Council Agenda
Ordinary
Council Meeting
7.00pm, 11 October, 2011
Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Public Question & Statement Time
Council allows a minimum of
15 minutes for public questions and statements at each Council Meeting.
If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the person
presiding will move on to the next item. If there are more questions than
can be dealt with in the 15 minutes allotted, the person presiding will
determine whether to extend question time.
Protocols
During the meeting, no
member of the public may interrupt the meeting’s proceedings or enter
into conversation. Each person seeking to ask questions during public
question time may address the Council for a maximum of 3 minutes each.
A register of person’s
wishing to ask a question/s at the Council Meeting is located at the main
reception desk outside of the Chamber on the night. However, members of
the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with
the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting
i.e. noon on the previous day.
The person presiding will
control public question time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a
question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. A person wishing
to ask a question should state his or her name and address before asking the
question. If the question relates to an item on the agenda, the item
number should also be stated.
The
following general rules apply to question and statement time:
·
Questions should only relate to the business of the council and
should not be a statement or personal opinion.
·
Only questions relating to matters affecting Council will be
considered at an ordinary meeting, and at a special meeting only questions that
relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered. Questions may be
taken on notice and responded to after the meeting.
·
Questions may not be directed at specific members of council or
employees.
·
Questions & statements are not to be framed in such a way as
to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or Officer.
·
The first priority will be given to persons who are asking
questions relating to items on the current meeting agenda.
·
The second priority will be given to public statements.
Only statements regarding items on the agenda under consideration will be
heard.
The
Mayor and Councillors will conduct an informal session on the same day as the
meeting of the Council at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm
where members of the public may, by appointment, present deputations. If you
wish to present a deputation please submit your request for a deputation in
writing, at least three clear business days prior to the meeting addressed to
the Chief Executive Officer or fax through to Governance on 9405 5097. A
request for a deputation must be received by Governance by 12 noon on the
Friday before the Council Meeting.
·
A deputation is not to exceed 3 persons in number and only those
persons may address the meeting.
·
Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10
minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the
Council.
Please ensure that mobile
phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber. Any queries
on this agenda, please contact Governance on 9405 5027 or 9405 5018.
Recording of Council Meetings Policy
Objective
·
To ensure that there is a process
in place to outline access to the recorded proceedings of Council.
·
To emphasise that the reason for
recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Minutes and
that any reproduction is for the sole purpose of Council business.
Statement
Recording of
Proceedings
(1) Proceedings for meetings
of the Council, Electors, Audit Committee and Public Question Time during
Council Briefing Sessions shall be recorded by the City on sound
recording equipment, except in the case of meetings of the Council where the
Council closes the meeting to the public.
(2) Notwithstanding subclause
(1), proceedings of a meeting of the Council which is closed to the public
shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
(3) No member of the public is
to use any electronic, visual or vocal recording device or instrument to record
the proceedings of the Council or a committee without the written permission of
the Council.
Access to Recordings
(4) Members of the public may
purchase a copy of recorded proceedings or alternatively listen to recorded
proceedings with the supervision of a City Officer. Costs of providing
recorded proceedings to members of the public will be the cost of the CD plus
staff time to make the copy of the proceedings. The cost of supervised
listening to recorded proceedings will be the cost of the staff time. The cost
of staff time will be set in the City's schedule of fees and charges each year.
(5) Elected Members may
request a recording of the Council proceedings at no charge. However, no
transcript will be produced without the approval of the Chief Executive
Officer. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are
requested by individual Members.
Retention of Recordings
(6) Recordings pertaining to
the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the
State Records Act 2000 (General Disposal Authority for Local Government
Records). The current requirement for the retention of recorded proceedings is
thirty (30) years.
Disclosure of Policy
(7) This policy shall be
printed within the agenda of all Council, Special Council, Electors and Special
Electors meetings to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are
recorded.
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting
will be held at the Civic Centre
Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 11 October, 2011
commencing at 7.00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive
Officer
6 October, 2011
CONTENTS
Item 1_____ Attendances_ 1
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence_ 1
Item 3_____ Public Question Time_ 1
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes_ 1
OC01-10/11 Minutes of Ordinary
Council Meeting held on 20 September 2011 1
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion_ 1
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members_ 1
Item 7_____ Petitions_ 1
New Petitions Received 1
Update on Petitions 1
PT01-09/11 Requesting
Retention of Traffic Arrangements in Bellerive Boulevard. 1
PT02-09/11 Review Through
Traffic between Cooper Street and Hartman Drive. 2
PT03-09/11 RAAFA Estate
– Sound Barrier Wall 2
PT04-09/11 Dualling of
Wanneroo Road 2
PT05-09/11 Remove Temporary
Closure at Backshall Place, Ocean Reef Road 2
Item 8_____ Reports_ 2
Planning and Sustainability 3
Policies and Studies 3
PS01-10/11 Department of Water
Discussion Paper: Review of First-in-First-served Policy Regarding Assessment
of Water Licence Applications 3
Town Planning Schemes & Structure
Plans 10
PS02-10/11 Proposed Amendment
No. 121 Landscape Enhancement Zone 10
PS03-10/11 Adoption of
Amendment No. 35 to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Agreed Structure Plan No. 8 36
PS04-10/11 Amendment No. 1 to
Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A 48
PS05-10/11 Agreement of
Yanchep City Local Structure Plan No. 68 55
PS06-10/11 Agreement of
Amendment No. 6 to Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 101
City Businesses 164
Regulatory Services 164
CB01-10/11 Application To Keep More
Than Two Dogs 164
CB02-10/11 Authorising Persons to
Act Under Division 2 of the Building Act 2011 169
CB03-10/11 Application for a Code
Variation for a Single House on Lot 403 (43) Hazel Avenue, Quinns Rocks 180
Infrastructure 190
Asset Management 190
IN01-10/11 Revised Lake
Gnangara Strategic Offset Proposal - Progress Report and Additional
Requirements 190
IN02-10/11 Stormwater
Drainage Asset Management Plan 197
Tenders 201
IN03-10/11 Tender No
01131 - Provision of Seed Collection and Plant Propagation Services from
Reserves within the City of Wanneroo 201
Traffic Management 208
IN04-10/11 Regents
Estates - Backshall Place Trial Road Closure - Community Consultation Results 208
IN05-10/11 PT01-05/11
Hinchinbrook Avenue, Ridgewood - Request for Traffic Calming 223
IN06-10/11 PT02-06/11
Request Closure of Atley Pass, Carramar 228
Community Development 232
Corporate Strategy & Performance 232
Finance 232
CS01-10/11 Warrant of Payments for
the Period to 30 September 2011 232
CS02-10/11 Financial Activity
Statement for the Period Ending 31 August 2011 281
Governance and Executive Services 293
CS03-10/11 Donations to be
Considered by Council - October 2011 293
CS04-10/11 Review of Donations,
Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy 298
CS05-10/11 Approval of Council
Meeting Dates for 2012 315
Property 319
CS06-10/11 Proposed Lease to Optus
Mobile Pty Ltd for a Low Impact Facility 319
Chief Executive Office 324
Office of the CEO Reports 324
CE01-10/11 Donation Requests
Considered Under Delegated Authority of the Chief Executive Officer 324
Item 9_____ Motions on Notice_ 327
MN01-10/11 Mayor Jon Kelly – Revoke
a Decision of Council - Wanneroo City Soccer Club Floodlighting 327
MN02-10/11 Mayor Jon Kelly – Quinns
Rocks Sports Club Request for Funding 330
Item 10____ Urgent Business_ 334
Item 11____ Confidential_ 334
CR01-10/11 Retrospective Development
Application for Shop, Warehouse and Ancillary Storage and Loading areas at Lot
888 (39) Prindiville Drive, Wangara 334
CR02-10/11 Small Business Centre
North West Metro Funding 2011/12 334
CR03-10/11 Tender No. 01129 -
Construction of an External Lift to the Kingsway Indoor Stadium 130 Kingsway,
Madeley 334
CR04-10/11 Adoption of Business Plan
for the Disposal of Lot 12 Fowey Loop, Mindarie 334
CR05-10/11 Proposed Sale of Portion
of Lot 506 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo 335
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting_ 335
Item 13____ Closure_ 335
Item 1 Attendances
Item 2 Apologies
and Leave of Absence
Item 3 Public
Question Time
Item 4 Confirmation
of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 20
September 2011 be confirmed, subject to the following amendment:
Item MN01-09/11 “Cr Bob Smithson – Revoke a
Decision of Council on 23 August 2011 – Drovers Place Precinct Structure
Plan (Structure Plan 80) – Report on Submissions and Consideration for
Final Approval”
Remove Mayor Jon Kelly from the vote and record Cr Steffens
as voting against the motion, and Cr Roberts as voting for the motion.
Item 5 Announcements
by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions
from Elected Members
Item
7 Petitions
New Petitions Received
Update on Petitions
|
|
|
Cr McKenzie presented a petition of 80 signatures from
residents of the Madeley suburb to support the retention of the current
traffic arrangements for Bellerive Boulevard, being no vehicular thoroughfare
between Hepburn Avenue and Kingsway.
UPDATE
The
Agreed Kingsway City Activity Centre Structure Plan No. 59, endorsed by both
Council and the Western Australian Planning Commission, shows Bellerive
Boulevard being extended through to Hepburn Avenue and requires any expansion
of the Kingsway Shopping Centre to include the completion of this
connection.
An
application for a proposed expansion of the Kingsway City Shopping Centre was
recently advertised for public comment and includes the Bellerive Boulevard
extension. The advertising period for the proposal closed on 22 August
2011. The application, together with any submissions received and the
petition will be assessed and considered by Administration and then presented
to a Council meeting for consideration.
A
report on this proposal will be presented to Council in the near future.
|
|
|
|
Cr Treby presented a petition of 20 signatures from
residents in and around Cheltondale Drive, Madeley requesting Council support
to review the through traffic from Cooper Street and Hartman Drive through to
Kingsway Road.
UPDATE
Report
scheduled for December meeting.
|
|
|
|
Cr Steffens presented a petition of 195 signatures from
residents of the RAAFA Estate Merriwa asking the City to add to the next
financial budget the costs of erecting a sound barrier wall bordering their
property in Lukin Drive.
UPDATE
Report
scheduled for December meeting.
|
|
|
|
Cr Steffens presented a petition of 466 signatures from
residents requesting that Council write to the Premier, Colin Barnett and
Minister for Transport, Troy Buswell requesting that the duelling of Wanneroo
Road between Joondalup Drive Carramar and Menchetti Road Neerabup be included
in the 2012-2013 State Budget due to the high and ongoing fatalities.
UPDATE
Letter
sent from Mayor’s office on 23 September 2011.
|
|
|
|
Cr Monks presented a petition of 175 signatures formally
requesting Council’s consideration to remove the temporary road closure
at Backshall Place and Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo which restricts traffic from
entering the Regent Waters Estate via Backshall place at the intersection of
Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo.
UPDATE
Report
going to 11 October 2011 meeting.
|
Item 8 Reports
Declarations of
Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest.
Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive
Officer.
Planning
and Sustainability
Policies and Studies
PS01-10/11 Department
of Water Discussion Paper: Review of First-in-First-served Policy Regarding
Assessment of Water Licence Applications
File Ref: 2036
– 11/108701
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a discussion paper released for comment by the
Department of Water (DoW) regarding assessment of water licence applications.
Background
Currently, water allocation plans have been prepared by DoW
for many areas of the State. In the case of the Gnangara
Groundwater Areas Allocation Plan which includes the City of Wanneroo, this
includes an ‘allocation limit’ for each ‘Sub-Area’ of
the plan, which is the total amount of water in a Sub-Area that will be made
available to water users through issue of licences by the Minister for Water
(through DoW).
Applications for licences are made to the DoW under the
Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914, and the Act requires that all relevant
matters be considered in deciding whether a licence should be granted,
including whether the proposed taking and use of water –
“a) are in the public
interest;
b) are ecologically
sustainable;
c) are environmentally
acceptable;
d) may prejudice other
current and future needs for water;
e) would, in the opinion of
the Minister, have a detrimental effect on another person;
g) are in keeping with
–
(i) local
practices;
(ii) a
relevant local by-law;
(iii) a
plan approved under Part III Division 3D Subdivision 2; or
(iv) relevant
previous decisions of the Minister;
or
h) are consistent with
–
(i) land
use planning instruments;
(ii) the
requirements and policies of other government agencies, or
(iii) any
intergovernmental agreement or arrangement.”
While a licence application fee is involved, no payment is
required for the water itself.
When the amount of water allocated through licensing reaches
the allocation limit of a Sub-Area, then no further water will be allocated
through granting of new licences.
Potential water users in that Sub-Area are then required to
secure water by either buying or leasing it from existing licence holders
through water trading (i.e. the operation of a market mechanism).
Prior to the water allocation limit being reached, DoW
assesses applications for new licences on the basis of a ‘first-in
first-served’ policy. That is, it assesses each application as it
is received, and only having regard to the matters set out under the Act as
referred to earlier.
The DoW is undertaking this review of its ‘first-in
first-served’ policy at the request of the Minister for Water.
Detail
The discussion paper has been released for public comment,
with submissions due by 28 October 2011.
The discussion paper advises that following consideration of
submissions, DoW will develop a policy in early 2012 for approval of the
Minister for Water. However, it is not intended to release a draft policy
for public comment.
A copy of the discussion paper has been placed in the
Elected Members Reading Room.
Key Elements of the Discussion Paper:
1. Discussion Paper
Assessment of First-in First-served (FIFS) Policy
The DoW consider that in situations where water is abundant,
the FIFS approach has significant merit compared with more administratively
complex approaches. In this situation, water is available for all uses and does
not require a price or other selection process to direct it to the highest
value use, and there are advantages in using approaches that result in the
least cost to all parties.
However, in situations where water availability is limited
(such as the City of Wanneroo), mechanisms to direct water to higher value uses
will be preferable to the FIFS approach provided they can be feasibly and
practically implemented.
2. Other Options
Considered by the Discussion Paper
The discussion paper considers a number of other options for
how licence applications could be assessed, as summarised below:
· Merit
selection: involving determining what applications potential water users are
proposing, and assessing those on a comparative basis using criteria addressing
economic, social, cultural and other values;
· Auctions
and tenders;
· Direct
sale: where licence applicants would be required to pay for the water sought,
according to a fixed price nominated by DoW;
· Ballot:
where applications are ‘drawn out of a hat’.
3. Preferred Approach
The approach preferred by DOW is to apply the current FIFS
policy up to 70% of the allocation limit, but once 70% of that limit is
reached, a market based mechanism be used, in particular the auction
approach. It also notes that other market based mechanisms of tenders and
direct sales may be appropriate in certain circumstances.
Consultation
DoW is inviting submissions on the discussion paper from
stakeholder groups, industry, government and the general community by 28
October 2011.
Comment
In considering the implications of the discussion paper for
the City of Wanneroo, it is appropriate to firstly consider the degree to which
allocation limits currently applying to the various Sub-Areas covering the City
have, or have not, been reached.
According to the Gnangara Groundwater Areas Allocation Plan
(DoW, November 2009), of the 18 Sub-Areas covering the City of Wanneroo (see
map included at Attachment 1), all have reached (or exceeded) their
allocation limit, except for the following, which are all described as having
only ‘limited’ water available:
|
Sub-Area
|
% Allocated
|
|
Landsdale
|
92% allocated
|
|
Plantation
|
88% allocated
|
|
Joondalup
|
87% allocated
|
|
Carramar
|
90% allocated
|
|
Neerabup
|
97% allocated
|
|
Quinns
|
Limited
|
|
Eglinton
|
Limited
|
|
Yanchep
|
Limited
|
The percentage of allocation of the Quinns, Eglinton and
Yanchep Sub-Areas cannot be provided in the above listing, as the limited
availability of water in those Sub-Areas arises from large (unspecified)
amounts which have been ‘reserved’ under the allocation plan for
future public water supply (i.e. Water Corporation).
The implications of the discussion paper for the City of
Wanneroo fall into two areas, as discussed below:
1. City of Wanneroo
as a water user
This particularly relates to the City’s use of
groundwater for irrigation of recreation areas.
For several years now, the City has been addressing the
matter of how to secure the well licences it requires for irrigation of future
recreation areas in Sub-Areas where groundwater is severely constrained.
The City’s northern coastal growth corridor is, in
particular, the subject of current detailed assessment by the City and DoW to
address that area’s future requirements.
In this respect, the DOW discussion paper is encouraging
because while it says that the broad issue of ‘reserving’ water in
allocation plans is to be the subject of a future discussion paper, it includes
the following statement:
“If social criteria are also included in the
definition of the highest value use, then only the merit selection or tender
process will directly assess value based on both criteria. While issues
such as availability of water for public water supply, and public open space
requirements (particularly schools and sporting facilities) could be managed
through a prioritisation mechanism, reservation through planning processes is a
more effective tool.
Reserving water for such purposes would provide greater
certainty, cost effectiveness and transparency (and is recommended through this
paper)” (page 22).
This recommendation for reserving of water for purposes,
including public open space requirements, is strongly supported, as it
recognises the basic requirement of new urban areas for irrigated open space.
2. City
of Wanneroo as a district whose local economy includes irrigated agriculture
The DoW preferred approach would mean that when a Sub-Area
reaches 70% allocation, water users will then need to start paying for that
water through the auction process which is above the 70% allocation, rather
than receiving it for free as under the current policy.
The information provided earlier in this report indicates
that according to the Gnangara Groundwater Areas Allocation Plan, only eight of
the 18 Sub-Areas covering the City of Wanneroo have any water remaining for
allocation.
For the Sub-Areas which currently include significant
irrigated agriculture (e.g. Carabooda) and which are fully allocated, the DoW
preferred approach will not have any effect as there is no water available for
allocation in those areas anyway.
Of the eight Sub-Areas which do have water available for
allocation, three of these include rural zoned land which is intended to remain
zoned rural under current planning strategies:
· Carramar
(agriculture is able to be permitted in parts of the Carramar Park Special
Rural Zone area);
· Neerabup
(the strip of rural land between Wanneroo Road and Lake Neerabup);
· Eglinton
(the two rural pockets of land between Wanneroo Road and the Mitchell Freeway
reserve alignment).
Although the Gnangara Groundwater Areas Allocation Plan
describes water availability in each of these Sub-Areas as
‘limited’, the DoW preferred approach would still have implications
for existing agricultural operations in those areas wishing to obtain
additional water to expand, or new operators wishing to establish. They
would need to pay (through auction) for this water, rather than being able to
obtain it free-of-cost as at present.
This raises a number of concerns as follows:
1. The
discussion paper and the government media release relating to it do not make it
clear that the effect of the preferred approach is basically that applicants
for water licences will be having to pay for that water (where 70% of the
allocation limit has been reached). This is instead of being able to
receive the water for free as under the current policy. Many growers will
not likely be aware of this and might therefore not make any submission to DoW
on the matter.
2. There
does not appear to have been any detailed study done as to what the impacts of
this preferred approach on growers may be, and particularly what impacts it may
have on the viability of irrigated agriculture near to the Perth metropolitan
region and the consequential impacts on market prices and availability of fresh
local produce.
It is
recommended that the above concerns be raised with DoW.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“1 Environment
1.2 Protect,
conserve and recycle water”
This matter is also relevant to the Draft City Water
Management Strategy, particularly its strategies relating to district
groundwater allocation planning.
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
If the City is unable to receive free groundwater for its
irrigation of open space areas, then it may be required to either pay for
groundwater, or pay for use of scheme water for that purpose.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council SUBMITS the following comments to the
Department of Water regarding its Discussion Paper: Review of First-in
First-served Policy:
1. The
discussion paper’s recommendation (page 22) that water be reserved for
public open space requirements (particularly schools and sporting facilities)
is strongly supported. When required, this reserved water then also needs
to be made freely available, and not subject to the operation of any market
based mechanism;
2. Stakeholders,
particularly those involved in irrigated agriculture, should be made more
clearly aware that the preferred approach recommended in the discussion paper
involves having to pay for water which they currently do not otherwise have to
pay for, when applying for licences where 70% of the allocation limit has been
reached;
3. A
detailed study should be undertaken to assess what impacts the discussion
paper’s preferred approach may have on irrigated agriculture, and
particularly the viability of irrigated agriculture within the Perth
metropolitan region;
4. The
City is concerned that agricultural irrigators within the City of Wanneroo may
be unaware of the Discussion Paper and its implications for their operations.
Accordingly, it is strongly recommended that the Department extent the public
comment period on the Discussion Paper and directly write to all affected
licence holders advising them of the Discussion Paper and the ability to
comment; and
5. The
City is concerned at and objects to the prospect of the Discussion Paper being
translated into a Policy position without a Draft Policy first being advertised
for public comment. Any change to the existing Policy or preparation of a new
Policy should be subject to public comment prior to being formally considered
for adoption.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Groundwater sub-areas
|
11/109763
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 9
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 10
Town Planning
Schemes & Structure Plans
PS02-10/11 Proposed
Amendment No. 121 Landscape Enhancement Zone
File Ref: 6020
– 11/102936
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider initiating Amendment
No. 121 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) for the purpose of:
· Introducing
a new zone titled ‘Landscape Enhancement’ zone with accompanying
provisions and land use table permissibility (refer Attachment 1);
· Introducing
provisions to enable the creation of Special Control Areas (refer Attachment
1); and
·
Amending the Scheme Map to rezone parts of Carabooda and Nowergup
from ‘Rural Resource’ and ‘General Rural’ to
‘Landscape Enhancement’ and applying a Special Control Area over
that land, as depicted in Attachment 2.
Background
Council initiated Amendment No.
108 to DPS 2 at its meeting of 6 April 2010 (PS03-04/10). Amendment No. 108:
· Introduced
a new zone titled ‘Landscape Enhancement’ with accompanying
provisions and land use table permissibility; and
· Amended
the Scheme Map to rezone parts of Carabooda and Nowergup to ‘Landscape
Enhancement’.
This Amendment was prepared in
direct response to Recommendation 6.4 of the Western Australian Planning
Commission’s (WAPC’s) report (August 2007) titled ‘The
Future of East Wanneroo: Land use and water management in the context of
Network City’.
On 22 April 2010, Amendment No.
108 was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment,
pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. The EPA
advised (on 10 May 2010) that the proposed scheme amendment did not require
assessment and that it was not necessary to provide any advice or
recommendations.
The Amendment was also forwarded to the WAPC on 22 April
2010, requesting the Minister for Planning’s permission for it to be
advertised for public comment. This was necessary as Amendment No. 108 was
inconsistent with State Planning Policy 2.4 (Basic Raw Materials) insofar as
the Amendment proposed to prohibit extractive industry operations in the new
Landscape Enhancement zone, while also allowing a range of residential
accommodation and tourist-based uses to be approved in the new zone instead of
extractive industry activities.
On 3 December 2010, the WAPC wrote to the City advising that
the Minister for Planning refused to grant his consent to advertise Amendment
No. 108 on the basis that it:
1. Is
contrary to State Planning Policy No. 2.4 Basic Raw Materials;
2. Is
inconsistent with the ‘Rural’ zoning of the land in the
Metropolitan Region Scheme and the long term policy intentions are not
supported by local structure planning for the Carabooda Nowergup localities;
3. Is
premature in the absence of structure planning and strategic planning for the
area; and
4. Introduces
a range of discretionary and prohibited uses considered inappropriate in this
area in the context of the ‘Rural’ zoning of the land under the MRS
and the existing intensive agricultural uses and extractive industry operating
in Carabooda and Nowergup.
Administration informed affected landowners of the
Minister’s decision by way of letter on 21 January 2011.
On 4 February 2011, Administration met with staff from the
Department of Planning to investigate ways to address and overcome the concerns
raised by the Minister for Planning in respect of the original version of the
Amendment. Administration has now prepared another Amendment to DPS 2,
Amendment No. 121, to replace the previous Amendment No. 108 and to respond to
the Minister’s reasons for refusal.
Detail
Proposed DPS 2 Amendment
Proposed Amendment No. 121 to DPS 2 comprises the following
key components:
Creation of a new zone and text provisions
The Amendment proposes to introduce a new zone titled
‘Landscape Enhancement’. The term Landscape Enhancement has also
been used in Council’s Landscape Enhancement Areas Policy dated July
1999. This Policy identifies four areas in the City (including parts of
Nowergup and Carabooda captured within the ‘Linear Lakes’ Landscape
Enhancement area) as areas of environmental importance warranting special
planning and development consideration.
To accompany the new Landscape Enhancement zone, a set of
provisions is proposed to be included in DPS 2. The provisions outline the
purpose and intent of the new zone and provide broad guidance on subdivision
and development within the area.
The draft scheme provisions include a provision setting out
minimum lot sizes for subdivision. The minimum lot sizes are shown on a map
proposed to be included as Schedule 17 to DPS 2 (refer Attachment 1),
and are the same as those minimum lot sizes set out for this area in
Council’s Subdivision of Rural Zoned Land Policy.
In addition, Table 1, the Zoning Table of DPS 2, is to be
amended to also include the new Landscape Enhancement zone with a range of
corresponding uses either prohibited, or permitted to varying degrees (refer Attachments
1 and 2). The use permissibilities reflect the objective of
the Landscape Enhancement zone to accommodate rural residential development,
agricultural and horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism activities.
Creation of Special Control Areas
The Amendment proposes to introduce provisions into Part 5
of DPS 2 to enable the creation of Special Control Areas under the Scheme.
Included in these provisions is a specific Special Control Area that will apply
to land zoned Landscape Enhancement that is within 300 metres of land
identified as a priority resource under State Planning Policy 2.4. This Special
Control Area will overlay the proposed Landscape Enhancement Zone and will
apply to the affected area in addition to any provisions applying to the base
zoning.
The proposed Special Control Area will apply to land within
the Landscape Enhancement Zone that is within 300 metres of land identified as
a priority resource under State Planning Policy 2.4. The Special Control Area
will restrict land uses to those that are currently permissible within the
Rural Resource Zone, except for extractive industry, which would be prohibited.
The 300 metre separation distance has been taken from the minimum 300 metre
separation distance recommended between extractive industries and sensitive
land uses, by EPA’s Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors
No. 3 (Separation Distances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses).
Considering the above, the area now proposed to be zoned
‘Landscape Enhancement’ is geographically smaller than the area
that was previously proposed to be rezoned by Amendment No. 108. This is a
direct result of excluding the State Government’s designated priority
resource areas and applying a 300 metre separation distance from those areas.
Included as Attachment 3 is a plan depicting the reduced extent of
rezoning proposed by Amendment No. 121, compared to that previously proposed by
Amendment No. 108, together with the area designated as Priority Resource under
State Planning Policy 2.4.
Accompanying the Part 5 provisions will be a Schedule in DPS
2 which will contain the provisions relating to the Landscape Enhancement Zone
Special Control Area and to any further special control areas that may be
introduced in future.
Modification of the Scheme Map
The Amendment proposes to rezone lots within Carabooda and
Nowergup that are currently zoned ‘Rural Resource’ and
‘General Rural’ to Landscape Enhancement (refer Attachment 2).
The area to be rezoned has been determined based on:
· The
indicative “landscape/rural small lot subdivision boundary” set by
the WAPC through ‘The Future of East Wanneroo’ report;
· The
topography of the area to capture the valley and its ridgelines;
· Respecting
existing lot boundaries; and
· Excluding
areas of land identified as priority resource areas under State Planning Policy
2.4.
The
Amendment excludes Lot 5838 (414) Karoborup Road, Carabooda and Lot 2 (27)
Bailey Road, Carabooda which are zoned ‘Private Clubs and
Recreation’. The landowner has requested the continuation of the existing
‘Private Clubs and Recreation’ zone and land use permissibility.
Proposed Local Planning
Policy
To complement the proposed
Scheme Amendment, it is also proposed that a Local Planning Policy be
introduced to expand and elaborate on the proposed Scheme provisions and
provide more detailed guidance for the assessment and determination of
subdivision and development proposals in the Landscape Enhancement Zone, and
the exercise of discretion in respect of those proposals. Preparation of this
Local Planning Policy will be undertaken whilst the Scheme Amendment is being
progressed.
The Local Planning Policy will cover (but will not be
limited to) the following key issues:
· Precinct
boundaries;
· Expansion
and elaboration of the draft Scheme text provisions;
· Detailed
requirements for Subdivision, Development and Structure Plans; and
· Environmental
Management Plans and requirements.
Consultation
An information session on the proposed Amendment was held
with the local community on 7 June 2011. Information was presented by the
Director Planning and Sustainability and a series of questions and comments were
raised. In light of the comments and feedback received at the information
session, Administration revised the draft Amendment and presented this revised
proposal to another information session on 16 August 2011.
In order to overcome the Minister’s reasons for
refusal to advertise Amendment No. 108, the boundary and application of
Amendment No. 108 has been reduced and now applies to a smaller geographic
area. Therefore, not all landowners who were previously included in Amendment
No. 108 are included in Amendment No. 121. It was also clear from both
information sessions that many landowners support the initiation of Amendment
No. 121.
If agreed by Council, the proposed Amendment will need to be
forwarded to the EPA for comment, pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and
Development Act 2005. Subject to no objections being received from the EPA, the
Amendment will be advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days. There
is no requirement to seek the consent of the Minister to advertise the proposed
Amendment as it is consistent with State Policy.
Advertising will be undertaken in the following manner,
consistent with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations 1967:
· Advertisement
in a local newspaper for two consecutive weeks;
· Notices
sent to landowners affected by the proposal;
· Placement
of a sign on site giving notice of the proposal; and
· Display
on the City’s website.
Comment
Amendment No. 121 has been
deliberately constructed to address and overcome the Minister’s reasons
for refusing to progress Amendment No. 108. Set out below is an explanation of
how Amendment No. 121 addresses the Minister’s four reasons for refusal
of Amendment No. 108.
1. Contrary
to State Planning Policy 2.4 Basic Raw Materials.
Amendment No.
121 excludes land identified as a priority resource in State Planning Policy
No. 2.4, thus avoiding any conflict with that Policy. The Amendment also
introduces a Special Control Area that will exclude sensitive land uses from
being located within 300 metres of designated priority resource areas, than
what are already permitted in the Rural Resource zone. As the proposed
Landscape Enhancement zone is now consistent with the WAPC Basic Raw Materials
State Planning Policy No. 2.4, the consent of the Minister will not be required
to advertise the proposed Amendment.
2. Inconsistent
with the ‘Rural’ zoning of the land in the Metropolitan Region
Scheme and the long term policy intentions are not supported by local structure
planning for the Carabooda Nowergup localities.
Contrary to this
reason for refusal, neither Amendment No. 108 nor Amendment No. 121 are
inconsistent with the Rural zone under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS).
The proposed Landscape Enhancement zone is entirely consistent and compatible
with the ‘Rural’ zone in the MRS and with the many zones that exist
in the ‘Rural’ zone under other local government planning schemes.
Section 7 of The Future of East
Wanneroo Report notes that ‘as there are no MRS amendments required for
the proposal of rural small lot subdivision areas shown on Figure 5,
recommendations may be initiated by the City via local structure planning and
local planning scheme amendments’ (p. 28). This statement by the WAPC
indicates that rural small lot subdivision is compatible with the
‘Rural’ zoning under the MRS and therefore contradicts this reason
for refusal. This is reinforced by the diversity of rural zones in the City and
across the metropolitan area that collectively apply and allow for a broad
range of lot sizes and land uses.
In the orderly
and proper planning process, structure planning typically follows rezoning,
rather than as a precursor to rezoning. It is therefore somewhat perplexing
that the Minister/WAPC would require detailed structure planning to occur prior
to any rezoning even being advertised.
If this reason for refusal of
Amendment No. 108 was in any way based on the fact that the WAPC’s final
East Wanneroo Structure Plan (EWSP) had not been released at the time of the
Minister’s decision, then that is no longer a relevant consideration,
given that (firstly) the WAPC released the EWSP earlier this year, and
(secondly) that the EWSP does not extend to the area covered by the proposed
Landscape Enhancement zone. Consequently (and in the absence of any clear
advice from the WAPC distancing itself from its own past report), the ‘Future
of East Wanneroo’ report must still apply to the subject area. In
this regard, it cannot be ignored that both Amendment No. 108 and now Amendment
No. 121 have been prepared in direct response to recommendation 6.4 of that
report.
Furthermore, if the Minister were
concerned about subdivision being permitted without the guidance that might
otherwise be provided by a structure plan, then Amendment No. 121 proposes to
maintain the existing minimum lot size(s) that apply to the Rural Resource and
General Rural zones as stated in Council’s Subdivision of Rural Zoned
Land Policy (July 2000). Amendment No. 121 would see the continuation of the
subdivision potential which already exists in the Rural Resource and General Rural
zones for the Landscape Enhancement zone.
In the Officer’s Report to
the Statutory Planning Committee on Amendment No. 108, it is stated that
‘there has been a consistent ‘robust’ planning framework for
consideration of subdivision into the ‘Rural’ and ‘Rural
Resource’ zones’. As Amendment No. 121 includes the minimum lot
size provisions as specified in Council’s Subdivision of Rural Zoned Land
Policy, there is no reason as to why the WAPC should require structure planning
for the locality given that it has made its decision on subdivisions in the
same area without this requirement and with reliance on the Local Planning
Policy.
This reason for refusal of
Amendment No. 108 could have easily been overcome by modification of the
Amendment and is not considered to be a valid reason for not even allowing
advertising of that Amendment.
Amendment No. 121 will avoid this
situation from reoccurring, as Council will now have the statutory right to
proceed directly to advertising Amendment No. 121 once advice has been received
from the EPA, without the need to refer to the Minister for Planning.
3. Premature
in the absence of structure planning and strategic planning for the area.
The proposed Amendment is
consistent with state and local planning policy and strategy.
In the Officer’s Report to
the Statutory Planning Committee on Amendment No. 108, the Report incorrectly
described the land subject to the Amendment as being designated as ‘Basic
Raw Materials’ in the North West Corridor Structure Plan (1992) (NWCSP).
The NWCSP identifies parts of Carabooda and Nowergup that are subject to
Amendment No. 121, and previous Amendment No. 108, as a ‘Landscape
Protection Zone’. This inaccuracy is a significant concern.
Amendment No. 121 has been
prepared in direct response to Recommendation 6.4 of the WAPC’s own
‘The Future of East Wanneroo’ Report. The areas that form part of
Amendment No. 121 have been identified from the Landscape Character Assessment
Study (2004), prepared as input to The Future of East Wanneroo Report, as requiring
protection and enhancement.
The Amendment is also consistent
with the City’s Landscape Enhancement Areas Policy (1999), Interim Local
Rural Strategy (2000) and Subdivision of Rural Zoned Land Policy (2000).
As noted above, in the Officer’s
Report to the Statutory Planning Committee on Amendment No. 108, it is stated
that ‘there has been a consistent ‘robust’ planning framework
for consideration of subdivision in the ‘Rural’ and ‘Rural
Resource’ zones’. For the Minister to claim that Amendment No. 108
was premature in the absence of structure planning and strategic planning for
the area is inappropriate given that ample strategic planning has already been
undertaken for the areas subject to the proposed Amendment at a regional level.
Furthermore, the WAPC has made its decisions on subdivision applications within
the City relying on the existing planning framework.
Furthermore, given that the WAPC
in The Future of East Wanneroo Report recommended the initiation of a local
planning scheme amendment as a way of implementing the recommendations for
introducing rural small lot subdivision, this reason for refusal is
contradictory with the WAPC’s own advice and is not considered relevant.
4. Introduces
a range of discretionary and prohibited uses considered inappropriate in this
area in the context of the ‘Rural’ zoning of the land under the MRS
and the existing intensive agricultural uses and extractive industry operating
in Carabooda and Nowergup.
As
the proposed Landscape Enhancement zone boundary now applies to a smaller
geographic area, there is no longer a significant presence of intensive
agricultural uses as many of these uses occur further east, outside of the
Amendment area. The agricultural uses that operate in the Amendment area are
confined to the south west and north east of Karoborup Road and north west and
north east of Bernard Road.
The Landscape Enhancement Zone is
intended to accommodate rural residential development, agricultural and
horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism activities.
The existing Scheme provisions and
the proposed provisions accompanying Amendment No. 121 are robust enough to
ensure that any applications for subdivision or development will be compatible
with surrounding land uses and preserve the rural character of the area.
The issue of existing extractive
industry uses operating in the Amendment area has been addressed as a 300 metre
separation distance from land identified for Basic Raw Materials has been
applied in the form of a Special Control Area. This will restrict land uses to
those that are currently permissible within the Rural Resource zone, except for
extractive industry, which would be prohibited. Effectively no additional uses
will be permissible in this area. This will ensure that uses within the 300
metre separation distance are compatible with the future extraction priority
resource areas.
The
Landscape Enhancement zone unaffected by the Special Control Area prohibits
extractive industries and allows for those uses that will contribute to
landscape enhancement and protection, and accommodate rural residential
development, agricultural and horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism
activities.
Statutory
Compliance
The Town Planning Regulations 1967 provide that where an
amendment is consistent with the Metropolitan Region Scheme and State policies
and strategies, the consent of the Minister will not be required to advertise
the amendment. In this instance, the proposed Landscape Enhancement Zone is
entirely consistent with the WAPC Basic Raw Materials State Planning Policy No.
2.4 and other State Policy. As a result, the consent of the Minister will not
be required to advertise the proposed amendment to DPS 2.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise
impact of development on the environment”
Policy
Implications
A separate Local Planning Policy will be prepared during the
advertising of the Scheme Amendment to provide more detailed guidance for the
assessment and determination of development proposals in the Landscape
Enhancement Zone area.
Financial
Implications
The cost of advertising the Scheme Amendment can be met from
existing operational budgets.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS
Amendment No. 121 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) Insert
Clause 3.2.5 in the Scheme as follows:
“3.2.5 Where
in Table 1, the permissibility of a use class in the Landscape Enhancement Zone
is nominated by the ‘/’ symbol then –
i) the
first listed use permissibility shall apply to that portion of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone unaffected by a Special Control Area depicted on the Scheme
Map; and
ii) the
second listed use permissibility shall apply to that portion of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone covered by Special Control Area (a) depicted over that zone on
the Scheme Map.”
b) Insert
Clause 5.5 “Special Control Areas” in the Scheme as follows:
“5.5 SPECIAL
CONTROL AREAS
5.5.1 The
following special control areas are shown on the Scheme Map:
(a) Carabooda
Nowergup Special Control Area, and marked as ‘SCA (a)’ on the
Scheme Map.
5.5.2 In
respect of a special control area shown on the Scheme Map, the provisions of
the special control area as contained in Schedule 16 shall apply in addition to
the provisions applying to any underlying zone or reserve and any general
provisions of the Scheme.”
c) Insert
Clause 3.25 “Landscape Enhancement Zone” in the Scheme as follows:
“3.25 LANDSCAPE
ENHANCEMENT ZONE
3.25.1 The
Landscape Enhancement Zone is intended to accommodate rural residential
development, agricultural and horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism
activities. All subdivision and development in the Landscape Enhancement Zone
shall be conducted in a manner that preserves the rural character of land
within this zone.
3.25.2 The objectives of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone are to:
a) Enable
a range of activities and land uses that support the characteristics of the
landscape, including rural residential development, agricultural and
horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism activities.
b) Ensure
that subdivision and development maintains the rural character of the locality
and does not adversely affect the existing landscape and scenic values.
c) Facilitate
subdivision and development that:
(i) Is
compatible with the landscape amenity and rural character of the Zone;
(ii) Will
not have a detrimental impact on sensitive land uses;
(iii) Is
coordinated and compatible with surrounding land parcels; and
(iv) Does
not necessitate the provision of large scale unplanned and uncoordinated
service infrastructure and community services.
d) Encourage
land use and management practices compatible with landscape and environmental
conservation.
e) Encourage
the preservation of vegetation and fauna and the protection of areas of visual
or landscape quality.
3.25.3 When
considering applications for subdivision or for Planning Approval for
development which relate to land which is within the Landscape Enhancement
Zone, Council shall have regard to the objectives set out in Clause 3.25.2 of
the Landscape Enhancement Zone, the relevant matters listed in Clause 6.8 of
the Scheme and to the following:
a)
The minimum lot sizes as shown on the Map in Schedule
17.
b) The
Council shall not support any use or subdivision or zoning that is, or
potentially could be, incompatible with the intent of the Landscape Enhancement
Zone as set out in Clause 3.25.1
c) Council
will not support any proposals that adversely impact on any designated Bush
Forever site, conservation category wetlands and their buffers, important
heritage site and important site of Aboriginal significance.
d) A
person shall not without Planning Approval of the Council remove, cut down, or
damage any vegetation on land within a Landscape Enhancement Zone including
street verges. Where the Council grants approval it may impose a condition
requiring the planting of suitable vegetation at the cost of the applicant.
e) The
subdivider shall ensure that each prospective purchaser of a subdivided lot
acknowledges in writing, at the time of purchase of a lot, the requirements and
provisions of the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act and more specifically the
fact that:
(i) the
Department of Water imposes constraints on the extraction of ground water from
and the use of groundwater on the land.
