Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
7:00pm, 10 February 2020
Council Chambers (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
7:00pm, 10 February 2020
Council Chambers (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
PUBLIC QUESTION & STATEMENT TIME
1. Time Permitted
A minimum of 15 minutes is permitted for Public Question Time at Council Meetings. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the Presiding Member will move to the next item. If there are more questions to be considered within 15 minutes, the Presiding Member will determine whether to extend Public Question Time. Each person seeking to ask questions during Public Question Time may address the Council for a maximum of three minutes each.
2. Protocols
No member of the public may interrupt the Council Meeting proceedings or enter into conversation.
Members of the public wishing to participate in Public Question Time at the Council Meeting are to register on the night at the main reception desk located outside of Council Chambers. Members of the public wishing to submit written questions are requested to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting (that is, by 12noon on the day before the meeting).
The Presiding Member will control Public Question Time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. Members of the public wishing to ask a question must state his or her name and address before asking a question. If the question relates to an item on the Agenda, the item number and title should be stated.
3. General Rules
The following general rules apply to Public Question and Statement Time:
· Public Questions and Statements should only relate to the business of the local government and should not be a personal statement or opinion;
· Only questions relating to matters affecting the local government will be considered at a Council Meeting, and only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered at a Special Council Meeting;
· Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting;
· Questions may not be directed at specific Elected Members or City Employee;
· Questions are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Elected Member or City Employee;
· First priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current Council Meeting Agenda; and
· Second priority will be given to Public Statements. Only Public Statements regarding items on the Council Agenda under consideration will be heard.
DEPUTATIONS
An informal session will be held on the same day as the Council meeting at the Civic Centre, Wanneroo, commencing at 6.00pm. Members of the public may, by appointment, present Deputations relating to items on the current Council Agenda. A request for a Deputation must be received by Council Support by 12 noon on the Friday before the Council Meeting.
· Deputation requests must relate to items on the current Council Meeting Agenda;
· A Deputation is not to exceed three persons in number and only those persons may address the meeting; and
· Members of a deputation are collectively to have a maximum of 10 minutes to address the meeting, unless an extension of time is granted by the Council.
Please ensure mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber.
For further information please contact Council Support on 9405 5027.
RECORDING AND ACCESS TO RECORDINGS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS POLICY
Objective
· To ensure there is a process in place to outline the access to recorded Council Meetings.
· To emphasise that the reason for recording of Council Meetings is to ensure the accuracy of Council Meeting Minutes and that any reproduction of these Minutes are for the sole purpose of Council business.
Implications
City of Wanneroo Strategic Community Plan 2017/2018 to 2026/2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Recordings pertaining to the proceedings of Council Meetings shall be retained in accordance with the State Records Act 2000.
Implementation
This Policy shall be printed within the Agenda of all Council Meetings which include:
· Ordinary Council Meeting;
· Special Council Meeting;
· Annual General Meeting of Electors; and
· Special Electors Meeting.
To advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.
Evaluation and Review Provisions
Recording of Proceedings
1. Proceedings for Council Meetings; as well as Deputations and Public Question Time during these meetings shall be recorded by the City on sound recording equipment, except in the case of a meeting where Council closes the meeting to the public.
2. Notwithstanding subclause 1, proceedings of a Council Meeting, which is closed to the public, shall be recorded where the Council resolves to do so.
3. No member of the public is to use any audio visual technology or devices to record the proceedings of a Council or Committee Meeting, without the written permission of the Mayor or the Mayors Delegate.
Access to Recordings
4. Members of the public may purchase a copy of the recorded proceedings or alternatively, listen to the recorded proceedings at the Civic Centre. Costs of providing a copy of the recorded proceedings to members of the public will include staff time to make the copy of the proceedings; as well as the cost of the digital copy for the recording to be placed on. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges each financial year.
5. Elected Members may request a copy of the recording of the Council proceedings at no charge.
6. All Elected Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by members of the public, and of Council.
7. Transcripts can be produced on the request of the Chief Executive Officer and will include staff time set by the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges.
COMMONLY USED aCRONYMS AND THEIR mEANING
|
Acronym |
Meaning |
|
|
|
|
ABN |
Australian Business Number |
|
|
|
|
ACN |
Australian Company Number |
|
|
|
|
Act |
Local Government Act 1995 |
|
|
|
|
CBP |
City of Wanneroo Corporate Business Plan |
|
|
|
|
CHRMAP |
Coastal Hazard Risk Management & Adaption Plan |
|
|
|
|
City |
City of Wanneroo |
|
|
|
|
CPI |
Consumer Price Index |
|
|
|
|
DBCA |
Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions |
|
|
|
|
DFES |
Department of Fire and Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
DOE |
Department of Education Western Australia |
|
|
|
|
DOH |
Department of Health |
|
|
|
|
DPLH |
Department of Planning Lands and Heritage |
|
|
|
|
DPS2 |
District Planning Scheme No. 2 |
|
|
|
|
DLGSCI |
Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries |
|
|
|
|
DWER |
Department of Water and Environmental Regulation |
|
|
|
|
EPA |
Environmental Protection Authority |
|
|
|
|
GST |
Goods and Services Tax |
|
|
|
|
JDAP |
Joint Development Assessment Panel |
|
|
|
|
LTFP |
Long Term Financial Plan |
|
|
|
|
MRS |
Metropolitan Region Scheme |
|
|
|
|
MRWA |
Main Roads Western Australia |
|
|
|
|
POS |
Public Open Space |
|
|
|
|
PTA |
Public Transport Authority of Western Australia |
|
|
|
|
SAT |
State Administrative Tribunal |
|
|
|
|
SCP |
City of Wanneroo Strategic Community Plan |
|
|
|
|
WALGA |
Western Australian Local Government Association |
|
|
|
|
WAPC |
Western Australian Planning Commission |
Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held at the
Council Chambers (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Monday 10 February, 2020 commencing at 7:00pm.
D Simms
Chief Executive Officer
6 February, 2020
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 3_____ Public Question Time
Item 4_____ Confirmation of Minutes
OC01-02/20 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 December 2019
Item 5_____ Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6_____ Questions from Elected Members
UP02-02/20 The provision of canteen facilities at the Kingsway Little Athletics Centre (PT02-12/19)
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
PS01-02/20 Appointment of Community Members to the Environmental Advisory Committee
PS02-02/20 Proposed Amendments to WALGA Preferred Model - Third Party Appeal Rights in Planning
PS05-02/20 Review of Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation
PS09-02/20 Consideration of Amendment No. 2 to Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84
PS12-02/20 Draft Amended Local Planning Policy 4.7 - Uniform Fencing
PS13-02/20 Draft Amended Local Planning Policy 4.5 - Subdivisional Retaining Walls
AS01-02/20 Tender No 19275 - Hartman Drive Duplication between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road
CP01-02/20 North Coast Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study
CP02-02/20 PT02-12/19 Request for canteen facilities at the Kingsway Little Athletics Centre
CP03-02/20 Yanchep Lagoon - Proposal for Additional Parking
CP04-02/20 Future Direction of Girrawheen Hub
Corporate Strategy & Performance
CS01-02/20 2019/2020 Mid Year Review - Annual Planning and Budget
CS02-02/20 Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 30 November 2019
CS03-02/20 Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 December 2019
CS04-02/20 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 December 2019
CS05-02/20 Proposed Lease - Hennaberrys for Hair - Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre
CS06-02/20 Consideration of Motions Received at the Annual General Meeting of Electors'
CS07-02/20 Donations to be Considered by Council - February 2020
CE01-02/20 Attendance at Events Policy (Council Members and CEO)
MN01-02/20 Cr Brett Treby – Azelia Street - Traffic Issues
CR01-02/20 Proposed Sale of Lot 9001 (54) Mullingar Way, Landsdale
CR02-02/20 Commingled Recyclables Processing
Item 12____ Date of Next Meeting
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 4
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region and I invite you to bow your head in prayer:
Lord, We ask for your blessing upon our City, our community and our Council. Guide us in our decision making to act fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity and honesty. May we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide the City of Wanneroo to a prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 December 2019 be confirmed.
Item 5 Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion
Item 6 Questions from Elected Members
|
Cr Treby presented a petition of 10 signatories requesting the City to permanently close the Public Access Way between Nankivell Way and Mirrabooka Avenue Koondoola.
Update:
Report will be presented at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 7 April 2020 for consideration. |
|
Cr Zappa presented a petition of 105 signatories requesting the City of Wanneroo to provide canteen facilities at the Kingsway Little Athletics Centre.
Update:
A report on this matter is presented to this Council meeting at item CP02-02/20. |
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
File Ref: 1441V02 – 19/480915
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To appoint community representatives to the Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC).
Background
In accordance with Section 5.11 of the Act, all Committee memberships cease on the day of an ordinary election. It is therefore now necessary to consider nominations for appointment of the vacant community representative positions. The new term of appointment will be for a term of two years, expiring at the next ordinary election day.
The main role of the EAC is to provide a forum for community participation in the preparation of the City’s environmental policies, strategies and other such matters referred to it by the City. The focus of this participation is to provide comments reflecting broad community interests, values and aspirations for good environmental outcomes that benefit the community overall. These comments are then taken into account by the City, and Council.
The EAC’s Terms of Reference provide for a maximum of seven members, comprised of three Council Members and a maximum of four community representatives.
At the 29 October 2019 Special Council Meeting, Council appointed Cr Sangalli, Cr Aitken and Cr Huntley as Council Member delegates to the EAC.
Detail
The City advertised on 18 October 2019 calling for nominations from new community representatives to sit on the EAC, closing on 20 December 2019. A total of ten nominations were received for the four positions available. A summary of the nominations is provided in Confidential Attachment 1.
Consultation
A call for nominations was advertised from 18 October 2019 to 20 December 2019 via the Wanneroo Times.
Comment
A total of ten nominations were received for community representatives on the EAC. As the EAC Terms of Reference only allow a maximum of four community representatives from the City of Wanneroo, not all of the nominations received by the City can be supported.
Confidential Attachment 1 above provides a summary of all of the nominations received and sets out relevant qualifications and experience for each nomination received.
Administration has reviewed each nomination and recommends that the following nominees be appointed to represent the community on the EAC:
· Craig Butt;
· Vicki Joyce;
· Rob Phillips; and
· Chris White.
Administration’s recommendation is based on the relevant experience and qualifications of each of their nominations, and Administration is of the view that they would bring valuable experience and knowledge to the EAC.
The nominees recommended by Administration provide a cross section of skills and expertise as well as a sound knowledge base of key environmental issues affecting the City. Selections also ensure that members are available for Committee meetings and that there is diversity across the Committee in regards to the knowledge of key issues affecting the City’s natural and built environments.
The recommended nominations adequately fulfil the requirements of the EAC and present the broad spectrum of knowledge, experience and backgrounds required for the Committee.
Administration acknowledges and appreciates the nominations received by Mr Michael Kelly, Mrs Joan Day, Mr Christopher Webb, Mrs Anita Marriott, Mr Tim Pugh, and Mr Stephen Knight.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Part 5 – Administration, Division 2 – Council Meetings, committees and their meetings and electors meetings, Subdivision 2 – Committees and their meetings of the Local Government Act 1995, members to Council committees should be appointed by the local government through an absolute majority:
“5.10 Appointment of committee members
(1) A committee is to have as its members –
(a) persons appointed* by the local government to be members of the committee.
*Absolute majority required.”
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.2 Engage, include and involve community”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, APPOINTS to the Environmental Advisory Committee Mr Craig Butt, Ms Vicki Joyce, Mr Rob Phillips and Mr Chris White as community representatives; and
2. ACKNOWLEDGES and THANKS the community for the nominations received and contributions made to the Environmental Advisory Committee.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Summary of Nominee Experience and Qualifications |
Confidential |
Minuted |
Attachment 1 - Summary of Nominee Experience and Qualifications
Appointment of Community Members to the Environmental Advisory Committee
This attachment is confidential and distributed under a separate cover to all Elected Members.
Administration Use Only:
Attachment 1 – HPE# 20/23479
Approval Services
File Ref: 30042 – 19/456214
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
For Council to provide comment to the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) on a possible amendment to its preferred model for Third Party Appeal Rights.
Background
In May 2017, WALGA released a Third Party Appeals Rights discussion paper which outlined its policy position at the time, as well as presenting arguments for and against the introduction of third party appeal rights for town planning decisions. A report was submitted to the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 August 2017 (PS04-08/17) where Council resolved as follows:
That Council:-
1. ADVISES WALGA that it does not support a comprehensive introduction of Third Party Appeals into the Western Australian planning framework, however, considers that there would be some merit in the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights in limited circumstances where determinations have been issued by the Development Assessment Panels (DAPS); and
2. NOTES that public confidence in the DAPs decision making process is likely to be enhanced by introducing Third Party Appeal Rights in limited circumstances, particularly when transparency and accountability is clearly demonstrated in the determination process.
In December 2018, WALGA released an expanded preferred model on third party appeal rights. This expanded preferred model was presented to the 5 February 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting (PS07-02/19). Council at that meeting reaffirmed its 22 August 2017 resolution, and resolved to clarify the meaning of the term ‘limited circumstances’ from that resolution as follows:
‘Limited circumstances’ in the context of the previous resolution relates to extending Third Party Appeal Rights to a responsible authority for applications determined by the Development Assessment Panel in a manner inconsistent with a recommendation prepared by those parties.
The current “Preferred Model: Third Party Appeals Rights for Decision made by Development Assessment Panels” (Preferred Model) was later endorsed by WALGA at its 8 May 2019 State Council Meeting. The relevant resolution made at that WALGA State Council Meeting is as follows:
1. Continues to advocate for the State Government to introduce Third Party Appeal Rights for decisions made by Development Assessment Panels; and
2. Endorses the ‘Preferred Model’ as presented in the May 2019 Agenda, as the third party appeals process for decisions made by Development Assessment Panels and in future give consideration to broadening Third Party Appeal Rights to other parties relating to Development Assessment Panel decisions.
The current WALGA Preferred Model is included as Attachment 1. WALGA has now invited comment on the proposed amendments to the Preferred Model, as discussed in this Report.
As set out in the Development Assessment Panel Practice Notes issued by the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage, only applicants are usually permitted to apply to the SAT for merit review of applications. Third party appeal rights do not generally exist for planning decisions. The State Government currently does not support third party appeal rights for planning decisions.
Detail
WALGA members discussed proposed amendments to the Preferred Model at its 7 August 2019 WALGA Annual General Meeting. At the meeting, the attendees carried the following Motion:
1. That there be an amendment to the Third Party Appeals Process Preferred Model, being that third parties in addition to Local Governments are able to make an appeal.
2. That there be an amendment to the Third Party Appeals Process Preferred Model, being that closely associated third parties in addition to Local Governments are able to appeal decisions made by the Western Australian Planning Commission and the State Administrative Tribunal, in addition to Development Assessment Panels.
The above Motion proposes:
· That a third party appeal against a planning decision could be lodged by a local government, as well as ‘closely related third parties’. The Motion does not define who would constitute a closely related third party;
· That a local government or closely related third party could appeal a planning decision made by a Development Assessment Panel (DAP), the SAT or the WAPC; and
· No ability for a closely related third party, or any other third party, to lodge an appeal against a local government planning decision.
WALGA has released the Minutes from the 7 August 2019 Annual General Meeting, which provides some comment from the Members and Secretariat on this matter. The relevant extract of the Minutes from that Annual General Meeting is included in Attachment 2. However, no discussion paper was released by WALGA that provides a detailed analysis of the implications of changing the Preferred Model to align with the motion above.
WALGA State Council will be considering the above Motion at its upcoming meeting scheduled for 4 March 2020. In the meantime, WALGA has requested comment from its local government members by 30 January 2020 indicating whether they support this motion. Administration has already sought an extension of time from WALGA until 14 February 2020, for Council to provide its submission.
Consultation
WALGA has undertaken consultation with its local government members on this matter. Therefore, Administration did not consider there to be a need for the City to undertake its own consultation on the matters subject to this Report.
Comment
WALGA’s current Preferred Model advocates for granting third party appeal rights to local governments against decisions made by DAP’s. Council in its previous resolutions on third party appeals did not support a comprehensive introduction of third party appeals in Western Australia, but expressed merit in the introduction of third party appeals in limited circumstances where decisions have been made by DAPs.
Administration Comment on Proposed Amendments to the Preferred Model
Administration makes the following observations with the proposed amendments to the Preferred Model:
· The current Preferred Model only allows for third party appeals to be lodged against a decision made by a DAP, which only makes decisions on development applications. The proposed amendments would allow local governments and closely related third parties to appeal ‘decisions’ made by the WAPC, SAT, and DAP. The proposed amendments are not clear on what ‘decisions’ would be open to third party appeals. The WAPC and the SAT, for example, make planning decisions on subdivisions, structure plans and development applications.
· The proposed amendments to the Preferred Model specify that ‘closely associated third parties’ could lodge an appeal against certain decisions made by the WAPC, SAT and DAP. However, the information provided by WALGA does not propose criteria, parameters or limitations on how or when such third parties could lodge an appeal.
· More comprehensive third party appeal rights and opportunities could result in the creation of a significant burden on the statutory planning system, particularly for local government. For example, increasing the scope for third party appeals will likely have resource implications on the finances and personnel of a local government, even if third party appeals are not made against a local government decision. Local government officers would be called to participate in appeals lodged by third parties, particularly if the respective local government was responsible for assessing, reporting and providing a recommendation on the matter the subject of a third party appeal.
· The amendments to the Preferred Model propose that ‘closely associated third parties’, in addition to local governments, could lodge a third party appeal. It is unclear what criteria defines ‘closely associated third parties’ in the context of this motion; whether they are submitters of an objection to a development application, nearby affected landowners or occupiers, another government agency, or a range of other parties.
· Proposed amendments to the Preferred Model consider granting ‘closely associated third parties’ the ability to appeal decisions made by the WAPC, the SAT or a DAP. However, no ability is proposed for the ‘closely associated third parties’ to appeal a decision made by a local government. It could be viewed that this aspect of the proposal lacks procedural fairness for third parties, as third parties should have the same rights to appeal a local government decision, if given the right to appeal a planning decision made by any other authority. This would have a very significant resource implication on local government, should third parties start to submit appeals against planning decisions they do not agree with.
· It is unclear how third party appeals against a decision made by the SAT would operate. Currently, third parties can already participate in SAT reviews in a limited capacity (at the discretion of the SAT), as outlined later in this Report. The State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 does not currently allow a decision made by the SAT to be appealed at the SAT, but rather prescribes that appeals of SAT decisions can only be made in the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court. An appeal against a SAT decision can only be brought on a question of law, and not simply on the basis that a party is aggrieved by a decision.
Ability for Third Parties to Participate in Development Assessment and Appeals
The current process for assessing development applications enables community members and public authorities to make submissions when such a proposal is advertised. The relevant approval authority (including a DAP) is then required to have due regard to the content of any submissions received.
The current system enables third parties to be involved in the SAT review process at the discretion of the SAT. A third party cannot lodge their own appeal against a planning decision and can only participate where an application for review is sought by an applicant. Third party involvement may include:
· Being called as a witness by the respondent;
· Making a submission under s242 of the Planning and Development Act 2005;
· Intervening in proceedings pursuant to s37(3) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004; and
· Participation in mediation (at the invitation and discretion of the SAT).
State Government Position on Third Party Appeals
WALGA’s Preferred Model, or any amendments made to the Preferred Model, is not a policy position of the State Government. As outlined in a response provided to WALGA by the Minister for Planning (refer Attachment 2), the current Preferred Model has not received support from the State Government. Any change to the appeals process would require consultation and significant legislative changes.
Conclusion
The proposed amendments present a wider range of scope for third party appeals to what the WALGA Preferred Model currently presents. As outlined above, Council did not support the introduction of a comprehensive third party appeal process when it made previous resolutions in respect to this matter. Consistent with Council’s previous position on this matter, Administration is recommending that Council not support the proposed amendments to WALGA’s Preferred Model on third party appeal rights.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.3 Advocate and collaborate for the benefit of the City”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights into the planning system would likely prompt the need for the City to introduce a new Local Planning Policy – or undertake a review to the current Local Planning Policy 4.17: State Administrative Tribunal.
Financial Implications
The introduction of limited third party appeal rights, as per the WALGA Preferred Model, amendments to that Model or otherwise, would likely increase the number of appeals the City would be required to participate in. This would also increase the demand for town planning and legal resources that the City would require in responding to and participating in appeals.
The cost to respond to each SAT appeal varies considerably. In some instances, appeals are responded to by Administration (without assistance from external consultants), and therefore costs responding to such matters are kept to operational costs. When the City does engage external consultants to assist in responding to a SAT appeal, monetary costs on the City typically vary from $10,000 to in excess of $200,000, with an additional operational cost in maintaining engagement with the appointed consultants.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOT SUPPORT the following motion which was carried at the 7 August 2019 Annual General Meeting of the Western Australian Local Government Association:
1. That there be an amendment to the Third Party Appeals Process Preferred Model, being that third parties in addition to Local Governments are able to make an appeal.
2. That there be an amendment to the Third Party Appeals Process Preferred Model, being that closely associated third parties in addition to Local Governments are able to appeal decisions made by the Western Australian Planning Commission and the State Administrative Tribunal, in addition to Development Assessment Panels.
2. REAFFIRMS its previous resolution carried at the 22 August 2017 Ordinary Council Meeting (PS04-08/17), which was as follows:
That Council:-
1. ADVISES WALGA that it does not support a comprehensive introduction of Third Party Appeals into the Western Australian planning framework, however, considers that there would be some merit in the introduction of Third Party Appeal Rights in limited circumstances where determinations have been issued by the Development Assessment Panels; and
2. NOTES that public confidence in the DAPs decision making process is likely to be enhanced by introducing Third Party Appeal Rights in limited circumstances, particularly when transparency and accountability is clearly demonstrated in the determination process.
3. REAFFIRMS its position carried at the 5 February 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting (PS07-02/19) that ‘limited circumstances’ in the context of the resolution carried at the 22 August 2017 Ordinary Council Meeting (PS04-08/17) relates to extending Third Party Appeal Rights to a responsible authority for applications determined by the Development Assessment Panel in a manner inconsistent with a recommendation prepared by those parties; and
4. ADVISES the Western Australian Local Government Association of this decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - February 2020 Report - Preferred model - Third Party Appeal Rights for Decisions made by Development Assessment Panels |
19/456609 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Extract from WALGA Annual General Meeting Minutes from 7 August 2019 - Item 3.9: Third Party Appeal Rights |
19/457984 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 20
PS03-02/20 Draft legislative amendment to Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure
File Ref: 20513 – 20/27035
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a draft legislative amendment to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 relating to Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure.
Background
The Container Deposit Scheme (CDS) will commence in Western Australia on 2 June 2020. The scheme will allow consumers to take specified empty beverage containers to a refund point to receive a refund of 10 cents. The CDS was introduced by an amendment to the Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2007. CDS refund points and recycling centres will be operated by parties holding a contract with WARRRL (WA Return Renew Recycle), who has been appointed as Scheme Coordinator in Western Australia.
The WAPC is seeking comment on amendments to the Planning and Development Regulations that are intended to ensure that CDS sites can be developed with speed and certainty by ensuring that standardised provisions apply in all Local Authority jurisdictions.
The following is a brief timeline of the progress of implementation of the CDS.
· In December 2018, the DPLH released draft Position Statement: Deposit Scheme Infrastructure to assist local governments in dealing with proposals for these developments.
· On 5 March 2019 Council resolved to broadly support the intent of the then draft WAPC Position Statement: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure (refer PS008-03/19).
· The WAPC adopted its Position Statement in May 2019. The Position Statement includes a Model Local Planning Policy (MLPP) for local governments to consider adopting. The MLPP sets out model exemptions from development approval for certain CDS infrastructure.
· In late December 2019, the DPLH released for comment a draft legislative amendment to the Regulations relating to CDS Infrastructure.
· The public comment period closes on Friday 7 February 2020, however, the DPLH has agreed to an extension to allow Council to endorse the City’s response at its February meeting.
A copy of the draft legislative amendment to the Regulations is provided as Attachment 1. The WAPC’s Position Statement is provided as Attachment 2.
Council is also considering draft Local Planning Policy 4.28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure at this meeting.
Detail
The draft legislative amendment proposes to modify the deemed provisions which are contained within Schedule 2 of the Regulations. The deemed provisions apply to all local planning schemes within Western Australia overriding existing provisions. Any changes to the deemed provisions will automatically form part of DPS2 once gazetted.
The draft amendment to the Regulations will provide exemptions for reverse vending machines and collection cages (hereafter referred to as CDS infrastructure) outside of residential areas and container deposit scheme recycling centres proposed within existing buildings outside of residential areas. Key points relating to the proposed amendment include:
· Inclusion of a sunset clause to CDS infrastructure deemed exempt that is functioning by 1 June 2021; and
· Exemptions for container deposit scheme recycling centres only relate to works being undertaken within a pre-existing building – they do not apply to works such as the construction of a warehouse or shed.
In addition, the draft amendment proposes to define a heritage protected place to simplify the deemed provisions. Administration has no concerns with this element of the amendment which will not be discussed further in this report.
Consultation
This report has been prepared for Council to consider providing a response to the WAPC on its consultation on the matter. Members of the community are able to make comment on the matter directly to the WAPC. Administration will provide a copy of Council’s adopted submission to WALGA.
Comment
The DPLH has advised that the intent of the amendment to the Regulations is to provide exemption from development approval for specific CDS developments. Administration generally supports exempting development from needing approval where the land use and physical form has no impact on the amenity of an area.
Administration considers that amending the Regulations is unnecessary and that the matter of exemptions can be dealt with by a local planning policy. Amending the Regulations will result in automatic and mandatory development standards that have no regard for the established built form and amenity within individual local government areas. In addition, Administration is concerned that the proposed amendment to the Regulations does not follow the proper planning process for the classification of land use and it will facilitate development which may detrimentally impact an area without triggering any requirement for development approval.
All local planning schemes contain land use terms and a zoning table which sets the land use permissibility for these uses within relevant zones of the scheme. Land use terms not defined in this schedule or contained in the zoning table are treated as Unlisted Uses in accordance with Clause 3.3 of DPS2. A local government is required to consider an application for development approval against the land use terms and zoning table within its scheme, and apply the requirements of the most appropriate land use.
The draft amendment to the Regulations is proposing to insert a clause into Part 7 of the deemed provisions titled’ terms used’. A ‘terms used’ section is used to define terms commonly used throughout legislation and is separate from land use terms as defined within the scheme. Draft clause 59A includes definitions for ‘container collection cage’, ‘container deposit recycling centre’, ‘drop-off refund point’, and ‘reverse vending machine’. These ‘terms’ are referenced in exemptions throughout the draft amendment inferring a local government should be applying these terms as though they are bona-fide land uses under the scheme. It is questionable whether these ‘terms’ can be applied as land use terms in lieu of those contained within the defined uses under the scheme and within the zoning table.
The draft amendment includes a number of development standards whereby compliant proposals would be exempt from development approval providing no part of the development is in a heritage protected place or within a residential area (where the R-Codes apply). Notwithstanding Administration’s concerns on the validity of using these terms as proxies for defined land uses, examples of situations the draft provisions will allow and resulting issues are provided below:
· A reverse vending machine to be placed on a commercial or service industrial lot with a two metre street setback despite DPS2 prescribing a six metre setback. This may be contrary to established development and have a detrimental impact on the streetscape.
· A reverse vending machine and/or container collection cage within an existing car park with more than 40 spaces occupying up to four car parking spaces or 45m2 where the carpark has between 41 – 200 spaces, and 75m2 in any other case. These requirements do not enable any consideration of existing parking shortfalls which could result in parking and congestion issues within developments as a result of exempt CDS developments.
A copy of Administrations draft response to the DPLH is provided as Attachment 3, which includes a table identifying a number of administrative and technical concerns.
Statutory Compliance
In the event the draft amendment is gazetted these provisions will automatically form part of DPS2 and the City will be required to comply with, and where appropriate, enforce these new provisions.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.3 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Waste
3.3.1 Treat waste as a resource”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The gazettal of the draft legislative amendment to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) 2015 may negate the requirement for draft Local Planning Policy 4.28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure.
Financial Implications
N/A
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES Administration’s response to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage provided in Attachment 3 on the draft legislative amendment to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
2. ADVISES the Western Australian Local Government Association of this decision.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Legislative Amendment Container Deposit Scheme |
20/17462 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - WAPC Position Statement: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure |
20/2505 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Comments on draft legislative amendment |
20/27259 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 54
PS04-02/20 Consideration of Draft Local Planning Policy 4.28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure
File Ref: 39936 – 20/2756
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider draft Local Planning Policy 4:28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure (draft LPP 4.28).
Background
The Container Deposit Scheme (CDS) will commence in Western Australia on 2 June 2020. The scheme will allow consumers to take specified empty beverage containers to a refund point to receive a refund of 10 cents. The CDS was introduced by an amendment to the Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2007. CDS refund points and recycling centres will be operated by parties holding a contract with WARRRL (WA Return Renew Recycle), who has been appointed as Scheme Coordinator in Western Australia.
The WAPC is seeking comment on amendments to the Planning and Development Regulations that are intended to ensure that CDS sites can be developed with speed and certainty by ensuring that standardised provisions apply in all Local Authority jurisdictions.
The following is a brief timeline of the progress of implementation of the CDS.
· In December 2018, the DPLH released draft Position Statement: Deposit Scheme Infrastructure to assist local governments in dealing with proposals for these developments;
· On 5 March 2019 Council resolved to broadly support the intent of the then draft WAPC Position Statement: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure (refer PS008-03/19);
· The WAPC adopted its Position Statement in May 2019. The Position Statement includes a Model Local Planning Policy (MLPP) for local governments to consider adopting. The MLPP sets out model exemptions from development approval for certain CDS infrastructure;
· In late December 2019, the DPLH released for comment a draft legislative amendment to the Regulations relating to CDS Infrastructure; and
· The public comment period closes on Friday 7 February 2020, however, the DPLH has agreed to an extension to allow Council to endorse the City’s response at its February meeting.
As the WA government intends for the CDS to be operational by the middle of the year, it is now necessary to commence preparation of a local planning policy. Initiation of a new local planning policy will ensure that the City is ready for implementation of the CDS.
A copy of the draft legislative amendment to the Regulations is provided as Attachment 1.
The WAPC’s Position Statement including the MLPP is provided as Attachment 2.
Detail
The MLPP prepared by the DPLH provides exemptions for CDS infrastructure including container collection cages and reverse vending machines. The MLPP specifies the following exemptions:
· Large reverse vending machines which meet the development standards of the policy, except within the following zones:
o Residential, urban development, special residential, rural, rural residential and rural smallholding zones.
· Container collection cages which meet the development standards of the policy in any zone where the land is lawfully used for the purposes of a civic use, community purpose or education establishment.
The development standards of the MLPP relate to location, amenity, operational amenity and the development footprint.
The Position Statement states that local governments are not required to advertise a local planning policy that is consistent with the MLPP. However Administration is recommending that the Council adopt a Local Planning Policy that varies from the MLPP and therefore will require public consultation.
Images of CDS Infrastructure are provided in Attachment 3.
Consultation
The MLPP does not address the City’s needs in regards to building setbacks and signage provisions. As such, Administration is proposing to modify the MLPP to address these matters and therefore, public consultation will be required.
Clause 4(2) of the deemed provisions of DPS2 requires a draft local planning policy to be advertised for a minimum of 21 days, although the City will normally advertise a draft local planning policy for 42 days.
Following the advertising period, a summary of submissions received and Administration’s responses to those submissions will be included in a report to Council to consider final adoption of the draft LPP 4.28.
Administration also proposes to forward a copy of Council’s resolution to WALGA to keep them informed of the Council’s position in relation to the roll out of the CDS.
Comment
Administration seeks to modify the MLPP prepared by the DPLH to ensure the City’s local planning policy responds to the local context. The main concerns Administration has in adopting the MLPP verbatim relate to street setbacks, signage and placement of infrastructure within existing car parking spaces.
The MLPP permits CDS infrastructure to have a minimum two metre setback from the street as of right. However DPS2 prescribes a six metre primary street setback and a three metre secondary street setback. In addition, DPS2 prescribes the first three metres of a lot should be used as a means of access and landscaping only. If the MLPP provisions were applied, the City could end up with reverse vending machines setback two metres from the boundary creating an inconsistent street setback. This outcome has the potential to detrimentally impact established and intended streetscapes and is not supported.
The MLPP allows branding and promotional material associated with the CDS to be placed on the infrastructure. However, no information on the size, number and type of signs has been provided to the City and therefore Administration is unable to determine whether such development will be consistent with the objectives contained within DPS2 for signage. Therefore, it is recommended that the signage exemption for CDS infrastructure not form part of draft LPP 4.28.
Lastly, the MLPP allows for CDS infrastructure to be placed within existing car parking bays subject to controls on the size of the car park and infrastructure. However, these exemptions do not account for any existing on-site parking requirements or preapproved shortfalls or other known parking issues. As such exempting development that may create or exacerbate a parking problem cannot be supported. The draft LPP 4.28 removes any reference to infrastructure placed in existing parking bays being exempt.
A copy of draft LPP 4.28 is provided in Attachment 4.
A summary of comparison of the MLPP against draft LPP 4.28 is provided in Attachment 5.
In the event the draft legislative amendment is gazetted, there may be no requirement for a local planning policy. Notwithstanding, Administration considers it prudent to progress the policy to ensure our planning framework provides appropriate controls for CDS infrastructure should the legislative amendment not take effect.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions for Local Planning Schemes contained within Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (DPS2 Deemed Provisions), Council can resolve to adopt a LPP. Draft amendments to the WAPC’s MLPP must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days, after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Natural)
3.3 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Waste
3.3.3 Create and promote waste management solutions”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O22 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers.
Policy Implications
The draft LPP includes relevant development standards relating to CDS infrastructure and facilities and will assist Administration in the dealing of future development applications.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with the preparation of the LPP can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
1. That Council, pursuant to Clauses 4 and 5 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, resolves to PREPARE draft Local Planning Policy 4.28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure, as contained in Attachment 4, and ADVERTISE it for public comment for a period of 21 days by way of following:
a) An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period; and
b) Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
2. A copy of draft Local Planning Policy 4.28: Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure and Council Report be FORWARDED to WALGA for their information.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Legislative Amendment Container Deposit Scheme |
20/17462 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - WAPC Position Statement and Model Local Planning Policy - Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure |
20/2505 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure Examples |
19/43942 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Draft Local Planning Policy 4.28 - Container Deposit Scheme Policy (PDF Version) |
20/2498 |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Proposed changes to WAPC s MLPP - Container Deposit Scheme Infrastructure |
20/22615 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 101
File Ref: 4083 – 19/365417
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation (LPP 2.6), which is due for review.
Background
At its 7 February 2017 meeting (PS04-02/17), Council resolved to adopt LPP 2.6 (existing policy). The existing policy provides clarity and guidance for the City and the public regarding the development assessment of ancillary accommodation. A review of LPP 2.6 was scheduled to be conducted two years from its adoption, and is now due.
Another purpose of this review of LPP 2.6 is to refine the existing policy provisions, and introduce new provisions. In particular, it is proposed that this review be utilised to introduce design standards for ancillary accommodation.
Detail
Administration has commenced the review of LPP 2.6, and has prepared draft amendments to the policy as included in Attachment 1.
The existing policy already provides the following, which Administration is proposing to retain and refine:
· Policy objectives – which through this review are proposed to be refined and expanded to better respond to visual amenity and built form;
· An explanation of the difference between ‘ancillary accommodation’ and ‘detached extensions’ to dwellings (such as sleep-outs, pool rooms and sewing rooms); and
· Provisions for ancillary accommodation where the provisions of State Planning Policy 7.3: Residential Design Codes Volume 1 (R-Codes) do not apply (e.g. in the rural zones and the Special Residential Zone). In particular, Administration proposes to introduce a provision relating to the use of building materials for ancillary accommodation in these areas.
The existing policy prescribes a maximum floor area for ancillary accommodation of 70m2 where the R-Codes apply, and up to 100m2 where the R-Codes do not apply (e.g. in rural areas). Administration is not proposing the maximums prescribed be adjusted through this policy review.
Further to the above, it is proposed that provisions relating to ancillary accommodation be added to LPP 2.6 to amend the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes. The mechanism to amend deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes through a local planning policy is outlined in Part 7 of the R-Codes. The amended deemed-to-comply provisions that are proposed for LPP 2.6 will guide the development of ancillary accommodation in areas where the R-Codes apply (such as in residential areas).
The deemed-to-comply provisions are proposed to be amended to include a provision requiring ancillary accommodation to be constructed of matching built form as the single house to which it is ancillary. The term ‘matching built form’ would then be defined through the policy as follows:
“Matching Built Form: means a built form for ancillary accommodation that is the same as that of the Single House to which it is ancillary – by way of colour, texture and materials used in the construction of external walls; roof material, colour and pitch; and floor to ceiling height.”
Where a proposal does not meet the proposed deemed-to-comply provisions (i.e. does not match the existing dwelling), a development application will be assessed against Local Housing Objectives which are also proposed to be inserted into LPP 2.6. None of the proposed objectives require ancillary accommodation to exactly match an existing dwelling. The Local Housing Objectives focus on ensuring that the ancillary accommodation will be compatible with its context and not detract from the character of the street or neighbouring properties.
The purpose of Local Housing Objectives is to set a flexible framework for judging the merits of a proposal. The Local Housing Objectives have been prepared and worded so that they can be applied to ancillary accommodation in both residential and non-residential (e.g. rural) settings.
A marked-up version of the draft amendments to the policy document, which shows the full extent of the proposed amendments to LPP 2.6, is provided as Attachment 2. The existing policy as adopted in February 2017 is provided as Attachment 3.
Consultation
Administration requires Council’s resolution under the DPS2 Deemed Provisions to formally ‘prepare’ the amendments to LPP 2.6 as provided in Attachment 1, and for the proposed amendments to LPP 2.6 to be advertised for no less than 21 days.
It is proposed to advertise the draft amendments to LPP 2.6 for a period of 42 days. This is consistent with the way amendments to other local planning policies have been advertised. Advertising will be undertaken by way of the following:
· Notification in Wanneroo Times newspaper;
· Display at the Civic Centre and on the City’s website; and
· Notification to State Government agencies and other relevant stakeholders.
Following advertising, Administration intends to seek Council’s resolution pursuant to the DPS2 Deemed Provisions to either:
· Proceed (or adopt) the amendments to LPP 2.6, as advertised or modified in light of any submissions received through advertising; or
· Not proceed with (or not adopt) the amendments to LPP 2.6.
Some of the proposed amendments to the policy are inconsistent with the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes. Under Clause 4(1)(b) of the DPS2 Deemed Provisions, the City must give notice of a proposed policy to the WAPC when a proposed local planning policy is advertised that is inconsistent with State Planning Policy. Administration intends to also give notice to the WAPC should Council resolve to advertise proposed amendments to LPP 2.6.
Comment
The proposed amendments to LPP 2.6 are based on sound planning principles and address operational considerations in the assessment of ancillary accommodation. Amendments proposed by Administration improve the legibility and clarity of LPP 2.6, and will ensure the planning framework sets appropriate controls for ancillary accommodation.
Amending Deemed-to-Comply Provisions to Require Development Approval
Currently under the DPS2 Deemed Provisions, development approval is exempt where ancillary accommodation in the Residential Zone meets:
· The current deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes; or
· A requirement in a local planning policy that amends or replaces the deemed-to-comply requirement of the R-Codes.
Ancillary accommodation is currently exempt from development approval where all the current deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes are met. The deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes do not contain provisions relating to the built form for ancillary accommodation. Therefore, ancillary accommodation development can be exempt from needing development approval even if the appearance of the structure is undesirable and impacts on the character of the street or on the amenity of neighbouring properties.
It is proposed to amend the deemed-to-comply provisions through LPP 2.6 to include requirements relating to the built form of ancillary accommodation, and it to match that of a single house on the same lot. If the draft amendments to LPP 2.6 were to be adopted as proposed, a development approval would not be required if an ancillary accommodation met the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes and was constructed to the same built form as a single house on the same lot.
For ancillary accommodation proposals that do not meet the amended deemed-to-comply provisions proposed for LPP 2.6, such proposals would then be directed through the development assessment process. For such proposals to be approved, the relevant Design Principles of the R-Codes would need to be satisfied, as well as the Local Housing Objectives proposed to be included in LPP 2.6. It is intended that this development assessment process could prevent construction of ancillary accommodation that is out of character with the site and surrounds.
Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage Advice and WAPC Approval
Administration has previously sought preliminary advice from officers at the DPLH on the amendments to the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes proposed through the review of LPP 2.6. DPLH supports the City’s intent to address building design and appearance of ancillary accommodation through the review of LPP 2.6.
The advice received from DPLH has been prepared by their officers, and does not constitute a formal approval to amend the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes through LPP 2.6. Pursuant to Clause 7.3.2 of the R-Codes, the City still requires a formal approval from the WAPC to amend the deemed-to-comply provisions of the R-Codes. In moving forward, it is recommended that Council seek formal WAPC approval of the proposed amendments to the deemed-to-comply provisions, whilst the proposed amendments to LPP 2.6 are being advertised.
Statutory Compliance
Council can resolve to amend a local planning policy in accordance with Clauses 4 and 5 of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes contained within Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (DPS2 Deemed Provisions). Draft amendments to a policy, which are not minor, must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days; after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceeded with.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.6 Housing Choice
3.6.1 Facilitate housing diversity to reflect changing community needs”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report. However, Administration acknowledges that unforeseen issues with applying local planning policies are more likely to arise if policies are not reviewed on a regular basis.
Policy Implications
Amendments to LPP 2.6 are intended to update the City’s guidance in assessing and determining applications for development approval for ancillary accommodation in the City.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with undertaking the review of LPP 2.6 can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 4(1), Clause 4(2) and Clause 5 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, PREPARES amendments to Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation, as contained in Attachment 1, and ADVERTISES the amendments for public comment for a period of at least 42 days;
2. Pursuant to Clause 4(1)(b) of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2:
a) CONSIDERS that the amendments to Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation, as contained in Attachment 1, provide deemed-to-comply provisions for ancillary accommodation that are inconsistent with equivalent provisions for ancillary accommodation contained within State Planning Policy 7.3: Residential Design Codes Volume 1;
b) GIVES NOTICE to the Western Australian Planning Commission when advertising the amendments to Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation pursuant to Item (1) above; and
3. Pursuant to Clause 7.3.2 of State Planning Policy 7.3: Residential Design Codes Volume 1, REQUESTS approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission to amend, through Local Planning Policy 2.6: Ancillary Accommodation, the deemed-to-comply provisions for Ancillary Dwellings in Clause 5.5.1 of State Planning Policy 7.3: Residential Design Codes Volume 1, as follows:
“Ancillary dwelling associated with a single house and on the same lot where:
i. the lot is not less than 450m2 in area;
ii. there is a maximum plot ratio area of 70m2;
iii. ancillary accommodation constructed of matching built form as the single house to which it is ancillary.
iv. parking provided in accordance with Clause 5.3.3 C3.1 of the R-Codes; and
v. complies with all other R-Code provisions, only as they apply to single houses, with the exception of Clauses:
(a) 5.1.1 Site area;
(b) 5.2.3 Street surveillance (except where located on a lot with secondary street or right-of-way access); and
(c) 5.3.1 Outdoor living areas.”
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Amended LPP 2.6 Prepared for Advertising |
19/457437 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Marked Up Version - 2020 Revisions to Local Planning Policy 2.6 Ancillary Accommodation |
20/26832 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Existing Local Planning Policy 2.6 Ancillary Accommodation |
16/435851 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 117
PS06-02/20 Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Various Modifications Affecting the Special Residential Zone
File Ref: 38398 – 19/445180
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the submissions received during the public advertising of Amendment No. 180 to DPS2.
