BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Council Chambers (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
on 08 June, 2021 commencing at 6:00pm
BRIEFING PAPERS
FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS’
BRIEFING SESSION
Draft Only
to be held at
the Council Chambers (Level 1), Civic Centre,
23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo
on 08 June, 2021 commencing at 6:00pm
PROCEDURE FOR FULL COUNCIL BRIEFING SESSION
COVID-19 Pandemic Situation
The City of Wanneroo is committed to ensuring the safety of all attendees at public meetings. Therefore, social distancing will be applied in the Council Chambers in accordance with State Government Regulations.
The capacity of the Council Chambers is restricted under these conditions and should the maximum capacity of the Chambers be exceeded, additional seating will be available in an alternative room to enable all public attendees to listen live to the audio (only) of the meeting (no video is available). Should the maximum capacity be exceeded, you may be asked to attend the alternative room and may not be able to enter the Chambers as required by current State Government Regulations.
Thank you for your understanding of these circumstances.
PRINCIPLES
A Council Briefing occurs a week prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting and provides an opportunity for Council Members to ask questions and clarify issues relevant to the specific agenda items before council. The Briefing is not a decision-making forum and the Council has no power to make decisions. The Briefing Session will not be used, except in an emergency, as a venue or forum through which to invoke the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and call a Special Meeting of Council.
In order to ensure full transparency the meetings will be open to the public to observe the process. Where matters are of a confidential nature, they will be deferred to the conclusion of the Briefing and at that point, the Briefing Session closed to the public. The reports provided are the Officers’ professional opinions. Whilst it is acknowledged that Council Members may raise issues that have not been considered in the formulation of the report and recommendation, it is a basic principle that as part of the Briefing Sessions Council Members cannot direct Officers to change their reports or recommendations.
PROCESS
The Briefing Session will commence at 6.00pm and will be chaired by the Mayor or in his/her absence the Deputy Mayor. In the absence of both, Councillors will elect a Chairperson from amongst those present. In general, the Standing Orders Local Law 2008 will apply, EXCEPT THAT Council Members may speak more than once on any item, there is no moving or seconding items, Officer’s will address the Council Members and the order of business will be as follows:
Members of the public present may observe the process and there is an opportunity at the conclusion of the Briefing for a Public Question Time where members of the public may ask questions (no statements) relating only to the business on the Agenda. The Agenda will take the form of:
· Attendance and Apologies
· Declarations of Interest
· Reports for discussion
· Tabled Items
· Public Question Time
· Closure
Where an interest is involved in relation to an item, the same procedure which applies to Ordinary Council Meetings will apply. It is a breach of the City’s Code of Conduct for an interest to not be declared. The Briefing Session will consider items on the Agenda only and proceed to deal with each item as they appear. The process will be for the Mayor to call each item number in sequence and ask for questions. Where there are no questions regarding the item, the Briefing will proceed to the next item.
AGENDA CONTENTS
While every endeavour is made to ensure that all items to be presented to Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting are included in the Briefing Session papers, it should be noted that there will be occasions when, due to necessity, items will not be ready in time for the Briefing Session and will go straight to the full Council Agenda as a matter for decision. Further, there will be occasions when items are TABLED at the Briefing Session rather than the full report being provided in advance. In these instances, staff will endeavour to include the item on the Agenda as a late item, noting that a report will be tabled at the agenda Briefing Session.
AGENDA DISTRIBUTION
The Council Briefing Session Agenda will be distributed to Council Members on the FRIDAY prior to the Council Briefing Session. Copies will be made on the City’s website for interested members of the public. Spare Briefing Session papers will be available at the Briefing Session for interested members of the public.
RECORD OF BRIEFING
The formal record of the Council Briefing Session will be limited to notes regarding any agreed action to be taken by staff or Council Members. No recommendations will be included and the notes will be retained for reference and are not distributed to Council Members or the public.
LOCATION
The Council Briefing Session will take place in the Council Chamber at the Civic Centre.
DEPUTATIONS
The procedure for Deputations has changed for 2021 to allow Deputations to be presented during the Briefing Session.
During the Briefing Session, members of the public may, by appointment, present a Deputation relating to items on the current Briefing Session Agenda. A maximum of up to ten minutes (dependent on the number of deputations received) is permitted for each deputation with up to three people to address the Council Members.
Please note that Deputation requests are to be received by no later than 9:00am on the day of the Briefing Session, and must relate to an item on the current Briefing Session Agenda.
Please note:
· Deputation requests must relate to items listed on the current Briefing Session Agenda;
· A Deputation is not to exceed three speakers in number and only those speakers may address the Council Members; and
· Speakers of a Deputation will collectively have a maximum of up to 10 minutes (dependent on the number of deputations received) to address the Council Members, unless an extension of time is granted.
Please ensure mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber.
For further information please contact Council Support on 9405 5000.
Briefing Papers for Tuesday 8 June, 2021
CONTENTS
Item 2_____ Apologies and Leave of Absence
Planning & Development Services
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
4.2 Consideration of Actions Relating to Developer Contribution Arrangements
4.3 Close of Advertising - Annual Review of Cell Costs for Cells 1-9 (2020-2021)
4.4 Review of Local Planning Policy 4.6: Signs
4.6 Council Policy Review - Local Area Traffic Management Policy
4.7 Council Policy Review - Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy
4.8 Council Policy Review - Pathways Policy
4.9 Fragola Park, Landsdale - Community Engagement Outcomes
Community Safety & Emergency Management Report
4.10 Frederick Stubbs Gate Closure Time Review
Corporate Strategy & Performance
4.11 Financial Activity Statement for the period ended 30 April 2021
4.12 Strategic Community Plan 2021-31
4.13 Warrant of Payments for the Period to 30 April 2021
4.14 Review of Accounting Policy
4.15 Proposed
Closure of Portions of Unamed and Unconstructed
Road Reserve in the Pinjar Region
4.16 Donations to be Considered by Council - June 2021
Advocacy & Economic Development
4.17 Neerabup Industrial Area : Application for Subdivision - Lot 9100 Mather Drive, Neerabup
4.19 Annual Delegated Authority Review 2020/2021
4.20 Review
of the City of Wanneroo Animals Local Law and
amendment to the Bee Keeping Local Law
4.21 Repeal
of Standing Orders Local law 2008 and adoption of
Standing Orders Local Law 2021
Item 6_____ Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
Item 7_____ Public Question Time
8.1 Grant
of Access Rights over City Freehold Land Parcels in
Moorpark Avenue, Yanchep
8.2 Mindarie Regional Council Resource Recovery Facilty
Item 9_____ Date of Next Meeting
Agenda
Good evening Councillors, staff, ladies and gentlemen, we wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Whadjuk people. We would like to pay respect to the Elders of the Nyoongar nation, past and present, who have walked and cared for the land and we acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contributions made to the life of this city and this region.
Item 2 Apologies and Leave of Absence
Item 3 Deputations
Planning & Development Services
4.1 Consideration of Proposed Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones following advertising and preparation of Amendment No. 195 to DPS2
File Ref: 40149 – 21/76702
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To consider proceeding with the adoption of Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones following public advertising.
Background
At its 14 December 2020 meeting (PS07-12/20) Council resolved to advertise Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones (LPP 4.27) as included in Attachment 1.
Detail
The proposed LPP 4.27 was prepared under the provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) to provide guidance and direction on the City’s approach and position on the matters detailed in the policy.
Consultation
Draft LPP 4.27 was advertised for public comment between 11 January 2021 and 18 February 2021 by way of:
· An advertisement published in the 14 January 2021 edition of the Wanneroo Times newspaper;
· Display at the City’s Civic Centre and on the City’s website; and
· Correspondence to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage.
One submission was received by the closing date from a Planning consultant on behalf of a landowner and one submission was received shortly after the closing date from the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage. Both submissions acknowledged the need for LPP 4.27 but raised concerns with aspects of the proposed provisions. These are discussed further below in the report.
Comment
Key elements of LPP 4.27 are outlined below:
LPP 4.27: Mixed Use Zones
The purpose of this proposed LPP 4.27 is to provide guidance for the consideration of development and subdivision within the City’s Mixed Use Zones. The proposed Policy does not deal with land use permissibility (which is dealt with by DPS 2). The proposed Policy has been set out to achieve the objectives of the Mixed Use Zone and improve the manner in which development proposals are processed, as well as enhance the City’s planning framework by setting appropriate controls and putting in place consistent measures.
The policy also sets out to manage potential impacts from non-residential uses on residents by requiring designs to address issues such as noise, light, fumes and visual privacy.
Submissions:
As noted above, two submissions have been received following consultation on the proposed policy. Both submissions acknowledged the need for LPP 4.27 but made some suggestions and raised concerns which are detailed in the Schedule of Submissions included as Attachment 2 to this report. Administration’s response and recommendation is provided to each matter raised. A summary of the matters raised is discussed below.
Submission by Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage
The DPLH submission raised three matters:
1) suggested clarifying the requirement for a ‘designated front room’ as to which type of building(s) it applies to;
2) the proposed provision for a minimum lot size; and
3) application of the policy in Urban Development zones.
With respect to the first point, it is agreed this provision can be clarified. Additional wording can be included to explain that the requirement would be applicable to all buildings that are not in the first instance proposed to be used for any non-residential purpose.
Having regard to the second point, the DPLH does not object to the proposed provision but identifies that in order for a minimum lot size requirement to have statutory weight, it will need to be included in DPS 2 through an amendment. It is recommended that Council initiates an amendment to DPS 2 to insert a provision that states that the minimum lot size in a Mixed Use shall be 300m2.
The third matter relates to clarifying how the Policy will apply to Urban Development zones where land is zoned Mixed Use. It is considered that the provisions of clauses 3.14.3 and 3.14.4 of DPS 2 deal with this issue, but in the interests of clarity further wording may be added to explain that the Policy applies to all land that is classified as Mixed Use in Urban Development zones or in any structure plan.
Submission by CLE (Town Planning Consultants)
This submission raised a number of concerns in relation to:
1) the proposed minimum lot size provision;
2) need for a designated front room;
3) minimum floor to ceiling height;
4) density, land use conflict;
5) higher development costs;
6) adaptability of buildings; and
7) applicability of the proposed LPP.
Detailed responses are provided in the submission table, however to further explain the recommended approach by Administration the following comments are provided.
The purpose of Mixed Use zone is to facilitate the development of a range of uses that will contribute to the economic growth of the City and activation of places while also acting as areas of transition between more intensive activity centres and quieter residential areas. The intention of the proposed policy is to support the activation of Mixed Use zones with a range of uses rather than facilitating single residential housing.
The introduction of some limited requirements to support a “change of use” to a non-residential use are considered necessary to facilitate this outcome. The provision of a designated room capable of being easily fitted out for commercial uses is considered a simple method of ensuring that the built form constructed in the Mixed Use zone will have the ability to facilitate at least a small component of commercial use.
The minimum lot size provision provides greater design flexibility for the development of sites of a range of uses and improves the ability to provide on-site parking to support the development. It is not considered likely that lots under this size can reasonably facilitate multiple uses, particularly when they include residential.
The potential for land use conflicts is acknowledged, however the specific premise of the Mixed Use zone is to enable a range of uses to co-exist in close proximity - including residential and non-residential uses and acknowledging that there would some impact on amenity as a necessary outcome to create a more vibrant urban environment.
The value of land in Mixed Use zones should reflect the wider range of uses possible. These requirements and any associated costs of developing in a Mixed Use zone should be factored into decisions to purchase land in this zone as differentiated from pure Commercial or Residential zoned land.
If no changes are introduced, there will simply be a continuation of the current outcomes the City is observing in its Mixed Use Zones. Mixed Uses zones will likely continue to be developed for purely residential single houses in the current manner and development of a more complex urban environment which is the intent of the zone will not be realised.
In regard to the matters raised in the submissions, Attachment 2 describes the modifications that are recommended to LPP 4.27. Attachment 3 includes a revised version of LPP 4.27 that incorporates the recommended modifications highlighted in red.
Amendment to DPS 2
As noted above, as an outcome of the review of the policy it is recommended that DPS 2 be amended by inserting a provision to limit the minimum lot size in a Mixed Use zone to 300m2. Where a scheme amendment is proposed, Council must consider what type of amendment it is under Regulation 34 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations). In this case, Administration considers that proposed amendment No. 195 meets the following criteria for a ‘Standard Amendment’:
‘An amendment relating to a zone or reserve that is consistent with objectives identified in the scheme for that zone or reserve.’
‘Any other amendment that is not a complex or basic amendment.’
Should Council be supportive of preparing an amendment, it will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) pursuant to Sections 81 and 82 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. The EPA will assess the environmental impacts of the proposal to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is necessary.
Subject to no objections being received from the EPA, the amendment must be advertised for public comment for a period of at least 42 days. pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Regulations.
Statutory Compliance
The preparation of new policies is required to be prepared and processed in accordance with Clause 4 of the Deemed Provisions of DPS 2.
An amendment to DPS 2 can be processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The proposed Local Planning Policy is intended to establish standards and direction for the City to consider, assess and determine applications for development approval.
Financial Implications
The cost of undertaking the necessary actions for Council to proceed with the proposed LPP No. 4.27 and of preparing Amendment No. 195 to DPS 2 can be met from existing operational budgets.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES that there were two submissions received in respect to the proposed Local Planning Policy 4.27: Mixed Use Zones, and Administration’s comments on those submissions contained in Attachment 2 to this report;
2. Pursuant to Clause 4(3)(ii) of the Deemed Provisions of the City of Wanneroo’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 PROCEEDS with Local Planning Policy 4.27: Mixed Use Zones, with modifications, as provided in Attachment 3;
3. Pursuant to Clause 4(4) of the Deemed Provisions of District Planning Scheme No. 2 PUBLISHES notice on the City’s website of its decision to adopt Local Planning Policy 4.27: Mixed Use Zones;
4. FORWARDS a copy of Local Planning Policy 4.27: Mixed Use Zones, as included in Attachment 3, to the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage for information;
5. Writes to submitters to inform them of this decision;
6. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, PREPARES Amendment No. 195 to the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to amend the local planning scheme by inserting a new clause 3.5.3 under Part 3 – Zones as follows:-
‘3.5.3 The minimum lot size in a Mixed Use zone shall be 300m2.’
7. Pursuant to Regulation 34 and Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 195 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment for the following reasons:
a) an amendment relating to a zone or reserve that is consistent with the objectives identified in the scheme for that zone or reserve; and
b) any other amendment that is not a complex or basic amendment.
8. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 195 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority;
9 Subject to approval from the Environmental Protection Authority, ADVERTISES Amendment No. 195 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 42 days pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
10. NOTES that a further Report will be presented to a future Council Meeting, following advertising of Amendment No. 195 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, seeking resolution in respect to whether to support (with or without modification) or not support Amendment No. 195.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Draft Local Planning Policy No. 4.27 Mixed Use Zones (advertised copy) |
20/539801 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones - Summary of submissions |
21/215871 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Local Planning Policy No. 4.27: Mixed Use Zones - Final modified version following advertising |
21/230825 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 21
Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment
File Ref: 5734V06 – 21/197396
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider authorising various actions associated with the management of Developer Contribution Arrangements (DCA’s) under the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2).
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 20 April 2021 (PS03-04/21), Council supported Amendment 185 (as modified) to DPS2 and authorised execution and referral of the amendment to the Western Australian Planning Commissions for approval (pending). The amendment will facilitate a number of improvements to the provisions relating to the management of DCP’s by the City.
In this regard, Administration previously identified numerous decisions relating to DCP management are not currently able to be delegated to Administration. This is due to DPS2 referring to Council in determining certain actions (which cannot be delegated) rather than the local government (that can be delegated). Previously, the interpretation was broadly interpreted as ‘Council’ being the same as the ‘local government’; therefore, the daily decisions such as quotations, tax invoices and the deferral of contributions were carried out by Administration. As previously reported to Council, the inability to delegate certain aspects of Developer Contribution Plan (DCP) management was an unintended consequence embedded in the drafting of DPS2, but it cannot be interpreted differently until such time that DPS2 is amended to replace the term ‘Council’ with ‘local government’.
The consequence of this is that until the Scheme Amendment is gazetted, Council is required to make these decisions. Until this occurs, all discretionary decisions relating to DCP’s in DPS2 that refer to ‘Council’, will need to be reported to Council for approval.
Subsequent to the finalisation of Amendment 185, Council will have the ability to determine which aspects of DCP management to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer.
Detail
Administration is required to refer a range of DCP decisions to Council in the form of a summary report to authorise various actions, including:
· Tax Invoice/ Quotations for Contributions required by conditions of subdivision or development approval;
· Deferral of contributions requests and lodgement of a Caveat;
· Offsetting of Cell Works credits against Infrastructure Contributions Payable (land or works); and
· Prefunding of Cell Works.
In relation to the above, the actions normally occur through the subdivision process and therefore require a timely determination. Subdividers frequently require quotations on DCP, offsetting of Cell Works Credits and payment of compensation in accordance with the requirements of DPS2 to satisfy conditions of subdivision. If these requests are not processed in a timely manner, then this could lead to delays in the creation of new lots.
In addition, certain actions required as part of the annual review of DCP’s may require an earlier determination by Council to inform the annual review process. These decisions may be included into the DCP report to enable the timely consideration of factors affecting the annual review.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
Attachment 1 includes the details of the various aspects of DCP management that require a Council determination as follows:
Tax Invoices/ Quotations
In accordance with the relevant sections of DPS2, Council may, upon receiving a written request from an owner of land in a Cell, provide the landowners with a Tax Invoice or Quotation to enable the subdivider to pay their infrastructure Costs. The estimates are valid for a period of six months and calculated using the Infrastructure Cost per Lot (ICPL) or contribution rate approved by Council at the last annual review of costs.
The preparation of a Tax Invoice is the preferred manner to provide landowners with an estimate of their Infrastructure Costs, which provides a mechanism to inform and capture the contribution liability for both the landowner and the City.
In most cases, a landowner will request a Tax Invoice or Quotation to facilitate the contribution payment necessary to comply with the conditions of planning approval. These conditions are most commonly associated with subdivision conditions and payment is required to enable the new lots to be created.
All Cells and DCP areas have well defined methodologies in DPS2 for calculating landowner’s contribution liabilities, thereby ensuring clarity in the calculation of individual landowner’s obligations, as reported in Attachment 1.
Cell Works – Payment for Credits
Cell works may be prefunded by the landowner through the provision of land and or construction works. Land acquisition is compensated at the ‘assessed’ value adopted by Council as part of the last Annual Review and in accordance with Clause 9.10.6 of DPS2.
The vesting or transfer of land for Public Open Space and/or road purposes to the crown occurs through the subdivision process in accordance with an approval issued by the WAPC. Where this land is a Cell Work, the landowner receives a credit or compensation for the works (where funds are available). Further, DPS2 provides that compensation is payable at the ‘Assessed’ Value for the relevant Cell (unless compulsorily acquired), which is annually approved by Councils as part of the Annual Review process. In subdivisions that also include proposed residential lots, the contribution liability will be off-set against the credit payable for Cell Works in accordance with DPS2, with any residual payment being made to the landowner.
Credits for individual landowners are listed in Attachment 1 for Councils consideration; and will only be recommended where adequate funding exists within the relevant DCP account.
Statutory Compliance
The completion of the annual review ensures that contribution payments, compensation and estimated costs are compliant with Council’s statutory obligations in accordance with DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate Risk Registers. The annual review of the DCP assists in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it ensures that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. The strategic risk relating to stakeholder relationships applies as a key element in the DCP review process to maintain effective engagement with relevant stakeholders. In addition, the Corporate Risk relating to financial management would apply as awareness of financial policies and financial management at unit level will be maintained to promote accountability by business owners and an integrated approach to risk assurance.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the actions in relation to the management of Developer Contribution Arrangements under District Planning Scheme No. 2, as contained in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - DCP Action Attachment |
21/216564 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 34
File Ref: 5734V06 – 21/1378
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Issue
To consider Administration’s recommended response to public submissions received in response to the advertising of the Annual Review of Cell Costs for the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Developer Contributions Arrangements.
Background
The East Wanneroo Cells include the areas of Wanneroo, Ashby, Tapping, Hocking, Pearsall, Landsdale, Darch, Madeley and Wangara (refer Attachment 1).
The City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS 2) provides the statutory basis for the administration and management of Developer Contributions Plans (DCP), including provisions that describe the nature and extent of Cell Works that could be charged to the Cells.
DPS 2 requires the City to review the East Wanneroo Cell costs at least annually and in any event, prior to the commencement of each new financial year. This includes the review of Estimated Lot Yields (ELY) for Cells 1-6 and 9 (residential Cells), the remaining area of the industrial Cells 7 and 8 to be developed, actual expenditure in the previous financial year and the costs associated with completing the remaining Cell Works.
On 14 December 2020 (PS02-12/20), Council considered the draft Annual Review of Costs for 2020-2021, which reflected the recommendations of a second Internal Transactional Review (refer Attachment 2), including a recommendation that a further $3,818,197.43 (including $970k interest adjustments) be transferred from the DCP Cell Accounts to the municipal accounts for Cell Works for the following:
· All pathways greater than 2.1 metres wide (previously only 2.1 metre Dual Use Paths were included), including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths;
· All Cells Works, including rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement; and
· Preliminary and general costs (e.g. design, traffic management) relating to the simultaneous construction, repair, removal, replacement or improvement of both the first and second carriageway pavement have been shared between the City and Developer Contributions Plans.
Council resolved to advertise the Annual Review of Costs for the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 for a period of 56 days from 23 December 2020 to 17 February 2021. The Annual Review included revised cost estimates and land valuations and recommended Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) and the assessed land valuation for each cell as listed below:
· Cell 1 - ICPL of $18,019 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
· Cell 2 - ICPL of $25,476 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
· Cell 3 - ICPL of $17,457 and Land Valuation of $1,887,500 per hectare;
· Cell 4 - ICPL of $23,328 and Land Valuation of $1,937,500 per hectare;
· Cell 5 - ICPL of $30,909 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare;
· Cell 6 - ICPL of $24,678 and Land Valuation of $2,087,500 per hectare;
· Cell 7 - $11.37 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,125,000 per hectare;
· Cell 8 - $18.94 per square metre and Land Valuation of $2,037,500 per hectare; and
· Cell 9 - ICPL of $29,947 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare.
Detail
The City received 8 submissions during advertising, which raised a number of issues regarding the Annual Review. Issues were also raised in relation to the City’s operational management of DCPs.
A summary of the submissions and Administration’s response is included as Attachment 3. The salient issues raised relate to the following:
· The City’s interpretation and scope of Cell Works - second Internal Transactional Review.
· Calculation of ICPL rates and return of excess funds.
· Detailed Cost Information and Cell Valuation.
· Estimated Lot Yields and prioritisation of Cell Works
· Inconsistency with and implications of State Planning Policy 3.6 (SPP3.6) – Infrastructure Contributions
1. Submission – Scope of Cell Works recommended by second Internal Transactional Review
A number of objections have been received in relation to the inclusion of rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement of Cell Works after the initial construction of the infrastructure, which are paid for by a DCP, as a result of the second Internal Transactional Review, as summarised below:
· Objectors state that the interpretation of Cell Works by the City to include maintenance, replacement, renewal and refurbishment costs is not clearly specified in DPS 2 or consistent with the original intent of the scheme.
· The DPS 2 terminology only refers to single carriageway works and if these works were intended then DPS 2 would have specifically defined these works by reference to a second carriageway, similar to the reference to the ultimate road reserve, which includes land for the second carriageway.
· Shared use paths and rebuilding, repair or replacement is not an error or omission as it was never contemplated or conceived as Cell Works and should not be interpreted or included as a Cell Work.
· The City’s interpretation of Cell Works is considered by objectors to be a direct contravention of clause 5.1 of the current SPP 3.6, which states that ‘the contributions are for the initial capital requirements only and not for ongoing maintenance and/or operating costs’.
· Landowners should not be charged for the rebuilding, upgrading or replacement of infrastructure that was initially funded by the DCP, as asset management and maintenance is funded by Council charges and rates as well as State grants.
· If the funds proposed to be recovered were previously derived from rates, objectors question whether the City is intending to refund the equivalent rates revenue to its ratepayers from the years that those rates were levied.
· Objectors state that if the City intends to apply a new interpretation based on an ambiguous wording of DPS2 then a proper planning process should be applied by amending the Scheme to specify the works proposed under the interpretation.
· A second ‘phase’ to second Internal Transactional Review translates into a third Transactional Review and further charges to DCPs (potentially including Cell 6) for infrastructure maintenance, upgrade, renewal, and replacement items that are the City's responsibility to fund instead.
One landowner also wrote to the Chair of the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) and to the Minister for Planning, objecting to the City’s approach and requesting the Minister to intervene. The WAPC Chair and the Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) have also subsequently written to the City to advise that the revised interpretation is not in line with the intent of State Planning Policy 3.6 – Development contributions for infrastructure (SPP 3.6) (Attachment 3 and Attachment 5).
Administration Response
The City’s scheme provisions for Cell 1-9 were initially prepared in the early 1990’s and are in some instances ambiguous and require interpretation as to what constitutes a Cell Work. The City undertook an Internal Transactional Review and applied an interpretation to the scope of Cell Works under DPS 2 as part of the Annual Review approved by Council in December 2019. Additional expenditure was subsequently identified and included into the second Internal Transactional Review findings, as below:
Works not previously identified in the first Internal Transactional Review for second carriageway (four lanes) structures and environmental offset costs in accordance with Councils proper interpretation of Cell Works (December 2019);
In addition, the second Internal Transactional Review recommends that Council clarifies and agrees that the following works be included as Cell Works.
· All pathways greater than 2.1 metres wide (previously only 2.1 metre Dual Use Paths were included), including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths;
· All Cells Works, including rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement; and
· Preliminary and general costs (e.g. design, traffic management) relating to the simultaneous construction, repair, removal, replacement or improvement of both the first and second carriageway pavement have been shared between the City and Developer Contributions Plans;
The total net transference for these works equates to $3,818,197 (including $970,000 in interest) from the DCP Cell accounts to the municipal accounts.
The provisions of DPS 2 are drafted sufficiently broadly to provide for the inclusion of all pathways greater than 2.1 metres wide, including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths as Cell Works. Schedule 6 of DPS 2 refers to the term ‘structures’ as including dual use paths. Previously the City had applied a narrow meaning to dual use paths only included to 2.1 metre dual use pathways along one side of the road. However, in contemporary engineering definitions, dual use paths may be considered any pathways that serves a dual purpose (walking, cycling etc.), including 3.0 metre wide Principle Shared Use Paths, which were not previously included.
In relation to the removal, rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement or improvement of the initial capital works (DCP-funded) the applied interpretation is not definitive and whilst this work aligns with the description of Cell Works in DPS 2, the provisions are silent on this issue. Administration therefore took a view that works relating to the removal, rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement or improvement of the initial capital works (DCP-funded) could be included for the purposes of public advertising the Annual Reviews, in order to obtain landowner views on the inclusion of these as Cell Works, prior to formalising this through the final consideration of annual reviews.
The development industry and affected landowners have raised significant concern that the rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement or improvement are not reasonable costs and will introduce new and uncertain future costs that cannot be reasonably quantified, estimated or applied to the Cells and are inconsistent with the intended scope of works under DPS 2; and those defined in SPP3.6.
In this regard, Administration notes that DCPs are only one funding source for the provisions of public infrastructure and that road rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement costs are typically funded through state government taxes, local government property rates, federal assistance grants, user and access charges and fees and charges as part of the City’s asset management obligations.
In terms of the recently gazetted SPP 3.6 (and previous version – 2009), this states that “the contributions are for the initial capital requirements only and not for ongoing maintenance or operating costs of the infrastructure, beyond that required of developers through the subdivision and development process”. As outlined in SPP 3.6, the intent of DCPs is to facilitate development in areas of fragmented land ownership by sharing the cost of providing any necessary infrastructure, including roads and POS and specifies that the scope of items of infrastructure in a DCP should not be expanded, to ensure the principle of certainty is upheld, unless any changes have been included in an amendment to the Scheme, and the required public consultation has been undertaken.
SPP 3.6 specifies that the extent of infrastructure that may be included into a DCP is justified on the principle of ‘need and nexus’, with the infrastructure costs being apportioned between existing residents’ needs (or external demand) and the need generated by the landowners within the DCP or structure plan area.
Consistent with the submissions the letter from the WAPC Chair (refer Attachment 4) confirms that contributions should only be sought for the initial capital requirements and not for ongoing maintenance or operating costs or the replacement of DCP funded works. In this regard, the intent of DCP’s is to fund the initial construction of the infrastructure but then the City is expected to pay for ongoing maintenance and replacement etc. through alternative funding sources (e.g. rates or grants).
Due to the age of Part 9 of DPS 2, the provisions do not align with the SPP3.6, and is not explicit in its wording for works undertaken beyond the initial capital works. Therefore, Council is required to determine whether these works are Cell Works and whether costs associated with these should be transferred from the DCP Cell accounts to the municipal accounts (as the City funded these). In this regard, it is recommended that any Cell Works associated with rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement be excluded from the definition of Cell Works. Further consideration should also be given to improve the provisions of DPS 2 to provide clarity and resolve these inconsistencies through an amendment to DPS 2. As part of this, public consultation will be undertaken to provide landowners with the opportunity to make submissions.
Administration considers that the initial capital works/infrastructure are those set out in Schedule 6 Section 3 of DPS, which varies between Cells but typically includes a percentage of the total cost of constructing the full earthworks, one carriageway and all structures. What constitutes structures has been determined as part of the first internal transactional review, which has been finalised and endorsed by Council. Any works after that would be considered to be ‘rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement’ and if Council agrees with this position then these costs would not be a DCP cost and would be paid for by another funding source (either municipal or possible grant funding).
It is noted that a second phase to the second Internal Transactional Review is required to investigate the Cell transactions for the pre-2006 expenditures, which has not been previously undertaken; and to ensure that Cell Works have been correctly charged in accordance with DPS 2.
Recommended Action
Administration has reviewed the submissions and is recommending that the objections raised by landowners in relation to the removal, rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement or improvement of the initial capital works (DCP-funded) be agreed.
Based on this, the proposed transference of an estimated value of works of $737,623.32 (including interest of $55,718.98) should be excluded as a Cell Work and these funds should not be transferred from the DCP Cell accounts to the municipal accounts. This adjustment will be reviewed for accuracy and included into the 2020-2021 financial year as a correction.
2. Submission – Calculation of ICPL rates and return of excess funds
A number of objections have been received in relation to the City’s calculation of ICPL rates and about the return of excess funds. Landowners requests that significant excess funds are being generated in some cells and that these excess funds should be returned. Landowners also stated that excess funds should be utilised to reduce the Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL rates).
Administration Response
As demonstrated in the auditor reports, some Cells (1, 4, 5, 6 and 9) could generate excess funds (at differing levels) upon full development. In these cells, the City has retained the ICPL to avoid an inequitable and significant reduction in the ICPL rates. In Cells 1 and 9, the City has previously agreed to identify and apportion estimated excess funds to minimise inequity between contributing landowners. This balances the contributions of previous contributors and future contributors and enabled the City to:
· Determine appropriate contribution rates (ICPL) for those cells (e.g. reduction in rate rather than keeping it the same); and
· Identify an estimated (potential) excess return to previous contributors.
In Cell 1, a pre-payment of estimated excess funds was made to landowners that contributed prior to June 2019 with subsequent subdividers receiving a portion of the estimated excess as a reduction in the ICPL rate. This was possible due to the Cell accounts holding significantly more funds than required to complete the Cell Works and a contingency amount being retained by the City pending the completion of Cell Works. In Cell 9, the excess funds were estimated for the purposes of calculating an appropriate contribution rate for remaining landowners, however a return of excess was not recommended, pending greater certainty on remaining income and costs. In both Cells, the calculation was premised on a distribution of excess funds methodology that would otherwise occur at full development in accordance with clause 9.13.3 of DPS 2.
It is noted that SPP 3.6 now includes provisions that recommends that the local governments should reconcile significant cost variations as soon as possible, rather than awaiting full development, as currently required by DPS 2. In this regard, the current provisions of DPS 2 specifies that excess funds should only be returned when all the land in the cell has been developed.
