BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held in
the Council Chamber (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
on 08 December, 2020 commencing at 6:00pm
BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held in
the Council Chamber (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
on 08 December, 2020 commencing at 6:00pm
PROCEDURE FOR FULL COUNCIL BRIEFING SESSION
COVID-19 Pandemic Situation
The City of Wanneroo is committed to ensuring the safety of all attendees at public meetings. Therefore, social distancing will be applied in the Council Chambers in accordance with State Government Regulations.
The capacity of the Council Chambers is restricted under these conditions and should the maximum capacity of the Chambers be exceeded, additional seating will be available in an alternative room to enable all public attendees to listen live to the audio (only) of the meeting (no video is available). Should the maximum capacity be exceeded, you may be asked to attend the alternative room and may not be able to enter the Chambers as required by current State Government Regulations.
Thank you for your understanding of these circumstances.
PRINCIPLES
A Council Briefing occurs a week prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting and provides an opportunity for Council Members to ask questions and clarify issues relevant to the specific agenda items before council. The Briefing is not a decision-making forum and the Council has no power to make decisions. The Briefing Session will not be used, except in an emergency, as a venue or forum through which to invoke the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and call a Special Meeting of Council.
In order to ensure full transparency the meetings will be open to the public to observe the process. Where matters are of a confidential nature, they will be deferred to the conclusion of the Briefing and at that point, the Briefing Session closed to the public. The reports provided are the Officers’ professional opinions. Whilst it is acknowledged that Council Members may raise issues that have not been considered in the formulation of the report and recommendation, it is a basic principle that as part of the Briefing Sessions Council Members cannot direct Officers to change their reports or recommendations.
PROCESS
The Briefing Session will commence at 6.00pm and will be chaired by the Mayor or in his/her absence the Deputy Mayor. In the absence of both, Councillors will elect a Chairperson from amongst those present. In general, the Standing Orders Local Law 2008 will apply, EXCEPT THAT Council Members may speak more than once on any item, there is no moving or seconding items, Officer’s will address the Council Members and the order of business will be as follows:
Members of the public present may observe the process and there is an opportunity at the conclusion of the Briefing for a Public Question Time where members of the public may ask questions (no statements) relating only to the business on the Agenda. The Agenda will take the form of:
· Attendance and Apologies
· Declarations of Interest
· Reports for discussion
· Tabled Items
· Public Question Time
· Closure
Where an interest is involved in relation to an item, the same procedure which applies to Ordinary Council Meetings will apply. It is a breach of the City’s Code of Conduct for an interest to not be declared. The Briefing Session will consider items on the Agenda only and proceed to deal with each item as they appear. The process will be for the Mayor to call each item number in sequence and ask for questions. Where there are no questions regarding the item, the Briefing will proceed to the next item.
AGENDA CONTENTS
While every endeavour is made to ensure that all items to be presented to Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting are included in the Briefing Session papers, it should be noted that there will be occasions when, due to necessity, items will not be ready in time for the Briefing Session and will go straight to the full Council Agenda as a matter for decision. Further, there will be occasions when items are TABLED at the Briefing Session rather than the full report being provided in advance. In these instances, staff will endeavour to include the item on the Agenda as a late item, noting that a report will be tabled at the agenda Briefing Session.
AGENDA DISTRIBUTION
The Council Briefing Session Agenda will be distributed to Council Members on the FRIDAY prior to the Council Briefing Session. Copies will be made on the City’s website for interested members of the public. Spare Briefing Session papers will be available at the Briefing Session for interested members of the public.
DEPUTATIONS
Deputations will generally not be heard prior to the Council Briefing Session and are reserved for prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting.
RECORD OF BRIEFING
The formal record of the Council Briefing Session will be limited to notes regarding any agreed action to be taken by staff or Council Members. No recommendations will be included and the notes will be retained for reference and are not distributed to Council Members or the public.
LOCATION
The Council Briefing Session will take place in the Council Chamber at the Civic Centre.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 I
Briefing Papers for Tuesday 8 December, 2020
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
3.2 East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Developer Contribution Arrangements - Annual Review of Costs (2020-2021)
3.3 Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan - Annual Review of Costs (2020-2021)
3.4 Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan - Annual Review of Costs (2020)
3.5 Consideration of Actions Relating to Developer Contribution Arrangements
3.6 Consideration of revised Local Planning Policy 3.1 - Local Housing Strategy Implementation
3.7 Proposed Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones
3.8 Proposed Local Planning Policy No. 2.9: Service Stations and Roadhouses
3.10 Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to the Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84
3.11 Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program Extension
3.12 Metropolitan Regional Road Program 2020/21 - Grant Offer and Budget Variation
3.14 Review of Arts Advisory Committee and Terms of Reference
Corporate Strategy & Performance
3.16 Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 October 2020
3.17 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 October 2020
3.20 Project Update - Old Yanchep Surf Club Redevelopment
3.23 Functions and Operations of the Audit and Risk Committee - Terms of Reference
3.24 Corporate Risk Profile Update
3.25 Tender 20189 for the Provision of Internal Audit Services for a Period of Three Financial Years
Item 5_____ Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
5.1 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 30 November 2020
5.2 Terms of Reference - Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Redevelopment Community Advisory Group
Item 6_____ Public Question Time
Item 8_____ Date of Next Meeting
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 1
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region.
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
3.1 Consideration of Draft Amendment No. 173 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 and Draft Local Development Plan - Koondoola Neighbourhood Centre
File Ref: 3678V02 – 20/476018
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
For Council to consider the draft Local Development Plan (LDP) and Scheme Amendment No. 173 to the District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) for the Koondoola Neighbourhood Centre (the Centre), following public advertising.
Background
The Centre is comprised of five separate land parcels, including the existing Koondoola Plaza, a service station, tavern and Church. The City owns land (Lot 250) directly north of Koondoola Plaza.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 11 December 2018 (PS04-12/18), Council resolved to initiate Amendment No. 173 to the City’s DPS 2 to rezone Lot 250 from the ‘Civic and Cultural’ Zone to the ‘Commercial’ Zone, and recode the Centre from a residential density of ‘R20’ to ‘R60’ consistent with the surrounding residential land.
Furthermore, Council resolved to seek approval from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) to prepare a LDP for the subject land, with the intent to guide the future land use planning and development of the site. Permission was received from the WAPC earlier in the year to prepare a LDP and advertise Amendment No. 173.
Detail
Amendment No. 173
Amendment No. 173 proposes to rezone Lot 250 from ‘Civic and Cultural’ Zone to ‘Commercial’ Zone, and to recode the Centre from a residential density code of ‘R20’ to ‘R60’.
Rezoning the City-owned land to ‘Commercial’ Zone will allow for a wider range of land uses than can currently be developed under a ‘Civic and Cultural’ zone (refer to Attachment 1). The Amendment will ensure the zoning and density coding of the Centre is appropriate to support future revitalisation.
Net Lettable Area
The draft LDP facilitates major retail development to be focussed within Koondoola Plaza (Lot 252) subject to it not exceeding the maximum Net Lettable Area (NLA) permitted. The City’s DPS 2 currently limits Koondoola Plaza’s (Lot 252 only) retail NLA to a maximum of 3,000m². A Retail Needs Assessment report undertaken by Administration has indicated that the maximum NLA permitted has been achieved; therefore, no additional retail floor space would be able to be accommodated in the Koondoola Plaza.
Should a future retail needs assessment identify that additional NLA be required for Koondoola Plaza in the future, a separate Scheme Amendment to DPS 2 will be required to increase the maximum NLA permitted.
Local Development Plan
The draft LDP sets out the objectives and corresponding design standards for future land use planning and development of the Centre, which will guide the assessment of Development Applications and provide the planning context for the City’s investment in the Centre.
The intent of the draft LDP is to facilitate the transformation of the Centre into an attractive, safe and contemporary neighbourhood centre.
The draft LDP allows for a flexible approach to the redevelopment of the Centre, with an ability for the City-owned land or public realm improvements to be developed independently of the remainder of the Centre if this is required to facilitate the revitalisation of the Centre.
The draft LDP outlines key planning and design standards that will apply to any new development proposed to occur within the subject land (refer to Attachment 2) as follows:
· Landscaping Standards – To improve the visual amenity of the Centre through possible tree retention and a landscaping plan prepared to the satisfaction of the City;
· Residential Standards – To facilitate the development of medium density housing within the Centre, consistent with the surrounding area’s ‘R20/R60’ dual density residential coding;
· Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Standards – To address the existing social and amenity issues, including anti-social behaviour, through suitable lighting, natural surveillance, and place activation;
· Vehicle Access Standards – To facilitate safe pedestrian and vehicle movement, through the provision of shared road principles, and an east-west vehicle access road through the City-owned land; and
· Public Open Space (POS) Standards – To facilitate opportunities for community-based activities through the development of public open space and a public plaza.
Consultation
The draft LDP and Amendment No. 173 were advertised pursuant to Regulation 38 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations), for public comment for a period of 60 days from 17 September to 18 November 2020. The advertising process for both documents was as follows:
· Advertising notices in a local newspaper;
· Letters to Koondoola residents and property owners within a 250m radius of the subject land;
· Notice given on the City’s ‘Your Say’ page providing the community with the details of the proposed changes;
· Displacing notices of the proposal in Council offices; and
· A drop-in information session for Koondoola Neighbourhood Centre landowners at the Koondoola Community Centre.
On 29 September 2020, Administration held an information session for the Koondoola Neighbourhood Centre landowners to explain the City’s proposed approach to the revitalisation of the centre. A total of seven strata owners (Lot 252) attended the session; however, no landowners from Lot 251, 253 and 155 attended.
The key concern raised by the strata owners during this session was in regards to the perception that the change of zoning of the City-owned land to ‘Commercial’ would result in further retail development within the centre which would lead to commercial competition. Attendees were encouraged to make formal submissions during the advertising process.
The City received three submissions, one that was in support of the proposed revitalisation strategies for the Centre, and two (including one joint submission on behalf of the majority of the Koondoola Plaza landowners) which did not support the proposed Scheme Amendment and LDP. The submitter’s comments have been addressed in full as part of the Schedule of Submissions, and the key concerns are summarised in the comment section below (refer to Attachment 3).
The Scheme Amendment requires Council approval, before being forwarded to the WAPC for Ministerial approval and subsequent gazettal. In accordance with the Regulations, the LDP only requires Council approval and does not require WAPC approval.
Comment
Proposed Commercial Rezoning Concerns
The City received a joint submission from the majority of the strata owners of Koondoola Plaza. Their submission unequivocally opposes the rezoning of the City-owned land, on the basis that the proposed ‘Commercial’ zoning of the City-owned land would result in competing retail development from larger businesses, which would compete with their established businesses.
An additional submission was received from Element on behalf of Perron Investments Pty Ltd (Perron), the owners of The Square Mirrabooka Shopping Centre, located outside the City’s boundary. This submission raised specific concerns regarding the lack of controls and certainty regarding the future shop/ retail floor space applied to Lot 250.
As outlined in the Scheme Amendment (refer to Attachment 4), it is not the City’s intention as part of this Amendment to increase the shop /retail floor space for the Centre, which will remain at 3,000m² NLA.
The purpose of the Scheme Amendment and associated LDP is to facilitate the revitalisation of the Centre. This will in part be achieved by ensuring that a wider range of land uses are permissible on the City-owned land that complement existing retail activity to improve the vitality of the Centre, rather than compete with it. The proposed ‘Commercial’ zoning is considered appropriate in this regard because of the wider range of land uses (e.g. retirement village, office uses etc.) that are able to be permitted under this specific zone, and which are not currently permitted under the ‘Civic and Cultural’ zoning designation.
Additionally, Koondoola Plaza (Lot 252) is currently capped at a maximum NLA of 3,000m² in the City’s DPS 2. The Scheme wording used to describe Koondoola Plaza currently implies that the activity centre is only comprised of Lot 252. This was as a result of the City-owned land being zoned ‘Civic and Cultural’ at the time, a zoning designation, which does not support 'shop’ or other retail uses and which was therefore not considered to form part of the Centre’s commercial core.
The City acknowledges that the Centre description as worded currently in the Scheme can be considered ambiguous. Therefore, while it is not the City’s intention to increase the retail cap of the Centre, and for the purpose of providing clarity, it is proposed that DPS 2 Schedule 3 be modified to include Lot 250 (20) Burbridge Avenue, Koondoola (the City-owned land) to form part of the Centre description as part of this amendment.
This means that in the event that any landowner in the future would wish to increase the maximum retail NLA for the Centre (which would not include the City-owned land), this would require a Retail Needs Assessment in accordance with revised draft State Planning Policy 4.2: Activity Centres for Perth and Peel (SPP4.2), followed by a separate Scheme Amendment to DPS2.
The City has reviewed and investigated the concerns raised by the submitters, against the relevant State planning policies, the Regulations and the City’s DPS 2. Additionally, over the past twenty years, the City has engaged with the Koondoola Plaza strata owners several times to find an appropriate approach to the Centre’s revitalisation. However, due to a lack of support by the owners for any proposed approach, no progress has been made in achieving an appropriate solution. This Scheme Amendment and LDP are considered appropriate planning mechanisms in achieving the revitalisation of the Centre.
It is recommended that Amendment No. 173 and LDP be adopted by Council as proposed, with the following modification:
· Amending Schedule 3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to include Lot 250 (20) Burbridge Avenue, Koondoola at Koondoola (Koondoola Plaza) as part of the centre description.
Statutory Compliance
The DPS 2 amendment and LDP have been prepared and progressed in accordance with the process prescribed in the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.1 Create local area land use plans supporting our activated places”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
The City will ensure that there are appropriate governance arrangements in place to ensure a separation between the City’s role as a planning authority and the City’s role as a landowner and developer of the City-owned land.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As the landowner of Lot 250, the City has the option to develop or sell the land. Any future costs associated with the development of the City-owned land or the City’s investment in public realm improvements will need to be reflected in the City’s future budgets to ensure the revitalisation can effectively be budgeted and allocated for in the future.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
|
Recommendation That Council: 1. Pursuant to Regulation 41(3) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, SUPPORTS Amendment No. 173 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to rezone Lot 250 (20) Burbridge Avenue, Koondoola from the ‘Civic and Cultural’ Zone to the ‘Commercial’ Zone; and recode Lot 250 (20) Burbridge Avenue, Koondoola and Lots 155 (20), 251 (38), 252 (34) and 253 (28) Koondoola Avenue, Koondoola from the ‘R20’ to the ‘R60’ residential density code; subject to the following MODIFICATION: “Amend Schedule 3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to include Lot 250 (20) Burbridge Avenue, Koondoola at Koondoola (Koondoola Plaza) as part of the Centre description.” 2. Pursuant to Regulation 44(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015, PROVIDES two copies of the advertised amendment documentation to the Western Australian Planning Commission together with a schedule of submissions and the City’s responses and recommendations; 3. ADVISES the submitters of Council’s decision; and 4. Pursuant to Regulation 52(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, APPROVES the Local Development Plan WITHOUT MODIFICATIONS, and publish a copy on the City’s website. |
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - DPS2 Zoning Comparison |
20/528398 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Draft Koondoola LDP 2020 |
20/345377 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Schedule of Submissions |
20/520267 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Amendment 173 to DPS 2 |
20/401689 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 35
3.2 East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Developer Contribution Arrangements - Annual Review of Costs (2020-2021)
File Ref: 5734V05 – 20/489036
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 21
Issue
For Council to consider the Annual Review of the Cell Costs for the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Development Contribution Plans (DCP’s), including the findings of the second Internal Transactional Review.
Background
The City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) provides the statutory basis for the administration and management of Developer Contributions, including provisions that describe the nature and extent of Cell Works that may be charged to DCP’s.
As shown in Attachment 1, the East Wanneroo Cells include the areas of Wanneroo, Ashby, Tapping, Hocking, Pearsall, Landsdale, Darch, Madeley and Wangara. Under Clause 9.11 of DPS 2, the City is required to annually review the East Wanneroo Cell costs. This includes the Estimated Lot Yield (ELY) to inform the calculation of the Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) rate in respect of Cells 1-6 and 9 (residential Cells); and the remaining area of Cells 7 and 8 to inform the calculation of a square metre rate to be applied to the remaining land area to be developed (industrial Cells only).
In 2019, Council approved the Annual Review for all Cells (except Cell 3). The Annual Review included the recommendations of the (first) Internal Transactional Review, which identified project accounting errors and applied a proper interpretation under DPS 2 to broaden the scope of Cell Works that should be charged to the DCP’s. In considering the recommendations of the first Internal Transactional Review, the proper interpretation under DPS 2 enabled the cost of the following works to also be charged to the relevant DCP:
· Second carriageway (four lanes) structures (e.g. dual carriageway structures including street lighting, intersection treatments, drainage and additional dual use paths etc., excluding the second carriageway pavement costs); and
· Environmental offset costs, where the clearing occurred as part of the Cell Works.
These corrections as approved by Council in the last Annual Review have now occurred through a ledger adjustment and are now reflected as expenditure to date in the relevant DCP. More recently, the City has identified that the scope of Cell Works applied by the first Internal Transactional Review omitted additional shared use pathways (that serve a dual purpose) and the rebuilding, repair or replacement costs. The City subsequently initiated a second Internal Transactional Review with the recommendations being included into the Annual Review of Cell Costs.
It is noted that Cell 3 was excluded from the last Annual Review pending the finalisation of Amendment 178 to DPS 2. The Amendment was initiated by Council on 7 April 2020 (PS03-04/20) to modify the Cell 3 infrastructure works by reducing the Dundebar Road acquisition and construction costs from 100% to 50%. The Amendment was considered necessary to reflect the DCP obligations associated with the future urbanisation of the land on the northern side of Dundebar Road, which will form part of a future DCP to be prepared as part of the urbanisation of East Wanneroo.
The Amendment was subsequently approved by the Minister for Planning on 13 of October 2020, which now enables Administration to include the Annual Review for Cell 3.
Detail
The provisions of DPS 2 provide Council with the discretion to either increase, decrease or maintain the current ICPL rates through the Annual Review process.
The Annual Reviews must have regard to the actual lots being produced in each cell since the last review, the remaining Cell Works (infrastructure to be funded by the DCP), any amendments to the Local Structure Plans and any other factor the Council considers relevant.
Second Internal Transactional Review
In order to facilitate the Annual Review, it is recommended that Council endorses a further refinement to the interpretation of Cell Works under DPS 2 and make the associated financial adjustments to historic expenditure, as recommended by the Second Internal Transactional Review.
This is considered necessary as the First Internal Transactional Review excluded historic municipal expenditure associated rebuilding, replacement and repair of scheme roads and limited pathways to those historically described as dual use paths. Administration has obtained further clarification that the DPS 2 provisions can include the rebuilding, replacement or upgrading of the relevant roads, which can reasonably be interpreted as a Cell Work and charged to the relevant Cell, even if the original works were initially funded by the DCP.
The Second Internal Transactional Review focuses on projects not previously identified in the previous review including the removal, replacement and rebuilding of Cell Works. To action the Review findings, Council is required to endorse the municipal recoupment of Cell Works based on the revised interpretation of Cell Works to include:
· All pathways greater than 2.1 metres wide (previously only 2.1 metre Dual Use Paths were included), including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths;
· All Cells Works, including rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement;
· Preliminary and general costs (e.g. design, traffic management) relating to the simultaneous construction, repair, removal, replacement or improvement of both the first and second carriageway pavement have been shared between the City and DCP.
Under the State Government’s ‘State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement’, grants are given to local governments on the basis that the City contribute one-third of the road project cost. The Second Internal Transactional Review has identified reimbursement for the City’s portion of the project cost (1/3) only where the works are considered Cell Works. In this regard, the DCP benefits from the state grant and only those works classified as a Cell Work have been included into the Internal Transactional Review findings (e.g. Municipal still contributes towards the second carriageway pavement).
The findings of the Second Internal Transactional Review has resulted in $2.8 million (plus interest of approximately $1 million) being recouped from the DCP into municipal. The financial adjustments have been actioned for the 2019/2020 financial period and included into the expenditure for each Cell (refer Attachment 2 and the Annual Review section for the specific adjustments to each Cell). Administration is also investigating a second phase of the Internal Transactional Review, which was not completed at the time of preparing the 2020-2021 Annual Review, and therefore, any further findings will be reported to Council as part of the next Annual Review.
In addition, approximately $1 million in future costs has been identified in the remaining Cell Works under this revised interpretation, which is primarily associated with the future construction of additional shared use paths and is reflected in the remaining expenditure estimates for each Cell.
Annual Review of East Wanneroo Cells 1 - 9
All relevant factors have been considered as part of the Annual Review, including the actual contributions received, expenditure to date, the second Internal Review findings and the remaining estimates for Cell Works. Council is required to determine whether adequate funds are likely to be obtained to complete the Cell Works and consider increasing, decreasing or retaining the current ICPL.
The following provides a recommended position on each Cell based on the findings of the Annual Review (refer Attachment 3-11).
Land Valuation
Land valuations for Cells 1, 2 and 4 - 9 were last revised through the 2019/2020 Annual Review process (excluding Cell 3). In accordance with DPS 2, if it is necessary for any reason to ascertain the value of any land within a contribution scheme area, then the City is required to appoint a valuation panel to arrive at a consensus value, advertise the proposed value and refer submissions to the Valuation Panel for comment. After having considered the submissions and comments from the Valuation Panel, the Council is required to fix the value to be applied. Accordingly, the City engaged a valuation panel and received a consensus agreement on land value for each cell (Attachment 12).
The recommended change to land values is considered to be relatively minimal across the Cells.
Cell 1 (Ashby/ Tapping)
The Cell is predominately developed with only 3% (109 lots) estimated to be remaining. The City has now completed all the construction works (audited) and the only outstanding expenditure relates to POS compensation at an estimated total value of $1.8 million (plus estimated remaining administration costs of $170k). Only two remaining landowners are affected by POS compensation, which consists of a historic POS credit of approximately $557k (credit for POS previously provided and forms part of the Cell 1 POS provision) and a POS acquisition of 6,060 m2 with an estimated acquisition value of $1.246 million. The Second Internal Transactional Review did not identify any further corrections for this cell and the majority of the remaining income for this cell is from landowners affected by POS compensation, which can be off-set against their future contributions. In this regard, Administration has recently written to these landowners seeking to expedite the remaining Cell Works to finalise the remaining costs and estimated income from these landowners.
In June 2019, Council identified an estimated excess at full development of Cell 1 to be $26,772,872 and agreed to return a portion of the Cell 1 estimated excess funds (estimated at full development) to landowners that paid a contribution prior to June 2019. Administration has now returned the majority of this payment (total $22,679,632) in the form of a pre-payment of excess funds. In line with Council’s decision, the City retained an amount of $3,092,677, pending greater certainty on remaining costs and future estimated income being received. In addition, landowners contributing after June 2019 will receive a portion of the estimated excess (at full development) of $1,000,563, which was applied as a reduction in the ICPL rate from $25,835.54 to $18,018.64.
This Annual Review now includes savings identified in the Pinjar Road duplication project, which has increased the total estimated excess funds (at full development) by $1,469,208 (above the initial estimated excess funds of $26,772,872 identified in 2019). The additional estimated excess does not form part of the pre-payment of excess funds, which would only occur if all the land in the cell develops.
The Annual Review includes updated financial transactions incurred since the last Annual Review for the period between 31 December 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 3.
It is anticipated that the City’s statutory financial statements audit for 2019/2020 by the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) will be completed by the end of 2020 or early in 2021 and any public submissions associated with the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Annual Review will be reported to Council in April 2021.
Based on the above, Administration recommends that the Cell 1 ICPL rate be retained at $18,018.64 to ensure contribution rates are set at an appropriate level to ensure adequate funds are received to complete the remaining Cell Works.
Cell 2 (Sinagra)
A portion of Cell 2 has been sterilised by a poultry farm buffer associated with the Ingham’s Poultry Farm (Ingham’s). Cell 2 is just over 50% developed and with the imminent relocation of Ingham’s, it is expected that this area will develop rapidly in the coming years. The City has been liaising with major landowners in this cell (including Stockland) to consider other mechanisms to ensure the provision of the required infrastructure in Cell 2, which has significant areas of POS yet to be acquired and income to be received.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 4.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $103,790.57, plus an interest adjustment of $23,313.93, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $127,104.50. These works primarily relates to construction works associated with traffic treatments along Dundebar Road between Wanneroo Road and Civic Drive, Wanneroo that should have been charged to the DCP.
Administration is recommending that the current ICPL rate of $26,936 be reduced $25,476 to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 3 (Wanneroo)
Cell 3 is predominately developed (91%) and all POS areas have been acquired with the exception of a small area of historic POS credit (credit for POS previously provided prior to the urbanisation of the Cell and forms part of the 10% POS provision).
The Dundebar Road widening and duplication project is the most significant remaining cost for this Cell, which is currently scheduled for 2022/23. However, the construction of this road will be dependent upon land acquisition from the northern side of Dundebar Road, which was recently zoned Urban Deferred in the Metropolitan Region Scheme.
The Minister recently approved Amendment 178, which reduced the Cell 3 obligation towards the abutting section of Dundebar Road from 100% to 50% with the additional funding to be obtained through the implementation of a new DCP associated with the East Wanneroo District Structure Plan.
Due to this, it may be necessary for the City to seek contributions from the landowners within the Deferred Urban land through conditions of subdivision if a DCP has not been prepared. Alternatively, the City could consider pre-funding the initial capital costs (currently estimated at $1.3 million) and seek reimbursement from the Urban Deferred landowners for this work in the future.
The Annual Review includes audited financial transactions (actuals) from the previous findings of the First Internal Transactional Review, which included transactions up to 30 June 2019. Further, the financial transactions that occurred between 1 July 2019 and 30 June 2020 and the revised estimated costs for the remaining Cell Works have been included, as depicted in Attachment 5.
The Second Internal Transactional Review did not identify any additional incorrectly charged works for Cell 3. However, it is noted that $756,952.79 (including interest) was recouped from this Cell in the prior-financial year period (2018/19) in line with the First Internal Transactional Review findings. This was not previously reported to Council due to the deferral of the Cell 3 Annual Review until the finalisation of Amendment 178.
Administration is recommending an increase in the ICPL rate from $14,030 to $17,457 to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 4 (Hocking/ Pearsall)
Cell 4 is predominately developed with only 4% (200 lots) land undeveloped. There is a projected excess of approximately $9.5 million at full development if all the land in the Cell develops based on the current ICPL rate. Whilst excess funds are likely at full development, the extent of these is dependent upon the final costs associated with two ongoing major land acquisitions for POS and Lenore Road. The acquisition for Lenore Road is occurring under the Land Administration Act 1997 (legal process for acquisition); and therefore, there is a significant risk that the acquisition and legal costs could escalate and reduce the extent of the Cell excess funds. In this regard, the acquisition value is frequently determined by negotiation or court proceedings and is not limited by the land valuation approved in the Annual Review process. The compensation and legal costs can be higher and the final settlement can be protracted thereby delaying the finalisation of costs.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 6.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $259,783.49, plus an interest adjustment of $23,226.25, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $283,009.74. The finding primarily relates to construction works associated with pavement line marking for Lenore Road, street lighting for Elliot Road and carriageway construction for Lenore Road.
Administration is not recommending a return of excess funds until greater certainty can be established on the final costs of remaining infrastructure and; therefore, the current ICPL rate of $23,328 should be retained to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 5 (Landsdale - West)
This cell is predominately developed (95%) with only 137 contributions remaining from the undeveloped land. There is a projected excess of approximately $6.5 million at full development if all the land in the Cell develops and the current ICPL rate is maintained.
Whilst excess funds are likely at full development, the extent of the excess is dependent upon the final costs associated with land acquisition for POS.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last annual and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 7.
It should be noted that if some landholdings do not develop or the Cell is closed, prior to full development then the extent of potential excess fund will be reduced.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified -$9,341.25, plus an interest adjustment of $35,151.03, which equates to a total municipal recoupment of $25,809.78. In this regard, whilst Cell 5 has a negative adjustment (meaning a Cell 5 recoupment from municipal), the adjustment requires a net payment to municipal due to the interest adjustments associated with specific project errors. The finding primarily relates to construction works associated with dual use pathways, traffic treatments for the intersection of Mirrabooka/ Southmead Drive, Mirrabooka Ave dual carriageway structures, design costs for Mirrabooka Ave and Hepburn Avenue dual carriageway structures.
A return of excess funds is not recommended until greater certainty can be established on the final costs of remaining infrastructure and that the current ICPL rate of $30,909 should be retained to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 6 (Madeley/Darch)
This cell is predominately developed (88%). There is a projected excess of approximately $14 million at full development if all the land in the Cell develops based on the current ICPL rate.
There have been over 4,600 contributions received in this Cell, with 535 estimated remaining contributions. The Darch landfill precinct and the Kingsway Caravan Park are the largest remaining landholdings in this Cell. On 22 September 2020, Council considered Amendment 43 to the Cell 6 Structure Plan to rezone the Landfill Precinct to Residential Precinct. As part of Councils consideration, it was noted that the site is currently classified as being ‘Contaminated – Restricted Use’ by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) and that the landowner will be required to remediate the site in accordance with conditions imposed by DWER as part of the subdivision process. Once the environmental and geotechnical requirements for this site have been resolved, greater certainty will be achieved in relation to future income and acquisition of a 4.8 hectare future POS area from the site, which has an estimated value of approximately $11 million.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 8.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $890,009.72, plus an interest adjustment of $92,128.75, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $982,138.47. The findings primarily relates to construction works associated with a Hepburn Avenue roundabout, Mirrabooka Ave dual carriageway structures, pathway for Hartman Drive (Madeley), pathway for Hartman Drive (Wangara), Hartman Drive surveying costs, traffic treatments for Hartman Drive, design costs Mirrabooka Avenue and Hepburn Avenue dual carriageway structures.
Based on the above, Administration is not recommending a return of excess funds until greater certainty can be established on the final costs and remaining income. The current ICPL rate of $24,678 should be retained to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 7 (Wangara Industrial - West)
The Cell is nearly 70% developed. A minor increase in the contribution rate is primarily associated with an increase in the estimated cost for the Gnangara Road land acquisition and construction costs. A detailed assessment of the structure plan and remaining undeveloped land has enabled a more accurate estimate on future income. It should be noted that the methodology is based on remaining developable area and relies upon the full development of the Cell. This methodology is different to the residential Cells, which make an estimate of future income based upon a conservative lot yield estimate.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 9.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $102,752.01, plus an interest adjustment of 28,047.52, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $130,799.53. The finding primarily relates to construction works associated with the Hartman Drive Sump, traffic treatments for Hartman Drive roundabout, Hartman Drive rehabilitation and Hartman Drive dual carriageway works.
Based on the above, Administration is recommending an increase in the Cell contribution rate from $9.73 to $11.37 per square metre to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 8 (Wangara Industrial – East)
The Cell is just under 80% developed. The increase in the contribution rate can be associated with the land acquisition and construction costs associated with Gnangara Road. A detailed assessment of the structure plan and remaining undeveloped land has enabled a more accurate estimate on future income. It should be noted that the methodology is based on remaining developable area and relies upon the full development of the Cell. This methodology is different to the residential Cells, which make an estimate of future income based upon a conservative lot yield estimate.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 10.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $358,050.92, plus an interest adjustment of $124,333.25, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $482,384.17. The finding primarily relates to construction works associated with the Hartman Drive sump, traffic treatments for the Hartman Drive roundabout, Hartman Drive rehabilitation and Hartman Drive dual carriageway works.
Based on the above, Administration is recommending an increase in the square metre rate from $16.93 to $18.94 to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Cell 9 (Landsdale – East)
This Cell is predominately (82%) developed, with only 384 lots estimated to be remaining. The findings of the Second Internal Transactional Review identified various errors associated with the revised scope of Cell Works resulting in approximately $1.8 million being reimbursed to the municipal accounts. Notwithstanding, an excess in funds is still projected at full development of $3.6 million (if current contribution rates are retained).
The Cell has over $25 million in remaining expenditure and there remains a risk of cost increases associated with construction costs and land acquisition. In addition, there remains future estimated income of $11 million that is yet to be received. Whilst an estimated excess is anticipated based on estimates for remaining Cell Work and full development of all the land in the Cell, there is a significant risk that any potential excess may be required to finalise the remaining infrastructure works.
The Annual Review includes updated expenditure (actuals) incurred since the last Annual Review and includes audited financial transactions between 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020; and the revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, as depicted in Attachment 11.
The Second Internal Transactional Review identified $1,140,192.66, plus an interest adjustment of $646,758.58, which equates to a total municipal adjustment of $1,786,951.24. The finding primarily relates to construction works associated with the Gnangara Road/ Alexander Drive Intersection, street lighting for Alexander Drive and Gnangara Road, acquisition of road reserve land Alexander Drive and the Alexander Drive/ Hepburn Avenue dual carriageway works.
Administration is not recommending a return of excess funds until greater certainty can be established on the final costs and that the current ICPL rate of $29,947 should be retained to reflect the findings of the Annual Review of costs and ensure that adequate funds will be received.
Amendment 185 (Omnibus Amendment to Part 9 – East Wanneroo DCP Provisions)
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 30 June 2019 (PS03-06/19), Council resolved to initiate an amendment to DPS 2 to consider a range of improvements to the East Wanneroo Cost Sharing Arrangements, including greater clarification on the methodology for return of excess funds.
The subsequent Annual Reviews highlighted a number of additional issues associated with the provisions of DPS 2 that required an amendment to improve the statutory provisions for the East Wanneroo Cells. This included the closure of a Cell prior to full development, return of excess funds, charging of interest on deferred contributions and delegation to Administration of a number of Part 9 - DCP operational requirements.
Advertising of Amendment 185 was initiated on 17 September 2020 and the public submission period closed on 17 November 2020. A report on submissions is intended to be presented to Council as soon as possible in early 2021. If Council supports the Scheme Amendment and the Minister for Planning approves it, it will enable Council to consider closing cells where considered appropriate and reasonable to do so. In this regard, any financial risk associated with remaining Cell Works and remaining income will form part of Council’s consideration to ensure an acceptable level of equity to landowners and prudent financial management of the cell.
Administration considers that prepayment of estimated excess funds should not occur until such time as all the land in the Cell has been developed or early closure of the Cell has been considered after Amendment 185 is finalised. In this regard, Amendment 185 will provide an opportunity to close the Cell and consider finalisation of the remaining excess returns to landowners at that time, and in this regard, there are criteria included in Amendment 185 that will guide how closure should occur. It is also noted that a number of outstanding actions relating to the Second Internal Transactional Review need to be completed.
Outstanding Developer Balances
The East Wanneroo Cost sharing arrangements have significant history dating back over 25 years. Financial transactions associated with land contributions are recorded within the City’s financial accounting systems as income and expenditure; and also within the DCP financial record system, which contains detailed subdivision information on contributing landowners (such as WAPC approval numbers, lot creation, contribution calculation methodology and credits for Cell Works).
Developer Balances were noted and included in the Annual Reviews in 2019 and were reported to Council and highlighted by both William Buck and the OAG as requiring further investigation.
The balances relate to over 40 landowner transactions (all prior to 2006), where a particular landowner has either a surplus or shortfall in contributions and investigation into the balances is still ongoing. It was necessary for Administration to make certain assumptions on future actions to address the balances, which have been captured in the City’s financial system and the DCP financial record system (to meet the auditing and Annual Review timeframes).
Council will need to consider the assumptions and actions made by Administration to satisfy financial auditing and Annual Review requirements. Administration will report on these actions to Council in early 2021 and if Council has a different view then further financial adjustments can be made at this time.
Consultation
DPS 2 requires the proposed land values to be advertised for a period of 28 days and the revision of Cell Costs for a period of 42 days respectively.
Due to the Christmas period, Administration will extend the statutory advertising period by 14 days to allow for landowners adequate time to respond. Advertising will be carried out by means of advertisements in newspapers, letters sent to affected landowners and on the City’s website.
Comment
It is recommended that Council notes the background, process, timing and recommendations outlined in this report, including the Annual Review of all cells as follows:
· Cell 1 - ICPL rate of $18,019 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750;
· Cell 2 - ICPL rate of $25,476 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750;
· Cell 3 - ICPL rate of $17,457 and Land Valuation of $1,887,500;
· Cell 4 - ICPL rate of $23,328 and Land Valuation of $1,937,500;
· Cell 5 - ICPL rate of $30,909 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500;
· Cell 6 - ICPL rate of $24,678 and Land Valuation of $2,087,500;
· Cell 7 - Contribution rate of $11.37 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,125,000;
· Cell 8 - Contribution rate of $18.94 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,037,500; and
· Cell 9 - ICPL rate of $29,947 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500.
It is further recommended that Council endorses the application of the provisions of DPS 2 in respect of Cell Works prescribed in Schedule 6 of DSP 2 to include the additional Cell Works as recommended by the Second Internal Transactional Review and as outlined in the Detail section of this report.
Statutory Compliance
In line with DPS 2, the completion of the Annual Review as outlined in this report will satisfy the City’s statutory obligations to complete Annual Reviews for the 2020/2021 financial year.
External auditing of the DCP accounts has been completed and the City complies with the provisions of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The Annual review of the DCP will assist in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it will ensure that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships will apply as a key element in the DCP review process to maintain effective engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 developer contribution arrangements are subject to an Annual Review process to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of infrastructure items, as per DPS 2.
To support the Annual Review (Cells 1-9), William Buck was engaged to perform audit to ensure the accuracies of the calculated ICPL rate. The audit works had been completed and the relevant audit reports were finalised and delivered to the City in October 2020.
The audit reports are set out in Attachments 13 to 21.
The audit reports have confirmed that the adjusted contribution rates associated with Cell 2, 3, 7 and 8 are fairly stated and in compliance with DPS2. In relation to Cells 1, 4, 5 and 6, the Annual review has identified and recommended that the ICPL rates be retained, pending consideration of Amendment 185. The audit reports have highlighted that the methodology of DPS2 cannot be utilised to establish an ICPL rate for charging remaining (undeveloped) landowners, where adequate funds exist to complete the estimated remaining Cell Works. In this regard, Administration recommends that the ICPL rates should be retained for these Cells to ensure an equitable (interim) solution to the setting of rates. Upon completion of the Cell Works and the development of all the land in the Cell (or closure of the Cell) the extent of excess funds can, at this time, be accurately determined and returned.
Subject to the agreement of Council to the recommendations of the Audit and the revision of costs, it may be necessary for Administration to make adjustments to the Long Term Financial Plan to reflect the revised DCP funding allocations.
Administration has reviewed the City’s position in relation to DCP’s and recommends that some infrastructure, which has previously been funded through City’s municipal accounts can now be funded by the relevant DCP account, resulting in approximately $3.8 million of municipal recoupment for the current financial year (2019/20).
In relation to Cell 3, it is advised that $756,952.79 (including interest) be recouped from this Cell in the 2018/19 financial period in line with the First Internal Transactional Review recommendations.
As reported to Council in December 2019, submissions received in relation to the previous Annual Review questioned the City’s interpretation of Cell Works. There is a possibility that if Council applies this interpretation to the building, replacement and repair as recommended by the Second Internal Transactional Review, that landowners could make further submissions, and if requested, this matter may be referred to commercial arbitration in accordance with DPS 2. If this occurs a different outcome could be reached, which would affect the total value of the recoupment to the City.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcome of the 2020/21 Annual Review of Cells 1 to 9 as depicted in Attachment 3 to 11;
2. NOTES the findings of the Second Internal Transactional Audit for Cells 1-9 as corrected for the Cells current financial year (2019/20) to action the municipal recoupment of $3,818,197.43, including interest, from the relevant East Wanneroo Developer Contributions Plan Cell accounts, as depicted in Attachment 2;
3. ENDORSES the application of the provisions of the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 in respect of Cell Works prescribed in Schedule 6 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to include the following and make the financial adjustments for a municipal recoupment of $3,818,197.43, including interest:
a) All pathways greater than 2.1 metres wide (previously only 2.1 metre Dual Use Paths were included), including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths;
b) All Cells Works, including rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement; and
c) Preliminary and general costs (e.g. design, traffic management) relating to the simultaneous construction, repair, removal, replacement or improvement of both the first and second carriageway pavement have been shared between the City and Developer Contributions Plans;
4. ADVERTISES the Infrastructure Cost Per Lot for the East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 for a period of 56 days in accordance with Clause 9.11.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, as depicted in Attachment 3-11 and depicted below:
a) Cell 1 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $18,019 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
b) Cell 2 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $25,476 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
c) Cell 3 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $17,457 and Land Valuation of $1,887,500 per hectare;
d) Cell 4 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $23,328 and Land Valuation of $1,937,500 per hectare;
e) Cell 5 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $30,909 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare;
f) Cell 6 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $24,678 and Land Valuation of $2,087,500 per hectare;
g) Cell 7 - Contribution rate of $11.37 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,125,000 per hectare;
h) Cell 8 - Contribution rate of $18.94 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,037,500 per hectare; and
i) Cell 9 - infrastructure cost per lot rate of $29,947 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare;
5. ADVERTISES the revised average englobo values per hectare for the East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 for a period of 42 days in accordance with Clause 9.14.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, as depicted in Attachment 12; and
6. NOTES that a correction to the East Wanneroo Cell 3 account was completed in the 2018/19 financial year Cell 3, which relates to a municipal recoupment recommended in the First Internal Transactional Review for the amount of $756,952.79 (including interest).
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Cells 1-9 Consolidated Location Plan |
19/162679 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Second Transactional Internal Review Identified Adjustments |
20/517309 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attcahment 3 - Cell 1 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477223 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Cell 2 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477224 |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Cell 3 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477228 |
Minuted |
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Cell 4 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477229 |
Minuted |
|
7⇩. |
Attachment 7 - Cell 5 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477231 |
Minuted |
|
8⇩. |
Attachment 8 - Cell 6 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477234 |
Minuted |
|
9⇩. |
Attachment 9 - Cell 7 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477237 |
Minuted |
|
10⇩. |
Attachment 10 - Cell 8 Summary of Income and Expenditure (2020-2021) |
20/477239 |
Minuted |
|
11⇩. |
Attachment 11 - Cell 9 Summary of Income and Expenditure - (2020-2021) |
20/477241 |
Minuted |
|
12⇩. |
Attachment 12 - Cells 1-9 Consensus Valuation (Panel Valuation) |
20/477349 |
Minuted |
|
13⇩. |
Attachment 13 - Cell 1 Audit Report |
20/477309 |
|
|
14⇩. |
Attachment 14 - Cell 2 Audit Report |
20/477315 |
|
|
15⇩. |
Attachment 15 - Cell 3 Audit Report |
20/477319 |
|
|
16⇩. |
Attachment 16 - Cell 4 Audit Report |
20/477325 |
|
|
17⇩. |
Attachment 17 - Cell 5 Audit Report |
20/477330 |
|
|
18⇩. |
Attachment 18 - Cell 6 Audit Report |
20/477334 |
|
|
19⇩. |
Attcahment 19 - Cell 7 Audit Report |
20/477338 |
|
|
20⇩. |
Attachment 20 - Cell 8 Audit Report |
20/477342 |
|
|
21⇩. |
Attachment 21 - Cell 9 Audit Report |
20/477344 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 88
File Ref: 23156V02 – 20/489055
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the revised cost estimates as part of the Annual Review for the Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan (DCP).
