BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR ELECTED MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Rd, Wanneroo
on 24 February, 2015 commencing at 6.00pm
BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR ELECTED MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Civic Centre,
Dundebar Rd, Wanneroo
on 24 February, 2015 commencing at 6.00pm
PROCEDURE FOR FULL COUNCIL BRIEFING
PRINCIPLES
A Council Briefing occurs a week prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting and provides an opportunity for Elected Members to ask questions and clarify issues relevant to the specific agenda items before council. The briefing is not a decision-making forum and the Council has no power to make decisions. The briefing session will not be used, except in an emergency, as a venue or forum through which to invoke the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and call a special meeting of Council.
In order to ensure full transparency the meetings will be open to the public to observe the process. Where matters are of a confidential nature, they will be deferred to the conclusion of the briefing and at that point, the briefing session closed to the public. The reports provided are the Officers’ professional opinions. While it is acknowledged that members may raise issues that have not been considered in the formulation of the report and recommendation, it is a basic principle that as part of the briefing sessions Elected Members cannot direct Officers to change their reports or recommendations.
PROCESS
The briefing session will commence at 6.00 pm and will be chaired by the Mayor or in his/her absence the Deputy Mayor. In the absence of both, Councillors will elect a chairperson from amongst those present. In general, Standing Orders will apply, EXCEPT THAT Members may speak more than once on any item, there is no moving or seconding items, Officers will address the members and the order of business will be as follows:-
Members of the public present may observe the process and there is an opportunity at the conclusion of the briefing for a public question time where members may ask questions (no statements) relating only to the business on the agenda. The agenda will take the form of:
Ø Attendance and Apologies
Ø Declarations of Interest
Ø Reports for discussion
Ø Tabled Items
Ø Public Question Time
Ø Closure
Where an interest is involved in relation to an item, the same procedure which applies to Ordinary Council meetings will apply. It is a breach of the City’s Code of Conduct for an interest to not be declared. The briefing will consider items on the agenda only and proceed to deal with each item as they appear. The process will be for the Mayor to call each item number in sequence and ask for questions. Where there are no questions regarding the item, the briefing will proceed to the next item.
AGENDA CONTENTS
While every endeavour is made to ensure that all items to be presented to Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting are included in the briefing papers, it should be noted that there will be occasions when, due to necessity, items will not be ready in time for the briefing session and will go straight to the Full Council agenda as a matter for decision. Further, there will be occasions when items are TABLED at the briefing rather than the full report being provided in advance. In these instances, staff will endeavour to include the item on the agenda as a late item, noting that a report will be tabled at the agenda briefing session.
AGENDA DISTRIBUTION
The Council Briefing agenda will be distributed to Elected Members on the FRIDAY prior to the Council Briefing session. Copies will be made available to the libraries and the Internet for interested members of the public. Spare briefing papers will be available at the briefing session for interested members of the public.
DEPUTATIONS
Deputations will generally not be heard prior to the Council Briefing session and are reserved for prior to the Ordinary Council meeting.
RECORD OF BRIEFING
The formal record of the Council Briefing session will be limited to notes regarding any agreed action to be taken by staff or Elected Members. No recommendations will be included and the notes will be retained for reference and are not distributed to Elected Members or the public.
LOCATION
The Council Briefing session will take place in the Council Chamber in the Civic Centre.
Briefing Papers for Tuesday 24 February, 2015
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
3.2 Final adoption of East Wanneroo Cell 9 - East Landsdale Local Structure Plan No. 57
3.3 Adoption of Proposed Amendment No.138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2
3.4 Adoption of Local Structure Plan No. 92 - Woodland Vista< Carramar
3.6 Proposed Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) in a Service Industrial Zone
3.7 Proposed Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) in Service Industrial zone
3.9 Proposed Energy Generation Facilities Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue Neerabup
3.11 Widening of Neaves Road, Pinjar - Land Excision
3.12 Mulch Program - Community Water Saving Initiative
3.13 Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Outcomes of WAPC Approval
3.15 Tender No 01445 – Provision of On-Site Hire Items
3.16 Rangeview Road, Landsdale - Proposed Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation results
3.17 Proposed Roundabout - Giralt Road/Aylesford Drive (south), Marangaroo
3.18 Butler Train Station Precinct Parking Strategy - Community Consultation
Community Programs and Services
3.20 Ridgewood Reserve Changerooms Extension Preliminary Cost Estimate
3.21 Renewal of Edmund Rice Partnership Agreement 2015
Corporate Strategy & Performance
3.22 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 January 2015
3.23 Financial Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 January 2015
3.24 Function and Operation of the Audit Committee - Terms of Reference
3.25 Nomination of Elected Members to Joint Development Assessment Panel
3.26 Compliance Audit Return 2014
3.28 Donations to be Considered by Council - March 2015
4.1 Cr Dianne Guise – Cancellation of Part of Reserve 33522 (Lot 9062 Neville Drive, Wanneroo)
Item 5_____ Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
Item 6_____ Public Question Time
Item 8_____ Date of Next Meeting
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region and I invite you to bow your head in prayer:
Lord, We ask for your blessing upon our City, our community and our Council. Guide us in our decision making to act fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty. May we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to a prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Declarations of Interest by Elected Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.
Town Planning Schemes & Structure Plans
3.1 Initiation of Advertising of Amendment No. 143 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Lots 43 and 44 Wanneroo Road, Neerabup
File Ref: 18946 – 14/389341
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider initiating Amendment No. 143 to the City of Wanneroo's District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) which proposes to temporarily include the additional land uses of Transport Depot, Storage Yard, Motor Vehicle Repairs and Office as Additional Uses under Schedule 2 – Section 1 of DPS 2 for Lots 43 and 44 Wanneroo Road, Neerabup.
|
Applicant |
Taylor Burrell Barrnett |
|
Owner |
Mrs Dianne & Mr John Christian Woolgrove |
|
Location |
Lot 43 (2060) & Lot 44 (2066) Wanneroo Road, Neerabup |
|
Site Area |
5.0094 & 5.2228 hectare (ha) |
|
MRS Zoning |
Rural, Parks & Recreation |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
General Rural, Parks & Recreation |
Background
Lot 43 (2060) Wanneroo Road, Neerabup and Lot 44 (2066) Wanneroo Road, Neerabup make up the area subject to the proposed Amendment No. 143 to DPS 2 (subject site).
The subject site is zoned predominantly Rural under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and predominantly General Rural under DPS 2. Under both the MRS and DPS 2 the eastern portions of Lots 43 and 44 are reserved as Parks and Recreation. Attachment 1 shows the subject site and the DPS 2 zoning.
The subject site is bounded by Wanneroo Road to the west with Rural zoned land to the north and south. To the east is land subject to Bush Forever, forming part of the MRS Parks and Recreation Reserve for Lake Neerabup.
The subject site was zoned as Rural under the City's Town Planning Scheme No. 1 (TPS 1). Under TPS 1, a Transport Depot was a discretionary ('D') use in the Rural zone, however, the subject site did not have a Planning Approval for such a use. On 25 August 1995, a notice of unauthorised use of a Rural zoned property as a Transport Depot was sent to Mr and Mrs Woolgrove (the landowners). The notice was as a result of a site inspection carried out by one of the City's Planning Officers. No actions were, however, taken in regards to the unauthorised Transport Depot use and as such, the unauthorised use of the subject site continued. City records indicate that the subject site obtained approval for a Market Garden on 6 September 2000 which is still currently in operation for the majority of the subject site.
The City's DPS 2, gazetted on 6 July 2001, zoned the subject site as predominantly General Rural. In June 2001 the landowners contacted the Mayor of the City of Wanneroo regarding the permissibility of parking trucks on the subject site. The Mayor's correspondence dated 17 July 2001 indicated that under the previous TPS 1, a Transport Depot was a 'D' use in the Rural zone, however, with the gazettal of DPS 2, a Transport Depot was a use not permitted ('X') in the General Rural zone. The Mayor's correspondence stated, among other things, that "the only option for you to proceed with the operation of a Transport Depot is to seek an amendment to the Town Planning Scheme which would allow the operation to be considered as a development proposal". No proposal for a Scheme amendment was submitted to the City for consideration.
On 26 July 2013, an inquiry was received by the City in respect to the permissibility of the operations being conducted on the subject site. An investigation was undertaken by the City and on 19 May 2014, a letter was sent by Administration to the landowners of the subject site which alleged the following unauthorised uses being undertaken on site:-
· Unauthorised Transport Depot: Lots 43 & 44;
· Unauthorised Commercial Vehicle Parking: Lots 43 & 44;
· Unauthorised Storage Yard: Lots 43 & 44;
· Unauthorised Outbuildings & Sea-Containers: Lots 43 & 44;
· Unauthorised Motor Vehicle Repairs: Lot 43;
· Unauthorised Home Business: Lots 43 & 44; and
· Unauthorised Advertising Signage: Lot 44.
A meeting between Administration and the applicant was held on 17 June 2014 to discuss the alleged unauthorised uses being conducted on the subject site. Subsequently, on 27 June 2014 the applicant lodged a Scheme Amendment request for Additional Uses. However, after further discussions between the landowners, applicant and Administration, the Scheme Amendment request was revised to propose temporary approval for the Additional Uses, which is discussed further in the body of this report.
Detail
Proposal
The initial Scheme Amendment proposal submitted to the City sought permanent approval for the Additional Uses on the subject site under Schedule 2 of DPS 2, however, the revised proposal seeks the approval for the Additional Uses on a temporary basis. The revised proposal seeks an initial 5 year approval with the ability to extend for a further 5 years upon application to the City.
The Additional Uses proposed as part of Amendment No. 143 to DPS 2 are Transport Depot, Storage Yard, Motor Vehicle Repairs and Office, that will form part of Schedule 2 – Section 1 of DPS 2 for the subject site. This will ensure that the unauthorised uses currently being conducted on the subject site are legitimised and Planning Approval is able to be obtained. The proposed uses are defined as per DPS 2 in the table below (Table 1).
|
Proposed Additional Use |
Definition Under DPS 2 – Schedule 1 |
|
Transport Depot |
Any land or building designed and used, or which is adapted for use for one or more of the following purposes: (a) for the parking or garaging of more than one commercial vehicle; (b) for the transfer of goods or passengers from one vehicle to another vehicle; and may include the maintenance, mechanical repair or refuelling of the vehicles referred to in (a) or (b) above but does not include any of the functions defined under Smash Repair Station. |
|
Storage Yard |
Any land or buildings used for the storage of good, equipment, plant or materials. |
|
Motor Vehicle Repair |
Any land or buildings used for or in connection with electrical and mechanical repair and overhauls to motor vehicles. The term includes repair to tyres but does not include recapping or retreading of tyres, panel beating, spray painting or chassis reshaping. |
|
Office |
Any premises used for the administration of clerical, technical, professional or other like business activities but does not include administration facilities which are required in association with a predominant use of site, and does not include consulting rooms or medical centres. |
Table 1: Proposed Additional Uses Definitions Under DPS 2.
Attachment 2 contains the amendment plan showing the existing zoning and proposed zoning. The proposed Additional Uses will only be carried out on the western portion of the subject properties, fronting Wanneroo Road. As such, the Additional Uses designation is limited to the western portion of the subject properties as shown in Attachment 2.
Consultation
All scheme amendments must (by law) be subject to public consultation. However, before doing so, the amendment will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to assess the environmental impacts of the proposal and to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is necessary.
Subject to no objections being received from the EPA, the amendment must be advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days. Advertising is to occur in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of the Town Planning Regulations 1967:
· Advertisement in a local newspaper for one week;
· Placement of a sign on affected sites, giving notice of the proposal;
· Display notice of the proposal in Council offices;
· Display on the City’s website; and
· Referral in writing to affected persons/agencies.
The Town Planning Regulations provide that were an amendment is consistent with the MRS and State Planning Policies and Strategies, then the consent of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) will not be required to advertise the amendment. However, if an advertising period of less than 42 days is proposed, the WAPC's consent to advertise is required. Given that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the MRS, the consent of the WAPC to advertise will be required.
Comment
Administration makes the following comments on the proposal.
Objectives of the General Rural Zone
The subject site is predominantly zoned as General Rural under DPS 2. The objectives of the General Rural Zone as per DPS 2 are:
“a) Accommodate agricultural, horticultural and equestrian activities;
b) Maintain and enhance the rural character and amenity of the areas designated for rural use and to protect their ground water and environmental values.”
It is considered by Administration that the proposed amendment does not meet the objectives of the General Rural zone, for the following reasons:
· The proposed Additional Uses are not agricultural, horticultural or equestrian in nature. The proposed Additional Uses are industrial in nature and are acceptable uses in the General Industrial and Services Industrial zones under DPS 2 (discussed later in this report).
· The proposed Additional Uses will not contribute to maintaining or enhancing the rural character and amenity of the area, as the proposed uses are not in conjunction with any rural use. The Additional Uses are not being used in conjunction with the approved Market Garden on the subject site.
Notwithstanding the above, the proposal is only for the western portion of the subject site and is seeking temporary approval for the Additional Uses. The remainder of the subject site will continue to operate as a Market Garden. As such, the subject site meets objective (a) of the General Rural zone, as the predominant use is for an agricultural purpose and rural pursuits.
Appropriateness of Application
The proposal is not considered appropriate on a permanent basis for the following reasons:
· The proposed Additional Uses are considered to be more appropriate in other zones.
A Transport Depot is a permitted use in both the General and Service Industrial zones whilst Storage Yard and Motor Vehicle Repairs uses are permitted use classes in the General Industrial zone and are a discretionary use in the Service Industrial zone. As such, Administration considers that these use classes are unsuitable in the General Rural zone.
· The subject site is located approximately three (3) kilometres west of the Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA) which incorporates General Industrial and Service Industrial zoned land. The City's Advocacy Statement, Building a Future Together – Roads: Rail: Reserves: Region identifies the 1,000 hectare NIA as a key area which will be activated by increased transport infrastructure. As such, the NIA will facilitate services such as Transport Depot, Storage Yard and Motor Vehicle Repairs. Given the industrial nature of the proposed additional uses, Administration deems the uses to be more appropriate within the General Industrial and/or the Service Industrial zone as opposed to the General Rural zone.
· By supporting Amendment No. 143 to DPS 2 there is a potential to establish an undesirable precedent for other landowners to submit proposals to Council to allow non-rural uses on Rural zoned land. Such a proposal occurring in an area that is zoned to accommodate rural pursuits may lead to land use conflict between rural uses and non-rural uses.
Given that the proposed Additional Uses are proposed to be temporary in nature, once the operations have ceased, relocation to the NIA or a Service or General Industrial zone can be undertaken by the landowners. A temporary approval will allow for the site to operate legitimately until such time.
Supporting the Additional Uses for a temporary period ensures that they will not remain permanently within the General Rural zone. Furthermore, this will reduce the potential for land use conflicts between rural and non-rural uses in the future. The temporary approval will enable Administration to reassess the Additional Uses and their appropriateness in the locality at a later stage.
It is the position of Administration that temporarily supporting the Additional Uses will not set a precedent for future proposals seeking Additional Uses. This is because each additional use request is assessed individually and on its own merits.
Other Documents and Policies
In assessing the proposed amendment to DPS 2, consideration has been given to other documents and policies applicable to the subject site which is discussed below.
The 'Future of East Wanneroo' Report
The site is located within an area subject to the 'Future of East Wanneroo Land Use and Water Management in the Context of Network City' report and was identified as 'Possible Special Use (Tourism)'. Further studies regarding possible tourism areas were undertaken leading to the proposed Landscape Enhancement Zone for Carabooda/Nowergup, however, the subject site did not form part of this area. It is therefore not considered relevant to the determination of Amendment No. 143.
East Wanneroo Structure Plan
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) East Wanneroo Structure Plan (final report January 2011) is the culmination of various land use investigations (including the Future of East Wanneroo discussed above).
The East Wanneroo Structure Plan sets out a guide for further detailed planning for the East Wanneroo locality, however, the subject site did not form part of this area. It is therefore not considered relevant to the determination of Amendment No. 143
Statement of Planning Policy No. 11 (State Planning Policy 2.5) – Agricultural and Rural Land Use Planning
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) Statement of Planning Policy No. 11 (State Planning Policy 2.5) – Agricultural and Rural Land Use Planning (SPP 2.5) applies to all Rural zoned land within Western Australia, and outlines objectives to guide planning and development within rural areas. The City is required to have due regard to this policy in the preparation or amendment of town planning schemes, strategies and policies, and when providing comment and advice on planning applications that deal with rural land uses.
One of the objectives of Clause 4.1 of SPP 2.5 promotes the protection of agricultural land resources wherever possible by "discouraging land uses unrelated to agricultural from locating on rural land". In this regard, Administration considers that the proposed additional land uses of Transport Depot, Storage Yard, Motor Vehicles Repairs and Office are unrelated to agricultural activities and therefore contrary to an objective of SPP 2.5. However, given that the proposal is for the Additional Uses to be within the General Rural zone on a temporary basis, it is considered the objective of SPP 2.5 is not compromised as the Additional Uses will relocate or cease to exist once the temporary approval has lapsed.
Local Planning Policy: Interim Local Rural Strategy
The City's Local Planning Policy: Interim Local Rural Strategy (ILRS) provides a vision for rural areas and establishes the measures necessary for the achievement of that vision. Part 3 of the ILRS encourages the continuation and protection of rural and agricultural uses on Rural zoned land.
The proposed Additional Uses are incompatible with the land uses permitted in the rural area, and therefore, are not encouraged under the ILRS.
Notwithstanding the above, it is considered by Administration that due to the temporary nature of the proposal, it will not compromise the ILRS.
Applicant's Justification
Surrounding Additional Uses
The applicant has justified the proposed amendment to DPS 2 by referencing Additional Uses on lots surrounding the subject site as discussed in Table 2. Administration's comments have been included in this table in regards to each Additional Use. Attachment 3 shows the subject site and the surrounding lots with approved Additional Uses under DPS 2.
|
No. |
Property Address |
Additional Use |
Administration Comment |
|
A2 |
1964 Wanneroo Road Neerabup |
Sale of birds, bird seed and associated bird accessories. |
It is considered that this additional use is consistent with the character of the General Rural zone and does not compromise the amenity of the area. |
|
A3 |
1976 Wanneroo Road Neerabup |
Sale of wildflower & wildflower seeds, nuts and cones; sale of gift-packed quarantined native plants; sale of arts and crafts made from wildflowers and native plants; sale of souvenirs featuring wildflowers and native plants; sale of light refreshments. |
It is considered that this additional use is consistent with the character of the General Rural zone and does not compromise the amenity of the area. |
|
A4 |
2038 Wanneroo Road Neerabup |
Hardware store/ automotive repairs/ service station. |
Whilst it can be argued that the service station and associated motor vehicle repairs are contrary to the objective of the General Rural zone, the service station has been strategically placed in order to service the surrounding area and passing tourists who use Wanneroo Road. |
|
A18 |
Lot 32 Menchetti Road Neerabup |
Rural store not exceeding 100m2. |
The rural store is required to be no more than 100m2 in size. The store is capable of servicing the immediate area and as such, contributes to the rural amenity of the area. |
|
A24 |
1980 Wanneroo Road Neerabup |
Treating, processing and packing of apiary products. |
It is considered that this additional use is consistent with the character of the General Rural zone and does not compromise the amenity of the area. |
|
A29 |
Portion of Lot 27 Wanneroo Road Neerabup |
Sale of vegetable and flower seeds; sale of stockfeed; sale of fertiliser, fungicides and insecticides; sale and repair of farm machinery, farming implements and irrigation equipment; showroom and hardware area for the display and sale of items related to the agricultural industry, with a maximum area open to the public of 2,000m2; warehouse for storage of the above items (not open to the public for sale of goods). |
It is considered that this additional use is consistent with the character of the General Rural zone and does not compromise the amenity of the area. |
Table 2: Additional Uses Permitted Under DPS 2 Surrounding the Subject Site.
It is the view of Administration that the approved Additional Uses, discussed in the table above, are appropriate uses within the locality. The impact of the Additional Uses on the surrounding landowners is minor and the amenity and character of the area is not compromised through these Additional Uses.
History of Operation
The applicant further justified the proposed Additional Uses through the ongoing operations of the site and stated 'the existing land use and development on the subject site have been operating for at least twenty years without issue or compliant from the immediate neighbours'. The historical operations of a business do not legitimise the proposal nor does it give grounds for supporting the application. It is noted, however, that the City does not have any formal complaints on record from adjoining landowners in regards to the operations of the subject site. The City did, however, receive correspondence from a nearby landowner who was enquiring about the permissibility of the operations of the subject site. Should this amendment be initiated by Council, the proposal will be advertised to adjoining landowners for comment.
Temporary Approval
As explained earlier in the report, Administration does not consider the Additional Uses to be appropriate within the General Rural zone. However, a temporary approval for the Additional Uses is supported for the following reasons:
· The subject site has been operating as a Transport Depot since prior to 1995; and City records do not show any formal complaints in regards to the operations of the subject site.
· The landowners advise they intend to sell the subject site in the future. A temporary approval will enable the landowners to continue operating legitimately until the subject site is sold.
· The temporary approval will allow Administration to reassess the appropriateness and impact of the Additional Uses at a later stage and as such ensure that non-rural uses are not permanently approved under DPS 2.
The proposal is for temporary approval to be granted for a period of 5 years, as discussed by the landowner, applicant and Administration. This will allow adequate time for the landowners to relocate their business and sell the subject site. Should additional time be required at this stage and, upon application to the City, a further 5 years may be approved where it is demonstrated that the Additional Uses are not adversely impacting on the adjoining landowners and the amenity of the area. Furthermore, Administration will give due regard to the following, when considering a further 5 year approval for the Additional Uses:
· The amenity of the locality;
· The requirements of orderly and proper planning;
· The appropriateness of the continuation of the Additional Uses within the General Rural zone;
· Comments from surrounding landowners;
· Traffic impacts;
· Dust; and
· Any other matters required to be given consideration under DPS 2.
The Additional Uses proposed will be subject to a Development Application being approved and any conditions imposed as part of any planning approval issued. Furthermore, under Schedule 2 of DPS 2 conditions will be imposed in regards to the total area which can be utilised for the proposed Additional Uses and limitations on the number of employees for the proposed Office use (depicted in Table 3). This will ensure that the proposed Additional Uses do not increase in size from what is currently operating. Attachment 4 illustrates the area to which the Additional Uses will apply on the subject lots.
|
No. |
STREET/ LOCALITY |
PARTICULARS OF LAND |
ADDITIONAL USE AND CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE) |
|
1 - 36 |
Wanneroo Road, Neerabup |
Portion of Lot 43; and Portion of lot 44 |
Motor Vehicle Repairs Office Storage Yard Transport Depot Conditions: 1. The additional use shall be limited to the following: Motor Vehicle Repairs, that does not occupy an area greater than 250m2. Office, employing a maximum of four persons and otherwise complies with paragraphs (a) – (c) and (e) – (j) inclusive of the Home Business – Category 3 definition in Schedule 1of the Scheme. 2. Duration of Planning Approval:
(a) A planning approval for the above-listed uses and developments shall be limited to a period of 5 years from the date of gazettal of these additional uses.
(b) A renewal of planning approval for the above-listed uses may be granted for a period not to exceed 5 years, following the expiration at the 5 year approval referred to in 2(a), unless the renewal in a particular case is expressed to be for a shorter period.
(c) A separate application for Planning Approval is required to be submitted for consideration and determination by the City prior to the continuation of the Additional Uses. Administration will give due regard to the following, when considering a further 5 year approval for the Additional Uses: · The amenity of the locality;
· The requirements of orderly and proper planning; · The appropriateness of the continuation of the Additional Uses within the General Rural zone; · Comments from surrounding landowners; · Traffic impacts; · Dust; and · Any other matters required to be given consideration under DPS 2. |
Table 3: Additional Uses Table
Conclusion
Administration recommends that Council initiates the proposed Amendment No. 143 to DPS 2 to allow for temporary approval for the proposed Additional Uses of Transport Depot, Storage Yard, Motor Vehicle Repairs and Office on Lots 43 and 44 Wanneroo Road, Neerabup for the reasons outlined above.
Statutory Compliance
The scheme amendment will follow the statutory process outlined in the Town Planning Regulations 1967.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
As part of the future review of the City's Local Planning Policy 4.14 – Planning Compliance, due regard will be given to the ability to consider temporary approvals for Additional Uses under Schedule 2 – Section 1 of DPS 2.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
1. That Council, Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, INITIATES Amendment No. 143 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 by amending Schedule 2 – Section 1 (Clause 3.20) – Additional Uses to insert the following:
|
No. |
STREET/ LOCALITY |
PARTICULARS OF LAND |
ADDITIONAL USE AND CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE) |
|
1 - 36 |
Wanneroo Road, Neerabup |
Portion of Lot 43; and Portion of lot 44 |
Motor Vehicle Repairs Office Storage Yard Transport Depot Conditions: 1. The additional use shall be limited to the following: Motor Vehicle Repairs, that does not occupy an area greater than 250m2. Office, employing a maximum of four persons and otherwise complies with paragraphs (a) – (c) and (e) – (j) inclusive of the Home Business – Category 3 definition in Schedule 1of the Scheme. 2. Duration of Planning Approval:
(a) A planning approval for the above-listed uses and developments shall be limited to a period of 5 years from the date of gazettal of these additional uses.
(b) A renewal of planning approval for the above-listed uses may be granted for a period not to exceed 5 years, following the expiration at the 5 year approval referred to in 2(a), unless the renewal in a particular case is expressed to be for a shorter period.
(c) A separate application for Planning Approval is required to be submitted for consideration and determination by the City prior to the continuation of the Additional Uses. Administration will give due regard to the following, when considering a further 5 year approval for the Additional Uses: · The amenity of the locality; · The requirements of orderly and proper planning; · The appropriateness of the continuation of the Additional Uses within the General Rural zone; · Comments from surrounding landowners; · Traffic impacts; · Dust; and · Any other matters required to be given consideration under DPS 2. |
2. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, FORWARDS Amendment No. 143 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment;
3. Subject to no objection being received from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), ADVERTISES Amendment No. 143 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for public comment for a period of 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 25(2) of the Town Planning Regulations 1967; and
4. FORWARDS a copy of Amendment No. 143 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consent to advertise.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 Subject Site and DPS 2 Zoning |
15/36767 |
|
|
2. |
Amendment Plan Showing Existing Zoning and Additional Uses and Proposed Additional Uses |
15/36768 |
|
|
3. |
Surrounding Properties with Additional Uses Under DPS 2 |
15/36765 |
|
|
4. |
Subject Site with Arial Overlay Showing Amendment Area |
15/36771 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 17
File Ref: 3290 – 13/246032
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider final adoption of the East Wanneroo Cell 9 – East Landsdale Local Structure Plan No. 57 (LSP 57) with reference to the modifications required by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).
|
Applicant |
Development Planning Strategies |
|
Owner |
Various – a list of all the landowners has been placed on the Hub |
|
Location |
East Landsdale |
|
Site Area |
Approximately 215 hectares (ha) |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Background
East Wanneroo Cell 9 is bounded by Gnangara Road to the north, Alexander Drive to the east, Hepburn Avenue to the south and the developed locality of Landsdale to the west.
Attachment 1 contains a copy of the structure plan map.
The key elements of LSP 57 are as follows:
1. A residential density of R20/R30 ensuring an average lot size of 500m2 within the structure plan area;
2. 10% Public Open Space (POS), which includes an integrated linear open space system and the retention of Conservation Category and Resource Enhancement wetlands and associated buffer areas located within the structure plan area;
3. A permeable and robust road network. The existing Queensway Road, Kingsway and Landsdale Road provide east-west movement. A north-south neighbourhood connector is proposed linking Gnangara Road and Landsdale Road;
4. Pedestrian Access Way (PAW) connections to Kevo Place, Graywood Court, Rosebud Court, Mossfiel Retreat and Strathpine Chase in Landsdale;
5. Two Commercial zoned sites. The northern commercial site is proposed to be located at the south-western corner of Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive and the southern site at the north-western corner of Landsdale Road and Alexander Drive; and
6. A Government Primary School along with shared use of a full sized oval located to the south of Kingsway.
LSP 57 had been previously considered by Council on four occasions as discussed below.
Council, at its meeting of 30 June 2009, considered LSP 57 following two rounds of public advertising and resolved that it was satisfactory subject to modifications (Item PS09-06/09).
On 24 August 2010, the WAPC advised the City that it resolved to adopt LSP 57 subject to a number of modifications.
Council, at its meeting of 16 November 2010, considered the WAPC’s modifications and resolved as follows (Item PS02-11/10):
"That Council:-
1. Pursuant to subclauses 9.4.1(c) and 9.6.3(c) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that Local Structure Plan No. 57, as adopted by the Western Australian Planning Commission, be not agreed to, by virtue of the Western Australian Planning Commission's modification nos. 14 and 15 being unacceptable to Council; and
2. ADVISES the Western Australian Planning Commission, the applicant and landowners of properties in Strathpine Chase, Mossfiel Retreat, Grayswood Court, Kevo Place, Hamel Close and Rosebud Court, Landsdale, of its decision to not agree to Local Structure Plan No. 57, as adopted by the Western Australian Planning Commission."
Modification No. 14 required the replacement of the proposed PAW connections to Kevo Place, Graywood Court, Rosebud Court, Mossfiel Retreat and Strathpine Crescent with vehicular accesses. Modification No. 15 required the deletion of the access point on to Alexander Drive to the immediate north of the southern commercial site.
Council at its Meeting of 26 June 2012 reconsidered the LSP 57 specifically with reference to Modifications No. 14 and 15 and resolved, in part, as follows (Item PS06-06/12):
"That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.3 (c) of District Planning Scheme No.2, REQUESTS Development Planning Strategies acting on behalf of Stockland WA Development Pty Ltd to MODIFY the East Wanneroo Cell 9 – East Landsdale Local Structure Plan No. 57 adopted by Council on 30 June 2009 (Item PS09-06/09):
a) as required by the Western Australian Planning Commission in its list of modifications contained in Attachment 2 to this report excepting for Modifications No. 14 and 15;
b) to include the following additional provision in section 13.4.3 of the statutory section,
“Appropriate connections be provided to Kevo Place, Grayswood Court, Mossfiel Retreat and Strathpine Chase at the time of subdivision of the adjoining land within the structure plan area”; and
c) to depict the east-west subdivisional road and Alexander Drive intersection adjoining the northern boundary of the southern Centre Zone as a left-in/left-out intersection in the structure plan maps;"
In regard to 1 b) above it is noted that the Commission agreed to ‘appropriate connections’ to Kevo Place, Grayswood Court, Mossfiel Retreat and Strathpine Chase instead of ‘vehicular accesses’ based on a traffic study undertaken by the City.
The WAPC at its meeting of 12 February 2013 considered the modified LSP 57 and resolved to adopt it subject to further modifications including the introduction of the following new subclause 12.3.6:
12.3.6 Commercial Design Provisions
"Vehicular Access and parking areas being located on the western side of the Commercial zoned sites to minimise radio-frequency interference to the Perth International Telecommunications Centre, in consultation with Telstra".
Council, at its meeting of 30 April 2013, considered the final adoption of LSP 57 with reference to the modifications required by the WAPC (Item PS07-04/13) and resolved to include the new subclause 12.3.6 however, by deleting the words 'Vehicular Access and' and replacing them with the words "Where practicable" at the beginning of the subclause. Attachment 2 contains an extract of the statutory section of LSP 57, which includes the new subclause 12.3.6 as resolved by Council.
Following consideration of the modified LSP 57, the WAPC in its correspondence of 22 July 2013 advised the City that it resolved to refuse to adopt LSP 57 as the new subclause was not worded exactly as required by the WAPC.
Although the WAPC in its correspondence of 22 July 2013 advised that it resolved not to adopt LSP 57, the City could not immediately take further action to progress the adoption of LSP 57 for reasons as outlined below:
A commercial site is proposed on Lot 1981 Gnangara Road, Landsdale located at the south-western corner of Gnangara Road and Alexander Drive.
In May 2013, the WAPC had granted approval to subdivide Lot 1981 Gnangara Road to create several residential lots and the northern commercial site (WAPC Ref: 146383). One of the subdivision conditions was to prohibit vehicular access on to the site from both Alexander Drive and Gnangara Road. Attachment 3 contains the approved subdivision plan. The proponent was of the view that by denying access to the commercial site from both these roads, any commercial development will not be viable as it would not attract passing trade. Aggrieved by the WAPC's decision, the applicant sought a review of the decision at the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT). Consequently, under the provisions of subclause 9.12.6 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2), the City could not proceed with the adoption of the LSP 57 until such time the SAT made a determination on the application.
Subclause 9.12.6 of DPS 2 states as follows:
“If, after an appeal has been determined, any requirement of the Council or the appeal body arising from the appeal remains to be complied with, that requirement shall be complied with before the process of preparation and adoption of the structure plan is continued.”
In regard to the above DPS 2 provision it is noted that if the appeal were to be upheld by the SAT, then it would have a bearing on the new LSP 57 subclause 12.3.6 as recommended by the WAPC. However, on 11 November 2014, the SAT advised the WAPC that the appellant had withdrawn his application. Therefore the adoption of LSP 57 can be now be considered as recommended by the WAPC.
Detail
In regard to the new subclause 12.3.6 Department of Planning officers have clarified that this new subclause needs to be worded verbatim as required by the WAPC to address the concerns raised by Telstra to reduce interference with the radio frequency from the Perth International Telecommunications Centre (PITC) located east of the LSP 57 area.
Consultation
Subclause 9.6.3(c) of DPS 2 states that if the WAPC requires modifications to the Structure Plan, the proponent shall make the modifications in consultation with the City or Council may make the modifications and then the modified structure plan is to be resubmitted to the City for consideration under Clause 9.4. Under subclause 9.4.1(a), Council may waive public notification of the modified structure plan when it considers that adequate publicity of the structure plan has already been undertaken. The modification only relates to access arrangements to the commercial sites and does not change the zoning of these sites. Therefore the modification required by the WAPC does not affect the objectives and principles of the LSP 57. It is therefore recommended to waive public notification of the modified LSP 57 as the modifications requested by the WAPC would not materially affect the intent of the structure plan.
Comment
Allerding & Associates planning consultant representing Telstra have advised the City that by allowing vehicular access and parking on the eastern side of the commercial zoned sites, the remote control devices used to lock and unlock cars could interfere with the radio frequency from PITC. Telstra has therefore requested the inclusion of the provision to ensure that vehicular access and parking areas are located on the western side of the commercial sites. Telstra’s request was based on a detailed scientific research undertaken by Telstra. It is therefore recommended that subclause 12.3.6 be modified as follows:
12.3.6 Commercial Design Provisions
"Vehicular Access and parking areas being located on the western side of the Commercial zoned sites to minimise radio-frequency interference to the Perth International Telecommunications Centre, in consultation with Telstra".
Conclusion
The WAPC has requested the City to modify LSP 57 verbatim as required in its correspondence of 13 February 2013. Since the proposed modifications would not alter the intent of LSP 57, it is recommended that public notification of the modified LSP 57 be waived and to adopt and forward it to the WAPC for its adoption and certification.
Statutory Compliance
LSP 57 has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2.
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Policy Implications
LSP 57 has been assessed as per the provisions of City's Local Planning Policy 4.2 – Structure Planning.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.4.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 DETERMINES that the East Wanneroo Cell 9 – East Landsdale Local Structure Plan No. 57, as submitted by Development Planning Strategies on behalf of Stockland WA Development Pty Ltd is satisfactory subject to modifying subclause 12.3.6 as follows to the satisfaction of the Manager, Planning Implementation and WAIVES the requirement to re-advertise the modified structure plan since adequate publicity of the structure plan has already been undertaken and SUBMITS three copies of the modified structure plan document to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its certification:-
12.3.6 Commercial Design Provisions:
"Vehicular Access and parking areas being located on the western side of the Commercial zoned sites to minimise radio-frequency interference to the Perth International Telecommunications Centre, in consultation with Telstra"; and
2. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the modified East Wanneroo Cell 9 – East Landsdale Structure Plan No. 57 and AUTHORISES the Director, Planning and Sustainability to SIGN the Structure Plan documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission and RETURNS one copy of the certified document to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
Attachments:
|
1. |
LSP 57 - Att - 1 |
14/3871 |
|
|
2. |
LSP 57 - Att 2 |
13/120436 |
|
|
3. |
LSP 57 - Att - 3 |
13/120439 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 25
File Ref: 10803 – 15/2277
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider the submissions received during the public advertising period, and the adoption of Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2).
|
Applicant |
TPG Town Planning, Urban Design and Heritage |
|
Owner |
Whitford Church of Christ Inc |
|
Location |
Lot 908 (869) Connolly Drive, Merriwa |
|
Site Area |
1.616 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Residential |
Background
The subject site is located at Lot 908 (869) Connolly Drive, Merriwa and comprises 1.616 hectares. The site is bound by Connolly Drive to the east and Jenolan Way to the north, and the Royal Australian Air Force Association (RAAFA) Cambrai Village retirement village to the south and west. The subject site is zoned Residential under DPS 2 and is currently vacant. A plan showing the location of the subject site is included as Attachment 1.
On 12 August 2013, TPG Town Planning, Urban Design and Heritage (the applicant), on behalf of the landowner, Whitford Church of Christ, lodged proposed Amendment No. 138 to DPS 2 with the City.
Attachment 2 contains the proposed Scheme Amendment documentation.
Council, at its meeting of 16 September 2014 considered the proposal and resolved as follows (refer Item PS02-09/14):
“That Council:
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, INITIATES Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 by amending Schedule 2 – Section 1 (Clause 3.20) – Additional Uses to insert the following:
|
NO |
STREET/LOCALITY |
PARTICULARS OF LAND |
ADDITIONAL USE AND CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE) |
|
1 - 36 |
869 Connolly Drive, Merriwa |
Lot 908 |
Place of Assembly
Condition:
Development Application for 'Place of Assembly' to be subject to advertising, in accordance with DPS No. 2 requirements |
2. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, FORWARDS Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment;
3. Subject to no objection being received from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), ADVERTISES Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for public comment for a period of 42 days, pursuant to Regulation 25(2) of the Town Planning Regulation 1967; and
4. FORWARDS a copy of Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its information."
On 24 December 2014, the City approved a Development Application (DA2014/561) for a Place of Worship and a Child Care Centre on the site. This approval included an auditorium and a child care centre building, 216 car bays, and four crossovers onto Jenolan Way (the approved site plan is included as Attachment 3). Under DPS 2, a Place of Worship is an ‘A’ use, requiring public notification of the proposal, and a Child Care Centre is a discretionary ‘D’ use within a Residential zone. Notwithstanding this, the existing approval on the site has no bearing on the outcome of the proposed Amendment.
Detail
The proposal seeks to amend DPS 2, pursuant to Clause 3.20, by inserting the additional use of Place of Assembly to Schedule 2 – Section 1 for Lot 908 (869) Connolly Drive, Merriwa, on the condition that any Development Application for a Place of Assembly require public advertising to be undertaken.
Place of Assembly as defined under DPS 2 "means premises where the public assemble or go for any cultural, religious, recreational, sporting or other activity save that where the scale of development proposed is greater than can be reasonably accommodated in any area, the use shall be dealt with as a Special Place of Assembly".
Within a Residential zone, a Place of Assembly is an 'X' use, meaning that the use is not permitted. The purpose of the proposed Amendment is to permit the consideration of a Place of Assembly on the subject site. This will facilitate the development of a community hub for the Whitford Church on the site, including a Place of Assembly, and the approved Place of Worship and Child Care Centre. This community hub will operate a number of activities in conjunction with these uses, which are explained below in the Comment section.
Under DPS 2 a Place of Worship “includes buildings used primarily for the religious activities of a church, but does not include an institution for primary, secondary or higher education, or a residential training institution.” Place of Worship and Place of Assembly are similar land uses, however the Place of Assembly use includes activities which are not of a religious nature. As such, the Place of Assembly use is necessary to facilitate the non-religious community services and programs that the Whitford Church proposes to be carried out on the site.
A masterplan for the site is provided in Attachment 4, although it is important to note that this is indicative only, and detailed design of the proposal will be submitted to the City as part of a future Development Application for a Place of Assembly, and subsequently assessed.
Consultation
In accordance with Council’s decision on 16 September 2014, the Amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment. On 27 October 2014, the EPA advised the City that the Scheme Amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. The WAPC’s consent to advertise was not required in this case.
A 42 day public advertising period was carried out between 18 November 2014 and 2 January 2015 by way of an on-site sign, advertisement in the local newspaper, a notice in Council offices and the City’s website, and letters to nearby landowners. The City received two submissions from government agencies during this period, both of which were non-objections. A summary of these, and Administration's response is provided in Attachment 5.
The applicant also conducted their own community consultation with surrounding residents and relevant stakeholders prior to lodging the Amendment with the City. This involved a letter drop which provided information on the proposal to nearby residents, and several information sessions held at a local community centre. The outcomes of this consultation were included in a community consultation report submitted with the proposed Amendment, which concluded that there was a high degree of community support for the proposal.
Comment
Administration has assessed the proposed Amendment, and identified that the key issues surrounding the proposal are:
· The suitability of the additional land use;
· The suitability of the location; and
· The impact of traffic on the surrounding road network.
Administration’s comment on these issues, as well as the condition applicable to the additional use, is provided below.
Suitability of Land Use
The purpose of the proposed Amendment is to allow for the development of a community hub on the subject site. The services and programs that are to be operated from the site include:
· After school youth groups, tutoring, computer classes for seniors, free counselling services, parenting and marriage courses' and other activities run by Whitford Church;
· The provision of a multi-purpose sports area on the site, to be managed by Whitford Church for community use, providing a place for informal recreational and sporting activities;
· An op-shop and cafe which are to be operated by Whitford Church, to be used only for the staff and public using the facilities and programs on the site; and
· An office for Whitford Church staff that are based at the site, and is not to be leased externally.
Administration considers that the intended future activities and uses are suitable as they are part of the future operation of the site by Whitford Church and fall within, or are incidental to, the definition of Place of Assembly. These activities will facilitate the development of a community hub that is not restricted to only the religious activities of a Place of Worship, which is currently approved on the site.
Suitability of Location
As the subject site is zoned Residential, it is prudent to consider whether the subject location is suitable to accommodate the Place of Assembly as an additional use. The subject site is considered suitable for the following reasons:
· The Place of Assembly will operate in conjunction with the Place of Worship and Child Care Centre approved under DA2014/561, rather than as a stand-alone land use, and will allow the site to be developed as a community hub;
· The use is considered to be appropriate in the context of surrounding uses, which includes local shops and community facilities along the western portion of Jenolan Way. These uses are considered to be compatible with the Place of Assembly as it will provide an additional range of community services and facilities available to surrounding residents;
· The site is easily accessed by the public, as it is in close proximity to bus stops along Jenolan Way and Connolly Drive, and is located adjacent to a major road (Connolly Drive); and
· No objections were received from the public during the consultation period.
Based on the above, Administration considers that the location of subject site is suitable to accommodate the additional use of Place of Assembly.
Traffic Impact
The proposed Amendment is to enable the future development of a community hub on the site. The development of this community hub will result in an increase of traffic on the surrounding roads.
A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) was prepared by KC Traffic and Transport, on behalf of the applicant, to consider the impact that additional traffic will have on the surrounding road network.
The TIA, which has been reviewed and is considered acceptable to the City, indicates an additional 1,156 total vehicles are expected to access the site should it be fully developed as a result of the proposed Amendment.
The current and proposed vehicle trips per day (vtpd) along Connolly Drive and Jenolan Way, and the capacity of these roads under the Western Australian Planning Commission’s Liveable Neighbourhoods policy (LN), is shown below.
|
Road |
LN Indicative Volume |
Current VTPD |
Proposed VTPD |
Difference VTPD |
|
Connolly Drive |
15,000 to 35,000 |
19,258 |
19,920 |
+662 |
|
Jenolan Way |
6,000 |
2,498 |
3,074 |
+578 |
As shown above, the estimated traffic volumes for Connolly Drive and Jenolan Way remain within the LN indicative volumes. It is noted that some vehicles are expected to utilise both Connolly Drive and Jenolan Way, which results in a discrepancy between the overall number of vehicles accessing the site, and the vtpd for each street.