(ii)
where the lot is within a proclaimed groundwater area it is
unlikely that a licence will be issued for the use of groundwater for amounts
more than 1500m³ per annum, i.e. sufficient for house and domestic garden
requirements and for the irrigation of approximately 0.1 hectare of pasture or
other crops.
f)
The provisions of any Local Planning Policy
relating to the Zone.
3.25.4 Building and
development on a lot, except for fences and firebreaks, must be contained
within a building envelope defined on a plan adopted by Council. Such an
envelope shall accord with any relevant Council Policy and must be located so
as to:
a)
Avoid detrimentally impacting on areas of landscape and
scenic value;
b)
Avoid areas where ground or soil conditions may
inhibit the structural integrity of buildings or cause pollution, erosion or
flooding;
c) Maximise
opportunities for buildings to take advantage of passive solar light; and
d) Maximise
opportunities for efficient effluent disposal.
3.25.5 Notwithstanding
the requirements set out in Clause 3.25.4, Council may at its discretion
approve development outside the building envelope, if it is satisfied that the
amenity of the area, the privacy of adjoining properties, and the landscape or
environment of the area will not be detrimentally affected.”
b) Insert
the Landscape Enhancement Zone in Table 1 (Zoning Table) of the Scheme, with
the corresponding use permissibilities, as listed below:
ZONES
USE CLASSES
|
LANDSCAPE
ENHANCEMENT
|
|
Abattoir
|
X
|
|
Aged or Dependent Persons’ Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Amusement Facility/Parlour
|
X
|
|
Ancillary Accommodation
|
D
|
|
Animal Husbandry
|
D
|
|
Aquaculture
|
D
|
|
Art Gallery
|
D/A
|
|
Auction Room
|
X
|
|
Bakery
|
X
|
|
Bank
|
X
|
|
Beauty Parlour
|
X
|
|
Bed & Breakfast
|
D
|
|
Camping Ground
|
D/A
|
|
Car Park
|
X
|
|
Car Wash
|
X
|
|
Caravan Park
|
D/X
|
|
Caretaker’s Dwelling
|
D/A
|
|
Cattery
|
D
|
|
Child Care Centre
|
X
|
|
Cinema
|
D/X
|
|
Cinema Complex
|
X
|
|
Civic Building
|
D/A
|
|
Club (Non-Residential)
|
X
|
|
Concrete Batching Plant
|
X
|
|
Consulting Room
|
X
|
|
Convenience Store
|
X
|
|
Corner Store
|
D/X
|
|
Costume Hire
|
X
|
|
Department Store
|
X
|
|
Display Home Centre
|
X
|
|
Drive In Theatre
|
X
|
|
Drive –Through Food Outlet
|
X
|
|
Dry Cleaning Premises
|
X
|
|
Education Establishment
|
X
|
|
Equestrian Activity
|
D
|
|
Factory Unit
|
X
|
|
Fuel Depot
|
X
|
|
Funeral Parlour
|
X
|
|
Golf Course
|
D/X
|
|
Grouped Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Hairdresser
|
X
|
|
Hall
|
D/X
|
|
Hardware Store
|
X
|
|
Hire Service
|
X
|
|
Holiday Village/Resort
|
D/X
|
|
Home Business – Cat 1
|
P
|
|
Home Business – Cat 2
|
P
|
|
Home Business – Cat 3
|
D
|
|
Hospital
|
X
|
|
Hotel
|
X
|
|
Industry – Extractive
|
X
|
|
Industry – General
|
X
|
|
Industry – Hazardous
|
X
|
|
Industry – Light
|
X
|
|
Industry – Rural
|
X/P
|
|
Intensive Agriculture
|
P
|
|
Kennels
|
X/D
|
|
Kindergarten
|
X
|
|
Landscape Supplies
|
X
|
|
Laundromat
|
X
|
|
Laundry
|
X
|
|
Liquor Store
|
X
|
|
Lunch Bar
|
X
|
|
Market (Retail)
|
D/X
|
|
Market Garden Sales
|
D
|
|
Mast or Antenna
|
D
|
|
Medical Centre
|
X
|
|
Milk Depot
|
X
|
|
Motel
|
X
|
|
Motor Vehicle Repairs
|
X
|
|
Multiple Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Night Club
|
X
|
|
Nursing Home
|
X
|
|
Office
|
X
|
|
Open Air Display
|
X
|
|
Park
|
D
|
|
Park Home Park
|
X
|
|
Pharmacy
|
X
|
|
Piggery
|
X/D
|
|
Place of Assembly
|
X
|
|
Place of Worship
|
X
|
|
Plant Nursery
|
D
|
|
Private Recreation
|
D/X
|
|
Public Exhibition Facility
|
D/X
|
|
Reception Centre
|
D/X
|
|
Recreation Centre
|
X
|
|
Residential Building
|
X
|
|
Restaurant
|
D/A
|
|
Restricted Premises
|
X
|
|
Retirement Village
|
X
|
|
Road House
|
X
|
|
Roadside Stall
|
P/D
|
|
Rural Use
|
P
|
|
Salvage Yard
|
X
|
|
Service Station
|
X
|
|
Shop
|
X
|
|
Showroom
|
X
|
|
Single House
|
D
|
|
Smash Repair Station
|
X
|
|
Special Place of Assembly
|
X
|
|
Sports Ground
|
X
|
|
Stables
|
D
|
|
Stall – General
|
D/X
|
|
Storage Yard
|
X
|
|
Supermarket
|
X
|
|
Take-Away Food Outlet
|
X
|
|
Tavern
|
D/X
|
|
Telecommunications Infrastructure
|
D
|
|
Theatre
|
X
|
|
Trade Display
|
D/X
|
|
Transport Depot
|
X
|
|
Vehicle Sales/Hire Premises
|
X
|
|
Vehicle Wrecking
|
X
|
|
Veterinary Consulting Rooms
|
X
|
|
Veterinary Hospital
|
X/A
|
|
Video Hire
|
X
|
|
Warehouse
|
X
|
|
Winery
|
D
|
|
Woodyard
|
X
|
c) Insert
Schedule 16 “Special Control Areas” in the Scheme as follows:
|
SPECIAL CONTROL AREA
|
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
|
|
SCA (a) Carabooda Nowergup
|
1. Land
use permissibility within this Special Control Area is subject to Clause
3.2.5 of the Scheme.
|
d) Insert
Schedule 17 “Carabooda Nowergup Landscape Enhancement Zone Minimum Lot
Sizes” in the Scheme as follows:
1.
INTRODUCTION
For
the purpose of setting out minimum lot sizes in the Carabooda Nowergup
Landscape Enhancement Zone, Map 1 set out in this Schedule shall
apply.
MAP
1
e) Apply
the Landscape Enhancement Zone and Special Control Area as shown on the Scheme
(Amendment) Map as contained in Attachment 2; and
2. FORWARDS
Amendment No. 121 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:
a) The
Environmental Protection Authority for comment pursuant to Section 81 of the
Planning and Development Act 2005;
b) The
Western Australian Planning Commission for information, and
3. Subject
to no objections being received from the Environmental Protection Authority,
ADVERTISES Amendment No. 121 for public comment pursuant to Regulation 25(2) of
the Town Planning Regulations 1967 for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1: Draft DPS 2 Text Landscape Enhancement
Zone
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2: Draft Scheme Amendment Map
|
11/60209
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3: Comparison of Previous and Prososed
Amendment to DPS 2
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 25
DRAFT
DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO. 2 TEXT
3.2.5 Where
in Table 1, the permissibility of a use class in the Landscape Enhancement Zone
is nominated by the ‘/’ symbol then –
i) the
first listed use permissibility shall apply to that portion of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone unaffected by a Special Control Area depicted on the Scheme
Map; and
ii) the
second listed use permissibility shall apply to that portion of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone covered by Special Control Area (a) depicted over that zone on
the Scheme Map.
5.5 SPECIAL
CONTROL AREAS
5.5.1 The
following special control areas are shown on the Scheme Map:
(a) Carabooda
Nowergup Special Control Area, and marked as ‘SCA (a)’ on the
Scheme Map.
5.5.2 In
respect of a special control area shown on the Scheme Map, the provisions of
the special control area as contained in Schedule 16 shall apply in addition to
the provisions applying to any underlying zone or reserve and any general
provisions of the Scheme.
3.25 LANDSCAPE
ENHANCEMENT ZONE
3.25.1 The Landscape
Enhancement Zone is intended to accommodate rural residential development,
agricultural and horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism activities.
All subdivision and development in the Landscape Enhancement Zone shall be
conducted in a manner that preserves the rural character of land within this
zone.
3.25.2 The objectives of the Landscape
Enhancement Zone are to:
a) Enable
a range of activities and land uses that support the characteristics of the
landscape, including rural residential development, agricultural and
horticultural land uses, and small-scale tourism activities.
b) Ensure
that subdivision and development maintains the rural character of the locality
and does not adversely affect the existing landscape and scenic values.
c) Facilitate
subdivision and development that:
(i) Is
compatible with the landscape amenity and rural character of the Zone;
(ii) Will
not have a detrimental impact on sensitive land uses;
(iii) Is
coordinated and compatible with surrounding land parcels; and
(iv) Does
not necessitate the provision of large scale unplanned and uncoordinated service
infrastructure and community services.
d) Encourage
land use and management practices compatible with landscape and environmental
conservation.
e) Encourage
the preservation of vegetation and fauna and the protection of areas of visual
or landscape quality.
3.25.3 When
considering applications for subdivision or for Planning Approval for
development which relate to land which is within the Landscape Enhancement
Zone, Council shall have regard to the objectives set out in Clause 3.25.2 of
the Landscape Enhancement Zone, the relevant matters listed in Clause 6.8 of
the Scheme and to the following:
a) The
minimum lot sizes as shown on the Map in Schedule 17.
b)
The Council shall not support any use or subdivision
or zoning that is, or potentially could be, incompatible with the intent of the
Landscape Enhancement Zone as set out in Clause 3.25.1
c) Council
will not support any proposals that adversely impact on any designated Bush
Forever site, conservation category wetlands and their buffers, important
heritage site and important site of Aboriginal significance.
d) A
person shall not without Planning Approval of the Council remove, cut down, or
damage any vegetation on land within a Landscape Enhancement Zone including
street verges. Where the Council grants approval it may impose a condition
requiring the planting of suitable vegetation at the cost of the applicant.
e) The
subdivider shall ensure that each prospective purchaser of a subdivided lot
acknowledges in writing, at the time of purchase of a lot, the requirements and
provisions of the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act and more specifically the
fact that:
(i) the
Department of Water imposes constraints on the extraction of ground water from
and the use of groundwater on the land.
(ii)
where the lot is within a proclaimed groundwater area
it is unlikely that a licence will be issued for the use of groundwater for
amounts more than 1500m³ per annum, i.e. sufficient for house and domestic
garden requirements and for the irrigation of approximately 0.1 hectare of
pasture or other crops.
f)
The provisions of any Local Planning Policy
relating to the Zone.
3.25.4 Building and
development on a lot, except for fences and firebreaks, must be contained
within a building envelope defined on a plan adopted by Council. Such an
envelope shall accord with any relevant Council Policy and must be located so
as to:
a)
Avoid detrimentally impacting on areas of landscape
and scenic value;
b)
Avoid areas where ground or soil conditions may inhibit
the structural integrity of buildings or cause pollution, erosion or flooding;
c) Maximise
opportunities for buildings to take advantage of passive solar light; and
d) Maximise
opportunities for efficient effluent disposal.
3.25.5 Notwithstanding the requirements
set out in Clause 3.25.4, Council may at its discretion approve development
outside the building envelope, if it is satisfied that the amenity of the area,
the privacy of adjoining properties, and the landscape or environment of the
area will not be detrimentally affected.
TABLE 1 (CLAUSE 3.2)
– THE ZONING TABLE
ZONES
USE CLASSES
|
LANDSCAPE
ENHANCEMENT
|
|
Abattoir
|
X
|
|
Aged or Dependent Persons’ Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Amusement Facility/Parlour
|
X
|
|
Ancillary Accommodation
|
D
|
|
Animal Husbandry
|
D
|
|
Aquaculture
|
D
|
|
Art Gallery
|
D/A
|
|
Auction Room
|
X
|
|
Bakery
|
X
|
|
Bank
|
X
|
|
Beauty Parlour
|
X
|
|
Bed & Breakfast
|
D
|
|
Camping Ground
|
D/A
|
|
Car Park
|
X
|
|
Car Wash
|
X
|
|
Caravan Park
|
D/X
|
|
Caretaker’s Dwelling
|
D/A
|
|
Cattery
|
D
|
|
Child Care Centre
|
X
|
|
Cinema
|
D/X
|
|
Cinema Complex
|
X
|
|
Civic Building
|
D/A
|
|
Club (Non-Residential)
|
X
|
|
Concrete Batching Plant
|
X
|
|
Consulting Room
|
X
|
|
Convenience Store
|
X
|
|
Corner Store
|
D/X
|
|
Costume Hire
|
X
|
|
Department Store
|
X
|
|
Display Home Centre
|
X
|
|
Drive In Theatre
|
X
|
|
Drive –Through Food Outlet
|
X
|
|
Dry Cleaning Premises
|
X
|
|
Education Establishment
|
X
|
|
Equestrian Activity
|
D
|
|
Factory Unit
|
X
|
|
Fuel Depot
|
X
|
|
Funeral Parlour
|
X
|
|
Golf Course
|
D/X
|
|
Grouped Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Hairdresser
|
X
|
|
Hall
|
D/X
|
|
Hardware Store
|
X
|
|
Hire Service
|
X
|
|
Holiday Village/Resort
|
D/X
|
|
Home Business – Cat 1
|
P
|
|
Home Business – Cat 2
|
P
|
|
Home Business – Cat 3
|
D
|
|
Hospital
|
X
|
|
Hotel
|
X
|
|
Industry – Extractive
|
X
|
|
Industry – General
|
X
|
|
Industry – Hazardous
|
X
|
|
Industry – Light
|
X
|
|
Industry – Rural
|
X/P
|
|
Intensive Agriculture
|
P
|
|
Kennels
|
X/D
|
|
Kindergarten
|
X
|
|
Landscape Supplies
|
X
|
|
Laundromat
|
X
|
|
Laundry
|
X
|
|
Liquor Store
|
X
|
|
Lunch Bar
|
X
|
|
Market (Retail)
|
D/X
|
|
Market Garden Sales
|
D
|
|
Mast or Antenna
|
D
|
|
Medical Centre
|
X
|
|
Milk Depot
|
X
|
|
Motel
|
X
|
|
Motor Vehicle Repairs
|
X
|
|
Multiple Dwelling
|
X
|
|
Night Club
|
X
|
|
Nursing Home
|
X
|
|
Office
|
X
|
|
Open Air Display
|
X
|
|
Park
|
D
|
|
Park Home Park
|
X
|
|
Pharmacy
|
X
|
|
Piggery
|
X/D
|
|
Place of Assembly
|
X
|
|
Place of Worship
|
X
|
|
Plant Nursery
|
D
|
|
Private Recreation
|
D/X
|
|
Public Exhibition Facility
|
D/X
|
|
Reception Centre
|
D/X
|
|
Recreation Centre
|
X
|
|
Residential Building
|
X
|
|
Restaurant
|
D/A
|
|
Restricted Premises
|
X
|
|
Retirement Village
|
X
|
|
Road House
|
X
|
|
Roadside Stall
|
P/D
|
|
Rural Use
|
P
|
|
Salvage Yard
|
X
|
|
Service Station
|
X
|
|
Shop
|
X
|
|
Showroom
|
X
|
|
Single House
|
D
|
|
Smash Repair Station
|
X
|
|
Special Place of Assembly
|
X
|
|
Sports Ground
|
X
|
|
Stables
|
D
|
|
Stall – General
|
D/X
|
|
Storage Yard
|
X
|
|
Supermarket
|
X
|
|
Take-Away Food Outlet
|
X
|
|
Tavern
|
D/X
|
|
Telecommunications Infrastructure
|
D
|
|
Theatre
|
X
|
|
Trade Display
|
D/X
|
|
Transport Depot
|
X
|
|
Vehicle Sales/Hire Premises
|
X
|
|
Vehicle Wrecking
|
X
|
|
Veterinary Consulting Rooms
|
X
|
|
Veterinary Hospital
|
X/A
|
|
Video Hire
|
X
|
|
Warehouse
|
X
|
|
Winery
|
D
|
|
Woodyard
|
X
|
SCHEDULE 16 (CLAUSE 5.5) – SPECIAL CONTROL AREAS
|
SPECIAL CONTROL AREA
|
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
|
|
SCA (a) Carabooda Nowergup
|
1. Land
use permissibility within this Special Control Area is subject to Clause
3.2.5 of the Scheme.
|
SCHEDULE 17 (CLAUSE 3.25) – CARABOODA NOWERGUP
LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT ZONE MINIMUM LOT SIZES
1. INTRODUCTION
For the purpose of
setting out minimum lot sizes in the Carabooda Nowergup Landscape Enhancement
Zone, Map 1 set out in this Schedule shall apply.
MAP 1
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 34
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 35
PS03-10/11 Adoption
of Amendment No. 35 to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Agreed Structure Plan No. 8
File Ref: 3381-35
– 11/102471
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider submissions received during public advertising
of Amendment No. 35 to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Agreed Structure Plan No. 8
(ASP 8) and adoption of the amendment.
|
Applicant
|
Masterplan Consultants WA Pty Ltd
|
|
Owner
|
Tripoint Holdings Pty Ltd
|
|
Location
|
Lot 501 (2) Skeit Road, Darch
|
|
Site Area
|
4,762m2
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
|
ASP 8 Zoning
|
Residential Precinct (R20)
|
Background
On 7 April 2011, the City received a request to amend ASP 8
by recoding Lot 501 Skeit Road, Darch from Residential R20 (R20) to Residential
R40 (R40). As per Council records the subject land is under the ownership of
“State of Western Australia”. The applicant has advised that the
land has since been purchased by Tripoint Holdings Pty Ltd and has provided a
Record of Certificate of Title as proof of ownership.
On 21 June 2011, the Director, Planning and Sustainability
forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for
members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to
advertise. No such requests were received and, as such, advertising of the
amendment proposal commenced in accordance with Clause 9.5 of District Planning
Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Detail
The Site
Attachment 1 contains the
site plan. The triangular shaped site is located at the immediate south-eastern
corner of Hartman Drive and Kingsway but gains access from Skeit Road, which is
disconnected at the Kingsway end. Attachment 2 contains a copy of
the structure plan map of ASP 8 depicting the site.
The Proposal
The proposed R40 coding will
allow the developer to undertake either a grouped or a multiple dwelling
development on the subject land. The development will gain access from Skeit
Road only and not from Hartman Drive or Kingsway. At the
subdivision/development stage necessary provision will be made to restrict
vehicular access onto Hartman Drive and Kingsway. The applicant has also
advised that, if required by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)
through the subdivision process, appropriate noise remediation measures may be
undertaken along the boundary with Hartman Drive to address the noise generated
by the vehicle traffic.
The site contains 26 trees. The
developer proposes to remove 13 of the trees and retain 13 trees.
The applicant has provided the
following justification to the proposal:
· The
awkward shape of the site compromises the ability to undertake an R20 density
development, which could create either a series of battleaxe lots or narrow and
deep lots. An R20 development would yield nine lots;
· An
R40 development will create regular shaped smaller survey strata lots, which
will be suitable for custom designed built products; and
· The
site is located on a bus route along Kingsway and is in close proximity to the
Ashdale Shopping Centre, schools and Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex.
Consultation
The Amendment proposal was advertised for public comment for
a period of 42 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the
Wanneroo Times newspaper, a notice on the City’s website and letters to
adjoining and affected landowners. The submission period commenced on 26 July
and closed on 6 September 2011. The City received 31 submissions from the
public and government agencies of which 30 supported the proposal and one
raised an objection to the proposal. The Department of Planning, the Department
of Indigenous Affairs, Main Roads Western Australia and the Department of
Environment and Conservation did not raise any objection to the proposal. One
of the submissions supporting the proposal enclosed an 81-signature petition
supporting the proposal. Those who supported the proposal do not live on Skeit
Road but in the vicinity of the subject site.
The submission objecting to the proposal also included a
7-signature petition. The objector and the petitioners live on Skeit Road
opposite the amendment area. The main issues raised in the submission and the
petition relate to:
· Retention
of trees;
· Increase
in the volume of traffic; and
· Devaluation
of properties on Skeit Road.
A summary of all the submissions received and
Administration’s responses are shown in Attachment 3.
Comment
The proposal
The site originally formed part of the Kingsway Regional
Reserve. As a result of the construction of Hartman Drive as per the provisions
of ASP 8, the subject land was separated from the Regional Reserve and zoned
Residential Precinct with a density code of R20 in ASP 8. There are 26 trees
located on the site along the eastern boundary. It is proposed to retain 13
trees and remove 13 trees (refer Attachment 4). The trees are of a Ficus
species and vary in height between 6 to 14 metres.
City’s Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing
Strategy Implementation
Section 9.1 of the City’s Local Planning Policy 3.1:
Local Housing Strategy Implementation (LPP 3.1) states that where applications
are made seeking an increase in R Coding of land, which is outside the Housing
Precincts designated under this policy and where the land concerned is subject
to an ASP, the ASP amendment application must include an assessment of how the
proposal:
i) Is
appropriate within the broader planning framework provided by the structure
plan;
ii) Satisfies
the criteria of this policy relating to Housing Precinct designation and
densities; and
iii) More
generally supports the objectives and recommendations of the City’s Local
Housing Strategy and the Smart Growth Strategy.
The above matters are discussed below.
i) The
criteria for designation of Housing Precinct boundaries and proposed
residential densities and the relevant policy application as per LPP 3.1, and
Administration’s comments on how the applicant has satisfied these
criteria, are provided in the following Table:
|
No.
|
Criterion Detail
|
Policy Application
|
Comment
|
|
1.
|
Easy access/close proximity to retail and employment
centres
|
R40 between 400m and 800m of neighbourhood centre
|
Ashdale Shopping Centre is located about 600 metres to the
east of the amendment area.
|
|
2.
|
Easy access/close proximity to public transport with
priority towards rail nodes and bus interchange
|
R40 within 250m of main bus route.
|
Kingsway is a Transperth bus route.
|
|
3.
|
Easy access/close to areas of high amenity including
public open space and recreational facilities
|
R40 within 250m of District public open space
|
The site is located opposite Kingsway District Sporting
Complex
|
|
4.
|
Easy access/close proximity to major arterial routes,
educational institutions and community facilities
|
This criterion is not applied spatially but rather the
area concerned has been assessed in general terms regarding adequacy of
arterial routes, educational institutions and community facilities serving
the area to cope with increased population and traffic arising from increased
densities
|
The site is
located near Kingsway College and a Government High School.
The
proposal will yield approximately 19 dwellings generating 190 vehicles per
day. The suburb of Darch within which the site is located being generally
developed to an extent of about 80%, the additional traffic generated by the
subject proposal is not likely to impact on the movement of traffic in this
area.
|
ii) The
proposal to recode the subject land to R40 wherein the average lot size is 220m2
in area as per the WAPC’s Residential Design Codes, generally satisfies
the following objectives of the City‘s Housing Strategy:
· To
ensure that an adequate supply of affordable housing is provided particularly
for first home buyers; and
· Promote
appropriate forms of housing close to existing and proposed community
facilities and services to enable more efficient and effective use of those
facilities and services.
iii) The
proposal also generally satisfies the following Smart Growth Strategy
principles:
· Promoting
a range of lot sizes to cater for different lifestyle choices; and
· Promoting
a range of housing types in appropriate locations to meet current and future
market demands.
Conclusion
The proposal to recode Lot 501 Skeit Road, Darch from
Residential R20 to Residential R40 satisfies the City’s LPP 3.1: Local
Housing Strategy Implementation. It is therefore recommended that under the
provisions of Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2, the amendment proposal be considered
satisfactory and forwarded to the WAPC for its adoption and certification.
Statutory Compliance
This amendment proposal has been processed in accordance
with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that
following advertisement of a Structure Plan amendment, Council may refuse to
adopt the amendment or resolve that the amendment is satisfactory with or
without modifications. It is recommended that Amendment No. 35 to ASP 8 be
approved without modifications.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
Policy Implications
The proposal satisfies the City’s LPP 3.1: Local
Housing Strategy Implementation as discussed in the Comment section of this
report.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES
that Amendment No. 35 to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Agreed Structure Plan No. 8,
as submitted by Masterplan Consultants WA Pty Ltd on behalf of Tripoint
Holdings Pty Ltd to recode Lot 501 (2) Skeit Road, Darch from
Residential R20 to R40 is satisfactory without modifications and SUBMITS three
copies to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and
certification;
2. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS
Amendment No. 35 to the East Wanneroo Cell 6 Agreed Structure Plan No. 8 and
AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL the documents
once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
3. ENDORSES
Administration’s comments in response to the submissions received on this
Structure Plan Amendment for inclusion in the schedule of submissions to be
forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the
submittors of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 - Amdt 35 to ASP 8 - Lot 501 (2)
Skeit Road LG scale
|
11/105790
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Amdt 35 to ASP 8 - Lot 501 (2) Skeit
Road
|
11/111981
|
|
|
3.
|
Amdt No. 35 to ASP 8 - Attachment 3SCAN8398_000
|
11/109112
|
|
|
4.
|
Amdt No. 35 to ASP 8 - Attachment 4
|
11/106332
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 41
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 42
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 43
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 47
PS04-10/11 Amendment
No. 1 to Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
File Ref: 4528-1
– 11/105837
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider advertising of the modified Amendment No. 1 to
the Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21 A (ASP 21A) lodged by Chappell
Lambert Everett Town Planning and Urban Design on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees.
|
Applicant
|
Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners
|
|
Owner
|
Housing Authority
|
|
Location
|
Lot 9126 (131) Flynn Drive, Banksia Grove
|
|
Site Area
|
Approximately 136 hectares (ha)
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development
|
|
ASP 21A Zoning
|
Residential, Commercial, Mixed Use and Civic &
Cultural
|
Background
Council at its meeting of 26 July 2011 (Item PS01-07/11)
considered Amendment No. 1 to ASP 21A and resolved as follows:
“That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clause 9.4.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2, DETERMINES that the
proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees and included as Attachment 2, is satisfactory for the purposes of
advertising; and
2. ADVERTISES
proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees and included as Attachment 2, for a period of 42 days, subject to the
“Primary School (4ha)” notation in the north-eastern portion of the
proposed (amendment) structure plan Map 1, being altered to refer to a
“minimum 3.5ha Primary School site and 1.5ha adjacent Public Open Space
site”, together with any consequential alteration(s) required to the
amendment text also being made to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and
Sustainability.”
It is proposed to amend the Local Structure Plan map, Zoning
Plan and Residential Density Code (R-Code) Plan in order to:
· Relocate
the eastern Primary School (PS) site closer to the eastern boundary of the
structure plan area;
· Consolidate
the middle and the eastern local centres into one local centre and to locate it
adjacent to the relocated PS site to create a new focal point;
· Depict
the land use to the west of Glasshouse Drive from Commercial to Mixed Use; and
· Allocate
a R30/R60 coding over the entire north-eastern section of the ASP 21A area.
Detail
Attachment 1 contains the amended Structure Plan,
Zoning Plan and R-Code Plan submitted by the applicant. Attachment 2
contains the concept plan for the PS site and the adjacent Public Open Space
(POS) site.
While Council in July 2011 resolved that the minimum area of
the PS and POS sites was to be 3.5 and 1.5 ha respectively, the concept plan
submitted by the applicant depicts a 3.5 ha PS site and an adjacent 1.2198ha
POS site, representing a reduction of 2,802m2 in the size of the
POS.
The applicant has provided the following justification for
the reduction in the POS site:
· Given
the undulating topography of the north-eastern portion of the structure plan
area the proposed 4.7198ha site is able to be earth-worked to achieve minimal
fall across the site in accordance with the Department of Education
specifications;
· The
proposed site can accommodate a junior oval as well as the associated
facilities such as change rooms and car parking; and
· The
site is well situated within the local road network to provide accessibility
for all modes of transport.
Consultation
Should Council determine that the amendment proposal, as
modified by the applicant, is satisfactory for the purposes of advertising for
public comment, advertising would be carried out in accordance with Clause 9.5
of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). This would include an advertising
period of 42 days as per the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure
Planning by placing an advertisement in a newspaper circulating in the district
and on the City’s website, displaying on-site sign(s) and writing to the
affected landowners adjoining the amendment area.
Comment
Administration has assessed the concept plan for the POS/PS
site and can confirm that it is capable of accommodating a 118m X 84m junior
oval required for the school, change rooms, cricket nets and car parking.
With regard to the 2,802m2 reduction in the POS
site, it is intended that this area be amalgamated with a passive ‘pocket
park(s)’ elsewhere within the structure plan area during the subdivision
stage as part of the minimum 10% POS requirement for the structure plan area.
It is recommended that the modified amendment proposal
submitted by the applicant be advertised for a period of 42 days, as per the
provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning.
Statutory
Compliance
Part 9 of DPS 2 requires that Council determine whether the
proposed ASP Amendment is satisfactory for advertising for public comment. The
four options available to Council are to determine that:
· The
proposal is satisfactory for advertising for public comment;
· The
proposal is not to be advertised for public comment until further details are
provided or modifications undertaken;
· Advertising
of the proposal be waived as it is considered to be of a minor nature which
does not materially alter the intent of the Agreed Structure Plan or cause any
significant detriment to land within or abutting the structure plan area; or
· The
proposal is not satisfactory for advertising for public comment.
The proposed Amendment maintains the intent of
Council’s July 2011 resolution to provide a full-sized primary school
site and adjacent POS area large enough to accommodate a junior playing field
and associated facilities. The amendment is therefore supported by
Administration and recommended to proceed to advertising for public comment.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.1 Increase
choice and quality of neighbourhood and lifestyle options”
Policy
Implications
The proposal has been assessed under and accords with the
provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to
Clause 9.4.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2, DETERMINES that the
modified Amendment No. 1 to the Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees and included as Attachment 1 to this report, is satisfactory for the
purposes of advertising; and
2. ADVERTISES
the modified Amendment No. 1 to the Banksia Grove Agreed Structure Plan No. 21A
submitted by Chappell Lambert Everett Town Planners on behalf of Banksia Grove
Nominees and included as Attachment 1 to this report, for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Amdt 2 to ASP 21A - Attachment 1
|
11/106114
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Amdt 1 to ASP 21A - Attachment 2
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 51
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 54
PS05-10/11 Agreement
of Yanchep City Local Structure Plan No. 68
File Ref: 2959
– 11/105901
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the modifications required by the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to the draft Yanchep City Local Structure
Plan No. 68 (LSP 68), with a view to determining a formal Council position on
these modifications and the Structure Plan’s acceptability for agreement.
|
Applicant
|
Taylor Burrell Barnett on behalf of Yanchep Beach Joint
Venture
|
|
Owner
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture; Peet Limited and the Crown
|
|
Location
|
Lots 602, 609 and 904 Yanchep Beach Road and Lots 603 and
903 Toreopango Avenue, Yanchep
|
|
Site Area
|
Approximately 612 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban, Urban Deferred; Central City Area; Other Regional
Road Reservation; and Railways Reservation
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Urban Development; Service Industrial; and Centre
|
Background
The LSP 68 comprises approximately 612 hectares and is zoned
predominantly ‘Urban Development’ in District Planning Scheme No. 2
(DPS 2), with a portion of the site zoned ‘Centre’ and a minor
portion zoned ‘Service Industrial’. LSP 68 falls within the wider
Yanchep-Two Rock Agreed District Structure Plan area and is bounded generally
by Yanchep Beach Road in the south, the Mitchell Freeway Reserve in the east,
and the Marmion Avenue extension in the west. The northern boundary is
established by Crown land reserved for Bush Forever and private landholdings
held by Tokyu Corporation. The location of LSP 68 is illustrated in
Attachment 1.
The proposed LSP provides a mixture of commercial, retail,
entertainment, hospitality, residential, education and community oriented uses.
These include the identification of sites for the following key land use
outcomes:
· Approximately
8,500 dwellings, delivering an approximate population of 20,000;
· A
Centre Zone covering the Yanchep Strategic Metropolitan City Centre core,
requiring a separate structure plan to be prepared for this area;
· The
alignment of the northern suburbs railway;
· A
railway station located at the centre of the Yanchep Strategic Metropolitan
City Centre core;
· A
Transit Boulevard running north from Toreopango Avenue and ultimately
connecting to Two Rocks;
· A
fixed public transport route (bus/light rail) connecting the railway station to
the Transit Boulevard;
· A
service industry area north of Toreopango Avenue and east of the northern
suburbs railway;
· A
mixed use/business area west of the City Centre core;
· Mixed
use/business corridors along Toreopango Avenue, Marmion Avenue, Yanchep Beach
Road and the Transit Boulevard;
· A
special use employment precinct south of the City Centre core;
· Two
universities;
· Two
TAFEs;
· A
public high school
· A
private ‘kindergarten to year 12’ school;
· Three
primary schools; and
· 75
hectares of public open space and land for drainage.
A copy of the LSP 68 Master Plan is included as Attachment
2 to this report.
LSP 68 was advertised for 42 days in October, November and
December 2009, with the submission period closing on 7 December 2009. At
its 9 February 2010 meeting Council resolved that LSP 68 was satisfactory,
subject to modifications, and resolved to refer LSP 68 to the WAPC for approval
(PS01-02/10). On 15 February 2010 the advertised version of LSP 68, along with
a list of the modifications required by Council, was sent to the WAPC for
approval. A copy of the LSP 68 Part 1 Statutory Section that was
advertised for public comment and forwarded to the WAPC is included as Attachment
3.
On 4 August 2011 the WAPC wrote to the City informing that
it had resolved to endorse LSP 68, subject to various modifications being made.
Since then, Administration has been consulting with the proponent of LSP 68 and
the Department of Planning regarding these modifications.
Establishing a formal Council position on the WAPC’s
required modifications will enable finalisation and agreement of LSP 68.
Detail
Administration considers that all of the WAPC’s
required modifications are of a minor nature and do not significantly or
materially depart from the advertised version of LSP 68. Attachment 4
lists the WAPC’s required modifications as well as Administration’s
comment on each. The majority of the WAPC’s modifications relate to
editorial changes that clarify references within the document and the planning
process that will follow on from LSP 68. However, the following
modifications required by the WAPC do affect the statutory provisions of LSP
68:
· Replacement
of residential density provisions with residential design code ranges and
variations;
· Removal
of requirements for a Local Water Management Strategy and Vegetation and Fauna
Management Strategy as a condition of approval of LSP 68; and Karst Management
Plans as a condition of subdivision in areas where karst is present;
· Removal
of a maximum retail net lettable area for the ‘Centre’ zoned area;
· The
inclusion of specified instances where detailed area plans are to be provided
as a condition of subdivision;
· Replacement
of the ‘Business’ zone proposed along Toreopango Avenue and the
District Distributor to the north of Toreopango Avenue with ‘Mixed
Use’ zone.
The above modifications required by the WAPC are discussed
in more detail in the Comment section below.
Comment
Residential Density
The WAPC’s required modifications replaced the density
provisions of LSP 68 with a set of density ranges, illustrated in the Structure
Plan Map included in Attachment 4, and also allowed variations to the
Residential Design Code provisions to be included in LSP 68.
The density ranges proposed are generally consistent with
those required by Council, however, a new R10-R20 area is included to allow for
vegetation retention along the eastern boundary of the Sun City Country Club.
The application of these low density residential design codes is supported for
areas where vegetation retention is proposed, however, the extent of this low
density area is considered too extensive in a location that is less than 1500m
from the Yanchep City Strategic Metropolitan Centre and Yanchep City Railway
Station. It is recommended that this R10-R20 area be reduced to include only
the areas where vegetation retention is proposed along the boundary of the Sun
City Country Club, and the remainder of the R10-R20 area be shown as R20-R60.
The inclusion of residential design code variations in
structure plans is supported by Administration and recommended in the
City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2). The
proponent of LSP 68 has proposed a set of residential design code variations
that relate to front setbacks, maximum wall height, open space requirements,
overshadowing and passive surveillance. The proposed variations are included in
Attachment 4 to this report. All of the variations proposed will allow
for a superior development outcome, except the proposed reduction in the open
space requirement for R20 lots from a minimum of 50% of the site, in the
current Residential Design Codes, to a minimum of 40% of the site. This would
not provide a superior development outcome unless it is offset by a requirement
for a minimum 6m x 4m outdoor living area. Therefore, Administration supports
the proposed variations included in Attachment 4, subject to the
variations to the R20 Open Space Requirements allowing the minimum open space
requirement to be reduced to 40% only where a minimum 6m x 4m outdoor living
area is provided. It is recommended that these variations be included in Part 1
of LSP 68.
Council’s resolution of 9 February 2009 required a minimum
density of R60 for the area within 800m of the Yanchep City Railway Station and
any other constructed railway station; however, the WAPC’s modifications
removed this requirement. This minimum density requirement is essential for
ensuring the provision of appropriate densities, in accordance with the
City’s Housing Strategy and Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure
Plan.
Considering the WAPC has removed the Council’s generic
R60 minimum density requirement for the 800m Railway Station catchment it is
recommended that the minimum density requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks
Agreed District Structure Plan be applied instead. This includes a requirement
for a minimum average density of:
· 50
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the Yanchep City Railway Station
and any other constructed railway station;
· 30
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the district activity centre,
which is located to the south of Yanchep Beach Road; and
· 25
dwellings per site hectare along neighbourhood connectors supporting future
public transport routes;
in accordance with provision 7.6 S1 of the Yanchep-Two Rocks
Agreed District Structure Plan.
Conditional
Requirements for Strategies and Plans
The WAPC’s modifications removed the following
requirements set by Council at its 9 February 2010 meeting (Item PS01-02/10):
· A
Local Water Management Strategy (LWMS) to be approved as a condition of the
proposed LSP prior to subdivision or development of land within the proposed
LSP area;
· A
Vegetation and Fauna Management Strategy (VFMS) to be approved as a condition
of the proposed LSP prior to subdivision or development of land within the
proposed LSP area; and
· A
Karst Management Plan (only where karst is present) to be provided as a
condition of subdivision.
Since the Council resolution of 9 February 2010, a LWMS and
VFMS have been prepared and assessed by Administration. Both of these documents
are considered to be acceptable and it is recommended that they be included as
an appendix to LSP 68, removing the need for these strategies to be required as
a condition of LSP 68.
Karst studies conducted as a part of the Yanchep-Two Rocks
District Structure Plan have confirmed that karstification is present within a
portion of the LSP 68 area. These limestone features have the potential to
impact on the urban land uses proposed in LSP 68, if they are not appropriately
managed. As a result Council required that Karst Management Plans (only where
karst is present) be provided as condition of subdivision, in accordance with
provision 8.0 of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan. It is
therefore recommended that Part 1 of LSP 68 requires a Karst Management Plan
(only where karst is present) as a condition of subdivision to ensure
development in areas affected by karst is managed appropriately.
Maximum Floorspace
Requirements
Through it modifications the WAPC removed the Councils
requirement for a maximum retail net lettable area of 71,800m2 be
set for the LSP 68. Subclause 3.13.5 of DPS 2 requires that “(a)ll
Centre Zones shall specify the proposed maximum retail net lettable area
(NLA) which relates to retail floor areas.” In addition, the Yanchep-Two
Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan sets an indicative retail floorspace of
71,800m2 for the Yanchep City Strategic Metropolitan Centre.
It is therefore recommended that a maximum retail net
lettable area of 71,800m2 be included in Part 1 of LSP 68 for the
‘Centre’ zone, in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2 and
consistent with the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan. The
Department of Planning has provided formal confirmation of its agreement with
this approach.
Detailed Area Plans
The WAPC’s modifications required that Detailed Area
Plans be provided as a condition of subdivision for:
· the
Local Activity Centre;
· lots
within the Mixed Use, Business and Service Industry Zones;
· lots
within the R10 – R20 density range surrounding the Sun City Country Club;
· lots
on which sensitive landuses have been identified within the approved Noise
Assessment Report as requiring specific noise amelioration measures; and
· development
in which interim uses are proposed.
This modification is considered acceptable as it is
consistent with the advertised version of LSP 68 and Council’s resolution
and simply specifies in detail the areas that require detailed area plans as a
condition of subdivision. However, the City’s Structure Planning Local
Planning Policy 4.2 requires Detailed Area Plans for local centres to be
required prior to lodgement of subdivision. It is therefore recommended that
Part 1 require Detailed Area Plans for the local centres in the LSP 68 area,
prior to lodgement of subdivision.
Mixed Use Areas
The advertised version of LSP 68 included proposed
‘Business’ zones along Toreopango Avenue to the west of Marmion
Avenue; and the District Distributor to the north of Toreopango Avenue. The
WAPC’s modifications required these two ‘Business’ zoned
areas to be replaced with ‘Mixed use’ zones. This is consistent
with the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan which shows these
locations as Mixed Use and would therefore enable consistency with the DSP land
use framework and that an appropriate interface is achieved with the proposed
residential zone to the south of Toreopango Avenue approved as part of the
Capricorn Coastal Village Local Structure Plan. It is recommended that this
modification be accepted.