Background
Amendment No. 122 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 was gazetted in September 2014 and introduced the DCP provisions into District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2). At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 28 April 2015 (PD07-04/15). Council subsequently adopted the Yanchep-Two Rocks DCP and Cost Apportionment Schedule.
The DCP identifies various community facilities and provides estimates on the total cost, estimated contributions and the timing for the delivery of infrastructure within the Yanchep-Two Rocks area (up to 2030), including:
· Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club;
· Yanchep District Open Space (Splendid Park); and
· Capricorn Coastal Node Facilities.
The DCP is subject to an Annual Review requirement to ensure that the cost contribution is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of approved infrastructure items over the life of the DCP.
On the 18 June 2019, Amendment 166 to DPS 2 was gazetted, which extended the operating period of the DCP from 10 years to 16 years (2014 to 2030). In addition, the Annual Review of costs introduced the ‘ID Forecast’ projections to estimate future lot yields rather than the use of landowner estimates, which were proven over a number of years to be overly optimistic.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 28 April 2015 (PD07-04/15), Council considered the last Annual Review of Costs for the 2019/2020 Financial Year period and adopted the following:
a) “A decrease in the total infrastructure costs from $27,871,906 to $27,153,086;
b) An increase in the cost per dwelling from $3,175.25 to $3,398.77; and
c) A decrease in the DCP funding apportionment from 71.58% to 69.77%.”
In relation to the above, whilst there was a reduction in the total infrastructure costs, the DCP required an increase to the contribution cost per dwelling due to an overall reduction in the total estimated dwelling yield over the life of the DCP. It is also noted as part of the resolution the Yanchep-Two Rocks Technical Advisory Committee was disbanded due to the fact that most of the infrastructure has now been completed.
It is anticipated that the State Government will finalise the draft State Planning Policy 3.6 (SPP 3.6) in early 2021 and it is likely this policy will have implications on existing DCP’s and the preparation of future DCP’s within the City.
Detail
The Annual Review of costs requires the inclusion of audited expenditure since the last Annual Review and includes all costs to 30 June 2020, and the estimated remaining DCP costs. These costs are broken down into facility costs, administration costs, income and expenditure (including borrowing costs). The following provides a breakdown of the salient issues of the Annual Review as depicted in Attachment 1.
Facility Costs
A summary of the updated cost estimates for each facility is detailed in Figure 1 below. The costs include the actuals to date and the estimated remaining costs. The remaining estimated costs only relate to the Capricorn Coastal Node, which is scheduled for completion by 2021/2022.
|
Facility |
Status |
2019/20 Annual Review |
2020/21 Annual Review |
Difference |
|
Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club |
Complete |
$7,939,850 |
$7,938,238 |
-$1,612 |
|
Yanchep District Open Space |
|
|
|
|
|
- Land |
Complete |
$6,080,000 |
$6,530,040 |
+$450,040 |
|
- Oval groundworks |
Complete |
$2,873,996 |
$2,873,996 |
$0 |
|
- Oval landscaping |
Complete |
$5,318,646 |
$5,318,646 |
$0 |
|
- Pavilion |
Complete |
$2,781,721 |
$2,776,631 |
-$5,090 |
|
Capricorn Coastal Node Facilities |
Pending |
$2,158,873 |
$2,193,923 |
+$35,050 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$27,153,086 |
$27,631,474 |
+$478,388 |
Figure 1 – Updated Cost Estimates for Facilities
· Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club – The remaining landscaping/ rehabilitation costs had a minor saving of $1,612 to the 2019/2020 estimate of $56,000. The works were completed within the 2019/20 financial year, which brings this project to completion for a total expenditure of $7,938,238.
· Yanchep District Open Space (Splendid Park) – A minor saving of $5,090 was identified in the Oval Pavilion costs. The acquisition of the Yanchep District Open Space was finalised earlier this year. The acquisition price was considered by Council on 5 May 2020 (CS06-05/20), where a final acquisition value was approved in accordance with market valuation, the deed of agreement between the City and Yanchep Beach Joint Venture (YBJV) and the relevant land acquisition clauses of DPS2. The approved acquisition cost resulted in an increase of $450,040 to the 2019/2020 estimated cost, which increased from $6,080,000 to $6,530,040. The finalisation of the land acquisition brings this project to completion for a total expenditure of $17,499,313.
· Capricorn Coastal Node – This is the only remaining infrastructure yet to be completed and has a revised estimated cost of $2,193,923 (increase of $35,050 since last Review).
The coastal node cost estimates are currently based on a ‘template’ design for infrastructure works and includes basic infrastructure such as footpaths, roads, paved areas, drainage, lighting, fencing, gates outbuildings and covered walkways. Quantity surveyors Donald Cant Watts Corke recommended a minor increase in the estimated costs from $2,158,873 to $2,193,923.
In relation to the above, Capricorn Village Joint Venture (CVJV) has obtained development approval from the WAPC to construct the Yanchep Coastal Node Development. It is intended that the detailed design will be utilised to provide a more accurate costing for this infrastructure. Administration has held discussions with CVJV to determine the scope and extent of works in the recent development approval that can be reasonably included (with consideration for the original scope of the DCP infrastructure) and will include recommendations on funding into the next Annual Review.
The DCP has already incurred significant borrowing to fund the other infrastructure projects ($13.5 million) and further borrowing beyond current commitments is not recommended.
Future consideration for additional borrowing, the timing for the City’s contribution for the remaining work (estimated at $769,441) and crediting/offsetting of the works against CVJV’s future contribution obligations will be considered as part of the next Annual Review.
Administration Costs
In accordance with Schedule 15 of DPS the following administration costs are proposed to be charged to the DCP:
· “Costs to prepare and administer the plan during the period of operation;
· Costs to prepare and review estimates;
· Costs to prepare the cost apportionment schedule;
· Valuation costs; and
· Costs to service loans established by Council to fund early provision of facilities.”
The City has continued to utilise the original cost estimate for administering the DCP of $70,500 per annum, which is consistent with the previous year’s actual expenditure.
The Administration costs are estimated for the remaining operational period of the DCP from 1 July 2020 to 8 September 2030, which equates to a remaining estimated cost of $718,521. It should be noted that only actual Administration costs incurred have been charged to the DCP and these costs are publically disclosed as part of the City’s Annual Financial Statements.
Loans to Fund Infrastructure
On behalf of the DCP, the City has borrowed funds to the amount of $13,556,300. The loans were required to fund the infrastructure in accordance with the delivery commitments agreed between the landowners and the City and was necessary due to the lower than estimated lot yield creation. The future interest payable has been estimated to be $2,320,127 and is included into the Annual Review as a future cost to the DCP.
The borrowing costs relate to the total estimated loan servicing cost for the life of the DCP with the repayment of the principal borrowing at the end of the operational period (2030). If market conditions and lot creation levels improve and income levels increase, the City will seek to repay the loans sooner to reduce the extent of interest payable over the life of the DCP and reflect any savings through the Annual Review process.
In this regard, the City has contributed its share of the infrastructure cost at the time of construction to minimise the extent of borrowing required by the DCP. The extent of contribution by the City is calculated annually and is premised on the City’s proportion of the infrastructure cost, which is expressed as a percentage of the existing population at the time of creating the DCP to the total estimated population at the end of the operating period of the DCP (2030).
Cost Apportionment and Contribution Rates
The methodology for calculating cost contributions is set out in DPS 2 and requires the cost contributions to be calculated based on the relative need generated by new dwellings.
The City’s contribution towards the total cost of facilities is based on the number of existing dwellings (existing demand prior to the creation of the DCP) of 3,089 dwellings and expressed as a proportion of the total estimated dwellings over the operational period of the DCP. The total estimated lot yield is based on the ID Forecast projections and in effect, the lower the total estimated lot yield the higher the cost per lot and the higher the City’s proportion of the total cost. This methodology reflects the principles of State Planning Policy 3.6, which refers to a need and nexus of costs and the principle that the user pays.
Since inception of the DCP, the annual lot creation in the Yanchep Two-Rocks DCP has been consistently lower than anticipated. The 2020/2021 Annual Review has identified a reduction in the total estimated lot yield from 10,220 to 8,808, which equates to an increase in the City’s portion of the cost from 30.23% to 35.07% ($7,522,336 to $8,896,281) and a corresponding increase in the DCP contribution rate (future subdividers) from $3,398.77 to $4,047.38 per dwelling (an increase of $648.61 per lot).
Due to the COVID-19 economic stimulus incentives rolled out by the State and Federal governments this year, increased lot yield creation has occurred. An initial review of contributions received in the 2020/21 financial year up to November 2020 indicates 130 lots have already contributed, where a total estimated lot yield of 153 was identified in the ID Forecast by June 2021. It is anticipated that additional lot creation will occur in this DCP for the first time since inception and if total lot yields increase, the contribution rate and the City’s proportion may reduce as part of the next Annual Review.
Community Facility Plan Overview
In 2010, Administration started the preparation a Community Facilities Plan (CFP) for the Alkimos-Eglinton and Yanchep-Two Rocks District Structure Plan areas that comprise the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor (NCGC). The CFP identified the required level of community facility provision and the proposed location and staging of these facilities within the NCGC in response to projected population growth.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting in February 2012 (PS02-02/12), Council adopted the CFP and has since served as the guiding document for facility provision in the NCGC and informed the Developer Contribution Plans (DCP’s) for Alkimos-Eglington and Yanchep-Two Rocks.
The CFP has been reviewed and Council approved the new CFP at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 17 November 2020 (CP01-11/20). The new CFP does not identify any new district level infrastructure for Yanchep-Two Rocks up to 2030, which is the current timeframe for the existing DCP. However, the CFP does identify the need for new community infrastructure facilities after 2030. A new DCP will be prepared for the period after 2030 and the facilities required post 2030 will be included in that DCP.
Consultation
In accordance with Schedule 14 of DPS 2, the local government's review of estimated costs shall recommend that the estimated costs are to be maintained, reduced or increased.
In accordance with DPS 2, where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be increased, then the local government shall in writing invite comment for a period of not less than 28 days, prior to making any decision to increase the estimated costs. As the overall estimated costs have increased, advertising is in accordance with the above will be required.
Administration will extend this statutory advertising period by 14 days to allow adequate time for landowners to respond due to the Christmas closure period.
Comment
The majority of community infrastructure has now been completed, with the exception of the Capricorn Coastal Node works and the remaining loan servicing and administration costs.
The DCP has been annually reviewed and external auditing of the review recommendations has been completed to demonstrate compliance with the methodology of DPS 2 and the accuracy of the calculations (refer Attachment 2).
Despite the extension of the operating period of the DCP from 10-16 years by Council in 2019 and the introduction of ID Forecasts for estimated lots yields to reflect more realistic lot yield estimates, there is still ‘under-creation’ of lots within the DCP area. The recent COVID-19 economic stimulus initiatives by the State and Federal Government have recently generated a higher demand for lots within the DCP and it is anticipated that lot creation may improve and could exceed the ID forecasts for the next financial year (2021), which will be captured in next year’s Annual Review to cover the period between 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021.
The delivery of the infrastructure has necessitated significant borrowing by the DCP (approx. $13.5 million), with the higher than estimated cost of acquiring Splendid Park translating into a higher total estimated cost of infrastructure for the DCP. This combined with the lower than estimated lot yields has resulted in an increase in the City’s proportion of the facility cost by $1.374 million since the last Annual Review to $8,896,281 and an increase in the DCP contribution rate from $3,398.77 to $4,047.38 per lot/ dwelling.
It is anticipated that the State Government will finalise the draft State Planning Policy (SPP 3.6) in early 2021 and it is likely this policy will have implications on existing DCP’s and the preparation of future DCP’s within the City.
Administration will consider the implications of a new SPP 3.6 when this is finalised.
Statutory Compliance
In terms of DPS 2, the City must annually review DCP. The Annual Review process, including consultation requirements, is outlined in DPS 2. In line with this, landowners may object to the amount of a cost contribution and request a review by an independent expert. If this does not result in the cost contribution being acceptable to the landowners then landowners can request that the cost contribution be determined through a process of arbitration. A similar right exists for the process of determining the value of any land to be acquired through the DCP.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The Annual review of the DCP will assist in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it will ensure that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships will apply as a key element in the DCP review process to maintain effective engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The Annual Review of costs for the 2020/2021 period recommends an increase in the total infrastructure costs by $478,388. This is primarily due to the increase in the land acquisition costs for the District Open Space/ Splendid Park. The Annual Review also recommends that the contribution rate increase from $3,398.77 to $4,047.38 (increase of $648.61 per lot).
The apportionment methodology between the City and developing landowners is based on the ‘user pays’ principles, which results in the City’s and DCP liability changing each year based on the total estimated lot yield. The apportionment of costs is adjusted annually to reflect this cost sharing methodology. In this regard, the 2020/2021 annual review recommends a revised apportionment, where the City’s obligation will increase from 30.23% to 35.07% and the DCP obligation will reduce from 69.77% to 64.93% to reflect the total estimated lot yield, as per the following.
· Existing community/ City contribution - 35.07% of total DCP Cost (3089 lots); and
· New growth/ development contribution - 64.93% of total DCP Cost (5,719).
The cost apportionment relates to the total lot yield estimate, which has reduced from 10,220 to 8,808 and results in an increase in the City’s proportion of the facility costs from $7,522,336 to $8,896,281 (e.g. increase of $1.374 million).
The apportionment applies to the total cost of infrastructure (actual and estimated), and therefore, will continue to fluctuate until the end of the operational period (2030) and the total lot yield has been determined. In this regard, if total lot yield increases from current the Annual Review estimates the City’s portion will reduce and vice versa.
The City’s external auditors (William Buck) audited the recommendations of the Annual Review in September 2020 and a copy of their findings has been included as Attachment 2. The audit opinion concluded that the DCP costs incurred, estimates for remaining development works, and proposed rate of $4,047.38 (as per DPS 2 CPD formula) were fairly stated and in compliance to DPS 2 and SPP 3.6.
The City will continue to monitor lot yield creation, interest rates and refine the remaining cost estimates associated with the Capricorn Coastal Node to ensure adequate funds will be received to complete the works and meet the borrowing requirements of the DCP.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcome of the Annual Review of the Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan as depicted in Attachment 1;
2. ENDORSES the revised Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan cost estimates in accordance with Schedule 14 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 as outlined in Attachment 1, including:-
a) An increase in the total infrastructure costs from $27,153,086 to $27,631,474;
b) An increase in the cost per dwelling from $3,398.77 to $4,047.38; and
c) An increase in the total municipal portion of the infrastructure costs from 30.23% to 35.07%; or $7,522,336 to $8,896,281 (increase of $1.374 million);
3. Pursuant to Clause 11.6 of Schedule 14 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 NOTIFIES affected landowners of the recommendations of the Annual Review and INVITES comment in writing from those landowners for a period of 42 days; and
4. NOTES that the calculation of contribution rates and the apportionment of costs are directly associated with the operational period of the Developer Contribution Plan and that lower than estimated lots yields results in higher contribution rates being charged over fewer landowners, and increases in the City’s portion of the infrastructure costs.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Yanchep Two Rocks DCP Annual Review (2020-2021) |
20/437550 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Final Yanchep -Two Rocks Audit Report (2020-2021) |
20/437560 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 99
File Ref: 23155V02 – 20/489067
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
For Council to the revised cost estimates as part of the Annual Review for the Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan (DCP) and the Five Year Fundamental Review of the DCP report, assumptions and infrastructure prioritisation.
Background
Amendment No. 122 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) was gazetted in September 2014, and introduced the DCP provisions into DPS 2. In April 2015, Council adopted the Alkimos-Eglinton DCP Report and Cost Apportionment Schedule.
The DCP identifies various community infrastructure and provides estimates on the cost, estimated contributions and the timing for the delivery of infrastructure within Alkimos and Eglinton. The infrastructure costs include planning, design, project management, construction and land acquisition costs associated with the following infrastructure:
· Surf Life Saving Club;
· Public Open Space (x2);
· Multipurpose Hard Courts (x2);
· Community Centre (x2);
· Library (x2); and
· Indoor Recreation Centres (x2).
In accordance with DPS 2, the DCP has an operation period of 25 years and during this time period the City is required to review the various elements of the DCP at one and five year intervals as per the following:
· Annually - DCP cost estimates, DCP cost indexation, contributing land area, and cost per hectare.
· Five Yearly - Community Facility Plan (CFP) assumptions and recommendations, and full DCP review.
The DCP utilises the ‘per hectare’ model of calculating development contributions, which involves the levy of a contribution based on the total area of developable land subject to a subdivision application, rather than the number of lots or dwellings proposed to be created as a result of that subdivision.
The per hectare model uses a Net Contributing Area (NCA) rather than a gross area in recognition of the fact that the NCA best represents the area of land that will contribute to the need for community facilities by excluding most non-residential uses (refer Detail section for specific NCA exclusions).
A landowner’s liability to make a cost contribution arises in accordance with provisions of DPS 2 and will be calculated using the Council-adopted contribution rate (currently $9.91 per sqm). There is approximately $14.9 million in the DCP Account that has been collected from contributing landowners, which represents the total contributions received since the last Annual Review to 30 June 2020. The original DCP net developable area was 630.56 hectares, with the estimated remaining developable area of 587.68 hectares. The DCP has an operating period of 25 years from the date of gazettal of Amendment 122 (expiry of operating period is 2039).
This report is considering the Annual Review requirements of the DCP to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of approved infrastructure and includes a Five Year Fundamental Review of the DCP report, assumptions and infrastructure prioritisation, which has been based on the recommendations of the revised CFP approved at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 17 November 2020 (CP01-11/20), by Council.
It is anticipated that the State Government will finalise the draft State Planning Policy (SPP 3.6) in early 2021 and it is likely this policy will have implications on existing DCP’s and the preparation of future DCP’s within the City.
Administration will consider the implications of a new SPP3.6 when this is finalised.
Detail
The DCP’s Cost Apportionment Schedule (CAS) has been revised to reflect the latest cost estimates (refer Attachment 1). The following provides the outcomes of each infrastructure cost element of the Annual Review:
Net Contributing Area (NCA)
The NCA is calculated by deducting non-residential uses such as regional reserves, future roads, commercial uses, POS and schools from the gross land area of the DCP.
In addition, amendments to the various structure plans and reservations under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and DPS 2 will have an impact on the NCA, and areas within the DCP that have already contributed are required to be deducted.
Since the DCP was adopted, the NCA has reduced by approximately 43 hectares from the original DCP area of 630.56 hectares (2015), with the estimated remaining developable area now being 587.68 hectares (as at June 2020). The remaining NCA is used to apply the remaining costs of completing the required infrastructure works and acquisition of land.
Facility Costs
A summary of the updated cost estimates for each facility is detailed in Attachment 1. To date no infrastructure has been provided and further investigation and detailed planning is required to deliver the facilities in consultation with the landowners.
In accordance with DPS 2, the City must have the estimated costs independently certified by appropriate qualified persons and must provide an independent certification to an owner when requested to do so. In this regard, all cost estimates should include the best and latest information available, until the expenditure on the relevant item of infrastructure or administrative costs has occurred. The City engaged Donald Cant Watts and Corke to provide updated information on the facility costs (refer Attachment 2), which has resulted in an overall increase in the total cost of the facilities from $70,977,989 to $72,028,705.
Land Acquisition Valuation
The revised cost estimates includes land acquisition costs where relevant. The valuation estimates are required to be reviewed annually and Brian Zucal and Associates was engaged to undertake this work, which has retained the same valuation as 2019 at $101 per m2 (Attachment 3).
Administration Costs
In accordance with Schedule 15 of DPS 2, the following administration costs are charged to the DCP.
· “Costs to prepare and administer the plan during the period of operation;
· Costs to prepare and review estimates;
· Costs to prepare the cost apportionment schedule;
· Valuation costs; and
· Costs to service loans established by Council to fund early provision of facilities.”
The City has continued to utilise the original cost estimate for administering the DCP of $76,500 per annum, which is generally consistent with the previous year’s actual expenditure.
The administration costs are estimated for the remaining operational period of the DCP from 1 July 2020 to 8 September 2039, which equates to a remaining estimated cost of $1,644,778. It should be noted that only actual administration costs incurred are being charged to the DCP and these costs are publically disclosed as part of the City’s Annual Financial Statements.
Cost Contribution
The contribution cost amount is calculated by estimating the total cost of the infrastructure (including administration costs), and then subtracting any contributions received and interest generated on the scheme accounts. The remaining estimated cost is then apportioned over the remaining Net Contributing Area. Only minimal expenditure has been incurred for this DCP, which includes consultant costs for the revision of construction costs and land valuations associated with the Annual Reviews.
The Annual Review is depicted in Attachment 1 and results in an increase in the contribution amount from $9.91 to $10.13 per square metre, which is a reflection of the minor increase in costs identified in the revised facility cost estimates.
Community Facility Plan (Re-Prioritisation of Facility Provision)
In 2010, Administration started the preparation a Community Facilities Plan (CFP) for the Alkimos-Eglinton and Yanchep-Two Rocks District Structure Plan areas that comprise the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor (NCGC). The CFP identified the required level of community facility provision and the proposed location and staging of these facilities within the NCGC in response to projected population growth.
The CFP was adopted by Council in February 2012 (PS02-02/12) and has since served as the guiding document for facility provision in the NCGC and informed the DCP’s for Alkimos-Eglington and Yanchep-Two Rocks, which were approved by Council in April 2015 (PS07-04/15).
Administration commenced a review of the existing CFP in March 2019, with the intention of informing the five year review of the DCP.
Not all the facilities included in the CFP will be funded through the DCP’s. Regional facilities are excluded from the DCP.
Council approved a new CFP on 17 November 2020 (CP01-11/20) and this has formed the basis of the Five Year Fundamental Review of the DCP.
The five year review of the CFP and DCP provides an opportunity to consider the reprioritisation of community facilities in the DCP to best serve the needs of the growing community. The Annual Review and the Five Year Fundamental Review do not amend the scope of infrastructure, which is defined in DPS 2 and would otherwise require an amendment to the scheme. Notwithstanding, there will be an ongoing need to consider, review and consult with affected landowners to refine the site specific design of the facilities, cost estimates and consideration for amending DPS 2 to ensure the DCP aligns with the district level facilities defined in the revised CFP.
In terms of the 2020 CFP, the priorities have been amended to reflect the availability of land and community needs. There is no change to the scope of the infrastructure items as defined in DPS2, however, the Five Year Fundamental Review of the CFP has reprioritised the timing of the infrastructure provision, as follows and as depicted in Attachment 4:
1. Alkimos Indoor Recreation Centre (provided as a part of the Alkimos Aquatic and Recreation Centre);
2. Alkimos Regional Community Centre and Library (district library provision to be captured within proposed regional library);
3. Alkimos District Community Centre;
4. North Eglington Indoor Recreation Centre; and
5. Alkimos Surf Life Saving Club.
The timeframe for provision of the North Eglinton Indoor Recreation Centre and the Alkimos Surf Life Saving Club have been amended based on the expected land development timeframes for the availability and delivery of the land. The landowners have advised that the availability of the Surf Life Saving Club site will be dependent on the Water Corporation’s timeframe for the development of their land to the west of the wastewater treatment plant, which abuts the future Surf Life Saving Club site.
Administration has been advised that Surf Life Saving WA are working with the Alkimos Surf Life Saving Club, Lend Lease and Development WA to consider further upgrades to the existing temporary facilities to accommodate the Club until the permanent facility is able to be provided, however, this cost cannot be covered by the DCP.
Consultation
In accordance with Schedule 14 of DPS 2, the local government's review of estimated costs shall recommend that the estimated costs are to be maintained, reduced or increased.
In accordance with DPS 2, where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be increased, then the City will in writing invite comment for a period of not less than 28 days, prior to making any decision to increase the estimated costs. As the overall estimated costs have increased, advertising is in accordance with the above will be required.
Administration will extend the statutory advertising period by 14 days to allow for landowners adequate time for landowners to respond due to the Christmas closure period.
The consultation period will provide landowners with the opportunity to comment on the recommendations of the Annual Review and the Five Year Fundamental Review and associated infrastructure priorities. This is in addition to the consultation undertaken as part of the CFP review.
The draft revised cost estimates have been circulated to the Alkimos-Eglinton DCP Technical Advisory Committee (consisting of landowners and representatives from the City) and the landowners’ representative has confirmed that there is no current need for the Committee to meet and that any comments will be provided through the formal consultation process if required.
Comment
The purpose of the Annual Review is to ensure that sufficient funds continue to be collected from developing landowners to meet the cost of delivering the required infrastructure. Administration has worked with landowners’ representatives in the revision of the infrastructure prioritisation, which is affected by population growth, the availability of land, subdivision staging and project planning. The facility timing developed has informed the Annual Review and the CFP update.
It is proposed that the Annual Review will be presented to Council in December 2020 to agree to advertising and Administration will report all submissions to Council for consideration in early 2021.
There is an overall increase in the total facility costs of $1,050,716, which translates into a minor increase in the contribution rate from $9.91 to $10.13 or 0.22 cents per square metre.
The external auditing of the review recommendations has been completed to demonstrate compliance with DPS 2 and the accuracy of the calculations. The audit opinion concluded that the DCP costs incurred, estimates for remaining development works and proposed cost per hectare rate of $101,267.77 (or $10.13 per square metre) were fairly stated and in compliance to DPS 2 and SPP 3.6.
The Five Year Fundamental Review of the CFP provides the strategic framework to guide the fundamental five year review of the DCP. The Annual Review is recommending various cost estimates for the specific infrastructure defined in DPS 2 and the CFP re-prioritisation has been included into DCP revised Capital Expenditure Plan (CEP) to reflect the CFP recommendations. A fundamental review of the DCP Report (adopted by Council in April 2015) document has now been completed and incorporates the revised cost estimates and facility timing as depicted in the revised CFP (refer Attachment 5).
Statutory Compliance
In terms of DPS 2, the City must annually review the DCP. The Annual Review process, including consultation requirements, is outlined in DPS 2. In line with this, landowners may object to the amount of a cost contribution and request a review by an independent expert. If this does not result in the cost contribution being acceptable to the landowners then landowners can request that the cost contribution be determined through a process of arbitration. A similar right exists for the process of determining the value of any land to be acquired through the DCP.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The Annual Review of the DCP assists in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it ensures that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships applies as a key element in the DCP review process is maintaining effective engagement with relevant stakeholders.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The proposed revision of costs for the 2020/2021 period recommends an increase in the total costs by $1,050,716 to $72,028,705 and the associated contribution rate increasing from $9.91 to $10.13 per square metre.
External auditing of the review recommendations has been completed to demonstrate compliance with the methodology of DPS 2 and the accuracy of the calculations (refer Attachment 6).
The Annual Review is recommending various cost estimates for the specific infrastructure defined in DPS 2 and the CFP re-prioritisation has been included into DCP revised CEP to reflect the CFP recommendations. A fundamental review of the DCP Report document has now been completed and incorporates the revised cost estimates and facility timing as depicted in the revised CFP. The infrastructure facility costs and timing for delivery is subject to change in future reviews and will be used to inform the City’s Capital Works Program, Annual Budget and the Long Term Financial Plan.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcome of the Annual Review of the Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan, as depicted in Attachment 1;
2. NOTES the outcome of the 5-Year Fundamental Review of the Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan;
3. ENDORSES the revised Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan cost estimates in accordance with Schedule 14 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 as outlined in Attachment 1, including:-
a) Developer Contribution Plan facility cost estimate of $72,028,705;
b) Net contributing land area remaining – 587.68 hectares; and
c) Cost per hectare - $101,267.77 (or $10.13 per square metre).
4. ENDORSES the revised Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan Report as depicted in Attachment 5; and
5. Pursuant to Clause 11.6 of Schedule 14 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, NOTIFIES affected landowners of the recommendations of the Annual Review and INVITES comment in writing from those landowners for a period of 42 days.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Alkimos-Eglinton DCP Cost Review (2020/2021) |
20/520070 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - NCGC Community Facilities Cost Report - Alkimos - Eglinton DCP (2020 Annual Review) |
20/475619 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Valuation Report of Proposed Community Sites - Alkimos and Eglinton Annual Review (2020) |
20/475628 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 -Developer Contribution Plan Requirements for Northern Coastal Growth Corridor CFP |
20/423193 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan Report (Revised October 2020) - Fundamental Review |
20/475571 |
Minuted |
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Audit Report - Alkimos Eglinton Annual Cost Review Audit Report (2020) |
20/475645 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 130
File Ref: 5734V05 – 20/489087
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider authorising various actions associated with the management of Developer Contribution Arrangements (DCA’s) under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2).
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 30 June 2020 (PS01-06/20), Council initiated Amendment 185 to DPS 2 to advertise an amendment to the Scheme to facilitate a number of improvements to the provisions relating to the management of DCA’s by the City.
Administration has identified that there are numerous decisions required by Parts 9, 10 and Schedules 6, 7, 14 and 15 of DPS 2 that are not currently able to be delegated to Administration, pending the finalisation of the Amendment to scheme. This is due to the reference to a decision by Council in relation to actions in certain sections of DPS 2 (which cannot be delegated) rather than the local government (that can be delegated). Previously, the interpretation was broadly interpreted as ‘Council’ being the same as the ‘local government’; therefore, the daily decisions such as quotations, tax invoices and the deferral of contributions were carried out by Administration. As previously reported to Council, the inability to delegate certain aspects of Developer Contribution Plan (DCP) management was an unintended consequence embedded in the drafting of DPS 2, but it cannot be interpreted differently until such time that DPS 2 is amended to replace the term ‘Council’ with ‘local government’. This will enable delegation to be considered for those aspects of DCP management.
The consequence of this is that until the Scheme Amendment is gazetted, Council is required to make these decisions. Until this occurs, all discretionary decisions relating to DCP’s in DPS 2 that refer to ‘Council’, will need to be reported to Council for approval.
Subsequent to the finalisation of Amendment 185, Council will have the ability to determine which aspects of DCP management should be delegated to the Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
Administration is required to refer a range of DCP of decisions to Council in the form of a summary report to authorise various actions, including:
· Tax Invoice/ Quotations for Contributions required by conditions of subdivision or development approval;
· Deferral of contributions requests and lodgement of a Caveat;
· Offsetting of Cell Works credits against Infrastructure Contributions Payable (land or works); and
· Prefunding of Cell Works.
In relation to the above, the actions normally occur through the subdivision process and therefore require a timely determination. Subdividers frequently require quotations on DCP, offsetting of Cell Works Credits and payment of compensation in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2 to satisfy conditions of subdivision. If these requests are not processed in a timely manner, then this could lead to delays in the creation of new lots.
In addition, certain actions required as part of the annual review of DCP’s may require an earlier determination by Council to inform the annual review process. These decisions may be included into the DCP report to enable the timely consideration of factors affecting the annual review.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Attachment 1 includes the details of the various aspects of DCP management that require a Council determination as follows:
Tax Invoices/ Quotations
In accordance with the relevant sections of DPS 2, Council may, upon receiving a written request from an owner of land in a Cell, provide the landowners with a Tax Invoice or Quotation to enable the subdivider to pay their infrastructure Costs. The estimates are valid for a period of six months and calculated using the Infrastructure Cost per Lot (ICPL) or contribution rate approved by Council at the last annual review of costs.
The preparation of a Tax Invoice is the preferred manner to provide landowners with an estimate of their Infrastructure Costs, which provides a mechanism to inform and capture the contribution liability for both the landowner and the City.
In most cases, a landowner will request a Tax Invoice or Quotation to facilitate the contribution payment necessary to comply with the conditions of planning approval. These conditions are most commonly associated with subdivision conditions and payment is required to enable the new lots to be created.
All Cells and DCP areas have well defined methodologies in DPS 2 for calculating landowner’s contribution liabilities, thereby ensuring clarity in the calculation of individual landowner’s obligations, as reported in Attachment 1.
Statutory Compliance
The completion of the annual review ensures that contribution payments, compensation and estimated costs are compliant with Council’s statutory obligations in accordance with DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate Risk Registers. The annual review of the DCP assists in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it ensures that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. The strategic risk relating to stakeholder relationships applies as a key element in the DCP review process to maintain effective engagement with relevant stakeholders. In addition, the Corporate Risk relating to financial management would apply as awareness of financial policies and financial management at unit level will be maintained to promote accountability by business owners and an integrated approach to risk assurance.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The Tax Invoice equates to a net total amount of $74,772.94 and upon receipt of payment by the developer will increase the balances held in the relevant DCP account, as defined in Attachment 1.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES the action in relation to the management of Developer Contribution Arrangements under District Planning Scheme No. 2, as contained in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - DCP Report |
20/523982 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 136
File Ref: 3516V02 – 20/454158
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
For Council to consider the final adoption of the revised Local Planning Policy 3.1 – Local Housing Strategy Implementation (LPP 3.1), following public advertising.
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 25 August 2020 (PS05-08/20), Council resolved to advertise the revised LPP 3.1 for public comment (Attachment 1).
The policy mainly proposes the removal of Quinns Rocks as being referenced as an area suitable for increased residential density.
The review of the policy is as a result of major State Government initiated planning changes that have occurred in the last three years, resulting in a need to revisit the policy and in particular the future planning for Quinns Rocks. These include:
· The State Government’s Perth and Peel @ 3.5 Million and the associated North-West Sub-Regional Planning Framework (NWSRPF) were released in March 2018. The NWSRF defines the urban form for the North-West of the metropolitan region (e.g. the Cities of Joondalup and Wanneroo) over the next 30 years and aims to limit uncontrolled urban growth by specifying where higher density infill development should take place.
· The City’s Coastal Hazard Risk Mitigation and Adaptation Plan (CHRMAP) was identified as a requirement by State Planning Policy No. 2.6 – Coastal Planning (SPP 2.6) and was adopted by Council in August 2018.
· The State Government’s commitment to the METRONET extension of the Joondalup Line from Butler to Yanchep in 2018. The METRONET Yanchep Rail Extension was endorsed by the State Government in 2018 with joint State and Federal funding allocated for the extension. The extension includes the construction of new stations at Alkimos, Eglinton and Yanchep.
· Design WA was released by the State Government in May 2019, which provides the broad framework for the design of the built environment and applies to all levels of planning. Design WA further builds on the requirement for infill development in and around activity centres, transit corridors and around rail stations.
The extent of the impact of these planning changes on the City’s local planning framework was considered by the City’s Landform and Recoding Study 2019 (the Study) for Old Quinns Rocks, which investigated potential residential coding scenarios varying from the reduction of residential coding through to an increased residential coding for the entire area. The Study also considered how each of these scenarios would impact the character and amenity of the area.
In October 2019, the findings from the Study were presented to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) for their informal consideration. The DPLH advised that it would be unlikely to support an increase to the residential coding of Quinns Rocks as the area does not comply with the State Government’s criteria for increased densities, as it is not an identified activity centre, located along a transit corridor, nor is the area situated within or near a station precinct. The DPLH further confirmed that it would not support the increase of residential coding to land identified within the City’s CHRMAP as being at risk of sea level rise.
Detail
The revised LPP 3.1 was prepared under the Deemed Provisions of the City’s District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2) to remove reference to Quinns Rocks as a ‘housing precinct’; and further minor amendments to the policy, including updating associated density tables, maps, and renumbering subsequent sections accordingly.
Consultation
The revised policy was advertised for public comment for a period of 42 days from 27 August 2020 to 7 October 2020 by way of the following:
a) Letters to Old Quinns Rocks residents and property owners giving notice of the City’s intention to retain the R20 residential coding;
b) Updates to the City’s ‘Your Say’ page providing the community with the details of the proposed changes;
c) A drop-in information session at the Quinns Mindarie Community Centre;
d) Advertising notices in a local newspaper; and
e) Displaying notices of the proposal in Council offices and on the City’s website.
The City received 12 formal submissions during the consultation period, five of which were in support of the proposed change to LPP 3.1 (to retain the R20 density coding) and seven of which did not support the proposed changes and want the City to progress increasing residential density. The key comments raised during the advertising period include the following:
· It was requested that the City consider a recoding of R30;
· If it is the City’s intention to not recode all of Old Quinns, the City should consider selective recoding (e.g. recoding only certain areas);
· Old Quinns is close to Clarkson train station and Ocean Keys Shopping Centre which, submitters considered, justifies an increase in residential density for the area;
· Old Quinns is the only suburb in Perth that is not progressing with a medium to high density to accommodate the growing population; and
· The City should support the decision to retain the R20 residential coding of Old Quinns.
A detailed summary of the submissions and Administration’s comments are attached in a Schedule of Submissions included in Attachment 2.
Comment
Recoding to R30 and Selective Recoding
The DPLH advised the City that the State no longer supported ‘blanket recoding’ of areas and suburbs, and that a strategic approach to the recoding of residential areas is required.
The City investigated the acceptability of ‘selective recoding’; however, as with blanket recoding, it was found that there would also be insufficient strategic justification for the City to undertake ‘selective recoding’ of the area. During its discussions with the DPLH, it was confirmed that State would not support selective recoding due to the lack of sufficient strategic justification for an increase in the residential coding of the area.
Proximity to Clarkson Station and Ocean Keys Shopping Centre
It was raised that Old Quinns is located in close proximity to Clarkson Station and Ocean Keys Shopping Centre and therefore could sustain a higher residential coding.
Liveable Neighbourhoods (LN) 2009 Guidelines outlines that train stations have a walkable catchment radius of 800m and a minimum 200m to an activity centre. Old Quinns is located approximately 4.4km from Clarkson Station falling significantly outside of the 800m walkable catchment for the train station.
Clarkson is classified as a Secondary Activity Centre under State Planning Policy 4.2 – Activity Centres for Perth and Peel (SPP 4.2). Under SPP 4.2 secondary activity centres have a 400m walkable catchment area for residential density targets. This means that properties within 400m of the activity centre is considered appropriate for a higher residential density coding due to their close proximity to services and infrastructure. Old Quinns is located approximately 1.95km from the Clarkson secondary activity centre (from edge of Old Quinns to edge of Clarkson activity centre), and therefore falls significant outside of the activity centre’s 400m walkable catchment for residential density.
Old Quinns only Suburb in Perth Not Allowing Increased Density
The perception of most Perth suburbs having an increase in residential coding may be as a result of previous planning practices in which ‘blanket’ recoding of suburbs were permitted by the State. As a result of implementation issues and poor land use outcomes, the State no longer supports ‘blanket’ recoding of suburbs, without strong strategic justification.
The perception in the submission is not the case, an increase in residential density is only appropriate in locations that align with State planning policy.
Summary
The City has reviewed the submissions received during the public advertising period, with concerns and alternative options raised by submitters investigated and considered against the relevant State planning policies, including the principles for urban consolidation under the NWSRPF, the outcomes of the CHRMAP and the State’s LN guidelines.
The Old Quinns area fails to comply with the State planning policies and strategies. In this regard, the DPLH has advised the City it would be unlikely to support a request for the residential recoding of Old Quinns.
None of the submissions received for the proposed amendment to the LPP, raised issue with the City’s proposal to retain the R20 residential coding for the areas impacted by the City’s CHRMAP hazard lines.
Based on the above and Administration’s comments in Attachment 2, the City recommends that the revised LPP 3.1 be adopted by Council as proposed, without modifications.
Statutory Compliance
The revised LPP 3.1 has been prepared and progressed in accordance with Clauses 4 and 5 of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2. In accordance with Clause 4(3), Council must formally consider the submissions received; and resolve to either proceed with the policy without modification; proceed with the policy with modification; or not to proceed with the policy.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.6 Housing Choice
3.6.1 Facilitate housing diversity to reflect changing community needs”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The adoption of the amended LPP 3.1 will provide the community with clarity with regard to the residential coding of Old Quinns, and will ensure compliance with State Government requirements relating to residential density.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 4(3)(b)(i) of the Deemed Provisions of City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2, ENDORSES Local Planning Policy 3.1 Local Housing Strategy Implementation, included as Attachment 1;
2. Pursuant to Clause 4(4) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 PUBLISHES notice of the adoption of Local Planning Policy 3.1 – Local Housing Strategy Implementation in a local newspaper;
3. FORWARDS a copy of Local Planning Policy 3.1 – Local Housing Strategy Implementation, to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage for information; and
4. NOTES the submissions received as summarised in Attachment 2; ENDORSES Administration’s responses to these submissions, and ADVISES submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft revised LPP 3.1 - Local Housing Strategy Implementation |
20/175216 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Summary of Submissions |
20/454494 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 158
Approval Services
File Ref: 40149 – 20/476541
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider a proposed Local Planning Policy (LPP) for Mixed Use Zones in the City of Wanneroo.
Background
At its Ordinary Council Meeting on 4 June 2019 (PS05-06/19), Council resolved to support Amendment No. 165 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) for the purposes of modifying the objectives and land use permissibility for the Mixed Use Zone. The change to the objectives was to align to those in the model provisions in the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the modifications to the land use permissibility was to coincide with the objectives of the Zone. The amendment was considered necessary, as it had become apparent that many of the City’s Mixed Use Zones were not being developed as intended. In many cases, Mixed Uses Zones were only being developed with single houses or grouped dwellings, which does not meet the objective of the Zone for integrated developments with a mix of land uses. The amendment also originally sought to limit the size of shops to 150m2 so as not to compromise Activity Centres. Council also noted that Administration would continue a broader review of the Mixed Use Zone by undertaking the following:
· The preparation of a LPP to guide the delivery of desired built form outcomes in the Mixed Use Zone; and
· A review of the location and provisions relating to Mixed Use Zones as contained in various Structure Plans.
The Minister for Planning subsequently approved amendment No. 165 to DPS 2 and details of the amendment were published in the Gazette. In approving the amendment, the Minister excluded the proposal to limit the floor size limit of shops. The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), in advising the Council of the Ministers decision, advised that the City may wish to consider preparing a LPP that addresses the preference for shops contained to an appropriate size and scale within the Mixed Use Zone.
Administration has now drafted a Policy (refer Attachment 1) which sets out to provide guidance and direction for the consideration of development within the Mixed Use Zone in terms of built form and also proposes to introduce a floor size limit and minimum lot size provisions.
A review of the location and provisions relating to Mixed Use Zones will be undertaken as the next stage of this project.
Detail
The purpose of this proposed LPP No. 4.27 (LPP 4.27) is to provide guidance for the consideration of development and subdivision within the City’s Mixed Use Zones. The proposed Policy does not deal with land use permissibility (which is dealt with by DPS 2).
The proposed Policy has been set out to achieve the objectives of the Mixed Use Zone and improve the manner in which development proposals are processed, as well as enhance the City’s planning framework by setting appropriate controls and putting in place consistent measures. The policy also sets out to manage potential impacts from non-residential uses on residents by requiring designs to address issues such as noise, light, fumes and visual privacy.
Maximum Floor Size
In addition to modifying the objectives and land use permissibility for Mixed Use Zones, as noted above, one of the City’s original intentions, as part of Amendment No. 165 was to limit the size of shops to 150m2. The Minister excluded this from the Scheme Amendment.
Setting a floor size limit is intended to achieve a balance between not compromising the viability of businesses in Activity Centres and enabling sufficient space to ensure that a viable business can operate. The proposed 300m2 floor size limit has been considered as adequate to enable a viable business to be operated. Business viability is dependent on a range of factors including competition, location, access and proximity to other uses, which can complement each other. As noted below the 300m2 size is already used in DPS 2 and discussions with the City’s Administration have confirmed that such a floor size area is adequate to enable a viable business to operate.
Having regard to the decision of the Minister and the advice of the WAPC, the proposed policy seeks to introduce a maximum floor size limit.