This demonstrates that the existing road network is capable of accommodating the increase in traffic volume that will be generated as a result of the proposed Amendment, and the development of the site as a community hub.
Condition of Additional Use
The Amendment proposes to include a Place of Assembly as an additional use for the site subject to a condition requiring the use to be advertised for public comment when a Development Application is lodged. Any Development Application received by the City will be assessed against the provisions of DPS 2.
As a Place of Assembly includes a broad range of activities, and is to be located within a Residential zone, it is considered appropriate that the surrounding residents be given the opportunity to comment on any application for a Place of Assembly received by the City. Any comments received will inform the assessment of the Development Application by the City, and provide the opportunity for any issues to be addressed by the proponent.
Conclusion
In light of the above, Administration considers the proposed Amendment is acceptable for the following reasons:
· The Place of Assembly is considered suitable to accommodate the intended activities from the site to enable it to be developed as a community hub;
· The subject location is considered suitable to accommodate the Place of Assembly as it is in close proximity to public transport, other community and commercial uses, and it will operate in conjunction with a Place of Worship and Child Care Centre previously approved on the site;
· The increased traffic that will result from the proposed Amendment is capable of being accommodated within the existing road network; and
· Any future Development Application received by the City for a Place of Assembly on the site will be subject to public consultation in accordance with DPS 2 requirements.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the Amendment proposal be adopted without modification and forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 138 has been processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Town Planning Regulations 1967.
In accordance with Regulation 17(2), Council is required to consider the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 138 and must resolve to either (a) adopt the Amendment with or without modification, or (b) not proceed with the Amendment.
Further, pursuant to Regulation 18(1), within 28 days of the passing of that resolution, the City must provide the WAPC with (among other things) a schedule of submissions and Council's recommendation and response to the submissions, together with particulars of any modifications recommended to the Amendment.
Administration recommends that Council adopts Amendment No. 138 in accordance with Regulation 17(2)(a), without modification).
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Regulation 17(2)(a) of the Town Planning Regulations 1967, ADOPTS Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, without any modification, as follows;
|
NO |
STREET/LOCALITY |
PARTICULARS OF LAND |
ADDITIONAL USE AND CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE) |
|
1 - 36 |
869 Connolly Drive, Merriwa |
Lot 908 |
Place of Assembly
Condition:
Development Application for 'Place of Assembly' to be subject to advertising, in accordance with DPS No. 2 requirements |
2. Pursuant to Regulations 22 and 25 of the Town Planning Regulations 1967, AUTHORISES the affixing of the common seal to, and endorses the signing of, the Amendment No. 138 documentation by the Director, Planning and Sustainability;
3. NOTES the Schedule of Submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 138 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 included as Attachment 5, ENDORSES Administration’s comments and recommendations in response to those submissions, FORWARDS the Schedule of Submissions to the Western Australian Planning Commission and ADVISES the submitters of its decision; and
4. FORWARDS the Amendment No. 138 documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration, REQUESTING the Hon. Minister for Planning grant final approval of the Amendment.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan |
14/228032 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Amendment 138 Document |
14/321017 |
|
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - DA2014/561 Approved Site Plan |
15/22867 |
|
|
4. |
Attachment 4 - Indicative Masterplan |
14/225982 |
|
|
5. |
Attachment 5 - Schedule of Submissions |
15/2605 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 50
AMENDMENT No. 138 DISTRICT PLANNING SCHEME NO. 2
SCHEDULE OF SUBMISSIONS FOLLOWING ADVERTISING
(Closed 2 January 2015)
|
No. |
Summary of Submission |
Administration Response |
Recommendation |
|
1 |
Western Power |
||
|
As there is/are overhead/underground distribution/transmission lines/cables/easement adjacent to your proposed works, Western Power will review the proposal with respect to any impact on its network and respond within an appropriate timeframe if required.
As there are overhead power lines and/or underground cables, adjacent to or traversing the property the following should be considered prior to any works commencing. This information should be considered when planning works although it should be noted that the provision of this safety information does not indicate an approval of these works to proceed.
It is responsibility of the person in control of the workplace to ensure that works comply with regulation 3.64 (1) and (2) of the Occupational Health Regulations 1996.
Western Power is obliged to point out that any change to the existing power system, if required, is the responsibility of the individual developer. |
Noted. |
No modification required. |
|
|
2 |
Department of Education |
||
|
|
The Department of Education has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to the Amendment |
Noted. |
No modification required. |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 51
File Ref: 7535 – 15/34535
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider submissions on the proposed Woodland Vista, Carramar Local Structure Plan No. 92 (LSP 92) to determine its acceptability for final approval and forwarding to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for endorsement.
|
Applicant |
Burgess Design Group |
|
Owner |
Woodland Consortium Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 51 Flynn Drive, Carramar |
|
Site Area |
3.03ha |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
Background
Proposed LSP 92 was originally submitted on 22 May 2012, but as the structure plan area was subject to a pending Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) amendment to rezone the site from Rural to Urban at the time, consideration of the structure plan prior to the finalisation of the MRS amendment was considered premature.
The structure plan area was rezoned from Rural to Urban under the MRS upon gazettal on 1 October 2013. Concurrently, the site was rezoned from Special Rural to Urban Development under the City's District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). The Urban Development zone requires the preparation of a structure plan to guide the subdivision and development of the land, in accordance with Clause 3.13.3 of DPS 2, and as such it was appropriate to consider the lodged structure plan at this time.
The structure plan, as originally lodged, required additional information and format changes prior to consideration of advertising. These changes were subsequently made, and the proposal was deemed sufficient for the purposes of advertising.
On 12 June 2014, the former Director, Planning and Sustainability forwarded a memorandum to all Elected Members, providing the opportunity for members to request referral of the proposal to Council for consent to advertise. No such requests were received and, as such, advertising of LSP 92 commenced on 15 July 2014 in accordance with Clause 9.5 of District DPS 2 and closed on 26 August 2014.
The item was considered at the Ordinary Council meeting of 3 February 2015, but the resolution for approval of the item proposed by Administration lapsed for want of a mover, and there was no alternate recommendation put forward. As no Elected Members voted, as required by Section 5.21 of the Local Government Act 1995, and there was no determination made on the proposed LSP, as is required by Clause 9.6.1, the item has been re-submitted for Council's consideration.
Detail
Site
The structure plan covers Lot 51 (575) Flynn Drive, Carramar, a triangular shaped lot encompassing a total area of approximately 3 hectares. The site is bound by Wanneroo Road to the west, Flynn Drive (in its existing alignment) to the north, and Lots 1 and 2 Flynn Drive to the east, which are subject to Agreed Structure Plan No. 61 (ASP 61). The subject land is zoned Urban under the MRS and Urban Development under DPS 2. A location plan is included as Attachment 1.
Wanneroo Road is classified as a Primary Distributor Road where it abuts the structure plan area. Flynn Drive is classified as a Regional Distributor Road, however, future realignment of Flynn Drive will result in a signalised intersection with Wanneroo Road approximately 600m to the north of the site and the existing alignment of Flynn Drive, which is subsequently intended to be converted to a cul-de-sac.
Proposal
The draft LSP 92, as shown in Attachment 2, has been prepared to provide the broad planning framework to facilitate development of the area and to satisfy the requirements of DPS 2. The site is proposed to be zoned Residential, with a density code range of R20 to R30.
LSP 92 will guide the subdivision and development of the land, by providing the framework for the creation of the following:
· Residential zoned lots at R20 and R30 densities;
· Proposed public open space (POS), equating to 10% or greater of the subdivisible area; and
· Drainage area proposed at the southernmost point of the site.
Consultation
The draft LSP was advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper, a notice on the City’s website and letters written to adjoining landowners. The submission period closed on 26 August 2014, with seven submissions being received. A summary of submissions received and Administration's responses to these is included in Attachment 3.
The main issues raised during the advertising period and following detailed assessment by Administration relate to:
· The proposed structure plan format;
· Proposed densities across the site; and
· The provisions and mitigation measures contained within the associated Bushfire Management Plan, which was submitted by the proponent as Appendix 5 to Part 3 of draft LSP 92.
A more detailed discussion of the major issues considered in the assessment of draft LSP 92 is provided in the Comment section.
Comment
Structure Plan Format
The format of the proposed structure plan Part 1 (Statutory Section) is in line with that set out in the City's Local Planning Policy 4.2: Structure Planning (LPP 4.2). Notwithstanding, it is considered appropriate to bring the format of the proposed structure plan in line with that of the Western Australian Planning Commission's (WAPC) Structure Plan Preparation Guidelines, which will provide continuity with other recently endorsed structure plans within the City. It is noted that the City's LPP 4.2 is currently under review to update the policy and bring it in line with the WAPC's Structure Plan Preparation Guidelines.
Further to the format of Part 1, Administration recommends detailed information be removed from the structure plan map, in accordance with the WAPC's Structure Plan Preparation Guidelines. Such information to be removed includes, but is not limited to, road layouts, POS location, and drainage. The removal of these details at the structure plan stage will allow for a more flexible and adaptable design approach at the subdivision stage, rather than designating specific road locations and lot layouts at this stage of the planning process. In the past, other structure plans proposing a high level of detail on the structure plan map have been subject to structure plan amendments subsequently, as a result of minor inconsistencies or design changes at the subdivision stage.
These modifications to the proposed structure plan, as well as Administration's reasons for these modifications are further detailed in Attachment 4.
Proposed Density
Draft LSP 92 currently proposes specific residential density codes (R-Codes) over the site; predominantly R20, with an area of R30 adjacent to the proposed POS and indicative laneway lots. Several submissions received raised concerns regarding the appropriateness of the proposed densities.
The subject site was rezoned from Rural to Urban as part of Amendment 1244/57 to the MRS. As part of this amendment process, it was indicated in the amendment report that the intended density of the site would range between R20 and R40. As the site was concurrently zoned Urban Development (which requires a structure plan to be in place to guide development and subdivision) under the City's DPS 2 rather than a zoning such as Residential, no density code was allocated under the amendment process.
Having due regard to the intended density throughout the amendment process, the proposed density is also considered appropriate in the context of the urban nature of the site, and the density range of the adjoining ASP 61 area (Special Residential R5, and Residential R20 – R50). To provide context, the approved subdivision of the adjacent ASP 61 area proposes the following lot types and densities:-
· 4 x superlots adjacent to the proposed Private Open Space with a density range of R20 - R50 (yield unknown at this stage, but expected to be in the realm of 90-100 lots, potentially more if developed at the R50 density).
· 192 lots coded R30 (equating to 46.4% of the lots created, not including the superlot yield potentials). R30 lot require a minimum lot size of 260m², with an average of 300m².
· 17 lots coded R20 (equating to 4.1% of the lots created, not including the superlot yield potentials). R20 lots require a minimum lot size of 350m², with an average of 450m².
· 204 lots coded R5 (equating to 49.5% of the lots created, not including the superlot yield potentials). R2 lots require a minimum lot size of 5000m², although the structure plan allows for minimum 2000m².
The proposed densities of R20 and R30 of LSP 92 would result in an approximate yield of 41 dwellings, but may be less at the time of subdivision dependent on site constraints such as the Bushfire Management Plan Requirements and POS provision. The proposed densities of R20 and R30 are also consistent with the general density requirements of the WAPC's Directions 2031 and Beyond plan which recommends aiming for 15 dwellings per gross hectare; the current proposal has the potential to achieve approximately 14 dwellings per urban zoned hectare.
Notwithstanding Administration's support of the densities proposed by draft LSP 92 as detailed above, it is considered appropriate to remove the specific R-Code densities shown, which are delineated by the proposed road network, and instead incorporate an overall zoning and R-Coding of Residential R20/R30 over the structure plan area. The overall R-Coding will allow for a flexible detailed design approach of the site at the subdivision stage. The proposed modification will enable site-responsive design and densities at the subdivision stage, having due regard to the final road layouts, POS location and other design details.
As part of recommended Administration modifications within Attachment 4, guidance on the proposed split coding of R20/R30 will be provided in Part 1, with a base density of R20, and R30 being permitted where lots directly abut or are located adjacent to POS.
Bushfire Management Plan
A Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) was included as Appendix 5 of the Part 3 Technical Appendices of LSP 92, which provides supporting documentation for the statutory provisions contained within Part 1 of the LSP.
The Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) assessed the proposed BMP and raised a number of concerns with the BMP, with the main ones as follows:
· The draft BMP submitted contains an assessment of the vegetation and fuel classifications on the site and adjoining sites in order to provide an indicative Bushfire Hazard Assessment (BHA). The resultant fire ratings shown in the BMP are largely dependent upon the clearing of certain vegetation and fuel types from adjacent sites (being ASP 61 and the Neerabup National Park). There are concerns that this dependency on third party clearing and development has resulted in an inaccurate assessment and does not provide any certainty of potential bushfire attack levels.
· The BMP as submitted does not provide sufficient detail regarding emergency access provision onto Wanneroo Road. It is a requirement under draft State Planning Policy 3.7 – Planning for Bushfire Risk Management (SPP 3.7) and the WAPC's Planning for Bushfire Protection Guidelines that two different vehicular access routes, both of which connect to the public road network, are available to all residents/the public at all times. The emergency access has not been detailed adequately in regards to specific location and minimum requirements of physical construction (e.g. width, provision of gates etc) within the BMP. Further to this, approval would need to be sought from Main Roads WA to allow direct, albeit emergency, access onto Wanneroo Road.
In regards to the above matter of emergency access onto Wanneroo Road, Main Roads WA (MRWA) was contacted to provide specific comment on this matter. It is noted that this issue was not raised by MRWA in their submission, dated 15 August 2014, received during the advertising period. MRWA provided the following response in regards to the provision of emergency access onto Wanneroo Road from Lot 51 Flynn Drive (summarised):
· MRWA acknowledges the principles of SPP 3.7 in relation to emergency access and public safety. Similarly, in managing roads MRWA will also have due to regard to public safety for users of the road. MRWA cannot advise as to the legal precedence of the matter but would suggest that the Main Roads Act, being a legislated document, would take precedence over the SPP 3.7 in requiring two points of access, where that access may be onto a Primary Regional Road. The Act delegates the authority to the Commissioner of Main Roads to determine access, whereas SPP 3.7 is a policy and therefore does not have the same legal status. Nonetheless, Main Roads would have regard to the intent of SPP 3.7, as MRWA do to other SPP policy documents.
· When considering the previously submitted subdivision and structure plan for Lots 1 & 2 (ASP 61), MRWA then acknowledged the requirement for emergency access to Wanneroo Road and were satisfied that a connection in the south west corner of that site was an acceptable location for such an emergency access (see Attachment 5). By locating the access at the south west corner we sought to mitigate the issues related to the curve of Wanneroo Road as much as practically possible. It is MRWA's preference that there is a minimisation of access points to primary regional roads and that accesses are located at appropriate locations – with due regard to safety and efficiency. MRWA notes that an emergency access is going to be seldom used and access will be controlled, but still seek to minimise access locations. Accordingly MRWA would like to achieve an outcome where the two developments in this area are able to coordinate emergency access arrangements and rationalise two proposed emergency access points into one.
Given that Administration, MRWA and DFES are not satisfied with the BMP as currently proposed, it is considered appropriate to exclude the BMP from any approval of the LSP, and include a modification to require approval of the BMP to prior to subdivision. This will allow the applicants the time necessary to address all concerns raised by Administration, MRWA, DFES and the submissions received during advertising. The applicant has been made aware of the fact that until the BMP is considered satisfactory to the City, MRWA and DFES and is approved by the City of Wanneroo, no development or subdivision shall occur on this site. Once the BMP was deemed satisfactory, the subdivision would be able to be lodged, and any fire mitigation measures or design requirements within the approved BMP would be required to be fully implemented as part of the subdivision and subsequent development stages.
Further to the requirement to submit a revised BMP prior to subdivision, Administration considers it appropriate to designate the entire structure plan area, through a provision contained within Part 1 of LSP 92 and a designation on the structure plan map, as a 'Bushfire Prone Area'.
A Bushfire Prone Area is one identified either by a Local Government Bushfire Map, a State Bushfire-Prone Area Map or, in the absence of either of these maps, any land within 100 metres of an area of bushfire-prone vegetation equal to or greater than one hectare. Given that the site is within 100m of Neerabup National Park and the retained vegetation within ASP 61, it is considered appropriate to classify the structure plan area as Bushfire Prone. This process will clearly indicate within the statutory component of the LSP that further bushfire mitigation measures and actions are necessary, prior to any development occurring. This approach is considered to be consistent with the requirements of SPP 3.7.
Alternate Options
Should Council not be of a mind to support Administration's recommendation below, Elected Members may request an alternate recommendation of deferral, pending revision of the BMP and amendment of proposed dwelling densities.
Deferral of the item will allow for issues with the BMP to be resolved to the satisfaction of all relevant parties prior to endorsement of LSP 92. This will provide greater certainty in regards to bushfire management and emergency access issues. Deferral of the item may also enable consideration to be given to the proposed dwelling densities with regard to their appropriateness in the context of location and proximity to other proposed densities on adjoining land.
Deferring endorsement of LSP 92 in order to address Elected Member's concerns in regards to the proposed BMP and the proposed densities will enable these issues to be addressed prior to subdivision. it is noted, however, that deferral of this item will further exceed the determination timeframe of 120 days under DPS 2 in which Council must make a decision in regards to a proposed structure plan. If no decision has been made within this timeframe, the item is deemed refused under Clause 9.6.4 of DPS 2. The landowner/applicant then has the right of appeal at the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT).
Conclusion
Considering the above comments, the draft LSP 92 is considered to be acceptable, subject to modifications contained in Attachments 3 and 4, as the proposal provides the broad planning framework to facilitate future development and subdivision of the structure plan area.
Statutory Compliance
This structure plan has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2. Clause 9.6.1 of DPS 2 provides that following advertisement of a structure plan, Council may refuse to adopt the structure plan or resolve that the structure plan is satisfactory with or without modifications. It is recommended that LSP 92 be approved with modifications.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Administration's assessment of draft LSP 92 has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the City's Local Planning Policies, in particular Local Planning Policy 4.2 – Structure Planning (LPP 4.2), Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space (LPP 4.3), Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing Strategy (LPP 3.1) and Local Planning Policy 4.4: Urban Water Management (LPP 4.4)
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that the proposed Woodland Vista, Carramar Local Structure Plan No. 92 dated April 2014 submitted by Burgess Design Group on behalf of Woodland Consortium Pty Ltd included as Attachment 2 is SATISFACTORY subject to the recommended modifications contained within Attachments 3 and 4;
2. FORWARDS the duly modified Woodland Vista, Carramar Local Structure Plan No. 92 to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its adoption and certification pursuant to Clause 9.6.1 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2;
3. Pursuant to Clause 9.6.5 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, ADOPTS the Woodland Vista, Carramar Local Structure Plan No. 92 documents once certified by the Western Australian Planning Commission and AUTHORISES the Director, Planning and Sustainability to SIGN the documents; and
4. NOTES the Schedule of Submissions received in respect of the Woodland Vista, Carramar Local Structure Plan No. 92 included as Attachment 3, ENDORSES Administration's response to those submissions and ADVISES submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan (LSP 92) |
15/2720 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - LSP 92 Part 1 - Statutory Section |
15/2722 |
Minuted |
|
3. |
Attachment 3 - Schedule of Submissions - LSP 92 |
15/13406 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
Attachment 4 - Administration Recommended Modifications - LSP 92 |
15/13410 |
Minuted |
|
5. |
Attachment 5 - Lots 1 and 2 Flynn Drive Agreed Structure Plan No. 60 (Amendment 1) - Map |
15/39866 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 94
Land Development
3.5 Subdivisional Retaining Walls Over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489)
File Ref: SD149489 – 15/23877
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider approval of subdivisional development retaining walls at Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489) in two situations:
1. Retaining walls over 3m in height abutting road reserves (refer Attachment 1).
2. Internal retaining walls over 4m on the common boundary of proposed lots within the same subdivision area (refer Attachment 2).
Background
Council’s local planning policy (Policy No. 4.5) considers the following:
1. Walls up to 3.0m in height abutting the road reserve to be acceptable for construction by the Director of Planning and Sustainability and will be approved as part of subdivisional engineering drawings.
2. Walls up to 4.0m in height within common boundary of same ownership to be acceptable for construction by the City’s Engineer (in this case the Director of Planning and Sustainability) and will be approved as part of subdivisional engineering drawings.
Unless the City is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist, retaining walls exceeding these heights will not be approved. Consequently, this report provides details of the exceptional circumstances for Council's consideration.
The subject land is located within structure plan East Landsdale Cell 9. On 11 June 2014, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) granted subdivisional approval for 58 lots ranging from 442m2 to 514m2 (WAPC 149489). Engineering drawings have been submitted by Edge Consulting Engineers on behalf of the developer/owner depicting retaining wall height over 3m abutting road reserve and over 4m on the common boundary of the same subdivision area.
Detail
Design drawings have been prepared by the consultant showing the height and location of retaining walls. Maximum height exceedance for the retaining walls is required for two cases with the corresponding justifications as follows:
Case 1 - retaining wall height over 3m and up to 4m abutting road reserve (refer to Attachment 1):
1. Significant level drop of approximately 3.13m between the front and rear levels of lot 49 over a distance of 35m.
2. Gallica Way, the road in front of lot 49, cannot be lowered any more to match natural levels:
a) The road will be steeper at the bend which will be a safety concern and will not comply with road design requirements.
b) The possibility of flooding of lot 49 will be increased.
3. The City, through the approval of the subdivisional engineering plans, will request that landscaping is provided along the retaining wall on Hepburn Avenue road reserve boundary to complement and lessen the visual impact of this wall.
Case 2 - retaining wall height over 4m and up to 4.37m on the common boundary within the same subdivision area (refer Attachment 2):
Gallica Way and Supernova Rise heading north are sloping down at different grades due to the natural topography of the land and therefore would require retaining walls between the lots that are fronting those two roads.
Furthermore, the consulting engineer has provided the following justifications for approval of the retaining walls for cases 1 and 2:
"The site is bounded by Landsdale Road to the north, Hepburn Avenue to the south, Lot 146 Landsdale Road to the west and Lot 149 Landsdale Road to the east.
Existing height constraints imposed by current land topography and the fall of the land from the north/west to the south/east have combined to elevate some of the walls within the subdivision higher than the acceptable heights. This is required to ensure level building platforms for prospective purchasers and to provide essential services to the site (Attachment 3).
The ultimate levels are constrained by road designs that should follow the natural surface of adjoining undeveloped Lots 146 and 149 Landsdale Road. Altering the road levels would affect neighbouring lots and create significant difference in levels along the boundaries with these lots.
The roads have been designed with one way cross fall to mitigate the height difference and therefore retaining wall heights between lots."
Approval to construct retaining walls for cases 1 and 2 is now requested for Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale.
Consultation
For case 1, consultation with the owner of Lot 149 Landsdale is required for the proposal. The consultant has informed the City that a signed copy of the agreed proposal of the retaining wall from the adjacent lot owner is under process.
Comment
Land Development has assessed and supports this proposal due to the need to accommodate the established ground levels surrounding the subject development.
The benefit of the proposed design is that building pads presented for sale to prospective purchasers will not require further level alterations or another retaining wall associated with the proposed building structure.
It is therefore recommended that proposed retaining walls for the two cases be approved.
Statutory Compliance
A Building Licence is necessary for all retaining walls before construction can commence.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Policy Implications
Application for approval to construct retaining walls up to 4m in height abutting the road reserve and up to 4.37m in height on the common boundary of the subdivision, have been processed in accordance with Council’s Planning Policy (Policy No. 4.5).
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple
That Council AUTHORISES approval of the retaining walls proposed for Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489), up to a maximum 4m retained height abutting the road reserve and 4.37m retained height on the common boundary of the subdivision as per the application drawings, subject to a building licence being obtained before construction can commence.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Subdivisional Retaining Walls Over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489) Attachment 1 |
15/37628 |
|
|
2. |
Subdivisional Retaining Walls Over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489) Attachment 2 |
15/39930 |
|
|
3. |
Subdivisional Retaining Walls Over 4.0 Metres in Height - Lots 147 and 148 Landsdale Road, Landsdale (WAPC 149489) Attachment 3 |
15/40024 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 101
Development Applications
File Ref: DA2014/1966 – 15/19942
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a development application for a change of use from a Factory to Massage Premises for Unit 7, Lot 1 (15) Prindiville Drive, Wangara.
|
Applicant |
Yee Lau |
|
Owner |
Vata Investments Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Unit 7 / Lot 1 (15) Prindiville Drive, Wangara |
|
Site Area |
2849.9m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Service Industrial |
Background
On 20 October 2014, the City received an application for a change of use from a Factory to a proposed Massage Premises at the subject lot. Attachment 1 contains a location plan showing the subject property.
Detail
The applicant submitted a proposal describing the proposed use as a Remedial Massage Centre. For the purpose of this report, the description will be for a Massage Premises.
The proposal is for a Massage Premises which will offer neck, head, shoulder, and back therapy. There will be a limit of six masseuse practitioners, and operating hours will be from 9am to 9pm, with peak periods anticipated between 5pm and 9pm. The internal floor space of Unit 7 will be reconfigured to provide six consulting rooms, a reception, kitchen, storage area, and toilet facilities (Attachment 2 – Floor Plan).
Consultation
Consultation was undertaken by way of writing to adjoining landowners of the subject site. However, on the basis that the proposed use is not considered capable of being permitted or appropriate in a Service Industrial zone this advertising was not necessary or required. Notwithstanding this, at the conclusion of the comment period (21 days), two submissions were received, both objecting to the proposal. The main issues in the objections relate to the following:
· Parking and traffic access; and
· Suitability of the use in a Service Industrial zone.
These issues are addressed in the Comment section of this report.
Comment
Land Use
The City has previously considered applications for massage establishments under the land uses of Consulting Room or Medical Centre. District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2) defines a Consulting Room as a building used by not more than one health consultant at any one time for the investigation or treatment of human injuries or ailments and for general patient care.
A Medical Centre is defined as premises accommodating two or more consulting rooms. On 27 May 2010, the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) issued a decision in the matter of Tracey Pearce and the City of Wanneroo (WASAT 77) which addressed the issue of whether a message centre could be considered as a Consulting Room or Medical Centre. The SAT’s comments in respect of this issue are summarised below:
· A health consultant refers to a medical practitioner or other health care practitioner such as a nurse or physiotherapist which does not include a masseuse; and
· A massage centre is not specifically mentioned in Table 1 of DPS 2, and cannot be reasonably determined as falling within the interpretation of one of those categories and therefore is an unlisted use in accordance with Clause 3.3 of DPS 2.
Consistent with the decision made by the SAT, the proposal has been treated as an Unlisted Use in accordance with Clause 3.3 of DPS 2. Clause 3.3 of DPS 2 requires Council to consider whether the use is consistent or inconsistent with the objectives and purposes of the relevant zone, in order to determine whether the use can be considered in that particular zone. This is discussed further below.
Suitability of a Massage Premises within a Service Industrial Zone
Clause 3.12 relating to Service Industrial Zones includes the following provisions:
3.12.1 The Service Industrial Zone is intended to provide for a wide range of business, industrial and recreational developments which the Council may consider would be inappropriate in Commercial, Business and General Industrial Zones and which are capable of being conducted in a manner which will prevent them being obtrusive, or detrimental to the local amenity.
3.12.2 The objectives of the Service Industrial Zone are to:
(a) Accommodate a range of light industries, showrooms and warehouses, entertainment and recreational activities, and complementary business services which, by their nature, would not detrimentally affect the amenity of surrounding areas; and
(b) Ensure that development within this zone creates an attractive façade to the street for the visual amenity of surrounding areas.
In support of their proposal, the applicant is of the view that the proposed Massage Premises:
· Falls within the wide range of business, industrial, and recreational developments intended for a Service Industrial Zone;
· Is not detrimental to the amenity of surrounding areas; and
· Does not meet the objectives of the Business or Commercial Zones.
Administration does not agree that the use can be considered to fall within the wide range of business, industrial, and recreational developments referred to in Clause 3.12 of DPS 2. This is because the land uses which are capable of approval in the Service Industrial zone do not include any uses which relate to the provision of personal therapeutic treatments.
The land uses that are listed in Table 1 of DPS 2 which provide any form of personal treatment to people (such as a Beauty Parlour, Consulting Room, Hairdresser, Hospital, Medical Centre and Nursing Home) are all not permitted (‘X’) uses in the Service Industrial zone, however all of these uses are capable of approval within the Business or Commercial zones (either ‘P’ or ‘D’ uses).
If Council’s intention was to permit uses that provide personal treatment services in the Service Industrial zone, land uses such as a Beauty Parlour, Consulting Room, Hairdresser, Medical Centre and Nursing Home would be capable of approval under DPS 2.
Administration does not consider the proposed Massage Premises satisfies the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone for the following reasons:
· All land uses within Table 1 of DPS 2 which provide a form of personal treatment to people are not permitted within the Service Industrial zone; and
· The proposed Massage Premises is considered an appropriate use in the Commercial and Business zones. This is because all uses which offer a personal treatment service that are listed in Table 1 of DPS 2 are capable of approval in the Commercial and Business zones.
Therefore, in accordance with Clause 3.3 (c) of DPS 2, the proposed Massage Premises is considered inconsistent with the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone and is therefore not permitted.
Parking
Sub-clause 4.14.1 of DPS 2 states that where development is not specified in Table 2 – Car Parking Standards, Council shall determine the parking standard. There are a total of 31 parking bays on Lot 1 (15) Prindiville Drive. The initial approval for the factory units was granted in 1980 and was subject to parking requirements in accordance with Town Planning Scheme 1 (TPS 1) which required 7 parking bays for Unit 7.
Based on six masseuse practitioners, receptionist, and presumably the same number of customers as the number of practitioners on site, the proposed Massage Premises may require 13 parking bays at any one time.
The applicant has advised that peak demand for use of parking bays will be from 5pm to 9pm for the Massage Premises. Therefore, due to other land uses at 15 Prindiville Drive, Wangara being primarily accessed during daytime, the peak demand for car parking (13 bays) for the proposed Massage Premises could be accommodated as it will be outside the peak demand for other uses on site. This justification is plausible, however, if Council is inclined to approve the application a condition restricting a maximum number of 6 customers permitted to be on-site at any one time should be imposed to minimise the demand for on-site parking during the daytime.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council REFUSES the application submitted by Yee Lau in accordance with the provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2, for a Change of Use from a Factory to an Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) at Unit 7, Lot 1 (15) Prindiville Drive, Wangara for the following reason: -
a) The proposed Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) is not consistent with the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone stated in Clause 3.12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, and therefore not permitted in accordance with Clause 3.3 (a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Proposed Change of Use - Use Not listed for a Massage Premises: Unit 7, Lot 1, 15 Prindiville Drive, Wangara |
15/40391 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - Proposed Change of Use - Use Not Listed for a Massage Premises: Unit 7, Lot 1, 15 Prindiville Drive, Wangara |
15/40401 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 107
File Ref: DA2014/2191 – 14/372133
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider an application for planning approval for a change of use to an Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) at Unit 2, 10 O’Connor Way, Wangara.
|
Applicant |
Smile Massage |
|
Owner |
Mrs Assunta Abbonizio |
|
Location |
Unit 2, Lot 1 (10) O’Connor Way, Wangara |
|
Site Area |
2001m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Service Industrial |
Background
On 11 January 1988, the City granted development approval for eight (8) Showroom/Warehouse units at 10 O’Connor Way, Wangara. Since this date, the City has granted further planning approvals for individual units on the subject lot, however, no further planning approvals have been issued for Unit 2.
On 14 November 2014, Smile Massage submitted an application for a change of use to an Unlisted Use (Massage Parlour) at Unit 2, 10 O’Connor Way, Wangara to the City (DA2014/2191). For the purposes of consistency in this report the development will be referred to as Massage Premises. A locality plan for the subject site is shown in Attachment 1.
Detail
The applicant proposes to operate Massage Premises from the subject premises. The Massage Premises is proposed to operate 7 days per week, from 9am to 9.30pm and will employ between 2 to 3 staff at any one time.
The following treatments will be provided and tailored specifically to suit individual customer requirements:
· Remedial massage for head, neck, shoulders, arms, legs and back;
· Pressure point treatment;
· Relaxation treatments;
· Deep tissue treatments; and
· Soft tissue treatments.
The applicant has advised that treatments will be provided on a primarily appointment only basis, however, walk-in appointments will be catered for when staff are available.
A floor plan outlining the layout for the proposed Massage Premises is provided as Attachment 2.
Consultation
The application was not advertised for public comment. Clause 3.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) states that an Unlisted Use is only required to be advertised where it is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the zone in which it is proposed. Administration is of the view the proposed Massage Premises is inconsistent with the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone and therefore public consultation is not required.
Comment
Land Use
The City has previously considered applications for massage establishments under the land uses of Consulting Room or Medical Centre. DPS 2 defines a Consulting Room as a building used by not more than one health consultant at any one time for the investigation or treatment of human injuries or ailments and for general patient care. A Medical Centre is defined as premises accommodating two or more consulting rooms. On 27 May 2010, the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) issued a decision in the matter of Tracey Pearce and the City of Wanneroo (WASAT 77) which addressed the issue of whether a message centre could be considered as a Consulting Room or Medical Centre. The SAT’s comments in respect of this issue are summarised below:
· A health consultant refers to a medical practitioner or other health care practitioner such as a nurse or physiotherapist which does not include a masseuse; and
· A massage centre is not specifically mentioned in Table 1 of DPS 2 and cannot be reasonably determined as falling within the interpretation of one of those categories and therefore is an unlisted use in accordance with Clause 3.3 of DPS 2.
Consistent with the decision made by the SAT, the proposal has been treated as an Unlisted Use in accordance with Part 3.3 of DPS 2. Part 3.3 of DPS 2 requires Council to consider whether the use is consistent or inconsistent with the objectives and purposes of the relevant zone, in order to determine whether the use can be considered in that particular zone. This is discussed further below.
Suitability of Massage Premises within a Service Industrial zone
The subject land is zoned Service Industrial under DPS 2. Clause 3.12 of DPS 2 states the following in relation to the Service Industrial zone:
3.12.1 The Service Industrial Zone is intended to provide for a wide range of business, industrial and recreational developments which the Council may consider would be inappropriate in Commercial, Business and General Industrial Zones and which are capable of being conducted in a manner which will prevent them from being obtrusive, or detrimental to the local amenity.
3.12.2 The objectives of the Service Industrial Zone are to:
(a) Accommodate a range of light industrials, showrooms and warehouses, entertainment and recreational activities, and complementary business services, which, by their nature, would not detrimentally affect the amenity of surrounding areas;
(b) Ensure that the development within this zone creates an attractive façade to the street for the visual amenity of surrounding areas.
The applicant is of the view that the proposed Massage Premises can be considered as a complementary business service as outlined in sub-clause 3.12.2(a) of DPS 2 and therefore is consistent with the objectives of the zone. Additionally, the applicant has submitted that the proposed land use will create a visually attractive façade that enhances the surrounding area and the street.
Administration does not agree that the use can be considered as a complementary business service. This is because the land uses which are capable of approval in the Service Industrial zone do not include any uses which relate to the provision of personal therapeutic treatments.
Administration does not consider the proposed Massage Premises satisfies the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone. The land uses that are listed in Table 1 of DPS 2 which provide any form of personal treatment service to people (such as a Beauty Parlour, Consulting Room, Hairdresser, Hospital, Medical Centre and Nursing Home) are all not permitted ('X') uses in the Service Industrial zone, however, all of these uses are capable of approval within the Business or Commercial zone (either 'P' or 'D' uses).
Therefore, in accordance with Clause 3.3 (c) of DPS 2, the proposed Massage Premises is considered inconsistent with the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone and is therefore not permitted.
Parking
Sub-clause 4.14.1 of DPS 2 states that where development is not specified in Table 2 – Car Parking Standards, Council shall determine the parking standard. There are a total of 33 parking bays on the subject lot. The original planning approval was granted in 1988 and therefore was subject to the parking requirements outlined under Town Planning Scheme No. 1, which required a total of 4 bays for Unit 2. The proponent has advised that there will be between 2 – 3 staff working at any one time, which could potentially see between 2 – 3 clients receiving treatments at the same time. Therefore, the proposed Massage Premises may require between 4 - 6 parking bays at any one time. This does not take into account clients who may arrive early for their appointment and require on-site parking.
The applicant has advised that they expect client appointments to be “slow at first” and generally daytime appointments to be limited with the peak demand for services to be in the evenings. Therefore, due to other land uses within 10 O’Connor Way being primarily accessed during daytime, the peak demand for car parking for the proposed Massage Premises could be accommodated as it will be outside the peak demand for other uses on site. This justification is plausible, however, should Council be inclined to approve the application a condition restricting a maximum of 4 persons to be permitted on-site at any one time during the daytime should be imposed to minimise the demand for on-site parking.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council REFUSES the application submitted by Smile Massage in accordance with Clause 6.9.1 (a) of District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a change of use to an Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) at Unit 2, 10 O’Connor Way, Wangara for the following reason:-
a) The proposed Unlisted Use (Massage Premises) is not consistent with the objectives and purposes of the Service Industrial zone stated in Clause 3.12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 and therefore is not permitted in accordance with Clause 3.3 (c) of District Planning Scheme No. 2.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1: Location Plan |
15/34421 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 Floor Plan |
15/33546 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 113
3.8 Reconsideration of Proposed Liquor Store and Shopping Centre Extension at 6 Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler
File Ref: DA2014/1218 – 15/18078
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To reconsider a development application for a proposed liquor store (Liquorland) and an extension to the existing supermarket (Coles) at Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler in response to an invitation made by the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT).
|
Applicant |
TPG Town Planning, Urban Design & Heritage (TPG) |
|
Owner |
Coles Group Property Developments & ISPT Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard Butler |
|
Site Area |
12,190m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
|
ASP 38 Zoning |
Commercial |
Background
The subject site is located at the corner of Kingsbridge Boulevard and Marmion Avenue, and is bound by Aberdar Lane to the south and east. Attachment 1 contains a location plan of the subject site. On 8 July, 2014 the City received an application (DA2014/1218) for a liquor store and an extension to an existing supermarket at Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler.
Council's Previous Decision
Council at its 9 December 2014 Council Meeting (PS03-12/14) considered the development application. Attachment 2 contains plans that were considered at the meeting. Council resolved the following:
"That Council:-
1. DECIDES that it is not prepared to approve the application submitted by TPG Town Planning and Urban Design and Heritage on behalf of the landowners for a Liquor Store and Supermarket extension at Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler, in the format submitted; and
2. ADVISES the applicant that Council will give further consideration to this proposal upon submission of a redesign of the application which complies with main street design principles outlined in the WA Planning Commission Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy to encourage maximised pedestrian activation of the existing main street, and, as part of this process the likely foot traffic in and around the centre be objectively modelled to ensure maximised activation of Kingsbridge Boulevard."
SAT Proceedings
Following Council's decision on 9 December 2014, the applicant exercised their rights to seek a review of Council's decision at the SAT. The applicant submitted an application for review to SAT on 17 December 2014 and the matter was subsequently scheduled for a Mediation session on 14 January 2015.
At Mediation, the following was included as part of the SAT orders:
1. The applicant is to submit the final additional information on or before 29 January 2015 to the respondent regarding the proposal.
2. Pursuant to Section 31 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 Council is invited to reconsider its decision at the Council Meeting on 3 March 2015.
Detail
The applicant provided a submission on the 30 January 2015. As part of this submission, the following documents were provided:
- Amended plans for reconsideration (Attachments 3 and 4);
- A supporting report provided by TPG Town Planning for the amended proposal which also commented on other design options (Attachment 5); and
- A report prepared by an Urban Designer (Malcolm Mackay) discussing the main street design principles and pedestrian modelling (Attachment 6).
Amended Plans for Reconsideration
The amended plans propose to extend the existing supermarket entrance forward towards Kingsbridge Boulevard, in line with the proposed liquor store. The location and size of the liquor store is retained, however the front facade has been slightly modified creating a continuous facade with the supermarket entrance.
TPG Report
The report submitted by TPG comments on the amended plans and two alternative design options, and explains why these alternative design options have been discounted by the applicant. The alternative designs are as follows:
· Retaining the supermarket entrance in the current location along Kingsbridge Boulevard and relocating the liquor store to the western side of the entrance;
· Relocating the liquor store to the rear of the supermarket, adjacent to the car park and relocating the supermarket entrance to the west along Kingsbridge Boulevard, in accordance with the original plans considered by Council.
The report also discusses limitations of the site which influenced the amended plans and how the proposed amended plans address the Council Resolution.
Malcolm Mackay Report
Malcolm Mackay prepared a report which comments on the following:
· How the existing Centre functions and how this will be altered as a result of the amended plans;
· How the amended plans achieves Main Street Design Principles;
· How the amended plans meets certain principles of Element 7 (Activity Centres) of Liveable Neighbourhoods; and
· A section 'Impacts on the main street' discusses changes to foot traffic to the main street that may result from the amended plans.
The report concludes that the amended plans are an acceptable design that will likely contribute to greater patronage of the main street.
Consultation
Public consultation of the amended plans was not undertaken as the amended plans do not deviate significantly from the original plans that were previously considered by Council.
Comment
As part of Council's resolution, Council requested a redesign of the application that achieves the following requirements. These requirements and Administration's assessment of the extent to which these requirements have been met are detailed as follows:
1. Redesign of the application which complies with main street design principles outlined in the WA Planning Commission Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy to encourage maximised pedestrian activation of the existing main street.
As part of the report provided by TPG, other design options were considered by the applicant. Some aspects of these alternative designs satisfy main street design principles of Liveable Neighbourhoods. However neither of these alternative designs were submitted as the final design and therefore were not assessed in detail by Administration.
In response to this aspect of the Council Resolution, the applicant amended the plan by slightly modifying the facade of the liquor store and reducing the setback of the supermarket entrance to 2 metres from Kingsbridge Boulevard. The supermarket entrance is now in line with the proposed front facade of the liquor store creating a continuous facade with the other tenancies along Kingsbridge Boulevard. This setback now complies with the main street precinct provisions of Agreed Structure Plan No. 38 – Brighton Village Centre (ASP 38).
Notwithstanding the above, the amended plans do not change the design to an extent where it can be reasonably argued to be considered a redesign. Although the supermarket entrance setback has been reduced, the location and orientation of the supermarket entrance and liquor store remains in the same general location as the original plans considered by Council.
As the amended plans do not constitute a redesign, it can also be reasonably argued that the amended plans do not address the main street design principles of Liveable Neighbourhoods.
2. Foot traffic in and around the centre be objectively modelled to ensure maximised activation of Kingsbridge Boulevard.
As part of Council's resolution the applicant was requested to objectively model the foot traffic along Kingsbridge Boulevard. Administration is not aware of any guidelines or standards to model foot traffic.
The report submitted by Malcolm Mackay included a section 'Impacts on the main street' that discusses potential increase in foot traffic along the main street. In this section, Malcolm Mackay stated that the proposed plan will likely result in a 'sizeable increase' in foot traffic along the main street. The report concluded that the additional pedestrian movements in the main street are estimated to increase between 30% and 60% due to the following:
- An increase in general patronage arising from an expanded supermarket with a wider product range being a greater attraction to the centre as a whole.
- Patronage generated by the new liquor store.
- All patronage of the newsagent (existing tenancy 11), which in the amended plan can only be accessed directly from the main street.
Malcolm Mackay indicated that the patterns of pedestrian movement will not change but the volume of foot traffic is expected to increase.
The 30% - 60% increase of pedestrian movement along the main street is an estimation by Malcolm Mackay and is not based on a pedestrian count or a survey of pedestrian movement. The provided information does not compare foot traffic between the amended plans and other alternative design options. As such, it is unclear if the amended plans would activate the main street to a greater or lesser extent than other potential designs, including the design previously considered by Council.
Conclusion
The Orders prepared by the SAT invite Council to review its previous decision. Under Section 31 (2) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, and in response to the invitation of the SAT, Council may do one of the following further to a previous decision:
a) affirm the decision; or
b) vary the decision; or
c) set aside the decision and substitute its new decision.