Conclusion
It is essential that an operational structure plan be put in
place to guide future development in the Yanchep City area, considering the
current and future demand for residential land in the Yanchep area and the need
for employment land to support the significant population growth in the
north-west sub region. Administration recommends that LSP 68 be amended
in line with the WAPC’s schedule of modifications and Administration
Comment and recommendations on those modifications, included in Attachment
4. Once those modifications have been implemented to the
satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability, it is recommended
that LSP 68 be adopted by Council and signed and sealed under Clause 9.6.5 of
DPS 2. Given that LSP 68 has already been advertised and the
modifications are of a minor nature and do not materially affect the endorsed
structure plan, it is considered unnecessary for the Structure Plan to be
readvertised for public comment.
Statutory
Compliance
Part 9 of DPS 2 provides for the assessment and
determination of Structure Plans. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.3 (c) of DPS 2,
if the WAPC requires modification to the Structure Plan, the proponent and/or
Council shall make the modifications required by the WAPC and Council shall
reconsider the Structure Plan under Clause 9.4.
When considering a structure plan under Clause 9.4, pursuant
to this Clause, Council may determine that the Structure Plan is satisfactory
and waive public notification, when it considers that adequate publicity of the
proposal has already been undertaken (recommended in this instance).
Following this, Council must consider the structure plan
under Clause 9.6 and do one or other of the following:
a) refuse
to adopt the Structure Plan; or
b) resolve that the Structure Plan
is satisfactory with or without modifications.
It is recommended that LSP 68 be deemed satisfactory subject
to the WAPC’s modifications being made in accordance with
Administration’s Comments and recommendations, included in Attachment
4.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“3 Economic
3.1 Create
strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands”
Policy
Implications
The Agreement of LSP 68 will provide an operational planning
framework for the assessment of Detailed Area Plans and proposals to subdivide
and develop land in the LSP 68 area.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clauses 9.4.1, 9.6.1(b) and 9.6.3(c) of District Planning Scheme No. 2,
RESOLVES that the Yanchep City Local Structure Plan No. 68 (July 2010), as
submitted by Taylor Burrell Barnett Town Planning and Design on behalf of
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture, is satisfactory subject to the modifications
required by the Western Australian Planning Commission being made, in
accordance with the Administration Comment and recommendations provided in
Attachment 4, to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability;
2. Pursuant
to Clause 9.4.1(a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 WAIVES the requirement for
further public advertising of the Yanchep City Local Structure Plan No.
68; and
3. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the Yanchep City
Local Structure Plan No. 68 document once amended in accordance with
Administration’s comments contained in Attachment 4, AUTHORISES the Mayor
and Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL the duly amended document, and FORWARDS
the Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its
consideration under Clause 9.6.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 to Council Report Finalisation Yanchep
City LSP 68 - Location Plan
|
11/109124
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 to Council Report Finalisation Yanchep
City LSP 68 - Advertised Master Plan
|
11/109126
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 to Council Report Finalisation Yanchep
City LSP 68 - Advertised Part 1 Statutory Section
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 to Council Report
|
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 62
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 63
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 64
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 81
YANCHEP CITY LOCAL
STRUCTURE PLAN No. 68
Schedule of Western
Australia Planning Commission Modifications and Administration Comment
|
No.
|
WAPC Modification
|
Administration Comment
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO’S SCHEDULE OF RECOMMENDED
MODIFICATIONS (9 February 2010)
|
|
|
1
|
The following modifications from the City of
Wanneroo’s Schedule in Attachment 2 [of Council’s resolution of 9
February 2010 (item PS01-02/10)] are to be undertaken: 1.2, 1.3 and 15.3
(with the inclusion of requirement for a Local Structure Plan to be prepared
prior to any subdivision and/or development).
In relation to Parts A-E of Attachment 2, only the
modification required in Part C is to be undertaken.
|
Accepted in part.
Through this
modification the WAPC have removed a number of modifications required by the
Council at its 9 February 2010 meeting, however, the intent of all of these
modifications has been included in later modifications required by the WAPC,
except the Council required modification for:
· A Local
Water Management Strategy (LWMS) to be approved as a condition of the
proposed LSP prior to subdivision or development of land within the proposed
LSP area. This LWMS has now been finalised and it is recommended that the
LWMS be included as an appendix to LSP 68.
· A Karst
Management Plan (only where karst is present) to be provided as condition of
subdivision. It is recommended that this requirement be included in Part 1,
as per the Administration Comment to WAPC Modification 19 below.
· A
minimum density of R60 to apply to the area within 800m of the Yanchep City
Railway Station and any other constructed railway station. This minimum
density requirement is essential for ensuring the provision of appropriate
densities in accordance with the City’s Housing Strategy and as the
WAPC have removed the Council’s generic R60 minimum density requirement
for the 800m Railway Station catchment it is recommended that the minimum
density requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure
Plan be applied instead. This includes a requirement for a minimum average
density of:
o 50
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the Yanchep City Railway
Station and any other constructed railway station;
o 30
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the district activity centre,
which is located to the south of Yanchep Beach Road; and
o 25
dwellings per site hectare along neighbourhood connectors supporting future
public transport routes,
in
accordance with provision 7.6 S1 of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District
Structure Plan.
· A Vegetation
and Fauna Management Strategy (VFMS) to be approved as a condition of the
proposed LSP prior to subdivision or development of land within the proposed
LSP area. This VFMS has now been finalised and it is recommended that the
VFMS be included as an appendix to the LSP 68.
· A
maximum retail net lettable area of 71,800m2 be set for LSP 68.
Subclause 3.13.5 of DPS 2 requires that “(a)ll Centre Zones shall
specify the proposed maximum retail net lettable area (NLA) which
relates to retail floor areas.” In addition, the Yanchep-Two Rocks
Agreed District Structure Plan sets an indicative retail floorspace of 71,800m2
for the Yanchep City Strategic Metropolitan Centre. It is therefore
recommended that a maximum retail net lettable area of 71,800m2 be
included in Part 1 of LSP 68 for the ‘Centre’ zone, in accordance
with the requirements of DPS 2 and consistent with the Yanchep-Two Rocks
Agreed District Structure Plan.
The WAPC have retained
the Council’s required modification 15.3 relating to the intent of the
Special Use Precinct and which makes reference to the set of specific land
use permissibilities included in Part 1 for this area. However, the WAPC have
also required that a further local structure plan be prepared for this
Special Use Precinct prior to any subdivision or development occurring in
this location. As this Special Use Precinct is a significant employment
generating area, it is considered appropriate that a further detailed
structure plan be required over this area prior to subdivision and
development. This will provide a detailed planning framework for this area
that ensures the required level of employment floorspace is delivered in this
location. However, this more detailed structure plan will also detail the
land use permissibilities for this area, and therefore it is recommended that
the reference to the land use permissibilities for the Special Use Precinct
be removed from Part 1 of LSP 68.
|
|
|
PART ONE – STATUTORY SECTION
|
|
|
2.
|
Certification Page is
to be moved to the front of Part 1.
|
Accepted
This modification is editorial and minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
3.
|
Delete the “Table of Contents”
|
Accepted
This modification is editorial and minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
|
1.0 Statutory Planning
|
|
|
4.
|
Delete
provision “1.0 Statutory Planning”
|
Accepted
The intent of provision “1.0 Statutory
Planning” is reinstated by WAPC Modification 5. below. This modification
is considered to be editorial and minor in nature and does not significantly
or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
5.
|
Sections 1.1 – 1.5 are to be replaced with the
standard wording in Attachment 1 [to this Schedule of Modifications].
|
Accepted
This modification is considered editorial and minor in
nature and does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the
structure plan.
|
|
|
2.0 Project Objectives
|
|
|
6.
|
Delete the whole of Section “2.0 Project
Objectives”.
|
Accepted
The objectives included in Section “2.0 Project
Objectives” do not set any specific statutory provisions and it is
therefore considered appropriate for these to be removed from the Part 1
Statutory Section. This modification is considered editorial and minor in
nature and does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the
structure plan. However, it is recommended the Project Objectives contained
within Section 2 be included in the Part 2.
|
|
|
3.0 Operation of Structure Plan
|
|
|
7.
|
Delete Section “3.0 Operation of Structure
Plan”.
|
Accepted
The intent of Section “3.0 Operation of Structure
Plan” is reinstated by WAPC Modification 18 and 19 below. This
modification is considered to be editorial and minor in nature and does not
significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
|
4.0 Structure Plan Map
|
|
|
8.
|
Delete Section “4.0 Structure Plan Map”.
|
Accepted
The intent of Section “4.0 Structure Plan Map”
is reinstated by WAPC Modification 9. below. This modification is considered
to be editorial and minor in nature and does not significantly or materially
alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
|
5.0 Zones and Residential Density Codes
|
|
|
9.
|
Rename Section “5.0 Zones and Residential Density
Codes” with “subdivision” and replace with
the following text:
“The Structure Plan Map (Plan 1) outlines land
use, zones and reserves applicable within the Structure Plan area. The
zones and reserves designated under this Structure Plan apply to the land
within it as if the zones and reserves were incorporated into the
Scheme”.
|
Accepted
The intent of Section “5.0 Zones and Residential
Density Codes” is reinstated by WAPC Modification 9. below. This
modification is considered to be editorial and minor in nature and does not
significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan. The
numbering included in this modification is not final and it is recommended
that it be determined through the modification of the LSP 68 to the
satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
10.
|
Include “Section 6.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant
Buffer” with the following text:
“No subdivision and/or development is permitted
on land located within 350 metres of the Wastewater Treatment Plant, as
depicted on Plan 1, until such time as:
a) the
Wastewater Treatment Plant has been decommissioned; or
b) the
applicant can clearly demonstrate that the odour and/or other impacts
associated with the activity can be ameliorated or do not impact on the land
to the satisfaction of City of Wanneroo and the Water Corporation.”
|
Accepted in part.
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
The numbering included in this modification is not final and it is
recommended that it be determined through the modification of the LSP 68 to
the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
11.
|
Replace Section “5.2 Residential Density” with
the standard wording in Attachment 2 [to this Schedule of
Modifications].
|
Accepted in part
This modification is
considered to be minor in nature and does not significantly or materially
alter the intent of the structure plan except for the removal of Council
requirement for a minimum density of R60 to apply to the area within 800m of
the Yanchep City Railway Station and any other constructed railway station.
This minimum density requirement is essential for ensuring the provision of
appropriate densities in accordance with the City’s Housing Strategy
and as the WAPC have removed the Council’s generic R60 minimum density
requirement for the 800m Railway Station catchment it is recommended that
that the minimum density requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed
District Structure Plan be applied instead. This includes a requirement for a
minimum average density of
· 50
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the Yanchep City Railway
Station and any other constructed railway station;
· 30
dwellings per site hectare within 400 metres of the district activity centre,
which is located to the south of Yanchep Beach Road; and
· 25
dwellings per site hectare along neighbourhood connectors supporting future
public transport routes,
in
accordance with provision 7.6 S1 of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District
Structure Plan.
|
|
12.
|
In Section 5.3:
· Delete reference
to Part Two of the overall Yanchep City Structure Plan…”.
· Replace sections
“a)” and “b)” with “6.3.2”.
· In 5.3.a delete
“In accordance with clause 3.13.3,”; rename the dot points “6.3.1(a)”
and “6.3.1(b)”; in the first dot point replace “the
Agreed Structure Plan Map” with “Plan 1”, replace
“other Agreed Structure Plan Areas outside of the Centre zone”
with “the structure Plan area”, and, in the second dot
point delete “’park and ride’ facilities, commuter parking
areas and”.
|
Accepted
This modification is editorial and minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
The numbering included in this modification is not final and it is
recommended that it be determined through the modification of the LSP 68 to
the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
13.
|
In Section 5.4c delete “Single House” as this
is already identified as a “D” use in the scheme.
|
Accepted
This modification is editorial and minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
14.
|
In Section 5.5 include provisions relating to the need to
prepare Detailed Area Plans prior to any subdivision and/or development
within the zone and that, where relevant the interface between the Business
and Residential zones will need to be appropriately managed through the
DAPs. The DAPs should also ensure that proposed development creates an
appropriate interface with the residential development on the western side of
Marmion Avenue, which is proposed under the Capricorn Coastal Village Local
Structure Plan adoped by the WAPC on 30 November 2010.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
is consistent with the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
15.
|
In Section 5.7 delete the references to the land uses that
are permissible within the zone and replace with Part C of the City’s
Attachment 2.
|
Accepted
See Administration Comment to 1. above.
|
|
16.
|
Inclusion of Section “6.9 Public Open
Space” and the following text:
“The provision of a minimum of 10% public open
space being provided in accordance with the WAPC’s Liveable
Neighbourhoods. Public open space is to be provided generally in
accordance with Plan 1 and Table X, with an
updated public open space schedule to be provided at the time of subdivision
for determination by the WAPC, upon the advice of the City of
Wanneroo”.
Table {INSERT NO. AS APPLICABLE}: Strategic Public Open Space Provision
|
STRATEGIC POS SITE
|
SIZE (HA)
|
|
[INSERT
NAME]
|
[INSERT
AREA]
|
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan. The
numbering included in this modification is not final and it is recommended
that it be determined through the modification of the LSP 68 to the
satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
|
6.0 General Provisions
|
|
|
17.
|
Delete the whole of Section “6.0 General
Provisions”.
|
Accepted
The intent of Section “6.0 General Provisions”
is reinstated by WAPC Modifications 18, 19 and 20. below. This modification
is considered to be editorial and minor in nature and does not significantly
or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
18.
|
Inclusion of Section “6.10 Reports/Strategies/Information
Required Prior to Subdivision” with the following text:
”Prior to the lodgement of subdivisions and/or
development applications the following report/strategies/information are to
be prepared/provided, as application, to the satisfaction of the relevant
authority and provided, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the relevant
authority and provided at the time of subdivision:
a) Noise
Assessment Report for sensitive land use in adjacent to or in the vicinity of
an existing or future major road or rail. (DEC)
b) Vegetation
and Fauna Management Strategy. (City of Wanneroo)
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan. The
numbering included in this modification is not final and it is recommended
that it be determined through the modification of the LSP 68 to the
satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
19.
|
Inclusion of Section “Section 6.11 Conditions of
Subdivision Approval” with the following text:
“At the time of subdivison the City of Wanneroo
may recommend conditions, as applicable, requiring the preparation and/or
implementation of the following strategies:
a) Urban
Water Management Plan (City of Wanneroo/DoW)
b) Geotechnical
Report (City of Wanneroo)
c) Landscaping
Plan (City of Wanneroo)
d) Vegetation
and Fauna Management Plan (City of Wanneroo)
e) Noise
Assessment Report including notifications to be placed ontitle of lots of
sensitive land uses affected by existing or future major road or rail.
(City of Wanneroo)”
|
Accepted in part
This modification is
considered to be editorial and minor in nature and is consistent with the
intent of the structure plan, except for the removal of Council requirement
for a Karst Management Plan (only where karst is present) to be provided as
condition of subdivision. It is recommended that this requirement also be by
including the following text in accordance with Council’s required
modification 15.1:
“f) Karst Management Plan (only where karst is
present) (City of Wanneroo).”
The numbering included in this modification is not final
and it is recommended that it be determined through the modification of the
LSP 68 to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability.
|
|
20.
|
Inclusion of “7.0 Development” and the
inclusion of the folowing text:
“7.1 Detailed Area Plans
As a condition of subdivision, Detailed Area Plans are
to be prepared in accordance with Clause 9.14 of the Scheme for: the Local
Activity Centre; lots within the Mixed Use, Business and Service Industry
Zones; lots within the R10 – R20 density range surrounding the Sun City
Country Club; lots on which sensitive landuses have been identified within
the approved Noise Assessment Report as requiring specific noise amelioration
measures; and development in which interim uses are proposed.”
In addition to the matters identified in Clause 9.14.2
of the Scheme, Detailed Area Plan for lots within the Business zone is to
include, inter alia;
a) Built
form, height and scale;
b) Overshadowing;
c) Interface
with Residential development within the Structure Plan area and on the
western side of Marmion Avenue; and
d) Shared
use of car parking and access arrangements.
7.2 Residential Design Code Variations
Table X sets out variations to the Residential Design
Codes that are deemed to constitue Acceptable Development within the
Structure Plan area and which do not therefore, require neighbour
consultation and planning approval.
Proposed variations to the Residential Design Codes to be
included in this section are to be to the satisfaction of the City of
Wanneroo.
|
Accepted in part.
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan, however,
the City’s Structure Planning Local Planning Policy 4.2 requires Detailed
Area Plans for local centres to be required prior to lodgement of
subdivision. It is recommended that Part 1 require Detailed Area Plans for
local centres prior to lodgement of subdivision.
Variations proposed to be included in Part 1 are included
as Attachment 4 to this Schedule of Modifications. All of the
variations proposed will allow for a superior development outcome, except the
proposed reduction in the open space requirement for R20 lots from a minimum
of 50% of the site, in the current Residential Design Codes, to a minimum of
40% of the site. This would not provide a superior development outcome unless
it is offset by a requirement for a minimum 6m x 4m outdoor living area.
Therefore, Administration supports the proposed variations included in Attachment
4, subject to the variations to the R20 Open Space Requirements allowing
the minimum open space requirement to be reduced to 40% only where a minimum
6m x 4m outdoor living area is provided. It is recommended that these
variations be included in Part 1 of LSP 68.
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
does not significantly or materially alter the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
21.
|
In Section “7.0 Development” a provision
is to be included that states:
“Showroom use, as outlined in the WAPC’s
State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres for Perth and Peel, is not
to exceed 49,000m2 net lettable area (NLA) within the Structure
Plan area. Development of showrooms along regional roads should be in a
manner consistent with SPP 4.2”
|
Accepted.
This provision reiterates the requirements of State
Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres for Perth and Peel and the
maximum net lettable area of 49,000m2 for showroom
floorspace is consistent with the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure
Plan. This modification is considered to be minor in nature and consistent
with the intent of the structure plan as well as Council’s required
modifications to it.
|
|
22.
|
Inclusion of the following clause A:
“The Yanchep Two Rocks District Structure Plan is
subject to monitoring and review by the City of Wanneroo and/or the Western
Australian Planning Commission commencing in 2017. Any amendments to
the Yanchep – Two Rocks District Structure Plan may result in
consequential amendments to the local structure plan and must be consistent
with the District Structure Plan.”
|
Accepted
This provision reiterates the requirements Yanchep-Two
Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan and is considered to be editorial and
minor in nature and does not significantly or materially alter the intent of
the structure plan.
|
|
|
Plan 1 – Structure Plan Map
|
|
|
|
Plan 1 adopted by the City of Wanneroo on 9 February 2010
is to be replaced by the attached Structure Plan Map date stamped 10
May 2011 [Attachment 3 to this Schedule of Modifications], subject to
the following modifications:
|
|
|
23.
|
Inclusion of density ranges of R10 – R20, R20
– R60 and R60 – 100 as shown on the attached plan [Attachment
3 to this Schedule of Modifications].
|
Accepted in Part
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
is consistent with the intent of the structure plan, however, the new R10-R20
area is too extensive. The area to the immediate west and north of the
existing residential development in the “St Andrews Estate” has
not been given an density range.
It is recommended that this R10-R20 area be reduced to
include only the areas where vegetation retention is proposed along the
boundary of the Sun City Country Club, and the remainder of the R10-R20 area
be shown as R20-R60.
It is also recommended that areas area be given a density
range as follows:
· R20-R60 in areas
ajoing the existing residential lots in the “St Andrews Estate”
· R60-R100
elsewhere within 800m of the Yanchep City Railway Station and Yanchep Beach
Road Railway Station.
· R20-R60
elsewhere within the area not area to the immediate west and north of
the existing residential development in the “St Andrews Estate”
that has not been given a density range.
|
|
24.
|
Inclusion of “Civic and Cultural” zones that
correleate with the notations identifying the location of the educational
establishments. Alternatively, Educational Establishments can be
included as a “P” use in the LSP under the
“Residential” zone,
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan. It is recommended
that education establishment be included as a ‘P’ use within the
Residential Zone, but only within the location marked on the Structure Plan
as a High School, Primary School or private ‘kindergarten to year
12’ school. This recognises that the exact location and size of school
sites is subject to detailed design and therefore cannot be specifically
zoned at this stage.
|
|
25.
|
The proposed “Business” zone heading north
along the District Distributor to the north of Toreopango Avenue is to be
replaced with a “Mixed use” zone
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the requirements of
the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan.
|
|
26.
|
The “Business” zone portion along Toreopango
Avenue to the west of Marmion Avenue is recommended to be replaced with a
“Mixed Use” or “Residential” zones. This would
enable consistency with the DSP land use framework and that an appropriate
interface is achieved with the proposed residential zone to the south of
Toreopango Avenue approved as part of the Capricorn Coastal Village Local
Structure Plan as adopted by the WAPC on 30 November 2010.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be minor in nature and
is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the requirements of
the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan.
|
|
27.
|
The proposed substation to be located within the
“Service Industry” zone is to be included.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the
requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan.
|
|
28.
|
Plan 1 is to only show strategic areas of Public Open
Space, such as those identified for retention of vegetation, the 2.5ha
playing field co-located with the northern high school site and the senior
sized oval adjacent to the south eastern primary school which is to
accommodate a Local Community Centre of 5,000m2. These are
to correlate with identified in the Table included in Part 1 where the area
of those sites have been identified.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
29.
|
A Multipurpose Community Centre of 2,500m2 is
to be co-located with the North Eastern Primary School as shown on the
attached plan [Attachment 3 to this Schedule of Modifications].
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be consistent with the
intent of the structure plan and Council’s required modifications to
it.
|
|
30.
|
“Local Distributor” is to be replaced with
“Neighbourhood Connector in accordance with the Liveable Neighbourhood
classifications and the locational criteria’s reference to
Neighbourhood Connectors.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the
requirements of the Liveable Neighbourhoods.
|
|
31.
|
The 24 metre wide easement required for the 132Kv
powerlines located on the western side of the Mitchell Freeway and parallel
to the freeway reserve, is to be included. A notation is also to be
included advising that land uses will be limited to those in accordance with
Western Power’s easement policy.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the
requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan.
|
|
32.
|
A notation being included which states:
“Areas identified as being of National
Environmental Significance under the Environmental Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 may be subject to assessment by the
Federal Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and
Communities, in accordance with this Act. The outcome of any such
assessment may require either a modification to the LSP or minor variations
from the LSP at the subdivision or development stage.”
“The taking of individual Graceful Sun moths, as
a result of the clearing of habitat such as Lomandra Hermaphrodita and
Maritima, requires the permission of the Minister for Environmnet, or their
delegate, pursuant to the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950.”
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the
requirements of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Agreed District Structure Plan.
|
|
PART 2 – EXPLANATORY SECTION
|
|
|
33.
|
Text and wording modifications required in Part 1 are to
be reflected in Part 2, to ensure consistency.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan.
|
|
34.
|
A new Public Open Space schedule is to be included
that:
a) The
deductions identified in the POS schedule is to be modified, with
“Local Activity Centre” being included with “Retail”,
“Above Ground” being included with “Railway Reserve”,
the deletion of “Non Credited Unrestricted Public Open Space”,
and the inclusion of “Drainage Basins (1:1yr Storm
Event)” and “Non Credited Surplus Restricted Public Open
Space”.
b) Unrestricted
POS comprising of “Neighbourhood and Town Parks” and “Town
Squares and Civic Spaces”, the deletion of POS 10 and 12 from the
schedule as these are located within future structure planning areas, and the
inclusion of a 2,500m2 community purpose site.
c) Restricted
POS comprising of “Landform and vegetation Retention” and
“Drainage – Between the 1:5yr and 1:1yr storm
events”. The total amount of Restricted POS is anticipated to
exceed the maximum 2% allowed to be credited as part of the POS contribution,
therefore this is to be included as “Non Credited Surplus Restricted
Public Open Space”.
|
Accepted
This modification is considered to be editorial and minor
in nature and is consistent with the intent of the structure plan and the
requirements of Liveable Neighbourhoods.
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 93
ATTACHMENT 1 TO SCHEDULE OF
MODIFICATIONS 
ATTACHMENT
2 TO SCHEDULE OF MODIFICATIONS 
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 96
ATTACHMENT 3 TO SCHEDULE OF
MODIFICATIONS
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 97
ATTACHMENT 4 TO SCHEDULE OF
MODIFICATIONS
PS06-10/11 Agreement
of Amendment No. 6 to Clarkson District Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 2
File Ref: 3376-06
– 11/108824
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning & Sustainability
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider the modifications required by the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to the draft Amendment No. 6 to Clarkson
District Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 (ASP 2), with a view to determining
a formal Council position on these modifications and the Structure Plan’s
acceptability for agreement.
|
Applicant
|
Greg Rowe and Associates on behalf of AMP Randwick Pty Ltd
|
|
Owner
|
AMP Royal Randwick Pty Ltd and others
|
|
Location
|
All Lots bound by Marmion Avenue to the west; Lower Keys
Drive to the east; Belleville Gardens to the north; and Neerabup Road to the
south, Clarkson
|
|
Site Area
|
Approximately 41 hectares
|
|
MRS Zoning
|
Urban
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
Centre
|
Background
ASP 2 covers approximately 41 hectares of land in and around
the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre. This area comprises the Clarkson Activity
Centre and is bound by Marmion Avenue to the west; Lower Keys Drive to the
east; Belleville Gardens to the north; and Neerabup Road to the south. The ASP
2 area is zoned ‘Urban’ under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS)
and ‘Centre’ in District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). The
location of ASP 2 is illustrated in Attachment 1.
ASP 2 provides for a mixture of commercial, business,
residential and community uses within the Clarkson Activity Centre area. The
Part 1 Statutory Section of the current ASP 2 is included as Attachment 2,
and includes the Structure Plan Map. Currently, there is physical capacity for
the existing Ocean Keys Shopping Centre to expand, however, the current maximum
retail floor space allocated to the centre in ASP 2 limits any further retail
development. On 19 November 2009 Greg Rowe and Associates, on behalf of AMP
Royal Randwick Pty Ltd, lodged a proposed Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 to remove
this limitation.
Amendment No. 6 proposes to delete the maximum retail floor
space of 28,800m2 Nett Lettable Area (NLA) allocated to the centre
in ASP 2, and to permit future retail development to occur in accordance with
the WAPC’s State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres and the
City’s Activity Centres Strategy. The Amendment also proposes to
introduce “Transitional Streets” along Key Largo Drive and
Caribbean Circuit, to provide a transition between Commercial development
fronted by parking areas and the Main Street; and proposes new provisions
relating to a Public Use Reserve.
Amendment No. 6 was advertised for public comment for a
period of 42 days in April and May 2010, with the submission period closing on
18 May 2010. Five submissions were received during the advertising period.
Council considered these submission and Amendment No. 6 at
its 27 July 2010 meeting and resolved that Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 was
satisfactory, subject to modifications, and resolved to refer Amendment No. 6
to the WAPC for approval (PS03-07/10). On 17 August 2010 the City sent
Amendment No. 6, modified in accordance with Council’s resolution, to the
WAPC for approval. A copy of the version of Amendment No. 6 that was
forwarded to the WAPC is included as Attachment 3 and the Part 1
Statutory Section is included as Attachment 4.
In August 2010 the WAPC released the revised State Planning
Policy 4.2 – Activity Centre, which promoted the Clarkson Activity Centre
from a District level centre to a Secondary level centre. Almost 12 months
later, on 19 September 2011, the WAPC wrote to the City informing that it had
resolved to adopt Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2, subject to modifications.
Administration has now consulted with the proponent of Amendment No. 6
regarding these modifications and the proponent accepts all of the
modifications required by the WAPC.
Establishing a formal Council position on the WAPC’s
required modifications will enable finalisation and agreement of LSP 68 and
subsequent determination of a development application to expand the centre in
accordance with that plan.
Detail
Administration considers that all of the WAPC’s
required modifications are of a minor nature and do not materially alter the
intent of the advertised version of Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 or cause
significant detriment to land within or abutting the ASP 2 area. Attachment
5 lists the WAPC’s required modifications, along with
Administration’s comment on each. The WAPC also resolved to replace
the Amendment No. 6 documentation forwarded to the WAPC, included as Attachments
3 and 4, with a revised Part 1 Statutory Section document included
as Attachment 6.
The majority of the WAPC’s modifications relate to
editorial changes that clarify references within the document and the planning
process that will follow on from Amendment No. 6. However, the following
modifications required by the WAPC do affect the proposed statutory provisions
of ASP 2:
· Requirement
for the Retail Sustainability Assessment, undertaken by Pitney Bowes dated
March 2011, and lodged with the WAPC, to be modified to reflect a total retail
floorspace of 44,565m2 in the ASP 2 area;
· Inclusion
of a provision requiring all applications involving major increases in retail
floorspace above 44,565m2 to provide a Retail Sustainability
Assessment prior to being considered; and
· Requirement
for a minimum of ten residential apartments to be constructed prior to any
further development of retail floorspace being permitted in the ASP 2 area.
Comment
Retail Sustainability Assessment and Total Retail
Floorspace of 44,565m2
Through the WAPC’s assessment of Amendment No. 6 a
Retail Sustainability Assessment was undertaken by Pitney Bowes and lodged with
the WAPC. This Assessment, dated March 2011, stated that the retail floorspace
expansion proposed for the Clarkson Activity Centre would bring the total retail
floorspace of the Centre up to 43,183 m2. The Assessment found that,
due to the rapid growth that has been occurring in the North West Sub Region,
the population of the Clarkson Activity Centre’s trade area at 2010,
already more than justifies this increase in retail floorspace.
This does not take into account the significant growth yet
to occur in the Centre’s trade area, in localities such as Tamala Park.
The Assessment modelled that by 2013 the Northern Coastal Corridor would have a
shortfall in retail floorspace of 71,178m2.
Since the City forwarded Amendment No. 6 to the WAPC, the
proponent has conducted more detailed planning and is now proposing a retail
floorspace expansion that would bring the total retail floorspace of the
Clarkson Activity Centre up to 44,565m2. The WAPC’s
modification required that earlier Retail Sustainability Assessment be modified
to reflect a total retail floorspace of 44,565m2. Administration
accepts this modification as significant growth is still to occur in the Clarkson
Activity Centre’s trade area, in localities such as Tamala Park, and the
significant shortfall in retail floorspace modelled in the Retail
Sustainability Assessment at 2013 more than justifies the increase in the
proposed expansion of retail floorspace of 1,382m2. Importantly,
this will not preclude other planned activity centres from also providing this
type of floorspace up to and beyond 2013.
The WAPC also required that a Retail Sustainability
Assessment be prepared prior to any future applications being considered for
increasing retail floorspace above 44,565m2. This modification
reiterates the requirements of State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity
Centres for Perth and Peel and is considered to be minor in nature and
consistent with the intent of the structure plan as well as Council’s
required modifications to it.
Requirement for Ten Residential Apartments in First
Stage of Development
The WAPC’s modification 4 required that a minimum of
ten residential apartments be constructed, or a legal agreement be entered into
to this effect, prior to any further development of retail floorspace being
supported in the ASP 2 area. The applicant accepts this requirement and it is
considered that there is physical capacity for ten residential apartments to be
accommodated within the ASP 2 area and integrated with the re-development of
the Ocean Keys Shopping Centre. This modification is therefore considered to be
acceptable.
Conclusion
It is essential that ASP 2 be amended to allow for
appropriate development to occur within the Clarkson Secondary Centre,
considering the current and future demand for retail floorspace in the Clarkson
area and the need for employment floorspace to support the significant
population growth in the north-west sub region. Administration recommends
that Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 be modified in line with the WAPC’s
schedule of modifications and Administration’s comment and
recommendations on those modifications, included in Attachment 5.
Once those modifications have been implemented to the satisfaction of the
Director Planning and Sustainability, it is recommended that Amendment No. 6 to
ASP 2 be adopted by Council and signed and sealed under Clause 9.6.5 of DPS
2. Given that the amendment has already been advertised and the
modifications are of a minor nature, do not materially alter intent of the
advertised version of Amendment No. 6 or cause significant detriment to land
within or abutting the ASP 2 area, it is considered unnecessary for the
proposal to be readvertised for public comment.
Statutory Compliance
Part 9 of DPS 2 provides for the assessment and
determination of Structure Plan Amendments. Pursuant to subclauses 9.7.1
and 9.6.3 (c) of DPS 2, if the WAPC requires modifications to the Structure
Plan Amendment, the proponent and/or Council shall make the modifications
required by the WAPC and Council shall reconsider the Structure Plan Amendment.
When considering a Structure Plan Amendment, Council may
waive public notification, when it considers that the amendment is of a minor
nature that does not materially alter the intent of the Structure Plan or cause
significant detriment to land within or abutting the Structure Plan area.
Following this, Council must consider the Structure Plan
Amendment under Clause 9.6 and do one or other of the following:
a) refuse
to adopt the Structure Plan Amendment; or
b) resolve that the Structure Plan
Amendment is satisfactory with or without modifications.
It is recommended that Amendment No. 6 to ASP 2 be
deemed satisfactory subject to the WAPC’s modifications being made in
accordance with Administration’s Comments and Recommendations, included
in Attachment 5.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with the
following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“3 Economic
3.1 Create
strategic shifts in job markets to meet future needs and demands”
Policy Implications
The proposal has been assessed and processed under the
provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant
to Clauses 9.6 and 9.7 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, RESOLVES that
Amendment No. 6 to Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 Clarkson District Centre,
included as Attachments 3 and 4, is satisfactory subject to the modifications
required by the Western Australian Planning Commission being made, in
accordance with Administration’s comments and recommendations provided in
Attachment 5, to the satisfaction of the Director Planning and Sustainability;
2. Pursuant
to subclause 9.7.2 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 WAIVES the requirement for
further public advertising of Amendment No. 6 to Agreed Structure Plan No. 2
Clarkson District Centre; and
3. Pursuant
to Clause 9.6.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS Amendment No. 6 to
Agreed Structure Plan No. 2 Clarkson District Centre, included as Attachments 3
and 4, once amended in accordance with Administration’s comments and
recommendations contained in Attachment 5, AUTHORISES the Mayor and Chief
Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL the duly amended document, and FORWARDS the
Structure Plan to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its certification
under Clause 9.6 of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 to Council Report on Amendment 6 to ASP
2 - Location Plan
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2 - Part 1 Statutory Section of the
current ASP 2
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3 - Agreement of Amendment 6 to ASP 2 -
version of Amendment 6 to ASP 2 sent to WAPC
|
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4 - Clarkson Activity Centre ASP (as
amended)
|
|
Minuted
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 5 - Schedule of WAPC's Modifications
and Administration Comment
|
|
Minuted
|
|
6.
|
Attachment 6 to Council Report to Amendment 6 to ASP
2 Part 1 Statutory Section from document approved by WAPC
|
11/110069
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 105
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 106
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 119
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 125
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 140
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 146
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 163
City Businesses
Regulatory Services
CB01-10/11 Application
To Keep More Than Two Dogs
File Ref: 2323V02
– 11/103677
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider five applications for an exemption under section
26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep more than two dogs.
Background
Clause 14 of the City of Wanneroo Animals Local Law 1999
(Amendment 2008 GG 508) stipulates:
“A person shall not keep
or permit to be kept on any premises more than:
a) 2
dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age; or
b) 6
dogs over the age of 3 months and the young of those dogs under that age if the
premises are situated on a lot having an area of 4 hectares or more,
unless the premises are
licensed as an approved kennel establishment or have been granted exemption
pursuant to section 26(3) of the Dog Act and have planning approval under the
town planning scheme.”
Detail
The following applications have been made under the Dog
Act 1976 and are submitted for consideration:
|
Address of
Applicants
|
Description of
Dogs
|
|
1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping
|
1. Male
Sterilised black Poodle
2. Male
Sterilised black Poodle
3. Male
Sterilised tan Chihuahua
|
|
39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara
|
1. Female
Sterilised black & tan Rottweiler
2. Female
Unsterilised black & tan Rottweiler
3. Female
Unsterilised black & tan Rottweiler
|
|
14 Forbes Court, Merriwa
|
1. Female
Sterilised tri-colour Heeler X
2. Male
Sterilised tri-colour Heeler X
3. Female
Unsterilised black Heeler X
|
|
9 Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks
|
1. Female Unsterilised red
Pomeranian
2. Male Sterilised black &
white Dalmatian
3. Male Sterilised sable &
white Collie
|
|
29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler
|
1. Female
Sterilised brindle Boxer
2. Female
Sterilised grey & white Siberian Husky
3. Female
Unsterilised black & tan Rottweiler
|
Rangers have inspected the aforementioned properties to
ensure means exist on the premises at which the dogs will ordinarily be kept
for effectively confining the dogs within the premises.
|
Address of Applicants
|
Property Zonings
|
Size of Properties
|
|
1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping
|
Residential
|
0.0610 hectares
|
|
39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara
|
Special Rural 05
|
1.1088 hectares
|
|
14 Forbes Court, Merriwa
|
Residential
|
0.0826 hectares
|
|
9 Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks
|
Residential
|
0.0500 hectares
|
|
29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler
|
Residential
|
0.0740 hectares
|
Consultation
Where applications have been received by the City to keep
more than two dogs, residents immediately adjoining the applicant’s
property in question are consulted by letter to ascertain if they have any
objections.
The following table outlines the number of objections
received after this consultation:
|
Address of
Applicant
|
Number of
Objection Forms Received
|
|
1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping
|
One objection form
|
|
39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara
|
Nil
|
|
14 Forbes Court, Merriwa
|
One objection form
|
|
9 Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks
|
Two objection forms
|
|
29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler
|
Nil
|
Comment
In considering these applications for exemption, the
following two options are available:
a) Council
may grant an exemption pursuant to Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976
subject to conditions; or
b) Council
may refuse permission to keep more than two dogs.
Application One: 1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep
three dogs at 1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping. The third dog was obtained just
over four years ago due to personal family circumstances. A check of the
City’s records reveals that prior to this application being made, eight
previous complaints have been lodged with Regulatory Services regarding
excessive barking. Only three of the previous complaints were prior to the
application being submitted. Upon attendance at 1 Bonvin Gardens, Tapping by
Rangers, more than two dogs were sighted and an explanation was given by the
applicants that the third dog was only there temporarily and would be returning
to its owner (the applicant’s sister) within a couple of months. The
applicant was advised that if the extra dogs remained that she would have to
apply to Council to keep them at her property, and as such, subsequently lodged
an application. Upon consultation with neighbouring properties one objection
was received regarding the excessive noise made by the dogs on the property.
The applicant addressed the complaint in the right of response saying that she
had contacted her neighbour regarding the noise and stated that she locks the
dog in the laundry to minimise noise pollution.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is
adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs.
The rear fences are 1.8 metres in height and the front gate
is 1.8 metres in height and are as such in compliance with the Dog Act 1976.
The dogs are kept in a medium sized yard and sleep in the house at night.
Given the complaints lodged, it is not recommended that an
exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Two: 39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep
three dogs at 39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara. The applicants would like to
keep three dogs until the elderly dog of 11.5 years passes.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is
adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. All fences are 1.2
metres in height with a gate of 1.2 metres in height in compliance with the
rural requirements of the Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a
large sized yard and sleep in a large kennel at night and no objections were
received during the consultation process.
It is recommended that an exemption under section 26(3) of
the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Three: 14 Forbes Court, Merriwa
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep
three dogs at 14 Forbes Court, Merriwa. The third dog was being kept at
the property occasionally when its owner was working away. The applicant would
like to keep the third dog permanently and the owner is in agreeance. A
check of the City’s records reveals that prior to this application being
made, three previous complaints have been lodged with Regulatory Services
regarding dog wandering and dog attack on a person twice. These complaints were
regarding the two already registered dogs and were dealt with accordingly. A
third dog was not sighted at the premises when Rangers attended the first
complaint.
On the second and third complaints a third dog was sighted
and the applicant explained that it was kept at their premises on an
occasional basis, The applicant was then advised that if the family wished to
keep the dog permanently they would have to apply to Council to keep the dog at
their property. Upon consultation with neighbouring properties one objection
was received regarding the excessive noise made by the dogs on the property.
The applicant addressed the complaint in the right of response saying that
other dogs close to his residence are triggering his dogs to begin barking and
he believes that his dogs barking is within reasonable noise levels.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is
adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. The rear fences
are 1.8 metres in height and the front gate is 1.8 metres in height and are as
such in compliance with the Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a
medium sized yard and sleep in a large shared kennel on the patio at night.
Given the complaints lodged, it is not recommended that an
exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Four: 9 Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep
three dogs at 9 Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks. The third dog came to live with
the applicant because the previous owner (applicants’ mother) is allergic
to its fluffy long hair. A check of the City’s records reveals that
prior to this application being made, no previous complaints have been lodged
with Regulatory Services.