It is noted that Convenience stores are a ‘D’ (Discretionary) use in the Mixed Use Zone and the definition of Convenience stores states that the floor area shall not exceed 300m2. Therefore, if the Minister had granted the amendment to limit shops to 150m 2, it would have been in conflict with the Convenience Store limit.
Given that there are similarities between a shop and convenience store, and to avoid any potential for conflicting standards it is appropriate to set the upper limit for shops at 300m2 for consistency.
For similar reasoning as that which has been applied to larger shops potentially compromising the operation of Activity Centres, there is the potential for other uses within the Mixed Use Zone having a similar impact. That is, if Mixed Use Zones attract large-scale development due to its standards being too broad that there may be a dilution of the status and role of Activity Centres. On this basis, it is proposed that the following uses should also be limited in size:
· Office;
· Pharmacy;
· Restaurant;
· Showroom; and
· Take-Away Food Outlet.
To maintain consistency, it is proposed that the maximum floor size limit per lot be 300m2, which is the same as that proposed for the shop use.
Minimum Lot Size
Another control or standard that is considered necessary is the introduction of minimum lot sizes. The intent of a minimum lot size is to protect Mixed Use Zones from being subdivided into small lots to be used for Single House development only, which may preclude other uses in the future. Once subdivided into smaller lots in separate ownership, it is unlikely that they will be able to be consolidated into the larger lots required to support mixed land uses. Administration has undertaken some research on the appropriate minimum lot size and has identified a number of examples in the City where lot sizes of approximately 300m2 have been developed with integrated mixed uses. These lots accommodate both non-residential and residential uses with space for some car parking on site. In this regard, it is recommended that a minimum lot size of 300m2 be required. Lots of 300m2 are the smallest that are considered sufficient to enable Residential Development, Non-Residential Development or Mixed Use Development to be accommodated. Therefore, even if lots are developed exclusively for residential purposes, the minimum lot size of 300m2 will not preclude their redevelopment in the future for a range of non-residential or mixed use development. It should be noted this would not affect lot sizes associated with strata titling.
Design Principles
The Policy also proposes to introduce some design principles to ensure that buildings are well designed, address the street and have a degree of adaptability to allow for changes of use and dwelling size over time to respond to changing needs. This is proposed to be achieved by requiring buildings to be designed to include major openings and entries along street frontages that can provide a level of passive surveillance from inside to adjacent streets and the public realm. Additionally, the policy seeks to minimise the use of blank walls along street frontages and incorporate a room at the front of the building that is designed to be capable of accommodating Non-Residential uses by incorporating direct access to the street, have a minimum size of 12m2 and a minimum ceiling height to 3.2m.
Consultation
Consultation of the proposed LPP will be undertaken in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure. Advertising will be undertaken by way of the following:
· Notification in the Wanneroo Times newspaper;
· Display at the Civic Centre and on the City’s website; and
· Letter to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage.
The consultation time period has been extended by seven days from 28 to 35 days to account for the end of year holiday season in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure.
Comment
The procedures for preparing, amending and revoking LPP’s are set out in the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2, which prescribe that a LPP can be prepared on any matter related to the planning and development of its Scheme area, must be based on sound town planning principles, and may address either strategic or operational considerations in relation to matters to which the policy applies.
The proposed policy has been set out to improve the manner in which development proposals in Mixed Use Zones are processed and considered and will enhance the City’s planning framework by setting appropriate controls and putting in place consistent measures.
By providing for a wider range of land uses through Amendment No. 165 to DPS 2 and the proposed policy provisions to guide the built form, which enables buildings to accommodate Residential and Non-Residential Uses through adaptable designs, the prospect of achieving the objectives of the Mixed Use Zone is enhanced. The introduction of floor size limits will enable non-residential uses to be accommodated without compromising Activity Centres and the minimum lot sizes potentially owned by a range of landowners, prevents lots being created that may not be capable of accommodating Non-Residential Uses in the future.
The preparation of the policy fulfils another element of Administration’s undertaking as part of the review of the Mixed Use Zones in the City’s planning framework.
Statutory Compliance
The draft LPP has been prepared in accordance with Division 2 – LPP’s of DPS 2, which outlines the circumstances and procedures for which a local government may prepare a LPP.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
The preparation of these draft policies will provide additional guidance and direction to assist in achieving the City’s objectives of delivering orderly and proper planning.
Policy Implications
The preparation of the draft policy is undertaken by Administration to ensure that the City achieves its strategic goals and by conforming to current statutory and legislative provisions with LPP’s.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with undertaking the preparation of the proposed LPP can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, resolves to PREPARE Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones, as contained in Attachment 1; and
2. ADVERTISES Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones, as shown in Attachment 1 for a minimum period of 35 days in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure by way of the following:-
a) An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
b) Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
c) Letter to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Local Planning Policy No. 4.27 Mixed Use Zones |
20/539801 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 164
File Ref: 40141 – 20/476673
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider a proposed Local Planning Policy (LPP) for Service Stations and Roadhouses in the City.
Background
As part of the consideration of the City’s Planning Framework, Administration identified the need for a number of Policies. One Policy relates to Service Stations and Roadhouses and a copy of the draft Policy is included as Attachment 1. Convenience Stores, as previously defined under District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2), enabled the sale of petrol and petroleum products. Some members of the community raised concerns and it was noted by Administration that the definition was potentially misleading because of its reference to the sale of petrol. In response to this, Council sought to amend DPS 2 by modifying the definition of Convenience Store so that it was limited to the sale of convenience goods and prevented the sale of petrol and related products. The Minister for Planning approved the amendment to the DPS 2 in May 2019.
The proposed Policy does not deal with permissibility of Service Stations and Roadhouses (which is dealt with by DPS 2 and are only capable of approval in the Business, Commercial, General Industrial and Service Industrial Zones); rather, the Policy focusses on the built form, appearance and potential amenity impacts. This includes ensuring they are designed to contribute to the amenity of the locality they are located in, through the positioning and appearance of the buildings and associated structures.
Detail
The purpose of the proposed LPP No. 2.9: Service Stations and Roadhouses (LPP 2.9) is to provide guidance on the development of Service Stations and Roadhouses within the City, particularly in relation to locations adjacent to and in close proximity to Residential and Sensitive Land Uses.
The development of Service Stations in the City is at times, perceived as having a detrimental impact on surrounding land uses, particularly where those uses are Residential or Sensitive Land Uses. Administration formed the view that a Policy which provides a greater level of guidance and direction for proposed Service Stations and compliments the provisions of DPS 2, was worthy of development. The intent of this Policy is to provide criteria for matters to be considered for the development of Service Stations to ensure that any impact is minimised and that they are designed to a high standard. It is intended that the Policy also apply to Roadhouses, which are a use that is predominantly for the purpose of a Service Station, but incidentally, incorporate a restaurant and/ or convenience store. The appearance and potential impact of Service Stations and Roadhouses are similar; therefore, they can be dealt with together in the same policy.
Over the preceding five years, the City has received 12 applications seeking Development Approval for Services Stations and Roadhouses (and Convenience stores where they previously enabled the sale of petrol and petroleum products), particularly in new areas of the City, but also in more established areas. These Service Stations and Roadhouses have been considered and determined by the City and Joint Development Assessment Panel (JDAP).
The land uses can be approved in the areas where they have been proposed, at the discretion of the City or JDAP. Local residents have often expressed concern about their presence and the potential impact such uses will have on the amenity of an area. Typically, residents have raised concerns about various matters including traffic generation, noise, odours, fire risk, hours of operation and general disturbance that such uses may cause.
The intent of the proposed Policy is to put in place some criteria that proponents will be required to address when preparing applications. The criteria will also be used by Administration to assess applications and can also assist residents to understand the matters that Service Stations and Roadhouses are assessed against.
The draft Policy seeks to encourage Service Stations and Roadhouses to be developed to a high standard of architectural design, to ensure that buildings and canopies contribute to and address the street in which they are located.
Consultation
Consultation of the proposed LPP will be undertaken in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure. Advertising will be undertaken by way of the following:
· Notification in the Wanneroo Times newspaper;
· Display at the Civic Centre and on the City’s website; and
· Letter to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage.
The consultation time period has been extended by seven days from 28 to 35 days to account for the end of year holiday season, in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure.
Comment
The procedures for preparing, amending and revoking LPP’s are set out in the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2, which prescribe that an LPP can be prepared on any matter related to the planning and development of its Scheme area, and must be based on sound town planning principles, and may address either strategic or operational considerations in relation to matters to which the policy applies.
The proposed Policy has been set out to improve the manner in which development proposals for Service Stations and Roadhouses are considered and will enhance the City’s planning framework by setting appropriate controls and putting in place consistent measures.
Statutory Compliance
The draft LPP has been prepared in accordance with Division 2 – LPP’s of DPS 2, which outlines the circumstances and procedures for which a local government may prepare a LPP.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
|
|
|
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
The preparation of these draft Policies will provide additional guidance and direction to assist in achieving the City’s objectives of delivering orderly and proper planning.
Policy Implications
The preparation of the draft Policy is undertaken by Administration to ensure that the City achieves its strategic goals and by conforming to current statutory and legislative provisions with LPP’s.
Financial Implications
The costs associated with undertaking the preparation of the proposed LPP can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability Operational Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, resolves to PREPARE Local Planning Policy No. 2.9: Service Stations and Roadhouses, as contained in Attachment 1; and
2. ADVERTISES Local Planning Policy No. 2.9: Service Stations and Roadhouses, as shown in Attachment 1 for a minimum period of 35 days in accordance with the City’s Planning Consultation Procedure by way of the following:-
a) An advertisement published in the Wanneroo Times newspaper at the commencement of the advertising period;
b) Display at the City of Wanneroo’s Civic Centre Building and on the City of Wanneroo’s website; and
c) Letter to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Local Planning Policy No. 2.9 Service Stations and Roadhouses |
20/539896 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 173
3.9 Consideration of Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to allow Smash Repair Station as an Additional Use to Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara
File Ref: 40636 – 20/478222
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
For Council to consider the submissions received during the public advertising of Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) and adoption of that Amendment.
|
Applicant |
Planning Solutions |
|
Owner |
A&R Development Holdings P/L ATF A&R Property Development Trust |
|
Location |
Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara |
|
Site Area |
2,960m2 |
|
MRS Zoning |
Industrial |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Service Industrial |
Background
On 1 May 2020, Planning Solutions on behalf of the landowners lodged Amendment No. 184 to DPS 2 for consideration to include the land use class ‘Smash Repair Station’ as an Additional Use on Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara (subject site). Smash Repair Station is a use that is listed as Not Permitted ‘X’ in the Service Industrial zone. Attachment 1 contains the location plan.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 25 August 2020 (PS03-08/20), Council resolved, as follows:
“That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of Planning and Development Act 2005 ADOPTS Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to allow the use class Smash Repair Station as an Additional Use at Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara and AMENDS Schedule 2 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2 as follows:
|
No |
Street/Locality |
Particulars of Land |
Additional Use and Conditions (where applicable) |
|
|
A42 |
1-42 |
87 Innovation Circuit, Wangara |
Lot 216 on Deposited Plan 35032 |
Smash Repair Station (‘D’ use) |
and to Amend the Scheme Map accordingly;
2. Pursuant to Section 35(2) of Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a Standard Amendment for the following reasons:
a) The Amendment that is consistent with the region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area, other than an amendment that is a basic amendment.
3. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 REFERS Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority; and
4. Subject to approval from Environmental Protection Authority:
a) NOTIFIES the Western Australian Planning Commission of its intent to advertise Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 pursuant to Regulation 47(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
b) ADVERTISES Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 42 days pursuant to Regulation 47(2) and 47(4) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.”
Attachment 2 contains the proposed Scheme Amendment Text and Map.
It is noted that the City granted development approval at the subject site to operate a ‘Motor Vehicle Repairs’ Centre on 4 May 2020. The building on site has an area of 1,641m2 with 36 on-site bays provided. The operators of the approved Motor Vehicle Repairs land use are seeking to expand their activities to include smash repairs. The surrounding Lots are developed and their uses generally consist of warehousing, showrooms, light manufacturing, wholesalers, lunch bars, private recreation and food manufacturing.
Detail
The subject site fronts onto Innovation Circuit and is located just to the west of Hartman Drive. The site is bound by Service Industrial zoned land to the north-west, west and south, and General Industrial zoned land to the east, on the opposite side of Hartman Drive. The proposal seeks to amend DPS 2 by:
1. Introducing ‘Smash Repair Station’ as an Additional Use on Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara and amending Schedule 2 – Section 1 (Clause 3.20) – Additional Uses, as follows:
|
No |
Street/Locality |
Particulars of Land |
Additional Use and Conditions (where applicable) |
|
|
A42 |
1-42 |
87 Innovation Circuit, Wangara |
Lot 216 on Deposited Plan 35032 |
Smash Repair Station (‘D’ use) |
2. Amend the Scheme Map accordingly.
Consultation
In accordance with the Council’s decision, the amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for comment. On 17 September 2020, the EPA advised the City that the scheme amendment did not warrant an environmental assessment. The Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC’s) consent to advertise was not required in this case.
A 42-day public advertising period was carried out between 1 October to 12 November 2020 by way of a sign on site, an advertisement in the local newspaper, a notice at the Civic Centre and the City’s website, and 24 letters to the affected and nearby landowners. The City received three submissions during the advertising period with one objecting to the proposal, one raising concerns to the amendment but not stating whether they object or support the proposal, and a response of ‘no comment’ from Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. The concerns raised in the submissions are outlined below:
· Smash Repair Stations are not permitted on industrial land located to the west of Hartman Drive;
· Increase in traffic near a roundabout resulting in safety issues;
· Inadequate parking provided on site, which will result in vehicles being parked on the verge resulting in safety issues; and
· Airborne contaminants damaging vehicles parked in adjoining properties.
A summary of the submissions and Administration’s response is included as Attachment 3.
Comment
Compatibility With the Service Industrial Zone
The subject site is located within the Service Industrial zone where Smash Repair Station is listed as a prohibited (‘X’) use as it is an intensive land use that can have off-site impacts due to noise, odour and emissions. In order to consider Smash Repair Station as an Additional Use to the site, the proposal is required to satisfy the objectives of the Service Industrial Zone, which are outlined below.
a) “Accommodate a range of light industries, showrooms and warehouses, entertainment and recreational activities, and complementary business services which by nature would not detrimentally affect the amenity of surrounding areas.”
The operator is seeking to expand their existing motor vehicle repairs facility to include replacement or repair of vehicle panels, spray painting, various forms of bodywork and other automotive repairs usually required as a result of collisions or accidents. It is stated in the application that the company specifically deals with rapid repairs on driveable vehicles and repairs on vehicles with more significant damage. All repair works will be conducted within the building. The application indicates that they do not intend to perform any full scale dismantling, vehicle wrecking or store wrecked vehicles. These activities fall into the ‘Vehicle Wrecking’ land use and are not permitted as part of a Smash Repair Station. Those activities fall within the General Industrial Zone.
The applicant also submitted a number of supporting technical reports to demonstrate that the use would not detrimentally affect the amenity of surrounding areas, which consist of warehousing, showrooms, light manufacturing, wholesalers, lunch bars, private recreation and food manufacturing. These technical reports have been reviewed by Administration and are discussed below:
Traffic
The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) states that the proposed development would generate 310 vehicle trips per day, 50 vehicle trips during the AM peak, and 62 vehicle trips in the PM peak. The overall net traffic increase resulting from this proposed land use is below 100 vehicles in the peak hour, resulting in low to moderate traffic impacts to the surrounding roads. The City’s Traffic Services has reviewed the TIS and has no objections to the proposal as the roads are capable of accommodating the traffic generated from the use and the intended vehicle movements at the access point and nearby roundabout will not interfere with the functionality of the surrounding road network.
Noise
An Environmental Noise Assessment (ENA) was provided, which included noise generated from spray painting booths and air conditioning units based on file data and measurements from an existing Gemini Facility. The report concluded that the noise levels generated from the proposed Smash Repair Station will still comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 at all times. The City’s Health Services has reviewed the ENA and confirms these findings; however, notes that a further assessment should be provided with any future development applications once the locations and spray booths are verified at the detailed design stage.
Emissions
The City will require a Site Specific Emissions Report and a Management Plan to be provided and considered at the Development Application stage. The report will need to demonstrate compliance with the Australian Standards No. 4114 Spray Painting Booths, Designated Spray Painting Areas and Paint Mixing Rooms and ensure no airborne contaminants will drift and impact any adjoining properties. In addition, the Management Plan will need to include management practices which must be adhered to by the employees to further minimise any impacts. The City will impose any relevant conditions of approval to ensure emissions and airborne contaminants associated with the use can be adequately managed to mitigate impacts to adjoining properties.
In light of the above, the supporting reports provided by the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed Smash Repair Station, is unlikely to detrimentally affect the amenity of the surrounding areas.
b) “Ensure that development within this zone creates an attractive façade to the street for the visual amenity of surrounding areas.”
The subject site has an existing premises which the Smash Repair Station (if approved) would operate within. The existing premises has an attractive façade conducive to an industrial area and includes areas for landscaping. The applicant has stated they are willing provide additional landscaping on-site at the development application stage to enhance the visual amenity to surrounding areas. In addition, the information provided as part of the amendment indicates only vehicles which have completed the repair process will be kept outside the building awaiting collection. Administration considers the proposed use will have an attractive facade appropriate to the streetscape and surrounding industrial areas.
Conclusion
Amendment No. 184 to DPS 2 was advertised for public comments and the two submissions raised concerns relating to the land use permissibility, traffic impacts, inadequate car parking on site and potential impacts of airborne contaminants. Given that the concerns raised can be addressed by way of conditions on a future development approval, compliance with the provisions of DPS 2, dealt with through the proposed Scheme Amendment, or have been addressed by the relevant technical reports; it is considered that the concerns raised through the submissions have been adequately addressed. In addition, the relevant supporting reports provided by the applicant have demonstrated that the proposed Smash Repair Station is unlikely to detrimentally affect the amenity of the surrounding areas, and the proposal satisfies the objectives of the Service Industrial Zone. Therefore, it is recommended that the amendment be supported and forwarded to the WAPC for its consideration.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 184 has been processed in accordance with the provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“2 Economy
2.1 Local Jobs
2.1.1 Develop strong economic hubs locally and near transport”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance and Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O22 Environmental Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O23 Safety of Community |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to accept this risk to support existing management systems. This proposal aligns with the Economic objective of the existing Strategic Community Plan, Council should therefore consider the following risk appetite statement: 2.2 Strategic Growth.
The City’s defined risk appetite for 2.2 Strategic Growth is articulated through the risk appetite statement as - The City encourages a diverse range of businesses including emerging industries with different industries to establish themselves or expand in Wanneroo. The City acknowledges that undertaking industry development and growth requires ongoing capital expenditure for essential infrastructure within key strategic areas (for example, in Yanchep and Neerabup). As such, the City is prepared to accept risk subject to the City exercising prudent stewardship through disclosing financial risk and mitigation strategies, strong internal controls (such as Council policies and procedures for governance as well as administration delegations) and meeting compliance requirements. Therefore, the City will accept a moderate level of financial risk for facilitating industry development and growth.
Policy Implications
This proposal has been assessed under the provisions of the City’s DPS 2.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Regulation 50(3)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 SUPPORTS the standard Amendment No. 184 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 without modification to amend Schedule 2 – Section 1 (Clause 3.20) Additional Use to allow the land use Smash Repair Station as an Additional Use at Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara and AMENDS Schedule 2 of the District Planning Scheme No. 2, as follows:
|
No |
Street/Locality |
Particulars of Land |
Additional Use and Conditions (where applicable) |
|
|
A42 |
1-42 |
87 Innovation Circuit, Wangara |
Lot 216 on Deposited Plan 35032 |
Smash Repair Station (‘D’ use) |
2. Pursuant to Regulation 53 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 PROVIDES the advertised Amendment No. 184 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission together with the schedule of submissions and the City’s response and recommendations; and
3. ADVISES the submitters of its decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit WANGARA |
20/254694 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Scheme Amendment Text and Map - Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit WANGARA |
20/254697 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Summary of Submissions - Lot 216 (87) Innovation Circuit, Wangara |
20/525018 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 184
File Ref: 5332-C3 – 20/489104
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Issue
For Council to consider the adoption of Amendment No. 3 to the Jindee Design Codes, which forms part of the Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84 (ASP 84).
|
Applicant |
Roberts Day |
|
Owner |
Westminster Estates Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
2471 Marmion Avenue, Jindalee |
|
Site Area |
124 hectares (approximate) |
|
MRS Zoning |
Urban |
|
DPS 2 Zoning |
Smart Growth Community |
|
|
T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 Transects |
Background
Roberts Day, on behalf of Westminster Estates Pty Ltd, has submitted a proposed amendment to the Jindee ASP 84 for the City’s consideration.
ASP 84 consists of three primary components including Part 1 Statutory Provisions, Schedule 1 Jindee Design Codes (JDC) and Part 2 Explanatory Report. This amendment relates specifically to the JDC, which forms part of ASP 84.
Whilst the JDC forms part of ASP 84, sub-clause 3.25.9 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) states that the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is not required to consider, approve or administer the Transect Based Code component of ASP 84, being the JDC. Therefore, an amendment to the JDC is only required to be determined by the City.
Currently, there is no delegation in place for Administration to determine amendments to the JDC and; therefore, the proposal has been referred to Council for its determination. Administration is in the process of proposing changes to the delegations to ensure that reports relating to amendments to the JDC are not required to go to Council for determination in the future where the proposed modifications are considered minor and does not:
· Materially alter the purpose and intent of the structure plan;
· Change the intended Lot/ Dwelling Yield by more than 10% or adversely impact upon the amenity of adjoining landowners and occupiers;
· Restrict the use and development of adjoining land; and
· Significantly impact on infrastructure provision or impact upon the environment.
Administration would be required to notify Council Members in writing of intention to determine the Amendment under delegation and provide Council Members at least five working days to request that the proposal be referred to Council for final determination.
A location plan of the ASP 84 area is provided as Attachment 1.
Detail
The proposed amendment incorporates a number of minor textual changes and explanatory text for the purposes of clarity and consistency in the assessment of applications relating to ASP 84 and updating the Public Open Space (POS) schedule to reflect the latest subdivision approvals. In addition to these, the following modifications are also proposed:
· Modification to the Apartment House definition to allow an additional dwelling located above garages; and
· Modifying all pedestrian access ways identified as ‘Passage 10C’ from being referred to as ‘required’ to ‘recommended’ and including the following text to ensure the provision of Passage 10Cs (Pedestrian Access Ways) are considered at the LDP stage.
“Where a variation to a Recommended Passage is proposed, supporting justification shall be submitted with the LDP to demonstrate that the connected movement network across Jindee will be maintained. Supporting justification should include an overview of the impact on block lengths, connectivity of the movement network, and surveillance of public spaces.”
The revised JDC is included as Attachment 2, with the modifications outlined in pink and blue text.
Consultation
Clause 1.2 and 1.3 of the Design Approval Process contained within the JDC states that where an amendment to the JDC is minor, it may be determined by the City without public advertising subject to meeting a certain set of criteria. The criteria and Administration Comments are summarised in the table below.
|
Clause 1.3 |
Administration Comments |
|
Is confined to the JDC and does not impact on any other provision of the Part 1 Statutory Provisions of the LSP. |
Amendment No. 3 is confined to the JDC and does not impact on any other provisions contained in Part 1 of ASP 83. |
|
Does not have the potential to adversely impact on an adjoining landholding(s). |
Amendment No. 3 primarily consists of minor textual changes for the purposes of clarity and consistency in the assessment of applications and updating the POS schedule to align with subdivision approvals. In addition, the modifications also include modifying the Apartment House building typology definition, and changing the 10C passages to be ‘recommended’ instead of ‘required’. All these amendments will not adversely impact any adjoining landholdings or affect the interests of any party that is likely to provide services within the ASP 84 area. |
|
Does not affect the interest(s) of any authority of body providing or likely to provide services within the LSP area. |
Therefore, Amendment No. 3 is considered a minor amendment and public consultation is not required.
Comment
As a number of modifications are proposed, a schedule of modifications and Administration’s comments are included in a table within Attachment 3. However, the main proposed modifications are discussed in further detail below.
Modification to Apartment House Building Typology Definition
The ‘Apartment House’ is a building type consisting of multiple dwellings that share a common entry and are located above and beside each other. The current definition is defined as follows:
“Apartment house: a building type that accommodates multiple dwellings disposed above and beside each other, sharing a common entry and other design cues of single residential house types.”
The definition is proposed to be modified to also permit a dwelling located above a garage with a separate entry, and where the garage is accessed from a laneway, the Garage Apartment Must also be accessed from the laneway. This is labelled as a ‘Garage Apartment’. The definition is proposed to be modified as follows:
“Apartment house: a building type that accommodates multiple dwellings disposed above and beside each other, sharing a common entry and other design cues of single residential house types. An Apartment House lot may also accommodate a multiple dwelling above the garage or garages including those garages provided for the other multiple dwellings on the lot. Access to this Garage Apartment is not required to share a common entry with the other multiple dwellings referred to in this definition of an Apartment House. Any garage apartment must be accessed from the lane behind the apartment house lot, if one exists.
80% of the internal area of a Garage Apartment must be located above the garage/s. The area of the stairs required to access the garage is not included in the calculation of the internal area of this Garage Apartment for the purposes of this definition. Multiple dwellings built on Apartment House lots may be strata titled under a built strata scheme. Apartment House Lots cannot be subdivided into freehold titles or survey stata lots.”
Examples of an Apartment House with a Garage Apartment is included as Attachment 4.
An objective of the Smart Growth Community Zone is to:
“c) Demonstrate development innovation through incorporation of diverse and immersive human habitats.”
The modification to the Apartment House building typology definition to introduce the concept of Garage Apartments will provide an innovative and diverse building typology. In addition, the Garage Apartment will typically be integrated with a building design which has an appearance of a two-storey dwelling, is mostly located over garages accessed from a laneway, and therefore will not detract from a primary street streetscape. As such, it is consistent with the objectives of the Smart Growth Community Zone and is supported.
It is noted that the base parking standards for Apartment Houses outlined within the JDC also applies to the Garage Apartment, which requires one car bay to be provided for a single bedroom unit and 1.5 car bays provided for a two bedroom unit. However, the applicant has advised that the Garage Apartments would likely only require one car bay. The car parking requirements are ultimately determined through the LDP. Therefore, any variations to the base parking standards within the JDC will need to be justified and demonstrated at the LDP stage to ensure sufficient parking is available on-site.
Modification to Passage 10C’s to be ‘Recommended’ Elements
The JDC regulates the provision of all thoroughfare types (including passages, paths, roads, avenues, etc.) and identifies each element to either be ‘recommended’ or ‘required’. ‘Required’ elements are non-negotiable and must be reflected in the subdivision and LDP applications, whereas ‘recommended’ elements are encouraged and adequate justification must be provided for omitting any recommended elements.
Passage 10C is a type of pedestrian passage that is intended to be a narrow walkway flanked by the side elevation of buildings providing shortcuts through street blocks to enhance accessibility within the estate. Currently, all Passage 10C’s are identified as ‘required’ elements. This amendment proposes to modify all Passage 10C’s to be ‘recommended’ rather than ‘required’. This provides the developer flexibility and avoids requiring an amendment to the JDC each time a Passage 10C is proposed to be removed. The applicant has also advised that the developer does not necessarily wish for these passages to be deleted, but for them to be further considered at the LDP stage.
The primary objective of the JDC Thoroughfare Standards states:
“The thoroughfare network shall be highly connected for cyclists and pedestrians. Cyclists will be accommodated with shared paths or within the traffic lanes rather than separately designated on-road cycle lanes.”
The street blocks within Jindee are designed to be short and highly walkable as they typically range from 70 to 150 metres in length where as a maximum length of 240 metres is permitted under the Liveable Neighbourhoods Policy. The Passage 10Cs also do not form part of any key linkages to a particular location or amenity but rather provide a shortcut between street blocks.
The removal of these passages will still need to be considered at the LDP stage on a case by case basis. As part of this, the applicant will be required to provide supporting justification demonstrating their removal would still satisfy the objectives of the JDC by ensuring connectivity and movement network within the estate is maintained, and adequate passive surveillance is provided. As such, Administration is of the view that modifying these passages to be a recommended element will not compromise the ability for ASP 84 to meet the objectives of the JDC.
Conclusion
Given the above, the proposed amendments to the text are a minor change and provide clarity and consistency to the City’s assessment for applications within ASP 84. The remaining amendments satisfy the relevant objectives under the Smart Growth Community zone and the JDC. Therefore, the proposed amendments are recommended for approval.
Statutory Compliance
This Amendment has been processed in accordance with the requirements of DPS 2 and ASP 84. Pursuant to Clause 3.25.9 of DPS 2, the WAPC is not required to consider or approve the JDC and; therefore, Council is required to determine proposed amendments to the JDC.
It is recommended that Amendment No. 3 to the JDC be supported without modifications.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.3 Enhance distinctive built form and spaces based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report
Policy Implications
Administration’s assessment of the proposed amendment has been undertaken in accordance with DPS 2 and ASP 84.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
|
Recommendation That Council:- 1. Pursuant to Clause 4.3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 RESOLVES that Amendment No. 3 to the Jindee Design Codes as outlined in Attachment 2 is SATISFACTORY without modifications; 2. ACKNOWLEDGES Amendment No. 3 to the Jindee Design Code is a minor amendment and advertising for public comment is not required; 3. APPROVES Amendment No. 3 to the Jindee Design Code and REQUESTS the applicant to update the Jindee Design Code accordingly; and 4. INSTRUCTS Administration to prepare a proposal for Council’s consideration to modify item 2.10.1 of the Delegated Authority Register to authorise the Chief Executive Officer to approve modifications to the Jindee Design Codes, along with the power to on-delegate the power to determine modifications.
|
Attachments:
|
1. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Amendment No. 3 to Jindee Agreed Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/492705 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Modified Jindee Design Codes - Amendment No. 3 to Agreed Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/535630 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Schedule of Modifications and ~ Amendment No. 3 to Jindee Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/495665 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Concept Apartment House - Amendment No. 3 to Jindee Structure Plan No. 84 |
20/517449 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 194
Assets
File Ref: 41091 – 20/529403
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
For Council to consider the extension of Australian Government’s Local Roads and Community Infrastructure (LRCI) Program.
Background
On 22 May 2020, the Australian Government announced a new $500 million LRCI Program.
Through the 2020/21 Budget, the Australian Government announced a $1 billion extension of the LRCI Program.
Detail
The LRCI program supports local authorities to deliver priority local road and community infrastructure projects across Australia, supporting jobs and the resilience of local economies to help communities bounce back from the COVID-19 Pandemic.
As part of the 2020/21 Budget adoption, Council approved a number of projects for inclusion in the “Works Schedule” for delivery in 2020/21 utilising the $1.973 million allocated to the City under the LRCI Program, which commenced on 1 July 2020. The “Works Schedule” was amended in October 2020 and the current “Works Schedule” is provided as Attachment 1.
The following information is available on the Australian Government’s Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (the Department) website:
· Local authorities will be able to access funding under the extension to the LRCI Program Extension from 1 January 2021;
· Under the LRCI Program Extension, the City will receive an additional funding allocation of $6,789,256;
· This funding will be available from 1 January 2021, with the Program being extended until the end of 2021;
· Program Guidelines and Grant Agreements are currently being drafted by the Department and will be provided in the coming weeks; and
· Local authorities are encouraged to consider projects for nomination under the Program extension.
While more details are required, Administration has considered the following and developed a list of projects that can be nominated under the LRCI Program Extension:
· Projects listed in the 20 year Capital Works Program (CWP), which is the basis for the Long Term Financial Plan;
· Projects which will provide a range benefits to the community widely across the City;
· Projects from programs other than transport programs will be given priority;
· Projects which are already designed or can be designed by March 2021;
· Projects which can be procured by June 2021;
· Projects which require minimal community feedback;
· Projects which can be constructed by a wide variety of trades and industry groups; and
· Projects which are assessed as a low risk for the project delivery.
The draft list of projects that can be nominated under the LRCI Program Extension is provided as Attachment 2.
Consultation
Internal consultation has been undertaken in identifying the projects that can be nominated under the LRCI Program Extension. Following Council’s approval of projects for inclusion in the LRCI Program Extension, community engagement will be undertaken for all approved projects in accordance with the City’s Community Engagement Policy.
Comment
The LRCI Program Extension provides the City with an opportunity to deliver a range of projects, which can provide significant benefit to the City’s community. The draft list of projects has been prepared with a view to undertake projects across a wide range of trades/ industries, which will stimulate business activity in and around the City.
As the Program Extension guidelines have not become available yet, it is proposed that Council consider providing the Chief Executive Officer authorisation to consider and approve the final list of projects for inclusion in the LRCI Program Extension in accordance with the guidelines expected to be released shortly. This will ensure that the project nominations are submitted to the Department as soon as practically possible to enable an early commencement of these projects.
It is noted that the delivery of this Program Extension will require up to two additional project management resources.
Statutory Compliance
It is likely that the City will be required to execute a funding agreement similar to the one for the initial LRCI Program. The agreement will require the City to comply with relevant statutory requirements.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.2 Provide safe spaces, centres and facilities through our infrastructure management and designs for community benefit and recreation”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S24 Strategic Asset Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Assets |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to support existing management systems. Alignment with all risk appetite statements should be considered however in particular:
3.4 Activated Places
The City places a high priority on the importance of promoting, protecting and activating local areas including the beaches, bush land and open spaces to meet community expectations. As such community engagement is an important focus as well as building capacity for communities to be involved in place activation and creating distinctive places. The City seeks to pursue initiatives that activate distinctive places and supports improvements made to local amenities that retain or complement natural landscapes within the built environment. Therefore the City will accept a low risk in relation to governance/compliance and reputation.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
As per the communication received from the Department, the City will receive $6,789,256 from 1 January 2021 to be paid in instalments subject to the City complying with the program guidelines. Subject to the receipt of guidelines and Council approval, there will be a need to amend the 2020/21 approved Budget to reflect projects scheduled for delivery in 2020/21. Similarly the 2021/22 Budget will need to include the projects scheduled for delivery in 2021/22. Ongoing adjustment to individual project allocations may also be needed to suit the outcome of procurement of these projects.
The CWP will then be updated and will in turn enable further update of the LTFP.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS $6,789,256 funding allocated by the Australian Government under its Local Roads Community Infrastructure Program Extension announced as part of its 2020/21 Budget, noting that the Program Extension Guidelines are yet to be released by the Australian Government;
2. ENDORSES in principle the list of projects included in the Proposed Works Schedule (Attachment 2) for Local Roads Community Infrastructure Program Extension; and
3. AUTHORISES, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the Chief Executive Officer to:
a) Review, substitute projects listed in the Proposed Works Schedule (Attachment 2) and approve the Works Schedule in accordance with the Program Extension Guidelines to be released by the Australian Government;
b) Approve and execute the Grant Agreement with the Program Extension administering entity Federal Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications;
c) Submit the Approved Works Schedule to the Federal Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications;
d) Determine 2020/21 and 2021/22 financial years funding allocation for projects within the Approved Works Schedule; and
e) Subject to 2(d) above, include projects in the Approved Works Schedule in the relevant financial years’ Capital Works Program.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - LRCIP Round 1 - Approved Work Schedule - 201203 |
20/541668 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - LRCIP Extension - Proposed Project Listing for Council Report - 201203 |
20/541671 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 201
File Ref: 6923V02 – 20/532553
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
For Council to consider the Metropolitan Regional Road Group (MRRG) grant offer for the rehabilitation of a 460m section of Beach Road (eastbound lanes) from Mirrabooka Avenue eastwards, and associated budget variations to the approved 2020/21 Capital Works Budget.
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 30 July 2019 (AS09-07/19), Council resolved as below:
“That Council ENDORSES the submission of the following projects to Main Roads WA (MRWA) for grant funding consideration as part of the 2020/2021 Metropolitan Regional Road Program: -
1. Road Improvement Projects:-
|
Year |
Location |
Proposed Works |
Estimated Project Cost |
Grant |
Muni |
|
2020/21 |
Hartman Drive, Darch/Madeley |
Upgrade to 4 lane dual carriageway between Hepburn Avenue and Gnangara Road |
$4.5M |
$3.0M |
$1.5M |
|
2020/21 |
Caporn Street, Franklin Road and Rousset Road, Mariginiup |
Realign intersection to give priority to movement between Caporn Street and Franklin Road |
$675,000 |
$450,000 |
$225,000 |
2. Road Rehabilitation Projects:-
|
Year |
ROAD |
LOCALITY |
SECTION |
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST |
GRANT |
MUNI |
|
2020/2021 |
Joondalup Drive |
Banksia Grove |
Joseph Banks Blvd to Viridian Dr |
$846,800 |
$564,533 |
$282,267 |
|
2020/2021 |
Beach Road (b) |
Koondoola |
Mirrabooka Av to CH460 |
$276,700 |
$184,467 |
$92,233 |
|
2020/2021 |
Beach Road (c) |
Koondoola |
CH460 to old Diorite asphalt near Honeywell Blvd |
$636,400 |
$424,267 |
$212,133 |
|
2020/2021 |
Beach Road (a) |
Girrawheen |
Hainsworth Av to Mirrabooka Av |
$343,700 |
$229,133 |
$114,567 |
|
2020/2021 |
Beach Road (d) |
Koondoola |
Old Diorite asphalt to Alexander Drive |
$387,900 |
$258,600 |
$129,300 |
The following two projects received funding under the approved 2020/21 Rehabilitation Program:
1. Joondalup Drive - Joseph Banks Blvd to Viridian Dr; and
2. Beach Road (c) - CH460 to old Diorite asphalt near Honeywell Blvd
These two projects have since been completed.
This report now considers an additional funding offer made by MRWA for the section of Beach Road, which is identified as Beach Road(b): Mirrabooka Av to CH460 eastwards (refer to the highlighted section in the location map below). The total project cost for Beach Road (b) is $276,700, which will consist of a Road Rehabilitation Program Grant component of $184,467 and Council Resources funding of $92,233.
Detail
The 460 metre section of Beach Road(b) eastbound lanes from Mirrabooka Avenue to 460m eastwards was submitted as part of City’s Road Rehabilitation Grant submission, but was not funded in the Road Rehabilitation Program approved by the State Government as it was outside the overall funding cap for the Program.
MRWA wrote to the City late in November 2020 advising that as funds have become available in the Road Rehabilitation program, this section of Beach Road(b) has been offered funding as it was a reserve project in the 2020/2021 Program. The project cost estimate and funding details are noted below:
Beach Road (b) rehabilitation project:
· Project estimated cost - $274,486 ($276,700 less $2,214 for linemarking);
· 2020/2021 Grant funding offered - $182,253 ($184,467 less $2,214 for linemarking); and
· 2020/2021 City’s own resources funding - $92,233.
MRWA Conditions of Grant Funding Offer
The additional grant funding offered is $182,253, which is $184,467 less $2,214 for line marking cost that will be undertaken directly by MRWA contractors. The offer is based on the City confirming the deliverability of the projects and the ability to meet the one third funding requirement in accordance with the State Road Funds to Local Government Agreement. All funds are also required to be fully acquitted in 2020/21.
MRWA also required a confirmation of acceptance of this funding offer to the City by 8 December 2020. In order to secure the funding offer, Administration has provided MRWA with a confirmatory response subject to Council’s consideration and endorsement.
The acceptance of this funding offer will require appropriate budget variations as noted in the Financial Implications section of this report.
The City is in a position to deliver the Beach Road(b) rehabilitation project within 2020/21 as existing contract resources will be used to undertake the works for this project.
Consultation
Community engagement will be undertaken to inform all stakeholders of the intended works, whilst providing an anticipated timeframe, type and location of works, as well as City contact details.
Comment
The project submission for Beach Road (b) was endorsed by Council at its meeting on 30 July 2019. This funding offer presents the City with the opportunity to deliver the required infrastructure using grant funding. As noted earlier, the City is able to meet the funding offer requirements in terms of their deliverability and meeting its own funding sources requirements. Therefore, it is recommended that Council accept this funding offer.
Statutory Compliance
Part 6 – Financial Management of the Act and Part 2 – General Financial Management of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 makes provision for budget variations.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability and Director Assets |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-017 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to support existing management systems. Alignment with all risk appetite statements should be considered however in particular:
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
Connectedness is key to building strong communities and the City acknowledges that development and improvement of local transport infrastructure and improved accessibility initiatives requires appropriate planning, due diligence, consultation, funding and focusing on communication and consultation to achieve desired outcomes. Therefore, the City will accept moderate reputational risk when undertaking improvements to enhance accessibility for the community.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
This project requires $92,233 funding from the City’s own resources. It is proposed to reallocate this amount of municipal funding from this year’s PR-1087 Recurring Program, Renew Transport Infrastructure Assets to facilitate the delivery of Beach Road(b) road rehabilitation project.
The program of works for PR-1087 will be reviewed and adjusted to suit the available budget.
A budget variation is also required to receive the grant offer of $182,253 in 2020/2021 for this project.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the road rehabilitation grant funding offer of $182,253 from the Metropolitan Regional Road Group for Beach Road(b) rehabilitation project (eastbound lanes section from Mirrabooka Avenue to 460m eastwards); and
2. APPROVES, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following budget amendment, pursuant to section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 to fully undertake the works for Beach Road(b) road rehabilitation:
|
Project No |
From |
To |
Description |
|
NA |
$182,253 |
|
Metropolitan Regional Road Program – Road Rehabilitation Program |
|
PR-1087 |
$92,233 |
|
Recurring Program, Renew Transport Infrastructure Assets |
|
TBA |
|
$274,486 |
Beach Road(b) Road Rehabilitation – Mirrabooka Avenue to 460m eastwards. |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 204
Community & Place
3.13 Appointment of Artist for Insurance Funded Replacement of Gumblossom Community Centre Public Art
File Ref: 1436V02 – 20/406367
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider the appointment of artist, Tony Pankiw, for the Gumblossom Community Centre Public Artwork commission that is funded from income received from an insurance claim.
Background
The Public Art Collection (the Collection) consists of 165 objects and is valued at $6.2 million. The Collection has some notable and aesthetically pleasing artworks, strongly valued by the community and creating a sense of place.
‘Ecstasy’ was a cast bronze based on the human figure, created by the late artist Bill Jeffrey, and was stolen from the forecourt of the Gumblossom Community Centre in January 2019. Bill was a well-known identity around Wanneroo, who was involved in the Wanneroo Business Association, was a Councillor and ran many successful agricultural ventures in the area. ‘Ecstasy’ was a beautifully crafted bronze, adorning the forecourt of the Gumblossom Community Centre in Quinns Rocks, appreciated by the community.
Detail
The Jeffrey family were advised of the theft and invited to provide a similar artwork to be purchased as a replacement for ‘Ecstasy’; however, there was not a suitable piece available. An insurance claim was lodged with the City’s insurers, with funds provided for the loss of the artwork.
In December 2019, an Artist’s Brief was distributed, with five artists registering interest. The Public Art Panel convened on 16 March 2020 with three applicants shortlisted and given feedback on their concept designs. The shortlisted artists were given until 20 April 2020 to complete further concept development, inclusive of a Marquette.