The amended plans have not been modified to an extent that achieves the following:
a) To be considered a redesign of the original application;
b) Satisfies the main street design principles of Liveable Neighbourhoods; and
c) Objectively models foot traffic.
Administration therefore recommends that Council affirms its previous decision made at its 9 December 2014 Council Meeting (PS03-12/14).
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and ASP 38. The application complies with all of the statutory planning requirements of these documents, with the exception of a car parking variation to DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Costs associated with responding to the application for review lodged with the SAT.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council, pursuant to Section 31 (2)(a) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, AFFIRMS its decision made at its Meeting of 9 December 2014 (PS03-12/14), which is included as follows:
“1. DECIDES that it is not prepared to approve the application submitted by TPG Town Planning and Urban Design and Heritage on behalf of the landowners for a Liquor Store and Supermarket extension at Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler, in the format submitted;
2. ADVISES the applicant that Council will give further consideration to this proposal upon submission of a redesign of the application which complies with main street design principles outlined in the WA Planning Commission Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy to encourage maximised pedestrian activation of the existing main street, and, as part of this process the likely foot traffic in and around the centre be objectively modelled to ensure maximised activation of Kingsbridge Boulevard; and
3. ADVISES the State Administrative Tribunal and the submitters of its decision.”
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 |
14/313229 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 |
14/313246 |
|
|
3. |
Attachment 3 |
15/29964 |
|
|
4. |
Attachment 4 |
15/29965 |
|
|
5. |
Attachment 5 |
15/30531 |
|
|
6. |
Attachment 6 |
15/30509 |
|
Liquor store and Supermarket extension at Lot 278 (6) Kingsbridge Boulevard, Butler
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to provide comment in relation to the resolution of the City of Wanneroo Council not to support a development application for an extension to the Kingsbridge Boulevard neighbourhood centre in Butler (Brighton) in order to accommodate an expansion of the existing Coles supermarket and an associated liquor store, and to defer its decision until further supporting advice was provided.
The resolution stated: “Council will give further consideration to this proposal upon submission of a redesign of the application which complies with main street design principles outlined in the WA Planning Commission Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy to encourage maximised pedestrian activation of the existing main street, and, as part of this process the likely foot traffic in and around the centre be objectively modelled to ensure maximised activation of Kingsbridge Boulevard”.
On behalf of the applicant, The Planning Group (WA) has requested that I provide expert comment on the proposal and the issues raised by the Council.
I have extensive experience in the design of retail environments dating back to retail planning and design undertaken in the UK in the early 1990’s. I have been involved in the planning and design of many retail and activity centres in WA, and was one of the original protagonists for the transition of the retail planning industry to adopt ‘main street’ principles.
Some of the activity centres that I have been involved with, that already have or propose a ‘main street’ component include:
· Claremont regional centre (completed)
· The Mezz, Mount Hawthorn (completed)
· Armadale regional centre (partly completed)
· Garden City regional centre structure plan (development pending)
· Karrinyup regional centre structure plan (in planning)
· Stirling regional centre (in planning)
· Dalyellup district centre (in planning)
· Brighton district centre (original concept plan)
· Banksia Grove district centre (original concept plan)
· Byford Glades neighbourhood centre (development pending)
· Golden Bay neighbourhood centre (in planning)
· Baldivis north neighbourhood centre (in planning)
Additionally I prepared, in conjunction with CLE Planning, the original concept design for the Kingsbridge Boulevard centre in Butler and promoted the centre as a ‘main street’ opportunity to both the land developer (Satterley) and the City of Wanneroo.
Existing condition
The current design successfully addresses the common problem of how to simultaneously utilise a major retail anchor, such as a supermarket, to activate a main street and enable convenient access between the anchor and the associated car park, without the anchor turning its back on either the main street or the car park.
The design for the Kingsbridge Boulevard model achieved this dual purpose function by turning the supermarket at 90-degrees to the main street and the car park, so that supermarket customers could easily exit to the main street to undertake other retail purchases or return to the car park with a laden trolley.
The location and orientation of the supermarket in this case was particularly successful for two reasons:
Firstly, the location of the supermarket entry to the main street was at the far western end of Kingsbridge Boulevard, which served to ‘charge’ the end of the street. Commonly, the greater intensity of pedestrian movement is in the centre of any given main street, with activity diminishing at the ends, so the location of a major retailer at the end of a street acts to rebalance the street and spreads the pedestrian traffic further along the street.
In the case of the Kingsbridge Boulevard centre, the Coles supermarket creates a major pedestrian destination at the far western end of the street in a similar way that a conventional shopping centre mall has an anchor tenant at each end of the main mall.
At the eastern end of the centre, the main street is ‘charged’ by both the Tavern and the row of shops to the rear of Coles that leads pedestrians from the main car park to the street.
An additional pedestrian charge point to the main street occurs midway along the street where a ‘walk-through’ provides direct access to the main street from the northern car park. In short, the main street is well balanced.
The only failing of the current situation is in relation to the newsagent at the western end of the centre adjacent to Coles. Originally, all specialty tenancies were supposed to trade to the street, specifically to support the main street environment. However, the newsagent has at some point reorientated itself, contrary to the original design intent, to trade to the northern air lock between Coles and the main street – creating the type of mall condition that the original design was trying to avoid.
The problem in this case is that by implying a conventional shopping mall condition (albeit with one tenancy), the condition suggests a centre with a hierarchy of mall space over street space rather than a centre with a ‘level playing field’ for all tenants. From a practical perspective, the trading of the newsagent to the airlock runs the risk that Coles customers may go to the newsagents directly and solely, rather than being either enticed/forced out into the street where they have exposure to all of the other tenants.
The second major benefit of the current condition is that the location and orientation of the Coles supermarket to Marmion Avenue creates a strong presence and branding of the centre to regional traffic. Whilst obviously beneficial to Coles, the exposure is also highly beneficial to the other traders who are somewhat dependant on the success of Coles as a drawcard to the centre.
Comment on the proposed plan
The proposed plan provides for the logical expansion of the Cole supermarket. The supermarket cannot be extended to the north or east because of the existing tenancies. Expansion to the south would result in a loss of car parking, so the only logical expansion of the supermarket is to the west.
The expansion plan still retains a pedestrian outlet to the main street, albeit further to the west, with an additional tenancy added in order to ‘stretch’ the main street to the Coles entry. In short, the expansion maintains the current and entirely appropriate relationship between the supermarket and the street, with the additional benefit of an additional tenancy on the main street and another reason to go to the centre and walk down the street. In this respect, it should also be noted that the proposed liquor store does not have any new car parking immediate adjacent or a drive-through so patrons will be pedestrian. This means that they will be making a contribution to street activity. Furthermore, the current plans show the liquor store trading to the street rather than the Coles airlock, which avoids the current unsatisfactory condition of the newsagent.
The proposed plan also serves to correct the current condition of the newsagent, as it requires the newsagent to trade to the street, as was the original intent.
The proposed plan retains the successful relationship between the Coles supermarket and Marmion Avenue. Additionally, the extra retail floorspace serves to support and increase patronage of the centre as a whole, which will translate into improved patronage of the main street given the new tenancy will trade to the street and the that the fundamental relationship between Coles and the main street will not change.
Consistency with main street design principles
The fundamental principles of main street design are to encourage pedestrian movement on the main streets and make the pedestrian experience as pleasant and interesting as possible. In this respect, the proposed plan:
· Ensures that all tenancies, including Coles, have an entrance from the main street.
· Increases the extent of retail frontage to the main street.
· Increases the number and diversity of tenants trading the street.
· Provides extended shade and shelter to pedestrians through extension of the canopy cover.
· Maintains unrestricted and multiple access pedestrian routes to the main street from the southern car park.
· Locates entry points to anchor tenancies where they encourage greater pedestrian movement and walk ‘wallets past windows’.
· Avoids the need to drive laden shopping trolleys along a public street.
Consistency with Liveable Neighbourhoods
The request by Council for demonstration of consistency with Liveable Neighbourhoods is unusual. Element 7 of Liveable Neighbourhoods provides extensive guidance on the planning of activity centres of a range of different types and sizes. However, much of Element 7 focuses on the macro planning issues that govern the location of centres within the urban environment and the overall planning of activity centres and the general disposition of streets, land uses, built form, and open space. There is very little guidance on the detailed design of buildings. The relevant Objectives and Requirements of Liveable Neighbourhoods to the issue at hand include:
O3 To facilitate activity centres that are structured as mixed-use centres in a predominantly ‘main street’ based format, and are detailed to provide a high quality public realm supportive of public transport, walking and cycling in addition to good car and service vehicle access.
Response: The existing Kingsbridge Boulevard centre is a ‘main street’ based format that supports walking (and other modes), and the proposed plan maintains the status quo in this respect.
R13 Where large neighbourhood centres are proposed, they should be in a ‘main street’ layout with on-street parking, additional parking at the rear of buildings, and built frontage to secondary streets (figure 68).
Response: The existing Kingsbridge Boulevard centre is a ‘main street’ layout that provides with on-street parking, additional parking at the rear of buildings, and built frontage to secondary street, and the proposed plan doesn’t change that. Whilst Liveable Neighbourhoods provides a suggestion on how a large neighbourhood centre might be designed in Figure 68, it is only an example and not a template. In fact, it is arguably erroneous in that it fails to charge the ends of the main street and requires the use of supermarket trolleys in the street. The relevant principles that can be drawn from figure 68 are that:
· The supermarket has an entry to the street
· Tenancies should trade to the street rather than to a mall
· There is the capacity for unrestricted pedestrian access from the car parks to the main street.
In the case of the proposed plan, all of the above principles are satisfied.
R36 Centres should comprise a network of streets that encourage pedestrian activity, facilitate crossing of busy arterials, enable ease of local vehicle movement, provide extensive frontage for development, and define blocks that can accommodate mixed-use development and off- street parking.
Response: Whilst the proposed plan shifts the Coles supermarket entrance further to the west, the proposed plan does not alter the configuration of the existing centre’s structure in relation to pedestrian movement. In fact, the proposed plan creates a more extensive development frontage to the main street through the addition of an extra tenancy.
R51 The detailed layout and design of centres should ensure that a safe, well-defined public realm will be produced.
Response: The inclusion of additional frontage to the main street through the addition of an extra tenancy assists in better definition of the street and additional opportunities for passive surveillance of the street from traders and customers.
R55 Centres should be detailed to create a high quality street environment with shade, shelter, trees, pavement treatment, street furniture, landscaping, and urban art.
Response: The proposed plan increases the current extent of pedestrian shelter by extending the main street frontage and the associated canopy cover.
Impact on the main street
The proposed plan is likely to result in an increase in foot traffic in the main street. Whilst the pattern of movement along the main street will remain much the same, other than being extended slightly further west, the volume of foot traffic is expected to increase by a reasonable amount. The increase in foot traffic stems from:
· An increase in general patronage arising from an expanded Coles with a wider product range being a greater attraction to the centre as a whole. Whilst not all future Coles customers may visit the main street tenancies, those that do are likely to be of an equivalent proportion to the present costumers who extend their visit to the main street.
· Most of the patronage generated by the new liquor store. It should be noted that the entry to the liquor store addresses the street; as such, all liquor store customers will contribute to the main street foot traffic.
· All patronage of the newsagent, which in the new plan is accessed solely from the main street (as originally intended).
Given the above generators of additional foot traffic in the main street, and given the significance of both the liquor store and the newsagent as attractors in comparison with the other main street tenants, it would be reasonable to estimate the additional pedestrian movements in the street to be somewhere between 30% and 60% more than the present pedestrian movements.
Summary and conclusion
In summary, the proposed plan to expand the existing Coles supermarket, move the entry point to the main street further west, and incorporate an additional tenancy to the main street (a liquor store) is a logical design response to the site.
The proposed plan is consistent with widely acknowledged main street principles, including those touched upon in Element 7 of Liveable Neighbourhoods.
The proposed plan does not alter the fundamental structure of the centre, and maintains the original ‘main street’ design intent. Indeed, given that the plan requires the existing newsagent to readdress the main street, the proposed plan is more aligned with the original ‘main street’ design intent than the current situation.
The proposed plan is likely to lead to an increase in pedestrian traffic in the main street and patronage of the main street tenancies arising from Coles being a stronger drawcard, the addition of a liquor store trading to the street, reorientation of the newsagent to trade to the street along with the other specialty tenants, and supported by the retention of an entry to the Coles supermarket at the western end of the main street.
In conclusion, in my opinion as an urban designer with over 25 years of experience in retail planning and design, particularly in respect to main street design, I believe the proposed plan is an acceptable outcome for the expansion of the centre and is likely to contribute to greater patronage of the main street.
Malcolm Mackay
Director - Mackay Urbandesign
3 February 2015
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 137
City Businesses
File Ref: 10540 – 14/290227
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the proposal to construct and operate energy generation facilities on portion of City owned land at Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup.
Background
In June 2012, the City was approached by Wanneroo Solar Park Pty Ltd (formerly Pinjar Power Pty Ltd) with a concept to construct and operate a solar powered energy generation facility on land owned or managed by the City under a lease arrangement in the vicinity of the Neerabup Industrial Area and the Western Power Neerabup Terminal Substation. The proposed solar facility capable of generating 10 megawatts(MW).
Following investigations by Administration and Wanneroo Solar Park Pty Ltd, Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup (Lot 600) was identified as a potential site of interest. The site is located at the north east corner of the Neerabup Industrial Area (attachment 1 refers).
The City of Wanneroo owns in freehold Lot 600 since October 1976. The land comprises an area of 47.3280ha and is reserved for "Public Purposes (Special Uses)" and "Parks and Recreation" within both the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and the City's District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS2).
Of the total land area of Lot 600, approximately 10.3ha is included in the agreed structure plan for the Neerabup Industrial Area (ASP17), a further 7.6ha is currently leased to the Tiger Kart Club Inc and Bush Forever sites 382 and 428 account for approximately 3.2ha of the site. The remaining area of Lot 600 that is unaffected by these factors is approximately 26ha and formed the basis of initial discussions (attachment 2 refers).
Lot 600 is also incorporated in the Neerabup Energy Precinct as outlined in the "Neerabup Energy Precinct Management Plan", which was jointly prepared by Landcorp and consulting agencies on behalf of the City in 2010. The energy precinct designation is reflected in the "Public Purposes (Special Uses)" reservation of the majority of Lot 600 under the MRS.
Detail
A report was presented to Council Forum at its meeting 18 February 2014 outlining the proposal by Wanneroo Solar Park Pty Ltd. Feedback received from Council Forum indicated a strong desire to promote green energy generation within the City of Wanneroo, but also to maximise the potential return from Lot 600 for energy production more generally. Accordingly, it was noted that Administration should defer further action on any lease proposal with Wanneroo Solar Park Pty Ltd, pending an expression of interest process for the purchase or lease of portion or all of the abovementioned 26ha of Lot 600 for the purposes of energy production generally (i.e. not restricted to 'green' energy).
Administration subsequently advertised an Expression of Interest (EOI) for "The Proposed Use of Portion of Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup for an Energy Generation Facility" in June 2014. The EOI sought submissions from suitably experienced and resourced parties for the development and operation of an energy generation facility and was advertised as a potential two stage process. The EOI was open to proposals from both renewable and non-renewable forms of energy generation. Stage 1 sought general expressions of interest, with Stage 2 providing the City with the option to invite suitable applicants to submit further detailed formal proposals focusing on purchase/lease, development and operational processes.
The City received five (5) submissions resulting from the EOI for "The Proposed Use of Portion of Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup for an Energy Generation Facility". Two submissions were for Solar Powered and three for "Waste to Energy" (WtE) based energy generation facilities, indicating that there is interest in the site from a variety of energy providers. The five submissions were outlined in a report to Council Forum at its meeting held on 29 July 2014.
Consultation
Administration sought advice and comment from the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC) due to its recent experience in energy generation facilities. EMRC advised that in the event that the City were to consider the notion of energy generation, the installation of a "solar farm" would be considered more acceptable to the broader community and also provide the opportunity to showcase large-scale alternative energy generation technologies within the City of Wanneroo.
Comment
The initial EOI sought only high level general interest for the construction and operation of an energy generation facility on Lot 600. The invitation was open to proposals from both renewable and non-renewable forms of energy production.
Following the significant interest in the development of Lot 600 the City has been provided an opportunity to achieve significant financial, social and environmental benefits. All proposals have the potential to achieve these goals, however it needs to be determined which option(s) will provide the best outcomes for the City and the community.
Administration is supportive of the notion of energy generation facilities operating on City owned land in the designated Neerabup Energy Precinct, as it has the capacity to provide an ongoing financial return to the City for land that may otherwise remain unoccupied and undeveloped for the foreseeable future.
The current situation presents several options for consideration for the future development of energy generation facilities on Lot 600:
· Defer (or decline) all progress on the development of energy generation facilities on Lot 600 and take no further action;
· Proceed with the EOI Stage 2 pursuant to the advertised EOI in June 2014, whereby suitable applicants are invited to submit further detailed proposals focusing on
- energy generation process;
- construction and operation;
- land requirements; and
- disposal method of the available area of Lot 600 (lease or purchase).; or
· Commence a new EOI/Tender process exclusively for Solar Power based proposals for the development of portion of Lot 600.
In the event that the Solar Powered option is preferred, Administration considers that a revised EOI or tender processes should be re-advertised and not limited to the two parties who submitted for the original EOI.
It should be noted that within the current and any future EOI the City will only be supplying the use of City owned land in the form of a ground lease to the successful applicant(s) with the applicant(s) responsible for construction and operation of the proposed facility. Administration considers this approach will minimise the City's exposure to risk.
Statutory Compliance
Any potential sale or lease of portion of Lot 600 could constitute a disposition of land under Sections 3.57, 3.58 and 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995.
Any lease term in excess of 20 years (including options to extend or renew) will require the approval of the WAPC in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
If supported, any lease negotiations will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Tenancy Policy.
Financial Implications
The EOI Stage 1 process did not request financial details or preferred options for lease or purchase of portion of Lot 600. It was simply to gauge market interest in the use of this site by energy generation providers. Financial detail was intended to form part of formal Stage 2 submissions, should the City choose to proceed with this project.
The proposal as it stands is for the City to provide the land (as a ground lease) and the proponents to be responsible for construction and operation of the energy generation facilities.
Administration previously engaged McGees Property Valuers to provide a ground lease valuation for the proposed leasable area of Lot 600 specifically as a "solar based energy generation facility". The valuation concluded that a lease of the available 26 ha portion of Lot 600 would yield $6,000 per ha per annum, equating to $156,000 per annum.
Should a WtE proposal be considered in the future, a further ground lease valuation will be required for land area to be used. It would be anticipated that the hectare rate per annum would be higher given the intensive nature of a WtE facility.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES Lot 600 Wattle Avenue, Neerabup forms part of the Neerabup Energy Precinct as outlined in the "Neerabup Energy Precinct Management Plan 2010", to facilitate the construction and operation of renewable and non-renewable forms of energy generation facilities;
2. NOTES the public advertising of the Expression of Interest for "The Proposed Use of Portion of Lot 600 (570) Wattle Avenue, Neerabup for an Energy Generation Facility" resulted in five formal submissions being received and defined by two categories:
a) Solar Power based energy generation; and
b) Waste to Energy based energy generation.;
3. SUPPORTS in principle the proposal to Lease portion of Lot 600 Wattle Avenue, Neerabup as identified in the body of this report for the construction and operation of Solar Power Based Energy Generation Facility;
4. AUTHORISES the advertising of a Expression of Interest/Tender for the proposed Lease and Agreement for Lease for the Construction and Operation of a Solar Power Based Energy Generation Facility within Lot 600 Wattle Avenue, Neerabup up to an area of approximately 26 hectares as outlined in the body of this report in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995; and
5. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council relating to submissions following the advertising of an Expression of Interest/Tender in 4 above.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Lot 600 Wattle Avenue Neerabup Energy Generation Facility Location Plan |
14/293183 |
|
|
2. |
Energy Generation Facility - Lot 600 Wattle Ave - Attachment 2 |
15/47254 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 143
3.10 Proposed Excision of Portion of the Wanneroo Civic Centre Site to create a Commercial Development Site.
File Ref: 7819 – 14/247033
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the excision of a portion of the Wanneroo Civic Centre site to create a commercial site for future disposal.
Background
Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo is owned freehold by the City under Certificate of Title Volume: 2831 Folio: 990. The site comprises 2ha in area, is zoned "Centre" within District Planning No.2 (DPS 2) and is the site of the Wanneroo Civic Centre (WCC).
A report was presented to Council at its meeting on 4 March 2014 (IN02-03/14) to consider the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Project. Within the report it was considered that "Although City owned land exists on the Dundebar Road frontage adjacent to the existing Civic Centre, investigations have identified the opportunity to build over the drainage sump at the corner of Servite Terrace and Cafaggio Crescent. Use of this site on the north-west corner of the City's freehold Civic Centre site (Lot 505, Diagram 98944) will enable future commercial development opposite the ECU Health Centre with financial returns to fund future assets." Furthermore "Redevelopment of the Civic Centre in the manner proposed will avoid the need to extend the existing building eastwards along the Dundebar Road frontage, thus making available the currently vacant 1,600m2 south-eastern corner of the Civic Centre site located at the intersection of Dundebar Road and Scenario Drive. This portion of land could be excised from the Civic Centre site and sold or leased as a commercial property, with the proceeds potentially used to offset the cost of the Civic Centre redevelopment."
Subsequently it was resolved in part that Council:-
"1. ENDORSES the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Concept Plan, City of Wanneroo Drawing No 2836-1-0, on the basis that the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension straddles Lot 505 and Reserve 46538 and as detailed in Attachment 1;
3. APPROVES the purchase of Reserve 46538, Servite Terrace, Wanneroo, for $1,000 plus GST and associated fees;
5. APPROVES the construction of the following road work linked to the road reserve adjacent to the Civic Centre site subject to Administration addressing the advertised outcome to the road closure advertisement of Cafaggio Crescent and Senario Drive based upon the construction of:
a) A one way traffic flow system heading east from Cafaggio Crescent to Senario Drive with localised drainage and angle carparking;
b) A one way traffic flow system heading south from Senario Drive to Dundebar Road with localised drainage and angle carparking;
c) A mini roundabout at the intersection of Senario Drive and Dundebar Road;
d) Localised drainage and additional carparking at the southern end of Servite Terrace;
11. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council on the excision of an area of 1,600m2 from the south-east corner of Lot 505 (ie: located on the corner of the Dundebar Road/Senario Drive intersection) as a commercial lot for potential sale."
Subsequent to that report, Lot 555 was created following the acquisition of the adjoining drainage sump (Reserve 46538) and subsequent amalgamation with Lot 505 to facilitate the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Project.
Detail
Within the report presented to Council at its meeting on 4 March 2014 (IN02-03/14), it was resolved that a 1600m2 portion of the WCC site be excised and sold or leased as a commercial property. Although plans attached in the report indicated an 1800m2 excision.
The portion of land identified by Administration comprised the portion of the south-eastern corner of the WCC site, extending northward to the southern extent of proposed multi-level car parking facility and westerly to a nominal point along the Dundebar Road frontage (Attachment 1 refers).
A further report was presented to Council at its meeting 22 July 2014 (IN01-07/14) relating to the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Project and one way traffic flow proposals.
It was resolved that Council:-
"1. APPROVES the proposed partial closure to through traffic in Cafaggio Crescent and Senario Drive, in accordance with Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 to accommodate the proposed One Way Traffic Flow System heading east out of Servite Terrace via Cafaggio Crescent and south along Senario Drive into Dundebar Road, Wanneroo;
2. AUTHORISES Administration to proceed with the design and construction of the One Way Traffic Flow System outlined in Item 1 as essential forward civil works in support of the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Project (PR-2233); and
3. ADVISES the respondents to the "Road Closure Notice for One Way Traffic Flow" process of Council's decision, incorporating the comments in this report."
It was anticipated that the traffic flow modification and on-street car parking design would deliver a 151 car parking bay surplus.
Following further review and consideration by Administration it was decided to revise the extent of the excision area as originally outlined in the "Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Concept Plan". The new proposed lot would encompass the area of land east of the existing Dundebar Road entrance to the Civic Centre car park, extending from the existing southern boundary northward to the existing Civic Centre car bays, creating a lot of approximately 1035m2 in area (Attachment 2 refers).
It was considered the revised 1035m2 subdivision design was a more logical and cost effective option. The redesign retains the existing entrance and pedestrian pathway from Dundebar Road, facilitates all existing car parking infrastructure and negates the requirement for relocation of existing transformer/bin compound and underground utility service lines.
Within the 4 March 2014 Council report, Infrastructure Directorate's Cost Planner estimated the cost to provide for all civil, survey establishment and agent costs for the 1600m2 subdivision design would be $209,500. Estimated costs to complete works for the revised design have not been compiled to date. All costs involved in this associated project would be funded from the City's 10-Year Capital Works Program for the Civic Centre Extension Project (PR-2332). In the event that the proposal is supported by Council, Administration will be responsible for the project management of all civil works required to satisfy all relevant conditions for subdivision approval and the City Businesses Directorate will be responsible for managing the subdivision and the disposal processes.
Administration as yet has not sought an independent property valuation for the proposed excision area. However recent sales figures of similar commercial vacant land in surrounding locations, provided by Landgate indicate that lots sales range in price from $535 to $1100 per square metre (ex GST), averaging $655 per square metre (ex GST). In comparison, the City disposed of the GP Super Clinic site in September 2011 at a rate of $750 per square metre.
Based on the average figure of recent sales the City could potentially dispose of the 1035m2 site for an estimated $678,000 (ex GST) subject to the site being fully serviced and unencumbered vacant land.
Alternatively the City could dispose of the excised land under a long-term ground lease arrangement. Whereby an interested party would develop and operate a commercial facility to satisfy its requirements and lease the land from the City, as opposed to outright purchase. This option has the capacity to provide the City with ongoing income source for the term of the lease. Based on a current return rate of between 4-6% for ground rent on the estimated vacant land value ($678,000), this could potentially return the City an estimated $27,000-$41,000 per annum in rent.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
With the recent completion of the GP Super Clinic located immediately opposite, Administration considers the proposed 1035m2 site would be commercially attractive for complementary business activities. Based on an assumption of 80% site coverage, all required parking facilitated by nearby proposed on-street parking bays and an estimated average employment rate of one job per 50m2 of floor space. A three-storey commercial development on the subject portion of land has the potential to develop approximately 2,400m2 of new floor space and generate in the order 45 new employment positions.
Administration considers the revised excision of 1035m2 from the WCC site to be the preferred subdivisional design option and should therefore form the basis of any future subdivision application to provide a site suitable for commercial development.
There are no perceived risks involved with the excision of the WCC site as proposed, as the City will potentially gain an unbudgeted income stream. In the event the site is not disposed the City will retain the freehold ownership of a strategic commercial development site.
Statutory Compliance
Any subsequent disposal of the land must be undertaken in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995,
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.2 Growing Business - Our community is a preferred place for business to locate and grow.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
The proposed excision of the Wanneroo Civic Centre site is consistent with the Wanneroo Town Centre Local Planning Policy and could contribute to achieving development outcomes of the Wanneroo Town Centre Structure Plan.
Financial Implications
The excision, servicing and civil works of a commercial lot from the WCC site, was estimated at $209,500 in the Wanneroo Civic Centre Extension Project report presented to Council at its meeting on 4 March 2014 (IN02-03/14).
All works associated with the proposed excision will be funded from Civic Centre Extension Project (PR-2332). Subsequent to disposal, funds accessed would be credited back to PR-2332, with the balance of proceeds to be allocated to the Asset Replacement Reserve.
The disposal of the Site (lease or sale) could result in an unbudgeted income stream, together with the generation of future rate income source to the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS in principle the excision of portion of the Wanneroo Civic Centre site, being Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo and comprising an approximate area of 1035m2 as outlined in this report to create a future commercial development site and NOTES this design will form the basis of an application for subdivision of Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo;
2. SUPPORTS the submission of a subdivision application to the relevant Regulatory Authorities seeking the approval for the excision of portion of Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo comprising an approximate area of 1035m2 as outlined in this report;
3. NOTES that all costs involved in relation to the proposed excision of portion of Lot 555 is to be funded by the City's 10-Year Capital Works Program for the Civic Centre Extension Project (PR-2332);
4. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to affix the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Transfer of Land documentation for the subdivision of Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy;
5. NOTES any other associated documentation relating to the subdivision of Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo are to be executed in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy; and
6. NOTES that a further report will be presented to Council regarding any future disposal of the proposed excised portion of Lot 555 (23) Dundebar Road, Wanneroo, subject to the granting of all statutory approvals for the proposed subdivision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - WCC Extension Concept Plan |
13/216679 |
|
|
2. |
Attachment 2 - WCC Revised Infrastructure Excision Plan |
14/408352 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 150
File Ref: 14813 – 15/17250
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the excision of land from State Forest No. 65 for the proposed upgrade of Neaves Road, Pinjar.
Background
The City's 2014/15-2023/14 Long Term Financial Plan provides for staged improvements to Neaves Road to add turning lanes and overtaking lanes. In 2016/17, funds are allocated for the construction of an overtaking lane opposite Meadowlands Drive, Pinjar. The need to upgrade Neaves Road was identified by Transport and Traffic.
The road widening for the overtaking lane requires the excision of approximately 1,772m2 (subject to survey) ("the Road Portion") from State Forest No. 65, 399 Neaves Road, Pinjar (being Lot 5607 on Deposited Plan 208673, Qualified Certificate of Crown Land Title Volume LR3121 Folio 481) ("Lot 5607") (Attachment 1 refers). The Road Portion is situated at the north-west corner of the Neaves Road/ Meadowlands Drive intersection.
Detail
Land Management
Lot 5607 is managed by the Conservation Commission of Western Australia, represented by the Department of Parks and Wildlife ("DPaW").
Administration understands that the excision of the Road Portion from Lot 5607 will involve the following process:
1. DPaW and the Department of Lands ("DoL") provide 'in principle' support to the excision;
2. Council resolves to support the excision in accordance with section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997 (WA) ("LAA");
3. Land survey to be undertaken by the City's nominated surveyor on instructions from DoL, with a deposited plan to be prepared for the Road Portion;
4. City to liaise with DPaW seeking formal support for the excision;
5. DPaW to submit proposed excision to the Minister for Environment;
6. The matter is to be presented to Parliament for debate and must be passed by both Houses of Parliament in accordance with Section 9 of the Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA); and
7. Once the both Houses of Parliament approve the proposal, it can be gazetted and the dedication of the Road Portion as public road can be finalised.
Construction
The Neaves Road intersection upgrade at Meadowlands Drive is listed in the Roads section of the 2016/17 Capital Works Program. The $150,000 proposed works involves the provision of an overtaking lane and protected right turn lane, hence the road widening and land requirement on the northern side of Neaves Road. This is the last stage of the upgrade to Neaves Road at the present time.
Consultation
In response to an enquiry by Administration, DPaW advised that:
1. DPaW consented 'in principle' to the excision of the Road Portion;
2. DPaW would consult with relevant government department and agencies and service authorities to confirm that there were no objections to the proposed excision of the Road Portion; and
3. A native vegetation clearing permit was not required as there was no native vegetation in the Road Portion.
DPaW has conducted its consultation with relevant government departments and agencies and service authorities. No material objections were received. Any technical feedback was provided to Infrastructure Projects.
In response to an enquiry from DPaW, DoL provided 'in principle' support to the proposed excision. DoL further advised that the City would need to meet any requirements arising from section 24K of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
Comment
The excision of the Road Portion from Lot 5607 for road widening is necessary for the upgrade of Neaves Road.
On the basis that:
· the upgrade of Neaves Road is an existing City project, with funding allocated in the 2014/15-2023/14 Long Term Financial Plan; and
· DPaW and DoL support the land acquisition,
Administration recommends that the City requests the ceding of the Road Portion for road reserve.
Statutory Compliance
The ability to dedicate land as road reserve is authorised by the provisions of the Land Administration Act 1997 (WA) ("the LAA").
Section 56 of the LAA provides that where a local government requests the Minister for Lands to dedicate land as a road it is to indemnify the Minister against any claim for compensation that may arise from that action.
In the case of the Road Portion, the request to dedicate the land as public road will be made by the City, with DPaW and the Conservation Commission of Western Australia to assist in effecting the dedication.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.3 Easy to Get Around - The community is well connected and accessible with an integrated transport approach for all.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Funding for the Neaves Road intersection upgrade project at Meadowlands Drive, Pinjar is listed in the Roads section of the 2016/17 Capital Works Program. Approval for the $150,000 funding is to be sought as part of the 2016/17 budget approval process.
The City should not be required to pay a purchase price for the land acquisition, save that the City may be expected to pay all costs arising from the ceding of the Road Portion, including survey, subdivision and other approval costs, Landgate registration fees, and the costs of replacement and installation of fencing and firebreaks. These costs and fees will be payable from the Land Acquisition Reserve with funding allocated to Project No PR-1056 as follows:
|
Description |
Code |
Amount |
|
Land Acquisition Reserve |
981501-9999-953 |
($15,000.00 + GST) |
|
PR-1056 Purchase Land - Road Reserves |
211501-9499-229 |
$15,000.00 + GST |
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. LISTS for consideration an amount of $150,000 in the 2016/17 Capital Works Program for the Neaves Road intersection upgrade project at Meadowlands Drive, Pinjar;
2. REQUESTS in conjunction with the Conservation Commission of Western Australia and the Department of Parks and Wildlife, to:
a) excise a 1,772m2 (subject to survey) portion of State Forest No. 65, 399 Neaves Road, Pinjar (being Lot 5607 on Deposited Plan 208673) as depicted in Attachment 1 ("the Road Portion"); and
b) dedicate the Road Portion as public road under section 56 of the Land Administration Act 1997;
3. INDEMNIFIES the Minister for Lands against any claim for compensation arising from the dedication of the Road Portion as public road;
4. DELEGATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to execute such documents as are required by the Minister for Lands to effect the dedication of the Road Portion as public road;
5. Pursuant to Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 (WA) APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the agreed expenditure for the payment of the costs and fees to acquire the Road Portion as outlined in Administration's report; and
6. NOTES the costs and fees to acquire the Road Portion will be funded from the Land Acquisition Reserve.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Land Acquisition Plan - Lot 5607, Neaves Road, Pinjar |
15/17380 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 155
Other Matters
File Ref: 5300 – 15/39569
Responsible Officer: Director City Businesses
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the distribution of excess mulch stockpiled at the Wangara Recycling Centre (WRC) under a community water saving initiative.
Background
The WRC facility receives and processes over 8000 tonnes of green waste material per year which is mulched and on sold to third parties. Currently, the mulched green waste is offered at no charge by the trailer load to ratepayers from the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup through a free voucher system, currently being 1 voucher per year. The free mulch vouchers are distributed with the annual rates, however if the ratepayers do not have a voucher, a charge per load is incurred; as per the adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges.
Detail
Over the last three to four years, the WRC has accumulated an excess of mulch stockpiled on the adjacent landfill site. It is estimated to be in excess of 6000 cubic metres. This excess mulch poses potential risks for the site; in particular, spot fires and dust blowing to neighbouring businesses/residents. Additionally, there is a compliance risk in regards to the levels of mulch kept onsite; as monitored by the Department of Environment Regulation (DER). Whilst the risks are being mitigated through the installation of a sprinkler system, the current demand for mulch is insufficient to address the excess mulch supply.
· Since 1/3/14 to 7/2/15, 20,863 loads of green waste have been received via the free tip passes provided to the community as part of their annual rates with a further 941 loads paid for via the Schedule of Fees and Charges. (approx. 500kg per load)
· Since April 2014 we have shredded enough green waste to create a further 17,040 cubic metres of mulch, at a cost of $138,876.
· We have sold/given away 7297 cubic metres of mulch from 1/3/14-7/2/15 to the public and 6430 cubic metres were given away to commercial businesses, city projects, schools and non for profit organisations.
Consultation
The excess mulch at the WRC was noted in the Waste Management Advisory Committee meeting as at 8 October 2013. Furthermore, City of Joondalup ratepayers are still delivering greens to the site but are not taking their proportionate allocation of mulch in return.
Comment
The Perth climate, with excessive summer heat and strong winds, coupled with winters of minimal rainfall, has led to a very dry environment. Despite this, residents are encouraged to maintain gardens to enhance the aesthetic value of their homes; as well as providing a natural green backdrop to their place of residence. In order to conserve water and maintain healthy gardens, mulch is highly recommended. Applying mulch to the garden can greatly reduce evaporation loss, improve the soil, reduce plant stress and weed growth.
In February 2014, in order to encourage water saving measures for the community and to address the accumulated excess of mulch the City introduced a Community Water Saving Initiative, proposing to offer free mulch to the ratepayers from both the City of Wanneroo and Joondalup (non commercial loads; 6x4 trailers only). A report was presented to Council in February 2014 and it was recommenced with Absolute Majority
“That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative to the ratepayers of the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup for the period March 2014 to February 2015 inclusive (non commercial loads; 6x4 trailers only) to reduce the excess mulch stockpiled at the WRC.
2. NOTES there will be no limitation on the amount of mulch taken by City of Wanneroo and Joondalup ratepayers (non commercial loads; 6x4 trailers only) with a review at the six month period of the program.
3. NOTES that the business of the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative (accepting green waste) will be reviewed in the Waste Minimisation Strategy currently being developed by Administration.
4. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative by waiving the current fees and charges of $15.00 per trailer load and $8.00 per half load respectively; for the period March 2014 to February 2015 inclusive.”
The program commenced 1 March 2014 and is due to finish at the end of February 2015.
Administration will be reviewing this arrangement when developing the new Strategic Waste Management Plan that is expected to be adopted by the end of the 2014/2015 financial year.
Statutory Compliance
Section 6.12 of the Local Government Act 1995 provides that:-
(1) Subject to subsection (2)and and other written law, a local government may –
a) when adopting the annual budget, grant* a discount or other incentive for the early payment of any amount of money;
b) waive or grant concessions in relation to any amount of money; or
c) write off any amount of money.
Which is owed to the local Government.
*Absolute majority required"
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.2 Conserve Water - We will have a community that encourages water conservation resulting in access to the right amount of water to meet our requirements”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Options to address surplus mulch volume.
1) Revert to pre Mulch Program Estimated Income $ 55,000 per annum
(February 2014) Estimated Expenses -$108,000 per annum
Net Cost -$ 53,000
2) Continuation of Mulch Program: Estimated Income $0 per annum
(Extend offer to June 2016) Estimated Expenses $0 per annum
Net Cost $0
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative to the ratepayers of the Cities of Wanneroo and Joondalup, City projects and non for profit organisations for the period March 2015 to June 2016 with 2 x 12 month options to extend the program to reduce the excess mulch stockpiled at the WRC;
2. SUPPORTS the disposal of additional excess mulch to commercial businesses to ensure compliance with site safety standards and DER licence requirements when and only if required;
3. NOTES there will be no limitation on the amount of mulch taken by City of Wanneroo and Joondalup ratepayers (non commercial loads; 6x4 trailers only). All other volumes will be negotiated by administration on the grounds of compliance with the sites licence and safety standards;
4. NOTES that the business of the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative (accepting green waste) will be reviewed in the Strategic Waste Management Plan currently being developed by Administration; and
5. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the waiver of the Mulch Program – Community Water Saving Initiative current fees and charges of $15.00 per trailer load and $8.00 per half load respectively for the period March 2015 to June 2016 with 2 x 12 month extension options.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 158
Infrastructure
File Ref: 4428 – 14/275336
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
For Mike to Issue
To consider of the outcomes of the application to the Western Australian Planning Commission, for the City's Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan associated with the proposed Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility to be located at the Yanchep Lagoon.
Background
Council, at its meeting of 19 August 2014 (IN02-08/14 refers) considered the draft report of the Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan (CHRMAP) for the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility (YSLSC) project, and resolved as follows:
“1. RECEIVES the Cardno report titled, "Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan" dated July 2014 as shown at Attachment 1;
2. AUTHORISES Administration to lodge the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan to the West Australian Planning Commission, noting the plan as proposed will require an estimated additional cost of $450,000 to be added to the project budget in order to implement the recommendations arising out of the plan over and above current approved budget for the project; and
3. Notes that Administration will submit a further report to Council on the outcomes of the consideration by the West Australian Planning Commission of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan.”
Detail
On 1 September 2014 the City submitted its CHRMAP for the YSLSC to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC).
The Department of Planning (DoP) provided its comments and requested changes to the CHRMAP on 17 October 2014, with the main change requested being an increase to the erosion levels for each of the climate change intervals.
After consultation with both the University of Western Australia (the City's consultant who undertook the initial Coastal Assessment Study for the Yanchep Lagoon) and Cardno (the City's consultant for the preparation of the CHRMAP), it was concurred that DoP erosion figures could be accepted on the basis that the overall design life for the YSLSC be reduced from 100 years to 50 years.
A revised CHRMAP document was produced and submitted to WAPC on 12 November 2014 (refer Attachment 1). On 18 November 2014 DoP confirmed that the revised CHRMAP was approved to the satisfaction of the WAPC in compliance of Condition 11 of the WAPC Development Approval dated 10 October 2013.
The process to achieve approval for the CHRMAP from WAPC to enable the City to proceed to design development, has taken over 12 month to achieve. As a consequence, consideration needs to be given to project milestones that are able to be delivered within the remaining timeframe through to expiry of the Development Approval on 10 October 2015.
Consultation
During the course of the development for the CHRMAP, the City's CHRMAP Consultant has consulted with the stakeholder groups listed below, defining involvement at the outset of the CHRMAP development process and to establish an evaluation/success criterion:
· Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club
· The City's Community Development Directorate
· Surf Life Saving WA
· Yanchep Two Rocks Residents Association
Comment
In revising the design life for the YSLSC to 50 years for the development, the apron and clubhouse are expected to be exposed to coastal hazards earlier than originally intended. As a consequence, the impact of coastal hazards now needs to be accommodated within a shorter timeframe along with associated protection options. Monitoring in the future may recommend that avoid or managed retreat solutions may need to be implemented at the end of the YSLSC's design life to coincide with asset management cycles such as the need to investigate retreat options when the YSLSC is next redesigned and/or rebuilt.
Apron and Clubhouse
For the apron and the YSLSC, designing to withstand impacts could include the construction of a retaining wall seaward of the apron to stabilise the soil. This could be constructed using sheet piling, precast concrete, rock armour or a combination of these with or without buried riprap protection.
The protected apron would act as a buffer for the YSLSC, this in turn reducing the risk of coastal impact.
A dune care program is also recommended for implementation immediately following completion of construction, with beach nourishment implemented only when erosion is threatening dune stability. If buried riprap is used as part of the retaining wall system and is subsequently exposed due to a particular coastal erosion event, then this would need to be covered through beach nourishment works immediately after the event.
Access Path
The access path will be subject to coastal hazards much more frequently, and difficulties over the next 50 years are most likely unavoidable. If erosion progresses as predicted, the access path will require one or more realignments throughout its lifetime. This managed retreat strategy will allow the interface between the beach and the access path to remain out of the ‘very high risk’ coastal zone, whilst continuing to permit access and ensure operational success. The emergency plan option is aimed primarily at safety. It involves inspection of the beach-access path interface after a severe weather event to see if damage has occurred.
If the access path is not suitable for traffic then it should be closed by a physical barrier and have warnings signposted. Public access to the beach via the path may be closed prior to and during storms as well to minimise safety hazards.
Piling the access path would ensure stability, but during severe erosion the beach/path interface could be lost resulting in the path becoming un-trafficable, even though it would still be intact. However, piling the access path will make managed retreat more difficult and less economically feasible, with this to be managed appropriately following erosion events. Sand management may be important for the access path after erosion events. If a scarp prevents safe access to the beach for vehicles and pedestrians, beach scraping will be the most economical way to re-establish the connection.
Beach nourishment will need to be investigated if erosive problems persist, along with the possibility of managed retreat mitigation works.
Dune Degradation
Dune degradation is already occurring at Yanchep Lagoon Beach due to uncontrolled pedestrian and vehicle traffic. The dune system is an essential component of the coastal environment and provides natural protection. As a consequence, a dune care program is strongly recommended as it is the most economical method for protecting the YSLSC and apron.