Background
Rationale for the DPS2 Amendment
Council previously considered on a development application for a child care centre at Harbour Elbow, Banksia Grove (refer PS04-10/18 and PS02-05/19). Through considerations of that application, Council became aware of the concerns that can arise from the establishment of non-residential land uses in the Special Residential Zone.
The impact of an individual non-residential land use in a Special Residential Zone can be properly managed through sensitive design and appropriate conditions of approval. However, the cumulative impact of multiple non-residential uses in close proximity within a Special Residential Zone will likely detract from the intended low density residential character. In this regard an accumulation of non-residential land uses in the Special Residential Zone could compromise and erode the purpose of the zone, which is to establish a low-density and spacious residential environment. In response, one of the purposes of Amendment No. 180 is to reduce the range of non-residential land uses that are capable of approval in the Special Residential zone.
Attachment 1 shows the location of the City’s Special Residential Zones. Special Provisions for six defined Special Residential zoned areas are provided for in Schedule 11 (Special Provisions) of DPS2. In addition to the above, Amendment No. 180 also proposes to remove the now redundant Special Provisions from Schedule 11 as they relate to Lot 51 (2) Travertine Vista, Carramar (formerly Lot 51 (575) Flynn Drive, Carramar) as this lot was rezoned to Urban Development in 2013. The provisions in Schedule 11 were not amended when Lot 51 was rezoned to Urban Development and this additional action will rectify the matter.
Council’s Previous Considerations on the DPS2 Amendment
Council at its 30 July 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting resolved to prepare (or initiate) Amendment No. 180 (PS07-07/19). The amendment proposal was then subsequently advertised as outlined later in this Report. Council’s previous resolution on Amendment No. 180 was as follows:
“That Council:
1. PREPARES Amendment No. 180 to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, to amend the local planning scheme by:
a) Modifying the permissibility of the following land uses from discretionary (‘D’) to not permitted (‘X’) in the Special Residential Zone:
i. Cattery
ii. Child Care Centre
iii. Consulting Room
b) Deleting Special Residential No. 6 from Schedule 11;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a Complex Amendment for the following reason:
An amendment that is not addressed by any local planning strategy.
3. Pursuant to Regulation 37(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUBMITS two (2) copies of the Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission for its consideration;
4. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 REFERS Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority;
5. Subject to approval from the Environmental Protection Authority and the Western Australian Planning Commission, ADVERTISES Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 60 days pursuant to Regulation 38 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
6. NOTES that a further amendment to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 will be presented to Council’s 27 August 2019 Meeting, to address administrative errors that have inadvertently resulted in District Planning Scheme No. 2 prescribing land use permissibility of ‘holiday accommodation’ as discretionary (‘D’) in the General Rural, Special Rural, Special Residential and Landscape Enhancement Zones.”
Detail
Amendment No. 180 to DPS2 proposes the following:
a) Changes to land use permissibility in the Special Residential Zone:
Amendment No. 180 to DPS2 proposes to modify land use permissibility to the extent as set out below:
|
Land Use |
Current Permissibility in the Special Residential Zone |
Proposed Permissibility in the Special Residential Zone |
|
Cattery |
D |
X |
|
Child Care Centre |
D |
X |
|
Consulting Room |
D |
X |
Amendment No. 180 does not propose changes to land use permissibility for ‘ancillary accommodation’, ‘bed and breakfast’, ‘holiday accommodation’, ‘holiday house’, ‘home business (category 1-3), ‘mast or antenna’, ‘park’ and ‘single house’; which would remain either discretionary (‘D’) or permitted (‘P’). All other land uses are not permitted (or ‘X’) in the Special Residential Zone, which Amendment No. 180 does not propose to change.
b) Deletion of Special Provisions
DPS2 includes Special Provisions for Special Residential Zone No. 6 relating to Lot 51 (2) Travertine Vista, Carramar. However these provisions are now redundant given that Lot 51 was rezoned to Urban Development in October 2013. Woodland Vista Local Structure Plan No. 92 (LSP 92) affects Lot 51, and supports residential subdivision with a density code of between R25 and R30. Amendment No. 180 proposes to delete the defunct Special Provisions contained in Schedule 11 of DPS2 relating to Special Residential Zone No. 6.
Consultation
In accordance with Council’s previous resolution, the amendment was referred to the EPA for comment. In response, the EPA advised the City that the scheme amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. Being a complex amendment, Amendment No. 180 was also referred to WAPC for initial consideration, also in accordance with Council’s previous resolution. In its response, the WAPC advised that the amendment was suitable to be advertised for public submissions.
Advertising of Amendment No. 180 was carried out between 24 October 2019 and 23 December 2019 by way of:
· An advertisement in the 24 October 2019 edition of the ‘Wanneroo Times’ local newspaper;
· Letter to landowners and occupiers of land zoned Special Residential (under DPS2 and designated under a structure plan), as well as the landowner and occupier of 51 (2) Travertine Vista, Carramar;
· A notice sent to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage as well as the Department of Communities; and
· Notices in Council offices and the City’s website.
The City received four submissions on the amendment proposal. All the submissions received either supported the amendment proposal or expressed no objection. A summary of the submissions received, including Administration’s response to those submissions, is included in Attachment 2.
Comment
Compatibility of Non-Residential Land Uses in the Special Residential Zone
The benefit of having child care centres and consulting rooms in the Special Residential Zone is that it provides such services in easy access to the residents of the surrounding residential development.
However, DPS2 does recognise that child care centres and consulting rooms may not always be appropriate in the Special Residential Zone, and therefore lists these uses as discretionary (‘D’) in the zone. While an individual non-residential use in isolation may be acceptable, the possibility exists that over time an accumulation of such uses in the Special Residential Zone could occur. This outcome would impact the intended purpose and character of the zone, which is to provide for low-density and spacious form of residential living.
The objectives of the Residential Zone, for example, support the provision of ‘compatible urban support services’, which could include child care centres and consulting rooms. Child care centres and consulting rooms are also discretionary (‘D’) in the Residential Zone, as they are in the Special Residential Zone. However, there is no equivalent objective that exists in DPS2 for the Special Residential Zone. As the objective for the Special Residential Zone does not include statements on the provision of “urban support services” and focuses on low density residential, Administration considers there is merit in making child care centres and consulting rooms not permitted. Furthermore, given the higher density of living in a Residential Zone, an accumulation of child care centres and consulting rooms in the Residential zone would not have as much of an impact on residents compared to an accumulation of these uses in the Special Residential Zone.
Administration considers that either a single cattery in the Special Residential Zone, or an accumulation of catteries, has the potential to impact on local amenity of the zone by way of odour and noise; and therefore should not be a use that can be accommodated in the Special Residential Zone.
Justification to Delete Special Provisions Affecting Lot 51 Flynn Drive, Carramar
DPS2 also includes Special Residential Provisions in Schedule 11 (Special Provisions), for six defined Special Residential Zoned areas; including Special Residential Zone No. 6 which applies to Lot 51 (2) Travertine Vista, Carramar (formerly Lot 51 (575) Flynn Drive, Carramar).
Lot 51 was however the subject of an amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) in 2013, to rezone this land from ‘Rural’ to Urban’. At the time, Administration requested the WAPC to amend DPS2, to rezone the land from ‘Special Residential’ to ‘Urban Development’, to align DPS2 with what was proposed through the MRS amendment. The WAPC agreed to this request, and Lot 51 was rezoned to ‘Urban Development’ effective 1 October 2013. An unintended consequence of that rezoning was that the Special Provisions relating to Lot 51 remained in Schedule 11 of DPS2. Amendment No. 180 proposes to address this issue by removing the Special Provisions from Schedule 11 as they relate to Lot 51 Flynn Drive, Carramar.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 180 was prepared by Administration and advertised in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations).
In accordance with the Regulations, Council is required to consider the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 180 and resolve to either support the amendment with or without modification – or alternatively not support the amendment. Administration is recommending that Council supports Amendment No. 180 in accordance with the Regulations, without modification.
Further, the Regulations require Council to provide the WAPC with (among other things) a copy of the resolution, a schedule of submissions and response to the submissions.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.4 Improve local amenity by retaining and complementing natural landscapes within the built environmental”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-019 Decision Making |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O03 Strategic Land |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans are in place/have been developed to manage/mitigate this risk.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost in preparing this amendment to DPS2 can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Regulation 41(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, CONSIDERS the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, a summary of which is included in Attachment 2;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 41(3)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUPPORTS the prepared Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, as resolved by Council at the 30 July 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting (PS07-07/19);
3. AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy;
4. Pursuant to Regulation 44 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and subject to Item 2. above, PROVIDES Amendment No. 180 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission; and
5. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Map Showing Location of Special Residential Zones |
19/267237 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Submission Schedule - Amendment No. 180 to DPS2 |
20/11276 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 125
PS07-02/20 Consideration of Amendment No. 179 to the District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Lots 1, 2, 7, 12, 13, 36 – 38 Caporn Street, Wanneroo
File Ref: 37190 – 20/12144
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a request to amend the District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) by rezoning Lots 1, 2, 7, 12, 13, 36 – 38 Caporn Street, Wanneroo (the subject lots) from Rural Resource to Urban Development and to modify the scheme map accordingly.
|
Applicant |
Taylor Burrell Barnett Town Planning |
|
Owners |
Perron Developments Pty Ltd, Quito Pty Ltd, Anthony Cosentino, Jillian Ding, Ian James & Anthony Del Borrello |
|
Location |
Lots 1, 2, 7, 12, 13, 36 – 38 Caporn Street, Wanneroo |
|
Site Area |
26.6 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Rural Resource |
Background
On 11 November 2019, Taylor Burrell Barnett on behalf of Quito Pty Ltd and Ian James requested the City to consider an amendment to DPS2 to rezone the subject lots from Rural Resource to Urban Development and to modify the scheme map accordingly.
On 14 February 2018, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) resolved to lift the Urban Deferment under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and notification of this decision was published in the Government Gazette 20 March 2018. The land is now zoned Urban under the MRS.
Section 124(3) of the Planning and Development Act (2005) requires DPS to be amended to be consistent with the MRS.
Detail
Site
The subject lots are located to the south of Caporn Street and adjoin the developed residential areas of Sinagra to the south and west. In DPS2 the land to the north of Caporn Street is zoned Rural Resource and the land to the east of the subject lots is zoned Special Rural. The location plan is included as Attachment 1. The subject lots are located within the western part of the future East Wanneroo urban area, which is subject to the draft East Wanneroo District Structure Plan (DSP), wherein these lots are designated as Suburban Neighbourhood (Attachment 2).
Proposal
The proposal is to amend DPS2 by rezoning the subject lots from Rural Resource to Urban Development.
The applicant justifies the proposal as follows:
· In accordance with Section 124(3) of the Planning and Development Act 2005, when a regional planning scheme is amended, a local planning scheme must be amended to be consistent with the regional planning scheme no later than 90 days after the day on which the amendment to the region planning scheme had effect. The subject lots being zoned Urban in the MRS, as occurred on 20 March 2018, the DPS2 needs to be amended to rezone the subject lots from Rural Resource to Urban Development.
Attachment 3 contains the amendment plan showing the existing and proposed zoning.
In March 2018, shortly after the subject lots were zoned Urban under the MRS, representatives of one of the landowners in the area (Perron Group) met with Administration. At this meeting it was agreed that the landowners would submit the application to amend DPS2 to enable them to consider what form of amendment they would prefer. Administration did not progress an amendment to DPS 2 on the basis it would be submitted by the landowners.
There has subsequently been consultation between representatives of two of the main land owners in the area (Perron Group and Benara Nurseries (Quito Pty Ltd and Mr Ian James)), and this has resulted in the present application being made in November 2019 by Taylor Burrell Barnett on behalf of Benara Nurseries, supported by Perron Group.
The proposed Urban Development zone is a precursor to the preparation of a Local Structure Plan (LSP) for the subject lots under the provisions of DPS2, which would then enable subdivision applications to be made.
Consultation
The applicant has considered the amendment as a ‘standard’ amendment under the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (‘the Regulations’) and this classification is supported.
Standard scheme amendments must be advertised for public comment. However, before doing so, the amendment will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to assess the environmental impacts of the proposal and to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is necessary.
Subject to no objections being received from the EPA, a standard amendment must be advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days. Advertising is to occur in the following manner, consistent with the requirements of the Regulations:
· Advertisement in a local newspaper for one week;
· Placement of a sign on affected sites, giving notice of the proposal;
· Display notice of the proposal in Council offices;
· Display on the City’s website; and
· Referral in writing to affected persons/agencies.
Comment
Council’s Local Planning Policy (LPP) 5.3: East Wanneroo states that the City shall not support applications of this type in the East Wanneroo area unless the land has first been zoned Urban under the MRS, and the pre-requisites to Urban zoning referred to in the policy have been satisfied.
While the land is zoned Urban, the pre-requisites referred to have not been satisfied as noted below:
· The draft DSP and associated studies have not been approved;
· The MRS has not been amended to reserve any regional reserves required by the draft DSP. (In its submission on the draft DSP, Council advised that Caporn Street should be designated as an ‘integrator arterial road’ on the DSP, in which case it would be reserved under the MRS); and
· A regional and district-level Development Contribution Plan for East Wanneroo is not in place.
The draft EWDSP outlines the planning process in three sequential parts as follows:
· District level processes are DSP, MRS amendment and District Development Contributions Scheme;
· Precinct level processes are lifting of Urban Deferment, Local Structure Plans, amendments to DPS2 and Local Development Contributions scheme; and
· Subdivision and development.
The subject application does not accord with this process.
Notwithstanding the LPP5.3 and draft DSP positions, Section 124(3) of the Planning and Development Act 2005 requires DPS2 to be amended to be consistent with the MRS and this overrides the City’s policy position as a higher order document.
In respect to development contributions being made, both Benara Nurseries and Perron Group acknowledge that in keeping with State Planning Policy (SPP) 3.6 – Development Contributions for Infrastructure, it is fair and equitable that such contributions are made.
Under the provisions of sub-clause 3.14.3 of DPS2 no subdivision or development should be commenced or carried out in the Urban Development zone until a structure plan has been prepared and approved by the WAPC. Discussions between Administration, the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage and the applicant have concluded that, given the fact that the subject lots are already zoned Urban under the MRS and the Act requires the DSP2 to be amended to conform with the MRS, the issue of developer contributions will need to be addressed at the structure planning stage rather than a through a formal developer contribution scheme being prepared for the East Wanneroo Area.
It is proposed that in this case the structure plan will need to include provisions requiring payment of developer contributions by the land owners. At the subdivision approval stage a condition will be imposed by the WAPC requiring payment of the contributions. A condition requiring a contribution will be applied on any subdivision approval given it will be embedded in the structure plan approved by the WAPC.
In respect to the possible reservation of Caporn Street as a regional road under the MRS (which may involve road widening), if this were to occur, with some of the reserve affecting the northern edge of the subject lots, then that reserve will automatically also apply to DPS2.
Statutory Compliance
Under Section 124(3) of the Act, the City is required to prepare an amendment to DPS2 to make it consistent with the MRS.
Under Clause 34 of the Regulations the amendment is considered to be a ‘Standard’ amendment for the following reason:
(c) an amendment of the scheme so that it is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area, other than an amendment that is a basic amendment.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.6 Housing Choice
3.6.1 Facilitate housing diversity to reflect changing community needs”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Planning |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
ELT (Director P&S and Director Assets) |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O22 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans are in place/have been developed to manage/mitigate this risk.
In addition to the above risks, there is a risk relating to obtaining development contributions in the absence of a Developer Contribution Scheme. This risk is mitigated through using the future local structure plan as the key instrument for facilitating developer contributions. The local structure plan provisions will trigger a subdivision condition requiring payment of a contribution in accordance with the local structure plan. Payment will be required before titles can be issued for any new lots.
Policy Implications
As discussed earlier in this report, LPP5.3: East Wanneroo provides that an amendment of this type should not be supported. However, the policy does not account for the effect of Section 124 (s) of the Act, which obliges the City to prepare this amendment to make DPS2 consistent with the MRS.
Financial Implications
Regulation 48 (2) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2009 provides that no fee can be imposed in respect to a request for a local scheme amendment which is requested to make the local scheme consistent with the MRS. The costs associated with undertaking this amendment will therefore need to be met by the City through normal operational budget provision.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 PREPARES Amendment No. 179 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone lots 1, 2, 7, 12, 13, 36, 37 and 38 Caporn Street, Wanneroo from Rural Resource to Urban Development;
2. Pursuant to Regulation 35 (2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (‘the Regulations’) RESOLVES that Amendment No. 179 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment for the following reason:
“It is an amendment to the scheme so that it is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area, other than an amendment that is a basic assessment.”
3. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 179 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority; and
4. Subject to Environmental Protection Authority approval ADVERTISES Amendment No. 179 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Regulations for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Amendment 179 to DPS2 |
20/12668 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Draft EW DSP |
20/13544 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Existing and proposed zoning map |
20/12658 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 134
PS08-02/20 Consideration of Amendment No. 4 to the East Wanneroo Cell 3 Approved Structure Plan No. 5
File Ref: 20608-04 – 18/450030
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 8
Issue
To consider submissions received during public advertising of Amendment No. 4 to the East Wanneroo Cell 3 Approved Structure Plan No. 5 (ASP5).
|
Applicant |
Catriona Tatum |
|
Owner |
Gabriel Morrow |
|
Location |
Lot 68 (71) High Road, Wanneroo |
|
Site Area |
2.0383 hectares |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS2 Zoning |
Residential |
Background
On 31 May 2017, the proponent requested the City consider an amendment to ASP5 to recode Lot 68 (71) High Road, Wanneroo (site) from Residential R20 to R40.
Detail
The site
The site is bounded by Amos Road to west and north and residential development to the east. A dwelling and shed gaining access from High Road are located on the site. The site is well vegetated. The East Wanneroo Primary School is approximately 150 metres south-west of the subject site. A location plan is provided as Attachment 1.
The Proposal
The applicant proposes to recode the site from Residential R20 to Residential R40 and justifies the proposal as follows:
· The site is located one kilometre from the Wanneroo Town Centre, 150 metres from the East Wanneroo Primary School and 400 metres from the Wanneroo Secondary College; and
· The site is serviced by public transport.
Attachment 2 is the amendment document including a map showing the existing and proposed density coding of the site.
Consultation
On 10 July 2017, the Manager, Approval Services advised the Mayor and the Elected Members that Administration was undertaking advertising of the amendment.
The Amendment was advertised for public comment for a period of 28 days from 18 July to 15 August 2017 by means of an on-site sign, an advertisement in the Wanneroo Times newspaper, the City’s website and letters written to adjoining landowners.
The City received 12 submissions, eleven of which objected to the proposal on the grounds of increased traffic and loss of vegetation. The twelfth submitter, the Department of Education, did not object to the proposal.
Administration did not finalise a report to Council immediately following public consultation as the applicant had yet to submit a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) as the site is identified as a bushfire prone area. A BMP was provided on 19 June 2019.
Due to the passage of time since the amendment was advertised on 18 July 2017, the City re-advertised the amendment for a period of 35 days (seven days more than the statutory period of 28 days) from 5 December 2019 to 9 January 2020 by way of writing to those to whom the City had written during the first round of advertising and placing a notice on the City’s website. The City received three submissions including one from the Department of Education. Two submissions objected to the proposal and the Department of Education did not raise any objection to the amendment proposal. Of the two submissions objecting to the proposal one was a joint submission signed by 12 residents.
A summary of submissions received during the two rounds of public comment period and Administration’s response to the issues raised in the submissions are included as Attachment 3.
The issues raised in the submissions objecting to the proposal are;
· Increase in traffic
· Loss of vegetation
· Does not satisfy the objective of LPP3.1 to provide affordable housing.
These issues are discussed in detail in the Comment section below.
Comment
Submitters’ Issues
Increase in Traffic
Concerns have been raised that the proposed amendment will generate a considerable volume of traffic that would affect the normal flow of traffic on Amos Road and High Road. To address the traffic issues the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA).
The amendment proposal could result in up to 64 dwellings. At a rate of 8 vehicle trips per dwelling per day, the total expected volume of traffic generated would be 512 vehicles per day (vpd) of which 40% (204 vpd) is expected to exit via Amos Road and 60% (308 vpd) via High Road.
Amos Road and High Road are 20 metres wide with a 7.2 metre wide carriageway. As per the provisions of the Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy, these roads have a capacity to carry an indicative traffic volume of 3,000 vpd. The 2018 traffic volumes on Amos Road and High Road were recorded as 419 and 1584 vpd respectively. On the basis of the above information, Administration considers that the additional volume of traffic generated by the potential future development will not impact the normal flow of traffic on these roads.
Some submitters have pointed out that if the lots created along High Road were to gain access from High Road it could cause some traffic issues during the school hours. Further consideration on access can be addressed at the subdivision stage. However, it would not be reasonable to restrict access to High Road in this regard.
Loss of vegetation
The applicant provided a Flora and Fauna Management Plan, which identifies the vegetation conditions as ranging from very good to completely degraded. Approximately 60% of the vegetation is degraded to completely degraded, 35% is in good condition and only about 5% is in very good condition. Attachment 4 is the vegetation condition map.
Recoding of the land to R40 is unlikely to result in any further loss of vegetation than would be lost if the land were to be developed at its current R20 coding. A condition requiring the identification and protection of any vegetation worthy of retention that is not impacted by the subdivisional works can be imposed by the WAPC in a future subdivision application.
Affordable Housing
In one of the submissions it was stated that considering the recent Wanneroo land sales as available on REIWA, a R40 land and 3-bedroom house package could cost $320-380,000, whereas a R20 land and 4-bedroom house package would cost around $425,000. Based on the lot area and the size of the house in both scenarios, the submitter believes that a R40 block is not affordable and therefore the proposal does not satisfy the objective of LPP3.1 to provide affordable housing.
One of the objectives of LPP3.1 is to address housing affordability within the City to provide a variety of housing stock. In the discussion paper on Planning Provisions for Affordable Housing released by the former Department of Planning in 2013, affordable housing was referred to individual dwellings that are sold or rented too low to moderate income household at a rate they can afford. The submitter has demonstrated that R40 land and house package is more affordable than R20 land and house package. Therefore the amendment proposal satisfies the objective of LPP3.1.
Additional Comments
Local Planning Policy 3.1- Local Housing Strategy Implementation (LPP3.1)
LPP3.1 provides the framework to guide the planning and development of increased housing density in the housing precincts that are identified in the policy. The policy also guides other infill development areas located outside those housing precincts. The amendment area is located outside of the Wanneroo Housing precinct as shown in Attachment 5. Therefore Section 9 in Part 2 of the policy relevant to Other Infill Development will apply.
Subsection 9.1 (b) of LPP3.1 states that where the land concerned is the subject of an approved structure plan under DPS2, the application for amendment of that Structure Plan must include an assessment of how the proposal:
i. Is appropriate within the broader planning framework provided by the Structure Plan;
ii. Satisfies the criteria in Table 3 of this Policy relating to infill development and increased density; and
iii. Supports the objectives and recommendations of the Local Housing Strategy.
The proposed amendment satisfies these criteria as follows:
i. The ASP 5 area is well established and comprises of predominantly single residential development at the R20 code with pockets of R40 coded land residential land north of Belgrade Road. The proposed R40 lots will not be out of character within the existing structure plan area, particularly given the proximity of the land to a local school (150 metres) and a high frequency bus route (within 200 metres). On this the proposal can be considered appropriate within the broader planning framework set out by ASP 5.
ii. The proposal satisfies Table 3 of the policy as demonstrated below.
Table 3 Criteria for other Infill Development and increased Density
|
No. |
Criterion |
Policy Application |
Comment |
|
1. |
Easy access/close proximity to Activity Centres |
R40 between 401 and 800 metres from an edge of Activity Centre excluding Local Centres. |
The subject land is approximately one kilometre from the edge of the Wanneroo Activity Town Centre. Therefore the proposal does not satisfy this criterion being greater than 800 metres from Wanneroo Activity Centre. |
|
2. |
Easy access/close proximity to public transport with priority towards rail nodes and bus interchanges. |
R60 within 250 metres of a high frequency bus route designated stops. High frequency bus route is defined as having a minimum of four services per hour during peak periods. |
The subject land is located between 200 and 400 metres from a bus route 467 designated stop as shown in Attachment 7.
|
In the report to Council to adopt the revised LPP 3.1 it was noted as follows in regard to the above two criteria (ref item PS10-04/16):
“The new criteria have been formulated to limit density increases to locations in close proximity to activity centres (with exception of local centres) or areas characterised by good access to public transport.”
The proposed amendment is therefore only required to satisfy one of the two criteria.
LPP3.1 does not define peak periods of the bus routes and therefore Administration has referred to the WAPC’s State Planning Policy 7.3 – Residential Design Codes (R-Codes) which defines peak periods as 7 to 9 a.m. and 5 to 7 p.m. Based on these peak periods, there are 11 and 9 bus services respectively on Scott Road.
LPP3.1 was based on the City’s Housing Strategy of 2005, which was based on the WAPC’s then draft LN policy version 3 which recommended 20-30 dwelling units per site hectare within 250 metres of main bus route.
The current LN policy makes provision for locating bus stops conveniently for the walkable catchment served at an average spacing of 300-400 metres (Element 2 – Requirement 26). The LN policy considers 400 metres as a walkable distance for daily needs. Therefore applying the provisions of the LN policy, the amendment area is considered to be within a walkable distance of 400 metres to the bus stop.
Although LPP 3.1 identifies higher density development may be appropriate within 250 metres of a high frequency bus route, regard should also be given to walkable catchment efficiency as outlined in Liveable Neighbourhoods (LN). LN considers that typically, most people will walk up to 400 metres for daily activities and up to 800 metres to a train station or town centre. The amendment area falls predominantly within a 400 metre catchment area of high frequency bus route 467 (designated stop on Scott Road) which demonstrates the land is in close proximity to public transport as required by Criterion 2.
iii. The objectives of LPP3.1 are as follows:
1. To address State government policy to increase housing density within the existing urban footprint of the metropolitan region and meet State Government infill housing targets;
2. To address housing affordability within the City by providing a variety of housing stock;
3. To better utilise existing infrastructure and amenities in existing suburbs by providing additional dwellings in close proximity; and
4. To promote higher density development in appropriate locations.
The proposed amendment supports the objectives of LPP3.1 as follows:
· It addresses the WAPC’s State Planning Policy 3 – Urban Growth and Settlement by proposing higher density development in areas accessible to transport and services
· The proposed R40 density addresses the housing affordability by providing a variety of housing stock;
· The proposed amendment would better utilise the existing infrastructure and amenities available in this locality; and
· As demonstrated in Table 3 above the amendment promotes R40 density in an appropriate location.
Bushfire Management Plan (BMP)
The applicant submitted a BMP prepared by a qualified consultant. Attachment 8 is the Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) contour map identifying a BAL rating of 12.5 over most of the site except for some of the site fronting High Road rated BAL29.
The BMP was referred to the Department of Fire Emergency Services (DFES) for comments. DFES advised that the BMP has adequately identified issues arising from the bushfire risk assessment and supported the BMP.
Proposed recoding
The amendment area is entirely zoned Residential and is proposed to remain Residential. The proposed recoding map provided by the applicant includes a road connecting High Road and Amos Road. ASP5 proposes a density on both side of a road reserve thus it does not code the road reserve. Accordingly the applicant has proposed to recode the land either side of the road only. Since the road land is zoned in DPS2, it is recommended that the entire amendment area be recoded R40 by deleting the road from the amendment plan. Detailed consideration of lot layout and road access will be considered at the subdivision stage. Administration has discussed this with the applicant who is supportive of this change.
Considering the above matters it is recommended that the proposed amendment be supported.
Statutory Compliance
This Structure Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS2 and the deemed Regulations.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations.
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
This proposal has been assessed under the provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 3.1: Local Housing Strategy Implementation, the WAPC’s State Planning Policy 3 – Urban Growth and Settlement, Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and State Planning Policy 7.3 – Residential Design Codes.
Financial Implications
Under the provisions of DPS2, at the time of either subdivision or development the applicant will be required make a developer contribution.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority.
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to subclause 20(2)(e) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 RECOMMENDS to the Western Australian Planning Commission that the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the East Wanneroo Cell 3 Approved Structure Plan No. 5 as contained in Attachment 2 to the report be approved WITH MODIFICATION to recode the entire amendment area as Residential R40 and to delete the road shown in the amendment plan;
2. Pursuant to subclause 20(2) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 PROVIDES a copy of the report on the proposed amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commission including the schedule of submissions and the City’s response and recommendations; and
3. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan |
18/451853 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Amendment No. 4 to ASP 5 - 71 High Road, Wanneroo |
18/451632 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Schedule of submissions and Administration s response |
19/440384 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Vegetation Condition |
18/451636 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Wanneroo Housing Precinct |
18/451646 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Bus routes |
20/5103 |
|
|
7⇩. |
Attachment 7 - Distance from the bus stop |
20/2490 |
|
|
8⇩. |
Attachment 8 - BAL contour map |
19/435996 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 151
File Ref: 5332-C2 – 20/16846
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider adoption of Amendment No. 2 to the Jindee Design Codes which forms part of the Jindee Agreed Structure Plan (ASP 84).
|
Applicant |
Roberts Day |
|
Owner |
Westminster Estates Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
2471 Marmion Avenue, Jindalee |
|
Site Area |
124 hectares (approximate) |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Smart Growth Community |
|
ASP 84 Zoning |
T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 Transects |
Background
Roberts Day, on behalf of Westminster Estates Pty Ltd, has submitted a proposed amendment to the Jindee ASP for the City’s consideration.
ASP 84 consists of three primary components including Part 1 Statutory Provisions, Schedule 1 Jindee Design Codes (JDC) and Part 2 Explanatory Report. This amendment relates specifically to the JDC which forms part of ASP 84.
Whilst the JDC forms part of ASP 84, sub-clause 3.25.9 of DPS 2 states that the WAPC is not required to consider, approve or administer the Transect Based Code component of ASP 84, being the JDC. Therefore, an amendment to the JDC is only required to be determined by the City.
Currently there is no delegation in place for the CEO to determine amendments to the JDC and therefore the proposal has been referred to Council for its determination. Administration is in the process of proposing changes to the delegations to ensure that reports relating to amendments to the JDC are not required to go to Council for determination in the future.
A location plan of the ASP 84 area is provided as Attachment 1.
Detail
The amendment proposes to modify the JDC by removing eight pedestrian access ways which are identified as ‘10C Passages’ under ASP 84.
Attachment 2 identifies the 10C Passages proposed to be removed as part of this amendment.
Attachment 3 contains the modified plans relevant to the amendment as submitted by the applicant.
Consultation
Clause 1.2 of the Design Approval Process contained within the JDC states that where an amendment to the JDC is minor it may be determined by the City without public advertising. Clause 1.3 outlines that for an amendment to be considered minor in nature, it shall be demonstrated that it:
a) Is confined to the JDC and does not impact on any other provision of the Part 1 Statutory Provisions of the LSP;
b) Does not have the potential to adversely impact on an adjoining landholding(s); and
c) Does not affect the interest(s) of any authority of body providing or likely to provide services within the LSP area.
In respect to a) above, Amendment No. 2 is confined to the JDC and does not impact on provisions contained in Part 1 of ASP 84. In respect to items b) and c) above, the modifications proposed by Amendment No. 2 relate to the removal of 10C Passages within areas where the lots have not yet been created, and therefore will not impact upon adjoining landholdings or affect the interests of any party that is likely to provide services within the ASP 84 area. Therefore, Amendment No. 2 is considered a minor amendment and public consultation is not required.
Comment
Objectives of the JDC Thoroughfare Standards
The primary objective of the JDC Thoroughfare Standards states:
· The thoroughfare network shall be highly connected for cyclists and pedestrians. Cyclists will be accommodated with shared paths or within the traffic lanes rather than separately designated on-road cycle lanes.
Passages are also defined in the JDC as pedestrian ways between buildings to provide shortcuts through long blocks, provide frontages for buildings with vehicular access by rear alleys and connect rear parking areas with street frontages.
Administration considers that the eight 10C Passages subject to the proposed deletion are not required given that the street blocks are short and highly walkable. These passages do not form part of any key linkages to a particular location or amenity. The remaining footpath networks as required under ASP 84 are sufficient in delivering a highly connected and walkable area. As such, Administration is of the view that the deletion of the eight 10C Passages will not compromise the ability for ASP 84 to meet the objectives of the JDC, and therefore, the proposed amendment is supported.
Statutory Compliance
This Amendment has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2 and ASP 84. Pursuant to Clause 3.25.9 of DPS 2, the WAPC is not required to consider or approve the JDC and therefore Council is required to determine proposed amendments to the JDC.
It is recommended that Amendment No. 2 to the JDC be supported without modifications.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.2 Connect walking and cycling opportunities to key destinations and distinctive places”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Administration’s assessment of the proposed amendment has been undertaken in accordance with DPS 2 and ASP 84.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 4.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 2 to the Jindee Design Codes as outlined in Attachment 3 is SATISFACTORY without modifications;
2. ACKNOWLEDGES Amendment No. 2 to the Jindee Design Code is a minor amendment and advertising for public comment is not required; and
3. APPROVES Amendment No. 2 to the Jindee Design Code and REQUESTS the applicant to update the Jindee Design Code accordingly.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Amendment No. 2 to Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/17463 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Proposed removal of 10C Passages - Amendment No. 2 to Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/17263 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Proposed amendment - Amendment No. 2 to Jindee Agreed Structre Plan No. 84 |
20/17276 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 164
PS10-02/20 Proposed change of use from Shop to Restricted Premises and associated signage - Lot 70 (964) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo (DA2019/1223)
File Ref: DA2019/1223 – 19/475361
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider a development application (DA2019/1223) for a change of use from a Shop to a Restricted Premises and the associated signage at Tenancy 1, Lot 70 (964) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo (subject site).
|
Applicant |
Exurban Rural & Regional Planning |
|
Owner |
Driveline Holdings Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Tenancy 1, Lot 70 (964) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo |
|
Site Area |
47.9m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Centre |
|
ASP 23 Zoning |
Commercial |
Background
On 15 October 2019, the City received a development application for a proposed change of use from a Shop to a Restricted Premises to operate as Adult Sinsations and the associated signage at the subject site. A location plan is included as Attachment 1.
The subject site is located at the south-eastern corner of Wanneroo Road and Dundebar Road and adjoins the Shell Service Station. There are three other tenancies adjoining the subject site within the same building.
Detail
The application as submitted seeks approval for the following:
Restricted Premises
· All front glass panels are to be fitted with semi-opaque PVC frosting to obscure any direct views into the premises;
· No window displays of any sort are proposed;
· The main entry to be screened internally to prohibit any views in and out of the premises when the front doors are opened; and
· The operating hours are 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. seven days a week.
Signage
Two Wall signs:
· Wall sign 1: 2.0 metres wide and 1.2 metres high facing Wanneroo Road to be fixed to the existing light box used by the previous shop tenant; and
· Wall sign 2: 2.4 metres wide and 1.1 metres high to be affixed to the building on the southern side facing the Shell Service Station; and
Three window signs not exceeding 50% of the glazed area of any one window or exceed 10m2 in aggregate of the total amount of glazing provided for Tenancy 1.
Attachment 2 contains the subject site plan and the proposed shopfront and the signage of the Restricted Premises.
In the District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2), Restricted Premises is defined as follows:
“Restricted Premises: means any premises used or designed to be used primarily for the sale by retail or wholesale, or the offer for hire, loan or exchange, or the exhibition, display or delivery of:
(a) publications that are classified as restricted publications pursuant to the Indecent Publications and Articles Act 1902 (as amended); or
(b) materials, compounds, preparations or articles which are used or intended to be used primarily on or in connection with any form of sexual behaviour or activities.”
The subject site is located within Wanneroo Town Centre. In the Wanneroo Town Centre Approved Structure Plan No.23 (ASP23) the subject site is zoned Commercial wherein the use class Restricted Premises is a discretionary (D) Use, a use not permitted unless the Council grants approval.
The applicant has justified the proposal as follows:
i) Adult Sinsations have been in business for approximately seventeen (17) years;
ii) Adult Sinsations is a very professional company and prides itself in the bright, clean stores it operates in the Perth metropolitan region and the fact it has done so without complaint by surrounding landowners or the relevant local government authorities (i.e. it has a proven track record of good, responsible management of restricted premises);
iii) All staff are highly trained and very knowledgeable and professional; and
iv) The company has been an active member of the Eros Association for many years (i.e. Australia's industry association for 'adults-only' retail, wholesale, media and entertainment) and follows their trade guidelines and code of conduct.
Adult Sinsations is currently operating at:
· 409 Great Eastern Highway in the City of Belmont in the Mixed Use zone;
· 6/1890 Beach Road, Malaga in the City of Swan in the Highway Service Zone; and
· 3/1440 Albany Highway, Cannington in the City of Canning in the Service Commercial zone.
Consultation
Advertising was undertaken for a period of 21 days from 31 October to 22 November 2019 by way of a notice placed in the Wanneroo Times and the City’s website, a sign erected on site and letters to the adjoining and affected owners and occupants. At the conclusion of the comment period 41 submissions were received. 29 submitters objected and 11 supported the proposal. One submission made a comment on the proposal. A summary of submissions and Administration’s responses is included in Attachment 3.
The main issues raised in the submissions objecting to the proposal are:
1. Impact on the other adjoining businesses (two submissions);
2. Locating elsewhere discreetly in Wangara (five submissions); and
3. Highly visible from schools and Church (13 submissions).
Some submitters made general statements objecting to the proposal without raising any issues. Others drew comparison with the tobacconist shop opposite to the subject site. One submitter suggested that the Restricted Premises be located within the vacant tenancy in the shopping centre.
Comment
The issues raised by the submitters are discussed below:
Impact on existing businesses
Some submitters raised concern regarding the impact of the proposed Restricted Premises on other businesses including the dental practice whose clients include families. AV Dental submitted an objection. However, the other two tenants did not make a submission.
In order to keep the Restricted Premises discreet, the applicant has proposed the shopfront as follows:
· Front glass panels fitted with semi-opaque PVC frosting to obscure any direct views into the store;
· No window displays of any sort; and
· The main entry to be screened internally to prohibit any views in and out of the premises when the front doors are opened.
In this regard it is considered appropriate to note the following matters relating to a similar application at Clarkson, which was considered by Council in 2016.
Council, at its Ordinary Meeting of 26 April 2016, considered a development application for a change of use from a Hairdresser to a Restricted Premises at Unit 3 1868 (Lot 782) Marmion Avenue, Clarkson and resolved to refuse the application (Item PS13-04/16):
The applicant sought a review of the decision by the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT). Following a mediation hearing the applicant submitted additional information. Council then reconsidered the matter at its meeting on 16 August 2016 and resolved to grant approval (Item CR03-08/16). The modified proposal deleted the window signage, product list on the shop front and removed lingerie based display which addressed Council’s concerns relating to the compatibility of the development within its setting and the impact of the development on the amenity of the locality. This Restricted Premises is operating and, to date, the City has not received any complaints.
It is noted that the Restricted Premises at Clarkson is flanked by fast food/take away tenancies on one side and retail and fast food/take away on the other side. It is considered that the proposed Restricted Premises is unlikely to detrimentally affect the adjoining businesses in this location.
Visibility of development to nearby Schools and Church
Several submitters are concerned that the Restricted Premises will be highly visible from the nearby schools and the Church and will be on the path to the schools. A private school is located at the north-western corner of Servite Terrace and Dundebar Road with the main entrance off Servite Terrace. A primary school is located on the western side of Wanneroo Road behind existing fast food/take away tenancies. The subject site does not front Dundebar Road and is located at the southern end of the building. Therefore it will not be visible from the main roadways into the school precinct.
Additional Comments
The proposal has been assessed under the provisions of the City’s Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre (LPP5.2) and the Draft Wanneroo Town Centre Activity Centre Plan No. 90 (draft ACP90)
LPP5.2 and draft AC90 state that notwithstanding the land use permissibility of the various zones of DPS2, the Restricted Premises is not a preferred use. Being a not preferred land use, however, does not mean it is a Not Permitted (X) use. It should be noted that a discretionary (D) use is a use not permitted unless the Council grants its approval. Therefore the application has been assessed as a discretionary use considering the relevant provisions of Clause 67 of the deemed provisions of DPS2.
Clause 67 (m) and (n) relate to the compatibility of development within the setting and the amenity of an area respectively as stated below:
“(m) The compatibility of the development with its setting including the relationship of the development to development on adjoining land or on other land in the locality including, but not limited to, the likely effect of the height, bulk, scale, orientation and appearance of the development.
(n) The amenity of the locality including the following –
(i) environmental impacts of the development;
(ii) the character of the locality;
(iii) social impacts of the development.
The following comments are made addressing the above provisions.
Clause 67(m) Compatibility of the development
In considering the Clarkson application, the applicant submitted information identifying the location of existing Restricted Premises in the Perth Metropolitan Area and their surrounding land uses to demonstrate that the Restricted Premises was compatible with the surrounding land uses. The information indicated that the Restricted Premises may be compatible with some of the existing uses adjoining the site. Administration also contacted other local governments who advised that although they received objections at the time of assessing a development application for a Restricted Premises, no complaints had been received from the operation of those Restricted Premises.
As noted above this Restricted Premises is located next to eateries frequented by families. Although there were objections received during the public consultation for the Clarkson development, the City, to date, has not received any complaints on its operation. The proposed Restricted Premises is similarly situated next door to businesses whose customers include families, however, is located away from the main shopping centre. The applicant has advised that the majority of their business is generated through customers visiting the store, and that 10 – 12 customers visit their existing stores each day. They anticipate the proposed development will attract a similar number of customers. Online sales will be processed through the business’ existing premises in Malaga and will not impact the operation of the proposed development. On this basis, it is considered that the proposed Restricted Premises can be compatible with the adjoining land uses.
Clause 67(n) Amenity of the Locality
One of the matters to be considered under Clause 67(n) is the appearance of the development. One of the objectives of the Commercial zone in draft ACP90 is to activate the street frontage. The applicant, however, does not propose to activate the street frontage but to keep the Restricted Premises discreet by blanking all windows so as to prohibit any views in and out of the premises. Considering the nature of this use it is considered appropriate to not require an open and activated street frontage. Attachment 2 provides window concept perspectives which illustrate how the tenancy frontage will look as viewed from the street.
Subclause 8.2.1 of DPS2 states that all land and building shall be used and maintained as to preserve the local amenity.
Under DPS2, the purpose of the Commercial Zone is to provide for shopping and commercial areas that provide for a wide range of uses, including retailing, entertainment, professional offices, business services and residential. DPS2, however, does not set out any requirements for a particular mix of uses, or for certain uses to be co-located or alternatively, separated from one another. Similarly, the perceived or actual business impact of a proposed use on the economic viability of other nearby land uses is not a planning consideration under the planning framework. Additionally, DPS2 does not include any locational criteria limiting the exposure or prominence of any land use in any zone.
The shopfront being proposed will have the glass panels fitted with semi-opaque PVC frosting to obscure any direct views into the store. There will be no window displays of any sort, and the main entry is to be screened internally to prohibit any views in and out of the premises when the front doors are opened. It is therefore considered that the proposed Restricted Premises will not affect the visual amenity of the area.
Development Standards of DPS2
As the application is proposing a change of use, the extent of physical works proposed is limited to the internal fitout of the tenancy and the erection of signage. The carrying out of building works which only affect the interior of a building are exempt from planning approval.