Upon consultation with neighbouring properties two
objections were received regarding excessive barking. The applicant addressed
the complaints in the right of response saying that other barking dogs on
neighbouring properties trigger her dogs to begin barking.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is
adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. The rear fences
are 1.8 metres in height and the front gate is 1.8 metres in height and are as
such in compliance with the Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a
large sized yard and sleep in the house or the kennel at night.
Given the complaints lodged, it is not recommended that an
exemption under section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Application Five: 29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler
The applicant is seeking permission from the City to keep
three dogs at 29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler. The applicant would like to
keep three dogs as they lost their third dog, an elderly Rottweiler, a few
years ago.
A Ranger has inspected the property and confirmed it is
adequate for the confinement and exercise of the dogs. All fences are 1.8
metres in height with a gate of 1.8 metres in height and are as such in
compliance with the Dog Act 1976. The dogs are kept in a large
sized yard and sleep in the house at night and no objections were received
during the consultation process.
It is recommended that an exemption under section 26(3) of
the Dog Act 1976 be granted.
Statutory
Compliance
The exemptions sought to Council’s Animals Local Law
1999 are permissible under Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
2.4.3 Develop
and implement a range of activities that promote community inclusiveness,
safety and well being.”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. GRANTS
an exemption under the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Laws 1999 made under
Section 26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 to keep three dogs at the property at
39 Heritage Terrace, Gnangara; and
29 Bodorgan Avenue, Butler, and ADVISES that the
exemption is subject to the following specified conditions:
a) If
any one of the dogs die or is no longer kept on the property, no replacement is
to be obtained;
b)
Any barking by the subject dogs is to be kept to a minimum; and
c)
This exemption may be varied or revoked if any complaints
are received which are considered reasonable;
2. REFUSES
an exemption to the City of Wanneroo Animal Local Law 1999 made under Section
26(3) of the Dog Act 1976 for the applicants at the properties;
1
Bonvin Gardens, Tapping;
14
Forbes Court, Merriwa; and
9
Howe Elbow, Quinns Rocks
3. ADVISES
the applicants exemptions listed in Recommendation 2 that they may appeal
Council’s decision by writing to the State Administrative Tribunal within
28 days of receiving notice of Council’s decision; and
4. ADVISES
all adjoining neighbours of these decisions in relation to all the properties
listed in the above recommendations.
Attachments: Nil
CB02-10/11 Authorising
Persons to Act Under Division 2 of the Building Act 2011
File Ref: 5642
– 11/103997
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
For Council to authorise the relevant City officers to
perform relevant duties under the Building Act 2011.
Background
The City currently has delegations under the provisions of
the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960. With the full
introduction of the Building Act 2011, these delegations will become
redundant in that the head of power will shift from the Local Government
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960 to the Building Act 2011. This
is applicable to all enforcement duties. This will also impose additional
authorisations for officers to carry out the new relevant provisions under the
new Act.
Detail
Delegations to Positions
New delegations are needed under the Building Act 2011.
Section 127 of the Building Act 2011 enables local governments the
ability to delegate any powers or duties to an employee. Given the relevant
provisions relating to delegations under the Building Act 2011 have not come
into operation, the functions of the new delegations cannot be performed by
officers until such time as the relevant provisions are proclaimed. It is
therefore proposed that officers continue to perform such functions in
accordance with existing delegations with Council adopting the new delegations
to be implemented at such future time as these provisions are proclaimed.
Council is requested to approve the following new
delegations as provided under the following sections of the Building Act:
· s20
– Approve or refuse a Building Permit
· s21
– Approve or refuse a Demolition Permit
· s58
- Issue an Occupancy Permit and a Building Approval Certificate
· s65
- Consider Extending the period of duration of an Occupancy permit or a
Building approval Certificate.
· s110
- Issue Building Orders
· s117
- Revoke Building Orders
Delegations are to be made to officers as set out in Attachment
1.
Authorisations to individual persons
With the introduction of the Building Act 2011,
existing authorisations will not be affected. However additional authorisations
are needed for Officers to carry out the relevant provisions under the Building
Act 2011. Given these relevant provisions have not yet come into operation, the
new authorisations cannot be undertaken by officers until such time as this
occurs.
It is therefore proposed that Council appoint authorised
officers and adopt the new authorisations to be implemented at such future time
as the relevant provisions of the Building Act are proclaimed.
The following new authorisations as per Attachment 2
are therefore proposed under different sections of the Building Act:
· s100 -
Entry Powers
· s101
- Powers after entry for compliance
· s102
- Obtaining information and documents
· s103
- Use of force and assistance
· s106
- Apply for an entry warrant
Implementation date of the Building Act 2011
and the relevant regulations
The implementation date of the Building Act 2011
is likely to be 31 October 2011. Due to the urgent timeline set by the Minister
for the commencement of the Act, the drafting instructions for the regulations
needed to support the proclamation of the Act are being forwarded to
Parliamentary Counsel in three Segments:
- Drafting
Instructions No. 1 which covers Parts 1 (Preliminary), 2 (Building and
Demolition Permits) and 16 (Transitional Provisions) of the Act;
- Drafting
Instructions No. 2 which covers Part 3- 15 of the Act and
- Drafting
Instructions No. 3 which covers fees under the Act.
The Act consists of 16 Parts. So on the
implementation date, all parts of the Act will be activated and the Building
Commission has advised that regulations which are considered essential to
enable the proclamation of the Act will be included. It is planned that other
less urgently needed regulations will be drafted at a later time following
proclamation of the Act.
Consultation
Consultation has occurred with the City Lawyer.
Comment
The Explanatory Memorandum of the Building Bill 2010
states:
“Clause 95 Terms
used: designated permit authority
The “designated permit authority” is the permit
authority that authorises a person to carry out enforcement functions.
The permit authority that issues the building, demolition or occupancy permit
for a building is responsible for enforcement of those permits.
The following extract from the introduction of the
Explanatory Memorandum of the Building Bill 2010 states:
“... local government remains the permit authority
for most buildings under the Bill. However, the State is also made a
permit authority with jurisdiction across Western Australia ...”.
“Clause 96 Authorised
persons
“... 96(3) limits local governments to appointing
employees of the local government to carry out enforcement functions”.
The Building Act provides that :
“96(1) ...
(2) ...
(3) A
local government may, by instrument in writing, designate a person employed by
the local government under the Local Government Act 1995 section 5.36, as an
authorised person for the purposes of this Act in relation to buildings and
incidental structures located, or proposed to be located, in the district of
the local government.
(4) The
regulations may limit to persons belonging to prescribed classes of public
service officers or employees the persons who may be designated as authorised
persons under subsection (1), (2) or (3).
(5) A
person may be designated to be an authorised person for a fixed or indefinite
period.
(6) A
permit authority may, by instrument 96(3) limits local governments to
appointing employees of the local government to carry out enforcement
functions.”
Section 3 of the Building Act defines “authorised
person” as meaning “a person designated under section 96 as an
authorised person.
When read together, the Explanatory Memorandum of the
Building Bill 2010, the introduction of the Explanatory Memorandum of the
Building Bill 2010 and the relevant provisions of the Building Act evidence an
intention by the legislature that the local government appoint individual
employees as authorised persons and not delegate that function to the
CEO. The Council must therefore appoint the “authorised
person” itself.
In order to consider the appropriateness, or otherwise, of
an appointment, Council will be required to take into account the particular individual
employee’s employment history and background. This information is
confidential in nature and therefore will be made available to Councillors
separately.
Statutory
Compliance
This approval will align the City’s obligations and
requirements with Division 2- Authorised Persons of the new Building
Act 2011.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the new authorisations and
appoints the relevant persons as ‘Authorised Officers’ in
accordance with Division 2 of the Building Act 2011 and as set out in
Attachment 1 and 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1- Appointment
|
11/106698
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2- Authorisation
|
11/106766
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 172
Attachment 1-
Appointment
|
APPOINTMENT
BUILDING PERMIT
|
|
Function to be performed:
|
To approve or refuse to approve plans and specifications submitted under
section 20 of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Appointer:
|
Council of the City of
Wanneroo
|
|
Appointee:
|
Coordinator
Building Approvals
Senior Building
Surveyor
Building Surveyor
|
|
Sub-delegation to:
|
N/A
|
|
Legislative Powers:
|
Sections 20, 22
and 96(3) of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Conditions and
Exceptions:
|
In undertaking
the functions of this delegation, Building Surveyors must:
1) be employed
by the City of Wanneroo in accordance with section 5.36 of the Local
Government Act 1995; and
2) be authorised
in writing by the Coordinator Building Approvals prior to exercising the
authority. (Note, this may include other limitations based on the building
surveyor’s experience and demonstrated competencies).
In addition to
the above, for an uncertified application, Building Surveyors must hold the
appropriate qualification as set out under Regulation 6 of the Local
Government (Building Surveyors) Regulations 2008.
|
|
Duration of delegation:
|
Until next annual review
|
|
Origin of Delegation:
|
|
|
Delegation last
reviewed:
|
|
APPOINTMENT
DEMOLITION PERMIT
|
|
Function to be
performed:
|
To approve or refuse to approve plans and specifications submitted under
section 21 of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Delegator:
|
Council of the City of
Wanneroo
|
|
Delegate:
|
Coordinator
Building Approvals
Senior Building
Surveyor
Building
Surveyor
|
|
Sub-delegation to:
|
N/A
|
|
Legislative Powers:
|
Sections 21, 22
and 96(3) of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Conditions and
Exceptions:
|
In undertaking
the functions of this delegation, Building surveyors must:
1) be employed
by the City of Wanneroo in accordance with section 5.36 of the Local
Government Act 1995; and
2) be authorised
in writing by the Coordinator Building Approvals prior to exercising the
authority. (Note, this may include other limitations based on the
officer’s experience and demonstrated competencies).
|
|
Duration of delegation:
|
Until next annual review
|
|
Origin of Delegation:
|
|
|
Delegation last
reviewed:
|
|
|
APPOINTMENT
GRANT OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT, BUILDING APPROVAL
CERTIFICATE
|
|
Function to be performed:
|
To approve, modify or
refuse to approve applications submitted
under section 58 of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Delegator:
|
Council of the City of
Wanneroo
|
|
Delegate:
|
Coordinator
Building Approvals
Senior Building
Surveyor
|
|
Sub-delegation to:
|
N/A
|
|
Legislative Powers:
|
Sections 58 and
96(3) of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Conditions and
Exceptions:
|
In undertaking
the functions of this delegation, Building Surveyors must:
1) be employed
by the City of Wanneroo in accordance with section 5.36 of the Local
Government Act 1995; and
2) be authorised
in writing by the Coordinator Building Approvals prior to exercising the
authority. (Note, this may include other limitations based on the building
surveyor’s experience and demonstrated competencies).
|
|
Duration of delegation:
|
Until next annual review
|
|
Origin of Delegation:
|
|
|
Delegation last reviewed:
|
|
|
APPOINTMENT
EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF DURATION OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT
OR BUILDING APPROVAL CERTIFICATE
|
|
Function to be performed:
|
To approve or refuse to approve applications submitted under section 65 of
the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Delegator:
|
Council of the City of
Wanneroo
|
|
Delegate:
|
Coordinator
Building Approvals
Senior Building
Surveyor
|
|
Sub-delegation to:
|
N/A
|
|
Legislative Powers:
|
Sections 65 of
the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Conditions and
Exceptions:
|
In undertaking
the functions of this delegation, Building Surveyors must:
1) be employed by the City
of Wanneroo in accordance with section 5.36 of the Local Government Act
1995; and
2) be authorised in writing
by the Coordinator Building Approvals prior to exercising the authority.
(Note, this may include other limitations based on the building
surveyor’s experience and demonstrated competencies).
|
|
Duration of delegation:
|
Until next annual review
|
|
Origin of Delegation:
|
|
|
Delegation last reviewed:
|
|
|
APPOINTMENT
BUILDING ORDERS
|
|
Function to be
performed:
|
1) To make building orders
pursuant to section 110 of the Building Act 2011 in relation to: -
· building work
· demolition work
· an existing building or incidental
structure
2) To revoke building orders
pursuant to section 117 of the Building Act 2011
|
|
Delegator:
|
Council of the City of
Wanneroo
|
|
Delegate:
|
Manager of
Regulatory Services; and
Coordinator
Building Approvals
|
|
Sub-delegation to:
|
N/A
|
|
Legislative Powers:
|
Sections 110
and 117of the Building Act 2011.
|
|
Conditions and
Exceptions:
|
1) The Coordinator Building
Approvals may:
· refer Notices to the City Lawyer where
it is considered appropriate.
· determine that an order is to remain in
effect in accordance with section 117 (2) of the Building Act 2011
where it is considered appropriate.
2) In undertaking the
functions of this delegation, Building Surveyors must be employed by the City
of Wanneroo in accordance with section 5.36 of the Local Government Act
1995.
|
|
Duration of delegation:
|
Until next annual review
|
|
Origin of Delegation:
|
|
|
Delegation last
reviewed:
|
|
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 177
CB03-10/11 Application
for a Code Variation for a Single House on Lot 403 (43) Hazel Avenue, Quinns
Rocks
File Ref: 3571
– 11/103725
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider variations to the provisions of the Residential
Design Codes (R-Codes) in respect to the construction of a single house on Lot
403, (43) Hazel Avenue, Quinns Rocks.
|
Applicant
|
Hollywood Builders
|
|
Owner
|
David Xu and Mary Dong
|
|
Location
|
Lot 403, (43) Hazel Avenue, Quinns Rocks
|
|
Site Area
|
911m2
|
|
DPS 2 Zoning
|
R20
|
Background
The subject property is located in the older part of Quinns
Rocks adjacent to the North Western corner of Hazel Avenue and Mary Street and
directly West of Nicholas Avenue approximately 150m from the coast (refer to
location plan Attachment 1). Predominantly single dwellings including
two and three storey homes, loft homes and pole homes have been constructed in
this area. A site plan, floor plans and elevations of the proposal are attached
(refer Attachments 2 – 10).
On July 2011, the City received a “Codes
Variation” application for assessment under the R-Codes for a four level
single house on the subject lot. A preliminary assessment of the application
indicated that the applicant was proposing wall and roof height variations to
the R-Codes in their proposal.
Detail
The existing weather board single storey home is to be
demolished to facilitate the construction of a four storey residence with a
home theatre, gym, games room and store room constructed as an undercroft (Attachment
3). The lot is zoned ‘Residential’ under the District
Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) with a density code of R20. The use class
‘Single House’ is a permitted (P) use in this zone.
The applicant proposes the following variations to the
acceptable development provisions of the Codes Table 3- Maximum building
heights:
1. Wall
height exceeding 6m above natural ground level (seeking 8.6m) as recommended in
the Codes (Council Policy allows a 5% increase in height to 6.30m); and
2. The
roof ridge height exceeding 10m for short ridges (seeking 10.167m) less than 6m
in length.
Consultation
The City sought comments from four adjoining neighbours via
letter on 4 August 2011 and requested comments to be received within 14 days in
accordance with the prescribed time as per the Codes. Two of the neighbours
have not responded, therefore this is deemed that they do not object to the
proposal as allowed by the R-Codes Part 4 Neighbour consultation.
A letter received from the owner of the property 45 Hazel
Avenue, Quinns Rocks provided a statement of no objection on the proviso that
all proposed development in the future within the City of Wanneroo will be
granted approval to construct dwellings at the same roof height as the subject
application.
A letter was received from the owner of 9 Mary Street, a
vacant lot, objecting to the height, bulk, overlooking and impact on ocean
views from 9 Mary Street.
Comment
The reasons for the objection and Administration’s
response is/are detailed below.
Issue – Wall Height and Roof Ridge Height
Exceeding Acceptable Development Standards
The adjoining owner has objected to the wall and roof ridge
height exceeding the acceptable development standards.
Response
Attachments 7 and 8 depict a wall height
constructed on the side elevation facing South with a wall height of 8.60
metres from the natural ground level in lieu of the 6.30 metres, and the roof
ridge height of 10.167 metres in lieu of 9.00 metres above natural ground level
as specified by the acceptable development standards of the R-Codes. Both
objections are deemed invalid when considering the probable future sand pad
level of the objectors’ land where any future dwelling will be located. Attachment
11 depicts the probable sand pad level of 9 Mary Street compared to the
proposed dwelling of 43 Hazel Avenue and this demonstrates that the wall height
will be approximately 2.80 metres above sand pad level and the roof height will
be 7.50 metres above sand pad level. Both are within the parameters of the
Codes.
In accordance with Table 3 of Clause 6.7.1 of the R-Codes
‘Building Height’, variations to these requirements are to meet the
objectives and performance criteria of Clause 6.7 “Building Height’
as detailed below:
“Objective
To ensure the height of
buildings is consistent with the desired scale in a given locality.
Performance criteria:
Building height consistent with
the desired height of buildings in the locality, and to recognise the need to
protect the amenities of adjoining properties, including, where appropriate:
- Adequate
direct sun to buildings and appurtenant open spaces;
- Adequate
daylight to major openings to habitable rooms and;
- Access
to views of significance.”
It is considered that the bulk of the dwelling does not
adversely impact on the amenity of the neighbouring property when considering
the existing dwelling and balcony finished floor levels are similar to the
proposed new dwelling at garage and entry levels. Overlooking is suitably
addressed by screening of balconies to a required height of 1.65 metres above
balcony floors and ocean views will not be reduced as the proposal will be at
single storey level adjacent to the objectors’ lot nor does it overshadow
resulting in any significant loss of natural light. Therefore the proposal
complies with the visual privacy requirements of the R-Codes as the balconies
are setback or screened in accordance with Part 6.3 and Part 6.8 of the
R-Codes.
There are many examples of similar height buildings
constructed or being constructed within the Quinns Rocks area and that this
design is an appropriate and practical proposal on a very steep site.
The proposed dwelling is similar to other dwellings recently
constructed homes in the area.
The R-Codes explanatory guidelines state:
“The Residential Design
Codes have an inherent flexibility because they are based on performance
criteria rather than rigid standards… The performance criteria are
general statements if the means of achieving an objective. They are not meant
to be limiting in nature. Instead, they provide applicants with an opportunity
to develop a variety of design responses to address each residential
issue.”
The applicant has justified the proposed variations,
addressing the performance criterion as required, believing that the proposal
has less impact on adjoining properties.
Recommendation
As there is no significant impact on the adjoining property
and given that there are similar multi storey homes within the vicinity, the
objection is not supported.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Assessed as per the Residential
Design Codes.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the application for the Code
Variation for the variation of wall height and roof ridge height exceeding the Acceptable
Development provisions of the Residential Design Codes of the dwelling proposed
at Lot 403 (43) Hazel Avenue, Quinns Rocks.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 7 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 8 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 9 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Attachment 10 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Attachment 11 to Council Report 11/103725
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 183
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 184
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 185
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 186
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 187
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 188
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 189
Infrastructure
Asset Management
IN01-10/11 Revised
Lake Gnangara Strategic Offset Proposal - Progress Report and Additional
Requirements
File Ref: 3120
– 11/105745
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a revised land management and environmental
offset proposal at Lake Gnangara Reserve, Vintage Park, Tuscan Park and part of
Edgar Griffiths Park for the clearance of native vegetation required for the construction
and realignment of Flynn Drive, Neerabup.
Background
Council considered a report at its meeting on 8 February
2011 (Item IN02-02/11refers) regarding the City’s proposed Offset Banking
Package strategy to address environmental offset conditions linked to clearing
permits required for projects listed in the first five years of the
City’s 10-Year Capital Works Program and resolved, amongst other items,
to:
“ENDORSES the inclusion of Lot 11 (currently
under the ownership and management of the Western Australian Planning
Commission) into the land management and environmental offset proposal at Lake
Gnangara for the clearing of native vegetation associated with road projects,
noting that area will increase from 13.2 hectares to 15.5 hectares”
The City has assembled parcels of land from the Western
Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), to create a larger Lake Gnangara Reserve
and to form part of the environmental offset offered to Department of
Environment and Conservation (DEC) and Department of Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPC) in respect of land
clearing for the road construction programme.
The transfer of the management of this land to the City will
result in land parcels being amalgamated onto one title and allow for the
creation of a Regional Reserve for the site under the Metropolitan Region
Scheme (MRS). The City will then take over the on-going management of the land,
with the land zoned ‘Conservation and Passive Recreation,’ as
outlined in Attachment 1, with the land parcels to be re-vested,
protected and rehabilitated.
The presence of Registered Aboriginal Heritage Sites within
the land however, will delay the proposed rehabilitation and associated works
and the necessary approvals would not be in place before the Flynn Drive road
works are planned to commence. To prevent delays to the project, it is
proposed to amend the environmental offset proposal to exclude rehabilitation
of the registered sites within Lots 1, 11 and 2470.
Under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity
Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the revised draft 2011 guidelines, set
by DSEWPC and released for public comment, to counterbalance the loss of
Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat, an area to the ratio of 6:1 is now
required to offset the clearing of foraging habitat and 10:1 for the clearing
of breeding habitat. The clearing for the construction of Flynn Drive,
totalling 6.7ha is of vegetation considered to be foraging habitat and an
offset at the ratio of 6:1 is required.
This differs from the previously endorsed environmental
offset package which was set at a ratio of 4:1 prior to the issue of the
revised guidelines.
The offset requirement now equates to a total of 40.2ha,
whilst previously it totalled 26.4ha.
Detail
The revised environmental offset package proposal to achieve
the 40.2ha now required is a combination of rehabilitation, land protection and
land transfer from WAPC to City management in four reserves; being Lake
Gnangara Reserve, Vintage Park, Tuscan Park and part of Edgar Griffiths Park.
The land surrounding Edgar Griffiths Park will potentially
be rezoned from rural to residential in the future as part of the East Wanneroo
Structure Plan and the current POS will be required for active sporting
activities. In liaison with the Community Development Directorate, it has been
determined that 9ha out of the total 23.8ha reserve can be reserved for
conservation as it will not be required for sporting facilities.
A total of 25.1ha of off-site rehabilitation and
revegetation will be offered as a direct offset to create habitat for
foraging and potential future breeding for Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo
comprising the following areas:
· 19ha at Lake
Gnangara Reserve, Gnangara
· 1.6ha at Tuscan
Park, Gnangara;
· 1.2ha at Vintage
Park, Gnangara; and
· 3.3ha at Edgar
Griffiths Park, Wanneroo
For location details, refer Attachments 2 and 3.
Landscaping of 4ha within the verges of the Flynn Drive road
reserve with local native species suitable for Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo
foraging will also form part of the environmental offset package.
The remaining 11.1ha requirement will be achieved by the protection
of foraging and potential breeding habitat, through a change in land tenure
from freehold owned by WAPC to Crown Land managed by the City and designated as
‘Conservation and Passive Recreation’ to provide conservation
protection in perpetuity. This will comprise of:
· 5.4ha at Lake
Gnangara, Gnangara and
· 5.7ha at Edgar
Griffiths Park, Wanneroo
The City’s Environmental Offset Works Program in the
10-Year Capital Works Program will need to be updated to reflect the additional
costs associated with the rehabilitation and ongoing management of the
increased land areas. A further report will be presented to Council to
address the changed budget requirements as soon as the works detail and associated
costs of the rehabilitation works have been finalised and agreed with DSEWPC.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The environmental offset promoted at Lake Gnangara has
provided an opportunity to rationalise the land management in the area. As part
of the City’s offset commitment, not only will it be necessary to
conserve and provide tenure for these land parcels by including them into the
Lake Gnangara Conservation Reserve, but also to rehabilitate the bare areas
within the Reserve (total of 19ha).
The change of management order from ‘Parks and
Recreation’ to ‘Conservation and Passive Recreation’ of the
reserves to provide protection of the vegetation, requires the implementation
of the City’s proposed amendment to District Planning Scheme No 2 to
include the category of ‘Conservation and Passive Recreation’ as a
new reserve type under the Scheme. Rehabilitation and maintenance activities
will be required on an ongoing basis within these land parcels.
Statutory
Compliance
Environmental Protection Act
1986
Environmental Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“1 Environment
1.3 Minimise
impact of development on the environment”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
The rehabilitation works required for the Lake Gnangara
Reserve to accommodate the environmental management commitments identified in
the Offset Banking Package are budgeted within the 10-Year Capital Works
Program – Environmental Offset Program, with subsequent on-going
maintenance funded through the City’s future Operations Budgets.
It will be necessary to amend the 10 Year Capital Works
Program and Operations Budgets to reflect the capital costs and on-going costs
associated with the increased environmental offset requirements.
A further report will be presented for consideration Council
in relation to the budget implications arising from the increased environmental
offset requirements.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES
the inclusion of the additional area of 8.9ha at Lake Gnangara, Tuscan Park
(Reserve 41999), Vintage Park (Reserve 42559) and a portion of 9ha at Edgar
Griffiths Park (Reserve 36601) that are currently under the management of the
City into the environmental offset proposal for the construction of Flynn
Drive, inclusive of landscaping of 4ha within the verges of the Flynn Drive
road reserve;
2. NOTES
that upon agreement by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water,
Population and Communities of the offset proposal, a further report will be
presented to Council regarding the budget implications and amendments to the
Environmental Offset Program components of the City’s 10-Year Capital
Works Program and subsequent maintenance impacts on the City’s future
Operations Budgets to reflect the increased costs resulting from the
rehabilitation and ongoing management of the sites specified in Item 1,
specifically:
a. 4ha
of landscaping at Flynn Drive;
b. 11.1ha
for protection of Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo habitat; and
c. 25.1ha of
environmental offset areas requiring restoration.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Conservation and passive Recreation
|
11/96893
|
|
|
2.
|
Off-site rehabilitation at Lake Gnangara, Vintage and
Tuscan Parks
|
11/105845
|
|
|
3.
|
Off-site rehabilitation at Edgar Grifftihs Park
|
11/105840
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 193
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 194
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 195
IN02-10/11 Stormwater
Drainage Asset Management Plan
File Ref: 3977
– 11/107316
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan
(AMP).
Background
The City has made considerable progress with the
implementation of asset management in a structured and integrated manner,
incorporating best practice principles to complement the Strategic Plan and the
Long Term Financial Plan. The City’s Asset Management Policy adopted in
2006 has provided direction and support for Elected Members and staff. The
development of AMPs for infrastructure assets is another key step in the
journey to best practice asset management.
Council has already endorsed the City’s Roads AMP
(Item IN01-09/10 refers), Pathways AMP (Item IN01-11/10 refers) and Buildings
AMP (Item IN01-5/11 refers) at its meetings in 21 September 2010, 16 November
2010 and 3 March 2011 respectively.
Detail
The Stormwater Drainage AMP, like the endorsed Roads,
Pathways and Buildings AMPs, has been prepared utilising IPWEA’s
NAMS.PLUS suite of asset and risk management plan templates and guidelines.
The core headings in the document comprised the following
key components:
· Levels
of Service
· Future
Demand
· Lifecycle
Management Plan
· Financial
Summary
· Asset
Management Practices
· Plan
Improvement and Monitoring
The financial input into the Stormwater Drainage AMP was
based on Moloney’s Asset Management Renewal Demand/Financial Modelling
spreadsheets which was a key component used as part of the Western Australian
Asset Management Improvement (WAAMI) Program.
A copy of the Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan is
available in the Elected Members Reading Room.
Consultation
The Stormwater Drainage AMP was considered at the
Infrastructure Asset Management Steering Committee (IAMSC) and agreed to at its
meetings on 30 June 2011 and 4 August 2011, and subsequently endorsed for
consideration by Council.
Comment
This Stormwater Drainage AMP represents a ‘core’
level plan that will meet minimum organisational requirements for sustainable
service delivery and long term financial planning and reporting in relation to
stormwater drainage assets. Future revisions of this AMP will move the City
towards an ‘advanced’ level plan which will utilise high level risk
management strategies to optimise activities and programs to meet agreed
service levels.
The Stormwater Drainage AMP covers the various components of
the City’s stormwater drainage network, e.g. gully and junction pits,
underground piped system, gross pollutant traps and sump fencing. The
City’s current stormwater drainage network has a current replacement
value of over $180M.
The main focus of this plan is to determine the ongoing
expenditure required to manage the Stormwater Drainage Network to provide
appropriate levels of service for the community. Expenditure has been
determined using all existing information regarding the asset base, its
condition and expected service delivery.
Levels of Service
This section identifies the
current levels of service for stormwater drainage network is generally driven
by the requirements for provision of a safe road network, including Australian
Standards, Regulations, Acts and Council Local Laws that impact the way assets
are managed. These levels of service reflect standards currently in practice in
the public realm which will be used:
· To
inform customers of the level of service they could expect.
· As a
focus for the development of asset management strategies to meet these levels
of service.
· As a
measure of the effectiveness of the City’s Asset Management practices and
the performance of the Stormwater Drainage AMP.
· To
identify the costs and benefits of the services offered.
· To
enable the City and customers to discuss and assess the suitability,
affordability and equality of the existing level of service and to determine
the impact of increasing or decreasing this level in future.
Future Demand
This section analyses the potential factors affecting demand
including population growth, social and technology changes. The impact of these
is examined and demand management strategies recommended as required to modify
demand without compromising customer satisfaction.
Lifecycle Management Plan
This section details how the City plans to manage and
operate stormwater drainage assets at the agreed levels of service while
optimising life cycle costs. It presents asset performance and condition
information and uses asset management principles and decision making to develop
broad strategies and specific work programs to achieve the goals covering the
three key work activities to manage the stormwater drainage network;
· Routine
Maintenance Plan
· Renewal
Plan
· New
/Upgrade Plan
Financial Plan
This section contains the financial requirements resulting
from all the information presented in the previous sections of this asset
management plan. The data presented enables the long term financial plans to be
developed.
Asset Management Practices
This section identifies the strategies, practises and
guidelines supporting asset management practises within the City. These
activities have no direct impact on the condition or performance of the assets
themselves, but provide the tools and functions required to support the
maintenance, renewal and enhancement plans. These functions include:
· System
planning and monitoring
· System
record management
· Asset
management planning and policy
Plan Improvement and Monitoring
This section identifies actions that are required to bridge
the gap between where we are, and where we want to be and outlines the
improvements, monitoring program and setting of performance measures to enhance
future revisions of this plan and associated AMP strategies and financial
projections.
This plan is the first step towards an overall integrated
management program for the City’s stormwater drainage network. It is
anticipated that this document will be live and be updated annually as part of
future the business plan and budget processes. The planned improvements and
actions resulting from this initial Stormwater Drainage AMP include:
· Integrating
this plan with other asset groups to provide an overall integrated renewal
plan.
· Refine,
verify and measure performance against levels of service.
· Engaging
the Community to verify the required levels of service.
· Develop
Preventative Maintenance Programs.
· Improving
the accuracy, quality and speediness of asset data collected and updated into
asset registers.
· Progress
the use of Authority AIM Module to enable asset data to be stored in a
corporate system with the data being easily assessable by City staff.
· Continuing
to refine and improve the Stormwater Drainage AMP.
Statutory
Compliance
The Local Government Act stipulates that in carrying out its
functions, a local government is to use its best endeavours to meet the needs
of current and future generations through an integration of environmental
protection, social advancement and economic prosperity.
As part of the Council’s requirement to comply with
legislation, and to protect its community, it is considered that Council must
establish a clear direction to ensure appropriate asset management practices
are implemented/practiced for its community assets.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.4 Maintain
long-term financial stability”
4.4.1 : Develop,
implement and continuously improve asset management practices and systems to
ensure infrastructure is fit for purpose to provide sustainable and economic
service.
4.4.2 : Develop,
implement and continuously improve the long term financial management plan.
4.4.3 : Broaden
revenue base and other contribution models.
4.4.4 : Develop
and implement initiatives to reduce operating costs.
Policy
Implications
The Stormwater Drainage AMP outlines the City’s
current position in relation to the management of its stormwater drainage
assets and identifies target areas for improvement. This document will also
facilitate good asset management practises and supports the principles outlined
in the City’s Asset Management Policy.
Financial
Implications
The Stormwater Drainage AMP will be used as a basis for
preparing long term stormwater drainage asset renewal and maintenance plans for
incorporation in the 10-Year Strategic Financial Plan and the 10-Year Capital
Works Program – Stormwater Drainage.
An outcome of the asset management process will be improved
financial decision making, with efficiencies generated by:
· Improved
decision making based on costs and benefits of alternatives;
· Prioritisation
of investments, interventions and infrastructure asset core activities;
· Justification
for forward works programs and funding requirements; and
· Recognition
of all costs of owning/operating infrastructure assets over the lifecycle of
the assets.
The Stormwater Drainage AMP has
indicated that there is an ongoing requirement to replace sump fencing. This is
not currently listed in the 10-Year Capital Works Program – Stormwater
Drainage and it is proposed that an amount of $45,000 be listed in the Program
commencing 2012/2013 subject to a condition audit of the City’s network
of sump fencing in 2011/2012.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES
the Stormwater Drainage Asset Management Plan as tabled in the Elected Members
Reading Room; and
2. LISTS
for consideration in the 10-Year Capital Works Program - Stormwater Drainage an
annual amount of $45,000 for sump fencing renewal starting in 2012/2013 subject
to a condition audit of the City’s network of sump fencing in 2011/2012.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 200
Tenders
IN03-10/11 Tender
No 01131 - Provision of Seed Collection and Plant Propagation Services from
Reserves within the City of Wanneroo
File Ref: 6481
– 11/105331
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No
011031 for the Provision of Seed Collection and Plant Propagation Services for
Reserves Within the City of Wanneroo.
Background
The 2011/2012 Capital Works Program has identified projects
involving the maintenance and rehabilitation of natural areas, as well as
landscaping requirements for major road projects for the extensions of Ocean
Reef Road, the realignment and upgrade of Pinjar Road and the realignment of
Flynn Drive. The works arising will fulfil clearing offset requirements from
the Department of Environment and Conservation (State) and the Department of
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and the Communities (Federal)
through extensive rehabilitation and management of existing reserves over
several years.
Tender 01131 combines the requirements for seed collection
and plant propagation services across the City for 2011/2012 and 2012/2013, and
allows for the planning and preparation of seed and plant stock ready for
planting of indigenous species at the appropriate time.
It is noted that the Schedule of Items included in the
tender document for pricing was considered too extensive to be incorporated
into an attachment to this report, with a copy of the Tender Specification
incorporating the Price Schedules made available in the Elected Members’
Reading Room for perusal.
Detail
Tender No. 01131 was advertised
on 27 August 2011 and closed on 13 September 2011.
The Contract, subject to
Council’s consideration of Tender Award, is scheduled to commence in
November 2011 to coincide with the seed collection season and plant propagation
for the successive winter planting period that will commence the following
financial year (2012/2013).
Essential details of the
contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type
|
Schedule
of Rates
|
|
Contract Duration
|
2
years
|
|
Commencement Date
|
1
November 2011
|
|
Expiry Date
|
1
August 2013
|
|
Extension Permitted
|
1
x 12 month extension available for both Seed Collection and Plant Propagation
Services and CPI for Perth applies
|
|
Rise And Fall Included
|
No
|
Three tender submissions were
received as follows:
– DP Family
Trust trading as Plantrite (Plantrite)
– GHEMS
Holdings Pty Ltd trading as GHEMS Revegetation Environmental (GHEMS)
– Natural Area
Holdings Pty Ltd trading as Natural Area Management and Services (NAMS)
The tender allowed for partial
submissions to be made so long as a completed table was received. Two tenderers
amalgamated their resources and provided a fully complete joint submission,
these being GHEMS and Plantrite. NAMS’ submission included selectively
completed Price Schedules.
The Tender Evaluation Team,
consisting of the Project Officer Environment, Project Manager Civil Contracts
and the Contracts Officer, have evaluated the tender submissions in accordance
with the following process and selection criteria:
|
STEP
1
|
1
|
Demonstrated experience in similar projects
|
Based on previous completed projects of a similar
nature and track record
|
|
2
|
Availability of resources, methodology and capacity
|
Based on tenderer’s resources, methodology and
capacity to perform the works
|
|
3
|
Safety Management
|
Based on tenderer’s safety record and safety
management plan.
|
|
STEP
2
|
1
|
Price of Works
|
Assessment of Tenderer’s price and
clarifications
|
|
2
|
Risk Assessment
|
Risk assessment based on ranking of Step 1 process and
price of works
|
The weightings applied to Step 1 of the criteria was as
follows:
|
Item No
|
Description
|
Score
|
|
1
|
Demonstrated Experience
|
20%
|
|
2
|
Resources, Methodology and Capacity
|
50%
|
|
3
|
Safety Management
|
10%
|
For Step 1 of the evaluation process, the Tender Evaluation
Panel undertook a detailed technical assessment of the submissions to arrive at
a consensus evaluation on the tenders received.
The Tender Evaluation Panel
assessed GHEMS and Plantrite separately regarding the Step 1 assessment.
However, as they submitted a joint tender submission, the weighted scores from
each assessment were combined to achieve the overall ranking for each of the
selection criteria in order to link into the Step 2 assessment results.
Demonstrated
experience in similar projects (20%)
All tenderers have sufficient experience in carrying out the
required work, and outlined in varying degrees of detail, similar work with
other agencies. All companies are considered to have similar demonstrated
experience relevant to the services required for the tender. In addition, all
three companies have previously provided a high standard of goods and services
to the City and as a consequence, were ranked equally.
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and
Plantrite
|
1
|
|
Natural Area Management &
Services
|
1
|
Resources,
Methodology and Capacity (50%)
The tenderers all demonstrated in varying degrees, the
resources and capacity to service this project. The tenderer’s resources
contained in the tender documentation were examined in order to evaluate their
ability to meet the requirements of the Contract. Assessment of this
criterion considered the tenderer’s staff resources, vehicles,
plant/equipment and workshop support to manage the contract. The
tenderer’s methodology covered seed collection and propagation
timeframes, techniques and hygiene processes used in both seed collection and
propagation and general work methods. The substance and quality of the
submissions were assessed as below:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Natural Area Management &
Services
|
1
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and
Plantrite
|
2
|
Safety
Management (10%)
Evidence of safety management
policies and practices was assessed from the tender documents. The assessment
for safety management was based on the tenderers’ responses to an
Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire and any attached
safety plans, polices and procedures included within the tender documentation.
All the tenderers provided details of
their safety management systems with the following ranking:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Natural Area Management &
Services
|
1
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and
Plantrite
|
2
|
Overall Ranking Assessment following Step 1 Process:
On the basis of the overall scoring on the tender criteria
for Step 1, the ranking is shown below:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services
|
1
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and Plantrite
|
2
|
For Step 2, the Tender Evaluation
Panel undertook a detailed cost assessment of all tender submissions received.
Price
for the services offered (20%)
The Price Schedule required rates to provide local
provenance from nominated reserves within the City’s jurisdiction.
A species list was provided for each reserve with a nominated number of plants
to be propagated from seed collected. The Price Schedules enabled seed
collection and plant propagation works respectively to be apportioned and if
necessary, separately awarded for a specific reserve and financial year. This
combined the requirements of landscape, offset and conservation works.
The weighting applied to Step 2 of the criteria was as
follows:
|
Item No
|
Description
|
Score
|
|
1
|
Price of Works
|
20%
|
The tenders were assessed in two parts for price as follows:
· Part
1 All Schedule 1B Tables (excludes Schedule 1C)
· Part
2 All Schedule 1C Tables (excludes Schedule 1B)
In consideration of Part 1 (Seed Collection for 2011/2012
and Plant Propagation 2012/2013 – Schedule 1B), the tenderers were not
ranked given one tenderer only submitted prices for scheduled items in part.
Tender prices received are tabled as follows:
|
Tenderer
|
Overall Tender
Price for Schedule 1B
|
Ranking
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and Plantrite
|
$254,930.40
|
N/A
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services
|
$85,225.80*
|
N/A
|
*Note:
Not all schedule items priced
GHEMS and Plantrite have a lower tender price for all
components of Schedule 1B when compared with those that NAMS priced.
The GHEMS and Plantrite joint tender submission was
conditional on the basis that if a tender in part is awarded then the value
must reflect a minimum of 70% of the overall tender value.
In consideration of Part 2 (Seed Collection for 2011/2012
and Plant Propagation 2012/2013 – Schedule 1C), the tenderers were ranked
as follows:
|
Tenderer
|
Overall Tender
Price for Schedule 1C
|
Ranking
|
|
Natural Area Management & Services
|
$25,370.00
|
1
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and Plantrite
|
$27,898.00
|
2
|
Overall Ranking Assessment
following the Step 2 Process
The overall ranking of the tenderers in relation to Schedule
1B is tabled below:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd
and Plantrite
|
1
|
|
Natural Area Management
& Services
|
2
|
Albeit NAMS only priced some of the scheduled items, GHEMS
and Plantrite were ranked higher given prices submitted for their corresponding
items were all slightly lower in price.
The overall ranking of the tenderers in relation to Schedule
1C is tabled below:
|
Tenderer
|
Ranking
|
|
Natural Area Management
& Services
|
1
|
|
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd
and Plantrite
|
2
|
Consultation
Consultation has occurred with the City’s Natural
Assets Officer in relation to the negotiation of environmental offset packages
for the City.
Preparation of the tender documentation, inclusive of the
species list, was coordinated with the City’s Conservation Maintenance
and Infrastructure Projects officers.