Sand management should also be implemented when possible to assist with the natural recovery of the fore dune after severe erosion events.
Monitoring and Review
Monitoring and review of the CHRMAP is required to keep it up to date during the design life of the YSLSC development and in compliance with State Coastal Planning Policy 2.6. This requires the impacts to each asset component of the YSLSC to be noted throughout the development’s lifetime.
It is also noted that the CHRMAP document is to be reviewed every 5 years to ensure adequate risk protection for the development, with this review including a detailed log of the impacts on the condition of each asset component.
Current Development Approval
Based on receipt of the CHRMAP approval, the City's program for the development and construction of the YSLSC was revised and allowing for usual reporting processes, commencement of construction has tentatively been scheduled for November 2015. This timeframe is pre-empted on a report on the outcome of the construction tender being presented for consideration by Council at its October 2015 meeting. This clearly fails to meet the requirements of the current Development Approval timeframe requiring the development to have substantially commenced by 10 October 2014 otherwise approval lapses. As a consequence, the Planning and Sustainability Directorate are currently progressing a new application for Development Approval for the YSLSC so as to ensure that construction of the YSLSC is substantially commenced within a redefined Development Approval period.
Given subsequent receipt of WAPC's approval of the CHRMAP, Administration made the decision to immediately commence preparation of tender documentation for provision of design development and contract administration services for the YSLSC, with public tender advertised on 29 November 2014 (closing 20 January 2015). The outcome of this process is presented for consideration under separate cover of this Council Agenda, (refer Item No IN02-03/15) It is noted that if any development related issues arise in lead up to or as a result of a new Development Approval then these will be assessed on a case-by-case basis, with appropriate mitigation determined.
If during either process an issue is deemed to impact on detailed design then appropriate review/update of the design will be attended too prior to proceeding to tender for the construction of the YSLSC.
On completion of design development, tender documentation for the construction of the YSLSC will be advanced, with the tender publically advertised thereafter. A report addressing the outcome of Administration's tender evaluation process will then be presented for consideration by Council.
Statutory Compliance
A new Development Approval is being sought for the YSLSC due to delay in finalising the CHRMAP and the subsequent ability to meet requirements of the current Development Approval.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
Management Systems Effectiveness Rating |
|
Project Management |
Moderate |
Newly Introduced |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
|
Additionally and as recommended in the CHRMAP report, the City is to consider monitoring and review such that the CHRMAP is kept up to date during the design life of the YSLSC development. A formal review every five years to ensure adequate risk protection for the YSLSC development is also proposed.
Impacts to each asset are to be noted throughout the YSLSC development’s lifetime, with a log of the condition of each component to be included in the 5-yearly review of the CHRMAP. Assets to be monitored are:
· Clubhouse;
· Service apron, including the proposed underground stormwater system;
· Access path; and
· Dune system and foreshore reserve area, including the beach.
Consistent photographic monitoring of the beach allows a qualitative analysis to be performed in the future, and can help identify the cause of any issues, such as erosion, that arise over time. Beach and hydrographic survey can assist in quantifying changes in the beach profile over time and are very useful when performing an historical analysis.
To enable quantitative analysis of beach change, including estimating required beach renourishment volumes, the City's CHRMAP Consultant recommends that beach and hydrographic surveys be conducted. This action will provide important information about sediment transport and changes in the beach profile to aid consideration in relation to the impact of erosion events.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As previously reported (IN02-08/14 refers), the implementation of the CHRMAP adaption methods initially resulted in an increase of up to $450,000 to the estimated total funding requirement. However, in consideration of the increased risk associated with the Access Ramp, the option to include piling of the Access Ramp has subsequently been recommended. As a consequence, an increased funding requirement of $50,000 is envisaged, raising the additional funding arising from the CHRMAP to a total of $500,000. This then raises the estimated total funding requirement of $7,272,770 for the YSLSC development as reported to Council at its meeting held on 27 May 2014 (IN03-5/14 refers) to $7,772,770. This adjustment in budget will be listed in the 10 Year Capital Works Program, with a further detailed budget review to be undertaken after the construction cost estimate for the YSLSC is certified following completion of detailed design mid November 2015.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. RECEIVES the revised Cardno report titled, "Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan dated November 2014";
2. ENDORSES the recommendations of the revised Cardno report titled, "Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan dated November 2014" to accommodate and protect, and to monitor and review, throughout the design life of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility;
3. NOTES that the Western Australian Planning Commission has approved the revised Cardno report titled, "Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan dated November 2014" in compliance of Condition 11 of the Approval issued by the Western Australian Planning Commission Development for the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility, dated 10 October 2013;
4. NOTES that the Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan (the Plan) as approved by the Western Australian Planning Commission will require an estimated additional cost of $500,000 raising the overall total project budget for the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility to $7,772,770;
5. NOTES that the City's 10-Year Capital Works Program will be updated to reflect the required increase in budgeted funding for implementation of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility;
6. NOTES that Administration is seeking a new development approval for the Yanchep Surf life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility;
7. NOTES that detailed design was advanced, with a tender report addressing Architectural Services for Design Development and Contract Administration of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Building is presented for consideration under separate cover in this Council Agenda (refer IN02-03/15); and
8. NOTES that Administration will present a further report for Council consideration addressing the outcome of tenders received for the construction of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan Rev 1A |
14/343211 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 225
Tenders
3.14 Tender No 01462 - Provision of Architectural Services for Design Development and Contract Administration of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Building
File Ref: 6443 – 14/278476
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01462 for the Provision of Architectural Services for Design Development and Contract Administration of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Building.
Background
Council, at its meeting of 19 August 2014 (IN02-08/14 refers), considered the draft report of the Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan (CHRMAP) for the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility (YSLSC) project.
“1. RECEIVES the Cardno report titled, "Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan" dated July 2014 as shown at Attachment 1;
2. AUTHORISES Administration to lodge the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan to the West Australian Planning Commission, noting the plan as proposed will require an estimated additional cost of $450,000 to be added to the project budget in order to implement the recommendations arising out of the plan over and above current approved budget for the project; and
3. Notes that Administration will submit a further report to Council on the outcomes of the consideration by the West Australian Planning Commission of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Facility - Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaption Plan.”
An update on the outcome of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) consideration, of the Coastal Hazard Risk Management Plan (CHRMAP) is presented for consideration under separate cover in Council Agenda (refer Item No IN01-03/15).
Detail
Tender No. 01462 for Provision of Architectural Services for Design Development and Contract Administration of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Building within the City of Wanneroo was advertised on 29 November 2014 and closed on 20 January 2015.
Essential details of the contract are outlined below:
|
Contract Type |
Lump Sum |
|
Contract Duration |
86 weeks |
|
Commencement Date |
18 March 2015 |
|
Expiry Date |
November 2016 |
Tender submissions were received from the following companies:
|
Tenderers |
Price |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
$443,881 |
|
CADDS Group |
$261,380 |
|
Christo Design Group |
$360,465 |
|
Eames Architects |
$288,699 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
$361,860 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
$242,220 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
$290,580 |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure |
$254,580 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
$310,346 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
$303,990 |
The Tender Evaluation Team, consisting of the Project Manager Yanchep Infrastructure, Project Manager Major Buildings and the Contracts Officer, evaluated the tender submissions in accordance with the following selection criteria:
|
Item No |
Description |
Score |
|
1 |
Price for the services offered |
50% |
|
2 |
Methodology |
20% |
|
3 |
Safety Management |
10% |
|
4 |
Tenderer’s experience and ability to do the work |
10% |
|
5 |
Tenderer’s resources |
10% |
Price for the Services Offered (50%)
An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the lump sum price provided with the tender documentation:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
1 |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
2 |
|
CADDS Group |
3 |
|
Eames Architects |
4 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
5 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
6 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
7 |
|
Christo Design Group |
8 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
9 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
10 |
Methodology (20%)
Christo Design Group provided a methodology statement and conveyed a more detailed understanding of the works to be carried out. A Gantt chart was included that clearly outlines the timelines proposed for each phase of the works.
The tender submissions were subsequently assessed based on the standard of the Christo Design Group submission as the benchmark and were ranked as follows:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
Christo Design Group |
1 |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
2 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
3 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
4 |
|
CADDS Group |
4 |
|
Eames Architects |
4 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
4 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
4 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
4 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
5 |
Tenderers experience and ability to do the work (10%)
Christo Design Group provided detailed supporting documentation in relation to experience in similar projects. While the other submissions had lesser experience relative to this project and were ranked as follows:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Christo Design Group |
1 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
2 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
2 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
3 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
4 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
4 |
|
Eames Architects |
5 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
5 |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
6 |
|
CADDS Group |
6 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
6 |
Tenderers Resources (10%)
Tenderers resources were examined in order to evaluate the ability to meet the tender requirements. Assessment of this criterion considered the extent of tenderers’ staff resources and nominated subcontractors listed, capability and experience, with the resultant ranking assessed as follows:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
1 |
|
Christo Design Group |
1 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Eames Architects |
2 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
2 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
2 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
2 |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
3 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
4 |
|
CADDS Group |
4 |
Safety Management (10%)
Evidence of safety management policies and practices was assessed based on the tenderers responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included within the tender documentation.
All the tenderers provided details of their safety management systems with the following ranking determined:
|
Tenderer |
Rank |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
CADDS Group |
2 |
|
Christo Design Group |
2 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
3 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
4 |
|
Eames Architects |
5 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
6 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
7 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
7 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
7 |
Overall Weighted Score
The tender submissions received were reviewed in accordance with the weighted score analysis process with the following observations being of significance:
– Key aspect of the tender evaluation is price; and
– Tender submissions were evaluated in accordance with the selection criteria and were all assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience, ability and safety management systems to undertake the tender.
The overall weighted score has resulted in the following tender ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Score |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Christo Design Group |
2 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
3 |
|
CADDS Group |
4 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
5 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
6 |
|
Eames Architects |
7 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
8 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
9 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
10 |
Consultation
Consultation with the YSLSC representatives during concept design was undertaken in September 2012, with some adjustments made to the final concept design layout.
The City distributed a flyer, showing the proposed footprint and proposed location for the new YSLSC facility, to residents in the Yanchep area at the commencement of a four week community consultation period on 8 October 2012. This incorporated a community consultation event at Picnic Cove that was held on 28 October 2012 at which City officers presented further ideas and plans in relation to the redevelopment of Picnic Cove to those in attendance. The overall response to the proposed relocation of the YSLSC (and associated Public Amenities facility) to the south end of the lagoon was supported by the community.
During the development for the CHRMAP, Cardno WA consulted with the stakeholder groups, to define each group's involvement at the outset of the CHRMAP development process and to establish an evaluation/success criterion.
Comment
Clarifications were sought from the top five tenderers on varying issues that were assessed as having impact upon the evaluation of each individual submission. After responses were received a further evaluation in review was conducted and overall weighted scores adjusted as deemed appropriate, with the following resultant overall tender ranking as follows:
|
Tenderer |
Score |
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
1 |
|
Hodge Collard Preston Architects |
2 |
|
Christo Design Group |
3 |
|
CADDS Group |
4 |
|
Holton Conner Architects & Planners |
5 |
|
Mark Aronson Architecture Pty Ltd |
6 |
|
Eames Architects |
7 |
|
Rob Anson Architect Pty Ltd |
8 |
|
Gresley Abas Architects |
9 |
|
Armstrong Parkin Pty Ltd |
10 |
The tender submission from Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd achieved the highest score in accordance with the assessment criteria and weighting as detailed in the tender document and is therefore recommended as the successful tenderer. Reference checks have indicated that this tenderer has previously provided a satisfactory service delivery to their customers. The Shire of Murray provided a positive reference for Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd, which has recently completed design and documentation for the City's Kingsway Baseball Clubroom project currently under construction, with no issues of concern noted.
The proposed implementation program, subject to Council resolving to award tender, has been scheduled as follows;
|
Council consideration of Tender Award |
Tue 3 March 2015 |
|
Award of Design Development Contract |
Wed 18 March 2015 |
|
Design Development – 85 % Completion |
Mon 29 June 2015 |
|
Consultation with Stakeholder Groups- Complete |
Fri 17 July 2015 |
|
Complete Design Development & Documentation |
Fri 21 August 2015 |
|
Tender Period for Construction Contract |
Tue 22 September 2015 |
|
Council Consideration of Construction Tender |
Tue 10 November 2015 |
|
Award Construction Contract |
Mon 30 November 2015 |
|
Complete On Site Construction (42 weeks) |
Wed 16 September 2016 |
|
Closeout and Final Completion |
Wed 7 October 2016 |
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“1 Environment - A Healthy and sustainable natural and built environment
1.1 Environmentally Friendly - You will be part of a community that has a balance of environmentally friendly development and conservation areas for future generations to enjoy”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
Management Systems Effectiveness Rating |
|
Project Management |
Moderate |
Newly Introduced |
|
Contract Management |
Moderate |
Newly Introduced |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
|
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost of the Design Development and Contract Administration for the YSLSC stands as follows:
|
Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club (PR-1048) |
||
|
Item |
Estimated Expenditure |
Budget |
|
Project Budget |
||
|
PR-1048 Funding Total (As at 31 December 2014) |
$1,091,289 |
|
|
PR-1048 – 2015/2016 (10 Year Capital Works Program) |
$3,000,000 |
|
|
PR-1048 – 2016/2017 (10 Year Capital Works Program) |
$2,940,000 |
|
|
Overall Project Development and Implementation |
||
|
Cost to date |
$852,332 |
|
|
Design Development (Lycopodium’s tendered cost) |
$254,580 |
|
|
Power Supply (Consultant's Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$423,000 |
|
|
Sewer Pump Station (Consultant's Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$55,000 |
|
|
Stormwater Drainage to comply with WAPC requirement of 1:100 year storm event (Consultant's Preliminary Cost Estimate) |
$180,000 |
|
|
Tender Advertising and Signage |
$7,000 |
|
|
Construction of YSLSC (Estimate) |
$4,027,000 |
|
|
Car Park Construction (Estimate) |
$845,000 |
|
|
Project Management Costs |
$150,000 |
|
|
Cost Associated with Recommendations from CHRMAP |
$500,000 |
|
|
Total Order of Cost Estimate |
$7,293,912 |
|
|
Contingency Sum |
$478,858 |
|
|
Total |
$7,772,770 |
$7,031,289 |
Total project funding of $7,772,770 reflects the outcome of the WAPC's consideration of the City's CHRMAP as presented for consideration under separate cover in this Council Agenda (refer Item No IN01-03/15).
The additional funding requirement will be listed for consideration in the forthcoming 10 Year Capital Works Program. It is also noted that the exact funding requirements for this project will be reviewed after construction cost estimates are prepared following completion of detailed design.
Financial check from Corporate Score Card was sought, with Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd having a score of 9.64, indicating that it has a very strong financial capacity to undertake the contract in question.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
1. That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd for Tender No. 01462 for Provision of Architectural Services for Design Development and Contract Administration of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Public Amenities Building for the fixed lump sum price of $254,580 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document; and
2. NOTES that the City's 10-Year Capital Works Program will be updated to reflect the required increase in budgeted funding for implementation of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club & Public Amenities Facility.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 232
File Ref: 19142 – 15/28097
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider Tender No. 01445 for the Provision of On-Site Hire Items within the City of Wanneroo for a period of three years, with two 12 month options to extend at the City's discretion.
Background
The provision of on-site hire items for use on construction and maintenance projects has been addressed in the past through quotation based panel period contracts, with this service currently provided by Coates Hire and GCS Budget Portables since 1 February 2012 under the provisions of Period Quotation Contract Q2816.
Typically, the service consists of the supply and delivery of items to site often for the duration of a construction project. This is especially the case for ablution and lunchroom facilities, and trench boxes for some drainage projects.
The current total annual value of this service requires that a formal tender process now be conducted.
Detail
Tender No. 01445 (copy available in the Elected Members Reading Room) was advertised on Saturday 15 November 2014 and closed on Tuesday 2 December 2014.
Essential details of the contract are shown in the following table:
|
Contract type |
Schedule of Rates |
|
Contract duration |
3 Years |
|
Commencement date |
4 March 2015 |
|
Expiry date |
3 March 2018 |
|
Extension to contract |
Yes – 2 x12 month periods up to 3 March 2020, with CPI applied |
|
Rise and fall included |
No |
Tenders received
Two tender submissions were received from the following companies:
|
Company |
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
|
Premium Hire Pty Ltd |
As Premium Hire only tendered on one item (being variable message boards); its submission was subsequently deemed non-compliant and not considered for further evaluation.
The Coates Hire tender submission contained a number of departures from the City's General Conditions of Contract primarily related to insurance and liability issues. These items have been satisfactorily resolved to the satisfaction of the City's lawyer.
The Tender Evaluation Team, comprising the Contracts Officer and two Projects Engineers, evaluated the tender submission from Coates Hire in accordance with the following selection criteria and weightings:
|
Item No |
Description |
Score |
|
1 |
Price for services offered |
50% |
|
2 |
Tenderers' previous experience and ability |
20% |
|
3 |
Tenderers' resources available for this contract |
20% |
|
4 |
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) |
10% |
Price of services offered (50%)
An assessment was made to determine the acceptability of the schedule of rates in comparison with the expiring rates. A comparison of each rate was made and although mobilisation and demobilisation rates have increased by between 20% and 60%, the daily and weekly hire rates are lower by approximately 30% for several items and only marginally lower on some items. In accordance with a detailed evaluation (based on all items being used for a continuous five week sample period) the prices were assessed on an overall basis to be at least 13% less than the current expiring period quotation which is considered reasonable and acceptable.
Tenderers' previous experience (20%)
Coates Hire is one of Australia's largest national hire companies with over 120 years experience. There are several branches in Perth which have been responsive to WA's needs in recent years. With the current downturn in resource industry activity, hire item availability is currently very good. Hire activity within the local government sector is common and Coates Hire has previously supplied the City with on-site hire items in recent years. The company has certifications and accreditations consistent with what is a pre-requisite for providing a safe quality service in today's market.
Tenderers' resources available and capacity for this contract (20%)
Resources defined in the tender submission documentation were examined in order to evaluate Tenderers' ability to meet the tender requirements. Assessment in accordance with this criterion took into account Tenderers' staff resources, vehicles, plant/equipment and capacity to meet the City's requirements.
Coates Hire provided sufficient tender information and demonstrating its resources to fulfil the tender requirements without any need to subcontract out any of the work. Attention was given to Coates Hire's commitments foreseen during the contract period and no concerns of any lack of capacity to fulfil the contract requirements are evident. It was noted that the downturn in the resources sector lessens competing demands on the company's resources.
Coates Hire has 41,000 items of plant in 19 categories with a value of $640M in Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory. The company has been assessed to have the capacity to meet the City's needs without any adverse effect from current and forecast commitments, as well as excellent maintenance program that ensures its plant and equipment remains functional and available.
Occupational Health and Safety (10%)
Evidence of occupational health and safety management systems, policies and practices, defined as necessary in the tender documents, was evaluated and the Coates Hire tender submission was assessed as being compliant, although no worked examples were provided.
The assessment for occupational health and safety management was therefore largely based on Coates Hire's response to the Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included in the tender documentation notes that the equipment hired under this new contract provisions will be checked for its suitability and safe use on the City’s sites.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Coates Hire Operations is well suited to providing the required services and it is noted that this company has a good performance record over the past three years providing on-site hire equipment to the City of Wanneroo under period quotation arrangements. The company is assessed as a suitable service provider based on the overall assessment, especially given pricing is less than the expiring Period Quotation and is therefore determined as the preferred service provider.
It is recommended that Coates Hire Operations be appointed as the successful tenderer for the provision of on-site hire items in accordance with the defined tender requirements.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of the City's Purchasing Policy.
Financial Implications
The extent of expenditure associated with this contract for the provision of on-site hire items within the City is dependent on the nature of the approved capital works program and maintenance works. The cost of hiring each item required for construction projects is charged direct to each project. Requests made for maintenance works are charged to the respective Maintenance Works Operating Budget allocations and generally utilisation of on-site hire items provided through this contract would be low.
Based on the schedule of rates in the tender submission from Coates Hire, as evaluated by the Tender Evaluation Team, with due regard to the likely type and quantity of equipment hire arising from capital and maintenance works, the value of service procurement is estimated to be within the range of $126,000 to $145,000 per annum for a contract period of three years, plus the potential to review/issue two 12 months extensions.
On the basis of information obtained by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd who was commissioned to undertake a financial assessment of the company, Coates Hire Operations has been assigned a score of 6.14, indicating that the company has a sound financial capacity to undertake the contract in question.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted by Coates Hire Operations for Tender No. 01445 for Provision of On-Site Hire Items for a period of 3-years from 4 March 2015 to 3 March 2018 at the rates defined in the tendered price schedule and in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document, with the option to extend by a further 12-month period up to 3 March 2019 and again to 3 March 2020, with CPI applied in each instant.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 236
Traffic Management
3.16 Rangeview Road, Landsdale - Proposed Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation results
File Ref: 3125V02 – 14/163430
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the results of community consultation for the proposed implementation of a Traffic Management Scheme along Rangeview Road, Landsdale.
Background
Council at its meeting of 7 February 2012 considered a report investigating the impact of the Mirrabooka Avenue extension, from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road on vehicle movements within the Locality of Landsdale and resolved in part to:-
“2. NOTES that Administration will develop a traffic management plan for Rangeview Road Drive and report the results of community consultation based on that plan to Council within the next 12 months.”
A location map of the subject site is shown as Attachment 1.
Detail
A Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) for Rangeview Road was developed and subsequently sent to residents to ascertain the level of community support for the proposal. The TMS (Attachment 2 refers) mainly consists of the installation of speed cushions along Rangeview Road and the installation of some additional street lighting to improve the visibility of the proposed speed cushions at night. In developing a cost effective traffic management plan for community consultation, Administration considered the following aspects:
· Road function and configuration;
· Intersections;
· Crossovers;
· Pathways;
· Lighting;
· Traffic treatment spacing; and
· Bus routes
Road function, Intersections and Crossovers
Rangeview Road is classified as a Local Distributor Road in accordance with the City's Functional Road Hierarchy. It is a single carriageway starting from Hepburn Avenue and ending at Kingsway and contained within a 20 metre wide road reserve. It is a straight section of road 830 metres long. The road's longitudinal grades are fairly mild for the section between Hepburn Avenue and Landsdale Road. However from Landsdale Road to Kingsway the grades are much steeper leading up to a crest halfway between Landsdale Road and Kingsway.
The carriageway width is generally 7.5 metres wide but widens to 10 metres for a 120 metre section at the crest of the road, just south of Kingsway, incorporating a painted median with raised median islands at either side of the crest to provide separation for opposing approaching traffic.
There is currently four intersections along the entire length of Rangeview Road with further intersection expected when further land development occurs. In accordance with Main Roads WA standards, speed cushions should not be located within 20 metres of an intersection.
The traffic treatments have been chosen with the requirement to reduce speed without displacing traffic onto local roads.
The majority of the property frontages are less than 20 metres and the typical crossover width for each property is in the order 6 metres. There is sufficient spacing between crossovers to locate the required speed cushion treatments. As a major portion of the abutting properties between Landsdale Road and Kingsway have yet to be developed, there were minimal restrictions to locating the speed cushions along this section of Rangeview Road.
Street Lighting
To ensure that traffic treatments are observable at night, the Australian Standard for street lighting (AS1158 Section 3.2.6.1) states the following (in part);
"The intention of the lighting associated with the device is to alert the driver approaching at a speed too high to safely pass through the device of both the presence and nature of the device so that the driver can adjust speed accordingly.
To achieve this each device shall be provided with an illumination of not less than 3.5 lux, in addition to the general road lighting, over the relevant design area."
The installation of any traffic treatment device therefore needs to take into consideration the location of existing street lighting to minimise additional costs.
In this instance, the locations of the speed cushions wherever possible have been located adjacent to existing street lights. There is one location where this could not be achieved and an additional street light is proposed to be installed.
Traffic Treatment Spacing
To ensure that the desired effect of installing traffic management is achieved it is important that the relative distance between devices is kept constant. The number and location of speed cushions on any road depends on the availability of other treatments along the road such as roundabouts, horizontal deflections and property access. In accordance with Main Roads standards, speed cushions should ideally be spaced between 80 and 100m apart with a maximum of 250m to achieve the best results. If the treatments are placed too close, drivers may become frustrated and seek alternative routes through local access streets or engage in anti-social behaviour. If the treatments are placed too far apart, the overall effect will be lost and drivers will accelerate/decelerate at between devices.
Bus routes
Rangeview Road is part of the Public Transport Authority (PTA) bus route network and the installation of any traffic treatment devices along Rangeview Road would need to accommodate the passage of PTA buses for its entire length. It should be noted that in cases where roads are listed as being part of a PTA bus route, the effectiveness of any proposed traffic management scheme is less effective due to the need to accommodate for buses.
Consultation
A survey letter was sent out on 11 August 2014 to 56 owners and occupiers of properties abutting Rangeview Road to ascertain the opinion of the residents affected by the proposal. (Attachment 3 refers). The survey was completed on 1 September 2014.
There were eight responses received (14% response rate), all respondents were in favour of the TMS proposed.
Comment
In developing the Rangeview Road TMS for community consultation, consideration was given to all existing infrastructure and the road configuration and geometry. Approximately 50% of properties fronting Rangeview Road are yet to be developed. As development occurs, developers will be expected to upgrade the adjoining Rangeview Road potentially to incorporate medians, street trees and on street parking. In consideration to the future development potential adjacent to Rangeview Road, the TMS was developed to be as cost effective as possible with the goal to ensure that any installed treatments had minimal impact on the existing infrastructure. In this instance, rubberised speed cushions were selected as the most appropriate traffic treatment option to assist in addressing the majority of traffic issues whilst having minimal impact on the existing road infrastructure.
The response rate of 14% for the community survey is lower than is normally expected, however the unanimous support for the scheme is a positive indicator that the community is in favour of the proposed scheme overall. Many of the comments made by residents alluded to the volume of speeding traffic along Rangeview Road. The use of speed cushions in other metropolitan areas has proven to be effective in reducing speeding activity.
Based on the support received from the respondents, it is recommended that the proposed TMS in Rangeview Road be approved with no changes made to the scheme as proposed in City's Drawing No. 2994-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There is no funding allocation in the City's current 10-Year Capital Works Program for the installation of the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Rangeview Road. The cost to implement the proposed Traffic Management Scheme is estimated at $85,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Rangeview Road as detailed in the City's Drawing No. 2994-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers);
2. LISTS an amount of $85,000 within the City's 10 year Capital Works Program for the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Rangeview Road as detailed in the City's Drawing No. 2994-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers); and
3. ADVISES the residents of Rangeview Road of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Rangeview Raod - Locality Plan |
15/16712 |
|
|
2. |
Rangeview Road - Drawing 2994-1-0 |
15/16720 |
Minuted |
|
3. |
Rangeview Road - Community Consultation Letter & Survey |
15/16714 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 244
File Ref: 3125V02 – 15/4569
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the proposed installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive (south), Marangaroo.
Background
Council on the 13 June 2000 considered report W155-06/100 – Marangaroo Precinct Traffic Management Study and resolved in part as follows:
"That Council:-
1. RECEIVE the Marangaroo Traffic Management Study May 2000 Report as prepared by Kyle Consultants and Wood Grieve Engineering Consultants.
2. ACCEPT the recommendations of the Marangaroo Traffic Management Study May 2000 Report as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to this report, with the implementation program subject to funding in the 4 Year Traffic Management Capital Works Budget."
One of the recommendations of the Traffic Management Study (TMS) was to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Avenue and Ayleford Drive (South).
Additional justification for the roundabout was also provided in the body of the consultant's report which stated:
"A total of 4 crashes were recorded at this 3-way junction over the five year period, only one crash (rear-end) occurred in the past 3 years. Although the crash rate of 0.6 was calculated for the five year period, this would be considerably lower when calculated for the past 3 years. However, to improve the performance of this intersection as part of the LATM measures for Giralt Road, we have recommended construction of a roundabout at this intersection"
In line with the recommendations of the TMS, a project for the installation of a roundabout at this intersection was listed in the City's 2014/15 Capital Works Program. A map showing the location of the Giralt Road/Aylesford Drive (South) intersection is shown on Attachment 1. An aerial plan showing the location of existing roundabouts along Giralt Road in relation to the proposed roundabout is shown on Attachment 2.
Detail
In 2000, the City commissioned Klyne Consultants and Wood and Grieve Engineers to undertake a traffic management study of the Marangaroo precinct. The objective of the study was to recommend a Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Strategy for the Marangaroo Precinct, which when implemented, would increase the safety of all road users and maintain the amenity for the residents living in the streets within the precinct. A sound priority system for ranking the implementation of the traffic management proposals in the various streets was also a requirement of the study.
The Study Group, comprising of elected member representatives and residents identified traffic problem areas within the Marangaroo Precinct and ranked each of the proposed traffic treatments on a priority basis. The Giralt Road/Aylesford Drive (south) roundabout ranked 10 out of the 16 traffic treatments proposed in the study.
The TMS proposed the following budget allocations:-
2000/01 $625,000
2001/02 $880,000
2002/03 $280,000
2003/04 $1,470,000
Total $3,255,000
As a result of funding constraints and other priorities in the City's past Traffic Treatments Capital Works Budgets, this schedule could not be met. A project for the installation of the roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive (south) is now listed in the City's 2014/2015 Capital Works Program.
Since the TMS was undertaken 14 years ago, the study recommendations have been reassessed with more current traffic data and crash history. The results of recent traffic counts on Giralt Road near Aylesford Drive (adjacent to Marangaroo Primary School) and on Aylesford Drive are shown in the table below:
|
Counter Location |
Date |
AWT |
Vehicles Speed (85% Speed) |
|
Giralt Road south of Aylesford Drive |
Aug 2012 |
4584 |
59km/h |
|
Giralt Road north of Aylesford Drive |
Oct 2014 |
6034 |
53km/h |
|
Aylesford Drive east of Capstone Way |
Oct 2014 |
365 |
62km/h |
As illustrated in the above table, while the traffic volume on Giralt Road has increased in the last two years, the 85th percentile speed (speed at or below which 85% of the motorists are driving) has reduced and remains relatively in line with the default residential area speed limit of 50km/hr. While the traffic volume on Aylesford Drive is very low the 85th percentile speed is slightly high. Installation of a roundabout at this intersection would primarily be to reduce speeding concerns on Giralt Road and would have minimal impact on traffic speeds in Aylesford Drive.
There had been two reported crashes in the last five years between 2009 and 2013, one requiring medical services and another non-injury minor crash.
Giralt Road is part of the Public Transport Authority (PTA) Bus Route Network and the installation of a roundabout will need to be designed to accommodate bus movements.
Consultation
As part of the Marangaroo Traffic Management Study undertaken back in 2000, a letter/questionnaire was delivered to each of the 3,372 households within the Marangaroo Precinct inviting residents to participate as a member of the Study Group and seeking information on what they considered to be traffic problem areas. A total of 115 responses were received with 28 individuals indicating that they wished to be part of the Study Group.
Consideration was given to the fact the Marangaroo Traffic Management Study and the subsequent study group deliberations were agreed upon back in May 2000. Changes in the last 14 years potentially as a result of legislations, development and/or socio economic diversity, may have impacted on traffic patterns, volumes and behaviour through this area. This could potentially alter any previously identified problems.
In July 2014, prior to implementing the works, the City undertook consultation with owners and occupiers of properties abutting the intersection (Attachment 3 refers). The concept plan sent to residents can be seen in Attachment 4. Of the seven abutting property owners and occupiers consulted, two responses were received. Both responses opposed the roundabout proposal.
Comment
Roundabouts work best in locations where the intersecting roads have similar traffic flows. In the case of the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive, the traffic on Giralt Road is far greater than Aylesford Drive. It is therefore considered that a roundabout will not be an ideal solution at this intersection in terms of traffic flow. It is also noted that the traffic pattern and driver behaviour through this section of Giralt Road appears to have changed over the period since the traffic study with the trend towards reduced speeds. The introduction of the State's default 50 km/h speed limit in built-up areas in 2001 may have influenced driver behaviour in this instance.
Giralt Road is utilised by the Public Transport Authority (PTA) as a bus route. Any roundabout constructed will need to be in accordance with PTA bus turning requirements. Roundabouts constructed to allow buses to negotiate safely through exhibit a much larger pavement area and wider through path. This being the case, the impact of the resulting deflection path on passenger cars will be very low and would therefore have reduced effect on vehicle speed reduction on everyday through traffic.
Based on the above factors, including the low crash record and opposition from the affected residents, Administration considers that the need for traffic management along this section of Giralt Road to address matters of speeding is no longer necessary. It is therefore recommended that the proposed roundabout at the Giralt Road/Aylesford Drive intersection not proceed to construction.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
A project for the installation of the roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive, Marangaroo is listed in the City's 2014/2015 Capital Works Program – Traffic Treatments (PR-2876 refers) which has a budget allocation of $200,000. Subject to Council's decision, these funds will remain unexpended and form part of surplus funds in the end of financial year position.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT PROCEED with the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive, Marangaroo; and
2. ADVISES the residents adjacent to the Giralt Road/Aylesford Drive intersection of Council's decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Location Map - Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive |
15/5634 |
|
|
2. |
Exisitng roundabouts along Giralt Road |
15/5641 |
|
|
3. |
Proposed Traffic Treatments - Giralt Road, Marangaroo |
14/145075 |
|
|
4. |
Concept Plan - Giralt Road and Aylesford Drive (south) roundabout |
15/5642 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 254
File Ref: 5597 – 14/344009
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 14
Issue
To consider the implementation of a parking strategy in the area surrounding Butler Train Station Precinct following the results of community consultation.
Background
Council at its meeting of 27 May 2014 received a Motion on Notice, MN03-05/14 - Planning for Management of Parking in the vicinity of the Butler Train Station and resolved as follows:
REQUESTS Administration to provide a report by August 2014 on a parking management strategy to address likely parking issues in the street adjoining the Butler Train Station.
Subsequent to this, Council considered Report IN04-08/14 in August 2014 on the implementation of a parking strategy which consists of parking prohibitions in conjunction with residential parking permits in the area surrounding Butler Train Station, which was not operational at the time this report was considered. Council resolved as follows:-
“1. ENDORSES a Parking Management Strategy for the Butler Train Station which incorporates time restricted parking prohibitions and residential parking permits for a 400m catchment area;
2. REQUESTS Administration to prepare Parking Prohibitions Plans for a 400m catchment area surrounding Butler Train Station and undertake community consultation to include a public meeting and written communication with the affected property owners and residents;
3. REQUESTS Administration to prepare guidelines for issuing Residential Parking Permits to the proposed parking prohibitions affected residents of the Butler train station precinct; and
4. REQUESTS Administration to submit a report to Council on the outcomes of community consultation, implementation program for the Parking Management Strategy and associated funding by December 2014.”
Attachment 1 shows a map of the area surrounding Butler Train Station.
Detail
In response to Council Resolution IN04-08/14 Item 2, Parking Prohibition plans were prepared for the 400m catchment area surrounding Butler Train Station. This catchment area was rationalised to use junctions where possible as entry/ exit points to the proposed parking area to improve motorists' awareness.
Drawing Nos 3015-2-0 (Attachment 2), 3015-3-0 (Attachment 3), 3015-4-0 (Attachment 4) and 3015-5-0 (Attachment 5) were prepared showing the proposed parking prohibition signage. Additionally, Drawing No 3015-1-0 (Attachment 6) was prepared for community consultation in order to provide the community with a clear depiction of the areas covered by the proposed parking strategy.
To reduce the installation costs, maintenance costs and visual impact, the Butler Train Station Precinct Parking Strategy was developed by incorporating the installation of area parking signage. Rather than installing the more common linear parking signage, area parking signage relies on the use of entry signage at all entry points, intermediate signs within the parking area to remind motorists they are within a parking zone and terminating signage upon leaving the parking area. The installation of these area parking signs as opposed to the more common linear parking signage requires approximately one third of the total number of signs. Attachment 7 shows examples of the three sign types.
The parking permit guidelines for Clarkson Train Station Precinct which was adopted by Council in August 2014 (Item IN05-08/14 refers) is also proposed for the Butler Train Station Precinct. Attachment 8 details the guidelines which consist of the following key restrictions:
· A maximum of two permits may be issued to the residents of a property with a single dwelling unit.
· The number of permits shall be reduced by one for each on-site garage parking space on the property.
· The residents of complexes of six or less units shall be treated the same as for single homes.
· The residents of complexes of more than six units/flats/apartments will not be issued with a permit.
In October 2014, prior to Community Consultation, Public Transport Authority (PTA) requested the City to consider the installation of parking prohibitions in Exmouth Drive to prevent the parking of vehicles in bus waiting and turning bays. The City inspected the site to assess the request and determined that parking prohibitions in these areas would be necessary regardless of the outcome of the overall Butler Train Station Precinct Parking Strategy. Drawing No 3015-5-0 (Attachment 5) shows the parking prohibitions proposed in Exmouth Drive to enable the safe operation of Transperth buses at the Butler train station.
Consultation
Community Consultation involved written notifications being sent to 845 affected residents and property owners including a Community Information Session held at John Butler Primary School on 26 November 2014. An estimated 25 residents attended the session, however only 17 residents recorded their attendance.
The information sent to residents and property owners consisted of the following items:
- Drawing of Proposed Parking Prohibition Area, Drawing No 3015-1-0 (Attachment 6)
- Covering Letter (Attachment 9)
- Residential Parking Permits - Information Sheet (Attachment 10)
- Parking Permit Eligibility Checklist (Attachment 11)
- Community Survey/Feedback Form (Attachment 12)
The information provided as part of community consultation included a drawing of the areas under consideration for parking prohibitions and the current conditions under which residential parking permits could be issued. Administration provided information sheets clearly detailing the current conditions under which residential parking permits would be issued, which included an eligibility checklist. This information was provided to enable residents to make informed decision, in particular, the restrictions associated with the issue of residential parking permits.
On the enclosed survey/feedback form (Attachment 12), the community was given the option of supporting or not supporting the proposed parking strategy including the opportunity to provide other feedback on the issue. An electronic version of this document was also available on the City's website on the 'Your Say' webpage (a link was provided to residents as part of their correspondence).
Overall, the response rate was relatively low with a total of 118 responses received. This represents 14% of the 845 letters sent to residents and property owners within the precinct. Of the responses received, opinion was equally divided with 59 responses in support and 59 responses opposing the proposed parking strategy.
A total of 70 respondents also opted to provide additional comments which are summarised below:
· 50 comments - Did not support the permit conditions
· 6 comments - Street parking not an issue at this time
· 5 comments - Station parking is adequate to meet demand
· 2 comments - More parking should be supplied at the train station
· 2 comments - Changes to proposed parking boundaries
· 2 comments - Agree with prohibitions only in business hours
· 2 comments - John Butler staff parking on-street
· 1 comment - Speeding and hooning is an issue in Butler
Based on these results, the majority of the additional feedback received related to concerns associated with the conditions placed on residential parking permits. Comments included negative feedback on both the lack of visitor permits and the restriction on issuing permits for work vehicles. Of the 50 comments relating to parking permit conditions, 13 were from respondents who gave support for the proposed parking strategy and 37 were from respondents who did not support the proposed parking strategy. It is anticipated that a large proportion of those not supporting the current parking strategy would be likely to support a parking strategy should the City be able to provide visitor permits and permits for vehicles registered to another address.
The results of community consultation are summarised in Attachment 13.
Similar issues were echoed in the Community Information Session held on Wednesday 26 November 2014. The issues raised by the community at this meeting were:
· Questions regarding work vehicles not registered to the address were the highest concern for many residents.
· Cottage block owners expressed that their homes are small and require garages for storage and use public parking embayments to park their vehicles.
· These on-street parking embayments are claimed as "for the residents".
· The current Parking and Parking Facilities Local Laws were discussed and a change to this Local Law is required to enable the issue of visitor parking permits.
· Issue of verges and parking on verges were discussed.
· Most residents wanted parking permits issued despite the total number of permits that would be issued being exceeded.
Community members in attendance were encouraged to make a formal submission of their views by submitting their survey forms or replying to the online survey through the City's 'Your Say' webpage. Minutes of this meeting are included in Attachment 14.
Comment
The feedback obtained at the Community Information Session and in the survey comments received by the City indicated that the current conditions for issuing residential parking permits are not acceptable to a large number of residents. While opinion on whether the parking strategy should be adopted was split equally, 86% of residents and property owners did not provide a response to community consultation. Administration considers that a large proportion of residents that did not respond to community consultation are likely to share the view that residential parking permit restrictions are unfavourable under the City's current Local Law. It is therefore Administration's view that while there is underlying support for a parking strategy within the Butler Train Station Precinct community, the restrictions on the issuing of residential parking permits are not popular.
The current Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law is restrictive with respect to the circumstances in which residential parking permits can be issued. Currently, permits can only be issued to residents who own a vehicle registered at the address shown on the permit application. This means that the City is currently unable to issue visitor permits or issue residential parking permits for vehicles registered to another address (such as work vehicles).
A review of the Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law is currently scheduled to be undertaken by Administration. As part of this review, it is proposed to amend the Local Law to allow the issuing of permits under much less restrictive conditions. Subject to Council's approval of these changes, the City will be able to issue parking permits for visitors and to residents with vehicles registered to another address.
Under the current Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law, it is not possible for the City to issue visitor parking permits or parking permits for vehicles registered to another address. The City's Local Law is currently under review and it is anticipated that the review and any associated changes will allow the City to issue parking permits under a much broader scope with both visitor permits and permits for vehicles registered to other addresses permitted under the new Local Law. This is in line with the feedback obtained during community consultation and it is expected that support for the parking strategy would be much higher if these changes were applied. There is an opportunity to review the parking strategy for the Butler Train Station Precinct following changes to the Local Law.
With respect to PTA's request for parking prohibitions along the section of Exmouth Drive opposite the train station, there are currently no residential properties that abut this section of Exmouth Drive. This area is required by Transperth for the safe turning and storage of buses accessing Butler train station. The installation of parking prohibitions will prevent commuter parking from interfering with the safe movement of Transperth buses operating on Exmouth Drive. Therefore, it is considered that regardless of the outcome of the overall Butler Train Station Precinct parking strategy, it is recommended that Council endorse the proposed parking prohibitions as shown in Drawing No 3015-5-0 (Attachment 5), noting that these prohibitions wont impact any residents directly.
Statutory Compliance
The following clauses from the City's Parking and Parking Facilities Local Law 2003 as amended are applicable to this report:
" Issue of Residential Parking Permits
71 (1) The local government may, on written application, issue a residential parking permit in respect of a particular vehicle to a person who is:
(a) the occupier of a dwelling house fronting a road within the parking region; and
(b) the holder of the requisite vehicle licence under the Road Traffic Act for a vehicle licensed at the address shown on the application.
(2) The residential parking permit issued by the local government may be either:
(a) an annual residential parking permit, issued for a period not in excess of one year and expiring on 31 December in the year of issue; or
(b) a temporary residential permit, issued for a period not greater than 6 months.
(3) Every residential parking permit shall specify:
(a) a permit number;
(b) the registration number of the vehicle in respect of which the permit was issued;
(c) the name of the roads or parking stations to which the exemption granted by clause 72 applies; and
(d) the date on which the permit expires.
Conditions of Exemption for Residential Parking Permits
72 Where the stopping or parking of a vehicle on any part of a road, whether marked as a parking stall or not, is prohibited for more than a specified time, or in a ticket parking or metered zone without complying with the requirements for parking in the zone, the holder of a residential parking permit is exempted from such prohibition provided that such exemption shall apply only:
(a) to the road, roads or parking station specified in the residential parking permit, and notwithstanding such specification areas of road adjacent to retail premises, where parking of all classes of vehicles is subject to time restrictions, shall be excluded from the area or areas specified as exempt;
(b) if the residential parking permit is affixed to the windscreen or a window of the vehicle in a prominent position;
(c) if the period in respect of which the residential parking permit was issued has not expired; and
(d) if the holder of the residential parking permit at the time of parking the vehicle still occupies the dwelling house in respect of which the residential parking permit was granted.