The retention of ICPL rates is not adequately defined in DPS 2, and in some cells, could result in additional excess funds being generated, pending full development. Whilst SPP 3.6 suggests a reconciling payment be made as soon as possible, there are relevant factors that apply in each Cell that will require specific consideration in relation to financial and operational risk.
To address the submissions in relation to the return of excess funds, DPS 2 could be amended to introduce appropriate criteria for reconciling payments to previous contributors in line with SPP 3.6, as this is not appropriate to be dealt with through an Annual Review process. The Scheme provisions would need to define the circumstances and methodology for determining a reconciling payment with consideration for relevant factors such as timing, development constraints, remaining contribution payments, remaining cell works and reasonable administration and contingency costs.
Recommended Action
It is recommended that the current DPS 2 provisions be amended in line with the requirements of SPP 3.6, to include appropriate provisions to deal with potential excess funds in a fair, transparent and equitable way. In the interim, it is recommended that Council approves the ICPL rates as advertised as part of this Annual Review.
3. Detailed cost information and Cell valuation;
Objections have also been received in relation to the lack of cost information and Cell valuation. Objectors state that inadequate information is being provided by the City to enable a detailed review and scrutiny of the estimated costs, including the findings from the second Internal Transactional Review. These also state that the Cell valuation is outdated and does not reflect current market increases after COVID-19 economic stimulus initiatives.
Administration Response
Administration has engaged with submitters and provided additional detailed information when requested. The information provided in the Annual Review is relatively high-level due to the format of the cost reviews and to enable cost estimates to be legible and easily considered. The second Internal Transactional Review included a summary breakdown of the relevant project expenditure and a detailed breakdown of costs, which was provided to submitters on request. This has highlighted the need for greater transparency of administration costs, charges and transferences as part of the Annual Review process.
Consideration for the cell valuation follows the provisions of DPS 2. In accordance with DPS 2, the City is required to appoint a valuation panel to arrive at a consensus value, which is then advertised as part of the Annual Review process. The valuation panel recommendations were provided to the City in June 2020 to inform the Annual Review and facilitate the external auditing timeframes. In this regard, it is recognised that the valuation can become outdated if the Annual Review is delayed, however the assessed value will remain current until Council determines a new value. Administration has already initiated the next Annual Review valuation process and a revised valuation will be obtained and included into the next Annual Review.
It is noted that market values for lots and dwellings can fluctuate by increasing or decreasing, depending on factors such as interest rates, grants and COVID-19, however, the specific implications on englobo land values cannot be established without valuation evidence. It is likely that sustained increases in house prices and demand may have flow-on affects to the enblobo value for the cells, which will be updated in the next Annual Review process.
Recommended Action
Administration recommends that the current cell valuation be accepted and that Council notes that updated valuations will form part of the next Annual Review for the 2021-2022 period, which is currently underway. In order to facilitate greater transparency of estimated costs, it is also recommended that improvements be made to the City’s approach to the Annual Review reporting information.
4. Estimated Lot Yields (ELY) and prioritisation of Cell Works
Objections have been received in relation to the estimated lot yields (ELY) in Cells as well as the prioritisation of Cell Works to be funded by DCPs. Objections state that the current DPS 2 estimated lot yields of 9 per hectare is understated resulting in significant excess funds being generated and landowners being effectively over-charged, and that these should be increased to reflect lot yield trends within a Cell. Objectors also request that Cell works be prioritised and completed to ensure contributing landowners benefit from the infrastructure.
A number of submissions provided estimates for remaining lot yields in order to demonstrate that additional income will be received within a particular cell and therefore generate additional excess funds.
Administration Response
The ELY of DPS 2 specifies 9 lots per hectare for Cells 1-6 and 13 lots per hectare for Cell 9. It is noted that the ELY for Cells 1-6 is relatively conservative and has contributed towards the creation of excess funds in some cells due to the actual yields exceeding the estimated lot yields. This is as a result of the fact that contemporary lot sizes are much smaller than what was originally the case when the DCP provisions were prepared, resulting in more lots being created which in turn leads to more contributions and thus excess funds.
In order to address the submissions, DPS 2 can be amended to reflect an updated ELY in line with contemporary lot yields, which will assist in achieving greater accuracy in estimating future lot yields, setting ICPL rates and estimating potential excess funds in some cells. It is not considered to be appropriate to address this through the Annual Review process and should be through an amendment of the Scheme.
In terms of the prioritisation of Cell Works, the East Wanneroo Cells have completed funding for numerous road construction projects, including the acquisition and construction or Pinjar Road, Ocean Reef Road, Lenore/Hartman Road, Mirrabooka Avenue and Hepburn Avenue.
The remaining major projects include Dundebar Road (between Civic Drive and Griffith Road) and Gnangara Road (between Wanneroo and Mirrabooka Avenue), which require finalisation of the detailed design and remaining land acquisition. The prioritisation of these remaining Cell Works is supported and necessary to finalise the outstanding works for the affected Cells.
Recommended Action
In order to address the submissions, it is recommended that the current DPS 2 provisions be amended to include an estimated lot yield which reflects more realistic yields for the Cells. It is also recommended that Administration works proactively to deliver the outstanding Cell Works including the Dundebar Road and Gnangara Road designs and construction to ensure that these are delivered in a timely manner.
5. Inconsistency and implications of State Planning Policy 3.6 – Infrastructure Contributions
Submissions have raised various inconsistencies between the current provisions of DPS 2 and the updated SPP 3.6 released in April 2021. Objectors state that the interpretation of Cell Works is in direct contravention of Clause 5.1 of the current State Planning Policy 3.6, which states that the contributions are for the initial capital requirements only and not for ongoing maintenance and/or operating costs. They also request that in order to ensure alignment with the principles of SPP 3.6, the City should adopt a purposive approach to its statutory interpretation and adopt an ICPL based on the information and evidence it now has available. Objectors also request that the City should update DPS 2 to reflect SPP 3.6 in relation to the closure of DCPs and the return of excess funds.
Administration Response
The matter of rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement has been discussed earlier in the report.
The updated SPP 3.6 gazetted in April 2021 requires that local governments ensure that all existing DCPs are aligned with the SPP within 3 years of the gazettal of the Policy. Existing DCPs are anticipated to continue to remain valid for the lifespan of the DCP, however, all DCPs regardless of the approval dates, must adhere to all operational, monitoring and reporting requirements of the Policy. Existing DCPs that do not have a lifespan or review period (as in the case of the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9) must also be amended to include the anticipated lifespan of the DCP and priority and timing for delivery of infrastructure. In addition, SPP 3.6 provides some guidance on reconciling excess funds and closure of Cells, which is not currently defined in DPS 2.
The non-alignment of the City’s current provisions in DPS 2 with the updated SPP 3.6 is acknowledged, however it should be noted that the current scheme provisions were drafted prior to the gazettal of the first SPP in 2009. The City’s DPS 2 include statutory provisions, whilst the provisions of SPP 3.6 are ‘due regard’ only.
As the updated SPP 3.6 requires the City to update DPS 2 to align with the operational, monitoring and reporting requirements of SPP 3.6, it is necessary for the City to update DPS 2 to align this with the updated SPP 3.6. This would include provisions to address the closure of DCPs and the return of excess funds.
In relation to closure of DCPs, the current provisions of DPS 2 do not include a methodology to close a Cell until all the land within the Cell develops, which means that every landholding must be subdivided. Due to ‘hold-out’ landowners, there may be delays in completing the Cell Works or returning excess funds (in some cells). The period of delay could be decades and there is a possibility that this may never eventuate, meaning the Cell would continue operating indefinitely. As part of a future scheme amendment, provisions could be included to provide Council with the ability to consider closing a Cell prior to full development subject to a number of informing criteria.
In relation to the return of excess funds, the current DPS 2 provisions specify that upon full development of all the land within a Cell any excess funds should be returned to contributing landowners as a proportion of the total number of lots produced in the Cell. In this regard, a future amendment to DPS 2 could consider the return of excess funds on the basis of the value of contributions actually paid by a particular landowner. This could potentially enable all contributing landowners to receive a portion of the excess funds, including those that paid additional contributions for group housing and commercial sites.
Recommended Action
In order to align the City’s DPS 2 with the updated SPP 3.6 as required by the State Government, it is recommended that the Council considers the amendment of the scheme provisions to align with SPP 3.6. This amendment could also potentially cover the other issues raised by objectors as outlined in this report.
Consultation
In accordance with the provisions of DPS 2, the City advertised the proposed land value for a period of 28 days and the revised Cell Costs for a period of 42 days as per the following. The advertising dates were extended by 14 days due to the Christmas holiday period. In this regard, the Annual Review was advertised in the Wanneroo Times from 23 December 2020 to 17 February 2021; and the revised valuation was advertised in the West Australian from 19 December 2020 to 1 February 2021. Letters were also sent to affected landowners and the Annual Review was advertised on the City’s website.
Comment
The City’s DPS 2 requires that the East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 developer contribution arrangements are subject to an Annual Review process to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of infrastructure items.
The submissions raise a number of issues, including:
· Operation periods to be introduced for the East Wanneroo Cost Sharing Arrangements.
· Scope of works to be clearly defined and costed.
· Define and reconcile (return) potential excess funds.
· Revise the estimated lot yield of 9 lots per hectare for Cells 1-6, as currently defined in in DPS 2 to minimise the extent of excess funds.
· Prioritisation of remaining projects, including the finalisation of the detailed design for Gnangara Road and Dundebar Road, completion of land acquisitions for cell works (road widening and POS).
· Consideration for mechanisms to enable cells to be finalised or closed.
The ability for the City to address the issues raised in the submissions through the Annual Review process is limited, as these require fundamental changes which can only be facilitated through an amendment to DPS 2. As the City is required to amend its Scheme to align with the updated SPP 3.6, such an amendment can also include other changes to the scheme provisions to address some of the other issues raised by landowners.
Based on this, Administration recommends the following actions in relation to the submissions made through the Annual Review:
· The City’s position in respect to the provisions of DPS 2 as advertised is that the current provisions continue to apply to the Cell Areas until Council has considered a fundamental review of the DCP provisions as part of a future amendment to DSP 2 to align the scheme provisions with the updated SPP 3.6.
· That the removal, rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement or improvement of DCP-funded infrastructure beyond the initial capital works required by a DCP, not be considered a Cell Work and that the costs associated with these works not be transferred from the DCP Cell Accounts to the municipal accounts.
· That improvements be made City’s approach to the Annual Review reporting information to facilitate greater transparency of estimated costs, including a Capital Expenditure Plan (CEP) for each Cell to clearly define and prioritise remaining cell works. As part of the next Annual Review process, this information is recommended to be made available to landowners and is published as part of the consultation requirements for each Cell. In this regard, the publication and transparency on administration costs, charges and transferences should be made available as part of the Annual Reviews to enable landowners to access the detailed information that informs the revision of costs as standard procedure.
Statutory Compliance
In line with DPS 2, the completion of the Annual Review as outlined in this report will satisfy the City’s statutory obligations to complete Annual Reviews for the 2020/2021 financial year. External auditing of the DCP accounts has been completed in line with the provisions of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996. If the objections are not addressed to the satisfaction of the objectors, Council will be required to refer the objection for commercial arbitration in accordance with the provisions of DPS 2.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
CEO |
Manage |
The above risks have been identified and considered within the City’s existing Strategic Risk Register.
The Annual Review has been undertaken to ensure that adequate contingency is held to fund the remaining Cell Works and recognises factors that may affect a particular Cells income and expenditure estimates.
The work undertaken by the City in relation to the Internal Transactional Review and proper interpretation of the provisions of DPS 2 along with the completion of the Annual Review for all Cells reduces the City’s risk of impacts on trust, probity and accountability as it will bring the City to a level of compliance.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
To support the Annual Review (Cells 1-9), William Buck was engaged to perform audit to ensure the accuracies of the calculated ICPL rate. The relevant audit reports finalised and delivered to the City in October 2020.
The audit reports have confirmed that the adjusted contribution rates associated with Cell 2, 3, 7 and 8 are fairly stated and in compliance with DPS 2. In relation to Cells 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 the audit reports have highlighted that the methodology of DPS 2 cannot be utilised to establish an ICPL rate for charging remaining (undeveloped) landowners, where adequate funds exist (or are likely to exist) to complete the estimated remaining Cell Works. Administration recommends that the ICPL rates should be retained until consideration has been given to the improvements recommended by SPP3.6 can be considered by Council.
The City’s recent Annual Review for Cells 4, 5, 6 and 9 have demonstrated that there are major challenges in applying the current methodology of DPS2 to calculate the Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) rate, where excess funds are likely to occur. The ICPL rate is revised annually to ensure that the contributions will cover the cost of infrastructure. Where a Cell is nearing full development and adequate funds already received the ICPL rate can vary significantly. Where this occurs, it can create inequity between landowners that have already contributed and those yet to contribute. In this regard, contribution rates will naturally fluctuate through the annual review due to variations in land value, construction cost estimates and remaining income and are not usually significant variations. In order to deal with significant variation. Administration recommends that the ICPL rates should be retained to ensure a level of consistency by charging the remaining landowners the same as previous contributors, until consideration has been given to the improvements recommended by SPP3.6 can be considered by Council.
Subject to the agreement of Council to the recommendations of this report on submissions, Administration will make the necessary adjustments to the Long Term Financial Plan to reflect the revised DCP funding allocations and agreed transferences.
Due to the actioning of the second Internal Transactional Review findings in the prior year for $3,818,197.43, the costs associated with rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement of Cell Works (estimated to be $737,623.32) be transferred from municipal to the relevant DCP accounts.
In relation to Cell 3, it is advised that $756,952.79 (including interest) was recouped from this Cell in the 2018/19 financial period in line with the First Internal Transactional Review recommendations and has been reflected in the Cell 3 Annual Review as expenditure.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the public submissions received during the public consultation period for the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Annual Review of costs, as depicted in Attachment 3 to this report;
2. ENDORSES the recommended response made by Administration as described in the comments section and as referenced in Attachment 3 to this report;
3. APPROVES that Cell Works do not include the rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement of initial Cell Work capital infrastructure.
4. NOTES that there will be a financial adjustments and reimbursement from municipal to the relevant Cell accounts by removing Cell Works costs for rebuilding, resurfacing, replacement and improvement.
5. APPROVES the Annual Review of Cell Costs for Cells 1-9 in accordance with Clause 9.14.3 and 9.11.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, as defined in the below table;
· Cell 1 - ICPL of $18,019 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
· Cell 2 - ICPL of $25,476 and Land Valuation of $1,868,750 per hectare;
· Cell 3 - ICPL of $17,457 and Land Valuation of $1,887,500 per hectare;
· Cell 4 - ICPL of $23,328 and Land Valuation of $1,937,500 per hectare;
· Cell 5 - ICPL of $30,909 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare;
· Cell 6 - ICPL of $24,678 and Land Valuation of $2,087,500 per hectare;
· Cell 7 - $11.37 per m2 and Land Valuation of $2,125,000 per hectare;
· Cell 8 - $18.94 per m2 and Land Valuation of $2,037,500 per hectare; and
· Cell 9 - ICPL of $29,947 and Land Valuation of $2,012,500 per hectare.
6. REQUESTS Administration to consider an Amendment to DPS 2 to align with SPP 3.6 to address the following improvements:
· Operational monitoring and reporting requirements;
· Scope of works under the DPS 2 terminology for Cell Works.
· Define and reconcile (return) potential excess funds to contributors, prior to all the land in the Cell being developed;
· Increase the estimated lot yield to reflect current average lot density; and
· Consider options to enable cells to be finalised or closed
7. REQUESTS Administration to prioritise the remaining Cell Works, including the finalisation of detailed design and remaining land acquisition for Dundebar Road and Gnangara Road; and.
8. NOTES that a further Internal Transactional Review is underway to investigate the Cell transactions for the pre-2006 expenditures, which has not been previously undertaken; and to ensure that Cell Works have been correctly charged in accordance with DPS 2.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Cells 1-9 Consolidated Location Plan |
19/162679 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Second Transactional Internal Review |
20/517309 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 -Submissions Table (Annual Review 2020-2021) |
21/215775 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Letter from the Chair to Director Planning and Sustainability |
21/148222 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - UDIA Submission Annual Review of DCP Cells |
21/154133 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 58
Approval Services
File Ref: 4093 – 21/196862
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 7
Issue
To consider amending Local Planning Policy 4.6: Signs.
Background
Administration commenced a review in 2018 of Local Planning Policy 4.6: Signs (LPP 4.6). As part of the review Administration has investigated provisions relating to both digital and third party advertising signage within LPP 4.6.
The purpose of this report is to outline the modifications Administration has made to LPP 4.6, and for Council to adopt the draft policy for the purpose of advertising.
Detail
The current LPP 4.6 is considered to generally operate effectively with a format and structure that allows for signs to be easily assessed, whilst also offering exemptions for a number of small scale signage. This avoids unnecessary and onerous approval requirements for businesses and an administrative burden on the City. Most of the existing provisions within LPP 4.6 have been retained, however they have either been reordered within the policy or subject to minor wording modifications.
In addition, provisions related to digital and third party advertising signage have been prepared and implemented within Part 2 of LPP 4.6. Third party signage refers to the use of a signage structure to provide commercial advertising space that does not relate to the site in which it is located. This could include a roadside billboard or advertising space on the side of a building. Where a digital device is used the information displayed typically changes at regular intervals.
An unmarked copy of the current version of LPP 4.6 has been included as Attachment 1, and a marked up copy included as Attachment 2. The mark ups illustrated in Attachment 2 only reflect the proposed wording modifications to LPP 4.6 and not the formatting changes or inclusion of new provisions for ease of reference.
A copy of draft LPP 4.6 proposed for advertising is included as Attachment 3.
Consultation
The advertising requirements for amending LPP 4.6 follow the same procedures as those outlined in Part 2 Division 2 of the Deemed Provisions of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Deemed Provisions) related to the procedure for making a new planning policy. Advertising will therefore be undertaken by way of the following:
· Notification in the Wanneroo Times; and
· Publishing draft LPP 4.6 on the City’s website and making it available for viewing at the City’s Civic Centre.
Following advertising, a summary of any submissions received and Administration’s response to those submissions will be included in a report to Council to consider final adoption of LPP 4.6. Depending on the nature of any submissions received LPP 4.6 may proceed with or without modifications.
Comment
Updates to LPP 4.6
A number of changes have been made to LPP 4.6 to improve the legibility and format of the policy. Excluding the digital signage considerations that are discussed later in this report, the main modifications proposed are:
· Inclusion of graphics to provide a visual representation of the various ‘sign types’ within LPP 4.6. This is intended to make it easier for applicants and Administration to determine what sign type is most applicable to an application;
· Reordering LPP 4.6 so that the provisions that are ‘general’ in nature and apply to all proposals are contained at the front of the document. Currently some general standards are located at the front of the policy and others at the rear, which can result in provisions potentially being overlooked;
· Introduction of a new sign type to address Variable Messaging Signs (VMS) on private property. The proposed provision does not support the placement of a VMS within 20 metres of a lot boundary due to the potential traffic safety issues they can present. In addition, they typically detract from the amenity of an area given they are trailer mounted and do not integrate with surrounding development. Planning approval would be required for a VMS to be placed within 20 metres of a road frontage allowing Administration to consider these factors; and
· A definition of an ‘Advertising Sign’ has been included to clarify that LPP 4.6 only applies to advertising signage, and does not apply to other forms of signage such as traffic management signs, street signs or public information signs (these are dealt with under separate policies, such as the City’s Public Guidance Signage in Road Reserves Policy or exempt from approval requirements as public works).
A comprehensive list of the opportunities identified through the policy review process and the subsequent modifications made has been included as Attachment 4.
The above changes are considered minor updates that reflect current standards, whilst also improving the legibility of LPP 4.6 for customers and the City’s assessing Officers.
Digital Signage Provisions
LPP 4.6 has been updated to include provisions related to digital signage that are aligned with feedback provided by Council Members, and previous approvals issued by Administration (e.g. digital Pylon Signs at school establishments). The provisions have been designed to ensure that digital advertising is implemented throughout the City in a controlled manner to avoid an unintended and uncontrolled proliferation of digital signage, noting that the provisions can be reviewed by Administration any point required by Council and amended if deemed appropriate. All digital signage proposals will typically require development approval unless specifically exempt within the policy, which is discussed in further detail later in this report.
Draft LPP 4.6 allows for the consideration of digital signage in the following circumstances:
1. Pylon Signs and Wall Signs associated with schools, tafes or colleges, outdoor recreation (e.g. golf course), places of worship and tourist locations.
Administration Comment
Digital signs associated with schools, outdoor recreation (e.g. golf course), places of worship and tourist destinations are considered to be generally acceptable, do not detract from the streetscape and can provide an important community function. Given the scale and nature of these uses and the large population catchment of their customers, students or visitors, digital signage for these activities will not result in a proliferation of digital advertising throughout the City.
In addition, uses such as schools and places of worship typically display messages of community benefit, such as upcoming events. The implementation of digital signage can therefore assist in displaying such information in a clear and timely manner. Whilst tourist and recreational uses are less likely to display community messaging, they will also benefit from the ability to display information associated with the particular business or location.
‘Tourist Locations’ have been included within LPP 4.6 to support sites of strategic significance to the City from a tourism perspective, which may benefit from the ability to advertise via a digital platform. A definition of what constitutes a Tourist Location has been included within LPP 4.6 for clarity and will be at the discretion of the City.
2. On Commercial zoned land identified as a Neighbourhood Centre or above under DPS 2 or an applicable structure plan, or Business zoned land within an Integrated Business Centre, limited to the following:
i. One Pylon Sign per street frontage;
ii. One Wall Sign per street frontage; and
iii. One Window Sign per tenancy.
Administration Comment
Digital signage on Commercial zoned land has been proposed to apply to Neighbourhood Centres and above in size. The ‘centre hierarchy’ is in accordance with State Planning Policy 4.2: Activity Centres for Perth and Peel. Local Centres are considered to be of a size and scale that do not require digital advertising signage as they are designed to cater for the local community where residents are familiar with the goods and services on offer. Further, they are typically located in built up suburban areas surrounded by residential development, with the inclusion of digital signage likely to detract from the character and amenity of an area.
Neighbourhood Centres and above are of a size and scale where the inclusion of digital signage may be compatible with the Centre’s built form and character. This also supports the consideration of proposals such as the digital ‘Wall Sign’ at the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre that Council approved on 30 June 2020, plans of which are included as Attachment 5 for reference.
Draft LPP 4.6 allows for digital signage proposed on Business zoned land to be considered when it forms part of an ‘Integrated Business zone’. This is a definition that has been developed for LPP 4.6 and reflects a continuous area of Business zoned land that exceeds 10,000m2. Business zoned land does not form part of a ‘centre hierarchy’ like Commercial zoned land, with some individual lots within the City subject to a Business zoning. For example, there are multiple individual lots within the Wangara Industrial Area that are zoned Business, as outlined in Attachment 6. These lots are not considered appropriate or necessary locations for digital signage.
As such, LPP 4.6 has limited digital signage to an ‘Integrated Business zone’. Similar to the considerations for Commercial zoned land, areas of Business zoned land greater than 10,000m2 are of a size and scale that are appropriate for the consideration of digital signage, for the same reasons as those previously discussed.
As currently presented, draft LPP 4.6 limits digital signage in Commercial and Business zones to one Wall Sign and one Pylon Sign per ‘Centre’ or ‘Integrated zone’. This is considered to be a balanced set of criteria that reflects the early implementation of digital signage provisions within LPP 4.6. If the policy were to allow every tenancy to support digital signage it could, overtime, lead to an uncontrolled proliferation or ad-hoc implementation of digital advertising that may detract from the emerging or established character of an area. LPP 4.6 does permit each individual tenancy to have its own Window Sign.
These provisions do not permit the display of third party content, which ensures that all advertising relates to the site in which it is located. The consideration of third party signage in specific locations is addressed separately within the policy and covered in this report below.
Third Party Digital Signage
In addition to the above, LPP 4.6 has been updated to allow for the consideration of third party digital signage within ‘Activity Centres’ and along ‘Regional Transport Corridors’. As previously noted, third party signage refers to the use of a signage structure to provide commercial advertising space that is not related to the site in which the sign is located. LPP 4.6 addresses the following:
Activity Centres
The application of the policy within Activity Centres is proposed to be limited to Strategic, Secondary and District Centres. These are the larger destination based activity nodes that people often visit for extended periods to access a wide range of services. As such, appropriately designed third party digital signage could be compatible with, and contribute to the vibrancy of these large Centres. Whilst many of these Centres are still developing within the City, upon maturity they will have a built form and function that supports pedestrian oriented spaces and high levels of foot traffic. In this type of environment high quality third party digital signage, if appropriately integrated with the built form, can offer a level of visual interest that complements the activated and commercial nature of the area.
To ensure third party digital signage is located appropriately within these higher order Centres, provisions have been included to guide the placement and design of third party advertising structures. This includes being centrally located, integrated with the built form and focused on a pedestrianised area. This reflects the intent of third party digital signage in these spaces, which is to complement existing development and contribute to a Centre’s vibrancy, and is not designed to be directed at passing motorists.
Regional Transport Corridors
Third party digital signage along Regional Transport Corridors is proposed to be limited to Primary and Other Regional Roads, such as Wanneroo Road, Marmion Avenue and Ocean Reef Road. Lower order road networks are not considered suitable locations as they are typically adjacent to residential areas and could result in a proliferation of third party advertising signs. The enabling provisions would allow for the consideration of large third party digital billboards, such as a proposal received by the City in June 2019 on the corner of Ocean Reef Road and Fortitude Boulevard. For reference, the plans of this proposal are included as Attachment 7.
LPP 4.6 does not explicitly outline where a third party billboard would be acceptable, but has instead included the main criteria that would need to be satisfied for a proposal to be considered appropriate. This includes not being visible from any sensitive land uses (e.g. residential housing) or areas of public open space, given the likely impacts on amenity. Further, the proposal must not detract from the character of a locality and will require support from the managing authority of the road (typically Main Roads or the City). All digital signage applications will also be required to demonstrate they meet road safety requirements, given the purpose of these signs is to attract the attention of passing motorists.
Assessment Considerations
LPP 4.6 also includes ‘Assessment Considerations’ relevant to digital signage proposals to provide further guidance on the location and assessment of digital advertising signs.
This includes digital signage within a Commercial or Business zone being located and designed for reciprocal use by all tenancies. This is to encourage the design of digital signage to benefit a Centre as a whole and ensure it is appropriately integrated with the built form, similar to the digital Wall Sign approved at the Ashby Neighbourhood Centre (refer Attachment 5).
The Assessment Considerations also require applicants to provide information on the maximum level of luminance that is being proposed. Administration initially contemplated including a maximum acceptable level of luminance within LPP 4.6, however, upon further investigation this was not considered appropriate as this will be influenced by a number of site specific considerations (e.g. proximity to sensitive land uses, visibility from adjoining road reserves, size of the signage etc.) Therefore, the policy has acknowledged the need for an applicant to provide information on the proposed luminance, which will be considered by Administration as part of the assessment process.
The need to provide information relating to road safety has also been included, which is discussed separately in further detail below.
Exemptions
Draft LPP 4.6 includes planning exemptions for both static and digital signage. The digital signage exemptions are limited given the difficulties presented in developing deemed to comply criteria without introducing a risk of signage proliferation or traffic safety concerns, noting that digital signage is far more prominent and visible than a static sign.
However, the policy does include exemptions for digital Pylon Signs associated with school establishments and Window Signs within a Commercial or Business zone. This exemption is subject to the signage being located on a Local Distributor road or lower, on the advice of the City’s Traffic Services. These types of signs are considered to represent an acceptable level of development and do not present a risk of unnecessary signage proliferation or traffic safety.
LPP 4.6 already includes exemptions for static advertising signage where the proposal satisfies the relevant signage type criteria. Further, works to change the content of a signage panel previously approved by the City are also exempt from requiring further development approval, as outlined in Part 1 of LPP 4.6.
At the time of writing this report only 18 standalone signage applications had been submitted to the City this financial year (from 1 July 2020), which included the following:
· Three applications for Illuminated Street Signs submitted by the City that require approval under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and cannot be exempt through LPP 4.6;
· One Metronet signage application submitted by NewWest Alliance and one digital signage application for a Pylon Sign at a public school. These applications required determination by the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage and Department of Education respectively, as they are considered public works and cannot be exempt through LPP 4.6; and
· Three applications for estate signage throughout the City, which require development applications to control proliferation and the installation of signage on City managed land.
A number of the other signage applications received related to the rebranding of commercial developments with numerous signs, and typically proposed multiple advertising formats.
As such, the City currently receives a limited number of planning applications that relate specifically to advertising signs. Usually, signage will either form part of a broader development application seeking approval for the use of the land (e.g. for a Showroom or Shop), or is already exempt if the signage is contained within a previously approved signage panel. The applications made by the City and NewWest Alliance are a result of approval processes that are required under the MRS and Planning and Development Act 2005, which cannot be exempt through LPP 4.6.
It is also noted that only one digital advertising signage application (Pylon Sign at a public school) has been received since 1 July 2020, and as the proposal was classed as public works LPP 4.6 was not applicable.
Traffic
An objective of LPP 4.6 is to ‘achieve advertising signs that are not misleading or dangerous to vehicular or pedestrian traffic’. Therefore, all signage whether digital or static must be acceptable from a road safety perspective, irrespective of a signs compliance with the design standards of LPP 4.6 (i.e. size, dimensions etc.). Notwithstanding the policy objectives, it is not deemed appropriate to include traffic safety assessment provisions within LPP 4.6, as this is a separate consideration that is reviewed by the City’s Traffic Services.
Traffic Services has advised that they currently consider digital advertising signage against Main Roads’ Advertising Signs Policy. Main Roads Policy was originally developed for application against Main Roads own network (e.g. Mitchell Freeway, Tonkin Highway, Wanneroo Road). However, as a more modern form of advertising with limited assessment controls, Main Roads Policy has been adopted as the most suitable assessment tool for digital signage proposals.
LPP 4.6 has included within the ‘Assessment Considerations’ section that digital signage applications may be required to demonstrate they are safe from a road safety perspective, and encourages applicants to contact the City prior to lodgement. This is considered to be the most measured approach given there are a number of factors that determine if a digital sign may contribute to a potential road safety issue, including the location and size of a sign, hierarchy of the road, proximity to an intersection, proposed luminance and the frequency at which the advertising content is proposed to change.
As such, Administration is unable to outline in Policy form when a traffic assessment should or should not be required. This will be determined on a case by case basis on the advice of Traffic Services. This also acknowledges that a number of smaller scale digital signs (e.g. window signs, school signs) are unlikely to require a traffic report in support of the proposal.
Conclusion
Administration acknowledges that signage is an evolving matter with varying levels of acceptance within the community, and can be contentious. Draft LPP 4.6 is therefore considered to represent a balanced and considered approach to dealing with the application of digital technology. All other changes proposed are considered minor modifications that improve the format and legibility of the policy.
Statutory Compliance
The review of LPP 4.6 has been prepared in accordance with Division 2 – Local Planning Policies of the Deemed Provisions which outlines the procedures for how a local government may amend a local planning policy.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.4 Activated Places
3.4.3 Enhance distinctive built form and spaces based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO O01 Relationship Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The review of LPP 4.6 has been undertaken by Administration to ensure that the City achieves its strategic goals and by conforming to current statutory and legislative provisions through the use of local planning policies.
