progressed to its current point. However, the fact is that draft SP 80 does indeed exist and is now before Council for consideration of final adoption, for the express purpose of superseding SP 47. SP 80 represents a seriously entertained proposal that must be afforded serious consideration in making any decision on SP 47. It is unreasonable and unacceptable to entertain any amendments to SP 47 given the status of SP 80, as doing so would likely further delay finalisation of SP 80 for the possible benefit of one landowner at the expense of all others in the structure plan area. Therefore, Administration will recommend that Council refuses Amendment No. 4 to SP 47.
Options available to Council – In accordance with Part 9.6 of DPS 2, Council is required to consider the submissions received and either:
a) Refuse to adopt the structure plan; or
b) Resolve that the structure plan is satisfactory with or without modifications.
In this instance, Council is advised that the following represent possible options in relation to progressing SP 80:
· Approve SP 80 in its current format (as advertised) and forward it to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for final approval;
· Modify SP 80 in accordance with Administration’s recommendation and forward it to the WAPC for final approval;
· Resolve to make additional modifications to SP 80 to those recommended by Administration and forward the modified SP 80 to the WAPC for final approval; and
· Not proceed with the review of the structure plan and consider any development or subdivision within the context of SP 47.
Conclusion
In light of the preceding discussion, it is apparent that both Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road are already operating at and near capacity (respectively) and that natural increases in regional traffic volumes will require the widening of both those roads by 2021, regardless of development proposed within Drovers Place under SP 80. Although that development will place additional traffic load onto Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road, the impact of that additional traffic can be managed with intersection upgrades together with full-length road widening and (in the case of the Educational Establishment proposed for Lots 6, 7 and 8) further traffic impact assessment and reduction or restriction of the proposed school size. SP 80 provides both the catalyst and opportunity for these intersections to be created and constructed to the required signalised standard by landowners within the Western and Central Precincts of the structure plan area.
In terms of land uses, Administration is not recommending any modifications to the uses already prescribed for the various precincts under the most recently advertised version of SP 80, with the exception of re-introducing the low impact tourism-related uses already permitted under SP 47 on Lots 6, 7 and 8.
Draft SP 80 has been voluntarily prepared by the City for the benefit of all landowners in Drovers Place, in order to deliver a more contemporary, flexible and generous planning regime for that area than what currently exists under SP 47. Preparation of the plan has been costly, time-consuming and resource-intensive for the City and Administration is therefore seeking to bring the plan to a conclusion without further delay.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following advertisement of a Structure Plan, Council may refuse to adopt the Structure Plan or resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without modifications. It is recommended that the Local Structure Plan be approved with modifications.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise impact of development on the environment”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The City has expended in the order of $40,000 on consultant’s fees in relation to traffic and retail assessments for Draft SP 80, together with countless staff hours and City resources.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the submissions received in response to Draft Structure Plan No. 80 (included as Attachment 3) and ENDORSES Administration’s responses to those submissions;
2. PURSUANT to Clause 9.6.1 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that Draft Structure Plan No. 80 included as Attachment 2 is SATISFACTORY, subject to the following modifications being made to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability:
a) MODIFY Table B – Planning Requirements for the Western Precinct by listing the following discretionary (‘D’) uses as the only uses permitted on Lots 6, 7 and 8:
· Educational Establishment
· Low scale tourism-related uses, as determined by Council, including tearooms, local arts and craft, art galleries and restaurant/cafes
b) MODIFY Table B – Planning Requirements for the Western Precinct to include a provision(s) requiring a traffic impact assessment to accompany and justify any development application for an Educational Establishment on Lots 6, 7 and 8, prepared to Main Roads Western Australia’s satisfaction, and requiring any such application to be advertised for public comment and referred to Main Roads Western Australia for its comment prior to the City making its determination on that proposal;
c) AMEND Plan 1 of Draft Structure Plan No. 80 to reflect the recommendations of the traffic report to re-locate the signalised intersection along Joondalup Drive to the western boundary of draft Structure Plan No. 80;
3. PURSUANT to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the modified Structure Plan No. 80, AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL the structure plan and schedule of submissions provided in Attachment 3 and FORWARDS Structure Plan No. 80 to the Western Australia Planning Commission;
4. REQUESTS the Western Australian Planning Commission to:
a) Lift the ‘Urban Deferred’ status of the land covered by Structure Plan No. 80 and convert the land to the ‘Urban’ zone under the Metropolitan Region Scheme; and
b) Simultaneously amend District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone the land covered by Structure Plan No. 80 from ‘General Rural’ to ‘Urban Development’, pursuant to section 126(3) of the Planning and Development Act 2005, as previously proposed by Amendment 1155/57 to the Metropolitan Region Scheme and Amendment No. 82 to District Planning Scheme No. 2;
5. SUBJECT to the final adoption of Structure Plan No. 80, REVOKES Structure Plan No. 47, in accordance with Part 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No. 2; and
6. PURSUANT to subclauses 9.4.1(c) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that proposed Amendment No. 4 to Local Structure Plan No. 47, NOT BE AGREED TO, for the following reason:
· It is unreasonable and inappropriate to entertain any amendments to Structure Plan No. 47 given that it is subject to review through draft Structure Plan No. 80.
Attachments:
1. |
Agreed Structure Plan 47 |
11/89062 |
|
2. |
Advertised Version SP80 |
11/89063 |
Minuted |
3. |
Summary of Submissions |
11/90226 |
Minuted |
4. |
Traffic Report - Conclusions and Recommendations |
11/92016 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 98
File Ref: 3377-18 – 11/82562
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the advertising for public comment of proposed Amendment No. 18 to East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 (ASP 3) lodged by Planning Solutions on behalf of Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd.
Applicant |
Planning Solutions |
Owner |
Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd |
Location |
Lot 9604 Pinjar Road and Portion of Lot 501 Conti Road, Ashby |
Site Area |
Approximately 6.5 hectares (ha) |
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
ASP 3 Zoning |
Residential R20 and R40 |
Background
On 5 May 2011, the City received a request from Planning Solutions on behalf of Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd to amend ASP 3 by recoding a portion of Lot 9604 Pinjar Road, Ashby and a portion of Lot 501 Conti Road, Ashby. The subject site is bounded by Conti Road to the north, Pinjar Road to the east, the proposed Ashby Neighbourhood Centre to the south and Fomiatti Street to the west. Attachment 1 contains the location plan depicting the subject lots and Fomiatti Street. It is noted that Fomiatti Street was recently constructed as per the Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) subdivision approval 141586 dated 25 May 2010.
Attachment 2 contains ASP 3 structure plan depicting the site. Lot 9604 is entirely coded R20 while Lot 501 is partially coded R20 and partially R40. The R40 area is located at the southern end of the lot adjoining the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre site. The south-western corner of Lot 501 is proposed as Public Open Space, and is outside the amendment area.
On 21 June 2011, the Director Planning and Sustainability sent a memorandum to the Elected Members advising of Administration’s intention to advertise the proposed amendment under delegated authority and providing the opportunity for Elected Members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. A request was received that the proposal be presented to Council for consideration prior to advertising.
Detail
Amendment 18 proposes to amend ASP 3 by recoding:
· Lot 9604 Pinjar Road, Ashby from Residential R20 to Residential R30, R40 and R60 excepting for the future R20 lots abutting Conti Road; and
· A portion of Lot 501 Conti Road, Ashby to the east of Fomiatti Street from Residential R40 to Residential R60 and from Residential R20 to Residential R30, R40 and 60 excepting for the future R20 lots abutting Conti Road.
Attachment 3 contains the plan depicting the proposed density codings.
Amendment 18 will facilitate the creation of approximately 165 dwellings on the subject site, with approximately:
· 13 lots being provided in the area proposed to be coded R30;
· 82 lots being provided in the area proposed to be coded R40;
· 33 lots being provided in the area proposed to be coded R60;
· one R40 grouped dwelling site (to create nine dwellings); and
· five R60 grouped dwelling sites (to create a total of 28 dwellings).
The R60 lots are located adjacent to the proposed Ashby Neighbourhood Centre. It is noted that under the current coding, the amendment area is likely to create 80, R20 lots and one R40 grouped dwelling site.
The Ashby Neighbourhood Centre site is zoned ‘Centre’ in ASP 3 and is located south of the site subject to Amendment 18 and at the immediate north-western corner of Hollosy Way and Pinjar Road. The location of the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre in relation to the site subject to Amendment 18 is included as Attachment 1.
Council at its meeting of 3 May 2011 adopted the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre Local Structure Plan No. 77 (ASP 77) (Refer Item PS03-05/11). On 30 May 2011, the WAPC adopted ASP 77 subject to minor modifications. The City and the WAPC have since certified the ASP 77 document.
A traffic report was submitted with the proposed Amendment and this report indicated that the estimated volume of traffic on Fomiatti Street, including that generated by the amendment, would not exceed more than 1000 vehicles per day. This is consistent with the requirements of the WAPC’s Liveable Neighbourhoods policy for a road of this classification (‘Access Street D’).
Consultation
Should Council determine the proposed ASP Amendment is satisfactory for the purposes of advertising for public comment, advertising would be carried out in accordance with Clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). This would include an advertising period of 42 days as per the provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2) by placing an advertisement in a newspaper circulating in the district; including a notice on the City’s website; displaying an on-site sign giving notice of the proposal; and writing to the affected landowners adjoining the Amendment area.
Comment
Proposed Amendment No. 18 to ASP 3 includes all of the information required by the City’s LPP 4.2 and as a result, Administration considers the proposal to be acceptable for the purposes of advertising. In accordance with the intent of the City’s LPP 4.2, Administration’s full assessment of the proposal will occur during the advertising period. It is recommended that pursuant to Clause 9.5 of the City’s DPS 2, the proposal be advertised inviting public comments.
Statutory Compliance
Part 9 of DPS 2 requires that Council determine whether the proposed ASP Amendment is satisfactory for the purposes of advertising for public comment. The four options available to Council are to determine that:
· The proposal is satisfactory for advertising for public comment;
· The proposal is satisfactory and waives public notification if it considers that adequate public notification of the proposal has already been undertaken;
· The proposal is satisfactory for advertising for public comment subject to specified modifications being made or specified matters being attended to; or
· The proposal should not be agreed to.
The proposed Amendment has been sufficiently prepared and supported with an adequate level of detail to meet all the requirements of DPS 2 to proceed to advertising for public comment.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
Policy Implications
The proposal is assessed under the provisions of the City’s LPP 4.2.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.7 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 DETERMINES that the proposed Amendment No. 18 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 to:
a) Recode Lot 9604 Pinjar Road, Ashby from Residential R20 to Residential R30, R40 and R60 excepting for the future R20 lots abutting Conti Road; and
b) Recode a portion of Lot 501 Conti Road, Ashby to the east of Fomiatti Street from Residential R40 to Residential R60 and from Residential R20 to Residential R30, R40 and 60 excepting for the future R20 lots abutting Conti Road;
submitted by Planning Solutions Town Planners on behalf of Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd and included in Attachment 3 to this report is satisfactory for the purpose of advertising; and
2. Pursuant to Clause 9.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning ADVERTISES proposed Amendment No. 18 to the East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed Structure Plan No. 3 submitted by Planning Solutions Town Planners on behalf of Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd and included as Attachment 3, for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
1. |
Amendment 18 in relation to Ashby Neighbourhood Centre Location Plan |
11/90767 |
|
2. |
Amendment No. 18 to East Wanneroo Cell 1 Agreed STructure Plan No. 3 |
11/84402 |
|
3. |
AMENDMENT 18 TO EAST WANNEROO CELL 1 AGREED STRUCTURE PLAN No. 3 MAP |
11/88830 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 105
File Ref: 3730 – 11/83790
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 8
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83 (LSP 83) at the close of advertising, to determine the modifications required and its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
Applicant |
Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planning & Urban Design |
Owner |
Atlantis Cove Pty Ltd |
Location |
Lot 204 (342), Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks |
Site Area |
Approximately 545 hectares |
MRS Zoning |
Urban, Urban Deferred, Other Regional Roads Reserve and Railways Reserve |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development, Other Regional Roads Reserve and Railways Reserve |
Background
Draft LSP 83 was lodged with the City by Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planning and Urban Design, on behalf of Atlantis Cove Pty Ltd, on 24 January 2011. The proposal was subject to considerable review prior to lodgement and subsequent advertising for public comment.
Draft LSP 83 covers an area of approximately 545 hectares within Lot 204 (342), Breakwater Drive, Two Rocks and is bound by Breakwater Drive to the south, the Shire of Gingin to the north, a Regional Open Space Reserve to the east and undeveloped ‘Urban Development’ zoned land to the west (refer Attachment 1).
Draft LSP 83 area also falls within the Agreed Yanchep-Two Rocks District Structure Plan No. 43 (DSP 43) area. DSP 43 identifies a portion of the Two Rocks Secondary Centre (formally Two Rocks Regional Centre) and a number of neighbourhood centres within the LSP 83 area. The Two Rocks Secondary Centre is also identified in a number of strategic planning documents released by the WAPC, including ‘Directions 2031 and Beyond’ and ‘State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres for Perth and Peel’ (SPP 4.2).
The Acting Director Planning and Sustainability presented draft LSP 83 to the Council Forum held on 22 February 2011. On 25 February 2011, the Acting Director Planning and Sustainability forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests were received and advertising of LSP 83 subsequently commenced in accordance with Clause 9.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) on 29 March 2011 for a period of 42 days, closing on 10 May 2011.
A superlot subdivision, dividing Lot 204 into four smaller lots was lodged with the WAPC on 12 October 2010 and was referred to Administration for comment.
Administration considered that the superlot subdivision met the requirements of Clause 9.11 of DPS 2 and the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2) as it was for superlot purposes and would not prejudice future development outcomes. The WAPC issued approval for the subdivision application on 18 March 2011.
Detail
The draft LSP has been prepared in order to facilitate development of the Lot 204 area in accordance with DSP 43, and to satisfy the requirements of the ‘Urban Development’ zone under DPS 2.
The key elements of the proposed structure plan are:
· A predominately residential development at a range of densities delivering approximately 7,500 dwellings with an anticipated resident population of around 17,000 – 18,000;
· A portion of the Two Rocks Secondary Centre, as identified in the District Structure Plan, located adjacent to a proposed secondary transit station (light rail/bus);
· Four primary school sites, three of which are co-located with active public open space and are 3ha in size; and one which is a 4ha stand alone site;
· Two neighbourhood activity centres, provided in accordance with DSP 43 and located adjacent to primacy school sites to create a community hub;
· Two local centres located to maximise access within the LSP 83 area to convenience retail;
· The provision of 50ha of strategic public open space (POS), including 14.7ha of conservation open space, providing usable passive and active open space as well as retaining key landforms and significant vegetation; and
· The provision of social, pedestrian and cycle links through the LSP area linking coastal areas, Bush Forever sites and the activity centres.
Attachment 2 contains the advertised version of the Part 1 Statutory Section of the draft LSP 83, including the draft Structure Plan Map.
Consultation
The draft LSP was advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days by means of on-site signage; an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper and on the City’s website; and letters to nearby landowners. The submission period opened on 29 March 2011 and closed on 10 May 2011, with a total of 11 submissions received. Two submissions were received after the closing date, being those from the Department of Planning and the Department of Environment and Conservation. A list of all submitters is included as Attachment 3 with a summary of all submissions received, together with Administration’s response to each included as Attachment 4.
In accordance with the City’s LPP 4.2, Administration also conducted its assessment of draft LSP 83 during the advertising period and this assessment and Administrations recommended modifications to draft LSP 83 are included as Attachment 5 and specific comments relating to the Local Water Management Strategy (LWMS) are included in Attachment 6.
The main issues raised through Administration’s assessment and in the submissions received relate to:
· Renaming of the Local Structure Plan;
· Local Water Management Strategy (LWMS);
· Provision of Conservation Public Open Space;
· Co-location of Primary Schools and Public Open Space;
· Allocation of Bore Water for Public Open Space Irrigation; and
· Two Rocks Secondary Centre.
A more detailed discussion of the abovementioned issues is provided in the comment section of this report.
Comment
Renaming of the Local Structure Plan
Draft LSP 83 was lodged with the City under the name ‘Lot 204 Breakwater Drive’. Considering a superlot subdivision approval for Lot 204 has now been issued and that further subdivision will likely occur in this area, it is considered inappropriate to name LSP 83 after the lot or lots that currently apply to this area when this will change over time. It is therefore recommended that LSP 83 be renamed from ‘Lot 204 Breakwater Drive’ to ‘East Two Rocks’ Local Structure Plan No. 83.
Local Water Management Strategy
The draft LSP 83 incorporates a LWMS as part of the technical appendices that support the Structure Plan. The LWMS provides technical guidance for the management of water resources and stormwater for the proposed development. During advertising, both Administration and Department of Water (DoW) identified modifications required to the LWMS. The changes and modifications required to the LWMS by Administration and DoW are listed in Attachment 6.
Provision of Conservation Public Open Space
Part 2 of draft LSP 83 states “The LSP does not include any of the significant natural assets identified in Cl 2.8 of the City’s Public Open Space Local Planning Policy 4.3 (LPP4.3), and as such does not contain any open space defined as conservation for the purpose of the City’s policy”. Clause 2.8 of LPP 4.3 includes provision for a minimum of three percent (3%) of the gross sub-divisible area to be provided as POS for the purposes of conservation and passive recreation where the following significant natural assets exist:
1. Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities;
2. Declared Rare and Priority Flora Species;
3. Specially Protected and Priority Fauna Species;
4. Matters of National Environmental Significance (as per the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999);
5. Wetlands;
6. Karstic features e.g. caves and pinnacles;
7. Vegetation complexes protected below 30% of their original extent (as detailed in the City’s Local Biodiversity Strategy);
8. Coastal Vegetation; and
9. Significant Trees (as defined by the City’s Tree Preservation Policy).
Lot 204 Breakwater Drive contains six of the above natural assets (priority ecological communities, specially protected fauna, matters of National Environmental Significance, a vegetation complex with below 30% protection, coastal vegetation and significant trees). It is therefore recommended that LSP 83 be modified to include three percent (3%) of the gross sub-divisible area as POS for the purposes of conservation and passive recreation. Attachment 7 includes an amended Structure Plan Map, which incorporates this recommended modification.
Co-Location of Primary Schools and Public Open Space
Draft LSP 83 proposes four primary schools within the LSP area, with three of these co-locating with POS. Of the three co-located sites, two of the schools, in the north-eastern and south-western parts of the LSP 83 area, were co-located with a 2ha POS area (POS F & H respectively, refer Attachment 2) with the primary school in the south-east being co-located with a 2.5ha POS area (POS G, refer Attachment 2). Whilst DSP 43 proposes regional open space to the immediate south of the LSP 83 area it is considered necessary to provide two senior size ovals for the estimated population of 17,000 – 18,000 that will result from the development of the LSP 83 area.
Following a review of the POS areas, it is considered that the size of the co-located sites are too small to cater for two senior size ovals. The creation of two senior sized ovals can, however, be achieved by increasing the size of POS G from 2.5ha to 3.5ha and incorporating an area of 2.5ha for active POS within POS E. This modification has been reflected within the amended structure plan map (refer Attachment 7).
Allocation of Bore Water for Public Open Space Irrigation
During the advertising period, submissions were received that raised concern on the availability of water for irrigation of the active POS. The concerns raised were based on the low levels of water available in the Yanchep-Two Rocks area, with only 144,000kL available in the February 2011 aquifer allocation and the LWMS stating that 245,000kL per year is required for the irrigation of POS in the LSP 83 area. The June 2011 aquifer allocation report identified an increased amount of water available in the Yanchep-Two Rocks area, with 319,660kL available. The available allocation for any Groundwater Area is calculated through the allocation limit (of 10,868,800kL) minus the total allocated, committed and requested groundwater (of 10,549,140kL). This figure can change at any time based on many factors such as the return of licensed allocations, expired licences, recouping of unused allocations and changes in sustainable allocation limits. An application to the Department of Water (DoW) has already been made by the proponent requesting an allocation of 247,500kL/yr and is currently being assessed. Based on the revised availability of adequate aquifer allocation to meet the irrigation requirements of the POS proposed for the LSP 83 area, Administration considers that the concerns raised in relation to the availability of water for irrigation of the active POS have now been addressed.
Two Rocks Secondary Centre
Based on the size, scale and significance of the Two Rocks Secondary Centre in relation to the development of the Two Rocks locality, it is recommended that a single centre structure plan be required to holistically plan for the development of this Activity Centre in order to address issues such as transport, employment and design matters. Currently the Activity Centre is split across various landholdings, including Lot 204, which could potentially lead to ad hoc development of the Activity Centre and the transport network that passes through it. It is therefore recommended that Council require the preparation of a single centre structure plan for the Two Rocks Secondary Centre, covering the entire area highlighted in Attachment 8, as a prerequisite to Council’s support for subdivision or Council’s consideration of any application for development within that area.
The preparation of a single centre structure plan will allow a number of transportation and employment issues, raised in relation to draft LSP 83, to be addressed through a holistic approach to the planning of the Two Rocks Secondary Centre.
Conclusion
Draft LSP 83 has been the subject of extensive consultation between the applicants, Administration and other relevant public authorities and landowners. The revised draft LSP 83 is considered to be satisfactory, subject to the recommended modifications included in Attachments 4, 5 and 6. Attachment 7 contains a modified version of the Part 1 Statutory Section of draft LSP 83 showing tracked changes in accordance with Administration’s recommended modifications.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following advertisement of a Structure Plan, Council may refuse to adopt the Structure Plan or resolve that the Structure Plan is satisfactory with or without modifications. It is recommended that draft LSP be approved subject to the recommended modifications included in Attachment 4, Attachment 5 and Attachment 6 of this report.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise impact of development on the environment”
Policy Implications
The proposal has been processed in accordance with the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2 – Structure Planning.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, RESOLVES that the draft Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83 December 2010 submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett, on behalf of Atlantis Cove Pty Ltd, is satisfactory subject to the Recommended Modifications contained within Attachments 4, 5 and 6 being made to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability;
2. REFERS the Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for approval in accordance with Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, once modified in accordance with 1. above;
3. NOTES the summary of submissions received in respect of draft Local Structure Plan No. 3, included as Attachment 5, ENDORSES Administration’s response to those submissions and FORWARDS the same to the Western Australian Planning Commission, and ADVISES submitters of its decision;
4. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the duly modified Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Structure Plan No. 83 documents and AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL the documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
5. ADVISES the owners of Lot 204 Breakwater Drive; and Lots 205, 206, 207 and 208 Shearwater Drive, Two Rocks, that it REQUIRES the preparation of a single Centre Structure Plan for the entire area highlighted in Attachment 8 to coordinate development, with particular emphasis on transportation and access, employment opportunity and desired design outcomes, as a prerequisite to Council’s support for any application to subdivide land and Council’s consideration of any application for development within that area, pursuant to Clause 9.1.1 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Attachments:
1. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Lot 204 Breakwater Drive |
11/88897 |
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Advertised LSP 83 - Lot 204 Breakwater Drive |
11/86895 |
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - List of submittors from Government Agencies |
11/88687 |
|
4. |
Attachment 4 - Schedule of Submissions - Government Agencies |
11/47736 |
Minuted |
5. |
Attachment 5 - Administration comment during advertising for Lot 204 Breakwater Drive LSP |
11/84294 |
Minuted |
6. |
Attachment 6 - Comments on LWMS for lot 204 LSP 83 |
11/85070 |
Minuted |
7. |
Attachment 7 - Amended LSP 83 Part 1 Lot 204 Breakwater Drive |
11/86912 |
|
8. |
Attachment 8 - Two Rocks Secondary Centre Map |
11/88895 |
Minuted |
Summary of Submissions Received on draft Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83
No. |
Name. |
Summary of Submission |
Administration Response/Comment |
Recommended Modification |
1.0 |
Western Power |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Western Power has reviewed the document and has no objections to the proposal. |
Noted. |
No Modification Required. |
2.0 |
Dept of Indigenous Affairs (DIA) |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
The archaeologist survey supporting LSP 83 is outdated as it was conducted in 1991. Further ethnographic surveys are to be conducted. |
As per the modification for 11.7 above the legislation which controls the investigation and preservation of Indigenous Heritage sites is under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. As per modification 11.7 above it is considered appropriate to remind the proponent of their responsibilities under this legislation. |
Modify Part 1 – Plan to include a notation which states: “The following obligations under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 are recognised and will be implemented in the development of the site:
• Protect and report any unregistered Aboriginal heritage sites, and • Prevent disturbance to any Aboriginal heritage sites without prior consent under Section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act from the Minister of Indigenous Affairs.
In the event that any sites of significance are discovered, appropriate management strategies shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with the Act.” Based on the above modification it is recommended that the modification 2.2 be altered to ‘No modification required. |
2.2 |
|
The Environmental Assessment for LSP 83 does not discuss the specific heritage management plan in sufficient detail. |
As per the reason for 2.1 the requirement for a Heritage Management Strategy does not fall under Legislation the City can enforce. |
No modification required. |
2.3 |
|
It is suggested that in light of potential sub-surface cultural material or skeletal remains that may be uncovered during any ground works that a cultural material contingency plan is developed and adopted prior to any works commencing. |
Agreed. |
As per response to 2.2. |
3.0 |
Water Corporation |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
There is insufficient information provided on the land use intensity for the LSP area. Information in the form of an R – Code plan and further information on the Mixed Use Frame and Northern Town Centre is required in order that infrastructure scheme planning can be made available when required by development. |
Partially agree. A further structure plan will be required for the Centre zone therefore infrastructure needs can be assessed at that time. |
Modify Part 2 to include a land allocation table including the densities of the residential and mixed use zones. |
3.2 |
|
Item 5 of Table A should add the item “Mechanism to ensure planning intentions for water efficiency are faithfully translated to practice”. |
Disagree. The provisions of water efficiency are provided as part of the LWMS and UWMP therefore this does not need to be in Part 1. |
No Modification Required. |
3.3 |
|
Section 1.2, Planning Context, should include reference to Directions 2031 and the Outer Metropolitan Perth and Peel Sub-regional Strategy. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 2 – Section 1.2 to include Sub-regional context (including reference to Directions 2031 and the Outer Metropolitan Perth and Peel Sub-regional Strategy). |
3.4 |
|
Section 10.2.4, (second dot point) introduce the words ‘and water efficient’ to read Introducing incentives through the development control process to encourage the delivery of solar passive and water efficient outcomes. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 2 – Section 10.2.4 – Second dot point - to be amended to include the words ‘and water efficient’. |
3.5 |
|
It is recommended that a new section, 10.4, be included that shows staging of land areas and likely timing of development so that planning for infrastructure can be undertaken without causing delays. Section 14 includes long term conceptual plans but will not be fulfilled fully for several decades. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 2 – A new section to be included (10.4) that shows the staging of land areas and predicted timing for development. |
3.6 |
|
With regard to 14.2.2 the Water Corporation long term plan include servicing LSP 83 through two large pump stations. Since timing of development is not known these works are currently not planned for the short to medium term. Any early stages of development would require temporary servicing to be established through the coastal system at Two Rocks town site. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 2 – Section 14.2.2 to include the words “Currently this work is not planned for the short to medium term. Any servicing to be established through the coastal system at Two Rocks”. |
3.7 |
|
With regard to 14.2.3 The Water Corporation long term plan shows major infrastructure will be required to serve the area. As per sewer, development staging will impact the requirement for temporary provision of water through Two Rocks town site. |
Agreed |
Modify Part 2 – Section 14.2.3 to include the words “Currently this work is not planned for the short to medium term. Any servicing to be established through the coastal system at Two Rocks”. |
|
|
Part 3 – Technical Appendices |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Appendix 6 – The LWMS should aim to meet the objectives of Better Urban Water Management referred to in State Water Plan including water consumption targets. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 6 to include water consumption targets referred to in the State Water Plan. |
3.9 |
|
Appendix 9 – As per points 3.6 & 3.7 above, significant infrastructure is required and will be dependent on staging of development. |
Noted – This point is covered by 3.6 & 3.7. |
No Modification Required. |
4.0 |
Dept of Education (DoE) |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
The housing Typology & Yield Estimates stated the LSP area has the potential to realise approximately 6500 residential lots and 7,500 dwelling units. CLE have indicated that although there would be higher residential density in town centre precinct it would produce a lower student yield. Should there be an increase in student numbers this would adversely impact the nearest primary school. |
Noted – The City accepts the demographics as presented in the LSP. |
No Modification Required. |
4.2 |
|
With regard to Co-Location of Public Open Space a 3ha primary school site alongside POS is acceptable subject to an agreement with CoW to locate the entirety of the school oval on the abutting POS and there being a suitable agreement in place for the use of the ovals by the primary schools. |
Noted. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
Modify Part 1 structure plan map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
4.3 |
|
The configuration of the site area does not comply with WAPC policy which requires the juxtaposition of the neighbourhood centre and primary school. Any variation from this policy would require approval and negotiation with the DoP. |
Noted. The proposal configured in such a manner to maximise the drainage capacity whilst also retaining landform topography. The proponent has also indicated that the POS can be designed in such a manner to maintain connection between the primary school and the neighbourhood centre. |
No Modification Required. |
5.0 |
Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
The area associated with LSP 83 falls under a significant risk of unexploded ordnance (UXO) contamination. The issue of UXO must be taken into account so that all stakeholders are aware of potential hazards and ensure that the land is searched for UXO prior to any earthworks for development. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 - Table J to include an “Unexploded ordnance survey” for approval at subdivision stage. |
6.0 |
Department of Transport (DOT) |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
The Local Structure Plan is not consistent with the District Structure Plan approved November 2010. |
Noted. The road layout closely follows the DSP, however, the variations occur within the proposed centre zone which is proposed to be dealt with under a Centre Structure Plan (CSP). This matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
No Modification Required. |
6.2 |
|
The assessment year for development stage traffic forecasts for the LSP is not provided and needs to be clarified. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 3 to include the year of assessment of the development stage traffic forecasts. |
6.3 |
|
The LSP indicates no direct road link proposed between Shearwater Avenue and the main internal road. This would impose additional pressure to Breakwater Drive as well as the intersection of Shearwater Avenue and Breakwater Drive. |
Noted. The road links proposed will be incorporated into the CSP area as per administration comment 6.1. |
No Modification Required. |
6.4 |
|
The detail of the road reservation should be indicated in the statutory report. |
Disagree. The road reservations are already provided in Part 2 and are not required in Part 1 under the City’s LPP 4.2. |
No Modification Required. |
|
|
The proposed 24m and 28m wide road reservation requirement for Neighbourhood Connector, and Integrator B suggested in the traffic report are inconsistent with Liveable Neighbourhood Policy requirements. |
Disagree. The road reservations meet the requirements of Liveable Neighbourhood Policy |
No Modification Required. |
6.5 |
|
An intersection control plan and intersection performance analysis (as provided in Part 3) should be included in the statutory report. |
Disagree. Controlled intersections are already provided in Part 1 LSP plan indicating full movement intersections and left in left out intersections. |
No Modification Required. |
6.6 |
|
Along Shearwater Avenue, three signalised intersections are proposed within 650 metre contrary to Austroads which states a minimum spacing of 500m between two traffic signal controlled intersections is required. The future light rail along this route will be affected by this arrangement. |
Noted. The proposed signalised intersections fall within the Two Rocks Secondary Centre which will be assessed as a separate CSP. |
No Modification Required. |
6.7 |
|
The road network shown in the access control plan is inconsistent with that in the final structure plan. |
Noted. The differences in the road layout only relate to the Centre zone which will be dealt with as part of the CSP. |
No Modification Required. |
6.8 |
|
All signalised intersections should also be spaced in accordance with liveable neighbourhood Policy Element 2. Table 5 and Table 5A (Junction Spacing and Signalised Junction Spacing). |
Noted. The differences in the road layout only relate to the Centre zone which will be dealt with as part of the CSP. |
No Modification Required. |
6.9 |
|
The proposed rail alignment is shown along the Mitchell Freeway reserve in the District Structure Plan however the current MRS indicated the reservation runs along the western boundary of the subject site. |
Noted. The rail alignment does not impact the LSP area. |
No Modification Required. |
7.0 |
Taylor Burrell Barnett |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
A letter objecting to the layout of the major roads was received but later withdrawn after discussions with the proponent |
Noted. |
No Modification Required. |
8.0 |
Main Roads WA |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Marmion Avenue terminates at the Two Rocks CBD whilst advice was given to the District Structure Plan that this road should continue north into South Guilderton communities. |
Disagree. Marmion Avenue is not proposed to be included within the LSP area therefore is not considered applicable. |
No Modification Required. |
8.2 |
|
The Local Structure Plan is not consistent with the District Structure Plan approved November 2010. |
As per administration response 6.1. |
No Modification required. |
8.3 |
|
The assessment year for development stage traffic forecasts for the LSP is not provided and needs to be clarified. |
Agreed. |
Modification as per 6.2. |
8.4 |
|
Further clarification is required with Public Transport Authority (PTA) for the intended rail alignment. |
As per administration comment 6.9. |
No Modification Required. |
8.5 |
|
No intersection performance analysis was provided with the traffic report. Spacing between signalised intersections should be as per Austroads or Liveable Neighbourhoods. |
Agreed. |
No Modification Required. |
8.6 |
|
A district traffic study is required to determine which roads should be considered District Distributor Roads (both types A & B). The determination of the district road network is required before any further comments can be made. |
Disagree. A district level traffic study was undertaken as part of the assessment of the DSP. |
No Modification Required. |
9.0 |
Department of Water (DoW) |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
The LSP should not be finalised prior to the endorsement of the LWMS by the City of Wanneroo and the DoW. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
Modify Appendix 6 to be amended as per Attachment 6. |
9.2 |
|
Section 4.4 of the LWMS provides the total amount of water needed for irrigation as 245,000 kl/yr. Groundwater availability in this area is extremely limited and therefore the requirements for irrigated Public Open Space (POS) should be reconsidered in consultation with the City of Wanneroo. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
No Modification Required. |
9.3 |
|
Section 5.1 of the LWMS states the 1 in 500 ARI storm events have been designed for. Only 1 in 100 ARI storm events are required. |
Noted. This comment is for information only. |
No Modification Required. |
9.4 |
|
Bio-retention swales (raingardens) may not be necessary for this site and should be reconsidered. |
Disagree. Bio-retention gardens may be utilised under certain circumstances which can be determined at a later more detailed design stage. |
No Modification Required. |
9.5 |
|
Gross Pollutant Traps are not supported by the DoW and should be reconsidered. |
Disagree. Gross Pollutant Traps may be utilised under certain circumstances which can be determined at a later more detailed design stage. |
No Modification Required. |
10.0 |
Department of Planning (DoP) (Received after completion of advertising) |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
The Yanchep Two-Rocks DSP incorporates a number of reports/strategies that are required. These are to be provided prior to submission to WAPC for endorsement. |
Noted. Through assessment of the LSP it is considered that all relevant reports/strategies have been provided as part of the LSP or required as per Table J & K of Part 1. |
No Modification Required. |
10.2 |
|
Further clarification is required to the difference between the Community Development Strategy submitted as part of the LSP and the Community Development Plan to be submitted at subdivision stage. |
Noted. The Community development plan is to be compiled based on the community development strategy and will be a more detailed document relating specifically to the areas being subdivided. |
No Modification Required. |
10.3 |
|
The servicing plan being removed from Part 2, Table 2. |
Agree. The Servicing plan is required as part of subdivision. |
Modify Part 2 –Table 2 to remove Servicing plan. |
10.4 |
|
It is recommended that the City of Wanneroo adopts the LSP with an approved LWMS prior to submission to the WAPC for endorsement. |
Disagree. LPP 4.2 outlines the process for referral to the WAPC which includes sending a list of modifications. In this instance the modifications are incorporated in Attachment 6. |
No Modification Required. |
10.5 |
|
The LSP plans are to be combined into one plan. The residential density’s are also to be associated with the R-code bands of medium density (R30 – R60) or high density (R80 – R160) |
Agreed. The plan is to be incorporated into one plan amending the R-coding bands as required. This will increase the density range of the medium density range from R30 – R60 to R30 – R80 and the high density range from R60 – R80 to R80 – R160. |
Modify Part 1 structure plan map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
10.6 |
|
The LSP incorporates 13.76 dwellings per hectare which is inconsistent with the WAPC’s Directions 2031. |
Agreed. However with the increased density as mentioned in 10.5 above, the proposed density increases to 15.6 dwelling per hectare which meets the DoP requirements. |
No Modification Required. |
10.7 |
|
Further investigation is required for the provision of dual use paths passing through large roundabouts on Breakwater Drive and along north-south road on western edge of the LSP area. |
Noted. Further consideration for the duel use paths will be undertaken at subdivision stage. |
No Modification Required. |
10.8 |
|
Calculation of POS is to be in accordance of Liveable Neighbourhoods specifically related to restricted and unrestricted POS. |
Agreed. A plan should be provided to incorporate the restricted and unrestricted open space in accordance with Liveable Neighbourhoods and LPP 4.3. |
Modify Part 2 POS schedule to include the locations of restricted and unrestricted POS in accordance with Liveable Neighbourhoods. |
10.9 |
|
The LSP proposes 74% employment self-sufficiency contrary to the 75% as stipulated by the DSP. |
Disagree. The 75% employment self sufficiency is required for the entire DSP area. The self sufficiency is established through the retail floor space targets required by the DSP. LSP 83 has provided excess retail floorspace than required by the DSP therefore the employment for the area will be met. |
No Modification Required. |
10.10 |
|
The LSP identifies a ‘District/Neighbourhood Centre’ which is inconsistent with the DSP which identifies this as a ‘Neighbourhood Centre’. |
Agreed. |
Modify the entire LSP, including Part 1, Part 2 and the technical appendices, to replace the title ‘Eastern District/Neighbourhood Centre ‘with ‘Eastern Neighbourhood Centre’. |
10.11 |
|
The LSP proposes an indicative maximum retail floor space of 6100sqm for the south-eastern Neighbourhood Centre contrary to 5600sqm as identified in the DSP. |
Disagree. The DSP states that the LSP should generally be in accordance with table I (5600sqm). It is considered that the 500sqm increase has been justified through appendix 5 ( Economic & Employment Analysis & Strategy) and will not have significant impact on employment in the surrounding area. |
No Modification Required. |
10.12 |
|
The LSP proposes a local centre of 1500sqm NLA contrary to the DSP which states that generally local centres should be less than 1000sqm NLA. |
Disagree. As per response to 10.11 the DSP states that Local Centres should ‘generally’ be under 1000sqm NLA however SPP 4.2 indicates that they can go up to 1,500sqm NLA |
No Modification Required. |
10.13 |
|
No fauna survey has been undertaken to establish if there is Graceful Sun Moth within the LSP area. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with below in comments from Department of Environment and Conservation |
No Modification Required |
10.14 |
|
The proposed primary school sites are inconsistent with the minimum site requirements for Liveable Neighbourhoods. |
Disagree. The proposal has been agreed to by the Department of Education. |
No Modification Required. |
11.0 |
Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (Received after completion of advertising) |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
The proposal was subject to conditional approval by Environmental Protection Authority for the Amendment 878 to Town Planning Scheme No 1. The imposition of ministerial conditions is the responsibility of the City. |
Agreed. The ministerial conditions have been dealt with in Part 2 – Table 1. |
No Modification Required |
11.2 |
|
The proposal does not include any delineation between the conservation and other types of open space. |
Agreed. Since completion of advertising the proponent has completed a plan indicating conservation POS. |
Modify Part 2 to incorporate a public open space plan identifying a minimum of 14.7ha of conservation public open space as per the City’s LPP 4.2. |
11.3 |
|
Clear delineation is required between the LSP site and the Bush forever site 284 and 406 and a Bush Forever Management Plan is required to develop and implement the specifications of DEC. |
Noted. This matter has been identified in Appendix 1 with recommendations to be incorporated into subdivision and development stages. |
No Modification Required. |
11.4 |
|
Limited detail has been provided to determine the final earthwork levels between the development and adjacent reserves. DEC recommend that the natural ground levels adjacent to the proposed road interface be retained. |
Noted. A Cut and Fill plan has been provided in Part 2 and further assessment on the impact on the adjoining property will be undertaken at subdivision stage. |
No Modification Required. |
11.5 |
|
A dieback management plan is required to ensure no impact on the adjacent conservation areas. |
Noted. This matter can be dealt with through adequate conditions of subdivision of lots adjoining conservation areas. |
No Modification Required. |
11.6 |
|
The drainage strategy plan allows for discharge of stormwater onto adjacent bushforever sites which is not supported. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 6 (Drainage Strategy) to remove any discharge of stormwater onto adjoining properties. |
11.7 |
|
The proposal does not incorporate a targeted survey for the Graceful Sun Moth which may impact the design of the local structure plan. |
The requirement to investigate and conserve the Graceful Sun Moth falls under separate legislation enforced by the Federal Government (Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and cannot be enforced through a LSP. The matter is the responsibility of the proponent. It is therefore considered appropriate to deal with this issue in a manner consistent with other structure plans and provide a notation on the Part 1 plan which reminds the proponent of any responsibility to meet the Federal Government requirements. |
Modify Part 1 Plan to include a notation which states: ‘Areas identified as being of National Environmental Significance under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 may be subject to assessment by the Federal Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, in accordance with this Act. The outcome of any such assessment may require either a modification to the LSP or minor variations from the LSP at the subdivision or development stage. |
11.8 |
|
The proponent is required to notify the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities regarding their obligations under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation 1999 (EPBC). |
Noted. The proponent is aware of this requirement which cannot be enforced under the Planning and Development Act 2005 |
No Modification Required. |
11.9 |
|
Due to the location in proximity to Bushforever sites a fire management plan is required which will incorporate prescribed burning. Notification in the form of a section 70A is to be placed on lots advising of the close proximity to bushforever sites and that actions to retain the environment such as burning, baiting and application of chemicals will be undertaken. |
Noted. However a condition requiring a section 70A notification can be applied by the DEC at subdivision stage rather than at LSP stage. |
No Modification Required. |
Summary of City of Wanneroo Administration Assessment on draft Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83
No. |
Summary of Submission |
Administration Response/Comment |
Recommended Modification |
1.0 |
Part 1 Text |
|
|
1.1 |
The title of the LSP is to be changed so that it is not named after the Lot. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
Modify the entire LSP, including Part 1, Part 2 and the technical appendices, to replace the title ‘Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan’ with ‘East Two Rocks Local Structure Plan’. |
1.2 |
The Residential Density Requirements, specifically Part 1, Table A, subclause 3.5.1 b) and 3.5.2 b), should be more specific and state that a density code of RXX “shall” be applied to lots located: i)….ii)…iii)… |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.3 |
Part 1, Table A, subclause 5.1 are not statutory provisions, but are more akin to objectives. Where this is the case, these subclauses should be deleted. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.4 |
The LSP must be updated and amended to reference and be consistent with the final Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP, not the draft forwarded to the WAPC, as is currently the case. |
Agreed. |
Modify the entire LSP, including Part 1, Part 2 and the technical appendices, to replace the reference to the approved Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP rather than the Draft. |
1.5 |
DAP’s should be required for all centres, including local centres; and prior to subdivision, in accordance with the City’s LPP 4.2.