Removal of Residential Parking Permit from Vehicle
73 The holder of a residential parking permit on ceasing to occupy the dwelling house in respect of which the permit was issued shall remove the residential parking permit from the vehicle to which it is affixed.
Fees for Residential Parking Permits
74 The fees payable for residential parking permits shall, in accordance with section 6.16 of the Act, be such fees as shall be set by a resolution of local government."
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“3 Economy - Progressive, connected communities that enable economic growth and employment.
3.3 Easy to Get Around - The community is well connected and accessible with an integrated transport approach for all.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
The provision of parking prohibitions incurs not only the initial cost of materials and installation of the signs but also the ongoing cost of maintenance due to vandalism and graffiti. The estimated cost of materials and labour to install the parking prohibitions proposed in Drawings 3015-2-0, 3015-3-0, 3015-4-0 and 3015-5-0 (a total of 135 signs) is $27,000. This exceeds the uncommitted funding of $17,000 available from PR-2657 – Parking Scheme Signage and Line Marking in the 2014/2015 Capital Works Program.
Subject to Council's decision and if the Parking Prohibition are approved, the additional funding of $10,000 would need to be sourced within the 2015/16 Capital Works Program and the installation would occur from July 2015 onwards.
The estimated cost of materials and labour to install signage only in Exmouth Drive, as shown on Drawing 3015-5-0 (a total of 8 signs), is $1,600, which can be accommodated from PR-2567.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. DOES NOT PROCEED with the proposed Butler Train Station Precinct parking strategy consisting of the installation of parking prohibitions as shown in Drawing Nos 3015-2-0, 3015-3-0 and 3015-4-0 and the issuing of residential parking permits;
2. APPROVES the installation of parking prohibitions on Exmouth Drive as shown in Drawing No 3015-5-0 to facilitate the safe operation and movements of Transperth buses at the Butler train station; and
3. ADVISES community consultation respondents of Council's Decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Local Area Map |
15/3623 |
|
|
2. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibitions Drawing No 3015-2-0 |
15/28556 |
|
|
3. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibitions Drawing No 3015-3-0 |
15/28557 |
|
|
4. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibitions Drawing No 3015-4-0 |
15/28558 |
|
|
5. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibitions Drawing No 3015-5-0 |
15/28559 |
|
|
6. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibitions Drawing No 3015-1-0 |
15/28555 |
|
|
7. |
Butler Train Station Precinct - Parking Prohibition Sign Design |
14/327800 |
|
|
8. |
Residential Parking Permit Guidelines |
15/31042 |
|
|
9. |
Community Consultation - Proposed Parking Prohibitions Letter to Residents (14/264502) |
15/3543 |
|
|
10. |
Community Consultation - Residential Parking Permit Information Sheet (14/313806) |
15/3546 |
|
|
11. |
Community Consultation - Checklist for the application for a Residential Parking Permit (14/313811) |
15/3551 |
|
|
12. |
Community Consultation - Consultation Form Butler Train Station Parking Strategy (14/31395) |
15/3553 |
|
|
13. |
Community Consultation - Community Feedback Charts |
15/2241 |
|
|
14. |
Community Consultation - Community Information Session Minutes |
15/26515 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 277
3.19 Abbotswood Drive, Landsdale - Proposed Traffic Management Scheme - Community Consultation Results
File Ref: 3125V02 – 15/17572
Responsible Officer: A/Director Infrastructure
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the results of community consultation for the proposed implementation of a Traffic Management Scheme along Abbotswood Drive, Landsdale.
Background
Council at its meeting of 7 February 2012 considered a report investigating the impact of the Mirrabooka Avenue extension, from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road on vehicle movements within the Locality of Landsdale and resolved in part as follows;
“That Council:-
1. NOTES that Administration will develop a traffic management plan for Abbotswood Drive and report the results of community consultation based on that plan to Council within the next 12 months;”
A location map of the subject site is shown as Attachment 1.
Detail
A Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) for Abbotswood Drive was developed and subsequently sent to residents to ascertain the level of community support for the proposal. Refer to Attachment 2 for the TMS drawing. In developing a cost effective traffic management plan for community consultation, Administration considered the following aspects:-
· Road function and configuration;
· Intersections;
· Crossovers;
· Pathways;
· Lighting;
· Traffic treatment spacing; and
· Bus routes
Road function, Intersections and Crossovers
Abbotswood Drive is a 7.5m wide single carriageway contained within a 20m wide road reserve. This road is classified as a Local Distributor Road, in accordance with the City's Functional Road Hierarchy. Abbotswood Drive is 780m long and has curved and steep sections of road along its length between Kingsway and The Broadview.
There are seven intersections in close proximity to each other, along the entire length of Abbotswood Drive. The majority of the property frontages are less than 20 metres and the typical crossover width for each property is in the order 6 metres. The close proximity of the various intersections compounded by the numerous crossovers along Abbotswood Drive and the curve nature of the road has somewhat limited the opportunity to suitably locate traffic treatment devices. Additionally, Main Roads WA also requires that speed cushions are located at least 20 metres from an intersection.
All the above factors have precluded the use of traffic treatments options such as speed humps and speed cushions (vertical displacement devices) and blister islands and chicanes (horizontal displacement devices).
The traffic treatment proposed, in this instance, is the use of intersection plateaus to both facilitate speed reduction without displacing traffic onto other local roads and to better highlight the presence of an approaching intersection. The installation of speed plateaus have been proven to be effective in reducing vehicle speeds, such as, along Ashley Road in Tapping.
Three intersection plateaus are proposed along Abbotswood Drive. These are located at Stonewall Circuit (West), Strathpine Chase and Wexford Meander. These intersection have been selected with consideration to existing infrastructure such as stormwater drainage pits and street lighting.
Street Lighting
To ensure that traffic treatments are observable at night, the Australian Standard for street lighting (AS1158 Section 3.2.6.1) states the following (in part);
"The intention of the lighting associated with the device is to alert the driver approaching at a speed too high to safely pass through the device of both the presence and nature of the device so that the driver can adjust speed accordingly.
To achieve this each device shall be provided with an illumination of not less than 3.5 lux, in addition to the general road lighting, over the relevant design area."
The installation of any traffic treatment device therefore needs to take into consideration the location of existing street lighting and the need to upgrade its lighting output.
Intersections are generally lit to a relatively high standard at the time of subdivision. The street lighting at these locations is already close to the 3.5 lux standard required for traffic treatment devices. As a result, the installation of intersection plateaus require only minimal upgrading/adjustment to the existing street lighting at the intersections.
In instances where traffic treatment devices are proposed at mid-block locations, there will be significant costs incurred in order to upgrade existing street lighting or the installation of new street lighting to satisfy the 3.5 lux standard required by Main Roads WA.
Traffic Treatment Spacing
To ensure that the desired effect of installing traffic management is achieved, it is important that the relative distance between devices is kept constant. If the treatments are placed too close, drivers may become frustrated and seek alternative routes through local access streets or engage in anti-social behaviour. If the treatments are placed too far apart, the overall effect will be lost and drivers will accelerate/decelerate between devices.
Bus routes
Abbotswood Drive is part of the Public Transport Authority (PTA) bus route network and the installation of any traffic treatment devices along Abbotswood Drive would need to accommodate the passage of PTA buses for its entire length. It should be noted that in cases where roads are listed as being part of a PTA bus route, the effectiveness of any proposed traffic management scheme is less effective due to the need to accommodate for buses.
Consultation
A survey letter was sent out on 11 August 2014 to 69 owners and occupiers of properties abutting Abbotswood Drive to ascertain the opinion of the residents affected by the proposal. (Attachment 3 refers). The survey was completed on 1 September 2014.
There were 23 responses received (33% response rate), 22 respondents were in favour with one resident opposing the proposal.
Comment
In developing the Abbotswood Drive TMS for community consultation, consideration was given to all existing infrastructure and the road configuration and geometry. The installation of intersection plateaus is generally an expensive traffic calming measure, which is only considered once all other traffic calming measures have been ruled out. Speed plateaus require significant adjustments to existing road infrastructure and have a major impact on residents who access their properties at intersections during the construction period.
The construction time for each plateau can take between 4-8 weeks. The City will need to liaise closely with PTA to ensure that buses are able to be diverted while the plateaus are being installed. These diversions will temporarily burden residents who utilise public transport on a daily basis. The adjoining residences affected by the construction of the intersection plateaus will also need to be closely consulted during the construction period.
The consultation period in August 2014 received a response rate of 33% which is considered to be a good representation of the community's view. The overwhelming support received from 22 of the 23 respondents is a positive indicator that the community is in favour of the proposed TMS.
In reviewing the comments made by the community, it is evident that the community is concerned with speeding and hooning along Abbotswood Drive, particularly in the mornings and evenings. Given that Abbotswood Drive is a PTA bus route, the ramps on the approaches to the intersection plateaus will need to be graded to accord with PTA requirements. This may have the impact of reducing the effectiveness of the proposed intersection plateaus. Nevertheless, it is considered that the three intersection plateaus proposed would be an effective measure in addressing the residents' concerns.
Two out of 11 residents responded for the section of Abbotswood Drive between The Broadview and Wexford Meander requesting additional traffic calming measures in this section. Administration considers that additional traffic calming is not required at this stage.
There is difficulty in locating a speed cushion mid block between The Broadview and Wexford Meander due to the close proximity of the many crossovers situated at this location. The installation of additional street lighting and associated cost will also need to be considered. It is recommended that the traffic behaviour be monitored through traffic counts along this section of road following the completion of the TMS to determine the need for further traffic calming measures.
All respondents but one were in support of the TMS presented. The one resident who objected, requested traffic signals along Abbotswood Drive. Administration does not support the request for the installation of traffic signals at intersections of Local Distributor Roads with local access roads.
Based on the support from majority of the respondents, it is recommended that the TMS be approved with no changes made to the scheme as proposed in City's Drawing No. 3003-1-0 (Attachment 2).
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.3 Safe Communities - We feel safe at home and in our local area.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There is no funding allocation in the City's current 10-Year Capital Works Program for the installation of the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Abbotswood Drive. The cost to implement the proposed Traffic Management Scheme is estimated at $350,000.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Abbotswood Drive as detailed in the City's Drawing No. 3003-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
2. LISTS an amount of $350,000 within in the City's 10 year Capital Works Program for the proposed Traffic Management Scheme along Abbotswood Drive as detailed in the City's Drawing No. 3003-1-0 (Attachment 2 refers).
3. ADVISES the residents of Abbotswood Drive of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Abbotswood Drive - Locality Plan |
15/17576 |
|
|
2. |
Abbotswood Drive - Drawing No 3003-1-0 |
15/17586 |
Minuted |
|
3. |
Abbotswood Drive - Community Consultation Letter & Survey |
15/17579 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 285
Community Development
Community Programs and Services
File Ref: 13465 – 15/40266
Responsible Officer: Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the preliminary cost estimate for the proposed Ridgewood Reserve Changerooms Extension project (the Project).
Background
At the City of Wanneroo Annual General Meeting of Electors (AGM) held on 2 December 2014, the following Motion was tabled in relation to the Project:
“4. That the City of Wanneroo include in their 2015/16 budget considerations, the extension of the Ridgewood Reserve Club rooms to include a function/meeting room and storage facility to accommodate the growing needs of the well-established clubs already utilising the existing facility.”
As a result of the Motion being tabled, Administration provided the following response:
“Administration has previously provided a cost estimate to the Quinns Amateur Football Club (the Club) for the provision of an extension of this type (based on a total building footprint of 268m2) at a total estimated cost of $800,000 (as at March 2014). This extension is inclusive of a function room, equipment store, toilets, cleaners store and an external veranda.
At the time of providing this information to the Club, Administration advised that a one third contribution would be required from the Club, as the requested facility provision is above current City of Wanneroo standard level of provision. It should be noted that Council considered report CD03-10/14 at its meeting held on 14 October 2014, in relation to the provision of a 100m2 extension to the existing Oldham Reserve Change rooms. As a result, Council resolved to support the extension of this facility without the need for a one-third contribution from benefiting Clubs, acknowledging that the provision of the 100m2 extension of this nature was now part of the standard facility requirements of local clubs.
It should be noted that any facility provision beyond the 100m2 is not considered to be standard provision, and as such will require a one-third contribution from benefiting clubs.
On this basis, Administration will list the provision of a 100m2 multi-purpose room extension to the Ridgewood Reserve Change rooms in the draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget.
As per the advice provided in relation to Item 2, there is no capacity within the current draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget to undertake this project in the 2015/16 financial year, as the resources required to progress the project are architectural in nature and the City's existing resources in this area are fully committed in the delivery of existing projects, including the delivery of the Koondoola Community Centre, Pearsall Hocking Community Centre, Oldham Reserve Changeroom extension, Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex Soccer Changerooms, Jimbub Reserve Changerooms, Kingsway Baseball Clubrooms and Riverlinks Park Sports Amenities Building. Should this project be brought forward, a project of a similar nature will need to be delayed. “
At its meeting held on 3 February 2015, Council considered the Motions presented to the AGM (report CS05-02/15) and, in respect to the Motion put forward regarding the Project, resolved that:
“4. REQUEST Administration to note the request to construct a function/meeting room and storage facility as an extension to the existing Ridgewood Reserve Change rooms as a part of the development of the draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Program; and
5. REQUEST Administration to provide a report at the next council meeting listing the composition of the preliminary cost estimate for the $800,000 proposed extension.”
Detail
The cost estimate noted for the Project in response to the Motion put at the AGM was developed as an outcome of a meeting held between the Mayor, representatives of the Quinns Districts Amateur Football Club (the Club) and Administration held in July 2013. The cost estimate was based on a general layout comprising of the following areas:
|
Room Name |
Total Area (m2) |
|
Function Room |
148 |
|
Equipment Store |
16 |
|
Toilets |
31 |
|
Cleaners Store |
3 |
|
External Veranda |
70 |
|
Total Area |
268m2 |
As a result, Administration wrote to the Club on 6 March 2014 (Attachment 1), outlining the cost the proposed extension had been estimated at being $782,667, which for budgeting purposes had been rounded up to $800,000. The correspondence to the Club also outlined the funding model for projects of this type and the project's priority.
The detail of the cost estimate is as follows:
|
Item |
Quantity |
Rate |
Total |
Note |
|
Demolition/Removals |
_ |
_ |
$ 5,000 |
|
|
Site/Civil/Landscape |
_ |
_ |
$ 25,000 |
No scope- Allowance only |
|
External Verandah (1) |
80 |
$ 400.0 |
$ 32,000 |
|
|
Total External Works |
m2 |
|
$ 62,000 |
|
|
New Building Extension |
198 |
$ 2,500.0 |
$ 495,000 |
|
|
Total Building Works |
278 |
|
$ 495,000 |
|
|
Subtotal 1 |
|
|
$ 557,000 |
|
|
Cost Escalation 2 year |
|
6.0% |
$ 33,420 |
|
|
Subtotal 2 |
|
|
$ 590,420 |
|
|
Consultancy Services |
|
10.0% |
$ 59,042 |
|
|
Energy Efficiency and ESD Initiatives |
|
5.0% |
$ 29,521 |
|
|
Artworks |
|
2.0% |
$ 11,808 |
|
|
Furniture - Loose |
_ |
_ |
_ |
Not allowed |
|
Furniture - Outdoor |
_ |
_ |
_ |
Not allowed |
|
Temporary Facilities Hire/Purchase |
_ |
_ |
_ |
Not allowed |
|
Subtotal 3 |
|
|
$ 690,791 |
|
|
Contingency Total |
|
10.0% |
$ 69,079 |
|
|
Subtotal 4 |
|
|
$ 759,871 |
|
|
Project Management |
|
3.0% |
$ 22,796 |
|
|
Total Project |
|
|
$ 782,667 |
Note: (1) In correspondence to the Club the total area of the verandah was listed as 70 m2. The cost impact of an increase to 80m2 is $4,000.
It should be noted that this estimate is preliminary only (otherwise known as an Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate), based on industry rates and Administration's experience with similar projects. The estimate has been developed to inform the development of a funding model for the project and to inform budget development. On this basis the estimate carries an accuracy of -10% to +25%. A cost estimate for construction purposes requires detailed design to be completed, which in turn, requires a confirmed design budget and funding model.
Clarification of the items listed above is provided as follows:
|
Key Task |
Description |
|
Demolition/Removals & Reinstatements |
Demolition and removal of any existing parts of the building or surrounds as required to facilitate construction. Provisional sum is based on an estimate taking into account previous works of this type. |
|
Site/Civil/Landscape |
Allowance for possible work to prepare the site for construction. Provisional sum is based on an estimate taking into account previous works of this type. |
|
External Veranda |
Allowance for extension of the existing veranda based on industry construction costs for buildings of a similar nature (Rawlinsons Construction Handbook). |
|
New Building Extension & Verandah |
Estimate based on industry construction costs for buildings of a similar nature (Rawlinsons Construction Handbook). |
|
Cost Escalation |
As per 2013 Building Index estimates (Rawlinsons Construction Handbook). To allow for cost increases to construction tender. |
|
Consultancy Services |
Allowance for design and engineering consultancy services. Based on 10% of construction costs as per industry standards. |
|
Energy Efficiency and ESD Initiatives |
Allowance for the inclusion of energy efficiency measures and environmentally sensitive design. |
|
Artworks |
Allowance of 2% as per the City's existing Arts Management and Development Policy. |
|
Contingency |
Allowance for unforseen costs associated with design and construction components of the project. Based on construction industry quantity surveying practices. |
|
Project Management |
Internal cost recovery of City of Wanneroo Infrastructure Directorate resource costs. |
Consultation
Consultation has occurred with the Club as per the meeting held in July 2013 and the subsequent correspondence to the Club, dated 6 March 2014 (Attachment 1).
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
It should be noted that, should this project proceed, Administration will be required to gain the required statutory approvals, permits and certificates, as they relate to Development Approval, Building Permits and Occupancy Permits, and also ensure that matters pertaining to Aboriginal Heritage, Environmental Approvals etc. are adequately investigated and addressed.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
It should be noted that no funds for this project are listed in the City's 2014/15 10 Year Capital Works Budget. Should this project proceed, separate budget allocations will be required within the draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget for design development (10% of the total project cost) and construction. Based on the preliminary estimate this equates to the following budget allocations over a three year period:
|
Year |
Description |
Budget |
|
1 |
Detailed Design |
$60,000 |
|
2-3 |
Construction |
$722,667 |
The cost estimate should be revised to inform the budget items listed above. As outlined in the Administration response to the Motion, resource capacity to undertake the project also needs to be taken into consideration.
At this point, the provision of a 100m2 multi-purpose extension only to the Ridgewood Reserve Changerooms at a cost of $390,000 has been included for consideration in the draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget. This is based on Council's decision in relation to the Oldham Reserve Changeroom extension (report CD 03-10/14), where Council resolved to support the provision of a 100m2 extension to this facility at no cost to the benefiting Clubs, acknowledging that the provision of an 100m2 extension of this nature was now part of the standard facility requirements of the Club. On this basis any facility provision beyond the 100m2 extension is not considered to be standard provision, and as such will require a one-third contribution from benefiting clubs.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the composition of the preliminary cost estimate of $800,000 (rounded up from $782,667 for budgeting purposes) for the proposed 278m2 function room extension to the existing Ridgewood Reserve Changerooms, as outlined in the floor plan provided in Attachment 1; and
2. NOTES that the provision of a 100m2 multi-purpose room extension only, for the Ridgewood Reserve Changerooms has been listed for consideration in the draft 2015/16 10 Year Capital Works Budget, based on Council's decision in relation to the Oldham Reserve Changeroom Extension Project (CD03-10/14) at an estimated budget of $390,000.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Quinns Districts Amateur FC - Ridgewood Changeroom Extension 6 March 2014 |
15/40669 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 293
File Ref: 5644 – 15/2173
Responsible Officer: Director Community Development
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider the renewal of the partnership agreement with Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka Inc.
Background
The City of Wanneroo (the City) and Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka Inc. (Edmund Rice) have been in partnership to deliver sport based programs throughout the City and emerging areas since 2011. These programs are primarily focussed on suburbs with high Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CaLD) and indigenous populations.
Edmund Rice is responsible for the coordination and delivery of these programs as well as assisting the City through delivery and/or support of other youth programs and events. The City agrees to provide in-kind support through venues, staff support and promotion of the programs.
The renewal of the agreement is being presented to Council for endorsement as the value of the City's support through subsidised use is in excess of the $500 maximum limit of the Chief Executive Officer's delegated authority.
Detail
The current agreement was reviewed by both parties by November 2014.
The objectives of this agreement are as follows:
· Increase access to sport and recreation programs within the City of Wanneroo;
· Increase the participation rate of the primary target group in sport and active recreation activities in the City of Wanneroo;
· Increase the utilisation rate by the primary target group of existing mainstream sport and active recreation facilities and programs in the City of Wanneroo;
· Increase the capacity of existing service providers to respond effectively to the needs of the primary target group, in accessing sport and active recreation activities;
· Pilot sport and active recreation pathway programs within the City of Wanneroo; and
· Provide leadership and mentoring to Youth Sport Leaders.
The City of Wanneroo has proposed a number of changes to the new agreement (Attachment 1). The new agreement proposes that the City of Wanneroo will:
· Provide five (previously ten) ad hoc bookings to City of Wanneroo venues each year subject to availability and with consideration to existing facility user groups, and as approved by the Manager Community Programs and Services. Bookings to be negotiated on a case by case basis; and
· Any alterations or extension of hours, require a minimum of 14 (previously 7) working days notice and must be requested in writing via the partnership contact person before Coordinator/Manager approval.
These changes have been proposed to enable the effective management of the program's booking requirements, as well as existing bookings.
This report recommends that the agreement be continued with the next review to occur in November 2015.
Consultation
Consultation has been conducted through the City of Wanneroo Youth Services team and the Edmund Rice Programs Coordinator, with all parties aware of the above changes.
Comment
The partnership between the City of Wanneroo and Edmund Rice has proven to be valuable to the City and its residents, with an average of 100 young people accessing the services weekly. Recent changes within the program have seen a greater focus on engagement with CaLD, Indigenous and female young people between the ages of 5-21.
Through these sports programs, the City of Wanneroo has experienced an increase in interest in its youth centre and school holiday programs. These programs have also seen positive outcomes such as the development of leadership, coaching and management skills, increased physical activity and increased friendships. Sporting clubs have also benefited from this program as interested young people have been provided with information and linked in to a variety of different sporting clubs.
Statutory Compliance
Council endorsement of the proposed partnership agreement is required due to the value of City's support through subsidised use in excess of the $500 maximum limit of the Chief Executive's delegated authority for waiver of fees.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.1 Great Places and Quality Lifestyle - People from different cultures find Wanneroo an exciting place to live with quality facilities and services.”
2.2 Healthy and active people – We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.
"4 Civic Leadership- Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working with others – The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works in partnership with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes."
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The City of Wanneroo agrees to provide Edmund Rice subsidised usage of the following facilities for the 2015 calendar year.
|
|
Date |
Times |
Facility Booking |
|
Butterworth Park Koondoola |
Tuesdays 13 Jan – 15 Dec 2015 |
4:15pm – 6:15pm |
Oval
Basketball Courts |
|
Hainsworth Park Girrawheen |
Wednesdays 1 Apr - 23 Sep 2015
14 Jan – 9 Dec 2015 |
4:15pm – 6:15pm
4.15pm - 6.15pm |
Oval
Netball/Basketball Courts |
|
Peridot Park Basketball Courts
Banksia Grove
|
Saturdays 7 Feb – 12 Dec 2015 |
9:45am – 12:15pm |
Hard Court 1 and Hard Court 2 |
|
Kingsbridge Amphitheatre Butler |
Fridays 16 Jan – 11 Dec 2015 |
7:00pm - 9:00pm |
Amphitheatre
Tennis Courts |
|
Butler Community Centre Butler |
Fridays 16 Jan – 11 Dec 2015 |
4:45pm – 6:45pm |
Activity Room 2 |
The value of the subsidised use for the 2015 calendar year is estimated at $8,500.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the continuation of the partnership agreement between the City of Wanneroo and the Edmund Rice Centre Mirrabooka Inc., as detailed in Attachment 1, for the use of the Butler Community Centre, Kingsbridge Park Amphitheatre, Butterworth Park, Hainsworth Park and Peridot Park to deliver sports based programs for young people at risk and associated activities, for the period of one year from February 2015; and
2. AUTHORISES the CEO or his nominee to sign the agreement on behalf of the City of Wanneroo.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Edmund Rice Partnership Agreement 2015 |
14/308906 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 300
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 1859 – 15/31248
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of January 2015, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in January 2015:
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – January 2015 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
100606 - 100987 2140 - 2159 |
$1,430,305.09 $8,484,290,38 $9,914,595.47
($4,506.78) ($50,486.01) ($9,859,602.68) |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – January 2015 Municipal Fund Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,859,602.68 $41,084.98 $3,243,569.61 $13,144,257.27 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – January 2015 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 Berkley TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$722.23 $722.23 $722.22 $10,395.63 $16,607.02 $722.22 $722.22 $16,607.02 $1,087.02 $2,178.20 $50,486.01 |
At the close of January 2015 outstanding creditors amounted to $208,687.76. The cheque totals of $1,430,305.09 included a prior month system adjustment of $2,667.10.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payments (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of January 2015 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
Management Systems Effectiveness Rating |
|
Warrant of Payments Information Only |
Low |
Satisfactory |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
|
Manager Finance |
Accept |
|
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of January 2015, as summarised below:-
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – January 2015 Cheque Numbers Cheque error with IT EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
100606 - 100987 100496 2140 - 2159 |
$1,430,305.09 $2,667.10 $8,484,290,38 $9,914,595.47
($4,506.78) ($50,486.01) ($9,859,602.68) |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – January 2015 Municipal Fund Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$9,859,602.68 $41,084.98 $3,243,569.61 $13,144,257.27 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – January 2015 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 Berkley TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$722.23 $722.23 $722.22 $10,395.63 $16,607.02 $722.22 $722.22 $16,607.02 $1,087.02 $2,178.20 $50,486.01 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS JANUARY 2015 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00100606 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$276.42 |
|
00100607 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$17.15 |
|
00100608 |
06/01/2015 |
Suzanne Apps-Jackson |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Dog Registration - Sterilisation |
|
|
00100609 |
06/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Districts Rugby Union Club |
$1,584.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00100610 |
06/01/2015 |
Barbara Durham |
$41.70 |
|
|
|
Refund - 1 Month Membership Payment - Aquamotion |
|
|
00100611 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$2,272.72 |
|
00100612 |
06/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Agricultural Society (Incorporated) |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Overpaid Street Trading Licence Daily/Trader Fee For Wanneroo Show 5 Traders @ $16 X 2 Days - Overcharged |
|
|
00100613 |
06/01/2015 |
Biosystems 2000 Pty Ltd |
$118.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Septic Tank Application Fee - Cancellation Of Application |
|
|
00100614 |
06/01/2015 |
National Lifestyle Village Pty Ltd |
$9,265.59 |
|
|
|
Refund Portion Of Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No.140 To District Planning Scheme No.2 - Lots 4 & 5 Mornington Drive Mariginiup |
|
|
00100615 |
06/01/2015 |
P Khong |
$75.60 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Credits Due To Not Re-Enrolling - Swim School |
|
|
00100616 |
06/01/2015 |
L McLeod |
$14.70 |
|
|
|
Refund Swimming Lessons Term 1 2015 |
|
|
00100617 |
06/01/2015 |
N Martin |
$117.60 |
|
|
|
Refund Swimming Lessons Term 1 2015 |
|
|
00100618 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$527.18 |
|
00100619 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$232.69 |
|
00100620 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$401.50 |
|
00100621 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$972.93 |
|
00100622 |
06/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$3,970.08 |
|
00100623 |
06/01/2015 |
Andrea Rose |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100624 |
06/01/2015 |
Hocking Primary School |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100625 |
06/01/2015 |
Vietnamese Culture Association Incorporated |
$1,395.55 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100626 |
06/01/2015 |
Dale Alcock Homes |
$339.09 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Overpayment Of Development Application Fees |
|
|
00100627 |
06/01/2015 |
Building Better Communities |
$421.40 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00100628 |
06/01/2015 |
Meinhardt |
$618.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Overpayment Of Development Application Fees |
|
|
00100629 |
06/01/2015 |
C S Heap |
$92.10 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Portion Of The Fees Not Expended Assessing Amendment No 131 To Districts Planning Scheme No 2 |
|
|
00100630 |
06/01/2015 |
Charlene Marie Holmes |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100631 |
06/01/2015 |
Kristin Jones |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100632 |
06/01/2015 |
Rhonda Marinovich |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100633 |
06/01/2015 |
Lynne McCrindle |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100634 |
06/01/2015 |
Chad & Jarna Wright |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100635 |
06/01/2015 |
Sabrina Moro |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100636 |
06/01/2015 |
Saurabh Bhatt |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100637 |
06/01/2015 |
Karla Stean |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100638 |
06/01/2015 |
Mia Treg |
$146.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100639 |
06/01/2015 |
Everett Bennet Pty Ltd |
$81.46 |
|
|
|
Refund For Overpayment Of Codes Variation Fee - Lot 1428 Quayside Avenue Alkimos |
|
|
00100640 |
06/01/2015 |
Vodafone Pty Ltd |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100641 |
06/01/2015 |
Silver Chain |
$192.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100642 |
06/01/2015 |
Lisa Te Aho |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Payment Made In Error |
|
|
00100643 |
06/01/2015 |
Shu Wei Chu |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Payment Made In Error |
|
|
00100644 |
06/01/2015 |
Stephanie Parkin |
$173.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Existing Structure Application Fee |
|
|
00100645 |
06/01/2015 |
Football West Limited |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 5 X Members In Their Participation At The 2014 NTC Challenge Tournament Which Was Held In Canberra On The 01.12.2014 |
|
|
00100646 |
06/01/2015 |
Richard Johnston |
$17.60 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Staff CPR Requalification |
|
|
00100647 |
06/01/2015 |
ATI Martial Arts |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 3 X Members In Their Participation At The STA Australian National Championships Held In Adelaide 06 - 07.12.2014 |
|
|
00100648 |
06/01/2015 |
Ice Synchro |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship For 3 X Members To Participation At The Australian Figure Skating Championships Held In Brisbane 25.11.2014 - 03.12.2014 |
|
|
00100649 |
06/01/2015 |
Peard Lawrence Real Estate Joondalup |
$410.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100650 |
06/01/2015 |
Philip Milton |
$441.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
|
00100651 |
06/01/2015 |
De Freitas and Ryan Property Consultants |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100652 |
06/01/2015 |
Guardian Exercise |
$370.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Insurance Membership Invoice 152969 - Refused The Insurance Membership |
|
|
00100653 |
06/01/2015 |
Handle Realty |
$85.04 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100654 |
06/01/2015 |
Miss Natasha Buckley |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Development Application Fees - Swimming Pool And Fence |
|
|
00100655 |
06/01/2015 |
Sunny Jim's Mobile Wood Fired Pizza |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Trading In Public Places Daily Fees Trader Included In A Collective Trading License For The Event |
|
|
00100656 |
06/01/2015 |
Central City Church |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100657 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100658 |
06/01/2015 |
Acts Christian Church |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100659 |
06/01/2015 |
Michael Uy |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100660 |
06/01/2015 |
Melissa Pyle |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100661 |
06/01/2015 |
New Life Christian Centre Incorporated |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100662 |
06/01/2015 |
Valued Independent People Incorporated |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100663 |
06/01/2015 |
Phyllis Brown |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100664 |
06/01/2015 |
Kevin Francis |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100665 |
06/01/2015 |
Elisa Levinson |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100666 |
06/01/2015 |
The Salvation Army |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100667 |
06/01/2015 |
Danijela Volarevic |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100668 |
06/01/2015 |
Tomas Ludvar |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100669 |
06/01/2015 |
Energylite Pty Ltd |
$300.60 |
|
|
|
Partial Refund Of Building Application Fees |
|
|
00100670 |
06/01/2015 |
Energylite Pty Ltd |
$301.44 |
|
|
|
Partial Refund Of Building Application Fee |
|
|
00100671 |
06/01/2015 |
Adam Vardy |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100672 |
06/01/2015 |
Mrs Shirley Mary Liebl |
$26.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Double Payment Made To HACC Account - Finance |
|
|
00100673 |
06/01/2015 |
Manor Home Builders |
$2,761.85 |
|
|
|
Refund - Partial Development Application Fees |
|
|
00100674 |
06/01/2015 |
Mrs Jodie Michael |
$363.82 |
|
|
|
Refund - Term 1 2015 Swimming Lessons - Relocation For Work |
|
|
00100675 |
06/01/2015 |
Heritage Realty Pty Ltd |
$450.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100676 |
06/01/2015 |
Quinns Rocks 3 Year Old Programme |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100677 |
06/01/2015 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Petty |
$303.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100678 |
06/01/2015 |
Alinta Gas |
$2,028.86 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
9 X Financial Assistance $1,993.36 |
|
|
00100679 |
06/01/2015 |
Aquamotion Office Petty Cash |
$222.50 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100680 |
06/01/2015 |
Landgate |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Notification Under Section 70A - 23 Civic Drive Wanneroo - Property |
|
|
00100681 |
06/01/2015 |
Fines Enforcement Registry |
$1,770.80 |
|
|
|
Lodgement Of 38 Infringement Notices Records With The Fines Enforcement Agency - Regulatory Services |
|
|
00100682 |
06/01/2015 |
Stephen Napier Freeborn |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Support |
|
|
00100683 |
06/01/2015 |
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash |
$105.10 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100684 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100685 |
06/01/2015 |
Water Corporation |
$62,725.45 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
3 X Financial Assistance $905.00 |
|
|
|
|
Sewerage Manhole Fee - Ashbrook - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Lower Pipes - Baltimore Parade - Projects |
|
|
00100686 |
06/01/2015 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Library Petty Cash |
$62.30 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100687 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100688 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100689 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100690 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100691 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100692 |
06/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100693 |
06/01/2015 |
Synergy |
$47,174.39 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
8 X Financial Assistance $1,775.49 |
|
|
00100694 |
06/01/2015 |
Telstra |
$114,091.66 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
3 X Financial Assistance $642.07 |
|
|
|
|
Asset Relocation/Impact Study - Lenore Road - Projects $90,836.69 |
|
|
00100695 |
06/01/2015 |
Department of Housing |
$543.70 |
|
|
|
2 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100696 |
06/01/2015 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$49.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100697 |
06/01/2015 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$1,271.15 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100698 |
06/01/2015 |
Healthy Communities Program Petty Cash |
$133.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100699 |
06/01/2015 |
Mr Terence Williams |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
00100700 |
08/01/2015 |
Commonwealth Bank Wanneroo |
$50,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bank Cheque - Yanchep Lagoon Cafe Compensation And Legal Fees As Agreed - Property |
|
|
00100701 |
13/01/2015 |
Cr D M Newton |
$4,315.62 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00100702 |
13/01/2015 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00100703 |
13/01/2015 |
Foo Hua Chinese Restaurant |
$1,473.60 |
|
|
|
Catering - Fires Various Dates - Emergency Services |
|
|
00100704 |
13/01/2015 |
Landsdale Forum Drycleaners |
$308.50 |
|
|
|
Drycleaning Services - Emergency Services |
|
|
00100705 |
13/01/2015 |
State Library of WA |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges |
|
|
00100706 |
16/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100707 |
20/01/2015 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Petty |
$272.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100708 |
20/01/2015 |
Alinta Gas |
$536.00 |
|
|
|
2 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100709 |
20/01/2015 |
Accounts Services Petty Cash |
$459.50 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100710 |
20/01/2015 |
Fines Enforcement Registry |
$1,770.80 |
|
|
|
Lodgement Of 38 Infringement Notices - Regulatory Services |
|
|
00100711 |
20/01/2015 |
Stephen Napier Freeborn |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
00100712 |
20/01/2015 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$39.50 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100713 |
20/01/2015 |
Honeywell Secondhand Shop |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100714 |
20/01/2015 |
Optus |
$26,734.05 |
|
|
|
Relocation Of Optus Asset On The West Side Of The Proposed Flynn Drive New Realignment - Projects |
|
|
00100715 |
20/01/2015 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$143.45 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100716 |
20/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$26.30 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100717 |
20/01/2015 |
Synergy |
$36,349.15 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
00100718 |
20/01/2015 |
Telstra |
$30,882.36 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00100719 |
20/01/2015 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$59.45 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100720 |
20/01/2015 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$289.55 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100721 |
20/01/2015 |
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash |
$250.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100722 |
21/01/2015 |
Magistrates Court |
$268.75 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
00100723 |
21/01/2015 |
Amanda Stroud |
$132.30 |
|
|
|
Refund Term 1 2015 Swimming Lesson Due To Moving Interstate |
|
|
00100724 |
22/01/2015 |
All Things Theatre |
$2,715.90 |
|
|
|
Molton Drapes - Museums |
|
|
00100725 |
22/01/2015 |
Archive Management Company (Qld) Pty |
$183.50 |
|
|
|
Standard File Box - IM |
|
|
00100726 |
22/01/2015 |
Australian War Memorial |
$164.00 |
|
|
|
Publication Items - Heritage |
|
|
00100727 |
22/01/2015 |
Balga Job Link Incorporated |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Job Application - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
00100728 |
22/01/2015 |
Baycorp (WA) Pty Ltd |
$1,200.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Property |
|
|
00100729 |
22/01/2015 |
Boya Equipment |
$326.36 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Parks |
|
|
00100730 |
22/01/2015 |
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore |
$824.94 |
|
|
|
Digital Camera & Memory Card - IT |
|
|
|
|
Apple Power Adapter - IT |
|
|
|
|
GPS Navigator For Rangers |
|
|
00100731 |
22/01/2015 |
Ian de Mello |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Dancers Workshop 05.12.2014 - Youth Centre |
|
|
00100732 |
22/01/2015 |
Matthew James Schwarzbach |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Install New Tee Signs - Carramar Golf Course - Property |
|
|
|
|
Remove/Dispose Of Tee Sign - Carramar Golf Course - Property |
|
|
00100733 |
22/01/2015 |
Paint West Centre |
$466.45 |
|
|
|
Paint Supplies - Community Links |
|
|
00100734 |
22/01/2015 |
PPW Pty Ltd |
$592.73 |
|
|
|
Tabloid Boxes, Binders & Photo Books - Heritage & Museums |
|
|
|
|
Large Boxes - Heritage |
|
|
00100735 |
22/01/2015 |
Project Industries |
$1,386.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
00100736 |
22/01/2015 |
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$1,415.50 |
|
|
|
Callout - Various Vehicles - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Nomination WN 33073 - Fleet |
|
|
00100737 |
22/01/2015 |
State Library of WA |
$1,123.45 |
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Book Charges |
|
|
00100738 |
22/01/2015 |
Stephen McKee |
$4,840.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Fence - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Clean Driveway - Ocean Side - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Remove Asbestos - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Jet Wash - Bitterclay - Waste |
|
|
00100739 |
22/01/2015 |
Susan O'Connell |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Report - HR |
|
|
00100740 |
22/01/2015 |
West Coast Spring Water Pty Ltd |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Water - Emergency Services |
|
|
00100741 |
19/01/2015 |
Bridget Campbell - Morrison |
$43.35 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - $43.35 Part Of Silver Aquatics & Gym Membership ($238.00) Downgraded To Bronze Aquatics Membership ($194.65) Doctor Has Advised Gym Membership Not Suitable |
|
|
00100742 |
20/01/2015 |
Lindsay & Anne Crooks |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100743 |
20/01/2015 |
Helen Spencer |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Gold Arts Festival |
|
|
00100744 |
21/01/2015 |
Jamie Duran & Sarah Fry |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100745 |
21/01/2015 |
Yuen Kheong Moh |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100746 |
07/01/2015 |
Alpine Drainage Pty Ltd |
$28,423.33 |
|
|
|
Sewer Main Extension Works - Lot 9335 Koondoola Avenue - Projects |
|
|
00100747 |
07/01/2015 |
Altronic Distributors |
$106.15 |
|
|
|
CCTV Kit Vehicle Rear View - Fleet |
|
|
00100748 |
07/01/2015 |
Ariens Company Pty Limited |
$40.88 |
|
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00100749 |
07/01/2015 |
Auswest Coolrooms |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Cool Room Hire For City Of Wanneroo Staff Christmas Party - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
00100750 |
07/01/2015 |
City of Belmont |
$37.00 |
|
|
|
Damaged Books Fee - Library |
|
|
00100751 |
07/01/2015 |
City of Cockburn |
$2,691.64 |
|
|
|
Long Service Leave Contribution - V Hartill - Finance |
|
|
00100752 |
07/01/2015 |
City of Swan |
$4,523.83 |
|
|
|
Long Service Contribution - Rohini Dias - Finance |
|
|
00100753 |
07/01/2015 |
Cooldrive Distribution |
$548.53 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
00100754 |
07/01/2015 |
Cut Price Imports |
$1,325.94 |
|
|
|
Australian Hand Fans - Marketing |
|
|
00100755 |
07/01/2015 |
E. E. Muir & Sons |
$264.00 |
|
|
|
Drum Pump - Parks |
|
|
00100756 |
07/01/2015 |
Kingsley Smash Repairs |
$1,191.01 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs For Fleet |
|
|
00100757 |
07/01/2015 |
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$19.95 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Nomination - Fleet |
|
|
00100758 |
07/01/2015 |
Stephen McKee |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Pick Up LPG Bottle & Remove - Parks |
|
|
00100759 |
07/01/2015 |
Town of Bassendean |
$3,911.26 |
|
|
|
Long Service Leave Contribution For R Rayson - Finance |
|
|
00100760 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$203.58 |
|
00100761 |
13/01/2015 |
Mental Health Carers Arafmi (WA) Incorporated |
$159.48 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100762 |
13/01/2015 |
Adriana Jessop |
$153.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Cancelled Due To Medical Reasons |
|
|
00100763 |
13/01/2015 |
Gavin Brown |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Direct Debits - Membership Cancelled October 2014 - Aquamotion |
|
|
00100764 |
13/01/2015 |
Mental Health Carers Arafmi (WA) Incorporated |
$136.71 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100765 |
13/01/2015 |
Mental Health Carers Arafmi (WA) Incorporated |
$123.76 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100766 |
13/01/2015 |
Leverock Pty Ltd |
$112.80 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100767 |
13/01/2015 |
Vietnamese Culture Association Incorporated |
$247.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fees Refund |
|
|
00100768 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$267.14 |
|
00100769 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$4,204.08 |
|
00100770 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$1,377.09 |
|
00100771 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$501.35 |
|
00100772 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$963.77 |
|
00100773 |
13/01/2015 |
Devina Sandler-Cook |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100774 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$3,686.93 |
|
00100775 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$1,052.76 |
|
00100776 |
13/01/2015 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association |
$1,755.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding Program - Australia Day Breakfast 2015 |
|
|
00100777 |
13/01/2015 |
DJ Reynolds |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100778 |
13/01/2015 |
C May |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100779 |
13/01/2015 |
KL Lawson |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00100780 |
13/01/2015 |
Murauba Pty Ltd |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Surplus Application Fees - Item 29 Of The Planning And Sustainability Fee Schedule Is $700 - Cheque Received For $800 |
|
|
00100781 |
13/01/2015 |
Maureen Deacon |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Client Not Available |
|
|
00100782 |
13/01/2015 |
Mayfair WA Property Services |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100783 |
13/01/2015 |
Patrick Talbot |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100784 |
13/01/2015 |
Manu Goyal |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100785 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$2,505.32 |
|
00100786 |
13/01/2015 |
D & YS Rankin |
$175.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100787 |
13/01/2015 |
S Linardopoulos |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100788 |
13/01/2015 |
Dana Trickey |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement Windscreen Damage - Mowing Incident 01.12.2014 - Connolly Drive - Insurance |
|
|
00100789 |
13/01/2015 |
Steven Pyke |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100790 |
13/01/2015 |
Yousif Tamim |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100791 |
13/01/2015 |
Mary Hajaji |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100792 |
13/01/2015 |
Renee Mutetwa |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100793 |
13/01/2015 |
Mr M A & Ms C Walton |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100794 |
13/01/2015 |
Mohammed Hafiz |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100795 |
13/01/2015 |
Azmi Salloomi |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100796 |
13/01/2015 |
Joondalup Malayalee Association Incorporated |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100797 |
13/01/2015 |
Edmond Davies |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100798 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$1,636.17 |
|
00100799 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$1,428.15 |
|
00100800 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$33.90 |
|
00100801 |
13/01/2015 |
Keyuri Patel |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Refund For School Holiday Program |
|
|
00100802 |
13/01/2015 |
Mina Hunter |
$51.13 |
|
|
|
Refund For Direct Debit Payment For Service Being Unavailable - 1 Month Due To Vac Swim |
|
|
00100803 |
13/01/2015 |
Jenny Medling |
$59.50 |
|
|
|
Refund For Direct Debit Payment For Service Being Unavailable - 1 Month Due To Vac Swim |
|
|
00100804 |
13/01/2015 |
Ray White Uxcel |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100805 |
13/01/2015 |
Shayne Gadenne |
$59.50 |
|
|
|
Refund For Direct Debit Payment For Service Being Unavailable - 1 Month Due To Vac Swim |
|
|
00100806 |
13/01/2015 |
Candice Miller |
$65.00 |
|
|
|
Refund For Direct Debit Payment For Service Being Unavailable - 1 Month Due To Vac Swim |
|
|
00100807 |
13/01/2015 |
Raelene Verden |
$59.50 |
|
|
|
Refund For Direct Debit Payment For Service Being Unavailable - 1 Month Due To Vac Swim |
|
|
00100808 |
13/01/2015 |
Building and Construction Industry |
$139,487.59 |
|
|
|
Building And Construction Industry Training Fund Construction Levy Payments 01-31 December 2014 |
|
|
00100809 |
13/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100810 |
13/01/2015 |
Hugo Stanley-Cary |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100811 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$125.80 |
|
00100812 |
13/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$125.80 |
|
00100813 |
13/01/2015 |
Nuer Community Association of WA Incorporated |
$450.87 |
|
|
|
Partial Bond Refund |
|
|
00100814 |
13/01/2015 |
Haider Al Marshadi |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
|
00100815 |
13/01/2015 |
Nollamara RSL Club Incorporated |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
|
00100816 |
13/01/2015 |
Vespoli Constructions |
$720.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100817 |
13/01/2015 |
T Butler |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00100818 |
13/01/2015 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Petty Cash |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100819 |
13/01/2015 |
AMP Life Limited |
$3,411.89 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100820 |
13/01/2015 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$205.10 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100821 |
13/01/2015 |
Facility Officer WLCC Petty Cash |
$106.05 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100822 |
13/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$97.60 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100823 |
13/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100824 |
13/01/2015 |
Synergy |
$28,088.85 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
00100825 |
13/01/2015 |
Telstra |
$13,665.24 |
|
|
|
Phone/Internet Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 x Financial Assistance $105.11 |
|
|
00100826 |
13/01/2015 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$79.45 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100827 |
13/01/2015 |
Generations Personal Super |
$623.40 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100828 |
13/01/2015 |
Navigator Applications Account |
$196.36 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100829 |
13/01/2015 |
Hostplus Superannuation Fund |
$3,468.64 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100830 |
13/01/2015 |
Australian Super |
$5,330.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100831 |
13/01/2015 |
MLC Nominees Pty Limited |
$2,072.70 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100832 |
13/01/2015 |
The Industry Superannuation Fund |
$451.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100833 |
13/01/2015 |
1OOF Portfolio Service Superannuation Fund |
$83.81 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100834 |
13/01/2015 |
Integra Super |
$343.28 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100835 |
13/01/2015 |
Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund |
$663.12 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100836 |
13/01/2015 |
First State Super |
$577.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100837 |
13/01/2015 |
MTAA Superannuation Fund |
$899.18 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100838 |
13/01/2015 |
Australiansuper |
$10,257.28 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100839 |
13/01/2015 |
Rest Superannuation |
$11,261.29 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100840 |
13/01/2015 |
Asgard Capital Management Ltd |
$1,002.01 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100841 |
13/01/2015 |
Unisuper Limited |
$1,262.12 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100842 |
13/01/2015 |
Hesta Super Fund |
$2,086.79 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100843 |
13/01/2015 |
Prime Super |
$401.94 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100844 |
13/01/2015 |
Colonial First State Firstchoice |
$2,438.82 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100845 |
13/01/2015 |
Care Super |
$383.92 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100846 |
13/01/2015 |
Spectrum Super |
$523.99 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100847 |
13/01/2015 |
Media Super |
$414.07 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100848 |
13/01/2015 |
BT Super For Life |
$2,524.18 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100849 |
13/01/2015 |
Telstra Superannuation Scheme |
$3,050.07 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100850 |
13/01/2015 |
Amist Super |
$376.36 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100851 |
13/01/2015 |
Valdor Superannuation Fund |
$146.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100852 |
13/01/2015 |
Health Industry Plan (Hip) |