Financial Implications
The inclusion of additional exemptions for digital signage within LPP 4.6 will have a negligible financial implication. As discussed in the body of the report, this financial year (at the time of writing) the City had not received any digital signage applications that required consideration under LPP 4.6 or the payment of a planning application fee.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Division 2 – Part 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, resolves to ADOPT Draft Local Planning Policy 4.6: Advertising Signs, as contained in Attachment 3, for the purpose of advertising; and
2. ADVERTISES Local Planning Policy 4.6: Advertising Signs for a period of 42 days by way of the following:
a) Notification in the Wanneroo Times at the commencement of the advertising period; and
b) Publishing draft LPP 4.6 on the City’s website and making it available for viewing at the City’s Civic Centre.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Unmarked Current LPP 4.6 |
21/147298 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Marked-up current LPP 4.6 |
21/147371 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Draft LPP 4.6 for Advertising |
21/147382 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Summary of Modifications to LPP 4.6 |
21/150584 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Digital Wall Sign at Ashby Neighbourhood Centre |
21/198035 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 - Business Zoned Land in Wangara |
21/198042 |
|
|
7⇩. |
Attachment 7 - Digital Billboard Cnr Ocean Reef Road/Fortitude Boulevard |
21/198054 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 100
4.5 Preparation of Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2 and Revocation of the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52
File Ref: 42468 – 21/168509
Responsible Officer: Director Planning and Sustainability
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider initiating Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, to normalise the zoning of land affected by the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52.
Background
The preparation and operation of the City’s structure plans is undertaken pursuant to the Deemed Provisions of the City’s DPS 2 (Deemed Provisions). The Deemed Provisions are established through Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations). The Deemed Provisions define and set out the purpose of a structure plan as follows:
structure plan means a plan for the coordination of future subdivision and zoning of an area of land
Many of the City’s structure plans are necessary planning instruments to guide ongoing subdivision and zoning of land. However, the City has a growing number of structure plans that are either already or will shortly become redundant, as their subject areas are subdivided and built out.
The Western Australian planning framework intends that once a structure plan has achieved its purpose of guiding the zoning and subdivision of land, the land would be zoned under a local planning scheme (such as DPS 2) via a scheme amendment, a process referred to as ‘normalising’. Considerations could also be made at that time for a structure plan to be entirely revoked, if it is no longer needed to serve its initial purpose to guide the subdivision and initial development of land.
Council at its previous meetings has already resolved to request the WAPC revoke various other structure plans, and to initiate coinciding amendments to DPS 2 (Amendment No. 187, Amendment No. 189 and Amendment No, 190) to normalise the zoning of affected land. In previously reporting to Council (initially on 17 November 2020, PS08-11/20), Administration discussed the staged approach that will be progressively undertaken toward ‘normalising’ and revoking structure plans that are no longer required. Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, being subject to this Report, forms part of the structure plan revocation and normalisation programming being progressed by Administration.
Detail
Administration considers that the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52 (ASP 52) is ready for revocation, as it has completed its function in guiding subdivision in its respective area.
To revoke ASP 52, normalisation needs to first occur under DPS 2. As such, Administration is also proposing that the City initiate (or ‘prepare’ in the context of the Planning and Development Act 2005) Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2 to facilitate the normalisation.
Normalisation will include bringing in the zonings and density codes shown on the ASP 52 maps, and imposing them onto the DPS 2 map. A Scheme Amendment Map, which shows the extent of normalisation required, is provided in Attachment 1. Location maps and current structure plan mapping are provided within Attachment 2.
Amendment No. 192 also proposes to insert a retail floorspace limitation of 1,000sqm that ASP 52 imposes for its Commercial zoned land (located at Lot 1900(10) Clew Way, Jindalee) into Schedule 3 of DPS 2.
Administration considers that proposed Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2 meets the following criteria for ‘Standard Amendments’ in the context of Regulation 34 of the Regulations:
An amendment to the scheme so that it is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area, other than an amendment that is a basic amendment.
An amendment that would have minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment.
Consultation
Should Council resolve to prepare Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, the amendment will need to be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) pursuant to Section 81 and 82 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. The EPA will assess the environmental impacts of the proposal and to determine whether any formal environmental assessment is necessary.
Subject to no objections being received from the EPA, the amendment must be advertised for public comment for a period of at least 42 days. Advertising is to occur in the following manner, pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015:
· Publish a notice of the amendment on the City’s website – and where practicable, upload the amendment documentation;
· Where appropriate, publish a notice in a newspaper circulating in the relevant locality;
· Notify public authorities likely to be affected by the amendment; and
· Advertise the amendment as directed by the WAPC and in any other way the local government considers appropriate.
In addition to the above, Administration will write to landowners and occupiers of land that it considers could be affected by the DPS 2 amendment.
Comment
Information and mapping from Administration pertaining to ASP 52 is included in Attachment 2. The information in Attachment 2 provides aerial imagery, structure plan mapping and Administration’s review of how the structure plan provisions have been met.
Administration has identified that subdivision has been completed on the land within ASP 52; and as such, that structure plan could be revoked. Development also occupies all lots affected by ASP 52; except a vacant portion of Lot 1378 (6) Jindalee Boulevard, Jindalee, which is subject to a development approval recently granted by the City (under Delegated Authority).
The City considers that there are adequate controls through DPS 2 to guide any further development, should it occur. Development would not require guidance from ASP 52, as demonstrated in the table included within Attachment 2.
A corresponding amendment to DPS 2 is firstly required to facilitate the later (proposed) revocation of ASP 52. Administration has therefore prepared Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, to place the zonings, density codes and retail floorspace limitations found in ASP 52 into DPS 2. To undertake the normalisation and revocation in an orderly manner, the WAPC would only be able to consider the revocation of ASP 52 should the Minister for Planning first approve Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2.
The Regulations (Regulation 35A) make provision for when an amendment to a local planning scheme affects a structure plan area, the amendment must include a statement that when the amendment takes effect:
(a) the approval of the structure plan is to be revoked; or
(b) the structure plan is to be amended in accordance with the statement; or
(c) the approval of the structure plan is not affected.
In this case, and in light of the Regulations, Amendment No. 192 will include a statement that on its approval, the WAPC’s approval of ASP 52 will be revoked.
Pursuant to Clause 28(3) and Clause 29A(1) of the Deemed Provisions, it is the WAPC that may revoke its approval of a structure plan. In other words, the City has no ability to revoke structure plans, but rather must request the WAPC undertake that process. Such a request should be made pursuant to a Council resolution, when Amendment No. 192 is presented back to a future Council Meeting following advertising.
Statutory Compliance
Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, being prepared to facilitate a future revocation of the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52, can be processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Following the Minister for Planning’s approval of Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, the revocation of the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52 could then occur pursuant to the deemed provisions for local planning schemes, provided in Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The WAPC acknowledges in its Structure Plan Framework document (the Framework) that it may revoke its approval of a structure plan under the Deemed Provisions. One of the most common circumstances stated in the Framework is when a local planning scheme is amended to include a zoning over the land covered by the structure plan, following the finalisation of the subdivision of the land.
Financial Implications
The costs of preparing Amendment No. 192 to DPS 2, and preparing the subsequent request to the WAPC to revoke ASP 52 can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. Pursuant to Section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, PREPARES Amendment No. 192 to City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No. 2, to amend the local planning scheme by:
a) Rezoning Lot 1377 (6) Cockleshell Brace, Jindalee and Lot 1378 (6) Jindalee Boulevard, Jindalee from ‘Urban Development’ to ‘Business’ with a residential density code of R60, as shown on the Scheme (Amendment) Map (included in Attachment 1 of this Report);
b) Rezoning Lot 1900 (10) Clew Way, Jindalee from ‘Urban Development’ to ‘Commercial’ with a residential density code of R60, as shown on the Scheme (Amendment) Map (included in Attachment 1 of this Report);
c) Rezoning the following lots from ‘Urban Development’ to ‘Residential’ with a residential density code of R40:
· Lot 1874 (38) Investigator Parade, Jindalee
· Lot 1875 (36) Investigator Parade, Jindalee;
· Lot 1869 (8) Clew Way, Jindalee;
· Lot 1870 (6) Clew way, Jindalee;
· Lot 1871 (5) Clew Way, Jindalee;
· Lot 1872 (7) Clew Way, Jindalee; and
· Lot 1873 (9) Clew Way, Jindalee,
as shown on the Scheme (Amendment) Map (included in Attachment 1 of this Report); and
d) Amending Schedule 3 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 to insert the following:
|
LOCALITY |
DESCRIPTION OF CENTRE AND COMMERCIAL ZONES |
NLA (m2) |
|
JINDALEE |
Lot 1900 on Deposited Plan 401242 (10) Clew Way |
1000 |
2. Pursuant to Regulation 35A(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 include the following statement:
Approval of the City of Wanneroo’s Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52 is to be revoked when this amendment is approved and takes effect.
3. Pursuant to Regulation 34 and Regulation 35(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, RESOLVES that Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 is a standard amendment for the following reasons:
a) An amendment to the scheme so that it is consistent with a region planning scheme that applies to the scheme area, other than an amendment that is a basic amendment.
b) An amendment that would have minimal impact on land in the scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment.
4. Pursuant to Section 81 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, REFERS Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Environmental Protection Authority;
5. Subject to approval from the Environmental Protection Authority, ADVERTISES Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 for a period of not less than 42 days pursuant to Regulation 47 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
6. NOTES that a further Report will be presented to a future Council Meeting, following advertising of Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, seeking resolution in respect to the following:
a) Whether to not support or support Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 (with or without modification);
b) To provide the advertised Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the WAPC; and
c) Subject to Council supporting Amendment No. 192 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, requesting the WAPC consider revoking the Brighton West Village Centre Agreed Structure Plan No. 52.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Scheme Amendment Map - Amendment 192 to DPS 2 - Normalisation of Brighton West Village ASP 52 |
21/192294 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Supporting Information for Reports - Brighton West Village Structure Plan No. 52 |
21/192664 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 112
Assets
File Ref: 3120V07 – 21/145124
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a review of the City’s current Local Area Traffic Management Policy in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure Framework requirements.
Background
Council policies are adopted by Council for the purpose of ensuring that the City meets its strategic objectives. Incorporated into all Council policies is a scheduled review date to ensure that policies remain current and that Elected Members are provided with a timely opportunity to review them.
The Local Area Traffic Management Policy (LATMP) was approved by Council at its meeting on 30 July 2019, Item No AS07-07/19 refers. This report provides details of minor amendments.
Detail
Minor changes have been made to this policy to increase the assessment score for all residential roads where the operating (85th percentile) speed is higher than the posted speed limit. Attachments 1 and 2 show the final draft and marked up version, refer to attachment 2 to review the following changes:
1. Minor grammar and punctuation edits made. Highlighted in red text;
2. Additional areas added to ‘No Investigation’ criteria, being “Areas that are zoned rural, special rural or industrial” to clarify those areas where the installation of traffic management treatments are not appropriate;
3. Adjustments made to table ‘5.1 Speed’, with 1 additional point awarded per km/h to the 85th percentile speed (km/h) exceeding the posted speed limit between 0-10 km/h; and
4. Table ‘5.2 Traffic Volumes’ has point system rescaled. Local Distributors with <2000 Vehicles per day will no longer have a deduction of points.
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with the relevant stakeholders and the Policy has been reviewed in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure review process.
Comment
The LATMP is intended to prioritise those roads with higher than desired operating (85th percentile) speeds or other safety issues and has provided a good framework for the City to assess all traffic issues and enabled a consistent approach in decision making, however over time discrepancies in the policy have been identified.
A comparative assessment of the LATMP priority scores has highlighted some minor issues, with the main one being that the policy scoring system does not provide sufficient priority for those roads with an operating speed greater than the posted speed limit, or those roads with a high operating speed, but with comparatively low traffic volumes.
Using the suggested revisions to the Policy, reassessment of the LATMP priority scores for those roads that have previously been assessed increases the number of roads determined to be a “Technical Problem Site”, generally requiring physical infrastructure changes, from 7 to 14. There is a similar level of increase in the number of roads identified as a “Minor Technical Problem Site” requiring non capital solutions. Should the Policy be revised as suggested, then the Traffic Treatments programme in the Long Term Capital Plan will be updated to include those additional roads.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-023 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure and Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Assets and Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/ Corporate risk register.
Policy Implications
This policy has been recommended for review as a result of an evaluation and review process undertaken in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s Policy Register.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the revised Local Area Traffic Management Policy as shown in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - LATMP Final |
21/145442 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - LATMP Policy Original mark up |
21/145445 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 131
File Ref: 2409V03 – 21/160652
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a review of the City’s current Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure Framework requirements.
Background
Council policies are adopted by Council for the purpose of ensuring that the City meets its strategic objectives. Incorporated into all Council policies is a scheduled review date to ensure that policies remain current and that Council Members are provided with a timely opportunity to review them.
The Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy was approved by Council at its meeting on 18 September 2018, Item No AS01-09/18 refers. This report recommends that no changes are made to the current Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy other than minor administrative changes.
Detail
A review of the bus stops assessed under the policy has not indicated that any changes to the priority for infrastructure determined by policy are required. The recommended changes are administrative only.
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with the relevant stakeholders and the Policy has been reviewed in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure review process.
Comment
The Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy has provided a good framework for the City to assess all existing bus shelters as well as future locations within the City and has enabled a consistent approach in decision making.
The intent of the policy has not changed and therefore all amendments are considered to be legislative in nature. The policy will continue to be applied in its current form.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term financial Planning |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risk/s relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate Risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The policy has been recommended for review as a result of an evaluation and review process undertaken in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s Policy Register.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES the revision of the Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy as shown in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Final Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy |
21/163898 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Original Mark Up Bus Stop Infrastructure Policy |
21/163580 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 146
File Ref: 3120V07 – 21/145155
Responsible Officer: Director Assets
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider a review of the City’s current Pathway Policy in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure Framework requirements.
Background
Council policies are adopted by Council for the purpose of ensuring that the City meets its strategic objectives. Incorporated into all Council policies is a scheduled review date to ensure that policies remain current and that Council Members are provided with a timely opportunity to review them.
The Pathways Policy was approved by Council at its meeting on 30 July 2019, Item No AS07-07/19 refers. This report provides details of minor amendments.
Detail
Minor changes have been made to this policy. Attachments 1 and 2 show the final draft and marked up version, refer to attachment 2 to review the following changes:
1. Minor grammar and punctuation edits made. Highlighted in red text;
2. Titles of multiple Australian Standards and guidelines have been changed due to being superseded and now align with current titles. Changes highlighted in yellow;
3. Phrasing of dot point 2 in ‘Part B’ reworded to provide further clarity for the construction of footpaths leading to a Public Access Way (PAW);
4. Table ‘(A) Trip Attractors’ now include aged care homes as part of the criterion; and
5. Table ‘(D) Network Connectivity’ has had its scoring reworked, the main purpose of the amendment is to reduce the priority afforded to upgrading existing pathways and is described in detail and highlighted in blue;
6. Table ‘(F) Cycle Network’ has been added into the policy to reflect the endorsement of the “Department of Transport Long Term Cycle Network for the City of Wanneroo” (Item AS01-06/20 refers.);
7. ‘Figure 1’ has been adjusted so that table headings and contents are more descriptive and easily understandable; and
8. ‘Figure 1’, ‘Pedestrian/Cyclist’ column adjusted. Minimum required pathway width reduced from 2.5m to 2-2.5m for specific road types as per the Australian standard for minimum shared pathways width.
9. ‘Figure 1’, Additional note added to indicate that in areas where the pedestrian and / or cyclist demand is high, then the standard of infrastructure provided should be increased accordingly.
Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with the relevant stakeholders and the Policy has been reviewed in accordance with the City’s Policy and Procedure review process.
Comment
The Pathways policy has provided a good framework for the City to assess all pathway issues and enabled a consistent approach in decision making, however over time discrepancies in the policy have been identified. A comparative assessment of the pathway priority scores has highlighted some minor issues, with the main one being that the policy indicates that it is more important to upgrade an existing pathway than to provide new infrastructure to areas that currently do not have a safe pedestrian facility.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“3 Environment (Built)
3.5 Connected and Accessible City
3.5.1 Deliver local transport infrastructure including roads, footpaths and cycle ways to improve accessibility”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-023 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community and Place |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure and Utility Planning |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Assets and Director Planning & Sustainability |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/ Corporate risk register
Policy Implications
This policy has been recommended for review as a result of an evaluation and review process undertaken in accordance with the City of Wanneroo’s Policy Register.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ADOPTS the revision of the Pathways Policy as shown in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Pathways Policy - Final |
21/145380 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Pathways Policy - Original mark up |
21/145379 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 175
Community & Place
File Ref: 39464 – 21/157539
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 5
Previous Items: CP01-03/21 - Fragola Park Master Plan - Ordinary Council - 16 Mar 2021 6:00pm
Issue
To consider the concept design and community engagement outcomes for the upgrade of Fragola Park, Landsdale.
Background
Fragola Park (the Park) is an existing passive park located at 484 Kingsway, Landsdale (Attachment 1). Apart from two cricket nets and football (AFL) goals, there are no existing amenities on site and a GIS investigation indicates the following:
|
Item |
Current Status |
|
Park Size / Hierarchy |
1.97 ha / Neighbourhood Passive Park |
|
Reserve No. |
N/A |
|
Lot No. |
1 |
|
Property Type |
Not listed |
|
Ownership |
City of Wanneroo Freehold |
|
Aboriginal Sites |
None listed on GIS |
|
Bush Forever |
None listed on GIS. |
Other existing public open spaces within a walkable catchment of the Park (400m - 800m or 5-10 minute walk) include:
|
Park |
Location |
Comment |
|
Alhambra Park |
2 Alhambra Pky, Landsdale- 230m north |
Passive park with play equipment |
|
Donatello Park |
28 Donatello Dr, Landsdale – 252m west |
Passive park with play equipment |
|
Monticello Park |
2 Monticello Mdr, Landsdale- 356m north |
Passive park with play equipment |
|
Versailles Park |
30 Versailles Trn, LANDSDALE – 367m north |
Passive park with play equipment |
|
Rousham Park |
2 Rousham Rd, LANDSDALE – 445m north |
Passive park with open space |
|
Hepburn Park |
357 Alexander Drive, LANDSDALE – 613m south |
Undeveloped park |
|
Strathpine Park |
21 Strathpine CH, LANDSDALE – 617m west |
Passive park with open space |
|
Arduaine Park |
51 Emmetts Rd, LANDSDALE – 619m north |
Passive park with open space |
Administration was approached in 2019 by the Carnaby Rise Primary School Parents and Citizens (P&C) Committee regarding the lack of suitable play equipment on the site for older children (aged five and above). As a result, Administration commenced a concept design process in order to test the viability of playground equipment provision, as well as the potential for the future development of the site as a whole.
Detail
Concept Development
Administration has prepared two draft concept designs (Attachment 2 & 3) for the upgrade to the Park. The proposed upgrade inclusions are outlined in the table below:
|
Element |
Description |
|
Play Equipment |
Common Elements · Triple swing all access; · Nature Play; · Car Parking; · Accessible Water Fountain; · Shade Sail; · Toilet Block (200sqm); · Accessible Seating; and · Full Size Soccer Field / Junior AFL field.
Option 1 – separate area for younger and older children · Older years combination unit; · Younger years combination unit; and · Talk Tubes.
Option 2 - combined age group elements · Younger years combination unit (Space theme); · Older years combination unit; · Moving Equipment; · Rocker; and · Sand / Sensory Play.
|
|
Path Network |
From new carpark in the north, and a path from Fragola Way (to the south).
Note: The path would need to be constructed on Department of Education (DoE) land, and requires their permission to construct. |
|
Car Park |
Capacity for 13 bays plus an ACROD bay, with consideration of school drop off and pick up. |
|
Future Building |
No purpose has been assigned to this building, though it should at least include toilets.
Should the Park be deemed an active reserve in the future, an amenities building including change rooms will need to be considered. |
The proposed designs for the Park seek to meet the passive leisure activity demands of current and future users of the Park. The upgrade is consistent with the City’s existing level of provision for Neighbourhood Parks, as outlined in LPP 4.3, noting that the upgrades will be available for general community use.
Both draft design options allow for the development of the park as a single stage for construction. The proposed schedule will see design commence in 2021/22, with construction in 2022/23.
Following the presentation of the concept designs to Council at its meeting on 16 March 2021, Council resolved to:
1. ENDORSE the Fragola Park concept designs, for the purposes of public comment, as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 of this report;
2. NOTE that the draft concept designs will be released for public comment for a 28 day period, commencing on 22 March and concluding on 26 April 2021, with the outcome to be reported to Council at the May 2021 meeting;
3. NOTE the draft cost estimate for consideration in the 2021/22 budget process:
|
Year |
Detail |
Total |
Municipal |
Reserve (DCP) |
|
2021/22 |
Survey and Detailed Design |
$80,000 |
- |
$80,000 |
|
2022/23 |
Construction |
$699,378 |
- |
$699,378 |
|
Total |
$779,378 |
- |
$779,378 |
|
4. NOTE the construction of the proposed development is estimated to commence by May 2022 and conclude in June 2022.
Consultation
Public Comment Process
The public comment process was undertaken as per the City’s Community Engagement Policy and was conducted for a 36 day period from 22 March 2021 to 26 April 2021. The public comment process included the following consultation strategy:
· Information provided on the City’s “Your Say” page;
· Advertising for feedback on the City’s various social media platforms;
· Letters to residents within 400m of the Park;
· Direct communication with relevant stakeholders including:
o Carnaby Rise Primary School
o Carnaby Rise Primary School P&C.
The endorsed concept plans were advertised for public consideration and a consultation letter (including concept designs and costings) (Attachment 4) advising of the opportunity to comment on the proposal, was sent to 494 properties that surround the Park. This information was also emailed to the Carnaby Rise Primary School and Carnaby Rise Primary School P&C.
The consultation period was advertised on the City’s ‘Your Say’ section on the website with links provided on the City’s Facebook page, and an onsite meeting held for residents on Wednesday 21 April 2021 from 3:30pm to 5:00pm.
Public Comment Outcomes
At the close of the consultation period, Administration received 242 responses, of which 231 (95.5%) of respondents supported the provision of the upgrades and 11 (4.4%) of respondents did not support the upgrades.
· Of the 231 respondents in favour of the upgrade, 162 (76.1%) indicated a preference for Option 2 (Attachment 3), with 51 (23.9%) preferring Option 1 (Attachment 2);
· Of the 242 responses, there was a tie in the preference regarding the future building location, with 100 (50%) listing there preference for either north (near the play equipment) or south (on the south side of the park).
A summary of the comments received in favour of the project are as follows:
· There is a lack of amenities at the park at the moment. There is also plenty of room for a playground. There is not much else within a kilometre radius of our house.
· Giving the kids in the area another choice to play and a good space for multitude of activities.
· It is a growing community and there is not enough play areas for our children.
· The area is currently in not the best condition, with most the bushland taking over.
· Provide play environment for the school and after school play for parents as well as community.
· Support very much, just concerned with parking availability.
· Whilst the playground and future amenities building is welcomed, we still need to manage parking options for parents and carers to drop off and pick up students from Carnaby Rise. The bush area is currently used well by parents and carers as an overflow option and often has 30+ vehicles using this space in the mornings and afternoons.
· Reduces hooning in carpark. More families will access area.
A summary of the main reasons for the proposal not being supported has been included below:
· I don't like either option very much. Could do something different. I think there is a lot of parks nearby. Better IMO to upgrade Monticello playground for example and put something different at Fragola.
· Will lose valuable parking space for Carnaby Rise PS.
· It will take away carpark spaces that are needed for the school.
· I agree with the plans for the playground etc. but the parking is already a massive issue at Carnaby Rise so to lose all of that parking would be awful. About 50 cars park here every day.
Comment
Following the engagement period, it was clear there was support for the upgrade of the park to include the playground, pathway and some car parking. However, there were some recurring comments that require further attention:
Parking
Feedback indicated that the construction of the car park would result in there being less available parking for the adjacent school for the morning and afternoon school drop off and pick up. There have been estimates of up to 50 to 70 cars using this space for parking per day.
For the playground to be constructed, the northern location is the most appropriate. As such, the progression of the upgrade will impact the available parking. Based on the feedback provided, Administration has refined the concept design (Attachment 5). The design update includes:
· The featured elements of Option 2 (Space Team Play Equipment);
· Refined driveway;
· Mountable kerbs to allow access to under-developed area for parking;
· Seven parking bays (including one ACROD Bay); and
· Allowable space for construction of the future building either north or south.
The design development process for the future car park will take into consideration its use before and after school.
Equipment Location
The location of the proposed equipment was questioned, with some responses asking for the play equipment to be located to the south of the oval.
The northern site is the preferred location for the play equipment given its proximity to the school and more favourable site conditions. In addition to this, the southern part of the oval serves as a drainage sump, and any alteration to this area will require further investigation and likely require the drainage to be relocated. Should the sump remain, the available space for equipment construction would be restricted.
Future Building
Comments were received regarding the potential future purpose of the building. This will be subject to future design and consultation, however the minimum expectation is the provision of a Male and Female toilet, plus a Universal Access Toilet (UAT).
Statutory Compliance
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder relationships |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans have been developed to manage these risks to improve the existing management systems.
Policy Implications
The City's Local Planning Policy 4.3 Public Open Spaces was used as the guiding framework for the development of the draft concept plan. The community consultation process was undertaken as per the City’s Community Engagement Policy
Financial Implications
The total estimated project costs have been summarised in the table below:
|
Item |
Option 2 |
|
Playground |
$248,840 |
|
Path |
$68,000 |
|
Car Park and Access |
$211,910 |
|
Other Project Fees |
$250,628 |
|
TOTAL |
$779,378 |
Part 9 of the City of Wanneroo District Planning Scheme No.2 (DPS 2) outlines the developer contribution arrangements (DCP) for East Wanneroo Cells 1 – 9. Schedule 6 of DPS2 defines the General and Specific Cell Works for Cell 9, which includes the provision of 10% for public open space (POS) and the cost of developing the POS to a basic standard. The Cell 9 DCP identifies Fragola Park as a Neighbourhood Sport POS and defines a range of infrastructure that is required, including earthworks, irrigation, lighting, bollards, play equipment, shade structures, picnic settings and associated recreation and sports infrastructure.
This portion of Fragola Park was initially landscaped to a basic standard by the Department of Education and the City or Wanneroo as part of the construction of the Carnaby Rise Primary School in 2016. The Cell 9 DCP funds have not yet been utilised for the development of this POS area and funding is available to complete the remaining POS infrastructure. In this regard, the proposed development options for POS Area 12 have been reviewed by Administration and are consistent with the scope of works intended to be funded by the DCP. It is also noted that in May 2020, Council approved the revised cost estimates for Cell 9 and that the Cell 9 DCP currently holds adequate funds to complete the required works.
As per the above, this report seeks to make available the amount of $779,378 from the East Wanneroo DCP for the construction of the playground at Fragola Park as outlined below:
|
Year |
Detail |
Total |
Municipal |
Reserve (DCP) |
|
2021/22 |
Survey and Detailed Design |
$80,000 |
- |
$80,000 |
|
2022/23 |
Construction |
$699,378 |
- |
$699,378 |
|
Total |
$779,378 |
- |
$779,378 |
|
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. NOTES the outcome of the Fragola Park Upgrade community engagement process undertaken from 22 March to 26 April 2021, that resulted in the following outcomes:
a) Of the 231 respondents in favour of the upgrade, 162 (76.1%) indicated a preference for Option 2 (Attachment 3), with 51 (23.9%) preferring Option 1 (Attachment 2);
b) Of the 242 responses, there was a tie in the preference regarding the future building location, with 100 (50%) listing there preference for either north (near the play equipment) or south (on the south side of the park);
2. ENDORSES Option 2 (Attachment 3) as the guiding concept for the upgrade at Fragola Park;
3. NOTES the draft cost estimate for consideration in the 2021/22 budget process:
|
Year |
Detail |
Total |
Municipal |
Reserve (DCP) |
|
2021/22 |
Survey and Detailed Design |
$80,000 |
- |
$80,000 |
|
2022/23 |
Construction |
$699,378 |
- |
$699,378 |
|
Total |
$779,378 |
- |
$779,378 |
|
4. NOTES the listing of this project in the draft 2021/22 Capital Works Program and Long Term Financial Plan, to be funded from DCP Cell 9 funds, for the amounts as listed in Recommendation 3 above; and
5. NOTES the construction of the proposed development is estimated to commence by May 2022 and conclude in June 2022.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Fragola Park, Landsdale |
20/567699 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Fragola Park - Concept Design - Option 1 |
21/55406 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Fragola Park - Concept Design - Option 2 |
21/55408 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Letter - Community Engagement - Fragola Park Upgrade |
20/567118 |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 - Fragola Park - Updated Concept Design - Post Engagement |
21/199774 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 187
Community Safety & Emergency Management Report
File Ref: 3077V02 – 21/180153
Responsible Officer: Director Community and Place
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Previous Items: Cr Linda Aitken - Frederick Stubbs Gate Closure Time Review - Ordinary Council - 16 Feb 2021 6:00pm
Issue
To provide feedback on a Motion on Notice considered by Council in February 2021 and the subsequent community consultation undertaken in relation to the closing time of the Frederick Stubbs carpark gates.
Background
In 2003 Council resolved to set opening and closing times of seven gates across the City due to concerns of anti-social behaviour. This included Frederick Stubbs Car Park in Quinns Rocks. The car park is now accessed via a gate that is manually opened at 6am and closed at 10pm (in the summer months) and 8pm (in the winter months) by Administration.
In February 2021 a Motion on Notice was put forward to consider closing the Frederick Stubbs gates at 8pm year round following concerns raised by some members of the community regarding a perceived increase in anti-social behaviour and hooning in the carpark. The Council resolution on this Motion on Notice was:
That Administration is requested to prepare a report for a future Council meeting to consider a proposal to amend the closure time of the Frederick Stubbs carpark to 8pm all year round to reduce anti-social and hooning behaviour.
Detail
Frederick Stubbs car park is located on Ocean Drive in Quinns Rocks and accessed via a gated entrance. The car park is situated below the road level and receives little to no passive surveillance. Due to previous reports of anti-social behaviour at the location, the carpark is currently locked overnight with times varying between the winter and summer months. A map of the location of gate at the car park is included as Attachment 1.
In
2020 Administration received five complaints relating to anti-social behaviour
and five customer requests relating to the opening or closing of the gates.
Discussions with the Clarkson Police have indicated that they have received one complaint for the Frederick Stubbs carpark area that was in March 2020. This related to a report of a large numbers of youths in the area. Upon attendance, no youths were sighted.
In response to increased reports of anti-social behaviour at Frederick Stubbs Park, in December 2020 and in consultation with the officers at the Clarkson Police station, a temporary CCTV pole was installed in January 2021 to act as a deterrent and to observe activity in the carpark for a three-month period. The CCTV pole remained on site until the conclusion of the April school holidays and was removed on 20 April 2021.
Although there has been no evidence of anti-social behaviour found by the Police and only one complaint made to them in 2020, the temporary CCTV pole was installed due to the unique location of the car park and the lack of available passive surveillance to address community concerns. The Clarkson Police had direct access to view live and archived footage from the pole meaning that any report of anti-social behaviour could be followed up. Administration did not receive any complaints while the CCTV tower was on site or since it was removed.
The City is proposing to seek funding through the 2021/22 budget to install automatic gates and fixed CCTV at the seven carpark locations including Frederick Stubbs Park. In the meantime, consultation has been undertaken with the community to determine the level of community support for closing the carpark gates earlier at Frederick Stubbs Park to reduce anti-social and hooning behaviour.
Consultation
Administration has consulted with the community to determine the appetite to close the gates at 8pm year round. As part of the consultation process community members were offered the opportunity to complete a survey monkey questionnaire in which they were offered three choices in relation to closing times of the gates, as well as an option to provide additional information that they would like the City to consider as part of this consultation.
The three options offered in the survey were:
1. Reduce the closing time of the gates to 8pm all year round;
2. Increase the closing time of the gates to 10pm all year round; or
3. Keep the closing time of the gates as they currently are (8pm in winter and 10pm in summer).
Full details of the responses provided are available in Attachment 2.
The consultation was opened on 8 April 2021 and closed on 30 April 2021 and was communicated via the City’s social media pages as well as through the Quinns Rocks Residents Association.
Comment
The Frederick Stubbs car park is well used by local community members and as demonstrated by the number of responses to the consultation, adjusting the closing time of the gates is an issue that many community members feel strongly about.
The survey was open for a period of three weeks and received 178 responses. The responses were distributed as follows:
The results indicate that the community is divided between the three options. Whilst the option to increase the closing times to 10pm year round is on its own the most supported, the difference is not significant. In terms of actual responses, only nine more people preferred this option from a total of 178.