|
Agreed. This requirement will ensure consistent approach to the entire district/neighbourhood/local centres. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.6 |
An appropriate mechanism should be included setting out the maximum Net Lettable Area (NLA) as per clause 3.7.4 of DPS2. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.7 |
The maximum retail floorspace must be provided for each centre in accordance with Clause 3.7.3 of DPS 2 and the City’s Structure Planning Policy. Replace “Indicative Nett Lettable Area” with ‘Maximum Net Lettable Area’ in Tables E – H. The Maximum Retail Floorspace should be the Indicative Retail figure included for each centre in Tables E – H, as these comply with the figure included in the Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP, except for Centre E which should be at least 2,100, in accordance with the DSP. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.8 |
A Minimum ‘Mix of Land Use’ net lettable area to be demonstrated, must be provided for each centre, in accordance with the City’s Structure Planning Policy and this should replace the ‘Indicative Net Lettable Area’ for ‘Commercial’, ‘Community/Health/Education’ and ‘Total’ currently provided. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
1.8 |
The Northern Town Centre should be referred to as the Two Rocks Secondary Centre in accordance with the Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP. |
Agreed. |
Modify the entire LSP, including Part 1, Part 2 and the technical appendices, to replace the title ‘Northern Town Centre’ with ‘Two Rocks Secondary Centre’. |
1.9 |
The Eastern District/Neighbourhood Centre should be referred to and classified as the Eastern Neighbourhood Centre in accordance with the Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP. |
Agreed. |
Modify the entire LSP, including Part 1, Part 2 and the technical appendices, to replace the title ‘Eastern District/Neighbourhood Centre ‘with ‘Eastern Neighbourhood Centre’. |
2.0 |
Part 1 Map |
|
|
2.1 |
The size of the co-located Primary School / POS precincts are considered to be too small or at most the bare minimum required to allow organised sporting activity. As per LPP4.3, sufficient space needs to be allowed to permit a senior sized oval (including 4m safety runoff), plus space to allow for a sloping site if applicable, buffers to roads, drainage, carparking, any built facilities and passive recreational space. It needs to be demonstrated how this will be achieved on the spaces indicated before they can be supported as proposed. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
Modify Part 1 structure plan map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
2.2 |
The proposal incorporates a north-south neighbourhood connector, originating at the Two Rocks Secondary Centre, however has no distinct destination. This road should be amended to incorporate the local centre as a final destination. |
Agreed. |
Modify Part 1 structure plan map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
2.3 |
The proposal should allow for the ability to provide non-residential uses on a small scale surrounding the active open space. |
Agreed. The inclusion of a mixed use zone will provide reciprocal use with the active open space (POS E) as well as provide for increased passive surveillance of the park. |
Modify Part 1 structure plan map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
3.0 |
Environmental Assessment (Appendix 1) |
|
|
3.1 |
It is important that conservation reserves are created and that they are vested for the purpose of conservation. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report.
|
Modify Part 1 Public Open Space Strategy map in accordance with the revised version of Part 1 included as Attachment 7. |
3.2 |
It is unclear when the vegetation association, floristic community type (FCT) or vegetation condition mapping was undertaken. This should be clarified and a map of the FCTs should be provided. The adequacy of this survey is to be confirmed by the Department of Environment and Conservation. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 1, Subclause 4.5.2 to include a map of floristic community type (FCT) or vegetation condition. |
3.3 |
Retention of the vegetation section (4.5.2) should include a map of the vegetation to be retained including: · Area values in hectares; · Known significant natural assets and how/where/if these will be retained. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 1, Subclause 4.5.2 to include a map of vegetation to be retained including · Area values in hectares; · Known significant natural assets and how/where/if these will be retained. |
3.4 |
An ecological viability assessment should also be undertaken for each conservation area to be retained (as required by the provisions of the DSP). |
The proposed modification was originally included to ensure the Conservation Public Open Space required would be worthy of retention. The modification requires the Ecological Viability Assessment at subdivision stage, however, this timing would not allow any modifications should it be found that the conservation POS is not worthy of retention. |
Modify Appendix 1 to include a “Ecological Viability Assessment”. |
3.5 |
The River Red Gums that have been planted in the southern area of the site should be retained wherever possible. Earthwork designs should consider the retention of these trees as their inclusion in the urban landscape will add values such as amenity and shade. This should also apply to any of the other trees and vegetation that can be retained across the entire site where they are not located in POS. |
Noted. The River Red Gums are located within the Northern Town Centre which will be considered as a Centre Structure Plan. |
No Modification Required. |
3.6 |
Prior to subdivision and earthworks approval, a plan should be submitted detailing the vegetation that can be retained on site. Add this requirement to Table J in Part 1 of the LSP. |
The proponent sought clarification as to the requirements of this modification. After discussion it was agreed that in lieu of two management plans being prepared, that one consolidated ‘Landscape Management Plan’ could be prepared and assessed at subdivision stage provided that it included both a vegetation retention plan and conservation reserve management plan where applicable. |
Modify Part 1 – Table J to include a Landscape Management Plan for approval at subdivision stage. This Plan is also to include a vegetation retention plan and conservation management plan where applicable. |
3.7 |
Further to the management strategies listed, management plans for conservation reserves should also be produced prior to subdivision. These plans should provide further detail on how the vegetation will be retained and protected through the earthworking and development process. Management plans should also identify trees and any other vegetation that will be retained and management strategies for doing so. |
As per the reason for Modification 3.6. |
As per modification to 3.6. |
4.0 |
Traffic and Movement (Appendix 2/3) |
|
|
4.1 |
The alignment Transport Network shown throughout the LSP is not consistent with the Yanchep-Two Rocks DSP. The DSP provides only an indicative transport network for the areas, which is to be further refined through local structure plans and MRS amendments. However, the LSP does not reflect the intent of the DSP. |
Agreed. The inconsistencies with the LSP 83 and DSP are located within the Two Rocks Secondary Centre. As discussed in the body of the report this centre will be dealt with by a Centre Structure Plan which will deal with all transport issues. |
No Modification Required. |
5.0 |
Employment & Community Development (Appendix 5 & 7) |
|
|
5.1 |
District and regional facilities will be determined once the Developer Contribution Plan and Community Infrastructure Plan are finalised. No information is provided regarding future consultation or community engagement strategies. |
Agreed. Whilst the Community Development Plan outlines information in relation to current forecasts further information will be required and constantly updated to ensure the community facilities being provided match that of the District and regional facilities. |
Modify Part 1 - Table J to include a “Community development implementation strategy” for approval at subdivision stage.
Modify Appendix 5 to include reference to the Community development implementation strategy. |
6.0 |
Local Water Management Strategy (Appendix 6) |
|
|
6.1 |
The LWMS is to be amended as per comments received from the City of Wanneroo Engineers and Department of Water. |
|
Modify Appendix 6 as per Attachment 6 |
6.2 |
The LWMS states that 245,000kL/yr is required for public open space irrigation, however, no bore licence has been applied for and it is known that the groundwater in the Yanchep-Two Rocks area is almost fully allocated. Further detail is therefore required as to how much water is available in the area. |
Agreed. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the body of the report. |
No Modification Required. |
7.0 |
Engineering Services (Appendix 9) |
|
|
7.1 |
Typical earthworks plan with typical section to be provided. |
Agreed. |
Modify Appendix 9 to include a typical earthworks (cut and fill) plan with typical sections. |
Recommended Modifications for Local Water Management Strategy (LWMS) for Lot 204 Breakwater Drive Local Structure Plan No. 83
No. |
Recommended Modification |
1.0 |
City of Wanneroo |
1.1 |
Section 2.4 should include provision for further geotechnical investigation into the karst areas. This investigation should be the basis for any decision on the final locations of infiltration basins and is to be noted as such. |
1.2 |
Section 3.3.3 The drainage calculations and basins sizes are to be re-modelled based on the runoff from the 10% of developed lot area being added to the area flowing into basins for 1 in 100 year storm. |
1.3 |
The retention of the 1 in 10 year event in the swale located within road reserves is not acceptable except where abutting Bush Forever and shall be removed from the LWMS. Road swales are designed to retain and treat 1 in 1 year ARI events only. |
1.4 |
Section 5.1 – Catchment Scale, bullet point 1 shall be amended to incorporate a desirable 1 in 8 side slope and the maximum inundation depth for a 1 in 100 ARI storm should be no more than 1200mm. |
1.5 |
Section 5.1 – Catchment Scale, bullet point 4 shall also state that Gross Pollutant Traps downstream will not be required if 2% of Equivalent Impervious Area (EIA) is provided as bio-retention swale upstream within catchment. |
1.6 |
Section 5.1 – Catchment Scale, bullet point 5 shall include the following statement at the end of the final sentence of the paragraph ‘with the exception of all trapped low points adjoining infrastructure or development which require 1m free board. |
1.7 |
Section 5.1– Street Scale, bullet point 6 shall be amended to read ‘Side entry pits will include weepholes to allow infiltration info the soil below. Locations of Weepholes are to be determined through the Urban Water Management Plan’ |
1.8 |
The table presented in the drainage management strategy (appendix 7) needs to be enlarged to improve legibility. |
1.9 |
Section 5.2 – Area 1 - The overflow from larger events (greater than 1 in 10 years ARI) to adjoining lot on boundary catchments is not acceptable. The drainage calculations and basin sizes are to be re-modelled based on this. |
1.10 |
The LWMS shall include a concept stormwater management strategy with calculation and modelling. |
1.11 |
The LWMS shall include a typical detail of infiltration and bio-retention devices proposed including section detail. |
1.12 |
The LWMS shall include a plan showing the indicative locations of bio-retention areas to be shown in plan. |
1.13 |
The LWMS shall include a pre development contour plan. |
2.0 |
Department of Water |
2.1 |
Section 1.1 should provide MRS zoning information. |
2.2 |
Section 1.2 should provide approval status of the LSP. |
2.3 |
Section 2.5 should state that the site lies within the Perth Coastal Underground Water Pollution Control Area and the Yanchep Groundwater Area, proclaimed under the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act (1914), not the Gnangara Mound. |
2.4 |
Section 2.5 should also acknowledge that the majority of the site is located within a Priority 3 area. |
2.5 |
Section 2.5 should incorporate that a Wellhead Protection Zone is partly within the site, on the western boundary. |
2.6 |
Section 2.5, the second bullet point should state whether septic tanks are required, and if not this point should be omitted as it is not applicable. |
2.7 |
Section 3.3.3, the design criteria 5, 7, 8, 14, and 15 listed are not applicable to this site, therefore should be deleted. |
2.8 |
Section 4.4 should include a more detailed breakdown of active and passive Public Open Space water requirements. |
2.9 |
Section 4.4 should include the irrigation requirements for POS shared with school ovals. |
2.10 |
Section 5.1 refers to 'overflow into adjacent areas' in regards to retention areas. The term adjacent areas should be explained i.e. On or offsite, and how this will be managed, and if agreement with neighbouring land owners has been granted (also in section 5.2). |
2.11 |
Section 5.1 does not refer to the 1 in 5 ARI storm event. This section should indicate if these events are to be conveyed by the pipe network. |
2.12 |
Section 5.1 should provide greater clarification on which systems (e.g. swales, grassed or bio-retention, underground storage) will be used, where they will be located and detail their function. |
2.13 |
The location of grassed swales should be specified. |
2.14 |
Section 5.1 should indicate where underground structures will be located and whether the City of Wanneroo supports these structures. |
2.15 |
Section 5.1 should provide more information on the proposed 'StormTech' system. |
2.16 |
Section 5.1 should provide more information on 'walled infiltration basins', particularly whether they will be used, where they will be located and their storage volume. |
2.17 |
Section 6.2.2 – the duration of the post development monitoring should be consistent with handover of public open space to the City. |
2.18 |
The Landscape Masterplan (Appendix 6) appears to show a waterbody, however, it is not labelled. The proponent should confirm that the POS will not include any waterbodies. |
2.19 |
The Drainage Plan (Appendix 7) should be split so that the 1 in 1 year and 1 in 100 year events are not shown on the same plan. |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 165
PS05-08/11 Final Adoption of Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Proposed Local Reserve 'Conservation' Classification and Associated Change in Vesting
File Ref: 2968 – 11/83079
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the final adoption of Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and associated change in vesting following public advertising.
Background
Administration presented a proposal to 1 June 2010 Council meeting to add a new reserve classification titled ‘Conservation’ to DPS 2. The ‘Conservation’ classification was proposed to be applied to all reserves currently managed as conservation sites for their environmental value or included in a Council endorsed offset package.
Council considered the proposal and resolved as follows (refer Item PS06-06/10):
“That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to introduce a new local reserve classification titled ‘Conservation’ and apply the ‘Conservation’ reserve classification to various local reserves throughout the City of Wanneroo, as depicted on the Scheme (Amendment) Maps as contained in Attachment 1;
2. REFERS Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005; should the EPA advise that the Amendment does not require assessment, ADVERTISES the Amendment for public comment for a period of 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 25(2) of the Town Planning Regulations 1967;
3. FORWARDS a copy of Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
4. SEEKS formal agreement from the Federal Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and the State Department of Environment and Conservation that sites classified through Amendment No. 109 as ‘Conservation’ can be used to offset future clearing of vegetation and protected species habitat where they do not already form part of an agreed offset proposal.”
In reviewing the detailed requirements for advertising, it was identified that in order to change a reserve from Public Recreation, Council must have specifically addressed the change of purpose of the Management Order for the affected reserves, in addition to the change of zoning, and that this would require a similar public advertising process to the Scheme Amendment. To avoid duplicating the advertising process and thus save costs, advertising of the proposed Scheme Amendment and change to the Management Order were to be pursued concurrently.
This proposal was considered by Council at its meeting on 19 October 2010 (refer Item CS07-10/10) where it was resolved:
“That Council:-
1. NOTES and SUPPORTS the change in purpose of the Management Orders for the Reserves listed in Attachment 2 to ‘Conservation and Passive Recreation”;
2. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to advertise the City’s intention to change the purpose of the Management Orders for public comment for a period of at least 35 days in accordance with the Department of Regional Development and Lands policy; and
3. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council at the conclusion of the advertising period which will address the changes in both the zoning and vesting of the Reserves.”
Detail
The proposal comprises the following components:
Amendment of the Scheme Map in DPS 2 to create a new local reserve classification titled ‘Conservation’
Land reserved as ‘Conservation’ under the Scheme will be for the principal function of conservation purposes.
It is important to note that this classification will only designate the principal use or purpose of the reserve as conservation and will in no way alter or restrict public access to and enjoyment of these natural areas. Conservation reserves generally allow managed access for passive recreation such as walk trails, lookouts, picnics, nature appreciation and interpretation into areas for which the primary purpose is conservation.
Amendment of the classification of designated local reserves in DPS 2
Attachment 1 details the proposed changes to the Scheme Map with respect to those local reserves identified for reclassification as a ‘Conservation’ reserve. This involves either reclassifying their current reservation or reserving the land to ‘Conservation’.
There are 53 reserves identified in Attachment 1 and proposed to be depicted on the Scheme Map as ‘Conservation’ reserves. The combined area of all these sites is approximately 191ha. The reserves proposed to be classified as ‘Conservation’ reserves were chosen to protect:
· Vegetation in good condition;
· Significant fauna habitat;
· Rare and endangered species; and
· Areas that can be rehabilitated as part of offset proposals.
The creation of the new ‘Conservation’ reserve will also enable developers to more easily meet their obligations under State and Federal legislation (by designating newly created reserves as ‘Conservation’ reserves) and ensure remnant pockets of vegetation are protected as the City is urbanised.
All other local reserves not affected by the Amendment will remain as ‘Parks and Recreation’ and will continue to be available for all other principal functions of public open space that are not predominantly for conservation purposes such as active sport, unstructured recreation, amenity, or drainage.
Consultation
In accordance with the Council’s decision, the Amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment. On 26 July 2010, the EPA advised the City that the Amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. The WAPC’s consent to advertise was not required in this case.
Advertising for public comment was undertaken for a period of 42 days between 24 May 2011 and 4 July 2011 by way of on-site signs, advertisements in the local newspaper and a notice in Council offices, public libraries and on the City’s website.
The City received fourteen submissions in total, comprising two objections and twelve non-objections to the proposed Amendment. Of these submissions, two specifically mentioned their support for the change in vesting while none specifically opposed the change in vesting.
A summary of the comments received and Administration’s recommendation on each is set out in Attachment 2.
Comment
Non-Objections
The majority of the submissions were in support of, or provided no opposition to the proposed Amendment and, by association, the change to the management order of affected reserves. The main reason given for the support of the Amendment was that it was an effective way of formally recognising the conservation status of some reserves in the local planning framework and offering better protection for local bushland.
Despite a high level of support for the Amendment and change in vesting, a number of issues were raised by submitters in relation to operational matters associated with conservation sites such as litter, unauthorised access and ongoing management regimes. While these issues are important, they do not affect the progression of the Scheme Amendment and change in vesting. Such matters are regularly dealt with by conservation maintenance crews as part of their regular visits to conservation sites.
Objections
Those submissions that did not support the Amendment did so for the following reasons:
· Once the land goes to conservation there is no prospect of it accommodating various community groups, clubs and sheltered outdoor leisure activities. The parks should be kept as general purpose parks with small areas of special significance preserved within.
The main aim of the proposed Amendment is to protect conservation areas in perpetuity and as a result, some uses will be restricted. However, those conservation areas that consist entirely of remnant bushland would be unavailable for such uses, regardless of the reclassification, because of the sensitive, threatened or rare nature of the vegetation and habitat present. As outlined in the ‘detail’ section above, conservation reserves generally allow managed access for passive recreation and some appropriate low impact development.
All other community uses may continue to be enjoyed on other ‘Parks and Recreation’ reserves not affected by this Amendment.
· Conservation reserves are often fenced off. The land should be kept open with some time and money spent ensuring that it is available for all to use and enjoy.
Some conservation reserves are fenced to minimise the edge effects of weeds, litter, feral animals and erosion that can occur when left open. It is not the intention of the reclassification to restrict community access and enjoyment. It is current practice to control access to these reserves by allowing access in specific defined areas. The City will continue to progressively improve and upgrade these reserves as resources allow in accordance with the annual capital works program.
Proposed Changes to Amendment
Administration recommends two changes be made to the Amendment:
1. The submission from the Quinns Rocks Environmental Group highlighted an additional area within Gumblossom Reserve that consists of similar quality banksia woodland to the area proposed to be reclassified within this reserve (refer Attachment 3). This section of the reserve is currently unfenced but is proposed to be fenced and revegetated by the City’s conservation maintenance team over the coming years. It is therefore appropriate for it to be included in the Amendment, consistent with other areas of conservation within Gumblossom Reserve.
2. Since presenting the proposed Amendment to Council in June 2010, the Western Australian Planning Commission gazetted Amendment 1082/33 to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) that reserved a number of bush forever sites across the metropolitan area as ‘Parks and Recreation’ under that Scheme. Included in the list of bush forever sites affected by the above Amendment to the MRS were five reserves proposed to be reclassified to ‘conservation’ included in proposed Amendment No.109:
· Res 6542 - Caporn Park
· Res 36601 - Edgar Griffiths Park
· Res 25489 - Belgrade Park
· Res 36878 - Chicquita Park
· Res 36860 - Benmuni Park
It is a requirement of the MRS that its reservations be reflected in District Planning Schemes, but as regional reservations. The above reserves must therefore be removed from Amendment No. 109.
Considering the matters noted above, it is recommended that Amendment No. 109 proposal be adopted with modifications and forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.1 Improve conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulation 17(2) ADOPTS Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 subject to the following:
a) Inclusion of additional conservation area within Reserve 28376 – Gumblossom Park as shown in Attachment 3; and
b) Deletion of Reserves 6542 and 36601 from Map 5, and Reserves 25489, 36878 and 36860 from Map 6 as shown in Attachment 1;
2. Pursuant to Town Planning Regulations 22 and 25 (a) (g) AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the Amendment documentation;
3. FORWARDS the Amendment documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration REQUESTING the Hon Minister for Planning grant final approval to the Amendment;
4. NOTES the submissions received on Amendment No. 109 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the proposed changes to management orders of reserves affected by this Amendment and includes a summary of those submissions in the schedule of submissions to be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision; and
5. Subject to the final approval of Amendment No. 209 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 by the Hon Minister for Planning, REQUESTS the Hon Minister for Lands to grant final approval to the change in vesting purpose for reserves affected by the Amendment.
Attachments:
1. |
Amendment 109 to DPS 2 - Amendment Maps AS ADVERTISED |
11/84444 |
Minuted |
2. |
Summary of Submissions - Amendment 109 to DPS 2 |
11/76603 |
|
3. |
Amendment to Gumblossom Reserve Conservation Classification Area |
11/85270 |
Minuted |
Amendment 109 to DPS 2: Conservation Reserves
Summary of submissions
|
SUBMITTER |
ISSUE |
RESPONSE |
RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION |
1 |
Les Couzens; Western Power; Maria Schafer; Department of Planning; David Wake; Fiona Grierson; Andre Charlesworth; Department of Environment and Conservation.
|
Support the proposed Amendment No.109.
|
Noted. |
No Change. |
2 |
D Harrison;
|
Regarding the Gumblossum Reserve reclassification, the area on the corner of Gumblossom and Tapping Way is not listed for conservation.
Black Cockatoos are present in this area and bird life has been diminishing since the construction of the bowling club has taken place.
There are also concerns with the resultant weed problem and plants dying in the outlined area.
Would like the area preserved and revitalised as part of this proposal.
|
This area has been excluded from the proposed conservation classification as it already forms part of an area approved for clearing as part of the extension of the Quinns Rocks Bowling Club and associated works. |
No change. |
3 |
David Wake; Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
The Banksia woodland section of Gumblossum Reserve located between the Bowling Club and the Community Centre carpark should have been included in the proposed amendment as it has previously been acknowledged as having conservation value.
|
Agreed. |
Amend Map 4 of the proposed Amendment to include the additional area of bushland within Gumblossom Reserve. |
4 |
Ian H Pinches |
Concerned about the reclassification of Blenny Garden and Longfin Vista. Would like to know why the area is fenced off.
Expects the developer to provide infrastructure for parks. Concerned the reclassification is a “get out” for land developers in supplying adequate POS.
List ways in which the area may be utilized as a park and not a conservation area for utilization by all.
|
Longfin Park is located in close proximity to Blenny Park but is not included in the proposed Amendment. It is a passive park that provides a play opportunity for the surrounding neighbourhood and is especially valuable given that Blenny Park is already a conservation reserve.
Developers are required by State and Local planning policies to ensure that public open space serves a variety of functions including active, passive and conservation.
|
No change. |
5 |
Department of Indigenous Affairs. |
A number of sites identified for conservation are identified as having Aboriginal Heritage significance under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. The remainder of the sites might possibly meet the requirements of an Aboriginal heritage site. |
Noted. The proposed conservation classification will not affect the heritage sites. Rather they should provide additional protection. Should low impact improvements of reserves containing heritage sites be considered in future, they would be unlikely to be proposed where heritage sites exist, and if they are, then would be subject to separate approval concerning the disturbance of heritage sites.
|
No change. |
6 |
Water Corporation. |
Some reserves identified may require vehicular access for maintenance in the future and, hence, will require a land tenure set apart from the conservation zoning. |
The reclassification of reserves to ‘conservation’ will have no effect on the availability of access for maintenance and services. If a reserve currently has vehicular access, it will continue to do so after the amendment has come into effect. For those reserves that do not currently have access for maintenance, the Water Corporation would be required to seek the approval of the Department of Environment and Conservation prior to clearing and this would be the case for both the current ‘parks and recreation’ classification and the proposed ‘conservation’ classification. The Water Corporation is therefore not considered to be negatively affected by the proposed conservation classification.
|
No change. |
7 |
John Faris Clarke. |
Conservation is the same as Bush Forever. Conservation means there is no prospect of rezoning a park for special purposes such as community facilities. The City should consider keeping the parks involved in the Amendment as general purpose with small areas of special significance. The City should also consider more shade trees, beach access, and meeting places.
|
The proposed Conservation classification is very different to Bush Forever which is a State Government initiative to conserve high priority native bushland and is subject to separate approvals for development. The proposed amendment does not change any of the permitted land uses or developments that can occur on the land as they currently stand, other than defining the primary purpose of the reserve as conservation.
|
No change. |
8 |
Department of Planning. |
The City should endeavour to extend and consolidate these reserves wherever possible. |
Further studies may prove to generate extensions or consolidations of the conservation zones in the future.
|
No change. |
9 |
Fiona Grierson; Andre Charlesworth. |
There should be interlinked green belts across all of the metropolitan area, especially in new areas.
|
This is a State planning matter and is outside the scope of the Scheme Amendment. |
No change. |
10 |
Fiona Grierson; Andre Charlesworth. |
None of the conservation areas should be deemed as offset for development in future. Council should be actively pursuing to increase conservation areas not only when offsets are required.
|
The acceptance of the sites as offsets for future clearing is subject to the approval of the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) or the Department of Sustainablity, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.
The City’s Biodiversity Strategy and Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space clearly outline the City’s aim to protect and increase conservation areas where possible.
|
No change. |
11 |
Fiona Grierson; Andre Charlesworth. |
All developments and land clearings should consider the impact on fauna and flora. |
All developments and land clearings are already required to consider this impact by way of a submission to the DEC or, if need be, an environmental impact assessment.
Developers undertaking clearing of land for residential or industrial development are required to undertake a flora and fauna survey as part of the planning process.
|
No change. |
12 |
Fiona Grierson; Andre Charlesworth. |
Clarification is required on what Council intends to do to maintain conservation reserves and protect displaced wildlife. Council and developers should be required to make ongoing financial contributions to wildlife organisations to help achieve this.
|
It is proposed to develop a policy that outlines the management of these reserves and the types of uses and improvements that are considered appropriate. |
No change |
13 |
Douglas Kennedy. |
Cassilda Park, Forrest Grove Park and Whitfield Park require clean ups. The City and volunteers should be the ones to do this.
|
Noted, however this issue is not related to the proposed Amendment. |
No change. |
14 |
Douglas Kennedy. |
Fences should be erected around the above parks to limit vehicle access, especially to deter the use of motor bikes on the reserve.
|
This issue will be addressed as part of the City’s 10-year capital works program. |
No change. |
15 |
Douglas Kennedy. |
Regular inspections by rangers should be conducted on the reservation areas.
|
The City’s conservation maintenance crew regularly visits and inspects the natural areas.
|
No change. |
16 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
Classification criteria should be extended to include threatened and priority ecological communities; and conservation category and resource enhancement wetlands.
|
All developments and land clearings are already required to consider the impact on TEC and CCW by way of a submission to the DEC or, if need be, an environmental impact assessment.
The City’s Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space also requires areas with these characteristics to be set aside as conservation spaces as part of the POS planning process. This will ensure that future conservation reserves are protected under this classification.
|
No change. |
17 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
In regard to Gumblossom Reserve, fragmentation is affecting the ability of the bushland to deal with threats such as weeds and drought.
|
Agreed. The Reserve is included in the City’s weed control program run by conservation maintenance and crews visit the reserve on a regular basis.
|
No change. |
18 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
Provision of walking tracks should be dependent on the size of each reserve.
|
Agreed. The installation of pathways and formalisation of existing dirt tracks would be considered on a case-by-case basis.
|
No change |
19 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
Clear guidelines should exist regarding the types of activities and facilities that are considered compatible with the conservation purpose of the reserves.
|
It is proposed to develop a policy that outlines the management of these reserves and the types of uses and improvements that are considered appropriate.
|
No change |
20 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
More clarity is required as to why some sites were included and others were not, even though they contain vegetation of high conservation value.
|
The sites included in the proposed amendment are those that are already managed by the City as conservation reserves or form part of a Council approved offset package.
It is acknowledged that there are other sites that have conservation value that are not included in the Amendment at this stage. They may be regional reserves, freehold land or land already protected by some other means. These sites have been excluded from the Amendment as there is not need for them to be classified as conservation reserves under DPS 2.
|
No change.
|
21 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
Clarification is sought as to why only five Bush Forever sites are included in the amendment.
|
Eight Bush Forever sites were included in the proposed amendment as advertised (BF sites 284, 129, 327, 397, 471, 470, 469 and 471), however BF sites 469, 470, 471 and 471 will need to be removed from the proposed Amendment as they have recently been reserved as ‘Parks and Recreation’ under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and are no longer considered to be local reserves.
Other Bush Forever sites were not included as they are already reserved as ‘Parks and Recreation’ in the Metropolitan Regional Scheme and are therefore unable to be reclassified.
|
Remove the following reserves from the Amendment maps:
Res 6542 - Caporn Park Res 36601 - Edgar Griffiths Park Res 25489 - Belgrade Park Res 36878 - Chicquita Park Res 36860 - Benmuni Park |
22 |
Quinns Rocks Environmental Group. |
There are many additional sites that appear to fit the criteria for conservation reserve but have not been included in the amendment. |
The decision was made to exclude some sites specifically because of their size, the condition of vegetation present or because of their classification as regional reserves in the Metropolitan Regional Scheme.
However, there is scope to include additional reserves at a later stage should they be considered appropriate. |
No change. |
Development Applications
PS06-08/11 Consideration for Schedule of Colours and Materials - Approved Telecommunications Infrastructure at Lot 39 (294) Pinjar Road, Mariginiup
File Ref: DA10/335 – 11/84390
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the submission of a Schedule of Colours and Materials for Telecommunications Infrastructure in response to a condition of approval provided as an Order from the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT).
Applicant |
Aurecon Group on behalf of Telstra Corporation |
Owner |
Estate of Late Francesco Lenzo |
Location |
Lot 39 (294) Pinjar Road, Mariginiup |
Site Area |
26.7672 Hectares |
DPS 2 Zoning |
Rural Resource |
Background
On 8 March 2010, the Aurecon Group (on behalf of Telstra Corporation) submitted an application to the City for ‘Telecommunications Infrastructure’ at the above property. The location of the proposed ‘Telecommunications Infrastructure’ is illustrated in Attachment 1. Council considered the application at its meeting of 19 October 2010 (PS08-10/10), and resolved as follows:
“That Council REFUSES the application submitted by Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd on behalf of Telstra in accordance with the provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a 40.4 metre monopole and equipment shelter for a mobile telephone base station on Lot 39 (294) Pinjar Road, Mariginiup, for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not comply with the City’s Mobile Telephone Base Station policy in that the proposal is located within 500 metres from sensitive land uses;
2. The proposal is likely to adversely impact on the visual amenity of the locality; and
3. There is local resident opposition to the proposal.”
The applicant was aggrieved by the Council’s decision and lodged an application for review (appeal) with the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT). Following a hearing on 1 February 2011, the SAT handed down its decision on 10 May 2011 and ordered the following:
1. The application for review is allowed.
2. The decision of the City of Wanneroo to refuse the application is set aside and planning approval is granted for the proposed mobile telecommunications facility at No.294 Pinjar Road, Mariginiup, subject to the following condition:
1) A schedule of colours and materials demonstrating that the monopole and equipment shelter will complement the surrounding rural area as far as is practicable shall be submitted to the Council for approval prior to the issue of a building licence.
Following the planning approval being granted by SAT, the applicant submitted a Schedule of Colours and Materials for Council’s consideration and approval.
Detail
On 7 July 2011, the applicant submitted a proposed Schedule of Colours and Materials to the City, for both the ‘monopole’ and ‘equipment shelter’ approved by SAT. A copy of the elevation of the approved telecommunications infrastructure detailing the proposed colours and materials has been included in Attachment 2.
The applicant proposed that the ‘equipment shelter’ be constructed of corrugated iron finished in a muted, non-reflective dark green colour titled ‘pale eucalypt’ by Colorbond; and that the ‘monopole’ have a galvanised steel finish, which would fade to a milky grey or zincalume colour.
Comment
Administration considers that a muted, non-reflective dark green colour for the ‘equipment shelter’ would integrate the facility with the surrounding natural vegetation and intensive agricultural uses of the rural area, while minimising the negative potential impacts on the visual amenity of the locality as much as is practicable.
As discussed in the previous Council report (PS08-10/10) regarding this proposal, the monopole will resemble a street light post (albeit substantially taller), similar to the street lighting that may be expected along Pinjar Road. The approved monopole structure is designed in a manner to reduce its visual impact by its relatively slim appearance. The proposal for the ‘monopole’ to have a galvanised finish that would fade to a milky grey or zincalume colour is considered suitable in minimising the visibility of the structure in the landscape, as far as practicable.
Statutory Compliance
The SAT set aside Council’s refusal and has granted planning approval pursuant to Section 29 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004. The planning approval issued by SAT requires the applicant to submit a schedule of colours and materials for Council’s approval prior to the issue of a building licence.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve the quality of the built environment”
Policy Implications
Administration has undertaken consideration of the Schedule of Colours and Materials with reference to clause 3.3 of the City of Wanneroo’s Local Planning Policy titled Mobile Telephone Base Stations. This clause states the following design criteria:-
“The external colour of towers and any antennas or dishes should blend with the background landscape.”
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES the submitted Schedule of Colours and Materials for the Telecommunications Infrastructure (monopole and equipment shelter) at Lot 39 (294) Pinjar Road, Mariginiup as received by Administration on 7 July 2011, and ADVISES the Aurecon Group and the State Administrative Tribunal that the schedule of colours and materials submitted and outlined in Attachment 2 is SATISFACTORY.
Attachments:
1. |
Attachment 1 - Council Report - Schedule of Colours and Materials |
11/84636 |
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Council Report - Schedule of Colours and Materials |
11/84638 |
Minuted |
Other Matters
PS07-08/11 Proposed Closure of 0.1 Metre Pedestrian Access Way (PAW) - Lot 6010 (30P) Denman Gardens, Landsdale
File Ref: 6039 – 11/79549
Responsible Officer: Director, Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the permanent closure of Lot 6010 (30P) Denman Gardens, Landsdale which is a 0.1 metre wide Pedestrian Access Way (PAW) abutting Lot 1620 (46) Denman Gardens, Landsdale (refer location plan - Attachment 1).
Background
This section of Denman Gardens was originally Kingsway (road), which carried high volumes of traffic. ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’, specifies that direct vehicle access to roads with volumes exceeding 5000 vehicles per day (vpd) should be avoided. The Western Australian Planning Commission restricted vehicle access to all lots fronting Kingsway as part of the subdivision approval process, however, as part of the East Wanneroo Structure Planning for Cells 5 and 6, Kingsway was later realigned and this section of Kingsway renamed to Denman Gardens. The re-alignment resulted in the traffic volumes being reduced, however, the access restrictions still remain in place, preventing the landowners from constructing a crossover or driveway to the site from this road.
The applicant has held discussions with officers from the Department of Regional Development and Lands (DRDL) and has been advised that the closure of the 0.1 metre PAW (refer Attachment 2) can be pursued by the dedication of the PAW (Lot 6010) as ‘Road’ under Section 56 of the Land Administration Act, subject to the following:
· The owner agreeing to pay the State the cost of the widening;
· The owner agreeing to pay the cost of survey, drafting and lodgement fees for the widening; and
· Council passing a resolution for the dedication of the widening pursuant to Section 56 of the Land Administration Act.
Detail
The closure of the 0.1 PAW and dedication of this land as road is considered acceptable. The existing 0.1 metre PAW is located along the Denman Gardens frontage of Lot 1620 and around the corner truncation. The traffic volumes along this section of Denman Gardens have reduced as a result of the realignment, and as such, the restriction of access is no longer required. The total length of this PAW should be closed to provide the greatest flexibility to the landowner in developing the site.
Consultation
The City referred this proposal to the relevant servicing authorities, including Western Power, Water Corporation, Telstra, Wesnet Energy, WA Gas Networks, Department of Regional Development and Lands and the Department of Planning (DoP). At the close of the thirty five day referral period no objections were received.
This proposal represents a minor closure and road dedication and as such, public consultation is not considered necessary.
Comment
It is recommended that the closure of the 0.1 metre PAW be supported and public consultation be waived for the following reasons:
· The closure only relates to Lot 1620 Denman Gardens, Landsdale;
· The vehicle volumes have significantly reduced along this road now that the Kingsway realignment has been completed; and
· The access restriction is no longer required.
· The closure of the PAW will provide greater flexibility for the future development of the land (including access), which will be considered in accordance with the Residential Design Codes of WA.
In accordance with Section 56 of the Land Administration Act, Council is required to indemnify the Minister for Lands against any claims for compensation arising from the dedication of that land currently identified as a 0.1 metre PAW.
In this regard, the dedication of the PAW land as ‘road widening’ has been requested by the landowner to facilitate the subdivision of that landholding and is not the subject of a compulsory acquisition or dedication of land at the request of the City. The applicant has advised that they are prepared to meet all costs associated with the closure of the 0.1 metre PAW and the dedication of the land for the purposes of road widening.
The DRDL has advised that it has no objection to the closure and dedication of Lot 6010 subject to the following;
· Council supporting the proposal and passing a resolution in accordance with section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997 for the dedication;
· The Department of Planning (DoP) providing its comments/approval;
· Payment of $1000.00 plus 10% GST fee for the dedication and administrative costs (payable by the owner); and
· Payment of document preparation fee of $107.00 (payable by the owner).
The City requested comments from the DoP on a number of occasions, however, no formal advice was received. Given the DRDL will not finalise the closure of the PAW and associated widening of the road without the advice of the DoP it is recommended that any decision of Council should be subject to obtaining approval from the DoP.
Statutory Compliance
The City’s consideration of the 0.1 metre PAW closure and the associated dedication of that land as ‘road widening’ has been undertaken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve the quality of the built environment”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. SUBJECT to the approval of the Department of Planning SUPPORT the permanent closure of the Pedestrian Access Way, being Lot 6010 (30P) Denman Gardens, Landsdale where it abuts Lot 1620 (46) Denman Gardens, Landsdale as depicted in Attachment 2; and
2. REQUESTS the Minister for Lands to DEDICATE as ‘Road’ that portion of the closed 0.1 metre Pedestrian Access Way (Lot 6010) depicted in Attachment 2, in accordance with Section 56 of the Land administration Act 1997 and INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands against any claim for compensation arising out of the dedication as ‘Road’ of the closed section of the Pedestrian Access Way.
