COUNCIL Agenda

Ordinary Council Meeting

 

6:00pm 23 September 2025

Council Chamber (Level 1), Civic Centre,

23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo

 

 

wanneroo.wa.gov.au

PROCEDURE FOR ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING

PUBLIC QUESTION AND STATEMENT TIME

The City encourages any members of the public who wish to raise a question to Council to submit this information via the City’s online forms and/or contact Council Services on
9405 5000.

·                Public Question online form

The City will make every endeavour to provide a response to any submissions at the meeting. All submissions will form part of the electronic meeting and will be recorded in the Minutes of the Council meeting.

1.         Time Permitted

A minimum of 15 minutes is permitted for Public Question Time at Council Meetings. If there are not sufficient questions to fill the allocated time, the Presiding Member will move to the next item. If there are more questions to be considered within 15 minutes, the Presiding Member will determine whether to extend Public Question Time. Each person seeking to ask questions during Public Question Time may address the Council for a maximum of three minutes each. 

2.         Protocols

No member of the public may interrupt the Council Meeting proceedings or enter into conversation. 

Members of the public wishing to participate in Public Question Time at the Council Meeting are to register on the night at the main reception desk located outside of Council Chambers. Members of the public wishing to submit written questions are encouraged to lodge them with the Chief Executive Officer at least 30 hours prior to the start of the meeting (that is, by 12noon the day before the meeting).

The Presiding Member will control Public Question Time and ensure that each person wishing to ask a question is given a fair and equal opportunity to do so. Members of the public wishing to ask a question must state his or her name and address before asking a question. If the question relates to an item on the Agenda, the item number and title should be stated.

3.         General Rules

The following general rules apply to Public Question and Statement Time:

·                Public Questions and Statements should only relate to the business of the local government and should not be a personal statement or opinion;

·                Only questions relating to matters affecting the local government will be considered at a Council Meeting, and only questions that relate to the purpose of the meeting will be considered at a Special Council Meeting; 

·                Questions may be taken on notice and responded to after the meeting;

·                Questions may not be directed at specific Council Members or City Employee;

·                Questions are not to be framed in such a way as to reflect adversely on a particular Council Member or City Employee;

·                First priority will be given to persons who are asking questions relating to items on the current Council Meeting Agenda; and

·                Second priority will be given to Public Statements. Only Public Statements regarding items on the Council Agenda under consideration will be heard.

Please ensure mobile phones are switched off before entering the Council Chamber.

For further information, please contact Council Services on 9405 5000.

 

 

AUDIO OF COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS

The audio and visual proceedings of this meeting will be live broadcast online with the exception of matters discussed behind closed doors. That broadcast will remain available following the conclusion of the meeting.

To access a live stream of Council Proceedings please click below. The live stream will commence at the scheduled time and date of the meeting.

·                Live stream audio of Council Proceedings

To access audio recording of previous meetings, please click below:

·                Audio recordings

 

RECORDING AND ACCESS TO RECORDINGS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS POLICY

 

 

1.         POLICY STATEMENT

All Ordinary and Special Meetings of Council, Agenda Briefing Forums and meetings of Electors will be live streamed and digitally recorded, consistent with the objectives of the Local Government Act 1995, section 1.3 (2)(c), which promotes greater accountability of local governments to their communities. This policy does not apply to any part of the meeting which is closed to the public in accordance with section 5.23 of the Local Government Act 1995.

2.         OBJECTIVE AND PURPOSE

Objective

The objective of this policy is to ensure there is a process in place to outline the access to recorded Council Meetings.

Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to ensure that Council Members, the community, government bodies and other stakeholders are able to access recordings of the proceedings of Council meetings in compliance with the Local Government Act 1995 and associated Regulations.

3.         KEY DEFINITIONS

Act	Means the Local Government Act 1995
Administration	The operational arm of the City which includes the employees and is headed by the CEO
Agenda Briefing	Meeting where Council Members and the community can ask questions, seek clarification and request further information on all matters due for deliberation and consideration at the forthcoming ordinary council meeting and is open to the public.
Annual General Meeting of Electors	Meeting held in accordance with section 5.27 of the Act.
Council Member	Means a person elected under the Act as a member of the council of the local government and includes the Mayor or president of the local government
Electronic recording	Means any recording made by an electronic device capable of recording sound and or vision.
Employee	Means a person employed by a local government under section 5.36(1) of the Act.
Ordinary Council Meeting	A formal meeting of Council conducted in accordance with the Act and applicable local laws for the purpose of considering and dealing with the ordinary business of the Council.
Special Council Meeting	Meeting held for the purpose of considering and dealing with council business that is urgent, complex in nature, for a particular purpose or confidential.
Special Meeting of Electors	Meeting held in accordance with section 5.28 of the Act.

4.         SCOPE

This Policy applies to Council Members and employees of the City of Wanneroo.  This Policy does not extend to meetings, or any part of the meeting which is closed to the public in accordance with section 5.23 of the Local Government Act 1995.

5.         IMPLICATIONS

The policy aligns with the following Strategic Community Plan Goal and Priorities:

Strategic Community Plan 2021-2031

Goal 7: A well-governed and managed City that makes informed decisions, provides strong community leadership and valued customer focused services.

Priority 7.2 – Responsibly and ethically managed. The City of Wanneroo will be managed responsibly to ensure a long-term, sustainable future. The City will have effective governance arrangements and ethical leadership that is open and transparent, ensuring a clear understanding of roles and accountabilities.

6.         IMPLEMENTATION

6.1.            This Policy shall be printed within the Agenda of all Council Meetings, which include:

·                Ordinary Council Meeting;

·                Special Council Meeting;

·                Annual General Meeting of Electors;

·                Special Electors Meeting; and

·                Agenda Briefing Session.

to advise the public that the proceedings of the meeting are recorded.

Recording of Proceedings

6.2.            Proceedings of Meetings detailed in this policy, as well as Deputations and Public Question Time during these meetings, shall be recorded by the City on audio and video recording equipment.  Meetings and portions of Meetings taking place in closed session will be recorded on audio recording equipment.

6.3.            No member of the public is to use any audio-visual technology or devices to record the proceedings of a Meeting, without the written permission of the Mayor or the Mayor’s Delegate.

6.4.            Arrangements for the broadcast and recording of meetings conducted by electronic means under s14D of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996 (Regulations), for example in the situation of a public health emergency or state of emergency, will be made in compliance with ss.14H and 14I of the Regulations.

6.5.            Arrangements for the recording of Meetings not held at the Council’s usual meeting place, or for the recording of Meetings in the event of a technological failure of the City’s recording equipment, will be made in compliance with ss.14I(2) to 14I(9) of the Regulations.

6.6.            In compliance with the City’s approved Recordkeeping Plan and the State Records Act 2000, recordings made under this policy will be retained for the period specified in the General Retention and Disposal Authority for Local Government Information.

Access to Recordings

6.7.            Recordings of Meetings made under this policy will be published via the City’s online channels no later than fourteen days after the Meeting and will remain accessible for a minimum period of five years after the Meeting date.

6.8.            Members of the public may purchase a copy of the recorded proceedings or alternatively, listen to the recorded proceedings at the Civic Centre online once the recording is published on the City of Wanneroo website. Costs for providing a copy of the recorded proceedings to members of the public will include staff time to make the copy of the proceedings, as well as the cost of the digital copy for the recording to be placed on. The cost of staff time will be set in the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges each financial year.

6.9.            Council Members may request a copy of the recording of the Council proceedings at no charge.

6.10.         All Council Members are to be notified when recordings are requested by members of the public or by Council Members.

6.11.         All electronic recording content is the property of the City of Wanneroo.  Reproduction without written authorisation of the City of Wanneroo is prohibited.

7.         ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Policy is the responsibility of the Manager Corporate Governance and Council Services.

8.         DISPUTE RESOLUTION

All disputes in regard to this policy will be referred to the General Counsel in the first instance. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached, the matter will be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer for a ruling.

9.         EVALUATION AND REVIEW PROVISIONS

This policy will be evaluated and its effectiveness reviewed by the following key performance measures:

·             All relevant meetings recorded;

·             Acceptable quality of recordings captured; and

·             Resolution of requests for copies of recordings within appropriate timeframes.

10.       RELATED DOCUMENTS

City of Wanneroo Recordkeeping Plan

Ordinary Council Meetings and Forums of Council Policy

City of Wanneroo Standing Orders Local Law 2021

11.       REFERENCES

Local Government Act 1995

Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996

State Records Act 2000

General Retention and Disposal Authority for Local Government Information

12.       RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Manager Corporate Governance & Council Services

COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS AND THEIR MEANING

 

Acronym	Meaning
ABN	Australian Business Number
ACN	Australian Company Number
Act	Local Government Act 1995
CBP	City of Wanneroo Corporate Business Plan
CHRMAP	Coastal Hazard Risk Management & Adaption Plan
City	City of Wanneroo
CPI	Consumer Price Index
DBCA	Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions
DFES	Department of Fire and Emergency Services
DOE	Department of Education Western Australia
DOH	Department of Health
DPLH	Department of Planning Lands and Heritage
DPS2	District Planning Scheme No. 2
DLGIRS	Department of Local Government, Industry Regulation and Safety
DWER	Department of Water and Environmental Regulation
EPA	Environmental Protection Authority
GST	Goods and Services Tax
JDAP	Joint Development Assessment Panel
LTFP	Long Term Financial Plan
MRS	Metropolitan Region Scheme
MRWA	Main Roads Western Australia
POS	Public Open Space
PTA	Public Transport Authority of Western Australia
SAT	State Administrative Tribunal
SCP	City of Wanneroo Strategic Community Plan
WALGA	Western Australian Local Government Association
WAPC	Western Australian Planning Commission

 

 

 

Notice is given that the next Ordinary Council Meeting will be held in the

Council Chamber (Level 1), Civic Centre,

23 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo on Tuesday 23 September, 2025 commencing at 6:00pm.

 

K Davis

Acting Chief Executive Officer

17 September, 2025

 

CONTENTS

Item  1           Attendances   1

Item  2           Apologies and Leave of Absence  1

Item  3           Public Question and Statement Time   1

Item  4           Confirmation of Minutes   1

OC01-09/25    Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 August 2025  1

Item  5           Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion   1

Item  6           Questions from Council Members   1

Item  7           Petitions   1

New Petitions Received  1

Update on Petitions  1

Item  8           Reports   2

Planning and Sustainability  2

Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment  2

PS01-09/25    Consent to Advertise - East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Development Contribution Arrangement - Annual Review of Costs (2025-2026) 2

PS02-09/25    Consent to Advertise - Alkimos/Eglinton Development Contribution Plan - Annual Review of Costs (2025-2026) 47

PS03-09/25    Consent to Advertise - Yanchep Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan - Annual Review of Costs (2025-2026) 66

Approval Services  85

PS04-09/25    Consideration of Amendment No. 227 Following Advertising – Normalisation of Land in the Lots 1001 and 1002 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 60 and Agora Village - Trinity at Alkimos Pt Lot 9005 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Centre Structure Plan No. 86 Areas  85

PS05-09/25    Consideration of Amendment No. 221 Following Advertising - Normalisation of Land in the East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Local Structure Plan No. 57 Area  128

Assets  166

Asset Operations & Services  166

AS01-09/25    **State and National Blackspot Program 2026-2027  166

Strategic Asset Management  179

AS02-09/25    Variable Speed Zoning, Wanneroo Townsite  179

Waste Services  183

AS03-09/25    Provision of Bin-Mounted Dog Waste Bag Dispensers  183

AS04-09/25    **Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct - Advertising of Local Government Act Section 3.59 Business Plan  187

AS05-09/25    Response to Petition - PT01-06/25 Closure of Public Access Way, Rupara Circle, Quinns Rocks. 213

AS06-09/25    Response to Petition PT04-06/25 - Speed Bumps on Southampton Lane, Mindarie  220

AS07-09/25    Response to Petition - PT05-06/25 Nighttime Closure and Increased Security of the Public Boardwalk and Jetty at the South-West Corner of Mindarie Marina  226

Community & Place  233

Community Development  233

CP01-09/25    Response to Petition PT02-06/25 - Banning of Fishing at Mindarie Marina  233

CP02-09/25    Response to Petition PT03 -06/25 - Banning of Swimming at Mindarie Marina  238

CP03-09/25    Ni Kadadjiny Koort, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group - Terms of Reference  247

CP04-09/25    Multicultural Advisory Group - Term of Reference  256

Corporate Strategy & Performance  266

Business & Finance  266

CS01-09/25    Financial Activity Statement for the Period Ended 31 July 2025  266

Transactional Finance  287

CS02-09/25    Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 August 2025  287

CS03-09/25    Warrant of Payments for the Period to 31 July 2025  374

Chief Executive Office  469

Office of the CEO   469

CE01-09/25    **Strategic Risks Profile and High Rated Risks Update  469

Legal & Governance  474

CE02-09/25    **Review of Committees, Working and Advisory Groups  474

Item  9           Motions on Notice   483

Item  10         Late Reports (see Supplementary Agenda) 483

PS06-09/25    Amendment No. 234 of the District Structure Plan No. 2 – Lot 507 (No. 50) Salerno Drive, Mindarie  483

CS04-09/25    2024/25 Quarter 4 Corporate Performace Report  483

CE03-09/25    Updated Three Year Strategic Internal Audit Plan 2025/26 to 2027/28  483

Item  11         Urgent Business   483

Item  12         Confidential  483

Item  13         Date of Next Meeting   483

Item  14         Closure   483

 

**Indicates that changes and/or information has been added to the report following Agenda Briefing.

This meeting today is being held on Whadjuk Noongar Boodja and we would like to acknowledge and pay my respects to Elders, past, present and future. I thank all past and present members of the community that have supported the City to better understand and value Nyoongar culture within the City of Wanneroo.

 

I invite you to bow your head in prayer:

 

Lord, We thank you for blessing our City, our community and our Council. Guide us all in our decision making to act fairly, without fear or favour and with compassion, integrity, wisdom and honesty. May we show true leadership, be inclusive of all, and guide all of the City’s people and many families to a prosperous future that all may share. We ask this in your name. Amen.

 

Item  1     Attendances

Item  2     Apologies and Leave of Absence

Item  3     Public Question and Statement Time

Item  4     Confirmation of Minutes

That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 26 August 2025 be confirmed.

Item  5     Announcements by the Mayor without Discussion

Item  6     Questions from Council Members

Item  7     Petitions

New Petitions Received

Update on Petitions

 

Item  8     Reports

Declarations of Interest by Council Members, including the nature and extent of the interest. Declaration of Interest forms to be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer.

Planning and Sustainability

Strategic Land Use Planning & Environment

File Ref:                                              5734V009 – 25/243349

Responsible Officer:                          Director Planning & Sustainability

Attachments:                                       10         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider the revised cost estimates as part of the 2025-2026 Annual Review for the East Wanneroo Cells 1-9 Development Contribution Plans (DCP) for Councils consent to advertise.

Background

The City of Wanneroo’s (the City’s) District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS No.2) provides the statutory basis for the administration and management of developer contributions.

 

The East Wanneroo Cells include the areas of Wanneroo, Ashby, Tapping, Hocking, Pearsall, Landsdale, Darch, Madeley and Wangara (refer Attachment 1).

 

The last Annual Review for Cells 1-9 was approved by Council on 25 February 2025 (PS02-02/25), where the following Infrastructure Cost Per Lot (ICPL) rates and land valuations were approved for the 2024-2025 review period. The below ICPL rates and land valuations will remain current until the adoption of the next annual review:

 

·        Cell 1 - ICPL rate of $18,019 and a land valuation of $1,900,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 2 - ICPL rate of $19,701 and a land valuation of $2,000,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 3 - ICPL rate of $28,702 and a land valuation of $2,000,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 4 - ICPL rate of $23,328 and land valuation of $2,050,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 5 - ICPL rate of $30,909 and a land valuation of $2,125,500 per hectare

·        Cell 6 - ICPL rate of $24,678 and a land valuation of $2,350,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 7 - Contribution rate of $12.42 per/m² and a land valuation of $3,500,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 8 - Contribution rate of $34.53 per/m² and a land valuation of $3,300,000 per hectare; and

·        Cell 9 - ICPL rate of $29,947 and a land valuation of $2,350,000 per hectare.