The proposed Change of Use does not require any additional parking bays as the DPS2 car parking requirements are the same for a Restricted Premises and a Shop.
Considering the above matters it is recommended that the proposed change of use from Shop to Restricted Premises at the subject site be approved.
Signage
The applicant has proposed two wall signs and three window signs which are discussed below with reference to the City’s Signs Local Planning Policy 4.6 (LPP4.6).
Wall Signs
In accordance with LPP4.6,
A Wall sign means a sign that is painted or affixed on the front, side or rear elevation of a building or structure but does not project more than 300mm out from the wall.
Wall signs shall:
· be limited to a maximum of one sign per tenancy, per street frontage;
· not extend laterally beyond either end of the wall or protrude above the top of the wall;
· not exceed 25% in aggregate area on any one wall to a maximum of 8m2; and
· be integrated with the building design.
The applicant has proposed two wall signs.
1. Wall sign-1 is proposed to be 2.0 metres wide and 1.2 metres high. This sign facing Wanneroo Road will be fixed to the existing box used by the previous business.
2. Wall sign-2 is proposed to be 2.4 metres wide and 1.1 metres high and is proposed to be fixed to the building facing the Shell Service Station.
The total area of the wall signs is 5.04m2.
LPP4.6 allows one wall sign per street frontage. While wall sign-1 facing Wanneroo Road satisfies this provision, wall sign-2 does not. The applicant contends that the other businesses in the complex have installed their wall signs facing the Shell Service Station. Records indicate that the other wall signs installed do not have approval and this is now being investigated by Compliance. Following discussions with Administration, the applicant has agreed to delete wall sign-2. It is recommended that wall sign-1 be approved.
Window Sign
A Window sign means a sign which is fixed either to the interior or exterior of the glazed area of a window, any part of which is visible from outside the building.
A Window sign shall not cover more than 50% of the glazed area of any one window or exceed 10m2 in aggregate per tenancy.
The proposed window signage includes,
· Product list on the shop front;
· The sign ‘R’ to indicate that the premises is restricted to those aged 18 years and above; and
· The hours of operation.
Following discussions with Administration the applicant has agreed to remove the product list from the shop front.
The other two proposed window signs do not exceed 50% of the window area and therefore they are supported.
Considering the above matters, the applicant has submitted the revised drawings included as Attachment 4.
Conclusion
The City has received a proposal for a change of use from Shop to Restricted Premises with associated signage at Tenancy 1 of Lot 70 (964) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo. Administration considers the discrete nature of the proposed development compatible with surrounding land uses and it will not detrimentally affect the amenity of the locality. The premises will be discreet through the installation of semi-opaque PVC frosting to the windows which will obscure any direct views into the store. There will be no window displays and the main entry will be screened internally to prohibit any views in and out of the premises when the front doors are opened. Administration does not consider there is any basis to refuse the application and therefore recommends it be approved subject to conditions.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 and the Draft Wanneroo Town Centre Activity Centre Plan No.90.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“2 Economy
2.1 Local Jobs
2.1.2 Build capacity for businesses to grow”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The City’s Local Planning Policy 5.2: Wanneroo Town Centre and Signs Local Planning Policy 4.6.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to clause 68(2)(a) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 GRANTS development approval for the proposed Change of Use from Shop to Restricted Premises and the associated signage at Tenancy 1 - Lot 70 (964) Wanneroo Road, Wanneroo as shown on Attachment 4 subject to the following conditions:
a) This approval only relates to the proposed Restricted Premises and the associated signage. It does not relate to any other development on the lot.
b) The use of the approved premises shall conform to the District Planning Scheme No. 2 definition of a “Restricted Premises” which states:
“Restricted Premises: means any premises used or designed to be used primarily for the sale by retail or wholesale, or the offer for hire, loan or exchange, or the exhibition, display or delivery of:
(a) publications that are classified as restricted publications pursuant to the Indecent Publications and Articles Act 1902 (as amended); or
(b) materials, compounds, preparations or articles which are used or intended to be used primarily on or in connection with any form of sexual behaviour or activities.”
c) Operating hours shall be between 9:30 am. to 5:30 pm. Monday to Sunday.
d) All signage is to be kept in accordance with the City’s Signs Local Planning Policy 4.6 and/or Signs Local Law (1999).
e) The applicant/owner shall ensure that all illuminated signage shall have an boxing or casing in which it is enclosed and constructed of incombustible materials, shall not comprise of flashing, pulsating, chasing or running lights and shall not have such intensity as to cause annoyance to the public or illuminate beyond the extent of the lot boundaries.
f) Deletion of the 2.4 metre x 1.1 metre wall sign proposed on the southern wall of the building as shown in Attachment 2 from the proposal.
2. ADVISES all submitters of this decision.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan |
19/515577 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Facade and Floor Plan of Tenancy 1 |
19/515588 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Schedule of submissions DA2019 1223 (modified) |
20/15604 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Final drawings for approval |
20/3640 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 179
PS11-02/20 Consideration of Development Application - Additions to Supermarket and Six Specialty Stores (Two Digital Wall Signs) - 131 Pinjar Road, Ashby
File Ref: DA2019/885 – 19/355299
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider a development application (DA2019/885) for two digital wall sign additions to an existing Supermarket and Six Specialty Stores at 131 Pinjar Road, Ashby (subject site).
|
Applicant |
Planning Solutions |
|
Owner |
Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Lot 8 (131) Pinjar Road, Ashby |
|
Site Area |
5090m2 |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Urban Development |
|
ASP 77 Zoning |
Commercial |
Background
On 24 July 2019 the City received a development application for the addition of two digital wall signs at the subject site.
The subject site is bound by Pinjar Road to the east, a Caltex Petrol Station to the south, the Ashby Bar and Bistro to the north and a vacant site to the west. The vacant site to the west has approval for a number of commercial tenancies, including an auto service centre. The subject site is zoned Urban Development under DPS 2 and Commercial under the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 77 (ASP 77).
A location plan is included as Attachment 1.
The subject site was originally approved for use as a Supermarket (Farmer Jack’s) and five commercial tenancies by the Joint Development Assessment Panel (JDAP) on 13 January 2017. The commercial tenancies are designed as small ‘speciality’ shops that can accommodate a range of retail uses and already include a nail salon, hairdresser, café and fish and chip shop. The subject site has also been subject to two minor amendments to the original approval, which included modifications to the façade and increasing the number of specialty tenancies from five to six.
Detail
The development application proposes two digital wall signs. As the signs do not include third party advertising they are considered to be additions to the existing approved commercial development and are not a defined land use under DPS 2. The details of the signs are as follows:
· The signs will be installed on the southern podium feature of the building;
· Sign 1 will face south towards the Caltex Petrol Station and Hollosy Way and is proposed to be 4.92 metres x 3.32 metres in size. The screen has a proposed surface area of 15.36m2;
· Sign 2 will face east towards both the car park and Pinjar Road and is proposed to be 6.2 metres x 3.32 metres in size. The screen has a proposed surface area of 19.46m2;
· The advertising content is proposed to only relate to tenants of the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre. Whilst the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre is made up of five separate lots all advertising content would relate to tenancies within the site and only comprise information such as business names and in-store offers. For this reason Administration does not consider the signage to be third party; and
· The screens will have a maximum brightness of 6000cd/m2 (cd/m2 represents ‘candela per square metre’ which is the standard unit of measurement for luminance) and a minimum dwell time of 40 seconds.
Following preliminary assessment, concerns were raised by Administration relating to traffic safety. As a result a Road Safety Assessment was submitted by the applicant on 15 October 2019 (updated report provided 20 December 2019).
A copy of the development plans is included as Attachment 2.
Consultation
Advertising of the proposal was undertaken by the City writing to landowners and occupiers within approximately 200 metres of the subject site and making available the development plans and supporting documentation on the City’s website. Advertising was undertaken for a period of 21 days, commencing on 16 August 2019 and concluding on 5 September 2019. One submission objecting to the proposal was received during the advertising period.
The following concerns were raised in the submission:
· The proposed signs are an unnecessary form of advertising; and
· The audience of the proposed signs are passing motorists which will lead to driver distraction.
The application was also referred to DPLH as the subject site abuts Pinjar Road, which is classified as an Other Regional Road under the MRS. DPLH advised they had no objection to the proposal subject to the following:
· The proposed advertisements should not interfere with sight-lines, distract drivers, or have the potential to hinder the interpretation of traffic signals or road signs.
The issues raised during the consultation period will be discussed in the ‘Comment’ section below.
Comment
Local Planning Policy 4.6: Signs
Local Planning Policy 4.6 (LPP 4.6) guides the assessment of advertising signage within the City, providing a set of Design Requirements and Objectives for the purpose of assessment. The Design Requirements contain both general development standards and standards specific to the type of signage proposed. When an application proposes to vary the Design Requirements it is assessed against the Objectives of LPP 4.6, whilst also having regard for the extent of the departure. It is noted that the Objectives of LPP 4.6 have been adopted from Part 5.1 of DPS 2 relating to the control of advertisements.
LPP 4.6 does not currently make reference to digital or illuminated signage. When the policy was last reviewed digital signage was not an advertising platform that had been introduced to the City or the wider Perth area. Administration is currently undertaking a review of LPP 4.6 which will include consideration on how to appropriately address digital advertising through the policy.
Notwithstanding this, the signs are still considered to meet the definition of a ‘Wall Sign’ under LPP 4.6 and have therefore been assessed against the Design Requirements specific to Wall Signs. Upon assessment it was determined that the proposed signs do not comply with the following provisions of LPP 4.6:
|
LPP 4.6 Standard |
Administration Comment |
|
Be limited to a maximum of one Wall Sign per tenancy, per street frontage. |
The subject site already includes numerous wall signs as shown in the site photos contained within Attachment 3. This includes two Farmer Jack’s signs on the southern podium feature, a 30m2 Farmer Jack’s sign in proximity to Sign 2 (facing Pinjar Road), a Coffee House sign and blank signage panel on the facade of the building, also facing Pinjar Road. |
|
Not exceed 25% in aggregate area on any one wall to a maximum of 8m2. |
Sign 1: The wall area is approximately 24m2 and the sign 16.33m2, which is approximately 68% of the total area of the wall. Sign 2: The wall area is approximately 29m2 and the sign 20.6m2 in area, which is approximately 71% of the total area of the wall. As such, the signs exceed the Wall Sign provisions with respect to both aggregate and maximum area allowable. |
|
Be integrated with the building design, particularly through the provision of signage panels. |
The signs are proposed to be installed on the podium tower which is a prominent feature of the subject site. Digital signage on the façade of the podium is not consistent with the built form outcome envisaged for the building and does not integrate with the approved design. |
Following identification of the above policy departures the proposal was considered against the Objectives of LPP 4.6. Administration has concluded that the signs do not satisfy a number of the policy objectives, each of which are outlined and discussed below:
1. To ensure that the visual quality and character of particular localities and transport corridors is not eroded.
The signs are considered to be inconsistent with the existing built form due not only to the scale but the digital nature of the signs. Illuminated digital signs are significantly more prominent than a typical static sign. The podium tower currently contributes to a good design outcome for the area, providing articulation and architectural feature to the building and making both the subject site and Ashby Neighbourhood Centre easily identifiable from the public realm. Additionally, the surrounding areas of Ashby, Tapping and Sinagra consist primarily of low density residential development which makes large scale digital signage inconsistent with the established character of the locality, particularly at night time due to the luminance of the signs. Installing digital signage on this feature is considered to have a negative visual impact on both the quality and character of the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre and surrounding locality.
2. To achieve advertising signs that are not misleading or dangerous to vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
Issues relating to traffic safety are discussed in the ‘Traffic’ section below.
3. To minimise the total area and impact of outdoor advertising commensurate with the realistic needs of commerce for such advertising.
As previously discussed, the façade of the building already accommodates a sufficient amount of signage for current and future tenants, which is in addition to a nine metre high pylon sign in proximity to Pinjar Road (see Attachment 3). Additional advertising signs on the façade of the building is inconsistent with this Objective and instead would create an unnecessary proliferation of advertising. This is heightened by the signs digital nature and ability to change content at regular intervals, which will detract from both the existing signage on the subject site and the overall built form. The proposed signs will excessively prioritise commercial considerations over the visual amenity of the area.
4. To prohibit outdoor advertising which is considered to be superfluous or unnecessary by virtue of their number, colours, height, prominence, visual impact, size, content and relevance to the premises on which they are located.
As noted above, Sign 1 is 16.33m2 and Sign 2 is 20.6m2, which accounts for 68% and 71% of the surface area of the respective walls. Whilst this significantly exceeds the maximum size permitted under LPP 4.6, it is also the cumulative impact of size, height and prominence in combination with the distinctive positioning on the podium feature of the building that makes the proposal inconsistent with this Objective. With all these factors considered it is Administration’s view that the proposal will result in an unnecessary and excessive amount of advertising which will detrimentally impact on the character of the surrounding area.
5. To reduce and minimise clutter.
The departure from this objective has been addressed under Points 3 and 4 above.
In considering the above issues Administration considers that this proposal does not satisfy the Design Requirements or Objectives of LPP 4.6, the Objectives of Part 5.1 of DPS 2 and as a consequence Clause 67 of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2, specifically clauses (m) and (n) relating to the compatibility of the development within its setting and impacts on the amenity and character of the locality.
Traffic
The proposed signs will be visible from the surrounding road network which includes the intersection of Pinjar Road/Caporn Street/Hollosy Way. As noted above Pinjar Road is classified as an Other Regional Road under the MRS, with the latest available traffic data indicating that daily vehicle volumes in this location currently exceed 15 000 per day. As the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre and surrounding East Wanneroo area continues to develop vehicle volumes along Pinjar Road are anticipated to increase significantly, as an important linkage between Wanneroo Road and Flynn Drive.
Whilst DPLH advised they do not object to the proposal, their submission stated that the signs should not interfere with sight-lines, distract drivers, or have the potential to hinder the interpretation of traffic signals or road signs. To investigate this further the City’s Traffic Services have reviewed the proposal with regard for the surrounding context and Main Roads’ Policy and Application Guidelines for Advertising Signs within and Beyond State Road Reserves (Main Roads’ policy). The Road Safety Assessment (RSA) provided by the applicant also assessed the proposal against the provisions of Main Roads’ policy, which is adopted for the assessment of digital signage as such signs have a heightened potential of creating a traffic safety issue.
Notwithstanding the proposed signs meet the setback requirements from Pinjar Road as specified under Main Roads’ policy Administration maintains serious safety concerns due to the proximity of the signs to the intersection of Pinjar Road/Caporn Street/Hollosy Way. This intersection is listed as a ‘blackspot’ location with 22 recorded crashes in the past five years, which was not addressed in the applicants RSA.
Administrations concerns relate to the visibility of the signs when approaching and navigating this intersection from numerous directions, all of which have been illustrated for contextual purposes in Attachment 3. Firstly, there is a direct line of site to Sign 1 (facing Hollosy Way) when approaching the roundabout northbound on Pinjar Road, which may result in drivers seeking to view the content whilst approaching the roundabout. The view to this sign is partly obscured by the existing Caltex fuel canopy, which heightens the risk to motorists as they may seek to interpret the obscured content whilst navigating the roundabout. Similarly, motorists approaching the roundabout from Caporn Street will have partial visibility of both signs, also resulting in drivers attempting to view the content whilst navigating the roundabout. Lastly, motorists approaching the roundabout southbound on Pinjar Road will have partial visibility of Sign 2 which is likely to take a drivers attention away from the road at a critical decision making point.
Administration is therefore of the view that both signs have the potential to increase driver distraction at a known blackspot intersection. As a consequence the signage fails to satisfy Section 3.1 of Main Roads’ policy relating to general safety as the signs could distract drivers at a critical time and are located in an area already subject to several existing devices, with the cumulative effect of these devices considered potentially hazardous.
In summary, introducing an additional distraction to drivers at a blackspot intersection, where instead the emphasis should be on traffic safety, is considered to unnecessarily compromise the safety of motorists and therefore fails to satisfy Main Roads’ policy. Additionally, the proposal is also considered to be inconsistent with Objective 2 of LPP 4.6 and Clause 67 (r) of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2, which requires the City to have due regard to the suitability of the development when taking into account possible risk to human safety.
Conclusion
In light of the above, the application for Additions to Supermarket and Six Specialty Stores (Two Digital Wall Signs) at 131 Pinjar Road, Ashby does not satisfy the Design Requirements or Objectives of LPP 4.6 and DPS 2 relating to advertising signs, creating a proliferation of signage on the façade of the development and negatively impacting the overall built form. Additionally, the signage is considered to present an additional distraction to drivers in proximity to a blackspot intersection, posing an avoidable safety risk to motorists. Administration acknowledges the increasing presence of digital signage throughout Perth as a new advertising platform, however the use of such signage in suburban settings as a tool to generate passing trade is considered inappropriate, and therefore the application should be refused.
Statutory Compliance
This application has been assessed in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s DPS 2 and LPP 4.6.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.3 Enhance distinctive built form and spaces based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O23 Safety of Community |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability & Director Assets |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate and Strategic risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 68(2)(c) of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 REFUSES to grant development approval for the proposed Addition of Two Digital Wall Signs to a Supermarket and Six Specialty Stores at 131 Pinjar Road, Ashby submitted by Planning Solutions on behalf of Endeavour Properties Pty Ltd for the following reasons:
a) The proposal does not comply with Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Local Planning Policy 4.6: Signs, Part 5.1 of DPS 2 Control of Advertisements or Clauses 67 (m), (n) and (r) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 with regard for the following:
i. the signs are considered superfluous and unnecessary due to their size, height, prominence and visual impact on the subject site, contributing to visual clutter on the façade of the building and detracting from the appearance of the existing built form;
ii. the signs are likely to compromise the safety of road users as they may distract drivers at the intersection of Pinjar Road/Caporn Street/Hollosy Way which is identified as a blackspot intersection;
iii. the proposal is not commensurate with the realistic needs of commercial advertising on the site; and
iv. the signs will detract from the amenity of the surrounding locality as the size, digital format and visibility of the signage is inconsistent with the predominantly low density residential character of the area.
b) The proposed signage does not satisfy the general safety criteria of Main Roads’ Policy and Application Guideline for Advertising Signs as it unnecessarily introduces an additional distraction to drivers at a critical decision making time which is potentially hazardous.
2. Advises submitters of its decision.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1: Location Plan |
19/383316 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2: Development Plans |
19/383325 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3: Site Photos |
19/383414 |
|
Land Development
File Ref: 4116 – 19/506095
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider Draft Amended Local Planning Policy (LPP) 4.7 – Uniform Fencing.
Background
The Draft Amended LPP 4.7 – Uniform Fencing (included as Attachment 1) provides guidance on uniform fencing and what is required to be provided by developers and landowners where land directly abuts the public domain (e.g. Schools, Public Open Space (POS), Drainage Reserves, Pedestrian Access Ways (PAWs), Railway Reservations, Regional Roads, any other Category of Road with a ‘Neighbourhood Connector A’ or higher road classification, or any other public place). The resident is responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of a uniform fence. The City undertakes graffiti removal and ensures anti-graffiti coating is applied on the side of the uniform fence facing the public domain.
A ‘dividing fence’ is a fence that separates the lands of different owners whether the fence is on the common boundary of adjoining lands or on a line other than the common boundary. An ‘owner’, in relation to land, does not include any trustees or other persons in whom land is vested as a public reserve, public park or for such other public purposes as may be prescribed, or a person who has the care, control and management of a public reserve, public park or land used for such other public purposes as may be prescribed. Uniform fencing is therefore not considered to be a dividing fence and does not include any associated retaining walls.
The requirement for the construction of uniform fencing is triggered through the development and/ or subdivision of land and is imposed as a standard condition of approval.
The City’s Fencing Local Law 2016 makes no reference to ‘Uniform Fencing’; however, reference is made to ‘Estate Fencing’ which relates to an estate entry statement or an estate boundary fence. The City’s Fencing Local Law 2016 is currently under review and it is proposed to include uniform fencing provisions to strengthen the relationship between the Local Law and this policy.
Detail
Current Scenario
The current LPP (included as Attachment 2) allows for uniform fencing to be constructed of timber, super six (cement sheets painted and capped), brick or masonry, or other approved materials up to a maximum height of 2.1 metres. Timber or super six was commonly used pre-2000s and was used in many estates in City of Wanneroo’s older suburbs. James Hardie Industries ceased production of super six cement sheeting in March 2019, however, some product may still be held in reserve by certain suppliers. Timber fencing and super six sheeting has a shorter lifespan compared to brick or masonry materials. There are many examples where such materials were used for uniform fencing and have become dilapidated and visually unappealing due to age, vandalism, lack of ongoing maintenance or replaced with inconsistent materials by the resident. This detracts from creating a ‘sense of place’ and reduces streetscape amenity. Refer to photographs included at Attachment 3.
There is currently no compliance mechanism within the City’s Fencing Local Law 2016 relating to uniform fencing; however, the current LPP states that uniform fencing is to be repaired or replaced with similar materials from which it was originally constructed.
Proposed Scenario
The amended LPP includes reference to new City of Wanneroo Uniform Fencing Standards (included as Attachment 4) which proposes to restrict uniform fencing to reconstituted stone blocks, masonry, brick materials or other durable materials approved by the City. Refer to photographs in Attachment 3 for supported and unsupported uniform fencing materials. This new restriction will not apply to uniform fencing approved or constructed prior to the adoption of this policy and will be subject to a grandfather clause. The City will use historical aerial imaging to determine what uniform fencing material was in place at the time of adoption of this policy. For example, in instances where super six cement sheeting is being replaced, the City will consider the use of Colorbond® as a suitable alternative replacement material. Similarly, timber fencing would need to be replaced with timber materials. The City would also be supportive of property owners choosing to replace super six, timber and Colorbond® uniform fencing with reconstituted stone blocks, masonry, brick materials or other approved durable materials. Existing residents will be subject to the City’s Fencing Local Law and the amended LPP provisions (Sections 6.2 and 6.3.) which require uniform fences to be repaired or replaced with similar materials from which it was originally constructed.
Masonry and brick materials have many benefits for the City and future residents as they provide:
· Better noise attenuation;
· Longer asset life;
· Reduced maintenance requirements;
· Less susceptible to damage and vandalism;
· Reduced cost to residents;
· Improved streetscape amenity; and
· A sense of place.
It is proposed to allow Uniform Fencing to have a maximum height of 2.4 metres and is consistent with maximum height specified in Section 4.7.2 of Development Control Policy 2.2 – Residential Subdivision (Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), 2017).
Where the WAPC has imposed the condition for uniform fencing and landscaping on a subdivision approval, the City shall require the developer to submit a landscaping plan together with the uniform fencing plans. The landscaping plan will include any details of any financial contribution to the City, or where the developer implements the landscape works, agrees to establish and maintain the landscaping works for a minimum period of two years. The amended LPP will require complementary landscaping in front of uniform fencing to provide screening, achieve improved streetscape and urban forest outcomes and soften the visual impact.
To address the current gaps in uniform fencing compliance (e.g. enforcing repair, maintenance and replacement by the resident) it is proposed to include uniform fencing in the City’s Fencing Local Law 2016, which is currently under review.
The proposed changes will have minimal impact on the development industry as most developers use reconstituted stone blocks, masonry or brick for their uniform fencing. This is evident in the new estates throughout the City’s north-west corridor and across the Perth Metropolitan Area.
The Draft Amended LPP 4.7 – Uniform Fencing has been amended to include the following key changes/updates:
· References to new or updated policies and guidelines relating to uniform fencing;
· Clear policy objectives covering matters such as minimising the need for uniform fencing, enhancing local character and adding to ‘sense of place’;
· Clear definitions and interpretations;
· Subdivision design requirements for road reserves, public open space and school sites, pedestrian access ways and drainage reserves;
· Construction using Colorbond® Steel (or similar), ring-lock/cyclone, super-six/ fibro cement (painted and capped) and twin side post and panel will no longer be approved materials. Uniform fencing shall be constructed of reconstituted limestone blocks, brick, masonry or other durable materials approved by the City;
· Complementary landscaping requirement;
· Policy implementation; and
· Maintenance of uniform fencing.
Consultation
The City undertook initial consultation with the Urban Development Institute of Australia (WA) Infrastructure Committee on the 19th September 2019. The only comment made by the UDIA committee members was in relation to noise walls and whether consideration was given to State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Noise. This has been addressed in the new City of Wanneroo Uniform Fencing Standards (included as Attachment 4). No other concerns or comments were raised.
Clause 4(2) of the deemed provisions of the City District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) requires a draft LPP to be advertised for a minimum of 21 days. However, typically the City advertises policies of this nature for 42 days to allow sufficient time for comment to be made. It is recommended that the Policy be advertised for 42 days in the following manner:
1. An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
2. Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
3. Letters to relevant State Government agencies and other relevant stakeholders as determined by Administration.
Following public consultation, the final amended LPP 4.7 will be presented to Council for final adoption.
Comment
LPP 4.7 will ensure uniform fencing that abuts the public realm is of a suitable standard and amenity. The proposed approach to uniform fencing has numerous benefits including better noise attenuation and improved streetscape amenity. The improved asset performance will also reduce costs for residents due to the longer lifespan of the fencing materials proposed for uniform fencing.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clauses 4 and 5 of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes contained within Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (DPS2 Deemed Provisions), Council can resolve to amend a local planning policy. Draft amendments to a policy, which are not minor, must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days; after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceed with the policy.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.3 Enhance distinctive built form and spaces based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O18 Inherited Assets |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Through LPP 4.7, the City is committed to ensuring that land subdividers and developers provide uniform fencing of a suitable standard and amenity.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with the preparation and advertising of LPP 4.7 can be managed within the Planning & Sustainability Directorate operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clauses 4 and 5 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, PREPARES the amended Local Planning Policy 4.7: Uniform Fencing, as contained in Attachment 1, and ADVERTISES it for public comment for a period of at least 42 days by way of:
a) An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
b) Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
c) Letters to relevant State Government agencies and other relevant stakeholders as determined by Director Planning & Sustainability.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Amended Local Planning Policy 4.7 - Uniform Fencing |
19/290401 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Local Planning Policy 4.7 - Uniform Fencing - Subdivision |
19/290418 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Presentation - Examples of Uniform Fencing and Associated Matters |
19/315331 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - City of Wanneroo Uniform Fencing Standards |
19/322776 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 216
File Ref: 38655 – 19/506284
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider Draft Amended Local Planning Policy (LPP) 4.5 – Subdivisional Retaining Walls.
Background
The Draft Amended LPP 4.5 – Subdivisional Retaining Walls (included as Attachment 1) provides clear guidance on the appropriateness of different retaining wall heights under various circumstances and subject to certain conditions. This guidance aims to minimise the extent of retaining walls that are visible from public spaces such as road reserves and public open space and promotes the retention of soil within the proposed lots and along rear and side boundaries, where the retaining walls will ultimately be screened by the future construction of a dwelling. LPP 4.5 currently proposes ‘acceptable’ heights up to 1.5-meters for all retaining walls abutting public spaces and abutting land in different ownership and up to 3.0-meters along rear and side boundaries within the same subdivision area. A list of ‘Performance Criteria’ currently addresses those issues relevant to subdivisional retaining walls that exceed the ‘acceptable’ heights.
The LPP has been effectively applied to subdivisions within the City and no substantial amendments are proposed.
Detail
Current Scenario
The current LPP (included as Attachment 2) is effective and provides clear guidance on the appropriateness of different retaining wall heights under various circumstances and subject to certain conditions. The current policy does not consider what materials are acceptable for retaining wall construction or road orientation to minimise retaining wall visibility from the public realm. This detracts from creating a ‘sense of place’ and reduces streetscape amenity. Refer to photographs included at Attachment 3, which identifies supported and unsupported retaining wall materials and road orientation.
Proposed Scenario
The Draft Amended LPP proposes to restrict retaining wall construction materials to concrete, brick or stone or other durable materials approved by the City. Twin-side (panel and post) will be restricted to areas where tree and vegetation retention can be better achieved through minimised soil disturbance and lateral clearance, however it’s use is generally not supported due to weed growth and possible migration of sand and water though twin side panels. Timber, metal and cement sheeting are not supported for structural and durability reasons. Besser block may be supported where it is hidden from view behind the built form (e.g. as applied in the split level lots of The Amble Estate, Girrawheen). Besser blocks will not be supported where they are visible from the public realm or adjacent properties. Refer to photographs included at Attachment 3, which identifies supported and unsupported retaining wall materials.
The proposed changes will have minimal impact on the development industry as most developers use reconstituted stone blocks for their subdivisional retaining walls. This is evident in the new estates throughout the City’s north-west corridor and across the Perth Metropolitan Area.
The Draft Amended LPP 4.5 – Subdivisional Retaining Walls has been amended to include the following key change/updates:
· References to new or updated policies and guidelines relating to subdivisional retaining walls;
· Clear policy objectives covering matters such as minimising the need for subdivisional retaining walls, enhancing local character and adding to ‘sense of place’;
· Clear definitions and interpretations;
· Subdivisional retaining walls are to be constructed using concrete, brick or stone or other durable materials approved by the City. Twin-side (panel and post) will be supported where tree and vegetation retention can be better achieved through minimised soil disturbance and lateral clearance. Timber, metal and cement sheeting are not acceptable materials. Besser blocks will not be supported where they are visible from the public realm or adjacent properties.
· Complementary landscaping requirement;
· Policy implementation; and
· Maintenance of subdivisional retaining walls.
This Draft Policy will not be changing the Council endorsed maximum wall heights due to their acceptance by the land development industry and appropriateness of the visual amenity outcomes achieved in new subdivisions.
Consultation
The City undertook initial consultation with the Urban Development Institute of Australia (WA) Infrastructure Committee on the 19 September 2019. Comments were raised in relation to twin-side (panel and post) and how it may be beneficial where lateral clearance and minimised soil disturbance is required for tree or vegetation retention. The implications of road orientation to restrict retaining wall visibility from the road reserve was also raised by the committee as this can lead to residential lots having finished levels below the road surface. This can have implications for servicing (e.g. sewerage and drainage). The issue of split level lots was also raised by the Infrastructure Committee due to concerns relating to marketability and building challenges. No other concerns or comments were raised.
Clause 4(2) of the deemed provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) requires a draft LPP to be advertised for a minimum of 21 days. However, typically the City advertises policies of this nature for 42 days to allow sufficient time for comment to be made. It is recommended that the Policy be advertised for 42 days in the following manner:
1. An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
2. Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
3. Letters to relevant State Government agencies and other relevant stakeholders as determined by Administration.
Following public consultation, the final amended LPP 4.5 will be presented to Council for final adoption.
Comment
LPP 4.5 will ensure subdivisional retaining walls are of a suitable standard and amenity. The proposed approach to subdivisional retaining walls has numerous benefits including minimised height and improved streetscape amenity. The improved asset performance will also reduce costs for residents due to the longer lifespan of the materials proposed for subdivisional retaining walls.
Statutory Compliance
In accordance with Clauses 4 and 5 of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes contained within Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (DPS2 Deemed Provisions), Council can resolve to amend a local planning policy. Draft amendments to a policy, which are not minor, must be advertised for public comment for a period of not less than 21 days; after which time it is to be reviewed in the context of any submissions received and either adopted with or without modifications or not proceed with the policy..
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.3 Enhance distinctive built form and spaces based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O18 Inherited Assets |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
manage |
The above risk/s relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Through LPP 4.5, the City is committed to ensuring that land subdividers and developers provide subdivisional retaining walls of a suitable standard and amenity.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with the preparation and advertising of LPP 4.5 can be managed within the Planning & Sustainability Directorate operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clauses 4 and 5 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, PREPARES the amended Local Planning Policy 4.5: Subdivisional Retaining Walls, as contained in Attachment 1, and ADVERTISES it for public comment for a period of at least 42 days by way of:
a) An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
b) Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
c) Letters to relevant State Government agencies and other relevant stakeholders as determined by Administration.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Amended Local Planning Policy 4.5 - Subdivisional Retaining Walls |
19/337602 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Local Planning Policy 4.5 - Subdivisional Retaining Walls |
19/337606 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Presentation - Examples of Subdivisional Retaining Walls and Associated Matters |
19/337614 |
|
Assets
File Ref: 34175 – 19/501507
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider Tender No. 19275 for the construction of Hartman Drive Duplication from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road.
Background
As part of the City’s ongoing commitment to upgrade its major road network, the construction of a second carriageway on Hartman Drive from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road was considered by Council at its meeting on 12 November 2019, Item No AS02-11/19 refers, and approved the inclusion of grant funding for this project for the purpose of undertaking construction in the City’s 2019/2020 Capital Works Budget under PR-3018.
The existing section of Hartman Drive between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road is approximately 2km in length. This section is a single carriageway road with a single 3.5m traffic lane and 1.5m cycle lane in each direction as well as a 2.5m shared path on the eastern side of Hartman Drive.
The scope of the project includes the provision of pedestrian and cycle infrastructure to the City’s standards, upgrading of drainage and street lighting in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1158 and landscaping reinstatements.
Completion of the proposed works in the section of Hartman Drive between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road will result in:
· Two 3.5m traffic lanes in each direction;
· 2.5m shared paths on both sides of the road;
· A raised central median for the entire length of this section of Hartman Drive, except for turning traffic where Hartman Drive connects with side roads and minor accesses; and
· Left and right turn lanes into the side roads and central median refuge space at all existing ‘T’ intersections.
Detail
Tender No. 19275 for the Construction of Hartman Drive Duplication was advertised on Saturday 7 December 2019, and closed at 3pm on Tuesday 16 January 2020. A public information session for the community was held at Kingsway Sporting Complex on the 27 November 2019 along with a non-mandatory briefing tenderers held at the City of Wanneroo on 18 December 2019.
Essential details of the proposed contract are as follows:
|
Contract Form |
Major Works |
|
Contract Type |
Fixed lump Sum Price |
|
Contract Duration |
30 Weeks |
|
Commencement Date (Subject to Tender Award) |
Late February 2020 |
|
Date of Practical Completion |
August 2020 |
|
Defects Liability Period |
12 months |
|
Extension Permitted |
N/A |
|
Rise and Fall |
No |
Tender submissions were received from the following companies:
· Tracc Civil Pty Ltd (“Tracc Civil”)
· Ralmana Pty Ltd T/A RJ Vincent and Co (“RJ Vincent)
· Remote Civils Australia (“RCA”)
Tender Evaluation Panel
The Panel comprised of:
· Project Manager Infrastructure Projects
· A/Coordinator Safety Systems
· Project Manager Infrastructure Capital Works
· Maintenance Engineer
· Project Officer Infrastructure Capital Works
Probity Oversight
Oversight to the tender assessment process was undertaken by the City’s Contract Officer and William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd provided external probity services.
Tender submissions were evaluated in accordance to the Procurement and Evaluation Plan (PEP) which included the following selection criteria:
|
|
Criteria |
Weighting |
|
1 |
Environmental Considerations (mandatory weighting) |
5% |
|
2 |
Buy Local (mandatory weighting) |
5% |
|
3 |
Experience – Organisational/Key Personnel |
20% |
|
4 |
Project Management Methodology |
30% |
|
5 |
Organisational Capacity and Resources |
20% |
|
6 |
Safety and Quality Management |
20% |
Price was not included in the Qualitative Criteria but was considered as part of the overall value for money assessment and the minimum acceptable baseline for Qualitative Criteria was set at 60%.
On initial review of the tender submissions by the Tender Evaluation Panel, it was confirmed that all tender submissions were deemed to be conforming tenders.
Pricing for the works offered
Based on the tendered prices as submitted, tenderers were ranked as below:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Evaluation Criteria 1 – Environmental Considerations (5%)
The City is committed to procuring goods and services that have the most positive environmental, social and economic impacts over the entire life cycle of a product or service. Tenderers are encouraged to provide the credentials of any environmental claims of the goods and/or services being submitted in this Tender.
Based on Schedule 3A as submitted, tenderers were ranked as below:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Evaluation Criteria 2 – Buy Local (5%)
Buy local commitment to the City of Wanneroo
The City encourages the development of competitive local businesses within the geographical boundaries of the City first and secondly within the broader region. This commitment includes, but is not limited to:
· Purchasing locally made and sourced goods / services;
· Inviting local businesses to participate in quotation, tender and expressions of interest opportunities;
· Providing an advantage to businesses based within the City’s boundaries;
· Providing an advantage to businesses which can demonstrate economic benefit to the City’s community such as employing local residents/sub-contractors and/or purchasing goods/services from local providers.
Based on Schedule 3B as submitted, tenderers were ranked as below:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
2 |
Evaluation Criteria 3 – Experience – Organisational/Key Personnel (30%)
The tenderer’s relevant experience in demonstrating the achievement of the City’s expectations as presented in their tender submissions were assessed in order to evaluate their capability and credentials to meet the requirements of the contract.
Based on the response provided by the tenderers the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Evaluation Criteria 4 - Tenderer’s Project Management Methodology (30%)
The tenderer’s project management procedures and project methodology, as presented in their tender submissions, were assessed in order to evaluate the tenderer’s understanding, methods and construction programme to meet the relevant timeframe of the contract.
Based on the response provided by the tenderers, the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Evaluation Criteria 5 - Capacity and Resources (20%)
The tenderer’s resources as presented in its tender submissions were assessed in order to evaluate their capacity to meet the requirements of the contract. Assessment of this criterion considered the tenderer’s staff resources, vehicles, plant/equipment and workshop support to manage the contract.
Based on the response provided by the tenderers the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
Tracc Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Evaluation Criteria 6 - Safety and Quality Management (20%)
Evidence of safety and quality management policies and practices was assessed from the tender submissions. The assessment for safety management was based on the tenderers responses to an Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included within the tender documentation.
Based on the response provided by the tenderers the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
RCA |
2 |
|
Tracc Civil |
3 |
Tendered Price Assessment and Ranking
Refer to Confidential Attachment 1 for tenderers details and lump sum prices.
Overall Qualitative Weighted Assessment and Ranking
Tender submissions were reviewed in accordance with the PEP with the following key observations:
· The tenderers bids were evaluated in accordance with the selection criteria and were assessed as having the necessary resources, previous experience, capability, safety and quality management systems to undertake the tender.
· The baseline for qualitative criteria was set at 60%
The overall qualitative weighted assessment resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
RJ Vincent |
1 |
|
TRACC Civil |
2 |
|
RCA |
3 |
Value for Money Assessment
The tender submission from RJ Vincent achieved the highest ranking and satisfied the overall value for money assessment in accordance with the assessment criteria and weightings as detailed in the Procurement and Evaluation Plan and is therefore recommended as the successful tenderer.
An assessment and evaluation of RJ Vincent also noted the following:
· Ranked high in all assessments;
· Tender clarifications were examined in relation to direct financial implications to Lump Sum Price and were considered minimal;
· A reputable and large organisation with substantial backing;
· RJ Vincent has performed large projects for the City and for a range of clients including Main Roads WA, Public Transport Authority, LandCorp, Developers and other Local Governments;
· Examples of projects undertaken by RJ Vincent include construction of major urban and rural roads including intersections, as well as subdivision developments;
· RJ Vincent tender price is competitively priced and represents value for money; and
· Previous work undertaken relating to timelines of completion of projects, project management, quality of work and overall delivery of projects is considered positive.
Consultation
In accordance with Section 3.51 of the LG Act, relating to the level and alignment changes, property owners/occupiers located within the area deemed to be impacted by the proposed works were notified during November/December 2019, and submissions requested on the proposed alteration to Hartman Drive. No submissions were received.
At the public information session was held on 27 November 2019, the feedback was positive and where possible, addressed in the scope of works. It was advised that an arborist will be engaged to assess all trees that lie within the construction area with a view to retain as many as possible.
Businesses adjacent to Hartman Drive were also engaged to discuss the design and the construction staging.
A detailed communication plan will be implemented covering project signage, an ongoing commitment to provide regular progress reports on key project milestones or events; posting of information on City’s webpage and media channels in addition liaising with the residents groups to inform them of the construction programme.
Comment
The tender submission from RJ Vincent achieved the highest overall ranked score in accordance with the assessment criteria and weightings as detailed in the Procurement and Tender Evaluation Plan. It is therefore recommended to accept the submission from RJ Vincent for Tender No. 19275 for the Construction of Hartman Drive Duplication from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road.
Statutory Compliance
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.57 of the Local Government Act 1995. The tendering procedures and evaluation complied with the requirements of Part 4 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
The City’s defined risk appetite for this objective states that connectedness is key to building strong communities and the City acknowledges that development and improvement of local transport infrastructure and improved accessibility initiatives requires appropriate planning, due diligence, consultation, funding and focusing on communication and consultation to achieve desired outcomes. Therefore, the City will accept moderate reputational risk when undertaking improvements to enhance accessibility for the community.
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability and Director Assets |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S24 Strategic Asset Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Assets |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-017 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage/mitigate/accept these risks to support existing management systems.
Information pertaining to this tender is contained within this report together with the City’s defined Risk appetite against the relevant strategic objective for Council’s consideration
Financial and Performance Risk
Financial Risk
An advanced financial risk assessment report was done based on the June 2019 financials by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd advised that RJ Vincent has been assessed with an acceptable financial capacity to meet the requirements of the contract. No additional risk mitigation actions are required outside of the need for a contractor to provide as per the tender documents.
As per tender requirements, RJ Vincent is required to provide two bank guarantees/retention with a combined total of 5% of the contract value, for practical completion, defects and liability period, within 14 days after acceptance of tender or five days prior to possession of site, whichever is the latest.
Performance Risk
RJ Vincent has successfully completed a number of major road duplications for the City of Wanneroo - Connolly Drive, Neerabup Road, Mirrabooka Avenue, Lenore Road and Marmion Avenue. RJ Vincent constructed the 1.2km section of Marmion Avenue adjacent to Alkimos Vista which was completed in April 2019, completed the Pinjar Road duplication in late 2019 and is currently undertaking the Marmion Avenue duplication (Camborne Parkway to Yanchep Beach Road). RJ Vincent has recently commenced the Connolly Drive Duplication in Butler.
RJ Vincent has demonstrated an appreciation of the City’s requirements in all of the above projects.
RJ Vincent does not foresee any upcoming works impacting the delivery of its current projects, as such RJ Vincent shall work to ensure that resources in the area provide contingency for unforeseen breakdowns or any shortfalls in emergency supervision or management services.
Independent reference checks from prior projects have also indicated that the recommended tenderer has provided good service and delivery to its customers, including the projects mentioned above for the City.
Operational Risk
Operational risk and mitigation will be addressed through the risk assessment process of the project management framework.
Prior to the commencement of works, the appointed contractor will be inducted to the project site. Ongoing auditing of the contractor’s work practices during the course of the works will be undertaken to ensure compliance with the OHS requirements.
Social and Environmental (Sustainable Procurement) Considerations
RJV provided a number of responses to the Social and Environmental Considerations under Schedule 3A and 3B of the tender.
RJV informed that it will be implementing an Access and Inclusion Plan (AIP) to maintain pedestrian access at all times, ensuring that the deviations from the current paths are wheelchair, mobility scooter, and vision impairment friendly. When works require the use of active traffic management, the traffic controllers will be in place to assist members of the community when crossing roads and locations within the vicinity of the works area.
Broader Economic Impact Implications for the City of Wanneroo
RJ Vincent has advised that:
“RJ Vincent employs locally based sub-contractors and purchases locally based materials. RJ Vincent is committed to backing local business and maximising opportunities to create jobs and stimulate the economy to deliver growth. The Buy Local Policy they initiated supports Western Australia metropolitan and regional business through a number of measures to enhance supply opportunities.
The personnel base has been developed through the continued growth of RJV as a business over the last 15 years’ worth of project growth in the north-west metro corridor and has enabled RJV to provide job stability and support to these personnel that their long-term employment in work regions close to their family and communities is secure.