$263.54 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100853 |
13/01/2015 |
Vision Super Pty Ltd |
$467.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100854 |
13/01/2015 |
Macquarie Investment Management Ltd |
$294.91 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100855 |
13/01/2015 |
Superwrap - Personal Super Plan |
$1,334.56 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100856 |
13/01/2015 |
Sunsuper Pty Ltd |
$1,947.81 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100857 |
13/01/2015 |
Construction & Building Unions |
$438.63 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100858 |
13/01/2015 |
Asteron Optimum - Suncorp Master Trust |
$575.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100859 |
13/01/2015 |
ANZ Superannuation Saving Account |
$101.71 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100860 |
13/01/2015 |
Perpetual Wealth Focus Super Plan |
$451.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100861 |
13/01/2015 |
Statewide Superannuation Trust |
$420.80 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100862 |
13/01/2015 |
IHS Superannuation Fund |
$240.56 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100863 |
13/01/2015 |
AXA Australia |
$451.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100864 |
13/01/2015 |
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Staff |
$497.94 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100865 |
13/01/2015 |
Victorian Superannuation Fund |
$534.78 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100866 |
13/01/2015 |
Matrix Superannuation Master Trust |
$647.38 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100867 |
13/01/2015 |
The Trustee for Tindari Self Managed Superannuation Fund |
$446.08 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100868 |
13/01/2015 |
QSuper |
$523.48 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100869 |
13/01/2015 |
The Trustee For Legalsuper |
$1,058.61 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100870 |
13/01/2015 |
North |
$565.84 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
00100871 |
13/01/2015 |
CellMark Asia Pty Ltd |
$3,886.02 |
|
|
|
Sale Of Products - Commodity Round 55 Bank Deposit To Be Repaid - WRC |
|
|
00100872 |
20/01/2015 |
LGISWA |
$5,748.66 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Double Payments Of Invoices 133159 & 133177 - Finance |
|
|
00100873 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$1,721.00 |
|
00100874 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$408.43 |
|
00100875 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$11,459.28 |
|
00100876 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$23,154.67 |
|
00100877 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$650.00 |
|
00100878 |
20/01/2015 |
De Freitas and Ryan |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100879 |
20/01/2015 |
S & J Gladwin |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100880 |
20/01/2015 |
J Mangan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100881 |
20/01/2015 |
Y Kriel |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Wedding Ceremony 21.02.2015 Kingsbridge Park |
|
|
00100882 |
20/01/2015 |
S Morgan |
$19.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilisation |
|
|
00100883 |
20/01/2015 |
S A Kane |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00100884 |
20/01/2015 |
K Franklin |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00100885 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$700.56 |
|
00100886 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$680.07 |
|
00100887 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$680.07 |
|
00100888 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$276.42 |
|
00100889 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$624.18 |
|
00100890 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$875.71 |
|
00100891 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$276.42 |
|
00100892 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$800.96 |
|
00100893 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$377.02 |
|
00100894 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$602.50 |
|
00100895 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$301.25 |
|
00100896 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$904.86 |
|
00100897 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$602.50 |
|
00100898 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$206.48 |
|
00100899 |
20/01/2015 |
Parth Shah |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100900 |
20/01/2015 |
Calisthenics Association of WA Incorporated |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100901 |
20/01/2015 |
Belinda Glavovic |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100902 |
20/01/2015 |
Hayley Haylock |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100903 |
20/01/2015 |
Zulaika Ali |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100904 |
20/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Giants Baseball Club |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
|
00100905 |
20/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Giants Baseball Club |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Key Bond Refund |
|
|
00100906 |
20/01/2015 |
Cassidy Samardali |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement Of Direct Debits For May 2014 - January 2015 - Aquamotion Membership |
|
|
00100907 |
20/01/2015 |
Sharon Ifould |
$42.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100908 |
20/01/2015 |
J Brennan |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Photos Of Me - Gold Program |
|
|
00100909 |
20/01/2015 |
Joondalup DCP |
$14.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100910 |
20/01/2015 |
T Bates |
$21.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100911 |
20/01/2015 |
C Cowper |
$14.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100912 |
20/01/2015 |
K Sebastian |
$28.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100913 |
20/01/2015 |
K Treasure |
$28.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Multisport North 2015 Program Cancelled |
|
|
00100914 |
20/01/2015 |
K Masters |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100915 |
20/01/2015 |
A Sheppard |
$308.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100916 |
20/01/2015 |
Penelope Jarvis-Vagg |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100917 |
20/01/2015 |
N & L Jesani |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100918 |
20/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100919 |
20/01/2015 |
Chiron Aesir |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100920 |
20/01/2015 |
Katherine Cochrane |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Toddler Tuesday Program - Unable To Attend |
|
|
00100921 |
20/01/2015 |
K G Parker |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Dog Registration - Sterilisation |
|
|
00100922 |
20/01/2015 |
D Salerno |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100923 |
20/01/2015 |
Quinns Calisthenics Club (Incorporated) |
$691.37 |
|
|
|
Community Funding Program - Free Family Fun Event 31.01.2015 |
|
|
00100924 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$80.31 |
|
00100925 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$184.99 |
|
00100926 |
20/01/2015 |
Exclusive Strata Management |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Copies Of Plans - Paid Twice In Error |
|
|
00100927 |
20/01/2015 |
Collier Homes |
$72.60 |
|
|
|
Refund - Codes Variation Fee - Overpayment |
|
|
00100928 |
20/01/2015 |
I Coles |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Dog Registration - Sterilised |
|
|
00100929 |
20/01/2015 |
R Dean |
$25.40 |
|
|
|
Refund - Dog Registration - Sterilised |
|
|
00100930 |
20/01/2015 |
R March |
$48.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Hire Fee |
|
|
00100931 |
20/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$74.26 |
|
00100932 |
23/01/2015 |
Western Australian Planning Commission |
$3,111.41 |
|
|
|
Subdivision Application Fee For Lot 9046 Wangara - Property |
|
|
00100933 |
28/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$670.76 |
|
00100934 |
28/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$386.79 |
|
00100935 |
28/01/2015 |
Steven Lewis |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100936 |
28/01/2015 |
Mr G H Lawther |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100937 |
28/01/2015 |
Amanda Parrin |
$2,600.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100938 |
28/01/2015 |
Mellena Blanchard |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100939 |
28/01/2015 |
DE & RL Clayden |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100940 |
28/01/2015 |
Malinda Benetti |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100941 |
28/01/2015 |
Duoc Huynh |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100942 |
28/01/2015 |
The Potters House - Joondalup |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100943 |
28/01/2015 |
Deborah Young |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100944 |
28/01/2015 |
Brendan Meikle |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100945 |
28/01/2015 |
New Line Architecture |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application Fees - Not Required |
|
|
00100946 |
28/01/2015 |
WA Heritage Tree Surgeons |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100947 |
28/01/2015 |
Tin Soon Tang & Boey Yoong Lee |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100948 |
28/01/2015 |
Mr Ross Fawcett |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilisation |
|
|
00100949 |
28/01/2015 |
Rates Refund |
$32,589.90 |
|
00100950 |
28/01/2015 |
Jocelyn Fewster |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100951 |
28/01/2015 |
Marianne Haast |
$787.50 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100952 |
28/01/2015 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100953 |
28/01/2015 |
Zenawi Gebreselassie |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100954 |
28/01/2015 |
Gensee Wandah |
$810.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00100955 |
28/01/2015 |
Samuel & Clare Sheedy |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100956 |
28/01/2015 |
Erin Sharman & Tyron Rees |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100957 |
28/01/2015 |
Landsdale Guardian Pharmacy |
$215.08 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100958 |
28/01/2015 |
Ken Huang |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00100959 |
28/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100960 |
28/01/2015 |
Northern Corridor Developments |
$6,833.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Supervision Fee - Paid Twice |
|
|
00100961 |
28/01/2015 |
Emma V Hart |
$76.80 |
|
|
|
Refund Swimming Lesson Term 1 2015 |
|
|
00100962 |
28/01/2015 |
Alexander Heights Day Centre Petty |
$94.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100963 |
28/01/2015 |
Alinta Gas |
$345.55 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
00100964 |
28/01/2015 |
Landgate |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Registration Fee - Surrender Of Lease - Property |
|
|
00100965 |
28/01/2015 |
Mr Evan Martin |
$133.50 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
00100966 |
28/01/2015 |
Quinns Rocks Adult Day Care Petty Cash |
$21.35 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100967 |
28/01/2015 |
The Heights Community Club Petty Cash |
$39.60 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100968 |
28/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$71.15 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100969 |
28/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100970 |
28/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100971 |
28/01/2015 |
Water Corporation |
$31,608.24 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sewerage Manhole Fee - Baltimore Parade - Projects |
|
|
00100972 |
28/01/2015 |
Yanchep Community Centre Petty Cash |
$60.75 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100973 |
28/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100974 |
28/01/2015 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00100975 |
28/01/2015 |
Synergy |
$475,178.45 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance $251.55 |
|
|
00100976 |
28/01/2015 |
Telstra |
$17,259.66 |
|
|
|
Asset Relocation - Brazier Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
3 X Financial Assistance $395.48 |
|
|
00100977 |
28/01/2015 |
Mrs Jennifer Martin |
$117.50 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
00100978 |
28/01/2015 |
Kingsway Stadium Petty Cash |
$242.60 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00100979 |
28/01/2015 |
Ms Jodie Walter |
$106.90 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
00100980 |
28/01/2015 |
Phoenix Basketball Club Incorporated |
$1,050.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 8 Children |
|
|
00100981 |
28/01/2015 |
Wanneroo Lions Touch Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00100982 |
28/01/2015 |
Mr Graham John Woodard |
$160.40 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
00100983 |
28/01/2015 |
Ms Christine McGee |
$363.15 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
00100984 |
28/01/2015 |
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$526.00 |
|
|
|
Call Out Fee - Various Vehicles |
|
|
00100985 |
28/01/2015 |
Repco Auto Parts |
$161.70 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
00100986 |
28/01/2015 |
The Good Guys |
$149.00 |
|
|
|
Canon Camera - Planning Implementation |
|
|
00100987 |
28/01/2015 |
Professionals Northern Coast |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
1 X Financial Assistance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$1,427,637.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00002140 |
06/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$12,721.50 |
|
|
|
Land Enquiries - Various Departments |
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002141 |
06/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
A One Audio Pty Ltd |
$191.00 |
|
|
|
Speakers For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$2,681.64 |
|
|
|
Repair Bullnose Capping Amery Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies |
$2,202.72 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Locking Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Adform Shopfitting Pty Ltd |
$92.40 |
|
|
|
Engraved Photo Board Plaques - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Advance Press (2013) Pty Ltd |
$3,278.00 |
|
|
|
Mailing Charges For Dog & Cat Registrations - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Airlube Australasia |
$725.46 |
|
|
|
Fuel Water Separators - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$205.00 |
|
|
|
Large Bright 100th Birthday Box Arrangement - Mary Sharpe - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Large Sympathy Box Arrangement - Rita Matera - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$5,542.31 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Pty Ltd |
$2,909.50 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ape Springs & Suspensions |
$49.50 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Aquamaster Reticulation Services |
$294.80 |
|
|
|
Reinstall Reticulation To Kerbline And Test Sprinklers At Graham Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Archival Survival Pty Ltd |
$115.94 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Heritage |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$518.74 |
|
|
|
Cash Collections For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram |
$801.80 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Turf |
$2,161.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Softfall And Security Guard - Willespie Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Softfall & Security Guard - Carosa Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$94.12 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
AUSQ Training |
$5,104.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Basic Worksite Traffic Management For Waste Services 07 - 08.01.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd |
$290.94 |
|
|
|
Licence Fee - Background Music - Wanneroo Civic Centre |
|
|
|
|
Auto Blackbox Pty Ltd |
$483.00 |
|
|
|
Blackvue In Car Drive Recorder & SD Card - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro |
$2,222.00 |
|
|
|
Floor Smart Cleanser - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Aveling Group |
$65.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Work Safely In The Construction Industry White Card Online For Gary Mills - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$8,707.07 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Beryl Weston |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services At 28 Denston Way - Programs |
|
|
|
|
Bidvest Hospitality Perth |
$996.71 |
|
|
|
Coffee, Tea & Sugar For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$374.84 |
|
|
|
Hire Of Temporary Fencing - Adora Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd |
$1,246.30 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim - Kingsway Regional Playground - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Administration Works And Defects For Kingsway Regional Playground - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$1,371.31 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bridgeleigh Reception Centre |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Deposit For Xmas Dinner - Carers - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$7,919.37 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$480.77 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited |
$19,185.18 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec Australasia Pty Ltd |
$563.20 |
|
|
|
High Tambour Adjustable Unit - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
C Wood Distributors |
$947.76 |
|
|
|
Protein Shakes, Balls & Bars - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$249.70 |
|
|
|
15,000Km Service WN 33587 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$16,467.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Quinns Beach Long Term Costal Management - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Cardno Geotech Pty Ltd |
$448.91 |
|
|
|
MDD Modified Compaction - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$11,926.80 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pick Up Sand Of From Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$1,548.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
City of Joondalup |
$4,136.62 |
|
|
|
Long Service Contribution For Alan Salvage - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$4,026.00 |
|
|
|
HR & Payroll Onsite Consulting Services - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$370.43 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Clark Rubber |
$129.00 |
|
|
|
Inflatable Boat - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$92,277.79 |
|
|
|
Processing Of Recyclables - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Rear Loader & Operator & Skid Steer Loader - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$88.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$200.41 |
|
|
|
Beverages For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Community Arts Network WA Ltd |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Membership For Large Organisation - Heritage |
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$7.02 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Stores |
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts |
$637.61 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Customised Metal Works |
$88.00 |
|
|
|
Machine Two Sockets - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited |
$14,324.99 |
|
|
|
Software Purchases - IT |
|
|
|
|
Davey Glass |
$2,649.46 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
De Vita & Dixon Lawyers |
$1,477.30 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$210,334.30 |
|
|
|
Computers & Laptops For IT |
|
|
|
|
Demon Detailing |
$451.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Detail - Programs |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$2,949.00 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$1,528.73 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Two Way Radio - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Discus Digital Print |
$335.50 |
|
|
|
Printing - Summer Reading Club - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
DMH Precision Engineering |
$3,620.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Concrete |
$30,372.56 |
|
|
|
Path Construction - Anchorage Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pavers -Belgrade Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Concrete Panel - Carramar Golf Course - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$20,794.40 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$424.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Eco-Care (WA) Pty Ltd |
$299.75 |
|
|
|
Cleaning - Jenolan Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Elan Media Partners Pty Ltd |
$167.57 |
|
|
|
Bookstock For Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Electro Medical Group Pty Ltd |
$5,148.00 |
|
|
|
Vaccine Fridge/ Installation - Health |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$118,232.85 |
|
|
|
Landscaping/Mowing/Planting - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,416.80 |
|
|
|
Parts Washer Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Essential Fire Services |
$2,141.70 |
|
|
|
Replace Fire Panel - Cockman House - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Event Furniture Sales |
$968.00 |
|
|
|
Chairs For Function - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Evolution Sports Imports Pty Ltd |
$407.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment For Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Fatboy Slam |
$229.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$505.88 |
|
|
|
Magazine Subscriptions - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Flexible Drive Agencies |
$93.50 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Forpark Australia |
$52,800.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Broadview Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Adora Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Freds Hardware |
$153.85 |
|
|
|
Hardware - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$6,074.41 |
|
|
|
Replace Sirenco Siren Unit - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
EFlare Beacons & EFlare Bases & Clone Clips - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Kestrel Portable Weather Meter - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Various Parts - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$56,484.97 |
|
|
|
Tree Services - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ghems Holding Pty Ltd |
$52,250.00 |
|
|
|
Handweeding & Disposal Of Weeds - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Spraying - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Grant Thornton |
$3,927.00 |
|
|
|
Audit Of Acquittals - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$423.50 |
|
|
|
Move Goal Posts - Various |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$9,923.69 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hendercare |
$16,518.86 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$564.89 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Hosemart |
$31.44 |
|
|
|
Hose Fittings - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Injury Connect Pty Ltd |
$13,200.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Access To Injury Connect - City Business |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Fleet Management Workshop 28.11.2014 - D. Simons |
|
|
|
|
J.H. Fluid Transfer Solutions Pty Ltd |
$1,246.51 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Jaffa Room |
$6,952.00 |
|
|
|
Distribution Rights To Screen Lita Film Program - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$123.84 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$77.99 |
|
|
|
CD Receiver - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
JCA Dealer Services |
$598.40 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Jumbo Vision International Pty Ltd |
$209.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Interactive Display - Museum |
|
|
|
|
KDAire Mechanical Services |
$372.90 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$1,086.91 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$87.98 |
|
|
|
Christmas Decorations - Social Support |
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Arty Parties And All About Play - Heritage |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$1,731.48 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire |
$205.70 |
|
|
|
Indoor Plant Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landmark Engineering & Design Pty Ltd |
$13,795.10 |
|
|
|
Install Shelter/Benches - Elliot Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$202.81 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$94,444.52 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Lets Go Kids |
$1,694.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,843.59 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Express Pty Ltd |
$1,620.59 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$25,789.23 |
|
|
|
1284 X 240Ltr Bins - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$39,121.50 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors |
$2,320.45 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mercury Search & Selection Pty Ltd |
$2,970.00 |
|
|
|
Referee Reports & Selection Panels - HR |
|
|
|
|
Variation Module - Change Request - HR |
|
|
|
|
Metrocount |
$2,263.80 |
|
|
|
Field Road Tube - Transport & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
MGA Town Planners |
$1,251.25 |
|
|
|
Retail Needs Assessment - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$353,918.80 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Modern Motor Trimmers |
$343.99 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Seat Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Move It |
$968.00 |
|
|
|
Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mr Branko Civich |
$245.40 |
|
|
|
Remedial Massage Services At Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Ms Anne Yardley |
$445.00 |
|
|
|
Oral History Interview - Library Building |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$117,030.43 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd |
$17,911.41 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Connolly Drive Dualling - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle People |
$839.46 |
|
|
|
Staff Hire For Christmas Party |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$535.70 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$1,710.87 |
|
|
|
Printing Of Annual Report Plan & Corporate Business Plan – Governance & Business Improvement |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Summer Reading Club - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$117,340.18 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$1,155.00 |
|
|
|
Pavement Testing - Smales Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Raeco International Pty Ltd |
$2,266.91 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
Recall Total Information Management |
$2,116.90 |
|
|
|
Scanning For Carabooda Project - Archives |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$4,903.80 |
|
|
|
Linemarking - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia |
$484.00 |
|
|
|
Signs - Pedestrian Beach Access - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$91,222.46 |
|
|
|
Road Resurfacing - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$840.13 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Brickies Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports |
$3,964.40 |
|
|
|
Replace Synthetic Turf - Parks |
|
|
|
|
State Law Publisher |
$83.40 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Sterihealth Services Pty Ltd |
$89.47 |
|
|
|
Delivery/Pickup - Clinical Waste - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Stihl Shop Osborne Park |
$324.50 |
|
|
|
Spare Parks For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$21,732.28 |
|
|
|
GST Payable - November 2014 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Terpkos Engineering Pty Ltd |
$7,986.00 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim - Retaining Walls - Opportunity Street - Property |
|
|
|
|
The A J Harding Family Trust |
$1,018.00 |
|
|
|
Your Guide To Perth And Fremantle Advertising - Planning & Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Executive Board Company |
$20,200.00 |
|
|
|
HR Leadership Council For Midsized Councils - HR |
|
|
|
|
The Factory |
$2,566.08 |
|
|
|
Street Banners - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Toolmart |
$459.00 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$1,135.00 |
|
|
|
Limestone Work - Wanneroo Civic Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$3,900.05 |
|
|
|
Renovation And Composting To Driving Range Tee - Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$112.46 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$253.00 |
|
|
|
Check/Repair Radio - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vetcare Innovation Pty Ltd |
$1,228.40 |
|
|
|
Microchip 14 X Dog/Cat - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia 10 X Dog/Cat - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Consultation/Pharmaceuticals - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$11,291.50 |
|
|
|
Traffic Management Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$341.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Byfold Doors At Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$545.75 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$6,988.30 |
|
|
|
Height Adjustable Desk For Library Services |
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association |
$3,960.00 |
|
|
|
Leadership Behaviour Review Consultancy Fees - HR |
|
|
|
|
Short Course Effective Letter & December - S Bartell |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$144.93 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One |
$31.35 |
|
|
|
Plastic Diesel Can - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$27,315.30 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA |
$173.76 |
|
|
|
Groceries - Buckingham House |
|
|
|
|
Groceries - Dolphin Christmas Party - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$26,418.15 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$257.40 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$4,485.37 |
|
|
|
Glass Arrows - 2015 Australia Day Awards - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Trophies, Medals & Engraving - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Medal Engraving - Name Error - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Soccer Trophies - Hainsworth Youth Centre |
|
|
|
|
Name Badge - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Crystal Awards - HR |
|
|
|
|
West Australian Nursing Agency |
$818.91 |
|
|
|
Immunisation Clinic - Health |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$30,316.00 |
|
|
|
Transport - Refuse From WRC To Cleanaway - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Westrac |
$7,066.10 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd |
$11,423.16 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Wilsons Sign Solutions |
$258.50 |
|
|
|
Clean & Apply Vinyl Lettering - Councillor Desk Name Tags - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$79.20 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - S McKenna - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Workplace Training Advisory Australia |
$4,900.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Australian Applied Management Colloquium Less AAMC Scholarship - H Singh - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$5,635.74 |
|
|
|
Planting/Maintenance - Queenscliffe Beach Road Access - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$168.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd |
$33,858.00 |
|
|
|
Final Progress Claim - Quinns Rock Metocean Data - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$659.45 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste Oil - WRC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002142 |
07/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$29,573.94 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment - Growing Of Plants - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002143 |
07/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bistel Construction Pty Ltd |
$38,181.88 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 5 - Kingsway Baseball Improvements - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hender Lee Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$5,663.90 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 4 - St Andrews Park Floodlighting - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002144 |
07/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$561.60 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$1,515.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$1,013,341.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,364.74 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$11,717.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$1,714.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer |
$223.17 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance November 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$1,214.30 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$2,608.60 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Janice Lewis |
$210.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Quinns |
|
|
|
|
John Gregor Downer |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Shoppers |
|
|
|
|
Kingsway United Christian Football Club Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$4,054.60 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Miss Wendy Stewart |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Codie Safe |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Cadet Engineer Program - University Fees |
|
|
|
|
Mr Jared Lovelock |
$130.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Lifeguard Requalification - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Mr Michael Penson |
$450.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Subscription To CSA 2015 |
|
|
|
|
Perth Energy Pty Ltd |
$11,257.40 |
|
|
|
Gas Charges For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Districts Junior Football Club |
$512.75 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Spoiled Goods Due To Power Being Switched Off - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$36,438.12 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
GST Inputs Claimed To Be Credited To Employees Accounts For December 2014 Adjustment To GST Inputs To November Due To Refund Of GST On Returned Funds |
|
|
|
|
Shire of Mundaring |
$13.10 |
|
|
|
Lost/Damaged Library Items - Library |
|
|
|
|
Shobukan Pty Ltd |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$23.76 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Messaging |
$3,667.80 |
|
|
|
SMS Messaging Alerts - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Junior Cricket Club |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Secondary College |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Academic Scholarships For Jaxsy Todd & Joel Quaid - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$4,500.00 |
|
|
|
Design Fee - Koondoola Avenue And Russell Road Madeley - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002145 |
07/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grass Growers |
$25,718.78 |
|
|
|
Greenwaste Received October And November 2014 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002146 |
13/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Arena Swim Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$3,368.16 |
|
|
|
Billpay Transaction Fees December - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$7,218.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Barlow Superannuation Fund |
$1,701.38 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Balance Of Refund Of Bank Deposit For Sale Of Products Invoices 152259 = $7.61 152256 = $2.39 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver |
$351.52 |
|
|
|
Travel Expenses December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning |
$5,885.00 |
|
|
|
Development Application Fee DA2014/2449 - Lot 400 (157) Kingsway Darch - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$657.20 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
High Flyers Gym |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
John Everitt Superannuation Fund |
$171.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$1,437.08 |
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - Rates |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$9.70 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Mary Colvin |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Maureen Butler |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Hazel Walker |
$105.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Districts Calisthenics Club |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Snowbird Gardens Superannuation Fund |
$270.86 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Susan Morrissey |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
The Claystone Superannuation Fund |
$428.04 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The FIA Magid Superannuation Fund |
$513.69 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The Forrestal Superannuation Fund |
$155.29 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The Michael Penson Superannuation Fund |
$5,084.92 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The Scout Association of Australia WA |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For Bobs Superannuation Fund |
$575.42 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For G & F Hodges Family Super Fund |
$1,344.62 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
The Trustees of The Easson Family Superannuation Fund |
$428.85 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Timms Superannuation Fund |
$357.60 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
WA Super |
$554,070.86 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Little Athletics Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002147 |
13/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Super |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Deduction From Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$332.18 |
|
|
|
Rates Payments Deducted Form Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Denis John Hayden |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dianne Guise |
$1,725.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,326.15 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda May Aitken |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Norman Hewer |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Robert Smithson |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Russell Driver |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Sabine Winton |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Thi Nguyet-Anh Truong |
$2,575.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$11,158.33 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002148 |
13/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd |
$548.17 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$526.30 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$273.87 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Caltex Energy |
$1,048.17 |
|
|
|
Fuel - December 2014 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$2,013.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Authority Administration - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,117.82 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$111,056.00 |
|
|
|
Rear Loader & Operator & Skid Steer Loader For Bulk Verge Collections - Waste |
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts |
$333.38 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$149.01 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$1,804.00 |
|
|
|
Clean Skate Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeper - Motivation Drive - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Drive In Electrics |
$39.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Faulty Globe - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$21,567.48 |
|
|
|
Planting - Yanchep Boardwalk - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Landscaping - Hepburn - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Detail Work - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$47,201.03 |
|
|
|
Pruning - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$34.60 |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$5,280.19 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For IT |
|
|
|
|
J & K Hopkins |
$553.00 |
|
|
|
Cathedral Pinboard X 2 - Library |
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$224.88 |
|
|
|
Speakers/CD Read Unit - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$101.00 |
|
|
|
Vacuum Bags For Poppies - Museums |
|
|
|
|
Various Items - Banksia Grove Community |
|
|
|
|
Konnect (Coventry Fasteners) |
$12.30 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$59.04 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - Programs |
|
|
|
|
Lynford Motors |
$51,603.20 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Ford Ranger Supercab - Fleet Assets $51,603.20 |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,588.24 |
|
|
|
Service/Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mandi Nelson |
$858.00 |
|
|
|
Yoga Classes December 2014 - Aquamotion/Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Express Pty Ltd |
$2,667.92 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$30,854.25 |
|
|
|
884 X 240Ltr Bins - Waste |
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors |
$7,103.60 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$318,522.95 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Nessco Pressure Systems |
$1,100.77 |
|
|
|
Service For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nice Design |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
Vinyl Lettering For Museum Shop - Heritage & Museums |
|
|
|
|
Nuford |
$645.70 |
|
|
|
Central Locking - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$4,687.10 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Officemax |
$210.67 |
|
|
|
Various Print Room Supplies - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Our Community Pty Ltd |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Grants Funding Subscription - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Repack And Weigh Seed - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$270.89 |
|
|
|
Printing - Beginner Reader - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$34,762.26 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$5,089.38 |
|
|
|
Windbreak Fencing - Quinns Foreshore - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Windbreak Fencing - Two Rocks Foreshore - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia |
$2,299.00 |
|
|
|
Signs - Various - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Alexander Community Centre - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$391.88 |
|
|
|
Asphalt - Wilkie Avenue - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Asphalt - Joyce - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
RSPCA WA Incorporated |
$2,542.39 |
|
|
|
Pound Fees - November 2014 - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$54.18 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Stalker Pumps |
$104.50 |
|
|
|
Flap Check Valve - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$3,509.67 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
The Community Network Australia Digital Advertising Networks |
$198.83 |
|
|
|
Monthly Instalment For October 2014 TV Advertising At IGA Landsdale - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$8,987.00 |
|
|
|
Limestone Signs - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Bush Fire Brigade Social Club |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Library Function Room Hire - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$2,084.07 |
|
|
|
Medals For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Medals For Dolphin Olympics - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$56.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - HR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002149 |
13/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$157,732.82 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002150 |
14/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$12,370.33 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim - Flynn Drive Stage 1 Projects |
|
|
|
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
$117,041.82 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 7 - Construction Flynn Drive Stage 1 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 3 & 4 - Consultancy Services Flynn Drive Stage 2 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002151 |
15/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Muni Reconciliation November 2014 $41,084.98 – Breakdown Page 62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002152 |
20/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$292.80 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$757.50 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$501,657.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Auswaste Recycling Pty Ltd |
$7,748.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Bank Deposit - WRC Commodity Round 55 |
|
|
|
|
Building Commission |
$77,129.29 |
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payment 01-31 December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$1,697.71 |
|
|
|
Taxi Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$682.37 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,003.50 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$848.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Cycle Link Australia Pty Ltd |
$38,920.99 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Bank Deposit - WRC Commodity Round 55 |
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$1,929.20 |
|
|
|
Mailroom Service Contract - December 2014 - Information Management |
|
|
|
|
Frediani Milk Wholesalers |
$442.50 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
HBF Insurance |
$1,304.30 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$2,037.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$1,550.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - WALGA Sitting Fees June - December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Perth Energy Pty Ltd |
$10,966.06 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Selectus Salary Packaging |
$15,210.30 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$605.29 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Locate Underground Distribution Cable At Northern Side Of Flynn Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002153 |
20/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum Servicing Pty Ltd |
$81,246.83 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment 4 - Civic Centre Replace Fire Detection System - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002154 |
20/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$27,515.90 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 1 - Propagation Of Seed - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002155 |
20/01/2015 |
National Australia Bank - October 2014 - $18,004.07 - Breakdown on Page 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002156 |
22/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Avenue Singers Incorporated |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainment - Christmas Party - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
A1 Apiaries |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Beehive Treatment - Newlyn Park & Newman Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Bees - Calison Koondoola - Parks |
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$12,024.91 |
|
|
|
Pavers - Rawlinson Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Specialists |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Accidental First Aid Supplies |
$190.74 |
|
|
|
Basic Snake Bite First Aid Kit - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Tailoring Company |
$243.10 |
|
|
|
Cargo Trousers X 2 - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Aged & Community Services WA Incorporated |
$2,380.88 |
|
|
|
Membership - January - June 2015 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
AHRI - Australian Human Resources Institute |
$693.00 |
|
|
|
Renewal Of Organisation Membership 30.11.2014 - 01.12.2015 - HR |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide WA Pty Ltd |
$673.95 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Alanco Australia Pty Ltd |
$285.18 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Wreaths And Flowers - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Large Sympathy Box Arrangement & Delivery - Russell Hosken - Mayor's Office |
|
|
|
|
Sympathy Box - Stuart McKenzie – Mayor’s Office |
|
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$42.40 |
|
|
|
Self Inking Stamps X 2 - Library |
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$5,054.74 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Pty Ltd |
$5,709.00 |
|
|
|
Chemicals For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Root Health Assessment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Analytical Reference Laboratory |
$176.00 |
|
|
|
Standard Water Analysis - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Anstat Pty Ltd |
$277.29 |
|
|
|
Anz Food Standards Code Kit X 1 - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$1,118.89 |
|
|
|
Cash Collections Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Arrow Pressure Wash |
$572.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram |
$3,174.85 |
|
|
|
2 X Mini Reverse Camera - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Asphaltech Pty Ltd |
$152.00 |
|
|
|
Asphalt Delivery - Warman Street - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Turf |
$1,914.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Rubber Softfall - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd |
$2,720.83 |
|
|
|
Copyright Music Licence Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Consumers Association |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Choice Online Subscription From 01.01.2015 - 30.06.2015 - Library |
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$5,309.70 |
|
|
|
Casual Mechanic - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Autosmart WA North Metro |
$1,817.75 |
|
|
|
Floor Smart Cleanse - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$39,172.64 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bidvest Hospitality Perth |
$323.40 |
|
|
|
Biscuits & Milk - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$15.52 |
|
|
|
Nitrogen Indus Dry D Size - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$2,107.58 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bozbuilt |
$120.69 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$6,218.63 |
|
|
|
Grease Gun Cartridge - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Waste Oil Levy - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Brian Zucal & Associates |
$962.50 |
|
|
|
Valuation Services - Leasing & Land |
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$357.04 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$18,653.92 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Buggybuddys |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Social Media Advertising - Healthy Communities |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$2,304.07 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited |
$126.42 |
|
|
|
Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Cancer Council WA |
$1,016.15 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$13,230.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$23,725.13 |
|
|
|
Yanchep Coastal Risk Management - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Design Peer Review - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Beach Survey Monitoring Services - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services Ending 26.12.2014 - Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management - Coastal Projects |
|
|
|
|
Cardno Geotech Pty Ltd |
$1,395.68 |
|
|
|
Graham Road & Beverley Road Material Test - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$4,790.73 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Material - Projects/ Engineering/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Castledex |
$717.20 |
|
|
|
Laser Label A5 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$18,258.90 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chadson Engineering Pty Ltd |
$231.00 |
|
|
|
Service/Calibration Palintest - Pooltest 9 - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$349.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Chemical Essentials Pty Ltd |
$754.60 |
|
|
|
Vet Disinfectant - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Chica Catering |
$2,030.00 |
|
|
|
Catering - Council Dinner 09.12.2014 - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$11,348.74 |
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance Server Tools - IT |
|
|
|
|
Travel Expense Recovery - Leanne Elphick - IT |
|
|
|
|
Training - Authority Administration Sessions 3 & 4 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$193.37 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$33,303.18 |
|
|
|
Processing Recyclables - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$164.20 |
|
|
|
Container Hire - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$1,603.19 |
|
|
|
Beverages For Kingsway Indoor Stadium/Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Collins Craft & School Supplies |
$50.71 |
|
|
|
Treasure Boxes - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$117.60 |
|
|
|
Volunteer National Police Checks October 2014 - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
Committee for Perth |
$6,050.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Local Government Membership February 2015 - January 2016 - Corporate Strategy |
|
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$974.48 |
|
|
|
Turfing - Graham Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Conway Highbury Pty Ltd |
$3,762.00 |
|
|
|
Review Of Local Law - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Courier Australia |
$79.12 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
COVS Parts |
$2,893.04 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Crommelins Machinery |
$163.53 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Data #3 Limited |
$2,065.85 |
|
|
|
Microsoft Office, Exchange Service & Windows Service Software - IT |
|
|
|
|
Computer Software - IT |
|
|
|
|
David Golf & Engineering Pty Ltd |
$22,335.50 |
|
|
|
Supply Tee Information Signs X 18 For Carramar Golf Course - Property |
|
|
|
|
Davidson Trahaire Corpsych Pty Limited |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - HR |
|
|
|
|
Davis Langdon Pty Ltd |
$5,277.80 |
|
|
|
Butler North District Plan Review - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
De Vita & Dixon Lawyers |
$9,198.20 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Dell Australia Pty Ltd |
$28,397.60 |
|
|
|
Dell Computers & Accessories - IT |
|
|
|
|
Dell Power Supply X 10 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Memory Module - IT |
|
|
|
|
Demon Detailing |
$451.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services - Community Transport Bus - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Key |
$1,566.00 |
|
|
|
Locking Services - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Locking Services - Riverlink Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Dick Smith Electronics |
$39.01 |
|
|
|
Belkin Cable - IT |
|
|
|
|
Diesel Gym Pty Ltd |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Boxing Program Excursion - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Digital Mapping Solutions - Perth |
$13,200.00 |
|
|
|
Intramaps Enterprise Annual Maintenance, Authoritylink Annual Maintenance & DMS Technical Support - IT |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$612.59 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Radio WN33401 - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Repairs To LCD Screen - Emergency |
|
|
|
|
Donald Cant Watts Corke (WA) Pty Ltd |
$23,650.00 |
|
|
|
Review Of Cost Plans - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$16,590.20 |
|
|
|
Emergency Call Out - Road Accident - Oil Spill & Sweeping Lenore Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Oil Cleanup - Speargrass Alexander Height - Waste |
|
|
|
|
DVA Fabrications |
$1,280.00 |
|
|
|
Shelving For Clarkson Library |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$582.35 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Eagle Boys Pizza Clarkson |
$73.65 |
|
|
|
Catering - Volunteers Fire Fighters Training - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Eagle Boys Pizza Wanneroo |
$65.55 |
|
|
|
Catering - Internal Staff Function - Capacity Building |
|
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Pty Ltd |
$158.40 |
|
|
|
Hydrolab Quanta - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Economic Development Australia Limited |
$6,269.30 |
|
|
|
Service Agreement - EDA Limited - Planning & Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Membership For N Searles & Macey - Planning & Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
e-Fire & Safety |
$192.50 |
|
|
|
Fire Extinguisher - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Elan Media Partners Pty Ltd |
$684.32 |
|
|
|
Adult & Junior Stock - Library |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Industrial Wholesalers |
$58.64 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$727.10 |
|
|
|
Service Iron Filters At Various Location - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Embroidme Malaga |
$2,776.40 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Emergency Services Report |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$10,023.76 |
|
|
|
Clean Up - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mowing/Slashing - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Bottle Brush - Yanchep & Two Rocks Estate - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Cut Bushes & Clean Up - Chrisp Place - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Various Works At Corner Of Connolly & Hinchenbrook Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Monthly Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$8,798.25 |
|
|
|
Ergonomic Equipment & Office Chairs - Injury Management |
|
|
|
|
ERS Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,449.80 |
|
|
|
Monthly Charges - Parts Washer - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Every Second Counts |
$375.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Warden WLCC - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Evolution Sound Productions |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Supply Sound System For The City Christmas Function - CEO Office |
|
|
|
|
Evolution Traffic Control Pty Ltd |
$3,949.99 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Elliot & Lenore Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Excalibur Printing |
$565.46 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Exceed Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Desktop And Safety Audit - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Experience Perth |
$12,888.65 |
|
|
|
2015 Sunset Coast Holiday Planner - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
Fawzak Pty Ltd |
$2,056.53 |
|
|
|
Magazines For Library |
|
|
|
|
Find Wise Location Services |
$402.05 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - East Road Pearsall - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA |
$121.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Epaulettes - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Forcorp Pty Ltd |
$2,926.00 |
|
|
|
Led Light - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Forpark Australia |
$2,189.00 |
|
|
|
Limestone Repair - Adora Playground - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Installation - Extra Charge For Limestone Work Highview Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd |
$586.08 |
|
|
|
Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Foxtel |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
Foxtel Subscriptions - Wanneroo Library |
|
|
|
|
Freds Hardware |
$910.74 |
|
|
|
Hardware Purchases For Engineering/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Friction Control |
$419.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$762.85 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd |
$849.33 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Gastech Australia |
$638.00 |
|
|
|
Service And Calibration Gas Detector - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$24,029.52 |
|
|
|
Tree Services - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ghems Holding Pty Ltd |
$26,202.00 |
|
|
|
Handweeding - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Reina |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Music Therapy Session 16.12.2014 - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Glenn Swift Entertainment |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainment Christmas Tales - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