If it is assumed that people who selected the option to reduce the closing time to 8pm year round, had selected the keep at current closing times in the absence of a reduction option, it could be extrapolated that the community is not in favour of increasing the gate closing time to 10pm year round. This assumption can be made as keeping the gates closed from 8pm at least part of the time would be preferable to those people, than having the gates closed at 10pm year round.
Given the responses to the survey, it is recommended that a precautionary approach be taken and the status quo is retained. It is likely that the installation of CCTV cameras will reduce the concerns of some members of the community who were seeking for the gates to be closed at 8pm year round. It is also noted that the installation of automatic gates will result in the gates being opened and closed on time, whereas manual opening and closing of the gates is subject to availability of staff resources that may be impacted by a range of factors.
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.2 Safe Communities
1.2.1 Enable community to be prepared and to recover from emergency situations”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-023 Safety of Community |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Community & Place |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk registers. Action plans are in place/have been developed to manage and mitigate this risk.
Alignment with all risk appetite statements should be considered in particular, 1.2 Safe Communities.
The City places a high priority on the safety of its community particularly in the public realm and the importance of hazard and risk identification, management and reduction. Primarily, the City seeks to protect life over property and will not tolerate any deliberate act or omission by any party that jeopardises that objective. Subject to a rigorous cost/benefit analysis, the City’s property will also be protected and assets insured. Legislation governs the City’s activities including the Local Emergency Preparedness Plan to ensure the safety of the Community. The City places a high priority on the safety of its Volunteers and staff and will support operating models that achieve and represent the most effective model to ensure the safety of its volunteers. Therefore the City will accept a moderate risk to reputation, low risk to financial and safety.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Funding for the installation of automatic gates and CCTV at seven locations across the City is included for consideration in the 2021/22 Budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. APPROVES the retention of the closing time of the gates at Frederick Stubbs Park being 8pm in the winter months and 10pm in the summer months; and
2. RECOGNISES and THANKS the community for its involvement in the consultation process on this matter.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Map of the location of gate at the Frederick Stubbs Park Car Park |
21/233488 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Frederick Stubbs car park opening times community engagement - Survey Monkey responses - April 2021 |
21/187203 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 206
Corporate Strategy & Performance
File Ref: 37350V02 – 21/189040
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 6
Issue
For Council to consider the Financial Activity Statement (FAS) for the period ended 30 April 2021.
Background
In accordance with Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the Financial Activity Statement has been prepared in compliance with the following:
“Regulation 34(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to prepare a statement of financial activity each month, presented according to nature and type, by program, or by business unit. The statement of financial activity will be presented by nature and type.
Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, which requires a local government to adopt a percentage or value, calculated in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, to be used in statements of financial activity for reporting material variances. 10% and a value greater than $100,000 will be used for the reporting of variances.”
Detail
Council adopted the Annual Budget for the 2020-21 financial year on 20 July 2020 (SCS01-07/20). The mid-year review (MYR) was conducted in January and adopted by Council on 16 February 2021 (CS03-02/21). The budget changes proposed in the Financial Activity Statement (FAS) for the period ended 28 February 2021 have been included in this report as the report was adopted on 20 April 2021 by Council (CS01-04/21). The figures in this report are compared to the Revised Budget.
Overall Comments Month-to-Date
Results from Operations
The Financial Activity Statement report for the month of April 2021 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations before Non-Operating Revenue and Expenses of $1.0m.
The favourable variance is due to higher revenue of $521k mainly from Rates, Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions and underspends in operating expenditures of $524k mainly from Material & Contracts and Utilities Costs.
Capital Program
During April 2021, $4.4m was spent on various capital projects of which $3.0m was spent on sport facilities and roads (Refer to Attachment 3 for more details). The unfavourable variance is mainly due to delays in the replacement of domestic waste trucks amounting to $3.6m as a result of COVID-19 and the implementation of the Bin Kerbside Collection System amounting to $1.1m.
Overall Comments on Year-to-Date (YTD) Figures
Results from Operations
The Financial Activity Statement year-to-date report of April 2021 shows an overall favourable variance from Operations of $9.8m.
Capital Program
At the end of April 2021, $39.9m was expended on various capital projects of which $20.3m was spent on sports facilities and roads. Further detail on the Capital Works Program is provided on page 13. The estimated carry forward amount will be finalised by the end of May 2021, and will be presented to Council as part of the 2021/22 Budget adoption.
Investment Portfolio Performance
Detailed Analysis of Statement of Comprehensive Income (Attachment 1)
Comments relating to the Statement of Comprehensive Income are provided under the following two sections of this report:
a) Current month comparison of Actuals to Budgets; and
b) Year to date Actuals to Budgets; where the variance is higher than reporting threshold or item of interest to Council.
Revenues
Note 1 Rates
Month to Date - (Actual $579k, Revised Budget $120k)
The variance is favourable by $459k as a result of higher interim rates generated mainly on residential properties than anticipated during the month.
Year to Date - (Actual $136.3m, Revised Budget $136.1m)
The variance is favourable by $219k as a result of higher interim rates generated on commercial properties than anticipated up to April 2021.
Note 2 Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date - (Actual 444k, Revised Budget $265k)
The variance is favourable by $179k mainly due to higher reimbursement income for legal fees related to recovery of Rates than anticipated during the month.
Year to Date - (Actual $10.8m, Revised Budget $10.3m)
The favourable variance of $557k relates to the above reason and early receipt of half of Bushfire Mitigation Activity Fund grant (2020/21 program) amounting to $302k which is put down to be a timing difference.
Note 3 Fees and Charges – Including Waste Service Fee
Month to Date - (Actual $1.4m, Revised Budget $1.4m)
The overall variance of Fees and Charges is unfavourable by $34k, which is within the reportable threshold.
However, as per the below graph (excluding Waste Service fee), the unfavourable variance of $260k is mainly due to lower facilities booking income than anticipated due to closure of some of community facilities as result of the temporary Perth COVID-19 lockdown enforced by State Government directive.
Year to Date - (Actual $46.1m, Revised Budget $45.5m)
The variance is favourable by $600k mainly due to income streams for building assessment services and planning assessment services are running ahead of year to date budgets due to the increased activity in the residential housing sector with new builds taking advantage of the Federal and State stimulus grants. These stimulus grants have now ended. Activity in the approvals area expected to slow down in the coming months.
Expenses
Note 4 Employee Costs
Month to Date - (Actual $6.5m, Revised Budget $6.5m)
The variance is favourable by $6k, which is within the reportable threshold.
Year to Date - (Actual $60.6m, Revised Budget $63.4m)
The variance is favourable by $2.8m due to lower employee costs mainly arising from deferral of recruitments to manage COVID-19 financial impact.
Note 5 Materials & Contracts
Month to Date - (Actual $5.1m, Revised Budget $5.4m)
The favourable variance of $260k is mainly due to:
· Lower consulting fees of $93k due to delays in undertaking of special projects and provision for Infrastructure Asset Management is lower than anticipated;
· Lower contract expenses of $64k for maintenance of bushland due to timing differences;
· Lower external printing expenses of $41k due to limited requirements and greater usage of digital communications; and
· Lower legal fees of $40k.
Year to Date - (Actual $52.0m, Revised Budget $57.5m)
The variance is favourable by $5.5m due to:
· Lower contract expenses of $1.9m for maintenance of park land & irrigation, park building & furniture, road reserves, beach land & bushland and provision for emergency services;
· Lower consulting fees of $1.1m mainly due to delays in undertaking of special projects for Planning Services, Place Management, Environmental Management and provision of Information Technology Services;
· Lower material expense of $836k to maintain road reserves, pathways, operations centre and park irrigation equipment;
· Lower contributions & donations expense of $483k of which $130k relates to Pitstop park within land development management services and $353k relates to reduced donation funding requests from community organisations;
· Lower refuse removal expense of $240k due to reduction in recycling waste gate fee;
· Lower legal fees of $141k;
· Lower software maintenance support and licence of $145k which is a timing difference; and
· Lower advertising expenses of $197k due to reduced print demand and higher use of digital communications at a lower cost.
Note 6 Utilities
Month to Date - (Actual $589k, Revised Budget $793k)
The variance is favourable by $204k due to lower electricity usage, of which $105k is related to Street Lighting and maintenance of Community Centre Buildings & Sporting Club Buildings.
Note 7 Insurance
Month to Date - (Actual $50k, Revised Budget $72k)
The variance is favourable by $22k, which is within the reportable threshold.
Year to Date - (Actual $502k, Revised Budget $734k)
The favourable year to date variance of $232k is a result of the City’s receipt of a credit from its insurer “Local Government Insurance Service (Australia)” with the City opting to offset the insurance premium.
Non Operating Revenue & Expenses
Note 8 Non Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
Month to Date – (Actual $3.4m, Revised Budget $78k)
The variance is favourable by $3.3m, which is mainly attributable to:
Cash Contribution of $1.3m:
· Late receipt of $1.3m relates to Halesworth park sport facilities project, which was anticipated in September 2020.
State Government grants of $1.8m:
Early receipt $1.8m from the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (DLGSCI) related to various projects as part of the State of Western Australia’s COVID-19 Recovery Plan (the WA Recovery Plan):
1. Warradale Community Centre
2. Kingsway Lighting Planning
3. Alkimos Aquatic and Recreation Centre
4. Youth Innovation Hub
Year to Date – (Actual $18.4m, Revised Budget $10.3m)
The variance is favourable by $8.1m, which is attributable to:
State Government grants of $3.3m:
· Early receipt of $1.8m of WA recovery funds as above mentioned;
· Late receipt of $727k relating to the Pinjar Road duplication project, which was anticipated in 2019/20;
· Early receipt of $500k of Coastal Protection Works Quinns Rocks Beach; and
· Early receipt of $340k for the implementation of the three bins system.
Federal Government grants of $2.7m:
· Early receipt $3.4m from Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Programme (LRCIP) related to various projects; partially offset by
· $750k relates to Halesworth park sport facilities not received yet.
Cash Contribution of $2.1m:
· Late receipt of $1.0m relates to Halesworth Park sport facilities project;
· Late receipt of $1.6m relates to Marmion Avenue dualling project, which was anticipated in 2019/20; partially offset by
· $469k of cash contribution has not yet been recognised as an income pending confirmation of obligations required to be carried out.
Note 9 Contributed Physical Assets
Month to Date – (Actual $1.7m, Revised Budget $0.0m)
In April 2021, $1.7m of various assets were handed over to the City by developers. The actual assets are recorded as and when assets are handed over to the City.
Year to Date – (Actual $10.4m, Revised Budget $6.8m)
The variance is favourable by $3.6m. The actual assets hand overs by developers are higher than anticipated.
Note 10 Profit / Loss on Asset Disposals
Month to Date – (Combined Actual $575k, Combined Revised Budget $0k)
The favourable variance of $575k is a result of a higher proceeds relating to land sales from Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) than anticipated.
Year to Date – (Combined Actual $2.5m, Combined Revised Budget $-12.3m)
The variance is favourable by $14.8m mainly due to delays in take over of ownership of Ocean Reef Road and Gnangara Road by Main Roads WA. The City is awaiting the appropriate transfer documentation from Main Roads WA to process the ownership transfer.
Note 11 TPS & DCP Income
Month to Date – (Actual $664k, Revised Budget $1.2m)
The unfavourable variance of $538k is mainly due to delay receipt of headworks levy of Cells 8 and 9, which is a timing difference.
Year to Date – (Actual $8.8m, Revised Budget $8.4m)
The variance is favourable by $385k due to early receipt of headworks levy relates to Cell 5 in the previous month, which is not budgeted for 2020/21.
Statement of Financial Position (Attachment 2)
Note 1 - Net Current Assets
When compared to the opening position at 30 June 2020 Net Current Assets have increased by $59.6m, which is predominately due to levying of 2020/21 Rates and Waste Service Fees in July 2020.
Within the Current Assets, Current Receivables of $20.6m are mainly comprised of collectable Rates and Waste Service Fees debtors of $13.1m and Emergency Services Levy of $1.0m, with the remaining balance attributed to General Debtors of $6.5m.
Note 2 - Non-Current Assets
Non-Current Assets position as at 30 April 2021 have increased by $15.4m from 30 June 2020 Actuals. The movement is due to increase in Work in Progress and Asset Acquisition of $50.9m partially offset by accumulated depreciation of $35.5m.
Note 3 - Non-Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities position as at 30 April 2021 have increased by $55k due to movement in provisions.
The existing loan with the Western Australia Treasury Corporation remains unchanged making up 37% of total Non-Current Liabilities.
Financial Performance Indicators
The table below presents data on non-asset related financial ratios, comparing the minimum standard expected as per the DLGSCI status at the year to date figures, and at the same period of the last year.
A green highlight is used where the minimum standard is met or exceeded. Highlighted in red is below the standard (where relevant).
The asset ratios will be published as part of the Statutory Financial Statements.
Capital Works Program
The status of the Capital Works Program is summarised by Sub-Program in the table below:
During April 2021, $4.4m was spent. Details of significant expenditure for the month are included in Attachment 3. As at 30 April 2021, the City has spent $39.9m, which represents 58.4% of $68.4m 2020/21 Capital Works Revised Budget.
The City’s forecast spend of $54.1m represents 79.0% of the 2020/21 revised budget. The estimated carry forward amount will be finalised by the end of May 2021, and will be presented to Council as part of the 2021/22 Budget adoption.
To further expand on the Capital Works Program information above, selected key capital projects updates are provided in the Top Capital Projects attachment to this report (Attachment 4).
Capital Changes
It is proposed that the following changes be made to the 2020/21 Capital Works Program.
PR-2749 Recurring Program, new major pathways – An additional $30,000 is required to allow for an unscheduled service adjustment cost on Wanneroo Road. It is proposed to fund this adjustment from savings identified in PR-2672 Recurring Program, Upgrade Beach Accessways.
PR-4074 Renew Facilities Management System – Additional funds of $23,000 are required to complete the implementation of the new system, with savings identified in PR-1031 New IT Equipment and Software to cover the expenditure.
PR-4255 Joondalup Drive, Banksia Grove, renew road surface – An additional $57,000 is required for the payment of a late invoice that was received after completion of construction works. It is proposed to fund the Municipal portion of this adjustment ($19,000) from savings identified in PR-2672 Recurring Program, Upgrade Beach Accessways. The remainder ($38,000) is via grant funding from Main Roads.
PR-4259 Marmion Avenue / Santa Barbara Parade intersection, Quinns Rocks, upgrade traffic treatments – It is proposed to transfer the costs and matching budget ($16,000) for the design and survey for this project from PR-4225 Recurring Program, Upgrade Road Infrastructure and Streetscapes – Design Only to accurately reflect all associated costs under the same project number.
PR-4264 New automatic closing gates and CCTV at various car parks – The Local Government Grant Scheme (LGGS) 2020/21 approved Emergency Service Levy (ESL) funding to retro-fit automatic gates at Quinns Rocks and Two Rocks Fire Stations. The $31,051 grant has already been received by the City.
PR-4273 Santa Barbara Parade / Marmion Avenue, Quinns Rocks, upgrade intersection – It is proposed to transfer the costs and matching budget ($15,000) for the design and survey for this project from PR-4225 Recurring Program, Upgrade Road Infrastructure and Streetscapes – Design Only to accurately reflect all associated costs under the same project number.
PR-4276 Lenore Road, Hocking, upgrade road from Kemp St to Elliot Rd – It has been determined that 50% of the funding for this project will be sourced from TPS Cell 4. This will result in a Municipal Fund saving of $72,500.
PR-4287 Frederick Stubbs Park, Quinns Rocks, upgrade car park and surrounds – It is proposed to transfer the costs and matching budget for community consultation and design works for this project from PR-1087 Recurring Program, Renew Transport Infrastructure Assets ($35,119) and PR-1904 Recurring Program, Renew Community Building Assets ($15,000) to accurately reflect all associated costs under the same project number.
PR-4331 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex, Madeley, Upgrade Soccer Field Floodlighting – It is required to bring the start of the design for this project forward from 2021/22, in order to comply with the grant conditions. It is proposed to fund the $3,500 partly from grant funds already received ($1,500), and partly through savings identified in PR-4125 Time Locks In Public Toilets, Various Locations, New Installations ($2,000).
Investment Portfolio (Attachment 5)
In accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (and per the City’s Investment Policy), the City invests solely in Authorised Deposit taking Institutions (ADI’s):
At the end of April 2021, the City held an investment portfolio (cash & cash equivalents) of $429.4m (Face Value), equating to $430.7m inclusive of accrued interest. This total portfolio consists of restricted cash of $337.5m and un-restricted cash of $93.2m (excludes Cash at Bank, as it is non-interest bearing).
The City’s year to date investment portfolio return has exceeded the UBS Australia Bank Bill rate index benchmark by 0.59% p.a. (0.66% p.a. vs. 0.07% p.a.); however, it is noted that Interest Earnings were budgeted at a 1.00% yield. The prevailing historically low Reserve Bank of Australia Cash Rate at 0.1% is affecting the City’s ability to attract higher interest rates from ADI’s.
Rate Setting Statement (Financial Activity Statement) (Attachment 6)
The Rate Setting Statement (Financial Activity Statement) represents a composite view of the finances of the City, identifying the movement in Surplus/(Deficit) based on the Revenues (excluding Rates), Expenses, Capital Works and Funding Movements, resulting in the Rating Income required. It is noted that the closing Surplus/(Deficit) will balance to reconciliation of Net Current Assets Surplus/(Deficit) position as detailed on the following page. Whilst a year-to-date surplus of $69.3m is reported, this amount will progressively reduce towards the balanced position by year-end as operational and capital expenditures are incurred for the remainder of the financial year.
*The change in the AASB Standard 15 and 1058 have resulted in the City now recognising Grants and Contributions received as a liability when performance obligations have not yet been met.
**The change in the AASB Standard 15 has resulted in the City now recognising a contract asset when performance obligations have been met, however the Grants and Contributions not received.
Consultation
This document has been prepared in consultation with Administration for review and analysis.
Comment
In reference to Statement of Comprehensive Income in the report, the following colours have been used to categorise three levels of variance:
Revenues:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red > -10%.
Expenses:
· Green > 0%;
· Amber -0% to -10%; and
· Red > -10%.
Statutory Compliance
This monthly Financial Activity Statement report comply with Regulations 34 (1) and 34 (4) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.2 Provide responsible resource and planning management which recognises our significant future growth”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-017 Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
In pursuing growth under the Economic objectives of the existing Strategic Community Plan, Council should consider the following risk appetite statements:
“Local Jobs
The City is prepared to accept a high level of financial risk provided that the City implements a risk management strategy to manage any risk exposure.
Strategic Growth
The City will accept a moderate level of financial risk for facilitating industry development and growth.
Any strategic objective including ongoing planning, funding and capital investment to develop infrastructure strategic assets carries financial risks.”
Policy Implications
· Accounting Policy;
· Investment Policy;
· Financial Cash Backed Reserves Policy; and
· Strategic Budget Policy.
Financial Implications
As outlined in the report and detailed in Attachments 1 to 6.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:
1. RECEIVES the Financial Activity Statement and commentaries on variances year to date Budget for the period ended 30 April 2021 consisting of:
a) April 2021 year to date Financial Activity Statement;
b) April 2021 year to date Net Current Assets Position; and
c) April 2021 year to date Material Financial Variance Notes.
2. APPROVES BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the changes to the 2020/21 Capital Works Program as shown in the table below:
|
Number |
From |
To |
Amount |
Description |
|
PR-2749 |
PR-2672 Recurring Program, Upgrade Beach Access ways
|
PR-2749 Recurring Program, new major pathways |
$30,000 |
Additional funds for unscheduled service adjustment cost. |
|
PR-4074 |
PR-1031 New IT Equipment and Software |
PR-4074 Renew Facilities Management System |
$23,000 |
Additional funds to finalise implementation of system. |
|
PR-4255 |
State Government (MRWA) Grant |
PR-4255 Joondalup Drive, Banksia Grove, renew road surface |
$38,000 |
Additional funds for a late invoice received after completion of construction. |
|
PR-4255 |
PR-2672 Recurring Program, Upgrade Beach Accessways
|
PR-4255 Joondalup Drive, Banksia Grove, renew road surface |
$19,000 |
Additional funds for a late invoice received after completion of construction. |
|
PR-4259 |
PR-4225 Recurring Program, Upgrade Road Infrastructure and Streetscapes – Design Only |
PR-4259 Marmion Ave / Santa Barbara Pde intersection, Quinns Rocks, upgrade traffic treatments |
$16,000 |
Transfer of budget and expenditure to accurately reflect total project costs. |
|
PR-4264 |
State Government Grant |
PR-4264 New automatic closing gates and CCTV at various car parks |
$31,051 |
ESL grant funds required to retro-fit automatic gates at Quinns Rocks and Two Rocks Fire Stations. Grant funding has been received. |
|
PR-4273 |
PR-4225 Recurring Program, Upgrade Road Infrastructure and Streetscapes – Design Only
|
PR-4273 Santa Barbara Parade / Marmion Avenue, Quinns Rocks, upgrade intersection |
$15,000 |
Transfer of budget and expenditure to accurately reflect total project costs. |
|
Number |
From |
To |
Amount |
Description |
|
PR-4276 |
TPS Cell 4 |
PR-4276 Lenore Road, Hocking, upgrade road from Kemp St to Elliot Rd |
$72,500 |
TPS Cell 4 to contribute 50% of funds to project. |
|
PR-4287 |
PR-1904 Recurring Program, Renew Community Building Assets |
PR-4287 Frederick Stubbs Park, Quinns Rocks, upgrade car park and surrounds |
$15,000 |
Transfer of budget and expenditure to accurately reflect total project costs. |
|
PR-4331 |
State Government Grant – WA Recovery Plan |
PR-4331 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex, Madeley, Upgrade Soccer Field Floodlighting |
$1,500 |
Start of design works brought forward to comply with grant conditions. |
|
PR-4331 |
PR-4125 Time Locks In Public Toilets, Various Locations, New Installations |
PR-4331 Kingsway Regional Sporting Complex, Madeley, Upgrade Soccer Field Floodlighting |
$2,000 |
Start of design works brought forward to comply with grant conditions. |
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Statement of Comprehensive Income April 2021 |
21/193732 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Statement of Financial Position April 2021 |
21/193739 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Significant Capital Expenditure April 2021 |
21/193743 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Top Projects 2020-21 - April 2021 - 20210210 |
16/151914[v61] |
|
|
5⇩. |
Attachment 5 – Investment Report April 2021 |
21/193747 |
|
|
6⇩. |
Attachment 6 – Rate Setting Statement April 2021 |
21/193751 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 237
Strategic & Business Planning
File Ref: 37461V02 – 21/230565
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
For Council Members to approve and formally adopt the new Strategic Community Plan 2021-31 (SCP) to guide the City’s strategic direction for the next ten years.
Background
A major review of the City’s SCP has taken place during 2020/21 as per the legislative requirements of the Local Government Act 1995, s 5.56 and Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996; (Regulation 19C, 19D).
The review commenced with the Council Member Strategic Workshop in August 2020 which considered strategic priorities and risks.
Extensive stakeholder engagement took place between October 2020 and February 2021, led by the City’s consultants. This focused on future Vision, community aspirations, priorities and challenges. The results of the engagement highlighted the community’s strong priority of continuing to feel safe in public places, and delivering sustainable and environmental outcomes. The major challenge identified through engagement was that of managing City growth and development.
The final stakeholder engagement report was presented to Council Members in February 2021.
Following additional feedback from Council Members, the initial draft options for Vision and Purpose statements were presented for consideration to the Council Forum on 27 April 2021.
Final drafts options for the Vision, Purpose, Goals and Priorities were presented to the Council Forum on 3 May 2021.
The final draft SCP Vision, Purpose, Goals and Priorities were presented at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 11 May 2021, and were endorsed for a 20-day period of public comment.
Updates to the SCP Vision, Purpose, Goals and Priorities from the public comment period were presented at Council Forum on 1 June 2021.
The Strategic Community Plan forms part of the City’s Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework (see Figure 1) and is required by legislation to have a major review every four years.
The Department Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (DLGSC) provide guidelines around the expected minimum standards when developing a Strategic Community Plan to which the City has been working to during the process.
The City last conducted a major review of the Strategic Community Plan in 2016.
Figure 1 – The City of Wanneroo Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework
Detail
After an extensive review of the Strategic Community Plan 2016/17 - 2026/27, a new strategic direction has been developed for the City, based on extensive consultation and feedback from key stakeholders of the City of Wanneroo.
Strategic Community Plan 2021-31 Overview
The SCP 2021-31 has a revised Vision statement and a new Purpose statement that were developed after input from various stakeholders across the City. The revised Vision and new Purpose are:
|
Vision Statement
|
“A welcoming community, connected through local opportunities”
|
|
Purpose Statement |
“To create a strong community with local opportunities to participate, be active, feel secure, contribute and belong”
|
In addition to the Vision and Purpose statements, seven new Strategic Goals and 32 Strategic Priorities have been developed. The new Goals and Priorities were formulated after lengthy consideration of:
· The stakeholder engagement results for the SCP Review (Community vision, aspirations, priorities and challenges)
· Strategic opportunities and threats (including risks, PESTEL analysis and global megatrends)
· The current Local Government industry (legislation, policy)
· Current organisation direction (adopted strategies and plans); and
· Resourcing capabilities (financial, workforce, assets).
The seven Strategic Goals and 32 Strategic Priorities are as follows:
|
Goal 1 |
An inclusive and accessible City with places and spaces that embrace all
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 1.1 - Value the contribution of all people Priority 1.2 - Valued public places and spaces Priority 1.3 - Facilities and activities for all Priority 1.4 - Bringing people together Priority 1.5 - Learning and discovery choices
|
|
Goal 2 |
A City that celebrates rich cultural histories, where people can visit and enjoy unique experiences
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 2.1 - Valuing cultures and history Priority 2.2 - Arts and local creativity Priority 2.3 - Tourism opportunities and visitor experiences
|
|
Goal 3 |
A vibrant, innovative City with local opportunities for work, business and investment
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 3.1 - Strong and diverse local economy Priority 3.2 - Attract and support new and existing business Priority 3.3 - Plan, develop and activate employment locations Priority 3.4 - Develop local jobs and skills Priority 3.5 - Opportunities for investment
|
|
Goal 4 |
A sustainable City that balances the relationship between urban growth and the environment
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 4.1 - Plan for climate change Priority 4.2 - Manage and protect local Biodiversity Priority 4.3 - Manage natural assets and resources Priority 4.4 - Manage waste and its impacts
|
|
Goal 5 |
A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 5.1 - Develop to meet current need and future growth Priority 5.2 - Plan for and manage land use Priority 5.3 - Responsibly managed and maintained assets Priority 5.4 - People can move around easily Priority 5.5 - People feel safe in public places Priority 5.6 - Prepared and resilient
|
|
Goal 6 |
A future focused City that advocates, engages and partners to progress the priorities of the community
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 6.1 - Advocate in line with community priorities Priority 6.2 - Actively seek to engage Priority 6.3 - Build local partnerships and work together with others Priority 6.4 - Understand our stakeholders and their needs
|
|
Goal 7 |
A well governed and managed City that makes informed decisions, provides strong community leadership and valued customer focused services
|
|
Priorities |
Priority 7.1 - Clear direction and decision making Priority 7.2 - Responsibly and ethically managed Priority 7.3 - Anticipate and adapt quickly to change Priority 7.4 - Promote offerings, opportunities and initiatives Priority 7.5 - Customer focused information and services
|
Further detailed narrative on each of the Goals and Priorities can be found in Attachment 1.
A final complete version of the new Strategic Community Plan 2021-31, incorporating the Mayor’s introduction, key City statistics, an overview of the stakeholder engagement process and measurement of the plan, will be included for the Council Meeting on 15 June 2021.
Consultation
The City has undertaken significant stakeholder engagement for the review of the SCP. This included face-to-face and digital sessions as well as online surveys with Council Members, the general Community, targeted Community cohorts, businesses and employees.
The stakeholder engagement portion of the project was undertaken in conjunction with consultants and was finalised in February 2021.
Feedback from Council Members on Vision and Purpose statements was sought in a survey on 30 March 2021.
A 20-day period of public comment on the draft SCP 2021-31 Vision, Purpose, Goals and Priorities was undertaken between 14 May and 2 June 2021.
Comment
The City needs to approve a new strategic direction by 30 June 2021 to meet legislative requirements.
There have been significant challenges during the project due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on stakeholder engagement over an extended period of time and the new SCP will reflect the pandemic period.
Statutory Compliance
The City of Wanneroo must adhere to the legislative requirements of the Local Government Act 1995, s5.56 and Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996; Regulation 19C, 19D) with regards to the review and adoption of the Strategic Community Plan.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S20 – Strategic Community Plan |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
The SCP review project has an approved budget allocation for stakeholder engagement as per the adopted 2020/21 Annual Budget.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ADOPTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the new Strategic Community Plan 2021-31 to guide the City’s strategic direction for the next ten years;
2. As per Regulation 19D of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996, request that the City’s Chief Executive Officer:
a) gives local public notice that the plan has been adopted; and
b) publish the plan on the City’s official website.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - SCP 2021-31 - Council Briefing - 08062021 |
21/233352 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 299
Transactional Finance
File Ref: 1859V02 – 21/208970
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
Presentation to the Council of a list of accounts paid for the month of April 2021, including a statement as to the total amounts outstanding at the end of the month.
Background
Local Governments are required each month to prepare a list of accounts paid for that month and submit the list to the next Ordinary Meeting of the Council.