Attachments:
1. |
Attachment 1 - Denman Gardens |
11/90733 |
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Denman Gardens |
11/87675 |
Minuted |
City Businesses
CB01-08/11 Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station/Emergency Coordination Centre - Upgrade of Communications Equipment
File Ref: 4693 – 11/85465
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider a successful grant application through the Natural Disaster Resilience Program 2010/2011, Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) for the upgrade of the Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station’s communication system enabling effective and accurate response to various emergencies.
Background
The recently constructed Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station reached final completion in October 2010. The facility was built with a combination of Emergency Services Levy (ESL) and Federal Government (Emergency Management Australia) grant funding. Although it was externally funded it should be noted that the Fire Station is an asset of the City of Wanneroo.
The Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade also fundraised extensively for several years to assist with the fit-out of the Fire Station, however for the Brigade to achieve greater efficiency and interoperability between agencies in its response to emergency disasters in the region, the operating systems and information/communications technologies require upgrading.
Detail
There is a need to strengthen and upgrade the existing communications network at the Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station with accurate, real-time information hence ensuring the community is better informed and equipped with a range of options and solutions in the face of emergency disasters.
Operational success in responding to emergency disasters will be measured after the emergency disaster in terms of the number of lives saved and properties protected. The effects of inadequate communication systems surrounding an emergency are paramount. This became evident in the post-analysis debriefs deriving from the 2009 Victoria bushfires. The Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission was established to investigate the causes and responses, including communications networks, to the bushfires. It should be noted that the Royal Commission’s final report contained two specific recommendations that referred to the need of efficient and improved communication technologies.
Project details of the Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station/Emergency Coordination Centre are as follows:
Project Number |
Description |
Grant Funding |
PR-2287 |
Microwave Link |
$12,000 |
PR-2287 |
NEC Xen Topaz 616 Main Equipment |
$4,896 |
PR-2287 |
Data Cabling |
$4,680 |
PR-2287 |
2 x Laptops |
$4,134 |
PR-2287 |
2 x Desktop Computers including 27” monitors |
$3,220 |
TOTAL |
|
$28,930 |
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with the Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade via the Acting Community Fire Manager/Chief Bush Fire Control Officer and the City’s Information Technology Service Unit to ensure appropriate communication equipment has been identified and the necessary quotation process carried out.
Comment
Administration believes that Project PR-2287 is of great importance to the community in providing a fully equipped facility, inclusive of an Emergency Coordination Centre, and will better meet the needs of the community. The communication equipment will greatly assist for future emergency management planning in the region and will offer benefits towards response and recovery during an emergency.
Statutory Compliance
Budget variation complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Part 2 – General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Receipt of the grant does not require the provision of additional municipal funds, however the following budget amendment is necessary to reflect the $28,930 FESA grant received by the City.
Income |
Grant Amount |
Expenditure |
Project Number |
Account Number 915240-8999-501 |
$28,930 |
Account Number 235240-9499-229 |
PR-2287 |
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) grant totalling $28,930.00;
2. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995, APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the expenditure of $28,930.00 for the upgrade of the Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Fire Station’s communication system; and
3. NOTES the following consequential budget variation to give effect to 2. Above:
EXPENDITURE
Cost Code |
From |
To |
Description |
915240-8999-501 |
$28,930.00 |
|
FESA Grant |
235240-9499-229 |
|
$28,930.00 |
PR-2287 |
Attachments: Nil
File Ref: 2323V02 – 11/87448
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider three applications for an exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animals Local Law 1999 (Amendment 2008 GG 508) stipulates:
“A person shall not keep or permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a) 2 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age; or
b) 6 dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the premises are situated on a lot having an area of 4 hectares or more,
unless the premises are licensed as an approved kennel establishment or have been granted exemption pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act and have planning approval under the town planning scheme.”
Detail
The following applications have been made under the Dog Act 1976 and are submitted for consideration:
Address of Applicants |
Description of Dogs |
63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara |
1. Male sterilised tan and white Cocker Spaniel 2. Female sterilised white Staffy cross 3. Male sterilised cream Silky Terrier cross |
147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler |
1. Male unsterilised brown Shitzu cross 2. Female unsterilised white Maltese 3. Female unsterilised white Maltese cross |
44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup |
1. Male sterilised cream Golden Retriever 2. Female sterilised tri colour Blue Heeler cross 3. Female sterilised grey Shitzu cross |
Rangers have inspected the aforementioned properties to ensure means exist on the premises at which the dogs will ordinarily be kept for effectively confining the dogs within the premises.
Address of Applicants |
Property Zonings |
Size of Properties |
Origin of Application |
63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara |
Special Rural 09 |
1.0008 hectares |
Owner generated application to comply with local laws. |
147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler |
Residential |
0.0623 hectares |
Owner generated application to comply with local laws. |
44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup |
Special Rural 08 |
2.0650 hectares |
Owner generated application to comply with local laws. |
Consultation
Where applications have been received by the City to keep more than two dogs, residents immediately adjoining the applicant’s property in question are consulted by letter to ascertain if they have any objections.
On this occasion the following objection have been received:
Address of Applicant |
Number of Objection Forms Received |
63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara |
Nil |
147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler |
Nil |
44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup |
NIl |
Application One: 63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep three dogs at 63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara. The applicant seeks approval for the three dogs having moved to the property to be with her family. A check of the City’s records reveals that prior to this application being made, no previous complaints had been lodged with Regulatory Services. Upon consultation with neighbouring properties on this application, no objections were received.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. All fences and gates are 1.3 metres in height in compliance with the required rural fence heights in Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a large sized yard and sleep in the house at night. It is recommended that an exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Two: 147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep three dogs 147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler. The applicant seeks approval for a third dog to keep her and her other two dogs company. A check of the City’s records reveals that prior to this application being made, no previous complaints had been lodged with Regulatory Services. Upon consultation with neighbouring properties on this application, no objections were received.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. All fences and gates are 1.8 metres in height in compliance with the fence heights in Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a small sized yard and sleep in the house at night. It is recommended that an exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Three: 44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep three dogs at 44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup. The applicant seeks approval for the third dog as currently there is also tenants on the property that have two registered dogs. A check of the City’s records reveals that prior to this application being made, no previous complaints had been lodged with Regulatory Services. Upon consultation with neighbouring properties on this application, no objections were received.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. All fences and gates are 1.8 metres cyclone fencing in compliance with the required rural fence heights in Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a large sized yard and sleep in the house at night. It is recommended that an exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Comment
In considering these applications for exemption, the following two options are available:
a) Council may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 subject to conditions; or
b) Council may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.
Statutory Compliance
The exemptions sought to Council’s Animals Local Law 1999 are permissible under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
“2.4.3 Develop and implement a range of activities that promote community inclusiveness, safety and well being.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. GRANTS an exemption under the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep three dogs at the following
properties;
63 Moondyne Trail, Gnangara
147 Landbeach Boulevard, Butler
44 Via Vista Drive, Mariginiup
2. ADVISES that the exemption is subject to the following specified conditions:
a) If any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no replacement is to be obtained;
b) Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum; and
c) This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints are received which are considered reasonable;
3. ADVISES the applicant and adjoining neighbours of this decision in relation to the properties.
Attachments: Nil
City Business
CB03-08/11 Tender 01121 Wet Hire of Articulated Loader for the Movement of Mulch at the Wangara Greens Recycling Centre
File Ref: 3793 – 11/84858
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No 01121 Wet Hire Articulated Loader with a minimum 3m3 bucket for the movement of mulch at the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility, 70 Motivation Drive, Wangara (weekends and Public Holidays only) for a period of one (1) year.
Background
The Wangara Greens Recycling Facility (WGRF) processed 24,631m3 of greenwaste in 2010/2011. The facility accepts greenwaste from the City of Wanneroo and the City of Joondalup bulk kerbside collection programs as well as being open on the weekends to accept greenwaste, either through free vouchers issued by the two Cities or at a charge per load at the weighbridge.
The WGRF arranges, under a separate Contract, for the granulating mulching and placement of mulch in “windrows” where the mulch matures and is made ready for sale or use by the two Cities.
Tender No 01121 requires the services of a contractor to provide the wet hire (includes driver) of an articulated loader, with a minimum 3m3 bucket, to turn the mulch in the windrows, maintain the stockpiles so they mature and safely load mulch onto customers trailers/utes as part of the weekend greenwaste program. This service operates every weekend (Saturday and Sunday) and every Public Holiday except Christmas Day, New Years Day and Good Friday.
The successful tenderer is required to have knowledge of how a greenwaste facility operates including water management, Department of Environment and Conservation licensing issues and preparing the mulch for sale. The successful Tenderer will work under the supervision of the Greens Supervisor and the Business Manager for the Wangara Recycling Centre.
Detail
Tender 01121 was advertised on 18 June 2011 and closed on 5 July 2011. Details of the tendered contract are as follows:
Contract Type |
Schedule of Rates |
Commencement Date |
24 September 2011 (proposed commencement date) |
Expiry Date |
31 August 2012 |
Extension Permitted |
Yes – two extensions of 12 months, or part thereof, with CPI applied |
Rise and Fall Included |
No |
Six (6) tenders were received for the wet hire of an articulated loader with a minimum 3m3 bucket for the movement of mulch at the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility saught to pass on increases in fuel costs above $1.30 per litre to the City of Wanneroo throughout the Tender period.
The Tender has an estimated value of over $335,000 over a three year period. An evaluation was undertaken to determine if the remaining five (5) tenders could be recommended for acceptance.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising of the Business Manager, WRC, Site Supervisor WRC and the City’s Contracts Support Officer have evaluated the Tenders in accordance with the following assessment criteria as detailed in the Tender document.
Item |
Description |
% |
1 |
Price of Works |
50 |
2 |
Previous Experience |
20 |
3 |
Resources Assigned |
20 |
4 |
Occupational Health and Safety (OSH) |
10 |
Price of Works 50%
Prices were submitted based on the following items:
· Item 1 - set hourly rate,
· Item 2 - travel to/from the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility, and
· Item 3 - other charges.
All Tenders were assessed on the overall price and were ranked as follows:
Company |
Rating Score |
Blue Tongue Profiling |
1 |
Alvito Pty Ltd |
2 |
Environmental Land Clearing |
2 |
Mayday Earthmoving |
3 |
MJ Civil |
4 |
The Tender from Blue Tongue Profiling was the lowest, whilst the Tenders from Alvito Pty Ltd and Environmental Land Clearing were of equal value, and the tender price submitted by MJ Civil was the highest of the five.
Previous Experience 20%
Company |
Rating Score |
Alvito Pty Ltd |
1 |
Environmental Land Clearing |
2 |
MJ Civil |
3 |
Blue Tongue Profiling |
3 |
Mayday Earthmoving |
3 |
Alvito Pty Ltd was the only tenderer which provided comprehensive information on its capability to undertake the prescribed work. Alvito Pty Ltd is the operator at the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility and has successfully performed the requirements of the contract for over five years. On the provision of this information, Alvito Pty Ltd was rated with the highest score.
Environmental Land Clearing Services and MJ Civil has experience in loading and transporting mulch/greenwaste but only MJ Civil had experience in managing the mulch windrows as is required by the tender.
Blue Tongue Profiling has no experience in managing mulch stockpiles nor moving mulch within a processing facility, rather its experience is in profiling roadways.
Mayday Earthmoving provided no details on its experience in managing mulch piles, or its operator’s qualifications and experience.
Resources Assigned 20%
Company |
Rating Score |
Alvito Pty Ltd |
1 |
MJ Civil |
2 |
Environmental Land Clearing |
3 |
Mayday Earthmoving |
4 |
Blue Tongue Profiling |
5 |
Alvito Pty Ltd provided details of its four (4) loaders capable of undertaking the works. It has multiple, fully trained, certified and competent operators available to undertake the works. Should one of Alvito Pty Ltd four loaders be unable to work on the weekend there is a capability to provide a replacement loader at short notice from within its own fleet.
MJ Civil has two loaders capable of undertaking the works and is able to provide extra staff (though no clarification on their qualifications) to fill the role should the main operator be unable to work.
Environmental Land Clearing Services had a loader capable of undertaking the work but would require the company hiring from a third party should its machine be unavailable.
Mayday Earthmoving was able to supply a suitable loader but did not specifically mention its manpower requirements to work every weekend and Public Holiday.
Blue Tongue Profiling had a loader capable of undertaking the work but would require the company hiring from a third party should its machine be unavailable. Blue Tongue Profiling did not specifically mention its personnel availability to work every weekend and Public Holiday.
Occupational Health and Safety (OSH) 10%
Company |
Rating Score |
Alvito Pty Ltd |
1 |
Mayday Earthmoving |
2 |
Blue Tongue Profiling |
3 |
MJ Civil |
4 |
Environmental Land Clearing |
5 |
Alvito Pty Ltd provided detailed information on its OSH management program. The Company has an OSH Committee with senior management involvement and provided complete documentation including Task Procedures and operational management systems and programs.
Mayday Earthmoving provided sufficient details on its OSH program and policies, while Blue Tongue Profiling and MJ Civil had not completed OSH documentation with their tender applications though they did provide information on how senior management were cognisant of OSH issues.
Environmental Land Clearing Services provided limited information on its OSH program and competencies.
Overall Rating
Based on the above evaluation, the overall rating of the five confirming tenders is as follows:
Company |
Rating Score |
Alvito Pty Ltd |
1 |
Blue Tongue Profiling |
2 |
Environmental Land Clearing |
3 |
MJ Civil |
4 |
Mayday Earthmoving |
5 |
Based on the above assessment, Alvito Pty Ltd is considered to be the best tenderer out of the five confirming tenders assessed. Alvito Pty Ltd has clearly demonstrated extensive previous experience, has demonstrated that they have the required resources to undertake the requirements of the contract and have in place the necessary Occupational Health and Safety processes. While the tender price submitted by Alvito Pty Ltd is not the lowest, it is the view of the Panel that the tender price is consistent with that of the current market and represents the best value for money.
On this basis, this report will recommended that the tender submitted by Alvito Pty Ltd for the Wet Hire of an Articulated Loader with Minimum 3m3 Bucket for the Movement of Mulch at the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility for a period of one (1) year be accepted.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
Tenders have been invited and evaluated against the selection criteria in accordance with Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act and associated Regulations.
The Manager Governance and Executive Services has reviewed the Tender selection process for fairness and compliance and is satisfied with the evaluation process.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve the quality of the built environment”
1.3 Improve management, recycling and re-use of waste”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost of this contract is $124,630 per annum. An allowance for this contract has been made in the Wangara Recycling Centre Operating Budget General Expenditure for 2011/2012.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS Tender 01121 from Alvito Pty Ltd as trustee for the Tony Stampalia Trust t/as Stampalia Contractors for the wet hire of an articulated loader with a minimum 3m3 bucket for the movement of mulch at the Wangara Greens Recycling Facility (weekends and Public Holidays) for a period of one year, with the option of a further two year extension or part thereof with CPI applied.
Attachments: Nil
Infrastructure
File Ref: 4428 – 11/87450
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the proposed location for the redevelopment of the existing Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club (YSLSC) facility at Yanchep Lagoon.
Background
The current YSLSC facility is located high within the dunes at the Yanchep Lagoon, with investigation in relation to a new location first considered in 2004 when the outcome of a Coastal Management Services Report commissioned at that time indicated that the preferred site would be best located at Club Capricorn, linking in with future urban development of the area. This matter was last considered by Council at its meeting of 9 February 2010, as part of the Capricorn Coastal Node Centre Structure Plan No 75 (SP 75), but the Club Capricorn location was not endorsed by Council as part of the adoption of SP 75. However, Council did recommend that a note be included on SP 75 stating that the exact location of the YSLSC still needed to be determined and integrated with the Capricorn Coastal Node at a more detailed stage of the planning process.
At a meeting held on 18 March 2010 between the YSLSC and Administration, the issues in relation to maintaining residence at the current YSLSC facility were discussed. Subsequent to this meeting Surf Life Saving Western Australia commissioned a Coastal Risk Assessment and Treatment Plan to provide a risk assessment of the Yanchep area and assist the City in reconsidering the best location for the YSLSC. The outcome of the report recommended that the YSLSC remain in its current location.
On 23 November 2010, Administration undertook an internal workshop to develop design options for the Yanchep Lagoon Redevelopment Project to reflect current thoughts/direction and address known issues that align with the Two Rocks Yanchep Foreshore Management Plan (FMP) recommendations. A development option to relocate the existing YSLSC and to combine it with a community/commercial facility to a location as near as practically possible to the beach formed by the Yanchep Lagoon was a recommendation outcome of the workshop.
The YSLSC on 9 January 2011 formally agreed in principal that the YSLSC facility remain at the Yanchep Lagoon but on a new site immediately adjacent to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach.
At a meeting held on 1 February 2011, Administration considered the issues pertaining to the proposed YSLSC facility and developed actions required to progress the project for presentation to Council. Resulting actions were;
· 18 February 2011 – Engineer Consultants were engaged to provide cost estimates for the supply of services to the proposed YSLSC/Community/Commercial Facility.
· 18 March 2011 - Technical Charrette obtained agreement in principal from Statutory Authorities, Developers and Community Group stakeholders, for the location of the YSLSC to remain at the Yanchep Lagoon on a new site immediately adjacent to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach pending further investigation.
· 9 May 2011 – Coastal Assessment Study carried out by the University of Western Australia under the direction of Professor Charitha Pattiaratchi, to assess the current and future coastal impacts upon both the existing and proposed site for the YSLSC.
· 4 July 2011 – Ethnographic and Archaeological Consultants were engaged to carry out an Aboriginal Heritage study in the Yanchep Lagoon area, with a view to obtaining Ministerial consent pursuant to Section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 through the Department of Indigenous Affairs.
· 11 July 2011 - Quantity Surveyors were engaged to provide an indicative cost estimate to the built form for the YSLSC at Yanchep Lagoon.
· 25 July 2011 – Preliminary discussions between the Department of Planning (DoP) and Administration on the coastal setback requirements for the YSLSC built form.
Detail
Concept Design Study
Previous consultation in relation to the proposed YSLSC site location was conducted in support of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Coastal Management Services final Report of September 2004 and involved participants from Community Groups, Local Developers and Councillors. Discussions took place over two separate meetings and included:
· Areas and activities that may be conducted in the future included current activities, like fishing and swim training and highlighted growing sports such as kite surfing and paragliding. The project reference groups also made mention of ancillary activities, such as skating for youth.
· Specific requirements, which included the need for a facility to be centrally based and multi purpose, be family orientated activities/areas and allow for disability access.
· Priority of activities identified swimming as the main priority for the community along with secondary activities such as, kite surfing and yachting due to resultant minimal impact on the dune areas.
· Traffic access and connections, pathways and parking that had a high level of passive surveillance. Restriction of public vehicle access onto the beach, while allowing for emergency vehicles. Providing distance-marked walking trails, aligning public transport routes and stops to current and future needs.
· Amenities, along with the need for a multipurpose built facility incorporating a social/function room, shelters and barbeques, ablutions and change rooms, cafe, storage, event lighting and power, and surf club.
· Services and safety, which includes the need for the surf club to have a visual surveillance over the beach, event lighting and power, passive surveillance, universal beach access and safety signage and information.
· Environmental issues such as the fragile coastline, restoring dune areas if the surf club is relocated, waste management and lagoon protection.
Surf Life Saving Western Australia (SLSWA) on behalf of the City commissioned a Coastal Risk Assessment and Treatment Plan in May 2010 of beaches in the Yanchep area. Of the five beaches studied it was noted that Yanchep Lagoon Beach has a permanent rip that results in increased lifesaver/lifeguard preventative/rescue actions. Due to the assumed “safe” reputation of the beach and adjacent amenities, the Yanchep Lagoon Beach is highly utilised to by locals and visitors alike.
Subsequent onsite communication between City representatives and the President of the YSLSC resulted in an “in principle” support for the YSLSC facility to remain at the Yanchep Lagoon on a new site immediately adjacent to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach. It is noted that this site is located diagonally opposite the existing Yanchep Kiosk building.
Although both the Coastal Management Services and the Coastal Risk Assessment and Treatment Plan outlined various sites for the YSLSC’s relocation, and identified the Yanchep Lagoon as the preferred location, with this direction also supported amongst various stakeholders. The outcome of the Technical Charrette also identified the Yanchep Lagoon as a preferred location for the YSLSC, noting that the facility be relocated a new site immediately adjacent to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach pending further investigation.
Proposed YSLSC Site Location.
Brazier Road is to be realigned as part of the overall Yanchep Lagoon Redevelopment Project and realises an opportunity for a new location to be considered for the existing YSLSC facility at a level better suited to the surf life saving activities undertaken. The site is located within the foreshore reserve and over the existing developed alignment of Brazier Road, between the Yanchep Lagoon Beach and the proposed alignment for the realignment of Brazier Road. The built form is to include a disabled pedestrian and emergency vehicle access ramp onto the beach.
The concept design developed has a ground floor level of 5m AHD to be utilised by the YSLSC. The built form is to be designed to allow for future development of a second and third level and is to include a disabled pedestrian and emergency vehicle access ramp onto the beach - refer Attachment 1 for preliminary details.
Proposed Validation of the YSLSC Site.
The Draft Coastal Assessment Study which is being reviewed by DoP, provides a summary of key outcomes related to beach changes at Yanchep Lagoon.
· In the long term (over the last 40 years), the beach width at Yanchep Lagoon appears to be decreasing at a rate of 0.30myr-1 (11m since 1971). However, the limestone headland at the proposed site for the new YSLSC has been stable over the past 40 years. Exposed areas of the beach (i.e. areas not fronted seaward by natural limestone structures) appear to be more prone to storm erosion. The limestone structures at Yanchep lagoon appear to provide a degree of beach and dune protection by attenuating waves and hence limiting the erosion potential.
· Installation of the Club Capricorn groyne in the early 1970’s caused rapid progradation (increase) of the beach on the Northern section of Yanchep Lagoon. The beach prograded by 50m until approximately 1990 before it reached a new equilibrium after the groyne was installed.
· The modelling conducted in the study indicated that the 100 year Annual Recurrence Interval (ARI) event resulted erosion of the dry beach with the amount of erosion proportional to the availability of sand and exposure to waves. However, the model indicated that a significant amount of the beach remained intact and that sand eroded from dry beach was deposited several metres offshore. The model predicted that the beach eroded by 3.2m inside the lagoon as a result of the 100 year ARI.
· The model was used to examine the beach response due to 0.5m and 1.0m increases in mean sea level to examine the beach profiles under climate change. The values represent the most likely scenarios in 2050 and 2100, respectively. The model predicted that, inside the lagoon, the beach eroded by less than 5.0m for both mean sea level rise scenarios of 0.5m and 1.0m respectively.
Thus, the beach response, inside the lagoon at Yanchep, as a result of mean sea level rise climate scenarios for a 100 year ARI was less than the observed due to seasonal variation at the same location.
· The results of the study indicate that the shoreline processes at Yanchep Lagoon are such that the offshore wave heights are considerably reduced at the beach resulting in relatively small changes on the beach.
Therefore, it may be concluded that both the existing and proposed locations for the YSLSC facility are suitable from a point of shoreline stability. A full copy of the Draft Coastal Assessment Study is available in the Elected Members Reading Room.
At a meeting on 25 July 2011 between the DoP and the City, the issue of the coastal setback in relation to the proposed YSLSC built form was discussed. DoP indicated that the location of the proposed development would be sited well within the coastal setback and at a distance from the Horizontal Setback Datum (HSD) that is not supported by the DoP’s Schedule One requirements.
Although DoP’s coastal setback requirements impact upon the preferred location for the YSLSC facility, it is the City’s Planning and Sustainability Directorate’s opinion that an alternative position for the YSLSC facility directly to the north east of the current proposal and fully sited on existing developed land would meet the DoP’s Schedule One requirements. In addressing this change in location it would also strengthen the case for inclusion of a commercial facility as part of the built form as there were also indications from the DoP that such an activity would not necessarily be supported. In this instance, the existing developed land referred to is the existing Brazier Road road reserve, and as a consequence of moving the preferred location to the north east, this would then also include part of the carpark located adjacent to the Yanchep Kiosk through which the realignment of Brazier Road will pass.
In order to clarify the change in location from that initially proposed and the alternative now being followed, a location plan is provided – refer Attachment 2. This plan denotes the initial site proposal as Option 1, the alternative site as Option 2 and the existing site as Option 3.
Validation as to the suitability of the alternative site location will require geotechnical investigation of the underlying limestone formation, with this investigation to ascertain the suitability of the strata for construction purposes.
Statutory Approvals
As the preferred location for the YSLSC facility is within the Bush Forever site number 397, Development Approval (DA) from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), as well as a Clearing Permit from the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) should vegetation be impacted upon, will need to be obtained.
It is proposed that application for DA from the WAPC for the design and construction of the new YSLSC facility will be actioned in two separate stages as follows:
DA for Geotechnical Site Investigation.
DA in two parts;
(a) Retaining Wall and Built Form Foundation, and;
(b) Built Form Structure to three levels, including disabled pedestrian and emergency vehicle access ramps to Yanchep Lagoon Beach.
A two stage approach is proposed as the results of the geotechnical investigation undertaken may prove that the foundation strata is unsuitable for the requirements of the built form. If this should be the case then the site will be rehabilitated and no further development proposed. A further report to Council as to an alternative site for the YSLSC would then be prepared.
Furthermore, the application for DA for the YSLSC would also require the amendment of the FMP as the DoP have commented in earlier correspondence that ...“in the event the City submits a formal development application to the WAPC for determination, the City is advised to amend the Management Plan to delete Action 32 and replace it with the proposed development of the Surf Life Saving Club”. The amendment to the FMP would be required to be submitted to the WAPC, together with the DA for the YSLSC facility and associated community and commercial occupancies.
Along with the DA for the Geotechnical Site Investigation, Administration would also need to confirm the impact on existing vegetation of the overall built form proposed and seek the Department of Environment and Conservation’s (DEC) approval for a Native Vegetation Clearing Permit. If the outcome of the geotechnical investigation proves to be unsuccessful, then the area cleared to accommodate the investigations will be rehabilitated in accordance with the Clearing Permit conditions of approval.
Crown Land
The Management Order for Reserve 12439 does not currently contain the power to lease the property so State Land Services (SLS) will have to be approached in this regard and there may be a requirement for the land to be excised and identified as a new l ot, or possibly as a new Reserve. Should a Reserve be required then this will have require a management order to be developed that reflects all of the uses proposed as part of the YSLSC facility as well as containing the power to lease.
Yanchep Kiosk
The existing Yanchep Kiosk is sited on land leased by the City from State Government and it has been subleased to operators of the Kiosk. The current agreement between the City and the current sub-lessee is valid until September 2016, with the Sub-lessee paying market rent plus outgoings.
The City is endeavouring to schedule both Brazier Road realignment works and construction of the YSLSC facility along with associated road closures to minimise wherever possible the impact on the Kiosk and its business. There may be interruptions to the business during the construction of the Brazier Road realignment works.
Consultation
Public consultation will be undertaken as per the requirements of the City’s Community Consultation Process.
Preparations are underway to develop a comprehensive consultation strategy for the proposed redevelopment of public facilities at Yanchep Lagoon once key milestones are confirmed in relation to planning approvals and related engineering matters associated with the YSLSC facility and the realignment of Brazier Road. The period of consultation will include an onsite event at Picnic Cove, engagement through local schools, clubs and organisations, as well as community media, the City’s website and a postal drop of the area.
Comment
The YSLSC facility is to be based upon similar principals as the Quinns Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club, whereby future development of the YSLSC is to maximise the usage of the natural setting and construction infrastructure such that the ultimate development provides a facility that caters to and enhances people’s social capacity within the local community.
To optimise the development and usage of the site, the YSLSC facility is proposed to be designed to allow for three levels, with the ground floor level accommodating the YSLSC. The remaining two floors, as part of future development, would provide opportunities for community facilities and a commercial venture.
Due to restrictions pertaining to the coastal setback requirements, it is proposed to investigate alternative site locations that would provide a opportunity to obtain DA from the WAPC that would likely to be supported.
For and against consideration for the various proposed location options available for the YSLSC facility site is summarised as follows:
OPTIONS |
ISSUES |
FOR |
AGAINST |
1. Location within the foreshore vegetated area at Yanchep Lagoon. |
Provides for; · Requirements of the YSLSC; · Disabled access to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach; · Direct links to Picnic Cove, adjoining carpark and Brazier Road, and; · Community facilities. |
Good beach access for YSLSC and has agreement in principal by YSLSC for position. Conforms to the Risk Management Study undertaken by Surf Life Saving WA. |
WAPC approval would not be expected. Resistance to the proposal by DoP as it is viewed as being outside the requirements of WAPC Schedule One and commercial use would not be supported. |
2. Location within the existing developed area of Yanchep Lagoon. |
Provides for; · Requirements of the YSLSC; · Disabled access to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach; · Direct links to Picnic Cove, adjoining carpark and Brazier Road, and; · Community and commercial facilities. |
WAPC approval is likely as it remains within the existing development of Yanchep Lagoon. Conforms to the Risk Management Study undertaken by Surf Life Saving WA. |
Reduction of available area for Picnic Cove development. Reduced beach access for the YSLSC. |
3. Location at the existing YSLSC site. |
Provides for; · Requirements of the YSLSC, and; · Community and commercial facilities. |
WAPC approval is likely as it remains within the existing development of Yanchep Lagoon. Conforms to the Risk Management Study undertaken by Surf Life Saving WA.
|
Requires extensive earthworks within the dune area to provide suitable beach access for the YSLSC. Will require temporary accommodation for YSLSC while the facility is redeveloped. |
4. Other location outside the Yanchep Lagoon area (may include the site identified in 2004 report). |
Still to be assessed. |
Still to be assessed. |
Does not conform to the Risk Management Study undertaken by Surf Life Saving WA. |
Option 2 is considered by Administration to be most favourable option at this time pending support from the WAPC by way of issue of a Development Approval to undertake geotechnical investigations and the subsequent outcomes arising from these investigations.
Statutory Compliance
Before proceeding with detailed design/construction for the YSLSC/Community/Commercial Facility, the City will need to follow the following sequential approval process:
· Endorsement by Council;
· Public consultation;
· DA submission to the Local Authority;
· Section 18 Clearance from the DIA
· Obtain management order from SLS;
· DA submission to the WAPC; and
· Clearing and “Offset” planting requirement submission to Department of Environment and Conservation.
· Report outcomes of DA and Clearing applications to Council and seek endorsement to commence detailed design and seeks tenders for construction.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“1 Environment
1.4 Improve the quality of the built environment”
Social
1.1 - Increase choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options
2.2 – Improve the City’s identity and community well being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation
2.3 – Improve the capacity for local communities to support each other”.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The design and construction of the YSLSC facility is proposed to accommodate for the future development, whereby the building foundation is to be designed to accommodate a total of three (3) levels, with the ground floor (ie: first level) to accommodated the YSLSC. Future development to include community and commercial facilities on the remaining two floors (ie: second and third levels could incorporate a combination of public and private venture funding.
Funding allocated as part of the City’s 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget and subsequent funding proposed in the 10-year Capital Works Program for the YSLSC facility provides for costs associated with the planning, design and construction of
· Retaining wall and foundation (for three levels), and;
· The ground floor to accommodate the YSLSC and including a disabled pedestrian and emergency vehicle access ramp to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach.
Current order of cost estimates for the various components of the project along with financial year budget allocations are summarised in the following table. It is noted that given the order of cost estimates have been determined on a preliminary design basis, a contingency allowance of 15% in addition to the overall order of cost estimate total has been included in determining the total funding required.
Yanchep Lagoon Surf Life Saving Club (PR-1048) |
||
Project Component Descriptor |
Order of Cost Estimate |
Current Budget Allocation |
Project PR-1048 Funding 2010/2011, with unexpended funding carried forward to 2011/2012 |
$500,000 |
|
Project PR-1048 Funding 2012/2013 |
$1,500,000 |
|
Project PR-1048 Funding 2013/2014 |
$1,500,000 |
|
Project PR-1048 Funding 2014/2015 |
$895,750 |
|
Project Management (City of Wanneroo) |
$120,000 |
|
Design Consultation Fees including allowance for Geotechnical Investigation |
$250,000 |
|
Power Supply (Consultant’s Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$423,000 |
|
Water & Sewer (Consultant’s Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$222,000 |
|
Foundation and Retaining Wall Construction (Consultant’s Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$1,726,000 |
|
Ground Level Building
Construction including Emergency Vehicle and Disabled Pedestrian Ramp access
to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach |
$2,450,500 |
|
Total Order of Cost Estimates |
$5,191,500 |
|
plus allowance for Contingency @ 15% |
$778,725 |
|
Total Funding Required |
$5,970,225 |
|
Total Funding Allocated |
|
$4,395,750 |
Forecast Additional Funding |
|
$1,574,475 |
A forecast additional funding requirement for the planning, design and construction of the YSLSC facility to first level stage, ie., ground floor construction only, inclusive of access to the Yanchep Lagoon Beach in the order of $1,574,475 is noted, with allowance to be made in the City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program.
It is noted that the current budget allocation for the project in the City’s 10 year Capital Works Program is made up primarily of municipal funding, with $500,000 noted as being contributed through the proposed Northern Coastal Growth Corridor Developer Contributions Scheme in the area and a further $250,000 to be sought from Lottery West as part of the $1.5M in funding allocation in 2012/2013.
A further report will address the impact on project costs and associated funding subject to the outcomes arising from the geotechnical investigation work undertaken.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the proposed location for the new Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club facility within the existing developed area of Yanchep Lagoon in accordance with the site location denoted as Option 2 on Attachment 2 to this report;
2. ENDORSES Administration to proceed with an application for Development Approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission to undertake geotechnical investigation of the endorsed site per Item 1; and
3. NOTES that Administration will present a further report to Council on the outcomes of the Development Application from the Western Australian Planning Commission to undertake geotechnical investigation of the endorsed site per Item 1, with this report to address the impact on project costs and associated funding subject to the outcomes arising for the geotechnical investigation work.
Attachments:
1. |
YSLSC/Community/Commercial Facility |
11/87390 |
|
2. |
Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club Site Location Options |
11/89269 |
Minuted |
Traffic Management
File Ref: 5597 – 11/75211
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider implementing new parking prohibitions on Brookway Retreat and Sedgley Close, Landsdale, and revising the parking prohibitions on Southmead Drive, The Broadview and Warradale Terrace in the vicinity of the Landsdale Primary School.
Background
Council received Petition PT02-10/10 at its meeting of 19 October 2010. The petition reads:
“We the residents of Landsdale who live near the Landsdale Primary School have signed a petition to express our concern and discontent at the parking, student’s parents and care givers undertake around our streets nearby the school.
Our lawns and sprinklers are being broken and dug up and even at times we cannot even get out of our own driveways. The concern is too, that a child might get knocked down as the congestion and at times appalling driving up curbs, footpaths and even into our gardens is becoming unsafe and reckless.
Please can you consider more no parking signs or another pick-up solution before there is a tragedy. The residents have to foot the bill for sprinklers and sand to maintain our areas unless council can consider pick up the tab.
Please let us know what you imply to do about this situation as soon as you can”.
The petition has been signed by 12 residents representing seven residential properties fronting Brookway Retreat; two from Sedgley Close and one from Southmead Drive.
In addition to the petition, the City has been approached by the Landsdale Primary School Roadwise Committee to undertake a revision of the existing parking signage around the school. Administration has undertaken to address both matters in this report.
Detail
The Landsdale Primary School is bounded by Southmead Drive, The Broadview, Warradale Terrace, and Warradale Park. Parking bays are available along the three road frontages and within the park, however, their capacity is insufficient to cope with the peak morning and afternoon parking demand.
The residents of Brookway Retreat and Sedgley Close have expressed concern that the parents of students at the nearby Landsdale Primary School are parking on both sides of Brookway Retreat and Sedgley Close restricting access to/from their properties and parking on their verges damaging their lawns, gardens and reticulation.
Brookway Retreat is located opposite the Southmead Drive frontage of the school. It functions as a local access road with 11 residential property frontages between Southmead Drive and Ashville Parade, while Sedgley Close is a local access place with 19 residential property frontages.
A footpath is located along the northern side of Brookway Retreat between Southmead Drive and Sedgley Close and on the southern side between Sedgley Close and Ashville Parade. There is no footpath on Sedgely Close.
In addition, the Landsdale Primary School Roadwise Committee has requested that the existing parking prohibitions and Kiss & Drive facility bordering the school be revised.
A location plan showing the area of interest can be found at Attachment 1.
Consultation
To ascertain the opinion of affected residents towards the proposed parking prohibitions a survey commenced on the 10 March 2011, with the specified final reply date of Friday, 25 March 2011. The survey covered owners and occupiers of Brookway Retreat between Southmead Drive and Ashville Parade, and the owners and occupiers of Sedgley Close. Refer to Attachment 2, Drawing No 2670-2-0 for original parking prohibitions proposal.
For Brookway Retreat 12 responses representing 11 of the 16 residences were received, with nine being in favour of the proposed parking prohibitions and three opposed. For Sedgley Close 12 responses representing 11 of the 18 residences were received, with eight being in favour of the proposed parking prohibitions and four opposed. One resident of Sedgley Close who opposed the proposal, acknowledged that parents were parking on the verge but did not object. The other three gave no reason for their opposition. The response rate of 70% is considered very good.
The comments from residents who opposed the proposal are as follows:
4 Sedgley Close Please do not include our nature strip. We often have 3 cars parked on our property and there is nowhere else to park that would not cause inconvenience. |
Proposed parking prohibitions have been adjusted to remove verge coverage of this address. |
5 Sedgley Close I want to park my car and my family and visitors to park on my nature strip but nobody else. |
Proposed parking prohibitions have been adjusted to remove coverage of this address. Nature strip protection can be provided by Clause 58(2) of the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law “A person not being the occupier of the land abutting on to a nature strip, shall not, without the consent of that occupier, drive, park or stop a vehicle upon that nature strip.” |
7 Sedgley Close I think for the short time this is an inconvenience people have no choice to park on the streets. I have lived here for 8 years and I don’t care. It’s more important people are trying to get there children to school, they have little choice of parking. |
Proposed parking prohibitions have been adjusted to remove coverage of this address. |
14 Sedgley Close Where else will they be able to park. Send letter to school for all parents to advise not to park on corners or be fined. |
Proposed parking prohibitions do not directly impact on this residence. |
16 Sedgley Close Need to look for a more viable, positive solution for school traffic and parking, more rules and regulations won’t help anyone. |
Proposed parking prohibitions do not directly impact on this residence. |
An additional parking area at the Community Centre, off Warradale Terrace, would provide more legitimate parking, not only for parents on school days but also for weekend sporting matches and any other community events at the centre. |
Administration will examine the possibility of shared funding of additional parking bays at this location with the Department of Education. |
15 Brookway Retreat Very unfair to prohibit parking on Brookway Retreat. This will cause problems due to insufficient parking around school – Parents & students don’t need this stress especially in bad weather. School parking is essential for the periods 8.30am-9.00am and 2.30pm-3.30pm. There is insufficient parking around the school to cater for a large school (700+ students). Very unfair to parents & students!! |
Comments have been noted by Administration. |
Additionally, two supporters of the parking prohibitions have suggested that additional parking should be created at the Landsdale Community Centre in Warradale Park on the northern boundary of the school. It was also suggested that a road from Warradale Terrace to Southmead Drive, with drop-off/pick-up facilities, be created along the northern boundary of the school, separating it from Warradale Park.
Discussions were also undertaken with the Principal of Landsdale Primary School concerning the parking situation around the school. The school position is that as many parking positions as possible be maintained and the parking prohibitions be limited.
Comment
On assessment of the petition, survey results and comments from the City’s Parking Compliance Officers, Administration considers the implementation of parking prohibitions along Brookway Retreat and Sedgley Close is necessary to reduce the risk to primary school children caused by inappropriate parking and to reduce the impact on residents.
The basic philosophy of the original proposal was to ban parking on residents’ nature strips during the designated school peak drop-off and pick-up times, and to allow kerb side parking on only one side of the road during the same times. The preferred side of the road for allowed parking was the side with a footpath.
Based on the survey responses, the proposed parking prohibitions have been modified. The scope along Sedgley Close has been reduced to exclude the properties of those not in favour of the proposal. For Brookway Retreat the majority of supporters for parking prohibitions are on the south side where the footpath is located. However, Administration supports the prohibition of parking along the northern side of the road to reduce traffic congestion and maintain manoeuvrability but believes that kerbside parking along the southern side should still be allowed. The revised parking prohibition proposal is shown in City of Wanneroo Drawing No 2711-2-0 and 2711-3-0 (Attachments 3 refers).