GPR Truck Sales & Service |
$769.14 |
|
|
|
Wheel Alignments - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Grass Growers |
$8,800.33 |
|
|
|
Greenwaste For December 2014 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$1,705.00 |
|
|
|
Holding Fees - Cheltonday Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenway Enterprises |
$195.80 |
|
|
|
Felco Loppers - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Gymcare |
$1,027.39 |
|
|
|
Maintenance For Gym Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Gym Wipes - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$2,908.62 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Harmer News Pty Ltd |
$319.56 |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$2,695.15 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour - IT |
|
|
|
|
Hendercare |
$34,296.75 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CCACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$985.93 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Holton Connor Pty Ltd |
$20,147.60 |
|
|
|
Design Architectural Consultancy - Koondoola Community Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Home Chef |
$726.10 |
|
|
|
Meals For HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$8,664.26 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hosemart |
$36.37 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Engineering |
|
|
|
|
HS Hyde & Son |
$214.50 |
|
|
|
Additional Remote For ICV Shed At 14 Hidden Valley Return Clarkson - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$3,146.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hydramet Pty Ltd |
$4,752.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Safe Handling Of Chlorine Gas X 6 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
IKEA |
$53.65 |
|
|
|
Led Candle And Rechargeable Battery Packs - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
InfoCouncil Pty Ltd |
$8,866.00 |
|
|
|
Upgrade Of Infocouncil Version 6.2.10 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Infocouncil Annual Maintenance 18.01.2015 - 17.01.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Insight Call Centre Services |
$8,241.05 |
|
|
|
Call Centre Services - November 14 |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilets - Events |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$2,619.21 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
|
J.H. Fluid Transfer Solutions Pty Ltd |
$5,209.39 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses For Fleet Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Jacksons Drawing Supplies Pty Ltd |
$98.34 |
|
|
|
Board Mounting Foam - Heritage & Museums |
|
|
|
|
Jadu Software Pty Ltd |
$8,800.00 |
|
|
|
Live CMS Instance Pro Rata February 2015 - IT |
|
|
|
|
JAG Traffic Pty Ltd |
$858.00 |
|
|
|
Traffic Management Plan - Lenore Road /Nicholson Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$6,869.05 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
James Foley Illustrations |
$616.00 |
|
|
|
Attending Artist For Drawing |
|
|
|
|
JAS Oceania Pty Ltd |
$72.22 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Dog Training Club Incorporated |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Agility Demonstration 2014 - Events |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Drive Medical Centre |
$5,279.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Judy Rogers |
$560.00 |
|
|
|
Attending Artist For Drawing - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$10,912.99 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Rawlinson Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Kerbing - Graham Road & Beverley Crescent - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$849.48 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Emergency Call Oil Stain - Waste |
|
|
|
|
High Pressure Clean Up - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Kmart Australia Limited (Wanneroo) |
$618.00 |
|
|
|
Storage Boxes For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Equipment - School Holiday Program |
|
|
|
|
Various Equipment - Yanchep/Two Rocks Youth Centre |
|
|
|
|
Knight And Sons |
$548.86 |
|
|
|
Food For Animal Care Centre |
|
|
|
|
KPMG |
$30,904.50 |
|
|
|
Audit Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kristoffer Myhre |
$1,750.00 |
|
|
|
Report Presentation - Healthy Communities |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$15,267.48 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Printer - IT |
|
|
|
|
Colour Digital Multifunction Device - IT |
|
|
|
|
L & T Venables Pty Ltd |
$433.34 |
|
|
|
Various Items - WRC/Waste/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ladybirds Plant Hire |
$449.35 |
|
|
|
Rental Of Indoor Plants For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landmark Engineering & Design Pty Ltd |
$5,728.80 |
|
|
|
Install Sport Benches - Elliot Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Landsdale Mini Hardware & Boxes Galore |
$447.79 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$213.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen For Civic Functions |
|
|
|
|
Lawn Doctor |
$11,110.00 |
|
|
|
Sweeping Of Oval - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Supply & Apply Stamina 90 - Various Location - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$2,195.53 |
|
|
|
Maintenance December - Agonis - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mulch For Memorial - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Learning Horizons |
$7,920.00 |
|
|
|
Strategic Review - HR |
|
|
|
|
Learning Seat Pty Ltd |
$1,815.00 |
|
|
|
Base Fee December 2014 - HR |
|
|
|
|
Leisure Institute of WA Aquatics |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Liwa Aquatics Membership For Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$2,675.43 |
|
|
|
Group Fitness License Fee - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Lightforce Assets Pty Ltd |
$14,790.60 |
|
|
|
Install Guardrail - Alexandria - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Lovegrove Turf Services Pty Ltd |
$28,082.00 |
|
|
|
Turf Installation - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Fertilising Of Turf - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Lycopodium Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
$9,895.60 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Kingsway Baseball Clubrooms - Projects |
|
|
|
|
M J & S M Snow |
$49.17 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$2,935.52 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Express Pty Ltd |
$9,734.75 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Marquee Magic |
$283.00 |
|
|
|
Hire At Butler - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$49,806.08 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$7,150.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation Services - East Wanneroo Development Areas - Planning Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Melvyn Scholtz |
$322.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop - Screenprinting - Heights Community House |
|
|
|
|
Mercury Search & Selection Pty Ltd |
$9,240.00 |
|
|
|
E-Recruitment Monthly Software Fee January 2015 - HR |
|
|
|
|
System Change Requests - HR |
|
|
|
|
Meridian Services |
$8,043.05 |
|
|
|
Security Officers - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$682.50 |
|
|
|
Interactive Voice Recordings - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$107.36 |
|
|
|
Stationery Supplies - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Cash Register Co |
$236.06 |
|
|
|
Thermal Paper Rolls - Library |
|
|
|
|
Microchips Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,227.95 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$280.94 |
|
|
|
Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$224,283.79 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,039.08 |
|
|
|
Fuel - December 2014 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$677.60 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment Supplies - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mirco Bros Pty Ltd Oil Distributors |
$2,479.66 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Parks/Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Move It |
$211.75 |
|
|
|
Removal Services - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Mowmaster Turf Equipment |
$14,103.00 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
|
8 X Lawn Edgers - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Mr Robert Holmes |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainment At Alexander Heights Community Centre - Programs |
|
|
|
|
MTU Detroit Diesel Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,309.44 |
|
|
|
Parts For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Multispares |
$497.31 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$36,562.19 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Coir Mesh Brazier Road Fire Access Track - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Weed Control - Amstel Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Work - Various Locations - Infrastructure Assets |
|
|
|
|
Natureworks Packaging |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Waste Bags - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Newsxpress Ocean Keys |
$43.50 |
|
|
|
Newspapers/Periodicals - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Nick's Bus Charter |
$640.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Charter For Social Support |
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$2,969.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$26,075.95 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Minor Plant - Various - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Northside Painting Contractors |
$9,479.25 |
|
|
|
Anitslip Coating At Yanchep Boardwalk - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$867.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Windscreen X 3 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting |
$1,792.00 |
|
|
|
Beach Cleaning Quinns Beach - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$352.77 |
|
|
|
Monthly Maintenance Fees - Colourwave Printer - Projects |
|
|
|
|
OCP Sales - Omnific Enterprises P/L |
$41.25 |
|
|
|
Repairs To Radio - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$59,460.39 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Officemax |
$127.05 |
|
|
|
Patch Cables - IT |
|
|
|
|
Opus International Consultants (PCA) Ltd |
$6,101.60 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Connolly Drive Dualling - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Orica Australia P/L |
$295.99 |
|
|
|
Chlorine Gas - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group |
$8,801.84 |
|
|
|
Uniform Order - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies |
$1,620.00 |
|
|
|
Quantified Tree Risk Assessment - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Qtra Risk Assessment On Marrie - Cvitan Bend Madeley - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Paul Cox |
$306.70 |
|
|
|
Bury IP5 Cable - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Perth Process Service |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Service Letters Completed On 31.10.2014 - Legal Services |
|
|
|
|
Perth Sumo Suit And Inflatable Games Hire |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainment Butler Bonanza Event - Youth Development |
|
|
|
|
Perth Training Centre |
$528.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Confined Spaces And Working At Heights - M Bennett - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters |
$579.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Charter - Social Support |
|
|
|
|
Pharaohs Vending Services |
$101.52 |
|
|
|
Confectionery For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd |
$2,722.50 |
|
|
|
Fitness Classes - Aquamotion & Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Pintaudi Trust |
$397.10 |
|
|
|
Childcare Cert III - Jade Hills, Two Rocks Creche - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
PJ & CA Contracting |
$29,299.33 |
|
|
|
Barrier Gate Inspections - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sand Machine Cleaning - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Caps - Ripplevale - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Planex Sales Pty Ltd |
$493.55 |
|
|
|
Suspension Rolls - Infrastructure Assets |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$315.00 |
|
|
|
Power Shield Defender & Cables For IT |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$4,911.51 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$597.32 |
|
|
|
Printing - Swim School Flyers - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Interim Rating Flyers - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$82,068.10 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Promotionsonly |
$481.25 |
|
|
|
Printed - Volunteer Lanyards - Community Links |
|
|
|
|
Prompt Engineering Pty Ltd |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Structural Inspection - 11 Two Rocks - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Protector Alsafe |
$4,304.51 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Pulse Design |
$358.88 |
|
|
|
Updates To Poster, Terms & Conditions & Creation Of Instagram Competition Pages - Business Development |
|
|
|
|
Purely Property Services |
$3,539.50 |
|
|
|
Ensuite Renovation At Caretakers House At Carramar Golf Course - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Red Rooster Alexander Heights |
$277.19 |
|
|
|
Catering - Christmas Party - Alexander Heights Adult Day Centre |
|
|
|
|
Reinol WA |
$395.34 |
|
|
|
Hand Cleaner - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$11,932.43 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Renata Wright Art |
$560.00 |
|
|
|
Attending Artist For Drawing Workshop - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
Richgro |
$485.00 |
|
|
|
Various Products - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,574.78 |
|
|
|
Image Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Finance |
$3,294.50 |
|
|
|
Lease Printers - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$881.65 |
|
|
|
Line Marking - Connolly Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Pavement Markings - Quinns & Burn Streets - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Road Signs Australia |
$9,630.61 |
|
|
|
Sign - Mindarie Keys - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Parking - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Street Name Plates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Medical Centre - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Beach - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Various Reserves - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Stickers - Numeric Labelled - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Dog Beach - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Dog Exercise Area & No Dogs Past This Point - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Workman - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 Pty Ltd |
$97,056.48 |
|
|
|
Supply/Lay Road Materials - Various Locations - Projects/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Rowe Scientific Pty Ltd |
$981.20 |
|
|
|
Meter For Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$56.76 |
|
|
|
Spark Plugs - Stores |
|
|
|
|
RS Components Pty Ltd |
$37.74 |
|
|
|
Cables For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ryoka Elton |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Yoga & Meditation - Alexander Heights Day Club |
|
|
|
|
S & C Linemarking |
$1,713.80 |
|
|
|
Line Marking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Safety World |
$839.30 |
|
|
|
Safety Items - Various Departments |
|
|
|
|
Sage Consulting Engineers |
$962.50 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Kingsway Baseball Lighting - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$7,901.14 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Aquamotion/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Scorpion Training Solutions |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Health & Safety Representative |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$236.00 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$1,156.12 |
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Seamless (Aust) Pty Ltd |
$3,745.50 |
|
|
|
Hosting Services - IT |
|
|
|
|
Seton Australia |
$369.89 |
|
|
|
Emergency Signage - Various - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Sew & Go |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Uniform Alterations - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$1,108.75 |
|
|
|
Photometer - Health |
|
|
|
|
Various Chemicals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Sign Supermarket |
$734.50 |
|
|
|
Sign - Evacuation Centre - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Sign Synergy Pty Ltd |
$462.00 |
|
|
|
Application Of Film To Windows - Girrawheen Library - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$17,765.00 |
|
|
|
Emerald Park Investigation - Infrastructure Assets |
|
|
|
|
Skateboarding WA |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Roster Of Events - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Skyhigh Training Pty Ltd |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Elevating Work Platform 10.12.2014 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$10,334.21 |
|
|
|
One Off Litter Collection And Mowing - Wanneroo Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions |
$58.30 |
|
|
|
CD/DVD Cases - Library |
|
|
|
|
Soundworks Touring Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,355.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - Immigration Services & Union Fees - Artist For Global Beats & Eats Festival - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Source Machinery Pty Ltd |
$412.50 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Specialised Security Shredding |
$65.02 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Spider Waste Collection Services Pty Ltd |
$662.20 |
|
|
|
Collection Of Mattresses From Yard 24.12.2014 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Sports Turf Technology Pty Ltd |
$1,501.50 |
|
|
|
Nematode Testing - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sports World of WA |
$2,138.40 |
|
|
|
Goggles For Resale - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Spotlight Stores Pty Ltd |
$177.24 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$369.73 |
|
|
|
Spray Parts - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Squire Patton Boggs |
$2,990.90 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$297.66 |
|
|
|
First Aid Cover For Butler Bonanza - Marketing |
|
|
|
|
Standout Signs |
$715.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Signage - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
State Law Publisher |
$83.40 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Alert |
$522.50 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$749.79 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$748.96 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$5,819.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Alarm - Fleet Workshop |
|
|
|
|
Clean Drain - Fleet Waste Oil |
|
|
|
|
Sterihealth Services Pty Ltd |
$125.22 |
|
|
|
Delivery Of Sharpsmarts - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$2,893.41 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Stihl Shop Osborne Park |
$522.90 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Streetcut WA |
$319.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Cutting - Beverley - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sun Earth Murals |
$4,000.00 |
|
|
|
Completion Of Four Part Mural On Marine Ply For The Hainsworth Community Centre Girrawheen - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$1,544.40 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Broom Refills - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Supercrane Engineered Lifting Technology |
$930.60 |
|
|
|
Call Out - Repair Crane - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Drycleans and Laundrette |
$210.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades |
$1,517.00 |
|
|
|
Install Shade Sail - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Supply Shade Sail - Butler Community Centre - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Surekleen Products |
$389.95 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Surf Life Saving WA Incorporated |
$94,679.46 |
|
|
|
Lifeguard Contract - 2 X Months - Leisure Services |
|
|
|
|
Refresher Course - C Rudge - Funded Services |
|
|
|
|
Swan Towing Services Pty Ltd |
$2,377.10 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Swimmers World |
$153.50 |
|
|
|
Head Contour Paddles - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$12,614.88 |
|
|
|
GST Payable - December 2014 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Technifire 2000 |
$6,809.99 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Techwest Solutions Pty Ltd |
$2,563.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Aerobic Equipment With Correct Frequency - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Body Pack Transmitter And Receiver Kit - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Teknacool Marketing |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Kerb Numbers - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Tenderlink.com |
$577.50 |
|
|
|
Tender Advertising - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
The A J Harding Family Trust |
$1,018.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Your Guide To Perth And Fremantle - January 2015 - City Growth |
|
|
|
|
The Artists Foundation of WA |
$519.75 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Heritage, Museum & Arts |
|
|
|
|
The Community Network Australia Digital Advertising Networks |
$198.83 |
|
|
|
Advertising September For Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
The Red Book |
$1,810.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Subscription - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$1,234.20 |
|
|
|
Install Concrete Anchors - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia WA Branch Incorporated |
$37,814.33 |
|
|
|
Watch Around Water Mats & Wristbands - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
CPR Refresher - S Bernhard, K Butcher, C Fryters, D McGarry - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Home Pool Inspections - City Business |
|
|
|
|
Ropes & Log Books For Swimschool - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Training - Swim School Certificates Bronze X 6 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$1,060.41 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Various Departments |
|
|
|
|
Toolmart |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Jackhammer For Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Toyota Material Handling (WA) Pty Ltd |
$425.80 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$6,313.95 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Trisley's Hydraulic Services Pty Ltd |
$10,974.70 |
|
|
|
Washers X 100 - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Supply & Install Soda Ash Injection - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Replace Injector O-Rings - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Monthly Service Of Pool Filtration System - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$1,323.35 |
|
|
|
Service/Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turbotech Turbochargers |
$141.53 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$163,675.90 |
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance For Marangaroo & Carramar Golf Courses - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Installation Of Turf/Soil Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Tyrecycle Pty Ltd |
$3,932.28 |
|
|
|
Removal Of Used Tyres - WRC |
|
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$101.33 |
|
|
|
Various Items For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
United Equipment |
$183.70 |
|
|
|
Oil For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Universal Coatings WA |
$3,228.50 |
|
|
|
Powder Coating Of Library Shelves & Magazine Shelving - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
|
Veda Advantage Information Services & Solutions |
$250.25 |
|
|
|
Bureau Charges - PPSR Serial Number Searches December 2014 - Ranger Services |
|
|
|
|
Vertical Telecoms WA Pty Ltd |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Install Two Way Radio To WN 33536 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vetcare Innovation Pty Ltd |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Microchip 5 X Dog/Cat - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia 7 X Dog/Cat - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Vigilant Traffic Management Pty Ltd |
$6,502.65 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Lights - Wattle Avenue - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Vizcom Technologies |
$3,722.13 |
|
|
|
Service Contract - Governance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$2,109.76 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
WA Iveco |
$656.80 |
|
|
|
Service WN 31960 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$381.00 |
|
|
|
Heavy Duty Bag Rail - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
WA Local Government Association |
$2,612.92 |
|
|
|
Deskpad Calendar And Postage - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - Overseeing Quotations For Supply/Fitting Of Hose Assembly Services For Mobile Plant & Equipment - Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$368.00 |
|
|
|
Various Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Auto One |
$117.20 |
|
|
|
Lever Grease Gun - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$900.02 |
|
|
|
Fundraiser Auction Dinner 27.06.2014 X 10 Guests - Planning & Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$1,436.90 |
|
|
|
Catering - Training Course 29.11.2014 - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Catering - Gingin Fire - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Catering - Perry Road Fire - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Fuel For LT4 No Fuel Card - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
11 Canvas Bags For Holding Maps In Fire Trucks - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Annual Group Spaces For Quinns Rocks, Wanneroo Central & Two Rocks & Support - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Catering - Perry Road Fire - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Districts Cricket Club Incorporation |
$32,448.88 |
|
|
|
Contribution - Management And Preparation Turf Wickets - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$49,321.55 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo IGA |
$82.74 |
|
|
|
Huggies Swimmer Nappies - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$14,772.34 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$5,027.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Towing Abandoned Vehicles - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Trophy Shop |
$55.90 |
|
|
|
Rubber Stamp - Governance |
|
|
|
|
Wavesound Pty Ltd |
$492.56 |
|
|
|
Subscription For Indiflix - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$464.20 |
|
|
|
Grease Trap - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$32,708.50 |
|
|
|
Transport - Refuse From WRC |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$561.44 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
White Oak Home Care Services Pty Ltd |
$41,342.31 |
|
|
|
Support Services HACC/CACP Clients |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$1,135.22 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Worldwide Online Printing |
$462.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Labels - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002157 |
28/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Anne Condo |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment - Activity Assistant |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$1,138.08 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges - December Lodged |
|
|
|
|
Clarkson Little Athletics Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
DFES |
$34,426.67 |
|
|
|
50% Cost Sharing For The Community Fire Manager - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valeriani |
$53.45 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Gregory Johnson |
$251.25 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Inglewood United Soccer Club |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Joe Arrigo |
$117.60 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment - December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Kinross Cricket Club |
$569.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 4 Children |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Kinross Jnr Football Club |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Kingsway United Christian Football Club Incorporated |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 4 Children |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$7,832.11 |
|
|
|
Land Enquiries For The City - Various Department |
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - Rates |
|
|
|
|
Mr John Baker |
$80.20 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Paul Trandos |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - National Refrigerant Handling Licence - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ron Hoffman |
$140.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Vernon Mortensen |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Janette Rafferty |
$208.50 |
|
|
|
Keyholder/Tennis Booking Officer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Kim Forrestal |
$80.20 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Ms Deanne Hetherington |
$112.15 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Ms Resmie Greer |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Mobile Phone January - December 2014 - Regulatory Services |
|
|
|
|
Peggy Brown |
$133.65 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payment |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Rock Bush Fire Brigade |
$593.53 |
|
|
|
Catering Cost For Structural Fire |
|
|
|
|
Riding For The Disabled Association Of WA Incorporated |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$158.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Venetians Netball Club Incorporated |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 3 Children |
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Messaging |
$3,141.55 |
|
|
|
SMS Messaging Alerts - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo BMX Raceway Club |
$293.46 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 2 Children |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$87,608.00 |
|
|
|
Streetlight - 18 Bream Way - Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Reconnection Of Power - Marchwood Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Reconnection Of Power - Coniston Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Design Fee - 23 Dundebar Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Relocation Of Asset - Flynn Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002158 |
28/01/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amcap Distribution Centre |
$239.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Automotive Personnel |
$1,758.35 |
|
|
|
Casual Mechanic - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$706.76 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services |
|
|
|
|
Bolinda Digital Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Solution And Service Fee - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd |
$33,930.60 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Hocking Community Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Brian Zucal & Associates |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation Of 44 Mullingar Way - Remnant Drainage Site - Property |
|
|
|
|
Bridging the Gap |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Time Management X 2 For M Goode & O Bravo - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,070.00 |
|
|
|
Traffic Management Study - T Latm - Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$9,392.25 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Catalyse Pty Ltd |
$12,210.00 |
|
|
|
Final 30% Fees - Community And Business Perceptions Survey - Risk & Business Improvement |
|
|
|
|
Dana Weeks |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Services - Portrait Shoot - Remember When Project - Healthy Communities |
|
|
|
|
ENZED Perth |
$127.13 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts For Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$66.45 |
|
|
|
Copy Holder Desktop - HR |
|
|
|
|
Fence Hire WA |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Temporary Mesh Fence - Wanneroo Community Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,012.09 |
|
|
|
Gloves For Stores |
|
|
|
|
Initial Hygiene |
$5,064.64 |
|
|
|
Hygienic Services - November 2014 - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Road Safety Audit - November 2014 - Projects |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$392.76 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Eyles |
$840.00 |
|
|
|
Drawing Room Attending Artist X 12 - Heritage |
|
|
|
|
KDAire Mechanical Services |
$634.68 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
KPMG |
$48,730.00 |
|
|
|
Internal Audit - October, November & December 2014 - Risk & Business Improvement |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$786.56 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
M J & S M Snow |
$449.49 |
|
|
|
Cooling System Press - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Express Pty Ltd |
$14,643.70 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers And Solicitors |
$41,915.39 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$331,416.17 |
|
|
|
Refusal Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$1,237.50 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Yanchep Foreshore - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Northern Districts Pest Control |
$159.50 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Office Cleaning Experts |
$1,770.34 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
PAC Fire Australia |
$2,851.20 |
|
|
|
Bushmaster Foam - Emergency |
|
|
|
|
Pacific Brands Workwear Group |
$412.28 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniform For The City |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$247.00 |
|
|
|
Microsoft Wireless Comfort Keyboard - Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$1,216.60 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$8,346.75 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
RSPCA WA Incorporated |
$443.03 |
|
|
|
Pound Fees - December 2014 - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$1,988.69 |
|
|
|
Lift Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Streamline Trust |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Newspapers - Two Rocks Library |
|
|
|
|
Terpkos Engineering Pty Ltd |
$4,466.00 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 3 - Retaining Walls Lots 545 To 549 Opportunity Street - Property |
|
|
|
|
Turbotech Turbochargers |
$54.05 |
|
|
|
Silicon Hose - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$7,586.70 |
|
|
|
Supply/Install Turf - Marangaroo Golf Course - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Primary School |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment - Banners - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade |
$872.10 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Parts For Fire Truck - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Tyrecycle Pty Ltd |
$874.72 |
|
|
|
Removal Of Used Tyres & Conveyor Belt - WRC |
|
|
|
|
University of Western Australia |
$3,725.40 |
|
|
|
Profile Survey - Quinns Rocks Beach & Two Rocks Beach - Coastal Protection |
|
|
|
|
Visions Photography |
$5,600.00 |
|
|
|
Photography Of Art Collection - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Vizcom Technologies |
$3,533.41 |
|
|
|
Service And Support Contract 2015 Quarterly Charge - Governance |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$4,653.00 |
|
|
|
Works At Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$61.50 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$1,112.10 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Plumbing |
$87.45 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
YMCA Of Perth Youth And Community Services |
$2,090.00 |
|
|
|
Drug Aware Skate Series 2014 / 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002159 |
28/01/2015 |
Squire Patton Boggs |
$7,614.20 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees - Mindarie Breakwaters - Legal Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFT's |
$8,466,286.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK PURCHASING CARDS |
|||
|
00002155 |
20/01/2015 |
National Australia Bank - October 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Cafe Elixir - In House Catering Requests |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Wanneroo - In House Catering Requests |
$776.68 |
|
|
|
D & A Food Pty Ltd - In House Catering Requests |
$93.40 |
|
|
|
Kmart Wanneroo - In House Catering Requests |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Liquor Land Wanneroo - In House Catering Requests |
$205.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - In House Catering Requests |
$330.12 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Supa IGA - In House Catering Requests |
$30.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
|
|
Liquid Learning Group - Women In Local Governance Leadership Summit 02 - 03.12.2014 - A Ramachandran |
$1,754.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Materials |
$100.69 |
|
|
|
Kwik On Demand Transport - Contract Crane |
$467.78 |
|
|
|
Yanchep Liquor And General Store - Food - Meeting |
$23.65 |
|
|
|
Woolworths Carramar - Food - Prescribed Burn |
$75.00 |
|
|
|
Duvas - Food - Prescribed Burn |
$269.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Auckland Museum Shop Book Stock |
$149.28 |
|
|
|
Boffins Bookshop - Local Stock Purchases |
$674.98 |
|
|
|
Bookdepository.Com - Book Stock |
$233.47 |
|
|
|
Caltex Woolworths - Fuel For Courier Van |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Chifley Suites Auckland - Accommodation To Attend Conference And Study Tour - W Robyn |
$1,009.72 |
|
|
|
Conference Innovators Ltd - Refund For External Tour Booked During Conference But Not Undertaken |
-$8.90 |
|
|
|
Dymocks Whitford City - Book Stock |
$179.57 |
|
|
|
Educational Concepts - Junior Stock For Yanchep Library |
$526.52 |
|
|
|
Esquires Waterfront - Meal Purchased During Library Study Tour - W Robyn |
$9.04 |
|
|
|
Fullers Pier 1 - Ferry Ticket To Waiheke Island As Part Of Library Study Tour - W Robyn |
$33.05 |
|
|
|
Fullers Star Flyte - Meal Purchased During Library Study Tour - W Robyn |
$4.87 |
|
|
|
Goode Brothers Botany - Lunch While On Library Study Tour - W Robyn |
$15.09 |
|
|
|
Holiday Bargains - Taxi From Accommodation To Airport - Return Journey From Library Conference / Study Tour - W Robyn |
$77.10 |
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi - Purchase Of New Stereo For Workroom |
$138.00 |
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Whitford - Stock |
$89.96 |
|
|
|
Mojo Gallery - Food And Drink Whilst In Auckland For Lianza Conference - W Robyn |
$8.64 |
|
|
|
NZC Taxi - Transport From Airport To Accommodation For Lianza Conference Attendance - W Robyn |
$85.30 |
|
|
|
Sky City Sky Lounge - Food And Drink Whilst In Auckland Attending Lianza Conference - W Robyn |
$10.46 |
|
|
|
Solar Eating House - Meal While On Library Conference / Tour - W Robyn |
$10.56 |
|
|
|
Syba Signs Pty Ltd - Genre Labels (Indigenous Flag) |
$15.95 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Water Bottles For Yanchep Library |
$54.00 |
|
|
|
UWA Publishing - Book Stock |
$101.83 |
|
|
|
Wildfire - Dinner While In Auckland For Study Tour - W Robyn |
$31.86 |
|
|
|
Wilsons Sign Solution - Signage For The Magazine Shelving At Wanneroo Library |
$1,559.80 |
|
|
|
Woolworths Carramar - Xmas Token Gift For 180 Books On Wheels Patrons & Volunteers |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Action Lock Service - Locking Services |
$19.50 |
|
|
|
Autopower Car Paint - Acrylic Primer Grey |
$170.50 |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware - Various |
$700.11 |
|
|
|
Bristol Joondalup - Paint Supplies |
$287.88 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$1,969.32 |
|
|
|
Ceiling Supermarket - Hardware Purchases |
$299.38 |
|
|
|
CSR Gyprock - Hardware Purchases |
$177.80 |
|
|
|
Hamilton Sawmills - Jarrah Dry Dressed |
$49.50 |
|
|
|
Laminex Group Pty Ltd - Redback 7mm Natural Charcoal |
$814.95 |
|
|
|
Safety World - Credit Note - Earplugs On INV 84362 |
-$7.70 |
|
|
|
Solver Decorator - Paint Supplies |
$1,120.56 |
|
|
|
Western Power - Design Fee - 13 Sinagra St Wanneroo |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Araldite Adhesive Quick Set |
$45.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Crate And Pitch Fork For Impound Yard |
$33.52 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Cat Litter And Food |
$126.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchasing Cards Transactions |
$18,004.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EFT's And Purchasing Cards |
$8,484,290.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 1 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.23 |
|
|
|
Cell 2 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.23 |
|
|
|
Cell 3 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory - Legal Fees |
$5,283.41 |
|
|
|
Dryka Consulting Engineers - 185 Mary Street |
$4,390.00 |
|
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees |
$15,884.80 |
|
|
|
Cell 6 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 7 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees |
$15,884.80 |
|
|
|
Cell 9 |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property - Valuation Services |
$722.22 |
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing - Trackside Fencing - Kingsway |
$364.80 |
|
|
|
Berkley |
|
|
|
|
McLeods Barristers & Solicitors - Legal Fees |
$1,303.20 |
|
|
|
Brian Zucal & Associates - Legal Fees |
$875.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
$50,486.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
|
100449 |
09.12.2014 |
Devina Sandler-Cook |
-520.00 |
|
93817 |
10.09.2013 |
Helene Coate |
-10.00 |
|
93816 |
10.09.2013 |
Kerry Smithson |
-10.00 |
|
99237 |
16.09.2014 |
Mr Justin Langridge |
-2505.32 |
|
100341 |
02.12.2014 |
Grant Logomai Tina & Jaylene-Faye Hine Hana Ka Anaru |
-251.60 |
|
100554 |
16.12.2014 |
Disability Services Commission - North |
-520.00 |
|
100224 |
25.11.2014 |
Percy John Walsh & Alice Walsh |
-689.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOSUM TOTAL |
-$4,506.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund Bank Account |
|||
|
|
|
Payroll Payments November 2014: |
|
|
|
|
06.01.2015 |
$1,633,852.37 |
|
|
|
12.01.2015 |
$14,468.36 |
|
|
|
20.01.2015 |
$1,595,248.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll Total |
$3,243,569.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00002151 |
15/01/2015 |
Bank Reconciliation November 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Pooling Maintenance Fee |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$212.33 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$8,721.88 |
|
|
|
CBA Pos Fee |
$408.09 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fees Debtors |
$105.95 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fees Rates |
$7,745.10 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Fees Debtors |
$34.90 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Fees Rates |
$435.43 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$346.85 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$154.50 |
|
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$636.94 |
|
|
|
Aquamotion Direct Debit Return Fees |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
WRC Envelope Fee |
$45.00 |
|
|
|
Returned Payroll Fee |
$2.50 |
|
|
|
Auspost Dishonoured Cheque |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees |
$19,009.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Credit Cards November 2014 |
|
|
|
|
F BENTLEY |
|
|
|
|
Annual Credit Card Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Coles - Funded Services CBDC Client Meals |
$461.03 |
|
|
|
Coles - Funded Services CBDC Pantry |
$190.86 |
|
|
|
Community History Subscription - Find My Past |
-$510.88 |
|
|
|
Community Links - Little Free Library Charter Sign |
$46.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N JENNINGS |
|
|
|
|
Annual Credit Card Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M YILDIZ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Credit Card Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C MORRISON |
|
|
|
|
WA Alterations Workshop - S Serafin, C Steele, R Forrest, B Sciaresa, I Curry |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - ELM Team Building Bus Tour |
$42.60 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$11.00 |
|
|
|
WA Major Projects Conference 2015 – C Morrison |
$953.70 |
|
|
|
Annual Credit Card Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
E-learning Work In Emergency Management - C Morrison |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Enrolment Fee - Diploma Of Work Health & Safety - L Triscari |
$1,750.00 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - OSH Team Celebration Of Audit Results (CoW Staff) |
$384.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D SIMMS |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting With Cr Winton 08.09.2014 |
$20.30 |
|
|
|
Deposit - Attendance At LGPA European Study Tour 27.05.2015 To 07.06.2015 |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$93.01 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting With Director General Of Department Of Planning 16.09.2014 |
$14.60 |
|
|
|
Boffin Books - CEO Resource |
$155.88 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting F Hodges As Candidate For Director 30.09.2014 |
$56.35 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting With Learning Horizons Consultant For Organisation Structural Review 06.10.2014 |
$65.30 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Elected Members Beverages |
$984.68 |
|
|
|
Airfares - Local Government Planners Association European Tour 2015 |
$1,864.36 |
|
|
|
Conference Expenses - Hospitality - NGAA Congress Adelaide 15 -17.10.2014 - Mayor T Roberts, Cr L Aitken, Cr B Treby, D Simms A Bostock, S Marmion |
$216.50 |
|
|
|
Conf. Exp - Cab Charges - NGAA Congress Adelaide 15 - 17.10.2014 - Mayor T Roberts, D Simms, Cr B Treby, Cr L Aitken, A Bostock, S Marmion |
$84.47 |
|
|
|
Conference Expenses - Parking Perth Airport 17.10.2014 |
$5.00 |
|
|
|
Conference Expenses - Hotel Accommodation - NGAA Congress Adelaide 15 - 17.10.2014 - Cr Treby, D Simms, A Bostock, S Marmion, Mayor Roberts, Cr L Aitken |
$3,345.57 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting With Water Corporation 21.10.2014 |
$14.40 |
|
|
|
Parking - Meeting With WALGA Employee Relations Officer |
$8.90 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Executive Leadership Team Tour Of The City |
$27.00 |
|
|
|
Hospitality - Meeting With Professor Cobie Rudd Of ECU |
$15.60 |
|
|
|
Annual Bank Fees |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Hotel Accommodation For NGAA - Councillor & CEO |
-$22.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D BLAIR |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute Of Management – D Simmons |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P ST JOHN |
|
|
|
|
Airline Airfare/Booking Fee - M Dickson - European Study Tour |
$1,702.32 |
|
|
|
Credit Card Annual Fees |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$38.40 |
|
|
|
Annual Subscription – Survey Monkey 06.11.2014 - 05.11.2015 |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Syt Info Session |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
UDIA - Hot Topics Forum |
$85.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PURCHASING OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
Woolworths Gift Card - Meals For Alexander Heights CBDC |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Card - Pantry Card - Wanneroo Day Club |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Card - Delivery Fee - Pantry Card - Wanneroo Day Club |
$11.42 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Card - Lunch Card - Kookaburra Club |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Card - Delivery Fee Lunch Card - Kookaburra Club |
$3.43 |
|
|
|
A Absolute Office Centre - Portable Lectern |
$335.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Subscription Campaign Monitor For City E-Newsletters |
$381.26 |
|
|
|
Hamper For Cr D Hayden - Joondalup Hospital |
$113.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Credit Card Fee |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Coles/Myer Gift Cards |
$1,050.00 |
|
|
|
Coles/Myer Gift Cards - Delivery Fee |
$14.85 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Cards - Active Aging - Lunch For Mini Olympics - Funded Services Programs |
$741.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Cards - Client Lunches/Pantry - Quinn's |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Cards Delivery Fee - Client Lunches - Quinn's |
$14.85 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Cards - Pantry Card - The Heights |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Bar Fridge - Financial Counselling - Merriwa |
$299.00 |
|
|
|
Kmart Gift Card - Wanneroo Day Club |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Coles Gift Cards - 2 X Lunch Card - Wanneroo Day Club |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths Gift Card - Food & Beverages - Activities @ Yanchep Community Centre |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Card Payments |
$22,075.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup January 2015 |
$9,859,602.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payment Total (Includes Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$9,900,687.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Paid - Municipal Fund |
$13,144,257.27 |
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 365
File Ref: 12606 – 15/38888
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 January 2015.
Background
In accordance with Local Government Regulations, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
“1) Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare each month a statement of financial activity, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. For the 2014/15 financial year Council will present the statement of financial activity by nature and type.
2) Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2014/15 financial year Council will use 10% for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
The Financial Activity Statement and January 2015 year to date financial performances of the City are detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the commentaries on 10% variances to adopted budget in the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 January 2015 are provided below. It should be noted that there are no amendments to the adopted budget year to date.
During January a mid-year review of the budget was undertaken, which involved assessing December 2014 year-to-date figures against budget and projecting expected year-end results for all operating accounts and capital projects (alongside the current year corporate business plan actions). The outcome of this review will be duly reported to the 10 March 2015 Audit Committee meeting.
While the mid year review has been completed by business units, adoption has not yet been made pending council review. The January report therefore still reflects the variance which will be in line with budgets once the mid year review process is completed and reflected in the February report.
Income Statement (Refer to Attachment 1)
Net Result $ million
Year to Date Actual 80.427
Year to Date Budget Estimate 67.624
Year to Date Variance +12.803 (+19%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 52.938
The following information is provided on key aspects of the year to date financial results:
Revenues $ million
Year to Date Actual 146.650
Year to Date Budget Estimate 146.200
Year to Date Variance 0.450 (0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 167.084
Fees and Charges
As at January 2015 the variance to year-to-date budget for the Fees and Charges Income category is reported as being -12% (-$1.687 million). The main contributing factor relates to the change being undertaken in handling of recyclable waste from the Wangara Recycling Facility (WRC). Furthermore, outstanding charges to the Cities of Swan and Joondalup from the Wangara Recycling Facility are still to be raised pending the outcome of the audit of the facilities operations for which a meeting has been scheduled with the partners in March to determine.
Other Revenue
The Other Revenue income category represents a year to date
variance to budget of -48%
(-$1.092 million). As per previous months the main contributor is the lower
than anticipated sales revenue of commodity products from the Wangara Recycling
Centre (WRC) which represents a major component of the annual adopted
budget. Hence with the WRC ceasing production in November 2014 this will
have a material effect on budgets. As at the end of January $0.881 million has
been received from these sales, out of a year to date budget of
$1.866 million. It is noted that WRC income and expenses for
2014/2015 were budgeted for the full year business as usual operations, hence
the related financial and budget implications of the change will be reflected
and reported to Council as part of the mid-year review.
Expenses $ million
Year to Date Actual 89.079
Year to Date Budget Estimate 97.359
Year to Date Variance +8.280 (+9%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 167.063
Employee Costs
For the year to January the employee costs show a variance of 10% (+$4.163 million) to budget. This is due to vacancies whilst new staff are recruited resulting in lower salary expenditure than budgeted, together with a timing difference between transfers of payroll payments. Additionally, unexpended budgets have resulted from the ceasing of operations of the WRC. Close analysis of the salaries, wages and other associated employee costs is currently taking place with resulting amendments to be reporting to Council in the mid-year review report.
Materials and Contracts
Reflected under the category of Materials and Contracts is a variance to year to date budget of +$4.896 million (+17%). Whilst this variance is considered material in value, it is not unusual for differing levels of expenditures to be reflected at various times of the year due to seasonal activities, hence higher levels are expected over coming months. A thorough review of accounts was conducted in January in relation to the mid year review. The two biggest contributors to these expenses are Refuse Removal Expenses and Contract Expenses, as at January month end their year to date expenditures are $5.949 million and $9.098 million respectively, reflecting a combined variance to year to date budget of $3.090 million (+17%).
Interest Expenses
The year to December presents a variance of +$0.275 million (+15%). This is explained through the comparison of the monthly phasing of the annual budget vs. the periodical payments scheduled to be made to Western Australia Treasury Corporation (WATC) as per the City's loan agreement. Interest payments are made in the months of August, November, February and May. Since there is no payment scheduled in December, the budget includes a month's expense which will not be realised until February when the next interest payment is made.
Utilities
The utility charges is currently below budget by $0.643 million (+14%).This is mainly due to some electricity services that have already taken place are yet to be receipted into the purchasing system in the following months. Respective units involved have been reminded to perform system receipting on a timely manner.
Depreciation
Depreciation is currently reflecting an over budget scenario of -$2.170 million (-12%). This is due to the fair valuation revaluation impacts which led to the City's infrastructure assets to be valued as $1.6 billion post the 2013/14 financial audit; when the budgeted figures were based on a $1.1 billion portfolio. The full year figures will be correspondingly amended post mid year review adoption. Whilst these figures have no cash impacts, the substantial increase of depreciation amounts reflect the upcoming challenges on the City to maintain our assets and to closely monitor our asset renewal gaps.
Insurance
The City has recorded $1.354 million against insurance expenditures to the end of January, which lower than the year to date budget by 11%. With the majority of the annual premiums having been paid, the remaining budget will be for an excess allowance for potential claims. It is recognised that this allowance is difficult to accurately budget for and phase over the year however through the forthcoming mid-year review an overall budget reduction is likely.
Other Revenue and Expenses $ million
(Excluding Contributions of Physical Assets)
Revenue in excess of expenses:
Year to Date Actual 22.856
Year to Date Budget Estimate 18.783
Year to Date Variance +4.073 (+22%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 22.917
Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Expenses
TPS Expenses as at January month end continue to reflect low activities being $0.764 million YTD, representing a +78% variance (+$2.673 million) to year to date budget. These expenditures relate to specific costs and land purchases within the Scheme location and have no impact on municipal accounts.
Contributions of Physical Assets $ million
Year to Date Actual 0.000
Year to Date Budget Estimate 0.000
Year to Date Variance 0.000 (0%)
Full Year Adopted Budget 30.000
Each year developers hand over physical assets such as parklands, roads and pathways to the City, for its ongoing management and control. These assets can be of considerable value and are currently being finalised and booked to the accounts. It should be noted that variations on the amounts of contributions of physical assets comparing to budget has no direct impact to the City’s current financial year results, but can have a significant impact on future servicing, maintenance and renewal costs needing to be factored into the Long Term Financial Plan. The scale of the value of assets handed over to the City in the past has generally aligned closely to the % increase in the number of new Lots created during the financial year.
Balance Sheet (Refer to Attachment 2)
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program as of 31 January 2015 is summarised below by Program Category:-
The table above notes a total Annual Budget for the capital works program as $87.691 million. As at the end of January $23.173 million has been spent against capital works. In addition to the actual expenditure, $15.569 million is recognised as committed. (Note: Commitments are life to date and may also relate to future financial periods). To further progress activities additional resources will be allocated in coming months, noting that this will have no adverse effect on budgets (included within approved project budgets).
To further expand on the capital works program information above, key infrastructure projects are selected to be reported on, on a regular basis, which are listed in the following table.
Investment Portfolio Summary (Refer to Attachment 3)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the City only invests in the following highly secured investments effective from 1 August 2012:
1. Deposits with authorised deposit taking institutions and the Western Australian Treasury Corporation for a term not exceeding 12 months;
2. Bonds that are guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government or a State or Territory for a term not exceeding three years; and
3. Australian currency.
As at 31 January 2015, the City holds an investment portfolio (cash and cash equivalents) of $313.074 million. Interest earnings were budgeted at 3.50% yield. For the financial year to date ending January 2015, Council’s investment portfolio return has exceeded the bank bill index benchmark by 0.84% pa (3.56% pa vs. 2.72% pa).
Displayed below are graphical representations of the portfolio performance and earnings:
Note: Interest Earnings = Interest on investments plus Rates Instalment and Penalty Income.
Rate Setting Statement (Refer to Attachment 4)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 4 represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the surplus/(deficit), primarily based on the operations and capital works revenue and expenditure, and resulting rating income required.
Overall Comment
The Operating Result for the City to January month end presents an overall favourable variance of +$8.730 million (+18%) to year to date budget. Operating Income presented a marginal favourable variance to year to date budget of +$0.450 million (0%). Expenditures from Operations also present a favourable variance to budget of +$8.280 million (+9%) with the main contributor being Materials and Contracts (+$4.896 million) and Employee costs (+$4.163 million).