In addition, it must record all other outstanding accounts and include that amount with the list to be presented. The list of accounts paid and the total of outstanding accounts must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Detail
The following is the Summary of Accounts paid in April 2021:
|
Funds |
Vouchers |
Amount |
|
Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Accounts Paid – April 2021 Cheque Numbers EFT Document Numbers TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID
Manual Journals Less Cancelled Cheques Town Planning Scheme RECOUP FROM MUNICIPAL FUND |
121290 - 121460 4096 - 4118 |
$378,434.57 $12,361,798.59 $12,740,233.16
$1,925.00 ($359,711.65) ($30,354.73) $12,352,091.78 |
|
Municipal Fund – Bank A/C Accounts Paid – April 2021 Recoup to Director Corporate Services Advance A/C Direct Payments Payroll – Direct Debits TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$12,352,091.78 $45,516.17 $4,234,947.53 $16,632,555.48 |
|
Town Planning Scheme Accounts Paid – April 2021 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 8 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAID |
|
$23,354.73 $2,275.00 $4,725.00 $30,354.73 |
|
WARRANT OF PAYMENTS APRIL 2021 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENT |
DATE |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT |
|
00121290 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$326.32 |
|
00121291 |
07/04/2021 |
Jillian Collins |
$885.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Fees - Reissue Stale Cheque |
|
|
00121292 |
07/04/2021 |
Mark Longman |
$172.50 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121293 |
07/04/2021 |
Quinns Rocks Senior Cricket Club |
$11.70 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121294 |
07/04/2021 |
Tamika Devine |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Cat Registered For Lifetime - Payment Not Required |
|
|
00121295 |
07/04/2021 |
Conrad & Anne Weaver |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Balance Of Account |
|
|
00121296 |
07/04/2021 |
Patricia Goodrum |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Balance Of Account |
|
|
00121297 |
07/04/2021 |
Jean Prout |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gold Program - Balance Of Account |
|
|
00121298 |
07/04/2021 |
Pride Homes & Developments Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121299 |
07/04/2021 |
Yuan Jin |
$21.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Unavailable |
|
|
00121300 |
07/04/2021 |
Mandurah Structure Shadesails & Marine Services |
$61.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Services Levy - Refused |
|
|
00121301 |
07/04/2021 |
Lisa Evans |
$105.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Approval Certificate Fee - Not Approved Within Legislated Timeframe |
|
|
00121302 |
06/04/2021 |
1800 Move It |
$670.50 |
|
|
|
Moving Of The Furniture In Chambers And Returned - Corporate Support |
|
|
00121303 |
06/04/2021 |
Australian Institute Of Management |
$1,570.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Strategic Leadership - 1 Attendee - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
00121304 |
06/04/2021 |
Bishops Boilys |
$517.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Gates - Yanchep Beach Kiosk - Building Maintenance |
|
|
00121305 |
06/04/2021 |
Cleanaway |
$1,070.30 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
00121306 |
06/04/2021 |
Dench Entertainment |
$500.00 |
|
|
|
DJ Services - Events |
|
|
00121307 |
06/04/2021 |
Department of the Premier and Cabinet |
$197.76 |
|
|
|
Basis Of Rates - Rating Services |
|
|
00121308 |
07/04/2021 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00121309 |
07/04/2021 |
Alkimos Rugby League |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121310 |
07/04/2021 |
Banksia Grove Development Nominees |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121311 |
07/04/2021 |
Kelly Bloxham |
$225.10 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121312 |
07/04/2021 |
Henry Johaness Boogaard |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121313 |
07/04/2021 |
Mrs Kylie Buckle |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121314 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$632.45 |
|
00121315 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$1,067.02 |
|
00121316 |
07/04/2021 |
Mulugeta Debebe |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121317 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00121318 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$23,671.39 |
|
00121319 |
07/04/2021 |
Mrs Agata Ettwell |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121320 |
07/04/2021 |
Tyler Gooding |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121321 |
07/04/2021 |
Mr Vaishali Halai |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121322 |
07/04/2021 |
Mrs Tennielle Hansord |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121323 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
|
|
00121324 |
07/04/2021 |
Liberian Soccer Veterans |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121325 |
07/04/2021 |
Pragna Mandalia |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121326 |
07/04/2021 |
Mindarie Netball Club |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121327 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$710.28 |
|
00121328 |
07/04/2021 |
Venkata Palanati |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121329 |
07/04/2021 |
Quinns Rocks Fishing Club |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121330 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00121331 |
07/04/2021 |
Lohana Samaj |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121332 |
07/04/2021 |
Juiliana Scaravilli |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121333 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$640.25 |
|
00121334 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$179.09 |
|
00121335 |
07/04/2021 |
Mrs Jacinta Stacey |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121336 |
07/04/2021 |
Mrs Lauren Trevis |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121337 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$643.87 |
|
00121338 |
07/04/2021 |
Mr Cosimo Vozza |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121339 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
00121340 |
07/04/2021 |
West Coast Cricket Club |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121341 |
07/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00121342 |
06/04/2021 |
Ashby Operations Centre Petty Cash |
$275.25 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00121343 |
06/04/2021 |
Telstra |
$2,880.60 |
|
|
|
Phone / Internet Charges For The City |
|
|
00121344 |
06/04/2021 |
Wanneroo Library Petty Cash |
$289.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00121345 |
06/04/2021 |
Yanchep Red Hawks Football Club |
$250.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121346 |
09/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$494.00 |
|
00121347 |
12/04/2021 |
Cr F Cvitan |
$4,596.15 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
00121348 |
12/04/2021 |
Cr X Nguyen |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
00121349 |
13/04/2021 |
Pham Anh |
$32.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00121350 |
13/04/2021 |
Jeremy Gardner |
$228.30 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Rejected |
|
|
00121351 |
13/04/2021 |
Babylon Homes Construction Pty Ltd |
$842.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Services Levy - Application Refused |
|
|
00121352 |
13/04/2021 |
Sovereign Building Company |
$7,593.05 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application |
|
|
00121353 |
13/04/2021 |
Josephine Harman |
$228.30 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Approval Certificate - Not Required |
|
|
00121354 |
13/04/2021 |
Planning Solutions |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Duplicate |
|
|
00121355 |
13/04/2021 |
Cool Thatch |
$166.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Duplicate |
|
|
00121356 |
13/04/2021 |
Johannes Van Vliet |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121357 |
13/04/2021 |
Nicole Goncalves |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121358 |
13/04/2021 |
Estelle Madaffari |
$63.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Cancelled |
|
|
00121359 |
13/04/2021 |
Trophy Shop Australia |
$13.70 |
|
|
|
Name Badge - Assets |
|
|
00121360 |
13/04/2021 |
Winning Edge HR Consulting |
$4,675.00 |
|
|
|
Team Planning Day - Communications And Brand |
|
|
00121361 |
13/04/2021 |
Chin Community of Western Australia |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121362 |
13/04/2021 |
Erin De Jussing |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121363 |
13/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$1,067.40 |
|
00121364 |
13/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$2,244.54 |
|
00121365 |
13/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$22,569.59 |
|
00121366 |
13/04/2021 |
Ms Toni O'Loughlin |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121367 |
13/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$1,016.92 |
|
00121368 |
13/04/2021 |
Ms Chantelle Rogers |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121369 |
13/04/2021 |
Mrs Julie Tucker |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121370 |
13/04/2021 |
Aiza White |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121371 |
13/04/2021 |
Kelly Wright |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121372 |
13/04/2021 |
Krystyna Bell |
$53.60 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121373 |
13/04/2021 |
Pirone Builders |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
00121374 |
20/04/2021 |
City of Whittlesea |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
|
2021 / 2022 Federal Election Campaign Strategy NGAA - Economic Development |
|
|
00121375 |
20/04/2021 |
Cleanaway |
$535.15 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal - Summer Sideshow Scenic Park - Place Management |
|
|
00121376 |
20/04/2021 |
Driveshaft Balancing Services |
$3,640.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts / Repairs - Fleet |
|
|
00121377 |
20/04/2021 |
Fleetspec Hire |
$3,132.75 |
|
|
|
Hire Of Truck 24.2.2021 - Community Event 3 Bin Roll Out - Waste Education |
|
|
00121378 |
20/04/2021 |
Gymcare |
$580.32 |
|
|
|
Equipment Repair - Aquamotion |
|
|
00121379 |
20/04/2021 |
Investwest Pty Ltd |
$1,760.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Economic Development |
|
|
00121380 |
20/04/2021 |
Minter Ellison |
$1,524.60 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
00121381 |
20/04/2021 |
One Org Pty Ltd |
$220.00 |
|
|
|
One Straw Services - All Washed Up Community Event 10.04.2021 - Library Services |
|
|
00121382 |
20/04/2021 |
Rowe Scientific Pty Ltd |
$52.54 |
|
|
|
Alcohol Swabs - Health Services |
|
|
00121383 |
20/04/2021 |
Oanh Abdullah |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121384 |
20/04/2021 |
Alkimos Rugby League Club |
$656.76 |
|
|
|
Refund - Hire Fees - Double Payment |
|
|
00121385 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$2,461.42 |
|
00121386 |
20/04/2021 |
Mrs Rosielyn Conquilla |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121387 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$668.25 |
|
00121388 |
20/04/2021 |
Mulugeta Debebe |
$152.90 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121389 |
20/04/2021 |
Benazir Hashimi |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121390 |
20/04/2021 |
Nikhil Hirani |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121391 |
20/04/2021 |
Mr Satish Kumar |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121392 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
00121393 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$749.99 |
|
00121394 |
20/04/2021 |
Tendai Amy Ncube |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121395 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$4,009.44 |
|
00121396 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$29,560.90 |
|
00121397 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$494.00 |
|
00121398 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$574.71 |
|
00121399 |
20/04/2021 |
Mr Mayur Patel |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121400 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$34,987.08 |
|
00121401 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$935.08 |
|
00121402 |
20/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$107.41 |
|
00121403 |
20/04/2021 |
Mrs Ann Wigley |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121404 |
20/04/2021 |
Stephen Lindau |
$48.77 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gym Membership - Cancelled |
|
|
00121405 |
20/04/2021 |
Jacob Thomas |
$2,266.65 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Not Within The City |
|
|
00121406 |
20/04/2021 |
Nicholas Michael Sloan |
$25.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Septic Tank Plan - Not Available |
|
|
00121407 |
20/04/2021 |
NEWest Alliance |
$184.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121408 |
20/04/2021 |
Brendon Spivey |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121409 |
20/04/2021 |
Blanca Henriquez |
$540.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121410 |
20/04/2021 |
Sophie Hamlin |
$53.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gym Membership - Aquamotion |
|
|
00121411 |
20/04/2021 |
Sandra Hamlin |
$53.50 |
|
|
|
Refund - Gym Membership - Aquamotion |
|
|
00121412 |
20/04/2021 |
Nadine Page |
$92.00 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121413 |
20/04/2021 |
AD & NL Gatter |
$27.80 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121414 |
20/04/2021 |
Beverley Manning |
$85.80 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121415 |
20/04/2021 |
Lee Dillon |
$21.20 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Paid Twice |
|
|
00121416 |
20/04/2021 |
City of Wanneroo |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Morning Tea - Employee Retirement |
|
|
|
|
Cash Advance - Coles / Myer Gift Cards - Digital Literacy For Seniors Survey Prizes |
|
|
00121417 |
20/04/2021 |
Girrawheen Library Petty Cash |
$98.40 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00121418 |
20/04/2021 |
Cr X Nguyen |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Candidate Nomination Fee - Candidate Elected To Council / Received More Than 5% Of The Vote - Re-Issue Of Cheque 00118243 |
|
|
00121419 |
20/04/2021 |
Perth Patio Magic Pty Ltd |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121420 |
20/04/2021 |
Telstra |
$20,573.28 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
Navman Charges - Fleet |
|
|
00121421 |
20/04/2021 |
West Perth Football Club Incorporated |
$11,000.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - Communications & Brand |
|
|
00121422 |
23/04/2021 |
Department of Transport |
$97,224.15 |
|
|
|
Bulk Licence Payments - Fleet Assets |
|
|
00121423 |
27/04/2021 |
Elaine Awad |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
Subih Bros Performance - Kingsbridge Park 16.01.2021 - Events |
|
|
00121424 |
27/04/2021 |
Logo Appointments |
$6,778.35 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
00121425 |
27/04/2021 |
Louisa Jane Holdings Pty Ltd |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
ATM Trailer - Dogs Breakfast - Events |
|
|
00121426 |
27/04/2021 |
Patti the Pig |
$1,600.00 |
|
|
|
4 Sustainability Series Workshops - It's Not All Rubbish Kids - Library Services |
|
|
00121427 |
27/04/2021 |
Royal Pride Pty Ltd |
$723.25 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Transport And Traffic |
|
|
00121428 |
27/04/2021 |
Trophy Shop Australia |
$95.90 |
|
|
|
Name Badges - Various Employees |
|
|
00121429 |
27/04/2021 |
Ellenbrook Football Club |
$137.50 |
|
|
|
Kidsport Voucher - 1 Child |
|
|
00121430 |
27/04/2021 |
Facility Officer WLCC Petty Cash |
$127.80 |
|
|
|
Petty Cash |
|
|
00121431 |
27/04/2021 |
Telstra |
$3,757.59 |
|
|
|
Fire Protection Wireless Data |
|
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
00121432 |
27/04/2021 |
The Roof & Wall Doctor |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
00121433 |
27/04/2021 |
Heidi Blake |
$20.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - School Holiday Program - Kingsway |
|
|
00121434 |
27/04/2021 |
P & N Woodcock Pty Ltd |
$60.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - CTF Levy - Not Required |
|
|
00121435 |
27/04/2021 |
PSW Energy |
$192.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Applications - Duplicate |
|
|
00121436 |
27/04/2021 |
Spectra WA Properties Pty Ltd |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Application Exempt |
|
|
00121437 |
27/04/2021 |
Epho Pty Ltd |
$276.09 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Not Required |
|
|
00121438 |
27/04/2021 |
Warren Erasmus |
$10.80 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00121439 |
27/04/2021 |
Clayton Pinney |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Copies Of Plans - Not Available |
|
|
00121440 |
27/04/2021 |
Helen Sands |
$40.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Holiday Programs - Cancelled |
|
|
00121441 |
27/04/2021 |
Sunaina Dhanjal |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121442 |
27/04/2021 |
Catherine Cullinane |
$30.55 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business Notification Fee - Not Required |
|
|
00121443 |
27/04/2021 |
Oanh Abdullah |
$70.20 |
|
|
|
Hire Fee Refund |
|
|
00121444 |
27/04/2021 |
Josiah Drynan - Robertson |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121445 |
27/04/2021 |
Ella Fitzsimmons |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121446 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$2,658.80 |
|
00121447 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$375.00 |
|
00121448 |
27/04/2021 |
Ms Amanda Hosking |
$350.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121449 |
27/04/2021 |
MD Hossain |
$84.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121450 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$863.23 |
|
00121451 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$632.45 |
|
00121452 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$720.28 |
|
00121453 |
27/04/2021 |
Brogan Novel |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121454 |
27/04/2021 |
Geraldine Potts |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121455 |
27/04/2021 |
Dhara Sanghavi |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121456 |
27/04/2021 |
Rates Refund |
$9,557.74 |
|
00121457 |
27/04/2021 |
Mrs Kahlia Wanless |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121458 |
27/04/2021 |
Jade Weston |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
00121459 |
28/04/2021 |
Cancelled |
|
|
00121460 |
28/04/2021 |
City of Wanneroo |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Cash Advance - 3 Gift Cards - Prizes For Community Development Plan Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - Cheques |
$378,434.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER |
|||
|
00004096 |
06/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$12,880.80 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$95.00 |
|
|
|
Arrangement - N & S Fletcher - 50th Wedding Anniversary - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Amber Appelbee |
$668.00 |
|
|
|
Entertainers - Summer Sideshow Paloma Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Animal Pest Management Services |
$3,729.00 |
|
|
|
Rabbit/Fox Control - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$206.36 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
AUSQ Training |
$840.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Basic Worksite Traffic Management - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Aussie Natural Spring Water |
$73.50 |
|
|
|
Water Bottle Swap Overs - Yanchep Hub - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Ltd |
$11,477.43 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management Resource Development Centre Incorporated |
$1,420.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Virtual Applied Project Management - 06 - 08.04.2021 - 1 Attendee - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Australian Training Management Pty Ltd |
$450.00 |
|
|
|
Training - First Aid 24.03.2021 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Autosmart North Metro Perth |
$784.30 |
|
|
|
Floor Smart Cleaner - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$1,508.22 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
BBC Entertainment |
$2,750.00 |
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Breakfast - May 2021 Keynote Speaker - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Binley Fencing |
$639.54 |
|
|
|
Fencing - Garden Park Drive Footpath - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group |
$2,309.12 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$18,580.25 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$6,177.75 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Burgtec |
$853.60 |
|
|
|
2 Air Task Chairs - Advocacy & Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
CA Technology Pty Ltd |
$8,800.00 |
|
|
|
Camms Professional Services - Go Live 10% - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$201.13 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$1,657.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$859.26 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Materials - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cathara Consulting Pty Ltd |
$17,160.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - FMIS Implementation - ICT |
|
|
|
|
CCS Strategic |
$4,396.70 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - AQM & KIS Restricted Tender - Property |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$8,121.30 |
|
|
|
6 USB-C Mobile Adapters & 1 Optiplex Computer - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$10,200.30 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$8,259.93 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cleartech Waste Management Pty Ltd |
$3,594.25 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste Oil - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Coastal Navigation Solutions |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Remove Stains - Ridgewood Park Artwork - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Construction Hydraulic Design Pty Ltd |
$3,960.00 |
|
|
|
Hydraulic Consultancy Services - Splendid Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Corner Desk Creative |
$1,089.00 |
|
|
|
Talking My Language Translation Assets - Waste Education |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$437.39 |
|
|
|
Stickers - Green Waste Bins |
|
|
|
|
Disability Signage - Edgar Griffiths Carpark - Construction |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Ltd |
$291.50 |
|
|
|
Install Breakglass - Kingsway - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Replace Detector - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$81,964.02 |
|
|
|
Court Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$88.20 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Delos Delta Pty Ltd |
$7,425.00 |
|
|
|
Delivery Of Final Engagement Report - Strategic & Business Planning |
|
|
|
|
Digital Mapping Solutions - Perth |
$33,026.44 |
|
|
|
Annual Support & Maintenance Fee - 01.02.2021 - 31.01.2022 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$286.00 |
|
|
|
Call Out - Yanchep Area - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$65,748.30 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$11,646.13 |
|
|
|
Sweeping / Drain Cleaning For The City |
|
|
|
|
Drone Shop Perth |
$450.00 |
|
|
|
Aviation Radio - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Emerge Associates |
$4,686.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - Splendid Park Cycling Facility - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$33,277.60 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Focus Consulting WA Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Consultancy - Ferrara Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$302.50 |
|
|
|
Fire Equipment - Emergency Services |
|
|
|
|
Fusion Applications Pty Ltd |
$3,960.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy - OICS Architecture Integration - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$198,515.71 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$451.00 |
|
|
|
Grass Tree Watering - Hardcastle Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$544.50 |
|
|
|
Install AFL Goals - Ridgewood Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hare & Forbes Pty Ltd |
$917.00 |
|
|
|
Shelving For Tool Shed - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Headset ERA |
$4,482.50 |
|
|
|
Wireless Headsets - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Heatley Sales Pty Ltd |
$1,370.07 |
|
|
|
Mechanics Gloves - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$5,736.50 |
|
|
|
Install Garden Edging - Rosslare Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Bench Seat - Memorial Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Replace Pavers - Nankeen Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$566.80 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Horizon West Landscape & Irrigation Ltd |
$3,520.00 |
|
|
|
Under Road Bore - Marmion Avenue - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$300.17 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Remove & Inspect Aerator - Brampton Lake - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$96,829.07 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$1,458.60 |
|
|
|
Decal Map - Community History Centre - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Virtual Reality Pull Up Banner - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$1,245.20 |
|
|
|
Portable Toilets - Paloma Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$10,726.48 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$817.32 |
|
|
|
PPE - Various Employees |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$903.04 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Komatsu Australia Pty Ltd |
$214.67 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$13,008.53 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$22.66 |
|
|
|
Laundry Services - Overalls - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$31,218.10 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Let's All Party |
$26,550.00 |
|
|
|
Amusement / Equipment Hire - Paloma Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Lobel Events |
$5,070.01 |
|
|
|
Lighting / Power - Koondoola Pictures In The Park - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Lighting And Power - Hocking Pictures In the Park - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals Australia WA |
$410.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop - Weaving Tapestries Developing Community - 22.03.2021 - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Manheim Pty Ltd |
$139.15 |
|
|
|
Towage Fees - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Matrix Traffic and Transport Data Pty Ltd |
$5,280.00 |
|
|
|
Contractor Traffic Counts - Road & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$3,001.93 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Midalia Steel Pty Ltd |
$1,908.75 |
|
|
|
Steel Products - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$2,988.26 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$132.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Bridge - Jack Barlow Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Mowmaster Turf Equipment |
$70.95 |
|
|
|
Mower Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
MPS Architects |
$2,131.25 |
|
|
|
Design Consultancy - Abbeville Park Oval Extension - Assets |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$296.08 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$30,027.11 |
|
|
|
Maintenance - Beach Access Ways - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Seed Collection - 15 Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Neverfail Springwater Limited |
$31.68 |
|
|
|
Supply Of Monthly Water - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$10,521.14 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Online Social Butterfly |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Open Windows Software Pty Ltd |
$885.50 |
|
|
|
SRM Training Portal - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$5,776.20 |
|
|
|
Tree Risk Assessment - Reinspection - Minda - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Tree Data Collection - Butler - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$1,160.50 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Pennant House Flags |
$3,096.50 |
|
|
|
Australian Flags - Events |
|
|
|
|
Peter's Bus Charters |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Bus Charter - Neerabup Industrial Park Tour - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$2,309.60 |
|
|
|
Alarm / CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Pritchard Francis Consulting Pty Ltd |
$7,584.72 |
|
|
|
Integrated Infrastructure Strategy - Yanchep Lagoon - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$815.14 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing WA Pty Ltd |
$6,953.10 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
REM Consulting |
$5,967.18 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$4,629.79 |
|
|
|
Lease /Image Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$838.20 |
|
|
|
Provision Of Linemarking Services - Gnangara Road Footpath - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$1,319.07 |
|
|
|
Granit Asphalt - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd |
$9,902.88 |
|
|
|
Lift And / Or Escalator Service - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$1,012.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Booklet - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Corporate Folders - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Bookmarks - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$154.00 |
|
|
|
Emergency Sand Clean - Houghton Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$4,018.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$1,046.64 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sprayline Spraying Equipment |
$126.50 |
|
|
|
Spare Parts - Backpack Sprayer - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$2,786.25 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$1,407.54 |
|
|
|
PPE - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Surepak (WA) Pty Ltd |
$4,408.25 |
|
|
|
Rubbish Bags - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Swan Towing Services Pty Ltd |
$440.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Rescue Plant - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$7,146.84 |
|
|
|
Location Of Services - Various Locations |
|
|
|
|
The Distributors Perth |
$323.35 |
|
|
|
Snacks And Confectionery - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
The Factory (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$676.50 |
|
|
|
Monthly Storage - Christmas Decorations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For Apex Gates Trust |
$34,157.19 |
|
|
|
Install Automatic Gates - Two Rocks & Clarkson Fire Station - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for CWC Trust |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Sports Floodlighting Design - Ridgewood Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee For The Simmonds Steel |
$3,190.00 |
|
|
|
10 Dog Bag Dispensers - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$487.37 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toro Australia Group Sales Pty Ltd |
$921.67 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$11,907.50 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$118,508.71 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Tutaki Unit Trust |
$464.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Pictures In The Park - Bembridge - Events |
|
|
|
|
Ungerboeck Systems International Pty Ltd |
$4,818.00 |
|
|
|
Consultant Engagement - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$103.88 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Operational Charges |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$4,721.77 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade |
$159.53 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Catering Leadership Course |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Stationery Supplies |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Towing Service |
$206.80 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$10,450.00 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$412.50 |
|
|
|
Servicing Of Grease Trap - Civic Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Probity Oversight Services - Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Winc Australia Pty Limited |
$383.70 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Work Clobber |
$219.60 |
|
|
|
Safety Boots - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$765.60 |
|
|
|
Plant Watering - Waiti Dreaming Reserve - Parks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004097 |
07/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Surfaces Pty Ltd |
$32,989.00 |
|
|
|
Cricket Pitch Covers - 3 Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Stiles Electrical |
$27,307.72 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Ridgewood Park Floodlighting - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004098 |
07/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$155.40 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$156.91 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$730.29 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$590.23 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$560.22 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Ms Colleen Enoch |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
Quinns Rocks Little Athletics Club |
$100.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
|
|
Westnam United Soccer Club Incorporated |
$850.00 |
|
|
|
Bond Refund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004100 |
06/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$251.15 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$151.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$593.70 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$18,724.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Celebration Homes Pty Ltd |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Return - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$967.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,240.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$676.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$163.83 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - 01.02.2021 - 28.02.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$920.00 |
|
|
|
False Fire Alarm Attendance - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Network |
$998.25 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$643.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Home Industry Builders Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Return - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,547.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$9,138.92 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Miss Rebecca Barton |
$21.25 |
|
|
|
Cat Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Laura Hay |
$330.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Cleaning Of Vehicle Due To Waste Truck Oil Spill - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,853.49 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
PS Structures Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$8,146.36 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$610,048.35 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$2,216.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Verge Licence Fee - Duplicate Application |
|
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$2,187.47 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$9,900.00 |
|
|
|
Design Fees - Hurlston Way - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Design Fees - Butterick Place - Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004101 |
12/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$2,384.98 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$221.76 |
|
|
|
Gas Cylinder Hire - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Animal Pest Management Services |
$6,435.00 |
|
|
|
Fox Control - Mather Drive & Neerabup - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Arcus Wire Group Pty Ltd |
$320.71 |
|
|
|
Hanging Rails & Adjustable Hooks - Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$71.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - ICT |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$171.42 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$456.96 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Bioscience Pty Ltd |
$798.60 |
|
|
|
Bioprime Trace - Parks |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$76,265.48 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City - March 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$1,415.73 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$230.17 |
|
|
|
Beverages - Kingsway Stadium |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Ltd |
$973.50 |
|
|
|
Fire Detection System Works - Various Locations - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$1,032.10 |
|
|
|
Court Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$213.40 |
|
|
|
Batteries - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$1,169.67 |
|
|
|
Install Kerbing - Seabreeze Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$4,537.50 |
|
|
|
Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd |
$924.00 |
|
|
|
Basic Fauna Survey - Mather Drive - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$89,319.58 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Flick Anticimex Pty Ltd |
$4,047.24 |
|
|
|
Sanitary Waste Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$1,774.67 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$12,219.90 |
|
|
|
Capping Repairs - Ocean Keys Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repair Gates - Carramar Golf Course - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$225.13 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$4,355.78 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$22,657.21 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Iron Tech Industries |
$2,420.00 |
|
|
|
Steel Fabrication Works - H Frames - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$1,794.93 |
|
|
|
Chlorine Gas Supply - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Disinfection Of Pools Chlorine Gas Supply - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$307.76 |
|
|
|
PPE - Waste / Parks |
|
|
|
|
JBS & G Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,131.35 |
|
|
|
Stage A - Contaminated Sites Audit - Property |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$115.68 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$2,127.45 |
|
|
|
Woody Weed Treatment - Yanchep / Two Rocks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Grass Treatment - Cinnabar Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$88,759.88 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Metrix Consulting Pty Ltd |
$11,495.00 |
|
|
|
Plan Survey - Initialisation - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$246,945.32 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Minuteman Press Joondalup |
$1,153.75 |
|
|
|
Printing - Swimming Pool Inspection Books - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$4,731.10 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment Repairs - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$20.79 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$2,154.00 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Penske Power Systems Pty Ltd |
$53.41 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Perth Heavy Towing |
$770.00 |
|
|
|
Towing Services - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$22,440.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Audit - 135 Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$1,001.00 |
|
|
|
Alarm Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Reliansys Pty Ltd |
$21,395.00 |
|
|
|
Annual Software Access Fee - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$422.38 |
|
|
|
Asphalt - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$396.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Brochures - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$13,880.52 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$2,156.00 |
|
|
|
Spatial Consulting Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
The Hire Guys Balcatta |
$363.00 |
|
|
|
Generators - Carnival At Paloma Park - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
The Poster Girls |
$418.00 |
|
|
|
Delivery Of Posters & Flyers - For Country For Nation - Cultural Development |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Hayto Trust |
$1,149.50 |
|
|
|
Photography - Outdoor Movie 13.03.2021 - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$40,224.42 |
|
|
|
Mulch - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$5,027.00 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$20,022.64 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd |
$63,622.18 |
|
|
|
Fuel Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$2,562.23 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Winc Australia Pty Limited |
$75.08 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$1,683.00 |
|
|
|
Seedling Watering - Ocean Reef Road - Parks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004102 |
12/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
WEX Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,749.50 |
|
|
|
Fuel - March 2021 - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004103 |
12/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Rates |
$1,249.00 |
|
|
|
Offset Of Rates In Lieu Of Monthly Allowances |
|
|
|
|
Cr Brett Treby |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Christopher Baker |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Domenic Zappa |
$2,455.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Dot Newton |
$2,590.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Huu Van Nguyen |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Jacqueline Huntley |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$2,575.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda Aitken |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Natalie Sangalli |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Paul Miles |
$2,405.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Cr Sonet Coetzee |
$2,690.46 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Mayor Tracey Roberts |
$11,144.47 |
|
|
|
Monthly Meeting Attendance Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004104 |
13/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004105 |
13/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$530,030.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Aveling Homes Pty Ltd |
$6,834.29 |
|
|
|
Refund - 2 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
BDD Australia Pty Ltd |
$536.70 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ben Trager Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
JCorp Pty Ltd |
$1,133.32 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application Fee - Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads WA |
$28,154.61 |
|
|
|
Signs & Linemarking - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Linemarking - Badgerup Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Materon Investments WA Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Christopher Bombak |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Daniel Simms |
$64.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Broadband Usage 01 - 28.02.2021 80% |
|
|
|
|
Mr David Barnes |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Matthew Witts |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Spyros Mark Spyrou |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Ms Vanessa De Mello |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Ms Vera Bowman |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Satterley Property Group |