With current contracts at:
· Eden Beach and Brighton, Butler
· Shorehaven Estate, Alkimos
· East of the Beach, Eglinton
· Amberton Estate, Alkimos
· Jindowie Estate, Yanchep
· Yanchep Golf Course Estate, Yanchep
· Marmion Avenue Duplication, Alkimos Vista
RJ Vincent ensures that projects in the Wanneroo area are a focus of RJ Vincent’s business plan and sees the benefit of this focus repaid in the loyalty and commitment of the workforce in these communities. RJ Vincent also enjoys the benefit of extensive support from local businesses that operate out of the City of Wanneroo, from road material suppliers, to fencers, local hardware stores, fuel distributors and even local cafes. As part of RJ Vincent’s ongoing growth as a company RJ Vincent has also recently acquired Reilly Contractors and incorporates them as part of the RJ Vincent Group. With a large contingent of personnel living and working in Wanneroo, the Reilly Contractors division increases RJ Vincent’s importance as a key industry employer in the north-west coastal corridor.”
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Purchasing Policy as applicable at the time of advertising the tenders.
Financial Implications
The table below summarises the available funding for the project, current expenditures, the recommended tender price by RJV for the construction of Hartman Drive Duplication and associated expenses:
|
PR-3018 Hartman Drive Duplication (Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road) |
||
|
Description |
Expenditure |
Budget |
|
Budget: |
|
|
|
Proposed Capital Works Budget for 2018/19 (PR-3018) |
|
$200,000.00 |
|
Proposed Capital Works Budget for 2019/20 (PR-3018) |
|
$2,400,000.00 |
|
Proposed Capital Works Budget for 2020/21 (PR-3018) listed |
|
$2,100,000.00 |
|
Total |
|
$4,700,000.00 |
|
Expenditure |
|
|
|
Expenditure incurred in 2018/19 |
$169,135.49 |
|
|
Expenditure incurred in 2019/20 |
$49,148.59 |
|
|
Commitments |
$28,880.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tender Offer - based on RJ Vincent offer |
$3,358,988.73 |
|
|
Western Power Charges (estimated – subject to a formal quote) |
$600,000.00 |
|
|
Project Management and Administration Fees |
$50,000.00 |
|
|
Landscaping Reinstatements |
$150,000.00 |
|
|
Water and Telecommunications |
$74,712.19 |
|
|
Contingency |
$219,135.00 |
|
|
Total Expenditure |
$4,700,000.00 |
|
The MRRG grant funding allocation of $3,000,000 has been approved for the duplication of Hartman Drive, with $950,000 to be funded from East Wanneroo Cell 6 DCP and the remaining $750,000 by Municipal funds. Sufficient funds are available within the project budget to fully undertake these construction works. A further project financial review will be undertaken when the works are substantially advanced, and any identified budget adjustments will be listed for Council’s consideration as part of the 2020/2021 budget review.
A minor funding source amendment to recognise the DCP funding will be necessary to accurately reflect the funding sources to match the projected expenditure items during 2019/2020, and will be reported to Council for consideration/approval as part of the Monthly Financial Activity Statement report in the coming months.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. That Council ACCEPTS Tender No 19275 submitted by Ralmana Pty Ltd t/as RJ Vincent, for the Construction of Hartman Drive Duplication from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road, Kingsway for the fixed lump sum price of $3,358,988.73 in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the tender document; and
2. LISTS $2,100,000 funding in the Draft 2020/2021 Capital Works Program to enable the completion of Hartman Drive Duplication works.
Attachments:
|
1. |
Confidential Attachment 1 - Report Attachment Tender 19275 |
Confidential |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Hartman Drive Duplication from Hepburn Avenue to Gnangara Road - Location Map |
20/33936 |
|
Attachment 1 - Report Attachment Tender 19275
Tender No 19275 - Hartman Drive Duplication between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road
This attachment is confidential and distributed under a separate cover to all Elected Members.
Administration Use Only:
Attachment 1 – HPE# 20/25761
Assets Maintenance
AS02-02/20 Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group Terms of Reference Amendments
File Ref: 14888 – 20/19990
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider the amendments to the City’s Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group’s Terms of Reference.
Background
The Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group was established by Council at its Ordinary Meeting in March 2014, Item No. IN08-03/14 refers. The Group meets quarterly or at major project milestones and has been critical in gaining community views and support throughout the development and construction of the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management measures which were implemented over three stages from 2017/18 to 2019/20. The City intends to continue the Group until 2020/21 to enable ongoing community consultation throughout the next phase of the Quinns Beach Coastal Management project which will involve major maintenance of the southern groyne adjacent to Fred Stubbs Park.
As part of the City’s annual Policy and Procedure reviews, Administration identified inconsistencies in the City’s Committee and Advisory/Working Group Terms of Reference (ToR) template, which required updating. The template was updated and standardised by Administration to be accurate and better reflect current practices requiring an update of the ToR.
As a result of this, the ToR for the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group has been amended for Councils consideration.
Detail
The following changes have been made to the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group’s ToR for Council’s consideration:
· Standardised template; and
· Name change from ‘Community Reference Group’ to ‘Advisory Group’ to better reflect the Group’s definition and functions.
Refer to Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 for the current and proposed amended Terms of Reference.
The amendments do not change the role, purpose or membership of the Group and will not impact on how the Group functions for the remainder of its existence.
The amended ToR were discussed and agreed at the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group Meeting on 16 September 2019.
Consultation
The City is committed to ongoing consultation with the Quinns Rocks Community on all coastal matters, specifically implementation of coastal protection measures relating to the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management Project.
The continuation of the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group will assist with community consultation during the remaining construction phases of the project by providing a conduit to disseminate information to and obtain feedback from the wider community.
With regards to the ToR amendments, relevant stakeholders have been consulted to identify the amendments required to conform to the City’s standardised ToR template.
Comment
It is recommended that Council approves the administrative changes to the ToR of the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Reference Group.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.2 Engage, include and involve community”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S06 Climate Change |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-022 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage/mitigate/accept this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council APPROVES by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the amended Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection Community Advisory Group Terms of Reference as per Attachment 3.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Community Reference Group - Terms of Reference - Nov 2017 |
17/377234 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Advisory Group - Amended Terms of Reference - Oct 2019 - Including Administration Comments |
20/33613 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Quinns Beach Coastal Protection Advisory Group - Amended Terms of Reference - Oct 2019 |
19/301263 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 253
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection – Community Reference Group
November 2017
|
Name: |
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection – Community Reference Group |
||
|
Role/Purpose: |
To have input into the development and implementation of long term coastal protection measures for the Quinns Rocks coastline. |
||
|
Aims & Functions: |
· To receive information at the key stages of the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management Project. · To provide input in to the development and implementation of long term coastal protection measures for the Quinns Rocks coastline. · To present community views to the Group.
|
||
|
Membership: |
2.1 The Group shall consist of the following representation: · The Mayor · North Coast Ward Elected Members or their delegates; · Director Assets; · Manager Assets Maintenance; · Project Manager – Coastal Projects; · Representative from the Department of Transport; · A maximum of six representatives from the community/community groups. 2.2 The community representatives shall be: · the residents or property owners within proximity from the Quinns Beach car park off Ocean Drive; · able to demonstrate an understanding of this significant project and willing to contribute; · able to demonstrate their community network through local community organisations.
2.3 Membership shall be for a period of up to two years terminating on the day of the Ordinary Council elections, with retiring members eligible to apply. 2.4 Group membership shall be appointed or removed by the Director Assets. 2.5 Members must comply with the City’s Code of Conduct. 2.6 The Group has authority to second individuals from outside of the group, on a voluntary basis, for their expert advice.
|
||
|
Operating procedures: |
3.1 Chairperson: a) The members of a Group are to elect a Chairperson and deputy Chairperson from amongst themselves at the first meeting of the Group and in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995, Schedule 2.3, Division 1. (For transparency and accountability it is recommended that Council officers not be appointed to the position of Chairperson and deputy Chairperson.) b) The CEO or delegated nominee will attend the first meeting to conduct the election of the Chairperson or at a subsequent meeting if a new Chairperson is to be elected. c) The Chairperson will preside at all meetings. d) In the absence of the Chairperson, the Deputy Chairperson will assume the chair, and in his absence, a person is to be elected by the Group members present to assume the Chair. e) The Chairperson is responsible for the proper conduct of the Group.
3.2 Meetings: a) The Group shall meet on a quarterly basis as a minimum. b) All meeting dates are to be provided in Councillors Clipboard and in the City of Wanneroo diary. c) A Notice of Meetings including an agenda will be circulated to the Group members (including deputy delegates) at least 72 hours prior to each meeting where possible. d) The Chairperson shall ensure that detailed minutes of all meetings are kept and shall, not later than five business days after each meeting, provide the Group members (including delegates) with a copy of such minutes. The minutes are to be available for public inspection. e) Copies of all minutes are to be forwarded electronically, through HPE Record Management System, the City’s electronic record keeping system, to Governance for filing in the elected members’ reading room. f) All agenda and minute documentation to be generated through Council’s Infocouncil software reporting system. g) The Group outcome or recommendation will have effect if it is supported by general consensus of the meeting or through vote made by the simple majority. A Simple majority is the agreement of not less than half of the votes present at the meeting. h) In the event that a vote is taken, all endorsed members (or delegates attending in lieu of the endorsed Elected Members) of the Group will have one vote. The Chairperson will have the casting vote and simple majority will prevail. 3.3 Quorum: The quorum for a meeting shall be at least 50% of the number of endorsed members. 3.4 Administration: 3.4.1 Administration Support Administration support for the group will be provided by the City of Wanneroo. That support person will be the Director Assets’ Personal Assistant or her delegate as appointed from time to time. 3.4.2 Items for Discussion: A Group member may request for an item for consideration at a meeting which is relevant to the purpose of the group. Such requests shall be made in writing to the Director Assets 7 days prior to the compilation of the Agenda for that meeting. |
||
|
Delegated Authority: |
4.1 The Group has no delegated power and has no authority to implement any agreed actions other than the dissemination of information to the Community. 4.2 The Group has no delegated authority to commit Council to the expenditure of monies. 4.3 Matters requiring Council consideration will be subject to separate specific reports to Council. |
|
|
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection – Advisory Group
October 2019
|
Name: |
Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Protection – Advisory Group
|
||
|
Role/Purpose: |
To have input into the development and implementation of long term coastal protection measures for the Quinns Rocks coastline.
|
||
|
Definition: |
Advisory Group: The role of an Advisory Group is to act in an Advisory capacity, providing the City’s Administration and the Council with its views and/or proposals relevant to the objectives for which the group was established. It is put together to get opinions and make Recommendations and/ or provide key information and materials to the Council, usually of a strategic nature. It may be ongoing (standing) or ad hoc (one-time) in nature. In operation, the Advisory Group cannot direct City Employees, expend monies, direct Volunteers or do anything, which is the responsibility of the City.
|
||
|
Aims & Functions: |
The Advisory Group needs to understand the scope and limitations of the task and responsibilities delegated to it. It needs to know definitely what is expected of it and appreciate its aims and function in relation to the body’s whole operation.
Responsibilities need to be defined as to both scope and limitations and needs to state what the specific requirement of the Advisory Group is, e.g. to make a Recommendation; or to come to a decision and then initiate an action; or some other specific objective.
1.1 To receive information at the key stages of the Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management Project. 1.2 To provide input in to the development and implementation of long term coastal protection measures for the Quinns Rocks coastline. 1.3 To present community views to the Group.
|
||
|
Membership: |
2.1 The Advisory Group shall consist of the following representation: o The Mayor; o North Coast Ward Elected Members or their delegates; o Director Assets; o Manager Assets Maintenance; o Specialist Coastal Engineer; o Representative from the Department of Transport; o A maximum of six representatives from the community/community groups.
2.2 Community representatives are to be approved by the appropriate Director and shall be: o the residents or property owners within proximity from the Quinns Beach car park off Ocean Drive; o able to demonstrate an understanding of this significant project and willing to contribute; o able to demonstrate their community network through local community organisations.
2.3 Membership shall be for a period of up to two years terminating on the day of the Ordinary Council Elections, with retiring members eligible to apply.
2.4 Members must comply with the City’s Code of Conduct.
2.5 The Advisory Group have authority to second individuals from outside of the Advisory Group, on a voluntary basis, for their expert advice. o Consideration will not be given to any nomination received from a person who is currently serving as an Elected Member of a neighbouring Council.
|
||
|
Operating procedures: |
3.1 Chairperson: a) The members of an Advisory Group are to elect a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson from amongst themselves at the first meeting of the Group. (For transparency and accountability it is recommended that City Officer’s not be appointed to the position of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson.) b) The Chairperson will preside at all meetings. c) In the absence of the Chairperson, the Deputy Chairperson will assume the Chair, and in their absence, a person is to be elected by the Advisory Group present to assume the Chair. d) The Chairperson is responsible for the proper conduct of the Advisory Group.
3.2 Meetings: a) The Advisory Group shall meet on a quarterly basis. b) All meeting dates are to be provided in the Elected Members Diary in the ‘Wanneroo Wrap’ and in the City’s Corporate Calendar. c) A Notice of Meetings including an Agenda to be circulated to the Group members (including Deputy Delegates) at least 72 hours prior to each meeting where possible. d) The Chairperson shall ensure that detailed Minutes of all meetings are kept and that copies are made available to all Group members (including Deputy Delegates) as soon as practicable after the meeting. The Minutes are to be available for public inspection. e) Copies of all Minutes are to be forwarded electronically, through HPE Content Manager (the City’s electronic record keeping system), to Council Support for filing in the Elected Members’ Reading Room, and a copy placed on the Elected Members Hub Portal. f) All Agenda and Minute documentation to be generated through Council’s InfoCouncil software reporting system. g) A Group Recommendation does not have effect, unless it has been made by simple majority. A simple majority is the agreement of not less than half of the votes present at the meeting. h) All endorsed members (or the proxy or Deputy Delegate attending in lieu of the Elected Member) of the Group will have one vote. The Chairperson will have the casting vote and simple majority will prevail.
3.3 Quorum: A meeting can be conducted without a quorum if necessary. However, every endeavour should be made to achieve a quorum (50% of voting Delegates) or at least to ensure a reasonable spread of representation in the Group. Particularly in circumstances where Recommendations will be made for Councils consideration.
3.4 Administration: 3.4.1 Advisory Group Administrator Support An Advisory Group Administrator for the Group will be provided by the City of Wanneroo. That support person will be Director Assets’ Personal Assistant or their delegate.
3.4.2 Motions on Notice A Group member may raise at a meeting any business that the member considers appropriate and which is relevant to the purpose of the Committee, in the form of a Motion, of which seven days notice has been given in writing to the Group Administrator prior to the compilation of the Agenda for that meeting.
An Administration Comment is to be added at the end of Motions on Notice and signed off by the appropriate Director.
|
||
|
Delegated Authority: |
4.1 The Advisory Group has no delegated power and has no authority to implement its recommendations without approval of Council. 4.2 The Advisory Group has no delegated authority to commit Council to the expenditure of monies. 4.3 Matters requiring Council consideration will be subject to separate specific reports to Council.
|
|
|
Community & Place
File Ref: 34228V02 – 20/6580
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 7
Previous Items: CP02-03/19 - Progress Report - North Coast Aquatic and Recreation Facility Needs and Feasibility Assessment - Ordinary Council - 05 Mar 2019 7.00pm
CP06-04/19 - PT01-03/19 - Support for Early Provision of an Aquatic Facility - Ordinary Council - 09 Apr 2019 7.00pm
Issue
To consider the draft North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study (the Study).
Background
The commencement of the Study was as a result of Council’s consideration of a Motion on Notice at its meeting held on 6 February 2018 (MN01-02/18), in which Council resolved the following:
1. APPROVES the inclusion an Indoor Aquatic and Recreation Centre development for the Alkimos/Yanchep corridor in the City’s Advocacy Strategy, with a view to bringing forward the proposed timeframe from 2042-2046, as currently listed in the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor Community Facilities Plan (2011);
2. APPROVES the Mayor to write to relevant State and Federal Government Ministers to highlight the need and seek support (including funding support) for:
a) The early provision of an Indoor Aquatic and Recreation Centre in the Alkimos/Yanchep corridor; and
b) Undertaking investigation of opportunities for the City to work with the education sector (and potentially other parties) to facilitate shared use of aquatic facilities planned for the northern coastal growth corridor in the future.
Subsequent to this resolution, an action was included in the 2018/19 Corporate Business Plan (CBP) to “undertake a needs and feasibility assessment in relation to a recreational aquatic facility within the Alkimos/ Yanchep growth corridor (this will include a cost benefit impact on the City’s Aquamotion facility)”.
As a result, the scope of the Study was developed in two parts as outlined below:
Regional Aquatic and Recreation Facility in the Alkimos / Yanchep Corridor
1. To confirm the need and feasibility for the early provision of the proposed Regional Aquatic and Recreation facility (the Facility) in the Alkimos/ Yanchep corridor (current delivery timeframe of 2042 – 2046);
2. Confirm location and staging options, taking into consideration the early delivery of an outdoor 50m pool and required supporting infrastructure;
3. Development of concept site plans, facility layout plans and elevations, based on proposed site option and staging approach informed by the revised functional brief (based on that provided within the CFP);
4. Provision of a capital cost plan for the delivery of the facility and a whole of life cost plan;
5. Prepare a detailed Business Plan for the proposed facility including income and expenditure projections over a 10 year period, market analysis, service and programming analysis, marketing and promotions strategy, organisational structure, staffing levels etc.; and
6. Review of project delivery and management options (in-house versus external management), taking into consideration joint provision opportunities and key stakeholder requirements.
Wanneroo Aquamotion
1. Confirm the cost/benefit impact of the proposed future provision of the Regional Aquatic and Recreation facility in the Alkimos / Yanchep Corridor on the City’s existing Aquamotion facility;
2. Identify future location assessment criteria and location options for a facility to replace (i) Aquamotion as a stand-alone (ii) Aquamotion and the Kingsway Indoor Stadium as a joint facility (based on a 20 year horizon). This is to be based on the recent State Government East Wanneroo Metropolitan Regional Scheme (MRS) amendment; and
3. Develop an indicative functional brief, construction cost plan, operating cost plan and whole of asset life plan and illustrative concepts for the proposed new facility. This should also consider the provision of appropriate “dry side” programming space, including but not limited to gymnasium/group fitness, multi-purpose activity and meeting room pace and indoor sports halls.
Administration appointed SGL Consulting Group (SGL) in December 2018 via a Request for Quotation process to undertake the Study.
Since consideration of the initial Motion on Notice, Council has considered two reports related to the Study, as per the following:
· CP02-03/19 Progress Report – North Coast Aquatic and Recreation Facility Needs and Feasibility Assessment;
· CP06-04/19 PT01-03/19 – Support of Early Provision of an Aquatic Facility.
Detail
The draft North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study Report (the Report) has been provided in three parts, as outlined below:
· Needs Assessment Report Attachment 1;
· Feasibility Study and Business Plan Attachment 2;
· Order of Concept Cost Estimate Attachment 3.
The methodology employed for the Study included four phases, as outlined below:
|
Phase |
Key Tasks |
|
Phase 1: Project Inception |
· Project Inception Meeting; and · Council Officer Interviews. |
|
Phase 2: Needs Assessment |
· Document Review; · Population/ Participation Analysis; · Leisure Facility Trends; · Benchmarking; and · Progress Report. |
|
Phase 3: Feasibility Assessment |
· Stakeholder Engagement; · Demand Assessment; · Design Brief; · Site Analysis and Criteria; · Site Investigations; · Concept Plan and Cost Estimates; and · Presentation. |
|
Phase 4: Business Plan |
· Draft Business Plan; · Wanneroo Aquamotion; · Presentation; and · Council Forum. |
Needs Assessment Report
The full Needs Assessment Report has been included as Attachment 1, with the key findings as a result of the Needs Assessment being as per the following.
Ten sports halls have been identified in the broader region, with nine of those being south of Burns Beach Road.
The report notes that there are two major activity nodes are planned in the NCGC. Yanchep Strategic Metropolitan Centre (retail, office, community, entertainment, residential, employment activities, and public transport) and the Alkimos Secondary Centre including ‘Alkimos Central’, civic buildings, offices, medical facilities, entertainment, education, residential, public open space and public transport.
There are more than 20 schools within the NCGC, with more than 41 proposed and potential locations for future school developments. Three high schools have been identified for Alkimos and Eglinton and eight high schools in Yanchep/ Two Rocks. The need to provide access to aquatic and recreation facilities for these future students is evident.
The report noted the development of the freeway and railway within the NCGC, with railway stations planned for Butler, Alkimos, Eglinton, Yanchep Beach Road and Yanchep. The Mitchell Freeway is planned to be extended along the eastern boundary of the NCGC to Two Rocks.
Trends
The report identifies several design components which are considered to be central to contemporary facility design. These include, but are not limited to:
· Flexible water spaces;
· A mix of water depths (shallow leisure/recreation water with deeper programmable water space);
· Splash pads with play features;
· Access for all water spaces through beach entry and access ramps;
· Complementary revenue generating activity spaces;
· Ancillary services and complementary businesses;
· Mechanical devices to change water configuration (depth and pool length);
· A mix of indoor swimming pools and outdoor areas;
· Energy efficient plant and equipment and water saving features.
Key trends that have been identified as potentially impacting the viability of facilities include aging populations, 24/7 availability, demand for variety of options, creation of a destination (rather than just an aquatic and recreation facility), changing employment structures, and demand for high quality, affordability and universal access.
The report identified six distinct aquatic market segments, including:
· Lap swimming;
· Swim coaching/squads;
· Learn to swim lessons;
· Recreational aquatic play;
· Aquatic fitness;
· Therapeutic and rehabilitation.
There are also several “best practice learnings” outlined in the report, including design recommendations, pool locations and potential revenue streams. Key to this are aspects such as development of multiple pools to allow for different water depth and temperatures to cater for different markets, provision of play features ranging from toddlers to teens and development of 50m pools with movable booms to allow reconfiguration of water space.
With the population growth as previously outlined, it is projected that the minimum annual attendance at a well-designed and managed indoor aquatic centre will be at least 90,000 based on the 2016 population. This is expected to grow to approximately 250,000 and 410,000 in 2028 and 2041 respectively. The report indicates that there is sufficient current demand for an aquatic facility and by 2041 there will be sufficient demand for a regional facility with possibly a smaller facility.
The report indicates that the immediate priority, in respect to an aquatic facility, should be the provision of an indoor facility, providing water space of at least 25m in length and heated to at least 29 degrees to service the existing swimming lesson demand.
While there is an anticipated demand for fitness and sports estimating such demand is more difficult, as it is common for customers to travel distances to participate. The population and participation assessment suggests demand in the NCGC currently exists for four sports courts, with demand escalating in the future.
Feasibility Study and Business Plan
The full Feasibility Study and Business Plan have been included as Attachment 2, with the key findings being as per the following.
Concept Design
50m Pool Considerations
The report advises that “an aquatic centre should be developed to meet the priority aquatic markets, sized to meet current and future demand, flexible to meet current and evolving design and usage trends”.
In addition, the report indicates that “a specific issue which has been raised is the option to develop a 50m pool to meet current demand. This option is not recommended for the following reasons:
· The current population and demand projections do not justify a 50m pool, though this may change in the future;
· Aquatic facilities which offer a variety of water temperatures, and water depths will be needed. These can only be provided in multiple pools;
· All activities which require a 50m pool can be undertaken in a 25m pool;
· The major reason a 50m pool is developed is to conduct elite swimming training, and major swimming competitions. In practice, elite swim squads are likely to be located at Joondalup Arena as it has a larger catchment than a pool in NCGC. It is unlikely that major swim meets will be attracted to NCGC on a regular basis;
· It is preferable for aquatic education programs to be offered on a year round basis. Hence heated water is needed. For aquatic education, water should be about 30oC. This temperature is more easily achieved in an indoor pool, however the capital cost and ongoing operating costs will be high; and
· A major disadvantage of an outdoor heated pool, which operates year round, is that customers have to “brave the elements” between the change rooms and pools. This can be a significant disincentive to visit the pool during periods of rain and high winds. In practical terms, it will be difficult to maintain aquatic education attendances during the colder months.”
Furthermore, the report indicates that current projected attendances are not sufficient to justify the development of a 50m indoor pool, with smaller water bodies to accommodate activities such as swimming lessons and water exercise required. The report also notes that to meet the requirements of the different markets, a range of water temperatures and depths are required.
Notwithstanding the above, the report has considered the development of a stand-alone 50m outdoor pool. The concept for this pool has been included within Attachment 4.
The initial assessment of this option has found that the outdoor nature of a pool of this type will discourage winter use, in particular swimming lessons, as evidenced by data collected from the Scarborough Beach pool, which indicates that term based swimming lesson participation reduces from 500 children in Terms 1 and 4 to approximately 50 in Terms 2 and 3. The report found that while an indoor pool can expect approximately 90,000 visits per year, during the winter months an outdoor pool can only expect approximately 15% attendance. This would drop the anticipated attendance to around 58,500 per year.
Design Rationale and Staging
The design rationale for the facility is based on the existing regional aquatic and recreation facility currently listed in the Northern Growth Corridor Community Facilities Plan (as noted within the initial Motion on Notice and the scope of the study).
On this basis and taking into consideration the key findings of the Needs Assessment Report (Attachment 1) and Feasibility Study and Business Plan Attachment 2, the design rationale for the proposed facility and subsequent staging is summarised as follows, being outlined in more detail in Section 3.2 of Attachment 2:
|
Description |
Rationale |
Market |
|
||
|
Stage 1 |
|
|
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · 25m x six lane program pool · Depth 1.0m – 1.6m, temperature 29oC – 31oC · Ramp access
|
Initially a multipurpose pool will become the main teaching pool when the 10 lane lap pool is constructed.
Current demand is insufficient to justify a larger water area. Given the young age profile of the NCGC, aquatic education will be a high priority market. Developing a 25m pool will enable lap and squad swimming to be undertaken. |
Lap swimming recreational play aquatic fitness swimming lessons swim coaching |
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · Young children’s leisure pool · Depth beach entry – 1m, temperature 29oC – 31oC |
It is expected this will be heavily used by families with young children and for aquatic education. |
Recreational play swimming lessons |
|
||
|
Recreation Facilities · Four court sports hall · Min 78.05m x 36.15 plus spectator seating on three tiers of fixed seating (0.8m wide) on two end walls. · Courts to be divided by heavy duty net curtains.
|
NCGC population will support demand for a four court sports hall in the near future. The initial demand will be for community indoor sports programs and competitions. |
Courts suitable for basketball, netball, futsal and other major court sports |
|
||
|
Stage 2 |
|
|
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · Splash pad 150m2 |
As the population and hence demand increases additional recreation water will be needed to cater for demand for families with young children. |
Recreational play |
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · Warm water program pool · 15x x 10m, depth 1.2m, temperature 34oC |
As the population and hence demand increases specialist water space will be needed to meet the needs of older people and people needing rehabilitation. |
Water therapy aquatic fitness Swimming lessons |
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · Spa pool (40m2) |
As the population and hence demand increases additional water space to cater for adult relaxation may be required |
Recreational play |
|
||
|
Stage 3 |
|
|
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · Leisure pool · 400m2, beach entry to 1.5m, temperature, 29oC – 31oC |
As the population and hence demand increases additional water space to cater for upper primary school children’s play |
Recreational play water exercise swimming lessons |
|
||
|
Aquatic Facilities · 25m x 10 lane lap and training pool · Depth 1.5m – 1.8m, temperature 26oC – 28oC · Option to extend to 50m pool |
As the population and hence demand increases additional water space to cater for stroke correction, swim squads, swim club training, lap swimming and competitions. |
Lap swimming recreational play water exercise swimming lessons swim coaching |
|
||
|
Recreation Facilities · Show court with retractable seating which can be configures as a four court venue · Min 78.05m x 36.15 plus spectator seating on three tiers of fixed seating (0.8m wide) on two end walls. · Retractable seating · Courts to be divided by heavy duty net curtains. |
As the population grows and indoor sports’ participation increases, demand for more community sports courts and high level competition venues will increase. |
Major sports competitions and events |
|
||
|
To be determined |
|
|
|||
|
· Crèche · For up to 30 children (30 x 3.25m2 + 10m2 for amenities = 107.5m2) with access to fenced outdoor play space (30 x 7m2 = 210m2) |
Construction of a crèche will be dependent upon the demographic profile of customers. A large proportion of caregivers with young children will suggest that a crèche is required. |
Customers with very young children. |
|||
|
Stage 4 |
|
|
|||
|
Complementary facilities: § Health and fitness suite (600m2) § Sauna and steam room(2 x 12m2) § Multipurpose function, activity and meeting spaces(400m2) |
Further market research will be required to assess demand for additional facilities.
The health and fitness market has undergone significant changes in recent years. It has resulted in the proliferation of low fee, small gyms offering 24/7 access or specialised programs. The NCGC already has a significant number of health and fitness facilities, which is expected to grow with the population. Demand for full service health and fitness facilities is difficult to project, and given the volatile nature of the industry, long term planning is highly speculative. Space should be allocated to a health and fitness suite, but details of what it is to include and financial operating projections are unlikely to be accurate. |
||||
The concepts in support of the above design brief and staging have been included in Attachment 5, and are provided within Section 3.2.4 of Attachment 2. It should also be noted that within the proposed concept, the 25m 10 lane lap pool identified in Stage 3 has been configured in such a way that it is able to be developed as a 50m 10 lane pool should there be sufficient demand.
Site Assessment
Analysis of potential sites took into consideration a number of sites as identified within the various district structure plans within the NCGC and within the current NCGC Community Facilities Plan. The three ocean pool sites (Two Rocks, Quinn’s Beach and Jindee Estate) were also identified within this assessment, but discounted on the basis that they were not considered suitable for structured aquatic programs (i.e. swimming lessons) and lap swimming (refer to Section 3.2.2 within Attachment 2).
The report identified that three sites were considered as having potential, being the Yanchep Metropolitan Centre, Alkimos Secondary Centre and Two Rocks North Secondary Centre. This was on the basis of the basis that “only facilities which are proposed to be a regional or metropolitan centre are likely to have adequate land and be located with supporting and complementary infrastructure such as public transport hubs”. The Two Rocks North Secondary Centre was discounted on the basis that “given the geography of the NCGC, establishing a major regional facility at the northern end of the region, is contrary to good planning and market demand principles.”
A multi criteria assessment of the Yanchep Metropolitan Centre and Alkimos Secondary Centre was undertaken based on the following:
· Land size;
· Availability of land;
· Cost of land;
· Zoning;
· Compatibility with adjacent properties;
· Accessibility; and
· Characteristics of the site.
The results of this analysis indicated that the Alkimos Secondary Centre was a more preferable site, with the report identifying the following in respect to qualitative assessment outcomes (Section 3.3.5 of Attachment 2):
· It is preferable to develop aquatic and dry facilities as a single operation to reduce management and other overhead costs;
· The demand analysis indicates that demand currently exists for both aquatic and indoor sports facilities in the NCGC;
· Given the similarity in demand, it is highly likely that an aquatic and leisure centre at Alkimos and Yanchep will have similar financial performance outcomes. This has been further clarified by the Consultant in the context that given the proximity of the two potential sites, demand and hence expected use of the proposed facility will be the same. Consequently, revenue and expenditures will be the same for both sites. As the topography and geotechnical conditions of both potential are not known, it is also reasonable to assume (at this point in time) that the capital costs will not vary between the sites. The commentary provided within section 3.3.5 will apply to throughout the life of development in NCGC as population increases;
· A site in Alkimos is likely to be available for development of an aquatic and leisure centre prior to a site in Yanchep;
· Alkimos is closer to the majority of the existing residential areas in the NCGC;
· Alkimos is geographically more central to the NCGC than Yanchep;
· Yanchep will be a major metropolitan centre and eventually a significant metropolitan hub for a wide range of activities; and
· All potential sites are currently “greenfield” sites, relatively flat and unlikely to have geological or topological factors which will have a significant impact on cost of development or operation.
As a result of this analysis, the Study recommended the following:
“…that the planning for an aquatic and recreation centre proceed on the basis that it is located in Alkimos, in close proximity to the proposed secondary centre.”
Impact on Wanneroo Aquamotion
As identified within the scope of the Study, consideration has been given to the impact on Aquamotion as a result of the development of an aquatic facility in the northern coastal corridor. This analysis is detail within Section 5 of Attachment 2, and concluded that:
· The proposed aquatic and leisure facility to be located in the Northern Corridor will have little or no impact on attendances at either Aquamotion or Kingsway Indoor Stadium. This is noting that 6% of swim school members and 7% of Health and Fitness members (these figures are updated from the current report) reside within the Northern Coastal Corridor and that the primary catchment for Aquamotion is the suburbs to the east of Lake Joondalup and south of the facility (including Wanneroo);
· Travel patterns relating to visiting work places, shopping centres and education institutions are a primary determinant in respect to the use of aquatic and recreation facilities;
· Population growth in Wanneroo East and Wanneroo Town Centre will have no impact on demand for an aquatic and leisure facility in the NCGC, and will increase demand for facilities and programs at both Aquamotion and Kingsway Indoor Stadium; and
· Subject to a detailed demand analysis and business case, expansion or redevelopment at another site, of Aquamotion and Kingsway Indoor Stadium is likely to be justified by 2041. In this respect it should be noted that Council considered report CR01-05/19 East Wanneroo District Structure Plan – Community Facilities Plan at its meeting held on 7 May 2019. This plan considered the provision of a regional Aquatic and Recreation facility, which it is envisaged would replace the existing Aquamotion facility.
Management and Procurement Models
The report provided an overview of existing industry based models applicable to procurement and management of aquatic and recreation facilities.
In terms of management, three categories were identified being:
· Management by the Local Government;
· External management – non Local Government provider; and
· Shared management model (focused on service delivery).
When considering the various management models, the report outlines some key areas that need to be considered including: asset management; presentation of the facility; finance; financial contribution; control; cost of change management model; responding to market demands; longevity of management; performance indicators; core purpose; management capability and risk management. These are outlined in more detail in Section 6 of Attachment 2.
The report notes that, in house management is best suited to situations where the City wishes to exert a high level of control over the day to day operation of the facility, ensure that the facility is maintained to a high standard and has the capacity to provide adequate funds for all categories of asset management including cyclical and structural maintenance, and where the City wants to directly manage its potential risk exposure.
External management is best suited to situations where the City wishes to minimise the cost of operating the recreation facility, attract capital investment in the facility or plant and equipment, use a fixed budget to operate a recreation facility and where the recreation facility competes in a dynamic market, requiring rapid response to changing market conditions. Overall, the report recommends further consideration is given when the external factors are determined. Only then can an effective and informed decision be made regarding potential management model.
In respect to procurement models, the report notes that funding for aquatic and leisure facilities is a high cost activity, and as these facilities generally operate at a loss, the private sector does not typically invest in them.
The report notes that potential funding models include:
|
Model |
Description |
|
Traditional Government Funding |
· Commercial loans, funding reserves, sponsorship and grants. |
|
External Funding Contributions |
· Usually associated with equipment provision and fit out of facilities via external partners and agencies. |
|
BOO, BOOT and PP Schemes |
· Commercial operator builds, owns and operates the facility, with BOOT scheme involving the transfer of the facility back to the Local Government after a defined period of time; and · While these schemes are used extensively for infrastructure such as schools, hospitals roads etc., they are not commonly used for aquatic and recreation facilities. |
Consultation
The consultant undertook consultation with a range of stakeholders including:
|
Stakeholder Category |
Individual Stakeholders |
|
Developers and Landowners within the NCGC |
· Land Corp, Stockland, PEET, Water Corp, Lend Lease, Satterley, Yanchep Beach Joint Venture, Estates Development Group, Capricorn Village Joint Venture, Fraser’s Property Group, Housing WA, LWP Property, Woodsome Management, Yanchep Golf Estate and Shorehaven; and · It was noted within the report that responses were limited, with seven stakeholders providing a response. |
|
Existing facility operators |
· Casey Recreation and Aquatic Centre (Vic), Peninsula Aquatic and Recreation Centre (Vic), Bendigo Aquatic and Recreation Wellness Centre (Vic), Oak Park Sport and Aquatic (Vic), Scarborough Beach Pool (WA), Cockburn Aquatic and Recreation Centre (WA) |
|
State Sporting Associations |
· Those who responded included WA Swimming Association, Diving WA, Volleyball WA and Badminton WA; and · Administration also met with the Wanneroo Basketball Association. |
No consultation has been undertaken with the broader community at this stage. Community engagement undertaken by Administration will be as per the City’s Community Engagement Policy.
Comment
Overall the report provides a clear indication that there is an identifiable need for the staged provision of a regional aquatic and recreation facility within the northern coastal growth corridor. The population of the NCGC is currently at a point, particularly considering the young demographic, where an aquatic facility with supporting sports hall would be meet the needs of the community and be adequately utilised (based on population and participation estimates) over time.
As indicated by the report, there are two locations where the facility could be developed, being the Yanchep Metropolitan Centre and Alkimos Regional Centre, with the report recommending the Alkimos Regional Centre as the preferred location. This is considered to be the most appropriate location on the basis of it being central to the NCGC and the proposed facility catchment, and also due to immediacy of land availability.
In consideration of this, however it should be noted that the Yanchep is identified by the North-west Sub-regional Planning Framework as a Strategic Metropolitan Centre. Similar in function to Joondalup, it is envisaged that Yanchep will provide regional facilities and services to the NCGC. Underpinned by a METRONET railway station, Yanchep will be a key focus for development, population growth and employment growth in coming years.
It is proposed that Administration will progress engagement of a consultant to develop a detailed Business Case that explores the various development options inclusive of a 25m or a 50m indoor pool in Alkimos and/or Yanchep. The scope for the proposed consultancy is included as Attachment 7.
It should be noted that the draft Northern Coast Growth Corridor Community Facilities Plan Review, which was recently considered by Elected Members, indicates that there may be a need for the development of both a regional and district level aquatic facility as a result of increased development density within the corridor, resulting in increased population and estimated future user demand.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
1.1.2 Facilitate Opportunities within the City to access peak and elite activities
“2 Economy
2.4 Place of Destination
2.4.1 Actively build on cultural heritage and distinctive identity to promote Wanneroo as a place to visit”
“3 Built Environment
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.2 Provide safe spaces, centre and facilities through our infrastructure management designs for community benefit and recreation”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Long Term Financial Planning |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic risk register. Action plans will be developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Stand Alone 50m Outdoor Pool
In terms of operations, the report has estimated that a stand-alone 50m outdoor pool can expect an income of approximately $304,089 per annum and expenditure of $1,174,505 per year. This would result in an operating subsidy of approximately $848,186 per annum (not including income from kiosk facilities).
In respect to the capital cost of the facility, the report has found that the preliminary estimated cost of this option would be $12.6M (noting this figure is subject to further clarification). The Order of Concept Cost Estimate for this facility has been included within Attachment 6.
Further analysis of this estimate by Administration has suggested an order of cost in the region of $14.27M to $18.55M. The lower figure is based on the initial estimate with adjusted fees and contingencies, with the upper figure inclusive of a cost variance of +/- 30%, which is considered appropriate for an estimate at an indicative concept stage.
Indoor Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre
The financial model for this facility has been outlined in detail within Section 4 of Attachment 2, based on the staging (stages 1 to 3 only) which has been identified earlier in this report. The following table provides a summary of the estimated income, expenditure and operating subsidy for the facility based on each stage:
|
|
Stage 1 |
Stage 2 |
Stage 3 |
Stage 3 (50m pool) |
|
Income |
$738,643 |
$816,696 |
$1,896,215 |
$1,896,215 |
|
Expenditure |
$1,500,569 |
$1,836,290 |
$3,977,664 |
$4,174,939 |
|
Operating Subsidy |
$761,927 |
$1,019,594 |
$2,081,450 |
$2,278725 |
By comparison the current operating subsidies for Wanneroo Aquamotion and the Kingsway Indoor Stadium are in the order of $2.7M and $240,000 respectively (2018/19).
The modelling of the above is based on the following key assumptions:
Stage 1:
· Ratio of adults:children based on demand projections;
· Ratio of adults:concession based on demand projections;
· Adults >65 years = 15% population and participation in swimming 33%;
· No discounts for multi-use tickets;
· Kiosk sales 38c/attendance for aquatic and 1.40c/attendance for sports hall - based on Town of Victoria Park (WA);
· Profit margin on kiosk 30% (based on industry standards);
· Salaries based on current City of Wanneroo salary costs for Wanneroo Aquamotion and Kingsway Indoor Stadium.
Stage 2:
· Increase in LTS attendances (10%);
· Increase in child attendances (10%);
· Increase in adult supervision attendances (20%).
Stage 3:
· Based on 2028 demand projections.
In respect to capital costs, the report has found that the total capital cost for the proposed facility is $60.6M, increasing to $66.5M with the addition of a 50m pool in Stage 3. In both instances, this cost does not include the purchase of the land, which the 2011 NCGC Community Facilities Plan estimated to be in the order of $26M.
In respect to the staging of the facility, the estimated capital cost for each stage has been estimated as per the following table:
|
Stage 1 |
Stage 2 |
Stage 3 |
Stage 4 (Amenities) |
Total |
|
|
Building Works |
$23,140,945 |
$2,641,695 |
$17,821,294 |
$5,913,837 |
$49,517,772 |
|
External Works |
$2,054,144 |
$62,633 |
$853,338 |
$162,113 |
$3,132,228 |
|
Sub Total |
$25,195,089 |
$2,704,328 |
$18,674,632 |
$6,075,950 |
$52,650,000 |
|
Margins and Adjustments |
$3,810,000 |
$410,000 |
$2,810,000 |
$920,000 |
$7,950,000 |
|
Total |
$29,000,000 |
$3,100,000 |
$21,500,000 |
$7,000,000 |
$60,600,000 |
In considering the above estimates, the report notes that these have been prepared in the absence of detailed staging methodology and therefore are subject to further review and change.
Currently the sum of $35M has been allocated in the Long Term Financial Plan for the delivery of the facility, noting that a Federal Government grant of $5M has been identified for the design component of the facility.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the North Coast Aquatic and Recreation Centre Needs and Feasibility Study, as per Attachments 1 and 2; and
2. NOTES the development of a detailed Business Case to consider the development of a proposed facility at Yanchep and/or Alkimos, with the Business Case considering various development options inclusive of a 25m or a 50m indoor pool as per the draft scope in Attachment 7.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre - Needs Assessment Report |
19/453001 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre - Feasibility Study and Business Plan |
19/453000 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Estimate |
19/453004 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - North Coast Aquatic Facility - 50m Pool - Concept Design |
19/452473 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Draft Concept Design - North Coast Aquatic and Recreation Centre (proposed) |
19/452491 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - North Coast Regional Aquatic and Recreation Centre Estimate (Outdoor Pool) |
19/453003 |
|
|
7⇩. |
Attachment 7 - DRAFT Business Case Scope - North Coast Aquatic Centre |
20/23091 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 448
File Ref: 13130V02 – 19/500402
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider petition PT02-12/19 for the provision of canteen facilities at the Kingsway Little Athletics Centre (KLAC).
Background
At the 10 December 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting, petition PT02-12/19 was received from the KLAC for the provision of canteen facilities as a part of their existing facilities.
The KLAC operates out of a leased facility on the corner of Sporting Drive and Spectator Drive at the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex in Madeley (Attachment 1). The property type is Crown Land vested in the City of Wanneroo for the purposes of recreation.