To ensure that all parking signs are in accord with the terminology used in the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law and the Road Traffic Code, Administration also proposes the following changes to parking signage around the Landsdale Primary School:
· All signs using the phrase ‘VERGE’ are to be replaced by signs using the phrase ‘NATURE STRIP’;
· All signs using the phrase ‘MON-FRI’ are to be replaced by signs using the phrase ‘SCHOOL DAYS’;
· All ‘NO STOPPING’ signs on intersections corners are to be upgraded to ‘NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP’ and reinforced with ‘NO STOPPING’ Yellow linemarking;
· The Kiss & Drive signage is to be upgraded to ‘5MIN PARKING’ rather than the undefined phrase ‘DROP-OFF & PICK-UP ONLY’;
· Parking on the Southmead Drive nature strip, opposite Cantrell Circuit, is to be permanently prohibited rather than only during school peak times.
Administration also believes the following footpaths should be constructed to support the parking proposals and lessen the need for students to cross Brookdale Retreat or walk on the road along Sedgley Close:
· Brookway Retreat, south side between Southmead Drive and Sedgley Close
· Sedgley Close, east side between Brookway Retreat and the cul-de-sac elbow.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of prohibition signage will allow the enforcement of Clause 38 and 39 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003 (as amended):
38 (1) A person shall not stop or park a vehicle on a road or reserve unless the vehicle is stopped or parking in accordance with this Local Law.
(2) A vehicle is not stopped or parked in accordance with this Local Law if:
(a) it is stopped or parked in any place to which a “no stopping” sign applies.
(b) it is stopped or parked in any place to which a “no parking” sign applies;
(c) it is stopped or parked in contravention of any provision of this Local Law;
(d) it is stopped or parked in contravention of any sign; or
(e) it is stopped or parked on a carriageway with yellow edge lines.
39 (1) Subject to subclauses (2), (3), (4) and (5), a person shall not park a vehicle in a parking stall in a road otherwise than –
(a) parallel to and as close to the kerb as is practicable;
(b) wholly within the stall; and
For those properties not included in the parking prohibition plan, nature strip protection can be provided by Clause 58 (2) of the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law:
58 (2) A person not being the occupier of the land abutting on to a nature strip, shall not, without the consent of that occupier, drive, park or stop a vehicle upon that nature strip.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The provision of parking prohibitions incurs not only the initial cost of materials and installation of the signs but also the ongoing cost of maintenance due to vandalism and graffiti. The estimated cost of materials and labour to implement these parking prohibitions is $3,000, which can be funded from the Project No PR –1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking, Various, for which a total of $10,000 has been approved in the 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget.
The enforcement of parking prohibitions over an increasing number of sites will also impact on the resource availability of the City’s Parking Compliance Officers to enforce all prohibitions throughout the City.
The estimated cost to construct the proposed footpaths is $10,000 for Brookdale Retreat, and $12,000 for Sedgley Close.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs along the north side of Brookway Retreat, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
2. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs along the south side of Brookway Retreat, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
3. APPROVES the removal of the “NO STOPPING” (R5-36) sign on the southern side of Brookway Retreat at the intersection of Southmead Drive, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
4. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) signs along the south side of Brookway Retreat, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
5. APPROVES the installation of parking stalls along both sides of Brookway Retreat, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
6. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs along the west side of Sedgley Close, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
7. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs along the east side of Sedgley Close, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
8. APPROVES the installation of parking stalls along the east side of Sedgley Close, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
9. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) signs on the northeast and northwest corners the of Brookway Retreat / Sedgely Close intersection, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
10. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs on the east side of Southmead Drive, opposite Cantrell Circuit, with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) signs as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
11. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR VERGE, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs on the west side of Southmead Drive between Cantrell Circuit and Brookway Retreat with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
12. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR VERGE” (R5-36) signs on the east side of Southmead Drive, opposite Brookway Retreat, with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) signs as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
13. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING” (R5-36) signs with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) on:
a) the northwest corner of the Brookway Retreat / Southmead Drive intersection signs as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
b) the northeast and southeast corner, and western side, of the The Broadview / Southmead Drive intersection, as shown on Drawing 2711-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
14. APPROVES the installation of Yellow “NO STOPPING” lines along the kerbline at the intersection of:
a) Brookway Retreat and Sedgley Close, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
b) Brookway Retreat and Southmead Drive, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
c) Cantrell Circuit and Southmead Drive, as shown on Drawing 2711-2-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
d) Southmead Drive and The Broadview, as shown on Drawing 2711-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
15. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR VERGE, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, MON - FRI” and “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR VERGE, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) signs on south side of The Broadview with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R35) signs as shown on Drawing 2711-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
16. APPROVES the replacement of “NO PARKING, PICK UP & SET DOWN ONLY, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-13) signs at the “Kiss & Drive” embayment on north side of The Broadview with “NO PARKING 5 MINUTE, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-13) signs, as shown on Drawing 2711-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
17. APPROVES the replacement of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR VERGE” (R5-36) sign on west side of Warradale Terrace with “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) signs, as shown on Drawing 2711-3-0 (Attachment 3 refers);
18. LISTS an amount of $10,000 for consideration in the draft 10 Year Capital Works Program for the construction of 70m of footpath in Brookway Retreat in the City’s 10-Year Strategic Financial Management Plan 2012/13 – 2021/22;
19. LIST an amount of $12,000 for consideration in the draft 10 Year Capital Works Program for the construction of 90m of footpath in Sedgley Close;
20. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision; and
21. ADVISES the Principal of Landsdale Primary School of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
1. |
Landsdale Primary School - Parking Prohibitions - Locality Map |
11/83704 |
|
2. |
Landsdale Primary School - Parking Prohibitions Drawing 2670-2-0 |
11/87755 |
|
3. |
Landsdale Primary School - Parking Prohibitions Drawings 2711-2-0 & 2711-3-0 |
11/91666 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 233
File Ref: 5597 – 11/82935
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the provision of parking prohibitions on Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive, Merriwa, opposite the Merriwa Primary School.
Background
At its meeting on 21 September 2010, Council considered a Motion on Notice with regard to parking on Baltimore Parade, Merriwa, in the vicinity of Merriwa Primary School and resolved as follows:
That Council REQUESTS Administration to fully investigate the parking issues being experienced in Baltimore Parade and provide a detailed report to Council on strategies to improve the orderly flow of traffic and vehicle parking subject to the school establishing a Roadwise Committee.
It is reported that parents of students of Merriwa Primary School are parking on the nature strip of residences opposite the school on Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive, and in some instances across their crossovers.
In 2009 the school approached the City seeking assistance in alleviating the parking problems around the school and requested the installation of a Kiss & Drive facility. This was considered by Council at its meeting of 17 November 2009 and resulted in the following resolution (Item No IN06-11/09 refers):
“1. APPROVES the construction of an embayment and installation of “5 Min Parking, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-13) and “KISS and DRIVE” signs on the southern side of Greyhound Drive, adjacent to Merriwa Primary School, as shown on Drawing 2502-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. APPROVES the construction of a shared path connecting the Addison Park carpark (accessed of Baltimore Parade) to the existing path on Baltimore Parade as shown on Drawing 2502-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
3. NOTES that the estimated cost of $30,000 for the construction of the embayment and the shared pathway is to be funded from Project No PR – 1948 – Miscellaneous Traffic Management.”
It is noted that the pathway connection and embayment with associated signage were completed as part of the capital works program.
Detail
The Merriwa Primary School has a current student population of 667 and also contains an Education Support Centre and Dental Therapy Centre catering for students of the school and surrounding suburbs. A location map showing the subject area is provided as Attachment 1.
Parking demand around the school is catered for by 44 on-street parking bays available along the three frontages of the school, 9 on Baltimore Parade, 12 on Greyhound Drive and 23 on Addison Gardens. Additionally, two car parks are available in Addison Park, which forms the fourth boundary of the school, providing an additional 81 parking bays.
The recently constructed ‘Kiss & Drive’ facility is located on Greyhound Drive and a bus embayment is located on Baltimore Parade, which serves the Transperth service and the school’s special needs bus.
Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive are Local Distributor Roads in the City’s Functional Road Hierarchy, while Addison Gardens is a Local Access Road.
During a site visit it was observed that the majority of the embayed parking spaces on Addison Gardens, were unused. It is apparent that parents prefer to park near the main gates of the school on Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive, on the nature strip on the eastern side of Baltimore Parade and the northern side of Greyhound Drive. This has resulted in residents’ complaints that parents are parking across crossovers, blocking access to/from properties, or parking so close that it obstructs the sight distance for exiting vehicle. Currently, these properties receive some protection through the following general clauses of the City’s Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law:
57 The driver of a vehicle (other than a bicycle or an animal) shall not stop the vehicle so that any portion of the vehicle is on a path, traffic island, painted island, flush island or median strip, unless the vehicle is stopped in an area, to which a parking control sign applies and a vehicle is permitted to stop at that place under these Local Laws.
58 (2) A person not being the occupier of the land abutting on to a nature strip, shall not, without the consent of that occupier, drive, park or stop a vehicle upon that nature strip.
59 (2) A person shall not stop a vehicle on or across a driveway or other way of access for vehicles travelling to or from adjacent land, unless –
(a) the person is dropping off, or picking up, passengers and stops for no longer than 2 minutes;
68 (1) A person who parks a vehicle on a carriageway (except in a median strip parking area) shall position the vehicle in accordance with subclauses (2) to (8), [subject to the exception in subclauses (9) and (10)].
(6) If the carriageway has a continuous dividing line or a median strip, the vehicle shall be positioned at least 3 metres from any continuous line or median strip, unless otherwise indicated by information on or with a parking control sign.
The City’s Parking Compliance Officers have attended the school in response to complaints and also on routine school parking duties. As a result of this enforcement, six parking infringements have been issued over the last 12 months.
The school is located on the northeast corner of a block that also contains Addison Park and is bounded by Greyhound Drive, Baltimore Parade, Addison Gardens and Palermo Court, however, the size of the property discourages circulation of traffic required for the proper use of the Kiss and Drive facility.
While analysing the traffic circulation issue an assessment was also made of the need for traffic management along Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive. The assessment was made in accord with the City’s Traffic Management Investigation and Intervention Policy (TMIIP) which considers a range of criteria including:
1. Speed
2. Traffic volume
3. Crash history
4. Road design and topography
5. Vulnerable road users – pedestrian/cyclists
Traffic surveys were conducted at a number of sites and results are listed below.
Location |
AWT |
85%ile |
TMIIP |
Greyhound Drive – Marmion Ave to Baltimore Pde |
7035 |
55 |
72 |
Baltimore Parade – Jenolan Way to Greyhound Dr |
4515 |
61 |
42 |
The TMIIP requires an area to be 90% developed and occupied with a score of >60 to qualify for traffic management treatments, while scores between 30 and 60 points indicate a need for increased attention to law enforcement and driver education.
For Greyhound Drive the TMIIP score is 72 points which indicates that the installation of traffic management treatments is justified. While for Baltimore Parade, adjacent to the school, the score was 42 points. However, the need for traffic treatments along Baltimore Parade was previously considered by Council at its meeting of 8 February 2011 during debate on a report (Item No IN07-02/11 refers) into a fatal accident at the corner of Baltimore Parade and Jenolan Way and resulted in endorsement of the construction of roundabouts at the Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way and Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive intersections.
The following is an extract from Council Minutes for Item No IN07-02/11:
“That Council:-
2. ENDORSES the following Administration comments to the Crash Location Report findings and recommendations:
PA1 Median Island (LM22)
Agree.
The City will apply to Main Roads WA for the installation of KEEP LEFT signs on the median islands at the Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way intersection. The City will also request the installation of median continuity lines through the intersection as shown in Main Roads WA drawing 200331-134-4.
In the longer term construct a roundabout at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Jenolan Way. This will more strongly define the correct alignment required to negotiate the intersection.
NFN51 Operational Speed (LM58)
Agree.
An assessment of Baltimore Parade in accord with the City’s Traffic Management Investigation and Intervention Policy has been undertaken which supports the need for traffic management treatments between Hester Avenue and Jenolan Way.
Construct roundabouts at the Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way and Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive intersections. Roundabout designs to include predeflection on approaches to reduce overall speed through the intersections.
3. LISTS $180,000 for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Jenolan Way, Merriwa, in the City’s 10-Year Strategic Financial Management Plan 2011/12 – 2020/21;
4. LISTS $180,000 for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive, Merriwa, in the City’s 10-Year Strategic Financial Management Plan 2011/12 – 2020/21;
5. NOTES that these two roundabout proposals will be assessed for possible funding from the 2012/2013 Black Spot Program;”
Consultation
To ascertain the opinion of affected residents towards the proposed parking prohibitions a survey was undertaken commencing on the 11 March 2011 with the specified final reply date of Friday, 25 March 2011. The survey covered owners and occupiers of Baltimore Parade between Jenolan Way and Eldon Close, and the owners and occupiers of Greyhound Drive between Baltimore Parade and Addison Gardens. The proposed parking prohibitions are shown in City Drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
For Baltimore Parade six responses representing five of the nine properties were received, with five being in favour of the proposed parking prohibitions and one opposed. For Greyhound Drive five responses representing four of the seven residences were received, with all being in favour of the proposed parking prohibitions. The response rate of 60% is considered above average.
Resident comments on the parking proposal are as follows:
56 Baltimore Parade - Cnr Baltimore Pde & Jenolan Way We want to continue the current practice of parking on the native strip at all times at our property. Please do not remove our nature strip parking. |
The proposed parking prohibitions do not change the existing parking prohibitions covering this property. |
70 Baltimore Parade Perhaps a “Drive Through” facility could be incorporated (As per St Anthonys - Wanneroo) whereby cars dropping off children would enter the school’s car park from Baltimore Pde, and exit into Greyhound Drive. |
Development of parking facilities within the school grounds is an issue for the State Department of Education |
31 Greyhound Drive Council should look at extending parking provisions either in adjacent bushland or park area. This is required in this growing school so that people do not park illegally or unsafely just because they want to get their children to school. |
Not all available parking on Addison Gardens is in use. The school needs to work with parents to better utilise the available parking resource. |
33 Greyhound Drive I also feel speed ramps are required for Greyhound Drive as people speed down this road to get to Marmion. |
Administration agrees that traffic management treatments are warranted along Greyhound Drive. |
Ranger and Safety Services have been consulted regarding the proposed parking prohibitions and the impact on staff resources to enforce compliance.
Comment
On assessment of the survey results and comments from the City’s Parking Compliance Officers, Administration considers the implementation of parking prohibitions along Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive is necessary to reduce the risk to primary school children by inappropriate parking and to reduce the impact on residents.
For Baltimore Parade, parking on the road can be prohibited by the Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law general Clause 68, similarly parking on the footpath is prohibited by Clause 57, while parking on the nature strip is controlled by Clause 58 and parking in driveways by Clause 59.
It should be noted that Clause 59 does allow drivers to stop on or across crossovers for up to two minutes to drop-off or pick-up passengers. Also, the Parking Compliance Officers find Clause 58 difficult to enforce as they are unable to identify compliant from non-compliant vehicles unless owners complain, and often by the time complaints are actioned the offending driver has left.
Administration recommends that a yellow ‘No Stopping’ line be installed along the kerb line of Baltimore Parade to reinforce Clause 68 and that timed ‘No Stopping’ be implemented to apply to the verge.
For Greyhound Drive, Clause 68 does not apply as the road does not have a median limiting the traffic lane width. Administration recommends that timed ‘No Stopping’ be implemented to apply to both the road and verge.
The proposed additions to the parking prohibitions for Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive are as shown in Drawing No 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
It should be noted that there are more than 40 schools in the City and daily attention is not possible for all schools at peak times. While the City’s Parking Compliance Officers attempt to routinely attend all schools their efforts are influenced by the level of complaints received that assist in directing resources accordingly.
While the City encourages schools to establish Roadwise Committees to educate parents to safe driving practices around schools and reduce parking demand, up until now Administration has not been resourced to provide assistance to these committees. It is noted that Council has now approved the creation of a position for a Road Safety and TravelSmart Officer and it is intended that this officer, when appointed, will work with schools to better promote road safety wise objectives.
In regard to the resolutions requirement for Administration to develop “strategies to improve the orderly flow of traffic” around the school, Administration recommends the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Greyhound Drive and Addison Gardens. This roundabout will work in concert with those already endorsed by Council for the intersections of Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive and Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way (Item No IN07-02/11 refers) to assist in the better functioning of the Kiss & Drive facility on Greyhound Drive and better define the school precinct. It is also recommended that Administration further engage with the community to develop a comprehensive traffic management scheme for Greyhound Drive.
Statutory Compliance
The installation of parking prohibition signage will allow the enforcement of Part 4 Clause 38 of the City’s Parking and Facilities Local Law 2003 (as amended).
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
The proposal to install parking prohibitions on nature strip near the school on Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive is consistent with the following City of Wanneroo Strategic Plan 2006-2021 outcome Objectives:
“Social
2.4 Improved community safety”
2.4.1 Implement a range of road safety initiatives to improve the standard of the road network and user behaviour.
Financial Implications
The provision of parking prohibitions includes the initial cost of materials and installation of the signs, as well as the ongoing cost of maintenance due to vandalism and graffiti. The estimated cost of materials and labour to implement these parking prohibitions is $1,500, which can be funded from the Project No PR –1431, Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking, Various, for which a total of $10,000 has been approved in the 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget.
The estimated cost of constructing a roundabout at the intersection of Greyhound Drive and Addison Gardens is $180,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) on the eastern side of Baltimore Parade as shown on drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) on the eastern side of Baltimore Parade as shown on drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
3. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, NATURE STRIP” (R5-36) on the northwest corner of the intersection of Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive as shown on drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
4. APPROVES the installation of “NO STOPPING, ROAD OR NATURE STRIP, 7.30-9AM, 2.30-4PM, SCHOOL DAYS” (R5-36) on the northern side of Greyhound Drive as shown on drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
5. APPROVES the installation of Yellow “NO STOPPING” line marking along the kerb line on Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive as shown on drawing 2674-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
6. APPROVES the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Greyhound Drive and Addison Gardens, Merriwa;
7. LISTS an amount of $180,000 for consideration in the draft 10 year Capital Works Program for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Greyhound Drive and Addison Gardens, Merriwa;
8. ADVISES the residents of Baltimore Parade and Greyhound Drive in the vicinity of Merriwa Primary School of Council’s decision; and
9. ADVISES the Principal of Merriwa Primary School of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
1. |
Merriwa Primary School - Traffic and Parking Issues - Locality Map |
11/83653 |
|
2. |
Merriwa Primary School - Traffic and Parking Issues - Proposed Parking Prohibitions 2674-1-0 |
11/91658 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 242
File Ref: 5546 – 11/83760
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 8
Issue
To consider projects to be submitted for funding consideration in the 2012/2013 State and Federal Nation Building Black Spot Programs.
Background
The State and Federal Governments have both committed to reductions in casualty crashes on Australian roads through Black Spot programs. These programs are primarily reactive and target road locations where crashes have occurred, although some allowance is made for proactive applications supported by a formal Road Safety Audit (RSA).
Main Roads WA (MRWA) issued invitations for submissions to the 2012/2013 State and Federal Nation Building Black Spot Programs in February 2011, with the closing date of 15 July 2011. All submissions will be evaluated by MRWA against criteria set out in the Black Spot Program Development and Management Guidelines. To assist with the preparation of submissions, MRWA provided crash data for the five-year period 2006 to 2010, a list of qualifying sites and Crash Benefit Cost Analysis Software.
Black Spot projects based on crash data must meet a minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) to ensure the proposed remedial works are cost effective. The BCR is the value of the benefit to the community of the expected reduction in accidents versus the cost of the proposed remedial treatment.
The State Black Spot Program is based on all recorded crashes, fatalities, casualties and property damage. The criteria for the program are as follows:
· For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is five crashes over a five-year period.
· For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is average of two crashes per kilometre per five-year period.
· Value of works between $2,000 to $3,000,000
· Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 1.0.
Successful State Black Spot projects are funded two-thirds by the Program and one-third by Council.
The Federal Nation Building Black Spot Program is based on casualty crashes, fatalities or personal injury. The criteria for the program are as follows:
· For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is three casualty crashes over a five-year period.
· For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is one casualty crash per kilometre per five years period.
· Value of works between $2,000 to $2,000,000
· Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 2.0
Successful Nation Building Black Spot projects are fully funded by the Program.
Detail
Administration has investigated the qualifying accident locations supplied by MRWA, for each of the programs to determine the appropriate remedial treatments and cost.
In some cases where qualifying accident locations are on distributor roads already listed for major upgrades and where the Black Spot treatment would have a short life of, less than five years, then expenditure of municipal funds on these Black Spots was not considered justified.
Dependent on the proposed treatment, cost and the resultant BCR, projects are nominated for either or both the State and Federal Nation Building Black Spot programs. In past years Federal Nation Building Black Spot projects have required a BCR of 3.3 or greater to be successful.
Funding for proactive projects, where potential hazards exist, is also available based on the recommendation of a Road Safety Audit.
It is anticipated that the Metropolitan Regional Road Group (MRRG) will assess nominations during October 2011 and that the Minister for Transport will announce the approved projects in May 2012 in time to allow Local Government to finalise their 2012/13 budgets.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The sites recommended for nomination, their traffic/road safety issues and proposed remedial treatments are as follows:
1. Caporn Street/Franklin Road/Rousset Road, Mariginiup (Stage 2)
Concern
Caporn Street as the terminating leg of a ‘T’ intersection under ‘Give Way’ priority control. However, the dominant traffic flow is between Caporn Street and Franklin Road and drivers on Caporn Street frequently fail to yield to Franklin Road, Rousset Road through traffic. There have been two casualty and seven property damage crashes over five years.
Treatment
Construct an intersection median on Caporn Street and a left turn auxiliary lane on Frankin Road. Stage 1 of the project including detailed design, land acquisition and service relocation will occur during 2011/12. Refer Attachment 1 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2523-4-0.
2. Marmion Avenue/Hester Avenue/Anchorage Drive (North), Mindarie
Concern
This intersection is ranked second in the City for the number of crashes over 5-years. There have been 139 crashes, of which 21 have resulted in casualties, with sideswipes being over-represented as a crash type when compared to State network average.
Treatment
The proposed remedial treatment is based on a MRWA traffic modelling study of this intersection, designed to improve serviceability and throughput.
This proposal is to construct bypass lanes on the northern and eastern approaches to the roundabout. Refer Attachment 2 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2378-1-1.
3. Alexander Drive/Marangaroo Drive, Alexander Heights
Concern
This intersection is controlled by traffic control signals (TCS) and is ranked third in the City for the number of crashes over five years. There have been 131 crashes resulting in 35 casualties with right turn against crashes over-represented when compared to the State network average.
Treatment
The proposed remedial treatment is based on the recommendations of a Micro Analysis Report prepared by MRWA into the 10 worst metropolitan intersections.
This proposal is to construct left turn storage lanes and upgrade splitter islands to 70° entry angle on northern and western approaches to intersection; and install a TCS mast on northern approach. Refer Attachment 3 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2716-1-0.
4. Baltimore Parade/Hester Avenue, Merriwa
Concern
Baltimore Parade is the terminating leg of a ‘T’ intersection with Hester Avenue. There have been 17 crashes over five years of which 13 were right turn rear end crashes on Baltimore Parade.
Treatment
Install skid resistant treatment on northern approach to the intersection. Refer Attachment 4 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2717-1-0
5. Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way, Merriwa
Concern
Jenolan Way is the terminating leg of a ‘T’ intersection with Baltimore Parade. A single vehicle motorcycle fatality occurred in the vicinity of the intersection in 2009.
Treatment
The proposed remedial treatment to construct a roundabout was endorsed by Council in its response to the Fatal Crash Location Report (IN07-02/11 refers). Refer Attachment 5 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2708-1-0.
6. Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive, Merriwa
Concern
Greyhound Drive is the terminating leg of a ‘T’ intersection with Baltimore Parade. There have been six crashes over five years, with right turn and right angle crashes over-represented.
Treatment
The proposed remedial treatment to construct a roundabout was endorsed by Council in its response to the Fatal Crash Location Report into a single vehicle motorcycle fatality that occurred in the vicinity of the Baltimore Parade/ Jenolan Way intersection (IN07-02/11 refers). Refer Attachment 6 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2710-1-0.
7. Hartman Drive/Motivation Drive, Wangara
Concern
There have been 31 crashes at this roundabout over five years with sideswipes being over-represented.
Treatment
Reduce the reverse curve on the southern exit from the roundabout. Refer Attachment 7 for the concept plan, Drawing No 2707-1-0.
8. Koondoola Avenue, Koondoola
Concern
There have been 13 night time crashes along Koondoola Avenue over five years.
Treatment
Upgrade street lighting to Australian Standard AS1158.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A summary of the estimated costs of the proposed Black Spot treatments is tabled below:
Project |
Benefit Cost Ratio |
Project Cost |
CoW Funding Level |
State Funding Level |
Federal Funding Level |
1. Caporn Street/ Franklin Road/ Rousset Road, Mariginiup |
RSA |
$279,000 |
$93,000 |
$186,000 |
|
2. Marmion Avenue/ Hester Avenue/ Anchorage Drive (North), Mindarie |
1.57 |
$1,000,000 |
$333,333 |
$666,667 |
|
3. Alexander Drive/Marangaroo Drive, Alexander Heights |
4.19 |
$300,000 |
$100,000 |
$200,000 |
$300,000 |
4. Baltimore Parade/ Hester Avenue, Merriwa |
1.92 |
$35,000 |
$11,667 |
$23,333 |
|
5. Baltimore Parade/ Jenolan Way, Merriwa |
RSA |
$180,000 |
$60,000 |
$120,000 |
|
6. Baltimore Parade/ Greyhound Drive, Merriwa |
1.11 |
$130,000 |
$43,333 |
$86,667 |
|
7. Hartman Drive/ Motivation Drive, Wangara |
1.12 |
$60,000 |
$20,000 |
$40,000 |
|
8. Koondoola Avenue, Koondoola |
1.47 |
$70,000 |
$23,333 |
$46,667 |
|
TOTALS: State funding only |
$2,054,000 |
$684,666 |
$1,369,334 |
|
|
If Federal funding is successful |
$2,054,000 |
$584,666 |
$1,169,334 |
$300,000 |
Projects approved under the Federal Nation Building Black Spot Program are fully funded by the program, however, those projects that miss out on Federal funding may be successful for State Black Spot funding.
Successful project nominations in the 2012/2013 State Black Spot Program are required to be funded one-third by the Council. Should Council be successful with all its applications through the State Black Spot Program, then the City will be required to contribute an amount of $684,666 towards the total cost of $2,054,000. This is well within the funding allocation in the 10-Year Strategic Financial Management Plan 2011/12 to 2020/2021 which lists a total amount of $3,759,000 towards Black Spot upgrade projects for 2012/2013 with a $1,253,000 allocation from municipal funds.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the following City of Wanneroo projects for funding in the 2012/2013 State and Nation Building Black Spot Programs:
Project - Proposed Treatment |
1. Caporn Street/Franklin Road/Rousset Road, Mariginiup- construct intersection median on Caporn Street and a left turn auxiliary lane on Frankin Road. |
2. Marmion Avenue/Hester Avenue/Anchorage Drive (North), Mindarie - construct bypass lanes on northern and eastern approaches to the roundabout. |
3. Alexander Drive/Marangaroo Drive, Alexander Heights - construct left turn storage lanes and upgrade splitter islands to 70° entry angle on northern and western approaches to intersection. Install a traffic control signals mast on the northern approach. |
4. Baltimore Parade/Hester Avenue, Merriwa - install skid resistant treatment to northern approach to the intersection. |
5. Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way, Merriwa - construct a roundabout. |
6. Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive, Merriwa - construct a roundabout. |
7. Hartman Drive/Motivation Drive, Wangara - reduce the reverse curve on the southern exit from the roundabout. |
8. Koondoola Avenue, Koondoola - upgrade street lighting to Australian Standard AS1158. |
2. NOTES the draft 2012/2013 Traffic Treatments Program will require amendment to reflect the funding of projects approved through the 2012/2013 State and Nation Building Black Spot programs.
Attachments:
1. |
Black Spot Caporn Street/Franklin Road Concept 2523-4-0 |
11/85416 |
|
2. |
Black Spot Marmion Avenue/Hester Avenue/Anchorage Drive Concept 2378-1-1 |
11/85448 |
|
3. |
Black Spot Alexander Drive/Marangaroo Drive Concept 2716-1-0 |
11/85430 |
|
4. |
Black Spot Baltimore Parade/Hester Avenue Concept 2717-1-0 |
11/85424 |
|
5. |
Black Spot Baltimore Parade/Jenolan Way Concept 2708-1-0 |
11/85435 |
|
6. |
Black Spot Baltimore Parade/Greyhound Drive Concept 2710-1-0 |
11/85420 |
|
7. |
Black Spot Hartman Drive/Motivation Drive Concept 2707-1-0 |
11/85434 |
|
8. |
Black Spot Koondoola Avenue Street Lighting Concept |
11/85445 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 255
IN05-08/11 Temporary Road Closure - Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsanto Street, East Landsdale
File Ref: 3126 – 11/84180
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the temporary closure of Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsanto Street, East Landsdale to create a pedestrian zone for a building display village.
Background
The City has received a request from Development Planning Strategies Pty Ltd on behalf of Stockland WA Development Pty Ltd, the developers of ‘Corimbia’ estate, to allow the temporary closure of parts of Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsanto Street, East Landsdale, during the periods of operation of the Sales Information Office and display village.
Detail
Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsanto Street are newly created streets within ‘Corimbia’ Estate, East Landsdale. The lots within the area to be covered by the proposed temporary road closures are being developed at the display village for East Landsdale, which is expected to be operational from October 2011 until April 2014. The proposed hours of operation will be midday to 5.00pm, Monday to Friday, and 9.00am to 5.00pm, Saturday and Sunday. The area to be covered by the proposed closure is shown in Attachment 1.
The proposed road closure system will consist of a temporary manual cable gate that incorporates bollards in the verge on either side of the road to be closed and a steel cable running across the carriageway. A high visability plastic or canvas banner will hang from the cable to make the road closure visible. No pavement construction within or outside the road reserve is proposed. Signage will alert motorists to the pedestrian zone and direct them to nearby parking.
Consultation
The Director Infrastructure has delegated authority to approve the temporary closure of roads for periods exceeding four weeks, carried out in accordance with Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995
This requires the closure to be locally advertised and service authorities, public safety authorities and affected public to be notified and given the opportunity to comment. If no objections are received, then the affected roads can be temporarily closed following public notice of the order to close the thoroughfare.
Comment
Although footpaths are available along both side of Monsanto Street, Administration supports the proposed request to create a safe pedestrian precinct for the display centre.
Considering the speed of development of the existing land releases, Administration believes that new residents adjoining the display village will need to be consulted on the continued closure of the roads beyond an initial 12 months, as it may adversely affect access to their property. Provided that no objections to the closure are received, then this can be dealt with by the Director Infrastructure under delegated authority.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 controls the temporary closure of public roads. Part 2 of the (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 denotes the persons to be notified of the closures.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the initiation of the process in accordance with Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 to temporarily close parts of Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsato Street, East Landsdale, as shown in Attachment 1, from 1 October 2011 till 30 September 2012, between the hours of 12.00pm to 5.00pm, Monday to Friday, and 9.00am to 5.00pm, Saturday and Sunday;
2. NOTES that if no submissions against the temporary road closures as a result of the consultation process, then the Director Infrastructure has delegated authority to approve the temporary closure;
3. NOTES that the temporary closure may be extended on an annual basis, for a maximum of four years, subject to consultation with adjoining property owners;
4. ADVISES Stocklands WA Development Pty Ltd that they will be responsible for the costs and management of the closure and that they must indemnify the City of Wanneroo against any claim that may be made as a result of the closure; and
5. ADVISES Development Planning Strategies Pty Ltd and Stocklands WA Development Pty Ltd of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
1. |
Monticello Meander, Babylon Street and Monsanto Street, East Landsdale - Road Closure Plan |
11/86871 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 258
File Ref: 1446 – 11/84338
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group Strategic Action Plan for 2011/2012.
Background
The terms of reference for the City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group (the Working Group) requires that it develop a Strategic Action Plan (Action Plan) and have it reviewed annually. The Action Plan provides a basis for the funding of projects for the Working Group.
The current Action Plan 2010/2011 was adopted by Council at its meeting held on 7 July 2010 (Report IN01-07/10 refers).
At the Working Group Meeting held on Tuesday 21 June 2011 it was resolved.
“That the Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group supports the amendments made to the ‘Draft’ Strategic Action Plan 2011/2012 and recommends that a report be submitted to Council for their endorsement”.
Detail
The major accomplishments of the Action Plan 2010/2011 were as follows:
· The annual ‘Blessing of the Roads’ event held prior to the Easter break;
· The bi-annual ‘Caravan Trailer Safety Checks’ held prior to the Christmas and Easter breaks; and
· Driver/Reviver Program.
The proposed (Working Group) Strategic Action Plan 2011/2012 is presented as Attachment 1 and generally contains the same ongoing action items as the previous Action Plan.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The Working Group’s Strategic Action Plan 2011/2012 reflects the aims and initiatives of the State Governments Road Safety’s ‘Toward Zero’ strategy. It is designed to be easily reviewed and identifies actions to be performed with a budget for some initiatives.
The Office of Road Safety has identified the following as the main safety issues in Western Australia:
· Driving While Tired
· Not wearing seat belts
· Driving at excessive speeds and;
· Driving under the influence of alcohol.
In meeting the above objectives the following WALGA/RoadWise road safety initiatives are continuing with support by the Working Group and its volunteers.
· Safe Road Use;
· Safe Vehicles;
· Safe Speeds;
· Safe Roads and Roadsides.
Statutory Compliance
The City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group is established under the Local Government Act 1995, Part 5-Administration, Section 5.9c.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A funding allocation totalling $5,000 covering both routine operation of the Working Group and actions as outlined in the Strategic Action Plan for 2011/2012 is included in the City’s 2011/2012 Operating Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ENDORSES the City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group Strategic Action Plan for 2011/2012 as outlined in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
1. |
City of Wanneroo RoadWise Working Group Strategic Action Plan 2011/12 |
11/88370 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 262
File Ref: 3000 – 11/83961
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a petition requesting the installation of a footpath in Palm Corner, Quinns Rocks.
Background
Council received petition PT01-06/11 at its meeting of 28 June 2011. The petition reads:
“To provide a safe walkway we request the installation of a footpath along Palm Corner, Quinns Rocks (from Christian Park to Sirius Ramble)”.
The petition is signed by 49 petitioners. It is assumed that the majority are parents of students of Quinns Beach Primary School as no addresses are provided on the petition. The number of local residents supporting the petition is unknown.
Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan and Attachment 2 for an aerial view of the street.
Detail
Palm Corner is an “L” shaped access street which intersects with Sirius Ramble opposite the Quinns Beach Primary School.
The section of the street between Christian Park and Sirius Ramble is used by parents to drop-off and pick-up children at the nearby Quinns Beach Primary School. This street is also used as a pedestrian link by students living to the east of the school.
The petitioners request that a footpath be constructed on the south side of Palm Corner between Christian Park and Sirius Ramble so the students do not have to share the road with vehicles during periods of high traffic movements.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Administration considers that a footpath along Palm Corner is warranted as it provides a direct connection between the pathway network in Christian Park and the Quinns Beach Primary School.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve community safety”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The estimated cost to construct 155m of 1.5m wide footpath along Palm Corner between Christian Park and Sirius Ramble is $20,000, which can be funded from Pathways Project PR-1595 Minor Pathway Projects – Unspecified to which $40,000 is allocated in the City’s 2011/2012 Capital Works Program.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the construction of 155m of 1.5m wide cast insitu concrete footpath in Palm Corner, between Christian Park and Sirius Ramble, Quinns Rocks, at an estimated cost of $20,000 to be funded from PR-1595 Minor Pathway Projects – Unspecified; and
2. ADVISES the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
1. |
Palm Corner, Quinns Rocks - Location Map |
11/85396 |
|
2. |
Palm Corner, Quinns Rocks - Proposed Path |
11/85399 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 266
File Ref: 3000 – 11/84779
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider vehicle traffic movements within the locality of Darch following the completion of the Mirrabooka Avenue extension from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road.
Background
The extension to Mirrabooka Avenue was opened to the public in March 2011. The City has undertaken a traffic review to determine the impact of the extension on the existing local distributor roads.
Detail
The Perth metropolitan road network is based on a Functional Road Hierarchy (FRH) which defines the functions required of the road network at each level. It also provides criteria to describe each road functional type. The Perth FRH classification (Attachment 1 refers) was developed by Main Roads WA (MRWA) in consultation with Local Government in 1999. The later Liveable Neighbourhoods planning guide proposes an alternative set of criteria (Attachment 2 refers).
The FRH classifies Mirrabooka Avenue as a “District Distributor A” while the majority of the remaining roads investigated constitute the internal Local Distributor Road (Neighbourhood Connector) network for Darch.
Mirrabooka Avenue, Kingsway, Landsdale, Driver and Furniss Roads have posted speed limits of 60km/h, while the other local distributor roads listed operate under the default “built-up area” speed limit of 50km/h.
Commencing eight weeks after the opening of the Mirrabooka Avenue extension to the public, the City undertook a series of traffic surveys on the distributor road network for Darch. Using the data collected, each location was assessed using the City’s Traffic Management Investigation and Intervention Policy (TMIIP) to determine if traffic management remedial works are required.
The TMIIP assessment considers a range of criteria including:
· Speed
· Traffic volume
· Crash history
· Road design and topography
· Vulnerable road users – pedestrian/cyclists
and requires an area to be 90% developed and occupied, with a score of >60 to qualify for traffic management treatments, while scores between 30 and 60 points indicate a need for increased attention to law enforcement and driver education.
A list of survey sites and results are listed below:
Pre AWT – Average weekday traffic volume in vehicles per day before the opening of the Mirrabooka Av extension.
Post AWT - Average weekday traffic volume in vehicles per day after the opening of the Mirrabooka Av extension.
85%ile Speed - The speed in kilometres/hour at or below which 85% of vehicles are travelling after the opening of the Mirrabooka Av extension.
(99) The posted speed limit for the road
No. |
Location |
Pre |
Post AWT |
85%ile |
TMIIP |
|
1 |
Mirrabooka Av – N of Hepburn Av |
|
5945 |
70 (60) |
|
|
2 |
Mirrabooka Av – S of Kingsway |
|
7925 |
80 (60) |
|
|
3 |
Mirrabooka Av – N of Kingsway |
|
6444 |
75 (60) |
|
|
4 |
Mirrabooka Av – N of Furniss Rd |
|
4238 |
75 (60) |
|
|
5 |
Furniss Rd – E of Driver Rd |
2387 |
3778 |
74 (60) |
95 |
|
6 |
Furniss Rd – W of Driver Rd |
5287 |
2925 |
71 (60) |
86 |
|
7 |
Driver Rd – N of Westport Pde |
5559 |
2399 |
71 (60) |
62 |
|
8 |
Driver Rd – S of Westport Pde |
5339 |
2267 |
70 (60) |
71 |
|
9 |
Tullamore Dr – S of Mullingar Wy |
|
893 |
33 |
51 |
|
10 |
Tullamore Dr – E of Portroe Wy |
593 |
614 |
57 |
45 |
|
11 |
Tullamore Dr – N of Sutton Wy |
|
358 |
49 |
28 |
|
12 |
Tullamore Dr – S of Ashdale Bvd |
|
706 |
57 |
23 |
|
13 |
Ashdale Bvd – N of Westport Pde |
|
1333 |
54 |
26 |
|
14 |
Ashdale Bvd – N of Kingsway |
|
3013 |
51 |
34 |
|
15 |
Westport Pde – E of Hartman Dr |
|
2913 |
64 |
57 |
|
16 |
Westport Pde – W of Carlingford Dr |
|
2178 |
57 |
36 |
|
17 |
Westport Pde – E of Ashdale Pde |
|
1444 |
56 |
|
|
18 |
Carripan Rd – S of Westport Pde |
1253 |
712 |
48 |
49 |
|
19 |
Carlingford Dr – S of Westport Pde |
|
1024 |
51 |
35 |
|
20 |
Kingsway – E of Driver Rd |
|
5348 |
61 (60) |
|
|
21 |
Landsdale Rd – E of Hartman Dr |
2554 |
2241 |
65 (60) |
73 |
|
22 |
Landsdale Rd – W of Mirrabooka Av |
|
828 |
66 (60) |
58 |
|
23 |
Evandale Rd – S of Kingsway |
8878 |
3704 |
53 |
41 |
|
24 |
Boscastle Wy – S of Kingsway |
731 |
777 |
48 |
16 |
|
25 |
Danti Lnk – S of Kingsway |
|
572 |
44 |
9 |
Refer to Attachment 3 for a map of counter locations.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken in the preparation of this report.