 

This report is considering the Annual Review requirements of Cells 1-9 for the 2025-2026 period to ensure that cost contribution amounts are correctly adjusted to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the costs of delivering the required infrastructure.

The listed infrastructure is outlined in DPS No.2 and reflects the prioritisation of infrastructure established in the City’s Long Term Financial Plan and the Capital Works Program.

Detail

The following reflects the revised cost estimates for the various elements of the Annual Review and a recommended approach for each cell (1-9).

 

Land Valuation

 

In accordance with DPS No.2, the City engaged a valuation panel (2 independent valuers) and obtained a consensus agreement on land values on 23 July 2025. The following table reflects the valuation panel recommendations and the change in value since the last Annual Review.

 

The recommended land values have been included into the Annual Review for each of the Cells for the remaining acquisition costs. It is noted that the recommended valuations represent an increase for land values in Cells 2 to 4 and 6 to 9 which reflects current market conditions and sales evidence. Cells 1 and 5 do not require land valuations as all land acquisitions have been finalised.

Closure of Cell Provisions

 

Cell 1 and Cell 5 have no Cell Works remaining. In accordance with State Planning Policy (SPP3.6), Administration is required to take the appropriate steps to close a DCP within 12 months of the infrastructure being delivered.

 

Administration has conducted ongoing discussions with relevant stakeholders and has engaged with the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH). Additionally, Administration has recently reviewed external legal advice that an amendment to DPS No.2 will be required to enable closure of Cells where some landholdings remain undeveloped.

 

It is anticipated that a report will be presented to Concept Forum in the next few months to consider the appropriate processes and provisions to be outlined in the closure provisions. Once closure procedures are established, Administration will initiate the closure process for Cells 1 and 5 and any further Cells, where Cell Works have been completed.

 

Operational Periods

 

Scheme Amendment No. 208 was considered by Council on 20 February 2024 (PS02-02/24) who supported the adoption of introducing operational periods to East Wanneroo Cells 1-9. These operational periods align with the provisions and guidelines of State Planning Policy 3.6 – Infrastructure Contributions (SPP3.6) and provide an estimated timeline to ensure Cell Works are completed within a reasonable timeframe in their respective Cells.

Cell 1 (Ashby/ Tapping)

 

Cell 1 is 98% developed with only an estimated 63 lots remaining to be developed. All cell works have been completed in Cell 1. The Cell 1 operational period ends on 30 June 2027, however, the City will continue to prioritise cell closure as soon as possible. Administration is investigating an acceptable procedure to secure remaining contributions from remaining landowners and close the DCP as a soon as practicable.

 

The salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 2.

 

Recommendation – Administration is recommending that the ICPL rate of $18,019 be retained to ensure all developers contribute at a fair and equitable rate, pending closure of the cell

 

Cell 2 (Sinagra)

 

Cell 2 is 69% developed with an estimated 873 lots remaining to be developed. Cell 2 continues to develop rapidly due to the relocation of the Inghams poultry farm, which has enabled developers to obtain subdivision approval. The Cell 2 operational period ends on 30 June 2033, however Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible

 

There is still a significant area (approximately 6 hectares) of Public Open Space (POS) yet to be acquired, two outstanding District Distributor Road (DDR) land acquisitions and one Capital Works project for upgrading Dundebar Road.

 

The estimated return of excess funds to previous contributors has increased from $8.2 million to $8.6 million. This corresponds to a reduction in the Cell 2 rate from $19,701 to $18,357 ($1,344 decrease). The changes are primarily due to additional interest on the cell accounts and higher lot yields created, generating more than expected income. The methodology of apportioning estimated excess returns is the same as the last annual review which was approved by Council.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 3.

 

Recommendation – Despite increases in Cell Work costs, Cell 2 is generating higher than expected lot yields, therefore generating excess income. Administration is recommending that the ICPL rate be decreased from $19,701 to $18,357 due to the generation of excess income. The proposed small decrease in the ICPL rate will still ensure adequate funding to deliver the remaining Cell Works

 

Cell 3 (Wanneroo)

 

Cell 3 is 90% developed with an estimated 46 lots remaining to be developed. All POS areas have been acquired. There are currently five outstanding land acquisitions associated with the widening of Dundebar Road and one capital works project to widen and upgrade Dundebar Road. The Cell 3 operational period ends on 30 June 2032, however, Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

It is noted that an additional funding source is required to contribute towards 50% of the cost of widening and upgrading Dundebar Road between Griffiths Road and Steven Street. It is anticipated that contributions may be obtained from the future East Wanneroo landowners on the northern side of Dundebar Road (future East Wanneroo Precinct No. 6) through a future Local DCP or subdivision process. If funding is not available however, then the City may need to consider alternative funding sources to achieve the estimated time frames or choose to delay the construction of this section of road upgrading.

Administration will shortly undertake a design review for Dundebar Road to outline the extent of land required, which will then be included into the DCP annual review of costs.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 4.

 

Recommendation – The remaining Cell Work costs have only increased a minor amount therefore Administration is recommending that the ICPL rate be increased from $28,702 to $28,909 to ensure adequate funding to deliver the remaining Cell Works.

 

Cell 4 (Hocking/ Pearsall)

 

Cell 4 is 94% developed with an estimated 246 lots remaining to be developed. There are two outstanding POS land acquisitions to be resolved, one outstanding DDR land acquisition and four outstanding capital works projects.

 

The Cell 4 operational period ends on 30 June 2033, however Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 5.

 

Recommendation – Despite an increase in Cell Work costs, Administration is recommending the ICPL rate of $23,328 be retained as there is potential excess income expected to be generated at full development. This estimated excess income is proposed to be used to help fund the remaining Cell Works.

 

Cell 5 (Landsdale - West)

 

Cell 5 is 97% developed with only an estimated 105 lots remaining to be developed to secure remaining income. All cell works have been completed in Cell 5. The Cell 5 operational period ends on 30 June 2029, however, Administration will seek to close this Cell as soon as possible due to all Cell Works being completed. Administration is investigating an acceptable procedure to secure remaining contributions from remaining landowners and close the DCP as a soon as practicable.

 

The salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 6.

 

Recommendation – Administration is recommending that the current ICPL rate of $30,909 be retained to ensure all developers contribute at a fair and equitable rate, pending closure of the cell

Cell 6 (Madeley/Darch)

Cell 6 is 90% developed with an estimated 452 lots yet to be developed. There are four POS acquisitions outstanding, two Historical POS payments, one remaining road widening land acquisition and one capital works project. The Cell 6 operational period ends on 30 June 2034, however Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

The capital works project relates to the Gnangara Road realignment and construction (between Wanneroo Road to Hartman Drive) and is still scheduled for completion by 2031. This project is a shared cost between Cells 6 and 7. Concept designs are still being prepared with relevant stakeholders for the Whitfords Avenue and Wanneroo Road intersection and is awaiting a funding commitment by the State Government to facilitate the works.

The City will continue negotiations with landowners to complete the remaining Cell funded portions of land acquisitions for the Gnangara Road realignment, pending the final intersection design being designed and funded by the Western Australian Planning Commission and Main Roads WA.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 7.

 

Recommendation - Despite an increase in Cell Work costs, Administration is recommending the ICPL rate of $24,678 be retained as there is potential excess income expected to be generated at full development. This estimated excess of income is proposed to be used to help fund the remaining Cell Works.

 

Cell 7 (Wangara Industrial - West)

 

Cell 7 is 81% developed with an estimated 19.4 hectares remaining to be developed. The Cell 7 operational period ends on 30 June 2034, however, Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

There are three DDR acquisitions outstanding and two outstanding capital works remaining, including the realignment of Gnangara Road (shared 50% with Cell 6). The Gnangara Road realignment and construction (Wanneroo Rd to Hartman Drive) is shared between Cells 6 and 7, however it is not scheduled until 2031.

 

The new shared pathway along Hartman Drive, from Ocean Reef Road to Gnangara Road is identified as a Cell Work with costs shared between East Wanneroo Cells 7 and 8. For the Cell 7 portion of the project, this requires additional funding with $27,964.37. The Cell 7 cost increase of $27,964.37 is due to indexation. Administration is recommending that an additional funding amount of $27,964.37 be charged to the Cell 7 account.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 8.

 

Recommendation - Administration is recommending that the ICPL rate is increased from $12.42 per square metre to $13.41 per spare metre to ensure adequate funds are received to deliver remaining cell works.

 

Cell 8 (Wangara Industrial – East)

 

Cell 8 is 81% developed with an estimated 35 hectares of land remaining to be developed. The Cell 8 operational period ends on 30 June 2036, however, Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

There are eleven land acquisitions outstanding along Gnangara Road, which includes three from the area of Town Planning Scheme No.5 (TPS5) and two outstanding capital works remaining.

 

The remaining capital works relate to the upgrade and construction of Gnangara Road (Hartman to Mirrabooka) and additional funding for a shared pathway from Ocean Reef Road to Gnangara Road.

 

There are several land acquisitions to be completed to facilitate the construction of this section of the Gnangara Road realignment (between Hartman Drive to Mirrabooka Avenue) and Administration is currently in discussions with several landowners to progress the acquisition in a timely manner.

 

The new shared pathway along Hartman Drive, from Ocean Reef Road to Gnangara Road is identified as a Cell Work with costs shared between East Wanneroo Cells 7 and 8.

The project requires additional funding of $225,811.25 coming from the Cell 8 account. The increase in costs is due to the facilitation of Western Power upgrades, higher utility service relocation costs, and inclusion of night works for specific works. Administration is recommending that an additional funding amount of $225,811.25 be charged to the Cell 8 account.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 9.

 

Recommendation - Administration is recommending that the ICPL rate is changed from $34.53 per square metre to $37.84 per square metre due to indexation of construction costs, increase in land values and additional funding required for the shared pathway along Hartman Drive, from Ocean Reef Road to Gnangara Road. This increase in rate is to ensure adequate funding is available to deliver the remaining Cell Works.

 

Town Planning Scheme No.5 (TPS5) Account Funds and Land Acquisitions

 

TPS5 is a historic (1970’s) cost sharing agreement and relates to the old Landsdale Industrial area. The TPS5 scheme included land on the southern side of Gnangara Road and bounded by Mirrabooka Avenue, Hartman Drive and Furniss Road to the south. Infrastructure included the widening of Gnangara Road on the southern side, abutting TPS5. In 2001, DPS No.2 was adopted, resulting in the TPS5 scheme text being superseded by the TPS5 deeds. For many years, the City has held contribution payments by landowners in the TPS5 account and has progressively been acquiring land for road widenings along Gnangara Road using these funds, in accordance with the TPS5 Deeds.

 

There are three (3) land acquisitions from TPS5 that remain, and their estimated land values (including 10% solatium) are:

 

·    Lot 2 (356) Gnangara Road, Landsdale = $161,304.00 (excluding GST).

·    Lot 3 (344) Gnangara Road, Landsdale = $165,165.00 (excluding GST).

·    Lot 15 (248) Gnangara Road, Landsdale = $219,024.00 (excluding GST).

 

There is currently $235,333 remaining in the TPS5 account (on 30 June 2025) with the total estimated amount to acquire all remaining land acquisitions being $545,493 (excluding GST). This results in a shortfall of funding by $310,160 to acquire the remaining land acquisitions with no further projected income available from TPS5. As the land acquisitions are also identified as Cell Works in Cell 8, the remaining funding will be charged to the East Wanneroo Cell 8 DCP.

 

Recommendation - TPS5 funds be used to acquire the remaining land acquisitions for the Gnangara Road and when the TPS5 funds are depleted, the TPS5 account will be recommended for closure, which will be the subject of a separate Council report. The estimated remaining land acquisition of costs of $310,160 have been included into the East Wanneroo Cell 8 annual review.

 

Cell 9 (Landsdale – East)

 

Cell 9 is 91% developed with an estimated 216 lots remaining to be developed.

 

There are two outstanding POS acquisitions, four outstanding POS developments (this is the only Cell that requires POS acquisition and development), three outstanding buffer land and landscaping, four outstanding DDR works remaining and one outstanding capital works project involving the acquisition of land and construction for a local community building.

 

 

The Alexander Drive dual use pathway is a Cell Work identified for East Wanneroo Cell 9. The project was originally budgeted for $3,200,000 in 2021 and $2,281,775.28 has already been spent on the project (up to 30^th June 2025). The City’s project costs were recently updated and the total cost has increased from $3,200,000 to $5,295,320.42. This translates to a total project budget increase of $2,095,320.42.

 

The increase of cost is due to various factors, including:

 

·              Indexation to the original estimate of $3,200,000;

·              Additional works required to complete the project of $450.000;

·              Service relocation costs increased by around $500,000;

·              Implementation of restricted work hours in line with approved Traffic Management Plans; and

·              Inclusion of night shift requirements for specific works.

 

It is recommended that an additional $2,021,859 be included into the East Wanneroo Cell 9 DCP account to complete this project. Landscaping costs of $73,461 make up the difference to $2,095,320.42. The landscaping cost requires municipal funding as DCP’s do not cover this cost.

 

The Cell 9 operational period ends on 30 June 2033, however Administration will continue to prioritise cell works and close the cell earlier, where possible.

 

The revised cost estimates for the remaining Cell Works, including the salient aspects of the Annual Review are depicted in Attachment 10.

 

Recommendation – Despite an increase in Cell Work costs in projects such as the community purpose building and additional funding for the Alexander Drive dual use pathway, Administration is recommending the ICPL rate of $29,947 be retained as there is potential excess income expected to be generated at full development. This estimated excess of income is proposed to be used to help fund the remaining Cell Works.

 

Auditing

 

External auditing of the income and expenditure for 2024-2025 is performed by accounting firm, KPMG. The income and expenditure for the 2024-2025 financial year has been applied by this annual review, pending approval of the annual financial statements by Council later this year.

Consultation

DPS No.2 requires the proposed land values to be advertised for a period of 28 days and the revision of Cell Costs for a period of 42 days respectively. Advertising will be carried out by means of advertisements in newspapers, letters sent to affected landowners and on the City’s website. All forms of advertisement will be carried out concurrently.

Comment

ICPL Rates

Schedule 14 of DPS No.2 sets out the provisions for the management and implementation of the East Wanneroo Developer Contributions Arrangements. In accordance with these provisions, the City is required to annually review the Cell Costs and Council is required to determine whether to increase, decrease, or maintain the current ICPL rates.

 

The purpose of the annual DCP review process is to ensure that sufficient funds continue to be collected from developing landowners to meet the cost of delivering the infrastructure by the DCP. 

 

Based on revised costs of Cell Works in East Wanneroo Cells 1-9, the following ICPL rates and land valuations are recommended:

 

·        Cell 1 - ICPL rate of $18,019 (retained);

·        Cell 2 - ICPL rate of $18,357 (decreased by $1,344) and Land Valuation of $2,275,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 3 - ICPL rate of $28,909 (increased by $207) and Land Valuation of $2,275,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 4 - ICPL rate of $23,328 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,325,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 5 - ICPL rate of $30,909 (retained);

·        Cell 6 - ICPL rate of $24,678 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,550,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 7 - $13.41 per/m² (increased by $0.99 per/m²) and Land Valuation of $3,850,000 per hectare;

·        Cell 8 - $37.84 per/m² (increased by $3.31 per/m²) and Land Valuation of $3,650,000 per hectare; and

·        Cell 9 - ICPL rate of $29,947 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,550,000 per hectare.

 

If Council opted to apply the DCP methodology included in DPS No.2 it would result in a significant reduction in the ICPL rate for those who are still to contribute compared to those who have previously contributed. Given most Cells are between 80%-100% developed, Council, in the past, has opted to retain the same ICPL rates to mitigate large fluctuations in the ICPL rates prior to closure of the cells. Any excess funds generated at full development or closure of a cell can be returned to all contributing landowners equitably in accordance with DPS No.2.