The KLAC have been in operation for over 40 years and consists of the little athletics clubs of Ballajura, Greenwood, Landsdale, Wanneroo, Woodvale and Kingsway Winter. They have a current membership of 508 which has increased from 478 over the last five years.
The current Kingsway Little Athletics building was constructed in March 2018 as storage and toilets to replace the existing storage sheds (Attachment 2). The provision of a canteen was not part of the project scope.
Detail
Petition PT02-12/19 specifically seeks the following:
“…Council’s consideration on the provision of canteen facilities at the Kingsway Little Athletics Centre.”
The petition contains 105 signatures, of which 100 signatories reside within the City of Wanneroo.
To date the KLAC have been using the Kingsway Football and Sporting Club (KFSC) canteen, however this arrangement is no longer considered to be ideal by the KLAC based on a number of factors, as outlined below:
· The canteen is not universally accessible from athletics due to its location being next to the carpark at the top of a set of stairs and a steep path. KLAC is now largest Centre in the State and heavily promote their Inclusion Programs, which has seen an influx of athletes with mental and physical disabilities join;
· There is no line of sight between the canteen and the athletics, children wanting to use the canteen cannot be supervised from athletics and the volunteers manning the canteen cannot see the children participating;
· KLAC desire to promote healthy lifestyle and offer healthy food options, which are not currently provided; and
· Not having a canteen puts the KLAC at a significant disadvantage as they are unable to raise funds that would subsidise fees and contribute to increased participation.
Based on the above, this report will recommend that a budget allowance is made within the 2020/21 financial year to further investigate suitable options for the provision of a canteen facility for the KLAC.
This investigation will include the assessment of need, proposed location, concept design, costings and funding breakdown. Pending the outcomes of this investigation the works will then be listed for consideration in the City’s 2021/22 budget.
Consultation
Administration undertook initial consultation with the KLAC as a part of the initial facility development in March 2018 and will continue to do so as a part of this subsequent investigation into the provision of a canteen facility.
It is not anticipated that broader community engagement will be required on the basis that the site sits within the Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex and as such will have minimal impact on the surrounding community.
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
This report will recommend that an amount of $10,000 be allocated in the 2020/21 budget to undertake further investigation into the options for the provision of a canteen facility for the Kingsway Little Athletics Club.
That Council:-
1. NOTES Petition PT02-12/19 tabled at its Ordinary Council Meeting of 10 December 2019;
2. NOTES that the sum of $10,000 will be listed for consideration in the 2020/21 budget to further investigate suitable options for the provision of a canteen facility for the Kingsway Little Athletics Club; and
3. AUTHORISES the Director Community and Place to advise the petition organisers of the outcomes of this report.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Kingsway Little Athletics Centre - Location Plan |
20/8238 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Kingsway Little Athletics Building - Floor Plan and Elevations |
20/10841 |
|
Place Activation
File Ref: 27871V05 – 19/364553
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider arrangements for additional parking at the Yanchep Lagoon, starting from summer 2020/2021, to cater for future increased patronage.
Background
The Yanchep Lagoon Precinct (YLP) is currently a seasonal destination where the number of people visiting the area increases significantly between winter and summer. Population growth in the suburbs in the vicinity of the YLP is also increasing the number of potential visitors.
At its meeting of 27 August 2019, Council endorsed the final Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan (Master Plan), which is intended as a guide for future planning and activation initiatives in the area. The Master Plan process identified the potential for the coastal area to provide current and future locals and visitors with a range of services, community activities and public amenity if appropriately enhanced. In order to cater for these additional initiatives, adequate car parking will be a critical consideration, particularly in a foreshore area where parking is already, and will continue to be, at a premium.
Past years have seen a shortfall of parking during summer (refer to Attachment 1 for an example from summer 2018/19). With an increased focus on activation initiatives throughout the Yanchep Lagoon, it is anticipated that the demand for parking will increase, particularly during the summer months.
The provision of additional car bays in reasonably close proximity to the old surf club redevelopment site would assist in alleviating tenant concerns regarding the availability of adequate parking to support sustainable operations, particularly in summer when the nearby carparks are full.
As a means of more effectively catering for the excess demand for parking during peak summer periods, consideration has recently been given to providing additional parking opportunities within the YLP, with the aim of having these available from summer 2020/21.
Detail
Proposed Location of Additional Parking
The opportunity for additional parking is scarce given that the area falls within a Bush Forever site. Areas already cleared of vegetation and/or existing road reserves were subject to a high level analysis of safety, technical design requirements, alignment with the Master Plan and likelihood of securing approvals, to identify potential locations for additional parking.
A location along Capricorn Esplanade (north of the Brazier Road – Capricorn Esplanade roundabout) has been identified as a relatively straight forward option to provide additional bays in the short term. This location is within the Capricorn Esplanade road reserve, and clearing of native vegetation to facilitate car parking is minimal.
Administration considers that the proposed parking area is likely to remain a road reserve into the future, given the connection with Capricorn Estate and entrance to Mary Lindsay Homestead and there is already sufficient width in the road reserve to provide bays immediately east of the roadway.
The proposed parking location has a retaining wall to the east of the road reserve. The retaining wall would provide the eastern extent of the parking bays.
Temporary vs Permanent Parking
Temporary Parking
It is proposed to install temporary parking in the first instance, constructed from crushed limestone, a natural material that is consistent with the local coastal environment. Attachment 2 displays the proposed design for temporary parallel parking in this location. The bays would not specifically be marked out; however, it will be clear that the City is encouraging people to use this area for parking in preference to other unsuitable locations (such as the roundabout). Visitors will be able to parallel park along this strip of road.
Temporary parking has the advantage of trialling the success of the location before a permanent installation is put in place. In addition, because there are still planning works needing to be undertaken regarding servicing requirements, development staging and the ultimate car parking solution for the YLP, a temporary option in the first instance provides more flexibility to adapt to future development scenarios.
Permanent Parking
Attachment 3 presents a proposed concept design for the construction of permanent parallel parking in this location, comprising the following:
· Twenty one permanent, marked car bays;
· Three raised wombat crossings and associated street lighting;
· A pedestrian pathway directing visitors south toward the Brazier Road – Capricorn Esplanade roundabout and to cross the road to the wider dual use path on the western side of the road.
If permanent bays are the preferred option, it will be a good opportunity to install wombat crossings (raised crosswalks to slow traffic) whilst construction is underway. Raised wombat crossings with appropriate street lighting are a traffic tool used to encourage slower driver speeds. This would be beneficial given the nearby residential area and to encourage a low speed environment within the YLP. If wombat crossings are installed, there is a requirement to provide suitable lighting and an analysis of the best location for the wombat crossings indicates that the current light poles would require relocation.
A concrete pathway would be constructed immediately east of the parking bays, adjacent to the existing retaining wall to direct people south toward the Brazier Road – Capricorn Esplanade roundabout and enable them to cross the road to the wider dual use path on the western side of the road.
Consultation
As part of the preparation of the Master Plan in 2018/19, community engagement identified public access and inadequate parking as critical items for early consideration and subsequent improvement during the planning and design phases of the project. Even after the Master Plan engagement process, parking continues to be a focal point for the community.
The recently established Yanchep Lagoon Community Working Group met in December 2019 and was presented with the temporary and permanent parking options. In considering these options, the Working Group indicated their preference was to progress with the permanent parking option, rather than the temporary parking, given this would likely end up permanent in the future.
Comment
Need for Additional Parking
Transport and Accessibility
In line with adopting a sustainable approach to development and enhancement of the YLP, it will be important for the City to provide adequate vehicle parking (visitors, disabled access, emergency access and commercial service vehicles), whilst encouraging increased use of public transport and pedestrian-focused facilities over time, for connection with regional locations of interest, such as the Yanchep National Park, Two Rocks, the future Yanchep town site and the upcoming Yanchep METRONET station. The aim will be to phase in several modes of public transport and pedestrian accessibility as part of regional planning connectivity to the area.
Whilst progression of a future Transport Strategy will identify options for parking and staging; sustainable transport; and connection of the YLP to the regional tourism network, this planning work will not be completed until late-2020 and staging of resultant works is likely to be some time off yet. Early consideration of simple parking locations is needed to cater for current and anticipated future summer demand.
People are currently parking within the location being considered, and the City aims to make certain areas more accessible and send the message of where we wish for people to park. Currently visitors are parking along the bend on Brazier Road and around the Brazier Road – Capricorn Esplanade roundabout, which is unsafe and results in Rangers having to patrol and issue fines. The City wishes to, over the short to medium term, landscape unsafe areas to restrict ease of parking and provide better access to the more suitable areas and encourage people away from the unsuitable locations.
Development at the former Yanchep Surf Club
In addition to the broader public need to meet parking demand and address the safety issue, the provision of additional parking will also support future demand for the proposed development at the former surf lifesaving club site.
Further to the resolution of Council in April 2019 (refer CS07-04/19), Administration has progressed with negotiations to finalise an Agreement for Lease with the future lessee. The Agreement for Lease (once finalised and subject to the approval of the Minister for Lands) will incorporate the terms of the long term ground lease of the site. Given that a successful development at the site will increase visitor numbers in the YLP, Administration recommends that additional parking is secured as part of the City’s assistance to the lessee. The parking proposed in this report is an initial measure to promote the proposed development at the former surf lifesaving club site, with other parking options to be investigated in the course of implementation of the Master Plan.
Proposed Parking Location
Bush Forever No. 397 covers the entire YLP and as such, clearing is intended to be minimised. Where possible, parking will be provided in areas already cleared, although ultimately additional parking is likely to be required outside cleared areas to support the ultimate form of development within the YLP. An Economic Feasibility Strategy (currently underway) and Flora and Vegetation Assessment (almost complete) will inform where these locations might be.
The proposed location along Capricorn Esplanade will not require more than the minor clearing of a number of small shrubs. Administration also notes that the location was previously cleared to facilitate the construction of the Capricorn Esplanade road and retaining wall.
Temporary vs Permanent
In considering temporary versus permanent parking options, the following benefits and considerations are provided:
|
|
TEMPORARY |
PERMANENT |
|
Advantages |
· Crushed limestone is more cost effective · Limestone is a natural coastal material · Bay locations are easily moved · Reflects Master Plan’s “touch the ground lightly” approach · Infrastructure Assessment will be completed and can inform requirements |
· Cheaper in the long term · Single stage approach · Minimal risk in not being a suitable location for parking |
|
Disadvantages |
· Additional maintenance required
|
· Initial higher expense · Infrastructure Assessment not complete · If service upgrades are required, horizontal boring only option (expensive and may not be suitable with limestone geology) |
The main consideration with the permanent parking option is that an Infrastructure Assessment of the YLP has only just commenced. This will provide a thorough understanding of the current status of infrastructure services to and within the site and what upgrades, if any, may be required to facilitate the ultimate enhancement of the YLP in line with the Master Plan.
Administration has completed a “Dial-Before-You-Dig” investigation and liaised with the service utility providers, which has concluded that the depth of the current services will not impact on construction of the permanent parking option. However, should the City need to upgrade services in the future, horizontal boring under the road reserve, parking bays and paths would be the only option, which is expensive and may not be achievable with the geology in the area.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the City progress with the construction of temporary parking in the immediate term, until such time as the Infrastructure Assessment has been finalised to confirm the risk of having to dig up or damage existing permanent parking if service upgrades below the surface are required.
The temporary parking option also aligns with one of the key visions in the Master Plan which was to “touch the ground lightly”. Administration can monitor the success of the temporary option over time and liaise further with the Yanchep Lagoon Community Working Group regarding future upgrades. Given that suitable locations for parking in the YLP will be scarce due to the native vegetation and foreshore environment, it is anticipated that if locations are determined as suitable for temporary parking, these will likely be converted to permanent in the future, as a means of restricting clearing of Bush Forever. The Capricorn Esplanade site is one such location.
Statutory Compliance
Discussions are being undertaken with the Department of Planning, Lands & Heritage to establish the requirements to facilitate any vegetation clearing, particularly in relation to clearing within the road reserves.
It is understood from previous discussions that any development proceeding the preparation and State approval of a Foreshore Management Plan will require a Development Application. However, upgrading for temporary purposes and/or public works upgrades (such as parking / road reservation works) in the road reserves are likely to be subject to different requirements.
The outcomes of these discussions will define the timing for construction of any parking, dual use path and pedestrian crosswalks to have these in place by early summer.
Legislation to be complied with during the implementation of the Master Plan includes:
· Planning and Development Act 2005;
· Environmental Protection Act 1986;
· Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985;
· Land Administration Act 1997; and
· Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.3 Distinctive Places
1.3.1Create distinctive places based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S12 Economic Growth |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance and Director Community & Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-022 Environmental Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-017 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O23 Safety of Community |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans are in place/have been developed to manage/mitigate this risk.
In addition the Yanchep Lagoon Masterplan process identified the potential for the coastal area to provide current and future locals and visitors with a range of services, community activities and public amenities if appropriately enhanced. In order to cater for these additional initiatives, adequate car parking will be a critical consideration, particularly in a foreshore area where parking is already and will continue to be at a premium.
Policy Implications
It is expected at a minimum that the City will need to consider and align with the following policies:
· State Planning Policy 2.8 – Bushland Policy for the Perth Metropolitan Region;
· State Planning Policy 2.6 – State Coastal Planning Policy;
· Yanchep Two Rocks District Structure Plan; and
· City’s Coastal Hazard Risk Management & Adaptation Plan.
Financial Implications
To facilitate early activation of the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan actions and investigations, $100,000 was provided in the 2019/20 budget. Of this, approximately $25,000 is required for consultant fees for the Flora and Vegetation Survey and around $50,000 for consultant fees for the Economic Feasibility Strategy. The remaining $25,000 will be required to cover Stage 1 of the Infrastructure Capacity Strategy, with a Request for Quotation released to market.
As a result funds will be required to facilitate the design and construction of the additional parking.
It is estimated that the construction of the additional parking options and any associated pathways, appropriate pedestrian crosswalks and lighting will be:
· Temporary Parking Option - approximately $57,000; and
· Permanent Parking Option - approximately $180,000 - $190,000.
Given no allowance has been made for this purpose in the current financial year, construction of additional parking at YLP will need to be undertaken in the first half of the 2020/21, with construction anticipated to be September to November 2020. Construction would be subject to appropriate allocations in the 2020/21 budget.
To facilitate the costs associated with parking option designs (completed) and agency negotiations and approvals work (yet to be completed), a total of $12,000 municipal funds are proposed to been transferred from the obsolete PR-2495 Yanchep Trails and Pathways project during the 2019/20 Mid-Year Budget Review process.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the requirement for additional parking at the Yanchep Lagoon Precinct;
2. SUPPORTS the construction of additional parking bays along Capricorn Esplanade north of the Brazier Road – Capricorn Esplanade roundabout (east of the old surf club site, Lot 10603 Brazier Road, Yanchep), as shown in Attachment 2;
3. ENDORSES the initial construction of temporary parking bays, with the construction of permanent bays to be considered following the completion of the Yanchep Lagoon Infrastructure Assessment;
4. NOTES that $12,000 municipal funds from the obsolete PR-2495 Yanchep Trails and Pathways project will be listed for reallocation during the 2019/20 Mid-Year Budget Review process, to cover expenses associated with concept design preparation and regulatory approvals; and
5. NOTES that funds for construction of the additional parking will be listed for consideration in the 2020/21 Capital Works Budget.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Summer Overflow Parking |
20/19410 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Capricorn Esplanade - Construction Plan - Stage 1 |
19/424495 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Capricorn Esplanade - Construction Plan - Stage 2 |
19/424498 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 468
File Ref: 35722 – 20/11961
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the future operation of the City’s Girrawheen Hub, following the expiry of the Local Project Local Jobs grant in June 2020.
Background
Girrawheen is a highly diverse area with 41% of its 9,000 residents born overseas and 39 languages other than English being spoken in the area. Through the City’s dialogue with State Government stakeholders and peak multicultural bodies, it was identified that multicultural groups had limited access to appropriate office and meeting space to undertake community activities and administrative tasks.
An opportunity arose in 2017 to use a vacated City building, adjacent to the Girrawheen Library and Girrawheen Koondoola Senior Citizens Centre to create the Girrawheen Hub. Local Projects Local Jobs funding of $100,000 was provided by the State Government (through the Office of Multicultural Interests) specifically to support the establishment multicultural office space within the Girrawheen Hub (the Hub) over a period of three years.
Under the terms of the grant, funds have been expended on:
· Partial refurbishment and fit out of the Hub to make it suitable for use by multicultural organisations;
· Contribution to utilities and other costs associated with the project;
· Subsidy of hire costs, enabling multicultural groups to use office and meeting spaces at the Hub free of charge;
· Provision of a dedicated office space for the Organisation of African Communities (OAC).
Outside of the Local Projects Local Jobs project, the facility is hired to not for profit and commercial user groups, attracting a fee and resulting in a significant offset to the use that is provided free of charge. All potential users are vetted to ensure alignment with the Hub’s remit to provide employment readiness skills, social enterprise and micro-economic support and social support to residents and the wider multicultural community.
Since the commencement of the Hub project, use of the facility has grown to an average of 2000 people per month, with satisfaction levels extremely high. In addition, a number of strategic City initiatives have progressed, including the following:
· In 2018, the City endorsed a pilot project that aims to activate the wider Girrawheen Hub Precinct through the Girrawheen Place Activation Plan, inform the City’s approach to place activation and underpin the evolution of its Place Framework;
· Local Area Planning undertaken in 2019 affirmed the importance of the services, facilities and programs offered within the Girrawheen Precinct by the Senior Citizens Centre, the Girrawheen Library and the Hub; and
· The Girrawheen Koondoola Local Area Plan subsequently incorporated an action to ‘Redevelop City Buildings in Girrawheen – Investigation into integrated services, programs and activities offered by the Girrawheen Hub, Library and Senior Citizens Centre’, which involves the completion of a Needs Assessment in 2020/21, followed by a Feasibility Study in 2021/22.
The Local Project Local Jobs grant expires in June 2020 at which time the funds are expected to be fully spent. This report proposes continuance of the multicultural groups’ usage of the Hub for a further period of three years under current terms and conditions, but funded by the City in order to provide stability and continued access by multicultural groups while the City investigates the strategic direction of the Hub, in the context of potential redevelopment of the building and associated co-located facilities in Girrawheen.
Detail
In looking to the future, five options have been assessed and considered, as outlined below.
· Business as Usual (Short Term) - Recommended
This option will provide stability and continued access by multicultural groups, whilst the City investigates the strategic direction of the Hub and the future of the Girrawheen Hub building.
· Rebuild, Renew or Upgrade as Precinct Model (Medium Term) – Recommended
Investigation of this option will occur through the needs analysis and feasibility study to inform future decisions of Council.
· Contract service to external provider – Not Recommended
This is not timely in the present circumstances, but will be considered during the needs assessment and feasibility study.
· Creation of Partnership(s) – Not recommended
This is not timely in the present circumstances, but will be considered during the needs assessment and feasibility study.
· Cessation of service – Not Recommended
As outlined in this report, the service currently offered at the Hub is highly valued, and is well supported by its users and the wider community.
Further information on the City’s preferred options is outlined in the table below:
|
Timeframe |
Option |
Scenario |
Considerations |
Indicative Cost |
|
Short – Mid Term
|
Business as Usual |
The service is delivered at the current facility by City staff, with minimal asset maintenance, and waiver of fees for multicultural groups covered by the City.
Future service level by City staff, hire arrangements and financial model to be determined through co-design process, needs analysis, feasibility study and concept design. |
· Unexpected maintenance costs, due to the age and condition of the building · Hire income to offset cost of waiver of fees to CaLD groups · A Needs Analysis and subsequent Feasibility Study to be undertaken · Funding model and sources determined for redeveloped facility |
Same as present, with an additional cost of approximately $13,523 being the offset between paid hire and fee waivers for the 2020/21 – 2022/23 financial years. |
|
Mid – Long Term |
Rebuild, Renew or Upgrade as Precinct Model |
The facility is potentially rebuilt, renewed or upgraded in existing location or other, as an integrated precinct model consisting of Library, Senior Citizens Centre and Hub. |
· Opportunity to raise extra income through revenue add-ons in a new facility · Project listed in Girrawheen Koondoola Local Area Plan: Action Plan as ‘Redevelopment of City Buildings in Girrawheen – Investigation into integrated services, programs and activities offered by the Girrawheen Hub, Girrawheen Library and Senior Citizens Centre’ · Ability to ensure fit for purpose and adaptable facility, through community design process · Opportunity to consider the role of other community facilities such as Hainsworth Community Centre in the investigation
|
Building options are estimated to be in the range of $3m - $9.6m, depending on the approach taken.
|
Consultation
Regular consultation with Hub user groups occurs through bi-annual hirer and user group meetings, a monthly newsletter and face to face conversations. Community engagement is continuing through the implementation of the Place Activation Plan, programs such as Love Where You Live – Girrawheen, and the Girrawheen Community Garden project, in addition to the extensive community input into the development of the Girrawheen Koondoola Local Area Plan.
The Executive President of the OAC, Mr Joe Tuazama, has told the City that he believes that the success of the Hub is founded on respect, collaboration and equity between the user groups. It is his view that the Hub project is unique and provides a model and standard that could be replicated in other local government areas with similarly highly diverse communities.
A recent poll of regular users revealed a majority are ‘Very Satisfied’ with the service provided, which enables them to facilitate a wide range of programs including workshops, youth programs, organisational meetings, office space, school aged learning, and dance, language and cultural programs.
Comment
The success of the Girrawheen Hub project is founded on addressing community needs by building community capacity, strengthening organisational development, and providing job skills, training and social support. The Hub is a unique facility that is recognised for its successful and innovative approach across levels of government, not for profit groups and multicultural organisations, and acknowledged as being of the highest value to the communities that utilise the service.
Since instigating the Girrawheen Hub in 2017, the City has taken a place activation approach with a focus on providing needs-based support that caters to the culturally diverse local community. This has provided the catalyst for a lively and complementary community offer, drawing a range of customers for a variety of purposes, delivering quality services and providing a true Community Precinct.
Expiry of the funding agreement provides an opportunity to consider the future direction and resourcing of the Hub and presents some significant opportunities to embed place principles as part of the project.
A City commitment to the continuation of the waiver of fees up to an amount of $25,000 would be for the same purpose as the existing grant agreement and would be for each of the 2020/21 – 2022/23 financial years. It would support service level stability and continued access by eligible multicultural groups during the needs and feasibility investigations that is anticipated to be finalised in June 2023, and inform subsequent decision making by Council. Through ongoing promotion of the Hub to commercial and other fee paying user groups, there is potential for the fee waiver to be substantially, it not totally offset by use fee income.
Investigation of a rebuild, renewal or upgrade of all three City facilities into an integrated centre, as included in the Girrawheen Koondoola Local Area Action Plan, provides an opportunity to decide the way forward and extent of future service delivery in the precinct.
The recommendations of this report seek to address inter-connected strategic City initiatives, enable support of the City’s multicultural communities through continuance of this highly successful service over the next three years, and allow time for the City to conduct a responsible and timely review on future community facilities provision in Girrawheen.
Statutory Compliance
Not applicable
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.4 Connected Communities
1.4.2 Strengthen community and customer connectedness through community hubs”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Co-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The Hub project aligns with the City’s Access and Inclusion Plan 2018 Objective 8 which states that ‘All people can culturally, socially and economically contribute to the community’ with supporting actions to ‘Build community confidence and capacity to participate in all aspects of community life’ and ‘Facilitate and support multicultural capacity building initiatives’.
On the Community Impact Continuum of the Social Strategy 2019, the project is currently situated between the ‘Transactional approach’ and ‘Community based approach’. It is intended to move the Hub project to the ‘Fully integrated approach to planning’, through extensive engagement and a community co-design approach during the Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study.
Financial Implications
Actual figures from 2018/19 demonstrate that income from user pays facility booking fees ($18,385) is close to fully offsetting the cost of subsidised use of the facility under the current terms and conditions of the Local Projects Local Jobs grant ($22,265). This represents a differential of $3,880 noting that this gap is currently met by the grant.
Should the City continue the current service model offered at the Hub, beyond expiry of the grant, an estimated allocation of $25,000 per year will be required to cover potential fee waivers for the 2020/21 – 2022/23 financial years.
This allocation is expected to be offset by user pays hire income to the extent that the net costs are estimated to be approximately $5,000 per year. Increased promotion and advertising of user pays hire opportunities has the potential to further narrow the gap between subsidised and user pays income. Notwithstanding this, it is considered that the subsidy is within the scope of other support offered to community, sporting and cultural groups, and would reinforce the Hub as a significant and important community investment.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the progress update provided on the Girrawheen Hub;
2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the subsidised use of the Girrawheen Hub by eligible multicultural groups by waiving hire fees to a maximum value of $25,000 per year following the expiry of the Local Projects Local Jobs grant in June 2020, until such time as a decision can be made on the future of the Girrawheen Hub building;
3. NOTES that an allocation of $25,000 per year will be listed for consideration in the 2020/21 – 2022/23 financial years’ budget considerations to provide continued service delivery at the Girrawheen Hub under the current model; and
4. NOTES that an allocation of $50,000 per year will be listed for consideration in the 2020/21 and 2021/22 financial years’ budget considerations to support the investigation into the Rebuild, Renew or Upgrade of the Girrawheen Hub as a Precinct Model.
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 36171V02 – 20/12358
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
To consider the Mid-Year Review (MYR) of the Annual Budget for 2019/20 (Annual Budget) and the Corporate Business Plan 2019/20 - 2022/23.
Background
Regulation 33A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to carry out a review of its Annual Budget for that year between 1 January and 31 March in each year. Within 30 days after the review is carried out, the review is to be submitted to the Council for consideration. Council is to consider the review and determine whether or not to adopt. The Revised Budgets resulting from the MYR are detailed in Attachments 1, 2 and 3 and are inclusive of endorsed amendments from Council and MYR recommendations.
This review of the Corporate Business Plan (CBP) 2019/20 to 2022/23 was conducted in conjunction with the legislated mid-year budget review to capture any financial implications to proposed changes as outlined in Attachment 4.
Detail
Annual Budget 2019/20
The MYR of the Annual Budget was undertaken during the month of January 2020 based on data as at 31 December 2019. Commentaries on Revised Budgets as a result of the MYR are provided below.
The overall adjustments captured through the MYR reflect an unfavourable impact to the Result from Operations of $918k, with the end of year Result from Operations post MYR reducing from a Budget Surplus of $843k to a Deficit of $75k. With the Capital Program, the Revised Budget post MYR is projected to be $90.4m, representing a $8.4m reduction. Budgeted Net Transfers from Reserves have reduced by $2.1m which is largely due to decreased requirement towards Capital Projects.
Statement of Comprehensive Income (Attachment 1)
Operating Income (-$1.2m)
Rates (-$942k)
The full year forecast has reduced the Rating Income by reducing Interim Rates by $942k to $134.6m. This is due to successful objections by Developers on the Super Lots of $576k and similarly on Residential Properties of $286k. In addition, there have been amended valuations from Landgate for Residential Properties against Base Rates of $124k.
Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions (+$941k)
The City is expected to experience an increase in government funded grants and other income of $941k. The major accounts affecting this increase are:
· Operating Grant Income - State Government increased by $601k (7.1%), reflecting an additional $177k of Financial Assistant Grant for general purpose; $147k of Grant due to extension of Department of Communities contract; and $205k for Mitigation Activity Fund.
· Court Fees for Debt Recovery increase of $389k (141.3%) being offset by increase in expenditure. This increase in fees reflects the increase in attention to the long outstanding overdue Rates.
Fees and Charges (-$238k)
The full year forecast is revised down by $238k (-1%) with the major accounts affecting income under this category being:
· Facility Booking Fee Income from Sport Playing Surfaces has been decreased by $450k (10.9%) to reflect in reduction of internal accounting entry for subsidies provided by the City. The contra adjustment is also reflected under materials and contract expenditure as noted below;
· User or Entry Fee Income within Community Facilities has been increased by $492k (25%) to accommodate growth of the membership of Aquamotion as a result of promotions and sales training;
· Land Development Supervision Fee Income has decreased by $200k (57.1%) due to the subdued activity in sub-divisions in the Perth property market.
Interest Earnings (-$1.14m)
The budget forecast is decreased by $1.14m (-13%) as a result of the historically low Cash Rate (currently at 0.75%). The current weighted average interest rates are ranging between 2.61% in July 2019 and 2.03% in December 2019. The interest rates being negotiated on renewals of term deposits is between 1.50% and 1.60% which has been taken into account to amend the expected interest income for the year.
Other Revenue (+$148k)
Key reasons for overall $148k increase is due to a reimbursement of extra Waste Recovery costs from the City’s insurer, Local Government Insurance Scheme (LGIS), for $250k offset by $102k lower Sale of products and Miscellaneous Income which has been reduced due to actual income lower than anticipated.
Operating Expenses (+309k)
Employee Costs (+$954k)
The full year forecast for Employee Costs is a decrease of $954k which allows for vacancies and efficiencies obtained from improved processes of $1.2m offset by slight increase of $226k mainly due to lower project administration recoveries.
This mid-year forecast has been completed after considering increased Capital Works in the second half of the financial year. Once allowances for workers compensation insurance and changes to employee enterprise agreements are factored in, all other Salaries and Wages accounts are tracking as per the Annual Revised Budget with no Mid-Year Adjustments being required.
Materials and Contracts (-$700k)
The full year Materials and Contracts budget is revised to $69.3m, being an increase of $700k (+1.0%) compared to Revised Budget. Explanations of the larger areas of change are outlined below:
· Contract Expenses (+$590k):
Decrease in contract expenses of $590k is mainly attributable to reduction in web and graphic design services of $362k in this financial year and reduction of internal accounting entry for subsidies provided by the City of $450k. The contra adjustment is also reflected under fees and charges as noted above.
These savings are offset by an increase in emergency services expenditure of $100k due to increased Work Orders set up for Yanchep Fire and Volunteer Bushfire Brigade (VBFB) Medicals (not cover by the Emergency Services Levy (ESL).
In addition, there has been an increase in commercial bin hire and managing Customer & Information services of $99k due to unanticipated contract variations.
· Refuse Removal Expenses (-$1.3m):
The key variance relates to increase in Domestic Recycled Refuse Removal expenses of $1.6m driven by the higher rate charged for diverting waste to the Mindarie Regional Council (MRC) as a result of the fire at the Cleanaway site at South Guildford. This is offset by reduction in bulk rubbish collection expenses of $153k, reduced tonnage collected from removing verge and illegal dumping of $66k and reduced expenditure of $99k in Engineering Maintenance services in line with projected decrease in materials to be disposed.
As noted above under “Other Revenue”, the City’s insurer, LGIS will reimburse approximately $250k to offset the additional recycling costs incurred of $1.6m.
Utility Charges (+$64k)
A decrease in utility charges of $64k (1%), being driven by a reduction in telephone costs of $60k and water consumption costs of $35k offset by slight increase in Electricity costs of $28k.
Other Revenues & Expenses (-$5.9m)
Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions (+$72k)
The forecast end of year figure represents an overall increase of $72k (0.2%), being the net result of grant upward adjustments as detailed in Attachment 2.
Contributed Physical Assets ($No change)
As at the end of December 2019 $5.2m contributed assets were recorded against the Annual Budget of $16.3m. There have been no indications of changes to the timing of the handover of assets from Developers and as such no amendment to the current year forecast.
Profit/(Loss) on Asset Disposals (+$103k)
A $103k increase (+18%) is identified, attributed to higher than expected sales at Tamala Park due to improving market conditions.
Developer Contribution Plans (DCP) & Town Planning Schemes (TPS) (-$6.1m)
Latest planning activities have indicated developers’ contributions will be lower than the Annual Budget by $6.1m (84%). The main changes are as a result of:
|
Description |
Amount ($) |
|
TPS – Yanchep/Two Rocks Community Facilities – Revised DCP Rate |
(841,254) |
|
East Wanneroo Cell 1 - Reduced cash capital contribution |
(666,407) |
|
East Wanneroo Cell 9 – Reduced cash capital contribution |
(1,694,000) |
|
East Wanneroo Cell 9 – Public Open Spaces (POS) acquisition and development |
(2,640,000) |
|
TPS – Alkimos/Eglinton Community Facilities - Reduced cash capital contribution |
(368,930) |
|
East Wanneroo Cell 3 – Additional cash capital contribution |
112,288 |
|
Total |
(6,098,303) |
Capital Projects (Attachment 2) (+$8.4m)
Review of the Capital Program has produced various adjustments to projects as detailed in Attachment 2. These adjustments have resulted in a net reduction in the capital program of $8.4m, with the post MYR Revised Budget projected to be $90.4m.
With particular attention paid to the timing of the spending on large projects, there have been a number of projects relinquishing funds in 2019/20 for consideration during the 2020/21 Capital Budget development deliberations.
Some of the major deferrals, and the explanations for them, are as follows:
· PR-2955 – Halesworth Park, Butler, New Sports Facilities (+$5.5m)
To be re-budgeted due to delays in the receipt of the clearing permit.
· PR-2664 – Southern Suburbs Library, Landsdale, New Building (+$250k)
Funds to be re-budgeted in 2020/21, due to review of concept design to suit Landsdale site and internal stakeholder requirements. Detailed design as per Council approval is scheduled for 2020/21.
· PR-4071 – Renew Customer Request Management (CRM) System (+$199K)
The City’s focus has been on the delivery of the Financial Management Information System (FMIS) and the development of the Asset Management Information System (AMIS) resulting in deferral of the CRM to be re-budgeted in 2020/21.
In addition, the following new projects have been identified:
· PR-1464 – Purchase New Waste Recyling Bins (-$176k)
This re-classifies the purchase from Operating to Capital expenditure when we buy new bins.
· PR-4243 – Gumblossom Park, upgrade soccer fence (-$17k)
The soccer fence at Gumblossom Park, Quinns Rocks requires modification to provide space for temporary dugout structures during the soccer season. This will improve safety at the site.
· PR-4244 – New centre management system for Aquamotion and Kingsway (-$100k)
The facilities at Aquamotion and Kingsway Indoor Stadium require a new centre management system to replace the old system (Class) which is no longer supported by the provider. Without IT support for the current system, the City is at risk if any issues were to arise.
· PR-4246 – Wangara Greens Recycling Facility, Wangara, new waste oil storage shed (-$15K)
A new waste oil storage shed is urgently required at the City’s greens recycling facility in Wangara to allow for the increase to the range of products that ratepayers are able to drop off at the facility.
· PR-4247 – Wangara Transfer Station, Wangara upgrade site works (-$200k)
As a result of the recent fire at the Cleanaway recycling facility in South Guildford, the City has had to urgently recommission the facility at Wangara to temporarily store the recycling collected as part of the domestic waste collection service. Works include the construction of a sump.
· PR-4249 – Abbeville Park, Mindarie, Oval extension (-$33k)
An extension to the existing oval is required to allow for two full sized soccer ovals to enable expanded capacity.
· PR-4250 – Edgar Griffiths Park, Wanneroo, New car park (-$10k)
To support the new dog park, an additional car park is required due to capacity issues.
· PR-4251 – St Andrews Park, Yanchep, Upgrade soccer pitch to new location (-$20k)
Funds required to relocate soccer pitch to suit new school site.
· PR-4252 – Capricorn Esplanade, Yanchep, New traffic management treatments (-$12k)
Funds required for traffic management improvements as part of the Yanchep Lagoon Masterplan.
Rate Setting Statement (refer to Attachment 3)
The Rate Setting Statement outlined in Attachment 3 represents a composite view of the finances of the City. It is based on the movement of Operations and Capital Works revenue and expenditure providing an indication of the required Rating income. The resultant position identifies a reduction in Rates to be raised of $942k, inclusive of a net decrease from Reserves of $2.1m.
Corporate Business Plan (CBP)
As part of the mid-year review process, responsible officers have had the opportunity to review the adopted initiatives and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) captured within the CBP and make recommendations for changes.
Mid-year CBP Review Summary of Changes
· 7 changes to initiative descriptions to reflect changes in scope or deliverable
· 1 new initiative added
· 10 initiatives recommended for deferral of completion dates to 2020/21
· 2 new KPIs added
· 10 changes to KPI descriptions
· 4 changes to KPI targets
· 30 KPIs to be removed for monitoring internally by Executive
Consultation
Internal stakeholders.
Comment
Mid-year Annual Budget Review Summary of Changes
Operating
Total operating changes submitted through the MYR equate to an unfavourable movement of $918k which is summarised as:
· A reduction in Rates by $942k as a result of objections to valuations.
· An increase in Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions $941k.
· Reduction in Fees & Charges and Interest Income of $238k and $1.1m respectively.
· An increase in Other Income by $148k with the main change being a reimbursement of $250k from LGIS for additional recycling costs incurred;
· A decrease in Employee Costs of $954k, with $1.2m due to vacancies and efficiencies offset by lower project administration recoveries of $226k.
· An increase in materials and contracts by $700k mainly due to higher waste recycling fees offset by lower contract expenditure with deferral of projects.
Capital
Of the $8.4m reduction in the Capital Program budget a large proportion has been deferred for consideration in 2020/21. With regard to the financial impact on Municipal Funds a reduced draw of $2.4m has been identified.
Yanchep/Two Rocks Developer Contribution Plan (DCP) - Loan Extension
The operating period of the Developer Contribution Plan for Yanchep/Two Rocks was approved through Council on 13 November 2018 as part of the Town Planning Scheme amendment 166 (Gazetted on 18 June 2019) from 10 to 16 years. The City’s projections indicate that 16 years will be required to generate adequate funding without significantly increasing the cost per dwelling. As a consequence, the current existing loans with Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) which have a maturity date of 8 September 2024 need to be extended by six years to 2 December 2030 as per preliminary negotiations with CBA (Recommendation 2).
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 33A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to carry out a review of its Annual Budget for that year between 1 January and 31 March in each year. Within 30 days after the review is carried out, the review is to be submitted to the Council for consideration. Council is to consider the review and determine whether or not to adopt.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
The tables below outline the Strategic and Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Integrated Planning and Reporting |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Leadership Team |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage the risks and to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The MYR has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements detailed in the City’s Accounting Policy and Strategic Budget Policy.
Financial Implications
As outlined above and detailed in Attachments 1, 2 and 3. The CBP initiatives that are proposed for deferral to 2020/21 have been incorporated in the review of the current budget.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council APPROVES by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:
1. The Mid-Year Review of the Annual Budget for the 2019/20 financial year in accordance with Regulation 33A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, as shown in Attachments 1, 2 and 3;
2. The extension of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia loans tenure to fund the Yanchep/ Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan to 2 December 2030; and
3. The proposed changes to the Corporate Business Plan 2019/20–2022/23 outlined in the Mid-Year Corporate Business Plan Review report, as shown in Attachment 4.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Statement of Comprehensive Income MYR 2019-20 |
20/35786 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - 2019-20 Capital MYR |
20/35802 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Rate Setting Statement MYR 2019-20 |
20/35794 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Corporate Business Plan 2019-20 Mid-year Review Report |
20/21605 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 507
File Ref: 30724V04 – 19/481406
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 30 November 2019.
Background
In accordance with Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
“Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. For the 2019/20 financial year the statement of financial activity will be presented by nature and type.
Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2019/20 financial year 10% and a value greater than $100,000 will be used for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
Council adopted the Annual Budget for the 2019-20 financial year on 28 June 2019 (SCS01-06/19). The figures in this report are compared to the Adopted Budget.
Comments Month-to-Date
The Financial Activity Statement Report for the month of November 2019 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations before Other Revenue & Expenses, of $933k.
The favourable variance is due to higher Operating Revenue, underspend in Employment Costs partially offset by higher Materials and Contracts expenses.
Comments Year-to-Date
The Financial Activity Statement Report for the year-to-date of November 2019 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations before Other Revenue & Expenses, of $4.1m.
The favourable variance is due to underspend in Employment Costs and Materials and Contracts expenses.
Results from Operations
Capital Program
Overall Comments on Year-to-Date (YTD) Figures
Results from Operations
Capital Program
Investment Portfolio Performance
Detailed Analysis of Statement of Comprehensive Income (Attachment 1)
Comments relating to the Statement of Comprehensive Income are provided under the following two sections:
a) Current month comparison of Actuals to Budgets; and
b) Year to date of Actuals to Budgets.
where the variance is higher than reporting threshold or item of interest to Council.
Revenues
Note 1 Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date - (Actual $1.6m, Revised Budget $1.2m)
The variance is favourable by $453k relates to higher debt recovery from ratepayers of $232k and cash contribution received for various oval maintenance of $237k.
Year to Date - (Actual $3.6m, Revised Budget $3.6m)
The variance is favourable by $23k but within the reporting threshold.
Expenses
Note 2 Employee Costs
Month to Date - (Actual $5.7m, Revised Budget $6.4m)
The favourable variance of $729k for the month is mainly attributable to staff vacancies with $62k related to underspent corporate training.
Year to Date - (Actual $30.1m, Revised Budget $32.4m)
The favourable variance of $2.3m mainly attributable to staff vacancies not been filled and $193k related to underspent corporate training.
It is worth noting that due to the delayed Salaried Officer Enterprise Bargaining, increases (including back pay) that would be applicable, have not been applied.
Note 3 Materials and Contracts
Month to Date - (Actual $6.6m, Revised Budget $6.3m)
The unfavourable variance of $337k is due to higher than anticipated Contract expenses of $795k offset by lower External Equipment Hire expenses of $165k, Material expenses of $89k, Audit Fee expenses of $80k, Consulting Fee expenses of $59k and Bulk Refuse Removal expenses of $56k.
Year to Date - (Actual $26.4m, Revised Budget $28.0m)
The favourable variance of $1.6m mainly relates to:
· Lower Consulting Fees of $848k due to underspend on various projects;
· Lower Refuse Removal expenses of $382k due to lower than expected collection of Waste tonnage;
· Lower External Equipment Hire expenses of $133k due to timing of Global Beats and Eats events;
· Lower Audit Fee expenses of $104k due to timing of billing; and
· Lower Sponsorship Fee of $67k.
Note 4 Insurance
Month to Date - (Actual $114k, Revised Budget $124k)
The favourable variance of $10k reflects improved claims experience.
Year to Date - (Actual $494k, Revised Budget $638k)
The favourable variance of $143k reflects improved claims experience.
Other Revenue & Expenses
Note 5 Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date – (Actual $2.0m, Revised Budget $1.1m)
The variance is favourable by $879k due to cash contribution related to deeds of agreement with developers for the Marmion Avenue extension project for $1.0m and partially offset by lower Commonwealth contribution to Road to Recovery Grants and Road Traffic Structures.
Year to Date – (Actual $7.2m, Revised Budget $5.9m)
The favourable variance of $1.3m predominantly relates to cash contribution related to deeds of agreement with developers for the Marmion Avenue extension project for $1.2m.
Note 6 Contributed Physical Assets
Month to Date – (Actual $1.3m, Revised Budget $6.8m)
The unfavourable variance of $5.5m is due to the phasing of the Budget. The anticipated asset handover was budgeted for November 2019, however it took place in October 2019 in a value of $3.8m. The actual asset recognition is recorded as and when assets are handed over to the City. This month pathways, drainage structures and pavements were handed over by developers to the City in a value of $1.3m.
Year to Date – (Actual $5.1m, Revised Budget $6.8m)
The unfavourable variance is due to lower than anticipated level of asset handover from developers.
Note 7-8 Profit / Loss on Asset Disposals
Month to Date – (Combined Actual $117k, Combined Revised Budget $15k)
The favourable variance is a result of profit adjustment relating to Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) lot sales.
Year to Date – (Combined Actual $189k, Combined Revised Budget $72k)
The favourable variance relates to profit adjustment to Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) lot sales.
Note 9 Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Revenues
Month to Date – (Actual $461m, Revised Budget $758k)
The unfavourable result is due to delay in receipt of headworks levy for Cell 4 and 8.