Activities within the Capital Works Program reflect increased levels to the period ending January 2015 with $23.173 million recorded to account.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statements and commentaries on variances to Year to Date Budget for the period ended 31 January 2015, consisting of:
1. 2014/15 Annual Adopted Budget;
2. January 2015 Year to Date Budget;
3. January 2015 Year to Date Income and Expenditures;
4. January 2015 Year to Date Material Variance Notes; and
5. January 2015 Year to Date Net Current Assets.
Attachments:
|
1. |
January Income Statement |
15/40078 |
Minuted |
|
2. |
January Balance Sheet |
15/40081 |
Minuted |
|
3. |
January Inv |
15/40092 |
Minuted |
|
4. |
January Rate Setting Statement |
15/40154 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 379
Risk and Business Improvement
File Ref: 7312 – 15/38079
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To present the revised Terms of Reference for the Audit Committee to Council for adoption.
Background
Changes to the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 (the Regulations) introduced additional requirements under clauses 16(c) and 17 for the Chief Executive Officer and the Audit Committee respectively in relation to oversight of the results of reviews pertaining to the systems and procedures related to risk management, internal controls and legislative compliance.
A report incorporating the new legislative requirements and possible amendments in terms of the structure, membership, delegations, representation, functions and reporting requirements of the Audit Committee was presented at the Audit Committee meeting of 19 March 2013, where it was noted that a review of the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Audit Committee would be undertaken for Council consideration.
Detail
At the Special Audit Committee meeting of 3 June 2014, the Administration presented a report with a proposed approach for meeting the new Regulations of which Audit Committee resolved as follows:
"That Audit Committee:
1. NOTES the roles and responsibilities of the Administration and the Audit Committee in meeting the requirements of the amended Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996; and;
2. ENDORSES the proposed approach and timeframe for meeting these requirements over the next two years, and reporting of outcomes to Council from these reviews."
A revised ToR was presented to Council Forum on 26 August 2014 for consideration. It was determined at this meeting that the proposed changes relating to a reduction in membership numbers and the inclusion of an external member on the Committee were not supported.
The revised ToR was presented to the Audit Committee on 10 February 2015. At this meeting further discussion and feedback was obtained in relation to the timeframe for notice of meetings and circulation of agenda and the duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee as listed below:
The Audit Committee recommended to Council -
“the adoption of the revised Terms of Reference as shown in Attachment 1 subject to :
a) amendment under Meetings (third bullet point) to read as "A Notice of ordinary meetings including an agenda will be circulated to the committee members at least 7 days prior to each meeting where possible.
b) amendment under Duties and Responsibilities (eleven bullet point) to include and read as " To review the appropriateness of special internal audit assignments undertaken by internal auditor at the request of Council or CEO unless the circulation of these assignments is prohibited by law from further circulation."
The ToR has been redrafted to incorporate the Audit Committee recommendations as detailed above. If Members support the above recommendation, the ToR will include this amendment.
Consultation
The ToR has been redrafted in consultation with the City's Internal Auditors (KPMG) and discussions were also held with peer Metropolitan local governments to draw comparisons and to consider the merits of alternative practices.
The Council forum held on 26 August 2014 provided opportunity for consultation and feedback from Elected Members on the revised ToR. Further, the revised ToR was presented to the Audit Committee meeting of 10 February 2015 with further amendments recommended.
Comment
The adoption of the ToR will provide clear guidelines on the appointment, function and responsibilities of the City's Audit Committee.
Statutory Compliance
The ToR has been reviewed to ensure conformance with Section 7.1A of the Local Government Act 1995 and Sections 16 and 17 of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
Updating the ToR to reflect the additional requirements of the amended Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 will reduce the relevant compliance risks and further enhance the Audit Committee's oversight and scrutiny of the City's operations.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ADOPTS the revised Terms of Reference – Audit and Risk Committee, as detailed in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Revised Terms of Reference Audit Committee February 2015 |
13/25515 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 387
Governance
File Ref: 1919 – 15/45115
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To nominate four Elected Members of the Council, comprising two local members and two alternate (deputy) local members to sit on the joint Development Assessment Panel (DAP) comprising the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and Stirling.
Background
In March 2009, the Department of Planning (DoP) released the “Building a Better Planning System” consultation paper and in September 2009, the Minister for Planning announced the release of a discussion paper “Implementing Development Assessment Panels in Western Australia”. The discussion paper expressed a clear State Government mandate to introduce DAPs in Western Australia and set out the DAP model that the State was considering for implementation.
The legislation required to enact the State Government’s DAP model was gazetted on 24 March 2011 and on 1 July 2011, fifteen DAPs (including the North West DAP comprising of the Cities of Joondalup, Stirling and Wanneroo) came into operation in order to determine applications that meet a certain threshold value.
Detail
In accordance with Regulation 26 of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011 Council is required to nominate four Elected Members comprising two local members and two alternate local members. Council at its meeting of 5 February 2013 nominated Councillor Gray and Mayor Roberts as Delegates and Councillors Cvitan and Mackenzie as deputy delegates to represent the City on the North West DAP. Subsequent to the Elected Member elections in 2013, Council at its special Council meeting of 29 October 2013 nominated Councillors Cvitan and Driver as Delegates and Councillor Winton and Mayor Roberts as deputy delegates to represent the City on the North West DAP.
If as a result of the local government elections, Elected Members appointed to a DAP are not re-elected, then the deputy member will take their place until such time as a replacement is appointed by Council. If both the appointed and deputy local members are not re-elected then Council will need to expeditiously re-nominate two Elected Members for the Minister’s consideration of appointment.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The Director General of the DoP wrote to the City on 18 December 2014 advising that appointments of all local government DAP members expire on 26 April 2015. Members whose term has expired will be eligible for re-consideration.
Notwithstanding that Council was required to provide its nominations to the DoP by Friday 27 February 2015, Administration has requested, and been approved an extension to 4 March 2015 to provide its nominations.
Appointed local members will be placed on a register maintained by the Minister and advised of relevant training dates and times. Training is mandatory for DAP members however local government representatives who have previously been appointed to the DAP and have received training are not required to attend further training. Local DAP members are entitled to be paid for their attendance at DAP training and DAP meetings.
Following receipt of all local government nominations, the Minister for Planning will consider and appoint all nominees.
For Elected Members’ to note, in 2014 there were 14 meetings of the North West DAP that included the City of Wanneroo.
Statutory Compliance
DAPs membership is pursuant to the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011.
Strategic Implications
The proposal accords with the following Outcome Objective of the City’s Strategic Plan 2006 – 2021:
“4 Governance
4.6 Provide and maintain a high standard of governance and accountability”
“3 Economic
3.2 Support business and initiatives”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There are no direct costs to the City arising from Council’s nomination of four Elected Members as the City’s local and deputy members on the North West DAP.
DAP local members receive the payments (attendance fees) set out below for attendance at each of the following meetings/training sessions:
· $400 for attending a meeting to determine development applications;
· $50 for attending a meeting to determine applications to amend or cancel approvals;
· $400 for attending proceedings in State Administrative Tribunal; and
· $400 for attending a training session.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council pursuant to Regulation 26 of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011 PROVIDES the Minister for Planning with the following nominations for Local Members and Alternative (Deputy) Local Members for the joint Development Assessment Panel comprising the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and Stirling:
|
Local Member |
Alternate (Deputy) Local Member |
|
Cr ……………………………………. |
Cr ……………………………………. |
|
Cr ……………………………………. |
Cr ……………………………………. |
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 390
File Ref: 1437 – 15/37466
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider adoption of the City of Wanneroo's (the City) Compliance Audit Return (CAR) for the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014.
Background
Each Local Government Agency is required to carry out an annual compliance audit against specific requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and relevant regulations that are set out in the CAR which must then be submitted to the Department of Local Government and Communities (the Department).
The Audit Committee reviewed the completed CAR (Attachment 1) at its meeting of 10 February 2015 and resolved:-
“That the Briefing Session:
1. ADVISES Council that it has undertaken a review of the 2014 Compliance Audit Return;
2. NOTES the completed 2014 Compliance Audit Return as shown in Attachment 1;
3. NOTES the comments contained within the Audit Report set out at Attachment 2; and
4. RECOMMENDS to Council the adoption of the Local Government Compliance Audit Return for the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014 as shown in Attachment 1.”
Detail
Compliance Audit Return
The Department's Circular No 35-2014, published on 23 December 2014 advised that the compliance audit return was available on the Department’s website for completion. The CAR was again published in a reduced format, with the areas of compliance restricted to those considered high risk.
Relevant sections of the CAR were circulated in January 2015 for completion by Managers with responses collated and provided to Enterprise Risk Management.
Internal Audit
An internal audit of the CAR was undertaken by Enterprise Risk Management during January 2015 which included limited risk-based sample testing of 35 questions from the CAR (Audit). The objective of the Audit was to consider the adequacy and effectiveness of key controls within the City to meet its compliance obligations and the Audit findings are set out in the Audit Report (Attachment 2).
The Audit Report sets out one exception in the section relating to "Disposal of Property”. Specifically the CAR question asks:
"Where the local government disposed of property under section 3.58(3), did it provide details, as prescribed by section 3.58(4), in the required local public notice for each disposal of property?"
Notwithstanding that the response provided was a "Yes", the findings of the Audit Report was that out of a sample of 5 tested, one property valuation was carried out more than 6 months before the proposed disposition, which was not declared by a resolution of the City which could indicate the valuation was still valid at the time of the proposed disposition. It was noted that, in the report to Council proposing property disposition, neither the relevant property valuation report was attached, nor the date of the property valuation was documented. Manager Property Services confirmed that this issue will be rectified by providing a report to Council in the coming months stating that the valuation is accurate in today's market.
Consultation
Managers were requested to complete those Audit questions relevant to their service unit with approval and sign-off by Directors prior to being amalgamated into the final Audit Report.
Enterprise Risk Management liaised with Governance and discussed the process followed to complete the CAR and documented CAR responses for each sampled CAR question. In addition, any management concerns were discussed and documented.
Comment
There was one area of non-compliance recorded in the CAR and as noted above, is reported in the Audit Report.
Statutory Compliance
The compliance programs of a local government are a strong indication of attitude towards meeting legislative requirements. Audit Committee practices in regard to monitoring compliance programs typically include monitoring compliance with legislation and regulations, reviewing the Annual Compliance Audit Return and reporting to Council the results of that review.
Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 refer:-
"14. Compliance audits by local governments
(1) A local government is to carry out a compliance audit for the period 1 January to 31 December each year.
(2) After carrying out a compliance audit the local government is to prepare a compliance audit return in a form approved by the Minister.
(3A) The local government's audit committee is to review the compliance audit return and is to report to the council the results of that review.
(3) After the audit committee has reported to the council under sub-regulation (3A), the compliance audit return is to be –
(a) presented to the council at a meeting of the council; and
(b) adopted by the council; and
(c) recorded in the minutes of the meeting at which it was adopted."
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.3 A Strong and Progressive Organisation - You will recognise the hard work and professionalism delivered by your council through your interactions and how our community is developing.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS the Local Government Compliance Audit Return for the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014 as shown in Attachment 1; and
2. NOTES that Administration is required to submit the completed Local Government Compliance Audit Return for the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014 to the Department of Local Government and Communities by 31 March 2015.
Attachments:
|
1. |
CAR Return 2014 |
15/27921 |
Minuted |
|
2. |
Compliance Audit Return 2014 - Internal Audit Report - Feb.2015 |
15/26053 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 419
3.27 Review of Wards and Representation - Outcome of Public Consultation and Recommendation to the Local Government Advisory Board
File Ref: 12256V02 – 15/38022
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the submissions received regarding the review of the ward boundaries and elected member representation and recommend to the Local Government Advisory Board (LGAB) Council’s preferred ward structure and elected member representation model.
Background
The Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) requires a local government with a ward system to undertake a review of:
a) its ward boundaries; and
b) the number of offices of councillor for each ward,
at least every eight years. The City’s last review was undertaken in 2006.
Schedule 2.2 of the Act provides for a district to be divided into wards and sets out the process to review wards and representation. In particular clause 8 of Schedule 2.2 requires a local government to assess options against the following factors:-
a) Community of interest;
b) Physical and topographical features;
c) Demographic trends;
d) Economic factors; and
e) The ratio of councillors to electors in the various wards.
After conducting its review, a local government recommends its proposal to the LGAB, which in turn makes recommendations to the Minister for Local Government. Proposals must take into account the above criteria, although the LGAB gives particular emphasis to the ratio of electors to councillors. On this basis, the LGAB's rule of thumb is that this ratio should not deviate by ward by more than 10% of the overall average number of electors per Councillor across the local government district.
As a result of its review, a local government may recommend any of the following proposals to the LGAB for consideration:-
a) creating new wards in a district already divided into wards;
b) changing the boundaries of a ward;
c) abolishing any or all of the wards into which a district is divided;
d) changing the name of a district or a ward;
e) changing the number of offices of councillor on a council; and/or
f) specifying or changing the number of offices of councillors for a ward.
At its meeting held on 11 November 2014 (see CS10-11/14), Council resolved to:
a) undertake a review of its ward system and representation (Review); and
b) adopted a discussion paper to facilitate consultation (Discussion Paper).
Detail
A critical and pertinent issue for Council to consider is that the City is expected to undergo significant growth over the period from now to 2021 (Period).
Taking into consideration:
a) a detailed analysis of projected elector numbers over the Period;
b) the criteria set in the Act to determine ward boundaries; and
c) the feedback received from public consultation,
provides that a system of 3 wards with 5 councillors in a North/Coastal Ward (North), 4 councillors in Central Ward, and 5 councillors in South Ward (retaining a total of 14) is the most appropriate for the City.
As noted above, in establishing wards the City must use the criteria set out in the Act. The following sets out how this criteria is applied to the City:-
Community of Interest
· Most of the City’s residents live in the southern half of the City.
· The City also includes the communities of Yanchep and Two Rocks and the ‘old’ town sites of Wanneroo and Quinns Rocks which are now effectively part of the greater suburban area of Perth but were distinct and separate town sites for many years.
· The City has rural areas in its northern and central areas such as Nowergup, Mariginiup and Carabooda.
· Lifestyle semi-rural communities are notable in the areas east of Wanneroo and include a focus on equine activities as well as market gardens.
Physical and topographical features
· The City's natural features include coastal zones, lakes and their surrounding catchments such as Gnangara, Jandabup, Mariginiup, Neerabup, Nowergup and Pinjar, with Lakes Joondalup and Goollelal forming part of the boundary with the City of Joondalup.
· Other features include the Gnangara Pine Plantation, the Yanchep National Park, and the Neerabup National Park.
· Man-made features include the northern passenger rail line and Mitchell Freeway (both built in reserved areas).
Demographic trends
· The population of the City is forecast for significant growth in the future.
· Urban development along the coastal areas, particularly in a northerly direction is expected to have a significant impact on population growth. In addition, increased urban densities in established suburbs such as Girrawheen and Koondoola in the south of the City will also serve to increase population growth.
Economic factors
· The southern areas of the City are predominantly residential.
· Light industrial areas are located in the Landsdale, Wangara, Neerabup, and Yanchep areas.
· Regional shopping centres include Kingsway, Wanneroo, and Clarkson. The Mindarie Marina is also an area of economic activity.
· Road networks tend to run north/south or east/west and include Wanneroo Road, Marmion Avenue, Hepburn Avenue, Ocean Reef Road, and others.
Ratio of Councillors to Electors
The ratio of Councillors to electors for the October 2013 Council Elections was above the 10% ratio for the North Ward (electors in the North Ward were over represented) and under the 10% ratio for Central Ward (electors in the Central Ward were under represented).
Consultation
Clause 7 of Schedule 2.2 of the Act requires that a local government is to give public notice of the review and advise that submissions may be made to the local government by a date at least 42 days from the date of the notice.
The City placed advertisements in local newspapers and on its website requesting comments about the Review, commencing on 25 November 2014 and closing on 27 January 2015. A Discussion Paper outlining the process and a few possible options was provided to assist with the consultation process.
The Discussion Paper set out four possible options to facilitate discussion which were as follows (Options):-
a) Option 1 – keep current wards (4) and boundaries, adjust the number of Councillors per ward;
b) Option 2 – keep current wards and number of Councillors per ward and adjust ward boundaries;
c) Option 3 – change to 3 wards and adjust ward boundaries;
d) Option 4 – remove all wards.
The Discussion Paper also provided for the public to make any other submissions and clearly set out that submissions were not limited to the four Options set out above.
Several media releases were also provided to local newspapers and a total of 5 were published. A public consultation forum was held on 21 January 2015 which was attended by four members of the public.
A total of four submissions were received and in summary, they tended to support Option 3. There was limited support for Options 1 and 2, and no support for Option 4 (‘no wards’).
One of the submissions also presented an alternative option, which was to divide the City into two wards with six councillors for North-Coastal and eight for South-Central, with a further alternative of six in each and two ‘located centrally’. A simple north/south split of the City would be relatively straightforward. Unfortunately while innovative, the Act does not provide for the election of some Councillors at large and some from wards. To some degree a Mayor elected from the entire district fills this role.
This submission also suggested changing a number of other matters such as use of the words ‘district’ rather than ‘wards and ‘representatives’ rather than ‘councillors’ amongst other things. These are matters outside the scope of the Review and would require legislative change as such terms are set out and defined in the Act.
A summary of the public submissions is Attachment 1.
Comment
As noted in the Discussion Paper the Options contained therein were intended to assist and facilitate discussion, not to indicate a definitive position or outcome for the City.
In particular the Options considered the following:-
a) a projection over an 8 year period, in order to assist in the establishment of a reasonably robust system of representation for as long as possible;
b) the expected population of the various localities of the district with as many known variables as possible, including any re-zonings;
c) locality (in particular suburbs) boundaries to make up wards;
d) the requirement to be as close as possible to the required tolerance of plus or minus 10% of the average number of electors per Councillor by 2021 within the Option parameters;
e) the number of projected electors from the proportion of the population who are electors (over 18 and enrolled to vote) by the current ward where the locality is located; and
f) retaining the maximum allowable number of Councillors in accordance with the Act.
Assessment of Options
Maps showing each Option assessed are included in the Discussion Paper attached to this report (Attachment 2). An analysis of the various Options, the additional option of two wards proposed by a member of the public and maintaining the current system are shown below.
Number of Councillors
It is recommended that the City retain 14 Councillors. There was no support to reduce the number of Councillors from the public consultation process and given the projected growth of the City, no logical reason to do so.
As such, the analysis of the effect of possible outcomes below directs to the retention of 14 Councillors.
Maintain the status quo
Under this option, current ward boundaries and the number of Councillors per ward are left ‘as is’ without any change.
Applying this to the criteria set out in the Act provides the following considerations:-
|
Factor |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Community of Interest |
This option maintains current communities of interest as they exist within the present wards of the City. |
Do current ward boundaries accurately reflect communities of interest for the period to 2021? |
|
Physical and Topographical Features |
The ward boundaries follow locality boundaries. In most cases these boundaries are major roads. |
Not all locality boundaries are major roads. |
|
Demographic Trends |
This option deals with expected growth by 2021. Wards where growth is expected are maintained. |
Over the Period urban growth moves from the coastal ward and into the north ward. |
|
Economic Factors |
The pattern of growth of the City over the Period is essentially residential. This option sees those areas of industrial and light industrial activity maintained within present wards. |
Nil. |
|
Ratio of Councillors to Electors (see below) |
Ratios are close to or within acceptable limits for 2015. |
This option presents significant deviations from an allowable variation of plus or minus 10% in 2017 and beyond. |
Future projected ratios of electors per Councillor for the period to 2021 for this option are:
|
|
2015 |
2017 |
|||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
2 |
14511 |
7255 |
-3.00% |
17972 |
8986 |
-18.00% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
27519 |
6880 |
2.33% |
29396 |
7349 |
3.50% |
|
Central |
3 |
23298 |
7766 |
-10.25% |
24456 |
8152 |
-7.04% |
|
South |
5 |
33287 |
6657 |
5.49% |
34793 |
6959 |
8.63% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
98615 |
7044 |
106617 |
7615 |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
2021 |
|||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
2 |
21716 |
10858 |
-32.72% |
25511 |
12755 |
-45.51% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
31030 |
7758 |
5.18% |
32737 |
8184 |
6.64% |
|
Central |
3 |
25624 |
8541 |
-4.40% |
26853 |
8951 |
-2.11% |
|
South |
5 |
36166 |
7233 |
11.59% |
37624 |
7525 |
14.16% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
114536 |
8181 |
122725 |
8766 |
||
While maintaining the status quo may be possible for the 2015 elections as the percentage ratio deviation of Councillors to electors is only marginally outside the limit allowed by the LGAB for the Central ward only, the City would be required to undertake another review prior to the elections scheduled for 2017 given the projected growth for the North ward over that time.
Therefore, maintaining the status quo is not recommended.
Option 1 – Keep current wards and boundaries, adjust Councillors between wards
Option 1 maintains the existing wards and their present boundaries, but adjusts the number of Councillors per ward – in the North ward Councillors are increased from 2 to 3; and South ward reduced from 5 to 4. Coastal and Central wards remain with 4 and 3 Councillors respectively.
In essence, Option 1 provides for expected growth in the City’s population to possibly correct imbalances in representation by 2021.
Applying this to the criteria set out in the Act provides the following considerations:-
|
Factor |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Community of Interest |
Option 1 maintains current communities of interest as they exist within the present wards of the City. |
Do current ward boundaries accurately reflect communities of interest for the period to 2021? |
|
Physical and Topographical Features |
The ward boundaries follow locality boundaries. In most cases these boundaries are major roads. |
Not all locality boundaries are major roads. |
|
Demographic Trends |
Option 1 deals with expected growth by 2021. Wards where growth is expected are maintained. |
Over the period in question urban growth moves from the coastal ward and into the North ward. |
|
Economic Factors |
The pattern of growth of the City over the Period is essentially residential. Option 1 sees those areas of industrial and light industrial activity maintained within present wards. |
Nil. |
|
Ratio of Councillors to Electors (see below) |
Ratios are within acceptable limits by 2021. |
Option 1 presents significant deviations from an allowable variation of plus or minus 10% in 2015 and 2017 |
Future projected ratios of electors per Councillor for the period to 2021 for Option 1 are:
|
2015 |
2017 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
3 |
14511 |
4837 |
31.33% |
3 |
17972 |
5991 |
21.33% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
27519 |
6880 |
2.33% |
4 |
29396 |
7349 |
3.50% |
|
Central |
3 |
23298 |
7766 |
-10.25% |
3 |
24456 |
8152 |
-7.04% |
|
South |
4 |
33287 |
8322 |
-18.14% |
4 |
34793 |
8698 |
-14.22% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
98615 |
7044 |
14 |
106617 |
7615 |
||
|
2019 |
2021 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
3 |
21716 |
7239 |
11.52% |
3 |
25511 |
8504 |
2.99% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
31030 |
7758 |
5.18% |
4 |
32737 |
8184 |
6.64% |
|
Central |
3 |
25624 |
8541 |
-4.40% |
3 |
26853 |
8951 |
-2.11% |
|
South |
4 |
36166 |
9041 |
-10.52% |
4 |
37624 |
9406 |
-7.30% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
114536 |
8181 |
14 |
122725 |
8766 |
||
While the ratio of electors per Councillor is within acceptable limits by 2021, there are significant deviations in the intervening period.
The City may consider reverting back to this system for the 2021 elections but would need to amend representation in the meantime.
Therefore Option 1 is not recommended.
Option 2 – Keep current wards and number of Councillors, adjust ward boundaries.
Option 2 maintains the existing wards and the number of Councillors per ward, but adjusts the ward boundaries and evens out any issues with equal representation. In summary, the localities of Eglinton and Alkimos are moved from the North ward to the Coastal ward.
Applying this to the criteria set out in the Act provides the following considerations:-
|
Factor |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Community of Interest |
Option 2 maintains most current communities of interest as they exist within the present wards of the City. |
Nil. |
|
Physical and Topographical Features |
The ward boundaries follow locality boundaries. In most cases these boundaries are major roads. |
Not all locality boundaries are major roads. |
|
Demographic Trends |
Option 2 deals with expected growth by 2021. Wards where growth is expected are grouped together. |
Nil. |
|
Economic Factors |
The pattern of growth of the City over the Period is essentially residential. Option 2 sees those areas of industrial and light industrial activity maintained within present wards. |
Nil. |
|
Ratio of councillors to electors (see below) |
Ratios are within acceptable limits for all wards in 2017 only. |
Option 2 presents significant deviations from an allowable variation of plus or minus 10% in 2015, 2019 and 2021 |
Future projected ratios of electors per Councillor for the period to 2021 for Option 2 are:
|
2015 |
2017 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
2 |
12117 |
6058 |
13.99% |
2 |
13894 |
6947 |
8.78% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
29913 |
7478 |
-6.17% |
4 |
33475 |
8369 |
-9.89% |
|
Central |
3 |
23298 |
7766 |
-10.25% |
3 |
24456 |
8152 |
-7.04% |
|
South |
5 |
33287 |
6657 |
5.49% |
5 |
34793 |
6959 |
8.63% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
98615 |
7044 |
14 |
106617 |
7615 |
||
|
2019 |
2021 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
North |
2 |
15784 |
7892 |
3.54% |
2 |
17711 |
8855 |
-1.02% |
|
Coastal |
4 |
36962 |
9241 |
-12.95% |
4 |
40537 |
10134 |
-15.61% |
|
Central |
3 |
25624 |
8541 |
-4.40% |
3 |
26853 |
8951 |
-2.11% |
|
South |
5 |
36166 |
7233 |
11.59% |
5 |
37624 |
7525 |
14.16% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
114536 |
8181 |
14 |
122725 |
8766 |
||
The ratio of electors per Councillor is only within the acceptable plus or minus 10% variance in 2017 for all wards.
Therefore Option 2 is not recommended.
Option 3 – Adjust Councillors, wards and ward boundaries
Option 3 sees a reduction in the number of wards from four to three, maintains the existing number of Councillors across the City at 14, and adjusts ward boundaries to even out representation.
The number of councillors per ward is made as even as possible, with five in the proposed Ward A (the former Coastal and the northern half of the former North ward), four in Ward B (most of the former Central ward and the southern part of the former North ward) and five in Ward C (most of the former South ward, with the localities of Wangara and Gnangara transferred to it).
Applying this to the criteria set out in the Act provides the following considerations:-
|
Factor |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Community of Interest |
Coastal communities are within the same ward. Rural areas are almost all in one ward area. |
The parts of the City that are rural in nature are split over two wards although only Gnangara is affected. |
|
Physical and Topographical Features |
The ward boundaries follow locality boundaries. In most cases these boundaries are major roads. |
The boundary between the locality of Gnangara (proposed to be in the southern ward) and Wanneroo/Jandabup is not well defined. |
|
Demographic Trends |
The proposed structure provides a robust system of representation for an extended period of forecast growth across the City. |
Nil. |
|
Economic Factors |
Areas of commercial activity such as Wangara and Landsdale are in one ward |
Nil. |
|
Ratio of Councillors to Electors (see below) |
The proposed structure and numbers of Councillors per ward provide for ratios within tolerances across the entire period to 2021 |
The ratio for one ward is slightly above tolerance by 2021. |
Future projected ratios of electors per Councillor for the period to 2021 for Option 3 are:
|
2015 |
2017 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
A |
5 |
34405 |
6881 |
2.31% |
5 |
38816 |
7763 |
-1.94% |
|
B |
4 |
29914 |
7478 |
-6.17% |
4 |
31850 |
7962 |
-4.56% |
|
C |
5 |
34296 |
6859 |
2.62% |
5 |
35951 |
7190 |
5.58% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
98615 |
7044 |
14 |
106617 |
7615 |
||
|
2019 |
2021 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Electors per Councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
A |
5 |
43445 |
8689 |
-6.21% |
5 |
48176 |
9635 |
-9.91% |
|
B |
4 |
33676 |
8419 |
-2.91% |
4 |
35583 |
8896 |
-1.48% |
|
C |
5 |
37415 |
7483 |
8.53% |
5 |
38966 |
7793 |
11.10% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
114536 |
8181 |
14 |
122725 |
8766 |
||
Option 3 provides for acceptable plus or minus 10% variances across all wards and all years projected, except for one ward in 2021 but only slightly. Given that this is some time away, and that future elector numbers will need to be monitored over the intervening Period, this is considered reasonable.
Option 3 meets all of the criteria required, maintains a wards system and deals with the City’s projected growth without the need for additional reviews in between the minimum period of 8 years required by legislation.
Option 3 also attracted the most support from the public consultation process, notwithstanding that only a small number of submissions were received.
Therefore Option 3 is recommended.
Option 4 – No wards
Option 4 dispenses with all the wards. As there are no wards under Option 4, the ability to provide some measure of differentiation to deal with different characteristics is lost.
Some advantages and disadvantages of dispensing with wards altogether are:
|
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
· Elected members are elected by the whole community not just a section of it. Knowledge and interest in all areas of the Council’s affairs would result in broadening the views beyond the immediate concerns of those in a ward. · The smaller town sites and rural areas have the whole Council working for them. · Members of the community who want to approach an elected member can speak to any elected member. · Social networks and communities of interest are often spread across a local government and elected members can have an overview of these. · Elected members can use their specialty skills and knowledge for the benefit of the whole local government. · There is balanced representation with each elected member representing the whole community. · The election process is much simpler for the community to understand and for the Council to administer.
|
· Electors may feel that they are not adequately represented if they do not have an affinity with any of the elected members. · Elected members living in a certain area may have a greater affinity and understanding of the issues specific to that area. · It may be more difficult and costly for candidates to be elected if they need to canvass the whole local government area.
|
There was no support for Option 4 from the public consultation process. By default Option 4 meets all criteria as none would apply.
Therefore Option 4 is not recommended.
Two wards
A submission was received from a member of the public who suggested that the City consider two wards. A map showing this proposal is not attached, but would be a simple division of the City with (say) the current North and Coastal wards combined, and the current Central and South Wards combined. There could be 6 councillors for the North/Coastal ward, and 8 for the Central/South.
Applying this to the criteria set out in the Act provides the following considerations:-
|
Factor |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Community of Interest |
This option combines those current communities of interest as they exist within the present North/Coastal and Central/South wards of the City. |
Do current ward boundaries accurately reflect communities of interest for the period to 2021? |
|
Physical and Topographical Features |
The ward boundaries follow locality boundaries. In most cases these boundaries are major roads. |
Not all locality boundaries are major roads. |
|
Demographic Trends |
This option deals with expected growth by 2021. Wards where growth is expected are maintained. |
Over the Period urban growth moves from the coastal ward and into the north ward. |
|
Economic Factors |
The pattern of growth of the City over the Period is essentially residential. This option sees those areas of industrial and light industrial activity maintained within present wards. |
Nil. |
|
Ratio of Councillors to Electors (see below) |
Ratios are within acceptable limits by 2021. |
One ward is slightly over the acceptable ratio by 2021. |
Future projected ratios of electors per Councillor for the period to 2021 for this option are:
|
2015 |
2017 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
A |
6 |
42030 |
7005 |
0.55% |
6 |
47368 |
7895 |
-3.67% |
|
B |
8 |
56586 |
7073 |
-0.42% |
8 |
59248 |
7406 |
2.75% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
98615 |
7044 |
14 |
106617 |
7615 |
||
|
2019 |
2021 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
Councillors |
Estimated electors |
Ratio of electors per councillor |
% ratio Deviation |
|
A |
6 |
52746 |
8791 |
-7.45% |
6 |
58248 |
9708 |
-10.74% |
|
B |
8 |
61790 |
7724 |
5.59% |
8 |
64477 |
8060 |
8.06% |
|
Totals/ average |
14 |
114536 |
8181 |
14 |
122725 |
8766 |
||
This option is within acceptable tolerances for all wards and all years projected, except for one ward in 2021 but only slightly. Given that this is some time away, and that future elector numbers will need to be monitored anyway, this is considered reasonable.
This option meets all of the criteria required, maintains a wards system, deals with the City’s projected growth without the need for additional reviews in between the minimum period of 8 years required by legislation.
Therefore Council should consider this option as a viable option.
Transitional arrangements
Note that if ward boundaries change (or if the City opts for a ‘no wards’ outcome) it is possible that existing Councillors whose terms of office go beyond October 2015 can also be allocated to represent those new wards or adjusted boundaries.
Those Councillors whose terms expire at the ordinary Council elections scheduled for October 2015 will simply expire in the normal course of events. The remainder though are eligible to continue until 2017, when their terms would also expire.
This does depend on how any proposed new arrangement fits the requirements of the Act in terms of its overall requirements, such as requiring half of the number of councillors retiring at each election, and half from each ward.
The LGAB advises that “if a local government does not wish to declare all offices of Councillors vacant, then this must be communicated in a submission to the Board. The Local Government can recommend the allocation of councillors who still have two years in office to the new wards.”
Councillors also have a choice as to whether to represent any ‘new’ ward, and do not have to live in a ward to represent it, however advice from the Department of Local Government stated (amongst other things) that “existing Councillors will be allocated to wards where at least some of the electors elected them. That is, there will be some geographical overlap between the old and new ward.”
It is therefore recommended that if Option 3 is adopted, existing Councillors in the Coastal Ward whose terms do not expire in 2015 be allocated to the North Coastal or North Ward. The Councillors currently representing the Central and South Wards whose terms do not expire at the 2015 elections remain unchanged.
Ward Names
Finally, names of any new wards should be selected. If Option 3 is selected then names could simply be:
· Ward A – North Coastal or simply North.
· Ward B – Central
· Ward C – South
Statutory Compliance
The process for reviewing wards and representation is set out in Section 2.2 and Schedule 2.2 of the Act. The relevant provisions are detailed above.
The City has complied with the requirements of the Act in undertaking the review.
In implementing any change however, consideration must be given to clauses 1 and 2 of Schedule 4.2 of the Act, which provides that as near as practical that half of the total number of Councillors are to retire every two years and as near as practical that half of the Councillors representing each ward are to retire every two years. The exact effect will not be known until a preferred outcome is selected, but Council will need to ensure its final resolution to request any change complies with the requirements of the Act.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023: “4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.1 Listening and Leading - Our community actively participates in forums and events to discuss and inform the local decision-making.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:-
1. RECOMMENDS to the Local Government Advisory Board (LGBA) as per Clause 9 of Schedule 2.2 of the Local Government Act 1995, the making of an order under sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.18 of the Local Government Act 1995 to change the wards and representation of the City of Wanneroo as follows:
a) Establish a North Ward with 5 councillors;
b) Establish a Central Ward with 4 councillors;
c) Establish a South Ward with 5 councillors; and
d) With Ward boundaries as shown on the map included in Attachment 2 to the report labelled ‘Option 3 – Adjust councillors, wards and ward boundaries’.
2. REQUESTS the LGAB that these changes be implemented for the 2015 Local Government elections, and that Councillors whose terms expire in 2017 be allocated to the proposed new Wards as follows:-
· Existing Councillors in the Coastal Ward whose terms do not expire in 2015 be allocated to the North Coastal or North Ward and Councillors currently representing the Central and South Wards whose terms do not expire at the 2015 elections remain unchanged.
|
1. |
Summary of Submissions |
15/32830 |
|
|
2. |
Discussion Paper |
15/35228 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 457
File Ref: 2855V02 – 15/38066
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received five sponsorship requests, nil community donation requests and nil requests for a waiver of fees and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Governance upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Touch Football Australia |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Tyla Love, Calozz and Jurnee Paterson |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
Touch Football Australia – 2015 National Touch League, Coffs Harbour NSW, 11-14 March 2015 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (National) |
|
Comments
|
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Touch Football Australia for the participation of Tyla Love and Calozz and Jurnee Paterson to attend the Touch Football Australia – 2015 National Touch League to be held in Coffs Harbour NSW from 11 – 14 March 2015. |
|
Reason |
This request complies with Council's Policy. |
|
Applicant 2 – Keady Upton School of Irish Dancing |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Dara and Caoimhe McAleer |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2015 World Irish Dancing Championships, Montreal, Canada, 29 March to 5 April 2015 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
$500 each (international) |
|
Comments |
As per the policy $500 per individual (capped at $1500 per team) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $1,000.00 to the Keady Upton School of Irish Dancing for the participation of Dara and Caoimhe McAleer to attend the 2015 World Irish Dancing Championships to be held in Montreal, Canada from 29 March to 5 April 2015. |
|
Reason |
This request complies with Council's Policy. |
|
Applicant 3 – Track Cycling Western Australia |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Laura Hodges and Kye and Karis Bonser |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
National Junior U15/U17 Track Championships, Melbourne Vic 25 – 28 February 2015 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (national) |
|
Comments |
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Track Cycling Western Australia for the participation of Laura Hodges and Kye and Karis Bonser to attend the National Junior U15/U17 Track Championships to be held in Melbourne, Vic from 25 – 28 February 2015. |
|
Reason |
This request complies with Council's Policy. |
|
Applicant 4 – Tenpin Bowling Association Western Australia (TBAWA) |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Bethany Cavanagh, Brendon Evans, Eammon Coutts, Callum Borck and Chelsea and Ashleigh Blunden |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2015 Junior President’s Shield, Lidcombe NSW 9 – 19 April 2015 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (national) |
|
Comments |
As per the policy $200 per individual (capped at $600 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Tenpin Bowling Association Western Australia for the participation of Bethany Cavanagh, Brendon Evans, Eammon Coutts, Callum Borck and Chelsea and Ashleigh Blunden to attend the 2015 Junior President’s Shield to be held in Lidcombe NSW from 9 – 19 April 2015. |
|
Reason |
This request complies with Council's Policy. |
|
Applicant 5 – Ashdale Secondary College |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Shannon Andrews, Shannon Bellamore, Ella Bennett, Sophie Cooper, Isabella Drew, Chloe Glasson, Tenesha Harvey, Rebecca Lemmon, Aimee Liddicoat, Aimee Littlejohn, Shannane Pol, Laquala Tuhua, Hannah Waddell and Jade Woodhouse |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2015 Gold Coast Netball Carnival, Southport Qld, 4 -7 July 2015 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
$200 each (national) |
|
Comments |
As per the policy $200.00 per individual, capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year. |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $2,000.00 to Ashdale Secondary College for the participation of Shannon Andrews, Shannon Bellamore, Ella Bennett, Sophie Cooper, Isabella Drew, Chloe Glasson, Tenesha Harvey, Rebecca Lemmon, Aimee Liddicoat, Aimee Littlejohn, Shannane Pol, Laquala Tuhua, Hannah Waddell and Jade Woodhouse to attend the 2015 Gold Coast Netball Carnival to be held in Southport Qld from 4 – 7 July 2015. |
|
Reason |
This request complies with Council's Policy. |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“2 Society - Healthy, safe, vibrant and active communities.
2.2 Healthy and Active People - We get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
The City of Wanneroo Donations, Sponsorship and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four teams) and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2014/2015 |
|
$80 000.00 |
|
Amount expended to date (as at 12 February) |
|
$59,075.91 |
|
Balance |
|
$20,924.09 |
|
Total of requests for this round: Donations (in this report):
Total this Round (recommended) |
$4,800.00 |
$4,800.00 |
|
BALANCE |
|
$16,124.09 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES the following requests for sponsorship in the sum of:
1. $600.00 to Touch Football Australia for the participation of Tyla Love and Calozz and Jurnee Paterson to attend the Touch Football Australia – 2015 National Touch League to be held in Coffs Harbour NSW from 11 – 14 March 2015;
2. $1,000.00 to the Keady Upton School of Irish Dancing for the participation of Dara and Caoimhe McAleer to attend the 2015 World Irish Dancing Championships to be held in Montreal, Canada from 29 March to 5 April 2015;
3. $600.00 to Track Cycling Western Australia for the participation of Laura Hodges and Kye and Karis Bonser to attend the National Junior U15/U17 Track Championships to be held in Melbourne, Vic from 25 – 28 February 2015;
4. $600.00 to Tenpin Bowling Association Western Australia for the participation of Bethany Cavanagh, Brendon Evans, Eammon Coutts, Callum Borck and Chelsea and Ashleigh Blunden to attend the 2015 Junior President’s Shield to be held in Lidcombe NSW from 9 – 19 April 2015; and
5. $2,000.00 to Ashdale Secondary College for the participation of Shannon Andrews, Shannon Bellamore, Ella Bennett, Sophie Cooper, Isabella Drew, Chloe Glasson, Tenesha Harvey, Rebecca Lemmon, Aimee Liddicoat, Aimee Littlejohn, Shannane Pol, Laquala Tuhua, Hannah Waddell and Jade Woodhouse to attend the 2015 Gold Coast Netball Carnival to be held in Southport Qld from 4 – 7 July 2015.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 462
Chief Executive Office
File Ref: 8179 – 15/42897
Author: Cr Dianne Guise
Action Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Previous Items: CB02-10/14 - Report / Minutes Cancellation of Part of Reserve 33522 (Lot 9062 Neville Drive, Wanneroo)
Issue
This Motion on Notice seeks Council reconsideration of a proposal to cancel 215m2 (approximate, subject to survey) of Reserve 33522.
Background
Administration investigated a proposal for adjoining landowners (Andrew John Ayling and Sheila Ayling) ("Ayling") to acquire a small portion of Reserve 33522 (Scenic Park). The land in question has an area of 215m2 (approximate, subject to survey), and is wholly comprised within a discrete parcel of Crown land at Lot 9062 Neville Drive, Wanneroo (more particularly described as Lot 9062 on Deposited Plan 180865 and being the whole of the land comprised in Qualified Certificate of Crown Land Title Volume LR3047 Folio 113) ("Lot 9062").
Administration reported to Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 14 October 2014 (Item CB02-10/14). Following consideration of Administration's recommendation, Council unanimously passed an alternative motion:
"That Council NOT PROGRESS with the cancelling of the Management Order applicable to Reserve 33522."
Detail
Following the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 14 October 2014, Mr Ayling supplied information to Council that:
· The existing encroachment from his property at 19AThompson Drive, Wanneroo into Lot 9062 was inadvertent.
· The proposed acquisition of Lot 9062 would not involve any building across property boundaries or amalgamation with his other adjoining property.
· The intended use of the land would not change the status quo and would not disrupt or diminish the amenity for adjoining landowners.
Consultation
Discussion was held with Mr Ayling during the past 2 months. Administration had previously engaged in consultation with other landowners and the local community.
Comment
On the basis that Mr Ayling has provided clarification regarding the encroachment into Lot 9062 and his intended use of Lot 9062, the proposed cancellation of Reserve 33522 as it applies to Lot 9062 and disposal of Lot 9062 is submitted for further consideration by Council.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2013 – 2023:
“4 Civic Leadership - Working with others to ensure the best use of our resources.
4.2 Working With Others - The community is a desirable place to live and work as the City works with others to deliver the most appropriate outcomes.”
Risk Management Considerations
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. REQUESTS that the Minister for Lands:
a) cancels the Management Order applicable to Reserve 33522 in so far as it applies to Lot 9062 on Deposited Plan 180865 (being the whole of the land comprised in Qualified Certificate of Crown Land Title Volume LR3047 Folio 113) ("Lot 9062"); and
b) cancels the portion of Reserve 33522 as is wholly comprised in Lot 9062;
2. DELEGATES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to execute such documents as are required by the Minister for Lands from the City of Wanneroo to effect that revocation of the Management Order applicable to Reserve 33522 and cancellation of the portion of Reserve 33522 in so far as the same apply to Lot 9062 and is resolved by (1);
3. CONSENTS to the disposal of Lot 9062 by the Minister for Lands to Andrew John Ayling and Sheila Ayling; and
4. NOTES that in the event that a sale of Lot 9062 by the Minister for Lands to Andrew John Ayling and Sheila Ayling does not proceed, the City shall agree to assume management of Lot 9062 provided that Lot 9062 is amalgamated with the adjacent parcel of Reserve 33522.
Administration Comment
Administration supported the disposal of Lot 9062 by a recommended resolution in the same terms as the resolution proposed by this Motion on Notice. Administration supports this Motion on Notice and its proposed resolution.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Elected Members' Briefing Session 24 February, 2015 465
Item 5 Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
Cr Dot Newton: Motion on Notice - Dog Signage to keep dogs on leads at Parks.
Cr Parker and Cr Treby: Mortion on Notice to be finalised.
Nil
The Ordinary Council Meeting has been scheduled for 7.00pm on 3 March 2015 to be held at the Civic Centre, Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