With the onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic, follow up artist interviews were postponed until July 2020. Each applicant was assessed against criteria and their response to the scope of the required services. The Tony Pankiw concept was deemed a stand-out for the environment at Gumblossom Community Centre. The concept pays homage to the previous Bill Jeffrey work; as well as references to the type of activities undertaken by the residents of Quinns Rocks.
It is original, iconic and an aesthetically pleasing design, enhancing the site and integrating with existing structures like awnings, plinth and the wall of the Sports Hall. Lighting was considered, adding an extra dimension to the design. It is a robust structure, inclusive of anti-graffiti coatings and in a form to discourage climbing. The Marquette for the piece has been made available for viewing to Council Members.
Consultation
The Public Art Selection Panel, as per the Management Procedure for Community and Public Art, interviewed the three shortlisted artists and selected Tony Pankiw’s public art concept for the project. Part of the artist’s concept includes the involvement of the Gumblossom Community Centre user groups in the cut-out design for the lighting wall. On 28 July 2020, members of the Arts Advisory Committee voted unanimously in support of the concept design, seeking Council approval to commission Tony Pankiw for the Gumblossom Community Centre Public Artwork.
Comment
The commissioning of Tony Pankiw’s public artwork will create a sense of place and continuity for the surrounding community and user groups of the Gumblossom Community Centre.
It is an iconic public artwork, not duplicating any artwork already in the Public Art Collection. The concept has been endorsed by the City’s Arts Advisory Committee and is recommended for Council approval.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.4 Connected Communities
1.4.3 Build strong communities through the strength of cultural and heritage diversity”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Following the associated concept development costs, there is a budget of $71,000 available from insurance funds for the public artwork at Gumblossom Community Centre. The budget will cover the artist’s fees for the artwork design, construction and installation and for meetings during the fabrication period.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the appointment of artist Tony Pankiw for the Gumblossom Community Centre Public Artwork commission, noting this will be funded from the insurance funds received by the City.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Tony Pankiw Concept Dev. Gumblossom 6 July 2020 |
20/283727 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 230
File Ref: 1436V02 – 20/328757
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
For Council to consider disbanding the Arts Advisory Committee (AAC) and establish the Arts Advisory Group (the Group), and the proposed Terms of Reference for the Group.
Background
The AAC was initially approved by Council as an ‘established’ Committee under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) by absolute majority.
Whilst the AAC has been an established Committee since its inception, the functional operation of the Committee has been in an Advisory capacity, with no delegated power or duty to discharge. As such, this report recommends to Council that the established AAC disband and endorse the creation of the ‘Arts Advisory Group’, noting that the Group is not a formal Committee constituted, pursuant to the Act.
Should Council approve the change from Committee to Advisory Group, the Terms of Reference will be amended to reflect the procedural and legislative changes required. Other minor amendments to the Terms of Reference are proposed and detailed further in this report.
Detail
As the AAC has operated in an Advisory capacity only, it is prudent for Council to consider the functions of the AAC and whether these best align to the purpose of an established Committee, Advisory or Working Group.
Section 5.8 of the Act provides for the establishment of a Committee under the Act and defines the purpose of a Committee being “to assist the Council and to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the local government that can be delegated to Committees”. The Act prescribes the membership requirements, operations and powers that apply to an established Committee.
Some of these prescribed requirements for Committees are as follows:
1. All membership to Committees (including deputies or a proxy member) must be appointed by absolute majority decision of Council;
2. The election of the Presiding Member/ Deputy Presiding Member must be conducted in accordance with the legislative process, including that all Members of the Committee are able to nominate as a candidate for the election;
3. Any reduction in quorum to hold a meeting must first be endorsed by an absolute majority decision of Council, before the Committee meeting is held;
4. Any Committee with a delegated power or duty is to be open to the public to attend; and
5. All documentation relating to Committees may be made available for inspection by members of the public.
The City applies the principles of good governance and transparency to Advisory and Working Groups; however, there is a level of flexibility in the process for these Groups that is not permissible for established Committees. This flexible approach can result in efficiency for the operations of these Groups such as:
1. Membership may be appointed by Council or by other means (such as Chief Executive Officer or Director);
2. The position of Presiding Member/ Deputy Presiding Member may be classified as a Council Member;
3. A meeting may be held without a quorum;
4. Meetings may not be open to the public and documentation may not be published.
Any such, matters detailed above in relation to Advisory/ Working Groups are subject to the provisions endorsed within the Group’s Terms of Reference. All Terms of Reference are referred to Council for endorsement regardless of whether they are for established Committees, Advisory or Working Groups.
It should be noted that if Council disbands the Committee, then no authority or power can be delegated to a Group. An absolute majority decision of Council is required to disband an established Committee.
Should Council agree to the establishment of the Group, Administration is recommending that the revised Group’s Terms of Reference as shown in Attachment 1 are adopted. For reference, the current approved Terms of Reference for the Committee are shown in Attachment 2 and all amendments are reflected in the marked-up version shown in Attachment 3.
The following table provides a summary on the proposed amendments and the reasons for these amendments:
|
Clause |
Amendment |
Reason |
|
|
Changed the terminology from Committee to Advisory Group. |
The Advisory Group will no longer be an established Committee. |
|
|
Changed the terminology from Council Members to Council Members. |
Align with legislated terminology. |
|
1 |
1.1 Develop policies in relation to the arts changed to “To advise Council on policy matters pertaining to the arts in the City of Wanneroo.” |
As per Advisory Group template.
|
|
|
1.2 An addition function of the Arts Advisory Group has been added “c) The review of public art proposals from developers and other entities:” Item d) has been updated from “The review of the Community Art Exhibition annually.” to “The review of the exhibition program as required.” |
To broaden the scope of the Advisory Group. |
|
2 |
All Committee references mentioned in the Terms of Reference have been revised to read Advisory Group. |
As per Advisory Group template. |
|
|
2.1 Delete the Arts Development Officer as a member. |
To better, reflect the role of this position. |
|
|
2.1 Delete CEO as member. |
The CEO will not be a member as the CEO has an authorisation in regards to the purchase of art as recommended by the Advisory Group and can attend any meeting of any group within the City without being a member. |
|
|
2.1 Addition of “c) The Director of Assets (or nominee) as a non-voting member.” |
To provide advice on public art. |
|
|
2.3 A period of two years changed to a period of up to two years. |
As per Advisory Group template. |
|
|
2.4 Addition of “Aim, where possible, to diversify arts professional skills and experience.” |
To broaden the Advisory Group’s knowledge of public art. |
|
|
2.5 Changed from Council to Director. |
As per Advisory Group template. |
|
3 |
3.1 The members of an Advisory Committee are to elect a Presiding Member (from the Council Members) … |
Added from “the Council Members” to align with other Advisory Groups. |
|
|
3.2 a) Meetings … it is to meet at least three times per year… |
Changed to four times per year to reflect manageability for members. |
|
|
3.2 d) has changed to c) and the “no later than five business days after each meeting provide the members (plus all the Council Members) with the copy of such minutes” has been changed to “made available to all Advisory Group members as soon as practicable after the meeting.” |
Updated administrative procedures. |
|
|
3.2 b), e), f) Deleted. |
Updated administrative procedures. |
|
|
3.4 Administration Change in numbering and added 3.4.1 Administration Support.
Added 3.4.2 Motions on Notice An Advisory Group member may raise at a meeting any business that the member considers appropriate and which is relevant to the purpose of the Group, in the form of a Motion, of which seven days’ notice has been given in writing to the Group Administrator, prior to their compilation of the Agenda for that meeting.
An Administration Comment is to be added at the end of Motions on Notice and signed off by the appropriate Director. |
As per Advisory Group template.
Addition of administration notes. |
|
4 |
Deleted |
As the Advisory Group will no longer be an established Committee. |
|
5 becomes 4 |
Added 4.2 The Advisory Committee has no delegated authority to commit Council to the expenditure of monies. |
As per Advisory Group template.
|
Consultation
At the AAC meeting held on 20 October 2020, the following recommendation was carried unanimously:
“That the Arts Advisory Committee recommends to Council that:
1. The Arts Advisory Committee on the advice of Administration be disbanded as an established Committee under the Local Government Act 1995;
2. The creation of the Arts Advisory Group be ENDORSED; and
3. The Terms of Reference (as per attachment 1) be APPROVED.”
Comment
The AAC confirmed support at its recent meeting to disband and endorsed the establishment of the Group with the revised Terms of Reference.
The review of public art proposals from developers and other entities and the addition of the Director of Assets (or nominee) as a non-voting member have been included in revised Terms of Reference to contribute to further due diligence on public art proposal approvals.
Statutory Compliance
Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 states:
“Establishment of committees
A local government may establish* committees of 3 or more persons to assist the council and to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the local government that can be delegated to committees.”
* Absolute majority required.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.4 Connected Communities
1.4.3 Build strong communities through the strength of cultural and heritage diversity”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Recommendation
That Council:
1. BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, DISBANDS the Arts Advisory Committee as an established Committee under the Local Government Act 1995;
2. APPROVES the establishment of the Arts Advisory Group; and
3. ENDORSES the Terms of Reference for the Arts Advisory Group (as per Attachment 1)..
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Revised without Mark Up Arts Advisory Group ToR 5 Oct 2020 |
20/436687 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Cultural Services - Arts Advisory Committee - ToR 10 Oct 2020 |
20/436689 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Revised with Mark Up Arts Advisory Group ToR 6.10.2020 |
20/438200 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 247
Place Activation
File Ref: 39443V02 – 20/461565
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider adoption of the Wanneroo Local Area Plan (LAP).
Background
The City’s Strategic Community Plan 2017/2018 to 2026/2027 places a strong emphasis on improving the distinctiveness of the City’s neighbourhoods, strengthening local character and improving the City’s understanding and awareness of local characteristics, priorities and needs.
Council endorsed the Place Framework in March 2018 to guide the City’s response to these strategic priorities. A key component of the Place Framework is the development of LAP’s for key communities of interest to identify priorities for that area and ensure that service delivery (by the City and others) responds to those priorities.
Council previously adopted LAPs for Yanchep/ Two Rocks and Girrawheen/ Koondoola in September 2019 (CP05-09/19). The City’s Corporate Business Plan identifies Wanneroo as the third area to have a LAP developed.
Development of the Wanneroo LAP has focused on the area in and around the Wanneroo Town Centre, and has been conducted over the following timeframe:
1. Research, Area Profiling and Planning (December 2019 to January 2020);
2. Community Engagement (February to March 2020); and
3. Analysis, LAP Preparation and Approval (April to November 2020).
The final draft Wanneroo LAP has now been completed and is included at Attachment 1 for consideration.
Detail
Key elements of the Wanneroo LAP are detailed below:
Community Priorities
Nine community priorities for the local area have been identified through community engagement. Commentary on each priority is provided below:
1. Sustainability, Parks and Trees
The area around Lake Joondalup is highly valued in relation to active and passive recreation, playgrounds, cycling and walks trails, and also for the opportunity it provides to appreciate the natural environment.
The abundance of local parks, particularly Rotary Park, is important, with a desire to see more nature play spaces and upgraded amenities such as water fountains, fitness equipment, picnic tables and playgrounds that increase the length of time able to be spent enjoying these spaces.
Sustainability is also a focus, with a desire to see continued and improved conservation of natural bush areas and wildlife, protection of existing tree scapes and the implementation of future tree planting programs.
It was suggested that information on Aboriginal sustainability methods, heritage interpretation and trails be considered for the natural landscape and parks.
2. Facilities and Attractions
People appreciate the wide range of facilities available in the area, in particular Aquamotion, Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre (incorporating regional Library and Museum facilities, and a gallery space), Wanneroo Youth Centre and Skatepark, Wanneroo Showgrounds and Rotary Park.
The high quality of exhibitions at the Gallery and Museum are appreciated by respondents. There is a general desire to support, maintain and improve facilities in the area through amenity upgrades, revitalisation of the Wanneroo Youth Centre and improved parking amenity.
The importance of the Library to the community is clear, with the facility, activities and friendly staff all highly valued. People regularly cited it as their favourite place and what they like best about the area.
3. Community and Cultural Connections
People enjoy living in the area and value the great sense of community. There is a strong link between the many community, recreation and cultural facilities in the area and activities undertaken with friends and family.
The Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre is a drawcard for activities that can incorporate visits to local cafes and restaurants and enjoyment of the local food culture. There is support for places to be available for connection at all times of day, across a wide range of City facilities, along with interpretation of local history and stories, including Aboriginal culture. Hanging out at the Wanneroo Youth Centre and skate park is popular, as is engaging with others in natural areas and parks.
4. Transport and Connections
The local area is valued for its easy walking distance to most shops and facilities, its many shared cycling and pedestrian paths and free parking in the Town Centre. However, improved path connections are required to connect key sites and problems have been noted around congestion at the drop off/ pick up at school sites, particularly in the Town Centre and perceived lack of available parking at peak times.
Suggestions include improved public transport connections between Wanneroo Town Centre and train stations, a bus service in Sinagra, a shuttle bus around the local area and better pedestrian access, accessibility and wayfinding within the Town Centre and the local area more generally. Pedestrian safety when crossing Wanneroo Road into the Town Centre is an issue, as is pedestrian/vehicle right of way across the Dundebar Road roundabout.
5. Shops and Small Business
There is a strong desire for localised business and employment opportunities to be supported by the City, residents and visitors. Convenience of access and the range of shops and businesses in the area is appreciated, with many recognised as popular meeting places. Although Wanneroo Central is both praised and criticised as a shopping venue, the presence of a large shopping centre with a department store as an anchor tenant is valued. There is a desire for a greater number and range of food choices to enliven the Town Centre.
6. Events and Activities
The City’s range of existing outdoor and in-facility events such as school holiday programs at the Library and Museum are greatly appreciated, with suggestions for more movies, family friendly and small events to be held in the Town Centre.
There is also a desire for greater use of the Wanneroo Showgrounds for events in addition to the popular Wanneroo Show, and for the Wanneroo Youth Centre and skate park to be used for youth focused activities such as skate competitions. The Limelight Theatre is recognised for providing performing arts opportunities.
Provision of more local events with Aboriginal content, and including adult and evening events were supported, with a desire to see improved and more targeted promotion and advertising for local events and activities.
7. Feel and Ambience of Area
The local area is characterised by its rural aspect, village, small country town feel and appreciated for its laid back lifestyle and proximity to natural bush and green spaces.
Concerns are centred on town planning considerations and the impact of future development, particularly the introduction of higher density lots and perceived loss of existing character.
8. Town Centre
The presentation of the Town Centre is seen by respondents as lacking and in need of attention to improve the social amenity and local economy. Suggestions for revitalisation include pedestrian friendly and activated spaces for informal gatherings and small events, improving streetscapes and the introduction of more outdoor café spaces to create a relaxed and engaging atmosphere. The redevelopment of the existing carpark on the corner of Rocca Way and Yagan Place was suggested to create a piazza style public space.
The Town Centre is seen as being disjointed and difficult to travel through, with some of the older areas in need of redevelopment or improvement – in particular the poor condition of the carpark area at Rocca Way. Better delineation of parking, roadways and pedestrian access is required, as are improvements to the pedestrian access and connection from Bert Togno Park to Yagan Place. The positioning of the Wanneroo Library and Cultural Centre as a civic heart that acts as a hub for welcoming and attracting diverse communities is supported.
9. Safety and Image
Pedestrian safety and security are a priority, with crime levels a lesser concern. Improved landscaping, pedestrian amenity and lighting across the local area are seen as good ways to promote safety and encourage social interaction, walking and cycling, along with attention to the general upkeep of roads, verges and streetscapes within the Town Centre. This reflects current studies that link the creation of safer spaces through urban design and place activation to create a genuine feeling of safety for residents and visitors.
Services, Programs and Facilities
Survey participants were asked to identify their current and potential use of services, programs and facilities in their local area. Key findings included:
· ‘Libraries’, ‘Parks and Conservation’, ‘Waste Services’ and ‘Museum’ were rated highly as services used by respondents;
· ‘Sport’, ‘Youth’ and ‘Libraries’ were reported as the most utilised programs;
· There was no clear preference for the type of Activities and Events that people like to attend, with ‘markets’, ‘large community events’, ‘festivals’, ‘library’, ‘live music’, Wanneroo Show’, and ‘Wanneroo Festival’ all popular responses, followed closely by ‘outdoor movies’, ‘small local community event’, and ‘museum’; and
· Civic Centre, Aquamotion, Youth Centre (and associated skate park), along with the Library, Gallery and Museum all rated highly across the survey.
Draft Local Area Vision
A vision for each LAP is a key element of the place development process, outlining a shared goal and articulating desired lifestyle outcomes. The intent of the vision is to ensure that the City and community remain focused on what is important and that future programs, services and development activity can be aligned to ensure that they contribute to achieving the vision.
A draft Vision was created from analysis of the comments received from the community engagement, and was subsequently workshopped with the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group and Community Workshop participants for comment and affirmation. The feedback received resulted in minor changes to the draft Vision as detailed in the below table:
|
Preliminary Draft Vision |
Final Draft Vision |
|
A friendly community with a small country town feel that appreciates the beauty and sustainability of the natural environment and the abundance of local parks. Easy walking distance to shops and facilities and many shared cycling and pedestrian paths enables people to connect at all times of day. Interpretation of local history, including Aboriginal culture, tells the rich and diverse stories of this place. The Town Centre provides pedestrian friendly spaces to catch up with friends and family.
|
A friendly community with a small country town feel that includes a mix of lifestyle choices. People appreciate the beauty and sustainability of the natural environment, Lake Joondalup foreshore and the abundance of local parks and leisure facilities. The many shared cycling and pedestrian paths to shops and excellent cultural facilities enable connection during the day and the evening. Interpretation of local history, including Aboriginal culture, tells the rich and diverse stories of this place. The town centre provides friendly spaces to catch up with friends and family. |
Action Plan
As with the previous LAPs, an Action Plan has been developed by:
· Conducting a scan of the City’s strategic documents such as Corporate Business Plan, Capital Works Plan and Service Unit Plans to determine current and planned projects and initiatives for the Wanneroo Local Area and matching them to community priorities;
· From this understanding of the scale and scope of planned projects, identifying any gaps or issues that are not being adequately addressed; and
· Developing responses that will provide a well-rounded program for management and development in the local area.
Works contained in the Action Plan are scheduled over a four-year period, although actual timeframe for delivery will be subject to Council’s annual budget deliberations. This is stated in the Wanneroo LAP to provide clarity on the indicative status of the future actions and provide for any amendments and changes to the program that may result from budget development processes.
Consultation
Community Engagement
The approach and intent of the community engagement process was to uncover what makes the area special, unique and distinctive, whilst developing a clear understanding of the services, facilities and programs that will meet the needs of residents and stakeholders, now and into the future.
The community engagement period ran from 26 January – 31 March 2020. As part of the comprehensive engagement program, a Community Workshop was held on 12 March 2020 to outline the intent and steps of the project, and initial key findings. The workshop attracted approximately 20 participants and elicited valuable and insightful input. Participants engaged in a range of activities including:
· Brainstorming priorities and ideas for local improvements under key themes;
· A mapping exercise to identify location-based comments and ideas; and
· A visioning table to gather keywords and phrases that represented participants’ vision for the local area.
A second Community Workshop was initially deferred due to COVID-19 restrictions and subsequently held on 23 September 2020 to test key elements and outcomes of the Plan. This was also attended by approximately 25 participants with activities including:
· Review and input to the local area vision. Participants supported the vision but minor changes were made in response to their feedback;
· Discussion of the Community Priorities. Workshop participants supported the community priorities that were drawn from engagement comments; and
· Facilitated discussion of potential responses to Community Priorities.
Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group
The Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Group had input into the development of the Wanneroo LAP at key milestones in its preparation including consideration of:
· Preliminary research and definition of the local area boundary;
· The approach to community engagement; and
· The outcomes of community engagement, draft community priorities and vision statement.
Comment
The Wanneroo LAP is the third of its kind to be undertaken and is a key initiative of the City’s Place Framework. It follows a similar structure to the previous two LAP’s for Girrawheen/ Koondoola and Yanchep/ Two Rocks, responding to the unique characteristics of the Local Area and the vision and expectation of the local community for the future.
Feedback and input from local residents into the Wanneroo LAP has been provided at a comparably higher level to that which was received for the Girrawheen Koondoola and Yanchep Two Rocks LAP’s (e.g. less feedback on operational matters). The opportunity for the community to participate in two facilitated workshops was an extension and improvement to previous LAP engagement programs and elicited meaningful input to the developing priorities, vision and action plan.
The comprehensive community engagement process has elicited clear priorities for the Wanneroo Local Area and involvement of local residents in the process has resulted in a draft Vision that reflects local sense of place and future aspirations for Wanneroo. Administration is satisfied that the Wanneroo LAP is strongly representative of the community sentiment for their local area.
The final draft Wanneroo LAP demonstrates and communicates how the City’s current programs, services and capital projects address the priorities identified in the local area. While many of the actions in the LAP are already underway, should Council endorse the final draft LAPs, Administration will commence planning for the implementation of the new initiatives included in the action plan.
This is the third LAP process undertaken by the City, and will contribute to the iterative process that is improved upon as the Plans are reviewed and updated. Key learnings from this process will inform the approach to the review of the Place Framework that is scheduled to take place in this financial year.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.3 Distinctive Places
1.3.1Create distinctive places based on identity of areas”
1.3.2 Create place-based access to local services
1.3.3 Advocate and partner to meet changing community service expectations in place
1.4 Connected Communities
1.4.1 Connect communities through engagement and involvement
1.4.3 Build strong communities through the strength of cultural and heritage diversity”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
This proposal aligns with the Society objective, ‘1.3 Distinctive Places’ of the existing Strategic Community Plan. Council should therefore consider the following risk appetite statement:
The City’s Strategic Community Plan acknowledges that a fundamental emerging need in the community is to create accessible, local, place-based services to maintain and improve our commitment to providing Distinctive Places. The City is aware that this would require ongoing financial cost and capital expenditure which is accepted at a moderate level through a demonstrated approach subject to a robust cost benefit analysis being undertaken to mitigate any potential financial loss. The City also acknowledges that segments of the community will resist change and hence have a negative impact on its reputation. In view of this, the City is prepared to accept risk which can be mitigated by sharing risk and appropriate community consultation and engagement through partnering with appropriate agencies. The City acknowledges that it needs to manage the change to a place-based approach and the impact this may have on the current way of doing business. Therefore the City will accept a moderate amount of reputational and financial risk in order to meet these changing community service expectations.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Initiatives that support the implementation of the Wanneroo LAP are either included in the endorsed 2020/21 Budget or will be listed for consideration in future budget deliberation processes.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ADOPTS the Wanneroo Local Area Plan, included as Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Final draft Wanneroo Local Area Plan |
20/480622 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 291
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 37350 – 20/484537
Responsible Officer: Manager Finance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
For Council to consider the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 October 2020.
Background
In accordance with Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
“Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. For the 2020/21 financial year the statement of financial activity will be presented by nature and type.
Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. For the 2020/21 financial year 10% and a value greater than $100,000 will be used for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
Financial Activity for the Period Ended 31 October 2020
Council adopted the Annual Budget for the 2020-21 financial year on 20 July 2020 (SCS01-07/20). The budget changes proposed in the Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 31 August 2020 have been included in the October 2020 Statement as the report was adopted on 20 October 2020 (CS01-10/20). The figures in this report are compared to the Revised Budget.
The 1st Quarter Budget review results will be incorporated in the November Financial Activity Statement after adoption on the 17th of November 2020.
Overall Comments Month-to-Date
Results from Operations
The Financial Activity Statement report for the month to October 2020 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations before Non-Operating Revenue and Expenses of $7.2m.
The favourable variance is due to higher revenue from Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions, Fees & Charges, Rates, Other Revenue and underspends in Materials & Contracts, Employment costs, Utility charges and Insurance expense.
Capital Program
During October 2020, $4.6m was spent on various capital projects of which $2.8m was spent on roads and sport facilities (Refer to Attachment 3 for more details).
The variance is mainly attributed to the Halesworth Park project and Domestic Waste Vehicles progress payment.
Overall Comments on Year-to-Date (YTD) Figures
Results from Operations
The Financial Activity Statement report for the year-to-date of October 2020 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations of $12.0m.
The favourable variance is due to higher revenue from Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions, Fees & Charges, Rates, Other Revenue, and underspend in Materials & Contracts, Employment costs, Utility charges and Insurance expense.
Capital Program
At the end of October 2020, $13.1m was expended on various capital projects of which $7.8m was spent on roads and sports facilities.
The variance to budget is as noted above related to mainly the Halesworth Park projects and Recycling Trucks.
Investment Portfolio Performance
Detailed Analysis of Statement of Comprehensive Income (Attachment 1)
Comments relating to the Statement of Comprehensive Income are provided under the following two sections:
a) Current month comparison of Actuals to Budgets; and
b) Year to date Actuals to Budgets; where the variance is higher than reporting threshold or item of interest to Council.
Revenues
Note 1 Rates
Month to Date - (Actual $206k, Revised Budget $0k)
The variance is favourable by $206k as a result of higher interim rates generated on Commercial Properties than anticipated during the month.
Year to Date - (Actual $134.9m, Revised Budget $134.5m)
The variance is favourable by $414k as a result of additional properties created in rates database with schedule received from Landgate which differed from when the budget document was compiled and when the Rates were levied.
Note 2 Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date - (Actual $5.0m, Revised Budget $380k)
The favourable variance of $4.7m mainly relates to:
· Settlement of domestic recycling waste dispute of $4.2m, and
· Reimbursement income for legal expenses of $475k.
Year to Date - (Actual $6.4m, Revised Budget $2.5m)
The variance is favourable by $3.9m due to the reasons noted above.
Note 3 Fees and Charges
Month to Date - (Actual $1.7m, Revised Budget $981k)
The City’s services, programs and facilities have been reopened gradually in previous months and slowly the Community confidence has grown after the initial COVID-19 closure to their favourite facilities. At the time of the budget preparation the City had a cautious approach in regards to the timing of the anticipated revenue for 2020/21, which resulted a low base line between July to October 2020 for the estimated income for Fees & Charges.
The favourable variance of $682k for October is summarised below:
· $162k – higher than anticipated number of building services applications and development assessments mainly due to the State Government stimulus on new housing development;
· $123k – increased revenue from green fees, driving range, twilight golf fee from Carramar and Marangaroo golf courses is attributable to increased patronage over that originally anticipated;
· $115k – annual dog and cat registration issued in October resulted in timing variance;
· $59k – increased revenue from engineering supervision fee due to increase in land subdivisions;
· $52k – increase of user or entry fee income driven by public returning to Aquamotion & Kingsway Stadium;
· $37k – domestic waste fee higher than anticipated;
· $31k – increased revenue from verge administration application and engineering assessment fee due to increase in land management activities;
· $24k – increased revenue from health assessment application licence permit fee;
· $19k – increase in facility booking fee income driven by public returning to community centres, Aquamotion, Kingsway Stadium, sporting grounds and libraries and
· $60k - higher than anticipated various other fees and charges.
Year to Date - (Actual $37.4m, Revised Budget $34.2m) – Including Waste Service Fee
The favourable variance of $3.3m is summarised as per below:
· $849k – increase in facility booking fee income driven by public returning to community centres, Aquamotion, Kingsway Stadium, sporting grounds and libraries;
· $655k – increase of user or entry fee income driven by public returning to Aquamotion and Kingsway Stadium;
· $495k – higher than anticipated number of building services applications and development assessments mainly due to the State Government stimulus on new housing development;
· $472k – increased revenue from green fees, driving range and twilight golf fee from Carramar and Marangaroo golf courses is attributable to increased patronage over that originally anticipated;
· $163k – increased revenue from annual health assessment application licence fee;
· $129k – increased revenue from engineering supervision fee due to increase in land subdivisions;
· $105k – domestic waste fee higher than anticipated;
· $83k – increased revenue from verge administration application and engineering assessment fee due to increase in land management activities;
· $62k – increase in annual dog and cat registration fee;
· $19k – greenwaste service fee higher than anticipated; and
· $238k – higher than anticipated various other fees and charges.
Note 4 Other Revenue
Month to Date - (Actual $84k, Revised Budget $32k)
The variance is favourable by $52k due to increase sale of products at Kingsway Stadium, and Aquamotion, increase in building assessments; increase in rebate income in form of fuel tax credits for waste domestic and commercial plants; increase poundage fee for dogs and sale of miscellaneous irrigation equipment.
Year to Date - (Actual $229k, Revised Budget $123k)
The variance is favourable by $106k due to increase in building assessments, sale of abandoned vehicles; increase in rebate income in form of fuel tax credits for waste domestic and commercial plants; sale of miscellaneous irrigation equipment and irrigation works completed to enable road widening at Intersection of Joondalup Drive and Wanneroo Road.
Expenses
Note 5 Employee Costs
Month to Date - (Actual $5.8m, Revised Budget $6.5m)
The variance is favourable by $640k due to lower employee costs mainly arising from deferred recruitment to fill in vacant roles.
Year to Date - (Actual $24.2m, Revised Budget $25.8m)
The variance is favourable by $1.6m due the reasons noted above.
Note 6 Materials & Contracts
Month to Date - (Actual $5.5m, Revised Budget $6.4m)
The variance is favourable by $892k mainly relating to:
· Lower contract expenses by $600k for maintenance of parks, roads reserves and park irrigation;
· Lower material expenses by $130k for maintenance domestic waste trucks, parks, park irrigation and sport grounds;
· Lower consulting fees by $64k for development and review integrated planning framework and limited activities occurring with the Two Rocks Beach Access and Yanchep Lagoon Foreshore Management Plans as originally planned;
· Lower sponsorship expenses by $62k due to cancellation of charity golf day and lower community funding than anticipated;
· Lower tyres expenses of $34k for plants, domestic waste trucks, light and heavy vehicles.
Year to Date - (Actual $22.3m, Revised Budget $24.5m)
The variance is favourable by $2.2m due to:
· Lower material expense of $508k to maintain waste domestic plant, park equipment, road reserves, pathways, operations centre, parks, park irrigation equipment and promote council image;
· Lower debt write-off of $415k as there have been significantly lower financial hardship applications;
· Lower contribution expense of $315k for pitstop park within land development management services and donation to community funding deemed to be a timing difference;
· Lower consulting fees of $245k for development and review integrated planning framework and special project;
· Lower membership subscription of $172k deemed to be a timing difference;
· Lower contract expense of $164k for bushland maintenance;
· Lower refuse removal expense of $112k;
· Lower advertising expenses of $99k and
· Various other material expenses of $170k.
Note 7 Utility Charges
Month to Date - (Actual $766k, Revised Budget $811k)
The variance is favourable by $45k due to lower electricity, telephone expenses, and offset by higher gas usage and water consumption.
Year to Date - (Actual $3.0m, Revised Budget $3.3m)
The variance is favourable by $300k due to lower mobile, telephone expense and electricity usage of which $94k is relates to Street Lighting.
Note 8 Insurance
Month to Date - (Actual $57k, Revised Budget $109k)
City received an unbudgeted credit from our insurers (LGIS) with the City opting to use the Members Experience allowance to offset the monthly expense allocation resulting in a favourable variance of $52k.
Year to Date - (Actual $211k, Revised Budget $437k)
The favourable year to date variance of $225k is a result of the City’s receipt of an unbudgeted credit from its insurer (LGIS). A review of the total annual premiums expense expected for the current financial year, after allowing for any credits, will be undertaken as part of the first quarterly review, with the reduced budget reflected accordingly at that time.
Non Operating Revenue & Expenses
Note 9 Non Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date – (Actual $189k, Revised Budget $2.4m)
The variance is unfavourable by $2.2m and attributable to:
State Government grants of $1.1m:
· $532k MRWA direct grant received in September which was anticipated in October.
· $502k for a 3 Bin Implementation are all restricted grants that have not yet been recognised as income yet until the project is completed.
· $43k for Joondalup Drive - Tumbleweed Drive - Joseph Banks Boulevard intersection pre-deflection to existing roundabout not yet received.
Federal Government grants of $1.1m:
· $1.0m grant for Halesworth park sport facilities not yet received;
· $100k grant for Edgar Griffiths Park carpark not yet received.
Year to Date – (Actual $3.4m, Revised Budget $7.1m)
The variance is unfavourable by $3.7m and attributable to:
State Government grants of $1.9m:
· $1.27m for Hartman Drive Duplication based upon $950k of restricted grants that have not yet been recognised as income, and $320k of funding not yet received; and
· $1.4m for a 3 Bin Implementation $827k of restricted grants that have not yet been recognised as income, and $551k is yet to be received
Offset by:
· $727k grant for Pinjar Road duplication received later than anticipated.
Federal Government grants of $1.1m as noted above.
Cash Contribution of $630k:
· $496k previously received as a contract liability that has not yet been recognised as income; and
· $135k for Marmion Avenue Dualling project not yet received.
Note 10 Profit / Loss on Asset Disposals
Month to Date – (Combined Actual $309k, Combined Revised Budget $0k)
The favourable variance of $309k is a result of a higher proceeds relating to Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) than anticipated.
Year to Date – (Combined Actual $664k, Combined Revised Budget $13.7m)
The variance is unfavourable by $14.3m mainly due to delay in land disposal in relation to Main Roads WA taking over ownership of Ocean Reef Road and Gnangara Road. The City is awaiting the appropriate transfer documentation from Main Roads to process the disposal.
Note 11 TPS & DCP Revenues
Month to Date – (Actual $2.1m, Revised Budget $293k)
The favourable variance is mainly due to increased income of headworks levy for TPS Alkimos/Englington Community facilities (DCP), Cell 7 and Cell 9 higher than anticipated.
Year to Date – (Actual $6.4m, Revised Budget $1.8m)
The favourable variance is mainly due to increased income of headworks levy for TPS Yanchep/Two Rocks Community Facilities and Alkimos/Eglington Community Facilities, for Cell 1, Cell 2, Cell 6, Cell 7, Cell 8 and Cell 9.
Note 12 TPS & DCP Expenses
Month to Date – (Actual $83k, Revised Budget $96k)
The favourable variance of $179k is mainly due to reallocation of cost from TPS to Municipal funds as reported to Council for a pathway for Cell1.
Year to Date – (Actual $1.9m, Revised Budget $2.2m)
The favourable variance of $257k is mainly due to delayed work at Landsdale historical Public Open Space for Cell 5 and offset by surplus funds held for developers for Cell 5 which has been returned during the month.
Statement of Financial Position (Attachment 2)
Note 1 - Net Current Assets
When compared to the opening position at 30 June 2020 Net Current Assets have increased by $125m, which is predominately due to the levying of 2020/21 Rates and Waste Service Fees in July 2020.
Within the Current Assets, Current Receivables of $78m are mainly comprised of collectable Rates and Waste Service Fees debtors of $70m and Emergency Services Levy of $2m, with the remaining balance attributed to General Debtors of $6m.
Note 2 - Non-Current Assets
Non-Current Assets as at 31 October 2020 have decreased by $1.3m from 30 June 2020 Actuals. The movement is due to increase in Work in Progress and Asset Acquisition of $13m partially offset by accumulated depreciation of $14.3m (estimated).
Note 3 - Non-Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities as at 31 October 2020 have increased by $27k due to change in the interest bearing liabilities (Lease).
The existing loan with the Western Australia Treasury Corporation remains unchanged making up 43% of total Non-Current Liabilities.
Financial Performance Indicators
The ratios will be published as part of the Statutory Financial Statements which are currently under review.
Capital Works Program
The status of the Capital Works Program is summarised by Sub-Program in the table below:
During October 2020, $4.6m was spent. Details of significant expenditure for the month are included in Attachment 3. As at 31 October 2020, the City has spent $13.1m, which represents 18.4% of the $71.5m Capital Works Revised Budget.
Capital Changes
The following changes are proposed to be made to the 2020/21 Capital Works budget.
PR-2834 Quinns Rocks Catchment, Upgrade Road Drainage System Program – Additional expenditure of $24,000 has been incurred on this program due to traffic management costs from 2019/20 not being invoiced until this year. It is proposed to fund this from savings identified in the following projects:
· PR-2089 Honeypossum and Boomerang Reserves, Banksia Grove, Renew Sites for Environmental Offset ($4,000)
· PR-2833 Wangara Industrial Area, Upgrade Drainage System ($5,000)
· PR-2973 Yellagonga Regional Park, Upgrade Drainage System ($15,000)
PR -1904 Community Building Asset Renewal Program – It is proposed that additional funds of $65,530 be transferred to this project to urgently replace existing CCTV equipment which is unserviceable. The funds will be sourced from Assets Renewal Reserve resulting no impact on Municipal funds.
PR -2947 Wanneroo Aquomotion Building Asset Renewal Program – It is proposed that additional funds of $41,780 be transferred to this project to urgently replace existing CCTV equipment which is unserviceable. The funds will be sourced from Assets Renewal Reserve resulting no impact on Municipal funds.
Investment Portfolio (Attachment 4)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (and per the City’s Investment Policy), the City invests solely in Authorised Deposit taking Institutions (ADI’s):
At the end of October 2020, the City held an investment portfolio (cash & cash equivalents) of $445.2m (Face Value), equating to $447.7m inclusive of accrued interest. This total portfolio of $447.7m consists of restricted cash of $343.1m and un-restricted cash of $104.6m.
The City’s year to date investment portfolio return has exceeded the UBS Australia Bank Bill rate index benchmark by 0.56% pa (1.07% pa vs. 0.51% pa), however it is noted that Interest Earnings were budgeted at a 1.00% yield.
As global equities tumble and markets contemplate the economic impact of the COVID-19, markets have begun ramping up rate cut expectations across all major economies. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has maintained the Cash Rate at 0.25%, which is affecting the City’s ability to attract higher interest rates from ADI’s.
It should be noted that the RBA lowered the Cash Rate to 0.1% in November 2020 which will impact the City’s ability to generate projected income against budget.
Rate Setting Statement (Attachment 5)
The Rate Setting Statement represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in the Surplus/ (Deficit) based on the Revenues (excluding Rates), Expenses, Capital Works and Funding Movements, resulting in the Rating Income required. It is noted that the closing Surplus/ (Deficit) will balance to the reconciliation of Net Current Assets Surplus/ (Deficit) Carried Forward (detailed as follows):
*The change in the AASB Standard 15 has resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions received as a liability when performance obligations have not yet been met.
Consultation
This document has been prepared in consultation with Responsible Officers for review and analysis.
Comment
In reference to Statement of Comprehensive Income in the report, the following colours have been used to categorise three levels of variance:
Revenues:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red > -10%.
Expenses:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red > -10%.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly financial report complies with Section 6.4 of the Act and Regulations 33A and 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
· Accounting Policy;
· Investment Policy;
· Reserves Policy; and
· Strategic Budget Policy.
Financial Implications
As outlined in the report and detailed in Attachments 1 to 5.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:
1. RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statement and commentaries on variances year to date Budget for the period ended 31 October 2020 consisting of:
a) October 2020 year to date Financial Activity Statement;
b) October 2020 year to date Net Current Assets Position; and
c) October 2020 year to date Material Financial Variance Notes.