Year to Date – (Actual $4.5m, Revised Budget $5.5m)
The unfavourable variance of $1.1m relates to under receipts of headworks levy for Cells 5 and 6 and Yanchep/Two Rocks Community Contribution not yet received.
Note 10 Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Expenses
Month to Date – (Actual $64k, Revised Budget $51k)
The unfavourable result relates is due to Legal Fee Expenses for Cell 4 and 8.
Year to Date – (Actual $5.0m, Revised Budget $2.1m)
The unfavourable result is due to land acquisition for Cell 9 which offsets by deferral in contract expense for Woodvale Structure Plan by $600k and Cells 8 by $145k.
Statement of Financial Position (Attachment 2)
Note 1 - Net Current Assets
When compared to the opening position at 30 June 2019 Net Current Assets have increased by $66.6m which is predominately due to the impact of 2019/20 Rates and Waste Service Fees levied.
Within the Current Assets, Current Receivables of $63.6m are mainly comprised of collectable Rates and Waste Service Fees debtors of $56.0m and Emergency Services Levy of $2.1m, with the remaining balance attributed to General Debtors of $5.5m.
Note 2 - Non-Current Assets
Non-Current Assets as at 30 November 2019 have increased by $22.1m from 30 June 2019 Actuals. The movement is due to increase in Work in Progress of $39.1m partially offset by accumulated depreciation of $17.0m (estimated).
Note 3 - Non-Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities as at 30 November 2019 have increased by $4.8m due to change in the AASB (Australian Accounting Standards Board) Standard 15 for Revenue from Contracts with Customers which has resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions as liability when performance obligations have are not been met.
The existing loan with the Western Australia Treasury Corporation remains unchanged making up 81% of total Non-Current Liabilities.
Financial Performance Indicators
The table below presents data on relevant financial ratios, comparing the minimum standard expected as per the DLGSCI status at the beginning of the financial year, and year to date figures (where relevant).
A green highlight is used where the minimum standard is met or exceeded. Highlighted in red are below the standard for financial year end 30 June 2019.
DLGSCI - Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries
The following comments with regard to Ratios relates to the benchmarks not met for the period 30 June 2019.
Note 1 - Current Ratio
The Standard was not met primarily as a result of the internal restrictions of municipal funds. Most of the municipal funds are kept in special purpose cash backed Reserves.
Note 2 – Asset Sustainability Ratio
The DLGSCI Asset Management Framework and Guidelines publication provides the following explanation in respect to the Asset Sustainability Ratio (ASR):
"If capital expenditure on renewing or replacing assets is at least equal to depreciation on average over time, then the local government is ensuring the value of its existing stock of physical assets is maintained. If capital expenditure on existing assets is less than depreciation then, unless a local government’s overall asset stock is relatively new, it is likely that it is underspending on renewal or replacement."
A large percentage of the City's assets are in new to very good condition with approximately 85% of the total asset base at or below condition 2 (a rating of ‘0’ represents a new asset and a ‘10’ represents an asset that has failed). Less than 1% of the asset base is at or above condition 8, which represents assets that require intervention.
With the City's current mix of old and new assets and continued high growth, a lower than average ASR is expected, and the current condition of assets and level of renewal expenditure confirms this position. As the stock ages and renewal expenditure incrementally increases the ratio should increase, however continued growth may keep it relatively lower than the industry standard.
Taking a long term outlook, the level of asset stock and renewal demand necessitates the development of strategies to address the future impact and ensure that the City can continue to grow and maintain its assets in a financially sustainable manner. Given that renewal expenditure is lower than the depreciation being charged and that certain years’ experience significant spikes in demand, a specific Asset Renewal Reserve has been established.
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program is summarised by Sub-Program in the table below:
During November $7.1m was spent. Details of significant expenditure for the month are included in Attachment 3. As at 30 November 2019 the City has spent $34.3m, which represents 37.0% of the $92.9m budget.
The City forecasts spend of $86,254,731 which represents 96% of the 2019/20 management budget.
Note: Marmion Ave (PR-4140) had $5.9m endorsed by Council on 10 December which is not considered in the above statement, i.e. forecast spend is more in the region of 90%.
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information above, updates in key capital projects are selected to be specifically reported on, is provided in the Top Capital Projects attachment to this report (Attachment 4).
Investment Portfolio (Attachment 5)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (and per the City’s Investment Policy), the City invests solely in Authorised Deposit taking Institutions (ADIs):
At the end of November 2019, the City held an investment portfolio (cash & cash equivalents) of $425.5m (Face Value), equating to $430.2m inclusive of accrued interest. The City’s year to date investment portfolio return has exceeded the UBS Australia Bank Bill rate index benchmark by 0.52% pa (2.10% pa vs. 1.58% pa), however it is noted that Interest Earnings were budgeted at a 2.25% yield.
Rate Setting Statement (Attachment 6)
The Rate Setting Statement represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the Surplus/ (Deficit) based on the Revenues (excluding Rates), Expenses, Capital Works and Funding Movements, resulting in the Rating Income required. It is noted that the closing Surplus/ (Deficit) will balance to the reconciliation of Net Current Assets Surplus/ (Deficit) Carried Forward (detailed below):
*The change in the AASB Standard 15 has resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions received as a liability when performance obligations have not been met.
Consultation
This document has been prepared in consultation with Responsible Officers for review and analysis.
Comment
In reference to Statement of Comprehensive Income in the report, the following colours have been used to categorise three levels of variance:
Revenues:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red < -10%.
Expenses:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red < -10%.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Act and Regulations 34 (5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
The City informed the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (The Department) on the 3 December 2019 of the City’s inability to meet Regulations 34 (4) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires the Financial Activity Statement to be presented within 2 months after the end of the month to Council. The Department has acknowledged and noted the delay is due to the lack of a Council meeting in January 2020. The department also noted the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 do not prescribe a penalty for non-compliance with Regulation 34 (4) however, the matter may be raised by auditors during the City’s 2019-2020 audit.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
· Accounting Policy;
· Strategic Budget Policy; and
· Investment Policy.
Financial Implications
As outlined in the report and detailed in Attachments 1 to 6.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:
1. RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statement and commentaries on variances year to date Budget for the period ended 30 November 2019 consisting of:
a) November 2019 year to date Actuals;
b) November 2019 year to date Statement of Financial Position and Net Current Assets; and
c) November 2019 year to date Material Financial Variance Notes.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Statement of Comprehensive Income November 2019 |
19/487691 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Statement of Financial Position November 2019 |
19/487699 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Significant Capital Expenditure November 2019 |
19/487711 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Investment Report November 2019 |
19/484076 |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Top Projects 2019-20 - November 2019 - 20191209 |
16/151914[v44] |
Minuted |
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Rate Setting Statement November 2019 |
19/491103 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 535
File Ref: 30724V05 – 20/8604
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
To consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 December 2019.
Background
In accordance with Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
“Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. For the 2019/20 financial year the statement of financial activity will be presented by nature and type.
Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2019/20 financial year 10% and a value greater than $100,000 will be used for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
Council adopted the Annual Budget for the 2019-20 financial year on 28 June 2019 (SCS01-06/19). The figures in this report are compared to the Adopted Budget.
Comments Month-to-Date
The Financial Activity Statement report for the month of December 2019 shows an overall unfavourable variance from Operations before Other Revenue & Expenses of $58k.
The unfavourable variance is due to lower Operating Revenue, underspend in Employment Costs and Materials and Contracts expenses.
Comments Year-to-Date
The Financial Activity Statement report for the year-to-date of December 2019 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations before Other Revenue & Expenses of $4.1m.
The favourable variance is due to underspend in Employment Costs and Materials and Contracts expenses.
Results from Operations
Capital Program
Overall Comments on Year-to-Date (YTD) Figures
Results from Operations
Capital Program
Investment Portfolio Performance
Detailed Analysis of Statement of Comprehensive Income (Attachment 1)
Comments relating to the Statement of Comprehensive Income are provided under the following two sections:
a) Current month comparison of Actuals to Budgets; and
b) Year to date of Actuals to Budgets
where the variance is higher than reporting threshold or item of interest to Council.
Revenues
Note 1 Rates
Month to Date - (Actual $229k, Revised Budget $400k)
The variance is unfavourable by $171k relates to delay in generating Interim Rates.
Year to Date - (Actual $133.2m, Revised Budget $133.7m)
The variance is unfavourable by $452k as noted above but within the reporting threshold.
Note 2 Fees and Charges
Month to Date - (Actual $1.2m, Revised Budget $1.6)
The variance is unfavourable by $341k relates to reduced Facility Booking Fees Income, User Entry Fees, Application Licence Permit Fee Income, Inspection Fee Income due to reduced activity due to public holidays.
Year to Date - (Actual $38.5m, Revised Budget $38.7m)
The variance is unfavourable by $174k but within the reporting threshold.
Expenses
Note 3 Employee Costs
Month to Date - (Actual $6.1m, Revised Budget $6.1m)
The favourable variance of $65k for the month is mainly attributable to staff vacancies.
Year to Date - (Actual $36.2m, Revised Budget $38.5m)
The favourable variance of $2.3m mainly attributable to staff vacancies not been filled and $183k related to underspent corporate training.
Note 4 Materials and Contracts
Month to Date - (Actual $5.0m, Revised Budget $5.5m)
The favourable variance of $467k is due to lower than anticipated Refuse Removal expenses of $202k, Contract expenses of $136k, Material expenses of $63k and External Printing Expenses of $67k.
Year to Date - (Actual $31.4m, Revised Budget $33.4m)
The favourable variance of $2.0m mainly relates to:
· Lower Consulting Fees of $945k due to underspend on various projects;
· Lower Refuse Removal expenses of $584k due to lower than expected collection of Waste tonnage;
· Lower Material expenses of $106k;
· Lower Audit Fee expenses of $89k due to timing of billing;
· Lower Sponsorship Fee of $83k;
· Lower Postage expenses of $78k; and
· Various other expenses of 115k.
Note 5 Insurance
Month to Date - (Actual $91k, Revised Budget $125k)
The favourable variance of $34k reflects improved claims experience.
Year to Date - (Actual $585k, Revised Budget $762k)
The favourable variance of $177k reflects improved claims experience.
Other Revenue & Expenses
Note 6 Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date – (Actual $67k, Revised Budget $430k)
The variance is unfavourable by $363k due to delay in receiving grants along with the return of grant funds due to significant savings from the Franklin Road project.
Year to Date – (Actual $7.3m, Revised Budget $6.3m)
The favourable variance of $953k predominantly relates to cash contribution related to deeds of agreement with developers for the Marmion Avenue extension project for $1.3m and offset by $464k due to delay in receiving grants for road resurfacing and Kingsway Olympic Grandstand.
Note 7 Contributed Physical Assets
Month to Date – (Actual $0, Revised Budget $1.4m)
The unfavourable variance of $1.4m is due to the phasing of the Budget. The anticipated asset handover was budgeted for December 2019. However the actual asset recognition is recorded as and when assets are handed over to the City.
Year to Date – (Actual $5.2m, Revised Budget $8.1m)
The unfavourable variance is due to lower than anticipated level of asset handover from developers.
Note 8-9 Profit / Loss on Asset Disposals
Month to Date – (Combined Actual $164k, Combined Revised Budget $15k)
The favourable variance is a result of profit adjustment relating to Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) lot sales.
Year to Date – (Combined Actual $353k, Combined Revised Budget $87k)
The favourable variance relates to profit adjustment to Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) lot sales.
Note 10 Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Revenues
Month to Date – (Actual $1.7m, Revised Budget $319k)
The favourable result is due receipt of headworks levy for Cell 8, and receipt of income for sale of land for Cell 5 and 6.
Year to Date – (Actual $6.2m, Revised Budget $5.8m)
The favourable variance of $311k relates to receipt of headworks levy for Cell 6 and 9 and Interest Income.
Note 11 Town Planning Scheme (TPS) Expenses
Month to Date – (Actual $85k, Revised Budget $1.0m)
The favourable result relates to delay in contract expenses for Cell 8 and 9.
Year to Date – (Actual $5.0m, Revised Budget $3.1m)
The unfavourable result is due to land acquisition for Cell 9 which offsets by deferral in contract expense for Woodvale Structure Plan by $600k and Cells 8 by $289k.
Statement of Financial Position (Attachment 2)
Note 1 - Net Current Assets
When compared to the opening position at 30 June 2019 Net Current Assets have increased by $54.5m which is predominately due to the impact of 2019/20 Rates and Waste Service Fees levied.
Within the Current Assets, Current Receivables of $58.4m are mainly comprised of collectable Rates and Waste Service Fees debtors of $49.5m and Emergency Services Levy of $1.9m, with the remaining balance attributed to General Debtors of $7.0m.
Note 2 - Non-Current Assets
Non-Current Assets as at 31 December 2019 have increased by $23.5m from 30 June 2019 Actuals. The movement is due to increase in Work in Progress of $43.7m partially offset by accumulated depreciation of $20.5m (estimated).
Note 3 - Non-Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities as at 31 December 2019 have increased by $5.5m due to change in the AASB (Australian Accounting Standards Board) Standard 15 for Revenue from Contracts with Customers which has resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions as liability when performance obligations have are not been met.
The existing loan with the Western Australia Treasury Corporation remains unchanged making up 81% of total Non-Current Liabilities.
Financial Performance Indicators
The table below presents data on relevant financial ratios, comparing the minimum standard expected as per the DLGSCI status at the beginning of the financial year, and year to date figures (where relevant).
A green highlight is used where the minimum standard is met or exceeded. Highlighted in red are below the standard for financial year end 30 June 2019.
DLGSCI - Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries
The following comments with regard to Ratios relates to the benchmarks not met for the period 30 June 2019.
Note 1 - Current Ratio
The Standard was not met primarily as a result of the internal restrictions of municipal funds. Most of the municipal funds are kept in special purpose cash backed Reserves.
Note 2 – Asset Sustainability Ratio
The DLGSCI Asset Management Framework and Guidelines publication provides the following explanation in respect to the Asset Sustainability Ratio (ASR):
"If capital expenditure on renewing or replacing assets is at least equal to depreciation on average over time, then the local government is ensuring the value of its existing stock of physical assets is maintained. If capital expenditure on existing assets is less than depreciation then, unless a local government’s overall asset stock is relatively new, it is likely that it is underspending on renewal or replacement."
A large percentage of the City's assets are in new to very good condition with approximately 85% of the total asset base at or below condition 2 (a rating of ‘0’ represents a new asset and a ‘10’ represents an asset that has failed). Less than 1% of the asset base is at or above condition 8, which represents assets that require intervention.
With the City's current mix of old and new assets and continued high growth, a lower than average ASR is expected, and the current condition of assets and level of renewal expenditure confirms this position. As the stock ages and renewal expenditure incrementally increases the ratio should increase, however continued growth may keep it relatively lower than the industry standard.
Taking a long term outlook, the level of asset stock and renewal demand necessitates the development of strategies to address the future impact and ensure that the City can continue to grow and maintain its assets in a financially sustainable manner. Given that renewal expenditure is lower than the depreciation being charged and that certain years’ experience significant spikes in demand, a specific Asset Renewal Reserve has been established.
Capital Works Program
The current status of the Capital Works Program is summarised by Sub-Program in the table below:
During December $4.7m was spent. Details of significant expenditure for the month are included in Attachment 3. As at 31 December 2019 the City has spent $39.0m, which represents 39.5% of the $98.8m budget.
The City forecasts spend of $89,515,898 which represents 90% of the 2019/20 management budget. Commitments as at 31 December were $19.2m. This amount together with the year to date actual equates to 58.8% of the capital budget.
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information above, updates in key capital projects are selected to be specifically reported on, is provided in the Top Capital Projects attachment to this report (Attachment 4).
Investment Portfolio (Attachment 5)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (and per the City’s Investment Policy), the City invests solely in Authorised Deposit taking Institutions (ADIs):
At the end of December 2019, the City held an investment portfolio (cash & cash equivalents) of $409.2m (Face Value), equating to $413.4m inclusive of accrued interest. The City’s year to date investment portfolio return has exceeded the UBS Australia Bank Bill rate index benchmark by 0.53% pa (2.03% pa vs. 1.50% pa), however it is noted that Interest Earnings were budgeted at a 2.25% yield.
Rate Setting Statement (Attachment 6)
The Rate Setting Statement represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the Surplus/ (Deficit) based on the Revenues (excluding Rates), Expenses, Capital Works and Funding Movements, resulting in the Rating Income required. It is noted that the closing Surplus/ (Deficit) will balance to the reconciliation of Net Current Assets Surplus/ (Deficit) Carried Forward (detailed below):
*The change in the AASB Standard 15 has resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions received as a liability when performance obligations have not been met.
Consultation
This document has been prepared in consultation with Responsible Officers for review and analysis.
Comment
In reference to Statement of Comprehensive Income in the report, the following colours have been used to categorise three levels of variance:
Revenues:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red < -10%.
Expenses:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red < -10%.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Act and Regulations 34 (5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
· Accounting Policy;
· Strategic Budget Policy; and
· Investment Policy.
Financial Implications
As outlined in the report and detailed in Attachments 1 to 6.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:
1. RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statement and commentaries on variances year to date Budget for the period ended 31 December 2019 consisting of:
a) December 2019 year to date Actuals;
b) December 2019 year to date Statement of Financial Position and Net Current Assets; and
c) December 2019 year to date Material Financial Variance Notes.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Statement of Comprehensive Income December 2019 |
20/22887 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Statement of Financial Position December 2019 |
20/12106 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Significant Capital Expenditure December 2019 |
20/11206 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Top Projects 2019-20 - December 2019 |
16/151914[v45] |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Investment Report December 2019 |
20/11186 |
Minuted |
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Rate Setting Statement December 2019 |
20/22908 |
Minuted |
Transactional Finance
File Ref: 1859V02 – 20/707
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of December 2019, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in December 2019: -
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – December 2019 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Manual Journal Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
118514 - 118726 3698 - 3715 |
$602,628.15 $22,897,925.75 $23,500,553.90
$1,542.50 ($16,278.17) ($66,950.94) ($23,418,867.29) |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – December 2019 Advance Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$23,418,867.29 $0.00 $3,597,511.91 $27,016,379.20 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – December 2019 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$2,381.30 $2,381.30 $2,990.90 $36,490.92 $5,891.30 $2,381.30 $2,381.30 $9,671.30 $2,381.32 $66,950.94 |
At the close of December 2019 outstanding creditors amounted to $862,523.26.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payment (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of December 2019 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.3 Progressive Organisation
4.3.2 Ensure excellence in our customer service”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of December 2019, as summarised below: -
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – December 2019 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Manual Journal Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
118514 - 118726 3698 - 3715 |
$602,628.15 $22,897,925.75 $23,500,553.90
$1,542.50 ($16,278.17) ($66,950.94) ($23,418,867.29) |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – December 2019 Advance Recoup Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$23,418,867.29 $0.00 $3,597,511.91 $27,016,379.20 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – December 2019 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$2,381.30 $2,381.30 $2,990.90 $36,490.92 $5,891.30 $2,381.30 $2,381.30 $9,671.30 $2,381.32 $64,950.94 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS DECEMBER 2019 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00118514 |
03/12/2019 |
Joseph Banks Secondary College P & C |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118515 |
03/12/2019 |
Kristy Chrystal |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118516 |
03/12/2019 |
Sara Tawfik |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118517 |
03/12/2019 |
Susara Scheffer |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118518 |
03/12/2019 |
RunEtics Running Club |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118519 |
03/12/2019 |
Ngoc Tram Hong |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118520 |
03/12/2019 |
Fatima Payman |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118521 |
03/12/2019 |
Wanneroo Civic Choir Incorporated |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118522 |
03/12/2019 |
Prashant Jagdish Jaiswal |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118523 |
03/12/2019 |
Courtney Hetherington |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118524 |
03/12/2019 |
Lisa Young |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118525 |
03/12/2019 |
Brendon Bidwell |
$256.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Rejected |
|
|
00118526 |
03/12/2019 |
Courtney Hetherington |
$80.40 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118527 |
03/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$641.49 |
|
00118528 |
03/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$641.49 |
|
00118529 |
03/12/2019 |
Eview Group Julie Ormston & Partner |
$21.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Cancelled |
|
|
00118530 |
03/12/2019 |
Mellissa Gomez |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118531 |
03/12/2019 |
Eview Group Julie Ormston & Partner |
$21.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00118532 |
03/12/2019 |
Tracey Mohen |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118533 |
03/12/2019 |
My Chu Truong |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00118534 |
03/12/2019 |
Umair Ahmed |
$30.73 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business Registration |
|
|
00118535 |
03/12/2019 |
Kristie Ellis |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Exempt |
|
|
00118536 |
03/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$2,888.37 |
|
00118537 |
03/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$1,711.70 |
|
00118538 |
03/12/2019 |
Satterley |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Bond Assessment Fee - Change In Schedule Fee |
|
|
00118539 |
03/12/2019 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00118540 |
03/12/2019 |
Joondalup Community Mental Health Services |
$416.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Meeting Room Hire - Cancel |
|
|
00118541 |
03/12/2019 |
Luke Ferre |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118542 |
03/12/2019 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118543 |
03/12/2019 |
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$2,801.01 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Land Not Released |
|
|
00118544 |
03/12/2019 |
Water Corporation |
$1,415.90 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
00118545 |
03/12/2019 |
Telstra |
$11,119.08 |
|
|
|
ADSL - Mens Shed - IT |
|
|
|
|
Relocation Works - Quinns Rocks Drainage - Assets |
|
|
00118546 |
03/12/2019 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$139.35 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118547 |
03/12/2019 |
Community Planning & Development Petty Cash |
$155.65 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118548 |
03/12/2019 |
Assets Petty Cash |
$185.60 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118549 |
03/12/2019 |
Building Development Group Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118550 |
03/12/2019 |
Shire of Murray |
$20,035.00 |
|
|
|
Long Service Liability - R Peake - Payroll |
|
|
00118551 |
10/12/2019 |
S Sivaraj |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118552 |
10/12/2019 |
St Andrew's Catholic Church |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118553 |
10/12/2019 |
North Coast Rugby Union Junior Football |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118554 |
10/12/2019 |
Jayden Perez |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118555 |
10/12/2019 |
Ala'a Alrikabi |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118556 |
10/12/2019 |
Chirag Vakharia |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118557 |
10/12/2019 |
Rocky Dean Iemma |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118558 |
10/12/2019 |
Vicki Reynolds |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118559 |
10/12/2019 |
Monaz Kasad |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118560 |
10/12/2019 |
Devco Holdings |
$61.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Cancelled |
|
|
00118561 |
10/12/2019 |
Vespoli Constructions Pty Ltd |
$61.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - BSL Not Applicable |
|
|
00118562 |
10/12/2019 |
Stephen Joseph Scott |
$74.40 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00118563 |
10/12/2019 |
Amy Tremain |
$147.60 |
|
|
|
Refund - Skin Penetration Inspection Fee - Cancelled |
|
|
00118564 |
10/12/2019 |
Maria Cruz |
$147.60 |
|
|
|
Refund - Skin Penetration Inspection Fee - Cancelled |
|
|
00118565 |
10/12/2019 |
Catherine Cullinane |
$30.55 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business Notification Fee - Not Required |
|
|
00118566 |
10/12/2019 |
Macey Simpkins |
$42.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Overpaid - Already Registered |
|
|
00118567 |
10/12/2019 |
Alexandra Starr-Barnes |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Overpaid |
|
|
00118568 |
10/12/2019 |
Debra Cuff |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118569 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$610.40 |
|
00118570 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$679.18 |
|
00118571 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
00118572 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$584.61 |
|
00118573 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$696.37 |
|
00118574 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$99.18 |
|
00118575 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$610.40 |
|
00118576 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$567.42 |
|
00118577 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$688.44 |
|
00118578 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
00118579 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$498.64 |
|
00118580 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$629.57 |
|
00118581 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$2,710.41 |
|
00118582 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$631.58 |
|
00118583 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
00118584 |
10/12/2019 |
Kennith Ernst |
$66.24 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Cancelled |
|
|
00118585 |
10/12/2019 |
Adib Nasari |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118586 |
10/12/2019 |
AC & RJ Cresswell |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118587 |
10/12/2019 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00118588 |
10/12/2019 |
Deng Agany |
$455.75 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118589 |
10/12/2019 |
Marie Cortes |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118590 |
10/12/2019 |
Australia Karen Organization WA Incorporated |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118591 |
10/12/2019 |
Adele Longworth |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118592 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$541.62 |
|
00118593 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$576.01 |
|
00118594 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$747.96 |
|
00118595 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$601.80 |
|
00118596 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$494.00 |
|
00118597 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$533.03 |
|
00118598 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$498.64 |
|
00118599 |
10/12/2019 |
DADAA Limited |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118600 |
10/12/2019 |
Jasmine Jasmine |
$21.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Paid Twice |
|
|
00118601 |
10/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$1,444.29 |
|
00118602 |
10/12/2019 |
Richard Pickerill |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118603 |
10/12/2019 |
Ruth Read |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118604 |
10/12/2019 |
Jennifer Lowthorpe |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Aquamotion Membership - Moved |
|
|
00118605 |
10/12/2019 |
Alex O'Neill |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118606 |
10/12/2019 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$64.70 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118607 |
10/12/2019 |
Hainsworth Youth Services Petty Cash |
$226.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118608 |
10/12/2019 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$192.70 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118609 |
10/12/2019 |
Water Corporation |
$1,417.08 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
00118610 |
10/12/2019 |
Telstra |
$28.99 |
|
|
|
Civic Centre Visitor System - IT |
|
|
00118611 |
10/12/2019 |
Disco Cantito Association |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00118612 |
10/12/2019 |
Mr Curtis Butcher |
$255.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Austswim Renewal To Maintain Current Roll |
|
|
00118613 |
10/12/2019 |
Ellenbrook Football Club |
$137.50 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher X 1 Child |
|
|
00118614 |
10/12/2019 |
First Homebuilders Pty Ltd |
$2,100.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Verge Bond - Overpaid |
|
|
00118615 |
10/12/2019 |
Miss Rachel Cooper |
$255.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Austswim Renewal To Maintain Current Roll - Aquamotion |
|
|
00118616 |
10/12/2019 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$4,435.74 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00118617 |
10/12/2019 |
Cr X Nguyen |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00118618 |
10/12/2019 |
Chung Wah Association |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Deposit - Chung Wah Dance Performance 26.01.2020 - Communication & Events |
|
|
00118619 |
10/12/2019 |
CPA Australia |
$3,600.00 |
|
|
|
CPA Australia Membership - 5 Members - Finance |
|
|
00118620 |
10/12/2019 |
Lewis Winter |
$925.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Emergency Management Awareness - Fire Services |
|
|
00118621 |
10/12/2019 |
Louisa Jane Holdings Pty Ltd |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
ATM Trailer For Dogs Breakfast - Events |
|
|
00118622 |
10/12/2019 |
Meridian Aluminium Pty Ltd |
$6,341.24 |
|
|
|
Balcony Door Works - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre - Projects |
|
|
00118623 |
10/12/2019 |
Repco |
$138.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
00118624 |
10/12/2019 |
Rexel Electrical Supplies Pty Ltd |
$15.44 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00118625 |
10/12/2019 |
Social Pinpoint |
$3,168.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription - 2 Projects - Community And Place |
|
|
00118626 |
10/12/2019 |
Subaru and VW Osborne Park |
$36,995.45 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Subaru Forester - Fleet Assets |
|
|
00118627 |
10/12/2019 |
West Australian Newspapers Ltd |
$106.80 |
|
|
|
Newspaper Subscription - 12.09.2019 - 05.12.2019 - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
00118628 |
13/12/2019 |
Samuel Neale |
$974.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Building Practitioner Registration |
|
|
00118629 |
16/12/2019 |
The Trustee For Pensuin Island Unit |
$2,493.20 |
|
|
|
Penguin Island Cruise - 18.12.2019 - Gold Program |
|
|
00118630 |
17/12/2019 |
Leroy Du Plessis |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118631 |
17/12/2019 |
Steven Ryder |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118632 |
17/12/2019 |
Stewart Burns |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118633 |
17/12/2019 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Recreation Association |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118634 |
17/12/2019 |
Eugene Whitehorn |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118635 |
17/12/2019 |
Marta Mitias |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118636 |
17/12/2019 |
The Spiritual Assembly Of The Baha'is Of Wanneroo |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118637 |
17/12/2019 |
Gary Payne |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118638 |
17/12/2019 |
Akash Joshi |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118639 |
17/12/2019 |
Gordana Nelkoski |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118640 |
17/12/2019 |
Organisation of African Community in WA Incorporated |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118641 |
17/12/2019 |
Rainbow Community Church Incorporated |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118642 |
17/12/2019 |
Aurelia Kolecki |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118643 |
17/12/2019 |
Julie Payne |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118644 |
17/12/2019 |
Juiliana Scaravilli |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118645 |
17/12/2019 |
Harish Bhudia |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118646 |
17/12/2019 |
Sarah Sulon |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118647 |
17/12/2019 |
Sunaina Dhanjal |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118648 |
17/12/2019 |
Casey McNamara |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118649 |
17/12/2019 |
Lauren Best |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118650 |
17/12/2019 |
Natalee Kelly |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Cat Registration Refund - Reside In City Of Joondalup |
|
|
00118651 |
17/12/2019 |
Sandra McCormick-Smith |
$51.66 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118652 |
17/12/2019 |
Dennella Petera |
$130.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118653 |
17/12/2019 |
Stewart Allen |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
00118654 |
17/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$696.37 |
|
00118655 |
17/12/2019 |
Sonja Holley |
$1.25 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Online Payment |
|
|
00118656 |
17/12/2019 |
Memik Pirbudak |
$295.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application - Withdrawn |
|
|
00118657 |
17/12/2019 |
Emily Richards |
$295.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Skin Penetration Application - Not Required |
|
|
00118658 |
17/12/2019 |
Kaz Chludzinski |
$85.24 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00118659 |
17/12/2019 |
Elwyn Hawthorn |
$74.32 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Request Cancelled |
|
|
00118660 |
17/12/2019 |
Sabeel Corporation Pty Ltd |
$53.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00118661 |
17/12/2019 |
Shaelan Pty Ltd |
$164.60 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Overpayment |
|
|
00118662 |
17/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$22.96 |
|
00118663 |
17/12/2019 |
Grow WA |
$125.30 |
|
|
|
Refund - Hire Fees - Butler Community Centre |
|
|
00118664 |
17/12/2019 |
Team Connect |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118665 |
17/12/2019 |
Lisa Fraser |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118666 |
17/12/2019 |
Binesh Hirji Pindoria |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118667 |
17/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$423.51 |
|
00118668 |
17/12/2019 |
Pattersons Insurebuild |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application - Exempt |
|
|
00118669 |
17/12/2019 |
Hussein & Nadia Samardali |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118670 |
17/12/2019 |
Nikita Woolley |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118671 |
17/12/2019 |
Mylles & Jayne Bates |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
00118672 |
17/12/2019 |
Tayla Charlton |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118673 |
17/12/2019 |
Joanne Crook |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118674 |
17/12/2019 |
Ryan Hartmann |
$34.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118675 |
17/12/2019 |
Gillian Gauntlett |
$188.30 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118676 |
17/12/2019 |
HW Gerges |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118677 |
17/12/2019 |
Russell McCarthy |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118678 |
17/12/2019 |
David Ian McNally |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118679 |
17/12/2019 |
Robert Agacy |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00118680 |
17/12/2019 |
Karis Clements |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
00118681 |
17/12/2019 |
Robin Shaw |
$32.58 |
|
|
|
Refund - Additional Bin Collection - Service Completed |
|
|
00118682 |
17/12/2019 |
Kerry Brogden |
$342.10 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Mowing Incident - Houghton Park |
|
|
00118683 |
17/12/2019 |
Start Right Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118684 |
17/12/2019 |
Charlotte Whyatt |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118685 |
17/12/2019 |
Activ Foundation Incorporated |
$643.09 |
|
|
|
Refund - Account Overpayment - Property |
|
|
00118686 |
17/12/2019 |
Gypsy Wilson |
$32.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Trading Licence Fee - Cancelled |
|
|
00118687 |
17/12/2019 |
June Reith |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Christmas Lights - Gold Program |
|
|
00118688 |
17/12/2019 |
Luke Calleja |
$489.30 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gym Membership - Cancelled |
|
|
00118689 |
17/12/2019 |
Erin Carruthers |
$24.88 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Aquamotion |
|
|
00118690 |
17/12/2019 |
Aneesah Evans |
$38.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118691 |
17/12/2019 |
Sarah Mihic |
$315.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Kingsway Indoor Stadium Junior Clinic Programs - Cancelled |
|
|
00118692 |
17/12/2019 |
Cristian Moraru |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118693 |
17/12/2019 |
City of Wanneroo |
$720.00 |
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Vouchers For Employee Retirement |
|
|
00118694 |
17/12/2019 |
Community History Centre Petty Cash |
$48.55 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118695 |
17/12/2019 |
Water Corporation |
$7,753.92 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
00118696 |
17/12/2019 |
Telstra |
$51,633.54 |
|
|
|
Integrated Messaging - IT |
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00118697 |
17/12/2019 |
Kingsway Stadium Petty Cash |
$209.35 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118698 |
17/12/2019 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$498.25 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00118699 |
17/12/2019 |
Mrs Julie McDonald |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Austswim Course To Maintain Current Role - Aquamotion |
|
|
00118700 |
17/12/2019 |
Ben Trager Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00118701 |
17/12/2019 |
Maggies Netball Club |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher - 1 Child |
|
|
00118702 |
18/12/2019 |
Northside Baptist Church |
$61.43 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118704 |
18/12/2019 |
City of Wanneroo |
$1,330.00 |
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Morning Tea - Resignation Of Employee |
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Employee Retirement Gift & Morning Tea |
|
|
00118703 |
13/12/2019 |
Watson Property Group |
$132,926.75 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund Subdivision Bond Refund - Chianti Estate Stage 4 Wetland Buffer Woodvale |
|
|
00118705 |
18/12/2019 |
Wanneroo Branch ALP |
$25.05 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00118706 |
18/12/2019 |
Rates Refund |
$1,776.06 |
|
00118707 |
18/12/2019 |
A & S Butcher |
$3,190.00 |
|
|
|
Fit Roller Blinds - Yanchep Beach Road - Place Management |
|
|
00118708 |
18/12/2019 |
Achievability Pty Ltd |
$14,300.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Accessibility Information 01.05.2020 - Projects |
|
|
00118709 |
18/12/2019 |
Arrow Computers |
$207.00 |
|
|
|
3 Badgy Cartridges - Fire Services |
|
|
00118710 |
18/12/2019 |
Bell Fire Equipment Company Pty Ltd |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00118711 |
18/12/2019 |
CA Technology Pty Ltd |
$99,071.50 |
|
|
|
Camms Software Purchase - Cammsstrategy & Cammsengage - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
Project Commencement Services - 25% - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
00118712 |
18/12/2019 |
Corpvote Pty Ltd |
$4,427.06 |
|
|
|
Provision Of Electronic Voting Services - People & Culture |
|
|
00118713 |
18/12/2019 |
Critical Fire Protection & Training |
$847.00 |
|
|
|
Fire Protection Works - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
00118714 |
18/12/2019 |
Economic Development Australia Limited |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Corporate Membership - 31.12.2019 - 31.12.2020 - Economic Development |
|
|
00118715 |
18/12/2019 |
Gartner Australasia Pty Ltd |
$26,180.00 |
|
|
|
Membership - HR Leadership - 01.2020 - 12.2020 |
|
|
00118716 |
18/12/2019 |
Get Home Safe Limited |
$684.68 |
|
|
|
Monthly Software Subscriptions Get Home Safe - People And Culture |
|
|
00118717 |
18/12/2019 |
Lexis Nexis |
$12,589.57 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - Advanced Package - Legal Services |
|
|
00118718 |
18/12/2019 |
Light Application Pty Ltd |
$10,703.74 |
|
|
|
Install Phillips Dynalite System Manager Software - Projects |
|
|
00118719 |
18/12/2019 |
Logiudice Property Group |
$732.05 |
|
|
|
Quarterly Admin/Reserve Fund Levy - Mindarie Medical Centre - Property |
|
|
00118720 |
18/12/2019 |
Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$4,818.00 |
|
|
|
Provision Services - Position Reviews - People & Culture |
|
|
00118721 |
18/12/2019 |
Northside Nissan (1986) Pty Ltd |
$48,788.41 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle - Nissan Leaf - Fleet Assets |
|
|
00118722 |
18/12/2019 |
Repco |
$59.32 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00118723 |
18/12/2019 |
Snake Tails Reptile Rescue |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Snake Removal - Community Safety |
|
|
00118724 |
18/12/2019 |
WA Structural Consulting Engineers |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Floodlight Pole Review - Ridgewood - Projects |
|
|
00118725 |
18/12/2019 |
Wacker Neuson Pty Ltd |
$3,510.65 |
|
|
|
Vibratory Rammer - Fleet Assets |
|
|
00118726 |
18/12/2019 |
Wespray on Paving Pty Ltd |
$2,862.20 |
|
|
|
Concrete Painting And Stencil Work - Edgar Griffiths Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$602,628.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00003699 |
02/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Pavilion Mindarie |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
|
Balance Of Payment - Christmas Party 05.12.2019 - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003700 |
03/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$19,313.49 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003701 |
03/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Active Discovery |
$152,318.39 |
|
|
|
Limestone Replacement - Beelara Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Covent Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Apparel |
$2,453.55 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Spatial Technologies |
$4,272.40 |
|
|
|
Autocad Annual Subscription - IT |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$18,047.44 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
A-Flex Technology (NZ) Ltd |
$115.50 |
|
|
|
Pressure Gauge - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Allstamps |
$118.05 |
|
|
|
Stamps For Library - Library |
|
|
|
|
Allused Pty Ltd |
$4,180.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Rake Bucket - Yard Loader - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Alphazeta |
$3,850.00 |
|
|
|
Fire Safety Assessment - Alexander Heights Community Buildings - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Anstat Pty Ltd |
$308.55 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Australia New Food Standards - Health |
|
|
|
|
Aquatic One |
$4,235.00 |
|
|
|
Contract Administration - Kingsway Water Play Space - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$242.13 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Aslab Pty Ltd |
$847.00 |
|
|
|
Compaction Test - Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$1,037.52 |
|
|
|
Polarised Glasses - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Aurora Environmental Perth |
$3,564.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - Hudson Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Austraffic WA |
$902.00 |
|
|
|
Traffic Survey - Gnangara Road - Transport & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$400.40 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Property Consultants |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Update To Market Rent Assessment - Property |
|
|
|
|
Consultancy - Kiosk At Aquamotion - Property |
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty Ltd |
$2,090.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Rigging & Dogging Courses - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Autosmart North Metro Perth |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Floor Smart Cleanse - Stores |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$241.38 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$372.01 |
|
|
|
Printroom Supplies - Paper |
|
|
|
|
Barra Civil & Fencing |
$5,021.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Fencing - Neville/Crivelli/Brolo Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Gate - Elliot Road Tennis Courts - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$1,467.50 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Floodlight Design - Heath Park Eglinton - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$896.23 |
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Yanchep Beach Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Banner Mesh Removal - Edgar Griffiths Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$691.90 |
|
|
|
100 X Flash Drives - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$58.08 |
|
|
|
Industrial Nitrogen D2 - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$2,368.10 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bosston Auto Bodies |
$1,199.97 |
|
|
|
Aluminium Bar - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Repair Central Locking - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$3,504.86 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$2,973.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
BurkeAir Pty Ltd |
$22,689.04 |
|
|
|
Replace Chiller - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Capital Finance Australia Limited |
$993.76 |
|
|
|
Spin Bikes Rental - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$1,430.74 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,003.10 |
|
|
|
Dell Latitude Laptop - IT |
|
|
|
|
Chemical Essentials Pty Ltd |
$1,466.30 |
|
|
|
Disinfectant - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$2,098.92 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cleartech Waste Management Pty Ltd |
$354.75 |
|
|
|
Empty Drums Collection - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$174.20 |
|
|
|
Beverages For Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Community Greenwaste Recycling Pty Ltd |
$350.02 |
|
|
|
Material Disposal - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Computer Badge Embroidery |
$84.72 |
|
|
|
Badges - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Contra-Flow Pty Ltd |
$915.85 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control - Gnangara - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Convic Design Pty Ltd |
$18,260.00 |
|
|
|
Design Of Yanchep Skate Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Scorecard |
$1,290.52 |
|
|
|
Financial Assessments - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,872.93 |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
50 Orange Traffic Cones - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Wanneroo Showground - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Slashing In Progress - Parks |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$26,020.78 |
|
|
|
Court Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Davson & Ward Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Quantity Surveying - Belhaven Reserve - Projects |
|
|
|
|
DBS Fencing |
$555.28 |
|
|
|
Pine Rails - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas |
$187.02 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Digital Education Services |
$624.09 |
|
|
|
Supply Of DVD Stock For Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$134,315.24 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Strand Way - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Footpath Replacement - Talara Circuit - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Concrete - Edgar Griffiths - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Install Footpath - Blackmore Avenue - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$32,286.10 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping - Yanchep Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Drainage Cleaning - Alkimos - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$1,511.16 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$8,519.75 |
|
|
|
Design Irrigation System - Splendid Skate Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Email Media |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Natural Areas Asset Planning Officer - Asset Planning |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Associates |
$3,960.00 |
|
|
|
Design - Splendid Park Cycling Facility - Facilities Planning |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$155,667.88 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Upgrade Passive Park - Lynton Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$8,800.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Consulting Services - Girrawheen CCTV Report - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Consulting Services - Girrawheen Hub - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Gaia's Organic Gardens |
$1,750.00 |
|
|
|
Organic Garden Activities - Dog's Breakfast 2019 - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Gen Connect Pty Ltd |
$376.20 |
|
|
|
Service Report - Emergency Power Generator - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$45,430.00 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Party Hire |
$420.00 |
|
|
|
Marquee Hire - Relay For Life Event |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$313.50 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Tallybont Bend - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,140.65 |
|
|
|
Nurses For Immunisation - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$332.42 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$13,845.70 |
|
|
|
Repair Limestone Header - Hacienda & Jack Barlow Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Limestone Piers - Cormoran Glade - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Repair Feature Wall - Brampton Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$33.97 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$4,717.79 |
|
|
|
Concrete Pipes - Rangeview Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$35,278.42 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$4,613.00 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$4,315.70 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$1,716.15 |
|
|
|
Stock For Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Jackson McDonald |
$19,800.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$1,391.18 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$5,694.26 |
|
|
|
Pressure Wash Paving - Ridgewood Lake - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Pressure Clean Pavement - Ocean Keys - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Pressure Clean Surface For Linemarking - Yanchep Sporting Complex - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Konnect (Coventry Fasteners) |
$65.70 |
|
|
|
Consumables - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$685.19 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$96,527.87 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals Australia WA |
$820.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Report Writing For Local Government - 1 Attendee - Financial & Strategic Accounting |
|
|
|
|
Mad Tatters Morris |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Dance Performance - Kingsway - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,877.74 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$3,566.23 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,843.84 |
|
|
|
480 Bin Lids - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$15,422.00 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$87.12 |
|
|
|
Stationery - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$757.33 |
|
|
|
Steel Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$250,655.65 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$21,405.56 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment Maintenance - Parks |
|
|
|
|
MNG Survey |
$26,647.50 |
|
|
|
Survey- Quinns Beach And Coastal Structures - October 2019 - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd |
$54.95 |
|
|
|
Toys - All About You And Me Program - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd |
$11,613.62 |
|
|
|
Professional Coastal Engineering Services - Clarecastle Access Way - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Nespresso Professional |
$232.00 |
|
|
|
Various Coffee Pods - Office Of CEO |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$728.50 |
|
|
|
Edger Blades - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$408.39 |
|
|
|
Scanner Charges - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Orbit Health & Fitness Solutions |
$333.19 |
|
|
|
Life Fitness Repairs - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$17,838.90 |
|
|
|
Street Tree Data Collection - Pearsall/Hocking - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Arboriculture Report - 13 Ficus On Russell Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Excavation Of Roots - James Spiers Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$155.10 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$1,980.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Inspection - November 2019 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$17,312.80 |
|
|
|
Alarm/CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$772.20 |
|
|
|
Printing - Noongar Spinning Seasons Wheels - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$24,484.96 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$518.00 |
|
|
|
Call Out - Battery - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$2,671.90 |
|
|
|
Replace Gates - Valdina Sump - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Repair Fencing - Mather Reserve - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Repair Fence - Spence Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Riskwest |
$10,307.00 |
|
|
|
Risk Assessment & Project Management Plan - Three Bin Project - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Ron Nyisztor |
$1,718.00 |
|
|
|
Curatorial Layout - Home Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Safeman WA Pty Ltd |
$407.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Safety Tactile Pave |
$5,191.65 |
|
|
|
Replace Tactile Paving - Tollesbury Avenue & Sovereign Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$1,132.77 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$1,417.50 |
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Shaw Document Services Pty Ltd |
$155.65 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$3,322.76 |
|
|
|
Sand Cleaning - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$418.00 |
|
|
|
Signs - Wet Floor - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$2,570.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works/Remove Asbestos - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$550.14 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$289.03 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$698.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Cricket Wicket - Addison Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$283.22 |