Comment
Overall, an analysis of the traffic survey results listed above shows that there has been a significant reduction in traffic volumes on north-south distributor roads such as Evandale and Driver Roads. This was expected, as this traffic can now use Mirrabooka Avenue instead of the local distributor network. For east-west local distributors there is little change.
The small reduction along Landsdale Road east of Hartman Drive is less than expected considering it has now been split into two, preventing through traffic between Hartman Drive and Alexander Drive. This may reflect purely local traffic accessing the neighbouring residential area.
In 2001, when the default ‘built-up area’ speed limit was reduced from 60km/h to 50km/h the existing roads of Kingsway, Landsdale Road, Driver Road and Furniss Road were still rural in nature and did not meet the definition of a ‘built-up area’ road and were consequently controlled by 60km/h posted speed limits. Since then, as the area has been urbanised, MRWA has resisted City requests to reduce the speed limit on these roads until the City can show that their operational speed has been reduced to close to the requested speed limit of 50km/h. The need to treat these roads to achieve MRWA requirements will require significant expenditure by the City.
Additionally, from the TMIIP scores listed in the table above, Westport Parade, Furniss Road, Driver Road and Landsdale Road will require traffic management treatments to reduce their operating speeds to their current speed limits.
Three schools are located along Westport Parade, between Hartman Drive and Ashdale Boulevard. Based on the TMIIP score, Administration believes that this precinct should receive priority for traffic treatment.
Furniss Road is located within the Landsdale industrial precinct and has been constructed with a 10 metre wide pavement to cater for heavy haulage vehicles and a posted speed limit of 60km/h. “Hoon behaviour” is a problem regularly reported by the residents of Tullamore Drive that back onto the Landsdale industrial area. Reducing the operating speed on this road will be difficult as traditional traffic management devices restrict the manoeuvring needs of heavy transport.
For Driver Road, subdivisional development is not yet complete along the east side, and the road has not been fully reconstructed as proposed under Agreed Structure Plan No.8, with two roundabouts along its length to be constructed. However, due to the long standing traffic issues that residents of this street have experienced and the likely long time delay before subdivision occurs, the City’s 2011/12 Capital Works Program allocates $60,000 to Project PR-2272 for the construction of interim traffic management treatments on Driver Road.
Landsdale Road, between Hartman Drive and Mirrabooka Avenue, is still undergoing subdivisional development with several large undeveloped properties along its length. There is a need to incorporate traffic treatments along the length of this road as development occurs.
While the TMIIP score for Kingsway, based on its current posted speed limit 60km/h, does not justify treatment, the need to undertake traffic calming along Kingsway through Madeley has previously been recognised by Council. At its meeting of 19 October 2010, Council considered Report IN05-10/10 Madeley – Review of Traffic Flow Following Construction of the Hartman Drive Extension, and resolved to “REQUESTS Administration to develop a traffic management scheme for Kingsway, Madeley for presentation to Council within the next 12 months”. As a consequence, the City’s 2011/12 Capital Works Program, $100,000 has been allocated to project PR-2269 for the construction of traffic management treatments at the intersection of Kingsway and Regency Avenue.
Administration believes the most cost effective way to treat Furniss, Driver and Landsdale Roads, which are still undergoing development, is to use temporary speed cushions that in future years can be relocated to other sites when more permanent treatments are in place.
In accord with the reason for Council’s alternative motion to Report IN07-11/10 Anchorage Drive - Speed Zone Review that “The community should be consulted prior to an arbitrary speed limit change being initiated”, Administration recommends that the community be consulted regarding the support for reducing the speed limit on Kingsway, Driver Road, Landsdale Road and Furniss Road from 60km/h to 50km/h. Following this consultation, Council can then consider whether traffic treatment to achieve this speed is warranted.
The recently completed Mirrabooka Avenue extension between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road has been designed and constructed for a speed limit of 70km/h, however, MRWA has chosen to set the posted speed limit at 60km/h. The recorded speeds along Mirrabooka Avenue indicate that the operating speed for most road users is between 70 and 80km/h and the lower posted speed limit is not being adhered to. Administration believes the posted speed limit for the Mirrabooka Avenue extension should be set at 70km/h which is in keeping with the road environment and the road design speed.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.5 Improve transport options and connections”
Policy Implications
The City’s Traffic Management Investigation and Intervention Policy is applicable to this report.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. REQUIRES Administration to develop a traffic management plan for Westport Parade and report the results of community consultation based on that plan to Council within the next 12 months;
2. REQUIRES Administration to consult with the community to determine the level of support for a reduction in the speed limit on, Driver Road, Furniss Road Kingsway and Landsdale Road from 60km/h to 50km/h, and present the results to Council within the next 12 months; and
3. REQUESTS Main Roads WA to conduct a speed limit review of Mirrabooka Avenue between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road with a view to increasing the posted speed limit to 70km/h.
Attachments:
1. |
Functional Road Hierarchy Criteria |
11/86761 |
|
2. |
Liveable Neighbourhoods - Road Hierarchy Criteria |
11/86764 |
|
3. |
Darch Traffic Review - Traffic Counter Locations |
11/86816 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 271
Functional Road Hierarchy Criteria
Community Development
File Ref: 1977 – 11/90857
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a proposal that the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre seeks endorsement to become a Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR).
Background
Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR) endorsement is the approval process for organisations that want to be endorsed by the Australian Tax Office as DGRs. All DGRs must be endorsed by the Tax Office, unless they are listed by name in the tax law.
There are two types of DGR endorsement:
1. Where an organisation is endorsed as a whole; and
2. Where an organisation is endorsed for the operation of a fund, authority or institution that it owns or includes
Gifts or donations donated to the organisation or its fund, authority or institution are tax deductible. A donor can be an individual or an organisation.
Detail
The income tax law determines which organisations can receive income tax deductible gifts. To be endorsed as a DGR, an organisation, or the fund, authority or institution that it operations must fall within a general DGR category as specified by the tax law.
The organisation or fund, authority or institution must also be in Australia, have an Australian Business Number, have acceptable dealings with the transfer of surplus gifts and deductible contributions on winding up or revocation of endorsement, satisfy the gift fund requirements, and apply to the Australian Tax Office for endorsement as a DGR.
The Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre is eligible under General Category 12.1.5 – Institution consisting of a public library, public museum and public art gallery or of any two of them.
The characteristics of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre which make it eligible are:-
1. It is owned or controlled by a government or quasi government authority, or by persons or an institution having a degree of responsibility to the public;
2. Its collection is made available to the public;
3. It is constituted as a library, museum or art gallery, other people recognise it as such, and it conducts itself in the ways that are consistent with such a character; and
4. It is an institution.
The Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre would be seeking DGR endorsement using the second endorsement option where a fund, authority or institution that is operated by an organisation falls within a DGR category. For this type of endorsement it is the organisation that must be endorsed but it is endorsed only for the particular fund, authority or institution.
To be successful in endorsement the organisation must maintain a gift fund. In this instance the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre would operate the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre (WLCC) Gift Fund. Gifts or donations to other council projects would not be deductible.
A gift fund:-
· Is maintained for the principal purpose of the fund, authority or institution;
· All gifts, and deductible contributions, of money or property for that purpose are made to it;
· Any money received by the organisational, because of such gifts or deductible contributions, are credited to it;
· It does not receive any other money or property;
· The fund is used only for the principal purpose of the fund, authority or institution; and
· The organisation is required by a law, its constituent documents or governing rules, to transfer any surplus assets of the gift fund to another gift deductible fund, authority or institution when the fund, authority or institution is wound up or the DGR endorsement is revoked, whichever occurs first.
The gift fund needs to be set up as part of the organisation, it may have its own rules, constitution or they may be part of the governing documents of the organisation.
The rules or governing documents should provide evidence of the gift fund’s existence, name, purpose and operations. A proposed policy and management procedure are attached as Attachment 1 – Management Procedure and Attachment 2 - Policy.
A gift fund can receive either gifts or deductible contributions, or both.
Essential to the running of a gift fund is the separate recording of:-
· All gifts and contributions through a bank account or other cash management system for money, and a register for property;
· Transfers from the gift fund, whether as payments, disbursement or for use by the fund, authority or institution; and
· Investment returns on money, or property that has been transferred out.
The money and property of the gift fund must be clearly separate from that of the rest of the organisation and accounted for accordingly.
A gift, and deductible contribution, must be used only for the principal purpose of the fund, authority or institution to which that gift or contribution was made. For example, the South Australian Library Foundation’s current appeal is the SA Memory project. SA Memory is a multimedia website http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au that highlights South Australia's people, places, issues and events from the colony's beginnings until now.
To be tax deductible a gift must:
· Be made to a DGR;
· Really be a gift;
· Be a gift of money or a certain type of property; and
· Comply with any relevant gift conditions.
Characteristics of a gift are:
· There is a transfer of money or property;
· The transfer is made voluntarily;
· The transfer arises by way of benefaction; and
· No material benefit or advantage is received by the donor.
Acknowledgement of gifts can include stickers, plaques, mention in a newsletter or periodical. Acknowledgement as a form of advertisement is not permitted as this would prevent the payment from being a gift.
Consultation
Research has been undertaken into public libraries, museums and art galleries which have been endorsed as DGRs. Other organisations were contacted for information and these included the State Library of Western Australia Foundation, State Library of Queensland Foundation, Wollongong City Council, Town of Alice Springs and Curtin University.
Comment
Utilising a DGR strategy has the potential to broaden the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre income base incorporating new funding sources as well as retaining conventional income streams. In addition DGR status will potentially allow the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre to develop its collections, deliver a wider range of programs, undertake fundraising activities and build its growing profile in the community.
The creation of a gift fund will in no way undermine the City’s brand or reduce the Council’s capacity to determine the way in which the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre is operated and promoted. Promotion of the gift fund will need to be undertaken in order to achieve maximum benefits from the proposed DGR status.
Administration will disclose in the annual report all gifts received during each financial year.
Statutory Compliance
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
The recommended new policy establishes guidelines for the setting up and maintenance of a Gift Fund, which is required for Council to be eligible for registration as a Deductible Gift Recipient under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.
Financial Implications
There are no costs expected in the steps required to obtain Deductible Gift Recipient status. Minimal operational costs may be incurred once status is achieved, in advertising that endorsement, but which should be more than matched by contributions received.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS the Deductible Gifts Register Management Procedure as shown in Attachment 1; and
2. ADOPTS Deductible Gifts Register Policy as shown in Attachment 2.
Attachments:
1. |
Management Procedure |
11/87656 |
Minuted |
2. |
Policy |
11/87654 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 292
Program Services
File Ref: 4172 – 11/87189
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the outcomes of consultation for the Kingsway Regional Playground concept plan.
Background
High levels of population growth and the creation of new communities at a rapid pace within the City of Wanneroo increase the need for planning and provision of community services and facilities. The City seeks to create healthy communities that foster an identity, that promote lifestyle choices and the provision of quality services and infrastructure. To assist in achieving this goal a regional playground is planned within the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex.
This project is an element of the six stage Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Master Plan. The $22 million redevelopment was approved by Council in 2005 and reviewed in 2010 and includes a variety of upgrades to the site in both passive and active recreation.
Works include
· Increased passive recreation through the incorporation of playgrounds, recreational paths and picnic sites;
· Refurbishment of existing active components such as playing fields, replacement of irrigation and electrical systems, sports and amenities buildings and floodlighting;
· Additional active playing fields; and
· The upgrade and additional car parking within the complex.
Detail
The playground development is proposed to be located in the passive area north of the completed soccer and rugby zone of the complex. The concept plan features one major playground and offers six options for two proposed satellite (smaller) play equipment stations – with three options offered in both the western and eastern sites of the complex (see Attachment 1 – Site Plan)
The major playground (see Attachment 2 – Master Plan) focuses on incorporating nature based play and adventure, complemented with off the shelf play equipment.
Proposed features include:
· The development of an integrated path network throughout the park using concrete, pine bark mulch and compacted limestone;
· Limestone stepping stones, timber logs;
· Boulders, rocks and spalling;
· Play, fitness and musical equipment;
· Fencing; and
· Artworks.
Consultation
The City’s Community Consultation Review Panel endorsed a consultation strategy in June 2011 which included:
· Distribution of a draft concept plan and public comment form to all residents within a 400 metre radius of the perimeter of Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex;
· Inclusion of information and comment opportunity on the City’s website via ‘Your Say’;
· An on-site community meeting held on Monday 18, July 2011 to give local residents the opportunity to discuss the concept plan in person, on site with Administration; and
· Installation of a large sign displaying the concept plan and inviting comment.
The draft concept plan was released for public comment for a period of 29 days from Friday 1 July to Friday 29 July 2011 inclusive. A total of 79 public comment forms were received during this period, with 73 respondents supporting the draft concept plan (92%) and 6 respondents (8%) opposing the park development in its proposed format.
Of the 92% positive responses, the majority were generally supportive of the concept plan as presented. Whilst happy with the plan, questions were asked about the fencing to be installed around the park, the type of playground equipment to be installed, and raised concerns about parking facilities available when sporting activities are carried out on the weekends, after school and on weekdays.
Eight percent of responses received voiced the opinion that local undeveloped passive parks in Madeley such as Keith Griffith and Amstel Park should be considered before any Kingsway development. Concerns were also voiced about the proposed musical equipment to be installed in the park citing noise disturbance to surrounding residents as an issue to be considered.
The two preferred locations for the satellite playgrounds identified from the survey were 1A (with a 62% response rate for the western element) and 2B (with a 60% response rate for the eastern element).
Position 1A on the western side is the proposed location on the Cricket/Hockley oval with respondents citing the closeness to car parking as the main reason for their decision.
The eastern side favoured position 2B, was recommended because of its close proximity to the football clubrooms. It must be noted that further investigation must be conducted for the proposed satellite sites to ensure sporting activities are not inconvenienced by the locations.
Please refer to (Attachment 3 – Public responses) for details of the public comment received.
Comment
In relation to comments concerning the development of passive parks in the Madeley area, frequent requests and petitioning from local residents over the past 4 years has resulted in completed park upgrades to Winston and Old Trafford Parks. Further to these requests, the City has scheduled construction of Keith Griffith Park and Stage one of a two staged development for both Amstel and Cheltondale Parks in the 2011/12 financial year.
Details on playground equipment to be installed at Kingsway will be finalised during the detailed design process but the draft concept featured 12 items of fitness equipment, musical play equipment ranging from sonic benches, harp and thong drums (subject to an acoustic report). Other items to be considered are a giant birds nest swing and slides.
In response to concerns regarding the installation of musical play equipment inside the playground, Administration believes the central location of the playground within the Kingsway Complex will ameliorate the impact of local residents and can be managed within acceptable standards. It also should be noted that no sporting user groups listed the proposed equipment as a concern.
Concerns surrounding car parking availability on weekends is justified considering that the majority of sporting fixtures occur during this time. During the redevelopment of the complex, the City has focused on providing increased facilities to cater for sports participants and spectators. This focus has seen approx 1500 parking bays located within the complex with approximately a further 150 to be added during the stage five redevelopment phase. It is also anticipated that much of the playground usage during peak times will be from families who are already in attendance as a result of participation in sports activities.
The City understands the responsibility of providing safe and enjoyable play spaces for the local community and the fencing indicated on the draft concept plan will be further considered by the project technical reference group with the aim of delivering a safe and more aesthetically pleasing concept for the park.
The development of the Kingsway Regional Playground in accordance with the proposed Concept Plan will provide valuable amenity not only for local residents but visiting sporting club members to a regional level, and ensure a balance between meeting community needs and expectations, and the City’s responsibility towards the environment. It is therefore recommended that Council endorse the Kingsway Regional Play Ground Concept Plan and resolve to proceed with detailed design and development works.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A sum of $300,000 was allocated in the 2010/11 capital works budget for the design consultancy, consultation and partial contributions to works. The balance of funds from this project has been carried forward to complement a further $350,000 allocation for works within the 2011/12 Capital Works Program - Kingsway Regional Playground (project No. PR-2086). The detailed design process will enable a more accurate cost estimate to be developed to inform the staging of works. Administration is also exploring sponsorship and grant funding opportunities to enable optimum delivery of play equipment for this project.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ENDORSES the Kingsway Regional Playground Concept plan as presented in Attachment 1 and proceeds with detailed design and tender processes.
Attachments:
1. |
Site plan |
11/87568 |
Minuted |
2. |
Master Plan |
11/87566 |
|
3. |
Public Responses |
11/91103 |
|
KINGSWAY REGIONAL PLAYGROUND – CONCEPT PLAN
Do you support the development of Kingsway Regional Playground as proposed by the Concept Plan?
Yes 73 (92%)
No 6 (8%)
If no, could you please outline the reason why?
“the proposed area is already too busy and parking becomes a problem” |
“there is enough for children, use money for the elderly e.g. seats bird life” |
“I think the money should be used for more regional playgrounds throughout Madeley i.e. Amstel or Cheltondale” |
“the playground should be where the BBQ’s are now . Proposed playground should be for parking” |
The Kingsway Regional Playground Master Plan draft concept offers two zoned options for the location of satellite playgrounds to be located away from the major playground.
Which one of the Cricket/ Soccer Zone options do you prefer and why? (1A, 1B or 1C)
· 1A 45%
· 1B 17%
· 1C 37%
Comments for preferred option 1A
“more visible site less likely to be vandalised” |
“because of its geographical position” |
“well situated to all grounds in that region and traffic flow minimal” |
Which one of the Cricket/ Soccer Zone options do you prefer and why? (2A, 2B or 2C)
· 2A 20%
· 2B 51%
· 2C18%
Comments for preferred Option 2B
“easier to safest and easier access” |
“close to the car park away from traffic” |
“good parking area for parents brining children to playground” |
Are there any further comments you wish to make in regard to the Kingsway Regional Playground Master Plan
“sooner the better the complex is a credit to you” |
“kids are looking forward to it and like the plan” |
“concerns had having children crossing Hartman Drive” |
“we love it and think what you have done is wonderful job. And we are very blessed because it’s so close to our home” |
“parking is a concern as it will be competing with sports safety of children also a concern.” |
“you are doing a wonderful job of the redevelopment of the area” |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 299
File Ref: 5297 – 11/89022
Responsible Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider a request from the Wanneroo City Soccer Club seeking compensation for the Club’s installation of floodlights at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in 1998.
Background
The City received a letter from the Wanneroo City Soccer Club in June 2011 advising that the Club is willing to enter into a payment plan with the City to reduce a substantial debt. Included in the letter was a request to seek some “credit” for the installation by the Club of floodlights at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in 1998, especially since the lights have also benefited other sports such as rugby and other soccer clubs who use the grounds for training or match play.
Detail
The Wanneroo City Soccer Club has a current debt to the City of Wanneroo in excess of $27,000 which is made up of seasonal team and ground fees, utilities and insurance fees, and council rates. Administration has been working with the club for more than two years in order to try to reduce this level of debt whilst allowing it to continue to play and generate income from its use of City facilities. This support has included advice and a request for the development of a business plan which sets out the Club’s aspirations for the future and how these may be funded and achieved.
In the last few weeks, the Club has formally entered into a repayment plan with the City to enable it to clear its debt over a four year period.
During debt recovery discussions, the Club raised the issue that it had installed floodlighting to the value of $18,000 (included sponsors contributions) in 1998 and has now formally requested that there should be recognition of this from the City and an offset against rates payments for this contribution.
The City has budgeted $200,000 for works associated with improvements to the Wanneroo City Soccer Clubrooms at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in the current financial year with additional funds carried forward from last year. It is anticipated that the total cost of these improvements – new roof, ceilings, electrical upgrade – will be in the region of $250,000.
Stage 5 of the implementation of the Kingsway Master Plan project is about to commence which will see the delivery of a high standard match play field and improved training facilities and associated parking and other infrastructure prior to the start of the 2012 football season. The budgeted cost of this work is $3,730,000. New floodlighting will be installed at this time and, as with other major upgrades at Kingsway, the lighting has been designed to a practice standard for large ball sports, but with the capacity to be upgraded to match play standard at the club’s expense. It is understood that the Club has already created a significant reserve to ensure that this lighting upgrade happens at installation to support night matches and fundraising activities.
Consultation
Consultation on this matter has taken place with the Wanneroo City Soccer Club.
Comment
Administration applauds the work undertaken by Wanneroo City Soccer Club, and many other sporting and community organisations, to improve the facilities available to members and the wider community. The City has a long history of clubs building, extending and maintaining facilities using volunteer and sponsorship arrangements to enable their activities to grow and prosper. Often these improvements also benefit others who use the City’s facilities at other times or during other playing seasons. Most recently, the Kingsway Football Club has undertaken significant improvements, at its own expense, as has the Wanneroo District Netball Association in planning extensions to clubrooms and disabled toilet facilities.
The City has not in the past valued these contributions for the benefits of compensation through reduced fees and charges. The impact of doing so for one organisation raises questions about the extent of liability that the City may accrue if all organisations sought similar recognition.
Over time the standard for provision of sporting grounds and club room facilities has increased and as a consequence what were once considered optional/voluntary amenities, such as floodlights, are now more likely to be considered standard. In this regard however, the City usually applies to the state government for funding assistance in the delivery of clubrooms and floodlights and, with the provision of social rooms in particular, seeks a contribution from clubs as well.
In this case, the installation of high quality floodlighting has now been approved and funded by the City as part of the Kingsway Master Plan redevelopment project and will replace the Club’s previous lighting. It is recommended that no compensation be offered for the Club’s original floodlight installation on the grounds that it is already receiving considerable benefit through both clubroom and playing field improvements and has been treated fairly by the City in the matter of outstanding debts. This recommendation is also strongly supported by the acknowledged contributions of many other clubs throughout the City and the potential flow-on impacts that this decision would have.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
The Wanneroo City Soccer Club leases a clubroom facility from the City of Wanneroo which is governed by the City’s Tenancy Policy and uses playing facilities which are governed by the City’s Facility Hire and Use Policy. These policies also acknowledge subsidies for use by both juniors and seniors.
Financial Implications
The request for compensation from the Wanneroo City Soccer Club is to the value of $18,000, but may lead to requests from other clubs in similar circumstances. The ultimate value of these requests is not able to be calculated at this time.
The City has maintained the floodlights over their life to date, including bulb replacement and other repairs.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council NOT APPROVE a reduction in the debt to the City of Wanneroo by Wanneroo City Soccer Club in recognition of the value of floodlights installed at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in 1998.
Attachments: Nil
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 1859 – 11/86822
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of July 2011, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in July 2011 -
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – July 2011 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
83653 - 83986 1328 - 1338 |
$1,326,840.09 _$9,469,681.32 $10,796,521.41
($4,107.75) ($210,400.39) ($1,942,496.80) ($8,639,516.47) |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – July 2011 Advance Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$8,639,516.47 $26,143.39 _$2,588,795.96 $11,254,455.82 |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – July 2011 Cell 1 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 8 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$222,703.20 $2,944.00 $783,850.73 $924,244.32 ___$8,754.55 $1,942,496.80 |
At the close of July 2011 outstanding creditors amounted to $6,218,034.72.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of cheques, electronic transfers and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of July 2011 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Majority
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of July 2011, as summarised below:-
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – July 2011 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
83653 - 83986 1328 - 1339 |
$1,326,840.09 _$9,469,681.32 $10,796,521.41
($4,107.75) ($210,400.39) ($1,942,496.80) ($8,639,516.47) |
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – July 2011 Advance Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$8,639,516.47 $26,143.39 _$2,588,795.96 $11,254,455.82 |
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – July 2011 Cell 1 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 8 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$222,703.20 $2,944.00 $783,850.73 $924,244.32 ___$8,754.55 $1,942,496.80 |
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS JULY 2011 |
|||
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
00083653 |
05/07/2011 |
T Maher |
$388.10 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083654 |
05/07/2011 |
Rates Refund |
$630.84 |
00083655 |
05/07/2011 |
Rates Refund |
$41.69 |
00083656 |
05/07/2011 |
Best In The West Sports |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Terrell Berryman At The New Under 15 State Championships Sydney NSW 1-4 July 2011 |
|
00083657 |
05/07/2011 |
Ruby WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Brandford Fisher At The New Under 15 State Championships Sydney NSW 1-4 July 2011 |
|
00083658 |
05/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Districts Netball Association |
$150.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Brittany Follett & Moeriana Bullen At The WA Schools Netball Championships Perth WA 30.07-05.08.11 |
|
00083659 |
05/07/2011 |
West Australian Volleyball Association |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Nicole Glossop At The Australian Junior Volleyball Championships Adelaide Sa 11-17 July 11 |
|
00083660 |
05/07/2011 |
AJS Motorcycle Club (Wanneroo) |
$400.00 |
- |
|
Sponsorship For Megan & Lucinda Clarke In The 2011 Australian Women’s Mototrials Training Camp Sydney NSW 16-18 July 2011 |
|
00083661 |
05/07/2011 |
Lakelands Country Club |
$500.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Ryan Peake In The Malaysian Amateur Open & Saujana Amateur Championships 19-26 May 2011 |
|
00083662 |
05/07/2011 |
David Evans Real Estate |
$350.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083663 |
05/07/2011 |
J Dennant |
$25.00 |
|
|
Refund - Desert Storm 30/06/2011 - Cancelled |
|
00083664 |
05/07/2011 |
H Stewart |
$50.00 |
|
|
Refund RAAF 17/08/2011 - Client Cancelled Program |
|
00083665 |
05/07/2011 |
T Deng |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083666 |
05/07/2011 |
L Hatter |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083667 |
05/07/2011 |
D Overall |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083668 |
05/07/2011 |
J Darnell |
$50.00 |
|
|
Refund - Desert Storm 30/06/2011 - Cancelled |
|
00083669 |
05/07/2011 |
J Edmond |
$50.00 |
|
|
Refund - Desert Storm 30/06/2011 - Cancelled |
|
00083670 |
05/07/2011 |
Lorimer Homes |
$1,085.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00083671 |
05/07/2011 |
Quinns Rocks Primary School P & C |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083672 |
05/07/2011 |
Regents Garden Residents Committee |
$500.00 |
|
|
Community Funding March 2011 |
|
00083673 |
05/07/2011 |
M & N Muski |
$67.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00083674 |
05/07/2011 |
Homebuyers Centre |
$365.44 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00083675 |
05/07/2011 |
Black Swan Taekwondo Inc |
$60.40 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Overcharge Of Hire Fee - Commercial Rate Instead Of Community Rate |
|
00083676 |
05/07/2011 |
Mt Lawley SHS P & C |
$500.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083677 |
05/07/2011 |
R Turnbull |
$50.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083678 |
05/07/2011 |
B Blackall |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083679 |
05/07/2011 |
M Coutinho |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083680 |
05/07/2011 |
J Palman |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083681 |
05/07/2011 |
B Hetebry |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083682 |
05/07/2011 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083683 |
05/07/2011 |
Quinns Districts Junior Football Club |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083684 |
05/07/2011 |
D Cook |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083685 |
05/07/2011 |
C Keating |
$400.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083686 |
05/07/2011 |
Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083687 |
05/07/2011 |
Dion Warnock |
$50.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083688 |
05/07/2011 |
Cancelled |
|
00083689 |
05/07/2011 |
Rare Budgerigar Club of WA Inc |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083690 |
05/07/2011 |
N McComas |
$59.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00083691 |
05/07/2011 |
Redray Holdings Pty Ltd ATF The Northern Land Unit Trust No 2 |
$375.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083692 |
05/07/2011 |
Australian Hearing Services |
$31.50 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083693 |
05/07/2011 |
Ross Thomas |
$600.00 |
|
|
Sale Of Artwork At CoW 2011 Art Awards |
|
00083694 |
05/07/2011 |
Leigh Crawley |
$100.00 |
|
|
Refund Of CoW Parking And Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 Infringement Notice 1005545. Infringement Withdrawn Due To Incorrect Signage |
|
00083695 |
05/07/2011 |
Gregory Mark Lyons |
$100.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Cow Parking And Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 Infringement Notice No. 1005704. Infringement Withdrawn Due To Incorrect Signage |
|
00083696 |
05/07/2011 |
Janet Lesley Seddon |
$100.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Cow Parking And Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 Infringement Notice No 1005604. Infringement Withdrawn Due To Incorrect Signage |
|
00083697 |
05/07/2011 |
Yanchep Red Hawks Cricket Club |
$75.00 |
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
00083698 |
05/07/2011 |
OPTUS PO Box 306 |
$200.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083699 |
05/07/2011 |
Century 21 Gold Realty |
$400.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083700 |
05/07/2011 |
Susan Payne |
$316.00 |
|
|
Sale Of Artwork At CoW 2011 Art Awards |
|
00083701 |
05/07/2011 |
Alinta Gas |
$233.25 |
|
|
2 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083702 |
05/07/2011 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$192.20 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083703 |
05/07/2011 |
Mary Colvin |
$210.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083704 |
05/07/2011 |
Stephen Napier Freeborn |
$390.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Support Worker |
|
00083705 |
05/07/2011 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$37.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083706 |
05/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$30.10 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083707 |
05/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$64.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083708 |
05/07/2011 |
Water Corporation |
$8,691.45 |
|
|
Joondalup Drive Tapping Water Main Relocation |
|
|
|
2 x Financial Assistance ($250.00) |
|
00083709 |
05/07/2011 |
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash |
$80.85 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083710 |
05/07/2011 |
Ms Mue Heckler |
$195.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083711 |
06/07/2011 |
Cancelled |
|
00083712 |
05/07/2011 |
Synergy |
$141,510.07 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
5 x Financial Assistance ($754.02) |
|
00083713 |
05/07/2011 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$77.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083714 |
05/07/2011 |
Susan Morrissey |
$405.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Volunteer |
|
00083715 |
05/07/2011 |
Western Power |
$4,879.00 |
|
|
Street Light Installation - Wedgetail Ramble |
|
00083716 |
05/07/2011 |
Janice Lewis |
$150.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Quinns Adult Day Centre |
|
00083717 |
05/07/2011 |
Roy Bastick |
$60.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
00083718 |
05/07/2011 |
Anne Condo |
$180.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Wanneroo Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083719 |
05/07/2011 |
Maureen Butler |
$195.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083720 |
05/07/2011 |
Butler Community Centre Petty Cash |
$17.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083721 |
05/07/2011 |
Faye Decima Marion Morgan |
$225.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Wanneroo Day Centre |
|
00083722 |
05/07/2011 |
Ms Rosie O'Carroll |
$30.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Wanneroo Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083723 |
05/07/2011 |
Teresita Patchett |
$180.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083724 |
05/07/2011 |
Mrs Hazel Walker |
$150.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083725 |
05/07/2011 |
Ms Rita Lovett |
$105.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Wanneroo Day Centre |
|
00083726 |
05/07/2011 |
Miss Wendy Stewart |
$115.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Volunteer Driver |
|
00083727 |
05/07/2011 |
Wendy Kay McMahon |
$210.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
00083728 |
05/07/2011 |
Choice |
$688.00 |
|
|
1 Year Magazine Subscription - Library Services |
|
00083729 |
11/07/2011 |
Grand Theatre Company Pty Ltd |
$130.00 |
|
|
Movie Tickets For Youth Services Outing |
|
00083730 |
11/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Villa Tavern |
$2,850.00 |
|
|
HACC Xmas In July Outing - Program Services |
|
00083731 to 00083735 |
|
Cancelled (PRINT ERROR)
|
|
00083736 |
18/07/2011 |
Raenee Barber |
$300.00 |
|
|
Cheque 83837 Amount Processed Incorrectly in System Should have been $1815.00 |
|
00083737 |
|
Cancelled |
|
00083738 to 00083752 |
|
Cancelled (PRINT ERROR)
|
|
00083753 |
12/07/2011 |
Danmar Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,445.45 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Codes Variation Fee Not Required |
|
00083754 |
12/07/2011 |
Wallis Group Pty Ltd |
$110.00 |
|
|
Refund Of Septic Tank Application - Not Required |
|
00083755 |
12/07/2011 |
Keith Hills |
$45.00 |
|
|
Partial Refund - Plans Bad Quality And Unable To Be Read |
|
00083756 |
12/07/2011 |
N Purton |
$636.00 |
|
|
Reissue Of Unpresented Cheque For Bond Refund |
|
00083757 |
12/07/2011 |
N McKay |
$19.00 |
|
|
Refund - Ten Pin Bowling - 27/07/11 |
|
00083758 |
12/07/2011 |
Quinns Rocks Primary School P & C |
$65.85 |
|
|
Donation 50% Waiver Of Fees For Hire Of Gumblossom Community Centre 02/07/11 For Quinns Rocks Primary School Quiz Night |
|
00083759 |
12/07/2011 |
School Sport WA |
$600.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Z Raykos, K Hayden And J Petreski In The Sport Australia National Alf Championships Act 22-30/07/11 |
|
00083760 |
12/07/2011 |
Woodvale Secondary College |
$3,500.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For D Atkinson, D Dixon, J McMaster, J Ollerhead, D Rooney, L Wearing And W Yang In The Secondary Schools Football Challenge Malaysia 1-5/10/11 |
|
00083761 |
12/07/2011 |
Marra Adams |
$424.45 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083762 |
12/07/2011 |
Rates Refund |
$75.40 |
00083763 |
12/07/2011 |
E Edwards |
$533.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Windscreen Damage To Vehicle - Mowing Crew On 13/06/11 At Mereworth Park |
|
00083764 |
12/07/2011 |
Paul Vayler |
$904.12 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00083765 |
12/07/2011 |
Jeff Pitt |
$9.50 |
|
|
Refund - Bibbulmum Track - 06/07/11 |
|
00083766 |
12/07/2011 |
Michael Errington |
$50.00 |
|
|
Refund - Desert Storm - 26/08/11 |
|
00083767 |
12/07/2011 |
Noelene Anthony |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083768 |
12/07/2011 |
E Salinas |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083769 |
12/07/2011 |
B Broughton |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083770 |
12/07/2011 |
S Patel |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083771 |
12/07/2011 |
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club |
$100.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083772 |
12/07/2011 |
Friendlies Chemist Ocean Keys |
$28.65 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083773 |
12/07/2011 |
Wormall Pty Ltd |
$7,458.11 |
|
|
Security Deposit Refund - Banksia Grove Stage 4A |
|
00083774 |
12/07/2011 |
Wormall Pty Ltd |
$3,520.00 |
|
|
Security Deposit Refund - Banksia Grove Stage 4B |
|
00083775 |
12/07/2011 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$76.70 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083776 |
12/07/2011 |
Alinta Gas |
$1,072.70 |
|
|
6 x Financial Assistance ($687.10) |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
00083777 |
12/07/2011 |
AMP Flexible Lifetime Super Fund |
$2,094.37 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083778 |
12/07/2011 |
Construction Training Fund |
$55,670.55 |
|
|
Construction Levy Payments 01/06-30/06/11 |
|
00083779 |
12/07/2011 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$124.60 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083780 |
12/07/2011 |
Landgate |
$613.80 |
|
|
Landgate Searches - Property |
|
00083781 |
12/07/2011 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$145.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083782 |
12/07/2011 |
Mr Evan Martin |
$235.00 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment June 2011 |
|
00083783 |
12/07/2011 |
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash |
$26.65 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083784 |
12/07/2011 |
Landgate |
$9,576.82 |
|
|
GRV Interim Vals Metro - Rates |
|
|
|
Mining Tenements Chargeable - Minimum Charge - Rates |
|
|
|
UV Interim Valuations - Rates |
|
00083785 |
12/07/2011 |
Cancelled |
|
00083786 |
12/07/2011 |
Water Corporation |
$112,650.90 |
|
|
Annual Service Charges For Various Locations |
|
|
|
3 x Financial Assistance ($961.30) |
|
00083787 |
12/07/2011 |
Zurich Client Service |
$403.83 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083788 |
12/07/2011 |
Synergy |
$32,676.35 |
|
|
7 x Financial Assistance ($907.15) |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
00083789 |
12/07/2011 |
Telstra |
$6,676.91 |
|
|
Internet/Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance ($100.00) |
|
00083790 |
12/07/2011 |
Mrs Jennifer Martin |
$206.80 |
|
|
Tennis Booking Officer/Keyholder Payment June 2011 |
|
00083791 |
12/07/2011 |
Ms Deanne Hetherington |
$197.40 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer |
|
00083792 |
12/07/2011 |
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Excess WN32334 - Insurance Services |
|
00083793 |
12/07/2011 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$28.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083794 |
12/07/2011 |
Australia Post |
$445.00 |
|
|
Mail Redirection Service - Phil Renkin Building To Locked Bag 1 |
|
00083795 |
12/07/2011 |
Navigator Applications Account |
$157.69 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083796 |
12/07/2011 |
Hostplus Superannuation Fund |
$1,080.08 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083797 |
12/07/2011 |
Westscheme |
$5,726.45 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083798 |
12/07/2011 |
MLC Nominees Pty Limited |
$772.84 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083799 |
12/07/2011 |
The Industry Superannuation Fund |
$366.48 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083800 |
12/07/2011 |
Hainsworth Programme Development Petty Cash |
$84.40 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083801 |
12/07/2011 |
Integra Super |
$540.26 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083802 |
12/07/2011 |
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund |
$364.76 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083803 |
12/07/2011 |
MTAA Superannuation Fund |
$864.22 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083804 |
12/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$30.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083805 |
12/07/2011 |
AustralianSuper |
$2,083.29 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083806 |
12/07/2011 |
Rest Superannuation |
$3,713.81 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083807 |
12/07/2011 |
Asgard Elements Super |
$171.34 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083808 |
12/07/2011 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$372.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083809 |
12/07/2011 |
Unisuper Limited |
$791.05 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083810 |
12/07/2011 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$174.55 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083811 |