Comment
GHEMS and Plantrite are recommended by the Tender Evaluation
Panel as the preferred joint tenderer for Schedule 1B Table Numbers 1 to 9, 11,
12, 14 to 17, 19 and 21. This allocation of Schedule 1B works to GHEMS and
Plantrite satisfies the tender submission condition that if awarded the tender
in part that the value must reflect a minimum of 70% of the overall tender
value.
NAMS are recommended by the Tender Evaluation Panel as the
preferred tenderer for Schedule 1B Table Numbers 10, 13, 18 and 20 and although
these scheduled items were higher in price as compared to the GHEMS and
Plantrite tender submission, they were recommended by the Tender Evaluation
Panel for these works as they are also recommended to undertake all the coastal
works contained within Schedule 1C. The Tender Evaluation Panel agreed that
from a project management point of view all coastal plants provided for the
City’s coastal projects should be provided by the same Contractor to
ensure quality control of stock and uniformity of growth heights in propagated
material. It is noted that the cost difference in awarding the four Schedule 1B
table items to NAMS instead of the joint submission by GHEMS and Plantrite
equates to an additional amount of $1,048.71.
The tenderers have been evaluated as per the evaluation
criteria, with the Tender Evaluation Panel recommending that the tender be
awarded in part to GHEMS and Plantrite as “Joint Tenderers,” and NAMS
as summarised below:
GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and
Plantrite:
Seed Collection Program
(2011/2012)
$51,637.20
Plant Propagation Program
(2012/2013) $182,773.69
TOTAL $234,410.89
Natural Area Management and
Services:
Seed Collection Program
(2011/2012)
$8,054.93
Plant Propagation Program
(2012/2013)
$38,883.28
TOTAL
$46,938.21
The overall value of the works for which tender award is
being considered amounts to $281,349.10.
The tenderers are considered to be competent in the field of
seed collection and plant propagation services and have carried out similar
works previously for the City.
Statutory
Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of
Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and
evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“1 Environment
1.1 Improve
conservation of local biodiversity in designated areas”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Tender No 01131 combines and
apportions the requirements for the following projects from the 2011/2012
Capital Works Program as follows:
|
PROJECT
|
ESTIMATED COST
|
|
PR-2088 Lake Badgerup
|
$16,926.60
|
|
PR-2090 Lake Gnangara
|
$13,181.80
|
|
PR-2091 Caporn, San
Teodoro, Spring & Alvarez Parks
|
$7,022.60
|
|
PR-2092 Appleby Park
|
$2,155.40
|
|
PR-2093 Landscaping of
Pinjar Road Stage 2
|
$5,883.30
|
|
PR- 2016 various Dune
Restoration Projects
|
$8,054.93
|
|
Conservation
Maintenance Projects
|
$6,467.50
|
|
TOTAL
|
$59,692.13
|
Sufficient funds are available from the allocated project
budgets in the City’s 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget to undertake the
seed collection and seed storage works.
The balance of the tendered works totalling $221,656.97
relates to projects to be funded as part of the 2012/2013 Capital Works
Program. As a consequence, a commitment in funds by Council beyond that
currently approved is noted.
Furthermore, tendered quantities are estimates only and that
this tender allows for payment of actual quantities at the tendered rates
applicable, so actual cost may differ as a consequence of final measures.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. NOTES that
Tender No 01131 for the Provision of Seed Collection and Plant Propagation
Services from Reserves within the City of Wanneroo covers seed collection and
plant propagation services over two financial years; 2011/2012 for which budget
has been approved with proposed expenditure estimated at $59,692.13, and
2012/2013 for which budget has not yet been approved with proposed expenditure
estimated at $221,656.97;
2. ACCEPTS Tender
No 01131 for the Provision of Seed Collection and Plant Propagation Services
from Reserves within the City of Wanneroo as per the submitted Tender Schedules
in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Tender
documentation, with an option to extend for a further 12 months, or part
thereof and subject to CPI, in part as follows:
a) Joint tender
submitted by “GHEMS Holdings Pty Ltd and Plantrite”
for Schedule 1B, Tables 1, to 9, 11, 12, 14, to 17, 19 and 21 for its
tendered price of $234,410.89; and,
b) The tender submitted by
“Natural Area Management and Services” for Schedule
1B, Tables 10, 13, 18 and 20 and all Tables within Schedule 1C for its
tendered price of $46,938.21.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 207
Traffic
Management
IN04-10/11 Regents
Estates - Backshall Place Trial Road Closure - Community Consultation Results
File Ref: 3120
– 11/107475
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the results of the community consultation
regarding the 15-month partial road closure at the intersection of Backshall
Place and Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo.
Background
At the meeting held on 1 June 2010, Council resolved (IN07-06/10
refers):
“1. RECEIVES
the Regent Estates Precinct Traffic Management Review Report 2010 prepared by
Shawmac Pty Ltd;
2. APPROVES
the proposed turning restrictions at the junction of Backshall Place and Ocean
Reef Road to prevent access into Backshall Place from Ocean Reef Road, as shown
in Attachment 4, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 Section 3.50
as amended. The proposed restriction to extend for 15 months from August
2010 until October 2011;
3. NOTES
that Administration will develop Traffic Management schemes in St Fillans Bend
and Backshall Place to reduce traffic speeds and consult with the affected
property owners/occupiers; and
4. ADVISES
the owners/occupiers of all properties in the area bounded by Wanneroo Road,
San Rosa Road, Yellagonga Regional Park and Ocean Reef Road of Council’s
decision.”
This consideration by Council followed three trial road
closures, community consultation following the trial closures and a community
meeting held on 28 April 2010.
After advertising the proposed road closure and considering
the submissions received, Council considered a further report at its meeting on
27 July 2010 (IN07-07/10 refers) and resolved:
“1. RECEIVES
the public submissions concerning the proposed turning restrictions at the
junction of Backshall Place and Ocean Reef Road to prevent access into
Backshall Place from Ocean Reef Road;
2. REAFFIRMS its decision to support the
proposed turning restrictions at the
junction
of Backshall Place and Ocean Reef Road to prevent access into
Backshall
Place from Ocean Reef Road, as shown in Attachment 1, in
accordance with
the Local Government Act 1995 Section 3.50 as amended. The proposed restriction
to extend for 15 months from August 2010 until October 2011;
3. NOTES that Administration will continue to
discuss access options with Main Roads WA for Wanneroo Road between the
Wanneroo Townsite and Ocean Reef Road; and
4. ADVISES the owners/occupiers of all properties in the
area bounded by Wanneroo Road, San Rosa Road, Yellagonga Regional Park and
Ocean Reef Road of Council’s decision.”
The Backshall Place/Ocean Reef
Road partial closure layout referred above as Attachment 1 was modified and
revised accordingly, refer Attachment 1 for the revised version.
Detail
The trial treatment was installed in August 2010 with the
closure approval through to October 2011.
The City has completed traffic
counts throughout the Regents Estates area to monitor the traffic patterns and
behaviour.
The following abbreviations relate
to the data presented:
AWT – Average Weekday Traffic
(vehicles per day)
85%ile – The speed at or below
which 85% of vehicles are travelling (km/h)
Max – Maximum speed recorded
during study (km/h)
Pace – The 20km/h speed range
containing the largest number of vehicles
Pace% - The percentage of vehicles
contained in the 20km pace range.
Traffic data is tabled as follows:
James Spiers Drive - South of Scenic Drive
|
Year
|
AWT
|
Predicted
|
85%ile
|
Max
|
Pace
|
Pace%
|
Comment
|
|
Aug-11
|
1559
|
1500
|
35
|
54
|
|
|
14 months of Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road Trial
Closure
|
|
Mar-11
|
1667
|
|
35
|
58
|
21 - 41
|
98
|
Current Trial
|
|
Sep-09
|
1532
|
|
39
|
64
|
24 - 44
|
96
|
4 week Trial
|
|
Aug-09
|
2353
|
|
39
|
62
|
22 - 42
|
96
|
|
|
Sep-07
|
2363
|
|
34
|
51
|
20 - 40
|
97
|
|
|
Dec-06
|
2177
|
|
33
|
52
|
19 - 39
|
98
|
|
|
Apr-05
|
1428
|
|
37
|
60
|
22 - 42
|
97
|
|
Villanova Street - East of
Calabrese Avenue
|
Year
|
AWT
|
Predicted
|
85%ile
|
Max
|
Pace
|
Pace%
|
Comment
|
|
Aug-11
|
2979
|
3400
|
46
|
73.5
|
|
|
14 months of Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road Trial
Closure
|
|
Mar-11
|
3159
|
|
46
|
90
|
30 - 50
|
88
|
Current Trial
|
|
Sep-09
|
2871
|
|
48
|
75
|
31 - 51
|
88
|
4 week Trial
|
|
Aug-09
|
2408
|
|
48
|
76
|
32 - 52
|
86
|
|
|
Sep-07
|
2508
|
|
48
|
97
|
31 - 51
|
82
|
|
|
Dec-06
|
2565
|
|
48
|
78
|
31 - 51
|
85
|
|
|
Apr-05
|
3212
|
|
48
|
79
|
32 - 52
|
86
|
|
Tyne Crescent - North of
Backshall Place
|
Year
|
AWT
|
Predicted
|
85%ile
|
Max
|
Pace
|
Pace%
|
Comment
|
|
Aug-11
|
1327
|
1800
|
61
|
107
|
|
|
14 months of Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road Trial
Closure
|
|
Mar-11
|
1340
|
|
51
|
80
|
36 - 56
|
83
|
Current Trial
|
|
Sep-09
|
1302
|
|
50
|
73
|
35 - 55
|
84
|
4 week Trial
|
|
Aug-09
|
3009
|
|
50
|
104
|
34 - 54
|
86
|
|
|
Feb-09
|
3178
|
|
50
|
104
|
34 - 54
|
86
|
|
|
May-08
|
3250
|
|
48
|
91
|
32 - 52
|
88
|
|
|
Sep-07
|
2851
|
|
49
|
117
|
32 - 52
|
88
|
|
|
Dec-06
|
2796
|
|
51
|
82
|
34 - 54
|
84
|
|
|
Apr-05
|
1425
|
|
48
|
69
|
31 - 51
|
87
|
|
Backshall Place - East of
Tyne Crescent
|
Year
|
AWT
|
Predicted
|
85%ile
|
Max
|
Pace
|
Pace%
|
Comment
|
|
Aug-11
|
768
|
900
|
61
|
107
|
|
|
14 months of Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road Trial
Closure
|
|
Mar-11
|
849
|
|
61
|
111
|
43 - 63
|
79
|
Current Trial
|
|
Sep-09
|
778
|
|
61
|
110
|
42 - 62
|
76
|
4 week Trial
|
|
Aug-09
|
1787
|
|
42
|
89
|
27 - 47
|
92
|
|
|
Feb-09
|
1781
|
|
42
|
89
|
27 - 47
|
92
|
|
|
Sep-07
|
1840
|
|
53
|
87
|
36 - 56
|
85
|
|
|
Dec-06
|
1549
|
|
48
|
85
|
31 - 51
|
85
|
|
|
Apr-05
|
1791
|
|
67
|
127
|
47 - 67
|
70
|
|
The traffic counts show that the
volumes of traffic using the roads within Regent Estates have been reduced in
Backshall Place, Tyne Crescent and James Spiers Drive, with the traffic
increasing in Villanova Street as forecast by the modelling carried out before
the closure.
A consequence of the reduced
traffic volumes however, has been that traffic speeds have increased in
Backshall Place, Tyne Crescent and James Spiers Drive, due to the unrestricted
traffic flow that now occurs in these roads.
Whilst the accident figures are not
yet available for the 12 months that the movement restriction has been in
place, accident data is available for the 5 years to 31 December 2010. In
this period, the accident statistics for the three major intersections that
link to the Regent Estates road network are as follows:
Ocean
Reef/Backshall Place 19
Accidents
Wanneroo
Road/Villanova Street 21
Accidents
Wanneroo
Road/Scenic Drive
8 Accidents
In the three month period from when the partial closure at
Backshall Place was installed until 31 December 2010 (ie: the end of the period
for which accident data is available) the following reported accidents are
noted:
|
Junction
|
Accident Type
|
Colliding
Vehicle Direction
|
Hit Vehicle
Direction
|
|
Ocean Reef Road
|
Backshall Place
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Road
|
Villanova Street
|
PDO Major Right Turn
Through
|
From Villanova south
into Wanneroo Road
|
Travelling south on
Wanneroo Road
|
|
PDO Major Rear End
|
Villanova Street east
bound
|
Villanova Street east
bound
|
|
PDO Major Right Turn
|
Travelling North on
Wanneroo Road
|
From Villanova south
into Wanneroo Road
|
|
Wanneroo Road
|
Scenic Drive
|
PDO Major Right Turn
|
Travelling North on
Wanneroo Road
|
From Wanneroo Road
southbound into Scenic Drive
|
NOTE: PDO Major is an accident that damages the vehicle
only, to an estimated value < $1,000.
To further improve road safety in
the area, it is suggested that Main Roads WA be approached to investigate the
traffic movements at the junction of Wanneroo Road and Villanova Street to
determine whether the right turn manoeuvre should be restricted, as this
manoeuvre represents the highest number of accidents at the junction.
Consultation
A community consultation survey was
sent to residents of Regents Estates bounded by Ocean Reef Road, Scenic Drive
and Wanneroo Road on 10 August 2011, requesting a response by Friday 26 August
2011, to determine whether the partial road closure at the intersection should
be made permanent or not, refer Attachment 2. A further letter, dated
30 August 2011, with the same details as per the 10 August letter, was also
sent to residents in the area north of Regents Estates, bounded by Wanneroo
Road, San Rosa Road and Scenic Drive, who had previously been consulted to
ensure full coverage.
The community consultation survey was sent to a total of 763
properties asking residents to respond as to whether the Backshall Place/Ocean
Reef Road intersection treatment should become permanent by answering
‘YES’ or ‘NO’.
In addition, a petition (Petition PT02-09/11) containing 175
signatures was received at the Council Meeting held on 20 September 2011 from
residents of City of Wanneroo requesting Council:
“To remove the temporary
road closure at Backshall Place and Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo which restricts
traffic from entering the Regents Waters Estate via Backshall Place at the
intersection of Ocean Reef Road, Wanneroo. We request the City cease the
long term trial scheduled to end in October 2011, effective immediately, and
desist from erecting any permanent road closure at this intersection. The
road closure is causing unnecessary inconvenience for all residents of the
Regents Water Estate, requiring them to detour to Wanneroo Road and Ocean Reef
Road intersection and enter the estate via Villanova Street, and causing
greater waits and more hazardous driving conditions at the intersection of
Ocean Reef Road and Backshall Place when attempting to turn right onto Ocean Reef
Road heading in a westerly direction. We are also concerned our property
values could be affected due to the restriction in access to and from the
Mitchell Freeway.”
The results of the survey and details of the petition are
summarised as follows;
|
Road Name
|
No. of Residences
|
Response %
|
Support the Partial Road Closure at
Backshall Place
|
Response %
|
No of Residences Signed Petition
|
|
Total
|
Replied
|
Yes
|
No
|
In favour
|
|
Andrews Turn
|
40
|
22
|
55%
|
6
|
18
|
27%
|
9
|
|
Appin Way
|
4
|
2
|
50%
|
0
|
2
|
0%
|
1
|
|
Backshall Place
|
28
|
18
|
64%
|
11
|
7
|
61%
|
4
|
|
Bothwell Way
|
18
|
9
|
50%
|
3
|
6
|
33%
|
2
|
|
Bowmore Drive
|
20
|
7
|
35%
|
3
|
4
|
42%
|
3
|
|
Calabrese Avenue
|
60
|
32
|
52%
|
12
|
20
|
37%
|
5
|
|
Calophylla Court
|
8
|
2
|
25%
|
1
|
1
|
50%
|
0
|
|
Clyde Court
|
11
|
7
|
64%
|
1
|
6
|
14%
|
1
|
|
Crieff Gardens
|
5
|
4
|
80%
|
0
|
4
|
0%
|
4
|
|
Cyclamon Court
|
6
|
3
|
50%
|
2
|
1
|
66%
|
0
|
|
Decora Court
|
10
|
3
|
30%
|
2
|
1
|
66%
|
0
|
|
Fordoun Way
|
9
|
4
|
44%
|
0
|
4
|
0%
|
2
|
|
Jacaranda Drive
|
17
|
4
|
24%
|
2
|
2
|
50%
|
0
|
|
James Spiers Drive
|
86
|
49
|
57%
|
30
|
19
|
61%
|
7
|
|
Kelty Road
|
9
|
7
|
78%
|
2
|
5
|
29%
|
2
|
|
Kentia Loop
|
28
|
6
|
21%
|
3
|
3
|
50%
|
1
|
|
Loyal Terrace
|
12
|
4
|
33%
|
1
|
3
|
25%
|
5
|
|
Mangano Place
|
97
|
21
|
22%
|
14
|
7
|
66%
|
2
|
|
Marginata Place
|
11
|
6
|
55%
|
1
|
5
|
17%
|
0
|
|
Nevis Place
|
4
|
4
|
100%
|
2
|
2
|
50%
|
1
|
|
Ocean Reef Caravan Village
|
1
|
1
|
100%
|
0
|
1
|
0%
|
0
|
|
Poinciana Place
|
9
|
3
|
33%
|
3
|
0
|
100%
|
1
|
|
Rosewell Green
|
25
|
14
|
56%
|
3
|
11
|
21%
|
4
|
|
Roslin Road
|
18
|
8
|
44%
|
1
|
7
|
13%
|
1
|
|
San Rosa Road
|
11
|
9
|
82%
|
4
|
5
|
44%
|
0
|
|
Saint Fillans Bend
|
53
|
30
|
57%
|
9
|
20
|
31%
|
9
|
|
Scenic Drive
|
14
|
11
|
79%
|
9
|
2
|
82%
|
2
|
|
Torridon Loop
|
75
|
35
|
47%
|
20
|
14
|
59%
|
5
|
|
Tweed Road
|
6
|
2
|
33%
|
2
|
0
|
100%
|
1
|
|
Tyne Crescent
|
19
|
12
|
63%
|
10
|
2
|
83%
|
2
|
|
Wanneroo Road
|
9
|
2
|
22%
|
0
|
2
|
0%
|
0
|
|
Watson Road
|
10
|
5
|
50%
|
2
|
3
|
40%
|
4
|
|
Wishart Loop
|
25
|
11
|
44%
|
4
|
7
|
36%
|
5
|
|
Unknown Location
|
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
|
0
|
|
SUB-TOTALS
|
763
|
361
|
47%
|
166
|
194
|
46%
|
83
|
|
Elsewhere Within City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Outside Wanneroo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
TOTALS
|
763
|
361
|
47%
|
166
|
194
|
46%
|
130
|
The percentages noted in the above table relate solely to
the survey. In reviewing the signatories to the petition received it was noted
that multiple signatures from a single residence were listed. Given the above
table is based on a single response per residence, of the 185 signatures noted
on the petition, 132 are residents of Regent Estates and the surrounding area
and originate from 83 residences that were also included in the survey. Of
these signatories, the majority had already forwarded a survey response
objecting to the closure. The remaining 53 signatures from 47 residences, are
from residents outside of the surveyed area, utilising Little Dimples Child
Care Centre and/or the Gospel Baptist Church. It is noted that both these
facilities are accessed from Backshall Place.
Comment
To ascertain the movement of traffic as a direct result of
the Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road partial road closure, the City conducted
traffic counts throughout Regents Estates to comparatively determine whether
the closure had performed as expected - Attachment 3 refers.
Furthermore, to ascertain the movement of through traffic as
a direct result of the Backshall Place/Ocean Reef Road partial road closure,
the City also completed an Origin/Destination Survey to comparatively
determine whether the closure had performed as expected -Attachment 4 refers.
Of the 31 residents on the Scenic Drive/Tyne Court
“cut through” route, 21 responded and 100% supported the
closure. Of the 28 residents on Backshall Place, 18 responded with
11 supporting the closure.
The results of the traffic counts and origin/destination
survey both show that the closure has reduced traffic volumes through Regents
Estates and reduced the amount of external traffic using the roads as a short
cut, with traffic volumes reflecting the modelling carried out. It is
considered that the trial closure has achieved the objective set by Council
when making the decision to implement the partial road closure.
Whilst the petition does represent additional users of the
road who do not support the closure remaining, they are largely residents of
the area included in the survey.
It is therefore recommended that the partial road closure,
as it currently exists, becomes permanent.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 permits a
local government to wholly or partially close a thoroughfare to the passage of
vehicles.
The procedure detailed in the Act for the
continued partial closure of the junction will require the proposal to be
advertised locally, inviting public comment and with a copy of the notice to be
forwarded to the Commissioner for Main Roads. Additionally the Emergency
Services, the Service Authorities and affected residents must be given written
notice, with a reasonable time allowed for making submissions. Any submissions
must then be considered by Council before the closure can take effect.
Given the resolution arising from Council’s
decision at its meeting 27 July 2010 (IN07-07/10 refers) that the trial closure
at the Ocean Reef Road/Backshall Place intersection remain in place until
October 2011, an extension of this closure is required in order to cover the
timeframe between advertisement and Council’s consideration of public
responses that may be received in relation to the permanent closure as
advertised. This will necessitate a further advertisement advising the
public of the extended period of closure, this extension being a maximum of 28
days allowable under the Act and would extend the trial closure to
28 November 2011.
It is noted that the sign on site reflects a trial
closure of 15 months following the implementation of the closure on site, hence
the indicated date of 25 November 2011 on the sign. In retrospect, this should
have reflected the Council resolution and indicated the date as being 31
October 2011.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
An amount of $50,000 has been included in the 2011/2012
Capital Works Program,
for the installation of traffic management treatments in Backshall Place and St
Fillans Bend, (PR–2273) subject to consideration by Council of the
outcome of the trial closure.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendations
That Council:-
1. NOTES
the results of the traffic counts, origin/destination survey, residents surveys
and Petition PT05-09/11;
2. REAFFIRMS
its support for the proposed turning restrictions at the junction of Backshall
Place and Ocean Reef Road to prevent access into Backshall Place from Ocean
Reef Road as shown in Attachment 1;
3. REQUESTS
Administration in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.50 of the Local
Government Act 1995, as amended, to publically advertise the permanent turning
restriction at the junction of Backshall Place and Ocean Reef Road to prevent
eastbound and westbound traffic on Ocean Reef Road from turning north into
Backshall Place for public comment, as shown in Attachment 1;
4. REQUESTS
Administration to prepare a report on the outcome of public advertisement for
consideration by Council as per Item 3;
5. APPROVES
an extension of the trial closure at the Ocean Reef Road/Backshall Place
intersection to 28 November 2011 in accordance with the Local Government
Act 1995 Section 3.50 as amended;
6. REQUESTS
Main Roads WA to investigate the impact on vehicle movements and traffic safety
of restrictions to right turning movements at the junction of Wanneroo Road and
Villanova Street; and
7. ADVISES
owners/occupiers of all properties in the area bounded by Wanneroo Road, San
Rosa Road, Yellagonga Regional Park and Ocean Reef Road of Council’s
decision.
8. ADVISES
the organiser of Petition PT05-09/11 of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Attachment 1
|
11/107643
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Attachment 2
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Attachment 3
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Attachment 4
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 215
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 216
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 219
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 220
IN05-10/11 PT01-05/11
Hinchinbrook Avenue, Ridgewood - Request for Traffic Calming
File Ref: 3125
– 11/107202
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a petition requesting traffic treatments on
Hinchinbrook Avenue, between Ridgewood Boulevard and Connolly Drive, Ridgewood.
Background
Council received petition PT01-05/11 at its meeting of 3 May
2011. The petition reads:
“We, the undersigned, all
being Residents of the City of Wanneroo do formally request Council’s
consideration:
- Excessive
speeds on Hinchinbrook Ave must be controlled.
- Suggested
introduction of S-Bend slow points between Ronsard and Shelburne Ave (near
park) and possibly another at the bottom of the hill near Connolly
Drive.”
The petition notes that “the residents
do not want speed humps”.
The petition was signed by 17 residents representing 12 of
the 23 residential properties fronting Hinchinbrook Avenue between Ridgewood
Boulevard and Connolly Drive.
A response to the petition was considered by Council at its
meeting on 26 July 2011 (Item IN04-07/11 refers) and lapsed for want of a mover
following a deputation of Hinchinbrook Avenue residents.
Detail
Hinchinbrook Avenue was constructed as a Neighbourhood
Connector in accordance with Agreed Structure Plan No.27 for Ridgewood.
Between Ridgewood Boulevard and Ronsard View, Hinchinbrook Avenue is
constructed as a boulevard with a 3m traffic lane, 1.2m bicycle lane in each
direction, and a 4m wide median. From Ronsard View to Connolly Drive the road
is constructed as a 7.4m wide single carriageway. As such it is capable
of carrying up to 7,000 vehicles per day, including commercial vehicles, and
has the potential to become a bus route. It is currently speed zoned at
50kph.
In response to the deputation at the July meeting, a second
traffic count was undertaken, with results noted as follows:
Traffic Data
Definitions:
AWT Average
Weekday Traffic
vpd vehicles
per day
85%ile speed the
speed at or below which 85% of vehicles are travelling.
20km/h Pace
the 20km/h speed range in which the majority of
vehicles are travelling
% in Pace percentage
of total vehicles travelling within the 20km/h Pace range
Traffic Count – Sept/Oct 2010
South of Ridgewood Boulevard, adjacent to Ronsard Park
– Traffic Counter Location 1 (TC1)
AWT 1054vpd
85%ile speed 60km/h
Max Speed 89km/h
20km/h Pace 34--56km/h
% in Pace 71.6%
Traffic Count 15-26 August 2011
South of Ridgewood Boulevard, adjacent to Ronsard Park
– Traffic Counter Location 1 (TC1)
AWT 694
vpd
85%ile speed 53
km/h
Max Speed 83.7
km/h
20km/h Pace 36
– 56 km/h
% in Pace 83.49%
Traffic Count – Sept/Oct 2010
East of Connolly Drive – Traffic Counter Location 2
(TC2)
AWT 2354vpd
85%ile speed 54
km/h
Max speed 92km/h
20km/h Pace 36
– 56 km/h
% in Pace 79.6%
Traffic Count 15-26 August 2011
East of Connolly Drive – Traffic Counter Location 2
(TC2)
AWT 2323
vpd
85%ile speed 54
km/h
Max speed 88.7
km/h
20km/h Pace 36
– 56 km/h
% in Pace 80.6%
Crash data provided by Main
Roads WA from the WA Police record that there has been one reported accident at
the intersection of Hinchinbrook Avenue and Ridgewood Boulevard during the five
years 2006 to 2010. There are no reported accidents over the same period
between Ridgewood Boulevard and Connolly Drive.
Refer to Attachment 1 for a location plan and Attachment
2 for an aerial view of the area and the location of traffic counters
respectively.
Consultation
This report was initially prepared as an outcome of a
petition received by Council at its meeting on 3 May 2011, and then reviewed in
follow up to a deputation of Hinchbrook Avenue residents at the Council meeting
on 26 July 2011.
Comment
To determine the justification and priority of any traffic
management works on Hinchinbrook Avenue the road was assessed in accordance
with the City’s Traffic Management Investigation and Intervention Policy
(TM Policy), which assesses roads against a range of criteria such as:
· Speed
· Traffic
volumes
· Crash
history
· Road
design and topography
· Vulnerable
road users - Pedestrians/Cyclists
The TM Policy requires a score of > 60 to qualify for
traffic management treatments, while scores between 30 and 60 points warrant
increased attention to law enforcement and driver education. The
assessment for Hinchinbrook Avenue, between Ridgewood Boulevard and Connolly
Drive, based on August 2011 traffic data collected, achieved a score of 14. The
original report advised a score of 26 based on traffic data collected
September/October 2010. This clearly indicates improving traffic behaviour over
the last 10-12 months.
While speeding does occur on Hinchinbrook Avenue, as it does
throughout the City, the new score reconfirms that the construction of traffic
management treatments at this location cannot be justified ahead of other
higher scoring projects that are yet to be funded.
It is proposed in this instance that speed enforcement needs
to be considered by the WA Police to enforce speed compliance for the minority
of drivers travelling above the default urban speed limit of 50km/h.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
The City’s TM Policy is applicable to the assessment
of the need for traffic treatments in Hinchinbrook Avenue.
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. DOES
NOT SUPPORT the construction of traffic treatments on Hinchinbrook Avenue,
Ridgewood;
2. REQUESTS
the WA Police to undertake speed enforcement of vehicles using
Hinchinbrook Avenue; and
3. ADVISES
the petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Hinchinbrook Avenue, Ridgewood - Request for Traffic
Calming - Location Map
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Hinchinbrook Avenue, Ridgewood - Request for Traffic
Calming - Aerial View
|
11/72358
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 225
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 226
IN06-10/11 PT02-06/11
Request Closure of Atley Pass, Carramar
File Ref: 3126
– 11/89278
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a petition requesting the closure of Atley Pass,
Carramar, to through traffic.
Background
Council, at its meeting on 28 June 2011, received petition
PT02-06/11. The petition reads:
“We the undersigned residents
would respectfully request the City of Wanneroo that Atley Pass Carramar be
closed off to through traffic in the middle close to the crossover through the
park. As drivers are using this road as a rat run to go through to the shopping
centre. This is causing severe problems to residents who reside in this
street.”
The petition has been signed by eight residents representing
five of the 26 residential properties in the subdivision accessed from Atley
Pass.
Detail
Atley Pass is a local access place providing property access
for a small subdivision located to the north of the Carramar Shopping Centre
and bounded by Rawlinna Parkway, Cheriton Drive, Millendon Street, and Houghton
Park and is not intended for transit traffic. An aerial view of the subject
site is shown at Attachment 1.
Atley Pass provides the principal north-south axis for the
subdivision with its main access at Rawlinna Parkway. A central turning hub is
located two thirds of the way along its length with radiating laneways
providing additional property access. From Rawlinna Parkway to the turning hub,
Atley Pass consists of a 6m wide carriageway, with parking embayments on either
side, all within a 15m wide road reserve. From the turning hub to Millendon
Street the carriageway reverts to a 6m wide laneway.
It has been observed that customers of the Carramar Shopping
Centre are using Atley Pass, between Millendon Street and Rawlinna Parkway, as
a rat run to bypass any congestion at the Rawlinna Parkway and Cheriton Drive
intersections at Joondalup Drive.
The construction of the second (dual) carriageway for
Joondalup Drive between St Stephens Crescent and Tumbleweed Drive incorporating
both the above intersections has recently been completed and should alleviate
congestion that has been experienced at these intersections.
Building licences have been issued for 16 of the 26 lots
within the subdivision, with 16 dwellings under construction and five of these
nearing completion.
Consultation
Owners of properties abutting the Atley Pass laneway have
contacted the City and Ward Councillors at various times, since purchasing
their lots, to express their concern at the volume of transit traffic.
Administration has acknowledged their concerns and indicated that:
“Ultimately, the limited
setback of the buildings along the lane will create a very different road
environment to the current open situation, which in itself will discourage some
through traffic.
However, it is anticipated
that during the housing construction phase the laneways will be congested with
trade vehicles and access to the subdivision for legitimate traffic will be at
a premium, which would be compounded if the City were to implement road
closures to deter through traffic. Due to this, the City proposes to wait until
the first homes are occupied and traffic flows become established before
developing a solution in consultation with owners”.
Comment
The petition calls for the closure of Atley Pass laneway at
its connection to the central hub, which will result in the four properties
served by the Atley Pass laneway being accessed from Millendon Street.
Administration believes all property owners in the subdivision should be
consulted to determine the necessity for a closure and if required the
preferred location for any closure, in full or part then determined.
While the proposal requests the closure of Atley Pass to
through traffic, it does not require the permanent closure of the road reserve.
Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 allows a local government, by
local public notice, to close a road to through traffic.
As indicated, building activities within the area have the
potential to restrict access through the development. The implementation
of a road closure could either impact on building activities or restrict
legitimate access to a property. It is therefore suggested that public
consultation not be commenced until the development of the area is at 80%
completion and the built form of the area is largely known.
Statutory
Compliance
Section 3.50 of the Local
Government Act 1995 controls the closure of public roads to vehicles, while
Part 2 of the (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 denotes the persons to
be notified of the closure.
The Director Infrastructure has
delegated authority to approve a road closure to through traffic. In this
instance, should an objection be received it is proposed to report back to
Council.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.4 Improve
community safety”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Advertising of proposed road closures is required by Section
3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 and funded from the Operating Budget.