|
|
|
CPR Refresher Training - 1 Attendee - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$150.04 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$157.08 |
|
|
|
Dishwasher Detergent - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Surekleen Products |
$111.32 |
|
|
|
Sure Power - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$22.00 |
|
|
|
GST Payable - October 2019 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
TC Precast Pty Ltd |
$776.60 |
|
|
|
Traffic Treatments - Rangeview Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Tenco Engineers Pty Ltd |
$20,900.00 |
|
|
|
Structural Detail - Conservation Fencing - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Structural Engineering Services - Brampton Park Boardwalk - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$5,406.78 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For The Artmaker Trust |
$2,737.49 |
|
|
|
Repairs & Maintenance - Interactive Donation Box - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
The Workwear Group Pty Ltd |
$3,674.45 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Think Promotional |
$759.00 |
|
|
|
200 X Calico Tote Bags - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Tina Peggy Klare |
$300.00 |
|
|
|
Artspoken Art Talk - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$3,345.65 |
|
|
|
Pine Bark Mulch - Hudson Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$474.32 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$2,151.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$133,955.08 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - Carramar Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$66,841.26 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$2,918.80 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$1,273.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Procurement And Contract Management - 1 Attendee - 31.10.2019 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Training - Council Member Essentials Elearning Enrolments - 1 Attendee - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Audit (WA) Pty Ltd |
$15,840.00 |
|
|
|
Audit Services - Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan |
|
|
|
|
Audit Services - Cell 9 Annual Review |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$3,850.00 |
|
|
|
Probity Adviser Services - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Woodlands Distributors & Agencies Pty Ltd |
$5,506.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Drink Fountain - Ferrara Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$70.20 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$2,399.89 |
|
|
|
Weed Control/Watering - Caporn/Spring/Alvarez Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
WSP Australia Pty Ltd |
$17,083.00 |
|
|
|
Traffic Study - Quinns Education - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003702 |
03/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone and Italia Stone Group Joint Venture |
$673,306.05 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 13 - Quinns Beach Long Term Coastal Management Works - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003703 |
04/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$52.90 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$144.50 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$691.30 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$12,408.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
BGC Residential Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Blueprint Homes (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Building Commission |
$56,788.72 |
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payments 01.10.2019 - 31.10.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,294.72 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,534.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$752.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$7,865,290.81 |
|
|
|
2019 / 2020 ESL Quarter 2 Contributions - Ratings Services |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$1,089.20 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Ownership Search - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Eric Jan Byleveld |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$623.45 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 19.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Home Group WA Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$3,390.43 |
|
|
|
Road Name Change - Information Management |
|
|
|
|
Gross Rental Values - Rates |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$532.70 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$581.13 |
|
|
|
Refund Of Invoice 192383 - Credit Due To Adjusted Rate |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,916.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 19.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$7,940.96 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$563.40 |
|
|
|
Mrs Neranjala Thilakarathne |
$720.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - CPA Membership 01.01.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,896.74 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$10,293.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd (Atf The Summit Homes Group Trust) |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$396.08 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$43,437.00 |
|
|
|
Relocation Of Assets - Marmion Avenue - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Relocations Of Assets - Seaside Avenue - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Zurich Australia Insurance Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Excess - WN 33852 - Ref 601184 / 6010792 - Waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003704 |
06/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway Equipment Services Pty Ltd |
$708.40 |
|
|
|
Monthly Charge Parts Washer - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd |
$98,691.33 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 1 - Dennis Cooley Pavilion Upgrade - Infrastructure Capital Works |
|
|
|
|
Myzone (APAC) Pty Ltd |
$1,901.35 |
|
|
|
Gym Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Perth Energy Pty Ltd |
$79,381.30 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003705 |
10/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$555,928.57 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003706 |
10/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$178.10 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Alinta Sales Pty Ltd |
$6,497.28 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$568,224.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions PP12 Period Ending 29.11.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction Industry Training Board |
$37,882.92 |
|
|
|
Collection Approved Levy Payment 01 - 30.11.2019 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Christopher Baker |
$489.22 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$394.38 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$2,001.57 |
|
|
|
Monthly Mailroom Service Fee - IT |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$744.82 |
|
|
|
Recoup Of Expenses - Nigel Bray & John Guthrie - City Of Wanneroo Caravan/Trailer Ashby Operations Centre Vehicle Checks 07.12.2019 - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$85,461.56 |
|
|
|
Koori Kids |
$450.00 |
|
|
|
Donation - Printing & Distribution Of 2020 Naidoc Week School Initiatives To Schools Within City Of Wanneroo |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$57.60 |
|
|
|
Identification Of Land Parcels - Rates |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads WA |
$65,390.60 |
|
|
|
Training - Road Safety Engineering - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Grant Refund - Franklin Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Miss Sarah Patterson |
$139.40 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Medical Centre Attendance |
|
|
|
|
Mr Bimsara Hewa Pathirathna |
$720.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - 2020 CPA Membership Renewal |
|
|
|
|
Mr Daron Elliot |
$533.61 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Damaged Right Side Mirror - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Mr Kenneth Dalton |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Mr Rajesh Malde |
$735.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - CPA Membership Renewal - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Elizabeth Macer |
$198.61 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Party Door Prizes - Gold Program |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd (Atf The Summit Homes Group Trust) |
$524.11 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Incorrect Charge |
|
|
|
|
Tango Badminton |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 Member - Under 13 Australian Badminton Championships - Altona Victoria - 17 - 19.01.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Vodafone Hutchinson Australia Pty Ltd |
$715.77 |
|
|
|
SMS Charges - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$244,716.00 |
|
|
|
Relocation Of Assets - Marmion Avenue - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Lighting Design Fee - Hartman Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003707 |
10/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$2,275.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Assessment Payments From Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,371.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,386.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dot Newton |
$2,496.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$2,501.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda Aitken |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Paul Miles |
$951.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Sonet Coetzee |
$2,596.56 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$11,251.55 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003708 |
10/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
ABC Blinds & Awnings |
$375.00 |
|
|
|
Vertical Blinds - Clarkson Volunteer Bushfire Brigade - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$783.92 |
|
|
|
Reglazed Windows - Alexander Care Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Activ Foundation Incorporated |
$6,270.00 |
|
|
|
Mulching - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Active Discovery |
$200,449.06 |
|
|
|
Spray On Paving - Wishart Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Nankeen Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Playground Equipment - Wilkie Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Apparel |
$221.38 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$17,762.26 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$136.66 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Stores |
|
|
|
|
All Australian Safety Pty Ltd |
$384.65 |
|
|
|
Safety Glass - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Aquatic Services WA Pty Ltd |
$551.43 |
|
|
|
Install Flow Switch To Recirculation Pump - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$211.41 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Armed for Life |
$2,640.00 |
|
|
|
Workshops - 24.10.2019 - 28.11.2019 - Youth |
|
|
|
|
Aussie Natural Spring Water |
$1,585.60 |
|
|
|
Pallets Of Water - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$303.05 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management |
$1,012.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Presentation - 1 Attendee - 19 - 20.09.2019 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty Ltd |
$950.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Skid Steer - 1 Attendee - 02.12.2019 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$533.10 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Barra Civil & Fencing |
$22,102.30 |
|
|
|
Repair Fencing - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Fence - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Damaged Fencing And Gates - Waring Green Park - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bartco Traffic Equipment Pty Ltd |
$883.30 |
|
|
|
Equipment Repairs/Service - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Beaurepaires For Tyres |
$547.14 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Better Impact Pty Ltd |
$1,091.50 |
|
|
|
Travel Costs Associated With Providing 2 X Half Day Training Sessions - IT |
|
|
|
|
Better Pets and Gardens Wangara |
$22.45 |
|
|
|
Animal Care Centre Supplies - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$381.73 |
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Edgar Griffiths Dog Park - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$3,298.90 |
|
|
|
100 3D Pewter Buckles - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Redesign Fee - Southern Suburbs Library - Facilities Projects |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$3,152.95 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix -Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Borrell Rafferty Associates Pty Ltd |
$4,565.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Wanneroo District Netball Association Building Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$2,588.18 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$2,489.83 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$21.88 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$104.50 |
|
|
|
Storage Boxes - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec |
$473.00 |
|
|
|
Burgmatic Chair - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Call Associates Pty Ltd |
$6,319.23 |
|
|
|
Call Centre Services - October 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Canning & Associates Cost Consulting Pty Ltd |
$4,133.80 |
|
|
|
Concept Design - Addison Park Sports Amenities Building Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$2,162.12 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubbish - Parks/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Cineads Australia |
$1,833.33 |
|
|
|
Cinema Advertising - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Support & Maintenance - Solus - IT |
|
|
|
|
CK Maloney Surveying |
$2,079.00 |
|
|
|
Feature & Contour Survey - The Broadview - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Clark Rubber Joondalup |
$49.50 |
|
|
|
Pool Noodles - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$3,142.29 |
|
|
|
Lunch Room & Portable Toilets - Yanchep Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Toilet, Saw - Demolition, Water Supply Unit & Diamond Blade - Rangeview - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilets - Dennis Cooley Pavilion Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$511.76 |
|
|
|
Beverages - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$131.20 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Police Checks X 8 - Community Development/Conservation/Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Community Greenwaste Recycling Pty Ltd |
$4,307.82 |
|
|
|
Material Disposal - Engineering/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$220.40 |
|
|
|
Lay Turf - Koondoola Avenue - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Computer Badge Embroidery |
$19.37 |
|
|
|
Velcro Name Badge - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Scorecard |
$800.80 |
|
|
|
Financial & Performance Assessments - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$756.80 |
|
|
|
Signs - Kingsway Wanneroo City Soccer Club - Facilities Projects |
|
|
|
|
Coyle Editing Service |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
|
Editorial Services - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$64,364.56 |
|
|
|
Court Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Data Documents |
$2,743.40 |
|
|
|
Construction Site Banner - Dennis Cooley Pavilion - Projects |
|
|
|
|
DC Golf |
$73,836.50 |
|
|
|
Commission Fees - Carramar Golf Course - Property |
|
|
|
|
Commission Fees - Marangaroo Golf Course - Property |
|
|
|
|
Department of Water and Environmental Regulation |
$6,496.00 |
|
|
|
Annual License Fee - Wangara Recycling Centre - Waste |
|
|
|
|
DFP Recruitment Services |
$1,998.15 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas |
$977.14 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Digital Education Services |
$1,006.85 |
|
|
|
DVD Stock - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$41,566.74 |
|
|
|
Roadworks - Various Locations - Construction/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$6,187.50 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$286.60 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
DVM Fencing |
$242.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Fencing - Camden Glade - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$887.16 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd |
$33,658.90 |
|
|
|
Landscape Design Fee - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Flora & Fauna Surveys - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$31,749.68 |
|
|
|
Install Irrigation - Edgar Griffiths Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$130,259.29 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
EPC Technologies Pty Ltd |
$5,390.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Energy Feasibility - Neerabup Industrial Area - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Workforce Solutions Pty Limited |
$231.00 |
|
|
|
Australian Criminal History Check - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Fire & Safety WA |
$1,206.15 |
|
|
|
PPE - Boots - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Flick Anticimex Pty Ltd |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Install Baby Change Table - Wanneroo Showgrounds Toilets - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd |
$131.99 |
|
|
|
Screen Wash - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$2,337.69 |
|
|
|
Lighter And Torch - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$25,735.08 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works - Various Locations - Projects/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Global Marine Enclosures Pty Ltd |
$7,711.00 |
|
|
|
Summer Maintenance - November 2019 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Grant Thornton Perth |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Audit Fee - Grant Acquittal Roads To Recovery - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$605.00 |
|
|
|
Yanchep Open Space - Grass Tree - Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
GSR Laser Tools |
$169.40 |
|
|
|
Seco - Carry Bags - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$239.80 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Koondoola Avenue - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hare & Forbes Pty Ltd |
$810.60 |
|
|
|
Industrial Shelving - Ashby Depot - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore Joondalup |
$499.00 |
|
|
|
Dyson Vacuum - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,321.49 |
|
|
|
Nurses For Immunisation - Health |
|
|
|
|
Hemsley Paterson |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Market Rental Valuation - Hairdressing Tenancy - Property |
|
|
|
|
Hendry Group Pty Ltd |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
|
BCA Compliance & Condition Audit - Quinns Rocks Sports Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$132,108.90 |
|
|
|
Replace Screws - Jindalee - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Repair Limestone Wall - Nankeen Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Roof Sheets - Kingsway Football Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$10,322.40 |
|
|
|
Remove/Reinstall Pump - Hardcastle Park |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$105,170.80 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$451.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Flyers - Wanneroo Festival - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Banner With Eyelets - Wanneroo Festival - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Impact Training Corporation |
$3,476.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Back To Basics - Aquamotion/Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
InfluenceIT Consulting Pty Ltd |
$237.60 |
|
|
|
Spira Training - IT |
|
|
|
|
Ink Station |
$69.27 |
|
|
|
12 X Cartridge - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$13,228.08 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Staffing |
$1,048.41 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$636.79 |
|
|
|
Fire Helmet - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA WA |
$950.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Public Works Professional Development Week - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$199.14 |
|
|
|
Pool Chlorine - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$1,426.70 |
|
|
|
Boots And Safety Glasses - Stores |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$3,276.11 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$24,468.40 |
|
|
|
Kerbing Works - Various Locations - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Kinetic IT Pty Ltd |
$10,541.27 |
|
|
|
Monthly Service Fee - Kinetic Threat Intelligence November 2019 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$1,471.60 |
|
|
|
Remove Graffiti Ghosting - Clarkson VBFB - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$6,100.82 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landmark Products Limited |
$1,535.60 |
|
|
|
Staircase Repairs - Two Rocks - Asset Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$235,152.53 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$1,037.70 |
|
|
|
Monthly Contract Fees - Group Fitness - December - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Lets Go Kids |
$1,859.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Advocacy Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking WA Pty Ltd |
$21,993.24 |
|
|
|
Repaint The Main Workshop - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking - Girrawheen Hub - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals Australia WA |
$340.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Age Friendly Australia National Forum - 1 Attendee - Community Planning & Development |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$3,421.84 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Market Creations |
$37,715.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Intranet Platform - IT |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$19,692.13 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$19,369.35 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd |
$105.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Occupancy Permit - Not Required |
|
|
|
|
McLeods |
$11,880.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$270,064.65 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,588.22 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$11,995.50 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids Pty Ltd |
$264.55 |
|
|
|
Craft Equipment - Wanneroo Festival - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$1,593.00 |
|
|
|
Pole Saw - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Wool Bale Bags - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Nu-Trac Rural Contracting |
$15,945.48 |
|
|
|
Beach Cleaning - Quinns Beach- Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Office Line |
$2,442.00 |
|
|
|
12 Office Chairs - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$12,396.15 |
|
|
|
Arboriculture Reports - Various Locations - Projects/Waste/Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$107.80 |
|
|
|
Supply One Padlock - Grandis Sports Pavilion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Perth Materials Blowing Pty Ltd |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Blower Truck Hire - Celebration Boulevard - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Auditing - Nankeen/Wilkie - Projects |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$1,676.48 |
|
|
|
Power Shield - IT |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$3,386.36 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$3,863.67 |
|
|
|
Printing - Art Awards - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Flip Fire & Burning Brochure - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Your Dog And The Law - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$18,853.78 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ray Makene Driving School |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
HC Driver Training - 3 Attendees - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Refresh Waters Pty Ltd |
$22.00 |
|
|
|
Bottled Water Refills - Girrawheen Library |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$13,061.27 |
|
|
|
Install Fencing - Sovereign/ Damepattie - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Install Bollards - Ocean Reef Road/Backshall Place - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Replace Bollards - Berteaux - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Install/Repair Windbreak Fencing - Yanchep Surf Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Remove/Reinstall Bollards - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Bollards - Scenic Drive - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$7,408.25 |
|
|
|
Image Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$608,067.41 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 8 - Pinjar Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$405,760.92 |
|
|
|
Road Works Various Locations For The City |
|
|
|
|
Rubbish Removal by Steve |
$4,508.00 |
|
|
|
Remove Rubbish - Nanovich Avenue - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Safeman WA Pty Ltd |
$412.50 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Safety Tactile Pave |
$15,708.24 |
|
|
|
Install Terracotta Tiles - Blackmore Avenue - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Replace Tactile Pavers - Mirrabooka Ave - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Replace Tactile Pavers - Bridgetown Nursing Home - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Replace Tactile Pavers - Ocean Reef Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Safety World |
$62.70 |
|
|
|
Hats - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$99,053.90 |
|
|
|
Printing - What's Happening Newsletters - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Printing & Wrapping - 2020 Calendar - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$22.50 |
|
|
|
Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sharna Sumpton |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Emergency Management Awareness Training - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Sheridans For Badges |
$109.46 |
|
|
|
Name Badge - Cr Cvitan - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$1,476.20 |
|
|
|
White Sand Top Up - Landsdale Primary School - Parks |
|
|
|
|
White Sand - Monticello Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$647.90 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals & Testing Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Sine Group Pty Ltd |
$1,501.50 |
|
|
|
Device Management - IT |
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$3,146.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Dennis Cooley Pavilion Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$5,437.52 |
|
|
|
Remove Asbestos - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Service - Dennis Cooley Reserve - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$3,418.43 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$606.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Solution 4 Building Pty Ltd |
$102,769.95 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 2 - Shelvock Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$1,055.15 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions |
$877.48 |
|
|
|
DVD & CD Cases - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Sports Marketing Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,490.00 |
|
|
|
Placement Fee - Infused Crossfit 3V3 Showdown, Touch Football Junior State Championships & Australian Skateboarding State Qualifier - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Sports World of WA |
$828.85 |
|
|
|
Goggles - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$401.60 |
|
|
|
Event Health Services - Community Preparedness Roadshow - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Training - First Aid - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$1,490.52 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$3,296.07 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd |
$153,278.77 |
|
|
|
Bulk Waste - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Sunlim Pty Ltd |
$1,672.00 |
|
|
|
Network Administration Support - IT |
|
|
|
|
Systems Edge Management Services Pty Ltd |
$11,741.13 |
|
|
|
Stage 2 Billing - 25% Progress Invoice - Tourist Park Lot 211 Quinns Road - Property |
|
|
|
|
TA Johnson |
$1,800.00 |
|
|
|
Market Material - Wanneroo Festival - Events |
|
|
|
|
Taman Tools |
$60.50 |
|
|
|
Service Core Drill - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
TC Precast Pty Ltd |
$1,529.00 |
|
|
|
Wave Grates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Teknacool Marketing |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Reflective Kerb Markings - Hocking - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$3,187.91 |
|
|
|
Vacuum Excavate Potholes - Rangeview Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Excavate Tree Roots For Investigation - James Spier Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Splendid Park & Koondoola Tennis Courts - Projects |
|
|
|
|
The Event Mill Pty Ltd |
$30.55 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business Notification Fee - Not Required |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$159.30 |
|
|
|
Certificates - Infant Aquatics - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Resuscitation Award Fee - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For Sabre Nominees Trust |
$3,233.00 |
|
|
|
Mirror - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For The H2 Unit Trust |
$7,425.00 |
|
|
|
Marketing - Location Filming - Good Chef Bad Chef - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for The Joondalup Drive Unit Trust |
$188.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Workwear Group Pty Ltd |
$4,004.83 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Thinkfield |
$5,335.00 |
|
|
|
Survey - Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Development - Property |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$17,397.38 |
|
|
|
Pine Bark Mulch - Yanchep Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Pine Bark Mulch - Santa Rosalia Vista - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$286.19 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toolmart |
$189.95 |
|
|
|
Tool Purchases - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Total Tools Joondalup |
$104.90 |
|
|
|
Tool Purchases - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Totally Workwear Joondalup |
$323.80 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - 2 Members - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$20,897.80 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Hardcastle Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$112.30 |
|
|
|
Name Badges For Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Glass Arrow - 2019 Quinns Rocks Emergency Services Cadet Core Participation Award - Communication & Events |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$2,909.50 |
|
|
|
Remove Cricket Mats - Leatherback - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Broadleave Spray - Kingsway Cricket/Hartman Drive - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Viking Rentals |
$386.23 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilet Service - Splendid Park - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd |
$30,372.21 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
|
Service Roller Doors - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company |
$1,180.57 |
|
|
|
Limestone - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Waler Australia Pty Ltd |
$307.78 |
|
|
|
Magic Sponges - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$431.61 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Stationery, Locks & Keys And Key Cabinet - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$7,004.64 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Uniforms |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Lab Coat Unisex - Health |
|
|
|
|
Waterproofing Works Epoxy Grout Specialist |
$5,185.00 |
|
|
|
Tiling Works - Quinns Mindarie SLSC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$597.08 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works - Kingsway Aquatic Play Space - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Westbuild Products Pty Ltd |
$612.48 |
|
|
|
Rainproof Kwikset - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$13,292.33 |
|
|
|
Mulching Of Green Waste - WRC - Waste |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$323.24 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,146.04 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
Whitfords Event Hire |
$663.00 |
|
|
|
Marquee & Equipment - Wanneroo Show - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Probity Adviser Services - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$3,545.79 |
|
|
|
Security Services For They City |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$166.50 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$19,754.41 |
|
|
|
Install Coir Mesh Matting - Yanchep Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Wrong Fuel Rescue Pty Ltd |
$565.67 |
|
|
|
Incorrect Fuel - WN 34315 - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture |
$6,941.31 |
|
|
|
Yanchep Hub - Rent, Outgoings, Rates And Taxes For December 2019 - Property |
|
|
|
|
Zeplin Pty Ltd |
$23,320.00 |
|
|
|
Pronester Planner & Display Licence - January - December 2020 - Business Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003709 |
13/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Geared Construction Pty Ltd |
$200,848.63 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 9 - Wanneroo District Netball Association Building Upgrade - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003710 |
16/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$19,220.23 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003711 |
17/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$25,450.47 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003712 |
17/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd |
$118,869.86 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 2 - Cooley Pavilion Upgrade At Hudson Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Solution 4 Building Pty Ltd |
$124,065.56 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 4 - Wanneroo City Soccer Change Room & Store Rooms - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003713 |
17/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$861.30 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$108.80 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$691.30 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$26,217.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
BGC Residential Pty Ltd |
$4,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,294.72 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,434.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$760.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Jacqueline Huntley |
$1,175.25 |
|
|
|
Clothing Allowance & Travel Allowance 21.10.2019 - 06.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Paul Miles |
$3,242.36 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance July - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage |
$5,708.60 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application - Paid Twice Solutions Dap Reference: DAP/19/01703 Value: $2,600,000 Address: Lots 1 & 132 (1351 & 1369) Wanneroo Road Wanneroo Proposal: Service Station |
|
|
|
|
Essential First Choice Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Football West Limited |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 1 Member - Futsal National Championships - Canberra Act - 13 - 17.01.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Halpd Pty Ltd Trading As Affordable Living Homes |
$6,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 3 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$623.45 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$2,337.73 |
|
|
|
Enquiries/UV & GRV Interim Values - Rates, Property & Approvals |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,074.60 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,855.26 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$9,233.59 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits - Salary Packaging - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$2,063.03 |
|
|
|
Mr Graham John Woodard |
$243.55 |
|
|
|
Keyholder |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ian Mullane |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Mr Roy Bastick |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Payment |
|
|
|
|
Ms Peggy Brown |
$145.00 |
|
|
|
Keyholder |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,904.73 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits - November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Plunkett Homes (1903) Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Simsai Construction Group Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$9,474.43 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deduction - Period Ending 13.12.2019 |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$61.29 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$48,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 24 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
WA Electoral Commission |
$463,525.10 |
|
|
|
2019 Ordinary Council Elections - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$21,570.00 |
|
|
|
Streetlight Installation - Bannerman Court Marangaroo - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Street Lighting - Rangeview Road Landsdale - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003714 |
18/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$11,555.50 |
|
|
|
Traffic Treatments - Kingsway Drive - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$3,886.80 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Active Discovery |
$148,662.46 |
|
|
|
Replace Panel - Wilkie Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Various Parks In The City - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Adform Engraving & Signs |
$145.75 |
|
|
|
Photo Board Tags & Helmet Tags/Labels - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$28,876.67 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
African OZ Drum N Dance |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Deposit - Performance - Wanneroo Festival 2020 - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$285.12 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Airlite Cleaning |
$232.28 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services - Yanchep Community Hub - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
7 Medium Arrangements - Christmas Dinner 10.12.2019 - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
AMBIUS |
$174.10 |
|
|
|
Plant Rental - Girrawheen Hub - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Animal Pest Management Services |
$3,190.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Appliance Service Agents Pty Ltd |
$142.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Oven - WLCC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Archival Survival Pty Ltd |
$766.43 |
|
|
|
Archiving Supplies - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Arci Welding Industries |
$701.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Aslab Pty Ltd |
$9,025.50 |
|
|
|
Testing - Asphalt Cores - Prindiville Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Testing - Asphalt Cores - Irwin Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Testing - Asphalt Cores - Brady Street - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Testing - Asphalt Cores - Beach Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$150.30 |
|
|
|
4 Face Shields - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$187,619.46 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$9,599.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - 5 Land Mobile Doss Site - High Road Wanneroo - IT |
|
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - Doss Site - IT |
|
|
|
|
Australian Property Consultants |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Rental Valuation - Bracknell Street - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$4,956.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$436.72 |
|
|
|
Paper - Print Room Supplies |
|
|
|
|
Barra Civil & Fencing |
$18,908.51 |
|
|
|
Replace Fencing - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Projects |
|
|
|
|
BBC Entertainment |
$2,035.00 |
|
|
|
The Christmas Wishes Performance - Live In The Amphitheatre - Events |
|
|
|
|
Better Pets and Gardens Wangara |
$45.14 |
|
|
|
Animal Care Centre Supplies - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Bidfood Perth |
$853.40 |
|
|
|
Kitchen Supplies - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$1,490.50 |
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Edgar Griffiths Park - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - Ferrara Park - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Bobcat-Attach |
$2,189.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$1,932.92 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Boss Bollards |
$374.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Locks - Kingsway Olympic Soccer Club - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$93,321.85 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For November 2019 |
|
|
|
|
BPA Engineering Pty Ltd |
$2,684.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - Two Rocks Early Learing Centre - Facility Projects |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$19,861.24 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$663.14 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$13,118.38 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores/Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$186.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cameron Chisholm & Nicol (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,220.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$6,140.90 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$38,004.58 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$10,211.72 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chubb Fire & Security Pty Ltd |
$151.90 |
|
|
|
Fire Extinguisher Refill - Ashby Operations Centre - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$27,566.11 |
|
|
|
Licence Support & Maintenance - Authority Etutorials - 01.01.2020 - 31.12.2020 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Licence, Support & Maintenance - Client Server Tools - IT |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,455.35 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway |
$21,143.97 |
|
|
|
Recycling Tip Fees - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway Daniels Services Pty Ltd |
$226.51 |
|
|
|
Delivery And Pick Up Of S22 Sharpsmart Containers - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$1,835.28 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$425.80 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilet - Yanchep Beach Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilet - Rangeview Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Colourpoint Print & Design |
$743.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Bush Fire Infringement Books - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Committee For Economic Development of Australia |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Disrupting Disadvantage : Setting The Scene - 1 Attendee - Community Planning |
|
|
|
|
Committee for Perth |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Bronze Membership - February 2020 - January 2021 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Connect Security Systems |
$333.58 |
|
|
|
Replace Reed Switch & Cabinet - Kingsway Olympic Soccer Clubrooms - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Converge International Pty Ltd |
$9,762.50 |
|
|
|
Employee Support Services - 01.12.2019 - 28.02.2020 - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Cooldrive Distribution |
$515.25 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Coolican Civil Engineering Pty Ltd |
$643.50 |
|
|
|
Replace Communications Pit Lids - Ridgewood Boulevard - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Scorecard |
$2,024.44 |
|
|
|
Financial & Performance Assessment - Various - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,494.76 |
|
|
|
Sign - Mindarie Beach Works - Asset Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Playground Renewal/ Refurbishment - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Construction Notification - Kingsway Dog Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Dogs Prohibited/ Pedestrian Access Restricted - Wanneroo Showgrounds - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sign Installation - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Beware Ducklings - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Public Comments - Leasing & Land |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$38,037.85 |
|
|
|
Training - Emergency Warden - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Fire Protection Works - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Annual Maintenance Inspections For The City - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CSP Group |
$513.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd |
$4,062.03 |
|
|
|
Engine Valuation - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Insite Subscription - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
CW Brands Pty Ltd |
$3,538.38 |
|
|
|
Spray Paint & Lubricant - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Kerosene - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Cyclus Pty Ltd |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
50% Site Crew Deposit - Wanneroo Festival - Events |
|
|
|
|
Data Documents |
$970.20 |
|
|
|
Dog Signs - Edgar Griffiths - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Datavoice Communications Pty Ltd |
$1,529.00 |
|
|
|
Conference Phone - IT |
|
|
|
|
Dave Lanfear Consulting |
$13,816.00 |
|
|
|
Feasibility Study - Second Operations Centre Within The City - Asset Planning |
|
|
|
|
Deans Auto Glass |
$401.50 |
|
|
|
Supply/Fit Windscreen - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Department of the Premier and Cabinet |
$166.10 |
|
|
|
Government Gazette Advertising - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Plumbing & Gas |
$88,133.28 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Digga West |
$695.20 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$826.32 |
|
|
|
Microphone Stand - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Install Two Way Radio - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$163,760.25 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Various Locations - Projects/Construction/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$123,118.41 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping, Drainage Clearing - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Gross Pollutant Trap Cleaning - November 2019 - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Echelon Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,730.00 |
|
|
|
Audit - Working At Heights - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Training - 3 Contract Risk Sessions - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,722.50 |
|
|
|
Vegetation Assessment - Wanneroo/Neerabup - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$2,253.41 |
|
|
|
Case Management & Ergonomic Assessment - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Edith Cowan University |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Student Prizes - Business & Law Entrepreneurship And Innovation - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$19,363.63 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iron Filter Services - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replacement Controller - Wanneroo Skate Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Install Reticulation - Entry Statement - Celestine Street - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Environmental Services Pty Ltd |
$11,384.26 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Stormwater Masterplan - Infrastructure Capital Works |
|
|
|
|
Surface And Groundwater Monitoring - Yellagonga Regional Park & Wangara Industrial Area - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Emergination |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop - Team Vision & Focus - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Entire IT |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Technical Support - Remote Assistance 03.12.2019 - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$38,877.32 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Workforce Solutions Pty Limited |
$2,619.55 |
|
|
|
Monthly Erecruit Fee - IT |
|
|
|
|
Evoke Interior Design Pty Ltd |
$6,182.00 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks Playgroup - Accessibility Improvements & Maintenance - Facility Projects |
|
|
|
|
Phil Renkin Community Centre - Site Inspection - Facility Projects |
|
|
|
|
Finbrella |
$15,566.89 |
|
|
|
6 Wind Stable Umbrellas - Civic Centre Extension - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Flick Anticimex Pty Ltd |
$4,373.95 |
|
|
|
Baby Changetable - Kingsway Olympic Clubrooms - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Sanitary Disposal Services For The City - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Ferrara Paloma Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,559.75 |
|
|
|
Glass Cleaner, Brake Clean & Handcleaner - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Forrest And Forrest Games |
$8,316.00 |
|
|
|
Irrigation Water Analysis X 52 Locations - September 2019 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$6,005.14 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Annual Pressure Testing Of Layflat Hoses & Consumables - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Gen Connect Pty Ltd |
$413.99 |
|
|
|
Replace Battery & Fuel Line - Emergency Power Generator - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$122,100.40 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$14,132.56 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 7 & 8 - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota |
$455.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
GrantReady |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Grant Guru Portal Access - 2019 / 2020 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Green Options Pty Ltd |
$1,232.00 |
|
|
|
Hand Fertiliser - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Griffiths Architects |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Groeneveld Lubrication Solutions Pty Ltd |
$432.31 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$1,111.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$2,041.66 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issue |
|
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics |
$1,684.16 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$9,869.20 |
|
|
|
Repair Limestone Wall - Nankeen Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Re-Staining - Jindalee Beach Northern Stairs - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hinds Sand Supplies |
$474.10 |
|
|
|
Gingin Loam - Gumblossom Oval - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Horizon West Landscape & Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$133,324.40 |
|
|
|
Landscaping Works - St Andrews Reserve - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Final Claim - Irrigation Replacement - St Andrews Park - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$1,995.51 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$6,933.30 |
|
|
|
Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$59,046.76 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$214.50 |
|
|
|
Forex Prints - 20 Years A City - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Inclusion Solutions Limited |
$466.79 |
|
|
|
Lunch & Learn Presentation - Disability Awareness - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
InfluenceIT Consulting Pty Ltd |
$59.40 |
|
|
|
Training - Spira User - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Insight Electrical Technology |
$16,545.96 |
|
|
|
Vandalism Repairs - Wanneroo Skate Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Floodlighting - John Moloney Park - Facility Projects |
|
|
|
|
Instant Transportable Offices Pty Ltd |
$1,595.00 |
|
|
|
Certificate Of Construction Compliance - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$23,218.52 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intelife Group |
$18,012.48 |
|
|
|
BBQ Cleaning For The City |
|
|
|
|
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$241.26 |
|
|
|
Lay Flat Fire Hose - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
IPWEA |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Webinar - Iso Technical Specification 29.10.2019 - 1 Attendee - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$5,071.05 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$2,087.76 |
|
|
|
Disinfection Of Pools Chlorine Gas Supply |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$3,613.58 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Jesse Lewis Winton |
$2,739.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Joondalup Autospark |
$709.00 |
|
|
|
Camera & SD Card - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Kelyn Training Services |
$2,410.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Work Safely And Follow WHS Policy And Procedure 05.11.2019 - 4 Attendees - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$3,529.25 |
|
|
|
Pressure Clean Paint - Pinjar Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal - Whitfield Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Komatsu Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,520.00 |
|
|
|
Oil Sample Kit X 100 - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Ladybird's Plant Hire |
$207.90 |
|
|
|
Indoor Plant Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$32,889.68 |
|
|
|
Weed Control Services - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Lantern Creative Pty Ltd |
$5,423.00 |
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy - Wanneroo City Soccer Club - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$1,517.26 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Corporate Support/Fleet/Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Law Gear |
$514.78 |
|
|
|
Puncture & Cut Resistant Gloves - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$150,905.01 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Leamac Picture Framing |
$2,100.00 |
|
|
|
Framing - Kati Thamo Art Collection - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
LG Professionals Australia |
$5,885.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - 2020 Australasian Management Challenge - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking WA Pty Ltd |
$1,939.44 |
|
|
|
Linemarking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Lyons Airconditioning Services (WA) Pty Ltd |
$418.36 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Maar Koodjal Aboriginal Corporation |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Consultation - Turner Collection - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Mackay Urban Design |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$3,406.68 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Malay Association Of Western Australia |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Live Performance - Wanneroo Festival - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Manheim Pty Ltd |
$4,153.05 |
|
|
|
Selling & Towing Fees For Vehicles - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Marindust Sales & Ace Flagpoles |
$321.75 |
|
|
|
Soccer Goal Tube Caps - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$4,300.56 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$8,559.38 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McLeods |
$4,779.64 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$11,000.00 |
|
|
|
Support For Recruitment Of Manager Communications & Events - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$44.43 |
|
|
|
Steel Supplies - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$650,683.46 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$148,695.25 |
|
|
|
Crane Hire To Remove Footings - Shamrock Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Playground Equipment - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Playground Renewal - Various Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Modern Motor Trimmers |
$551.64 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Seat Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
MP Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd |
$12,207.52 |
|
|
|
Design Fees - Clarecastle Retreat Beach Access - Projects |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$1,944.99 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$45,378.45 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Nerida Moredoundt |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Neverfail Springwater Limited |
$39.00 |
|
|
|
Bottled Water - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Neylor Blinds Pty Ltd |
$3,141.77 |
|
|
|
Install Blinds - New Civic Centre - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Nintex Pty Ltd |
$2,359.50 |
|
|
|
Monthly Subscription - Promapp - IT |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$135.00 |
|
|
|
Air Filter - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Oce Australia Limited |
$505.17 |
|
|
|
Scanner Charges - Assets/IT |
|
|
|
|
Office Of The Auditor General |
$104,500.00 |
|
|
|
Statutory Audit 2018 / 2019 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$247.92 |
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
On Road Auto Electrics |
$1,686.22 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Panther Protective Coatings |
$2,734.60 |
|
|
|
Pool Tiles - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$8,767.00 |
|
|
|
Arboriculture Reports - Various Locations |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$2,099.90 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Pedersens Event Hire |
$1,710.50 |
|
|
|
Marquees For Christmas - Live In The Amphitheatre - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
People Solutions Australasia Pty Ltd |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
5 ISAT Reports - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Peoplestreme Pty Ltd |
$105,596.70 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Peoplestreme Learning And Development - IT |
|
|
|
|
Subscription - Go1 Premium - 11.01.2020 - 30.06.2020 - IT |
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Community Transport Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
Perth Energy Pty Ltd |
$116,312.52 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Perth Progressive Supplies |
$1,963.10 |
|
|
|
Viroclean - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Phase 3 Landscape Construction Pty Ltd |
$33,540.76 |
|
|
|
Install Playground Equipment - Carona Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$2,310.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Monthly Inspection - 12 Sites - December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Playground Auditing - Las Ramblas Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$634.00 |
|
|
|
Dual Monitor And Desktop - IT |
|
|
|
|
Business Monitor - IT |
|
|
|
|
PR Mattaboni & Co |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Survey Fenceline - Anchorage Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Precision Laser Systems |
$274.95 |
|
|
|
Pipe Laser Service & Repair - Surveys |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$9,101.58 |
|
|
|
CCTV/Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$1,150.21 |
|
|
|
Printing - Letter Heads/Business Cards - Elected Members - Council Support |
|
|
|
|
Professional Trapping Supplies |
$1,147.00 |
|
|
|
4ft Ketch & Release Dog Pole - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$10,293.51 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Promolab |
$951.06 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Callout - Flat Batteries - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Raeco |
$2,550.50 |
|
|
|
Flip Tables - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Rebel Sport |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Rebel Gift Vouchers - Kingsway Sports Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Recipe Records Pty Ltd |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