12/07/2011 |
Hesta Super Fund |
$1,864.98 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083812 |
12/07/2011 |
Colonial First State Firstchoice |
$1,887.07 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083813 |
12/07/2011 |
Care Super |
$247.87 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083814 |
12/07/2011 |
Spectrum Super |
$505.69 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083815 |
12/07/2011 |
Media Super |
$475.44 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083816 |
12/07/2011 |
BT Super For Life |
$334.27 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083817 |
12/07/2011 |
Telstra Superannuation Scheme |
$1,045.08 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083818 |
12/07/2011 |
Amist Super |
$362.24 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083819 |
12/07/2011 |
Agest Administration |
$101.11 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083820 |
12/07/2011 |
Valdor Superannuation Fund |
$171.89 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083821 |
12/07/2011 |
Vision Super Pty Ltd |
$336.02 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083822 |
12/07/2011 |
Dept of Regional Development and Land |
$550.00 |
|
|
Head Lease Payment For Yanchep Lagoon Kiosk 01/07-31/12/11 - Property |
|
00083823 |
12/07/2011 |
Recruitmentsuper |
$741.09 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083824 |
12/07/2011 |
Macquarie Investment Management Ltd |
$74.45 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083825 |
12/07/2011 |
Superwrap - Personal Super Plan |
$135.42 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083826 |
12/07/2011 |
Ms Jodie Walter |
$47.00 |
|
|
Keyholder June 2011 |
|
00083827 |
12/07/2011 |
Construction & Building Unions |
$325.19 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083828 |
12/07/2011 |
Insurance Advisernet Australia Pty |
$1,056.00 |
|
|
Insurance - Liability - Uninsured Community Groups Exhibiting At WLCC 01/08/11-01/08/12 |
|
00083829 |
12/07/2011 |
Asteron Optimum - Suncorp Master Trust |
$253.48 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083830 |
12/07/2011 |
Plum Superannuation Fund |
$504.20 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083831 |
12/07/2011 |
Mr Gerald Savage |
$47.00 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
00083832 |
12/07/2011 |
Gary Bowell Super Fund |
$421.93 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083833 |
12/07/2011 |
Venetia Donnellan |
$159.80 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment June 2011 |
|
00083834 |
12/07/2011 |
Perpetual Wealth Focus Super Plan |
$157.17 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
00083835 |
12/07/2011 |
Cancelled |
|
00083836 |
12/07/2011 |
Evans & Simpson Trading |
$994.22 |
|
|
Storage Boxes For Fleet |
|
00083837 |
13/07/2011 |
Raenee Barber |
$1,515.00 |
|
|
Facilitate HEAL Sessions - Program Services |
|
00083838 |
15/07/2011 |
Cr Dorothy Newton |
$500.00 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
00083839 |
19/07/2011 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$34.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083840 |
19/07/2011 |
Alinta Gas |
$282.70 |
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance ($250.00) |
|
00083841 |
19/07/2011 |
Commonwealth Bank Wanneroo |
$244,973.52 |
|
|
Bank Cheque Made Out To: Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd - POS Credit Less Infrastructure Contribution On Subdivision Of Lots 501 Conti Road, 9603 & 9604 Pinjar Road - Projects |
|
00083842 |
19/07/2011 |
Landgate |
$513.00 |
|
|
Land Enquiries For The City |
|
00083843 |
19/07/2011 |
Fines Enforcement Registry |
$1,935.00 |
|
|
Lodgement Of 45 Infringement Records - Rangers |
|
00083844 |
19/07/2011 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$346.10 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083845 |
19/07/2011 |
Royal Western Australian Historical |
$80.00 |
|
|
Subscription For Heritage |
|
00083846 |
19/07/2011 |
Landgate |
$6,658.23 |
|
|
GRV INT VALS Metro And Fesa - Rates |
|
00083847 |
19/07/2011 |
Water Corporation |
$11,277.33 |
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
00083848 |
19/07/2011 |
Synergy |
$262,590.42 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City ($6,929.97) |
|
|
|
Streetlights 25/05-24/06/11 ($255,256.95) |
|
3 x Financial Assistance ($403.50) |
|||
00083849 |
19/07/2011 |
Telstra |
$307.41 |
|
|
Big Pond Services For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance ($237.46) |
|
00083850 |
19/07/2011 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$30.80 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083851 |
19/07/2011 |
Dept of Main Roads WA |
$2,358.18 |
|
|
Pavement Marking/Signage - Girrawheen Ave |
|
00083852 |
19/07/2011 |
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash |
$147.60 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083853 |
19/07/2011 |
WA No Interest Loans Network |
$10.00 |
|
|
Membership Fees - Funded Services |
|
00083854 |
19/07/2011 |
School Sport WA PO Box 8224 |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Jessica Gorman At The WA Schools AFL Girls 16 Years Team Event, Canberra Act 22-30 July 2011 |
|
00083855 |
19/07/2011 |
M Bello |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083856 |
19/07/2011 |
The French & Mauritian Society of WA |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083857 |
19/07/2011 |
Melanie Coutinho |
$76.25 |
|
|
Refund Of Hire Fees |
|
00083858 |
19/07/2011 |
Masterplan Consultants |
$2,710.76 |
|
|
Refund Of Portion Of Fees Not Expended Processing Amendment 112 To District Planning Scheme No 2 (64 Allinson Drive Girrawheen) |
|
00083859 |
19/07/2011 |
West Australian Little Athletics |
$500.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For J-C Smith At The Singapore/Malaysian WALA Track & Field Championships Kuala Lumpur 9-10/07/11 |
|
00083860 |
19/07/2011 |
Basketball WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Australian Junior Basketball Championships Kilsyth Victoria 9-16/07/11 |
|
00083861 |
19/07/2011 |
School Sport WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For C Omedi & H Compton Australian School Sport Championships Adelaide 14-19/08/11 |
|
00083862 |
19/07/2011 |
Rugby WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For M Gilmore In 2011 New Regional Championships 1-4/07/11 |
|
00083863 |
19/07/2011 |
Football West |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For P King In 2011 Football Federation Australia Championships For Girls Coffs Harbour NSW 10-16/07/11 |
|
00083864 |
19/07/2011 |
Elizabeth Ramsden |
$57.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
00083865 |
19/07/2011 |
Christine Hannah-Rose Patrick |
$6.00 |
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
00083866 |
19/07/2011 |
Caroll Sheehy |
$114.00 |
|
|
2 x Dog Registration Refunds - Sterilised |
|
00083867 |
19/07/2011 |
Coby Charles |
$25.00 |
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Art Workshop 15/07/11 - Due To Family Emergency |
|
00083868 |
19/07/2011 |
Daniel Low |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083869 |
19/07/2011 |
Cancelled |
|
00083870 |
19/07/2011 |
L & A Tedrick |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083871 |
19/07/2011 |
B & J Morgan |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083872 |
19/07/2011 |
BM & LA Howe |
$357.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083873 |
19/07/2011 |
D Hughes |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083874 |
19/07/2011 |
C Nield |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083875 |
19/07/2011 |
WH McCormack |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083876 |
19/07/2011 |
Essential First Choice Homes |
$1,098.87 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Withdrawn By Applicant |
|
00083877 |
19/07/2011 |
Kazroc Dance |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083878 |
19/07/2011 |
L Fowler |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083879 |
19/07/2011 |
Town of Bassendean |
$500.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083880 |
19/07/2011 |
C Welch |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083881 |
19/07/2011 |
V Jack |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083882 |
19/07/2011 |
D Siva |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083883 |
19/07/2011 |
N Macdonald |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083884 |
19/07/2011 |
N Zulueta |
$475.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083885 |
19/07/2011 |
L Barnes |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083886 |
19/07/2011 |
K Al Hussein |
$475.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083887 |
19/07/2011 |
Bella Weddings |
$850.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083888 |
19/07/2011 |
S Kerrigan |
$200.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083889 |
19/07/2011 |
D Makwana |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083890 |
19/07/2011 |
Moe Tiong |
$150.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083891 |
19/07/2011 |
Anne Hetherington |
$50.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083892 |
19/07/2011 |
B Fernandez |
$300.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083893 |
19/07/2011 |
Abeba Kebede Amssalu |
$60.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of $60.00 Non Compliance With Part Payment Arrangement On Parking Infringement Notice Number 1000429 Infringement Notice To Progress To Final Demand |
|
00083894 |
19/07/2011 |
Everdew Pty Ltd |
$102.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement Of Overpayment Of Subdivision Clearance Fees |
|
00083895 |
20/07/2011 |
Evans & Simpson Trading |
$341.37 |
|
|
Storage Bins And Metal Louvre Panels For Fleet |
|
00083896 |
25/07/2011 |
Australian Wool Testing Authority |
$65.00 |
|
|
Adhesive Labels - Health Services |
|
00083897 |
25/07/2011 |
Baker & Taylor |
$6,402.90 |
|
|
Stock Purchases For Library Services |
|
00083898 |
25/07/2011 |
Brian Zucal & Associates |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
Compensation Valuation For Lot 6 Gnangara Road Wangara - Property |
|
00083899 |
25/07/2011 |
CBC Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,904.05 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet & WRC |
|
00083900 |
25/07/2011 |
Dept of Environment & Conservation |
$27.00 |
|
|
Landscope One Year Subscription - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
00083901 |
25/07/2011 |
Dillinger Group Development Pty Ltd |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
Classification Assessment Reports - Human Resources |
|
00083902 |
25/07/2011 |
Dymocks Joondalup |
$80.97 |
|
|
Books For Books In A Bag - Library |
|
00083903 |
25/07/2011 |
Environmental Health Australia (Western Australia) |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
Attendance Of Annual Conference - April 2011 - CoW Employees |
|
00083904 |
25/07/2011 |
Fantastic Furniture |
$1,350.00 |
|
|
Furniture For Banksia Grove Community Centre |
|
00083905 |
25/07/2011 |
Harvey Norman AV/IT Superstore Malaga |
$871.00 |
|
|
Boombox With Ipod Dock For Youth Services |
|
|
|
Frost Free Fridge For Kingsway |
|
00083906 |
25/07/2011 |
Honeywell Ltd |
$1,478.13 |
|
|
Preventative Maintenance At WLCC |
|
00083907 |
25/07/2011 |
Inbooks |
$361.00 |
|
|
Books For Professional Development - Community Development |
|
00083908 |
25/07/2011 |
JE Dowling |
$200.00 |
|
|
Scrap Booking Workshop - Yanchep Community Centre |
|
00083909 |
25/07/2011 |
Joan Roberson |
$690.00 |
|
|
Art Lessons At Wanneroo Recreation Centre |
|
00083910 |
25/07/2011 |
Joanne Henderson |
$150.00 |
|
|
Craft Work For NAIDOC Celebrations |
|
00083911 |
25/07/2011 |
Mr Edward Juras |
$2,408.50 |
|
|
Carry Out Fox Control Lake Joondalup |
|
00083912 |
25/07/2011 |
Kosmic Sound & Lighting |
$1,899.00 |
|
|
Keyboard Bench & Keyboard - Community Development |
|
00083913 |
25/07/2011 |
Linda Perry |
$240.00 |
|
|
Entertainment For HACC Social Support At Stringy Bark Tavern Wanneroo 11/07/2011 - Program Services |
|
00083914 |
25/07/2011 |
Marevic Enterprises Pty Ltd |
$549.50 |
|
|
Various Landscape Supplies - Parks Maintenance |
|
00083915 |
25/07/2011 |
Ms Ngalla Maya |
$150.00 |
|
|
Yoka Dance Group Performance For NAIDOC Event |
|
00083916 |
25/07/2011 |
Merriwa Golden Girls |
$1,654.00 |
|
|
Computer Hardware For Jenolan Way & Butler Computer Lab - Funded Services |
|
|
|
Website Subscription - Folders And Paper - Photo Copy Fees - Funded Services |
|
00083917 |
25/07/2011 |
Newsouth Books |
$39.87 |
|
|
Books For Heritage & Museums |
|
00083918 |
25/07/2011 |
Newsxpress Ocean Keys |
$33.90 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Clarkson Library |
|
00083919 |
25/07/2011 |
Painted Dog Research Pty Ltd |
$7,700.00 |
|
|
NMAHS & CoW Community Health Indicator Survey - Program Services |
|
00083920 |
25/07/2011 |
Pamela Goulden |
$120.00 |
|
|
Concert Performed At Alexander Heights Day Centre - 07/06/11 |
|
00083921 |
25/07/2011 |
Personal Process Service |
$351.23 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Regulatory Services |
|
00083922 |
25/07/2011 |
Quinns Rocks Sports Club Inc |
$14,000.00 |
|
|
Contribution To Upgrade Electricity Supply - Program Services |
|
00083923 |
25/07/2011 |
Reliable Fencing |
$22,840.40 |
|
|
Supply Conservation Fencing And Rural Gates For Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
Timber Bollards - Various Locations |
|
00083924 |
25/07/2011 |
Schmeling Artvideo |
$703.00 |
|
|
Adult Bookstock For Girrawheen Library |
|
00083925 |
25/07/2011 |
State Library of WA |
$426.90 |
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges - Libraries |
|
00083926 |
25/07/2011 |
Strandbags Group Pty Ltd |
$69.00 |
|
|
Suitcase For Health Services |
|
00083927 |
25/07/2011 |
The Small Business Network Pty Ltd |
$129.03 |
|
|
Medals For Volunteers - Fire Services |
|
00083928 |
25/07/2011 |
Town of Narrogin |
$25.75 |
|
|
Lost Book Charge - To Green Angel Tower: Siege/Tad Williams |
|
00083929 |
25/07/2011 |
WA Limestone Company |
$165,434.42 |
|
|
Limestone For Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
ESL For Joondalup Drive - Engineering |
|
00083930 |
25/07/2011 |
Wanneroo IGA |
$557.24 |
|
|
Catering Supplies For Various Functions/ Departments |
|
00083931 |
25/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Motorcycles |
$902.40 |
|
|
Service To City’s Quad Bikes - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Storage Box For Quad Bike - Rangers |
|
00083932 |
25/07/2011 |
YHI Power Pty Ltd |
$154.00 |
|
|
Battery - Fleet |
|
00083933 |
26/07/2011 |
Australian Anglo Burmese Society Inc |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083934 |
26/07/2011 |
K Arnold |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083935 |
26/07/2011 |
Mario Casella & Sons Builders Pty Ltd |
$6,875.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083936 |
26/07/2011 |
L Silberman |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083937 |
26/07/2011 |
W Perreau |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083938 |
26/07/2011 |
Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd |
$200.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083939 |
26/07/2011 |
Vodafone Pty Ltd |
$200.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083940 |
26/07/2011 |
J Villarroya |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083941 |
26/07/2011 |
Northern Suburbs Stroke Support Group |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
Community Funding March 2011 - 3 Day/ 2 Night Respite Break |
|
00083942 |
26/07/2011 |
Sharlee Momsen |
$153.08 |
|
|
Refund Term 2 2011 Swim Lesson |
|
00083943 |
26/07/2011 |
S Kerrigan |
$696.00 |
|
|
Refund For Cancellation Of Facility Hire At WLCC |
|
00083944 |
26/07/2011 |
The Potters House |
$475.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083945 |
26/07/2011 |
M Carpene |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083946 |
26/07/2011 |
J Smith |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083947 |
26/07/2011 |
L Daly |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083948 |
26/07/2011 |
Ocean Church |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083949 |
26/07/2011 |
E Sabau |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083950 |
26/07/2011 |
Fahmid Imtiaz |
$450.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083951 |
26/07/2011 |
C Witcombe |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083952 |
26/07/2011 |
J Barnwell |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083953 |
26/07/2011 |
W & L Mitchell |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083954 |
26/07/2011 |
G Steigmajer & Marie-Luise Maier |
$360.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
00083955 |
26/07/2011 |
Callisthenics Association of WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For S Gallagher At The National Callisthenics Championships Gold Coast Qld 6 July 2011 |
|
00083956 |
26/07/2011 |
Lakelands Country Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Aaron Dobson School Sport National Golf Championship Adelaide 28/08-03/09/11 |
|
00083957 |
26/07/2011 |
School Sport WA |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For K Jayasuria WA Schools AFL Girls 16 Years Team Event Canberra Act 22-30/07/11 |
|
00083958 |
26/07/2011 |
Ritmico Gymnastics |
$150.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For B Wegener And Y Lozovyk At The Australian Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships Perth 11-17/07/11 |
|
00083959 |
26/07/2011 |
Lacrosse WA |
$500.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For H Simpson At The U19 World Cup To Be Held In Germany From 4-14/08/11 |
|
00083960 |
26/07/2011 |
School Sport WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Liam Driscoll And Penny-Lane Field At The National Football Team Championships To Be Held In Canberra Act From 3-9/09/11 |
|
00083961 |
26/07/2011 |
Ridgewood Athletics Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Dale Hennighan At The National Long Track Walk Championships Canberra 21/08/11 |
|
00083962 |
26/07/2011 |
High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics |
$200.00 |
|
|
Sponsorship For Alex D'Cruz At The 2011 Australian Men's Gymnastics Championships Canberra Act 14-19/07/11 |
|
00083963 |
26/07/2011 |
City of Wanneroo Social Club |
$700.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083964 |
26/07/2011 |
Cafe Elixir |
$400.00 |
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
00083965 |
26/07/2011 |
Austral Mercantile |
$398.00 |
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083966 |
26/07/2011 |
Janet Smith |
$140.60 |
|
|
Refund Hire Fees |
|
00083967 |
26/07/2011 |
Richard Matthews |
$9.50 |
|
|
Refund Ten Pin Bowling Cancelled Program |
|
00083968 |
26/07/2011 |
Patios Plus WA |
$384.52 |
|
|
Refund Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
00083969 |
26/07/2011 |
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083970 |
26/07/2011 |
Alinta Gas |
$671.05 |
|
|
4 x Financial Assistance |
|
00083971 |
26/07/2011 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$79.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083972 |
26/07/2011 |
Facility Officer WLCC Petty Cash |
$50.00 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083973 |
26/07/2011 |
Property Council of Australia WA |
$39.00 |
|
|
Subscription Renewal - Residential Developer - L Kosova |
|
00083974 |
26/07/2011 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$50.25 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083975 |
26/07/2011 |
Rangers & Safety Services Petty Cash |
$100.00 |
|
|
Cash Float For C Altman And B Host $50 Each - Rangers |
|
00083976 |
26/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$123.90 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083977 |
26/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$99.35 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083978 |
26/07/2011 |
Water Corporation |
$239.95 |
|
|
Repair Work 574/16 Indooroopilly Place Connolly |
|
00083979 |
26/07/2011 |
Synergy |
$6,056.05 |
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
3 x Financial Assistance ($550.00) |
|
00083980 |
26/07/2011 |
Telstra |
$3,173.23 |
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance ($200.00) |
|
00083981 |
26/07/2011 |
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash |
$65.90 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083982 |
26/07/2011 |
Hospitality Petty Cash |
$321.15 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083983 |
26/07/2011 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$415.75 |
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
00083984 |
26/07/2011 |
Mr Jan Augustin |
$1,075.00 |
|
|
Study Assistance - Project Management - Master Of Science - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00083985 |
26/07/2011 |
Water Corporation |
$35,231.10 |
|
|
Relocate Existing Water Main Scour Valve And Pit To New Location - Mirrabooka Avenue & Gnangara Road Landsdale - Infrastructure Projects |
|
00083986 |
27/07/2011 |
Mr Graham William Hay |
$100.00 |
|
|
Paperclay Workshop 31 July 2011 - Art N About |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$1,326,840.09 |
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER LISTING |
|||
00001328 |
01/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Minter Ellison Lawyers |
$1,547,136.51 |
|
|
Mirrabooka Avenue Land Acquisition - Property |
|
00001329 |
05/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$922.89 |
|
|
Cash Collection For The City |
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$2,241.25 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Fleet |
|
|
|
Floss and Popcorn Supply Company |
$198.00 |
|
|
Hire of Fairy Floss Machine - Wanneroo Youth Centre |
|
|
|
Ghems Holding Pty Ltd |
$192.50 |
|
|
Seed Collection For Asset Management |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$23,946.17 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Midland Construction Pty Ltd |
$45,988.80 |
|
|
Progress Payment 10 - Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubrooms - Projects |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$704,075.62 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$29,700.00 |
|
|
Install Playground Avondale Park Mindarie - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$49,507.81 |
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$93.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Information Technology |
|
|
|
Livewire Powerline Ethernet Kit - Programs Services |
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$924.00 |
|
|
Set Out And Install Spotting At Giralt Road, Marangaroo Drive, Brookway Retreat & Rosslare Promenade - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
|
00001330 |
06/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Andy Heerkens |
$190.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Bus Driver |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$62.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf |
$28,818.90 |
|
|
Commission Fees For June 2011 - Carramar Golf Course |
|
|
|
Dale Sutherland |
$210.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre Volunteer |
|
|
|
Dept For Communities |
$56.60 |
|
|
Refund Of Unexpended Grant Funds |
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf |
$9,786.81 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Material Expenditure - Quinns Caravan Park |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Eftpos Fees - Quinns Caravan Park |
|
|
|
Contract Management Fee For June 2011 - Quinns Caravan Park |
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd |
$24,786.23 |
|
|
Commission Fees For June 2011 - Marangaroo Golf Course |
|
|
|
Elizabeth Valeriani |
$150.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Wanneroo Day Centre |
|
|
|
Lisa Tiang - Alexander Heights Podiatry Clinic |
$25.00 |
|
|
Podiatry Services - Funded Services |
|
|
|
Mr Ron Hoffman |
$60.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
|
|
Mr Vernon Mortensen |
$180.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Community Bus Driver |
|
|
|
Mrs Moira Greenhalgh |
$104.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Entry To WA Tourism Awards 2011 |
|
|
|
Ms Lorraine Mortensen |
$195.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Quinns Adult Day Centre |
|
|
|
Ms Sarah McMahon |
$195.00 |
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Adult Day Centre |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$150.73 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
00001331 |
12/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$1,372.95 |
|
|
Billpay Transaction Fees - Rates |
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$247.20 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$753.20 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$346,621.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Barlow Superannuation Fund |
$7,770.08 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Builders Registration Board |
$13,510.00 |
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payments 01/06-30/06/11 |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$48.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,857.71 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,763.09 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$752.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens |
$242.88 |
|
|
Travel Expenses For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie |
$74.52 |
|
|
Travel Expenses For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$1,747.82 |
|
|
Mailroom Services For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani |
$47.00 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment June 2011 |
|
|
|
FESA |
$15,511.66 |
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For The Community Fire Manager 1/4-30/6/11 Between FESA And CoW |
|
|
|
Frank Hamilton |
$94.00 |
|
|
Keyholder For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,390.45 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super |
$270.86 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Gregory Johnson |
$291.40 |
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment For June 2011 |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$1,928.55 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Jeffrey Locke Pty Ltd |
$2,978.14 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo |
$103.40 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment For June 2011 |
|
|
|
John Everitt Superannuation Fund |
$145.94 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
LGIS Risk Management |
$33,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance - Strategic OSH Contract |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,209.80 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Local Government Planners Association |
$320.00 |
|
|
Registration - LGPA Breakfast Function - Industrial Planning 07/04/11 - Various Officer |
|
|
|
Miss Anne-Marie Gillespie |
$281.70 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Parking Expenses WAIRC |
|
|
|
Miss Rachael Duggan |
$112.00 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Spectacles As Per Policy |
|
|
|
Mr Christopher Hunt |
$138.24 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Catering Items For I Rewards Function |
|
|
|
Mr Dennis Blair |
$60.60 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage For May/June 2011 |
|
|
|
Mr John Baker |
$70.50 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty |
$141.00 |
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
Ms K Christoffelsz |
$59.80 |
|
|
Reimbursement - Paid Excess By Cash On PO 120018 |
|
|
|
Ms Karen Caple |
$26.21 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Broadband Usage 1/6-1/07/11 |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$7,147.99 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund |
$183.24 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Telstra - Plant Damages |
$318.90 |
|
|
Repair To Damaged Telstra Property - Projects |
|
|
|
The Claystone Superannuation Fund |
$318.55 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
The FIA Magid Superannuation Fund |
$380.96 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
The Michael Penson Superannuation Fund |
$1,017.28 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
The Saunders Superannuation Fund-Pac |
$107.65 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Timms Superannuation Fund |
$434.14 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$1,534.81 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Australia WA Division Inc |
$1,133.00 |
|
|
Luncheon - Developer Contributions 06/07/11 - Various Officers |
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation |
$441,704.46 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Western Power |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
Design Fee - Joondalup Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
00001332 |
12/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$241.55 |
|
|
Cash Collections For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$5,264.82 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Fleet |
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$207,785.89 |
|
|
Fuel Issues For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Di Candilo Steel City |
$387.20 |
|
|
Steel Supplies For Fleet |
|
|
|
Frogmat Environmental (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$78,422.38 |
|
|
Landscaping Works At Old Tafford Park For May 2011 |
|
|
|
George Mathews |
$450.00 |
|
|
Pesticide Training - 13 & 20 June 2011 For T Bampton - Parks |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota |
$934.80 |
|
|
Reg WN32664 - 60,000Km Service |
|
|
|
Greensense Pty Ltd |
$4,125.00 |
|
|
First Instalment - Greensense View Energy Monitoring Equipment Installation |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$24,164.51 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited |
$99.75 |
|
|
Art Supplies For Youth Services |
|
|
|
Logo Appointments |
$5,436.92 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Rates |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$245,211.76 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal Services For The City |
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management |
$1,782.91 |
|
|
Document Retrieval Services - Records |
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd |
$111.52 |
|
|
Internet Download 1725.1-10 - Health & Safety Services |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$8,695.50 |
|
|
New Pathway Turfing - Property |
|
|
|
|
|
00001333 |
15/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$466.66 |
|
|
Rates Payments For Mayor Kelly, R Steffens, D Newton From Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Alan Edwin Blencowe |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Monks |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Ian Goodenough |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gwendolyn Gray |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Maureen Grierson |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens |
$400.00 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie |
$583.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Cr Tracey Roberts |
$1,833.33 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
Mayor Jon Kelly |
$5,966.67 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
00001334 |
19/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
3 Australia |
$648.21 |
|
|
Paging Account For Fire Services |
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$10,245.63 |
|
|
Postage Charges For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Australian Library & Information Association |
$1,716.00 |
|
|
Membership 2011-2012 For Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$3,888.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$8.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$134.61 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly |
|
|
|
FESA |
$754.70 |
|
|
Annual Monitoring Fee - New Civic Centre 2011-2012 |
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$728.80 |
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
Lonnegal Property Pty Ltd |
$53,108.46 |
|
|
50% Of Costs Associated With The Kestrels Demonstration House 1/04-30/05/11 - City Business |
|
|
|
|
|
00001335 |
25/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
2020 Global Pty Ltd |
$17,956.76 |
|
|
Professional Services For Internal Audits |
|
|
|
A.C.T Industrial Ltd |
$19,442.50 |
|
|
Front Loader Bulk Bin - Waste Operations |
|
|
|
AAA Hillarys Plumbing and Gas |
$16,148.00 |
|
|
Install Internal Sewer Drainage - Quinns Rock Sports Club - Projects |
|
|
|
ABC Distributors |
$1,763.60 |
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
Aboriginal Urban Services |
$800.00 |
|
|
"Welcome To Country" - NAIDOC Event 02/07/11 - Community Links |
|
|
|
Storytelling For NAIDOC Event 05/07/11 - Community Links |
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists |
$302.50 |
|
|
Automatic Step Repairs On WN32641 - Fleet |
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies |
$26.92 |
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Engineering |
|
|
|
Acclaimed Catering |
$2,503.60 |
|
|
Catering For Various Council Functions |
|
|
|
Accord Security Pty Ltd |
$51,444.36 |
|
|
Security Patrol Service For June 2011 - City Business |
|
|
|
Action Lock Service |
$346.00 |
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Adcorp Marketing Communications |
$7,726.25 |
|
|
Advertising For The City |
|
|
|
Adform |
$2,152.70 |
|
|
Lined & Lettered Incident/Operations Boards - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Volunteer Helmet Stickers & Labelling - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
Safety Helmets - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
Adshel Street Furniture Pty Ltd |
$6,011.50 |
|
|
Relocation Of Bus Shelter - Wanneroo Road - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Advance AutoQuip |
$220.00 |
|
|
Plastic Reservoir Tanks For Vehicle Hoist - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving |
$4,284.50 |
|
|
Brick Paving To Islands Intersection Houghton & Joondalup Drive Wanneroo - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Air Communications |
$10,895.50 |
|
|
Swap Over Link At Yanchep & High Road Kingsway - 2 RF Tech Advanced Rigger |
|
|
|
Replacement Backup Spare Radio Link - IT |
|
|
|
Air Tools WA |
$417.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Airless Spray Gun - Waste |
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia |
$106.85 |
|
|
Filters For Stores |
|
|
|
Alance Newspaper and Magazine Delivery |
$20.40 |
|
|
Newspapers For Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Alchemy Technology |
$13,744.50 |
|
|
SMS Software Maintenance Upgrades - Program Services |
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$100.00 |
|
|
Mixed Sympathy Box Arrangement - Mayor's Office |
|
|
|
Allied Forklifts Pty Ltd |
$1,184.59 |
|
|
Forklift Monthly Hire/Service - WRC |
|
|
|
Allmark & Associates Pty Ltd |
$473.00 |
|
|
Various Self Inking Stamps - Planning |
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$62.50 |
|
|
Red Ink Stamp For Customer Relations |
|
|
|
Allwest Engineering Services |
$198.00 |
|
|
Eurolube Drum Pump - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$6,081.02 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
Amgrow Pty Ltd |
$16,830.00 |
|
|
Various Items For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Anaconda |
$95.98 |
|
|
Spinifex Deluxe Tri-Fold Bed - Library |
|
|
|
APMM Group |
$7,500.00 |
|
|
Certificate III In Civic Construction Plant Operations Traineeship - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Aquatic Agency |
$225.50 |
|
|
Aqquastep Standard For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Arbor Plus / Whitfords Tree Services |
$550.00 |
|
|
Hire Of Woodchipper - Parks |
|
|
|
Archival Survival Pty Ltd |
$234.84 |
|
|
Melinex Roll - Libraries |
|
|
|
Arcus Australia |
$1,468.50 |
|
|
Materials For Art Collection |
|
|
|
ARRB Transport Research Ltd |
$1,342.00 |
|
|
Workshop - Bridge Inspection 22-23/06/11 – Attendee M Oh |
|
|
|
Arrow Pressure Wash |
$423.50 |
|
|
Supply & Fit New Twin Pressure Lance - Fleet |
|
|
|
Supply Strip 6 Secondhand Guns - Fleet |
|
|
|
Art On The Move |
$150.00 |
|
|
Basic Soft Packing, Moving And Conservation Workshop At Minland Junction Arts Centre 07/07/2011 - Attendee M Stokes |
|
|
|
Artworks Conservation |
$1,485.00 |
|
|
Conservation Of Rowboat - Initial Consultation - Funded Services |
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram |
$1,249.68 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd |
$214.50 |
|
|
Hotmix For Engineering |
|
|
|
Association For The Blind WA |
$121.55 |
|
|
75mm Magnifiers - Heritage & Museum Services |
|
|
|
Ati-Mirage Training & Business Solutions |
$2,035.00 |
|
|
Training - Presentation Skills - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Aussie Gold |
$413.60 |
|
|
One Colour Print Shirts & Iron Numbers - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Assoc Ltd |
$1,605.89 |
|
|
Licence Fees - Background Music For Community Centres |
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$10,912.00 |
|
|
Training - Chasing Your Passion 14/06/11 - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Training - Effective Workplace Relationships 15/06/11 - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Training - Excel Advance Version 2007 - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Australian Paper Recovery Pty Ltd |
$132.00 |
|
|
Charges On Container FCIU8682360 For Wangara Recycling Centre |
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz |
$1,226.06 |
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$3,873.87 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Fleet |
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro |
$1,348.05 |
|
|
Truck Steam - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Avalon Canvas |
$985.60 |
|
|
2 X Tarps PVC - Wangara Recycling Facility |
|
|
|
B & S Treasure |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Weaving Workshop For WLCC |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware |
$729.37 |
|
|
Hardware Supplies For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Barrett Displays |
$1,017.50 |
|
|
Display Module At Wanneroo Library And Cultural Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Basketball Ringleader |
$84,810.00 |
|
|
Supply & Install New Basketball Backboard System - Gumblossom Community Centre, Wanneroo Recreation Centre & Hainsworth Recreation Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
BCA Consultants Pty Ltd |
$10,670.00 |
|
|
Consultancy - Banksia Room Modifications - Projects |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Air Quality At WRC |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$40,609.80 |
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess - WN32497 |
|
|
|
Belmont Carpet Court |
$165.00 |
|
|
Synthetic Lawn Adhesive - Parks |
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$11,866.98 |
|
|
Plants - Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Benchmark Projects |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
Project Management Services - Lot 2 Mather Drive Neerabup For May 2011 - Property |
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd |
$2,640.00 |
|
|
Aquamotion Electrical Consulting Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Betahose & Fittings P/L |
$4,069.80 |
|
|
Repair & Replace Hydraulic Hoses - Fleet |
|
|
|
BGC Concrete |
$2,234.76 |
|
|
Pavers For Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
BHW Consulting |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
Consulting - Part Projects Cost Health & Waste Local Laws Project |
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop Pty Ltd |
$39.78 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Bolinda Publishing Pty Ltd |
$4,745.46 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$3,150.95 |
|
|
Construction Materials Delivered To Various Locations |
|
|
|
Bosnar Engineering Pty Ltd |
$5,879.50 |
|
|
Repair Shaft To Conveyor Roller - Wangara Recycling Facility |
|
|
|
Bailer Rollers To Drawing - Wangara Recycling Centre |
|
|
|
Bowden Tree Consultancy |
$462.00 |
|
|
Arboriculture Assessment And Report For 29 Paramount Drive Wangara - Parks |
|
|
|
Arboriculture Assessment & Report For Municipal & Verge Tree Girrawheen 15/07/11 |
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$100.35 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$1,113.93 |
|
|
Vehicle Oil For Fleet |
|
|
|
BT Equipment Pty Ltd |
$662.52 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$6,027.82 |
|
|
Hardware Supplies For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Burkeair Pty Ltd |
$35,180.63 |
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
C R Kennedy & Co Pty Ltd |
$33.55 |
|
|
Blocking Levers For Survey Services |
|
|
|
Cafe Elixir |
$165.00 |
|
|
Catering For 50th Birthday Celebrations Wanneroo Library & Cultural Centre |
|
|
|
Caltex Energy |
$138.40 |
|
|
Fuel For Fleet |
|
|
|
Cameleon Paints |
$1,285.68 |
|
|
Paint For Waste Services |
|
|
|
Car Care (WA) Mindarie |
$55.00 |
|
|
Fire Truck Detail Clean - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Caravan Industry Association WA Inc |
$805.00 |
|
|
Subscription Fee - Property |
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$15,465.84 |
|
|
Disposal Of Spoils From Pinjar Road - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Castledex |
$441.79 |
|
|
Stationery For Records |
|
|
|
CE Body Builders |
$93.50 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Central Institute of Technology |
$454.00 |
|
|
Course Fees For T L De Villers & L Easson For Certificate IV In Local Government Planning Semester 1 2011 |
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$4,751.00 |
|
|
Catering For Various Council Functions |
|
|
|
Chess Moving |
$319.00 |
|
|
Office Relocation From Civic Centre To Alexander Heights Care Centre For A Adams - Funded Services |
|
|
|
Children's Book Council of Aust |
$392.50 |
|
|
Merchandise For Children’s Book Week |
|
|
|
Choice |
$688.00 |
|
|
Subscription Renewal For Libraries |
|
|
|
City Business Machines |
$2,425.51 |
|
|
Various Items For Information Technology |
|
|
|
City of Stirling |
$9.90 |
|
|
Lost Book Charges - Yanchep Public Library |
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$5,786.00 |
|
|
End Of Year Training - Financials |
|
|
|
19 Additional Trim Licences - IT |
|
|
|
Trim - Annual Maintenance - IT |
|
|
|
CJD Equipment Pty Ltd |
$541.80 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Clean It Environmental Solutions |
$1,875.50 |
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$19,222.11 |
|
|
Equipment Hire For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$1,052.20 |
|
|
Various Cold Drinks - Kingsway |
|
|
|
Coffey Commercial Advisory |
$19,954.00 |
|
|
20 % Payment Plus 20 % Phase 6 - Co Location Opportunity For Equest And Wheeled Sport Association In Wanneroo Report - Program Services |
|
|
|
Coles Supermarkets Aust Pty Ltd |
$1,014.85 |
|
|
Gift Cards For Human Resources |
|
|
|
Collins Craft & School Supplies |
$43.10 |
|
|
Various Items For Community Arts Program |
|
|
|
Colmax Glass Pty Ltd |
$6,551.49 |
|
|
Glass Recycling - WRC |
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$169.50 |
|
|
Volunteers National Police Check May 2011 |
|
|
|
Community Newspapers |
$39,983.13 |
|
|
Advertising For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Corporate Express |
$17,426.11 |
|
|
Stationery Account For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$300.63 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
Coventry Fasteners |
$17.75 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
Coventrys |
$3,435.91 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd |
$809.35 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Cutting Edges Pty Ltd |
$108.71 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited |
$564.67 |
|
|
Adobe Acrobat Professional 10 Windows - IT |
|
|
|
DBS Fencing |
$9,770.67 |
|
|
Various Works For Parks |
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,784.33 |
|
|
Various Items For IT |
|
|
|
Desert Storm Adventures |
$1,300.00 |
|
|
Desert Storm Adventure Tour - Programs |
|
|
|
Dexion Balcatta |
$403.84 |
|
|
9 X Shelves For Heritage & Museums |
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$1,598.92 |
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Dick Smith Electronics |
$164.81 |
|
|
Nokia Dc-4 2Mm Pin Car Charger - IT |
|
|
|
Headsets For NAIDOC Video - Community Links |
|
|
|
2 X Cordless Phones - IT |
|
|
|
Diplomat Blades (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$4,554.00 |
|
|
Parts For WRC |
|
|
|
Direct Door Service |
$12,477.68 |
|
|
Supply & Install 5 X Electric Motors To Selected Commercial Roller Doors - Building |
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$14,032.70 |
|
|
Signage For Infrastructure Assets And Jenolan Way Community Centre |
|
|
|
Artwork For Mindarie Homestead Sign - Community Links |
|
|
|
DME Contractors |
$297.94 |
|
|
Hartman Drive Landscaping - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Donald Cant Watts Corke (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
Cost Planning Services For Wanneroo Show Grounds Changerooms Reconstruction |
|
|
|
Dorma Movable Walls Pty Ltd |
$5,676.00 |
|
|
Gumblossom Hall Community Centre - Supply & Install Accordion Door - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Downer EDI Engineering Pty Ltd |
$8,574.97 |
|
|
Release Of Retention - Supply/Install Traffic Lights Ocean Reef Road And Hartman Drive |
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$168,589.73 |
|
|
Install Handrails At Automotive Drive |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Concrete Cricket Pitch At Lake Joondalup - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Upgrade Netball Facilities At Kingsway Netball Courts - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Pathways - Joondalup Drive, Wanneroo Road, Marangaroo Drive, Dusart Way, Waldburg, Falkner Way - Engineering |
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$6,229.00 |
|
|
Vehicle Electrical Maintenance For Fleet |
|
|
|
DVM Fencing |
$1,056.00 |
|
|
Repairs To Damaged Fence - Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Dzolv Products Pty Ltd |
$528.00 |
|
|
Glass Cleaner For Stores |
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$2,434.95 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd |
$601.35 |
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Engineering |
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd |
$176.00 |
|
|
Hyfrolab Quanta Hire - 28/06/2011 - Parks |
|
|
|
Eco-Care (WA) Pty Ltd |
$471.90 |
|
|
General Cleaning - Merriwa Office |
|
|
|
Edgewater Communications |
$176.00 |
|
|
Service Call For Phone System To 21 Landsdown Place Merriwa - IT |
|
|
|
Edgewater Veterinary Hospital |
$553.00 |
|
|
Veterinary Costs - Rangers |
|
|
|
e-Fire & Safety |
$74.25 |
|
|
Fire Extinguisher Location Signs - Fleet |
|
|
|
Elan Media Partners Pty Ltd |
$149.80 |
|
|
Stock Purchases For Library |
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms |
$1,452.00 |
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$236.50 |
|
|
Reticulation Items For Parks |
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga |
$195.09 |
|
|
Uniforms For Kingsway |
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$4,746.57 |
|
|
Ergonomic Equipment For The City |
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services |
$5,285.59 |
|
|
Inspection & Testing Of Fire Equipment For June 2011 At Various Community Centres |
|
|
|
Install Fire Extinguishers At Ashby Depot |
|
|
|
Call-Out Fees - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
EW Hawthorn |
$160.00 |
|
|
Extra Clean Up - Acrylic Art Classes - Program Services |
|
|
|
Invoice Underpaid - Acrylic Painting - Program Services |
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$726.00 |
|
|
Safety Audit On Playground At Kingsway Sporting Complex - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Playground Audit For Wonambi Park |
|
|
|
Shade Sails For Rotary Park |
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$2,720.21 |
|
|
Magazines For Libraries |
|
|
|
Fence Hire WA |
$1,280.20 |
|
|
Temporary Fences - Pinjar Road, Nanovich Park & Mary Lindsay Homestead |
|
|
|
Fifth Quadrant |
$14,377.00 |
|
|
Consultancy Support - Customer Service |
|
|
|
Find Wise |
$1,545.16 |
|
|
Location Of Services Joondalup Drive & Keenfield Drive - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA |
$8,400.15 |
|
|