 

The retention of ICPL rates are proposed for Cells 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9.

 

It should be noted that if remaining costs significantly increase, then retention of ICPL rates provides a buffer against increasing ICPL rates, however this does not prevent Council from raising rates if required to finalise the Cell Works.

 

Closure of Cell Provisions

 

Administration will continue to prioritise the completion of the remaining Cell Works. Administration intends to present a report to a Concept Forum on changes to DPS No.2 provisions to enable closure of Cells as soon as possible. This will be followed by a Scheme Amendment. Once closure provisions are established, Cells such as Cells 1 & 5 which no longer have Cell Works remaining will initiate a closure process and will soon be followed by other Cells where they are close to finalising all remaining Cell Works.

Statutory Compliance

In line with DPS No.2, the completion of the Annual Review as outlined in this report will satisfy the City’s statutory obligations to complete Annual Reviews for the 2025/2026 financial year.

 

External auditing of the DCP accounts has been completed and the City complies with the provisions of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.

 

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.1 - Develop to meet current need and future growth

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Chief Executive Officer	Manage

 

The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The Annual review of the DCP will assist in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it will ensure that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships will apply as a key element in the DCP review process to maintain effective engagement with relevant stakeholders.

 

Policy Implications

 

Nil

Financial Implications

The East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 developer contribution arrangements are subject to an Annual Review process to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly set to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the cost of infrastructure items.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

 

Recommendation

That Council APPROVES to advertise the revised Cost Estimates and the estimated Infrastructure Cost Per Lot for the East Wanneroo Cell 1-9 for a period of 42 days in accordance with Clause 1.11.5 of District Planning Scheme No. 2, as depicted in Attachments 2-10 and depicted below:

1.       Cell 1 – Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $18,019 (retained);

2.       Cell 2 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $18,357 (decreased by $1,344) and Land Valuation of $2,275,000 per hectare;

3.       Cell 3 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $28,909 (increased by $207) and Land Valuation of $2,275,000 per hectare;

4.       Cell 4 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $23,328 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,325,000 per hectare;

5.       Cell 5 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $30,909 (retained);

6.       Cell 6 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $24,678 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,550,000 per hectare;

7.       Cell 7 - Contribution rate of $13.41 per/m² (increased by $0.99 per/m²) and Land Valuation of $3,850,000 per hectare;

8.       Cell 8 - Contribution rate of $37.84 per/m² (increased by $3.31 per/m²) and Land Valuation of $3,650,000 per hectare; and

9.       Cell 9 - Infrastructure Cost Per Lot rate of $29,947 (retained) and Land Valuation of $2,550,000 per hectare.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 - Cells 1-9 Consolidated Location Plan	19/162679
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - East Wanneroo Cell 1 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261844
3⇩.	Attachment 3 - East Wanneroo Cell 2 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261846
4⇩.	Attachment 4 - East Wanneroo Cell 3 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261848
5⇩.	Attachment 5 - East Wanneroo Cell 4 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261851
6⇩.	Attachment 6 - East Wanneroo Cell 5 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261854
7⇩.	Attachment 7 - East Wanneroo Cell 6 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261855
8⇩.	Attachment 8 - East Wanneroo Cell 7 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261859
9⇩.	Attachment 9 - East Wanneroo Cell 8 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261862
10⇩.	Attachment 10 - East Wanneroo Cell 9 - Annual Review 2025-2026	25/261863

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

File Ref:                                              31031 – 25/251387

Responsible Officer:                          Director Planning & Sustainability

Attachments:                                       2         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Any changes or additional information following Agenda Briefing will be shown here.

 

·        Administration has added further information to be read under the Detail section of the report, located as the last paragraph to the ‘Land Acquisition Valuation’ sub-section, which reads as per the following: “Council has previously approved the acquisition of the land for the co-location of the Alkimos Aquatic Recreation Centre (AARC) (incorporating the Alkimos Indoor Recreation Centre) (report CR02-04/23) and Administration is currently finalising the land acquisition which should be completed in late 2025.”

·        Administration has amended the table to be read under the Detail section of the report as removing the land value of $4,000,000 mentioned in the table for the Alkimos Indoor Recreation Centre as the land for this site has an agreed upon price with the transfer of land currently being finalised.

·        Administration has amended the table to be read under the Detail section of the report as including the size of the site for each facility to be acquired. Additionally, the estimated land value of each site and their land valuations have been separated to be read as part of their own columns. Please see below for how the updated table should be read:

 

Facility	Size of Site	Estimated Land Value of Site	Land Valuation
Alkimos:
Library Site	8,000m2	$2,300,000	287.50/m2
Community Centre Site	8,000m2	$2,300,000	287.50/m2
Eglinton:
Library Site	8,000m2	$2,300,000	287.50/m2
Community Centre Site	8,000m2	$2,300,000	287.50/m2
Indoor Recreation Centre Site	15,000m2	$4,000,000	266.67m2

 

Issue

To consider the revised cost estimates as part of the 2025-2026 Annual Review for the Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan (DCP) for Councils consent to advertise.

Background

The Development Contribution Area (DCA) is shown on the DPS No.2 Map as Special Control Area – DCA1 (refer Attachment 1).

 

The DCP infrastructure costs include planning, design, project management, construction, land acquisition and Administration costs associated with the following district facilities:

 

·        Surf Life Saving Club;

·        Public Open Space (x2);

·        Multipurpose Hard Courts (x2);

·        Community Centre (x2);

·        Library (x2); and

·        Indoor Recreation Centres (x2).

 

In accordance with DPS No.2, the DCP has an operation period of 25 years (expiring 2039) and during this time period the City of Wanneroo (City) is required to review the various elements of the DCP at one and five year intervals, as per the following:

 

·        Annually - DCP cost estimates; DCP cost indexation; contributing land area; and cost per hectare.

·        Five Yearly - Community Facility Plan (CFP) assumptions and recommendations; and full DCP review.

 

As of 30 June 2025, the Alkimos-Eglinton DCP account holds a total of $37,403,178.43 in collected contributions from landowners and interest.

 

This report is considering the Annual Review requirements of the DCP for the 2025-2026 period to ensure that the cost contribution amount is correctly adjusted to ensure the collection of sufficient funds to cover the costs of delivering the required infrastructure. The listed infrastructure is based on the recommendations of the Community Facility Plan and reflects the prioritisation of infrastructure established in the City’s Long Term Financial Plan and the Capital Works Program.

Detail

The DCP’s Cost Apportionment Schedule (CAS) has been revised to reflect the relevant infrastructure cost elements of the Annual Review, including:

 

·        Net Contributing Area;

·        Infrastructure Costs;

·        Land Acquisition Valuation;

·        Administration Costs;

·        Cost Contribution; and

·        Prioritisation of Facility Provision.

 

The revised cost elements are depicted in the CAS within the Alkimos Eglinton DCP Report (refer CAS in Attachment 2):

 

Net Contributing Area (NCA)

 

The amount of NCA in the DCP has reduced from the previous year from 475.52 hectares to 424.11 hectares. Approximately 51.41 hectares of Alkimos-Eglinton DCP area (NCA) was developed in the past financial year (2024-2025) with a total of $9,208,177.20 of developer contributions received (including interest, less Administration and consultancy costs).

 

Five-Year Fundamental Review

 

The City prepared a CFP in 2012 (revised 2020), which identifies the community facilities required to service the future community within the Northern Coastal Growth Corridor (NCGC). The 5-year fundamental review of the CFP was recently commissioned by the City to comply with the requirements of DPS No. 2 and to inform the City’s overall DCP requirements. The final recommendations of the CFP Review will be presented to Council for approval in due course after advertising. Once the final revision of the CFP is adopted by Council, the next annual review (2026/2027) will reflect the findings of the CFP and will update facility delivery timeframes and cost estimates accordingly.

 

Infrastructure Costs

 

The cost of the DCP infrastructure is reviewed and independently verified each year. The City engaged an external quantity surveyor, Donald Cant Watts Corke (DCWC) to prepare a revised cost estimate for the facilities up to June 2026 (refer Attachment 2).

 

The net recommended cost estimates for all infrastructure items have increased since the last annual review from $121,985,803 to $131,526,072, representing a 7.82% cost increase. The increase primarily relates to an escalation/indexation of costs recommended by the quantity surveyor to reflect the current market conditions and a minor increase in land valuation costs.

 

Land Acquisition Valuation

 

The estimated land acquisition costs have been updated and are included in the revised facility cost estimates. The land valuation was completed in accordance with the requirements of DPS No.2, which requires the local government to appoint a licensed valuer.

 

The previous 2024-2025 Annual Review prepared by previously engaged land valuers, JLL, proposed an average land valuation of $268.75/m² for the Alkimos and Eglinton library and community centre sites. Australian Property Consultants (APC) prepared the 2025-2026 revised land valuations on 16 July 2025 and proposes a land valuation of $287.50/m² (6.98% increase).

 

Regarding the indoor recreation centres in Alkimos and Eglinton, in 2024-2025, JLL proposed an average land valuation of $250/m². APC proposes a current revised land valuation of $266.67/m² (6.67% increase) in 2025-2026.

 

The below table outlines APC’s land valuation recommendations for each district facility:

 

Facility	Land value (per hectare)
Alkimos:
Library Site	$2,300,000 (287.50/m2)
Community Centre Site	$2,300,000 (287.50/m2)
Indoor Recreation Centre Site	$4,000,000 (266.67m2)
Eglinton:
Library Site	$2,300,000 (287.50/m2)
Community Centre Site	$2,300,000 (287.50/m2)
Indoor Recreation Centre Site	$4,000,000 (266.67m2)

 

These costs form part of the overall cost estimates for each item of infrastructure (where land is required) and depicted in the total infrastructure cost for each item of infrastructure, as depicted in the CAS in Attachment 2.

 

Administration Costs

 

In accordance with Schedule 13 of DPS No.2, the following administration costs can be charged to the DCP.

 

·        Costs to prepare and administer the plan during the period of operation;

·        Costs to prepare and review estimates;

·        Costs to prepare the cost apportionment schedule;

·        Valuation costs; and

·        Costs to service loans established by the City to fund early provision of facilities.

Administration costs can vary each year. Historically, the DCP estimates $76,500 per annum. However, a total of $39,193 has been spent in the 2024-2025 financial year for Administration costs which is $37,307 less than the original budget.

To ensure the estimated costs are as economical and accurate as possible, it is recommended that the estimated Administration costs be reduced from $76,500 to $40,000 per annum. Reducing the estimated Administration costs to $40,000 per annum for the remaining operational period of the DCP from 1 July 2025 to 8 September 2039, equates to a total remaining Administration cost estimate of $560,000, thereby saving the DCP an estimated $511,000.

 

Cost Contribution

 

As a result of the increase of infrastructure cost estimates, the contribution rate has increased from $19.23 per square metre to $21.05 per square metre representing an increase of 9.46%.

Consultation

In accordance with DPS No.2, where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be increased, then the City will in writing invite comment for a period of not less than 28 days, prior to making any decision to increase the estimated costs. As the overall estimated costs have increased, advertising in accordance with the above is required.

 

The consultation period will provide landowners with the opportunity to comment on the recommendations of the Annual Review. The revised cost estimates will be circulated to major landowners and representatives in the Alkimos-Eglinton DCP for their comments.

Comment

The purpose of the Annual Review is to ensure that sufficient funds are collected from the DCP landowners to meet the cost of delivering the required infrastructure.

 

There is an overall increase in the total facility costs of $9,540,269 due to indexation of construction costs and land value. This increase translates into an increased contribution rate from $19.23 per square metre to $21.05 per square metre (an increase of $1.82 per square metre or 9.46%) due to an escalation/indexation of costs reflecting current market conditions and the remaining NCA.

 

The City is currently preparing the 5-year fundamental review of the CFP and expect the review to be presented to Council soon. Once the revised CFP is adopted by Council, the findings will inform the next annual review of costs (2026/2027).

 

The Annual Review is recommending various revised cost estimates for the specific infrastructure defined in DPS No.2 and has been included into the DCP Capital Expenditure Plan (CEP) depicted in Attachment 2. The infrastructure facility costs and timing for delivery is subject to change in future reviews and will be used to inform the City’s capital works programme, annual budgeting and the long-term financial plan.

 

Statutory Compliance

 

Under DPS No.2, the City must annually review the DCP. The Annual Review process, including consultation requirements, is outlined in DPS No.2. In line with this, landowners may object to the proposed cost contribution and request a review by an independent expert. If this does not result in the cost contribution being acceptable to the landowners, then landowners can request that the cost contribution be determined through a process of arbitration. A similar right exists for the process of determining the value of any land acquired through the DCP

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.1 - Develop to meet current need and future growth

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Chief Executive Officer	Manage

The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic Risk Registers. The Annual Review of the DCP assists in addressing the impacts of the strategic risk relating to Long Term Financial Planning as it ensures that appropriate budget monitoring, timing and provisions are considered. In addition, the strategic risk relating to Stakeholder Relationships applies as a key element in the DCP review process is maintaining effective engagement with relevant stakeholders

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The proposed revision of costs for the 2025-2026 period recommends an increase in the total costs by $9,540,269, from $121,985,803 in the 2024/2025 annual review to $131,526,072 in the 2025/2026 annual review and the associated contribution rate increasing from $19.23 per square metre to $21.05 per square metre.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       Pursuant to Clause 11.6 of Schedule 12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2            NOTIFIES affected landowners of the recommendations of the Annual Review and INVITES comment in writing from those landowners for a period of 28 days; and;

2.       ADVERTISES the revised Alkimos-Eglinton Development Contribution Plan cost estimates and Capital Expenditure Plan in accordance with Schedule 13 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 as outlined in Attachment 2, including:

a)      Developer Contribution Plan facility cost estimate of $131,526,072;

b)      Net contributing land area remaining is 424.11 hectares; and

c)      Cost per hectare is $210,516.62 ($21.05 per square metre).

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 - Alkimos-Eglinton DCA Map	21/318371
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - 2025-2026 Annual Review - Alkimos Eglinton Development Contribution Plan Report	25/297646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

File Ref:                                              31034 – 25/253283

Responsible Officer:                          Director Planning & Sustainability

Attachments:                                       2         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider the revised cost estimates as part of the 2025-2026 Annual Review for the Yanchep Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan (DCP) for Council’s consent to advertise.

Background

The Development Contribution Area (DCA) is shown on the DPS No.2 Map as Special Control Area – DCA2 (refer Attachment 1).

The Yanchep-Two Rocks DCP includes the following infrastructure to be funded and completed:

·        Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club;

·        Yanchep District Open Space (Splendid Park); and

·        Capricorn Coastal Node Facilities.

On 10 December 2024 (Report PS01-12/24), Council approved the Annual Review of Costs for the 2024-2025 Financial Year period and adopted the following:

a)      “Total infrastructure costs being $29,047,191 (net infrastructure cost is $26,781,858 excluding grants contribution);

b)      A cost per dwelling rate of $5,219.37;

c)      A total municipal portion of the net infrastructure costs being 33.75% or $8,924,297;”

In accordance with DPS2, the DCP has an operation period of 16 years and during this time period the City of Wanneroo (City) is required to review the various elements of the DCP at one and five year intervals as per the following:

 

Annually:

·        DCP cost estimates; DCP cost indexation; dwelling estimates and cost per dwelling.

 

Five Yearly:

·        Community Facility Plan (CFP) assumptions and recommendations; and full DCP review.

 

Detail

The Annual Review includes all costs to 30 June 2025 (audited expenditure) and the estimated remaining DCP costs, which only applies to the construction of Phase 2 of Capricorn Coastal Node Facility and the repayment of loans that were necessary to fund the early delivery of the District Open Space and Surf Lifesaving Club.

 

The Yanchep-Two Rocks DCP Report for 2025-2026 (refer Attachment 2) has been updated with the revised cost estimates and the associated Capital Expenditure Plan (CEP).

 

The revised estimated costs for the Capricorn Coastal Node Facility are depicted in the below table and Attachment 2, which includes the finalised expenditure for the other infrastructure items.