2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the following changes to the 2020/21 Capital Works Budget:
|
Number |
From |
To |
Amount |
Description |
|
PR-2834 |
PR-2089 Honeypossum and Boomerang Reserves, renew sites for environmental offset |
PR-2834 Quinns Rocks catchment, upgrade road drainage system |
$4,000 |
Additional funds required for 2019/20 traffic management invoices only received in 2020/21. |
|
PR-2834 |
PR-2833 Wangara Industrial Area, upgrade drainage system |
PR-2834 Quinns Rocks catchment, upgrade road drainage system |
$5,000 |
Additional funds required for 2019/20 traffic management invoices only received in 2020/21. |
|
PR-2834 |
PR-2973 Yellagonga Regional Park, upgrade drainage system |
PR-2834 Quinns Rocks catchment, upgrade road drainage system |
$15,000 |
Additional funds required for 2019/20 traffic management invoices only received in 2020/21. |
|
PR-1904 |
Asset Renewal Reserve |
PR-1904 Recurring Program Renew Community Building Assets |
$65,530 |
Additional funds required for urgent renewal of CCTV equipment. |
|
PR-2947 |
Asset Renewal Reserve |
PR-2947 Recurring Program Renew Aquamotion Building Assets |
$41,780 |
Additional funds required for urgent renewal of CCTV equipment. |
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Statement of Comprehensive Income October 2020 |
20/510204 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Statement of Financial Position October 2020 |
20/510206 |
Minuted |
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Significant Capital Expenditure October 2020 |
20/510208 |
Minuted |
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Investment Report October 2020 |
20/510213 |
Minuted |
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Rate Setting Statement October 2020 |
20/510216 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 310
Transactional Finance
File Ref: 1859V02 – 20/491308
Responsible Officer: Manager Finance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of October 2020, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in October 2020:
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – October 2020 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
120172 - 120361 3953 - 3980 |
$188,800.72 $14,045,327.93 $14,234,128.65
($4,952.13) $6,239.50 ($80,676.41) $14,154,739.61 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – October 2020 Recoup to Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$14,154,739.61
$88,669.86 $3,509,201.80 $17,752,611.27 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – October 2020 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$2,830.33 $4,983.10 $4,284.20 $35,352.83 $6,295.31 $7,652.90 $6,330.66 $4,583.81 $8,363.278 $80,676.41 |
At the close of October 2020, outstanding creditors amounted to $536,879.15.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payment (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of October 2020 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.3 Progressive Organisation
4.3.2 Ensure excellence in our customer service”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of October 2020, as summarised below:-
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – October 2020 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Less Cancelled Cheques Manual Journals Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
120172 - 120361 3953 - 3980 |
$188,800.72 $14,045,327.93 $14,234,128.65
($4,952.13) $6,239.50 ($80,676.41) $14,154,739.61 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – October 2020 Recoup to Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$14,154,739.61
$88,669.86 $3,509,201.80 $17,752,611.27 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – October 2020 Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$2,830.33 $4,983.10 $4,284.20 $35,352.83 $6,295.31 $7,652.90 $6,330.66 $4,583.81 $8,363.278 $80,676.41 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS OCTOBER 2020 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00120172 |
06/10/2020 |
Xylem Water Solutions Australia Limited |
$38,302.00 |
|
|
|
Final Invoice - Yellagonga Wetland Job - ICT |
|
|
00120173 |
06/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$763.71 |
|
00120174 |
06/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$540.30 |
|
00120175 |
06/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$494.00 |
|
00120176 |
06/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$253.07 |
|
00120177 |
06/10/2020 |
Dawn Parke |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Not Required |
|
|
00120178 |
06/10/2020 |
Mark Frazer |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Incomplete |
|
|
00120179 |
06/10/2020 |
Evelyn Anne Jansen |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120180 |
06/10/2020 |
Dalal Salloomi |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120181 |
06/10/2020 |
Tejaswini Rao |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120182 |
06/10/2020 |
Dylan Drendel |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120183 |
06/10/2020 |
Mena Megalaa |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120184 |
06/10/2020 |
Penny Stratford |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120185 |
06/10/2020 |
Ascend Financial Freedom |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120186 |
06/10/2020 |
Diane Lloyd |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120187 |
06/10/2020 |
Lauren Le Donne |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120188 |
06/10/2020 |
Flora Sharafizad |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120189 |
06/10/2020 |
Saurabh Patel |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120190 |
06/10/2020 |
Saurabh Patel |
$27.80 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120191 |
06/10/2020 |
Alzheimers Australia WA Ltd |
$81.90 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00120192 |
06/10/2020 |
Glenister Family Trust |
$29.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Caravan Park Licence Fee - Overcharged |
|
|
00120193 |
13/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$818.28 |
|
00120194 |
13/10/2020 |
Lucinda Meredith |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120195 |
13/10/2020 |
The Rare Budgerigar Club of WA Incorporated |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120196 |
13/10/2020 |
Elizabeth Murran |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120197 |
13/10/2020 |
Lee-Ann Clements |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120198 |
13/10/2020 |
Katie Wheatley |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120199 |
13/10/2020 |
Zoltan Nagy |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120200 |
13/10/2020 |
Atalla Abbas |
$215.40 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Overpaid |
|
|
00120201 |
13/10/2020 |
Perth Patio Magic |
$166.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Fee - Duplicate |
|
|
00120202 |
13/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$1,800.36 |
|
00120203 |
13/10/2020 |
Matthew Ryan Hall |
$166.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Rejected |
|
|
00120204 |
13/10/2020 |
M & D Savic |
$932.79 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Rejected |
|
|
00120205 |
13/10/2020 |
Kirsten Allan |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120206 |
13/10/2020 |
Ajit Varsani |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120207 |
13/10/2020 |
Lan Yu |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120208 |
13/10/2020 |
Angela Holmes |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120209 |
13/10/2020 |
Claire Williamson |
$166.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Rejected |
|
|
00120210 |
13/10/2020 |
Department of Child Protection |
$34.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120211 |
13/10/2020 |
Airu Wang |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Cancelled |
|
|
00120212 |
13/10/2020 |
Pure Style Engineering & Design |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Merged |
|
|
00120213 |
13/10/2020 |
Mathew Falcinella |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Septic Plan Request - No Septic Tank On Property |
|
|
00120214 |
13/10/2020 |
Dhisha Kara |
$42.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Fitness Membership - Can No Longer Attend Due To Timetable Change |
|
|
00120215 |
13/10/2020 |
Applied Education |
$2,065.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Diploma Of Payroll Services - 1 Attendee - Payroll |
|
|
00120216 |
13/10/2020 |
Louisa Jane Holdings Pty Ltd |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Reissue Of Stale Cheque - Hire Of 2 ATM's On A Trailer - Global Beats & Eats - Communications & Events |
|
|
00120217 |
13/10/2020 |
Toro Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,705.59 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
00120218 |
13/10/2020 |
Clarkson Youth Centre Petty Cash |
$40.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120219 |
13/10/2020 |
Health Services Petty Cash |
$134.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120220 |
13/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$145.07 |
|
00120221 |
13/10/2020 |
Water Corporation |
$3,110.00 |
|
|
|
Headworks - Dalvik Park - Projects |
|
|
00120222 |
13/10/2020 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$4,447.89 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00120223 |
13/10/2020 |
Cr X Nguyen |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
00120224 |
06/10/2020 |
Brighton Reticulation |
$156.70 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Damaged Reticulation Baltimore Parade - Parks |
|
|
00120225 |
20/10/2020 |
A D Engineering International Pty Ltd |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Callout & Repairs - Kingsway |
|
|
00120226 |
20/10/2020 |
Austwide Consumer Products Pty Ltd |
$397.32 |
|
|
|
Kick Boards - Aquamotion |
|
|
00120227 |
20/10/2020 |
Cancer Council WA |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - Relay For Life - Communications & Brand |
|
|
00120228 |
20/10/2020 |
Glevan Consulting |
$4,792.70 |
|
|
|
Registered Interpreter - Pinjar Park Documents - Parks |
|
|
00120229 |
20/10/2020 |
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$298.93 |
|
|
|
Fire Boots - Emergency Services |
|
|
00120230 |
20/10/2020 |
Premier Event Concepts |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - National Economic Development Conference 18 - 20.11.2020 - Economic Development |
|
|
00120231 |
20/10/2020 |
Rowe Scientific Pty Ltd |
$432.30 |
|
|
|
Calcium Chloride - Health Services |
|
|
00120232 |
20/10/2020 |
Greyhounds Christian Soccer Club Incorporated |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120233 |
20/10/2020 |
Letisha Palmer |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120234 |
20/10/2020 |
Maunsell Anderson |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120235 |
20/10/2020 |
Tegan Daniels |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120236 |
20/10/2020 |
Linda Kerbey |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120237 |
20/10/2020 |
Hayden Rhys Tabuteau |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120238 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$751.78 |
|
00120239 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$580.81 |
|
00120240 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$161.73 |
|
00120241 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$715.99 |
|
00120242 |
20/10/2020 |
Antonietta D'Elia |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120243 |
20/10/2020 |
Inga Peirce |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120244 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$917.83 |
|
00120245 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$614.23 |
|
00120246 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$584.67 |
|
00120247 |
20/10/2020 |
Pinakinbhai Patel |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120248 |
20/10/2020 |
Alejandro Ferraz |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120249 |
20/10/2020 |
Josephine San Diego |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120250 |
20/10/2020 |
Black Swan Taekwondo Incorporated |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120251 |
20/10/2020 |
Brighton Seahawks Junior Football Club |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120252 |
20/10/2020 |
Sailesh K Hirani |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120253 |
20/10/2020 |
Brandon James McGufficke |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120254 |
20/10/2020 |
Michelle Santoro |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120255 |
20/10/2020 |
Kathy Sierociak |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120256 |
20/10/2020 |
Edmund Rice Centre WA Incorporated |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120257 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$578.88 |
|
00120258 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$169.45 |
|
00120259 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$925.55 |
|
00120260 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$640.25 |
|
00120261 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00120262 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$660.26 |
|
00120263 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$566.54 |
|
00120264 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$660.26 |
|
00120265 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$656.32 |
|
00120266 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$700.27 |
|
00120267 |
20/10/2020 |
Tejaswini G Rao |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120268 |
20/10/2020 |
MJ Rooker |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120269 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$462.48 |
|
00120270 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$494.00 |
|
00120271 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$50.00 |
|
00120272 |
20/10/2020 |
Gortankaku Community Association WA |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120273 |
20/10/2020 |
Sean Rowe |
$73.10 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Paid Twice - Reissue Of Stale Cheque |
|
|
00120274 |
20/10/2020 |
Broadwater Builds |
$157.80 |
|
|
|
Refund - Fees Paid For Preliminary Assessment - Rejected - Reissue Of Stale Cheque |
|
|
00120275 |
20/10/2020 |
Megan Dixon |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Septic Plan Fee - Unable To Provide - Reissue Of Stale Cheque |
|
|
00120276 |
20/10/2020 |
Tanita Deprazer |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120277 |
20/10/2020 |
Rebecca Beech |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120278 |
20/10/2020 |
Steven Shellard |
$53.60 |
|
|
|
Refund - Booking Cancelled - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre |
|
|
00120279 |
20/10/2020 |
Narelle Lee |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120280 |
20/10/2020 |
Fiona Stevenson |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120281 |
20/10/2020 |
Teresa Davidson |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120282 |
20/10/2020 |
Clare Carberry |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120283 |
20/10/2020 |
Tejaswini G Rao |
$594.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00120284 |
20/10/2020 |
Diti Thakkar |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Holiday Program - Child Injured |
|
|
00120285 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$536.00 |
|
00120286 |
20/10/2020 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00120287 |
20/10/2020 |
Rosalina Chua |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120288 |
20/10/2020 |
Kirsten Stoney |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120289 |
20/10/2020 |
Tracey Edmunds |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120290 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$200.00 |
|
00120291 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$200.00 |
|
00120292 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$284.21 |
|
00120293 |
20/10/2020 |
Helen O'Hara |
$34.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120294 |
20/10/2020 |
Teresa Davidson |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Laser Tag - Youth Services |
|
|
00120295 |
20/10/2020 |
Keyuri Patel |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Abstract Art Workshop - Youth Services |
|
|
00120296 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$13,947.66 |
|
00120297 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00120298 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$20,642.37 |
|
00120299 |
20/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$1,722.99 |
|
00120300 |
20/10/2020 |
Finance Services Petty Cash |
$685.90 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120301 |
20/10/2020 |
Telstra |
$27,717.79 |
|
|
|
Communications Charges For The City |
|
|
00120302 |
27/10/2020 |
Rates Refund |
$837.07 |
|
00120303 |
27/10/2020 |
Tahnee Barrett |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120304 |
27/10/2020 |
Felix Wojcik |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120305 |
27/10/2020 |
Thawng Thang |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120306 |
27/10/2020 |
Ahmad Mahmood Al Sheikh Shaker |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120307 |
27/10/2020 |
Liza Hemsted |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Mobile Laser Tag - Cancelled |
|
|
00120308 |
27/10/2020 |
St Kieran Catholic Primary |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00120309 |
27/10/2020 |
O Schutz |
$33.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Cancelled |
|
|
00120310 |
27/10/2020 |
David Butchart |
$73.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Planning Research Fee Application - Withdrawn |
|
|
00120311 |
27/10/2020 |
Michael Badman |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Proposal Exempt |
|
|
00120312 |
27/10/2020 |
J Trafford |
$368.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Hire Fees - Subsidised Use |
|
|
00120313 |
27/10/2020 |
Matthew Keith |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Plans Not Available |
|
|
00120314 |
27/10/2020 |
The Marina Mindarie |
$570.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Building Event - Cancelled |
|
|
00120315 |
27/10/2020 |
Belinda Silveira |
$198.72 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Cancelled |
|
|
00120316 |
27/10/2020 |
Zoe J Della |
$198.72 |
|
|
|
Refund - Swimming Lessons - Cancelled |
|
|
00120317 |
27/10/2020 |
Balmoral International Investments |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120318 |
27/10/2020 |
Brightwater Pool Madeley |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120319 |
27/10/2020 |
Burbridge School Pool |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120320 |
27/10/2020 |
Celtic Builders |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Refund Copies Of Plans - Copies Not Available |
|
|
00120321 |
27/10/2020 |
Butler College |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120322 |
27/10/2020 |
The Owners of College Park Strata Plan 62783 |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120323 |
27/10/2020 |
G8 Education |
$305.35 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business - Sold |
|
|
00120324 |
27/10/2020 |
Glenister Family Trust |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120325 |
27/10/2020 |
Harbourside Village Pool |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120326 |
27/10/2020 |
John Butler Primary College |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120327 |
27/10/2020 |
La Fortuna Pty Ltd |
$85.17 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120328 |
27/10/2020 |
Debra McIsaac |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120329 |
27/10/2020 |
RAAFA Retirement Village Pool |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120330 |
27/10/2020 |
Regents Garden Residential Care Resort |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120331 |
27/10/2020 |
Serenitas Communities Holdings Pty Ltd |
$85.17 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120332 |
27/10/2020 |
Serenitas Communities Holdings Pty Ltd |
$85.17 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120333 |
27/10/2020 |
Sevenoaks Retirement Village |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120334 |
27/10/2020 |
Stateswim Systems Franchising |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120335 |
27/10/2020 |
Strata 15622 Ocean Reef Caravan Village |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120336 |
27/10/2020 |
The Owners of Portaferry Gardens |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120337 |
27/10/2020 |
The Pavilion Mindarie |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120338 |
27/10/2020 |
The Rise by Teman |
$66.67 |
|
|
|
Refund - Public Swimming Pool Sampling - Overcharged |
|
|
00120339 |
27/10/2020 |
Mama Bakhita |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Section 40 Certificate - Application Rejected |
|
|
00120340 |
27/10/2020 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00120341 |
27/10/2020 |
Lan Yu |
$94.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Term 4 Junior Clinic - Kingsway |
|
|
00120342 |
27/10/2020 |
Anne Thompson |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Mobile Laser Tag - Cancelled |
|
|
00120343 |
27/10/2020 |
Lois-Jae Fulcher |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Everything Halloween - Cancelled |
|
|
00120344 |
27/10/2020 |
Lining Duan |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Everything Halloween - Cancelled |
|
|
00120345 |
27/10/2020 |
Aiko Kalina |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Everything Halloween - Cancelled |
|
|
00120346 |
27/10/2020 |
Maria Cardoso |
$6.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Everything Halloween - Cancelled |
|
|
00120347 |
27/10/2020 |
Lee Sullivan |
$10.80 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00120348 |
27/10/2020 |
Vicki Smith |
$10.80 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00120349 |
27/10/2020 |
Mohammad Mahmoodi |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Mobile Laser Tag - Cancelled |
|
|
00120350 |
27/10/2020 |
Sarah McNally |
$107.20 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund - Halmstad Park |
|
|
00120351 |
27/10/2020 |
Florence Lewis |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 8 Weeks Of Junior Clinic Term Pass - Kingsway |
|
|
00120352 |
27/10/2020 |
Clarkson Library Petty Cash |
$201.20 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120353 |
27/10/2020 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$65.70 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120354 |
27/10/2020 |
Telstra |
$234.48 |
|
|
|
Messaging / Data / Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00120355 |
27/10/2020 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$105.50 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00120356 |
27/10/2020 |
Yanchep Two Rocks Community Recreation Association |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Grant Funding - Volunteers Breakfast 2020 - Community Planning |
|
|
00120357 |
27/10/2020 |
City of Armadale |
$7,026.52 |
|
|
|
Long Service Leave Recoup - Payroll |
|
|
00120358 |
27/10/2020 |
Elevator Direction |
$2,343.00 |
|
|
|
Lift Inspection - Projects |
|
|
00120359 |
27/10/2020 |
Ms Oriel Green |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Welcome To Country - Landsdale Skate Park Opening - Youth Services |
|
|
00120360 |
27/10/2020 |
Jana Braddock |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
2 Arts TNT Talks 2020 - Cultural Development |
|
|
00120361 |
27/10/2020 |
RIKLAN Emergency Management Service |
$7,932.76 |
|
|
|
Training - Drive Vehicles Under Operational Conditions - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$188,800.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00003953 |
01/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Press (2013) Pty Ltd |
$1,188.00 |
|
|
|
Active Travel Maps - Wanneroo North - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$8,272.83 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$93.37 |
|
|
|
Gas Bottles - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Alina Behan |
$16,200.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting - Collaboration Review & Final Drive Of Building Specification Guidelines, Preparation Of Architectural Brief - Building |
|
|
|
|
All Class Tiling Services Pty Ltd |
$9,240.00 |
|
|
|
Night Works - Point Drain - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Australia Pty Ltd |
$12,375.00 |
|
|
|
Seeds & Wetting Agent - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Archival Survival Pty Ltd |
$109.64 |
|
|
|
4 A3 Holepunched Sleeves - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$276.74 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$1,539.10 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Lens Wipes - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Australian Property Consultants |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Market Rent Assessment - Kingsway - Property |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$436.70 |
|
|
|
Paper Supply - Printroom |
|
|
|
|
Bee Advice |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Treatment Of Bee Hives - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$941.82 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bidfood Perth |
$587.33 |
|
|
|
Catering Items - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Fencing - James Spiers Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$260.09 |
|
|
|
Corporate Uniform - Employee Issue |
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd |
$12,100.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Sports Amenities Building - Halesworth Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$2,628.89 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$1,795.27 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$1,330.53 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Canon Production Printing Australia Pty Ltd |
$101.62 |
|
|
|
Scanner - Basic Charge September - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$486.20 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal - Parks |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$7,682.40 |
|
|
|
Ninite Pro Monthly Subscription For 850 Devices - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Dell Battery - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$1,596.92 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Children's Book Council of Australia WA Branch Incorporated |
$410.00 |
|
|
|
Bookmarks, Posters, Bunting, Lanyards & Stickers - Book Week - Libraries |
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Photography - 28 Aboriginal Images - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Photography - Citizenship Ceremonies - Communications & Brand |
|
|
|
|
City of Vincent |
$1,914.95 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Long Service Leave - D Paton - Payroll |
|
|
|
|
CK Maloney Surveying |
$4,397.33 |
|
|
|
Boundary Marking - Gnangara - Property |
|
|
|
|
Clayton Utz |
$40,628.84 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$453.47 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Aquatics Australia |
$3,525.50 |
|
|
|
Equipment Repairs - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Constable Care Child Safety Foundation Incorporation |
$30,329.75 |
|
|
|
3 Year Sponsorship Agreement - Year Two Payment 2020 / 2021 - Communications And Brand |
|
|
|
|
Converge International Pty Ltd |
$9,762.50 |
|
|
|
Employee Support Services - 01.09.2020 - 30.11.2020 - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$3,168.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - Fire Assets - Planning |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$5,730.70 |
|
|
|
Court Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$404.44 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Datavoice Communications Pty Ltd |
$9,999.00 |
|
|
|
20 Avaya Handsets - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$41,952.54 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping / Drain Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Driving Wheels |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Wheel Alignment - WN 31963 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Dual Autos Pty Ltd |
$394.70 |
|
|
|
Replace Key Fob - WN 33285 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$2,646.54 |
|
|
|
Case Management 03/09/2020 - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Associates |
$7,271.00 |
|
|
|
Master Plan & Cost Estimate - Trentham Park - Community Facilities Planning |
|
|
|
|
Concept Design And Cost Estimate - Splendid Park - Community Facilities Planning |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$184,706.66 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
EPM Partners Pty Ltd |
$21,780.00 |
|
|
|
EPM System WALK Stage 2 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Credit Rating Pty Ltd |
$951.72 |
|
|
|
Financial Assessment Reports - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$12,870.00 |
|
|
|
Lighting Design - Proposal - Multiple Sites - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Consulting - CCTV & Automatic Gates Capacity - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Forrest And Forrest Games |
$303.60 |
|
|
|
Soil & Tissue Analysis - Belvoir Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$4,268.00 |
|
|
|
Flat Hose Testing - Quinn Rock Bush Fire Brigade - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$28,965.20 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Globe Australia |
$1,952.50 |
|
|
|
Establish Fertiliser - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$962.50 |
|
|
|
Quarterly Maintenance - Yanchep And Eglinton Open Space - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$3,647.41 |
|
|
|
Granite Railway Ballast - Franklin / Rousset - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore Joondalup |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Panasonic Microwave - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$959.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Bench - Treeside - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repaint Internal Door - Lake Joondalup - Assets |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$15,332.70 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$755.11 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
HS Hyde & Son |
$5,944.13 |
|
|
|
Restoration Works - Entry Sign At Marangaroo Golf - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$52,048.70 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Pump Service - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Lake Steps - Ridgewood Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$105,268.47 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Image Bollards |
$781.00 |
|
|
|
Retractable Bollard - Queenscliff Car Park - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Innovyze Pty Ltd |
$2,172.50 |
|
|
|
Infocare Licence Renewal - 15.11.2020 - 14.11.2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$12,570.12 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intelife Group |
$4,503.13 |
|
|
|
BBQ Maintenance May 2020 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$1,891.29 |
|
|
|
Gloves, Helmet & Disposable Flat Fold Mask - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$5,346.92 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services - IM |
|
|
|
|
Irri-Tronics |
$808.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Rainbird Controllers - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$207.33 |
|
|
|
Disinfection Of Pools Chlorine Gas Supply - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$1,229.00 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd |
$6,801.18 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$1,798.18 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
High Pressure Clean - Warradale Skate Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$4,038.38 |
|
|
|
Toner Kit - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
|
Replacement Printer - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$12,421.08 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$48,735.84 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$866.46 |
|
|
|
License Fees - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Mackay Urban Design |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel Meeting 21.09.2020 - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$64.82 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$10,493.69 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$167,096.16 |
|
|
|
2772 Green Bin Lids & 6 Containers - Waste |
|
|
|
|
McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd |
$15,142.81 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 16 - Kingsway Olympic Clubrooms - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$4,936.51 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$551,555.61 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$6,543.20 |
|
|
|
Play Equipment Repairs - Parks |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$367.84 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores / Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$3,158.14 |
|
|
|
Beach Access Way Maintenance - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Navman Wireless Australia Pty Ltd |
$286.00 |
|
|
|
Transfer GPS From Plant No 96075 To 96210 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Noma Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel Attendance - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$1,606.99 |
|
|
|
Chainsaw Chain - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Blower - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$27,735.65 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$539.00 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$968.00 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$5,388.36 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Randal |
$92.40 |
|
|
|
Subscription - Financial Review - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$1,677.50 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$30,441.07 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 11 - Connolly Drive - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 18 - Marmion Avenue - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$154.84 |
|
|
|
Asphalt - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Rogers Axle & Spring Works Pty Ltd |
$2,437.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Scatena Clocherty Architects |
$11,620.40 |
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy - Shelvock Sports Amenities Building - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$432.00 |
|
|
|
Lawn Mix - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$5,539.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$1,726.69 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$433.51 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$1,595.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Softfall - Gary Meinke Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Repair - St Andrews Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$451.20 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sphere Architects |
$1,559.80 |
|
|
|
Handrail Compliance Report - Kingsway Stadium - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$61.99 |
|
|
|
Sprayer - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$1,946.76 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies / Training For The City |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$379.39 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Sunlim Pty Ltd |
$862.40 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - 1 Day Consultation - Review & Recommendation Of Current Network Infrastructure (Switching To Wan) - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Task Exchange Pty Ltd |
$11,598.40 |
|
|
|
LG Hub Cloud Package - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$2,156.00 |
|
|
|
Jo Gray Consulting - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$3,935.80 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Basketball Man |
$2,204.40 |
|
|
|
Install Nets And Backboard - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Factory (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$655.05 |
|
|
|
Storage Of Christmas Decorations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$30.25 |
|
|
|
Wirerope - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$462.00 |
|
|
|
Watch Around Water Wristbands - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Tim Eva's Nursery |
$1,683.00 |
|
|
|
Plants For Parks |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$7,776.45 |
|
|
|
Mulch - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$948.64 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$38,646.85 |
|
|
|
Install Picnic Shelter - Hudson Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install - Park Shelter & Solar Lighting - Lighthouse Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Supply Temporary Fencing - Badgerup Reserve - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Seat Relocation - Scenic Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Skillion Style Shelter - Hudson Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Training Services Australia |
$950.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Safety & Health Representative Workshop 07 - 11-09.2020 - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$8,031.10 |
|
|
|
Reticulations Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$146.45 |
|
|
|
Trophies - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$117,945.56 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade |
$380.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Skip Bin For Brigade Busy Bee - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Uthando Project |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
100 Doll Making Kits - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$438.15 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - 12 Month Registration For Trailers - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Fuel - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Tyre Inflators - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$23,136.07 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade |
$89.84 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Interfire Agencies Invoice 02844 - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Shade Pty Ltd |
$2,475.00 |
|
|
|
Install Shade Sails - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Repair Shade Sail - Butler Community Centre - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Remove / Store Shade Sails - Parks |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$47,974.30 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$70.54 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$1,515.55 |
|
|
|
Growth Alliance Perth and Peel - City of Wanneroo Portion of Consultant's Fees - Federal Regional Sporting Facilities - Variation to Stage 1 Business Case |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$13,661.10 |
|
|
|
Transport / Processing Of Green Waste - Waste |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Tender - Probity Oversite - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$173.70 |
|
|
|
Work Boots - PPE - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$787.60 |
|
|
|
Rehabilitation - Ocean Reef Road - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Wrong Fuel Rescue Pty Ltd |
$848.15 |
|
|
|
Call Out - Fuel Drain - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Zenien |
$206.25 |
|
|
|
Consulting - Resolve Internet Issues In Room 8 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003954 |
01/10/2020 |
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003955 |
06/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$7,887.39 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003956 |
06/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$2,695.44 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Apparel |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$20,214.15 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
AE Hoskins Building Services |
$9,432.51 |
|
|
|
Replace Gutter - Shed A & N - Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Replace Skylights - Butler Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Amgrow Australia Pty Ltd |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Freight Charges - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$494.02 |
|
|
|
Welding Helmet - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Aussie Natural Spring Water |
$21.00 |
|
|
|
15ltr Return Swap Over Bottles - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$529.44 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$71.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - Aquamotion - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Australian Security Technology Pty Ltd |
$24,910.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Booking & Key Management System - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Bee Advice |
$160.00 |
|
|
|
Remove Bee Swarm - Waddington Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$3,869.63 |
|
|
|
Uniforms - Aquamotion & Kingsway Staff |
|
|
|
|
Bo Wong Photography |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
TNT Presentation - How To Photograph Your Artwork - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
BOC Limited |
$59.01 |
|
|
|
Gas Bottle Rentals - Fleet / Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$3,542.77 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$5,306.66 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$828.30 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$3,552.16 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble For The City |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$97,250.12 |
|
|
|
40 Latitude Notebooks - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$1,346.92 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$18,842.75 |
|
|
|
Web Services API Layer - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$3,280.20 |
|
|
|
Fire Detection Equipment Servicing For The City |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$88.00 |
|
|
|
Court Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$14,190.00 |
|
|
|
Drain Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Duratec Australia |
$3,322.00 |
|
|
|
Roof Inspections - Ashby Operations Centre - Strategic Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$2,687.11 |
|
|
|
Retic Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
EnvisionWare Pty Ltd |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Upgrade Of PC And Printers - Microsoft 10 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
FE Technologies Pty Ltd |
$21,788.80 |
|
|
|
Self Loan Station - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Flick Anticimex Pty Ltd |
$3,875.63 |
|
|
|
Sanitary Waste Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Consultancy - Edgar Griffith Carpark - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd |
$88.00 |
|
|
|
Spray Adhesive - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$6,545.69 |
|
|
|
Hose Repairs - Quinns Rocks / Two Rocks/Wanneroo - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Appliance Service - Truck & Cab - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$75,477.20 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Global Marine Enclosures Pty Ltd |
$2,479.29 |
|
|
|
Winter Maintenance - September 2020 - Coastal Projects |
|
|
|
|
Groeneveld Lubrication Solutions Pty Ltd |
$218.58 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$14,130.60 |
|
|
|
Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$42,615.96 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$496.10 |
|
|
|
Stickers - Christmas Appeal - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$33,578.71 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
JB Hi Fi Group Pty Ltd |
$99.90 |
|
|
|
2 TV Wall Mounts - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Jurovich Surveying Pty Ltd |
$1,232.00 |
|
|
|
Survey / Pegging - Beach Signs - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$9,368.59 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Grand Paradiso - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$850.30 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$26,094.86 |
|
|
|
Toner Kit - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Replacement Information Management Scanner - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Landmark Products Limited |
$10,983.50 |
|
|
|
Balustrade Removal - Two Rocks Beach Access - Coastal Projects |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$2,367.20 |
|
|
|
Spray Glyphosate - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Tubestock - Entry Statement - Breakwater Estate - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Malco Flooring Pty Ltd |
$1,034.00 |
|
|
|
Repairs - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$27,849.13 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$167,096.16 |
|
|
|
2772 360 Litre Bins With Yellow Lids - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Matrix Traffic and Transport Data Pty Ltd |
$935.00 |
|
|
|
Traffic Count - Lukin - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Meter Office |
$239.80 |
|
|
|
Black On White Tape - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$5,937.15 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$264,853.50 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mini-Tankers Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,314.79 |
|
|
|
Fuel - September - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Navman Wireless Australia Pty Ltd |
$17,771.60 |
|
|
|
Install GPS Units - 58 Vehicles - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Neverfail Springwater Limited |
$31.20 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies - Printroom |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$336.09 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
NTT Australia Pty Ltd |
$851.40 |
|
|
|
Software Licence - ICT |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$6,612.48 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$297.00 |
|
|
|
Transport Mower To Ashby - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$11,930.96 |
|
|
|
Alarm / CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Fence - Honey Possum Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,371.25 |
|
|
|
Lease Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Riskwest |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - Realigning Your Business Continuity And Pandemic Plans 23.09.2020 - 1 Attendee - Legal |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$510,489.42 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 11 & 13 - Hartman Drive Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
RM Gillis & CJ Marci |
$1,552.50 |
|
|
|
Picking / Delivering Mayors Appeal Bin - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Removal Of Furniture From Girrawheen To Wanneroo - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$517.00 |
|
|
|
Spotting - Westport / Melmore Roundabout - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$68,376.89 |
|
|
|
Roadworks For The City |
|
|
|
|
Rubek Automatic Doors |
$726.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Door - WLCC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd |
$3,111.70 |
|
|
|
Lift And/Or Escalator Service - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$52.00 |
|
|
|
Landscape Mix & Brickies Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$382.00 |
|
|
|
Clean Bricks - Pembury - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Sport and Recreation Surfaces |
$4,400.00 |
|
|
|
Tennis Course Maintenance - Elliot Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$433.64 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies & Training Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$264.00 |
|
|
|
Fix Fault - Aquamotion Hydro Backwash Pit - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$4,123.90 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Teknacool Marketing |
$662.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Kerb Numbers - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$20,706.22 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For Apex Gates Trust |
$978.40 |
|
|
|
Replace 4 X Gate Rollers - Ashby Operations Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Talis Unit Trust |
$16,500.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Infrastructure Asset Valuations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$3,345.65 |
|
|
|
Mulch - Marmion Avenue - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$739.44 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$14,564.00 |
|
|
|
Install Drink Fountain - Liddell Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
TQuip |
$203.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$6,274.40 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$957.35 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$28,430.72 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks SES Unit |
$8,195.83 |
|
|
|
Local Government Grant Scheme - Quarter 2 Contribution To Operating Costs - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Vermeer (WA & NT) |
$1,872.52 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Webinar - How To Create A Happy Sales Culture - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$27,923.90 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$195.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Financial Reports & Budgets - Mayor Roberts |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$2,061.44 |
|
|
|
Empty Washdown Bay - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Service Grease Trap - Koondoola Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$14,784.55 |
|
|
|
Weed Control Services - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$236.50 |
|
|
|
Monthly Collection - Oil Waste Disposal - Waste |
|
|
|
|
WSP Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,840.00 |
|
|
|
Facilitator - Smart City Workshop - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture |
$3,064.17 |
|
|
|
Adjustment Related To Budgeted Amounts Had Been Greater Than Actuals Yanchep Hub - Rent 2020 / 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Zetta Group |
$9,782.37 |
|
|
|
Network Managed Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003957 |
06/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Development Application Fees - DA2020/1355 For Proposed Principal Use Only Sign As Part Of Contract 01141 |
|
|
|
|
Decipha Pty Ltd |
$1,746.32 |
|
|
|
Monthly Mailroom Service Fee - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,622.05 |
|
|
|
Landgate |
$1,139.74 |
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - 05 - 18.09.2020 - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$367.05 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$7,372.82 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Property Adjustment 2019 / 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$270.53 |
|
|
|
Mr Tod Brennan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mr Wayne Crawford |
$107.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Surgery Consultation - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,586.84 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,221.79 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$531.55 |
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$176.37 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging For August 2020 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Pen and Paper Girl |
$420.75 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advice And Training Rebate |
|
|
|
|
Urban Development Institute of Australia WA Division Incorporated |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Training - WA Greenfields Development Market - Webinar 20.05.2020 - Planning Registration - Medium Density Code 11.09.2020 - 1 Attendee - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,408.09 |
|
|
|
WAMX (Incorporated) |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - 2 Team Members To Attend The WAMX Make Smoking History State Championship In Bunbury 07 - 08.11.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$330.51 |
|
|
|
Water Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003958 |
07/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$17,195.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003959 |
09/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bistel Construction Pty Ltd |
$396,728.12 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment 6 - Leatherback Park Sports Amenities Building - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Geared Construction Pty Ltd |
$32,906.50 |
|
|
|
Progress Payment 8 - Timelock Installation - Ferrara Park, Hainsworth Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003960 |
12/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Access Without Barriers Pty Ltd |
$166,954.97 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 & 2 - Kingsway Olympic Soccer Clubrooms Ablution Refurbishment - Assets |
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,114.64 |
|
|
|
Fuel - September 2020 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003961 |
12/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation & Safety |
$88,355.60 |
|
|
|
Collection Agency Fee Payments - 01.09.2020 - 30.09.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$2,272.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003962 |
13/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$577,941.98 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003963 |
13/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$126.25 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$92.10 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$671.40 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$568,127.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Blueprint Homes (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,697.78 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$5,495.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$692.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Cr Christopher Baker |
$409.40 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance 27.08.2020 - 07.10.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$1,156.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Search Fees - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Network |
$1,617.90 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging - 29.09.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Halpd Pty Ltd Trading As Affordable Living Homes |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$622.90 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Home Group WA Pty Ltd |
$6,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 3 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$367.05 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$392,792.94 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Workcare - 31.10.2020 - 30.06.2021 |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,650.26 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Luxury Living WA Pty Ltd Trading As Status Residential |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$8,420.75 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$656.32 |
|
|
|
Mr Chong Chan |
$77.50 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$3,100.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$552.88 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$742.27 |
|
|
|
Mr Glenn McGinnis |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Graham Woodard |
$243.55 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payments |
|
|
|
|
Mr John Dowrick |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mr Kimberley Ashe |
$900.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$640.25 |
|
|
|
Mr Ricky Pope |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Shawn Simpson |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Donna Boobyer |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$149.75 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$630.25 |
|
|
|
Mrs Patricia Proudlove |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$143.40 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$823.38 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$640.00 |
|
|
|
Ms Feihong Ye |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$409.45 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$560.92 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$2,789.00 |
|
|
|
Ms Peggy Brown |
$115.00 |
|
|
|
Keyholder Payments |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$378.32 |
|
|
|
Optus |
$1,356.25 |
|
|
|
Mobile Charges For The City - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,853.49 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$7,934.17 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
SSB Pty Ltd |
$6,391.54 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Services Levy Only - Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
Refund - 3 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$557.15 |
|
|
|
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$2,144.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Verge Licence Application Fee - Withdrawn |
|
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$1,054.77 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$52,494.99 |
|
|
|
Streetlight Relocation - Joondalup/Tumbleweed - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003964 |
13/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acurix Networks Pty Ltd |
$4,452.80 |
|
|
|
Monitoring Licensing Support - October 2020 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$969.38 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
AFGRI Equipment Australia Pty Ltd |
$363.72 |
|
|
|
Mower Blades - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Allied Pickfords - Business Relocations |
$739.56 |
|
|
|
Removal Fees - Belhaven Park Clubrooms - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Aquamaster Reticulation Services |
$986.70 |
|
|
|
Repair Reticulation Leaks - Kingsway - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Archae-Aus |
$2,824.25 |
|
|
|
Phase 1 - Warradale Park Eco-Lighting - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Aslab Pty Ltd |
$5,610.00 |
|
|
|
Sampling / Testing Profile Holes - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$1,006.75 |
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty Ltd |
$1,325.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Excavator & Confined Space Entry - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Best Consultants Pty Ltd |
$627.00 |
|
|
|
Floodlighting Project DLP Inspection - Heath & Paloma - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Better Impact Pty Ltd |
$2,304.00 |
|
|
|
Subscriptions - Volunteer Impact Account - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Better Pets and Gardens Wangara |
$213.60 |
|
|
|
Animal Care Centre Supplies - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
BioBag World Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,674.50 |
|
|
|
Biobag Dog Bags - Waste |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$63,334.50 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$1,091.71 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$10,026.45 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores / Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$572.61 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge For The City |
|
|
|
|
Capital Finance Australia Limited |
$993.76 |
|
|
|
Spin Bikes Rental - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$227.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Service For The City |
|
|
|
|
Central Regional Tafe |
$3,901.75 |
|
|
|
Training - Various Workshops - Community And Safety |
|
|
|
|
Challenge Batteries WA |
$70.40 |
|
|
|
Delkor Battery - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Civica Pty Ltd |
$953.34 |
|
|
|
BIS 7 Licence, Support & Maintenance 01.11.2020 - 31.08.2020 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$293.48 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coastal Navigation Solutions |
$132.00 |
|
|
|
Install 3 Plaques - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$775.95 |
|
|
|
Beverages For Kingsway Sports Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Aquatics Australia |
$2,078.08 |
|
|
|
Preventative Maintenance - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$16.40 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Police Check - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,181.10 |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates & Parking Signs - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Install Sign - Proposed Amendment No 173 - Strategic Land Use Planning |
|
|
|
|
Cossill & Webley Consulting Engineers |
$2,112.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - Bus Stop Hughie Edwards Drive - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Crown Lift Trucks |
$266.75 |
|
|
|
3 Monthly Service - 98482 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
DC Golf |
$95,444.90 |
|
|
|
Commission Fees - Marangaroo & Carramar Golf Club - Property Services |
|
|
|
|
Deans Auto Glass |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Install Window Tinting - 94043 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Lock & Security |
$3,939.50 |
|
|
|
Padlocks - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$904.64 |
|
|
|
Install 2 Two Way Radios - 96210 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Domus Nursery |
$602.51 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$34,094.83 |
|
|
|
Kerbing Works - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$8,666.93 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Development Cost Estimate - East Wanneroo Cell 9 - Strategic Land Use Planning |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$3,690.08 |
|
|
|
Ergonomic Assessment - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Case Management - Return To Work Monitoring - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$120,947.57 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Credit Rating Pty Ltd |
$69.30 |
|
|
|
Express Credit Check - Rico Enterprises - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd |
$458.70 |
|
|
|
Brake Clean R510 - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$4,836.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts / Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$17,236.99 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hall & Wilcox |
$18,991.50 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$568.48 |
|
|
|
Drainage Items - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,075.82 |
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Heavy Automatics |
$6,123.34 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - 96095 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$177.19 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$196.06 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$1,394.80 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
ID Consulting Pty Ltd |
$58,960.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Subscription - Profile.Id Atlas.Id Forecast.Id & Economy.Id - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Identity Perth |
$797.50 |
|
|
|
Printing - Flyer - Community Funding |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$900.90 |
|
|
|
School Holiday Program Banners & Signs - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd |
$266.20 |
|
|
|
Plant Hire - Civic Centre Foyer - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$25,052.62 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intelife Group |
$18,012.48 |
|
|
|
BBQ Cleaning For The City |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$5,038.77 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services - IM |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$2,401.91 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
JBS & G Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,836.35 |
|
|
|
Stage A Of Contaminated Sites Audit - WRC - Property |
|
|
|
|
Kinetic IT Pty Ltd |
$10,541.27 |
|
|
|
Enhanced Security Services - September 2020 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd |
$7,844.18 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$1,575.60 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Paint Spill - Brook Pass Clarkson - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Pressure Wash Kingsway Cricket Practice Nets - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Komatsu Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,979.98 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$7,030.84 |
|
|
|
Card Authentication Kit - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$735.17 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$149,081.02 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,622.63 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores / Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$5,483.84 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$559,815.30 |
|
|
|
Supply & Delivery Of 360 Litre Bills - Roll Out Of Three Bin Service - Waste |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$4,950.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation Advice - Neerabup Industrial Area - Property |
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$789.99 |
|
|
|
Audio Productions - Communications And Brand |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$7,765.42 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$577.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Play Equipment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Myzone (APAC) Pty Ltd |
$2,609.86 |
|
|
|
Fitness Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$53.36 |
|
|
|
Flasher Unit Hella - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Navman Wireless Australia Pty Ltd |
$286.00 |
|
|
|
Change GPS Form 95296 To 95702 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
NoiseNet Operations Pty Ltd |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Quality Report - Dog Barking - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$2,399.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Northern Suburbs Men's Shed Incorporated |
$212.50 |
|
|
|
Weeding Shovels - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$210.00 |
|
|
|
Brochure Stand With 4A Sign Holder - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$13,720.51 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
P & M Automotive Equipment |
$228.80 |
|
|
|
Hoist Inspections - 94015 & 94005 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$490.60 |
|
|
|
Replace Key - Koondoola Park Floodlights - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$2,021.25 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Perth Stripes & Signs |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Manufacture & Fit Graphics To Rubbish Truck - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Safer Suburbs CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$3,043.22 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Quremed Pty Ltd |
$271.04 |
|
|
|
Oxygen Servicing - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$18,799.00 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$5,972.60 |
|
|
|
Rental And Image Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$77,490.45 |
|
|
|
Road Works - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Asphalt - Depot - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
RW Quantity Surveyors |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Cost Management And Quantity Surveying Services - Leatherback Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue Equipment |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Inspection - Quinns Dog Beach - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$1,030.57 |
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$384.00 |
|
|
|
Lawn Mix & Brickies Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sealanes |
$1,576.99 |
|
|
|
Food/Beverages - Hospitality |
|
|
|
|
Shred-X |