$952.62 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street Lighting Tariff - Land Development |
|
|
|
|
Simsai Construction Group Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
SSB Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$25,546.38 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Trailer Parts Pty Ltd |
$463.06 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Utopia Industries Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$3,840.52 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wow Group (WA) Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004106 |
15/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia Post |
$34,997.40 |
|
|
|
Postage Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004107 |
15/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Al Mustafa Community Association Incorporated |
$4,734.00 |
|
|
|
Iraqi Community And Cultural Day |
|
|
|
|
Isentia Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
WA Election Briefing - 10/02/2021 - 09/04/2021 - Communications & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Thinkfield |
$3,630.00 |
|
|
|
Programming Of Survey - ICT |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Contracting Pty Ltd |
$618,622.90 |
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Groyne 1 - Maintenance & Upgrade Works - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004108 |
16/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gillmore Electrical Services |
$142,585.30 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 3 - Paloma Park Oval Floodlighting Upgrade - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004109 |
20/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
A2Z Sports Pty Ltd |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Wish W11 Shuttlecocks - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
ABM Landscaping |
$4,450.05 |
|
|
|
Relay Brick Paving - Civic Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$927.96 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Activ Foundation Incorporated |
$1,149.50 |
|
|
|
Mulch Garden Beds - Memorial - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Acurix Networks Pty Ltd |
$4,870.80 |
|
|
|
Monitoring, Licensing & Support - April 2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$17,344.47 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
AFGRI Equipment Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,274.79 |
|
|
|
Mower Blades - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Air Communications |
$4,804.36 |
|
|
|
Antenna Relocation - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Air Liquide Australia |
$221.76 |
|
|
|
Cylinder Hire - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$225.00 |
|
|
|
Wreath - 200th Anniversary Of Greece - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
|
Arrangement - M Cockman 90th Birthday - Office Of The Mayor |
|
|
|
|
Animal Pest Management Services |
$12,375.00 |
|
|
|
Fox Control & Activity Surveys - 12 Locations - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Aqua Attack Drilling |
$2,090.00 |
|
|
|
Small Bore Decommission - Hinckley Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Remove Pump - Hinckley Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Armaguard |
$191.59 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection For The City |
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Surfaces Pty Ltd |
$32,989.00 |
|
|
|
Cricket Pitch Covers - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Audio View Lifestyles Pty Ltd |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Repair TV - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
AUSQ Training |
$339.00 |
|
|
|
Basic Worksite Traffic Management - 1 Attendee - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$11,686.72 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Communications & Media Authority |
$1,477.00 |
|
|
|
Licence Renewal - ICT |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$2,167.88 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet / Stores |
|
|
|
|
Biologic Environmental Survey Pty Ltd |
$7,658.81 |
|
|
|
2020 Spring Biological Survey - New Animal Care Centre - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Bladon WA Pty Ltd |
$1,785.58 |
|
|
|
Staff Uniforms - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group |
$737.70 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Yardoo Court - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Boya Equipment |
$489.98 |
|
|
|
2 Backpack Sprayers - Parks |
|
|
|
|
BrainBox Advisory |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$10,526.23 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bring Couriers |
$636.42 |
|
|
|
Courier Services - Health |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$8,406.97 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet / Stores |
|
|
|
|
Bunzl Limited |
$712.69 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Business Growth AU |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$4,389.29 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$3,190.57 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Waste - Mirrabooka Avenue - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cathara Consulting Pty Ltd |
$4,290.00 |
|
|
|
FMIS Implementation Services - 22.03.2021 - 28.03.2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$24,591.79 |
|
|
|
Computer Equipment - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$5,474.16 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$1,596.92 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Blessing Of The Roads - Photographer - Road And Traffic Services |
|
|
|
|
Photography - 3 Citizenship Ceremonies - Events |
|
|
|
|
Christophe Canato |
$700.00 |
|
|
|
Documentation - For Country, For Nation Exhibition - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Churchill Imaging |
$95.00 |
|
|
|
10 Hours Of Photo Restore - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
City of Joondalup |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
|
Sponsorship - Virtual Mission Indonesia 01.04.2021 - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
CK Maloney Surveying |
$12,433.30 |
|
|
|
Detail Survey - Yanchep Industrial Area - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Feature And Contour Survey - Kingsway Sporting Complex - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cleanaway Equipment Services Pty Ltd |
$414.77 |
|
|
|
Parts Washer - Monthly Rental - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$520.00 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd |
$4,911.15 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$566.90 |
|
|
|
Beverages - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Coffey And Tea |
$3,712.50 |
|
|
|
Discover Wanneroo Tourism Strategy - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Aquatics Australia |
$619.85 |
|
|
|
Repair Pump Leak - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Aquatics Maintenance Re-Active Works - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Commissioner of Police |
$33.40 |
|
|
|
2 Volunteer Police Checks - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$106.70 |
|
|
|
Signs - Quinns - Assets Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$1,122.00 |
|
|
|
Monthly Fire Equipment Tests - March 2021 - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
CS Legal |
$90,712.59 |
|
|
|
Court Fees - Rating Services |
|
|
|
|
CW Brands Pty Ltd |
$611.16 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Datavoice Communications Pty Ltd |
$528.00 |
|
|
|
Reconfigure Phone Message Options - Aquamotion - ICT |
|
|
|
|
DC Golf |
$91,666.10 |
|
|
|
Commission Fees - March 2021 Carramar Golf Course |
|
|
|
|
Commission Fees - March 2021 Marangaroo Golf Course |
|
|
|
|
Delos Delta Pty Ltd |
$15,125.00 |
|
|
|
Community Engagement Report - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Delville Smith |
$400.00 |
|
|
|
Public Art Maintenance - Butler Community Centre - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$29,823.55 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Various Locations - Engineering / Assets |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$22,755.54 |
|
|
|
Drain Cleaning / Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$82.81 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ecoburbia |
$2,475.00 |
|
|
|
3 Sustainability Workshops - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Edge People Management |
$2,997.93 |
|
|
|
Case Management Return To Work Monitoring - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Review Job Dictionaries - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Ergonomic Assessment - OSH |
|
|
|
|
ENSO Construction Pty Ltd |
$48,852.95 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 1 - Kingsway Indoor Stadium - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Industries Pty Ltd |
$2,431.57 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
EPM Partners Pty Ltd |
$4,840.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Services - Document Approvals Via Power Automate License - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Credit Rating Pty Ltd |
$2,965.16 |
|
|
|
Company Financial Checks - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$248.50 |
|
|
|
Carpet Top Footrest & Keyboard - Desk Equipment |
|
|
|
|
Exteria |
$5,971.90 |
|
|
|
Picnic Shelter And Table - Hinckley Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Forch Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,806.42 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Forrest And Forrest Games |
$17,926.70 |
|
|
|
Nematode Analysis - 37 Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Golf Course Benchmarking - Carramar & Marangaroo - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$143.00 |
|
|
|
Coat Intake With Fireproof Paint - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Fusion Applications Pty Ltd |
$6,600.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting Fees - OICSs Architecture Integration - ICT |
|
|
|
|
GC Sales (WA) |
$385.00 |
|
|
|
Keys For Bin Poles - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$107,364.87 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works - Various Locations For The City |
|
|
|
|
GHD Pty Ltd |
$22,282.22 |
|
|
|
Assets Structural Assessment - Coastal And Parks - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Gillmore Electrical Services |
$23,547.70 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 2 - Teodoro Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Grasstrees Australia |
$902.00 |
|
|
|
Grass Tree Watering - Hardcastle Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Green Options Pty Ltd |
$9,436.35 |
|
|
|
Mowing - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Greens Hiab Service |
$968.00 |
|
|
|
Hiab Hire - AFL Goals - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Griffiths Architects |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Design Review Panel Meeting - 04.02.2021 - Approval Services |
|
|
|
|
Hall & Wilcox |
$7,400.80 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hang Art Pty Ltd |
$2,227.50 |
|
|
|
De-Install For Country For Nation - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$554.40 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Scenic Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Harvey Norman AV/TI Superstore Joondalup |
$937.20 |
|
|
|
4 Digital Cameras - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Hickey Constructions Pty Ltd |
$1,474.00 |
|
|
|
Replace Garden Kerbing - Civic Centre - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Bullnose Capping Repairs - Spinifex Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Construction Machinery Pty Ltd |
$703.41 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Hodge Collard Preston Unit Trust |
$542.74 |
|
|
|
Architectural Consultancy - Aquamotion - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Horizon West Landscape Construction |
$245,640.56 |
|
|
|
Construction Works - Hinckley Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$408.13 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Hoses - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Houspect WA |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Dilapidation Inspection - Quinns Mindarie SLSC - Property |
|
|
|
|
Hydra Storm |
$1,386.00 |
|
|
|
Iron Grate - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hydroquip Pumps |
$5,214.00 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Pump Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$88,988.39 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Identity Perth |
$9,897.25 |
|
|
|
Develop CoW Corporate Council Crest - Communication & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Design Logo And Brand Development - Communication & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$997.70 |
|
|
|
Teardrop Banner (Flag) - Girrawheen Community Garden - Community Services |
|
|
|
|
2 Social Distancing Corflutes - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Sticker For Plaque - Leatherback Park |
|
|
|
|
A-Frame Corflutes - Create Space - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd |
$266.20 |
|
|
|
Civic Centre Foyer - Plant Hire - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$1,806.20 |
|
|
|
Toilet Hire - Blessing Of The Roads - Road & Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Portable Toilet Hire - Pictures In The Park - Hocking - Events |
|
|
|
|
Instant Weighing Systems |
$2,018.50 |
|
|
|
Test & Calibrate Compuload - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$32,081.43 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intelife Group |
$4,501.20 |
|
|
|
Light Car Cleaning - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
International Valuation & Property Services |
$2,970.00 |
|
|
|
Valuation - Portion Of Council Depot - Property |
|
|
|
|
Iron Mountain Australia Group Pty Ltd |
$4,850.08 |
|
|
|
Document Management Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ixom Operations Pty Ltd |
$207.33 |
|
|
|
Disinfection Of Pools Chlorine Gas Supply - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$4,470.58 |
|
|
|
PPE & Tool Purchases For The City |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$1,032.02 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
JDSI Consulting Engineers |
$7,563.74 |
|
|
|
Civil Consultancy - Butler North District Open Space - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Jodie Aedy |
$1,281.00 |
|
|
|
Graphic Design - Team Development And Training - Communications & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Printing - 15 A5 Notepads - Communications And Brand |
|
|
|
|
Design And Supply Of Artwork - Youth Week 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Design For Community Services Map - Communications & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Kerb Direct Kerbing |
$268.18 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Berriman Drive (Stage 2) - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Kinetic IT Pty Ltd |
$10,541.27 |
|
|
|
Enhanced Security Services March 2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd |
$6.40 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$1,312.92 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kyocera Document Solutions |
$4,275.38 |
|
|
|
Photocopier Meter Reading For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$20,240.19 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$61,339.92 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Les Mills Asia Pacific |
$918.00 |
|
|
|
Subscription Fees - Group Fitness - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Living Turf |
$3,630.00 |
|
|
|
Supply Fertiliser - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Local Government Professionals Australia WA |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
SCORM File - E-Learning - People & Culture |
|
|
|
|
Mackay Urban Design |
$962.50 |
|
|
|
Design Review Panel Meeting - 25.03.2021 - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,402.55 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet / Stores |
|
|
|
|
Mammoth Equipment & Exhausts Pty Ltd |
$1,595.00 |
|
|
|
Ecoblue - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$7,066.04 |
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd |
$8,942.56 |
|
|
|
Talking My Language Project - Promotional Mini Bin - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Bin Lids - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$1,837.00 |
|
|
|
Roller - Mirrabooka - Assets |
|
|
|
|
McLeods |
$8,973.49 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Messages On Hold |
$789.99 |
|
|
|
Messages On Hold Services - Communications & Brand |
|
|
|
|
Michael Joseph Cruise |
$1,108.00 |
|
|
|
Videography - Youth Leadership Forum - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$5,103.28 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$183,135.65 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$3,977.60 |
|
|
|
Repair Playground Equipment - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$444.40 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Navman Wireless Australia Pty Ltd |
$286.00 |
|
|
|
Fit GPS & Keypad - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Noma Pty Ltd |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Design Review Panel Meeting - 25.03.2021 - Approvals |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$478.00 |
|
|
|
Incorrect Amount Charged |
|
|
|
|
Honda Safety Chaps - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Leaf Blower - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
OCP Sales - Omnific Enterprises P/L |
$1,016.76 |
|
|
|
Radio Repairs - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
OEM Group Pty Ltd |
$206.17 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$22,815.89 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Online Social Butterfly |
$1,650.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Murakami Trading |
|
|
|
|
Oracle Customer Management Solution Pty Ltd |
$11,782.90 |
|
|
|
After Hours Calls Service - Customer Relations |
|
|
|
|
Paperbark Technologies Pty Ltd |
$1,205.00 |
|
|
|
Wonambi Park Arborist Report - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Parker Black & Forrest |
$5,756.30 |
|
|
|
Locking Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Peopleistic |
$625.00 |
|
|
|
5 Extended Disc Profile Surveys - People And Culture |
|
|
|
|
Perth Detailing Centre |
$291.00 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Community Transport Buses |
|
|
|
|
Photo Perth Wholesale Pty Ltd |
$242.53 |
|
|
|
Stationery Items - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Plantrite |
$2,603.66 |
|
|
|
15% Deposit - Tubestock - Winter 2021 - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$3,630.00 |
|
|
|
Playground Inspections - March - Parks |
|
|
|
|
PLE Computers |
$32.00 |
|
|
|
HDMI Adapter - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Pool Robotics Perth |
$297.30 |
|
|
|
Repair Cleaner - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Powerhouse Batteries Pty Ltd |
$513.62 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Batteries - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$13,067.86 |
|
|
|
Alarm / CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print And Sign Co |
$885.50 |
|
|
|
10 Pull Up Banners Reskin - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Programmed Integrated Workforce |
$3,668.15 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$198.00 |
|
|
|
Call Out - 2 Wheel Changes - City Vehicles |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing WA Pty Ltd |
$9,312.60 |
|
|
|
Fencing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
REM Consulting |
$5,032.82 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Rent A Dingo |
$352.00 |
|
|
|
Dingo Day Hire - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Repco |
$397.32 |
|
|
|
Flood Light - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$2,379.10 |
|
|
|
Image Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$225,558.99 |
|
|
|
Road Resurfacing - Baretta Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Asset Renewal Program - Pappas Street - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Road Resurfacing - Lindsay Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$131.14 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
RW Quantity Surveyors |
$1,430.00 |
|
|
|
Quantity Surveying Services - Abbeville Oval Extension - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue Equipment |
$203.50 |
|
|
|
Marangaroo Family Centre |
|
|
|
|
Sage Consulting Engineers |
$2,464.00 |
|
|
|
Sports Lighting - Belhaven Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
SAI Global Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,125.90 |
|
|
|
Re-Certification Audit - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Annual Registration - 04.06.2021 - 04.06.2022 - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$168.00 |
|
|
|
Brickies Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Shred-X |
$298.76 |
|
|
|
Shredding Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sifting Sands |
$2,260.60 |
|
|
|
Sand Sieve - Various Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sigma Chemicals |
$864.60 |
|
|
|
Photometer Tablets - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Site Environmental & Remediation Services Pty Ltd |
$13,233.00 |
|
|
|
Asbestos Removal - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Site Sentry Pty Ltd |
$223.30 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$62.62 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Skyline Landscape Services (WA) |
$26,970.16 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Smartbuilt Perth Pty Ltd |
$99.00 |
|
|
|
Pest Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Softfall Guys |
$363.00 |
|
|
|
Softfall Repairs - Maritime Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$403.60 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sports Medicine Australia |
$2,880.00 |
|
|
|
Provide First Aid Course - 21 Candidates - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Training Program - Taping Course - 18 Candidates - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$9,036.50 |
|
|
|
Replace Wicket Turf - Ridgewood Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Synthetic Turf - St Andrews Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$1,231.92 |
|
|
|
Training Services / First Aid Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Bearings |
$108.02 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Pump Services |
$1,430.00 |
|
|
|
Attend Sewer Pump Alarm - Koondoola Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Stiles Electrical |
$78,106.47 |
|
|
|
Progress Claim 2 - Ridgewood Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$742.30 |
|
|
|
Brooms - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Surekleen Products |
$111.32 |
|
|
|
Sure Power Truck Wash - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Surf Life Saving WA Incorporated |
$72,307.93 |
|
|
|
Beach Safety Services - Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Tactiv Pty Ltd |
$1,584.00 |
|
|
|
Hosted Agreement: Additional Lite Users - 17.03.2021 - 17.09.2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Taldara Industries Pty Ltd |
$695.07 |
|
|
|
Disposable Cups - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$2,156.00 |
|
|
|
Consulting - Jo Gray - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$21,093.74 |
|
|
|
Locations of Services - Various Locations - Assets |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for New Dealership Trust |
$443.10 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Keys - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee for Talis Unit Trust |
$13,626.45 |
|
|
|
Install & Monitor Gas Wells - Wangara Landfill - Property |
|
|
|
|
Thirty4 Pty Ltd |
$211.20 |
|
|
|
Qnav Mobile Data Monthly Subscription - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
TJ Depiazzi & Sons |
$52,118.77 |
|
|
|
Mulch Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$255.54 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Toro Australia Group Sales Pty Ltd |
$2,357.08 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Total Landscape Redevelopment Services Pty Ltd |
$11,110.00 |
|
|
|
Play Area Upgrade - Aquamotion - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Tree Planting & Watering |
$3,828.00 |
|
|
|
Watering - Booderee Cooloola Kalbarri - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$21,440.65 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Electrical Works - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Truck Centre WA Pty Ltd |
$1,128.51 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Turf Care WA Pty Ltd |
$37,901.36 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Two Rocks SES Unit |
$8,195.83 |
|
|
|
Local Government Grant Scheme - 4th Quarter - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Valvoline (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$9,570.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Oils / Fuels - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Vocus Communications |
$247.50 |
|
|
|
NBN Connection - Wire Track YTRAC - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
WA Garage Doors Pty Ltd |
$264.00 |
|
|
|
Door Repairs - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$736.28 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Webinar - How To Get Your Business In The Media - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$16,797.38 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Water Technology Pty Ltd |
$13,427.48 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Mindarie Breakwater - Coastal Projects |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$4,577.10 |
|
|
|
Turfing Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Australian Local Government Association |
$70.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Transport And Roads Forum - 1 Attendee - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$825.00 |
|
|
|
Servicing Of Grease Traps - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
West-Sure Group Pty Ltd |
$287.32 |
|
|
|
Cash Collection Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
William Buck Consulting (WA) Pty Ltd |
$22,907.50 |
|
|
|
Probity Adviser Services - Contracts & Procurement |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$34,314.83 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Workshed Children's Mosaics |
$2,046.00 |
|
|
|
Mosaic Structures Conservation - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Wrenoil |
$16.50 |
|
|
|
Collection Of Waste Oil From Wangara |
|
|
|
|
Yanchep Beach Joint Venture |
$8,839.58 |
|
|
|
Yanchep Hub - April 2021 - Rent, Variable Outgoings, Rates And Taxes - Property |
|
|
|
|
Zetta Group |
$54,372.94 |
|
|
|
Network Managed Service - Wanneroo - ICT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004110 |
20/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$3,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004111 |
20/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,674.89 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$562.21 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$630.25 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$652.14 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$442.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004112 |
20/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Addstyle Constructions Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Aleksandra Velkovski |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Aquatic Leisure Technologies |
$147.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Development Application - Exempt |
|
|
|
|
Australian Library & Information Association |
$2,060.00 |
|
|
|
Membership Renewal - 02.05.2021 - 01.05.2022 - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Manufacturing Workers Union |
$151.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Services Union |
$593.70 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$559,692.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Celebration Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
CFMEU |
$120.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Child Support Agency |
$967.02 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Payroll Rates |
$6,240.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Social Club |
$676.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Cr Linda Aitken |
$702.73 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance December 2021 & Clothing Allowance |
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage |
$19,600.00 |
|
|
|
Application Fee Accepted By The City - Applicant With Architecture Studio - Reference DAP/21/01970 Address Lot 8019 Joseph Banks Boulevard Proposal New Learning Block Planning & Development - Applicant: Urbis - Marieka Van De Bergh - Dap Reference: Dap/2101973 - Property Address: Lot 408 (19) Neerabup Road Clarkson - Proposal: Supermarket, Liquor Store & Specialty Retail |
|
|
|
|
Application Fee Accepted By The City On Behalf Of The Development Assessment Panel - Planning And Development - Applicant: Planning Solutions - Joshua Carmody - Dap Reference: Dap/15/00813 - Property Address: Lot 2335 (79) Gnangara Road Wangara - Proposal: Modification Of Existing Access To Allow For A New Right-In Entry To Approved Showroom, Warehouse, Recreation Centre And Convenience Store Development |
|
|
|
|
Father Dariusz Basiaga |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Fleet Network |
$1,058.13 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging 30.03.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
HBF Health Limited |
$643.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Home Group WA Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$16,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 8 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Landgate |
$7,236.26 |
|
|
|
Gross Rental Valuations Chargeable 20.03.2021 - 02.04.2021 - Rates |
|
|
|
|
LGRCEU |
$1,547.76 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Main Roads WA |
$33,677.55 |
|
|
|
Signs & Linemarking - Marmion Avenue Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Maxxia Pty Ltd |
$9,138.93 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Miss Gillian Margaret Caie |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Mr Adam Smith |
$150.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Mr Adrian Williams |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Anthony Brown |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Carlo Latoza |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mr Dereck Smith |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr George Irving |
$30.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund – Sterilisation |
|
|
|
|
Mr Graham Cook |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr James Barr |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Kevin Jones |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Luca Zanini |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mr Rocky Postrak |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Simon Ray |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund – Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mr Ty Matson |
$1,350.00 |
|
|
|
Study Assistance - 50% Reimbursement - Economics For Managers |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Francine Friedli |
$392.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Fitness Australia Accreditation - Aquamotion |
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Online Fitness Education Course |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Gemma Quarrell |
$80.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Deceased |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Jade Croot |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Lauren Frame |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Lauren Guagliardo |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Ms Leanne Gayle |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Optus |
$1,169.74 |
|
|
|
Phone Charges For The City |
|
|
|
|
Paragon Homes Group Pty Ltd |
$1,020.18 |
|
|
|
Refund - Development Application - Withdrawn |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$1,342.31 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$8,146.36 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
SSB Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$9,875.47 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Ventura Home Group Pty Ltd |
$2,966.81 |
|
|
|
Refund - Building Application - Duplicate |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$4,753.73 |
|
|
|
Sewerage Manhole - Mirrabooka / Rawlinson - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004113 |
27/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
RJ Vincent & Co |
$1,682,534.55 |
|
|
|
Payment Certificate 10 - Sports Facilities - Halesworth Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004114 |
27/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
A & S Butcher |
$3,190.00 |
|
|
|
Fit Roller Blinds - Yanchep Beach Road - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Action Glass & Aluminium |
$4,083.42 |
|
|
|
Glazing Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Acurix Networks Pty Ltd |
$2,777.50 |
|
|
|
Wi-Fi Access Service - Buckingham / Cockman Houses - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Traffic Management |
$8,197.86 |
|
|
|
Traffic Control Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Alexander House of Flowers |
$115.00 |
|
|
|
Floral Arrangement - G Sinagra - Mayors Office |
|
|
|
|
All Perth Fencing |
$5,557.50 |
|
|
|
Install Fence - Frangipani Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Aslab Pty Ltd |
$13,315.50 |
|
|
|
Permeability Testing - Hartman Road Sump - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sampling And Testing - Franklin / Rousset - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Asphalt Testing - Joondalup Drive - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Astro Synthetic Surfaces Pty Ltd |
$12,980.00 |
|
|
|
Cricket Pitch Covers - Halesworth Park - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Ati-Mirage Training & Business Solutions |
$2,255.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Project Management - Community Planning |
|
|
|
|
AUSQ Training |
$420.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Basic Worksite Traffic Management - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Australian Airconditioning Services Pty Ltd |
$477.04 |
|
|
|
Airconditioning Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Australian Institute of Management Resource Development Centre Incorporated |
$1,420.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Applied Project Management 06 - 08.04.2021 - 1 Attendee - Finance |
|
|
|
|
AV Truck Service Pty Ltd |
$745.16 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ball & Doggett Pty Ltd |
$412.34 |
|
|
|
Paper Supplies - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Better Pets and Gardens Wangara |
$221.70 |
|
|
|
Animal Care Centre Supplies - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Boral Construction Materials Group |
$3,804.18 |
|
|
|
Concrete Mix - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
BP Australia Ltd |
$5,105.80 |
|
|
|
Unleaded Fuel - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Brian Zucal & Associates |
$756.25 |
|
|
|
Valuation - 190 Mary Street - Property |
|
|
|
|
Bridgestone Australia Limited |
$287.56 |
|
|
|
Tyre Fitting Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Bucher Municipal Pty Ltd |
$2,234.56 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Bunnings Pty Ltd |
$102.00 |
|
|
|
Safety Traffic Cones - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Cabcharge |
$296.95 |
|
|
|
Cabcharge For The City |
|
|
|
|
Car Care Motor Company Pty Ltd |
$62.70 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Service - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Carramar Resources Industries |
$1,268.38 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Rubble - Assets / Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Castledex |
$528.00 |
|
|
|
Tambour Door Cabinet - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory |
$30,833.28 |
|
|
|
Legal Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cat Welfare Society Incorporated |
$4,300.00 |
|
|
|
Daily Impound Fees - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
CDM Australia Pty Ltd |
$36,548.60 |
|
|
|
Professional Services - Avaya Server Work - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Dell Computers & Accessories - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Chandler Macleod Group Limited |
$7,808.89 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Cherry's Catering |
$2,816.09 |
|
|
|
Catering Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Chris Kershaw Photography |
$880.00 |
|
|
|
Photography - Splendid Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Claire Davenhall |
$800.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop - All Washed Up 2021 - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Clark Equipment Sales Pty Ltd |
$106.71 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Clinipath Pathology |
$173.50 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Coastal Navigation Solutions |
$898.70 |
|
|
|
Mosaic Installation - Ridgewood Park - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Coca Cola Amatil Pty Ltd |
$238.88 |
|
|
|
Beverages For Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Corsign (WA) Pty Ltd |
$13,784.04 |
|
|
|
Street Name Plates - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Signs - Parking - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign Installation Accessories - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Sign - Wait Until Gate Closed - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Stickers - No Through Road - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Critical Fire Protection & Training Pty Ltd |
$1,567.50 |
|
|
|
Fire Protection Equipment Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Daimler Trucks Perth |
$629.31 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Filters - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Datavoice Communications Pty Ltd |
$34,798.50 |
|
|
|
Avaya Maintenance - ICT |
|
|
|
|
DDLS Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,320.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Power Bi Fundamentals - 08.04.2021 - 1 Attendee - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Department of the Premier and Cabinet |
$92.70 |
|
|
|
District Planning Scheme No 2 - Amendment No 184 - Planning |
|
|
|
|
Direct Communications |
$418.00 |
|
|
|
Onsite Call Out - Yanchep Communications 19.03.2021 - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Dowsing Group Pty Ltd |
$270,209.12 |
|
|
|
Pathway Works - Garden Park Drive And Vincent Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Labour - Caribbean Court / Melbourne Loop - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Drainflow Services Pty Ltd |
$10,719.50 |
|
|
|
Drain Cleaning / Road Sweeping Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Driscolls Land Surveyors |
$6,688.99 |
|
|
|
Lease Survey - Ground Floor Building 2 Civic Centre - Property |
|
|
|
|
Drovers Vet Hospital Pty Ltd |
$1,008.15 |
|
|
|
Veterinary Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
E & MJ Rosher |
$2,008.88 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ecoburbia |
$2,475.00 |
|
|
|
3 Sustainability Workshops - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Ecoscape Australia Pty Ltd |
$6,941.00 |
|
|
|
EIA Preparation - Neerabup Assessments - Portion 2 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Elliotts Irrigation Pty Ltd |
$36,423.81 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Equifax Australasia Workforce Solution Pty Limited |
$415.80 |
|
|
|
Australian Criminal History Check - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Ergolink |
$455.99 |
|
|
|
Office Chair - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Flick Anticimex Pty Ltd |
$3,954.46 |
|
|
|
Sanitary Waste Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Frontline Fire & Rescue Equipment |
$689.34 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Fusion Applications Pty Ltd |
$11,880.00 |
|
|
|
Consultancy Services - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Geoff's Tree Service Pty Ltd |
$35,652.26 |
|
|
|
Pruning Works For The City |
|
|
|
|
Global Drone Solutions |
$240.00 |
|
|
|
Drone Pilot Licence - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd |
$1,240.80 |
|
|
|
Concrete Works - Various Locations - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Hart Sport |
$977.50 |
|
|
|
Work Out Mats - Kingsway |
|
|
|
|
Hays Personnel Services |
$3,545.21 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Hose Right |
$250.01 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Iconic Property Services Pty Ltd |
$14,335.81 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Imagesource Digital Solutions |
$187.00 |
|
|
|
Printing - Draped Table Cloth - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Instant Toilets & Showers Pty Ltd |
$1,235.30 |
|
|
|
Toilet Hire - Driver Reviver Event - Transport And Traffic |
|
|
|
|
Integrity Industrial Pty Ltd |
$18,974.37 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Intelife Group |
$20,694.76 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Cleaning - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Irri-Tronics |
$148.50 |
|
|
|
Repairs - Hunter Decoder Programmer - Parks |
|
|
|
|
J Blackwood & Son Ltd |
$4,241.06 |
|
|
|
PPE & Uniforms Issues For The City |
|
|
|
|
James Bennett Pty Ltd |
$2,150.56 |
|
|
|
Book Purchases - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
K2 Audiovisual Pty Ltd |
$15,669.78 |
|
|
|
65 Inch Display & Video Conferencing & Local Wireless Contact Sharing - Eucalyptus Room - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Equipment Service - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd |
$4,462.93 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Kleenit |
$961.15 |
|
|
|
Graffiti Removal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Landcare Weed Control |
$482.09 |
|
|
|
Site Maintenance - Forrest Grove Revegetation - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Latitude Perth Operations Pty Ltd |
$425.00 |
|
|
|
Outing - School Holiday Program - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Laundry Express |
$334.05 |
|
|
|
Cleaning Of Linen - Council & Corporate Support |
|
|
|
|
LD Total |
$6,822.74 |
|
|
|
Landscape Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Lessen with Peg – Rethink Waste |
$1,200.00 |
|
|
|
3 Sustainability Workshops - Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Let's All Party |
$12,470.00 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Various Locations - Events |
|
|
|
|
Lobel Events |
$2,200.00 |
|
|
|
Festoon Lighting And Generators - Splendid Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Major Motors |
$1,498.97 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Marketforce Pty Ltd |
$20,258.00 |
|
|
|
Design & Produce New Waste Plan - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Advertising Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mayday Earthmoving |
$23,914.00 |
|
|
|
Heavy Equipment Hire For The City |
|
|
|
|
McGees Property |
$3,300.00 |
|
|
|
Market Valuation Advices - Opportunity Street - Property Services |
|
|
|
|
Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$3,998.78 |
|
|
|
Casual Labour For The City |
|
|
|
|
Mindarie Regional Council |
$581,203.72 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Miracle Recreation Equipment Pty Ltd |
$9,827.18 |
|
|
|
Playground Equipment Repairs - Various Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Moore Australia (WA) Pty Ltd As Agent |
$4,620.00 |
|
|
|
Financial Reporting Workshop - 3 Attendees - Finance |
|
|
|
|
NAPA - GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd |
$895.32 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet / Stores |
|
|
|
|
Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd |
$12,632.58 |
|
|
|
Beach Access Way Maintenance - 6 Locations - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Navman Wireless Australia Pty Ltd |
$18.15 |
|
|
|
Monthly Charge For Access - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Northern Lawnmower & Chainsaw Specialists |