 

Facility	Status	2024/2025 Annual Review	2025/2026 Annual Review	Difference
Surf Life Saving Club, Yanchep Lagoon	Complete	$7,938,238	$7,938,238	$0
Public Open Space – Splendid Park	Complete	$17,499,313	$17,499,313	$0
Coastal Node Facilities, Capricorn Coastal Node	Phase 1 (completed)	$2,533,175.99	$2,533,175.99	$0
	Phase 2 (pending)	$1,076,464.01	$1,081,498.76	$5,035
TOTAL		$29,047,191	$29,052,226	$5,035 increase

 

Capricorn Coastal Node Facilities

 

The construction of the Coastal Node Facility is separated over 2 phases with Phase 1 completed in 2024/2025 which amounted to $2,533,175.99. Phase 2 is due for completion in 2025/2026 and estimated to be $1,081,498.76. The total amount over the two phases being $3,614,674.75.

 

Both phases are pre-funded by Capricorn Village Joint Venture (CVJV). Upon completion of the phase 2 works and verification of the expenditure by Administration, CVJV will be reimbursed from the DCP and municipal accounts.

 

Administration Costs

 

In accordance with DPS2, the following are proposed to be charged to the DCP:

 

·        Costs to prepare and administer the plan during the period of operation;

·        Costs to prepare and review estimates;

·        Costs to prepare the cost apportionment schedule;

·        Valuation costs; and

·        Costs to service loans established by Council to fund early provision of facilities.

In all previous annual reviews, Council has applied an estimate of $70,500 per annum for Administration costs. In the 2024-2025 period, actual Administration expenditure was $33,437 ($37,063 less than the original budget). This decrease in Administration costs is due to most Cell Works being delivered, thereby negating the need to engage external consultants to revise costings and a corresponding reduction in other related costs (e.g. staff salaries).

On this basis, Administration is recommending that the original Administration cost estimate of $70,500 be reduced to $40,000 per annum, which will reflect as a saving to the DCP. 

The Administration costs are applied to the estimated remaining operational period of the DCP (1 July 2025 to 8 September 2030), which equates to a remaining estimated cost of $207,671.23 (approximately 5.2 years), utilising a future estimate of Administration cost of $40,000 per annum.

It should be note that Administration costs are estimates only and the City will only charge the DCP for actual administration expenditure, which is reflected in the City’s Annual Financial Statements.

 

Forecast ID

 

Forecast ID is a modelling system that predicts the amount of lots to be created over the remaining operational period of the DCP. A recent review has recommended a significant increase in total predicted dwelling creation from 9,154 to 14,181 dwellings over the operational period.

 

In the 2024/2025 period, Forecast ID predicted 530 lots to be created in this financial year, however, 1,071 lots were created. Forecast ID predicts that the amount of lots to be created could increase to 1500 lots per year from 2026 onwards. This significant increase would translate into a reduction in the contribution rate, as a greater number of lots would be anticipated over the remaining DCP operating period (2030).

 

Notwithstanding the higher lot yield projected by Forecast ID, Administration recommends that the current rate of $5,219.37 per lot be retained as this represents a fair and equitable position for past and future developers and allow for the loans to be paid off sooner, thereby reducing interest and creating savings to the DCP landowners.

 

Retaining the rate will also future proof the DCP against any future down-turn in the property market and pursue the closure of this DCP.

Loans to fund Infrastructure

On behalf of the DCP, the City has progressively borrowed funds to the amount of approximately $13.5 million. These loans were required to fund the completion of the Yanchep Surf Lifesaving Club and the acquisition and development of Splendid Park (District Open Space). Borrowing was necessary due to the need for the facilities and delivery commitments between the DCP landowners and the City to provide the infrastructure at the earliest possible stage.

The interest costs have decreased from the previous annual review (2024-2025) from $5,280,971 to $3,930,762.76, which reflects the total remaining loan servicing cost for the life of the DCP. The decrease of the future interest cost is primarily due to interest payments made over the preceding year and minor fluctuations in the variable interest rate that applies to the borrowing.

The current DCP loan amount is $13,556,300 and by keeping the current rate of $5,219.37 per lot (assuming the Forecast ID is achieved), the loans could be paid off by 2028, which is 2 years earlier than the end of the operation period.

However, if the higher Forecast ID is applied and the contribution rate reduced to $2,057.41, then additional interest will accrue on the loans for a longer period, resulting in higher costs being applied to the DCP. Further, any reduction of the per lot rate will increase the risk to the City and the DCP that if the amount of actual lot creation falls short, the DCP rate may need to be significantly increased in the outer years; or loans not repaid within the operating period of the DCP.

Administration recommends retaining the per lot rate of $5,219.37 which will provide greater consistency for the landowners and enable Administration to prioritise the repayment of the DCP loans.

Cost Apportionment and Contribution Rates

The City’s contribution towards the total cost of facilities is based on the number of dwellings that existed prior to the creation of the DCP (3,089 dwellings) and expressed as a proportion of the total estimated dwellings over the operational period (2014-2030) of the DCP.

The recently revised estimates by Forecast ID significantly increased the anticipated dwelling yields in the DCP from 9,154 to 14,181 dwellings (Attachment 2). If applied in the annual review, this would translate to the City’s portion of the cost decreasing from 33.75% to 21.78% ($8,924,297 to $5,834,962) and the DCP contribution rate for remaining subdividers decreasing from $5,219.37 to $2,057.41 per dwelling (a decrease of $3,161.96 per dwelling or a 60.58% decrease). This is simply a consequence of more lots being introduced into the remaining operating period of the DCP for the remaining years.

Whilst there are obvious financial benefits to the City and future landowners in utilising the revised Forecast ID figures, the increased dwelling yields (and therefore income) in the later years cannot be guaranteed. Applying these yields to the annual review represents a risk to both the City and the DCP landowners that the DCP may not generate adequate contributions within a particular year to repay the current loan facility, fund the interest payments or make payment on the remaining infrastructure costs (phase 2 of the Capricorn Coastal Node Facilities).

 

Retention in the rates will provide consistency for the landowners, the City and ensure the timely conclusion of the DCP, whilst ensuring responsible financial management and minimising risk to the City and landowners in the DCP.

Consultation

In accordance with DPS2, the City’s review of estimated costs shall recommend that the estimated costs are to be maintained, reduced, or increased. Where the review of estimated costs recommends those costs be increased, then the City shall in writing invite comment for a period of not less than 28 days, prior to making any decision to increase the estimated costs. As the overall estimated costs have increased, advertising will be required.

 

Comment

 

Most infrastructure works defined in the DCP have been completed, including the Yanchep Surf Life Saving Club and Splendid Park. Phase 2 of the Capricorn Coastal Node is the only outstanding infrastructure item to be funded, which is scheduled to occur in 2025/2026.

 

A recent revision to the Forecast ID lots yields in the Yanchep-Two Rocks area predicts significantly higher lot yields occurring from 2026 onwards, with yields increasing from the original estimates of approximately 500 lots per year to 1500 lots per year. The consequence of such a significant increase in lot yield over the operational period of the DCP (2030) is that if the methodology in DPS No.2 is strictly applied to the calculation of the contribution rate, it would reduce it from $5,219.37 to $2,057.41. If this occurs, then interest will continue to accrue on the variable interest loans, as it will be paid off slower and higher costs will be incurred by the DCP.

 

Additionally, the inclusion of this additional yield into this DCP operation period would reduce the lot yield catchment for a future DCP for Yanchep-Two Rocks, potentially resulting in a higher per lot cost for the future DCP and delaying additional community infrastructure for the Yanchep-Two Rocks area.

 

With the review of the Yanchep Two Rocks CFP underway and the finalisation of this DCP quickly approaching, Administration will start to consider the preparation of a new DCP in this area and will engage with Elected members as part of the process.

 

Administration is recommending retaining the rate at $5,219.37 per dwelling which is the same approach that was adopted by Council in the 2024/2025 annual review.

 

Due to most works being delivered, there is no longer a need to hire external consultants to revise costings annually. As this is no longer an expense, this saves on Administration costs. This is evident with only $33,437 spent in 2024/2025 in lieu of a budget of $70,500 for the year. Administration is recommending that Administration costs be reduced to $40,000 per annum until the closure of the DCP.

Statutory Compliance

The City must annually review the cost estimates of the DCP, including consultation requirements, as outlined in DPS2. Landowners may object to the amount of a cost contribution and request a review by an independent expert. If this does not result in the cost contribution being acceptable to the landowners, then landowners can request that the cost contribution be determined through a process of arbitration. A similar right exists for the process of determining the value of any land acquired by the DCP.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.1 - Develop to meet current need and future growth

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-G09 Long Term Financial Plan	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Chief Executive Officer	Manage

 

The above risks relating to the issue contained within this report have been identified and considered within the City’s Strategic/Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to mitigate this risk to support existing management systems.

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The apportionment of cost is revised annually to reflect the cost sharing methodology between the City and the DCP. In this regard, the cost apportionment relates to the total lot yield estimate, which has increased from 9154 lots to 14,181 lots and results in a decrease in the City’s proportion of the facility costs from $8,924,297 to $5,834,962 and a corresponding increase in the DCP apportionment from $17,521,971 to $20,951,931.

 

·        Existing community / City contribution     -       21.78% of total DCP Cost (3,089 lots)

·        New growth / development contribution   -    78.22% of total DCP Cost (11,092 lots)

 

Noting the above findings in the annual review, Administration has recommended a responsible financial management position be applied to the DCP by retaining the City’s current cost apportionment from 33.75% ($8,924,297) and DCP contribution rate of $5.219.37.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       ENDORSES the revised Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan cost estimates in accordance with Schedule 12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 as outlined in Attachment 2 to increase in the total infrastructure costs from $29,047,191 to $29,052,226 (net infrastructure cost is $26,786,893 excluding grants contribution);

2.       ENDORSES the Yanchep-Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan Report as depicted in Attachment 2 subject to the following;

a)      Retain the cost per dwelling rate of $5,219.37; and

b)      Retain the municipal apportionment of 33.75% and apply this to the revised cost estimate of $26,786,893 (excluding grants).

3.       Pursuant to Clause 11.6 of Schedule 12 of District Planning Scheme No. 2 NOTIFIES affected landowners of the recommendations of the Annual Review and INVITES comment in writing from those landowners for a period of 28 days.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 - Yanchep -Two Rocks DCA	21/317855
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - Yanchep Two Rocks Development Contribution Plan Report 2025-2026	25/291061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approval Services

File Ref:                                              50968 – 25/218373

Responsible Officer:                          Director Planning & Sustainability

Attachments:                                       8  

Previous Items:                                   PS05-11/24 - Preparation of Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Normalisation of Land in the Lots 1001 and 1002 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 60 and Agora Village - Trinity at Alkimos Pt Lot 9005 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Centre Structure Plan No. 86 Areas - Ordinary Council - 12 Nov 2024 6:00pm      

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Since Administration drafted this report, the Western Australian Planning Commission has granted approval for the City’s Agora Village – Trinity at Alkimos Pt Lot 9005 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 86 to remain in effect until 19 October 2026.

Issue

For Council to consider:

 

·        Amendment No. 227 to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) following a public advertising period; and

·        Requesting the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) perform consequential administrative actions to the following local structure plans:

o   Amending the City’s Lots 1001 and 1002 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 60 (ASP 60); and

o   Revoking the City’s Agora Village – Trinity at Alkimos Pt Lot 9005 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 86 (ASP 86).

Background

Amendment No. 227 applies to land within the Alkimos locality where ASP 60 currently guides subdivision and development (subject area). ASP 60 was initially adopted in November 2009 by the WAPC. The ASP 60 structure plan map is included as Attachment 1.

 

There is also a further ‘centre’ structure plan within the subject area – being ASP 86 as mentioned above. The area subject to ASP 86 (Agora Village) is the area identified as a Centre Zone on the ‘Agreed Structure Plan Map 60 (Zoning)’ map in Attachment 1. The Agora Village contains commercial development at its core (located on the corner of Santorini Promenade and Benenden Avenue, Alkimos), which includes small-scale shops, restaurant and office. Surrounding the commercial development, the Agora Village provides for medium-density residential development and a childcare centre.

 

The subject area is largely zoned Urban Development under DPS2 (Attachment 2), an interim zoning applied to areas undergoing subdivision and development. Much of the subject area is built out, meaning the subdivision and development of the built-out areas no longer require the guidance of a structure plan. Therefore, it is necessary to now move planning controls for these built out areas out of structure plans and into DPS2 (through Amendment No. 227). As detailed in this report, the zoning, density codings and reservations to be put into DPS2 through Amendment No. 227 correspond with what has been developed in the subject area, as guided by the structure plans mentioned above.

 

This process of normalising structure planned areas is part of the City’s ongoing approach to simplify the planning system and reduce complexity for the City’s stakeholders. Normalisation makes it simpler for landowners to understand the relevant planning controls for their property by reducing the number of planning documents relevant to the decision-making process. This aligns with the City’s goal to provide for well-planned land uses to support the economy, the growing community and environment.

 

Council initiated Amendment No. 227 on 12 November 2024 (PS05-11/24), as outlined in Attachment 3. In initiating Amendment No. 227, it was envisaged that much of the subject area would be rezoned under DPS2 – which would precede amendments to ASP 60 and result in ASP 86 being made redundant.

Detail

Amendment No. 227 proposes the following zoning changes to the DPS2 map (refer Attachment 4):

 

Residential Areas

·        Rezoning established residential lots from Urban Development to Residential, with density codes that generally reflect those agreed by the WAPC, as outlined in a Consolidated R-Code Plan provided in Attachment 5.

 

Commercial Centres

·        Rezoning various lots with established commercial development (shopping centres, fast food and service stations) from Urban Development to Commercial.

·        Land subject to Commercial rezoning to have density codings consistent with the relevant structure plans, or what was agreed by the WAPC through subdivision.

 

Mixed Use site

·        Rezoning the vacant Lot 1831 (2) Trethowan Promenade, Alkimos (approved for child care premise) from Urban Development to Mixed Use.

 

Local Scheme Reserves

·        Reclassifying public open space, conservation, road reserves, and utility sites as Local Scheme Reserves.

 

Portion Santorini Promenade Road Reserve

·        The rezoning of a portion of the Santorini Promenade road reserve from ‘Local Scheme Reserve – Local Road’ to Urban Development, located where shown in Attachment 6.

·        This portion of road reserve is subject to a permanent closure request, which Council has already supported in principle at its 13 August 2024 meeting (CS04-08/24).

 

Alkimos College Site

·        Removing the ‘Public Purposes’ local scheme reserve over Lot 2018 (101) Santorini Promenade, Alkimos (Alkimos College site), recognising that the land is already reserved for ‘Public Purposes’ under the Metropolitan Region Scheme.

 

Amendment No. 227 does not significantly impact land parcels which are still pending or earmarked for further subdivision. No Scheme text changes are proposed through this amendment.

 

As discussed in the Consultation section below, the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) advised Administration on 23 May 2025 that Amendment No. 227 was approved for advertising. Prior to that approval being granted, the DPLH required the City to make modifications to the Amendment No. 227 proposal as it was initiated by Council on 12 November 2024 (PS05-11/24).

 

Attachment 4 provides the advertised version of Amendment No. 227 – whilst incorporating track changes to demonstrate the modifications required prior to advertising.

 

Administrative Amendments to affected Local Structure Plan

 

Regulation 35A of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations) allows the City to pursue amendments to structure plans through the Scheme amendment process. Through the Regulations, amendments to structure plans are required to be outlined in a ‘Regulation 35A Statement’, accompanying a Scheme amendment.

 

Attachment 7 provides the Regulation 35A Statement previously resolved by Council outlining the extent of amendments to the ASP 60 text and maps to coincide with the Scheme changes occurring through Amendment No. 227. The DPLH also required modifications to the Regulation 35A Statement before advertising, which are outlined as track changes in Attachment 7.