The installation of bollards is estimated to cost $2,000, and
can be funded from Miscellaneous Traffic Management (PR-1948) for which the sum
of $40,000 has been allocated in the City’s 2011/2012 Capital Works
Budget.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. ENDORSES
Administration engaging in public consultation with the owners of the lots
within the subdivision bounded by Rawlinna Parkway, Cheriton Drive,
Millendon Street, and Houghton Park to determine the support for a closure of
Atley Pass, in full or part, and the preferred location of such a closure when
80% of the properties have been developed, with the results of the public
consultation to be reported back to Council; and
2. ADVISES
the petition organisers of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
PT02-06/11 Request Closure of Atley Pass, Carramar -
Aerial View
|
11/109577
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 230
Community Development
Nil
Corporate Strategy & Performance
Finance
CS01-10/11 Warrant
of Payments for the Period to 30 September 2011
File Ref: 1859
– 11/110001
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for
the month of September 2011, including a statement as to the total amounts
outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list
of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary
Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts
and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of
accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the
minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in September
2011
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
84486 - 84827
1361 - 1380
|
$1,455,598.15
$13,918,400.59
$15,373,998.74
($12,261.21)
($142,011.96)
$15,219,725.57
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Advance Recoup
Direct Payments
Payroll – Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$15,219,725.57
$50,880.91
$2,601,718.44
$17,872,324.92
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Cell 5
Cell 6
Cell 8
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$69,886.83
$3,342.60
$68,782.53
$142,011.96
|
At the close of September 2011 outstanding creditors
amounted to $1,179,220.00.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payments (cheques and electronic transfers) and
the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of September 2011
is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the
meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management)
Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the
accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end
and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after
each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the
prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the
month of September 2011, as summarised below:-
|
Funds
|
Vouchers
|
Amount
|
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Cheque Numbers
EFT Document Numbers
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques
Town Planning Scheme
RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND
|
84486 - 84827
1361 - 1380
|
$1,455,598.15
$13,918,400.59
$15,373,998.74
($12,261.21)
($142,011.96)
$15,219,725.57
|
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Advance Recoup
Direct Payments
Payroll – Direct Debits
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$15,219,725.57
$50,880.91
$2,601,718.44
$17,872,324.92
|
|
Town Planning Scheme
Accounts Paid – September 2011
Cell 5
Cell 6
Cell 8
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
|
|
$69,886.83
$3,342.60
$68,782.53
$142,011.96
|
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS
SEPTEMBER 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT
|
DATE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
AMOUNT
|
|
00084486
|
06/09/2011
|
Tribal Refugee Welfare of WA Inc
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084487
|
06/09/2011
|
G Fisher
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084488
|
06/09/2011
|
L McComb
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084489
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,126.30
|
|
00084490
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$715.26
|
|
00084491
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$812.05
|
|
00084492
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$149.80
|
|
00084493
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$93.00
|
|
00084494
|
06/09/2011
|
Naval Association of Australia Perth North
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding March 2011 - Navy Day And Remembrance Day
|
|
|
00084495
|
06/09/2011
|
R Matthews
|
$12.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Light Horse Trail - 24.08.2011 - Cancelled Program
|
|
|
00084496
|
06/09/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For J Gethin - D Cronin And A Beckett - U14s Australian National Fire Cadet
Championships - Myunda Bay NSW 4-7 October 2011
|
|
|
00084497
|
06/09/2011
|
ECU Joondalup Soccer Club
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For J Middleton, M Kirkby, S Pollard, S Fitzsimmons And A Jayakumar -
Volkswagen Junior Masters Australia Tournament - Sydney NSW 1-2 October 2011
|
|
|
00084498
|
06/09/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship
For L Dart, G Napier, C Richardson And T Cole - U16s Australasian National
Fire Cadet Championships - Myunda Bay NSW 4-7 October 2011
|
|
|
00084499
|
06/09/2011
|
Tribal Refugee Welfare of WA Inc
|
$718.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Hire Fees - Event Approval Withdrawn - Food Fetes - 30.07.2011-31.12.2011
|
|
|
00084500
|
06/09/2011
|
Tribal Refugee Welfare of WA Inc
|
$181.80
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Hire Fees - Event Approval Withdrawn - Fund Raising Dinner - 03.09.2011
|
|
|
00084501
|
06/09/2011
|
Australian Bureau of Statistics
|
$212.40
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Hire Fees - Paid Twice In Error - 11.07.2011 - Census Collector Training
Session
|
|
|
00084502
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$2,125.00
|
|
00084503
|
06/09/2011
|
Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084504
|
06/09/2011
|
Y Corby
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084505
|
06/09/2011
|
Joondalup Basketball Referees Association
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084506
|
06/09/2011
|
Bahais of Wanneroo
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084507
|
06/09/2011
|
C Furmark
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084508
|
06/09/2011
|
A Ford
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084509
|
06/09/2011
|
K Shah
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084510
|
06/09/2011
|
C Ingram
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084511
|
06/09/2011
|
WALGA
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084512
|
06/09/2011
|
Mums in Biz Inc
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084513
|
06/09/2011
|
Yanchep & Districts Country Womens Association
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084514
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084515
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$572.62
|
|
00084516
|
06/09/2011
|
Evyonne Nel
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00084517
|
06/09/2011
|
Clinton In't Veld
|
$57.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00084518
|
06/09/2011
|
Parents Without Partners (WA) Inc
|
$2,920.50
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding March 2011 - Motoring & Mentoring Project
|
|
|
00084519
|
06/09/2011
|
Stonewall Constructions
|
$4,592.20
|
|
|
|
Refund
Portion Of Fees Not Expended Processing Amendment 4 To The Drovers Place
Precinct Agreed Structure Plan No. 47 (Lots 810 & 811) Wanneroo Road
|
|
|
00084520
|
06/09/2011
|
Butler Netball Club
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084521
|
06/09/2011
|
J Dring
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084522
|
06/09/2011
|
N McCrory
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084523
|
06/09/2011
|
N Williams
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084524
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$9,000.00
|
|
00084525
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$195.69
|
|
00084526
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$174.02
|
|
00084527
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$604.35
|
|
00084528
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$379.63
|
|
00084529
|
06/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$306.07
|
|
00084530
|
06/09/2011
|
David Evans Real Estate
|
$375.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084531
|
06/09/2011
|
Hampton Senior High School
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084532
|
06/09/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$43.30
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084533
|
06/09/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$87.95
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084534
|
06/09/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$927.15
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance ($625.20)
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
00084535
|
06/09/2011
|
Accounts Services Petty Cash
|
$761.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084536
|
06/09/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$116.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084537
|
06/09/2011
|
Hainsworth Youth Services Petty Cash
|
$158.05
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084538
|
06/09/2011
|
Honeywell Secondhand Shop
|
$225.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084539
|
06/09/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$272.80
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084540
|
06/09/2011
|
Alexander Heights Community House Petty Cash
|
$34.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084541
|
06/09/2011
|
Landgate
|
$3,817.51
|
|
|
|
GRV INT
Valuations Metro And FESA - Rates
|
|
|
00084542
|
06/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$110.30
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084543
|
06/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$72.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084544
|
06/09/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$2,036.10
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance ($413.00)
|
|
|
|
|
Water Charges
For The City
|
|
|
00084545
|
06/09/2011
|
Yanchep Community House Petty Cash
|
$212.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084546
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084547
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084548
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084549
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084550
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084551
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084552
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084553
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084554
|
06/09/2011
|
Synergy
|
$100,248.45
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance ($86.90)
|
|
|
00084555
|
06/09/2011
|
Telstra
|
$239.98
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084556
|
06/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084557
|
06/09/2011
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$104.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084558
|
06/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$21.40
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084559
|
06/09/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$104.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084560
|
06/09/2011
|
Baker & Taylor
|
$46.03
|
|
|
|
Bookstock For
Library Services
|
|
|
00084561
|
06/09/2011
|
Dysons Packaging Pty Ltd
|
$748.00
|
|
|
|
Foam Cups -
Depot Stores
|
|
|
00084562
|
06/09/2011
|
International Conferences & Events
|
$2,665.00
|
|
|
|
Museums
Australia/Interpretation Australia 2011 Conference For Community Services
Employees
|
|
|
00084563
|
13/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$258.38
|
|
00084564
|
13/09/2011
|
J & S Celinkovic
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084565
|
13/09/2011
|
D Kennedy
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084566
|
13/09/2011
|
M Wright
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084567
|
13/09/2011
|
A & D Williams
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084568
|
13/09/2011
|
J & J McKenzie
|
$299.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084569
|
13/09/2011
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084570
|
13/09/2011
|
J Witheridge & J Pudelko
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084571
|
13/09/2011
|
I Hicks
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Araluen - 7 September 2011 - Cancelled Program Due To Family Matters
|
|
|
00084572
|
13/09/2011
|
M Reed
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Araluen - 7 September 2011 - Cancelled Program Due To Illness
|
|
|
00084573
|
13/09/2011
|
Department of Housing
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084574
|
13/09/2011
|
Hocking Primary School
|
$1,514.40
|
|
|
|
Refund
Overcharged For Pool Entry Education Department Swimming Lessons 631 Entries
@ $2.40
|
|
|
00084575
|
13/09/2011
|
Karen Hopkins
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084576
|
13/09/2011
|
Erich & Kay Von Dietze
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing
Subsidy
|
|
|
00084577
|
13/09/2011
|
Private
|
$365.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084578
|
13/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,175.98
|
|
00084579
|
13/09/2011
|
Private
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084580
|
13/09/2011
|
Urban WA Real Estate
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084581
|
13/09/2011
|
Cossill & Webley Pty Ltd
|
$1,039.45
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Proportion Of Fees Paid - Application Withdrawn
|
|
|
00084582
|
13/09/2011
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$2,575.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Development Application Fees - No Fees Payable As Public Works (Waste
Water Pump Station 2560 Marmion Avenue Alkimos)
|
|
|
00084583
|
13/09/2011
|
Philip Milton
|
$1,126.38
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Development Application Fee - Not Required
|
|
|
00084584
|
13/09/2011
|
East Wanneroo Primary School
|
$1,650.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding March 2011 Year 6 & 7 Trip To Canberra
|
|
|
00084585
|
13/09/2011
|
Children in Action Inc
|
$957.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Funding March 2011 Youth Camp
|
|
|
00084586
|
13/09/2011
|
T Matiu
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084587
|
13/09/2011
|
C Cotterell
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084588
|
13/09/2011
|
J Shean
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084589
|
13/09/2011
|
M Samuels-Stone
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084590
|
13/09/2011
|
A Suliman
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084591
|
13/09/2011
|
A Smith
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084592
|
13/09/2011
|
Eagles Junior Basketball
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084593
|
13/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Outcast Netball
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084594
|
13/09/2011
|
L May
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084595
|
13/09/2011
|
A McCauley
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084596
|
13/09/2011
|
Capricorn Society Limited
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084597
|
13/09/2011
|
Hodge Collard Preston Pty Ltd
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Refund
Liquor Licence 15 Ocean Keys Boulevard Clarkson Register No 80.2011.12.1
|
|
|
00084598
|
13/09/2011
|
Ian Braimbridge
|
$381.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Membership Cancelled - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00084599
|
13/09/2011
|
Zara Taurus
|
$47.94
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Direct Debit Membership Original Cheque Was To Wrong Member - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00084600
|
13/09/2011
|
Perth Home Care Services
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084601
|
13/09/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$49.95
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084602
|
13/09/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$494.35
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
00084603
|
13/09/2011
|
AMP Flexible Lifetime Super Fund
|
$2,087.36
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084604
|
13/09/2011
|
Fines Enforcement Registry
|
$860.00
|
|
|
|
Lodgement
X 20 Infringement Notice Records - Rangers
|
|
|
00084605
|
13/09/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$33.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084606
|
13/09/2011
|
Honeywell Secondhand Shop
|
$175.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084607
|
13/09/2011
|
Landgate
|
$3,570.24
|
|
|
|
Mining
Tenements Chargeable - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Unimproved
Valuations Chargeable - Rating Services
|
|
|
00084608
|
13/09/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$4,477.45
|
|
|
|
Water Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
00084609
|
13/09/2011
|
Zurich Client Service
|
$404.72
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084610
|
13/09/2011
|
Synergy
|
$376,738.95
|
|
|
|
Power Charges
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance ($420.00)
|
|
|
|
|
Streetlighting
23.07.11 - 24.08.11
|
|
|
00084611
|
13/09/2011
|
Telstra
|
$6,241.94
|
|
|
|
Bigpond/Phone
Charges For The City
|
|
|
00084612
|
13/09/2011
|
Western Power
|
$227,373.00
|
|
|
|
Mirrabooka
Avenue Landsdale Extension Power Relocations - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
00084613
|
13/09/2011
|
Navigator Applications Account
|
$144.55
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084614
|
13/09/2011
|
Janice Lewis
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Payment - Quinns Adult Day Centre
|
|
|
00084615
|
13/09/2011
|
Hostplus Superannuation Fund
|
$1,161.17
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084616
|
13/09/2011
|
Australian Super
|
$5,760.30
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084617
|
13/09/2011
|
MLC Nominees Pty Limited
|
$1,232.88
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084618
|
13/09/2011
|
Roy Bastick
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Payment - Community Bus Driver
|
|
|
00084619
|
13/09/2011
|
The Industry Superannuation Fund
|
$366.48
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084620
|
13/09/2011
|
Integra Super
|
$439.24
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084621
|
13/09/2011
|
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund
|
$50.42
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084622
|
13/09/2011
|
MTAA Superannuation Fund
|
$342.52
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084623
|
13/09/2011
|
Australiansuper
|
$2,580.01
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084624
|
13/09/2011
|
Rest Superannuation
|
$3,127.69
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084625
|
13/09/2011
|
Asgard Elements Super
|
$121.92
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084626
|
13/09/2011
|
Hospitality Petty Cash
|
$999.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084627
|
13/09/2011
|
Unisuper Limited
|
$770.31
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084628
|
13/09/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$214.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084629
|
13/09/2011
|
Hesta Super Fund
|
$1,637.27
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084630
|
13/09/2011
|
Colonial First State Firstchoice
|
$1,841.69
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084631
|
13/09/2011
|
Care Super
|
$329.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084632
|
13/09/2011
|
Spectrum Super
|
$746.82
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084633
|
13/09/2011
|
Media Super
|
$444.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084634
|
13/09/2011
|
BT Super For Life
|
$402.72
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084635
|
13/09/2011
|
Telstra Superannuation Scheme
|
$718.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084636
|
13/09/2011
|
Amist Super
|
$351.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084637
|
13/09/2011
|
Valdor Superannuation Fund
|
$201.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084638
|
13/09/2011
|
Vision Super Pty Ltd
|
$411.52
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084639
|
13/09/2011
|
ANZ Banking Group Ltd
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Audit
Certificate Fee - Finance
|
|
|
00084640
|
13/09/2011
|
Recruitmentsuper
|
$688.40
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084641
|
13/09/2011
|
Macquarie Investment Management Ltd
|
$103.12
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084642
|
13/09/2011
|
Superwrap - Personal Super Plan
|
$88.97
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084643
|
13/09/2011
|
Construction & Building Unions
|
$325.19
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084644
|
13/09/2011
|
Asteron Optimum - Suncorp Master Trust
|
$394.75
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084645
|
13/09/2011
|
Plum Superannuation Fund
|
$434.03
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084646
|
13/09/2011
|
Gary Bowell Super Fund
|
$467.95
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084647
|
13/09/2011
|
Perpetual Wealth Focus Super Plan
|
$342.52
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084648
|
13/09/2011
|
Statewide Superannuation Trust
|
$525.56
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084649
|
13/09/2011
|
OnePath Life Limited
|
$386.96
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084650
|
13/09/2011
|
Catholic Super
|
$635.88
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deductions
|
|
|
00084651
|
13/09/2011
|
John Harry Wright
|
$78.58
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Fuel WN32662 - Absence Of Fuel Card - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
00084652
|
13/09/2011
|
Big Sky Entertainment WA
|
$1,430.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
By Hollywood Heroes At WLCC - Heritage And Museum Services
|
|
|
00084653
|
13/09/2011
|
Morna-Dawn Jacobs - WA Computer
|
$1,100.00
|
|
|
|
Computer
Training Manuals - Library Services
|
|
|
00084654
|
13/09/2011
|
City of Wanneroo
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Cash
Advance For Book Sale 18.09.2011 - Library Services
|
|
|
00084655
|
13/09/2011
|
YHI Power Pty Ltd
|
$1,248.83
|
|
|
|
Delkor Battery -
Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
00084656
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$985.06
|
|
00084657
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$908.39
|
|
00084658
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$925.84
|
|
00084659
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$838.61
|
|
00084660
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$345.00
|
|
00084661
|
20/09/2011
|
C O'Keefe
|
$6.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00084662
|
20/09/2011
|
R Pedretti
|
$18.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Paid Twice
|
|
|
00084663
|
20/09/2011
|
A Hayden
|
$12.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00084664
|
20/09/2011
|
M Cotton
|
$12.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00084665
|
20/09/2011
|
J Burchell
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00084666
|
20/09/2011
|
N Bell
|
$57.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilized
|
|
|
00084667
|
20/09/2011
|
A Moulding
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration Rebate - Sterilisation
|
|
|
00084668
|
20/09/2011
|
Professionals Executive Coastal
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00084669
|
20/09/2011
|
Stephanie O'Dea
|
$162.50
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Pre Employment Medical Costs - HR
|
|
|
00084670
|
20/09/2011
|
Renee Bussche
|
$413.77
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata Refund - Aquamotion
|
|
|
00084671
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$604.90
|
|
00084672
|
20/09/2011
|
D & M Montgomery
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084673
|
20/09/2011
|
M & T Bruce
|
$106.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084674
|
20/09/2011
|
M Bell
|
$311.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084675
|
20/09/2011
|
J De Senneville
|
$258.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084676
|
20/09/2011
|
A Mercer
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084677
|
20/09/2011
|
J Butt
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084678
|
20/09/2011
|
Woodhouse Legal
|
$1,800.00
|
|
|
|
Refund - Charity Golf Day - Paid Twice
|
|
|
00084679
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,294.80
|
|
00084680
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$3,887.38
|
|
00084681
|
20/09/2011
|
Thornlie Christian College Open Day
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084682
|
20/09/2011
|
J Aguilar
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084683
|
20/09/2011
|
Department of Education
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084684
|
20/09/2011
|
Dawson Summers
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Sponsorship For In The Australian Little League
Championships 26 - 29 May 2011 Surfers Paradise
|
|
|
00084685
|
20/09/2011
|
Total Body Nutrition
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084686
|
20/09/2011
|
R Dodhia
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084687
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$116.65
|
|
00084688
|
20/09/2011
|
Rebecca Feakes
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084689
|
20/09/2011
|
Patricia Neves
|
$325.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy
|
|
|
00084690
|
20/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,526.94
|
|
00084691
|
20/09/2011
|
Professional Adrian Cocks Real Estate
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00084692
|
20/09/2011
|
David Evans Real Estate
|
$350.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00084693
|
20/09/2011
|
Calrach Pty Ltd
|
$726.00
|
|
|
|
Farm Visit For Kidfest At Buckingham House 13.11.11
|
|
|
00084694
|
20/09/2011
|
Put On Happy Face - Face Painting
|
$432.00
|
|
|
|
2 X Face Painters For Kidfest At Buckingham House 13.11.11
|
|
|
00084695
|
20/09/2011
|
Southern Cross Bush Band
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Entertainment At Kidfest Buckingham House 13.11.11
|
|
|
00084696
|
20/09/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$46.70
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084697
|
20/09/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance
|
|
|
00084698
|
20/09/2011
|
Construction Training Fund
|
$86,124.56
|
|
|
|
Levy Collections 01.08.11 - 31.08.11 - Finance
|
|
|
00084699
|
20/09/2011
|
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$118.80
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084700
|
20/09/2011
|
Museum Petty Cash
|
$23.75
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084701
|
20/09/2011
|
Mr Evan Martin
|
$121.00
|
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment
|
|
|
00084702
|
20/09/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$74.20
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084703
|
20/09/2011
|
Rangers & Safety Services Petty Cash
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Float For Lynette Greer
|
|
|
00084704
|
20/09/2011
|
Landgate
|
$4,791.07
|
|
|
|
GRV Int Valuations Metro Shared And FESA 20.08.2011-
02.09.2011 - Rates
|
|
|
00084705
|
20/09/2011
|
Water Corporation
|
$5,463.30
|
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City
|
|
|
00084706
|
20/09/2011
|
Synergy
|
$13,610.10
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City
|
|
|
|
|
2 x Financial Assistance $350.00
|
|
|
00084707
|
20/09/2011
|
Telstra
|
$12,499.96
|
|
|
|
Internet Charges For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City
|
|
|
00084708
|
20/09/2011
|
Mrs Jennifer Martin
|
$106.50
|
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment/Tennis Booking Officer
|
|
|
00084709
|
20/09/2011
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington
|
$430.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payments
|
|
|
00084710
|
20/09/2011
|
Zurich Aust Insurance Ltd
|
$1,000.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess Payment WN33092
|
|
|
00084711
|
20/09/2011
|
Mr Abdulla Adam
|
$137.40
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Parking Fees
|
|
|
00084712
|
20/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$21.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084713
|
20/09/2011
|
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash
|
$105.45
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084714
|
20/09/2011
|
Butler Community Centre Petty Cash
|
$101.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084715
|
20/09/2011
|
Ms Jodie Walter
|
$48.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment
|
|
|
00084716
|
20/09/2011
|
Mr Gerald Savage
|
$48.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment
|
|
|
00084717
|
20/09/2011
|
Venetia Donnellan
|
$164.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment/Tennis Booking Officer
|
|
|
00084718
|
20/09/2011
|
Cr Dorothy Newton
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance
|
|
|
00084719
|
25/09/2011
|
Baker & Taylor
|
$79.41
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Library
- Book Stock
|
|
|
00084720
|
25/09/2011
|
CBC Australia Pty Ltd
|
$2,148.74
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Bearing Unit For
Fleet
|
|
|
00084721
|
25/09/2011
|
CD's Confectionery Wholesalers
|
$330.29
|
|
|
|
Confectionery
For Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
00084722
|
25/09/2011
|
David Caddy
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
Author Talk At
Yanchep/Two Rocks Library
|
|
|
00084723
|
25/09/2011
|
Foo Hua Chinese Restaurant
|
$70.00
|
|
|
|
Catering
- Volunteer Meals For Incident At Pinjar - Fire Services
|
|
|
00084724
|
25/09/2011
|
Freehills
|
$351.56
|
|
|
|
Audit
Certificate For Period To 24.08.11 - Finance
|
|
|
00084725
|
25/09/2011
|
Fremantle Children's Literature Centre
|
$827.60
|
|
|
|
Performance
For Children's Book Week 2011
|
|
|
00084726
|
25/09/2011
|
G & S Maintenance
|
$3,080.00
|
|
|
|
Various Works
For Waste Services
|
|
|
00084727
|
25/09/2011
|
Handy Hoges Maintenance
|
$999.00
|
|
|
|
Replacement
Of Letterbox Destroyed In Bulk Bin Collection
|
|
|
00084728
|
25/09/2011
|
Kambos
|
$853.00
|
|
|
|
2 Coffee
Machines With Extended Warranty
|
|
|
00084729
|
25/09/2011
|
Logiudice Property Group
|
$476.40
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
Admin Fund Levy - 01.10.2011-31.12.2011 - Property
|
|
|
00084730
|
25/09/2011
|
Mainform Corporation Pty Ltd T/A Jo
|
$10,989.00
|
|
|
|
Install
Safety Barrier - Mirrabooka/Kingsway Roundabout - Projects
|
|
|
00084731
|
25/09/2011
|
Marevic Enterprises Pty Ltd
|
$623.00
|
|
|
|
Parks
Infrastructure Maintenance - Various
|
|
|
00084732
|
25/09/2011
|
McArthur
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
One
Copy Of National Remuneration Survey 2010 - 2011 - Human Resources
|
|
|
00084733
|
25/09/2011
|
Reliable Fencing
|
$12,732.06
|
|
|
|
Fencing
Works At Various Locations For Projects/Parks/Conservation
|
|
|
00084734
|
25/09/2011
|
Sandstone Garden Features
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Limestone Paving
- Parks
|
|
|
00084735
|
25/09/2011
|
Sensis Pty Ltd
|
$129.80
|
|
|
|
Yellow Pages
Directory Advertising 2012
|
|
|
00084736
|
25/09/2011
|
Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
|
$2,363.44
|
|
|
|
Long
Service Leave Recovery Previous Employer - Milton Brooks - HR
|
|
|
00084737
|
25/09/2011
|
State Library of WA
|
$1,850.20
|
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged
Book Charges
|
|
|
00084738
|
25/09/2011
|
The University of Western Australia
|
$423.50
|
|
|
|
Parks
Maintenance - Turtle Project Shino Hamada Chelodina Oblonga - Wetlands
|
|
|
00084739
|
25/09/2011
|
WA Limestone Company
|
$113,504.44
|
|
|
|
Limestone
Products For Various Locations - Infrastructure
|
|
|
00084740
|
25/09/2011
|
Wanneroo IGA
|
$305.08
|
|
|
|
Catering
Supplies For Various Departments
|
|
|
00084741
|
25/09/2011
|
Worksense
|
$3,905.62
|
|
|
|
Gloves/Uniform
Stock For Stores
|
|
|
00084742
|
25/09/2011
|
YHI Power Pty Ltd
|
$172.26
|
|
|
|
Battery For
Stores
|
|
|
00084743
|
23/09/2011
|
Department of Transport Payment Centre
|
$151.90
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084744
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$93.00
|
|
00084745
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$226.90
|
|
00084746
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,401.37
|
|
00084747
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,380.53
|
|
00084748
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$1,315.06
|
|
00084749
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$795.60
|
|
00084750
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$571.69
|
|
00084751
|
28/09/2011
|
Vodafone Pty Ltd
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084752
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$670.08
|
|
00084753
|
28/09/2011
|
A Taylor
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised
|
|
|
00084754
|
28/09/2011
|
A Taylor
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Sterilised Rebate
|
|
|
00084755
|
28/09/2011
|
B McCarthy
|
$28.50
|
|
|
|
Dog Registration
Refund - Deceased
|
|
|
00084756
|
28/09/2011
|
Hollywood Private Hospital
|
$50.00
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial
Assistance
|
|
|
00084757
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$3,386.37
|
|
00084758
|
28/09/2011
|
Quinns District Amateur Football Club
|
$575.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084759
|
28/09/2011
|
Robert Palmer
|
$9.50
|
|
|
|
Refund
- Fishing 28.09.11 Program Cancelled
|
|
|
00084760
|
28/09/2011
|
R Jones
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084761
|
28/09/2011
|
S Naughton
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084762
|
28/09/2011
|
J Middleton
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084763
|
28/09/2011
|
S Desai
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084764
|
28/09/2011
|
G Graham
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084765
|
28/09/2011
|
M Kennedy
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084766
|
28/09/2011
|
Australian Anglo Burmese Society Inc
|
$740.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084767
|
28/09/2011
|
S Patel
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084768
|
28/09/2011
|
Yanchep Junior Cricket Club
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084769
|
28/09/2011
|
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084770
|
28/09/2011
|
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084771
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$732.10
|
|
00084772
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$802.00
|
|
00084773
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$570.22
|
|
00084774
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$94.16
|
|
00084775
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$579.10
|
|
00084776
|
28/09/2011
|
Yanchep Districts Junior Football Club
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084777
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$222.34
|
|
00084778
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$298.07
|
|
00084779
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$583.55
|
|
00084780
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$585.03
|
|
00084781
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$732.10
|
|
00084782
|
28/09/2011
|
The Cancer Council of WA
|
$330.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084783
|
28/09/2011
|
K J S Kids Care
|
$59.00
|
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084784
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$587.99
|
|
00084785
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$2,590.75
|
|
00084786
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$596.14
|
|
00084787
|
28/09/2011
|
Shailee Desai
|
$90.80
|
|
|
|
Refund
Of Hire Fees Due To Cancellation Of Booking
|
|
|
00084788
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$586.51
|
|
00084789
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$586.51
|
|
00084790
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$606.60
|
|
00084791
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$371.28
|
|
00084792
|
28/09/2011
|
D Weston
|
$475.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084793
|
28/09/2011
|
S Desai
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Bond Refund
|
|
|
00084794
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$152.74
|
|
00084795
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$271.52
|
|
00084796
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$742.55
|
|
00084797
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$721.64
|
|
00084798
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$648.42
|
|
00084799
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$753.02
|
|
00084800
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$805.31
|
|
00084801
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$574.66
|
|
00084802
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$360.82
|
|
00084803
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$815.76
|
|
00084804
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$307.84
|
|
00084805
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$596.14
|
|
00084806
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$700.72
|
|
00084807
|
28/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084808
|
28/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084809
|
28/09/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
$313.77
|
|
00084810
|
28/09/2011
|
Aboriginal Seniors Group Petty Cash
|
$49.85
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084811
|
28/09/2011
|
Alexander Heights Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$47.90
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084812
|
28/09/2011
|
Alinta Gas
|
$3,212.55
|
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
4 x Financial
Assistance $352.70
|
|
|
00084813
|
28/09/2011
|
Commonwealth Bank Wanneroo
|
$146,097.00
|
|
|
|
Bank
Cheque Made Out To: Norton Rose Trust Account - Account In Payment Of:
GST Payment, Compensation Of Land "Taken" From Lot 6 (359)
Gnangara Road
|
|
|
00084814
|
28/09/2011
|
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash
|
$44.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084815
|
28/09/2011
|
Hainsworth Youth Services Petty Cash
|
$47.60
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084816
|
28/09/2011
|
Facility Officer WLCC Petty Cash
|
$31.20
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084817
|
28/09/2011
|
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash
|
$174.10
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084818
|
28/09/2011
|
Landgate
|
$2,372.22
|
|
|
|
Gross
Rental Valuations 03.09.11 - 16.09.11 Rating Services
|
|
|
00084819
|
28/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash
|
$48.55
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084820
|
28/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Youth Centre Petty Cash
|
$105.35
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084821
|
28/09/2011
|
Synergy
|
$24,644.45
|
|
|
|
Power Supplies
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
7 x Financial
Assistance $1,923.20
|
|
|
00084822
|
28/09/2011
|
Telstra
|
$108,193.33
|
|
|
|
2 x Financial
Assistance $301.07
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation
Of Services Sydney Road, Hawkins Road & Joondalup Drive - Infrastructure
Projects
|
|
|
00084823
|
28/09/2011
|
Clarkson Library Petty Cash
|
$30.25
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084824
|
28/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084825
|
28/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
00084826
|
28/09/2011
|
Wanneroo Adult Day Centre Petty Cash
|
$29.00
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
00084827
|
28/09/2011
|
Finance Services Petty Cash
|
$207.50
|
|
|
|
Petty Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - Cheques
|
$1,455,598.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER
LISTING
|
|
00001361
|
01/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
DME Contractors
|
$181,451.38
|
|
|
|
Planting
Of Native Tubestock Conservation Reserve Lake Badgerup
|
|
|
|
|
Planting
Of Native Tubestock Alverex, Caporn & Spring Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Planting Of
Native Tubestock Compass Park
|
|
|
|
|
Planting Of
Native Tubestock Appleby Park
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Innovations
|
$34,236.29
|
|
|
|
Payment
Claim # 2 - Supply And Installation Of Irrigation At Edgar Griffith Reserve -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001362
|
06/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel
|
$4,356.77
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Cardiactive Pty Ltd-Health On The Move
|
$4,400.00
|
|
|
|
Skin Cancer
Screening - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police
|
$30.00
|
|
|
|
Accident
Report # 2010A023871 - Waste Services
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Counsellors Association WA
|
$1,190.00
|
|
|
|
Membership
- A Adam, H Gordon, S Kokir, J Ecclestone, V Ledesma, P Thompson, G Poulter
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services
|
$6,558.10
|
|
|
|
Location Of
Services For Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$2,208.80
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Logo Appointments
|
$1,353.77
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour -
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$122,921.85
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$682.56
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services - May 2011 - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plant Farm
|
$742.50
|
|
|
|
Plants For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001363
|
06/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
DME Contractors
|
$1,757.80
|
|
|
|
Payment
Claim # 2 - Schedule 1B - Weed Management & Control - Various Parks -
Infrastructure Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001364
|
06/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$267.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$893.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$339,138.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$48.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,890.24
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$3,870.44
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$782.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$381.25
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$1,964.25
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,175.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Wendy Stewart
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
Payment - Volunteer Driver
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Pasqualino Bracone
|
$69.90
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Catering During Directorate Administration Tour Wednesday 24.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$6,608.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$343.07
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001365
|
13/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$362.52
|
|
|
|
First Aid
Supplies - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$1,362.47
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz
|
$9,900.00
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$1,087.68
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police
|
$218.50
|
|
|
|
Volunteer
National Police Checks July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Different By Design
|
$795.00
|
|
|
|
On-Site
Graphic Design Services - Communication & Events
|
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd
|
$704.55
|
|
|
|
Parts Washer
Service & Rental - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Gliderol
|
$840.00
|
|
|
|
Deposit
To Replace Damaged Roller Door At 189 Celebration Boulevard Clarkson - Waste
Services
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre
|
$1,705.00
|
|
|
|
Cost
To Replace & Repair Guttering At U1 26 Clara Link Butler
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$40,107.48
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited
|
$195.00
|
|
|
|
Folding
Table For Museum Playground - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
Logo Appointments
|
$1,895.86
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour -
Accounts Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$361,567.68
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd
|
$1,373.35
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$50,548.07
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
SMB Electrical Services
|
$11,000.00
|
|
|
|
Final
Claim - Wanneroo Showgrounds Phase 4 - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$825.00
|
|
|
|
Additional Works
- Carramar Golf Course
|
|
|
|
|
Water Dynamics
|
$66,000.00
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim # 1 - Supply And Installation Of Irrigation At Butterworth Reserve
Wanneroo - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001366
|
13/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd
|
$174,326.99
|
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For
August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001367
|
13/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curnow Group Pty Ltd
|
$24,989.46
|
|
|
|
Camira
Way Beach Access Quinns Rocks Progress Payment 1
|
|
|
|
|
DME Contractors
|
$71,228.05
|
|
|
|
Planting
Native Tubestock - Hartman Drive, Lake Badgerup And Mirrabooka Avenue -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic
Management - Planting - Weed Control - Pinjar Road - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Midland Construction Pty Ltd
|
$86,232.98
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Showground Clubrooms Contract 01008 - Release Of 50% Retention Sum
|
|
|
|
|
Progress
Payment 11 - Wanneroo Showground Clubrooms - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001368
|
13/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post
|
$15,246.38
|
|
|
|
Billpay
Transaction Fees August 2011 - Rating Services
|
|
|
|
|
Postage
Charges - August 2011 Lodgements
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$11,165.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Barlow Superannuation Fund
|
$3,410.08
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens
|
$426.42
|
|
|
|
Councillors
Travel Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd
|
$1,793.26
|
|
|
|
Mailroom
Services - Monthly Contract Fee - August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan & Crosbie Pro Golf WA Pty Ltd
|
$27,147.72
|
|
|
|
Marangaroo
Golf Course Submissions - Green Fee Commissions & Range Commissions 01-31
August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
FESA
|
$3,987,088.64
|
|
|
|
2011/12
ESL Quarter 1 In Accordance With The Fire & Emergency Service Authority
Of WA Act 1998
|
|
|
|
|
Generations Personal Super
|
$272.95
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Locke Pty Ltd
|
$2,978.14
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
John Everitt Superannuation Fund
|
$175.32
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking
|
$4,021.11
|
|
|
|
Insurance
- Motor Vehicle 26.08.11 - 30.06.2012
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$17.40
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Brent Sciaresa
|
$387.60
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Study Assistance - Building Legislation 1 - Building Services
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Philip Williams
|
$1,101.42
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Expenses While Attending International Public Works Conference 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund
|
$183.24
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Claystone Superannuation Fund
|
$320.98
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The FIA Magid Superannuation Fund
|
$399.68
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Michael Penson Superannuation Fund
|
$761.54
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
The Saunders Superannuation Fund-Pac
|
$124.67
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Timms Superannuation Fund
|
$217.08
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$347.67
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Govt Superannuation
|
$442,634.95
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001369
|
14/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning
|
$5,672.00
|
|
|
|
Application
Fees Accepted By The City On Behalf Of The Development Assessment Panel
Regulations 2011 - Name Of Applicant - T&Z Architects
|
|
|
|
|
DG & MJ Le Cerf
|
$9,696.75
|
|
|
|
Expenditure
Payment & Contract Management Fee August 2011 - Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001370
|
14/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$1,268,327.90
|
|
|
|
Progress
Payment 4 - Ocean Reef Road - Stage 2 Upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001371
|
20/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel
|
$1,888.92
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Community Arts Network WA Ltd
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Membership
Renewal For K Gough And D Tweedie - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$30,510.99
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$31,893.92
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$775.50
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001372
|
20/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
VDM Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$1,466,877.58
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim 5 - Ocean Reef Road Extension Stage 2 - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001373
|
20/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
$1,223,415.00
|
|
|
|
Products
& Services Charge - Gnangara & Sydney Wangara - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001374
|
20/09/2011
|
Connolly Building Company
|
$40,078.07
|
|
|
|
Progress
Payment 2 - Houghton Park Amentities Building - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001375
|
20/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Heerkens
|
$240.00
|
|
|
|
Volunteer -
Community Bus Driver
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post
|
$9,400.09
|
|
|
|
Postage Charges
For The City August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Library & Information Association
|
$672.00
|
|
|
|
Community
Programs - Library Tours - Clarkson
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Membership For 2011/2012
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union
|
$267.80
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union
|
$731.60
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office
|
$333,291.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
CFMEU WA Branch
|
$48.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$1,775.50
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates
|
$3,800.44
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$758.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer
|
$51.75
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
May 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie
|
$135.24
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani
|
$48.40
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Hamilton
|
$96.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$637.55
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Johnson
|
$203.30
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment/Tennis Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance
|
$1,905.55
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo
|
$106.50
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment/Tennis Booking Officer
|
|
|
|
|
LGIS Workcare
|
$236,484.60
|
|
|
|
Insurance
- Anywhere In Western Australia Claims paid as at 30.06.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
- Anywhere In Australia
Claims paid as at
30.06.2011
|
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU
|
$2,192.40
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Mr John Baker
|
$72.60
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Fung Kuen Lucia Lam
|
$35.00
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
For Broadband Usage Period 1 Aug - 31 Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Peggy Brown
|
$96.80
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging
|
$7,041.17
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$163.82
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Australia WA Division Inc
|
$1,772.00
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Membership Subscription - Daniel Simms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001376
|
20/09/2011
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001377
|
20/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates
|
$266.66
|
|
|
|
Rates Deductions
For Councillors
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Alan Edwin Blencowe
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Anh Truong
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Monks
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Ian Goodenough
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Laura Gwendolyn Gray
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Maureen Grierson
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Rudi Steffens
|
$400.00
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Stuart Mackenzie
|
$583.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Tracey Roberts
|
$1,833.33
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001378
|
25/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abrasiflex Pty Ltd
|
$210.43
|
|
|
|
Examination
Gloves Nitrile - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
ABS Osborne Park
|
$638.00
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Academy Clothing
|
$99.00
|
|
|
|
Uniforms For
Ranger Services
|
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies
|
$1,508.78
|
|
|
|
First Aid
Supplies For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Acclaimed Catering
|
$1,313.68
|
|
|
|
Catering
- Council Dinner 23.8.2011 - Marketing And Events
|
|
|
|
|
Accord Security Pty Ltd
|
$105,480.37
|
|
|
|
Safety
Patrol Services - July/August 2011 - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service
|
$37.50
|
|
|
|
Locking
Services - Cupboard Locks For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Adcorp Marketing Communications
|
$8,834.32
|
|
|
|
Advertising For
Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Tailoring Company
|
$3,337.95
|
|
|
|
Uniforms For
Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Adform
|
$1,784.20
|
|
|
|
Engraved
Plaques For Presentation Shields & Silver Door Sign For Phill Hay
|
|
|
|
|
Lockable
Display Cabinet - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Reflective
Bushfire Helmet Names - Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Nursery
|
$2,684.00
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Waste Solutions Pty Ltd
|
$2,511.86
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative Paving
|
$5,236.00
|
|
|
|
Paving To
Walburgh Drive Carramar
|
|
|
|
|
Air Communications
|
$19,222.50
|
|
|
|
Annual
Maintenance Renewal - Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd
|
$673.16
|
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder
Hire - Department
|
|
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia
|
$382.49
|
|
|
|
Parts For
Stores/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers
|
$270.00
|
|
|
|
Flower
Arrangement & Delivery For Cr Maureen Grierson - Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
For Basil Faranda – Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
Flowers
For Dianne Daniels – Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
All Park Products
|
$5,088.60
|
|
|
|
Two
Promenade Tables For Civic Centre - Infrastructure Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Ambit Industries Pty Ltd
|
$3,035.00
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Fence At Ashby Operation Centre - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$5,778.89
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Pty Ltd
|
$751.30
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Animal Pest Management Services
|
$1,606.00
|
|
|
|
Fox
Control At Landsdale Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
APS Physiotherapy
|
$253.00
|
|
|
|
Medical Charges
For HR
|
|
|
|
|
Araluen Botanic Park
|
$138.00
|
|
|
|
Park
Entries For Gold Program - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Armaguard
|
$273.52
|
|
|
|
Kingsway - Cash
Collection
|
|
|
|
|
Ashdene
|
$164.98
|
|
|
|
Assorted
Retail Items For Museum - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram
|
$852.58
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply
|
$1,924.98
|
|
|
|
Towels
Graffiti & Paint Remover - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Ausrecords
|
$582.56
|
|
|
|
Parts Tube Clip Set -
IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority
|
$1,388.00
|
|
|
|
Apparatus
Licence Renewal Fees - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Licence Renewal
- IT
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management
|
$5,197.50
|
|
|
|
Training
- Word Intermediate V7 - 16.08.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Training -
PowerPoint Introduction 09.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Training - Word
Intermediate 23.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Laboratory Services Pty Ltd
|
$2,662.00
|
|
|
|
Oil Sample
Bottles - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Paper Recovery Pty Ltd
|
$106.70
|
|
|
|
Detention
On Container - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Plant Wholesalers/Lullfitz
|
$1,876.05
|
|
|
|
Plants -
Citizenship Ceremony
|
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty Ltd
|
$1,974.00
|
|
|
|
Forklift
Training Course To WorkSafe Certification 11.08.2011 - Wangara Recycling
Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel
|
$2,115.52
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro
|
$564.30
|
|
|
|
Truck Steam -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Battery World
|
$72.00
|
|
|
|
Panasonic
Alkaline Battery - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
BBC Entertainment
|
$2,915.00
|
|
|
|
Co3
Band To Perform For Volunteers Function - Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Performer
Adrian Barich To MC Volunteers Function - Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
BCA Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$841.50
|
|
|
|
Consultancy -
Banksia Room Modifications Civic Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres
|
$32,005.23
|
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Belair Smash Repairs Pty Ltd
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess
- WN33110/WN32487
|
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries
|
$7,748.27
|
|
|
|
Plants - Parks
Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Beryl Weston
|
$60.00
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Girrawheen Hall - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd
|
$880.00
|
|
|
|
Power
Upgrade And Area Lighting Electrical Consulting Services - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Betahose & Fittings P/L
|
$6,186.63
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Hoses/Fittings For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bev Manning
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Aerobics
Instruction - Yanchep Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd
|
$913.99
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Student Citizenship Pewter Medallion
|
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd
|
$10,317.95
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Items For Various Project Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Bosnar Engineering Pty Ltd
|
$792.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs -
Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden Tree Consultancy
|
$308.00
|
|
|
|
Report
For Verge Tree At 48 Golf Links Drive Carramar 26.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Good & Associates
|
$9,333.83
|
|
|
|
Aboriginal
Consultants Fees & Expenses In Relation To Aboriginal Heritage Survey Of
Proposed Lagoon Redevelopment
|
|
|
|
|
Brikmakers
|
$741.90
|
|
|
|
Sandstone Pavers
- Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
BT Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$1,939.24
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd
|
$3,366.31
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Burkeair Pty Ltd
|
$8,872.13
|
|
|
|
Airconditioning
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
CAI Fences
|
$902.00
|
|
|
|
Replace Rubber
Matting - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Calidad Industries
|
$17.29
|
|
|
|
Diffuser -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Cameleon Paints
|
$922.08
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies -
Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Cardno BSB Pty Ltd
|
$10,307.13
|
|
|
|
Professional
Services - Ocean Reef Road Stage 2 Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries
|
$7,614.87
|
|
|
|
Disposal
Of Mixed Materials & Green Waste - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA
|
$429.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Batteries - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Chemform
|
$983.36
|
|
|
|
Kitchen Supplies
- Kingsway
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering
|
$44,038.90
|
|
|
|
Catering
Services For Various Council Functions
|
|
|
|
|
Chiorino Australia Pty Ltd
|
$3,735.09
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
City Business Machines
|
$777.30
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
City of Joondalup
|
$547.80
|
|
|
|
Library Bags 600
Red - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd
|
$95,339.71
|
|
|
|
Trim
Licenses And Annual Maintenance Fee August 2011 - June 2012 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Library
Software Fees - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Clare Stace
|
$649.00
|
|
|
|
Performer
For Children’s Book Week 2011 - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Clean It Environmental Solutions
|
$4,801.50
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeping
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Clever Patch Creative Solutions
|
$45.66
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Coastal Services
|
$803.00
|
|
|
|
Oven
Repairs - Various Centres - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd
|
$15,766.50
|
|
|
|
Equipment Hire
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd
|
$624.92
|
|
|
|
Beverages For
Kingsway Sporting Complex
|
|
|
|
|
Collins Craft & School Supplies
|
$190.92
|
|
|
|
Various
Craft Items For Nauti Day Activities - Heritage And Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
Colmax Glass Pty Ltd
|
$6,705.93
|
|
|
|
Colmax
Glass August - Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Colourpoint Print & Design
|
$803.00
|
|
|
|
Printing - Laser
Cheques - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies
|
$1,254.75
|
|
|
|
Supply &
Install Winter Green Turf - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Express
|
$11,547.66
|
|
|
|
Stationery For
The City August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia
|
$150.98
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Coventry Fasteners
|
$193.35
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Spare Parts - Fleet/Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Coventrys
|
$1,865.32
|
|
|
|
Hardware/Tool/Spare
Parts Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd
|
$113.92
|
|
|
|
Various Parts -
Fleet Services
|
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited
|
$819.61
|
|
|
|
Software For IT
|
|
|
|
|
David Gray & Company Pty Ltd
|
$302.50
|
|
|
|
Promotional
Green Bins - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
DBS Fencing
|
$605.00
|
|
|
|
Manufacture
And Supply Fencing Materials - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd
|
$911.90
|
|
|
|
Dell Optiplex PC
- IT
|
|
|
|
|
Dept of Environment & Conservation
|
$4,586.79
|
|
|
|
Licence
- Compost Manufacturing And Soil Blending - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key
|
$2,246.06
|
|
|
|
Locking
Services For Stores/Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Dianne Sigel (Art Teacher)
|
$1,953.00
|
|
|
|
Adult
Pottery Classes - August 2011 - Heritage And Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Dieback Treatment Services
|
$495.00
|
|
|
|
Treat
Tuart Trees With Application Of Phosphite - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications
|
$123.20
|
|
|
|
Communications
Repairs - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print
|
$161.70
|
|
|
|
Cockman
House Sign - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Cant Watts Corke (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$1,925.00
|
|
|
|
Provision
Of Cost Estimation Services For The Proposed Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Club
Community Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete
|
$70,967.35
|
|
|
|
Supply/Lay
Concrete Footpath At Various Locations - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics
|
$510.25
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Dunbar Services (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$528.00
|
|
|
|
Clean
Kitchen Exhaust System - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
DVM Fencing
|
$1,309.00
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Stratco Fencing At Fendi Street - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Dymocks Joondalup
|
$474.84
|
|
|
|
Stock For
Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher
|
$4,181.65
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet & Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Boys Pizza Wanneroo
|
$93.50
|
|
|
|
Catering
- Meet And Greet New CESM - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$520.69
|
|
|
|
Disposal
Of General Construction - Engineering/Projects
|
|
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd
|
$152.90
|
|
|
|
Hire
Of Hydrolab Quanta - 30.08.2011 - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Eco-Care (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$471.90
|
|
|
|
General
Cleaning August 2011 - Merriwa Welfare Office
|
|
|
|
|
e-Fire & Safety
|
$77.00
|
|
|
|
Fire Blanket -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Elite Pool & Spa Covers
|
$6,011.50
|
|
|
|
Pool Blanket For
Outdoor Swimming Pool - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms
|
$7,540.50
|
|
|
|
Various Plants -
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd
|
$236.50
|
|
|
|
Reticulation
Items - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Email Media
|
$165.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga
|
$1,150.60
|
|
|
|
Uniforms -
Wanneroo Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Encore Automation
|
$297.00
|
|
|
|
Calibrate/Service
Portable Gas Detector - Engineering Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd
|
$7,413.53
|
|
|
|
Final
Landscape Construction Claim - Innovation Playspace Area - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Ergolink
|
$7,091.29
|
|
|
|
Nelson Grey
Chairs - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Chairs For
CEO/Mayors Office
|
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services
|
$167.20
|
|
|
|
Attend
And Check/Test EWIS Equipment - Clarkson Library
|
|
|
|
|
Estate Landscape Maintenance (E.L.M.)