50% Deposit For Riley Pearce - Live Performance At Global Beats & Eats - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$56,696.20 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,387.85 |
|
|
|
Lease Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$1,738,493.26 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Connolly Drive - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Progress Claim 9 - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Projects |
|
|
|
|
RM Gillis & CJ Marci |
$3,650.00 |
|
|
|
Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$61,976.93 |
|
|
|
Profiling - Wanneroo Service Road - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Progress Claims - Two Rocks Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$1,962.78 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd |
$600.58 |
|
|
|
Hire Of Cabin - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
RPS Australia West Pty Ltd |
$3,465.00 |
|
|
|
Oval Drainage Design - Jimbub Swamp Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
RSEA Pty Ltd |
$883.34 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issue |
|
|
|
|
Safeman WA Pty Ltd |
$132.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue |
$3,173.50 |
|
|
|
Height Safety Equipment Inspection - Kingsway - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Works On Anchor Bolts - Hainsworth Leisure Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$1,823.40 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Tick Twisters - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Aust Pty Ltd |
$3,410.00 |
|
|
|
Lift Service - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Shred-X |
$302.06 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$635.25 |
|
|
|
Sand Clean - Moorehead Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sand - Slate Park Playground - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Silver Squid Productions |
$2,997.50 |
|
|
|
Director Of Photography - Production For Wanneroo News Stories - Community Planning |
|
|
|
|
Site Architecture Studio |
$5,753.00 |
|
|
|
Concept Design - Changeroom Upgrade - Montrose Park - Facilities Planning |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$2,466.42 |
|
|
|
Asbestos Removal And Report - Benmuni Reserve - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$7,521.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$2,833.15 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet/Stores |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$44,755.70 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$688.55 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$605.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs Softfall - Fishermans Hollow - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$4,174.30 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
SoundPack Solutions |
$258.50 |
|
|
|
CD Packs - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$5,291.36 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies & Training Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$150.04 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$1,133.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Strainer Bags - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Stepchange Consultants Pty Ltd |
$11,687.50 |
|
|
|
Upgrade Schedule - IT |
|
|
|
|
CI Anywhere 2019B - Upgrade - IT |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$1,501.45 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd |
$6,425.10 |
|
|
|
Refuse Collection - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Sunlim Pty Ltd |
$888.25 |
|
|
|
Upgrade Core Switches IOS, Install 10G Uplinks - IT |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Of Sports Bibs - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Shades |
$21,714.00 |
|
|
|
Install Shade Sails - Damperia Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Switched Onto Safety |
$3,025.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Licence - Chemwatch – January 2020 - December 2020 - Business Systems |
|
|
|
|
Tamala Park Regional Council |
$2,017.00 |
|
|
|
GST Payable For November 2019 Pursuant To Section 153B Of Agreement - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Taman Tools |
$3,008.50 |
|
|
|
Tool Purchases - Stores/Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Taylor Robinson Chaney Broderick |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Panel Review - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$5,927.90 |
|
|
|
GIS Consulting Services - IT |
|
|
|
|
Provide Spatial Consulting - IT |
|
|
|
|
Upgrade Test Environment To 2019A - IT |
|
|
|
|
Tenancy Consulting |
$2,178.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Hydraulic Services - Phil Renkin Library & Community Centre |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$7,749.39 |
|
|
|
Remove Pothole Markers - McDermott Parade - Design |
|
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Various Locations - Projects |
|
|
|
|
That Greek Food Truck |
$246.00 |
|
|
|
Catering - Events Officers - Wanneroo Show |
|
|
|
|
The Basketball Man |
$4,884.00 |
|
|
|
Netball Padding, Repair Post - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Basketball System & Installation Of New Park Tower - Clarkson Community Centre - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Distributors Perth |
$226.30 |
|
|
|
Snacks & Confectionery - Kingsway Indoor Stadium |
|
|
|
|
The Event Mill Pty Ltd |
$6,589.00 |
|
|
|
50% Deposit - Global Village Entrance Feature - Wanneroo Festival 2020 - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
50% Deposit - Australia Day - Communications & Events |
|
|
|
|
The Factory (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$45,347.50 |
|
|
|
Install Christmas Decorations For The City - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Ratchet - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$4,415.32 |
|
|
|
Testing/Maintenance - Kingsway Aquatic Playspace - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Signage - Water Park Closure - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for CWC Trust |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Ridgewood Park Lighting Upgrade - Facility Projects |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for New Dealership Trust |
$1,887.45 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for The Carmel Trust |
$5,476.90 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Tender Documentation And Assessment - Waste |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Wilbro Unit Trust |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Remover - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Workwear Group Pty Ltd |
$890.71 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Thirty4 Pty Ltd |
$211.20 |
|
|
|
Monthly Subscription - QNAV Mobile Data - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$133,276.22 |
|
|
|
Mulching Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$677.73 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$64,231.20 |
|
|
|
Mulching - Edgar Griffiths Parks - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Supply/Install Dog Park Equipment & Landscape Works - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Mulch Top Up - Cheltondale Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Touch Football Australia Limited |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Event Placement Fee - Touch Football Junior State Championships 2019 & 2020 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$1,231.15 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Training Services Australia |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Safety And Health Representative Refresher Course 20.11.2019 - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Tree Planting & Watering |
$48,814.80 |
|
|
|
Residential Tree Watering - Two Rocks/Yanchep - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Tree Watering For The City - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$41,231.30 |
|
|
|
Pump Electrical Works At Various Locations For The City |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$573.12 |
|
|
|
Name Badges For Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Sports Prizes - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$2,568.86 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Repair Footsteps - 97074 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$118,122.39 |
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - Carramar Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Golf Course Maintenance - Marangaroo Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Spray Biagra - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turfmaster Pty Ltd |
$23,210.06 |
|
|
|
Turfing - Edgar Griffiths Reserve - Dog Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Tyrecycle Pty Ltd |
$892.21 |
|
|
|
Tyre Collection - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Valvoline (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$7,405.86 |
|
|
|
Hydraulic Oil - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd |
$25,391.61 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
Vocus Communications |
$247.50 |
|
|
|
NBN Connection - YTRAC - IT |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$3,080.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Motor - Clarkson Volunteer Bushfire Office - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$154,018.92 |
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - Hino Auto Crew WN 34304 $151,226.20 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Agricultural Machinery |
$2,377.45 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$38,878.37 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Shade Pty Ltd |
$81,065.60 |
|
|
|
Inspect/Install Shade Sails - Various Locations - Parks/Projects |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$4,176.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Managing Contracts In Local Government - 1 Attendee - 05.11.2019 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Financial Reports & Budgets - 1 Attendee - 09.12.2019 - Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Training - Serving On Council - 1 Attendee - 05 - 06.12.2019 - Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Financial Reports & Budgets - 1 Attendee - 09.12.2019 - Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Training - Meeting Procedures 10.12.2019 - 1 Attendee - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Training - Managing Contracts - 05.11.2019 - 1 Attendee - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Training - Meeting Procedures - December 2019 - 1 Attendee - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$2,398.00 |
|
|
|
Empty Washdown Bay - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Service Grease Trap - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$143.66 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services - Civic Centre - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$11,502.04 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Audit Committee 19.11.2019 - Risk |
|
|
|
|
Probity Services - Tender 19166 - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Winc Australia Pty Limited |
$8,842.97 |
|
|
|
Stationery For The City |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$166.50 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - 1 Attendee - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$45,770.74 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Environmental Offset Sites - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture |
$382.80 |
|
|
|
YTRAC Internet Service - November & December 2019 - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Zanotech |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Printer Setup - Councillor - IT |
|
|
|
|
Zenien |
$1,354.65 |
|
|
|
IT Consulting - Girrawheen Hub - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003715 |
23/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase September 2019 - Breakdown Below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFTs |
$22,856,184.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK |
|||
|
00003715 |
23/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase September 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment Pty Ltd - Hand-Held Herbicide Sprayers |
$176.00 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$527.44 |
|
|
|
JB Ocean Keys - Phone Charger |
$22.95 |
|
|
|
Mirco - Materials Required For Use In Parks |
$770.00 |
|
|
|
Plantrite - Infill Plants - Limelight Theatre |
$93.80 |
|
|
|
Richgro Garden - Mulch - Volunteers - Cockman House Vegie Gardens |
$356.00 |
|
|
|
Subway Restaurant - Bus Trip Lunch |
$143.00 |
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed - Tie Down Straps |
$53.35 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Event Catering |
$80.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Electrical - Plastic Cable Trunking - Quinns Fire Station |
$82.50 |
|
|
|
Advanced Lock Key - Keys & Locks |
$83.00 |
|
|
|
ARC Ltd - Air Conditioning - Annual Licence Fee |
$225.00 |
|
|
|
Ashdown Ingram - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$126.99 |
|
|
|
Audi Centre Perth - Vehicle Service |
$831.15 |
|
|
|
Av Truck Services Pty Ltd - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$713.68 |
|
|
|
Beaurepaires - Tyre Fitting Services |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
BP Express Currambine - Fuel For Cutter |
$15.19 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$5,907.81 |
|
|
|
Carcare Joondalup - Charge For Unsuccessful Vehicle Collection & Vehicle Services |
$618.00 |
|
|
|
Concrete Boys Poly & Hardware - Concrete Laying Tools |
$948.20 |
|
|
|
Contatore Engineering - Vehicle Repairs |
$170.50 |
|
|
|
Cooldrive Distribution - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$20.22 |
|
|
|
CSR Building Product - Building Materials |
$215.60 |
|
|
|
CSR Gyprock - Building Materials |
$97.80 |
|
|
|
Direct Fasteners - Hardware Purchases |
$107.22 |
|
|
|
Fencemakers Pty Ltd - Hardware Purchases |
$66.66 |
|
|
|
Fielders - Custom Flashing |
$687.82 |
|
|
|
Freds Hardware - Hardware Purchases |
$15.50 |
|
|
|
Hoskit - Hot Water Urn - Driver Reviver Caravan |
$319.14 |
|
|
|
Kennards Hire Pty Ltd - Equipment Waiver |
$355.00 |
|
|
|
Mammoth Equipment - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$118.66 |
|
|
|
Master Hose Pty Ltd - Hose Fittings - Core Drill |
$8.15 |
|
|
|
Midland Plasterboard - Total Joint Finish |
$27.00 |
|
|
|
MJ & SM Snow - Air Blow Gun & Test Light |
$274.23 |
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmowers - Safety Items And Water Tanks |
$657.84 |
|
|
|
NSM Sheet Metal - Flashing |
$66.00 |
|
|
|
Nuford - Vehicle Service/Repairs |
$893.00 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Stationery Items |
$238.65 |
|
|
|
Opposite Lock - Flags For Skid Steer Machines |
$693.00 |
|
|
|
Pattos Paint Shop - Paint Supplies |
$504.04 |
|
|
|
Permatech - Seal And Flex - Clarkson Skate Park |
$270.60 |
|
|
|
PLE Computers Pty Ltd - Wireless Keyboard And Mouse |
$39.00 |
|
|
|
Rexel Electrical Supplies - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$30.97 |
|
|
|
RSEA Pty Ltd - Malaga - Caution Tape Rolls |
$29.85 |
|
|
|
Microchips Australia - Microchip Scanner |
$437.30 |
|
|
|
Spotto WA - Taxi From Audi Centre Perth |
$52.34 |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning - Toilet Tissue Dispenser |
$94.09 |
|
|
|
Stratco Balcatta - Hardware Purchases |
$103.49 |
|
|
|
Swan Taxis - Taxi To Audi Centre Perth |
$55.07 |
|
|
|
Trailer Parts - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$169.78 |
|
|
|
The Flying Spanner - Tyre Repair - Light Tanker |
$385.25 |
|
|
|
The Good Guys - Inverter Sensor Microwave Oven |
$329.00 |
|
|
|
Toolmart Australia - Tool Purchases |
$1,027.65 |
|
|
|
UES International - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$4.99 |
|
|
|
Valspar - Paint Products |
$1,515.17 |
|
|
|
WA Timber Sales - Villaboard |
$59.92 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Glass - Laminated Safety Glass |
$393.00 |
|
|
|
Work Clobber - Safety Glasses & PPE |
$324.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Manager Aquamotion & Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$30.28 |
|
|
|
Dominos Pizza Woodvale - Pizzas For Grand Finals - Kingsway |
$107.10 |
|
|
|
Kmart - HDMI Cord & USB Chargers |
$51.50 |
|
|
|
Strandbags - Lifeguard Bumbags |
$149.90 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering - Impact Sales Training |
$137.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Marque Leg Weights |
$19.98 |
|
|
|
City Of Vincent - Parking Ticket - Right Tracks Co-Design Workshop |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Items - Youth Services |
$763.06 |
|
|
|
Council House - Parking Fees |
$55.53 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Materials - School Holiday Program |
$73.50 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Youth Centre Tablets |
$83.80 |
|
|
|
Red Dot Stores - School Expos 2019 |
$12.00 |
|
|
|
RUOK Limited - R U Ok Day Materials |
$36.74 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Food And Materials - Youth Services |
$26.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
JB HiFi - Projector - Clarkson Fire Station |
$807.99 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering - Level 1 IC Course |
$31.72 |
|
|
|
Subway Clarkson - Catering - Level 1 IC Course |
$106.75 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Mobile Printer And Powerbank |
$512.00 |
|
|
|
Big W - Dog Bowls - Animal Care Centre |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Aldi Stores - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$14.30 |
|
|
|
Bakers Delight - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$25.80 |
|
|
|
Coles - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$1,309.66 |
|
|
|
Conti Wines - Wine Packs For Gifts - Network Lunch |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
D&A Food Pty Ltd - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$230.00 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Materials - Youth Showcase Event & Hospitality Supplies |
$38.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Deli - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - Inhouse Catering Requests |
$313.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Arbee Craft Pty Ltd - Wooden Coat Hangers - Museum |
$32.12 |
|
|
|
Big W - Materials - Early Learning Programs & Vacuum Cleaner - Alkimos |
$224.85 |
|
|
|
Bookdepository.com - Book Club Kit Replacement |
$25.75 |
|
|
|
Booktopia Pty Ltd - Book Club Kit & Stock Purchase |
$848.15 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Trolley - All About The Past Program |
$89.00 |
|
|
|
Cleverpatch Pty Ltd - Pegs & Pipe Cleaners - Cockman House Program & Materials - Museum School Holidays |
$308.67 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Items - Program Activities |
$125.85 |
|
|
|
D.J. City - Fogging Machine - Halloween Event |
$113.00 |
|
|
|
Walking In Their Shoes - Training - Army Museum Of WA Audience Engagement - 1 Attendee |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Educational Art Supplies - Materials - Programs Activities |
$360.58 |
|
|
|
Office Line - Community Information Notice Board |
$166.10 |
|
|
|
Jaycar Clarkson - Filaments - 3D Printing |
$51.85 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Materials - Program Activities |
$266.50 |
|
|
|
Learning Discovery - Local Stock Purchase |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Museums Australia - Education Membership & Creating Education Resources For Museums Training Workshop |
$66.50 |
|
|
|
National Library Australia - Image - Migration Display |
$52.00 |
|
|
|
News Limited - Australian Newspaper Subscription |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
NSM Sheet Metal - Picture Rail Clips To Hang Artwork |
$66.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Arts Law Public Art Contract - Legal Version |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Birdwoman Construction And Workshop |
$316.80 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Try Meditation Girrawheen Library Presenter Fee |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Priceless Wanneroo - Materials - Program Activities |
$6.50 |
|
|
|
Pricesavers Joondalup - Map Of Australia |
$8.00 |
|
|
|
QBD The Bookshop - Program Resources |
$95.68 |
|
|
|
Spotify - Account Subscription |
$11.99 |
|
|
|
Spotlight - Materials - Program Activities |
$156.20 |
|
|
|
Ray & Janets Books - 4 X 2020 Monthly Calendars |
$24.00 |
|
|
|
The Cheesecake Shop - Cake Purchase - Place Management First Birthday Celebration |
$90.00 |
|
|
|
The Good Guys - Vacuum Cleaner Filter And Bags - Yanchep Library |
$39.00 |
|
|
|
Trybooking Trillion Trust - Registration - Seminar "Wonderment & Nature Connections In Urban Living" - 4 October 2019 |
$30.50 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Water Refills - Yanchep Library. |
$59.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer & Information Services |
|
|
|
|
ASIC - Current Company Information - Contracts |
$9.00 |
|
|
|
Being There - Desktop Speaker/Microphone |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Google*Cloud - Google Cloud Monthly Fee |
$92.66 |
|
|
|
IPAA - Registration - Seamless Digital Government: Improving Service Delivery For All 1 Attendee |
$525.00 |
|
|
|
Lighting Analysts Incorporated - Annual Renewal Fee Of AGI32 (Street Light Design Software) |
$1,479.65 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Stationery Items |
$48.67 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Stuffix Annual Renewal - KMP Hosted Backups And KMP Hosted |
$2,546.87 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Switch Sound Format Converter -Plus - Commercial License |
$50.17 |
|
|
|
PLE Computers Pty Ltd - 2 16GB Ram |
$258.00 |
|
|
|
Post Wanneroo - Return Incorrect Receipt Printer |
$29.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, Communications and Events |
|
|
|
|
Australian Flag Makers - Bunting - Dog's Breakfast |
$253.44 |
|
|
|
Campaignmonitor.Co - Enewsletter |
$736.65 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Advertising |
$1,021.75 |
|
|
|
Freshworks Incorporated - Commjobs Ticketing System |
$397.27 |
|
|
|
Imagazine Ag - Facebook Advertising |
$37.00 |
|
|
|
Local Direct Network - Flyer Distribution - Dog's Breakfast |
$955.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
ASIC - Company Search |
$9.00 |
|
|
|
Greenmeadows Medical - Employment Medical |
$346.50 |
|
|
|
Kmart - 9 $20 I-Reward Vouchers |
$180.00 |
|
|
|
Raine Square - Parking Fees |
$36.45 |
|
|
|
Secure Parking - Parking Fees |
$24.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchasing Cards Transactions |
$41,740.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EFT's And Purchasing Cards |
$22,897,925.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
|
113624 |
03.07.2018 |
Australian Army Cadets Association WA |
-$1,500.00 |
|
113625 |
03.07.2018 |
Gillian Gauntlett |
-$188.30 |
|
113724 |
10.07.2018 |
Lisa & John D Green |
-$2,000.00 |
|
113830 |
24.07.2018 |
H W Gerges |
-$100.00 |
|
113882 |
24.07.2018 |
Get Home Safe Limited |
-$286.88 |
|
113940 |
31.07.2018 |
Melanie Smith |
-$25.00 |
|
113951 |
31.07.2018 |
T Burns |
-$223.27 |
|
113977 |
31.07.2018 |
Disco Cantito Association |
-$150.00 |
|
114013 |
07.08.2018 |
Harry Thorsen |
-$28.00 |
|
114041 |
14.08.2018 |
Robin Shaw |
-$32.58 |
|
114043 |
14.08.2018 |
Russell McCarthy |
-$100.00 |
|
114047 |
14.08.2018 |
David Ian McNally |
-$100.00 |
|
114054 |
14.08.2018 |
Nicholas Trajkoski |
-$62.90 |
|
114084 |
14.08.2018 |
Maggies Netball Club |
-$150.00 |
|
114112 |
21.08.2018 |
Zeke Lewis |
-$12.50 |
|
114113 |
21.08.2018 |
Karis Clements |
-$100.00 |
|
114147 |
28.08.2018 |
Robert Agacy |
-$850.00 |
|
114209 |
28.08.2018 |
Ellenbrook Football Club |
-$137.50 |
|
114210 |
25.08.2018 |
A & S Butcher |
-$3,190.00 |
|
118506 |
25.11.2019 |
Meridian Aluminium Pty Ltd |
-$6,341.24 |
|
118498 |
25.11.2019 |
2 Deadly Food & Fitness |
-$700.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
-$16,278.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 1 |
|
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 2 |
|
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 3 |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce - Advertising |
$609.60 |
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory - Legal Fees |
$34,109.62 |
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
|
McLeods - Legal Fees |
$3,510.00 |
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 6 |
|
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 7 |
|
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
|
McLeods - Legal Fees |
$7,290.00 |
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.22 |
|
|
|
Cell 9 |
|
|
|
|
Strategic DCP Consulting |
$159.08 |
|
|
|
TPS Audit Fees 30.06.2019 |
$2,222.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$66,950.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANUAL JOURNAL |
|||
|
10628/2020 |
09.12.2019 |
Bank Fee Returned Creditor Payment 10.12.2019 |
$2.50 |
|
10635/2020 |
17.12.2019 |
Lodgement Fee - Registering 22 Unpaid Infringements |
$1,540.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$1,542.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL FUND BANK ACCOUNT |
|||
|
|
|
Payroll Payments - December 2019 |
|
|
|
|
03.12.2019 |
$10,528.43 |
|
|
|
03.12.2019 |
$1,759,078.92 |
|
|
|
03.12.2019 |
$12,048.73 |
|
|
|
04.12.2019 |
$65.32 |
|
|
|
05.12.2019 |
$193.31 |
|
|
|
17.12.2019 |
$16,755.27 |
|
|
|
17.12.2019 |
$32,896.80 |
|
|
|
17.12.2019 |
$1,765,945.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$3,597,511.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Recoup |
$23,418,867.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payments Total (Includes Payroll, Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$27,016,379.20 |
Property Services
File Ref: 4238V02 – 19/504729
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: CB03-02/15 - Proposed lease of Tenancy North to Tracey Cottrell, portion of Lot 101 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo - Ordinary Council - 03 Feb 2015 7.00pm
Issue
To consider entering into a lease with Tracey Cottrell (trading as Hennaberrys for Hair) (Hennaberrys) for premises at the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre (WLCC).
Background
Land and WLCC
Hennaberrys currently leases an 80m2 (approximate) portion of the WLCC from the City for the permitted use of ‘Hair Salon’.
The WLCC site, being Lot 101 on Deposited Plan 66852 (the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume 2784 Folio 44) (Lot 101) and comprising a total land area of 4,218m2 (approximate) is owned in freehold by the City.
Lot 101 is bounded by Dundebar Road, Rocca Way and Yagan Place within the Wanneroo Town Centre, and is located between the City’s Civic Centre to the north and the Wanneroo Central shopping centre to the south. The immediate vicinity comprises a number of ‘Civic and Cultural’ facilities.
Lot 101 is zoned ‘Urban’ under the Metropolitan Regional Scheme, ‘Centre’ under the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 and ‘Business’ under the Wanneroo Town Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 23.
The WLCC building has a total floor space of 5,146m2 (approximate). In addition to the tenancy occupied by Hennaberrys, the WLCC incorporates a further tenancy leased to Manumalo Pty Ltd (ACN 137 762 826) as trustee for the Agia Family Trust (Manumalo) (trading as Café Elixir) under a retail lease for the purpose of a ‘Café and Restaurant’ from a 257m2 (approximate) area. Council recently approved a new lease to Manumalo (item CS05-12/19).
Premises
Hennaberrys currently occupies the ground floor on the northern side of the WLCC (Attachment 1 refers). The tenancy comprises three wash stations, seven cutting stations, an internal ablution, front counter, and kitchenette totalling an area of 80m2 (approximate) (Premises).
Prior Lease
Further to the resolution of Council on 3 February 2015 (item CB03-02/15), the City entered into a retail lease with Hennaberrys for a single five (5) year term, commencing on 2 May 2015 (Prior Lease). The Prior Lease was executed by the City and Hennaberrys on 15 April 2015.
The Prior Lease expires on 1 May 2020, and does not have an option for renewal.
Due to the use of the Premises, the Prior Lease is subject to the requirements of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985 (WA) (Retail Shops Act).
Detail
Administration proposes to enter into a new five (5) year lease with one option of a further five (5) year term with Hennaberrys, subject to Council approval of the essential lease terms and in accordance with:
· the disposal requirements under section 3.58 of the Act; and
· the requirements of the Retail Shops Act.
The proposed new lease will be a ‘private treaty’ agreement, in accordance with the following essential terms:
|
Lessee: |
Hennaberrys |
|
Lease Area (approximately 80m2): |
Portion of Lot 101 being an area of approximately 80m² (as per the current lease area) to Hennaberrys. |
|
Permitted Purpose: |
Hair Salon |
|
Term: |
Five (5) years |
|
Option (Additional Term): |
One option - Five (5) years |
|
Commencement Date: |
2 May 2020 (the date following expiry of the Prior Lease, 1 May 2020). It is anticipated the new lease will be executed by the parties prior to the Prior Lease expiring and therefore the will commence immediately after the expiry of the Prior Lease. |
|
Rental: |
$24,000 (plus GST) per annum
In accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy, Hennaberrys is categorised as a ‘Retail’ entity, being a non-exempt disposition under the Local Government Act 1995. On this basis, the rent is to be negotiated at market rate.
A licensed valuer was appointed to determine the current market rental of Tenancy North. A valuation report dated 27 November 2019 determined a rent of $300.00/m² per annum (plus GST) over the lettable area of 80m2 was suggested. This equates to a figure of $24,000 per annum (plus GST).
The rent is a net amount, with outgoings and other charges separately payable by Hennaberrys. |
|
Market Rent Review: |
Commencement of the Additional Term. |
|
Annual Rent Review: |
Fixed 3% rental increase per annum during the Term and the Additional Term (other than on a Market Rent Review date). |
|
Bond: |
The City already holds a bond of $5,000 under the Prior Lease. This bond will be retained under the new lease. The bond is held in a non-interest bearing account. |
|
Outgoings: |
Electricity - sub metered and the responsibility of Hennaberrys |
|
Rates & Taxes: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility – Commercial Council rates and Emergency Services Levy and any other rates, taxes, assessments and impositions |
|
Public Liability Insurance: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility - $20 million minimum |
|
Other Insurances: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility - Plate Glass, Workers Compensation, Breakdown Insurance and Property Damage Cover |
|
Cleaning: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility |
|
Signage: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility subject to the City’s Signage Policy or approval of relevant development applications |
|
Compliance: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility |
|
Pest Control: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility |
Special conditions:
|
Building Insurance: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility for any insurance excess, deductable or shortfall payable by the City for any insurance claim made concerning the Premises. |
|
Quiet Enjoyment: |
The City has the care, control and management of the Premises and land in the immediate vicinity, together with other roads and reserves. The City may need to undertake essential works that may impact on Hennaberry’s business. Restrictions (not limited to): disruption to utilities; disruption or closure of roads, reserves and road reserves; pedestrian movement and access; vehicle movement, access and parking; vibration and noise; and dust and dirt. As a result, the City or its agents and contractor works will not be considered as having breached Hennaberry’s “quiet enjoyment” of the Premises and the City will not be liable to compensate Hennaberrys. |
|
Lessor Works 1): |
The lease will confirm that the City will undertake the following works (in accordance with Australian Standards or respective manufacturers recommendations, and using the City’s appointed contractors) at the sole cost of Hennaberry’s:
a) Fire equipment compliance servicing:
- inspection and testing of Fire Indicator Panels and EWIS systems; and
- inspection, testing, tagging of extinguishers, fire blankets, hose reels and hydrants.
b) Electrical:
- testing of residual current devices (RCDs);
- testing of emergency and exit lighting; and
- any required electrical works at the Premises required by Hennaberrys to be undertaken by the City’s contractor. |
|
Lessor Works 2): |
The lease will confirm that the City will undertake the following works (in accordance with Australian Standards or respective manufacturers recommendations, and using the City’s appointed contractors) at the sole cost of the City:
- Maintenance of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and any required capital work replacement. |
|
Cleaning and Maintenance: |
Hennaberry’s obligations to clean and maintain the Premises will include (but not be limited to):
a) Maintenance and general upkeep of the Premises (including the Existing Fitout (as defined in the lease)), but not limited to the doors and plate glass and external signage; and
b) Cleaning the Premises including the external glass and fascias. |
|
Flooring and Walls: |
Hennaberry’s responsibility to maintain the flooring and walls of the Premises and undertake and meet the cost of any associated capital works/replacement. |
Consultation
The essential terms for the proposed lease have been negotiated between the City and Hennaberrys as outlined in this report.
It is proposed that, subject to Council approval of the essential terms, formal lease documentation (including the disclosure documents required for compliance with the Retail Shops Act) will be prepared in-house and provided to Hennaberrys for its consideration.
Comment
Administration recommends the proposed new lease of the Premises to Hennaberrys as outlined in this report.
The lease would not be an exempt disposition under the Act. If Council resolves to approve the proposed lease in-principle, it will be necessary to publish a local notice of the proposed disposal inviting public submissions.
Should any submissions be received, Administration recommends that no further report is presented to Council and that the CEO be authorised to consider and reject any submissions, negotiate lease terms and effect any documentation relating to it to enable a timely and expedient resolution.
Statutory Compliance
The public notice of the proposed disposition will comply with the requirements of Section 3.58 of the Act.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“2 Economy
2.1 Local Jobs
2.1.1 Develop strong economic hubs locally and near transport”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Asset Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The proposed lease has been negotiated in accordance with the ‘Retail’ category as outlined in Annexure 1 of the City's Leasing Policy.
A report to Council is required as a disposal by lease under Delegation 1.1.21 (Disposing of Property by Lease or Licence) is not permissible as the proposed lease term (including options for renewal) is greater than five (5) years.
Financial Implications
· The proposed lease will generate an income stream to the City of $24,000.00 (plus GST) per annum plus outgoings for the initial five (5) year term;
· Fixed annual rental increases of 3% will apply throughout the initial five (5) year term;
· The rent will be reviewed to market at the commencement of the proposed option period, should Hennaberrys exercise the option for an additional term of five (5) years;
· Council rates will be payable by Hennaberrys for the duration of the lease;
· The changes to the Retail Shops Act, effective 1 January 2013 prohibit landlords from claiming legal expenses relating to the preparation, negotiation or execution of leases and associated documentation. The City’s in-house lawyer will prepare and finalise the City’s existing standard retail lease template at nil charge;
· The City will incur a fee of $1,000 (plus GST) (approximate) for publishing a public notice in the Wanneroo Times; and
· The City will recover charges for electricity directly metered to the Premises, a small proportion of water rates assessed against the Centre and Council rates as assessed against the Premises.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES, in principle, a retail lease of an 80m2 portion (approximate) of Lot 101 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo between the City of Wanneroo and Tracey Cottrell (trading as Hennaberrys for Hair) for a term of five (5) years with one option of a further five (5) year term commencing on 2 May 2020;
2. AUTHORISES:
a) The publication of a local public notice of the intention to dispose of the portion of Lot 101 (3) Rocca Way, Wanneroo in accordance with Item 1. above in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (WA); and
b) The Chief Executive Officer to negotiate commercial terms, execute all documentation, consider and reject any submissions and comply with all applicable legislation as is required to effect Item 1. above; and
3. AUTHORISES the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the retail lease between the City of Wanneroo and Tracey Cottrell (trading as Hennaberrys for Hair) in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Tenancy North Lease Area Plan 2015 |
15/5617 |
|
Council & Corporate Support
File Ref: 5153 – 20/23467
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: 3.1 - 2018/19 Annual Report - Electors AGM - 09 Dec 2019 6.00pm
Issue
To consider Motions received at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Electors, held on 9 December 2019.
Background
Section 5.33(1) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that all decisions made at an Annual General Meeting of Electors are to be considered at the next Ordinary Council Meeting or, if that is not practicable, at the first Ordinary Council Meeting after that meeting or at a Special Council Meeting called for that purpose, whichever occurs first.
Detail
No motions were received in writing prior to the meeting or from the floor for the AGM of Electors held on 9 December 2019. Council is therefore requested to accept the minutes from this meeting as detailed in Attachment 1.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Nil
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1955 – Part 5 – Administration. Division 2 – Council meetings, committees and their meetings and electors’ meetings. Subdivision 1 – Council meetings.
Section 5.33 - Decisions made at electors’ meetings.
“(1) All decisions made at an electors’ meeting are to be considered at the next ordinary council meeting or, if that is not practicable –
(a) at the first ordinary council meeting after that meeting; or
(b) at a special meeting called for that purpose, whichever happens first.
(2) If at a meeting of the council a local government makes a decision in response to a decision made at an electors’ meeting, the reasons for the decision are to be recorded in the minutes of the council meeting.”
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the minutes of the Annual General Meeting of Electors held on 9 December 2019.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Minutes of Annual General Meeting of Electors - 9 December 2019 |
20/23460 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 10 February, 2020 622
File Ref: 2856V011 – 20/4445
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider requests for sponsorships, donations and waiver of fees in accordance with the City’s Donations, Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications over $500 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received nil sponsorship requests, one community donation request and one request for a waiver of fees and charges, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Council Support upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
Nil
Community Group Donations
|
Applicant 1 – Lions Cancer Institute |
|
|
Request amount |
$5,300.00 |
|
Description of request |
A donation for fifty-three special needs children and children with cancer from Burbridge School, Koondoola to attend the special Children’s Christmas Big Day Out held on 21 December 2019 in Wanneroo. |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Nil |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
Registered Charity |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
For fifty-three special needs children and children with cancer from Burbridge School, Koondoola. |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Objective 1.1 – Healthy and active people – we get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle. |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Not stated. |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
Not stated. |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
$1,000.00 – CS08-04/14 Donation for ten special needs children from City of Wanneroo to attend the Special Children’s' Big Day Out. $1,000.00 – CS04-02/15 Donation for ten special needs children from City of Wanneroo to attend the Special Children’s' Big Day Out. $2,000.00 - CS04/07/16 Donation for twenty special needs children from the City of Wanneroo to attend the Special Children’s’ Big Day Out. $2,000.00 – CS06-12/18 Donation for fifty special needs children from the City of Wanneroo to attend the Special Children’s Day Out. |
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Comments |
The cost per child to attend is $100 which includes a professional carer, refreshments and entertainment. As this request is for students from Burbridge School, Clause 5.4 applies as follows: “ ...funding will be to a maximum of $2,000.00 per school, per financial year to support students attending events”. Therefore, in accordance with Policy, it is recommended to approve the maximum amount outlined within the Policy which is also consistent with past donations (the difference being $2,300 less than the requested amount). |
|
Recommendation |
APPROVE the sum of $2,000.00 to the Lions Cancer Institute for fifty-three special needs children or children with cancer from Burbridge School, Koondoola to attend the Special Children’s' Christmas Big Day Out held in three venues, South Perth, Belmont and Perth CBD on 21 December 2019. |
|
Reason |
This recommendation is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
|
Applicant 2 – Narcotics Anonymous |
|
|
Request amount |
$855.40 |
|
Description of request |
100% waiver of fees for the hire of Yanchep Community Centre to hold Friday night Narcotics Anonymous meetings from 3 January – 20 November 2020. |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Nil |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
Not for Profit |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Addicts seeking recovery |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Objective 1.1 – Healthy and active people – we get active in our local area and we have many opportunities to experience a healthy lifestyle. |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Nil |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
$10.00 per week which equates to $470.00 based on 47 weeks hire of Yanchep Community Centre. |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Nil |
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Not stated |
|
Comments |
Clause 4.3 of the Donations Sponsorships and Waiver of Fees and Charges Policy outlines consideration of requests for waiver of fees and applies to this request as follows: “Only 50% of the amount charged for a waiver of fees will be considered with the exception of State or Federal functions and visits by Parliamentarians held within the City”. Therefore, in accordance with Policy, it is recommended to approve the maximum amount outlined within the Policy (the difference being $42.30 less than requested). |
|
Recommendation |
APPROVE a 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $427.70 to Narcotics Anonymous for the hire of Yanchep Community Centre to hold Friday night Narcotics Anonymous meetings from 3 January – 20 November 2020. |
|
Reason |
This recommendation is in accordance with Council’s Policy. |
Perth African Nations Football Council Inc.
At the Ordinary Council meeting held on 10 December 2019 Council approved the sum of $4,399.00 as a 50% waiver of fees to Perth African Nations Football Council Inc. for the hire of Koondoola Park – Main Oval and Kingsway Regional Sports Complex from 15 November 2019 to 9 February 2020 for the Perth African Nations Cup (CS07-12/19).
Since that Council resolution, a number of cancellations to the facility booking have been made by the Perth African Nations Football Council (due to the lack of attendance at Kingsway Soccer pitches and the Koondoola Park) which has subsequently reduced the overall facility hire fee for this event. The total hire fee for bookings during the specified period is now $4,339.70 meaning the revised 50% waiver of fees needs to equate to $2,169.85.
Administration is seeking approval from Council to adjust the waiver of fees previously granted to the Perth African Nations Football Council Inc. to reflect the reduction in bookings.
In accordance with Policy, Council is therefore requested to NOTE that the overall fees payable by the Perth African Nations Cup has reduced due to their cancelled facility bookings, and APPROVE an adjustment to the waiver of fees previously approved at the 10 December 2019 Ordinary Council meeting (item CS07-12/19) to the revised amount of $2,169.85 to cover the 50% waiver of fees for the hire of Koondoola Park – Main Oval and Kingsway Regional Sports Complex from 15 November 2019 to 9 February 2020.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four teams) and Regional or State capped at $600 per club. International events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2019/2020 |
|
$120,000.00 |
|
Amount expended to date (as at 17 January 2020) |
|
$95,496.74 |
|
Balance |
|
$24,503.26 |
|
Total of requests for this round: Donations (in this report):
Total this Round (recommended)
*If approved as recommended $2,229.15 should be deducted from the expenditure to date to reflect a return in funds. |
$6,155.40 |
$2,427.70 |
|
BALANCE |
|
$22,075.56 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVE the sum of $2,000.00 to the Lions Cancer Institute for fifty-three special needs children or children with cancer from Burbridge School, Koondoola to attend the Special Children’s' Christmas Big Day Out held in three venues, South Perth, Belmont and Perth CBD on 21 December 2019;
2. APPROVE a 50% waiver of fees in the sum of $427.70 to Narcotics Anonymous for the hire of Yanchep Community Centre to hold Friday night Narcotics Anonymous meetings from 3 January – 20 November 2020; and
3. NOTE that the overall fees payable by the Perth African Nations Cup has reduced due to their cancelled facility bookings, and APPROVE an adjustment to the waiver of fees previously approved at the 10 December 2019 Ordinary Council meeting (item CS07-12/19) to the revised amount of $2,169.85 to cover the 50% waiver of fees for the hire of Koondoola Park – Main Oval and Kingsway Regional Sports Complex from 15 November 2019 to 9 February 2020.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Donation request Lions Cancer Institute |
20/8434 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Donation request Narcotics Anonymous |
20/8408 |
|
Chief Executive Office
File Ref: 2409V02 – 20/32895
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
The reforms to the Local Government Act 1995 as adopted through the Local Government Legislation Amendment Act 2019 provide a new framework for the receipt of gifts and declaration of interest by Council Members and the Chief Executive Officer. The framework also requires that Council adopt a policy in relation to the attendance of Council Members and the CEO at events such as concerts, conferences and functions.
Background
The new framework enacted in October 2019 focusses on transparency and accountability by considering the nature of the relationship between the recipient and the donor of the gift, with a particular focus on the disclosure requirements relating to why the person has received the gift and dealing with the possible influence created by the gift by the disclosure of interest provisions.
Although legislation has been amended to include the requirement that interests need to be declared relating to the receipt of gifts, the Local Government Act 1995 has not changed regarding the declaration of interests that affect a person’s ability to remain impartial by virtue of a personal relationship, membership of an association or receipt of a gift.
Detail
Certain gifts received by Council Members and the CEO valued at over $300 are specifically excluded from the disclosure of interest provisions, such as those received from specified entities, including a gift that is received in accordance with a Council adopted “Attendance at Events” policy.
Principally Council needs to consider when adopting the “Attendance at Events” policy, what the benefits are to the community or the local government in having Council Members and the CEO attend certain events. The policy provides a framework for the acceptance of invitations to various events, clarifies who will pay for tickets or the equivalent value of the invitation, the predominant purpose being to enable Council Members and the CEO to attend events as representatives of Council (in respect of Council Members) or of the City (in respect of the CEO) without restricting their ability to participate in Council meetings and the decision making process. It is not intended to be used as a mechanism to avoid disclosure of interest provisions where significant matters are likely to come before Council that relate to the provider of the tickets or invitation to an event.
Tickets or invitations to events should be provided to the local government and not individual Council Members. A ticket or invitation provided by a donor to an individual in their capacity as a Council Member or CEO is to be treated as a gift to that person (and will be subject to the disclosure of interest provisions) unless the tickets or invitation are referred to the local government and can be considered in accordance with Council’s adopted policy.
Excluded gifts are still a gift that must be disclosed and published in the City’s gifts register if over the value of $300 and received in the capacity of being a Council Member or the CEO.
Consultation
Other comparable local government policies, the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries guidelines and draft template were reviewed in preparing the proposed policy.
Comment
Council Members and the CEO are expected to make decisions in the best interests of the community and consider each issue on its merits. Fair, equitable and uncompromised decision-making may be influenced, or perceived to be influenced through financial relationships, personal relationships and the receipt of gifts.
Council, being accountable to the local community, is in the best position to determine the design and content of the “Attendance at Events” policy and is to actively consider the purpose of and benefits to the community when approving Council Members and CEO’s attendance at events.
The proposed draft policy is included at Attachment 1.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Act 1995
5.90A. Policy for attendance at events
(1) In this section —
event includes the following —
(a) a concert;
(b) a conference;
(c) a function;
(d) a sporting event;
(e) an occasion of a kind prescribed for the purposes of this definition.
(2) A local government must prepare and adopt* a policy that deals with matters relating to the attendance of council members and the CEO at events, including —
(a) the provision of tickets to events; and
(b) payments in respect of attendance; and
(c) approval of attendance by the local government and criteria for approval; and
(d) any prescribed matter.
* Absolute majority required.
(3) A local government may amend* the policy.
* Absolute majority required.
(4) When preparing the policy or an amendment to the policy, the local government must comply with any prescribed requirements relating to the form or content of a policy under this section.
(5) The CEO must publish an up-to-date version of the policy on the local government’s official website.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
C0-C01 – Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register and aligns with the guidelines provided by the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries. Policies and Procedures have been or are currently being developed to manage the risk.
Policy Implications
It is a legislative requirement to adopt an “Attendance at Events” policy for the acceptance of invitations by Council Members and the CEO to various events and to clarify who will pay for tickets or the equivalent value of the invitation, the purpose being to enable Council Members to attend events as a representative of Council without restricting their ability to participate in Council meetings and the decision making process.
Financial Implications
While attending events is generally considered an important function for Council Members and the CEO to represent the local government, if there are costs involved, especially significant costs, it can lead to criticism from the community for spending ratepayer’s money if the tangible benefits are not identified. Similarly, if Council is accepting tickets, including those as a result of sponsorship, there can be a perception of bias when matters affecting that organisation come before Council.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council ADOPT BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the “Attendance at Events Policy (Council Members and CEO)” as set out in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Attendance at Events Policy (Council Members and CEO) |
20/1170 |
Minuted |
Item 9 Motions on Notice
File Ref: 3120V03 – 20/17729
Author: Cr Brett Treby
Action Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider measures to reduce instances of poor driver behaviour and improve road safety on Azelia Street, Alexander Heights.
Background
The community has expressed concerns regarding speeding traffic, hooning and related road safety issues on Azelia Street, Alexander Heights, including reports of a recent crash on 4 January 2020 at the Azelia Street/The Avenue intersection.
Attachment 1 shows a location plan of the area.
Detail
Azelia Street is classified as a Local Distributor Road and operates under the default built-up-area speed limit of 50 km/h. The road loops around to connect with The Avenue at either end with the intersection configurations being; a roundabout at the southern end and a T-intersection at the northern end. The section of Azelia Street south of Errina Road is approximately 7.3m wide with narrow median islands installed south of Hillcrest Road. The section of Azelia Street north of Errina Road is approximately 10.0m wide without any traffic treatments.
Administration has collected traffic data for Azelia Street and conducted a review in accordance with the City’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy (LATMP). Although the scores for Azelia Street indicates that it does not qualify for traffic treatments under the LATMP, the traffic data for Azelia Street shows the 54% of vehicles are travelling above the 50km/h speed limit with an 85th percentile speed of 58 km/h.
The crash data for Azelia Street provided by Administration indicates a total of eight crashes for the four year period 2014-2018. Of these, one crash occurred at the northern intersection with The Avenue (T-intersection); one crash was at the Errina Road intersection (T-intersection), three crashes at the southern intersection with The Avenue (roundabout) and three crashes in between intersections.
Consultation
No formal community consultation has been undertaken with residents on this matter to date. Should Council support the development of a traffic management scheme for Azelia Street, engagement with the community can be identified and undertaken in accordance with the City’s Community Engagement Policy.
Comment
In view of the concerns expressed by the community, it is appropriate that Administration develops a suitable traffic management scheme for implementation on the section of Azelia Street (north) between Errina Road and The Avenue for inclusion in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program.
The development of a traffic management scheme should consider the existing road environment, pedestrian and traffic safety concerns, identification of suitable traffic management devices and their location in Azelia Street; and associated costs.
To provide best value to the community, it will be appropriate to seek external funding opportunities for improvements to Azelia Street such as the State and National Black Spot Program.
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability & Director Assets |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O23 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans are in place/have been developed to manage/mitigate this risk.
Policy Implications
The City’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy is used by the City to identify and prioritise the installation of traffic treatments where they provide greatest benefit to the community.
Financial Implications
The cost of a suitable traffic management scheme is dependent on the proposed treatments and scope of works required and is not known at this stage. Suitable treatments are dependent on road layout, location of driveways & intersections and the locations of utility services. The development of a suitable traffic management scheme as recommended in this Motion will include the preparation of a cost estimate and an assessment of external funding opportunities.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. REQUESTS Administration to develop a suitable traffic management scheme for implementation in Azelia Street (north) between Errina Road and the Avenue; and lists it for consideration for inclusion in the City’s Long Term Capital Works Program as part of the next review of the Long Term Financial Plan; and
2. REQUESTS Administration to seek external funding opportunities such as the Main Roads WA Black Spot Program to implement a suitable traffic management scheme for implementation in Azelia Street.
Azelia Street is constructed with two geometrically distinct sections, to the north and to the south of the Errina Road intersection. The southern section is approximately 7.3m wide and has a raised and painted median along a portion of the section (Hillcrest Road to The Avenue). Under the City’s LATMP, this section of Azelia Street currently has a Traffic Management Score (TMS) of 17. Given the narrow road environment and the presence of the existing median treatment, it is considered that this section of Azelia Street (Hillcrest Road to The Avenue) does not require installation of additional traffic treatments. Should some form of additional traffic treatment be considered for this section, it would need to be in the form of vertical deflection devices such as speed humps.
The northern section of Azelia Street constructed as a 10.0m wide single carriageway. Under the City’s LATMP, this section of Azelia Street has a Traffic Management Score (TMS) of 39. As the road is much wider and more open in this section, it would be possible to install a 3.0m wide median treatment with street trees and additional pedestrian crossing points. If feasible, this type of treatment would provide clear amenity benefits to the community in terms of additional tree canopy and improved pedestrian connectivity while providing road safety benefits through creating a more enclosed environment and providing narrower, better defined traffic lanes.
Administration has also received previous requests from the community regarding speeding and hooning and requests for traffic treatments & improvements to pedestrian crossing facilities on Azelia Street along the northern section.
Administration will be able to explore external funding opportunities to make safety improvements on Azelia Street through grant funding noting that grants are merit based and in order to be successful, there are selection criteria which will need to be met.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Azelia Street, Landsdale Area Map |
20/24255 |
|
Item 10 Urgent Business
File Ref: 39361 – 19/447647
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
File Ref: 3836 – 20/43230
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting
Item 12 Date of Next Meeting
The next Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6:00pm on Tuesday 3 March 2020, to be held at Council Chambes, Civic Centre, 23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