$775.50 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Nutrien Ag Solutions Limited |
$314.12 |
|
|
|
Various Items - Parks |
|
|
|
|
On Tap Plumbing & Gas Pty Ltd |
$3,745.14 |
|
|
|
Plumbing Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Online Social Butterfly |
$1,100.00 |
|
|
|
Economic Recovery Fund - Business Advisory & Support - Oz West Driving Academy - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Penske Power Systems Pty Ltd |
$997.92 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Play Check |
$18,150.00 |
|
|
|
Bi-Annual Playground Audit - 110 Parks - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Porter Consulting Engineers |
$4,248.75 |
|
|
|
Detailed Design And Documentation - Lenore Road Duplication - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Powerhouse Batteries Pty Ltd |
$1,084.51 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Battery - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Prestige Alarms |
$20,021.32 |
|
|
|
Alarm / CCTV Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Print And Sign Co |
$18,542.71 |
|
|
|
Banners - 3 Bin Waste Campaign - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Floor Graphics - 3 Bin Campaign - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Pritchard Francis Consulting Pty Ltd |
$12,475.32 |
|
|
|
Engineering Consultancy - Yanchep Lagoon Infrastructure Strategy - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Promolab |
$7,144.50 |
|
|
|
5 Full Colour With Logo Tablecloths - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
1,200 750ml Sport Drink Bottles & 500 50Ml Sunscreen Tubes - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Public Sector Training Solutions Pty Ltd |
$2,175.00 |
|
|
|
Training - Certificate IV In Government Investigations - 1 Attendee - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
QLM Label Makers Pty Ltd |
$1,060.18 |
|
|
|
Labels - Flatten Boxes - Waste Services |
|
|
|
|
Qualcon Laboratories |
$561.00 |
|
|
|
Particle Testing - Muchea - Parks |
|
|
|
|
RAC Motoring & Services Pty Ltd |
$793.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Call Out Fees - Fleet Assets |
|
|
|
|
Ralph Beattie Bosworth |
$1,980.00 |
|
|
|
Make Good Works - Wanneroo Civic Centre - Property |
|
|
|
|
Redfish Technologies Pty Ltd |
$176,080.30 |
|
|
|
Audio Visual Upgrade - Council Chambers - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Reliable Fencing WA Pty Ltd |
$842.16 |
|
|
|
Installation Gates - Montrose Park - Projects |
|
|
|
|
Rent A Dingo |
$719.00 |
|
|
|
Install Goals - Addison Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Returned & Services League Yanchep-Two Rocks Sub-branch |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Support Delivery Of The Anzac Day Commemorations |
|
|
|
|
2021 At Yanchep Sports And Social Club And Yanchep National Park |
|
|
|
|
Ricoh Australia Pty Ltd |
$1,432.43 |
|
|
|
Copier Lease Charges - Print Room |
|
|
|
|
Road & Traffic Services |
$253.00 |
|
|
|
Spotting For Linemarking - Beach Road - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roads 2000 |
$429,388.85 |
|
|
|
Granit Asphalt - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Road Works - Berriman Drive Stage 1 & 2 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Road Works - Beretta Road Stage 1 - Assets |
|
|
|
|
Roy Gripske & Sons Pty Ltd |
$86.39 |
|
|
|
Stock - Stores Issues |
|
|
|
|
Safety And Rescue Equipment |
$1,845.25 |
|
|
|
Height Safety Equipment Inspection - Leatherback Park |
|
|
|
|
Relocate Anchor Point - Alexander Care Centre |
|
|
|
|
Replace Anchor Point - WRC |
|
|
|
|
Replace Signage - Girrawheen Hub & Wanneroo Recreation Centre |
|
|
|
|
Disable Anchor Point - The Heights Community House |
|
|
|
|
Sanax Medical And First Aid Supplies |
$1,327.28 |
|
|
|
Sunscreen - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Scott Print |
$1,250.70 |
|
|
|
Printing - Business Cards - The CEO |
|
|
|
|
Printing - Brochures - Talking My Language - Place Management |
|
|
|
|
Seabreeze Landscape Supplies |
$192.00 |
|
|
|
Brickies Sand - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Site Sentry Pty Ltd |
$7,708.80 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - WRC - Waste |
|
|
|
|
SJ McKee Maintenance Pty Ltd |
$6,295.00 |
|
|
|
Repair Works - Various Locations - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Skipper Transport Parts |
$248.27 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
Smoke & Mirrors Audio Visual |
$1,436.30 |
|
|
|
Equipment Hire - Splendid Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Sonic Healthplus Pty Ltd |
$157.85 |
|
|
|
Medical Fees For The City |
|
|
|
|
Sport and Recreation Surfaces |
$1,870.00 |
|
|
|
Tennis Court Maintenance - Elliot - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Sports Surfaces |
$3,558.50 |
|
|
|
Repair Cracks - Kingsway - Parks |
|
|
|
|
St John Ambulance Western Australia |
$4,278.30 |
|
|
|
First Aid Supplies / Training For The City |
|
|
|
|
Event Health Services - Skate Jam / Coaching Session - Youth Services |
|
|
|
|
Stewart & Heaton Clothing Company Pty Ltd |
$106.17 |
|
|
|
Freight Charges - March 2021 - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery (Perth) Pty Ltd |
$164,393.17 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd |
$6,011.73 |
|
|
|
Refuse Disposal For The City |
|
|
|
|
Emptying Of Confidential Shredding Bin - Cr Coetzee |
|
|
|
|
Sunny Industrial Brushware |
$541.20 |
|
|
|
Asphalt Rake - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Super Clean Bins |
$2,502.50 |
|
|
|
175 Bins Cleanup - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Tangaroa Blue Foundation Ltd |
$786.50 |
|
|
|
Beach Cleanup - All Washed Up Event - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Technology One Limited |
$2,197.80 |
|
|
|
Training - Analytical CIA 30.03.2021 - 2 Attendees - Payroll |
|
|
|
|
Teresa Newton |
$600.00 |
|
|
|
Provision Of DJ/MC Services - Splendid Park - Events |
|
|
|
|
Terravac Vacuum Excavations Pty Ltd |
$7,485.97 |
|
|
|
Locations Of Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
The Rigging Shed |
$2,469.61 |
|
|
|
Testing / Tagging Equipment - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
The Royal Life Saving Society Australia |
$19,057.06 |
|
|
|
Pool Inspections - March 2020 - Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Toll Transport Pty Ltd |
$41.94 |
|
|
|
Courier Services For The City |
|
|
|
|
Total Eden Pty Ltd |
$645.17 |
|
|
|
Reticulation Items - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Calming Australia Pty Ltd |
$25,503.50 |
|
|
|
Replace Land Dividers - Salerno Drive - Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Triton Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd |
$66.00 |
|
|
|
Electrical Works - Fleming Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Trophy Shop Australia |
$13.70 |
|
|
|
Name Badge - Community Development |
|
|
|
|
UES (Int'L) Pty Ltd |
$378.40 |
|
|
|
Toolbox - Fleet |
|
|
|
|
Ungerboeck Systems International Pty Ltd |
$473.00 |
|
|
|
Remote Consulting - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Valvoline (Australia) Pty Ltd |
$1,002.14 |
|
|
|
Oil Supplies - Stores Stock |
|
|
|
|
Vet 24 |
$373.00 |
|
|
|
Euthanasia And Cremation Services - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
WA Hino Sales & Service |
$367.25 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Spare Parts - Stores |
|
|
|
|
WA Limestone Contracting Pty Ltd |
$5,435.32 |
|
|
|
Quinns Beach Groyne 1 Maintenance & Upgrade Works - Assets |
|
|
|
|
WA Ropes & Hardware |
$261.91 |
|
|
|
Nylon Rope - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Business Association Incorporated |
$990.00 |
|
|
|
Workshop Delivery - Save Time And Money In Your Business By Reducing Admin And Paperwork - Economic Development |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Central Bushfire Brigade |
$141.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - PO Box Renewal |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Electric |
$17,000.87 |
|
|
|
Electrical Maintenance For The City |
|
|
|
|
Wanneroo Fire Support Brigade |
$1,206.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - Toner Cartridges |
|
|
|
|
West Coast Turf |
$1,672.00 |
|
|
|
Lay Turf - Hainsworth Park - Parks |
|
|
|
|
Western Resource Recovery Pty Ltd |
$2,891.68 |
|
|
|
Empty Washdown Bay - Workshop - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Servicing Of Grease Trap - Quinns Mindarie Community Centre - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Western Tree Recyclers |
$43,624.72 |
|
|
|
Disposal Of Greenwaste - Waste |
|
|
|
|
Wildflower Society of WA Incorporated |
$3,750.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Northern Suburbs Branch Open Day Event At Lansdale Farm School |
|
|
|
|
Wilson Security |
$1,956.90 |
|
|
|
Security Services For The City - Rangers |
|
|
|
|
Workpower Incorporated |
$341.00 |
|
|
|
Herbicide - Hardcastle - Conservation |
|
|
|
|
Workshed Children's Mosaics |
$5,500.00 |
|
|
|
Conservation Of Public Artwork - Ridgewood Park - Cultural Services |
|
|
|
|
Zetta Group |
$308.00 |
|
|
|
Jira Service Desk Licences - From March 2021 - ICT |
|
|
|
|
Zipform Pty Ltd |
$1,553.14 |
|
|
|
Printing & Issue Of Interim Rates - Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004115 |
27/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,500.00 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$502.64 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$399.09 |
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$459.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004116 |
27/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alinta Gas |
$605.70 |
|
|
|
Gas Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Alita Constructions |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Australian Taxation Office |
$298,681.00 |
|
|
|
Payroll Deductions |
|
|
|
|
BDD Australia Pty Ltd |
$268.35 |
|
|
|
Milk Deliveries For The City |
|
|
|
|
Building & Construction Industry Training Board |
$72,869.07 |
|
|
|
Collection Approved Levy Payments - 01.12.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
|
|
|
|
Celebration Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Cr Christopher Baker |
$401.89 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - 09.02.2021 - 31.03.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Glynis Parker |
$161.13 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance - 01 - 31.03.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Cr Lewis Flood |
$523.97 |
|
|
|
Travel Allowance 01.02.2021 - 31.03.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Dale Alcock Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Department of Fire & Emergency Services |
$920.00 |
|
|
|
False Fire Alarm Attendance - Aquamotion - Building Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage |
$8,650.00 |
|
|
|
Application Accepted By The City - Applicant, Glen Matyear, Matyear Investments Pty Ltd Atf G & A Consulting Trust Reference - DAP/21/01980 Address - 1369 Wanneroo Road Proposal - Single Storey Funeral Home |
|
|
|
|
Department of Primary Industries an Regional Development |
$97.49 |
|
|
|
Animal Pathology Testing - Health Services |
|
|
|
|
Department of Transport |
$1,097.60 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Ownership Search - Community Safety |
|
|
|
|
Halpd Pty Ltd Trading As Affordable Living Homes |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Hoai Khanh Tam Nhu |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Homebuyers Centre |
$8,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 4 Street & Verge Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Mr Michael Duke |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Carol Fletcher |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Emma Butler |
$129.00 |
|
|
|
Reimbursement - First Aid Course 15.04.2021 |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Maureen Dawson |
$1,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Mrs Pauline Crisp |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
Dog Registration Refund - Sterilised |
|
|
|
|
Ms Dawn Ogley |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Ms Mandeep Jhajj |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Ms Paula Nguyen |
$360.00 |
|
|
|
Vehicle Crossing Subsidy |
|
|
|
|
Paywise Pty Ltd |
$94.38 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging - March 2021 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Quinns Men's Shed Incorporated |
$41,675.47 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - Contribution Towards Extension Of Premises - Community Planning & Development |
|
|
|
|
Redink Homes Pty Ltd |
$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Street & Verge Bond |
|
|
|
|
Returned & Services League Quinns Sub Branch |
$5,000.00 |
|
|
|
Community Funding - 2021 Anzac Day Ceremony And Gunfire Breakfast - Quinns Rocks Sports Club |
|
|
|
|
Smartsalary |
$419.22 |
|
|
|
Input Tax Credits For Salary Packaging - March 2021 - Finance |
|
|
|
|
Synergy |
$531,682.82 |
|
|
|
Power Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Tangent Nominees Pty Ltd (Atf The Summit Homes Group Trust) |
$6,300.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - 3 Verge Bond Fees - Duplicate Payments |
|
|
|
|
Thi Tran |
$294.00 |
|
|
|
Refund - Food Business Application & Registration - Withdrawn |
|
|
|
|
Water Corporation |
$13,749.58 |
|
|
|
Water Supplies For The City |
|
|
|
|
Western Power |
$550.00 |
|
|
|
Streetlight Design - Nankivell Way Koondoola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004117 |
29/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Refund |
$1,706.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004118 |
30/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Credit Cards & Bank Fees March 2021 $45,516.17 - Breakdown On Page 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Director Corporate Services Advance - EFTs |
$12,361,798.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANCELLED CHEQUES FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD |
|||
|
121072 |
16.02.2021 |
Australian Gnostic Association Incorporated |
-$540.00 |
|
118613 |
10.12.2019 |
Ellenbrook Football Club |
-$137.50 |
|
118565 |
10.12.2019 |
Catherine Cullinane |
-$30.55 |
|
118516 |
03.12.2019 |
Sara Tawfik |
-$350.00 |
|
118514 |
03.12.2019 |
Joseph Banks Secondary College P & C |
-$850.00 |
|
118466 |
26.11.2019 |
Banksia Grove Development Nominees |
-$850.00 |
|
118686 |
17.12.2019 |
Gypsy Wilson |
-$32.00 |
|
118655 |
17.12.2019 |
Sonja Holley |
-$1.25 |
|
118707 |
18.12.2019 |
A & S Butcher |
-$3,190.00 |
|
118621 |
10.12.2019 |
Louisa Jane Holdings Pty Ltd |
-$330.00 |
|
118687 |
17.12.2019 |
June Reith |
-$10.00 |
|
118677 |
17.12.2019 |
Russell McCarthy |
-$100.00 |
|
118672 |
17.12.2019 |
Tayla Charlton |
-$100.00 |
|
118647 |
17.12.2019 |
Sunaina Dhanjal |
-$100.00 |
|
118420 |
19.11.2019 |
Anthony Poidinger |
-$50.00 |
|
118596 |
10.12.2019 |
Estate of Late Gwenyth Layton |
-$494.00 |
|
4084-12921 |
22.03.2021 |
Department of Communities |
-$350,546.35 |
|
121224 |
23.03.2021 |
Mr Spyros Spyrou |
-$2,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
-$359,711.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANUAL JOURNAL |
|||
|
12461/2021 |
30.04.2021 |
Lodgement 07.04.21 25 Unpaid Infringements |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$1,925.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Town Planning Scheme |
|||
|
|
|
Cell 4 |
|
|
|
|
Castledine Gregory - 185 Mary St Wanneroo |
$23,354.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 5 |
|
|
|
|
McLeods - Legal Fees |
$2,275.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell 8 |
|
|
|
|
McLeods - Legal Fees |
$4,725.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$30,354.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL FUND BANK ACCOUNT |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06.04.2021 |
$1,761,491.29 |
|
|
|
06.04.2021 |
$25,033.25 |
|
|
|
06.04.2021 |
$15,978.01 |
|
|
|
07.04.2021 |
$251.46 |
|
|
|
08.04.2021 |
$200.00 |
|
|
|
08.04.2021 |
$71.22 |
|
|
|
20.04.2021 |
$1,797,592.93 |
|
|
|
20.04.2021 |
$25,264.28 |
|
|
|
20.04.2021 |
$317.66 |
|
|
|
20.04.2021 |
$3,251.80 |
|
|
|
23.04.2021 |
$1,528.89 |
|
|
|
23.04.2021 |
$603,966.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$4,234,947.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
00004118 |
30/04/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Wanneroo - Municipal Bank Account |
|
|
|
|
Bank Fees March 2021 |
|
|
|
|
GLF Trans Fee |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
CBA Merchant Fee |
$20,390.20 |
|
|
|
BPay Fee Debtors |
$47.52 |
|
|
|
BPay Fee Ungerboeck |
$48.05 |
|
|
|
BPay Fee Rates |
$14,358.44 |
|
|
|
BPoint Debtors |
$2.31 |
|
|
|
BPoint Rates |
$573.73 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$260.00 |
|
|
|
Commbiz Fee |
$215.14 |
|
|
|
Account Service Fee |
$244.10 |
|
|
|
Payroll Return Fees |
$2.50 |
|
|
|
Payroll Return Fees |
$5.00 |
|
|
|
Aust Post Dishonour Fee |
$15.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$36,211.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Cards March 2021 |
|
|
|
|
M Dickson |
|
|
|
|
Pullman Bunker bay - Accommodation for UDIA WA Annual Conference |
$478.00 |
|
|
|
Cafe 48 - UDIA WA Conference - food |
$23.94 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$13.13 |
|
|
|
Pointsbuild Pty Ltd - Training - Designing in Bushfire Prone Areas |
$55.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Singh |
|
|
|
|
Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia - Registration Fee - IPWEA 2021 State Conference |
$2,283.75 |
|
|
|
Western Power - Western Power - Installation of Street Light - Butterick Place Girrawheen |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
Western Power - Western Power - Installation of Street Light - Hurlston Way Koondoola |
$497.92 |
|
|
|
JB HiFi - Samsung Wireless Phone Charger |
$79.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Jennings |
|
|
|
|
NTAA (National TAX Accountants Association) - Workshop - Crown Perth 21.04.2021 - 1 Attendee |
$669.00 |
|
|
|
Local Government Managers Australia - Finance Professionals Conference 2021 - 3 Attendees |
$3,360.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Yildiz |
|
|
|
|
Law Of CPD WA - Compliance Training Points For Executive Managers Annual Practising Requirements |
$879.00 |
|
|
|
Parking Fees |
$22.55 |
|
|
|
ASIC - Company search |
$9.00 |
|
|
|
Ergolink - Ergonomic Mouse |
$172.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Smart |
|
|
|
|
Mailchimp - Monthly Subscription Fee |
$13.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Simms |
|
|
|
|
Thi Nguyen - Business Hospitality |
$71.70 |
|
|
|
Mummas - Business Hospitality |
$16.50 |
|
|
|
Qantas Airways - Airfare - ALGA National Assembly 20.06.2021 |
$162.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$9,304.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bank Fees And Credit Cards |
$45,516.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoup to Director Corporate Services Advance A/C |
$12,352,091.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Payments Total (Includes Payroll, Advance Recoup, Credit Cards And Bank Fees) |
$16,632,555.48 |
At the close of April 2021 outstanding creditors amounted to $1,562,223.95.
Consultation
Nil
Comment
The list of payment (cheques and electronic transfers) and the end of month total of outstanding creditors for the month of April 2021 is presented to the Council for information and recording in the minutes of the meeting, as required by the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
Statutory Compliance
Regulation 13(1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 requires a local government to list the accounts paid each month and total all outstanding creditors at the month end and present such information to the Council at its next Ordinary Meeting after each preparation. A further requirement of this Section is that the prepared list must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.3 Progressive Organisation
4.3.2 Ensure excellence in our customer service”
Risk Management Considerations
“There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.”
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That in accordance with Regulation 13 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, Council RECEIVES the list of payments drawn for the month of April 2021, as detailed in this report.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 303
File Ref: 5115 – 21/222222
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 3
Issue
To review the City’s Accounting Policy.
Background
The City's current Accounting Policy (the Policy) was adopted by Council in May 2020. The contents of this Policy include the significant accounting Policies, which are required to be administrated and thoroughly monitored for compliance and accountability. Of utmost importance, is that the significant accounting Policies will be incorporated as ‘Notes’ to both the Audited Annual Financial Statements and Annual Budget, which will be available to the general public for usage and viewing.
Detail
The purpose of the Policy is to provide a framework to ensure all City accounts are reported to Council with consistent application of the Australian Accounting Standards and in compliance with statutory requirements under the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) and Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (the Regulations).
The Policy contains a set of specific policies known as ‘Summary of Significant Accounting Policies’ to be applied in the preparation of the City’s Annual Financial Statements. These include methods, measurement systems and procedures for presenting disclosures as required by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements requires the City to use the summary of significant accounting policies to disclose how the City prepared its Annual Financial Statements in order to assist users in making informed decisions.
Consultation
Comments from the City’s external Auditors, the Office of Auditor General and Grant Thornton, for the Financial Statement 2019/20 have been considered in the production of this Policy. Relevant internal stakeholders have also been consulted. The draft Accounting Policy has been presented to the Audit & Risk Committee on 25 May 2021 and considered proposed recommendations.
Comment
The following extract from the Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference relates to the Committee’s role in reviewing the Statutory Accounts:
"To review the report prepared by the CEO on any actions taken in respect of any matters raised in the report of the auditor and presenting the report to Council for adoption prior to the end of the next financial year or six months after the last report prepared by the auditor is received, whichever is the latest in time.
To review the local government’s draft annual financial report, focusing on:
· Accounting policies and practices;
· Changes to accounting policies and practices;
· The process used in making significant accounting estimates;
· Significant adjustments to the financial report (if any) arising from the audit process;
· Compliance with accounting standards and other reporting requirements; and
· Significant variances from prior years.
To consider and recommend adoption of the annual financial report to Council, and to review any significant changes that may arise subsequent to any such recommendation but before the annual financial report is signed."
Money Paid in Lieu of Public Open Space
Section 154 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 was amended on 20 July 2020. Prior to 20 July 2020 all money received by a local government under section 153 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 was to be paid into a separate account of the “trust fund” of the local government established under the section 6.9 of the Act. The amendment requires all money received to be paid into a separate “Public Open Space Reserve” of the local government established under the section 6.9 of the Act. The Public Open Space Reserve creation will take place along with the 2021/22 Annual Budget adoption.
The revised Accounting Policy showing tracked changes can be found in Attachment 2.
Following the Audit & Risk Committee meeting, further required changes were identified and the following has been added to the Accounting Policy:
AASB 1059 Service Concession Arrangements: Grantors
The City has adopted recent changes in the Australian Accounting Standards AASB 1059 effective from 1 July 2020. The City has assessed the impact of AASB 1059, and concluded that there will be no impact.
AASB 2018-7 Definition of Materiality
The City has adopted the amendment to AASB 2018-7 which will be consistently applied to future periods. The amendment includes additional explanation to expand the definition of what information may be considered material in nature and how presentation may also be an influence.
Section 44 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996
Section 44 of the Regulations was amended to include the remuneration for “each person” separately instead of the total amount paid to council members.
Statutory Compliance
The Policy complies with the City accounting requirements as detailed in:
· The Act;
· Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996; and
· AASB Standards.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
Financial Management |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance |
Manage |
“The above risk/s relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic and Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.”
In pursuing growth under the Economic objectives of the existing Strategic Community Plan, Council should consider the following risk appetite statements:
“Local Jobs
The City is prepared to accept a high level of financial risk provided that the City implements a risk management strategy to manage any risk exposure.
Strategic Growth
The City will accept a moderate level of financial risk for facilitating industry development and growth.
Any strategic objective including ongoing planning, funding and capital investment to develop infrastructure strategic assets carries financial risks.”
Policy Implications
If adopted by Council, the revised Policy will form the major part of Note 1 of the City Annual Financial Report and will supersede the current Policy.
Financial Implications
Adoption of the Policy will ensure consistent application of accounting principles and treatments to aid comparative analysis for decision making.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the proposed revised Accounting Policy as shown in Attachment 3 as recommended by the Audit & Risk Committee.
Attachments:
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Accounting Policy - current version |
17/34812[v4] |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Accounting Policy - revised version with track changes |
21/200428 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - Accounting Policy - revised version |
17/34812[v5] |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 344
Property Services
File Ref: 3633V03 – 21/221472
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To consider the permanent closure of portions of unnamed and unconstructed road reserve in the Pinjar region.
Background
The DPLH contacted the City in relation to several unnamed and unconstructed road reserves throughout the Pinjar region (Attachment 1 refers).
The City receive a request from the DPLH as the landowner of the unnamed and unconstructed road reserves, requesting the road reserves be permanently closed.
Detail
The eight road reserves in question run parallel and perpendicular to Old Yanchep Road, Pinjar. The section of road reserves that the DPLH wishes to close permanently are delineated in red (Attachment 1 refers).
The road reserves are currently zoned either Conservation (Bush Forever) or Parks and Recreation. The DPLH believe the road reserves were used in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s for stock routes from Old Yanchep Road and have subsequently become redundant. The closing of these road reserves will formalise management of the land and support the protection of the water mound and conservation area. The road reserves will be amalgamated with the adjoining lots.
Consultation
In accordance with Section 58 of the LAA a local government must not resolve to make a request under subsection (1) until a period of 35 days has elapsed from the publication of the proposed closure in a newspaper circulating in its district and the local government has considered any objections made within that period.
Initial consultation was carried out in May 2020 by way of letters to relevant government agencies. The City received five responses from servicing authorities and government agencies (including Western Power, ATCO Gas, Water Corporation, Telstra and DPLH). No objections or concerns were raised. Attachment 2 provides a summary of the responses received.
Initial consultation was also carried out with relevant internal service units within the City, with no objection to the closure of the road reserve.
Subject to Council’s support, the formal Public Consultation period prescribed in Section 58 of the LAA will commence via newspaper advertisements and on the City’s website for a period of 35 days.
Comment
The unconstructed portions of the road reserve do not currently provide any benefit to property access or traffic flow, and will not provide any such benefit in the future due to the zonings. The road reserves are therefore considered by Administration to be redundant.
Administration supports the request of the DPLH to permanently close the unnamed and unconstructed reserves as per Attachment 1, which will ensure the protection of the water mound and conservation area.
Statutory Compliance
The City must comply with section 58 of the LAA and regulation 9 of the Land Administration Regulations 1998, dealing with public advertising, objections and service agency responses to the proposed road closure and must formally resolve to ‘close the road’, prior to advising the DPLH and requesting the Minister of Lands to consider the closure.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.1 Working with Others
4.1.1 Build effective partnerships and demonstrate leadership in local government at regional, state and national levels”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Land disposal will be managed in accordance with the City’s Strategic Land Use Policy.
Financial Implications
The DPLH will be responsible for all costs related to purchase of the subject road reserve including advertising.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. SUPPORTS the closure of the portions of the unnamed and unconstructed road reserve in the Pinjar region as shown on Attachment 1 (subject to survey);
2. AUTHORISES Administration to commence public consultation as prescribed by Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997;
3. NOTES that if submissions are received a further report will be presented to Council; and
4. If no submissions are received from the public consultation, pursuant to Section 58 of the Land Administration Act 1997 AUTHORISES a request be made to the Minister for Lands for the permanent closure of the unnamed and unconstructed road reserve portions in the Pinjar region.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Map Location |
21/221471 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Response from Consultation |
21/221996 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 353
Council & Corporate Support
File Ref: 2855V03 – 21/188468
Responsible Officer: Manager Council & Corporate Support
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider requests for donations and youth sponsorships in accordance with the City’s Donations and Youth Sponsorships Policy (Policy).
Background
The Policy requires applications over $500.00 from individuals and organisations to be determined by Council. Consequently, a report is prepared for Council meetings, coinciding with a period where applications of this nature have been received.
With respect to requests for sponsorships, the Policy specifies that for National Events the amount provided will be $200.00 per individual, capped at $600.00 per team, and for International Events the amount provided is $500.00 per individual capped at $1,500.00 per team. Schools are capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Detail
During this period, the City has received four sponsorship requests and one community donation request, which are summarised as follows. Copies of the full applications are available from Administration upon request.
Comment
Sponsorship Donations
|
Applicant 1 – High Flyers Trampoline and Gymnastics Academy – HPE 21/180910 |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
National Level 7 Female Tumbling – Chloe Gillespie
Youth International Under 15 Female Double Mini Trampoline, Youth International Under 15 Tumbling, WA International Double Mini Trampoline and WA International Tumbling Team – Molly Van Roon
Youth International Under 13 Male Trampoline, Youth International Under 13 Male Double Mini Trampoline and WA International Trampoline Team – Ellis Scanlon
Youth International Under 15 Male Trampoline – Jayden Friend |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18 years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
Australian Gymnastics Championships, Carrara, QLD 12 – 17 May 2021 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200.00 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the Policy, $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to High Flyers Trampoline and Gymnastics Academy for the participation of Chloe Gillespie, Molly Van Roon, Ellis Scanlon and Jayden Friend at the Australian Gymnastics Championships being held in Carrara, QLD from 12 – 17 May 2021 |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy |
|
Applicant 2 – Wanneroo Giants Charter Junior League Team - HPE 21/190361 |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Lucas Santich, Tom Hewett, Bailey Thompson, Rhys Hards, Nikora Bryan, Owen Capes and Dean Lovett |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18 years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2021 Australian Junior League Baseball Championships West Beach, SA 16-20 May 2021 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200.00 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the Policy, $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Junior League Team for the participation of Lucas Santich, Tom Hewett, Bailey Thompson, Rhys Hards, Nikora Bryan, Owen Capes and Dean Lovett at the 2021 Australian Junior League Baseball Championships to be held in West Beach, SA from 16-20 May 2021 |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy |
|
Applicant 3 – Wanneroo Giants Charter Intermediate League Team - HPE 21/190361 |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Cameron Bahr, Rhien Bridges, Tristan Clark, Raf Diblasi, Oliver Newham, Chase Shortland and Anneliese Wood |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18 years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2021 Australian Intermediate League Baseball Championships Mildura, Vic 25-29 May 2021 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200.00 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the Policy, $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Intermediate League Team for the participation of Cameron Bahr, Rhien Bridges, Tristan Clark, Raf Diblasi, Oliver Newham, Chase Shortland and Anneliese Wood at the 2021 Australian Intermediate League Baseball Championships to be held in Mildura, Vic from 25-29 May 2021 |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy |
|
Applicant 4 – Wanneroo Giants Charter Senior League Team - HPE 21/190361 |
|
|
Name of Individual/s
|
Jacob Santich, Dawson George, Rhys Kelly, Cooper Sherwood and Patrick Anderson |
|
Reside in City of Wanneroo 18 years of age or under |
Yes Yes |
|
Event Details |
2021 Australian Senior League Baseball Championships Lismore, NSW 8-12 May 2021 |
|
Commitment to providing a written report regarding the event |
Yes |
|
Commitment to acknowledgement of the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Eligibility Level |
National ($200.00 each) |
|
Comments
|
As per the Policy, $200.00 per individual (capped at $600.00 per team to a maximum of four teams per event) |
|
Recommendation
|
APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Senior League Team for the participation of Jacob Santich, Dawson George, Rhys Kelly, Cooper Sherwood and Patrick Anderson at the 2021 Australian Senior League Baseball Championships to be held in Lismore, NSW from 8-12 May 2021 |
|
|
This request is in accordance with Council’s Policy |
Community Group Donations
|
Applicant 5 – Hudson Park Primary School, Girrawheen HPE 21/186682 |
|
|
Request amount |
$1,000.00 |
|
Description of request |
Request a donation for the purchase of six poles and the services of an artist to paint the six aboriginal seasons on the poles with the project commencing on 30 June 2021, at Hudson Park Primary School |
|
Criteria |
Evaluation |
|
Potential for income generation |
Nil |
|
Status of applicant organisation |
School |
|
Exclusivity of the event or project |
Hudson Park Primary School students and Faculty |
Alignment with Council’s existing philosophies, values and strategic direction |
Strategic Implications: “1 Society 1.3 Distinctive Places 1.3.1 Create distinctive places based on identity of areas” |
|
Alternative funding sources available or accessed by the organisation |
Nil |
|
Contribution to the event or activity made by the applicant or organisation |
$1,000.00 |
|
Previous funding assistance provided to the organisation by the City |
Nil |
|
Commitment to acknowledge the City of Wanneroo |
Yes |
|
Comments |
Hudson Park Primary School request for a donation is not supported as the application does not meet criteria or intent of the Donations and Youth Sponsorship Policy as follows:
Clause 4.1 Community Group Donations are available for ‘not-for-profit or non-government organisations that have a charitable or community service oriented purpose”. This application is from a government education agency.
Scope: The application does not demonstrate benefit to the wider City of Wanneroo community through either the: · level of Public awareness of the activity or project attendance; or · Public attendance at events held; or · Involvement of volunteers
Exclusions: Council will not consider funding applications for donations and youth sponsorships for: 2.10 State or Federal government organisations (unless substantial benefit to the City of Wanneroo community is established) This request is from a government education agency to install the poles direct onto government owned property.
Should this request be approved, it would set a precedence of providing donations directly to state government education agencies and it is considered appropriate that such an installation be funded by and through the financial assistance of the state government. Therefore it is recommended that this request is not approved. |
|
Recommendation |
NOT APPROVE a donation in the sum of $1,000.00 to Hudson Park Primary School, Girrawheen for the purchase of six poles and the services of an artist to paint the six aboriginal seasons on the poles with the project commencing on 30 June 2021, at Hudson Park Primary School |
|
Reason |
This request is not in accordance with Council’s Policy |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“1 Society
1.1 Healthy and Active People
1.1.1 Create opportunities that encourage community wellbeing and active and healthy lifestyles”
“1 Society
1.3 Distinctive Places
1.3.1 Create distinctive places based on identity of areas”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
The Policy states that sponsorship applications for attendance at National Events will be capped at $600.00 per team (up to four teams) and Regional or State capped at $600.00 per club. International events will be capped at $1,500.00 per team and schools capped at $2,000.00 per school per financial year.
Financial Implications
|
Budget 2020/2021 |
|
$110, 000.00 |
|
Amount expended to date (as at 17 May 2021) |
|
$20,200.00 |
|
Balance |
|
$89,800.00 |
|
Total of requests for this round: Donations ($3,400.00):
Total this Round (recommended) |
$2,400.00 |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
$87,400.00 |
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to High Flyers Trampoline and Gymnastics Academy for the participation of Chloe Gillespie, Molly Van Roon, Ellis Scanlon and Jayden Friend at the Australian Gymnastics Championships to be held in Carrara, QLD from 12–17 May 2021;
2. APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Junior League Team for the participation of Lucas Santich, Tom Hewett, Bailey Thompson, Rhys Hards, Nikora Bryan, Owen Capes and Dean Lovett at the 2021 Australian Junior League Baseball Championships to be held in West Beach, SA from 16-20 May 2021;
3. APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Intermediate League Team for the participation of Cameron Bahr, Rhien Bridges, Tristan Clark, Raf Diblasi, Oliver Newham, Chase Shortland and Anneliese Wood at the 2021 Australian Intermediate League Baseball Championships to be held in Mildura, Vic from 25-29 May 2021;
4. APPROVE a request for sponsorship in the sum of $600.00 to Wanneroo Giants Charter Senior League Team for the participation of Jacob Santich, Dawson George, Rhys Kelly, Cooper Sherwood and Patrick Anderson at the 2021 Australian Senior League Baseball Championships to be held in Lismore, NSW from 8-12 May 2021; and
5. NOT APPROVE a donation in the sum of $1,000.00 to Hudson Park Primary School, Girrawheen for the purchase of 6 poles and an Artist to paint the poles for the Aboriginal Message Sticks for the 6 Seasons project commencing on 30 June 2021, at Hudson Park Primary School.
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 357
Chief Executive Office
Advocacy & Economic Development
File Ref: 28620 – 21/200187
Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 2
Issue
To seek Council approval to lodge the Lot 9100 subdivision with the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for approval.
Background
In August 2020 (CEO3-08/20), Council unanimously supported the development of the subdivision engineering design for Lot 9100 in the Neerabup Industrial Area (NIA). The August 2020 report included concept designs for the proposed subdivision to indicate the likely layout of lots on the site. The concept plans were presented to Council Forums on 24 March and 9 June 2020. The June 9 Council Forum in particular provided the opportunity for Council Members to ask questions and seek clarification regarding the concept plan for the subdivision of Lot 9100.
In order for the engineering design for Lot 9100 to be completed and for the site to become development ready, it is important for the City to obtain WAPC approval for the subdivision.
Detail
Following Council support to continue with the development of the engineering design for Lot 9100 the preliminary engineering design was commenced by Wave International and Taylor Burrell Barnett (TBB) were engaged for the development of the subdivision management plans and applications for Lot 9100. TBB has now produced the Plan of Subdivision Lot 9100, Mather Drive, Neerabup (Attachment 1) and has completed the planning application package to be lodged with the WAPC. To provide additional context and background to the development of the Plan of Subdivision, the previous concept plans for Lot 9100 are shown at Attachment 2.
It should be noted that the subdivision is likely to be undertaken in two stages with the northern section to be the second stage. If demand for the lots is higher than expected, the development can be delivered in a single stage.
The northern section of the subdivision plan indicates two temporary cul-de-sacs that have been included for the subdivision application but ultimately there will be a road (Road 5) connecting to Mather drive and removing the need for the cul-de-sacs. Road 5 has not been included for the current subdivision application due to Development WA being unable to provide support in the short term due to their Lot 2001 being subject to environmental assessment. This means that a commitment to sharing the road cannot be made by Development WA at the current time but this commitment is expected to be made in the near future.