$211.64 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$2,257.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$1,212.72 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Solution 4 Building Pty Ltd |
$37,187.50 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 12 - Shelvock Park Public Hall & Changerooms - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$450.12 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
SportsTG (SP) Pty Ltd |
$1,490.50 |
|
|
|
Licensing Renewal - FSP Manager Base - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$842.72 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - OSH |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$271.74 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$5,781.13 |
|
|
|
PPE - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$748.00 |
|
|
|
Brooms - Stores |
|
|
|
|
SW Panel & Paint |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Repair & Paint - 96123 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Tactiv Pty Ltd |
$42,240.00 |
|
|
|
Grants Management System - Year 1 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Taman Tools |
$1,155.00 |
|
|
|
Grinding Discs - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$6,468.00 |
|
|
|
Case Assistance - Long Service Leave - ICT |
|
|
|
|
The Factory (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$655.05 |
|
|
|
Christmas Decoration Storage - September - October - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$25,827.03 |
|
|
|
Swim School Certificates - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Home Pool Barrier Inspections August 2020 - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Talis Unit Trust |
$11,000.00 |
|
|
|
Asset Valuation Services - Assets |
|
|
|
|
The Workwear Group Pty Ltd |
$3,096.30 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Thirty4 Pty Ltd |
$211.20 |
|
|
|
Monthly Subscription - QNav Mobile - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$807.59 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Service Pty Ltd |
$33,036.30 |
|
|
|
Install Drink Fountain - Blackmore Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Weed Spraying - Hepburn - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Renewal Of Accessible BBQ - Foreshore Reserve - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Forestry Tubes And Trees - Hepburn - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Calming Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,155.00 |
|
|
|
Kerbing - Depot - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$4,610.10 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Carosa Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$1,306.71 |
|
|
|
Trophies - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Name Badges - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$53,419.59 |
|
|
|
Maintenance - Kingsway Cricket - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade |
$508.55 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Various Items For Operational Requirements |
|
|
|
|
Valvoline (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$4,456.95 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Lubricants - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd |
$60,913.50 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$166,133.41 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores / Fleet |
|
|
|
|
New Vehicle Purchase - FG1628 Medium Long Auto Truck $165,429.00 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Botanic Gardens |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advice And Training Rebate - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$1,347.50 |
|
|
|
Webinar Delivery - Government Tender Writing Tips 02.10.2020 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advice And Training Rebate - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$11.07 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Washing Powder - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$7,150.80 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Water Technology Pty Ltd |
$6,538.40 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Mindarie Breakwater - Parks |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$14,689.40 |
|
|
|
Turfing - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$359.15 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Service For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$11,949.98 |
|
|
|
Security Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$21,275.54 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Xercise Pro |
$3,394.50 |
|
|
|
Annual Licence Fee - 22.08.2020 - 21.08.2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003965 |
13/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$1,014.00 |
|
|
|
Offset Of Rates In Lieu Of Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Christopher Baker |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dot Newton |
$2,503.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Jacqueline Huntley |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$2,488.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda Aitken |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Paul Miles |
$2,318.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Sonet Coetzee |
$2,603.67 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$10,768.38 |
|
|
|
Monthly Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003966 |
13/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ghana Association of Western Australia Incorporated |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
|
Ghana Republic & Cultural Festival 2020 - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003967 |
15/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$17,435.00 |
|
|
|
Streetlight Installation - Hepburn Avenue/Alexander Heights - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003968 |
16/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$35,454.36 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003969 |
19/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - July 2020 $28,702.93 - Breakdown On Page 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003970 |
20/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$701,434.66 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 4 - Halesworth Park Sports Facilities - Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003971 |
20/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$7,601.66 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003972 |
20/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
AAC ID Solutions |
$1,405.06 |
|
|
|
Wristbands - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$1,735.69 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Acurix Networks Pty Ltd |
$2,013.00 |
|
|
|
Public Wi-Fi Internet - Yanchep Community Centre - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Adelphi Apparel |
$847.00 |
|
|
|
PPE - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$17,804.77 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Advanteering - Civil Engineers |
$3,446.30 |
|
|
|
Construction - Splendid Skate Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$306.24 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$210.00 |
|
|
|
Sympathy Box - C Allia - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Floral Arrangement - T & N Ariti - 60th Anniversary - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
All Australian Safety Pty Ltd |
$3,467.94 |
|
|
|
Safety Glasses - 8 Employees - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
All Class Tiling Services Pty Ltd |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Drain Installation - Aquamotion - Assets |
|
|
|
|
AMBIUS |
$174.10 |
|
|
|
Interior Plantscape Rental - Girrawheen - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$478.89 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ascon Survey And Drafting Pty Ltd |
$1,276.00 |
|
|
|
Detail Survey Extension - Spence - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Atom Supply |
$46.38 |
|
|
|
AAA Batteries - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$12,618.36 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$822.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - Butler Community Centre - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$345.24 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Bamford Consulting Ecologists |
$1,430.00 |
|
|
|
Community Workshop - Fauna Identification - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Benara Nurseries |
$19,151.25 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$165.88 |
|
|
|
Temporary Fencing - James Spiers Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bioscience Pty Ltd |
$2,618.00 |
|
|
|
Bioprime Dicot And Trace - Wanneroo - Trees & Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$1,615.06 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$2,378.87 |
|
|
|
Fuel 91 Unleaded - Wanneroo - Fleet Management |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$8,180.96 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Office Chair - Approvals |
|
|
|
|
Canon Production Printing Australia Pty Ltd |
$101.62 |
|
|
|
Scanner Charges - IM |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$966.98 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$2,691.81 |
|
|
|
Sand Yellow Brickies - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Washed White Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Central Regional Tafe |
$4,970.40 |
|
|
|
Training - Dog & Cat Management Control Course - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Training - Livestock Management & Control Course - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Centre For Pavement Engineering Education Incorporated |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Pavement Defects & Maintenance Essentials - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$2,493.84 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chillo Refrigeration & Air-Conditioning |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Walk In Fridge - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Cineads Australia |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising - Production And Services - Communications And Brand |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Aquatics Australia |
$5,223.16 |
|
|
|
Preventative Maintenance / Repairs - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$33.40 |
|
|
|
Volunteer Police Checks - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Complete Turf Supplies |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Lay Turf - Mindarie - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Cooldrive Distribution |
$1,229.02 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$24,589.84 |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sticker - Swimming Enclosure - Quinns Beach - Asset Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Richard Aldersea Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Beach Emergency Number - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$3,144.90 |
|
|
|
Fire Detection Equipment Servicing For The City |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$254.32 |
|
|
|
Oil Filter And Element Kit - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Dave Lanfear Consulting |
$1,851.30 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - 10 Year Facility Management Plan - Assets Planning |
|
|
|
|
Delnorth Pty Ltd |
$3,499.10 |
|
|
|
Steel-Flex Post Driver & Case - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Design Inspired Gifts |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advice & Training Rebate - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Diana Smith Books To Inspire |
$280.00 |
|
|
|
2 Workshops - School Holiday Program - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$35,800.99 |
|
|
|
Kerbing Works - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$51,403.75 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping, Drain Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$899.43 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$18,826.54 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items & Irrigation Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Associates |
$5,615.50 |
|
|
|
Park Master Plan & Cost Estimate - Trentham Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$85,304.56 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Credit Rating Pty Ltd |
$1,087.02 |
|
|
|
Detailed Financial Assessment - Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$1,576.11 |
|
|
|
Replace Vehicle Heat Shield Retaining Strap - Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Geared Construction Pty Ltd |
$40,760.61 |
|
|
|
Timelock Installations - Koondoola & Butterworth Parks - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$18,074.03 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Grand Toyota |
$19.67 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Remove Goal Posts - Yanchep - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Party Hire |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Stage Hire - Wanneroo Library - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$539.00 |
|
|
|
Drainage Items For The City |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,902.69 |
|
|
|
Gloves - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$787.60 |
|
|
|
Repairs - Ashdale Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$460.19 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$3,575.00 |
|
|
|
Pump Had Burnout - Bayport Park Lake - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$32,797.49 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Identity Perth |
$1,152.25 |
|
|
|
Artwork For Careerfest Flyer And Campaign - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$800.80 |
|
|
|
Printing - School Holiday Programs - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Banner - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
InSig Technologies Pty Ltd |
$3,382.50 |
|
|
|
Rental Charge - Network Coverage - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$27,444.43 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$298.93 |
|
|
|
Fire Boots - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$244.22 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$1,808.57 |
|
|
|
Pool Chemicals - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$466.20 |
|
|
|
Stock Issues - Stores |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$2,109.73 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
JDSI Consulting Engineers |
$14,364.21 |
|
|
|
Civil Consultancy Services - Butler North District Open Space - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$632.50 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$12,850.72 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$28.33 |
|
|
|
Launder Overalls - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$12,786.13 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Leamac Picture Framing |
$1,354.00 |
|
|
|
Framing - Artworks - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Leda Security Products |
$1,625.40 |
|
|
|
Bike Repair Station - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$938.28 |
|
|
|
Licence Fees - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$12,098.14 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Manheim Pty Ltd |
$139.15 |
|
|
|
Selling & Transport Vehicles - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$11,097.92 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$47,811.50 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$2,001.29 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$258,764.16 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$682.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Equipment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
MPS Architects |
$1,991.00 |
|
|
|
Upgrade - Kingsbridge Basketball - Assets |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$128.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$2,268.20 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Yellagonga Regional - Strategic Land Use Planning |
|
|
|
|
Waste Disposal - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Noma Pty Ltd |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Design Review Panel - Bouvard Walk - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Nomad Bushcraft & Wilderness Skills |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Children's Workshop - Beasts In The Bush Sessions - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$16.98 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Officeworks Superstores Pty Ltd |
$331.06 |
|
|
|
Stationery - Print Room / Waste |
|
|
|
|
On Road Auto Electrics |
$271.15 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$3,321.95 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Oracle Customer Management Solutions Pty Ltd |
$4,599.57 |
|
|
|
After Hours Calls Service - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Orbit Health & Fitness Solutions |
$1,552.95 |
|
|
|
Fitness Equipment - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$938.30 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Pavement Management Services |
$16,544.00 |
|
|
|
Road Asset Data Capturing And Condition Survey - Asset Planning |
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre |
$291.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Bus - Ashby - Community Planning & Development |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$481.25 |
|
|
|
Recover Bogged Chipper Truck - Marangaroo - Trees & Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$674.74 |
|
|
|
Plants - Parks |
|
|
|
|
PR Mattaboni & Co |
$935.00 |
|
|
|
Property Boundary Survey - Voyager - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$5,936.74 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print Smart Online Pty Ltd |
$502.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Membership Agreement Books - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$536.18 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
QLM Label Makers Pty Ltd |
$727.45 |
|
|
|
Battery/Oil Label - Ashby - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Rebel Sport |
$1,499.00 |
|
|
|
54 Inch Glass NBA Beast System - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$30,262.69 |
|
|
|
Dispose Concreted Bollards - Voyager Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Repair Fence - Bewick Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Install Posts & Chain - Bonvin Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$37,379.20 |
|
|
|
Road Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$1,589.82 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Safeway Building & Renovations Pty Ltd |
$12,056.00 |
|
|
|
Install Bottom Rail To Fence - Kingsway Aquatic Playspace - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Drains And Tiling - Aquamotion - Facility - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$1,333.20 |
|
|
|
Printing - Free Membership Flyers - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Brochures - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$48.00 |
|
|
|
Brickie Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$2,427.80 |
|
|
|
Sand Cleans - September - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$637.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Repair Paving - Teasel - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$3,660.49 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$36,174.93 |
|
|
|
Streetscapes South - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Slater-Gartrell Sports |
$319.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Netball Rings - Gumblossom Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$799.96 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$2,864.32 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$1,163.77 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies / Training Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning Supplies Pty Ltd |
$417.88 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Supplies For Depot Store |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery (Perth) Pty Ltd |
$182,576.75 |
|
|
|
Process Recyclables - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd |
$196,623.97 |
|
|
|
Tip Fees For Bulk Collection - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Dry Cleans and Laundrette |
$480.00 |
|
|
|
Laundry Of Sports Bibs - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$2,156.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting - Jo Gray - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$12,169.30 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Distributors Perth |
$200.85 |
|
|
|
Snacks & Confectionery - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
The Honda Shop |
$601.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$4,773.02 |
|
|
|
Testing/Maintenance - Kingsway Aquatic - Parks |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Talis Unit Trust |
$1,217.47 |
|
|
|
Auditor Correspondence - Wangara - Property |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For The Dell Trust |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Deposit - 1 Kombi Van - Global Beats And Eats - Events |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$14,937.89 |
|
|
|
Mulch Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
$17,500.26 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items / Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Turf |
$1,275.34 |
|
|
|
Tee Information Signs - Wanneroo - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$6,317.30 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$1,464.10 |
|
|
|
Plaque - Shelvock Sports Amenities Building - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Plaque - Landsdale Skate Park - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Name Badges - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
|
Cricket Mats Removed - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ungerboeck Systems International Pty Ltd |
$12,210.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Licence Fee 01.09.2020 - 30.06.2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
United Fasteners WA Pty Ltd |
$34.68 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vermeer (WA & NT) |
$5,903.93 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Vocus Communications |
$247.50 |
|
|
|
NBN Connection - YTRAC - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$500.35 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$121.60 |
|
|
|
Alice Spine Labels - Wanneroo - Librarian |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company |
$10,934.34 |
|
|
|
Supply Bitumen Stabilised Limestone - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Crushed Limestone - Gnangara Road Footpath - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Crushed Limestone - Franklin / Rousset Roads - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$95.12 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Catering Items - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$1,665.51 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Shade Pty Ltd |
$7,183.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Shade Sails - Sheldwich Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Winter Maintenance - Shade Sails - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$17,186.05 |
|
|
|
Transport And Processing Of Green Waste - Waste |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Probity Adviser Services - Wanneroo - Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$42,924.01 |
|
|
|
Security Services - Community Safety/Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$765.60 |
|
|
|
Watering - Ocean Reef Road Rehabilitation - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Zenien |
$165.00 |
|
|
|
IT Consulting - Girrawheen Hub - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Zetta Group |
$11,256.63 |
|
|
|
Network Managed Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Zipform Pty Ltd |
$2,655.40 |
|
|
|
Print And Issue 2020 / 2021 Final Notices - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003973 |
20/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Art en Soul |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advice & Training Rebate - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Ashmy Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$2,299.91 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City - September 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$184.20 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$671.40 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$18,906.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Ben Trager Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Blueprint Homes (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Celebration Homes Pty Ltd |
$12,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 6 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$1,524.40 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,080.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$688.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$380.30 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - 01 - 30.09.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$110,349.80 |
|
|
|
2020 / 2021 Emergency Services Levy |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Network |
$1,617.90 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging For 13.10.2020 |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$622.90 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Home Group WA Pty Ltd |
$12,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 6 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$12,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 6 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
IPAA WA |
$58.00 |
|
|
|
Registration - 2020 WA Budget Briefing - 1 Attendee - Corporate Services |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$5,044.98 |
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations - Rates |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$262.45 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
LGISWA |
$302,743.48 |
|
|
|
Insurance - Property Instalment 2 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance - Liability - 30.06.2020 - 30.06.2021 |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,629.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Materon Investments WA Pty Ltd |
$6,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 3 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$8,420.75 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Miss Tamara Blum |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$904.33 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$958.34 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$154.02 |
|
|
|
Mr Stephen Logan |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$536.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$442.56 |
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,853.49 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Simsai Construction Group Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$7,934.17 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
SSB Pty Ltd |
$4,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd (Atf The Summit Homes Group Trust) |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$16,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 8 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$2,489.52 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003974 |
27/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Communities |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
2020 Auscontact Award Tickets - 14.11.2020 - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Gary Martin |
$8,800.00 |
|
|
|
CEO Performance Review 2020 |
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$20,261.96 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 19 - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003975 |
27/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$12,848.30 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003976 |
27/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$232.15 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$1,117,188.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Brighton Community Garden & Resource Centre Incorporated |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Funding - 3 Workshops - Engaging People With Disabilities In The Garden March - May - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction Industry Training Board |
$41,088.13 |
|
|
|
Collection Approved Levy Payments September 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Home Group WA Pty Ltd |
$4,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
LD & D Australia Pty Ltd |
$367.05 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Materon Investments WA Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Domenic Crisona |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$4,901.91 |
|
|
|
Mrs Carol Schoen |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$87.95 |
|
|
|
Mrs Katherine Holl |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Marie Pudelek |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Tamsyn Haylott |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Residential Building WA Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
SSB Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$14,018.31 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003977 |
27/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$1,842.72 |
|
|
|
Replay Paving - Ariti / Frederick - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$23,728.48 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Airlite Cleaning |
$236.35 |
|
|
|
Office Cleaning - YTRAC - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Ausfleet Software |
$11,220.00 |
|
|
|
Ausfleet Software Modules - ICT |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$1,691.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Workshop / Stores |
|
|
|
|
B Waddell Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd |
$770.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Inspection & Report Regarding Adequacy Of The Roof At WLCC - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Bee Advice |
$320.00 |
|
|
|
Remove Bee Swarm - Scenic Drive Park & Damperia Park |
|
|
|
|
Better Pets and Gardens Wangara |
$177.83 |
|
|
|
Animal Care Centre Supplies - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Bollig Design Group Ltd |
$2,310.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Kingsway Olympic Sports Clubrooms - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group Ltd |
$461.34 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Mullins Way Yanchep - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Borrell Rafferty Associates Pty Ltd |
$3,685.00 |
|
|
|
Cost Management - Butler North District Open Space Project - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$12,284.48 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$30,527.20 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec |
$170.50 |
|
|
|
Desk Storage - Deluxe Mobile Pedestal Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Business Growth AU |
$2,640.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Canon Production Printing Australia Pty Ltd |
$428.80 |
|
|
|
Scanner Charges - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Capricorn Village Joint Venture |
$98,555.56 |
|
|
|
Contribution 2020 - Jindee Marmion Avenue - Strategic Planning |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$1,164.90 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Servicing - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd |
$11,007.70 |
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Carpark Seawall Assessment - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$6,564.16 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$24,172.73 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$2,816.09 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Clayton Utz |
$41,810.62 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$1,254.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$2,173.60 |
|
|
|
Maintenance / Service Fire Detection Equipment - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
DMB Fluid Technologies Pty Ltd |
$2,395.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$4,292.01 |
|
|
|
Asset Renewal Program - Pineview Place - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$4,845.50 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping / Drain Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Services - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Dual Autos Pty Ltd |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts / Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$182.28 |
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
ECO Environmental Holdings Pty Ltd |
$126.50 |
|
|
|
Multi-Parameter Meter - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Eco-Growth International Pty Ltd |
$1,507.99 |
|
|
|
Fertiliser - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Ellenby Tree Farms |
$473.00 |
|
|
|
Planting - Ashdale - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$1,331.55 |
|
|
|
Irrigation Modifications Design - Aquamotion - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Install Reticulation - Hartman Drive - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$23,320.00 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Credit Rating Pty Ltd |
$69.30 |
|
|
|
Express Credit Check - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Workforce Solutions Pty Limited |
$46.20 |
|
|
|
Australian Criminal History Check - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Feral Invasive Species Eradication |
$1,520.00 |
|
|
|
Fox Control - Yellagonga Regional Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Revision - Kingsbridge Basketball - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$1,936.67 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts / Repairs - Fleet / Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$40,698.97 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$451.00 |
|
|
|
Grass Tree Watering - Hardcastle Park - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Green Options Pty Ltd |
$4,041.29 |
|
|
|
Rotary Mowing / Apply Fertiliser - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$2,662.00 |
|
|
|
Removal Of AFL Goals - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Griffiths Architects |
$660.00 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Design Review Panel - Approvals |
|
|
|
|
Hall & Wilcox |
$14,960.00 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$1,357.40 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$333.83 |
|
|
|
Gloves - Stores |
|
|
|
|
HopgoodGanim |
$7,156.60 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$1,544.75 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Humes Concrete Products |
$8,193.25 |
|
|
|
Well Liner - Caporn / Franklin - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$45,900.80 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$16,546.20 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Identity Perth |
$71.50 |
|
|
|
Additional Work For Facebook Post - Careerfest - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$25,378.54 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Interfire Agencies Pty Ltd |
$221.10 |
|
|
|
Stickers - Reflective Helmet Name Tag - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$344.99 |
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Jadu Software Pty Ltd |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Additional Disk Space - ICT |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$834.96 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$2,488.20 |
|
|
|
Roundabout Kerbing - Hepburn / Highclere - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$829.08 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$9,340.73 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$33.99 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$198,119.10 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Leamac Picture Framing |
$1,144.00 |
|
|
|
Framing And Plaques - 8 Aboriginal Prints - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking WA Pty Ltd |
$9,225.45 |
|
|
|
Linemarking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$366.16 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$3,767.50 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
|
Market Valuation - Ghost Gum - Property |
|
|
|
|
Medihire & Sales |
$570.00 |
|
|
|
Service - Yanchep Sandcruiser Beach Wheelchair - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$2,068.00 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$330,371.05 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$704.00 |
|
|
|
Flying Fox Cable - Huntington - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mowmaster Turf Equipment |
$1,160.50 |
|
|
|
Edger Blades - Stores |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$252.67 |
|
|
|
Consumables - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$6,316.29 |
|
|
|
Maintenance Works - Beach Access Way - Two Rocks |
|
|
|
|
Naval Association of Australia Western Australian Section |
$2,966.90 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Remembrance Day Service - 11.11.2020 - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Nespresso Professional |
$86.00 |
|
|
|
Cappuccinattore Kit 100 Straw Nozzle - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
NoiseNet Operations Pty Ltd |
$1,188.00 |
|
|
|
Dashboard Noise Monitor Hire - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$3,196.30 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Stock - Store Issues |
|
|
|
|
Brushcutter & Pole Saw - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Novus Autoglass |
$132.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Windscreen - 95488 - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ognenis Surveying Trust |
$3,410.00 |
|
|
|
Survey - Feature & Contour - Hainsworth Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Survey - Feature & Contour - Luisini Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$4,382.93 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$13,014.00 |
|
|
|
Various Arborist Reports - Assets / Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$407.00 |
|
|
|
Locking Services - Paloma Skate Park Lighting Box - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Perth City Farm Incorporated |
$9,647.44 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Development Of Sustainable Girrawheen Hub Community Garden - Community Planning |
|
|
|
|
Perth Energy Pty Ltd |
$130,561.05 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Perth Progressive Supplies |
$2,944.66 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Poolegrave Signs & Engraving |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Install Signs - Kingsway Soccer - Assets |
|
|
|
|
PR Mattaboni & Co |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Survey Fenceline - Newman Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$7,155.15 |
|
|
|
Alarm / CCTV Services - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Pritchard Francis Consulting Pty Ltd |
$3,998.81 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Yanchep Lagoon Infrastructure Strategy - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Prodesign Lighting Pty Ltd |
$765.60 |
|
|
|
Repairs - Lights - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$1,898.38 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Provet Pty Ltd |
$943.71 |
|
|
|
Backhome Mini Microchips - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Callout - WN 33486 - Flat Battery |
|
|
|
|
Randal |
$115.50 |
|
|
|
Financial Review For 2020 - Office Of The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing |
$24,794.00 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Rolsteel Enterprises Pty Ltd |
$8,745.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Royal Wolf Trading Australia Pty Ltd |
$600.58 |
|
|
|
6 Month Cabin Hire - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
RSEA Pty Ltd |
$409.20 |
|
|
|
Safety Equipment - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Rubek Automatic Doors |
$242.00 |
|
|
|
Service Doors - New Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Safety Tactile Pave |
$2,210.21 |
|
|
|
Replace White Tactile Pavers - Connolly Drive - Engineering Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Safety World |
$207.90 |
|
|
|
SDS Station & Binder - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$8,784.60 |
|
|
|
Printing - Dog & Cat Mailout - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$24.00 |
|
|
|
Landscape Soils And Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$1,339.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) Pty Ltd |
$7,066.40 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$1,527.05 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$640.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia Ltd |
$36.75 |
|
|
|
Training - CPR Refresher - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$73.65 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$6.02 |
|
|
|
PPE - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd |
$6,014.91 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Refuse - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$3,234.00 |
|
|
|
Long Service Leave Configuration - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$13,197.25 |
|
|
|
Locating Underground Services - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$16,305.65 |
|
|
|
Home Pool Barrier Inspections - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Training - Resuscitation Techniques - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for New Dealership Trust |
$154.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Think Promotional |
$1,711.60 |
|
|
|
Promotional Merchandise - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$7,543.14 |
|
|
|
Mulch Supply - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$237.16 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Town Team Movement Limited |
$2,816.00 |
|
|
|
Action Plan Proposal - Wanneroo Town Centre - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$9,069.50 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$139.00 |
|
|
|
Custom Gold Picture Frame - Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$206,340.02 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks Volunteer Bush Fire Brigade |
$179.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Speakerphone - Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
Ungerboeck Systems International Pty Ltd |
$8,514.00 |
|
|
|
Consultant Engagement - 26.10.2020 - 30.10.2020 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
United Fasteners WA Pty Ltd |
$65.08 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Valvoline (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$385.86 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Oil - Stores |
|
|
|
|
WA Library Supplies |
$253.90 |
|
|
|
Shelving Post - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Company |
$848.46 |
|
|
|
Crushed Limestone - Franklin / Rousset - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo & Northern Suburbs Community Garden Incorporated |
$4,992.26 |
|
|
|
Busy Bee Workshop Grant - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$5,667.33 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Shade Pty Ltd |
$495.00 |
|
|
|
Shade Sail Repairs & Maintenance - Donatello Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$10,150.20 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Westbooks |
$215.78 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$585.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Local Government & Conflicts Of Interest - Cr Cvitan |
|
|
|
|
Training - Understanding Financial Reports & Budgets - Cr Parker |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,208.16 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Annual Internal Audit Plan |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$3,788.86 |
|
|
|
Security Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Winc Australia Pty Limited |
$6,744.11 |
|
|
|
Stationery Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$2,415.05 |
|
|
|
Weed Control - Neerabup - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Zetta Group |
$51,396.86 |
|
|
|
Monthly Managed Service Fee - ICT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003978 |
30/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Istream Automation |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Install Hand Sanitiser Machine - Enterprise House - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003979 |
30/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - August 2020 $39,550.14 Breakdown On Page 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003980 |
30/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Credit Card & Bank Fees - September 2020 $88,669.86 Breakdown On Page 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFTs |
$13,977,074.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK |
|||
|
00003969 |
19/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank |
|
|
|
|
Flexipurchase - July 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Credit Adjustment Cd Adjustment (S) |
-$2,211.25 |
|
|
|
BCF Butler - Water Bottles |
$75.98 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$524.77 |
|
|
|
Landsdale Plants - Plants - Rosslare Park |
$225.00 |
|
|
|
Lullfitz Nursery - Plants - Rosslare Park |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Stationery Items |
$462.00 |
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment - Spraying Equipment |
$408.94 |
|
|
|
Commando Coffee - Coffee - Volunteers At Yanchep |
$53.50 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Batteries - Camera Traps |
$162.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Lock Key - Knob And Lever |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Alspec - Paint Supplies |
$41.02 |
|
|
|
Australian Warning Signs - Arrow Board Led |
$467.50 |
|
|
|
Auto Pro Joondalup - Two Way Radios M13 |
$179.00 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$5,068.23 |
|
|
|
Calidad Industries - Diffuser - Clear Prismatic |
$264.00 |
|
|
|
Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd - Hire - Parts Washer - March & May 2020 |
$838.26 |
|
|
|
Coles - Sunscreen |
$60.15 |
|
|
|
Coles Express - Diesel Fuel - Flocon Truck 96208 |
$197.56 |
|
|
|
Dasco Supply Group - Inserts For Arrow Board |
$181.39 |
|
|
|
Fielders - Custom Flashing |
$922.61 |
|
|
|
Karville Pty Ltd - Parts Washers - Workshop |
$1,983.74 |
|
|
|
LTV Wangara - Tool Purchases |
$136.91 |
|
|
|
Nappy Express Hire Service - Launder Workshop Uniforms. |
$950.46 |
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower Services - Tool Purchases |
$224.07 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Stationery Items |
$124.90 |
|
|
|
Osborne Ceramic - Grigio Lusema Tiles |
$26.40 |
|
|
|
Pacific Hydraulics - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$72.73 |
|
|
|
Pattos Paint Shop - Paint Suppiles |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Permatech - Concrete / Drainage Adhesive |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
RSEA Pty Ltd - Joondalup - Gloves |
$199.50 |
|
|
|
Statewide Cleaning - Toilet Tissue Dispenser |
$259.33 |
|
|
|
Super Cheap Auto - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$96.98 |
|
|
|
Valspar Joondalup - Paint Supplies |
$1,051.21 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering - Food For The Party |
$99.50 |
|
|
|
Work Clobber - Safety Boots |
$479.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Manager Aquamotion & Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Credit Adjustment - Fraudulent Transaction |
-$54.20 |
|
|
|
Big - Microwave Oven |
$48.00 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Advertising Services |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
RLSSWA - Swim School Resus, Swim Teacher & Bronze Medallion Award Fees |
$257.40 |
|
|
|
Theraquatics - Group Fitness Equipment |
$168.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community & Place |
|
|
|
|
Coles - Sausage Sizzle Week - Clarkson Youth Centre |
$15.55 |
|
|
|
Evertopinve - Sports Day - July School Holiday Program |
$88.00 |
|
|
|
Youth Affairs Council Of WA - Membership |
$275.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Food For July School Holiday Program |
$48.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Items - Program Events |
$60.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Caltex Ashby - Ice - School Holiday Programs |
$4.20 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Items - Program Activities |
$267.85 |
|
|
|
J.D. Penangke - Cancellation Fee |
$280.20 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Canvas - Program Activities |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Frames - Youth Leadership Forums |
$171.00 |
|
|
|
Australia Post Wanneroo - Application For Working With Children's Check |
$87.00 |
|
|
|
Riot Art & Craft - Clay And Paint - Program Activities |
$67.28 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Materials - Program Activities |
$13.50 |
|
|
|
wwc-Communities - Working With Children's Check Renewal |
$87.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
Apple Online Au - Retirement Gift - Senior Ranger |
$999.00 |
|
|
|
BP Carnarvon Opt - Fuel For City Vehicle |
$39.45 |
|
|
|
Caltex - Fuel For City Vehicle |
$117.66 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Diaries And Certificate Frames For EMC |
$233.18 |
|
|
|
Officeworks Online - Retirement Gift - Senior Ranger |
$106.00 |
|
|
|
Puma Roadhouse - Fuel For City Vehicle |
$76.74 |
|
|
|
Subway Yanchep - Catering For BFS Course At Two Rocks BFB |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Wooramel Roadhouse - Fuel For City Vehicle |
$65.30 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering - BFS Course At Two Rocks BFB |
$103.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Aldi Stores - Catering Items - In House Catering Requests |
$62.04 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering Items - In House Catering Requests |
$515.38 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - Catering Items - In House Catering Requests |
$177.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Amazon Prime Membership - Refund Membership Cancelled |
-$6.99 |
|
|
|
Bookdepository.Com - Local Stock Purchase |
$30.64 |
|
|
|
CPP State Library - Parking Fees |
$12.12 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Storage Containers - Store Room |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
News Limited - Australian Newspaper Subscription |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Self Adhesive Velcro Hook & Loop |
$22.99 |
|
|
|
Plym Rocket - Subscription - Kitkeeper |
$948.83 |
|
|
|
Priceless Wanneroo - Marking Tape |
$3.00 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Water Refills |
$59.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer & Information Services |
|
|
|
|
Adobe PS Creative Cloud - Subscription - Creative Cloud Photoshop |
45.99 |
|
|
|
Google Cloud - Google Cloud Search Monthly Fee And Map API - July 2020 |
$92.71 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 1 Startech Dual Bay 5.25" Trayless Hot Swap Mobile Rack |
$86.05 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 2 Samsung Tab A 10.1 Tough Cases |
$30.38 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 40 Alogic Cat6 1M Network Cable Black |
$172.17 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 100 Samsung S20 Tough Cases |
$717.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - 8 Flexii Gravity Pirate Rugged Case For Tab S6 Lite 10.4 |
$607.62 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Zoom Standard Pro Monthly - Quantity: 10 |
$230.89 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Dell 16gb 2Rx4 Pc4-2133P-R Ddr4-2133Mhz - Mem Module |
$364.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, Communications and Events |
|
|
|
|
Campaignmonitor.Co - Enewsletter |
$2,140.41 |
|
|
|
Entire IT Australia Pty Ltd - Adobe Licencing Subscription |
$1,391.94 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Advertising |
$511.47 |
|
|
|
Freshworks Incorporated - Commjobs Ticketing System |
$380.49 |
|
|
|
Parks And Leisure Australia - Attend WA 2020 Awards Of Excellence |
$181.50 |
|
|
|
Subway Wanneroo - Catering - Lunch Time Meeting |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Wanewsadv - Death Notice - F Antulov |
$102.20 |
|
|
|
Yumpupublishing - Facebook Advertising |
$36.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parks & Conservation Management |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$451.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Surveymonkey - Subscription |
$541.58 |
|
|
|
Kmart - I-reward Vouchers |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic & Transport Services |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$46.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste Management |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$63.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$28,702.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00003979 |
30/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Australia Bank - Flexipurchase - August 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Arborwest Tree Farm - Replacement Jacaranda |
$132.00 |
|
|
|
Couplers Malaga - Hydraulic Fittings - Irrigation Pump Headworks |
$142.94 |
|
|
|
Landsdale Plants - Plant - Snow Maiden |
$706.50 |
|
|
|
Lindan Pty Ltd - Reflective Tape |
$15.40 |
|
|
|
Mirco - Fertiliser & Tree-Ties |
$461.95 |
|
|
|
Plantrite - Plants |
$989.60 |
|
|
|
Richgro Garden - Landscape Mix |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$327.38 |
|
|
|
Boya Equipment - Backpack Sprayers |
$440.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Action Lockservice - Cut Key To Code |
$170.00 |
|
|
|
Barnetts Architectural Hardware - Hardware Purchases |
$658.76 |
|
|
|
Beyond Tools - Grinder |
$478.00 |
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$23.90 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$6,932.69 |
|
|
|
Caltex Yanchep - Petrol - Small Plant 98439 |
$11.05 |
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks WA - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$12.96 |
|
|
|
Direct Fasteners - Screws |
$327.75 |
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation - Sprinklers Works - Beamarks Road |
$36.30 |
|
|
|
Fielders - Custom Flashing |
$150.61 |
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd - Copper Spray Paint |
$91.89 |
|
|
|
Geodetic Supply & Repair - Crack Monitor Gauge |
$260.00 |
|
|
|
Jaycar - Tablet Chargers |
$143.50 |
|
|
|
Mindarie Carwash - Personal Purchase Made In Error - Repaid |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Nappy Express - Uniform Laundering - Fleet |
$1,459.54 |
|
|
|
Pattos Paint Shop - Paint Supplies |
$74.60 |
|
|
|
Productive Plastics - Clear Acrylic Sheet & Diffuser |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Wangara - Diamond Blades |
$770.00 |
|
|
|
Toolmart Australia Pty Ltd - F-Clamps |
$77.85 |
|
|
|
Valspar - Paint Supplies |
$944.59 |
|
|
|
Water Wise Water Truck - Vehicle Spare Parts |
$374.73 |
|
|
|
Work Clobber - PPE Purchases |
$375.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Manager Aquamotion & Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
7 Eleven - Bags Of Ice |
$10.00 |
|
|
|
Austswim Limited - Austswim Recognised Swim Centre |
$230.00 |
|
|
|
Big W - Batteries |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
Coles - Swim Nappies And Creche Wipes |
$40.50 |
|
|
|
Poolshop Online - Hand Sanitiser |
$211.76 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Advertising |
$55.93 |
|
|
|
Pars Rugs - Rug For Crèche |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
RLSSWA - Swim Teacher Rescue Award |
$19.80 |
|
|
|
Southland Supply Group - First Aid - Emergency Response Caps |
$418.00 |
|
|
|
Medshop-Australia - Laerdal Pocket Mask |
$390.50 |
|
|
|
Epic Catering Services - Sales Training Catering |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community & Place |
|
|
|
|
Coles - Catering & Cleaning Supplies |
$51.31 |
|
|
|
Good Samaritan Industries - R n B Fridays Live Board Game |
$5.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering Supplies |
$32.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Coles - Catering & Cleaning Items |
$114.43 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Materials - R U Ok Day Activities |
$508.19 |
|
|
|
Australian Association For Infant Mental Health - Membership Renewal |
$110.00 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Giant Games For Outreach |
$504.00 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering Items |
$51.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Safety & Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
DPRID - Agriculture - Licence - Own A Brand For The Holding And Conveyance Of Livestock |
$76.50 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Shelving For Fire Station |
$428.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Aldi Stores - In House Catering Requests |
$40.39 |
|
|
|
Coles - In House Catering Requests, Dishwashing Tablets - Staff Rooms & Water, Nuts And Soft Drinks - Council Members |
$1,036.46 |
|
|
|
Liquorland - Wine - MRC Meeting & Beverages - Council Members Area |
$137.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Bakery - In House Catering Requests |
$18.90 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fresh - In House Catering Requests |
$231.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
Aldi Stores - Catering - Program Activities |
$4.39 |
|
|
|
Booktopia Pty Ltd - Book Purchases |
$74.85 |
|
|
|
Bunnings Group Ltd - Moisture Absorber |
$86.00 |
|
|
|
Business Base - Laminator - Clarkson Library |
$312.05 |
|
|
|
City Of Fremantle - Promotion Support - Librarycraft |
$100.50 |
|
|
|
Coles - Catering - Program Activities |
$120.20 |
|
|
|
Dymocks - Book Club Kit |
$339.89 |
|
|
|
Educational Art Supplies - Early Learning Resources |
$272.09 |
|
|
|
Kmart - Resources - Program Activities |
$83.25 |
|
|
|
Lams Oriental Supermarket - Catering - Girrawheen Hub Hirers & User Groups Meeting |
$28.18 |
|
|
|
Mhamad Mnahy - Catering - Girrawheen Hub Hirers & User Groups Meeting |
$13.00 |
|
|
|
Modern Teaching Aids - Pegs - Peg Doll Activity |
$126.39 |
|
|
|
Museums Australia - Association Membership |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
News Limited - Australian Newspaper Subscription |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Officeworks - Office Suite For Edutouch Smartboard |
$188.00 |
|
|
|
Quan An 3 Mien - Catering - Girrawheen Hub Hirers & User Groups Meeting - 4 August 2020 |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
The Good Guys -Fridge - WLCC Meeting Room |
$348.00 |
|
|
|
Thingz Gifts - Program Materials |
$11.49 |
|
|
|
Two Rocks IGA - Purchase Of Water Refills |
$59.75 |
|
|
|
Woolworths - Catering - Fiona Palmer Event |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer & Information Services |
|
|
|
|
Adobe PS Creative Cloud - Creative Cloud Photoshop Subscription |
$45.99 |
|
|
|
Google Cloud - Search Monthly Fee And Map API |
$84.27 |
|
|
|
J2 Efax Plus Services - Annual Subscription |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Netregistry - Renewal Of Discoverwanneroo.Com.Au |
$46.95 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Charge Name: Zoom Standard Pro Monthly - Quantity: 10 |
$230.89 |
|
|
|
Paypal - Quietpoint Active Noise - Cancelling Bluetooth Headset - Wireless Mobile Mouse - External USB DVD Writer |
$221.00 |
|
|
|
Rastogi Holdings Pty Ltd - Thermal Receipt Printers |
$4,359.00 |
|
|
|
Westpac Greythorn - Sidra Solutions |
$1,738.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, Communications and Events |
|
|
|
|
Campaignmonitor - Enewsletter |
$2,053.80 |
|
|
|
Ergolink - Document Holder And Office Chair |
$552.95 |
|
|
|
Facebook - Advertising |
$1,895.61 |
|
|
|
Freshworks Incorporated - Helpdesk System |
$375.85 |
|
|
|
Spotify - Advertising |
$456.19 |
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital - East Keys Coreflutes |
$71.50 |
|
|
|
Wanewsadv - Death Notice - F Antulov |
$93.85 |
|
|
|
Yumpupublishing - Create Online Publication Of The City's PDF - What's Happening And Wanneroo Link |
$35.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parks & Conservation Management |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$80.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Ahri Ltd - Membership Renewal |
$735.00 |
|
|
|
Australia Post Wanneroo - Registered Mail |
$7.60 |
|
|
|
Lazesoft - Recovery Suite Pro |
$44.95 |
|
|
|
Gumnut Family - Medical Fees |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Services |
|
|
|
|
ASIC - Company Search |
$17.00 |
|
|
|
City Of Perth Parking - Parking Fees |
$2.52 |
|
|
|
Australia Post Wanneroo - Postage Charges |
$5.40 |
|
|
|
The Piddington Society Incorporated - Registration - Environmental Law: Are We In An Era Of Reform 08.10.2020 |
$35.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic & Transport Services |
|
|
|
|
Totally Workwear - PPE |
$469.35 |
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchases |
$18.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste Management |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings - Hardware Purchses |
$341.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$39,550.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - National Australia Bank |
$68,253.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - National Australia Bank & EFT's |
$14,045,327.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
|
116910 |
05.06.2019 |
Rebecca Beech |
-$100.00 |
|
116950 |
05.06.2019 |
Gortankaku Community Association WA Incorporated |
-$540.00 |
|
117026 |
18.06.2019 |
Kara McAllan |
-$100.00 |
|
117050 |
18.06.2019 |
Mr Mathew Cole |
-$374.79 |
|
117053 |
18.06.2019 |
Danielle Earle - Yoga |
-$0.60 |
|
117097 |
25.06.2019 |
Settlements by Jo Harman Pty Ltd |
-$73.10 |
|
117101 |
25.06.2019 |
Nimba Citizen Association |
-$2.00 |
|
117104 |
25.06.2019 |
Broadwater Builds |
-$157.80 |
|
117106 |
25.06.2019 |
Chelsea Fimognari |
-$0.75 |
|
117109 |
25.06.2019 |
Georgia McEwan |
-$10.00 |
|
117111 |
25.06.2019 |
Megan Dixon |
-$25.00 |
|
117188 |
02.07.2019 |
Tanita Deprazer |
-$150.00 |
|
117207 |
02.07.2019 |
Louisa Jane Holdings Pty Ltd |
-$330.00 |
|
120133 |
22.09.2020 |
Mr Paul Kelly & Mrs Peta Kelly |
-$536.00 |
|
119618 |
01.04.2020 |
Get Home Safe Limited |
-$371.03 |
|
119639 |
19.05.2020 |
Get Home Safe Limited |
-$371.03 |
|
119752 |
23.06.2020 |
Get Home Safe Limited |
-$371.03 |
|
120008 |
01.09.2020 |
Catholic Primary School Sports Association |
-$350.00 |
|
120097 |
22.09.2020 |
Istream Automation |
-$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
-$4,952.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANUAL JOURNAL |
|||
|
11902/21 |
29/10/2020 |
Lodgement Fee 29.10.2020 32 Unpaid Infringements |
$2,464.00 |
|
11886/21 |
22/10/2020 |
Lodgement Fee 19.10.2020 26 Unpaid Infringements |
$2,002.00 |
|
11865/21 |
13/10/2020 |
Lodgement Fee 09.10.2020 23 Unpaid Infringements |
$1,771.00 |
|
11865/21 |
13/10/2020 |
Returned Creditor Reject Bank Fees 06.10.2020 |
$2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$6,239.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 1 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Audit WA PO281013 |
$2,830.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell2 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$3,779.77 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 8.6hours |
$1,203.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 3 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$4,185.88 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 8.6hours |
$98.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory legal fees 185 Mary Street |
$21,975.21 |
|
|
|
Hopgoodganim legal fees 1 & 8 Wanneroo Road |
$6,506.00 |
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$4,372.12 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 17.85hours |
$2,499.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$2,659.48 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 25.97hours |
$3,635.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 6 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$4,663.40 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 25.97hours |
$2,989.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 7 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$3,996.83 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 16.67hours |
$2,333.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$2,610.47 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 14.10hours |
$1,973.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 9 |
|
|
|
|
William Buck PO 274903 |
$4,180.27 |
|
|
|
William Buck Invoice 3778 - 2nd Internal transactional review - 29.88hours |
$4,183.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$80,676.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL FUND BANK ACCOUNT |
|||
|
|
|
Payroll Payments - October 2020 |
|
|
|
|
06.10.2020 |
$1,730,573.26 |
|
|
|
06.10.2020 |
$10,759.82 |
|
|
|
20.10.2020 |
$34,032.03 |
|
|
|
20.10.2020 |
$5,630.21 |
|
|
|
20.10.2020 |
$1,728,206.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$3,509,201.80 |
|
00003980 |
30/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees - September 2020 |
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$62,081.15 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fee Debtors |
$38.02 |
|
|
|
Bpay Fee Rates |
$21,517.59 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Debtors |
$1.87 |
|
|
|
Bpoint Rates |
$1,294.52 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$321.27 |
|
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$388.60 |
|
|
|
Establishment Fee |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$85,748.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card - September 2020 |
|
|
|
|
H Singh |
|
|
|
|
Western Power - Stay Pole Relocation - Hudson Avenue |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
Western Power - HV Pole Relocation - Wade Court |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
Western Power - HV Pole Relocation - Patrick Court |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
Virtual Waste & Recycle Conference 2020 - 25.09.2020 |
$201.98 |
|
|
|
Western Power - Install / Modify Streetlight - Rawlinson Drive |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Dickson |
|
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$12.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Jennings |
|
|
|
|
Sunnyside Up - Sayvers Food In Leederville - Business Hospitality |
$22.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms |
|
|
|
|
Business News Pty Ltd - Registration - Business News Success & Leadership With Peter Coleman 22.09.2020 - 2 Attendees |
$260.00 |
|
|
|
Swell Mullaloo - Business Hospitality - Lunch With Executive Of The City Of Joondalup 04.09.2020 |
$209.25 |
|
|
|
Kingsway Bar & Bistro - Business Hospitality - Lunch & Presentation For Outgoing Councillors - 18.09.2020 |
$182.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$14.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Smart |
|
|
|
|
Mailchimp - Subscription - Wanneroo Wrap |
$28.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$2,921.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees And Credit Cards |
$88,669.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoup to Director Corporate Services Advance A/C |
$14,154,739.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payments Total (Includes Payroll, Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$17,752,611.27 |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 386
Property Services
3.18 Response to Petition PT01-09/20 - Opposing any Expansion of the Former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Site at Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie
File Ref: 22542V08 – 20/454131
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council to consider a petition opposing any expansion to the development footprint of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park site at Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie.