 

The Regulation 35A Statement also outlined that Amendment No. 227 would not affect ASP 86. As discussed further in the Comment section below, ASP 86 will be redundant following the approval of Amendment No. 227, and therefore the City (Council) should now formally request the WAPC for its revocation.

Consultation

Following Council’s 12 November 2024 resolution, Amendment No. 227 was:

 

·        Referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for assessment, which confirmed on 26 November 2024 that a formal assessment under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 was not required.

·        Approved for public advertising by DPLH on 23 May 2025, following modifications (refer Attachment 4 and Attachment 7).

·        Advertised from 5 June to 18 July 2025, including:

o   Notices on the City’s website;

o   Copies made available for public inspection at the City’s Civic Centre;

o   Notice in the 5 June 2025 edition of the Perth Now – Wanneroo newspaper; and

o   Direct letters to affected landowners and occupiers.

Administration received seven submissions during the advertising period. Of the submissions received:

 

·        Five were from government agencies expressing ‘no objection’ to the proposal;

·        One was from a planning consultant (representing a developer) providing comments on various aspects of the proposal; and

·        One was from a local landowner objecting to the density coding the proposal assigns to their lot. A discussion on the objection received – pertaining to proposed density codings of select lots subject to the amendment – is discussed in the Comment section below.

 

A summary of all the submissions received, and Administration’s responses, is provided in Attachment 8.

Comment

Density Coding of Residential Lots on Bewdley Way and Potton Rise, Alkimos

 

During the advertising process, Administration received a submission of a landowner of a residential lot on Bewdley Way, Alkimos. This landowner objected to the R20 density coding being applied for their lot through Amendment No. 227, as it had been represented by an R25 density coding on a publicly available Consolidated R-Code Plan.

 

The submitter is correct in that their lot (as well as 13 other lots on Bewdley Way and Potton Rise, Alkimos) was previously identified as R25 on the Consolidated R-Code Plan. However, the density coding detail for those lots as shown on that plan was inaccurate, as the WAPC had approved an R20 coding at the subdivision stage. Based on what the WAPC had approved, Amendment No. 227 proposes an R20 coding for these 14 lots.

 

The Consolidated R-Code Plan is not statutory or forms part of the structure plans. Rather, the plan consolidates the density codings approved by the WAPC through its consideration of subdivision proposals. On investigation, Administration cannot establish how the Consolidated R-Code Plan came into error. It was only identified during the preparation of Amendment No. 227 that the error on the Consolidated R-Code Plan was identified. Administration has recently arranged to have the Consolidated R-Code Plan corrected, with the correct detail shown in Attachment 5.

 

The lots in question (including the submitter’s) are between 445m² and 450m². The submitter has argued that the lot size meets minimum requirements for subdivision, development of a grouped dwelling or granny flat (ancillary dwelling) if the lots were coded R25. Administration does not agree with this statement, as the average site area for each lot or dwelling developed on R25 land is 350m². This means at least 700m² of land is needed for two dwellings to be considered. Ancillary dwelling can already be considered on either R20 or R25 lots regardless of lot size, provided that all other relevant provisions of the Residential Design Codes were satisfied.

 

The submitter had also requested the City consider modifying Amendment No. 227 to apply an R30 coding over their lot. Increasing the density coding would still not change the subdivision and development potential of the subject lots. In any event, such a modification would not be aligned with the purpose of Amendment No. 227, which is to transfer and consolidate provisions within the existing planning framework into DPS 2 relative to the subject area.

 

In light of the above, Administration does not recommend this modification be supported.

 

Structure Plan Approval Periods

 

Under Clause 28 of the deemed provisions, structure plans have a default lifespan of 10 years, unless a different timeframe is set by the WAPC. For structure plans approved before 19 October 2015 (such as ASP 60 and ASP 86), the 10-year period is considered to have commenced on 19 October 2015.

 

A request to the WAPC was previously made by the developers of the Trinity Estate to extend the ASP 60 approval period to 19 October 2030. The WAPC granted this request and has formally extended the ASP 60 duration period. Contrary to comments received in a submission received during advertising, the WAPC’s approval duration extension for ASP 60 was referred to in the public documentation released.

 

The Regulation 35A Statement as endorsed by Council at its 12 November 2024 meeting made the following assertions regarding ASP 86:”

 

·        "The approval of ASP 86 will not be affected.

·        Zoning, local scheme reserves and residential density codings from ASP 86 will also be placed into DPS2 through Amendment No. 227. This structure plan will not be amended through this proposal; but rather be left to expire on 19 October 2025.”

 

However, since Amendment No. 227 was initiated in November 2024, Administration no longer considers it appropriate to leave ASP 86 to expire as initially planned.

 

Amendment No. 227 proposes to normalise the zoning of the entire ASP 86 area, with the structure plan being made redundant once Amendment No. 227 was approved. This would have meant that ASP 86 could have been allowed to expire in October 2025 without any consequence if the Scheme amendment was approved before that date.

 

Given the extensive delays in the DPLH granting its consent to advertise, Amendment No. 227 will not be approved by the Minister before October 2025. This means that should ASP 86 expire without Amendment No. 227 being approved (as initially intended), there would be consequences for the City in administering the planning framework over land affected by that structure plan.

 

To avoid such consequences, the City has already requested the WAPC to consider granting a one-year extension to the ASP 86 approval period – to 19 October 2026. This should provide sufficient time for Amendment No. 227 to be processed and considered by the Minister. This request is currently being considered by the WAPC.

 

The Regulation 35A Statement in Attachment 7 details modifications (as track changes) that remove reference to ASP 86 being left to expire in October 2025. It is then recommended that Council instead request the WAPC consider revoking structure plans under Clause 28(3) of the deemed provisions; as ASP 86 will be redundant and no longer required once Amendment No. 227 is approved.

A submitter identified that the main parts of the Scheme Amendment reporting released for advertising did not mention Administration’s the ASP 86 approval extension request made to the WAPC. Whilst this is correct, Administration also released an addendum to the Scheme Amendment reporting that detailed matters arising after Council’s initiation of Amendment No. 227, including the extension request sought for ASP 86.

Statutory Compliance

Amendment No. 227 to DPS2 can be processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

Following the Minister for Planning’s approval of Amendment No. 227, the WAPC can revoke and amend the structure plans that apply over the Amendment No. 227 area pursuant to the deemed provisions for local planning schemes, provided in Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.2 - Plan for and manage land use

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-O15 – Project Management	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

The above risk relating to the issues contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate risk register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.

Policy Implications

Amendment No. 227 is being processed noting the WAPC-prepared ‘WA Planning Manual: Guidance for Structure Plans’ in respect to the relationship between structure plans and local planning schemes.

Financial Implications

Costs in preparing Amendment No. 227 to DPS2 – and assisting the WAPC in revoking ASP 86 and amending ASP 60 – can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       Pursuant to Regulation 50(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, CONSIDERS the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, as summarised with Administration’s responses in Attachment 8;

2.       Pursuant to Regulation 50(3)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUPPORTS Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, as advertised and as outlined in Attachment 4;

3.       AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy;

4.       Pursuant to Regulation 53(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, PROVIDES Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission;

5.       REQUESTS the Western Australian Planning Commission after the Minister for Planning approves Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to:

a)      Amend the City of Wanneroo’s Lots 1001 and 1002 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 60, pursuant to the modified Statement prepared under Regulation 35A of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 in Attachment 7; and

b)      Revoke the City of Wanneroo’s Agora Village – Trinity at Alkimos Pt Lot 9005 Marmion Avenue, Alkimos Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 86, pursuant to Clause 28(3) of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes contained in Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and

6.       REQUESTS Administration advise the submitters of this decision.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 - Structure Plan Maps - Agreed Structure Plan No. 60	24/349641
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - Scheme Map Extract - Supporting Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	24/358295
3⇩.	Attachment 3 - Council Resolution PS05-11/24 – 12 November 2024 - Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/275484
4⇩.	Attachment 4 - Scheme Amendment Proposal for Advertising (Including Track Changes) - Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/276224
5⇩.	Attachment 5 - Consolidated R-Code Plan - ASP No. 60, Alkimos - Notated for Amendment No. 227 Council Report	25/283457
6⇩.	Attachment 6 - Proposed Road Closure, Land Amalgamation and Subdivision Plan - Portion Santorini Promenade Alkimos -Diversion Road	24/358379
7⇩.	Attachment 7 - Track Changed Regulation 35A Statement For Advertising - Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/276556
8⇩.	Attachment 8 - Council Submission Schedule - Amendment No. 227 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/283783

 

 

 

 

           

 

File Ref:                                              49919 – 25/281701

Responsible Officer:                          Director Planning & Sustainability

Attachments:                                       6  

Previous Items:                                   PS03-08/24 - Preparation of Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 - Normalisation of Land in the East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Agreed Local Structure Plan No. 57 Area - Ordinary Council - 13 Aug 2024 6:00pm      

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

For Council to consider:

 

·        Amendment No. 221 to the City’s District Planning Scheme No. 2 (DPS2) following a public advertising period; and

·        Requesting the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) perform consequential amendments to the City’s East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Local Structure Plan No. 57 (ASP 57).

Background

The land subject of proposed Amendment No. 221 to DPS2 (Amendment No. 221) is located in the eastern part of the Landsdale locality (also known informally as East Landsdale). Amendment No. 221 affects land over a 220-hectare area in which ASP 57 currently applies (subject area). ASP 57 was initially approved by the WAPC on 30 November 2015, with the current ASP 57 structure plan maps included as Attachment 1.

 

The subject area is largely zoned Urban Development under DPS2 (refer Attachment 2), an interim zoning applied to areas undergoing subdivision and development. Much of the subject area is built out, meaning the subdivision and development of the built-out areas no longer require the guidance of a structure plan. Therefore, it is necessary to now move planning controls for these built out areas out of ASP 57 and into DPS2 (through Amendment No. 221). As detailed in this report, the zoning, density codings and reservations to be put into DPS2 through Amendment No. 221 correspond with what has been developed in the subject area, as guided by ASP 57.

 

The entire subject area is also affected by Special Control Area (SCA) provisions provided in Schedule 18 of DPS 2. The purpose of the Special Control Area provisions is to reduce the risk of radio frequency emissions and interference on the Perth International Telecommunications Centre (PITC), located to the east of the subject area. Amendment No. 221 is proposing only minor changes to the SCA provisions.

 

This process of normalising structure planned areas is part of the City’s ongoing approach to simplify the planning system and reduce complexity for the City’s stakeholders.

Normalisation makes it simpler for landowners to understand the relevant planning controls for their property by reducing the number of planning documents relevant to the decision-making process. This aligns with the City’s goal to provide for well-planned land uses to support the economy, the growing community and environment.

 

Council initiated Amendment No. 221 on 13 August 2024 (PS03-08/24), as outlined in Attachment 3.

Detail

Amendment No. 221 proposes the following zoning changes to the DPS2 map and text (refer Attachment 4):

 

·           Rezoning established residential lots from Urban Development to Residential – with density codings taken from ASP 57, local development plans and what was approved by the WAPC through subdivision.

·           The reclassifying of public open spaces, drainage and public utility sites in the subject area from Urban Development zone to the corresponding Local Scheme Reserve.

·           Reclassifying road reserves within the Urban Development Zone in the subject area to ‘Local Scheme Reserve – Local Road’.

·           The rezoning of the private Landsdale Christian School site at Lot 70 (77) Queensway Road, Landsdale from Urban Development to Private Community Purpose (R20) Zone.

·           The deletion of Additional Use area A7 from the DPS 2 text and maps. The Additional Use area is now redundant, as it permits a Garden Centre use over land which has since been fully subdivided into residential lots.

·           Minor amendments to the text relating to Special Control Areas in Schedule 18 of DPS2 – to update references to legislation, as well as to transfer land use permissibility provisions out of ASP 57.

 

Amendment No. 221 will retain the Urban Development zoning over various larger land parcels across the subject area, where the following circumstances apply:

 

·        Where a lot is completely vacant, with no residence or other land use being carried out;

·        On larger lots with dwellings or other development where future subdivision will likely provide additional local roads; or

·        For Lot 154 (365) Landsdale Road and Lot 155 (385) Alexander Drive, Landsdale – which is earmarked for a neighbourhood centre and community purposes under ASP 57.

 

As discussed in the Consultation section below, the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) advised Administration on 5 June 2025 that Amendment No. 221 was approved for advertising. Prior to that approval being granted, the DPLH required the City to make modifications to the Amendment No. 221 proposal as it was initiated by Council on 13 August 2024 (PS03-08/24).

 

Attachment 4 provides the advertised version of Amendment No. 221 – whilst incorporating track changes to demonstrate modifications required prior to advertising.

 

Administrative Amendments to affected Local Structure Plans

 

Regulation 35A of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 (Regulations) allows the City to pursue amendments to structure plans through the Scheme amendment process. Through the Regulations, amendments to structure plans are required to be outlined in a ‘Regulation 35A Statement’, accompanying a Scheme amendment.

 

Attachment 5 provides the Regulation 35A Statement that was prepared to coincide with Amendment No. 221. Amendments to ASP 57, as detailed in the Regulation 35A Statement, outline the consequential changes to the structure plan text and maps.

 

The DPLH also required modifications to the Regulation 35A Statement before advertising, which are also outlined as track changes in Attachment 5.

Consultation

Following Council’s 13 August 2024 resolution, Amendment No. 221 was:

 

·        Referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for assessment, which confirmed on 4 September 2024 that a formal assessment under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 was not required;

·        Approved for public advertising by the DPLH (on behalf of the Minister for Planning) on 5 June 2025, following modifications, as detailed in Attachment 4; and

·        Advertised from 19 June to 1 August 2025, including:

o    Notices on the City’s website;

o    Copies made available for public inspection at the City’s Civic Centre;

o    Notices in the 8 May 2025 edition of the Perth Now – Wanneroo newspaper; and

o    Direct correspondence to the most affected landowners and occupiers – as well as representatives from the PITC.

 

Administration received four submissions during the advertising period. Of the submissions received:

 

·        Three were from government agencies expressing ‘no objection’ to the proposal – as well as providing general comment; and

·        One detailed submission was received from representatives of the PITC. The full submission has been circulated to Council Members under separate cover. A discussion of a key issue raised in that submission is provided in the Comment section below.

 

A summary of all the submissions received, and Administration’s responses, is provided in Attachment 6.

Comment

Perth International Telecommunications Centre Submission

 

The entire subject area is subject to Special Control Area (SCA) provisions provided in Schedule 18 of DPS 2. The purpose of the Special Control Area provisions is to reduce the risk of radio frequency emissions and interference on the PITC. Therefore, Administration considered it crucial to engage with the PITC (or their representatives) during the advertising of Amendment No. 221.

 

The submission provides extensive detail about how radio frequency interference (RFI) impacts the operations of the PITC. One source of RFI includes electronic appliances and devices used in homes located in the subject area.

 

The submission from the PITC does not oppose most aspects of the Amendment No. 221 proposal, except for the imposing of the R30 density coding over select lots. The PITC provides broad reasonings for this position, as detailed in their submission and in Attachment 6. The submission could be condensed to an argument that all residential lots in the subject area should be coded R20 as a precautionary approach to limiting the risk of RFI to the PITC.

 

There are already SCA provisions in DPS2 that require a minimum average site area of 500m² to be achieved for subdivision or development. ASP 57 also has similar provisions, with the structure plan maps assigning an R20/R30 coding across the subject area.

The ASP 57 text details that a baseline R20 coding applies, but R30 may be provided in proximity to centres, public open space or bus routes. The allocation of R20 or R30 codings over residential lots is then considered and agreed by the WAPC through subdivision.

 

The purpose of Amendment No. 221 is to normalise the zoning of established parts of the land affected by ASP 57. Consistent with that purpose, Amendment No. 221 proposes to apply either an R20 or R30 density coding over residential lots in the subject area. The application of the density codings is mostly consistent with decisions the WAPC has made at subdivision.