The general order of works required to progress Lot 9100 through to development stage is indicated below.
Lot 9100 Subdivision Progress and Schedule of Work Activities
1. 2015 – Lot 9100 concept plan adopted by Council (complete);
2. 2020 – Lot 9100 final concept plan developed (complete);
3. 2021 – Lot 9100 final concept plan presented to Council and the development of the subdivision engineering design for Lot 9100 supported (complete);
4. 2021 – Lot 9100 preliminary engineering design commenced (complete);
5. 2021 – Lot 9100 subdivision management plans and application package completed ready to be lodged with the WAPC (complete);
6. 2021 – Council support to lodge Lot 9100 subdivision application with the Western Australia Planning Commission (pending);
7. 2021 – Approval from the Western Australia Planning Commission (valid for 5 years) (approximately September 2021);
8. 2021 – Expression of Interest process calling for interested businesses to locate at the development ready Lot 9100 under a leasehold model (approximately September 2021);
9. 2021 – Complete the Pre-Calculation plan;
10. 2022 – Complete Lot 9100 Subdivision engineering design and business plan;
11. 2023 – Subdivision implementation including:
a) supplementary planning reports,
b) business plan advertising,
c) project documentation,
d) tender documentation and assessment process,
e) contract award; and
f) subdivision construction commencement.
It is proposed that all works up to subdivision implementation (up to and including activity 10 above) will be undertaken consistent with Council’s previous decision. Prior to any subdivision works taking place on Lot 9100 (activity 11), Administration will prepare appropriate detailed financial projections, a business plan and tender documentation for Council to consider for approval.
It should also be noted that subdivision applications to the WAPC often inform the wider planning of infrastructure by agencies such as the Water Corporation. The submission of a subdivision application to the WAPC will also provide a signal to the market that the City is advancing the project towards development stage. In alignment with this, it is proposed that the EOI process calling for interested businesses to locate at the development ready Lot 9100 under a leasehold model be timed to coincide with subdivision approval.
Consultation
The consultation undertaken on the project has been delivered through the Neerabup Industrial Area Working Group, Council Forums and Council meetings. Administration also meets regularly with Development WA to share information as appropriate to ensure the NIA develops in a timely manner.
Comment
The City’s landholding at Neerabup is a key asset that has the potential to provide a significant long-term revenue stream to the City as well as significant regional economic benefits.
Finalising the Lot 9100 Detailed Design and going to market seeking EOIs for businesses to locate to the land under a leasehold model will provide the City with critical information to make a decision on which development scenario will provide the best return and outcome for the City. This will enable an appropriate Business Plan to be developed for consideration by Council
The next stage in the process of enabling the project to become development ready is to lodge the Lot 9100 subdivision application with the WAPC.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995 (LGA) sets out the steps required for commercial enterprises by local governments and Section 10 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 sets out the requirements for a business plan for a major trading undertaking.
As required by Section 3.59 of the LGA, local governments undertaking commercial enterprises are required to:
1. Prepare a business plan;
2. Undertake local and state wide advertising of the business plan; and
3. Consider any submissions received.
Administration will develop a business plan for the development of the City’s landholdings at Neerabup in accordance with the LGA for advertising at the appropriate time.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“2 Economy
2.2 Strategic Growth
2.2.6 Focus on industry development in key strategic areas such as Neerabup”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-S12 Economic Growth |
Moderate |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Manage |
The above risk relating to the issue contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.
This proposal aligns with the Economy objective of the existing Strategic Community Plan. Council should therefore consider the following risk appetite statement: 2.1 Local jobs
The City’s defined risk appetite for 2.1 Local Jobs is articulated through the risk appetite statement that refers to the development of “strong economic hubs for growth and employment within the region” including Neerabup. The City’s risk appetite statement concludes that “the City is prepared to accept a high level of financial risk provided that the City implements a risk management strategy to manage any risk exposure.”
Policy Implications
The Elected Members are to be aware of the requirement to operate in alignment with the City’s Strategic Land Policy.
Financial Implications
The financial implications for this project are significant. The financial modelling carried out shows that while costs of development are significant, the potential for revenue to the City is also significant with a high project Internal Rate of Return expected.
It should be noted that the ability to develop the City’s landholdings will be subject to available funding determined through the Long Term Financial Plan and annual budgeting process, in the context of the current constrained financial environment. Further detail on the financial implications will be outlined in future detailed financial projections as well as the business plan.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council APPROVES lodgement of the Lot 9100 subdivision application with the Western Australian Planning Commission for approval as detailed in Attachment 1.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Plan of Subdivision - Freehold - Lot 9100, Mather Drive, Neerabup |
21/12117[v3] |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Lot 9100 Concept Designs - Neerabup Industrial Area |
20/199880 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 365
Governance & Legal
File Ref: 2286V02 – 21/221778
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: Nil
Issue
To consider the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee to adopt the City’s updated Strategic Risk profile as recommended by the Audit and Risk Committee on Tuesday 25 May 2021.
Background
A Strategic Risk Register Review Workshop for the Executive was held on 25 March 2021.
As a result of the discussion, the risks and inputs identified during the Strategic Risk Review Workshop, the Strategic Risk Register was presented to the Audit and Risk Committee on 25 May 2021 for consideration. The Audit and Risk Committee recommends Council endorse the City’s Strategic risk profile.
Detail
The Strategic Risk Register workshop resulted in robust discussion around the City’s Risk Management Framework, review of the City’s Strategic Risks, the positives and challenges the City had experienced in the past year from a COVID-19 financial and operational perspective with consideration against the City’s vision, mission, goals and objectives.
Discussions around the external and internal environment and the current economic climate together with issues and risk associated with COVID-19 identified some of the greatest impacts/opportunities presented to Council. As such a risk at the Corporate Risk level CO-O20 Productive Communities has been elevated to Strategic Risk level – ST-S26 Resilient and Productive Communities. The risk description of ST-S26 Resilient and Productive Communities is - Lack of planning to deliver healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities impacts on the ability of the Community to have productive lives and (respond) recover from adversity.
Consultation
The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the City’s Strategic Risk Register biannually.
Comment
The updated details of the City’s Strategic Risk Profile are set out in the below and was presented to the Audit and Risk Committee on 25 May 2021 for consideration. The Audit and Risk Committee has recommended for Council to endorse the City’s Strategic risk profile.
Strategic Risks
|
Risk Title |
Risk Description |
Risk Rating |
|
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Planning |
Ineffectiveness in long term financial planning leads to poor financial management including efficiency and timing of service and asset provision impacting the City's sustainability |
Low |
|
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning |
Infrastructure is not delivered in a timely and coordinated way leading to issues with access and service levels and/or additional expenses (Not City of Wanneroo infrastructure) |
Low |
|
ST-S05 Water Availability |
Ineffective City preparedness for potential reduced water availability impacts business and community service delivery |
Moderate |
|
ST-S06 Climate Change |
Lack of preparedness to respond and adapt to climate change impacts leading to community and financial implications |
Moderate |
|
ST-S12 Economic Growth |
Ineffective economic development intervention results in limited opportunity to create local employment opportunities impacting on the City's vision to create sustainable communities |
Moderate |
|
ST-S20 Strategic Community Plan |
Inadequate strategic community planning results in misaligned strategies between the City and the Community |
Low |
|
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships |
Ineffective engagement with stakeholders leads to, lost opportunities and negatively impacts on the quality of the relationship |
Low |
|
ST-S24 Strategic Asset Management |
Inadequate asset management processes and systems impacts on the City's ability to manage assets strategically |
Moderate |
|
ST-S25 Legislative Reform or Changes |
Lack of preparedness to accommodate Legislative reform changes impacts on the City's ability to deliver the CBP, stakeholder commitments and operational effectiveness requires diversion of resources from current priorities and activities |
Moderate |
|
New Strategic Risk |
||
|
ST-S26 Resilient and Productive Communities |
Lack of planning to deliver healthy, safe, vibrant and connected communities impacts on the ability of the Community to have productive lives and (respond) recover from adversity |
Moderate |
Statutory Compliance
Nil
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-O17 Risk Management |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance and Legal |
Manage |
The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems. Alignment with the following risk appetite statement, under the strategic theme of Civic Leadership should also be considered:
4.2 Good Governance
The City places a high priority on the importance of maintaining good governance and has no appetite for deliberate act or omission by any party that jeopardises this. The City provides appropriate systems and processes to realise its values and achieve good governance. Decisions are aligned to policy to ensure non-compliance impacts are reduced as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and reputational damage is restricted to low. Therefore the City accepts low or ALARP of compliance and governance risk.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee and ENDORSES the updated City of Wanneroo Strategic Risk Profile.
Attachments: Nil
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 370
File Ref: 9167V06 – 21/204054
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Issue
To consider amendments to the City’s Delegated Authority Register (the Register) as a result of the annual review required under the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act).
Background
Sections 5.18 and 5.46(2) of the Act require that the City’s delegated statutory authorities are reviewed at least once each financial year by the delegator (Council and the CEO). The last annual review of the Register was undertaken in June 2020.
Detail
To satisfy the legislative requirement to undertake an annual review, Governance, in conjunction with delegated officers and the Executive, undertook to review: -
· relevant legislation to ensure the delegation remains current and compliant;
· drafting of delegation instrument to ensure clarity of intent and execution;
· whether the delegation and sub-delegation are to the appropriate officer level;
· whether there is a requirement for new delegations to improve efficiencies and subject to satisfactory documented guidance for consistent decision making;
· one off delegations granted by Council to ascertain whether they are still required;
· policies or procedures that support the delegation; and
· delegation instruments against the WALGA model templates delegation instruments.
Consultation
There was no consultation with external parties in relation to the content of this report.
Comment
The table below summarises the outcomes and recommendations resulting from the review. The proposed amendments that relate to a Council decision are noted in the fourth column. A marked-up version of the proposed changes to the Register are shown at (Attachment 1).
The table does not detail the administrative amendments proposed as these do not impact on the intent of the delegation. These changes relate to:
· removing superfluous information;
· providing further clarification of the function being delegated;
· update of compliance links; and
· update of legislative references.
|
Del. No. |
Title |
Proposed Change |
Council / CEO decision or Administrative |
|
1.1.2 |
Performing Functions Outside the District |
Added condition on Council’s Conditions on Delegation: - “A decision to undertake a function outside the District can only be made under this delegation where there is a relevant budget allocation and the performance of the functions does not negatively impact service levels within the District. Where these conditions are not met the matter must be referred for Council Decision.” This change is based on the WALGA Model of Delegations. |
Council |
|
1.1.3 |
Compensation for Damage Incurred when Performing Functions |
· Addition to Council’s Conditions on Delegation: - “Delegation is limited to settlements which do not exceed $20,000”. · There is a statutory power to sub-delegate that has not been extended. · The Record Keeping Statement has been expanded to include that Council Members will be notified of decisions made through the Council Members Hub. |
Council |
|
1.1.5 |
Powers of Entry |
Removal of Manager Asset Planning as a sub-delegate. This Manager has not exercised the delegation and does not believe any benefit will be gained by maintaining the position as a sub-delegate. |
CEO |
|
1.1.26 |
Agreement as to Payment of Rates and Service Charges |
· Improved wording of this delegation proposed to provide greater clarity to those making the decisions under this delegation. These changes do not provide greater decision making authority other than those already extended by Council. · Addition of Manager Finance and Coordinator Rates and Accounts as Sub-delegates. |
Council and CEO |
|
1.1.33 |
Grant of Concession on Council Rates |
Improved wording of this delegation proposed to provide greater clarity to those making the decisions under this delegation. These changes do not provide greater decision making authority other than those already extended by Council. |
Council |
2.1.7 |
Building Regulations 2012 – Appointment of Authorised Officers – Infringement Notices |
· An amendment to this instrument is proposed to reflect that legislation provides for a power of delegation from the Council to the CEO. · The proposed change provides for a delegation to the CEO to appoint authorised officers for issuing infringement notices under the Building Regulations 2012. · This change reflects the instrument presented in the WALGA Model of Delegations. |
Council |
|
2.1.8 |
Building Regulations 2012 – Appointment of Approved Officer – Infringement Notices |
· An amendment to this instrument is proposed to reflect that legislation provides for a power of delegation from Council to the CEO. · The proposed change provides for a delegation to the CEO to appoint approved officers for the withdrawal of infringements or an extension of time to pay infringements under the Building Regulations 2012. · This change reflects the instrument presented in the WALGA Model of Delegations. |
Council |
|
2.9.1 |
Strata Titles Act 1985 - Certificate of Approval |
· Title changed to ‘Strata Titles Act 1985 – Approvals’ to reflect the change in legislation. · Addition of two functions as per the change in delegation by the WAPC: 2) Power to determine applications under section 21 of the Strata Titles Act 1985; 3) Power to determine applications under section 22 of the Strata Titles Act 1985. · Update to the Statutory Power of Delegation to reflect the delegation from the WAPC. · Addition of Coordinator Planning Services and Senior Planners as Delegated Officers under the delegation. |
Council / CEO |
|
2.10.1 |
Structure Planning |
· Addition to the title to more accurately reflect the legislation and the function delegated. · Applicants seeking to amend a local development plan can no longer request Council to determine the application. · The proposed amendments are consistent with Council’s request for Administration to consider modifying the delegation to approve modifications to the Jindee Design Codes with the power to sub-delegate this function. Council will still be advised of amendments as per current practice. · There are also changes as a result of amendments to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015 following gazettal of Planning Regulations Amendment Regulations 2020, some of which came into effect on the 15 February 2021. These include the removal of legislative references that no longer exist within the regulations and the removal of the term ‘activity centre plan’. |
Council |
|
2.10.3 |
Development Control |
· Change of title to more accurately reflect the legislation and the function delegated. · The proposed changes to the delegation are to ensure efficiencies in the review of Development Applications. Currently, any application that has an objection needs to be presented to Council for determination. The proposed changes allow for Administration to determine applications even where objections have been received. Council continues to have the ability to review these applications where a written request is submitted by a Council Member. · A condition has been added where Administration will refer applications to Council for determination in certain circumstances. |
Council |
Statutory Compliance
The Act provides for the delegation of certain powers and duties of Council to the CEO who may, (unless prohibited by Council's instrument of delegation or the respective legislation), further on-delegate powers and duties to employees. A power can only be delegated if it exists under legislation, and the legislation allows the delegation to take place.
· Section 5.42 of the Act prescribes that Council may delegate functions or duties to the CEO and Section 5.43 prescribes the limitations on such delegations.
· Section 5.44 of the Act prescribes that the CEO may delegate powers and duties vested in their office and sub-delegate powers and duties delegated to the office of CEO to other local government employees.
All delegations made by Council must be by absolute majority as prescribed by Section 5.42 of the Act. In accordance with Section 59 of the Interpretations Act 1984 and the requirements of Sections 5.16 and 5.42 of the Act, the City is required to record statutory delegated authorities in written instruments of delegation contained in the City’s Register.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
|
Risk Title |
Risk Rating |
|
CO-C01 Compliance Framework |
Low |
|
Accountability |
Action Planning Option |
|
Executive Manager Governance & Legal |
Manage |
The above risk/s relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans through the development of policies and procedures have been developed to accept and manage this risk.
The City’s defined risk appetite for 4.2 Good Governance is articulated through the risk appetite statement as - The City places a high priority on the importance of maintaining good governance and has no appetite for deliberate act or omission by any party that jeopardises this. The City provides appropriate systems and processes to realise its values and achieve good governance. Decisions are aligned to policy to ensure non-compliance impacts are reduced as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) and reputational damage is restricted to low.
Policy Implications
Policies and Procedures will be updated where they are impacted in changes to delegations.
Financial Implications
Nil
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
That Council:-
1. ACCEPTS the review of the City of Wanneroo Delegated Authority Register as required in accordance with sections 5.18 and 5.46(2) of the Local Government Act 1995; and
2. ADOPTS BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY the City’s Delegated Authority Register as shown at Attachment 1 accepting all marked up amendments.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - 2020/21 Annual Review - Proposed Changes to Delegated Authority Register |
21/124595 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 524
File Ref: 30736V04 – 21/181764
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 4
Previous Items: 3.7 - Review of the City of Wanneroo Animals Local Law and amendment to the Bees Local Law - Forum - 03 May 2021 5:30pm (Special)
Issue
To consider:-
(1) adopting a new Animals Local Law 2021 and to repeal the current Animals Local Law 1999; and
(2) an amendment to the Bee Keeping Local Law to correct a drafting anomaly.
Background
The City is continually reviewing its local laws notwithstanding the requirement to undertake a review every eight years in accordance with the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act).
The City’s approach in developing or amending its local laws has been to consider the WALGA Model Template local laws and those widely used by the local government sector in Western Australia, as they relate to the City.
The Animals Local Law was made in August 1999 with several minor amendments enacted since that time as set out in Attachment 1. Of particular note is the removal of provisions relating to the regulation of dogs, cats, bees and fencing following the introduction of relevant legislation and the subsequent making of separate local laws for these matters. The amendments were gazetted according to the local law making process.
Animals Local Law 1999
Apart from the requirement to reformat the local law due to the deletions, a review of the remaining provisions against the WALGA Model Template Local Law and the local laws of the sector highlighted the need to develop a contemporary version encompassing better plain English drafting and provisions not previously covered to ensure the appropriate regulation of animals within the district.
Bee Keeping Local Law 2017
Provisions relating to bees previously covered under Part 6 of the Animals Local Law are now included in a separate Bees Local Law made in January 2017 as set out in Attachment 3. A drafting anomaly has been identified that requires correction.
Detail
Animals Local Law 2021
The purpose of the proposed Animals Local Law is to provide for the regulation, control and management of the keeping of large animals, poultry and pigeons.
A summary of the provisions are as follows:
|
Provision |
Summary of Proposed Amendment |
|
Cats and Dogs |
References to cats and dogs have been removed due to changes in legislation and the subsequent adoption of the Cats Local Law and Dogs Local Law respectively. |
|
Livestock |
These provisions remain largely the same with the exception of references to fencing on property covered by the Dividing Fences Act and the City’s Fencing Local Law. |
|
Horse Exercise Area |
These provisions remain the same but moved to appropriately reflect the part relating to animals. The provisions are now reflected under Part 3 – Animals, subsection 3.5. |
|
Pigeons and Poultry |
Moved to become a new Part that incorporates pigeons as well as poultry. The provisions remain are largely the same except for:- · A Certificate of Registration is still required for the keeping of Pigeons however this certificate will not expire in June each year. The registered pigeon owner will be required to advise the City should any of the conditions of the registration change. · A limitation has been placed on the number of poultry that can be kept according to lot size. · Setbacks on smaller properties have been reduced to allow poultry to be kept on smaller lots but with restrictions on the number to assist in protecting neighbour’s amenity. · Requirements for poultry enclosures are now less prescriptive to allow residents to purchase pre-made chicken coups from retail stores. This will give residents more choice and will allow one or two chickens to be kept in a smaller cage. · Ducks may only be kept on lot sizes greater than 800m2. · The keeping of a rooster, goose, turkey, peafowl remains prohibited in a residential area. · References to ostrich and emu have been moved to Part 3 which deals with the keeping of large animals and continues to preclude them from being kept on any residential, commercial or industrial property. · Specific conditions for keeping poultry are applied based on lot sizes. |
|
Large Animals |
Part 3 provides for the keeping of Large Animals. Provisions are largely the same with the exception of:- · Miniature horse or pig is not specifically referred to however the definition of ‘horse’ includes a miniature horse, which in turn is defined as a ‘large animal’. · The separate section relating to ‘pigs’ has been removed and ‘pigs’ are included under the definition of ‘large animal’. · Reference to “stables” has been removed as conditions relating to this are met through planning provisions relating to setbacks. |
|
Penalties |
The remainder of the local law deals with enforcement provisions, which are also linked to the City’s Penalty Units Local Law 2015. |
The drafting of an amendment local law is overly complex and given the numerous proposed amendments, Administration considers it appropriate to recommend that Council repeal the 1999 Animals Local Law and adopt the new Animals Local Law as set out in Attachment 2.
Bee Keeping Local Law 2021
The drafting anomaly relates to Section 2.1 - Permit required to keep bees. The current drafting of the local law requires a permit for bees to be kept on General Rural, Special Residential, Special Rural, Rural Community, Urban Deferred or Rural Resource zones without being a registered beekeeper, unless required by regulations. The original intent is that beekeepers in these zones should not have to apply for a permit to keep bees but must in all cases be a registered beekeeper.
An amendment is therefore required to state that section 2.1 - subclause 2 refer to subclause (1)(b) rather than subclause (1) in its entirety.
‘Section 2.1 - Permit required to keep bees.
(1) Subject to this clause, a person must not keep bees or allow bees to be kept on land:
(a) unless that person is a registered beekeeper if required by the Regulations; and
(b) in accordance with a valid permit issued in relation to the land.
(2) Subclause (1)(b) does not apply where –
(a) the land is zoned General Rural, Special Residential, Special Rural, Rural Community, Urban Deferred or Rural Resource under a local planning scheme –
……..
The process in accordance with section 3.12 of the Act requires that an ‘amendment local law’ be drafted and adopted to effect this amendment. The Bee Keeping Amendment Local Law 2021 is set out at Attachment 4.
Consultation
Relevant internal stakeholders have been consulted and the local law making process provides members of the public and government departments to have their say on the proposed local law and their relevance within the community.
The local government is to give local public notice stating that the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarised in the notice and provide a copy of the proposed local law at locations specified in the notice. Section 1.7 of the Act states that the notice must be given in at least 3 of the ways prescribed. The notice will be published on the City’s website, on the City’s notice boards at the Civic Centre and all libraries and through the City’s social media.
Submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than six weeks after the notice is given and as soon as the notice is given, is to provide a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister.
Comment
The Council is required to make the local law in accordance with section 3.12 of the Act and approve the giving of State-wide public notice in order to seek public comment.
The agenda and the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting at which the local law is considered is to include the purpose and effect of the proposed local law, which are set out below.
Animals Local Law
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to provide for the regulation, control and management of the keeping of large animals, poultry and pigeons within the City of Wanneroo district.
Effect
The effect of this local law is to establish the requirements with which owners and occupiers of land within the City of Wanneroo district must comply in order to keep domestic animals such as large animals, poultry and pigeons and provides the means of enforcing the local law.
Bees Local Law
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to amend the City of Wanneroo Bees Local Law 2016.
Effect
The effect of this local law is to correct a drafting anomaly to provide that all persons in the City of Wanneroo district who keep bees must be a registered Beekeeper if required by the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management (Identification and Movement of Stock and Apiaries) Regulations 2013.
Role of Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (JSCDL)
The Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation is a committee of the Western Australian Parliament consisting of eight members, with equal representation from the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly.
Once a local law is gazetted, it is referred to the committee to consider under its terms of reference. Where the JSCDL finds that a local law offends one or more of its terms of reference, it will usually seek a written undertaking from the local government to amend or repeal the instrument in question.
Where a local government does not comply with the JSDCL’s request for an undertaking, the JSDCL may, as a last resort, resolve to report to the Parliament recommending the disallowance of the instrument in the Legislative Council.
The JSDCL’s Terms of Reference require the JSDCL to consider whether the instrument:
· is within power (for example; is an unreasonable exercise of the delegated legislative power, is procedurally invalid, abrogates a fundamental common law principle without express or necessarily implied authority from the empowering Act, is inconsistent with its empowering Act or other legislation).
· has any unintended effect on any person’s existing rights or interests (such as; reversal of onus of proof, excluding procedural fairness, acquisition of property without compensation, access to the Courts or judicial review).
· provides an effective mechanism for the review of administrative decisions.
· contains only matters that is appropriate for subsidiary legislation.
The proposed new Animals Local Law, is based on comparable local laws that have passed the scrutiny of the JSCDL.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.12 of the Act prescribes the procedures for making and finalising the process of adopting Local Laws.
Whilst the Act does not expressly prescribe a time frame in which the procedural requirements for making Local Laws are to be completed, the procedures should be undertaken with “all convenient speed’ in line with the Interpretations Act 1984.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost of giving public notice, advertising and gazettal is met through an operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Recommendation
That Council:-
1. In accordance with sections 3.12(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 1995, GIVES local public notice stating that it proposes to make an Animals Local Law 2021 and a Bee Keeping Amendment Local Law 2021 a summary of the purpose and effect of the local laws being;
Animals Local Law 2021
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to provide for the regulation, control and management of the keeping of large animals, poultry and pigeons within the City of Wanneroo district.
Effect
The effect of this local law is to establish the requirements with which owners and occupiers of land within the City of Wanneroo district must comply in order to keep domestic animals such as large animals, poultry and pigeons and provides the means of enforcing the local law.
Bee Keeping Amendment Local Law 2021
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to amend the City of Wanneroo Bee Keeping Local Law 2016.
Effect
The effect of this local law is to correct a drafting anomaly to provide that all persons in the City of Wanneroo district who keep bees must be a registered Beekeeper if required by the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management (Identification and Movement of Stock and Apiaries) Regulations 2013.
2. NOTES that:
a) Copies of the proposed local laws may be inspected at the City’s offices and will be made available on the City’s website;
b) Submissions about the proposed local laws may be made to the City within a period of not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given;
c) In accordance with section 3.12(3)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, as soon as the notice is given, a copy of the proposed local laws will be supplied to the Minister for Local Government and in the case of the Bee Keeping Amendment Local Law 2021, to the Minister of Agriculture;
d) In accordance with section 3.12(3)(c) of the Local Government Act 1995, a copy of the proposed local laws will be supplied to any person requesting it; and
3. NOTES that all submissions received will be presented to Council for consideration.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Consolidated Animals Local Law 1999 - as amended January 2017 |
16/270727 |
|
|
2⇩. |
Attachment 2 - Animals Local Law 2021 |
21/182114 |
|
|
3⇩. |
Attachment 3 - City of Wanneroo Bee Keeping Local Law 2016 - Administration Version |
16/420150 |
|
|
4⇩. |
Attachment 4 - Bee Keeping Amendment Local Law 2021 |
21/157220 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 585
File Ref: 12895V03 – 21/220357
Responsible Officer: Executive Manager Governance and Legal
Disclosure of Interest: Nil
Attachments: 1
Previous Items: 3.1 - Review of Standing Orders Local Law 2008 - Forum - 25 May 2021 8:00pm (Special)
Issue
To consider the review of the City’s Standing Orders Local Law 2008 and adoption of minor amendments for State-wide advertising.
Background
The Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) requires that Council review the City of Wanneroo local laws every eight years to ensure that they remain current and adhere to legislation.
Council Members have considered a review and proposed amendments to the City’s Standing Orders Local Law (SOLL2008) including a comparison against other local governments and the WALGA Meeting Procedures Template Local Law, changes to provisions dealing with deputations, public statement time, petitions, motions on notice, terms of reference for committees to be set by Council, and the provision and acceptance of documents by Council Members prior to a Council meeting.
Detail
The drafting of an amendment local law is overly complex and given the numerous amendments, Administration considers it appropriate to recommend that Council repeal the SOLL2008 and adopt a new Standing Orders Local Law 2021, which is essence amends the SOLL2008 and as set out in Attachment 1. The local law retains the format of the 2018 local law version and includes all amendments proposed through previous Forum Meetings.
Further matters raised by Council Members are presented in mark-up and include:-
· Section 4.16: Prevention of Disturbance which relates to the use of mobile phones during Council Meetings;
· Section 9.5: Giving a document to a Council Member prior to meetings; and
· Section 10.1: Penalties for breaches of the Standing Orders Local Law.
Council is to note that the version of the Standing Orders Local Law 2021 that will be made avaialble for advertising will not contain any mark-up.
Consultation
Council is to consider the outcome of the review undertaken by Administration and as a result the local laws have been amended to reflect Council Members views.
The local government is to give local public notice stating that the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarised in the notice and provide a copy of the proposed local law at locations specified in the notice. Section 1.7 of the Act states that the notice must be given in at least 3 of the ways prescribed. The notice will be published on the City’s website, on the City’s notice boards at the Civic Centre and all libraries and through the City’s social media.
Submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than six weeks after the notice is given and as soon as the notice is given, is to provide a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister.
Comment
The Council is required to make the local law in accordance with section 3.12 of the Act and approve the giving of State-wide public notice in order to seek public comment.
The agenda and the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting at which the local law is considered is to include the purpose and effect of the proposed local law, which are set out below.
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to provide for the orderly conduct of the proceedings and business of the Council.
Effect
The effect of this local law is that all council and committee meetings as described in the Local Government Act 1995, shall be governed by the Standing Orders Local Law 2021 unless otherwise provided in the Local Government Act 1995, the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1995 or other written law.
Role of Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation (JSCDL)
The Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation is a committee of the Western Australian Parliament consisting of eight members, with equal representation from the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly.
Once a local law is gazetted, it is referred to the committee to consider under its terms of reference. Where the JSCDL finds that a local law offends one or more of its terms of reference, it will usually seek a written undertaking from the local government to amend or repeal the instrument in question.
Where a local government does not comply with the JSDCL’s request for an undertaking, the JSDCL may, as a last resort, resolve to report to the Parliament recommending the disallowance of the instrument in the Legislative Council.
The JSDCL’s Terms of Reference require the JSDCL to consider whether the instrument:
· is within power (for example; is an unreasonable exercise of the delegated legislative power, is procedurally invalid, abrogates a fundamental common law principle without express or necessarily implied authority from the empowering Act, is inconsistent with its empowering Act or other legislation).
· has any unintended effect on any person’s existing rights or interests (such as; reversal of onus of proof, excluding procedural fairness, acquisition of property without compensation, access to the Courts or judicial review).
· provides an effective mechanism for the review of administrative decisions.
· contains only matters that is appropriate for subsidiary legislation.
Statutory Compliance
Section 3.12 of the Act prescribes the procedures for making and finalising the process of adopting Local Laws.
Whilst the Act does not expressly prescribe a time frame in which the procedural requirements for making local laws are to be completed, the procedures should be undertaken with “all convenient speed’ in line with the Interpretations Act 1984.
Strategic Implications
The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027:
“4 Civic Leadership
4.2 Good Governance
4.2.1 Provide transparent and accountable governance and leadership”
Risk Management Considerations
There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.
Policy Implications
Nil
Financial Implications
The cost of giving public notice, advertising and gazettal is met through an operational budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
That Council:-
1. In accordance with sections 3.12(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 1995, GIVES local public notice stating that it proposes to make a Standing Orders Local Law 2021 a summary of the purpose and effect of the local law being;
Purpose
The purpose of this local law is to provide for the orderly conduct of the proceedings and business of the Council.
Effect
The effect of this local law is that all council and committee meetings as described in the Local Government Act 1995, shall be governed by the Standing Orders Local Law 2021 unless otherwise provided in the Local Government Act 1995, the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1995 or other written law.
2. NOTES that:
a) Copies of the proposed local laws may be inspected at the City’s offices and will be made available on the City’s website;
b) Submissions about the proposed local laws may be made to the City within a period of not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given;
c) In accordance with section 3.12(3)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, as soon as the notice is given, a copy of the proposed local law will be supplied to the Minister for Local Government; and
d) In accordance with section 3.12(3)(c) of the Local Government Act 1995, a copy of the proposed local laws will be supplied to any person requesting it; and
3. NOTES that all submissions received will be presented to Council for consideration.
|
1⇩. |
Attachment 1 - Standing Orders Local Law 2008 - Administration version as amended |
17/229251 |
|
CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Council Members' Briefing Session 08 June, 2021 630
Item 5 Motions on Notice
Item 6 Late Reports (to be circulated under separate cover)
Nil
Item 8 Confidential
File Ref: SD151110V03 – 21/232623
Responsible Officer: Director, Corporate Strategy & Performance
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(b) the personal affairs of any person
(e)(ii) a matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government
File Ref: 34883 – 21/219974
Responsible Officer: Director, Assets
This report is to be dealt with in confidential session, under the terms of the Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.23(2), as follows:
(c) a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a mater to be discussed at the meeting
The next Ordinary Council Meeting has been scheduled for 6:00pm on Tuesday 11 May 2021, to be held at Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo.