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 (PT01-09/20), Council received a Petition signed by 1,148 residents, which reads as follows:
“We are opposed to any expansion to the development footprint of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park site at Lot 211 Quinns Road Mindarie which will encroach on Bush Forever site #397.”
Refer to Attachment 1 for a plan of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie (Lot 211), which is an 11.042 ha site owned in freehold by the City and incorporating:
· The site of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park;
· The Quinns Mindarie Surf Life Saving Club and Portofino’s Restaurant (both leased from the City);
· Public car parking areas are adjacent to Quinns Road; and
· Natural coastal heath.
The Bush Forever status has been applied over the whole of Lot 211, including the leased sites, the former caravan park and the car parks.
Detail
Business Case
The petition was submitted at the same Ordinary Council Meeting as an Administration report to consider a Business Case for the re-development of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park (CS03-09/20). Detailed information regarding Lot 211, the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park and the history of the project was provided in the report.
Following consideration of the report at the Ordinary Council Meeting, Council resolved as follows:
“That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Redevelopment Business Case (August 2020) prepared by Pracsys (Attachment 3);
2. AUTHORISES Administration, in consultation with Pracsys and Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Re-Development Working Group, to:
a) Develop and conduct an Expression of Interest process for market-based interest from third party operators, of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park site (as a modern caravan or holiday park) under a commercial ground lease, noting that:
i. The Expression of Interest will invite submissions on one or both of the following alternatives:
a. The original footprint of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park; and
b. The original footprint plus an expansion in accordance with item 2.a)ii) below;
ii. Any expansion to the development footprint of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park site will be to the extent reasonably required for the commercial viability of a development, while preserving the environmental value the majority of natural vegetation at Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie (noting that the preservation of the environmental value will be an important criterion in the Expression of Interest process); and
iii. The outcomes of the Expression of Interest process, including any recommended lessee/ operator and development footprint will be the subject of a subsequent report to Council; and
b) Investigate and report to Council on options to preserve and enhance the environmental value of those portions of Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie which are not required for the redevelopment of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park; and
3. NOTES that Administration, in parallel to the Expression of Interest process described in Recommendation 2 above, will:
a) Undertake further community engagement in conjunction with the Expression of Interest process, including site specifications and design elements, with that community engagement to include:
i. Providing information sessions for participants in the community workshops (and other interested parties) to convey further details on the Expression of Interest process; and
ii. Investigation of a reference group (or groups) or an Advisory Group (or Advisory Groups), representing local, environmental/ heritage and business/ tourism interests, to inform the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Re-Development Working Group on the development of the Expression of Interest documentation; and
b) Engage with the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage in relation to the land tenure of the road reserve area bounded by Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie.”
Site Condition
The report to the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 noted that the site of the former caravan park on Lot 211 had suffered from anti-social behaviour, which included the depositing of drug-use paraphernalia and other waste. Administration is attending to the cleaning of this area, with works expected to occur in late 2020. Due to some of the waste being deposited in long grass, mechanical collection may be necessary to ensure worker safety. Following the clean-up, Administration will continue to monitor and attend to further cleaning as required. No site cleaning will occur outside the boundary of the former caravan park.
Community Consultation
The preparation of the Business Case was informed by a community and industry engagement process, progressed between late 2018 and early 2020. This included:
· Community workshops in late 2018;
· Industry consultation during mid-2019; and
· A survey seeking broad community and business input on values and preferences for tourist parks, led by the themes arising from the workshops.
Although the survey demonstrated support for a proposed re-development of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park, the earlier community workshops showed that local residents and representatives of the Quinns Rocks Environmental Group were concerned by the potential loss of native vegetation from any expansion of the site.
Community questions during Council’s consideration of the Business Case report, at the Briefing meeting on 15 September 2020 and the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 also referred to:
· The risk of loss of native vegetation at the site if the potential tourist park expanded beyond the original footprint; and
· The importance of the native vegetation, from an ecological perspective and more generally to the local community.
The petition is a further statement of concerns regarding a potential expansion of the site.
Consultation
No additional consultation has been undertaken in preparing this report. Previous consultation was described in the agenda report for the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 (item CS03-09/20).
Comment
The item under consideration at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 was not a proposal to develop the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park site. Instead, it involved a Business Case, which had used modelling to assess the potential viability of a redevelopment. Council endorsed the Business Case.
Administration prepared the report having regard to concerns regarding the ecological value of the native vegetation at Lot 211, which was further expressed by:
· Community questions during Council’s consideration of the report; and
· The petition.
Further information on the condition of the site is being compiled by Administration and will be made available on the City’s Your Say website for the project.
The resolution for item CS03-09/20 included a number of conditions to acknowledge the community interest in the site, including:
· The Expression of Interest will invite submissions on the original footprint of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park. (Modelling by Pracsys had indicated that a redevelopment of the original site may not be viable, but the Expression of Interest will test market interest.)
· Although the Expression of Interest will also invite submissions on an expanded footprint, the resolution stipulated that any expansion to the development footprint will only be to the extent reasonably required for the commercial viability of a development, while preserving the environmental value the majority of natural vegetation at Lot 211 (noting that the preservation of the environmental value will be an important criterion in the Expression of Interest process).
· Administration will undertake further community engagement in parallel with the Expression of Interest process, including:
o The development of a reference group (or groups) or an Advisory Group (or Advisory Groups), representing local, environmental/ heritage and business/ tourism interests, to inform Administration and the Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Re-Development Working Group on the development of the Expression of Interest documentation. A separate Administration report in relation to the Advisory Group will be presented to the same Council meeting as the present report; and
o The provision of information sessions for participants in the community workshops (and other interested parties) to convey further details on the Expression of Interest process.
The outcomes of the Expression of Interest process will be the subject of a future report to Council. In the event that a re-development of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park is the recommended outcome, this will require approval of Council.
Further, if a preferred lessee/ operator is approved by Council:
· Disposal of any part of Lot 211 by lease would need to comply with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995; and
· Development proposals or considerations will need to comply with applicable Legislation and relevant State Planning Policies, such as State Planning Policy 2.6 State Coastal Planning, and will require the approval of relevant agencies (including the Western Australian Planning Commission).
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.3 Distinctive Places
1.3.1Create distinctive places based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationship |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S12 Economic Growth |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O03 Land Development |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-022 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Risk Appetite
Society – Distinctive Places: The City will accept a moderate amount of reputational and financial risk in order to meet changing community service expectations.
Policy Implications
No additional policy implications arise from the subject matter on this report, aside from the information provided in the agenda report for the Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 (item CS03-09/20).
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:
1. NOTES:
a) Petition PT01-09/20 received at the 22 September 2020 Ordinary Council Meeting;
b) The resolution for item CS03-09/20 at the 22 September 2020 Ordinary Council Meeting;
c) A subsequent report will be provided to Council with the outcomes of the Expression of Interest process for the redevelopment of the former Quinns Rocks Caravan Park; and
d) Administration will progress with community engagement, described in paragraph 3 of the resolution for item CS03-09/20 at the 22 September 2020 Ordinary Council Meeting; and
2. ADVISES the Petition organiser of Council’s decision.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Lot 211 Quinns Road, Mindarie (Whole parcel) |
19/199585[v3] |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 394
3.19 Proposed New Lease and Surrender of Prior Lease to the Yanchep Sports & Social Club (Inc.) over Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep
File Ref: 6036V02 – 18/180230
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: CS08-10/17 - Proposed Surrender of Lease and new Lease to the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) over Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep - Ordinary Council - 10 Oct 2017 7.00pm
Issue
To consider a new lease to the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) over Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep, incorporating with a surrender of the prior lease.
Background
Land
Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep (Lot 1) is owned in freehold by the City and comprises an area of 3.2 hectares. The property is the whole of the land in Lot 1 on Diagram 52126 and Certificate of Title Volume 1497 Folio 32.
Lot 1 is zoned as ‘Urban’ under the MRS and ‘Urban Development’ under DPS2. The property is located within the strategic Yanchep town centre, bounded by Yanchep Beach Road to the north, a vacant lot that is currently proposed for a commercial development to the east, a commercial precinct to the south and Marmion Avenue to the west.
The future proposed Yanchep Activity Centre is proposed to be located further north (under ASP 100) which is intended to be a ‘Strategic Metropolitan Centre’ as classified under State Planning Policy 4.2. (SPP4.2.) Lot 1 (and its surrounds) has been identified as Yanchep South ‘District Centre” which is a lower order Centre under SPP 4.2.
Improvements on Lot 1 include a clubhouse with a licensed bar, associated car park, two grass bowling greens, three storage sea containers and a toilet block (Attachment 1 refers). In addition, there are two marked tennis courts on-site with associated fencing that are the sole responsibility of the City to maintain.
Prior Lease
The Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) (YSSC) has been a long-term lessee of Lot 1.
The current lease is for a term of twenty-one years, which commenced on 1 January 2001 and is scheduled to expire on 31 December 2021 (Prior Lease). The lease was approved by Council on 24 October 2000 (item W337-10/00). The Prior Lease was granted at a peppercorn rent, but also provided that YSSC was responsible for maintenance.
Future Land Use and Proposed Lease
Subsequent to the grant of the Prior Lease, the City’s Leasing Policy now provides that:
· Lease to ‘Not-For-Profit’ (NFP) entities or community facilities should be located on Crown land as opposed to City freehold land, and are expected to pay a maintenance fee in return for the City conducting routine maintenance works; and
· Freehold land should not be leased at a peppercorn rental.
The freehold status, location and zoning of Lot 1 provides an opportunity for future development by the City. In order to facilitate redevelopment, it is anticipated that YSSC will be relocated to an alternative site at a future time. However, no preferred site has been identified for the anticipated relocation; this process is anticipated to take at least ten years.
Due to the long term timeframe for a potential redevelopment of Lot 1, the City was supportive of granting a longer tenure for YSSC beyond the expiry date of the Prior Lease. Following discussions with Administration, YSSC submitted a request to surrender the Prior Lease and enter a new lease for a longer tenure.
Council resolved at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 16 October 2017 (CS08-10/17):
“That Council:-
1. AGREES to the termination of the existing Lease between the City of Wanneroo and the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) on City freehold Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep subject to the signing of a formal Deed of Surrender of Lease;
2. AUTHORISES the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a Deed of Surrender of Lease between the City and the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy;
3. APPROVES a new Lease of a portion of City freehold Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep (Attachment 2 refers) to the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) for a term of ten (10) years commencing upon the execution of the Deed of Surrender of Lease;
4. AUTHORISES the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a Lease between the City and the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy;
5. NOTES that the 5,000m2 (approximate) portion of Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep (Attachment 2 refers) proposed to be excised and maintained by the City will be available for future development considerations; and
6. Notes that should Council agree to the termination of the existing Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) Lease to facilitate a new Lease of greater tenure, the City proposes to enter into Sublease negotiations with the Yanchep Community Men’s Shed (Inc.) and the Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) over a portion of Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep.”
Subsequent Lease Negotiations
Initial negotiations between the City and YSSC following the Council resolution on 10 October 2017 focused on the proposal to excise a 5,000m2 (approximate) portion of Lot 1 (Excision Area) By resuming possession of the Excision Area, the City would be able to investigate development opportunities for the land.
The City and YSSC reached an in principle agreement on the proposed excision and the new lease, with documents being provided to YSSC in October 2017.
Subsequently, YSSC advised the City in writing on 3 May 2018 that:
· YSSC no longer wished to surrender the Excision Area, and YSSC wanted to renegotiate the terms of the draft lease;
· A building maintenance fee would be agreed, in accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy; and
· A proposed sublease to Yanchep Community Shed (Inc.) as outlined in resolution CS08-10/17(6) would no longer proceed.
Due to the further negotiations with YSSC and the changes to the lease proposal, the amended lease terms are now submitted for Council approval.
Detail
YSSC has agreed in writing to surrender its existing lease for a new lease of greater tenure in accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy.
YSSC has provided a comprehensive business plan that has been reviewed and deemed acceptable by Administration.
Administration and YSSC have negotiated a new lease on the following terms (and incorporating the surrender of the Prior Lease), subject to Council approval:
|
Premises: |
Portion of Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep (Attachment 1 refers) (Premises) |
|
Lease Term: |
Ten years, commencing on the Commencement Date |
|
Commencement Date: |
Upon surrender of the Prior Lease and execution of the proposed new lease by all parties |
|
Lease Rental: |
$1 per annum (peppercorn) |
|
Permitted Purpose: |
Clubrooms and uses reasonably ancillary thereto |
|
Annual Maintenance Fee: |
$3,222 (plus GST) per annum (subject to review on an annual basis) |
|
Lessors Maintenance Works: |
Lessor responsibility up to the value of the Annual Maintenance Fee:
· Fire equipment compliance servicing; · HVAC; · Roof and gutters; · Controlled waste (excluding grease trap); · Electrical; · Compliance; · Security and Keys; · Plumbing; · Pest Control; · Height Safety Inspections; and · External vandalism, external graffiti removal and glazing. |
|
Other Maintenance: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Cleaning: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Rates & Taxes: |
Lessee responsible for all rates (including Council rates and water rates), taxes, assessments and impositions
Note that Council Rates are currently waived for financial year 2020/2021 as resolved by Council |
|
Outgoings: |
Lessee responsibility for all outgoings (not limited to) electricity, gas, water and telephone/broadband connection used in relation to the Premises whether billed directly or otherwise |
|
Lessee Services: |
Lessee responsible for the provision of special requirements such as the connection of telephone and broadband services |
|
Grease Trap Cleaning: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Building Insurance: |
· Lessor responsibility to insure the building to the correct replacement value; and · Lessee responsibility to pay the premium as on-charged by the Lessor. |
|
Public Liability Insurance: |
Lessee responsibility – Minimum $20 million |
|
Other Insurance: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Consumables: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Structural Maintenance: |
Lessor responsibility |
|
Quiet Enjoyment: |
Lessee acknowledges that its quiet enjoyment of the Premises may be affected from time to time by works or trading in public places that the Lessor or its agents may reasonably undertake or facilitate in the vicinity of the Premises that may include but are not limited to:
· Disruption to utilities; · Disruption or closure of roads, or reserves; · Dedestrian movement and access; · Vehicle movement, access and parking; · Vibration and noise; and · Dust and dirt.
The Lessor will not be liable to compensate the Lessee in the event that the above affects the Lessee’s quiet enjoyment of the Premises. |
Special Conditions:
|
Assignment or Subletting: |
Lessee is not permitted to assign, sublet. licence or otherwise part with the possession of the Premises |
|
Alternative Site as New Premises: |
Lessor to advise Lessee should an alternative site become available for relocation purposes during the Term and provide surrender of lease and new lease documentation |
|
Access Track: |
The Lessee may use the existing track in the north-western portion of the Premises to enable vehicular access to the rear of the clubroom but must not obstruct it |
|
Maintenance of Grounds: |
Lessee responsibility: Maintain all lawn and vegetated areas including weeding, pruning and related maintenance of natural and landscaped areas |
|
Grease Trap: |
Lessee responsibility |
|
Bowling Greens & Immediate Surrounds: |
Lessee responsibility: Maintenance and capital replacement of bowling greens, shade structures, floodlighting |
|
Tennis Courts & Floodlighting: |
· Lessor responsibility and does not form part of the Premises (Attachment 1 refers); · Lessor to install an electrical submeter for the tennis court floodlighting; and · Hire of the tennis courts by the general public and the Lessee will be undertaken by the Lessor’s Facility booking team. |
The draft lease documentation was prepared by Administration, based on a City template which has been used on multiple previous leases with sporting groups and NFP organisations. The documentation was reviewed and approved by the City’s Legal Services unit in advance of submission to YSSC.
Consultation
· Relevant service units, including Facilities and Building Maintenance, have been consulted in the course of preparation of the lease terms. Administration is supportive of the proposed long term lease;
· The essential terms of the proposed lease together with a copy of the documentation have been presented to YSSC;
· YSSC agreed to the proposed essential terms and the draft documentation in writing on 7 September 2020;
· The City confirms that there is no plan for the City to develop Lot 1 in the short to medium term; and
· Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) approval to the proposed new lease under Section 136 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 is not required as the proposed term is less than twenty years.
Comment
Council previously approved the surrender of the Prior Lease and grant of a new lease. This proposed arrangement remains the subject of the recommendation of the present report, although the change to some of the essential lease terms mean that a further Council approval is required.
YSSC has been a stable lessee for many years. Administration remains confident that YSSC will manage the proposed new lease in accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy.
The proposed new lease will clarify both the City and YSSC’s responsibilities to maintain the Premises to the required standard.
Administration has advised the current and previous YSSC Committees that Lot 1 may be utilised for alternative purposes in the future which would require YSSC to relocate from the existing premises. The City will continue to consult YSSC over any future relocation plans, which would be the subject of a future report to Council (in the event those plans progressed).
Administration does not anticipate there being any operational requirements for the City to use the Premises during the term of the new lease.
Administration recommends that Council approve the City entering a lease with YSSC on the essential lease terms described in the present report for a period of ten years in accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy.
Statutory Compliance
Under regulation 30 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 (WA), the proposed lease to YSSC is an exempt disposition of property to which section 3.58 of the Act does not apply.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issues contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
The following additional comments are provided on the risk arising from the subject of this report.
|
Current Risk |
Mitigation |
|
Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) on-site: |
· The Premises is recorded on the City’s asbestos register and is resurveyed on a regular basis. · The City is to continue to provide YSSC with a copy of the latest available asbestos report when made available. · The City is compliant with its asbestos inspection requirements. |
|
ACM present within tennis court surface: |
· The Premises is recorded on the City’s Asbestos register and is resurveyed on a regular basis. · The risk to users during normal activity is minimal as it is the membrane under the asphalt surface covering that contains the ACM. · The City arranged for the courts to be asphalted in 2019. |
|
Financial: |
A new lease would prevent the City from developing, leasing or selling Lot 1 for commercial purposes for a ten year period. |
Policy Implications
The proposed new lease has been negotiated in accordance with the terms of the City’s Leasing Policy, except that the use of freehold land for non-commercial purposes is inconsistent with the Leasing Policy. However, Administration notes that the continued occupation by YSSC will be on an interim basis.
Financial Implications
· YSSC will be charged an annual maintenance fee of $3,222 (plus GST) per annum in accordance with the Leasing Policy, subject to review on an annual basis.
· The City’s insurer LGISs will insure the Premises. The premium will be on-charged to YSSC. This arrangement will continue for the duration of the proposed new lease.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. RESCINDS Resolution CS08-10/17 of the Ordinary Council Meeting on 10 October 2017;
2. APPROVES:
a) The surrender of the prior lease between the City of Wanneroo and Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) for premises at Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep; and
b) A new lease of a portion of Lot 1 (81) Yanchep Beach Road, Yanchep (Attachment 1 refers) to Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) for a term of ten years commencing upon the execution of the new lease and surrender of lease documentation for the prior lease;
3. AUTHORISES:
a) The Chief Executive Officer to negotiate commercial terms, execute all documentation and comply with all applicable legislation as is required to effect Item 2. above; and
b) The affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to a surrender of lease and a new lease between the City of Wanneroo and Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) in accordance with the City's Execution of Documents Policy; and
4. NOTES:
a) The proposed lease is not consistent with the use of City-owned freehold land identified in the City’s Leasing Policy; and
b) The City may, at a future time, relocate Yanchep Sports and Social Club (Inc.) from the existing premises, with such relocation proposal to be the subject of a future report to Council.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Yanchep Sports & Social Club (Inc.) - Premises |
20/457635 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 404
File Ref: 32819V04 – 20/539409
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 10
Previous Items: CS07-04/19 - Old Yanchep Surf Club Redevelopment - Ordinary Council - 09 Apr 2019 7.00pm
CR03-03/18 - Old Yanchep Surf Club Redevelopment Expression of Interest - Ordinary Council - 06 Mar 2018 7.00pm
CP06-08/19 - Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan - Final - Ordinary Council - 27 Aug 2019 7.00pm
Issue
To consider the status of the Old Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club site at Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 (3) Brazier Road, Yanchep (Lot 10603), including the proposed transfer of the redevelopment project to another proponent.
Background
Lot 10603 – Reserve 39022
Lot 10603 is a Category C reserve, described as Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553, being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume LR3147 Folio 21 (Lot 10603) (Attachments 1 and 2 refer).
The site is located in the Yanchep Lagoon precinct and is the former location of the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club (Inc.). The old premises became vacant following the Club’s relocation to the new surf club in 2017. The premises on Lot 10603 have been disused since that time.
Lot 10603 comprises an area of 2,130m2 and is currently zoned ‘Parks & Recreation’ under the MRS and ‘Regional Parks & Recreation’ under DPS2.
An updated management order was issued to the City in August 2020 following negotiations with DPLH during 2019 and 2020 (Attachment 3 refers). The management order permits the City to lease or licence the site for an initial term of up to 21 years, but with scope for further options to a total term of 42 years. The 42 year total is unusual for Crown land and is a positive outcome for the City; it was intended to support development on the site, subject to a requirement for the State to be advised of coastal erosion conditions before it approves a grant of an option to extend beyond the initial 21 year term.
The potential to redevelop Lot 10603 was identified during the early stages of the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan project. Although the Master Plan process was still ongoing (and was not finalised until mid-2019), the City commenced investigations on Lot 10603 during 2017.
Expression of Interest – Approved Proponent
The City commenced a two-stage Expression of Interest (EOI) process in October 2017. The EOI requested demolition of the existing building on Lot 10603 (being the Old Yanchep Surf Club) and the exploration of potential redevelopment for an aspirational and iconic commercial opportunity.
The EOI process was intended to identify a preferred candidate for a ground lease of Lot 10603, with the terms to be finalised by negotiation with that candidate. Although it was not a formal tender, Administration noted the anticipated community interest and size of the project, and conducted a process in the manner of a formal tender evaluation. The City employed William Buck to provide probity oversight.
Following consideration by Council in March 2018 (CR03-03/18), the EOI progressed to a second stage in early 2018. A Stage 2 EOI Information Pack was issued to the three eligible candidates, with a closing date of 15 June 2018. Candidates were encouraged to undertake their own due diligence, particularly with regard to compliance and approvals relative to their proposed land use.
Submissions were received from two candidates (the third deciding not to submit):
· Be Our Guest Holdings Pty Ltd (the company which operates the ‘Dome’ business and related hospitality sites) (Be Our Guest); and
· ISpy Entertainment (which ultimately amended the candidate entity to Westland Corporate Pty Ltd t/as ‘Laguna – Fresh Starts’) (Westland).
Through evaluation of detailed quantitative and qualitative criteria, which included a presentation by each candidate, there was a preference for the concept developed by the group ultimately represented by Westland.
Following negotiations between Administration and Westland, proposed essential lease terms were submitted to the Ordinary Council Meeting on 9 April 2019 (CS07-04/19). The report was prepared as an open item, but with the full commercial terms marked as confidential. Council resolved to approve Westland as the proponent for the project, in the following terms:
“That Council:-
1. In respect of the proposed head lease between the City of Wanneroo and the State of Western Australia (represented by the Minister for Lands) for Crown Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553, being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume LR3147 Folio 21 (“Head Lease”), AUTHORISES:
a) The Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and enter into the Head Lease for a term of for up to 42 years; and
b) The affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Head Lease; and
c) Subject to the final terms of the Head Lease being agreed in accordance with items 1a) and b), a request to the Minister for Lands to cancel the management order for Crown Reserve 39022;
2. In respect of the proposed Agreement for Sub-Lease and Ground Sub-Lease between the City of Wanneroo and Westland Corporate Pty Ltd (ACN 008 774 267) trading as “Laguna – Fresh Starts” for Crown Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553, being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume LR3147 Folio 21 (“Agreement for Sub-Lease and Ground Sub-Lease”):
a) AUTHORISES:
i) the publication of a local public notice of the intention to dispose of Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553 in accordance with Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 (WA); and
ii) the Chief Executive Officer to consider and reject any public submissions with regard to Item 2b);
b) NOTES that Council Members will be provided with a briefing by Administration in relation to the advertising of the disposal under Item 2a);
c) APPROVES, subject to the Head Lease being agreed under item 1 and the Chief Executive Officer considering (and rejecting, if applicable) responses from advertising the disposal under Item 2a) ii), the draft Agreement for Sub-Lease and Ground Sub-Lease; and
d) AUTHORISES:
i) the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate the final terms of the Agreement for Sub-Lease and Ground Sub-Lease; and
ii) the affixing of the Common Seal of the City of Wanneroo to the Agreement for Sub-Lease and Ground Sub-Lease in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy; and
3. NOTES the Development Application and Application for Demolition Permit will be signed by the Chief Executive Officer to commence the planning process and demolish the Old Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Club to enable the redevelopment of Crown Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553, being the whole of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Volume LR3147 Folio 21.”
At the time of the April 2019 report, Administration had anticipated that the State (via DPLH) would only permit a head lease and sublease arrangement, whereby the City would enter a head lease with the State, and the City would then sublease to Westland. However, as explained above, DPLH subsequently granted a management order with a sufficient power to lease or licence in order to facilitate the development.
Negotiations with Westland
Following the resolution of Council in April 2019, Administration finalised community engagement and advertised a local public notice for the proposed disposal to Westland.
Proposed lease documents were prepared by the City’s external lawyers (Clayton Utz) and submitted for Westland’s approval:
· Agreement for Lease (AFL), which dealt with the development approval and construction phase of the project; and
· Lease (as a ground lease), which administered the long term operation of the site.
Negotiations progressed throughout 2019, with multiple rounds of document review and amendment. During this process, Westland provided its comments in a piecemeal fashion, with some items identified in stages after Westland’s initial feedback.
In order for Westland’s business model to be successful, Westland was reliant on constructing the development and then subletting to operators of the hospitality businesses at the site. In April 2020, Westland’s representatives advised Administration that due to current economic climate and the Covid-19 pandemic, it was experiencing difficulties securing sublessees for the proposed development, which meant that the financial viability of the project was less secure.
Although Administration and Clayton Utz prepared further clauses in the AFL and Lease to address Westland’s concerns, Westland advised Administration in October 2020 it did not intend to proceed with the project, and that it proposed that the second ranking candidate at the Stage 2 EOI (Be Our Guest) would take over the project.
More information was provided to Administration at a meeting with representatives of Westland and Be Our Guest in mid-October 2020. Be Our Guest agreed to provide a submission to describe how it would take over and complete the project.
Detail
The submission from Be Our Guest was received on 23 November 2020. A copy is provided as Attachment 4 (as a confidential attachment).
Be Our Guest’s submission follows the terms of its 2018 EOI submission, which remains the basis for the new proposal (Attachment 5 and 6 refer).
Due to the commercially sensitive nature of the proposal, the Be Our Guest submission documents are provided with the present report as confidential attachments. An extract of the preliminary designs for the proposed development and the proposed menu are provided as Attachments 7 and 8. The designs would be subject to amendment during the negotiation of the AFL and in the course of securing development approval.
The proposal from Be Our Guest offers a number of advantages to be considered by Council in determining whether to progress with negotiations:
· The proposal was previously considered during the EOI process and was a close second to the Westland submission;
· Be Our Guest has identified that the proposal aligns with the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan, including the following design elements:
o Open buildings with transparent facades, operable walls and unenclosed spaces;
o Wide eaves, verandas and canopy roofs creating shady spaces;
o Natural limestone and wood material with contemporary character;
o Lightweight and sustainable construction methods; and
o In the case of Lot 10603, a new low impact structure accommodating a casual and family friendly bar, kiosk and function space. This area allows for activity to spill out into the surrounding landscape with live music and events;
· Be Our Guest has already invested in planning for the development, and has experience in delivering large, complex hospitality and tourism ventures. In particular, the Premier Mill Hotel in Katanning and the Farmers’ Home Hotel in Northam provide examples of projects successfully completed by Be Our Guest which most closely align with the Yanchep development. In the case of the Premier Mill Hotel, the redevelopment of the historic building was recognised with the Lachlan Macquarie Award for Heritage in the 2019 National Architecture Awards. It is also noted that Be Our Guest has significant experience in developing and operating ‘Dome’ branded sites (Attachment 9 refers).
· Be Our Guest’s experience are expected to be support of the objectives of the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan, which was formally adopted by Council in August 2019, after Be Our Guest had made its original submissions to the EOI;
· Be Our Guest intends to run the site with a direct interest in the hospitality operation (potentially under a joint venture arrangement with an established franchisee), rather than simply build the development and enter subleases with the operators. The latter scenario was the Westland operating model, and was arguably more exposed to deteriorating leasing conditions;
· A financial review of Be Our Guest provides a positive assessment of the company’s standing (Attachment 10 refers). In the current economic conditions, a party of Be Our Guest’s capacity is likely to have a better capacity to complete the project; and
· Be Our Guest has advised that it is largely satisfied with the terms of the AFL and Lease which had been prepared by Clayton Utz on behalf of the City and negotiated with Westland. The AFL and Lease will require final review by the City’s internal legal section, but limiting the scope of amendments will expedite the remaining negotiations.
Administration notes that the following considerations will need to be addressed before lease documentation is agreed with Be Our Guest:
· Be Our Guest has proposed that Westland enters the AFL and Lease, and then assigns its interest to Be Our Guest. Although this may be convenient for a transaction between Westland and Be Our Guest (to sell Westland’s intellectual property in the project), this format:
o Overlooks the fact that Westland does not have a formal interest in the land, given that the AFL and Lease remain under negotiation and have not been executed by the parties;
o Also overlooks that the Westland and Be Our Guest proposals result in different developments, so that Be Our Guest is not simply taking over Westland’s project, but is delivering a different project; and
o Will mean that two consents are required from the Minister for Lands under section 18 of the Land Administration Act 1997 (WA) (LAA) being an initial consent to the AFL and Lease, and a subsequent consent for the assignment to Be Our Guest
For these reasons, Administration recommends that Be Our Guest enters the AFL and Lease in its own capacity, rather than taking an assignment from Westland. This format would need to be negotiated with Be Our Guest:
· Be Our Guest has identified items in the AFL and Lease which need to be resolved to its satisfaction. These items are unlikely to be significant obstacles, but the experience with Westland indicates that they may delay negotiations. Further, aspects of the Lease (such as the inclusion of a turnover rent based on sublease rental) will not be applicable to Be Our Guest’s operating model and should be renegotiated;
· In accordance with the requirements of section 3.58 of the Act, the proposal will require:
o A market valuation to confirm the proposed rental; and
o A local public notice of the proposed lease; and
· The Westland proposal was the subject of community engagement in addition to the local public notice. This consultation was described in the Consultation section of the Administration report for the Ordinary Council Meeting on 9 April 2019. Similar community engagement should be invited in relation to the Be Our Guest proposal, including engagement with the Yanchep Lagoon Community Working Group (Working Group). Additional engagement should involve the Working Group to ensure that the Be Our Guest development is consistent with the Yanchep Lagoon precinct and the needs of the local community.
In noting the potential for the City to progress with Be Our Guest as the preferred proponent, Administration acknowledges there have been occasional enquiries from other parties with a potential interest in developing Lot 10603. However, these enquiries are only considered speculative at the current time; the proposals would require further review and due diligence. Any alternative proposals would also need to be considered for alignment with the Master Plan and community expectations.
Whilst the City could opt to undertake a further Expression of Interest process, this would risk Be Our Guest withdrawing its interest, and would involve a delay of at least 6-12 months to the project.
Consultation
Extensive consultation and engagement occurred throughout the development of the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan and in relation to the Westland proposal.
Due to the interest of the community and other stakeholders in the future development of Lot 10603, Administration recommends the City undertakes the engagement and consultation described in the Comment section of the present report.
Comment
For the above reasons provided in the Detail section of the present report, Administration anticipates that further negotiation with Be Our Guest (and Westland) will be required before the AFL and Lease are finalised for Council approval. However, the proposal from Be Our Guest provides a positive opportunity to progress with the development of Lot 10603 and to support the continued implementation of the Yanchep Lagoon Master Plan.
Administration recommends that Council approves continued negotiations with Be Our Guest (and Westland), on the basis that:
· Administration requests Be Our Guest’s agreement to enter the AFL and Lease in its own capacity, rather than by an assignment from Westland. Any sale of the project interest between Be Our Guest and Westland should be a matter between those parties;
· Administration also finalises the AFL and Lease negotiations with Be Our Guest, so that the documents are agreed in principle, and also approved by the Minister for Lands under section 18 of the LAA;
· A local public notice is published for the proposed disposal to Be Our Guest;
· Community engagement occurs in a similar form to the engagement in relation to the Westland proposal, including:
o Community members who participated in the Master Plan PDF (November 2018) (approximately 70 stakeholder and community representatives);
o Community members who registered to participate in the PDF but were not selected (approximately 20 people);
o People who attended the Community Open Evening (17 December 2018) (approximately 35 people);
o People who subscribed online to be kept up-to-date on the Yanchep Lagoon project (approximately 200 people); and
o Community members in a catchment incorporating an area east of the Yanchep Lagoon, bounded by Marmion Avenue to the east, Lagoon Drive / Oldham Park / Anchors Park to the south and a northern extension to Capricorn Esplanade/ Templetonia Boulevard. Approximately 2,000 households/ businesses are included in the catchment area; and
· Inviting Be Our Guest to provide a presentation and receive feedback from the Working Group.
The proposed AFL and Lease will be submitted for final Council approval following completion of the above actions.
Statutory Compliance
The proposal disposal will require compliance with section 3.58 of the Act.
Further legislation which may be applicable to the proposal by Be Our Guest includes:
· Planning and Development Act 2005 (WA);
· Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA);
· Land Administration Act 1997 (WA); and
· Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA).
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.3 Distinctive Places
1.3.1Create distinctive places based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S12 Economic Growth |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning and Sustainability |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Management Team |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O20 Productive Communities |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-022 Environmental Management |
High |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management system.
Policy Implications
Lease negotiations will continue in accordance with the City’s Leasing Policy.
Financial Implications
The City will receive a ground lease rental income under the Lease. This income will be delayed until the Lease has commenced (following the works required by the AFL) and potentially for an additional rent free period (which had been negotiated with Westland).
In addition to fees incurred to date in the negotiations with Westland (which have been met under existing operational budgets), further operational costs will include:
· Postage costs in relation to the letters issued in the course of the community consultation;
· Legal fees (Clayton Utz) of approximately $5,000-$10,000 (plus GST), assuming that the remaining negotiations are not protracted;
· Valuation fees of $2,000-$2,500 (plus GST) for the market rent valuation;
· A fee of $1,000 (plus GST) (approximate) for publishing a local public notice in the Wanneroo Times; and
· Landgate registration fees (unless agreed to be borne by Be Our Guest under the Lease).
There is also the potential that the City will be required to undertake works to support the development of Lot 10603 (in the case of Westland, these related to upgrading an accessway to the beach adjacent to Lot 10603). Costs in relation to this aspect will be confirmed when the proposed AFL and Lease are submitted for final Council consideration.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES:
a) Further to the resolution of Council on 9 April 2019 (CS07-04/19), Westland Corporate Pty Ltd (ACN 008 774 267) trading as ‘Laguna – Fresh Starts’ has advised the City that it does not have the capacity to undertake and complete the proposed redevelopment of Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553; and
b) Be Our Guest Pty Ltd (ACN 129 257 147), being the second ranking applicant under the City’s Expression of Interest process, has proposed to undertake the redevelopment of Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553 from Westland Corporate Pty Ltd (ACN 008 774 267) trading as ‘Laguna – Fresh Starts’;
2. AUTHORISES:
a) The Chief Executive Officer (or a nominee of the Chief Executive Officer) to negotiate commercial terms for an Agreement for Lease and a Lease of Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553 with Be Our Guest Pty Ltd (ACN 129 257 147) (or a nominee of Be Our Guest Pty Ltd);
b) The publication of a local public notice of the intention to dispose the portion of Reserve 39022, Lot 10603 on Deposited Plan 186553 to Be Our Guest Pty Ltd (ACN 129 257 147) (or a nominee of Be Our Guest Pty Ltd); and
c) The invitation of public comments on the proposed development by Be Our Guest Pty Ltd (ACN 129 257 147); and
3. NOTES a further report will be provided to Council to consider:
a) The proposed Agreement for Lease and the Lease with Be Our Guest Pty Ltd (ACN 129 257 147); and
b) The responses to Items 2.b) and c).
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Site Plan - Lot 10603 (Reserve 39022) and Yanchep Lagoon Precinct |
20/539575 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Reserve 39022 - Certificate of Title |
20/539461 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Reserve 39022 - Management Order |
20/539463 |
|
|
4. |
Submission email - Be Our Guest |
Confidential |
|
|
5. |
Be Our Guest - Yanchep EOI Detailed Submission - July 2018 - Part 1 |
Confidential |
|
|
6. |
Be Our Guest - Yanchep EOI Detailed Submission - July 2018 - Part 2 |
Confidential |
|
|
7⇩. |
Be Our Guest - Preliminary design |
20/540635 |
|
|
8⇩. |
Be Our Guest - Proposed Menu |
20/539877 |
|
|
9⇩. |
Be Our Guest - Sample of prior developments |
20/540642 |
|
|
10. |
Corporate Scorecard - Be Our Guest |
Confidential |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 462
Council & Corporate Support
3.21 Review of Wards and Representation - Outcome of Community Consultation and Consideration of Proposal to the Local Government Advisory Board
File Ref: 41102 – 20/537519
Responsible Officer: Director Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
For Council to consider the outcome of the community consultation for the review of Wards and representation of the City of Wanneroo, and to consider a proposal to the Local Government Advisory Board (LGAB).
Background
Local governments that have a Ward system are required to review their Ward boundaries and representation at least every eight years. As a result of its review, a local government may recommend any of the following proposals to the LGAB for consideration:
· Creating new Wards in a District already divided into Wards;
· Changing the boundaries of a Ward;
· Abolishing any or all of the Wards into which a District is divided;
· Changing the name of a District or a Ward;
· Changing the number of offices of Councillor on a Council; and/or
· Specifying or changing the number of offices of Councillor for a Ward.
Clause 8 of Schedule 2.2 of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that proposals be assessed under the specific factors which are:
· Community of interest;
· Physical and topographical features;
· Demographic trends;
· Economic factors; and
· The ratio of Councillors to Electors in the various Wards.
The Local Government Advisory Board (LGAB) receives and assesses reviews of wards and representation undertaken by local governments and makes recommendations to the Minister for Local Government as to whether or not local governments have taken these factors into account.
Explanatory details regarding the factors for assessment are provided in the table below.
|
Community of Interest |
The term community of interest has a number of elements. These include a sense of community identity and belonging, similarities in the characteristics of the residents of a community and similarities in the economic activities.
It can also include dependence on the shared facilities in an area as reflected in catchment areas of local schools and sporting teams, or the circulation areas of local newspapers. Neighborhoods, suburbs and towns are important units in the physical, historical and social infrastructure and often generate a feeling of community and belonging. |
|
Physical and Topographic Features |
These may be natural or man-made features that will vary from area to area. Water features such as rivers and catchment boundaries may be relevant considerations.
Coastal plain and foothills regions, parks and reserves may be relevant as may other man made features such as railway lines and freeways. |
|
Demographic Trends |
Several measurements of the characteristics of human populations, such as population size, and its distribution by age, sex, occupation and location provide important demographic information. Current and projected population characteristics will be relevant as well as similarities and differences between areas within the local government. |
|
Economic Factors |
Economic factors can be broadly interpreted to include any factor that reflects the character of economic activities and resources in the area.
This may include the industries that occur in a local government area (or the release of land for these) and the distribution of community assets and infrastructure such as road networks. |
|
Ratio of Councillors to Electors |
The Board considers that the ratio of Councillors to Electors is particularly significant. It is expected that each local government will have similar ratios of Electors to Councillors across its Wards.
The Board will generally not support deviations of more than plus or minus 10% of the average ratio of electors to Councillors between Wards. |
If satisfied that a review has properly taken these factors into consideration, the LGAB then makes a recommendation to the Minister for Local Government as to whether or not the proposal should be approved. The Minister may accept or reject the LGAB’s recommendation.
While the City is not required to undertake a review unless directed by the LGAB until the ordinary Council Elections scheduled for 2023, nothing prevents it from doing so more frequently. At its meeting held on 22 September 2020 (CS04-09/20), Council resolved to:
“1. INITIATE a review of the City’s Wards and Representation system in accordance with clause 6 of Schedule 2.2 of the Local Government Act 1995;
2. GIVE local public notice of its intention to carry out a review of wards and representation and invites submissions as required by Clause 7(1) of Schedule 2.2; and
3. ENDORSE the Discussion Paper detailed in Attachment 1, for the purposes of community consultation.”
The community consultation, required for a minimum period of six weeks, opened on 25 September 2020 and closed on 9 November 2020. This report provides the outcome from that community consultation period and details options for a proposal to the LGAB.
Detail
The last review of Wards and representation came into effect at the ordinary Council Elections in October 2015. That review implemented the existing arrangements for the District of Wanneroo being divided into three Wards, represented by a Mayor elected at large and 14 Councillors.
As previously mentioned, a local government is expected to have similar ratios of Councillors to Electors across its wards. A deviation of plus or minus (+/-) 10% is generally considered acceptable. A negative deviation result indicates that the Ward is under-represented, and a positive deviation result indicates the Ward is over-represented.
Historically, the elector ratios for the City have been as follows:
(Note that red text indicates a result outside the acceptable +/-10% ratio deviation)
|
|
% Ratio Deviation |
|
|||
|
Ward |
2011 Election |
2013 Election |
2015 Election |
2017 Election |
2019 Election |
|
North Coast |
|
|
2.87% |
-6.75% |
-10.51% |
|
North |
22.28% |
9.39% |
|
|
|
|
Coastal |
1.14% |
0.71% |
|
|
|
|
Central |
-14.84% |
-12.58% |
-6.62% |
-2.65% |
-1.14% |
|
South |
-0.92% |
3.22% |
2.43% |
8.87% |
11.42% |
As at 30 June 2020, the total number of Electors for the District of Wanneroo as recorded by the West Australian Electoral Commission (WAEC) has increased to 125,084. Based on the data from the WAEC the ratio by ward as at 30 June 2020 was:
|
Ward |
Number of Councillors |
Number of electors** |
Councillor to elector Ratio |
% ratio deviation |
|
North Coast |
5 |
49,969 |
1:9,994 |
-11.22% |
|
Central |
4 |
36,176 |
1:9,044 |
-0.65% |
|
South |
5 |
39,659 |
1:7,932 |
11.73% |
|
TOTAL |
14 |
125,804 |
1:8,986 |
|
** the number of electors as recorded by the WAEC as at 30 June 2020 does not include the Owners and Occupiers roll enrolments (297 electors as at the 2019 election)
The North Coast Ward and South Ward fall slightly outside the acceptable ratio of Electors per Councillor. This means that the North Coast Ward is currently under represented, whilst the South Ward is currently over represented. This disparity is projected to increase based on projected forecasts.
The Discussion Paper (Attachment 1) endorsed by Council for community consultation outlined a number of options, based on preliminary modelling scenarios, to encourage and assist members of the public to provide input into the review process. These options were:
1. No Wards – maintain existing number of Councillors and remove all Ward boundaries;
2. Create two Wards with even distribution of seven Councillors per Ward;
3. Maintain the current three Ward system with no change to boundaries or Councillor representation;
4. Maintain existing three Ward system but adjust Councillor representation numbers within Wards;
5. Create six Wards; and
6. Create seven Wards with two Councillors per Ward.
It is important to note that the purpose of the initial modelling in the Discussion Paper was to encourage discussion and submissions from the community. The Council did not have a position on any preferred option.