|
$45,046.41
|
|
|
|
Part Maintenance
For August 2011 - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Unshelled
Site Services At Butler - August 2011 - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Contracted
Maintenance At Butler - August 2011 - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Every Second Counts
|
$385.00
|
|
|
|
Modifications
To The Building Evacuation Plan - Wanneroo Showgounds Club Room - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd
|
$1,430.00
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
Audit Of Rotary Park Playground - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Facet
|
$650.00
|
|
|
|
Facet
2011 Conference Yanchep - Rediscover Parks 13-16.09.11
|
|
|
|
|
Fast Finishing Services WA
|
$594.00
|
|
|
|
Council Minutes
- Governance
|
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd
|
$1,929.45
|
|
|
|
Library
Magazines - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fence Hire WA
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Fence
Hire - Nanovich Park - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary
Fence - Broadview Park Landsdale - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Counsellors Association WA
|
$2,800.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
For S Kokir, J Ecclestone, H Gordon, V Ledesma, G Poulter,
P Thompson, A Adam - 26-30.09.2011 - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services
|
$11,886.12
|
|
|
|
Location Of
Services At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA
|
$1,171.50
|
|
|
|
Hire
Of Five Fire Extinguishers - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Protective
Helmet Visors For Volunteers - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Protection Association Australia
|
$374.00
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
Forum For C Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Services
Seminar Attendee M Stevens
|
|
|
|
|
Foodlink Food Service
|
$1,893.40
|
|
|
|
Various Catering
Items - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd
|
$507.71
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Foxtel
|
$81.00
|
|
|
|
Foxtel Service -
Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Freds Hardware
|
$905.33
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Friction Control
|
$60.50
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Frogmat Environmental (Australia) Pty Ltd
|
$38,337.82
|
|
|
|
Progress
Claim # 4 - Old Trafford Park Madeley - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd
|
$12,856.18
|
|
|
|
Paper
Supplies/Copy Charges/Lease Fees For Reprographic Services
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd
|
$21,066.65
|
|
|
|
Tree
Services At Various Locations For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Geon
|
$5,739.80
|
|
|
|
Printing - Junk
Waste Flyers - Waste
|
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Regulatory Services - NCR Books
|
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Regulatory Services - School Parking Infringement Books
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd
|
$6,607.70
|
|
|
|
Drovers
- Response To Public Consultation - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services For Mirrabooka Drive - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Ghems Holding Pty Ltd
|
$13,122.45
|
|
|
|
Seed Collections
For Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Weed Control -
Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Gladstone MRM (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$9,166.67
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Maintenance - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota
|
$9,180.50
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Grass Roots Inc
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Hire
Of Conference Centre - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia
|
$1,653.52
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Zamia Palms Caporn Park Maintenance/Service 19.08.11 - Infrastructure
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees
Services Along Pinjar Road 19.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Replant
Grasstrees - Luisini Park - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service
|
$220.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Hiab -
Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises
|
$4,864.35
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Sawmills Pty Ltd
|
$62.37
|
|
|
|
Treated Pine For
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Hands-On Infection Control
|
$699.14
|
|
|
|
Staff
Immunisation Program For MRC Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd
|
$2,682.90
|
|
|
|
Drainage
Items For Various Project Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd
|
$386.76
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals
For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Olsen
|
$405.00
|
|
|
|
Wednesday
Heal Program 5 X Fitness Classes - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday
Program - 4 X Fitness Classes - Community Links
|
|
|
|
|
Hendercare
|
$65,649.28
|
|
|
|
Support Services
For HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Hinds Sand Supplies
|
$462.00
|
|
|
|
Parks
Maintenance - South - Marmion Ave Quinns Rocks Harley Rake Hire
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd
|
$250.90
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters
For Depot Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$1,028.46
|
|
|
|
Support Services
For HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare Options
|
$17,609.99
|
|
|
|
Support Services
For HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Honeywell Ltd
|
$1,478.13
|
|
|
|
Preventative
Maintenance 01.08.11 - 31.08.11 At The WLCC
|
|
|
|
|
Host Direct
|
$66.04
|
|
|
|
Kitchen
Equipment For In House Catering - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products
|
$3,825.36
|
|
|
|
Road Drainage
Items For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps
|
$64,548.00
|
|
|
|
Inspection
Of Kingsbridge Lakes And Screen - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Replace
Vandalised Aerator And Cable - Fleming Park
|
|
|
|
|
Replace
Vandalised Aerator - Butler Lakes Kingsbridge - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Pumps
Repairs - Carramar Golf Course Pump Station
|
|
|
|
|
IBolt Fencing
|
$3,404.50
|
|
|
|
Gate
Repairs - Kingsway Sporting Complex - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Install Boom
Gate At Edgar Girriths Park
|
|
|
|
|
Repair
To Gate And Mesh - Montrose Tennis Court - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Parks
Maintenance - South - Fence Repair Butler Community Centre
|
|
|
|
|
ID Consulting Pty Ltd
|
$3,025.00
|
|
|
|
Forecast.Id
Quarterly Subscription Fee - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Profile.Id
Quarterly Subscription Fee - IT
|
|
|
|
|
In Line Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd
|
$1,277.76
|
|
|
|
Temporary Mesh
Fencing Panel - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services
|
$9,881.96
|
|
|
|
Call Centre
Services - June/July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$21,681.78
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Intermedia Group Pty Ltd
|
$84.00
|
|
|
|
Subscription
Renewal To Government News - Information And Business Improvement
|
|
|
|
|
IPWEA
|
$550.00
|
|
|
|
Systems
Plus Subscription - 01.07.11 - 30.06.12 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation Innovations
|
$10,136.17
|
|
|
|
Design,
Supply & Install Irrigation - Luisini Park - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd
|
$1,377.45
|
|
|
|
Hardware
Purchases For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$159.24
|
|
|
|
Pencil
Derwent Grate N Shake Ink Mixer - Heritage & Museum Services
|
|
|
|
|
James Foley Illustrations
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Presenter
For Children’s Book Week 2011 - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
JCA Dealer Services
|
$987.80
|
|
|
|
Camera Supply -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
John Smart Removals
|
$187.00
|
|
|
|
Internal
Move And Delivery Of Archives From Civic Centre to Depot - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre
|
$5,518.86
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees -
Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Fees -
Fire Fighter Medicals
|
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Photo Design
|
$900.00
|
|
|
|
Marketing And
Events - Aquamotion 28.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing And
Events - Kingsway - 02.09.11
|
|
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services
|
$2,610.00
|
|
|
|
Basic
Worksite Traffic Management Course - S Shrestha - 15.08.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Handling
Dangerous Goods & Hazardous Substances Course For 11 Staff - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Keynote Conferences
|
$1,787.50
|
|
|
|
Manager
City Business Attendance For Waste & Recycle 2011 Conference - City
Business
|
|
|
|
|
Keysbrook Holdings Pty Ltd
|
$66.00
|
|
|
|
Drycleaing -
Emergency Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kleenit
|
$4,726.20
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Knight And Sons
|
$467.96
|
|
|
|
Sustenance
For Impounded Animals - Regulator Services
|
|
|
|
|
Kott Gunning Lawyers
|
$891.00
|
|
|
|
Professional
Fees - Preparation Of The Assignment Of Lease - Aquamotion Café
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle Promotions
|
$742.50
|
|
|
|
Community
Links - Cleaning Capricorn House - August
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$7,943.15
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Printer
& Paper Feeder - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Colour Digital
Multifunction Device - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Photocopier
Meter Reading For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables Pty Ltd
|
$923.94
|
|
|
|
Parts For
Wangara Recycling Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire
|
$392.15
|
|
|
|
Rental Of Indoor
Plants For August
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark
|
$3,769.04
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Law Society of Western Australia
|
$450.00
|
|
|
|
Membership
2011/2012 For Karen Browne - City Lawyer
|
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor
|
$9,247.40
|
|
|
|
Supply/Lay Turf
At Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence & Hanson
|
$79.59
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
LD Total
|
$174,126.44
|
|
|
|
Landscaping/Kerbing
Services At Various Locations In The City
|
|
|
|
|
Len French Fencing Contractor
|
$280.00
|
|
|
|
Fence Repairs -
Imari Rt Clarkson - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific
|
$1,035.33
|
|
|
|
Group
Fitness Class Licences For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Lightlab International
|
$990.00
|
|
|
|
Annual
Software Maintenance Renewal From 01.08.2011 - 01.08.2012 - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia
|
$660.00
|
|
|
|
City
Businesses - Health Services - LGMA Integrated Master Class
|
|
|
|
|
Locker Group P/L
|
$358.60
|
|
|
|
Expanded Mesh
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Love Grid Badminton Academy Incorporated
|
$530.00
|
|
|
|
Ashaway
Shuttlecocks & Rackets - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Lyons & Peirce
|
$3,281.30
|
|
|
|
Hire
Of Combinations Unit & Operator & Vacuum/Jet Sumps & Drains -
Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
M & K Bailey Accredited Newsagents
|
$36.80
|
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals
- Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
MacDonald Johnston Engineering Company
|
$19,718.39
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Major Motors
|
$2,198.53
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Marfleet Distributing Co. Pty Ltd
|
$3,241.70
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Martins Environmental Services
|
$6,132.50
|
|
|
|
Grass
Weed Control Koondoola Bushland - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving
|
$140,414.45
|
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
McIntosh & Son
|
$3,524.33
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors
|
$5,500.00
|
|
|
|
Legal
Fees - Claim For Compensation East Wanneroo Cells 5 And 6 - Planning
|
|
|
|
|
McLernon's Supply & Demand
|
$229.00
|
|
|
|
Pin Board For
Phil Renkin Recreation Centre
|
|
|
|
|
McNaughtans Pty Ltd
|
$139.66
|
|
|
|
Gas Struts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanical Project Services Pty Ltd
|
$6,145.79
|
|
|
|
Repairs
At Various Locations - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Merlo Australia
|
$1,962.32
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Meter Office
|
$176.00
|
|
|
|
Duracopy
Waterproof Paper - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd
|
$18,405.10
|
|
|
|
Heavy
Duty Red Paver - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Midland Disposal Stores
|
$478.50
|
|
|
|
Elastic Overboot
Covers - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council
|
$159,372.61
|
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd
|
$20,982.90
|
|
|
|
Fuel August 2011
- Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$3,492.50
|
|
|
|
Repair
& Replace Shade Sail At Aquamotion - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement
Shade Sail - Hainsworth Leisure Centre - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Morley Mower Centre
|
$783.70
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Motorlife
|
$609.84
|
|
|
|
Inox For Stores
|
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd
|
$3,101.56
|
|
|
|
Professional
Services For Beach Accessways Quinns Rocks And Yanchep
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Christopher Trent Nixon
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Performer
For Children’s Book Week 2011 - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Ronald Payne
|
$100.00
|
|
|
|
Preparation
And Presentation Costs For Family History Seminar For Wanneroo Museum
27.08.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Megan J McKinlay
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Book Week
Presentation 22.08.11
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Punita Bimal Mandalia
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Art
And Craft Classes Held 10.08.11,.08.11 and 07.09.11
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Samantha Anne Hughes
|
$600.00
|
|
|
|
Children's
Book Week 2011 Storyteller At Girrawheen Library
|
|
|
|
|
Mustang Print & Copy
|
$126.05
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Laminations - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Newforms Landscape
|
$6,094.00
|
|
|
|
Consultancy
Services For Jimbub Swamp Park Tapping - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Nilfisk Advance Pty Ltd
|
$375.01
|
|
|
|
Various Works
For Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control
|
$759.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists
|
$252.85
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass
|
$1,785.30
|
|
|
|
Windscreen
Replacement/Repairs - Insurance/Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
NSC Enterprise Solutions Pty Ltd
|
$10,025.75
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Nuford
|
$270.00
|
|
|
|
Check Engine
Light On WN32975 - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Oakvale Capital Limited
|
$2,200.00
|
|
|
|
Investment
Advisory & Reporting Fee August 2011 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd
|
$4,293.73
|
|
|
|
Glazing Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited
|
$775.71
|
|
|
|
Copy Charges -
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
OCP Sales - Omnific Enterprises P/L
|
$583.55
|
|
|
|
Replacement Of
Two Way Radio - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$46,445.99
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Services For The City - Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Officemax
|
$12.99
|
|
|
|
Digital Camera
SD Card - IT
|
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd
|
$129.60
|
|
|
|
USB - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
O'Learys Material Handling Service
|
$1,737.01
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Orica Australia P/L
|
$233.24
|
|
|
|
Annual
Supply Of Chlorine Gas For Wanneroo - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Otto Environment Systems Pty Ltd
|
$87,199.20
|
|
|
|
Grenns Lids With
Lids - Waste Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Our Community Pty Ltd
|
$7,780.00
|
|
|
|
Smarty
Grants Manager Subscription - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group
|
$9,149.80
|
|
|
|
Uniforms For
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Paper Recycling Industries
|
$272.80
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Recycle Bin Exchange - Information Management
|
|
|
|
|
Parins
|
$2,000.00
|
|
|
|
Insurance Excess
WN32160 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Park Motor Body Builders
|
$79.20
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Patch Theatre
|
$1,540.00
|
|
|
|
Theatre
Presentations - The Emperors Nightingale - Library Services
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conti Estate Bottled Wines
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
|
Wine
For Volunteers Function 02.09.11 - Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
People Rich Pty Ltd
|
$380.00
|
|
|
|
Manager
Land Development - Extended Disc Online
|
|
|
|
|
Online Profiles
For Two Candidates - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Personalised Landscape & Design
|
$4,680.50
|
|
|
|
Various Works
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Perth Industrial Centre Pty Ltd
|
$1,746.76
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters
|
$460.00
|
|
|
|
HACC
Transport For Yanchep Outing - Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Motors of Wanneroo
|
$422.35
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Service
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Pink Healthcare Services
|
$1,654.80
|
|
|
|
Hygienic
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting
|
$1,335.40
|
|
|
|
Parks
Maintenance North - Various
|
|
|
|
|
Plantrite
|
$8,519.17
|
|
|
|
Plants For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers
|
$63.00
|
|
|
|
Equipment For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Portner Press Pty Ltd
|
$57.00
|
|
|
|
Employment
Law Update Book For A Gillespie - Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Portobello Fresh Food Merchants
|
$601.68
|
|
|
|
Catering For
Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
PPG Industries Australia Pty Ltd
|
$111.13
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms
|
$2,006.95
|
|
|
|
Alarm Services
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Printstuf
|
$1,071.40
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Community Links Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Printing -
Aquamotion Basestock
|
|
|
|
|
Promicro Pty Ltd
|
$980.65
|
|
|
|
Air Sampling Of
Building - Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$11,713.63
|
|
|
|
Safety Items For
Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Put On Happy Face - Face Painting
|
$576.00
|
|
|
|
2
Facepainters For Wanneroo Library Event 18.09.11
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$3,021.70
|
|
|
|
Road Testing
Services For Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Multimedia Communications
|
$203.18
|
|
|
|
Communications
Web Messaging - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
R E Miles
|
$240.00
|
|
|
|
Pest Treatment
Services For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Rayco Equipment Pty Ltd
|
$136.89
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
RCG Pty Ltd
|
$1,519.78
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of
Rubble - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Recover-E Solicitors
|
$222.75
|
|
|
|
Debt
Recovery Services - Letters Of Demand - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Recycling Design & Technologies (Aust) Pty Ltd
|
$140,093.80
|
|
|
|
20%
On Commission Of Detailed Design Drawings - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
10%
On Award Of Contract For Supply/Installation Of Glass Separating And Grading
System Upgrade - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Red 11 Pty Ltd
|
$83,885.21
|
|
|
|
Avaya Phone
Upgrade For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Yearly
Back To Back Compulsory Support For IT
|
|
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd
|
$57.50
|
|
|
|
Refresh
15L Water & Deposit - Girrawheen & Yanchep Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Reinol WA
|
$177.54
|
|
|
|
Reinol K
Cartridge - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Retech Rubber Pty Ltd
|
$275.00
|
|
|
|
Repairs
To Hainsworth Park - Parks Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Richgro
|
$19.50
|
|
|
|
Lawn Mix - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services
|
$9,168.50
|
|
|
|
Road Linemarking
Services For Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia
|
$8,437.00
|
|
|
|
Various
Road Signs For Engineering/Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bollards -
Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Sign - Dogs
Prohibited On Beach - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$193,587.49
|
|
|
|
Road
Works At Various Project Locations For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd
|
$39.33
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Rubek Automatic Doors
|
$2,533.30
|
|
|
|
Service Doors -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Safety Barriers WA
|
$18,920.00
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Safety Barriers - Joondalup Drive - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Safety World
|
$2,693.76
|
|
|
|
Safety Items For
Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies
|
$1,020.54
|
|
|
|
First Aid
Supplies For Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Service Stream Communications Pty Ltd
|
$15,331.80
|
|
|
|
Adjust
Telstra Network - Caporn Street Tapping - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals
|
$745.03
|
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals
For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Sign A Rama
|
$1,144.00
|
|
|
|
Install
Price Signs Marangaroo/Carramar Golf Courses
|
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports
|
$6,966.30
|
|
|
|
Gym Balls -
Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement
For Wicket - Houghton Park, Alexander Heights South, Hudson Park - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Smith Broughton & Sons
|
$17,050.00
|
|
|
|
Forklift
Hancha 3 Tonne Diesel - Fleet Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Solver Paints
|
$940.38
|
|
|
|
Paint Supplies -
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
Sorensen Short & Associates
|
$6,702.74
|
|
|
|
Survey
For Lot 3 (185) Mary Street - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Survey
For Ocean Reef Road Widening - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Cross Cleaning Services
|
$1,578.50
|
|
|
|
High
Pressure Cleaning Of Toilets & Carpets At Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding
|
$21.67
|
|
|
|
Shredding
Services For Information Management
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd
|
$907.50
|
|
|
|
Nematode
Analysis Report - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Sports World of WA
|
$1,367.52
|
|
|
|
Supply
Of Aquatic Items For Resale & Freight - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd
|
$81.00
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Yanchep/Two Rocks Youth
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Community Link
|
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment
|
$236.01
|
|
|
|
Bertolini
Sting Controller Quick Silver & Freight - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Stampalia Contractors
|
$9,196.00
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Wet
Loader - Badgerup
|
|
|
|
|
Stantons International Audity & Consulting Pty Ltd
|
$3,998.50
|
|
|
|
Probity
Advisory Services In Support Of The City For The Month Of July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Star Three Media Pty Ltd
|
$935.00
|
|
|
|
Annual
Renewal Of Domain Name Wanneroo ‘Property.Com.Au’ - Business
Development
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd
|
$2,190.47
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Supplies For Depot Store
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services
|
$702.00
|
|
|
|
Inspection
Of Yanchep Sewerage Pumping Stations - Yanchep Beach
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
Sewerage Transfer Pump - Recreation Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Statewide Turf Services
|
$10,120.00
|
|
|
|
Verti
Drains Active Fields - Various Locations - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Sterihealth Services Pty Ltd
|
$285.52
|
|
|
|
Collect
Sharpsmart - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical Waste
Bin - Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
Stewarts Laundry Service
|
$427.74
|
|
|
|
Weekly
Bag Wash - Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning
Of Linen In The Civic Centre - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Streamline Trust
|
$40.80
|
|
|
|
Newspapers For
Yanchep Library
|
|
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo
|
$150.00
|
|
|
|
Catering
Order - Platters For Training Course - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City Publishing Pty Ltd
|
$1,300.00
|
|
|
|
Sun
City Link - August/September 2011 - Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades
|
$5,205.00
|
|
|
|
Shade
Sail Replacement - Tandara Park Tapping - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
& Install Shade Sail For Kingsway Indoor Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Swim Australia
|
$396.00
|
|
|
|
Re-Registration
Of Single Centre Swim School 2011/2012 - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd
|
$340.45
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
Tang Computers
|
$99.00
|
|
|
|
Clip On
Microphone - IT
|
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara
|
$616.00
|
|
|
|
Flat Free
Wheelbarrow Tyres - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Hire Of Lawn
Slasher & Brushcutter - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
The Language Centre
|
$298.45
|
|
|
|
Multi
Language Materials For English Conversation Classes - Libraries
|
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed
|
$140.36
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia WA Branch Inc
|
$11,609.00
|
|
|
|
Pool Inspections
- Building Services
|
|
|
|
|
Resuscitation
Re-qualification Refresher - HR
|
|
|
|
|
Senior First Aid
16.08.2011 - HR
|
|
|
|
|
The Watershed Water Systems
|
$6,831.32
|
|
|
|
Retic Fittings
For Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd
|
$637.69
|
|
|
|
Courier Services
- Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Tomcat Hardchrome Engineering
|
$2,640.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Toms Sheetmetal
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Total Road Services
|
$48,201.04
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Total Steel of Aust Pty Ltd
|
$3,096.66
|
|
|
|
Steel Supplies
For Fleet/WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Town of Port Hedland
|
$2,399.40
|
|
|
|
Part
Portion Of Long Service Leave Liability For Richard Bairstow - HR
|
|
|
|
|
TQuip
|
$21,307.40
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd
|
$4,223.47
|
|
|
|
Repair
To Swapped Spa & Deepwater Pool Probes - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Service To Pool Filtration System For Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs To Pump
- Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd
|
$23,872.42
|
|
|
|
Electrical Works
At Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Truckline
|
$743.56
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Tudor House
|
$1,332.00
|
|
|
|
Supply
Fire Services Flags For Wanneroo And Quinns Fire Stations - Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Turbotech Turbochargers
|
$3,552.83
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd
|
$153,681.49
|
|
|
|
Bushland Weed
Control Koondoola - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Golf
Course Maintenance For August - Carramar & Marangaroo Golf Course
|
|
|
|
|
Broadleaf Weed
Control - Various Locations
|
|
|
|
|
Bushland
Spraying - Various Parks
|
|
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd
|
$12.98
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
United Equipment
|
$1,275.83
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
VE Graphics
|
$93.50
|
|
|
|
5
Year Clear Self Adhesive Vinyl - Heritage And Museum
|
|
|
|
|
Velios Contracting
|
$463.10
|
|
|
|
Kerb
Numbers 9 Dara Crt Wanneroo - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Line
Marking Abbeville Circle Girrawheen - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd
|
$608.85
|
|
|
|
Repair Two Way
Radios For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Vetwest Wanneroo
|
$238.00
|
|
|
|
Veterinary
Services and Pharmaceutical's - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
VLI Conveyors Pty Ltd
|
$15,346.38
|
|
|
|
Supply Chevron
Conveyor - WRC
|
|
|
|
|
WA Aquatic Club Pty Ltd
|
$111.40
|
|
|
|
Bayswim Starter
Kits - Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
WA Country Health Service
|
$260.00
|
|
|
|
1 Pitstop Mens
Health Package - Programs
|
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors
|
$1,045.00
|
|
|
|
Roller
Door Repairs For Building Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
WA Gas Networks Pty Ltd
|
$44,337.74
|
|
|
|
Gas
Main Relocation In Ocean Reef - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Assoc
|
$9,015.00
|
|
|
|
Advertising
- Consultancy Services To Assist Cow With Emergency Management Risk Project
2100/12
|
|
|
|
|
Local
Government Convention 2011 Registration For Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
WA Rangers Association Inc
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
One
Day Registration 2011 WA Rangers Training Conference For T Fricke
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Caravan Centre & Steel Fabricators
|
$7,339.10
|
|
|
|
Steel
Fabrication Works - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric
|
$44,603.24
|
|
|
|
Electrical
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$28,838.04
|
|
|
|
Plumbing
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service
|
$2,145.00
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned
Vehicles - Rangers
|
|
|
|
|
Towing
Services - WN32940 Cat Forklift - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop
|
$531.00
|
|
|
|
Various
Netball Trophies & Medals - Kingsway Stadium
|
|
|
|
|
Silver
Magnetic Name Badge - Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Web of Life Productions
|
$148.00
|
|
|
|
12
Month Subscription For Quinns Rocks Adult Day Centre - Funded Services
|
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency
|
$6,909.34
|
|
|
|
Nurses
For Immunisation Clinics - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast Radiators
|
$695.00
|
|
|
|
New Engine
Radiator/Oil Cooler - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast School of Art
|
$200.00
|
|
|
|
Art Classes -
Program Services
|
|
|
|
|
Westbooks
|
$29.96
|
|
|
|
Book Purchases -
Wanneroo Library
|
|
|
|
|
Westrac
|
$287.08
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd
|
$129.80
|
|
|
|
Cash
Collection Services For Customer Services
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd
|
$13,508.00
|
|
|
|
Support Services
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Whites Wires Australia Pty Ltd
|
$28,160.00
|
|
|
|
Bailing Wire For
WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Wild West Hyundai
|
$277.65
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Services
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
WJ & A Gordon Low Loader Services
|
$2,640.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
Transport Services - Fleet/Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber
|
$708.35
|
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms -
Various Departments
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing
|
$896.00
|
|
|
|
Printing
- Business Cards For Various Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil
|
$18.15
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Oil
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Wurths Australia Pty Ltd
|
$65.28
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts For
Fleet/Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Xercise Pro
|
$3,846.43
|
|
|
|
Annual
Licence Fee - Installation Of Exercise Pro - Wanneroo Aquamotion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001379
|
28/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Australia
|
$640.31
|
|
|
|
Paging Account
For Fire Services
|
|
|
|
|
Builders Registration Board
|
$14,607.00
|
|
|
|
Collection
Agency Fee - August 2011 - Finance
|
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency
|
$247.90
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club
|
$2.00
|
|
|
|
Payroll
Deduction
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer
|
$468.51
|
|
|
|
Travel Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson
|
$134.61
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Allowance - Paid Weekly
|
|
|
|
|
Crosbie & Duncan Golf
|
$31,961.93
|
|
|
|
Carramar
Golf Green And Driving Range Fees - Property
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport
|
$333.63
|
|
|
|
Search
For Vehicle Ownership - July 2011 - Regulatory Services
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Jetty Licence - Ref 2130 - Commencing 01.08.11 - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers
|
$499.00
|
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries
For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Impact Communications
|
$795.00
|
|
|
|
Australasian
Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conference 2011 - Attendee
A Vanderwal - Assets
|
|
|
|
|
LGIS Insurance Broking
|
$409.19
|
|
|
|
Insurance -
Motor Vehicle
|
|
|
|
|
Main Roads WA
|
$4,074.39
|
|
|
|
Signage
And Pavement Marking Hughie Edwards Drive And Marmion Avenue - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Ryan Hall
|
$493.60
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
- Food/Drink For LGMA National Challenge
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty
|
$145.20
|
|
|
|
Keyholder
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
Ms Philippa Rogers
|
$129.60
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
Of Expenses For Glam Events Multimedia Workshop
|
|
|
|
|
Skillpath Seminars
|
$49.90
|
|
|
|
Book Purchase -
Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd
|
$276.38
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
$3,000.00
|
|
|
|
Bypass
Design Fee For Evandale Road Darch - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bypass
Design Fees Hepburn Avenue Marangaroo - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001380
|
28/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre
|
$110.00
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare
Parts - Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram
|
$424.59
|
|
|
|
Various Items
For Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
Blu Griffin Pty Ltd
|
$1,512.50
|
|
|
|
Marketing
- Bush To Beach Sponsorship Development 2011-2012
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
And Events - Bush To Beach Sponsorship
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
And Events - Beach To Bush Festival - Seeking Sponsorship
|
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge
|
$1,401.09
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge For
The City
|
|
|
|
|
Community Newspapers
|
$19,601.95
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo
Link & Bulk/Junk Refuse Advertising August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print
|
$605.00
|
|
|
|
Certification
For Entry Poles And Banner Kingsway - Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Resources Pty Ltd
|
$264.00
|
|
|
|
Disposal
Of General Construction - Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Home Chef
|
$337.94
|
|
|
|
Meals For
HACC/CACP Clients
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Group Ltd
|
$13,569.07
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour
For WRC
|
|
|
|
|
Jaypak Digital
|
$319.00
|
|
|
|
Pull Up Banner -
City Business
|
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Mita Aust P/L
|
$55.92
|
|
|
|
Photocopier
Meter Reading - Community Development
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark
|
$20.97
|
|
|
|
Interest Charges
On Statement - Parks
|
|
|
|
|
Logo Appointments
|
$947.93
|
|
|
|
Casual Labour -
Accounts Services
|
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts
|
$511.50
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning
Services For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe
|
$588.01
|
|
|
|
Various Items -
Stores
|
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories
|
$638.00
|
|
|
|
NDM
Testing Houghton Drive & Joondalup Drive - Infrastructure Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd
|
$47,842.25
|
|
|
|
Alexander Drive
- Civil Works - Projects
|
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing
|
$111.82
|
|
|
|
Plumbing
Maintenance For The City
|
|
|
|
|
Water Dynamics
|
$33,550.00
|
|
|
|
Installation
Of Irrigation At Butterworth Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00001381
|
28/09/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo -
Muni
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
Reconciliation September 2011 $50,880.91 Breakdown At End Of Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director
Corporate Services Advance - EFT's
|
$13,918,400.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES
FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD
|
|
1355-4019
|
25/08/2011
|
Wanneroo Plant Farm
|
-$742.50
|
|
1355-6864
|
25/08/2011
|
Dyson Packaging
|
-$748.00
|
|
1355-5646
|
25/08/2011
|
Find Wise
|
-$6,558.10
|
|
84445
|
30/08/2011
|
K Gray
|
-$500.00
|
|
83555
|
28/06/2011
|
Enric Tarraso Letang
|
-$47.94
|
|
82940
|
03/05/2011
|
WA No Interest Loans Network
|
-$10.00
|
|
84246
|
16/08/2011
|
ANZ Banking Group Ltd
|
-$50.00
|
|
84459
|
30/08/2011
|
L Curtis
|
-$200.00
|
|
81952
|
08/02/2011
|
Clayton R McKnight & Denyce L McKnight
|
-$604.90
|
|
83269
|
07/06/2011
|
Northern Metros Little League Baseball
|
-$200.00
|
|
84205
|
16/08/2011
|
Century Settlements
|
-$116.65
|
|
84180
|
16/08/2011
|
Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club
|
-$740.00
|
|
84469
|
30/08/2011
|
Rates Refund
|
-$1,293.12
|
|
84452
|
30/08/2011
|
S Tarawa
|
-$450.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
-$12,261.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING
SCHEME
|
|
|
|
Cell 5
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate - Requisition Notice
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Norton Rose Trust Compensation Payment For Lot 6
(359 Gnangara Road
|
$66,407.73
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal fees
|
$892.60
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal fees
|
$2,500.00
|
|
|
|
Finance Petty Cash - Parking Fees
|
$6.50
|
|
|
|
Cell 6
|
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal fees
|
$2,500.00
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal fees
|
$842.60
|
|
|
|
Cell 8
|
|
|
|
|
Norton Rose Trust Compensation Payment For Lot 6
(359 Gnangara Road
|
66407.73
|
|
|
|
Sorensen Short & Associates - Survey For Ocean Reef
Road Widening
|
$2,374.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$142,011.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account
|
|
|
|
Payroll Payments
September 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
06/09/2011
|
$1,286,349.55
|
|
|
|
07/09/2011
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
09/09/2011
|
$25,534.25
|
|
|
|
09/09/2011
|
$275.16
|
|
|
|
20/09/2011
|
$1,271,902.46
|
|
|
|
23/09/2011
|
$17,157.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total
|
$2,601,718.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees September
2011: EFT 1381
|
|
|
|
|
CBA
Merchant Fee
|
$22,184.37
|
|
|
|
CBA
Pos Fee
|
$251.97
|
|
|
|
GLF
Trans Fee
|
$300.00
|
|
|
|
Line
Fee
|
$208.30
|
|
|
|
Account
Service Fee
|
$853.42
|
|
|
|
Commbiz
Fee
|
$451.81
|
|
|
|
Bpay
Fee Rates
|
$9,063.75
|
|
|
|
Bpay
Fee Debtors
|
$346.00
|
|
|
|
Bpoint
Fee Rates
|
$1,383.56
|
|
|
|
Bpoint
Debtors
|
$49.91
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Direct Debit Return Fees
|
$15.00
|
|
|
|
Aquamotion
Direct Debit Return Fees
|
$17.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees
|
$35,125.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card Payments
September 2011: EFT 1381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
|
|
|
|
Items For
In-house Catering August 2011
|
$897.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Caple
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
- C Buck & M Greenhalgh
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Fuel
Purchase
|
$135.93
|
|
|
|
Conference
- C Ng
|
$120.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
- K Caple
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
- S Spinks & M Greenhalgh
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Bentley
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
Expenses
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Gift
Purchase
|
$255.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$44.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Blair
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
Expenses - P Williams
|
$1,700.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
Expenses LGMA Challenge
|
$495.89
|
|
|
|
Gift
Purchase
|
$75.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Kosova
|
|
|
|
|
Parking
Fees
|
$38.28
|
|
|
|
Airfares
Expenses - A Blake
|
$525.69
|
|
|
|
Accommodation
Expenses - A Blake
|
$195.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Paton
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
- K Browne
|
$594.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
- M Penson
|
$700.00
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$83.34
|
|
|
|
Conference
- Cr B Treby
|
$40.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
- N Gannon
|
$792.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
$244.90
|
|
|
|
Civic
Event Hospitality Expenses
|
$734.00
|
|
|
|
Conference
Airfares
|
$545.71
|
|
|
|
Parking
Fees
|
$25.90
|
|
|
|
Conference
Expenses
|
$10.00
|
|
|
|
Accommodation
Expenses
|
$954.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
Of Practising Certificate - Property Services
|
$1,020.00
|
|
|
|
Publication
Purchase - Governance
|
$221.00
|
|
|
|
Accommodation
Expenses - D Little
|
$360.00
|
|
|
|
Coles
Myer Gift Card For Italian Group At Alexander Heights
|
$1,014.85
|
|
|
|
Various
Items For Billabong Kitchen Upgrade
|
$496.14
|
|
|
|
Coles
Myer Gift Card For Wanneroo Adult Day Care Centre
|
$500.00
|
|
|
|
Coles
Myer Gift Card For Yanchep Community Centre
|
$514.85
|
|
|
|
Coles
Myer Gift Card For Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Centre
|
$1,014.85
|
|
|
|
License
Purchase - IT
|
$71.43
|
|
|
|
Requisition
Notice - Property Services
|
$80.00
|
|
|
|
Skype
Subscription - Library Services
|
$89.88
|
|
|
|
Publication
Purchase - Regulatory Services
|
$20.13
|
|
|
|
Stationary
Purchase - Program Services
|
$72.46
|
|
|
|
Accommodation
Expenses - T Tinworth
|
$532.30
|
|
|
|
Coles
Myer Gift Card For South Zone Youth Program
|
$164.85
|
|
|
|
Accommodation
Expenses - J Pullar
|
$106.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card
Payments September 2011
|
$15,755.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup Cheque
September 2011
|
$15,219,725.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total
(Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees)
|
$15,270,606.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid -
Municipal Fund
|
$17,872,324.92
|
Attachments: Nil
CS02-10/11 Financial
Activity Statement for the Period Ending 31 August 2011
File Ref: 5509
– 11/106527
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period
ended 31 August 2011.
Background
Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government
(Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to
prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according
to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. Administration
has opted to present the statement of financial activity by nature and type and
in a similar format to that presented in the 2011/2012 Annual Budget.
This format separates Revenue and Expenses from Other Revenue and Expenses and
provides improved disclosure of the City’s underlying Operating Result.
The Financial Activity Statement is
in the form of an Income Statement, which compares year to date actual income
and expenses with the year to date budget, shows variances and the adopted and
revised budgets (if any). Revised budget figures are inclusive of endorsed
amendments from Council (including the Mid Year Budget Review). It is
accompanied by a Balance Sheet together with information relating to Capital
Projects, an Investment Portfolio Summary, Statement of Net Current Assets and
Rate Setting Statement.
In addition to the above, Regulation 34(5) of the Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local
government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with
Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity
for reporting material variances. For the 2011/2012 financial year
Council has adopted 10% for the reporting of variances, which is in line with
previous years.
Detail
The Financial Activity Statement and August year to date
financial performances of the City are detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3
and 4.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(5) of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the
commentaries on 10% variances to revised budgets in the Financial Activity
Statement for the period ended 31 August 2011 are provided below:
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Net Result $
million
Year to Date Actual 75.445
Year to Date Revised Budget 73.228
Year to Date Variance 2.216
(+3%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 38.696
Full Year Revised Budget 38.696
The following information is
provided on key aspects of the year to date financial results:
Revenues $
million
Year to Date Actual 93.493
Year to Date Revised Budget 95.479
Year to Date Variance -1.986
(-2%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 133.806
Full Year Revised Budget 133.806
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
Currently Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
reflect an unfavourable variance of -81% (-$1.523 million). As per
previous years the City received in June 2011 an early payment from the Grants
Commission of its first quarterly instalment for 2011/2012, for $1.306
million. To August month end the largest receipt has been from the
Department of Child Protection for $0.079 million towards the City’s
Financial Counselling services.
Fees and Charges
Fees and Charges income as at the end of August are behind
year to date budget by -21% (-$0.790 million) primarily due to timing of
billing cycle.
Interest Earnings
For the financial year to date ending August,
Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index
benchmark by 0.71% pa (5.80% pa vs. 5.09 % pa). August year to date
interest earnings amounts to $1.478 million reflecting a favourable variance of
$0.256 million (21%) compared to year-to-date budget.
The City intends to continue with a “cautiously
optimistic” investment strategy throughout the year and has budgeted for
$7.123 million to be achieved by year end considering the current economic
climate.
Other Revenue
The Other Revenue category shows a favourable year to date
variance to budget of $0.202 million (+30%). The main contributor
towards this variance is the payment of $0.142 million received by the
City for the sale of sand at Lot 15 Motivation Drive Wangara. Additionally,
the Sale of Products income is currently ahead of year to date budget by $0.066
million which relates to the operations at the Materials Recycling Facility.
Expenses $
million
Year to Date Actual 17.119
Year to Date Revised Budget 22.602
Year to Date Variance
5.483 (+24%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 132.686
Full Year Revised Budget 132.686
Employee Costs
Under Employee costs a positive year to date variance of
+25% ($2.185 million) has been reflected for the end of August. The main
contributor towards this is the delay in recruitment for newly created
positions adopted through the recently approved annual budget together with
other vacancies. Hence, at present favourable variances +$1.340 million
and +$0.429 million are reflected for Salaries and Wages respectively.
Materials and Contracts
Under Materials and Contracts a positive variance to year to
date budget of +37% is represented (+$2.521 million). This is a result of
slower than expected recording of costs to some accounts within this category
for the first two months of the financial year. Material contributors
towards this variance are Contract Expenses (+$1.356 million), Refuse Removal
Expenses (+$0.427 million) and Material Expenses (+0.313 million). As
activities increase over the coming months this variance is expected to
reduce.
Utility Charges
The variance to year to date budget for Utility Charges is
currently +31% (+$0.287 million). Most accounts are within budget
expectations except for Electricity which shows a positive variance of +$0.354
million, negated by Water with a negative variance of -$0.080 million, both due
to timing of payments.
Insurance
A positive variance to year to date budget of +37% is noted
as at August month end for Insurance costs. The reason for this variance
is from the timing of the payments of the annual premiums, which are staged
over the year and should not result in any savings by year end.
Other Revenue and Expenses $
million
(Excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Revenue in excess of expenses:
Year to Date Actual -0.929
Year to Date Revised Budget 0.352
Year to Date Variance -1.281
(-364%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 7.577
Full Year Revised Budget 7.577
Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions
A negative year to date budget variance of -33% is
reflected under the Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions category
however no reductions in the annual estimates are identified. Material
amounts received year to date comprise of $0.500 million from Roads to
Recovery, $0.125 million from FAHCSIA Accessible Communities Grants and
$0.364 million from Main Roads WA.
Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Revenue
TPS Revenue as at August month end reflects a -39% variance
(-$0.898 million) to year to date budget. These incomes relate to
contributions from land owners towards future works to be undertaken within a
Scheme arrangement. The annual budget figure identified is an estimate of
what is likely, however may vary substantially depending on progress within
certain Scheme areas. Monies received will not have an effect on the
City’s operations as they are separately accounted for.
Contributions of Physical Assets $
million
Year to Date Actual 0.000
Year to Date Budget 0.000
Year to Date Variance 0.000
(0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 30.000
Full Year Revised Budget 30.000
Each year Developers hand over physical assets (such as parklands)
to the City, for its ongoing management and control. These assets can be
of considerable value and will be calculated and booked to the accounts during
the preparation of end of year Financial Statements. It should be noted
that variations on the amounts of contributions of physical assets comparing to
budget has no direct impact to the City’s current financial year
financial results. No values are budgeted to or have been booked to
account for August.