 

In Administration’s opinion, applying R20 over all residential lots in the entire subject area now (as sought by the PITC) will not achieve much from a planning perspective for the following reasons:

 

·        To date, there have been 2,347 lots created in the subject area – most of which are now occupied by family-sized dwellings. Over the undeveloped land, Administration is only expecting the further creation of approximately 240 lots in the subject area – which the planning framework already requires to be delivered to an average minimum size of 500m²; and

·        As the subject area has established itself only over the last 15 years, it is unlikely that there would be a drive for redevelopment or an increase of density over the subject area in the foreseeable future. If in the unlikely event there was a drive for this to occur, this would be prevented by existing SCA provisions in DPS2 that control lot sizes. A change or removal of SCA provisions would require a further amendment to DPS2, which the PITC would be able to comment on.

 

Given that Amendment No. 221 seeks to normalise the zoning and density coding of development that has already occurred, Administration recommends that Council support the proposal as advertised and without modification.

 

Extension of ASP 57 Approval Period

 

Under Clause 28 of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes (deemed provisions), contained in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, structure plans have a default lifespan of ten years, unless a different timeframe is set by the WAPC. For ASP 57, the ten-year period is considered to have commenced on the day of its approval, being 30 November 2015.

 

While the deemed provisions and the WA Planning Manual: Guidance for Structure Plans allow extensions for structure plans to be considered. However, only the WAPC has the authority to make a decision to extend a structure plan approval period. The City's role is limited to providing advice and administrative support.

 

In the initiation report (PS03-08/24), Administration advised that an approval period extension for ASP 57 to 30 June 2033 should be considered after public advertising of Amendment No. 221. However, to prevent potential planning issues that could arise if structure plans expire before the relevant land is normalised, Administration submitted this approval extension request for ASP 57 to the WAPC on behalf of the City. On 15 May 2025, the WAPC extended the approval period for ASP 57, however only to 8 December 2030. In the coming years Administration will apply for a further extension to the ASP 57 approval duration if needed.

Statutory Compliance

Amendment No. 221 to DPS2 can be processed in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

 

Following the Minister for Planning’s approval of Amendment No. 221, the WAPC will amend the East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Local Structure Plan No. 57 pursuant to Clause 29A of the deemed provisions for local planning schemes, provided in Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. This can occur as Council resolved to include a Statement in the amendment to that effect, pursuant to Regulation 35A of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.2 - Plan for and manage land use

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-O15 – Project Management	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

The above risks relating to the issues contained within this report has been identified and considered within the City’s Corporate Risk Register. Action plans have been developed to manage this risk to support existing management systems.

Policy Implications

Amendment No. 221 is being processed noting the WAPC-prepared ‘WA Planning Manual: Guidance for Structure Plans’ in respect to the relationship between structure plans and local planning schemes.

Financial Implications

Costs in preparing Amendment No. 221 to DPS2 – and assisting the WAPC in amending ASP 57 – can be met from the current Planning and Sustainability operational budget.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.         Pursuant to Regulation 50(2) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, CONSIDERS the submissions received in respect of Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, as summarised with Administration’s responses in Attachment 6;

2.         Pursuant to Regulation 50(3)(a) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, SUPPORTS Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, as advertised and provided in Attachment 4;

3.         AUTHORISES the Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer to SIGN and SEAL Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 documents in accordance with the City’s Execution of Documents Policy;

4.         Pursuant to Regulation 53(1) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, PROVIDES Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2 to the Western Australian Planning Commission;

5.         REQUESTS the Western Australian Planning Commission undertake amendments to East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Local Structure Plan No. 57 after the Minister for Planning approves Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2, pursuant to the Statement prepared under Regulation 35A of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, as provided in Attachment 5; and

6.         REQUESTS Administration advise the submitters of this decision.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 - Current Structure Plan Maps - East Wanneroo Cell 9 (East Landsdale) Local Structure Plan No. 57	24/184631
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - Scheme Map Extract Over East Landsdale - To Support Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	24/237478
3⇩.	Attachment 3 - Council Resolution PS03-08/24 – 13 August 2024 - Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/288673
4⇩.	Attachment 4 - Scheme Amendment Proposal - Including Changes Required by Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage for Advertising - Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/289089
5⇩.	Attachment 5 - Regulation 35A Statement - Modified as Required by Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage - Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/289404
6⇩.	Attachment 6 - Council Submission Schedule - Amendment No. 221 to District Planning Scheme No. 2	25/292326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 September, 2025                                                1

 

Assets

Asset Operations & Services

File Ref:                                              51737 – 25/201955

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       4         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

The date of the Kemp Street Traffic Management Scheme has been amended under the Detail section from 2926/27 to 2026/27.

 

The Council Resolution dated 8/10/2024 has been noted under the Detail section in reference to the Kemp Street score inclusion in the 2025/26 Capital Works Program.

Issue

To consider projects submitted for funding through the 2026/2027 State and Federal Government Accident Black Spot Programs.

Background

The State and Australian Federal Governments have both committed to reductions in casualty crashes on Australian roads through Accident Black Spot Programs. These programs are primarily reactive and target road locations where crashes have occurred, although some allowance is made for proactive applications supported by a formal Road Safety Inspection (RSI).

Detail

An invitation for submissions for the 2026/2027 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs was issued by Main Roads WA (MRWA) in April 2025, with a closing date of 11 July 2025. To assist with the preparation of submissions, the MRWA Crash Map portal provides annual crash data for a five-year period. The most recent crash data extends from January 2020 to December 2024. The crash data is supplied to MRWA by the WA Police and the Insurance Council of Australia

 

The Black Spot Program Development and Management Guidelines require Black Spot projects based on crash data to meet a minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) to ensure the proposed remedial works are cost effective. The BCR is the ratio of the benefit to the community of the expected reduction in crashes versus the cost of the proposed remedial treatment.

 

Successful State Government Black Spot projects are funded two-thirds by the Program and one-third by local government and are based on all recorded crashes, fatalities, casualties and property damage. The criteria for the program are as follows:

 

·        For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is 5 crashes over a five-year period;

·        For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is average of 2 crashes per kilometre per five-year period;

·        Value of works between $2,000 and $3,000,000;

·        Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 1.0; and

·        Maximum delivery over 2 financial years with the ability to request one (1) 12-month extension over the duration of the project.

 

Successful Australian Federal Government Black Spot projects are fully funded by the Program and are based on casualty crashes, fatalities or personal injury. The criteria for the program are as follows:

 

·        For intersections, mid-block or short road sections (<3kms), the crash criterion is three casualty crashes over the five-year period;

·        For road lengths (>3kms), the crash criterion is 0.2 casualty crashes per kilometre over the five-year period;

·        Value of works up to $3,000,000;

·        Minimum Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = 2.0; and

·        Maximum delivery over 1 single financial year with the ability to request one (1) 12-month extension over the duration of the project.

Administration has investigated the qualifying crash locations for both programs to determine the appropriate remedial treatments and associated costs. Dependent on the proposed treatment, cost and the resultant BCR, projects are nominated for either or both the State and Australian Government Black Spot programs.

Alternatively, another option to secure funding is available through a supporting Road Safety Inspection for projects where the minimum crash criterion is met, but the cost of an appropriate submission may not return a BCR > 1.0.

It is anticipated that the Metropolitan Regional Road Group (MRRG) will assess nominations between July and October 2025 and the Minister for Transport is anticipated to announce the approved projects by June 2026.

The projects submitted to MRWA for funding consideration by the 11 July 2025 deadline, including their traffic/road safety issues and proposed remedial treatments, are as follows:

 

1.       Kemp Street from Archer Street to Lenore Road, Pearsall -Traffic Management Scheme (Attachment 1)

Kemp Street is classified as a Local Distributor Road according to the Main Roads Road Hierarchy, accommodating approximately 3,000 vehicles daily. The road is designed as a two-lane undivided roadway with an average carriageway width of 7.3 meters. A 2.5-meter concrete pathway is located along the northern verge between Archer Street and Lenore Road. A Transperth Bus Service operates along Kemp Street between Archer Street and Brooklyn Avenue, featuring two bus stops in each direction. The surrounding environment predominantly consists of residential developments. The 85th percentile (operating) speed on this road ranges from 56 to 61 km/h. Analysis of five years of crash data reveals a total of two reported incidents between Archer Street and Lenore Road, with one resulting in hospitalization and the other requiring medical attention. Kemp Street receives a score of 28 when evaluated using the City of Wanneroo’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy. Additionally, Kemp Street is included in the 2025/26 Capital Works Program for preparing the detailed engineering design with construction scheduled in 2026/27, as per the council resolution dated 8/10/2024, that Council:

 

“LISTS a project for the design and construction of a suitable traffic management scheme for Council’s consideration in the draft 2025/26 Capital Works Program as part of the Long Term Financial Plan review currently in progress”.

 

Treatment

 

The proposed solution includes five intersection plateaux, and five midblock humps designed to lower vehicle speeds and lessen crash severity, while also discouraging reckless driving behaviour. This, in turn, will contribute to a safer roadway. The estimated cost for these improvements is $813,991 An application for a Road Safety Inspection (RSI) supported submission has been made for funding through the WA State Accident Black Spot program, as this project does not qualify for funding under the Federal Accident Blackspot Program.

 

2.       Wanneroo Road/Kingsway/Woodlake Retreat Intersection, Madeley – New Left Turn Pocket at Southbound Wanneroo Road (Attachment 2)

 

Wanneroo Road at Kingsway is an existing signalised four-way intersection. Wanneroo Road is a four lane dual carriageway Primary Distributor Road and is under the care and control of MRWA. It carries approximately 25,000 vehicles every day. Kingsway is a Local Distributor Road and carries approximately 8,000 vehicles per day. The five-year crash data indicates a total of 41 crashes occurring at the intersection, 4 of which required Hospital admission, 11 required medical attention and 26 are property damage only.

 

The intersection qualifies for both State and Federal Blackspot Funding. The Federal program guidelines stipulate a maximum delivery time frame of one (1) financial year; and the State program a maximum of two (2) financial years, both with the ability to request only a 12-month extension. Both scenarios for funding fit the projected delivery timing for the project.

 

While Wanneroo Road is managed by MRWA, who could make a funding application for the intersection upgrade, due to the number of qualifying sites on MRWA controlled roads, the project is not a high priority. The City application for funding will bring forward this project to provide the earliest possible safety benefits to City of Wanneroo road users.

 

Treatment

 

A road safety inspection highlighted there is a need for auxiliary left turn lane for vehicles turning left into Kingsway. This will alleviate masking of southbound vehicles by left turning vehicles. The proposal is for installation of a 65m long auxiliary left turn lane and minor modification of the traffic island.

 

The project cost for the work is estimated at $2,201,754 and is a Road Safety Inspection supported submission.

 

3.       Connolly Drive/Kingsbridge Boulevard/Landbeach Boulevard, Butler – Pre-deflection and Pavement bars (Attachment 3)

 

Connolly Drive is designated as ‘District Distributor A’ roads as per Main Roads Road Hierarchy and are constructed as a median separated four lane dual carriageway. Kingsbridge Boulevard and Landbeach Boulevard are both Local Distributor roads as per Main Roads Road Hierarchy and are constructed as median separated two lane roads with a single carriageway each direction. Their intersection is at a 4-way roundabout with double lane configuration in north-south direction along Connolly Drive and single lane in east-west direction along Kingsbridge Boulevard and Landbeach Boulevard. The five-year crash data indicates a total of 17 crashes occurring at the intersection, 3 of which required Hospital admission and 5 required medical treatment.

 

The intersection pre-qualifies for both State and Federal funding under the Blackspot Program.

Following the opening of the Mitchell Freeway extension to Romeo Road, traffic volumes along Connolly Drive south have reduced from approximately 21,000 to 9,000 vehicles per day. It is proposed to reconfigure the roundabout to reduce lane confusion and the occurrence of side-swipe crashes. This will allow pre-deflections to be installed on the north and southbound approaches of Connolly Drive to reduce the severity of right- angle crashes through approach speed reduction. Pavement lane separation bars will be installed giving physical vehicle separation between lanes on approach to reduce the occurrence of side swipe crashes. Minor bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements will also be carried out.

 

Treatment

 

A road safety inspection highlighted that there is a need for pre-deflection curves on the two Connolly Drive approaches to reduce the speed of approaching vehicles. This will reduce the number and severity of right-angled crashes. The proposal also included installation of pavement bars along both approaches to reduce the likelihood of side swipe crashes.

 

The project cost for the work is estimated at $551,952 and is a Road Safety Inspection and BCR supported submission.

 

4.       Woodvale Drive from Panzano Circuit to Ancestor Retreat, Woodvale - Traffic Management Scheme (Attachment 4)

Woodvale Drive is classified as a Local Distributor Road according to the Main Roads Road Hierarchy, accommodating approximately 7,500 vehicles daily. Whilst Woodvale Drive extends between Wanneroo Road and Trappers Drive, only the first 500m is located within the City of Wanneroo, with the remainder under the care and control of City of Joondalup. Woodvale Drive is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway between Wanneroo Road and Duffy Terrace with an average carriageway width of 9m. A 2.5-meter concrete pathway is located along the western and northern verge. A Transperth Bus Service operates along Woodvale Drive. The surrounding road environment is a mix of residential and rural development and the Regional Park area. The speed limit on this road is 50 km/hour, but the 85th percentile (operating) speed on this road is over 60 km/h. Analysis of five years of crash data reveals a total of six reported incidents between Duffy Terrace and Wanneroo Road, with one resulting in hospitalization, two requiring medical attention and three involving property damage. Woodvale Drive receives a score of 88 when evaluated using the City of Wanneroo’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy.

Treatment

The proposed solution includes an extended intersection plateau, and a central flush median designed to lower vehicle speeds and lessen crash severity, while also discouraging reckless driving behaviour. This, in turn, will contribute to a safer roadway. The estimated cost for these improvements is $540,000. An application for a Road Safety Inspection (RSI) supported submission has been made for funding through the WA State Accident Black Spot program, as this project does not qualify for funding under the Federal Accident Blackspot Program.

Consultation

For the Kemp Street and Woodvale Drive projects, which directly impact residents on these roads, community consultation has already been undertaken for feedback on the original concept designs, which has been incorporated into the submitted designs as appropriate.

 

For the Wanneroo Road/Kingsway and Connolly Drive/Kingsbridge Boulevard projects, where the works do not provide a direct impact on residents, the community will be informed if the project is successful in attracting funding, followed up by notification ahead of construction commencement.

Comment

The projects selected have been identified to maximise the opportunity for the City to address the traffic safety concerns at these locations by utilising funding under the competitive selection process.

Applying for projects under the State and National Black Spot program enables the City to use available municipal funds more effectively, so that more improvement works and upgrades can be completed annually and identified accident Black Spots can be made safer.

Statutory Compliance

Nil

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.4 - People can move around easily

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-G09 Long Term financial Planning	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-S04 Integrated Infrastructure & Utility Planning	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Assets and Director Planning & Sustainability	Manage

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

The budget required to fund the City’s Black Spot submissions depends on the success of the proposed submissions. Successful projects may receive full funding by the Australian Federal Government or two-third funding by the State Government.

The total cost of the submitted projects is $4,097,697 with a maximum municipal component of $1,365,899 if all submitted projects are successful in obtaining State funding only. The draft Long-Term Capital Works Program assumes only State funding levels for the projects listed in this report. If any project is successful in receiving Australian Federal Government funding, the Municipal component will be reduced and the Long Term Capital Works Program adjusted accordingly. The exact funding requirements will be considered and listed for Council’s consideration in the 2026/2027 budget process.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council ENDORSES the submission of the following City of Wanneroo projects for funding consideration as part of the 2026/27 State and Australian Government Black Spot Programs:

 

1.       Kemp Street from Archer Street to Lenore Road, Pearsall - Traffic Management Scheme;

 

2.       Wanneroo Road/Kingsway/Woodlake Retreat intersection, Madeley - New Left Turn Pocket at Southbound Wanneroo Road;

 

3.       Connolly Drive/Kingsbridge Boulevard/Landbeach Boulevard, Butler - Pre-deflection and Pavement bars; and

 

4.       Woodvale Drive, Woodvale – Raised Intersection Treatment.

 

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1: 4577 - Kemp Street - Traffic Treatments - Drawing	25/189283
2⇩.	Attachment 2: 4543 - Wanneroo Rd & Kingsway Drawing	25/227381
3⇩.	Attachment 3: 4615 - Kingsbridge Blvd - Connolly Dr Drawing	25/205597
4⇩.	Attachment 4: 4512-Woodvale Drive Drawing	25/228125

 

 

 

 

 

CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 September, 2025                                                1

 

Strategic Asset Management

File Ref:                                              6237V004 – 25/248826

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       1         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider the installation of a variable speed limit on Wanneroo Road through the Wanneroo Townsite.