Consultation
The Discussion Paper, including survey, was developed and endorsed by Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 22 September 2020 (CS04-09/20) to encourage the community to participate in the review process by providing submissions. In accordance with clause 7 of Schedule 2.2 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act), community consultation was undertaken for a minimum period of six weeks from 25 September through to 9 November 2020, inclusive. Local public notice was given that a review was being undertaken as follows:
· Public notice advertised in the Wanneroo Times newspaper on 25 September 2020;
· Public notice and printed surveys at all City of Wanneroo libraries and the Civic Centre building;
· Advertising banner/information on the City of Wanneroo website;
· Dedicated page, including survey weblinks, on the City of Wanneroo ‘Have Your Say’ internet page;
· Advertising on City of Wanneroo social media – Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter;
· Links and promotion within information forming part of the advertising of the four yearly Community Strategic Plan review;
· Surveys provided at the Yanchep Two Rocks Access Centre (YTRAC); and
· Re-promotion on the City’s website and social media pages for the final eight to 10 days of the submission period.
An independent news article regarding the review also appeared in the Yanchep News Online.
At the close of the consultation period, a total of 19 submissions had been received. By comparison, there were four submissions received for the last review undertaken in 2015.
Members of the public were asked to rank the options listed in the discussion paper and submit any other options or ideas for the review. The results are below.
|
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Very Poor |
No Rating Provided |
Total Responses Received |
|
|
Option 1 (No Wards) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
2 |
19 |
|
Option 2 (2 Wards, 7 Cllrs per Ward) |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
19 |
|
Option 3 (No change) |
1 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
19 |
|
Option 4 (3 Wards, adjust Cllrs per Ward) |
1 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
|
Option 5 (6 Wards) |
4 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
19 |
|
Option 6 (7 Wards) |
6 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
19 |
In summary as shown in the below chart, of the submissions received, the results were:
· There was least support for reducing Wards to either no Wards or two Wards, with a total respondent rating Poor to Very Poor of 74% and 68% respectively not in favour of those options.
· There was most support indicated for increasing to a six or seven Ward system. With a total respondent rating Good to Very Good of 47% and 37% respectively being in favour of those options.
· 53% of respondents rated maintaining the current three Ward system (changed or unchanged) as Poor to Very Poor.
The responses received varied across the existing Wards, with most responses (58%) received from the North Coast Ward.
The survey provided opportunity for additional comments and encouraged other ideas from the community. A summary of comments received is detailed in Attachment 2.
As a result of the community consultation which indicated majority favour towards having more Wards within the District, further consideration was given to exploring potential six Ward and seven Ward options.
Comment
The principles applied for the options in the Discussion Paper included keeping whole suburbs within one Ward. The main reasons for using existing suburb boundaries are:
1. Electors and residents are more likely to know which ward they are in based on their suburb which may encourage participation in local government Elections;
2. While reflecting the pattern and pace of development, suburbs also tend to reflect the other criteria in the Act such as:
a) Communities of interest contained around places such as schools and local parks;
b) There are often significant physical boundaries (for example roads) in place that delineate suburbs;
c) Economic activity tends to be concentrated in areas that reflect suburb boundaries (e.g. Wangara and light industry; Neerabup, Nowergup and Carabooda and market gardens/ agriculture).
3. It is easier to calculate the Councillor:Elector ratios without complex and time consuming interrogation of electoral rolls and population statistics.
Creating Ward boundaries based around suburb alignment also limited the ability to identify scenarios compliant with the plus/minus 10% ratio of Electors per Councillor considered acceptable by the LGAB. Therefore, further modelling using ‘population cell data’ available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) was investigated. This methodology may mean that suburb boundaries are no longer aligned to Ward boundaries. ABS cells do not always follow suburb boundaries, major roads, physical and topographic features etc. and Ward boundaries may therefore become less distinct. The benefit of this methodology; however, is that there is greater flexibility in adjusting wards to align with the +/-10% Councillor:Elector ratio.
Options for Consideration
Conway Highbury, represented by Chris Liversage, completed further detailed modelling using data based on ABS ‘cell population data’ across the District. Tested scenarios for six Wards and seven Wards have aimed to maintain suburb integrity to the degree possible whilst achieving a compliant Councillor:Elector ratio. These scenarios do not take into consideration the City’s Owner and Occupier Roll of Electors. The total number of Electors on that roll as at the October 2019 Election was 297 Electors. It is important to note that, dependent on actual growth of Electors, future adjustments may be required. This means the Council may need to consider undertaking another review, prior to the end of the next eight year period. In the following options, where Councillor:Elector ratio is projected to fall outside the +/-10% accepted deviation, the ratio has been highlighted using red text.
The most viable resultant options consisting of three, six or seven wards are detailed below.
Current Situation - Option 3 of the Discussion Paper - Consisting of Existing Three Wards with no Change to Representation
This option (Attachment 3) maintained the existing three Wards and the number of Councillors per Ward, without any change to the boundaries. Modelling indicates that with this option the Councillor:Elector deviation is expected to almost double in the North Coast and South Wards within the eight year period:
The projected Councillor:Elector ratio forecast is:
|
Parameters |
Electors 2020 |
Projected electors 2024 |
Projected electors 2028 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
No of Cllrs |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
|
North Coast |
5 |
49,969 |
9,994 |
-11.22% |
54,439 |
10,888 |
-14.48% |
63,525 |
12,705 |
-20.27% |
|
Central |
4 |
36,176 |
9,044 |
-0.65% |
38,170 |
9,543 |
-0.33% |
42,709 |
10,677 |
-1.07% |
|
South |
5 |
39,659 |
7,932 |
11.73% |
40,545 |
8,109 |
14.74% |
41,661 |
8,332 |
21.13% |
|
Totals |
14 |
125,804 |
8,986 |
|
133,154 |
9,511 |
|
147,895 |
10,564 |
|
Maintaining the existing arrangement without any change is unlikely to be supported by the LGAB, did not receive community support and is not recommended as a viable proposal.
Option 4 of the Discussion Paper - Consisting of Existing Three Wards with Change to Representation
This Option (Attachment 4) consists of the existing three Ward structure maintaining the existing boundaries, with an adjusted Councillor representation across those Wards as follows:
· Reduce the number of Councillor representatives in the South Ward from five Councillors down to four Councillors;
· Increase the number of Councillor representatives in the North Coast Ward from five Councillors up to six Councillors; and
· Maintain the number of Councillor representatives in the Central Ward without change at four Councillors.
The projected Councillor:Elector ratio forecast is:
|
Parameters |
Electors 2020 |
Projected electors 2024 |
Projected electors 2028 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
No of Cllrs |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
|
North Coast |
6 |
49969 |
8328 |
7.32% |
54439 |
9073 |
4.60% |
63525 |
10588 |
-0.22% |
|
Central |
4 |
36176 |
9044 |
-0.65% |
38170 |
9543 |
-0.33% |
42709 |
10677 |
-1.07% |
|
South |
4 |
39659 |
9915 |
-10.34% |
40545 |
10136 |
-6.57% |
41661 |
10415 |
1.41% |
|
Totals |
14 |
125804 |
8986 |
|
133154 |
9511 |
|
147895 |
10564 |
|
The slight under representation of Electors in the South Ward in 2020 is eliminated by growth in other Wards and is stable until 2028. This is considered likely to be acceptable to the LGAB; however, the ratio could still potentially be readily made to comply with a slight adjustment to move electors from the South to the Central ward (using ABS cells).
This option fulfils the criteria of assessment against the factors and may be considered as a viable proposal to the LGAB; however, this option was not as strongly supported through the community consultation process.
Amended Option 5 of the Discussion Paper – Consisting of Six wards
This option (Attachment 5) proposes two Wards with three Councillor representatives and four Wards with two Councillor representatives. There are three suburbs – Marangaroo, Wangara and Gnangara - that are split across wards.
The projected Councillor:Elector ratio forecast is:
|
Parameters |
Electors 2020 |
Projected electors 2024 |
Projected electors 2028 |
|||||||
|
Ward |
No of Cllrs |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
|
1 |
2 |
19566 |
9783 |
8.87% |
19612 |
9806 |
3.10% |
19698 |
9849 |
-6.76% |
|
2 |
2 |
19244 |
9622 |
7.08% |
20061 |
10030 |
5.46% |
21047 |
10523 |
-0.38% |
|
3 |
2 |
18617 |
9309 |
3.59% |
19537 |
9769 |
2.71% |
22883 |
11441 |
8.31% |
|
4 |
3 |
26308 |
8769 |
-2.41% |
27486 |
9162 |
-3.67% |
29315 |
9772 |
-7.50% |
|
5 |
2 |
17586 |
8793 |
-2.15% |
18258 |
9129 |
-4.02% |
18873 |
9437 |
-10.67% |
|
6 |
3 |
24483 |
8161 |
-9.18% |
28201 |
9400 |
-1.16% |
36073 |
12024 |
13.83% |
|
14 |
125804 |
8986 |
133155 |
9511 |
147887 |
10563 |
||||
For this option, it would be possible to bring the percentage ratio deviations into compliance in 2028 in time for the Elections scheduled for 2029 if another review was undertaken, which included a slight adjustment to the boundary between Wards five and six. However, this is assuming growth does occur as predicted and any such review would be dependent on the factual available data at the time.
This option fulfils the criteria of assessment against the factors, was supported through the community consultation process, and may be considered as a viable proposal to the LGAB.
Amended Option 6 of the Discussion Paper - Consisting of Seven Wards
This option (Attachment 6) proposes seven Wards with an even distribution of two Councillor representatives. There are two suburbs – Marangaroo and Clarkson - that are split across Wards.
The projected Councillor:Elector ratio forecast is:
|
2020 |
Projected electors 2024 |
Projected electors 2028 |
||||||||
|
Ward |
No of Cllrs |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per councillor |
% ratio deviation |
No of electors |
Electors per Cllr |
% ratio deviation |
|
1 |
2 |
19566 |
9783 |
8.87% |
19612 |
9806 |
3.10% |
19698 |
9849 |
-6.77% |
|
2 |
2 |
19123 |
9562 |
6.40% |
19960 |
9980 |
4.93% |
20938 |
10469 |
-0.90% |
|
3 |
2 |
17914 |
8957 |
-0.32% |
18812 |
9406 |
-1.11% |
22129 |
11064 |
4.73% |
|
4 |
2 |
18682 |
9341 |
3.95% |
19688 |
9844 |
3.50% |
20895 |
10448 |
-1.10% |
|
5 |
2 |
17283 |
8642 |
-3.83% |
17770 |
8885 |
-6.59% |
18625 |
9312 |
-11.85% |
|
6 |
2 |
16270 |
8135 |
-9.47% |
16964 |
8482 |
-10.82% |
18131 |
9066 |
-14.19% |
|
7 |
2 |
16966 |
8483 |
-5.60% |
20351 |
10175 |
6.98% |
27482 |
13741 |
30.07% |
|
Total |
14 |
125804 |
8986 |
133156 |
9511 |
|
147897 |
10564 |
|
|
As with the option for six Wards, any future potential review is dependent on actual growth, rather than the assumed growth used for these predications, and real data would need to be analysed closer to the year of assumed deviation.
This option fulfils the criteria of assessment against the factors, was supported through the community consultation process, and may be considered as a viable proposal to the LGAB.
Naming of the Wards
Clause 2.3 of Schedule 2.2 of the Act provides that if a local government proposes under Schedule 2.2 that an order be made changing the name of the District or a Ward, the Minister may recommend to the Governor that the order be made, and the Governor may make the order accordingly. The Minister can only make a recommendation under subsection (3) if the Board has recommended under Schedule 2.2 that the order in question should be made.
The City’s current Ward names are based on geographical location being - North Coast, Central and South Wards. When submitting a proposal to the LGAB, the Council should consider an agreed preference for the naming of the Wards. Ward names may be considered in the context of:
· A predominant location or feature of the Ward;
· Aboriginal connection;
· Heritage;
· Geographical location; or
· Any other factor that Council Members consider relevant.
It is important to note that, to date, the naming of Wards has not gone through any consultation process and no community submissions received referenced suggestions to naming Wards.
In selecting Ward names that may be quite different to the principle of the existing geographical Ward names, it would be recommended that an appropriate level of community engagement occur. This would include, but not be limited to, inviting comments/ suggestions from the community at large, liaison with the City’s existing Committee/ Working/ Advisory Groups (as appropriate) and further discussion with Council Members. Should Council Members wish to change the Ward naming principle and undertake further engagement, then it is recommended that Council consider a review of Ward names at a future date. Such a review could be undertaken at any time through Council resolution and the review may be subject to the same requirements as the current review, including a minimum consultation period.
Should Council Members be supportive of progressing with a proposal having Ward names based on the current geographical principle, then the following options are recommended:
Three Wards – No change to Ward names.
Six Wards – North-East Ward, North-West Ward, Central-East Ward, Central-West Ward, South-East Ward, South-West Ward.
Seven Wards – North Ward, North-East Ward, Central-East Ward, Central-West Ward, Central Ward, South-West Ward, South Ward.
The maps within the Attachments 3 to 6, display these recommended Ward names.
In addition, Schedule 4.2 of the Act provides that if a district is divided into Wards, as near as practicable to ½ of the Councillors representing each Ward are to retire every two years in an Election year. Where it is not possible to have an even number by Wards, then as near as practical to half the number of Councillors from the whole District are to retire every two years.
Precise outcomes will depend on which option Council decides to put to the LGAB but as an overall principal the LGAB has a preference for Councillors to see out their terms and use vacancies that occur normally to phase in any changes that may be required. In this respect it is highly likely that the LGAB will allocate those seven Councillors whose terms do not expire until 2023 to a new ward in consultation with the Councillors affected wherever possible (and where agreement is not possible, the LGAB will decide), and will use the seven vacancies that arise in 2023 to bring about the changes required.
Statutory Compliance
The process for reviewing wards and representation is set out in Section 2.2 and Schedule 2.2 of the Act.
The City has complied with the requirements of the Act in undertaking the review.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
For the LGAB to consider proposals in time for the 2021 Election, a proposal must be submitted to the LGAB by the City, no later than 31 January 2021.
Wherever possible, any changes approved by the Minister will be in place for the next ordinary Election. It is also possible that any recommended change could take effect from either the 2021 or 2023 local government elections, as this is ultimately a decision of the LGAB in making a recommendation to the Minister.
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to support existing management systems.
This proposal aligns with the Civic Leadership objective of the existing Strategic Community Plan; Council should therefore, consider the following risk appetite statement:
Civic Leadership – 4.2 Good Governance
The City provides appropriate systems and processes to realise its values and achieve good governance. Decisions are aligned to policy to ensure non-compliance impacts are reduced as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and reputational damage is restricted to low. Therefore, the City accepts low or ALARP of compliance and governance risk.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
There are sufficient existing operational funds to cover costs associated with this review, including consultancy.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcomes of the community consultation and modelling options for the review of Wards and Representation 2020;
2. BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY RECOMMENDS, to the Local Government Advisory Board as per Clause 9 of Schedule 2.2 of the Local Government Act 1995, the making of an order under sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.18 of the Local Government Act 1995 to change the wards and representation of the City of Wanneroo to consist of seven ward boundaries as shown on the map included in Attachment 6 to this report as follows:
a) Establish a North Ward with two Councillors;
b) Establish a North-East Ward with two Councillors;
c) Establish a Central-East Ward with two Councillors;
d) Establish a Central-West Ward with two Councillors;
e) Establish a Central Ward with two Councillors;
f) Establish a South- West Ward with two Councillors;
g) Establish a South Ward with two Councillors;
3. REQUESTS the Local Government Advisory Board that these changes be implemented for the 2021 Local Government Elections, and that Councillors whose terms expire in 2023 be allocated equally to the proposed new Wards.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Final - Community Consultation - Discussion Paper - 2020 Review of Ward Boundaries and Representation |
20/417848 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Summary of Comments from Community |
20/512983 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Option with 3 wards and no change |
20/509629 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Option with 3 wards and adjusted representation |
20/509684 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Option with 6 wards |
20/512660 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Option with 7 wards |
20/541067 |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 523
Chief Executive Office
3.22 City of Wanneroo Submission - Proposed Local Government (Model Code of Conduct) Regulations 2020
File Ref: 30736V03 – 20/525578
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments:
Issue
To consider the City of Wanneroo’s (the City) response to the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (the Department) request for feedback on the draft Local Government (Model Code of Conduct) Regulations 2020 (the Regulations) as set out in Attachment 2.
Background
On 27 June 2019, the Local Government Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Amendment Act) was passed in Parliament, which introduced a mandatory Code of Conduct for Council Members, committee members and candidates but does not apply to City employees. The Amendment Act provides a separate requirement for the CEO to implement an employee Code of Conduct in line with a model that is yet to be released by the Department.
The Amendment Act inserts the following provisions into the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) which have yet to be proclaimed:-
“50. Sections 5.103 and 5.104 replaced Delete sections 5.103 and 5.104 and insert:
5.103. Model code of conduct for Council Members, committee members and candidates
(1) Regulations must prescribe a model code of conduct for Council Members, committee members and candidates.
(2) The model code of conduct must include —
(a) general principles to guide behaviour; and
(b) requirements relating to behaviour; and
(c) provisions specified to be rules of conduct.
(3) The model code of conduct may include provisions about how the following are to be dealt with —
(a) alleged breaches of the requirements referred to in subsection (2)(b);
(b) alleged breaches of the rules of conduct by committee members.
(4) The model code of conduct cannot include a rule of conduct if contravention of the rule would, in addition to being a minor breach under section 5.105(1)(a), also be a serious breach under section 5.105(3).
(5) Regulations may amend the model code of conduct.
5.104. Adoption of model code of conduct
(1) Within 3 months after the day on which regulations prescribing the model code come into operation, a local government must prepare and adopt* a code of conduct to be observed by Council Members, committee members and candidates that incorporates the model code.
* Absolute majority required.
(2) Within 3 months after the day on which regulations amending the model code come into operation, the local government must amend* the adopted code of conduct to incorporate the amendments made to the model code.
(3) A local government may include in the adopted code of conduct requirements in addition to the requirements referred to in section 5.103(2)(b), but any additional requirements —
(a) can only be expressed to apply to Council Members or committee members; and
(b) are of no effect to the extent that they are inconsistent with the model code.
(4) A local government cannot include in the adopted code of conduct provisions in addition to the principles referred to in section 5.103(2)(a) or the rules of conduct.
(5) The model code is taken to be a local government’s adopted code of conduct until the local government adopts a code of conduct.
(6) An alleged breach of a local government’s adopted code of conduct by a candidate cannot be dealt with under this Division or the adopted code of conduct unless the candidate has been elected as a Council Member.
(7) The CEO must publish an up-to-date version of a local government’s adopted code of conduct on the local government’s official website.
51. Section 5.105 amended - Delete section 5.105(1) and insert:
(1) A Council Member commits a minor breach if the Council Member —
a) contravenes a rule of conduct; or
b) contravenes a local law under this Act, contravention of which the regulations specify to be a minor breach.
(1A) Subsection (1) extends to the contravention of a rule of conduct that occurred when the Council Member was a candidate.
(1B) Regulations cannot specify that contravention of a local law under this Act is a minor breach if contravention of the local law would, in addition to being a minor breach under subsection (1), also be a serious breach under subsection (3).
Detail
The mandatory model Code of Conduct (the Code) will be a departure from the present legislative form that separates Codes of Conduct and the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 (Rules of Conduct). The Rules of Conduct are proposed to be repealed and the provisions captured within the draft Regulations and Model Code of Conduct.
Council is to note the requirement for local governments to determine behavioural breach allegations specified under Division 3 of the Draft Regulations. Division 3 includes provisions on how to manage complaints and local governments will be required to adopt their own procedures for dealing with complaints under this Division to the extent that they are not provided for in clause 11 of the Code.
The proposed requirement as outlined above is contrary to the City’s previous submissions in relation to complaints management and determination, and is contrary to recommendations from the City of Perth Inquiry and the Local Government Act Review Panel, both of which recommend an independent investigative body to investigate and determine complaints and allegations of breach.
The process for determining complaints under the Rules of Conduct provisions are now captured under Division 4 of the Code and remain the same with minor breach complaints to be determined by the Standards Panel.
The Amendment Act requires that local governments adopt the Code within three months of the amendments taking effect. Until the Code is adopted, the model Code applies.
The draft Model Code of Conduct as proposed is constructed in three Parts:-
Part A – Principles [Section 5.103(2)(a)]
Part B – Behaviour [Section 5.103(2)(b)]
Part C – Rules of Conduct [Section 5.103(2)(c)]
While local governments are not able to amend Part A or Part C, additional behaviours can be included in Part B that are not inconsistent with the Code.
In considering additional behaviours, Council may give consideration to behaviours that are not currently represented in the Code that it considers are important. This may include introducing a dress standard for members or use of technology, for example.
To adopt the Code, a resolution passed by an absolute majority is required. Once the Code is adopted, it must be published on the local government’s official website.
Regulation 9 of the Rules of Conduct Regulations – Disallowance of Amendment
Council Members are to note that the Legislative Council disallowed the amendment to Regulation 9 which removed the ability for a council or a CEO to authorise a Council Member to undertake a task that contributes to the administration of the local government.
The proposed amendment was intended to provide additional clarification about the roles and responsibilities of local government Council Members and administrative staff, ensuring that regulation 9 accurately reflected the provisions of the Act.
The decision by the Legislative Council means that on 11 November, regulation 9 reverts back to the previous version Gazetted in 2007.
The Department has not released an amended version of the Regulations to account for the disallowance and in light of this, the City again sought an extension from the Department to the deadline date for submissions however this has not been forthcoming.
The Regulations
Part A
The principles outlined in Part A are overarching behaviours that Council Members, Committee Members and candidates must take into consideration in their role as public representatives, or potential public representatives. These are not dissimilar to those enacted through the current Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007.
Part B
Part B sets out the standards of behaviour which enable and empower Council Members to meet the principles outlined in Part A. Behaviour is expected to be managed at the local level by the local government, so Part B also deals with how complaints are to be managed.
Failure to comply with this Part may give rise to a complaint against a Council Member’s conduct, followed by a subsequent investigation and possible corrective action by the local government. The emphasis should be on an educative role to establish sound working relationships and avoid repeated breaches, rather than punishment.
Local governments are responsible for taking action against alleged breaches under Part B. Local governments are to establish procedures on how complaints are going to be handled or managed to the extent that they are not already proposed under clause 11 of the Code.
Part C
Part C deals with Rules of Conduct breaches.
Alleged breaches of this part can be referred to the Local Government Standards Panel (Standards Panel) in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act). A breach of this Part is a “minor breach”. In the event the Standards Panel makes a finding of breach against a Council Member, sanctions will be imposed in accordance with the Part 5 Division 9 of the Act.
Nothing in this part removes the obligations placed upon Council Members and employees (including the CEO) of the local government under the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003.
The process for complaints under Part C is outlined in the Act. Complaints in the first instance are directed to the complaints officer at the local government. The Act provides that the complaints officer is the CEO or another officer with delegated responsibility.
Consultation
In November 2015, the Department released a consultation paper on a review of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 and the minor breach disciplinary framework. At that time the proposed changes to the current disciplinary framework was intended to:
· Empower local government to better manage the risk of misconduct;
· Establish a more pro-active complaints management culture; and
· Streamline and simplify the process of dealing with complaints that allege low-level misconduct or that are trivial or vexatious.
WALGA actively engaged with the Department and conducted extensive consultation in conjunction with the sector and LG Professionals over a number of years, leading to promulgation of the Local Government (Official Conduct) Amendment Act 2007, amending the Act to introduce minor, serious and recurrent breach allegation complaint processes, and the commencement in October 2007 of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations (’the Regulations’).
In October 2019, the Department released a consultation paper on the mandatory Code of Conduct and received over 400 submissions (which included the CEO’ Standards for Recruitment and Selection, Performance and Termination).
Whilst the City of Wanneroo did not develop and submit a specific response to the Discussion Paper circulated in November 2019, it considered and responded to proposed legislative change in this area through its submissions on Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Local Government Act 1995 review process.
Comment
The purpose of this Code of Conduct (Code) is to guide the decisions, actions and behaviours of Council Members, committee members and candidates running for election.
As an elected representative, Council Members have role (as part of Council) to govern the affairs and are responsible for the performance of their local government. To do this, Council Members must demonstrate professional and ethical behaviour to build and strengthen trust in their communities. In addition, a person who has nominated to be a Council Member is also required to demonstrate professional and ethical behaviour during the election campaign.
The submission period deadline set by the Department does not provide an opportunity for Administration to present a draft submission for consideration by Council. WALGA, LG Professionals and City Administration have all advocated for an extension to the deadline date however, the Department has reaffirmed all submissions are to be received by 6 December 2020.
The draft submission is set out in Attachment 1 for consideration by Council, noting that it has previously been provided to Council Members under a Briefing Note dated 13 November 2020. The draft submission provides references to WALGA and LG Professionals previous submissions or advocacy positions along with previous comments made by the City. The draft submission includes comments from Administration on the Regulations and Model Code.
The
draft submission has been sent to WALGA and the Department to meet the
6 December 2020 deadline with the disclaimer that whilst Council Members had
been consulted, the submission will only be considered and adopted by Council
at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 14 December 2020.
Statutory Compliance
Local Government Legislation Amendment Act 2019: Sections 5.103 and 5.104 replaced.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The draft Regulations require that Council will be required to adopt a policy to document the procedure to follow when receiving complaints about Council Member behaviour under Division 3 of the Model Code of Conduct and any possible sanctions.
Financial Implications
The City has previously advocated for a change to the fees charged by the Standards Panel in regard to the consideration of Minor Breach complaints. The Department has made no amendments to the fee structure or to whom is responsible for the fees, noting that currently the local government incurs and is responsible for all the fees for the Standards Panel to consider a complaint.
Further, the City would be solely responsible for the cost to engage independent investigators to investigate and report on complaints and allegations of breach in respect of Part B.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. ENDORSES the City of Wanneroo’s submission (as set out in Attachment 1) in response to the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries request for feedback on the draft Local Government (Model Code of Conduct) Amendment Regulations 2020; and
2. NOTES that Administration has provided the draft submission to the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries and the Western Australian Local Government Association in respect of 1 above in order to meet the 6 December 2020 deadline subject to Council’s endorsement at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 14 December 2020.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Model Code of Conduct Submission November 2020 |
20/496373 |
Minuted |
|
2⇩. |
Local Government (Model Code of Conduct) Amendment Regulations 2020 |
20/508292 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 564
File Ref: 7312V04 – 20/527397
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee) to adopt the revised Committee Terms of Reference (ToR) in accordance with the Local Government (Audit) Regulation 1996 (the Regulations) and Local Government Amendment (Auditing) Act 2017 as presented and recommended by the Audit and Risk Committee on Tuesday 1 December 2020.
Background
The ToR has been revised in accordance with the updated Strategic Three Year Internal Audit Plan (IAP) which was endorsed by Council on 20 October 2020 and City’s updated policy and procedures. The main consideration in the ToR is to align the Internal Audit Log reporting with the IAP and to include reference to the role of the in respect of the City’s Fraud and misconduct Control and Resilience Framework.
A review of the ToR was previously presented to the Committee in March 2020 and adopted by Council in May 2020.
The further revised ToR was presented to Committee Terms on 1 December 2020, which was noted and recommended to Council for adoption as follows:
“That Audit and Risk Committee:
1. NOTES the amendments to the Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference, as detailed in Attachment 1; and
2. RECOMMENDS to Council to adopt the amended Terms of Reference, as set out in attachment 1.”
Detail
The proposed amendments are set out in the following sections of the ToR and include:
Section 7 Duties and Responsibilities – Internal Audit Log Reporting
To oversee Implementation and progress of the Internal Audit recommendations outlined in the City’s Internal Audit reported on a biannual basis.
Section 7 Duties and Responsibilities – Fraud and Misconduct Control and Resilience Framework
Oversight of risk management including, fraud, misconduct and corruption control.
Review the City’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework for identifying, monitoring and managing business risk, including risks associated with fraud, misconduct and corruption.
Review the Strategic Internal Audit Plan annually to ensure it covers fraud, misconduct and corruption risks.
Marked-up revisions to the existing ToR are set out in in Attachment 1.
The Committee recommends Council adopt the revised TOR as set out in Attachment 2.
Consultation
The revised ToR has been redrafted in consultation with the City’s Internal Auditors (William Buck) and respective Managers in October 2020 to consider the merits of alternative practices.
Comment
The review of the ToR provides the opportunity to review the structure and operation of the Committee to further enhance the oversite and scrutiny of the City’s operations.
The updated details to the ToR are set out in this report and were presented to the Audit and Risk Committee on 1 December 2020 for consideration. The Audit and Risk Committee has recommended for Council to endorse the updated Terms of Reference in Attachment 1.
Statutory Compliance
The ToR has been reviewed to ensure conformance with the Act Division 1A [7.1A] and clause 16 and 17 of the Regulations.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.3 Progressive Organisation
4.3.1 Lead excellence and innovation in local government”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O16 Risk Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issues contained within this report has been identified within the City’s corporate risk register which is reviewed and monitored bi-annually in accordance with the City’s reporting requirements.
Reviewing and updating the ToR will reduce the relevant compliance risks and further enhance the Committee's governance and oversight of the City's operations.
The City places a high priority on the importance of maintaining good governance and under the Civic Leadership objective of the existing Strategic Community Plan, Council should consider the following risk appetite statement:
Good Governance – the City accepts low or As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) of compliance and governance risk.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee and ADOPTS the revised and updated Terms of Reference of the Audit and Risk Committee as set out in Attachment 2.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Terms of Reference Audit and Risk Committee November 2020_Mark up |
20/540165 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Terms of Reference Audit and Risk Committee November 2020 |
19/265363[v2] |
Minuted |
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 578
File Ref: 2286 – 20/532960
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee) to note the new high rated Corporate Risk CO-O26 Heritage in the City’s Corporate Risk Register Profile.
Background
Corporate risks are managed by Administration and reviewed on a bi-annual basis. The updated Corporate Risk Profile is provided to the Committee for information only and to note any High or Extreme risks in accordance with the Committee’s Terms of Reference.
The Committee refers to Council to note any risks rated High or Extreme in accordance with the City’s Enterprise Risk Management framework.
Detail
The City’s Corporate Risk Profile contains key operational risks that are systemic across the City’s Directorates which can potentially impact the City’s operations and may affect the achievement of the Corporate Business Plan (CBP). These risks are monitored and managed by Administration through regular identification, profiling, assessment, action planning and systematic review.
On 22 October 2020 Administration undertook a review of the Corporate Risk Profile using the recently adopted Risk assessment criteria. A new Corporate risk was identified during this review as follows:
CO-O26 Heritage
The risk description is lack of appropriate management leads to damage to or loss of Aboriginal or European heritage. The details for causes, consequences, preventative and mitigating controls have been populated and this risk was rated as a Moderate consequence and Likelihood of likely, therefore the overall residual risk rating is High.
In summary, there are now 21 corporate risks, which have been captured within the City’s Corporate Risk profile which are rated as follows:
|
0 Extreme |
1 High |
11 Moderate |
9 Low |
Responsible officers will continue to monitor all corporate risks to ensure actions are progressing to manage and mitigate any potential exposure to avoid or minimise any impact to the City.
Consultation
Administration is responsible for the ongoing review and management of corporate risks.
In accordance with the Committee’s Terms of Reference, the Committee reviews any Corporate Risk rated as High or Extreme.
Comment
The review session primarily focused on the detail currently set out within the Corporate Risk Register in relation to the specified controls, the effectiveness of those controls and evidence to support those controls such as documented processes, policies and framework references.
Action plans are in place to manage and monitor these risks with regular follow-up and progress updates being provided by respective risk and action owners. Currently there are no corporate risks rated as extreme and there is one corporate risk rated as High set out in the table below:-
|
Risk Title |
Risk Description |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O26 Heritage |
Lack of appropriate management leads to damage to or loss of Aboriginal or European heritage |
High |
At its meeting on 1 December 2020, the Committee considered the City’s Corporate Risk Profile and risk rated as High set out above. The Committee recommends Council note the new Corporate Risk rated as High.
Statutory Compliance
Implementation of Risk Management at the strategic, corporate and operational levels will assist the City to embed effective systems and processes for risk management in line with the requirements of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O16 Risk Management |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
The content of this report relates to the Risk Management risk, which has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to build on the existing management systems. This includes on-going risk review and reporting as part of the monitoring process which aligns with the Civic Leadership objective of the existing Strategic Community plan, the committee should therefore consider the following risk appetite statement:
The City’s defined risk appetite for 4.2 Good Governance is Governance impacts are prioritised above all other relevant consequence considerations, and these will be reduced to “as Low as Reasonably Practicable” (ALARP). Therefore, the City accepts low or ALARP of compliance and governance risk.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the recommendation to the Audit and Risk Committee and NOTES the new Corporate Risk CO-O26 Heritage rated High to the City’s Corporate Risk Profile.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 585
3.25 Tender 20189 for the Provision of Internal Audit Services for a Period of Three Financial Years
File Ref: 40107 – 20/527887
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee (the Committee) to accept Tender No. 20189 from William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd (William Buck) for the provision of Internal audit Services for an initial period of three financial years commencing from 14 January 2021 with the option to extend the contract for a further two twelve month periods as presented and recommended by the Audit and Risk Committee on 1 December 2020.
Background
The current Internal Audit Services contract with William Buck commenced on 14 October 2015 for a period of three years and expired on 13 July 2018. The first 12-month extension of the contract was noted by the Committee on 28 August 2018 and the final 12-month extension was noted by the Committee on 14 May 2019 which expired on 13 July 2020.
At the Committee meeting on 17 March 2020, Administration informed the Committee of the intention to commence the procurement process for the Internal Audit Services through public tender. However, due to COVID-19 Pandemic, it was recommended that the procurement process for the Provision of Internal Audit Services be deferred until September/ October 2020. To bridge the gap, the CEO’s exemption a procurement exemption and approved a short term contract for a 6-month term with William Buck to continue providing internal audit services commencing on 14 July 2020 and is due to expire on 13 January 2021.
On 29 September 2020, Administration informed the Committee of its intention to call for public tenders prior to the expiration of the current Internal Audit Services contract.
Details of the consideration including objectives, proposed areas for future audits in developing the scope and selection criteria for the proposed tender were provided to the Committee on 29 September 2020.
At its meeting on 1 December 2020, the Committee considered the evaluation process for Tender 20189 and resolved the following:
“That the Audit and Risk Committee RECOMMENDS that Council ACCEPTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY Tender No. 20189 from William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd for the provision of Internal Audit Services for an initial period of three financial years commencing from 14 January 2021 with the option to extend the contract for a further two twelve month periods at the discretion of Council.”
Detail
Tender No. 20189 for Internal Audit Services was advertised on 3 October 2020 and closed on 27 October 2020.
At the close of tender, the City received five submissions from the following firms:
1. Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Crowe Australasia);
2. Paxon Business and Financial Services Pty Ltd (Paxon);
3. Moore Australia (WA) Pty Ltd (Moore);
4. William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd (William Buck); and
5. AMW Anderson Munro & Wylie (Audit) Pty Ltd (Anderson).
The Tender Evaluation Panel (TEP) comprised:
· Executive Manager Governance & Legal – Chairperson, Non-voting Member
· Project Manager Finance – Voting Member excluding OSH
· Enterprise Risk Specialist – Voting Member
· Audit and Assurance Officer – Voting Member
Oversight to the tender assessment process was provided by the City’s Contracts Officer.
Tender submissions were evaluated in accordance with the Procurement and Evaluation Plan (PEP) which included the following selection criteria:
|
|
Criteria |
Weight |
|
1 |
Sustainable (Corporate Social Responsibility) Procurement: a) Environmental Considerations 5% b) Buy Local 10% c) Reconciliation Action Plan 2.5% d) Disability Access & Inclusion 2.5% |
20% |
|
2 |
*OSH |
5% |
|
3 |
*Experience, Qualifications and Accreditations |
45% |
|
4 |
*Availability and Capacity to complete services within time frame |
30% |
|
|
TOTAL |
100% |
Pricing is not included in the qualitative criteria but is considered as part of the overall Value for Money (VFM) assessment.
Tenderers must achieve a minimum acceptable qualitative score (as determined by the City) and for each of the qualitative criteria detailed above (*) to be considered for further evaluation.
Evaluation Criteria 1 – Sustainable (Corporate Social Responsibility) Procurement (20%)
Evidence of Sustainable (Corporate Social Responsibility) Procurement was assessed based on the tenderers’ responses provided within the Questionnaires set out in Schedules 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D that were included in the tender documentation.
Sub-criteria a) Environmental Considerations (5%)
The City is committed to procuring foods and services that have the most positive environmental, social and economic impacts over the entire life cycle of a product or service. An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on tenderers’ Environmental policy and practices.
Sub-criteria b) Buy Local (10%)
The City encourages the development of competitive local businesses within the geographical boundaries of the City first and secondly within the broader region. An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the responses provided, but not limited to the following commitment:
· Purchasing locally made and sourced goods/services;
· Inviting local businesses to participate in quotation, tender and expressions of interest opportunities;
· Providing an advantage to businesses based within the City’s boundaries;
· Providing an advantage to businesses which can demonstrate economic benefit to the City’s community such as employing local residents/sub-contractors and/or purchasing goods/services from local providers.
Sub-criteria c) Reconciliation Action Plan (2.5%)
An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the responses provided that relate to:
· Relationships – building positive relationships between indigenous and non-indigenous people;
· Respect – recognising the contribution of Indigenous people to Australia and learning more about the history, culture and diversity in a two-way communication process;
· Opportunities – attracting, developing and retaining organisational talent to build opportunities for aboriginal employment, training, and development and mentoring.
Sub-criteria d) Disability Access & Inclusion (2.5%)
An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the responses provided that relate to:
· People with disabilities have the same buildings and facilities access opportunities as other people;
· People with disabilities receive information in a format that will enable them to access information as readily as other people are able to access it;
· People with disabilities receive the same level and quality of service from staff as other people receive;
· People with disabilities have the same opportunities as other people to make complaints;
· People with disabilities have the same opportunities as other people to participate in any employment opportunities.
The combined assessment of responses provided by the tenderers for sub-criterions a, b, c and d of the Sustainable (Corporate Social responsibility) Procurement criterion resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck |
1 |
|
Paxon |
2 |
|
Crowe |
3 |
|
Moore |
4 |
|
Anderson |
5 |
Evaluation Criteria 2 – Occupational Health and Safety (OSH) (5%)
The assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ responses to the Occupational Health and Safety Management System Questionnaire included in the tender documentation, OSH Policy
Based on the responses provided by the tenderers the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck |
1 |
|
Moore |
2 |
|
Paxon |
3 |
|
Crowe |
4 |
|
Anderson |
5 |
The top two tenderers achieved the acceptable minimum score for this criterion.
Evaluation Criteria 3 – Experience, Qualifications and Accreditations (45%)
The tenderers’ relevant experience, qualifications and accreditations as set out in their respective tender submissions were assessed in order to evaluate their ability and credentials to meet the requirements of the contract.
The assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ previous and current experience in respect to the scoped Internal Audit Services and experience in providing similar Services to local governments, particularly in Western Australia.
Based on the responses provided by the tenderers, the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck |
1 |
|
Moore |
2 |
|
Crowe |
3 |
|
Paxon |
4 |
|
Anderson |
5 |
The top four tenderers achieved an acceptable minimum score for this criterion.
Evaluation Criteria 4 – Availability and Capacity to complete services within timeframe (30%)
The assessment of this criterion considered the tenderers’ team structure, resources, and their experience including continuing availability of resources. Proposed work plan and methodology including communication plan, quality assurance and proposed deliverables were also being assessed as part of this criterion.
A review of the documentation submitted showed the tenderers have various levels of resources available to service the contract and the experiences of the resources were also considered.
Based on the response provided by the tenderers, the assessment of this criterion has resulted in the following ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck |
1 |
|
Crowe |
2 |
|
Moore |
3 |
|
Paxon |
4 |
|
Anderson |
5 |
All tenderers achieved an acceptable minimum score for this criterion.
Overall Weighted Assessment and Ranking
Tenderers’ submissions were evaluated in accordance with the Procurement and Evaluation Plan.
The overall qualitative weighted assessment resulted in the following tenderer ranking:
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck* |
1 |
|
Moore* |
2 |
|
Crowe |
3 |
|
Paxon |
4 |
|
Anderson |
5 |
*The top two tenderers achieved an acceptable minimum score for the mandatory qualitative evaluation criteria and progressed to the VFM assessment stage of the assessment process.
Value for Money Assessment
An assessment was made to determine the ranking based on the blended rate pricing provided within the tenders’ documentation, resulting in the following tenderer ranking (Highest to Lowest):
|
Tenderer |
Ranking |
|
William Buck |
1 |
|
Moore |
2 |
Consultation
Administration consulted with the Contracts and Procurement Team in the preparation of and in undertaking this tender process.
Comment
The City currently has capacity to conduct internal audits either in-house or via external contract for the Internal Audit Services. There are significant benefits for the City to continue with a blended model with an in-house dedicated auditor and to contract with an external provider, especially as the City’s in-house dedicated auditor only has limited capacity to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes across the City. Developing and maintaining a strong relationship with an independent internal audit service provider would assist in building in-house expertise, improve capacity for the City and maintain a stronger level of independence in delivering the Internal Audit Services and the related control programs.
The details of the Internal Audit services tender evaluation as set out in this report was presented to the Committee on 1 December 2020 for consideration. The Committee recommended that Council accept the tender from William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd for the provision of Internal Audit Services.
Statutory Compliance
Whilst there is no statutory requirement for a local government to contract an external provider for internal audit services, the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 prescribe the need for regular review of the effectiveness of systems and processes relating to risk, internal controls and legislative compliance. The use of mixed service delivery model will provide the City with the capacity to achieve this.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O08 Contract Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
|
|
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
The Internal Audit Log assists Administration to monitor implementation of the proposed actions, which contributes in improving internal controls and reducing the risks identified through internal audits, hence providing good governance and oversight.
The City places a high priority on the importance of maintaining good governance and under the Civic Leadership objective of the existing Strategic Community plan should consider the following risk appetite statement:
Good Governance
The City accepts low or As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) of compliance and governance risk
Policy Implications
Tenders were invited in accordance with the City’s Purchasing Policy.
Financial Implications
The cost to the City for the Internal Audit services will be met from the City’s operating budget for the Services.
A financial assessment of William Buck was not undertaken as William Buck is a supplier on the WALGA Audit and Compliance Preferred Supplier Panel and payments will only be made on satisfactory provision of the services.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:
1. ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee and ACCEPTS Tender No. 20189 from William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd for the provision of Internal Audit Services for an initial period of three financial years commencing from 14 January 2021 with the option to extend the contract for a further two twelve month periods at the discretion of Council; and
2. APPOINTS, BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd to provide Internal Audit Services to the City on the terms and for the period set out in 1 above.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 December, 2020 587
Item 4 Motions on Notice
Item 5 Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
5.1 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 30 November 2020
5.2 Terms of Reference - Quinns Rocks Caravan Park Redevelopment Community Advisory Group
Item 7 Confidential
Nil
The next Briefing Session has been scheduled for 6:00pm on Tuesday, 9 February 2020, to be held in the Council Chamber (Level 1), 23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