Balance Sheet (Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program as of 31
August 2011 is summarised below, by Program Category: -
Capital Works Detail By Program
|
Program
Category
Description
|
Annual Adopted
Budget
$ million
|
Year to date
Actual
$ million
|
Commitments
$ million
|
|
Community
|
3.581
|
0.388
|
0.228
|
|
Corporate
|
6.252
|
0.085
|
0.929
|
|
Drainage
|
0.730
|
0.012
|
0.109
|
|
Investment
|
4.200
|
0.599
|
0.000
|
|
Recreation and Sport
|
16.187
|
0.249
|
1.786
|
|
Transport
|
35.876
|
2.318
|
8.338
|
|
Waste Management
|
4.185
|
0.000
|
0.582
|
|
Total
|
71.011
|
3.651
|
11.972
|
The table above notes a total Annual Adopted Budget for
the Capital Works Program as $71.011 million. As at the end of August
$3.651 million has been spent against capital works which is as expected for
the second month of the financial year. In addition to the actual
expenditure, $11.972 million is recognised as committed. (Note: Commitments
are life to date and will also relate to future financial periods).
Due to various issues outside of the City’s control, some
projects were required to be carried forward from 2010/2011 to 2011/2012.
Once the final year-end figures are available the carry forwards identified are
likely to be adjusted where necessary and then reflected in the Annual Revised
Budget.
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information
above, key projects are selected to be reported on, on a regular basis, which
are listed in the following table:
Capital Works
Details For Selected Projects
Project
Description
|
Annual Adopted
Budget
$ million
|
Year to Date
Actual
$ million
|
Commitments $
million
|
|
Ocean Reef Road Wangara
|
11.000
|
1.196
|
6.138
|
|
Flynn Drive Neerabup
|
6.216
|
0.000
|
0.022
|
|
Hepburn Avenue
Alexander Heights
|
3.801
|
0.100
|
0.035
|
|
Upgrade Kingsway RSC
Hepburn Entrance
|
3.730
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
Pinjar Road Ashby
|
3.719
|
0.377
|
0.678
|
|
Develop Industrial
Estate Neerabup
|
2.818
|
0.599
|
0.000
|
|
Joondalup Drive
Carramar
|
2.645
|
0.443
|
0.477
|
|
Replace Waste
Management Plant
|
2.142
|
0.000
|
0.103
|
|
Replace Light Plant
|
2.083
|
0.000
|
0.363
|
|
Lenore Road Wanneroo
|
1.450
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
Yanchep District
Playing Fields
|
1.205
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
Yanchep Lagoon
|
1.050
|
0.000
|
0.032
|
Investment Portfolio Summary (Refer to
Attachment 3)
In accordance with the review of the City’s Investment
Policy at the Council meeting held on 14 December 2010 (CS03-12/10),
Council endorsed the City to continue maintaining a “cautiously
optimistic” approach to its investments to ensure full protection of the
City’s financial assets. As such, the City will only invest in government
guaranteed products or short to medium term deposits with major banks during
the present economic climate.
As at 31 August 2011, the City holds an investment portfolio
(cash and cash equivalents) of $194.521 million. Interest Earnings were
budgeted at 5% yield. For the financial year to date ending August,
Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index
benchmark by 0.71% pa (5.80% pa vs. 5.09% pa). Further explanation of the
current economic climate, market conditions and City’s portfolio analysis
is detailed in Attachment 3.
Rate Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4
represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the
movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and
capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
Overall Comment
The Operating Result for the City to August month end
presents an overall positive variance of +5% (+$3.497 million) to year to date
budget. Operating income presented a minimal variance to year to date adopted
budget of -2%, with the main contributor being a below budget result from
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions. This does not however
present any concern when assessing the annual budget as it relates to the
timing of income being received. Rates were raised in August which
represented the majority of the City’s income sources. Expenditures
from operations continue to present a favourable variance to year to date
budget of +24% (+$5.483 million) with the major influence being the
positive variance generated from Employee Costs. Whilst activities in the
capital program have been very slow to start the financial year they have
increased into August.
Upon the completion of the
external audit in the coming months, the final figures for the 2010/2011 year
end will be subsequently reported to Council and appropriate adjustments, if
any, will be reflected in the brought forward Surplus/(Deficit) of the Rate
Setting Statement.
Statutory
Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4
of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of
the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and
4.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the Financial
Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to Budget for the period
ended 31 August 2011, consisting of:
a) Annual
Original and Revised Budgets,
b) August
2011 Year to Date Budget Estimates,
c) August
2011 Year to Date Income and Expenditures,
d) August
2011 Year to Date Material Variance Notes, and
e) August
2011 Year to Date Net Current Assets.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Income Statement
|
11/106887
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Balance Sheet
|
11/106895
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Economic and Investment Portfolio
|
11/106889
|
Minuted
|
|
4.
|
Rate Setting Statement
|
11/106891
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 285
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 286
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 287
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 289
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 290
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 291
Governance and
Executive Services
CS03-10/11 Donations
to be Considered by Council - October 2011
File Ref: 5509
– 11/106176
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver
of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver
of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and
Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy requires applications over $500 from
individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a
report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where
applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the City’s
Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00
per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the
amount provided is $500.00 per individual with no capped amount.
Detail
During this period, the City has received two sponsorship
requests, two community donation requests and nil requests for a waiver of fees
and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications
are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship
Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Ceide/Upton School of Irish
Dance
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Caiomhe McAleer, Monique Schokman and Lachlan Moroney
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
Irish Dancing National Championships of Australia,
Gold Coast Qld 27 September – 2 October 2011
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
$200 each (National)
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for national
events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per
team).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$600.00 to Ceide/Upton School of Irish Dance for the participation of Caiomhe
McAleer, Monique Schokman and Lachlan Moroney in the Irish Dancing National
Championships of Australia to be held at the Gold Coast Qld from
27 September – 2 October 2011
|
|
Reason
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
|
|
|
Applicant 2 – Kingsway United Christian
Soccer Club
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Michael Croot, Riel Makuei, Liam Harrop and Shaun
Woodall
|
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo
18years of age or under
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Event Details
|
U16 Boys National Christian Football Competition,
Newcastle NSW, 24 – 28 September 2011
|
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the
event
|
Yes
|
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Eligibility Level
|
$200 each (National)
|
|
Comments
|
In accordance with Council’s Policy for national
events the amount provided is $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per
team).
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of
$600.00 to Kingsway United Christian Soccer Club for the participation
of Michael Croot, Riel Makuei, Liam Harrop and Shaun Woodall in the U16 Boys
National Christian Football Competition to be held in Newcastle NSW from
24 – 28 September 2011.
|
|
Reason
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
|
|
Community
Group Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Spring in the Grove Inc
|
|
Request amount
|
$346.05
|
|
Description of request
|
Donation towards the 4th Annual Spring in
the Grove event on 6 November 2011 for the hire of Peridot Park and hire of
rubbish bins.
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Nil
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Not-for-profit
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to all members of the public
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies,
values and strategic direction
|
Objective 2.2 – Improve the City’s
identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation.
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
$10,900
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
$1,500 plus $3,600 in kind contribution
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
2011 - $2,000 through the March 2011 Community Funding
round to run this event.
2010 - $171.30 for hire of rubbish bins for 3rd
Annual Spring in the Grove Event 7 November 2010
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Comments
|
This group has been supported for the same event in
previous years.
|
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a donation of $346.05 towards the 4th
Annual Spring in the Grove event on 6 November 2011 for the hire of Peridot
Park and hire of rubbish bins.
|
|
Reason
|
This request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
Applicant 2 – ARAFMI
|
|
Request amount
|
$500.00
|
|
Description of request
|
Donation towards a Youth Camp for 9-14 year old mental
health carers at Ern Halliday Recreation Camp, Hillarys from 10 – 12
October 2011.
|
|
Criteria
|
Evaluation
|
|
Potential for income generation
|
Nil
|
|
Status of applicant organisation
|
Not-for-profit
|
|
Exclusivity of the event or project
|
Open to 9-14 year old mental health carers.
|
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies,
values and strategic direction
|
Objective 2.2 – Improve the City’s
identity and community well-being through arts, culture, leisure and
recreation
|
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by
the organisation
|
Not stated
|
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the
applicant or organisation
|
$4,100.00
|
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the
organisation by the City
|
Nil
|
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo
|
Yes
|
|
Comments
|
The Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and
Charges Policy states “At least 75% of membership of groups
requesting support must be City of Wanneroo residents.” This
group does not meet that criteria.
|
|
Recommendation
|
NOT APPROVE a donation of $500.00 towards a Youth
Camp for 9-14 year old mental health carers at Ern Halliday Recreation Camp,
Hillarys from 10 – 12 October 2011.
|
|
Reason
|
This request does not satisfy the criteria of the
policy.
|
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
The City of Wanneroo Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of
Fees and Charges Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at
National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team and Regional or State capped
at $600 per club.
Financial
Implications
|
Budget 2011/2012
|
|
$80 000.00
|
|
Amount expended to date (as at 22 September 2011)
|
|
$22 900 00
|
|
Balance
|
|
$57 100 00
|
|
Total of requests for this round:
Donations (in this report):
Total this Round
|
$1
546.05
|
$1 546.05
|
|
CARRY FORWARD
|
|
$55 553.95
|
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVE
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Ceide/Upton School of Irish
Dance for the participation of Caiomhe McAleer, Monique Schokman and Lachlan
Moroney in the Irish Dancing National Championships of Australia to be held at
the Gold Coast Qld from
27 September – 2 October 2011;
2. APPROVE
a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Kingsway United
Christian Soccer Club for the participation of Michael Croot, Riel Makuei, Liam
Harrop and Shaun Woodall in the U16 Boys National Christian Football
Competition to be held in Newcastle NSW from
24 – 28 September 2011;
3. APPROVE
a donation of $346.05 towards the 4th Annual Spring in the Grove
event on 6 November 2011 for the hire of Peridot Park and hire of rubbish bins;
and
4. NOT
APPROVE a donation of $500.00 towards a Youth Camp for 9-14 year old mental
health carers at Ern Halliday Recreation Camp, Hillarys from 10 – 12
October 2011.
Attachments: Nil
CS04-10/11 Review
of Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy
File Ref: 2855
– 11/107634
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To repeal and replace the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver
of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy) as shown in Attachments 1, 2 and
3 to this report.
Background
Following the division of the function of the Grants Officer
between Community Development Directorate and Corporate Strategy and
Performance Directorate in 2009, the current Policy was reviewed and two new
policies adopted being ‘Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and
Charges Policy’ and ‘Community Funding Policy’.
As a result the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges policy (Attachment
3) has not provided a clear decision making framework.
Detail
The total amount spent on Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver
of Fees and Charges for the 2009/10 financial year was $60,425.00. The
total amount spent for the 2010/2011 financial year was almost
$95,000.00. This increase can be partly explained by the unprecedented
number of natural disasters and consequent donations to emergency relief funds
but it also recognises that the City’s population is steadily growing,
resulting in more requests for financial support from members of the community,
which places an increased burden on the City’s donations budget.
Comment
The Policy is currently open to varying interpretations,
allowing a broad range of requests for funding to be supported. The aim
of replacing the policy (Attachments 1 and 2) is to strengthen the
criteria upon which a request for a donation is made, giving Administration
clear guidelines on how to assess the various applications received. The
main changes to the policy are summarised below:-
|
Previous Policy
|
New Policy
|
Reason
|
|
A report noting donations and waiver of fees and charges
approved under delegated authority will be prepared for each applicable
Council meeting.
|
This has been changed to say “…will be
prepared and circulated to Elected Members through the Members Clipboard
Publication.”
|
It is suggested that the report previously sent to Council
for noting of applications $500 and under that are determined by delegated
authority of the Chief Executive Officer be circulated via Clipboard on a
monthly basis. Records are also kept in the Delegated Authority
Register of these applications. The report seeking Council approval for
applications above $500 (or those judged to be outside of the CEO’s
delegation) will continue to be included in the Council meeting papers.
|
|
Definitions – Community Group Donations; Sporting
Donations; Education Donations; Fees and charges; City Facilities
|
Definitions are now at the end of document. Slight
change to Community Group Donations and Fees and Charges. Definition
for Delegated Authority and Donations added.
|
To update and clarify terms that are used throughout the
Policy.
|
|
Adhere to City requirements
|
3.1 All applications must be on an official form,
otherwise will not be accepted; and
5.2 Requests for funding will only be considered on
the official form and signed by a club official. Forms submitted and
signed by parents will not be considered.
|
The addition of 3.1 is to assist in the processing of
applications by stopping general letters and fund-raising type sponsorships
being sent to the City. These items create a time delay as letters need
to be sent asking for the correct form. The addition of 5.2 is for the
reason above, plus to ensure that all eligible children are given an equal
opportunity to obtain funding from the City.
|
|
Retrospective applications, including refunds.
|
1. Timeframe …and must be received at least two
weeks prior to the event.
|
This statement has been expanded to emphasise the need to
have applications in as early as possible.
|
|
Fundraising requests for specific projects and events
rather than generic fundraising campaigns will be considered.
|
2.9 Fund raising activities, for example, prizes for
quiz nights, fetes and generic fundraising campaigns from individuals and
national charities.
|
This statement has been expanded to clarify the types of
donations that are not suited to funding under this policy.
|
|
Sporting and education donations
|
5. Sponsorships
|
Education donations has been removed and the word
Sponsorships reinstated.
|
|
International $500.00 per individual
|
International $500.00 per individual (capped at $1,500 per
team)
|
Capped amounts are included at State and National levels.
It is reasonable to extend this capping to the international events in the
same ratio.
|
|
No category in this policy
|
5.4 Selection of individuals by schools are subject to the
following criteria: Funding will be to a maximum of $2,000 per school
per financial year to support students attending events.
|
School groups constitute a large proportion of teams
travelling interstate and overseas. By restricting the amount of
funding each school can apply for in a financial year, there will be more
funds available to support sponsorships for other participants throughout the
year.
|
|
No category in this policy
|
5.5 Disabled athletes, regardless of age
|
This has been added to the policy in line with
Council’s recent support of disabled athletes in the community.
|
“Section 3. Standard conditions relating to funding
agreements” has been added in an effort to make the recipients of the
funding more accountable to the City for the use of the City’s logo, hire
of facilities and expenditure of funds. A table has been added under the
heading “Categories and Criteria” to provide a visual aid outlining
the basic criteria the applicant must adhere to before submitting a request for
funding.
“Section 6. Specific Donations” has
been added to support groups that although they do not strictly adhere to the
criteria of the policy, have been supported in the past. The amount of
funding will be determined by the Chief Executive Officer. There could be
other groups not mentioned in this list that Elected Members may wish to
include.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
Repeal and replace the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of
Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial
Implications
The budget for this policy is set each financial year.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1.
REPEAL the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy
as show in Attachment 3; and
2. ADOPTS
the new Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy and new
Forms as shown in Attachments 1 and 2.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and
Charges (New)
|
11/90427
|
Minuted
|
|
2.
|
Donation Request Form and Sponsorship Request Form
|
11/84805
|
Minuted
|
|
3.
|
Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and
Charges - Existing Policy
|
11/84692
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 299
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 306
CITY OF
WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 308
CS05-10/11 Approval
of Council Meeting Dates for 2012
File Ref: 2374
– 11/105231
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the schedule of meeting dates for 2012.
Background
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, a
local government is to give local public notice of its ordinary meeting dates
for the next 12 months.
In February 2000, the City resolved to trial a combination
of a Committee and portfolio system of Council, with two full Council meetings
per month. This system was reviewed after extensive public consultation,
and in January 2001 a three weekly meeting cycle comprising a Briefing Session
(week one), full Council meeting (week two) and elected member/staff Policy
Forum (week three) was established.
In addition to the three weekly meeting cycle, Council
resolved on 1 July 2003 to adopt a Policy and Local Laws Committee to develop
and review Council’s strategic policies and local laws, and to rename the
Policy Forum as the Council Forum.
On 26 April 2006 Council resolved to disband the Policy and
Local Laws Committee due to a decrease in the number of items being presented
to this committee, and to incorporate those items that would normally have been
considered by this committee into the Council Forum agenda. At the same
time, Council resolved to formulate an Audit Committee as per section 7.1 of
the Local Government Act 1995.
At its meeting on 20 November 2007 Council gave further
consideration to its meeting cycle and resolved to adopt a four weekly cycle
consisting of a Briefing Session (week one), full Ordinary Council meeting
(week two), Council Forum and/or Audit Committee meeting (week three), with the
fourth week being used by elected members for committee work including budget
meetings, advisory committee/working group meetings and policy and procedural
reviews.
In 2008 it was determined to retain the four-weekly rolling
cycle of meetings, which is inclusive of briefing sessions prior to Ordinary
Council Meetings.
Detail
The four weekly cycle of meetings has evolved somewhat, in
that a second Council Forum is now held in the fourth week of the cycle.
Notwithstanding, the cycle is working well and it is suggested that this system
be maintained.
Week 1: Briefing
Session commencing at 6.00pm.
Week 2: Council
meeting commencing at 7.00pm.
A deputation session is held prior
to Council meetings.
Week 3: Council
Forum and/or Audit Committee meetings.
Week 4: Council
Forum.
Council is in recess from 14 December 2011 to 30 January
2012, and Council meetings are scheduled for Tuesday evenings starting 31
January to 11 December 2012.
A schedule of proposed meeting dates for 2012 is attached (Attachment
1) for Council’s consideration.
Statutory
Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
Part 5 – Administration
Division 2 – Council meetings, committees and their
meetings and electors’ meetings
S5.3 – Ordinary and special council meetings
“(1) A
council is to hold ordinary meetings and may hold special meetings.
(2) Ordinary
meetings are to be held not more than 3 months apart.
(3) If
a council fails to meet as required by subsection (2) the CEO is to notify the
Minister of that failure.”
Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996
R12 – Public notice of council or committee meetings
– s. 5.25(1)(g)
“(1) At
least once each year a local government is to give local public notice of the
dates on which and the time and place at which –
(a) the
ordinary council meetings; and
(b) the
committee meetings that are required under the Act to be open to members of the
public or that are proposed to be open to members of the public,
are to be held
in the next 12 months.”
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide
and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
Nil
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. MAINTAIN
its current four weekly meeting cycle as follows:
a) Week
One - Briefing Session;
b) Week
Two - Council Meeting;
c) Week
Three - Council Forum and/or Audit Committee meeting;
d) Week
Four - Council Forum, budget meetings, advisory committee/working group
meetings and other policy and procedural reviews; and
2. ADOPT
the meeting schedule noted in Attachment 1 for 2012 meeting rounds.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Proposed Council Meeting Dates for 2012
|
11/105227
|
Minuted
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 316
ORDINARY
COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
FEBRUARY
TO DECEMBER 2012
(FOUR
WEEK CYCLE)
|
Council
Briefing Session
|
Council
Meeting
|
Audit
Committee *
and/or
Council
Forum
|
Council
Forum
|
|
31
January
|
7
February
|
14
February
|
21
February
|
|
28
February
|
6
March
|
13
March *
|
20
March
|
|
27
March
|
3
April
|
10
April
|
17
April
|
|
24
April
|
1 May
|
8 May
*
|
15
May
|
|
22
May
|
29
May
|
5
June
|
12
June
|
|
19
June
|
26
June
|
3
July *
|
10
July
|
|
17
July
|
24
July
|
31
July
|
7
August
|
|
14
August
|
21
August
|
28
August *
|
4
September
|
|
11
September
|
18
September
|
25
September
|
2
October
|
|
9
October
|
16
October
|
23
October
|
30
October
|
|
6
November
|
13
November
|
20
November *
|
27 November
|
|
4
December
|
11
December
|
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 317
Property
CS06-10/11 Proposed
Lease to Optus Mobile Pty Ltd for a Low Impact Facility
File Ref: 6314
– 11/106113
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider a lease to Optus Mobile Pty Ltd (Optus) for a
“low-impact” Optus mobile telephone communications facility at the
Ashby Operations Centre.
Background
Daly International is a firm of property consultants who act
on behalf of Optus to negotiate leases and facilitate the installation of
telecommunications facilities. Daly International has been liaising with the
City, to install a “low-impact” mobile telephone communications
facility at the Ashby Operations Centre (‘the Operations Centre’).
Although Administration’s dealings have been with Daly International as
they are acting on Optus’ behalf they will hereafter be referred to as
Optus.
Optus has been looking to secure a site within the general
area of Wanneroo North and has reviewed the limited options available to
it. Optus is planning to install a “low-impact” facility on
the existing guyed mast on Building 3 (refer Attachment 1) at the
Operations Centre, with an equipment shelter in the yard at the back of the
building.
The Operations Centre sits on Crown Reserve 27366 over which
the City of Wanneroo has a Management Order dated 6 July 2011. The
Management Order gives the City the power to lease for the designated purpose
of “Telecommunications” as well as ‘Municipal Depot and
Community Office’.
The regulatory scheme for telecommunications consists of the
federal Telecommunications Act (Cth) 1997 (‘the Act’), the Telecommunications
Code of Practice 1997 (‘the Code’), the Telecommunications
(Low-Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 (‘the Low-Impact
Determination’) as well as the “Australian Communications Industry
Forum C564: 2004 Deployment of Mobile Phone Network Infrastructure Industry
Code” commonly referred to as the “ACIF Code”.
Based on the specifications provided by Optus, Administration
confirms that the proposed facility is a “low-impact” facility
under the Telecommunications Act and the Low-Impact Determination. Such
telecommunication facilities are exempt from local and state planning laws
pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act.
Detail
Administration has been liaising with Daly International and
has negotiated on the following essential terms, subject to Council approval:
|
Land
|
A portion of Crown Reserve 27366 as shown on Attachment 1
|
|
Lessee
|
Optus Mobile Pty Ltd
|
|
Use of Premises
|
For the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating
a telecommunications network and telecommunication service
|
|
Term:
|
10 years plus a further term of 10 years
|
|
Rent:
|
$16,000 per annum gross
|
|
Commencement Date:
|
Date of signing of the documents
|
|
Rent Commencement
Date:
|
The earlier of:
a) the
date the Lessee commences physical installation of the Lessee’s
equipment on the Premises; or
b) the
date the Lessee identifies in a notice to the Lessor of the Lessee’s
intention to commence physical installation of the Lessee’s equipment
on the Premises; or
c) the
first anniversary of the Date of Commencement.
|
|
Lessee Break Dates
|
The completion of the 5th, 10th, 15th
years
|
|
Rent Reviews
|
3% increase per annum with market rent review
|
|
Access
|
The Lessee requires 24 hours, 7 days a week access
|
Consultation
Optus are required under the ACIF Code to consult with
several stakeholders in relation to the installation of a telecommunications
facility and have provided the City with a consultation plan which includes
writing to the residences within 200 metres, Federal and State Members for
Parliament and publishing an advertisement in the newspaper.
Under s3.58(3) of the Local Government Act 1995 (‘the
LGA’) the City is required to advertise the disposition if it is not
being disposed of by public auction or tender.
Comment
Optus did initially request 20 years as the term for the
lease. Given the residential infill in the surrounding areas
Administration did not consider it prudent to agree to such a long term.
Optus require a minimum of 10 years tenure given the cost of the
infrastructure. That term seems less problematic but in case the City
wishes to change the use of the Reserve within the 10 year period, Administration
proposes to include a relocation clause in the lease. This means that if
Building 3 is destroyed or that area of the Operations Centre will be developed
then the City will provide Optus with an alternative site where the equipment
is at the same height. Furthermore, it will be a term of the lease that
if the City no longer holds a Management Order for the purpose of
telecommunications then the City can terminate the lease.
With the shorter term of 10 years, Optus have requested a
further term of 10 years but that further term will be at the discretion of
both the City and Optus. A market rent review will be conducted at the
beginning of the further term should both parties elect to enter into the
further term.
A market rent valuation was received which indicated that
the Market Rent for the facility is $16,000 and Optus have agreed to pay that
amount on that basis.
As the facility is located on the Operations Centre the
requirement to have 24 hour, 7 day access to the Premises is problematic.
Security has recently been increased for the Operations Centre and the Premises
would be within an area that now requires entry to be gained by a security
card. To allow Optus the level of access that they want, it is proposed
that the gate to the Premises will open onto Pissaro Cres and they can access
it from that street without traversing the Operations Centre. Access to
the antennae will only be available during business hours and Optus will have
to be escorted by City Staff.
Annual Rent Reviews are currently a fixed increase of 3%
which is considered acceptable as it is roughly in line with the CPI increases
we have seen for the past few years.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.58(3) of the Local Government Act 1995
states that a local government can dispose of property (include leasing) other
than by public tender or auction if, before agreeing to dispose of the
property:-
“(a) it
gives a local public notice of the proposed disposition –
(i)
describing the property concerned;
(ii)
giving details of the proposed disposition; and
(iii)
inviting submissions to be made to the local government before a date to be
specified in the notice, being a date not less than 2 weeks after the notice is
first given.”
Section 3.58(4) provides what details are required under
(a)(ii) above:
“(a) the
names of all other parties concerned;
(b) the
consideration to be received by the local government for the disposition; and
(c) the
market value of the disposition as ascertained by a valuation carried out not
more than 6 months before the proposed disposition.”
Given the proposed lease is not an exempt disposition for
the purposes of section 3.58, local public notice is required.
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“4 Governance
4.1 Improve
strategic partnerships”
Policy
Implications
The proposed lease negotiations with the Lessee will be
conducted in accordance with the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Financial
Implications
The Lease will generate an annual income stream to the City
of $16,000 with 3% annual increases together.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES
and supports in principle the Lease to Optus Mobile Pty Ltd, for a portion of Reserve 27366 for the purpose of constructing,
maintaining and operating a telecommunications network and telecommunication
service;
2. AUTHORISES
the Chief Executive Officer to publish a local public notice of its intention
to enter into the Lease in 1 above, in accordance with the requirements of
section 3.58(3) of the Local Government Act 1995; and
3. NOTES
that a further report will be presented to Council at the conclusion of the two
week public notice period in 2, above.
Attachments:
|
1.
|
Plan of Leased Premises
|
11/107147
|
|
CITY OF WANNEROO AGENDA OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 11 OCTOBER, 2011 321
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 322
Chief Executive Office
Office of the CEO Reports
CE01-10/11 Donation
Requests Considered Under Delegated Authority of the Chief Executive Officer
File Ref: 2855
– 11/107063
Responsible
Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To note applications for sponsorships, donations and waivers
of fees and charges considered and determined by the Chief Executive Officer
from 2 - 22 September 2011 in accordance with the provisions of the Donations,
Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Background
The Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges
Policy delegates the consideration of requests for sponsorships, donations and
waivers of fees and charges under a specified value to the Chief Executive
Officer.
Detail
During the period, the City received the following requests:
1. Eight
requests for sponsorship; and
2. Nil
request for donations and waivers of fees.
Comment
In accordance with the provisions and criteria nominated in
the Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy,
determinations were made as listed in the recommendation to this report.
Applications and assessments of each request against the
policy are available from Governance upon request. Among other criteria,
sponsorship is given to individuals who reside within the City of Wanneroo, are
18 years of age or under and have not already received sponsorship in the same
financial year.
Donations are given to groups who are located or have
primary business in the City of Wanneroo and 75% or more of their membership
resides within the City of Wanneroo.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
This report aligns with the provisions and delegations of
the Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy.
Financial
Implications
Approval of these requests has resulted in expenditure under
Delegated Authority in the Award Governance Donations Account (717633-1207-316)
of $2,500.00.
Voting
Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council NOTES the delegated determination of
requests received by the City from
2 – 22 September for donations, sponsorships and waiver of fees and
charges, which are as follows:-
Sponsorship Requests
|
No.
|
Organisation
|
Amount
|
Recommendation
|
Reason
|
|
1.
|
Joondalup Districts Cricket Club
|
$500.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $500.00 to
Joondalup Districts Cricket Club for Jaron Morgan to attend the International
Cricket Series – West Indies to be held in the West Indies from 20
November – 9 December 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
2.
|
Track Cycling Western Australia
|
$500.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $500.00 to
Track Cycling Western Australia for Selena Karel to attend the 2011 Pacific
Youth Track Tournament to be held in Hong Kong from 8 – 12
September 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
3.
|
Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club
|
$200.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to
Wanneroo Horse and Pony Club for Kelly Stevens to attend the Pony Club
Australia National Junior Showjumping to be held in Werribee Vic from 27
September – 1 October 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
4.
|
Inline Hockey WA (RSAWA)
|
$200.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to
Inline Hocky WA (RSAWA) for Luke Battle to attend the Inline Hockey Australia
Nationals to be held in Hobart, Tas from 23 September – 1
October 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
5.
|
Race Walking Club of WA (RWCWA)
|
$200.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to
Race Walking Club of WA (RWCWA) for Breanna Brown to attend the 2011
Australian Road Walking Championships to be held in Canberra ACT on 21 August
2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
6.
|
ATI Martial Arts
|
$200.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to
ATI Martial Arts for Jomil Millares to attend the Taekwondo Australia
National Championships and Australian Open to be held in Canberra ACT from 8
– 11 September 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
7.
|
School Sport Australia
|
$500.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $500.00 to
School Sport Australia for Connor Wilkinson to attend the School Sport
Australia International Tour to be held in South Africa from 18 – 29
January 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
8.
|
Goalball WA
|
$200.00
|
APPROVE Sponsorship request in the sum of $200.00 to
Goalball WA for Nikolas Maxwell to attend the 2011 Australian National
Goalball Championships to be held in Sydney NSW from 30 September – 3
October 2011.
|
The request satisfies the criteria of the policy.
|
|
TOTAL
|
$2,500.00
|
|
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 325
Item 9 Motions on
Notice
MN01-10/11 Mayor
Jon Kelly – Revoke a Decision of Council - Wanneroo City Soccer Club
Floodlighting
File Ref: 5297
– 11/110211
Author: Mayor
Jon Kelly
Action
Officer: Mayor
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider revoking a decision of Council relating to the
Wanneroo City Soccer Club made at the 23 August 2011 Council meeting, Item
No: CD03-08/11
Background
Council resolved at its Ordinary Meeting held on 23 August 2011
as follows:
Item CD03-08/11
“Moved Cr Grierson, Seconded Cr Newton
That Council NOT APPROVE a reduction in the debt
to the City of Wanneroo by Wanneroo City Soccer Club in recognition of the
value of floodlights installed at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in 1998.
Carried Unanimously”
Detail
Approval is sought to revoke this motion and to present an
amended motion to approve a reduction in the debt to the City of Wanneroo by
the Wanneroo Soccer Club on the grounds of inequity. The City of Wanneroo
has treated other clubs differently in similar circumstances.
Comment
Nil
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy Implications
The lease on the Wanneroo Soccer Club is governed by the
City’s Tenancy Policy and the playing facilities uses by the City’s
Facility Hire and Use Policy.
Financial
Implications
The request for compensation
from the club has a total value of $18,000 – the amount funded by the
club when works were undertaken in 1998.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES
that Councillors, _________, __________, __________, __________ and
_____________ support a motion to revoke a decision of Council;
2. REVOKES
BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following decision of Council made at the Ordinary
Council meeting on 23 August 2011 as item CD03-08/11 detailed
below:-
“Moved Cr Grierson, Seconded Cr Newton
That Council NOT APPROVE a reduction in
the debt to the City of Wanneroo by Wanneroo City Soccer Club in recognition of
the value of floodlights installed at Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in
1998.
Carried Unanimously”
3. APPROVE
a write-off of $18,000 of the debt owed by Wanneroo City Soccer Club to the
City of Wanneroo in recognition of the value of floodlights installed at
Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in 1998.
As outlined in the original report, the direct financial
cost of revoking this decision would be up to the value of $18,000 if a full
offset was applied.
A broader concern for administration is the setting of a
precedent where other clubs could retrospectively seek future waivers and fee
reductions for works already completed or indebtedness to the City. From a
financial perspective, the potential value of such requests is not easily
estimated or apparent.
It should be noted that whilst the club originally funded
the installation of the lights (the Club advises the cost was $18,000, which
was partially funded from sponsorship), the City has borne the ongoing bulb
replacement maintenance and electricity costs and that the club has been the
primary beneficiary of the installation.
Furthermore the lights in question are to be removed and
replaced in the near future (funded by the City) to practice level for large
ball sports as part of the broader reserve and sporting field upgrades
associated with Stage Five Works (Kingsway Master plan Development) - with an
approved budget of $3,730,000.
The City has also prioritised works at Wanneroo City Soccer
Clubrooms in the current financial year – new roof, ceilings, electrical
upgrades with an estimated cost of $250,000 (PR2066, PR 2244 refers).
As a consequence of these considerations, Administration
does not support a further offset or reduction in the amount owed by the club
to the City.
Attachments: Nil
MN02-10/11 Mayor
Jon Kelly – Quinns Rocks Sports Club Request for Funding
File Ref: 5293
– 11/110675
Author: Mayor
Jon Kelly
Action
Officer: Chief
Executive Officer
Disclosure
of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider a request for supplementary funding for the
Quinns Rocks Sportsman’s Club.
Background
In November 2007, the Quinns Rocks Sportsman’s Club
approached the City to assist in the development of a Strategic Business Plan
to assist them in planning for future facility requirements and management of
the club’s projected growth.
This has led to an ongoing collaborative working
relationship between the City and the club to progress the development of:
· A
third bowling green to cater for expected growth in the bowls section of the
club;
· Additional
car parking space to cater for existing members and expected growth;
· Extensions
to the clubhouse to cater for future growth in membership; and
· Connection
to the Water Corporation deep sewerage to ensure the club is compliant with
statutory requirements.
To date, there have been various Capital contributions from
the City towards this project. These have been in collaboration with direct
contributions from the club to an estimate value of $700,000. The club
currently finds itself in the position where a rise in construction costs
(including some special unpredicted building requirements) sees it with a
shortfall in funding of $90,000. This report seeks increased financial support
from the City by way of a partial contribution to this deficit to the value of
$50,000.
Detail
The request for further funding
results from the requirement for the club to increase the level of specification
in works associated with earthworks to the car park and associated drainage.
These are partially linked to changes to the Development Approval documentation
as requested by the City
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The Quinns Rocks Sportsman’s
Club has a membership of over 1,000 people (including affiliate members). The
club has in the past provided information supporting its capacity to be
financially viable and operate under a secure financial management model.
The proposed development has Development Approval from the
City and monies spent by both the City and the club contribute to a quality
facility that has the potential to meet the leisure needs of both club members
and the broader community at large.
The club is recognised as a good tenant who are currently
contributing a significant investment into a Council owned property.
It could be argued that the City is a direct beneficiary to
the capital investment being undertaken by the club. Furthermore the club is
demonstrating a collaborative and strategic approach to meeting its own
objectives as well as providing a much utilised and sustainable service to a
growing membership base in a developing population area.
Statutory
Compliance
Nil
Strategic
Implications
The proposal accords with
the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 –
2021:
“2 Social
2.2 Improve
the City’s identity and community well-being through arts, culture,
leisure and recreation”
Policy
Implications
Nil
Financial
Implications
This report seeks a further commitment to the cost of this
project to the value of $50,000. A partial funding source could be a predicted
saving of up to $30,000 on project PR2200 Quinns Rocks Sports Club –
Construction of Bitumen Car Park North of Existing Facility. This predicted saving
has been indicated as a consequence of a recent cost estimate reviewed of the
finalised carpark design for which a budget of $145,000 has been allocated by
Council as part of the 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget.
Voting
Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the
unbudgeted expenditure of $50,000 as a contribution towards the Quinns Rocks
Sports Club carpark redevelopment works and to fund this contribution from
savings to be identified later through the Mid Year Budget Review.
In addressing the proposed carpark linked to the
redevelopment of the Quinns Rocks Sports Club (the Club) it is advised that
Council at its meeting in June 2009 resolved (in part):
“3. AUTHORISES
the Director Community Development to advise petitioners that due to the
City’s current financial constraints temporary car parking facilities, on
a compacted limestone roadbase, may be installed on the site by the Quinns
Rocks Sports Club, subject to a development approval being obtained and at its
own cost, until such time as City funds are available in the future to
construct a formal bitumen carpark; and that the connection of the clubhouse to
infill sewerage will be listed for consideration as a priority in future budgets.”
Based on the above resolution a sum
of $145,000 was subsequently approved by Council as part of the 2011/2012
Capitals Works Budget and allocated to PR-2200 Quinns Rocks Sports Club –
Construction of Bitumen Car Park North of Existing Facility as its contribution
towards upgrading the limestone carpark to be provided by the Club to a fully
functional facility (ie: a carpark fully kerbed, sealed inclusive of lighting
and footpath access). It is noted that the deep sewer connection had
$128,000 in funding allocated by Council as part of the 2010/2011 Capital Works
Budget, with these works subsequently completed and now operational.
Further contribution by Council in
relation to the redevelopment of the Club facility includes:
· At
its meeting of July 2010 Council resolved (in part):
APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, in
accordance with s6.8 of the Local Government Act (1995), the provision of
support to the Quinns Rocks Sports Club (Inc) in the form of going Guarantor to
a loan in the order of $300,000 for the Club to undertake extensions to their
club facilities.
· At
its meeting of 16 November 2010 Council resolved (in part):
“1. Pursuant
to Section 6.8 (1)(b) of the Local Government Act APPROVES by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
the unbudgeted expenditure up to $14,500 for PR-2128 Quinns Rocks Sporting Club
Electricity Upgrade.”
· As
part of the 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget a sum of $47,000 was approved by
Council as a further contribution to the redevelopment works to cover Water
Corporation Headworks Charges to the value of $7,000 and additional electrical
upgrade works associated with Western Power connection requirements as a
consequence of the additional power demand arising from the new building to the
valure of $40,000 (PR-2083 refers).
Administration has subsequently
finalised a design for the carpark, with the Club involved in the design
development and have since signed off in formal agreement. It is advised that
the design has endeavoured to reduce overall costs wherever possible. The
major saving in costs was directly attributable to being able to design out the
need for retaining walls. However, this then required the Club to amend
its Development Approval (DA) that had previously been approved by the City as
one of the conditions of approval referred to the inclusion of retaining
walls. An amended DA that reflected the change in design was subsequently
approved by the City, with the request for additional funding from the Club
following on from this approval.
At Administration’s meeting
with the Club on 5 August 2011 in finalisation of the carpark design the
following outcomes arising were agreed:
· The
City would provide the Club with the specification for the sub base works for
the car park including material specifications and compaction levels.
· The
City would finalise the design and prepare costings based on these discussions,
which included design adjustments and recalculation of cut and fill.
· The
City would assist the club in the preparation of an application seeking
amendment to the existing DA due to the changes in the design from that
originally promoted in seeking the existing DA, in particular carpark
levels/retaining. It was noted that this would only require City approval and
would not need to be presented to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
· The
City would meet with the Club to discuss the progression of the works once the
design and costings had been finalised.
· The
City advised that the budget allowance of $145,000 as allocated in the
2010/2011 Capital Works Budget would only be expended on its component of
carpark related works as directed by Council through its resolution arising
from the June 2009 Council report whereby the City would undertake the sealing
of the new access road and car parks inclusive of kerbing, pathway connections
and lighting, on a compacted limestone basecourse inclusive of stormwater
drainage constructed to City standard specification and provided by the Club.
· The
construction cost estimate arising out of the design for the City’s
component of the works is currently estimated at $115,000 and results in a
surplus of funds amounting to $30,000, with this surplus potentially available
for contribution to the purchase of materials such as stormwater gullies,
soakwells and pipes along with some limestone basecourse.
Ongoing consultation has occurred
between Administration and the Club over all aspects of the clubrooms extension
project. This has included impact of proposed works in relation to
environmental approvals, technical design, costings, staging of works and the
Club’s business continuity during the project. These discussions
are continuing to ensure that the the carpark (and access road) meets both the
Club’s requirements and the City’s responsibility in meeting the
safety and amenity requirements of the wider community.
Administration supports a potential contribution of up to
$30,000, with the final sum available subject to completion of works associated
with the sealing of the new access road and car parks inclusive of kerbing,
pathway connections and lighting for which a budget of $145,000 has been
approved by Council in the 2011/2012 Capital Works Budget (PR-2200).
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 11 October, 2011 332
Item 10 Urgent
Business
Item
11 Confidential
CR01-10/11 Retrospective
Development Application for Shop, Warehouse and Ancillary Storage and Loading
areas at Lot 888 (39) Prindiville Drive, Wangara
File Ref: 5642
– 11/103109
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Planning and Sustainability
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(h) such
other matters as may be prescribed
CR02-10/11 Small
Business Centre North West Metro Funding 2011/12
File Ref: 5642
– 11/88944
Responsible
Officer: Director,
City Businesses
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a matter that if
disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person,
where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local
government
CR03-10/11 Tender
No. 01129 - Construction of an External Lift to the Kingsway Indoor Stadium 130
Kingsway, Madeley
File Ref: 5642
– 11/107884
Responsible
Officer: A/Director
Infrastructure
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(e)(ii) a matter that if
disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person,
where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local
government
CR04-10/11 Adoption
of Business Plan for the Disposal of Lot 12 Fowey Loop, Mindarie
File Ref: 5642
– 11/106198
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a
contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government
and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
CR05-10/11 Proposed
Sale of Portion of Lot 506 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo
File Ref: 5642
– 11/107183
Responsible
Officer: Director,
Corporate Strategy and Performance
This report is to be dealt
with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995
Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(h) such
other matters as may be prescribed
Item 12 Date of
Next Meeting
The next Ordinary Council Meeting has been scheduled for
7.00pm on Tuesday, 15 November 2011, to be held at Civic Centre, Dundebar Road,
Wanneroo.
Item 13 Closure