Background

Wanneroo Road through the Wanneroo Townsite currently has a posted speed of 60 km/hour. To improve safety and amenity for all modes of transport within the townsite, Administration has been discussing with Main Roads WA (MRWA) options for reducing the posted speed. Once such option is to implement a time-based reduced speed zone of 50km/hour on Wanneroo Road between Noonan Drive and Church Street, as shown in (Attachment 1).

Detail

Wanneroo Road carries over 30,000 vehicles per day as it passes through the Wanneroo Townsite. In the 5 years to 31 December 2024, there have been 67 reported crashes on the section between Noonan Drive and Church Street, with 27 that required medical attendance as a minimum.

 

While Wanneroo Road serves an essential transportation function, reducing the posted speed through the Wanneroo Townsite will improve amenity for users of the area and reduce the severity and likelihood of crashes. It will also serve as an indicator to drivers that they are entering an area with increased pedestrian activity.

 

To implement the variable speed zone, 11 solar powered signs are required, located as shown in (Attachment 1). These signs will show the reduced speed of 50 km/hour between the hours of 7.30am and 10.00 pm each day. Similar speed restriction changes are in place on Albany Highway through the Gosnells and Kelmscott Townsites. 

 

To ensure the earliest implementation of the reduced speed zoning as a safety initiative, MRWA have suggested that the City contribute 50% of the cost of the installation, estimated to be a total cost of $80,000. Should the City choose not to contribute, then these works will be scheduled to occur once the MRWA programme of speed reduction at traffic signals and guard-controlled school crossings is completed, currently estimated to be by 2030.

Consultation

Reduced speed limits have been discussed with the Roadwise and the Wanneroo Town Centre Advisory Groups. 

Comment

The earliest possible introduction of the speed limit changes is supported due to the road safety and public amenity improvements that they will provide.

 

Reducing the speed through the Wanneroo Townsite will make the road less of a perceived barrier to movement and encourage pedestrian activity.

Statutory Compliance

Main Roads WA is the responsible state authority for the installation, removal and maintenance of all regulatory signage in Western Australia. Therefore, the option outlined in this report incorporating the speed zone changes requires the approval of Main Roads WA.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.4 - People can move around easily

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-023 Safety of Community	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Community & Place	Manage

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Funding for the installation of the signs is not included in the traffic treatments programme in the 2025/26 budget. It is suggested that $40,000 funding be provided for the installation of the signs in the 2026/27 budget, with the intent that they be installed in July 2026.

 

Should funding become available as part of the 2025/26 mid-year budget review, then Council could consider providing funding for an earlier implementation.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.         SUPPORTS the part time reduction in the posted speed limit on Wanneroo Road between Noonan Drive and Church Street; and

2.         LISTS $40,000 funding for the installation of new variable speed signs in the draft 2026/27 Capital Works Program under the Traffic Treatments program.

Attachments:

1⇩.

Attachment 1 Concept plan - Town Centre Variable Speed Zone 50-60 - Wanneroo Road - Wanneroo

25/254971

 

 

 

CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 September, 2025                                                1

 

Waste Services

File Ref:                                              24941V02 – 25/159413

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       Nil

Previous Items:                                   MN07-02/25 - Mayor Aitken - Provision of Bin-Mounted Dog Waste Bag Dispensers - Ordinary Council - 25 Feb 2025 6:00pm       

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider a proposal for incorporating integrated dog waste bag dispensers as a standard feature on all new and replacement park general waste bins, along with proposed changes to the Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space.

Background

Council considered a report Item MN07-02/25  Mayor Aitken - Provision of Bin-Mounted Dog Waste Bag Dispensers at its Ordinary council meeting on 25 February 2025 and resolved as following:

“That Council REQUESTS Administration to investigate and prepare a proposal, including the proposed changes to the Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space, for new and replacement park general waste bins as standard to feature integrated dog waste bag dispensers and provide an update to Council Members by September 2025.”.              

Local Planning Policy 4.3: Public Open Space (LPP 4.3) currently does not include provisions for bag dispensers. This Policy is currently under review which will consider the inclusion of bin and bag dispenser provisions.

Historically, bag dispensers were installed in off-lead areas and dog beaches with additional installations occurring in response to community feedback. A revised strategy is proposed to guide future installations in a consistent and planned manner.

Detail

The City’s Waste Services team currently provide a service to 335 parks, maintaining approximately 1,200 general waste bins and 102 bag dispensers located across 81 parks. These dispensers are primarily situated in off-lead areas, dog beaches, and high-use parks.

The community utilises approximately 3 million bags annually, demonstrating strong demand and the importance of maintaining and expanding dispenser coverage.

Research and Evaluation of Bag Dispensers

In response to Council’s decision, Administration has conducted a comprehensive review of available bag dispenser models. Three integrated dispenser types were trialled across selected parks. Feedback from both community users and operational staff highlighted the superior performance of the integrated units in terms of:

·        Ease of use.

·        Durability.

·        Cost-efficiency.

·        Reduced vandalism.

As a result, the integrated dispenser model has been adopted as the standard for all new and replacement park bins.

Draft Installation Criteria

 

To ensure consistent and strategic infrastructure planning and delivery, Administration has developed criteria for the installation of public place bins and bag dispensers. These criteria will be incorporated into the Waste Services Operational Guideline (Waste Guideline):

 

·        Public Place Bins: Installed in parks featuring BBQs, playgrounds, or similar facilities, with the number of bins reflecting park usage levels and seasonal variations. All units must be safely accessible for servicing.

 

·        Exclusions: Small parks without facilities, pedestrian access ways, and parks comprised solely of vegetation will not automatically receive bins or dispensers.

 

·        Bag Dispensers: Typically installed on bin poles in residential areas, dog beach entrances, sporting grounds and co-located ovals. Dispensers are not standard in commercial or industrial areas unless located within designated activity centres.

 

·        Discretionary Installations: May be approved where justified by community use or feedback.

 

A preliminary review identified up to 486 parks would meet the proposed draft criteria.

 

Service Gap and Expansion Requirements

 

To implement consistent infrastructure across all 486 parks, the following installations are required:

Installation Type	Number of parks
Dispenser Installation Only	254
Bin and Dispenser Installation	151
Replacement Dispensers (as required)	81

 

This equates to a total of 507 new dispensers required to achieve full infrastructure implementation.

 

This represents:

 

·        A 45% increase in public place bin servicing (from 335 to 486 parks).

 

·        A 500% increase in bag dispenser coverage (from 81 to 486 parks).

Resource Requirements

In order to implement and service the expanded public place bin and bag dispenser infrastructure across all 486 parks, additional resources will be required to support planning, installation, ongoing maintenance, and operational servicing. This includes twice-weekly refilling of dispensers and regular waste collection.

A five-year rollout is proposed, subject to Council support, to manage the scale of implementation and ensure operational sustainability. The rollout would require additional staff, plant & equipment resources to support this proposal.

Monitoring and Asset Management

Dispenser usage will be monitored regularly. Underutilised infrastructure may be removed to optimise resources. An operational management plan will be developed to support ongoing maintenance and renewal.

Developer Contributions

A review of developer specifications will be undertaken to mandate the inclusion of standardised bins and bag dispensers in new park developments, ensuring consistency across the City’s public open spaces.

Consultation

Internal consultation has been undertaken with the relevant stakeholders in developing this proposal.

Comment

The integration of bag dispensers into park bins aligns with community expectations, improving both amenity and hygiene in public spaces. The use of flexible installation criteria allows for tailored implementation across a variety of park types and usage patterns.

To support this approach, it is recommended that installation criteria be included in the Waste Guideline, rather than embedded directly within LPP 4.3. This will provide greater flexibility to respond to changing community needs and park usage trends.

As part of LPP 4.3 review, if supported by Council, the Waste Guideline will be referenced within the policy. This change would support a more adaptable and responsive model for managing public waste infrastructure across the City.

Statutory Compliance

The proposal aligns with the intent of LPP 4.3 and will be incorporated into the policy review process. No statutory impediments have been identified.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

4 ~ A sustainable City that balances the relationship between urban growth and the environment

4.4 - Manage waste and its impacts

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 4, we will accept a Medium level of risk. The nature of the City being ‘pro-growth’ means that commercial opportunities will be explored in areas identified for development, potentially challenging perceptions of the City as an environmental steward.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

There are no existing Strategic or Corporate risks within the City's existing risk registers which relate to the issues contained in this report.

Policy Implications

·        Update LPP 4.3 to include reference to the provision of bins and bag dispensers, with placement criteria to be detailed in the Waste Guideline.

·        Ensure the Waste Guideline is reviewed annually to maintain responsiveness to community needs and usage patterns.

·        Update relevant standards to clarify developer requirements for bin and dispenser provision in new park developments.

Financial Implications

Additional costs may be incorporated into normal budget cycles.

Year	Estimated Annual Expenditure
1	$603,045.43
2	$385,966.63
3	$447,427.23
4	$508,887.83
5	$570,348.43

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

 

1.       SUPPORTS the integration of bag dispensers as a standard feature on all new and replacement park general waste bins across the City;

 

2.       REQUESTS administration to implement the integrated approach for the waste bins and bag dispensers over a 5 year period; and

 

3.       REQUESTS administration to include the references to the provisions of bins and integrated bag dispensers in new parks.

4.                      

 

Attachments: Nil

CITY OF WANNEROO Agenda OF Ordinary Council Meeting 23 September, 2025                                                1

 

File Ref:                                              52596 – 25/308857

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       1         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Additional information has been added to the Financial Implications section.

Issue

To consider advertising the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct (NRRP) Business Plan (Attachment 1), prepared in accordance with Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995 (Act).

Background

In December 2024, Council resolved the following through report AS03-12/24 - Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct – Masterplan.

“That Council:-

1.       ENDORSES the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct Masterplan (Attachment 2 & 3) as the key guiding tool for the development of the future waste management precinct for the City;

2.       AUTHORISES Administration to implement the recommendations made by Talis Consultants (Attachment 3) and list the works identified under the financial Implications section of this report to support the development of the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct;

3.       AUTHORISES Administration to progress the design, documentation and associated project development work for the Wangara Waste Transfer Station during 2024/25;

4.       APPROVES by ABSOLUTE MAJORITY an unbudgeted amount for the Wangara Waste Transfer Station (Project Number – TBA) of $120,000 in the Capital Work Budget in Financial Year 24/25 to be funded from Waste Management Reserve to progress the design, documentation and associated project development work for the Wangara Waste Transfer Station; and

5.       LISTS funds $2,540,000 for consideration in the 2025/26 budget to undertake the construction of Wangara Waste Transfer Station.”

Detail

Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995 (LGA) requires local governments to prepare a business plan prior to (1) commencing a major trading undertaking or (2) entering into a major land transaction. “Major trading undertaking” and “major land transaction” are both defined in the Act and prescribed regulations (reg 8A and 9 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996).

 

It was determined that components required for progressing the NRRP fell under both definitions and as such, the City is required to prepare a business plan. These include the proposed lease of land for a privately constructed and operated Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and construction of a Waste Transfer Station (WTS), Community Recycling Centre (CRC), and associated supporting infrastructure.

Consultation

A separate period of community consultation for the project is due to take place for a period of 28 days in September/October 2025, providing community members an opportunity to provide comment and feedback on the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct concept design and functionality.

Comment

The Business Plan has been prepared by Talis Consultants on behalf of the City with legal review undertaken by the City’s external legal provider Jackson McDonald.

 

The purpose of this plan is to meet the statutory requirements stipulated in Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995, which requires a Local Government Authority to prepare a Business Plan as follows.

 

“(2)    Before it

 

(a)     Commences a major trading undertaking; or

(b)     Enters into a major land transaction; or

(c)     Enters into a land transaction that is preparatory to entry into a major land transaction,

 

a local government is to prepare a business plan.”

 

The NRRP meets the definition of a ‘major trading undertaking’ and the Business Plan will answer the six key items below for public advertising, allowing the community to comment prior to the project further progressing.

 

“(3)    The business plan is to include an overall assessment of the major trading undertaking or major land transaction and is to include details of —

 

(a)     its expected effect on the provision of facilities and services by the local government;

(b)     its expected effect on other persons providing facilities and services in the district;

(c)     its expected financial effect on the local government;

(d)     its expected effect on matters referred to in the local government’s current plan prepared under section 5.56;

(e)     the ability of the local government to manage the undertaking or the performance of the transaction; and

(f)      any other matter prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.”

 

Following the Statewide public advertising period under Section 3.59(4) of 42 days from 30 September to 10 November 2025 with a report to be presented to Council in December 2025 to consider all submissions and Council may decide, by absolute majority, to proceed with the Major Trading Undertaking as described in this Business Plan in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995, Section 3.59.

Statutory Compliance

Section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995 (LGA) sets out the steps required for commercial enterprises by local governments and Section 10 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 sets out the requirements for a business plan for a major trading undertaking.

 

As required by Section 3.59 of the LGA, local governments undertaking commercial enterprises are required to:

 

1.       Prepare a business plan; 

2.       Undertake local and statewide advertising of the business plan; and

3.       Consider any submissions received.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

4 ~ A sustainable City that balances the relationship between urban growth and the environment

4.4 - Manage waste and its impacts

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 4, we will accept a Medium level of risk. The nature of the City being ‘pro-growth’ means that commercial opportunities will be explored in areas identified for development, potentially challenging perceptions of the City as an environmental steward.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-G09 Long-Term Financial Planning	Low
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Corporate Strategy & Performance	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
ST-S23 Stakeholder Relationships	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Chief Executive Officer	Manage

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-O22 Environmental Management	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Planning & Sustainability	Manage

Policy Implications

Provisions of the Community Engagement Policy, Development Activities by the City Policy apply.

Financial Implications

The capital costs listed within the Business Plan (page 9) for the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct reflect those within report AS03-12/24 - Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct – Masterplan, endorsed by Council in December 2024, as follows:

Description	Total	City	Private Sector
Community Recycling Centre	$4,520,000	$4,520,000	-
Weighbridge	$825,000	$825,000	-
Material Recovery Facility	$40,000,000	-	$40,000,000
Waster Transfer Station	$5,278,000	$5,278,000	-
Enabling Works Package	$4,000,000	$4,000,000	-
Road Upgrades	$2,000,000	$2,000,000	-
Sub Total	$56,623,000	$16,623,000	$40,000,000
Contingency (20%)	$11,324,600	$3,324,600	$8,000,000
Professional Fees (6%)	$3,397,380	$997,380	$2,400,000
Cost Escalation (7%)	$3,963,610	$1,163,610	$2,800,000
Grand Total	$75,308,590	$22,108,590	$53,200,000

 

Estimates for operational costs are also included in the Business Plan (pages 9/10). An annual return of $350,000 - $950,000 is estimated upon completion of the project, as follows:

 

Source	Description	Potential Annual Offset
User fees	User disposal fees	$3.5M – $6M
Sale of recyclables	Scrap metal, cardboard, e-waste	$100K – $150K
Total Offsets		$3.5M – $6M

 

The precinct facility may also satisfy the criteria for some initial operational set up funding from the WA Waste Authority and/or DWER, estimated to be $100k-$300k. It should be noted that this funding may also be replenished again after 3-5 years of operation.

 

The Waste Reserve currently contains $15.9m which is allocated to the Neerabup projects, Wangara WTS and some reoccurring Waste infrastructure costs.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council ADOPTS the Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct Business Plan, as shown as Attachment 1, for advertising in accordance with section 3.59 of the Local Government Act 1995.