Class"A" Foam 40 Litre - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Pistol Grip Fire Lozzle & Storz - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
Foodlink Food Service |
$1,261.19 |
|
|
Various Catering Items - Stores |
|
|
|
Forestvale Trees Pty Ltd |
$5,522.00 |
|
|
Agonis Flexuosa - Parks |
|
|
|
Forpark Australia |
$83,434.56 |
|
|
Removal Andd Disposal Of Existing Play Equipment Wanneroo Showgrounds - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Playgound Equipment - Parks |
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd |
$475.20 |
|
|
Brake Cleaner For Stores |
|
|
|
Friction Control |
$52.80 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$12,021.83 |
|
|
Equipment Lease, Colour Image Charge And Paper For Reprographic Services |
|
|
|
Fundamental Pty Ltd |
$435.90 |
|
|
Sausages For NAIDOC Week - Community Links |
|
|
|
Garmony Property Consultants |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
Valuation Report For Lot 105, 196 Gnangara Road Landsdale - Property |
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$27,466.45 |
|
|
Services At Various Locations For Parks |
|
|
|
Geon |
$4,488.00 |
|
|
Printing - School Parking - City Business |
|
|
|
Printing - Library Presentation Folders |
|
|
|
Glenfords Discount Tool Centre (WA) |
$296.55 |
|
|
Parts For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Repair Jackhammer - Engineering |
|
|
|
Grand Toyota |
$8,126.20 |
|
|
Vehicle Services For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Grass Growers |
$81,913.56 |
|
|
Supply Plant And Operators To Mulch Greenwaste Stockpiles At WRC |
|
|
|
Grass Roots Inc |
$944.00 |
|
|
Deposit For Conference Centre/Chalets/ Catering For HR |
|
|
|
Grasstree Exposure Services |
$4,496.25 |
|
|
Prepare, Extract/Transport 17 Grasstrees - Houghton Park |
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$5,231.38 |
|
|
Transplanted Grasstrees - Hartman Drive - Feb 2011 - Projects |
|
|
|
Watering Of Grasstrees Along Pinjar Road 31/03/11 |
|
|
|
Replant Grasstrees Marangaroo Golf Course |
|
|
|
12 Month Maintenance Program For Pinjar Road |
|
|
|
Gravity Discovery Centre |
$1,185.00 |
|
|
Lunch For Social Support Outing - Program Services |
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$1,032.90 |
|
|
Hiab Services For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Greensense Pty Ltd |
$4,125.00 |
|
|
First Instalment - Greensense View Energy Monitoring Equipment Installation |
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$1,314.15 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Greenworx |
$17,930.00 |
|
|
Landscaping Hartman Drive |
|
|
|
Gymcare |
$103.95 |
|
|
Fitness Equipment For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$3,770.36 |
|
|
Construction Materials Delivered To Various Locations |
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$142.80 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals For The City |
|
|
|
Hendercare |
$46,213.68 |
|
|
Support Services For CACP/HACC Clients |
|
|
|
Hinds Sand Supplies |
$7,469.00 |
|
|
Harley Rake Hire For Parks |
|
|
|
History Council of WA |
$50.00 |
|
|
Corporate Membership 2011/2012 - Heritage |
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$2,246.86 |
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$1,369.08 |
|
|
Support Services For CACP/HACC Clients |
|
|
|
Homecare Options |
$37,968.95 |
|
|
Corporate Membership 2011/2012 - Heritage |
|
|
|
Support Services For CACP/HACC Clients |
|
|
|
Host Direct |
$1,015.00 |
|
|
Catering Supplies For Communication & Events |
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$37,944.35 |
|
|
Construction Materials Delivered To Various Locations |
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$332,614.70 |
|
|
Capital Works Upgrade At Various Parks |
|
|
|
Testing Pump - Keith Griffith Park |
|
|
|
IBolt Fencing |
$2,195.60 |
|
|
Repair Tennis Net - Parks |
|
|
|
IFAP |
$10,142.00 |
|
|
4 x Accident Investigation Training Courses - HR |
|
|
|
IMEX Solutions WA Pty Ltd |
$1,485.00 |
|
|
Customised Trim Training - Information Technology |
|
|
|
In Line Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd |
$1,474.00 |
|
|
Temporary Fence At Old Trafford Park - Projects |
|
|
|
Independence Studios Pty Ltd |
$511.50 |
|
|
Assorted Retail Items For Funded Services |
|
|
|
InfoCouncil Pty Ltd |
$363.00 |
|
|
Support Fees For IT |
|
|
|
Information Services & Technology P/L |
$748.00 |
|
|
Migration Of Public Art Database In Collections Onto Mosaic |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$40,432.92 |
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
Intermedia Group Pty Ltd |
$48.00 |
|
|
Government News - 1 Year Special Renewal Rate - Strategy & Performance |
|
|
|
IPWEA |
$6,292.00 |
|
|
Leisure Check Visitor Measures & Leisure Check Management Measures - Wanneroo Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Seminar - Parks & Recreation 2011 26/05/11 – Attendee N Nguyen |
|
|
|
Irrigation Innovations |
$11,220.00 |
|
|
Pinjar Road Irrigation - Projects |
|
|
|
J & K Hopkins |
$429.00 |
|
|
Mobile Storage Cupboard - Libraries |
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$619.34 |
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
Jane B Blake |
$641.67 |
|
|
Transcripts For Oral History - Funded Services |
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$1,154.98 |
|
|
CD's/DVD's For Yanchep Library |
|
|
|
JCA Dealer Services |
$463.11 |
|
|
Vehicle Repairs For Fleet |
|
|
|
JDSi Consulting Engineers |
$6,050.00 |
|
|
Consulting Services - Fowey Look Mindarie - Property |
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$3,458.60 |
|
|
Medical Fees - Human Resources/Fire Services |
|
|
|
Joondalup Electrical Retail Centre |
$688.00 |
|
|
HP Officejet 6500A Printer - Facilities |
|
|
|
Toaster, Vacuum, Overload Protector & Extension Cord For Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Joondalup Office National |
$100.00 |
|
|
Brochure Holder For Library Services |
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services |
$1,380.00 |
|
|
Risk Management Course & Advanced Worksite Traffic Management - Attendee M Barua |
|
|
|
Training - Basic Worksite Traffic Management - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
Kim Nguyet Pham |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
Vietnamese Magazines From July 2011 To June 2012 - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Kings Metal Fabrications |
$154.00 |
|
|
2 Wheel Chocks - Heritage |
|
|
|
Kirby Swim Equip |
$1,177.00 |
|
|
Swim Teaching Platform - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$7,983.00 |
|
|
Graffiti Removal Throughout City Of Wanneroo |
|
|
|
Knight And Sons |
$684.25 |
|
|
Sustenance For Impounded Animals - Rangers |
|
|
|
Konekt Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,813.84 |
|
|
Ergonomic Assessment Workshop - Governance |
|
|
|
Ergonomic Assessments For Information Management |
|
|
|
Kooya Consultancy |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
Service & Delivery Of Cultural Awareness Seminar For Elected Members |
|
|
|
Kyle Promotions |
$709.50 |
|
|
Cleaning Services To Capricorn House |
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L |
$2,965.13 |
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For Various Departments |
|
|
|
L & T Venables Pty Ltd |
$374.29 |
|
|
Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire |
$343.75 |
|
|
Rental Of Plants For The City |
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$495.00 |
|
|
Wipe Typha In Church St Basin And Lake Joondalup Green Corps Planting Site- Parks |
|
|
|
Landmark |
$800.27 |
|
|
Various Items For Conservation & Parks |
|
|
|
Laser Exchange |
$220.00 |
|
|
Service Call Out To Panafax UF-590 - Finance |
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor |
$7,810.00 |
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf At Alverez Park |
|
|
|
LD Total |
$98,370.28 |
|
|
Landscaping Services For The City |
|
|
|
Lee Alexander West |
$600.00 |
|
|
Times Cultural Dance And Vocal Performance At NAIDOC Week |
|
|
|
Leon Hendroff |
$770.00 |
|
|
School Holiday Art Workshop 15/07/11 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$1,035.33 |
|
|
Group Fitness Class Licence - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Aust. |
$1,060.70 |
|
|
2011 LGMA Management Challenge Australasian Final - Sydney 23-24/06/11 - Flight For D Blair - Attendance At Dinner –D Simms And D Blair |
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia |
$2,342.00 |
|
|
Conference - Women In Local Government – Attendee N Nguyen |
|
|
|
2011 Integrated Planning Master Class Registration - Attendee John Paton |
|
|
|
Registration - Customer Service Forum – Attendees K Russell, N Barker & 1 X Tab |
|
|
|
Locker Group P/L |
$212.30 |
|
|
Steel Supplies For Fleet |
|
|
|
Logo Appointments |
$1,375.61 |
|
|
Casual Labour For Rates |
|
|
|
Lyons & Peirce |
$1,381.60 |
|
|
Hire Of Combination Unit & Operator Beach Road & Redcliffe Street - Engineering |
|
|
|
Lyppard |
$532.71 |
|
|
Disinfectant - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
M & K Bailey Accredited Newsagents |
$35.20 |
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Economic Development |
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company |
$6,469.15 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$262.80 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Co. Pty Ltd |
$2,072.40 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Marquee Magic |
$1,094.42 |
|
|
Equipment Hire For Transport And Traffic |
|
|
|
Matrix Productions |
$950.00 |
|
|
Staging Hire - WLCC Events |
|
|
|
Maxine Laurie |
$1,082.00 |
|
|
Transcript Of Interview With Dorothy Darch - Heritage |
|
|
|
Pre-Interview With Rita Leach - Heritage |
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$177,106.44 |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
MBL Food Services |
$408.82 |
|
|
Supplies For Pest Control - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$2,722.50 |
|
|
Valuation Fee - Claim For Compensation Mirrabooka Avenue Extension -Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors |
$18,557.95 |
|
|
Legal Fees – Various For The City |
|
|
|
McLernon's Supply & Demand |
$1,757.60 |
|
|
New Office Desk & Hutch For Training - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
Assembly & Delivery Lockable Cabinet - Programs |
|
|
|
Work Stations And Filing Cabinets - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
McNaughtans Pty Ltd |
$654.28 |
|
|
Welding Supplies For Fleet |
|
|
|
Mechanical Project Services Pty Ltd |
$2,222.09 |
|
|
Call Out/Maintenance - WLCC |
|
|
|
Metrocount |
$372.90 |
|
|
Various Items - Transport & Traffic |
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$426.29 |
|
|
Steel Supplies For Engineering & Fleet |
|
|
|
Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd |
$5,611.32 |
|
|
Pavers For Joondalup Drive - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$22,833.12 |
|
|
Fuel Issues For Fleet |
|
|
|
Minter Ellison Lawyers |
$3,225.58 |
|
|
Heads Of Agreement Extension - City Businesses |
|
|
|
Resource Recovery Facility Guarantee Advice 02/06/2011-28/06/2011 - City Business |
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$43,679.90 |
|
|
Work On Playground Equipment At Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors |
$1,264.85 |
|
|
Various Items For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Modal Pty Ltd |
$297.00 |
|
|
Leading Cultural Change Breakfast With The CEO Of Joondalup Health Campus Kempton Cowan 02/06/2011 – Attendees R Crisp, A Gillespie, J Love |
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd |
$34.65 |
|
|
Jumbo Kids Puzzles For Libraries |
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre |
$360.70 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Move It |
$181.50 |
|
|
Removalist Services For Heritage |
|
|
|
Mr Branko Civich |
$798.25 |
|
|
Massage Sales For April & May 2011 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Ms Oriel Green |
$150.00 |
|
|
Children’s Cultural Activity - NAIDOC Week |
|
|
|
Ms Punita Bimal Mandalia |
$400.00 |
|
|
Art & Craft Classes Held Throughout June 11 - Community Development |
|
|
|
Murdoch Children’s Research Institute |
$280.00 |
|
|
Platform Resource Folders - Heritage |
|
|
|
Mustang Print & Copy |
$374.00 |
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$1,210.00 |
|
|
Plants For Long Beach Park - Parks |
|
|
|
Nespresso Professional |
$1,989.78 |
|
|
Coffee Machine & Coffee Capsules For Councillors Jarrah Lounge - Marketing |
|
|
|
New Internationalist Publications Pty Ltd |
$324.00 |
|
|
Subscription For Libraries |
|
|
|
Noongar Media Enterprises Pty Ltd |
$385.00 |
|
|
Radio Advertising For NAIDOC Celebrations - Wanneroo Library & Cultural Centre |
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$8,294.00 |
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$1,151.20 |
|
|
Various Items - Parks/Fleet |
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$132.00 |
|
|
Fit Windscreen – Plant No. 98398 - Fleet |
|
|
|
Nuford |
$219.65 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
Investment Advisory & Reporting Fee For June 2011 |
|
|
|
Oars Across The Waters Pty Ltd |
$6,216.39 |
|
|
Specialist Psych Services 07/05/2011To 02/06/2011 - HR |
|
|
|
O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd |
$731.83 |
|
|
Windscreen Replacement To WN33232 - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
OCP Sales - Omnific Enterprises P/L |
$246.25 |
|
|
Two-Way Radio Charger - WRC |
|
|
|
Officemax |
$1,908.03 |
|
|
Various Items For IT |
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$143.93 |
|
|
Mobile White Board - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
Opposite Lock |
$515.00 |
|
|
Winch Cable - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
Service Winch - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
Orica Australia P/L |
$2,077.76 |
|
|
Pool Chemicals For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Osborne Park Welding Supplies |
$233.75 |
|
|
Repair Welder - Fleet |
|
|
|
Otto Environment Systems Pty Ltd |
$58,572.80 |
|
|
Lid Pins X 2000 For Bins - Waste Services |
|
|
|
1468 X 240L Bins - Waste |
|
|
|
Pacific Brands |
$1,645.55 |
|
|
Uniforms For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Pallet Pals |
$280.50 |
|
|
Pallets For Engineering |
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries |
$356.40 |
|
|
Wanneroo Recycle Bin Exchange - Information & Business Improvements |
|
|
|
Paper-Go-Round |
$1,430.00 |
|
|
Living And Growing In Wanneroo Cards - Community Links |
|
|
|
Paragon Corporate Training |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
Certificate IV In Government Investigations For R Mansfield - Final Payment |
|
|
|
Parins |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess For WN32103 - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Paul Skerritt Pty Ltd (Joondalup Health Campus) |
$340.00 |
|
|
Medical Fees - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Pax Books |
$1,398.79 |
|
|
Book Purchases - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
Peedac Pty Ltd |
$2,686.20 |
|
|
Catering For Hainsworth Community Centre, Neerabup Primary School and Addison Park Clubrooms |
|
|
|
Personalised Landscape & Design |
$6,501.32 |
|
|
Landscape Services At Various Parks |
|
|
|
Perth Bin Hire |
$21,498.10 |
|
|
Rental Of Compactor & Open Top Bin - June 2011 |
|
|
|
Truck And Driver Hire - WRC |
|
|
|
Perth Convention Bureau |
$313.50 |
|
|
Annual Membership 01/07-30/06/12 - Libraries |
|
|
|
Perth Galleries |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
Valuation Of CoW Art Collections - Community Links |
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd |
$211.64 |
|
|
Vehicle Belts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters |
$920.00 |
|
|
Bus Hire For Social Support Outing - Program Services |
|
|
|
Transport For HACC Social Support Outing 11/07/2011 - Program Services |
|
|
|
Photo Perth Wholesale Pty Ltd |
$1,642.21 |
|
|
Conservation Supplies For Funded Services |
|
|
|
Pink Healthcare Services |
$1,598.80 |
|
|
Hygienic Services For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting |
$763.40 |
|
|
Barrier Gate Inspections For June 2011 - Various Sites - Parks |
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$25,069.76 |
|
|
Plant Propagation For Conservation Services |
|
|
|
Plants For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Playground Solutions |
$805.27 |
|
|
Parts For Parks |
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$406.00 |
|
|
Webcam And Laptop Charger - IT |
|
|
|
Podiatry Services |
$150.00 |
|
|
Domiciliary Podiatry Services - Programs |
|
|
|
Polytechnic West |
$215.95 |
|
|
Text Books - Automotive Mechanics For G Garratt (Fleet) - HR |
|
|
|
Portner Press Pty Ltd |
$77.00 |
|
|
Health & Safety 2011 Update 3 - HR |
|
|
|
Portobello Fresh Food Merchants |
$943.76 |
|
|
Food Items For Alexander & Quinns Day Care Centres |
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$35,251.80 |
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
Printstuf |
$11,993.20 |
|
|
Printing of Various Items for the City - |
|
|
|
Prodesign Lighting Pty Ltd |
$3,040.95 |
|
|
Lighting For Funded Services |
|
|
|
Project Industries |
$6,337.60 |
|
|
Repairs/Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$2,225.17 |
|
|
Various Items - Fire Services/Stores |
|
|
|
PWE Valuations Pty Ltd |
$3,030.00 |
|
|
Valuation Services For Property |
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
Pavement Investigation - Kingsway Sporting Reserve |
|
|
|
Limestone Testing - Joondalup/Cheriton Drive |
|
|
|
ESL Retest - Joondalup/Houghton Drive |
|
|
|
Testing Calcium Caltronate Content - Houghton Drive |
|
|
|
Quantum Multimedia Communications |
$203.18 |
|
|
SMS Charges For Fire Services |
|
|
|
Quinns Podiatry |
$90.00 |
|
|
Consultancy - Program Services |
|
|
|
R E Miles |
$280.00 |
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
RAC Driving Centre |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
Defensive Drive Training For Fire Services Volunteers |
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management |
$2,906.62 |
|
|
Document Retrieval Services - Records |
|
|
|
Records Management Assoc of Aust |
$570.00 |
|
|
Corporate Membership Renewal - Records |
|
|
|
Red Hot Group WA |
$469.24 |
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd |
$47.50 |
|
|
Water For Yanchep & Girrawheen Libraries |
|
|
|
Reliance Petroleum |
$792.57 |
|
|
Kerosene Marked - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
Retech Rubber Pty Ltd |
$93,380.25 |
|
|
Rubber Softfall At Bardsley Park, Barndie Park & Wanneroo Showground |
|
|
|
Richgro |
$39.00 |
|
|
Lawn Mix For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Rightrack |
$465.00 |
|
|
Wheel Alignments For Fleet |
|
|
|
Riot Art & Craft |
$250.66 |
|
|
Art Supplies For School Holiday Program |
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$17,310.15 |
|
|
Road Marking Services For The City |
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia |
$8,571.64 |
|
|
Various Signs & Bollards For The City |
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$27,891.60 |
|
|
Road Works At Various Locations |
|
|
|
Rodriquez Designs |
$278.08 |
|
|
Assorted Tea Towels - Heritage & Museums |
|
|
|
RSEA Pty Ltd |
$333.74 |
|
|
Various Signs For Upgrade To Workshop - Fleet |
|
|
|
Rubek Automatic Doors |
$6,160.00 |
|
|
Sliding Door Repairs At Wanneroo Senior Citizens Centre |
|
|
|
S & C Linemarking |
$1,034.00 |
|
|
Speed Humps For Quinns Rock Bowling Club & Iverell Green Carramar - Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Blacked Out Existing Line - Pinjar Road - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
Safety World |
$2,636.85 |
|
|
Safety Items For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Safeway Contracting |
$935.00 |
|
|
Remove Asbestos - Quinns Caravan Office/Residence |
|
|
|
SAI Global Ltd |
$383.14 |
|
|
Internet Download - Assets Management |
|
|
|
Download - Confined Spaces - Infrastructure Maintenance |
|
|
|
Publication Download - Transport & Traffic |
|
|
|
Sarum Industries Pty Ltd |
$2,293.50 |
|
|
Re-Instate Gate At Wanneroo Football Club - Madeley- Parks |
|
|
|
Remove/Replace Damaged Fencing At Wanneroo Football Club |
|
|
|
Fence Repairs At Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
Fence Repairs At Neville Road - Insurance Services |
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$1,843.21 |
|
|
Lift Services For The City |
|
|
|
Seamless (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$11,917.00 |
|
|
Licences And Support Charges - IT |
|
|
|
Seatbelt Solutions & Aircraft Upholstery Services |
$1,472.00 |
|
|
Various Items - Fleet |
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$3,123.35 |
|
|
Chemical Supply For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$6,380.00 |
|
|
Asbestos Surveys - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports |
$280.50 |
|
|
Stopwatches/Footballs/Bibs For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
SMB Electrical Services |
$112,387.00 |
|
|
Wanneroo Showgrounds - Phase 4, Claim Number 3 |
|
|
|
Solver Paints |
$1,650.53 |
|
|
Paint Supplies - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Sorensen Short & Associates |
$9,069.04 |
|
|
Subdivision Road Widening - Lot 11 Gnangara Road Wangara - Property |
|
|
|
Part Payment - Survey For Lot 5 (3) Lagoon Drive Yanchep - Property |
|
|
|
Part Payment - Survey For Lot 3 Lenore Road Wanneroo - Property |
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions |
$215.60 |
|
|
CD Cases For Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Southern Scene |
$5,108.93 |
|
|
Books For Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$54.18 |
|
|
Security Shredding For The City |
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd |
$720.50 |
|
|
Turf And Soil Testing - Parks |
|
|
|
Sports World of WA |
$1,183.60 |
|
|
Various Items - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$162.66 |
|
|
Various Items - School Holiday Supplies For Youth Services |
|
|
|
Standout Signs |
$6,765.00 |
|
|
Supply And Apply Vehicle Signage To Ford Ranger - Community Patrol |
|
|
|
Remove Decals From Waste Trucks |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$1,548.05 |
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store And Communications & Events |
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$3,168.00 |
|
|
Pump Inspections For Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
Stealth Audio |
$844.00 |
|
|
Supply/Install Reversing Camera System - Fleet |
|
|
|
Remove & Replace Car Kit - Fleet |
|
|
|
Supply & Install Bluetooth Car Kit - Fleet |
|
|
|
Relocate Bluetooth Mic & Answer Button - Fleet |
|
|
|
Stevil Contracting |
$781.00 |
|
|
Modify Side Hoist - Fleet |
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service |
$424.60 |
|
|
Bag Wash - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen In Civic Centre |
|
|
|
Streamline Trust |
$81.60 |
|
|
Newspaper Supplies - Yanchep Library |
|
|
|
Structerre |
$12,100.00 |
|
|
Consultancy Services - Restoration/ Replacement Of The Lookout And Pathway Structures - The Broadview |
|
|
|
Subway Clarkson |
$55.00 |
|
|
Platter For English Conversation Classes At Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
Sun City Publishing Pty Ltd |
$7,250.00 |
|
|
Advertising For June 11 - Communication& Events |
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$790.90 |
|
|
Gutter Brooms - Stores |
|
|
|
Supercrane |
$8,923.20 |
|
|
Upgrade Crane Fall Arrest System On Crane Number 961081- Fleet |
|
|
|
Superior Pak |
$591.80 |
|
|
Galvanised Steel Bin - Waste Services |
|
|
|
Swan Towing Services Pty Ltd |
$2,926.00 |
|
|
Towing Services For Fleet |
|
|
|
Swim Australia |
$356.50 |
|
|
Swim Teacher Training Book - From The Pool's Edge - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Waterproof Paper For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
The Language Centre |
$996.70 |
|
|
Books For Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
The Play Room Educational Toys |
$285.48 |
|
|
Various Items - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$709.50 |
|
|
Various Items For Conservation |
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia WA Branch Inc |
$1,354.75 |
|
|
Term 2 Certificates For Swim School - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Senior First Aid Requalification 21/04/11 Cancellation X 1 - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Wristbands - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
The Watershed Water Systems |
$32,155.78 |
|
|
Reticulation For Parks Maintenance |
|
|
|
Tl Engineering Aust Pty Ltd |
$440.00 |
|
|
Sunvisor For Light Tanker - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$1,178.95 |
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$30,217.00 |
|
|
Landscapes Services At Mirrabooka Avenue |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Trees And Apply Mulch To Various Location - Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Total Road Services |
$59,866.09 |
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
Total Steel of Aust Pty Ltd |
$1,106.60 |
|
|
Steel Supplies For WRC |
|
|
|
Tourism Council Western Australia |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
Membership For City Business |
|
|
|
Treat Time Distributors |
$560.00 |
|
|
Protein Revival Shakes For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd |
$2,002.00 |
|
|
Annual Preventative Maintenance Work - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Monthly Service Carried Out To Pool Filtration System For May 2011 |
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$171,369.44 |
|
|
Install Submersible Pump At Various Parks |
|
|
|
Install Cable & Conduit For New Cubicle Location From Pump Station To Adjacent Lake Marangaroo |
|
|
|
Trover Learning |
$145.74 |
|
|
Materials For Program Services |
|
|
|
TSV Australia Pty Ltd |
$396.00 |
|
|
Transmitter UHF Fitness Audio - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$120,487.93 |
|
|
Turf Works At Various Parks |
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance For June 2011 |
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$334.66 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Ultimate Drainage |
$104,430.63 |
|
|
Construct & Install Sewer Main Extension, House Drain & Water Corporation Fees For Quinns Sports Club - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
United Equipment |
$478.71 |
|
|
Pump Service For Fleet |
|
|
|
Universal Coatings WA |
$1,980.00 |
|
|
Wagon Restoration - Museum And Heritage |
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$563.42 |
|
|
Repair Handset - Fleet |
|
|
|
Install Two Way - Fleet |
|
|
|
Visual Inspirations Pty Ltd |
$1,140.70 |
|
|
Equipment Hire For Marketing |
|
|
|
VLI Conveyors Pty Ltd |
$5,166.70 |
|
|
Chevron Belt - WRC |
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors |
$4,956.60 |
|
|
Works At Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$265.10 |
|
|
Registration For New Hino 300 Series WN33317 |
|
|
|
WA Kerbing |
$19,506.46 |
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath - Houghton & Joondalup Drive - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
Lay Kerbing/Footpath At Ashby Depot Carpark |
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$1,659.50 |
|
|
Stationery Items For Library Services |
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc |
$77.00 |
|
|
WALGA Breakfast 06/07/2011 - Attendee J Stenhouse - Finance |
|
|
|
WA Rangers Association Inc |
$470.00 |
|
|
Registration 2011 Professional Development Training Conference 22-23 September - Attendeer C Arnold |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$1,373.22 |
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Inc |
$738.00 |
|
|
Table For 10 For Trivia Night Auction Dinner 2011 - Elected Members |
|
|
|
Business Breakfast 01/06/11 Clients For Life With Social Media - Cr Treby |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators |
$4,619.46 |
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$385.50 |
|
|
Reimbursement For Annual Web Hosting - Fire Services |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$44,926.89 |
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Glass |
$537.90 |
|
|
Supply/Fit Mirror To Lift - WLCC |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Hardware |
$1,443.60 |
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Various Departments |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$34,344.21 |
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Smash Repairs Pty Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
Insurance Excess On WN32993 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$1,293.60 |
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$664.50 |
|
|
Name Badges For Various Employees |
|
|
|
Trophy Golden Boot For Men’s Soccer - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
Trophy - Gold Bowl On Star Riser - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
Water Dynamics |
$20,738.41 |
|
|
Installation Of Controllers - Amery Park |
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$4,104.56 |
|
|
Nurses For Immunisation Clinic - Health |
|
|
|
West Coast Institute of Training |
$4,114.00 |
|
|
Workshop In EEO Legislation & Bullying - Human Resources |
|
|
|
Sponsorship Of The West Coast Innovation (Employee) Award For The 2011 Awards Evening |
|
|
|
West Coast School of Art |
$405.00 |
|
|
Art Classes For Wanneroo Recreation Centre |
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$911.73 |
|
|
Book Purchases For Library Services |
|
|
|
Westcare Industries |
$242.11 |
|
|
Address Labels For Library Services |
|
|
|
Westrac |
$351.22 |
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$129.80 |
|
|
Cash Collection For Customer Services |
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd |
$17,517.34 |
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
Whites Wires Australia Pty Ltd |
$28,160.00 |
|
|
Bailing Wire For WRC |
|
|
|
Wilsons Sign Solutions |
$264.00 |
|
|
Door Decal - Libraries |
|
|
|
WJ & A Gordon Low Loader Services |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
Transport Services For Fleet |
|
|
|
Woodhouse Legal |
$462.00 |
|
|
Legal Fees - Yanchep Coastal Pathway - Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Wooldridges |
$77.40 |
|
|
Craft Items For Education Program |
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$2,054.25 |
|
|
Staff Uniforms For Various Employees |
|
|
|
Workforce Solutions Pty Ltd |
$1,891.95 |
|
|
ASPEC Administration 2011/2012 - Projects |
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$1,296.00 |
|
|
Printing Bin Stickers - City Business |
|
|
|
Printing Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
Printing Full Colour Prints - Community Development |
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$17.32 |
|
|
Oil Waste Disposal For WRC |
|
|
|
Wurths Australia Pty Ltd |
$298.88 |
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
Xpress Magazine |
$737.00 |
|
|
Advertising For Marketing |
|
|
|
Youth Affairs Council of WA |
$550.00 |
|
|
Membership Subscription For Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
|
00001336 |
25/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
DME Contractors |
$17,438.50 |
|
|
Progress Claim And Retention Release - Swanley Park - Projects |
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.) |
$37,760.15 |
|
|
Site Services At Butler - Parks |
|
|
|
Frogmat Environmental (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$52,587.58 |
|
|
Progress Claim For Old Trafford Park June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
00001337 |
26/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$3,633.52 |
|
|
Casual Labour - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd |
$4,341.76 |
|
|
Casual Labour - Parks |
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$204,291.49 |
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$44,226.74 |
|
|
Cleaning Services For Period 01/07/11 - 15/07/11 |
|
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd |
$1,140,056.59 |
|
|
Progress Claim 3 - Ocean Reef Road Extension Stage 2 - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
00001338 |
26/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$247.20 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$753.20 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$345,472.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch |
$48.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,814.73 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$2,754.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$3,248.00 |
|
|
Contribution Towards Social Club Function 23/07/2011 - Kalamunda Youth Swing Band |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$269.50 |
|
|
Monthly Allowance - Paid Weekly (July Payment & Payment Missed From June) |
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$1,928.55 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking |
$550.00 |
|
|
Insurance - Uninsured Stallholders At Wanneroo Art N About Market 31/07/2011 - Marketing |
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,262.00 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Main Roads WA |
$90,687.54 |
|
|
Installation Signs & Pavement Markings - Hepburn Avenue Alexander Heights - Projects |
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$6,417.97 |
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$150.44 |
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
Western Power |
$2,723.01 |
|
|
Connolly Drive Streetlighting - Infrastructure Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
00001339 |
28/07/2011 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Muni |
|
|
|
Bank Reconciliation July 2011 $26,143.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$9,469,681.32 |
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
83122 |
24/05/2011 |
N Anthony |
-$700.00 |
83469 |
21/06/2011 |
Karen Gilmore |
-$6.00 |
76089 |
10/11/2009 |
Candlewood Dental Centre |
-$300.00 |
83117 |
24/05/2011 |
Essentail First Choice Homes |
-$1,098.87 |
83266 |
07/06/2011 |
Sharlee Momsen |
-$153.08 |
83547 |
28/06/2011 |
M Anthony |
-$700.00 |
83354 |
14/06/2011 |
M Adams |
-$450.00 |
82942 |
10/05/2011 |
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club |
-$700.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
-$4,107.95 |
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
Cell 1 |
|
|
|
Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd - Infrastructure Contributions Lots 501 Contil Road, 9603 & 9604 Pinjar Road |
$222,703.20 |
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
Keith Howard Piper - Survey Lenore Road For Widening |
$2,944.00 |
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$604.81 |
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$2,390.35 |
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$944.45 |
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$4,376.36 |
|
|
Minter Ellison Trust - Mirrabooka Avenue Land Acquisition |
$773,568.26 |
|
|
Nastech WA Pty Ltd - Survey 70 Leach Way Gnangara |
$1,966.50 |
|
|
Cell 6 |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$944.45 |
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Claim For Compensation |
$4,375.62 |
|
|
Minter Ellison Trust - Mirrabooka Avenue Land Acquisition |
$145,356.00 |
|
|
TPS Capital Contribution to Capital Project PR-1382 |
$773,568.25 |
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
PWE Valuations Pty Ltd - Property Valuation Services 359 Gnangara Road |
$2,754.54 |
|
|
Brian Zucal & Associates - Compensation Valuation Lot 6 Gnangara Road |
$6,000.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
$1,942,496.80 |
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account |
|||
|
|
Payroll Payments July 2011: |
|
|
|
04/07/2011 |
$571.07 |
|
|
12/07/2011 |
$1,293,385.03 |
|
|
14/07/2011 |
$988.59 |
|
|
18/07/2011 |
$10,452.77 |
|
|
26/07/2011 |
$1,281,525.40 |
|
|
28/07/2011 |
$500.00 |
|
|
29/07/2011 |
$1,373.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total |
$2,588,795.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees June 2011 EFT 1339 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$2,276.77 |
|
|
CBA Pos Fee |
$229.61 |
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$300.00 |
|
|
Line Fee |
$208.30 |
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$524.91 |
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$597.83 |
|
|
Bpay Fees Rates |
$2,299.38 |
|
|
Bpay Fees Debtors |
$406.14 |
|
|
Bpoint Fees Rates |
$185.44 |
|
|
Bpoint Fees Debtors |
$49.89 |
|
|
Aquamotion Direct Debit Return Fees |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees |
$7,128.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments June 2011: |
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
|
Items For In-house Catering June 11 |
$1,821.82 |
|
|
Bereavement Notice |
$76.01 |
|
|
Bereavement Gift |
$91.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Caple |
|
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$165.00 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$50.80 |
|
|
Conference Registration |
$504.00 |
|
|
Parking Expenses |
$36.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Bentley |
|
|
|
Conference Airfares |
$1,064.70 |
|
|
Hospitality |
$211.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Blair |
|
|
|
Training Course V Bappoo |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Paton |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$44.88 |
|
|
Refund - Course Cancellation D Cox |
-$66.00 |
|
|
Conference Expenses Cr I Goodenough |
$1,297.00 |
|
|
Conference Expenses Cr D Newton |
$1,931.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Kosova |
|
|
|
Conference Registration - P Thompson |
$215.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms |
|
|
|
Conference Expenses |
$119.36 |
|
|
Conference Registration |
$125.00 |
|
|
Hospitality Expenses |
$153.50 |
|
|
Parking Fees |
$46.16 |
|
|
Conference Accommodation |
$1,122.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing Officer |
|
|
|
Staff Amenities |
$20.03 |
|
|
Conference Registration W Crawford |
$1,113.75 |
|
|
OHS Legal Guide Online Licence |
$814.00 |
|
|
OHS Manager Online Licence |
$986.00 |
|
|
Publication Purchase - IT |
$61.89 |
|
|
Software Purchase - Fire Services |
$1,122.00 |
|
|
CoW Safety Representative Course |
$4,477.00 |
|
|
SIWA Membership Subscription |
$1,200.00 |
|
|
Conference Registration - K Ng |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments July 2011 |
$19,015.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque July 2011 |
$8,639,516.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$8,665,659.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$11,254,455.82 |
Attachments: Nil
File Ref: 5509 – 11/81342
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement (Estimate) for the period ended 30 June 2011.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration has opted to present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and in a similar format to that presented in the 2010/2011 Annual Budget. This format separates Revenue and Expenses from Other Revenue and Expenses and provides improved disclosure of the City’s underlying Operating Result.
The Financial Activity Statement is in the form of an Income Statement, which compares year to date actual income and expenses with the year to date budget, shows variances and the adopted and revised budgets (if any). Revised budget figures are inclusive of endorsed amendments from Council (including the Mid Year Budget Review). It is accompanied by a Balance Sheet together with information relating to Capital Projects, an Investment Portfolio Summary, Statement of Net Current Assets and Rate Setting Statement.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2010/2011 financial year Council has adopted 10% for the reporting of variances, which is in line with previous years.
In accordance with Regulation 33A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, a local government is to carry out a review of its Annual Budget for that year between 1 January and 31 March in each year. Hence, the 2010/11 Mid Year Budget Review was considered and adopted by Council at its meeting of 8 March 2011, with financial information subsequently updated and reflected under the Revised Budget figures.
Detail
The Financial Activity Statement (Estimate) and June year to date financial performances of the City are detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The figures presented represent an estimate of the end of year results. Final results for the full year may vary and are subject to the audit confirmation from the City’s external auditor Grant Thornton Australia Limited.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the commentaries on 10% variances to revised budgets in the Financial Activity Statement (Estimate) for the period ended 30 June 2011 are provided below:
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Net Result $ million
Year to Date Actual (Estimate) 65.545
Year to Date Revised Budget 54.126
Year to Date Variance 11.419 (+21%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 33.062
Full Year Revised Budget 54.126
The following information is provided on key aspects of the year to date financial results:
Revenues $ million
Year to Date Actual (Estimate) 129.241
Year to Date Revised Budget 125.187
Year to Date Variance 4.054 (+3%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 121.694
Full Year Revised Budget 125.187
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
As per previous years, the City has received an early payment from the Grants Commission of its first quarterly instalment for 2011/2012, for $1.306 million. This is the main contributor towards the positive variance to revised budget of $1.831 million (+20%).
Interest Earnings
For the financial year to date ending June, Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index benchmark by 0.92% pa (5.90% pa vs. 4.98 % pa). June year to date interest earnings amounts to $8.086 million reflecting a substantial favourable variance of $0.984 million (+14%) compare to year-to date revised budget.
Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) at its recent meeting held on 2 August decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 4.75 per cent, with the following statement:
“At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 4.75 per cent.
The global economy is continuing its expansion, but the pace of growth slowed in the June quarter. The supply-chain disruptions from the Japanese earthquake and the dampening effects of high commodity prices on income and spending in major countries both contributed to the slowing. It is still not clear how persistent this slower growth will be. The supply-chain disruptions are now gradually abating and commodity prices have softened of late, though they generally remain high. In China most indications suggest only a mild slowdown so far.
The central scenario for the world economy over the next couple of years envisaged by most forecasters remains one of growth below the pace of 2010, but at or above long-term averages. Downside risks have increased, however, as concerns have grown over the outlook for the public finances of both Europe and the United States.
Australia's terms of trade are now at very high levels and national income has been growing strongly. Investment in the resources sector is picking up very strongly and some related service sectors are enjoying better than average conditions. But in other sectors, cautious behaviour by households and the high level of the exchange rate are having a noticeable dampening effect. The impetus from earlier Australian Government spending programs is now also abating, as had been intended.
The resumption of coal production continues, but a full recovery of flood-affected production now looks unlikely before early next year. Precautionary behaviour by households also looks likely to keep some areas of demand weaker in the near term than earlier expected. Overall, growth in real GDP through 2011 is now likely to be at about trend. Over the medium term, overall growth is still likely to be at trend or higher, unless the world economy deteriorates noticeably.
Growth in employment has moderated and the unemployment rate has been little changed, near 5 per cent, for some time now. Reports of skills shortages remain confined, at this point, to the resources and related sectors. After the significant decline in 2009, growth in wages has returned to rates seen prior to the downturn, though productivity growth remains weak.
Year-ended CPI inflation has been high, affected by the extreme weather events earlier in the year. As these effects reverse over the next couple of quarters, CPI inflation should decline. But measures that give a better indication of the trend in inflation have begun to rise over the past six months, after declining for the previous two years. While they have, to date, remained consistent with the 2–3 per cent target on a year-ended basis, the Board remains concerned about the medium-term outlook for inflation.
It is appropriate under such circumstances for monetary policy to exert a degree of restraint. Most financial indicators suggest that it has been doing so, as a result of the Board's decisions last year. Credit growth has declined over recent months and is very subdued by historical standards, even with evidence of greater willingness to lend. Most asset prices, including housing prices, have also softened over recent months. The exchange rate is high. Each of these variables is affected by other factors as well, but together they point to financial conditions being tighter than normal.
At today's meeting, the Board considered whether the recent information warranted further policy tightening. On balance, the Board judged that it was prudent to maintain the current setting of monetary policy, particularly in view of the acute sense of uncertainty in global financial markets over recent weeks. In future meetings, the Board will continue to assess carefully the evolving outlook for growth and inflation.”
The City continued with a “cautiously optimistic” prudent investment strategy throughout the year and projected a full year forecast of $7.902 million, which was $1.720 million (+32%) better than the Adopted Budget and $0.800 million better than Revised Budget. The estimated actual, however, exceeds the forecast by $0.184 million.
Other Revenue
The Other Revenue category shows a favourable year to date variance to revised budget of $1.092 million (+26%), mainly due to the better than expected sales of commodity products at the Wangara Recycling Facility. The income from this facility contributes towards the majority of the variance in this category.
To further explain this impact it is noted that the value of commodities is continuing to rise, through the further strengthening Australian dollar and the world market paying more for products such as newspaper and mixed plastic. Increases in volume and processing has produced higher income from sales of commodity products, which exceeded the full year forecast. A forecast improvement above revised budget for Other Revenue of $0.900 million was identified however the results achieved have exceeded this by approximately another $0.200 million, which is $2.127 million over the adopted budget.
Expenses $ million
Year to Date Actual (Estimate) 119.511
Year to Date Revised Budget 122.499
Year to Date Variance 2.988 (+2%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 123.713
Full Year Revised Budget 122.499
Expenses - Overall Comment
Under Expenses, there were no categories exceeding a variance of 10% to revised budget for the end of June, hence no specific commentaries are noted per the requirements of Local Government (Financial Management) Regulation 34(5). Administration are, however, pleased to report that each expense category is indicating positive end of year variances of between 0 and 6% based on the current estimate figures recorded, as an outcome of the ongoing efforts of staff and management.
Other Revenue and Expenses $ million
(Excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Revenue in excess of expenses:
Year to Date Actual (Estimate) 28.382
Year to Date Revised Budget 21.438
Year to Date Variance 6.944 (+32%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 5.080
Full Year Revised Budget 21.438
Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Expenses
With TPS Expenses, costs have been recorded year to date, which are $4.789 million (+52%) below Revised Budget. These expenditures relate to specific costs and land purchases within the Scheme location, which can only be allocated for particular Scheme purposes and where unspent, will be carried forward to future years.