 

Attachments:

1⇩.

Attachment 1 - Neerabup Resource Recovery Precinct - Section 3.59  Business Plan

25/308836

 

 

File Ref:                                              3120V023 – 25/238948

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       2         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider petition PT01-06/25, received at the meeting of Council held on 24 June 2025, requesting the closure of the Pedestrian Access Way (PAW) between Rupara Circle and Marmion Avenue, Quinns Rocks.

Background

At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 24 June 2025, Council received a Petition requesting the closure of the PAW, signed by 25 residents from Rupara Circle Refer. The petition advised:

 

“Over the years we have noticed an increase of activity with people from nearby areas using the walkway as a quick entry and exit point all hours of the day including early hours of the morning and late at night. This has resulted in numerous unsettling incidents in which Police have attended or been notified. We recently had a vehicle break in on our property and have also experienced the following:

 

·        Trespassing onto our property.

·        Disturbances at night and early hours of the morning outside our house with people going past yelling loud vocalisation and escalating behaviour either intoxicated or under the influence.

 

The walkway is used as a dumping group for supermarket trolleys, rubbish and people hanging around the area. It is constantly vandalised with graffiti either on the outside walls of Marmion Avenue or inside walls of the walkway, devaluing our street.”

 

Refer to (Attachment 1) for a locality map showing the location of the PAW within the road network.

Detail

The PAW is located at the northeastern corner of Rupara Circle and connects Rupara Circle to the shared path along the western side of Marmion Avenue. The PAW runs between 30 Rupara Circle and the City’s Drainage Sump.

 

Lot 30P Rupara Circle is approximately 32 metres long and 8.0m wide and is a dedicated Pedestrian Access Way.

 

·        It has good visibility from Rupara Circle which promotes passive surveillance, as shown in (Attachment 2);

·        The concrete footpath within the Lot 30P is two metres wide, with a 3.0 metre nature strip on both sides, planted with mature trees;

·        Streetlights exist at both ends of the PAW however these are not directly located at its entry or exit points;

·        The PAW has U-Rail barriers and pine post and rail fencing at either end which prevents car access;

·        The PAW provides direct pedestrian connection to key attractors which are the Brighton Shopping precinct and bus stops on Marmion Avenue to the north of the PAW from Rupara Circle. This provides a pedestrian access route for residents in adjacent roads in the northeast section of the subdivision;

·        The PAW provides walking and cycling connectivity to Marmion Avenue, which is identified as a Secondary route in accordance with the Department of Transport Long Term Cycle Network for Perth and Peel; and

·        The PAW is in a good condition with routine inspection/ maintenance taking place bi-annually as with all City PAW’s.

Consultation

Internal consultations have been undertaken to identify any issues relating to the petition.

Comment

PAWs provide important walking and cycling connectivity to key destinations and activity centres within the community. The City of Wanneroo Active Transport & Cycle Plan 2022/23 to 2025/26 also supports this through supporting the City’s Strategic Community Plan objective to create a Connected and Accessible City by providing a continuous pathway network that links to activity centres, schools and transport hubs.

 

The PAW provides a convenient access to Bus Stops 25551 and 25556, served by Route 482, which runs between Butler and Clarkson Train Stations at a 10-minute frequency at peak times – refer (Attachment 1). Closure of the PAW would increase the journey distance for residents in Rupara Circle, Mutiny Terrace, Mission Place and Sellar Elbow beyond the PTA’s desired 400m walking distance to the bus stop, increasing journey distances by up to 250 metres.

 

As such, closure of this PAW to address the occurrence of anti-social behaviour is not supported by Administration given that it is not a desirable outcome for the wider community that utilises the walking or cycling connection that it provides to key local destinations.

 

The ongoing management and maintenance of the PAW remains the responsibility of the City, however, as the City receives a great variety of enquiries associated with PAW's, measures to reduce antisocial behaviour occurring within the PAW requires input from multiple service units across the City. The City undertakes measures to assist in reducing or addressing any ongoing antisocial behaviour as outlined below:

 

·        Removal of graffiti and make repairs/clean up the PAW quickly to promote use of the PAW as a public space maintained by the City. Routine inspection/ maintenance also takes place as with all City PAW’s and residents can request clean-up of graffiti, dumped rubbish or weeds in the PAW by calling the City;

·        Encouraging residents to contact the WA Police on 131 444 if incidents of antisocial and/or criminal behaviour are witnessed as these matters are unable to be addressed by the City’s Rangers;

·        Upgrade street lighting to LED in accordance with the appropriate Australian Standards to enhance visibility at both ends of the PAW; and

·        Rangers undertake routine patrols when in the area and/ or contact the WA Police in response to criminal activity.

 

 

Records show that the PAW was visited by the City’s maintenance team to remove graffiti on the boundary wall adjacent to No 30 Rupara Circle on three occasions since 2023 and three occasions for removal of graffiti on the boundary fence facing Marmion Avenue for properties on Rupara Circle.

 

Maintenance of the PAW is carried out by the City’s Contractor and is scheduled to occur every 3 weeks, while the Marmion Avenue verge is maintained every 6 weeks.

 

Administration will investigate the streetlighting adjacent to the PAW within Rupara Circle to ensure that it meets the required level of illumination.

 

The City’s records do not indicate a pattern of reported antisocial behaviour, with Rangers having attended Rupara Circle 4 times in the past two years for a range of issues concerning parking and vehicles.

 

Rangers continue to encourage landowners and residents adjoining PAWs in the City to contact WA Police as the responsible authority to enforce the law.

Statutory Compliance

While the City is responsible for management of a PAW and Council may support its’ closure, the permanent closure of a PAW requires the endorsement of the Western Australian Planning Commission prior to referring the proposal to the Minister for Lands for final approval.

 

The process for PAW Closure is detailed in the WAPC document “Procedure for the Closure of Pedestrian Access Ways – Planning Guidelines”.

 

Procedure for the closure of pedestrian access ways planning guidelines 2009

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.4 - People can move around easily

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

 

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-023 Safety of Community	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Community & Place	Manage

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Financial implications relate to ongoing maintenance and/ or other capital works measures that may be considered by Administration to assist in reducing antisocial behaviour. Such costs are not considered to be overly significant and can be absorbed by ongoing operational budget or recurring capital works programs.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       DOES NOT SUPPORT the closure of the pedestrian accessway between Rupara Circle and Marmion Avenue (Attachment 1), as requested in the Petition
PT01-06/25;

2.       REQUESTS Administration to investigate and implement further suitable measures to assist in reducing or addressing any ongoing antisocial behaviour within the pedestrian accessway, noting that some of which may require consideration under the City’s Capital Works Program; and

3.       ADVISE lead petitioners of its decision.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 Location Plan Rupara Way PAW	25/258947
2⇩.	Attachment 2 Rupara Circle PAW Streetview	25/258980

 

 

 

 

 

File Ref:                                              3120V023 – 25/240088

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       2         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider petition PT04-06/25, received at the meeting of Council held on 24 June 2025, requesting that the City take action to install speed bumps to improve safety in Southampton Lane in Mindarie.

Background

At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 24 June 2025, Council received a Petition signed by 17 residents from Southampton Lane and Bristol Lane which requested:

 

“We, the undersigned residents of Mindarie, respectfully request that the City of Wanneroo take urgent action to improve safety in Southampton Lane, a residential laneway increasingly used as a high-speed thoroughfare by non-residents”

 

The petition outlined the following reasons for the request:

 

·        Due to the recent installation of speed humps on Alexandria View, drivers are now diverting through Southampton Lane to bypass these traffic-calming measures.

·        This laneway was designed for local residential use only, but it is now being used as a shortcut, significantly increasing traffic volume and posing a safety risk to residents – particularly children, pedestrians and pets.

·        Vehicles are frequently observed speeding through the laneway, creating dangerous conditions and disturbing the quiet residential nature of the area.

Southampton Lane is a public road, 160m long constructed as a 6.0m wide laneway to provide rear access to residential lots on Alexandria View and Southampton Lane in Mindarie.

Refer to (Attachment 1) for a locality map showing the location of the laneway.

Detail

The petition advises:

 

“We are petitioning for the following:

 

1.         Installation of speedhumps on Southhampton Lane to slow down traffic and enhance safety for residents.

2.         Designation of Southhampton Lane as a residents-only laneway, with appropriate signage and monitoring, to deter non local traffic using it as a bypass.

3.         One way traffic only from South to North direction”.

The complete text from the Petition is included as Attachment 2.

Consultation

No consultation has been carried out in response to the petition.

Comment

A traffic count was carried out in Southampton Lane from 5 to 25 July 2025, at approximately the midpoint of the laneway to determine traffic speeds and volumes.

 

The counts showed that an average of 88 vehicles per day used the laneway, 57 southbound and 31 northbound. There are three properties built north of the location of the counter, so the count demonstrates that vehicles exiting the car park are using the laneway in preference to Alexandria View.

 

The count showed that the 85 %ile (operating) speed is 29.7km/hr southbound and 33.4 northbound and that of the 1106 vehicles that were counted over the 3 weeks, 18 exceeded 40 km/hr with 3 of these exceeding 50km/hr. As indicated by the operating speeds, more vehicles travelling northbound were exceeding 40km/hour than southbound.

 

Although a Laneway falls under the 50km/h built up area speed limit, Liveable Neighbourhoods does indicate that the desired operating speed in laneways should be 30km/h. This operating speed is achieved on Southampton Lane, with only a very small number of vehicles driving at higher speeds.

 

Making Southampton Lane one way, as requested, would require approval from Main Roads WA for the signage and line marking, however due to the low traffic volumes in the area and limited surveillance, it would be difficult to ensure compliance and could make the current situation more dangerous as residents would not be expecting non-compliant traffic.

 

There is no legislative provision to allow public roads to be signed as “Residents Only”, so it would not be able to be enforced as signs would not be approved by Main Roads WA.

Statutory Compliance

The Road Traffic Act 1974 and associated Road Traffic Code 2000 contain regulations regarding speeding vehicles and one way traffic. These regulations can only be enforced by the WA Police.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.3 - Responsibly managed and maintained assets

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts. Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-023 Safety of Community	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Community & Place	Manage

Policy Implications

The provision of the City’s Local Area Traffic Management Policy apply to the issues noted in this report.

Financial Implications

Nil

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       DOES NOT SUPPORT the requested installation of traffic treatments, “Local Traffic Only” signs and implementation of northbound only One Way traffic restrictions on Southampton Lane, Mindarie as requested in the Petition PT04-06/25; and

2.       ADVISE the lead petitioner of its decision.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 Location Plan Southampton Lane	25/309980
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - Petition - Request for Speed Bumps in Southampton Lane Mindarie	25/307262

 

 

 

 

File Ref:                                              3120V023 – 25/238841

Responsible Officer:                          Director Assets

Attachments:                                       2         

 

Changes to Report and Additional Information Arising from Agenda Briefing

Nil

Issue

To consider petition PT05-06/25, received at the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 24 June 2025, requesting the nighttime closure and increased security of the public boardwalk / jetty at the south west corner of Mindarie Marina, Mindarie.

Background

At the Ordinary Council Meeting on 24 June 2025, Council received a Petition signed by 20 residents from Southampton Lane and Bristol Lane which requested:

 

“We, the undersigned residents and stakeholders of the Mindarie Marina community, respectfully submit this petition requesting immediate action to address the persistent and escalating crime and anti-social behaviour occurring on the public boardwalk/jetty located at the south west corner of the Mindarie Marina”

The boardwalk is contained within Pedestrian Accessway (PAW) Reserve 126P which is Crown Land, under the management of the City of Wanneroo.

Refer to (Attachment 1) for a locality map showing the location of the PAW.

Detail

The detail within the petition (Attachment 2) advises of issues experienced by residents adjacent to the PAW and requests that access to it be restricted between sunset and sunrise to combat anti-social behaviour.

It is suggested that to clarify when access to the Boardwalk is restricted, it be time based, similar to the Frederick Stubbs Car Park in Quinns Rocks. This has access restricted at nominated times, with the gates open between 5.00 am to 10.00 pm in summer and 5.00 am to 8.00 pm in Winter.

Consultation

Internal consultations have been undertaken to identify any issues relating to the petition. Changes to access in a PAW require the approval of the Minister for Lands and the City will need to follow similar consultation requirements to those required when a PAW is being considered for closure.  These are detailed in the WAPC document “Procedure for the Closure of Pedestrian Access Ways – Planning Guidelines”

 

Procedure for the closure of pedestrian access ways planning guidelines 2009

 

This requires a local government to consult the community likely to be affected by the proposed closure (including all abutting landowners), then consider all responses before determining whether to close the PAW.

 

It is therefore suggested that to determine the level of support for the requested restriction in access, public feedback be sought before Council consider whether to progress the requested time restricted access. Recognising the Regional use of the Mindarie Marina, in addition to sending letters to all residents within 400m of the Boardwalk, signs will be placed on the Boardwalk to advise users of the proposal and feedback will be sought using the Your Say Community Engagement Hub.

Comment

While PAWs provide important walking and cycling connectivity to key destinations and activity centres within the community, this one provides access over the Marina. It is used by many visitors to the Marina 

 

The ongoing management and maintenance of the PAW remains the responsibility of the City.

 

The City’s Rangers have advised that they have attended the site in response to three CRM’s regarding anti-social behaviour since 2022, with patrols carried out over a 4-week period, during which no anti-social activity was observed.

 

Furthermore, the City’s CCTV team visited the site and completed a review of the existing CCTV. There is already an extensive CCTV network within the Marina as well as along the jetty with over 10 on the Boardwalk alone. These cameras all feed back to the Marina security office. In addition, it was identified that each house facing the water has its own CCTV, with a number of PTZ cameras in place.

 

The City cannot access the CCTV footage as the cameras are the property of Mindarie Marina, however the number of cameras present provides extensive coverage. It should be noted that CCTV may not prevent the anti-social behaviour from occurring but plays a vital role to help identify the offenders in any post incident analysis.

Statutory Compliance

While the City manages Pedestrian Access Ways, the Department of Planning Lands and Heritage approve any modifications to their function on behalf of the Minister of Lands.  For the City to give authority to restrict access overnight to a PAW, the endorsement of the Western Australian Planning Commission is required prior to the proposal being referred to the Minister for Lands for final approval.

Strategic Implications

The proposal aligns with the following objective within the Strategic Community Plan 2021 – 2031:

5 ~ A well planned, safe and resilient City that is easy to travel around and provides a connection between people and places

5.5 - People feel safe in public places

Risk Appetite Statement

In pursuit of strategic objective goal 5, we will accept a Medium level of risk, extended to High in the areas of Community / Reputation & Financial / Commercial impacts.

Shifting transport modes and usage in the City may require short term pain for longer term gain as the City supports the development, maintenance and connection of alternatives to car use (e.g. cycle ways) and the supporting infrastructure.

 

Risk Management Considerations

Risk Title	Risk Rating
CO-023 Safety of Community	Medium
Accountability	Action Planning Option
Director Community & Place	Manage

Policy Implications

Nil

Financial Implications

Financial implications relate to ongoing maintenance and/or other capital works measures that may be considered by Administration to assist in reducing antisocial behaviour. Such costs are not considered to be overly significant and can be absorbed by ongoing operational budget or recurring capital works programs.

 

Should gates be required, this can be included in a future years’ annual budget.

Voting Requirements

Simple Majority

 

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       In response to Petition PT05-06/25 received at its 24 June 2025 Ordinary Council Meeting REQUESTS Administration to advertise the proposed timed closure of the pedestrian accessway for public comment in accordance with the requirements of the WA Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage;

2.       SEEKS a further report advising Council of the outcomes of the Consultation to determine whether timed closure should be supported; and

3.      ADVISE the lead petitioner of its decision.

Attachments:

1⇩.	Attachment 1 Location Plan Mindarie Marina Boardwalk	25/309978
2⇩.	Attachment 2 - Petition for Nighttime Closure and Increased Security of the Public Boardwalk Mindarie Marina June 2025	25/307297