During the mid year review process, it was noted that work progress in various scheme locations is substantially slower than anticipated hence the full year expenses Budget was revised down to $9.225 million.
Loss on Asset Disposals
The Loss on Asset Disposals relates directly to the turnover of plant and fleet items. Plant and fleet activities within this area did steadily progress into June. Comparing to year to date revised budget, a variance of +$0.732 million (+82%) is reflected for Losses on Asset Disposals.
Contributions of Physical Assets $ million
Year to Date Actual (Estimate) 27.433
Year to Date Budget 30.000
Year to Date Variance -2.567 (-9%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 30.000
Full Year Revised Budget 30.000
Each year Developers hand over physical assets (such as parklands) to the City, for its ongoing management and control. These assets can be of considerable value and will be calculated and booked to the accounts during the preparation of end of year Financial Statements. It should be noted that variations on the amounts of contributions of physical assets comparing to budget has no direct impact to the City’s current financial year financial results. Based on current data received by the City a value of $27.433 million has been recorded, which is -9% lower than initial budget estimates.
Balance Sheet (Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program as of 30 June 2011 is summarised below, by Program Category: -
Capital Works Detail By Program
Program Category Description |
Annual Revised Budget $ million |
Year to date Actual (Est.) $ million |
Commitments $ million |
Estimated Carry Forward $ million |
Community |
2.969 |
1.314 |
0.405 |
1.318 |
Corporate |
7.208 |
4.704 |
0.784 |
1.248 |
Drainage |
0.544 |
0.375 |
0.093 |
0.255 |
Investment |
4.438 |
0.758 |
0.000 |
1.385 |
Recreation and Sport |
16.486 |
11.713 |
0.676 |
3.558 |
Transport |
48.338 |
23.244 |
8.626 |
24.750 |
Waste Management |
3.282 |
1.113 |
0.169 |
1.530 |
Total |
83.265 |
43.221 |
10.753 |
34.044 |
The table above notes a total Annual Revised Budget for the Capital Works Program as $83.265 million. This figure is inclusive of all adjustments to the Original Adopted Budget as endorsed by Council (including the Mid Year Budget Review). Where necessary some adjustments have been made to categories, however this will have no effect on the bottom line.
As at the end of June $43.221 million has been spent against capital works which equates to 52% of the program. In addition to the actual expenditure, $10.753 million is recognised as committed to future financial years. Furthermore, additional adjustments will be processed for June in relation to end of year finalisation per audit requirements (Note: Commitments are life to date and may relate to future financial periods).
Due to various issues outside of the City’s control, some projects were required to be carried forward to 2011/2012. After meeting with all Responsible Officers for projects in May to assess their year to date status and end of year forecasts, an amount of $34.044 million was identified to carry forward (listed in the table above).
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information above, key projects are selected to be reported on, on a regular basis, which are listed in the following table:
Capital Works Details For Selected Projects
Project Description |
Annual RevisedBudget $ million |
Year to Date Actual (Est.) $ million |
Commitments $ million |
Estimated Carry Forward $ million |
Status Comment |
Ocean Reef Road Wangara |
12.986 |
0.766 |
9.216 |
11.000 |
Stage 2 construction commenced early April 2011, with earthworks at the Alexander Drive end of the project. |
Pinjar Road Ashby |
8.019 |
4.221 |
0.764 |
2.519 |
In progress. Working on northern end of the works. |
Flynn Drive Neerabup |
6.226 |
0.003 |
0.000 |
6.216 |
Subject to land acquisition and environmental approval. To be carried forward to 2011/2012. |
Mirrabooka Avenue Landsdale |
4.5000 |
4.214 |
0.422 |
0.000 |
Completed and open to traffic during April 2011. |
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex |
4.000 |
3.598 |
0.737 |
0.000 |
Completed April 2011. |
Neerabup Industrial Estate |
3.250 |
0.396 |
0.017 |
0.318 |
Delayed due to environmental issues. Resulting in some works needing to be carried forward to 2011/2012. |
Hepburn Avenue Alexander Heights |
3.500 |
2.753 |
0.081 |
0.600 |
Dualling of Hepburn Avenue from Alexander Drive to Mirrabooka Avenue completed and opened to traffic during April 2011, with design for the remaining section from Mirrabooka Avenue to Bellerive Boulevard underway. |
Light Plant Replacement |
3.167 |
0.889 |
0.262 |
0.367 |
In progress. |
Waste Management Plant Replacement |
1.542 |
0.787 |
0.103 |
0.467 |
In progress. Project reduced due to unsuccessful Joondalup tender. |
Kingsway Netball Facilities |
1.793 |
1.357 |
0.351 |
0.000 |
Western netball court upgrade works completed with landscape upgrade in progress. |
Joondalup Drive Pedestrian Improvements Banksia Grove |
1.728 |
1.695 |
0.031 |
0.079 |
Road upgrade works completed during April 2011, with landscape upgrade in progress. |
Lenore Road Realignment Wanneroo |
1.250 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
1.250 |
To be carried forward to 2011/2012 due to delay in land availability. |
New Vehicle Purchases |
0.520 |
0.321 |
0.010 |
0.184 |
In progress. Project reduced due to unsuccessful Joondalup tender. |
Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubrooms |
1.500 |
1.518 |
0.177 |
0.000 |
Nearing completion. |
Joondalup Drive Carramar |
2.094 |
0.493 |
0.347 |
1.094 |
In progress with state government funding brought forward to fast track works. |
In relation to the reporting of completed projects, Attachment 5 lists all individual projects with a variance in excess of +/-10%. Details of their revised budgets, final (estimate) expenditures and relevant comments from responsible officers are noted.
Investment Portfolio Summary (Refer to Attachment 3)
In accordance with the review of the City’s Investment Policy at Council meeting held on 14 December 2010 (CS03-12/10), Council endorsed the City to continue maintaining a “cautiously optimistic” approach to its investments to ensure full protection of the City’s financial assets. As such, the City will only invest in government guaranteed products or short to medium term deposits with major banks during the present economic climate.
As at 30 June 2011, the City holds an investment portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $183.530 million. Interest Earnings were budgeted at 5% yield. For the financial year to date ending June, Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index benchmark by 0.92% pa (5.90% pa vs. 4.98% pa). Further explanation of the current economic climate, market conditions and City’s portfolio analysis is detailed in Attachment 3.
Rate Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4 represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
Overall Comment
Council adopted the City’s Mid Year Budget Review at its 8 March 2011 meeting and accordingly, the resulting Budget amendments required for Operating and Non Operating as well as Capital Works Program, are now incorporated into the financials, which are reflected as the “Revised Budget”, together with any other changes endorsed by Council.
The Operating Result for the City to June month end presents an overall favourable variance of +262% (+$7.042 million) to year to date revised budget. Operating income continued to be ahead of year to date revised budget by 3% ($4.054 million), with a majority of the variance resulting from Interest Earnings (+$0.984 million/+14%) and Other Revenue (+$1.092 million/+26%) particularly the Commodity Sales from the Wangara Recycling Facility. As per previous years, the City has received an early payment from the Grants Commission of its first quarterly instalment for 2011/2012, for $1.306 million. Expenditures from operations also present a favourable variance to year to date revised budget of +2% (+$2.988 million). Activities in the capital program have progressed as expected with year to date expenditures of $43.221 million incurred with an additional $10.753 million reflected as Commitments.
Further to the encouraging financial data presented in the recent Mid Year Budget Review, Administration was confident of delivering improved financial results for the year ended 30 June 2011. With particular attention directed to the close monitoring of financial data during June, reported end of year figures have indeed provided the organisation with a positive platform for moving into the 2011/2012 financial year.
It is extremely encouraging to note the improvement achieved in the result from operations, from a deficit of $2.018 million (adopted budget) to a surplus of $9.729 million (estimated end of year actual). Whilst positive outcomes to revised budget were made across all categories, material figures to note under Revenues were: within Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions ($1.830 million/+20%) and under Expenses were: Materials & Contracts ($1.659 million/+4%).
Upon the completion of the external audit in the coming months, the final figures for the end of financial year will be subsequently reported to Council, which may differ to those reported above due to audit adjustments.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statements (Estimate) and commentaries on variances to Revised Budget for the period ended 30 June 2011, consisting of:
· Annual Original and Revised Budgets,
· Revised Budget figures being inclusive of results of the Mid Year Budget Review,
· June 2011 Year to Date Revised Budget,
· June 2011 Year to Date Income and Expenditure Estimates,
· June 2011 Year to Date Material Variance Notes, and
· June 2011 Year to Date Net Current Assets Estimates.
Attachments:
1. |
Income Statement for the Period ended 30 June 2011 |
11/88223 |
Minuted |
2. |
Balance Sheet for the Period ended 30 June 2011 |
11/88227 |
Minuted |
3. |
Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary |
11/88228 |
|
4. |
Rate setting Statement for the period ended 30 June 2011 |
11/88231 |
Minuted |
5. |
Capital works details for completed projects |
11/88237 |
Minuted |
Governance and Executive Services
File Ref: 2855 – 11/85273
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy requires that applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the City’s Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual with no capped amount.
Detail
During this period, the City has received three sponsorship requests, nil community donation requests and one request for a waiver of fees and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
Applicant 1 – ECU Joondalup Soccer Club |
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Joseph Middleton, Michael Kirkby, Samuel Pollard, Samuel Fitzsimmons and Ashwin Jayakumar |
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
Event Details |
Volkswagen Junior Masters Australia, Sydney NSW, 1 – 2 October 2011 |
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (National) |
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for National events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team). |
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to ECU Joondalup Soccer Club for the participation of Joseph Middleton; Michael Kirkby; Samuel Pollard; Samuel Fitzsimmons; and Ashwin Jayakumar in the Volkswagen Junior Masters Australia to be held in Sydney NSW from 1 – 2 October 2011. |
Applicant 2 – Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit (Under 14’s) |
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Joshua Gethin, Dominic Cronin and Ashley Beckett |
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
Event Details |
Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U14’s |
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (National) |
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for National events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team). This group were sponsored by the City to the same event held in April 2009. |
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit for the participation of Joshua Gethin, Dominic Cronin and Ashley Beckett in the Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U14’s to be held in Myunda Bay NSW from 4 – 7 October 2011. |
Applicant 3 – Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit (Under 16’s) |
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Luke Dart, Greg Napier, Caitlin Richardson and Tayla Cole |
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
Event Details |
Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U16’s |
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (National) |
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for National events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team). This group were sponsored by the City to the same event held in April 2009. |
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit for the participation of Luke Dart, Greg Napier, Caitlin Richardson and Tayla Cole in the Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U16’s to be held in Myunda Bay NSW from 4 – 7 October 2011. |
Community Group Donations
Applicant 1 – Country Women’s Association (CWA) Wanneroo |
|
Request amount |
$640.00 |
Description of request |
100% Waiver of Fees and bond at the Gallery, Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre (WLCC) on 12 June 2012 for a Breast Cancer Care WA Morning Tea. |
Criteria |
Evaluation |
Potential for income generation |
Gold coin donation |
Status of applicant organisation |
Not for Profit - Proceeds go to Breast Cancer Care WA |
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Open to all in the Community |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
This request supports Objective 2.2 of Council’s Strategic Plan being “Improve the City’s identity and community wellbeing through arts, culture, leisure and recreation.” |
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Nil |
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
In kind - volunteers |
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Nil |
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
Comments |
Under the Facility Hire and Use Policy this group would receive free use of a City facility but as the Gallery at the WLCC is not covered by this policy, a bond of $400 and a community rate of $240 is prescribed as the standard fee. The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy does not support the waiver of the bond and will only support a 50% waiver of fees. |
Recommendation |
APPROVE a 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $120.00 to CWA Wanneroo to hold a Breast Cancer Care WA Morning Tea at the Gallery, WLCC on 12 June 2012. |
Reason |
The request satisfies part of the criteria of the policy. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
The City of Wanneroo Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team and Regional or State capped at $600 per club.
Financial Implications
Budget 2011/2012 |
|
$80 000.00 |
Amount expended to date (as at 15 August 2011) |
|
$11,550.00 |
Balance |
|
$68,450.00 |
Total of requests for this round: Donations (in this report):
Total this Round |
$1,920.00 |
$1,920.00 |
CARRY FORWARD |
|
$66,530.00 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to ECU Joondalup Soccer Club for the participation of Joseph Middleton, Michael Kirkby, Samuel Pollard, Samuel Fitzsimmons and Ashwin Jayakumar in the Volkswagen Junior Masters Australia to be held in Sydney NSW from 1 – 2 October 2011;
2. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit for the participation of Joshua Gethin, Dominic Cronin and Ashley Beckett in the Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U14’s to be held in Myunda Bay NSW from 4 – 7 October 2011;
3. APPROVES a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade Cadet Unit for the participation of Luke Dart, Greg Napier, Caitlin Richardson and Tayla Cole in the Australasian National Fire Cadet Championships U16’s to be held in Myunda Bay NSW from 4 – 7 October 2011; and
4. APPROVES a 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $120.00 to CWA Wanneroo to hold a Breast Cancer Care WA Morning Tea at the Gallery, WLCC on 12 June 2012.
Attachments: Nil
Property
File Ref: 3679 – 11/79808
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider dedicating the whole of Lot 102 (143) Kingsway, Madeley as road reserve.
Background
In January 2005 the City acquired Lot 102 (143) Kingsway, Madeley (Attachment 1 refers) from Caversham Property Pty Ltd for the purpose of extending Hartman Drive. The road works have been completed and the lot has remained in freehold ownership by the City and is required to be dedicated as road reserve.
Detail
Lot 102 was acquired for part of the Hartman Drive Extension Project. Hartman Drive was extended from its current intersection with Hepburn Avenue through to Gnangara Road to accommodate high demand raised by the rapid development in the area. The project commenced as part of the City’s 2009-2010 Capital Works Budget. As the construction of Hartman Drive is now complete, it is necessary to finalise the road dedication.
Where land held in “fee simple” ownership is required as road reserve, it can be dedicated in accordance with the requirement of the Land Administration Act 1997 (LAA). The landowner must request the Minister for Lands to dedicate the land as road reserve, transfer the land to the Crown and indemnify the Minister for Lands (the Minister) against any claim that may arise from the dedication.
Comment
As Lot 102 (143) Kingsway, Madeley is held by the City in “fee simple” and is required as road reserve for the Hartman Drive extension, it is appropriate for the City to request its dedication as road reserve.
Statutory Compliance
The ability to dedicate the whole of Lot 102 as road reserve is authorised by the provisions of the LAA.
Section 56 of the LAA provides that where a local government requests the Minister to dedicate land as a road it is to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation that may arise from that action.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.5 Improve transport options and connections”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the dedication of the whole of Lot 102 (143) Kingsway, Madeley as shown on Deposited Plan 36095 as a road under section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997;
2 AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer and Mayor to affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Transfer of Land and any other associated documentation relating to the dedication of Lot 102 (143) Kingsway, Madeley as road reserve; and
3. INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands against any claim for compensation arising from the dedication.
Attachments:
1. |
Overview Lot 102 (143) Kingsway - Hartman Dedication |
11/87833 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 381
File Ref: 3980 – 11/81302
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a lease to Wanneroo Community Men’s Shed (Inc) (WCMS) at Daisy House, Girrawheen.
Background
Daisy House is situated on part of Lot 1, Wade Court, Girrawheen owned freehold by the City under Certificate of Title Volume 1993 Folio 65. The building is currently vacant and was previously occupied by Anglicare WA (Inc) until 23 December 2010 under a lease arrangement with the City.
WCMS is a not-for-profit charitable organisation and was formed as a place for men to come together in the community for camaraderie, to chat with other men about problems, issues and life in general and to participate in hands on projects. It currently hires a room within the Hainsworth Community Centre two days a week and has an active group of a minimum of 25 members. Since its incorporation in March 2010 WCMS has expanded rapidly and has now outgrown the premises it currently uses.
WCMS wrote to the City in April 2011 to register its interest to lease Daisy House and a vacant portion of the land immediately adjacent to it being a total area of approximately 1,250m² (Attachment 1 refers) for its operations as it considers this facility as ideal for its future growth.
WCMS currently obtains its revenue from refurbishing and repairing old computers and providing them to people in the community who are in need, who do not currently own a computer, or for financial reasons are unable to afford computer equipment.
As at May 2011 WCMS lists some of its achievements as follows:-
· Supplied over 200 computers to needy groups and individuals
· Appointed as a Microsoft Registered Refurbisher
· Registered as a not for profit, incorporated, charitable organisation
· Agreement with Anglicare to provide handyman sessions for African migrants
· Established links with migrant groups such as the Multicultural Services Centre of WA Inc to assist individuals integrate into Australia
· Donated six computers to Clarkson Youth Centre and provides their ongoing support
· Mentors individuals who are Disability Services’ clients
Detail
WCMS considers that Daisy House, being a larger premises, will allow it to expand its projects to include:-
· Drop in area for men who just need to mix with other men
· Cooking lessons and demonstrations
· Information sessions for men’s health issues
· Wood and metal working projects
· Vegetable garden
· Any other worthwhile community projects as and when they arise
In addition WCMS has advised that it is seeking Lotterywest funding to upgrade Daisy House to a standard suitable to conduct future projects. Lotterywest has advised WCMS that, in order for WCMS to qualify to submit a once off funding application to Lotterywest, it needs to have secured a minimum lease term of 3 years.
It is understood that the funding application to Lotterywest will be a once off application for the purpose of carrying out improvements/fitout to Daisy House and will not be used for the ongoing day to day operational expenses. On that basis WCMS would be categorised as ‘Not for Profit’ under the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Administration has been in negotiations with WCMS since it registered its interest in Daisy House and a formal lease proposal was presented on 13 July 2011.
It is proposed that a three year term with a two year option is appropriate, subject to Council approval, on the following essential terms:-
Lease Term |
Three (3) years plus a two (2) year option |
Commencement Date |
1 September 2011 |
Lease Rental |
$1.00 per annum |
Rates, Taxes and Assessments* |
Lessee responsibility for water rates |
Emergency Services Levy |
Lessee responsibility |
Outgoings (water, electricity, gas, telephone etc.) |
Lessee responsibility |
Building Insurance |
Lessee responsibility – to be insured under City’s policy and premium recovered. |
Building maintenance and cleaning |
Lessee responsibility |
Statutory Compliance |
Lessee responsibility |
*Note: WCMS proposed usage of Daisy House will be for charitable purposes and is therefore exempt from paying Council rates.
WCMS has agreed to the above essential terms.
Comment
WCMS provides a range of services to the local community, in particular its unique service to the local male community as described in this report.
Given WCMS requirement to secure a minimum lease term of 3 years, Administration recommends that the proposed lease to WCMS, as outlined in this report, be supported. The further option period on offer will provide WCMS the flexibility to extend the lease should it have established itself during the initial term of the lease.
Administration has no immediate plans to develop or dispose of the land.
Statutory Compliance
Given the activities of WCMS and its registration as a not for profit charitable organisation, it is considered that the lease would be an exempt disposition under Regulation 30(2)(b) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 which states:-
“30(2) A disposition of land is an exempt disposition if-
(b) the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not –
(i) the objects of which are charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational, sporting or other like nature; and
(ii) the members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit from the body’s transactions;’
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.3 Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other”
“4 Governance
4.1 Improve strategic partnerships”
Policy Implications
Lease negotiations have been conducted generally in accordance with the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Financial Implications
The lease has been negotiated on a ‘no cost to the City’ basis and will result in the recoup of such costs as building insurance and water rates.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the leasing of a 1,250m² (approx) portion of Lot 1, Wade Court, Girrawheen including ‘Daisy House’ to Wanneroo Community Men’s Shed (Inc) for a term of three (3) years commencing 1 September 2011 with an option to renew for a further term of two (2) years;
2. NOTES that the use of Daisy House by Wanneroo Community Men’s Shed (Inc) is for charitable purposes and is therefore exempt from Council rates in accordance with Section 6.26(2)(g); and
3. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo and execute a lease between the City and Wanneroo Community Men’s Shed (Inc).
Attachments:
1. |
Wanneroo Community Men's Shed - Proposed Lease Area (Daisy House) |
11/83865 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 385
CS06-08/11 Acquisition of Land - Portion of Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall for the Lenore Road Deviation
File Ref: 1330 – 11/83560
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider purchasing an additional portion of Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall required for the realignment of Lenore Road, Wanneroo.
Background
The City is the registered proprietor of Lot 51 (formerly Lot 21) 176 Mary Street, Pearsall.
Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 5 May 2009 (CS08-05/09) resolved the following:
“That Council AUTHORISES the purchase of the Lenore Road reserve at Lot 21 (176) Mary Street from the City of Wanneroo for $1,048,580 plus GST with funds provided by East Wanneroo Scheme Cell 4.”
Since that time the land plan for the Lenore Road project has been revised revealing that additional land is required for the road reserve. Additional land is also required to expand the existing drainage sump. The total land area required from Lot 51 is 2774m2 (subject to survey) which consists of 1168m2 for the road reserve, and 1606m2 for the drainage sump.
Currently Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall is zoned mostly urban development, with a small portion to the east zoned rural resource. It is predicted that in the near future the whole of the land will be zoned residential with the potential to subdivide into residential lots.
Detail
The East Wanneroo Cell 4 Structure Plan provides for the upgrading of Lenore Road as Scheme Works funded by the Scheme. Part of the upgrading is to realign the southern section of Lenore Road to join Hartman Drive at Ocean Reef Road.
The proposed deviation passes through Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall (Attachment 1 refers).
The rate of development in East Wanneroo Cell 4 indicates that the upgrading of Lenore Road will be required in December 2011. To achieve this construction timetable the purchase of the land for the road reserve is required where the landowner will not be providing the road reserve through subdivision.
In December 2008 the City purchased land from Lot 1 & 2 Mary Street for the deviation of Lenore Road, and has commenced compulsory acquisition proceedings for the acquisition of the remaining portion required for the deviation in Lot 3 Mary Street. An overview of the area is shown in Attachment 2.
The City’s adopted englobo land value for East Wanneroo Cell 4 is $1,300,000 per hectare plus GST where applicable. The cost of the land parcel (2774m2) would be $360,620 plus GST.
The City leases part of Lot 51 to the Wanneroo BMX Raceway Club (Inc.). The portion of land required is outside the leased area on the eastern boundary.
In order to create the road reserve and drainage sump, a subdivision application must be submitted to the Western Australian Planning Commission by the City.
Comment
The price of $360,620 plus GST is in accordance with the requirements of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) Cell 4 being valued at the City’s adopted englobo land value.
The City owns the land so no negotiation or compulsory acquisition process will delay the transfer.
Statutory Compliance
The acquisition of land for Lenore Road is authorised as a Cell Work by Schedule 9 of DPS2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.5 Improve transport options and connections”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The acquisition of land for Cell Works is funded from the infrastructure contributions received by the East Wanneroo Cells in which the road is situated. The total cost of acquiring the road reserve from Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall will be funded by the East Wanneroo Cell 4 account.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. AUTHORISES the purchase of an additional portion of Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall from the City of Wanneroo for $360,620 plus GST with funds provided by East Wanneroo Scheme Cell 4;
2. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer to subdivide Lot 51 (176) Mary Street, Pearsall to create a road reserve and to expand the existing drainage sump for the Lenore Road deviation; and
3. AUTHORISES the Chief Executive Officer and Mayor to affix the common seal of the City of Wanneroo and endorse the signing of the New Title/Balance Application and any other associated documentation in relation to 1. above.
Attachments:
1. |
Lot 51 (176) Mary Street Pearsall Additional Land Requirement |
11/83563 |
|
2. |
Overview Lenore Road Deviation |
11/87230 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 390
File Ref: 4578 – 11/85301
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a new lease to The Salvation Army (Western Australia) Property Trust (the Salvation Army) over a portion of the Merriwa Administration Building, 16 Jenolan Way, Merriwa.
Background
The Salvation Army provides employment placement services under contract to the Commonwealth Government and is provided with funding for that purpose. It is a not-for-profit charity based entity that assists people in finding employment through the provision of vocational training programmes, provision of job searching facilities and post placement support.
The Merriwa Administration Building (the building) is situated on portion of Swan Location 1370 on Diagram 83356 being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume 1955 Folio 575, owned freehold by the City, and is accessible from Lansdowne Place (Attachment 1 refers). The Jenolan Way Community Centre is also situated on the same parcel of land and faces Jenolan Way.
The Salvation Army currently leases a 246m² portion of the building for use by The Salvation Army Employment Plus side of its operations. The lease expired on 30 June 2011 and is in month to month holdover at an annual rental of $36,225.
The building comprises the area used by the Salvation Army, which represents 58% of the total lettable area, a common area including the entry foyer and toilets, with the remainder potentially available for lease but currently being used by the City’s financial counselling services (Attachment 2 refers).
Detail
Lease discussions have been ongoing since January 2011 when the Salvation Army, due to the uncertainty of obtaining another contract from the Commonwealth Government beyond 1 July 2012, sought to renew its then current lease for a short term to the end of June 2012 to be in line with its financial year funding cycle. The Salvation Army subsequently approached the City on 29 June 2011 seeking a three year option period in addition to the term originally sought.
Under the City’s Tenancy Policy, The Salvation Army would be categorised as ‘Government’, therefore the lease terms are by negotiation. A new lease fee has been proposed at $36,900 per annum based on the same leased area of 246m² which is considered reasonable for a non-commercial rate for office space in the Merriwa area and will be subject to CPI increases should the three year option be exercised.
The Salvation Army will be granted access to use the entry foyer and toilets in the Common Area.
A formal lease proposal was forwarded to the Salvation Army on 14 July 2011 detailing the essential terms of the proposed lease. Final agreement has been reached, subject to Council approval, as follows:-
Commencement Date |
1 September 2011. |
Lease Term |
Ten (10) months with an option to renew for a further term of three (3) years. |
Lease Rental |
Commencing rental of $36,900 per annum (with annual CPI increments to apply from 1 July 2012 should the option be exercised). |
Council and Water Rates |
Included in lease rental. |
Building Insurance |
Lessee’s responsibility. Building insured by the City and charged to the Lessee on a pro rata basis (58%). |
Outgoings (water, electricity, gas and telephone etc.) |
Lessee’s responsibility. Charged to Lessee on a pro rata basis for usage. Lessee also responsible for 100% of any services that are billed direct, ie telephone. |
Maintenance |
Lessee’s responsibility for the internal of the lease area including walls, ceilings, lighting, flooring, fixtures and fittings and glass. The City will maintain the Common Area, the exterior of the building including the air-conditioning units, water and drainage services, and electrical switchboard. |
Statutory compliance |
Lessee’s responsibility for workers compensation, OH&S, and fire equipment, ie extinguishers within the leased area. The City will maintain the emergency and exit lighting within the leased area and the emergency exit doors as part of the management of the whole building. |
Comment
The Salvation Army has been a tenant in the Merriwa Administration Building since 2001 under concurrent lease arrangements and has proved to be a reliable and financially stable tenant to date, therefore, Administration supports the proposed lease.
Statutory Compliance
The proposed lease is considered exempt from Section 3.58 (Disposing of property) of the Local Government Act 1995 as the Salvation Army is considered a charitable not-for-profit body. Regulation 30 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 states:-
“30. Dispositions of property to which section 3.58 of Act does not apply
(1) A disposition that is described in this regulation as an exempt disposition is excluded from the application of section 3.58 of the Act.
(2) A disposition of land is an exempt disposition if –…
(b) the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not
(i) the objects of which are a charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational, sporting or other like nature; and
(ii) the members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit from the body’s transactions;…”
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.3 Improve the capacity of local communities to support each other”
“3 Economic
3.1 Create strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands”
“4 Governance
4.4 Maintain Long-Term Financial Stability”
Policy Implications
The proposed lease has been negotiated in accordance with the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Financial Implications
The lease would result in an annual income stream of $36,900 to increase on 1 July 2012 by CPI, should the option be exercised, and annually thereafter through the option term. 58% of the building insurance premiums and electricity, water and gas usage will also be recovered under the lease.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the leasing of an approximate 246m² portion of the Merriwa Administration Building at 16 Jenolan Way, Merriwa to The Salvation Army (Western Australia) Property Trust for a term of ten (10) months commencing 1 September 2011 at a commencing annual rental of $36,900 together with an option to renew for a further term of three (3) years (with annual CPI movements to the rental); and
2. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to and execute a lease between the City and the Salvation Army (Western Australia) Property Trust.
Attachments:
1. |
Attachment 1 - Site Plan |
11/87376 |
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Proposed Leased Area |
11/87378 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 August, 2011 395
File Ref: 5267 – 11/88707
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a change in the entities entering into a Deed of Covenant with the City for the development of the City’s community purpose site at Lot 19 (213) Kingsway, Darch.
Background
The Darch community purpose site (the site) is situated at the corner of Carlingford Drive and Kingsway, Darch being Lot 19 on Deposited Plan 58321 on Crown Reserve 50171 (Attachment 1 refers). The City has the care and control of the site under a Management Order dated 12 May 2009 for the purposes of ‘Community Purposes’.
Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 24 August 2010 resolved as follows:-
“That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the proposal for the development of the Community Purpose Site at Lot 19 (213) Kingsway, Darch by Ecorp Project Management subject to the normal planning approval process;
2. NOTES that the respective owners of the adjoining tavern and shopping centre development shall enter into a Deed with the City for the ongoing maintenance of the Community Purpose Site once the development is complete; and
3. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo and execute a formal Deed and associated Caveat documentation between the City and the owners of the tavern, being Lot 18 (211) Kingsway, Darch (Barwell Nominees P/L) and the shopping centre, being Lot 17 (225) Kingsway, Darch (Maple Holdings P/L and Calabria Investments P/L).”
Detail
Following lengthy negotiations, Barwell P/L and Calabria Investments P/L and Maple Holdings (WA) P/L (Calabria and Maple) signed the Deed of Covenent in March 2011 and returned it to the City. The document was executed on behalf of the City on 15 June 2011 and forwarded to the City’s solicitor for preparation and lodgement of the appropriate Caveat documentation.
Title searches conducted prior to the lodgement of the Caveats revealed that the ownership of Lot 17 had been transferred, as a result of changes to the respective trustee companies, from Calabria and Maple to UFT Investments WA Pty Ltd and MHT Holdings WA Pty Ltd (UFT and MHT) back in November 2010. The Directors of the new companies remain the same. Barwell P/L remains the registered owner of Lot 18 and a caveat has been lodged against that title.
The changes had taken effect well prior to the Deed being signed by Calabria and Maple in March 2011 and as a result a new Deed will need to be prepared and signed by all parties.
All costs associated with the preparation of the new Deed and registration of the caveat against Lot 17 will be at the costs of UFT and MHT.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The preparation and execution of a new Deed of Covenant will provide security to the City to ensure the obligations under the Deed are carried by UFT and MHT through the registration of a caveat against Lot 17.
A development application has been lodged by the developer on behalf of the tavern and shopping centre owners to develop the site however the application will not be assessed and/or approved by the City until the appropriate Deed documentation has been finalised.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
All costs associated with the preparation of the new Deed of Covenant and Caveat will be borne by UFT and MHT.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that the ownership of Lot 17 (225) Kingsway, Darch was transferred in November 2010 from Calabria Investments Pty Ltd and Maple Holdings (WA) Pty Ltd to UFT Investments WA Pty Ltd and MHT Holdings Pty Ltd and a new Deed of Covenant between the City and the owners of Lot 17 (225) and Lot 18 (211) is now required to ensure the obligations under the original Deed of Covenant dated 15 June 2011 for the ongoing maintenance of the adjoining Community Purpose Site are transferred to the new entities;
2. NOTES that all costs associated with the preparation of the new Deed and Caveat will be borne by UFT Investments WA Pty Ltd and MHT Holdings Pty Ltd; and
3. AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo and execute a formal Deed of Covenant and associated Caveat documentation between the City and the owners of the shopping centre, being Lot 17 (225) Kingsway, Darch (UFT Investments WA Pty Ltd and MHT Holdings Pty Ltd) and the owners of the tavern, being Lot 18 (211) Kingsway, Darch (Barwell Nominees P/L).
Attachments:
1. |
Site Plan |
11/91078 |
|
Chief Executive Office
File Ref: 2855 – 11/83677
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To note applications for sponsorships, donations and waivers of fees and charges considered and determined by the Chief Executive Officer from 15 June to 28 July 2011 in accordance with the provisions of the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy delegates the consideration of requests for sponsorships, donations and waivers of fees and charges under a specified value to the Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
During the period, the City received the following requests:
1. 16 requests for sponsorship; and
2. One request for donations and waivers of fees.
Comment
In accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy, determinations were made as listed in the recommendation to this report.
Applications and assessments of each request against the policy are available from Governance upon request. Among other criteria, sponsorship is given to individuals who reside within the City of Wanneroo, are 18 years of age or under and have not already received sponsorship in the same financial year.
Donations are given to groups who are located or have primary business in the City of Wanneroo and 75% or more of their membership resides within the City of Wanneroo.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
This report aligns with the provisions and delegations of the Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial Implications
Approval of these requests has resulted in expenditure under Delegated Authority in the Award Governance Donations Account (717633-1207-316) of $4,150.00.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of requests received by the City from 15 June to 28 July 2011 for donations, sponsorships and waiver of fees and charges (total of $4,150.00) which are as follows:-
Sporting and education donation requests
No. |
Organisation |
Amount |
Recommendation |
Reason |
|||
1. |
Football West |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Football West for Pippa King to attend the 2011 Football Federation Australia National Youth Championships for Girls to be held in Coffs Harbour, NSW from 10 – 16 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
2. |
Rugby WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Rugby WA for Moss Gilmore to attend the NSW Under 15 State Championships to be held in Sydney NSW from 1 - 4 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
3. |
School Sport WA |
$400.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $400.00 to School Sport WA for Courtney Omedi and Hope Compton to attend the Australian School Sport Championships to be held in Adelaide SA from 14 - 19 August 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
4. |
Basketball WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Basketball WA for Hannah King to attend the U16 Australian Junior Basketball Championship to be held in Kilsyth VIC from 9 – 16 July 2011 |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
5. |
West Australian Little Athletics |
$500.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $500.00 to West Australian Little Athletics for Jean-Chaul Smith to attend the Singapore/Malaysian WALA Track & Field Championships to be held in Kuala Lumpur from 9 - 10 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
6. |
School Sport WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to School Sport WA for Jessica Gorman to attend the WA Schools AFL Girls 16 yrs team event to be held in Canberra ACT from 22 – 30 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
7. |
Calisthenics Association of WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Calisthenics Association of WA for Sydney Gallagher to attend the National Calisthenics Championships to be held at the Gold Coast, Qld on 6 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
8. |
High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics Academy |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to High Flyers Trampoline & Gymnastics Academy for Alex D’Cruz to attend the 2011 Australian Men’s Gymnastic Championships to be held in Canberra ACT from 14 – 19 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
9. |
Ridgewood Athletics Club |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Ridgewood Athletics Club for Dale Hennighan to attend the National Long Track Walk Championships to be held in Canberra ACT on 21 August 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
10. |
School Sport WA |
$400.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $400.00 to School Sport WA for Liam Driscoll and Penny-Lane Field to attend the National 12s Football Team Championships to be held in Canberra ACT from 3 – 9 September 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
11. |
Lacrosse WA |
$500.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $500.00 to Lacrosse WA for Hayley Simpson to attend the 2011 U19 World Championship to be held in Germany from 4 – 14 August 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
12. |
Ritmico Gymnastics |
$150.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $150.00 to Ritmico Gymnastics for Breanna Wegener and Yuliya Lozovyk to attend the Australian Rhythmic Gymnastic Championships to be held in Perth WA from 11 – 17 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
13. |
School Sport WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to School Sport WA for Kristen Jayasuria to attend the WA Schools AFL Girls 16 yrs team event to be held in Canberra ACT from 22 – 30 July 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
14. |
Lakelands Country Club |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Lakelands Country Club for Aaron Dobson to attend the School Sport National Golf Championship to be held in Adelaide SA from 28 August – 3 September 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
15. |
School Sport WA |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to School Sport WA for Elliot Welsh to attend the WA Schools Cross Country Championships to be held in Canberra, ACT from 18 – 22 August 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
16. |
Western Australian Rugby League Ltd |
$200.00 |
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to Western Australian Rugby League Ltd for Tiaki Paku to attend the Australian School Boys U12 National Championships to be held in Melbourne, Vic from 6 – 13 August 2011. |
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy. |
|||
TOTAL |
$4,150.00 |
|
|||||
Community Group Donation & Waiver of Fees Requests
No. |
Organisation |
Amount |
Recommendation |
Reason |
1. |
Westcoasters Netball Club Kingsway |
$0 |
NOT APPROVE a donation of promotional items to the Westcoasters Netball Club Kingsway for a fundraising quiz night to be held on 1 July 2011 at the Woodvale Tavern Function Centre, Woodvale. |
The request does not satisfy the criteria of the policy. |
TOTAL |
$0 |
|
Attachments: Nil
Item 9 Motions on Notice
MN01-08/11 Cr Brett Treby – Girradoola Going Places Christmas Community Celebration - Hallmark Event
File Ref: 5206 – 11/91088
Author: Cr Brett Treby
Action Officer: Director, Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider nominating Girradoola Going Places Christmas Community Celebration event as a Hallmark Event in the October 2011 Community Funding Round, and to consider recognising the event as a part-City event so as to provide in-kind support and insurance coverage.
Background
For the past eight years there has been a Community Christmas Event held in the South Ward of Wanneroo which has been organised by a Committee consisting of City of Wanneroo Councillors, local not-for-profit agencies, members of State parliament and interested community members. In the past, Anglicare has coordinated this event, though this is no longer the case as of 2010.
In 2010, due to difficulties in organising support for the event following Anglicare’s reduction in involvement, the City of Wanneroo provided insurance for the event as well as substantial in-kind support. The event remains highly successful attracting over 800 attendees from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds. In addition to providing entertainment, the event was used to distribute gifts for children and is specifically targeted at local families with young children.
The City has been supportive of being given the opportunity to be involved with the event in the past, with the Community Development Officer (South Zone) taking an active role both in providing administrative support to the organising committee and in “hands on” support during the running of the event. Further, the City has in 2010 taken on full responsibility for both the administration and insurance of the event.
Detail
Planning for the 2011 event is currently underway and the City has maintained its active engagement in the organising committee, led by the continued involvement of Councillor Mackenzie.
Comment
I am seeking Council’s support in recognising the event as a part-City event, the City will be able to continue to supply significant in-kind support to the event and potentially cover required public liability insurance. Recognition of the event as a Hallmark Event under the City’s Community Funding program would enable financial support to be given to the event on the basis of a three year agreement, recognising the City’s long-term commitment to this iconic event.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
Under the Community Funding policy, Council may provide funding under the Hallmark Funding Program to: “...key events that contribute to the City’s history and identity, as determined by Council for any given funding round”. Should Council identify the Girradoola Going Places Christmas Community Celebration event as a Hallmark Event, it will be eligible for funding under the policy in the October 2011 round of Community Funding. However due to the need to provide certainty to the organising committee ahead of the October Round I am seeking Council’s support in endorsing the important community event ahead of this round.
Financial Implications
The organising committee for this event has not yet requested financial assistance from the City. Hallmark Funding allocations are typically less than $3,000.00 each year, for a three year period. This event has also received support through the Mayor’s annual appeal in the form of cash to purchase gifts and non-perishable food items donated by the community. As a result I am recommending an allocation of $2,000 per annum plus staff support costs, in place of the previous support from the Mayor’s Appeal.
In addition the organising committee has requested a Waiver of hire fees for the additional rubbish bins required at the event and for the hire of Butterworth Park.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ENDORSES the Girradoola Going Places Christmas Community Celebration event as a Hallmark Event in the City’s October 2011 Community Funding round for a period of three years including:
a) an allocation of $2,000 per annum;
b) recognition as a City of Wanneroo supported event;
c) auspicing of the event by the City of Wanneroo including coverage of the event through the City’s Public Liability Insurance; and
d) a waiver of fees for waste collection and venue hire for the day of the event.
Administration Comment
Community funding allocation is a policy decision of Council and on this basis Administration is supportive of the proposal being funded through the Community Funding Program.
Attachments: Nil
Item 10 Urgent Business
File Ref: 5642 – 11/90523
Responsible Officer: Director, Infrastructure
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
(d) legal advice obtained, or which may be obtained, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
File Ref: 5642 – 11/90806
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government
File Ref: 5642 – 11/90831
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
The next Elected Members’ Briefing Session has been
scheduled for 6.00pm on Tuesday,
13 September 2011, to be held at Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.